2009.06.16 CC Agenda Packet
AGENDA
Edmonds City Council
Council Chambers, Public Safety Complex
250 5th Ave. North, Edmonds
______________________________________________________________
JUNE 16, 2009
6:30 p.m. - Executive Session: Legal advice regarding pending and threatened litigation. The executive session will
be held in the Jury Meeting Room and is scheduled for approximately 30 minutes.
7:00 p.m. - Call to Order and Flag Salute
1. Approval of Agenda
2. Approval of Consent Agenda Items
A. Roll Call
B. AM-2333 Approval of City Council Meeting Minutes of June 2, 2009.
C. AM-2341 Approval of claim checks #112046 through #112198 for $1,137,894.95 dated June 4, 2009,
and claim checks #112199 through #112370 for $913,671.92 dated May 11, 2009. Approval
of payroll direct deposits and checks #48121 through #48178 for the period May 16, 2009
through May 31, 2009 in the amount of $828,056.68.
D. AM-2316 Acknowledge receipt of Claim for Damages from Ken Behling ($510.99).
E. AM-2342 Reappointment of John McGibbon and Terry Vehrs to the Public Facilities District Board.
F. AM-2326 Interlocal Agreement - Consortium for Negotiation of Transfer of Cable Franchise
Agreement from Verizon Northwest, Inc. to Frontier Communications Corporation.
G. AM-2329 RCW 35.103 Annual Compliance Report - 2008.
H. AM-2330 Update City Strategic Plan II. Council Public Safety Objectives.
I. AM-2331 End of Edmonds Fire Department Volunteer Program.
J. AM-2337 Ordinance designating the site of the Olympic View Hotel, located at 200 Second Avenue
North, Edmonds, Washington for inclusion on the Edmonds Register of Historic Places, and
directing the Community Services Director or his designee to designate the site on the
Official Zoning Map with an "HR" Designation.
K. AM-2339 Ordinance designating the sandy beach area of Brackett's Landing North Park, located at 25
West Main Street, Edmonds, Washington for inclusion on the Edmonds Register of Historic
Places, and directing the Community Services Director or his designee to designate the site
on the Official Zoning Map with an "HR" Designation.
L. AM-2338 Ordinance designating the Edmonds Memorial Cemetery, located at 820 15th Street SW,
Packet Page 1 of 393
L. AM-2338 Ordinance designating the Edmonds Memorial Cemetery, located at 820 15th Street SW,
Edmonds, Washington for inclusion on the Edmonds Register of Historic Places, and
directing the Community Services Director or his designee to designate the site on the
Official Zoning Map with an "HR" Designation.
M. AM-2311 Ordinance amending ECDC Chapter 19.80 Board of Appeals adding new section 19.80.023
and repealing ECC Chapter 10.15 Building Board of Appeals.
N. AM-2344 Ordinance amending the provisions of ECC 6.20.040 to clarify where junk vehicles may be
stored; ECDC 17.60.040 Vehicles in Residential Zones, Subsections (A) and (B) to clarify
several scrivener's errors.
3. AM-2332
(30 Minutes)
Continued public hearing on utility rate and water tax increase.
4. AM-2343
(20 Minutes)
Public hearing on a proposed Ordinance amending the provisions of Edmonds
Community Development Code Chapter 17.50 Temporary Uses and Chapter 19.05.010
Work Exempt from Permit, regulating temporary uses and buildings.
5. AM-2334
(30 Minutes)
Presentation on 2009 levy options.
6. (20 Minutes)Public comment on 2009 levy options.
7.Audience Comments (3 minute limit per person)*
*Regarding matters not listed on the Agenda as Closed record Review or as Public Hearings.
8. AM-2328
(20 Minutes)
Red light camera installation.
9. AM-2340
(15 Minutes)
Authorization for the Mayor to sign a Professional Services Agreement with Rick
Jenness.
10. AM-2335
(15 Minutes)
Report on City Council Committtee Meetings of June 9, 2009.
11. (5 Minutes)Mayor's Comments
12. (15 Minutes)Council Comments
Adjourn
Packet Page 2 of 393
AM-2333 2.B.
Approve 06-02-09 Draft City Council Minutes
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:06/16/2009
Submitted By:Sandy Chase, City Clerk's Office Time:Consent
Department:City Clerk's Office Type:Action
Review Committee:
Committee Action:
Information
Subject Title
Approval of City Council Meeting Minutes of June 2, 2009.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
It is recommended that the City Council review and approve the draft minutes.
Previous Council Action
N/A
Narrative
Attached is a copy of the draft minutes.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: 06-02-09 Draft City Council Minutes
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 06/10/2009 03:01 PM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 06/10/2009 03:16 PM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 06/11/2009 09:34 AM APRV
Form Started By: Sandy
Chase
Started On: 06/10/2009 02:59
PM
Final Approval Date: 06/11/2009
Packet Page 3 of 393
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
June 2, 2009
Page 1
EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL DRAFT MINUTES
June 2, 2009
The Edmonds City Council meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Mayor Haakenson in the Council
Chambers, 250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds. The meeting was opened with the flag salute.
ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT
Gary Haakenson, Mayor
D. J. Wilson, Council President (arrived 7:55 p.m.)
Michael Plunkett, Councilmember
Peggy Pritchard Olson, Councilmember
Dave Orvis, Councilmember
Ron Wambolt, Councilmember
Strom Peterson, Councilmember
ELECTED OFFICIALS ABSENT
Steve Bernheim, Councilmember
STAFF PRESENT
Al Compaan, Police Chief
Jim Lawless, Assistant Police Chief
Stephen Clifton, Community Services/Economic
Development Director
Noel Miller, Public Works Director
Kathleen Junglov, Finance Director
Rob Chave, Planning Manager
Deb Sharp, Accountant
Bob Barker, Police Sergeant
Rob English, City Engineer
Scott Snyder, City Attorney
Sandy Chase, City Clerk
Jana Spellman, Senior Executive Council Asst.
Jeannie Dines, Recorder
1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
COUNCILMEMBER WAMBOLT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PETERSON,
TO APPROVE THE AGENDA IN CONTENT AND ORDER. MOTION CARRIED
UNANIMOUSLY. (Council President Wilson was not present for the vote.)
2. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS
Councilmember Wambolt requested Item G be removed from the Consent Agenda.
COUNCILMEMBER WAMBOLT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PLUNKETT,
TO APPROVE THE REMAINDER OF THE CONSENT AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED
UNANIMOUSLY. (Council President Wilson was not present for the vote.) The agenda items
approved are as follows:
A. ROLL CALL
B. APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF MAY 26, 2008.
C. APPROVAL OF CLAIM CHECKS #111791 THROUGH #111955 FOR $742,449.26
DATED MAY 21, 2009, AND CLAIM CHECKS #111956 THROUGH #112045 FOR
$519,546.57 DATED MAY 28, 2009. APPROVAL OF PAYROLL DIRECT DEPOSIT AND
CHECKS #48084 THROUGH #48120 FOR THE PAY PERIOD MAY 1, 2009 THROUGH
MAY 15, 2009 IN THE AMOUNT OF $834,166.40.
Packet Page 4 of 393
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
June 2, 2009
Page 2
D. ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT OF CLAIM FOR DAMAGES FROM SHAWN MITCHELL
(AMOUNT UNDETERMINED).
E. APPROVAL OF LIST OF BUSINESSES APPLYING FOR RENEWAL OF THEIR
LIQUOR LICENSES WITH THE WASHINGTON STATE LIQUOR CONTROL BOARD,
MAY 2009,
F. ORDINANCE NO. 3735 OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING
THE EDMONDS CITY CODE, TITLE 10, TO ADD A NEW CHAPTER 10.75, CITIZENS
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION.
ITEM G: ORDINANCE ADOPTING NEW CHAPTERS AND REPEALING CERTAIN CHAPTERS
IN TITLE 20 ECDC RELATING TO PROCEDURES FOR APPROVING LAND USE
DEVELOPMENT PERMITS; AMENDING VARIOUS ECDC SECTIONS THAT
REFERENCE SECTIONS IN REPEALED CHAPTERS IN TITLE 20 ECDC,
Councilmember Wambolt advised he pulled this item because he voted against it when it was discussed
by the Council.
Councilmember Plunkett asked if this ordinance retained the Council in quasi judicial decisions. City
Attorney Scott Snyder answered the ordinance kept the Council involved in all the quasi judicial
decisions it was currently involved in with the exception of one process that was removed entirely. A
former code section provided for the review of approved permits which was no longer possible following
the Nycrum decision. Councilmember Plunkett inquired whether the ordinance allowed oral or written
argument. Mr. Snyder responded it allowed written argument only.
Councilmember Orvis advised he would be unable to support the ordinance in its current form. As only
five members of the Council were present, he suggested delaying the discussion and decision. Mayor
Haakenson suggested rescheduling this as Item 6A when Council President Wilson would likely have
arrived. This was agreeable to the Council.
3. POLICE DEPARTMENT SWEARING-IN CEREMONY FOR SERGEANT BOB BARKER.
Police Chief Al Compaan described Sergeant Barker’s background that included 7 years in the military as
a Navy Seabee and a decision to move to this area after serving at Sandpoint. He served with the
Snohomish County Sheriff’s Department as a Reserve Officer and was hired by the Edmonds Police
Department in March 1986. He began as a patrol officer, served as a K-9 officer from 1990-1995,
promoted to Corporal in 1995, served in detectives 1996-1999, assigned to Youth Services/DARE in
1999-2003, returned to patrol 2003-2008 and Youth Services/DARE from 2008-2009. He is now
assigned to patrol as a shift supervisor.
Chief Compaan described Sergeant Barker’s community services activities that include the American
Cancer Society Relay for Life, Camp Good Times Youth Camp, and Special Olympics. In 2002 he was
named Edmonds Police Officer of the Year and Employee of the Year. In 2003 he was named DARE
officer of the year for Washington State. He has received six letters of commendation since joining the
Edmonds Police Department as well as numerous letters from citizens thanking him for his assistance.
Chief Compaan introduced Sergeant Barker’s wife Sherri, sons Chris and Austin and mother-in-law Jean
Stott. Chief Compaan swore in Sergeant Barker and presented him a framed certificate of promotion. He
commented it had been a pleasure to work with him and he was very proud of him.
Packet Page 5 of 393
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
June 2, 2009
Page 3
Sergeant Baker thanked the City Council for their support, commenting he would do his best to make the
City proud of their choice to promote him to Sergeant. His wife pinned on his Sergeant badge.
4. PUBLIC HEARING ON UTILITY RATE AND WATER TAX INCREASE.
Public Works Director Noel Miller explained since the late 1990s, the City has contracted with Financial
Consulting Solutions (FCS) Group to periodically analyze and provide recommendations for the City’s
utility rates. These rates finance the necessary stormwater, water and sewer services and must be
sufficient to finance each utility to meet operational and capital expenses.
Based on an updated analysis performed last year, FCS and City staff determined utility rate increases are
necessary and need to be implemented in 2009 for stormwater and water based on expenditures exceeding
projected revenues. The Utility Rate Study was reviewed by the City Council Finance Committee earlier
this year and they recommended the proposed rate increase be reviewed by the full Council at a public
hearing. The analysis also determined there is no need at this time to increase sanitary sewer rates.
Mr. Miller displayed a graph of the Water Utility operating forecast at existing rates. FCS’ analysis of the
Water Utility determined the surplus working capital will be depleted in 2009 with existing rates,
necessitating additional revenues. He displayed operating forecasts at existing rates for the Stormwater
Utility which also indicates surplus capital is being depleted.
He described factors affecting the water rate increase:
• Wholesale rates for the City’s source of water, Alderwood Water, continue to increase as a result
of improvements to the regional water treatment facility as well as replacement of regional water
transmission lines. He displayed a graph illustrating Alderwood Water’s rate history 1980-2009.
• Ongoing need to replace the City’s water system infrastructure; many of the pipes are at the end
of their useful life.
• A recent mandate by the State Department of Health requires the City reduce water system loss to
10% or less based on total water consumption.
• The gradual decrease in water consumption due to conservation mandates has reduced water
revenues.
• Lack of low interest loans and grant programs through the Public Works Trust Fund and State
Revolving Fund. He displayed a graph of annual water consumption as provided by Alderwood
Water, Seattle and combined.
He cited a recent Washington State Supreme Court Ruling that requires the cost for fire hydrants be paid
by general taxes (General Fund) rather than the Water Utility. Therefore the proposal includes a utility
tax increase on water service to pay for fire hydrants. Based on cost of service studies, expenditures for
fire hydrants including capital, operations and maintenance comprise approximately 8% of the Water
Utility expenditures.
Mr. Miller reviewed the proposed water rate and tax increase summary:
Existing Water charge (based on 7500 gallons per month): $25.49
2009 Increase: 16.8%
New Rate: $29.77
He displayed a graph of water rates from 1992 – 2009 compared to inflation, noting the trend has stayed
below the average rate of inflation of 3.2%.
Packet Page 6 of 393
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
June 2, 2009
Page 4
Mr. Miller reviewed the primary factors for the stormwater rate increase:
• The need for additional capital projects to replace aging or inadequate infrastructure and to
address flooding damage from recent severe storm events.
• Ongoing compliance with the Federal Clean Water Act as regulated by the State Stormwater
NPDES permit.
• Lack of funding for Federal and State low interest loan and grant programs.
He displayed a comparison of 2009 single family stormwater utility rates, pointing out Edmonds’ rate is
significantly lower than most water utilities in the area. He noted further rate increases were anticipated
in 2010 once the update of the City’s Stormwater Comprehensive Plan is completed later this year. He
advised the City is also in the process of updating the Water Comprehensive Plan which will include
further review of water rates in 2010.
He displayed a comparison of overall utility rates (water, sewer and stormwater) for Edmonds existing
($58.50) and proposed ($63.40) as compared to the AWC State average ($76.62). He summarized even
with the proposed rate increase, Edmonds’ rates were within the average in the Puget Sound area.
Mr. Miller relayed staff’s recommendation to increase the overall rate revenue by 16.8%. A portion of
the water rate increase will be offset by an 8.7% utility tax rate increase to pay for fire protection costs by
the General Fund. The average utility rate will increase 16.8% including the cost of fire hydrants that
would be funded via the General Fund. In addition, stormwater fees are recommended to be increased
6.82%. Based on the outcome of the public hearing, staff will prepare specific utility and tax rate
schedules for adoption by the City Council at a future meeting.
Councilmember Orvis asked when the last water rate increase occurred. Mr. Miller answered the last
water rate increase was in 2008; there was no rate increase at that time for sewer.
Councilmember Plunkett asked if a water loss study should have been conducted prior to the public
hearing. Mr. Miller answered that would be done as part of the Water Comprehensive Plan update.
Councilmember Plunkett asked if a Pipe Replacement Plan should have been presented for the public
hearing. Mr. Miller answered that would also be part of the Water Comprehensive Plan update. He noted
the capital improvements proposed in the six-year Capital Improvement Plan were factored in as reasons
for the 2009 rate increase. Councilmember Plunkett asked whether a Pipe Replacement Plan was a factor
in these costs. Mr. Miller answered it was, explaining replacement of pipes throughout the City has been
ongoing. He noted that Plan was identified in the current Water Comprehensive Plan.
Councilmember Plunkett asked how a citizen could understand the proposed increase if the Pipe
Replacement Plan was a factor in the increase but the Plan was not included in the public hearing
materials. Mr. Miller answered the intent of the public hearing was to gather public and Council input
regarding additional information. He advised this was the first public presentation regarding the proposed
increase.
Councilmember Plunkett asked how long the rate study had been available to the public. Mr. Miller
answered the rate study was made available to the public when a request for further information was
received yesterday. He assured if a citizen had requested the study earlier, it would have been made
available. Councilmember Plunkett commented this public hearing could be the first step; the rate study
and the Pipe Replacement Plan could be made available and a second public hearing could be held, and
the Council could approve the rates in the near future. Mr. Miller answered that timeline would be
acceptable.
Packet Page 7 of 393
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
June 2, 2009
Page 5
Councilmember Wambolt commented the cost of water was approximately $30/month or $1/day. He
inquired about the amount of Alderwood Water wholesale rate increases. Mr. Miller answered in the past
year their rate increased over 15% but the rate has decreased in earlier years; the average over 15-20 years
has been approximately the rate of inflation, 3.5%/year.
Councilmember Peterson observed funding for fire hydrants must now be paid from the General Fund
rather than utility taxes. He asked whether those funds would be specifically allocated for fire hydrants.
Finance Manager Kathleen Junglov answered the utility tax will be placed in the General Fund as a
general revenue and will not be specifically allocated to fire hydrants. The Utility Fund will bill the
General Fund for hydrant maintenance and capital.
Councilmember Peterson referred to upcoming federal programs related to stormwater and asked whether
the proposed rate increase would be adequate. Mr. Miller responded during the recent legislative session,
the State Legislature considered revenue sources that could be shared with local government such as
$1.50/barrel tax on oil. The legislature is aware local governments are faced with responsibility of
meeting federal mandates and he recommended the City continue to encourage State legislators to
consider funding sources.
Mr. Snyder advised the City would be faced with changes to the stormwater sewer ordinances mandated
by the recently adopted Phase II NPDES permit which will place additional enforcement requirements on
the City with respect to discharge into the City’s system. He advised that ordinance would be presented
to the Council later this summer. Councilmember Peterson asked if the cost associated with that
enforcement was considered in this rate increase. Mr. Miller answered additional staff hours devoted to
enforcement of the ordinance would be necessary. He pointed out the need to complete the Stormwater
Comprehensive Plan update in order to identify all additional costs. He advised as part of their study,
FCS will analyze expenditure needs and develop proposed revenue increases.
Mayor Haakenson opened the public participation portion of the public hearing.
Diane Buckshnis, Edmonds, emphasized the need for public transparency and providing sufficient
information to the public to facilitate an effective public hearing. She recalled voicing a similar issue
with the public hearing on amendments to Chapter 20. While the increases may be merited, she was
unable to locate any information from FCS, an updated Water Comprehensive Plan or a Pipe
Replacement Plan. She concluded citizens needed the tools to make a good decision. She requested the
Council schedule a second public hearing and that the public be provided additional information.
Roger Hertrich, Edmonds, agreed with Ms. Buckshnis that adequate information was not made
available to the public. He pointed out FCS had not made a formal presentation to the Council and there
was no written information available regarding their analysis. Next, he expressed concern about leaks in
Edmonds’ system; Seattle has a 3% loss, Olympic View Water District has a 7% loss and Edmonds’ loss
is 17%. He recommended the City identify the leaks and develop a plan to replace the pipes that are
leaking. He concluded the lack of supporting information put the credibility of the request in question.
Al Rutledge, Edmonds, commented the City previously received 1% of its water from Seattle. He
pointed out past reports indicated there would be increases in the future.
Hearing no further comment, Mayor Haakenson closed the public participation portion of the hearing.
Councilmember Plunkett asked staff to comment on leaks in Edmonds’ system. Mr. Miller responded the
City’s water loss three years ago was approximately 16-17%. It is currently about 10%; the State’s
benchmark is 10%. He noted the water loss in bigger systems was often a lower percentage due to the
Packet Page 8 of 393
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
June 2, 2009
Page 6
number of pipes. Edmonds is an older city with older pipes and many of the pipes installed with
development in Snohomish County would not be installed today. The City has been in the process of
placing pipes for the past 15 years. He acknowledged pipe replacement took time and cost a great deal.
Pipes are identified by age and condition and a leak survey is conducted of approximately 1/3 of the city
each year. He noted it is often difficult to detect slowly seeping leaks. Councilmember Plunkett observed
it appeared the City had a proactive process for identifying deterioration and leaks and for replacement.
Councilmember Plunkett asked when the Pipe Replacement Plan would be available. Mr. Miller
answered less than a week. He also offered to make the current Water Comprehensive Plan available
which identifies pipes that are in need of replacement in accordance with the current Plan.
Councilmember Plunkett observed in approximately one week the Pipe Replacement Plan and the rate
study would be available to the public and another public hearing could be scheduled.
Mr. Snyder advised ordinances would need to be drafted for the utility tax and the rate increases.
COUNCILMEMBER PLUNKETT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER ORVIS, TO
MAKE THE PIPE REPLACEMENT PLAN AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC AND CONTINUE
THE PUBLIC HEARING TO JUNE 16. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. (Council
President Wilson was not present for the vote.)
5. PUBLIC HEARING ON ORDINANCE REDUCING USE OF SINGLE USE PLASTIC
CHECKOUT BAGS IN EDMONDS.
Councilmember Peterson recalled the Council discussed this at the retreat and at previous public meetings
and it has created a great deal of excitement on both sides. He was encouraged that people had gotten
involved in the process of government. He has had conversations with the Northwest Grocers
Association, UFCW21 one of the unions representing local food service workers, and with the local food
banks. One of the positive unintended consequences of this legislation was an appreciation and
realization of how hard the food banks at the United Methodist Church and Westgate Chapel work. He
was shocked by the incredible increase in the number of people they served.
He was encouraged the community was interested in taking local action to address this issue and with the
thoughtful discussion regarding implementation. He applauded the Council for their willingness to
address difficult environmental issues.
For Councilmember Wambolt, Councilmember Peterson explained the food bank uses plastic bags to
package loose items as well as groceries and they are concerned with the possible financial impact the ban
would have on their efforts. He advised the NW Grocers Association worked with NW Harvest in Seattle
on a reusable bag giveaway and he has discussed with them the possibility of a similar effort in Edmonds.
(Council President Wilson arrived at 7:55 p.m.)
City Attorney Scott Snyder advised the three draft ordinances apply only to retail establishments;
therefore, the food bank’s operations would not be impacted.
Mayor Haakenson opened the public participation portion of the public hearing.
George Murray, Edmonds, provided a receipt from Petosa’s that included a 5 cent credit for using your
own bag, a receipt from PCC that states 5 cents will be donated to PCC Farms and Trust and the PCC
Food Bank Program for each bag, carton or container a customer reused.
Packet Page 9 of 393
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
June 2, 2009
Page 7
Mark Johnson, Vice President, Government Affairs, Washington Retail Association, a trade
association representing 2800 retailers in Washington, relayed their support for a reduction in one-time
single use paper and plastic bags, indicating they did not support an outright ban or tax on bags. He
preferred a cooperative effort between retailers and government and other stakeholders to achieve the goal
of fewer bags in the waste stream. The Retail Association offered to partner with Edmonds on an
aggressive reusable bag program coupled with increased recycling of paper and plastic bags. He noted
the Retail Association and other groups along with the City of Seattle and the Seattle Chamber of
Commerce held a reusable bag giveaway at NW Harvest Food Bank where over 50,000 reusable bags
were donated. Retailers in Spokane have partnered with groups to launch a Choose to Reuse Reusable
Bag Campaign. The Retail Association feared an outright ban on plastic bags or a tax would have a
detrimental impact on retailers as well as their customers. He encouraged the Council not to approve a
ban or tax and instead work with them and other stakeholders.
Laura Spehar, Edmonds, referred to comments expressed at Council meetings regarding fear the next
step would be a ban on leather shoes, fear people will shop outside Edmonds, how the ban would affect
those who cannot afford reusable bags and being seduced by the green movement in an election year. She
urged the Council to consider that Edmonds was becoming a champion city in sustainable efforts via the
new platinum certified PCC, the Mayor’s well attended Climate Change meetings, and the efforts of
Sustainable Edmonds. Residents of many communities view Edmonds as a great place to work, live and
play. Via its sustainable efforts, Edmonds demonstrates it is an intelligent, thoughtful and conscious
community where people, flora, fauna and marine life can flourish. She thanked the Mayor and Council
for opening this important dialogue.
Sarah Cherin, Seattle, Director of Government Relations, United Food & Grocery Workers Local
21, expressed the union’s support for the idea in concept. She explained they were heavily involved in
the Seattle effort and were supportive of reducing the amount of plastic bags. Their union represents PCC
workers who also do not provide plastic bags and she encouraged the Council to speak with them. She
urged the Council to include further customers education in the ordinance, noting Councilmember
Peterson planned to propose an amendment to incorporate that language.
Holly Chisa, Northwest Grocers Association, thanked Councilmember Peterson and others for their
willingness to meet with them to discuss this issue. They represent QFC, Safeway and Haggen Top
Foods, the three grocery stores in Edmonds who offer paper and plastic bags. Although they have
concerns with the three draft ordinances, they are willing to work with the Council on middle ground.
Their primary concern is charging customers for bags. She urged the Council if they approved an
ordinance, to adopt the version that impacted all retailers. If the ban was limited to grocery stores, only
three sources of bags would be addressed. She expressed support for the language that would add an
educational component for employees. She offered to present a Choose to Reuse Campaign to begin the
education process and to help people remember their reusable totes.
Dave Page, Edmonds, commented Edmonds was the best place to live. He remarked on the amount of
plastic and debris in Puget Sound. He explained the use of reusable bags needed to become a habit. He
was supportive of the ban on plastic bags and suggested people donate reusable bags.
Al Rutledge, Edmonds, referred to his letter and letters he obtained from the Edmonds Food Bank and
the Edmonds Lutheran Church expressing concern with the impact the proposed ban on plastic bags
would have on the food bank.
Rich Senderoff, Edmonds, appreciated the discussion regarding sustainability in Edmonds. He
recognized the impact plastic had on the ecosystem, but felt there were other sustainable practices that
impacted the local environment more significantly than legislating a single form of plastic. For example,
Packet Page 10 of 393
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
June 2, 2009
Page 8
the City has no tree preservation or invasive weed policy for public parks and common areas or private
residences. He agreed with Councilmember Wambolt regarding the issue of plastic bags, that it was
financially wasteful at a time the Council and administration needed to exercise prudent government
regarding expenditures prior to the levy vote when perception mattered. He questioned the amount that
had been spent and would be spent on legal fees regarding the plastic bag ban. He preferred the City
working with local environmental organizations and the business community to establish an Edmonds
businesses and residents sustainability checklist. The City could provide an Edmonds-kind of Sustainable
Practices Certification for businesses and residents that voluntarily meet the requirements, similar to the
Backyard Wildlife Habitat Certification Program, an approach that would provide a quantitative means of
evaluating the effectiveness of the program in raising awareness of sustainable practices before mandates
were created.
John Carlin, Edmonds, commented he had enjoyed listening to the pros and cons of the plastic bag
ordinance, noting most were based on economic issues. He described his practice of avoiding the use of
plastic bags and walking to the local grocery store, but emphasized the importance of consumer choice,
pointing out some people may feel entitled to choose their method of bringing home their groceries and
may even choose to shop outside Edmonds in order to get plastic bags. He urged the Council to respect
the choices of their constituents and not drag them along in the direction the Council felt was right.
Michael Young, Edmonds, expressed support for the plastic bag ban, emphasizing the science was in:
plastic was not good for the environment. With regard to taking away consumers’ choices, he compared
it to regulations regarding the disposal of paints, use of pesticides, etc. To the comment that a plastic bag
ban is not enough, Edmonds can be seen as a progressive, hip, green place to live which attracts both
residents and businesses. He urged the Council to do the right thing.
Rebecca Wolfe, Edmonds, commented on the importance of this debate, agreeing there were many
important issues but not taking action to ban plastic bags would be a mistake. She referred to the
environmental crisis and the role the production of plastics play in greenhouse gases. She referred to
reminders to reduce, recycle, reuse, commenting an ideal scenario would be if everyone begins using
reusable bags or even reuses plastic bags. She encouraged merchants not to provide any plastic bags to
their customers and instead sell reusable bags. She also supported rewarding residents and businesses
such as was suggested by Dr. Senderoff. She also suggested citizens donate reusable bags to those unable
to afford them.
Roger Hertrich, Edmonds, admonished the Council for wasting time with this discussion. He objected
to the ordinance that would force residents not to use plastic bags rather than asking for voluntary
compliance. He referred to Diane Buckshnis’ comments at last week’s meeting regarding garbage strewn
around Marina Beach and suggested the City penalize litterers instead of citizens who use plastic bags.
Ruth Arista, Edmonds, commented they have offered only paper bags at their business for the past 11
years, although plastic bags were less expensive. She recalled the concerns expressed by citizens using
walkers or scooters, noting the Helping Hands Closet has bags with handles that will fit inside a purse.
She did not support a 20 cent fee on plastic bags, noting that would be very uncomfortable for businesses.
They donate 25 cents toward the Fourth of July fireworks for anyone reusing a bag or box. She expressed
support for Dr. Senderoff’s suggestion to recognize sustainable businesses and residents. She urged the
Council to adopt the ban on plastic bags.
Clyde Demmick, Edmonds, expressed concern that reusable bags were often unsanitary, relaying a very
dirty bag he saw being used recently. He and several of his friends planned to shop outside Edmonds if
the Council adopted a ban on plastic bags.
Packet Page 11 of 393
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
June 2, 2009
Page 9
Robin [no last name given], Edmonds, displayed a globe that she used to demonstrate to children the
amount of plastic debris in the North Pacific Gyre. She expressed her thanks to the Council for their
support of a plastic bag ban, emphasizing the effort had to start somewhere. With regard to unsanitary
bags, she noted there were washable bags available. She anticipated in the future there would be a market
for designer reusable bags.
Hearing no further comment, Mayor Haakenson closed the public participation portion of the hearing.
Councilmember Plunkett commented he had heard and read about the possibility of draconian
consequences such as the City being sued if the Council adopted one of the ordinances. He asked about
the potential for a lawsuit. City Attorney Scott Snyder answered recent discussions have been in regard to
land use where state statutes create monetary liability for communities; that is not applicable in this
situation. The risk with an ordnance such as this would be the cost of defense. He explained there were a
number of similar ordinances in effect and he believed they were defensible.
Councilmember Plunkett asked if there was a question in law whether the Council had the police power to
regulate plastic. Mr. Snyder answered not in his opinion. If the Council chose one of the alternatives,
Mr. Snyder recommended a SEPA checklist process prior to final consideration.
Councilmember Plunkett asked about the estimated cost if the City were required to defend the ordinance.
Mr. Snyder answered $30,000 at the Superior Court level and $50,000 with an appeal. Councilmember
Plunkett asked whether there were other jurisdictions that would be interested in joining the City. Mr.
Snyder answered it was unlikely any would want to join the City. He had been involved in the defense of
a returnable bottle and can deposit legislation at the municipal level in the past; assuming the Council
made a proper legislative foundation and did SEPA, the ordinances were not fact-intensive to defend.
COUNCILMEMBER PETERSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER ORVIS, TO
ADOPT THE DRAFT RETAIL ORDINANCE (ATTACHMENT 6).
Councilmember Peterson commented this ordinance would treat all businesses the same, was the best for
the City, the best for business and the most equitable solution. He expressed appreciation to Mr. Snyder
and Bio Park for researching and drafting the ordinances. Under the draft retail ordinance no retail
establishments within the City of Edmonds would be allowed to offer plastic bags at the checkout stand.
Consumers would have two options, a recyclable paper bag or a reusable bag. This will not eliminate
plastic bags used within the store such as in the produce, meat or bulk food departments. The ordinance
also includes financial consequences for stores that do not comply, $150 for the first offense.
Councilmember Wambolt did not support the motion. He recognized Councilmember Peterson for
bringing this issue forward, commenting it could be better addressed via a method such as suggested by
Dr. Senderoff and Mr. Johnson. He preferred to have as little government as possible involved in
citizens’ lives particularly in this issue. He pointed out thousands of people already recycle without a
government mandate.
Mr. Snyder reiterated before the Council acted on the ordinance, he recommended staff do a SEPA
checklist process which would take approximately two weeks. He suggested the Council forward an
option to staff for SEPA review.
Councilmember Peterson amended the motion, with the agreement of the second, to forward the draft
retail ordinance to staff for SEPA review.
Packet Page 12 of 393
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
June 2, 2009
Page 10
COUNCILMEMBER PETERSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT WILSON,
TO AMEND SECTION 6.80.020 TO ADD, “THE CITY OF EDMONDS SHALL WORK WITH
RETAILERS, RETAIL ASSOCIATIONS, UNIONS AND OTHER ORGANIZATIONS TO
CREATE EDUCATIONAL ELEMENTS ABOUT THE BENEFITS OF REUSABLE BAGS. THIS
MAY INCLUDE SIGNAGE AT STORE LOCATIONS AND INFORMATION LITERATURE AND
EMPLOYEE TRAINING AND WILL TAKE PLACE BEFORE AND AFTER THE OPERATIVE
DATE.
Councilmember Peterson commented as a result of conversations with retailers, retail associations, unions
and other organizations, he wanted to ensure the implementation of the ordinance was as smooth as
possible. He acknowledged the ordinance was asking consumers to change their behavior and an
education process would assist with that effort. It would allow smaller retailers who may have stocks of
single-use plastic bags an opportunity to use those bags, give larger retailers time to train their employees
and remind consumers to bring their bags into the store.
THE VOTE ON THE AMENDMENT CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Council President Wilson commented he considered himself to be fairly green, a former trustee of
Washington Conservation Voters and a current trustee of the Cascade Land Conservancy. He recognized
Councilmember Peterson for moving the conversation forward in a very progressive manner. He referred
to the six tasks on the Council’s Sustainability Agenda that all Councilmembers were assisting with. He
was proud that Edmonds was having this conversation. To those who suggest the Council should be
focusing on the economy, he assured the Council was focused on the economy, doing whatever possible
to ensure the City remained on stable footing.
Council President Wilson recalled one of the reasons the Council chose sustainability as its focus was it
had little to no financial impact and could also be an economic driver. He was supportive of a ban on
plastic in concept and was open to exploring it. He pointed out the Council’s sustainability agenda stated
the Council would consider a plastic bag ban. The Council was considering three ordinances to ban
plastic bags and Councilmember Bernheim proposed an ordinance that would institute a per bag fee.
Seattle chose not to ban plastic bags because it would significantly increase CO2 emissions. He
commented in economics there were situations where the price did not adequately reflect the cost. A free
bag did not reflect the cost to the grocery store and to the environment. He preferred to have a fee on
plastic bags but the City did not have adequate code enforcement staff and he agreed it may be
uncomfortable for retailers.
Council President Wilson agreed with Councilmember Wambolt that this had been a useful exercise but it
had run its course. He preferred to wait to see the outcome of Seattle’s vote. He commented although
San Francisco voted to ban plastic bags, one representative indicated if he were to vote today, he would
not vote to approve a ban.
UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION CARRIED (4-2), COUNCILMEMBERS ORVIS, PLUNKETT,
PETERSON AND OLSON IN FAVOR; AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT WILSON AND
COUNCILMEMBER WAMBOLT OPPOSED.
6A. CONSENT AGENDA ITEM G: ORDINANCE ADOPTING NEW CHAPTERS AND REPEALING
CERTAIN CHAPTERS IN TITLE 20 ECDC RELATING TO PROCEDURES FOR APPROVING
LAND USE DEVELOPMENT PERMITS; AMENDING VARIOUS ECDC SECTIONS THAT
REFERENCE SECTIONS IN REPEALED CHAPTERS IN TITLE 20 ECDC.
COUNCIL PRESIDENT WILSON MOVED FOR APPROVAL OF THE PROPOSED
ORDINANCE. MOTION DIED FOR LACK OF A SECOND.
Council President Wilson inquired about the votes regarding the ordinance at last week’s meeting.
Planning Manager Rob Chave recalled there were two 4-3 votes, the first to return the Council to quasi
Packet Page 13 of 393
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
June 2, 2009
Page 11
judicial matters as is done today, and the second to allow written comment only for quasi judicial closed
record reviews. This ordinance incorporates both of those items.
Councilmember Orvis commented there appeared to be a 3-way split among Councilmembers with regard
to, 1) closed record review with oral comments, 2) closed record review with written comment, and 3) not
having the Council involved in quasi judicial reviews.
Council President Wilson commented this version of the ordinance reflects the direction the Council gave
to staff to retain the Council in closed record reviews.
Councilmember Plunkett commented some Councilmembers did not support requiring written argument
at the close record review and he recalled an amendment made to last week to allow oral argument failed.
Mayor Haakenson asked the outcome if the Council did not approve the ordinance. Mr. Chave answered
the current code would continue to be followed.
Council President Wilson asked how long staff had been working on the changes to Title 20. Mr. Snyder
answered staff began the revision the process in October 2008.
Councilmember Plunkett observed there were other aspects of the rewrite in addition to quasi judicial
review and oral versus written comment. Mr. Snyder agreed there was a great deal more than that; it was
an attempt to synthesize four chapters in the code.
Council President Wilson read from last week’s minutes: Councilmember Orvis moved, seconded by
Councilmember Plunkett, to direct staff to bring back a revised ordinance in which Table C is revised to
reflect the Council’s current authority. Motion carried 6-1, Councilmember Wambolt voting no.
Councilmember Orvis pointed out last week’s minutes also reflect his statement that he would not support
the ordinance unless it allowed oral public comment.
COUNCILMEMBER ORVIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PLUNKETT, TO
APPROVE ITEM G WITH THE AMENDMENT OF ADDING ORAL PUBLIC COMMENT.
COUNCIL PRESIDENT WILSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PETERSON,
TO AMEND TO REQUIRE ALL ARGUMENT IN A CLOSED RECORD REVIEW BEFORE
COUNCIL BE WRITTEN.
Council President Wilson commented the vote on this motion last week was 4-3, with Councilmembers
Wambolt, Olson, Peterson and himself in the majority and Councilmembers Orvis, Plunkett and
Bernheim in the minority.
UPON ROLL CALL, THE AMENDMENT CARRIED (4-2), COUNCIL PRESIDENT WILSON
AND COUNCILMEMBERS OLSON, PETERSON, AND WAMBOLT IN FAVOR; AND
COUNCILMEMBERS ORVIS AND PLUNKETT OPPOSED.
UPON ROLL CALL, THE MAIN MOTION TIED (3-3), COUNCIL PRESIDENT WILSON AND
COUNCILMEMBERS OLSON AND PETERSON IN FAVOR; AND COUNCILMEMBERS
WAMBOLT, ORVIS AND PLUNKETT OPPOSED.
Council President Wilson asked Councilmember Wambolt what he would like changed. Councilmember
Wambolt advised he preferred to have the quasi judicial hearing before the Hearing Examiner. If quasi
Packet Page 14 of 393
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
June 2, 2009
Page 12
judicial closed record reviews were before the Council, he wanted the argument in writing rather than
oral.
Council President Wilson asked Councilmember Orvis and Councilmember Plunkett what they wanted
changed. Councilmember Orvis answered he wanted the Council involved in closed record appeals and
to allow oral comment. Mr. Snyder clarified only parties of record were allowed to speak during a closed
record review. He explained neither Mayor Haakenson nor he liked to interrupt speakers during a closed
record review to object to testimony. He suggested including language that would allow parities of record
to make brief oral presentations to the Council and place the burden of objecting to matters outside the
record on the parties.
Council President Wilson commented he did not find oral testimony appropriate because it placed the
Council as well as the petitioners in jeopardy because no new information could be introduced at the
closed record review. He suggested the only way to achieve four votes may be to return to the original
motion that required hearings be held before the Hearing Examiner. He summarized that would not be
the best policy in his opinion but may be the only policy that the Council could agree to.
COUNCIL PRESIDENT WILSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER WAMBOLT,
TO ADOPT THE ORDINANCE PRESENTED LAST WEEK THAT MOVED THESE ISSUES TO
THE HEARING EXAMINER AND EXCLUDED THE COUNCIL ENTIRELY.
Council President Wilson clarified he only made this motion because he did not believe it was possible to
get four votes any other way.
Councilmember Orvis commented although he read the written records, the oral comments provided a
different perspective. He accused Councilmember Wambolt of taking a stand that required the Council to
do what he wanted or he would not approve the ordinance. He emphasized the public wanted the Council
to be involved in the closed record review.
Councilmember Wambolt commented he simply agreed with the Planning Board’s recommendation.
Councilmember Orvis responded the Planning Board did not cite any Council cases; they simply followed
WCIA’s recommendation. He concluded the best way to get four votes was to allow oral comment and
for the Council to hear quasi judicial reviews.
For the audience, Council President Wilson explained land use decisions were quasi judicial and it was
the recommendation of the professionals that they be decided by a Hearing Examiner. There was a
perception that the Council’s opinion could be swayed by campaign contributions, thus the threat the
Council could jeopardize the decision-making process. He emphasized there was no public hearing when
closed record reviews were before the Council; in that process the two litigants present their case to the
Council and there is no opportunity for comment from anyone other than parties of record. The question
before the Council was whether argument to the Council should be in writing or oral. He summarized the
role of the parties of record did not change, the only change was their comments would be in writing.
Councilmember Orvis asserted passage of this ordinance would allow a developer who did not want to
obey the rules to apply for a variance. The appellant could then make their case to the Hearing Examiner
and under the existing regulations, the Hearing Examiner’s decision could be appealed to the Council.
The proposed ordinance did not allow appeals to the Council; they would be to Superior Court which
could cost the appellant $20,000. Without oral argument the public was shut out and their public officials
were inaccessible. He commented the reason appeal courts hear oral argument was because oral
argument provided a different perspective. He summarized when oral argument was lost, the Council lost
the ability to make a good decision.
Packet Page 15 of 393
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
June 2, 2009
Page 13
Councilmember Plunkett commented land use decisions were the most difficult but most important
decisions in a community. Placing more land use decisions in the hands of judges, hearing examiners,
staff and attorneys was not what the citizens of Edmonds want. The citizens of Edmonds want land use
decisions heard by the City Council. He agreed oral testimony added flavor and context that was not
provided via written comments which is the reason judges hear oral argument. He commended the
Planning Board for doing a thorough job examining information provided by AWC, pointing out they did
not examine any Council decisions. The Planning Board also made several inflammatory comments
about quasi judicial decisions by Council but none related to cases heard by this Council. He concluded
the Council had been judicious and effective in their quasi judicial hearings, oral arguments were
exceedingly important, and the public preferred to have the Council hear land use decisions.
Council President Wilson commented everyone needed compromise; he was willing to be the fourth vote
to have the Council hear quasi judicial appeals or to take the Council out of that process. Unless the
Council was willing to compromise, this ordinance would at least be a step forward.
UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION CARRIED 4-2, COUNCIL PRESIDENT WILSON, AND
COUNCILMEMBERS PETERSON, WAMBOLT AND OLSON IN FAVOR; AND
COUNCILMEMBERS ORVIS AND PLUNKETT OPPOSED.
6B. AUDIENCE COMMENTS
George Murray, Edmonds, commented by their action the Council had cut the public out of the hearing
before the City Council. He agreed with Mr. Snyder’s recommendation to take this issue out of Title 20
and continue discussing it. He urged Councilmember Peterson to state his position before votes were
taken. Next, he referred to the presentation of the Transportation Plan to the Planning Board. The Plan
has funding requirements of $106 million and potential revenue of $36 million. The Planning Board
asked staff to prioritize projects within available funds. Also at that Planning Board meeting, a consultant
reported on improvements that could be made to Yost Park. He expressed his disappointment in the
Council’s action, concluding it was the wrong decision on an important issue.
Adrienne Fraley-Monillas, Edmonds, commented on the passion many citizens have for issues. As a
Board Member of the South County Senior Center, she announced two fundraising events on June 13, a
Red Hot Patio Sale where the public could purchase gently used items between 9:00 and 2:00 and an
Italian dinner with a view and silent auction. She invited the public to attend and/or volunteer at both
events. Donations can also be mailed to the South Sound Senior Center or online at SCSCEdm.org.
Dave Page, Edmonds, assured he did not favor additional government, he preferred limited government,
noting the City’s government was enough. He suggested forming a Sunset/Scrub Committee to purge the
code of laws that no longer served their purpose. As an example of how complex government has
become, he explained 30 years ago he could provide the Planning Department with a legal description and
have a survey done and have a dividable lot created within three weeks. This is now a five-step process
that takes an average of a year and costs thousands. He recalled a project that required a second ADB
review due to a change in the plant materials.
Al Rutledge, Edmonds, provided the Council a 10-page development package given to the Parks &
Recreation Department in 2002 and suggested $440,000 be added to the proposed levy. He referred to
Seattle’s “Parks for All,” a 10-year $198 million levy. With regard to land use decisions, he preferred the
Council remain in the process.
Packet Page 16 of 393
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
June 2, 2009
Page 14
Diane Buckshnis, Edmonds, commented once the public became aware of what was happening with
regard to Chapter 20, they would demand changes. She expressed concern with the comment that
campaign contributions could be used to sway a Councilmember. She recalled on March 17 she testified
regarding Chapter 20 and the matrix she received from staff that indicated the Council would be removed
from shoreline substantial development and shoreline variances. She referred to the March 5, 2009 Port
Commission minutes regarding analysis of a joint development opportunity with the Washington State
ferry terminals and the potential development of the Skippers and Antique Mall properties that would
include height limits to a six story mixed use project. She pointed out with the passage of Chapter 20,
that process could occur and the Council would have no opportunity for input because those matters
would be considered by the Hearing Examiner. She concluded the public was not aware of the
importance of this Chapter and she preferred the Council had not taken action on Chapter 20 tonight.
Rich Senderoff, Edmonds, recalled Council President Wilson stating last year that he was embarrassed
by the Council because they were unable to reach a decision. Dr. Senderoff was embarrassed by the
Council voting against oversight, Council discretion and public transparency. He emphasized the
importance of land use decisions in shaping the future of the City and questioned how the Council could
pass that responsibility on to the Hearing Examiner. He understood the public could not speak to the
Council during a closed record review and that the Council must follow the law. However, as the Council
made decisions on quasi judicial matters, they had the ability to pass legislation to close a loophole or
clarify something that was unanticipated. He concluded the issue was public oversight and transparency.
He expressed concern with the Council flip-flopping on such an important issue. He agreed with Mr.
Murray that Mr. Peterson should state his position.
Michael Young, Edmonds, recognized that he lived in a representative democracy and could not control
all aspects of his life. Councilmembers were elected to control some aspects and he respected that they
were not experts in all things. He suggested audience members may need to defer to those with more
expertise than simply passion. Whether he agreed or disagreed with the Council’s decisions, he respected
that a great deal of thought went into their decisions.
7. MAYOR'S COMMENTS
Mayor Haakenson wished Councilmember Plunkett a Happy Birthday yesterday. He next announced the
UW Washington women won the national softball championship this eveing.
8. COUNCIL COMMENTS
Council President Wilson highlighted on the Consent Agenda the Council passed an ordinance creating a
Citizens Economic Development Commission. This Commission was the result of efforts to get the City
on stable financial footing and particularly comments and recommendations by the Citizens Levy Review
Committee. Each Councilmember will appoint two members and the Mayor will appoint three. A
general application is available in the Council office for any citizen interested in applying or citizens may
contact Councilmembers directly. The Council will appoint the members of the Commission at the July 7
meeting. He requested Councilmembers have their appointments ready by July 7.
Councilmember Peterson reported he accepted Councilmember Bernheim’s challenge to visit the
Edmonds Food Bank. He remarked on their incredible operation and the staggering increase in the
number of people served this year compared to last year. He urged the public to get involved in helping
people in Edmonds who were homeless and hungry.
Packet Page 17 of 393
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
June 2, 2009
Page 15
Councilmember Plunkett complimented the audience for their passionate and well informed comments
regarding plastic bags as well as quasi judicial matters. He thanked the audience for participating and for
their dedication to the community.
Councilmember Wambolt referred to a comment made by Ms. Buckshnis regarding 6-story buildings on
the Antique Mall property, recalling a 6-story parking garage was contemplated by Washington State
Ferries but that idea was killed some time ago. He commented although the Council voted on Title 20, it
could be reconsidered if the change in the process became problematic.
Councilmember Orvis clarified the Council could not go back and make changes to decisions that had
already been made by the Hearing Examiner. Councilmember Wambolt agreed changes would not affect
a project that had already been approved.
Mayor Haakenson requested Mr. Chave provide the Council the number of closed record review matters
held during the past four years compared to the number of building permit applications.
9. ADJOURN
With no further business, the Council meeting was adjourned at 9:40 p.m.
Packet Page 18 of 393
AM-2341 2.C.
Approval of Claim Checks and Payroll Direct Deposit and Checks
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:06/16/2009
Submitted By:Debbie Karber, Administrative Services
Submitted For:Kathleen Junglov Time:Consent
Department:Administrative Services Type:Action
Review Committee:
Committee Action:Approved for Consent Agenda
Information
Subject Title
Approval of claim checks #112046 through #112198 for $1,137,894.95 dated June 4, 2009, and
claim checks #112199 through #112370 for $913,671.92 dated May 11, 2009. Approval of
payroll direct deposits and checks #48121 through #48178 for the period May 16, 2009 through
May 31, 2009 in the amount of $828,056.68.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Approval of claim checks and payroll direct deposits and checks.
Previous Council Action
N/A
Narrative
In accordance with the State statutes, City payments must be approved by the City Council.
Ordinance #2896 delegates this approval to the Council President who reviews and recommends
either approval or non-approval of expenditures.
Fiscal Impact
Fiscal Year:2009
Revenue:
Expenditure:$2,879,623.55
Fiscal Impact:
Claims: $2,051,566.87
Payroll: $ 828,056.68
Attachments
Link: Claim cks 6-4-09
Link: Claim cks 6-11-09
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 Admin Services Kathleen Junglov 06/11/2009 12:06 PM APRV
2 City Clerk Sandy Chase 06/11/2009 12:11 PM APRV
Packet Page 19 of 393
3 Mayor Gary Haakenson 06/11/2009 12:13 PM APRV
4 Final Approval Sandy Chase 06/11/2009 01:40 PM APRV
Form Started By: Debbie
Karber
Started On: 06/11/2009 11:39
AM
Final Approval Date: 06/11/2009
Packet Page 20 of 393
06/04/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
1
10:22:48AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112046 6/4/2009 041695 3M XAM3522 TP58214 Street - ~
Street - ~
111.000.653.542.640.310.00 318.75
Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.640.310.00 30.28
Street - Roll Black 30"x50YDTP58216
Street - Roll Black 30"x50YD
111.000.653.542.640.310.00 279.60
Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.640.310.00 26.56
Total :655.19
112047 6/4/2009 065052 AARD PEST CONTROL 268701 RODENT CONTROL
MEADOWDALE CC~
001.000.640.576.800.480.00 82.12
Total :82.12
112048 6/4/2009 066054 ADIX'S BED & BATH FOR DOGS AND JUNE 2009 ANIMAL BOARDING FOR 6/09 EDMONDS PD
ANIMAL BOARDING FOR 06/09
001.000.410.521.700.410.00 2,032.66
Total :2,032.66
112049 6/4/2009 064246 ALS LABORATORY GROUP 32377 PW Soil Analysis
PW Soil Analysis
411.000.652.542.900.410.00 480.00
Total :480.00
112050 6/4/2009 001430 AMERICAN RED CROSS 3657 Fac Maint - CPR Cert Training for - ~
Fac Maint - CPR Cert Training for - ~
001.000.651.519.920.490.00 344.00
Total :344.00
112051 6/4/2009 066025 ANDERSON, ANGIE ANDERSON0530 PLAZA ROOM MONITOR
PLAZA ROOM MONITOR~
001.000.640.574.100.410.00 330.00
1Page:
Packet Page 21 of 393
06/04/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
2
10:22:48AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :330.001120516/4/2009 066025 066025 ANDERSON, ANGIE
112052 6/4/2009 069751 ARAMARK 655-4301276 UNIFORM SERVICES
PARK MAINTENANCE UNIFORM SERVICES
001.000.640.576.800.240.00 34.04
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.240.00 3.23
Total :37.27
112053 6/4/2009 069751 ARAMARK 655-4293519 PW Mats
PW Mats
001.000.650.519.910.410.00 1.75
PW Mats
111.000.653.542.900.410.00 6.65
PW Mats
411.000.652.542.900.410.00 6.65
PW Mats
411.000.654.534.800.410.00 6.65
PW Mats
411.000.655.535.800.410.00 6.65
PW Mats
511.000.657.548.680.410.00 6.65
Sales Tax
001.000.650.519.910.410.00 0.17
Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.900.410.00 0.63
Sales Tax
411.000.652.542.900.410.00 0.63
Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.410.00 0.63
Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.410.00 0.63
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.410.00 0.64
2Page:
Packet Page 22 of 393
06/04/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
3
10:22:48AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112053 6/4/2009 (Continued)069751 ARAMARK
Street/Storm Uniform Svc655-4293520
Street/Storm Uniform Svc
111.000.653.542.900.240.00 3.51
Street/Storm Uniform Svc
411.000.652.542.900.240.00 3.51
Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.900.240.00 0.34
Sales Tax
411.000.652.542.900.240.00 0.33
Fleet Uniform Svc655-4293521
Fleet Uniform Svc
511.000.657.548.680.240.00 15.00
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.240.00 1.43
Fac Maint Uniform Svc655-4301277
Fac Maint Uniform Svc
001.000.651.519.920.240.00 40.44
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.240.00 3.84
3Page:
Packet Page 23 of 393
06/04/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
4
10:22:48AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112053 6/4/2009 (Continued)069751 ARAMARK
PW MATS655-4305648
PW MATS
001.000.650.519.910.410.00 1.75
PW MATS
111.000.653.542.900.410.00 6.65
PW MATS
411.000.652.542.900.410.00 6.65
PW MATS
411.000.654.534.800.410.00 6.65
PW MATS
411.000.655.535.800.410.00 6.65
PW MATS
511.000.657.548.680.410.00 6.65
Sales Tax
001.000.650.519.910.410.00 0.17
Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.900.410.00 0.63
Sales Tax
411.000.652.542.900.410.00 0.63
Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.410.00 0.63
Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.410.00 0.63
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.410.00 0.64
Total :145.06
112054 6/4/2009 072686 AUTO ADDITIONS INC 23220 Unit 9 - Halogen bulbs
Unit 9 - Halogen bulbs
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 52.00
Freight
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 6.81
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 5.58
4Page:
Packet Page 24 of 393
06/04/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
5
10:22:48AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :64.391120546/4/2009 072686 072686 AUTO ADDITIONS INC
112055 6/4/2009 070305 AUTOMATIC FUNDS TRANSFER 50519 OUT SOURCING OF UTILITY BILLS
UB Outsourcing area #600 Printing
411.000.652.542.900.490.00 32.36
UB Outsourcing area #600 Printing
411.000.654.534.800.490.00 32.36
UB Outsourcing area #600 Printing
411.000.655.535.800.490.00 32.45
UB Outsourcing area #600 Postage
411.000.654.534.800.420.00 108.62
Sales Tax
411.000.652.542.900.490.00 3.07
Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.490.00 3.07
Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.490.00 3.09
UB Outsourcing area #600 Postage
411.000.655.535.800.420.00 108.61
Total :323.63
112056 6/4/2009 069076 BACKGROUND INVESTIGATIONS INC COE0509 Background check services
Background check services
001.000.220.516.100.410.00 325.00
Total :325.00
112057 6/4/2009 061659 BAILEY'S TRADITIONAL TAEKWON BAILEY11014 TAEKWON DO CLASSES
TAEKWON DO #11014
001.000.640.575.540.410.00 599.20
TAEKWON DO #11010
001.000.640.575.540.410.00 900.90
Total :1,500.10
112058 6/4/2009 070992 BANC OF AMERICA LEASING 011005667 Canon 5870 copier lease (7/1 - 7/31/09)
5Page:
Packet Page 25 of 393
06/04/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
6
10:22:48AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112058 6/4/2009 (Continued)070992 BANC OF AMERICA LEASING
Canon 5870 copier lease (7/1 - 7/31/09)
001.000.610.519.700.450.00 101.35
Canon 5870 copier lease (7/1 - 7/31/09)
001.000.220.516.100.450.00 101.32
Canon 5870 copier lease (7/1 - 7/31/09)
001.000.210.513.100.450.00 101.33
Supply charge
001.000.610.519.700.450.00 25.01
Supply charge
001.000.220.516.100.450.00 25.00
Supply charge
001.000.210.513.100.450.00 24.99
Sales Tax
001.000.610.519.700.450.00 12.00
Sales Tax
001.000.220.516.100.450.00 12.00
Sales Tax
001.000.210.513.100.450.00 12.00
Total :415.00
112059 6/4/2009 066238 BARNETT IMPLEMENT 02 1215223 Water Dept Lawn Tractor - V Belt
Water Dept Lawn Tractor - V Belt
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 35.98
Freight
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 10.25
Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 3.98
Total :50.21
112060 6/4/2009 065343 BAY TROPHIES 39465 OPS SUPPLIES
6Page:
Packet Page 26 of 393
06/04/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7
10:22:48AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112060 6/4/2009 (Continued)065343 BAY TROPHIES
PAS tags
001.000.510.522.200.310.00 32.50
Freight
001.000.510.522.200.310.00 3.00
Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.200.310.00 3.02
Total :38.52
112061 6/4/2009 066891 BEACON PUBLISHING INC 7164 Aquatic Manager, #09-19 ad
Aquatic Manager, #09-19 ad
001.000.220.516.100.440.00 22.40
Total :22.40
112062 6/4/2009 066891 BEACON PUBLISHING INC 1904 POOL ADS
YOST POOL ADS
001.000.640.574.200.440.00 174.00
Total :174.00
112063 6/4/2009 069226 BHC CONSULTANTS LLC 2522 E8GA.Services thru 05/15/09
E8GA.Services thru 05/15/09
412.300.630.594.320.410.00 340.63
Total :340.63
112064 6/4/2009 066673 BILLS BLUEPRINT INC 397997 Fac Maint - Printing
Fac Maint - Printing
001.000.651.519.920.490.00 78.38
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.490.00 7.21
Total :85.59
112065 6/4/2009 070803 BITCO SOFTWARE LLC 294 Prof Serv req by Planning modifications
Prof Serv req by Planning modifications
001.000.620.558.800.410.00 36.25
Total :36.25
112066 6/4/2009 071633 BLACK ROCK CABLE INC 12541 JUNE-09 FIBER LEASE
7Page:
Packet Page 27 of 393
06/04/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
8
10:22:48AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112066 6/4/2009 (Continued)071633 BLACK ROCK CABLE INC
Fiber Lease - 7100 210th St SW to 3000
001.000.310.518.870.450.00 470.00
Franchise fee on Fiber Lease
001.000.310.518.870.450.00 23.50
Total :493.50
112067 6/4/2009 065341 BRIANS UPHOLSTERY 128055 Unit 336 - Upholstery Cover replacement
Unit 336 - Upholstery Cover replacement
511.000.657.548.680.480.00 312.00
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.480.00 26.52
Total :338.52
112068 6/4/2009 072545 BRIGHTON SCHOOL BRIGHTON0529 REFUND FOR RANGER VISIT
REFUND DUE TO SCHEDULING CONFLICT
001.000.000.239.200.000.00 102.75
Total :102.75
112069 6/4/2009 069295 BROWN, CANDY BROWN0609 BIRD NATURALIST CLASSROOM VISITS
APRIL - JUNE 2009~
001.000.640.574.350.410.00 115.50
Total :115.50
112070 6/4/2009 072699 BUCHANAN SERVICES INC 8551 Pump Maintanence
Pump Maintanence
511.000.657.548.680.480.00 205.00
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.480.00 18.25
Total :223.25
112071 6/4/2009 071942 CAMPBELL, JULANN CAMPBELL10897 OIL PAINTING CLASSES
OIL PAINTING #10897
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 492.80
OIL PAINTING #10898
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 369.60
8Page:
Packet Page 28 of 393
06/04/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
9
10:22:48AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :862.401120716/4/2009 071942 071942 CAMPBELL, JULANN
112072 6/4/2009 072075 CAMPBELL, RICHARD 2009-6-2 ALS PROF SERVICES
May med prgm dir
001.000.510.526.100.410.00 1,725.00
Total :1,725.00
112073 6/4/2009 065171 CARTEGRAPH SYSTEMS INC 30910 Installation & Implementation of Flex
Installation & Implementation of Flex
001.000.310.518.880.410.00 950.00
Total :950.00
112074 6/4/2009 068484 CEMEX / RINKER MATERIALS 9417204720 Asphalt
Asphalt
111.000.653.542.310.310.00 323.34
Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.310.310.00 30.72
Total :354.06
112075 6/4/2009 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY LY144579 ALS SUPPLIES
medical oxygen
001.000.510.526.100.310.00 11.49
Freight
001.000.510.526.100.310.00 17.50
Sales Tax
001.000.510.526.100.310.00 2.75
ALS SUPPLIESLY144580
medical oxygen
001.000.510.526.100.310.00 113.68
Freight
001.000.510.526.100.310.00 17.50
Sales Tax
001.000.510.526.100.310.00 12.45
9Page:
Packet Page 29 of 393
06/04/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
10
10:22:48AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112075 6/4/2009 (Continued)003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY
ALS SUPPLIESLY144582
medical oxygen
001.000.510.526.100.310.00 34.47
Freight
001.000.510.526.100.310.00 17.50
Sales Tax
001.000.510.526.100.310.00 4.93
Total :232.27
112076 6/4/2009 064840 CHAPUT, KAREN E CHAPUT0522 FRIDAY NIGHT OUT
FRIDAY NIGHT OUT #11108
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 89.60
FRIDAY NIGHT OUTCHAPUT0529
FRIDAY NIGHT OUT #11109
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 114.80
Total :204.40
112077 6/4/2009 003710 CHEVRON AND TEXACO BUSINESS 18360593 INV#18360593 ACCT#7898305185 EDMONDS PD
FUEL FOR TRAINING-CARD#1
001.000.410.521.400.430.00 17.56
FUEL FOR TRAINING-CARD#2
001.000.410.521.400.430.00 18.73
FUEL FOR TRAINING-CARD #5
001.000.410.521.400.430.00 82.61
FUEL FOR NARCS VEHICLE
104.000.410.521.210.320.00 157.10
Total :276.00
112078 6/4/2009 066382 CINTAS CORPORATION 460430568 OPS UNIFORMS
Stn. 20
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 127.49
Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 12.11
10Page:
Packet Page 30 of 393
06/04/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
11
10:22:48AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112078 6/4/2009 (Continued)066382 CINTAS CORPORATION
UNIFORMS460434578
Volunteers
001.000.510.522.410.240.00 20.12
Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.410.240.00 1.91
OPS UNIFORMS460434579
Stn. 16
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 119.67
Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 11.37
UNIFORMS460435640
Stn 17 - ALS
001.000.510.526.100.240.00 127.06
Stn 17 - OPS
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 127.05
Sales Tax
001.000.510.526.100.240.00 12.07
Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 12.07
OPS UNIFORMS460435660
Stn. 20
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 127.49
Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 12.11
OPS UNIFORMS460438742
Stn. 16
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 120.71
Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 11.47
UNIFORMS460438743
Volunteers
001.000.510.522.410.240.00 21.16
Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.410.240.00 2.01
11Page:
Packet Page 31 of 393
06/04/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
12
10:22:48AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :865.871120786/4/2009 066382 066382 CINTAS CORPORATION
112079 6/4/2009 069457 CITY OF EDMONDS E6DB.ROW Permit E6DB.Right of Way Permit for
E6DB.Right of Way Permit for
112.200.630.595.330.410.00 260.00
Total :260.00
112080 6/4/2009 019215 CITY OF LYNNWOOD 7027 ALS OPS & PROF SERVS
EMS supplies
001.000.510.526.100.310.00 6,254.81
Admin services fee
001.000.510.526.100.410.00 250.19
Total :6,505.00
112081 6/4/2009 070231 CNR INC 54297 Labor for Call Express Care Upgrade
Labor for Call Express Care Upgrade
001.000.310.518.880.480.00 852.50
Sales Tax
001.000.310.518.880.480.00 75.87
Credit on VW upgrade completed 9/28/0854297 A
Credit on VW upgrade completed 9/28/08
001.000.310.518.880.480.00 -77.50
Sales Tax
001.000.310.518.880.480.00 -6.90
Total :843.97
112082 6/4/2009 004095 COASTWIDE LABORATORIES w2065920 Fac Maint- Supplies - TT, Towels,
Fac Maint- Supplies - TT, Towels,
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 345.15
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 32.79
Fac Maint - Supplies - Cleaners,W2065990
Fac Maint - Supplies - Cleaners,
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 506.67
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 48.13
12Page:
Packet Page 32 of 393
06/04/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
13
10:22:48AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :932.741120826/4/2009 004095 004095 COASTWIDE LABORATORIES
112083 6/4/2009 070300 CODE 4 INC 6826 INV# 6826 BULLETPROOF MIND - FOLEY
BULLETPROOF MIND - FOLEY
001.000.410.521.400.490.00 99.00
Total :99.00
112084 6/4/2009 071308 COLELLA, TERESA COLELLA0529 SOFTBALL FIELD ATTENDANT
SOFTBALL FIELD ATTENDANT @ MEADOWDALE
001.000.640.575.520.410.00 576.00
Total :576.00
112085 6/4/2009 070323 COMCAST 05242009 CEMETERY BUNDLED SERVICES
INTERNET ACCESS FOR CEMETERY BUNDLED
130.000.640.536.200.420.00 113.12
Total :113.12
112086 6/4/2009 069888 CONROY, LINDA CONROY10807 BASKETRY CLASS
BASKETRY: PINE NEEDLE~
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 140.00
Total :140.00
112087 6/4/2009 062891 COOK PAGING WA 7538860 pagers-water
pagers-water
411.000.654.534.800.420.00 3.95
Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.420.00 0.29
Total :4.24
112088 6/4/2009 005965 CUES INC 306958 Unit eq39wr - New 2009 Sewer TV Truck-
Unit eq39wr - New 2009 Sewer TV Truck-
511.100.657.594.480.640.00 160,438.00
Sales Tax
511.100.657.594.480.640.00 14,278.98
Total :174,716.98
112089 6/4/2009 061570 DAY WIRELESS SYSTEMS - 16 143791 INV#143791 - EDMONDS PD
13Page:
Packet Page 33 of 393
06/04/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
14
10:22:48AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112089 6/4/2009 (Continued)061570 DAY WIRELESS SYSTEMS - 16
REPAIR/CAL #GHD-03630 16
001.000.410.521.220.480.00 303.42
Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.220.480.00 27.91
Total :331.33
112090 6/4/2009 029900 DEPT OF RETIREMENT SYSTEMS May 2009 MAY 2009 DRS
May 2009 DRS
811.000.000.231.540.000.00 235,609.60
Total :235,609.60
112091 6/4/2009 047610 DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION RE41JA6590L004 E7AC.State Svcs thru April 2009
E7AC.State Svcs thru April 2009
112.200.630.595.330.410.00 629.08
Total :629.08
112092 6/4/2009 068591 DOUBLEDAY, MICHAEL 052009 STATE LOBBYIST FOR MAY 2009
State lobbyist charges for May 2009
001.000.610.519.700.410.00 2,391.25
Total :2,391.25
112093 6/4/2009 070244 DUANE HARTMAN & ASSOCIATES INC 09-1554.1 E6MA.Services thru 05/24/09
E6MA.Services thru 05/24/09
129.000.240.595.700.410.00 785.15
Total :785.15
112094 6/4/2009 071596 EBORALL, STEVE EBORALL10907 ART CLUB
ART CLUB #10907
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 151.20
Total :151.20
112095 6/4/2009 069523 EDMONDS P&R YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP SHAH0603 YOUTH SCHOLARSHIPS
YOUTH SCHOLARSHIPS FOR SWIM LESSONS
122.000.640.574.100.490.00 260.00
Total :260.00
14Page:
Packet Page 34 of 393
06/04/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
15
10:22:48AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112096 6/4/2009 008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION 3-01808 LIFT STATION #11
LIFT STATION #11
411.000.655.535.800.470.00 22.06
MEADOWDALE CLUB HOUSE3-03575
MEADOWDALE CLUB HOUSE
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 187.40
LIFT STATION #123-07525
LIFT STATION #12
411.000.655.535.800.470.00 50.58
LIFT STATION #153-07709
LIFT STATION #15
411.000.655.535.800.470.00 22.06
LIFT STATION #43-09350
LIFT STATION #4
411.000.655.535.800.470.00 63.82
LIFT STATION #103-09800
LIFT STATION #10
411.000.655.535.800.470.00 31.52
LIFT STATION #93-29875
LIFT STATION #9
411.000.655.535.800.470.00 33.41
Total :410.85
112097 6/4/2009 008812 ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINES 045522 ADMIN MAINT
copier maint
001.000.510.522.100.480.00 111.35
Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.100.480.00 10.58
Total :121.93
112098 6/4/2009 069117 EMERALD SERVICES INC 482714 Credit from 7/25/08 for Fleet Recycle
Credit from 7/25/08 for Fleet Recycle
511.000.657.548.680.480.00 -40.00
Fleet Recycle Fees498589
Fleet Recycle Fees
511.000.657.548.680.490.00 81.25
15Page:
Packet Page 35 of 393
06/04/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
16
10:22:48AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112098 6/4/2009 (Continued)069117 EMERALD SERVICES INC
Fleet Recycle Fees531838
Fleet Recycle Fees
511.000.657.548.680.490.00 114.80
Total :156.05
112099 6/4/2009 071967 ENG, STEPHEN ENG11001 TAEKWON DO CLASSES
TAEKWON DO - BEGINNING~
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 225.70
Total :225.70
112100 6/4/2009 066378 FASTENAL COMPANY WAMOU16678 STREET - Supplies
STREET - Supplies
111.000.653.542.310.310.00 90.00
Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.310.310.00 8.55
Total :98.55
112101 6/4/2009 009895 FELDMAN, JAMES A 053109 PUBLIC DEFENDER FEE
PUBLIC DEFENDER FEE
001.000.390.512.520.410.00 10,290.00
Total :10,290.00
112102 6/4/2009 072493 FIRSTLINE COMMUNICATIONS INC 5270901 ACD Agent & Mailbox License
Labor & Trip Charge
001.000.310.518.880.410.00 355.00
Sales Tax
001.000.310.518.880.490.00 45.79
Sales Tax
001.000.310.518.880.410.00 33.73
ACD Agent & Mailbox License
001.000.310.518.880.490.00 482.00
Total :916.52
112103 6/4/2009 070855 FLEX PLAN SERVICES INC 138975 May 2009 Section 132 and 125 plan fees
May 2009 Section 132 and 125 plan fees
001.000.220.516.100.410.00 80.00
16Page:
Packet Page 36 of 393
06/04/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
17
10:22:48AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :80.001121036/4/2009 070855 070855 FLEX PLAN SERVICES INC
112104 6/4/2009 018495 GLACIER NORTHWEST 90743418 Street - Concrete
Street - Concrete
111.000.653.542.610.310.00 359.13
Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.610.310.00 34.12
Concrete90746233
Concrete
111.000.653.542.610.310.00 359.13
Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.610.310.00 34.12
Total :786.50
112105 6/4/2009 063137 GOODYEAR AUTO SERVICE CENTER 089633 Unit 134 - Tire
Unit 134 - Tire
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 257.96
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 24.51
Total :282.47
112106 6/4/2009 012560 HACH COMPANY 6211508 Water Quality - Syringe filters,
Water Quality - Syringe filters,
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 198.78
Freight
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 15.95
Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 20.40
Total :235.13
112107 6/4/2009 070515 HARLEY DAVIDSON OF SEATTLE 259264 Unit 582 - Returns
Unit 582 - Returns
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 -220.61
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 -20.97
17Page:
Packet Page 37 of 393
06/04/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
18
10:22:48AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112107 6/4/2009 (Continued)070515 HARLEY DAVIDSON OF SEATTLE
Unit 582 - Oil, Spark Plugs, Air259275
Unit 582 - Oil, Spark Plugs, Air
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 417.71
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 39.66
Total :215.79
112108 6/4/2009 012900 HARRIS FORD INC FOCS256303 Unit 716 - Service Repairs
Unit 716 - Service Repairs
511.000.657.548.680.480.00 480.00
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.480.00 45.60
Unit 46 - Service RepairITCS255798
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.480.00 31.32
Unit 46 - Service Repair
511.000.657.548.680.480.00 329.66
Total :886.58
112109 6/4/2009 012900 HARRIS FORD INC 97738 Unit 134 - Switch Assembly, Recepticle
Unit 134 - Switch Assembly, Recepticle
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 180.72
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 17.17
Unit 46 - Air cleaner filter97927
Unit 46 - Air cleaner filter
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 38.98
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 3.70
Total :240.57
112110 6/4/2009 064576 HAUTH, TELMA 051709 MANAGERS CONFERENCE TRAVEL EXPENSE
MANAGERS CONFERENCE TRAVEL EXPENSE
001.000.230.512.500.430.00 71.85
18Page:
Packet Page 38 of 393
06/04/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
19
10:22:48AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :71.851121106/4/2009 064576 064576 HAUTH, TELMA
112111 6/4/2009 010900 HD FOWLER CO INC I2515354 Water Supplies - 3/4" Joint Adapters,
Water Supplies - 3/4" Joint Adapters,
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 1,594.10
Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 151.44
Water Supplies - 3/4" Valve x QuickI2528325
Water Supplies - 3/4" Valve x Quick
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 409.20
Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 38.88
Total :2,193.62
112112 6/4/2009 006030 HDR ENGINEERING INC 105729-H E4GA.Services thru 04/25/09
E4GA.Services thru 04/25/09
412.300.630.594.320.410.00 1,262.48
E4GA.Services thru February 200992438-H rev
E4GA.Services thru February 2009
412.300.630.594.320.410.00 9,006.04
E4GA.Services thru March, 200998903-H
E4GA.Services thru March, 2009
412.300.630.594.320.410.00 10,830.02
Total :21,098.54
112113 6/4/2009 072647 HERRERA ENVIRONMENTAL 20237 E8FD.Services thru 05/01/09
E8FD.Services thru 05/01/09
412.200.630.594.320.410.00 15,648.13
Total :15,648.13
112114 6/4/2009 013350 HIGHLAND, SCOTT E3JC.Pmt 2 E3JC.Services thru 05/22/09
19Page:
Packet Page 39 of 393
06/04/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
20
10:22:48AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112114 6/4/2009 (Continued)013350 HIGHLAND, SCOTT
E3JC.Services thru 05/22/09
412.100.630.594.320.410.00 487.20
E3JC.Services thru 05/29/09
412.100.630.594.320.410.00 663.60
E3JC.Mileage thru 05/29/09
412.100.630.594.320.410.00 31.79
Total :1,182.59
112115 6/4/2009 071739 HOLZWART, JOHN HOLZWART10806 BROOM MAKING CLASS
BROOM MAKING #10806
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 63.00
Total :63.00
112116 6/4/2009 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 2284390 0205
TRAYS, ROLLERS, ETC.
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 31.84
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 3.02
0205569223
BRASS SPRAY
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 7.98
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 0.76
02057580256
TIES
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 17.85
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 1.70
02058038026
STAPLES, STRAPS, ETC.
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 89.84
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 8.53
20Page:
Packet Page 40 of 393
06/04/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
21
10:22:48AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112116 6/4/2009 (Continued)067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES
02059032812
SUPPLIES
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 17.54
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 1.67
02059598306
WOOD FILLER
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 25.94
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 2.46
Total :209.13
112117 6/4/2009 070896 HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 1293 OPS SUPPLIES
stations' supplies
001.000.510.522.200.310.00 337.13
Total :337.13
112118 6/4/2009 070864 IDEARC MEDIA CORP 360002753875 C/A 360000657091
Apr & May 09 Basic e-commerce hosting
001.000.310.518.880.420.00 69.90
C/A 360000764828360002761852
05/09 Web Hosting for Internet
001.000.310.518.880.420.00 34.95
Total :104.85
112119 6/4/2009 070042 IKON FINANCIAL SERVICES 79482663 INV#79482663 ACCT#467070-COMBINED EDMOND
Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.100.450.00 99.28
COPIER RENTAL 05/13 -06/12/09
001.000.410.521.100.450.00 821.73
ADDITIONAL COPIES
001.000.410.521.100.450.00 223.03
Total :1,144.04
112120 6/4/2009 070042 IKON FINANCIAL SERVICES 79507384 COPIER LEASE
21Page:
Packet Page 41 of 393
06/04/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
22
10:22:48AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112120 6/4/2009 (Continued)070042 IKON FINANCIAL SERVICES
RECREATION OFFICE COPIER LEASE
001.000.640.574.100.450.00 532.58
COPIER LEASE79533764
PARK MAINTENANCE COPIER LEASE
001.000.640.576.800.450.00 26.40
Total :558.98
112121 6/4/2009 070042 IKON FINANCIAL SERVICES 79533756 Lease/copies Ikon Recp Copier April-May
Lease/copies Ikon Recp Copier April-May
001.000.620.558.800.450.00 76.30
Lease/copies DSD Lrg Copier April/May79533758
Lease/copies DSD Lrg Copier April/May
001.000.620.558.800.450.00 970.28
Lease/Copies Eng Copier April-May 200979533759
Lease/Copies Eng Copier April-May 2009
001.000.620.558.800.450.00 704.62
Total :1,751.20
112122 6/4/2009 068952 INFINITY INTERNET 2831978 PRESCHOOL INTERNET ACCESS
MEADOWDALE PRESCHOOL INTERNET ACCESS
001.000.640.575.560.420.00 15.00
Total :15.00
112123 6/4/2009 071634 INTEGRA TELECOM 010495174 C/A 010495174
PR1-2 City Phone Service thru 5/25/09
001.000.310.518.880.420.00 947.90
Total :947.90
112124 6/4/2009 069040 INTERSTATE AUTO PARTS c487748 Shop Tools - Genisys Evo Exch K
Shop Tools - Genisys Evo Exch K
511.000.657.548.680.350.00 1,750.00
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.350.00 155.75
22Page:
Packet Page 42 of 393
06/04/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
23
10:22:48AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112124 6/4/2009 (Continued)069040 INTERSTATE AUTO PARTS
Shop Tools- Auto T-Up Bldr Kitc487994
Shop Tools- Auto T-Up Bldr Kit
511.000.657.548.680.350.00 37.79
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.350.00 3.36
Unit eq55po - Cole Herseec489239
Sales Tax
511.100.657.594.480.640.00 6.65
Unit eq55po - Cole Hersee
511.100.657.594.480.640.00 74.76
Shop Supplies - Wiper Bladesc489913
Shop Supplies - Wiper Blades
511.000.657.548.680.311.00 28.60
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.311.00 2.55
Shop Supplies - Wiper Blades, Partsc490519
Shop Supplies - Wiper Blades, Parts
511.000.657.548.680.311.00 111.57
Inventory - Police Rotors, Pads, Disk
511.000.657.548.680.340.40 641.64
Unit 338 - Police Calipers
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 176.54
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.311.00 10.60
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.340.40 60.96
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 16.77
Fleet Parts ReturnC490620
Fleet Parts Return
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 -45.30
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 -4.30
23Page:
Packet Page 43 of 393
06/04/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
24
10:22:48AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112124 6/4/2009 (Continued)069040 INTERSTATE AUTO PARTS
Unit eq54,55,56po - Cole Herseec490742
Unit eq54,55,56po - Cole Hersee
511.100.657.594.480.640.00 149.52
Sales Tax
511.100.657.594.480.640.00 14.20
Total :3,191.66
112125 6/4/2009 069179 INTERWEST CONSTRUCTION INC E3JC.Pmt 1 E3JC.Complete thru 04/30/09
E3JC.Complete thru 04/30/09
412.100.630.594.320.650.00 186,859.78
E3JC.Retainage 1 thru April
412.100.000.223.400.000.00 -8,532.41
E4GA.Complete thru 02/28/09E4GA.Pmt 3
E4GA.Complete thru 02/28/09
412.300.630.594.320.650.00 275,661.24
E4GA.Retainage Pmt 3
412.300.000.223.400.000.00 -12,656.62
Total :441,331.99
112126 6/4/2009 061844 INTL CONF OF POLICE CHAPLAINS 27550 INV#27550 - GAYDOS/EDMONDS PD
ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP/GAYDOS
001.000.410.521.100.490.00 125.00
Total :125.00
112127 6/4/2009 065873 ITE WASHINGTON STATE SECTION Hauss.Annual Mtg B. Hauss.Annual ITE Meeting Registration
B. Hauss.Annual ITE Meeting Registration
001.000.620.532.200.490.00 125.00
Total :125.00
112128 6/4/2009 072199 JONES & STOKES ASSOCIATES INC 0062230 E7AD.Services thru 05/03/09
E7AD.Services thru 05/03/09
112.200.630.595.440.410.00 28,474.00
Total :28,474.00
112129 6/4/2009 070019 JUDICIAL CONF REGISTRAR 060709 JUDGE'S SPRING CONFERENCE
24Page:
Packet Page 44 of 393
06/04/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
25
10:22:48AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112129 6/4/2009 (Continued)070019 JUDICIAL CONF REGISTRAR
JUDGE'S SPRING CONFERENCE
001.000.230.512.500.430.00 40.00
Total :40.00
112130 6/4/2009 066913 KDL HARDWARE SUPPLY INC 399874 Fire Boat - Security Lock
Fire Boat - Security Lock
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 107.61
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 10.22
Street- Supplies399933
Street- Supplies
111.000.653.542.310.310.00 161.60
Freight
111.000.653.542.310.310.00 5.69
Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.310.310.00 15.35
Total :300.47
112131 6/4/2009 068401 KING CO OFFICE OF FINANCE WRIA8-4484 INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT WATERSHED PLANNING
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT WATERSHED PLANNING
411.000.652.542.900.510.00 4,315.33
Total :4,315.33
112132 6/4/2009 066585 KINNEY, DON 5/28/09 OT from sick leave buy back not
OT from sick leave buy back not
001.000.410.521.220.110.00 19.46
Total :19.46
112133 6/4/2009 068396 KPFF CONSULTING ENGINEERS 0509-108246 E8GC.Services thru April, 2009
E8GC.Services thru April, 2009
412.300.630.594.320.410.00 3,220.21
Total :3,220.21
112134 6/4/2009 011050 KROGER FRED MEYER CUSTOMER CHR420317 OPS SUPPLIES
25Page:
Packet Page 45 of 393
06/04/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
26
10:22:48AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112134 6/4/2009 (Continued)011050 KROGER FRED MEYER CUSTOMER CHR
bedding
001.000.510.522.200.310.00 465.78
Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.200.310.00 44.25
Total :510.03
112135 6/4/2009 017050 KWICK'N KLEEN CAR WASH 041309-01A City Car Wash
City Car Wash
511.000.657.548.680.480.00 5.00
City Car Wash04132009-03
City Car Wash
511.000.657.548.680.480.00 10.06
Total :15.06
112136 6/4/2009 017135 LANDAU ASSOCIATES INC 24997 Prof Serv Bldg Div Hammond review
Prof Serv Bldg Div Hammond review
001.000.620.524.100.410.00 840.83
Prof Serv 162nd St Park Review project25049
Prof Serv 162nd St Park Review project
001.000.620.524.100.410.00 495.00
Total :1,335.83
112137 6/4/2009 018760 LUNDS OFFICE ESSENTIALS 101321 ADMIN SUPPLIES
envelopes
001.000.510.522.100.310.00 139.60
Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.100.310.00 13.26
Total :152.86
112138 6/4/2009 069362 MARSHALL, CITA 589 INTERPRETER FEE
INTERPRETER FEE
001.000.230.512.500.410.01 88.25
Total :88.25
112139 6/4/2009 072010 MEISER, GARLAND MEISER0512 PICKLE BALL LEAGUE SUPERVISOR
26Page:
Packet Page 46 of 393
06/04/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
27
10:22:48AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112139 6/4/2009 (Continued)072010 MEISER, GARLAND
SUPERVISOR OF PICKLEBALL LEAGUE @
001.000.640.575.520.410.00 72.00
Total :72.00
112140 6/4/2009 072223 MILLER, DOUG MILLER0429 GYM MONITOR
GYM MONITOR FOR 3 ON 3 BASKETBALL @
001.000.640.575.520.410.00 90.00
Total :90.00
112141 6/4/2009 020900 MILLERS EQUIP & RENT ALL INC 88648 OPS EXPENDABLE TOOLS
saw parts
001.000.510.522.200.359.00 24.17
Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.200.359.00 2.30
Total :26.47
112142 6/4/2009 072746 MURRAY SMITH & ASSOCIATES 09-1030-1 E8JB.Services thru 04/30/09
E8JB.Services thru 04/30/09
412.100.630.594.320.650.00 507.17
Total :507.17
112143 6/4/2009 066236 MURRAY, FRAN MURRAY0518 DISCOVER THE FOREST PROGRAM
DISCOVERY THE FOREST INQUIRY PROGRAM @
001.000.640.574.350.410.00 33.75
Total :33.75
112144 6/4/2009 024302 NELSON PETROLEUM 0403873-IN Fleet Filter Inventory
Fleet Filter Inventory
511.000.657.548.680.340.40 26.86
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.340.40 2.56
Total :29.42
112145 6/4/2009 068451 NORTHEND TRUCK EQUIPMENT INC 1022127 Units eq40wr,eq42wr,eq43wq - Modify
27Page:
Packet Page 47 of 393
06/04/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
28
10:22:48AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112145 6/4/2009 (Continued)068451 NORTHEND TRUCK EQUIPMENT INC
Units eq40wr,eq42wr,eq43wq - Modify
511.100.657.594.480.640.00 3,111.57
Freight
511.100.657.594.480.640.00 94.88
Sales Tax
511.100.657.594.480.640.00 304.61
Total :3,511.06
112146 6/4/2009 061013 NORTHWEST CASCADE INC 0947433 HONEY BUCKET RENTAL
HONEY BUCKET RENTAL:~
001.000.640.576.800.450.00 222.89
Total :222.89
112147 6/4/2009 067868 NW TANK & ENVIRONMENTAL 24378 Fuel Tanks Serviced
Fuel Tanks Serviced
511.000.657.548.680.480.00 830.60
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.480.00 78.91
Total :909.51
112148 6/4/2009 063511 OFFICE MAX INC 922302 INV#922302, ACCT#520437 250POL
HP LASER JET4250 CARTRIDGE
001.000.410.521.210.310.00 223.80
INKCARTRIDGE, CLI-8Y YW
001.000.410.521.910.310.00 11.26
INCARTRIDGE, CLI-8C CYN
001.000.410.521.910.310.00 11.26
INKCARTRIDGE, CLI-8M MA
001.000.410.521.910.310.00 11.26
INKCARTRIDGE, PGI-5BK BK
001.000.410.521.910.310.00 13.78
Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.210.310.00 21.26
Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.910.310.00 4.52
28Page:
Packet Page 48 of 393
06/04/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
29
10:22:48AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :297.141121486/4/2009 063511 063511 OFFICE MAX INC
112149 6/4/2009 063511 OFFICE MAX INC 979775 OFFICE SUPPLIES
ARTS COMMISSION LABELS
117.100.640.573.100.310.00 24.08
Sales Tax
117.100.640.573.100.310.00 2.30
Total :26.38
112150 6/4/2009 063511 OFFICE MAX INC 426812 Pens
Pens
001.000.310.514.230.310.00 19.64
Sales Tax
001.000.310.514.230.310.00 1.87
Address Labels433439
Address Labels
001.000.310.514.230.310.00 23.28
Sales Tax
001.000.310.514.230.310.00 2.21
Fax & Printer Toner / Highlighters952474
Fax & Printer Toner / Highlighters
001.000.310.514.230.310.00 268.06
Sales Tax
001.000.310.514.230.310.00 25.46
Total :340.52
112151 6/4/2009 063511 OFFICE MAX INC 850936 Shredder for Council Office
Shredder for Council Office
001.000.110.511.100.310.00 101.42
Total :101.42
112152 6/4/2009 063511 OFFICE MAX INC 853763 Office Supplies DSD
Office Supplies DSD
001.000.620.558.800.310.00 49.38
29Page:
Packet Page 49 of 393
06/04/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
30
10:22:48AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112152 6/4/2009 (Continued)063511 OFFICE MAX INC
Office Supplies for DSD890118
Office Supplies for DSD
001.000.620.558.800.310.00 34.15
Office Supples DSD959849
Office Supples DSD
001.000.620.558.800.310.00 190.42
Total :273.95
112153 6/4/2009 063511 OFFICE MAX INC 434943 Fac Maint - Ink for Printer
Fac Maint - Ink for Printer
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 134.30
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 12.76
PW Admin Office Supplies - Envelopes,877918
PW Admin Office Supplies - Envelopes,
001.000.650.519.910.310.00 53.57
Sales Tax
001.000.650.519.910.310.00 5.08
WATER QUALITY - LABELS929498
WATER QUALITY - LABELS
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 23.35
PW OFFICE SUPPLIES - LABELS, FILE
001.000.650.519.910.310.00 232.93
Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 2.22
Sales Tax
001.000.650.519.910.310.00 22.13
Total :486.34
112154 6/4/2009 025889 OGDEN MURPHY AND WALLACE 675092 April-09 Litigation Fees
April-09 Litigation Fees
001.000.360.515.100.410.00 21,509.38
30Page:
Packet Page 50 of 393
06/04/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
31
10:22:48AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112154 6/4/2009 (Continued)025889 OGDEN MURPHY AND WALLACE
APRIL 09 RETAINER FEES675094
April 09 Retainer & Itemized Legal Fees
001.000.360.515.100.410.00 16,802.22
April-09 ECDC Legal Fees
001.000.620.558.600.410.00 3,456.90
Total :41,768.50
112155 6/4/2009 025889 OGDEN MURPHY AND WALLACE 675094 Prof Serv Legislative/Council-May 2009
Prof Serv Legislative/Council-May 2009
001.000.110.511.100.410.00 2,680.90
Total :2,680.90
112156 6/4/2009 026015 OLYMPIC BALLET THEATRE OBT060309 TOURISM PROMOTION AGREEMENT
TOURISM PROMOTION AGREEMENT~
123.000.640.573.100.410.00 1,700.00
Total :1,700.00
112157 6/4/2009 063750 ORCA PACIFIC INC 039026 YOST POOL SUPPLIES
YOST POOL SUPPLIES:~
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 44.82
Freight
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 5.67
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 4.79
Total :55.28
112158 6/4/2009 072539 OTAK INC-WASHINGTON 050986557 E8FA.Services thru 05/01/09
E8FA.Services thru 05/01/09
412.200.630.594.320.410.00 3,466.28
Total :3,466.28
112159 6/4/2009 002203 OWEN EQUIPMENT COMPANY 00052992 Unit 138 - Coolant, Water Temp Sender
31Page:
Packet Page 51 of 393
06/04/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
32
10:22:48AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112159 6/4/2009 (Continued)002203 OWEN EQUIPMENT COMPANY
Unit 138 - Coolant, Water Temp Sender
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 120.66
Freight
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 21.49
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 13.50
Total :155.65
112160 6/4/2009 027165 PARKER PAINT MFG. CO.INC.833708 PS & PW Paint Supplies - Paint,
PS & PW Paint Supplies - Paint,
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 64.05
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 6.08
Total :70.13
112161 6/4/2009 007800 PETTY CASH tc petty mileage reimb- march, April- L. Carl
32Page:
Packet Page 52 of 393
06/04/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
33
10:22:48AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112161 6/4/2009 (Continued)007800 PETTY CASH
mileage reimb- march, April- L. Carl
001.000.210.513.100.430.00 36.87
ferry for class-Beard
001.000.510.522.400.430.00 21.15
coffee, supplies, 2nd floor
001.000.620.558.800.310.00 54.08
registration, mileage, parking-English
001.000.620.532.200.490.00 10.00
registration, mileage, parking-English
001.000.620.532.200.430.00 46.68
hand cleaner for truck
001.000.620.524.100.490.00 2.19
contractor workshop suuplies-Bjorback
001.000.620.524.100.490.00 29.45
sccfoa meeting-Chase
001.000.250.514.300.490.00 12.00
mileage reimb, conference-Cocia
001.000.620.558.600.430.00 30.36
parking for training-Waters
001.000.310.518.880.430.00 15.00
sccfoa meeting-Karber
001.000.310.514.230.490.00 12.00
mileage reimb-Machuga
001.000.620.558.600.430.00 27.83
mileage reimb-cocia
001.000.620.558.600.430.00 44.18
Total :341.79
112162 6/4/2009 071811 PONY MAIL BOX & BUSINESS CTR 176592 Water/Sewer/Street/Storm - Dept of L&I
33Page:
Packet Page 53 of 393
06/04/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
34
10:22:48AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112162 6/4/2009 (Continued)071811 PONY MAIL BOX & BUSINESS CTR
Water/Sewer/Street/Storm - Dept of L&I
111.000.653.542.900.420.00 2.17
Water/Sewer/Street/Storm - Dept of L&I
411.000.652.542.900.420.00 2.17
Water/Sewer/Street/Storm - Dept of L&I
411.000.654.534.800.420.00 2.17
Water/Sewer/Street/Storm - Dept of L&I
411.000.655.535.800.420.00 2.18
Water/Sewer/Street/Storm - Dept of L&I176678
Water/Sewer/Street/Storm - Dept of L&I
111.000.653.542.900.420.00 2.16
Water/Sewer/Street/Storm - Dept of L&I
411.000.652.542.900.420.00 2.16
Water/Sewer/Street/Storm - Dept of L&I
411.000.654.534.800.420.00 2.16
Water/Sewer/Street/Storm - Dept of L&I
411.000.655.535.800.420.00 2.14
Total :17.31
112163 6/4/2009 071184 PROCOM 2009-1296 PROF SERV FIBER OPTIC PROJ
Apr-09 Prof Serv Fiber Optic Proj
001.000.310.518.870.410.00 2,812.50
Total :2,812.50
112164 6/4/2009 064088 PROTECTION ONE 31146525 24 HOUR ALARM MONITORING -CITY HALL
24 hour alarm monitoring-CH~
001.000.651.519.920.420.00 36.75
Total :36.75
112165 6/4/2009 046900 PUGET SOUND ENERGY 7918807004 YOST POOL
YOST POOL
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 1,517.22
Total :1,517.22
112166 6/4/2009 046900 PUGET SOUND ENERGY 0101874006 LIBRARY
34Page:
Packet Page 54 of 393
06/04/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
35
10:22:48AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112166 6/4/2009 (Continued)046900 PUGET SOUND ENERGY
LIBRARY
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 108.26
PARK & BUILDING MAINTENANCE SHOP0230757007
PARK & BUILDING MAINTENANCE SHOP
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 234.91
LIFT STATION #71916766007
LIFT STATION #7
411.000.655.535.800.470.00 33.81
PUBLIC SAFETY-POLICE,CRT & COUNCIL2753166004
PUBLIC SAFETY-POLICE,CRT & COUNCEL
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 495.08
Public Works2776365005
Public Works
001.000.650.519.910.470.00 24.69
Public Works
111.000.653.542.900.470.00 93.81
Public Works
411.000.654.534.800.470.00 93.81
Public Works
411.000.655.535.800.470.00 93.81
Public Works
511.000.657.548.680.470.00 93.81
Public Works
411.000.652.542.900.470.00 93.79
MEADOWDALE CLUBHOUSE5254926008
MEADOWDALE CLUBHOUSE
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 274.42
Fire Station # 165322323139
Fire Station # 16
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 448.81
SEWER LIFT STATION #95672895009
SEWER LIFT STATION #9
411.000.655.535.800.470.00 37.44
35Page:
Packet Page 55 of 393
06/04/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
36
10:22:48AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112166 6/4/2009 (Continued)046900 PUGET SOUND ENERGY
FLEET5903085008
Fleet 7110 210th St SW
511.000.657.548.680.470.00 435.84
PUBLIC SAFETY-FIRE STATION6439566008
PUBLIC SAFETY-FIRE STATION
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 646.14
ANDERSON CENTER6490327001
ANDERSON CENTER
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 2,040.26
LIFT STATION #88851908007
LIFT STATION #8
411.000.655.535.800.470.00 54.94
FIRE STATION #209919661109
FIRE STATION #20
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 341.48
Total :5,645.11
112167 6/4/2009 066948 RAY ALLEN MFG CO INC 244002 INV#244002 - EDMONDS PD
GRIP-IT LINE - 25'
001.000.410.521.260.310.00 53.90
AMBIDEX. HIDDEN SLEEVE/VELCRO
001.000.410.521.260.310.00 109.95
Freight
001.000.410.521.260.310.00 15.00
Total :178.85
112168 6/4/2009 031500 REID MIDDLETON & ASSOC INC 0905071 E6DB.Services thru 05/15/09
E6DB.Services thru 05/15/09
112.200.630.595.330.650.00 4,049.29
Total :4,049.29
112169 6/4/2009 068483 RH2 ENGINEERING INC 49830 E3JC.Services thru 04/26/09
E3JC.Services thru 04/26/09
412.100.630.594.320.410.00 6,332.98
Total :6,332.98
36Page:
Packet Page 56 of 393
06/04/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
37
10:22:48AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112170 6/4/2009 036070 SHANNON TOWING INC 193110 INV#193110 - EDMONDS PD
TOWING-CHRYSLER SEABRING/SVR
001.000.410.521.220.410.00 150.00
Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.220.410.00 14.25
Total :164.25
112171 6/4/2009 036950 SIX ROBBLEES INC 19-024734 Unit 55 - AD9 Cartridge
Unit 55 - AD9 Cartridge
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 25.94
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 2.46
Total :28.40
112172 6/4/2009 036955 SKY NURSERY 279383 FLOWER PROGRAM SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES FOR FLOWER PROGRAM PLANTING
001.000.640.576.810.310.00 67.94
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.810.310.00 6.45
Total :74.39
112173 6/4/2009 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 3850013073 IRRIGATION CONTROL
IRRIGATION CONTROL
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 30.34
UTILITY BILLING3890014081
750 15TH ST SW~
130.000.640.536.500.470.00 213.19
SPRINKLER SYSTEM4160017333
SPRINKLER SYSTEM
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 122.39
UTILITY BILLING5040011628
750 15TH ST SW~
130.000.640.536.500.470.00 121.52
Total :487.44
112174 6/4/2009 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 2260043795 SIGNAL LIGHT
37Page:
Packet Page 57 of 393
06/04/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
38
10:22:48AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112174 6/4/2009 (Continued)037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1
SIGNAL LIGHT
111.000.653.542.640.470.00 47.13
MEADOWDALE CLUBHOUSE2440024129
MEADOWDALE CLUBHOUSE
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 133.56
ANDERSON CULTURAL CENTER2670022181
ANDERSON CULTURAL CENTER
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 2,926.12
SIGNAL LIGHT3710011507
SIGNAL LIGHT
111.000.653.542.640.470.00 49.69
SIGNAL LIGHT3800017489
SIGNAL LIGHT
111.000.653.542.640.470.00 47.28
LIFT STATION #123850011440
LIFT STATION #12
411.000.655.535.800.470.00 263.12
LIFT STATION #154070022027
LIFT STATION #15
411.000.655.535.800.470.00 28.32
LIFT STATION #114130026596
LIFT STATION #11
411.000.655.535.800.470.00 29.56
STREET LIGHT4320012174
STREET LIGHT
111.000.653.542.630.470.00 339.57
LOG CABIN5500019350
LOG CABIN
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 200.03
STREET LIGHTING600001300
STREET LIGHTING
111.000.653.542.630.470.00 21,332.35
Total :25,396.73
112175 6/4/2009 063941 SNO CO SHERIFFS OFFICE I000223291 INV#I000223291 CUST#SSH00010/ EDMONDS PD
38Page:
Packet Page 58 of 393
06/04/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
39
10:22:48AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112175 6/4/2009 (Continued)063941 SNO CO SHERIFFS OFFICE
SCSO RANGE USAGE/40 HOURS
001.000.410.521.400.410.00 2,000.00
Total :2,000.00
112176 6/4/2009 038500 SO COUNTY SENIOR CENTER INC May-09 05/09 RECREATION SERVIES CONTRACT FEE
05/09 Recreation Servies Contract Fee
001.000.390.519.900.410.00 5,000.00
Total :5,000.00
112177 6/4/2009 038300 SOUND DISPOSAL CO 03587/060109 DISPOSAL SERVICES
PARK MAINTENANCE WASTE DISPOSAL SERVICES
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 771.37
Total :771.37
112178 6/4/2009 038300 SOUND DISPOSAL CO 03583 garbage & recycle for PS
garbage & recycle for PS
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 550.74
garbage & recycle for FAC03585
garbage & recycle for FAC
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 674.47
garbage & recycle for Library03586
garbage & recycle for Library
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 555.23
garbage & recycle-City Hall03588
garbage & recycle-City Hall
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 459.89
Total :2,240.33
112179 6/4/2009 069997 SRI TECHNOLOGIES INC 95282 E4GA.Roberts thru 05/16/09
39Page:
Packet Page 59 of 393
06/04/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
40
10:22:48AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112179 6/4/2009 (Continued)069997 SRI TECHNOLOGIES INC
E4GA.Roberts thru 05/16/09
412.300.630.594.320.410.00 422.50
E5MC.Roberts thru 05/16/09
125.000.640.594.750.410.00 910.00
E3JB.Roberts thr u 05/16/09
412.100.630.594.320.410.00 195.00
E9CA.Roberts thru 05/16/09
112.200.630.595.330.410.00 520.00
E4GA.Roberts thru 05/23/0995518
E4GA.Roberts thru 05/23/09
412.300.630.594.320.410.00 325.00
E5MC.Roberts thru 05/23/09
125.000.640.594.750.410.00 520.00
E3JB.Roberts thru 05/23/09
412.100.630.594.320.410.00 747.50
E9CA.Roberts thru 5/23/09
112.200.630.595.330.410.00 195.00
Total :3,835.00
112180 6/4/2009 072301 STEWART, VALERIE STEWART0518 BEACH WALK
DISCOVERY PROGRAM BEACH WALK @ OLYMPIC
001.000.640.574.350.410.00 26.00
Total :26.00
112181 6/4/2009 040430 STONEWAY ELECTRIC SUPPLY 1863227 PW - Elect Supplies
PW - Elect Supplies
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 18.38
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 1.75
40Page:
Packet Page 60 of 393
06/04/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
41
10:22:48AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112181 6/4/2009 (Continued)040430 STONEWAY ELECTRIC SUPPLY
MCH - Elect Supplies1875529
MCH - Elect Supplies
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 205.00
Fac Maint - Elect Supplies
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 65.85
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 25.73
Total :316.71
112182 6/4/2009 072555 SYSTEMS DESIGN ED0509 ALS PROF SERVICES
EMS billing
001.000.510.526.100.410.00 4,746.28
Total :4,746.28
112183 6/4/2009 040917 TACOMA SCREW PRODUCTS INC 10819875 Street supplies
Street supplies
111.000.653.542.310.310.00 260.13
Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.310.310.00 24.71
Total :284.84
112184 6/4/2009 038315 THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR 142647 MUSEUM MAINT
monthly elevator maint-museum~
001.000.651.519.920.480.00 182.93
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.480.00 17.38
MONITORING-PS142648
monitoring-PS 6/1-6/30/09
001.000.651.519.920.480.00 39.68
SENIOR CENTER ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE151543
SENIOR CENTER ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE
001.000.651.519.920.480.00 146.76
001.000.651.519.920.480.00 13.94
41Page:
Packet Page 61 of 393
06/04/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
42
10:22:48AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112184 6/4/2009 (Continued)038315 THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR
SENIOR CENTER ELEVATOR MONITORING151544
SENIOR CENTER ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE
001.000.651.519.920.480.00 11.94
Total :412.63
112185 6/4/2009 069673 TRANSTECH ELECTRIC INC 3622 Pole Repairs at 76th & 212th (minus
Pole Repairs at 76th & 212th (minus
111.000.653.542.640.480.00 20,206.50
Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.640.480.00 1,893.03
Total :22,099.53
112186 6/4/2009 042800 TRI-CITIES SECURITY 15754 Unit eq39wr - Keys
Unit eq39wr - Keys
511.100.657.594.480.640.00 6.50
Sales Tax
511.100.657.594.480.640.00 0.62
Sewer - Padlock15761
Sewer - Padlock
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 24.95
Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 2.37
Sewer - Keys15779
Sewer - Keys
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 6.75
Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 0.64
Total :41.83
112187 6/4/2009 069098 UNDERSTANDING ISRAEL 05302009 WATERSHED FUN FAIR STORYTELLING
WATERSHED FUN FAIR:~
001.000.640.574.350.410.00 300.00
Total :300.00
112188 6/4/2009 068724 US HEALTHWORKS MED GROUP OF WA0267889-WA 5/12/09 INV#0267889-WA 5/12/09 CITY OF EDMONDS
42Page:
Packet Page 62 of 393
06/04/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
43
10:22:48AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112188 6/4/2009 (Continued)068724 US HEALTHWORKS MED GROUP OF WA
BLOOD LEAD/ZPP 5/12/09
001.000.410.521.220.410.00 75.00
Total :75.00
112189 6/4/2009 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST 425-AB8-1176 CITY PARK T1 LINE
5/16-6/16/09 City Park T1 Line
001.000.310.518.880.420.00 411.09
DEDICATED LINE FS #17 TO SNOCOM425-DH0-0667
Dedicated Line FS #17 to Snocom
001.000.310.518.880.420.00 377.24
Frame Relay for Snocom & Internet425-NW2-0887
Frame Relay for Snocom & Internet
001.000.310.518.880.420.00 280.00
Total :1,068.33
112190 6/4/2009 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST 425-778-2153 FS #20 PHONE SERVICE
FS #20 PHONE SERVICE
001.000.510.522.200.420.00 49.67
FS #16 FRAME RELAY425-FLO-0017
FS #16 FRAME RELAY
001.000.510.528.600.420.00 357.44
Total :407.11
112191 6/4/2009 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST 425-206-1108 TELEMETRY LIFT STATIONS
TELEMETRY LIFT STATIONS
411.000.654.534.800.420.00 145.47
TELEMETRY LIFT STATIONS
411.000.655.535.800.420.00 270.16
SEAVIEW RESERVOIR425-206-1137
SEAVIEW RESERVOIR
411.000.654.534.800.420.00 26.50
43Page:
Packet Page 63 of 393
06/04/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
44
10:22:48AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112191 6/4/2009 (Continued)011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST
TELEMETRY LIFT STATION425-206-1141
TELEMETRY LIFT STATION
411.000.654.534.800.420.00 18.53
TELEMETRY LIFT STATION
411.000.655.535.800.420.00 34.41
TELEMETRY LIFT STATION425-206-4810
TELEMETRY LIFT STATION
411.000.654.534.800.420.00 42.32
TELEMETRY LIFT STATION
411.000.655.535.800.420.00 78.58
MEADOWDALE COMMUNITY CLUB-SCAN ALARM425-206-8379
MEADOWDALE COMMUNITY CLUB-SCAN ALARM
001.000.651.519.920.420.00 15.01
LIFT STATION #1425-673-5978
Lift Station #1
411.000.655.535.800.420.00 49.76
PUBLIC SAFETY BLDG ELEVATOR PHONE425-712-8347
PUBLIC SAFETY BLDG ELEVATOR PHONE
001.000.651.519.920.420.00 58.25
FS # 16425-771-0158
FS #16
001.000.651.519.920.420.00 232.99
PUBLIC SAFETY FIRE ALARM425-775-2455
PUBLIC SAFETY FIRE ALARM
001.000.651.519.920.420.00 49.76
FRANCES ANDERSON FIRE ALARM SYSTEM425-776-3896
FRANCES ANDERSON FIRE ALARM SYSTEM
001.000.651.519.920.420.00 117.15
VACANT PW BLDG 200 DAYTON ST425-778-3297
VACANT PW BLDG 200 DAYTON ST
411.000.654.534.800.420.00 18.68
VACANT PW BLDG 200 DAYTON ST
411.000.655.535.800.420.00 34.69
Total :1,192.26
44Page:
Packet Page 64 of 393
06/04/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
45
10:22:48AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112192 6/4/2009 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS 0761749548 C/A 671247844-00001
5/13-6/12/09 Cell Service-Bldg
001.000.620.524.100.420.00 118.64
5/13-6/12/09 Cell Service-Eng
001.000.620.532.200.420.00 257.49
5/13-6/12/09 Cell Service Fac-Maint
001.000.651.519.920.420.00 166.37
5/13-6/12/09 Cell Service-Fire OPS
001.000.510.522.200.420.00 268.85
5/13-6/12/09 Cell Service-Fire Admin
001.000.510.522.100.420.00 35.31
5/13-6/12/09 Cell Service-Parks
001.000.640.574.350.420.00 13.09
5/13-6/12/09 Cell Service Parks Maint
001.000.640.576.800.420.00 48.16
5/13-6/12/09 Cell Service-PD
001.000.410.521.100.420.00 626.88
5/13-6/12/09 Cell Service-Planning
001.000.620.558.600.420.00 26.18
5/13-6/12/09 Cell Service-PW Street
111.000.653.542.900.420.00 40.12
5/13-6/12/09 Cell Service-PW Storm
411.000.652.542.900.420.00 45.12
5/13-6/12/09 Cell Service-PW Water
411.000.654.534.800.420.00 88.59
5/13-6/12/09 Cell Service-PW Sewer
411.000.655.535.800.420.00 20.10
5/13-6/12/09 Cell Service-PW Fleet
511.000.657.548.680.420.00 13.09
5/13-6/12/09 Cell Service-WWTP
411.000.656.538.800.420.00 39.56
Total :1,807.55
112193 6/4/2009 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS 0763539089 Bldg Div Air Card 4/19-5/18/2009
Bldg Div Air Card 4/19-5/18/2009
001.000.620.524.100.420.00 60.01
45Page:
Packet Page 65 of 393
06/04/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
46
10:22:48AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :60.011121936/4/2009 067865 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS
112194 6/4/2009 070186 WA ST FIREFIGHTERS TRAINING &7435 OPS MISC
Stevens smoke class
001.000.510.522.400.490.00 120.00
Total :120.00
112195 6/4/2009 067195 WASHINGTON TREE EXPERTS 06-7452 Main Street Job Site - Remove 22 Alder
Main Street Job Site - Remove 22 Alder
111.000.653.542.710.410.00 1,975.00
Total :1,975.00
112196 6/4/2009 048100 WEINZ, JACK D 44 LEOFF 1 Reimbursement
LEOFF 1 Reimbursement
009.000.390.517.370.230.00 165.41
Total :165.41
112197 6/4/2009 072744 WILLIAMS, PHILLIP L 4-19550 RE: #7-0904-123 UTILITY REFUND
RE: #7-0904-123 Utility Refund
411.000.000.233.000.000.00 40.04
Total :40.04
112198 6/4/2009 064213 WSSUA TREASURER 391 UMPIRING OF LEAGUE GAMES
UMPIRING OF MENS AND CO-ED GAMES
001.000.640.575.520.410.00 2,910.00
Total :2,910.00
Bank total : 1,137,894.95153 Vouchers for bank code :front
1,137,894.95Total vouchers :Vouchers in this report153
46Page:
Packet Page 66 of 393
06/11/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
1
11:16:51AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112199 6/11/2009 065052 AARD PEST CONTROL 268729 RODENT CONTROL
RODENT CONTROL
001.000.640.576.800.480.00 93.08
Total :93.08
112200 6/11/2009 061029 ABSOLUTE GRAPHIX 509259 BASKETBALL & VOLLEYBALL T-SHIRTS
BASKETBALL & VOLLEYBALL~
001.000.640.575.520.310.00 71.82
Sales Tax
001.000.640.575.520.310.00 6.82
Total :78.64
112201 6/11/2009 071177 ADVANTAGE BUILDING SERVICES 09-239 JANITORIAL SERVICE
JANITORIAL SERVICE
411.000.656.538.800.410.23 334.00
Total :334.00
112202 6/11/2009 069157 AIONA, CYNDI AIONA11100 HULA CLASSES
KIDS HULA #11100
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 70.00
ADULT HULA #11104
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 378.00
Total :448.00
112203 6/11/2009 066417 AIRGAS NOR PAC INC 101822032 M5Z34
CAL GAS
411.000.656.538.800.310.22 25.00
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.22 2.38
M5Z34101829511
CYLINDER RENTAL
411.000.656.538.800.450.21 56.20
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.450.21 5.34
Total :88.92
1Page:
Packet Page 67 of 393
06/11/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
2
11:16:51AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112204 6/11/2009 000850 ALDERWOOD WATER DISTRICT 8731 MONTHLY WHOLESALE WATER CHARGES FOR MAY
MONTHLY WHOLESALE WATER CHARGES FOR MAY
411.000.654.534.800.330.00 110,165.21
Total :110,165.21
112205 6/11/2009 001057 ALMY, DON ALMY060909 VOLLEYBALL LEAGUE SUPERVISOR
VOLLEYBALL LEAGUE SUPERVISION @ EDMONDS
001.000.640.575.520.410.00 918.00
Total :918.00
112206 6/11/2009 063862 ALPINE PRODUCTS INC TM-99991 Street - 50 lb Glass Beads
Street - 50 lb Glass Beads
111.000.653.542.640.310.00 3,926.40
Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.640.310.00 373.01
Total :4,299.41
112207 6/11/2009 065413 ALPINE TREE SERVICE 2044 PARK IMPROVEMENT/BALLINGER PARK
TREE TRIMMING/TAKE DOWN & HAUL AWAY @
125.000.640.576.800.480.00 1,050.00
Sales Tax
125.000.640.576.800.480.00 99.70
PARK IMPROVEMENT2045
TREE REMOVAL @ MEADOWDALE CLUBHOUSE
125.000.640.576.800.480.00 290.00
Sales Tax
125.000.640.576.800.480.00 27.56
Total :1,467.26
112208 6/11/2009 069751 ARAMARK 655-4313531 UNIFORM SERVICES
PARK MAINTENANCE UNIFORM SERVICES
001.000.640.576.800.240.00 34.04
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.240.00 3.23
Total :37.27
112209 6/11/2009 069751 ARAMARK 655-4289113 21580001
2Page:
Packet Page 68 of 393
06/11/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
3
11:16:51AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112209 6/11/2009 (Continued)069751 ARAMARK
UNIFORM
411.000.656.538.800.240.00 92.51
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.240.00 8.79
Total :101.30
112210 6/11/2009 069751 ARAMARK 655-4305650 FLEET UNIFORM SVC
FLEET UNIFORM SVC
511.000.657.548.680.240.00 15.00
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.240.00 1.43
FAC MAINT UNIFORM SVC655-4313532
FAC MAINT UNIFORM SVC
001.000.651.519.920.240.00 40.44
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.240.00 3.84
3Page:
Packet Page 69 of 393
06/11/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
4
11:16:51AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112210 6/11/2009 (Continued)069751 ARAMARK
PW MATS655-4318042
PW MATS
001.000.650.519.910.410.00 1.75
PW MATS
111.000.653.542.900.410.00 6.65
PW MATS
411.000.652.542.900.410.00 6.65
PW MATS
411.000.654.534.800.410.00 6.65
PW MATS
411.000.655.535.800.410.00 6.65
PW MATS
511.000.657.548.680.410.00 6.65
Sales Tax
001.000.650.519.910.410.00 0.17
Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.900.410.00 0.63
Sales Tax
411.000.652.542.900.410.00 0.63
Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.410.00 0.63
Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.410.00 0.63
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.410.00 0.64
STREET STORM UNIFORM SVC655-4318043
STREET STORM UNIFORM SVC
111.000.653.542.900.240.00 3.51
STREET STORM UNIFORM SVC
411.000.652.542.900.240.00 3.51
Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.900.240.00 0.34
Sales Tax
411.000.652.542.900.240.00 0.33
4Page:
Packet Page 70 of 393
06/11/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
5
11:16:51AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112210 6/11/2009 (Continued)069751 ARAMARK
FLEET UNIFORM SVC655-4318044
FLEET UNIFORM SVC
511.000.657.548.680.240.00 15.00
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.240.00 1.43
Total :123.16
112211 6/11/2009 064343 AT&T 425-776-5316 PARKS FAX MODEM
PARKS FAX MODEM
001.000.640.576.800.420.00 40.36
Total :40.36
112212 6/11/2009 001795 AUTOGRAPHICS 76264 Unit 495 - City Logo Graphics
Unit 495 - City Logo Graphics
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 138.00
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 13.11
Total :151.11
112213 6/11/2009 002100 BARNARD, EARL 47 LEOFF 1 Reimbursement
LEOFF 1 Reimbursement
617.000.510.522.200.230.00 150.00
Total :150.00
112214 6/11/2009 072748 BARNES, STEVE BLD20090101 Peer Review Fees overpayment.
Peer Review Fees overpayment.
001.000.000.257.620.000.00 659.17
Total :659.17
112215 6/11/2009 066891 BEACON PUBLISHING INC 1734 SUMMER CAMP AD
SUMMER CAMP AD IN~
001.000.640.574.200.440.00 300.00
Total :300.00
112216 6/11/2009 002500 BLUMENTHAL UNIFORM CO INC 741775 INV#741775 EDMONDS PD - SACKVILLE
5Page:
Packet Page 71 of 393
06/11/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
6
11:16:51AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112216 6/11/2009 (Continued)002500 BLUMENTHAL UNIFORM CO INC
T-NECK COTTON SHIRTS
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 39.90
Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 3.79
CREDIT FOR SHIRTS-SACKVILLE741775-80
T-NECK COTTON NAVY SHIRTS
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 -39.90
Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 -3.79
INV#743507-01 EDMONDS PD - FRAUSTO743507-01
511 TACT FBI PANTS
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 79.98
511 RESPONSE JACKET
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 54.99
LETTERS TO GARMENT
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 12.50
Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 14.01
CREDIT FOR 1 PAIR 511 PANTS-FRAUSTO743507-80
511 TACT PANTS - FRAUSTO
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 -39.99
Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 -3.80
Total :117.69
112217 6/11/2009 072005 BROCKMANN, KERRY BROCKMANN10931 YOGA & PILATES CLASSES
6Page:
Packet Page 72 of 393
06/11/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7
11:16:51AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112217 6/11/2009 (Continued)072005 BROCKMANN, KERRY
YOGA #10931
001.000.640.575.540.410.00 300.30
PILATES STRETCH & SCULPT~
001.000.640.575.540.410.00 428.40
YOGA #10911
001.000.640.575.540.410.00 816.20
YOGA #10917
001.000.640.575.540.410.00 704.90
YOGA #10920
001.000.640.575.540.410.00 654.15
Total :2,903.95
112218 6/11/2009 066578 BROWN AND CALDWELL 14102878 E4FE.Services thru 04/23/09
E4FE.Services thru 04/23/09
412.200.630.594.320.410.00 4,747.50
Total :4,747.50
112219 6/11/2009 069295 BROWN, CANDY BROWN10869 BACKYARD BIRDS
BACKYARD BIRDS #10869
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 100.10
Total :100.10
112220 6/11/2009 071510 BUCK, ALICIA BUCK11032 ART FOR KIDZ CLASSES
DOODLE DOTS #11032
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 378.00
MINI MARKERS #11033
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 308.70
Total :686.70
112221 6/11/2009 071816 CARLSON, JESSICA CARLSON10979 ART FOR KIDZ
ART FOR KIDZ: ADVENTURES IN DRAWING
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 378.00
Total :378.00
112222 6/11/2009 072770 CARTER, RAYAN CARTER060509 GYMNASTICS SHOW SET UP
7Page:
Packet Page 73 of 393
06/11/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
8
11:16:51AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112222 6/11/2009 (Continued)072770 CARTER, RAYAN
ASSIST WITH GYMNASTICS SHOW SET UP~
001.000.640.575.550.410.00 40.00
Total :40.00
112223 6/11/2009 068484 CEMEX / RINKER MATERIALS 9417242647 Asphalt
Asphalt
111.000.653.542.310.310.00 251.56
Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.310.310.00 23.90
Asphalt9417249938
Asphalt
111.000.653.542.310.310.00 647.12
Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.310.310.00 61.48
Total :984.06
112224 6/11/2009 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY LY 144763 ELECTRODE HOLDER
ELECTRODE HOLDER
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 43.78
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 4.16
HELIUMLY 144772
HELIUM
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 191.97
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 18.23
GYMNASTICS HELIUMRN05091102
HELIUM FOR GYMNASTICS BIRTHDAY PARTY
001.000.640.575.550.450.00 16.60
Sales Tax
001.000.640.575.550.450.00 1.58
Total :276.32
112225 6/11/2009 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY LY 144972 Water - Carbon Diox fill
8Page:
Packet Page 74 of 393
06/11/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
9
11:16:51AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112225 6/11/2009 (Continued)003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY
Water - Carbon Diox fill
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 21.10
Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 2.01
Total :23.11
112226 6/11/2009 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY RN05091101 ALS SUPPLIES
medical oxygen
001.000.510.526.100.450.00 33.20
Sales Tax
001.000.510.526.100.450.00 3.15
Total :36.35
112227 6/11/2009 064840 CHAPUT, KAREN E CHAPUT11110 FRIDAY NIGHT OUT
FRIDAY NIGHT OUT #11110
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 78.40
Total :78.40
112228 6/11/2009 066382 CINTAS CORPORATION 460440650 UNIFORMS
Stn 17 - ALS
001.000.510.526.100.240.00 127.57
Stn 17 - OPS
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 127.58
Sales Tax
001.000.510.526.100.240.00 12.12
Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 12.12
OPS UNIFORMS460440671
Stn. 20
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 128.53
Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 12.21
9Page:
Packet Page 75 of 393
06/11/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
10
11:16:51AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112228 6/11/2009 (Continued)066382 CINTAS CORPORATION
OPS UNIFORMS460443573
Stn. 16
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 120.71
Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 11.47
UNIFORMS460443574
Volunteers
001.000.510.522.410.240.00 21.16
Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.410.240.00 2.01
Total :575.48
112229 6/11/2009 066070 CIT TECHNOLOGY FIN SERV INC 14487336 COPIER LEASE PW
copier lease for PW
001.000.650.519.910.450.00 573.21
Total :573.21
112230 6/11/2009 019215 CITY OF LYNNWOOD 7030 MONTHLY MAINT/OPERATIONS SEWER COSTS
MONTHLY MAINT/OPERATIONS SEWER COSTS
411.000.655.535.800.470.00 13,800.83
Total :13,800.83
112231 6/11/2009 035160 CITY OF SEATTLE 2-533584-460571 WATER USEAGE FOR THE MONTH OF May 09
WATER USEAGE FOR THE MONTH OF May 09
411.000.654.534.800.330.00 405.00
Total :405.00
112232 6/11/2009 070595 CNOA CNOA 2009 CONFERENCE CNOA 2009 CONFERENCE - KEN CRYSTAL - EPD
CONF REGISTRATION FOR 11/21-24/09
001.000.410.521.400.490.00 490.00
Total :490.00
112233 6/11/2009 004095 COASTWIDE LABORATORIES W2069992 LINERS
10Page:
Packet Page 76 of 393
06/11/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
11
11:16:51AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112233 6/11/2009 (Continued)004095 COASTWIDE LABORATORIES
CAN LINERS
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 97.42
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 9.25
Total :106.67
112234 6/11/2009 071308 COLELLA, TERESA COLELLA06092009 SOFTBALL FIELD ATTENDANT
SOFTBALL ATTENDANT # MEADOWDALE
001.000.640.575.520.410.00 192.00
Total :192.00
112235 6/11/2009 069892 COLUMBIA FORD INC 3-91150 Unit eq54po - New 2009 Ford Crown
Unit eq54po - New 2009 Ford Crown
511.100.657.594.480.640.00 22,474.00
Sales Tax
511.100.657.594.480.640.00 1,842.87
Unit eq56po - New Ford Crown Victoria3-91151
Unit eq56po - New Ford Crown Victoria
511.100.657.594.480.640.00 22,474.00
Sales Tax
511.100.657.594.480.640.00 1,842.87
Total :48,633.74
112236 6/11/2009 069479 COMMUNITY TRADE & ECONOMIC PW122123 LOAN# PW-02-691-019 CTED# 10869
Pr & Int Pmt CTED 10869 2002 Sanitary
411.000.655.582.100.780.00 36,450.00
Pr & Int Pmt CTED 10869 2002 Sanitary
411.000.655.592.100.830.00 2,551.50
Pr & Int Pmt CTED 10869 2002 Sanitary
414.000.656.582.100.780.00 34,875.00
Pr & Int Pmt CTED 10869 2002 Sanitary
414.000.656.592.100.830.00 2,441.25
11Page:
Packet Page 77 of 393
06/11/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
12
11:16:51AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112236 6/11/2009 (Continued)069479 COMMUNITY TRADE & ECONOMIC
LOAN# PW-02-691-PRE-123 CTED# 11830PW122228
Pr Pmt CTED 11830 220th St SW
112.506.630.591.950.780.00 18,143.28
Int Pmt CTED 11830 220th St SW
112.506.630.592.950.830.00 1,270.03
LOAN# PW-04-691-029 CTED# 13873PW122229
Pr Pmt CTED 13873 220th St SW
112.506.630.591.951.780.00 21,176.47
Int Pmt CTED 13873 220th St SW
112.506.630.592.951.830.00 1,694.12
LOAN# PW-04-691-030 CTED# 13818PW122280
Pr Pmt CTED 13818 Stormwater Outfall
411.000.652.582.100.780.00 32,062.50
Int Pmt CTED 13818 Stormwater Outfall
411.000.652.592.100.830.00 2,565.00
LOAN# PW-04-691-031 CTED# 13819PW122322
Pr Pmt CTED 13819 5 Corner Pump Station
411.000.654.582.100.780.00 10,669.74
Int Pmt CTED 13819 5 Corner Pump
411.000.654.592.100.830.00 476.75
LOAN# PW-05-691-015 CTED# 15162PW122367
Pr Pmt CTED 15162 Sewer Lift Station
411.000.655.582.350.780.00 48,600.73
Int Pmt CTED 15162 Sewer Lift Station
411.000.655.592.350.830.00 2,601.48
LOAN# PW-06-962-012 CTED# 17005PW122466
Pr Pmt CTED 17005 100th Ave W
112.200.630.591.950.781.00 32,881.58
Int Pmt CTED 17005 100th Ave W
112.200.630.592.950.831.00 2,959.34
Total :251,418.77
112237 6/11/2009 004579 COMPAAN, ALAN D SPRING WASPC CONF SPRING WASPC CONFERENCE COMPAAN
12Page:
Packet Page 78 of 393
06/11/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
13
11:16:51AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112237 6/11/2009 (Continued)004579 COMPAAN, ALAN D
3 NIGHT HOTEL - KENNEWICK - WASPC
001.000.410.521.400.430.00 269.22
GAS FOR CITY VEHICLE
001.000.410.521.400.430.00 20.00
LUNCH ON 5/18/09 - TO WASPC CONF.
001.000.410.521.400.430.00 9.86
DINNER ON 5/18 - TO WASPC CONF.
001.000.410.521.400.430.00 21.36
Total :320.44
112238 6/11/2009 005965 CUES INC 307291 Unit eq39wr - Prodata 2000 system
Unit eq39wr - Prodata 2000 system
511.100.657.594.480.640.00 2,000.00
Freight
511.100.657.594.480.640.00 24.89
Sales Tax
511.100.657.594.480.640.00 191.80
Total :2,216.69
112239 6/11/2009 072189 DATASITE 62535 Document Shred Services City Clerk
Document Shred Services City Clerk
001.000.250.514.300.410.00 20.00
Doc. Shred Ser. Admin Ser.
001.000.310.514.230.410.00 20.00
Total :40.00
112240 6/11/2009 006626 DEPT OF ECOLOGY WP-158 LAB ACCREDITATION
LAB ACCREDITATION
411.000.656.538.800.510.00 455.00
Total :455.00
112241 6/11/2009 047450 DEPT OF INFORMATION SERVICES 2009050122 CUSTOMER ID# D200-0
Scan Services for May, 2009
001.000.310.518.880.420.00 292.67
Total :292.67
13Page:
Packet Page 79 of 393
06/11/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
14
11:16:51AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112242 6/11/2009 064531 DINES, JEANNIE 09-2995 INV#09-2995 EDMONDS PD
TRANSCRIPTION CASE 09-1013
001.000.410.521.210.410.00 138.00
TRANSCRIPTION CASE IA09-001
001.000.410.521.100.410.00 114.00
TRANSCRIPTION CASE 09-1539
001.000.410.521.210.410.00 57.00
TRANSCRIPTION CASE 09-1749
001.000.410.521.210.410.00 36.00
Total :345.00
112243 6/11/2009 064531 DINES, JEANNIE 09-2994 MINUTE TAKING
5/26 Council Minutes
001.000.250.514.300.410.00 288.00
MINUTE TAKING09-2996
6/2 City Council Minutes
001.000.250.514.300.410.00 261.00
MINUTE TAKING09-2997
TBD Minutes
001.000.250.514.300.410.00 165.00
Total :714.00
112244 6/11/2009 072767 DOYLE, MEGAN DOYLE060809 REFUND
REFUND OF DAMAGE DEPOSIT
001.000.000.239.200.000.00 500.00
Total :500.00
112245 6/11/2009 007175 DRIVELINES NW INC 349071 Unit 476 - Driveshaft, CV Cut, Weld and
Unit 476 - Driveshaft, CV Cut, Weld and
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 263.84
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 24.27
Total :288.11
112246 6/11/2009 070244 DUANE HARTMAN & ASSOCIATES INC 09-1549.1 E9FB.Talbot/Perrinville Survey
14Page:
Packet Page 80 of 393
06/11/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
15
11:16:51AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112246 6/11/2009 (Continued)070244 DUANE HARTMAN & ASSOCIATES INC
E9FB.Talbot/Perrinville Survey
412.200.630.594.320.410.00 6,187.00
Total :6,187.00
112247 6/11/2009 007675 EDMONDS AUTO PARTS 9725 SUPPLIES
FUSES
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 10.81
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 1.03
SUPPLIES9739
FUSES
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 2.93
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 0.28
Total :15.05
112248 6/11/2009 007675 EDMONDS AUTO PARTS 8758 2005
SILICONE
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 12.98
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 1.23
Total :14.21
112249 6/11/2009 007775 EDMONDS CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 12752 May 2009 chamber luncheon - Mayor
May 2009 chamber luncheon - Mayor
001.000.210.513.100.490.00 17.50
Total :17.50
112250 6/11/2009 069523 EDMONDS P&R YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP MARTINEZ0527 YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP
YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP:~
122.000.640.574.100.490.00 221.00
Total :221.00
112251 6/11/2009 069878 EDMONDS-WESTGATE VET HOSPITAL 125590 INV#125590 CLIENT #5118 EDMONDS AC
15Page:
Packet Page 81 of 393
06/11/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
16
11:16:51AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112251 6/11/2009 (Continued)069878 EDMONDS-WESTGATE VET HOSPITAL
NEUTER CAT - IMPOUND #7747
001.000.410.521.700.490.01 44.75
SPAY DOG - IMPOUND#7740
001.000.410.521.700.490.01 48.75
NEUTER DOG - IMPOUND#7754
001.000.410.521.700.490.01 127.50
Total :221.00
112252 6/11/2009 008812 ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINES 045685 Canon 5870 color copies charge 5/7/09 -
Canon 5870 color copies charge 5/7/09 -
001.000.610.519.700.480.00 38.74
Canon 5870 color copies charge 5/7/09 -
001.000.210.513.100.480.00 38.73
Canon 5870 color copies charge 5/7/09 -
001.000.220.516.100.480.00 38.73
Sales Tax
001.000.610.519.700.480.00 3.68
Sales Tax
001.000.210.513.100.480.00 3.68
Sales Tax
001.000.220.516.100.480.00 3.68
Total :127.24
112253 6/11/2009 008975 ENTENMANN ROVIN CO 0052847-IN INV#0052847-IN, ACCT#0011847 EDMONDS PD
ARTWORK FOR THREE BADGES
001.000.410.521.100.410.00 150.00
Total :150.00
112254 6/11/2009 067599 EWING ELECTRIC INC C-251 0001295
C-251 Retainage Release ELECTRICAL
414.000.000.223.400.000.00 3,635.64
Total :3,635.64
112255 6/11/2009 009800 FACTORY DIRECT TIRE SALES 29230 TIRE SUPPLIES
16Page:
Packet Page 82 of 393
06/11/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
17
11:16:51AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112255 6/11/2009 (Continued)009800 FACTORY DIRECT TIRE SALES
TUBE
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 15.00
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 1.43
Total :16.43
112256 6/11/2009 066378 FASTENAL COMPANY WAMOU16792 SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 88.20
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 8.38
Total :96.58
112257 6/11/2009 009815 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC 1483075 17983
SINK VALVE
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 12.16
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 1.16
Total :13.32
112258 6/11/2009 009815 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC 0214294 Water Inventory - ~
Water Inventory - ~
411.000.654.534.800.341.00 597.82
w-pipeco-02-020 (40' Roll)
411.000.654.534.800.341.00 367.13
Water Supplies - 20' Hard Tube Copper
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 183.51
Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.341.00 91.67
Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 17.43
17Page:
Packet Page 83 of 393
06/11/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
18
11:16:51AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112258 6/11/2009 (Continued)009815 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC
Water Inventory -~0214690
Water Inventory -~
411.000.654.534.800.341.00 1,942.60
w-stortz-04-010
411.000.654.534.800.341.00 212.98
Hydrant supplies
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 33.46
Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.341.00 204.78
Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 3.18
Water - 8810 Main St New Hydrant0215431
Water - 8810 Main St New Hydrant
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 2,281.64
Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 216.76
Total :6,152.96
112259 6/11/2009 072768 FIRE TRAINING & TESTING 09-0004 TRAINING MISC
Fire Officer I testing
001.000.510.522.400.490.00 1,425.00
Total :1,425.00
112260 6/11/2009 010665 FOSTER PEPPER PLLC 920297 MATTER# 43
Apr-09 Legal Fees Fiber Optic Project
001.000.310.518.870.410.00 1,300.00
Total :1,300.00
112261 6/11/2009 071945 GILL-ROSE, SUE ROSE10895 DRAWING & WATERCOLOR CLASSES
DRAWING #10895
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 369.60
WATERCOLOR #10896
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 554.40
Total :924.00
18Page:
Packet Page 84 of 393
06/11/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
19
11:16:51AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112262 6/11/2009 068617 GLEISNER, BARBARA GLEISNER11102 TAI CHI CLASSES
TAI CHI #11102
001.000.640.575.540.410.00 172.50
TAI CHI #10962
001.000.640.575.540.410.00 310.50
Total :483.00
112263 6/11/2009 012560 HACH COMPANY 6227430 112830
OPS SUPPORT NETWORK
411.000.656.538.800.410.11 900.00
Total :900.00
112264 6/11/2009 072747 HAMMOND, CHRIS BLD20090101 Peer Review Fees overpaid.
Peer Review Fees overpaid.
001.000.000.257.620.000.00 586.67
Total :586.67
112265 6/11/2009 068142 HARRISON, MARIE Harrison5/09 Reimbursement for expenses for WSAPT
Reimbursement for expenses for WSAPT
001.000.620.524.100.430.00 355.44
Total :355.44
112266 6/11/2009 069565 HI-TECH EVS INC 128800 Unit 476 - Locking Gas Spring, Ball
Unit 476 - Locking Gas Spring, Ball
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 105.50
Freight
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 7.15
Total :112.65
112267 6/11/2009 013500 HINGSON, ROBERT 45 LEOFF 1 Reimbursement
LEOFF 1 Reimbursement
009.000.390.517.370.230.00 34.00
Total :34.00
112268 6/11/2009 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 1030378 4th Of July Parade supplies
19Page:
Packet Page 85 of 393
06/11/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
20
11:16:51AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112268 6/11/2009 (Continued)067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES
4th Of July Parade supplies
111.000.653.542.640.310.00 52.68
Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.640.310.00 5.00
Library - Adhesive, Mosaic1037332
Library - Adhesive, Mosaic
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 8.26
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 0.78
PW - Bolts Cables, Bags, Brackets,1090309
PW - Bolts Cables, Bags, Brackets,
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 6.40
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 0.61
FS 17 - Bug Spray2594601
FS 17 - Bug Spray
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 3.57
Library - Colorant
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 10.97
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 1.38
PW - Window Cleaning Supplies3039573
PW - Window Cleaning Supplies
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 65.48
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 6.22
FAC - Supplies4039218
FAC - Supplies
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 18.65
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 1.77
20Page:
Packet Page 86 of 393
06/11/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
21
11:16:51AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112268 6/11/2009 (Continued)067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES
Fac Maint - Grease Gun4041956
Fac Maint - Grease Gun
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 9.97
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 0.95
Street - Supplies4044842
Street - Supplies
111.000.653.542.610.310.00 79.94
Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.610.310.00 7.59
4th Of July Parade Supplies43849
4th Of July Parade Supplies
111.000.653.542.640.310.00 28.08
Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.640.310.00 2.67
Bracketts Landing - Cement, Connectors,4571623
Bracketts Landing - Cement, Connectors,
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 24.84
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 2.36
FAC Gym Roof - Supplies5032143
FAC Gym Roof - Supplies
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 32.90
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 3.13
Library - Grout Sealer, Title nipper,588121
Library - Grout Sealer, Title nipper,
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 21.90
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 2.08
Library - Grout, Spacers, Supplies6041788
Library - Grout, Spacers, Supplies
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 21.53
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 2.05
21Page:
Packet Page 87 of 393
06/11/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
22
11:16:51AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112268 6/11/2009 (Continued)067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES
Fac Maint - Truck Supplies6591805
Fac Maint - Truck Supplies
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 50.82
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 4.83
4th of July Steps - Supplies7031571
4th of July Steps - Supplies
111.000.653.542.640.310.00 28.15
Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.640.310.00 2.67
Fac Maint Truck Stock - Washers7096818
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 0.67
Fac Maint Truck Stock - Washers
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 7.00
Street - Plyers, Bits, Crimp Tool, Elec7564771
Street - Plyers, Bits, Crimp Tool, Elec
111.000.653.542.640.310.00 81.77
Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.640.310.00 7.77
Fire Boat Shed - Plastic Bags, Door8033891
Fire Boat Shed - Plastic Bags, Door
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 8.43
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 0.80
FAC - Rm126 - Roof Leak Repair Supplies8096570
FAC - Rm126 - Roof Leak Repair Supplies
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 210.16
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 19.97
4th Of July Stairs- Supplies90692
4th Of July Stairs- Supplies
111.000.653.542.640.310.00 4.96
Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.640.310.00 0.47
22Page:
Packet Page 88 of 393
06/11/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
23
11:16:51AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112268 6/11/2009 (Continued)067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES
PW - Svc FeeFCH-003273837
PW - Svc Fee
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 5.00
PW - Svc Fee
111.000.653.542.900.310.00 5.00
PW - Svc Fee
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 5.00
PW - Svc Fee
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 5.00
Total :870.23
112269 6/11/2009 006841 IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS 1017891224 INV#1017891224 - EDMONDS POLICE
DOCUMENTUM RENEWAL MAINT-~
001.000.410.521.110.480.00 4,991.00
Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.110.480.00 474.15
Total :5,465.15
112270 6/11/2009 064655 INNOVAC S 15845 4800
VACUUM TRUCK/SAND FROM INCINERATOR
411.000.656.538.800.410.21 3,104.25
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.410.21 294.90
Total :3,399.15
112271 6/11/2009 015270 JCI JONES CHEMICALS INC 431955 54278825
HYPOCHLORITE SOLUTION
411.000.656.538.800.310.53 3,596.81
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.53 341.70
Total :3,938.51
112272 6/11/2009 063493 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY 13032811-00 Sr Center - Ignition
23Page:
Packet Page 89 of 393
06/11/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
24
11:16:51AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112272 6/11/2009 (Continued)063493 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY
Sr Center - Ignition
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 146.79
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 13.94
Sr Center- Gas part13032854-00
Sr Center- Gas part
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 66.90
Freight
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 47.40
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 10.86
Library - Refridgerant13032995-00
Library - Refridgerant
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 500.00
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 47.50
Total :833.39
112273 6/11/2009 070902 KAREN ULVESTAD PHOTOGRAPHY ULVESTAD11092 DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHY CLASS
DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHY #11092
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 175.50
Total :175.50
112274 6/11/2009 016600 KROESENS INC 93849 ALS UNIFORMS
T.Smith Maltese cross
001.000.510.526.100.240.00 3.95
Sales Tax
001.000.510.526.100.240.00 0.38
Total :4.33
112275 6/11/2009 068024 KRUCKEBERG BOTANIC GARDEN KRUCKENBERG10899 BOTANIC GARDEN TOUR
BOTANIC GARDEN TOUR #10899
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 37.50
Total :37.50
24Page:
Packet Page 90 of 393
06/11/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
25
11:16:51AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112276 6/11/2009 016850 KUKER RANKEN INC 350717-001 INV#350717-001 ACCT#1005003 EDMONDS PD
FLUO.ORANGE PAVEMENT PAINT
001.000.410.521.220.310.00 46.20
FLUO.YELLOW PAVEMENT PAINT
001.000.410.521.220.310.00 46.20
Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.220.310.00 8.78
Total :101.18
112277 6/11/2009 006048 L N CURTIS & SONS 2067583-00 OPS PROTECTIVE CLOTHING
Coat & pants
001.000.510.522.200.250.00 1,992.45
Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.200.250.00 189.28
Total :2,181.73
112278 6/11/2009 067725 LES SCHWAB TIRE CENTER 168078 Unit 91 - Tires and supplies
Unit 91 - Tires and supplies
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 1,355.04
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 130.73
Fleet Tire Inventory (2)168620
Fleet Tire Inventory (2)
511.000.657.548.680.340.30 300.00
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.340.30 30.50
Total :1,816.27
112279 6/11/2009 069634 LEXISNEXIS RISK & INF ANLY GRP 1201641-20090531 INV#1201641-20090531 EDMONDS PD
SEARCHES/REPORTS FOR 05/09
001.000.410.521.210.410.00 67.85
Total :67.85
112280 6/11/2009 018760 LUNDS OFFICE ESSENTIALS 101269 BUSINESS CARD MASTERS
25Page:
Packet Page 91 of 393
06/11/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
26
11:16:51AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112280 6/11/2009 (Continued)018760 LUNDS OFFICE ESSENTIALS
30,000 business cards masters
001.000.000.141.100.000.00 745.00
Sales Tax
001.000.000.141.100.000.00 70.78
BUSINESS CARDS FOR MAYOR, CC & PW101305
Business Cards~250-00223
001.000.210.513.100.490.00 16.87
Sandra Chase250-00223
001.000.250.514.300.310.00 16.87
Bertrand Hauss250-00223
001.000.620.558.800.310.00 16.87
Sales Tax
001.000.210.513.100.490.00 1.60
Sales Tax
001.000.250.514.300.310.00 3.21
Sales Tax
001.000.620.558.800.310.00 1.60
Huda Olsen250-00223
001.000.250.514.300.310.00 16.87
26Page:
Packet Page 92 of 393
06/11/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
27
11:16:51AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112280 6/11/2009 (Continued)018760 LUNDS OFFICE ESSENTIALS
BUSINESS CARDS FOR POLICE DEPT101306
Business cards~250-00225
001.000.410.521.220.310.00 16.00
Gerald Gannon250-00225
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 16.00
Linda Mack (double sided)250-00225
001.000.410.521.710.310.00 41.00
Michael Bard250-00225
001.000.410.521.400.310.00 16.00
William Nelson250-00225
001.000.410.521.220.310.00 16.00
A.J. Frausto250-00225
001.000.410.521.220.310.00 16.00
Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.220.310.00 4.56
Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 1.52
Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.710.310.00 3.90
Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.400.310.00 1.52
Total :1,022.17
112281 6/11/2009 066191 MACLEOD RECKORD 5369 E5MC.Add'l Services-Contractor Error
E5MC.Add'l Services-Contractor Error
125.000.640.594.750.410.00 2,108.75
Total :2,108.75
112282 6/11/2009 071401 MALMSTEN, KATHERINE MALMSTEN10407 CALLIGRAPHY CLASSES
CONTINUING CALLIGRAPHY~
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 877.10
Total :877.10
112283 6/11/2009 019583 MANPOWER INC 18440881 Jan. 5 & 6 reception coverage.
27Page:
Packet Page 93 of 393
06/11/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
28
11:16:51AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112283 6/11/2009 (Continued)019583 MANPOWER INC
Jan. 5 & 6 reception coverage.
001.000.620.558.800.410.00 194.76
Total :194.76
112284 6/11/2009 065829 MARTINSON, LINDA MARTINSON10969 BELLY DANCE TRIM & TONE
BELLY DANCE TRIM & TONE~
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 408.10
BELLY DANCE CLASSESMARTINSON10999
BELLY DANCE #10999
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 184.80
BELLY DANCE #10997
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 92.40
Total :685.30
112285 6/11/2009 072771 MARVIN, SUE MARVIN10699 BASKETRY CLASS
BASKETRY CLASS~
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 196.00
Total :196.00
112286 6/11/2009 019650 MASTER POOLS OF WASHINGTON INC 50795 YOST POOL SUPPLIES
BIOGARD DELUXE
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 69.26
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 6.58
POOL CHEMICALS50917
YOST POOL CHEMICALS
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 121.38
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 11.53
Total :208.75
112287 6/11/2009 019920 MCCANN, MARIAN 46 LEOFF 1 Reimbursement
LEOFF 1 Reimbursement
009.000.390.517.370.230.00 5,575.50
Total :5,575.50
28Page:
Packet Page 94 of 393
06/11/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
29
11:16:51AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112288 6/11/2009 072769 MCINTOSH, KARSTEN MCINTOSH060509 GYMNASTICS SHOW SET UP
ASSISTING WITH GYMNASTICS SHOW SET UP~
001.000.640.575.550.410.00 40.00
Total :40.00
112289 6/11/2009 020039 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO 29070747 123106800
FLANGE/SOCKET/SEALANT
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 749.88
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 19.65
12310680029665509
RESPIRATOR MASK
411.000.656.538.800.310.12 85.90
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.12 6.32
12310680029727055
TUBE FITTING/PIPE NIPPLE
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 91.92
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 6.48
Total :960.15
112290 6/11/2009 071392 MEDIA BAY PRODUCTIONS LLC 060209 MOVIE LICENSES
MOVIE LICENSE FEE FOR~
001.000.640.574.200.490.00 629.63
Total :629.63
112291 6/11/2009 020900 MILLERS EQUIP & RENT ALL INC 87796 17967
PROPANE
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 24.38
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 2.32
Total :26.70
112292 6/11/2009 066553 MISTER T'S TROPHIES 81292 GYMNASTICS TROPHIES
29Page:
Packet Page 95 of 393
06/11/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
30
11:16:51AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112292 6/11/2009 (Continued)066553 MISTER T'S TROPHIES
ENGRAVING OF PLATE
001.000.640.575.550.410.00 110.00
PLAQUES FOR GYMNASTICS
001.000.640.575.550.310.00 106.00
Sales Tax
001.000.640.575.550.410.00 10.45
Sales Tax
001.000.640.575.550.310.00 10.07
Total :236.52
112293 6/11/2009 072492 MOLINA, NILDA MOLINA11005 ZUMBA CLASSES
ZUMBA #11005
001.000.640.575.540.410.00 828.80
Total :828.80
112294 6/11/2009 065315 NEWCOMB, TRACY NEWCOMB11264 FUN FACTORY CLASSES
FUN FACTORY #11264
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 410.40
FUN FACTORY #10957
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 805.13
MINI ME FUN FACTORY~
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 573.75
FUN FACTORY #10958
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 684.00
Total :2,473.28
112295 6/11/2009 023800 NFPA 1169361 ADMIN MISC
Fire Chief Mbrshp fee
001.000.510.522.100.490.00 150.00
Total :150.00
112296 6/11/2009 066391 NORTHSTAR CHEMICAL INC 2139 260
30Page:
Packet Page 96 of 393
06/11/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
31
11:16:51AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112296 6/11/2009 (Continued)066391 NORTHSTAR CHEMICAL INC
SODIUM BISULFITE
411.000.656.538.800.310.54 1,106.00
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.54 105.07
Total :1,211.07
112297 6/11/2009 061013 NORTHWEST CASCADE INC 0952811 HONEY BUCKET RENTAL
HONEY BUCKET RENTAL:~
001.000.640.576.800.450.00 180.29
Total :180.29
112298 6/11/2009 066628 NORTHWEST DISTRIBUTING CO 037422 Fleet Inventory - Ultra-violet wash &
Fleet Inventory - Ultra-violet wash &
511.000.657.548.680.340.40 380.61
Freight
511.000.657.548.680.340.40 3.33
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.340.40 33.87
Total :417.81
112299 6/11/2009 025690 NOYES, KARIN 000 00 639 Engineering Consortium Minutes Lake
Engineering Consortium Minutes Lake
411.000.652.542.900.410.00 96.00
Total :96.00
112300 6/11/2009 025690 NOYES, KARIN 000 00 636 Historic Preservation Commission
Historic Preservation Commission
001.000.620.558.600.410.00 176.00
June 3, 2009 ADB Meeting Minutes.000 00 641
June 3, 2009 ADB Meeting Minutes.
001.000.620.558.600.410.00 256.00
Total :432.00
112301 6/11/2009 063511 OFFICE MAX INC 890477 INV#890477, ACCT#520437 250POL
31Page:
Packet Page 97 of 393
06/11/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
32
11:16:51AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112301 6/11/2009 (Continued)063511 OFFICE MAX INC
DAILY A-Z SORTER
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 8.81
CD-RW REWRITE DISCS 700MB
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 23.04
CANON TONER CART FX-7
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 69.55
Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 9.63
INV#989453, ACCT#520437 250POL989453
WRIST REST PLATFORM/KEYBOARD
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 38.49
FLXGRP RETRACTABLE BK PENS
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 21.92
Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 5.74
INV#989532, ACCT#520437 250POL989532
PICTURE FRAMES 8.5X11-12PK
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 25.00
Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 2.39
Total :204.57
112302 6/11/2009 063511 OFFICE MAX INC 050228 Soap & Paper
Soap & Paper
001.000.310.514.230.310.00 215.78
Sales Tax
001.000.310.514.230.310.00 20.50
Total :236.28
112303 6/11/2009 063511 OFFICE MAX INC 440063 520437
COFFEE FILTERS/COPIER PAPER
411.000.656.538.800.310.41 40.56
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.41 3.86
32Page:
Packet Page 98 of 393
06/11/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
33
11:16:51AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :44.421123036/11/2009 063511 063511 OFFICE MAX INC
112304 6/11/2009 063511 OFFICE MAX INC 063475 OFFICE SUPPLIES
Office Supplies
001.000.250.514.300.310.00 157.91
Sales Tax
001.000.250.514.300.310.00 15.00
Total :172.91
112305 6/11/2009 063511 OFFICE MAX INC 897080 Back ordered clip board for Jaime.
Back ordered clip board for Jaime.
001.000.620.558.800.310.00 11.71
Sales Tax
001.000.620.558.800.310.00 1.12
Total :12.83
112306 6/11/2009 063511 OFFICE MAX INC 043678 OPS SUPPLIES
stations' office supplies
001.000.510.522.200.310.00 80.34
Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.200.310.00 7.63
Total :87.97
112307 6/11/2009 070166 OFFICE OF THE STATE TREASURER May 09 COURT, BLDG CODE & JIS TRANSMITTAL
33Page:
Packet Page 99 of 393
06/11/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
34
11:16:51AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112307 6/11/2009 (Continued)070166 OFFICE OF THE STATE TREASURER
Emergency Medical Services & Trauma
001.000.000.237.120.000.00 1,371.35
PSEA 1 ,2,3 Account
001.000.000.237.130.000.00 29,316.69
Building Code Fee Account
001.000.000.237.150.000.00 85.50
State Patrol Death Investigations
001.000.000.237.170.000.00 621.75
Judicial Information Systems Account
001.000.000.237.180.000.00 4,653.30
School Zone Safety Account
001.000.000.237.200.000.00 199.04
auto theft
001.000.000.237.250.000.00 2,669.38
truamatic brain injury
001.000.000.237.260.000.00 502.41
Total :39,419.42
112308 6/11/2009 026200 OLYMPIC VIEW WATER DISTRICT 0054671 WATER
23700 104TH AVE
001.000.640.576.800.450.00 228.70
WATER0060860
23700 104TH AVE W
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 90.64
Total :319.34
112309 6/11/2009 064975 PAC STAINLESS LTD 281242 182063
STEEL PIPE
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 352.00
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 15.92
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 34.95
Total :402.87
34Page:
Packet Page 100 of 393
06/11/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
35
11:16:51AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112310 6/11/2009 068316 PACE ENGINEERS INC 44592 E8JB.PWTF Application Assistance
E8JB.PWTF Application Assistance
412.100.630.594.320.410.00 825.00
E7JA.PWTF Appolication Assistance
412.100.630.594.320.410.00 1,237.50
PWTF Application Assistance-Sewer
411.000.656.538.800.410.11 3,465.00
Total :5,527.50
112311 6/11/2009 066339 PACIFIC OFFICE AUTOMATION 821678 B/W copy overage fee~
B/W copy overage fee~
411.000.654.534.800.480.00 1.90
B/W copy overage fee~
411.000.655.535.800.480.00 1.90
B/W copy overage fee~
411.000.652.542.900.480.00 1.90
B/W copy overage fee~
111.000.653.542.900.480.00 1.90
Color copy overage fee~
411.000.654.534.800.480.00 7.67
Color copy overage fee~
411.000.655.535.800.480.00 7.67
Color copy overage fee~
411.000.652.542.900.480.00 7.67
Color copy overage fee~
111.000.653.542.900.480.00 7.68
Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.480.00 0.91
Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.480.00 0.91
Sales Tax
411.000.652.542.900.480.00 0.91
Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.900.480.00 0.91
Total :41.93
35Page:
Packet Page 101 of 393
06/11/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
36
11:16:51AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112312 6/11/2009 066817 PANASONIC DIGITAL DOCUMENT COM 011005664 COPIER CONTRACT
COPIER CONTRACT
411.000.656.538.800.450.41 145.22
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.450.41 13.45
Total :158.67
112313 6/11/2009 008475 PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORKS 4/7-5/29/09 FAC MAINT - LIBRARY FIRST AID KIT - J
FAC MAINT - LIBRARY FIRST AID KIT - J
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 16.41
FAC MAINT - CODE UPDATE BOOK - G EVANS
001.000.651.519.920.490.00 36.00
FAC MAINT- LIBRARY BOOK DROP BOX DOOR
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 21.32
FAC MAINT - CITY EMPLOYEE HAND
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 40.83
FAC MAINT - FEB, MAR, APR 09 MILEAGE -
001.000.651.519.920.420.00 33.83
WATER - CDL ENDORSEMENT - J KOBYLK
411.000.654.534.800.490.00 30.00
WATER QUALITY - PARKING FEES FOR
411.000.654.534.800.430.00 7.00
SEWER - WAX FOR TRUCKS - S MATTHEWS
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 15.31
Total :200.70
112314 6/11/2009 072745 PROPERTY FIRST BLD20090052 Refund owner for Nov. fines already
Refund owner for Nov. fines already
001.000.000.257.620.000.00 1,389.45
Total :1,389.45
112315 6/11/2009 071911 PROTZ, MARGARET PROTZ10943 FELDENKRAIS WORKSHOP
FELDENKRAIS WORKSHOP #10943
001.000.640.575.540.410.00 58.80
Total :58.80
36Page:
Packet Page 102 of 393
06/11/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
37
11:16:51AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112316 6/11/2009 046900 PUGET SOUND ENERGY 084-904-700-6 WWTP PUGET SOUND ENERGY
WWTP PUGET SOUND ENERGY
411.000.656.538.800.472.63 56.43
Total :56.43
112317 6/11/2009 046900 PUGET SOUND ENERGY 3689976003 200 Dayton St-Vacant PW Bldg
200 Dayton St-Vacant PW Bldg
411.000.654.534.800.470.00 252.61
Total :252.61
112318 6/11/2009 064291 QWEST 206-Z02-0478 332B TELEMETRY
TELEMETRY
411.000.656.538.800.420.00 138.52
Total :138.52
112319 6/11/2009 071702 RAILROAD MGMT CO III LLC 250662 Meadowdale Storm Water Pipeline Rent
Meadowdale Storm Water Pipeline Rent
411.000.652.542.900.450.00 90.75
Total :90.75
112320 6/11/2009 071467 S MORRIS COMPANY 6/1/09 ACCT#70014, ANIMAL CONTROL-EDMONDS PD
#472024 1 NPC 5/4/09
001.000.410.521.700.410.00 10.68
#671186 2 NPC 5/26/09
001.000.410.521.700.410.00 21.36
Total :32.04
112321 6/11/2009 072521 SAVAGE, JENNIFER SAVAGE11075 CARDIO KICKBOXING CLASSES
CARDIO KICKBOXING #11075
001.000.640.575.540.410.00 595.00
Total :595.00
112322 6/11/2009 066964 SEATTLE AUTOMOTIVE DIST INC 03-992382 Unit 81 - Filters
Unit 81 - Filters
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 39.77
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 3.78
37Page:
Packet Page 103 of 393
06/11/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
38
11:16:51AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112322 6/11/2009 (Continued)066964 SEATTLE AUTOMOTIVE DIST INC
Unit 718 - Motor and Fan03-993030
Unit 718 - Motor and Fan
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 256.98
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 24.41
Total :324.94
112323 6/11/2009 068489 SIRENNET.COM 0096490-IN Unit 11 - 35W Snap In
Unit 11 - 35W Snap In
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 69.00
Unit 11 - Amber Strobe flat lens and0096733-IN
Unit 11 - Amber Strobe flat lens and
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 142.60
Total :211.60
112324 6/11/2009 036955 SKY NURSERY 277259 FLOWER PROGRAM SUPPLIES
PERENNIALS
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 62.73
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 5.96
FLOWER PROGRAM CORNER PARKS278880
ALL PURPOSE FERTILIZER FOR CORNER PARKS
125.000.640.576.800.310.00 209.82
Sales Tax
125.000.640.576.800.310.00 19.93
Total :298.44
112325 6/11/2009 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 2110016462 IRRIGATION CONTROL
IRRIGATION CONTROL
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 30.89
IRRIGATION SYSTEM5070014260
IRRIGATION SYSTEM
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 30.89
Total :61.78
38Page:
Packet Page 104 of 393
06/11/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
39
11:16:51AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112326 6/11/2009 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 290071770 958-001-000-8
WWTP PUD
411.000.656.538.800.471.61 23,277.90
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.471.61 1,396.67
463-001-867-1423012199
9805 EDMONDS WAY/ WESTGATE
411.000.656.538.800.471.62 28.63
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.471.62 1.72
620-001-500-3571020667
VARIOUS LOCATIONS
411.000.656.538.800.471.62 7.23
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.471.62 0.43
Total :24,712.58
112327 6/11/2009 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 6000013000 STREET LIGHTING
STREET LIGHTING
111.000.653.542.630.470.00 15,738.50
Total :15,738.50
112328 6/11/2009 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 3050047152 SIGNAL LIGHT
SIGNAL LIGHT
111.000.653.542.640.470.00 50.70
TRAFFIC SIGNAL4510017488
TRAFFIC SIGNAL
111.000.653.542.640.470.00 30.89
STREET LIGHTING6100013009
STREET LIGHTING
111.000.653.542.630.470.00 7,919.94
STREET LIGHTING6100013306
STREET LIGHTING
111.000.653.542.630.470.00 184.24
39Page:
Packet Page 105 of 393
06/11/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
40
11:16:51AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112328 6/11/2009 (Continued)037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1
STREET LIGHTING6200013008
STREET LIGHTING
111.000.653.542.630.470.00 1,113.37
STREET LIGHTING6200013008
STREET LIGHTING
111.000.653.542.630.470.00 1,192.97
Total :10,492.11
112329 6/11/2009 066072 SNO CO SHERIFF & POLICE CHIEFS 5/2009 ANNUAL DUES- COMPAAN- EDMONDS PD
ANNUAL DUES 1/1/09-12/31/09
001.000.410.521.100.490.00 25.00
Total :25.00
112330 6/11/2009 065910 SNOCOM 911 COMMUNICATIONS 606 Q3-2009 COMMUNICATIONS
Q3-2009 Communications
001.000.390.528.600.510.00 193,529.49
Q3-2009 Communications
411.000.654.534.800.510.00 5,092.88
Q3-2009 Communications
411.000.655.535.800.510.00 5,092.88
Total :203,715.25
112331 6/11/2009 070167 SNOHOMISH COUNTY TREASURER May 09 crime victims
crime victims
001.000.000.237.140.000.00 824.54
Total :824.54
112332 6/11/2009 037800 SNOHOMISH HEALTH DISTRICT 5/31/09 #262408 MAY 12, 2009 PATIENT 262408 EDMONDS PD
ADMIN FEE FOR 5/12/09 RABIES SHOT
001.000.410.521.700.410.00 20.00
RABIES VACCINE ON 5/12/09
001.000.410.521.700.410.00 214.00
OFFICE VISIT ON 5/12/09 - RABIES SHOT
001.000.410.521.700.410.00 35.00
Total :269.00
40Page:
Packet Page 106 of 393
06/11/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
41
11:16:51AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112333 6/11/2009 038300 SOUND DISPOSAL CO 03584 RECYCLING
RECYCLING
411.000.656.538.800.475.66 28.25
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.475.66 1.70
Total :29.95
112334 6/11/2009 069997 SRI TECHNOLOGIES INC 94587 E4GA.Roberts thru 04/18/09
E4GA.Roberts thru 04/18/09
412.300.630.594.320.410.00 812.50
E5MC.Roberts thru 04/18/09
125.000.640.594.750.410.00 1,592.50
Total :2,405.00
112335 6/11/2009 072773 STEINMAN, RONALD W 12.16.08 Council Utility Easement & Storm facilities
Utility Easement & Storm facilities
411.000.652.542.400.490.00 10,635.00
Total :10,635.00
112336 6/11/2009 040430 STONEWAY ELECTRIC SUPPLY 1881091 Unit 476 - Elect Supplies
Unit 476 - Elect Supplies
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 48.19
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 4.58
Sr Center - Electrical Supplies1881092
Sr Center - Electrical Supplies
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 49.28
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 4.68
Total :106.73
112337 6/11/2009 040480 STUSSER ELECTRIC 2338-471014 44-26789
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
411.000.656.538.800.310.22 446.78
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.22 42.44
41Page:
Packet Page 107 of 393
06/11/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
42
11:16:51AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :489.221123376/11/2009 040480 040480 STUSSER ELECTRIC
112338 6/11/2009 068390 SUPERIOR TAPPING INC 8380 Water - 8810 Main St - New Hydrant Tap
Water - 8810 Main St - New Hydrant Tap
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 2,015.00
Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 191.43
Total :2,206.43
112339 6/11/2009 072772 T E BRIGGS CONSTRUCTION CO Prog Pmt 1 E6DB.Complete thru 05/31/09
E6DB.Complete thru 05/31/09
112.200.630.595.330.650.00 52,776.53
Total :52,776.53
112340 6/11/2009 040916 TC SPAN AMERICA 48208 GYMNASTICS T-SHIRTS
T-SHIRTS FOR GYMNASTICS SHOW
001.000.640.575.550.310.00 110.10
Sales Tax
001.000.640.575.550.310.00 10.46
Total :120.56
112341 6/11/2009 009350 THE DAILY HERALD COMPANY 101411 SUMMER CAMP & WATER SPORTS CAMP AD
SUMMER CAMP ADS &~
001.000.640.574.200.440.00 717.00
Total :717.00
112342 6/11/2009 009350 THE DAILY HERALD COMPANY 101415 NEWSPAPER AD
Council & Plan Bd Agendas
001.000.250.514.300.440.00 1,494.11
NEWSPAPER AD1649252
6/2 hearing utility/water tax
001.000.250.514.300.440.00 34.88
NEWSPAPER AD1649253
06/02 Hearing Plastic bags
001.000.250.514.300.440.00 36.52
42Page:
Packet Page 108 of 393
06/11/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
43
11:16:51AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112342 6/11/2009 (Continued)009350 THE DAILY HERALD COMPANY
NEWSPAPER AD1649272
6/2 Hearing 2009 Levy
001.000.250.514.300.440.00 34.06
Total :1,599.57
112343 6/11/2009 009350 THE DAILY HERALD COMPANY 1647835 Lutheran Church/CU-09-22 Legal Notices.
Lutheran Church/CU-09-22 Legal Notices.
001.000.620.558.600.440.00 24.60
Yunhap/CU-09-2 Legal Notices.1649825
Yunhap/CU-09-2 Legal Notices.
001.000.620.558.600.440.00 36.52
Total :61.12
112344 6/11/2009 071119 THERMO ENVIRONMENTAL INST INC 197784 5257600
REPAIR CEM
411.000.656.538.800.480.21 705.00
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.480.21 167.83
5257600197788
REPAIR CEM
411.000.656.538.800.480.21 1,981.00
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.480.21 272.09
Total :3,125.92
112345 6/11/2009 071590 TOWEILL RICE TAYLOR LLC May2009-Edmonds May 2009 Hearing Examiner Services.
May 2009 Hearing Examiner Services.
001.000.620.558.600.410.00 3,500.00
Total :3,500.00
112346 6/11/2009 041960 TOWN & COUNTRY FENCE INC 39759 FENCE REPAIR
CEDAR SPLIT RAIL FENCING REPAIR
001.000.640.576.800.480.00 130.00
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.480.00 12.35
43Page:
Packet Page 109 of 393
06/11/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
44
11:16:51AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112346 6/11/2009 (Continued)041960 TOWN & COUNTRY FENCE INC
SUPPLIES39842
BANDS, CAPS, ETC.
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 211.26
Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 20.07
Total :373.68
112347 6/11/2009 068322 TRANE 2789326R1 Library - Motor and Capacitor
Library - Motor and Capacitor
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 238.50
Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 22.66
Total :261.16
112348 6/11/2009 068249 TRAUTMANN MAHER & ASSOCIATES 0509-284b 1st Qtr. 2009 - MEBT 2 accounts
1st Qtr. 2009 - MEBT 2 accounts
001.000.220.516.100.410.00 42.00
MEBT 2 services for May, 20095/29/09
MEBT 2 services for May, 2009
001.000.220.516.100.410.00 84.57
Total :126.57
112349 6/11/2009 068407 TROUT UNLIMITED LAEBUGTEN10874 BEGINNING FISHING CLASS
BEGINNING FISHING FOR YOUNGSTERS~
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 294.00
Total :294.00
112350 6/11/2009 070182 UNDERWRITERS LABORATORIES INC 710150290889 OPS REPAIRS & MAINT
ladders inspection
001.000.510.522.200.480.00 817.50
Total :817.50
112351 6/11/2009 061192 UNITED PIPE & SUPPLY 8186295 Water Supplies - Pres Reg Valve
44Page:
Packet Page 110 of 393
06/11/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
45
11:16:51AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112351 6/11/2009 (Continued)061192 UNITED PIPE & SUPPLY
Water Supplies - Pres Reg Valve
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 110.36
Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 10.26
Water - Seaiew Reservoir Repair - 4" EZ8192821
Water - Seaiew Reservoir Repair - 4" EZ
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 520.60
Water- Touch Reader Repair8216004
Water- Touch Reader Repair
411.000.654.534.800.480.00 174.00
Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.480.00 16.53
Total :831.75
112352 6/11/2009 044300 US POSTAL SERVICE PERMIT 1036 POSTAGE FOR PERMIT 1036 - 2009 WQR
POSTAGE FOR PERMIT 1036 - 2009 WQR
411.000.654.534.800.420.00 2,500.00
Total :2,500.00
112353 6/11/2009 069592 USA MOBILITY WIRELESS S0298897E INV#S0298897E EDMONDS PD
PAGERS 05/27/09 - 06/26/09
001.000.410.521.100.420.00 167.06
Total :167.06
112354 6/11/2009 044960 UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOC CTR 9050108 May 2009 utility locates
May 2009 utility locates
411.000.654.534.800.410.00 81.99
May 2009 utility locates
411.000.655.535.800.410.00 81.99
May 2009 utility locates
411.000.652.542.900.410.00 82.02
Total :246.00
112355 6/11/2009 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST 425-712-0647 IRRIGATION SYSTEM
45Page:
Packet Page 111 of 393
06/11/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
46
11:16:51AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112355 6/11/2009 (Continued)011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST
IRRIGATION SYSTEM
001.000.640.576.800.420.00 44.56
SEAVIEW PARK IRRIGATION MODEM425-744-1681
SEAVIEW PARK IRRIGATION MODEM
001.000.640.576.800.420.00 44.56
SIERRA PARK IRRIGATION MODEM425-744-1691
SIERRA PARK IRRIGATION MODEM
001.000.640.576.800.420.00 43.90
MEADOWDALE PRESCHOOL425-745-5055
MEADOWDALE PRESCHOOL
001.000.640.575.560.420.00 58.03
GROUNDS MAINTENANCE FAX MODEM425-776-5316
GROUNDS MAINTENANCE FAX MODEM
001.000.640.576.800.420.00 109.24
Total :300.29
112356 6/11/2009 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST 425 NW1-0060 03 0210 1079569413 10
BPS TELEMETRY
411.000.656.538.800.420.00 41.48
03 0210 1099569419 02425 NW1-0155
TELEMETRY
411.000.656.538.800.420.00 218.12
03 0210 1014522641 07425-771-5553
AUTO DIALER
411.000.656.538.800.420.00 75.60
Total :335.20
112357 6/11/2009 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST 425-640-8169 PT EDWARDS SEWER PUMP STATION MONITOR
Phone line for Sewer Lift Station at Pt
411.000.655.535.800.420.00 36.07
LIBRARY ELEVATOR PHONE425-776-1281
LIBRARY ELEVATOR PHONE
001.000.651.519.920.420.00 44.56
46Page:
Packet Page 112 of 393
06/11/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
47
11:16:51AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112357 6/11/2009 (Continued)011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST
CITY HALL FIRE ALARM SYSTEM425-776-6829
CITY HALL FIRE ALARM SYSTEM
001.000.651.519.920.420.00 117.15
1ST & PINE CIRCUIT LINE PT EDWARDS425-AB9-0530
1st & Pine Circuit Line for Pt Edwards
411.000.655.535.800.420.00 40.75
Total :238.53
112358 6/11/2009 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST 425-771-0152 FS #16-FAX LINE
FS #16-FAX LINE
001.000.510.522.200.420.00 53.17
Total :53.17
112359 6/11/2009 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS 0765375607 INV#0765375607 ACCT#470497482-00001
CELL PHONES - NARCS
104.000.410.521.210.420.00 121.84
Total :121.84
112360 6/11/2009 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS 0765282946 ACCT 571242650-00001
47Page:
Packet Page 113 of 393
06/11/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
48
11:16:51AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112360 6/11/2009 (Continued)067865 VERIZON WIRELESS
CR 425-238-1007 5/8/09
001.000.210.513.100.420.00 -191.81
C/A 571242650-00010765282946
04/23-5/22/09 Blackberry Cell Phone
001.000.210.513.100.420.00 117.24
04/23-5/22/09 Blackberry Cell Phone
001.000.220.516.100.420.00 56.35
04/23-5/22/09 Blackberry Cell Phone
001.000.250.514.300.420.00 56.35
04/23-5/22/09 Blackberry Cell Phone
001.000.310.514.230.420.00 56.35
04/23-5/22/09 Blackberry Cell Phone
001.000.310.518.880.420.00 349.58
04/23-5/22/09 Blackberry Cell Service
001.000.610.519.700.420.00 56.35
04/23-5/22/09 Blackberry Cell Phone
001.000.620.558.800.420.00 56.35
04/23-5/22/09 Blackberry Cell Phone
001.000.620.524.100.420.00 56.35
04/23-5/22/09 Blackberry Cell Phone
001.000.620.558.600.420.00 56.35
04/23-5/22/09 Blackberry Cell Phone
001.000.410.521.220.420.00 1,145.43
04/23-5/22/09 Blackberry Air Cards
001.000.410.521.220.420.00 251.10
04/23-5/22/09 Blackberry Cell Phone
001.000.510.522.100.420.00 56.35
04/23-5/22/09 Blackberry Cell Phone
001.000.510.522.200.420.00 284.39
04/23-5/22/09 Blackberry Cell Phone
001.000.510.522.300.420.00 56.35
04/23-5/22/09 FD Air Cards
001.000.510.522.200.420.00 110.04
04/23-5/22/09 Blackberry Cell Phone
48Page:
Packet Page 114 of 393
06/11/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
49
11:16:51AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112360 6/11/2009 (Continued)067865 VERIZON WIRELESS
001.000.640.574.100.420.00 57.22
04/23-5/22/09 Blackberry Cell Phone
001.000.650.519.910.420.00 56.35
04/23-5/22/09 Blackberry Cell Phone
411.000.652.542.900.420.00 61.67
04/23-5/22/09 Blackberry Cell Phone
001.000.651.519.920.420.00 144.92
04/23-5/22/09 Blackberry Cell Phone
511.000.657.548.680.420.00 58.99
04/23-5/22/09 Blackberry Cell Phone
411.000.654.534.800.420.00 28.19
04/23-5/22/09 Blackberry Cell Phone
411.000.655.535.800.420.00 28.19
04/23-5/22/09 Blackberry Cell Phone
001.000.620.532.200.420.00 144.56
04/23-5/22/09 Blackberry Cell Phone
411.000.656.538.800.420.00 116.21
04/23-5/22/09 Blackberry Cell Phone
001.000.230.512.500.420.00 115.05
Total :3,384.47
112361 6/11/2009 069816 VWR INTERNATIONAL INC 38297156 1066294
LAB SUPPLIES
411.000.656.538.800.310.31 569.20
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.31 40.26
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.31 57.90
Total :667.36
112362 6/11/2009 062320 WA ST ARTS ALLIANCE FDN EAC2010 2009 - 2010 MEMBERSHIP
EDMONDS ART COMMISSION~
117.100.640.573.100.490.00 100.00
Total :100.00
49Page:
Packet Page 115 of 393
06/11/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
50
11:16:51AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112363 6/11/2009 068259 WA ST CRIMINAL JUSTICE 2009-1816 INV# 2009-1816 EDMONDS PD - BLACKBURN
PROPERTY&EVIDENCE CLASS 0613-2
001.000.410.521.400.490.00 75.00
Total :75.00
112364 6/11/2009 065035 WASHINGTON STATE PATROL I09009096 INV#I09009096 EDM301
BACKGROUND CHECKS 05/09
001.000.000.237.100.000.00 250.25
Total :250.25
112365 6/11/2009 061395 WASTE MANAGEMENT NW 5605974-2677-7 201-0170717-2677-7
ASH DISPOSAL
411.000.656.538.800.474.65 3,336.47
Total :3,336.47
112366 6/11/2009 072000 WCI 091511459 C/A 00100362301
Fiber Optic Internet Connection June-09
001.000.310.518.870.420.00 2,800.00
Total :2,800.00
112367 6/11/2009 049500 WEST PUBLISHING 818377988 CODE UPDATES
RCW updates
001.000.250.514.300.310.00 156.03
Total :156.03
112368 6/11/2009 069691 WESTERN SYSTEMS I0003673 Ped Signal Audible (Green)
Ped Signal Audible (Green)
111.000.653.542.640.310.00 343.75
Freight
111.000.653.542.640.310.00 7.54
Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.640.310.00 33.38
Total :384.67
112369 6/11/2009 072634 WHISTLE WORKWEAR E-62809 UNIFORM/SLENKER JACKET
50Page:
Packet Page 116 of 393
06/11/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
51
11:16:51AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112369 6/11/2009 (Continued)072634 WHISTLE WORKWEAR
UNIFORM/SLENKER JACKET
411.000.656.538.800.240.00 53.99
Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.240.00 4.97
Total :58.96
112370 6/11/2009 051282 ZUMAR INDUSTRIES INC 0132630 CEMETERY SIGN BLANKS
CEMETERY SIGN BLANKS
130.000.640.536.500.310.00 180.95
Freight
130.000.640.536.500.310.00 72.42
Sales Tax
130.000.640.536.500.310.00 24.07
Total :277.44
Bank total :913,671.92172 Vouchers for bank code :front
913,671.92Total vouchers :Vouchers in this report172
51Page:
Packet Page 117 of 393
AM-2316 2.D.
Claim for Damages
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:06/16/2009
Submitted By:Linda Hynd, City Clerk's Office
Submitted For:Sandy Chase Time:Consent
Department:City Clerk's Office Type:Action
Review Committee:
Committee Action:
Information
Subject Title
Acknowledge receipt of Claim for Damages from Ken Behling ($510.99).
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
It is recommended that the City Council acknowledge receipt of the Claim for Damages by minute
entry.
Previous Council Action
N/A
Narrative
A Claim for Damages was submitted by the following individual:
Ken Behling
6017 188th SW
Lynnwood, WA 98037
($510.99)
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: Behling Claim for Damages
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 06/10/2009 02:57 PM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 06/10/2009 02:58 PM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 06/10/2009 03:02 PM APRV
Form Started By: Linda
Hynd
Started On: 06/03/2009 08:25
AM
Final Approval Date: 06/10/2009
Packet Page 118 of 393
Packet Page 119 of 393
Packet Page 120 of 393
Packet Page 121 of 393
Packet Page 122 of 393
AM-2342 2.E.
Reappointments to the Public Facilities District Board
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:06/16/2009
Submitted By:Cindi Cruz, Community Services
Submitted For:Edmonds Public Facilities District Time:Consent
Department:Community Services Type:Action
Review Committee:
Committee Action:
Information
Subject Title
Reappointment of John McGibbon and Terry Vehrs to the Public Facilities District Board.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Previous Council Action
Narrative
On June 19, 2001, the Edmonds City Council approved the appointment of a five-member Public
Facilities District (PFD) board. Although Ordinance No. 3358 states that all board members are to
serve four-year terms, initial term lengths were established for one, two, three and four-year terms
to create a staggered schedule. John McGibbon and Terry Vehrs were selected to serve for four
years, Kay Mahaffey for three years, James Monroe for two years, and Jan Conner for one year.
On June 19, 2009, John McGibbon's and Terry Vehrs' terms will expire. Mr. McGibbon and Mr.
Vehrs have served effectively and are both interested in continuing to serve on the PFD Board.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
No file(s) attached.
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 06/11/2009 02:07 PM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 06/11/2009 02:12 PM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 06/11/2009 02:25 PM APRV
Form Started By: Cindi
Cruz
Started On: 06/11/2009 11:47
AM
Final Approval Date: 06/11/2009
Packet Page 123 of 393
AM-2326 2.F.
Interlocal Agreement for Verizon Frontier Transfer
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:06/16/2009
Submitted By:Stephen Clifton, Community Services Time:Consent
Department:Community Services Type:Action
Review Committee:
Committee Action:
Information
Subject Title
Interlocal Agreement - Consortium for Negotiation of Transfer of Cable Franchise Agreement
from Verizon Northwest, Inc. to Frontier Communications Corporation.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Authorize Mayor Haakenson to sign on behalf of the City the attached Interlocal Agreement
- Consortium for Negotiation of Transfer of Cable Franchise Agreement from Verizon Northwest,
Inc. to Frontier Communications Corporation.
Authorize Mayor Haakenson to sign on behalf of the City, the attached Conflict of Interest Waiver.
Previous Council Action
February 26, 2008 - City Council directed the City Attorney to continue with a schedule which
outlined possible "Next Steps" regarding negotiations with Verizon.
March 25, 2008 - City Council authorized Mayor Haakenson to sign an Interlocal Agreement
Consortium For Negotiation of Cable Television Franchising, in addition to preparing and
executing a Consultant Agreement with River Oaks.
July 22, 2008 - City Council conducted a first reading and public hearing related to the proposed
Cable Franchise Agreement between the City of Edmonds and Verizon Northwest Inc.
July 29, 2008 - City Council approved Ordinance 3693 adopting a Cable Franchise Agreement
between the City of Edmonds and Verizon Northwest Inc. The City Council also authorized
Mayor to execute the Franchise Agreement on behalf of the City.
Narrative
On May 13, 2009, Verizon announced plans to divest its local wireline communications system to
Frontier Communications. According to a May 19, 2009 letter to the City of Edmonds from both
entities, the transaction includes Verizon’s residential and small business telephone lines, internet
service, long-distance voice accounts, as well as Verizon’s fiber-to-the-premises (FTTP) assets;
Frontier will continue to provide video services after the completion of the merger.
City staff and a representative from the City Attorney’s firm met with representatives of each
entity on June 11, 2009. This allowed us an opportunity to ask questions and to prepare for the
Packet Page 124 of 393
potential transfer. Staff from entities participating in the North Puget Sound Consortium are also
conducting similar meetings with Verizon and Frontier representatives.
As required by the Federal Communications Commission, a Form 394 must be used when
applying for franchise authority approval to assign or transfer control of a cable television system.
The franchise authority in this case is the City of Edmonds. According to Section 617(e) of the
Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, the franchise authority shall
have 120 days from the date of filing Form 394 (complete with all exhibits and any information
required by the franchise agreement or applicable state or local law) to act upon such request. If
the franchise authority fails to render a final decision on such request within 120 days, the request
shall be deemed granted unless the requesting party and the franchise authority agree to an
extension of time.
In addition to the information requested on this form, cable operators are required to submit all
information required by the cable franchise agreement or applicable local law or that the
franchising authority deems necessary or appropriate in connection with the transfer
determination. A franchise authority has only 30 days in which to review Form 394 to determine
whether all necessary information has been provided and is complete. The City is familiar with the
process as a result of processing this type of application in 2002 with the transfer of the AT&T
Franchise to AT&T Comcast Corporation. The process can consume a great deal of staff time and
requires expertise to determine the legal, financial and technical qualifications related to the
transfer. Expenses related to reviewing and processing this type of application is an unexpected or
unanticipated expenditure for franchise authorities.
In order to reduce the amount of time and money spent by franchise authorities, certain members
of the North Puget Sound Consortium, and other entities, propose entering into the attached draft
Interlocal Agreement per the provisions of the Interlocal Cooperation Act of 1967, RCW Chapter
39.34. While each governmental entity may negotiate on its own behalf, the Parties to the
proposed Interlocal Agreement wish to coordinate their efforts in order: a) to ensure that the public
receives the maximum rights and benefits from their respective franchise agreements; b) to better
coordinate the transfer process with Verizon and Frontier; (c) to share the costs of the evaluation
of the transfer application and any potential negotiations, including hiring a national consultant
and attorneys, and if necessary an accountant and technical advisor, to assure the citizens of each
jurisdiction that the transfer is consistent with the terms of the Parties’ respective franchises; and
(d) to create a common transfer resolution template.
Similar to the process used to negotiate the Verizon and Comcast Interlocal Agreements,
participating entities to the proposed Interlocal Agreement will jointly contract with River Oaks
Communications and Ogden Murphy Wallace for common services as well as a mechanism for
each entity to utilize the consultant’s services, as that entity sees fit, and for additional support in
reviewing or negotiating the transfer to meet specific needs of each participating entity.
If approved by the City Council, per Exhibit B of the Interlocal Agreement, the share of overall
expenses ($39,500) for the City of Edmonds is estimated at $3,545.12. City Administration
proposes using non – departmental funds to pay for these services.
Also attached is a Conflict of Interest Waiver. The waiver, if approved, will allow Ogden Murphy
Wallace to jointly represent the Cities of Edmonds, Woodinville, Carnation, and Town of
Packet Page 125 of 393
Woodway during this process. This is similar to a joint representation letter approved by the City
Council on October 7, 2008 to allow Ogden Murphy Wallace to jointly represent these cities
during Comcast Franchise negotiations.
Fiscal Impact
Fiscal Year:
Revenue:
Expenditure:$3,545.12
Fiscal Impact:
City Administration proposes using non – departmental funds to pay for these services.
Attachments
Link: Attachment 1 - Interlocal Agreement
Link: Attachment 2 - Conflict of Interest Waiver
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 06/11/2009 02:25 PM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 06/11/2009 02:26 PM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 06/11/2009 02:37 PM APRV
Form Started By: Stephen
Clifton
Started On: 06/08/2009 02:27
PM
Final Approval Date: 06/11/2009
Packet Page 126 of 393
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT
CONSORTIUM FOR NEGOTIATION OF TRANSFER OF CABLE FRANCHISE
AGREEMENT FROM VERIZON NORTHWEST, INC. TO
FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
This Interlocal Agreement (the “Agreement”) is made and entered into by and between
the undersigned Parties pursuant to the provisions of the Interlocal Cooperation Act of 1967,
RCW Chapter 39.34.
WHEREAS, Snohomish County and some cities of South Snohomish and King County
(collectively the “Parties”) are or will soon be in the process of negotiating the transfer of control
of the cable franchise with Verizon Northwest, Inc. (“Verizon”) to Frontier Communications
Corporation (“Frontier”); and
WHEREAS, while each governmental entity may negotiate on its own behalf, the Parties
to this agreement wish to coordinate their efforts in a lawful manner in order: a) to ensure that
the public receives the maximum rights and benefits from their respective franchise agreements;
b) to better coordinate the transfer process with Verizon and Frontier; (c) to share the costs of the
evaluation of the transfer application and any potential negotiations, including hiring a national
consultant and attorneys, and if necessary an accountant and technical advisor, to assure the
citizens of each jurisdiction that the transfer is consistent with the terms of the Parties’ respective
franchises; and (d) to create a common transfer resolution template; and
WHEREAS, the Interlocal Cooperation Act provides a mechanism to both jointly
contract with consultants, including accountants and technical advisors, for common services as
well as a mechanism for each Party to utilize the consultant’s services, as that Party sees fit, for
additional support in negotiation as well as the tailoring of the template to the specific needs of
each participating entity;
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants contained
herein, it is agreed that:
1. Purpose. This Agreement shall have the following purposes:
1.1 Create a Consortium, entitled the “Verizon/Frontier Transfer Consortium”
(“Consortium”), to assist the Parties in joint and individual negotiations with Verizon and
Frontier for the transfer of the cable franchise.
1.2 Provide a vehicle for the Parties to designate a representative to organize
the Consortium and lead negotiations. Peter Camp of the Snohomish County executive office is
hereby designated as the lead negotiator.
1.3 Provide a vehicle for the Parties to contract with River Oaks
Communications Corporation (“Consultant”), for the evaluation of the Request for Consent to
{ERZ730276.DOC;1/00006.080054/}
June 12, 2009
Page 1 of 16
Packet Page 127 of 393
Transfer of Control of Franchise, the FCC Form 394 and attached exhibits, and other related
transfer documents (hereinafter “Transfer Documents”).
1.4 Engage Consultant to perform certain services as described in the Scope of
Work (“Consultant Services”), attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this
reference.
1.5 Engage the law firm of Ogden Murphy Wallace, P.L.L.C. (“OMW”) to
provide administrative and negotiation services for the Consortium.
1.6 If desired by the Parties, enable the Parties to contract with an accountant
or technical advisor as provided in Sections 6 and 7.
1.7 This Agreement shall also serve as a vehicle to contract with the
Consultant for additional individualized services to be provided as needed to each individual
Party. By so doing, the Parties hope to secure a lower cost for the Consultant’s services through
a joint contracting framework as well as minimize associated travel costs and other expenses by
coordinating their efforts.
1.8 The Consortium shall also serve as a vehicle for the Parties to share
information now and in the future regarding telecommunications and cable issues, including but
not limited to issues such as educational and governmental channel usage, access fees and capital
fees, negotiation strategies for franchises, the negotiation of cell tower and other
telecommunication leases, right–of–way use requirements, and other similar issues. This
information sharing is intended to provide a vehicle for sharing information regarding issues of
common public interest.
2. Duration.
2.1 The Effective Date of this Agreement is the date on which the fourth Party
signs the Agreement or the date this Agreement is posted on the City of Edmonds website,
whichever later occurs.
2.2 The Consortium, as an information–sharing group, may remain in effect
for an indefinite term for the mutual benefit and cooperation of the Parties for so long as they
individually choose to participate.
2.3 The Consortium, as a body formed to evaluate the transfer documents and
as a joint negotiation team, may remain in effect for two (2) years and will terminate at the
anniversary of the Effective Date unless otherwise extended by the action of the Parties.
2.4 Any Party may withdraw from this agreement upon the provision of ten
(10) days written notice subject to the limitations of Section 3.4.
3. Organization. The Consortium may consist of Snohomish County and the cities
of Bothell, Edmonds, Everett, Kenmore, Marysville, Mukilteo, Mountlake Terrace, Redmond,
{ERZ730276.DOC;1/00006.080054/}
June 12, 2009
Page 2 of 16
Packet Page 128 of 393
Shoreline, Woodinville and the Town of Woodway, upon their authorization. The City of
Edmonds shall serve as the contracting entity with the Consultant. In addition, other entities
authorized to participate in interlocal agreements by statute may join during the term of this
Agreement, pursuant to Section 3.3 or may contract with the Consortium pursuant to Section
Error! Reference source not found..
3.1 In accordance with RCW 39.34.030, financing of the Consortium and all
costs associated with consulting, evaluating, negotiating and attorney services provided to the
Consortium shall include an initial amount equal to $2,000 per Party plus an amount based on a
Party’s population. All costs incurred by the Consortium shall be shared by the Parties on a pro-
rata basis based upon the population of the Party.
3.1.1 The population of all Parties is based on the April 2008
Washington State Office of Financial Management Annual Population Estimate and is described
in Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Snohomish County’s
population is based on the population residing in the proposed build-out area pursuant to the
Verizon Franchise, using the April 2006 Washington State Office of Financial Management
Annual Population Estimate.
3.1.2 Pro-rata share estimates and associated predicted costs as described
in Exhibit B are for illustrative purposes only. The pro–rata share apportioned to each Party is
dependent on the number of jurisdictions who agree to join the Consortium.
3.2 The Parties shall attempt to reach a consensus regarding the direction of
the Consultant, the administrator, negotiators, accountant, technical advisors, and any other
persons working on behalf of the Consortium in the evaluation of the Transfer Documents. In
the event that the Parties cannot reach substantial agreement, voting shall be on a weighted basis,
with each Party having as many votes as its pro–rata percentage of the costs to be shared. A
quorum shall consist of at least Snohomish County and a majority of the member cities.
3.3 Additional cities may join the Consortium upon satisfaction of the
following requirements:
3.3.1 Approval of entry of the city applying (“Applicant City”) by
consensus of the current Parties to the Consortium;
3.3.2 Request to join the Consortium is received no later than
July 31, 2009;
3.3.3 The Applicant City agrees to the terms of this Agreement;
3.3.4 The Applicant City may join by paying a fee equal to the amount
of its pro–rata share of the total cost incurred and billed through its date of entry. The pro–rata
share of the Applicant City shall be determined in accordance with Section 3.1; and
{ERZ730276.DOC;1/00006.080054/}
June 12, 2009
Page 3 of 16
Packet Page 129 of 393
3.3.5 Following admittance into the Consortium, the Applicant City will
pay its pro–rata share of costs incurred and billed after its date of entry consistent with all other
Parties to this Agreement pursuant to Section 3.1.
3.4 A withdrawing Party shall be liable for its pro–rata share of Consortium
costs incurred through the date of its departure. Each Party shall be individually liable for all
costs associated with individual work requested from the Consultant. Each Party agrees to
indemnify and hold the other Parties harmless for the costs which that Party individually incurs.
3.5 All costs of the Consortium incurred under Section 1 shall be billed
directly to the individual Consortium members by the Consultant, OMW and any Party or entity
providing Accounting Services pursuant to Section 6 or Technical Services pursuant to Section
7. The Parties agree to promptly pay all invoices within forty–five (45) days of the mailing of an
invoice for the Parties’ share of undisputed joint costs. Late payments (more than forty–five (45)
days after mailing) shall bear interest at twelve percent (12%) per annum with a minimum late
payment fee of fifty dollars ($50.00), provided, however, that if a cost is adjusted through the
dispute resolution procedure outlined in Section 11, no late fee shall attach.
3.6 In the event that any portion of the Consortium’s costs are reimbursed by
Verizon or Frontier as a part of the resolution of the transfer process, such reimbursement shall
first be applied to any unpaid costs of the Consortium. Any excess monies shall be returned to
the Consortium members, pro–rata, in the same percentages established by Section 3.1. This
Section 3.6 shall be applied and interpreted to ensure that any recovery on behalf of the
Consortium is applied to the costs of the Consortium in the same pro–rata manner as costs are
assessed. No member shall be entitled to receive an amount in excess of its actual contribution
unless all members receive a pro–rata excess distribution. A party which withdraws pursuant to
Section 2.4 shall forfeit its pro–rata share of a reimbursement, if any such reimbursement exists.
3.7 Nothing herein shall be interpreted to contract away or limit the legislative
authority of the governing legislative body of any Party. Each party shall at its sole discretion
approve or reject the transfer of the Verizon franchise to Frontier.
4. Individually Contracting with the Consultant.
4.1 The consulting contract may also provide for each Party to independently
request certain services provided by the Consultant at the Party’s own cost.
4.2 Bills from the Consultant related to services performed at the request of an
individual Party pursuant to Section 4 shall be billed by the Consultant directly to the requesting
Party. Parties requesting individual services shall indemnify and hold harmless all other Parties
from any cost, claim or liability associated with such individual service by the Consultant.
5. Additional Provisions Required by RCW 39.34.030. In addition to the
provisions previously stated regarding duration, organization and purpose, the following
provisions are included pursuant to the requirements of RCW 39.34.030.
{ERZ730276.DOC;1/00006.080054/}
June 12, 2009
Page 4 of 16
Packet Page 130 of 393
5.1 No joint personal or real property ownership is contemplated under the
terms of this Agreement. All rights to the franchise template shall be jointly shared by the
Parties, with each having the right to use it at its sole discretion as it deems appropriate. Any
individualized work done at the direction of a Party, at the Party’s own cost, shall be and remain
the property of that Party.
5.2 As referenced in Section 1.3, the Parties intend to participate cooperatively
in the evaluation of the Transfer Documents provided by Verizon and Frontier. The evaluation
shall be through the Consortium consisting of a designated representative from each body, and at
the Parties’ discretion, legal counsel as appropriate. Decision–making shall be by consensus,
provided however, that if significant consensus cannot be reached regarding the joint preparation
of a template, voting shall be by weighted vote based upon each Party’s pro–rata share of the
costs.
5.3 This Agreement shall be posted on the City of Edmonds’s website. Parties
not listed in the original web–site posting may be joined when the signature page indicating their
agreement has been posted on either the City of Edmonds’s website or the website of the joining
city, whichever first occurs.
6. Accounting Services. At the Parties’ discretion the Consortium may employ an
accountant to assist in an audit of the transfer of the Verizon franchise to Frontier. The Parties
may choose to hire this accountant as a Consortium, or as a separate group of individual
jurisdictions. The accountant may be an outside entity or may be an employee or a department
of a Party.
6.1 If an audit of Frontier’s financial statements and other financial documents
associated with the transfer of the Verizon franchise is performed (the “Accounting Services”)
by an accountant who is an employee of a Party then that Party may be reimbursed at the rate of
up to $100.00 per hour to compensate it for its direct employee and reasonable administrative
costs. The cost of Accounting Services attributed to the Consortium under this Agreement shall
not exceed a total of $5,000. The rate and the monetary cap include that Party’s own
proportionate share for which that Party is responsible under this Agreement.
6.2 Accounting Services provided by an outside accountant shall not exceed a
total of $20,000 (this amount does not include any monies paid to Consultant or OMW).
6.3 The Parties may expand the monetary cap on Consulting Services only
upon a consensus agreement of the Parties. If a consensus cannot be reached then voting shall be
by weighted vote based upon each Party’s pro–rata share of the costs.
7. Technical Services. At the Parties’ discretion the Consortium may employ a
technical advisor to assist in the audit of the technical capabilities of Frontier and the build-out of
the cable system by Verizon (“Technical Services”). These services shall be in addition to any
Consultant Services provided by the Consultant. The Parties may choose to hire a technical
advisor as a Consortium or as a separate group of individual jurisdictions.
{ERZ730276.DOC;1/00006.080054/}
June 12, 2009
Page 5 of 16
Packet Page 131 of 393
8. Monetary Cap on Consulting Services. The cost of the Consulting Services
under this Agreement shall not exceed a total of $40,000 (this amount does not include any
monies paid to OMW or for Accounting Services or Technical Services provided under Sections
6 and 7 respectively). This monetary cap on fees associated with Consulting Services includes
all fees and related expenses incurred by the Consultant. This monetary cap on fees associated
with Consulting Services does not include additional services requested by an individual Party as
described in Section 4.
8.1 The Parties may expand the monetary cap on Consulting Services only
upon a consensus agreement of the Parties. If a consensus cannot be reached then voting shall be
by weighted vote based upon each Party’s pro–rata share of the costs.
8.2 Following a vote to expand the cap pursuant to Section 8.1, Parties not
desiring to expand the Consulting Services monetary cap may withdraw from this Agreement
pursuant to Section 2.4. The withdrawing Party will only be required to pay its share of the pro–
rata cost incurred up through the time of withdrawal and in no event shall exceed its pro–rata
share of the cap established by Section 6 or previously amended with the approval of the
withdrawing Party, (excluding any individually authorized services provided by Consultant).
9. Monetary Cap on OMW Services. OMW will facilitate, organize, report and
communicate with the Consortium, Consultant, accountant, technical advisors, Verizon and
Frontier, and any other interested party on behalf of the Consortium. Additionally, OMW will
provide the services of an assistant negotiator on behalf of the Consortium and will act as the
administrator and point of contact for the Consortium. Services to the Consortium will be
provided by Elana Zana at a billing rate of $180 per hour. The cost of OMW services attributed
to the Consortium under this Agreement shall not exceed a total of $7,000 (this amount does not
include any monies paid to Consultant or for Accounting Services or Technical Services
provided under Sections 6 and 7 respectively). This monetary cap on fees associated with OMW
services includes all legal and administrative services and costs performed on behalf of the
Consortium.
9.1 The Parties may expand the monetary cap on OMW services only upon a
consensus agreement of the Parties. If a consensus cannot be reached then voting shall be by
weighted vote based upon each Party’s pro–rata share of the costs.
9.2 Following a vote to expand the cap pursuant to Section 9, Parties not
desiring to expand the OMW services monetary cap may withdraw from this Agreement
pursuant to Section 2.4. The withdrawing Party will only be required to pay its share of the pro–
rata cost incurred up through the time of withdrawal and in no event shall exceed its pro–rata
share of the cap established by Section 9 or previously amended with the approval of the
withdrawing Party (excluding any individually authorized legal services).
10. Designated Representatives. The County Executive, City Manager or Mayor of
each entity shall designate a representative (“Designated Representative”). Notice to the
Designated Representative shall be undertaken through e-mail contacts, provided, however, that
{ERZ730276.DOC;1/00006.080054/}
June 12, 2009
Page 6 of 16
Packet Page 132 of 393
any decision to terminate the participation of any Party shall be given in writing and shall be
effective when provided to the City of Edmonds, Washington at:
City of Edmonds
attn: Stephen Clifton
121 5th Ave. No.
Edmonds, WA 98020
425-775-2525
with a copy to: Elana Zana
Ogden Murphy Wallace, P.L.L.C.
1601 Fifth Avenue
Suite 2100
Seattle, WA 98101
206-442-1308
11. Dispute Resolution.
11.1 Any disputes or questions of interpretation of this Agreement that may
arise between Parties shall be governed under the Dispute Resolution provisions in this Section
11. The Parties agree that cooperation and communication are essential to resolving issues
efficiently. The Parties agree to exercise their best efforts to resolve any disputes that may arise
through this dispute resolution process, rather than in the media or through other external means.
11.2 The Parties agree to use their best efforts to prevent and resolve potential
sources of conflict through discussion among the Consortium’s members.
11.3 The Parties agree to use their best efforts to resolve disputes arising out of
or related to this Agreement using good faith negotiations. If unsuccessful, the Parties may but
are not obligated to utilize mediation. The costs of mediation shall be shared equally between
the Parties to the dispute and the remaining members of the Consortium. As an illustration, if
two Parties, A & B, dispute a billing procedure and cost, they shall share the costs of mediation
with the remaining members of the Consortium. Party A, 25%, Party B, 25%, and the
Consortium, 50% (divided pro–rata among the other Parties as a cost pursuant to Section 3.1).
11.4 Except as otherwise specified in this Agreement, in the event the dispute is
not resolved in mediation or the Parties do not agree to mediation, the Parties are free to file suit.
At all times prior to resolution of the dispute, the Parties shall continue to perform and make any
required payments under this Agreement in the same manner and under the same terms as
existed prior to the dispute.
12. Confidentiality. The Parties agree to adhere to the Confidentiality Agreement
attached hereto as Exhibit C.
{ERZ730276.DOC;1/00006.080054/}
June 12, 2009
Page 7 of 16
Packet Page 133 of 393
13. No Indemnity. Except as specifically provided in Sections 3.4 and 4.2, no
indemnity is imposed by this Agreement. The Parties agree to bear their respective liability to
the extent and in the percentage determined under the laws of the State of Washington.
14. General Provisions.
14.1 The Parties shall not unreasonably withhold requests for information,
approvals or consents provided for in this Agreement. The Parties agree to take further actions
and execute further documents, either jointly or within their respective powers and authority, to
implement the intent of this Agreement. The Parties agree to work cooperatively with each other
to achieve the mutually agreeable goals as set forth in this Agreement.
14.2 This Agreement shall be interpreted, construed and enforced in accordance
with the laws of the State of Washington. Venue for any action under this Agreement shall be
King County, Washington.
14.3 This Agreement is made and entered into for the sole protection and
benefit of the Parties hereto. No other person shall have any right of action based upon any
provision of this Agreement.
14.4 This Agreement has been reviewed and revised by legal counsel for all
Parties and no presumption or rule that ambiguity shall be construed against the Party drafting
the document shall apply to the interpretation or enforcement of this Agreement.
14.5 Each Party shall be responsible for its own costs, including legal fees,
incurred in negotiating or finalizing this Agreement, unless otherwise agreed in writing by the
Parties.
14.6 The Parties shall not be deemed in default with provisions of this
Agreement where performance was rendered impossible by war or riots, civil disturbances,
floods or other natural catastrophes beyond their control; the unforeseeable unavailability of
labor or materials; or labor stoppages or slow downs, or power outages exceeding back–up
power supplies. This Agreement shall not be revoked or a Party penalized for such
noncompliance, provided that such Party takes immediate and diligent steps to bring itself back
into compliance and to comply as soon as practicable under the circumstances without unduly
endangering the health, safety, and integrity of the Parties’ employees or property, or the health,
safety, and integrity of the public, Public Right-of-Way, public property, or private property.
14.7 This Agreement may be amended only by a written instrument executed
by each of the Parties hereto. No failure to exercise and no delay in exercising, on the part of
any Party hereto, any rights, power or privilege hereunder shall operate as a waiver hereof,
except as expressly provided herein.
14.8 This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement of the Parties with
respect to the subject matters hereof, and supersedes any and all prior negotiations (oral and
written), understandings and agreements with respect hereto.
{ERZ730276.DOC;1/00006.080054/}
June 12, 2009
Page 8 of 16
Packet Page 134 of 393
14.9 Section headings are intended as information only, and shall not be
construed with the substance of the section they caption.
14.10 In construction of this Agreement, words used in the singular shall include
the plural and the plural the singular, and “or” is used in the inclusive sense, in all cases where
such meanings would be appropriate.
14.11 This Agreement may be executed in several counterparts, each of which
shall be deemed an original, and all counterparts together shall constitute but one and the same
instrument.
14.12 In case any term of this Agreement shall be held invalid, illegal or
unenforceable in whole or in part, neither the validity of the remaining part of such term nor the
validity of the remaining terms of this Agreement shall in any way be affected thereby.
14.13 The provisions of Sections 3.1, 4.2, and 12 shall survive termination of
this Agreement or the withdrawal of any Party.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the Parties hereto has executed this Agreement by
having its authorized representative affix his/her name in the appropriate space below:
SNOHOMISH COUNTY:
Date:
By:
Its
CITY OF BOTHELL:
Date:
By:
Its
CITY OF EDMONDS:
Date:
By:
Its
{ERZ730276.DOC;1/00006.080054/}
June 12, 2009
Page 9 of 16
Packet Page 135 of 393
CITY OF EVERETT:
Date:
By:
Its
CITY OF KENMORE:
Date:
By:
Its
CITY OF MARYSVILLE:
Date:
By:
Its
CITY OF MOUNTLAKE TERRACE:
Date:
By:
Its
CITY OF MUKILTEO:
Date:
By:
Its
CITY OF REDMOND:
Date:
By:
Its
{ERZ730276.DOC;1/00006.080054/}
June 12, 2009
Page 10 of 16
Packet Page 136 of 393
CITY OF SHORELINE:
Date:
By:
Its
CITY OF WOODINVILLE:
Date:
By:
Its
TOWN OF WOODWAY:
Date:
By:
Its
{ERZ730276.DOC;1/00006.080054/}
June 12, 2009
Page 11 of 16
Packet Page 137 of 393
EXHIBIT A
RIVER OAKS SCOPE OF WORK
This Scope of Work will be performed by River Oaks as follows:
Federal Law Requirement of Acceptance or Rejection of Transfer within 120 days:
A. Before the 30 day Federal deadline, draft a letter to Frontier and Verizon informing
Verizon and Frontier of additional questions which need to be answered and why the
transfer application is incomplete. This letter will discuss questions relating to the financial,
legal and technical qualifications of Frontier.
B. Ensure that both the LFA’s and Verizon/Frontier are compliant with 47 C.F.R. 76.502 and
the Cable Acts regarding the Transfer.
C. Review any additional correspondence or response from Frontier and Verizon regarding
Requests for Consent to Transfer of Control of Franchisee or any supplemental information.
Review Verizon Communications, Inc.’s and Frontier Communications Corporation’s
Forms FCC 394 and Exhibits. In the context of this complex financial transaction, review
the Distribution Agreement along with the Agreement and Plan of Merger and Request for
Consent to Transfer of Control of Franchisee with respect to identifying legal, financial and
technical-related issues.
D. Request follow-up answers (where needed) from Frontier and Verizon to other pertinent
questions and obtain required information from them and address the impact upon the 120
day review period as prescribed under Federal Law which runs from receipt of a complete
submittal.
E. Assist the LFAs in their review of existing Franchises with Verizon Northwest Inc. and its
Affiliates for past performance/compliance issues.
F. Correspond and negotiate with Verizon’s and Frontier’s legal counsel regarding Consortium
matters.
Financial and Accounting Matters:
G. Work closely with in-house LFA finance/accounting departments in the financial review
process and facilitate that review. If necessary, work with an outside accounting firm to be
designated by the LFAs. That accounting firm will be an additional cost to the Consortium
outside of the River Oaks fees and expenses.
H. Make inquiries as to whether Frontier will be able to financially meet its Franchise
obligations and continuing responsibilities, including build-out and construction of the FIOS
system. Review pertinent portions of the 10-K and raise questions regarding the debt being
taken on by Frontier and its potential impact upon Frontier’s ongoing operations.
{ERZ730276.DOC;1/00006.080054/}
June 12, 2009
Page 12 of 16
Packet Page 138 of 393
Technical Issues:
I. Request a representation and warranty from Verizon/Frontier regarding the cable system
build-out. Review such representation and warranty as well as a one page overview cable
system map for each LFA to be provided by Verizon/Frontier to determine if Verizon has
fulfilled its cable system build-out obligations in each LFA Franchise.
J. Discuss with Frontier where their technical people will be located and what their response
time will be to citizen inquiries and complaints.
K. Inquire as to the cable television customer service capabilities of Frontier and the locations
of its customer service centers.
L. If necessary, negotiate with Verizon and Frontier regarding an increase in security such as
performance and construction bonds related to the build-out of the cable systems.
Other Steps:
M. Work on other Consortium cable franchise transfer matters as requested.
It shall be the LFAs’ decision whether to transfer or not transfer the existing cable franchises with
Verizon.
Fee Schedule
In consideration of the services to be performed, the LFAs agree to pay River Oaks on a time and
reimbursable cost basis according to the following schedule:
Tom Duchen, President - $245 per hour plus expenses
Bob Duchen, Vice President - $245 per hour plus expenses
Reimbursable direct costs:
- Federal Express
- Postage
- Long Distance Telephone Charges
- Outside Clerical
- Faxes
- Copies
- Travel at one-half the hourly rate (upon request)
Additional Services
Upon request, River Oaks will work with an individual LFA to address LFA specific issues at the
hourly rate plus expenses as noted above.
{ERZ730276.DOC;1/00006.080054/}
June 12, 2009
Page 13 of 16
Packet Page 139 of 393
EXHIBIT B
APRIL 2008 POPULATION ESTIMATES &
BREAK DOWN OF THE ESTIMATED PRO RATA SHARE
Population information from the Washington State Office of Financial Management. All
population estimates are from April 2008, except for Snohomish County which is based on the
April 2006, Washington State Office of Financial Management population estimate for the
proposed build-out area by Verizon.
The data provided below is for informational purposes only. The total pro-rata share per Party
will depend on the number of Parties agreeing to join or contract with this Consortium. These
costs are also subject to change depending on the discretion of the Parties to engage an
accountant to perform Accounting Services pursuant to Section 6 or a technical advisor to
perform Technical Services pursuant to Section 7. These costs also do not include any
independent services provided by Consultant or OMW at the request of individual parties.
County/City OFM 4/1/2008
Population
Percentage of
Total
Consortium
Population
Ogden Murphy
Wallace
River Oaks Costs Total
Snohomish County 228,488 44.42% 2,887.15$ 7,774.30$ 10,661.44$
City of Everett 102,300 19.89% 1,292.65$ 4,585.30$ 5,877.95$
City of Edmonds 40,760 7.92% 515.04$ 3,030.08$ 3,545.12$
City of Marysville 37,060 7.20% 468.29$ 2,936.57$ 3,404.86$
City of Bothell 32,860 6.39% 415.22$ 2,830.43$ 3,245.65$
City of Mountlake Terrace 20,930 4.07% 264.47$ 2,528.94$ 2,793.41$
City of Kenmore 20,220 3.93% 255.50$ 2,511.00$ 2,766.49$
City of Mukilteo 20,050 3.90% 253.35$ 2,506.70$ 2,760.05$
City of Woodinville 10,560 2.05% 133.43$ 2,266.87$ 2,400.30$
Town of Woodway 1,180 0.23%14.91$ 2,029.82$ 2,044.73$
Total 514,408 100% 6,500.00$ 33,000.00$ 39,500.00$
{ERZ730276.DOC;1/00006.080054/}
June 12, 2009
Page 14 of 16
Packet Page 140 of 393
EXHIBIT C
CONSORTIUM CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT
1. The Parties agree that, while they shall be under no obligation to do so, they may from time to
time choose, in their respective individual discretion, to exchange among themselves during the
pendency of the Consortium any joint materials that are relevant and appropriate to the
Consortium. The term “Consortium Materials” shall also include any materials developed for
negotiation purposes at the expense of the Parties.
2. Each Party agrees that any documents or materials (hereinafter termed “Consortium
Materials”) it receives from the other Parties or their Counsel, or created at their joint expense
under the Agreement, shall be treated and maintained as privileged and confidential
communications between Counsel and Parties. It is further understood and agreed that
information that is (a) obtained by any of the Parties from any of the other Parties or (b)
developed on behalf of any or all of the Parties, will remain confidential and shall be protected
from disclosure to any third party except as provided herein.
3. The Parties further agree that they will not disclose these Consortium Materials or the
contents thereof, or information regarding the discussions and preparations for negotiations with
Verizon, to any person or entity other than the Parties, the Consultant, OMW, their Counsel,
consultants, employees or agents, without first obtaining the consent of all Parties who may be
entitled to claim any privilege with respect to such materials.
4. If any person or entity requests or demands, by subpoena, public disclosure request, or
otherwise, all or any portion of the designated Consortium Materials, the Party receiving such
request or demand will immediately notify Counsel for each of the Parties of such request or
demand. Counsel for each of the Parties, as applicable, will take all steps necessary to permit the
assertion of all applicable rights and privileges with respect to said Consortium Materials and
shall cooperate fully in any judicial proceeding relating in any manner to the Consortium
Materials. However, this Agreement is not voided if released via a court order by a court or
administrative agency of competent jurisdiction.
5. Pending the completion of the negotiation process, all Consortium Materials will remain
confidential until the last Consortium member approves or denies a franchise. Upon approval of
a franchise agreement by any member the final agreement shall become a public document to the
full extent required by law.
6. Consortium Materials shall be used only for purposes of this Consortium and any subsequent
related action and shall not be disclosed in any way that is inconsistent with the maintenance of
the attorney–client privilege, work product privilege, or any other privilege of any Party or any
Counsel in connection with the Consortium.
7. This Agreement shall apply to any and all joint conferences or communications, whether
written or oral, conducted by or between the Parties, and to all communications, whether written
or oral, made between the Parties, arising from or in connection with the Consortium.
{ERZ730276.DOC;1/00006.080054/}
June 12, 2009
Page 15 of 16
Packet Page 141 of 393
{ERZ730276.DOC;1/00006.080054/}
June 12, 2009
Page 16 of 16
8. This Agreement memorializes prior oral understandings among the Parties and their Counsel
with respect to Consortium Materials and negotiations and communications.
9. Each Party shall be obligated to maintain the confidentiality and privileged nature of the
Consortium Materials to the extent defined herein. This obligation shall survive the withdrawal
of any and all of the Parties from this Agreement or the termination of this Agreement.
10. Each Party agrees that the attorney–client, work product, joint defense, and other privileges
applicable to the Consortium Materials may not be waived by any Party or its Counsel without
the prior written consent of the Party or Parties that produced, generated or otherwise
communicated that privileged information sought to be disclosed.
Packet Page 142 of 393
P
ATTORN
W. Scott Snyder
Elana R. Zana
(206)447-7000
June 1I.2009
Re:Potential Conflict of Interest Waiver
Dear Consortium Member Jurisdictions:
Following the submittal by Verizon Northwest, Inc. ("Verizon") and Frontier Communications,
Inc. ("Frontier") of the intent to transfer the Verizon franchise to Frontier, several members of
the previous North Puget Sound Consortium and some additional jurisdictions have agreed to
form a new Consortium to evaluate the transfer documents associated with the transfer of the
Verizon franchise. Before engaging in the service as the administrator of the Consortium and if
required as negotiator for the Consortium it is necessary that we request a conflict waiver from
each of the jurisdictions involved with the Consortium.
The following jurisdictions have been invited to participate in this Consortium: City of Bothell,
City of Edmonds, City of Everett, City of Kenmore, City of Marysville, City of Mountlake
Terrace, City of Mukilteo, Snohomish County, City of Woodinville and Town of Woodway. Of
these cities, Ogden Murphy 'Wallace represents the cities of Edmonds, Mukilteo, Redmond,
Woodinville and the Town of Woodway. In the past, we have represented Snohomish County,
Shoreline and Bothell. We will be advising our client cities under a joint representation
agreement if any separate evaluations or negotiations are necessary. Mr. Snyder will not be
representing the Consortium, but will be acting in a supervisory role throughout the process and
will be the lead counsel on behalf of Ogden Murphy Wallace client cities.
Our Rules of Professional Conduct (the State standards goveming our ethical obligations)
discourage us from representing the Consortium members as a group unless you each consent
after full disclosure. A risk of common representation is that there could arise a future conflict
between the parties. In the event of a future conflict, llds. Zana will withdraw from further
representation in this matter for the Consortium members and will only represent our client
cities. However, if we have acquired confidential knowledge or information about any of the
other Consortium jurisdictions that could be used to the benefit of our client cities with regard to
the conflict, we will withdraw from further representation of all parties as it relates to the
conflict. Obviously, our firm will at all times take all reasonable steps to safeguard the
confidentiality of all of your affairs as you each may require.
In addition, the Consortium Interlocal Agreement was drafted by Ms. Zana. It will be approved
by separate counsel for other jurisdictions, but we request your waiver with regard to our
Esroblished 1902
A Member of lhe lnlernctionol Lowyers Network with independent member lcrw firms worldwide
,r??,1;|[â::t,Scfi,å"03Ju08**:a,!"ottlu,wn e8l0l lóBó . 206 447.7ooa . Fox:206 447o2t5 . web:www.omwlowcom
Packet Page 143 of 393
Consortium Member Jurisdictions
June 1I,2009
Page2
involvement in the creation of the Consortium. If you do not wish to waive this aspect, we
encourage you to retain separate counsel to review the Interlocal Agreement.
'We have concluded that the interests of each member of the Consortium are aligned such that at
present there is no actual conflict of interest between the cities or the County in this matter. We
will, however, be happy to discuss any reservations that any of you have regarding these matters.
'We also recommend that you review this letter with other counsel before making a decision, but
you are not obligated to do so if you do not wish to.
If the conditions contained in this letter meet with your approval, we ask that you execute the
enclosed copy of this letter, date it, and return it to Ogden Mr.phy Wallace for our files.
Very truly yours,
MURPHY V/ALLACE. P.L.L.C.
CONSENTED TO THIS DAY OF
CITY OF BOTHELL
2009
CITY OF EDMONDS
OGDEN
Uffau
W. Scott Elana R. Zana
By:
Its:
By:
Its:
CITY OF EVERETT CITY OF KENMORE
By:
Its:
By:
Its:
{ERZ7 306 12.DOC; I /00006.080054/}
Packet Page 144 of 393
Consortium Member Jurisdictions
June L'i..2009
Page3
CITY OF MARYSVILLE CITY OF MOUNTLAKE TERRACE
By:
Its:
SNOHOMISH COUNTY
By:
Its:
CITY OF WOODINVILLE
By:
Its:
TOWN OF TVOODWAY
By:
Its:
By:
Its;
{ERz1 306 12.DOC; 1 i00006.080054/ }
Packet Page 145 of 393
AM-2329 2.G.
RCW 35.103 Annual Compliance Report - 2008
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:06/16/2009
Submitted By:Tom Tomberg, Fire Time:Consent
Department:Fire Type:Action
Review Committee:Public Safety
Committee Action:Approved for Consent Agenda
Information
Subject Title
RCW 35.103 Annual Compliance Report - 2008.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Approve. The Public Safety Committee reviewed this agenda item on June 9 and directed
placement on the Council Consent Agenda with a recommendation to approve.
Upon Council approval, the RCW 35.103 Annual Compliance Report - 2008 will be posted on the
Fire Department website.
Previous Council Action
On November 28, 2006, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 1133 which adopts
performance, policy, standards, and objectives outlined in Washington Legislature Substitute
House Bill 1756 as the Edmonds Fire Department emergency resource deployment and response
time objectives. Since adoption, SHB 1756 has been codified as RCW 35.103.
Narrative
RCW 35.103 requires annual evaluation of Council-adopted levels of service, deployment
delivery methods, and response time objectives. Evaluation is based on data relating to the levels
of service, deployment, and the achievement of each response time objective established by the
Council. Response time data is extracted from emergency information entered into the Fire
Department records management system by Department personnel.
Attached is the RCW 35.103 Annual Compliance Report - 2008 based on 2008 data. The heart of
the report appears in Sections 3 and 4, pages 6 through 12.
Fiscal Impact
Fiscal Year:2008
Revenue:
Expenditure:
Fiscal Impact:
None.
Attachments
Packet Page 146 of 393
Link: RCW 35.103 Compliance Report
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 06/10/2009 02:57 PM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 06/10/2009 02:59 PM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 06/10/2009 03:02 PM APRV
Form Started By: Tom
Tomberg
Started On: 06/10/2009 11:27
AM
Final Approval Date: 06/10/2009
Packet Page 147 of 393
RCW 35.103 ANNUAL COMPLIANCE REPORT – 2008
BACKGROUND
On November 28, 2006, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 1133 adopting the
performance, policy, standards, and objectives outlined in Washington Legislature
Substitute House Bill 1756 as the Edmonds Fire Department emergency resource
deployment and response time objectives. Since passage by the State Legislature, SHB
1756 has been codified as RCW 35.103. The new code title will be referenced where
appropriate in the remainder of this document and in all future references.
RCW 35.103 requires the evaluation of the Council-adopted levels of service,
deployment delivery methods, and response time objectives on an annual basis. The
evaluations are based on data relating to the levels of service, deployment, and the
achievement of each response time objective established by Council. The response time
data is extracted from emergency information entered into the Fire Department records
management system by Department personnel using WebFIRS software. The evaluation
was initially delivered to the Council and the public beginning in 2008 with the
comparison of 2006 data against the adopted standards. Below is the RCW 35.103
Annual Compliance Report for 2009 based on 2008 data. The heart of the report
appears in Sections 3 and 4.
2008 COMPLIANCE REPORT CONTENTS
As required by RCW 35.103, the 2008 Compliance Report includes four Sections:
• Section 1: Council Resolution 1133
• Section 2: Five Policy Statements that prove the existence of the Fire
Department, describes services the Department provides, the Department’s
organizational structure, the expected number of Department employees, and the
functions those employees are expected to perform.
• Section 3: Comparison of 2008 response times to each adopted response
standard.
• Section 4: An explanation of why Council-adopted standards are not met, the
predictable consequences of failing to meet the adopted standards, the steps
necessary to correct deficiencies in order to achieve compliance.
SECTION 1……………………………………………………………………………..2
SECTION 2……………………………………………………………………………..5
SECTION 3……………………………………………………………………………..6
SECTION 4……………………………………………………………………………..10
1
Packet Page 148 of 393
SECTION 1
RESOLUTION NO. 1133
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON, ADOPTING THE PERFORMANCE POLICY,
STANDARDS AND OBJECTIVES OUTLINED IN
SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 1756 AS EDMONDS FIRE
DEPARTMENT EMERGENCY RESOURCE DEPLOYMENT
AND RESPONSE TIME OBJECTIVES.
WHEREAS, the Edmonds Fire Department is legally established as a fire
department through Ordinance No. 254 approved by the City of Edmonds City Council
on October 16, 1912 to provide for the prevention of and protection from fire in the city
and whose emergency services now include fire suppression, emergency medical
services at the basic life support-defibrillator and advanced life support levels, hazardous
materials response, technical rescue response, marine rescue and fire suppression, and
disaster preparedness and response; and,
WHEREAS, the Edmonds Fire Department has a mission statement and
goals and objectives to guide the organization in providing emergency services that
include fire suppression, emergency medical services at the basic life support-
defibrillator and advanced life support levels, hazardous materials response, technical
rescue response, marine rescue and fire suppression, and disaster preparedness and
response; and,
WHEREAS, the Edmonds Fire Department has a basic organizational
structure which includes elected officials, Chief Fire Officers, Fire Officers, Firefighters,
Firefighter/Paramedics and Firefighter/EMTs; and,
WHEREAS, the Edmonds Fire Department has a certain number of
members now and in the future who perform the tasks required to accomplish the
response objectives; and,
2
Packet Page 149 of 393
WHEREAS, the Edmonds Fire Department is required by state law to
establish turnout and response time goals for the emergency services is provides; and,
WHEREAS, the Edmonds Fire Department has evaluated the elements
identified in SHB 1756 and included those provisions deemed appropriate in the
Department’s emergency service delivery; and,
WHEREAS, the Edmonds Fire Department has developed written
response coverage objectives required to comply with applicable provisions of SHB
1756; and,
WHEREAS, the response coverage document is in furtherance of the City
of Edmonds duty to the public at large and does not create a specific duty to any
individual in the event of an emergency response; and
WHEREAS, each emergency response occurs under a unique set of
circumstances and competing emergency needs may impact response in any specific
situation; and
WHEREAS, the City of Edmonds obligation to respond to emergency
incidents consistent with the Fire Department emergency resource deployment and
response time objectives may be impacted by circumstances and competing emergency
needs, the City of Edmonds, its officers, agents and employees shall have no duty to
respond according to any specific response standard, and shall incur no liability
whatsoever for failing to do so; therefore,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON,
HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
The City Council of the City of Edmonds hereby adopts the response
coverage document attached as Exhibit A as the Edmonds Fire Department’s official
policy for determining emergency medical, fire and rescue resource deployment; and,
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED:
3
Packet Page 150 of 393
The adopted response coverage document officially
defines the Edmonds Fire Department’s written policies and procedures that establish
the distribution and concentration of fixed and mobile resources of the department; and,
This resolution was adopted at a regularly scheduled public meeting of the Edmonds
City Council for the Edmonds Fire Department on November 28, 2006.
RESOLVED this 28th day of November 2006.
APPROVED:
Gary Haakenson
MAYOR, GARY HAAKENSON
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED:
Sandra S. Chase
CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: 11/28/06
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: 11/28/06
RESOLUTION NO. 1133
4
Packet Page 151 of 393
SECTION 2
POLICY STATEMENTS
The Fire Department maintains written policy statements that establishes the
following:
1. The existence of the Fire Department is verified by Resolution No. 1133.
__X__meets requirement_____does not meet
2. Services that the Fire Department is required to provide are addressed in Resolution
No. 1133.
__X__meets requirement_____does not meet
3. The basic organizational structure of the Fire Department is as depicted in the
organizational chart adopted by Council as part of the 2008-08 biennial budget on
November 15, 2005, and the 2008-2008 budget adopted by Council on November
21, 2006.
__X__meets requirement_____does not meet
4. The expected number of Fire Department employees for 2008 is 54 as adopted by
Council as part of the 2008 biennial budget on November 21, 2006. A breakdown by
position appears in Appendix E (not shown).
__X___meets requirement_____does not meet
5. The functions Fire Department employees are expected to perform are listed in
Edmonds Fire Department SOP 501.01 Mission Statement.
__X___meets requirement_____does not meet
5
Packet Page 152 of 393
SECTION 3
STANDARDS OF RESPONSE COMPARISON (STANDARD OF COVER)
To measure the ability to arrive and begin mitigation operations before the critical events
of “brain death” or “flashover” occur, the Fire Department is required to establish
response time objectives, and compare the actual department results on an annual basis
against the established objectives. The comparison began in 2007 with a comparison of
the established response objectives against actual 2006 response times for the levels of
response. This year, actual 2008 response time data is compared against the originally
established, Council-adopted 2006 standard. This section provides that comparison.
1. Turnout time for all emergency incidents
Turnout Time Standard: The Fire Department has adopted a turn out time
standard of 2:45, which the department should meet 90% of the time.
Actual Department Comparison for the Year 2008: The Fire Department did
meet the turn out time objective 90% of the time; 90% of the Fire Department
incidents experienced a turn out time of 2:34 minutes/seconds.
2A. Response time off the first-arriving Engine Company to a fire suppression
incident
Response Time Standard: The Fire Department has adopted a response/travel
time standard of 6:30 for the arrival of the first engine company at a fire
suppression incident, which the department should meet 90% of the time.
Actual Department Comparison for the Year 2008: The Fire Department did not
meet the response time objective 90% of the time; 90% of fire suppression
incidents had the first engine arrive at the scene within 6:41 minutes/seconds
of response time.
2B. Response time for the deployment of full first alarm assignment to a residential
fire suppression incident
Response Time Standard: The Fire Department has adopted a response/travel
time standard of 7:45 for the arrival of the full complement of a first alarm
response to a residential fire suppression incident, which the department
should meet 90% of the time. The Fire Department has adopted a first alarm
response of 15 firefighters.
Actual Department Comparison for the Year 2008: The Fire Department did not
meet the full deployment response time objective 90% of the time; 90% of fire
suppression incidents had the full deployment of first alarm responding
personnel and equipment arrive at the scene within 10:30 minutes/seconds of
response time.
6
Packet Page 153 of 393
2C. Response time for the deployment of full first alarm assignment to a
commercial fire suppression incident
Response Time Standard: The Fire Department has adopted a response/travel
time standard of 9 minutes for the arrival of the full complement of a first alarm
response to a commercial fire suppression incident, which the department
should meet 90% of the time. The Fire Department has adopted a first alarm
response of 18 firefighters.
Actual Department Comparison for the Year 2008: The Fire Department did not
meet the full deployment response time objective 90% of the time; 90% of fire
suppression incidents had the full deployment of first alarm responding
personnel and equipment arrive at the scene within 10:00 minutes/seconds of
response time.
3. Response time of the first-arriving unit with a first responder (BLS) or higher
level capability to an emergency medical incident
Response Time Standard: The Fire Department has adopted a response/travel
time standard of 5:15 for the arrival of the first emergency medical unit with
appropriately trained personnel on board (BLS) to an emergency medical
incident, which the department should meet 90% of the time.
Actual Department Comparison for the Year 2008: The Fire Department did not
meet the response time objective 90% of the time; 90% of emergency medical
incidents had the first-arriving first responder (BLS) arrive at the scene within
5:35 minutes/seconds of response time.
4. Response time for the arrival of an advanced life support (two Paramedics) unit
to an emergency medical incident.
Response Time Standard: The Fire Department has adopted a response/travel
time standard of 6:45 for the arrival of an advanced life support unit with
appropriately trained personnel (two Paramedics) on board to an ALS
emergency medical incident, which the department should meet 90% of the
time.
Actual Department Comparison for the Year 2008: The Fire Department did not
meet the response time objective 90% of the time; 90% of emergency medical
incidents had the Advance Life Support (two Paramedics) unit arrive at the
scene within 6:53 minutes/seconds of response time.
5A1. Response time of the first-arriving apparatus with appropriately trained and
equipped Hazardous Materials Operations level personnel on board to a
hazardous materials incident.
Response Time Standard: The Fire Department has adopted a response/travel
time standard of 6:30 for the arrival of the first unit with appropriately trained
and equipped Hazardous Materials Operations level personnel on board to a
hazardous materials incident, which the department should meet 90% of the
time.
7
Packet Page 154 of 393
Actual Department Comparison for the Year 2008: The Fire Department did
meet the response time objective 90% of the time. 90% of hazardous materials
incidents had trained and equipped Hazardous Materials Operations level
personnel arrive at the scene within 5:05 minutes/seconds of response time.
5A2. Response time of the first-arriving apparatus with appropriately trained and
equipped Hazardous Materials Technician level personnel on board to a
hazardous materials incident.
Response Time Standard: The Fire Department has adopted a response/travel
time standard of 12 minutes for the arrival of the first unit with appropriately
trained and equipped Hazardous Materials Technician level personnel on
board to a hazardous materials incident, which the department should meet
90% of the time.
Actual Department Comparison for the Year 2008: The Fire Department did
meet the response time objective 90% of the time. 90% of hazardous materials
incidents had trained and equipped Hazardous Materials Technician level
personnel arrive at the scene within 6:48 minutes/seconds of response time.
5B1. Response time of the first-arriving apparatus with appropriately trained and
equipped Technical Rescue Operations level personnel on board to a technical
rescue incident.
Response Time Standard: The Fire Department has adopted a response/travel
time standard of 6:30 for the arrival of the first unit with appropriately trained
and equipped Technical Rescue Operations level personnel on board to a
technical rescue incident, which the department should meet 90% of the time.
Actual Department Comparison for the Year 2008: The Fire Department did
meet the response time objective 90% of the time; 90% of technical rescue
incidents had trained and equipped Technical Rescue Operations level
personnel arrive at the scene within 5:10 minutes/seconds of response time.
5B2. Response time of the first-arriving apparatus with appropriately trained and
equipped Technical Rescue Technician level personnel on board to a technical
rescue incident.
Response Time Standard: The Fire Department has adopted a response/travel
time standard of 12 minutes for the arrival of the first unit with appropriately
trained and equipped Technical Rescue Technician level personnel on board to
a technical rescue incident, which the department should meet 90% of the time.
Actual Department Comparison for the Year 2008: No reportable Incidents.
6. Response time of the first-arriving apparatus with appropriately trained and
equipped Marine Rescue and Firefighting personnel on board to a marine
incident.
8
Packet Page 155 of 393
Response Time Standard: The Fire Department has adopted a response/travel
time standard of 6:30 for the arrival of the first unit with appropriately trained
and equipped Marine Rescue and Firefighting personnel on board to a marine
incident, which the department should meet 90% of the time.
Actual Department Comparison for the Year 2008: The Fire Department did
meet the response time objective 90% of the time; 90% of Marine incidents had
trained and equipped firefighting personnel arrived at the scene within 5:10
minutes/seconds of response time.
.
9
Packet Page 156 of 393
SECTION 4
COUNCIL-ADOPTED STANDARDS NOT MET
RCW 35.103 requires an explanation when Council-adopted standards are not met, the
predictable consequences of failing to meet the adopted standards, the steps necessary
to correct deficiencies in order to achieve compliance.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS NOT MET
Of 11 Council-adopted 2008 performance standards, five were met, five were not met,
and one standard had no reportable incidents to evaluate. The five standards not met in
2008 are:
2A. Response time off the first-arriving Engine Company to a fire suppression
incident
Established: 6:30 Minutes/Seconds
Actual: 6:41 Minutes/seconds
2B. Response time for the deployment of full first alarm assignment to a residential fire
suppression incident
Established: 7:45 Minutes/Seconds
Actual: 10:30 Minutes/seconds
2C. Response time for the deployment of full first alarm assignment to a commercial fire
suppression incident
Established: 9:00 Minutes/Seconds
Actual: 10:00 Minutes/seconds
3. Response time of the first-arriving unit with a first responder (BLS) or higher level
capability to an emergency medical incident
Established: 5:15 Minutes/Seconds
Actual: 5:35 Minutes/Seconds
4. Response time for the arrival of an advanced life support (two Paramedics) unit to an
emergency medical incident.
Established: 6:45 Minutes/Seconds
Actual: 6:53 Minutes/Seconds
PREDICTABLE CONSEQUENCES
Predictable consequences for the deficient standards above include the potential for
greater deterioration in the patient/victim’s medical condition, death, and increased
property loss. Although response times are measurable as a risk factor, other inherent
and varied risk factors that are less measurable also play a large role in outcomes, for
10
Packet Page 157 of 393
example, time lapse between the onset of the emergency, discovery, and reporting;
dispatch center processing; distance traveled; weather and road conditions; access; out-
of-service / unavailable status of emergency units due to training, mechanical, or other
emergencies; patients medical history and lifestyle; presence of bystanders able to
assist; emergency devices that allow bystanders to assist; built-in fire detection and
protection equipment; type of construction; and square footage. The list of variables that
directly and indirectly influence the outcome of a specific emergency incident are not
only numerous but come in various gradations and degrees.
Despite the various factors that affect outcomes that are outside the control of
emergency responders, response times are one factor in the medical chain-of-survival
and structure fire time-temperature curve that governments can affect.
Predictable consequences in four of six standards above are difficult to predict because
the time differences between eight and 20 seconds constitute a deficiency spread that
can be considered nebulous. Also, when working with a 90th percentile, only 10 percent
of the emergency calls fail to meet the time standards. At best, a mild increase in
property loss could occur on fire-related responses, and a delay in treatment for
medically-related incidents may occur.
The 2B standard with the 2:45 minute deficiency – Response time for the deployment of
full first alarm assignment to a residential fire suppression incident, and 2C Standard
with the 1:00 Minute deficiency – Response time for the deployment of full first alarm
assignment to a commercial fire suppression incident – is attributable to the arrival of
automatic aid units and beyond practical control of the Edmonds Fire Department.
CORRECTIVE ACTIONS
The following is a list of proposed actions currently being taken by the Fire Department
and recommendations for City Council consideration to improve overall performance:
o Awareness and Training: Awareness and training will continue to maintain the
current level of service. Training and awareness can be very effective in
improving turnout time, which has improved by 11 seconds from 2007 to 2008.
This improvement is likely attributed to using MDCs (Mobile Data Computers)
creating a more accurate account of turnout time, and the adjustment to the
paging notification system that provided a more expeditious dispatching system.
Awareness and training is not as effective in the response time categories as
station location/geography and call location dictates the successfulness of this
standard.
o Partnerships/regionalization: As mentioned above, two of the five deficient
areas are attributed to automatic and mutual aid resources which the Edmonds
Fire Department does not control. Partnerships and/or regionalizing with other
area departments will allow resources to be used more efficiently and
effectively. These efficiencies could be realized through flexibility in emergency
response resources. An example of this would be a dedicated resource that
could transport patients to the hospital keeping other resources in-service, or a
dedicated resource that would more likely be available locally for emergency
calls. These types of changes are more attainable when working in a larger
geographical area.
11
Packet Page 158 of 393
12
o Station Location: Geography and Station Location would be the most costly
change for the City, but would provide the biggest response time benefit.
Currently, all three of the fire stations are not placed in an optimal location. Site
determination for a training tower with enough room for a new fire station would
create a win-win for both Firefighter training and response location. Initial
evaluation of the data suggests the most feasible location for a replacement
Station 20, constructed in 1952, is a site near Highway 99 at 228th Street. The
second replacement choice is to move Station 17 closer to 212th Street SW and
84th Avenue W (Five Corners).
Packet Page 159 of 393
AM-2330 2.H.
Update City Strategic Plan II. Council Public Safety Objectives
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:06/16/2009
Submitted By:Tom Tomberg, Fire Time:Consent
Department:Fire Type:Action
Review Committee:Public Safety
Committee Action:Approved for Consent Agenda
Information
Subject Title
Update City Strategic Plan II. Council Public Safety Objectives.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Approve. The Public Safety Committee reviewed this agenda item on June 9 and directed
placement on the Council Consent Agenda with a recommendation to approve.
Previous Council Action
•Council discussed a City strategic plan at the March 2004 Retreat.
•Council approved the City Strategic Plan on August 3, 2004.
•Council discussed adding a public safety statement with objectives, and other references to public
safety to the City Strategic Plan at the 2005 and 2006 Retreats.
•On June 27, 2006, Council added Council Public Safety Statement II. with Objectives and other
references to public safety to the City Strategic Plan.
Narrative
The Fire Department requests that dates be updated from the 2007-2008 biennium to reflect the
current 2009-2010 biennium in Council Public Safefy Statement II. Objectives A1 and D1-D4 as
indicated by the strikethroughs on the attachment.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: City Strategic Plan Update, 6-2009
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 06/10/2009 02:57 PM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 06/10/2009 02:59 PM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 06/10/2009 03:02 PM APRV
Form Started By: Tom
Tomberg
Started On: 06/10/2009 11:47
AM
Final Approval Date: 06/10/2009
Packet Page 160 of 393
II
.
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
P
u
b
l
i
c
S
a
f
e
t
y
P
o
l
i
c
y
S
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
:
T
h
e
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
v
i
e
w
s
P
u
b
l
i
c
S
a
f
e
t
y
a
s
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
’
s
t
o
p
p
r
i
o
r
i
t
y
,
a
n
d
s
t
r
i
v
e
s
t
o
of
f
e
r
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
,
b
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
e
s
,
a
n
d
v
i
s
i
t
o
r
s
a
m
u
n
i
c
i
pa
l
e
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
w
h
e
r
e
t
h
e
y
f
e
e
l
s
a
f
e
a
n
d
s
e
c
u
r
e
.
O BJ
E
C
T
I
V
E
S
T AS
K
S
D EL
I
V
E
R
A
B
L
E
S
D UE
T EAM C OST
A.
F
u
n
d
a
n
d
s
t
a
f
f
p
u
b
l
i
c
s
a
f
e
t
y
de
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
s
a
t
l
e
v
e
l
s
s
u
f
f
i
c
i
e
n
t
t
o
se
r
v
e
t
h
e
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
i
n
a
t
i
m
e
l
y
a
n
d
ef
f
e
c
t
i
v
e
m
a
n
n
e
r
.
1.
D
e
s
i
g
n
a
t
e
p
u
b
l
i
c
sa
f
e
t
y
f
o
r
p
r
i
o
r
i
t
y
fu
n
d
i
n
g
i
n
t
h
e
an
n
u
a
l
b
u
d
g
e
t
pr
o
c
e
s
s
.
Pu
b
l
i
c
s
a
f
e
t
y
le
v
e
l
s
o
f
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
an
d
s
t
a
f
f
i
n
g
a
r
e
de
s
i
g
n
a
t
e
d
f
o
r
an
n
u
a
l
p
r
i
o
r
i
t
y
fu
n
d
i
n
g
i
n
t
h
e
bu
d
g
e
t
p
r
o
c
e
s
s
Do
n
e
1
-
1
-
07
9 t
o
1
2
-
31
-
-
0
8
10
Ma
y
o
r
a
n
d
Co
u
n
c
i
l
$ 0
B.
E
s
t
a
b
l
i
s
h
P
o
l
i
c
e
a
n
d
F
i
r
e
l
e
v
e
l
s
o
f
se
r
v
i
c
e
a
n
d
s
t
a
f
f
i
n
g
t
h
a
t
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
f
o
r
pr
o
a
c
t
i
v
e
r
e
s
p
o
n
s
e
s
a
n
d
c
o
m
p
l
y
w
i
t
h
St
a
t
e
s
t
a
t
u
t
e
s
.
1.
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
l
e
v
e
l
s
o
f
se
r
v
i
c
e
a
n
d
r
e
l
a
t
e
d
st
a
f
f
i
n
g
re
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
.
Le
v
e
l
s
o
f
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
an
d
s
t
a
f
f
i
n
g
re
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
.
Fi
r
e
D
o
n
e
11
-
2
8
-
0
6
Co
u
n
c
i
l
Re
s
.
#
1
1
3
3
Fi
r
e
a
n
d
Po
l
i
c
e
Ad
m
i
n
$ 0
2.
A
d
o
p
t
l
e
v
e
l
s
o
f
se
r
v
i
c
e
a
n
d
s
t
a
f
f
i
n
g
Ad
o
p
t
e
d
l
e
v
e
l
s
of
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
a
n
d
st
a
f
f
i
n
g
.
Fi
r
e
D
o
n
e
11
-
2
8
-
0
6
Co
u
n
c
i
l
Re
s
.
#
1
1
3
3
Co
u
n
c
i
l
$ 0
C.
P
o
l
i
c
e
a
n
d
F
i
r
e
l
e
v
e
l
s
o
f
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
a
n
d
st
a
f
f
i
n
g
b
e
c
o
m
e
p
a
r
t
o
f
t
h
e
S
t
r
a
t
e
g
i
c
Pl
a
n
.
1.
I
n
t
e
g
r
a
t
e
p
u
b
l
i
c
sa
f
e
t
y
l
e
v
e
l
s
o
f
se
r
v
i
c
e
a
n
d
s
t
a
f
f
i
n
g
in
t
o
t
h
e
S
t
r
a
t
e
g
i
c
Pl
a
n
Le
v
e
l
s
o
f
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
an
d
s
t
a
f
f
i
n
g
a
r
e
in
t
e
g
r
a
t
e
d
i
n
t
o
th
e
S
t
r
a
t
e
g
i
c
P
l
a
n
Fi
r
e
D
o
n
e
11
-
2
8
-
0
6
Co
u
n
c
i
l
Re
s
.
#
1
1
3
3
Co
u
n
c
i
l
$ 0
D.
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
P
u
b
l
i
c
S
a
f
e
t
y
W
o
r
k
P
l
a
n
s
.
1.
P
r
e
p
a
r
e
m
u
l
t
i
y
e
a
r
pl
a
n
a
s
r
e
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
d
in
d
e
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
a
l
po
l
i
c
i
e
s
.
Mu
l
t
i
y
e
a
r
p
l
a
n
me
t
h
o
d
o
l
o
g
y
i
s
pr
e
p
a
r
e
d
Fi
r
e
D
o
n
e
11
-14
-06
Ma
r
c
h
20
0
9
Fi
r
e
a
n
d
PD
A
d
m
i
n
$ 0
2.
S
u
b
m
i
t
t
h
e
Mu
l
t
i
y
e
a
r
P
l
a
n
Mu
l
t
i
y
e
a
r
P
l
a
n
me
t
h
o
d
o
l
o
g
y
i
s
Fi
r
e
D
o
n
e
11
-14
-06
Pu
b
l
i
c
Sa
f
e
t
y
$ 0
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
16
1
of
39
3
O BJ
E
C
T
I
V
E
S
T AS
K
S
D EL
I
V
E
R
A
B
L
E
S
D UE
T EAM C OST
me
t
h
o
d
o
l
o
g
y
f
o
r
ap
p
r
o
v
a
l
.
ap
p
r
o
v
e
d
.
3-
1
0
-
0
9
Co
m
m
i
t
t
e
e
3.
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
t
h
e
Mu
l
t
i
y
e
a
r
P
l
a
n
.
Mu
l
t
i
y
e
a
r
P
l
a
n
i
s
de
v
e
l
o
p
e
d
an
n
u
a
l
l
y
.
Fi
r
e
D
o
n
e
11
-14
-06
3-
1
7
-
0
9
f
o
r
2
0
0
7
9
20
0
8
10
Fi
r
e
a
n
d
PD
A
d
m
i
n
$ 0
4.
A
d
o
p
t
t
h
e
M
u
l
t
i
y
e
a
r
Pl
a
n
Mu
l
t
i
y
e
a
r
P
l
a
n
i
s
de
v
e
l
o
p
e
d
an
n
u
a
l
l
y
Fi
r
e
D
o
n
e
11
-14
-06
3-
1
7
-
0
9
f
o
r
2
0
0
7
9
20
0
8
10
Co
u
n
c
i
l
,
Ma
y
o
r
$ 0
E.
M
a
i
n
t
a
i
n
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
c
a
p
i
t
a
l
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
wh
i
c
h
s
u
p
p
o
r
t
p
u
b
l
i
c
s
a
f
e
t
y
.
1.
M
a
i
n
t
a
i
n
a
d
e
q
u
a
t
e
re
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
t
o
ma
i
n
t
a
i
n
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
pu
b
l
i
c
s
a
f
e
t
y
fa
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
.
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
p
u
b
l
i
c
sa
f
e
t
y
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
ar
e
a
d
e
q
u
a
t
e
l
y
ma
i
n
t
a
i
n
e
d
.
Bi
e
n
n
i
a
l
l
y
Pu
b
l
i
c
Wo
r
k
s
$ 0
2.
P
l
a
n
a
n
d
s
c
h
e
d
u
l
e
ma
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
o
f
pu
b
l
i
c
s
a
f
e
t
y
fa
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
.
Ma
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
o
f
pu
b
l
i
c
s
a
f
e
t
y
fa
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
i
s
in
c
l
u
d
e
d
i
n
t
h
e
si
x
-
y
e
a
r
C
I
P
.
Bi
e
n
n
i
a
l
l
y
PW
,
F
i
r
e
Ad
m
i
n
,
P
D
Ad
m
i
n
$ 0
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
16
2
of
39
3
AM-2331 2.I.
End of Edmonds Fire Department Volunteer Program
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:06/16/2009
Submitted By:Tom Tomberg, Fire Time:Consent
Department:Fire Type:Action
Review Committee:Public Safety
Committee Action:Approved for Consent Agenda
Information
Subject Title
End of Edmonds Fire Department Volunteer Program.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Approve. The Public Safety Committee reviewed this agenda item on June 9 and directed
placement on the Council Consent Agenda with a recommendation to approve.
Previous Council Action
On October 16, 1912, the City Council passed Ordinance No. 254 formally establishing a Fire
Department. In 1998, Council approved a Fire Department proposal to remove the Paid Reserves
from "combat," that is, no wearing of self-contained breathing apparatus and no interior
firefighting. In 2003, as part of City-wide cutbacks, the Paid Reserves were converted to non-paid
Volunteers through the budget process.
Narrative
Until the 1960s, all City "Firefighters" were unpaid "Volunteers." In 1965, the City hired its first
"paid" Fire Chief, and a Sleeper Program was established. "Sleepers" would spend five nights out
of the week in a fire station and be compensated for the number of alarms to which they
responded. Over time, the Sleeper Program evolved into the Paid Reserve Program. "Paid
Reserves" did not sleep in fire stations but responded if available when summoned by career
personnel to emergency incidents. Reserves were paid the minimum hourly wage, with one
exception for a long-serving member, for training and emergency response.
In 1998 Council action to withdraw the Paid Reserves from combat was taken because of the
reported difficulty in keeping the Reserves current in their training as required by the State of
Washington. The 2003 Council action converting the Reserves to unpaid Volunteers was prompted
by severe budget problems.
There are currently four unpaid Volunteers. Over the years the program has suffered for a variety
of reasons: (1) removal from combat status: (2) conversion from paid status to unpaid Volunteers;
(3) program turnover; (4) continuing budget problems; (5) the general drop in fire service
volunteering in this area and in urban areas nationally.
However, Edmonds Volunteers will continue to serve the City and Southwest Snohomish County.
Effective Septpember 30, 2009, the four remaining Edmonds Volunteers will leave the program
Packet Page 163 of 393
and affiliate with the Snohomish County Fire District #1 Volunteer Program. Due to its size,
District #1 is able to support a Volunteer Program that provides: (1) assignment to one of four
platoons (shifts) for emergency call-out purposes: (2) a rank structure; (3) assignment to a specific
emergency function such as Air Support, Rehabilitation, Staging, etc.; (4) compensation based on
an earned points system; and (5) training and emergency response opportunities throughout the
response area served by Fire District #1 and its automatic aid partners (including Edmonds).
When the four Edmonds Volunteers transfer their affiliation to Fire District #1 on September 30,
their annual pension payment ($60 per person) and annual insurance payment ($30) will be current
with the Washington Board of Volunteer Firefighters.
The City and the Fire Department appreciate the dedicated service to the many, many Volunteers,
Sleepers, and Reserves who have served Edmonds citizens in one form or another as Volunteers
since 1904.
Fiscal Impact
Fiscal Year:2010
Revenue:
Expenditure:
Fiscal Impact:
When the Edmonds Volunteers transfer their affiliation to the Fire District #1 Volunteer
Program, the annual 2010 program budget of $5,310 will be discontinued.
Attachments
No file(s) attached.
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 06/10/2009 02:57 PM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 06/10/2009 02:59 PM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 06/10/2009 03:02 PM APRV
Form Started By: Tom
Tomberg
Started On: 06/10/2009 12:15
PM
Final Approval Date: 06/10/2009
Packet Page 164 of 393
AM-2337 2.J.
Include the Olympic View Hotel Site on the Edmonds Register of Historic Places
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:06/16/2009
Submitted By:Kernen Lien, Planning Time:Consent
Department:Planning Type:Action
Review Committee:
Committee Action:Approved for Consent Agenda
Information
Subject Title
Ordinance designating the site of the Olympic View Hotel, located at 200 Second Avenue North,
Edmonds, Washington for inclusion on the Edmonds Register of Historic Places, and directing the
Community Services Director or his designee to designate the site on the Official Zoning Map
with an "HR" Designation.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Approved the ordinance (Attachment 1) as recommended by the Edmonds Historic Preservation
Commission.
Previous Council Action
N/A
Narrative
This former site of the Olympic View Hotel is listed on the Washington State Heritage Register
(Attachment 3). The site was nominated for listing on the Edmonds Register of Historic Places in
2006 (Attachment 2). The Edmonds Historic Preservation Commission reviewed the nomination
to place the site on the Edmonds Register and determined the site is eligible for listing pusuant to
ECDC 20.45.020.E (Attachment 4) and have recommended that the site only be listed (Attachment
5). The Harbormaster Homeowners Association (current owners of the site) have given their
consent for the site to be listed on the Edmonds Register (Attachment 6).
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: Ordinance
Link: Nomination form
Link: Washington State Historic Register Information
Link: Historic Preservation Commission Minutes 11-09-2006
Link: Historic Preservation Commission Minutes 05-14-2009
Link: Property owners authorization
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
Packet Page 165 of 393
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 06/11/2009 09:33 AM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 06/11/2009 09:45 AM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 06/11/2009 10:41 AM APRV
Form Started By: Kernen
Lien
Started On: 06/10/2009 05:16
PM
Final Approval Date: 06/11/2009
Packet Page 166 of 393
0006.90000
kpl
ORDINANCE NO. ___
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON, DESIGNATING THE FORMER SITE OF THE
OLYMPIC VIEW HOTEL AT 200 2ND AVE N, EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON FOR INCLUSION ON THE EDMONDS
REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES, DIRECTING THE
COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR OR HIS DESIGNEE TO
DESIGNATE THE SITE ON THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP
WITH AN “HR” DESIGNATION, AND FIXING A TIME
WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE.
WHEREAS, the former site of the Olympic View Hotel at 200 2nd Ave N,
Edmonds, Washington, is currently listed on the Washington Heritage Register; and
WHEREAS, the Chapter 20.45.020(E) of the Edmonds Community Development
Code (ECDC) states that
“Properties listed on the National Register of Historic Places or the
State Register of Historic Places shall be deemed eligible for
listing in the [Edmonds] register without the requirement for
review by the historic preservation commission. Formal listing in
the Edmonds register of historic places shall only require the
owner’s consent and approval by the Edmonds city council;” and
WHEREAS, the owner(s) have given their written consent for such designation;
and
WHEREAS, the City Council has received the recommendation of the Historic
Preservation Commission regarding the features of the site which contribute to its designation
and finds that the application meets the criteria of the ordinance as contained in Chapter 20.45 of
the ECDC, NOW, THEREFORE,
{rwc/00006.900000/} - 1 -
Packet Page 167 of 393
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The former site of the Olympic View Hotel at 200 2nd Ave N,
Edmonds, Washington 98020, is hereby approved for designation to the Edmonds Historic
Register. The site is designated as historically significant, noting that no historic building
currently exists on the property and this designation will not affect any current or future
development of the property.
Section 2. The Community Services Director, or his designee, is hereby
authorized to designate the listed site on the Edmonds zoning map with an “HR” designation.
This designation does not change or modify the underlying zone classification.
Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifi-
cally delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum, and shall take effect
five (5) days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the
title.
APPROVED:
MAYOR GARY HAAKENSON
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED:
CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY:
BY
W. SCOTT SNYDER
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: ________
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: ________
PUBLISHED: ________
{rwc/00006.900000/} - 2 -
Packet Page 168 of 393
EFFECTIVE DATE: ________
ORDINANCE NO. ####
{rwc/00006.900000/} - 3 -
Packet Page 169 of 393
{rwc/00006.900000/} - 4 -
SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. ____
of the City of Edmonds, Washington
On the ___ day of ________, 2009, the City Council of the City of Edmonds,
passed Ordinance No. ____. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting of the title,
provides as follows:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DESIGNATING THE
FORMER SITE OF THE OLYMPIC VIEW HOTEL AT 200 2ND AVE N, EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON FOR INCLUSION ON THE EDMONDS REGISTER OF HISTORIC
PLACES, DIRECTING THE COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR OR HIS DESIGNEE TO
DESIGNATE THE SITE ON THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP WITH AN “HR”
DESIGNATION, AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE.
The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request.
DATED this ___ day of ________, 2009.
CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE
Packet Page 170 of 393
Packet Page 171 of 393
Packet Page 172 of 393
Packet Page 173 of 393
Packet Page 174 of 393
Packet Page 175 of 393
Packet Page 176 of 393
Packet Page 177 of 393
Packet Page 178 of 393
Packet Page 179 of 393
Packet Page 180 of 393
Packet Page 181 of 393
Packet Page 182 of 393
Packet Page 183 of 393
Packet Page 184 of 393
Packet Page 185 of 393
AM-2339 2.K.
Include the Sandy Beach Area of Brackett's Landing North Park on the Edmonds
Register of Historic Places
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:06/16/2009
Submitted By:Kernen Lien, Planning Time:Consent
Department:Planning Type:Action
Review Committee:
Committee Action:
Information
Subject Title
Ordinance designating the sandy beach area of Brackett's Landing North Park, located at 25 West
Main Street, Edmonds, Washington for inclusion on the Edmonds Register of Historic Places, and
directing the Community Services Director or his designee to designate the site on the Official
Zoning Map with an "HR" Designation.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Approve the ordinance (Exhibit 1) as recommended by the Edmonds Historic Preservation
Commission.
Previous Council Action
N/A.
Narrative
The area of Brackett's Landing is listed on the Washington State Heritage Register (Exhibit 3).
Brackett's Landing was nominated for listing on the Edmonds Register of Historic Places in 2006
(Exhibit 2). The Edmonds Historic Preservation Commission reviewed the nomination to place the
site on the Edmonds Register and determined the site is eligible for listing pursuant to ECDC
20.45.020.E (Exhibit 4). Only the sandy beach area of Brackett's Landing North Park is being
nominated for listing on the Edmonds Register of Historic Places.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: Exhibit 1 - Ordinance
Link: Exhibit 2 - Nomination Form
Link: Exhibit 3 - Washington State Historic Register Information
Link: Exhibit 4 - Historic Preservation Commission Minutes 11-09-06
Link: Exhibit 5 - Historic Preservation Commission Minutes 04-09-2009
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 06/11/2009 10:41 AM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 06/11/2009 11:17 AM APRV
Packet Page 186 of 393
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 06/11/2009 11:17 AM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 06/11/2009 11:41 AM APRV
Form Started By: Kernen
Lien
Started On: 06/11/2009 09:54
AM
Final Approval Date: 06/11/2009
Packet Page 187 of 393
0006.90000
kpl
ORDINANCE NO. ___
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON, DESIGNATING THE SANDY BEACH AREA
AT BRACKETT’S LANDING NORTH PARK LOCATED AT
THE FOOT OF MAIN STREET, EDMONDS, WASHINGTON
FOR INCLUSION ON THE EDMONDS REGISTER OF
HISTORIC PLACES, DIRECTING THE COMMUNITY
SERVICES DIRECTOR OR HIS DESIGNEE TO DESIGNATE
THE SITE ON THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP WITH AN “HR”
DESIGNATION, AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME
SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE.
WHEREAS, the beach at Brackett’s Landing North Park located at the foot of
Main Street, Edmonds, Washington, is currently listed on the Washington Heritage Register; and
WHEREAS, the Chapter 20.45.020(E) of the Edmonds Community Development
Code (ECDC) states that
“Properties listed on the National Register of Historic Places or the
State Register of Historic Places shall be deemed eligible for
listing in the [Edmonds] register without the requirement for
review by the historic preservation commission. Formal listing in
the Edmonds register of historic places shall only require the
owner’s consent and approval by the Edmonds city council;” and
WHEREAS, by the adoption of this ordinance the City Council has given their
written consent for such designation; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has received the recommendation of the Historic
Preservation Commission regarding the features of the site which contribute to its designation
and finds that the application meets the criteria of the ordinance as contained in Chapter 20.45 of
the ECDC, NOW, THEREFORE,
{rwc/00006.900000/} - 1 -
Packet Page 188 of 393
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The sandy beach area only at Brackett’s Landing North Park located
at the foot of Main Street, Edmonds, Washington, 98020, is hereby approved for designation to
the Edmonds Historic Register. The exclusive and continued use of the property as a natural
recreation beach is hereby designated as significant, noting that normal operation of the property
as a beach is not an activity requiring review by the Edmonds Historic Preservation Commission.
Section 2. The Community Services Director, or his designee, is hereby
authorized to designate the listed site on the Edmonds zoning map with an “HR” designation.
This designation does not change or modify the underlying zone classification.
Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifi-
cally delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum, and shall take effect
five (5) days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the
title.
APPROVED:
MAYOR GARY HAAKENSON
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED:
CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY:
BY
W. SCOTT SNYDER
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: ________
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: ________
PUBLISHED: ________
{rwc/00006.900000/} - 2 -
Packet Page 189 of 393
EFFECTIVE DATE: ________
ORDINANCE NO. ####
{rwc/00006.900000/} - 3 -
Packet Page 190 of 393
{rwc/00006.900000/} - 4 -
SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. ____
of the City of Edmonds, Washington
On the ___ day of ________, 2009, the City Council of the City of Edmonds,
passed Ordinance No. ____. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting of the title,
provides as follows:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DESIGNATING THE
SANDY BEACH AREA AT BRACKETT’S LANDING NORTH PARK LOCATED AT THE
FOOT OF MAIN STREET, EDMONDS, WASHINGTON FOR INCLUSION ON THE
EDMONDS REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES, DIRECTING THE COMMUNITY
SERVICES DIRECTOR OR HIS DESIGNEE TO DESIGNATE THE SITE ON THE
OFFICIAL ZONING MAP WITH AN “HR” DESIGNATION, AND FIXING A TIME WHEN
THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE.
The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request.
DATED this ___ day of ________, 2009.
CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE
Packet Page 191 of 393
Packet Page 192 of 393
Packet Page 193 of 393
Packet Page 194 of 393
Packet Page 195 of 393
Packet Page 196 of 393
Packet Page 197 of 393
Packet Page 198 of 393
Packet Page 199 of 393
Packet Page 200 of 393
Packet Page 201 of 393
Packet Page 202 of 393
Packet Page 203 of 393
Packet Page 204 of 393
Packet Page 205 of 393
Packet Page 206 of 393
Packet Page 207 of 393
AM-2338 2.L.
Include the Edmonds Memorial Cemetery Site on the Edmonds Register of Historic
Places
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:06/16/2009
Submitted By:Kernen Lien, Planning Time:Consent
Department:Planning Type:Action
Review Committee:
Committee Action:
Information
Subject Title
Ordinance designating the Edmonds Memorial Cemetery, located at 820 15th Street SW,
Edmonds, Washington for inclusion on the Edmonds Register of Historic Places, and directing the
Community Services Director or his designee to designate the site on the Official Zoning Map
with an "HR" Designation.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Approve the ordinance (Exhibit 1) as recommended by the Edmonds Historic Preservation
Commission.
Previous Council Action
N/A
Narrative
The Edmonds Memorial Cemetery is listed on the Washington State Heritage Register (Exhibit 3).
The Cemetery was nominated for listing on the Edmonds Register of Historic Places in 2006
(Exhibit 2). The Edmonds Historic Preservation Commission reviewed the nomination to place the
site on the Edmonds Register and determined the site is eligible for listing pursuant to ECDC
20.45.020.E (Exhibit 4). The Edmonds Memorial Cemetery Board has submitted a letter in favor
of listing the Cemetery on the Edmonds Register of Historic Places (Exhibit 6).
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: Exhibit 1 - Ordinance
Link: Exhibit 2 - Nomination form
Link: Exhibit 3 - Washington State Historic Register Information
Link: Exhibit 4 - Historic Preservation Commission Minutes 11-09-2006
Link: Exhibit 5 - Historic Preservation Commission Minutes 04-09-2009
Link: Exhibit 6 - Edmonds Memorial Cemetery Board Letter 05-27-2009
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
Packet Page 208 of 393
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 06/11/2009 10:40 AM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 06/11/2009 11:17 AM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 06/11/2009 11:41 AM APRV
Form Started By: Kernen
Lien
Started On: 06/11/2009 09:17
AM
Final Approval Date: 06/11/2009
Packet Page 209 of 393
0006.90000
kpl
ORDINANCE NO. ___
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON, DESIGNATING THE EDMONDS
MEMORIAL CEMETERY AT 820 15TH STREET SW,
EDMONDS, WASHINGTON FOR INCLUSION ON THE
EDMONDS REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES, DIRECTING
THE COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR OR HIS
DESIGNEE TO DESIGNATE THE SITE ON THE OFFICIAL
ZONING MAP WITH AN “HR” DESIGNATION, AND FIXING
A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE.
WHEREAS, the Edmonds Memorial Cemetery at 820 15th Street SW, Edmonds,
Washington, is currently listed on the Washington Heritage Register; and
WHEREAS, the Chapter 20.45.020(E) of the Edmonds Community Development
Code (ECDC) states that
“Properties listed on the National Register of Historic Places or the
State Register of Historic Places shall be deemed eligible for
listing in the [Edmonds] register without the requirement for
review by the historic preservation commission. Formal listing in
the Edmonds register of historic places shall only require the
owner’s consent and approval by the Edmonds city council;” and
WHEREAS, The Edmonds Memorial Cemetery Board has reviewed the proposal
and has approved of the designation; and
WHEREAS, by the adoption of this ordinance the City Council has given their
written consent for such designation; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has received the recommendation of the Historic
Preservation Commission regarding the features of the site which contribute to its designation
{rwc/00006.900000/} - 1 -
Packet Page 210 of 393
and finds that the application meets the criteria of the ordinance as contained in Chapter 20.45 of
the ECDC, NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Edmonds Memorial Cemetery at 820 15th Street SW, Edmonds,
Washington 98020, is hereby approved for designation to the Edmonds Historic Register. The
exclusive and continued use of the property as a cemetery is hereby designated as significant,
noting that normal operation of the property as a cemetery is not an activity requiring review by
the Edmonds Historic Preservation Commission.
Section 2. The Community Services Director, or his designee, is hereby
authorized to designate the listed site on the Edmonds zoning map with an “HR” designation.
This designation does not change or modify the underlying zone classification.
Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifi-
cally delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum, and shall take effect
five (5) days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the
title.
APPROVED:
MAYOR GARY HAAKENSON
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED:
CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY:
BY
W. SCOTT SNYDER
{rwc/00006.900000/} - 2 -
Packet Page 211 of 393
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: ________
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: ________
PUBLISHED: ________
EFFECTIVE DATE: ________
ORDINANCE NO. ####
{rwc/00006.900000/} - 3 -
Packet Page 212 of 393
{rwc/00006.900000/} - 4 -
SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. ____
of the City of Edmonds, Washington
On the ___ day of ________, 2009, the City Council of the City of Edmonds,
passed Ordinance No. ____. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting of the title,
provides as follows:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DESIGNATING THE
EDMONDS MEMORIAL CEMETERY AT 820 15TH STREET SW, EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON FOR INCLUSION ON THE EDMONDS REGISTER OF HISTORIC
PLACES, DIRECTING THE COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR OR HIS DESIGNEE TO
DESIGNATE THE SITE ON THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP WITH AN “HR”
DESIGNATION, AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE.
The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request.
DATED this ___ day of ________, 2009.
CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE
Packet Page 213 of 393
Packet Page 214 of 393
Packet Page 215 of 393
Packet Page 216 of 393
Packet Page 217 of 393
Packet Page 218 of 393
Packet Page 219 of 393
Packet Page 220 of 393
Packet Page 221 of 393
Packet Page 222 of 393
Packet Page 223 of 393
Packet Page 224 of 393
Packet Page 225 of 393
Packet Page 226 of 393
Packet Page 227 of 393
Packet Page 228 of 393
Packet Page 229 of 393
Packet Page 230 of 393
Packet Page 231 of 393
Packet Page 232 of 393
AM-2311 2.M.
Building Board of Appeals
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:06/16/2009
Submitted By:Ann Bullis, Building Time:Consent
Department:Building Type:Action
Review Committee:
Committee Action:
Information
Subject Title
Ordinance amending ECDC Chapter 19.80 Board of Appeals adding new section 19.80.023 and
repealing ECC Chapter 10.15 Building Board of Appeals.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Adopt proposed Ordinance.
Previous Council Action
None
Narrative
The proposed ordinance is before you to eliminate some inconsistencies found in the code and to
reestablish previously approved code language that was inadvertently dropped during adoption of
ECDC Chapter 19.80 several years ago.
Discussion regarding ECDC section 19.80.023:
ECDC Chapter 19.80 was established during the code adoption process of the 2003 International
Building and Residential Codes. During recent staff review of ECDC 19.80 Board of Appeals, it
was found that code language in a previous ordinance, allowing the Hearing Examiner to hear
appeals of decisions by the Building Official when a Board of Appeals could not convene, was
inadvertently omitted with the adoption of ECDC 19.80. This proposed ordinance reestablishes
that code language.
Staff has tried several times over the years to establish a Board of Appeals, however unfortunately
each time there have been too few applicants, and many were not qualified.
Because other jurisdictions within Snohomish County also use a Hearing Examiner for their
Board of Appeals, Edmonds took the lead on trying to establish a Snohomish County Regional
Board of Appeals. There was lack of interest by many of the jurisdictions due to the small number
of appeals of Building Official decisions. For example for Edmonds, in the past 10 years there
have only been 2 appeals.
The proposed amendment allows the Hearing Examiner to hear appeals of decisions by the
Building Official anytime the Board of Appeals is unable to convene, including due to lack of
membership.
Packet Page 233 of 393
Discussion regarding proposed repeal of ECC Chapter 10.15:
With the adoption of ECDC 19.80 Board of Appeals, ECC Chapter 10.15 Building Board of
Appeals is now out of date, conflicts with current ECDC Chapter 19.80 and should be repealed.
We recommend that you adopt the proposed ordinance.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: v:\My Documents\Board of Appeals\Board of Appeals ORD.DOC
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 06/08/2009 08:50 AM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 06/08/2009 09:51 AM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 06/10/2009 03:02 PM APRV
Form Started By: Ann
Bullis
Started On: 06/01/2009 07:55
AM
Final Approval Date: 06/10/2009
Packet Page 234 of 393
0006.90000
BFP
5/20/09
ORDINANCE NO. _______
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON, ADOPTING A NEW ECC 19.80.023 TO
AUTHORIZE THE HEARING EXAMINER TO DECIDE
BUILDING CODE APPEALS WHENEVER THE BOARD OF
APPEALS IS UNABLE TO CONVENE; REPEALING
DUPLICATE AND CONFLICTING PROVISIONS RELATING
TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS IN CHAPTER 10.15 ECC;
PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND FIXING A TIME
WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE.
WHEREAS, appeals before the Board of Appeals (“Board”) are very rare; and
WHEREAS, there have been occasions when appeals have been brought before
the Board, but the Board was unable to convene due to lack of membership; and
WHEREAS, RCW 35A.63.170 authorizes the City Council to vest in the hearing
examiner the power to hear and decide those issues it believes should be reviewed and decided
by the hearing examiner; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the hearing examiner should hear and
decide appeals relating to the building code whenever the Board is unable to convene; and
WHEREAS, both Chapters 10.15 ECC and 19.80 ECDC relate to the creation,
membership and authority of the Board; and
WHEREAS, provisions of Chapters 10.15 ECC and 19.80 ECDC are either in
conflict or duplicative; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO
ORDAIN AS FOLLOW:
{BFP729283.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 1 -
Packet Page 235 of 393
{BFP729283.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 2 -
Section 1. Adopted. A new ECDC 19.80.023 entitled Alternate to Board of
Appeals is hereby adopted to read as follows:
19.80.023 Alternate to Board of Appeals.
Whenever it appears to the building official that an appeal covered
under this Chapter may be unreasonably delayed because the
Board of Appeals is unable to convene to hear and decide the
appeal in a timely manner, the appeal shall be brought instead
before the hearing examiner, who shall have the same power and
duties to hear and decide the appeal as the Board of Appeals under
this Chapter. All aspects and requirements for the appeal shall
remain unchanged. The building official’s decision and reasons to
shift the appeal from the Board of Appeals to the hearing examiner
shall be provided timely to appellant and all interested parties in
writing.
Section 2. Adopted. A new ECC 10.15.000 entitled Board of Appeals -
Regulations is hereby adopted to read as follows:
10.15.000 Board of Appeals - Regulations.
Regulations relating to the Board of Appeals shall be as set forth in
Chapter 19.80 ECDC.
Section 3. Repealed. The following sections of Chapter 10.15 ECC are hereby
repealed: ECC 10.15.010 (Purpose), ECC 10.15.020 (Membership), ECC 10.15.030 (Removal),
ECC 10.15.040 (Limitations of authority), ECC 10.15.050 (Tests), and ECC 10.15.060
(Landslide hazard and earth subsidence areas).
Section 4. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this
ordinance should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction,
such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other
section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance.
Packet Page 236 of 393
Section 5. Effective Date. This ordinance is not subject to referendum, and shall
take effect five (5) days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting
of the title.
APPROVED:
MAYOR GARY HAAKENSON
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED:
CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY:
BY
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
PUBLISHED:
EFFECTIVE DATE:
ORDINANCE NO.
{BFP729283.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 3 -
Packet Page 237 of 393
{BFP729283.DOC;1/00006.900000/}- 4 -
SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. __________
of the City of Edmonds, Washington
On the ____ day of ___________, 2009, the City Council of the City of Edmonds,
passed Ordinance No. _____________. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting
of the title, provides as follows:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING A NEW
ECC 19.80.023 TO AUTHORIZE THE HEARING EXAMINER TO DECIDE BUILDING
CODE APPEALS WHENEVER THE BOARD OF APPEALS IS UNABLE TO CONVENE;
REPEALING DUPLICATE AND CONFLICTING PROVISIONS RELATING TO THE
BOARD OF APPEALS IN CHAPTER 10.15 ECC; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND
FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE.
The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request.
DATED this _____ day of ________________, 2009.
CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE
Packet Page 238 of 393
AM-2344 2.N.
Clarify Nuisance and Property Performance Codes
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:06/16/2009
Submitted By:Sandy Chase, City Clerk's Office
Submitted For:Rob Chave and Mike Thies Time:Consent
Department:City Clerk's Office Type:Action
Review Committee:Community/Development Services
Committee Action:Approved for Consent Agenda
Information
Subject Title
Ordinance amending the provisions of ECC 6.20.040 to clarify where junk vehicles may be
stored; ECDC 17.60.040 Vehicles in Residential Zones, Subsections (A) and (B) to clarify several
scrivener's errors.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the ordinance.
Previous Council Action
City Council adopted Ordinance No. 3720, Public Nuisance Abatement, on December 16, 2008,
and Ordinance No. 3731, Property Performance Standards, on March 24, 2009.
The Community Services/Development Services Committee reviewed the proposed ordinance
correcting scrivener errors and clarifying inconsistencies on June 9, 2009 and recommended
approval on the Consent Agenda.
Narrative
Ordinance Nos. 3720 and 3731 were considered and adopted separately by City Council.
The proposed ordinance (Exhibit 1) corrects several scrivener's errors and clarifies inconsistencies
where they have been noted. For reference, Exhibit 2, shows the changes being made in
underline/strikeline format.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: Exhibit 1 - Draft Ordinance
Link: Exhibit 2 - Code text changes
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 06/12/2009 08:56 AM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 06/12/2009 09:52 AM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 06/12/2009 10:19 AM APRV
Packet Page 239 of 393
Form Started By: Sandy
Chase
Started On: 06/12/2009 08:37
AM
Final Approval Date: 06/12/2009
Packet Page 240 of 393
{WSS725475.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 1 -
0006.90000
WSS/gjz
4/13/09
R:4/23/09gjz
ORDINANCE NO. _______
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE PROVISIONS OF ECC
6.20.040 TO CLARIFY WHERE JUNK VEHICLES MAY BE
STORED; ECDC 17.60.040 VEHICLES IN RESIDENTIAL
ZONES, SUBSECTIONS (A) AND (B) TO CLARIFY SEVERAL
SCRIVENER’S ERRORS, AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE
SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE.
WHEREAS, Edmonds Community Development Code Chapter 17.60 establishes
performance standards regarding the use of property within the City’s zoning district; and
WHEREAS, Chapter 6.20 deals with nuisances, and
WHEREAS, extensive public process has been conducted regarding the changes
before the Edmonds Planning Board and the Edmonds City Council; and
WHEREAS, some clarification is needed in order to coordinate the provisions of
the Chapter given changes in various processes, NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Section 6.20.040 Aesthetic Nuisances, subsection (D) is hereby
amended to read as follows:
6.20.041 Aesthetic nuisances.
The following nuisances are aesthetic in nature and can negatively
impact neighborhood property values and foster blight. The
following actions and/or conditions shall be a public nuisance
when located in any front, side or rear yard or vacant lot:
A. Any junk, trash, or litter.
Packet Page 241 of 393
{WSS725475.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 2 -
B. Salvage materials or lumber not neatly stacked.
C. Any broken, soiled or discarded furniture, household
equipment or furnishings.
D. Any junk vehicle, vehicle parts or other articles of personal
property which are stored, discarded or left in a state of partial
construction or repair.
E. Any accumulation, stack or pile of building, landscaping or
construction materials which are exposed to the elements or are in
disarray and which are not directly associated with a project on the
premises for which a current building permit has been obtained; or,
with respect to a project which does not require a permit, that is in
progress or which is scheduled to begin within 10 business days.
Construction materials include but are not limited to metal, wood,
wire, drywall, electrical components, and any supplies, equipment
or other items utilized for painting, landscaping, logging, roofing,
masonry or plumbing.
F. Any shopping carts, except where such shopping carts are
owned and/or utilized for their designated purpose upon the
underlying premises.
G. Exceptions. The nuisances enumerated in subsections (A)
through (D) of this section shall not apply to items or materials
when:
1. Wholly enclosed within a building; or
2. Located in a rear yard and screened from adjacent
properties and the public right-of-way by a five-foot opaque fence
or by a vegetative barrier that is between five feet and eight feet in
height and provides a visual barrier equivalent to an opaque fence.
Corner lots and Flag lots which have no rear yard may establish a
screening area which qualifies for this exemption in a side yard.
Section 2. Section 17.60.040 Vehicles in residential zones, subsections (A) and
(B) are hereby amended to correct scrivener’s errors:
17.60.040 Vehicles in residential zones
A. No more than five motor vehicles shall be parked on a
residential lot. Each motor vehicle must be currently licensed and
operable.
Packet Page 242 of 393
{WSS725475.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 3 -
1. Exemptions.
a. If more than five licensed drivers reside at the same
address, an additional motor vehicle for each licensed driver over
five may be parked at that particular address; however, each
licensed driver must have that particular address on his or her
license.
b. This regulation does not apply to:
i. Motor vehicles when parked in a rear yard
and screened from adjacent properties and the public right-of-way
by a five-foot opaque fence or by a vegetative barrier that is
between five feet and eight feet in height and provides a visual
barrier equivalent to an opaque fence. Corner lots and Flag lots
which have no rear yard may establish a screening area which
qualifies for this exemption in a side yard.
ii. Temporary parking for a duration not to
exceed seventy-two hours;
iii. Apartment or other complex with an
approved building and parking plan;
iv. Permitted construction areas; or
v. Motorcycles or mopeds.
B. No more than two recreational vehicles of any kind may be
parked outside an approved enclosed structure anywhere on a
property. If the recreational vehicle cannot be stored as described
in 17.60.040(D) due to site constraints, the recreational vehicle
shall be parked off-site during those extended times when not in
use. Only one side yard may be used for storage of recreational
vehicles. For the purposes of this chapter, “recreational vehicle”
means a vehicular-type unit primarily designed for recreational
camping or travel use that has its own motive power or is mounted
on or towed by another vehicle. The units include travel trailers,
fifth-wheel trailers, folding camping trailers, truck campers, and
motor homes.
. . .
Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifi-
cally delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum, and shall take effect
Packet Page 243 of 393
{WSS725475.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 4 -
five (5) days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the
title.
APPROVED:
MAYOR GARY HAAKENSON
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED:
CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY:
BY
W. SCOTT SNYDER
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
PUBLISHED:
EFFECTIVE DATE:
ORDINANCE NO.
Packet Page 244 of 393
{WSS725475.DOC;1/00006.900000/}- 5 -
SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. __________
of the City of Edmonds, Washington
On the ____ day of ___________, 2009, the City Council of the City of Edmonds,
passed Ordinance No. _____________. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting
of the title, provides as follows:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE
PROVISIONS OF ECC 6.20.040 TO CLARIFY WHERE JUNK VEHICLES MAY BE
STORED; ECDC 17.60.040 VEHICLES IN RESIDENTIAL ZONES, SUBSECTIONS (A)
AND (B) TO CLARIFY SEVERAL SCRIVENER’S ERRORS, AND FIXING A TIME WHEN
THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE.
The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request.
DATED this _____ day of ________________, 2009.
CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE
Packet Page 245 of 393
June 9, 2009
Ordinance amending 6.20.040 to clarify where junk vehicles may be stored and 17.60.040, subsections (A)
and (B) to clarify several scrivener’s errors.
Current Language (Changes in underline and strikethrough)
6.20.041 Aesthetic nuisances.
The following nuisances are aesthetic in nature and can negatively impact neighborhood property values
and foster blight. The following actions and/or conditions shall be a public nuisance when located in any
front, side or rear yard or vacant lot.
A. Any junk, trash, or litter,
B. Salvage materials or lumber not neatly stacked.
C. Any broken, soiled or discarded furniture, household equipment or furnishings.
D. Any junk vehicle, vehicle parts or other articles of personal property which are stored, discarded
or left in a state of partial construction or repair.
E. Any accumulation, stack or pile of building, landscaping or construction materials which are
exposed to the elements or are in disarray and which are not directly associated with a project on the
premises for which a current building permit has been obtained; or, with respect to a project which does not
require a permit, that is in progress or which is scheduled to begin within ten (10) business days.
Construction materials include but are not limited to metal, wood, wire, drywall, electrical components, and
any supplies, equipment or other items utilized for painting, landscaping, logging, roofing, masonry or
plumbing.
F. Any shopping carts, except where such shopping carts are owned and/or utilized for their
designated purpose upon the underling premises.
G. Exceptions. The nuisances enumerated in subparagraphs A through D shall not apply to items or
materials when:
1. Wholly enclosed within a building; or
2. Located in a rear yard and screened from adjacent properties and the public right of way
by a five six-foot opaque fence or by a vegetative barrier that is between five six feet and eight feet in
height and provides a visual barrier equivalent to an opaque fence. Corner lots which have no rear yard
may establish a screening area which qualifies for this exception in a side yard.
Packet Page 246 of 393
Current Language (changes in underline and strikethrough)
17.60.040 Vehicles in residential zones
A. No more than five motor vehicles shall be parked on a residential
lot. Each motor vehicle must be currently licensed and operable.
1. Exemptions.
a. If more than five licensed drivers reside at the same
address, an additional motor vehicle for each licensed driver over five
may be parked at that particular address; however, each licensed driver
must have that particular address on his or her license.
b. This regulation does not apply to:
i. Motor vehicles when parked in a rear yard
and screened from adjacent properties and the public right-of-way by a
five-foot opaque fence or by a vegetative barrier that is between five
feet and eight feet in height and provides a visual barrier equivalent to
an opaque fence. Corner lots and Flag lots which have no rear yard
may establish a screening area which qualifies for this exemption in a
side yard. Motor vehicles parked in the front yard or inside of a
lawfully permitted and constructed building or screened behind a solid
fence or vegetative barrier at least five feet in height;
ii. Temporary parking for a duration not to
exceed seventy-two hours;
iii. Apartment or other complex with an
approved building and parking plan;
iv. Permitted construction areas; or
v. Motorcycles or mopeds.
B. No more than two recreational vehicles of any kind may be parked
outside an approved enclosed structure anywhere on a property. If the
recreational vehicle cannot be stored as described in 17.60.040(D), or
in a yard or the rear yard due to site constraints, the recreational vehicle
shall be parked off-site during those extended times when not in use.
Only one side yard may be used for storage of recreational vehicles.
For the purposes of this chapter, “recreational vehicle” means a
vehicular-type unit primarily designed for recreational camping or
travel use that has its own motive power or is mounted on or towed by
another vehicle. The units include travel trailers, fifth-wheel trailers,
folding camping trailers, truck campers, and motor homes.
Packet Page 247 of 393
AM-2332 3.
Continued Public Hearing on Utility Rate and Water Tax Increase
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:06/16/2009
Submitted By:Kim Karas, Public Works
Submitted For:Noel Miller Time:30 Minutes
Department:Public Works Type:Action
Review Committee:Finance
Committee Action:Recommend Review by Full Council
Information
Subject Title
Continued public hearing on utility rate and water tax increase.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Adopt Ordinance No. ____ which increases the water and stormwater utility rates for 2009. In
addition, as part of the ordinance, increase the water utility tax rate to pay for the cost of City fire
hydrants.
Previous Council Action
A public hearing was held on June 2, 2009 in regard to utility rate increases for water, stormwater
and a water utility tax increase for fire hydrants.
Narrative
This is a continuation of a public hearing in regard to an increase of the water and stormwater
utility rates as well as a water utility tax increase.
The overall increase for water rates, including an 8.7% tax increase on water sales is 16.8%. The
increase for stormwater is 6.82%. The overall cost increase to a typical single family household for
water, sewer, stormwater and fire hydrant services is 7.65%. The average annual utility bill
increase for 2007-2009 including taxes is 4.3%. The estimated monthly impact to an average
residential customer is $4.64. Also, the City has a low income/senior discount program. With the
proposed rate increases, the City of Edmonds utility rates will be approximately 20% below the
state average municipal utility rate.
Factors that necessitate a rate increase for water are:
• Alderwood Water's wholesale rate increases as a result of improvements to the City of Everett’s
regional water treatment facility along with the replacement of regional water transmission lines;
• The on-going need to replace aging and leaky City of Edmonds’ water mains and compliance
with State water loss reduction mandates;
• A gradual decrease in water consumption due to conservation mandates which, in turn, reduces
water revenues; and
Packet Page 248 of 393
• Lack of low interest loan and grant programs through the Public Works Trust Fund and State
Revolving Fund.
The primary factors necessitating a stormwater rate increase of 6.82% for the remainder of 2009
are:
• The need for additional capital projects to replace aging or inadequate infrastructure and to
address flooding damage from recent severe storm events;
• On-going compliance with the Federal Clean Water Act as regulated by the State Stormwater
NPDES permit; and
• Lack of funding for Federal and State low interest loan and grant programs.
Attached is a question and answer summary to the public comments that were received at the
previous public hearing. Also in response to public comment, the 2008 utility rate study along
with supporting documents have been made available to the public since Friday, June 5th on the
front page of the City of Edmonds website.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: 2009 Utility Rate and Tax Increase Q & A
Link: Edmonds Water Utility Data Summary
Link: Water & Stormwater Capital Improvement Program 2008-2014
Link: Water System Capital Improvements map 2008-2010
Link: Utility Rate and Tax Increase Ordinance
Link: Estimated Impact
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 06/11/2009 12:29 PM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 06/11/2009 01:02 PM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 06/11/2009 01:40 PM APRV
Form Started By: Kim
Karas
Started On: 06/10/2009 02:13
PM
Final Approval Date: 06/11/2009
Packet Page 249 of 393
Packet Page 250 of 393
Packet Page 251 of 393
Packet Page 252 of 393
Packet Page 253 of 393
Packet Page 254 of 393
Packet Page 255 of 393
Packet Page 256 of 393
P
a
c
k
e
t
P
a
g
e
2
5
7
o
f
3
9
3
Packet Page 258 of 393
Packet Page 259 of 393
Packet Page 260 of 393
Packet Page 261 of 393
Packet Page 262 of 393
Packet Page 263 of 393
AM-2343 4.
Temporary Uses and Buildings
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:06/16/2009
Submitted By:Rob Chave, Planning Time:20 Minutes
Department:Planning Type:Action
Review Committee:Community/Development Services
Committee Action:Recommend Review by Full Council
Information
Subject Title
Public hearing on a proposed Ordinance amending the provisions of Edmonds Community
Development Code Chapter 17.50 Temporary Uses and Chapter 19.05.010 Work Exempt
from Permit, regulating temporary uses and buildings.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Adopt one of the proposed ordinances (either Exhibit 1 or Exhibit 2):
Exhibit 1 was approved on March 3, 2009, and provides for a 120-sq.ft. threshold;
Exhibit 2 provides for a 200-sq.ft. threshold.
Previous Council Action
City Council held a public hearing on the amendment on March 3, 2009. The draft ordinance was
referred to the Community Services/Development Services Committee on March 17, 2009. The
Committee reviewed and referred the draft ordinance back to the full Council, and a new public
hearing date was set.
Narrative
On March 3, 2009, Council voted to approve an amendment to Chapter 17.70 of the Edmonds
Community Development Code (ECDC) addressing temporary buildings and uses. On March 17,
2009, Council remanded the ordinance back to Council Committee for further discussion.
Staff was asked to look at increasing the allowable floor area of tents and canopies in section
17.70.030A of the proposed ordinance from 120 square feet to 200 square feet. As discussed at
the Committee, this proposal also requires an amendment to the residential building code to
increase the square footage of exempt accessory structures from 120 square feet to 200 square
feet; the draft changes to Chapter 19.05 would exempt fabric canopy structures included in the
proposed Temporary Use ordinance from the requirement to obtain a building permit.
Pursuant to RCW 19.27.060, amendments to the building code by local jurisdictions “…shall not
result in a code that is less than the minimum performance standards and objectives contained in
the state building code.” The proposed amendments meet this requirement. In other words,
choosing whether to go with a 120- vs. 200-square-foot threshold is a policy decision by Council.
Packet Page 264 of 393
Part of the discussion at the Committee involved the relationship between the size threshold for
these structures and other rules that come into play, especially zoning setbacks. It was pointed out
that regardless of size, the location of these items frequently runs afoul of zoning setback
requirements. If the size of structures exempt from a building permit is increased, it is likely that
more of these larger structures will be placed in setbacks, potentially resulting in more expense
and frustration in code violation cases. For discussion purposes, attached are examples of various
types of canopy structures (see Exhibit 4).
The CS/DS Committee reviewed the potential changes to the draft ordinance amending Chapter
17.70, as well as an amendment to ECDC 19.05.010 covering "Work Exempt from Permit" for
building permits. The action by the CS/DS Committee was for staff to bring the proposed
ordinances back to Council for discussion.
The Council has a couple of options. Council can adopt the ordinance as approved on March 3,
2009, and prepared for adoption on March 17, 2009 (Exhibit 1) before it was referred to the
Committee. Alternatively, Council can change the threshold from 120 to 200 square feet by
adopting the ordinances contained in Exhibit 2.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: Exhibit 1: March 17th Ordinance
Link: Exhibit 2: Ordinances reviewed by CS/DS Committee
Link: Exhibit 3: City Council minutes
Link: Exhibit 4: Examples
Link: Exhibit 5: Staff presentation from 4/28/2009
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 06/11/2009 03:48 PM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 06/12/2009 09:52 AM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 06/12/2009 10:19 AM APRV
Form Started By: Rob
Chave
Started On: 06/11/2009 02:39
PM
Final Approval Date: 06/12/2009
Packet Page 265 of 393
0006.90000
WSS/gjz
3/4/09
ORDINANCE NO. _______
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE PROVISIONS OF THE
EDMONDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE CHAPTER
17.70 TEMPORARY USES, AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE
SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE.
WHEREAS, temporary structures in excess of 120 feet of floor space are limited
and regulated by the International Building Code but not addressed by the temporary use
provisions of Chapter 17.70; and
WHEREAS, the City Council deems it to be in the public interest to address the
issue of cargo and other temporary storage containers, and
WHEREAS, the existing temporary conditional use permit process may result in
costs in excess of the storage container or security unit to be utilized; and
WHEREAS, these issues were considered at public hearings before the Edmonds
Planning Board resulting in a recommendation for adoption of certain provisions as contained
here in this ordinance; and
WHEREAS, the City Council Community Services and Development Services
Committee have reviewed the recommendations; and
WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on this matter on March 3,
2009; and
WHEREAS, the City Council deems it to be in the public interest to amend
Chapter 17.70 regarding temporary uses in order to extend the time in which temporary uses may
{WSS721634.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 1 -
Packet Page 266 of 393
be maintained, create an administrative, less expensive process to consider such uses, clarify the
definitions and application of temporary use provisions to storage units, tents, canopies and other
temporary structures, NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1.
Chapter 17.70
TEMPORARY USES
Sections:
17.70.000 Security units.
17.70.005 Project sales offices/sales models.
17.70.010 Other temporary buildings.
17.70.020 Temporary parking lots.
17.70.030 Temporary municipal office uses.
17.70.035 Temporary storage units.
17.70.040 Bistro and outdoor dining.
17.70.000 Security units.
A. Definition. A security unit is a building, mobile home, trailer,
or vehicle used temporarily in connection with providing security
during construction of a structure or building for which a valid
building permit has been issued.
B. Conditions. A security unit is permitted in all zones under the
following conditions:
1. All sanitation facilities and safety measures shall be approved in
advance by the building official, health official and other
appropriate city officials.
2. Unless earlier directed by the building official pursuant to
subsection (B)(3) of this section, security units in the following
zones shall be removed after the following time periods:
a. In an RS zone, one year;
b. All other zones, one year, with a one-year extension if the
community development director finds that the project is large
{WSS721634.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 2 -
Packet Page 267 of 393
enough to require the longer period, disregarding any self-imposed
delay.
3. The building official may order the removal of a security unit if
any of the following situations occur:
a. The building permit expires or is cancelled.
b. The building official issues an occupancy permit.
c. The building official determines that the security structure is no
longer needed to provide protection against theft or vandalism.
17.70.005 Project sales offices/sales models.
A. Definition. A project sales office or sales model is space within
an otherwise permitted building used temporarily to support the
sale of multifamily or condominium units.
B. Conditions. A project sales office or sales model is only
permitted to occur on the property containing the project or unit(s)
being offered for sale. The sales office or sales model shall be
discontinued and removed prior to occupancy of the last unit
available for sale on the property.
C. The granting of a permit for a sales office or sales model shall
be reviewed and processed in accordance with the requirements of
ECDC 20.95.040, Staff decision – No notice required.
17.70.010 Other temporary buildings.
Except as provided below in ECDC 17.70.030, a conditional use
permit shall be required to construct a temporary building in any
zone. The permit shall be administratively reviewed by staff and
shall be valid for a period of one year; provided however, that said
permit may be extended by the development services director for a
single one-year extension upon submittal of a written application
prior to the expiration of the original permit. All the requirements
of the zoning district shall be met. An appeal of the staff decision
granting or denying such a permit or extension shall be reviewed
by the hearing examiner in accordance with the requirements for
any other conditional use permit under ECDC 20.100.010, with the
decision being appealable to the city council under the procedures
applicable to any other conditional use permit.
{WSS721634.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 3 -
Packet Page 268 of 393
17.70.020 Temporary parking lots.
See ECDC 17.50.090, which by this reference is incorporated
herein as if set forth in full.
17.70.030 Temporary municipal office uses.
The city council may, at its sole discretion, approve the installation
of a temporary building or mobile office structure to house
municipal office and related storage in conjunction with or in
anticipation of the construction or remodeling of a municipal
facility. Such structure shall be exempt from any other
requirements of the zoning code and the decision of the city
council shall be final. The city staff is hereby directed to provide
for reasonable landscaping and screening of such structure and
sufficient drawings and site plans to adequately inform the council
of the nature and proposed use of the structure, its design and the
anticipated length of time which the structure will be in use. In no
event shall the use of such a temporary structure exceed three years
without the specific authorization of the city council.
17.70.035 Temporary storage units
Defined:
A “Canopy” means a structure, enclosure or shelter constructed of
fabric or pliable materials supported by any manner, except by air
or the contents it protects, and is open without sidewalls or drops
on 75 percent or more of the perimeter.
B. “Cargo or shipping Container” means a standardized, container
designed without an axle or wheels, which was originally,
specifically, or formerly designed for or used in the packing,
shipping, movement or transportation of freight, articles, goods or
commodities.
C. “Tent” means a structure, enclosure or shelter constructed of
fabric or other pliable material supported by any manner except by
air or the contents that it protects.
Cargo or shipping containers. No person shall place or cause to be
placed any cargo or shipping container, regardless of structural
modifications, on any area or any property in a residentially zoned
district that is not subject to the design review process. Property or
projects subject to the design review process may apply for this use
per ECDC 20.10.010. Administrative waivers shall not apply.
{WSS721634.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 4 -
Packet Page 269 of 393
The temporary placement of a portable storage container on a
residentially zoned lot for the purpose of loading and unloading
household contents shall be permitted for a period of time not
exceeding thirty (30) days in a calendar year.
Tents, tarps and canopy structures which use plastic sheeting,
canvas, or other similar pliable materials to cover storage areas,
and/or to be used as garages or carports are regulated in residential
zones:
A. Tents or canopies with a floor area measured to the exterior
wall or post exceeding120 square feet are prohibited, except for
those used for limited time period for a special event such as a
party or wedding not to exceed twenty-four (24) hours.
B. Tents and canopies shall comply with setback and height
requirements for accessory structures for the zone. Lot coverage
requirements also apply.
If a tent or canopy is located within 6 feet of another tent(s) or
canopy(s) or attached in any way, they shall be considered as one
(1) tent or canopy and shall be subject to the provisions of J.3.a
and J.3.b for combined floor area and location.
D. Temporary storage units do not require a conditional use
permit.
17.70.040 Bistro and outdoor dining.
A properly zoned and licensed food or beverage service
establishment may temporarily utilize public sidewalks in right-of-
way areas immediately adjacent to its establishment. The area
authorized for use shall be that area of the immediately adjacent
public right-of-way and/or outdoor areas under the lease or
ownership of the applicant lying between the applicant's property
and the public right-of-way. The area authorized for such use shall
not extend beyond the street frontage of the business lessee or
property owner. Any building or structure as such terms are
defined pursuant to the building code adopted by Chapter 19.00
ECDC shall fully comply with all provisions of the community
development code, including, but not limited to, review and
approval by the architectural design board.
Section 2. Effective Date. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifi-
cally delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum, and shall take effect
{WSS721634.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 5 -
Packet Page 270 of 393
APPROVED:
MAYOR GARY HAAKENSON
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED:
CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY:
BY
W. SCOTT SNYDER
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
PUBLISHED:
EFFECTIVE DATE:
ORDINANCE NO.
{WSS721634.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 6 -
Packet Page 271 of 393
{WSS721634.DOC;1/00006.900000/}- 7 -
SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. __________
of the City of Edmonds, Washington
On the ____ day of ___________, 2009, the City Council of the City of Edmonds,
passed Ordinance No. _____________. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting
of the title, provides as follows:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE
PROVISIONS OF THE EDMONDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE CHAPTER
17.70 TEMPORARY USES, AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME
EFFECTIVE.
The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request.
DATED this _____ day of ________________, 2009.
CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE
Packet Page 272 of 393
{WSS721634.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 1 -
0006.90000
WSS/gjz
3/4/09
ORDINANCE NO. _______
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE PROVISIONS OF THE
EDMONDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE CHAPTER
17.70 TEMPORARY USES, AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE
SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE.
WHEREAS, temporary structures in excess of 120 feet of floor space are limited
and regulated by the International Building Code but not addressed by the temporary use
provisions of Chapter 17.70; and
WHEREAS, the City Council deems it to be in the public interest to address the
issue of cargo and other temporary storage containers, and
WHEREAS, the existing temporary conditional use permit process may result in
costs in excess of the storage container or security unit to be utilized; and
WHEREAS, these issues were considered at public hearings before the Edmonds
Planning Board resulting in a recommendation for adoption of certain provisions as contained
here in this ordinance; and
WHEREAS, the City Council Community Services and Development Services
Committee have reviewed the recommendations; and
WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on this matter on March 3,
2009; and
WHEREAS, the City Council deems it to be in the public interest to amend
Chapter 17.70 regarding temporary uses in order to extend the time in which temporary uses may
Packet Page 273 of 393
{WSS721634.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 2 -
be maintained, create an administrative, less expensive process to consider such uses, clarify the
definitions and application of temporary use provisions to storage units, tents, canopies and other
temporary structures, NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1.
Chapter 17.70
TEMPORARY USES
Sections:
17.70.000 Security units.
17.70.005 Project sales offices/sales models.
17.70.010 Other temporary buildings.
17.70.020 Temporary parking lots.
17.70.030 Temporary municipal office uses.
17.70.035 Temporary storage units.
17.70.040 Bistro and outdoor dining.
17.70.000 Security units.
A. Definition. A security unit is a building, mobile home, trailer,
or vehicle used temporarily in connection with providing security
during construction of a structure or building for which a valid
building permit has been issued.
B. Conditions. A security unit is permitted in all zones under the
following conditions:
1. All sanitation facilities and safety measures shall be approved in
advance by the building official, health official and other
appropriate city officials.
2. Unless earlier directed by the building official pursuant to
subsection (B)(3) of this section, security units in the following
zones shall be removed after the following time periods:
a. In an RS zone, one year;
b. All other zones, one year, with a one-year extension if the
community development director finds that the project is large
Packet Page 274 of 393
{WSS721634.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 3 -
enough to require the longer period, disregarding any self-imposed
delay.
3. The building official may order the removal of a security unit if
any of the following situations occur:
a. The building permit expires or is cancelled.
b. The building official issues an occupancy permit.
c. The building official determines that the security structure is no
longer needed to provide protection against theft or vandalism.
17.70.005 Project sales offices/sales models.
A. Definition. A project sales office or sales model is space within
an otherwise permitted building used temporarily to support the
sale of multifamily or condominium units.
B. Conditions. A project sales office or sales model is only
permitted to occur on the property containing the project or unit(s)
being offered for sale. The sales office or sales model shall be
discontinued and removed prior to occupancy of the last unit
available for sale on the property.
C. The granting of a permit for a sales office or sales model shall
be reviewed and processed in accordance with the requirements of
ECDC 20.95.040, Staff decision – No notice required.
17.70.010 Other temporary buildings.
Except as provided below in ECDC 17.70.030, a conditional use
permit shall be required to construct a temporary building in any
zone. The permit shall be administratively reviewed by staff and
shall be valid for a period of one year; provided however, that said
permit may be extended by the development services director for a
single one-year extension upon submittal of a written application
prior to the expiration of the original permit. All the requirements
of the zoning district shall be met. An appeal of the staff decision
granting or denying such a permit or extension shall be reviewed
by the hearing examiner in accordance with the requirements for
any other conditional use permit under ECDC 20.100.010, with the
decision being appealable to the city council under the procedures
applicable to any other conditional use permit.
Packet Page 275 of 393
{WSS721634.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 4 -
17.70.020 Temporary parking lots.
See ECDC 17.50.090, which by this reference is incorporated
herein as if set forth in full.
17.70.030 Temporary municipal office uses.
The city council may, at its sole discretion, approve the installation
of a temporary building or mobile office structure to house
municipal office and related storage in conjunction with or in
anticipation of the construction or remodeling of a municipal
facility. Such structure shall be exempt from any other
requirements of the zoning code and the decision of the city
council shall be final. The city staff is hereby directed to provide
for reasonable landscaping and screening of such structure and
sufficient drawings and site plans to adequately inform the council
of the nature and proposed use of the structure, its design and the
anticipated length of time which the structure will be in use. In no
event shall the use of such a temporary structure exceed three years
without the specific authorization of the city council.
17.70.035 Temporary storage units
Defined:
A “Canopy” means a structure, enclosure or shelter constructed of
fabric or pliable materials supported by any manner, except by air
or the contents it protects, and is open without sidewalls or drops
on 75 percent or more of the perimeter.
B. “Cargo or shipping Container” means a standardized, container
designed without an axle or wheels, which was originally,
specifically, or formerly designed for or used in the packing,
shipping, movement or transportation of freight, articles, goods or
commodities.
C. “Tent” means a structure, enclosure or shelter constructed of
fabric or other pliable material supported by any manner except by
air or the contents that it protects.
Cargo or shipping containers. No person shall place or cause to be
placed any cargo or shipping container, regardless of structural
modifications, on any area or any property in a residentially zoned
district that is not subject to the design review process. Property or
projects subject to the design review process may apply for this use
per ECDC 20.10.010. Administrative waivers shall not apply.
Packet Page 276 of 393
{WSS721634.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 5 -
The temporary placement of a portable storage container on a
residentially zoned lot for the purpose of loading and unloading
household contents shall be permitted for a period of time not
exceeding thirty (30) days in a calendar year.
Tents, tarps and canopy structures which use plastic sheeting,
canvas, or other similar pliable materials to cover storage areas,
and/or to be used as garages or carports are regulated in residential
zones:
A. Tents or canopies with a floor area measured to the exterior
wall or post exceeding120 exceeding 200 square feet are
prohibited, except for those used for limited time period for a
special event such as a party or wedding not to exceed twenty-four
(24) hours.
B. Tents and canopies shall comply with setback and height
requirements for accessory structures for the zone. Lot coverage
requirements also apply.
If a tent or canopy is located within 6 feet of another tent(s) or
canopy(s) or attached in any way, they shall be considered as one
(1) tent or canopy and shall be subject to the provisions of J.3.a
and J.3.b for combined floor area and location.
D. Temporary storage units do not require a conditional use
permit.
17.70.040 Bistro and outdoor dining.
A properly zoned and licensed food or beverage service
establishment may temporarily utilize public sidewalks in right-of-
way areas immediately adjacent to its establishment. The area
authorized for use shall be that area of the immediately adjacent
public right-of-way and/or outdoor areas under the lease or
ownership of the applicant lying between the applicant's property
and the public right-of-way. The area authorized for such use shall
not extend beyond the street frontage of the business lessee or
property owner. Any building or structure as such terms are
defined pursuant to the building code adopted by Chapter 19.00
ECDC shall fully comply with all provisions of the community
development code, including, but not limited to, review and
approval by the architectural design board.
Section 2. Effective Date. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifi-
cally delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum, and shall take effect
Packet Page 277 of 393
{WSS721634.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 6 -
five (5) days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the
title.
APPROVED:
MAYOR GARY HAAKENSON
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED:
CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY:
BY
W. SCOTT SNYDER
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
PUBLISHED:
EFFECTIVE DATE:
ORDINANCE NO.
Packet Page 278 of 393
{WSS721634.DOC;1/00006.900000/}- 7 -
SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. __________
of the City of Edmonds, Washington
On the ____ day of ___________, 2009, the City Council of the City of Edmonds,
passed Ordinance No. _____________. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting
of the title, provides as follows:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE
PROVISIONS OF THE EDMONDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE CHAPTER
17.70 TEMPORARY USES, AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME
EFFECTIVE.
The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request.
DATED this _____ day of ________________, 2009.
CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE
Packet Page 279 of 393
0006.90000
WSS/gjz
4/20/09
ORDINANCE NO. _______
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE PROVISIONS OF ECDC
19.05.010 WORK EXEMPT FROM BUILDING PERMITS AND
FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME
EFFECTIVE.
WHEREAS, in the course of reviewing restrictions on temporary structures, the
City Council has determined it to be in the public interest to coordinate the provisions of the
zoning code with those of the State Building Code, and
WHEREAS, the proposed provisions will not result in changes which lessen the
minimum performance standards and objectives contained in the State Building Code as required
pursuant to RCW 19.27.060, NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Edmonds Community Development Code Section 19.05.010
Work exempt from permit is hereby amended to read as follows:
19.05.010 Work exempt from permit.
Exemptions from permit requirements of this code shall not be
deemed to grant authorization for any work to be done in any
manner in violation of the provisions of this code or any other laws
or ordinances of this jurisdiction. It is the property owner’s
responsibility to comply with bulk zoning code standards per
ECDC Title 16 and storm water management provisions per
Chapter 18.30 ECDC. Permits shall not be required for the
following unless limited or prohibited by the provisions of Chapter
19.10 ECDC or ECDC Title 23. In addition to the permit
exemptions of ECDC 19.00.010, the following single family
dwelling exemptions shall apply:
{WSS726171.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 1 -
Packet Page 280 of 393
A. One (1) story detached accessory structures used as tool
and storage sheds, playhouses and similar uses; provided the floor
area (measured to the exterior wall or post) does not exceed 200
square feet, with a maximum eave of twelve (12) inches and
maximum height of fifteen (15) feet. Vehicle storage structures,
such as garages and carports, are not included except as set forth in
ECDC Section 19.05.010(J) for canopies.
B. Window awnings supported by an exterior wall and do not
project more than fifty-four (54) inches from the exterior wall and
do not require additional support. ECDC Title 23 provisions do not
apply.
C. Sport courts less than 2,000 square feet.
D. Dock repair of individual decking members. ECDC Title
23 provisions do not apply.
E. Replacement or repair of existing exterior siding. ECDC
Title 23 provisions do not apply.
F. Replacement or repair of existing window or doors with no
change in size or framing. ECDC Title 23 provisions do not apply.
G. Replacement or repair of individual decking, joists, stair
treads, or intermediate rails. ECDC Title 23 provisions do not
apply.
H. Sidewalks and driveways not more than 30 inches above
adjacent grade, and not over any basement or story below and are
not part of an accessible route, provided a permit is not required by
Chapter 18.60 ECDC.
I. Uncovered platforms, decks, patios, not more than thirty
(30) inches above grade and not over any basement or story below
and are not part of an accessible route.
J. Canopies, as defined in ECDC 17.70.035, accessory to a
single family dwelling, with a floor area measured to the exterior
wall or post not to exceed 200 square feet, for covered storage,
carport or similar use.
Section 2. Effective Date. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifi-
cally delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum, and shall take effect
{WSS726171.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 2 -
Packet Page 281 of 393
APPROVED:
MAYOR GARY HAAKENSON
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED:
CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY:
BY
W. SCOTT SNYDER
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
PUBLISHED:
EFFECTIVE DATE:
ORDINANCE NO.
{WSS726171.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 3 -
Packet Page 282 of 393
{WSS726171.DOC;1/00006.900000/}- 4 -
SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. __________
of the City of Edmonds, Washington
On the ____ day of ___________, 2009, the City Council of the City of Edmonds,
passed Ordinance No. _____________. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting
of the title, provides as follows:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE
PROVISIONS OF ECDC 19.05.010 WORK EXEMPT FROM BUILDING PERMITS AND
FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE.
The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request.
DATED this _____ day of ________________, 2009.
CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE
Packet Page 283 of 393
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
April 28, 2009
Page 11
addresses these issues while supporting individual property rights. He pointed out Issaquah recently
revised their tree code, specifying the number of trees that could be removed from single family,
multifamily and commercial property; defining significant, landmark and protected trees; and limiting the
number of trees that can be removed from a single family lot based on lot size. He concluded Issaquah
had maintained Tree USA recognition for 15 years and it was time for Edmonds to demonstrate the same
regard for its tree canopy.
Roger Oliver, Edmonds, expressed his appreciation to Councilmember Peterson for his efforts to have a
curb cut installed on Maple near the ACE Hardware Store at Old Mill Town. Next, as a user of a
motorized scooter, he pointed out the City’s sidewalks were in horrible condition. He compared the
impact of the 8-inch wheel on his scooter encountering a 1-inch crack in the sidewalk to a 14-inch car tire
encountering a 5-inch crack in the road, a situation that was likely to generate lawsuits and recall
elections.
Carol Hahn, Edmonds, commented another problem with the sidewalks in the City was businesses that
place their signs in the middle of the sidewalk which does not allow adequate space for a scooter to pass.
She suggested businesses place their signs against the wall rather than in the middle of the sidewalk. She
concluded it was becoming more difficult to shop in Edmonds.
Roger Hertrich, Edmonds, referred to Agenda Item 9 and expressed his agreement with the proposed
revision to change the square footage from 120 square feet to 200 square feet. He recommended allowing
tents/canopies of 120 square feet with sides with no regulation and if the 120 square feet limit were
exceeded, a canopy only with no sides be allowed up to 200 square feet.
George Murray, Edmonds, relayed Forbes Magazine recently published a list of the most business-
friendly countries in the world; at the top of the list were Denmark, Norway and Sweden, highly
socialized counties with strong, powerful unions. These Nordic counties operate on three key conditions:
cooperation, conflict avoidance and consensus. He urged the Council to work toward consensus,
comparing a 4-3 vote to an F, a 5-2 vote to a C, a 6-1 vote to a B and a 7-0 vote to an A. He pointed out
the Council had two 7-0 votes tonight.
9. DISCUSSION AND POTENTIAL ACTION ON TEMPORARY BUILDINGS/USES ORDINANCE.
Planning Manager Rob Chave relayed the City Council held a public hearing on March 3, 2009. The
Council did not approve the ordinance and on March 17 referred it to the Community
Services/Development Services Committee. The focus of the Committee’s discussion at their April 14
meeting was on the 120 square foot threshold versus 200 square feet. He noted the change from 120
square feet to 200 square feet was allowable under the building code but would require an amendment to
the residential building code, Chapter 19.05.
Mr. Chave provided several industry examples of temporary buildings, identifying the dimensions and
whether a building permit would be required. He also provided several photographs of temporary
buildings throughout the city.
Mr. Chave emphasized the issue was not just building codes; zoning regulations also apply. For example
if a temporary building was permanently attached to the ground, it must comply with setback and lot
coverage regulations. If the Council increased the threshold there was the potential that residents would
think as long as the canopy was under 200 square feet it could be placed anywhere on the lot. He noted
most code enforcement efforts with regard to canopies were related to location and/or appearance. He
Packet Page 284 of 393
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
April 28, 2009
Page 12
anticipated this issue would be discussed again with regard to setbacks and lot coverage during the code
revision process.
Building Official Ann Bullis explained the proposed building code amendment increased the size of
accessory structures exempt from a building permit from 120 square feet to 200 square feet; the uses stay
the same, tool and storage sheds, playhouses and similar structures. Staff added a reference to ECDC
17.70.035 for canopies used for covered storage and carports. The proposed Building Code amendment is
only for structures accessory to a single family dwelling, not commercial, multi-family, or industrial
buildings. She noted there are other jurisdictions in the area that adopted the same 200 square foot
exemption and this amendment is also contained the 2009 International Building Code which she
anticipated the City would adopt later this year.
Ms. Bullis pointed out work exempt from obtaining a building permit must still meet the building codes.
However, since no permit was issued by the City and no inspections were done, it was the property
owner’s responsibility to meet the building codes. In general, larger exemptions may result in larger,
more complicated code violations for staff to resolve. Since no building permit was required there was
potential for owners without construction knowledge to build an even larger structure, possibly creating a
hazardous condition. And since no building permit was required, citizens may incorrectly presume that
zoning setbacks, height and lot coverage were also exempt which leads to greater expense in altering the
structure to meet these requirements if construction has begun.
Ms. Bullis pointed out in the Building Code, use of a structure is very important; the accessory structure
exemption is specifically for tool and storage sheds, playhouses and similar uses. She provided the
following examples of accessory structure uses where a building permit was required regardless of size,
commenting there was a greater potential for these uses in a larger structure:
• Habitable spaces such as a recreation room, art studio, office, workshop, guest house, pool house,
etc.
• Where plumbing fixtures are installed, such as a sink, shower, water closet, etc.
• Vehicle storage such as a garage or carport
Council President Pro Tem Wambolt recalled Code Enforcement Officer Mike Thies saying the reason
staff was not considering a structure greater than 120 square feet was because it could not obtain a
building permit because it could not meet snow load requirements. He asked how was the inability to
meet snow loads was addressed if a canopy did not need a building permit. Ms. Bullis agreed it was not
necessarily resolved; there were certain structures that would not meet the City’s snow load, wind load or
structural load requirements. However, because a permit was not required, the City did not regulate them.
Councilmember Orvis commented if a resident wanted to build a 200 square foot addition to their home,
they would be required to obtain a permit. Ms. Bullis agreed any habitable addition to a home would
require a permit. A detached tool shed less than 200 square feet would not require a permit under the
proposed ordinance.
Councilmember Peterson asked whether vehicle storage of any size must be permitted. Ms. Bullis
answered except for the canopy structure in the proposed ordinance. Councilmember Peterson noted the
majority of the photographs taken in Edmonds and the majority of the complaints were in regard to
canopies used to store vehicles. He asked whether a 10x10 structure with sides where someone parked
their car on a regular basis would require a permit today. Ms. Bullis answered a structure greater than
120 square feet would require a building permit today. Mr. Chave pointed out even if a building permit
were not required, a canopy permanently attached to the ground must comply with other regulations such
Packet Page 285 of 393
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
April 28, 2009
Page 13
as setbacks and lot coverage issues. Ms. Bullis clarified at the present time, a building permit would be
required for any structure used for vehicle storage.
Councilmember Orvis asked if a 120 square foot canopy was allowed to have walls. Ms. Bullis answered
the definition in the proposed temporary use ordinance required it be at least 75% open.
COUNCIL PRESIDENT PRO TEM WAMBOLT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER
PETERSON, FOR APPROVAL OF EXHIBIT 1, THE OPTION THAT ALLOWS 120 SQUARE
FEET.
Council President Pro Tem Wambolt reviewed the history of this ordinance. It was first reviewed by the
Planning Board on October 8 and again at their November 12 meeting. The Community
Services/Development Services Committee considered it on January 3, the Council held a public hearing
on March 3 where there was a 5-2 vote to direct the City Attorney to prepare the necessary ordinance for
the next Consent Agenda. The ordinance was removed from the March 17 Consent Agenda to allow staff
to address several questions posed by Councilmembers and the Council voted unanimously to refer it to
the Community Services/Development Services Committee for further review. The Committee reviewed
the second option that would allow 200 square feet at their April 14 meeting and did not provide a
recommendation to the Council.
Council President Pro Tem Wambolt was opposed to 200 square feet for safety reasons as well as reasons
provided by staff that it was likely canopies of that size would encroach into the setbacks. He anticipated
this would result in additional workload for the City’s Code Enforcement Officer.
Councilmember Orvis pointed out in 2009 the 200 square foot exemption would be added to the City’s
building code via adoption of the International Building Code. Ms. Bullis explained in the 2009
International Residential Code work exempt section, jurisdictions were allowed to change 200 square feet
to 120 square feet. Councilmember Orvis encouraged the Council to allow 200 square feet, anticipating
there would be fewer things for the Code Enforcement Officer to enforce.
Councilmember Bernheim agreed with Councilmember Orvis and thanked him for his research to clarify
these issues. He was unaware of any injuries from larger canopies such as 200 square feet and did not see
a need to restrict a property owners’ use of their property. He clarified he voted in favor of the 120 square
feet previously due to his understanding the law prohibited structures over 120 square feet.
MOTION FAILED (2-4), COUNCIL PRESIDENT PRO TEM WAMBOLT AND
COUNCILMEMBER PETERSON VOTING YES; AND COUNCILMEMBERS PLUNKETT,
ORVIS, OLSON AND BERNHEIM VOTING NO.
COUNCILMEMBER BERNHEIM MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER ORVIS, TO
ADOPT EXHIBIT 2.
Councilmember Plunkett pointed out staff recommended the Council either approve Exhibit 1 or advertise
for a new public hearing based on the revisions considered by the Community Services/Development
Services Committee. He asked whether the new public hearing was a requirement or recommendation.
Mr. Chave relayed City Attorney Scott Snyder recommended holding a new public hearing due to the
change in Title 17 from 120 square feet to 200 square feet.
COUNCILMEMBER BERNHEIM WITHDREW HIS MOTION WITH THE AGREEMENT OF
THE SECOND.
COUNCILMEMBER BERNHEIM MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER ORVIS, TO
DIRECT STAFF TO SCHEDULE A PUBLIC HEARING. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Packet Page 286 of 393
D R A F T M I N U T E S
Community Service/Development Services Committee Meeting
April 14, 2009
Elected Officials Present: Staff Present:
Peggy Pritchard-Olson, Council member Rob Chave, Planning Manager
Dave Orvis, Chair Ann Bullis, Building Official
The committee convened at 6:00 p.m.
A. Review proposal to ban plastic bags
Bio Park from the City Attorney’s office was present for the discussion. Bio informed the
Committee that the City Attorney’s office is conducting research on how other cities have
approached adopting and implementing a ban on plastic bags. The intent is to develop
options for Edmonds to consider based on this research, including examples of “unintended
consequences” that other jurisdictions may have experienced. Options discussed by the
Committee to consider would be a broad ban on plastic bags as well as a narrowly tailored
ban targeting such businesses as groceries and retailers. Pros and cons for each potential
ban option should be presented and discussed.
ACTION: City Attorney’s office to develop options for a ban on plastic bags and present these for
discussion by the Committee at its next meeting in May.
B. Discussion on temporary buildings/uses Ordinance
The adoption of this ordinance was previously scheduled on the March 17, 2009 City Council
Meeting Consent Agenda, and Council remanded it back to Council Committee for further
discussion.
Chairman Orvis updated Council Member Olsen that he had contacted the County because their
code does not require permits for accessory structures of 200 sf or less and they said the square
footage of the accessory structure could be amended by the City. He contacted staff and informed
him of this last week so that we could discuss the issue.
Ann Bullis, Building Official, confirmed that the City could amend the size of the current accessory
structure exemption to 200 sf., but cautioned that state law does not permit amendments that result
in a code that is less than the performance standards or objectives of the building code. She
explained that the code change that the Director had previously brought before Council included
garages, and the International Residential Code contains several code requirements for garages –
but is less restrictive for carports. In keeping with the intent of the state law and building code, Ms.
Bullis presented the Committee with a draft amendment to ECDC 19.05.010 changing the language
of section A and adding a new exemption J for canopies to correlate with the proposed temporary
use ordinance. The proposal (1) would increase the size of exempt accessory structures to 200 sf,
except for garages and carports, and (2) would allow canopies up to 200 sf to be used as carports.
She also gave them a copy of a proposed change to page 5 of the previously proposed ordinance
that removed garage from the ordinance and increased the size to 200 sf to coordinate with the
proposed Chapter 19 code change.
Packet Page 287 of 393
CS/DS Committee Minutes
April 14, 2009
Page 2
She reminded them of the definition of canopies in the proposed temporary use ordinance and that
they must be open without sidewalls or drops on 75% of the perimeter.
Chairman Orvis asked if they would still need to meet setbacks and staff confirmed they did. Rob
Chave, Planning Manager, discussed the overall issue of temporary vs. permanent structures as
well as setbacks and issues the City’s Code Enforcement Officer was having. This is a complex
subject that the full Council may want to examine.
The Committee felt the proposed changes were desirable and should be forwarded to the full
Council for consideration as part of the overall ordinance.
ACTION: Forward the draft ordinance, with the proposed changes, to the full City Council as an
agenda item for discussion and potential adoption.
C. Discussion on possible amendment regarding minor architectural improvements to
nonconforming buildings
This subject related to a recent code amendment approved by Council whereby minor architectural
improvements – such as bay windows – could be approved for non-conforming buildings, even if the
improvement would technically make the building more non-conforming. The idea was to enable
some minor improvements to be made to non-conforming buildings without creating impacts on
adjoining properties. This amendment was prompted by a situation that arose from improvements
being made to an old multi family building during a remodeling process, where bay windows were
being added to enhance the building’s appearance, but would not meet the setback rules since the
building was already non-conforming.
Staff has learned since the ordinance was passed that it will not remedy the specific situation that
prompted the code amendment, because the building may be too close to the property lines (and
therefore not meet the criteria for minor enhancements outlined in the code amendment). The permit
review process is continuing for the building in question, and they have yet to provide the specific
survey information necessary to determine the building’s exact status relative to the updated code
requirements. Staff will keep the Committee informed as the situation progresses.
ACTION: None necessary.
D. Discussion on 2x6 construction and improved thermal insulation standards for new
construction
Chairman Orvis said he put this item on the agenda to discuss what wall insulation is required for
2x6 construction in Edmonds and if it should be more restrictive. Ms. Bullis responded that in
residential construction, the prescriptive R-value for wall insulation is R-21, but that it could be less if
calculations were done and compensation was made elsewhere in the structure. She explained that
Washington State was one of the first states to adopt an energy code and it is one of the most
restrictive in the nation. Many aspects of other codes in the nation are patterned after Washington’s
energy code.
Chairman Orvis said that gave him good information to research and he would come back later if
needed.
ACTION: None necessary.
2
Packet Page 288 of 393
CS/DS Committee Minutes
April 14, 2009
Page 3
3
The Committee meeting adjourned at 6:32 p.m.
Packet Page 289 of 393
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
March 3, 2009
Page 5
4. PUBLIC HEARING ON THE PLANNING BOARD RECOMMENDATION REGARDING
AMENDMENTS TO CHAPTER 17.70 OF THE EDMONDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
CODE REGARDING TEMPORARY USES AND TEMPORARY BUILDINGS.
Development Services Director Duane Bowman explained this matter had been reviewed by the
Community Services/Development Services Committee at their January meeting and they recommended
it be forwarded to the City Council for a public hearing. He reviewed the Planning Board’s recommended
changes to Chapter 17.70 within three categories, 1) allowing security units in RS zones to be good for
one year, 2) allowing other temporary buildings to be reviewed administratively by the Development
Services Director, along with extension requests and appeals would be to the Hearing Examiner, and 3)
creating a new section regulating temporary storage units; establishing definitions; addressing cargo and
shipping containers, and placement of temporary portable storage containers in residential zones; and
regulations governing tents, tarps and canopy structures.
The current code only allows security units for six months; there have been situations recently when a
resident wants to live in their house while another house is being constructed on the site. Given
construction complexities, staff proposed to extend that period to one year; the Planning Board concurred
with that recommendation.
He explained temporary buildings require a Conditional Use Permit, a process before the Hearing
Examiner, and often the cost of the CUP exceeds the value of the temporary structure. Staff recommends
temporary buildings be reviewed administratively with appeal to the Hearing Examiner. The Planning
Board recommends approval of this change in Chapter 17.70.010.
With regard to temporary storage, Mr. Bowman explained the City currently required a building permit
for any structure with a roof over 120 square feet and it must comply with all applicable setback
requirements. The proposed change would clarify issues that have arisen during code enforcement with
regard to cargo storage containers or moving pods. The proposed change would also clarify the definition
of tents, tarps and canopy structures that use plastic sheeting, canvas or other similar pliable materials to
cover storage areas and or be used as garages or carports in residential zones. He displayed several
examples of canopies covering recreational vehicles and boats in excess of 120 square feet and/or within
the street setback. He also provided photographs of storage containers in excess of 120 square feet.
He recalled the issue that resulted in the most discussion at the Planning Board was temporary storage;
the question is what the Council wanted the City to look like. He clarified residents were not permitted to
build a structure in the setback and thus should not be allowed to install large tent-like structures in the
street setback. He noted if a building is over 120 square feet, the building code required a building permit
be obtained. None of these temporary structures could obtain a building permit because they would not
be able to meet the wind and snow load.
Mayor Haakenson recognized Scout Troop 312 from Edmonds United Methodist Church in the audience,
noting they are present working on obtaining a citizenship badge.
Councilmember Orvis asked if a tent could be temporarily erected to work on a project. Mr. Bowman
answered yes as long as it was less than 120 square feet. Councilmember Orvis assumed a tent would be
considered an impervious surface. Mr. Bowman agreed, noting that was another reason they were
regulated.
For Councilmember Wambolt, Mr. Bowman explained a security unit was used to protect a construction
site. The code currently allows security units for up to six months; staff has found most need to remain
Packet Page 290 of 393
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
March 3, 2009
Page 6
for a year. Councilmember Wambolt questioned whether 12 months would be long enough. Mr.
Bowman responded a provision for an extension could be included.
Councilmember Wambolt noted the chapter only referred to temporary storage units in single family
zones and asked whether multi family zones should be addressed. Mr. Bowman answered the biggest
problems are in the single family zone; development in the multi family zones does not leave much room
for this type of structure.
Council President Wilson inquired about the number of complaints the City receives annually regarding
these structures. Mr. Bowman responded staff received 89 complaints from one resident. He reminded
enforcement was by complaint only. Council President Wilson requested in the future staff provide the
number of complaints they had received. Mr. Bowman answered there were currently 89 valid
complaints filed 18 months ago that staff had delayed enforcement pending the Planning Board’s
recommendation and Council action. He explained typically when a temporary building exceeds 120
square feet, enforcement was based on building codes for a structure over 120 square feet.
Mayor Haakenson explained there was a great deal of retribution when complaints are filed; a neighbor
complained and then the person who is the subject of the complaint then complains about other residents
who have the same type of violation.
Councilmember Orvis pointed out language in Exhibit 4 addressed parties and weddings and would allow
a larger temporary tent structure for a party.
Councilmember Bernheim asked whether there was a prohibition on canopies covering RVs in the current
code. Mr. Bowman answered yes, if they were over 120 square feet, they required a building permit.
Because of the spite complaints, staff froze enforcement action until the Planning Board and Council had
an opportunity to review the matter. Councilmember Bernheim clarified a temporary structure over 120
square feet was not allowed under the current or proposed code. Mr. Bowman agreed, explaining the
intent was to clarify the regulations.
Councilmember Bernheim asked if a canopy over an RV would qualify as a building under the current
code. Mr. Bowman answered they would not. They are considered temporary storage and are regulated
by 17.170.035(4). Councilmember Bernheim observed that was new language and asked what language
in the current code prohibited canopies. Mr. Bowman answered the 120 square foot requirement was in
the building code.
Councilmember Peterson asked if the building code also addressed the setback. Mr. Bowman stated
building in the setback was addressed in the zoning code. He noted it was not consistent to prohibit a
resident from building their garage out to the street, yet allow RVs under a tent-like structure in that
location. Councilmember Peterson summarized the new language incorporated all the information in one
place in the code. Mr. Bowman answered a structure under 120 square feet was treated as an accessory
structure.
Mayor Haakenson opened the public participation portion of the public hearing
Roger Hertrich, Edmonds, referred to Planning Board Member Lovell’s suggestion on page 2 of the
Planning Board’s November 12, 2008 minutes that 120 square feet be adjusted to be more reasonable and
noting a common size was approximately 200 feet. The minutes reflect Mr. Bowman’s comment that the
International Building Code recently changed the size limit to 240 feet but the Edmonds code limits the
size to 120 square feet and if the Planning Board wanted to change the number, revisions to Title 19
would be required. He questioned Mr. Bowman’s continual reference to 120 square feet in the
Packet Page 291 of 393
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
March 3, 2009
Page 7
International Building Code when that had been changed to 240 feet and recommended the regulations for
temporary storage units, 17.70.035(4), be revised to 240 square feet. He noted 89 complaints by one
person indicates there are a lot of canopies being used in the City; the approximate value is $240. He
noted if the canopy structure failed that was the property owners’ loss. He recalled some Planning Board
Members were concerned with regulating temporary structures 120 square feet in size.
Hearing no further comment, Mayor Haakenson closed the public participation portion of the public
hearing.
Council President Wilson assumed the height limit was 15 feet. Mr. Bowman agreed. He asked Mr.
Bowman to comment on the suggestion for 240 square feet. Mr. Bowman responded the International
Building Code was changed to 240 square feet and it was later amended to change it back to 120 square
feet due to snow and wind load. He advised Mr. Thies explained the change to the Planning Board later
in that meeting. He was uncertain why it was changed to 240 square feet and then back to120 square feet.
Council President Wilson asked if the Council could change the requirement to 120 square feet. Mr.
Bowman explained the City would need to propose an amendment to the State Building Code, a difficult
process.
Councilmember Bernheim asked the consequence to the 89 residents of the Council adopting the
proposed change. Mr. Bowman answered enforcement of those valid complaints would commence.
Council President Wilson pointed out this was an example of staff making an interpretation and rather
than enforcing those 89 complaints, requesting the Council affirm or change their position.
Councilmember Bernheim asked if the zoning code could be changed to 200 square feet. Mr. Bowman
answered that would result in a conflict between the building code and zoning code. The purpose for the
size restriction was to address snow and wind load. He clarified the standard established the size at 120
square feet. Councilmember Bernheim commented the complaints were not due to snow load but due to
aesthetics. Mr. Bowman reiterated large, unsecured structures were in violation of the building code.
City Attorney Scott Snyder explained if the zoning code were changed to 200 square feet, one part of the
code would permit something that another part of the code would not allow staff to issue a permit for.
Councilmember Olson commented the clearer the code could be made, the better.
Council President Wilson referred to Chapter 17.70.010 regarding administrative review of other
temporary buildings by staff and asked whether the City could issue an administratively reviewed permit
that would allow a resident to have a canopy for a boat or RV. Mr. Bowman answered canopies for
boats/RVs were regulated under temporary storage units and they could not exceed 120 square feet.
Other temporary buildings referred to a temporary structure on a property for a limited period of time.
Council President Wilson explained he did not want the City to regulate a 10’ x 12’ tent over a car or RV.
He agreed if it were destroyed by wind or snow that was the owners’ responsibility. He commented
surface water runoff was a minor issue and a tarp was no less impermeable than the roof of the car or RV.
He questioned whether there was actually a public safety issue with canopies and asked how the
regulations could be drafted to allow a resident to put up a tent to cover a car or RV such as an
administratively reviewed permit. Mr. Bowman responded he was uncertain how that could be allowed
other than if a resident had one in their rear yard and no one complained. He assured there was a public
safety issue with canopies blowing off as well as an appearance issue.
Packet Page 292 of 393
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
March 3, 2009
Page 8
Council President Wilson commented if the Council did not pass the amendment it would allow a resident
with a 10’ x 12’ tent to maintain it. Mr. Bowman answered code enforcement did not pursue 10’ x 12’
tents unless they were in the setback area. If it was in the setback, it must comply with the accessory
structure regulations.
Councilmember Bernheim commented a 10’ x 12’ tent or less was permitted, larger tents were not. Mr.
Bowman answered it would be permitted but must meet the requirements for an accessory structure with
regard to setbacks, etc.
With the 120 square foot constraint, Councilmember Plunkett asked whether staff could envision a CUP
process. Mr. Bowman answered only if the property owner applied for a building permit and complied
with the building code requirements for wind and snow load. Mr. Snyder reiterated a CUP process was
not typically appropriate because the cost of that process may exceed the value of the tent. If a property
owner was storing valuable materials, there was a CUP process that could be used.
COUNCILMEMBER WAMBOLT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PETERSON,
TO ADOPT THE PLANNING BOARD RECOMMENDATION (EXHIBIT 4) AND DIRECT THE
CITY ATTORNEY TO PREPARE THE NECESSARY ORDINANCE FOR ADOPTION ON THE
NEXT CONSENT AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED (5-2), COUNCIL PRESIDENT WILSON AND
COUNCILMEMBER PLUNKETT VOTING NO.
5. AUDIENCE COMMENTS
Don Hall, Edmonds, expressed his pleasure at the Council’s attempts to make Edmonds more green, in
particular addressing plastic bags. He commented on photographs of sea turtles, sea birds and other
marine life dying from plastic bags, commenting banning plastic bags was the only answer because sea
animals could not wait for a voluntary or bag fee program to reduce plastic bag use. He recognized San
Francisco had banned plastic bags, Los Angeles’ program takes affect in January 2010 and China stopped
making the thin plastic bags, saving $37 million barrels of oil per year. He advised further information
was available on the banplasticbags.net website. With regard to Styrofoam, Seattle banned its use and he
urged the Council to support HB 2089 banning the use of Styrofoam containers in the food service
industry. He congratulated the Edmonds retailers who have eliminated or never used plastic bags.
Diane Buckshnis, Edmonds, announced SustainableEdmonds.org has arranged to meet with Green
Drinks Snohomish on March 10 at the Taki Tiki Bar and Grill at 518 Main Street from 5:30 - 7:30 p.m.
She explained Green Drinks began meeting in Europe in 1989 and now have regular gatherings in more
than 450 cities. Green Drinks is an organic, self-organized network; events are very simple and
unstructured and many people have found employment, made friends, developed new ideas, done deals
and had moments of serendipity.
(Councilmember Wambolt left the meeting at 8:25 p.m.)
6. REVIEW OF CITY POLICY REGARDING SELLING ADVERTISING SPACE.
Parks & Recreation Director Brian McIntosh explained this was a review of the existing City practice of
selling advertising on public assets. This review was requested by Council President Wilson because of
the practice at Yost Pool which may not have been approved by the Council.
He explained the banner program was initiated for the Yost Pool summer season of 2003. In December
2002 as a cost saving measure for fiscal year 2003, Council adopted a budget containing a decision
package to reduce the season at Yost Pool from 101 days to 60 days. At the February 2003 Council
Packet Page 293 of 393
Example of 10 x 20 (200 sf) canopy structure that requires a building
permit since perimeter sidewalls not 75% open
Example of 14x40 (560 sf) 16 foot high canopy structure
that requires a building permit
Packet Page 294 of 393
Example of 10x20 (200 sf) canopy structure exempt from building permit
Example of 10x20 (200 sf) canopy carport structure exempt from building permit
Packet Page 295 of 393
Other Examples...
Packet Page 296 of 393
Packet Page 297 of 393
Packet Page 298 of 393
Packet Page 299 of 393
Packet Page 300 of 393
1
Temporary Uses
Edmonds City Council
April 28, 2009
Where We Are
• City Council public hearing on March 3,
2009.
• Referred to Committee on March 17,
2009.
• Committee discussion on April 14, 2009.
Packet Page 301 of 393
2
Committee Discussion
• Increase threshold for building permit from
120 s.f. to 200 s.f.
• Requires amendment to residential
building code (19.05)
• Allowable under the building code, but
doesn’t change the relationship to other
codes.
Pictures / Examples
14 x 40 (560 s.f.)
16-ft high canopy structure
Building permit REQUIRED
10 x 20 (200 s.f.)
Perimeter side walls not
75% open
Building permit REQUIRED
Packet Page 302 of 393
3
Pictures / Examples
10 x 20 (200 s.f.)
Canopy carport structure
Building permit EXEMPT
10 x 20 (200 s.f.)
Canopy structure
Building permit EXEMPT
More Examples
Packet Page 303 of 393
4
More Examples
Relationship to Zoning Code
• Setback rules apply to most structures, regardless
of size. Lot coverage rules also apply.
• “Structure means a combination of materials
constructed and erected permanently on the
ground or attached to something having a
permanent location on the ground.” [ECDC 21.90.150]
…doesn’t include fences, “minor” improvements
under 3 feet in height.
• Doesn’t address appearance, aesthetics.
Packet Page 304 of 393
5
Relationship to Building Code
and Enforcement
Proposed Building Code Amendment
Main Issues
• Increases size of accessory structures exempt
from a building permit from 120 s.f. 200 s.f.
• Use stays the same: “…tool and storage sheds,
playhouses and similar uses”
• Added reference to ECDC 17.70.035 for Canopies
used for covered storage and carports
• Building Code amendment is only for structures
accessory to a Single Family Dwelling (not
commercial, multi-family, or industrial buildings)
Packet Page 305 of 393
6
Work exempt from obtaining a
building permit must still meet the
building codes.
Since no permit is issued by the City
and no inspections are done, it is the
property owner’s responsibility to
meet the building codes.
In general, larger exemptions
may result in larger, more
complicated violations
Packet Page 306 of 393
7
• Potential for owners without construction
knowledge to build an even larger
structure, possibly creating a hazardous
condition.
Since No Building Permit is Required….
Since No Building Permit is Required….
• Citizens may incorrectly presume that
zoning setbacks, height and lot
coverage are also exempt.
Leading to greater expense in altering
the structure to meet these
requirements.
Packet Page 307 of 393
8
In the building codes,
USE OF A STRUCTURE IS
VERY IMPORTANT
The accessory structure exemption is
specifically for “…tool and storage
sheds, playhouses and similar uses”
• Habitable spaces, such as a recreation room,
art studio, office, workshop, guest house,
pool house, etc.
• Where plumbing fixtures are installed, such
as a sink, shower, water closet, etc.
• Vehicle storage such as a garage or carport
There is greater potential for these uses in a
larger structure.
Examples of Accessory Structure Uses
Where a Building Permit is Required
Regardless of Size
Packet Page 308 of 393
AM-2334 5.
Presentation on 2009 Levy Options
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:06/16/2009
Submitted By:Kathleen Junglov, Finance
Submitted For:Mayor Haakenson Time:30 Minutes
Department:Finance Type:Action
Review Committee:
Committee Action:Recommend Review by Full Council
Information
Subject Title
Presentation on 2009 levy options.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Information provided for discussion.
Previous Council Action
Continuation of ongoing council discussion regarding levy options.
Narrative
In addition to the information attached, Mayor Haakenson will be making a presention on the levy
options.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: $3.75M Levy Forecast
Link: Current Forecast June 9, 2009
Link: Summary of Levy Decision Packages
Link: Cuts Previously Discussed
Link: Levy Decision Package Narratives
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 06/11/2009 01:39 PM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 06/11/2009 01:41 PM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 06/11/2009 02:08 PM APRV
Form Started By: Kathleen
Junglov
Started On: 06/10/2009 03:44
PM
Final Approval Date: 06/11/2009
Packet Page 309 of 393
Packet Page 310 of 393
Packet Page 311 of 393
Packet Page 312 of 393
Packet Page 313 of 393
Packet Page 314 of 393
Packet Page 315 of 393
Packet Page 316 of 393
Packet Page 317 of 393
Packet Page 318 of 393
Packet Page 319 of 393
Packet Page 320 of 393
Packet Page 321 of 393
Packet Page 322 of 393
Packet Page 323 of 393
AM-2328 8.
Red Light Cameras
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:06/16/2009
Submitted By:Gerry Gannon, Police Department
Submitted For:Al Compaan Time:20 Minutes
Department:Police Department Type:Action
Review Committee:
Committee Action:Recommend Review by Full Council
Information
Subject Title
Red light camera installation.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
The staff recommends that the City Council approve this agenda item for the Mayor to sign an
agreement with ATS for installation of red light cameras at two locations. One location is
westbound 220th St SW at SR99. The second location is westbound SR104 at 100th Ave W.
Previous Council Action
Council had previously approved the contract agreement with ATS for the traffic study of three
intersections. Public Safety Committee reviewed Violation Incident Monitoring System (VIMS )
study at its meeting of April 14th, 2009.
Narrative
Two surveys have been completed by ATS (American Traffic Solutions, Inc) of three intersections
that the police and traffic engineer felt were safety issues due to observed red light violations and
documented collisions. The three intersections are SR104/100th Avenue W, SR99/238th Street
SW, and SR99/220th Street SW. Based on the two surveys conducted by ATS the two approaches
(direction of travel) that meet the VIMS (Violation Incident Monitoring System) contract criteria
are WB 220th Street SW at SR99 and WB SR104 at 100th Avenue W.
The first survey conducted during October 2008 for westbound 220th Street SW at SR99 showed
a total of 29 violations (6 left, 2 straight, and 21 right). During March 2009 a second survey was
conducted with the results of that survey being similar to the October 2008 survey, with 27
violations (2 left, 1 straight, and 24 right). As a note, ATS sets the system to capture right turn
violations at a speed of 5+ mph.
The first survey conducted during October 2008 for westbound SR104 at 100 Avenue W showed
a total of 11 violations (2 left, 3 straight, and 6 right). The March 2009 survey of the same
direction at the same intersection showed 2 violations (1 straight and 1 right), a significant drop of
violations.
This installation of the red light cameras is cost neutral for the City. ATS covers all permit and
installation costs of the cameras. For its services ATS will receive $4,750 per camera each
Packet Page 324 of 393
month. This equates to 1.27 notices of infraction each day at each location.
Attached are the two surveys for the recommended locations for the installation of the red light
camera, the VIMS contract, a draft ordinance, and the estimated violations and revenue. The
attached contract has been reviewed and is approved to form by the city attorney.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: March 2009 VIMS Study
Link: Oct 2008 VIMS Study
Link: Annual Violations and Estimated Revenue
Link: Draft Ordinance
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 06/11/2009 01:57 PM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 06/11/2009 01:59 PM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 06/11/2009 02:08 PM APRV
Form Started By: Gerry
Gannon
Started On: 06/10/2009 10:33
AM
Final Approval Date: 06/11/2009
Packet Page 325 of 393
Packet Page 326 of 393
Packet Page 327 of 393
Packet Page 328 of 393
Packet Page 329 of 393
Packet Page 330 of 393
Packet Page 331 of 393
Packet Page 332 of 393
Packet Page 333 of 393
Packet Page 334 of 393
Packet Page 335 of 393
Packet Page 336 of 393
Packet Page 337 of 393
Packet Page 338 of 393
Packet Page 339 of 393
Estimated Revenue from Red Light Cameras
As of May 29, 2009
Intersection #1 Intersection #2 Total
Violations per Day 27 11 38
Violations @ 60%16 7 23
Violations per Year 5,913 2,409 8,322
Estimated Ticket Amount $90 $90 $90
Estimated Annual Revenue $532,170 $216,810 $748,980
Cost Per Month $4,750 $4,750 $9,500
Cost Per Year $57,000 $57,000 $114,000
FTE to handle increased citations $60,000
Estimated Net Revenue $475,170 $159,810 $574,980
L:\Productiondb\AGENDA\CCOUNCIL\0065_2328_Red Light Cameras Annual estimated revenue and
violations.xls 6/12/2009 2:55 PM
Packet Page 340 of 393
ORDINANCE NO. ______
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING A NEW CHAPTER
8.20 OF THE EDMONDS CITY CODE, ESTABLISHING
STANDARDS AND AUTHORIZING USE OF AUTOMATED
TRAFFIC SAFETY CAMERA, PROVIDING FOR
SEVERABILITY AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
WHEREAS, some of the worst traffic accidents — those involving right-angle
collisions at high rates of speed — are the result of running red lights, and
WHEREAS, studies have shown that these accidents involve more serious injury
and deaths than other kinds of accidents at signalized intersections; and
WHEREAS, the strategic placement of automated cameras at these intersections to
record red light running violations has been shown to reduce the frequency of violations,
corresponding injuries, and associated economic costs; and
WHEREAS, some of the most tragic traffic accidents — those involving school
children — are the result of speeding in school zones; and
WHEREAS, the strategic placement of automated cameras in school zones to record
speeding violations has been shown to reduce the frequency of violations, corresponding injuries,
and associated economic costs; and
WHEREAS, serious accidents that threaten both motor vehicle and train operators
and passengers are the result of disregard of railroad crossing signals; and
WHEREAS, the City of Edmonds has several arterial intersections and railroad
crossings that would benefit from the strategic placement of automated traffic safety cameras; and
WHEREAS, the City of Edmonds has numerous school zones that would benefit
from the strategic placement of automated traffic safety cameras; and
{BFP717664.DOC;1/00006.900160/}
Packet Page 341 of 393
WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Washington has added a new section
to Chapter 46.63 RCW authorizing as well as regulating the use of automated traffic safety
cameras by municipalities; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of Edmonds recognizes the value of implementing
an automated enforcement program in the furtherance of its goals in creating a safe environment
for its citizenry; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. A new Chapter 8.20, Automated Traffic Safety Cameras., is hereby
adopted into Title 8 of the Edmonds City Code to read as follows:
Chapter 8.20
Automated Traffic Safety Cameras
ECC 8.20.010 Automated Traffic Safety Cameras Defined
and Use Authorized.
ECC 8.20.020 Notice of Infraction and Fine.
ECC 8.20.030 Request for Hearing.
ECC 8.20.040 Presumption of Committed Infraction /
Presumption Overcome.
ECC 8.20.050 Infractions Processed.
ECC 8.20.060 Nonexclusive Enforcement.
8.20.010 Automated Traffic Safety Cameras
Defined and Use Authorize.
A. As used in this Chapter, "automated traffic safety camera,"
or variations thereof, shall mean a device that uses a vehicle sensor
installed to work in conjunction with an intersection traffic control
system, a railroad grade crossing control system, or a speed
measuring device, and a camera synchronized to automatically
record one or more sequenced photographs, microphotographs, or
electronic images of the rear of a motor vehicle at the time the
vehicle fails to stop when facing a steady red traffic control signal
or an activated railroad grade crossing control signal, or exceeds a
speed limit in a school speed zone as detected by a speed
measuring device.
{BFP717664.DOC;1/00006.900160/}
Packet Page 342 of 393
B. Law enforcement officers of the City of Edmonds and
persons commissioned by the City of Edmonds Police Department
are authorized to use automated traffic safety cameras and related
automated systems to detect one or more of the following: (1)
stoplight violations; (2) railroad crossing violations; and (3) school
speed zone violations.
C. The use of automated traffic safety cameras is subject to the
following restrictions:
1. Use of automated traffic safety cameras is restricted to
arterial intersections, railroad crossings and school speed zones
only; and
2. Automated traffic safety cameras may only take pictures of
the vehicle and vehicle license plate and only while an infraction is
occurring. Pictures taken by automated traffic safety cameras may
not reveal the face of the driver or of the passengers in the vehicle.
D. The City shall clearly mark all locations where automated
traffic safety cameras are in use by placing signs in locations that
clearly indicate to the driver that he or she is entering a zone where
traffic laws are enforced by an automated traffic safety camera.
8.20.020 Notice of Infraction and Fine
A. Whenever any vehicle is photographed by an automatic
traffic safety camera, a notice of infraction shall be mailed to the
registered owner of the vehicle within fourteen days of the
violation, or to the renter of the vehicle within fourteen days of
establishing the renter’s name and address under this section.
B. If the registered owner of the vehicle is a rental car
business, the law enforcement agency shall, before a notice of
infraction is issued, provide a written notice to the rental car
business that a notice of infraction may be issued to the rental car
business if the rental car business does not, within eighteen days of
receiving the written notice, provide to the issuing agency by
return mail:
1. A statement under oath stating the name and known
mailing address of the individual driving or renting the vehicle
when the infraction occurred; or
2. A statement under oath that the business is unable to
{BFP717664.DOC;1/00006.900160/}
Packet Page 343 of 393
determine who was driving or renting the vehicle at the time the
infraction occurred; or
3. In lieu of identifying the vehicle operator, the rental car
business may pay the applicable penalty. Timely mailing of this
statement to the issuing law enforcement agency relieves a rental
car business of any liability under this Chapter for the notice of
infraction.
C. The law enforcement officer issuing the notice of infraction
shall include with it a certificate or facsimile thereof, based upon
inspection of photographs, microphotos or electronic images
produced by an automated traffic safety camera, stating the facts
supporting the notice of infraction. This certificate or facsimile is
prima facie evidence of the facts contained in it and is admissible
in a proceeding charging a violation under this Chapter.
D. The registered owner of a vehicle is responsible for an
infraction detected through the use of an automated traffic safety
camera unless the registered owner overcomes the presumption set
forth in ECC 8.20.040, or, in the case of a rental car business,
satisfies the conditions under Subsection (B) of this Section. If
appropriate under the circumstances, a renter identified under
Subsection (B) of this Section is responsible for an infraction.
E. All photographs, microphotographs or electronic images
prepared under this Chapter are for the exclusive use of law
enforcement in the discharge of duties under this Chapter and, as
provided in RCW 46.63.170(1)(f), they are not open to the public
and may not be used in a court in a pending action or proceeding
unless the action or proceeding relates to a violation under this
Chapter. Photograph, microphotograph or electronic image may
not be used for any purpose other than enforcement of violations
under this Chapter, and they may not be retained longer than
necessary to enforce this Chapter.
F. The amount of the fine issued for an infraction generated
through the use of an automated traffic safety camera authorized
under this Chapter shall be equivalent to the maximum amount of
fine that may be issued for a parking infraction within the City.
8.20.030 Request for Hearing
A person receiving a notice of infraction based on evidence
detected by an automated traffic safety camera may respond to the
notice by mail. The person receiving the infraction may also
{BFP717664.DOC;1/00006.900160/}
Packet Page 344 of 393
request a hearing.
8.20.040 Presumption of Committed Infraction /
Presumption Overcome
A. In a traffic infraction case involving an infraction detected
through the use of an automated traffic safety camera under this
Chapter, proof that the particular vehicle described in the notice of
traffic infraction was involved in a stoplight violation, railroad
crossing violation and/or school speed zone violation, together
with proof that the person named in the notice of infraction was at
the time of the violation the registered owner of the vehicle, shall
constitute in evidence a prima facie presumption that the registered
owner of the vehicle was the person in control of the vehicle at the
point where, and for the time during which, the violation occurred.
B. This presumption may be overcome only if the registered
owner states, under oath, in a written statement to the court or in
testimony before the court that the vehicle involved was, at the
time, stolen or in the care, custody, or control of some person other
than the registered owner.
8.20.050 Infractions Processed
Infractions detected through the use of automated traffic safety
cameras shall not become part of the driving record of the person
to whom the infraction is issued. Additionally, infractions
generated by the use of automated traffic safety cameras under this
Chapter shall be processed in the same manner as parking
infractions.
8.20.060 Nonexclusive Enforcement.
Nothing in this section prohibits a law enforcement officer form
issuing a notice of traffic infraction to a person in control of a
vehicle at the time a violation occurs under RCW 46.63.030(1)(a),
(b), or (c).
Section 2. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance
should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity
or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence,
clause or phrase of this ordinance.
{BFP717664.DOC;1/00006.900160/}
Packet Page 345 of 393
Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power
specifically delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum, and shall take
effect (5) days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the
title.
APPROVED:
MAYOR GARY HAAKENSON
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED:
CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY:
BY
W. SCOTT SNYDER
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
PUBLISHED:
EFFECTIVE DATE:
ORDINANCE NO.
{BFP717664.DOC;1/00006.900160/}
Packet Page 346 of 393
{BFP718924.DOC;1/00006.900160/} -7-
SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. __________
of the City of Edmonds, Washington
On the ____ day of ___________, 2007, the City Council of the City of Edmonds,
passed Ordinance No. _____________. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting
of the title, provides as follows:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING A NEW CHAPTER
8.20 OF THE EDMONDS CITY CODE, ESTABLISHING
STANDARDS AND AUTHORIZING USE OF AUTOMATED
TRAFFIC SAFETY CAMERA, PROVIDING FOR
SEVERABILITY AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request.
DATED this _____ day of ________________, 2007.
CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE
Packet Page 347 of 393
AM-2340 9.
Professional Services Agreement for Rick Jenness
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:06/16/2009
Submitted By:Carl Nelson, Administrative Services Time:15 Minutes
Department:Administrative Services Type:Action
Review Committee:Finance
Committee Action:Recommend Review by Full Council
Information
Subject Title
Authorization for the Mayor to sign a Professional Services Agreement with Rick Jenness.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Mayor be authorized to sign agreement.
Previous Council Action
Narrative
To move forward the City's interest in best utilizing its fiber resources Rick Jenness has been
providing consulting and project management services on an ad hoc basis since 2006. Rick's effort
extends across two purchasing policies and due to the discretionary authority allowed in both
policies neither of which required Rick's services be set out to bid.
Due to the City's on-going interest to provide fiber services, and a desire on the part of the CTAC
committee to be transparent in the City's efforts, it recommended at the November 14, 2007
finance committee meeting that a personal services contract be drawn up to formalize the
relationship between Rick and the City.
It has taken longer than expected to negotiate and complete, but over the period Rick has reported
to Council on his progress (see attached Budget Preparation Memo, Fiber Route presentation, and
Executive Summary) and has been instrumental in the development of the City's court case to
affirm its right to provide fiber services.
This agreement provides work items and an on-going agreement by which Rick can continue to
assist the City.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: Fiber Project Exec Summary
Link: Council Presentation
Link: Budget Memo
Link: Agreement
Link: Statement of Work 1
Packet Page 348 of 393
Link: Statement of Work 2
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 06/11/2009 01:39 PM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 06/11/2009 01:41 PM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 06/11/2009 02:08 PM APRV
Form Started By: Carl
Nelson
Started On: 06/11/2009 11:05
AM
Final Approval Date: 06/11/2009
Packet Page 349 of 393
Edmonds Broadband
Initiative
Confidential Executive Summary
Prepared By:
Rick Jenness – Program Director
7/16/2008
Packet Page 350 of 393
E d m o n d s B r o a d b a n d I n i t i a t i v e – E x e c u t i v e S u m m a r y Page 2
Contents
Contents ............................................................................................................................... 2
Executive Summary ............................................................................................................. 3
Purpose ............................................................................................................................ 3
Background and Current State Assessment .................................................................... 3
Future Vision Roadmap .................................................................................................. 5
Phase 1 - (Currently in Process) .................................................................................. 5
Broadband Test Case ..................................................................................................... 6
Phase 3 – Economic Development Magnet .................................................................. 7
Phase 4 –Targeted Neighborhood Build-out ................................................................ 8
Phase 5 – Priority Neighborhood backfill .................................................................... 9
Packet Page 351 of 393
E d m o n d s B r o a d b a n d I n i t i a t i v e – E x e c u t i v e S u m m a r y Page 3
Executive Summary
Purpose
This document is intended to outline the current state and future vision of the Edmonds
Broadband Initiative proposed by the Citizens Technology Advisory Committee (CTAC).
This is a summary document that distills over 4 years of work by the committee and
countless hours by City Staff and outside consultants. It does not attempt to provide all
of the details, but will refer to other documents where appropriate.
Background and Current State Assessment
Date Milestone
November, 2004 The Edmonds City Council approved the creation of the Citizens
Technology Advisory Committee. This brought together several informal
citizen interest groups (Community Wi-Fi, Community Broadband and
Cable TV Franchise) under the umbrella of a sponsored Council Sub-
committee. Councilmember Mauri Moore and Peggy Prichard Olsen
represented the council.
June, 2005 The Washington Department of Transportation (WSDOT) contacted the
City with an urgent request for right of way rights within the City as they
sought to construct a fiber link from the Edmonds ferry terminal to the
WSDOT Fiber backbone running down the middle of I-5. In exchange for
expedited approval, WSDOT granted the City rights to 24 of the 36 strands
of fiber traversing the City. These 24 strands terminate in the Public
Works building off of 212th and in the upstairs of the Fire Station in the
Public Safety building.
December, 2005 After termination of the fibers was completed, the City utilized two of the
strands to connect the Public Works phone system to the main phone
system at City Hall. A Verizon T-1 was displaced in this process saving the
City $500/month.
March, 2006 Dan Clements entered into discussions with the City of Seattle and
acquired 6 strands of fiber that extend from the County line (238th) to the
Westin Building in downtown Seattle. The Westin is the major
telecommunications hub for the Pacific Northwest and one of only 4 tier 1
Internet connection points on the West Coast.
October 2006 Edmonds releases a “Request for Information” (RFI) seeking consultants
capable of assisting the City with various aspects of the broadband
initiative. Nine (9) firms respond, and seven (7) firms ultimately
submitted a response to the RFI.
Packet Page 352 of 393
E d m o n d s B r o a d b a n d I n i t i a t i v e – E x e c u t i v e S u m m a r y Page 4
Date Milestone
December 2006 The City subcontracted to install 24 strands of Fiber from the PW Building
to the termination point of the Seattle Fiber bundle at 238th Street and
Hwy 99.
January 2007 NetRiver Corporation of Lynnwood contracted with the City to utilize 2 of
the 6 strands of fiber connected to the Westin for $1,200/month. That
amount will increase to $1,500/month in August of 2008.
June 2007 The City of Edmonds IT department contracted with TCS at the Westin
Building to provide internet access for the City and its partners utilizing
one of the remaining pairs of fiber
July 2007 Edmonds School District and Edmonds Community College express
interest in using the City’s fiber connection as a back-up internet
connection for their institutions.
September 2007 Edmonds contracts with the consulting firm Dynamic Cities to assist the
City in the preparation of a Business Plan document that estimates the
costs and expected revenues of a Citywide fiber optic network. Shortly
after the contract is executed, Dynamic City is acquired by PacketFront, a
major “Fiber to the Home” player headquartered in Sweden. Virtually all
of the Dynamic City consultants are retained by PacketFront.
December 2007 Stevens Hospital expresses interest in utilizing the City’s fiber
infrastructure as a way to expand their capacity and reduce costs.
January 2008 Stevens Hospital signs an agreement to utilize the Edmonds Fiber Network
at an initial rate of $1,600/month. Work begins on acquiring the right of
way permits from PUD
March 2008 SNOCOM expresses interest in utilizing the City’s fiber optic infrastructure
as a way to expand their capacity and reduce costs for the municipalities
they serve.
April 2008 Citing budget concerns, Edmonds School district decides to defer
connection to the Edmonds Fiber Network for at least one year. The EFN
was to be a back-up for internet provider for the District.
May 2008 Edmonds and the City of Lynnwood agree to install fiber Optic conduit
under the new sidewalk being installed as a part of the Olympic View Drive
phase 1 project. Identical conduit will be installed in 2009 as a part of the
Phase II project
June 2008 Edmonds completes a wireless meter reading study showing the costs and
benefits of reading the water meters
July 2008 Edmonds Community College signs an agreement to utilize the Edmonds
Fiber Network
Packet Page 353 of 393
E d m o n d s B r o a d b a n d I n i t i a t i v e – E x e c u t i v e S u m m a r y Page 5
Future Vision Roadmap
The vision for the Edmonds Broadband Initiative is to provide an ultra high speed fiber
optic communication connection to every home and business within the city. This
communication network would then be utilized commercial communications and video
service providers providing consumer services along with the City who will utilize the
network for its municipal services. Unlike the old model where providers (like Verizon
and Comcast) were required to install their own (duplicate) networks, the City’s ultra
high capacity network would be open to numerous providers to share thus reducing
their cost of entry into the Edmonds market and ultimately reducing the subscription
costs to the consumer. Edmonds would charge a fee to the service provider for each
Edmonds customer connected to their service. The fee would vary according to the
service provided with telephone service being the least expensive and streaming video
being the most expensive. The services to be offered would be Voice (Telephone), high
speed internet and video (Cable TV) services. These are often referred to as the “Triple
Play”
It has been estimated by the City’s consultants (Dynamic City / PacketFront) that
construction of the network would cost approximately 28 million ($28,000,000) if the
entire City were wired all at one time in advance. (The committee refers to this as the
“Build it and they will come” approach). The consultant further estimated that between
35 and 40% of the potential customers would need to sign contracts for the network to
be consistently cash flow positive. The committee feels that such an approach contains
too much risk, and favors a more incremental approach that is broken into 5 major
phases:
Phase 1 - (Currently in Process)
This phase extends the existing WSDOT backbone to connect other public sector
partners who require high volume internet capacity. Currently, all four of our signed
and about to be signed partners have agreed to pay the capital costs required to connect
them to the existing backbone, so the City is incurring no costs for this phase of
expansion. Because all of the potential partners are municipal or non-profit entities, the
City is not risking legal confrontation with the private sector. Additional Public,
Education & Government (PEG) prospects include:
• City of Lynnwood
• City of Mountlake Terrace
• City of Mukilteo
• City of Mill Creek
Packet Page 354 of 393
E d m o n d s B r o a d b a n d I n i t i a t i v e – E x e c u t i v e S u m m a r y Page 6
• Snohomish County
• Port of Edmonds
• Mukilteo School District
• Shoreline School District
• Sno-Isle Library District
This is not an unlimited market, but the City will quickly recoup its initial investments
even if none of these additional entities get connected.
Phase 2 – Extending the backbone
This phase would create a fiber optic ring that would connect the 5 major zones of the
City. This would be an extension to the existing Fiber backbone and is designed to
support two municipal goals:
1. Electronic Meter reading – By installing two antennas and several
repeating transmitters, the public works department can read all of the water
meters in the City electronically thus saving significant operation costs and
reducing the city’s carbon footprint
2. Public Safety / Municipal Wireless – Installing wireless networking
antennas and transmitters in key locations around the City will allow Public
Safety and municipal employee’s access to the City Network while working in
the field. Police Officers, Fire Fighters, Fire Marshalls, inspectors and Public
works employees would all benefit by being able to access their work related
databases and applications without having to drive back to their office. This
will improve productivity, reduce costs and reduce the City’s carbon footprint.
Broadband Test Case
Because of the large capacity of the fiber optic technology, this phase creates a
substantial surplus of communications capacity in key areas of the City. The
City and its citizens would be well served if the City were able to lease some of
this excess capacity to commercial and residential users within the City thus
accelerating the payback time of the investment. Since it is legally unclear
whether the City can resell this excess capacity, the bonds required to fund
this phase become the motivation to seek a legal ruling in Snohomish County
Superior Court. The City’s Bond Attorney feels confident the City will prevail
in this case, and other Cities in the region have expressed interest in seeing
that a favorable ruling in that case is upheld on appeal.
Packet Page 355 of 393
E d m o n d s B r o a d b a n d I n i t i a t i v e – E x e c u t i v e S u m m a r y Page 7
Several other key milestones are built into this phase:
1. Neighborhood Pilot Project – This would provide 3-5 locations near the
extended backbone where pilot installations of the fiber technology would take
place. One might be at the Francis Anderson center and would be set-up like a
“‘window into the future” allowing residents to come down and see the
capabilities of the network.
2. Green Edmonds – As a part of the pilot location projects, we would create a
demonstration of the conservation potential of electronic meter reading in
partnership with the PUD and Puget Sound Energy. Every minute, the water,
electrical and gas meters would be read and visually presented to the property
owner showing them in real time their water and energy consumption. Experts
maintain that presenting this information to consumers in real-time, easy to
understand visual format will lead to conscious conservation efforts that can save
as much 20%
3. Distance Learning / Video Conferencing – In partnership with Edmonds
Community College, Edmonds School District and Stevens Hospital, the pilot
locations would be enabled to demonstrate two way video conferencing for
entertainment, educational and healthcare applications
Phase 3 – Economic Development Magnet
After the test case is successfully completed, the Edmonds Fiber Network (EFN) can
then be marketed in conjunction with the City’s Economic Development efforts and to
major business entities in the South County region. Major medical facilities, on-line
retailers and high tech companies will all be attracted to Edmonds for the
telecommunication services that can be offered. Identifying 100 new commercial users
could generate up to $2M per year in new City revenue. Spread out over 2-3 years, this
growth would require some business development effort along with some increased
operations and customer support (probably contracted), but would require only modest
incremental capital expenditures. The below table outlines some of the economic
benefits that begin to accrue in this phase.
Packet Page 356 of 393
E d m o n d s B r o a d b a n d I n i t i a t i v e – E x e c u t i v e S u m m a r y Page 8
Active
Customers
Average
Monthly
Revenue
Annual
Revenue
Management
& Overhead
Business
Dev
Tech &
Customer
Support
Net Annual
Revenue
25 $1,700 $510,000 $80,000 $80,000 $150,000 $200,000
50 $1,500 $900,000 $150,000 $100,000 $150,000 $650,000
100 $1,500 $1,800,000 $150,000 $150,000 $200,000 $1,450,000
200 $1,500 $3,600,000 $175,000 $175,000 $250,000 $3,175,000
300 $1,300 $4,680,000 $200,000 $200,000 $300,000 $4,180,000
Phase 4 –Targeted Neighborhood Build-out
The biggest problem with the “Build it and they will come” approach is that City is
required to underwrite a significant financial investment ($28,000,000) before any
revenue is collected. Phase 2 and 3 of this plan mitigate this risk somewhat, but a better
plan put forward by Dynamic City / Packetfront calls for targeted neighborhood build-
out.
This approach, being used extensively in Europe and Scandinavia right now, calls for
individual neighborhoods (75 – 100 homes) to be identified and marketed to BEFORE
the fiber installation is started. Our consultants advise us that individual activists
typically surface in each neighborhood and will take the lead in making individual
contact with their neighbors. Once a neighborhood obtains a commitment from 60% of
the locations, the City will then schedule the build-out, laying fiber to the street for the
entire neighborhood but connecting only those who have committed to the services. It
is possible that certain areas adjacent to the City but not within the City limits
(Woodway) might be considered in this phase
This approach will be more expensive and take longer to complete than building the
entire network in one pass, but it avoids the significant financial risks of front ending
the entire investment with no immediate revenue on the horizon.
A key component of success in this phase will be developing a funding mechanism for
home installation costs whereby the property owner agrees to pay a $15 per month fee
(as an example) tacked on to their water bill to amortize the cost of installing fiber to
their home.
Packet Page 357 of 393
E d m o n d s B r o a d b a n d I n i t i a t i v e – E x e c u t i v e S u m m a r y Page 9
Phase 5 – Priority Neighborhood backfill
At some point in Phase 4, the number of new neighborhoods reaching the 60%
commitment threshold will drop off and the negative economics of starting and stopping
construction crews will become acute. Since 100 percent coverage of the City is a stated
goal, Edmonds will continue construction in neighborhoods that have not reached the
60% threshold. Each decision will be made individually, but certainly neighborhoods
with 50% commitments will likely be backfilled first and the neighborhoods with little or
no interest in the network will be built last, if at all.
Summary
The Edmonds Broadband Initiative has the potential of improving the Edmonds Way of
Life for its citizens in a number of ways:
1. Reduced Cost of telecommunications services as compared to the existing
monopolies of Verizon and Comcast (20-40%)
2. Greater access to local content (High school Sports) and educational
programming.
3. Improved Economic development and revitalization of the downtown and Hwy
99 business districts
4. Lower City costs through productivity increases of municipal employees
5. Lower energy consumption and carbon output through real time meter
monitoring and fewer vehicle trips.
Packet Page 358 of 393
Re
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
t
o
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
CT
A
C
C
o
m
m
i
t
t
e
e
&
S
t
a
f
f
9/
0
2
/
2
0
0
8
Pr
e
s
e
n
t
e
d
b
y
Ri
c
k
J
e
n
n
e
s
s
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
35
9
of
39
3
`
Re
v
i
e
w
o
f
C
T
A
C
/
E
F
N
V
i
s
i
o
n
`
Re
v
i
e
w
o
f
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
F
i
b
e
r
A
s
s
e
t
s
`
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
&
F
u
t
u
r
e
u
s
e
s
o
f
t
h
e
ne
t
w
o
r
k
`
Ro
a
d
m
a
p
t
o
t
h
e
v
i
s
i
o
n
`
Re
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
2
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
36
0
of
39
3
`
Fu
t
u
r
e
V
i
s
i
o
n
◦
“C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
a
m
u
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
l
y
o
w
n
e
d
f
i
b
e
r
-
o
p
t
i
c
n
e
t
w
o
r
k
av
a
i
l
a
b
l
e
t
o
e
v
e
r
y
h
o
m
e
a
n
d
b
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
i
n
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
th
a
t
d
e
l
i
v
e
r
s
V
o
i
c
e
,
I
n
t
e
r
n
e
t
a
n
d
T
e
l
e
v
i
s
i
o
n
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
fr
o
m
a
n
u
m
b
e
r
o
f
c
o
m
p
e
t
i
n
g
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
r
s
,
mo
r
e
e
c
o
n
o
m
i
c
a
l
l
y
a
n
d
a
t
w
o
r
l
d
c
l
a
s
s
s
p
e
e
d
s
.
”
◦
Wo
r
k
i
n
g
w
i
t
h
l
o
c
a
l
g
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
,
e
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
,
a
n
d
co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
p
a
r
t
n
e
r
s
,
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
a
n
d
d
i
s
t
r
i
b
u
t
e
l
o
c
a
l
l
y
re
l
e
v
a
n
t
c
o
n
t
e
n
t
t
h
a
t
e
n
r
i
c
h
e
s
a
n
d
e
n
h
a
n
c
e
s
t
h
e
Ed
m
o
n
d
s
C
i
v
i
c
e
x
p
e
r
i
e
n
c
e
.
3
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
36
1
of
39
3
4
24
S
t
r
a
n
d
s
–
P
S
B
t
o
F
e
r
r
y
(F
r
o
m
W
S
D
O
T
2
0
0
5
)
24
S
t
r
a
n
d
s
–
P
W
A
t
o
P
S
B
(F
r
o
m
W
S
D
O
T
2
0
0
5
)
24
S
t
r
a
n
d
s
–
P
W
A
t
o
2
3
8
th
Ci
t
y
b
u
i
l
t
(
2
0
0
6
)
Ci
t
y
O
w
n
e
d
Fi
b
e
r
A
s
s
e
t
s
6
S
t
r
a
n
d
s
2
3
8
th
to
W
e
s
t
i
n
Bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
(
2
0
0
5
)
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
36
2
of
39
3
5
24
S
t
r
a
n
d
s
–
P
S
B
t
o
F
e
r
r
y
(F
r
o
m
W
S
D
O
T
-
2
0
0
5
)
24
S
t
r
a
n
d
s
–
P
W
A
t
o
P
S
B
(F
r
o
m
W
S
D
O
T
-
2
0
0
5
)
24
S
t
r
a
n
d
s
–
P
W
A
t
o
2
3
8
th
Ci
t
y
b
u
i
l
t
(
2
0
0
6
)
Ci
t
y
O
w
n
e
d
Fi
b
e
r
A
s
s
e
t
s
Cl
o
s
e
-
u
p
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
36
3
of
39
3
`
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
U
s
e
s
◦
Ci
t
y
e
x
p
e
n
s
e
r
e
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
x
T-
1
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
◦
Lo
c
a
l
P
a
r
t
n
e
r
s
–
I
n
t
e
r
n
e
t
A
c
c
e
s
s
x
Ed
m
o
n
d
s
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
C
o
l
l
e
g
e
x
St
e
v
e
n
s
H
o
s
p
i
t
a
l
x
Ed
m
o
n
d
s
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
(
d
e
l
a
y
e
d
)
x
Ci
t
y
o
f
L
y
n
n
w
o
o
d
(
v
i
a
N
e
t
R
i
v
e
r
)
6
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
36
4
of
39
3
`
Ne
a
r
T
e
r
m
p
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
F
u
t
u
r
e
U
s
e
s
◦
Ex
p
a
n
d
e
d
C
i
t
y
u
s
e
x
Wi
r
e
l
e
s
s
w
a
t
e
r
m
e
t
e
r
r
e
a
d
i
n
g
x
Pu
b
l
i
c
S
a
f
e
t
y
o
f
f
i
c
e
r
s
r
e
m
o
t
e
w
i
r
e
l
e
s
s
a
c
c
e
s
s
x
Mu
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
w
o
r
k
e
r
s
r
e
m
o
t
e
w
i
r
e
l
e
s
s
a
c
c
e
s
s
◦
Ex
p
a
n
d
e
d
P
a
r
t
n
e
r
u
s
e
x
Po
r
t
o
f
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
x
St
a
t
e
I
n
t
e
r
G
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
N
e
t
w
o
r
k
(
I
G
N
)
h
u
b
x
SN
O
-
C
O
M
/
S
o
u
t
h
C
o
u
n
t
y
a
c
c
e
s
s
x
Mu
k
i
l
t
e
o
/
S
h
o
r
e
l
i
n
e
S
c
h
o
o
l
d
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
s
x
Co
u
n
t
y
S
t
a
t
e
a
n
d
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
a
g
e
n
c
i
e
s
.
x
PS
E
(
g
a
s
)
&
P
U
D
(
e
l
e
c
t
r
i
c
)
m
e
t
e
r
r
e
a
d
i
n
g
7
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
36
5
of
39
3
`
Lo
n
g
e
r
T
e
r
m
F
u
t
u
r
e
U
s
e
s
◦
Co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
C
o
n
t
e
n
t
P
r
o
v
i
d
e
r
s
(
H
o
m
e
a
n
d
S
M
B
)
x
Co
m
c
a
s
t
x
Ti
m
e
W
a
r
n
e
r
x
Co
x
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
x
Cl
e
a
r
W
i
r
e
x
Mi
c
r
o
s
o
f
t
x
Ve
r
i
z
o
n
*
◦
Co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
I
n
t
e
r
n
e
t
A
c
c
e
s
s
x
Ec
o
n
o
m
i
c
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
m
a
g
n
e
t
8
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
36
6
of
39
3
In
c
r
e
m
e
n
t
a
l
g
r
o
w
t
h
,
n
o
t
“
B
i
g
B
a
n
g
”
.
`
Co
n
t
i
n
u
e
t
o
e
x
p
a
n
d
C
i
t
y
a
n
d
P
a
r
t
n
e
r
u
s
a
g
e
◦
Re
p
l
a
c
e
m
o
r
e
T
-
1
’
s
a
n
d
w
i
r
e
l
e
s
s
m
e
t
e
r
r
e
a
d
i
n
g
◦
Ex
p
a
n
d
p
a
r
t
n
e
r
b
a
s
e
o
u
t
s
i
d
e
C
i
t
y
l
i
m
i
t
s
x
Pa
r
t
n
e
r
s
p
a
y
f
o
r
i
n
c
r
e
m
e
n
t
a
l
e
x
p
a
n
s
i
o
n
a
n
d
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
op
e
r
a
t
i
n
g
r
e
v
e
n
u
e
`
Fa
c
i
l
i
t
a
t
e
n
e
t
w
o
r
k
g
r
o
w
t
h
w
i
t
h
o
t
h
e
r
p
u
b
l
i
c
wo
r
k
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
◦
Ol
y
m
p
i
c
V
i
e
w
D
r
i
v
e
c
o
n
d
u
i
t
e
x
a
m
p
l
e
9
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
36
7
of
39
3
Th
e
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
v
i
s
i
o
n
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
s
:
`
(5
)
r
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
n
o
d
e
s
(
f
o
o
t
p
r
i
n
t
s
)
◦
(3
)
“
S
u
p
e
r
”
n
o
d
e
s
(
H
u
b
s
)
◦
(2
)
N
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
n
o
d
e
s
(
C
a
b
i
n
e
t
s
)
`
Al
l
n
o
d
e
s
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
e
d
t
o
a
f
i
b
e
r
“
r
i
n
g
”
◦
Ri
n
g
d
e
s
i
g
n
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
s
d
u
a
l
r
o
u
t
e
r
e
d
u
n
d
a
n
c
y
`
Ho
m
e
s
a
n
d
b
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
e
s
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
e
d
t
o
a
n
o
d
e
vi
a
d
e
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
“
a
c
c
e
s
s
f
i
b
e
r
”
10
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
36
8
of
39
3
11
Ed
m
o
n
d
s
F
i
b
e
r
Ne
t
w
o
r
k
Ne
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
N
o
d
e
Ma
p
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
36
9
of
39
3
12
Ed
m
o
n
d
s
F
i
b
e
r
Ne
t
w
o
r
k
Ne
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
No
d
e
M
a
p
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
37
0
of
39
3
In
c
r
e
m
e
n
t
a
l
S
t
e
p
s
`
Id
e
n
t
i
f
y
N
o
d
e
L
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
(C
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
)
`
In
t
e
r
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
t
h
e
n
o
d
e
s
(2
o
f
4
r
e
a
d
y
n
o
w
)
`
Re
c
r
u
i
t
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
P
r
o
v
i
d
e
r
s
`
Al
l
o
w
n
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
s
t
o
s
e
l
f
s
e
l
e
c
t
◦
60
%
c
o
m
m
i
t
m
e
n
t
t
o
h
o
o
k
-
u
p
◦
Co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
b
e
g
i
n
s
`
Co
n
t
i
n
u
e
u
n
t
i
l
c
o
v
e
r
a
g
e
i
s
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
13
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
37
1
of
39
3
Po
l
i
c
y
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
`
Ad
o
p
t
P
o
l
i
c
y
r
e
q
u
i
r
i
n
g
c
o
n
d
u
i
t
i
n
s
t
a
l
l
a
t
i
o
n
du
r
i
n
g
m
a
j
o
r
r
o
a
d
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
/
r
e
p
a
i
r
`
Ad
o
p
t
P
o
l
i
c
y
r
e
q
u
i
r
i
n
g
n
e
w
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
s
t
o
in
s
t
a
l
l
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
c
o
n
d
u
i
t
.
`
Re
v
i
e
w
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
/
e
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
s
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
s
pe
r
t
a
i
n
i
n
g
t
o
u
n
d
e
r
g
r
o
u
n
d
f
i
b
e
r
.
◦
Ne
w
t
e
c
h
n
o
l
o
g
y
a
l
l
o
w
s
m
i
n
i
m
a
l
l
y
i
n
v
a
s
i
v
e
in
s
t
a
l
l
a
t
i
o
n
a
t
3
0
%
o
f
c
o
s
t
.
14
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
37
2
of
39
3
`
Ap
p
r
o
v
e
w
a
t
e
r
m
e
t
e
r
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
p
r
o
p
o
s
a
l
wi
t
h
w
i
r
e
l
e
s
s
m
e
t
e
r
r
e
a
d
i
n
g
p
a
c
k
a
g
e
.
`
Di
r
e
c
t
S
t
a
f
f
t
o
s
e
e
k
g
r
a
n
t
f
u
n
d
i
n
g
f
o
r
a
do
w
n
t
o
w
n
p
i
l
o
t
i
n
s
t
a
l
l
a
t
i
o
n
(
s
)
a
n
d
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
Te
c
h
n
o
l
o
g
y
S
h
o
w
c
a
s
e
(F
r
a
n
c
i
s
A
n
d
e
r
s
o
n
C
e
n
t
e
r
)
`
Di
r
e
c
t
S
t
a
f
f
t
o
u
p
d
a
t
e
t
h
e
c
o
n
s
u
l
t
a
n
t
s
fi
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
u
m
m
a
r
y
t
o
r
e
f
l
e
c
t
P
E
G
r
e
v
e
n
u
e
so
u
r
c
e
s
.
15
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
37
3
of
39
3
16
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
37
4
of
39
3
Memo
To: Edmonds City Council Members
From: Rick Jenness, Fiber Project Director
CC: Mayor Haakenson, CTAC Committee Members
Date: 6/12/2009
Re: Fiber Project Costs and Benefits
Introduction
As you work through the serious budgetary issues facing Edmonds in 2009-2010 and beyond, it’s easy
to imagine the Fiber Optic Network project falling towards the bottom of the City’s spending priority list.
The purpose of this memo is to summarize the real and substantive benefits the City can receive by
allowing the very modest expansion of the existing network that is planned for 2009 – 2010. When
these benefits are compared to the modest cash outlays planned for the next biennium, I think you will
conclude that maintaining the project funding is a wise and prudent use of the City’s resources both in
the short and long term.
It’s All about Revenue
I have made numerous presentations to the council and other public audiences that have focused on
the long term economic development benefits and improved citizen services that will accrue once the
City achieves the goal put forward by the CTAC of connecting every home and business to a City
owned, shared fiber optic network. But to be clear, the primary driver for starting and operating
telecommunications enterprise in the City is increasing General Fund Revenue. It was the driver back
in 2002 when I made my first presentation to the Mayor on the subject, and it remains the core driver
today.
Here are a few quick facts about revenue from the fiber network:
The City will receive, on average, $20,000 of revenue per year per (Educational and
Government) customer we connect to the Internet via the City’s network. We have signed
agreements with three institutions now, with an estimated of 30 -35 more potential Educational
and Government customers. That represents $700,000 in potential (on-going) revenue from
1
Packet Page 375 of 393
Page 2
these established institutions. Realistically, we are expecting to connect 5 to10 additional
customers in 2009 – 2010 ($160,000 - $260,000) if funding for the project is maintained.
The direct cost of providing service to these customers is essentially a flat fee of approximately
$35,000 per year. That is the wholesale cost of internet access over the network we own. We
are in the process of negotiating a better rate on this contract, but at the current rate with only
two customers, the enterprise is cash flow positive. Virtually all revenue after the 2nd
customer becomes operating surplus.
If we compare fiber revenue to sales tax revenue, one fiber customer generates the same net
revenue to the City as a business that transacts $2,000,000 in retail sales within the City limits.
Revenue from fiber customers is not limited to the City’s boundaries, but can be drawn from
anywhere in South Snohomish / North King County.
What are the other costs of the project
In the Mayor’s preliminary budget, I forecasted $197,200 in expenditures for 2009, and $113,600 in
expenditures for 2010 both of which include the flat cost internet access charge discussed above. Also
include in those numbers are expenditures to connect Edmonds Community College and Stevens
Hospital to the network. Both EDCC and Stevens have agreed to repay the city for these costs over 3-
5 years including interest. Repayment of these capital costs is in addition to the above revenue which
is somewhat confusing in the budget format being presented. The only other major costs are for
professional fees equally split between the Program Director (me), and legal fees paid to our bond
counsel. The Program Director costs should be considered on-going, but the legal fees will drop off in
2010.
Expanding the Customer Base
[Reference to Executive session legal advise redacted for the public packet] We have
budgeted $75,000 for legal fees to gain that clarification, the upside being a large expansion of our
potential customer base.
Our estimates are that an additional 100-300 enterprises could become customers with a potential of
generating $2 - $4,000,000 in new, on-going annual revenue. Some expansion of the network would
be required to scale the network to accommodate these customers, but would come only after we
receive legal clarification. We feel that no significant expansion would be required until after 2010, but
the $75,000 is required in this budget in order to create that future opportunity.
Conclusion
The original budget proposed by the Mayor has built into it the modest expectation that we would be
able to add 5-10 new customers per year to the network over the 2009-2010 biennium. With any luck,
the Fiber Project could be generating positive cash flow by the end of 2009, but most certainly by the
end of 2010. With the financial uncertainty facing the City of Edmonds, and all Government institutions
now and in the coming years, developing new and stable revenue sources should be one of the City’s
highest priorities. On behalf the CTAC committee and the current and future citizens of Edmonds, I
encourage you to approve the modest investments presented in our budget proposal so that his new
and substantial revenue source can be fully and rapidly developed.
Packet Page 376 of 393
{WSS684832.DOC;1/00006.900000/}
Page 1 of 6
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into between the City of Edmonds,
hereinafter referred to as the “City”, and Procom System, Inc., d/b/a Procom System
Integration Solutions, hereinafter referred to as the “Consultant”;
WHEREAS, the City desires to engage the professional services and assistance
of a consultant to provide technical assistance in the development and evolution of a fiber
optic network as set forth in the attached Statement(s) of Work, Exhibit(s) A hereto; and
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of mutual benefits accruing, it is agreed
by and between the Parties hereto as follows:
1. Statement of Work. A Statement of Work shall include all services and material
necessary to accomplish the above-mentioned objectives in accordance with the specifics
noted below.
A. General Description. At the request of City staff, the Consultant
will provide strategic consulting, project management, technical
architecture, assistance with business development, ongoing customer
service, and other services not described in the Statement of Work as
directed by the City’s representative.
The initial Statement of Work can be found in Exhibit A., incorporated by
this reference as fully as if herein set forth. Additional Statements of
Work may be incorporated into this agreement from time to time by this
reference as fully as if herein set forth upon mutual agreement by City and
Consultant.
B. Authorization Required. In conjunction with the City staff, the
Consultant will prepare Statements of Work for approval by the City’s
representative or his designee. All services performed pursuant to this
Agreement shall be consistent with an approved Statements of Work.
Each and every task billed under this Agreement shall be subject to the
requirement that it be authorized by the City. Such authorization shall be
written and may be documented by e-mail.
2. Payments. The Consultant shall be paid by the City for completed work for
services rendered under this Agreement as provided hereinafter. Such payment shall be
full compensation for work performed or services rendered and for all labor, materials,
supplies, equipment and incidentals necessary to complete the work.
A. Amount. Payment for work accomplished under the terms of this
Agreement shall be as set forth in the Statement of Work and the
authorization provided under paragraph 1(B) above, provided that in no
Packet Page 377 of 393
{WSS684832.DOC;1/00006.900000/}
Page 2 of 6
event shall the payment for work performed pursuant to this Agreement
exceed the sum of $75,000 for any calendar year.
B. Payment Approval. All vouchers shall be submitted by the
Consultant to the City for payment pursuant to the terms of this
Agreement. The City shall pay the appropriate amount for each voucher
to the Consultant. The Consultant may submit vouchers to the City semi -
monthly or monthly during the progress of the work for payment of
completed phases of the project. Billings shall be reviewed in conjunction
with the City's warrant process. No billing shall be considered for
payment that has not been submitted to the Finance Director three (3) days
prior to the scheduled cut-off date. Such late vouchers will be checked by
the City and payment will be made in the next regular payment cycle.
C. Record Retention. The costs, records and accounts pertaining to
this Agreement are to be kept available for inspection by representatives
of the City for a period of three (3) years after final payment. Copies shall
be made available upon request.
3. Ownership and Use of Documents. All research, tests, surveys, preliminary
data and any and all other work product prepared or gathered by the Consultant in
preparation for the services rendered by the Consultant under this Agreement shall be and
are the property of Consultant and shall not be considered public records, provided,
however, that:
A. Final Document. All final reports, presentations and testimony
prepared by the Consultant shall become the property of the City upon
their presentation to and acceptance by the City and shall at that date
become public records.
B. Copies. The City shall have the right, upon reasonable request, to
inspect, review and, subject to the approval of the Consultant, copy any
work product.
C. Default. In the event that the Consultant shall default on this
Agreement, or in the event that this contract shall be terminated prior to its
completion as herein provided, the work product of the Consultant, along
with a summary of work done to date of default or termination, shall
become the property of the City and tender of the work product and
summary shall be a prerequisite to final payment under this contract. The
summary of work done shall be prepared at no additional cost.
4. Hold Harmless Agreement. In performing the work under this contract,
Consultant agrees to protect, indemnify and save the City harmless from and against any
and all injury or damage to the City or its property, and also from and against all claims,
Packet Page 378 of 393
{WSS684832.DOC;1/00006.900000/}
Page 3 of 6
demands, and cause of action of every kind and character arising directly or indirectly, or
in any way incident to, in connection with, or arising out of negligent work performed
under the terms hereof, caused by the fault of the Consultant, its agent, employees,
representatives or subcontractors.
Consultant specifically promises to indemnify the City against claims or suits brought
under Title 51 RCW by its employees or subcontractors and waives any immunity that
the Consultant may have under that title with respect to, but only to, the City. Consultant
further agrees to fully indemnify City from and against any and all costs of defending any
such claim or demand to the end that the City is held harmless therefrom. This paragraph
shall not apply to damages or claims resulting from the sole negligence of the City.
5. General and Professional Liability Insurance. The Consultant shall secure and
maintain in full force and effect during performance of all work pursuant to his contract a
policy of business general liability insurance providing coverage of at least $1,000,000
per occurrence and $2,000,000 aggregate for personal injury; and $1,000,000 per
occurrence and aggregate for property damage. Certificates of coverage shall be
delivered to the City within fifteen (15) days of execution of this Agreement. Coverage
limit provided herein is neither intended nor shall it cap Consultant’s liability resulting
from breach of contract, warranty, negligence or any other act of tort.
6. Discrimination Prohibited. Consultant shall not discriminate against any
employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, age, sex, national
origin or physical handicap.
7. Consultant is an Independent Contractor. The Parties intend that an
independent Contractor relationship will be created by this Agreement. No agent,
employee or representative of the Consultant shall be deemed to be an agent, employee or
representative of the City for any purpose. Consultant shall be solely responsible for all
acts of its agents, employees, representatives and subcontractors during the performance
of this contract.
8. City Approval of Work and Relationships. Notwithstanding the Consultant’s
status as an independent Contractor, results of the work performed pursuant to this
contract must meet the approval of the City. During pendency of this Agreement, the
Consultant shall not perform work for any party with respect to any property located
within the City or for any project subject to the administrative or quasi-judicial review of
the City without written notification to the City and the City’s prior written consent.
9. Termination. This being an Agreement for professional services, either party
may terminate this Agreement for any reason upon giving the other party written notice
of such termination no fewer than ten (10) days in advance of the effective date of said
termination.
10. Changes/Additional Work. The City may engage Consultant to perform
services in addition to those listed in this Agreement, and Consultant will be entitled to
Packet Page 379 of 393
{WSS684832.DOC;1/00006.900000/}
Page 4 of 6
additional compensation for authorized additional services or materials. All such
authorizations shall comply with paragraph 1(B) above. The City shall not be liable for
additional compensation until and unless any and all additional work and compensation is
approved in advance in writing and signed by both Parties to this Agreement. If
conditions are encountered which are not anticipated in the Statement of Work, the City
understands that a revision to the Statement of Work and fees may be required. Provided,
however, that nothing in this paragraph shall be interpreted to obligate the Consultant to
render or the City to pay for services rendered in excess of the payments discussed in
Section 2.A, unless or until an amendment to this Agreement is approved in writing by
both Parties.
11. Standard of Care. Consultant represents that Consultant has the necessary
knowledge, skill and experience to perform services required by this Agreement.
Consultant and any persons employed by Consultant shall use their best efforts to
perform the work in a professional manner consistent with sound practices, in accordance
with the usual and customary professional care required for services of the type described
in the Statement of Work.
12. Non-waiver. Waiver by the City of any provision of this Agreement or any time
limitation provided for in this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other
provision.
13. Non-assignable. The services to be provided by the Contractor shall not be
assigned or subcontracted without the express written consent of the City.
14. Covenant Against Contingent Fees. The Consultant warrants that he has not
employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working
solely for the Consultant, to solicit or secure this contract, and that he has not paid or
agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for
the Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gifts or any other
consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award of making this contract. For
breach or violation of this warranty, the City shall have the right to annul this contract
without liability or, in its discretion to deduct from the contract price or consideration, or
otherwise recover, the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee,
gift, or contingent fee.
15. Compliance with Laws. The Consultant in the performance of this Agreement
shall comply with all applicable Federal, State or local laws and ordinances, including
regulations for licensing, certification and operation of facilities, programs and
accreditation, and licensing of individuals, and any other standards or criteria as
described in the Agreement to assure quality of services. The Consultant specifically
agrees to obtain a business license during and for any period in which services are
provided under this Agreement.
16. Notices. Notices shall be sent to the following address, with receipt of any notice
being deemed effective three days after deposit of written notice.
Packet Page 380 of 393
{WSS684832.DOC;1/00006.900000/}
Page 5 of 6
City Consultant
Gary Haakenson Rick Jenness
Mayor PROCOM SYSTEM INTEGRATION
City of Edmonds SOLUTIONS
121 Fifth Avenue North 17316 73rd Avenue West
Edmonds, WA 98020 Edmonds, WA 98206-5111
425-771-0251 206-529-4488
haakenson@ci.edmonds.wa.us rick@procom-sis.com
17. Severability. This Agreement shall be read and interpreted as a whole, except
that the capitalized and underlined headings for each numbered paragraph are for
descriptive purposes and shall not prevail over the provision which they head. In the
event that any provision herein shall be struck down, particularly those contained in
paragraph 7 (Consultant is an independent Contractor), this Agreement shall be at an
immediate end.
18. Integration. The Agreement between the Parties shall consist of this document
and the Exhibits attached hereto. These writings constitute the entire Agreement of the
parties and shall not be amended except by a writing executed by both parties as provided
in paragraph 10 (Changes/Additional Work). In the event of any conflict between this
written Agreement and any provisions of Exhibits attached hereto, this Agreement shall
control.
19. Venue and Jurisdiction. Any action to interpret or enforce this Agreement shall
be brought before the Superior Court of Snohomish County, Washington, and the Parties
agree that, as between them, all matters shall be resolved in that venue.
Packet Page 381 of 393
{WSS684832.DOC;1/00006.900000/}
Page 6 of 6
DATED THIS ________ DAY OF _____________________, 20____.
CITY OF EDMONDS
Mayor Gary Haakenson
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED:
By:
Sandra S. Chase, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By:
W. Scott Snyder, City Attorney
CONSULTANT:
PROCOM INDUSTRIES, INC.
d/b/a
PROCOM SYSTEM INTEGRATION SOLUTIONS
By:
R.G. (Rick) Jenness, President
On: 02-01-2009
Packet Page 382 of 393
Page 1 of 2
EXHIBIT A
Sub Contractor - Procom
Statement of Work
Statement of Work Number
2008-01
Statement of Work Date
August 1st, 2008
Contractor
Procom System Integration Solutions
Project name
City Edmonds Fiber Network
Statement of Work Reference
Technical Consulting & Project Management Services
The following sections outline the specific activities, duration, compensation and
other terms related to work to be performed by Contractor on the above named
Project.
Except as may be specifically provided herein, all work associated with this project
shall be governed by the Professional Services Master Agreement (PSMA) between
Procom and the City of Edmonds. Acceptance by both parties shall incorporate this
Work Order into the MSCA by reference.
Activities
Contractor will provide the services of Rick Jenness on a time and
materials basis to deliver strategic consulting, project management, and
technical architecture and other services as may be requested by the City.
Specific tasks shall include:
• Providing project management services for all customer connection
activities including customer engineering, fiber installation projects
and projects related to expanding or enhancing the Edmonds Fiber
Network (EFN) infrastructure
• Develop, refine and present the EFN strategic plan to the City Council
and the Mayor.
• Develop and maintain a forward looking financial budget for the EFN
that tracks both investments and revenue expected.
• Develop an overall communications plan for the EFN to articulate its
unique attributes to citizens and business entities in Edmonds and
surrounding areas.
Duration
Services described in this Statement of Work will begin August 1st, 2008
and will conclude on December 31st, 2009.
Packet Page 383 of 393
EXHIBIT A
Sub Contractor - Procom
Statement of Work
(Continued)
Page 2 of 2
Compensation
The Contractor will be compensated as follows:
• $135 for each hour worked measured in 15 minute intervals.
• Vehicle mileage costs will be reimbursed at the standard IRS
mileage rate per mile driven in support of the project.
• Out of pocket incidental expenses will be pre-approved by the City
and billed without mark-up accompanied by a receipt.
• Invoices and supporting documentation will be forwarded to the
client point of contact monthly or semi-monthly for payment in the
following warrant cycle.
Project Point of Contact
Contractor shall send all deliverables, status reports and invoices to the
individual(s) listed below:
• Gary Haakenson – Mayor haakenson@ci.edmonds.wa.us
Intellectual Property
All work product related to this project will be governed by the terms of the
Professional Services Master Agreement (PSMA) between Procom and the City of
Edmonds. Any exceptions to that clause are described below.
NONE
Acceptance
City of Edmonds Procom System Integration Solutions
By: Gary Haakenson By: R.G. (Rick) Jenness
Title: Mayor Title: President
Signed: Signed:
Date: Date:
Packet Page 384 of 393
EXHIBIT A
Sub Contractor - Procom
Statement of Work
Page 1 of 3
Statement of Work Number
2009-02
Statement of Work Date
February 1st, 2009
Contractor
Procom System Integration Solutions
Project name
City Edmonds Fiber Network
Statement of Work Reference
Business Development & Customer Engineering
Assistance
The following sections outline the specific activities, duration, compensation and
other terms related to work to be performed by Contractor on the above named
Project.
Except as may be specifically provided herein, all work associated with this project
shall be governed by the Professional Services Master Agreement (PSMA) between
Procom and the City of Edmonds. Acceptance by both parties shall incorporate this
Work Order into the MSCA by reference.
Activities
Contractor will provide the services of Rick Jenness on a time and
materials basis to assist the City in promoting the use of its fiber Optic with
other Public, Educational & Governmental (PEG) entities. Activities will
include:
• Identifying possible PEG customers
• Initiating contact with appropriate PEG customer officials helping
them determine the feasibility of connecting to the Edmonds Fiber
Network
• Assisting PEG Customers with preliminary engineering tasks
• Negotiating service contracts
Duration
Services described in this Statement of Work will begin Feb 1st, 2009 and
will conclude on December 31st, 2010.
Compensation
The Contractor will be compensated as follows:
• $135 for each hour worked measured in 15 minute intervals.
• Vehicle mileage costs will be reimbursed at the then in effect
standard IRS mileage rate per mile driven in support of the project.
Packet Page 385 of 393
EXHIBIT A
Sub Contractor - Procom
Statement of Work
(Continued)
Page 2 of 3
• Out of pocket incidental expenses will be pre-approved by the City
and billed without mark-up accompanied by a receipt.
• Invoices and supporting documentation will be forwarded to the
client point of contact monthly or semi-monthly for payment in the
following warrant cycle.
Project Point of Contact
Contractor shall send all deliverables, status reports and invoices to the
individual(s) listed below:
• Gary Haakenson – Mayor haakenson@ci.edmonds.wa.us
Intellectual Property
All work product related to this project will be governed by the terms of the
Professional Services Master Agreement (PSMA) between Procom and the City of
Edmonds. Any exceptions to that clause are described below.
NONE
Packet Page 386 of 393
EXHIBIT A
Sub Contractor - Procom
Statement of Work
(Continued)
Page 3 of 3
Acceptance
City of Edmonds Procom System Integration Solutions
By: Gary Haakenson By: R.G. (Rick) Jenness
Title: Mayor Title: President
Signed: Signed:
Date: Date: 02/01/2009
Packet Page 387 of 393
AM-2335 10.
Report on City Council Committee Meetings of June 9, 2009
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:06/16/2009
Submitted By:Sandy Chase, City Clerk's Office Time:15 Minutes
Department:City Clerk's Office Type:Information
Review Committee:
Committee Action:
Information
Subject Title
Report on City Council Committtee Meetings of June 9, 2009.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
N/A
Previous Council Action
N/A
Narrative
Attached are copies of the following City Council Committee Meeting Minutes:
•06-09-09 Community Services/Development Services Committee Meeting
•06-09-09 Finance Committee Meeting
•06-09-09 Public Safety Committee Meeting
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: 06-09-09 CSDS Committee
Link: 06-09-09 Finance Committee
Link: 06-09-09 Public Safety Committee
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 06/11/2009 10:54 AM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 06/11/2009 11:17 AM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 06/11/2009 11:41 AM APRV
Form Started By: Sandy
Chase
Started On: 06/10/2009 03:46
PM
Final Approval Date: 06/11/2009
Packet Page 388 of 393
D R A F T M I N U T E S
Community Service/Development Services Committee Meeting
June 9, 2009
Elected Officials Present: Staff Present:
Peggy Pritchard-Olson, Council member Rob Chave, Planning Manager
Dave Orvis, Chair Ann Bullis, Building Official
Jen Machuga, Planning
Jerry Shuster, Engineering
Rob English, City Engineer
Mike Thies, Code Enforcement Officer
The committee convened at 6:00 p.m.
A. Status of request by Carla Elder concerning a home addition initially started under County
permits.
Planner Jen Machuga explained that Ms. Elder and her husband obtained permits from
Snohomish County in 1993 to construct an addition to their home. Ms. Elder’s husband
began the work, but fell ill and passed away before being able to complete the interior
portion of the addition. The property was annexed into the City of Edmonds in 1995, and
the Elder’s building permit subsequently expired without the work being completed or
inspected. Per the Annexation Agreement, if a County permit expires after annexation, all
vesting is lost, and a new permit must be obtained from the City which meets current
adopted codes. The addition was built in compliance with the County’s setback
requirements; but it does not meet current City setback requirements.
Bio Park, City Attorney, noted that the county had not complied fully with the interlocal
agreement when the area was annexed by not informing the city of outstanding permits
such as the one in question here.
Staff discussed potential options with the Council Committee, including a variance, lot line
adjustment, removing a portion of the addition, and adopting an ordinance amending the
City’s nonconforming regulations (ECDC 17.40). Mr. Park noted that the Council could also
adopt an interim zoning ordinance providing specific relief in a well-defined situation such as
this.
The Committee agreed that the best option appeared to be the interim ordinance approach
suggested by Mr. Park.
ACTION: The Council Committee requested that Mr. Park and staff craft an interim zoning
ordinance to bring before the City Council.
B. Landmark Tree Ordinance.
This item was deferred.
ACTION: N/A.
Packet Page 389 of 393
CS/DS Committee Minutes
June 9, 2009
Page 2
2
C. Update of the Stormwater Code (ECDC 18.30) and the Illicit Discharge Code (EMC 7.200).
Jerry Shuster, Stormwater Engineering Program Manager and Mark Ewbank, from Herrera
Environmental Consultants presented a brief description of the updates to the two code chapters.
Both are required by the Western Washington Phase II Municipal Stormwater Permit ( issued in
2007 by the State Department of Ecology to the 80+ cities covered by the permit) to be adopted by
August of this year. In response to a question, Mr. Shuster with help from Mr. Ewbank explained an
illicit discharge is primarily anything that goes in the City's storm drainage system that is not rain
water, snow melt, or otherwise exempt as described in the permit, such as water from a footing drain
and discharges form emergency fire fighting activities.
Regarding the stormwater code update, Mr. Orvis asked if there will be more choices for
homeowners that are remodeling or redeveloping their property. Mr. Shuster explained that there
will be a new menu of best management practices that will include a toolbox of low impact
development techniques for all developments.
Next steps include legal review of the code changes and bringing them to the full Council in a study
session, with adoption scheduled to take place in August 2009.
No Action was required by committee (this was an informational item only).
ACTION: None necessary.
D. Ordinance amending the provisions of ECC 6.20.040 to clarify where junk vehicles may be
stored; ECDC 17.60.040 Vehicles in Residential Zones, Subsections (A) and (B) to clarify
several scrivener's errors.
Code Enforcement Officer Mike Thies introduced this item by explaining that minor corrections were
needed to assure that the recently approved ordinances updating the property performance
standards and public nuisance sections of the city code were mutually consistent. Mr. Thies
reviewed the changes in the marked up code sections with the Committee.
The Committee concurred that the changes were appropriate and would not change the meaning of
the adopted ordinances.
ACTION: The Committee voted to forward the ordinance to the full Council for Consent approval.
The Committee meeting adjourned at 6:32 p.m.
Packet Page 390 of 393
FINANCE COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES
June 9, 2009
6:00 PM
V:\WORDATA\FINANCE COMM MINUTES\06-09-09 FINANCE COMMITTEE.DOC
Present: Councilmember Wambolt
Councilmember Plunkett
Staff: Noel Miller
Kathleen Junglov
Public: Roger Hertrich
Diane Buckshnis
Councilmember Wambolt called the meeting to order at 6:00 PM.
Item A: Alderwood Water Supply Agreement negotiations update.
Noel Miller, Public Works Director, briefed the committee on the negotiations currently
underway with the Alderwood Water District regarding the long term water supply
contract for the City. Other parties in the negotiations include the Cities of Lynnwood
and Mountlake Terrace and the Mukilteo Water District. The current water supply
contract is set to expire in September, 2010. The City Attorney is currently reviewing the
contract. Staff will provide periodic updates to the committee which will include
briefings on the legal and financial impacts of the contract.
Item B: General Fund Report for the month ending May 31, 2009.
Kathleen Junglov briefly reviewed the revenue and expenditure trends of the General
Fund for month May 2009, as well as responded to questions on same. It was noted that
for the time being the General Fund activity is being monitored, but the forecast as of
April 7, 2009 remains the most current forecast. For information only, no further action
required.
Adjournment - The meeting was adjourned at 6:09 PM.
Packet Page 391 of 393
Public Safety Committee Meeting
June 9, 2009
Page 1 of 2
Minutes
Public Safety Committee Meeting
June 9, 2009
Committee Members Present: Council Member Strom Peterson, Chair
Council Member Steve Bernheim
Staff Present: Assistant Fire Chief Mark Correira
Guests: None
The meeting was called to order at 5:58 p.m.
A. RCW 35.103 Annual Compliance Report - 2008
AC Correira stated the 2008 compliance report is the third annual report made to the
Council and the public required by RCW 35.103, the recently codified Substitute House
Bill 1756 as the two previous compliance reports were titled. He reviewed the
information contained in the Public Safety Committee Agenda Memo (AM-2314) and
agenda memo attachment with emphasis on the crux of the report contained in Sections
3 and 4.
Of 11 Council-adopted response standard objectives in 2006, the 2008 data shows that
five were met, five were not (two less than in 2007), and one had no reportable incidents
to compare. In four of the five objectives where the response standard was not met, the
deficiency was between eight and 20 seconds. For the fifth unmet objective – Response
Time for the Deployment of Full, First Alarm Assignment to a Residential Fire
Suppression Incident (assembly of 15 personnel) – the 2 minute and 45 second
deficiency is due to the arrival of automatic aid units from other fire service jurisdictions,
which is beyond the control of the Edmonds Fire Department.
Section 4 of the report explains why the Council-adopted standards were not met, the
predictable consequences of failing to meet the adopted standards, and the steps
necessary to correct deficiencies in order to achieve compliance.
Action: Forward to the City Council Consent Agenda with a recommendation to
approve.
B. Update City Strategic Plan II. Council Public Safety Policy Statement II and
Objectives
AC Correira reviewed the information contained in the Public Safety Committee Agenda
Memo (AM-2318), briefly describing this item as a request to update the biennial dates in
the City Strategic Plan to 2009-2010 in Council Public Safety Policy Statement II.
Objectives A1 and D1-4 as indicated on the agenda memo attachment
Action: Forward to the City Council Consent Agenda with a recommendation to
approve.
Packet Page 392 of 393
Public Safety Committee Meeting
June 9, 2009
Page 2 of 2
C. End of Edmonds Fire Department Volunteer Program
AC Correira reviewed the information contained in the Public Safety Committee Agenda
Memo (AM-2315), briefly describing the history of Volunteers in the Edmonds Fire
Department since 1904, and the opportunity Edmonds Volunteers have to continue their
service to the larger community by affiliating with the Snohomish County Fire District #1
Volunteer Program effective September 30, 2009. The advantages of the District
program were described.
The City and Fire Department appreciate the dedicated service of the many, many
“Volunteers,” “Sleepers,” and “Reserves” who have served Edmonds citizens in one form
or another since 1904.
Action: Forward to the City Council Consent Agenda with a recommendation to
approve.
Meeting adjourned at 1818 hours.
Packet Page 393 of 393