2009.07.21 CC Agenda Packet
AGENDA
Edmonds City Council
Council Chambers, Public Safety Complex
250 5th Ave. North, Edmonds
______________________________________________________________
JULY 21, 2009
7:00 p.m.
Call to Order and Flag Salute
1. Approval of Agenda
2. Approval of Consent Agenda Items
A. Roll Call
B. AM-2395 Approval of City Council Meeting Minutes of July 7, 2009.
C. AM-2404 Approval of claim checks #112735 through #112922 dated July 9, 2009 for $322,062.87, and
claim checks #112923 through #113065 dated July 16, 2009 for $522,011.21. Approval of
payroll direct deposit and checks #48312 through #48378 for the pay period July 1 through
July 15, 2009 for $866,528.52.
D. AM-2384 Acknowledge receipt of a Claim for Damages from Jenny Jorgenson (amount undetermined).
E. AM-2387 Authorization for Mayor to sign a professional services agreement with CHS Engineers, LLC
for design services for the Sewer Lift Stations Rehabilitation Project.
F. AM-2402 Requesting authorization to salvage surplus and obsolete parts for Water and Wastewater
Divisions.
G. AM-2407 Proposed equipment rental hourly rates for external agencies. Proposed equipment rental
hourly rates for the Transportation Benefit District.
H. AM-2389 Ordinance designating the Ganahl – Hanley Log Cabin, located at 120 Fifth Avenue North,
Edmonds, Washington for inclusion on the Edmonds Register of Historic Places, and
directing the Community Services Director or his designee to designate the site on the
Official Zoning Map with an “HR” Designation.
3. AM-2394
(30 Minutes)
Presentation on Levy Option #2 by Council President Wilson and Councilmember
Bernheim.
4. AM-2403
(30 Minutes)
Resolution and final action on the 2009 Levy.
5. AM-2393
(10 Minutes)
Public hearing on the recommendation of the Historic Preservation Commission to
determine that the “Edmonds Bank” is eligible for placement on the Edmonds Register
of Historic Places. (Applicant: HPC / File No. HPC-09-8).
6. AM-2409 Public hearing on the Planning Board recommendation to approve the creation of a new
Packet Page 1 of 930
6. AM-2409
(30 Minutes)
Public hearing on the Planning Board recommendation to approve the creation of a new
mixed use zoning classification for Firdale Village to implement the Comprehensive
Plan. (File No. AMD-2008-10 / Applicant: Shapiro Architects)
7. AM-2350
(30 Minutes)
Presentation on the 2009 Comprehensive Transportation Plan.
8. AM-2408
(20 Minutes)
Discussion regarding 523 Alder Building.
9.Audience Comments (3 minute limit per person)*
*Regarding matters not listed on the Agenda as Closed record Review or as Public Hearings.
10. AM-2396
(10 Minutes)
Report on City Council Committee Meetings of July 14, 2009.
11. (5 Minutes)Mayor's Comments
12. (15 Minutes)Council Comments
Adjourn
Packet Page 2 of 930
AM-2395 2.B.
Approve 07-07-09 City Council Meeting Minutes
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:07/21/2009
Submitted By:Sandy Chase, City Clerk's Office Time:Consent
Department:City Clerk's Office Type:Action
Review Committee:
Committee Action:
Information
Subject Title
Approval of City Council Meeting Minutes of July 7, 2009.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
It is recommended that the City Council review and approve the draft minutes.
Previous Council Action
N/A
Narrative
Attached is a copy of the draft minutes.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: 07-07-09 Draft City Council Minutes
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 07/15/2009 09:43 AM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 07/15/2009 10:00 AM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 07/15/2009 03:07 PM APRV
Form Started By: Sandy
Chase
Started On: 07/15/2009 09:41
AM
Final Approval Date: 07/15/2009
Packet Page 3 of 930
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 7, 2009
Page 1
EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL DRAFT MINUTES
July 7, 2009
The Edmonds City Council meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Mayor Haakenson in the Council
Chambers, 250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds. The meeting was opened with the flag salute.
ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT
Gary Haakenson, Mayor
D. J. Wilson, Council President
Michael Plunkett, Councilmember
Peggy Pritchard Olson, Councilmember
Steve Bernheim, Councilmember
Dave Orvis, Councilmember
Ron Wambolt, Councilmember
Strom Peterson, Councilmember
STAFF PRESENT
Tom Tomberg, Fire Chief
Mark Correira, Assistant Fire Chief
Jim Lawless, Assistant Police Chief
Stephen Clifton, Community Services/Economic
Development Director
Brian McIntosh, Parks & Recreation Director
Noel Miller, Public Works Director
Rob English, City Engineer
Scott Snyder, City Attorney
Sandy Chase, City Clerk
Jana Spellman, Senior Executive Council Asst.
Jeannie Dines, Recorder
1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
COUNCILMEMBER WAMBOLT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT WILSON,
TO APPROVE THE AGENDA IN CONTENT AND ORDER. MOTION CARRIED
UNANIMOUSLY.
2. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS
COUNCILMEMBER WAMBOLT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT WILSON,
TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. The agenda
items approved are as follows:
A. ROLL CALL
B. APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF JUNE 23, 2009.
C. APPROVAL OF CLAIM CHECKS #112506 THROUGH 112605 DATED JUNE 25, 2009
FOR $278,463.57, AND #112606 THROUGH 112734 DATED JULY 2, 2009 FOR
$887,007.05. APPROVAL OF PAYROLL DIRECT DEPOSITS AND CHECKS #48238
THROUGH #48310 FOR THE PAY PERIOD JUNE 16 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2009 FOR
THE AMOUNT $897,566.66.
D. ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT OF CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES FROM STATE FARM
MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY ($2,086.84), PUGET SOUND
ENERGY ($5,973.72), ALLIED BUILDING PRODUCTS CORP. ($3,904.86), AND
ROBERT PRESTON ($98.55).
Packet Page 4 of 930
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 7, 2009
Page 2
E. APPROVAL TO SOLICIT BIDS FOR THE SOUTH COUNTY SENIOR CENTER MAIN
ENTRY REPAIR PROJECT.
F. AUTHORIZATION FOR MAYOR TO SIGN SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT #5 FOR
THE INTERURBAN TRAIL PROJECT.
G. RESOLUTION NO. 1202 IN SUPPORT OF CREATING A SNOHOMISH COUNTY
HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION.
3. PUBLIC HEARING ON THE APPLICATION FOR A CONCESSION AGREEMENT. THE
AGREEMENT IS FOR THE USE OF THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY IN ORDER TO PLACE A
TRAILER ON THE RIGHT-OF-WAY TO VEND FOOD AND BEVERAGES. THE SITE IS
LOCATED AT JAMES STREET IMMEDIATELY EAST OF THE FERRY HOLDING LANES
AND IS ADJACENT TO THE SR104 PARK. (APPLICANT: ANGELO NARCISO, WADE K.
KAHAIALII AND CYNDI AIONA COOK / SHORTS 'N SLIPPAS, LLC)
City Clerk Sandy Chase explained this is an application for a concession agreement with Shorts ‘N
Slippas. The applicant currently has a trailer on the City right-of-way at the end of James Street near the
ferry holding lanes where they serve food and beverages. They have been at this site since July 2008.
The applicant has requested renewal of the concession agreement for 2009-2010. She advised no
concerns had been raised with City staff during the past year with regard to this concession agreement. In
response to mailed, posted and published public hearing notices, two letters were received in the Council
office today and have been provided to the Council tonight.
Edmonds City Code Chapter 4.04, Concession Agreements, states concession agreements may be granted
at the sole discretion of the City Council. The City Attorney approved the proposed new concession
agreement which has been updated to reflect a 3% increase in the monthly lease amount as well as the
leasehold excise tax for a total monthly lease of $116.23. Staff recommends the Council approve the
concession agreement.
Councilmember Bernheim referred to comments in one of the letters regarding storage, observing the
concession agreement did not appear to address the premises’ conditions. City Attorney Scott Snyder
agreed it was not directly addressed in the agreement.
Councilmember Peterson asked whether the premises’ conditions would be addressed by the City Code.
Mr. Snyder responded Chapter 6.40 is generally applicable to all businesses and requires property and
business owners to clean up around their licensed premises. Civil penalties apply and it can be the basis
for business license revocation.
Mr. Snyder advised staff was in the process of proposing revisions to the City’s ordinance regarding
encroachment permits in response to recent public comment on the use of public rights-of-way and City
approval of encroachment permits as well as the fees for the rental/use of public rights-of-way via an
encroachment permit. This concession agreement is for undeveloped public right-of-way. In this
instance, the City is charging $116/month for rental of the space occupied by the 98 square foot trailer.
Staff’s research indicates this fee is similar to the amounts charged by adjacent communities.
Mayor Haakenson opened the public participation portion of the public hearing. He advised the Council
received a letter from Francis Knight who would like to have the trailer removed, and a letter from James
Lockhart who was pleased with the condition of the trailer. With regard to the comment in Mr.
Lockhart’s letter about a fruit and jerky vendor set up occasionally on the lawn of the park north of the
restrooms, Mayor Haakenson explained they were operating there illegally and they have been informed
Packet Page 5 of 930
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 7, 2009
Page 3
that was not permitted. There were no members of the public present who wished to provide testimony
and Mayor Haakenson closed the public hearing.
COUNCILMEMBER BERNHEIM MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER WAMBOLT,
TO APPROVE THE CONCESSION AGREEMENT.
Councilmember Bernheim commented this was an example of a revenue-generating use the Council
could encourage and suggested similar concessions be considered at the dog park, Senior Center, ferry
terminal or other locations throughout the City particularly during summer months. With regard to the
comments in the letter regarding the appearance of the premises, he suggested rather than legislating
standards for storage, the owner/operator be encouraged to respect neighbors and visitors and keep the
area around the trailer tidy to avoid addressing that issue in the concession agreement in the future. He
expressed support for approval of the concession agreement.
Councilmember Wambolt referred to the concern expressed by James Lockhart regarding the potential
proliferation of concessions, noting he had seen a truck selling food in the City recently. Ms. Chase
answered it was likely the truck had a solicitor’s license. Trucks that serve food out a window are
allowed to park in a private parking lot for a day with the permission of the property owner. Mayor
Haakenson clarified they were allowed only on private property, not on City property.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
4. CITIZENS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION - NOMINATION AND SELECTION
OF COMMISSION MEMBERS
Council President Wilson advised each Councilmember would appoint two members to the Commission
and Mayor Haakenson would appoint three members.
Councilmember Bernheim nominated Rebecca Wolfe and Evan Pierce.
Councilmember Wambolt nominated Marianne Burkhart and Bruce Witenberg.
Councilmember Peterson nominated Frank Yamamoto and Rob VanTassell.
Council President Wilson nominated Michael Bowman and David Schaefer.
Mayor Haakenson nominated Bruce Faires, Bill Vance and Kerry St. Clair Ayers.
Councilmember Plunkett nominated Rich Senderoff and Stacy Gardea.
Councilmember Orvis nominated Don Hall and Betty Larman.
Senior Executive Council Assistant Jana Spellman relayed Councilmember Olson’s nomination of Darrol
Haug and Beatrice O’Rourke.
COUNCIL PRESIDENT WILSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER WAMBOLT,
TO ACCEPT THE NOMINATIONS FOR THE CITIZENS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
COMMISSION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Community Services/Economic Development Director Stephen Clifton advised staff would contact the
people appointed to the Commission and he anticipated a meeting would be scheduled on July 16, 6:00 –
Packet Page 6 of 930
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 7, 2009
Page 4
8:00 p.m. A monthly meeting would be held thereafter through December 2010. He anticipated the
committee would nominate a Chair to lead the monthly meetings.
Council President Wilson advised this group would establish its rules based on the Council’s vision in the
ordinance establishing the Commission. He suggested Mayor Haakenson select a person to chair the first
1-2 meetings until a Chair could be elected by the members. It was the consensus of the council to allow
the Commission to select their own chairperson.
Councilmember Wambolt commented there were many good applicants for the Commission. To those
not selected, he assured it did not reflect the Council’s assessment of them, there were simply more
applicants than positions. He selected a representative from the Port due to the importance of economic
development to the Port and he also wanted a representative of the Highway 99 Taskforce on the
Commission.
5. AUDIENCE COMMENTS
George Murray, Edmonds, commented on a Fiddle Tunes camp in Port Townsend last week that
attracts 500-600 musicians and generates money for Port Townsend and suggested a similar event be held
in Edmonds. He noted the event had a “town” feeling, commenting on the difference between the use of
“city” and “town.” For example, small town atmosphere has a different meaning than small city
atmosphere. He preferred a small town attitude, a Town Council where the members knew each other
and who did not wear a suit to a meeting with friends. He thanked Elizabeth Scott for her comments last
week regarding the need for belt tightening. He was disappointed in Council President Wilson’s article in
the Edmonds Beacon that reiterated expenses are not a problem; emphasizing expenses were always a
problem and had to be watched carefully. He referred to UCLA Basketball Coach Wooden who begins
coaching freshmen players by teaching them to put on shoes and socks. He concluded that type of
continual attention to detail was necessary to keep expenses under control and if expenses were under
control, there would not be problems with revenue.
Pamela Van Swearingen, Edmonds, thanked the Council for passing the resolution submitted by
Council President Wilson supporting the creation of a Snohomish County Human Rights Commission.
She explained a citizen group has been working on this for approximately 2½ years. King County passed
a similar ordinance in the 1990s, Seattle’s ordinance has been in effect since the mid-1970’s, and both
Pierce County and Tacoma have Human Rights ordinances. She recognized Edmonds as the first city in
Snohomish County to express their support for the creation of a Snohomish County Human Rights
Commission. Further information was available at the citizen group’s website: www.SCCCHR.org.
Robert Rhine, Edmonds, was grateful the hostility and lack of respect exhibited by the Council two
weeks ago was not present tonight. He referred to the phrase “one nation under God” in the Pledge of
Alliance and the phrase “In God We Trust” on a $20 bill, and other laws taken from the Book of
Leviticus, asking City Attorney Scott Snyder about the separation of church and state. Mr. Snyder
offered to confer with him during a break.
Al Rutledge, Edmonds, referred to Edmonds’ ban on fireworks, noting a lot of fireworks were set off in
the unincorporated area on Hwy. 99. He recalled the City has attempted to annex this area three times in
the past and asked whether there were plans to annex the area in the future.
Dave Page, Edmonds, commented on newspaper headlines from the Reporter in the Florida Keyes
regarding incompetent employees, commenting that appeared to be the norm in that area but was very
damaging to the community’s reputation. He commented it was the City leaders who set the standards
that create a town’s reputation. He advised the approximately $4 million levy this November was a drop
Packet Page 7 of 930
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 7, 2009
Page 5
in the bucket for the privilege of living in a town like Edmonds. He expressed his appreciation for the
leadership the Council and City employees establish for citizens to follow. He pledged to work on
passage of the levy.
Rich Senderoff, Edmonds, commended the Council for approving the resolution supporting the creation
of a Snohomish County Human Rights Commission on the Consent Agenda. He noted resolutions that
reminded everyone of their basic rights and responsibilities and encouraging citizens to live by them were
beneficial to the community. He suggested Council President Wilson read the resolution during Council
comments. He was encouraged by the number and diversity of members on the Snohomish County
Citizens Commission for Human Rights who initiated this effort. In addition to citizens and local
politicians, labor, County Council, the County Executive, the County Prosecutor, the County Sheriff, U.S.
Department of Justice, Washington State Human Rights Commission, the faith community as well as
many immigrant and minority groups participated in this effort.
Idolina Reta, Deputy Director, Washington State Human Rights Commission, advised she was
informed by Ms. Van Swearingen that the City Council was considering a resolution in support of
forming a Snohomish County Human Rights Commission. She explained the Washington State Human
Rights Commission had been working with the citizens group for over a year on this effort and the group
is very passionate about the formation of a Snohomish County Human Rights Commission. She
commented on the limitations of the State Human Rights Commission, advising they have only 20
employees to investigate over 1200 complaints each year. She commended the Council for approving the
resolution.
Mark Hintz, a member of the citizens group, thanked Council President Wilson for bringing the
resolution to the Council for consideration and thanked the Council for approving the resolution. He
commented the time was right to form a Human Rights Commission in Snohomish County to protect
people from discrimination.
Diane Buckshnis, Edmonds, expressed concern there was no information available on the City’s website
regarding the Fire District 1 proposal related to the Edmonds Fire Department. She posed several
questions: why now in this difficult recession, how do citizens benefit, how will the City’s firefighters be
impacted, will the real estate be valued appropriately, and will the approximately $2.5 million income
stream the Fire Department provides be future-valued. She requested citizens be given sufficient
information at the time public hearings are held to allow them to provide their insight.
Roger Hertrich, Edmonds, expressed concern with the outdoor dining area in front of the business that
is adjacent to the theater that reduced the sidewalk area to less than 5 feet, forcing pedestrians to walk
single file next to the curb. It was his understanding a street use permit would allow tables/chairs, not a
fenced area. His research of the City’s code revealed the use must be temporary and items on the
sidewalk may encroach into a maximum of 2 feet of the public sidewalk; however, in this instance, the
fence appears to be permanently attached to the sidewalk and encroached 3 feet into the sidewalk. He
suggested Mayor Haakenson request the fenced-in area be removed. He did not object to outdoor dining
but wanted it to be reasonable.
6. DISCUSSION REGARDING FIRE DISTRICT 1 PROPOSAL RELATED TO THE EDMONDS
FIRE DEPARTMENT
Fire Chief Tom Tomberg recognized numerous Edmonds Fire Department and Fire District 1 employees
in the audience and introduced Fire District 1 Chief Ed Whiddis. He explained this was a status report on
negotiations on the contract for service proposal received from Fire District 1 to provide fire/EMS
services to the City of Edmonds.
Packet Page 8 of 930
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 7, 2009
Page 6
Chief Tomberg explained to date they have learned that a contract for service with Fire District 1 will do
the following:
• Ensure high quality fire/EMS service while reducing City costs.
• Continue operation of three, fully staffed fire stations.
• Replace automatic aid agreements with a formal contract for service.
• Enhance fire service operations as part of an 11 station Fire Department with a minimum of 41
personnel on duty 24/7.
• Enhance training, education and career opportunities for members of the Edmonds Fire
Department (EFD).
• Another step toward fire service regionalization with attendant efficiencies and effectiveness.
• Lighten the financial cost/daily workload of the remaining City workload with the transfer of 54
employees to Fire District 1.
• Address long term EFD needs for staffing, administrative headquarters, and a training facility.
• Contains a method for the Fire Department to return to the City should the transfer be
unworkable.
• Maintain responsiveness to elected officials and citizens through various required meetings,
reports, and checks in the agreement.
• Facilitates a City request for a fire insurance survey from the Washington Surveying & Rating
Bureau (last done in 1990), with a good chance fire insurance rates will decrease.
• The District has a track record of leadership and quality service delivery; Mountlake Terrace
Mayor, Mountlake Terrace City Manager, and Brier Mayor offered to answer any questions the
Council has about the service delivery they receive.
Chief Tomberg provided a history of the contract for service proposal:
• April 13, 2009 – Fire District 1 presented their proposal.
• April 16, 2009 – the proposal was sent to the Council.
• April 21, 2009 – Council authorized the Mayor and staff to negotiate the proposal with Fire
District 1.
• Multiple meetings have been held with fire administrations, labor groups, elected officials (Mayor
Haakenson and Councilmember Wambolt in Council President Wilson’s absence) and appointed
officials (Community Services/Economic Development Director Stephen Clifton and Finance
Director Kathleen Junglov).
• Close to having an action agenda item for Council consideration.
Chief Tomberg commented regionalizing fire service in South Snohomish County was not a new concept.
There have been at least 9 formal attempts since 1984 to merge, join, consolidate or offer contracts for
service to or in different combinations of Southwest Snohomish County fire/EMS agencies including
Brier, Edmonds, Fire District 1, Fire District 11, Lynnwood, Medic 7, Mountlake Terrace, Mukilteo
and/or Woodway. Successful efforts to date include the merging of Fire District 1 and Fire District 11 on
January 1, 2001 and Mountlake Terrace and Brier began receiving fire/EMS through a contract for service
with Fire District 1 on January 1, 2005.
He noted the service agreement that will be presented to the Council is modeled after Mountlake
Terrace’s 2005 agreement and the 1995-1996 Esperance agreement between the City and Fire District 1.
In 1995-1996, the City purchased Station 20 from Fire District 1 including the station, land, apparatus,
equipment, and transferred personnel from Fire District 1 as part of an Interlocal Agreement.
He cited other successful combinations including the following:
• Automatic Aid Agreements
Packet Page 9 of 930
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 7, 2009
Page 7
• National Incident Management System (NIMS) and Incident Command System (ICS)
• Snohomish County Technical Rescue Team
• Snohomish County Hazardous Materials Response Team
• SNOCOM 9-1-1 Dispatch
• ESCA Emergency Management
• Snohomish County Emergency Radio System (SERS) – 800 MHz
• E-911 Committee
• Medic 7 (1979-2003)
Chief Tomberg provided a profile of Fire District 1:
• 8 fire stations (serves Mountlake Terrace and Brier)
• 167 FTEs with a minimum of 29 personnel on duty 24/7
• Serve 150,000 people
• Their sole mission is full service provider of patient and citizen life and safety services.
• Currently building a 4-story training facility on a 2.5 acre site adjacent to their 40,000 square foot
headquarters. Edmonds has needed a Fire Department headquarters and training facility.
He identified additional services Fire District 1 provides:
• Training Division personnel (3)
• Training Facility
• EMS Officers (3)
• Safety Officer
• Public information
• Public education
• Offer adult, child and infant CPR
• Offer first aid training
• Offer bike/ski safety helmet program
• Offer a proactive school program
• Child passenger safety check program
• Senior citizen programs
• Honor Guard
• Volunteer Program
He identified Edmonds operating costs:
Program budget, 2009 Fire Staff Administered
(page 107 in the budget book)
$7,571,969
Other Fire Costs, 2009
Direct or partial
1,066,829
Overhead costs, 2008 401,040
Estimated Total $9,039,838
He provided a breakdown of Other Fire Costs:
Fire Station Debt Service for stations 16, 20 &
(part) 17
$ 356,957
Apparatus Replacement 212,289
Pension Transfer 46,624
*ESCA (part) 33,953
Packet Page 10 of 930
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 7, 2009
Page 8
*800 MHz Debt Service (part) 50,393
*LEOFF 1 Medical Transfer 116,991
*SNOCOM (part) 249,622
Total $1,066,829
*Anticipated ongoing City costs
Chief Tomberg provided a breakdown of Overhead Fire Costs 2008, services fire would no longer
require:
Payroll $ 6,572
Payables 4,074
Finance/Budget 12,456
Administration 75,895
Legislative 29,982
Legal 18,500
Human Resources 50,117
Insurance 45,820
Facilities/Grounds Maintenance 83,694
Technology 73,989
Total $ 401,040
He reviewed contract for service elements:
• Levels of service maintained and enhanced by Fire District 1 assets and resources.
• Improved training, education and career opportunities.
• Fire Marshal and Inspector, Fire District 1 employees, would maintain offices in Edmonds City
Hall. Fire District 1 does not have a Fire Marshal; Fire Marshal services in the unincorporated
area are provided by the Snohomish County Fire Marshal. The Fire Marshall and Inspector
would continue their responsibility for plans inspection, permits, etc. with revenue to the City.
• Station staffing unchanged.
• RCW 35.103 Plan the Council approved on June 16 regarding staffing/response times maintained
(improved).
• Criteria-based 9-1-1 dispatched employed by SNOCOM unchanged.
• Provides a 4-year lease-purchase of fire stations and land, prices established by WCIA appraiser
via building replacement value, plus 2009 Snohomish County Assessor land value, minus
depreciation.
• Payment model based on direct City fire station personnel costs and indirect overhead costs.
• Fire District 1 would provide Esperance service, negotiates with Woodway to assume contract for
service, reduces Edmonds annual payment based on serving Esperance and Woodway.
• Initial 2010 payment serves as the base amount for 2011 adjustment.
• Adjustments occur annually by comparable fire agencies median compensations, or CPI-W for
direct station labor cost plus indirect operating costs: 10% for administrative overhead, 10% for
stations and equipment, City pays 75% of Fire Marshal and Inspector, apparatus replacement
costs.
• District provides EMS transport, administers the program, collect fees, assume billing and
collection costs.
• City continues to conduct EMS levy, collect revenue.
• EFD employees become Fire District 1 employees, rank and seniority intact.
• No diminishment in wages, Fire District 1 benefit package applies.
• EFD labor immune from layoffs for five years.
• Labor impacts collectively bargained.
Packet Page 11 of 930
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 7, 2009
Page 9
• Accrued vacation and sick time hours transfer to Fire District 1, vacation and sick payout to Fire
District 1 based on formulas in the labor contracts and the City policy.
• Apparatus and vehicle accepted as-is, purchased lump sum, value determined by Fire Trucks
Plus, Kelly Blue Book, or acquisition cost, apparatus/vehicle replacement funds set aside to
replace those vehicles paid to Fire District 1.
• Equipment (on-board and from asset list) purchased lump sum as-is, City transfers equipment
replacement funds to Fire District 1.
• City retains public safety boat.
• City retains membership and financial responsibility for ESCA, SNOCOM, and SERS.
• City and Fire District 1 may contract for additional services.
• 20-year agreement, automatic renewal for 5 years.
• Definition of “material breach.”
• Conditional termination within first 5 years.
• If terminated, fire stations, land, apparatus and vehicles, equipment and personnel transfer back to
City – return process same as departure.
• Various legal sections regarding dispute resolution, etc.
• Required meetings and reports.
Chief Tomberg recapped the City’s responsibilities:
• Pay contract annually for fire/EMS service.
• Transfer 54 employees (once).
• Transfer accrued sick and vacation time (once).
• Payout of vacation time and a portion of sick time (once).
• Sell stations and land (4-year lease-purchase).
• Sell apparatus/vehicle (once).
• Pay apparatus/vehicle replacement funds (once).
• Sell equipment (once).
• Pay equipment replacement funds (once).
• EMS transport fees collected by Fire District 1 (ongoing).
• Esperance and Woodway service contracts to Fire District 1 (ongoing).
• Collect EMS levy revenue (annual).
• Collect plans, inspection, permit revenue (ongoing).
Chief Tomberg recapped Fire District 1 responsibilities:
• Paid for providing fire/EMS service.
• Receive transfer of 54 employees (once).
• Receive accrued sick and vacation time (once).
• Paid vacation time, portion of sick time (once).
• Lease-purchase station and land (over 4 years).
• Purchase apparatus/vehicles (once).
• Paid apparatus/vehicle replacement funds (once).
• Purchase equipment (once).
• Paid equipment replacement funds (once).
• Collect EMS transport fees (ongoing.)
• Provide service to Esperance and Woodway (ongoing).
Chief Tomberg reviewed next steps:
• Draft sent to City Attorney on July 2.
Packet Page 12 of 930
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 7, 2009
Page 10
• Meeting between elected, appoints, fire administration and labor at Edmonds City Hall on July 8.
• Draft contract and exhibits turned over to Mayor and negotiating team.
• Mayor and team negotiate with Fire District 1.
• Final review by City Attorney.
• Submission to Council for action.
• Public hearing(s).
• Council action.
• Fire District 1 on parallel track.
Councilmember Bernheim referred to the comment in the presentation that the transfer to Fire District 1
would provide attendant efficiencies and effectiveness and asked whether there would any attendant
inefficiencies or ineffectiveness as a result of the transfer. Chief Tomberg responded fire departments
could be too big although he did not feel 11 stations was too big. He commented there were economies of
scale and things Fire District 1 did today that would also apply to Edmonds. He felt after the transfer Fire
District 1 would be the right size for an urban county particularly with the growth occurring in Edmonds
and the unincorporated area.
Councilmember Bernheim referred to the presumption that financial costs would be lightened, pointing
out if the City was paying a fee based on a formula, there was the potential for it to ratchet out of control
and increase the City’s financial obligation for providing fire service, yet the City would have less
control. He asked if it was possible costs could escalate out of control. Chief Tomberg acknowledged
there was the potential for costs to get out of control in any governmental agency. He noted the contract
for service provided to the Council on April 13 contained a base fee; that fee was seven figures less than
the 2009 Fire Department program budget. He acknowledged costs did not go down; the best scenario
was to control the raise of the increase which could be done with efficiencies and economies of scale.
Councilmember Bernheim noted tonight’s presentation was heavy on the positive and wanted to ensure
the negatives were considered to avoid making a “pie in the sky” decision. He referred to the potential
decrease in fire insurance rates and asked if individual homeowners could expect to save $5 or $100.
Chief Tomberg replied closer to $5 than $100 but that was a great deal when the savings to all households
were combined. With regard to negatives, Chief Tomberg noted they would be considered when the draft
contract was forwarded to Mayor Haakenson and his negotiating team. He summarized regionalization
was the way to go and the City should consider regionalizing as many services as possible.
Councilmember Bernheim asked about unsuccessful consolidation efforts. Chief Tomberg answered
there had been more unsuccessful than successful consolidation efforts; he had been involved in one other
consolidation since 1999.
Councilmember Bernheim commented regionalization can result in a loss of control. Chief Tomberg
agreed that was possible, noting a good contract with adequate checks was key. He pointed out in many
King County cities, police services are provided via a contract with the King County Sheriff’s Office. He
summarized not every city can afford to be a full service city anymore.
Councilmember Bernheim referred to the list of additional services that would be provided by Fire
District 1 such as a safety officer, public education, first aid training, child safety, etc. and asked if the
citizens in Fire District 1 would lose some of those services if those services were provided to Edmonds.
Chief Tomberg answered the transfer of 54 employees would assist with the delivery of those services.
Councilmember Bernheim referred to the list of Edmonds Fire Department costs, asking whether they
were net of revenues. Chief Tomberg answered they were not. Councilmember Bernheim asked whether
Packet Page 13 of 930
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 7, 2009
Page 11
the revenue raised by the Fire Department was reflected in the presentation. Chief Tomberg answered
revenue was not included, noting the information provided to the Council on April 13 indicated there
would be a $1.4 million savings. Councilmember Bernheim recommended the presentation include the
revenues that would be lost if the City contracted with Fire District 1 for fire service. Chief Tomberg
recalled from the budget the Fire Department generated approximately $5.6 million.
Councilmember Bernheim asked when and how that information would be provided to the Council.
Chief Tomberg advised staff was meeting with Fire District 1 tomorrow and he anticipated another
meeting later this week with both labor groups and both fire administrations to complete the draft contract
before it was forwarded to Mayor Haakenson. Mayor Haakenson advised once he received the contract,
he and staff would review it and he was hopeful it could be presented to the Council within a month.
Councilmember Wambolt asked what methodology was used to determine the price when the City
purchased Fire Station 20. Chief Tomberg answered Fire District 1 hired a professional appraiser. He
advised in this process WCIA had an appraiser determine the replacement value. Those numbers will be
included in the draft contract provided to Mayor Haakenson.
Councilmember Wambolt referred to comments that it may not be a good time to sell fire stations due to
the depressed real estate market, noting there was not an open market for fire stations. He anticipated the
value would be determined via replacement cost versus market value. Chief Tomberg answered that was
Finance Director Kathleen Junglov’s determination as well and she supported the use of WCIA. Mayor
Haakenson advised the assessed value from the Snohomish County Assessor in 2010 for Station 20 is
$115,000 less than 2009; if the sale is not complete until 2010, the price will be at least $115,000 less.
Councilmember Wambolt referred to the list of other fire costs in 2009 and costs that were anticipated to
be ongoing. He recalled when contracting with Fire District 1 was originally considered, the estimated
saving to the General Fund was $1 million. He asked whether these ongoing costs would reduce the
estimated savings. Chief Tomberg answered the other fire costs were the portion of costs paid by fire; for
example, the total annual charge for SNOCOM was $819,661; of that fire paid $249,622, Public Works
pays 5%, the remainder is paid by law enforcement.
Councilmember Wambolt inquired about the comment that Fire District 1 would reduce Edmonds’ annual
payment based on serving Esperance and Woodway. Chief Tomberg advised the base fee quoted in the
documents provided to the Council on April 13 deducted the amount Fire District 1 would retain by not
contracting out Esperance and what they would gain from being a contract provider to Woodway.
Councilmember Peterson commented the additional services provided by Fire District 1 such as CPR
training, safety programs, senior citizen programs, etc. was a big positive in addition to the financial
aspects. He inquired about the cost for the Edmonds Fire Department to establish a similar CPR program.
Chief Tomberg answered it would require payment of overtime because a class could not be conducted
with on-duty staff. Fire District 1 had the resources to provide those services uninterrupted; Edmonds
Fire Department did not. Councilmember Peterson commented those were services that a city of
Edmonds’ size and character should offer.
Councilmember Peterson asked about the current automatic aid agreements. Chief Tomberg responded
they were written agreements but automatic aid was provided as resources were available versus
providing services throughout the district via 11-stations. He advised automatic aid agreements with
other fire agencies such as Lynnwood would continue. Fire District 1 personnel obtained the 32
signatures necessary on the automatic aid agreement.
Packet Page 14 of 930
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 7, 2009
Page 12
For Councilmember Peterson, Chief Tomberg agreed this was a step toward regionalization. He recalled
meetings held regarding the formation of a Regional Fire Authority were postponed due to annexation
issues in other areas. The intent was to combine resources for great efficiencies and greater effectiveness.
Council President Wilson commented he trusted Chief Tomberg and Fire District 1’s expertise. He
commented on the importance of comparing “apples to apples” such as the $1 million savings as well as
negatives from the Edmonds Fire Department and Fire District 1’s perspective. He referred to Chief
Tomberg’s comment that Edmonds did more with less than a lot of fire departments and that Edmonds
department raised more of its program budget than many other fire departments, asking whether the City
adequately funded fire service. Chief Tomberg answered not in his opinion.
Council President Wilson referred to the list of services Fire District 1 could provide and asked which
were “need to have” and which were “want to have.” Chief Tomberg commented most of the services on
that list should be provided by an urban fire department. He pointed out the importance of a training
facility. Council President Wilson asked why Edmonds did not take advantage of the capital investment
Fire District 1 and Shoreline have made in their training facilities. Chief Tomberg answered Edmonds
personnel did use those facilities periodically but it was when those agencies were not using the facilities.
Council President Wilson asked if Edmonds fire personnel were under trained due to the lack of a training
facility. Chief Tomberg answered training was critically important to the fire service and the best way to
provide training was to have a facility within or close to the community that personnel can access. If
Edmonds were partners in the Shoreline facility, greater access would be available. As part of Fire
District 1, half the stations train at one time while the other stations provide coverage.
Council President Wilson asked how much more money would be needed to adequately fund fire service
in Edmonds. Chief Tomberg answered he did not have the answer, but it would include building a fire
training facility and a Fire Department headquarters. He commented in the ten years since he has been
the Fire Chief, the budget has been flat lined and he did not anticipate that would change in the future. He
viewed the fire proposal, the levy and the Economic Development Commission as a three-legged stool to
increase City revenues. The City did not need to have its own fire department; it needed to ensure fire
and EMS services were available to its citizens and in his opinion the best way to provide those services
was via a regionalized service with Fire District 1.
Council President Wilson emphasized he was trying to figure out how to compare apples with apples. He
was a firm advocate of going to the public to ask if they wanted to spend more for certain services. If he
were able to determine how much would be required to adequately fund Fire Department operations as
well as funds for capital projects, he could compare that with the proposed contract and make an informed
decision.
Chief Tomberg recalled capital projects were one of the first causalities of the Citizen Levy Review
Committee. Council President Wilson commented the intent of the levy this November was not to solve
everything; with the passage of initiatives limiting property taxes increases to 1%, cities must go to the
voters more often. Regardless of whether the levy passed this November, he assumed the Council would
go to the public for another levy in the next few years. He summarized although a bond for capital
projects was not placed on the ballot this November, that did not mean it would never happen. Chief
Tomberg offered to provide the cost of acquiring the land next to Station 16 and to construct a training
facility and Fire Department administration headquarters as well as the cost to hire staff to provide the
additional services Fire District 1 can provide. Council President Wilson recalled in a recent report the
primary strategy to decrease response time was to reallocate stations and asked Chief Tomberg to
estimate the cost of reallocating stations. Chief Tomberg anticipated the costs would be monstrous.
Packet Page 15 of 930
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 7, 2009
Page 13
Councilmember Plunkett referred to the list of other successful combinations and asked whether Edmonds
could afford to do its own SNOCOM. Chief Tomberg answered it would be cost prohibitive.
Councilmember Plunkett asked if the Council had complete local control over SNOCOM. Chief
Tomberg replied Edmonds had two votes on the SNOCOM Board. Councilmember Plunkett asked if
Chief Tomberg considered SNOCOM a successful regional effort. Chief Tomberg answered it was
extremely successful.
Councilmember Plunkett asked about the success of the 800 MHz radio. Chief Tomberg answered it
worked very well and was one of the best 800 MHz systems in the state. Councilmember Plunkett asked
whether Edmonds could afford to do its own system. Chief Tomberg answered no. Councilmember
Plunkett pointed out the Council did not have full control of the 800 MHz. Chief Tomberg advised the
City had one vote on the Board.
Councilmember Plunkett commented the City had representatives on the other boards listed under other
successful combinations and asked whether those organizations served the City well. Chief Tomberg
answered yes; for example the E-911 Committee administers a $9.2 million budget in 2010.
Councilmember Plunkett referred to the statement in Chief Tomberg’s presentation that the City would
retain membership and financial responsibility for ESCA, SNOCOM and SERS. The draft contract states
the District shall represent the City on intergovernmental boards. Chief Tomberg answered it should state
that the City retains membership and financial responsibility, however, there may be committees on
which technical expertise is important and Fire District 1 personnel should represent the City.
Councilmember Plunkett asked why the contract proposed a 4-year lease-purchase rather than a lump sum
purchase. Chief Tomberg answered it was more practical and was subject to negotiation.
Councilmember Plunkett asked about the information provided regarding Edmonds Fire Department
operating costs, overhead costs and other fire costs. Chief Tomberg answered it was an attempt to
illustrate the cost to operate the Fire Department for one year. Councilmember Plunkett suggested the
information be provided in a format that illustrated savings via contracting with Fire District 1. He asked
about other fire costs that could be eliminated such as fire station debt service, apparatus replacement and
pension transfer. Chief Tomberg answered for example when the fire stations were sold, the Council
could pay us those funds to pay off the debt service if they chose.
Councilmember Plunkett asked Chief Tomberg to explain how the overhead costs ($401,040) were
calculated. Chief Tomberg answered the numbers reflect the Fire Department’s 20% utilization of the
City’s employees. He explained without the Fire Department, some of the overhead costs could be
reallocated; for example with 54 fewer employees, there was less payroll to calculate and that employee’s
time could be reallocated.
For Councilmember Orvis, Chief Tomberg explained Fire District 1 did not have a Fire Marshal because
those services were provided by the Snohomish County Fire Marshal. Councilmember Orvis asked how
inspections would be conducted. Chief Tomberg answered nothing would change, the engine company
fire inspection program would continue.
Mayor Haakenson anticipated staff and he would return to the Council within the next month with another
update.
Councilmember Wambolt referred to the anticipated $1 million savings to the General Fund, pointing out
comparing the Edmonds Fire Department to Fire District 1 was comparing apples to oranges because Fire
Packet Page 16 of 930
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 7, 2009
Page 14
District 1 could provide more services. If Edmonds was providing those services, the savings would be
considerably more than $1 million.
7. MAYOR'S COMMENTS
Mayor Haakenson referred to Mr. Hertrich’s comments regarding the outdoor dining at Daffney’s next to
the theater, explaining after the street use permit was issued to construct the temporary structure, staff had
concerns with what was allowed by the Code. He assured the temporary structure was legal and in
accordance with what is allowed by the Code and was 44 inches from the curb to the bump-out. Staff
plans to make a report to the Council in a few weeks regarding how other cities address outdoor dining,
the Washington State Liquor Control Board’s requirements for outside liquor sales, etc. He advised
Daffney’s permit was for one year and would expire this winter. No other street use permits for outdoor
dining were being issued while staff reviews the Code.
8. COUNCIL COMMENTS
Council President Wilson read the resolution the Council approved as Consent Agenda Item G:
A RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF THE CREATION OF A HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION
IN SNOHOMISH COUNTY
Whereas, the reduction of hate and bias crime saves community and personal revenue by
reducing property loss from vandalism, litigation and court costs and reduction in use of emergency
services such as police and medical professionals; and
Whereas, a Snohomish County Human Rights Commission will provide for more local control
over content of the law and will be better able to respond to emerging trends in the community; and
Whereas, with local enforcement capability a Snohomish County Human Rights Commission will
have the inherent credibility to perform outreach education and dispute resolution functions necessary to
provide a more effective program; and
Whereas, a local Snohomish County Human Rights Commission can provide resources spent to
assist with local needs that are not prioritized at the state level in competition with the needs and issues of
the entire state; and
Whereas, the local community can better identify local resources that may be missed or not
utilized by the state to address local concerns and issues; and
Whereas, after one year of work, the Snohomish County Council is ready to pass an ordinance
creating a Human Rights Commission,
Now therefore be it resolved that the Edmonds City Council supports the creation of a Snohomish
County Human Rights Commission and endorses adoption, by the Snohomish County Council, of the
Ordinance to create a Snohomish County Human Rights Commission.
Council President Wilson explained the July 21 agenda will include a resolution to approve the levy for
the November ballot and the July 28 consent agenda will include an ordinance to send to Snohomish
County to place the levy on the November ballot. He advised he would be absent from the July 28
meeting due to work related travel.
Councilmember Peterson commended the Council for approving the resolution supporting the creation of
a Snohomish County Human Rights Commission. He thanked the Greater Edmonds Chamber of
Commerce for the 4th of July Children’s Parade, noting there were over 2,000 participants in the
Children’s Parade. He extended his thanks to the Chamber staff and countless volunteers for their efforts
on the main parade and fireworks, providing an Edmonds-kind of 4th of July.
Packet Page 17 of 930
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 7, 2009
Page 15
Councilmember Wambolt suggested if the initiative proposed by Tim Eyman to limit the revenue cities
collect to the rate of inflation plus growth in population passed, it may negate the City’s levy. Council
President Wilson responded the initiative accepts voter-approved levies and if it did not, the State
Constitution allows citizens within a jurisdiction to tax themselves. Councilmember Wambolt
commented the wording of the initiative required a vote in a subsequent election.
Councilmember Wambolt recalled two weeks ago a citizen mentioned the possibility of the Edmonds
Post Office closing. Mayor Haakenson answered there was a consolidation effort occurring in the postal
service and consideration was being given to retaining the Perrinville station and closing the Edmonds
station next year. The postal service is looking for ways to economize and the Perrinville station was
much newer and in better condition. Councilmember Wambolt suggested the Council discuss whether an
effort should be made to convince the postal service to keep the Edmonds Post Office open.
With regard to the outdoor dining area near the theater, Councilmember Bernheim expressed his support
for outdoor dining, viewing it as an untapped potential revenue source. He noted in other countries streets
are closed to allow outdoor dining in summer months. He suggested holding a street dining festival in
Edmonds. He was supportive of Daffney’s outdoor dining area as long as it did not violate the Code
which allows only temporary structures; however, the railings appear to be bolted into the sidewalk.
Councilmember Bernheim suggested in an effort to promote outdoor dining, the City replace at least one
parking space each year with a pedestrian sidewalk area. For example, in front of Daffney’s, one parking
space could be converted into a mini esplanade. He suggested 3-4 parking spaces in front of the property
the City purchased at Old Mill Town be converted into a pedestrian area.
Councilmember Plunkett commented the Council supported outdoor dining. He pointed out the
downtown sidewalks were widened 20-25 years ago and bump-outs constructed to create outdoor dining
spaces.
Councilmember Plunkett thanked the Chamber of Commerce for their efforts on the 4th of July parade and
fireworks, noting they incurred approximately $15,000 in debt to provide the 4th of July festivities this
year.
9. ADJOURN
With no further business, the Council meeting was adjourned at 9:06 p.m.
Packet Page 18 of 930
AM-2404 2.C.
Approval of Claim Checks and Direct Deposits and Checks
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:07/21/2009
Submitted By:Debbie Karber, Administrative Services
Submitted For:Kathleen Junglov Time:Consent
Department:Administrative Services Type:Action
Review Committee:
Committee Action:Approved for Consent Agenda
Information
Subject Title
Approval of claim checks #112735 through #112922 dated July 9, 2009 for $322,062.87, and
claim checks #112923 through #113065 dated July 16, 2009 for $522,011.21. Approval of payroll
direct deposit and checks #48312 through #48378 for the pay period July 1 through July 15, 2009
for $866,528.52.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Approval of claim checks and payroll direct deposits and checks.
Previous Council Action
N/A
Narrative
In accordance with the State statutes, City payments must be approved by the City Council.
Ordinance #2896 delegates this approval to the Council President who reviews and recommends
either approval or non-approval of expenditures.
Fiscal Impact
Fiscal Year:2009
Revenue:
Expenditure:$1,710,602.60
Fiscal Impact:
Claims: $844,074.08
Payroll: $866,528.52
Attachments
Link: Claim cks 7-9-09
Link: Claim cks 7-16-09
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 Admin Services Kathleen Junglov 07/16/2009 01:23 PM APRV
2 City Clerk Sandy Chase 07/16/2009 01:26 PM APRV
Packet Page 19 of 930
3 Mayor Gary Haakenson 07/16/2009 02:28 PM APRV
4 Final Approval Sandy Chase 07/16/2009 02:32 PM APRV
Form Started By: Debbie
Karber
Started On: 07/16/2009 01:03
PM
Final Approval Date: 07/16/2009
Packet Page 20 of 930
07/09/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
1
1:03:45PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112735 7/9/2009 072627 911 ETC INC 166461 Crisis Connect Monthly Maintenance 200
Crisis Connect Monthly Maintenance 200310-00118
001.000.310.518.880.480.00 100.00
REDCONNECT ONE-TIME FEE166630
2nd half of RedConnect Fee310-00118
001.000.310.518.880.420.00 287.50
Total :387.50
112736 7/9/2009 069798 A.M. LEONARD INC CI0980541 ORDER# SO09044884
BAMBOO STAKES
001.000.640.576.810.310.00 53.99
Total :53.99
112737 7/9/2009 065052 AARD PEST CONTROL 269487 MEADOWDALE RODENT CONTROL
MEADOWDALE CLUBHOUSE RODENT CONTROL
001.000.640.576.800.480.00 82.12
RODENT CONTROL269523
CITY WIDE RODENT CONTROL
001.000.640.576.800.480.00 93.08
Total :175.20
112738 7/9/2009 065052 AARD PEST CONTROL 269641 1-13992
PEST CONTROL
411.000.656.538.800.410.23 63.25
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.410.23 6.01
Total :69.26
112739 7/9/2009 061029 ABSOLUTE GRAPHIX 709429 DAYCAMP STAFF SHIRTS
STAFF & JC SHIRTS
001.000.640.575.530.310.00 1,937.82
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.575.530.310.00 184.89
1Page:
Packet Page 21 of 930
07/09/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
2
1:03:45PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112739 7/9/2009 (Continued)061029 ABSOLUTE GRAPHIX
BASKETBALL T-SHIRTS709432
BASKETBALL SHIRTS
001.000.640.575.520.310.00 88.40
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.575.520.310.00 8.40
Total :2,219.51
112740 7/9/2009 071234 ACUREN INSPECTION INC 0000255419 24-0155019
INCINERATOR SERVICE
411.000.656.538.800.410.21 1,359.30
Total :1,359.30
112741 7/9/2009 072810 ADAMS, DEBORAH J ADAMS0708 TRIP REFUND
STUDENT TRIP REFUND
623.200.000.367.200.000.00 1,350.00
Total :1,350.00
112742 7/9/2009 071177 ADVANTAGE BUILDING SERVICES 09-302 JANITORIAL
JANITORIAL
411.000.656.538.800.410.23 334.00
FLOORING MAINTENANCE09-303
FLOORING MAINTENANCE
411.000.656.538.800.410.23 273.33
Total :607.33
112743 7/9/2009 065568 ALLWATER INC 070209059 COEWASTE
DRINKING WATER
411.000.656.538.800.310.11 21.85
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.11 0.67
Total :22.52
112744 7/9/2009 069667 AMERICAN MARKETING 9933 BRONZE PLAQUE
2Page:
Packet Page 22 of 930
07/09/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
3
1:03:45PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112744 7/9/2009 (Continued)069667 AMERICAN MARKETING
CAST BRONZE PLAQUE FOR PARK IN SOUTH
127.000.640.575.500.310.00 124.00
Freight
127.000.640.575.500.310.00 5.00
9.5% Sales Tax
127.000.640.575.500.310.00 12.26
Total :141.26
112745 7/9/2009 001375 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION 161846-090503 Jen Machuga membership (category E)~
Jen Machuga membership (category E)~
001.000.620.558.600.490.00 255.00
Kernen Lien Membership(Category F)180853-090503
Kernen Lien Membership(Category F)
001.000.620.558.600.490.00 280.00
Total :535.00
112746 7/9/2009 069829 AMIDO, BENJAMIM AMIDO10903 UKULELE CLASSES
UKULELE CLASS #10903
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 262.50
Total :262.50
112747 7/9/2009 065378 APPLIED INDUSTRIAL TECH 40348398 Unit 91 - Normal Duty Flange Unit (2)
Unit 91 - Normal Duty Flange Unit (2)
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 176.32
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 16.75
Total :193.07
112748 7/9/2009 001634 AQUA QUIP 427496-1 50609
CHLORINE TABS
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 319.97
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 30.40
Total :350.37
112749 7/9/2009 069751 ARAMARK 655-4362824 UNIFORM SERVICES
3Page:
Packet Page 23 of 930
07/09/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
4
1:03:45PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112749 7/9/2009 (Continued)069751 ARAMARK
PARK MAINTENANCE UNIFORM SERVICES
001.000.640.576.800.240.00 34.04
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.240.00 3.23
Total :37.27
112750 7/9/2009 069751 ARAMARK 655-4338176 21580001
UNIFORM SERVICES
411.000.656.538.800.240.00 92.51
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.240.00 8.79
21580001655-4350484
UNIFORM SERVICES
411.000.656.538.800.240.00 92.71
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.240.00 8.81
Total :202.82
112751 7/9/2009 069751 ARAMARK 655-4355037 PW Mats
4Page:
Packet Page 24 of 930
07/09/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
5
1:03:45PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112751 7/9/2009 (Continued)069751 ARAMARK
PW Mats
001.000.650.519.910.410.00 1.75
PW Mats
111.000.653.542.900.410.00 6.65
PW Mats
411.000.652.542.900.410.00 6.65
PW Mats
411.000.654.534.800.410.00 6.65
PW Mats
411.000.655.535.800.410.00 6.65
PW Mats
511.000.657.548.680.410.00 6.65
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.650.519.910.410.00 0.17
9.5% Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.900.410.00 0.63
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.652.542.900.410.00 0.63
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.410.00 0.63
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.410.00 0.63
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.410.00 0.64
Street/Storm uniform svc655-4355038
Street/Storm uniform svc
111.000.653.542.900.240.00 3.51
Street/Storm uniform svc
411.000.652.542.900.240.00 3.51
9.5% Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.900.240.00 0.34
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.652.542.900.240.00 0.33
5Page:
Packet Page 25 of 930
07/09/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
6
1:03:45PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112751 7/9/2009 (Continued)069751 ARAMARK
Fleet Uniform Svc655-4355039
Fleet Uniform Svc
511.000.657.548.680.240.00 15.00
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.240.00 1.43
Fac Maint Uniform Svc655-4362825
Fac Maint Uniform Svc
001.000.651.519.920.240.00 40.44
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.240.00 3.84
6Page:
Packet Page 26 of 930
07/09/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7
1:03:45PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112751 7/9/2009 (Continued)069751 ARAMARK
PW Mats655-4367400
PW Mats
001.000.650.519.910.410.00 1.75
PW Mats
111.000.653.542.900.410.00 6.65
PW Mats
411.000.652.542.900.410.00 6.65
PW Mats
411.000.654.534.800.410.00 6.65
PW Mats
411.000.655.535.800.410.00 6.65
PW Mats
511.000.657.548.680.410.00 6.65
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.650.519.910.410.00 0.17
9.5% Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.900.410.00 0.63
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.652.542.900.410.00 0.63
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.410.00 0.63
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.410.00 0.63
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.410.00 0.64
Street/Storm Uniform Svc655-4367401
9.5% Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.900.240.00 0.34
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.652.542.900.240.00 0.33
Street/Storm Uniform Svc
111.000.653.542.900.240.00 3.51
Street/Storm Uniform Svc
411.000.652.542.900.240.00 3.51
7Page:
Packet Page 27 of 930
07/09/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
8
1:03:45PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112751 7/9/2009 (Continued)069751 ARAMARK
Fleet Uniform svc655-4367402
Fleet Uniform svc
511.000.657.548.680.240.00 15.00
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.240.00 1.43
Total :169.18
112752 7/9/2009 071124 ASSOCIATED PETROLEUM 590807 75179
DIESEL FUEL
411.000.656.538.800.320.00 1,664.40
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.320.00 158.12
75179591216
DIESEL FUEL
411.000.656.538.800.320.00 298.71
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.320.00 28.38
Total :2,149.61
112753 7/9/2009 064343 AT&T 425-776-5316 PARKS FAX MODEM
PARKS FAX MODEM
001.000.640.576.800.420.00 40.90
Total :40.90
112754 7/9/2009 064343 AT&T 425-771-0152 STATION #16 FAX
STATION #16 FAX
001.000.510.522.200.420.00 39.20
Total :39.20
112755 7/9/2009 070305 AUTOMATIC FUNDS TRANSFER 50925 OUT SOURCING OF UTILITY BILLS
8Page:
Packet Page 28 of 930
07/09/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
9
1:03:45PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112755 7/9/2009 (Continued)070305 AUTOMATIC FUNDS TRANSFER
UB Outsourcing area #100 Printing
411.000.652.542.900.490.00 91.18
UB Outsourcing area #100 Printing
411.000.654.534.800.490.00 91.18
UB Outsourcing area #100 Printing
411.000.655.535.800.490.00 91.45
UB Outsourcing area #100 Postage
411.000.654.534.800.420.00 293.22
UB Outsourcing area #100 Postage
411.000.655.535.800.420.00 293.22
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.652.542.900.490.00 8.66
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.490.00 8.66
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.490.00 8.69
OUT SOURCING OF UTILITY BILLS50965
UB Outsourcing area #400 Printing
411.000.652.542.900.490.00 124.01
UB Outsourcing area #400 Printing
411.000.654.534.800.490.00 124.01
UB Outsourcing area #400 Printing
411.000.655.535.800.490.00 124.39
UB Outsourcing area #400 Postage
411.000.654.534.800.420.00 399.46
UB Outsourcing area #400 Postage
411.000.655.535.800.420.00 399.45
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.652.542.900.490.00 11.78
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.490.00 11.78
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.490.00 11.82
9Page:
Packet Page 29 of 930
07/09/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
10
1:03:45PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112755 7/9/2009 (Continued)070305 AUTOMATIC FUNDS TRANSFER
OUT SOURCING OF UTILITY BILLS51017
UB Outsourcing area #200 Printing
411.000.652.542.900.490.00 90.23
UB Outsourcing area #200 Printing
411.000.654.534.800.490.00 90.23
UB Outsourcing area #200 Printing
411.000.655.535.800.490.00 90.51
UB Outsourcing area #200 Postage
411.000.654.534.800.420.00 290.09
UB Outsourcing area #200 Postage
411.000.655.535.800.420.00 290.09
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.652.542.900.490.00 8.57
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.490.00 8.57
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.490.00 8.60
OUT SOURCING OF UTILITY BILLS51070
UB Outsourcing area #700 Printing
411.000.652.542.900.490.00 23.10
UB Outsourcing area #700 Printing
411.000.654.534.800.490.00 23.10
UB Outsourcing area #700 Printing
411.000.655.535.800.490.00 23.16
UB Outsourcing area #700 Postage
411.000.654.534.800.420.00 96.58
UB Outsourcing area #700 Postage
411.000.655.535.800.420.00 96.58
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.652.542.900.490.00 2.20
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.490.00 2.20
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.490.00 2.19
10Page:
Packet Page 30 of 930
07/09/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
11
1:03:45PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :3,238.961127557/9/2009 070305 070305 AUTOMATIC FUNDS TRANSFER
112756 7/9/2009 069076 BACKGROUND INVESTIGATIONS INC COE0609 Background check services
Background check services
001.000.220.516.100.410.00 715.00
Total :715.00
112757 7/9/2009 070992 BANC OF AMERICA LEASING 011041925 Canon 5870 copier lease (8/1 - 8/31/09)
Canon 5870 copier lease (8/1 - 8/31/09)
001.000.610.519.700.480.00 101.35
Canon 5870 copier lease (8/1 - 8/31/09)
001.000.220.516.100.450.00 101.32
Canon 5870 copier lease (8/1 - 8/31/09)
001.000.210.513.100.450.00 101.33
Supply charge
001.000.610.519.700.480.00 25.01
Supply charge
001.000.220.516.100.450.00 25.00
Supply charge
001.000.210.513.100.450.00 24.99
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.610.519.700.480.00 12.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.220.516.100.450.00 12.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.210.513.100.450.00 12.00
Total :415.00
112758 7/9/2009 072319 BEACH CAMP LLC BEACHCAMP10875 WATER SPORTS BEACH CAMP
WATER SPORTS BEACH CAMP~
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 600.00
Total :600.00
112759 7/9/2009 072811 BELL, LORI BELL0708 TRIP REFUND
STUDENT TRIP REFUND
623.200.000.367.200.000.00 1,350.00
11Page:
Packet Page 31 of 930
07/09/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
12
1:03:45PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :1,350.001127597/9/2009 072811 072811 BELL, LORI
112760 7/9/2009 072812 BENNETT, MITZI BENNETT0708 TRIP REFUND
REFUND FOR STUDENT TRIP
623.200.000.367.200.000.00 1,350.00
Total :1,350.00
112761 7/9/2009 002258 BENS EVER READY 1087 INV#1087 EDMONDS PD
YEARLY SERVICE, FIRE EXTING.
001.000.410.521.220.480.00 96.00
REPLACE HYDRO IN 3 FIRE EXTING.
001.000.410.521.220.480.00 105.00
2 FIRE EX. NEEDED GYRO BREAKDWN
001.000.410.521.220.480.00 20.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.220.480.00 21.00
Total :242.00
112762 7/9/2009 069226 BHC CONSULTANTS LLC 0002564 E8GB.Services thru 06/19/09
E8GB.Services thru 06/19/09
412.300.630.594.320.410.00 9,215.89
Total :9,215.89
112763 7/9/2009 071633 BLACK ROCK CABLE INC 12821 Jul-09 Fiber Lease - 7100 210th St SW
Jul-09 Fiber Lease - 7100 210th St SW
001.000.310.518.870.450.00 470.00
Jul-09 Franchise fee on Fiber Lease
001.000.310.518.870.450.00 23.50
Total :493.50
112764 7/9/2009 002500 BLUMENTHAL UNIFORM CO INC 750082 INV#750082 EDMONDS PD - BARKER
DUTY BELT BUCKLE, BRASS
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 9.50
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 0.90
12Page:
Packet Page 32 of 930
07/09/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
13
1:03:45PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112764 7/9/2009 (Continued)002500 BLUMENTHAL UNIFORM CO INC
INV#752695 - EDMONDS PD - TRAFFIC752695
PICKET TRAFFIC TEMPLATES
001.000.410.521.710.310.00 12.26
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.710.310.00 1.16
INV#753032 - EDMONDS PD - SWAT753032
SWAT EMBLEMS
001.000.410.521.230.490.00 40.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.230.490.00 3.80
Total :67.62
112765 7/9/2009 072813 BOONE, CAROLYN D BOONE0708 TRIP REFUND
REFUND FOR STUDENT TRIP
623.200.000.367.200.000.00 1,350.00
Total :1,350.00
112766 7/9/2009 072814 BUCHHEIT-EKDAHL, LISA L BUCHHEIT-EKDAHL0708 TRIP REFUND
REFUND FOR STUDENT TRIP
623.200.000.367.200.000.00 1,350.00
Total :1,350.00
112767 7/9/2009 071766 CAMPBELL, CONNIE CAMPBELL10864 BOWMAN BAY KAYAK TOUR
BOWMAN BAY KAYAKING #10864
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 248.40
Total :248.40
112768 7/9/2009 072075 CAMPBELL, RICHARD 2009-7-2 ALS PROF SERVICES
June med prgm dir
001.000.510.526.100.410.00 1,725.00
Total :1,725.00
112769 7/9/2009 072815 CANNON, NICOLA CANNON0708 TRIP REFUND
REFUND FOR STUDENT TRIP
623.200.000.367.200.000.00 1,350.00
13Page:
Packet Page 33 of 930
07/09/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
14
1:03:45PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :1,350.001127697/9/2009 072815 072815 CANNON, NICOLA
112770 7/9/2009 072816 CARROLL, DONNA CARROLL0708 TRIP REFUND
REFUND FOR STUDENT TRIP
623.200.000.367.200.000.00 1,000.00
Total :1,000.00
112771 7/9/2009 003330 CASCADE TROPHY 29803 2009 service awards
2009 service awards
001.000.220.516.100.490.00 894.50
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.220.516.100.490.00 84.98
Total :979.48
112772 7/9/2009 003330 CASCADE TROPHY 29816 VOLUNTEERS SUPPLIES
Waterball plaques
001.000.510.522.410.310.00 66.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.410.310.00 6.27
Total :72.27
112773 7/9/2009 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY LY 145501 2954000
GRINDING WHEEL
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 51.80
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 4.92
2954000LY 145538
WELDING HELMET
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 299.00
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 28.41
2954000LY145657
WELDING GLOVES/FITTINGS
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 99.82
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 9.48
14Page:
Packet Page 34 of 930
07/09/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
15
1:03:45PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112773 7/9/2009 (Continued)003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY
2954000RN06091051
CYLINDER RENTAL
411.000.656.538.800.450.21 33.20
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.450.21 3.15
Total :529.78
112774 7/9/2009 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY LY145617 ALS SUPPLIES
medical oxygen
001.000.510.526.100.310.00 22.98
Freight
001.000.510.526.100.310.00 17.50
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.510.526.100.310.00 3.84
ALS SUPPLIESLY145618
medical oxygen
001.000.510.526.100.310.00 79.21
Freight
001.000.510.526.100.310.00 17.50
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.510.526.100.310.00 9.18
ALS SUPPLIESLY145619
medical oxygen
001.000.510.526.100.310.00 45.96
Freight
001.000.510.526.100.310.00 17.50
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.510.526.100.310.00 6.03
ALS RENTALRN06091049
cylinder rental
001.000.510.526.100.450.00 33.20
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.510.526.100.450.00 3.15
Total :256.05
15Page:
Packet Page 35 of 930
07/09/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
16
1:03:45PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112775 7/9/2009 063615 CH MURPHY | CLARK-ULLMAN INC 0906027C 130750
INCINERATOR REPAIR
411.000.656.538.800.480.21 20,524.95
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.480.21 726.00
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.480.21 2,018.84
Total :23,269.79
112776 7/9/2009 064690 CHAMPION BOLT & SUPPLY INC 505097 EDM00001
NITRILE GLOVES
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 1,183.50
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 108.88
Total :1,292.38
112777 7/9/2009 003710 CHEVRON AND TEXACO BUSINESS 19331246 INV#19331246 ACCT#7898305185 EDMONDS PD
FUEL FOR NARCS VEHICLE
104.000.410.521.210.320.00 152.01
Total :152.01
112778 7/9/2009 066382 CINTAS CORPORATION 460455094 UNIFORMS
Stn. 17 - ALS
001.000.510.526.100.240.00 127.57
Stn. 17 - OPS
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 127.58
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.510.526.100.240.00 12.12
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 12.12
OPS UNIFORMS460455113
Stn. 20
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 126.65
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 12.03
16Page:
Packet Page 36 of 930
07/09/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
17
1:03:45PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112778 7/9/2009 (Continued)066382 CINTAS CORPORATION
OPS UNIFORMS460458072
Stn. 16
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 120.71
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 11.47
UNIFORMS460458073
Volunteers
001.000.510.522.410.240.00 21.16
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.410.240.00 2.01
UNIFORMS460459951
Stn 17 - OPS
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 127.58
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.510.526.100.240.00 12.12
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 12.12
Stn 17 - ALS
001.000.510.526.100.240.00 127.57
OPS UNIFORMS460459971
Stn 20
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 136.85
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 13.00
OPS UNIFORMS460462913
Stn. 16
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 120.71
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 11.47
UNIFORMS460462914
Volunteers
001.000.510.522.410.240.00 21.16
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.410.240.00 2.01
17Page:
Packet Page 37 of 930
07/09/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
18
1:03:45PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112778 7/9/2009 (Continued)066382 CINTAS CORPORATION
UNIFORMS460464748
Stn 17 - ALS
001.000.510.526.100.240.00 127.57
Stn 17 - OPS
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 127.58
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.510.526.100.240.00 12.12
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 12.12
Total :1,437.40
112779 7/9/2009 069457 CITY OF EDMONDS E6DA.ROW Permit E6DA.Right of Way Permit for 76th/75th
E6DA.Right of Way Permit for 76th/75th
125.000.640.594.750.650.00 260.00
E9FB.Right of Way Permit for TalbotE9FB.ROW Permit
E9FB.Right of Way Permit for Talbot
412.200.630.594.320.410.00 260.00
Total :520.00
112780 7/9/2009 019215 CITY OF LYNNWOOD 07/02/2009 INV 07/02/2009 - EDMONDS PD
N95 MASKS
001.000.410.521.220.310.00 436.00
ADMINISTRATIVE FEE 4%
001.000.410.521.220.310.00 17.44
Total :453.44
112781 7/9/2009 019215 CITY OF LYNNWOOD 7123 MONTHLY MAINT/OPERATIONS SEWER COSTS
MONTHLY MAINT/OPERATIONS SEWER COSTS
411.000.655.535.800.470.00 13,800.83
Total :13,800.83
112782 7/9/2009 004095 COASTWIDE LABS W2078811 CLEANING SUPPLIES
18Page:
Packet Page 38 of 930
07/09/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
19
1:03:45PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112782 7/9/2009 (Continued)004095 COASTWIDE LABS
BREAK UP CLEANER, GENTLE BLUE SOAP
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 347.76
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 33.04
Total :380.80
112783 7/9/2009 070323 COMCAST 0721433/0709 BUNDLES SERVICES FOR CEMETERY
BUNDLED SERVICES
130.000.640.536.200.420.00 113.12
Total :113.12
112784 7/9/2009 069482 COMPRESSORS NORTHWEST 68084 Unit 476 - Supplies
Unit 476 - Supplies
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 9.49
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 0.90
Total :10.39
112785 7/9/2009 068815 CORRECT EQUIPMENT 21159 MECHANICAL SEAL/CUTTER WHEEL/GASKET
MECHANICAL SEAL/CUTTER WHEEL/GASKET
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 331.98
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 5.20
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 30.01
Total :367.19
112786 7/9/2009 069848 CRAM, KATHERINE CRAM11295 IRISH DANCE CLASSES
19Page:
Packet Page 39 of 930
07/09/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
20
1:03:45PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112786 7/9/2009 (Continued)069848 CRAM, KATHERINE
IRISH DANCE FOR KIDS~
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 117.60
IRISH DANCE 13+ #11292
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 157.50
IRISH DANCE 13+ #11293
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 126.00
IRISH DANCE FOR KIDS #11294
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 58.80
Total :459.90
112787 7/9/2009 046150 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY 65069 RENEW PW ELEVATOR PERMIT FOR 05
Renewal PW Elevator Op Permit thru 3/06
001.000.651.519.920.490.00 100.00
Total :100.00
112788 7/9/2009 068591 DOUBLEDAY, MICHAEL 62009 STATE LOBBYIST FOR JUNE 2009
State lobbyist chgs for June 2009
001.000.610.519.700.410.00 2,391.25
Total :2,391.25
112789 7/9/2009 066404 DTC COMMUNICATIONS INC 60678 INV#60678 EDMONDS POLICE DEPT.
P25 MICRO TX/RECORDER
104.000.410.521.210.350.00 2,750.00
Freight
104.000.410.521.210.350.00 12.18
Total :2,762.18
112790 7/9/2009 070244 DUANE HARTMAN & ASSOCIATES INC 09-1569.1 Olympic View Drive Tree Survey
Olympic View Drive Tree Survey
111.000.653.542.310.410.00 1,468.35
Total :1,468.35
112791 7/9/2009 007253 DUNN LUMBER 02341785 FAC - Hardboard
20Page:
Packet Page 40 of 930
07/09/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
21
1:03:45PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112791 7/9/2009 (Continued)007253 DUNN LUMBER
FAC - Hardboard
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 36.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 3.42
Total :39.42
112792 7/9/2009 007675 EDMONDS AUTO PARTS 10591 SUPPLIES
V-BELT
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 9.95
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 0.95
Total :10.90
112793 7/9/2009 069523 EDMONDS P&R YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP CERNA0708 YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP
FOR CERNA: INCORRECT AMOUNT FOR
122.000.640.574.100.490.00 38.00
Total :38.00
112794 7/9/2009 062190 EDMONDS POLICE DEPT Petty Cash Det7-1-09 PETTY CASH DETECTIVES BUY FUND 7-1-09
PIZZA - HOMICIDE SCENE 09-1539
001.000.410.521.210.310.00 20.00
WATER - HOMICIDE SCENE 09-1539
001.000.410.521.210.310.00 3.99
Total :23.99
112795 7/9/2009 008688 EDMONDS VETERINARY HOSPITAL 175876 INV#175876 - CLIENT #308/EDMONDS PD
21Page:
Packet Page 41 of 930
07/09/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
22
1:03:45PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112795 7/9/2009 (Continued)008688 EDMONDS VETERINARY HOSPITAL
EXAM,VACCINE/K9 ROCKY
001.000.410.521.260.410.00 89.15
SOFT CHEWS #240 CHEWS
001.000.410.521.260.310.00 87.00
FRONTLINE/ DOG
001.000.410.521.260.310.00 93.00
INTERCEPTOR #12 WHITE
001.000.410.521.260.310.00 91.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.260.310.00 25.76
Total :385.91
112796 7/9/2009 069878 EDMONDS-WESTGATE VET HOSPITAL 127782 INV#127782 CLIENT #5118 - EDMONDS AC
SPAY DOG - IMPOUND #7810
001.000.410.521.700.490.01 108.00
SPAY DOG - IMPOUND#7775
001.000.410.521.700.490.01 108.00
Total :216.00
112797 7/9/2009 008812 ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINES 046147 ADMIN MAINT
copier maint
001.000.510.522.100.480.00 50.26
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.100.480.00 4.77
Total :55.03
112798 7/9/2009 070033 EVERGREEN PRINT SOLUTIONS 34274 ALS PROF SERVICES
MIR printing
001.000.510.526.100.410.00 974.90
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.510.526.100.410.00 92.62
Total :1,067.52
112799 7/9/2009 009895 FELDMAN, JAMES A 063009 PUBLIC DEFENDER FEE
22Page:
Packet Page 42 of 930
07/09/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
23
1:03:45PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112799 7/9/2009 (Continued)009895 FELDMAN, JAMES A
PUBLIC DEFENDER FEE
001.000.390.512.520.410.00 11,530.00
Total :11,530.00
112800 7/9/2009 009815 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC 1507608 17983
BACK FLOW PREVENTER
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 502.76
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 47.76
Total :550.52
112801 7/9/2009 070855 FLEX PLAN SERVICES INC 140082 Section 125 Plan fees - June 2009
Section 125 Plan fees - June 2009
001.000.220.516.100.410.00 50.00
Section 132 Plan fees - June 2009
001.000.220.516.100.410.00 30.00
Total :80.00
112802 7/9/2009 072817 FRANKLIN, BEVERLY FRANKLIN0708 TRIP REFUND
REFUND FOR STUDENT TRIP
623.200.000.367.200.000.00 1,350.00
Total :1,350.00
112803 7/9/2009 072818 GADDY, GWENNA GADDY0708 TRIP REFUND
REFUND FOR STUDENT TRIP
623.200.000.367.200.000.00 1,350.00
Total :1,350.00
112804 7/9/2009 012198 GFOA 0037713S GAAFR Subscription 8/1/09-7/31/10
GAAFR Subscription 8/1/09-7/31/10
001.000.310.514.230.490.00 50.00
Total :50.00
112805 7/9/2009 068617 GLEISNER, BARBARA GLEISNER11078 QIGONG CLASSES
23Page:
Packet Page 43 of 930
07/09/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
24
1:03:45PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112805 7/9/2009 (Continued)068617 GLEISNER, BARBARA
QIGONG #11078
001.000.640.575.540.410.00 210.00
QIGONG #11076
001.000.640.575.540.410.00 133.00
Total :343.00
112806 7/9/2009 063137 GOODYEAR AUTO SERVICE CENTER 090102 Tire Inventory (12)
Tire Inventory (12)
511.000.657.548.680.340.30 1,115.88
Unit 93 - Tire
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 119.86
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.340.30 106.01
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 11.39
Scrap Tire Disposal090110
Scrap Tire Disposal
511.000.657.548.680.340.30 34.00
Total :1,387.14
112807 7/9/2009 071391 GRAY & OSBORNE INC 06713.00-25 E6DA.Services thru 05/30/09
E6DA.Services thru 05/30/09
125.000.640.594.750.410.00 418.77
Total :418.77
112808 7/9/2009 072819 GRIFFIN, JANET GRIFFIN0708 TRIP REFUND
REFUND FOR STUDENT TRIP
623.200.000.367.200.000.00 1,350.00
Total :1,350.00
112809 7/9/2009 072809 GUILD, PATSY 4-32675 RE: #40029189-803 UTILITY REFUND
RE: 40029189-803 Utility Refund
411.000.000.233.000.000.00 85.85
Total :85.85
112810 7/9/2009 068415 H & W EMERGENCY VEHICLES 45487 Unit 477 - Accident Repair
24Page:
Packet Page 44 of 930
07/09/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
25
1:03:45PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112810 7/9/2009 (Continued)068415 H & W EMERGENCY VEHICLES
Unit 477 - Accident Repair
511.000.657.548.680.480.00 6,199.89
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.480.00 588.99
Total :6,788.88
112811 7/9/2009 072417 HAGAN, SUSAN HAGAN0626 REFUND
CLASS REFUND
001.000.000.239.200.000.00 46.00
Total :46.00
112812 7/9/2009 072820 HANSEN, MICHELE HANSEN0708 TRIP REFUND
REFUND FOR STUDENT TRIP
623.200.000.367.200.000.00 1,350.00
Total :1,350.00
112813 7/9/2009 070515 HARLEY DAVIDSON OF SEATTLE 264833 Unit 203 - Air Filter, Jiffystand Spring
Unit 203 - Air Filter, Jiffystand Spring
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 51.16
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 4.85
Total :56.01
112814 7/9/2009 012900 HARRIS FORD INC FOCS257894 Unit 485 - Service and Repairs
Unit 485 - Service and Repairs
511.000.657.548.680.480.00 372.36
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.480.00 35.37
Total :407.73
112815 7/9/2009 010900 HD FOWLER CO INC I2548860 Water - Supply Parts
Water - Supply Parts
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 47.66
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 4.53
25Page:
Packet Page 45 of 930
07/09/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
26
1:03:45PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :52.191128157/9/2009 010900 010900 HD FOWLER CO INC
112816 7/9/2009 071368 HEFFERAN, BRIGITTE HEFFERAN11019 CALLIGRAPHY CLASSES
CALLIGRAPHY: BLACKLETTER~
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 655.20
Total :655.20
112817 7/9/2009 013500 HINGSON, ROBERT 51 LEOFF 1 Reimbursement
LEOFF 1 Reimbursement
009.000.390.517.370.230.00 23.00
Total :23.00
112818 7/9/2009 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 1280547 0205
MARKING WAND, PAINT
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 110.58
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 10.51
02051280549
PAINT
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 54.87
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 5.21
02051581418
SILICONE
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 11.94
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 1.13
02052030217
SUPPLIES
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 97.72
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 9.28
26Page:
Packet Page 46 of 930
07/09/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
27
1:03:45PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112818 7/9/2009 (Continued)067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES
02052585670
HOSE MENDER, ETC.
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 44.96
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 4.27
02053035346
SUPPLIES
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 10.91
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 1.04
02054092682
STAKES, ETC.
001.000.640.576.810.310.00 47.36
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.810.310.00 4.50
02055590311
SAWZALL, TORCH BLADE
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 45.91
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 4.36
0205562999
PVC UNIONS, SOLVENT, ETC.
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 40.03
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 3.80
02056073977
SUPPLIES
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 16.47
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 1.56
02057031581
BOSCH BIT
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 15.97
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 1.52
27Page:
Packet Page 47 of 930
07/09/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
28
1:03:45PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112818 7/9/2009 (Continued)067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES
02057034262
PRESS REGULT, LEAF RAKE
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 95.90
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 9.11
Total :648.91
112819 7/9/2009 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 4564434 6035322500959949
SURGE POTECTOR
411.000.656.538.800.310.22 7.97
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.22 0.76
60353225009599495085139
CHOP SAW/BLADES
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 222.88
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 21.17
60353225009599496588991
STAINLESS ROD
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 21.23
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 2.02
Total :276.03
112820 7/9/2009 072605 HOMEGUARD SECURITY SERVICES GI4683 Edmonds Museum Security System
Edmonds Museum Security System
001.000.651.519.920.480.00 171.00
Total :171.00
112821 7/9/2009 070896 HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 8941 Fac Maint Supplies - Paper Towels,
Fac Maint Supplies - Paper Towels,
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 282.69
Fac Maint Supplies - Latex gloves,
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 387.20
28Page:
Packet Page 48 of 930
07/09/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
29
1:03:45PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :669.891128217/9/2009 070896 070896 HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS
112822 7/9/2009 070896 HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 1293 SUPPLIES
Admin retirement
001.000.510.522.100.310.00 35.40
Operations -TV, inkjet ink
001.000.510.522.200.310.00 1,467.74
Total :1,503.14
112823 7/9/2009 072041 IBS INCORPORATED 435137-1 Shop Supplies - Drill Bits, Hex Shank
Shop Supplies - Drill Bits, Hex Shank
511.000.657.548.680.350.00 40.89
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.350.00 4.57
Freight
511.000.657.548.680.350.00 7.20
Total :52.66
112824 7/9/2009 070042 IKON FINANCIAL SERVICES 79777030 COPIER LEASE
PARK MAINTENANCE COPIER LEASE
001.000.640.576.800.450.00 26.33
Total :26.33
112825 7/9/2009 070042 IKON FINANCIAL SERVICES 79777020 Rent from 6/22-7/21/09 for reception
Rent from 6/22-7/21/09 for reception
001.000.620.558.800.450.00 31.20
Rent from 6/22-7/21/09 on large copier.79777025
Rent from 6/22-7/21/09 on large copier.
001.000.620.558.800.450.00 931.61
Rent from 6/22-7/21/09 on Engineering79777027
Rent from 6/22-7/21/09 on Engineering
001.000.620.558.800.450.00 1,834.47
Total :2,797.28
112826 7/9/2009 071634 INTEGRA TELECOM 010495174 C/A 010495174
PR1-2 City Phone Service 5/25-6/25/09
001.000.310.518.880.420.00 920.04
29Page:
Packet Page 49 of 930
07/09/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
30
1:03:45PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :920.041128267/9/2009 071634 071634 INTEGRA TELECOM
112827 7/9/2009 072803 INVITE CHANGE INVITECHANGE0629 REFUND
REFUND OF DAMAGE DEPOSIT
001.000.000.239.200.000.00 500.00
Total :500.00
112828 7/9/2009 015270 JCI JONES CHEMICALS INC 434631 54278825
HYPOCHLORITE SOLUTION
411.000.656.538.800.310.53 3,518.37
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.53 334.24
Total :3,852.61
112829 7/9/2009 072821 JENKINS, CHRISTINA JENKINS0708 TRIP REFUND
REFUND FOR STUDENT TRIP
623.200.000.367.200.000.00 1,350.00
Total :1,350.00
112830 7/9/2009 072199 JONES & STOKES ASSOCIATES INC 0063140 E7AD.Services thru 05/31/09
E7AD.Services thru 05/31/09
112.200.630.595.440.410.00 12,263.48
Total :12,263.48
112831 7/9/2009 066804 KING CO FIRE TRG OFFICERS ASSN 4524 TRAINING MISC
LJ & CK Pump Ops
001.000.510.522.400.490.00 560.00
Total :560.00
112832 7/9/2009 069355 KLEINFELDER INC 583487 E6DB.Testing thru 05/24/09
E6DB.Testing thru 05/24/09
112.200.630.595.330.410.00 605.50
Total :605.50
112833 7/9/2009 068396 KPFF CONSULTING ENGINEERS 0609-108246 E8GC.Services thru 05/31/09
E8GC.Services thru 05/31/09
412.300.630.594.320.410.00 7,488.07
30Page:
Packet Page 50 of 930
07/09/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
31
1:03:45PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112833 7/9/2009 (Continued)068396 KPFF CONSULTING ENGINEERS
E6DB.Services thru 04/30/09E2DB.37
E6DB.Services thru 04/30/09
125.000.640.594.750.410.00 7,351.31
Total :14,839.38
112834 7/9/2009 072822 KREFT, CHRISTI KREFT0708 TRIP REFUND
REFUND FOR STUDENT TRIP
623.200.000.367.200.000.00 300.00
Total :300.00
112835 7/9/2009 016850 KUKER RANKEN INC 351066-001 Survey Vest (Pam)
Survey Vest (Pam)
001.000.620.532.200.240.00 83.95
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.620.532.200.240.00 7.98
Total :91.93
112836 7/9/2009 017060 L & O DISTRIBUTING CO 80664 Sr Center - Gas Valve
Sr Center - Gas Valve
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 327.60
Freight
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 8.82
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 31.96
Total :368.38
112837 7/9/2009 017135 LANDAU ASSOCIATES INC 25200 Professional Services through 6/20/09.
Professional Services through 6/20/09.
001.000.000.245.900.621.00 2,381.76
Total :2,381.76
112838 7/9/2009 068711 LAWN EQUIPMENT SUPPLY 6009-504 REPLACEMENT PARTS
31Page:
Packet Page 51 of 930
07/09/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
32
1:03:45PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112838 7/9/2009 (Continued)068711 LAWN EQUIPMENT SUPPLY
SHAFT KIT, GEAR SHAFT, SNAP RING
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 119.11
Freight
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 13.69
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 12.62
Total :145.42
112839 7/9/2009 069634 LEXISNEXIS RISK & INF ANLY GRP 1201641-20090630 INV#1201641-20090630 EDMONDS PD
MIN CHG SEARCHES/REPORTS 6/09
001.000.410.521.210.410.00 50.00
Total :50.00
112840 7/9/2009 018980 LYNNWOOD HONDA 668187 CEMETERY PARTS
SUPPLIES FOR CEMETERY
130.000.640.536.500.310.00 22.38
9.5% Sales Tax
130.000.640.536.500.310.00 2.13
Total :24.51
112841 7/9/2009 019583 MANPOWER INC 18984176 Vacation coverage for Linda on Mon &
Vacation coverage for Linda on Mon &
001.000.620.558.800.410.00 154.19
Reception coverage on Wed. 6/24 - Linda19004750
Reception coverage on Wed. 6/24 - Linda
001.000.620.558.800.410.00 81.15
Total :235.34
112842 7/9/2009 061900 MARC 0391153-IN 00-0902224
FOAM SANITIZER
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 99.00
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 5.09
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 9.89
32Page:
Packet Page 52 of 930
07/09/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
33
1:03:45PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :113.981128427/9/2009 061900 061900 MARC
112843 7/9/2009 069362 MARSHALL, CITA 607 INTERPRETER FEE
INTERPRETER FEE
001.000.230.512.500.410.01 88.25
Total :88.25
112844 7/9/2009 072801 MCGUIRE, ANGELA 11081 GIRLS BASKETBALL CAMP
GIRLS BASKETBALL CAMP #11081
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 295.75
Total :295.75
112845 7/9/2009 066719 MCKENZIE & ADAMS INC 0072757 WORK CLOTHES
HOODED JACKETS, OVERALLS
001.000.640.576.800.240.00 196.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.240.00 18.62
Total :214.62
112846 7/9/2009 020039 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO 30706418 123106800
SUMP PUMP/SAFETYGLASSES/HOSE/USA FLAG
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 907.25
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 76.72
12310680031333963
GRINDING DISCS
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 198.30
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 7.35
12310680031468886
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 4.89
HOSE COUPLING
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 9.53
33Page:
Packet Page 53 of 930
07/09/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
34
1:03:45PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112846 7/9/2009 (Continued)020039 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO
12310680031549571
QUARTZ DISC
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 200.00
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 5.36
12310680031732198
PLUG/CONNECTOR
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 195.12
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 6.35
Total :1,610.87
112847 7/9/2009 072804 MEYER, HEIDI MEYER0701 REFUND
CLASS REFUND
001.000.000.239.200.000.00 171.00
Total :171.00
112848 7/9/2009 072223 MILLER, DOUG MILLER0701 GYM MONITOR
GYM MONITOR FOR 3 ON 3 BASKETBALL LEAGUE
001.000.640.575.520.410.00 30.00
Total :30.00
112849 7/9/2009 072746 MURRAY SMITH & ASSOCIATES 09-1030-2 E8JB.Services thru 05/31/09
E8JB.Services thru 05/31/09
412.100.630.594.320.410.00 7,242.75
Total :7,242.75
112850 7/9/2009 072741 NEWTON KIGHT LLP 56573 C/A 20027-0001M
Jun-09 Legal Services Fiber Project
001.000.310.518.870.410.00 270.00
Total :270.00
112851 7/9/2009 024960 NORTH COAST ELECTRIC COMPANY S2899389.001 2091
34Page:
Packet Page 54 of 930
07/09/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
35
1:03:45PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112851 7/9/2009 (Continued)024960 NORTH COAST ELECTRIC COMPANY
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
411.000.656.538.800.310.22 300.92
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.22 27.68
Total :328.60
112852 7/9/2009 066391 NORTHSTAR CHEMICAL INC 3264 260
SODIUM BISULFITE
411.000.656.538.800.310.54 1,067.13
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.54 101.38
Total :1,168.51
112853 7/9/2009 061013 NORTHWEST CASCADE INC 0964540 HONEY BUCKET RENTAL
HONEY BUCKET RENTAL:~
001.000.640.576.800.450.00 222.89
HONEY BUCKET RENTAL0965541
HONEY BUCKET RENTAL:~
001.000.640.576.800.450.00 271.11
HONEY BUCKET CREDIT0966471
YOST POOL CREDIT
001.000.640.576.800.450.00 -176.48
Total :317.52
112854 7/9/2009 025690 NOYES, KARIN 000 00 640 Planning Board Minutes 5/27/09.
Planning Board Minutes 5/27/09.
001.000.620.558.600.410.00 416.00
Planning Board Minutes 6/24/09.000 00 646
Planning Board Minutes 6/24/09.
001.000.620.558.600.410.00 304.00
Total :720.00
112855 7/9/2009 063511 OFFICE MAX INC 309661 INV#309661, ACCT#520437 250POL
35Page:
Packet Page 55 of 930
07/09/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
36
1:03:45PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112855 7/9/2009 (Continued)063511 OFFICE MAX INC
STAPLER
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 9.11
TAPE DISPENSER
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 7.91
HEAVY DUTY STAPLER
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 14.20
STAPLES, HEAVY DUTY
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 6.28
HP LASER JET TONER Q6511X
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 208.95
PADS, LEAGL RULE, 5X8
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 5.51
PADS, 5X11 3/4
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 12.44
CERT/DOCUMENT COVERS
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 30.14
STENO BOOKS 6X9
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 11.52
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 30.76
WITE OUT CORRECTION TAPE
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 17.78
Total :354.60
112856 7/9/2009 063511 OFFICE MAX INC 288011 Office supplies - HR
36Page:
Packet Page 56 of 930
07/09/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
37
1:03:45PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112856 7/9/2009 (Continued)063511 OFFICE MAX INC
Office supplies - HR
001.000.220.516.100.310.00 32.89
Office supplies - copy paper
001.000.220.516.100.310.00 6.63
Office supplies - copy paper
001.000.610.519.700.310.00 6.63
Office supplies - copy paper
001.000.210.513.100.310.00 6.63
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.220.516.100.310.00 4.31
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.610.519.700.310.00 0.36
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.210.513.100.310.00 0.35
Total :57.80
112857 7/9/2009 063511 OFFICE MAX INC 368734 Toner/pens/Post it notes
Toner/pens/Post it notes
001.000.310.514.230.310.00 260.04
Toner
001.000.310.518.880.310.00 97.24
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.310.514.230.310.00 24.70
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.310.518.880.310.00 9.24
Total :391.22
112858 7/9/2009 063511 OFFICE MAX INC 315784 PW Office Supplies - Pens, Air Dusters,
PW Office Supplies - Pens, Air Dusters,
001.000.650.519.910.310.00 75.16
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.650.519.910.310.00 7.15
37Page:
Packet Page 57 of 930
07/09/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
38
1:03:45PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112858 7/9/2009 (Continued)063511 OFFICE MAX INC
PW Admin - Mouse pad322534
PW Admin - Mouse pad
001.000.650.519.910.310.00 6.61
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.650.519.910.310.00 0.63
Total :89.55
112859 7/9/2009 063511 OFFICE MAX INC 273323 Misc. office supplies including binders
Misc. office supplies including binders
001.000.620.558.800.310.00 298.41
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.620.558.800.310.00 28.36
Misc. office supplies including Brother390930
Misc. office supplies including Brother
001.000.620.558.800.310.00 234.33
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.620.558.800.310.00 22.26
Total :583.36
112860 7/9/2009 063511 OFFICE MAX INC 274364 Office Supplies for Council Office
Office Supplies for Council Office
001.000.110.511.100.310.00 180.91
Total :180.91
112861 7/9/2009 063511 OFFICE MAX INC 291031 ADMIN SUPPLIES
office supplies
001.000.510.522.100.310.00 1,277.25
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.100.310.00 120.47
Total :1,397.72
112862 7/9/2009 063511 OFFICE MAX INC 90624 ALS PROF SERVICES
38Page:
Packet Page 58 of 930
07/09/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
39
1:03:45PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112862 7/9/2009 (Continued)063511 OFFICE MAX INC
privacy form printing
001.000.510.526.100.410.00 230.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.510.526.100.410.00 21.85
Total :251.85
112863 7/9/2009 026200 OLYMPIC VIEW WATER DISTRICT 0002920 WATER FOR L/S #13
WATER FOR L/S #13
411.000.655.535.800.470.00 26.41
FIRE STATION #20002140 0
FIRE STATION #20
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 173.14
Total :199.55
112864 7/9/2009 072539 OTAK INC-WASHINGTON 060987299 E8FA.Services thru06/05/09
E8FA.Services thru06/05/09
412.200.630.594.320.410.00 1,000.00
Total :1,000.00
112865 7/9/2009 066817 PANASONIC DIGITAL DOCUMENT COM 011041921 COPIER CONTRACT
COPIER CONTRACT
411.000.656.538.800.450.41 145.22
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.450.41 13.45
Total :158.67
112866 7/9/2009 066412 PARKS & RECREATION DAYCAMP CAMPCASH070809 DAYCAMP PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
DAYCAMP SUPPLIES
001.000.640.575.530.310.00 50.13
DAYCAMP TRANSPORTATION
001.000.640.575.530.430.00 24.50
Total :74.63
112867 7/9/2009 008400 PETTY CASH - EPD PETTY CASH 7-1-09 PETTY CASH - ADMIN - 7-1-09
39Page:
Packet Page 59 of 930
07/09/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
40
1:03:45PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112867 7/9/2009 (Continued)008400 PETTY CASH - EPD
PARKING-COMPTON-TRAINING 1/26/09
001.000.410.521.400.430.00 25.00
PARKING-COMPTON-TRAINING 1/27/09
001.000.410.521.400.430.00 25.00
STAPLES FOR SHOOTING RANGE
001.000.410.521.400.310.00 4.35
SHOOTING RANGE SUPPLIES
001.000.410.521.400.310.00 8.67
PARKING AT COURT CASE 07-3518
001.000.410.521.210.430.00 6.00
COOKIES-4/28 POLICE FOUNDATION MTG
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 10.98
GLASS FOR LAB (PHOTOGRAPHY)
001.000.410.521.910.310.00 17.37
BORE & GUN CLEANER - ARMORY
001.000.410.521.400.310.00 26.97
BUCKETS W/LIDS FOR SHOOTING RANGE
001.000.410.521.400.310.00 18.00
COOKIES-5/26 POLICE FOUNDATION MTG
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 7.98
MAIL CD TO KEATING, BUCKLIN
001.000.410.521.100.420.00 1.39
COOKIES-6/23 POLICE FOUNDATION MTG.
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 5.98
FRAME FOR BARKER'S CERTIFICATE
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 48.16
FERRY TO KINGSTON CASE 09-2299
001.000.410.521.210.430.00 21.15
FERRY FROM KINGSTON CASE 09-2299
001.000.410.521.210.430.00 14.45
Total :241.45
112868 7/9/2009 008350 PETTY CASH - PARKS & REC PCASH0707 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
40Page:
Packet Page 60 of 930
07/09/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
41
1:03:45PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112868 7/9/2009 (Continued)008350 PETTY CASH - PARKS & REC
FERRY FOR HIKING TRIP
001.000.640.574.350.430.00 8.60
FLAG POLE FOR SEABEE FLAG FOR MEMORIAL
130.000.640.536.500.310.00 13.13
REFRESHMENTS FOR PLANTING HELP
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 18.75
GYMNASTICS SUPPLIES:~
001.000.640.575.550.310.00 17.48
MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT FOR DISCOVERY
001.000.640.574.350.430.00 57.20
GYMNASTICS SUPPLIES:~
001.000.640.575.550.310.00 44.64
GUEST BOOK FOR RANGER VISITORS STATION
001.000.640.574.350.310.00 6.56
SHRIP TO FEED TOUCH TANK ANIMALS
001.000.640.574.350.310.00 3.76
SUPPLIES FOR VISITOR'S STATION
001.000.640.574.350.310.00 8.75
PAPER AND PRINTING FOR MEMORIAL DAY
130.000.640.536.500.310.00 61.32
Total :240.19
112869 7/9/2009 008475 PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORKS 6/1-6/30/09 PW - City Attorney Meeting Parking - N
41Page:
Packet Page 61 of 930
07/09/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
42
1:03:45PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112869 7/9/2009 (Continued)008475 PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORKS
PW - City Attorney Meeting Parking - N
001.000.650.519.910.430.00 16.00
FAC - Elect Parts - D Startzman
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 1.48
Street - Maint Summit Meeting Fees - T
111.000.653.542.900.490.00 10.00
PW Supplies
111.000.653.542.900.310.00 4.70
PW Supplies
411.000.652.542.900.310.00 4.70
PW Supplies
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 4.70
PW Supplies
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 4.70
PW Supplies
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 4.68
Water - CDL Endorsement - R Shore
411.000.654.534.800.490.00 30.00
Sewer - Sewer TV Truck Keyboard Liner -
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 5.74
Sewer - Sewer TV Truck Computer Chair -
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 76.64
Unit 775,775 Lic Fees - D Sittauer
511.100.657.594.480.640.00 97.75
Total :261.09
112870 7/9/2009 071811 PONY MAIL BOX & BUSINESS CTR 177183 INV#177183 ACCT#2772 - EDMONDS PD
SHIPPING VESTS TO RECYCLE
001.000.410.521.100.420.00 73.28
Total :73.28
112871 7/9/2009 071811 PONY MAIL BOX & BUSINESS CTR 177065 PW Dept of L&I Safety Video return
42Page:
Packet Page 62 of 930
07/09/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
43
1:03:45PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112871 7/9/2009 (Continued)071811 PONY MAIL BOX & BUSINESS CTR
PW Dept of L&I Safety Video return
111.000.653.542.900.420.00 2.17
PW Dept of L&I Safety Video return
411.000.652.542.900.420.00 2.17
PW Dept of L&I Safety Video return
411.000.654.534.800.420.00 2.17
PW Dept of L&I Safety Video return
411.000.655.535.800.420.00 2.18
PW Dept of L&I Safety Video return177229
PW Dept of L&I Safety Video return
111.000.653.542.900.420.00 2.16
PW Dept of L&I Safety Video return
411.000.652.542.900.420.00 2.16
PW Dept of L&I Safety Video return
411.000.654.534.800.420.00 2.16
PW Dept of L&I Safety Video return
411.000.655.535.800.420.00 2.14
PW Dept of L&I Safety Video return177364
PW Dept of L&I Safety Video return
111.000.653.542.900.420.00 2.23
PW Dept of L&I Safety Video return
411.000.652.542.900.420.00 2.23
PW Dept of L&I Safety Video return
411.000.654.534.800.420.00 2.23
PW Dept of L&I Safety Video return
411.000.655.535.800.420.00 2.24
Total :26.24
112872 7/9/2009 064088 PROTECTION ONE 2010551 MCC
24 hour alarm monitoring MCC
001.000.651.519.920.420.00 99.00
Total :99.00
112873 7/9/2009 068697 PUBLIC SAFETY TESTING INC 2008-2511 July - Sept. 2008 quarterly fees
43Page:
Packet Page 63 of 930
07/09/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
44
1:03:45PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112873 7/9/2009 (Continued)068697 PUBLIC SAFETY TESTING INC
July - Sept. 2008 quarterly fees
001.000.220.516.210.410.00 700.00
Total :700.00
112874 7/9/2009 046900 PUGET SOUND ENERGY 7918807004 YOST POOL
YOST POOL
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 4,286.85
Total :4,286.85
112875 7/9/2009 046900 PUGET SOUND ENERGY 084-904-700-6 PUGET SOUND ENERGY
PUGET SOUND ENERGY
411.000.656.538.800.472.63 57.60
Total :57.60
112876 7/9/2009 046900 PUGET SOUND ENERGY 0101874006 LIBRARY
LIBRARY
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 32.02
PARK & BUILDING MAINTENANCE SHOP0230757007
PARK & BUILDING MAINTENANCE SHOP
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 81.74
LIFT STATION #71916766007
LIFT STATION #7
411.000.655.535.800.470.00 33.81
PUBLIC SAFETY-POLICE,CRT & COUNCIL2753166004
PUBLIC SAFETY-POLICE,CRT & COUNCEL
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 347.87
44Page:
Packet Page 64 of 930
07/09/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
45
1:03:45PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112876 7/9/2009 (Continued)046900 PUGET SOUND ENERGY
Public Works2776365005
Public Works
001.000.650.519.910.470.00 6.21
Public Works
111.000.653.542.900.470.00 23.59
Public Works
411.000.654.534.800.470.00 23.59
Public Works
411.000.655.535.800.470.00 23.59
Public Works
511.000.657.548.680.470.00 23.59
Public Works
411.000.652.542.900.470.00 23.57
200 Dayton St-Vacant PW Bldg3689976003
200 Dayton St-Vacant PW Bldg
411.000.654.534.800.470.00 72.58
MEADOWDALE CLUBHOUSE5254926008
MEADOWDALE CLUBHOUSE
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 160.13
Fire Station # 165322323139
Fire Station # 16
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 129.36
SEWER LIFT STATION #95672895009
SEWER LIFT STATION #9
411.000.655.535.800.470.00 32.00
PUBLIC SAFETY-FIRE STATION6439566008
PUBLIC SAFETY-FIRE STATION
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 199.51
ANDERSON CENTER6490327001
ANDERSON CENTER
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 885.76
LIFT STATION #88851908007
LIFT STATION #8
411.000.655.535.800.470.00 54.94
45Page:
Packet Page 65 of 930
07/09/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
46
1:03:45PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112876 7/9/2009 (Continued)046900 PUGET SOUND ENERGY
FIRE STATION #209919661109
FIRE STATION #20
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 117.11
Total :2,270.97
112877 7/9/2009 009898 PULL A PART 1015349 TRAINING SUPPLIES
cars for training
001.000.510.522.400.310.00 1,800.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.400.310.00 171.00
Total :1,971.00
112878 7/9/2009 065579 QUIKSIGN 57696 Dedonker/S-09-34 Sign Installation.
Dedonker/S-09-34 Sign Installation.
001.000.620.558.600.410.11 169.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.620.558.600.410.11 16.06
Total :185.06
112879 7/9/2009 063452 RADIO SHACK CORPORATION 020130 Camera Card Reader
Camera Card Reader
001.000.620.558.800.310.00 12.99
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.620.558.800.310.00 1.23
Camera Card Reader020557
Camera Card Reader
001.000.620.558.800.310.00 12.99
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.620.558.800.310.00 1.23
Total :28.44
112880 7/9/2009 072823 RAI, JAMMETT RAI0708 TRIP REFUND
REFUND FOR STUDENT TRIP
623.200.000.367.200.000.00 1,350.00
Total :1,350.00
46Page:
Packet Page 66 of 930
07/09/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
47
1:03:45PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112881 7/9/2009 072254 RIVER OAKS COMMUNICATIONS CORP 06292009 VERIZON/FRONTIER TRANSFER NEGOTIATIONS
Verizon/Frontier franchise transfer
001.000.390.519.900.410.00 446.56
Total :446.56
112882 7/9/2009 072805 ROSEBROOK, CARLA ROSEBROOK0701 REFUND
POINT OF SALE REFUND
001.000.000.239.200.000.00 125.00
Total :125.00
112883 7/9/2009 071979 SACKVILLE, JODI L 6/25/09 OT from sick leave not bought back
OT from sick leave not bought back
001.000.410.521.220.110.00 79.17
Total :79.17
112884 7/9/2009 072802 SCIENCE EXPRESS LLC SCIENCE10859 PRESCHOOL SCIENCE CAMP
PRESCHOOL SCIENCE CAMP~
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 805.00
Total :805.00
112885 7/9/2009 060855 SILVER LAKE TROPHY &17176 Humanitarian of the Year 2009
Humanitarian of the Year 2009
001.000.210.513.100.310.00 57.95
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.210.513.100.310.00 5.51
Total :63.46
112886 7/9/2009 068489 SIRENNET.COM 0097697-IN Unit 486 - Strobe Tube Assemblies (2)
Unit 486 - Strobe Tube Assemblies (2)
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 127.40
Freight
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 13.75
Total :141.15
112887 7/9/2009 036850 SMITH, SHERLUND D 50 LEOFF 1 Reimbursement
LEOFF 1 Reimbursement
009.000.390.517.370.230.00 150.00
47Page:
Packet Page 67 of 930
07/09/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
48
1:03:45PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :150.001128877/9/2009 036850 036850 SMITH, SHERLUND D
112888 7/9/2009 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 2180017895 BEACON LIGHT CROSS WALK
BEACON LIGHT CROSS WALK
111.000.653.542.640.470.00 35.68
SIGNAL LIGHT2340018510
SIGNAL LIGHT
111.000.653.542.640.470.00 73.23
SIGNAL LIGHT2710014826
SIGNAL LIGHT
111.000.653.542.640.470.00 53.42
SIGNAL LIGHT2900012432
SIGNAL LIGHT
111.000.653.542.640.470.00 30.39
DECORATIVE LIGHTS 115 2ND AVE S3260494996
deocrative lighting
111.000.653.542.630.470.00 30.49
SIGNAL LIGHT3630019994
SIGNAL LIGHT
111.000.653.542.640.470.00 43.45
Ballinger Lift Station 7403 Ballinger3900430020
Ballinger Lift Station 7403 Ballinger
411.000.655.535.800.470.00 30.89
STREET LIGHT4220016176
STREET LIGHT
111.000.653.542.630.470.00 39.83
FIRE STATION #204650022645
FIRE STATION #20
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 745.25
Lift Station #6 100 Pine St4670302498
Lift Station #6 100 Pine St
411.000.655.535.800.470.00 192.06
SIGNAL LIGHT5240017631
SIGNAL LIGHT
111.000.653.542.640.470.00 36.44
48Page:
Packet Page 68 of 930
07/09/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
49
1:03:45PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112888 7/9/2009 (Continued)037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1
SIGNAL LIGHT5450010938
SIGNAL LIGHT
111.000.653.542.640.470.00 95.38
LIFT STATION #15720013258
LIFT STATION #1
411.000.655.535.800.470.00 838.75
Total :2,245.26
112889 7/9/2009 038300 SOUND DISPOSAL CO 03587/0630 DUMP FEES
PARK MAINTENANCE DUMP FEELS
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 670.50
Total :670.50
112890 7/9/2009 038300 SOUND DISPOSAL CO 03583 garbage & recycle for PS
garbage & recycle for PS
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 550.74
garbage & recycle for FAC03585
garbage & recycle for FAC
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 674.47
garbage & recycle for Library03586
garbage & recycle for Library
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 555.23
garbage & recycle-City Hall03588
garbage & recycle-City Hall
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 459.89
Total :2,240.33
112891 7/9/2009 069997 SRI TECHNOLOGIES INC 96009 E5MC.Roberts thru 06/13/09
49Page:
Packet Page 69 of 930
07/09/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
50
1:03:45PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112891 7/9/2009 (Continued)069997 SRI TECHNOLOGIES INC
E5MC.Roberts thru 06/13/09
125.000.640.594.750.410.00 227.50
E9CA.Roberts thru 06/13/09
112.200.630.595.330.410.00 585.00
E3JB.Roberts thru 06/13/09
412.100.630.594.320.410.00 195.00
E4GA.Roberts thru 06/13/09
412.300.630.594.320.410.00 65.00
E5MC/E4GA.Roberts Mileage
412.300.630.594.320.410.00 14.22
E5MC/E4GA.Roberts Mileage
125.000.640.594.750.410.00 14.22
Total :1,100.94
112892 7/9/2009 071463 SRS SYSTEMS INC 20090365 Labor & Parts to repair endorser
Labor & Parts to repair endorser
001.000.310.514.230.480.00 652.02
Freight
001.000.310.514.230.480.00 100.00
Total :752.02
112893 7/9/2009 060371 STANDARD INSURANCE CO 6/22/09 Disability premiums 4/1 - 6/30/09.
Disability premiums 4/1 - 6/30/09.
001.000.220.516.100.410.00 121.50
Total :121.50
112894 7/9/2009 039775 STATE AUDITOR'S OFFICE L77567 MAY-09 AUDIT FEES
50Page:
Packet Page 70 of 930
07/09/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
51
1:03:45PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112894 7/9/2009 (Continued)039775 STATE AUDITOR'S OFFICE
May-09 Audit Fees
001.000.390.519.900.510.00 13,086.09
May-09 Audit Fees
411.000.652.542.900.510.00 545.25
May-09 Audit Fees
411.000.654.534.800.510.00 2,181.02
May-09 Audit Fees
411.000.655.535.800.510.00 2,181.02
May-09 Audit Fees
411.000.656.538.800.510.00 2,181.02
May-09 Audit Fees
111.000.653.543.300.510.00 545.25
May-09 Audit Fees
511.000.657.548.680.510.00 1,090.50
Total :21,810.15
112895 7/9/2009 040430 STONEWAY ELECTRIC SUPPLY 1905656 PS - Elect Supplies
PS - Elect Supplies
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 46.90
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 4.46
FAC - Elect Supplies1908502
FAC - Elect Supplies
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 296.52
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 28.17
Total :376.05
112896 7/9/2009 072808 STROMME, PAUL & SHAWN 3-54850 RE: #10-28789 UTILITY REFUND
RE: #10-28789 Utility Refund
411.000.000.233.000.000.00 91.06
Total :91.06
112897 7/9/2009 068619 SWENSON, LINDA 1193 CRAZE COVER PHOTO
51Page:
Packet Page 71 of 930
07/09/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
52
1:03:45PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112897 7/9/2009 (Continued)068619 SWENSON, LINDA
CRAZE SEPT - DEC 2009~
001.000.640.574.200.490.00 68.37
Total :68.37
112898 7/9/2009 072555 SYSTEMS DESIGN ED0609 ALS PROF SERVICES
EMS billing
001.000.510.526.100.410.00 3,028.52
Total :3,028.52
112899 7/9/2009 072772 T E BRIGGS CONSTRUCTION CO E6DB.Pmt 2 E6DB.Prog Pmt 2 thru 06/30/09
E6DB.Prog Pmt 2 thru 06/30/09
112.200.630.595.330.650.00 82,435.71
E6DB.Retainage Pmt 2
112.200.000.223.400.000.00 -4,121.79
Total :78,313.92
112900 7/9/2009 072404 TELEDYNE ISCO INC 896085 POWER PACK
POWER PACK
411.000.656.538.800.310.22 440.00
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.22 15.00
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.22 43.23
Total :498.23
112901 7/9/2009 009350 THE DAILY HERALD COMPANY 108763-6/30/2009 ADVERTISING
SPLASH PULLOUT
001.000.640.574.200.440.00 530.00
Total :530.00
112902 7/9/2009 027269 THE PART WORKS INC 261116 HAND DRYER SYSTEM
52Page:
Packet Page 72 of 930
07/09/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
53
1:03:45PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112902 7/9/2009 (Continued)027269 THE PART WORKS INC
HAND DRYER SYSTEM
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 620.00
Freight
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 12.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 60.04
Total :692.04
112903 7/9/2009 038315 THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR 175913 CITY HALL ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE
CITY HALL ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE
001.000.651.519.920.480.00 844.04
001.000.651.519.920.480.00 80.18
MONITORING-PS175914
monitoring-PS
001.000.651.519.920.480.00 39.68
SENIOR CENTER ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE186273
SENIOR CENTER ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE
001.000.651.519.920.480.00 146.76
001.000.651.519.920.480.00 13.94
SENIOR CENTER ELEVATOR MONITORING186274
SENIOR CENTER ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE
001.000.651.519.920.480.00 11.94
Total :1,136.54
112904 7/9/2009 070767 UNITED RENTALS NW INC 81970703-001 Water - Railroad Spikes for road plates
Water - Railroad Spikes for road plates
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 48.00
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 4.56
Total :52.56
112905 7/9/2009 062693 US BANK 3470 Travel - LP Miller & M Moore Analysis
53Page:
Packet Page 73 of 930
07/09/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
54
1:03:45PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112905 7/9/2009 (Continued)062693 US BANK
Travel - LP Miller & M Moore Analysis
001.000.410.521.400.430.00 627.15
Travel - LP Miller & M Moore PNWDIAI
001.000.410.521.400.430.00 838.19
Total :1,465.34
112906 7/9/2009 069592 USA MOBILITY WIRELESS S0298897F INV#S0298897F EDMONDS PD
PAGERS 06/27/09 - 07/26/09
001.000.410.521.100.420.00 167.06
Total :167.06
112907 7/9/2009 072824 VARGAS, VIRGINIA VARGAS0708 TRIP REFUND
REFUND FOR STUDENT TRIP
623.200.000.367.200.000.00 1,350.00
Total :1,350.00
112908 7/9/2009 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST 425-712-0647 IRRIGATION SYSTEM
IRRIGATION SYSTEM
001.000.640.576.800.420.00 44.56
Total :44.56
112909 7/9/2009 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST 425 NW1-0155 03 0210 1099569419 02
TELEMETRY
411.000.656.538.800.420.00 218.12
03 0210 1014522641 07425-771-5553
AUTO DIALER
411.000.656.538.800.420.00 75.56
03 0210 1079569413 10425-NW1-0060
BPS TELEMETRY
411.000.656.538.800.420.00 41.48
Total :335.16
112910 7/9/2009 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST 425-206-1108 TELEMETRY LIFT STATIONS
54Page:
Packet Page 74 of 930
07/09/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
55
1:03:45PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112910 7/9/2009 (Continued)011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST
TELEMETRY LIFT STATIONS
411.000.654.534.800.420.00 145.47
TELEMETRY LIFT STATIONS
411.000.655.535.800.420.00 270.16
SEAVIEW RESERVOIR425-206-1137
SEAVIEW RESERVOIR
411.000.654.534.800.420.00 26.50
TELEMETRY LIFT STATION425-206-1141
TELEMETRY LIFT STATION
411.000.654.534.800.420.00 18.53
TELEMETRY LIFT STATION
411.000.655.535.800.420.00 34.41
TELEMETRY LIFT STATION425-206-4810
TELEMETRY LIFT STATION
411.000.654.534.800.420.00 42.32
TELEMETRY LIFT STATION
411.000.655.535.800.420.00 78.58
LIFT STATION #1425-673-5978
Lift Station #1
411.000.655.535.800.420.00 49.76
PUBLIC SAFETY BLDG ELEVATOR PHONE425-712-8347
PUBLIC SAFETY BLDG ELEVATOR PHONE
001.000.651.519.920.420.00 58.25
FS # 16425-771-0158
FS #16
001.000.651.519.920.420.00 232.99
FRANCES ANDERSON FIRE ALARM SYSTEM425-776-3896
FRANCES ANDERSON FIRE ALARM SYSTEM
001.000.651.519.920.420.00 117.15
VACANT PW BLDG 200 DAYTON ST425-778-3297
VACANT PW BLDG 200 DAYTON ST
411.000.654.534.800.420.00 18.68
VACANT PW BLDG 200 DAYTON ST
411.000.655.535.800.420.00 34.69
55Page:
Packet Page 75 of 930
07/09/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
56
1:03:45PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :1,127.491129107/9/2009 011900 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST
112911 7/9/2009 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST 425-771-0152 FS #16-FAX LINE
FS #16-FAX LINE
001.000.510.522.200.420.00 52.73
FS #20 PHONE SERVICE425-778-2153
FS #20 PHONE SERVICE
001.000.510.522.200.420.00 49.67
FS #16 FRAME RELAY425-FLO-0017
FS #16 FRAME RELAY
001.000.510.528.600.420.00 357.44
FRAME RELAY FOR FS #20 & SNOCOM425-NW4-3726
FRAME RELAY FOR FS #20 & SNOCOM
001.000.510.528.600.420.00 247.00
Total :706.84
112912 7/9/2009 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS 0774231998 INV#0774231998, ACCT#470497482-00001
CELL PHONES - NARCS
104.000.410.521.210.420.00 121.84
Total :121.84
112913 7/9/2009 067216 VIKING AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER CO 38650 PW - Annual Sprinkler Test
56Page:
Packet Page 76 of 930
07/09/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
57
1:03:45PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112913 7/9/2009 (Continued)067216 VIKING AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER CO
PW - Annual Sprinkler Test
001.000.650.519.910.480.00 67.50
PW - Annual Sprinkler Test
111.000.653.542.900.480.00 67.50
PW - Annual Sprinkler Test
411.000.652.542.900.480.00 67.50
PW - Annual Sprinkler Test
411.000.654.534.800.480.00 67.50
PW - Annual Sprinkler Test
411.000.655.535.800.480.00 67.50
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.650.519.910.480.00 6.41
9.5% Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.900.480.00 6.41
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.652.542.900.480.00 6.41
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.480.00 6.41
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.480.00 6.42
Boys & Girls Club- Annual Sprinkler Test38651
Boys & Girls Club- Annual Sprinkler Test
001.000.651.519.920.480.00 280.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.480.00 26.60
SR Center - Annual Sprinkler Test38652
SR Center - Annual Sprinkler Test
001.000.651.519.920.480.00 280.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.480.00 26.60
57Page:
Packet Page 77 of 930
07/09/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
58
1:03:45PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112913 7/9/2009 (Continued)067216 VIKING AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER CO
PW Fleet - Annual Sprinkler Test38653
PW Fleet - Annual Sprinkler Test
511.000.657.548.680.480.00 280.00
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.480.00 26.60
FAC - Annual Sprinkler Test38654
FAC - Annual Sprinkler Test
001.000.651.519.920.480.00 280.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.480.00 26.60
FS 20 - Annual Sprinkler Test38655
FS 20 - Annual Sprinkler Test
001.000.651.519.920.480.00 280.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.480.00 26.60
FS 17 - Annual Sprinkler Test38656
FS 17 - Annual Sprinkler Test
001.000.651.519.920.480.00 280.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.480.00 26.60
FS 16 - Annual Sprinkler Test38657
FS 16 - Annual Sprinkler Test
001.000.651.519.920.480.00 337.50
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.480.00 32.06
Total :2,578.72
112914 7/9/2009 047605 WA ST TREASURER 2ND QTR 2009 EDMONDS FORFEITURES - 2ND QTR 2009
2ND QTR/PROCEEDS/CASH
104.000.000.237.100.000.00 288.00
2ND QTR/PROCEEDS/PROPERTY
001.000.000.237.240.000.00 0.15
EDMONDS FORFEITURES - 2ND QTR 20092ND QTR 2009
2ND QTR/PROCEEDS/CASH
104.000.000.237.100.000.00 1.11
58Page:
Packet Page 78 of 930
07/09/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
59
1:03:45PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :289.261129147/9/2009 047605 047605 WA ST TREASURER
112915 7/9/2009 065035 WASHINGTON STATE PATROL F0900472 TRAINING MISC
CK,JM,DO,CS
001.000.510.522.400.490.00 400.00
Total :400.00
112916 7/9/2009 061395 WASTE MANAGEMENT NW 5641547-2677-7 201-0170717-2677-6
ASH DISPOSAL
411.000.656.538.800.474.65 3,021.48
Total :3,021.48
112917 7/9/2009 072000 WCI 091811448 C/A 00100362301
Jul 09 Fiber Optic Internet Connection
001.000.310.518.870.420.00 2,800.00
Total :2,800.00
112918 7/9/2009 068106 WELCOME COMMUNICATIONS 6561 OPS COMMUNICATIONS
Charger adapter plates
001.000.510.522.200.420.00 50.00
Freight
001.000.510.522.200.420.00 7.41
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.200.420.00 5.45
Total :62.86
112919 7/9/2009 072806 WELLS FARGO BANK Bus Lic Ref BUS LIC REF CST #00005061
Bus Lic Ref Cst #00005061
001.000.000.257.310.000.00 75.00
Total :75.00
112920 7/9/2009 065535 WESTERN FACILITIES SUPPLY 348843-01 INV#348843-01 CUST#701480 - EDMONDS PD
BLK POLYETHYLENE CAN LINERS
001.000.410.521.910.310.00 131.85
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.910.310.00 12.53
59Page:
Packet Page 79 of 930
07/09/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
60
1:03:45PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :144.381129207/9/2009 065535 065535 WESTERN FACILITIES SUPPLY
112921 7/9/2009 072807 WISE, CARMELITA 5-08600 RE: #30025297 UTILITY REFUND
RE: 30025297 Utility Refund
411.000.000.233.000.000.00 63.25
Total :63.25
112922 7/9/2009 064213 WSSUA TREASURER 407 UMPIRING
UMPIRING OF MENS AND CO-ED LEAGUE GAMES
001.000.640.575.520.410.00 2,430.00
Total :2,430.00
Bank total :322,062.87188 Vouchers for bank code :front
322,062.87Total vouchers :Vouchers in this report188
60Page:
Packet Page 80 of 930
07/16/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
1
12:58:02PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112923 7/16/2009 061029 ABSOLUTE GRAPHIX 709445 DAYCAMP T-SHIRTS
DAYCAMP T-SHIRTS
001.000.640.575.530.310.00 105.80
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.575.530.310.00 10.05
Total :115.85
112924 7/16/2009 066417 AIRGAS NOR PAC INC 101880134 M5Z34
CAL GAS
411.000.656.538.800.310.22 25.00
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.22 2.38
M5Z34101892094
CYLINDER RENTAL
411.000.656.538.800.450.21 54.52
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.450.21 5.18
Total :87.08
112925 7/16/2009 000850 ALDERWOOD WATER DISTRICT 8740 MONTHLY WHOLESALE WATER CHARGES FOR
MONTHLY WHOLESALE WATER CHARGES FOR
411.000.654.534.800.330.00 182,742.33
Total :182,742.33
112926 7/16/2009 061540 ALLIED WASTE SERVICES 0197-001107100 FIRE STATION #20
FIRE STATION #20
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 119.07
garbage for F/S #160197-001107257
garbage for F/S #16
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 124.75
garbage for MCC0197-001107944
garbage for MCC
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 57.40
Total :301.22
1Page:
Packet Page 81 of 930
07/16/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
2
12:58:02PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112927 7/16/2009 064246 ALS LABORATORY GROUP 32-0906131-0 Good Hope Pond Soil Analysis
Good Hope Pond Soil Analysis
411.000.652.542.900.410.00 649.00
Total :649.00
112928 7/16/2009 066025 ANDERSON, ANGIE AANDERSON0710 MONITORING
PLAZA ROOM AND ANDERSON CENTER GYM
001.000.640.574.100.410.00 355.00
Total :355.00
112929 7/16/2009 069751 ARAMARK 655-4375031 UNIFORM SERVICES
PARK MAINTENANCE UNIFORM SERVICES
001.000.640.576.800.240.00 34.04
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.240.00 3.23
Total :37.27
112930 7/16/2009 069751 ARAMARK 655-4362827 21580001
UNIFORM SERVICES
411.000.656.538.800.240.00 92.51
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.240.00 8.79
21580001655-4375034
UNIFORM SERVICES
411.000.656.538.800.240.00 92.67
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.240.00 8.80
Total :202.77
112931 7/16/2009 069751 ARAMARK 655-4375032 Fac Maint Uniform Svc
Fac Maint Uniform Svc
001.000.651.519.920.240.00 40.44
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.240.00 3.84
2Page:
Packet Page 82 of 930
07/16/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
3
12:58:02PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112931 7/16/2009 (Continued)069751 ARAMARK
PW Mats655-4379527
PW Mats
001.000.650.519.910.410.00 1.75
PW Mats
111.000.653.542.900.410.00 6.65
PW Mats
411.000.652.542.900.410.00 6.65
PW Mats
411.000.654.534.800.410.00 6.65
PW Mats
411.000.655.535.800.410.00 6.65
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.652.542.900.410.00 0.63
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.410.00 0.63
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.410.00 0.63
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.410.00 0.64
PW Mats
511.000.657.548.680.410.00 6.65
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.650.519.910.410.00 0.17
9.5% Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.900.410.00 0.63
Total :82.61
112932 7/16/2009 064343 AT&T 425-774-0944 STATION #20 FAX
STATION #20 FAX
001.000.510.522.200.420.00 41.03
Total :41.03
112933 7/16/2009 001777 AURORA PLUMBING & ELECTRIC 160727 Plaza - Supplies
3Page:
Packet Page 83 of 930
07/16/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
4
12:58:02PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112933 7/16/2009 (Continued)001777 AURORA PLUMBING & ELECTRIC
Plaza - Supplies
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 41.76
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 3.97
Plaza - Parts returned161374
Plaza - Parts returned
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 -13.95
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 -1.33
Total :30.45
112934 7/16/2009 001801 AUTOMATIC WILBERT VAULT CO 9811 BURIAL SUPPLIES
BURIAL SUPPLIES: SALTER
130.000.640.536.200.340.00 388.00
Total :388.00
112935 7/16/2009 001835 AWARDS SERVICE INC 72171 ARTWORK PLAQUES
ARTWORK PLAQUES
117.200.640.575.500.490.00 165.22
Freight
117.200.640.575.500.490.00 4.07
9.5% Sales Tax
117.200.640.575.500.490.00 16.09
Total :185.38
112936 7/16/2009 072319 BEACH CAMP LLC BEACHCAMP10877 WATER SPORTS BEACH CAMP
WATER SPORTS BEACH CAMP~
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 1,652.00
Total :1,652.00
112937 7/16/2009 069218 BISHOP, PAUL 165 WEB SITE MAINTENANCE
4Page:
Packet Page 84 of 930
07/16/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
5
12:58:02PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112937 7/16/2009 (Continued)069218 BISHOP, PAUL
Web Site Maintenance 6/15-7/15/09
001.000.310.518.880.410.00 390.00
Update and modify web site.
001.000.310.518.880.410.00 840.67
Update and modify Engineering Div of
001.000.620.532.200.410.00 130.00
Total :1,360.67
112938 7/16/2009 002805 BRANCHEAU, NANCY BRANCHEAU10973 CRAFTS & CLAY CLASSES
CRAFTS EXPLORATION~
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 420.00
CLAY DESIGN #10975
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 516.75
CLAY DESIGN #10977
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 180.00
Total :1,116.75
112939 7/16/2009 068368 BROCK ENTERPRISES INC 0107238-IN YOST POOL VACUUM
YOST POOL VACUUM
125.000.640.576.800.310.00 1,195.00
Freight
125.000.640.576.800.310.00 144.10
Total :1,339.10
112940 7/16/2009 003001 BUILDERS SAND & GRAVEL 289143 Water/Sewer/Street - Sand & Gravel
5Page:
Packet Page 85 of 930
07/16/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
6
12:58:02PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112940 7/16/2009 (Continued)003001 BUILDERS SAND & GRAVEL
Water/Sewer/Street - Sand & Gravel
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 823.81
Water/Sewer/Street - Sand & Gravel
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 823.81
Water/Sewer/Street - Sand & Gravel
111.000.653.542.310.310.00 1,647.60
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 78.26
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 78.26
9.5% Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.310.310.00 156.53
Total :3,608.27
112941 7/16/2009 071766 CAMPBELL, CONNIE CAMPBELL10862 INTRODUCTORY KAYAKING CLASS
INTRODUCTORY KAYAKING @ MARINA BEACH
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 200.90
Total :200.90
112942 7/16/2009 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY RN06091050 GYMNASTICS HELIUM
HELIUM FOR GYMNASTICS BALLOONS
001.000.640.575.550.450.00 16.60
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.575.550.450.00 1.58
Total :18.18
112943 7/16/2009 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY LY146120 ALS SUPPLIES
medical oxygen
001.000.510.526.100.310.00 45.96
Freight
001.000.510.526.100.310.00 17.50
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.510.526.100.310.00 6.03
6Page:
Packet Page 86 of 930
07/16/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7
12:58:02PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112943 7/16/2009 (Continued)003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY
ALS SUPPLIESLY146121
medical oxygen
001.000.510.526.100.310.00 123.95
Freight
001.000.510.526.100.310.00 17.50
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.510.526.100.310.00 13.43
ALS SUPPLIESLY146122
medical oxygen
001.000.510.526.100.310.00 34.47
Freight
001.000.510.526.100.310.00 17.50
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.510.526.100.310.00 4.93
Total :281.27
112944 7/16/2009 064840 CHAPUT, KAREN E CHAPUT11112 FRIDAY NIGHT OUT
FRIDAY NIGHT OUT #11112
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 39.20
Total :39.20
112945 7/16/2009 066382 CINTAS CORPORATION 460464767 OPS UNIFORMS
Stn. 20
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 126.65
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 12.03
OPS UNIFORMS460467683
Stn. 16
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 120.71
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 11.47
7Page:
Packet Page 87 of 930
07/16/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
8
12:58:02PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112945 7/16/2009 (Continued)066382 CINTAS CORPORATION
UNIFORMS460467684
Volunteers
001.000.510.522.410.240.00 21.16
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.410.240.00 2.01
Total :294.03
112946 7/16/2009 066070 CIT TECHNOLOGY FIN SERV INC 14733734 COPIER LEASE PW
copier lease for PW
001.000.650.519.910.450.00 573.21
Total :573.21
112947 7/16/2009 019215 CITY OF LYNNWOOD 7130 INV#7130, CUST#1430, EDMONDS PD
VERIZON PHONE 06/09 - NARCS
104.000.410.521.210.420.00 53.33
INV#7131, CUST #45 EDMONDS PD7131
NEXEL PHONES-NARCS 06/09
104.000.410.521.210.420.00 56.19
Total :109.52
112948 7/16/2009 035160 CITY OF SEATTLE 2-533584-460571 WATER USEAGE FOR THE MONTH OF June 09
WATER USEAGE FOR THE MONTH OF June 09
411.000.654.534.800.330.00 525.00
Total :525.00
112949 7/16/2009 004095 COASTWIDE LABS W2081196 005302
PAPER TOWELS/LAUNDRY SOAP/TISSUE
411.000.656.538.800.310.23 268.80
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.23 25.54
Total :294.34
112950 7/16/2009 004095 COASTWIDE LABS w2080743 Recycle - Liners
8Page:
Packet Page 88 of 930
07/16/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
9
12:58:02PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112950 7/16/2009 (Continued)004095 COASTWIDE LABS
Recycle - Liners
411.000.654.537.900.490.00 51.12
Fac Maint - Towels, Filters, TT, Hand
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 514.76
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.654.537.900.490.00 4.86
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 48.90
Total :619.64
112951 7/16/2009 064369 CODE PUBLISHING CO 33217 CODE UPDATES
ECC & ECDC Supplements
001.000.250.514.300.410.00 1,474.70
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.250.514.300.410.00 140.10
Total :1,614.80
112952 7/16/2009 071308 COLELLA, TERESA COLELLA0630 SOFTBALL FIELD ATTENDANT
SOFTBALL FIELD ATTENDANT @ MEADOWDALE
001.000.640.575.520.410.00 192.00
Total :192.00
112953 7/16/2009 072036 COLLINS, JENNIFER 7/8/09 Refund for AFLAC premium overpayment
Refund for AFLAC premium overpayment
001.000.620.532.200.110.00 12.65
Total :12.65
112954 7/16/2009 062891 COOK PAGING WA 7571267 pagers-water - 1pager 7/1-9/30/09
pagers-water - 1pager 7/1-9/30/09
411.000.654.534.800.420.00 11.86
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.420.00 0.61
Total :12.47
112955 7/16/2009 065683 CORRY'S FINE DRY CLEANING JUNE 2009 DRYCLEANING/LAUNDRY 06/09 EDMONDS PD
9Page:
Packet Page 89 of 930
07/16/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
10
12:58:02PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112955 7/16/2009 (Continued)065683 CORRY'S FINE DRY CLEANING
DRY CLEANING FOR JUNE 2009
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 822.16
Total :822.16
112956 7/16/2009 065683 CORRY'S FINE DRY CLEANING 510-0128 OPS UNIFORMS
Training Chief
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 26.02
PREVENTN UNIFORMS510-1524
Fire Marshal
001.000.510.522.300.240.00 19.17
OPS UNIFORMS510-1539
Batt Chiefs
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 63.57
ADMIN UNIFORMS510-1884
Fire Chief
001.000.510.522.100.240.00 9.59
OPS UNIFORMS510-2341
Asst Chief
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 38.33
Total :156.68
112957 7/16/2009 072189 DATASITE 62775 SHREDDING SERVICES
Shred Service City Clerk
001.000.250.514.300.410.00 20.00
Shred Service Admin. Services
001.000.310.514.230.410.00 20.00
Total :40.00
112958 7/16/2009 006626 DEPT OF ECOLOGY MS10002001 LAB ACCREDITATION
LAB ACCREDITATION
411.000.656.538.800.510.00 220.00
Total :220.00
112959 7/16/2009 006626 DEPT OF ECOLOGY 2010-WAR045513 2009 STORMWATER - MUNICIPAL STORMWATER
10Page:
Packet Page 90 of 930
07/16/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
11
12:58:02PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112959 7/16/2009 (Continued)006626 DEPT OF ECOLOGY
2009 STORMWATER - MUNICIPAL STORMWATER
411.000.652.542.900.510.00 10,720.50
Total :10,720.50
112960 7/16/2009 047450 DEPT OF INFORMATION SERVICES 2009060141 CUSTOMER ID# D200-0
Scan Services for June-09
001.000.310.518.880.420.00 310.13
Technology Brokering Services for Scan
001.000.310.518.880.420.00 139.08
Total :449.21
112961 7/16/2009 068734 DEPT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIES 6/25/09 Overpayment of timeloss for Jodi
Overpayment of timeloss for Jodi
001.000.410.521.220.110.00 102.37
Total :102.37
112962 7/16/2009 072646 DIACON TECHNOLOGIES INC 1866 POLYMER
POLYMER
411.000.656.538.800.310.51 2,145.00
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.51 203.78
Total :2,348.78
112963 7/16/2009 064531 DINES, JEANNIE 09-3005 INV#09-3005 EDMONDS PD
TRANSCRIPTION CASE 09-1539
001.000.410.521.210.410.00 87.00
TRANSCRIPTION CASE 09-1939
001.000.410.521.210.410.00 33.00
Total :120.00
112964 7/16/2009 064531 DINES, JEANNIE 09-3009 MINUTE TAKING
07/07 Council
001.000.250.514.300.410.00 222.00
Total :222.00
112965 7/16/2009 070790 DISTINCTIVE GLASS INC 15853 City Hall - Glass 44 1/2" x 46"
11Page:
Packet Page 91 of 930
07/16/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
12
12:58:02PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112965 7/16/2009 (Continued)070790 DISTINCTIVE GLASS INC
City Hall - Glass 44 1/2" x 46"
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 310.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 29.45
Total :339.45
112966 7/16/2009 070683 EDMONDS MAIL & PARCEL 16903 UPS/SAFETY HEALTH VIDEO
UPS/SAFETY HEALTH VIDEO
411.000.656.538.800.420.00 9.43
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.420.00 0.89
Total :10.32
112967 7/16/2009 065065 EDMONDS ROTARY DAYBREAKERS DAYBREAKERS0713 TOURISM PROMOTION AGREEMENT
TOURISM PROMOTION AGREEMENT
123.000.640.573.100.410.00 1,000.00
Total :1,000.00
112968 7/16/2009 008812 ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINES 046494 Canon 5870 copier - copy and
Canon 5870 copier - copy and
001.000.610.519.700.480.00 41.80
Canon 5870 copier - copy and
001.000.220.516.100.480.00 41.79
Canon 5870 copier - copy and
001.000.210.513.100.480.00 41.79
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.610.519.700.480.00 3.97
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.220.516.100.480.00 3.97
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.210.513.100.480.00 3.97
Total :137.29
112969 7/16/2009 009410 EVERETT STEEL COMPANIES 423735 SUPPLIES
12Page:
Packet Page 92 of 930
07/16/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
13
12:58:02PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112969 7/16/2009 (Continued)009410 EVERETT STEEL COMPANIES
PLATES
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 218.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 20.71
Total :238.71
112970 7/16/2009 072493 FIRSTLINE COMMUNICATIONS INC 6290925 Run cable for Channel 21 server and to
Run cable for Channel 21 server and to
001.000.230.512.500.480.00 221.03
Run cable for Channel 21 server and to
001.000.310.518.880.480.00 281.32
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.230.512.500.480.00 21.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.310.518.880.480.00 26.72
Total :550.07
112971 7/16/2009 018495 GLACIER NW/CALPORTLAND CO 90771382 Concrete
Concrete
111.000.653.542.610.310.00 386.75
9.5% Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.610.310.00 36.75
Concrete90776593
9.5% Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.610.310.00 35.69
Concrete
111.000.653.542.610.310.00 375.62
Total :834.81
112972 7/16/2009 072515 GOOGLE INC 775654 CUSTOMER # 101423
Jul-09 Internet Anti-Virus & Spam Maint
001.000.310.518.880.480.00 554.73
Total :554.73
112973 7/16/2009 012900 HARRIS FORD INC 98072 Unit 336 - Trans Fluid
13Page:
Packet Page 93 of 930
07/16/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
14
12:58:02PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112973 7/16/2009 (Continued)012900 HARRIS FORD INC
Unit 336 - Trans Fluid
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 25.86
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 2.46
uNIT 485 - Seat belt assembly98074
uNIT 485 - Seat belt assembly
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 110.76
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 10.52
Unit 486 - Cap98175
Unit 486 - Cap
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 6.66
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 0.63
Unit 332 - Hinge Plate98246
Unit 332 - Hinge Plate
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 3.42
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 0.32
Unit eq56po - Rivet98621
Unit eq56po - Rivet
511.100.657.594.480.640.00 7.20
9.5% Sales Tax
511.100.657.594.480.640.00 0.68
Unit eq56po - Swit Housing98622
Unit eq56po - Swit Housing
511.100.657.594.480.640.00 22.06
9.5% Sales Tax
511.100.657.594.480.640.00 2.10
14Page:
Packet Page 94 of 930
07/16/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
15
12:58:02PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112973 7/16/2009 (Continued)012900 HARRIS FORD INC
Unit 484 - Alternator Assembly98821
Unit 484 - Alternator Assembly
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 178.42
Core Charge
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 60.00
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 22.65
Unit 135 - Hose Assembly98840
Unit 135 - Hose Assembly
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 72.52
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 6.89
Unit 484 - Core fee returnedCM98821
Unit 484 - Core fee returned
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 -60.00
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 -5.70
Total :467.45
112974 7/16/2009 067099 HOLLEMAN, JOHN 53 LEOFF 1 Reimbursement
LEOFF 1 Reimbursement
009.000.390.517.370.230.00 215.00
Total :215.00
112975 7/16/2009 072829 HOLTER, JULIE HOLTER0713 REFUND
POINT OF SALE REFUND
001.000.000.239.200.000.00 98.00
Total :98.00
112976 7/16/2009 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 1047320 City Park - Stakes
15Page:
Packet Page 95 of 930
07/16/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
16
12:58:02PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112976 7/16/2009 (Continued)067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES
City Park - Stakes
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 31.29
Museum - Supplies
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 9.88
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 3.91
Street - Paint Truck - Supplies2030777
Street - Paint Truck - Supplies
111.000.653.542.640.310.00 11.52
9.5% Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.640.310.00 1.09
FAC & Fac Maint Unit 5 - Paint Supplies2035477
FAC & Fac Maint Unit 5 - Paint Supplies
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 103.69
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 9.85
Water - PVC Solvent, T Plus2 Suppleis2090785
Water - PVC Solvent, T Plus2 Suppleis
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 28.80
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 2.74
Street - Sawzall Blades2562457
Street - Sawzall Blades
111.000.653.542.640.310.00 37.94
9.5% Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.640.310.00 3.60
Sewer - Nozzles31269
Sewer - Nozzles
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 23.76
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 2.26
16Page:
Packet Page 96 of 930
07/16/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
17
12:58:02PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112976 7/16/2009 (Continued)067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES
FAC - Supplies47642
FAC - Supplies
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 23.58
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 2.24
Water - Fitings, Endcapps560936
Water - Fitings, Endcapps
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 31.07
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 2.95
Storm - Shop Vac supplies6037266
Storm - Shop Vac supplies
411.000.652.542.400.310.00 25.90
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.652.542.400.310.00 2.46
Water - Supplies6037345
Water - Supplies
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 33.82
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 3.21
FAC - MDF Bases6048311
FAC - MDF Bases
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 47.28
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 4.49
PS - Supplies7040071
PS - Supplies
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 22.56
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 2.14
PS - Paint Supplies7046193
PS - Paint Supplies
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 22.84
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 2.17
17Page:
Packet Page 97 of 930
07/16/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
18
12:58:02PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112976 7/16/2009 (Continued)067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES
City Park Bldg - Plastic Bags, Grantie83908
City Park Bldg - Plastic Bags, Grantie
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 6.38
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 0.61
Library - Drain repair supplies9036487
Library - Drain repair supplies
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 9.21
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 0.87
Street - Paint Truck - Supplies9039149
Street - Paint Truck - Supplies
111.000.653.542.640.310.00 23.08
9.5% Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.640.310.00 2.19
Plaza - Supplies9096608
Plaza - Supplies
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 4.98
Library - Plumbing supplies
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 61.43
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 6.31
Sewer LS6 - Supplies9570225
Sewer LS6 - Supplies
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 25.44
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 2.42
Parks Dept - Svc FeeFCH-003315424
Parks Dept - Svc Fee
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 20.00
Total :659.96
112977 7/16/2009 070042 IKON FINANCIAL SERVICES 79833584 COPIER LEASE
Cannon Image Runner 5/26-6/22
001.000.250.514.300.450.00 966.86
18Page:
Packet Page 98 of 930
07/16/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
19
12:58:02PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :966.861129777/16/2009 070042 070042 IKON FINANCIAL SERVICES
112978 7/16/2009 006841 IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS 5011798925 INV#5011798925 - EDMONDS PD
Scanner Maint Agreement 7/2009-6/2010
001.000.410.521.110.410.00 921.10
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.110.480.00 87.50
Total :1,008.60
112979 7/16/2009 067512 JACO ENVIRONMENTAL INC 17530 REFRIGERATOR PICK UP
REFRIGERATOR PICK UP
411.000.656.538.800.310.23 25.00
Total :25.00
112980 7/16/2009 015490 K & K CONCRETE PRODUCTS 32912 Storm - 4x8's
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.652.542.400.310.00 3.04
Storm - 4x8's
411.000.652.542.400.310.00 32.00
Total :35.04
112981 7/16/2009 070902 KAREN ULVESTAD PHOTOGRAPHY ULVESTAD11093 DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHY CLASS
DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHY~
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 175.50
Total :175.50
112982 7/16/2009 068401 KING CO OFFICE OF FINANCE WRIA8-4039 INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT WATERSHED PLANNING
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT WATERSHED PLANNING
411.000.652.542.900.510.00 4,315.33
Total :4,315.33
112983 7/16/2009 067877 KINGSTON LUMBER 292282 Wood Supplies
19Page:
Packet Page 99 of 930
07/16/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
20
12:58:02PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112983 7/16/2009 (Continued)067877 KINGSTON LUMBER
Wood Supplies
111.000.653.542.610.310.00 295.12
Wood Supplies
111.000.653.542.640.310.00 1,187.42
9.5% Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.610.310.00 28.04
9.5% Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.640.310.00 112.80
Total :1,623.38
112984 7/16/2009 072304 KOTIS DESIGN 68121 PARK MAINTENANCE T-SHIRTS
T-SHIRTS FOR PARK MAINTENANCE EMPLOYEES
001.000.640.576.800.240.00 440.34
Freight
001.000.640.576.800.240.00 13.96
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.240.00 43.17
Total :497.47
112985 7/16/2009 017050 KWICK'N KLEEN CAR WASH 07082009-01 INV#07082009-01 EDMONDS PD
68 CAR WASHES @ $5.03 - 06/09
001.000.410.521.220.480.00 342.04
Total :342.04
112986 7/16/2009 018950 LYNNWOOD AUTO PARTS INC 579607 Unit 80 - Oil Filter, Batt Cable
Unit 80 - Oil Filter, Batt Cable
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 15.48
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 1.47
Unit 98 - Oil Filter579740
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 1.80
Unit 98 - Oil Filter
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 18.91
20Page:
Packet Page 100 of 930
07/16/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
21
12:58:02PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112986 7/16/2009 (Continued)018950 LYNNWOOD AUTO PARTS INC
Unit 487 - Relay579965
Unit 487 - Relay
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 30.56
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 2.90
Unit 484 - Heater Valve579971
Unit 484 - Heater Valve
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 53.49
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 5.08
Unit 138 - Sending unit580030
Unit 138 - Sending unit
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 17.55
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 1.67
Unit 372 - Oil Filter580152
Unit 372 - Oil Filter
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 5.34
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 0.51
Unit 55 - Connectors580769
Unit 55 - Connectors
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 4.99
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 0.47
Unit 5 - Wiper Delay581141
Unit 5 - Wiper Delay
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 20.00
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 1.90
Total :182.12
112987 7/16/2009 019583 MANPOWER INC 19029469 7/1&2 Vacation coverage for Linda.
7/1&2 Vacation coverage for Linda.
001.000.620.558.800.410.00 162.30
21Page:
Packet Page 101 of 930
07/16/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
22
12:58:02PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :162.301129877/16/2009 019583 019583 MANPOWER INC
112988 7/16/2009 019920 MCCANN, MARIAN 52 LEOFF 1 Reimbursement
LEOFF 1 Reimbursement
009.000.390.517.370.290.00 6,473.25
Total :6,473.25
112989 7/16/2009 020039 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO 31897900 123106800
CHANNEL CONNECTING PLATES
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 229.05
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 21.43
12310680031950203
HOSE/GROOVE X PLUG
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 77.94
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 7.00
12310680031971727
CHANNEL/SPRAY NOZZLE/PIPE
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 1,401.71
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 117.88
12310680032107721
PIPE FITTING
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 57.12
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 6.70
12310680032232328
STRUT MOUNT CLAMPS
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 140.50
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 8.55
Total :2,067.88
112990 7/16/2009 020900 MILLERS EQUIP & RENT ALL INC 91738 17967
22Page:
Packet Page 102 of 930
07/16/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
23
12:58:02PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112990 7/16/2009 (Continued)020900 MILLERS EQUIP & RENT ALL INC
SCAFFOLD PLANK
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 165.00
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 15.67
Total :180.67
112991 7/16/2009 020900 MILLERS EQUIP & RENT ALL INC 90796 Street Mower Rental Fees
Street Mower Rental Fees
111.000.653.542.710.450.00 66.00
9.5% Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.710.450.00 6.27
Total :72.27
112992 7/16/2009 020900 MILLERS EQUIP & RENT ALL INC 92038 OPS EXPENDABLE TOOLS
sharpen chain saws
001.000.510.522.200.359.00 90.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.200.359.00 8.55
Total :98.55
112993 7/16/2009 067005 MINE SAFETY APPLIANCES 94305385 239570
ELECTRONIC PC CARD
411.000.656.538.800.310.22 1,130.00
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.22 108.25
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.22 9.48
Total :1,247.73
112994 7/16/2009 064570 NATIONAL SAFETY INC 0252443-IN Water/Sewer - Gloves, Supplies
23Page:
Packet Page 103 of 930
07/16/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
24
12:58:02PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112994 7/16/2009 (Continued)064570 NATIONAL SAFETY INC
Water/Sewer - Gloves, Supplies
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 189.50
Water/Sewer - Gloves, Supplies
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 189.50
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 18.01
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 18.00
Water/Sewer - Hvy Dty Gloves0252800-IN
Water/Sewer - Hvy Dty Gloves
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 79.50
Water/Sewer - Hvy Dty Gloves
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 79.50
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 7.56
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 7.55
Water/Sewer - Hvy Dty Gloves MD0253246-IN
Water/Sewer - Hvy Dty Gloves MD
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 39.75
Water/Sewer - Hvy Dty Gloves MD
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 39.75
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 3.78
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 3.78
Total :676.18
112995 7/16/2009 024302 NELSON PETROLEUM 0406592-IN Filter Inventory
Filter Inventory
511.000.657.548.680.340.40 45.07
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.340.40 4.28
Total :49.35
24Page:
Packet Page 104 of 930
07/16/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
25
12:58:02PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112996 7/16/2009 024910 NORMED 24808-569444 INV#24808-569444 EDMONDS PD
CETAFEN EXTRA, 500MG, 50/2'S
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 3.72
CETAFEN, NON-ASPRIN, 50/2'S
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 5.38
NUTRALOX, MINT, ANTACID, 50/2'S
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 5.44
PROPRINAL, 200MG, 50/2'S
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 10.98
RELIEF-SF, COLD CAPLETS, 50/2'S
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 12.92
ASPIRIN PAIN RELIEVER, 50/2'S
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 4.52
ADHV. BANDAGES, 1X3, 50/BX
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 4.50
ADHV BANDAGES, SHEER, 1X3, 100/BX
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 4.74
Freight
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 9.70
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 5.88
Total :67.78
112997 7/16/2009 025217 NORTH SOUND HOSE & FITTINGS 30312 CITYEDMTRE
FIRE HOSE/ADAPTER/ASSEMBLIES
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 465.72
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 42.85
Total :508.57
112998 7/16/2009 068451 NORTHEND TRUCK EQUIPMENT INC 1022310 Unit eq51so - New Dump Truck to replace
Unit eq51so - New Dump Truck to replace
511.100.657.594.480.640.00 51,041.00
9.5% Sales Tax
511.100.657.594.480.640.00 4,848.90
25Page:
Packet Page 105 of 930
07/16/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
26
12:58:02PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
112998 7/16/2009 (Continued)068451 NORTHEND TRUCK EQUIPMENT INC
Unit eq51so - Hazard locks and plow1022347
Unit eq51so - Hazard locks and plow
511.100.657.594.480.640.00 933.00
Sales Tax
511.100.657.594.480.640.00 80.24
Total :56,903.14
112999 7/16/2009 061013 NORTHWEST CASCADE INC 0969055 HONEY BUCKET RENTAL
HONEY BUCKET RENTAL:~
001.000.640.576.800.450.00 180.29
HONEY BUCKET RENTAL0971327
HONEY BUCKET RENTAL:~
001.000.640.576.800.450.00 180.29
HONEY BUCKET RENTAL0971328
HONEY BUCKET RENTAL:~
001.000.640.576.800.450.00 180.29
HONEY BUCKET RENTAL0974403
HONEY BUCKET RENTAL:~
001.000.640.576.800.450.00 758.96
Total :1,299.83
113000 7/16/2009 072825 NORTHWEST SOCCER CAMP NWSOCCER0708 REFUND
REFUND FOR CANCELLED RENTAL
001.000.000.239.200.000.00 135.00
Total :135.00
113001 7/16/2009 025690 NOYES, KARIN 09-3006 Jan-Jun 09 So Sno Cities Mtg Minutes
Jan-Jun 09 So Sno Cities Mtg Minutes
001.000.000.237.910.000.00 579.00
Total :579.00
113002 7/16/2009 063511 OFFICE MAX INC 367636 INV#367636, ACCT#520437 250POL
26Page:
Packet Page 106 of 930
07/16/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
27
12:58:02PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
113002 7/16/2009 (Continued)063511 OFFICE MAX INC
HANGING LETTER FILES
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 15.38
STAPLER, HEAVY DUTY
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 9.11
STAPLES, HEAVY DUTY
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 13.20
TAPE DISPENSER
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 2.63
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 3.83
INV#372395, ACCT#520437 250POL372395
HP TONER LASER JET CARTRIDGE
001.000.410.521.210.310.00 178.06
COPIER LABELS, 2X4 1/4
001.000.410.521.910.310.00 118.24
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.210.310.00 16.92
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.910.310.00 11.23
INV#380754 ACCT#520437 250POL380754
DYMO FOLDER LABELS
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 30.09
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 2.86
27Page:
Packet Page 107 of 930
07/16/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
28
12:58:02PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
113002 7/16/2009 (Continued)063511 OFFICE MAX INC
INV#434683 ACCT#520437 250POL434683
KLEENEX FACIAL TISSUE
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 72.56
HP LASER JET TONER CART Q2613A
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 78.54
HAND SANITIZER, 8OZ PUMP
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 27.48
STAPLE REMOVERS
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 0.36
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 17.00
Total :597.49
113003 7/16/2009 063511 OFFICE MAX INC 053959 Cord clips
Cord clips
001.000.310.518.880.310.00 19.90
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.310.518.880.310.00 1.89
Total :21.79
113004 7/16/2009 063511 OFFICE MAX INC 384437 OFFICE SUPPLIES
Office Supplies
001.000.250.514.300.310.00 145.72
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.250.514.300.310.00 13.84
Total :159.56
113005 7/16/2009 025889 OGDEN MURPHY AND WALLACE 675796 MAY-09 LITIGATION LEGAL SERVICES
May-09 Litigation legal services
001.000.360.515.100.410.00 10,466.23
MAY-09675961
May-09 Basic Legal Services
001.000.360.515.100.410.00 14,285.60
May-09 ECDC Rewrite 2006-2007 Legal
001.000.620.558.600.410.00 2,839.00
28Page:
Packet Page 108 of 930
07/16/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
29
12:58:02PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :27,590.831130057/16/2009 025889 025889 OGDEN MURPHY AND WALLACE
113006 7/16/2009 025889 OGDEN MURPHY AND WALLACE 675961 Prof Serv Legislative Legal Fees -
Prof Serv Legislative Legal Fees -
001.000.110.511.100.410.00 6,436.20
Total :6,436.20
113007 7/16/2009 063750 ORCA PACIFIC INC 039404 YOST POOL SUPPLIES
YOST POOL SUPPLIES
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 398.30
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 37.83
YOST POOL SUPPLIES039563
YOST POOL SUPPLIES
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 325.35
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 30.91
YOST POOL SUPPLIES039683
YOST POOL SUPPLIES
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 770.40
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 73.19
YOST POOL SUPPLIES039812
YOST POOL SUPPLIES
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 325.35
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 30.91
Total :1,992.24
113008 7/16/2009 066339 PACIFIC OFFICE AUTOMATION 846225 B/W copy overage fee~
29Page:
Packet Page 109 of 930
07/16/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
30
12:58:02PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
113008 7/16/2009 (Continued)066339 PACIFIC OFFICE AUTOMATION
B/W copy overage fee~
411.000.654.534.800.480.00 0.55
B/W copy overage fee~
411.000.655.535.800.480.00 0.55
B/W copy overage fee~
411.000.652.542.900.480.00 0.55
B/W copy overage fee~
111.000.653.542.900.480.00 0.56
Color copy overage fee~
411.000.654.534.800.480.00 20.52
Color copy overage fee~
411.000.655.535.800.480.00 20.52
Color copy overage fee~
411.000.652.542.900.480.00 20.52
Color copy overage fee~
111.000.653.542.900.480.00 20.50
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.480.00 2.00
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.480.00 2.00
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.652.542.900.480.00 2.00
9.5% Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.900.480.00 2.01
Total :92.28
113009 7/16/2009 027060 PACIFIC TOPSOILS 86980 Storm - Dumping Fees
Storm - Dumping Fees
411.000.652.542.320.490.00 315.00
Storm - Dumping Fees86990
Storm - Dumping Fees
411.000.652.542.320.490.00 315.00
Total :630.00
113010 7/16/2009 027165 PARKER PAINT MFG. CO.INC.847213 FAC - Paint
30Page:
Packet Page 110 of 930
07/16/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
31
12:58:02PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
113010 7/16/2009 (Continued)027165 PARKER PAINT MFG. CO.INC.
FAC - Paint
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 14.95
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 1.42
FAC - Paint Supplies848211
FAC - Paint Supplies
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 30.32
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 2.88
Total :49.57
113011 7/16/2009 066412 PARKS & RECREATION DAYCAMP CAMPCASH0714 DAYCAMP PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
DAYCAMP SUPPLIES
001.000.640.575.530.310.00 170.72
DAYCAMP TRANSPORTATION
001.000.640.575.530.430.00 65.00
DAYCAMP PHOTO PRINTING & ENTRANCE FEES
001.000.640.575.530.490.00 151.84
Total :387.56
113012 7/16/2009 029117 PORT OF EDMONDS 0003870 CITY OF EDMONDS STORMWATER
Stormwater Rent & Leasehold tax
411.000.652.542.900.450.00 1,665.96
Total :1,665.96
113013 7/16/2009 064088 PROTECTION ONE 31146525 24 HOUR ALARM MONITORING -CITY HALL
24 hour alarm monitoring-CH~
001.000.651.519.920.420.00 36.75
Total :36.75
113014 7/16/2009 030400 PUGET SOUND CLEAN AIR AGENCY 09 060S Q3-09 CLEAN AIR ASSESSMENT SUPPORT
Q3-09 Clean Air Assessment per RCW
001.000.390.531.700.510.00 6,235.75
Total :6,235.75
113015 7/16/2009 065579 QUIKSIGN 57758 SINCLAIR/AP-09-1 SIGN INSTALLATION.
31Page:
Packet Page 111 of 930
07/16/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
32
12:58:02PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
113015 7/16/2009 (Continued)065579 QUIKSIGN
SINCLAIR/AP-09-1 SIGN INSTALLATION.
001.000.620.558.600.410.11 169.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.620.558.600.410.11 16.06
Total :185.06
113016 7/16/2009 030780 QUIRING MONUMENTS INC 100353 MARKER
MARKER: BELL
130.000.640.536.200.340.00 215.00
INSCRIPTION100354
INSCRIPTION: MOEN
130.000.640.536.200.340.00 80.00
Total :295.00
113017 7/16/2009 064291 QWEST 206-Z02-0478 332B TELEMETRY
TELEMETRY
411.000.656.538.800.420.00 138.52
Total :138.52
113018 7/16/2009 071702 RAILROAD MGMT CO III LLC 251468 Meadowdale Storm Drain Crossing
Meadowdale Storm Drain Crossing
411.000.652.542.900.450.00 90.75
Meadowdale Storm Drain Crossing Rent251469
Meadowdale Storm Drain Crossing Rent
411.000.652.542.900.450.00 90.75
Edmonds Storm Drain Crossing Rent251506
Edmonds Storm Drain Crossing Rent
411.000.652.542.900.450.00 90.75
Total :272.25
113019 7/16/2009 072254 RIVER OAKS COMMUNICATIONS CORP 07142009 VERIZON/FRONTIER TRANSFER NEGOTIATIONS
Verizon/Frontier Franchise Transfer
001.000.390.519.900.410.00 940.59
Total :940.59
113020 7/16/2009 071467 S MORRIS COMPANY 06/29/09 ACCT#70014, ANIMAL CONTROL-EDMONDS PD
32Page:
Packet Page 112 of 930
07/16/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
33
12:58:02PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
113020 7/16/2009 (Continued)071467 S MORRIS COMPANY
#472282 3 NPC 6/8/09
001.000.410.521.700.410.00 32.04
#483290 1 NPC 6/15/09
001.000.410.521.700.410.00 10.68
Total :42.72
113021 7/16/2009 067802 SAN DIEGO POLICE EQUIP CO 589172 INV#589172 - CUST#0001733/EDMONDS PD
S&W M&P 9/40 CONV KIT SIM-5311100
001.000.410.521.400.490.00 1,847.76
9MM MARKING CTG BL SIM-5303700CF
001.000.410.521.400.490.00 515.00
Freight
001.000.410.521.400.490.00 22.09
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.400.490.00 226.57
Total :2,611.42
113022 7/16/2009 071159 SEATTLE SHAKESPEARE COMPANY WOODEN O 0719 PARK PERFORMANCE
PARK PERFORMANCE: TAMING OF THE SHREW~
117.100.640.573.100.410.00 1,700.00
Total :1,700.00
113023 7/16/2009 036955 SKY NURSERY 280238 Water Dept - Supplies - 3Way Soil
Water Dept - Supplies - 3Way Soil
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 229.70
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 21.82
Total :251.52
113024 7/16/2009 037303 SNO CO FIRE DIST # 1 2009 FD#1 Note 2009 PR & INT DEBT SERVICE PMT FIRE STN
2009 Prin Debt Service Pmt Fire Station
001.000.390.591.780.750.00 61,519.99
2009 Int Debt Service Pmt Fire Station
001.000.390.592.770.830.00 4,437.47
Total :65,957.46
33Page:
Packet Page 113 of 930
07/16/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
34
12:58:02PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
113025 7/16/2009 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 2340031869 MINI PARK RESTROOMS
MINI PARK RESTROOMS
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 207.16
BRACKETT'S LANDING BATH HOUSE3010022725
BRACKETT'S LANDING BATH HOUSE
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 71.21
UTILITY BILLING3110774142
23202 EDMONDS WAY
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 83.71
IRRIGATION SYSTEM5100017325
IRRIGATION SYSTEM
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 33.41
Total :395.49
113026 7/16/2009 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 937038503 620-001-500-3
VARIOUS LOCATIONS
411.000.656.538.800.471.62 7.01
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.471.62 0.42
463-001-705-3981057877
23219 74TH AVE W/BALLINGER
411.000.656.538.800.471.62 29.14
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.471.62 1.75
Total :38.32
113027 7/16/2009 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 2400010746 LIFT STATION #10
LIFT STATION #10
411.000.655.535.800.470.00 107.93
SIGNAL LIGHT3180012308
SIGNAL LIGHT
111.000.653.542.640.470.00 32.10
SCHOOL FLASHING LIGHT3380016430
SCHOOL FLASHING LIGHT
111.000.653.542.640.470.00 30.39
34Page:
Packet Page 114 of 930
07/16/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
35
12:58:02PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
113027 7/16/2009 (Continued)037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1
SCHOOL FLASHING LIGHT3970013581
SCHOOL FLASHING LIGHT
111.000.653.542.640.470.00 31.39
LIFT STATION #143980029445
LIFT STATION #14
411.000.655.535.800.470.00 30.89
STREET LIGHT5370016262
STREET LIGHT
111.000.653.542.630.470.00 30.89
STREET LIGHTING6000013000
STREET LIGHTING
111.000.653.542.630.470.00 9,643.54
STREET LIGHTING6100013009
STREET LIGHTING
111.000.653.542.630.470.00 7,928.69
STREET LIGHTING6100013306
STREET LIGHTING
111.000.653.542.630.470.00 184.24
STREET LIGHTING6200013008
STREET LIGHTING
111.000.653.542.630.470.00 596.97
Total :18,617.03
113028 7/16/2009 064351 SNOHOMISH COUNTY TREASURER 2009089 INV#2009089 EDMONDS PD
54 BOOKINGS FOR 6/09
001.000.410.523.600.510.00 5,009.04
443.50 HOUSING DAYS FOR 6/09
001.000.410.523.600.510.00 27,102.29
Total :32,111.33
113029 7/16/2009 038300 SOUND DISPOSAL CO 03584 RECYCLING
RECYCLING
411.000.656.538.800.475.66 28.25
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.475.66 1.70
35Page:
Packet Page 115 of 930
07/16/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
36
12:58:02PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :29.951130297/16/2009 038300 038300 SOUND DISPOSAL CO
113030 7/16/2009 070677 SPRINT 502779811-019 INV#502779811-019 EDMONDS PD
DATA CARDS 07/07 - 08/06/09
001.000.410.521.220.420.00 169.97
Total :169.97
113031 7/16/2009 046200 STATE OF WASHINGTON Q2-09 Q2-09 LEASEHOLD TAX LIABILITY
Q2-09 Leasehold Tax Liability
001.000.000.237.220.000.00 4,880.68
Total :4,880.68
113032 7/16/2009 009400 STELLAR INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY INC 2830625 Sewer - Earplugs
Sewer - Earplugs
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 34.29
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 3.26
Total :37.55
113033 7/16/2009 065941 SvR DESIGN CO 0007982 4TH AVE CULTURAL CORRIDOR
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR 4TH AVE
132.000.640.594.760.410.00 1,401.50
Total :1,401.50
113034 7/16/2009 040917 TACOMA SCREW PRODUCTS INC 10836986 SUPPLIES
RUSTOLEUM
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 125.00
Freight
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 6.85
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 12.53
Total :144.38
113035 7/16/2009 009350 THE DAILY HERALD COMPANY 101415 NEWSPAPER ADS
Council & Plan Bd Agendas
001.000.250.514.300.440.00 1,672.15
36Page:
Packet Page 116 of 930
07/16/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
37
12:58:02PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
113035 7/16/2009 (Continued)009350 THE DAILY HERALD COMPANY
NEWSPAPER ADS1654506
Concession Agreement
001.000.250.514.300.440.00 62.76
NEWSPAPER AD1654602
Ordinance 3740
001.000.250.514.300.440.00 34.88
NEWSPAPER ADS1654603
Ordinance 3739
001.000.250.514.300.440.00 34.88
NEWSPAPER AD1654604
Ordinance 3738
001.000.250.514.300.440.00 36.52
NEWSPAPER AD1654605
Ordinance 3737
001.000.250.514.300.440.00 36.52
NEWSPAPER AD1654798
Ordinance 3741
001.000.250.514.300.440.00 31.60
NEWSPAPER ADS1655057
Ordinance 3743
001.000.250.514.300.440.00 28.32
NEWSPAPER AD1655058
Ordinance 3742
001.000.250.514.300.440.00 29.96
NEWSPAPER AD1655504
Ordinance 3745
001.000.250.514.300.440.00 29.96
NEWSPAPER AD1655505
Ordinance 3744
001.000.250.514.300.440.00 28.32
Total :2,025.87
113036 7/16/2009 009350 THE DAILY HERALD COMPANY 1653467 Johannessen/S-08-35 Legal Notices.
Johannessen/S-08-35 Legal Notices.
001.000.620.558.600.440.00 20.94
37Page:
Packet Page 117 of 930
07/16/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
38
12:58:02PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
113036 7/16/2009 (Continued)009350 THE DAILY HERALD COMPANY
Dedonker/S-09-34 Legal Notices.1653653
Dedonker/S-09-34 Legal Notices.
001.000.620.558.600.440.00 93.46
Oasis/CU-09-37 Legal Notices.1653909
Oasis/CU-09-37 Legal Notices.
001.000.620.558.600.440.00 31.60
Oasis/R-09-36 Legal Notices1653910
Oasis/R-09-36 Legal Notices
001.000.620.558.600.440.00 20.94
Griffin/ADU-09-33 Legal Notices1654153
Griffin/ADU-09-33 Legal Notices
001.000.620.558.600.440.00 21.76
City/AMD-09-8 Legal Notices.1654693
City/AMD-09-8 Legal Notices.
001.000.620.558.600.440.00 26.68
Jansen/CU-09-38 Legal Notices.1655060
Jansen/CU-09-38 Legal Notices.
001.000.620.558.600.440.00 21.76
Total :237.14
113037 7/16/2009 027269 THE PART WORKS INC 261602 Fac Maint - Key Tee Handle
Fac Maint - Key Tee Handle
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 51.60
FAC - Supplies
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 33.51
Freight
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 7.82
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 8.84
Total :101.77
113038 7/16/2009 072830 THURMON, DOUG THURMON0713 REFUND
REFUND OF DAMAGE DEPOSIT
001.000.000.239.200.000.00 250.00
38Page:
Packet Page 118 of 930
07/16/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
39
12:58:02PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :250.001130387/16/2009 072830 072830 THURMON, DOUG
113039 7/16/2009 071590 TOWEILL RICE TAYLOR LLC June2009-Edmonds June Hearing Service including postage
June Hearing Service including postage
001.000.620.558.600.410.00 3,512.37
Total :3,512.37
113040 7/16/2009 041960 TOWN & COUNTRY FENCE INC 39980 162ND & 76TH PL FENCING PROJECT
MATERIAL & LABOR TO INSTALL FENCE @
125.000.640.594.750.480.00 14,957.50
9.5% Sales Tax
125.000.640.594.750.480.00 1,420.97
Total :16,378.47
113041 7/16/2009 042800 TRI-CITIES SECURITY 15906 City Hall - Key Blanks
City Hall - Key Blanks
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 13.50
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 1.28
Total :14.78
113042 7/16/2009 072146 TRUAX, BREANNE TRUAX0712 ANDERSON CENTER MONITOR
ROOM 206/ANDERSON CENTER~
001.000.640.574.100.410.00 60.00
Total :60.00
113043 7/16/2009 062693 US BANK 1070 INV#1070 - 07/06/09 - THOMPSON - EDMONDS
ALL PURPOSE TARPS/WEIGHTS
001.000.410.521.110.350.00 200.93
CAR COVERS FOR VEHICLE STORAGE
001.000.410.521.110.350.00 229.73
WOOD DOCUMENT FRAMES
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 17.56
MOUNT/ENGRAVING OFF/EMP YR
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 33.82
39Page:
Packet Page 119 of 930
07/16/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
40
12:58:02PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
113043 7/16/2009 (Continued)062693 US BANK
INV#3181 07/06/09 - BARD- EDMONDS PD3181
REG. DEFENSE TECH. - GREENMUM
001.000.410.521.400.490.00 895.00
REG. FBI/LEEDA - CAMERON
001.000.410.521.400.490.00 650.00
REG FBI/LEEDA - ROTH
001.000.410.521.400.490.00 325.00
INV#3314 07/06/09 - LAWLESS- EDMONDS PD3314
U BAR FOR RESPONSE VAN
001.000.410.521.210.310.00 13.10
INV#3512 07/06/09 - TRAINING- EDMONDS PD3512
CLEAR FILE BOXES
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 26.25
LUNCH ACCREDITATION FILE REVIEW
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 9.32
40Page:
Packet Page 120 of 930
07/16/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
41
12:58:02PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
113043 7/16/2009 (Continued)062693 US BANK
INV#3520 07/06/09 - TRAINING-EDMONDS PD3520
FUEL/NTOA TRAINING-LIM 06/08/09
001.000.410.521.400.430.00 34.00
MEAL/NTOA TRAINING-LIM 06/08/09
001.000.410.521.400.430.00 12.00
MEAL/NTOA TRAINING-LIM 06/08/09
001.000.410.521.400.430.00 15.00
MEAL/NTOA TRAINING-LIM 06/09/09
001.000.410.521.400.430.00 44.96
MEAL/NTOA TRAINING-LIM 06/08/09
001.000.410.521.400.430.00 17.00
MEAL/NTOA TRAINING-LIM 06/11/09
001.000.410.521.400.430.00 9.00
MEAKL/NTOA TRAINING-LIM 06/10/09
001.000.410.521.400.430.00 14.64
MEAL/NTOA TRAINING-LIM 06/11/09
001.000.410.521.400.430.00 12.77
MEAL/NTOA TRAINING-LIM 06/12/09
001.000.410.521.400.430.00 9.65
LODGING/NTOA TRAINING-LIM 06/07-06/12/09
001.000.410.521.400.430.00 393.55
MEAL/NTOA TRAINING-LIM 06/12/09
001.000.410.521.400.430.00 6.70
MEAL/NTOA TRAINING-LIM 06/11/09
001.000.410.521.400.430.00 25.98
MEAL/NTOA TRAINING-LIM 06/10/09
001.000.410.521.400.430.00 7.41
MEAL/NTOA TRAINING-LIM 06/10/09
001.000.410.521.400.430.00 16.18
WALL SIGN HOLDERS/MOUNT TABS
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 83.05
Total :3,102.60
113044 7/16/2009 062693 US BANK 0067-3264 Sno. County Mayor's mtg (G. Haakenson)
41Page:
Packet Page 121 of 930
07/16/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
42
12:58:02PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
113044 7/16/2009 (Continued)062693 US BANK
Sno. County Mayor's mtg (G. Haakenson)
001.000.210.513.100.490.00 20.00
Total :20.00
113045 7/16/2009 062693 US BANK 3298 WFOA Conf-D Sharp
WFOA Conf-D Sharp
001.000.310.514.230.490.00 300.00
Total :300.00
113046 7/16/2009 062693 US BANK 3470 Service Fee
Service Fee
001.000.310.514.230.490.00 14.65
Total :14.65
113047 7/16/2009 062693 US BANK 3306 REFRIDGERATOR
REFRIDGERATOR
411.000.656.538.800.310.23 970.17
TRAINING/CRACUT/VAUGHAN/NORDQUIST/VAN
411.000.656.538.800.490.71 795.00
DUST REMOVAL SYSTEM
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 858.99
Total :2,624.16
113048 7/16/2009 062693 US BANK 2592777 CREDIT CARD CHARGES
Recording Fees
001.000.250.514.300.490.00 86.00
Total :86.00
113049 7/16/2009 062693 US BANK 3355 Front Porch Feed - 4 - Sprinkler Cans
Front Porch Feed - 4 - Sprinkler Cans
111.000.653.542.310.310.00 134.62
42Page:
Packet Page 122 of 930
07/16/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
43
12:58:02PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
113049 7/16/2009 (Continued)062693 US BANK
Water - PNWS-AWWA 2009 Short School~3546
Water - PNWS-AWWA 2009 Short School~
411.000.654.534.800.490.00 215.00
USPS - Owen Equip - Fleet return postage
511.000.657.548.680.420.00 4.80
USPS - Motorola - Fleet return postage
511.000.657.548.680.420.00 51.20
Total :405.62
113050 7/16/2009 062693 US BANK 07/06/09 SEPA Maintenance HPA Mailing. Conni
SEPA Maintenance HPA Mailing. Conni
411.000.652.542.900.420.00 301.29
Total :301.29
113051 7/16/2009 062693 US BANK 3389 Refreshments for Council Meetings
Refreshments for Council Meetings
001.000.110.511.100.310.00 13.79
Total :13.79
113052 7/16/2009 062693 US BANK 3223 CORREIRA
laptop accessory
001.000.510.522.200.350.00 21.89
cell phone accessory
001.000.510.522.200.420.00 27.29
OPS SUPPLIES3504
stations' cleaning supplies
001.000.510.522.200.310.00 69.66
Total :118.84
113053 7/16/2009 044300 US POSTAL SERVICE 00227 POSTAGE FOR CITY METER
Postage for City Meter250-00227
001.000.250.514.300.420.00 8,000.00
Total :8,000.00
113054 7/16/2009 064214 USSSA WASHINGTON STATE 205 TEAM REGISTRATIONS
43Page:
Packet Page 123 of 930
07/16/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
44
12:58:02PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
113054 7/16/2009 (Continued)064214 USSSA WASHINGTON STATE
MEN'S & MIXED TEAM REGISTRATION
001.000.640.575.520.410.00 875.00
Total :875.00
113055 7/16/2009 044960 UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOC CTR 9060108 utility locates
utility locates
411.000.654.534.800.410.00 89.19
utility locates
411.000.655.535.800.410.00 89.19
utility locates
411.000.652.542.900.410.00 89.22
Total :267.60
113056 7/16/2009 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST 425-745-5055 MEADOWDALE PRESCHOOL
MEADOWDALE PRESCHOOL
001.000.640.575.560.420.00 56.88
Total :56.88
113057 7/16/2009 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST 425-AB8-2844 POLICE T1 LINE
Police T1 Line 6/10-7/10/09
001.000.310.518.880.420.00 382.90
Total :382.90
113058 7/16/2009 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST 425-640-8169 PT EDWARDS SEWER PUMP STATION MONITOR
Phone line for Sewer Lift Station at Pt
411.000.655.535.800.420.00 36.07
LIBRARY ELEVATOR PHONE425-776-1281
LIBRARY ELEVATOR PHONE
001.000.651.519.920.420.00 44.89
CITY HALL FIRE ALARM SYSTEM425-776-6829
CITY HALL FIRE ALARM SYSTEM
001.000.651.519.920.420.00 117.15
1ST & PINE CIRCUIT LINE PT EDWARDS425-AB9-0530
1st & Pine Circuit Line for Pt Edwards
411.000.655.535.800.420.00 40.75
44Page:
Packet Page 124 of 930
07/16/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
45
12:58:02PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :238.861130587/16/2009 011900 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST
113059 7/16/2009 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS 0774139444 C/A 571242650-0001
45Page:
Packet Page 125 of 930
07/16/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
46
12:58:02PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
113059 7/16/2009 (Continued)067865 VERIZON WIRELESS
5/23-6/22/09 Blackberry Cell Phone
001.000.620.524.100.420.00 56.35
5/23-6/22/09 Blackberry Cell Phone
001.000.250.514.300.420.00 57.51
5/23-6/22/09 Blackberry Cell Phone
001.000.230.512.500.420.00 113.66
5/23-6/22/09 Blackberry Cell Phone
001.000.620.558.800.420.00 56.35
5/23-6/22/09 Blackberry Cell Phone
001.000.620.558.600.420.00 56.35
5/23-6/22/09 Blackberry Cell Phone
001.000.610.519.700.420.00 56.35
5/23-6/22/09 Blackberry Cell Phone
001.000.620.532.200.420.00 199.30
5/23-6/22/09 Blackberry Cell Phone
001.000.651.519.920.420.00 121.68
5/23-6/22/09 Blackberry Cell Phone
001.000.310.514.230.420.00 56.35
5/23-6/22/09 Blackberry Cell Phone
001.000.510.522.100.420.00 56.35
5/23-6/22/09 Blackberry Cell Phone
001.000.510.522.200.420.00 285.58
5/23-6/22/09 Blackberry Cell Phone
001.000.510.522.300.420.00 56.35
5/23-6/22/09 Blackberry Cell Phone
001.000.510.522.200.420.00 110.04
5/23-6/22/09 Blackberry Cell Phone
001.000.220.516.100.420.00 56.35
5/23-6/22/09 Blackberry Cell Phone
001.000.310.518.880.420.00 1,369.65
5/23-6/22/09 Blackberry Cell Phone
001.000.210.513.100.420.00 124.29
5/23-6/22/09 Blackberry Cell Phone
001.000.640.574.100.420.00 56.35
46Page:
Packet Page 126 of 930
07/16/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
47
12:58:02PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
113059 7/16/2009 (Continued)067865 VERIZON WIRELESS
5/23-6/22/09 Blackberry Cell Phone
001.000.410.521.220.420.00 1,134.88
5/23-6/22/09 Blackberry Air Cards
001.000.410.521.220.420.00 185.41
5/23-6/22/09 Blackberry Cell Phone
001.000.650.519.910.420.00 58.13
5/23-6/22/09 Blackberry Cell Phone
411.000.652.542.900.420.00 61.86
5/23-6/22/09 Blackberry Cell Phone
511.000.657.548.680.420.00 56.39
5/23-6/22/09 Blackberry Cell Phone
411.000.654.534.800.420.00 28.76
5/23-6/22/09 Blackberry Cell Phone
411.000.655.535.800.420.00 28.75
5/23-6/22/09 Blackberry Cell Phone
411.000.656.538.800.420.00 117.33
5/23-6/22/09 Blackberry Cell Phone
001.000.310.518.880.420.00 55.02
Total :4,615.39
113060 7/16/2009 065035 WASHINGTON STATE PATROL I09009954 INV#I09009954 EDM301
BACKGROUND CHECKS 06/09
001.000.000.237.100.000.00 192.50
Total :192.50
113061 7/16/2009 067195 WASHINGTON TREE EXPERTS 06-7547 Maple Stump and Alder Tree Down at
Maple Stump and Alder Tree Down at
111.000.653.542.710.410.00 550.00
Alder, Cherry Removal, 4 Alders Limb up06-7563
Alder, Cherry Removal, 4 Alders Limb up
111.000.653.542.710.410.00 425.00
Total :975.00
113062 7/16/2009 049500 WEST PUBLISHING 818687585 CODE UPDATES
47Page:
Packet Page 127 of 930
07/16/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
48
12:58:02PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
113062 7/16/2009 (Continued)049500 WEST PUBLISHING
RCW Updates
001.000.250.514.300.310.00 427.50
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.250.514.300.310.00 40.59
Total :468.09
113063 7/16/2009 049208 WESTERN EQUIP DIST INC 600998 Unit 109 - Deck Roller, Roller Shaft,
Unit 109 - Deck Roller, Roller Shaft,
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 126.81
Freight
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 9.13
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 12.91
Total :148.85
113064 7/16/2009 072195 WESTERN GRAPHICS INC 8106 Unit eq54,56po - Installation of
Unit eq54,56po - Installation of
511.100.657.594.480.640.00 250.00
9.5% Sales Tax
511.100.657.594.480.640.00 23.75
Total :273.75
113065 7/16/2009 067295 WITMER, ROB TOUCANS0712 PARK CONCERT
PERFORMER @ CITY PARK CONCERT
117.100.640.573.100.410.00 750.00
Total :750.00
Bank total :522,011.21143 Vouchers for bank code :front
522,011.21Total vouchers :Vouchers in this report143
48Page:
Packet Page 128 of 930
07/16/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
49
12:58:02PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
49Page:
Packet Page 129 of 930
AM-2384 2.D.
Claim for Damages
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:07/21/2009
Submitted By:Linda Hynd, City Clerk's Office
Submitted For:Sandy Chase Time:Consent
Department:City Clerk's Office Type:Action
Review Committee:
Committee Action:
Information
Subject Title
Acknowledge receipt of a Claim for Damages from Jenny Jorgenson (amount undetermined).
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
It is recommended that the City Council acknowledge receipt of the Claim for Damages by minute
entry.
Previous Council Action
N/A
Narrative
Jenny Jorgenson
8207 204th Street SW
Edmonds, WA 98026
(Amount undetermined)
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: Jorgenson Claim for Damages
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 07/16/2009 11:17 AM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 07/16/2009 11:26 AM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 07/16/2009 11:28 AM APRV
Form Started By: Linda
Hynd
Started On: 07/07/2009 02:50
PM
Final Approval Date: 07/16/2009
Packet Page 130 of 930
Packet Page 131 of 930
Packet Page 132 of 930
AM-2387 2.E.
Sewer Lift Stations Rehabilitation Project Consultant Agreement
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:07/21/2009
Submitted By:Conni Curtis, Engineering
Submitted For:Robert English Time:Consent
Department:Engineering Type:Action
Review Committee:
Committee Action:
Information
Subject Title
Authorization for Mayor to sign a professional services agreement with CHS Engineers, LLC for
design services for the Sewer Lift Stations Rehabilitation Project.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Council authorize Mayor to sign a professional services agreement with CHS Engineers, LLC for
design services for the Sewer Lift Stations Rehabilitation Project.
Previous Council Action
On November 3, 2008, Council authorized Staff to advertise a Request for Qualifications (RFQ)
for design services for the Sewer Lift Stations Rehabilitation Project.
Narrative
The 2006 Sanitary Sewer Comprehensive Plan identified the need to refurbish and upgrade nine
existing sewer lift (pump) stations constructed in the 1960's and 1970's as part of the City’s 6-year
Capital Improvement Program. The existing mechanical and electrical equipment that operate
these stations are obsolete and need to be replaced to prevent pump failures, reduce the risk of
sewage overflows and reduce maintenance costs. The piping and ventilation will also be upgraded
to improve the operation of the lift stations.
The work to be performed by the consultant will consist of providing design services, with
emphasis on the following elements: 1) Electrical; 2) System Analysis and Sizing; 3) Mechanical;
4) Ventilation; and 5) Operations and Maintenance. This project is funded by the City's sewer
utility fund(Fund 412-300).
Statements of qualifications (SOQ) were received from nine engineering firms in response to the
RFQ. Based on a review of the SOQs and comparison to the selection criteria, two firms were
selected for interviews. Following the interviews, CHS Engineers, LLC was selected as the
preferred consultant based on their qualifications and experience.
The fee for the professional services agreement is $455,000. A copy of the professional services
agreement is attached.
Fiscal Impact
Packet Page 133 of 930
Attachments
Link: Professional Services Agreement
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 Engineering Conni Curtis 07/14/2009 08:30 AM APRV
2 Public Works Noel Miller 07/14/2009 08:40 AM APRV
3 City Clerk Sandy Chase 07/14/2009 09:00 AM APRV
4 Mayor Gary Haakenson 07/14/2009 09:04 AM APRV
5 Final Approval Sandy Chase 07/15/2009 09:43 AM APRV
Form Started By: Conni
Curtis
Started On: 07/09/2009 12:34
PM
Final Approval Date: 07/15/2009
Packet Page 134 of 930
Packet Page 135 of 930
Packet Page 136 of 930
Packet Page 137 of 930
Packet Page 138 of 930
Packet Page 139 of 930
Packet Page 140 of 930
Packet Page 141 of 930
Packet Page 142 of 930
Packet Page 143 of 930
Packet Page 144 of 930
AM-2402 2.F.
Authorization to Salvage Surplus Water & Wastewater Parts
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:07/21/2009
Submitted By:Carla Raymond, Public Works
Submitted For:Noel Miller Time:Consent
Department:Public Works Type:Action
Review Committee:
Committee Action:
Information
Subject Title
Requesting authorization to salvage surplus and obsolete parts for Water and Wastewater
Divisions.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Authorize the Public Works Department to auction or scrap surplus and obsolete parts.
Previous Council Action
On July 14, 2009 City Council Finance Committee approved the auction or scrap of surplus and
obsolete parts.
Narrative
Water and Wastewater Divisions are requesting authorization to sell the attached items as scrap or
auction parts that have no value or use to the City.
Fiscal Impact
Fiscal Year:2009
Revenue:0
Expenditure:0
Fiscal Impact:
Salvage value estimates at $1,000 for Water and $24,750 for Wastewater.
Attachments
Link: Water Salvage
Link: WWTP Salvage
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 07/16/2009 12:54 PM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 07/16/2009 12:57 PM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 07/16/2009 02:32 PM APRV
Form Started By: Carla
Raymond
Started On: 07/16/2009 09:57
AM
Packet Page 145 of 930
Final Approval Date: 07/16/2009
Packet Page 146 of 930
Packet Page 147 of 930
Packet Page 148 of 930
Packet Page 149 of 930
Packet Page 150 of 930
Packet Page 151 of 930
Packet Page 152 of 930
Packet Page 153 of 930
Packet Page 154 of 930
Packet Page 155 of 930
Packet Page 156 of 930
Packet Page 157 of 930
Packet Page 158 of 930
Packet Page 159 of 930
Packet Page 160 of 930
Packet Page 161 of 930
Packet Page 162 of 930
Packet Page 163 of 930
Packet Page 164 of 930
Packet Page 165 of 930
Packet Page 166 of 930
Packet Page 167 of 930
Packet Page 168 of 930
Packet Page 169 of 930
Packet Page 170 of 930
Packet Page 171 of 930
Packet Page 172 of 930
Packet Page 173 of 930
Packet Page 174 of 930
Packet Page 175 of 930
Packet Page 176 of 930
Packet Page 177 of 930
Packet Page 178 of 930
AM-2407 2.G.
Proposed Equipment Rental Hourly Rates
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:07/21/2009
Submitted By:Debra Sharp, Administrative Services Time:Consent
Department:Administrative Services Type:Action
Review Committee:Finance
Committee Action:Approved for Consent Agenda
Information
Subject Title
Proposed equipment rental hourly rates for external agencies. Proposed equipment rental hourly
rates for the Transportation Benefit District.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Approve attached rate schedule.
Previous Council Action
July Finance Committee
Narrative
Equipment Rental Hourly Rates need to be set for reimbursement by external agencies. There are
instances when the City is required to use their equipment for projects that will be reimbursed by
an outside agency. When the City is reimbursed by a governmental agency, for example grant
reimbursement, the City uses rates set by the Federal Emergency Management Agency. When a
private contractor is to reimburse the City, the rates are set at twice the amount of the FEMA rates.
Rates need to be set for reimbursement by the Transportation Benefit District. The rates charged
the TBD will be the same rates used for any governmental reimbursement.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: Proposed 2009 Equipment Rental Hourly Rates
Link: Proposed 2009 TBD Equipment Rental Hourly Rates
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 Admin Services Kathleen Junglov 07/16/2009 02:37 PM APRV
2 City Clerk Sandy Chase 07/16/2009 02:50 PM APRV
3 Mayor Gary Haakenson 07/16/2009 02:56 PM APRV
4 Final Approval Sandy Chase 07/16/2009 02:57 PM APRV
Form Started By: Debra
Sharp
Started On: 07/16/2009 02:15
PM
Final Approval Date: 07/16/2009
Packet Page 179 of 930
Packet Page 180 of 930
CITY OF EDMONDS
PROPOSED 2009 HOURLY RENTAL RATES
UNIT #DESCRIPTION Intergovernmental Contractor
Rates Rates
2 2005 Ford F-250 $22.00 $44.00
3 1995 Case Backhoe 1 1/2 c.y.$39.00 $78.00
5 1997 Chevrolet Step Van $19.00 $38.00
6 2008 Ford F250 $22.00 $44.00
7 2004 Chevrolet Pickup $22.00 $44.00
8 2002 Ford Tractor Mower $25.00 $50.00
9 2002 CAT Loader 2 c.y.$34.00 $68.00
10 2001 Dodge Flatbed $25.00 $50.00
11 2001 International Dump Truck $60.00 $120.00 (2)
Snow Plow additional $16.00 $32.00
12 1993 Dodge Pickup $22.00 $44.00
13 2008 Wacker - Asphalt Roller $70.00 $140.00
17 1994 International Dump Truck $60.00 $120.00 (2)
Snow Plow additional $16.00 $32.00
18 1995 Ford Tractor Loader $17.50 $35.00
19 1995 Ford Service Truck $22.00 $44.00
20 1995 Freightliner Dump Truck 8 c.y.$43.00 $86.00
21 1995 GMC Dump Truck 8 c.y.$43.00 $86.00
22 2000 International Dump Truck 8 c.y.$43.00 $86.00
Snow Plow additional $16.00 $32.00
23 2008 Ford F-450 Utility $30.00 $60.00
24 2008 Ford F-450 Utility $30.00 $60.00
25 2006 Ford F-450 Utility $30.00 $60.00
28 2004 Chevrolet Pickup $22.00 $44.00
29 2004 Chevrolet Colorado $19.00 $38.00
30 1999 Chevrolet Pickup $19.00 $38.00
31 1996 Volvo Vactor $71.50 $143.00 (2,3)
32 2007 Brush Bandit Chipper $37.00 $100.00
33 2001 Grimmer Air Compressor 175 CFM $26.00 $52.00
34 2008 Ford Escape (charged per mile)$0.56 $1.12
35 2008 Ford F-450 Utility $30.00 $60.00
36 2006 Chevrolet Pickup $19.00 $38.00
37 2008 Ford F-450 Utility $30.00 $60.00
38 1995 Ford Pickup $22.00 $44.00
39 1996 Ford Pickup F250 $22.00 $44.00
40 Workhorse Step Van $19.00 $38.00
41 2000 Utility Trailer $5.00 $10.00
42 1995 Ford Flatbed $25.00 $50.00
43 2002 Ford F-450 $30.00 $60.00
44 1974 Jacobson Mower Trailer $5.00 $10.00
45 2002 Trailer $5.00 $10.00
46 1997 Isuzu Paint Stripper $85.00 $170.00 (2)
47 1973 Tack Trailer $5.00 $10.00
L:\Productiondb\AGENDA\CCOUNCIL\0015_2407_Proposed 2009 Equipment Rental Hourly Rates.xls 1
Packet Page 181 of 930
CITY OF EDMONDS
PROPOSED 2009 HOURLY RENTAL RATES
UNIT #DESCRIPTION Intergovernmental Contractor
Rates Rates
48 2006 Ford Escape (charged per mile)$0.56 $1.12
49 1971 Weed Sprayer Trailer $5.00 $10.00
50 2005 Chevrolet Pickup $19.00 $38.00
51 2005 Ford F-450 $30.00 $60.00
52 1986 Layton Asphalt Spreader $7.00 $14.00 (1,2)
55 2001 Elgin Street Sweeper $55.00 $110.00
56 2000 Go-4 $6.90 $13.80
57 2007 Cat Backhoe 1 1/2 c.y.$39.00 $78.00
58 1999 Dodge Pickup $22.00 $44.00
59 2005 Interstate Trailer $12.50 $25.00
61 1980 Gorman Rupp Pump 25HP $9.25 $18.50
63 1993 CAT Backhoe 1 1/2 c.y.$39.00 $78.00
67 1993 Butler Asphalt Trailer $5.00 $10.00
69 1994 Water Mower Trailer $5.00 $10.00
70 1996 Ford Flatbed $25.00 $50.00
71 1994 Lukes Shoring Trailer $5.00 $10.00
72 1998 Magnum Utility Trailer $5.00 $10.00
74 2007 Towmaster Trailer $12.50 $25.00
78 1996 Walton Trailer $12.50 $25.00
79 1992 GMC Step Van $19.00 $38.00
80 2000 Grimmer Air Compressor 175 CFM $26.00 $52.00
81 2002 Chevrolet Pickup $19.00 $38.00
82 1976 Huber Min. M-700 Grader $40.00 $80.00
83 1985 Hitchman Trailer & Generator $70.00 $140.00
85 1999 Whiteman Cement Mixer $3.80 $7.60
86 1999 Dodge Flatbed $25.00 $50.00
87 1978 White Generator $70.00 $140.00
88 2004 Chevrolet Pickup $19.00 $38.00
89 2002 Chevrolet Pickup $19.00 $38.00
90 1999 Dodge Flatbed $25.00 $50.00
91 2002 Ford Mower $25.00 $50.00 (1,2)
92 1986 Multiquip Pump 25HP $9.25 $18.50
93 2008 Ford F-250 $22.00 $44.00
94 2000 Chevrolet Pickup $19.00 $38.00
95 2007 Workhorse Step Van $19.00 $38.00
96 1999 Chevrolet Flatbed $25.00 $50.00
97 2008 Ford F450 $30.00 $60.00
98 2007 Sterling Jet Truck $66.00 $132.00 (2,3)
101 1997 Versalift Bucket Truck $31.75 $63.50 (2)
L:\Productiondb\AGENDA\CCOUNCIL\0015_2407_Proposed 2009 Equipment Rental Hourly Rates.xls 2
Packet Page 182 of 930
CITY OF EDMONDS
PROPOSED 2009 HOURLY RENTAL RATES
UNIT #DESCRIPTION Intergovernmental Contractor
Rates Rates
102 2004 Chevrolet Pickup $19.00 $38.00
104 2004 Ford Taurus (charged per mile)$0.56 $1.12
105 2008 Ford Escape (charged per mile)$0.56 $1.12
106 2007 International Vactor $71.50 $143.00 (2,3)
109 2006 Toro Mower $5.00 $10.00
110 1978 Hyster Forklift $14.00 $28.00
111 1992 John Deer Tractor Mower $5.00 $10.00
113 1998 Ford Taurus (charged per mile)$0.56 $1.12
118 1999 Toro Mower $5.00 $10.00
119 1999 Ford Taurus (charged per mile)$0.56 $1.12
120 2001 Dodge Flatbed $25.00 $50.00
121 2001 Dodge Flatbed $25.00 $50.00
122 2001 Chevrolet Pickup $19.00 $38.00
123 2002 Chevrolet Pickup $19.00 $38.00
124 2002 Air Compressor $26.00 $52.00
125 2002 Dodge Flatbed $25.00 $50.00
126 2002 Dodge Flatbed $25.00 $50.00
127 2002 Chevrolet Van $19.00 $38.00
128 2002 F-250 Ford $22.00 $44.00
129 2002 Ford Flatbed F-450 $30.00 $60.00
130 2002 Crack Sealer $30.00 $60.00 (1)(2)
131 2003 Chevrolet Pickup $19.00 $38.00
132 2003 Ford F-250 $22.00 $44.00
133 2003 Isuzu Flatbed $25.00 $50.00
134 2003 Ford F-450 Flatbed $30.00 $60.00
135 2004 Ford Taurus $0.56 $1.12
136 2004 Ford F-250 $22.00 $44.00
137 2004 Air Compressor $26.00 $52.00
138 2007 Elgin (Sterling SC8000) Street Sweepe $55.00 $110.00
140 2008 Zipper Asphalt Grinder $35.00 $70.00
M-16 RESCUE BOAT 30 ft.$90.00 $180.00
474 1998 Darley Pumper 1500 GPM $95.00 $190.00
475 1998 Darley Pumper 1500 GPM $95.00 $190.00
476 1999 Ladder Truck 100 Ft.$150.00 $300.00
477 2006 Spartan Pumber 1,500 GPM $95.00 $190.00
EPD Patrolling Car (charged per mile)$0.63 $1.26
EPD Stationary Car With Engine Running $18.00 $36.00
495 1999 GMC Sonoma Pickup $19.00 $38.00
NOTES:
(1) 3 hour minimum.
(2) Operator must accompany equipment at average salary rate.
(3) 3 hr. min. $300; after 3 hours contractor rate.
L:\Productiondb\AGENDA\CCOUNCIL\0015_2407_Proposed 2009 Equipment Rental Hourly Rates.xls 3
Packet Page 183 of 930
Vehicle Description Rate
9 STR 2002 Caterpillar Loader 34.00
11 STR 2001 International Dump Truck 60.00
Snow Plow Additional 16.00
Sander Additional 5.50
13 STR 2008 Wacker - Asphalt Roller 70.00
17 STR 1994 Inter'L Dumptruck-10 Yard 60.00
Snow Plow Additional 16.00
Sander Additional 5.50
25 STR 2006 Ford F450 (Incident Response)30.00
33 STR 2001 185 Grimmer Schmidt Air Comp 26.00
46 STR 1997 Isuzu Paint Machine 85.00
47 STR Tack Trailer 1973 5.00
49 STR 1971 Weed Spraying Trailer 5.00
52 STR Model H-500-B Layton Paver 7.00
58 STR 1999 Dodge Pickup 22.00
61 STR Gor Rupp Centrif Pmp Fa6232 9.25
67 STR 1993 Butler Asphalt Trailer 5.00
70 STR 1996 F350 Ford Flatbed 25.00
72 STR 1998 Paint Trailer 5.00
74 STR 2007 Towmaster T-24 12.50
82 STR 1976 Huber Maintainer Grdr 40.00
85 STR 1999 Whiteman Cement Mixer 3.80
91 STR 2002 Ford Mower 25.00
96 STR 1999 Chevrolet 1 Ton Flatbed 25.00
110 STR 1978 Hyster Forklift Fa6291 14.00
123 STR 2002 Chevy Silverado 19.00
129 STR 2002 Ford F-450 Flatbed 30.00
130 STR 2002 Crack Sealer 30.00
132 STR 2003 Ford F-250 22.00
134 STR 2003 Ford F-450 Flatbed 30.00
137 STR Ingersall-Rand Air Compressor 26.00
140 STR 2007 Zipper Asphalt Grinder 35.00
10 STM 2001 Dodge Flatbed 25.00
22 STM 2000 International Dumptruck 43.00
Snow Plow Additional 16.00
Sander Additional 5.50
30 STM 1999 Chev Pickup 19.00
36 STM 2006 Chevrolet Silverado 19.00
55 STM 2001 Elgin Street Sweeper 55.00
57 STM 2007 Caterpillar 420E 39.00
106 STM 2007 International 7600 71.50
138 STM 2007 Elgin Street Sweeper 55.00
Vehicle #
Proposed Transportation Benefit District Equipment Rates
Packet Page 184 of 930
AM-2389 2.H.
Include the Ganahl–Hanley Log Cabin on Edmonds Register of Historic Places
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:07/21/2009
Submitted By:Kernen Lien, Planning Time:Consent
Department:Planning Type:Action
Review Committee:
Committee Action:
Information
Subject Title
Ordinance designating the Ganahl – Hanley Log Cabin, located at 120 Fifth Avenue North,
Edmonds, Washington for inclusion on the Edmonds Register of Historic Places, and directing the
Community Services Director or his designee to designate the site on the Official Zoning Map
with an “HR” Designation.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Approve the ordinance (Exhibit 1) as recommended by the Edmonds Historic Preservation
Commission.
Previous Council Action
N/A
Narrative
The Ganahl-Hanley Log Cabin is listed on the Washington State Heritage Register (Exhibit 2).
The Log Cabin was nominated for listing on the Edmonds Register of Historic Places in 2006
(Exhibits 3 & 4). The Edmonds Historic Preservation Commission reviewed the nomination to
place the Log Cabin on the Edmonds Register and determined the site is eligible for listing
pursuant to ECDC 20.45.020.E (see Exhibit 5). The proposed ordinance (Exhibit 1) completes the
listing process.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: Exhibit 1 - Ordinance
Link: Exhibit 2 - Washington State Heritiage Register Information
Link: Exhibit 3: Edmonds Register of Historic Places Nomination Form
Link: Exhibit 4: Historic Preservation Commission Minutes 11-09-2006
Link: Exhibit 5: Historic Preservation Commission Minutes 05-14-2009
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 07/15/2009 03:06 PM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 07/15/2009 03:08 PM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 07/15/2009 03:21 PM APRV
Packet Page 185 of 930
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 07/15/2009 03:21 PM APRV
Form Started By: Kernen
Lien
Started On: 07/13/2009 11:45
AM
Final Approval Date: 07/15/2009
Packet Page 186 of 930
0006.90000
kpl
07/21/2009
ORDINANCE NO. ___
AN ORDINANCE DESIGNATING THE INTERIOR AND
EXTERIOR OF THE GANAHL-HANLEY LOG CABIN AT 120
5TH AVENUE NORTH, EDMONDS, WASHINGTON FOR
INCLUSION ON THE EDMONDS REGISTER OF HISTORIC
PLACES, AND DIRECTING THE COMMUNITY SERVICES
DIRECTOR OR HIS DESIGNEE TO DESIGNATE THE SITE
ON THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP WITH AN "HR"
DESIGNATION., AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME
SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE.
WHEREAS, the Ganahl-Hanley Log Cabin at 120 5th Avenue North, Edmonds,
Washington, is currently listed on the Washington Heritage Register; and
WHEREAS, the Chapter 20.45.020(E) of the Edmonds Community Development
Code (ECDC) states that
“Properties listed on the National Register of Historic Places or the
State Register of Historic Places shall be deemed eligible for
listing in the [Edmonds] register without the requirement for
review by the historic preservation commission. Formal listing in
the Edmonds register of historic places shall only require the
owner’s consent and approval by the Edmonds city council;” and
WHEREAS, by the adoption of this ordinance the City Council has given their
written consent for such designation; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has received the recommendation of the Historic
Preservation Commission regarding the features of the site which contribute to its designation
and finds that the application meets the criteria of the ordinance as contained in Chapter 20.45 of
the ECDC, NOW, THEREFORE,
{kpl/00006.900000/} - 1 -
Packet Page 187 of 930
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Ganahl-Hanley Log Cabin at 120 5th Avenue North, Edmonds,
Washington 98020, is hereby approved for designation to the Edmonds Historic Register. Both
the interior and exterior of the building is hereby designated as significant.
Section 2. The Community Services Director, or his designee, is hereby
authorized to designate the listed site on the Edmonds zoning map with an “HR” designation.
This designation does not change or modify the underlying zone classification.
Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifi-
cally delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum, and shall take effect
five (5) days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the
title.
APPROVED:
MAYOR GARY HAAKENSON
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED:
CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY:
BY
W. SCOTT SNYDER
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: ________
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: ________
PUBLISHED: ________
EFFECTIVE DATE: ________
ORDINANCE NO. _____
{kpl/00006.900000/} - 2 -
Packet Page 188 of 930
{rwc/00006.900000/} - 3 -
SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. ____
of the City of Edmonds, Washington
On the 21st day of July, 2009, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed
Ordinance No. ____. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting of the title,
provides as follows:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DESIGNATING THE
INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR OF THE GANAHL-HANLEY LOG CABIN AT 120 5TH
AVENUE NORTH, EDMONDS, WASHINGTON FOR INCLUSION ON THE EDMONDS
REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES, DIRECTING THE COMMUNITY SERVICES
DIRECTOR OR HIS DESIGNEE TO DESIGNATE THE SITE ON THE OFFICIAL ZONING
MAP WITH AN “HR” DESIGNATION, AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL
BECOME EFFECTIVE.
The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request.
DATED this ___ day of JULY, 2009.
CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE
Packet Page 189 of 930
Packet Page 190 of 930
Packet Page 191 of 930
Packet Page 192 of 930
Packet Page 193 of 930
Packet Page 194 of 930
Packet Page 195 of 930
Packet Page 196 of 930
Packet Page 197 of 930
Packet Page 198 of 930
Packet Page 199 of 930
Packet Page 200 of 930
Packet Page 201 of 930
Packet Page 202 of 930
Packet Page 203 of 930
Packet Page 204 of 930
Packet Page 205 of 930
Packet Page 206 of 930
Packet Page 207 of 930
Packet Page 208 of 930
Packet Page 209 of 930
Packet Page 210 of 930
Packet Page 211 of 930
Packet Page 212 of 930
Packet Page 213 of 930
Packet Page 214 of 930
Packet Page 215 of 930
Packet Page 216 of 930
Packet Page 217 of 930
Packet Page 218 of 930
Packet Page 219 of 930
Packet Page 220 of 930
Packet Page 221 of 930
Packet Page 222 of 930
Packet Page 223 of 930
Packet Page 224 of 930
Historic Preservation Commission Minutes
May 14, 2009 Page 4
Application to Determine the Eligibility of the Ganahl-Hanley Log Cabin for Placement on the Edmonds Register of
Historic Places
Chair Eccleshall noted that the Ganahl-Hanley Log Cabin is already identified on the State Register of Historic Places and
was previously discussed by the Commission. Mayor Haakenson expressed concern that if the property is listed on the
Register, the City’s ability to repair the structure could be limited. Once he understood that regular upkeep and maintenance
would be allowed, he withdrew his concern. It was noted that the cabin was originally built in another location by Actress
Bridgette Hanley’s family and was later moved to its current site.
Chair Eccleshall referred to the draft ordinance, which indicates that the property meets the nomination criteria because it is
directly associated with an individual who made an important contribution to the community and/or group of people. In
addition, it has strong artistic, architectural or engineering qualities or displays unusual materials or craftwork belonging to a
historic era. While the structure was removed from its original location, it is significant primarily for its architectural value
and is the only surviving structure significantly associated with a historic person or event.
COMMISSIONER BAUER MOVED THAT THE NOMINATION INCLUDE BOTH THE INTERIOR AND
EXTERIOR OF THE STRUCTURE, BUT NOT THE SITE, ITSELF. COMMISSIONER DEINER-KARR
SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
It was noted that the City Council has not yet offered their consent to list the three city-owned properties on the register. The
Commission discussed whether or not it would be necessary to send a formal letter to Mayor Haakenson, requesting consent.
Mr. Chave explained that once the Commission has recommended approval of the three ordinances (Ganahl-Hanley Log
Cabin structure, Brackett’s Landing site and Olympic Hotel Site), staff could merely send them forward to the City Council
for consent and approval at the same time.
COMMISSIONER VOGEL MOVED THE COMMISSION FORWARD THE GANAHL-HANLEY LOG CABIN
TO THE CITY COUNCIL WITH THE RECOMMENDATION THAT BOTH THE INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR
OF THE STRUCTURE BE LISTED ON THE EDMONDS REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES.
COMMISSIONER BAUER SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Commissioner Bauer reported that she attended a recent Edmonds Memorial Cemetery Board Meeting to discuss the
proposed nomination for the cemetery property but she has not heard back from them. She agreed to contact Mr. McIntosh,
the Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services Director, for an update on the status of the nomination.
COMMITTEE REPORTS
Recap of Saturday Work Session
Chair Eccleshall reviewed that the Commission reached the following conclusions:
It would be appropriate to pursue the concept of historic overlays within the City.
It would be helpful to tour the City to figure out which districts should fit into individual historic overlays and then
approach the property owners within those areas one section at a time.
The intent would be to eventually have a historic overlay that incorporates most of the Edmonds Bowl area.
Main Street would be the most difficult historic overlay to create. Therefore, they should attempt to grow the momentum
around Main Street and hope the property owners follow along with the concept.
Chair Eccleshall advised that he would bring the large map to the next meeting so the Commission could start to identify
specific zones where historic overlays could be applied. He reminded the Commission that they previously agreed that the
4th Avenue Corridor should be the first overlay, and the Commissioners agreed to meet within the next month to talk about
how to proceed with preparing draft ideas to begin their conversation.
Packet Page 225 of 930
AM-2394 3.
Presentation on Levy Option #2
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:07/21/2009
Submitted By:Jana Spellman, City Council
Submitted For:Council President Wilson Time:30 Minutes
Department:City Council Type:Information
Review Committee:
Committee Action:
Information
Subject Title
Presentation on Levy Option #2 by Council President Wilson and Councilmember Bernheim.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Previous Council Action
At the October 28, 2008 Council Meeting the Council unanimously passed a motion to form a
work group tasked with finding new revenue sources, such as a parks levy, TBD, property tax lid
lift, etc., in place of or in addition to a RFA.
Attachment 1: 10/28/08 Council Minutes
The Council passed the 2009-2010 Budget at the December 2, 2008 meeting with a Budget Note
from the Council.
Attachment 2: 12/2/2008 Council Minutes and Budget Note
Attachment 3: Ord. 3711
During the February 17, 2009 Council Meeting, Council President Wilson reported the City
Council held its annual retreat on February 6 & 7 in City Hall. The 12-hour retreat produced a
clear work plan for 2009. Putting the City on a stable financial footing was paramount among
Councilmembers’ concerns. The retreat included extensive discussion regarding the levy that will
be on the November ballot. The Council developed a time line for action for the November levy;
the Council plans to create the most extensive, most engaging and most thorough vetting process
ever implemented. It will include a Citizen Review Committee open to nearly all citizens, public
hearings before the Council, and public open houses. Upon approval of the time line, more details
will be provided regarding the Citizen Review Committee to invite citizen participation.
Attachment 4: 2009 Edmonds Levy Timeline
During the February 24, 2009 Council Meeting Council President Wilson explained Mayor
Haakenson provided the State of the City Report to the Rotary Club which has typically been the
forum for this information. He requested Mayor Haakenson make the same presentation at the
Council meeting because it was an appropriate message and would frame the conversation with the
community in the coming months about the City’s financial situation and the November levy.
Attachment 5: 2/24/09 Council Minutes.
Packet Page 226 of 930
At the same meeting, Council President Wilson informed the Council that the internal Levy
Review Committee had been meeting frequently to develop a plan for the Citizen Levy Review
Committee that will meet the last two Mondays in March and the first two Mondays in April and
stated that applications are available on the City’s website.
The Citizen Levy Review Committee met on March 23, March 30, April 6, and April 13, 2009 in
the Brackett Room of City Hall. The meetings were held from 6:00 to 8:30 p.m. The Committee
was made up of 8 color-coded teams: Blue, Green, Grey, Orange, Pink, Purple, Red, and Yellow.
On April 21, 2009 the Citizen Levy Review Committee made its report to the Council on the
majority and minority recommendations regarding going forward with a levy in November of
2009.
These recommendations are put in alphabetical order according to color of teams.
Attachment 6: Citizen Levy Review Committee Levy Recommendations
The Council formed the Revenue Work Group in October of 2008 by a unanimous vote. We
approved the general levy scope. In February 2009, the 2009 Levy Timeline was affirmed
unanimously. The Citizen Levy Review Committee was formed, completed its work and made a
series of recommendations. One recommendation was to move forward with the levy ranging from
$2 to $4.3 million. Other comments included making the levy more specific than it currently is.
This Resolution directs staff to further refine and develop options for Council consideration and
additional public review during the summer of 2009.
Attachment 7: Draft Resolution Regarding the 2009 Property Tax Levy
The Citizen Levy Review Committee met and completed its work in March and April 2009 per the
Council-affirmed 2009 Levy Timeline. They made a series of recommendations. One of the more
prominent recommendations was that the Council and Mayor should make sure this fiscal situation
does not occur again and make economic development a renewed focus of Council activity.
Another series of comments from the Citizen Levy Review Committee indicated an interest on the
part of citizens to continue their involvement in seeking revenue options for the City. It was
broadly affirmed and agreed that the City faces a fundamental revenue shortage rather than an
expense problem. This Resolution provides two pathways for work to continue to be focused on
economic development to complement the 2009 Levy.
Attachment 8: Resolution Regarding Addressing the Long-Term Revenue Challenges
Facing the City of Edmonds
Attachment 9: 4-21-09 Council Minutes
At the April 28 Council Meeting, public comment on the draft levy proposal and draft Resolution
regarding the 2009 property tax levy was received.
Attachment 10: 4/28/09 Council Minutes
At the May 5, 2009 Council Meeting, public comment on the draft levy proposal and draft
Resolution regarding the 2009 property tax levy was received.
Attachment 11: 5/5/09 Council Minutes.
At the May 19, 2009 Council meeting a resolution was proposed supporting continued refinement
of and public input on the 2009 proposed levy. Mayor Pro Tem Wilson asked if Council supported
Packet Page 227 of 930
a levy of $4.3 million or $3.75 million. Council President Pro Tem Wambolt preferred $3.75
million; anticipating voter approval of a $4.3 million levy would be more difficult.
Councilmember Peterson agreed with Council President Pro Tem Wambolt.
MAYOR PRO TEM WILSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER OLSON, TO
ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 1200 (REGARDING THE 2009 PROPERTY TAX LEVY) WITH
THE CHANGE MOVING THE STAFF PRESENTATIONS FROM JUNE 2 TO JUNE 16.
Mayor Pro Tem Wilson noted most of the items in the General Operations Levy were also in the
Parks, Public Safety and Families Levy; approximately 80% of the items were the same.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Attachment 12: 5/19/09 Council Minutes.
Attachment 13: Resolution #1200
At the June 2, 2009 Council Meeting, the Council passed Ordinance #3735 approving (approved
unanimously on Consent Agenda) the establishment of an Economic Development Commission.
Establishment of this Commission was a recommendation of the Citizen Levy Review
Committee.
Attachment 14: 6/2/09 Council Minutes
Attachment 15: Ord. #3735 Establishing an Economic Development Commission through
December 31, 2010
During the June 16, 2009 Council Meeting the Council continued their discussion regarding the
levy options. Public comment was also taken regarding the 2009 Levy Options.
Attachment 16: $3.75M Levy Forecast
Attachment 17: June 9, 2009 Forecast
Attachment 18: Summary of Levy Decision Packages
Attachment 19: Cuts Previously Discussed
Attachment 20: Levy Decision Package Narratives
Attachment 21: 6/16/2009 Council Minutes
During the June 23, 2009 Council Meeting public comments was again taken on the 2009 Levy.
Agenda item 5 was discussion and proposed resolution regarding the 2009 Levy. Council
President Wilson moved, seconded by Councilmember Bernheim for approval of Resolution No.
1201 reaffirming the Council Commitment to a No ember Property Tax Levy. The motion carried
unanimously.
Attachment 22: Resolution #1201
Attachment 23: 6/23/09 Council
During the July 7, 2009 Council Meeting, each Councilmember appointed their designee to the
Citizens' Economic Development Commission.
Attachment 24: 7/7/2009 Council Minutes
Narrative
Packet Page 228 of 930
Attachment 25 is Levy Option #2 and will be discussed by Council President Wilson and
Councilmember Bernheim.
Attachment 26 is a copy of the PowerPoint Presentation for Levy Option #2.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: Attach 1 10/28/09 CM
Link: Attach 2 12/2/08 CM
Link: Attach 3 Ord. 3711
Link: Attach 4 Levy Timeline
Link: Attach 5 2/24/09 CM
Link: Attach 6 CLRC Reco
Link: Attach 7 Draft Reso 2009 Property Tax Levy
Link: Attach 8 Reso Long Term Revenue Challenges
Link: Attach 9 4/21/09 CM
Link: Attach 10 4/28/09 CM
Link: Attach 11 5/5/09 CM
Link: Attach 12 5/19/09 CM
Link: Attach 13 Reso #1200
Link: Attach 14 6/2/09 CM
Link: Attach 15 Ord #3735 Establish Citizens' Eco Dev Com
Link: Attach 16 $3.75M Levy Forecast
Link: Attach 17 June 9, 2009 Forecast
Link: Attach 18 Summary of Levy Dec Packages
Link: Attach 19 Cuts Previously Discussed
Link: Attach 20 Levy Dec Package Narratives
Link: Attach 21 6/16/09 CM
Link: Attach 22 Reso #1201
Link: Attach 23 6/23/09 CM
Link: Attach 24 7/7/2009 CM
Link: Attach 25 Wilson-Bernheim Levy Option#2.pdf
Link: Levy Prop 2 Presentation
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 07/16/2009 11:17 AM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 07/16/2009 11:30 AM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 07/16/2009 12:54 PM APRV
Form Started By: Jana Started On: 07/14/2009 03:44
Packet Page 229 of 930
Form Started By: Jana
Spellman
Started On: 07/14/2009 03:44
PM
Final Approval Date: 07/16/2009
Packet Page 230 of 930
Packet Page 231 of 930
Packet Page 232 of 930
Packet Page 233 of 930
Packet Page 234 of 930
Packet Page 235 of 930
Packet Page 236 of 930
Packet Page 237 of 930
Packet Page 238 of 930
Packet Page 239 of 930
Packet Page 240 of 930
Packet Page 241 of 930
Packet Page 242 of 930
Packet Page 243 of 930
Packet Page 244 of 930
Packet Page 245 of 930
Packet Page 246 of 930
Packet Page 247 of 930
Packet Page 248 of 930
Packet Page 249 of 930
Packet Page 250 of 930
Packet Page 251 of 930
Packet Page 252 of 930
Packet Page 253 of 930
Packet Page 254 of 930
Packet Page 255 of 930
Packet Page 256 of 930
Packet Page 257 of 930
Packet Page 258 of 930
Packet Page 259 of 930
Packet Page 260 of 930
Packet Page 261 of 930
Packet Page 262 of 930
Packet Page 263 of 930
Packet Page 264 of 930
Packet Page 265 of 930
Packet Page 266 of 930
Packet Page 267 of 930
Packet Page 268 of 930
Packet Page 269 of 930
Packet Page 270 of 930
Packet Page 271 of 930
Packet Page 272 of 930
Packet Page 273 of 930
Packet Page 274 of 930
Packet Page 275 of 930
Packet Page 276 of 930
Packet Page 277 of 930
Packet Page 278 of 930
Packet Page 279 of 930
Packet Page 280 of 930
Packet Page 281 of 930
Packet Page 282 of 930
Packet Page 283 of 930
Packet Page 284 of 930
Packet Page 285 of 930
Packet Page 286 of 930
Packet Page 287 of 930
Packet Page 288 of 930
Packet Page 289 of 930
Packet Page 290 of 930
Packet Page 291 of 930
Packet Page 292 of 930
Packet Page 293 of 930
Packet Page 294 of 930
Packet Page 295 of 930
Packet Page 296 of 930
Packet Page 297 of 930
Packet Page 298 of 930
Packet Page 299 of 930
Packet Page 300 of 930
Packet Page 301 of 930
Packet Page 302 of 930
Packet Page 303 of 930
Packet Page 304 of 930
Packet Page 305 of 930
Packet Page 306 of 930
Packet Page 307 of 930
Packet Page 308 of 930
Packet Page 309 of 930
Packet Page 310 of 930
Packet Page 311 of 930
Packet Page 312 of 930
Packet Page 313 of 930
Packet Page 314 of 930
Packet Page 315 of 930
Packet Page 316 of 930
Packet Page 317 of 930
Packet Page 318 of 930
Packet Page 319 of 930
Packet Page 320 of 930
Packet Page 321 of 930
Packet Page 322 of 930
Packet Page 323 of 930
Packet Page 324 of 930
Packet Page 325 of 930
Packet Page 326 of 930
Packet Page 327 of 930
Packet Page 328 of 930
Packet Page 329 of 930
Packet Page 330 of 930
Packet Page 331 of 930
Packet Page 332 of 930
Packet Page 333 of 930
Packet Page 334 of 930
Packet Page 335 of 930
Packet Page 336 of 930
Packet Page 337 of 930
Packet Page 338 of 930
Packet Page 339 of 930
Packet Page 340 of 930
Packet Page 341 of 930
The following compares two levy options. One is a “technology and general operations levy” or “Prop
1,” which was presented by the mayor in June. The second, “Prop 2,” would be called a “Public Safety
and Parks Levy” and will be presented July 21st.
Both levies are $3.75m in total, or equal to $18.50 per month for the average Edmonds home
($456,000). Both levies fully fund existing services (with 2 exceptions in Prop 2), provide for reserves to
carry us into the future, and begin the process of catching up with deferred investments from the last
decade.
Prop 1 Prop 2
1. Fire: Protective Clothing 114,000 114,000
General Operations (One-time purchases)
2. Fire: SCBA Air Compressor 39,000 39,000
3. Fire: Fire Hose Replacement 39,000 39,000
4. Fire: ALS Equipment for Backup Unit 40,000 40,000
5. Fire: Standardize Equipment on Eng 20 42,000 42,000
6. Fire: Replacement Tools and Equipment 50,000 50,000
7. Parks: Lawn Mower 15,000 15,000
8. Econ Dev: Resources/Advertising
$339,000 $549,000
$210,000 ($70k/yr, 3 yrs)
9. Parks: Senior Center
General Operations (On-going)
$0 $100,000
$100,000
10. Clerk: Document Mgmt System 100,000 100,000
Technology (One-time purchases)
11. IS: Offsite Data Backup 73,0001
12. IS: Offsite Server 24,000
13. IS: Storage Server Facilities Impr. 25,000
14. IS: Upgrade to GigE 9,000
15. IS: Basic Wireless Controllers 37,000
16. FIre: ePCR Hardware and Software 40,000 40,000
17. Dev Serv: Automated Permit Package 25,000
18. Dev Serv: Digital Records Initiative 30,000
19. IS: General Technology Purchases 160,000
20.
21.
$363,000 $240,000
1 Information Services expenditures have offsetting funding from the utility fund. In total, all of the IS line items
accumulate $104,000 in utility fund funding.
Packet Page 342 of 930
Prop 1 Prop 2
22. IS: GIS Analyst 87,450
Personnel (On-Going Costs)
23. IS: Server/Apps Support Staff 66,650
24. IS: Webmaster & Analyst 88,750
25. IS: Helpdesk Staff 38,050
26. Fire: Fire Inspector/Educator/Help 109,877 109,877
27. Police: Crime Prevention 108,803 108,803
28. Police: Staff Assistant 60,421 60,421
29. Parks: Parks Maintenance Worker 68,330 68,330
30. HR: Part Time HR Assistant 26,600
31. Clerk: Administrative Assistant 60,000 60,000
32. Public Works: Facilities Maintenance 55,900
33. Police: 2 New Uniformed Police Officers 220,000
34.
35.
36.
$770,831 $627,431
39. Public Works: Building Maintenance 200,000
Building Maintenance (On-going)
40. Parks: Yost/Senior Center/Boys & Girls/ Meadowdale 250,000
41. Fire: Station 17 & 20 150,000
42.
$200,000 $400,000
One-time $702,000 $789,900
Ongoing $970,831 $1,127,431
Subtotal 1,672,831 $1,916,431
Utility fund offset -$104,000
Cuts from “Baseline” - $91,006 2
Total $1,508,831 $1,825,425
2 This cost will be offset by savings $91,006 for not funding the Animal Control and DARE programs in Prop 2 which
are funded in Prop 1. There are 2 Animal Control positions currently funded. The third is currently unfilled and
this would not fund that unfilled position. The DARE Program is currently scheduled to be cut for 2009-2010
Packet Page 343 of 930
Total expenditures: both one-time and on-going
Fire 473,877 28.3% 623,877 32.8%
Dept Prop 1 % Prop 2 %
Police 169,224 10.1 389,224 20.5
Parks 83,330 5.0 433,330 22.8
Econ Dev 210,000 11.0
Public Works 255,900 15.3
Information Services 448,900 26.8 100,000 5.3
Human Resources 26,600 1.6
Clerk 160,000 9.6 160,000 8.4
Dev Services
55,000 3.3
Subtotal $1,672,831 $1,901,431
Offsets outlined above
-$104,000 -$91,006
Total $1,568,831 $1,810,425
Ending fund balance
Year Target 3
2010 $3,077,822 $3,012,724 $2,760,130
Prop 1 Prop 2
2011 $3,138,860 $4,364,200 $3,946,012
2012 $3,256,552 $5,071,433 $4,487,651
2013 $3,381,646 $5,122,985 $4,373,609
2014 $3,518,401 $4,420,449 $3,505,479
2015 $3,649,797 $3,053,314 $ 1,972,750
Current projected 2010 ending fund balance without a levy = $1,308,305. These numbers do not
account for inflation in personnel costs. Non-personnel ongoing costs would be held in 2010 dollars in
any case (Senior Center funding would remain at an additional $100,000). Marginal cost increases are in
2010 numbers. Also, all economic development dollars are allocated to 2010, even though those funds
are proposed to be spread over three years.
3 This comes from City Finance Dept goal of reserves equal to 1/12 of the annual expenses.
43.4% 76.1%
Packet Page 344 of 930
Le
v
y
Pr
o
p
o
s
a
l
#2
Pr
e
s
e
n
t
e
d
by
DJ
Wi
l
s
o
n
& St
e
v
e
Be
r
n
h
e
i
m
Ju
l
y
21
st
, 20
0
9
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
34
5
of
93
0
Wh
a
t
Bo
t
h
Pr
o
p
o
s
a
l
s
Do
1.
Fu
n
d
ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
se
r
v
i
c
e
s
2.
Se
t
as
i
d
e
re
s
e
r
v
e
s
to
pa
y
for the next
5 ye
a
r
s
of
op
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
3.
Be
g
i
n
to
fu
n
d
in
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
s
deferred
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
34
6
of
93
0
Ma
j
o
r
Is
s
u
e
s
•
Di
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
is
in
th
e
fu
n
d
i
n
g
of
de
f
e
r
r
e
d
in
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
s
–
Fo
c
u
s
on
te
c
h
n
o
l
o
g
y
,
ge
n
e
r
a
l
op
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
–
Fo
c
u
s
on
pu
b
l
i
c
sa
f
e
t
y
,
pa
r
k
s
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
34
7
of
93
0
Co
m
p
a
r
i
n
g
th
e
Two
Pr
o
p
1P r o p 2
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
Op
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
(O
n
e
‐ti
m
e
pu
r
c
h
a
s
e
s
)
1.
Fi
r
e
:
Pr
o
t
e
c
t
i
v
e
Cl
o
t
h
i
n
g
11
4
,
0
0
0
114,000
2.
Fi
r
e
:
SC
B
A
Ai
r
Co
m
p
r
e
s
s
o
r
39
,
0
0
0
39,000
3.
Fi
r
e
:
Fi
r
e
Ho
s
e
Re
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
39
,
0
0
0
39,000
4.
Fi
r
e
:
AL
S
Eq
u
i
p
m
e
n
t
fo
r
Ba
c
k
u
p
Un
i
t
40
,
0
0
0
40,000
5.
Fi
r
e
:
St
a
n
d
a
r
d
i
z
e
Eq
u
i
p
m
e
n
t
on
En
g
20
42
,
0
0
0
42,000
6.
Fi
r
e
:
Re
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
To
o
l
s
an
d
Eq
u
i
p
m
e
n
t
50
,
0
0
0
50,000
7.
Pa
r
k
s
:
La
w
n
Mo
w
e
r
15
,
0
0
0
15,000
8.
Ec
o
n
De
v
:
Re
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
/
A
d
v
e
r
t
i
s
i
n
g
$210,000
$3
3
9
,
0
0
0
$549,000
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
34
8
of
93
0
Co
m
p
a
r
i
n
g
th
e
Two
Pr
o
p
1P r o p 2
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
Op
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
(O
n
‐go
i
n
g
)
9.
Pa
r
k
s
:
Se
n
i
o
r
Ce
n
t
e
r
$100,000
$0
$100,000
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
34
9
of
93
0
Co
m
p
a
r
i
n
g
th
e
Two
Pr
o
p
1P r o p 2
Te
c
h
n
o
l
o
g
y
(O
n
e
‐ti
m
e
pu
r
c
h
a
s
e
s
)
10
.
Cl
e
r
k
:
Do
c
u
m
e
n
t
Mg
m
t
Sy
s
t
e
m
10
0
,
0
0
0
100,000
11
.
IS
:
Of
f
s
i
t
e
Da
t
a
Ba
c
k
u
p
73
,
0
0
0
12
.
IS
:
Of
f
s
i
t
e
Se
r
v
e
r
24
,
0
0
0
13
.
IS
:
St
o
r
a
g
e
Se
r
v
e
r
Fa
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
Im
p
r
.
25
,
0
0
0
14
.
IS
:
Up
g
r
a
d
e
to
Gi
g
E
9,
0
0
0
15
.
IS
:
Ba
s
i
c
Wi
r
e
l
e
s
s
Co
n
t
r
o
l
l
e
r
s
37
,
0
0
0
16
.
FI
r
e
:
eP
C
R
Ha
r
d
w
a
r
e
an
d
So
f
t
w
a
r
e
40,000
40
,
0
0
0
17
.
De
v
Se
r
v
:
Au
t
o
m
a
t
e
d
Pe
r
m
i
t
Pa
c
k
a
g
e
25
,
0
0
0
18
.
De
v
Se
r
v
:
Di
g
i
t
a
l
Re
c
o
r
d
s
In
i
t
i
a
t
i
v
e
30
,
0
0
0
19
.
IS
:
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
Te
c
h
n
o
l
o
g
y
Pu
r
c
h
a
s
e
s
160,000
20
.
21
.
$3
6
3
,
0
0
0
$240,000
In
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
Se
r
v
i
c
e
s
ex
p
e
n
d
i
t
u
r
e
s
ha
v
e
of
f
s
e
t
t
i
n
g
fu
n
d
i
n
g
fr
o
m
th
e
utility fund. In total, all of
th
e
IS
li
n
e
it
e
m
s
ac
c
u
m
u
l
a
t
e
$1
0
4
,
0
0
0
in
ut
i
l
i
t
y
fu
n
d
fu
n
d
i
n
g
.
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
35
0
of
93
0
Co
m
p
a
r
i
n
g
th
e
Two
Pr
o
p
1P r o p 2
Pe
r
s
o
n
n
e
l
(O
n
‐Go
i
n
g
Co
s
t
s
)
22
.
IS
:
GI
S
An
a
l
y
s
t
87
,
4
5
0
23
.
IS
:
Se
r
v
e
r
/
A
p
p
s
Su
p
p
o
r
t
St
a
f
f
66
,
6
5
0
24
.
IS
:
We
b
m
a
s
t
e
r
& An
a
l
y
s
t
88,750
25
.
IS
:
He
l
p
d
e
s
k
St
a
f
f
38
,
0
5
0
26
.
Fi
r
e
:
Fi
r
e
In
s
p
e
c
t
o
r
/
E
d
u
c
a
t
o
r
/
H
e
l
p
10
9
,
8
7
7
109,877
27
.
Po
l
i
c
e
:
Cr
i
m
e
Pr
e
v
e
n
t
i
o
n
10
8
,
8
0
3
108,803
28
.
Po
l
i
c
e
:
St
a
f
f
As
s
i
s
t
a
n
t
60
,
4
2
1
60,421
29
.
Pa
r
k
s
:
Pa
r
k
s
Ma
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
Wo
r
k
e
r
68
,
3
3
0
68,330
30
.
HR
:
Pa
r
t
Ti
m
e
HR
As
s
i
s
t
a
n
t
26
,
6
0
0
31
.
Cl
e
r
k
:
Ad
m
i
n
i
s
t
r
a
t
i
v
e
As
s
i
s
t
a
n
t
60
,
0
0
0
60,000
32
.
Pu
b
l
i
c
Wo
r
k
s
:
Fa
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
Ma
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
55
,
9
0
0
33
.
Po
l
i
c
e
:
2 Ne
w
Un
i
f
o
r
m
e
d
Po
l
i
c
e
Of
f
i
c
e
r
s
220,000
34
.
35
.
36
.
$7
7
0
,
8
3
1
$627,431
In
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
Se
r
v
i
c
e
s
ex
p
e
n
d
i
t
u
r
e
s
ha
v
e
of
f
s
e
t
t
i
n
g
fu
n
d
i
n
g
fr
o
m
th
e
ut
i
l
i
t
y
fu
n
d
.
In total, all of the IS line items
ac
c
u
m
u
l
a
t
e
$1
0
4
,
0
0
0
in
ut
i
l
i
t
y
fu
n
d
fu
n
d
i
n
g
.
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
35
1
of
93
0
Co
m
p
a
r
i
n
g
th
e
Two
Pr
o
p
1P r o p 2
Bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
Ma
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
(O
n
‐go
i
n
g
)
39
.
Pu
b
l
i
c
Wo
r
k
s
:
Bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
Ma
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
20
0
,
0
0
0
40
.
Pa
r
k
s
:
Yo
s
t
/
S
e
n
i
o
r
Ce
n
t
e
r
/
250,000
Bo
y
s
& Gi
r
l
s
/
M
e
a
d
o
w
d
a
l
e
Cl
u
b
h
o
u
s
e
41
.
Fi
r
e
:
St
a
t
i
o
n
17
& 20
150,000
42
.
$2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$400,000
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
35
2
of
93
0
Co
m
p
a
r
i
n
g
th
e
Two
Pr
o
p
1P
r o p 2
On
e
‐ti
m
e
$7
0
2
,
0
0
0
$7
8
9
,
9
0
0
On
g
o
i
n
g
$9
7
0
,
8
3
1
$1
,
1
2
7
,
4
3
1
Su
b
t
o
t
a
l
1,
6
7
2
,
8
3
1
$1
,
9
1
6
,
4
3
1
Ut
i
l
i
t
y fu
n
d
of
f
s
e
t
‐$1
0
4
,
0
0
0
Cu
t
s
fr
o
m
“B
a
s
e
l
i
n
e
”
‐
$9
1
,
0
0
6
To
t
a
l
$1
,
5
0
8
,
8
3
1
$1
,
8
2
5
,
4
2
5
Th
e
co
s
t
fo
r
Pr
o
p
2 wi
l
l
be
of
f
s
e
t
by
sa
v
i
n
g
s
$9
1
,
0
0
6
by
no
t
fu
n
d
i
n
g
th
e
Animal Control and DARE
pr
o
g
r
a
m
s
wh
i
c
h
ar
e
fu
n
d
e
d
in
Pr
o
p
1.
Th
e
r
e
ar
e
2 An
i
m
a
l
Co
n
t
r
o
l
positions currently funded.
Th
e
th
i
r
d
is
cu
r
r
e
n
t
l
y
un
f
i
l
l
e
d
an
d
th
i
s
wo
u
l
d
no
t
fu
n
d
th
a
t
un
f
i
l
l
e
d
position. The DARE Program
is
cu
r
r
e
n
t
l
y
sc
h
e
d
u
l
e
d
to
be
cu
t
fo
r
20
0
9
‐20
1
0
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
35
3
of
93
0
Co
m
p
a
r
i
n
g
th
e
Two
To
t
a
l
ex
p
e
n
d
i
t
u
r
e
s
:
bo
t
h
on
e
‐ti
m
e
an
d
on
‐go
i
n
g
De
p
t
Pr
o
p
1%
P rop 2%
Fi
r
e
47
3
,
8
7
7
28
.
3
%
623,877 32.8%
Po
l
i
c
e
16
9
,
2
2
4
10
.
1
389,224 20.5
Pa
r
k
s
83
,
3
3
0
5.
0
433,330 22.8
Ec
o
n
De
v
210,000 11.0
Pu
b
l
i
c
Wo
r
k
s
25
5
,
9
0
0
15
.
3
In
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
Se
r
v
i
c
e
s
44
8
,
9
0
0
26
.
8
100,000 5.3
Hu
m
a
n
Re
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
26
,
6
0
0
1.
6
Cl
e
r
k
16
0
,
0
0
0
9.
6
160,000 8.4
De
v
Se
r
v
i
c
e
s
55
,
0
0
0
3.
3
Su
b
t
o
t
a
l
$1
,
6
7
2
,
8
3
1
$1,901,431
Of
f
s
e
t
s
ou
t
l
i
n
e
d
ab
o
v
e
‐$1
0
4
,
0
0
0
‐$91,006
To
t
a
l
$1
,
5
6
8
,
8
3
1
$1,810,425
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
35
4
of
93
0
En
d
i
n
g
Fu
n
d
Balance
YE
A
R
TA
R
G
E
T
PR
O
P
1
PROP 2
20
1
0
$3
,
0
7
7
,
8
2
2
$3
,
0
1
2
,
7
2
4
$2,760,130
20
1
1
$3
,
1
3
8
,
8
6
0
$4
,
3
6
4
,
2
0
0
$3,946,012
20
1
2
$3
,
2
5
6
,
5
5
2
$5
,
0
7
1
,
4
3
3
$4,487,651
20
1
3
$3
,
3
8
1
,
6
4
6
$5
,
1
2
2
,
9
8
5
$4,373,609
20
1
4
$3
,
5
1
8
,
4
0
1
$4
,
4
2
0
,
4
4
9
$3,505,479
20
1
5
$3
,
6
4
9
,
7
9
7
$3
,
0
5
3
,
3
1
4
$ 1,972,750
*N
u
m
b
e
r
s
no
t
ad
j
u
s
t
e
d
fo
r
inflation
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
35
5
of
93
0
AM-2403 4.
Resolution and Final Action on the 2009 Levy
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:07/21/2009
Submitted By:Jana Spellman, City Council
Submitted For:Council President Wilson Time:30 Minutes
Department:City Council Type:Action
Review Committee:
Committee Action:
Information
Subject Title
Resolution and final action on the 2009 Levy.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Previous Council Action
Narrative
This is anticipated to be the Council's final action on the size and scope of the 2009 Levy.
For Council consideration and discussion, Councilmember Bernheim provided a sample resolution
authorizing the levy, and a sample ballot proposition as it would appear to the voters (copies
attached).
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: Councilmember Bernheim Attachment
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 07/16/2009 11:17 AM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 07/16/2009 11:30 AM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 07/16/2009 12:54 PM APRV
Form Started By: Jana
Spellman
Started On: 07/16/2009 10:52
AM
Final Approval Date: 07/16/2009
Packet Page 356 of 930
Packet Page 357 of 930
Packet Page 358 of 930
Packet Page 359 of 930
Packet Page 360 of 930
Packet Page 361 of 930
AM-2393 5.
"Edmonds Bank" Placement on the Edmonds Register of Historic Places
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:07/21/2009
Submitted By:Kernen Lien, Planning Time:10 Minutes
Department:Planning Type:Action
Review Committee:
Committee Action:
Information
Subject Title
Public hearing on the recommendation of the Historic Preservation Commission to
determine that the “Edmonds Bank” is eligible for placement on the Edmonds Register of
Historic Places. (Applicant: HPC / File No. HPC-09-8).
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Find that the "Edmonds Bank" meets the criteria contained in ECDC 20.45.010 and approve the
ordinance (Exhibit 1) designating the site of the "Edmonds Bank" for inclusion on the Edmonds
Register of Historic Places.
Previous Council Action
None.
Narrative
The "Edmonds Bank," located at 324-326 Main Street, was nominated for listing on the Edmonds
Register of Historic Places in 2009 (Exhibit 2) and the Edmonds Historic Preservation
Commission subsequently received the property owners' written consent (Exhibit 3) for listing the
property. The Edmonds Historic Preservation Commission reviewed the nomination to place the
"Edmonds Bank" on the Edmonds Register at a public hearing on May 14, 2009 and concluded
that the site is eligible for listing pursuant to the designation criteria in ECDC 20.45.010 (Exhibit
4).
Although not required, it has been Council policy to hold a public hearing for properties not on the
State or National Historic Registers prior to making the final determination on whether the
property may be listed on the Edmonds Historic Register. Because the owner has already granted
permission to list the property, if the Council finds that the nomination meets the criteria for
designation, than the ordinance contained in Exhibit 1 can be approved by the Council to complete
the process.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: Exhibit 1 - Ordinance
Link: Exhibit 2 - Nomination Form
Link: Exhibit 3 - Property Owners Authorization
Packet Page 362 of 930
Link: Exhibit 4 - Historic Preservation commission Minutes 05-14-2009
Link: Exhibit 5 - Edmonds Bank Historic Preservation Commission Staff Report
Link: Exhibit 6 - PowerPoint presentation for public hearing
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 Development Services Rob Chave 07/16/2009 02:26 PM APRV
2 City Clerk Sandy Chase 07/16/2009 02:31 PM APRV
3 Mayor Gary Haakenson 07/16/2009 02:33 PM APRV
4 Final Approval Sandy Chase 07/16/2009 02:51 PM APRV
Form Started By: Kernen Lien Started On: 07/14/2009 03:16
PM
Final Approval Date: 07/16/2009
Packet Page 363 of 930
0006.90000
kpl
07/21/2009
ORDINANCE NO. ___
AN ORDINANCE DESIGNATING THE EXTERIOR OF THE
EDMONDS BANK AT 324 - 326 MAIN STREET, EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON FOR INCLUSION ON THE EDMONDS
REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES, AND DIRECTING THE
COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR OR HIS DESIGNEE TO
DESIGNATE THE SITE ON THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP
WITH AN "HR" DESIGNATION., AND FIXING A TIME
WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE.
WHEREAS, the building which housed the Edmonds Bank at 324 - 326 Main
Street, Edmonds, Washington, is included on the Historic Survey of Downtown Edmonds
prepared by BOLA Architecture in conjunction with the Washington State Office of
Archaeology and Historic Preservation in October, 2004, as a property that is potentially eligible
for listing on the Edmonds Register of Historic Places; and
WHEREAS, the Edmonds Historic Preservation Commission held a public
hearing on May 14, 2009, to consider the eligibility of the Edmonds Bank for listing on the
Edmonds Register of Historic Places; and
WHEREAS, after consideration of the staff recommendation the Commission
unanimously voted to recommend to the City Council that the Edmonds Bank be listed on the
Edmonds Register of Historic Places; and
WHEREAS, the owner(s) have given their written consent for such designation;
and
{kpl/00006.900000/} - 1 -
Packet Page 364 of 930
WHEREAS, the City Council has received the recommendation of the Historic
Preservation Commission regarding the features of the site which contribute to its designation
and finds that the application meets the criteria of the ordinance as contained in Chapter 20.45 of
the ECDC, NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The building at 324 - 326 Main Street Edmonds, Washington 98020,
which formerly housed the Edmonds Bank, is hereby approved for designation to the Edmonds
Historic Register. The exterior of the building is hereby designated as significant.
Section 2. The Community Services Director, or his designee, is hereby
authorized to designate the listed site on the Edmonds zoning map with an “HR” designation.
This designation does not change or modify the underlying zone classification.
Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifi-
cally delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum, and shall take effect
five (5) days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the
title.
APPROVED:
MAYOR GARY HAAKENSON
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED:
CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY:
BY
W. SCOTT SNYDER
{kpl/00006.900000/} - 2 -
Packet Page 365 of 930
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: ________
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: ________
PUBLISHED: ________
EFFECTIVE DATE: ________
ORDINANCE NO. _____
{kpl/00006.900000/} - 3 -
Packet Page 366 of 930
{rwc/00006.900000/} - 4 -
SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. ____
of the City of Edmonds, Washington
On the 21st day of July, 2009, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed
Ordinance No. ____. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting of the title,
provides as follows:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DESIGNATING THE
EXTERIOR OF THE EDMONDS BANK AT 324 - 326 MAIN STREET, EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON FOR INCLUSION ON THE EDMONDS REGISTER OF HISTORIC
PLACES, DIRECTING THE COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR OR HIS DESIGNEE TO
DESIGNATE THE SITE ON THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP WITH AN “HR”
DESIGNATION, AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE.
The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request.
DATED this ___ day of December, 2009.
CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE
Packet Page 367 of 930
Packet Page 368 of 930
Packet Page 369 of 930
Packet Page 370 of 930
Packet Page 371 of 930
Packet Page 372 of 930
Packet Page 373 of 930
Packet Page 374 of 930
Packet Page 375 of 930
Packet Page 376 of 930
Packet Page 377 of 930
Packet Page 378 of 930
Packet Page 379 of 930
Packet Page 380 of 930
Packet Page 381 of 930
Historic Preservation Commission Minutes
May 14, 2009 Page 2
The Commission and staff discussed the best way to implement the historic overlay concept, including an effective public
involvement process. They noted the effectiveness of the public process that was used for the 4th Avenue Corridor Plan,
which involved a great citizen’s advisory group and a comprehensive plan for getting the word out.
Chair Eccleshal recommended the Commission start by preparing draft language to review at their next meeting. Ms. Chapin
could be invited to participate in the discussion to make sure the overlay would fit with the 4th Avenue Corridor Plan. Once
the language has been tweaked, it could be presented to the public for comment. The Commission discussed the idea of
inviting the 4th Avenue Corridor Citizens Advisory Committee to meet with the Commission to discuss the draft historic
overlay proposal, as well. Ms. Chapin cautioned the Commission that the 4th Avenue Corridor Plan deals only with public
right-of-way, and she spent a lot of time helping people understand that the plan would not place any restrictions on private
properties. Chair Eccleshall explained that the Commission is not asking Ms. Chapin to carry the historic overlay proposal
forward. However, it is apparent that the 4th Avenue property owners are interested in improving and protecting the
character of their street, so it would be helpful to start there.
Mr. Chave suggested that a group of Commissioners get together to prepare a memorandum to the Commission identifying
those properties along 4th Avenue that are included on the BOLA Survey, as well as those that are not on the survey but
contribute to the historic character of the street. The memorandum could also provide ideas for encouraging rehabilitation
and reuse of historic properties, etc. The Commission could review the memorandum at their June 11th meeting. The
Commission agreed to move forward as quickly as possible to prepare draft language to create a historic overlay for 4th
Avenue. Ms. Chapin suggested that when the 4th Avenue Corridor Plan is presented to the City Council in June, it would be
helpful if they were able to announce that the Historic Preservation Commission is putting together ideas and alternatives
related to historic preservation. Mr. Chave summarized that while the final draft overlay language does not need to be
available by the end of June, it would be helpful for the Commission to identify the various options they are exploring.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Application to Determine the Eligibility of the Edmonds Bank for Placement on the Edmonds Register of Historic
Places
Mr. Lien explained how the public hearing was noticed and announced there was no one in the audience to participate in the
hearing. He reminded the Commission that they previously nominated the Edmonds Bank property for consideration on the
Edmonds Register of Historic Places, and the City did receive consent from the property owners.
Mr. Lien specifically noted that once identified on the register, the property would be eligible for special tax valuation on
future rehabilitation projects. The Commission noted that if the property had been identified on the Register prior to being
remodeled three years ago, the owner could have saved some money. However, Mr. Waite was unable to persuade the
property owner to list the property on the register. The Commission agreed it would be interesting for Commissioner Waite
to figure out what the monetary benefit to the property owner would have been.
Mr. Lien reviewed that the property’s significant historic features are related primarily to the exterior of the building, which
is constructed out of pre-fabricated concrete blocks. He particularly noted the intricate blocks that were used on the ground
floor. He briefly described the changes that have occurred to the building over the years as noted in the staff report. He
advised that when the building was renovated in 2004, the designs were intended to make it look more like it did at the turn
of the century. He noted that the bank building is located to the east of the original Kingdon’s General Store (1910) and
Schumacher Building (1900). Across the street is the Beeson Building (1900). He summarized there are numerous historic
buildings on this block.
Mr. Lien reviewed how the property would meet the three required criteria to be listed on the Edmonds Register of Historic
Places as follows:
Significantly associated with the history, architecture, archaeology, engineering or cultural heritage of Edmonds.
This property is associated with early commercial development in Edmonds and was the site of the first bank in Edmonds.
Packet Page 382 of 930
Historic Preservation Commission Minutes
May 14, 2009 Page 3
Has integrity. The building retains its original massing and was renovated in 2004 to return the building close to its
original appearance of the early 20th century. Originally, the building featured prominent columns and a recessed entry,
which has been incorporated into the ground floor providing additional floor space. .
At least 50 years old or has exceptional important if less than 50 years old. The building was constructed in 1907 and
is more than 100 years old.
Mr. Lien explained that in addition to the above three criteria, the property must also meet one of the designation categories.
He reviewed that the property would fit into the following designation categories:
Associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of national, state or local
history. This is the location of the City’s first bank, the State Bank of Edmonds. .
Embodies the distinctive architectural characteristics of a type, period, style or method of design or construction.
The building is an example of traditional turn of the century commercial architecture.
Exemplifies or reflects special elements of the City’s history. Again, this building housed the first bank in Edmonds.
Mr. Lien concluded his presentation by recommending the Commission find the nomination meets the criteria for potential
designation on the Edmonds Register of Historic Places. In particular, the exterior of the structure contains significant
architectural features.
CHAIR ECCLESHAL MOVED THE COMMISSION FORWARD THE EDMONDS BANK BUILDING
NOMINATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL WITH A RECOMMENDATION THAT IT BE LISTED ON THE
EDMONDS REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES AS OUTLINED IN THE STAFF REPORT (EXTERIOR ONLY).
COMMISSIONER DEINER-KARR SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Commissioner Bauer recalled that the nomination process was supposed to include a site visit by a member of the
Commission. The Commission agreed they should make every effort to contact the owners of properties they are responsible
for nominating to clarify their questions and concerns about the process. Commissioners should be prepared to report on the
status of the properties on June 11th. Once a property has been included on the Register, the responsible Commissioner
should be present when the plaque is installed on the property.
The Commission discussed that the BOLA Report and the Museum are good resources for obtaining the detailed information
the application form requires. In addition, Chair Eccleshall advised that the book, EDMONDS, GEM OF THE PACIFIC
NORTHWEST, documents every change in ownership of buildings in Edmonds from 1880 to 1954 and is an exceptional
resource. The book is available at the Museum. It was noted that Google Images is another good source for information
about historic buildings.
Ms. Cunningham announced that the City Council’s public hearing on the Edmonds Bank Nomination has been rescheduled
to July 6th.
OTHER REPORTS
Application to Determine the Eligibility of the Olympic Hotel for Placement on the Edmonds Register of Historic
Places
Commissioner Bauer recalled that the Olympic Hotel is listed on both the State and National Registers and was previously
discussed by the Commission. Mr. Chave advised that because the property owners have already offered their consent to be
included on the Edmonds Register of Historic Places, the only thing left for the Commission to do is indicate exactly what
aspects of the property they are designating as historic.
COMMISSIONER BAUER MOVED THAT THE COMMISSION FORWARD THE OLYMPIC HOTEL SITE
NOMINATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL WITH THE RECOMMENDATION THAT IT (SITE ONLY) BE
LISTED ON THE EDMONDS REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES AS PER THE ORDINANCE.
COMMISSIONER DEINER-KARR SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Packet Page 383 of 930
City of Edmonds Historic Preservation Commission
Meeting Date: May 14, 2009
Agenda Subject: Application for designation of the Edmonds Bank as eligible for inclusion
in the Edmonds Register of Historic Places
Staff Lead: Kernen Lien, Associate Planner
Property Information
Site Name/Location: Edmonds Bank
326 Main St
Edmonds, WA 98020
Tax Account #: 00434401600502
Township 27 Range 03 Section 23 ¼ Sec SE ¼-¼ Sec
Construction date: 1907
Owner/Applicant Information
Person(s) Nominating Site: Edmonds Historic Preservation Commission
Property Owner: Hirshberg J/Koehler L/Hirshberg W Trustee
Report Summary
Staff recommendation: Staff recommends that the Commission finds that the
nomination meets the criteria for potential designation in the
Edmonds Register of Historic Places. The exterior of the
structure contains the significant architectural features.
Designation
Criteria
Meets
Criteria
Staff
Comments
1. Significantly associated with the
history, architecture, archaeology,
engineering or cultural heritage of
Edmonds…
The building is associated with the early
commercial development of Edmonds and
was originally constructed as the City’s
first bank.
City of Edmonds
Historic Preservation Commission
Designation Staff Report
Packet Page 384 of 930
Edmonds Bank HistPres designation staff report.doc Page 2
Designation
Criteria
Meets
Criteria
Staff
Comments
2. Has integrity… The building retains its original massing
and was renovated in 2004 to return the
building close to its original appearance
of the early 20th century. Originally, the
Edmonds Bank featured prominent
column and a recessed entry which has
since been incorporated into the ground
floor providing additional floor space.
3. Age at least 50 years old, or has
exceptional importance if less than 50
years old…
The structure is more than 100 years old.
4. Falls into at least one of the following
designation categories:
Designation Category
a. Associated with events that have
made a significant contribution to the
broad patterns of national, state or
local history.
The building is the site of the City of
Edmonds first bank, the State Bank of
Edmonds.
b. Embodies the distinctive architectural
characteristics of a type, period, style
or method of design or construction,
or represents a significant and
distinguishable entity whose
components may lack individual
distinction.
Traditional turn of the century
commercial architecture.
c. Is an outstanding work of a designer,
builder or architect who has made a
substantial contribution to the art.
d. Exemplifies or reflects special
elements of the City’s cultural, social,
economic, political, aesthetic,
engineering or architectural history.
Site of the City’s first bank.
e. Is associated with the lives of persons
significant in national, state or local
history.
f. Has yielded or may be likely to yield
important archaeological information
related to history or prehistory.
Packet Page 385 of 930
Edmonds Bank HistPres designation staff report.doc Page 3
Designation
Criteria
Meets
Criteria
Staff
Comments
g. Is a building or structure removed
from its original location but which is
significant primarily for architectural
value, or which is the only surviving
structure significantly associated with
a historic person or event.
h. Is a birthplace or grave of a historical
figure of outstanding importance and
is the only surviving structure or site
associated with that person.
i. Is a cemetery which derives its
primary significance from age, from
distinctive design features, or from
association with historic events or
cultural patterns.
j. Is a reconstructed building that has
been executed in a historically
accurate manner on the original site.
k. Is a creative and unique example of
folk architecture and design created
by persons not formally trained in the
architectural or design professions,
and which does not fit into formal
architectural or historical, the
designation shall include description
of the boundaries of categories.
Significant Features
1. Shape: Rectangular, two-story commercial building.
2. Roof and Roof
Features:
The building has a flat roof with a parapet wall.
Packet Page 386 of 930
Edmonds Bank HistPres designation staff report.doc Page 4
3. Openings
(entries, etc.):
There are two doors in the primary entry ways on the north side of the
building off of Main Street. One door opens into the retail store (Edmonds
Interior) located on the first floor. The second door opens to a stair case that
leads up to the offices on the second floor. Two secondary entrances also
existing, one in the southwest corner opening to the west, and another on the
south side of the building opening south. Two large store front display
windows exist at street level on the east and west sides of the primary entry
way. On the second floor, six double hung windows were installed during
the 2004 renovation, five on the north side and one on the east side of the
façade. Four more double hung windows exist on the east side of the
building in their original location. Four first floor window openings have
been filled in with concrete blocks at some point in the buildings history.
4. Projections: A rod-suspended flat roof canopy extends approximately seven feet over the
sidewalk on the north end of the building.
5. Trim & secondary
features
The 2004 renovation reinstalled the main cornice at its original location and
is composed of dentil blocks and coped molding with an added egg and dart
molding common to the period. The parapet cornice molding was also
reinstalled.
6. Materials: The front façade of the building is clad in painted and notched shiplap, or
“Dutch lap” wood siding. The building is constructed of prefabricated
concrete blocks.
7. Setting: The building is located on a block with, and connected to, structures of a
similar age. The building directly to the west was the site of the Kingdon’s
General Store and was constructed in 1910. Just west of Kingdon’s General
Store is the Schumacher Building (Chanterelle) which was constructed in
1900. William A. Schumacher constructed the building and was the
treasurer who founded the Bank of Edmonds. Across 4th Ave to the east is
the Beeson Building, which was constructed in 1909 and was also
nominated this year to be placed on the Edmonds Register of Historic
Places. All these buildings maintain much of their historic character and add
greatly to the ambiance of downtown Edmonds.
8. Materials at close
range
The first floor of east façade shows the original prefabricated concrete block
units which mimics ashlar stonework, while the second floor and parapet
blocks are horizontally scored. Smooth concrete blocks were used to infill
the original grade level windows.
9. Craft details: N/A
10. Individual
rooms/spaces:
The first floor has an open floor plan used for retail. The second floor has
been divided up into separate office spaces.
11. Related spaces or
sequences:
N/A
12. Interior features: N/A. Interior features are not considered for nomination
13. Surface finishes &
materials:
N/A
14. Exposed structure: N/A
Packet Page 387 of 930
Edmonds Bank HistPres designation staff report.doc Page 5
Packet Page 388 of 930
Edmonds Bank HistPres designation staff report.doc Page 6
View of North façade from 4th Ave N and Main St c. 1907 (Photo from Edmonds Historical Museum)
View of North façade from 4th Ave N and Main St c.1910 (Photo from Edmonds Historical Museum)
Packet Page 389 of 930
Edmonds Bank HistPres designation staff report.doc Page 7
View of North façade from 4th Ave N and Main St Prior to 2004 Renovation (Photo from Snohomish
County Website)
View of North façade from 4th Ave N and Main St Post 2004 Renovation
Packet Page 390 of 930
Edmonds Bank HistPres designation staff report.doc Page 8
View of North façade from Main St Post 2004 Renovation
Notes on historic register nominations:
Chapter 20.45.020 ECDC* states that if the Commission finds that the nominated property is eligible
for the Edmonds Register of Historic Places, the Commission shall make recommendation to the City
Council that the property be listed in the register with owner’s consent.
According to Chapter 20.45.040 ECDC, listing on the Edmonds Register of Historic Places is an
honorary designation denoting significant association with the historic, archaeological, engineering or
cultural heritage of the community. Properties are listed individually or as contributing properties to a
historic district. No property may be listed without the owner’s permission.
Prior to the commencement of any work on a register property, excluding ordinary repair and
maintenance and emergency measures defined in Section 20.45.000(H), the owner must request and
receive a Certificate of Appropriateness from the Commission for the proposed work. Violation of this
rule shall be grounds for the Commission to review the property for removal from the register.
Prior to whole or partial demolition of a register property, the owner must request and receive a waiver
of a Certificate of Appropriateness.
Because Edmonds is a Certified Local Government (CLG), all properties listed on the Edmonds
Register of Historic Places may be eligible for a special tax valuation on their rehabilitation.
* Edmonds Community Development Code
Packet Page 391 of 930
Ed
m
o
n
d
s
B
a
n
k
N
o
m
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
f
o
r
Ed
m
o
n
d
s
R
e
g
i
s
t
e
r
o
f
H
i
s
t
o
r
i
c
P
l
a
c
e
s
Pu
b
l
i
c
H
e
a
r
i
n
g
Ju
l
y
2
1
,
2
0
0
9
Ph
o
t
o
c
o
u
r
t
e
s
y
o
f
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
H
i
s
t
o
r
i
c
a
l
M
u
s
e
u
m
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
39
2
of
93
0
“E
d
m
o
n
d
s
B
a
n
k
”
32
4
–
3
2
6
M
a
i
n
S
t
r
e
e
t
•
N
o
m
i
n
a
t
e
d
f
o
r
co
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
f
o
r
pl
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
o
n
t
h
e
Ed
m
o
n
d
s
R
e
g
i
s
t
e
r
o
f
Hi
s
t
o
r
i
c
P
l
a
c
e
s
•
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
s
i
g
n
e
d
Au
t
h
o
r
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
f
o
r
m
2
N
D
A
V
E
N
4
T
H
A
V
E
N
5
T
H
A
V
E
N
3
R
D
A
V
E
N
B E L L S T
M A I N S T
6TH AVE N
D
A
Y
T
O
N
S
T
3
R
D
A
V
E
S
4
T
H
A
V
E
S
6TH AVE S
5
T
H
A
V
E
S
D S S T
3
R
D
A
V
E
S
4
T
H
A
V
E
S
Ph
o
t
o
f
r
o
m
2
0
0
4
B
O
L
A
S
u
r
v
e
y
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
39
3
of
93
0
Ef
f
e
c
t
s
o
f
l
i
s
t
i
n
g
o
n
t
h
e
r
e
g
i
s
t
e
r
•
H
o
n
o
r
a
r
y
d
e
s
i
g
n
a
t
i
o
n
d
e
n
o
t
i
n
g
s
i
g
n
i
f
i
c
a
n
t
as
s
o
c
i
a
t
i
o
n
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
h
i
s
t
o
r
y
o
f
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
•
P
r
i
o
r
t
o
c
o
m
m
e
n
c
i
n
g
a
n
y
w
o
r
k
o
n
a
re
g
i
s
t
e
r
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
(
e
x
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
r
e
p
a
i
r
a
n
d
ma
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
)
,
o
w
n
e
r
m
u
s
t
r
e
q
u
e
s
t
a
n
d
re
c
e
i
v
e
a
c
e
r
t
i
f
i
c
a
t
e
o
f
a
p
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
e
n
e
s
s
fr
o
m
t
h
e
H
i
s
t
o
r
i
c
P
r
e
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
•
M
a
y
b
e
e
l
i
g
i
b
l
e
f
o
r
s
p
e
c
i
a
l
t
a
x
v
a
l
u
a
t
i
o
n
o
n
th
e
i
r
r
e
h
a
b
i
l
i
t
a
t
i
o
n
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
39
4
of
93
0
Si
g
n
i
f
i
c
a
n
t
F
e
a
t
u
r
e
s
Ph
o
t
o
c
o
u
r
t
e
s
y
o
f
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
H
i
s
t
o
r
i
c
a
l
M
u
s
e
u
m
Ph
o
t
o
c
o
u
r
t
e
s
y
o
f
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
H
i
s
t
o
r
i
c
a
l
M
u
s
e
u
m
Ph
o
t
o
f
r
o
m
S
n
o
h
o
m
i
s
h
C
o
u
n
t
y
W
e
b
s
i
t
e
Ph
o
t
o
f
r
o
m
2
0
0
4
B
O
L
A
S
u
r
v
e
y
19
0
7
19
1
0
20
0
9
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
39
5
of
93
0
Se
t
t
i
n
g
4
T
H
A
V
E
N
5
T
H A V E N
3
R
D
A M A I N S T
D A Y T O N S T
3
R
D
A
V
E
S
4
T
H
A
V
E
S
5
T
H
A
V
E
S
S
19
3
8
19
5
7
Be
e
s
o
n
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
19
0
9
Le
s
l
i
e
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
19
6
3
Th
e
Y
o
s
t
G
a
r
a
g
e
19
0
0
Dr
.
H
a
l
l
H
o
u
s
e
19
1
0
19
4
0
Ro
s
c
o
e
H
o
u
s
e
19
1
0
Ed
m
o
n
d
'
s
B
a
n
k
19
0
7
Ed
m
o
n
d
s
B
a
p
t
i
s
t
C
h
u
r
c
h
19
0
9
Th
e
L
e
y
d
a
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
19
2
4
Sc
h
u
m
a
c
h
e
r
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
19
0
0
Be
c
k
l
u
n
d
/
M
c
G
i
b
b
o
n
H
o
u
s
e
19
0
1
Ki
n
g
d
o
n
'
s
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
S
t
o
r
e
/
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
V
a
r
i
e
t
y
19
1
0
19
1
0
Th
e
P
r
i
n
c
e
s
s
T
h
e
a
t
e
r
/
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
T
h
e
a
t
e
r
19
2
0
Be
e
s
o
n
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
-
1
9
0
9
Sc
h
u
m
a
c
h
e
r
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
-
1
9
0
0
Ki
n
g
d
o
n
’
s
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
S
t
o
r
e
-
1
9
1
0
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
39
6
of
93
0
De
s
i
g
n
a
t
i
o
n
C
r
i
t
e
r
i
a
•
S
i
g
n
i
f
i
c
a
n
t
l
y
a
s
s
o
c
i
a
t
e
d
wi
t
h
t
h
e
h
i
s
t
o
r
y
,
ar
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
e
,
a
r
c
h
a
e
o
l
o
g
y
,
en
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
o
r
c
u
l
t
u
r
a
l
he
r
i
t
a
g
e
o
f
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
•
H
a
s
i
n
t
e
g
r
i
t
y
•
A
t
l
e
a
s
t
5
0
y
e
a
r
s
o
l
d
,
o
r
ha
s
e
x
c
e
p
t
i
o
n
a
l
im
p
o
r
t
a
n
c
e
i
f
l
e
s
s
t
h
e
5
0
ye
a
r
s
o
l
d
•
F
a
l
l
s
i
n
t
o
a
t
l
e
a
s
t
o
n
e
o
f
de
s
i
g
n
a
t
i
o
n
c
a
t
e
g
o
r
i
e
s
,
EC
D
C
2
0
.
4
5
.
0
1
0
.
A
-
K
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
39
7
of
93
0
De
s
i
g
n
a
t
i
o
n
C
a
t
e
g
o
r
i
e
s
•
A
s
s
o
c
i
a
t
e
d
w
i
t
h
e
v
e
n
t
s
th
a
t
h
a
v
e
m
a
d
e
a
si
g
n
i
f
i
c
a
n
t
c
o
n
t
r
i
b
u
t
i
o
n
t
o
th
e
b
r
o
a
d
p
a
t
t
e
r
n
s
o
f
na
t
i
o
n
a
l
,
s
t
a
t
e
o
r
l
o
c
a
l
hi
s
t
o
r
y
.
•
E
m
b
o
d
i
e
s
t
h
e
d
i
s
t
i
n
c
t
i
v
e
ar
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
ch
a
r
a
c
t
e
r
i
s
t
i
c
s
o
f
a
t
y
p
e
,
pe
r
i
o
d
,
s
t
y
l
e
o
r
m
e
t
h
o
d
o
f
de
s
i
g
n
o
r
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
.
•
E
x
e
m
p
l
i
f
i
e
s
o
r
r
e
f
l
e
c
t
s
sp
e
c
i
a
l
e
l
e
m
e
n
t
s
o
f
t
h
e
Ci
t
y
’
s
h
i
s
t
o
r
y
.
Ph
o
t
o
c
o
u
r
t
e
s
y
o
f
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
H
i
s
t
o
r
i
c
a
l
M
u
s
e
u
m
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
39
8
of
93
0
Re
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
•
F
i
n
d
t
h
e
n
o
m
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
me
e
t
s
t
h
e
c
r
i
t
e
r
i
a
a
n
d
is
e
l
i
g
i
b
l
e
f
o
r
de
s
i
g
n
a
t
i
o
n
i
n
t
h
e
Ed
m
o
n
d
s
R
e
g
i
s
t
e
r
o
f
Hi
s
t
o
r
i
c
P
l
a
c
e
s
.
•
A
p
p
r
o
v
e
o
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
a
s
re
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
e
d
b
y
t
h
e
Ed
m
o
n
d
s
H
i
s
t
o
r
i
c
Pr
e
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
Co
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
39
9
of
93
0
AM-2409 6.
Creation of a New Mixed Use Zoning Classification for Firdale Village
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:07/21/2009
Submitted By:Rob Chave, Planning Time:30 Minutes
Department:Planning Type:Action
Review Committee:
Committee Action:
Information
Subject Title
Public hearing on the Planning Board recommendation to approve the creation of a new
mixed use zoning classification for Firdale Village to implement the Comprehensive Plan.
(File No. AMD-2008-10 / Applicant: Shapiro Architects)
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Direct the City Attorney to prepare an ordinance to implement the recommendation of Planning
Board to approve the new zoning classification.
Previous Council Action
The City Council adopted updated Comprehensive Plan guidance for the Firdale Village
neighborhood center in 2006.
Narrative
This is a public hearing on a proposal by A. D. Shapiro Architects, representing the owners of the
Firdale commercial center, to create a new mixed use zoning classification to implement the
direction of the Comprehensive Plan for the Firdale Village neighborhood center.
The proponents have developed a zoning classification and design guidelines proposal that could
be applied to the Firdale Neighborhood Commercial area to implement the Comprehensive Plan.
The City approved a comprehensive plan amendment providing a new direction for the Firdale
Neighborhood Commercial area, but has not yet followed up with implementing zoning changes.
If approved, the proponents would have to follow up by making an application for a specific
rezone proposal to actually change the zoning of the property in order to set the stage for a future
project. The proposal adds a new zoning classification to Chapter 16.
As a proposed code amendment, this is a legislative proposal which is at the discretion of the
Council to approve, modify, or deny. The Planning Board recommended that the Council approve
the proposed code change.
Exhibits:
1. Proposed Firdale Zoning & Design Standards, 4/22/2009
2. Planning Board Hearing Presentation, 4/22/2009
3. Draft Firdale Zoning & Design Standards, 2/27/2009
4. Draft Firdale Zoning & Design Standards, 12/5/2008
Packet Page 400 of 930
5. Planning Board Work Session presentation & material, 10/8/2008
6. Planning Board Work Session presentation & material, 8/8/2008
7. Sample applicant flyer for Firdale Village Neighborhood Meeting
8. Public Comment Received (note this was received after the PB hearing)
9. Planning Board minutes
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: 1. Proposed Firdale Zoning & Design Standards, 4/22/2009
Link: 2. Planning Board Hearing Presentation, 4/22/2009
Link: 3. Draft Firdale Zoning & Design Standards, 2/27/2009
Link: 4. Draft Firdale Zoning & Design Standards, 12/5/2008
Link: 5. Planning Board Work Session presentation & material, 10/8/2008
Link: 6. Planning Board Work Session material, 8/8/2008
Link: 7. Sample applicant flyer for Firdale Village Neighborhood Meeting
Link: 8. Public Comments Received
Link: 9. Planning Board Minutes
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 07/17/2009 08:26 AM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 07/17/2009 08:51 AM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 07/17/2009 08:56 AM APRV
Form Started By: Rob
Chave
Started On: 07/16/2009 03:12
PM
Final Approval Date: 07/17/2009
Packet Page 401 of 930
Firdale Village Rezone
Firdale Avenue, Edmonds, WA
Zoning Criteria
Table of Contents
1. Zoning Criteria Language
2. Figures
a. Vicinity Map
b. District Map
c. Roof Shape Diagrams
d. Existing Tree Retention Diagram
3. Supplemental Information
21705 Highway 99, Suite 2, Lynnwood, WA 98036 425.778.5400 FAX.778.7096
Packet Page 402 of 930
1
Firdale Village Site -- Design Standards
A.D. Shapiro Architects / DRAFT 12-10-08
Firdale Village
Mixed Use Zoning Criteria
Draft 02-26-2008
16.100.000 Introduction
16.100.010 Purposes
16.100.020 Sub-Districts
16.100.030 Uses
16.100.040 Site Development Standards
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
16.100.000 Introduction
General Intent and Project Vision
The design vision for Firdale Village is to create a vibrant neighborhood
village form of development that strikes a balance between commercial, retail
and residential uses and contributes to the vitality of the neighborhood and
area. The project is intended to support a variety of commercial and retail
uses along with multi-family residential in an environment that is accessible to
the pedestrian, visitor, tenant, motorist and public transit user.
16.100.010 Purposes
The Firdale Village Mixed-Use zone has the following specific purposes in
addition to the general purposes for business and commercial zones in
Chapter 16.40 ECDC.
A. To reserve and regulate areas for a ‘neighborhood center’ type of
mixed-use development that includes a mix of commercial and multi-
residential housing types, and a range of greater densities than are available in
the single family residential zone;
B. To promote a mix of residential, commercial and other uses in a
manner that is consistent with the City’s comprehensive plan,
C. To provide for those additional uses which complement and are
compatible with multiple residential uses.
D. The Codes contained within this Chapter are to be used in conjunction
with the Firdale Village Design Standards in Chapter 22.100.000 ECDC.
Packet Page 403 of 930
2
Firdale Village Site -- Design Standards
A.D. Shapiro Architects / DRAFT 12-10-08
16.100.020 Sub-Districts
See Figure B for location of Districts on the site.
A. District 1 – Commercial: The primarily commercial uses will be
located in this district, which is located closer to Firdale Avenue and oriented
to the street. The flexibility for each is written into the table, but not called
out in the “mini-description”.
B. District 2 – Commercial/Multi-Family Residential: Multi-family
residential uses will be located more towards sides and rear of the site, behind
the commercial uses, with possible commercial functions on the ground level.
16.100.030 Uses
A. Table 16.100.030-1
Permitted Uses
Dist 1
Com-
mercial
Dist 2
Multi-
Family
Residential Uses
Single-family dwelling X X
Multiple dwelling unit(s) A A
Housing for low-income elderly and senior housing A A
Commercial Uses
Retail stores or sales A A
Offices A A
Service uses including professional service offices A A
Dist 1
Com
Dist 2
MF
Retail uses allowed regardless of size include grocery stores, pharmacy/
drug stores and bookstores. A E
Retail sales requiring intensive outdoor display or storage areas, such as
trailer sales, used car lots (except as part of a new car sales and service
dealer), and heavy equipment storage, sales or services X X
Restaurants (excluding drive-through) A A
Dist 1
Com
Dist 2
MF
Packet Page 404 of 930
3
Firdale Village Site -- Design Standards
A.D. Shapiro Architects / DRAFT 12-10-08
Pubs, taverns or bars A X
Enclosed fabrication or assembly areas associated with and on the same
property as an art studio, art gallery, shoe repair, restaurant or food
service establishment that also provides an on-site retail outlet open to
the public A E
Automobile sales and service X X
Dry cleaning and laundry plants which use only nonflammable and non-
explosive cleaning agents C E
Printing, publishing and binding establishments C C
Community-oriented open air markets conducted as an outdoor
operation and licensed pursuant to provisions in the Edmonds City Code A A
Bus stop shelters A X
Churches, subject to the requirements of ECDC 17.100.020 A E
Local public facilities subject to the requirements of ECDC 17.100.050 C C
Off-street parking and loading areas to serve a permitted use B B
Commuter parking lots in conjunction with a facility otherwise
permitted in this zone B B
Commercial parking lots A C
Wholesale uses X X
Hotels and motels A A
Amusement establishments C X
Auction businesses, excluding vehicle or livestock auctions X X
Drive-in businesses X X
Laboratories X X
Fabrication of light industrial products not otherwise listed as a
permitted use X X
Day-care centers C C
Hospitals, health clinics, convalescent homes, rest homes, sanitariums A A
Museums and art galleries of primarily local concern that do not meet
the criteria for regional public facilities as defined in ECDC 21.85.033 A E
Dist 1
Com
Dist 2
MF
Large retail stores (larger than 20,000 GSF), excluding drug stores, X X
Packet Page 405 of 930
4
Firdale Village Site -- Design Standards
A.D. Shapiro Architects / DRAFT 12-10-08
pharmacies, grocery stores and bookstores.
Residential treatment facilities for alcoholics and drug abusers X X
Light Industrial X X
Outdoor storage, incidental to a permitted use D D
A = Permitted primary use
B = Permitted secondary use
C = Primary uses requiring a conditional use permit
D = Secondary uses requiring a conditional use permit
E = Permitted primary use on ground level floor only
X = Not permitted
16.100.040 Development Standards
A. Development Standards – General
Development Requirements can be summarized as follows:
See District Map figure B
B. Building Scale and Building Height
1. Intent: To provide a consistency of architectural scale for different
sections of the development:
The more commercial/retail area closer to Firdale Avenue shall be
lower in scale than the multi-family buildings oriented to the rear
of the site.
Building Height:
a. District 1: Commercial/Office/Retail:
One (1) – three (3) stories.
Minimum height: 20 feet; Maximum height 39 feet.
b. District 2: Multi-family Residential:
Maximum -- 4 stories, with conditions. (See Note b.(1) below.
Maximum height: 48 feet base height, for four stories,
with possibility of an additional 4 feet, (to allow for
variation in rooflines – See Note b (2) below)
Packet Page 406 of 930
5
Firdale Village Site -- Design Standards
A.D. Shapiro Architects / DRAFT 12-10-08
(1) A fourth story will be allowed in District 2, for multi-
family uses, providing that the project is set up from the outset
to integrate green design methods and technologies throughout
the project. The project must achieve at least a 4-star level of
the Built Green of Washington program or a LEED gold
certification. See also ECDC Design Standards 22.100.090.
(2) Roof only may extend four feet above the 48 foot
height limit if all portions of the roof above the stated height
are modulated in design and are designed as a hip, gable, arch,
shed or other similar roof forms. Vertical parapet walls are not
allowed to protrude above the 48 foot height limit unless they
are part of an approved modulated design. For examples of
permissible forms, see figures C1, C2, C3, C3, and C4.
3. Elevator shaft and/or /Stairway penthouse shafts may extend above
this maximum up to ten feet (10’) above the roof.
4. Mechanical equipment may extend above this maximum up to
five feet (5’) above the roof.
C. Parking Standards
1. Minimum Spaces Required
a. Retail/Commercial including office and restaurant uses:
Minimum: Provide one space for every 400 SF.
A certain portion of parking places designated for office space
must also be shared with multi-family residential uses, and are
easily accessible to multi-family residential units.
b. Multi-Family Uses:
Minimum: Provide 1.5 spaces per unit.
Additional parking for residential units would be provided in a
shared parking area for office/commercial and residential.
c. For Guest Parking, provide 1 space for every ten (10) units or
0.10 spaces for every unit as a minimum.
2. For shared parking arrangements, a legal agreement describing
terms of the shared parking arrangement shall be required between
the property management companies/owners of the residential and
commercial uses describing the joint use of the parking areas, and
will require approval by the planning jurisdiction.
Packet Page 407 of 930
6
Firdale Village Site -- Design Standards
A.D. Shapiro Architects / DRAFT 12-10-08
D. Site Setbacks/Buffers
See Diagram 16.100.040 D-1 below for illustration of
setbacks, buffers and related notes.
1. Minimum side setbacks are 15 feet.
2. The minimum setback on the northern boundary of the site
is 20 feet. This buffer includes protection of the existing evergreen
trees which will help to serve as a buffer between the development
and adjacent residential uses.
Note: Setback distances refer to areas above ground.
Underground structures can be within the above grade building
setback area as long as adequate soil depth is provided to support
the existence of tree and vegetation, with the exception of the north
property line which contain existing established fir trees.
3. Where the proposed development abuts a single-family residential
(RS) zoned property, in addition to complying with subsection (a)
of this footnote, the proposed development shall modulate the
design of any building facades facing the single-family
residentially (RS) zoned property. See Design Standards for
additional information.
4. SW Corner Setbacks: District 1 shall extend to street PL with no
setback, and setback from the west PL by 15’. District 2 shall be
setback on a per floor basis, with the second floor setback from the
street PL by 30’, and west PL by 35’. Third floor setback shall be
55’ from the street PL and 35’ from the west PL. All floors shall
be revert to minimum setback from the west PL of 15’ when 80’
from the street PL and greater.
E. Tree Retention and Buffer on North Boundary
See Diagram 16.100.040 ___________
The project site plan shall retain the existing stand of evergreen trees at
the north end of the site, to help serve as a buffer between the new
buildings and the residential parcels bordering the project.
The buffer area (setback) on the north boundary of the site shall not be
less than 20’ feet in the area designated as buffer with trees, see figures
B, & D.
Packet Page 408 of 930
7
Firdale Village Site -- Design Standards
A.D. Shapiro Architects / DRAFT 12-10-08
F. Open Space
1. Design Intent: The project shall include a comprehensive open
space network that uses courtyard(s) and other open space
elements to connect the residential and commercial uses.
2. Open Space Requirements:
Minimum open space requirement for the development:
20% of the site area. For this calculation the site area basis will
exclude those portions of the site dedicated to side and rear yard
setbacks.
The minimum open space requirement may include all developed
pedestrian areas including landscaped walkways, plazas,
courtyards and other passive open spaces in the commercial area.
The calculation may also include public open space for the
residential uses. The calculation shall not include parking areas,
driveways, service areas, setbacks or other buffer areas. Should the
calculation include open space for use by individual private
residential units, (such as decks), the percent of open space shall be
increased to 25%.
G. Design Standards
For more descriptive information on Design Standards and guidelines,
please see ECDC Chapter 22.100.
Packet Page 409 of 930
Fi
g
u
r
e
A
Vi
c
i
n
i
t
y
M
a
p
FI
R
D
A
L
E
V
I
L
L
A
G
E
N.
2
0
5
t
h
A
V
E
N
U
E
S
T
.
AU
R
O
R
A
V
I
L
L
A
G
E
FI
R
D
A
L
E
A
V
E
N
U
E
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
41
0
of
93
0
Packet Page 411 of 930
F
i
g
u
r
e
C
R
o
o
f
D
i
a
g
r
a
m
s
F
i
g
u
r
e
C
1
F
i
g
u
r
e
C
2
P
a
c
k
e
t
P
a
g
e
4
1
2
o
f
9
3
0
F
i
g
u
r
e
C
4
F
i
g
u
r
e
C
R
o
o
f
D
i
a
g
r
a
m
s
F
i
g
u
r
e
C
3
P
a
c
k
e
t
P
a
g
e
4
1
3
o
f
9
3
0
Fi
g
u
r
e
D
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
T
r
e
e
R
e
t
e
n
t
i
o
n
D
i
a
g
r
a
m
FI
R
D
A
L
E
A
V
E
N
U
E
EX
I
S
T
I
N
G
T
R
E
E
S
A
T
N
O
R
T
H
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
Y
L
I
N
E
,
G
R
E
E
N
ZO
N
E
O
N
G
R
O
U
N
D
EX
I
S
T
I
N
G
H
O
U
S
E
S
O
N
A
D
J
A
C
E
N
T
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
I
E
S
EX
I
S
T
I
N
G
B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G
S
A
T
F
I
R
D
A
L
E
V
I
L
L
A
G
E
T
O
BE
R
E
M
O
V
E
D
TR
E
E
S
O
U
T
S
I
D
E
O
F
S
E
T
B
A
C
K
(
S
)
S
U
B
J
E
C
T
T
O
RE
M
O
V
A
L
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
41
4
of
93
0
21705 Highway 99, Suite 2, Lynnwood, WA 98036 425.778.5400 FAX.778.7096
Packet Page 415 of 930
1
A.D. Shapiro Architects, PS
Packet Page 416 of 930
2
A.D. Shapiro Architects, PS
B . Goals and Intent
Packet Page 417 of 930
3
A.D. Shapiro Architects, PS
A. Intent
Packet Page 418 of 930
4
A.D. Shapiro Architects, PS
Packet Page 419 of 930
5
A.D. Shapiro Architects, PS
Packet Page 420 of 930
6
A.D. Shapiro Architects, PS
.
Packet Page 421 of 930
7
A.D. Shapiro Architects, PS
Packet Page 422 of 930
8
A.D. Shapiro Architects, PS
Packet Page 423 of 930
9
A.D. Shapiro Architects, PS
Packet Page 424 of 930
10
A.D. Shapiro Architects, PS
Packet Page 425 of 930
11
A.D. Shapiro Architects, PS
Packet Page 426 of 930
12
A.D. Shapiro Architects, PS
Packet Page 427 of 930
13
A.D. Shapiro Architects, PS
Packet Page 428 of 930
14
A.D. Shapiro Architects, PS
Packet Page 429 of 930
15
A.D. Shapiro Architects, PS
Packet Page 430 of 930
16
A.D. Shapiro Architects, PS
Packet Page 431 of 930
17
A.D. Shapiro Architects, PS
l
.
.
Packet Page 432 of 930
18
A.D. Shapiro Architects, PS
Packet Page 433 of 930
19
A.D. Shapiro Architects, PS
Packet Page 434 of 930
20
A.D. Shapiro Architects, PS
Packet Page 435 of 930
21
A.D. Shapiro Architects, PS
Packet Page 436 of 930
22
A.D. Shapiro Architects, PS
Packet Page 437 of 930
23
A.D. Shapiro Architects, PS
Packet Page 438 of 930
24
A.D. Shapiro Architects, PS
Packet Page 439 of 930
25
A.D. Shapiro Architects, PS
Packet Page 440 of 930
26
A.D. Shapiro Architects, PS
Packet Page 441 of 930
27
A.D. Shapiro Architects, PS
Packet Page 442 of 930
28
A.D. Shapiro Architects, PS
Utilization of water efficient fixtures throughout the project.
Packet Page 443 of 930
29
A.D. Shapiro Architects, PS
.
Packet Page 444 of 930
30
A.D. Shapiro Architects, PS
Packet Page 445 of 930
31
A.D. Shapiro Architects, PS
Packet Page 446 of 930
Fi
r
d
a
l
e
V
i
l
l
a
g
e
Re
z
o
n
e
C
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
A.
D
.
S
h
a
p
i
r
o
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
s
,
P
S
Pl
a
n
n
i
n
g
B
o
a
r
d
P
u
b
l
i
c
H
e
a
r
i
n
g
Ap
r
i
l
2
2
,
2
0
0
9
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
44
7
of
93
0
Ae
r
i
a
l
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
44
8
of
93
0
Co
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
44
9
of
93
0
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
Z
o
n
i
n
g
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
45
0
of
93
0
Fi
r
d
a
l
e
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
D.
6
.
b
.
F
i
r
d
a
l
e
V
i
l
l
a
g
e
D.
6
.
b
.
i
.
I
n
t
h
e
F
i
r
d
a
l
e
V
i
l
l
a
g
e
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
a
r
e
a
,
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
s
h
o
u
l
d
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
a
n
at
t
r
a
c
t
i
v
e
m
i
x
o
f
u
s
e
s
t
h
a
t
c
r
e
a
t
e
a
“n
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
v
i
l
l
a
g
e
”
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
-
o
r
i
e
n
t
e
d
en
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
.
C
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
s
p
a
c
e
s
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
o
r
i
e
n
t
e
d
t
o
w
a
r
d
t
h
e
s
t
r
e
e
t
i
n
o
r
d
e
r
to
m
a
x
i
m
i
z
e
v
i
s
i
b
i
l
i
t
y
,
a
n
d
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
s
h
o
u
l
d
b
e
p
r
i
m
a
r
i
l
y
a
c
c
o
m
m
o
d
a
t
e
d
e
i
t
h
e
r
be
h
i
n
d
o
r
u
n
d
e
r
n
e
a
t
h
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
s
.
D.
6
.
b
.
i
i
.
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
s
h
a
l
l
n
o
t
b
e
m
o
r
e
t
h
a
n
f
o
u
r
s
t
o
r
i
e
s
i
n
h
e
i
g
h
t
,
a
n
d
t
h
e
de
s
i
g
n
s
h
o
u
l
d
f
o
c
u
s
o
n
b
r
e
a
k
i
n
g
u
p
t
h
e
m
a
s
s
a
n
d
b
u
l
k
o
f
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
b
y
in
c
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
i
n
g
s
u
c
h
f
e
a
t
u
r
e
s
a
s
s
e
t
b
a
c
k
s
,
v
a
r
y
i
n
g
r
o
o
f
l
i
n
e
s
,
a
n
d
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
i
n
g
in
t
o
t
h
e
d
e
s
i
g
n
o
f
t
h
e
s
i
t
e
.
T
h
e
m
i
x
of
u
s
e
s
s
h
o
u
l
d
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
n
o
t
l
e
s
s
t
h
a
n
o
n
e
qu
a
r
t
e
r
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
s
p
a
c
e
.
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
45
1
of
93
0
Ne
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
V
i
l
l
a
g
e
D
e
s
i
g
n
Mi
x
e
d
-
U
s
e
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
T
y
p
e
s
--
G
r
o
u
n
d
F
l
o
o
r
R
e
t
a
i
l
wi
t
h
C
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
,
o
f
f
i
c
e
o
r
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
a
b
o
v
e
--
R
e
t
a
i
l
u
s
e
s
c
l
o
s
e
r
t
o
p
r
i
m
a
r
y
s
t
r
e
e
t
--
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
b
e
l
o
w
,
o
r
b
e
h
i
n
d
r
e
t
a
i
l
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
45
2
of
93
0
Ae
r
i
a
l
l
o
o
k
i
n
g
N
o
r
t
h
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
45
3
of
93
0
Ae
r
i
a
l
l
o
o
k
i
n
g
N
o
r
t
h
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
45
4
of
93
0
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
S
i
t
e
–
Tr
e
e
s
a
s
b
u
f
f
e
r
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
a
n
d
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
45
5
of
93
0
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
T
r
e
e
Re
t
e
n
t
i
o
n
D
i
a
g
r
a
m
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
45
6
of
93
0
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
S
i
t
e
–
Tr
e
e
s
a
s
b
u
f
f
e
r
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
a
n
d
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
45
7
of
93
0
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
45
8
of
93
0
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
T
r
e
e
Re
t
e
n
t
i
o
n
D
i
a
g
r
a
m
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
45
9
of
93
0
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
S
i
t
e
S
u
r
v
e
y
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
46
0
of
93
0
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
Z
o
n
e
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
s
Si
d
e
s
e
t
b
a
c
k
s
:
No
r
t
h
–
2
0
’
,
(
t
r
e
e
r
e
t
e
n
t
i
o
n
)
Ea
s
t
&
W
e
s
t
–
1
5
’
So
u
t
h
–
0
’
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
46
1
of
93
0
Pl
a
n
v
i
e
w
c
o
n
c
e
p
t
u
a
l
si
t
e
s
t
u
d
y
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
46
2
of
93
0
Vi
e
w
f
r
o
m
F
i
r
d
a
l
e
A
v
e
n
u
e
l
o
o
k
i
n
g
No
r
t
h
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
46
3
of
93
0
Vi
e
w
l
o
o
k
i
n
g
N
E
o
f
c
o
n
c
e
p
t
u
a
l
si
t
e
s
t
u
d
y
f
r
o
m
F
i
r
d
a
l
e
A
v
e
n
u
e
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
46
4
of
93
0
Vi
e
w
l
o
o
k
i
n
g
N
E
o
f
c
o
n
c
e
p
t
u
a
l
si
t
e
s
t
u
d
y
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
46
5
of
93
0
Zo
n
i
n
g
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
s
Di
s
t
r
i
c
t
1
:
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
lo
w
e
r
h
e
i
g
h
t
z
o
n
e
Di
s
t
r
i
c
t
2
:
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
ab
o
v
e
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
h
i
g
h
e
r
zo
n
e
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
46
6
of
93
0
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
46
7
of
93
0
De
s
i
g
n
S
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
s
Ap
p
l
i
c
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
a
n
d
G
o
a
l
s
Si
t
e
D
e
s
i
g
n
a
n
d
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
Ar
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
D
e
s
i
g
n
Pe
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
O
r
i
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
,
O
u
t
d
o
o
r
S
p
a
c
e
s
&
A
m
e
n
i
t
i
e
s
Ve
h
i
c
u
l
a
r
A
c
c
e
s
s
a
n
d
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
Si
t
e
L
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
i
n
g
&
S
c
r
e
e
n
i
n
g
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
s
Si
g
n
a
g
e
Si
t
e
L
i
g
h
t
i
n
g
Sa
f
e
t
y
I
s
s
u
e
s
Su
s
t
a
i
n
a
b
l
e
D
e
s
i
g
n
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
46
8
of
93
0
Si
t
e
D
e
s
i
g
n
a
n
d
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
So
l
a
r
o
r
i
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
,
t
o
p
o
g
r
a
p
h
y
,
ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
t
r
e
e
s
Pe
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
O
r
i
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
Op
e
n
s
p
a
c
e
,
(
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
co
u
r
t
y
a
r
d
s
a
n
d
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
se
a
t
i
n
g
a
r
e
a
s
)
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
46
9
of
93
0
Ar
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
D
e
s
i
g
n
/
C
h
a
r
a
c
t
e
r
Un
i
f
i
e
d
N
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
f
o
r
m
En
l
i
v
e
n
s
t
r
e
e
t
e
d
g
e
Gr
o
u
n
d
f
l
o
o
r
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
Bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
a
r
t
i
c
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
47
0
of
93
0
Bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
F
a
c
a
d
e
s
Vi
s
u
a
l
i
n
t
e
r
e
s
t
Re
c
e
s
s
e
d
e
n
t
r
a
n
c
e
s
Ca
n
o
p
i
e
s
Gr
o
u
n
d
f
l
o
o
r
w
i
n
d
o
w
s
an
d
d
o
o
r
s
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
47
1
of
93
0
Pe
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
O
r
i
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
,
O
u
t
d
o
o
r
S
p
a
c
e
s
&
A
m
e
n
i
t
i
e
s
Pe
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
L
i
n
k
s
w
i
t
h
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
47
2
of
93
0
Pe
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
O
r
i
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
,
O
u
t
d
o
o
r
S
p
a
c
e
s
&
A
m
e
n
i
t
i
e
s
Pe
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
A
m
e
n
i
t
i
e
s
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
47
3
of
93
0
Pe
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
O
r
i
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
,
O
u
t
d
o
o
r
S
p
a
c
e
s
&
A
m
e
n
i
t
i
e
s
Ou
t
d
o
o
r
C
o
u
r
t
y
a
r
d
s
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
47
4
of
93
0
Ve
h
i
c
u
l
a
r
A
c
c
e
s
s
&
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
Pa
r
k
i
n
g
t
o
s
i
d
e
&
r
e
a
r
o
f
pr
o
j
e
c
t
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
47
5
of
93
0
Ve
h
i
c
u
l
a
r
A
c
c
e
s
s
&
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
Sh
a
r
e
d
a
c
c
e
s
s
d
r
i
v
e
s
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
47
6
of
93
0
Ve
h
i
c
u
l
a
r
A
c
c
e
s
s
&
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
Sc
r
e
e
n
o
n
s
i
t
e
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
ar
e
a
s
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
47
7
of
93
0
Si
g
n
a
g
e
Si
g
n
a
g
e
t
o
i
n
t
e
g
r
a
t
e
w
i
t
h
ar
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
e
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
47
8
of
93
0
Si
t
e
L
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
i
n
g
&
S
c
r
e
e
n
i
n
g
Tr
e
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
t
o
ma
x
i
m
i
z
e
s
u
n
t
o
o
p
e
n
sp
a
c
e
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
47
9
of
93
0
Si
t
e
L
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
i
n
g
&
S
c
r
e
e
n
i
n
g
Us
e
o
f
b
r
i
c
k
/
p
a
t
t
e
r
n
s
i
n
pa
v
i
n
g
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
48
0
of
93
0
Si
t
e
L
i
g
h
t
i
n
g
In
t
e
g
r
a
t
e
d
f
i
x
t
u
r
e
s
w
i
t
h
ar
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
e
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
48
1
of
93
0
Si
t
e
L
i
g
h
t
i
n
g
Pe
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
s
c
a
l
e
Sa
f
e
t
y
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
48
2
of
93
0
Su
s
t
a
i
n
a
b
l
e
D
e
s
i
g
n
Me
e
t
B
u
i
l
t
G
r
e
e
n
/
L
E
E
D
St
a
n
d
a
r
d
s
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
48
3
of
93
0
Su
s
t
a
i
n
a
b
l
e
D
e
s
i
g
n
Lo
w
i
m
p
a
c
t
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
48
4
of
93
0
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
48
5
of
93
0
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
48
6
of
93
0
Fi
n
a
l
s
l
i
d
e
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
48
7
of
93
0
Ro
o
f
D
i
a
g
r
a
m
s
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
48
8
of
93
0
La
n
d
s
c
a
p
i
n
g
In
c
l
u
d
e
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
i
n
g
a
s
p
r
i
m
a
r
y
de
s
i
g
n
e
l
e
m
e
n
t
De
s
i
g
n
o
u
t
d
o
o
r
c
o
u
r
t
y
a
r
d
s
p
a
c
e
s
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
48
9
of
93
0
Us
e
o
f
D
e
c
o
r
a
t
i
v
e
S
t
r
e
e
t
F
u
r
n
i
t
u
r
e
,
A
r
t
w
o
r
k
,
L
i
g
h
t
i
n
g
--
Si
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
t
h
a
t
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
c
o
n
t
i
n
u
o
u
s
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
o
n
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
o
u
t
--
U
s
e
o
f
S
t
r
e
e
t
F
u
r
n
i
t
u
r
e
–
b
e
n
c
h
e
s
,
s
t
r
e
e
t
l
i
g
h
t
s
,
b
a
n
n
e
r
s
--
S
a
f
e
a
n
d
a
t
t
r
a
c
t
i
v
e
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
,
c
o
u
r
t
y
a
r
d
a
n
d
o
u
t
d
o
o
r
s
p
a
c
e
s
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
49
0
of
93
0
Bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
S
i
g
n
a
g
e
Building Signage Appropriate scale and placement
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
49
1
of
93
0
Bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
S
i
g
n
a
g
e
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
49
2
of
93
0
Ar
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
/
O
u
t
d
o
o
r
L
i
g
h
t
i
n
g
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
49
3
of
93
0
Tr
a
n
s
i
t
C
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
--
I
n
c
l
u
d
e
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
o
n
t
o
a
m
a
j
o
r
t
r
a
n
s
i
t
o
r
b
u
s
s
t
o
p
.
--
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
s
t
o
p
s
h
o
u
l
d
b
e
a
t
t
r
a
c
t
i
v
e
a
n
d
i
n
c
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
e
e
l
e
m
e
n
t
s
of
c
o
m
f
o
r
t
a
n
d
s
a
f
e
t
y
.
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
49
4
of
93
0
Su
s
t
a
i
n
a
b
l
e
D
e
s
i
g
n
I
s
s
u
e
s
--
In
c
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
e
G
r
e
e
n
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
a
n
d
S
u
s
t
a
i
n
a
b
l
e
D
e
s
i
g
n
Pr
i
n
c
i
p
l
e
s
a
n
d
S
t
r
a
t
e
g
i
e
s
w
h
e
r
e
p
o
s
s
i
b
l
e
--
U
t
i
l
i
z
e
r
a
t
i
n
g
s
y
s
t
e
m
s
u
c
h
a
s
B
u
i
l
t
G
r
e
e
n
C
e
r
t
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
fo
r
M
u
l
t
i
-
F
a
m
i
l
y
--
U
s
e
L
o
w
I
m
p
a
c
t
D
e
s
i
g
n
--
P
r
o
m
o
t
e
E
n
e
r
g
y
E
f
f
i
c
i
e
n
c
y
--
U
s
e
r
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
e
f
f
i
c
i
e
n
t
m
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
s
--
D
e
s
i
g
n
f
o
r
w
a
t
e
r
e
f
f
i
c
i
e
n
c
y
--
M
i
n
i
m
i
z
e
w
a
s
t
e
i
n
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
49
5
of
93
0
Li
v
e
w
o
r
k
o
p
t
i
o
n
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
49
6
of
93
0
--
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
f
r
i
e
n
d
l
y
s
t
r
e
e
t
d
e
s
i
g
n
a
n
d
o
u
t
d
o
o
r
s
p
a
c
e
s
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
49
7
of
93
0
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
49
8
of
93
0
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
49
9
of
93
0
Mi
x
e
d
-
U
s
e
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
-
-
E
x
a
m
p
l
e
s
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
50
0
of
93
0
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
50
1
of
93
0
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
50
2
of
93
0
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
50
3
of
93
0
Ne
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
Vi
l
l
a
g
e
D
e
s
i
g
n
Pe
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
-
F
r
i
e
n
d
l
y
D
e
s
i
g
n
--
S
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
t
h
a
t
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
c
o
n
t
i
n
u
o
u
s
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
o
n
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
o
u
t
--
U
s
e
o
f
S
t
r
e
e
t
F
u
r
n
i
t
u
r
e
–
Pe
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
s
c
a
l
e
b
e
n
c
h
e
s
,
s
t
r
e
e
t
l
i
g
h
t
s
,
b
a
n
n
e
r
a
r
m
s
--
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
D
e
s
i
g
n
s
t
h
a
t
e
m
p
h
a
s
i
s
s
a
f
e
a
n
d
a
t
t
r
a
c
t
i
v
e
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
,
co
u
r
t
y
a
r
d
a
n
d
o
u
t
d
o
o
r
s
p
a
c
e
s
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
50
4
of
93
0
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
50
5
of
93
0
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
50
6
of
93
0
--
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
f
r
i
e
n
d
l
y
s
t
r
e
e
t
d
e
s
i
g
n
a
n
d
o
u
t
d
o
o
r
s
p
a
c
e
s
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
50
7
of
93
0
Pr
i
n
c
i
p
l
e
s
o
f
Ne
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
Vi
l
l
a
g
e
D
e
s
i
g
n
8.
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
-
F
r
i
e
n
d
l
y
D
e
s
i
g
n
--
S
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
t
h
a
t
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
c
o
n
t
in
u
o
u
s
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
o
n
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
o
u
t
--
U
s
e
o
f
S
t
r
e
e
t
F
u
r
n
i
t
u
r
e
–
Pe
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
s
c
a
l
e
b
e
n
c
h
e
s
,
s
t
r
e
e
t
l
i
g
h
t
s
,
b
a
n
n
e
r
a
r
m
s
--
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
D
e
s
i
g
n
s
t
h
a
t
e
m
p
h
a
s
i
s
s
a
f
e
a
n
d
a
t
t
r
a
c
t
i
v
e
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
,
co
u
r
t
y
a
r
d
a
n
d
o
u
t
d
o
o
r
s
p
a
c
e
s
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
50
8
of
93
0
Pr
i
n
c
i
p
l
e
s
of
Ne
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
Vi
l
l
a
g
e
De
s
i
g
n
3.
M
i
x
o
f
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
a
n
d
L
a
n
d
U
s
e
s
a
n
d
D
i
v
e
r
s
i
t
y
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
50
9
of
93
0
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
51
0
of
93
0
Ne
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
Vi
l
l
a
g
e
D
e
s
i
g
n
Pe
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
-
F
r
i
e
n
d
l
y
D
e
s
i
g
n
--
S
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
t
h
a
t
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
c
o
n
t
i
n
u
o
u
s
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
o
n
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
o
u
t
--
U
s
e
o
f
S
t
r
e
e
t
F
u
r
n
i
t
u
r
e
–
b
e
n
c
h
e
s
,
s
t
r
e
e
t
l
i
g
h
t
s
,
b
a
n
n
e
r
s
--
S
a
f
e
a
n
d
a
t
t
r
a
c
t
i
v
e
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
,
c
o
u
r
t
y
a
r
d
a
n
d
o
u
t
d
o
o
r
s
p
a
c
e
s
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
51
1
of
93
0
Mi
x
e
d
-
U
s
e
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
Ex
a
m
p
l
e
s
-
-
T
h
r
e
e
s
t
o
r
i
e
s
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
51
2
of
93
0
F
i
r
d
a
l
e
V
i
l
l
a
g
e
R
e
z
o
n
e
F
i
r
d
a
l
e
A
v
e
n
u
e
,
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
,
W
A
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
r
i
t
e
r
i
a
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
2
0
0
9
T
a
b
l
e
o
f
C
o
n
t
e
n
t
s
1
.
Z
o
n
i
n
g
C
r
i
t
e
r
i
a
L
a
n
g
u
a
g
e
2
.
F
i
g
u
r
e
s
a
.
V
i
c
i
n
i
t
y
M
a
p
b
.
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
M
a
p
c
.
R
o
o
f
S
h
a
p
e
D
i
a
g
r
a
m
s
d
.
3
D
s
i
t
e
s
k
e
t
c
h
3
.
S
u
p
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
l
I
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
2
1
7
0
5
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
9
9
,
S
u
i
t
e
2
,
L
y
n
n
w
o
o
d
,
W
A
9
8
0
3
6
4
2
5
.
7
7
8
.
5
4
0
0
F
A
X
.
7
7
8
.
7
0
9
6
P
a
c
k
e
t
P
a
g
e
5
1
3
o
f
9
3
0
1
Firdale Village Site -- Design Standards
A.D. Shapiro Architects / DRAFT 12-10-08
Firdale Village
Mixed Use Zoning Criteria
Draft 02-26-2008
16.100.000 Introduction
16.100.010 Purposes
16.100.020 Sub-Districts
16.100.030 Uses
16.100.040 Site Development Standards
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
16.100.000 Introduction
General Intent and Project Vision
The design vision for Firdale Village is to create a vibrant neighborhood
village form of development that strikes a balance between commercial, retail
and residential uses and contributes to the vitality of the neighborhood and
area. The project is intended to support a variety of commercial and retail
uses along with multi-family residential in an environment that is accessible to
the pedestrian, visitor, tenant, motorist and public transit user.
16.100.010 Purposes
The Firdale Village Mixed-Use zone has the following specific purposes in
addition to the general purposes for business and commercial zones in
Chapter 16.40 ECDC.
A. To reserve and regulate areas for a ‘neighborhood center’ type of
mixed-use development that includes a mix of commercial and multi-
residential housing types, and a range of greater densities than are available in
the single family residential zone;
B. To promote a mix of residential, commercial and other uses in a
manner that is consistent with the City’s comprehensive plan,
C. To provide for those additional uses which complement and are
compatible with multiple residential uses.
D. The Codes contained within this Chapter are to be used in conjunction
with the Firdale Village Design Standards in Chapter 22.100.000 ECDC.
Packet Page 514 of 930
2
Firdale Village Site -- Design Standards
A.D. Shapiro Architects / DRAFT 12-10-08
16.100.020 Sub-Districts
See Figure B for location of Districts on the site.
A. District 1 – Commercial: The primarily commercial uses will be
located in this district, which is located closer to Firdale Avenue and oriented
to the street. The flexibility for each is written into the table, but not called
out in the “mini-description”.
B. District 2 – Commercial/Multi-Family Residential: Multi-family
residential uses will be located more towards sides and rear of the site, behind
the commercial uses, with possible commercial functions on the ground level.
16.100.030 Uses
A. Table 16.100.030-1
Permitted Uses
Dist 1
Com-
mercial
Dist 2
Multi-
Family
Residential Uses
Single-family dwelling X X
Multiple dwelling unit(s) A A
Housing for low-income elderly and senior housing A A
Commercial Uses
Retail stores or sales A A
Offices A A
Service uses including professional service offices A A
Dist 1
Com
Dist 2
MF
Retail uses allowed regardless of size include grocery stores, pharmacy/
drug stores and bookstores. A E
Retail sales requiring intensive outdoor display or storage areas, such as
trailer sales, used car lots (except as part of a new car sales and service
dealer), and heavy equipment storage, sales or services X X
Restaurants (excluding drive-through) A A
Dist 1
Com
Dist 2
MF
Packet Page 515 of 930
3
Firdale Village Site -- Design Standards
A.D. Shapiro Architects / DRAFT 12-10-08
Pubs, taverns or bars A X
Enclosed fabrication or assembly areas associated with and on the same
property as an art studio, art gallery, shoe repair, restaurant or food
service establishment that also provides an on-site retail outlet open to
the public A E
Automobile sales and service X X
Dry cleaning and laundry plants which use only nonflammable and non-
explosive cleaning agents C E
Printing, publishing and binding establishments C C
Community-oriented open air markets conducted as an outdoor
operation and licensed pursuant to provisions in the Edmonds City Code A A
Bus stop shelters A X
Churches, subject to the requirements of ECDC 17.100.020 A E
Local public facilities subject to the requirements of ECDC 17.100.050 C C
Off-street parking and loading areas to serve a permitted use B B
Commuter parking lots in conjunction with a facility otherwise
permitted in this zone B B
Commercial parking lots A C
Wholesale uses X X
Hotels and motels A A
Amusement establishments C X
Auction businesses, excluding vehicle or livestock auctions X X
Drive-in businesses X X
Laboratories X X
Fabrication of light industrial products not otherwise listed as a
permitted use X X
Day-care centers C C
Hospitals, health clinics, convalescent homes, rest homes, sanitariums A A
Museums and art galleries of primarily local concern that do not meet
the criteria for regional public facilities as defined in ECDC 21.85.033 A E
Dist 1
Com
Dist 2
MF
Large retail stores (larger than 20,000 GSF), excluding drug stores, X X
Packet Page 516 of 930
4
Firdale Village Site -- Design Standards
A.D. Shapiro Architects / DRAFT 12-10-08
pharmacies, grocery stores and bookstores.
Residential treatment facilities for alcoholics and drug abusers X X
Light Industrial X X
Outdoor storage, incidental to a permitted use D D
A = Permitted primary use
B = Permitted secondary use
C = Primary uses requiring a conditional use permit
D = Secondary uses requiring a conditional use permit
E = Permitted primary use on ground level floor only
X = Not permitted
16.100.040 Development Standards
A. Development Standards – General
Development Requirements can be summarized as follows:
See District Map figure B
B. Building Scale and Building Height
1. Intent: To provide a consistency of architectural scale for different
sections of the development:
The more commercial/retail area closer to Firdale Avenue shall be
lower in scale than the multi-family buildings oriented to the rear
of the site.
Building Height:
a. District 1: Commercial/Office/Retail:
One (1) – three (3) stories.
Minimum height: 20 feet; Maximum height 39 feet.
b. District 2: Multi-family Residential:
Maximum -- 4 stories, with conditions. (See Note b.(1) below.
Maximum height: 48 feet base height, for four stories,
with possibility of an additional 4 feet, (to allow for
variation in rooflines – See Note b (2) below)
Packet Page 517 of 930
5
Firdale Village Site -- Design Standards
A.D. Shapiro Architects / DRAFT 12-10-08
(1) A fourth story will be allowed in District 2, for multi-
family uses, providing that the project is set up from the outset
to integrate green design methods and technologies throughout
the project. The project must achieve at least a 4-star level of
the Built Green of Washington program or a LEED gold
certification. See also ECDC Design Standards 22.100.090.
(2) Roof only may extend four feet above the 48 foot
height limit if all portions of the roof above the stated height
are modulated in design and are designed as a hip, gable, arch,
shed or other similar roof forms. Vertical parapet walls are not
allowed to protrude above the 48 foot height limit unless they
are part of an approved modulated design. For examples of
permissible forms, see figures C1, C2, C3, C3, and C4.
3. Elevator shaft and/or /Stairway penthouse shafts may extend above
this maximum up to ten feet (10’) above the roof.
4. Mechanical equipment may extend above this maximum up to
five feet (5’) above the roof.
C. Parking Standards
1. Minimum Spaces Required
a. Retail/Commercial including office and restaurant uses:
Minimum: Provide one space for every 400 SF.
A certain portion of parking places designated for office space
must also be shared with multi-family residential uses, and are
easily accessible to multi-family residential units.
b. Multi-Family Uses:
Minimum: Provide 1.5 spaces per unit.
Additional parking for residential units would be provided in a
shared parking area for office/commercial and residential.
c. For Guest Parking, provide 1 space for every ten (10) units or
0.10 spaces for every unit as a minimum.
2. For shared parking arrangements, a legal agreement describing
terms of the shared parking arrangement shall be required between
the property management companies/owners of the residential and
commercial uses describing the joint use of the parking areas, and
will require approval by the planning jurisdiction.
Packet Page 518 of 930
6
Firdale Village Site -- Design Standards
A.D. Shapiro Architects / DRAFT 12-10-08
D. Site Setbacks/Buffers
See Diagram 16.100.040 D-1 below for illustration of
setbacks, buffers and related notes.
1. Minimum side setbacks are 15 feet.
2. The minimum setback on the northern boundary of the site
is 20 feet. This buffer includes protection of the existing evergreen
trees which will help to serve as a buffer between the development
and adjacent residential uses.
Note: Setback distances refer to areas above ground.
Underground structures can be within the above grade building
setback area as long as adequate soil depth is provided to support
the existence of tree and vegetation, with the exception of the north
property line which contain existing established fir trees.
3. Where the proposed development abuts a single-family residential
(RS) zoned property, in addition to complying with subsection (a)
of this footnote, the proposed development shall modulate the
design of any building facades facing the single-family
residentially (RS) zoned property. See Design Standards for
additional information.
E. Tree Retention and Buffer on North Boundary
See Diagram 16.100.040 ___________
The project site plan shall retain the existing stand of evergreen trees at
the north end of the site, to help serve as a buffer between the new
buildings and the residential parcels bordering the project.
The buffer area (setback) on the north boundary of the site shall not be
less than 20’ feet in the area designated as buffer with trees, see figures
B, & D.
Packet Page 519 of 930
7
Firdale Village Site -- Design Standards
A.D. Shapiro Architects / DRAFT 12-10-08
F. Open Space
1. Design Intent: The project shall include a comprehensive open
space network that uses courtyards and other open space elements
to connect the residential and commercial uses.
2. Open Space Requirements:
Minimum open space requirement for the development:
20% of total site area.
The minimum open space requirement may include all developed
pedestrian areas including landscaped walkways, plazas,
courtyards and other passive open spaces in the commercial area.
The calculation may also include public open space for the
residential uses. The calculation shall not include private open
space for residential uses, parking areas, driveways, service areas,
setbacks or other buffer areas.
G. Design Standards
For more descriptive information on Design Standards and guidelines,
please see ECDC Chapter 22.100.
Packet Page 520 of 930
Fi
g
u
r
e
A
Vi
c
i
n
i
t
y
M
a
p
FI
R
D
A
L
E
V
I
L
L
A
G
E
N.
2
0
5
t
h
A
V
E
N
U
E
S
T
.
AU
R
O
R
A
V
I
L
L
A
G
E
FI
R
D
A
L
E
A
V
E
N
U
E
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
52
1
of
93
0
F
i
g
u
r
e
B
D
I
S
T
R
I
C
T
Z
O
N
E
S
P
a
c
k
e
t
P
a
g
e
5
2
2
o
f
9
3
0
F
i
g
u
r
e
C
R
o
o
f
D
i
a
g
r
a
m
s
F
i
g
u
r
e
C
1
F
i
g
u
r
e
C
2
P
a
c
k
e
t
P
a
g
e
5
2
3
o
f
9
3
0
F
i
g
u
r
e
C
4
F
i
g
u
r
e
C
R
o
o
f
D
i
a
g
r
a
m
s
F
i
g
u
r
e
C
3
P
a
c
k
e
t
P
a
g
e
5
2
4
o
f
9
3
0
Fi
g
u
r
e
D
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
T
r
e
e
R
e
t
e
n
t
i
o
n
D
i
a
g
r
a
m
FI
R
D
A
L
E
A
V
E
N
U
E
EX
I
S
T
I
N
G
T
R
E
E
S
A
T
N
O
R
T
H
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
Y
L
I
N
E
,
G
R
E
E
N
ZO
N
E
O
N
G
R
O
U
N
D
EX
I
S
T
I
N
G
H
O
U
S
E
S
O
N
A
D
J
A
C
E
N
T
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
I
E
S
EX
I
S
T
I
N
G
B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G
S
A
T
F
I
R
D
A
L
E
V
I
L
L
A
G
E
T
O
BE
R
E
M
O
V
E
D
TR
E
E
S
O
U
T
S
I
D
E
O
F
S
E
T
B
A
C
K
(
S
)
S
U
B
J
E
C
T
T
O
RE
M
O
V
A
L
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
52
5
of
93
0
Firdale Village Site -- Design Standards -- 1
A.D. Shapiro Architects / DRAFT 02-04-09
Firdale Village Site
Design Standards
Draft 02-04-09
Index
22.100.000 Applicability and Goals
22.100.010 Site Design and Planning
22.100.020 Architectural Design
22.100.030 Pedestrian Orientation, Outdoor Spaces & Amenities
22.100.040 Vehicular Access and Parking
22.100.050 Site Landscaping & Screening Elements
22.100.060 Signage
22.100.070 Site Lighting
22.100.080 Safety Issues
22.100.090 Sustainable Design
Aerial view of existing Firdale Village site.
Packet Page 526 of 930
Firdale Village Site -- Design Standards -- 2
A.D. Shapiro Architects / DRAFT 02-04-09
22.100.000 Applicability and Goals
A. Applicability
The design standards in this chapter apply to all development within the
Firdale Village MU zone, including the sub-districts contained within the larger
zone.
The Design Standards use imperative language such as “shall” and “must” to
indicate high priority features and a strong directive toward satisfying the
‘Standards’ intent. Words such as “should” and “may” indicate desirable
conditions or elements that are strongly encouraged.
B . Goals and Intent
The Design Standards will help to shape a neighborhood village form of
development, a place of complementary uses within an aesthetically attractive,
easily accessible and economically healthy environment. The guidelines and
standards will be used to create an attractive, inviting environment for residential
and commercial uses, with an emphasis on the needs of the pedestrian, including
the needs of senior citizens, youths and physically challenged persons, but that is
also accessible for vehicles.
Development should be located to facilitate transit and non-motorized travel
modes. On-site facilities that are convenient and attractive to pedestrians,
bicyclists and vehicles are encouraged. The development will be designed to
include the following uses, and will also evolve and change over time:
Retail shops and stores, professional offices, restaurants, services, multi-
residential and community related outdoor areas and facilities.
C. Project Vision
1. Scale and Form -- The vision for Firdale Village is the creation of a
vibrant neighborhood village development that demonstrates a balance between
commercial, retail and residential uses and contributes to the vitality of the
neighborhood and area. The project is intended to create an environment that is
accessible and inviting to the pedestrian, visitor, tenant, motorist and public
transit user. The project can also be an important example of a more sustainable
form of development, one that incorporates sustainable design strategies and
methods in many aspects of the project, from site design, construction to long
term water and energy efficiency.
Packet Page 527 of 930
Firdale Village Site -- Design Standards -- 3
A.D. Shapiro Architects / DRAFT 02-04-09
New development should include pedestrian amenities that bring residents and
customers to the development, including local shopping, services, offices,
specialty retail, restaurants, and other related uses. Outdoor spaces should
function as social settings for a variety of experiences, while maintaining a human
scale and ability for easy pedestrian circulation.
22.100 .010 Site Design and Planning
A. Intent
1. The project design shall respond to special opportunities and
constraints of the site, including solar orientation, changes in topography,
preservation of existing trees as buffer, and opportunities for low impact site
design.
2. The project design shall take advantage of the southern solar
orientation for multi-family residential orientation and outdoor courtyards as well
as designing adequate usable open space and landscaped areas in both private
residential and commercial sub-districts. The project should also respond to
other local climatic and ecological context by incorporating the site’s natural
systems including significant trees, hydrology and geology into design solutions.
3. In general, the designer should consider the site design as a whole in
helping to create an inviting environment for residents, tenants and visitors. In
order to clarify possibilities for sustainable design, goals for sustainability and
green technologies shall be set in the initial stages of project design.
B. Site Features
1. Pedestrian Orientation.
The project shall include a pedestrian orientation with public amenities, such as
buildings with ground floor orientation to the streetscape and public spaces,
pedestrian walkways, street trees, attractive landscaping, outdoor areas with
seating and other amenities, and places for gathering. Additional amenities in
public spaces such as fountains, sculpture or other forms of art are highly
encouraged. (See Pedestrian Orientation section for more description).
The use of materials, color, texture, form and massing, proportion, public
amenities, landscaping and vegetation along with mitigation of environmental
impacts, should be incorporated in the design of the project with the purpose of
supporting a human scale, pedestrian-oriented development.
Packet Page 528 of 930
Firdale Village Site -- Design Standards -- 4
A.D. Shapiro Architects / DRAFT 02-04-09
2. Tree Retention -- The project site plan shall retain the existing stand of
evergreen trees at the north end of the site, to help serve as a buffer between the
new buildings and the residential parcels bordering the project.
Illustration depicting existing large trees on the site
that act as buffer on north boundary of the site.
(Add image – Context map )
Large storefront windows,
overhead metal canopy , lush
landscaping and attention to
detail help to create a strong
pedestrian orientation.
Packet Page 529 of 930
Firdale Village Site -- Design Standards -- 5
A.D. Shapiro Architects / DRAFT 02-04-09
C. Open Space – Design Intent:
The project shall include a comprehensive open space network that uses
courtyards and other open space elements to connect the residential and
commercial uses.
1. The design and layout of required plazas, courtyards and other public
gathering spaces should contribute to the overall sense of place and help attract
pedestrian users to the development.
The project should be designed in such a way to allow some views into the
public plazas and open space from Firdale Avenue, to help create an inviting and
welcoming ambiance from outside the development. It is important to achieve a
balance between creating inviting, usable public spaces and buffering noise and
other traffic issues from Firdale Avenue. A more transparent configuration, that
allows views from the street into the development, will also help create an
inviting ambiance and make visible the pedestrian friendly character of the
development
2. Open Space Requirements:
Minimum open space requirement for the development:
20% of total site area.
The minimum open space requirement may include all developed pedestrian
areas including landscaped walkways, plazas, courtyards and other passive open
spaces in the commercial area. The calculation may also include public open
space for the residential uses. The calculation shall not include private open
space for residential uses, parking areas, driveways, service areas, setbacks or
other buffer areas.
3.. Residential Open Space:
Residential Development should include private open space or outdoor areas for
residents. These areas should be configured and designed so as to ensure privacy
for residential uses while also providing linkages to the public open space
components of the project. Seating areas should be provided as an important
part of the usable open spaces, and coordinated with landscaping, shaded areas,
lighting and orientation to focal points.
Packet Page 530 of 930
Firdale Village Site -- Design Standards -- 6
A.D. Shapiro Architects / DRAFT 02-04-09
22.100 .020 Architectural Design
A. Design Intent
To create a unified design concept for the project that reflects the neighborhood
village form of development, while allowing for some individual expression of
each building. The massing, layout and individual design of each building should
be compatible with its neighboring buildings, yet complement the neighborhood
village character. In general, all aspects of the project, from landscaped open
spaces to project signage should be well-designed and coordinated with the
project as a whole.
1. Scale.
The designers shall consider how the structure and site development
will be viewed from the street and adjacent properties. Scale is not simply the
size of the buildings, it is the proportion of buildings in relationship to each
other, to the street and to the pedestrian environment. Because of the bowl-like
topography, the larger scale buildings will be toward the side and rear of the site,
with lower scale commercial buildings toward Firdale Avenue.
2. Form and Style.
The objectives and standards do not set a particular style of
architecture or design theme. The style and site design shall be pedestrian in scale
and address design features such as distinctive building shapes; incorporation of
a number of design elements on building facades, with particular focus on
ground floor, integration of art; interesting textures and patterns; treatment of
public spaces; landscaping; and signage.
Building forms shall not present visual mass or bulk impacts that are
out of proportion to the adjoining structures, or that appear from the
street or sidewalk as having unmodulated visual mass or bulk.
Building additions should complement the original structure in design
Mixed-use development with variation in scale and height. Variety of retail
facades, along with interesting storefronts creates visual interest at the ground level.
Packet Page 531 of 930
Firdale Village Site -- Design Standards -- 7
A.D. Shapiro Architects / DRAFT 02-04-09
B. Architectural Character
1. Building Siting and Orientation
a. Where feasible, primary commercial buildings should be oriented
to the street frontage to enliven the street edge as well as to
maximize access from the public sidewalk. Because not all of the
commercial space will be oriented towards Firdale Avenue,
primary entrances may also be oriented to side streets or towards
a rear courtyard as the site design warrants.
b. All visible building frontages and ground floor commercial spaces
should be detailed with architectural elements.
(See Building Facades, below).
c. Commercial uses are located towards the front of the site, with
orientation towards Firdale Avenue. Residential uses are located
towards the rear of the site to allow for greater privacy and
buffering from street noise and activity.
2. Building Articulation
a. In order to prevent long stretches of monotonous facades,
buildings over 100 feet in length as measured parallel to a
roadway or public open space shall be vertically articulated along
the façade at regular intervals.
b. Articulation may be accomplished in several ways, including:
Modulation – the stepping back of projection of a portion of the
façade, including significant building elements such as balconies,
porches, canopies, entry areas, etc. that visually break up the
façade. Articulation can also be accomplished through
adding building focal points which include distinctive entry
features, changing the roofline and changing materials.
Mixed-Use Building with modulation of façade along with emphasis on development of ground
floor retail uses.
Packet Page 532 of 930
Firdale Village Site -- Design Standards -- 8
A.D. Shapiro Architects / DRAFT 02-04-09
3. Building Facades
a. Objectives.
Building facades should be designed with a variety of
architectural elements that suggest the buildings’ use and provide
visual interest to residents and pedestrians. Special focus should
be given to mass, scale roof forms and landscaping, with special
attention to the ground floor of retail and commercial buildings.
b. Street-facing and major Façade Elements:
All major mixed-use, commercial and/or retail buildings within
the development shall include at least six (6) of the following
elements on the major facades, (to be defined) with at least five
(5) elements on the ground floor.
(1) Window and doors treatments which embellish the
façade.
(2) Unique façade treatment, such as decorative materials
and design elements.
(3) Decorative light fixtures.
(4) Decorative paving.
(5) Recessed entrances.
(6) Balconies.
(7) Railings, gill work, gates
(8) Unique landscaping.
(9) Belt courses.
(10) Decorative tile work.
(11) Projecting metal and glass canopy
(12) Clerestories over storefront windows.
Building façade with emphasis on development of ground
floor – with attention to building entry and other attractive
façade detail including iron grill balconies above.
Packet Page 533 of 930
Firdale Village Site -- Design Standards -- 9
A.D. Shapiro Architects / DRAFT 02-04-09
Use of high quality materials and decorative building details
including exterior lighting and grill work add interest.
Retail façade with emphasis on the ground floor and entry. Architectural detail
includes large windows in storefront, large glass entry door, recessed entry, arched
windows above, contrasting stone outlining entry, structural canopy above entry,
large sign integrated into building façade, hanging blade sign to the left, and
landscaped planters in front.
Mixed-use building
with large scale
storefront windows
helps to maximize
transparency at
ground level. Metal
canopy, use of
durable materials
and lighting adds to
visual interest.
Packet Page 534 of 930
Firdale Village Site -- Design Standards -- 10
A.D. Shapiro Architects / DRAFT 02-04-09
c. Walls
Blank walls without visual or architectural interest shall be
avoided. Buildings shall provide massing breaks along wall
expanses and walls shall include visual or architectural treatments.
Walls facing the sidewalk or other pedestrian spaces should be
treated with recesses, landscaping, windows, seating, recessed
secondary entrances, balconies, belt courses, cornices, and other
means of breaking up the blank wall surface.
d. Ground Floor Windows and Doors
Major commercial buildings should have at least 75 percent of
the length of the ground floor façade between the height of two
feet and seven feet devoted to windows and doors affording
views into retail, office or lobby space.
e. Transparent Facades
Major commercial building facades should have a high degree of
transparency into the first floor offices/retail to help create a
more inviting ambiance. See section d. above on Ground Floor
Windows and Doors.
Storefront design with
a high degree of
transparency from
walkway or sidewalk.
Packet Page 535 of 930
Firdale Village Site -- Design Standards -- 10
A.D. Shapiro Architects / DRAFT 02-04-09
c. Walls
Blank walls without visual or architectural interest shall be
avoided. Buildings shall provide massing breaks along wall
expanses and walls shall include visual or architectural treatments.
Walls facing the sidewalk or other pedestrian spaces should be
treated with recesses, landscaping, windows, seating, recessed
secondary entrances, balconies, belt courses, cornices, and other
means of breaking up the blank wall surface.
d. Ground Floor Windows and Doors
Major commercial buildings should have at least 75 percent of
the length of the ground floor façade between the height of two
feet and seven feet devoted to windows and doors affording
views into retail, office or lobby space.
e. Transparent Facades
Major commercial building facades should have a high degree of
transparency into the first floor offices/retail to help create a
more inviting ambiance. See section d. above on Ground Floor
Windows and Doors.
Storefront design with
a high degree of
transparency from
walkway or sidewalk.
Packet Page 536 of 930
Firdale Village Site -- Design Standards -- 11
A.D. Shapiro Architects / DRAFT 02-04-09
Building with large storefront windows, overhead canopy and
large street trees
f. Upper Story Facades
Upper stories of buildings above two stories should maintain an
expression line along the façade such as a setback, change of
material, or a projection to reduce the perceived building mass.
Upper-story features should include but are not limited to
balconies, roof decks, or bay windows.
g. Long Buildings
Long buildings, more than 50 feet in length, shall provide relief to
perceived building mass through such features as varied setback
or heights, or projecting windows, entrances or walls.
Long linear walls should be staggered horizontally and vertically
to provide interest.
h. Entrances
Building entrances should concentrate along the sidewalk and
should be physically and visually inviting. Entrance doors should
be recessed from the façade surface to emphasize the entrance
and provide a sheltered transition to the interior of the building.
Special paving treatments may be used to enhance the entry.
i. Pedestrian walkways
Pedestrian walkways should be a minimum of eight (8) feet wide,
and be landscaped appropriately. Wheelchair ramps should be
constructed between the sidewalk and building entrances.
Packet Page 537 of 930
Firdale Village Site -- Design Standards -- 12
A.D. Shapiro Architects / DRAFT 02-04-09
j Building Facades Oriented towards Residential Areas.
Building facades facing north towards the single family residential
areas shall be designed to include elements to create an
interesting architectural expression as opposed to blank walls.
Elements shall include those associated with multi-family
residences such as balconies, roof decks, or bay windows, along
with modulation of building facades. .
4. Materials and Color
a. Objectives:
The buildings should include textured high quality materials and
colors and provide a visually interesting experience. Color should
be carefully considered in relation to the overall project design.
Color and materials should highlight architectural elements such
as doors, windows, fascias, cornices, lintels, sills and pedestrian
amenities.
b. Development and Design Standards:
Building Exteriors: shall be constructed from high quality and
durable materials, that will require minimal maintenance.
Color: A harmonious range of colors should be used on all
buildings. Bright colors should be used only for trim and accents.
22.100.030 Pedestrian Orientation, Outdoor Spaces & Amenities
A. Design Intent:
The project should incorporate a network of well designed, attractive
pedestrian spaces throughout the project. The commercial area will feature
various sizes of public spaces, completed with outdoor furnishings and
amenities to help create a safe, inviting environment for visitors and residents.
B. Pedestrian Connections
1. Attractive well-marked pedestrian links between parking and
buildings shall be provided. The connections shall be designed to enhance
pedestrian safety through clearly marked walkways across traffic lanes,
landscaped areas and parking lots.
2. Where walkways cross driveways and traffic lanes, special features
should be used to increase safety for pedestrians. Potential features include
raised or textured pavement to define the pedestrian space, raised curbs, curb
extensions or low-level lighting such as bollard lights.
Packet Page 538 of 930
Firdale Village Site -- Design Standards -- 13
A.D. Shapiro Architects / DRAFT 02-04-09
3. Pedestrian connections should be provided between buildings with
special focus on connections between residential and commercial areas.
4. Pedestrian connections should include design cues to help demarcate
the transition between public and private spaces. Design cues may include a
change in materials, colors, landscaping or the dimensions of the space.
5. Illumination of walkways should be concentrated along the
pedestrian paths leading to parking areas and in the specific areas where cars are
parked.
6. Walkways should be landscaped where feasible.
7. The project shall include at least one pedestrian pathway through the
parking area(s) to the main entrance from the street.
C. Pedestrian Amenities -- Commercial and public areas:
1. Pedestrian amenities such as street trees, landscaping, and seasonal
flowers, benches, lighting, banners and possibly artwork shall be provided to
create interest along walkways, courtyards and other pedestrian oriented spaces.
Amenities including street trees, planted areas, canopies, wide sidewalks
and street furniture emphasize the pedestrian orientation of the project.
2. All public open spaces, walkways, and sidewalks shall meet ADA
standards.
3. The addition of texture to the ground plane of sidewalks and plazas
with unit pavers, bricks, tiles or public artwork is strongly encouraged.
4. Safe public walkways around and through parking areas shall be
provided as an important part of the site layout and design. (See B1-6 above).
5. Awnings, arcades, pergolas, and/or overhangs should be provided to
protect pedestrians from inclement weather whenever possible.
6. Pedestrian amenities and detailing of site furniture, lighting, paving,
and site amenities should be consistent throughout the development to help
create a recognizable identity and image.
Packet Page 539 of 930
Firdale Village Site -- Design Standards -- 14
A.D. Shapiro Architects / DRAFT 02-04-09
7. Separate areas should be provided for active and passive activities.
8. Residential buildings should provide an easily accessible gathering
space for building occupants and their guests. Examples include an upper level
or roof-top patio area or an at-grade courtyard.
D. Pedestrian Oriented Spaces
1. Mixed-use areas shall emphasize pedestrian orientation by
incorporating features such as plazas, interior walkways, outdoor courtyards,
outdoor seating areas, fountains, outdoor street furniture and other similar
elements.
2. Outdoor Spaces
A variety of outdoor spaces shall be provided, including patios,
courtyards, plazas and other landscaped open spaces, which should be
proportionate in size to the development.
a. Courtyards:
(1) An outdoor covered or uncovered area easily accessible to
the public at the same level as the public sidewalk or
pedestrian connections which should:
Be at least 8 feet in width, with a building façade on at least
one side; and minimum area of 100 SF.
Be landscaped with groundcover, shrubs, trees or other
landscaping over 25% of its area.
The design should include seating, special paving material,
pedestrian-scale lighting and other pedestrian furnishings;
(2) Minimum number of courtyards: three (3) separate
courtyards with minimum dimensions above.
b. Plazas, Mini-plazas, Squares and other open spaces
Public plazas and other gathering areas should be provided to
encourage community activity in open spaces, particularly at the
edges that relate to building openings, natural features, or
activities. Public plazas and gathering areas shall be of sufficient
size to encourage passive gathering activity and permit
permanent/temporary seating and shall incorporate other
elements as described:
(1) There shall be pedestrian linkages leading to and from the
plazas to natural features and other pedestrian paths.
(2) A plaza should have an articulated edge (buildings, benches,
landscaping, etc.) where feasible to provide visual interest and
additional seating along the edges of the plaza where people may
linger out of the pedestrian traffic flow.
Packet Page 540 of 930
Firdale Village Site -- Design Standards -- 15
A.D. Shapiro Architects / DRAFT 02-04-09
(3) Amenities shall be provided such as seating, lighting, plants,
drinking fountains, distinctive paving, art work, bicycle racks or
structures (either open or covered); and such focal points as a
sculpture or water feature.
a) Plaza Amenities: -- Minimum quantity of amenities
Minimum quantity for Plazas shall include four (4) main
elements of the following:
(a) Pedestrian oriented seating;
(b) Permanent Landscaping elements including
planting beds, large potted plants and other
landscaping elements that add visual interest;
(c ) Outdoor lighting element; (other than walkway
lighting for safety),
(d) Outdoor artwork or sculptures;
(e) Outdoor fountains;
(f) Information kiosks;
(g) Trash Receptacles;
b) Plaza Amenities -- Additional elements
that can be included above the minimum elements
listed above:
(a) Decorative clocks,
(b) Special paving patterns/ or tree grates;
(c ) Bicycle racks;
(d) Other amenities that meet the intent of providing
high-quality, pedestrian oriented usable space.
(4) Pedestrian furniture for plazas, courtyards, walkways and
other public spaces shall be made of durable, weather-resistant
materials and can be reasonably maintained over an extended
period of time.
(5) The quantity, type, placement and location of amenity
elements shall contribute to a well-balanced mix of features that
provide attractive, inviting, usable outdoor spaces.
(6) Color, form and texture are integral to the overall design
of the plaza. Design of the plaza should incorporate some soft as
well as hard surface areas (landscaped and special pavement
areas).
(7) Minimum size of mini-plaza -- 1000 SF
(8) Minimum number of plazas – two (2)
(1). One (1) at least 1,000 SF, and one larger plaza
See below.
(2). One larger plaza as a primary open space with focal
point(s) shall be provided in the commercial area.
Packet Page 541 of 930
Firdale Village Site -- Design Standards -- 16
A.D. Shapiro Architects / DRAFT 02-04-09
Courtyard space surrounding fountain with artwork, street furniture, trees and
potted plants.
c. Configuration and Linking of Outdoor Spaces.
Where possible, smaller outdoor spaces, including courtyards and
plazas shall be designed to be adjacent to another outdoor space
to increase the size and usability of outdoor spaces.
Where possible, several outdoor spaces should be linked to help
create a mini-park or usable outdoor space, complete with
landscaping, planters, pedestrian oriented furnishings and other
amenities. The intention is to provide both usable smaller
outdoor spaces, and larger plazas that can help to provide a
larger, more park-like open space or public square that can be
utilized for outdoor event, gatherings or community type market.
l
Open area between buildings can be designed as usable outdoor space.
Packet Page 542 of 930
Firdale Village Site -- Design Standards -- 17
A.D. Shapiro Architects / DRAFT 02-04-09
Small courtyard outside restaurant, separated from adjacent
open space by a low wall/fountain.
Small courtyard created by Narrow courtyard for dining area
recessed area in building. can be created adjacent to restaurant.
Open space courtyard adjacent to storefronts with fountain, seating stones,
artwork and landscaping.
Packet Page 543 of 930
Firdale Village Site -- Design Standards -- 18
A.D. Shapiro Architects / DRAFT 02-04-09
d. Residential Balconies and Decks
Upper story decks, and balconies as private open space should
also be incorporated for residential use. Balconies should be
appropriately scaled and incorporated into the overall design of
the building. The designer should consider environmental
conditions such as sun, shade, and prevailing winds when
designing outdoor spaces including courtyards, decks, balconies
other usable open spaces.
E. Dedicated Public Meeting Space
The project shall provide a public meeting room shall be provided of not
less than 1,000 SF, with at least one wall with windows to the outside,
within the commercial section of the project.
Preferably, the room should be located adjacent to a courtyard or other
usable public outdoor spaces or plazas, so as to be easily located and
accessible to the public. The property manager/owner shall provide
access to the room on a reservation basis, and provide custodial service
for the space on a regular basis.
In addition, a restaurant or coffee shop may provide a meeting room
adjacent to a primary dining room as an amenity, and may determine
rules of access and reservation of the space.
22.100.040 Vehicular Access and Parking
A. Parking Layout and Design
1. Parking should be located on the sides, to the rear of projects or
below grade with pedestrian connections between the parking areas and the
commercial and/or residential buildings.
2. Building siting and parking design should maximize opportunities for
pedestrian and vehicular circulation between adjacent buildings or subdistricts,
such as joint access easements and common driveways. The layout should limit
the conflict between pedestrians and cars to the greatest extent possible.
B. Access Drives
Building siting and parking design should maximize opportunities for
shared parking, access entries and driveways in order to minimize the number of
curb cuts. This will help to limit possible conflicts between pedestrians and
vehicles entering and leaving the parking area.
Packet Page 544 of 930
Firdale Village Site -- Design Standards -- 19
A.D. Shapiro Architects / DRAFT 02-04-09
C. Vehicular Entrances and Driveways
The site plan should allow maximum of three (3) access points from
Firdale Avenue to the project.
22.100.050 Site Landscaping & Screening Elements
A. General Landscaping
Site landscaping should be designed to achieve the project vision as described in
Section A. Trees and landscaping shall be incorporated into the site design in
order to provide a more attractive overall pedestrian oriented environment and
to soften and screen the visual impact of hard surfaces such as parking lots,
service areas, walkways and gathering places. Outdoor furniture should be
compatible with the project architecture and should be carefully considered as
integral elements of the landscape.
The combination of trees, planted areas, potted plants, and street furniture
all work together to create an inviting, walkable environment.
1. A range of landscape materials, trees, evergreen shrubs, groundcovers
and seasonal flowers shall be provided for color and visual interest.
2. Trees should be placed to allow southern sun exposure in such a
manner as not to conflict with pedestrian activity areas. (For this reason trees
with a fine leaf texture are also preferred in the plaza.)
3. Planters or large pots with small shrubs and seasonal flowers may
also be used to separate café seating from traffic flow and create protected sub-
areas within the plaza for sitting and people watching.
Packet Page 545 of 930
Firdale Village Site -- Design Standards -- 20
A.D. Shapiro Architects / DRAFT 02-04-09
4. Creative use of plant materials such as climbing vines or trellises, and
use of sculpture groupings, etc. are also encouraged.
5. Native and drought tolerant plants should be used where possible.
A minimum of 20% of all landscaped areas should include native drought
tolerant plants.
6. Sun angle at noon and wind pattern should be considered in the
design of the open space and courtyards to maximize sunlight areas.
7. Recommended materials include: brick, concrete, unit pavers, tile,
stone and wood (some seating).
8. No dumpsters or service areas shall be adjacent to open space.
9. Public restrooms should be located nearby in an accessible public
space.
Various forms of landscaping, including trees, planted areas, hanging plants, trellises and uses of potted
plants, site lighting, help to create an inviting and attractive ambiance within the development.
A well-designed
landscape plan will help
to provide walkable
connections and usable
open space throughout
the project.
Packet Page 546 of 930
Firdale Village Site -- Design Standards -- 21
A.D. Shapiro Architects / DRAFT 02-04-09
B. Landscaping – Parking Lots
1. Parking areas shall be screened from pedestrian-oriented areas
through the use of trees, shrubs, walls and/or trellis structures with
plants.
2. Parking lots shall provide landscaping next to buildings and along
walkways. Landscape beds within parking lots should have a 90%
ground coverage in five years.
3. Parking areas shall have one tree per every 10 parking stalls.
C. Screening Elements
Intent: To minimize the negative visual impacts of service and
storage elements (ie. waste receptacles, loading docks), to the street and
pedestrian environment.
1. On-site Service Areas.
All on-site service areas, loading zones, outdoor storage areas, garbage collection
and recycling areas should be located in an area not visible from public streets or
important pedestrian areas of the site. These areas should be enclosed and
screened around their perimeter by a wall or fence at least seven feet high.
Service areas should be located and designed for easy access by service vehicles
and for convenient access by each tenant.
2. Service elements shall be located and designed to minimize the
impacts of the pedestrian environment and adjacent uses. Service elements
should generally by concentrated and located where they are accessible to service
vehicles and convenient for tenant use.
3. Roof-mounted mechanical equipment, meters and similar structures
and other similar elements shall be located so as not be visible from the street,
public open space, parking areas, or from the ground level of adjacent properties.
Screening features should blend with the adjacent buildings and project as a
whole.
Packet Page 547 of 930
Firdale Village Site -- Design Standards -- 22
A.D. Shapiro Architects / DRAFT 02-04-09
22.100.060 Signage
A. Design Intent:
To encourage signage that is clear, attractive and of an appropriate
scale for the project.
To provide consistent design criteria for the entire project.
To enhance the visual qualities of signage through the use of
complementary sizes, colors and methods of illumination.
To provide signage guidelines that meet commercial tenant needs.
. General Signage
Types of signage fall into several categories:
Tenant Signs (large and small), Site Entry Markers and Identification
Signs, Wayfinding signage, and Environmental Graphic Design
Elements
B. Design Standards
1. Signage must be of a high quality of design and materials, consistent
with the design of the project. Signage shall be consistent throughout the project
and always complement a building’s character.
2. Signage should be designed as an integral element of the building’s
Architecture. Wall and blade signs should not interfere with Architectural details
or disrupt the rhythm of windows.
3.. Signage should make a positive contribution to the overall visual
character of the streetscape. Signs should be appropriately sized with the scale of
the building. Materials and colors used in the construction of signs should be
compatible with the overall design of the site.
Packet Page 548 of 930
Firdale Village Site -- Design Standards -- 23
A.D. Shapiro Architects / DRAFT 02-04-09
Retail entry with hanging blade signs to left of entry. Storefront exhibits strong pedestrian orientation and
attention to detail including: recessed entry door, glass storefront, arched element over entry door, contrasting
materials of storefront, structural canopy and landscape planters in front.
4. Signs may be fabricated of mixed-media, including metal reverse-
illuminated letters, suspended neon letters, illuminated individual letters, signs
etched or cutout of solid materials such as wood or brass and illuminated from
behind.
Mixed media sign above door. Retail sign with large individual letters above canopy.
Packet Page 549 of 930
Firdale Village Site -- Design Standards -- 24
A.D. Shapiro Architects / DRAFT 02-04-09
5. Internally illuminated boxes with formed or painted lettering are not
permitted. Large internally illuminated boxes that serve as monument signs are
not permitted.
6. Instead, larger signs of wood or other non-transparent or translucent
material are allowed that have exterior sources of illumination (as opposed to
internal). Monument signs constructed from plastic or plastic-like material are
not allowed. However, monument signs that provide primary development
identification (project name) constructed from materials such as wood, metal or
other durable materials are allowed.
Monument sign on pedestal Ground level monument sign constructed
of solid materials
7. ‘Wayfinding signage.’ The project shall include a coordinated system
of signs to aid in visitor orientation and navigation through the project.
Packet Page 550 of 930
Firdale Village Site -- Design Standards -- 25
A.D. Shapiro Architects / DRAFT 02-04-09
22.100.070 Site Lighting
A. Objectives.
Lighting shall be an integral part of all components of the development.
Lighting shall contribute to the individuality, security and safety of the
site design without having overpowering effects on the adjacent areas.
Lighting is viewed as an important feature, for functional and security
purposes, as well as to enhance the streetscape and public spaces.
1. The design of light fixtures and their structural support should be
integrated with the architectural theme and style of the main structures
on the site, and with landscaping.
2. Pedestrian scale lighting (maximum 15’ height) and/or bollard
lighting shall be used to define pedestrian walkways, connections and
other pedestrian areas within the development.
Decorative pedestrian scale lighting along walkway Light fixture with hanging plants in
near parking lots. front of storefront.
3. Along walkways, low level lighting that directs light downward onto
the ground surface is encouraged. The design of the fixtures shall be
compatible with the overall design of the development, and shatterproof
lamp coverings will be used. The fixtures will be placed to minimize
glare and shall be located as to not present hazards for pedestrians or
vehicles.
Packet Page 551 of 930
Firdale Village Site -- Design Standards -- 26
A.D. Shapiro Architects / DRAFT 02-04-09
4. All lighting shall be shielded from the sky and adjacent properties and
structures, either through exterior shields or through optics within the
fixture. Light should not spill out onto surrounding properties or project
above the horizontal plan. Warm lighting colors are encouraged.
5. Within parking lots, a minimum foot candle of (1.0) at the perimeter
of light sources and between light sources, and 5.0 under light fixtures is
recommended. Light shall not exceed 0.5 foot candles at any property
line.
6. Wall mounted lights shall be directed downward. Soffit mounted
light fixtures should be recessed in the soffit or otherwise fully shielded
from any property line. Ground mounted or other upward directional
lighting will be permitted only where some form of shielding or light
baffling is provided to create a soft, uniform light quality and minimize
light spillage beyond the wall or sign being illuminated.
22.100.080 Safety Issues
A. Intent:
Visitors and residents should find that the development provides the best
possible design to protect their personal safety and safety of their property. The
development should consider safety issues in all aspects of design, with particular
focus on safety of pedestrians within the development as well as links to transit
and outside access to the development.
B. Standards:
1. Architectural features should be used to provide weather protection
and shade, well as highlight building features and entries.
2. Landscaping and lighting should be used to identify entrances,
pathways, public spaces and bus stops.
3. Lighting should contribute to the overall safety of the development,
and landscaping should incorporate safe-by-design standards.
4. Covered bus stops and waiting areas should be included to provide
pedestrians with outdoor areas sheltered from extreme weather conditions.
Packet Page 552 of 930
Firdale Village Site -- Design Standards -- 27
A.D. Shapiro Architects / DRAFT 02-04-09
22.100.90 Sustainable Design
A. Incentive.
In exchange for allowing four-story buildings for the multi-residential portion of
the project, the development would be required to meet the requirements for at
least a 4-star rating of the Built Green of Washington program, or the LEED
Gold Standard, with integration of sustainable design methods and technologies
throughout the project.
If the project does not include four-story buildings in the multi-family sub-
district, then the project must meet the requirement for at least a 3-star
rating of the Built Green of Washington program. Particular focus will be given
to low-impact site design strategies, water efficiency and energy efficiency
methodologies.
B. Design Goals for Project
Incorporate goals for integration of sustainability at earliest stages of
design process possible. Decide on projected levels of achievement for
the project – For example: The project will achieve at least a 4-star level
of the Built Green of Washington program
1. Site Design and Water Use
The proposed development will integrate low impact
development techniques where reasonably feasible. For the
purposes of this section, low impact development techniques
shall include, but shall not be limited to, the following: the use of
bio swales, green roofs, and grasscrete.
"Reasonably feasible" shall be determined based upon the
physical characteristics of the property and its suitability for the
technique; cost alone shall not render the use of low impact
techniques unreasonable or unfeasible.
Additional techniques for strong consideration:
Rainwater harvesting – for use in site irrigation and possibly
toilet flushing for commercial uses.
Utilization of water efficient fixtures throughout the project.
2. Energy Resources
Increase efficiency by maximizing equipment efficiency and using
control strategies. Design to reduce energy and electricity
consumption and eliminate unnecessary demand. Include use of
alternative energy resources wherever possible.
Packet Page 553 of 930
Firdale Village Site -- Design Standards -- 28
A.D. Shapiro Architects / DRAFT 02-04-09
3. Material Resources
Plan for long term use by designing for adaptability, specifying
durable materials and considering energy and maintenance needs.
elect resource efficient and recycled materials where possible,
that minimize environmental impact.
Utilize wood from sustainable sources.
Encourage recycling of waste with easy access recycling stations
and pick-up areas.
Manage construction demolition and waste with a jobsite
recycling plan.
4. Health and Indoor Air Quality
Utilize multiple strategies to limit emissions from materials
Select low VOC and non-toxic materials, paints and finishes.
Pay special attention to residential units in selection of finishes
and paints for low or no toxicity.
Sustainable stormwater mitigation and site
drainage system
Possible use of green roofs and other innovative
technologies.
Packet Page 554 of 930
Firdale Village Site -- Design Standards -- 29
A.D. Shapiro Architects / DRAFT 02-04-09
Definitions
This section will provide clarification of some of the specific terminology
used within the guidelines.
Courtyard:
A landscaped spaced enclosed on at least three sides by a structure(s).
Curb Cut:
A depression in the curb for the purpose of accommodating a driveway
that provides vehicular access between private property and the street (or
ADA/bike crossing at street corners).
Façade:
Any vertical exterior wall of a building.
Frontage:
Refers to the length of property along a public street or
right-of-way.
Landscaping:
An area is considered to be landscaped if it is:
Planted with vegetation in the form of hardy trees, shrubs, or
Grass or evergreen groundcover maintained in good condition;
or occupied by sculpture, fountains, pools, benches, or other
Outdoor furnishings; or
Occupied by recreational facilities; or
Paved with decorative pavers, brick combined with any of
the above items.
Modulation:
As used in the Design Guidelines, modulation is a stepping back, or
projecting forward of portions of a building face within specified
intervals of building width and depth, as a means of breaking up the
apparent bulk of a structure’s continuous exterior walls.
Pedestrian-Oriented Façade:
A building façade is considered “pedestrian-oriented” if it features any of
the following characteristics:
A transparent window along at least 75 percent of the ground floor
between the height of two feet and eight feet above the ground.
Frontage along a pedestrian-oriented space.
Packet Page 555 of 930
Firdale Village Site -- Design Standards -- 30
A.D. Shapiro Architects / DRAFT 02-04-09
Pedestrian-Oriented Space:
An area between a building and a public space that promotes visual and
pedestrian access to the site and provides pedestrian oriented amenities
and landscaping to enhance the public’s use of the space for passive
activities such as sitting, reading, picnicking, etc.
A “pedestrian-oriented” space must have:
Visual and pedestrian access into the site from the public
right of way;
Paved walking surfaces of either concrete or approved unit paving;
On-site or building-mounted lighting;
Seating comprised of at two feet of seating area (bench, ledge, etc.),
or one individual seat per 60 SF of plaza area or open space.
A “pedestrian-oriented” space is encouraged to have:
Site furniture, amenities such as fountains, kiosk, artwork ,
And landscaping that does not act as a visual barrier.
Human Scale:
The perceived size of a building relative to a human being.
A building is considered to have “good human scale” if there is an
expression of human activity or use that indicates the building’s size.
For example, traditionally sized doors, windows, and balconies are
elements that respond to the size of the human body, and therefore are
elements in a building that indicate a building’s overall size.
Vertical Articulation:
Visual division of a building’s façade into distinct sections or elements to
reduce the apparent horizontal length of the façade.
Packet Page 556 of 930
1
Firdale Village Site -- Design Standards
A.D. Shapiro Architects / DRAFT 12-54-08
Firdale Village
Mixed Use
Draft 12-05-08
Version 2-a
Updated with Notes about further
information and corrections.
16.100.000 Introduction
16.100.010 Purposes
16.100.020 Sub-Districts
16.100.030 Uses
16.100.040 Site Development Standards
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
16.100.000 Introduction
General Intent and Project Vision
The design vision for Firdale Village entails creating a vibrant neighborhood
village form of development that strikes a balance between commercial, retail
and residential uses and contributes to the vitality of the neighborhood and
area. The project is intended to support a variety of commercial and retail
uses along with multi-family residential in an environment that is accessible to
the pedestrian, visitor, tenant, motorist and public transit user.
16.100.010 Purposes
The Firdale Village Mixed-Use zone has the following specific purposes in
addition to the general purposes for business and commercial zones in
Chapter 16.40 ECDC.
A. To reserve and regulate areas for a ‘neighborhood center’ type of
mixed-use development that includes a mix of commercial and multi-
residential housing types, and a range of greater densities than are available in
the single family residential zone;
Packet Page 557 of 930
2
Firdale Village Site -- Design Standards
A.D. Shapiro Architects / DRAFT 12-54-08
B. To promote a mix of residential, commercial and other uses in a
manner that is consistent with the City’s comprehensive plan,
C. To provide for those additional uses which complement and are
compatible with multiple residential uses.
D. The Codes contained within this Chapter are to be used in conjunction
with the Firdale Village Design Standards in Chapter 22.100.000 ECDC.
16.100.020 Sub-Districts
See Diagram ______ for approximate location of Districts on the site.
A. District 1 – Commercial: The primary commercial uses will be
located in this district, which is located closer to Firdale Avenue and oriented
to the street.
B. District 2 – Multi-Family Residential: Multi-family residential uses
will be located more towards sides and rear of the site, behind the commercial
uses.
16.100.030 Uses
NOTE: Uses will be put into a Table format, similar to that for the BD zones.
A. Permitted Primary Uses for Commercial District 1:
1. Commercial/residential mixed use developments, providing
that ground floor is occupied by commercial uses as described
below. (Within this development, multi-family residential will
be located primarily in District 2.)
2. Offices;
3. Retail;
Smaller scale retail uses and shops;
4. Restaurants and cafes, excluding drive-in restaurants;
Packet Page 558 of 930
3
Firdale Village Site -- Design Standards
A.D. Shapiro Architects / DRAFT 12-54-08
6. Pubs and taverns;
7. Home occupations (businesses);
8. Personal and professional services;
9. Arts Related: Including theater, galleries;
10. Health care facilities;
11. Animal related services and businesses including:
Dog Day Care Centers, Animal Grooming;
12. Hotels and motels;
13. Neighborhood parks, natural open spaces, and community
parks subject to the requirements of ____________.
14. Community markets;
16. Bus stop shelters.
B. Primary Uses for District 1 – Commercial requiring a
Conditional Use Permit.
1. Convenience stores;
2. Day-care centers;
3. Drive-in businesses;
4. Amusement establishments.
C. Permitted Primary Uses for Multi-Family Residential District 2:
1. Multi-Family Residential Housing (Primary Use);
2. Home occupations (businesses);
3. Senior Housing;
4. Housing for low income elderly in accordance with the
requirements of Chapter 20.25 ECDC;
5. Small Businesses;
6. Personal and professional services;
D. Not Permitted Uses for District 1 and District 2.
1. Hospitals, convalescent homes, rest homes, sanitariums;
2. Automobile sales and service;
3. Retail sales requiring outdoor display or storage areas
such as used car lots, heavy equipment storage
sales or services;
4. Large retail stores, over _______ SF in size.
5. Light Industrial;
6. Laboratories (define further).
7. Residential treatment centers for drug and alcohol abuse.
Packet Page 559 of 930
4
Firdale Village Site -- Design Standards
A.D. Shapiro Architects / DRAFT 12-54-08
16.100.040 Development Standards
A. Development Standards – General
1. Development Requirements can be summarized as follows:
(See Sub-District Map ______ ** to be added)
NOTE: Information will be taken out of Table format and put into
paragraph form below.
Sub
districts
Minimum
Street
Setback
Minimum
Side
Setback
Minimum
Rear
Setback
Max.
# of
Stories
Max.
Height
Minimum
Parking
Spaces
District 1
Commercial
TBD 15' NA 3 stories
39’ 1/400 SF
Retail/Commercial
and Office space;
District 2 –
MF
NA 15’ 20'
(Includes
evergreen
tress in rear
of site)
4 stories 48’ base height
+ 4’ addl for
variation in
rooflines**
1 dedicated
space per Unit –
secured; plus
shared Parking –
Office/
Commercial
space* * See explanation below in Minimum Parking Section
** See section on Maximum Building Height below
B. Building Scale and Building Height
1. Intent: To provide a consistency of architectural scale for different
sections of the development:
The more commercial/retail area closer to Firdale Avenue shall be
lower in scale than the multi-family buildings oriented to the rear
of the site.
Building Height:
Commercial/Office/Retail: One (1) 1 – three (2) 3 stories.
Minimum height: 20 feet; Maximum height 39 feet.
Multi-family Residential: Maximum -- 4 stories.
Maximum height: 48 feet – base height with
possibility of an additional 4 feet to allow for
variation in rooflines -- to a maximum of 52 feet.
(Add further description and diagram to illustrate).
Packet Page 560 of 930
5
Firdale Village Site -- Design Standards
A.D. Shapiro Architects / DRAFT 12-54-08
2. Maximum Height (District 2 -- MF District):
A maximum of 52’ is permissible to allow for variation in
rooflines.
A base height maximum of 48’ is allowed, with an additional
allowance of 4 feet to allow for roofline variation and sloping
rooflines. (Add further description)
3. Mechanical equipment and Elevator shaft and/or /Stairway
penthouse shafts may extend above this maximum up to ten feet
(10’) above the roof.
(Add 5’ for mechanical; 10’ for Elevator/Stairways shaft).
4. Calculation of Building Height.
Building height is the vertical distance measured from the average
building elevation to the highest point of the roof structure.
This does not include rooftop mechanical equipment.
C. Parking Standards
NOTE: Delete
1. Parking: Minimum Spaces Required
Retail/Commercial including office and restaurant uses:
Provide one space for every 400 SF.
A certain portion of parking places designated for office space
must also be shared with multi-family residential uses, and be
easily accessible to multi-family residential units.
A legal agreement will be worked out that is acceptable to the
City of Edmonds. (Check on language).
2. Parking: Minimum Spaces Required
Multi-Family Uses:
Provide 1.5 spaces per unit. Additional parking for residential
units would be provided in a shared parking area for
office/commercial and residential. In addition, provide .10 spaces
per units for Guest Parking.
NOTE: Clarify language related to shared parking between
residential and commercial uses.
A legal agreement will be worked out that is acceptable to the
City of Edmonds. (Check on language).
Packet Page 561 of 930
6
Firdale Village Site -- Design Standards
A.D. Shapiro Architects / DRAFT 12-54-08
3. A legal agreement describing terms of the shared parking
arrangement shall be required between the property owners
describing the joint use of the parking areas, and would require
approval by the planning jurisdiction. (Check on language)
D. Site Setbacks/Buffers
NOTE: A diagram in plan form will be added to illustrate more
clearly the proposed setbacks and buffers.
See Development Standards, 16.100.040, A. Table 1 above.
1. Minimum Side setbacks are 15 feet.
2. The minimum setback on the rear of the site (northern boundary)
is 20 feet. This buffer includes protection of the existing
evergreen trees which will help to serve as a buffer between the
development and adjacent residential uses.
E. Tree Retention and Buffer on North Boundary
NOTE: A diagram will be added to illustrate.
The project site plan shall retain the existing stand of evergreen trees at
the north end of the site, to help serve as a buffer between the new
buildings and the residential parcels bordering the project.
The buffer area (setback) on the north boundary of the site shall not be
less than 20’ feet in the area designated as buffer with trees.
Additional significant trees in other areas of the site shall be
considered for retaining. (Show on Diagram described above)
F. Open Space
1. Design Intent: The project shall include a comprehensive open
space network that uses courtyards and other open space elements
to connect the residential and commercial uses.
2. Open Space Requirements:
Minimum open space requirement for the development:
20% of total site area.
The minimum open space requirement may include all developed
pedestrian areas including landscaped walkways, plazas,
courtyards and other passive open spaces in the commercial area.
The calculation may also include public open space for the
residential uses. The calculation shall not include private open
space for residential uses, parking areas, driveways, service areas,
setbacks or other buffer areas.
Packet Page 562 of 930
7
Firdale Village Site -- Design Standards
A.D. Shapiro Architects / DRAFT 12-54-08
Packet Page 563 of 930
1
Firdale Village Site -- Design Standards
A.D. Shapiro Architects / DRAFT 12-05-08
Firdale Village Site
Design Standards
Draft 12-05-08
Index
22.100.000 Applicability and Goals
22.100.010 Site Design and Planning
22.100.020 Architectural Design
22.100.030 Pedestrian Orientation, Outdoor Spaces & Amenities
22.100.040 Vehicular Access and Parking
22.100.050 Site Landscaping & Screening Elements
22.100.060 Signage
22.100.070 Site Lighting
22.100.080 Safety Issues
22.100.090 Sustainable Design
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
22.100.000 Applicability and Goals
A. Applicability
The design standards in this chapter apply to all development within the
Firdale Village ____ zone, including the sub-districts contained within the larger
zone.
The Design Standards use imperative language such as “shall” and “must” to
indicate high priority features and a strong directive toward satisfying the
‘Standards’ intent. Words such as “should” and “may” indicate desirable
conditions or elements that are strongly encouraged.
Packet Page 564 of 930
2
Firdale Village Site -- Design Standards
A.D. Shapiro Architects / DRAFT 12-05-08
B . Goals and Intent
The Design Standards will help to shape a neighborhood village form of
development, a place of complementary uses within an aesthetically attractive,
easily accessible and economically healthy environment. The guidelines and
standards will be used to create an attractive, inviting environment for residential
and commercial uses, with an emphasis on the needs of the pedestrian, including
the needs of senior citizens, youths and physically challenged persons, but that is
also accessible for vehicles.
Development should be located to facilitate transit and non-motorized travel
modes. On-site facilities that are convenient and attractive to pedestrians,
bicyclists and vehicles are encouraged. The development will be designed to
include the following uses, and will also evolve and change over time:
Retail shops and stores, professional offices, restaurants, services, multi-
residential and community related outdoor areas and facilities.
C. Project Vision
1. Scale and Form -- The vision for Firdale Village is the creation of a
vibrant neighborhood village development that demonstrates a balance between
commercial, retail and residential uses and contributes to the vitality of the
neighborhood and area. The project is intended to create an environment that is
accessible and inviting to the pedestrian, visitor, tenant, motorist and public
transit user. The project can also be an important example of a more sustainable
form of development, one that incorporates sustainable design strategies and
methods in many aspects of the project, from site design, construction to long
term water and energy efficiency.
New development should include pedestrian amenities that bring residents and
customers to the development, including local shopping, services, offices,
specialty retail, restaurants, and other related uses. Outdoor spaces should
function as social settings for a variety of experiences, while maintaining a human
scale and ability for easy pedestrian circulation.
22.100 .010 Site Design and Planning
A. Intent
1. The project design shall respond to special opportunities and
constraints of the site, including solar orientation, changes in topography,
preservation of existing trees as buffer, and opportunities for low impact site
design.
Packet Page 565 of 930
3
Firdale Village Site -- Design Standards
A.D. Shapiro Architects / DRAFT 12-05-08
2. The project design shall take advantage of the southern solar
orientation for multi-family residential orientation and outdoor courtyards as well
as designing adequate usable open space and landscaped areas in both private
residential and commercial sub-districts. The project should also respond to
other local climatic and ecological context by incorporating the site’s natural
systems including significant trees, hydrology and geology into design solutions.
3. In general, the designer should consider the site design as a whole in
helping to create an inviting environment for residents, tenants and visitors. In
order to clarify possibilities for sustainable design, goals for sustainability and
green technologies shall be set in the initial stages of project design.
B. Site Features
1. Pedestrian Orientation.
The project shall include a pedestrian orientation with public amenities, such as
buildings with ground floor orientation to the streetscape and public spaces,
pedestrian walkways, street trees, attractive landscaping, outdoor areas with
seating and other amenities, and places for gathering. Additional amenities in
public spaces such as fountains, sculpture or other forms of art are highly
encouraged. (See Pedestrian Orientation section for more description).
The use of materials, color, texture, form and massing, proportion, public
amenities, landscaping and vegetation along with mitigation of environmental
impacts, should be incorporated in the design of the project with the purpose of
supporting a human scale, pedestrian-oriented development.
2. Tree Retention -- The project site plan shall retain the existing stand of
evergreen trees at the north end of the site, to help serve as a buffer between the
new buildings and the residential parcels bordering the project. See Zoning
Code _____ for further information.
C. Open Space – Design Intent:
The project shall include a comprehensive open space network that uses
courtyards and other open space elements to connect the residential and
commercial uses.
1. The design and layout of required plazas, courtyards and other public
gathering spaces should contribute to the overall sense of place and help attract
pedestrian users to the development. The project should be designed in such a
way to allow some views into the public plazas and open space from Firdale
Avenue, to help create an inviting and welcoming ambiance from outside the
development. It is important to achieve a balance between creating inviting,
usable public spaces and buffering noise and other traffic issues from Firdale
Avenue. A more transparent configuration, that allows views from the street
into the development, will also help create an inviting ambiance and make
visible the pedestrian friendly character of the development
Packet Page 566 of 930
4
Firdale Village Site -- Design Standards
A.D. Shapiro Architects / DRAFT 12-05-08
2. Open Space Requirements:
Minimum open space requirement for the development:
20% of total site area.
The minimum open space requirement may include all developed
pedestrian areas including landscaped walkways, plazas, courtyards and
other passive open spaces in the commercial area. The calculation may
also include public open space for the residential uses. The calculation
shall not include private open space for residential uses, parking areas,
driveways, service areas, setbacks or other buffer areas.
3.. Residential Open Space:
Residential Development should include private open space or outdoor areas for
residents. These areas should be configured and designed so as to ensure privacy
for residential uses while also providing linkages to the public open space
components of the project. Seating areas should be provided as an important
part of the usable open spaces, and coordinated with landscaping, shaded areas,
lighting and orientation to focal points.
22.100 .020 Architectural Design
A. Design Intent
To create a unified design concept for the project that reflects the neighborhood
village form of development, while allowing for some individual expression of
each building. The massing, layout and individual design of each building should
be compatible with its neighboring buildings, yet complement the neighborhood
village character. In general, all aspects of the project, from landscaped open
spaces to project signage should be well-designed and coordinated with the
project as a whole.
1. Scale.
The designers shall consider how the structure and site development
will be viewed from the street and adjacent properties. Scale is not simply the
size of the buildings, it is the proportion of buildings in relationship to each
other, to the street and to the pedestrian environment. Because of the bowl-like
topography, the larger scale buildings will be toward the side and rear of the site,
with lower scale commercial buildings toward Firdale Avenue.
Packet Page 567 of 930
5
Firdale Village Site -- Design Standards
A.D. Shapiro Architects / DRAFT 12-05-08
2. Form and Style.
The objectives and standards do not set a particular style of
architecture or design theme. The style and site design shall be pedestrian in scale
and address design features such as distinctive building shapes; incorporation of
a number of design elements on building facades, with particular focus on
ground floor, integration of art; interesting textures and patterns; treatment of
public spaces; landscaping; and signage.
Building forms shall not present visual mass or bulk impacts that are out of
proportion to the adjoining structures, or that appear from the street or sidewalk
as having unmodulated visual mass or bulk. Building additions should
complement the original structure in design
B. Architectural Character
1. Building Siting and Orientation
a. Where feasible, primary commercial buildings should be oriented
to the street frontage to enliven the street edge as well as to
maximize access from the public sidewalk. Because not all of the
commercial space will be oriented towards Firdale Avenue,
primary entrances may also be oriented to side streets or towards
a rear courtyard as the site design warrants.
b. All visible building frontages and ground floor
commercial spaces should be detailed with architectural elements.
(See Building Facades, below).
c. Commercial uses are located towards the front of the site, with
orientation towards Firdale Avenue. Residential uses are located
towards the rear of the site to allow for greater privacy and
buffering from street noise and activity.
2. Building Articulation
a. In order to prevent long stretches of monotonous facades,
bildings over 100 feet in length as measured parallel to a roadway
or public open space shall be vertically articulated along the
façade at regular intervals.
b. Articulation may be accomplished in several ways, including:
Modulation – the stepping back of projection of a portion of the
façade, including significant building elements such as balconies,
porches, canopies, entry areas, etc. that visually break up the
façade. Articulation can also be accomplished through
adding building focal points which include distinctive entry
features, changing the roofline and changing materials.
Packet Page 568 of 930
6
Firdale Village Site -- Design Standards
A.D. Shapiro Architects / DRAFT 12-05-08
3. Building Facades
a. Objectives.
Building facades should be designed with a variety of
architectural elements that suggest the buildings’ use and provide
visual interest to residents and pedestrians. Special focus should
be given to mass, scale roof forms and landscaping, with special
attention to the ground floor of retail and commercial buildings.
b. Street-facing and major Façade Elements:
All major mixed-use, commercial and/or retail buildings within
the development shall include at least six (6) of the following
elements on the major facades, (to be defined) with at least five
(5) elements on the ground floor.
(1) Window and doors treatments which embellish the
façade.
(2) Unique façade treatment, such as decorative materials
and design elements.
(3) Decorative light fixtures.
(4) Decorative paving.
(5) Recessed entrances.
(6) Balconies.
(7) Railings, gill work, gates
(8) Unique landscaping.
(9) Belt courses.
(10) Decorative tile work.
(11) Projecting metal and glass canopy
(12) Clerestories over storefront windows.
c. Walls
Blank walls without visual or architectural interest shall be
avoided. Buildings shall provide massing breaks along wall
expanses and walls shall include visual or architectural treatments.
Walls facing the sidewalk or other pedestrian spaces should be
treated with recesses, landscaping, windows, seating, recessed
secondary entrances, balconies, belt courses, cornices, and other
means of breaking up the blank wall surface.
d. Ground Floor Windows and Doors
Major commercial buildings should have at least 75 percent of
the length of the ground floor façade between the height of two
feet and seven feet devoted to windows and doors affording
views into retail, office or lobby space.
Packet Page 569 of 930
7
Firdale Village Site -- Design Standards
A.D. Shapiro Architects / DRAFT 12-05-08
e. Transparent Facades
Major commercial building facades should have a high degree of
transparency into the first floor offices/retail to help create a
more inviting ambiance. See section on Ground floor windows
and doors.
f. Upper Story Facades
Upper stories of buildings above two stories should maintain an
expression line along the façade such as a setback, change of
material, or a projection to reduce the perceived building mass.
Upper-story features should include but are not limited to
balconies, roof decks, or bay windows.
g. Long Buildings
Long buildings, more than 50 feet in length, shall provide relief to
perceived building mass through such features as varied setback
or heights, or projecting windows, entrances or walls.
Long linear walls should be staggered horizontally and vertically
to provide interest.
h. Entrances
Building entrances should concentrate along the sidewalk and
should be physically and visually inviting. Entrance doors should
be recessed from the façade surface to emphasize the entrance
and provide a sheltered transition to the interior of the building.
Special paving treatments may be used to enhance the entry.
i. Pedestrian walkways
Pedestrian walkways should be a minimum of eight (8) feet wide,
and be landscaped appropriately. Wheelchair ramps should be
constructed between the sidewalk and building entrances.
j Building Facades Oriented towards Residential Aareas.
Building facades facing north towards the single family residential
areas shall be designed to include elements to create an
interesting architectural expression as opposed to blank walls.
Elements shall include those associated with multi-family
residences such as balconies, roof decks, or bay windows, along
with modulation of building facades. .
Packet Page 570 of 930
8
Firdale Village Site -- Design Standards
A.D. Shapiro Architects / DRAFT 12-05-08
4. Materials and Color
a. Objectives:
The buildings should include textured high quality materials and
colors and provide a visually interesting experience. Color should
be carefully considered in relation to the overall project design.
Color and materials should highlight architectural elements such
as doors, windows, fascias, cornices, lintels, sills and pedestrian
amenities.
b. Development and Design Standards:
Building Exteriors: shall be constructed from high quality and
durable materials, that will require minimal maintenance.
Color: A harmonious range of colors should be used on all
buildings. Bright colors should be used only for trim and accents.
22.100.030 Pedestrian Orientation, Outdoor Spaces & Amenities
A. Design Intent:
The project should incorporate a network of well designed, attractive
pedestrian spaces throughout the project. The commercial area will feature
various sizes of public spaces, completed with outdoor furnishings and
amenities to help create a safe, inviting environment for visitors and residents.
B. Pedestrian Connections
1. Attractive well-marked pedestrian links between parking and
buildings shall be provided. The connections shall be designed to enhance
pedestrian safety through clearly marked walkways across traffic lanes,
landscaped areas and parking lots.
2. Where walkways cross driveways and traffic lanes, special features
should be used to increase safety for pedestrians. Potential features include
raised or textured pavement to define the pedestrian space, raised curbs, curb
extensions or low-level lighting such as bollard lights.
3. Pedestrian connections should be provided between buildings with
special focus on connections between residential and commercial areas.
4. Pedestrian connections should include design cues to help demarcate
the transition between public and private spaces. Design cues may include a
change in materials, colors, landscaping or the dimensions of the space.
5. Illumination of walkways should be concentrated along the
pedestrian paths leading to parking areas and in the specific areas where cars are
parked.
6. Walkways should be landscaped where feasible.
7. The project shall include at least one pedestrian pathway through the
parking area(s) to the main entrance from the street.
Packet Page 571 of 930
9
Firdale Village Site -- Design Standards
A.D. Shapiro Architects / DRAFT 12-05-08
C. Pedestrian Amenities -- Commercial and public areas:
1. Pedestrian amenities such as street trees, landscaping, and seasonal
flowers, benches, lighting, banners and possibly artwork shall be provided to
create interest along walkways, courtyards and other pedestrian oriented spaces.
2. All public open spaces, walkways, and sidewalks shall meet ADA
standards.
3. The addition of texture to the ground plane of sidewalks and plazas
with unit pavers, bricks, tiles or public artwork is strongly encouraged.
4. Safe public walkways around and through parking areas shall be
provided as an important part of the site layout and design. (See B1-6 above).
5. Awnings, arcades, pergolas, and/or overhangs should be provided to
protect pedestrians from inclement weather whenever possible.
6. Pedestrian amenities and detailing of site furniture, lighting, paving,
and site amenities should be consistent throughout the development to help
create a recognizable identity and image.
7. Separate areas should be provided for active and passive activities.
8. Residential buildings should provide an easily accessible gathering
space for building occupants and their guests. Examples include an upper level
or roof-top patio area or an at-grade courtyard.
D. Pedestrian Oriented Spaces
1. Mixed-use areas shall emphasize pedestrian orientation by
incorporating features such as plazas, interior walkways, outdoor courtyards,
outdoor seating areas, fountains, outdoor street furniture and other similar
elements.
2. Outdoor Spaces
A variety of outdoor spaces shall be provided, including patios,
courtyards, plazas and other landscaped open spaces, which should be
proportionate in size to the development.
a. Courtyards:
(1) An outdoor covered or uncovered area easily accessible to
the public at the same level as the public sidewalk or
pedestrian connections which should:
Be at least 8 feet in width, with a building façade on at least
one side; and minimum area of 100 SF.
Be landscaped with groundcover, shrubs, trees or other
landscaping over 25% of its area.
The design should include seating, special paving material,
pedestrian-scale lighting and other pedestrian furnishings;
(2) Minimum number of courtyards: three (3) separate
courtyards with minimum dimensions above.
Packet Page 572 of 930
10
Firdale Village Site -- Design Standards
A.D. Shapiro Architects / DRAFT 12-05-08
b. Plazas, Mini-plazas, Squares and other open spaces
Public plazas and other gathering areas should be provided to
encourage community activity in open spaces, particularly at the
edges that relate to building openings, natural features, or
activities. Public plazas and gathering areas shall be of sufficient
size to encourage passive gathering activity and permit
permanent/temporary seating and shall incorporate other
elements as described:
(1) There shall be pedestrian linkages leading to and from the
plazas to natural features and other pedestrian paths.
(2) A plaza should have an articulated edge (buildings, benches,
landscaping, etc.) where feasible to provide visual interest and
additional seating along the edges of the plaza where people may
linger out of the pedestrian traffic flow.
(3) Amenities shall be provided such as seating, lighting, plants,
drinking fountains, distinctive paving, art work, bicycle racks or
structures (either open or covered); and such focal points as a
sculpture or water feature.
(4) Color, form and texture are integral to the overall design
of the plaza. Design of the plaza should incorporate some soft as
well as hard surface areas.
(5) Minimum size of mini-plaza -- 1000 SF
(6) Minimum number of plazas – two (2)
(1). One (1) at least 1,000 SF, and one larger plaza
See below.
(2). One larger plaza as a primary open space with focal
point(s) shall be provided in the commercial area.
c. Configuration and Linking of Outdoor Spaces.
Where possible, smaller outdoor spaces, including
courtyards and plazas shall be designed to be adjacent to
another outdoor space to increase the size and usability of
outdoor spaces.
Where possible, several outdoor spaces should be linked to
help create a mini-park or usable outdoor space, complete
with landscaping, planters, pedestrian oriented furnishings
and other amenities. The intention is to provide both
usable smaller outdoor spaces, and larger plazas that can
help to provide a larger, more park-like open space or public
square that can be utilized for outdoor event, gatherings or
community type market.
Packet Page 573 of 930
11
Firdale Village Site -- Design Standards
A.D. Shapiro Architects / DRAFT 12-05-08
d. Residential Balconies and Decks
Upper story decks, and balconies as private open space should
also be incorporated for residential use. Balconies should be
appropriately scaled and incorporated into the overall design of
the building. The designer should consider environmental
conditions such as sun, shade, and prevailing winds when
designing outdoor spaces including courtyards, decks, balconies
other usable open spaces.
E. Dedicated Public Meeting Space
The project shall provide a public meeting room shall be provided
of not less than 1,000 SF, with at least one wall with windows to the
outside, within the commercial section of the project.
Preferably, the room should be located adjacent to a courtyard or
other usable public outdoor spaces or plazas, so as to be easily
located and accessible to the public. The property manager/owner
shall provide access to the room on a reservation basis, and provide
custodial service for the space on a regular basis.
In addition, a restaurant or coffee shop may provide a meeting
room adjacent to a primary dining room as an amenity, and may
determine rules of access and reservation of the space.
22.100.040 Vehicular Access and Parking
A. Parking Layout and Design
1. Parking should be located on the sides, to the rear of projects or
below grade with pedestrian connections between the parking areas and the
commercial and/or residential buildings.
2. Building siting and parking design should maximize opportunities for
pedestrian and vehicular circulation between adjacent buildings or subdistricts,
such as joint access easements and common driveways. The layout should limit
the conflict between pedestrians and cars to the greatest extent possible.
B. Access Drives
Building siting and parking design should maximize opportunities for
shared parking, access entries and driveways in order to minimize the number of
curb cuts. This will help to limit possible conflicts between pedestrians and
vehicles entering and leaving the parking area.
Packet Page 574 of 930
12
Firdale Village Site -- Design Standards
A.D. Shapiro Architects / DRAFT 12-05-08
C. Vehicular Entrances and Driveways
The site plan should allow maximum of three (3) access points from
Firdale Avenue to the project.
22.100.050 Site Landscaping & Screening Elements
A. General Landscaping
Site landscaping should be designed to achieve the project vision as described in
Section A. Trees and landscaping shall be incorporated into the site design in
order to provide a more attractive overall pedestrian oriented environment and
to soften and screen the visual impact of hard surfaces such as parking lots,
service areas, walkways and gathering places. Outdoor furniture should be
compatible with the project architecture and should be carefully considered as
integral elements of the landscape.
1. A range of landscape materials, trees, evergreen shrubs, groundcovers
and seasonal flowers shall be provided for color and visual interest.
2. Trees should be placed to allow southern sun exposure in such a
manner as not to conflict with pedestrian activity areas. (For this reason trees
with a fine leaf texture are also preferred in the plaza.)
3. Planters or large pots with small shrubs and seasonal flowers may
also be used to separate café seating from traffic flow and create protected sub-
areas within the plaza for sitting and people watching.
4. Creative use of plant materials such as climbing vines or trellises, and
use of sculpture groupings, etc. are also encouraged.
5. Native and drought tolerant plants should be used where possible.
A minimum of 20% of all landscaped areas should include native drought
tolerant plants.
6. Sun angle at noon and wind pattern should be considered in the
design of the open space and courtyards to maximize sunlight areas.
7. Recommended materials include: brick, concrete, unit pavers, tile,
stone and wood (some seating).
8. No dumpsters or service areas shall be adjacent to open space.
9. Public restrooms should be located nearby in an accessible public
space.
B. Landscaping – Parking Lots
1. Parking areas shall be screened from pedestrian-oriented areas
through the use of trees, shrubs, walls and/or trellis structures with
plants.
Packet Page 575 of 930
13
Firdale Village Site -- Design Standards
A.D. Shapiro Architects / DRAFT 12-05-08
2. Parking lots shall provide landscaping next to buildings and along
walkways. Landscape beds within parking lots should have a 90%
ground coverage in five years.
3. Parking areas shall have one tree per every 10 parking stalls.
C. Screening Elements
Intent: To minimize the negative visual impacts of service and
storage elements (ie. waste receptacles, loading docks), to the street and
pedestrian environment.
1. On-site Service Areas.
All on-site service areas, loading zones, outdoor storage areas, garbage collection
and recycling areas should be located in an area not visible from public streets or
important pedestrian areas of the site. These areas should be enclosed and
screened around their perimeter by a wall or fence at least seven feet high.
Service areas should be located and designed for easy access by service vehicles
and for convenient access by each tenant.
2. Service elements shall be located and designed to minimize the
impacts of the pedestrian environment and adjacent uses. Service elements
should generally by concentrated and located where they are accessible to service
vehicles and convenient for tenant use.
3. Roof-mounted mechanical equipment, meters and similar structures
and other similar elements shall be located so as not be visible from the street,
public open space, parking areas, or from the ground level of adjacent properties.
Screening features should blend with the adjacent buildings and project as a
whole.
22.100.060 Signage
A. Design Intent:
To encourage signage that is clear, attractive and of an appropriate
scale for the project.
To provide consistent design criteria for the entire project.
To enhance the visual qualities of signage through the use of
complementary sizes, colors and methods of illumination.
To provide signage guidelines that meet commercial tenant needs.
. General Signage
Types of signage fall into several categories:
Tenant Signs (large and small), Site Entry Markers and Identification
Signs, Wayfinding signage, and Environmental Graphic Design
Elements
Packet Page 576 of 930
14
Firdale Village Site -- Design Standards
A.D. Shapiro Architects / DRAFT 12-05-08
B. Design Standards
1. Signage must be of a high quality of design and materials, consistent
with the design of the project. Signage shall be consistent throughout the project
and always complement a building’s character.
2. Signage should be designed as an integral element of the building’s
Architecture. Wall and blade signs should not interfere with Architectural details
or disrupt the rhythm of windows.
3. Signage should make a positive contribution to the overall visual
character of the streetscape. Signs should be appropriately sized with the scale of
the building. Materials and colors used in the construction of signs should be
compatible with the overall design of the site.
4. Signs may be fabricated of mixed-media, including metal reverse-
illuminated letters, suspended neon letters, illuminated individual letters, signs
etched or cutout of solid materials such as wood or brass and illuminated from
behind.
5. Internally illuminated boxes with formed or painted lettering are not
permitted. Large internally illuminated boxes that serve as monument signs are
not permitted.
6. Instead, larger signs of wood or other non-transparent or
translucent material are allowed that have exterior sources of illumination
(as opposed to internal). Monument signs constructed from plastic or
plastic-like material are not allowed. However, monument signs that
provide primary development identification (project name) constructed
from materials such as wood, metal or other durable materials are allowed.
Packet Page 577 of 930
15
Firdale Village Site -- Design Standards
A.D. Shapiro Architects / DRAFT 12-05-08
7. ‘Wayfinding signage.’ The project shall include a coordinated
system of signs to aid in visitor orientation and navigation through the
project.
22.100.070 Site Lighting
A. Objectives.
Lighting shall be an integral part of all components of the development.
Lighting shall contribute to the individuality, security and safety of the
site design without having overpowering effects on the adjacent areas.
Lighting is viewed as an important feature, for functional and security
purposes, as well as to enhance the streetscape and public spaces.
1. The design of light fixtures and their structural support should be
integrated with the architectural theme and style of the main structures
on the site, and with landscaping.
2. Pedestrian scale lighting (maximum 15’ height) and/or bollard
lighting shall be used to define pedestrian walkways, connections and
other pedestrian areas within the development.
3. Along walkways, low level lighting that directs light downward onto
the ground surface is encouraged. The design of the fixtures shall be
compatible with the overall design of the development, and shatterproof
lamp coverings will be used. The fixtures will be placed to minimize
glare and shall be located as to not present hazards for pedestrians or
vehicles.
4. All lighting shall be shielded from the sky and adjacent properties and
structures, either through exterior shields or through optics within the
fixture. Light should not spill out onto surrounding properties or project
above the horizontal plan. Warm lighting colors are encouraged.
5. Within parking lots, a minimum foot candle of (1.0) at the perimeter
of light sources and between light sources, and 5.0 under light fixtures is
recommended. Light shall not exceed 0.5 foot candles at any property
line.
6. Wall mounted lights shall be directed downward. Soffit mounted
light fixtures should be recessed in the soffit or otherwise fully shielded
from any property line. Ground mounted or other upward directional
lighting will be permitted only where some form of shielding or light
baffling is provided to create a soft, uniform light quality and minimize
light spillage beyond the wall or sign being illuminated.
Packet Page 578 of 930
16
Firdale Village Site -- Design Standards
A.D. Shapiro Architects / DRAFT 12-05-08
22.100.080 Safety Issues
A. Intent:
Visitors and residents should find that the development provides the best
possible design to protect their personal safety and safety of their property. The
development should consider safety issues in all aspects of design, with particular
focus on safety of pedestrians within the development as well as links to transit
and outside access to the development.
B. Standards:
1. Architectural features should be used to provide weather protection
and shade, well as highlight building features and entries.
2. Landscaping and lighting should be used to identify entrances,
pathways, public spaces and bus stops.
3. Covered bus stops and waiting areas should be included to provide
pedestrians with outdoor areas sheltered from extreme weather conditions.
4. Lighting should contribute to the overall safety of the development,
and landscaping should incorporate safe-by-design standards.
22.100.90 Sustainable Design
A. Incentive.
In exchange for allowing four-story buildings for the multi-residential
portion of the project, the development would be required to meet the
requirements for at least a 4-star rating of the Built Green of Washington
program, or the LEED Gold Standard, with integration of sustainable
design methods and technologies throughout the project. If the project does
not include four-story buildings in the multi-family subdistrict, then the
project must meet the requirement for at least a 3-star rating of the Built
Green of Washington program.
Particular focus will be given to low-impact site design strategies, water efficiency
and energy efficiency methodologies.
Packet Page 579 of 930
17
Firdale Village Site -- Design Standards
A.D. Shapiro Architects / DRAFT 12-05-08
1. Design Goals for Project
Incorporate goals for integration of sustainability at earliest stages of
design process possible. Decide on projected levels of achievement
for the project – For example: The project will achieve at least a 4-
star level of the Built Green of Washington program
2. Site Design and Water Use
The proposed development will integrate low impact
development techniques where reasonably feasible. For the
purposes of this section, low impact development techniques
shall include, but shall not be limited to, the following: the use of
bio swales, green roofs, and grasscrete. "Reasonably feasible"
shall be determined based upon the physical characteristics of
the property and its suitability for the technique; cost alone shall
not render the use of low impact techniques unreasonable or
unfeasible. Additional techniques for strong consideration:
Rainwater harvesting – for use in site irrigation and possibly
toilet flushing for commercial uses.
Utilization of water efficient fixtures throughout the project.
3. Energy Resources
Increase efficiency by maximizing equipment efficiency and using
control strategies. Design to reduce energy and electricity
consumption and eliminate unnecessary demand. Include use of
alternative energy resources wherever possible.
4. Material Resources
Plan for long term use by designing for adaptability, specifying
durable materials and considering energy and maintenance needs.
elect resource efficient and recycled materials where possible,
that minimize environmental impact.
Utilize wood from sustainable sources.
Encourage recycling of waste with easy access recycling stations
and pick-up areas.
Manage construction demolition and waste with a jobsite
recycling plan.
5. Health and Indoor Air Quality
Utilize multiple strategies to limit emissions from materials
Select low VOC and non-toxic materials, paints and finishes.
Pay special attention to residential units in selection of finishes
and paints for low or no toxicity.
Packet Page 580 of 930
18
Firdale Village Site -- Design Standards
A.D. Shapiro Architects / DRAFT 12-05-08
Example: Building illustrating several elements of pedestrian-oriented
design
Packet Page 581 of 930
19
Firdale Village Site -- Design Standards
A.D. Shapiro Architects / DRAFT 12-05-08
Definitions
This section will provide clarification of some of the specific terminology
used within the guidelines.
Courtyard:
A landscaped spaced enclosed on at least three sides by a structure(s).
Curb Cut:
A depression in the curb for the purpose of accommodating a driveway
that provides vehicular access between private property and the street (or
ADA/bike crossing at street corners).
Façade:
Any vertical exterior wall of a building.
Frontage:
Refers to the length of property along a public street or
right-of-way.
Landscaping:
An area is considered to be landscaped if it is:
Planted with vegetation in the form of hardy trees, shrubs, or
Grass or evergreen groundcover maintained in good condition;
or occupied by sculpture, fountains, pools, benches, or other
Outdoor furnishings; or
Occupied by recreational facilities; or
Paved with decorative pavers, brick combined with any of
the above items.
Modulation:
As used in the Design Guidelines, modulation is a stepping back, or
projecting forward of portions of a building face within specified
intervals of building width and depth, as a means of breaking up the
apparent bulk of a structure’s continuous exterior walls.
Pedestrian-Oriented Façade:
A building façade is considered “pedestrian-oriented” if it features any of
the following characteristics:
A transparent window along at least 75 percent of the ground floor
between the height of two feet and eight feet above the ground.
Frontage along a pedestrian-oriented space.
Packet Page 582 of 930
20
Firdale Village Site -- Design Standards
A.D. Shapiro Architects / DRAFT 12-05-08
Pedestrian-Oriented Space:
An area between a building and a public space that promotes visual and
pedestrian access to the site and provides pedestrian oriented amenities
and landscaping to enhance the public’s use of the space for passive
activities such as sitting, reading, picnicking, etc.
A “pedestrian-oriented” space must have:
Visual and pedestrian access into the site from the public
right of way;
Paved walking surfaces of either concrete or approved unit paving;
On-site or building-mounted lighting;
Seating comprised of at two feet of seating area (bench, ledge, etc.),
or one individual seat per 60 SF of plaza area or open space.
A “pedestrian-oriented” space is encouraged to have:
Site furniture, amenities such as fountains, kiosk, artwork ,
And landscaping that does not act as a visual barrier.
Human Scale:
The perceived size of a building relative to a human being.
A building is considered to have “good human scale” if there is an
expression of human activity or use that indicates the building’s size.
For example, traditionally sized doors, windows, and balconies are
elements that respond to the size of the human body, and therefore are
elements in a building that indicate a building’s overall size.
Vertical Articulation:
Visual division of a building’s façade into distinct sections or elements to
reduce the apparent horizontal length of the façade.
Packet Page 583 of 930
Pl
a
n
n
i
n
g
B
o
a
r
d
Wo
r
k
S
e
s
s
i
o
n
Fi
r
d
a
l
e
V
i
l
l
a
g
e
R
e
z
o
n
e
&
D
e
s
i
g
n
G
u
i
d
e
l
i
n
e
s
Pa
r
k
i
n
g
Bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
H
e
i
g
h
t
Si
g
n
a
g
e
R
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
Op
e
n
S
p
a
c
e
R
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
Fi
r
d
a
l
e
A
s
s
o
c
i
a
t
e
s
A.
D
.
S
h
a
p
i
r
o
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
s
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
58
4
of
93
0
Pa
r
k
i
n
g
R
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
:
Mi
n
i
m
u
m
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
r
a
t
i
o
o
f
1
pa
r
k
i
n
g
p
l
a
c
e
p
e
r
d
w
e
l
l
i
n
g
un
i
t
.
En
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
t
r
a
n
s
i
t
al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
s
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
58
5
of
93
0
Co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
/
R
e
t
a
i
l
ma
i
n
t
a
i
n
s
o
r
a
r
e
a
t
sl
i
g
h
t
l
y
h
i
g
h
e
r
s
t
d
s
t
h
a
n
cu
r
r
e
n
t
C
o
d
e
3-
4
s
t
a
l
l
s
p
e
r
1
,
0
0
0
s
f
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
58
6
of
93
0
Ot
h
e
r
s
i
m
i
l
a
r
g
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
r
e
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
s
Ne
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
b
a
s
e
d
re
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
:
U.
V
i
l
l
a
g
e
Ca
p
i
t
o
l
H
i
l
l
S.
L
a
k
e
U
n
i
o
n
Se
a
t
t
l
e
M
U
R
e
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
s
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
58
7
of
93
0
Ot
h
e
r
g
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
r
e
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
s
WS
D
O
T
Sa
n
D
i
e
g
o
,
C
A
Sc
o
t
t
s
d
a
l
e
,
A
Z
(w
e
w
i
l
l
s
u
p
p
l
y
t
h
e
l
i
n
k
s
t
o
th
e
s
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
f
o
r
y
o
u
r
re
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
)
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
58
8
of
93
0
Bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
H
e
i
g
h
t
Co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
-
R
e
t
a
i
l
Z
o
n
e
3
s
t
o
r
i
e
s
&
3
9
’
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
58
9
of
93
0
Ma
x
i
m
u
m
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
H
e
i
g
h
t
Mi
x
e
d
U
s
e
/
H
o
u
s
i
n
g
4
s
t
o
r
i
e
s
4
8
’
+
4
’
h
e
i
g
h
t
bo
n
u
s
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
59
0
of
93
0
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
59
1
of
93
0
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
59
2
of
93
0
Si
g
n
a
g
e
St
r
e
e
t
F
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
Lo
w
“
g
r
o
u
n
d
m
o
u
n
t
e
d
”
si
g
n
a
g
e
Vi
s
u
a
l
l
i
n
k
t
o
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
t
h
e
m
e
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
59
3
of
93
0
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
59
4
of
93
0
Si
g
n
a
g
e
t
o
a
v
o
i
d
Ba
c
k
l
i
t
s
i
g
n
a
g
e
Hi
g
h
s
i
g
n
a
g
e
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
59
5
of
93
0
wa
y
f
i
n
d
i
n
g
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
59
6
of
93
0
Op
e
n
S
p
a
c
e
Se
t
b
a
c
k
,
&
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
a
r
e
a
s
to
b
e
e
x
c
l
u
d
e
d
f
r
o
m
ca
l
c
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
20
%
o
f
a
d
j
u
s
t
e
d
g
r
o
s
s
si
t
e
a
r
e
a
t
o
b
e
i
n
o
p
e
n
us
e
a
b
l
e
o
p
e
n
s
p
a
c
e
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
59
7
of
93
0
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
59
8
of
93
0
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
59
9
of
93
0
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
60
0
of
93
0
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
60
1
of
93
0
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
60
2
of
93
0
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
60
3
of
93
0
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
60
4
of
93
0
Si
t
e
C
o
n
t
e
x
t
&
E
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
60
5
of
93
0
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
–
S
i
t
e
f
r
o
m
F
i
r
d
a
l
e
A
v
e
n
u
e
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
60
6
of
93
0
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
–
S
i
t
e
S
u
r
v
e
y
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
60
7
of
93
0
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
&
S
i
t
e
C
o
n
s
t
r
a
i
n
t
s
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
t
r
e
e
s
a
l
o
n
g
n
o
r
t
h
b
o
u
n
d
a
r
y
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
S
e
w
e
r
L
i
n
e
Bu
s
y
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
o
n
F
i
r
d
a
l
e
W
a
y
Pe
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
a
c
c
e
s
s
i
b
i
l
i
t
y
a
n
d
o
v
e
r
a
l
l
s
a
f
e
t
y
i
s
s
u
e
s
Elevation Changes Existing trees along north boundary Existing Sewer Line Busy traffic on Firdale Way Pedestrian accessibility and overall safety issues
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
60
8
of
93
0
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
60
9
of
93
0
En
d
S
l
i
d
e
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
61
0
of
93
0
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
61
1
of
93
0
Mi
x
e
d
-
U
s
e
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
Ex
a
m
p
l
e
s
-
-
F
o
u
r
s
t
o
r
i
e
s
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
61
2
of
93
0
Mixed-Use Buildings Four stories
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
61
3
of
93
0
624 Edmonds Way, Edmonds, WA 98020-4641 425.778.5400 FAX.778.3032
October 2, 2008
Subject: Firdale Village Rezone
Ladies and Gentlemen of the Planning Board:
To assist in the review of the upcoming review of the Firdale Village Rezone, we are requesting
an evaluation of the following areas within the overall Design Standards language.
1. Parking Requirements
2. Maximum Building Height – Multi-Family Subdistrict
3. Signage Requirements
4. Open Space Requirements
We are providing some background information on each issue, including relevant text from the
proposed Design Standards along with suggested additional language, modifications and
explanatory notes. Additional background information and illustrations will be provided at the
Planning Board meeting.
Maximum Parking Height and Parking Requirements
Excerpt from Site Design – Development Standards
Development Standards – General
A. Development Requirements can be summarized as follows:
Subdistricts
Minimum
Street
Setback
Minimum
Side
Setback
Minimum
Rear
Setback
Maximum
Number of
Stories
Maximum
Height
Minimum3
Parking
Spaces
Per Unit
Or per 1000 ft.
District 1
Commercial
TBD 15' NA 3 stories 39’ 3 – 4 per
1000 SF
District 2 –
MF
NA 15’ 20' 4 stories 48’ base
height + 4’
ddl
1 per Unit
** See section on Maximum Building Height below
Packet Page 614 of 930
1. Parking: Minimum Parking Spaces Required
District 2 – Multi-Family:
Proposed:
Minimum Parking Spaces per dwelling unit: 1 parking space
Note:
Larger jurisdictions in the Puget Sound area including various neighborhoods in
the City of Seattle, and others are encouraging reduction in minimum parking
spaces required per dwelling unit in an effort to encourage transportation
alternatives and reduce size of parking lots needed.
‘
The Design Standards propose a minimum parking ratio of 1 parking place per
dwelling unit, to help reduce the parking requirements and encourage transit
alternatives. The developer / architect would be allowed to provide a higher ratio
of parking however. Because of the mixed-use commercial parking
requirements, additional shared parking would also be available in the evening
hours when it would not be needed at the same level for commercial uses.
See Seattle Municipal Code 23.54.010 – Parking Requirements
Within this section, a number of areas within the City of Seattle require a
minimum of 1 parking space per dwelling unit. These areas include the
University Village area, the Capital Hill area, and South Lake Union.
2. Maximum Building Height:
Excerpt from Design Standards – Design Standards
x. Building Scale and Building Height
x. Intent: To provide a consistency of architectural scale for different sections of
the development:
The more commercial/retail area closer to Firdale Avenue shall be lower in scale
than the multi-family buildings oriented to the rear of the site.
Building Height:
Commercial/Office/Retail: Generally 1 – 3 stories.
Minimum height: 20 feet; Maximum height 39 feet.
Multi-family Residential: Maximum -- 4 stories.
Maximum height: 48 feet – base height with
Allowance of an additional 4 feet to a maximum of 52 feet.*
--------------------------------------------
Add: info regarding clarification of maximum height allowed in
MF District (SubDistrict 2)
Maximum Height (MF District):
A maximum of 52’ is permissible to allow for variation in rooflines.
A base height maximum of 48’ is allowed, with an additional allowance of
4 feet to allow for roofline variation and sloping rooflines.
Additional text:
Mechanical equipment may extend above this maximum up to six feet above the
base roof height.
(Add further explanation of what is allowed).
Packet Page 615 of 930
3. Signage Requirements
Excerpt from Design Standards –
Section: Signage
--------------------------------
4. Signage should make a positive contribution to the overall visual character of
the streetscape. Signs should be appropriately sized with the scale of the
building. Materials and colors used in the construction of signs should be
compatible with the overall design of the site.
5. Signs may be fabricated of mixed-media, including metal reverse-illuminated
letters, suspended neon letters, illuminated individual letters, signs etched or
cutout of solid materials such as wood or brass and illuminated from behind.
6. Internally illuminated boxes with formed or painted lettering are not permitted.
7. Large internally illuminated monument signs would not be permitted.
Add:.
Instead, larger signs of wood or other non-transparent/ translucent
material are allowed that have exterior sources of illumination (as
opposed to internal).
Monument signs constructed from plastic or plastic-like material are
not allowed.
8. ‘Wayfinding signage.’ The project shall include a coordinated system of
signs to aid in visitor orientation and navigation through the project.
-------------------------------
Note: Many related standards or guidelines for Mixed-use Development and
Pedestrian oriented town design contain provisions restricting internally
illuminated monument signs which are associated with strip mall type
development.
4. Open Space Requirements and Site Coverage
Add to the Section, ‘Site Design, Open Space Requirements’
Language can be clarified and refined.
The minimum open space requirement for the net project site shall be
20%, not including rear yard setbacks, parking lots, and other non-
usable spaces. Open Space shall include usable outdoor spaces
including courtyards, plazas, pedestrian walkways and
hardscaped/landscaped areas.
Note:
A minimum amount of open space is necessary to ensure adequate usable
open space areas and landscaped areas that will help to make the project an
attractive and inviting pedestrian oriented neighborhood project.
The open space requirement for Multi-family projects within the City of
Seattle neighborhoods is 20% in many cases.
Packet Page 616 of 930
Chart B
for Section 23.54.015
PARKING FOR RESIDENTIAL USES
Use Minimum parking required
A. General Residential Uses
A. Adult family homes 1 space for each dwelling unit
B. Artist's studio/dwellings 1 space for each dwelling unit
C. Assisted living facilities 1 space for each 4 assisted living
units;
plus
1 space for each 2 staff members
on-site
at peak staffing time; plus
1 barrier-free passenger loading
and
unloading space
D. Caretaker's Quarters 1 space for each dwelling unit
E. Congregate residences 1 space for each 4 residents
Packet Page 617 of 930
F. Floating homes 1 space for each dwelling unit
G. Mobile home parks 1 space for each mobile home lot
as
defined in Chapter 22.904
H. Multifamily structures, Lots containing:
except as provided in 2-10 dwelling units: 1.1 spaces
for each
Sections B or C of this dwelling unit
chart (1) (2) 11-30 dwelling units: 1.15 spaces
for
each dwelling unit
31-60 dwelling units: 1.2 spaces
for
each dwelling unit
More than 60 dwelling units: 1.25
spaces
for each dwelling unit
In addition, for all multifamily
structures whose average gross
floor area
per dwelling unit, excluding decks
and
all portions of a structure shared
by
multiple dwelling units, exceeds
500
square feet, an additional .0002
spaces
per square foot in excess of 500
shall be
Packet Page 618 of 930
required up to a maximum
additional .15
spaces per dwelling unit; and
When at least 50 percent of the
dwelling
units in a multifamily structure
have 3
bedrooms, an additional .25
spaces per
bedroom for each unit with 3
bedrooms;
and
When a multifamily structure
contains a
dwelling unit with 4 or more
bedrooms, an
additional .25 spaces per bedroom
for
each unit with 4 or more bedrooms
I. Nursing homes (3) 1 space for each 2 staff doctors;
plus
1 additional space for each 3
employees;
plus
1 space for each 6 beds
J. Single-family dwelling 1 space for each dwelling unit
units
B. Residential or Multifamily Requirements with Location Criteria
Packet Page 619 of 930
K. Residential uses in No minimum requirement
commercial zones within
urban centers and Station
Area Overlay District
L. Residential uses in 1 space for each dwelling unit
commercial zones (1)
M. Multifamily structures For units with less than two
bedrooms, as
within the University of required in row H.
Washington parking impact 1.5 spaces per unit with 2 or more
area shown on Map A (1) bedrooms; plus
.25 spaces per bedroom for units
with 3
or more bedrooms
N. Multifamily structures 1 space for each dwelling unit
with 2 or
within multifamily zones in fewer bedrooms;
the University District 1.5 spaces for each dwelling unit
with 3
Northwest Urban Center or more bedrooms, plus
Village (1) .25 spaces for each bedroom in
dwelling
units with more than 3 bedrooms
Packet Page 620 of 930
O. Multifamily structures, 1.5 spaces for each dwelling unit
within the Alki area shown
on Map B following this
section (1)
P. Multifamily structures, on 1 space for each dwelling unit
lots that contain a total
of 10 or fewer dwelling
units, all in
ground-related structures,
except within the
University District
Northwest Urban Center
Village (1)
Q. Multifamily structures, 1 space for each dwelling unit
within multifamily zones in
the Capitol Hill Urban
Center Village (1)
R. Multifamily structures, 0.5 spaces for each dwelling unit
within multifamily zones in
the First Hill or Pike/Pine
Urban Center Villages (1)
C. Multifamily Requirements with Income Criteria or
Packet Page 621 of 930
Location Criteria and Income Criteria
S. Multifamily structures 0.33 space for each dwelling unit
with 2
located in multifamily or fewer bedrooms, and
zones in the Capitol Hill, 0.5 space for each dwelling unit
with 3
First Hill, Pike/Pine, or more bedrooms
South Lake Union, 12th
Avenue and Uptown Urban
Center Villages: for each
dwelling unit rented to and
occupied by a household
with an income at time of
its initial occupancy at or
below 30 percent of the
median income (4), for the
life of the building (1)
T. Multifamily structures 0.5 space for each dwelling unit
with 2
located in multifamily or fewer bedrooms, and
zones in the Capitol Hill, 1 space for each dwelling unit
with 3 or
South Lake Union, 12th more bedrooms
Avenue and Uptown Urban
Center Villages: for each
dwelling unit rented to and
Packet Page 622 of 930
occupied by a household
with an income at time of
its initial occupancy of
between 30 and 50 percent
of the median income (4),
for the life of the
building (1)
U. Multifamily structures 0.33 space for each dwelling unit
with 2
located outside of or fewer bedrooms, and 1 space for
each
commercial zones in urban dwelling unit with 3 or more
bedrooms
centers: for each dwelling
unit rented to and occupied
by a household with an
income at time of its
initial occupancy at or
below 30 percent of the
median income (4), for the
life of the building (1)
V. Multifamily structures 0.75 spaces for each dwelling unit
located outside of
commercial zones in urban
centers: for each dwelling
Packet Page 623 of 930
unit with 2 or fewer
bedrooms rented to and
occupied by a household
with an income at time of
its initial occupancy of
between 30 and 50 percent
of the median income (4),
for the life of the
building (1)
W. Low-income elderly 1 space for each 6 dwelling units
multifamily structures (1)
(4)
X. Low-income disabled 1 space for each 4 dwelling units
multifamily structures (1)
(4)
Y. Low-income 1 space for each 5 dwelling units
elderly/low-income disabled
multifamily structures (1)
(4)
(1) The general requirements of line H of Chart B for multifamily
structures
are superseded to the extent that a use, structure or development
qualifies
Packet Page 624 of 930
for either a greater or a lesser parking requirement under any other
multifamily provision. To the extent that a multifamily structure fits
within more than one line in Chart B, the least of the applicable
parking
requirements applies, except that if an applicable parking requirement
in
section B of Chart B requires more parking than line H, the parking
requirement in line H does not apply. The different parking
requirements
listed for certain categories of multifamily structures shall not be
construed to create separate uses for purposes of any requirements
related
to establishing or changing a use under this Title.
(2) Parking spaces required for multifamily structures may be provided
as
"tandem parking" spaces according to subsection B of Section
23.54.020 .
(3) For development within single-family zones the Director may waive
some
or all of the parking requirements according to Section 23.44.015 .
(4) Notice of Income Restrictions. Prior to issuance of any permit to
establish, construct or modify any use or structure, or to reduce any
parking accessory to a multifamily use or structure, if the applicant
relies
upon these reduced parking requirements, the applicant shall record in
the
King County Office of Records and Elections a declaration signed and
Packet Page 625 of 930
acknowledged by the owner(s), in a form prescribed by the Director,
which
shall identify the subject property by legal description, and shall
acknowledge and provide notice to any prospective purchasers that
specific
income limits are a condition for maintaining the reduced parking
requirement.
Packet Page 626 of 930
1
A.D. Shapiro Architects
Firdale Village -- Draft Zoning Code
08-07-08
Chapter ___
Firdale Village – Mixed Use
Zoning Code (Part I)
& Design Guidelines (See Part II)
Draft 08-07-08
Sections:
xx.xx.xxx Purposes
xx.xx.xxx Uses
xx.xx.xxx Subdistricts. (Zones)
xx.xx.xxx Site development standards
xx.xx.xxx Site development exceptions
xx.xx.xxx Purposes
xx.xx.xxx Link with Design Guidelines
xx.xx.xxx Design Guidelines
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
xx.xx.xxx Purposes.
The Firdale Village Mixed-Use ______zone has the following specific
purposes in addition to the general purposes for business and
commercial zones in Chapter 16.40 ECDC:
A. To reserve and regulate areas for a ‘neighborhood center’ type of
mixed-used development that includes a mix of commercial and multi-
residential housing types, and a range of greater densities than are
available in the single family residential zone;
B. To promote a mix of residential, commercial, and other uses in a
manner that is consistent with the City’s comprehensive plan,
C. To provide for those additional uses which complement and are
compatible with multiple residential uses.
Packet Page 627 of 930
2
A.D. Shapiro Architects
Firdale Village -- Draft Zoning Code
08-07-08
##### Uses.
A. Permitted Primary Uses.
Multi-family Residential;
1. Commercial/residential mixed use developments, provided
that the residential units are located above the ground floor and
are at a density not to exceed ____ units per acre;
2. Offices;
3. Retail;
Neighborhood oriented retail uses intended to support other
uses in the immediate area, but excluding trailer sales, car lots,
heavy equipment sales and service, and any other retail activity
that relies primarily on outdoor display of merchandise;
4. Small Businesses;
5. Restaurants; excluding drive-in restaurants;
6. Home occupations (businesses);
7. Personal and professional services;
8. Arts Related: Including theater, galleries;
9. Health care facilities;
10. Child Day Care Centers;
11. Animal related services and businesses including:
Dog Day Care Centers, Animal Grooming;
12. Neighborhood parks, natural open spaces, and community
parks with an adopted master plan subject to the requirements
of ECDC
____________.
13. Senior Housing (define further) ;
--------------------------------
14. ?? Housing for low income elderly in accordance with the
requirements of Chapter 20.25 ECDC;
Packet Page 628 of 930
3
A.D. Shapiro Architects
Firdale Village -- Draft Zoning Code
08-07-08
____________ Secondary Uses
1. The keeping of ______ domestic animal per dwelling unit in
multiple family buildings;
2. *** Additional ________
_________ Accessory uses.
1. Day-care facilities of any size to be operated in a separate,
nonresidential portion of a multifamily residential dwelling structure
operated primarily for the benefit of the residents thereof.,
(Parking, storage, services areas /uses for MF)
a. Private parking,
b. Private recreational facilities,
c. Private greenhouses covering no more than five percent
of the site in total;
_____________ Conditional Uses
1. Buildings or structures that exceed the maximum height limit.
This category is intended for ‘landmark’ buildings or structures
or accessory structures such as clock tower or similar unique
structure that contributes to the overall development.
Packet Page 629 of 930
4
A.D. Shapiro Architects
Firdale Village -- Draft Zoning Code
08-07-08
_____________ Summary of Site Development Standards
A. Any development located in _____ zone shall be subject to design
review in accordance with Chapter __________.
B. Development Requirements can be summarized as follows:
(**Map to be added)
Subdistricts
Minimum
Street
Setback
Minimum
Side
Setback
Minimum
Rear
Setback
Maximum
Height
Maximum
Number of
Stories
Minimum3
Parking
(Spaces
Per Unit)
District 1
Commercial
TBD 15' NA TBD 3 stories
District 2 –
MF
NA 15’ 20' TBD
4 stories 1.5
C. Design Guidelines Required:
1. No development shall be permitted in the Firdale
Village MU zone unless a set of Design Guidelines
(and Master Plan) have been prepared, also identifying
land uses and densities as set forth in _________.
2. The Design Guidelines shall describe the land use
parameters and relationships to guide future site
development.
The Design Guidelines shall include:
Standards and guidelines that describe important
aspects of the neighborhood village design including
pedestrian oriented design elements, site design and
low-impact design, landscaping requirements,
architectural design and project character, lighting,
safety issues and sustainable design elements.
Packet Page 630 of 930
5
A.D. Shapiro Architects
Firdale Village -- Draft Zoning Code
08-07-08
The Master Plan will provide more specific project
information than the Guidelines, and address general
land use designations, site access, densities, open space
areas and buffers. The plan shall also illustrate the
relationship between the site and adjacent residential
properties.
It is intended that site layouts, the range and intensity of
uses, access and circulation shall be depicted in both
graphic and narrative form in a general manner.
The applicant also has the option of submitting a
Master Plan concurrently with a specific site design.
If submitted concurrently, the City shall review the
applications concurrently.
Packet Page 631 of 930
1
Firdale Village Site -- Design Guidelines
A.D. Shapiro Architects / DRAFT 08-07-08
Firdale Village Site
Design Guidelines
(Part II)
Draft 08-07-08
NOTE: This version provides a working draft of the Design Guidelines.
Text formatting is in the process of being edited and refined. Some additional
text and illustrations will also be added. (Places where text where be added are
indicated by asterisks**). The Guidelines will follow the Zoning Code language.
Index
A. Goals and Vision
B. Site Design and Planning
C. Architectural Design
D. Pedestrian Orientation, Outdoor Spaces & Amenities
E. Vehicular Access and Parking
F. Site Landscaping & Screening Elements
G. Signage
H. Site Lighting
I. Safety Issues
J. Sustainable Design
The Design Guidelines use imperative language such as “shall” and “must”
to indicate high priority features and a strong directive toward satisfying the
‘Guidelines’ intent. Words such as “should” and “may” indicate desirable
conditions or elements that are strongly encouraged.
Additional possible illustrations to be added:
Site map illustrating subdistricts.
Massing diagram showing building massing –
maximum height for different subdistricts
Buffer areas with trees
Architectural façade design – details
Packet Page 632 of 930
2
Firdale Village Site -- Design Guidelines
A.D. Shapiro Architects / DRAFT 08-07-08
A. Goals and Vision
1. General Intent of
Design and Development Standards.
The Design and Development Guidelines will help to shape a neighborhood
village form of development, a place of complementary uses within an
aesthetically attractive, easily accessible and economically healthy
environment. The guidelines and standards will be used to create an
attractive, inviting environment for residential and commercial uses, with an
emphasis on the needs of the pedestrian, including the needs of senior
citizens, youths and physically challenged persons, but that is also accessible
for vehicles.
Development should be located to facilitate transit and non-motorized travel
modes. On-site facilities that are convenient and attractive to pedestrians,
bicyclists and vehicles are encouraged. The following pedestrian-oriented
land uses will be designed and evolve over time: retail shops, professional
offices, restaurants, services, multi-residential and community related
facilities.
2. Project Vision
Scale and Form
The design vision for Firdale Village is intended to create a vibrant
neighborhood village form of development that creates a balance between
commercial, retail and residential uses and contributes to the vitality of the
neighborhood and area. The project is intended to support an environment
that is convenient and accessible to the pedestrian, visitor, tenant, motorist
and public transit user. The project can also be an important example of a
more sustainable form of development, one that incorporates sustainable
design strategies and methods in many aspects of the project – from site
design, construction to long term water and energy efficiency.
New development should include pedestrian amenities that bring residents
and customers to the center, including local shopping, services, offices,
specialty retail, restaurants, and other related uses. Outdoor spaces should
function as social settings for a variety of experiences, while maintaining a
human scale and ability for easy pedestrian circulation.
Packet Page 633 of 930
3
Firdale Village Site -- Design Guidelines
A.D. Shapiro Architects / DRAFT 08-07-08
B. Site Design and Planning
Intent:
Consider and respond to the local climatic and ecological context by
incorporating solar orientation, hydrology and geology into design
solutions. Consider the site design as a whole in helping to create an
inviting environment for residents, tenants and visitors.
Respond to special opportunities and constraints of the site, such as solar
orientation, changes in topography, preservation of existing trees as
buffer, and opportunities for more sustainable methods of handling of
stormwater on the site. Take advantage of the southern solar orientation
for multi-family residential orientation and outdoor courtyards.
Incorporate adequate usable open space and landscaped areas in both
private residential and commercial subdistricts.
1. Site Features
The project should include public amenities, such as storefronts with
orientation to the streetscape, and primary internal streets (driveways),
street trees, seating, fountains or water features, outdoor areas with
seating, sculpture or other forms of art, and places for gathering and
lingering. The use of materials, color, texture, form and massing,
proportion, public amenities, landscaping and vegetation along with
mitigation of environmental impacts, should be incorporated in the
design of the project with the purpose of supporting a human scale,
pedestrian-oriented development.
2. Tree Retention
The project site plan shall retain and project the existing stand of
evergreen trees at the (north) end of the site, to help serve as a buffer
between the new buildings and the residential parcels bordering the
project.
The buffer area (setback) on the north boundary of the site shall not be
less than 20’ (?)** feet in the area designated as buffer with trees.
Additional significant trees in other areas of the site shall be considered
for retaining.
Packet Page 634 of 930
4
Firdale Village Site -- Design Guidelines
A.D. Shapiro Architects / DRAFT 08-07-08
3. Open Space
Design Intent: The project should develop a comprehensive open space
network that uses courtyards and other open space elements to connect
the residential and commercial uses. Open space areas and the paths that
link them should facilitate the integration of adjacent land uses on the
site.
Residential Development should include private open space or outdoor
areas for residents. These areas should be configured and designed so as
to ensure privacy for residential uses while also providing linkages to the
public open space components of the project.
Seating areas should be provided, coordinated with landscaping, shaded
areas, lighting and orientation to focal points.
4. Site Setbacks/Buffers
See Zoning Section __________
** Add info re: Setbacks -- Key into zoning, site map with sub-districts
Packet Page 635 of 930
5
Firdale Village Site -- Design Guidelines
A.D. Shapiro Architects / DRAFT 08-07-08
C. Architectural Design
1. Design Intent: To create a unified design concept, through design of
various buildings that present a unified character while allowing for
individual expression of each building.
The massing, layout and height should complement the overall
neighborhood village character of the project.
The design character of an individual building should be compatible with
its neighbors and also include features or characteristics that lend to its
identity.
a. Scale.
The design of all structures shall consider how the structure and site
development will be viewed from the street and adjacent properties. Scale
is not simply the size of the buildings, it is the proportion of buildings in
relationship to each other, to the street and to the pedestrian
environment.
b. Form.
Building forms shall not present visual mass or bulk impacts that are out
of proportion to the adjoining structures, or that appear from the street
or sidewalk as having unmodulated visual mass or bulk. Building
additions should complement the original structure in design.
c. Style. The objectives and standards do not set a particular style of
architecture or design theme. The style and site design shall be pedestrian
in scale and address design features such as sloped roof lines; view
protection; distinctive building shapes; integration of art; textures;
patterns; treatment of pedestrian and public spaces; interface with the
public right-of-way; landscaping; signage and facade treatments.
2. Architectural Character
a. Objectives. Building facades should be designed with a variety of
architectural elements that suggest the buildings’ use and how it relates to
other development in the specific focus area. Buildings should be
oriented to the street frontage to enliven the street edge as well as to
maximize access from the public sidewalk.
Packet Page 636 of 930
6
Firdale Village Site -- Design Guidelines
A.D. Shapiro Architects / DRAFT 08-07-08
b. Building facades should provide visual interest to pedestrians. Special
care should be given to landscaping, mass and roof forms of buildings to
provide visual interest from public streets and multi-family residential
buildings. Street level windows, minimum building setbacks, on-street
entrances, landscaping and articulated walls should be encouraged.
c. Architectural features and other amenities should be used to highlight
buildings, site features and entries and add visual interest. All buildings
within the development shall provide elements that attract the interest of
residents, shoppers and workers.
d. Building Scale and Building Height
Intent: To provide a consistency of architectural scale for different
sections of the development:
The more commercial/retail area closer to Firdale Avenue shall be lower
in scale than the multi-family buildings oriented to the rear
of the site.
Building Height: Commercial/Office/Retail:
Generally 1 – 3 stories.
Minimum height: 20 feet; Maximum height ( )
Multi-family Residential: Maximum -- 4 stories.
Maximum height: 50 feet.
e. Building Siting and Orientation
1) Where feasible, primary commercial buildings should be located
adjacent to the street at the front setback line or behind a public
or semi-public space, such as outdoor seating area for a
restaurant.
2) All visible building frontages should be detailed with architectural
elements.
** More re orientation
f. Building Articulation
1) In order to prevent long stretches of monotonous facades,
Buildings over 100 feet in length as measured parallel to a
roadway or public open space should be vertically articulated
along the façade at regular intervals.
Packet Page 637 of 930
7
Firdale Village Site -- Design Guidelines
A.D. Shapiro Architects / DRAFT 08-07-08
2) Articulation may be accomplished in several ways, including:
Modulation – the stepping back of projection of a portion
Of the façade.
Including significant building elements such as balconies,
Porches, canopies, entry areas, etc. that visually break up the
façade.
Building focal points which include distinctive entry features,
Changing the roofline.
Changing materials.
3. Building Facades – Visual Interest
a. Objectives.
Building facades should be designed with a variety of architectural
elements that suggest the buildings’ use and provide visual interest to
residents and pedestrians. Building facades should provide visual
interest to pedestrians. Special focus should be given to mass, scale
roof forms and landscaping to provide a high level of visual interest,
with special attention to the ground floor of retail and commercial
buildings.
Architectural features and other amenities should be used to highlight
buildings, site features and entries and add visual interest.
b. Design Standards:
1) Street-facing and major Façade Elements:
All major mixed-use, commercial and/or retail buildings within
the development shall include at least six (6) of the following
elements on the major facades, (to be defined) with at least five
(5) elements on the ground floor.
a) Window and doors treatments which embellish the
façade.
b) Unique façade treatment, such as decorative materials
and design elements.
c) Decorative light fixtures.
d) Decorative paving.
e) Recessed entrances.
f) Balconies.
g) Railings, gill work, gates
h) Unique landscaping.
i) Belt courses.
j) Decorative tile work.
k) Projecting metal and glass canopy
l) Clerestories over storefront windows.
Packet Page 638 of 930
8
Firdale Village Site -- Design Guidelines
A.D. Shapiro Architects / DRAFT 08-07-08
2) Walls.
Blank walls without visual or architectural interest shall be
avoided. Buildings shall provide massing breaks along wall
expanses and walls shall include visual or architectural treatments.
Walls facing the sidewalk or other pedestrian spaces should be
treated with recesses, landscaping, windows, seating, recessed
secondary entrances, balconies, belt courses, cornices, and other
means of breaking up the blank wall surface.
3) Ground Floor Windows and Doors.
Major commercial buildings should have at least 75 percent of
the length of the ground floor façade between the height of two
feet and seven feet devoted to windows and doors affording
views into retail, office or lobby space.
4) Transparent Facades .
Major commercial building facades should have a high degree of
transparency into the first floor offices/retail to help create a
more inviting ambiance. See section on Ground floor windows
and doors.
5) Upper Story Facades
Upper stories of buildings above two stories should maintain an
expression line along the façade such as a setback, change of
material, or a projection to reduce the perceived building mass.
Upper-story features should improve the relationship between
the upper story and the street, and include but are not limited to
balconies, roof decks, bay windows or upper story commercial
activities.
6) Long Buildings.
Long buildings, more than 50 feet in length, shall provide relief to
perceived building mass through such features as varied setback
or heights, or projecting windows, entrances or walls.
Long linear walls should be staggered horizontally and vertically
to provide interest.
7) Entrances
Building entrances should concentrate along the sidewalk and
should be physically and visually inviting. Entrance doors should
be recessed from the façade surface to emphasize the entrance
and provide a sheltered transition to the interior of the building.
Special paving treatments may be used to enhance the entry.
Packet Page 639 of 930
9
Firdale Village Site -- Design Guidelines
A.D. Shapiro Architects / DRAFT 08-07-08
8) Pedestrian walkways
Pedestrian walkways should be a minimum of eight-feet wide
Wheelchair ramps should be constructed between the sidewalk
and building entrances.
c. Materials and Color
Objectives:
The buildings should include textured high quality materials and
colors and provide a visually interesting experience. Color should be
carefully considered in relation to the overall project design.
Development and Design Standards:
Building Exteriors:
Building Exteriors should be constructed from high quality and
durable materials, that will require minimal maintenance.
Packet Page 640 of 930
10
Firdale Village Site -- Design Guidelines
A.D. Shapiro Architects / DRAFT 08-07-08
D. Pedestrian Orientation, Outdoor Spaces and Amenities
1. Pedestrian Oriented Spaces
a. Mixed-use areas shall emphasize pedestrian orientation by utilizing
features such as plazas, interior walkways, outdoor courtyards, outdoor
seating areas, fountains, outdoor street furniture and other similar
elements.
b. Outdoor pedestrian spaces shall be landscaped and include
appropriate street furniture and other elements to facilitate use of
outdoor space.
2. Pedestrian Connections
a. Attractive well-marked pedestrian links between parking and
buildings shall be provided. The connection shall be designed as safe,
clearly marked and attractive pedestrian walkways across traffic lanes,
landscaped areas and parking lots.
b. Where walkways cross traffic lanes, special features should be used to
increase safety for pedestrians. Potential features include raised or
textured pavement to define the pedestrian space, curb extensions or
low-level lighting such as bollard lights.
c. Pedestrian connections should be provided between buildings with
special focus on connections between residential and commercial areas.
d. Pedestrian connections should include design cues to help demarcate
the transition between public and private spaces.
Design cues may include a change in materials, colors, landscaping or the
dimensions of the space.
e. Illumination of walkways should be concentrated along the
pedestrian paths leading to parking areas and in the specific areas where
cars are parked.
f. Walkways should be landscaped where feasible.
(See Landscape Guidelines).
Packet Page 641 of 930
11
Firdale Village Site -- Design Guidelines
A.D. Shapiro Architects / DRAFT 08-07-08
3. Pedestrian Amenities
Mixed-use residential buildings are encouraged to provide an easily
accessible gathering space for building occupants and their guests.
Examples include an upper level or roof-top patio area or an at-grade
courtyard.
4. Outdoor Spaces
Pedestrian oriented outdoor spaces including patios, plazas, courtyards
and squares or larger open spaces shall be provided within the
development. Such open spaces should include seating, lighting, special
paving, landscaping and possibly artwork or sculptures.
A variety of outdoor spaces are encouraged:
Patios, courtyards, squares and other landscaped open space should be
proportionate in size to the development.
**Not less than _______ shall be provided in total usable open space.
a. Courtyards:
An outdoor covered or uncovered area easily accessible to the public
at the same level as the public sidewalk or pedestrian connections
which should be:
Be at least 10 feet in width, with a building façade
on at least one side;
Be landscaped with groundcover, shrubs, trees or other landscaping
over 25% of its area. (?)
Include seating, special paving material, pedestrian-scale lighting and
other pedestrian furnishings;
*Minimum # of courtyards, or minimum area designated
for courtyards.
a. Pedestrian amenities such as street trees, landscaping, and seasonal flowers,
benches, lighting, banners and possibly artwork shall be provided to create interest
along walkways, courtyards and other pedestrian oriented spaces.
b. All public open spaces, walkways, and sidewalks shall meet ADA standards.
c. The addition of texture to the ground plane of sidewalks and plazas with unit
pavers, bricks, tiles or public artwork is strongly encouraged.
d. Safe public walkways around and through parking areas are also encouraged.
e. Awnings, arcades, pergolas, and/or overhangs should be provided to protect
pedestrians from inclement weather whenever possible.
f. Pedestrian amenities and detailing of site furniture, lighting, paving, and site
amenities should be consistent throughout the development to create an identifiable
identity and image.
g. Separate areas should be provided for active and passive activities.
Packet Page 642 of 930
12
Firdale Village Site -- Design Guidelines
A.D. Shapiro Architects / DRAFT 08-07-08
b. Mini-plazas, Squares and other open space
c. Upper story decks, and balconies as private open space should also
be incorporated for residential use. Balconies should be appropriately
scaled and incorporated into the overall design of the building.
Consider environmental conditions such as sun, shade, and prevailing
winds when designing outdoor spaces including courtyards, decks,
balconies other usable open spaces.
5. Internal Circulation
a. On-site pathways which are separated from vehicular traffic should
be provided for pedestrians and bicyclists and should provide
connections between building entries and public sidewalks.
b. The project should include at least one separated pedestrian pathway
through the parking area to the main entrance.
c. Pedestrian walkways and spaces should include elements such as
special paving materials, raised curbs, trellis structures, landscaping,
pedestrian-scaled lighting, seating and trash receptacles.
E. Vehicular Access and Parking
Parking Layout and Design
1. Parking should be located on the sides or rear of projects with pedestrian
connections between the parking areas of the project.
2. Building siting and parking design should maximize opportunities for
pedestrian and vehicular circulation between adjacent sites, such as joint
access easements and common driveways.
Access Drives
Building siting and parking design should maximize opportunities for
shared parking, access entries and driveways in order to minimize the
number of curb cuts. This will help to limit possible conflicts between
pedestrians and vehicles entering and leaving the parking area.
Vehicular Entrances and Driveways
Add additional text
Packet Page 643 of 930
13
Firdale Village Site -- Design Guidelines
A.D. Shapiro Architects / DRAFT 08-07-08
F. Site Landscaping & Screening Elements
1. General Landscaping
Site landscaping should be designed to achieve the project vision as
described in Section A. Trees and landscaping shall be incorporated into
the site design in order to provide a more attractive overall pedestrian
oriented environment and to soften and screen the visual impact of hard
surfaces such as parking lots, service areas, walkways and gathering
places. Outdoor furniture should be compatible with the project
architecture and should be carefully considered as integral elements of
the landscape.
a. A range of landscape materials, trees, evergreen shrubs, groundcovers
and seasonal flowers shall be provided for color and visual interest.
b. Trees should be placed to allow southern sun exposure in such a
manner as not to conflict with pedestrian activity areas. (For this reason
trees with a fine leaf texture are also preferred in the plaza.)
c. Planters or large pots with small shrubs and seasonal flowers may
also be used to separate café seating from traffic flow and create
protected sub-areas within the plaza for sitting and people watching.
d. Creative use of plant materials such as climbing vines or trellises, and
use of sculpture groupings, etc. are also encouraged.
e. Native and drought tolerant plants are preferred and should be used
where possible.
f. Sun angle at noon and wind pattern should be considered in the
design of the open space and courtyards to maximize sunlight areas.
g. Materials: brick, concrete, unit pavers, tile, stone, wood (some
seating).
h. No dumpsters or service areas shall be adjacent to open space.
i. Public restrooms shall be located nearby in an accessible public
space.
2. Landscaping – Parking Lots
a. Parking areas should be screened from pedestrian-oriented areas
through the use of trees, shrubs, walls and/or trellis structures with
plants.
b. Parking lots should provide landscaping next to buildings and along
walkways. Parking lots should provide enough trees so that *____ %
of the lot is shaded within a five-year period and the landscape beds have
a 90% ground coverage in five years.
c. Parking areas should have one tree per every (4 – 5) parking stalls.
Packet Page 644 of 930
14
Firdale Village Site -- Design Guidelines
A.D. Shapiro Architects / DRAFT 08-07-08
3. Landscape Requirements
***Add quantitative info
Minimum amounts, Locations
4. Screening Elements
Intent: To minimize the negative visual impacts of service and
storage elements (ie. waste receptacles, loading docks), to the street and
pedestrian environment.
a. On-site Service Areas.
All on-site service areas, loading zones, outdoor storage areas, garbage
collection and recycling areas should be located in an area not visible
from public streets or important pedestrian areas of the site. These areas
should be enclosed and screened around their perimeter by a wall or
fence at least seven feet high. Service areas should be located and
designed for easy access by service vehicles and for convenient access by
each tenant.
b. Service elements shall be located and designed to minimize the
impacts of the pedestrian environment and adjacent uses. Service
elements should generally by concentrated and located where they are
accessible to service vehicles and convenient for tenant use.
c. Roof-mounted mechanical equipment, meters and similar structures
and other similar elements shall be located so as not be visible from the
street, public open space, parking areas, or from the ground level of
adjacent properties. Screening features should blend with the.
Packet Page 645 of 930
15
Firdale Village Site -- Design Guidelines
A.D. Shapiro Architects / DRAFT 08-07-08
G. Signage
1. Design Intent:
To encourage signage that is clear, attractive and of an appropriate
scale for the project.
To provide consistent design criteria for the entire project.
To enhance the visual qualities of signage through the use of
complementary sizes, colors and methods of illumination.
To provide signage guidelines that meet commercial tenant needs.
. General Signage
Types of signage fall into three categories:
Monument Site Entry Markers, Tenant Signs (large and small), and
Environmental Graphic Design Elements
2. Signage must be of a high quality of design and materials, consistent
with the design of the project. Signage shall be consistent throughout
the project and always complement a building’s character.
3. Signage should be designed as an integral element of the building’s
Architecture. Wall and blade signs should not interfere with
Architectural details or disrupt the rhythm of windows.
4. Signage should make a positive contribution to the overall visual
character of the streetscape. Signs should be appropriately sized with the
scale of the building. Materials and colors used in the construction of
signs should be compatible with the overall design of the site.
5. Signs may be fabricated of mixed-media, including metal reverse-
illuminated letters, suspended neon letters, illuminated individual letters,
signs etched or cutout of solid materials such as wood or brass and
illuminated from behind.
6. Placement of signs – to be added.
Packet Page 646 of 930
16
Firdale Village Site -- Design Guidelines
A.D. Shapiro Architects / DRAFT 08-07-08
H. Site Lighting
Objectives.
Lighting shall be an integral part of all components of the development.
Lighting shall contribute to the individuality, security and safety of the
site design without having overpowering effects on the adjacent areas.
Lighting is viewed as an important feature, for functional and security
purposes, as well as to enhance the streetscape and public spaces.
1. The design of light fixtures and their structural support should be
integrated with the architectural theme and style of the main structures
on the site, and with landscaping.
2. Exterior lighting shall be of low intensity and shielded so that light will
not spill out onto surrounding properties or project above the horizontal
plan. Warm lighting colors are encouraged.
3. Within parking lots, a minimum foot candle of (1.0) at the perimeter
of light sources and between light sources, and 5.0 under light fixtures is
recommended. Light shall not exceed 0.5 foot candles at any property
line.
4. Wall mounted lights shall be directed downward. Soffit mounted light
fixtures should be recessed in the soffit or otherwise fully shielded from
any property line. Ground mounted or other upward directional lighting
will be permitted only where some form of shielding or light baffling is
provided to create a soft, uniform light quality and minimize light spillage
beyond the wall or sign being illuminated.
5. Along walkways, low level lighting that directs light downward onto the
ground surface is encouraged. The design of the fixtures shall be
compatible with the overall design of the development, and shatterproof
lamp coverings will be used. The fixtures will be placed to minimize
glare and shall be located as to not present hazards for pedestrians or
vehicles.
Packet Page 647 of 930
17
Firdale Village Site -- Design Guidelines
A.D. Shapiro Architects / DRAFT 08-07-08
I. Safety
Intent:
Visitors and residents should find that the development provides the best
possible design to protect their personal safety and safety of their
property. The development should consider safety issues in all aspects of
design, with particular focus on safety of pedestrians within the
development as well as links to transit and outside access to the
development.
1. Architectural features should be used to provide weather protection and
shade, well as highlight building features and entries.
2. Landscaping and lighting should be used to identify entrances, pathways,
public spaces and bus stops.
3. Covered bus stops and waiting areas should be included to provide
pedestrians with outdoor areas sheltered from extreme weather
conditions.
4. Lighting should contribute to the overall safety of the development, and
landscaping should incorporate safe-by-design standards.
Packet Page 648 of 930
18
Firdale Village Site -- Design Guidelines
A.D. Shapiro Architects / DRAFT 08-07-08
J. Sustainable Design
The project will be designed and planned to achieve at least a
3-star (?) rating with the Built Green of Washington program, with
integration of sustainable design methods and technologies throughout
the project.
Particular focus will be given to low-impact site design strategies, water
efficiency and energy efficiency methodologies.
1. Design Goals for Project
Incorporate goals for integration of sustainability at earliest stages of
design process possible. Decide on projected levels of achievement for
the project – For example: The project will achieve at least a 3-star level
of the Built Green of Washington program
2. Site Design and Water Use
The proposed development will integrate low impact development
techniques where reasonably feasible. For the purposes of this
section, low impact development techniques shall include, but shall
not be limited to, the following: the use of bio swales, green roofs,
and grasscrete. "Reasonably feasible" shall be determined based
upon the physical characteristics of the property and its suitability
for the technique; cost alone shall not render the use of low impact
techniques unreasonable or unfeasible.
Additional techniques for strong consideration:
Rainwater harvesting – for use in site irrigation and possibly
toilet flushing for commercial uses.
Utilization of water efficient fixtures throughout the project.
3. Energy Resources
Increase efficiency by maximizing equipment efficiency and using control
strategies. Design to reduce energy and electricity consumption and
eliminate unnecessary demand. Include use of alternative energy
resources wherever possible.
Packet Page 649 of 930
19
Firdale Village Site -- Design Guidelines
A.D. Shapiro Architects / DRAFT 08-07-08
4. Material Resources
Plan for long term use by designing for adaptability, specifying durable
materials and considering energy and maintenance needs.
Select resource efficient and recycled materials where possible,
that minimize environmental impact.
Utilize wood from sustainable sources.
Encourage recycling of waste with easy access recycling stations
and pick-up areas.
Manage construction demolition and waste with a jobsite
recycling plan.
5. Health and Indoor Air Quality
Utilize multiple strategies to limit emissions from materials
Select low VOC and non-toxic materials, paints and finishes.
Pay special attention to residential units in selection of finishes
and paints for low or no toxicity.
Packet Page 650 of 930
20
Firdale Village Site -- Design Guidelines
A.D. Shapiro Architects / DRAFT 08-07-08
Definitions
This section will provide clarification of some of the specific terminology
used within the guidelines.
Courtyard:
A landscaped spaced enclosed on at least three sides by a structure(s).
Curb Cut:
A depression in the curb for the purpose of accommodating a driveway
that provides vehicular access between private property and the street (or
ADA/bike crossing at street corners).
Façade:
Any vertical exterior wall of a building.
Frontage:
Refers to the length of property along a public street or
right-of-way.
Landscaping:
An area is considered to be landscaped if it is:
Planted with vegetation in the form of hardy trees, shrubs, or
Grass or evergreen groundcover maintained in good condition;
or occupied by sculpture, fountains, pools, benches, or other
Outdoor furnishings; or
Occupied by recreational facilities; or
Paved with decorative pavers, brick combined with any of
the above items.
Modulation:
As used in the Design Guidelines, modulation is a stepping back, or
projecting forward of portions of a building face within specified
intervals of building width and depth, as a means of breaking up the
apparent bulk of a structure’s continuous exterior walls.
Pedestrian-Oriented Façade:
A building façade is considered “pedestrian-oriented” if it features any of
the following characteristics:
A transparent window along at least 75 percent of the ground floor
between the height of two feet and eight feet above the ground.
Frontage along a pedestrian-oriented space.
Packet Page 651 of 930
21
Firdale Village Site -- Design Guidelines
A.D. Shapiro Architects / DRAFT 08-07-08
Pedestrian-Oriented Space:
An area between a building and a public space that promotes visual and
pedestrian access to the site and provides pedestrian oriented amenities
and landscaping to enhance the public’s use of the space for passive
activities such as sitting, reading, picknicking, etc.
A “pedestrian-oriented” space must have:
Visual and pedestrian access into the site from the public
right of way;
Paved walking surfaces of either concrete or approved unit paving;
On-site or building-mounted lighting;
Seating comprised of at two feet of seating area (bench, ledge, etc.),
or one individual seat per 60 SF of plaza area or open space.
A “pedestrian-oriented” space is encouraged to have:
Site furniture, amenities such as fountains, kiosk, artwork ,
And landscaping that does not act as a visual barrier.
Human Scale:
The perceived size of a building relative to a human being.
A building is considered to have “good human scale” if there is an
expression of human activity or use that indicates the building’s size.
For example, traditionally sized doors, windows, and balconies are
elements that respond to the size of the human body, and therefore are
elements in a building that indicate a building’s overall size.
Vertical Articulation:
Visual division of a building’s façade into distinct sections or elements to
reduce the apparent horizontal length of the façade.
Packet Page 652 of 930
We invite neighborhood input to help develop a vision for redevelopment of the existing
Firdale Village site, building upon the previous planning work for this area accomplished in
2005 and 2006. This will be the first in a series of meetings to help define more specific
parameters for development to be included in new zoning language as well as examine
preliminary concepts for redevelopment of the site. Please come to share your ideas and
feedback on goals and priorities for potential new development of the site.
On: Wednesday -- April 16, 2008
at 7:00 PM
At: Edmonds Conference Center
201 Fourth Ave N., Edmonds
See directions -- other side
Hosted by: A.D. Shapiro Architects
425-778-5400
Meeting Agenda
Review goals from previous
community meetings.
View Presentation:
Mixed-Use Developments --
Neighborhood Village Concept
Present Preliminary Concepts
for Site Development
Meet in groups to
discuss development
goals and priorities
Summarize group outcomes,
update priorities, define
development issues & next steps.
Date / Time / Location
Neighborhood Meeting
Firdale Village Site
Packet Page 653 of 930
Packet Page 654 of 930
Packet Page 655 of 930
Packet Page 656 of 930
Packet Page 657 of 930
Packet Page 658 of 930
Packet Page 659 of 930
Packet Page 660 of 930
Packet Page 661 of 930
Packet Page 662 of 930
Packet Page 663 of 930
Packet Page 664 of 930
Packet Page 665 of 930
Packet Page 666 of 930
Packet Page 667 of 930
Packet Page 668 of 930
Packet Page 669 of 930
Packet Page 670 of 930
Packet Page 671 of 930
Packet Page 672 of 930
Packet Page 673 of 930
Packet Page 674 of 930
Packet Page 675 of 930
Packet Page 676 of 930
Packet Page 677 of 930
Packet Page 678 of 930
Packet Page 679 of 930
Packet Page 680 of 930
Packet Page 681 of 930
AM-2350 7.
Presentation on the Comprehensive Transportation Plan
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:07/21/2009
Submitted By:Conni Curtis, Engineering
Submitted For:Robert English Time:30 Minutes
Department:Engineering Type:Information
Review Committee:
Committee Action:
Information
Subject Title
Presentation on the 2009 Comprehensive Transportation Plan.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
N/A
Previous Council Action
On February 19, 2008, Council authorized the Mayor to sign a Professional Services Agreement
with ICF Jones & Stokes for the update of the Comprehensive Transportation Plan.
On June 3, 2008, the consultant and Staff presented an update to Council on the Comprehensive
Transportation Plan.
On May 12, 2009, the consultant and Staff presented a briefing to the CS/DS Committee on the
Comprehensive Transportation Plan.
Narrative
The City of Edmonds is currently in the process of updating the Comprehensive Transportation
Plan. Under the Growth Management Act, the City is required to perform a major update to the
plan every six to ten years. Our last major update was done in 2002. The plan lists existing
transportation conditions for all users (drivers, pedestrians, bikers and transit users) as well as the
possible improvements to these conditions. The main objective of the Comprehensive Plan is to
identify improvements necessary to provide a system for all modes of transportation that will
function safely and efficiently through the year 2025.
The consultant, ICF Jones and Stokes, and City staff have been working on the update over the last
year. The plan is scheduled for City Council final approval in August 2009. Citizen feedback on
the plan has been obtained at three open houses. The last one was held June 23, where citizens
provided their final comments and preference on a potential source of new revenue to fund
identified projects.
Staff and the consultant will provide a summary of the plan (Attachment 1) and a proposed
funding schedule (Attachment 2) for future transportation improvements, including updated traffic
impact fees. The plan also identifies the City's shortfall in transportation funding and a potential
Packet Page 682 of 930
source of new revenue.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: Draft Transportation Plan
Link: Funding Scenario Summary
Link: Power Point Presentation
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 Engineering Conni Curtis 07/14/2009 03:23 PM APRV
2 Public Works Sandy Chase 07/16/2009 11:17 AM APRV
3 City Clerk Sandy Chase 07/16/2009 11:19 AM APRV
4 Mayor Gary Haakenson 07/16/2009 11:26 AM APRV
5 Final Approval Sandy Chase 07/16/2009 11:28 AM APRV
Form Started By: Conni
Curtis
Started On: 06/17/2009 09:17
AM
Final Approval Date: 07/16/2009
Packet Page 683 of 930
Comprehensive Transportation Plan
Public Review Draft—June 4, 2009
C I T Y O F E DM
O
N
D
S
Inc. 1 8 9 0
Packet Page 684 of 930
Packet Page 685 of 930
City of Edmonds
Comprehensive Transportation Plan
121 5th Avenue N
Edmonds, WA 98020
Prepared by:
710 Second Avenue, Suite 550
Seattle, WA 98104
With support from:
8060 165th Avenue NE, Suite 220 10230 NE Points Drive, Suite 400
Redmond, WA 98052 Kirkland, WA 98033
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT
June 4, 2009
Packet Page 686 of 930
This document should be cited as:
City of Edmonds. 2009. Comprehensive Transportation Plan. Public Review Draft. Prepared by ICF Jones & Stokes. 710
Second Avenue, Suite 550, Seattle, WA 98104. June 4.
Packet Page 687 of 930
June 4, 2009 i
Table of Contents
Chapter 1.Introduction ...................................................................... 1-1
Purpose of the Transportation Comprehensive Plan ........................................ 1-1
Plan Background .............................................................................................. 1-2
Reports, Plans and Records .................................................................. 1-2
Land Use Review ................................................................................... 1-3
Regulatory Framework ...................................................................................... 1-3
Growth Management Act ....................................................................... 1-3
Washington Transportation Plan ............................................................ 1-4
PSRC Plans ........................................................................................... 1-5
VISION 2040 .............................................................................. 1-5
Destination 2030 ......................................................................... 1-5
Transportation 2040 ................................................................... 1-5
Snohomish County Countywide Planning Policies ................................. 1-6
Edmonds Comprehensive Plan .............................................................. 1-7
Public Participation ........................................................................................... 1-8
Original 1995 Transportation Plan ......................................................... 1-8
2002 Transportation Plan Update .......................................................... 1-8
2009 Comprehensive Transportation Plan ............................................. 1-9
Public Open Houses ................................................................... 1-9
Citizen Advisory Transportation Committee ...............................1-10
Walkway Committee ..................................................................1-10
Edmonds Bike Group ................................................................1-10
Intergovernmental Coordination ................................................1-10
Overview of the Transportation Plan Elements ................................................1-11
Chapter 2.Goals, Objectives, and Policies ...................................... 2-1
15.25.000 State and Regional Context ........................................................ 2-2
15.25.010 Streets and Highways ................................................................. 2-2
15.25.020 Pedestrian and Bicycle Transportation ........................................ 2-7
15.25.030 Public Transportation .................................................................2-10
15.25.040 Streetscape ................................................................................2-13
15.25.050 Capital Facilities, Transportation ................................................2-14
15.25.060 Traffic Calming ...........................................................................2-18
15.25.070 Air Quality and Climate Change .................................................2-19
Packet Page 688 of 930
Comprehensive Transportation Plan – Public Review Draft
City of Edmonds ii
Chapter 3.Street System ................................................................... 3-1
Roadway Functional Classification ................................................................... 3-1
Existing Classifications........................................................................... 3-1
Evaluation of Road Functional Classifications ....................................... 3-5
Street System Inventory ...................................................................................3-10
State Highways .....................................................................................3-10
City Streets ...........................................................................................3-10
Speed Limits .........................................................................................3-12
Traffic Control .......................................................................................3-14
Traffic Calming Devices ........................................................................3-16
Parking ................................................................................................3-17
Street Standards ..............................................................................................3-20
Road Conditions ..............................................................................................3-23
Existing Operating Conditions ...............................................................3-23
Traffic volumes ..........................................................................3-23
Level of Service .........................................................................3-23
Future Operations .................................................................................3-29
Travel Demand Forecasting Model ............................................3-29
2015 Conditions without Improvements .....................................3-32
2025 Conditions without Improvements .....................................3-35
Safety Assessment ...............................................................................3-38
Collision History .........................................................................3-38
SR 99 Traffic and Circulation Study ...........................................3-41
Residential Neighborhood Issues ..............................................3-41
Recommended Road Projects and Programs ..................................................3-42
Capital Improvement Projects ...............................................................3-42
Concurrency Projects ................................................................3-42
State Highway Projects..............................................................3-42
Safety Projects ..........................................................................3-42
2015 Operating Conditions with Improvements ....................................3-44
2025 Operating Conditions with Improvements ....................................3-44
Road Project Priority .............................................................................3-50
Traffic Calming Program .......................................................................3-52
Preservation and Maintenance Programs and Projects ........................3-52
Chapter 4.Non-Motorized System .................................................... 4-1
Comprehensive Walkway Plan ......................................................................... 4-1
Walkway Inventory ................................................................................. 4-1
Packet Page 689 of 930
Table of Contents
June 4, 2009 iii
Recommended Walkway Improvements ........................................................... 4-5
Walkway Prioritization Process .............................................................. 4-5
Curb Ramp Upgrade Program ..............................................................4-11
Bikeway Comprehensive Plan .........................................................................4-11
Bicycle Facility Inventory .......................................................................4-12
Recommended Bikeway Improvements ...........................................................4-14
Small Bikeway Projects .........................................................................4-14
Bicycle Loops ............................................................................4-14
Shared Use Lanes .....................................................................4-15
Bicycle Parking ..........................................................................4-15
Large Bicycle Projects ..........................................................................4-17
Chapter 5.Transit and Transportation Demand Management ....... 5-1
Existing Transit Service .................................................................................... 5-1
Community Transit ................................................................................. 5-1
Fixed Route Bus Service ............................................................ 5-1
Rideshare Services .................................................................... 5-7
DART Paratransit ....................................................................... 5-7
King County Metro Transit ..................................................................... 5-7
Sound Transit Express Bus .................................................................... 5-7
Park-and-Ride Facilities ......................................................................... 5-8
Rail Service ....................................................................................................... 5-8
Sounder Commuter Rail ......................................................................... 5-9
Amtrak Service ....................................................................................... 5-9
Amtrak Cascades ....................................................................... 5-9
Empire Builder ............................................................................ 5-9
Washington State Ferries ................................................................................. 5-9
Transportation Demand Management .............................................................5-10
Future Transit Improvements ...........................................................................5-11
Bus Shelters and Benches ....................................................................5-11
Transit Emphasis Corridors ...................................................................5-12
Swift Bus Rapid Transit .........................................................................5-12
Additional Fixed Route Transit Service .................................................5-13
Edmonds Crossing Multimodal Facility .................................................5-13
Chapter 6.Implementation and Financial Plan ................................ 6-1
Project Costs .................................................................................................... 6-1
Revenue Sources ............................................................................................. 6-6
Current Sources of Revenue .................................................................. 6-6
Packet Page 690 of 930
Comprehensive Transportation Plan – Public Review Draft
City of Edmonds iv
Other Potential Financing Options ......................................................... 6-8
Project Prioritization .......................................................................................... 6-9
Program Priority ..................................................................................... 6-9
Implementation Plan ........................................................................................6-10
Transportation Improvement Plan 2010-2025 .......................................6-10
Interjurisdictional Coordination ..............................................................6-12
Contingency Plan in Case of Revenue Shortfall ..............................................6-13
Chapter 7.References ........................................................................ 7-1
Packet Page 691 of 930
Table of Contents
June 4, 2009 v
Tables
Table 1-1.Land Use Summary .............................................................................................................. 1-3
Table 3-1.Miles of Roadway by Existing Federal Functional Classification .......................................... 3-5
Table 3-2.Summary of Existing and Recommended Federal Functional Classifications ...................... 3-7
Table 3-3.Miles of Roadway by Recommended Federal Functional Classification ............................... 3-8
Table 3-4.Inventory of City Streets ..................................................................................................... 3-10
Table 3-5.Inventory of Existing Traffic Calming Devices ..................................................................... 3-17
Table 3-6.Typical Roadway Cross Sections ....................................................................................... 3-21
Table 3-7.Typical Roadway Level of Service Characteristics ............................................................. 3-23
Table 3-8.Level of Service Criteria for Intersections ........................................................................... 3-24
Table 3-9.Level of Service Standards ................................................................................................. 3-25
Table 3-10.Existing PM Peak Hour Intersection LOS ........................................................................... 3-27
Table 3-11.2015 Intersection Level of Service – without Improvements ............................................... 3-33
Table 3-12.2025 Intersection Level of Service – without Improvements ............................................... 3-36
Table 3-13.High Collision Locations ..................................................................................................... 3-39
Table 3-14.Recommended Capital Roadway Improvements through 2025.......................................... 3-43
Table 3-15.2015 Level of Service – with Recommended Improvements .............................................. 3-46
Table 3-16.2025 Level of Service – with Recommended Improvements .............................................. 3-48
Table 3-17.Prioritization Criteria for Roadway Projects ........................................................................ 3-50
Table 3-18.Roadway Project Priority .................................................................................................... 3-51
Table 4-1.Prioritization Criteria for Walkway Projects ........................................................................... 4-5
Table 4-2.Recommended Walkway Projects ........................................................................................ 4-7
Table 5-1.Community Transit Local Bus Routes .................................................................................. 5-3
Table 5-2.Community Transit Commuter Bus Routes .......................................................................... 5-3
Table 5-3.Park-and-Ride Facilities Serving Edmonds .......................................................................... 5-8
Table 5-4.Top Priority Locations for Bus Shelters and Seating .......................................................... 5-11
Table 6-1.Costs of Transportation Projects .......................................................................................... 6-2
Table 6-2.Potential Revenue ................................................................................................................ 6-7
Table 6-3.Potential Revenue from Additional Optional Sources ........................................................... 6-9
Table 6-4.Transportation Improvement Plan 2010–2025 .................................................................... 6-11
Packet Page 692 of 930
Comprehensive Transportation Plan – Public Review Draft
City of Edmonds vi
Figures
Figure 3-1.Access and Mobility Characteristics of Road Functional Classifications .............................. 3-3
Figure 3-2.Existing Federal Functional Classifications ........................................................................... 3-4
Figure 3-3.Recommended Federal Functional Classifications ............................................................... 3-9
Figure 3-4.Speed Limits on City Streets .............................................................................................. 3-13
Figure 3-5.Existing Traffic Control Devices .......................................................................................... 3-15
Figure 3-6.Existing Traffic Calming Devices ........................................................................................ 3-18
Figure 3-7.Downtown Parking .............................................................................................................. 3-19
Figure 3-8.Typical Roadway Cross-Sections ....................................................................................... 3-22
Figure 3-9.Existing Level of Service ..................................................................................................... 3-28
Figure 3-10.Transportation Analysis Zones ........................................................................................... 3-30
Figure 3-11.2015 Level of Service without Improvement ....................................................................... 3-34
Figure 3-12.2025 Level of Service without Improvement ....................................................................... 3-37
Figure 3-13.High Collision Locations ..................................................................................................... 3-40
Figure 3-14.Recommended Capital Road Improvements ...................................................................... 3-45
Figure 3-15.2015 Level of Service with Improvement ............................................................................ 3-47
Figure 3-16.2025 Level of Service with Improvement ............................................................................ 3-49
Figure 4-1.Pedestrian Intensive Land Uses ........................................................................................... 4-3
Figure 4-2.Existing Walkways ................................................................................................................ 4-4
Figure 4-3.Recommended Walkway Projects ...................................................................................... 4-10
Figure 4-4.Existing Bicycle Facilities .................................................................................................... 4-13
Figure 4-5.Recommended Signed Bicycle Loops ................................................................................ 4-16
Figure 4-6.Recommended Bicycle Facilities ........................................................................................ 4-18
Figure 5-1.Fixed Route Bus Service ...................................................................................................... 5-2
Figure 5-2.Access to Local and Commuter Transit ................................................................................ 5-5
Figure 5-3.Access to Local Transit ......................................................................................................... 5-6
Packet Page 693 of 930
Table of Contents
June 4, 2009 vii
Appendices
Appendix A – Public Participation Materials
Appendix B – Traffic Calming Program
Appendix C – ADA Ramp Inventory and Upgrade Priority
Appendix D– Walkway Projects
Acronyms
ADA Americans with Disabilities Act
ADT Average Daily Traffic
BRT Bus Rapid Transit
CAC Citizens’ Advisory Committee
CIP Capital Improvement Program
CTR Commute Trip Reduction
DART Dial-A-Ride Transit
FHWA Federal Highway Administration
FTE full time equivalent
GMA Growth Management Act
LID Local Improvement District
LOS level of service
mph miles per hour
PRSC Puget Sound Regional Council
RID Roadway Improvement District
SEPA State Environmental Policy Act
SP Sidewalk Program
Packet Page 694 of 930
Comprehensive Transportation Plan – Public Review Draft
City of Edmonds viii
SR State Route
ST Sound Transit
STP Surface Transportation Program
TAC Technical Advisory Committee
TAZ transportation analysis zone
TBD Transportation Benefit District
TIB Transportation Improvement Board
TDM Transportation Demand Management
TIP Transportation Improvement Program
TSM Transportation System Management
UAP Urban Arterial Program
UCP Urban Corridor Program
WAC Washington Administrative Code
WSDOT Washington State Department of Transportation
WSF Washington State Ferries
WTP Washington Transportation Plan
Packet Page 695 of 930
Table of Contents
June 4, 2009 ix
Glossary
Access The ability to enter a freeway or roadway via an on-ramp or other
entry point.
Americans with Disabilities Act
(ADA)
A federal act that was passed in 1990 and amended in 2008. ADA
requires jurisdictions to provide accessible sidewalks primarily
through the installation of ADA-compliant sidewalk ramps. The
design requirements address various areas of concern such as curb
alignment with crosswalks, narrower sidewalk width, obstacles such
as utility poles, placement of the sidewalk adjacent to the curb, or
the slope of the ramps. Deficiencies in any of these areas could
render a sidewalk or sidewalk ramp to be unsafe or inaccessible for
the handicapped, or those who generally have difficulty walking.
Arterial A major street that primarily serves through traffic, but also provides
access to abutting properties. Arterials are often divided into
principal and minor classifications depending on the number of
lanes, connections made, volume of traffic, nature of traffic, speeds,
interruptions (access functions), and length.
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) The average number of vehicles that travel on a roadway on a
typical day.
Capacity The maximum sustained traffic flow of a transportation facility under
prevailing traffic and roadway conditions in a specified direction.
Capital Improvement Program
(CIP)
A long-range plan established by a city or county that encompasses
its vision and future needs for capital facilities, including fire, police,
utilities, and transportation. The CIP also establishes the
jurisdiction’s project priorities and funding methods.
Commute trip reduction (CTR) Efforts related to reducing the proportion of trips made in single-
occupancy vehicles during peak commuting hours. CTR efforts may
include carpooling, telecommuting, compressed work weeks, or
using alternative modes to get to work (e.g. walking or biking).
Washington State’s CTR efforts are coordinated through WSDOT
and local governments in counties with the highest levels of
automobile-related air pollution and traffic congestion. Qualified
employers in these counties are required by law to develop a
commuter program designed to achieve reductions in vehicle trips.
Packet Page 696 of 930
Comprehensive Transportation Plan – Public Review Draft
City of Edmonds x
concurrency A requirement established by the Washington State Growth
Management Act that adequate infrastructure be planned and
financed to support a jurisdiction’s adopted future land use plan. For
transportation, adequacy is measured by the impact on a
jurisdiction’s roadway and/or intersection LOS. If an impact is
anticipated to cause the adopted LOS standard to be exceeded,
then the jurisdiction must have a strategy in place to increase
capacity or manage demand (or a financial plan to put that strategy
in place) within 6 years of the transportation impact.
Federal Highway Administration
(FHWA)
A major agency of the United States Department of Transportation
responsible for ensuring that America’s roads and highways
continue to be the safest and most technologically up-to-date.
Functional classification A roadway category that is based on the types of trips that occur on
the roadway, the roadway’s basic purpose, and the level of traffic
that the roadway carries. The functional classification of a roadway
can range from a freeway to principal arterial to minor arterial to
collector to local access.
Growth Management Act (GMA) Adopted by the Washington State Legislature in 1990, and
subsequently amended to require all cities and counties in the state
to do some long-range comprehensive planning. Requirements are
more extensive for the largest and fastest-growing counties and
cities in the state. Such comprehensive plans must address several
required topics, including but not limited to land use, transportation,
capital facilities, utilities, housing, etc. The GMA requirements also
include guaranteeing the consistency of transportation and capital
facilities plans with land use plans.
Highways of Statewide
Significance
Highways identified by the Washington State Transportation
Commission that provide significant statewide travel and economic
linkages.
Level of service (LOS) A measure of how well a roadway or local signalized intersection
operates. For roadways, LOS is a measure of traffic congestion
based on volume-to-capacity ratios. For local intersections, LOS is
based on how long it takes a typical vehicle to clear the intersection.
Other criteria also may be used to gauge the operating performance
of transit, non-motorized, and other transportation modes.
Local Improvement District (LID) Special assessment district in which infrastructure improvements,
such as water, sewer, stormwater, or transportation system
improvements, will benefit primarily the property owners in the
district.
Packet Page 697 of 930
Table of Contents
June 4, 2009 xi
Traffic calming The combination of physical measures and educational efforts to
alter driver behavior and improve conditions for non-motorized street
users. Physical measures may include bulb-out curb extensions,
chicanes, or traffic circles, among other things. Educational efforts
may include pavement markings or increased police enforcement.
Transportation Analysis Zone
(TAZ)
Areas with similar land use characteristics that are used in travel
demand models to assess traffic conditions and operations.
Transportation Benefit District
(TBD)
A geographic area designated by a jurisdiction that is a means to
funding transportation improvement projects; funding sources can
include vehicle license fees, property taxes or sales taxes. The City
of Edmonds has already enacted a $20 vehicle license fee.
Transportation Demand
Management (TDM)
A set of strategies intended to maximize the efficiency of the
transportation network by reducing demand on the system.
Examples of TDM strategies are encouraging commuting via bus,
rail, bicycle, or walking; managing the available parking supply; or
creating a compressed work week.
Transportation Improvement
Program (TIP)
A long-range (6 years) plan established by a city or county that
results from the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) process. The
TIP establishes the jurisdiction’s transportation deficiencies, project
priorities, and possible funding methods.
Transportation System
Management (TSM)
A coordinated approach to the construction, preservation,
maintenance, and operations of the transportation network with the
goal of maximizing efficiency, safety, and reliability. These activities
include making intersection and signal improvements, constructing
turn lanes, improving signage and pavement markings, and
collecting data to monitor system performance.
Travel Demand Forecasting Methods for estimating the desire for travel by potential users of the
transportation system, including the number of travelers, the time of
day, travel mode, and travel routes.
Washington Transportation Plan
(WTP)
A long-range (20 years) statewide transportation plan adopted by
the Washington Transportation Commission. The WTP describes
existing transportation conditions in the state, and outlines future
transportation needs.
Packet Page 698 of 930
Packet Page 699 of 930
June 4, 2009 1-1
Chapter 1. Introduction
The purpose of the Comprehensive Transportation Plan (Plan) is to guide the development of
multimodal surface transportation within the City of Edmonds (City) in a manner consistent with
the City’s adopted transportation goals, objectives, and policies (presented in Chapter 2). The
Transportation Plan serves as the transportation element of the City of Edmonds Comprehensive
Plan. It identifies transportation infrastructure and services needed to support projected land use
within the city through the year 2025, in compliance with the State of Washington Growth
Management Act (GMA) [RCW 36.70A, 1990]. Based upon existing and projected future land
use and travel patterns, the Transportation Plan describes street, walkway, bikeway, and public
transportation infrastructure and services, and provides an assessment of existing and projected
future transportation conditions. It also provides a long range Capital Improvement Program
(CIP) that establishes transportation priorities, addresses transportation deficiencies and guides
the development of the six-year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). The Transportation
Plan identifies safety and mobility improvements for streets, walkways, bikeways, neighborhood
traffic control, and public transportation, as well as preservation, maintenance, and
implementation strategies that include concurrency management and financing. The
Transportation Plan establishes direction for development of programs and facilities that address
the transportation needs for the city through the year 2025.
Purpose of the Transportation Comprehensive Plan
Based upon the directives of the City’s adopted transportation goals and policies, as well as the
requirements of the GMA, the purpose of the Comprehensive Transportation Plan are as follows:
Address the total transportation needs of the city through 2025.
Identify transportation improvements necessary to provide a system that will function safely
and efficiently through the year 2025.
Ensure consistency with the land use adopted in the adopted 2008 Comprehensive Plan.
Packet Page 700 of 930
Comprehensive Transportation Plan – Public Review Draft
City of Edmonds 1-2
Contribute to economic growth within the city.
Provide cost-effective accessibility for people, goods, and services.
Provide travel alternatives that are safe and have convenient access to employment,
education, and recreational opportunities for urban and suburban residents in the area.
Identify funding needs for identified transportation improvements and the appropriate
participation by both the public and private sectors of the local economy.
Comply with the requirements of the GMA and State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA).
Support improvements to major transportation routes outside the city that will reduce through
traffic in the community.
Plan Background
Reports, Plans and Records
This Transportation Plan integrates the analysis and results of numerous plans and prior reports
that have been completed for the City. Information was obtained from the following sources:
City of Edmonds Transportation Element. 2002. Previous transportation plan that established
citywide transportation goals and policies and infrastructure and service needs, which was
updated for this Plan.
City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan. 2008. Current GMA plan that presents the City’s
planned future land use through 2025, and plans and policies established by the City to
support that land use.
Snohomish County Buildable Lands Report. 2008. Identifies where capacity exists to
accommodate future planned land use within cities and unincorporated areas located within
Snohomish County.
City of Edmonds Community Development Code. December 1980, as amended. Provides
City zoning and other land use regulations.
SR 99 Traffic and Circulation Study. 2006. Assesses traffic conditions on State Route (SR)
99, and recommends safety and mobility improvements to be included in the City TIP.
City of Edmonds Walkway Comprehensive Plan. 2002. Evaluates existing sidewalks and
pedestrian facilities throughout the City and proposes comprehensive improvements to the
walkway system.
City of Edmonds Bikeway Comprehensive Plan. 2000. Evaluates existing bikeways
throughout the City, and proposes comprehensive improvements to the bikeway system.
Olympic View Drive / 176th Street SW: Intersection Traffic Analysis. 2001. Evaluates traffic
flow operations and pedestrian safety and access for the intersection, and makes
recommendations for operational and safety improvements.
Packet Page 701 of 930
Introduction
June 4, 2009 1-3
Land Use Review
The Edmonds Comprehensive Plan and Community Development Code guides development and
growth within the city. Future transportation infrastructure and service needs identified in this
Transportation Plan were established by evaluating the level and pattern of travel demand
generated by planned future land use. Future population and employment projections for the
region are established by the Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC). Snohomish County works
with local jurisdictions to determine the expected distribution of population and employment
between cities and unincorporated county. The transportation analysis presented in this
Transportation Plan is based upon these future population and employment projections. Within
the City, the allocation of future housing and jobs growth was based upon the County’s
“buildable lands” assessment, which estimates available land capacity for future development,
according to the amount of vacant and under-developed (based upon zoning) land. Table 1-1
summarizes the existing and projected future land use growth, based upon these assessments.
Table 1-1. Land Use Summary
Analysis Year
Land Use Type Unit Existing (2008) 2015 2025
Single Family Dwelling Units 12,537 13,028 13,723
Multi-Family Dwelling Units 6,742 7,636 8,914
Retail Jobs 2,507 2,751 3,113
Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Jobs 1,191 1,252 1,337
Services Jobs 6,215 6,648 7,265
Wholesale, Transportation, Utilities Jobs 32 34 39
Manufacturing Jobs 69 75 84
Construction Jobs 49 51 57
Government Jobs 29 31 35
Education Students 5,755 6,159 6,733
Park Acres 202 202 202
Marina Slips 668 668 668
Park-and-Ride Spaces 484 484 484
Regulatory Framework
Growth Management Act
Transportation planning at the state, county and local levels is governed by the GMA, which
contains requirements for the preparation of the Transportation Element of a Comprehensive
Packet Page 702 of 930
Comprehensive Transportation Plan – Public Review Draft
City of Edmonds 1-4
Plan. In addition to requiring consistency with the Land Use Element, the GMA requires that the
following components be included in transportation elements:
Inventory of facilities by mode of transport;
Level of service assessment to aid in determining the existing and future operating conditions
of the facilities;
Proposed actions to bring these deficient facilities into compliance;
Traffic forecasts, based upon planned future land use;
Identification of infrastructure needs to meet current and future demands;
Funding analysis for needed improvements, as well as possible additional funding sources;
Identification of intergovernmental coordination efforts; and
Identification of demand management strategies as available.
[RCW 36.70A.070(6)]
In addition to these elements, GMA mandates that development cannot occur unless adequate
supporting infrastructure either already exists or is built concurrent with development. In addition
to capital facilities, infrastructure may include transit service, Transportation Demand
Management (TDM) strategies, or Transportation System Management (TSM) strategies.
Under the GMA, local governments and agencies must annually prepare and adopt six-year TIPs.
These programs must be consistent with the transportation element of the local comprehensive
plan, and other state and regional plans and policies as outlined below.
Washington Transportation Plan
The Washington Transportation Plan (WTP) presents the State’s strategy for developing budgets
and implementing over a 20-year planning horizon. The current WTP was adopted by the
Transportation Commission in 2006 and covers the period 2007 to 2026. The WTP contains an
overview of the current conditions of the statewide transportation system, and an assessment of
the State’s future transportation investment needs. The WTP policy framework sets the course for
meeting those future needs. The WTP Prioritized Investment Guidelines are as follows:
1. Preservation
2. Safety
3. Economic Vitality
4. Mobility
5. Environmental Quality and Health
Packet Page 703 of 930
Introduction
June 4, 2009 1-5
PSRC Plans
The PSRC is the Regional Transportation Planning Organization for the area that includes
Snohomish, King, Pierce, and Kitsap counties, and is responsible for overseeing six-year TIPs
within the region. The PSRC works with local jurisdictions to establish regional transportation
guidelines and principles, and certifies that the transportation-related provisions within local
jurisdictions’ comprehensive plans are consistent with the Regional Transportation Plan and
conform to GMA requirements.
VISION 2040
VISION 2040, adopted by PSRC’s General Assembly in 2008, is the regional strategy for
managing growth, the economy, and transportation in King, Kitsap, Pierce, and Snohomish
Counties. VISION 2040 addresses eight topics: urban growth areas; contiguous and orderly
development; regional capital facilities; housing; rural areas; open space, resource protection and
critical areas; economics; and transportation. Together, these eight parts constitute the policies for
the four-county region, and meet the multi-county planning requirements of the GMA (RCW
36.70A). VISION 2040 seeks to contain the region’s projected growth within urban areas,
creating compact urban communities and vibrant centers of activity.
Destination 2030
The central Puget Sound region’s current long-range plan, Destination 2030, addresses long-term
transportation strategies and investments in King, Pierce, Snohomish, and Kitsap Counties.
Adopted in 2001, Destination 2030 was developed to maintain and expand the regional vision of
a growth management strategy, supporting compact urban areas connected by a high capacity
transportation system. Destination 2030 focuses on preserving and managing the existing
transportation system and ensuring the development of a balanced multi-modal transportation
system that includes choices for private vehicles, public transit, ride sharing, walking and
bicycling, and freight modes. Destination 2030 coordinates the diverse ambitions of the region’s
counties, cities, towns, and neighborhoods, and emphasizes the connection between land use and
transportation to reduce long-term infrastructure costs and provide better links between home,
work, and other activities. Destination 2030 meets requirements governing Regional
Transportation Plans in central Puget Sound.
Destination 2030 was updated in 2007, satisfying new requirements and preparing for more
extensive plan updates in 2010. The updates address emerging transportation trends and enhance
the safety, security and special needs transportation aspects of Destination 2030. The
improvements also add provisions related to congestion management, commute trip reduction,
and environmental mitigation.
Transportation 2040
PSRC is updating the current regional transportation plan, Destination 2030. The new plan,
Transportation 2040, will extend the region’s long-range transportation vision to the year 2040
Packet Page 704 of 930
Comprehensive Transportation Plan – Public Review Draft
City of Edmonds 1-6
and respond to the recently updated regional growth strategy, VISION 2040. The plan is expected
to be adopted in 2010 (PSRC 2009).
Six alternatives—the baseline plus five action alternatives—have been created during the initial
planning process and each includes a funding strategy. The alternatives consider two related
approaches to transportation investment: improving efficiency and strategic expansion. Improving
efficiency means that we make better use of the system to move people and goods and that we
attempt to reduce the demands on the system during peak hour travel. Efficiency also depends on
better use of land to reduce the need to drive and to increase bicycle and pedestrian options. The
updated plan will continue to meet federal and state transportation planning requirements (PSRC
2009).
Snohomish County Countywide Planning Policies
The Snohomish County Countywide Planning Policies are written policies used to establish a
countywide framework from which the county and cities’ comprehensive plans are developed.
The Countywide Planning Policies were originally adopted in 1994 and were last amended in
2008. Future amendments will be in response to changes in the countywide growth strategy,
changes in the GMA, decisions of the Growth Management Hearings Board, and issues involving
local plan implementation.
Countywide Planning Policies include the following:
Policies to implement urban growth areas;
Policies for the promotion of contiguous and orderly development and provision of urban
services;
Policies for rural land use;
Policies for housing;
Policies for the siting of public capital facilities of a countywide or statewide nature;
Policies for economic development and employment;
Fiscal impact analysis;
Policies for transportation.
Transportation policies are intended to guide transportation planning by the county and cities
within Snohomish County and to provide the basis for regional coordination with WSDOT and
transportation operating agencies. The policies ensure that the countywide transportation systems
are adequate to serve the level of land development that is allowed and forecasted.
Packet Page 705 of 930
Introduction
June 4, 2009 1-7
Edmonds Comprehensive Plan
The most current update of the City’s Comprehensive Plan was adopted in December 2008. The
Comprehensive Plan has the following purposes:
To serve as the basis for municipal policy on development and to provide guiding principles
and objectives for the development of regulations.
To promote the public health, safety, order, convenience, prosperity and the general welfare
and values of the community.
To anticipate and influence the orderly and coordinated development of land and building use
of the city and its environs, and conserve and restore natural beauty and other natural
resources.
To encourage coordinated development and discourage piecemeal, spot or strip zoning and
inharmonious subdividing.
To facilitate adequate provisions for public services such as transportation, police and fire
protection, water supply, sewage treatment, and parks.
(City of Edmonds 2008)
The Comprehensive Plan serves as the City’s primary growth management tool. A community
such as Edmonds, with attractive natural features, a pleasant residential atmosphere and proximity
to a large urban center, is subject to constant growth pressures. Growth management is intended
to provide a long-range strategy guiding how the City will develop and how services will be
provided.
GMA requires that jurisdictions plan to accommodate housing and employment forecasts for the
next 20 years within Urban Growth Areas. The City of Edmonds’ share of regional growth by the
year 2025 is 5,420 additional residents (approximately 3,079 residential units) compared to 2000.
By 2025, total population is expected to reach 44,880 residents.
An extensive public process was conducted for the 2004 comprehensive plan update. It included
numerous public workshops, open houses, and televised work sessions both at the Planning Board
and City Council. Three public hearings were held at the Planning Board and two public hearings
were held at the City Council.
The Comprehensive Transportation Plan serves as the transportation element of the City’s
Comprehensive Plan
Packet Page 706 of 930
Comprehensive Transportation Plan – Public Review Draft
City of Edmonds 1-8
Public Participation
The Comprehensive Transportation Plan has included a significant amount of community
involvement at all stages of the planning and development process, starting with the original Plan
development in 1995, and continuing in the major Plan updates that have been completed in 2002
and 2009.
Original 1995 Transportation Plan
When the Transportation Element was initially created in 1995, citizens were encouraged to
participate through completion of questionnaires and involvement in public open houses. In
addition, a six-member Citizen Advisory Committee was established to oversee all aspects of the
plan as it was developed.
The project was launched with a brochure mailed to each of the approximately 14,000 residences
and businesses in the city. The brochure explained the purpose of the Transportation Plan, the
planning process, the components of the plan, and public participation opportunities. The
brochure also contained a mail-back questionnaire through which respondents could identify
problems with congestion, speeding and safety, as well as any other traffic problems that they
perceived. Approximately 150 citizens provided input by returning the questionnaires.
2002 Transportation Plan Update
For the 2002 update of the Transportation Plan, the City implemented a community involvement
strategy that included public open houses and the participation of the Technical Advisory
Committee (TAC) and Citizens’ Advisory Committee (CAC).
Two public open houses provided a forum for the citizens to identify high priority transportation
issues, and to review and provide comments on various components of the proposed
Transportation Plan. Participants in the open houses provided suggestions for improving roadway
infrastructure (i.e. signals, pavement marking, roadway width), transit, and pedestrian access; and
identified issues related to roadway connectivity, speeding and cut-through traffic (with support
for traffic calming), and access issues for disabled citizens.
Two advisory committees, the TAC and CAC, were formed to oversee the 2002 Transportation
Element Update. The TAC was made up in part by representatives from various City
departments, including Engineering, Planning, Public Works, Parks, Fire, Police, and the School
Districts. In addition, the TAC membership included representatives from WSDOT, Snohomish
County, Washington State Ferries, Community Transit, Sound Transit, and the neighboring City
of Lynnwood. Membership in the CAC included representatives from Bicycle Facilities, Parking,
Development, as well as a wide variety of neighborhoods and corridors throughout the city.
Packet Page 707 of 930
Introduction
June 4, 2009 1-9
In addition to the jurisdictions represented on the TAC, the following agencies reviewed the
Transportation Plan: the City of Mountlake Terrace, the City of Shoreline, the Town of
Woodway, and PSRC.
2009 Comprehensive Transportation Plan
Feedback obtained from open houses, citizen committee involvement, and intergovernmental
coordination was very useful to the initial development and subsequent revision of the
Transportation Plan, greatly enhancing its effectiveness. These efforts led to more realistic
assessments of existing conditions and impacts of forecasted growth, as well as the identification
of appropriate measures to address both current and future conditions.
Public Open Houses
Three public open houses were held at Edmonds City Hall to inform the community about the
Comprehensive Transportation Plan and gather comments on transportation improvement
priorities.
The first open house was held on June 19, 2008. The purpose of this meeting was to introduce the
project to citizens, share the existing transportation inventories and existing conditions analyses
that had been completed, and gather input from participants on the transportation issues they felt
are most important. The second meeting was held on March 5, 2009. The purpose of this meeting
was to share the results of future conditions analyses, present the preliminary list of
recommended transportation projects, present that preliminary cost and revenue projections, and
solicit citizen input on project funding priorities. [Description of third open house, at which time
the community will be invited to review and comment on the draft recommended Comprehensive
Transportation Plan, is reserved] Each meeting began with a presentation by project staff,
providing an overview of project objectives, and specifics such as the existing conditions
assessment, potential transportation improvement projects, anticipated costs and available
revenues, and potential funding opportunities. Following each presentation, participants were
invited to view display boards and fact sheets, talk with project staff, and submit comment cards.
Citizen comments helped guide the city staff as they identified project priorities and viable
funding sources, and finalized the Transportation Plan. A third and final open house is planned
for summer 2009
The public open houses were publicized through notice in the City newsletter, City website,
advertisement on the local government channel, and meeting notification in the local newspaper.
Public participation materials used for this update process are included in Appendix A.
Packet Page 708 of 930
Comprehensive Transportation Plan – Public Review Draft
City of Edmonds 1-10
Citizen Advisory Transportation Committee
The City of Edmonds Citizen Advisory Transportation Committee is comprised of eight citizens
who meet monthly with City engineering staff. The purpose of the Committee is to:
Monitor and make recommendations relative to motorized and non-motorized transportation
issues, systems and funding;
Contribute input to updates of the City Comprehensive Transportation Plan and monitor the
efforts to implement the improvements detailed in the Plan; and
Enhance communication with the public with regard to transportation needs.
The Transportation Committee provided transportation recommendations for updates reflected in
this Transportation Plan. City staff worked with Transportation Committee members throughout
the Plan development to update the City’s transportation goals and policies, discuss Plan
elements, and determine how best to produce a balanced multimodal plan.
Walkway Committee
The Edmonds Walkway Committee is comprised of 12 citizen volunteers, who walk frequently
and live throughout the city. Their role is to evaluate criteria such as safety and access to schools
and parks; prioritize proposed sidewalk project based on the criteria; and to provide feedback and
recommendations related to the City Comprehensive Walkway Plan. The Walkway Committee
met monthly from March 2008 through September 2008 and provided walkway recommendations
presented in Chapter 4 of this Transportation Plan.
Edmonds Bike Group
The long-standing group meets monthly to discuss bicycle transportation issues. Membership
includes over 50 residents, with about 10 members who regularly attend monthly group meetings.
Members represent Edmonds and Woodway and are interested in improving citywide bicycle
infrastructure and conditions for bicycle travel. The Bike Group helped establish three bicycle
loop trails as well as a bike map indicating existing local bicycle lanes and where lanes should be
added as part of future roadway improvement projects. The Bike Group’s recommendations are
also included in Chapter 4 of this Transportation Plan.
Intergovernmental Coordination
The following agencies reviewed this Comprehensive Transportation Plan: WSDOT, PSRC,
Community Transit, Snohomish County, City of Mountlake Terrace, City of Shoreline, and Town
of Woodway.
Packet Page 709 of 930
Introduction
June 4, 2009 1-11
Overview of the Transportation Plan Elements
This Comprehensive Transportation Plan includes the following elements:
Chapter 2: Goals, Objectives, and Policies – Presents the transportation goals, objectives, and
policies that guide the assessments of existing and future conditions, and the development of
the Recommended Transportation Plan.
Chapter 3: Street System – Provides an inventory of existing streets, existing and projected
future traffic volumes, assessment of existing and projected future roadway operations, safety
assessment, standards for different street types, and recommended improvements to address
safety and mobility needs.
Chapter 4: Non-Motorized System – Provides an inventory of existing walkways and
bikeways, assessment of needs, strategy for compliance with the Americans with Disabilities
Act (ADA), and recommended improvements to address pedestrian and bicycle mobility and
safety.
Chapter 5: Transit and Transportation Demand Management – Provides an inventory of
existing transit facilities and service, including buses, rail and ferries; and presents strategies
to support transit and commute trip reduction.
Chapter 6: Implementation and Financial Plan – Provides a summary of the projects, project
prioritization, total costs, and financial strategies and projected revenue for recommended
improvements through 2025.
Packet Page 710 of 930
Packet Page 711 of 930
June 4, 2009 2-1
Chapter 2. Goals, Objectives, and Policies
Assessments of existing and future conditions, as well as development of the Transportation Plan,
are guided by transportation goals, objectives, and policies developed by the City. A major update
of the goals, objectives, and policies took place as part of the 2002 update of the Transportation
Element, under the direction of the Citizen Advisory and Technical Advisory Committees. The
goals, objectives, and policies were further refined as part of the 2009 Transportation Plan, under
the direction of the Transportation Advisory Committee.
Goals, objectives and policies are defined under the following major categories:
State and Regional Context
Streets and Highways
Pedestrian and Bicycle Transportation
Public Transportation
Streetscape
Capital Facilities
Traffic Calming
Air Quality and Climate Change
Under each category, the following information is provided:
A.General consists of a general discussion of the context, issues and priorities behind the
development of the goals, objectives and policies for that category.
B.Goals are generalized statements which broadly relate the physical environment to values,
but for which no test for fulfillment can be readily applied.
C.Objectives are specific measurable statements related to the attainment of goals.
Packet Page 712 of 930
Comprehensive Transportation Plan – Public Review Draft
City of Edmonds 2-2
D. Under each objective,Policies are listed that provide specific direction for meeting the
objectives.
The Transportation Element of the Edmonds Comprehensive Plan (Comprehensive Plan) is
guided by the following transportation goals and policies, initially developed for the 1995
Transportation Element and updated in 2002 and 2009. Inevitably, conflict will occasionally arise
between a transportation policy and real-world constraints and opportunities, or even between
two policies. After the specifics of the situation and the purpose of the policies are fully
understood, the conflict will be resolved using the best judgment of the City Council, as advised
by City staff and the Citizen Advisory Transportation Committee.
The following sub-sections define each of the Transportation Policies to guide the development
of transportation in the city, within the broader framework of the Goals and Objectives.
15.25.000 State and Regional Context
A.General. The combination of an increasing population, demand for transportation, and ever
tightening limits on funding has led to a need to plan for future transportation systems that are
more efficient movers of people and goods. Public transportation is expected to play an
increasing role in the transportation system, and state and regional priorities are being shifted
to encourage this goal. For this strategy to work, however, it also requires a commitment to
maintaining existing transportation networks and investments, and to providing connections
between different modes of travel.
B.State Goal: Encourage efficient multi-modal transportation systems that are based on
regional priorities and coordinated with county and city comprehensive plans.
Regional Goal: Strategically invest in a variety of mobility options and demand
management to support the regional system of activity centers.
15.25.010 Streets and Highways
A.General. The street system in Edmonds is established on the Official Street Map and
Arterial System Map. New right-of-way additions occur primarily in subdivisions. Within the
city, three state highways, rail, and ferry facilities serve regional travel.
A significant challenge facing the City is to bring substandard streets to City standards by
providing such facilities as underground utilities, sidewalks, bikeways and landscaping. Key
intersections that are operating at or beyond capacity must be improved.
Feedback from citizens who participated in public meetings has clearly indicated concern
about the types of potential transportation improvements, and the impact of improvements on
existing neighborhoods. By placing an emphasis on providing facilities for bicycles,
pedestrians, and buses, streetscapes can become a friendlier environment for all users.
Packet Page 713 of 930
Goals, Objectives, and Policies
June 4, 2009 2-3
Speed and noise can be problems where arterial streets adjoin residential neighborhoods.
Land use changes frequently occur where major arterial streets are improved.
B.Goal I: Develop transportation systems that complement the land use, parks, cultural, and
sustainability elements of the Comprehensive Plan.
Goal II: Provide transportation services that enhance the safety of the community, maximize
the use of the existing street system, and maintain the unique character of the city and its
neighborhoods.
Goal III: Implement transportation improvements in a way that minimizes adverse impacts
on the natural environment, air quality, climate change, and energy consumption.
Goal IV: Develop transportation improvements that support commuting in a way that
discourages the use of local streets.
Goal V: Prioritize and finance transportation improvements for the greatest public benefit,
emphasizing transit, demand management, and maintenance of current facilities.
Goal VI: Take a leadership role in coordinating the transportation actions of both local and
non-local agencies. Seek to promote creative, coordinated solutions that do the following:
Meet transportation service needs;
Link local transportation networks with regional, state and national
transportation systems;
Increase use of public transit and non-motorized transportation;
Reduce congestion;
Reduce energy consumption;
Provide solutions consistent with the City’s land use and cultural goals, and
sustainability initiatives.
C.Objective 1: Community Standards. The goals of the Comprehensive Plan, the needs
and desires of its citizens, the integrity of its neighborhoods, shopping areas, parks, recreation
facilities, schools and other public facilities are the criteria for measuring the effectiveness
and success of transportation programs and improvements.
Policy 1.1 Locate and design streets and highways to meet the demands of both
existing and projected land uses as provided for in the Comprehensive
Plan.
Policy 1.2 Locate and design street and highway improvements to respect the
residential character of the community and its quality living
environment.
Policy 1.3 Minimize the adverse impact of street and highway improvements on the
natural environment.
Packet Page 714 of 930
Comprehensive Transportation Plan – Public Review Draft
City of Edmonds 2-4
Policy 1.4 Design streets to minimize environmental impacts on established
neighborhoods.
Policy 1.5 Develop roadway design standards with sufficient flexibility to reflect
the differences in character and function of different roadways.
Objective 2: Conservation. Streets, sidewalks and bikeways should be located, designed
and improved in a manner that will conserve land, materials and energy. New streets must
meet minimum City standards and code requirements. Streets and highways should be
integrated into the total transportation system to facilitate the development of public
transportation and increase mobility while reducing travel time and costs of construction and
maintenance, in accordance with the following policies:
Policy 2.1 Design streets with the minimum pavement areas needed, to reduce
impervious surfaces.
Policy 2.2 Include pedestrian and bicycle elements in roadway improvements to
encourage energy conservation.
Policy 2.3 Utilize innovative materials where feasible to reduce impervious
surfaces.
Policy 2.4 Design arterial and collector streets as complete streets that serve
automobile, transit, pedestrian and bicycle travel.
Objective 3: Design Standards. Design requirements for streets and alleys should be
related to needs and desires of the local community within reasonable guidelines for safety,
function, aesthetic appearance and cost. Each new street improvement should be scaled to the
density, land use, and overall function that the roadway is designed to serve, in accordance
with the following policies:
Policy 3.1 Design local residential streets to prevent or discourage use as shortcuts
for vehicle through-traffic. Coordinate local traffic control measures with
the affected neighborhood.
Policy 3.2 Periodically review functional classifications of city streets, and adjust
the classifications when appropriate.
Policy 3.3 Provide on-street parking as a secondary street function, only in
specifically designated areas such as in the downtown business district
and in residential areas where onsite parking is limited. Streets should
not be designed to provide on-street parking as a primary function,
particularly in areas with frequent transit service
Policy 3.4 Encourage parking on one side rather than both sides of streets with
narrow rights-of-way.
Packet Page 715 of 930
Goals, Objectives, and Policies
June 4, 2009 2-5
Policy 3.5 Design streets to accommodate vehicles which use the street most
frequently, rather than large vehicles which may use the street only
occasionally.
Policy 3.6 Relate required street widths to the function and operating standards for
the street.
Policy 3.7 Include analysis of geological, topographical, and hydrological
conditions in street design.
Policy 3.8 Encourage landscaping on residential streets to preserve existing trees
and vegetation, increase open spaces, and decrease impervious surfaces.
Landscaping may be utilized to provide visual and physical barriers but
should be carefully designed not to interfere with motorists’ sight
distance and traffic, pedestrian, bicycle, and wheel chair safety.
Landscaping improvements should take maintenance requirements into
consideration.
Policy 3.9 Encourage underground placements of utilities at the time of extensive
street improvement.
Policy 3.10 Encourage placement of underground conduit for future installation of
fiber optic cable at the time of extensive street improvement.
Policy 3.11 Design street improvements so as not to impair the safe and efficient
movement of pedestrians and bicycle traffic.
Policy 3.12 Restrict access between non-arterial streets and the SR 99 commercial
corridor to the extent necessary to prevent nonresidential traffic from
entering residential areas, and to maintain efficient traffic flow and
turning movements on SR 99.
Policy 3.13 Design street improvements to encourage downtown traffic circulation to
flow in and around commercial blocks, promoting customer convenience
and reducing congestion. Separate through-traffic from local traffic
circulation to encourage and support customer access.
Policy 3.14 Carefully review parking requirements for downtown development
proposals; to promote the development while still ensuring adequate
balance between parking supply and demand.
Policy 3.15 Provide access between private property and the public street system that
is safe and convenient, and incorporates the following considerations:
a. Limit and provide access to the street network in a manner consistent
with the function and purpose of each roadway. Encourage the
preparation of comprehensive access plans and consolidation of
access points in commercial and residential areas through shared
driveways and local access streets.
Packet Page 716 of 930
Comprehensive Transportation Plan – Public Review Draft
City of Edmonds 2-6
b. Require new development to consolidate and minimize access points
along all state highways, principal arterials, and minor arterials.
c. Place a high priority on consolidating existing access points onto all
arterial streets in the city. This effort should be coordinated with
local business and property owners in conjunction with
improvements to the arterial system and redevelopment of adjacent
land parcels.
d. Design the street system so that the majority of direct residential
access is provided via local streets.
e. For access onto state highways, implement Chapter 468-52 of the
Washington Administrative Code (WAC), Highway Access
Management -- Access Control Classification System and Standards.
Policy 3.16 Encourage underground parking as part of new development.
Objective 4: Circulation. Circulation and connectivity throughout the city should be via
the system of arterial and collector streets, bikeways and pedestrian paths. Local streets
should be utilized for local property access and designed in a manner to discourage cut-
through vehicular traffic.
Policy 4.1 Encourage the efficient movement of people and goods through an
effective and inter-connected collector and arterial street system.
Policy 4.2 Complete the arterial sidewalk system according to the following priority
list:
a. Arterial roadways without sidewalks or shoulders on which transit
service is provided;
b. Arterial roadways without sidewalks or shoulders on which transit
service is not provided;
c. Arterial roadways without sidewalks or shoulders on which transit
service is not provided;
d. Arterial roadways with shoulders too narrow or in or poor walking
condition for pedestrians;
e. Arterial roadways with adequate shoulders for pedestrians but
without sidewalks; and
f. The remainder of the arterial roadway system (e.g. roads with
sidewalks along one side, or roads with sidewalks in disrepair).
Policy 4.3 Design streets to accommodate emergency service vehicles.
Policy 4.4 Coordinate traffic signals located within ½ mile of each other to decrease
delay and improve operations.
Packet Page 717 of 930
Goals, Objectives, and Policies
June 4, 2009 2-7
Objective 5: New Development. Improve traffic safety and reduce congestion through
appropriate street design and site layout during the development process.
Policy 5.1 Require new development to dedicate adequate street rights-of-way for
public streets as specified by City Standards.
Policy 5.2 Use public rights-of-way only for public purposes. The private use of a
public right-of-way is prohibited unless expressly granted by the City.
Policy 5.3 Acquire easements and/or development rights in lieu of rights-of-way for
installation of some smaller facilities such as sidewalks and bikeways.
Policy 5.4 Convert private streets to public streets only when:
a. The City Council has determined that a public benefit would result.
b. The street has been improved to the appropriate City public street
standard.
c. The City Engineer has determined that conversion will have minimal
effect on the City’s street maintenance budget.
d. In the case that the conversion is initiated by the owner(s) of the
road, that the owner(s) finance the survey and legal work required
for the conversion.
15.25.020 Pedestrian and Bicycle Transportation
A.General. Walking and bicycling are beneficial forms of recreation, transportation, and a
means of maintaining physical fitness, in addition to an excellent means of exploring the
community. Carefully targeted investments in the city’s non-motorized network have the
potential to provide an enhanced level of accessibility and mobility to residents at a relatively
low cost. With geographically strategic investments in facilities such as sidewalks,
crosswalks, bicycle paths and bicycle lanes, many short trips that are currently taken by car
could be shifted to walking or bicycling trips.
Recreational walkways are discussed in the City of Edmonds Comprehensive Walkway Plan
(summarized in Chapter 4 of this Transportation Plan) and incorporate existing sidewalks and
natural trails. Sidewalks exist on many major streets but some improvements are needed as
well as addition of these facilities on several important routes.
Although bicycling has rapidly expanded as a recreational activity in the community, it is also
an important means of transportation. For many people, it provides the only available form of
local transportation. The Bikeway Comprehensive Plan (summarized in Chapter 4 of this
Transportation Plan) provides guidance and prioritizes bicycle improvements throughout the
city.
Packet Page 718 of 930
Comprehensive Transportation Plan – Public Review Draft
City of Edmonds 2-8
Planning for and implementing a connected system of walkways and bikeways is a way to
promote community health, as recognized in the “Community Sustainability Element” of the
Comprehensive Plan currently being developed by the City.
B.Goal VII: Improve non-motorized transportation facilities and services.
C.Objective 6: Sidewalks. Provide safe, efficient and attractive pedestrian facilities as an
essential element of the city circulation and recreation system. Safe walkways must be an
integral part of the City’s street and recreation plans to encourage and promote walking for
both transportation and recreational purposes.
Policy 6.1 Construct pedestrian facilities on all streets and highways;
interconnecting with other modes of transportation.
Policy 6.2 Design sidewalks for use by people at all mobility levels. Sidewalks and
curb cuts should meet the requirements of the ADA.
Policy 6.3 Construct sidewalks with durable materials.
Policy 6.4 Construct sidewalks in an ecologically friendly manner, encouraging the
use of pervious paving materials where feasible.
Policy 6.5 Locate sidewalk amenities, including but not limited to poles, benches,
planters, trashcans, bike racks, and awnings, so as to not obstruct non-
motorized traffic or transit access.
Policy 6.6 Place highest priority on provision of lighting on sidewalks and
crosswalks that regularly carry non-motorized traffic at night.
Policy 6.7 Locate sidewalks to facilitate community access to parks, schools,
neighborhoods, and shopping centers.
Policy 6.8 Locate sidewalks along transit routes to provide easy access to transit
stops.
Policy 6.9 Implement a curb ramp retrofit program to upgrade existing sub-standard
pedestrian ramps and curb cuts to meet the requirements of the ADA.
Policy 6.10 Maintain existing public sidewalks.
Policy 6.11 Place highest priority on pedestrian safety in areas frequented by
children, such as near schools, parks, and playgrounds. Provide
walkways in these areas at every opportunity.
Policy 6.12 Periodically review and update walkway construction priorities in the
Transportation Plan.
Policy 6.13 Design pedestrian improvements to include curbs, gutters and sidewalks,
in accordance with the City’s Urban Design Plan and Street Tree Plan.
Provide landscaped buffers between the curb and sidewalk, where
appropriate, with adequate levels of illumination and low water
Packet Page 719 of 930
Goals, Objectives, and Policies
June 4, 2009 2-9
requirements. The landscape buffers must not obstruct minimum sight
distances.
Policy 6.14 Require all development to provide sidewalks along street frontages to
complete missing links, increase pedestrian safety, and provide linkages
to key destinations, as a condition of development approval in
accordance with Edmonds Community Development Code.
Policy 6.15 Conduct pedestrian safety studies at locations where regular pedestrian
crossings are observed along unstriped stretches of road. Install
crosswalks at locations where the study indicates they are warranted, and
where a minimum sight distance between pedestrians and drivers are
met.
Policy 6.16 Encourage the use of innovative crosswalk treatments, such as pedestrian
actuated flashing signals or pedestrian crossing flags.
Policy 6.17 Encourage collaboration between the Engineering and Parks departments
to develop a network of walkways throughout the city. This network
could include but not be limited to signed loop trails in neighborhoods,
park-to-park walkways, and theme-related walks.
Policy 6.18 Encourage separation of walkways from bikeways, where feasible.
Policy 6.19 Provide a complete sidewalk network in commercial areas, especially
downtown, as an element of public open space that supports pedestrian
and commercial activity.
Objective 7: Bicycle Facilities. Provide safe and efficient bicycle facilities as an essential
element of the city circulation and recreation system. Safe bicycle facilities must be an
integral part of the City’s street and recreation plans to encourage and promote bicycling for
both transportation and recreational purposes.
Policy 7.1 Seek opportunities to improve safety for those who bicycle in the city.
Policy 7.2 Place highest priority for improvements to bicycle facilities near schools,
commercial districts, and transit facilities.
Policy 7.3 Provide connections to bicycle facilities in adjacent jurisdictions.
Policy 7.4 Provide bicycle lanes on arterial streets, where feasible, to encourage the
use of bicycles for transportation and recreation purposes.
Policy 7.5 Identify bicycle routes through signage.
Policy 7.6 Provide bicycle racks or bicycle lockers in commercial, school, and
recreational areas.
Policy 7.7 Ensure that existing public bicycle facilities are maintained, and
upgraded when feasible.
Packet Page 720 of 930
Comprehensive Transportation Plan – Public Review Draft
City of Edmonds 2-10
15.25.030 Public Transportation
A.General. The City is well served by public transportation providers including Community
Transit, Sound Transit, Amtrak, Washington State Ferries and the Edmonds School District.
Transportation options include bus, van, ferry, and rail.
Public transportation provides a range of benefits for our community:
Primary mobility for those who cannot drive, including many of our youth,
seniors, and citizens with disabilities
Mobility options for people who choose not to drive – either to avoid
congestion, save money, or support the environment
Preserves the quality of our environment by conserving energy, supporting
better air quality, and reducing congestion on our roadways
Community Transit is the primary public transit provider in Edmonds, offering local and
commuter bus services, specialized door-to-door transportation for persons with disabilities,
commuter vanpools, carpool matching, park-and-ride lots, transportation consulting for
employers, training programs for youth, seniors and persons with disabilities, and overall
customer assistance. Sound Transit (Commuter Rail Station) provides rail and bus service
between Everett, Seattle, and Tacoma. King County Metro does not provide local service
within the city, but connections are available between Community Transit and Metro routes
at the Aurora Village Transit Center.
Additionally, the Washington State Ferry system provides ferry service between Edmonds
and the City of Kingston on the Olympic Peninsula; and Amtrak provides intercity rail
service. The Edmonds School District provides bus service to schools. Additionally, some
school bus service is provided by Community Transit.
The location of the city along Puget Sound with the convergence of the state ferry terminal,
passenger rail service, a highway of statewide significance SR 104, bus service, and a
pedestrian and bicycle network, offers unique opportunities for coordinated service as the hub
of a public transportation network. The potential for multi-modal transportation facilities
should continue to be examined and evaluated.
B.Goal VIII: The public transportation system should provide alternatives for transportation
that enable all persons to have reasonable access to locations of employment, health care,
education, and community business and recreational facilities.
Goal IX: Enhance the movement of people, services and goods. Transportation system
improvements should encourage the use of travel alternatives to the single occupancy vehicle.
C.Objective 8: Operations. Enhance public transit options and operations to provide
alternatives to the automobile and as a means of reducing air pollution, conserving energy,
and relieving traffic congestion in accordance with the following policies:
Packet Page 721 of 930
Goals, Objectives, and Policies
June 4, 2009 2-11
Policy 8.1 Work with transit providers to ensure that transit service within the city
is:
a. Convenient and flexible to meet community needs;
b. Dependable, affordable, and maintains regular schedules;
c. Provides adequate service during evening hours, weekends, and
holidays; and
d. Comfortable and safe for all users.
Policy 8.2 Work with transit providers to ensure that public transit is accessible
within reasonable distance of any address in the system area. A desirable
maximum distance is 0.25 mile.
Policy 8.3 Work with transit providers to serve designated activity centers with
appropriate levels of transit service. Transit stops should be properly
located throughout the activity center, and designed to serve local
commuting and activity patterns, and significant concentrations of
employment.
Policy 8.4 Design new development and redevelopment in activity centers to
provide pedestrian access to transit.
Policy 8.5 Works with transit providers to coordinate public transit with school
district transportation systems to provide transportation for school
children.
Policy 8.6 Integrate existing ferry terminal, urban design and feasibility studies into
the City planning process for the planned relocation of the ferry dock to
serve future transportation needs while maintaining the community’s
character.
Policy 8.7 Coordinate and link ferry, rail, bus, auto, and non-motorized travel to
form a multi-modal system providing access to regional transportation
systems while ensuring the quality, safety, and integrity of local
commercial districts and residential neighborhoods.
Policy 8.8 Develop a multi-modal transportation center along the
downtown/waterfront of the city that is the focal point for increasing the
capacity, interconnectivity, and efficiency of moving people and goods
along state and interstate highway routes, intercity passenger and
commuter railroad systems, public transit system, and local and regional
bikeways and bike routes.
Policy 8.9 Locate and design a multi-modal transportation center and terminal to
serve the city’s needs with the following elements:
Packet Page 722 of 930
Comprehensive Transportation Plan – Public Review Draft
City of Edmonds 2-12
A ferry terminal that meets the operational requirements to
accommodate forecast ridership demand and that provides proper
separation of automobile, bicycle and walk-on passenger loading;
A train station that meets intercity passenger service and commuter
rail loading requirements, and provides the requisite amenities such
as waiting areas, storage and bicycle lockers;
A transit center that meets the local and regional transit system
requirements;
A linkage between stations/terminals that meets the operational and
safety requirements of each mode, including a link between the
multi-modal station terminal to the business/commerce center in
downtown Edmonds;
Safety features that include better separation between train traffic
and other modes of travel, particularly vehicle and passenger ferry
traffic as well as the general public.
Policy 8.10 Encourage joint public/private efforts to participate in transportation
demand management and traffic reduction strategies.
Policy 8.11 Work with other government agencies that cause additional
transportation impacts or costs to the City, so that the agencies mitigate
the impacts and/or defray the costs.
Policy 8.12 Explore future funding for a city-based circulator bus that provides local
shuttle service between neighborhoods (Firdale Village, Perrinville, Five
Corners, Westgate) and downtown.
Objective 9: Coordination. Coordinate with neighboring jurisdictions, state and regional
transportation agencies, Community Transit, Washington State Department of Transportation
(WSDOT), Washington State Ferries, and Amtrak in the development and location of
transportation facilities.
Policy 9.1 Participate in local and regional forums to coordinate strategies and
programs that further the goals of the Comprehensive Plan.
Policy 9.2 Work with neighboring jurisdictions and regional and state agencies to
coordinate transportation system improvements and assure that funding
requirements are met.
Policy 9.3 Encourage public transportation providers within the city to coordinate
services to ensure the most effective transportation system possible.
Policy 9.4 Coordinate with neighboring jurisdictions and regional and state agencies
to encourage their support of the City’s policies and planning processes.
Packet Page 723 of 930
Goals, Objectives, and Policies
June 4, 2009 2-13
Policy 9.5 Participate on the boards of Community Transit and other public transit
providers, and regularly share citizen and business comments regarding
transit services to the appropriate provider.
Objective 10: Access. Provide safe and convenient pedestrian access to bus stops, and
inter-modal transfer locations, the rail station, and the ferry terminal.
Policy 10.1 Place priority on coordinating bus routes and bus stop sites in City plans
for street lighting improvements.
Policy 10.2 Place priority on corridors served by transit for sidewalk improvements,
especially in locations that connect neighborhoods, parks, schools and
businesses to bus stops. Sidewalks should also be a priority on
connecting roads within 0.25 mile of a transit corridor.
Policy 10.3 Include boarding pads at bus stop sites as part of sidewalk construction
projects, to allow for shelters.
Policy 10.4 Work with Community Transit to provide additional passenger shelters
and benches at bus stops sites within Edmonds.
Objective 11: Roadway Infrastructure. Provide a roadway network that supports the
provision of public transportation within the city.
Policy 11.1 Design Arterial and Collector roadways to accommodate buses and other
modes of public transportation (including the use of high occupancy
vehicle priority treatments, transit signal priority, queue bypass lanes,
boarding pads and shelter pads, and transit-only lanes where
appropriate).
Policy 11.2 Coordinate with local public transit agencies and private transit providers
regarding road closures or other events that may disrupt normal transit
operations in order to minimize impacts to transit customers.
15.25.040 Streetscape
A.General. The City is a place with unique character and beauty. The street system has a
tremendous impact on the scenic quality of our community and should complement our
setting, while supporting our neighborhoods.
B.Goal X: Incorporate streetscape design in the development and redevelopment of city streets
to enhance the scenic beauty of, and help preserve, our neighborhoods. The Edmonds
Streetscape Plan (City of Edmonds 2006), including the Street Tree Plan, shall guide the
development of these design standards, which need to also recognize the unique
neighborhood characteristics.
C.Objective 12: Design Standards. Develop design standards that result in an attractive
street system consistent with the character of the city.
Packet Page 724 of 930
Comprehensive Transportation Plan – Public Review Draft
City of Edmonds 2-14
Policy 12.1 Crosswalks should be eight feet wide.
Policy 12.2 Streetlights should be the main light source for public streets, with the
following minimum standards:
a. The intersection of arterial and collector streets should have a
minimum of two standard street lights with additional street lights
placed at a maximum of 250-foot spacing between intersections;
b. The intersection of residential local streets should have at least one
standard street light;
c. Streetlights and poles should be of a high design quality, with
specifications guided by the Edmonds Streetscape Plan.
Policy 12.3 Street trees should be installed at 50-foot intervals or one per lot
whichever is greater. Plant materials should be specified by the City
Parks Department and maintained in conformance with City policies.
Care should be taken in both the selection and placement of landscaping
materials to protect existing scenic views and vistas.
15.25.050 Capital Facilities, Transportation
A.General. The following goals, objectives and policies address capital facility planning and
financing for projects contained in the transportation element of the Edmonds Comprehensive
Plan. These criteria will serve to guide agencies planning public capital facilities and services
in Edmonds.
B.Goal XI: Provide adequate transportation facilities concurrent with the impact of new
development.
Goal XII: Coordinate the City’s transportation element plans with state, county, and local
agencies.
Goal XIII: Maintain a six-year TIP as part of the capital facilities plan of the Comprehensive
Plan.
Goal XIV: Prepare and maintain a TIP that is financially feasible and financially constrained.
Goal XV: Ensure development pays a proportionate cost of transportation improvements
required to mitigate impacts associated with the development.
Goal XVI: Locate and design transportation facilities in keeping with the community
character, and to be compatible with surrounding land uses and the environment.
C.Objective 13: Inventory. Identify and define the transportation facilities in the city.
Policy 13.1 Maintain an inventory of existing transportation facilities owned or
operated by the City and State within Edmonds; include the locations and
capacities of such facilities and systems.
Packet Page 725 of 930
Goals, Objectives, and Policies
June 4, 2009 2-15
Objective 14: Level of Service. Establish level of service (LOS) standards for City owned
transportation facilities in Edmonds and coordinate with the State on LOS standards for state
owned facilities.
Policy 14.1 The Highway Capacity Manual (Transportation Research Board, Special
Report 209) is the City’s recognized source for roadway LOS definition
and analysis techniques. The quality of traffic operation is graded into
one of six LOS designations, A through F, with LOS A representing the
free flow traffic operation and LOS F representing the worst levels of
traffic congestion.
Policy 14.2 Establish LOS standards which (1) measure the LOS preferred by city
residents, (2) that can be achieved and maintained for existing
development and growth anticipated in the land use plan, and (3) are
achievable with the TIP and Comprehensive Plan.
Policy 14.3 Minimum LOS standards are established as follows. LOS is measured at
intersections during a typical weekday PM peak hour, using analysis
methods outlined in the Highway Capacity Manual (Transportation
Research Board 2000). For intersections of roads with different
functional classifications, the standard for the higher classification shall
apply.
Facility Standard
City Streets Arterials: LOS D or better (except state routes);
Collectors: LOS C or better.
State Routes1
SR 99 north of SR 104: LOS E or better;
SR 524: LOS D or better.
1. State routes designated as Highways of Statewide Significance are not subject to concurrency and thus
no City standard is defined for these facilities. However, to monitor operations on Highways of Statewide
Significance (SR 104, and SR 99 south of SR 104), the City identifies existing or potential future
deficiencies if LOS E is exceeded.
Policy 14.4 When a lower order roadway intersects with one of higher order, apply
the LOS standard for the higher order roadway (e.g., when a collector
and arterial street intersect, the LOS for the arterial street will apply).
Policy 14.5 Use LOS standards to (1) determine the need for transportation facilities,
and (2) test the adequacy of such facilities to serve proposed
development. In addition, use LOS standards for City-owned
transportation facilities to help develop the City’s annual budget and 6-
year transportation improvements program.
Policy 14.6 Reassess the TIP annually to ensure that transportation facilities needs,
financing, and levels of service are consistent with the City’s land use
plan. The annual update should be coordinated with the annual budget
process, and the annual amendment of the Comprehensive Plan.
Packet Page 726 of 930
Comprehensive Transportation Plan – Public Review Draft
City of Edmonds 2-16
Policy 14.7 Work toward development of a multi-modal LOS standard that considers
transit and non-motorized operations as well as automobile operations.
Objective 15: Transportation System Efficiency. Implement a variety of strategies that
respond to the demands of growth on transportation facilities while maximizing the efficiency
of the existing infrastructure.
Policy 15.1 Ensure city transportation facilities and services are provided concurrent
with new development or redevelopment to mitigate impacts created
from such development. Road improvements may be funded with
mitigation fees, and provided at the time of or within six years of
development.
Policy 15.2 Maximize efficiencies of existing transportation facilities, using
techniques such as:
Transportation Demand Management
Encouraging development to use existing facilities
Other methods of improved efficiency.
Policy 15.3 Provide additional transportation facility capacity when existing facilities
are used to their maximum level of efficiency consistent with adopted
LOS standards.
Policy 15.4 Encourage development where adequate transportation facilities and
services exist or can be provided in an efficient manner. Prioritize
location of large trip generators (e.g. community centers, recreation
facilities, shopping, entertainment, public facilities, etc.) within 0.25 mile
of Transit Emphasis Corridors as identified in Community Transit’s Six
Year Transit Development Plan and Long Range Transit Plan.
Policy 15.5 Work with Community Transit to encourage ridesharing at employment
centers.
Objective 16: Coordination. Coordinate transportation planning and programming with
state, regional, county, and local agencies
Policy 16.1 Coordinate with non-City providers of transportation facilities and
services on a joint program for maintaining adopted LOS standards,
funding, and construction of capital improvements. Work in partnership
with non-City transportation facility providers to prepare functional plans
consistent with the City Comprehensive Plan.
Policy 16.2 Regularly coordinate with WSDOT, Washington State Ferries,
Community Transit, King County Metro, Snohomish County, the Town
of Woodway, and the Cities of Mountlake Terrace, Lynnwood,
Packet Page 727 of 930
Goals, Objectives, and Policies
June 4, 2009 2-17
Shoreline, and Mukilteo, to ensure levels of service for transportation
facilities are compatible.
Objective 17: Financing. Establish mechanisms to ensure that required transportation
facilities are financially feasible.
Policy 17.1 Base the financing plan for transportation facilities on estimates of
current local revenues and external revenues that are reasonably
anticipated to be received by the City.
Policy 17.2 Finance the six-year TIP within the City's financial capacity to achieve a
balance between available revenue and expenditures related to
transportation facilities. If projected funding is inadequate to finance
needed transportation facilities, based on adopted level-of-service
standards and forecasted growth, the City should explore one or more of
the following options:
Lower the LOS standard
Change the Land Use Plan
Increase the amount of revenue from existing sources
Adopt new sources of revenue
Policy 17.3 Encourage Neighborhood planning to afford neighborhoods the
opportunity to form Local Improvement Districts (LIDs) to develop
locally based improvements that exceed City standards (e.g. for parking,
median strips, landscaping, traffic calming, walkways or other locally-
determined projects).
Policy 17.4 Seek to balance funding to support multimodal solutions to
transportation needs.
Objective 18: Revenue. Establish mechanisms to ensure that required transportation
facilities are fully funded.
Policy 18.1 Match revenue sources to transportation improvements on the basis of
sound fiscal policies.
Policy 18.2 Revise the TIP in the event that revenue sources for transportation
improvements, which require voter approval in a local referendum, are
not approved.
Policy 18.3 Ensure that ongoing operating and maintenance costs associated with a
transportation facility are financially feasible prior to constructing the
facility.
Objective 19: Concurrency. Ensure existing and future development pays for the costs of
needed transportation improvements.
Packet Page 728 of 930
Comprehensive Transportation Plan – Public Review Draft
City of Edmonds 2-18
Policy 19.1 Ensure that existing development pays for transportation improvements
that reduce or eliminate existing deficiencies, and pays for some or all of
the cost to replace obsolete or worn out facilities. Existing development
may also pay a portion of the cost of transportation improvements
needed by future development. Existing development's payments may
take the form of user fees, charges for services, special assessments, and
taxes.
Policy 19.2 Ensure that future development pays a proportionate share of the cost to
mitigate impacts associated with new facilities. Future development may
also pay a portion of the cost to replace obsolete or worn-out facilities.
Future development's payments may take the form of voluntary
contributions for the benefit of any transportation facility, impact fees,
mitigation payments, capacity fees, dedications of land, provision of
transportation facilities, and future payments of users fees, charges for
services, special assessments, and taxes.
Objective 20: Partnerships. Seek to mitigate disproportionate financial burdens to the
City due to the location of essential transportation facilities.
Policy 20.1 Through joint planning or inter-local agreements, the City should seek to
mitigate disproportionate financial burdens that result from the location
of essential transportation facilities.
Policy 20.2 Seek amenities or incentives for neighborhoods in which the facilities are
located, to compensate for adverse impacts.
15.25.060 Traffic Calming
A.General. Speeding is the single most received complaint regarding traffic. Locations include
arterials, local access and commercial access streets, and in residential neighborhoods.
Citizens have expressed concern about the safety of children walking along roadways or
playing near the street, vehicles entering streets from driveways or at intersections, and cut-
through traffic. The City should establish a systematic and consistent way of responding to
requests for action, while respecting the City’s limited finances and staff resources. The City
must also remain cognizant of the transportation system’s need to carry vehicles efficiently
and effectively.
B.Goal XVII: Respond to citizen requests concerning traffic speed and pass through traffic in a
consistent, systematic and responsive manner, while maintaining the basic function of the
Edmonds street system.
C.Objective 21: Traffic Calming. Maintain a response system to citizen requests concerning
traffic calming procedures by implementing the Traffic Calming program described in this
Transportation Plan (see Appendix B).
Packet Page 729 of 930
Goals, Objectives, and Policies
June 4, 2009 2-19
Policy 21.1 Use a formal written procedure for traffic calming requests, and an
acknowledgement procedure for receipt of request.
Policy 21.2 Use field investigation procedures that include short-term solutions.
Policy 21.3 Use neighborhood speed watch program.
Policy 21.4 Publicize the formal procedure for traffic calming requests (Policy 21.1)
and neighborhood speed watch program (Policy 21.3).
Policy 21.5 Use permanent traffic calming request procedures and evaluation
procedures.
Policy 21.6 Use permanent traffic calming design criteria.
Policy 21.7 Use a permanent traffic calming authorization procedure.
Policy 21.8 Use a permanent traffic calming implementation procedure.
Policy 21.9 Traffic calming measures should be located and designed so as not to
interfere with bus operation, travel speed, or on-time performance.
15.25.070 Air Quality and Climate Change
A.General. The Washington State Clean Air Conformity Act establishes guidelines and
directives for implementing the Federal Clean Air Act Amendments. The Washington
Administrative Code requires local transportation plans to include policies that promote the
reduction of criteria pollutants that exceed national ambient air quality standards.
Environmental quality is recognized as a critical part of what people often describe as the
“character” of Edmonds. In the draft “Community Sustainability Element” of the
Comprehensive Plan, the City recognizes that global climate change brings significant risks
to the community, and that appropriate transportation policies are required.
B.Goal XVIII: Comply with Federal and State air quality requirements.
Goal XIX: Promote transportation options such as bicycle trails, commute trip reduction
programs, incentives for car pooling and public transit, in an effort to meet or exceed Kyoto
protocol targets for reducing global warming pollution.
C.Objective 22: Air Quality. Participate in efforts by Puget Sound agencies to improve air
quality as it is affected by the movement of people and goods through and around the city.
Policy 22.1 Strive to conform to the Federal and State Clean Air Acts by working to
help implement the Metropolitan Transportation Plan of the PSRC and
by following the requirements of Chapter 173-420 of the WAC.
Packet Page 730 of 930
Packet Page 731 of 930
June 4, 2009 3-1
Chapter 3. Street System
This chapter provides an inventory of the existing street system, assessment of existing and
projected future roadway operations, safety assessment, design standards for different street
types, and recommended projects and programs to address safety and mobility needs.
Roadway Functional Classification
Existing Classifications
All streets in the city have a designated functional classification. The functional classification of a
street depends on the types of trips that occur on it, the basic purpose for which it was designed,
and the relative level of traffic volume it carries. The different classifications of roadways serve
different stages of a trip:
Traveler accesses roadway system from origin (access),
Traveler travels through roadway system (mobility), and
Traveler accesses destination from roadway system (access).
The different types of roads that serve these functions are classified as follows.
Freeway – Multi-lane, high-speed, high-capacity road intended exclusively for motorized
traffic. All access is controlled by interchanges and road crossings are grade-separated. No
freeways pass through Edmonds, though Interstate-5 (I-5) runs to the east of the city limits.
Principal Arterial – Road that connects major activity centers and facilities, typically
constructed with limited direct access to abutting land uses. The primary function of principal
arterials is to provide a high degree of vehicle mobility, but they may provide a minor amount
of land access. Principal arterials serve high traffic volume corridors, carrying the greatest
portion of through or long-distance traffic within a city, and serving inter-community trips.
Packet Page 732 of 930
Comprehensive Transportation Plan – Public Review Draft
City of Edmonds 3-2
On-street parking is often limited to improve capacity for through-traffic. Typically, principal
arterials are multi-lane facilities and have traffic signals at intersections with other arterials.
Regional bus routes are generally located on principal arterials, as are transfer centers and
park-and-ride lots. Principal arterials usually have sidewalks and sometimes have separate
bicycle facilities, so that non-motorized traffic is separated from vehicle traffic.
Minor Arterial – Road that connects centers and facilities within the community and serves
some through-traffic, while providing a greater level of access to abutting properties. Minor
arterials connect with other arterial and collector roads, and serve less concentrated traffic-
generating areas, such as neighborhood shopping centers and schools. Provision for on-street
parking varies by location. Although the dominant function of minor arterials is the
movement of through-traffic, they also provide for considerable local traffic with origins or
destinations at points along the corridor. Minor arterials also carry local and commuter bus
routes. They usually have sidewalks and sometimes have separate bicycle facilities, so that
non-motorized traffic is separated from vehicular traffic.
Collector – Road designed to fulfill both functions of mobility and land access. Collectors
typically serve intra-community trips connecting residential neighborhoods with each other or
activity centers, while also providing a high degree of property access within a localized area.
These roadways “collect” vehicular trips from local access streets and distribute them to
higher classification streets. Additionally, collectors provide direct services to residential
areas, local parks, churches and areas with similar uses of the land. Typically, right-of-way
and paving widths are narrower for collectors than arterials. They may only be two lanes
wide and are quite often controlled with stop signs. Local bus routes often run on collectors,
and they usually have sidewalks on at least one side of the street.
Local Access – Road with a primary function of providing access to residences. Typically,
they are only a few blocks long, are relatively narrow, and have low speeds. Local streets are
generally not designed to accommodate buses, and often do not have sidewalks. Culs-de-sac
are also considered local access streets. All streets in Edmonds that have not been designated
as an arterial or a collector are local access streets. Local access streets make up the majority
of the miles of roadway in the city.
Figure 3-1 illustrates the basic tradeoffs that occur between mobility and access among the
different functional classifications of roadways. Higher classes (e.g. freeways and arterials)
provide a high degree of mobility and have more limited access to adjacent land uses,
accommodating higher traffic volumes at higher speeds. Lower classes (e.g., local access streets)
provide a high degree of access to adjacent land and are not intended to serve through traffic,
carrying lower traffic volumes at lower speeds. Collectors generally provide a more balanced
emphasis on traffic mobility and access to land uses.
Cities and counties are required to adopt a street classification system that is consistent with these
guidelines (RCW 35.78.010 and RCW 47.26.090). Figure 3-2 shows the existing road functional
classifications for city streets.
Packet Page 733 of 930
City of Edmonds Comprehensive Transportation Plan
June 2009
Figure 3-1. Access and Mobility Characteristics of Road Functional Clasifications
FREEWAY
COLLECTOR
CULDESAC
LOCAL
MINOR ARTERIAL
PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL
LAND
ACCESS
MOBILITY
Road
Functional
Classification
Increasing access to land uses
In
c
r
e
a
s
i
n
g
mo
b
i
l
i
t
y
o
n
r
o
a
d
w
a
y
No local
access
traffic
No
through
traffic
Complete
access
control
Unrestricted
access
Source: Federal Highway Administration 1989
Packet Page 734 of 930
Main St
76
t
h
A
v
e
W
75
t
h
P
l
W
Oly
m
p
i
c
V
i
e
w
D
r
208th St SW
9 5t
h
P
l
W
212th St SW
220th St SW
Fisher
68
t
h
Av
e
W
F
i
r
d
a
l
e
A
v
e
Dayton St
7t
h
A
v
e
N
10
0
t
h
A ve
W
76
t
h
A
v
e
W
Oly
m
p
i
c
V
i
e
w
D
r
238th St SW
80
t
h
A
v
e
W
96
t
h
A
v
e
W
176th St SW
Bowd
oin
W
a
y
180th St SW
Walnut St
3r
d
A
v
e
S
244th St SW
5 th
A
v
e
S
236th St SW
3rd
Av
e
N
84
t
h
Av
e
W
9t
h
A
v
e
S
238th St SW
200th St SWCaspers St
76
t
h
A
v
e
W
Pug et Dr
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
W
y
Ma
p
l
e
w
o
od
D
r
22 8th St SW
9t
h
A
v
e
N
52
n d A
v
e
W
Meado
w
d
a
l
e
B
e
a
c
h
R
o
a
d
Oly mpic Vie
w Dr
80
t
h
A
v
e
W
88
t
h
A
v
e
W
196th St SW
S u ns
e
t
A
v
e
¾?@104
¾?@99
!"`
¾?@524
Snohomish County
King County
City of Edmonds Comprehensive Transportation Plan
June 2009
Figure 3-2. Existing Federal Functional Classifications
00.51
Miles
Source: City of Edmonds (2008); WSDOT (2008);
Snohomish County (2008)
City Boundary
Railroad
Water Feature
Principal Arterial
Minor Arterial
Collector
Local Street
Packet Page 735 of 930
Street System
June 4, 2009 3-5
Table 3-1 summarizes the total miles of roadway located within the city by existing functional
classification. The table compares the miles of roadway to Federal Highway Administration
(FHWA) guidelines (FHWA 1989). The table shows that miles of minor arterial are slightly
lower than FHWA guidelines, and miles of all other classifications are within guidelines. The
total miles of principal and minor arterial are within guidelines for total amount of arterial.
Table 3-1. Miles of Roadway by Existing Federal Functional Classification
Functional
Classification
Miles of Roadway in
Edmonds
Proportion of Total
Roadway
Typical Proportion based on
FHWA Guidelines1
Principal Arterial 12 7.6% 5% – 10%
Minor Arterial 12 7.6% 10% – 15%
Collector 14 9.0% 5% – 10%
Local Access 119 75.8% 65% – 80%
Total 157
1. Source: Federal Highway Administration 1989.
Evaluation of Road Functional Classifications
Over time, changes in traffic volumes and shifts in land use and traffic patterns may cause the
function of a road to change. Thus, it is important to periodically review the functions city roads
serve, and evaluate whether any changes in classification are warranted. The following guidelines
are used for evaluating the classifications.
1.Average Daily Traffic (ADT) – Roadways with higher functional classifications typically
carry higher traffic volumes. On high volume roadways, the demand for traffic mobility is
more likely to outweigh the need for access to abutting land. Conversely, where volumes are
lower the access function of the street will generally be more important than mobility for
traffic. Traffic volumes alone do not provide the basis for classification, but are used in
conjunction with the other criteria listed below. However, the following ranges are used as
guidelines:
- Minor Arterial Street: 3,000 to 15,000 ADT
- Collector Street: 1,000 to 5,000 ADT
2.Non-motorized use – The accommodation of non-automobile modes, including walking,
bicycling, and transit use is another important measure of a road’s function. Roads with
higher classifications tend to serve more modes of travel. The more travel modes that a street
accommodates, the greater the number of people that street serves, and the more important
that street is to the movement of people, goods, and services throughout the city.
3.Street length – A street that is longer in length tends to function at a higher classification.
This is due to the fact that longer (continuous) streets allow travelers to move between distant
attractions with a limited number of turns, stops, and other distractions that discourage them
Packet Page 736 of 930
Comprehensive Transportation Plan – Public Review Draft
City of Edmonds 3-6
from using streets of lower classification. Longer streets generally supply a higher level of
mobility, compared to other streets that provide more access.
4.Street spacing – Streets of higher classification usually have greater traffic carrying
capacity and fewer impediments to travel. Fewer facilities are needed to serve the traffic
mobility demands of the community due to their efficiency in moving traffic. This typically
means that fewer streets of higher classification are needed, so there will be greater distances
between them. The farther the distance of a street from a higher classification street, the more
likely it is that the street will function at a similar classification. A greater number of streets
of lower classification are needed to provide access to abutting land. Therefore, they must be
spaced more closely and there must be many more of them. It is considered most desirable to
have a network of multiple lower classification streets feeding into progressively fewer
higher classified streets. Based on these guidelines, typical spacing for the different
classifications of roadways are as follows:
- Principal Arterials: 1.0 mile
- Minor Arterials: 0.3 to 0.7 mile
- Collectors: 0.25 to 0.5 mile
- Local Access: 0.1 mile
5.Street connectivity – Streets that provide easy connections to other roads of higher
classification are likely to function at a similar classification. This can be attributed to the
ease of movement perceived by travelers who desire to make that connection. For example,
state highways are generally interconnected with one another, to provide a continuous
network of high order roadways that can be used to travel into and through urban areas.
Urban arterials provide a similar interconnected network at the citywide level. By contrast,
collectors often connect local access streets with one or two higher-level arterial streets, thus
helping provide connectivity at the neighborhood scale rather than a citywide level. Local
streets also provide a high degree of connectivity as a necessary component of property
access. However, the street lengths, traffic control, and/or street geometry are usually
designed so that anyone but local travelers would consider the route inconvenient.
The Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1973 requires the use of functional highway classification to
update and modify the Federal-aid highway systems. Thus, the FHWA and WSDOT have
adopted a federal functional classification system for city roadways. Allocation of funds, as well
as application of local agency design standards, is based on the federal classification. Federal
funds may only be spent on federally classified routes.
Based upon the guidelines provided above, the following changes to functional classifications are
recommended:
Apply for the following federal functional classification upgrade from collector to minor
arterial for the following two road segments:
- 220th Street, 9th Avenue S – SR 99
Packet Page 737 of 930
Street System
June 4, 2009 3-7
- 76th Avenue W, 244th Street SW – 212th Street SW
Apply for the following federal functional classification upgrade from local access to
collector for the following four road segments:
- Dayton Street, 5th Avenue S – 9th Avenue S
- 200th Street SW, 88th Avenue W – 76th Avenue W
- 7th Avenue N, Main Street – Caspers Street
- 80th Avenue W / 180th Street SW, 200th Street – Olympic View Drive
Apply for the following federal functional classification downgrade from collector to local
access for the following road segment:
- Admiral Way, south of W Dayton Street
Table 3-2 summarizes existing and recommended functional classifications for city streets.
Table 3-2. Summary of Existing and Recommended Federal Functional
Classifications
Road Location Existing Recommended
No Recommended Changes
SR 104 (Main Street, Sunset Avenue,
Edmonds Way, 244th Street SW)
Edmonds-Kingston Ferry Dock – East City
Limits
Principal Arterial ---
244th Street SW SR 99 – SR 104 Principal Arterial ---
SR 99 244th Street SW – 208th Street SW Principal Arterial ---
SR 524 (3rd Avenue N, Caspers
Street, 9th Avenue N, Puget Drive,
196th Street SW)
Main Street – 76th Avenue W Principal Arterial ---
3rd Avenue S Pine Street – Main Street Principal Arterial ---
Pine Street Sunset Avenue – 3rd Avenue S Principal Arterial ---
Main Street Sunset Avenue – 84th Avenue W Minor Arterial ---
Olympic View Drive 76th Avenue W – 168th Street SW Minor Arterial ---
212th Street SW 84th Avenue W – SR 99 Minor Arterial ---
220th Street SW SR 99 – East City Limits Minor Arterial ---
228th Street SW 95th Place W – East City Limits Minor Arterial ---
228th Street SW SR 99 – East City Limits Minor Arterial ---
238th Street SW Edmonds Way – SR 99 Minor Arterial ---
244th Street SW Firdale Avenue – SR 99 Minor Arterial ---
5th Avenue S Edmonds Way – Main Street Minor Arterial ---
100th Avenue W, Firdale Avenue, 9th
Avenue S, 9th Avenue N
244th Street SW – Caspers Street Minor Arterial ---
76th Avenue W 212th Street SW – Olympic View Drive Minor Arterial ---
Meadowdale Beach Road 76th Avenue W – Olympic View Drive Collector ---
Packet Page 738 of 930
Comprehensive Transportation Plan – Public Review Draft
City of Edmonds 3-8
Road Location Existing Recommended
Olympic View Drive Puget Drive – 76th Avenue W Collector ---
Walnut Street, Bowdoin Way 9th Avenue S – 84th Avenue W Collector ---
W Dayton Street, Dayton Street Admiral Way - 5th Avenue S Collector ---
208th Street SW 76th Avenue W – SR 99 Collector ---
76th Avenue W, 95th Place W Olympic View Drive – North City Limits Collector ---
Olympic Avenue Puget Drive – Olympic View Drive Collector ---
Maplewood Drive, 200th Street SW Main Street – 88th Avenue W Collector ---
84th Avenue W 212th Street SW – 240th Street SW Collector ---
88th Avenue W 200th Street SW - Olympic View Drive Collector ---
95th Place W Edmonds Way – 220th Street SW Collector ---
226th Street SW 108th Avenue W – Edmonds Way Collector ---
3rd Avenue S Elm Street – Pine Street Collector ---
Recommended Higher Classification
220th Street SW 9th Avenue S – SR 99 Collector Minor Arterial
76th Avenue W 244th Street SW – 212th Street SW Collector Minor Arterial
Dayton Street 5th Avenue S – 9th Avenue S Local Street Collector
200th Street SW 88th Avenue W – 76th Avenue W Local Street Collector
7th Avenue N Main Street – Caspers Street Local Street Collector
80th Avenue W, 180th Street SW 200th Street SW – Olympic View Drive Local Street Collector
96th Avenue W 220th Street SW – Walnut Street Local Street Collector
Recommend Lower Classification
Admiral Way South of W Dayton Street Collector Local Street
Table 3-3 summarizes the miles of roadway by recommended classification. The table shows that
under the recommended classifications, the total proportion of minor arterial would increase
slightly, and the proportion of local access street would decrease slightly, compared to existing
conditions. Figure 3-3 shows the recommended roadway functional classifications.
Table 3-3. Miles of Roadway by Recommended Federal Functional Classification
Functional
Classification
Miles of Roadway in
Edmonds
Proportion of Total
Roadway
Typical Proportion based on
FHWA Guidelines1
Principal Arterial 12 7.6% 5% – 10%
Minor Arterial 15 9.6% 10% – 15%
Collector 14 8.9% 5% – 10%
Local Access 116 73.9% 65% – 80%
Total 157
1. Source: Federal Highway Administration 1989.
Packet Page 739 of 930
Main St
76
t
h
A
v
e
W
75
t
h
P
l
W
Oly
m
p
i
c
V
i
e
w
D
r
208th St SW
9 5t
h
P
l
W
212th St SW
220th St SW
Fisher
68
t
h
Av
e
W
F
i
r
d
a
l
e
A
v
e
Dayton St
7t
h
A
v
e
N
10
0
t
h
A ve
W
76
t
h
A
v
e
W
Oly
m
p
i
c
V
i
e
w
D
r
238th St SW
80
t
h
A
v
e
W
96
t
h
A
v
e
W
176th St SW
Bowd
oin
W
a
y
180th St SW
Walnut St
3r
d
A
v
e
S
244th St SW
5 th
A
v
e
S
236th St SW
3rd
Av
e
N
84
t
h
Av
e
W
9t
h
A
v
e
S
238th St SW
200th St SWCaspers St
76
t
h
A
v
e
W
Pug et Dr
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
W
y
Ma
p
l
e
w
o
od
D
r
22 8th St SW
9t
h
A
v
e
N
52
n d A
v
e
W
Meado
w
d
a
l
e
B
e
a
c
h
R
o
a
d
Oly mpic Vie
w Dr
80
t
h
A
v
e
W
88
t
h
A
v
e
W
196th St SW
S u ns
e
t
A
v
e
¾?@104
¾?@99
!"`
¾?@524
Snohomish County
King County
City of Edmonds Comprehensive Transportation Plan
June 2009
Figure 3-3. Recommended Road Functional Classifications
00.51
Miles
Source: City of Edmonds (2008); WSDOT (2008);
Snohomish County (2008)
City Boundary
Railroad
Water Feature
Principal Arterial
Minor Arterial
Collector
Local Street
Packet Page 740 of 930
Comprehensive Transportation Plan – Public Review Draft
City of Edmonds 3-10
Street System Inventory
State Highways
There are three Washington state routes located within the city.
SR 104 (Edmonds Way) runs roughly east-west between the Edmonds-Kingston Ferry dock
and I-5.
SR 524 (Puget Drive/196th Street SW) runs east-west connecting SR 104 to SR 99, I-5, and
ultimately SR 522.
SR 99 runs north-south on the east side of the city, and is the highest traffic-carrying arterial
in Edmonds. From Edmonds, it runs north to Everett, and south through Shoreline to Seattle
and the Tacoma metropolitan area.
In 1998, the Washington State Legislature passed Highways of Statewide Significance legislation
(RCW 47.06.140). Highways of Statewide Significance promote and maintain significant
statewide travel and economic linkages. The legislation emphasizes that these significant facilities
should be planned from a statewide perspective, and thus they are not subject to local
concurrency standards. (WSDOT 2007)
In Edmonds, SR 104 between the Edmonds-Kingston Ferry Dock and I-5, and SR 99 between the
south city limits and SR 104 have been designated as Highways of Statewide Significance. The
Edmonds-Kingston ferry route is considered to be part of SR 104, and is also identified as a
Highway of Statewide Significance. (Washington State Transportation Commission 2006)
City Streets
The city street system is comprised of a grid of principal arterials, minor arterials, collectors, and
local streets. Table 3-4 summarizes the city roadways currently classified as principal arterial,
minor arterial, or collector. The table shows the existing functional classification, speed limit,
number of lanes, and walkway/bikeway characteristics for each of the roadways.
Table 3-4. Inventory of City Streets
Existing City
Classification Street1 Location
Speed
Limit
(mph)
Number
of
Lanes Sidewalk Bikeway
Principal Arterial Edmonds Way Pine Street – 244th Street
SW
35 – 40 4-5 2 sides None
SR 99 244th Street SW – 212th
Street SW
45 7 2 sides None
Sunset Avenue Pine Street – Dayton
Street
40 4 – 5 2 sides None
Packet Page 741 of 930
Street System
June 4, 2009 3-11
Existing City
Classification Street1 Location
Speed
Limit
(mph)
Number
of
Lanes Sidewalk Bikeway
Sunset Avenue Dayton Street – Main
Street
25 3 2 sides None
244th Street SW SR 99 – East City Limits 40 4 2 sides None
Minor Arterial Caspers Street 3rd Avenue N – 9th
Avenue N
30 2 – 3 2 sides 2 None
Firdale Avenue 244th Street SW – 238th
Street SW
35 2 2 sides None
Main Street Sunset Avenue – 84th
Avenue W
25– 30 2 2 sides Bike route
Olympic View Drive 76th Avenue W – 168th
Street SW
30 2-3 2 sides 2 None
Puget Drive/196th Street SW 9th Avenue N – 76th
Avenue W
30-35 2 – 4 2 sides
mostly 2
None
3rd Avenue N Main Street – Caspers
Street
25 – 30 2 2 sides None
5th Avenue S Edmonds Way – Main
Street
25 – 30 2 2 sides None
9th Avenue 220th Street SW –
Caspers Street
25 – 30 2 2 sides Bike route
9th Avenue N Caspers Street – Puget
Drive
30 3 2 sides 2 None
76th Avenue W 244th Street SW – SR 99 30 2 2 sides None
76th Avenue W SR 99 – 212th Street SW 30 2 – 4 2 sides None
76th Avenue W 212th Street SW –
Olympic View Drive
30 2 2 sides None
100th Avenue W South City Limits – 238th
Street SW
35 2 2 sides None
100th Avenue W 238th Street SW –
Edmonds Way
30 – 35 4 2 sides None
100th Avenue W Edmonds Way – 220th
Street SW
30 2 – 4 2 sides Bike route
212th Street SW 84th Avenue W – 76th
Avenue W
30 2-3 2 sides Bike route
212th Street SW 76th Avenue W – SR 99 30 4 2 sides None
220th Street SW 9th Avenue S – 84th
Avenue W
30 2 2 sides Bike lanes
220th Street SW 84th Avenue W – SR 99 30 2 – 3 2 sides None
228th Street SW SR 99 – East City Limits 25 2 2 sides None
238th Street SW Edmonds Way – SR 99 30 2 2 sides
partially
None
Packet Page 742 of 930
Comprehensive Transportation Plan – Public Review Draft
City of Edmonds 3-12
Existing City
Classification Street1 Location
Speed
Limit
(mph)
Number
of
Lanes Sidewalk Bikeway
244th Street SW Firdale Avenue – SR 99 35 2 2 sides None
Collector Dayton Street Admiral Way – 9th
Avenue S
25 2 2 sides Bike route
Maplewood Drive Main Street – 200th
Street SW
25 2 None None
Meadowdale Beach Road 76th Avenue W – Olympic
View Drive
25 2 1 side
partially
None
Olympic View Drive Puget Drive – 76th
Avenue W
25 2 1 side None
Walnut Street, Bowdoin Way 9th Avenue S – 84th
Avenue W
25 – 30 2 2 sides Bike route
3rd Avenue S Edmonds Way – Main
Street
25 2 2 sides
mostly
Bike route
7th Avenue N Main Street – Caspers
Street
25 2 2 sides
mostly
None
76th Avenue W, 75th Place
W
Olympic View Drive –
North City Limits
25-30 2 1 side 2 None
80th Avenue W 212th Street SW – 220th
Street SW
25 2 1 side None
84th Avenue W 238th Street SW – 212th
Street SW
25 2 Very short
2 sides
None
88th Avenue W 200th Street SW -
Olympic View Drive
25 2 1 side None
95th Place W Edmonds Way – 220th
Street SW
25 2 1 side None
96th Avenue W 220th Street SW – Walnut
Street
25 2 None None
200th Street SW Maplewood Drive – 76th
Avenue W
25 2 1 side None
208th Street SW 76th Avenue W – East
City Limits
30 2 None Bike lane
228th Street SW 95th Place W – SR 99 25 2 Very short
2 sides
None
1. All other city streets not listed in this table are local access streets.
2. Under construction as of spring 2009.
Speed Limits
Figure 3-4 shows speed limits on the functionally classified roadways in Edmonds. The speed
limits range from 25 miles per hour (mph) to 45 mph.
Packet Page 743 of 930
Main St
76
t
h
A
v
e
W
75
t
h
P
l
W
Oly
m
p
i
c
V
i
e
w
D
r
208th St SW
9 5t
h
P
l
W
212th St SW
220th St SW
Fisher
68
t
h
Av
e
W
F
i
r
d
a
l
e
A
v
e
Dayton St
7t
h
A
v
e
N
10
0
t
h
A ve
W
76
t
h
A
v
e
W
Oly
m
p
i
c
V
i
e
w
D
r
238th St SW
80
t
h
A
v
e
W
96
t
h
A
v
e
W
176th St SW
Bowd
oin
W
a
y
180th St SW
Walnut St
3r
d
A
v
e
S
244th St SW
5 th
A
v
e
S
236th St SW
3rd
Av
e
N
84
t
h
Av
e
W
9t
h
A
v
e
S
238th St SW
200th St SWCaspers St
76
t
h
A
v
e
W
Pug et Dr
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
W
y
Ma
p
l
e
w
o
od
D
r
22 8th St SW
9t
h
A
v
e
N
52
n d A
v
e
W
Meado
w
d
a
l
e
B
e
a
c
h
R
o
a
d
Oly mpic Vie
w Dr
80
t
h
A
v
e
W
88
t
h
A
v
e
W
196th St SW
S u ns
e
t
A
v
e
Snohomish County
King County
¾?@524
¾?@99
¾?@104
!"`
City of Edmonds Comprehensive Transportation Plan
June 2009
Figure 3-4. Speed Limits on City Streets
00.51
Miles
Source: City of Edmonds (2008); WSDOT (2008);
Snohomish County (2008)
City Boundary
Railroad
Water Feature
Functionally Classified Roadways
Speed Limits
25 mph
30 mph
35 mph
40 mph
45 mph
Packet Page 744 of 930
Comprehensive Transportation Plan – Public Review Draft
City of Edmonds 3-14
Traffic Control
Traffic signals and stop signs are used to provide traffic controls at intersections with high traffic
volume. These devices aid in control of traffic flow. In addition, these devices help to minimize
accidents at intersections. Figure 3-5 shows the city intersections controlled by traffic signals and
those controlled by all-way stop signs. There are 29 signalized intersections, two emergency
signals, and 43 all-way stop controlled intersections in the city. Intersections located on
Highways of Statewide Significance are maintained by WSDOT while others are maintained by
the City.
Packet Page 745 of 930
Main St
76
t
h
A
v
e
W
75
t
h
P
l
W
Oly
m
p
i
c
V
i
e
w
D
r
208th St SW
9 5t
h
P
l
W
212th St SW
220th St SW
Fisher
68
t
h
Av
e
W
F
i
r
d
a
l
e
A
v
e
Dayton St
7t
h
A
v
e
N
10
0
t
h
A ve
W
76
t
h
A
v
e
W
Oly
m
p
i
c
V
i
e
w
D
r
238th St SW
80
t
h
A
v
e
W
96
t
h
A
v
e
W
176th St SW
Bowd
oin
W
a
y
180th St SW
Walnut St
3r
d
A
v
e
S
244th St SW
5 th
A
v
e
S
236th St SW
3rd
Av
e
N
84
t
h
Av
e
W
9t
h
A
v
e
S
238th St SW
200th St SWCaspers St
76
t
h
A
v
e
W
Pug et Dr
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
W
y
Ma
p
l
e
w
o
od
D
r
22 8th St SW
9t
h
A
v
e
N
52
n d A
v
e
W
Meado
w
d
a
l
e
B
e
a
c
h
R
o
a
d
Oly mpic Vie
w Dr
80
t
h
A
v
e
W
88
t
h
A
v
e
W
196th St SW
S u ns
e
t
A
v
e
&-
&-&-
&-
&-
&-&-
&-&-
èéëìíèéëìíèéëìí
&-
&-
&-èéëìí
&-&-
èéëìí èéëìí
èéëìí
èéëìíèéëìí
&-èéëìí
&-
èéëìí
èéëìí &-
èéëìí èéëìí èéëìí èéëìí
èéëìí
&-
&-èéëìí
èéëìíèéëìí èéëìí
&-èéëìí
èéëìí
&-
èéëìí
èéëíí
&-
èéëìí&-
&-
èéëíí
&-
&-
&-&-&-&-&-
&-èéëìí
èéëìí èéëìí &-
&-&-&-
&-
èéëìí
&-
&-
&-
&-
&-
&-
¾?@104
¾?@99
!"`
¾?@524
Snohomish County
King County
City of Edmonds Comprehensive Transportation Plan
June 2009
Figure 3-5. Existing Traffic Control Devices
00.51
Miles
Source: City of Edmonds (2008); WSDOT (2008);
Snohomish County (2008)
City Boundary
Railroad
Water Feature
èéëìí Traffic Signal
&-All-Way Stop
èéëíí Emergency Signal
Packet Page 746 of 930
Comprehensive Transportation Plan – Public Review Draft
City of Edmonds 3-16
Traffic Calming Devices
Traffic calming devices are physical devices installed on neighborhood residential streets, to
discourage speeding, reduce cut-through traffic, and/or improve safety. Traffic calming devices
are currently in place at many locations throughout Edmonds. These measures have been installed
as part of capital improvement projects, as opportunities were presented, and occasionally in
response to citizen requests.
The following types of traffic calming devices are currently present within the city:
Bulb-outs – curb extensions that are used to narrow the roadway either at an intersection or
at mid- block along a street corridor. Their primary purpose is to make intersections more
pedestrian friendly by shortening the roadway crossing distance and drawing attention to
pedestrians via raised peninsula. Additionally, a bulb-out often tightens the curb radius at the
corner, which reduces the speeds of turning vehicles.
Chicane – series of curb extensions that alternate from one side of the street to the other,
which narrows the roadway and requires drivers to slow down to travel through the chicane.
Typically, a series of at least three curb extensions is used.
Partial closure – involves closing down one lane of a two-lane roadway along with a “Do
Not Enter” or “One Way” sign, in order to reduce cut-through traffic.
Raised pavement markers – 4-inch diameter raised buttons placed in design sequence
across a road, causing a vehicle to vibrate and alert the motorist to an upcoming situation.
Raised pavement markers may be used in conjunction with curves, crosswalks, pavement
legends and speed limit signs. They are most effective when used to alert motorists to unusual
conditions ahead, and are most commonly used on approaches to stop signs, often in
situations where the visibility of a stop sign is limited.
Speed hump – rounded raised area placed across the roadway, which is approximately 3 to
4 inches high and 12 to 22 feet long. This treatment is used to slow vehicles by forcing them
to decelerate in order to pass over them comfortably. The design speeds for speed humps are
20 to 25 mph.
Traffic circle – raised island placed in the center of an intersection which forces traffic into
circular maneuvers. Motorists yield to vehicles already in the intersection and only need to
consider traffic approaching in one direction. Traffic circles prevent drivers from speeding
through intersections by impeding straight-through movement.
Table 3-5 summarizes traffic calming devices located throughout the city. Figure 3-5 shows the
locations of these traffic calming devices.
Packet Page 747 of 930
Street System
June 4, 2009 3-17
Table 3-5. Inventory of Existing Traffic Calming Devices
Location Traffic Calming Device
Dayton Street, between 2nd Avenue S and 7th Avenue S Bulb-Out
Main Street, between 2nd Avenue and 5th Avenue Bulb-Out
Main Street, between 6th Avenue and 8th Avenue Raised Pavement Markers
5th Avenue S, between Main Street and Walnut Street Bulb-Out
238th Street SW, between SR 99 and 78th Avenue W Chicane; Speed Hump
240th Street SW, between SR 99 and 78th Avenue W Chicane; Speed Hump
Caspers Street and 2nd Avenue N Partial Closure (one-way outlet)
76th Avenue W, approaching 216th Street SW Raised Pavement Markers
City Park Access Roads Speed Hump
7th Avenue S, between Birch Street and Elm Street Speed Hump
78th Avenue W, between 238th Street SW and 236th Street SW Speed Hump
166th Place SW, between 74th Place W and 72nd Avenue W Speed Hump
191st Street SW, between 80th Avenue W and 76th Avenue W Speed Hump
215th Street SW, between 76th Avenue W and 73rd Place W Speed Hump
238th Place SW, between 78th Avenue W and 76th Avenue W Speed Hump
Dayton Street and 8th Avenue S Traffic Circle
Main Street and 5th Avenue Traffic Circle
Parking
On-street parking is available throughout most of the city. Parking is accommodated on the street
and in private parking lots associated with existing development. Public parking is provided
throughout the city at no charge to drivers. In the downtown area, parking is limited to three
hours along most of the downtown streets, with certain stalls designated for handicapped parking,
one-hour parking, and unloading parking.
The City has established an employee permit parking program to provide more parking to the
general public in high demand parking areas by encouraging Edmonds' business owners and
employees to park in lower demand parking areas. The permit authorizes permit employees to
park for more than three hours in three-hour parking areas if the parking is part of a commute to
work.
A three-hour public parking lot is provided at the Edmonds Police Department/Fire Department.
Supply is currently adequate to accommodate parking demand. The City will continue to monitor
parking demand and supply and make adjustments as needed. Figure 3-7 shows the downtown
streets on which three hour parking, one hour parking, and handicapped parking are located.
Packet Page 748 of 930
#
#
#
#
#
#!(
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
!!Ç
""D""D
!(Main St
76
t
h
A
v
e
W
75
t
h
P
l
W
Oly
m
p
i
c
V
i
e
w
D
r
208th St SW
9 5t
h
P
l
W
212th St SW
220th St SW
Fisher
68
t
h
Av
e
W
F
i
r
d
a
l
e
A
v
e
Dayton St
7t
h
A
v
e
N
10
0
t
h
A ve
W
76
t
h
A
v
e
W
Oly
m
p
i
c
V
i
e
w
D
r
238th St SW
80
t
h
A
v
e
W
96
t
h
A
v
e
W
176th St SW
Bowd
oin
W
a
y
180th St SW
Walnut St
3r
d
A
v
e
S
244th St SW
5 th
A
v
e
S
236th St SW
3rd
Av
e
N
84
t
h
Av
e
W
9t
h
A
v
e
S
238th St SW
200th St SWCaspers St
76
t
h
A
v
e
W
Pug et Dr
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
W
y
Ma
p
l
e
w
o
od
D
r
22 8th St SW
9t
h
A
v
e
N
52
n d A
v
e
W
Meado
w
d
a
l
e
B
e
a
c
h
R
o
a
d
Oly mpic Vie
w Dr
80
t
h
A
v
e
W
88
t
h
A
v
e
W
196th St SW
S u ns
e
t
A
v
e
¾?@104
¾?@99
!"`
¾?@524
Snohomish County
King County
City of Edmonds Comprehensive Transportation Plan
June 2009
Figure 3-6. Existing Traffic Calming Devices
00.51
Miles
Source: City of Edmonds (2008); WSDOT (2008);
Snohomish County (2008)
City Boundary
Railroad
Water Feature
#
#Bulb-Out
""D Chicane
!!Ç One-Way Outlet
!(Traffic Circle
Speed Hump
Raised Pavement Markers
Packet Page 749 of 930
SR
1
0
4
Main St
SR
5
2
4
3r
d
A
v
e
S
Dayton St
5t
h
A
v
e
S
Su
n
s
e
t
A
v
e
Ed
m
o
n
d
s
W
a
y
3rd
A
v
e
N
6t
h
A
ve
N
Walnut St
2n
d
A
v
e
N
Bell St
4th
A
v
e
N
4t
h
A
v
e
S
Alder St
Daley St
2n
d
A
v
e
S
Maple St
6t
h
A
v
e
S
Su
n
s
e
t
A
v
e
N
Ed
m
o
n
d
s
S
t
5th
A
ve
N
Hemlock Way
Holly Dr
Glen St
Dayton St W
Rai
l
r
o
ad
A
v
e
S
Jam
e
s
St
Howell Way
Homeland Dr
Seamont Ln
Sprague St
Erben Dr
Rai
lro
a
d
S
t
Carol Way
Du
r
b
i
n
D
r
U
n
i
o
n
O
i
l
C
o
m
p
a
n
y
R
d
Su
n
s
e
t
A
v
e
S
Magnolia Ln
Access Rd
Rai
l
r
o
a
d
A
v
e
N
Aloha Way
Rai
l
r
o
a
d
A
v
e
SR
1
0
4
6t
h
A
ve
S
4t
h
A
v
e
S
Alder St
A
c
c
e
s
s
R
d
City of Edmonds Comprehensive Transportation Plan
June 2009
Figure 3-7. Downtown Parking
0 500 1,000
Feet
Source: City of Edmonds (2008); WSDOT (2008);
Snohomish County (2008)
City Boundary
Railroad
Water Feature
15-Minute/5-Minute
Loading/Unloading Parking
Handicapped Parking
1-Hour On-Street Parking
3-Hour On-Street Parking
Employee Permit Parking
Public Parking Lot
Packet Page 750 of 930
Comprehensive Transportation Plan – Public Review Draft
City of Edmonds 3-20
Street Standards
The City has adopted street design standards for residential, business and commercial access
roads, and follows established design guidelines for other streets. The Goals and Objectives of the
Transportation Plan relate street design to the desires of the local community, and advise that
design be at a scale commensurate with the function that the street serves. Guidelines are
therefore important to provide designers with essential elements of street design as desired by the
community. Essential functions of streets in Edmonds include vehicle mobility, pedestrian access,
bicycle access and aesthetics.
Street design guidelines for the City are based on the State of Washington Local Agency
Guidelines for roadway design (WSDOT 2008). These guidelines specify that lane widths should
be 11 to 12 feet depending on the location of curbs and percentage of truck traffic. Left-turn lanes
increase capacity, reduce vehicular accidents, and improve access to adjacent property. Bicycle
lanes should be provided along major traffic corridors, and when striped, should be a minimum of
5 feet in width. Sidewalk widths should be a minimum of 5 feet in low pedestrian volume areas,
and a minimum of 7 feet in high pedestrian volume areas. Landscaped medians are especially
important to soften wide expanses of pavement, to provide a haven for crossing pedestrians, and
to provide aesthetic treatment to streets.
The adoption of design guidelines is advantageous over the adoption of standards in that it allows
a needed flexibility in design that may not be permitted by strict standards. Often when designing
streets obstacles are encountered that require modification in design approach. Impediments
might include topographic features that make road construction difficult or very expensive;
inadequate available right-of-way to allow for all desired features; or environmentally sensitive
areas that require modification to avoid adverse impacts. Additionally, funding or grant sources
may require specific features or dimensions.
The City has adopted street standards covering local access streets (City Edmonds, Street
Standards 2001). Standard details are provided for the following streets:
Residential access (1-2 lots)
Residential access (3-4 lots)
Residential access (5-9 lots)
Multi-family/business/commercial access
Residential/commercial access (10-15 lots or units)
Table 3-6 summarizes typical guidelines applied to the design of different types of roads in
Edmonds. Figure 3-8 illustrates typical cross sections for each functional classification of road.
Packet Page 751 of 930
Street System
June 4, 2009 3-21
Table 3-6. Typical Roadway Cross Sections
I tem Principal Arterial Minor Arterial Collector Local Street¹
Access Control Controlled Partial Partial Partial
Posted Speed (mph) 35 – 50 30 – 35 25 – 30 15 – 25
Number of Lanes 4 – 7 2 – 4 2 – 3 2
Lane Width Interior (feet) 11 11 11 11²
Lane Width Exterior (feet) 12 12 12 N/A
Roadway Width (feet) 46 – 79 24 – 46 24 – 35 22
Curb and Gutter Yes, vertical Yes, vertical Yes, vertical Yes, vertical
Sidewalk Width (feet) 5 – 10 5 – 10 5 – 10 5
Right-of-Way Width (feet) 60 – 100 60 min. 60 min. 40 min.
Parking Lane None Optional Optional Optional
Pavement Type To be designed To be designed To be designed To be designed
Design Vehicle City Bus City Bus City Bus City Bus
Bike Lane 5-foot lanes, when
required
5-foot lanes, when
required
5-foot lanes, when
required
5-foot lanes, when
required
Landscaping Strip None Optional Optional Optional
Drainage Enclosed Enclosed Enclosed Enclosed
1. Standard details for residential/commercial access (10-15 lots/units)
2. 10-ft minimum for residential access with 9 lots or less
Packet Page 752 of 930
City of Edmonds Comprehensive Transportation Plan
June 2009
Figure 3-8. Typical Roadway Cross-Sections
43
Local Street—2 Lanes
Principal Arterial—4 to 7 Lanes
Bike lanes may be added as appropriate.
Minor Arterial—2 to 4 Lanes
Bike lanes and parking lanes may be added as appropriate.
Collector—2 to 3 Lanes
Bike lanes, parking lanes, and landscaping may be added as appropriate.
Packet Page 753 of 930
Street System
June 4, 2009 3-23
Road Conditions
Existing Operating Conditions
Traffic volumes
Daily traffic counts and PM peak hour traffic counts were taken at numerous locations throughout
the city in April 2008. The analysis of existing operating conditions on city roadways is based on
this data.
Level of Service
LOS is the primary measurement used to determine the operating quality of a roadway segment
or intersection. The quality of traffic conditions is graded into one of six LOS designations: A, B,
C, D, E, or F. Table 3-7 presents typical characteristics of the different LOS designations. LOS A
and B represent the fewest traffic slow-downs, and LOS C and D represent intermediate traffic
congestion. LOS E indicates that traffic conditions are at or approaching urban congestion; and
LOS F indicates that traffic volumes are at a high level of congestion and unstable traffic flow.
Table 3-7. Typical Roadway Level of Service Characteristics
Level of Service Characteristic Traffic Flow
A
Free flow – Describes a condition of free flow with low volumes and high
speeds. Freedom to select desired speeds and to maneuver within the
traffic stream is extremely high. Stopped delay at intersections is minimal.
B
Stable flow – Represents reasonable unimpeded traffic flow operations at
average travel speeds. The ability to maneuver within the traffic stream is
only slightly restricted and stopped delays are not bothersome. Drivers are
not generally subjected to appreciable tensions.
C
Stable flow – In the range of stable flow, but speeds and maneuverability
are more closely controlled by the higher volumes. The selection of speed is
now significantly affected by interactions with others in the traffic stream,
and maneuvering within the traffic stream required substantial vigilance on
the part of the user. The general level of comfort and convenience declines
noticeably at this level.
D
Stable flow – Represents high-density, but stable flow. Speed and freedom
to maneuver are severely restricted, and the driver or pedestrian
experiences a generally poor level of comfort and convenience- Small
increases in traffic flow will generally cause operational problems at this
level.
Packet Page 754 of 930
Comprehensive Transportation Plan – Public Review Draft
City of Edmonds 3-24
Level of Service Characteristic Traffic Flow
E
Unstable flow – Represents operating conditions at or near the maximum
capacity level. Freedom to maneuver within the traffic stream is extremely
difficult, and it is generally accomplished by forcing a vehicle or pedestrian
to "give way" to accommodate such maneuvers. Comfort and convenience
levels are extremely poor, and driver or pedestrian frustration is generally
high. Operations at this level are usually unstable, because small increases
in flow or minor disturbances within the traffic stream will cause breakdowns
F
Forced flow – Describes forced or breakdown flow, where volumes are
above theoretical capacity. This condition exists wherever the amount of
traffic approaching a point exceeds the amount that can traverse the point.
Queues form behind such locations, and operations within the queue are
characterized by stop-and-go waves that are extremely unstable. Vehicles
may progress at reasonable speeds for several hundred feet or more, then
be required to stop in a cyclical fashion.
Source: Transportation Research Board 2000
Level of Service Criteria
Methods described in the Highway Capacity Manual (Transportation Research Board 2000) are
used to calculate the LOS for signalized and stop-controlled intersections. Table 3-8 summarizes
the LOS criteria for signalized stop-controlled intersections. LOS for intersections is determined
by the average amount of delay experienced by vehicles at the intersection. For stop-controlled
intersections, LOS depends on the average delay experienced by drivers on the stop-controlled
approaches. Thus, for two-way or T-intersections, LOS is based on the average delay experienced
by vehicles entering the intersection on the minor (stop-controlled) approaches. For all-way stop
controlled intersections, LOS is determined by the average delay for all movements through the
intersection. The LOS criteria for stop-controlled intersections have different threshold values
than those for signalized intersections, primarily because drivers expect different levels of
performance from distinct types of transportation facilities. In general, stop-controlled
intersections are expected to carry lower volumes of traffic than signalized intersections. Thus,
for the same LOS, a lower level of delay is acceptable at stop-controlled intersections than it is
for signalized intersections.
Table 3-8. Level of Service Criteria for Intersections
Average Delay per Vehicle (seconds/vehicle)
LOS Designation Signalized Intersections Stop-Controlled Intersections
A 10 10
B > 10 – 20 > 10 – 15
C > 20 – 35 > 15 – 25
D > 35 – 55 > 25 – 35
E > 55 – 80 > 35 – 50
F > 80 > 50
Source: Transportation Research Board 2000
Packet Page 755 of 930
Street System
June 4, 2009 3-25
The Highway Capacity Manual methodology does not provide methods for analyzing delay,
queues, or LOS of roundabouts. Therefore, LOS analysis for roundabouts is calculated using
methods presented in a FHWA report that provides an approach for estimating the average
vehicle delay at each entry point along the rotary (FHWA 2000). Utilizing this method, the LOS
of the rotary is based upon the average vehicle delay at its most congested entry point. Because
LOS thresholds for roundabouts are not provided in the FHWA report, the Highway Capacity
Manual criteria for stop-controlled intersections (see Table 3-8) is applied, because drivers’
expectations for delay at a roundabout more closely resemble expectations at a stop sign than at a
signal (e.g. a lower level of delay is considered acceptable).
Concurrency and Level of Service Standard
Under GMA, concurrency is the requirement that adequate infrastructure be planned and financed
to support the City’s adopted future land use plan. LOS standards are used to evaluate the
transportation impacts of long-term growth and concurrency. In order to monitor concurrency, the
jurisdictions adopt acceptable roadway operating conditions that are then used to measure
existing or proposed traffic conditions and identify deficiencies. The City has adopted LOS
standards for city streets and state routes in the city that are subject to concurrency. Table 3-9
shows the City LOS standards.
Table 3-9. Level of Service Standards
Facility Standard
City Streets Arterials: LOS D or better (except state routes);
Collectors: LOS C or better.
State Routes1
SR 99 north of SR 104: LOS E or better;
SR 524: LOS D or better.
1. State routes designated as Highways of Statewide Significance are not subject to concurrency and thus no City standard is defined for these
facilities. However, to monitor operations on Highways of Statewide Significance (SR 104, and SR 99 south of SR 104), the City identifies existing or
potential future deficiencies if LOS E is exceeded.
LOS is measured at intersections during a typical weekday PM peak hour, using analysis methods
outlined in the Highway Capacity Manual (Transportation Research Board 2000) and discussed in
the previous section. For intersections of roads with different functional classifications, the
standard for the higher classification shall apply.
Intersections that operate below these standards are considered deficient under concurrency.
Deficiencies are identified either as existing deficiencies, meaning they are occurring under
existing conditions and not as the result of future development, or as projected future deficiencies,
meaning that they are expected to occur under future projected conditions. Concurrency
management ensures that development, in conformance with the adopted land use element of the
Comprehensive Plan, will not cause a transportation facility’s operations to drop below the
adopted standard. Transportation capacity expansion or demand management strategies must be
in place or financially planned to be in place within 6 years of development use.
Packet Page 756 of 930
Comprehensive Transportation Plan – Public Review Draft
City of Edmonds 3-26
Transportation concurrency is a term that describes whether a roadway is operating at its adopted
LOS standard. The adopted standard indicates a jurisdiction’s intent to maintain transportation
service at that level, which has budgetary implications. If a city adopts a high LOS standard, it
will have to spend more money to maintain the roadways than if it adopts a low LOS standard.
On the other hand, a standard that is too low may lead to an unacceptable service level and reduce
livability for the community or neighborhood. Under the GMA, if a development would cause the
LOS to fall below the jurisdiction’s adopted standard, it must be denied unless adequate
improvements or demand management strategies can be provided concurrent with the
development. The key is to select a balanced standard—not so high as to be unreasonable to
maintain, and not so low as to allow an unacceptable level of traffic congestion.
Existing Level of Service
Table 3-10 presents existing PM peak hour LOS for 24 intersections throughout the city. Existing
intersection LOS is also shown in Figure 3-9. The analysis indicates that the following four stop-
controlled intersections are currently operating below the City’s adopted LOS standard:
Puget Drive and 88th Avenue W
212th Street SW and 84th Avenue W
Main Street and 9th Avenue N
Walnut Street and 9th Avenue S
The intersection of 238th Street SW and Edmonds Way is operating at LOS F during the PM
peak hour. It is located on SR 104, which is a Highway of Statewide Significance, and thus is
under WSDOT jurisdiction and is not subject to City concurrency standards. However, the City
still considers exceeding LOS E to be an operational deficiency, and will work with WSDOT to
address issues at this location.
Packet Page 757 of 930
Street System
June 4, 2009 3-27
Table 3-10. Existing PM Peak Hour Intersection LOS
Intersection
Traffic
Control
Existing
LOS
Average
Delay
(sec/veh)
LOS
Standard
Juris-
diction
1 174th Street SW and Olympic View Drive Eastbound
Stop-Control
C 21 D Edmonds
2 Olympic View Drive and 76th Avenue W All-Way
Stop-Control
D 27 D Edmonds
3 196th Street SW and 76th Avenue W Signal D 37 D Edmonds
4 Puget Drive and 88th Avenue W Northbound/
Southbound
Stop-Control
C/F1,2 24/52 D Edmonds
5 Puget Drive and Olympic View Drive Signal B 16 D Edmonds
6 Caspers Street and 9th Avenue N Northbound
Stop-Control
C 24 D Edmonds
7 208th Street SW and 76th Avenue W Signal B 11 D Edmonds
8 212th Street SW and SR 99 Signal D 51 E Edmonds
9 212th Street SW and 76th Avenue W Signal D 50 D Edmonds
10 212th Street SW and 84th Avenue W All-Way
Stop-Control
F2 110 D Edmonds
11 Main Street and 9th Avenue N All-Way
Stop-Control
E2 48 D Edmonds
12 Walnut Street and 9th Avenue S All-Way
Stop-Control
E2 44 D Edmonds
13 Main Street and 3rd Avenue N Signal A 7 D Edmonds
14 220th Street SW and SR 99 Signal D 45 E Edmonds
15 220th Street SW and 76th Avenue W Signal D 48 D Edmonds
16 220th Street SW and 84th Avenue W Signal A 7 D Edmonds
17 220th Street SW and 9th Avenue S Signal B 13 D Edmonds
18 Edmonds Way and 100th Avenue W Signal C 31 (3) Edmonds/
WSDOT
19 238th Street SW and SR 99 Signal B 18 E Edmonds
20 238th Street SW and Edmonds Way Eastbound/
Westbound
Stop-Control
F/D1 80/31 (3) Edmonds/
WSDOT
21 244th Street SW and 76th Avenue W Signal D 48 (3) Edmonds/
WSDOT
22 244th Street SW and SR 99 Signal D 42 (3) Shoreline/
Edmonds/
WSDOT
23 238th Street SW and 100th Avenue W Signal B 12 D Edmonds
24 238th Street SW and Firdale Avenue Signal B 16 D Edmonds
1. For two-way stop controlled intersections, the LOS and average delay is presented for each stop-controlled movement.
2. LOS exceeds standard.
3. State routes designated as Highways of Statewide Significance are not subject to concurrency and thus no City standard is defined for these
facilities. However, to monitor operations on Highways of Statewide Significance (SR 104, and SR 99 south of SR 104), the City identifies existing or
potential future deficiencies if LOS E is exceeded.
Packet Page 758 of 930
Main St
76
t
h
A
v
e
W
75
t
h
P
l
W
Oly
m
p
i
c
V
i
e
w
D
r
208th St SW
9 5t
h
P
l
W
212th St SW
220th St SW
Fisher
68
t
h
Av
e
W
F
i
r
d
a
l
e
A
v
e
Dayton St
7t
h
A
v
e
N
10
0
t
h
A ve
W
76
t
h
A
v
e
W
Oly
m
p
i
c
V
i
e
w
D
r
238th St SW
80
t
h
A
v
e
W
96
t
h
A
v
e
W
176th St SW
Bowd
oin
W
a
y
180th St SW
Walnut St
3r
d
A
v
e
S
244th St SW
5 th
A
v
e
S
236th St SW
3rd
Av
e
N
84
t
h
Av
e
W
9t
h
A
v
e
S
238th St SW
200th St SWCaspers St
76
t
h
A
v
e
W
Pug et Dr
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
W
y
Ma
p
l
e
w
o
od
D
r
22 8th St SW
9t
h
A
v
e
N
52
n d A
v
e
W
Meado
w
d
a
l
e
B
e
a
c
h
R
o
a
d
Oly mpic Vie
w Dr
80
t
h
A
v
e
W
88
t
h
A
v
e
W
196th St SW
S u ns
e
t
A
v
e
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(!(
!(
(C
(D(F(B
(C
(A (E
(E (F (D
(B
(D
(D(D(A(B
(C
(B (B(F
(D (D
(D
¾?@104
¾?@99
!"`
¾?@524
Snohomish County
King County
City of Edmonds Comprehensive Transportation Plan
June 2009
Figure 3-9. Existing Level of Service
00.51
Miles
Source: City of Edmonds (2008); WSDOT (2008);
Snohomish County (2008)
City Boundary
Railroad
Water Feature
(A Level of Service (LOS) Designation
!(Meets LOS Standard
!(Exceeds LOS Standard
!(State Highway - Not Subject to Local LOS Standard
Packet Page 759 of 930
Street System
June 4, 2009 3-29
Future Operations
This section presents the methodology used to forecast roadway operating conditions through
2025, and provides an assessment of those future traffic conditions if no additional improvements
are made to the transportation system.
Travel Demand Forecasting Model
For this Transportation Plan, a travel demand forecasting model was developed to analyze future
travel demand and traffic patterns for the weekday PM peak hour, which is typically the hour in
which the highest level of traffic occurs, and is the time period in which concurrency assessment
is based. The major elements of the model include:
Transportation network and zone development
Existing land use inventory
Trip generation
Trip distribution
Network assignment
Model calibration
Model of future traffic conditions.
These elements are described in the following sections.
Transportation Network and Zone Development
The analysis roadway network is represented as a series of links (roadway segments) and nodes
(intersections). Road characteristics such as capacity, length, speed, and turning restrictions at
intersections are coded into the network. The geographic area covered by the model is divided
into transportation analysis zones (TAZs) that have similar land use characteristics. Figure 3-10
shows the TAZs that were developed for the Edmonds model. The PSRC regional transportation
model was used as the basis for both transportation network and TAZ definitions. For the more
detailed Edmonds model, some larger TAZs from the regional model were subdivided into
smaller TAZs, and the roadway network was analyzed in greater detail. Consistency with the
regional model allows land use and roadway information that was updated in the development of
the Edmonds model to be easily transferred to PSRC for the next update of the regional model.
Existing Land Use Inventory
Existing land use was based on a citywide land use inventory completed for this project in 2008.
In order to establish an accurate base map of existing land use, land use was confirmed using
assessor records, supplemental aerial photos, and field verification. For the model area outside the
city limits, land use was based on regional population and employment inventory provided by the
PSRC. The land use is summarized by TAZ, as shown in Figure 3-10.
Packet Page 760 of 930
Main St
76
t
h
A
v
e
W
75
t
h
P
l
W
Oly
m
p
i
c
V
i
e
w
D
r
208th St SW
9 5t
h
P
l
W
212th St SW
220th St SW
Fisher
68
t
h
Av
e
W
F
i
r
d
a
l
e
A
v
e
Dayton St
7t
h
A
v
e
N
10
0
t
h
A ve
W
76
t
h
A
v
e
W
Oly
m
p
i
c
V
i
e
w
D
r
238th St SW
80
t
h
A
v
e
W
96
t
h
A
v
e
W
176th St SW
Bowd
oin
W
a
y
180th St SW
Walnut St
3r
d
A
v
e
S
244th St SW
5 th
A
v
e
S
236th St SW
3rd
Av
e
N
84
t
h
Av
e
W
9t
h
A
v
e
S
238th St SW
200th St SWCaspers St
76
t
h
A
v
e
W
Pug et Dr
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
W
y
Ma
p
l
e
w
o
od
D
r
22 8th St SW
9t
h
A
v
e
N
52
n d A
v
e
W
Meado
w
d
a
l
e
B
e
a
c
h
R
o
a
d
Oly mpic Vie
w Dr
80
t
h
A
v
e
W
88
t
h
A
v
e
W
196th St SW
S u ns
e
t
A
v
e
¾?@104
¾?@99
!"`
¾?@524
Snohomish County
King County
55
58
62
46
36
27
31
11
57
9
59
22
30
53
37
40
49
24
32
50
54
3515
45
56
43
21
60
52
39
29
47
48
17
34
7
44
25
16
20
51
28
61
42
4
14
23
10
33
26
38
6
3
1
41
8
12
18
13
52 19
City of Edmonds Comprehensive Transportation Plan
June 2009
Figure 3-10. Transportation Analysis Zones
00.51
Miles
Source: City of Edmonds (2008); WSDOT (2008);
Snohomish County (2008)
City Boundary
Railroad
Water Feature
City TAZ Boundaries
Packet Page 761 of 930
Street System
June 4, 2009 3-31
Trip Generation
The trip generation step estimates the total number of trips produced by and attracted to each
TAZ in the model area. The trips are estimated using statistical data on population and household
characteristics, employment, economic output, and land uses. Trips are categorized by their
general purpose, including:
Home-based-work, or any trip with home as one end and work as the other end;
Home-based-other, or any non-work trip with home as one end;
Non-home-based, or any trip that does not have home at either end.
The trip generation model estimates the number of trips generated per household and employee
during the analysis period for each of these purposes. The output is expressed as the total number
of trips produced in each TAZ and the total number of trips attracted to each TAZ, categorized by
trip purpose.
Trip Distribution
The trip distribution step allocates the trips estimated by the trip generation model to create a
specific zonal origin and destination for each trip. This is accomplished using the gravity model,
which distributes trips according to two basic assumptions: (1) more trips will be attracted to
larger zones (the size of a zone is defined by the number of attractions estimated in the trip
generation phase, not the geographical size), and (2) more trip interchanges will take place
between zones that are closer together than the number that will take place between zones that are
farther apart. The result is a trip matrix for each of the trip purposes specified in trip generation.
This matrix estimates how many trips are taken from each zone (origin) to every other zone
(destination). The trips are often referred to as trip interchanges.
Network Assignment
The roadway network is represented as a series of links (roadway segments) and nodes
(intersections). Each roadway link and intersection node is assigned a functional classification,
with associated characteristics of length, capacity, and speed. This information is used to
determine the optimum path between all the zones based on travel time and distance.
The trips are distributed from each of the zones to the roadway network using an assignment
process that takes into account the effect of increasing traffic on travel times. The result is a
roadway network with traffic volumes calculated for each segment of roadway. The model
reflects the effects of traffic congestion on the roadway network.
Model Calibration
A crucial step in the modeling process is the calibration of the model. The modeling process can
generally be described as defining the existing roadway system as a model network and applying
trip patterns based on existing land use. The model output, which consists of estimated traffic
volumes on each roadway segment, is compared to existing traffic counts. Adjustments are made
to the model inputs until the modeled existing conditions replicate actual existing conditions,
Packet Page 762 of 930
Comprehensive Transportation Plan – Public Review Draft
City of Edmonds 3-32
within accepted parameters. Once the model is calibrated for existing conditions, it can be used as
the basis for analyzing future traffic conditions and the impacts of potential improvements to the
roadway network.
Model of Future Traffic Conditions
Future travel demand is based on projections of future land use patterns and community growth.
Based on population and employment forecasts, the City provided these growth assumptions for
the next 20 years. The growth assumptions represent the higher end of possible ranges, resulting
in a more conservative assessment of the impact of future land use on traffic conditions. For the
model area outside the city limits, future land use projections were based on PSRC forecasts.
Using the same general process described for modeling existing conditions, the forecasted land
use data is used to estimate the number of trips that will be generated in future travel. These trips
are then distributed among the TAZs, and assigned to the roadway network. The result is a model
of projected future traffic conditions, under the projected future land use scenario.
For future analysis under 2015 conditions, a straight-line growth between existing and projected
2025 traffic volumes was assumed. This is based on the assumption that steady growth between
existing and planned 2025 land uses will occur.
2015 Conditions without Improvements
Table 3-11 presents projected PM peak hour LOS for city intersections by 2015, with existing
transportation infrastructure in place. Projected 2015 LOS at the analysis intersections is also
shown in Figure 3-11. The following locations are projected to operate below the City’s adopted
LOS standards under the 2015 conditions, if no additional improvements are made to the
transportation system:
Olympic View Drive and 76th Avenue W
Puget Drive and 88th Avenue W (deficient under existing conditions)
Caspers Street and 9th Avenue N
212th Street SW and 76th Avenue W
212th Street SW and 84th Avenue W
Main Street and 9th Avenue N
Walnut Street and 9th Avenue S
220th Street SW and 76th Avenue W
Analysis indicates that the intersection of 238th Street SW and Edmonds Way will operate at
LOS F in 2015. As it is located along a Highway of Statewide Significance, this intersection is
not subject to City concurrency standards. However, the City still considers exceeding LOS E to
be an operational deficiency, and will work with WSDOT to address it.
Packet Page 763 of 930
Street System
June 4, 2009 3-33
Table 3-11. 2015 Intersection Level of Service – without Improvements
Intersection
Existing
Traffic
Control
2015
LOS
Average
Delay
(sec/veh)
LOS
Standard
Juris-
diction
1 174th Street SW and Olympic View Drive Westbound
Stop-Control
D 33 D Edmonds
2 Olympic View Drive and 76th Avenue W All-Way
Stop-Control
F1 93 D Edmonds
3 196th Street SW and 76th Avenue W Signal D 42 D Edmonds
4 Puget Drive and 88th Avenue W Northbound/
Southbound
Stop-Control
F/F1,2 55/236 D Edmonds
5 Puget Drive and Olympic View Drive Signal B 16 D Edmonds
6 Caspers Street and 9th Avenue N Northbound
Stop-Control
E2 37 D Edmonds
7 208th Street SW and 76th Avenue W Signal B 15 D Edmonds
8 212th Street SW and SR 99 Signal E 77 E Edmonds
9 212th Street SW and 76th Avenue W Signal F2 81 D Edmonds
10 212th Street SW and 84th Avenue W All-Way
Stop-Control
F2 172 D Edmonds
11 Main Street and 9th Avenue N All-Way
Stop-Control
F2 89 D Edmonds
12 Walnut Street and 9th Avenue S All-Way
Stop-Control
F2 80 D Edmonds
13 Main Street and 3rd Avenue N Signal A 8 D Edmonds
14 220th Street SW and SR 99 Signal E 72 E Edmonds
15 220th Street SW and 76th Avenue W Signal E2 55 D Edmonds
16 220th Street SW and 84th Avenue W Signal A 9 D Edmonds
17 220th Street SW and 9th Avenue S Signal B 13 D Edmonds
18 Edmonds Way and 100th Avenue W Signal D 36 (3) Edmonds/
WSDOT
19 238th Street SW and SR 99 Signal C 24 E Edmonds
20 238th Street SW and Edmonds Way Eastbound/
Westbound
Stop-Control
F/F1 371/56 (3) Edmonds/
WSDOT
21 244th Street SW and 76th Avenue W Signal E 57 (3) Edmonds/
WSDOT
22 244th Street SW and SR 99 Signal D 50 (3) Shoreline/
Edmonds/
WSDOT
23 238th Street SW and 100th Avenue W Signal B 15 D Edmonds
24 238th Street SW and Firdale Avenue Signal C 21 D Edmonds
1. For two-way stop controlled intersections, the LOS and average delay is presented for each stop-controlled movement.
2. LOS exceeds standard.
3. State routes designated as Highways of Statewide Significance are not subject to concurrency and thus no City standard is defined for these
facilities. However, to monitor operations on Highways of Statewide Significance (SR 104, and SR 99 south of SR 104), the City identifies existing or
potential future deficiencies if LOS E is exceeded.
Packet Page 764 of 930
Main St
76
t
h
A
v
e
W
75
t
h
P
l
W
Oly
m
p
i
c
V
i
e
w
D
r
208th St SW
9 5t
h
P
l
W
212th St SW
220th St SW
Fisher
68
t
h
Av
e
W
F
i
r
d
a
l
e
A
v
e
Dayton St
7t
h
A
v
e
N
10
0
t
h
A ve
W
76
t
h
A
v
e
W
Oly
m
p
i
c
V
i
e
w
D
r
238th St SW
80
t
h
A
v
e
W
96
t
h
A
v
e
W
176th St SW
Bowd
oin
W
a
y
180th St SW
Walnut St
3r
d
A
v
e
S
244th St SW
5 th
A
v
e
S
236th St SW
3rd
Av
e
N
84
t
h
Av
e
W
9t
h
A
v
e
S
238th St SW
200th St SWCaspers St
76
t
h
A
v
e
W
Pug et Dr
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
W
y
Ma
p
l
e
w
o
od
D
r
22 8th St SW
9t
h
A
v
e
N
52
n d A
v
e
W
Meado
w
d
a
l
e
B
e
a
c
h
R
o
a
d
Oly mpic Vie
w Dr
80
t
h
A
v
e
W
88
t
h
A
v
e
W
196th St SW
S u ns
e
t
A
v
e
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(!(
!(
(D
(D(F(B
(E
(A (F
(F (F (F
(B
(E
(E(E(A(B
(D
(C (C(F
(D (E
(F
¾?@104
¾?@99
!"`
¾?@524
Snohomish County
King County
City of Edmonds Comprehensive Transportation Plan
June 2009
Figure 3-11. 2015 Level of Service Without Improvement
00.51
Miles
Source: City of Edmonds (2008); WSDOT (2008);
Snohomish County (2008)
City Boundary
Railroad
Water Feature
(A Level of Service (LOS) Designation
!(Meets LOS Standard
!(Exceeds LOS Standard
!(State Highway - Not Subject to Local LOS Standard
Packet Page 765 of 930
Street System
June 4, 2009 3-35
2025 Conditions without Improvements
Table 3-12 presents projected PM peak hour LOS for city intersections by 2025, with existing
transportation infrastructure in place. Projected 2025 LOS at the analysis intersections is also
shown in Figure 3-12. The following locations are projected to operate below the City’s adopted
LOS standards under the 2025 conditions, if no additional improvements are made to the
transportation system:
174th Street SW and Olympic View Drive
Olympic View Drive and 76th Avenue W
Puget Drive and 88th Avenue W
Caspers Street and 9th Avenue N
212th Street SW and SR 99
212th Street SW and 76th Avenue W
212th Street SW and 84th Avenue W
Main Street and 9th Avenue N
Walnut Street and 9th Avenue S
220th Street SW and SR 99
220th Street SW and 76th Avenue W
Analysis indicates that the intersections of 238th Street SW / Edmonds Way and 244th Street SW
/ 76th Avenue W will operate at LOS F by 2025. As they are located along a Highway of
Statewide Significance, these intersections are not subject to City concurrency standards.
However, the City still considers exceeding LOS E to be operational deficiencies, and will work
with WSDOT to address them.
Packet Page 766 of 930
Comprehensive Transportation Plan – Public Review Draft
City of Edmonds 3-36
Table 3-12. 2025 Intersection Level of Service – without Improvements
Intersection
Traffic
Control
2025
LOS
Avg Delay
(sec/veh)
LOS
Standard
Juris-
diction
1 174th Street SW and Olympic View Drive Westbound
Stop-Control
F1 75 D Edmonds
2 Olympic View Drive and 76th Avenue W All-Way
Stop-Control
F1 180 D Edmonds
3 196th Street SW and 76th Avenue W Signal D 47 D Edmonds
4 Puget Drive and 88th Avenue W Northbound/
Southbound
Stop-Control
F/F1,2 ECL3 D Edmonds
5 Puget Drive and Olympic View Drive Signal B 20 D Edmonds
6 Caspers Street and 9th Avenue N Northbound
Stop-Control
F2 74 D Edmonds
7 208th Street SW and 76th Avenue W Signal B 19 D Edmonds
8 212th Street SW and SR 99 Signal F2 129 E Edmonds
9 212th Street SW and 76th Avenue W Signal F2 136 D Edmonds
10 212th Street SW and 84th Avenue W All-Way
Stop-Control
F2 204 D Edmonds
11 Main Street and 9th Avenue N All-Way
Stop-Control
F2 132 D Edmonds
12 Walnut Street and 9th Avenue S All-Way
Stop-Control
F2 131 D Edmonds
13 Main Street and 3rd Avenue N Signal A 9 D Edmonds
14 220th Street SW and SR 99 Signal F2 120 E Edmonds
15 220th Street SW and 76th Avenue W Signal E 68 D Edmonds
16 220th Street SW and 84th Avenue W Signal B 11 D Edmonds
17 220th Street SW and 9th Avenue S Signal B 14 D Edmonds
18 Edmonds Way and 100th Avenue W Signal D 44 (4)
Edmonds/
WSDOT
19 238th Street SW and SR 99 Signal C 33 E Edmonds
20 238th Street SW and Edmonds Way Eastbound/
Westbound
Stop-Control
F/F1 ECL3/142 (4) Edmonds/
WSDOT
21 244th Street SW and 76th Avenue W Signal F 90 (4) Edmonds/
WSDOT
22 244th Street SW and SR 99 Signal E 55 (4) Shoreline/
Edmonds/
WSDOT
23 238th Street SW and 100th Avenue W Signal B 18 D Edmonds
24 238th Street SW and Firdale Avenue Signal C 27 D Edmonds
1. For two-way stop controlled intersections, the LOS and average delay is presented for each stop-controlled movement.
2. LOS exceeds standard.
3. ECL = Exceeds calculable limits
4. State routes designated as Highways of Statewide Significance are not subject to concurrency and thus no City standard is defined for these
facilities. However, to monitor operations on Highways of Statewide Significance (SR 104, and SR 99 south of SR 104), the City identifies existing or
potential future deficiencies if LOS E is exceeded.
Packet Page 767 of 930
Main St
76
t
h
A
v
e
W
75
t
h
P
l
W
Oly
m
p
i
c
V
i
e
w
D
r
208th St SW
9 5t
h
P
l
W
212th St SW
220th St SW
Fisher
68
t
h
Av
e
W
F
i
r
d
a
l
e
A
v
e
Dayton St
7t
h
A
v
e
N
10
0
t
h
A ve
W
76
t
h
A
v
e
W
Oly
m
p
i
c
V
i
e
w
D
r
238th St SW
80
t
h
A
v
e
W
96
t
h
A
v
e
W
176th St SW
Bowd
oin
W
a
y
180th St SW
Walnut St
3r
d
A
v
e
S
244th St SW
5 th
A
v
e
S
236th St SW
3rd
Av
e
N
84
t
h
Av
e
W
9t
h
A
v
e
S
238th St SW
200th St SWCaspers St
76
t
h
A
v
e
W
Pug et Dr
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
W
y
Ma
p
l
e
w
o
od
D
r
22 8th St SW
9t
h
A
v
e
N
52
n d A
v
e
W
Meado
w
d
a
l
e
B
e
a
c
h
R
o
a
d
Oly mpic Vie
w Dr
80
t
h
A
v
e
W
88
t
h
A
v
e
W
196th St SW
S u ns
e
t
A
v
e
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(!(
!(
(F
(D(F(B
(F
(A (F
(F (F (F
(B
(F
(F(E(B(B
(D
(C (C(F
(E (F
(F
¾?@104
¾?@99
!"`
¾?@524
Snohomish County
King County
City of Edmonds Comprehensive Transportation Plan
June 2009
Figure 3-12. 2025 Level of Service Without Improvement
00.51
Miles
Source: City of Edmonds (2008); WSDOT (2008);
Snohomish County (2008)
City Boundary
Railroad
Water Feature
(A Level of Service (LOS) Designation
!(Meets LOS Standard
!(Exceeds LOS Standard
!(State Highway - Not Subject to Local LOS Standard
Packet Page 768 of 930
Comprehensive Transportation Plan – Public Review Draft
City of Edmonds 3-38
Safety Assessment
Citywide efforts to provide safe transportation include enforcement of traffic regulations,
provision of crosswalks and sidewalks for pedestrians, and provision of well-designed streets for
safe driving. Safety also involves ongoing coordination with emergency service providers to
ensure access for their emergency equipment. Recommendations to address safety issues are
based on assessment of historical collision data, focused sub-area or corridor safety studies, or on
citizen feedback. These assessments are described in the following sections.
Collision History
For this Transportation Plan update, historical collision data provided by WSDOT for the years
2005 through 2007 was compiled and evaluated (WSDOT 2008).
All locations at which an average of five or greater collisions occurred per year were evaluated
more closely. Table 3-13 presents the three most recent years of collision data for locations at
which collision incidents averaged more than five per year (WSDOT 2008). The table shows that
the five highest collision intersections are all located along SR 99, with the highest number
occurring near the intersection of 220th Street SW and SR 99.
An intersection that carries higher traffic volumes is more likely to experience a higher level of
collisions. To account for this, and to allow collision data to be more accurately compared, the
rate of collisions per million entering vehicles was calculated for all locations that had averaged
five or greater collisions per year. Typically, a collision rate at or greater than 1.0 collision per
million entering vehicles raises indicates that further evaluation may be warranted. Table 3-13
presents the collision rate per million entering vehicles at high collision locations; and they are
shown in Figure 3-13. The locations with the rates at or above 1.0 collision per million entering
vehicles are as follows (from the highest rate to the lowest rate):
220th Street SW and SR 99
Main Street and 3rd Avenue
244th Street SW and SR 99
238th Street SW and 84th Avenue W
76th Avenue W and SR 99
212th Street SW and SR 99
SR 104 and 100th Avenue W
220th Street SW and 84th Avenue W
216th Street SW and SR 99
212th Street SW and 76th Avenue W
Packet Page 769 of 930
Street System
June 4, 2009 3-39
The intersection of 220th Street SW and 84th Avenue W was recently reconstructed with traffic
signal. The collision rate is expected to be reduced at the intersection since the improvement. At
the other locations, safety improvement projects may be considered. In addition, at high collision
locations that are also concurrency locations, capacity improvement projects designed to address
operational deficiencies should also serve to improve safety conditions.
Table 3-13. High Collision Locations
Intersection
Total Collisions in
3-Year Analysis
Period1
Average Number
of Collisions per
Year2
Average Collisions
per Million Entering
Vehicles3
220th Street SW and SR 99 90 30 1.8
244th Street SW and SR 99 70 23 1.6
212th Street SW and SR 99 55 18 1.3
SR 99 and 76th Avenue W 54 18 1.5
216th Street SW and SR 99 40 13 1.1(4)
Edmonds Way and 100th Avenue W 39 13 1.2
224th Street SW and SR 99 32 11 0.9(4)
212th Street SW and 76th Avenue W 26 9 1.0
238th Street SW and SR 99 26 9 0.7
244th Street SW and Edmonds Way 20 7 (5)
Main Street and 3rd Avenue 20 7 1.7
236th St SW and Edmonds Way 18 6 0.7(6)
Edmonds Way and SR 99 Ramps 18 6 (5)
220th Street SW and 84th Avenue W 17 6 1.2
244th Street SW and 76th Avenue W 17 6 0.4
238th Street SW and 84th Avenue W 16 5 1.6(7)
220th Street SW and 76th Avenue W 15 5 0.7
236th Street SW and SR 99 14 5 0.4(4)
240th Street SW and SR 99 14 5 0.4(4)
Dayton Street and Sunset Avenue 14 5 0.9
1. Based on data collected from January 2005 through December 2007.
2. Totals that are equal or greater than average 5 collisions per year are included in the table.
3. Totals that exceed threshold of 1.0 collision per million entering vehicles are indicated in bold.
4. Data not available. Intersection entering volume is assumed the same as the intersection of 238th Street SW and SR 99.
5. Data not available.
6. Data not available. Intersection entering volume is assumed the same as the intersection of 238th Street SW and Edmonds Way.
7. Data not available. Use traffic volume along 238th Street SW and 84th Avenue W.
Source: WSDOT 2008.
Packet Page 770 of 930
Main St
76
t
h
A
v
e
W
75
t
h
P
l
W
Oly
m
p
i
c
V
i
e
w
D
r
208th St SW
9 5t
h
P
l
W
212th St SW
220th St SW
Fisher
68
t
h
Av
e
W
F
i
r
d
a
l
e
A
v
e
Dayton St
7t
h
A
v
e
N
10
0
t
h
A ve
W
76
t
h
A
v
e
W
Oly
m
p
i
c
V
i
e
w
D
r
238th St SW
80
t
h
A
v
e
W
96
t
h
A
v
e
W
176th St SW
Bowd
oin
W
a
y
180th St SW
Walnut St
3r
d
A
v
e
S
244th St SW
5 th
A
v
e
S
236th St SW
3rd
Av
e
N
84
t
h
Av
e
W
9t
h
A
v
e
S
238th St SW
200th St SWCaspers St
76
t
h
A
v
e
W
Pug et Dr
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
W
y
Ma
p
l
e
w
o
od
D
r
22 8th St SW
9t
h
A
v
e
N
52
n d A
v
e
W
Meado
w
d
a
l
e
B
e
a
c
h
R
o
a
d
Oly mpic Vie
w Dr
80
t
h
A
v
e
W
88
t
h
A
v
e
W
196th St SW
S u ns
e
t
A
v
e
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
¾?@104
¾?@99
!"`
¾?@524
Snohomish County
King County
City of Edmonds Comprehensive Transportation Plan
June 2009
Figure 3-13. High Collision Locations
00.51
Miles
Source: City of Edmonds (2008); WSDOT (2008);
Snohomish County (2008)
City Boundary
Railroad
Water Feature
Collisions per Million Entering Vehicles
!(1.00 - 1.49
!(1.5 or Higher
Packet Page 771 of 930
Street System
June 4, 2009 3-41
SR 99 Traffic and Circulation Study
The City conducted a focused assessment of the SR 99 corridor in 2006 (Perteet 2006).
Collaborating with community, business, and agency stakeholders, the study sought to evaluate
current and future transportation needs along the corridor, identify multi-modal solutions, and
identify high priority projects for incorporation into the City’s TIP. Two high priority
improvement projects were identified, that are incorporated into this Plan:
SR 99 at 228th Street SW and 76th Avenue W – Construct connection of 228th Street SW
between SR 99 and 76th Avenue W (three lanes with curb, gutter, bike lanes and sidewalk).
Install traffic signals at 228th Street SW/SR 99 and 228th Street SW/76th Avenue W. Install
median on SR 99 to prohibit left turn movements at 76th Avenue W.
SR 99 at 216th Street SW – Widen to allow one left turn lane and one through lane in
eastbound and westbound directions, with 100-foot storage length for turn lanes.
Residential Neighborhood Issues
Residents periodically express concerns about speeding or a high level of cut-through traffic on
residential streets.
Cut-Through Traffic – Over time, drivers will tend to find the most efficient route between
their origin and destination. When congestion occurs on arterials and collector routes
motorists begin to use local access streets as cut-thorough routes. Maintaining the efficiency
of arterial and collector routes is the most effective way to avoid or reduce cut-through
traffic. However, even with optimally designed and managed road networks, there are times
when drivers will use residential streets as shortcuts.
Speeding Traffic – Vehicles traveling well above the speed limit on residential streets reduces
safety and is of concern to residents. Although some motorists will typically drive above the
posted speed limit, the deviation above the limit is typically 5 to 10 miles per hour (mph).
This deviation is anticipated and routinely reflected in the safety design of streets and posted
speed limits. Speeding more than 10 mph over the speed limit sometimes occurs on older
residential streets that have wide travel lanes and an abundance of vehicle parking, which can
encourage speeding because the motorist perceives the street is safe and intended for higher
speeds.
When the cut-through traffic becomes a significant portion of the overall volume on a residential
street, traffic calming measures may be effective in directing traffic to another route. The speed of
motorists along residential streets can also be addressed by traffic calming. Traffic calming
devices are physical devices installed on neighborhood residential streets, to reduce cut-through
traffic, and/or discourage speeding. Traffic calming devices are currently in place at many
locations throughout Edmonds (see Figure 3-5). These measures have been installed as part of
capital improvement projects, as opportunities were presented, and occasionally in response to
citizen requests. However, the City does not currently have a formal traffic calming program.
Packet Page 772 of 930
Comprehensive Transportation Plan – Public Review Draft
City of Edmonds 3-42
Recommended Road Projects and Programs
Capital Improvement Projects
Proposed improvements are presented in Table 3-14, and illustrated in Figure 3-14. Projects are
categorized as concurrency projects, state highway projects, or safety projects.
Concurrency Projects
Capital roadway improvement projects were developed to address intersection deficiencies under
existing conditions and under 2015 and 2025 projected conditions. These projects are needed to
improve operation and capacity at intersections that currently operate or are projected to operate
at levels below the City’s LOS standards. Concurrency projects applied to the 2015 conditions are
those needed to address existing and 2015 deficiencies. Under the 2025 conditions, all
recommended concurrency projects are applied to intersections that are expected to exceed the
LOS standards.
State Highway Projects
Intersections located on SR 104 are not subject to City’s LOS standards; however, capital
roadway improvement projects were developed to address intersections operations at the
following locations:
238th Street SW / Edmonds Way
244th Street SW / 76th Avenue W
The City will work with WSDOT for implementation of these improvements, or alternative
projects to meet the same mobility objectives.
Safety Projects
Capital roadway improvement projects were also developed to address vehicular and pedestrian
safety on city streets. The City has conducted the circulation and safety analysis for SR 99.
According to the study, improvement projects were recommended at the following locations,
which are expected to improve the vehicular and pedestrian safety at these locations.
SR 99 / 228th Street SW / 76th Avenue W
SR 99 / 216th Street SW
Improvements are also recommended on the following streets to improve the vehicle and
pedestrian safety.
238th Street SW, between Edmonds Way and 84th Avenue W
84th Avenue W, between 212th Street S and 238th Street SW
SR 99 illumination
Packet Page 773 of 930
Street System
June 4, 2009 3-43
Shell Valley
Main Street and 3rd Avenue
Table 3-14. Recommended Capital Roadway Improvements through 2025
Location
Trigger
Year1 Improvement Jurisdiction
Concurrency Projects by 2015
4 Puget Drive and 88th Avenue W 2009 Install traffic signal. Edmonds
10 212th Street SW and 84th Avenue W 2009 Install a single-lane roundabout. Edmonds
11 Main Street and 9th Avenue N 2009 Install traffic signal. Edmonds
12 Walnut Street and 9th Avenue S 2009 Install traffic signal. Edmonds
2 Olympic View Drive and 76th Avenue W 2015 Install traffic signal. Widen 76th to add a
westbound left turn lane for 175-foot storage
length.
Edmonds
6 Caspers Street and 9th Avenue N 2015 Install traffic signal. Edmonds
9 212th Street SW and 76th Avenue W 2015 Widen 76th to add a northbound left turn lane for
250-foot storage length and a southbound left
turn lane for 125-foot storage length. Provide
protected left turn phase for northbound and
southbound movements. Widen 212th to add a
westbound right turn lane for 50-foot storage
length.
Edmonds
15 220th Street SW and 76th Avenue W 2015 Reconfigure eastbound lanes to a left turn lane
and a through-right lane. Change eastbound and
westbound phase to provide protected-permitted
phase for eastbound left turn. Provide right turn
phase for westbound movement during
southbound left turn phase.
Edmonds
Concurrency Projects by 2025
1 174th Street SW and Olympic View Drive 2025 Widen Olympic View Dr to add a northbound left
turn lane for 50-foot storage length. Shift the
northbound lanes to the east to provide an
acceleration lane for eastbound left turns.
Edmonds
8 212th Street SW and SR 99 2025 Widen 212th to add a westbound left turn lane
for 200-foot storage length and an eastbound left
turn lane for 300-foot storage length. Provide
protected left turn phase for eastbound and
westbound movements.
Edmonds
14 220th Street SW and SR 99 2025 Widen 220th to add westbound right turn lane for
325-foot storage length. Widen SR 99 add
second southbound left turn lane for 275-foot
storage length.
Edmonds
State Highway Improvement Projects
20 238th Street SW and Edmonds Way 2008 Install a signal and provide protected left turn
phase for northbound and southbound.
Edmonds/
WSDOT
Packet Page 774 of 930
Comprehensive Transportation Plan – Public Review Draft
City of Edmonds 3-44
Location
Trigger
Year1 Improvement Jurisdiction
21 244th Street SW and 76th Avenue W 2025 Widen 244th to add second westbound left turn
lane for 325-foot storage length. Provide right
turn phase for northbound movement during
westbound left turn phase.
Edmonds/
WSDOT
Safety Projects
SR 99 at 228th Street SW and 76th
Avenue W
Construct connection of 228th Street SW
between SR 99 and 76th Avenue W (three lanes
with curb, gutter, bike lanes and sidewalk).
Install traffic signals at 228th Street SW / SR 99
and 228th Street SW and 76th Avenue W.
Install median on SR 99 to prohibit left turn
movements at 76th Avenue W.
Edmonds
SR 99 at 216th Street SW Widen to allow one left turn lane and one
through lane in eastbound and westbound
directions, with 100-foot storage length for turn
lanes.
Edmonds
238th Street SW, between Edmonds Way
and 84th Avenue W
Widen to three lanes with curb, gutter, and
sidewalk.
Edmonds
84th Avenue W, between 212th Street S
and 238th Street SW
Widen to three lanes with curb, gutter, and
sidewalk.
Edmonds/
Snohomish
County
SR 99 illumination Improve roadway safety with illumination. Edmonds
Shell Valley New road to improve emergency vehicle access
and non-motorized access.
Edmonds
Main Street and 3rd Avenue Upgrade signal to reduce conflicts with trucks. Edmonds
1. Trigger year is the year by which travel demand forecasts indicates that the location will operate below adopted LOS standards, and
thus be in violation of concurrency. Under the GMA, improvements must be in place within six years of the year that a concurrency
violation is triggered.
2015 Operating Conditions with Improvements
Projected intersection LOS under 2015 conditions, with recommended improvements in place, is
summarized in Table 3-14 and illustrated in Figure 3-15. The table shows that recommended
projects are expected to address deficiencies identified through 2015.
2025 Operating Conditions with Improvements
Projected intersection LOS under 2025 conditions, with recommended improvements in place, is
summarized in Table 3-16 and illustrated in Figure 3-16. The table shows that recommended
projects are expected to address deficiencies identified through 2025.
Packet Page 775 of 930
Main St
76
t
h
A
v
e
W
75
t
h
P
l
W
Oly
m
p
i
c
V
i
e
w
D
r
208th St SW
9 5t
h
P
l
W
212th St SW
220th St SW
Fisher
68
t
h
Av
e
W
F
i
r
d
a
l
e
A
v
e
Dayton St
7t
h
A
v
e
N
10
0
t
h
A ve
W
76
t
h
A
v
e
W
Oly
m
p
i
c
V
i
e
w
D
r
238th St SW
80
t
h
A
v
e
W
96
t
h
A
v
e
W
176th St SW
Bowd
oin
W
a
y
180th St SW
Walnut St
3r
d
A
v
e
S
244th St SW
5 th
A
v
e
S
236th St SW
3rd
Av
e
N
84
t
h
Av
e
W
9t
h
A
v
e
S
238th St SW
200th St SWCaspers St
76
t
h
A
v
e
W
Pug et Dr
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
W
y
Ma
p
l
e
w
o
od
D
r
22 8th St SW
9t
h
A
v
e
N
52
n d A
v
e
W
Meado
w
d
a
l
e
B
e
a
c
h
R
o
a
d
Oly mpic Vie
w Dr
80
t
h
A
v
e
W
88
t
h
A
v
e
W
196th St SW
S u ns
e
t
A
v
e
104
99
524
Snohomish County
King County
City of Edmonds Comprehensive Transportation Plan
June 2009
Figure 3-14. Recommended Capital Road Improvements
00.51
Miles
Source: City of Edmonds (2008); WSDOT (2008);
Snohomish County (2008)
City Boundary
Railroad
Water Feature
Improvement Types
Install New Signal
Upgrade Existing Signal
Install Roundabout
Add Lane/Intersection Approach
Widen Road
Project Category
Concurrency
Safety
Highway of Statewide Significance
Packet Page 776 of 930
Comprehensive Transportation Plan – Public Review Draft
City of Edmonds 3-46
Table 3-15. 2015 Level of Service – with Recommended Improvements
Intersection
Traffic
Control
2015
LOS
Average
Delay
(sec/veh)
LOS
Standard
Juris-
diction
1 174th Street SW and Olympic View Drive Westbound
Stop-Control
D 33 D Edmonds
2 Olympic View Drive and 76th Avenue W Signal B 12 D Edmonds
3 196th Street SW and 76th Avenue W Signal D 42 D Edmonds
4 Puget Drive and 88th Avenue W Signal A 7 D Edmonds
5 Puget Drive and Olympic View Drive Signal B 16 D Edmonds
6 Caspers Street and 9th Avenue N Signal A 9 D Edmonds
7 208th Street SW and 76th Avenue W Signal B 15 D Edmonds
8 212th Street SW and SR 99 Signal E 77 E Edmonds
9 212th Street SW and 76th Avenue W Signal D 38 D Edmonds
10 212th Street SW and 84th Avenue W Single-lane
Roundabout
B 12 D Edmonds
11 Main Street and 9th Avenue N Signal B 13 D Edmonds
12 Walnut Street and 9th Avenue S Signal A 8 D Edmonds
13 Main Street and 3rd Avenue N Signal A 8 D Edmonds
14 220th Street SW and SR 99 Signal E 72 E Edmonds
15 220th Street SW and 76th Avenue W Signal C 35 D Edmonds
16 220th Street SW and 84th Avenue W Signal A 9 D Edmonds
17 220th Street SW and 9th Avenue S Signal B 13 D Edmonds
18 Edmonds Way and 100th Avenue W Signal D 36 (1) Edmonds/
WSDOT
19 238th Street SW and SR 99 Signal C 24 E Edmonds
20 238th Street SW and Edmonds Way Signal B 10 (1) Edmonds/
WSDOT
21 244th Street SW and 76th Avenue W Signal D 43 (1) Edmonds/
WSDOT
22 244th Street SW and SR 99 Signal D 50 (1)
(SR 99 HSS)
Shoreline/
Edmonds/
WSDOT
23 238th Street SW and 100th Avenue W Signal B 15 D Edmonds
24 238th Street SW and Firdale Avenue Signal C 21 D Edmonds
1. State routes designated as Highways of Statewide Significance are not subject to concurrency and thus no City standard is defined for these
facilities. However, to monitor operations on Highways of Statewide Significance (SR 104, and SR 99 south of SR 104), the City identifies existing or
potential future deficiencies if LOS E is exceeded.
Packet Page 777 of 930
Main St
76
t
h
A
v
e
W
75
t
h
P
l
W
Oly
m
p
i
c
V
i
e
w
D
r
208th St SW
9 5t
h
P
l
W
212th St SW
220th St SW
Fisher
68
t
h
Av
e
W
F
i
r
d
a
l
e
A
v
e
Dayton St
7t
h
A
v
e
N
10
0
t
h
A ve
W
76
t
h
A
v
e
W
Oly
m
p
i
c
V
i
e
w
D
r
238th St SW
80
t
h
A
v
e
W
96
t
h
A
v
e
W
176th St SW
Bowd
oin
W
a
y
180th St SW
Walnut St
3r
d
A
v
e
S
244th St SW
5 th
A
v
e
S
236th St SW
3rd
Av
e
N
84
t
h
Av
e
W
9t
h
A
v
e
S
238th St SW
200th St SWCaspers St
76
t
h
A
v
e
W
Pug et Dr
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
W
y
Ma
p
l
e
w
o
od
D
r
22 8th St SW
9t
h
A
v
e
N
52
n d A
v
e
W
Meado
w
d
a
l
e
B
e
a
c
h
R
o
a
d
Oly mpic Vie
w Dr
80
t
h
A
v
e
W
88
t
h
A
v
e
W
196th St SW
S u ns
e
t
A
v
e
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(!(
!(
(D
(D(A(B
(A
(A (B
(A (B (D
(B
(E
(E(C(A(B
(D
(C (C(B
(D (E
(B
¾?@104
¾?@99
!"`
¾?@524
Snohomish County
King County
City of Edmonds Comprehensive Transportation Plan
June 2009
Figure 3-15. 2015 Level of Service With Improvement
00.51
Miles
Source: City of Edmonds (2008); WSDOT (2008);
Snohomish County (2008)
City Boundary
Railroad
Water Feature
(A Level of Service (LOS) Designation
!(Meets LOS Standard
!(Exceeds LOS Standard
!(State Highway - Not Subject to Local LOS Standard
Packet Page 778 of 930
Comprehensive Transportation Plan – Public Review Draft
City of Edmonds 3-48
Table 3-16. 2025 Level of Service – with Recommended Improvements
Intersection
Mitigated
Traffic
Control
2025
LOS
Average
Delay
(sec/veh)
LOS
Standard
Juris-
diction
1 174th Street SW and Olympic View Drive Westbound
Stop-Control
D 33 D Edmonds
2 Olympic View Drive and 76th Avenue W Signal B 12 D Edmonds
3 196th Street SW and 76th Avenue W Signal D 47 D Edmonds
4 Puget Drive and 88th Avenue W Signal A 8 D Edmonds
5 Puget Drive and Olympic View Drive Signal B 20 D Edmonds
6 Caspers Street and 9th Avenue N Signal B 13 D Edmonds
7 208th Street SW and 76th Avenue W Signal B 19 D Edmonds
8 212th Street SW and SR 99 Signal E 80 E Edmonds
9 212th Street SW and 76th Avenue W Signal D 54 D Edmonds
10 212th Street SW and 84th Avenue W Single-lane
Roundabout
B 12 D Edmonds
11 Main Street and 9th Avenue N Signal B 16 D Edmonds
12 Walnut Street and 9th Avenue S Signal A 9 D Edmonds
13 Main Street and 3rd Avenue N Signal A 9 D Edmonds
14 220th Street SW and SR 99 Signal E 62 E Edmonds
15 220th Street SW and 76th Avenue W Signal D 52 D Edmonds
16 220th Street SW and 84th Avenue W Signal B 11 D Edmonds
17 220th Street SW and 9th Avenue S Signal B 14 D Edmonds
18 Edmonds Way and 100th Avenue W Signal D 44 (1) Edmonds/
WSDOT
19 238th Street SW and SR 99 Signal C 33 E Edmonds
20 238th Street SW and Edmonds Way Signal B 11 (1) Edmonds/
WSDOT
21 244th Street SW and 76th Avenue W Signal D 52 (1) Edmonds/
WSDOT
22 244th Street SW and SR 99 Signal E 55 (1) Shoreline/
Edmonds/
WSDOT
23 238th Street SW and 100th Avenue W Signal B 18 D Edmonds
24 238th Street SW and Firdale Avenue Signal C 27 D Edmonds
1. State routes designated as Highways of Statewide Significance are not subject to concurrency and thus no City standard is defined for these
facilities. However, to monitor operations on Highways of Statewide Significance (SR 104, and SR 99 south of SR 104), the City identifies existing or
potential future deficiencies if LOS E is exceeded.
Packet Page 779 of 930
Main St
76
t
h
A
v
e
W
75
t
h
P
l
W
Oly
m
p
i
c
V
i
e
w
D
r
208th St SW
9 5t
h
P
l
W
212th St SW
220th St SW
Fisher
68
t
h
Av
e
W
F
i
r
d
a
l
e
A
v
e
Dayton St
7t
h
A
v
e
N
10
0
t
h
A ve
W
76
t
h
A
v
e
W
Oly
m
p
i
c
V
i
e
w
D
r
238th St SW
80
t
h
A
v
e
W
96
t
h
A
v
e
W
176th St SW
Bowd
oin
W
a
y
180th St SW
Walnut St
3r
d
A
v
e
S
244th St SW
5 th
A
v
e
S
236th St SW
3rd
Av
e
N
84
t
h
Av
e
W
9t
h
A
v
e
S
238th St SW
200th St SWCaspers St
76
t
h
A
v
e
W
Pug et Dr
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
W
y
Ma
p
l
e
w
o
od
D
r
22 8th St SW
9t
h
A
v
e
N
52
n d A
v
e
W
Meado
w
d
a
l
e
B
e
a
c
h
R
o
a
d
Oly mpic Vie
w Dr
80
t
h
A
v
e
W
88
t
h
A
v
e
W
196th St SW
S u ns
e
t
A
v
e
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(!(
!(
(D
(D(B(B
(B
(A (B
(A (B (D
(B
(E
(E(D(B(B
(D
(C (C(B
(E (D
(B
¾?@104
¾?@99
!"`
¾?@524
Snohomish County
King County
City of Edmonds Comprehensive Transportation Plan
June 2009
Figure 3-16. 2025 Level of Service With Improvement
00.51
Miles
Source: City of Edmonds (2008); WSDOT (2008);
Snohomish County (2008)
City Boundary
Railroad
Water Feature
(A Level of Service (LOS) Designation
!(Meets LOS Standard
!(Exceeds LOS Standard
!(State Highway - Not Subject to Local LOS Standard
Packet Page 780 of 930
Comprehensive Transportation Plan – Public Review Draft
City of Edmonds 3-50
Road Project Priority
The road improvement projects presented in this Transportation Plan were identified to address a
variety of mobility and safety issues. The projects were prioritized according to five criteria
presented in Table 3-17.
Table 3-17. Prioritization Criteria for Roadway Projects
Criteria Weight Description Points
Concurrency 3 Is the project required to meet
concurrency?
3 Existing concurrency deficiency
2 Concurrency deficiency identified by 2015
1 Concurrency deficiency identified by 2025
0 Does not address a concurrency deficiency
Safety 3 Does the project address identified
safety issues?
3 High collision location 1.5 collisions per million
entering vehicles
2 High collision location 1.0 - 1.5 collisions per
million entering vehicles
1 <1.0 collisions per million entering vehicles
0 No historical vehicle safety issues identified
Grant
Eligibility
2 Does the project include elements, such
as strong safety and/or non-motorized
components, which would make it more
attractive for state or federal grant
funding?
3 High eligibility
2 Medium eligibility
1 Low eligibility
0 No eligibility
Magnitude of
Improvement
2 At how many locations will the project
improve travel conditions?
3 Improve LOS at 2 or more intersections
2 Improve LOS in all directions at an intersection;
and/or significantly improve pedestrian safety
1 Improve LOS in 1 or 2 directions at an
intersection
Multimodal
Elements
1 Does the project include elements that
improve safety or mobility for
pedestrians, bicyclists, and/or transit?
3 Improves transit and non-motorized travel
2 Improves non-motorized travel
1 Improves transit mobility
0 Does not include multimodal elements
Table 3-18 lists the roadway projects in ranked order, based upon the criteria described in Table
3-17.
Packet Page 781 of 930
Street System
June 4, 2009 3-51
Table 3-18. Roadway Project Priority
Criteria Concurrency Safety
Grant
Eligibility Magnitude
Multimodal
Elements
Weight 3 3 2 2 1 Weighted
TotalRank Project Raw Wtd Raw Wtd Raw Wtd Raw Wtd Raw Wtd
1 228th Street SW, SR99 -
76th Avenue W
0 0 3 9 3 6 3 6 3 3 24
2 Main Street / 9th Avenue
N
3 9 1 3 2 4 2 4 3 3 23
3 212th Street SW / 76th
Avenue W
2 6 2 6 2 4 2 4 1 1 21
4 Main St / 3rd Ave signal
upgrade
0 0 3 9 3 6 2 4 2 2 21
5 84th Avenue W, 212th
Street SW - 238th Street
SW
0 0 3 9 2 4 2 4 3 3 20
6 212th Street SW / 84th
Avenue W
3 9 1 3 1 2 2 4 1 1 19
7 Walnut Street / 9th
Avenue S
3 9 1 3 1 2 1 2 3 3 19
8 Puget Drive / 196th St
SW / 88th Avenue W
3 9 1 3 1 2 1 2 2 2 18
9 Olympic View Drive / 76th
Avenue W
2 6 1 3 1 2 2 4 2 2 17
10 220th Street SW / SR 99 1 3 3 9 1 2 1 2 1 1 17
11 220th Street SW / 76th
Avenue W
2 6 1 3 1 2 2 4 1 1 16
12 Caspers Street / 9th
Avenue N
2 6 1 3 1 2 1 2 3 3 16
13 212th Street SW / SR 99 1 3 2 6 2 4 1 2 1 1 16
14 SR 99 Illumination 0 0 3 9 1 2 1 2 3 3 16
15 238th Street SW /
Edmonds Way (SR 104)
0 0 1 3 1 2 2 4 3 3 12
16 216th Street / SR 99 0 0 2 6 1 2 1 2 2 2 12
17 174th Street SW /
Olympic View Drive
1 3 1 3 1 2 1 2 0 0 10
18 238th Street SW, SR104 -
84th Avenue W
0 0 1 3 1 2 1 2 3 3 10
19 Shell Valley 0 0 1 3 1 2 1 2 2 2 9
20 244th Street SW (SR
104) / 76th Avenue W
0 0 1 3 1 2 1 2 1 1 8
Packet Page 782 of 930
Comprehensive Transportation Plan – Public Review Draft
City of Edmonds 3-52
Traffic Calming Program
The recommended Edmonds Neighborhood Traffic Calming program is described in detail in
Appendix B of this Transportation Plan. The program is designed to assist residents and the City
staff in responding to neighborhood traffic issues related to speeding, cut-through traffic, and
safety. Implementation of a traffic calming program allows traffic concerns to be addressed
consistently and traffic calming measures to be efficiently developed and put into operation.
In establishing a neighborhood traffic calming program, the City must take into account the
restriction that no deviation from WSDOT design standards is permitted on principal arterials,
minor arterials and collector streets without express approval of the WSDOT local programs
engineer (RCW 35.78). This limitation does not apply to local access streets, which are defined
by RCW 35.78.010 as streets “…generally limited to providing access to abutting property…
tributary to major and secondary thoroughfares… generally discouraging through traffic…”
Therefore, only local access streets are generally eligible for traffic calming programs.
The two main purposes of traffic calming techniques are to:
Reduce the use of residential streets for cut-through traffic, and
Reduce overall speeds along residential roadways.
A key component of any successful traffic calming program is citizen initiation and ongoing
resident involvement. The traffic calming process begins when residents gather eight or more
signatures on a petition, requesting that the City initiate a study. The City then undertakes a
comprehensive traffic study, gathering data on vehicle speeds, traffic volumes, collision history,
and nighttime lighting conditions. If the study reveals a need for traffic calming per the criteria
set forth in the Edmonds Traffic Calming program (Appendix B), a three-phase approach to
remediate traffic issues is used. The first phase is the start of the process, with the residents filing
a petition and the City reviewing whether or not the application qualifies. Phase 2 focuses on
solutions that can be quickly deployed, including education, signage, striping modifications, and
more police enforcement. If a follow up study indicates that these solutions are not sufficiently
effective, Phase 3 traffic calming measures are considered. Phase 3 measures, which are generally
more costly and require more time to deploy, might include physical devices such as curb bulbs,
chicanes, and traffic circles. The need for citizen involvement greatly increases in Phase 3,
because each potential solution requires resident approval prior to implementation.
Preservation and Maintenance Programs and Projects
The City’s transportation infrastructure is comprised primarily of streets with pavements,
sidewalks, illumination, and traffic control, including traffic signals, signs, and pavement
marking. Transportation infrastructure requires maintenance, repair, rehabilitation, updating, and
replacement to maintain serviceability, reliability, and safety, and to protect the public’s
investment. Maintenance of existing infrastructure enables efficiency of transportation operations,
and reduces the need for more expensive capital improvements.
Packet Page 783 of 930
Street System
June 4, 2009 3-53
Maintenance of the City’s transportation infrastructure is provided primarily by the City’s Public
Works Department. Activities include the following.
Annual Street Overlays – The projects include spot repairs of failed pavement, full surface
and taper grinding of pavement, curbing and sidewalk repairs, and minor storm water system
modifications. The projects also incorporate traffic calming measures. In coordination with
this transportation plan, future projects will include retrofit of curb ramps for ADA
compliance, and may include delineating bike lanes and other bike route improvements (see
Chapter 4 for a more detailed discussion). Selection of projects includes reviewing the capital
improvement plans for water, sewer, and storm to determine if utility improvements are
programmed within the roadway segment under consideration. If there are, the projects
schedules will be coordinated.
The Principal Arterial, Minor Arterials, and Collectors are all rated once every 2 years as part
of the WSDOT Pavement Condition Survey. Those streets are assigned a Pavement
Condition Index (PCI) ranging from 0-100:
- 71 – 100: Excellent (only routine maintenance necessary: activities are performed to
maintain a safe traffic condition and include pothole patching, patching around utility
structures, and crack sealing).
- 50 – 70: Fair (Repair activities are done within the initial 10 year life of a new pavement
helps to prevent potholes from occurring. These activities may mean placing a new
surface (2 inches or less) on an existing road way to provide a better all weather surfaces,
a better riding surface, and to extend or renew the pavement life).
- 25 – 49: Poor (Rehabilitation work generally consists of the preparatory work activities
and either thin or thick overlay. Preparatory work may involve digging out defective
asphalt, base and sub base. A rehab project typically extends the roadway life between 10
–15 years).
- Less than 25: Fail (Reconstruction is required as a majority of the pavement or
underlying base course has failed and can no longer serve as competent foundation for
flexible pavements like asphalt).
Under existing conditions, 70% of city arterials and collectors are in Excellent to Fair
condition, based upon these guidelines. The remaining 30% are in Poor to Fail condition.
Citywide Street Improvements – The City implements minor maintenance projects to
increase roadway life. Projects may include spot repairs of failed pavement, curbing and
sidewalk repairs, and minor storm water system modifications.
Citywide Signal Improvements – As traffic signals age, their functionality becomes more
limited and they become more difficult to maintain. The City regularly upgrades traffic
signals to maintain functionality, and to incorporate new technology.
Citywide Cabinet and Controller Upgrades – A signal controller is located in a
controller cabinet at each traffic signal, and determines phases and cycle length for the signal
Packet Page 784 of 930
Comprehensive Transportation Plan – Public Review Draft
City of Edmonds 3-54
it operates. Signal controllers are comprised of many types and many manufacturers, and as
they age, their functionality becomes more limited and they become more difficult to
maintain. The City regularly upgrades signal controllers to maintain functionality, and to
accommodate modern traffic control equipment.
The following specific maintenance projects are also currently planned:
-Puget Drive/Olympic View Drive Signal Upgrades – Rebuild signal
-238th Street SW/100th Avenue W Signal Upgrades – Rebuild complete signal system
and install video detection
Packet Page 785 of 930
June 4, 2009 4-1
Chapter 4. Non-Motorized System
This chapter provides an inventory of existing pedestrian and bicycle facilities and an assessment
of existing deficiencies and improvement needs. The chapter also highlights strategies for
compliance with ADA, and provides recommendations for other improvements to address
pedestrian and bicycle mobility and safety.
Comprehensive Walkway Plan
In 2002, the City of Edmonds completed its Comprehensive Walkway Plan. The plan included
goals and objectives for non-motorized transportation in the city, in addition to a walkway
inventory, a review of facility standards, and recommendations for walkway projects. The goals
and objectives include:
Goal: Improve non-motorized transportation facilities and services.
Objective: Sidewalks. Safe and attractive pedestrian facilities should be provided as an
essential element of the City’s circulation and recreation system, as established in the City of
Edmonds Comprehensive Walkway Plan.
Objective: Sidewalk Construction Policy. Clarify when sidewalks should be constructed as a
condition of development.
The following inventory has been updated from the 2002 Walkway Plan, and the existing
facilities have been evaluated for ADA compliance.
Walkway Inventory
Pedestrian facilities within the city include sidewalks, walkways, roadway shoulders, and off-road
trails. Those facilities are typically more concentrated in areas with high pedestrian activity, such
as the downtown area, commercial and business centers, near schools and other public facilities.
Figure 4-1 illustrates the locations within Edmonds that have pedestrian-intensive land uses.
Packet Page 786 of 930
Comprehensive Transportation Plan – Public Review Draft
City of Edmonds 4-2
Figure 4-2 illustrates the existing sidewalks and walkways within the city. The figure shows that
the sidewalk system is most complete inside the core area bounded by SR 104, 92nd Avenue W,
and SR 524. Outside of this area, sidewalks are primarily located along roads classified as
collectors or arterials. Raised and striped walkways are generally associated with schools and
provide safe walking routes.
The federal ADA was passed in 1990 and amended in 2008. ADA requires jurisdictions to
provide accessible sidewalks primarily through the installation of ADA-compliant sidewalk
ramps. The design requirements address various areas of concern such as curb alignment with
crosswalks, narrower sidewalk width, obstacles such as utility poles, placement of the sidewalk
adjacent to the curb, or the slope of the ramps. Most of the city’s sidewalk ramps were
constructed in the 1980s or later. As pedestrian improvements are made along roadway corridors,
the City has upgraded sidewalk ramps or installed new ones in accordance with current standards.
Packet Page 787 of 930
City of Edmonds Comprehensive Transportation Plan
June 2009
Figure 4-1. Pedestrian Intensive Land Uses
00.51
Miles
Source: City of Edmonds (2008); WSDOT (2008);
Snohomish County (2008)
School
Downtown
Park
Business
Government/
Community
Hospital
Main St
76
t
h
A
v
e
W
75
t
h
P
l
W
Oly
m
p
i
c
V
i
e
w
D
r
208th St SW
95
t
h
P
l
W
212th St SW
220th St SW
Fisher
68
t
h
A
v
e
W
F
i
r
d
a
l
e
A
v
e
Dayton St
7t
h
A
e
N
10
0
t
h
A
v
e
W
7 6t
h
A
v
e
W
Oly
m
p
i
c
V
iew
D
r
238th St SW
176th St SW
Bow
d
o
i
n
W
ay
180th St
S
W
Walnut St
3r
d
A
v eS
244th St SW
5 th
A
v
e
S
236th St SW
3rd
A
v
e
N
84
t
h
A
v
e
W
9t
h
A
v
e
S
238th St SW
200th St SWCaspers St
76
t
h
A
v
e
W
Puget Dr
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
W
y
Ma
p
l
e
w
o
o
d
D
r
228th St SW
9t
h
A
v
e
N
52
n
d
A
v
e
W
Meado
w
d
a
l
e
B
e
a
c
h
R
o
a
d
Olympic
V
i
e
w
D
r
80
t
h
A
v
e
W
88
t
h
A
v
e
W
196th St SW
Su
n
s
et
A
v
e
104
99
524
Snohomish County
King County
Packet Page 788 of 930
Main St
76
t
h
A
v
e
W
75
t
h
P
l
W
Oly
m
p
i
c
V
i
e
w
D
r
208th St SW
9 5t
h
P
l
W
212th St SW
220th St SW
Fisher
68
t
h
Av
e
W
F
i
r
d
a
l
e
A
v
e
Dayton St
7t
h
A
v
e
N
10
0
t
h
A ve
W
76
t
h
A
v
e
W
Oly
m
p
i
c
V
i
e
w
D
r
238th St SW
80
t
h
A
v
e
W
96
t
h
A
v
e
W
176th St SW
Bowd
oin
W
a
y
180th St SW
Walnut St
3r
d
A
v
e
S
244th St SW
5 th
A
v
e
S
236th St SW
3rd
Av
e
N
84
t
h
Av
e
W
9t
h
A
v
e
S
238th St SW
200th St SWCaspers St
76
t
h
A
v
e
W
Pug et Dr
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
W
y
Ma
p
l
e
w
o
od
D
r
22 8th St SW
9t
h
A
v
e
N
52
n d A
v
e
W
Meado
w
d
a
l
e
B
e
a
c
h
R
o
a
d
Oly mpic Vie
w Dr
80
t
h
A
v
e
W
88
t
h
A
v
e
W
196th St SW
S u ns
e
t
A
v
e
¾?@104
¾?@99
!"`
¾?@524
Snohomish County
King County
City of Edmonds Comprehensive Transportation Plan
June 2009
Figure 4-2. Existing Walkways
00.51
Miles
Source: City of Edmonds (2008); WSDOT (2008);
Snohomish County (2008)
City Boundary
Railroad
Water Feature
Sidewalk on One Side
Sidewalk on Both Sides
Unpaved Walkway
Packet Page 789 of 930
Non-Motorized System
June 4, 2009 4-5
All city intersections where sidewalks exist were inventoried to document where sidewalk ramps
are present. Sidewalk ramps were assessed to determine if landing areas and detection warning
meet current ADA guidelines. The curb ramp inventory is provided in Appendix D. Of
approximately 350 intersections in Edmonds, 42 intersections were found to fully meet ADA
standards, and 24 intersections partially met ADA standards.
Recommended Walkway Improvements
This section presents recommended walkway improvements, which consist of new sidewalk
connections to improve pedestrian mobility and safety, and upgrades of curb ramps to conform to
ADA standards.
Walkway Prioritization Process
Major gaps in the city walkway system were identified by the Walkway Committee. To address
those gaps, the Committee developed criteria to evaluate and prioritize walkway improvement
projects. These criteria were used to prioritize improvements to walkway sections that were
identified based on input from public meetings, Walkway Committee meetings, and deficiencies
determined from a review of the existing city walkway inventory.
The criteria were weighted according to their importance. A system of points was developed to
evaluate each proposed project against each criterion. The result was a weighted average score
that helps to compare and prioritize proposed projects. Table 4-1 describes the walkway
prioritization criteria and their relative weights and point systems.
Table 4-1. Prioritization Criteria for Walkway Projects
Criteria Weight Description Points
Pedestrian
Safety
5 How safe is the route for pedestrians?
Does this improvement:
Separate pedestrians from vehicular
traffic, especially in high traffic areas?
Improve width of walkway and surface
conditions?
Address potential conflicts at road
crossings?
3 Strong concerns for pedestrian safety along this
route
2 Some concerns for pedestrian safety along this
route
1 This route is very similar to other routes in
Edmonds
0 Not a safety concern
Connectivity
to Services
and Facilities
4 Does this route connect to facilities or
services such as schools, parks,
churches, community centers,
businesses or transit routes?
Does this improvement:
Provide direct access to facilities or
services?
Ensure that the route links to a safe
direct access to facilities or services?
3 Route provides significant access to 3 or more
services and facilities
2 Route provides access to services and facilities
1 Route provides access to 1 service or facility
0 Route does not provide access to services or
facilities
Packet Page 790 of 930
Comprehensive Transportation Plan – Public Review Draft
City of Edmonds 4-6
Criteria Weight Description Points
Continuity to
Other
Walkway
Links
3 Does this route complete gaps in the
city’s walkway system?
Does this improvement:
Complete important pedestrian
routes?
Make important destinations more
accessible to users?
Ultimately develop a web of
walkways?
3 Location is a missing link in a very important
pedestrian route
2 Location is a missing link in a pedestrian route
1 Location is one of several missing links in a
route and important
0 Not a missing link in the city walkway system
Pedestrian
Level of
Activity
3 Is this a well-traveled route, or would it
be, if improved?
Level of activity may be determined by:
Measured counts
Identification by the public and staff,
through observation and experience
3 Route is utilized by a significant number of
pedestrians
2 Route is utilized consistently by pedestrians
1 Route is occasionally used by pedestrians
0 Route is not utilized by pedestrians
Public
Support
2 Does the public support the development
of this route?
3 A support petition has been filed with a large
number of signatures from abutting and nearby
property owners and the general public
2 Route has been the subject of a number of
citizen letters along with testimony at public
meetings in support of walkways
1 Route has been the subject of some negative
concern, expressed at public meetings
0 Route has been the subject of major negative
concern, expressed at public meetings
Compatibility
with Goals
and Policies
1 Is this route consistent with the City of
Edmonds Comprehensive Plan Goals,
Policies, and Objectives?
Is this route compatible with the
surrounding land uses?
3 Route would enhance the nearby properties and
complete a portion of the City’s Walkway Plan
2 Route would enhance the nearby properties
1 Route is in a rural area which serves pedestrians
well
0 Surrounding land uses do not generate
pedestrian traffic
Environment
al Impacts
1 Will the development of the route have
any impacts on the environment?
Environmental impacts include:
Wetlands
Shorelines
Wildlife habitat
Aesthetics
3 Route has no negative environmental impact
and aesthetically improves the area
2 Route has some negative environmental impact
but aesthetically improves the area
1 Route has some negative environmental impact
0 Route will have major negative impact on the
environment
Packet Page 791 of 930
Non-Motorized System
June 4, 2009 4-7
Criteria Weight Description Points
Distance
from Schools
1 Is this route within a mile of a public
school?
3 Route is an Elementary school route or close
proximity to school
2 Route provides access to High school students
1 Route is within 0.5 mile of school
Connectivity
with Transit
Services
1 Is this route also a route for transit or
provide access to transit?
3 This route is on a public transit route with transit
stops
2 This route is within 650 feet from a public transit
route with transit stops
1 This route provides a principal pedestrian
access corridor to public transit where sidewalks
do not exist on adjacent pedestrian routes.
(Beyond 650 feet from a public transit route.)
Availability of
Existing
Infrastructure
1 Is there existing infrastructure along this
route that will significantly reduce project
costs?
3 There is existing curb and gutter
2 There is partial curb and gutter
1 There is no curb and gutter
Walkway sections were analyzed separately depending on the section length. Walkway sections
longer than 1,000 feet are defined as “long walkways” and walkway sections shorter than 1,000
feet are defined as “short walkways”.
Using the weighted and scoring criteria, projects with more than 50 points were designated as
Priority 1, and projects with 50 points or less were designated as Priority 2. Table 4-2 summarizes
the walkways that were considered for walkway improvements by the type of projects (i.e., short
walkway or long walkway). The projects are listed in ranked order by the total points and by
priority level. Figure 4-3 shows the locations of the walkway projects. A more detailed summary
of each project’s limits, existing conditions, and point tally is provided in Appendix D.
Table 4-2. Recommended Walkway Projects
ID Street Name From To
Street
Side¹
Total
Points Priority
Short Walkway Projects
S1 2nd Avenue Main Street James Street East 63 1
S2 Dayton Street 7th Avenue S 8th Avenue S South 63 1
S3 Maple Street West of 6th Avenue S 8th Avenue S South 62 1
S4 Walnut Street 6th Avenue S 7th Avenue S Either 54 1
S5 Walnut Street 3rd Avenue S 4th Avenue S South 53 1
S6 226th Street SW 106th Avenue S SR 104 South 50 1
S7 189th Place SW 80th Avenue W 78th Avenue W Either 45 2
Packet Page 792 of 930
Comprehensive Transportation Plan – Public Review Draft
City of Edmonds 4-8
ID Street Name From To
Street
Side¹
Total
Points Priority
S8 8th Avenue Walnut Avenue South of Walnut Stairway
or trail
43 2
S9 84th Avenue W 188th Street SW 186th Street SW East 43 2
S10 190th Place SW 94th Avenue W Olympic View
Drive
Either 42 2
Long Walkway Projects
L1 236th Street SW/
234th Street SW
SR 104 97th Place W South 65 1
L2 Maplewood Drive Main Street 200th Street SW West 64 1
L3 Olympic Avenue Puget Drive Main Street East 62 1
L4 Meadowdale Beach
Road
Olympic View Drive 76th Avenue W North 60 1
L5 Pine Street 9th Avenue W SR 104 South 59 1
L6 80th Avenue W/
180th Street SW
188th Street SW Olympic View
Drive
West 58 1
L7 80th Avenue W 206th Street SW 212th Street SW Either 58 1
L8 238th Street SW 104th Avenue W 100th Avenue W North 57 1
L9 238th Street SW Highway 99 76th Avenue W North 56 1
L10 232nd Street W 100th Avenue W 97th Avenue W South 54 1
L11 84th Avenue W 238th Street SW 234th Street SW East 54 1
L12 176th Street SW 72nd Avenue W Olympic View
Drive
Either 53 1
L13 188th Street SW 92nd Avenue W 88th Avenue W South 49 2
L14 Andover Street/
184th Street SW
184th Street SW/
88th Avenue W
Olympic View
Drive/
Andover Street
Either/
North2
49 2
L15 72nd Avenue W Olympic View Drive 176th Street SW Either 47 2
L16 236th Street SW SR 104 East of 84th
Avenue W
North 47 2
L17 92nd Avenue W 189th Place SW 186th Place SW Either 47 2
L18 191st Street SW 80th Avenue W 76th Avenue W Either 47 2
L19 218th Street SW 80th Avenue W 84th Avenue W Either 44 2
L20 192nd Street SW 88th Avenue W 84th Avenue W Either 42 2
L21 104th Street SW/
Robin Hood Drive
238th Street SW 106th Avenue W West 42 2
L22 186th Street SW Seaview Park/
80th Avenue W
8608 185th Place
SW
North 37 2
L23 216th Avenue SW 86th Avenue W 92nd Avenue W South 31 2
Packet Page 793 of 930
Non-Motorized System
June 4, 2009 4-9
ID Street Name From To
Street
Side¹
Total
Points Priority
L24 92nd Avenue W Bowdoin Way 220th Street SW Either 26 2
1. Indicates where proposed walkway improvement is located
2. Project L12 is an L-shaped project in which sidewalks are proposed on either side of Andover Street (the north-south leg), and on the
north side of 184th Street SW (the east-west leg).
Pedestrian access to transit stops is a critical element of the walkway improvement program. The
City will continue to work with Community Transit to ensure that access to transit stops is as
convenient and safe as possible. Community Transit offers its support in securing funds related to
improving access to the existing transit system and transit facilities.
In addition to the projects listed in Table 4-2, a variety of non-motorized enhancements are
scheduled as part of the 4th Avenue Corridor Enhancement project. The City also plans to make
improvements to pedestrian lighting throughout the city.
Packet Page 794 of 930
Main St
76
t
h
A
v
e
W
75
t
h
P
l
W
Oly
m
p
i
c
V
i
e
w
D
r
208th St SW
9 5t
h
P
l
W
212th St SW
220th St SW
Fisher
68
t
h
Av
e
W
F
i
r
d
a
l
e
A
v
e
Dayton St
7t
h
A
v
e
N
10
0
t
h
A ve
W
76
t
h
A
v
e
W
Oly
m
p
i
c
V
i
e
w
D
r
238th St SW
80
t
h
A
v
e
W
96
t
h
A
v
e
W
176th St SW
Bowd
oin
W
a
y
180th St SW
Walnut St
3r
d
A
v
e
S
244th St SW
5 th
A
v
e
S
236th St SW
3rd
Av
e
N
84
t
h
Av
e
W
9t
h
A
v
e
S
238th St SW
200th St SWCaspers St
76
t
h
A
v
e
W
Pug et Dr
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
W
y
Ma
p
l
e
w
o
od
D
r
22 8th St SW
9t
h
A
v
e
N
52
n d A
v
e
W
Meado
w
d
a
l
e
B
e
a
c
h
R
o
a
d
Oly mpic Vie
w Dr
80
t
h
A
v
e
W
88
t
h
A
v
e
W
196th St SW
S u ns
e
t
A
v
e
104
99
524
Snohomish County
King County
L4
L12
L15
L14
L22S9
L13
L17
S10
S7
L18
L20
L3
L2
L7
L11
L16
L1
L10
L8L21
S6
L5
S1
S2
S3
S8
S4
S5
L6
L9
L19
L23
L24
City of Edmonds Comprehensive Transportation Plan
June 2009
Figure 4-3. Existing Walkways and Recommended Walkway Projects
00.51
Miles
Source: City of Edmonds (2008); WSDOT (2008);
Snohomish County (2008)
City Boundary
Railroad
Water Feature
Walkway Project
Existing Paved Walkway
Existing Unpaved Walkway
84th Ave W Safety Project
(includes walkway component)
Packet Page 795 of 930
Non-Motorized System
June 4, 2009 4-11
Curb Ramp Upgrade Program
In an effort to upgrade the sidewalk ramps and meet ADA requirements, the City has developed a
Curb Ramp Upgrade Program that prioritizes future sidewalk ramp improvements at sub-standard
locations.
Citizen request for curb ramps should be addressed as they occur, and should be accommodated
close to the time of the request unless there are circumstances which would cause them to be
deferred, such as a pending construction project that would provide the ramps in a short time
frame. Priorities for future sidewalk new ramp installations or ramp upgrades are determined
based on the following priority order:
1. Downtown intersections receive priority over other locations;
2. Arterial streets receive priority over local access streets;
3. Intersections receive higher priority if they are near:
a. Community centers, senior centers, or health facilities
b. Transit stops, schools, or public buildings
c. Commercial areas and parks.
Implementation of the curb ramp upgrade program will need to occur over time, due to the costs
of those upgrades. As part of asphalt overlay projects, all ramps adjacent to the paving work must
be upgraded to meet ADA standards and new ramps installed where none exist. Sidewalk ramps
will also be installed as part of street reconstruction and sidewalk construction projects. Private
redevelopment will also fund some ramp upgrades as part of required frontage improvements.
Appendix C provides a complete list of the intersection locations and the prioritization criteria.
Bikeway Comprehensive Plan
The City updated its comprehensive Bikeway Plan in 2009. The Bikeway Plan outlines a list of
improvement projects for the bikeway system; and prioritizes bikeway projects, bicycle parking,
and bikeway signage. Before signing the routes, problem catch basin grates are replaced, sight
distance problems are addressed, and potholes and other safety hazards are corrected.
Additionally, the Bikeway Plan includes maintenance of bicycle facilities. Per RCW 35.75.060
and 36.82.145, all bicycle facilities must comply with Chapter 1020 of the WSDOT Design
Manual (WSDOT 2009) which is consistent with the Guide for the Development of Bicycle
Facilities (AASHTO 1999).
In addition to making project recommendations, the Bikeway Plan states several goals for the
bicycle network in Edmonds. These goals are:
Goal 1: To promote more bicycling activity
Goal 2: To provide safer opportunities for those who bicycle in Edmonds
Packet Page 796 of 930
Comprehensive Transportation Plan – Public Review Draft
City of Edmonds 4-12
Goal 3: To provide better service to recreational opportunities for those who bicycle
Goal 4: To provide better service to schools for those who bicycle
Goal 5: To provide better service to businesses for those who bicycle
Goal 6: To provide better service to transit for those who bicycle
Goal 7: To provide connections to bicycling opportunities in other jurisdictions
Goal 8: To consider bicycle facilities and program in all appropriate City transportation
programs and funding
Goal 9: To provide enhanced parking facilities for those who bicycle, making the mode more
convenient
Goal 10: To provide maintenance provisions for City bicycle facilities
The following inventory and recommended bicycle network improvements may be considered as
complements to the Bikeway Comprehensive Plan.
Bicycle Facility Inventory
Figure 4-4 shows existing bicycle facilities within the city, which include bicycle routes, bicycle
lanes, trails, and bicycle parking facilities. Bicycle routes are designated along vehicle travel
lanes that are shared between bicycles and motor vehicles with signing. Bicycle lanes are
dedicated lanes within the traveled roadway that are reserved solely for bicyclists and
distinguished through the use of pavement markings. Bicycle lanes may be located adjacent to the
curbs or parking lanes. Trails are physically separated from vehicular traffic, and are shared with
pedestrians and other non-motorized users.
The Interurban Trail, which links the cities of Seattle, Shoreline, Edmonds, Mountlake Terrace,
Lynnwood, and Everett, runs through the southeastern portion of Edmonds. Upgrades to the trail
are included in the City’s capital improvement program. Trails are also located along the city’s
beaches and within city parks.
There are also easy connections for cyclists to ferries, Sound Transit’s Sounder service, and
Community Transit. Bicycles are allowed on all of these systems; WSF provides a reduced fare
(relative to motorized vehicle fares) for bicycles, Sound Transit provides bike racks, and all
Community Transit vehicles have bike racks.
Packet Page 797 of 930
!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
Main St
76
t
h
A
v
e
W
75
t
h
P
l
W
Oly
m
p
i
c
V
i
e
w
D
r
208th St SW
9 5t
h
P
l
W
212th St SW
220th St SW
Fisher
68
t
h
Av
e
W
F
i
r
d
a
l
e
A
v
e
Dayton St
7t
h
A
v
e
N
10
0
t
h
A ve
W
76
t
h
A
v
e
W
Oly
m
p
i
c
V
i
e
w
D
r
238th St SW
80
t
h
A
v
e
W
96
t
h
A
v
e
W
176th St SW
Bowd
oin
W
a
y
180th St SW
Walnut St
3r
d
A
v
e
S
244th St SW
5 th
A
v
e
S
236th St SW
3rd
Av
e
N
84
t
h
Av
e
W
9t
h
A
v
e
S
238th St SW
200th St SWCaspers St
76
t
h
A
v
e
W
Pug et Dr
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
W
y
Ma
p
l
e
w
o
od
D
r
22 8th St SW
9t
h
A
v
e
N
52
n d A
v
e
W
Meado
w
d
a
l
e
B
e
a
c
h
R
o
a
d
Oly mpic Vie
w Dr
80
t
h
A
v
e
W
88
t
h
A
v
e
W
196th St SW
S u ns
e
t
A
v
e
¾?@104
¾?@99
!"`
¾?@524
Snohomish County
King County
In
t
e
r
u
r
b
a
n
T
r
a
i
l
City of Edmonds Comprehensive Transportation Plan
June 2009
Figure 4-4. Existing Bicycle Facilities
00.51
Miles
Source: City of Edmonds (2008); WSDOT (2008);
Snohomish County (2008); King County (2009)
City Boundary
Railroad
Water Feature
!(Bike Lockers
!(Bike Parking
Bike Lanes
Bike Routes
Trails/Paths
Interim Trail/Path
Interim Route on Roadway
(76th Ave W)
Packet Page 798 of 930
Comprehensive Transportation Plan – Public Review Draft
City of Edmonds 4-14
Recommended Bikeway Improvements
The 2009 Bikeway Comprehensive Plan outlines a list of improvement projects for the bikeway
system. The Bikeway Plan prioritizes bikeway projects, bicycle parking, and bikeway signage.
The types of bikeway facilities that are recommended projects range from shared-use paths to
bike lanes to bicycle parking. Shared-use or multiuse paths are physically separated from
motorized vehicular traffic. They are designed and built primarily for use by bicycles, but are also
used by pedestrians, joggers, skaters, wheelchair users (both non-motorized and motorized),
equestrians, and other non-motorized users. The desirable width of a shared-use path is 12 feet;
the minimum width is 10 feet.
Bike lanes are established along streets in corridors where there is current or anticipated bicycle
demand and where it would be unsafe for bicyclists to ride in the travel lane. Bike lanes delineate
the rights of way assigned to bicyclists and motorists and provide for movements that are more
predictable by each. The minimum width for a bike lane is 4 feet. However, when parking is
permitted along the bike lane, an additional width of 1 to 2 feet is recommended if parking is
substantial or the turnover of parked cars is high. With curb, guardrail, or barrier, the minimum
bike lane width is 5 feet.
Signed shared roadways are shared roadways that have been identified as preferred bike routes by
posting bike route signs. A signed shared roadway bike route is established by placing the Bicycle
Route signs or markers along the roadways according to guidelines set forth in the Manual of
Uniform Traffic Control Devices (FHWA 2001).
The Bikeway Plan categorizes bikeway projects into small bikeway projects and large bikeway
projects. The distinction between these two categories is the funding sources. The small bikeway
projects can be funded entirely through dedicated City funding; large bikeway projects will
require grant funding and may be tied to a major roadway transportation project.
Small Bikeway Projects
Bicycle Loops
Figure 4-5 shows three bicycle loops of various difficulties and lengths that are recommended
along roads that have low speeds and low vehicle volumes. The Edmonds Bike Group helped
establish these three bicycle loops.
The short bicycle loop has an easy level of difficulty and a distance of 5 miles.
The medium bicycle loop is a medium level of difficulty route; it follows a similar route as
the short bicycle loop, but has an additional 2 miles for a total length of 7 miles.
The long bicycle loop is a scenic route designed for experienced cyclists. The total distance
for the long bicycle loop is 20 miles with a portion located in the Town of Woodway.
Packet Page 799 of 930
Non-Motorized System
June 4, 2009 4-15
Shared Use Lanes
Shared use lanes, or “sharrows,” are commonly used to indicate where on the roadway a cyclist
should ride, and also to remind motorists to share the lane with bicycles when present. Sharrows
consist of a roadway striping treatment, with chevron arrows and a bicycle symbol placed on the
outside portion of the travel lane. Approved by FHWA as an experimental treatment (Pedestrian
and Bicycle Information Center 2009) and expected to be included in the next edition of the
Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices, sharrows are a way for many jurisdictions to create
low-cost and safe bicycle facilities. The City intends to create sharrows as necessary as it
completes roadway projects.
Bicycle Parking
In planning for bicycle parking, both public and private property needs must be considered. The
recommended standard for new commercial developments is one bicycle rack for every 12
vehicle spaces provided. The City considers the following criteria when reviewing the suitability
of new bicycle racks:
The bicycle racks shall be as convenient as the majority of automobile parking spaces
provided.
All racks shall be securely anchored to the ground or building structures.
Bicycle racks shall be in a visible location, close to the building entrances.
Bicycle racks must be designed to accommodate U-shaped locks. (U-shaped locks are
designed to allow the lock both wheels and the bicycle frame to a stationary object.)
Figure 4-6 shows the proposed bicycle parking locations identified in the City’s Bikeway Plan.
Packet Page 800 of 930
,,
,
,
,
,,,,
,,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,,
,
,,,,,,
,
,
,
,,,
Main St
7 6 t h
A v e
W
7 5 t h
P l
W
O l y m p i c V i e w D r
208th St SW
9 5 t h
P l
W
212th St SW
220th St SW
F i s h e r
6 8 t h
A v e
W
F
i
r
d
a
l
e
A
v
e
Dayton St
7 t h
A v e
N
1 0 0 t h
A v e
W
7 6 t h
A v e
W
O l y m p i c V i e w D r
238th St SW
8 0 t h
A v e
W
9 6 t h
A v e
W
176th St SW
BowdoinWay
180th St SW
Walnut St
3 r d
A v e
S
244th St SW
5 t h
A v e
S
236th St SW
3 r d A v e N
8 4 t h
A v e
W
9 t h
A v e
S
238th St SW
200th St SWCaspersSt
7 6 t h
A v e
W
Puget Dr
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
W
y
M a p l e w o o d
D r
228th St SW
9 t h
A v e
N
5 2 n d
A v e
W
Meado
w
d
a
l
e
B
e
a
c
h
R
o
a
d
O l y mp i c V i e w D r
8 0 t h
A v e
W
8 8 t h
A v e
W
196th St SW
S u n s e t A v e
¾?@104
¾?@99
!"`
¾?@524
Snohomish County
King County
City of Edmonds Comprehensive Transportation Plan
June 2009
Figure 4-5. Recommended Signed Bicycle Loops
0 0.5 1
Miles
Source: City of Edmonds (2008); WSDOT (2008);
Snohomish County (2008)
City Boundary
Railroad
Water Feature
Bike Routes
Short Loop (5 miles)
Medium Loop (7 miles)
Long Loop (20 miles)
,
,
,
Steep Grade/Long Hill
Packet Page 801 of 930
Non-Motorized System
June 4, 2009 4-17
Large Bicycle Projects
Figure 4-6 shows the locations of the proposed bicycle routes and bicycle lanes. The large
bikeway projects include bicycle lanes or bicycle routes that can be added as part of future
roadway improvement projects. The large bikeway projects are concentrated around two major
efforts: creating a north-south bicycle connection between downtown Edmonds and the
Interurban Trail, and creating an east-west bicycle connection between the northern and southern
portions of Edmonds.
The north-south bicycle projects include:
84th Avenue W, 238th Street SW - 212th Street SW
80th Avenue W, 220th Street SW - 206th Street SW
76th Avenue W, 224th Street SW - N Meadowdale Beach Drive
The east-west bicycle projects include:
Edmonds Way/Sunset Avenue, Edmonds Street - city limits
224th Street SW, 100th Avenue W - the Interurban Trail
Other large bikeway projects include:
Olympic View Drive, Puget Drive - 76th Avenue W (less steep route)
3rd Avenue N, Main Street - Caspers Street
Caspers Street, 3rd Avenue N - 9th Avenue N
9th Avenue N, Caspers Street - Puget Drive
Interurban Trail – Complete trail between the cities of Shoreline and Mountlake Terrace. The
planned alignment runs roughly parallel to 76th Avenue W, south of 228th Street SW.
Packet Page 802 of 930
!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.!.
!.
!(
Main St
76
t
h
A
v
e
W
75
t
h
P
l
W
Oly
m
p
i
c
V
i
e
w
D
r
208th St SW
9 5t
h
P
l
W
212th St SW
220th St SW
Fisher
68
t
h
Av
e
W
F
i
r
d
a
l
e
A
v
e
Dayton St
7t
h
A
v
e
N
10
0
t
h
A ve
W
76
t
h
A
v
e
W
Oly
m
p
i
c
V
i
e
w
D
r
238th St SW
80
t
h
A
v
e
W
96
t
h
A
v
e
W
176th St SW
Bowd
oin
W
a
y
180th St SW
Walnut St
3r
d
A
v
e
S
244th St SW
5 th
A
v
e
S
236th St SW
3rd
Av
e
N
84
t
h
Av
e
W
9t
h
A
v
e
S
238th St SW
200th St SWCaspers St
76
t
h
A
v
e
W
Pug et Dr
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
W
y
Ma
p
l
e
w
o
od
D
r
22 8th St SW
9t
h
A
v
e
N
52
n d A
v
e
W
Meado
w
d
a
l
e
B
e
a
c
h
R
o
a
d
Oly mpic Vie
w Dr
80
t
h
A
v
e
W
88
t
h
A
v
e
W
196th St SW
S u ns
e
t
A
v
e
¾?@104
¾?@99
!"`
¾?@524
Snohomish County
King County
In
t
e
r
u
r
b
a
n
T
r
a
i
l
City of Edmonds Comprehensive Transportation Plan
June 2009
Figure 4-6. Recommended Bicycle Facilities
00.51
Miles
Source: City of Edmonds (2008); WSDOT (2008);
Snohomish County (2008)
City Boundary
Railroad
Water Feature
!(Existing Bike Lockers
!(Existing Bike Parking
!.Proposed Bike Parking
Bike Lanes
Existing
Proposed
Bike Routes
Existing
Proposed
Trails/Paths
Existing
Interim
Proposed
Interim Route on Roadway
(76th Ave W)
Bike Lanes
Bike Routes
Trails/Paths
Packet Page 803 of 930
June 4, 2009 5-1
Chapter 5. Transit and Transportation Demand
Management
This chapter provides an inventory of existing transit facilities and services, including buses, rail
and ferries. Strategies to increase transit use including Transportation Demand Management and
other transit improvements are then presented.
Existing Transit Service
Community Transit
Community Transit, the major provider of public transit for Snohomish County, operates three
types of transit service in the city:
Fixed bus route service
Rideshare services
Dial-A-Ride Transit (DART) paratransit service
Fixed Route Bus Service
Fixed bus routes are local or commuter services that operate on a standardized schedule. Figure 5-
1 shows the bus routes that serve the city.
Table 5-1 summarizes local bus routes serving the city, which provide two-way service between
destinations in the city and surrounding areas, from morning through evening.
Table 5-2 summarizes commuter bus routes serving the city, which provide service to major
employment destinations in Snohomish and King Counties. Commuter routes typically operate
only during the weekday morning and evening peak commute periods. Every Community Transit
bus is equipped to accommodate wheelchairs. All buses are also equipped with bicycle racks.
Packet Page 804 of 930
Main St
76
t
h
A
v
e
W
75
t
h
P
l
W
Oly
m
p
i
c
V
i
e
w
D
r
208th St SW
9 5t
h
P
l
W
212th St SW
220th St SW
Fisher
68
t
h
Av
e
W
F
i
r
d
a
l
e
A
v
e
Dayton St
7t
h
A
v
e
N
10
0
t
h
A ve
W
76
t
h
A
v
e
W
Oly
m
p
i
c
V
i
e
w
D
r
238th St SW
80
t
h
A
v
e
W
96
t
h
A
v
e
W
176th St SW
Bowd
oin
W
a
y
180th St SW
Walnut St
3r
d
A
v
e
S
244th St SW
5 th
A
v
e
S
236th St SW
3rd
Av
e
N
84
t
h
Av
e
W
9t
h
A
v
e
S
238th St SW
200th St SWCaspers St
76
t
h
A
v
e
W
Pug et Dr
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
W
y
Ma
p
l
e
w
o
od
D
r
22 8th St SW
9t
h
A
v
e
N
52
n d A
v
e
W
Meado
w
d
a
l
e
B
e
a
c
h
R
o
a
d
Oly mpic Vie
w Dr
80
t
h
A
v
e
W
88
t
h
A
v
e
W
196th St SW
S u ns
e
t
A
v
e
IA
IA
IA
IA
Æb
¾?@104
¾?@99
!"`
¾?@524
Snohomish County
King County
QR119
QR112
QR130
QR114
QR114QR114
QR131
QR118
QR116
QR131
QR115 QR116QR115
QR118
QR131
QR130
QR112
QR130
QR112
QR110
QR110
QR100
QR110
QR190
QR119
QR110
QR131
QR119
QR131
QR190
QR101
QR114
QR115 QR118
QR110
QR408QR405
QR401QR406
QR411
QR416
QR404
QR405
QR435
QR421
QR412
QR416
QR410
QR417
QR422QR425
QR413
QR406
QR477
QR404
QR414
QR441
QR414
QR441
QR408
QR415
QR402
QR404
QR477
QR404
QR406
QR416
QR513
QR510QR511
QR851
QR871
QR855
QR870
QR810
QR810
QR812QR821
QR871
QR880
QR860
QR870
QR870
QR885
QR870
QR810
QR851
QR871
QR871
QR870
!"`
Ed
m
o
n
d
s
-
K
i
n
gst
o
n
To
/
F
r
o
m
E
v
e
r
e
t
t
T
o
/
F
r
o
m
S
e
a
t
t
l
e
City of Edmonds Comprehensive Transportation Plan
June 2009
Figure 5-1. Fixed Route Bus Service
00.51
Miles
Source: City of Edmonds (2008); WSDOT (2008);
Snohomish County (2008)
City Boundary
Railroad
Water Feature
Æb Train Station/Park & Ride Lot
IA Park & Ride Lot
Existing Bus Routes
QR Community Transit Commuter Route
QR Community Transit Local Route
QR Sound Transit Express Route
Swift Bus Rapid Transit Route
Ferry Route
Commuter Rail Route
Packet Page 805 of 930
Transit and Transportation Demand Management
June 4, 2009 5-3
Table 5-1. Community Transit Local Bus Routes
Route
Number Route Description
Days of
Operation
Hours of Operation
(approximate)
2008 Average
Weekday Daily
Boardings
101 Aurora Village (Shoreline) to
Everett
Daily 5:00 am – 1:30 am (Weekdays);
5:00 am -12:30 am (Saturdays); 6:00
am- 12:30 am (Sundays)
4,007
110 Lynnwood Transit Center to
Edmonds Senior Center
Daily 5:40 am- 9:40 pm (Weekdays); 6:45
am- 8:40 pm (Weekends)
525
112 Lynnwood Transit Center to
Edmonds Community College
Daily 5:20 am-11:40 pm (Weekdays); 6:40
am-10:40 pm (Saturdays); 6:40 am-
8:40 am (Sundays)
1,225
114 Mill Creek/Silver Firs to Edmonds
Senior Center
Daily 5:00 am-10:30 pm (Weekdays); 6:30
am-11:00 pm (Saturdays); 6:30 am-
9:00 pm (Sundays)
729
115 Mays Pond/Mill Creek to
Edmonds Senior Center
Weekdays and
Saturdays
5:20 am- 12:00 am (Weekdays);
8:00 am-7:30 pm (Saturdays)
1,698
116 Mill Creek/Silver Firs to Edmonds
Senior Center
Weekdays 5:00 am-11:30 pm (Weekdays) 726
118 Aurora Village (Shoreline) to Ash
Way Park-and-Ride (Lynnwood)
Daily 5:30 am-11:45 pm (Weekdays); 6:45
am-10:40 pm (Saturdays); 6:45 am-
8:40 pm (Sundays)
1,849
131 Aurora Village (Shoreline) to
Edmonds Community College
Transit Center
Daily 5:00 am-10:00 pm (Weekdays); 6:00
am-9:00 pm (Weekends)
702
Source: Community Transit 2009
Table 5-2. Community Transit Commuter Bus Routes
Route
Number Route Description
Days of
Operation
Hours of Operation
(approximate)
2008 Average
Weekday Daily
Boardings
100 Shoreline to Everett Weekdays 5:00 am- 8:45 am (northbound only)
and 3:00 pm-7:00 pm (southbound
only)
515
190 Edmonds Community College to
Mukilteo
Weekdays 6:30 am-10:00 am (southbound only)
and 11:30 am-8:20 pm (northbound
only)
221
404/405 Edmonds to Downtown Seattle Weekdays 5:15 am-8:45 am (southbound only)
and 3:15 pm-7:30 pm (northbound
only)
383
406 Seaview (Edmonds) to
Downtown Seattle
Weekdays 6:00 am-9:00 am (southbound only)
and 3:30 pm-7:00 pm (northbound
only)
244
Packet Page 806 of 930
Comprehensive Transportation Plan – Public Review Draft
City of Edmonds 5-4
Route
Number Route Description
Days of
Operation
Hours of Operation
(approximate)
2008 Average
Weekday Daily
Boardings
416 Edmonds to Downtown Seattle Weekdays 5:30 am-8:45 am (southbound only)
and 3:30 pm-7:15 pm (northbound
only)
352
441 Edmonds Park-and-Ride to
Redmond
Weekdays 6:15 am-8:00 am (southeast bound
only) and 4:30 pm-6:20 pm
(northwest bound only)
99
810 Everett to University District
(Seattle)
Weekdays 9:15 am-1:20 pm (both directions)
and 6:30 pm-10:45 pm (northbound
only)
296
870/871 Edmonds to University District
(Seattle)
Weekdays 6:00 am-10:20 am (southbound only)
and 12:30 pm-6:40 pm (northbound
only)
415
Source: Community Transit 2009
Accessibility to fixed route transit is considered to be ideal when transit stops are located within
0.25 mile of residents. Figure 5-2 shows the proportion of Edmonds within 0.25 mile of a fixed-
route local or commuter transit service; and Figure 5-3 shows the proportion of Edmonds within
0.25 mile of fixed-route local bus service. The figures show that approximately 64% of the
Edmonds population lives within 0.25 mile of local bus service; and approximately 81% of the
Edmonds population lives within 0.25 mile of either local or commuter service.
Packet Page 807 of 930
Main St
76
t
h
A
v
e
W
75
t
h
P
l
W
Oly
m
p
i
c
V
i
e
w
D
r
208th St SW
9 5t
h
P
l
W
212th St SW
220th St SW
Fisher
68
t
h
Av
e
W
F
i
r
d
a
l
e
A
v
e
Dayton St
7t
h
A
v
e
N
10
0
t
h
A ve
W
76
t
h
A
v
e
W
Oly
m
p
i
c
V
i
e
w
D
r
238th St SW
80
t
h
A
v
e
W
96
t
h
A
v
e
W
176th St SW
Bowd
oin
W
a
y
180th St SW
Walnut St
3r
d
A
v
e
S
244th St SW
5 th
A
v
e
S
236th St SW
3rd
Av
e
N
84
t
h
Av
e
W
9t
h
A
v
e
S
238th St SW
200th St SWCaspers St
76
t
h
A
v
e
W
Pug et Dr
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
W
y
Ma
p
l
e
w
o
od
D
r
22 8th St SW
9t
h
A
v
e
N
52
n d A
v
e
W
Meado
w
d
a
l
e
B
e
a
c
h
R
o
a
d
Oly mpic Vie
w Dr
80
t
h
A
v
e
W
88
t
h
A
v
e
W
196th St SW
S u ns
e
t
A
v
e
IA
IA
IA
IA
Æb
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(!(!(
!(!(!(!(!(
!(!(
!(!(!(!(
!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(
!(!(
!(!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(!(!(!(!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(!(!(
!(!(
!(!(!(
!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(
!(!(
!(!(!(
!(!(!(!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(!(
!(!(!(!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
¾?@104
¾?@99
!"`
¾?@524
Snohomish County
King County
!"`
Ed
m
o
n
d
s
-
K
i
n
gst
o
n
To
/
F
r
o
m
E
v
e
r
e
t
t
T
o
/
F
r
o
m
S
e
a
t
t
l
e
City of Edmonds Comprehensive Transportation Plan
June 2009
Figure 5-2. Access to Local and Commuter Transit
00.51
Miles
Source: City of Edmonds (2008); WSDOT (2008);
Snohomish County (2008)
City Boundary
Railroad
Water Feature
Æb Train Station/Park & Ride Lot
IA Park & Ride Lot
!(Community Transit Bus Stop
Existing Bus Routes
Ferry Route
Commuter Rail Route
1/4-Mile Bus Stop Zone
Approximately 81% of 2000 population
located within 1/4 mile of a transit stop.
Packet Page 808 of 930
Main St
76
t
h
A
v
e
W
75
t
h
P
l
W
Oly
m
p
i
c
V
i
e
w
D
r
208th St SW
9 5t
h
P
l
W
212th St SW
220th St SW
Fisher
68
t
h
Av
e
W
F
i
r
d
a
l
e
A
v
e
Dayton St
7t
h
A
v
e
N
10
0
t
h
A ve
W
76
t
h
A
v
e
W
Oly
m
p
i
c
V
i
e
w
D
r
238th St SW
80
t
h
A
v
e
W
96
t
h
A
v
e
W
176th St SW
Bowd
oin
W
a
y
180th St SW
Walnut St
3r
d
A
v
e
S
244th St SW
5 th
A
v
e
S
236th St SW
3rd
Av
e
N
84
t
h
Av
e
W
9t
h
A
v
e
S
238th St SW
200th St SWCaspers St
76
t
h
A
v
e
W
Pug et Dr
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
W
y
Ma
p
l
e
w
o
od
D
r
22 8th St SW
9t
h
A
v
e
N
52
n d A
v
e
W
Meado
w
d
a
l
e
B
e
a
c
h
R
o
a
d
Oly mpic Vie
w Dr
80
t
h
A
v
e
W
88
t
h
A
v
e
W
196th St SW
S u ns
e
t
A
v
e
IA
IA
IA
IA
Æb
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(!(
!(!(!(!(
!(!(
!(!(!(!(
!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(!(!(!(!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(!(!(
!(!(
!(!(!(
!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(!(!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
¾?@104
¾?@99
!"`
¾?@524
Snohomish County
King County
!"`
Ed
m
o
n
d
s
-
K
i
n
gst
o
n
To
/
F
r
o
m
E
v
e
r
e
t
t
T
o
/
F
r
o
m
S
e
a
t
t
l
e
City of Edmonds Comprehensive Transportation Plan
June 2009
Figure 5-3. Access to Local Transit
00.51
Miles
Source: City of Edmonds (2008); WSDOT (2008);
Snohomish County (2008)
City Boundary
Railroad
Water Feature
Æb Train Station/Park & Ride Lot
IA Park & Ride Lot
!(Community Transit Bus Stop- Local Route
Existing Bus Routes
Ferry Route
Commuter Rail Route
1/4 mile Local Route Bus Stop
Approximately 64% of 2000 population
located within 1/4 mile of a local bus stop.
Packet Page 809 of 930
Transit and Transportation Demand Management
June 4, 2009 5-7
Rideshare Services
For citizens who are disinclined or unable to use fixed-route bus service, the following rideshare
services are available:
Commuter Vanpools –Community Transit provides vehicles, driver orientation, vehicle
maintenance, and assistance in forming vanpool groups. Community Transit currently
manages nine vanpools originating in Edmonds that serve the following employment
destinations:
- Amgen in Seattle
- Bangor (2 vans)
- Boeing Everett (2 vans)
- Dept. of Defense in Keyport
- FAA in Renton
- Holmes Electric in Bellevue
- Raytheon in Keyport
Carpools – Community Transit provides ride-matching services for people seeking carpool
partners.
DART Paratransit
DART is a specialized bus service provided by Community Transit for those who are unable to
use regular bus service due to a disability. Service is available to all origins and destinations
within 0.75 mile of local, non-commuter bus routes.
King County Metro Transit
King County Metro does not provide local service within Edmonds, but connections are available
between Community Transit and Metro routes at the Aurora Village Transit Center just south of
the city.
Sound Transit Express Bus
Sound Transit (ST), which provides regional bus service to the urban portions of Snohomish,
King, and Pierce counties, does not have an established express bus stop in Edmonds. However,
ST express bus service is available at transit centers or park-and-ride lots in the vicinity of
Edmonds (Swamp Creek, Lynnwood Transit Center, Mountlake Terrace Transit Center) and can
be accessed by Community Transit.
Packet Page 810 of 930
Comprehensive Transportation Plan – Public Review Draft
City of Edmonds 5-8
Park-and-Ride Facilities
The primary commuter parking facility in the city is the Edmonds park-and-ride lot located at
72nd Avenue West and 213th Place SW. This facility, which has a capacity for 255 cars, is
owned by WSDOT and operated by Community Transit. This facility offers bus service to
Lynnwood, downtown Seattle, Redmond, Everett, Shoreline and Seattle’s University District.
The average utilization rate of this facility is 71% (Community Transit 2008).
Many routes also serve the Edmonds Senior Center, Edmonds Station and Edmonds Ferry
Terminal. Parking available in the vicinity of these facilities includes a total of 220 spaces near
the ferry terminal and 179 spaces at the Edmonds Station. Edmonds Community College also
serves as a transit hub, but no public parking is available at this location. Table 5-3 summarizes
the park-and-ride lots that serve Edmonds.
Table 5-3. Park-and-Ride Facilities Serving Edmonds
Lot Name Location Routes Parking Capacity
Edgewood Baptist Church 20406 76th Avenue W 112, 406 10
Edmonds Lutheran Church 8330 212th Street SW 118, 131, 404, 870 10
Westgate Chapel 22901 Edmonds Way 416 9
Edmonds Lutheran Church 23525 84th Avenue W 118 21
Korean United Presbyterian Church 8506 238th Street SW 416 64
Edmonds Park-and-Ride 21300 72nd Avenue W 110, 404, 405, 406, 441,
810, 870, 871
255
Mountlake Terrace Transit Center 236th Street SW and
I-5 Northbound Ramp
130, 408, 414, 810, 851,
871, King County Metro
880
Edmonds Ferry Terminal SR 104 WSF 220
Edmonds Station 210 Railroad Avenue Sounder, Amtrak 179
Source: Community Transit, Sound Transit and WSF
Outside of the city, the Lynnwood Transit Center and Aurora Village Transit Center are the major
hubs for transferring between Community Transit local routes. Other transfer hubs include
Edmonds Community College and Mountlake Terrace Transit Center. These Community Transit
routes connect with King County Metro service at Aurora Village, Mountlake Terrace, and
Bothell; Everett Transit in the City of Everett; the Washington State Ferry at the Edmonds and
Mukilteo Terminals; with Sound Transit at various park-and-ride lots in the south Snohomish
County; and Island Transit in the City of Stanwood.
Rail Service
Passenger rail service in Edmonds is provided by Sound Transit’s Sounder commuter rail and
Amtrak’s intercity rail. The rail station is located at 211 Railroad Avenue and can be accessed by
Community Transit.
Packet Page 811 of 930
Transit and Transportation Demand Management
June 4, 2009 5-9
Sounder Commuter Rail
The Sounder commuter rail line operates between Seattle and Everett, with stops in Edmonds and
Mukilteo. Through a partnership with Amtrak, Amtrak trains are also available for commuters
along this route. Sounder operates four southbound trains during the morning commute period
and four northbound trains during the evening commute period. Amtrak operates one additional
train in each direction during both the morning commute period and the evening commute period.
Amtrak Service
Amtrak operates two routes with stops in Edmonds: the Amtrak Cascades and the Empire
Builder.
Amtrak Cascades
Edmonds serves as a stop along the Seattle – Vancouver route. Service is daily, with two
northbound trains (8:07 am and 7:07 pm) and two southbound trains (10:21 am and 9:19 pm)
stopping in Edmonds per day. From Edmonds, one of the two northbound trains terminates in
Bellingham while the other terminates in Vancouver, British Columbia. One southbound
Cascades train originates in Bellingham while the other begins in Vancouver, BC.
The Cascades route’s northbound service provides connections to Everett, Mount Vernon, and
Bellingham in Washington State, and Surrey, Richmond, and Vancouver in British Columbia.
Southbound service terminates in Seattle. Travelers who wish to take rail south to destinations
between Seattle and Portland are best served by traveling to Seattle to take the Seattle–Portland
route.
Empire Builder
The Empire Builder provides cross-country service between Seattle and Chicago. Its route
traverses the states of Washington, Idaho, Montana, North Dakota, Minnesota, Wisconsin, and
Illinois. Service is daily, with one eastbound train departing from Edmonds each evening (5:17
pm). One westbound train arrives in Edmonds each morning (9:05 am).
Washington State Ferries
The Edmonds-Kingston ferry route connects the northern portion of the Kitsap Peninsula and the
Olympic Peninsula with northern King and southern Snohomish Counties. The route is 4.5
nautical miles long, and takes approximately 30 minutes to traverse. The Edmonds-Kingston
route operates seven days per week year round, with average headways ranging between 35 and
75 minutes.
In 2006, the Edmonds-Kingston route carried 4.3 million people, at an average of 12,200
passengers per day (WSF Origin Destination Onboard Survey 2006). A 2006 Washington State
Ferries (WSF) survey indicates that in-vehicle boardings were the most prevalent, with about 87
Packet Page 812 of 930
Comprehensive Transportation Plan – Public Review Draft
City of Edmonds 5-10
percent of passengers boarding in this manner on the average weekday. Walk-on passengers
constituted 13 percent of all passengers on an average weekday. The WSF survey indicates that
during the PM peak period (3 PM to 7 PM), approximately two-thirds of the total passengers on
the Edmonds-Kingston route are traveling west to the Kitsap / Olympic Peninsulas from
Edmonds, and about one-third are traveling eastbound to Edmonds from the west.
Transportation Demand Management
TDM consists of strategies that seek to maximize the efficiency of the transportation system by
reducing demand on the system. The results of successful TDM can include the following
benefits:
Travelers switch from driving alone to high-occupancy vehicle modes such as transit,
vanpools, or carpools.
Travelers switch from driving to non-motorized modes such as bicycling or walking.
Travelers change the time they make trips from more congested to less congested times of
day.
Travelers eliminate trips altogether either through means such as compressed work weeks,
consolidation of errands, or use of telecommunications.
Within the State of Washington, alternative transportation solutions are necessitated by the
objectives of the Commute Trip Reduction (CTR) Law. Passed in 1991 as a section of the
Washington Clean Air Act (RCW 70.94), the CTR Law seeks to reduce workplace commute
trips. The purpose of CTR is to help maintain air quality in metropolitan areas by reducing
congestion and air pollution. This law requires Edmonds to adopt a CTR plan requiring private
and public employers with 100 or more employees to implement TDM programs. Programs
provide various incentives or disincentives to encourage use of alternative transportation modes
other than the single-occupant vehicle.
The City promotes TDM through policy and/or investments that may include, but are not limited
to, the following:
Parking management;
Trip reduction ordinances;
Restricted access to facilities and activity centers; and
Transit-oriented and pedestrian-friendly design.
The City can support the CTR Law and regional vehicle trip reduction strategies by working with
employers to encourage the reduction of commuter single-occupant vehicle use. Community
Transit assists employers in developing plans that meet specific trip reduction needs as required
by the CTR Law. Flex time, parking management, vanpooling, and carpooling are some of the
available options. Community Transit offers free Employee Transportation Coordinator Training
Packet Page 813 of 930
Transit and Transportation Demand Management
June 4, 2009 5-11
Workshops for employers affected by CTR. Transportation consulting services are also available
to interested employers not affected by CTR. Community Transit also conducts community
outreach programs that fall within the realm of TDM.
There are three employers in Edmonds that participate in the CTR program: the City of Edmonds,
Stevens Hospital, and Edmonds Family Medicine Clinic. Each employer measures its progress
toward its goal of reducing single-occupant vehicle trips by conducting an employee survey every
other year. Community Transit assists in this effort, and reviews the results to see if the
employers are in compliance with CTR goals.
Future Transit Improvements
Chapter 2 of this Transportation Plan identifies a number of specific goals, objectives and policies
aiming at enhancing transit options and operations in the City. One of the City’s goals is to
“prioritize and finance improvements for the greatest public benefit, emphasizing transit, demand
management, and maintenance of current facilities”.
Bus Shelters and Benches
Providing additional shelters and benches at bus stops has been identified as a high priority for
the City. At all appropriate locations, sidewalk improvement or construction projects will include
the creation of boarding pads to allow for shelters. The City will continue to work with
Community Transit to ensure that bus stops and shelters fit in with the local street design.
Community Transit is also committed to expanding the number of locations with stop shelters,
adding 25 new locations each year (on the entire system) in addition to maintaining and replacing
existing shelters. Table 5-4 lists the top priority locations identified by the City for bus shelters
and seating.
Table 5-4. Top Priority Locations for Bus Shelters and Seating
Ranking Location Shelter Bench
Simme
Seat1 Comments
1 7901 212th Street SW X X Located across from Edmonds
High School fence right behind
back sidewalk. Additional right
of way needed.
2 123 3rd Avenue S X
3 1675 220th Street SW X X
4 126 3rd Avenue S X X
5 3rd Avenue N @
Edmonds Street (NB)
X X
8 Dayton Street (in front of
Old Milltown)
X X Additional right of way needed.
Packet Page 814 of 930
Comprehensive Transportation Plan – Public Review Draft
City of Edmonds 5-12
Ranking Location Shelter Bench
Simme
Seat1 Comments
7 220th Street SW in front
Top Foods
X X Additional right of way needed.
9 7805 220th Street SW X
10 8330 212th Street SW X
11 7407 212th Street SW X
12 12810 76th Avenue W X
13 12827 76th Avenue W X
14 Dayton @ 5th (WB) X existing shelter with bank
roofing
15 233 3rd Avenue N X existing shelter with complex
roofing
16 533 5th Avenue S X limited space for bus shelter
because building structure
17 1054 Bowdoin Way X
18 1051 Walnut Street X
19 8415 238th Street SW X
1. A Simme-Seat is a double seat that is attached to a bus stop pole.
Transit Emphasis Corridors
Community Transit’s Six Year Transit Development Plan and 20 Year Long Range Plan describe
a network of Transit Emphasis Corridors on arterial streets and highways connecting urban
centers in Snohomish County. SR 99 and 196th Street SW are Transit Emphasis Corridors in
Edmonds. The long-term vision for these corridors is coordinated land use, infrastructure, and
transit planning that will encourage transit market development and will enable effective service
by Community Transit. The Transit Development Plan calls for increasing the frequency and span
of local service providing east-west connections across south Snohomish County between Mill
Creek, Lynnwood and Edmonds including the 164th St SW and 196th St SW transit emphasis
corridors.
Swift Bus Rapid Transit
This process is moving forward on SR 99 with the implementation of Swift Bus Rapid Transit
(BRT), which will begin service in fall 2009. Swift will operate throughout the day, seven days a
week, providing service between Shoreline and Everett. Swift will operate with 10-minute
frequency from 5:00 am to 7:00 pm, and with 20-minute frequency from 7:00 pm to midnight and
on weekends. Swift BRT will serve landmark stations located at approximately one mile intervals
along the route. The City worked closely with Community Transit on the Swift BRT alignment
Packet Page 815 of 930
Transit and Transportation Demand Management
June 4, 2009 5-13
and station locations. There are two stations located along SR 99 in Edmonds: at 238th St SW and
at 216th St SW. Local service on Route 101 will continue to operate in the corridor.
Additional Fixed Route Transit Service
The City will continue to coordinate with Community Transit regarding additional bus transit
service on Olympic View Drive or east of 76th Avenue N.
In addition, the City has adopted a policy (see Policy 8.12 in Chapter 2) to explore future funding
for a city-based circulator bus that provides local shuttle service between neighborhoods (Firdale
Village, Perrinville, Five Corners, Westgate) and downtown.
Edmonds Crossing Multimodal Facility
The City is also a partner in the Edmonds Crossing multimodal ferry, bus, and rail facility. Sound
Transit is planning to relocate Edmonds station as part of the larger Edmonds Crossing
Multimodal project being led by WSDOT. The location of the preferred alternative for the
multimodal project in the Final Environmental Impact Statement would relocate the station south
of Edmonds marina, near Point Edwards. The project would also improve traffic circulation in
downtown Edmonds by eliminating at-grade railroad crossings. The Washington legislature
approved $4 million for the project during the 2007-2009 biennium. However, funding for the
remaining $122 million is not secured.
Packet Page 816 of 930
Packet Page 817 of 930
June 4, 2009 6-1
Chapter 6. Implementation and Financial Plan
This chapter provides a summary of the projects, project prioritization, total costs, projected
revenue, and implementation strategies for recommended improvements through 2025.
Project Costs
Preliminary costs for proposed transportation projects were estimated at a planning level, based
on 2009 dollars. Estimates were based on typical unit costs, as applied to each type of
improvement, and are not the result of preliminary engineering. Annual programs such as asphalt
street overlay show projected expenditures beginning in 2010. These planning-level estimates of
probable cost were the basis for the financial plan.
Table 6-1 summarizes the estimated costs for the recommended transportation projects and
programs through 2025. The table shows that the cost of fully funding all operations, safety, and
maintenance projects and programs through 2025, as presented in this Transportation Plan, is
$105,213,300.
Packet Page 818 of 930
Co
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
–
P
u
b
l
i
c
R
e
v
i
e
w
D
r
a
f
t
Ci
t
y
o
f
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
Ju
n
e
4
,
2
0
0
9
Ta
b
l
e
6
-
1
.
C
o
s
t
s
o
f
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
ID
L
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
Co
s
t
Co
n
c
u
r
r
e
n
c
y
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
-
b
y
2
0
1
5
2
Ol
y
m
p
i
c
V
i
e
w
D
r
i
v
e
/
7
6
t
h
A
v
e
n
u
e
W
I
n
s
t
a
l
l
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
s
i
g
n
a
l
.
W
i
d
e
n
7
6
t
h
t
o
a
d
d
a
w
e
s
t
b
o
u
n
d
l
e
f
t
t
u
r
n
l
a
n
e
f
o
r
1
7
5
-
f
o
o
t
st
o
r
a
g
e
l
e
n
g
t
h
.
$1
,
1
4
6
,
8
0
0
4
Pu
g
e
t
D
r
i
v
e
/
1
9
6
t
h
S
t
S
W
/
8
8
t
h
A
v
e
n
u
e
W
I
n
s
t
a
l
l
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
s
i
g
n
a
l
.
$8
7
9
,
0
0
0
6
Ca
s
p
e
r
s
S
t
r
e
e
t
/
9
t
h
A
v
e
n
u
e
N
I
n
s
t
a
l
l
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
s
i
g
n
a
l
.
$8
1
8
,
0
0
0
9
21
2
t
h
S
t
r
e
e
t
S
W
/
7
6
t
h
A
v
e
n
u
e
W
W
i
d
e
n
7
6
t
h
t
o
a
d
d
a
n
o
r
t
h
b
o
u
n
d
l
e
f
t
t
u
r
n
l
a
n
e
f
o
r
2
5
0
-
f
o
o
t
s
t
o
r
a
g
e
l
e
n
g
t
h
a
n
d
a
so
u
t
h
b
o
u
n
d
l
e
f
t
t
u
r
n
l
a
n
e
f
o
r
1
2
5
-
f
o
o
t
s
t
o
r
a
g
e
l
e
n
g
t
h
.
P
r
o
v
i
d
e
p
r
o
t
e
c
t
e
d
l
e
f
t
t
u
r
n
ph
a
s
e
f
o
r
n
o
r
t
h
b
o
u
n
d
a
n
d
s
o
u
t
h
b
o
u
n
d
m
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
.
W
i
d
e
n
2
1
2
t
h
t
o
a
d
d
a
we
s
t
b
o
u
n
d
r
i
g
h
t
t
u
r
n
l
a
n
e
f
o
r
5
0
-
f
o
o
t
s
t
o
r
a
g
e
l
e
n
g
t
h
.
$2
,
3
1
3
,
8
0
0
10
21
2
t
h
S
t
r
e
e
t
S
W
/
8
4
t
h
A
v
e
n
u
e
W
I
n
s
t
a
l
l
a
s
i
n
g
l
e
-
l
a
n
e
r
o
u
n
d
a
b
o
u
t
.
$1
,
9
1
0
,
1
0
0
11
Ma
i
n
S
t
r
e
e
t
/
9
t
h
A
v
e
n
u
e
N
I
n
s
t
a
l
l
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
s
i
g
n
a
l
.
$8
7
4
,
4
0
0
12
Wa
l
n
u
t
S
t
r
e
e
t
/
9
t
h
A
v
e
n
u
e
S
I
n
s
t
a
l
l
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
s
i
g
n
a
l
.
$8
7
4
,
4
0
0
15
22
0
t
h
S
t
r
e
e
t
S
W
/
7
6
t
h
A
v
e
n
u
e
W
R
e
c
o
n
f
i
g
u
r
e
e
a
s
t
b
o
u
n
d
l
a
n
e
s
t
o
a
l
e
f
t
t
u
r
n
l
a
n
e
a
n
d
a
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
-
r
i
g
h
t
l
a
n
e
.
C
h
a
n
g
e
ea
s
t
b
o
u
n
d
a
n
d
w
e
s
t
b
o
u
n
d
p
h
a
s
e
t
o
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
p
r
o
t
e
c
t
e
d
-
p
e
r
m
i
t
t
e
d
p
h
a
s
e
f
o
r
ea
s
t
b
o
u
n
d
l
e
f
t
t
u
r
n
.
P
r
o
v
i
d
e
r
i
g
h
t
t
u
rn
p
h
a
s
e
f
o
r
w
e
s
t
b
o
u
n
d
m
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
d
u
r
i
n
g
so
u
t
h
b
o
u
n
d
l
e
f
t
t
u
r
n
p
h
a
s
e
.
$1
3
8
,
3
0
0
Su
b
T
o
t
a
l
$
8
,
9
5
4
,
8
0
0
Co
n
c
u
r
r
e
n
c
y
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
-
b
y
2
0
2
5
1
17
4
t
h
S
t
r
e
e
t
S
W
/
O
l
y
m
p
i
c
V
i
e
w
D
r
i
v
e
W
i
d
e
n
O
l
y
m
p
i
c
V
i
e
w
D
r
t
o
a
d
d
a
n
o
r
t
h
b
o
u
n
d
l
e
f
t
t
u
r
n
l
a
n
e
f
o
r
5
0
-
f
o
o
t
s
t
o
r
a
g
e
l
e
n
g
t
h
.
Sh
i
f
t
t
h
e
n
o
r
t
h
b
o
u
n
d
l
a
n
e
s
t
o
t
h
e
e
a
s
t
t
o
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
a
n
a
c
c
e
l
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
l
a
n
e
f
o
r
e
a
s
t
b
o
u
n
d
le
f
t
t
u
r
n
s
.
$7
2
4
,
2
0
0
Packet Page 819 of 930
Im
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
F
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
P
l
a
n
Ju
n
e
4
,
2
0
0
9
ID
L
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
Co
s
t
8
21
2
t
h
S
t
r
e
e
t
S
W
/
S
R
9
9
W
i
d
e
n
2
1
2
t
h
t
o
a
d
d
a
w
e
s
t
b
o
u
n
d
l
e
f
t
t
u
r
n
l
a
n
e
f
o
r
2
0
0
-
f
o
o
t
s
t
o
r
a
g
e
l
e
n
g
t
h
a
n
d
a
n
ea
s
t
b
o
u
n
d
l
e
f
t
t
u
r
n
l
a
n
e
f
o
r
3
0
0
-
f
o
o
t
s
t
o
r
a
g
e
l
e
n
g
t
h
.
P
r
o
v
i
d
e
p
r
o
t
e
c
t
e
d
l
e
f
t
t
u
r
n
ph
a
s
e
f
o
r
e
a
s
t
b
o
u
n
d
a
n
d
w
e
s
t
b
o
u
n
d
m
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
.
$3
,
2
6
5
,
5
0
0
14
22
0
t
h
S
t
r
e
e
t
S
W
/
S
R
9
9
W
i
d
e
n
2
2
0
t
h
t
o
a
d
d
w
e
s
t
b
o
u
n
d
r
i
g
h
t
t
u
r
n
l
a
n
e
f
o
r
3
2
5
-
f
o
o
t
s
t
o
r
a
g
e
l
e
n
g
t
h
.
W
i
d
e
n
S
R
99
a
d
d
s
e
c
o
n
d
s
o
u
t
h
b
o
u
n
d
l
e
f
t
t
u
r
n
l
a
n
e
f
o
r
2
7
5
-
f
o
o
t
s
t
o
r
a
g
e
l
e
n
g
t
h
.
$3
,
1
4
7
,
3
0
0
Su
b
T
o
t
a
l
$
7
,
1
3
7
,
0
0
0
Hi
g
h
w
a
y
o
f
S
t
a
t
e
w
i
d
e
S
i
g
n
i
f
i
c
a
n
c
e
(
H
S
S
)
O
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
20
23
8
t
h
S
t
r
e
e
t
S
W
/
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
W
a
y
(
S
R
10
4
)
In
s
t
a
l
l
a
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
s
i
g
n
a
l
a
n
d
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
p
r
o
t
e
c
t
e
d
l
e
f
t
t
u
r
n
p
h
a
s
e
f
o
r
n
o
r
t
h
b
o
u
n
d
a
n
d
so
u
t
h
b
o
u
n
d
m
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
.
C
o
s
t
a
s
s
u
m
e
s
c
o
r
r
e
c
t
i
o
n
o
f
m
i
n
o
r
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
k
e
w
.
$5
,
4
4
4
,
6
0
0
21
24
4
t
h
S
t
r
e
e
t
S
W
(
S
R
1
0
4
)
/
7
6
t
h
A
v
e
n
u
e
W
W
i
d
e
n
2
4
4
t
h
t
o
a
d
d
s
e
c
o
n
d
w
e
s
t
b
o
u
n
d
l
e
f
t
t
u
r
n
l
a
n
e
f
o
r
3
2
5
-
f
o
o
t
s
t
o
r
a
g
e
l
e
n
g
t
h
.
Pr
o
v
i
d
e
r
i
g
h
t
t
u
r
n
p
h
a
s
e
f
o
r
n
o
r
t
h
b
o
u
n
d
m
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
d
u
r
i
n
g
w
e
s
t
b
o
u
n
d
l
e
f
t
t
u
r
n
ph
a
s
e
.
$3
,
3
2
1
,
6
0
0
Su
b
T
o
t
a
l
$
8
,
7
6
6
,
2
0
0
Sa
f
e
t
y
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
25
22
8
t
h
S
t
r
e
e
t
S
W
,
S
R
9
9
-
7
6
t
h
A
v
e
n
u
e
W
Co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
o
n
o
f
2
2
8
t
h
S
t
r
e
e
t
S
W
b
e
t
w
ee
n
S
R
9
9
a
n
d
7
6
t
h
A
v
e
n
u
e
W
(
t
h
r
e
e
la
n
e
s
w
i
t
h
c
u
r
b
,
g
u
t
t
e
r
,
a
n
d
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
)
.
I
n
s
t
a
l
l
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
s
i
g
n
a
l
a
t
2
2
8
t
h
S
t
r
e
e
t
S
W
a
n
d
SR
9
9
.
I
n
s
t
a
l
l
m
e
d
i
a
n
o
n
S
R
9
9
t
o
p
r
o
h
i
b
i
t
l
e
f
t
t
u
r
n
m
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
t
7
6
t
h
A
v
e
n
u
e
W
.
$3
,
9
4
8
,
2
0
0
26
21
6
t
h
S
t
r
e
e
t
/
S
R
9
9
Wi
d
e
n
t
o
a
l
l
o
w
o
n
e
l
e
f
t
t
u
r
n
l
a
n
e
a
n
d
o
n
e
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
l
a
n
e
s
i
n
e
a
s
t
b
o
u
n
d
a
n
d
we
s
t
b
o
u
n
d
d
i
r
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
,
w
i
t
h
1
0
0
-
f
o
o
t
s
t
o
r
a
g
e
l
e
n
g
t
h
f
o
r
t
u
r
n
l
a
n
e
s
.
$7
1
9
,
8
0
0
27
23
8
t
h
S
t
r
e
e
t
S
W
,
S
R
1
0
4
-
8
4
t
h
A
v
e
n
u
e
W
Wi
d
e
n
t
o
t
h
r
e
e
l
a
n
e
s
w
i
t
h
c
u
r
b
,
g
u
t
t
e
r
,
a
n
d
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
(
a
s
p
e
r
P
i
n
e
S
t
r
e
e
t
F
e
r
r
y
Ac
c
e
s
s
S
t
u
d
y
)
$2
,
5
1
9
,
7
0
0
28
84
t
h
A
v
e
n
u
e
W
,
2
1
2
t
h
S
t
r
e
e
t
S
W
-
2
3
8
t
h
St
r
e
e
t
S
W
Wi
d
e
n
t
o
t
h
r
e
e
l
a
n
e
s
w
i
t
h
c
u
r
b
,
g
u
t
t
e
r
,
a
n
d
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
.
$1
6
,
3
5
5
,
5
0
0
SR
9
9
I
l
l
u
m
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
r
o
a
d
w
a
y
s
a
f
e
t
y
w
i
t
h
i
l
l
u
m
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
$4
0
0
,
0
0
0
Ma
i
n
S
t
/
3
r
d
A
v
e
s
i
g
n
a
l
u
p
g
r
a
d
e
U
p
g
r
a
d
e
s
i
g
n
a
l
t
o
r
e
d
u
c
e
c
o
n
f
l
i
c
t
s
w
i
t
h
t
r
u
c
k
s
$1
3
8
,
0
0
0
Packet Page 820 of 930
Co
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
–
P
u
b
l
i
c
R
e
v
i
e
w
D
r
a
f
t
Ci
t
y
o
f
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
ID
L
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
Co
s
t
Su
b
T
o
t
a
l
$
2
4
,
0
8
1
,
2
0
0
No
n
-
M
o
t
o
r
i
z
e
d
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
In
t
e
r
u
r
b
a
n
T
r
a
i
l
$1
,
5
3
5
,
0
0
0
Ci
t
y
w
i
d
e
W
a
l
k
w
a
y
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
$1
4
,
6
9
9
,
0
0
0
AD
A
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
$4
,
1
8
9
,
5
0
0
Ci
t
y
w
i
d
e
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
L
i
g
h
t
i
n
g
$8
0
,
0
0
0
Bi
k
e
R
o
u
t
e
S
i
g
n
i
n
g
$2
5
,
0
0
0
Ci
t
y
w
i
d
e
B
i
k
e
w
a
y
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
$1
2
0
,
0
0
0
Su
b
T
o
t
a
l
$
2
0
,
6
4
8
,
5
0
0
Pr
e
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
M
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
a
n
d
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
An
n
u
a
l
S
t
r
e
e
t
O
v
e
r
l
a
y
s
20
1
0
-
2
0
1
5
G
r
i
n
d
p
a
v
e
m
e
n
t
,
o
v
e
r
l
a
y
$1
0
,
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
20
1
6
-
2
0
2
5
$1
7
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
Ci
t
y
w
i
d
e
S
t
r
e
e
t
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
20
1
0
-
2
0
1
5
M
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
t
o
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
r
o
a
d
w
a
y
l
i
f
e
$9
0
,
0
0
0
20
1
6
-
2
0
2
5
$1
5
0
,
0
0
0
Ci
t
y
w
i
d
e
S
i
g
n
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
20
1
0
-
2
0
1
5
U
p
g
r
a
d
e
s
t
o
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
s
i
g
n
a
l
s
,
f
o
r
m
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
a
n
d
t
e
c
h
n
o
l
o
g
y
$3
0
,
0
0
0
20
1
6
-
2
0
2
5
$5
0
,
0
0
0
Ci
t
y
w
i
d
e
C
a
b
i
n
e
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
t
r
o
l
l
e
r
Up
g
r
a
d
e
s
20
1
0
-
2
0
1
5
U
p
g
r
a
d
e
s
t
o
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
s
i
g
n
a
l
c
a
b
i
n
e
t
s
e
l
e
m
e
n
t
s
f
o
r
m
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
a
n
d
te
c
h
n
o
l
o
g
y
$3
0
,
0
0
0
20
1
6
-
2
0
2
5
$5
0
,
0
0
0
Pu
g
e
t
&
O
l
y
m
p
i
c
V
i
e
w
D
r
i
v
e
S
i
g
n
a
l
r
e
b
u
i
l
d
$1
9
8
,
0
0
0
Do
w
n
t
o
w
n
B
i
c
y
c
l
e
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
Ad
d
b
i
c
y
c
l
e
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
a
t
d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
t
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
c
i
t
y
w
i
d
e
$6
0
,
0
0
0
23
8
t
h
/
1
0
0
t
h
A
v
e
S
i
g
n
a
l
U
p
g
r
a
d
e
s
R
e
b
u
i
l
d
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
s
i
g
n
a
l
s
y
s
t
e
m
a
n
d
i
n
s
t
a
l
l
v
i
d
e
o
d
e
t
e
c
t
i
o
n
$1
1
8
,
0
0
0
Packet Page 821 of 930
Im
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
F
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
P
l
a
n
Ju
n
e
4
,
2
0
0
9
ID
L
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
Co
s
t
Su
b
T
o
t
a
l
$
2
7
,
9
7
6
,
0
0
0
Ot
h
e
r
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
Ci
t
y
w
i
d
e
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
C
a
l
m
i
n
g
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
$1
6
0
,
0
0
0
Op
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
E
n
h
a
n
c
e
m
e
n
t
s
$2
4
0
,
0
0
0
Fu
t
u
r
e
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
U
p
d
a
t
e
s
$6
0
0
,
0
0
0
De
b
t
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
o
n
2
2
0
t
h
S
t
r
e
e
t
S
W
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
$6
1
6
,
6
0
0
4t
h
A
v
e
n
u
e
C
o
r
r
i
d
o
r
E
n
h
a
n
c
e
m
e
n
t
$5
,
5
0
0
,
0
0
0
Sh
e
l
l
V
a
l
l
e
y
A
c
c
e
s
s
R
o
a
d
$5
3
0
,
0
0
0
Mi
n
i
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
$3
,
0
0
0
Su
b
T
o
t
a
l
$
7
,
6
4
9
,
6
0
0
GR
A
N
D
T
O
T
A
L
,
2
0
1
0
-
2
0
2
5
$
1
0
5
,
2
1
3
,
3
0
0
Packet Page 822 of 930
Comprehensive Transportation Plan – Public Review Draft
City of Edmonds 6-6
Revenue Sources
Current Sources of Revenue
Revenue sources available to the City for financing the transportation improvements are listed
below.
Grants – State and federal grants may be obtained through a competitive application process.
Grant sources include the following:
-FHWA – The federal government has funds that are made available to the State of
Washington and local agencies from federal gas taxes. The allocations are based on the
competitive evaluation of specific projects against other projects within the State and
region. To be eligible for funding, a project must be located on a route designated as
arterial or collector in the federal classification (see Figures 3-2 and 3-3). Grant programs
include Congestion Mitigation Air Quality, Intersection and Corridor Safety, Surface
Transportation Program (STP) Regional, Transportation Enhancement Program
(statewide), and direct allocations.
-Federal Department of Housing and Urban Development – Federal funds are distributed as
Community Development Block Grants through Snohomish County. Grants are
competitive based on the merits of the projects and are targeted to benefit low income
areas. Typically, a project must be located in a census tract or block with a majority of
residents with low to moderate income. Through the grant amounts are relatively small
they can be used on local streets in residential areas for sidewalk and sidewalk ramp
construction.
-Transportation Improvement Board (TIB) – The Transportation Improvement Board
provides grants using the State’s portion of the gas tax. Projects are selected on a
competitive basis and programs vary from sidewalks to corridor improvements. To be
eligible a project must be located on an arterial or collector. The TIB is an independent
state agency that distributes grant funding, which comes from the revenue generated by
three cents of the statewide gas tax, to cities and counties for funding transportation
projects. The TIB provides funding to its urban customers through three state-funded
grant programs:
Urban Arterial Program (UAP) – best suited for roadway projects that improve safety
and mobility.
Urban Corridor Program (UCP) – best suited for roadway projects with multiple
funding partners that expand capacity.
Sidewalk Program (SP) – best suited for sidewalk projects that improve safety and
connectivity.
Packet Page 823 of 930
Implementation and Financial Plan
June 4, 2009 6-7
Traffic Impact / Mitigation Fees – Impact fees were recently instituted within the City and
are paid by developers to mitigate the impacts on the transportation system.
Real Estate Excise Tax –This is a tax on all sales of real estate, measured by the full
selling price, including the amount of any liens, mortgages and other debts given to secure the
purchase at a rate of 1.28 percent. The City is eligible to receive proceeds from the tax if they
have planned under the Growth Management Act. The funds must be used for capital
improvements. The State and Counties receive 0.78 percent and the City 0.5 percent.
Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax – The motor vehicle fuel tax is collected by the State and 2.4 cents
per gallon are distributed to cities for roadway construction purposes. The money is
distributed based on the population of each city.
General Fund – The General Fund includes a broad range of taxes and fees such as sales tax
and building permit fees. These revenue sources may be used for all City activities.
Joint Agency Funding – Edmonds adjoins unincorporated Snohomish County and several
other cities. When projects are located in two more jurisdictions, resources are combined to
fund them.
General Obligation Bonds – These are bonds issued by the City that are financed through
future anticipated tax revenues.
Parks Funding – Funding provided through the City Parks Department, to be used jointly
with transportation funding for pedestrian and bicycle projects.
Table 6-2 summarizes potential revenue projected through 2025, based upon current sources and
funding history.
Table 6-2. Potential Revenue
Source Amount
Grants (unsecured) $12,080,650
Traffic Impact / Mitigation Fees 6,549,165
Real Estate Excise Tax 4,000,000
Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax 2,000,000
Transfers from Other Funds 2,062,650
Utility Resurfacing 1,795,488
Joint Agency1 8,000,000
Interest Income 511,331
Development Sidewalks 23,021
Parks Funding – Interurban Trail 1,326,000
Parks Funding - 4th Ave Enhancement 2,365,000
Miscellaneous 193,306
TOTAL $40,906,611
1. Assumes joint funding with Snohomish County for the recommended 84th Avenue improvement.
Packet Page 824 of 930
Comprehensive Transportation Plan – Public Review Draft
City of Edmonds 6-8
Based upon the total costs of recommended projects summarized in Table 6-1, and the potential
revenue based upon current sources and funding history, the estimated total revenue shortfall
through 2025 is $64,306,689.
Other Potential Financing Options
The City will continue to explore new options to fund transportation projects and programs that
are important to citizens. Options that could be considered include the following:
Transportation Benefit District – A Transportation Benefit District (TBD) can fund any
transportation improvement contained in any existing state or regional transportation plan that
is necessitated by existing or reasonably foreseeable congestion levels. The legislative
authority of a city to create a TBD by ordinance is set forth in RCW 36.73. Projects covered
by a TBD can include maintenance and improvements to city streets, county roads, state
highways, investments in high capacity transportation, public transportation, transportation
demand management and other transportation projects identified in a regional transportation
planning organization plan or state plan. A variety of revenue options are available. An
annual vehicle license fee of up to $20 per license can be passed by the City of Edmonds
TBD, and is not subject to voter approval. The legislation also allows a TBD the ability to
collect additional annual vehicle license fees up to a total of $100 per license per year in
addition to sales and property taxes, subject to voter approval.
The City has already enacted the $20 per year vehicle license fee, which is slated to fund City
Street Operations only. Additional TBD funding above the amount of the TBD in Edmonds
would be subject to voter approval.
If additional TBD funding were implemented, the City would work with PSRC to incorporate
projects into the regional transportation so that they would be eligible for funding. The
regional and state plans have already identified a broad range of local transportation
improvements as priorities, and the multi-modal mobility and safety projects presented in this
Transportation Plan are consistent with those priorities.
Business License Fee for Transportation – Cities have the option of including a fee to
fund transportation projects, as part of business license fees. This is typically an annual fee
that is charged per full time equivalent (FTE) employee. In order for this type of fee to be
successful, cities typically collaborate very closely with business owners, to identify projects
and programs for funding that would be of most benefit to local businesses.
Local Improvement District/Roadway Improvement District –LIDs, enabled under
RCW 35.43, are a means of assisting benefitting properties in financing needed capital
improvements. A special type of LID is a Roadway Improvement District (RID). LIDs may
be applied to water, sewer and storm sewer facilities, as well as roads; but RIDs may only be
applied to street improvements. LIDs and RIDs are special assessment districts in which
improvements will specially benefit primarily the property owners in the district. They are
created under the sponsorship of a municipal government and are not self governing special
Packet Page 825 of 930
Implementation and Financial Plan
June 4, 2009 6-9
purpose districts. To the extent and in the manner noted in the enabling statutes, they must be
approved by both the local government and benefited property owners.
Additional Grants – Revenue projections summarized in Table 6-2 assume that the City
will be able obtain future grant funding at levels consistent with what has been obtained
historically. It may be possible for the City to obtain higher levels of grant funding than what
has been historically obtained. However, state and federal grants are obtained through a
highly competitive process, and other municipalities are also likely to increase their requests
for grant funding to address their own revenue shortfalls, so it is likely that only a small
portion of the City’s revenue shortfall could be covered through additional grant funding.
Table 6-3 summarizes potential levels of revenue that could be obtained by these additional
sources, if they were approved by the City Council and by citizens. The table shows that the
transportation funding shortfall could be covered by a combination of these optional revenue
sources.
Table 6-3. Potential Revenue from Additional Optional Sources
Source Amount
TBD license fee at $80 per license per year1 $ 46,592,000
Business license fee for transportation at $92.27 per employee per year2 17,715,840
Local Improvement District / Roadway Improvement District3 ------
Additional grants4 ------
$65,307,840
1. Assumes 36,000 vehicles (40,000 population x 0.91 vehicles per capita) for 16 years. The total amount shown is that portion above the $20
portion that has already been passed and committed to other
2. Assumes 12,000 employees for 16 years.
3. Enacted to pay for specific projects with the district that is defined. Any funding obtained through an LID or RID would lower the fees needed from
the other optional sources.
4. Obtained through application process for specific projects. Any funding obtained through additional grants would lower the fees needed from the
other optional sources
Project Prioritization
Program Priority
Although all projects and programs presented in this Transportation Plan are important to the
City, they can only be implemented as funding becomes available. Guided by feedback from
citizens, and also by state laws, the following priority order has been established.
1. Maintenance and Preservation – The City is committed to maintaining existing transportation
facilities in which substantial public investment have been made, and which are critical to
maintaining transportation mobility and safety. This has also been identified as the top
priority by citizens.
Packet Page 826 of 930
Comprehensive Transportation Plan – Public Review Draft
City of Edmonds 6-10
2. Safety Improvements on City Streets – Road safety projects are also identified as a high
priority by citizens. Some concurrency projects also address safety issues; however,
additional safety projects will be a high priority if additional funding is obtained from
alternative sources.
3. Concurrency – GMA requires that projects needed to maintain concurrency must be in place
within six years of the time that they are triggered by development. If concurrency projects
are not implemented, new development that those projects would support cannot be
approved. Thus, concurrency projects must be implemented to support planned land use
identified in the Comprehensive Plan.
4. Walkway Connections – Completion of walkway connections is consistent with the City’s
policies to support a strong pedestrian network, and has also been identified as a high priority
by citizens. Completing walkway connections will be a high priority if additional funding is
obtained from alternative sources.
5. Curb Ramp Upgrades – ADA requires that the City have a program in place to retrofit curb
ramps that do not meet ADA standards. The City will continue to implement curb ramp
upgrades in conjunction with street construction and maintenance projects, but completion of
the Curb Ramp Upgrade Program by 2025 will require additional funding over current
projections.
6. Bicycle Route Signing and Facility Upgrade – The City will continue to incorporate bikeways
into street improvement and maintenance projects where feasible, whether they consist of
separate bicycle lanes, or marking for shared bicycle/vehicle lanes. However, completion of
the Bike Plan, including signing and provision of bicycle parking, will require additional
funding over current projections.
7. Improvements on SR 104 (Edmonds Way) – Operational deficiencies have been projected for
SR 104. As a Highway of Statewide significance, this road is not subject to local concurrency
rules. The City will continue to coordinate with WSDOT to address problems as they are
identified, but will not be able to fund improvements on this road unless additional sources of
funds over current projections are obtained.
8. Traffic Calming Program – The City will continue to address neighborhood traffic safety
issues on a case by case basis as they are identified; however, implementation of the full
Traffic Calming Program will require additional funding over current projections to be
obtained.
Implementation Plan
Transportation Improvement Plan 2010-2025
The Comprehensive Transportation Plan serves to guide the development of surface
transportation within the City, based upon evaluation of existing conditions, projection and
Packet Page 827 of 930
Implementation and Financial Plan
June 4, 2009 6-11
evaluation of future conditions that result from the City’s adopted future land use plan, and
priorities stated by Edmonds citizens.
Table 6-4 summarizes the recommended Transportation Improvement Plan, 2010 through 2025,
which is a comprehensive multimodal plan that is based on extensive public input and reflects a
major update of the 2003 Plan.
Table 6-4. Transportation Improvement Plan 2010–2025
Project 2010 - 2015 2016 - 2025 Total
Annual Street Overlays $ 10,200,000 $ 17,000,000 $ 27,200,000
Citywide Street Improvements 90,000 150,000 240,000
Citywide Signal Improvements 30,000 50,000 80,000
Citywide Cabinet and Controller Upgrades 30,000 50,000 80,000
Puget & Olympic View Drive 198,000 198,000
Downtown Bicycle Parking 22,500 37,500 60,000
238th / 100th Ave Signal Upgrades 118,000 118,000
Puget Drive / 196th St SW / 88th Avenue W 879,000 879,000
Main Street / 9th Avenue N 874,400 874,400
Walnut Street / 9th Avenue S 874,400 874,400
212th Street SW / 84th Avenue W 1,910,100 1,910,100
Caspers Street / 9th Avenue N 818,000 818,000
212th Street SW / 76th Avenue W 2,313,800 2,313,800
Olympic View Drive / 76th Avenue W 1,146,800 1,146,800
220th Street SW / SR 99 3,147,300 3,147,300
220th Street SW / 76th Avenue W 138,300 138,300
228th Street SW, SR99 - 76th Avenue W 3,948,200 3,948,200
84th Avenue W, 212th Street SW - 238th Street SW 16,355,500 16,355,500
SR 99 Illumination 400,000 400,000
Main St / 3rd Ave signal upgrade 138,000 138,000
Shell Valley Access Road 530,000 530,000
212th Street SW / SR 99 3,265,500 3,265,500
216th Street / SR 99 719,800 719,800
174th Street SW / Olympic View Drive 724,200 724,200
238th Street SW / Edmonds Way (SR 104) 5,444,600 5,444,600
238th Street SW, SR104 - 84th Avenue W 2,519,700 2,519,700
244th Street SW (SR 104) / 76th Avenue W 3,321,600 3,321,600
Packet Page 828 of 930
Comprehensive Transportation Plan – Public Review Draft
City of Edmonds 6-12
Project 2010 - 2015 2016 - 2025 Total
Interurban Trail 1,535,000 1,535,000
Citywide Walkway Projects 5,512,125 9,186,875 14,699,000
ADA Transition Plan 1,571,063 2,618,438 4,189,500
Citywide Pedestrian Lighting 30,000 50,000 80,000
Bike Route Signing 25,000 25,000
Citywide Bikeway Projects 45,000 75,000 120,000
Citywide Traffic Calming Program 60,000 100,000 160,000
Operational Enhancements 90,000 150,000 240,000
Future Transportation Plan Updates 225,000 375,000 600,000
Debt Service on 220th Street SW Project 231,225 385,375 616,600
4th Avenue Corridor Enhancement 5,500,000 5,500,000
Mini Transportation Management Center 3,000 3,000
TOTAL $33,456,912 $71,756,388 $105,213,300
Projected Revenue $15,339,979 $25,566,632 $40,906,611
Shortfall, unless alternative funding identified 18,116,933 46,189,756 $64,306,689
Interjurisdictional Coordination
The City will coordinate with the following agencies to implement projects and strategies
presented in this Transportation Plan:
Revise the federal functional classification of some city streets to be consistent with the
City’s adopted functional classifications (see Table 3-2).
Coordinate with WSDOT on projects to address future operational deficiencies on SR 104.
Coordinate with Snohomish County for joint agency funding of the proposed 84th Avenue
improvement.
If a higher funding level of TBD is put forward and approved by voters, coordinate with
PSRC to include projects in the regional transportation plan so that they will be eligible for
funding.
Coordinate with WSDOT and the FHWA to move forward with the Edmonds Crossing
Multimodal Project.
Coordinate with Community Transit to implement transit investments that are consistent with
the City’s priorities; including construction of additional bus shelters and benches, and new
transit routes.
Packet Page 829 of 930
Implementation and Financial Plan
June 4, 2009 6-13
Contingency Plan in Case of Revenue Shortfall
Some revenue sources are very secure and highly reliable. However, other revenue sources are
volatile, and therefore difficult to predict with confidence. To cover the shortfall identified in the
previous section, or in the event that revenue from one or more of these sources is not
forthcoming in the amounts forecasted in this Transportation Plan, the City has several options:
Change the LOS standard, and therefore reduce the need for road capacity improvement
projects.
Increase the amount of revenue from existing sources.
Find new sources of revenue which could include additional federal and state grants,
additional TBD funding, business license fee for transportation, and/or LID/RIDs.
Require developers to provide such facilities at their own expense.
Change the Land Use Element in the Comprehensive Plan to reduce the amount of
development, and thus reduce the need for additional public facilities; or to further
concentrate growth along higher capacity roads that are served by transit.
Packet Page 830 of 930
Packet Page 831 of 930
June 4, 2009 7-1
Chapter 7. References
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). 1999. Guide
for the Development of Bicycle Facilities.
Association of Washington Cities. 2002. Tax & User Fee Survey, Part II Land Use Fees.
Association of Washington Cities. 2007. Transportation Benefit District Fact Sheet. September.
http://www.awcnet.org/documents/TBDFactSheet0907.pdf
CH2M Hill. 2001. Edmonds Crossing: Pine Street Ferry Traffic Study. Prepared for the City of
Edmonds. October 10.
Community Transit. 2009. System Performance Report Year 2008. Produced by Research and
Statistics Section, Strategic Planning and Grants Division.
Ewing, Reid. 1999. Traffic Calming: State of the Practice. Report No. FHWA-RD-99-135.
Prepared by the Institute of Transportation Engineers for the US Department of
Transportation and the Federal Highway Administration. 1999.
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). 1989. Highway Functional Classification: Concepts,
Criteria and Procedures. http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/planning/fcsec1_1.htm
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). 2000. Roundabouts: An informational Guide.
Publication No. FHWA-RD-00-067. June.
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). 2001. Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices
(MUTCD). US Department of Transportation. Publication No. MUTCD-1.
Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE). Traffic Engineering Handbook. 5th Edition, James L. Pline,
editor. Publication No. TB-010A. Washington, DC. 1999.
JHK and Associates. City of Edmonds Bikeway and Walkway Plan. June 4, 1992.
Packet Page 832 of 930
Comprehensive Transportation Plan – Public Review Draft
City of Edmonds 7-2
Municipal Research and Services Center (MRSC) of Washington. 2003. Washington State Local
Improvement District Manual. Fifth Edition. Report No. 52. Prepared with the American
Public Works Association, Washington chapter. October.
Parsons Brinkerhoff. Washington State Ferry (WSF) 1999 Travel Survey: Edmonds – Kingston
Route. 1999.
Pedestrian and Bicycle Information Center. How are "Sharrows" or shared-lane markings used to
improve bicyclist safety? Accessed May4, 2009.
http://www.bicyclinginfo.org/faqs/answer.cfm?id=972
Perteet. 2007. SR 99 Traffic and Circulation Study. Prepared for the City of Edmonds.
November.
Puget Sound Regional Council, 2009. PSRC Transportation 2040 Working Group. May.
http://www.psrc.org/boards/advisory/T2040working_group.htm
Snohomish County. General Policy Plan – Transportation Element. 2000.
Sound Transit. Sound Move – The 10-Year Regional Transit System Plan. Adopted May 31,
1996. http://www.soundtransit.org/stnews/publications/soundmove/pubsSMTOC.htm
State of Washington. Growth Management Act. RCW 36.70A. 1990.
The Transpo Group. Report to City of Edmonds on State “Level of Service Bill” Impact on the
City’s Comprehensive Plan. August 2001.
Transportation Research Board. Highway Capacity Manual. Special Report 209. National
Research Council. Washington, DC. (1997 and 2000 updates).
Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT). 2007. Washington State Highway
System Plan: 2007 – 2026. Olympia, WA. Prepared by the WSDOT Planning Office.
December 2007.
Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT). 2008. Local Agency Guidelines
Manual. Prepared by the Highways and Local Programs Division. October.
Washington State Transportation Commission (WSTC). 2006. Transportation Commission List
of Highways of Statewide Significance. Passed by Resolution 660. June 7.
http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/NR/rdonlyres/6C953258-50A4-419E-AD79-
BDE4EF775845/0/HSSlist2008.pdf
Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT). 2008. Collision Data (1/1/2005 –
12/31/2007) within the City of Edmonds. Collected and compiled by the WSDOT
Collision Data and Analysis Branch.
Packet Page 833 of 930
Implementation and Financial Plan
June 4, 2009 7-3
Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT). 2009. Design Manual. Publication
Number M 22-01. Prepared by the Design Office, Engineering and Regional Operations
Division. January. http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/Publications/Manuals/M22-01.htm
Washington State Transportation Commission (WSTC). 1998. Transportation Commission List
of Highways of Statewide Significance. Passed by Resolution #584. December.
http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/ppsc/hsp/HSSLIST.pdf
Packet Page 834 of 930
Packet Page 835 of 930
Appendix A
Public Participation Materials
Packet Page 836 of 930
Packet Page 837 of 930
Page1
TransportationPlanUpdate–OpenHouse#2
ProjectPriorityQuestionnaire
Fromthelistbelow,pleaseidentify fiveprojecttypesthatyoufeelshouldhavehighestfunding
priority.Ofthefiveprojecttypesyouchoose,pleaserankthem1through5,with1ashighestpriority
and5aslowest.Pleaseassignonlyonerankedvalue perprojecttype,andchoosenomorethanfive .
Top5
FundingPriority
(Rank1through5)
ProjectType
BicycleRouteSigning
Providesigningforbicyclerouteswithinthecity.
CapacityImprovementsonCityStreets
Addlanesorimprovetraffic controlatco ngestedintersections.
Capacity/SafetyImprovementsonSR104(EdmondsWay)
Improvevehiclechannelizationand/ortraffic controlatcongestedintersections–
requiresclosecoordinationwiththeWashingtonStateDepartmentofTransportation.
CurbRampUpgrades
Buildorrebuildcurbrampsso thatintersectioncro ssingsmeetthere quirementsofthe
AmericanswithDisabilitiesAct.
MultimodalFacilityEdmondsCrossingProject
Constructnewmultimodalfacilityatferryterminal,connectingferry,automobile,
transit,bicycle,andpedes triantrafficindowntownEdmonds.
PavementMaintenance
Provideimprovementstomaintainpav ementoncitystreets,suchasasphaltoverlays
andfillingofpotholes.
SafetyImprovementsonCityStreets
Addlanesorimprovetrafficcontrolat locationswheresafetyissueshavebeen
identified.
SpotImprovementsonCityStreets
Providelowercostimprovements suchassignaltimingupgr adesorlocalizedstreet
improvementstoimprovevehicle safetyandmobility.
SpotImprovementsforWalkwaysandBikeways
Providelowercostimprovementssuchaspedest rianlightingand bicycleparkingto
improvenonmotorizedsafetyandmobility.
TrafficCalmingProgram
Implementmeasurestoslowdowntrafficand /ordiscouragecutthroughtrafficin
neighborhoods,attheneighborhoodresidents’request.
Transit–BusShelters
Provideadditionalbussheltersand/orimprovementsatexistingshelters–requires
closecoordinationwithCommunityTransit.
WalkwayConnections
Constructnewwalkwaysandwalkwayconnections.
Packet Page 838 of 930
Page2
Arethereanyspecificprojects presentedatthisopenhousethatshouldbeofhighestpriorityfor
funding?
Arethereanyspecificprojects presentedatthisopenhousethatshouldnotbeimplemented?
Arethereanyspecificprojectsorprojecttypesthat shouldbefunded,butarenotonthislist?
Anyothercommentsorsuggestions?
Name(optional) Address(optional)
Phone(optional)Email(optional)
Pleasedropthisforminthecommentboxormailyourcommentsby Friday,March20,2009 to:
BertrandHauss,CityofEdmonds
1215thAvenueNorth
Edmonds,WA98020
Phone:(425)7710220
Fax:(425)6725750
Thankyouforyourparticipation!
Packet Page 839 of 930
City of Edmonds Comprehensive Transportation Plan Update
Welcome
Please sign in here.
Meeting Objectives
Review Draft Transportation Plan
Potential projects and programs
Costs and revenue projections
Provide input on project priorities for Transportation Plan
Review and comment on preliminary design of
SR-99 / W 76th Avenue Intersection Improvement
Meeting Agenda
5:00–5:30 p.m. Sign in.
5:30–5:45 p.m. Presentation
5:45–6:30 p.m. Visit stations, talk to project team members
Provide comments
6:30–6:45 p.m. Presentation
6:45–7:30 p.m. Visit stations, talk to project team members
Provide comments
7:30 p.m. End of meeting
Packet Page 840 of 930
LOS Characteristic Traffi c Flow
Average Delay
(seconds per vehicle)
Signalized Stop Controlled
A
Free fl ow, little or no restriction on
speed or maneuverability caused by the
presence of other vehicles.
≤ 10 ≤ 10
B Stable fl ow, operating speed is beginning
to be restricted by other traffi c.> 10–20 > 10–15
C
Stable fl ow, volume and density levels
are beginning to restrict drivers in their
maneuverability.
> 20–35 > 15–25
D Stable fl ow, speeds and maneuverability
closely controlled due to higher volumes.> 35–55 > 25–35
E Approaching unstable fl ow, low speeds,
freedom to maneuver is diffi cult.> 55–80 > 35–50
F Forced traffi c fl ow, very low speeds, long
delays with stop-and-go traffi c.> 80 > 50
City of Edmonds Comprehensive Transportation Plan Update
Intersection Operation at 212th Street SW and 76th Avenue W
Level of Service
(LOS) measures
the operating
quality of a road.
LO S is graded
A (free fl ow)
through
F (grid lock).
F Average Delay
138 seconds/vehicle
Average Delay
166 seconds/vehicle
F
Average Delay
94 seconds/vehicle
F
Average Delay
131 seconds/vehicle
F
2025
WITHOUT
IMPROVEMENTS
Average intersection LOS = F
Average intersection delay =
136 seconds/vehicle Average Delay
53 seconds/vehicle
Average Delay
61 seconds/vehicle
Average Delay
58 seconds/vehicle
D
E
E
Average Delay
37 seconds/vehicle
D
2025
WITH
IMPROVEMENTS
Average intersection LOS = D
Average intersection delay =
54 seconds/vehicle
212th Street SW
76
th
Av
e
n
u
e
W
212th Street SW
76
th
Av
e
n
u
e
W
Note: Operations are similar at 212th Street SW/State Route 99 and 220th Street SW/76th Avenue W.
Level of Service
Packet Page 841 of 930
City of Edmonds Comprehensive Transportation Plan Update
Level of Service
with and without Improvements
Snohomish County
King County
Snohomish County
King County
Main St
76
t
h
Av
e
W
75
t h P
lW
208th St SW
9 5t
h
Pl
W
212th St SW
220th St
S
W
68
t
h
A ve
W
Dayton St
7t
h
A
e
N
10
0
t
h
A
v
e
W
76
t
h
A
v
e
W
O lym
p ic
V
iew
D
r
238th St SW
176th St SW
Bowdoin
W
a
y
180th St SW
Walnut St
3r
d
A
v
e
S
244th
S
t S W
5t
h
A
v
e
S
236th St SW
3rd
A
v
e
N
8 4 th
A
ve
W
9t
h
A
v
e
S
238th
S
t
SW
200th St SWCaspers St
7 6 t h
A
v e
W
Puget Dr
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
W
y
Ma
p
l e wo
o
dD
r
228th StSW
9t
h
A
v
e
N
5 2 n d
Av
eW
Meado
w
d
a
l
e
B
e
a
c
h
R
o
a
d
O l y m p ic V i ew
D
r
8 0t
h
A
v
e
W
8 8t
h
Av
e
W
196th St SW
Su
n
s
e
t
A
v
e
104
99
524
O l y m p i c V i e w
D r
Level of Service (LOS) Key
meets LOS standard
exceeds LOS standard
not subject to LOS standard
no improvements recommended
LOS Standards
City arterials = LOS D
State Route 99 = LOS E
C DF
D
D F F
BB
D D D
D F F
BB
F F F
BA
C E F
BA
B B B
A A A D F F
BB
E F F
BB
D F F
BB
E F F
AA
B B B
D F F
BB
D E F
E
D F F
BB
F F F
BB
B B B
C D D
D F F
BB
D F F
DD
D F F
BB
D E F
EDFF
BB
D E E
DC
A A B
B C C
B C C
D F F
BB
F F F
BB
D D E
D F F
B
D E F
D
00.51
Miles
without
improvements
with
improvementsB
2015 2025
B
without
improvements
existing
FFD
Packet Page 842 of 930
0 0.5 1
Miles
yyy
ymismish Countysh CountmisSnohomnohommishthuyyuuuuooohoohosh Countsh CountSSh Counh CounhhhhhhiiiiiimmmmmmnohomnohomoSnohoiiSSnohommmmmiiiissshhhhhCouuntttty
yyyyioountytyyyyutKing CouKingguuuuuuuuooooCoCo ttttnnnnnnKinKinooKiiKingCooooouuuuunnnttttyyyyyyyytyyyyy
Main St
76
th
A
v
eW
75
t
h
P l
W
208th St SW
9 5 th
P l
W
212th St SW
220th St S W
6 8 t hA
v
e
W
Dayton St
7t
h
A
e
N
10
0
t
h
A
v
e
W
76
t
h
A
ve
W
Oly
m
p
i
c Vi
e
w
Dr
238th St S W
176th St SW
Bowdoin Way
180th StSW
Walnut St
3r
d
A
v
e
S
244th St SW
5t
h
A
v
e
S
236th St SW
3 rd
A
v
eN
8 4 t hA
v
eW
9t
h
A
v
e
S
238th St
S
W
200th St SWCaspersSt
7 6t
hA
v
e
W
Puget Dr
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
W
y
Ma
p l ew
o
o d D
r
228th St SW
9t
h
A
v
e
N
Meado
w
d
a
l
e
B
e
a
c
h
R
o
a
d
Ol y m pi c View
D
r
8 0 th
A
v
eW
8 8 th
A
v
eW
196th St SW
Su
n
s
e
t
A
v
e
104
99
524
O l y m p i c V i e w
D r
City of Edmonds Comprehensive Transportation Plan Update
Recommended Roadway Projects
Imrovement Types
Install signal
Install roundabout
Add lane on intersection approach
Widen road
Project Category
Concurrency
Safety
Highway of Statewide Signifi cance
0 0.5 1
Miles
City boundary
Railroad
Water feature
Packet Page 843 of 930
City of Edmonds Comprehensive Transportation Plan Update
Draft Traffi c Calming Program
Phase 1 Residents Petition
for local street traffi c concerns:
cut-through, travel speed, safety
(minimum of 8 signatures)
Staff Reviews
qualifi cation for traffi c calming program
• 25% or 15 cut-through per hour, or
• 85th percentile speed >5 mph over speed limit, or
• 3 collisions in past 3 years
and
• minimum average daily traffi c of 500 vehicles
Qualifi es
Does Not Qualify
Phase 2 Staff and Residents
Develop Less Restrictive Solutions
brush trimming, educational campaign, pavement markings,
police enforcement, portable radar trailer, signing,
speed watch program
Implement and Evaluate Less Restrictive Solutions
Less Restrictive
Solutions Are
Not Eff ective
Less Restrictive
Solutions Are
Eff ective
Phase 3 Staff Reviews Tra ffi c Calming Devices
funding, priority, technical feasibility
Staff Develops Tra ffi c Calming Solutions with Police and
Firefi ghter Approval
bulb-outs, chicanes, diagonal diverters, full closure, medians,
partial closure, traffi c circles
Residents Vote on
Approval of Tra ffi c Calming Device
60% or
Greater
Residents
Approve
Install Tra ffi c Calming Device
Fewer than
60% Residents
Approve
Bulb Out
Chicane
Partial Closure
Tra ffi c Circle
End
End
End
This program applies to neighborhood residential through-streets.
6–12
months
later
Staff Evaluates Eff ectiveness of Device
Note: T his is a recommended future program. No funding is currently available.
Packet Page 844 of 930
Main St
76
t
h
A ve
W
75
t
h
P
l
W
O l ym
p i c V
i e w D r
208th St SW
9 5t
h
Pl
W
212th St SW
220t h St SW
6 8t
h
A
ve
W
F
i
r
d
a
l
e
A
v
e
Dayton St
7t
h
A
e
N
10
0
t
h
A
v
e
W
76
t
h
A
ve
W
O l ym
p ic
V
i
e
w
D
r
238th St SW
176th St SW
Bow
doin Way
180thSt SW
Walnut St
3r
d
A
v
e
S
244th St SW
5t
h
A
v
e
S
236th St SW
3 rd
A
v
e
N
8 4t
h
A
ve
W
9t
h
A
v
e
S
238th StSW
200th St SWCaspers St
7 6 th
A
v e W
Puget Dr
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
W
y
M ap
l
ew
o o
dD
r
228t h St SW
9t
h
A
v
e
N
Meado
w
d
a
l
e
B
e
a
c
h
R
o
a
d
Oly m pic View
D
r
80
t
hA
v
eW
8 8 t hA
v
eW
196th St SW
Su
n
s
e
t
A
v
e
104
99
524
Snohomish County
King County
Ed
monds- K
i
n
g
sto
n
To/
F
r
o
m
E
v
e
r
e
t
t
T
o
/
F
r
o
m
S
e
a
t
t
l
e
City of Edmonds Comprehensive Transportation Plan Update
Access to Transit
Train station/park-and-ride lot
Park-and-ride lot
Community Transit bus stop
Existing bus route
Ferry route
Commuter rail route
0.25-mile bus stop zone
0 0.5 1
Miles
City boundary
Railroad
Water feature
Approximately 81%
of 2000 population is
located within 0.25-mile
of a transit stop.
Approximately 700 buses
serve Edmonds daily
Packet Page 845 of 930
104
99
524
Snohomish County
King County
Main
S
t
7 6 th
A
v
eW
75
t
h P
l
W
Oly
m
pic
V
i
ew
D r
208th St
S
W
9 5 t h
P l
W
212th St SW
220th St S W
6 8 th
A v e W
F
i
r
d
a
l
e
A
v
e
Dayt on St
7t
h
A
e
N
10
0
t
h
A
v
e
W
76
t
h
A
ve
W
Oly
m
p
i
c
Vi
e
w D r
238th St S W
176th St SW
Bowd
o
i
n Way
180th StSW
Walnut St
3r
d
A
v
e
S
244th St SW
5t
h
A
v
e
S
236th
S
t SW
3rd
A
v
e
N
8 4 t hA
v
eW
9t
h
A
v
e
S
238th St SW
200th St SWCaspersSt
76
t hA
v
e
W
Puget Dr
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
W
y
Ma
p
l
e
wo
o d
D
r
228th St
S
W
9t
h
A
v
e
N
Meado
w
d
a
l
e
B
e
a
c
h
R
o
a
d
Olym pic View
D
r
8 0
th
A
v
eW
8 8 th
A
v
eW
196th St SW
Su
n
s
e
t
A
v
e
176th St SW
184th St SW
72
n
d
A
v
e
W
2n
d
A
v
e
S
Pine St
226th St SW
8t
h
A
v
e
S
Maple St
Ol
y
m
p
i
c
A
v
e
190th Pl SW
92
n
d
A
v
e
W
188th St SW
186th St SW
192nd St SW
84
t
h
A
v
e
W
An
d
o
v
e
r
S
t
189th Pl SW
191st St SW
80
t
h
A
v
e
W
Ro
b
i
n
H
o
o
d
D
r
232nd St SW
234th St SW
236th St SW
City of Edmonds Comprehensive Transportation Plan Update
Recommended Walkway Projects
Short walkway project
Long walkway project
0 0.5 1
Miles
City boundary
Railroad
Water feature
Packet Page 846 of 930
City of Edmonds Comprehensive Transportation Plan Update
Draft Curb Ramp Program
This program consists of upgrades of intersection curb ramps to
meet the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).
Of approximately 350 intersections in Edmonds:
42 fully meet ADA standards
2 4 par tially meet ADA standards
Priority for upgrades of curb ramps at sub-standard locations:
1. Downtown receives priority over locations outside of downtown
2. Arterial streets receive priority over local access streets
3. Intersections receive higher priority if they are near:
a. Community Centers / Senior Center / Health Facilities
b. Transit stops / Schools / Public Buildings
c. Commercial areas and parks
Note: T his is a future recommended program and is currently
unfunded.
Packet Page 847 of 930
Main
S
t
76
t
hA
ve
W
7 5t
h
P lW
Oly
m
p i cV
i e wD
r
208th St SW
95
th
P
lW
212th St SW
220t h St SW
68
th
A
v
eW
F
i
r
d
a
l
e
A
v
e
Dayton St
7t
h
A
e
N
10
0
t
h
A
v
e
W
76
t
h
A
ve
W
Ol ym
pi c V i e wD
r
238t h St SW
176th St SW
Bowd
oin Way
180th St SW
Walnut St
3r
d
A
v
e
S
244thStSW
5t
h
A
v
e
S
236th St SW
3 rd
A
v
e
N
8 4 t h
Av
e
W
9t
h
A
v
e
S
238th St SW
200th St SWCaspersSt
7 6 t hA
v eW
Pug et Dr
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
W
y
M ap
le
w
o o
d D
r
228th St SW
9t
h
A
v
e
N
Meado
w
d
a
l
e
B
e
a
c
h
R
o
a
d
Ol y m p i cView D
r
80
t hA
ve
W
88
th
A
v
e
W
196th St SW
Su
n
s
e
t
A
v
e
104
99
524
Snohomish County
King County
City of Edmonds Comprehensive Transportation Plan Update
Proposed Bicycle Routes
Short bicycle loop (5 miles)
Medium bicycle loop (7 miles)
Long bicycle loop (20 miles)
0 0.5 1
Miles
City boundary
Railroad
Water feature
Packet Page 848 of 930
City of Edmonds Comprehensive Transportation Plan Update
Edmonds Crossing Project
Construct new multimodal facility at ferry terminal, connecting
ferry, automobile, transit, bicycle, and pedestrian traffi c in
downtown Edmonds.
Pavement Maintenance Program
Provide improvements to maintain pavement on city streets, such
as asphalt overlays and fi lling of potholes.
Spot Improvements on City Streets
Provide lower cost improvements such as signal timing upgrades
or localized street improvements to improve vehicle safety
and mobility.
Spot Improvements for Walkways and Bikeways
Provide lower cost improvements such as pedestrian lighting and
bicycle parking to improve non-motorized safety and mobility.
Other Transportation Projects
Packet Page 849 of 930
City of Edmonds Comprehensive Transportation Plan Update
Costs Verses Projected Revenue
through 2025
Summary of Project Costs
through 2025
Total Costs through 2025 = $109,044,500
Costs and Revenue
Total Revenue Identiied through 2025 = $41,443,300
Joint Agency Funding
Interest Income
Real Estate Excise Tax
Development Sidewalks
Sources of Identifi ed Revenue:
Grants (unsecured)
Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax
Traffi c Impact/Mitigation Fees
Transfers from Other Funds
Utility Resurfacing
Identified
Funding,
$41,433,300
Shortfall,
$67,611,200
Concurrency 2010-2015,
$8,954,800
Concurrency 2016-2025,
$7,137,000
HSS Operational,
$9,706,400
Safety, $24,081,200
Walkway, $13,435,000
Curb Ramp Upgrade,
$4,189,500
Bikeway, $145,000
Preservation &
Maintenance,
$16,776,000
Edmonds Crossing,
$17,500,000
Traffic Calming,
$160,000
Spot Roadway
Enhancements,
$240,000
Other, $6,719,600
Packet Page 850 of 930
Packet Page 851 of 930
Appendix B
Traffic Calming Program
Packet Page 852 of 930
Packet Page 853 of 930
Traffic Calming Program
This Appendix provides a description of the City’s Traffic Calming Program. This neighborhood
traffic calming program is designed to assist residents and City staff in responding to
neighborhood traffic issues related to speeding, cut-through traffic, and safety. Implementation of
a traffic calming program allows traffic concerns to be addressed consistently and traffic calming
measures to be efficiently developed and put into operation.
In establishing a neighborhood traffic calming program, the City must take into account the
restriction that no deviation from WSDOT design standards is permitted on principal arterials,
minor arterials and collector streets without express approval of the WSDOT local programs
engineer (RCW 35.78). This limitation does not apply to local access streets, which are defined
by RCW 35.78.010 as streets “…generally limited to providing access to abutting property…
tributary to major and secondary thoroughfares… generally discouraging through traffic…”
Therefore, the City’s traffic calming program focuses on local access streets.
The City’s Traffic Calming Program consists of a three-phase process.
Phase 1 (Petition and Review for Qualification): To begin the process, residents submit a
petition for local street traffic concerns, and the City reviews the application and investigates
the site to determine if the application qualifies for the Traffic Calming Program.
Phase 2 (Education and Enforcement) focuses on education and enforcement solutions,
including educational flyers, police enforcement, neighborhood speed watch, signing, and
striping modifications. If the less restrictive solutions are not effective, then the process
moves on to Phase 3.
Phase 3 (Installation of Traffic Calming Device) consists of working with residents to
identify the appropriate traffic calming device to be installed, which could include traffic
circles, chicanes, and narrowed lanes. If approved by residents in the affected area, the device
is planned for installation.
Packet Page 854 of 930
Exhibit A illustrates the three-phase process. Each phase of the Traffic Calming Program is
summarized in the following sections.
Due to economic considerations, city streets that are ineligible for the Traffic Calming Program
include:
1. Streets classified other than local streets, including dead-end streets (most local streets in
Edmonds are dead-end streets).
2. Streets scheduled for resurfacing within the next two years.
3. Streets with grades, curvatures or other physical conditions where addition of any device
would create unsafe conditions.
4. Streets not meeting average daily traffic requirements (see Phase 1 Qualification section).
Packet Page 855 of 930
End with
notice
letter
Phase 1 Residents petition for
local street traffic concerns
(minimum of 8 signatures)
Qualifies
Does
not
qualify
Phase 2
Qualifies
Staff and residents develop
education and enforcement solutions
Implement education and enforcement solutions
3-6 months later
Phase 3
Staff evaluates effectiveness of solutions
85th percentile speed
≤ 5 mph over speed limit
Residents vote on
approval of traffic
calming device
≥ 60% of residents
who return ballots
approve
Design and install traffic calming device
< 60% of
residents
approve
6–12 months later
Staff evaluates effectiveness of device
Staff reviews and collects data
Qualification for traffic calming program
and
tBOEDVUUIrPVHIQFSIPVr, or
tUIQFrcFnUJMFTQFFE NQIovFSTQFFEMJNJt
85th percentile
speed ≤ 10 mph
but > 5 mph over
speed limit
85th percentile speed
> 10 mph over speed limit
or
Cut-through traffic per hour >
25% and 15 vehiclesEnd with notice letter stating
program objectives have been met
Review
other
solutions
End with
notice
letter.
Staff reviews traffic calming devices
for funding, priority, technical feasibility
Staff develops traffic calming solutions
with police and fire departments’ aprroval
May 2009
Exhibit A. Traffic Calming Program Process
Packet Page 856 of 930
Phase 1 – Petition and Review for Qualification
Phase 1 of the program includes resident petition to begin the process and City review for
qualification of the application.. Phase 1 consists of the following steps;
Citizen Action Re uest and Petition
The program begins when a resident turns in a “Citizen Action Request Form” and a “Petition
Form” to show neighborhood consensus of the traffic concerns.
The Citizen Action Request Form, as shown in Exhibit B, identifies the type of traffic
concerns, such as cut-through traffic and vehicle speed, present in the neighborhood.
The Petition Form, as shown in Exhibit C, indicates neighborhood consensus that the traffic
concerns should be studied. A minimum of eight adult resident signatures from separate
addresses on the subject street will be required prior to going forward with the program.
City Staff Review
City staff will research the issues and acknowledge the requestor if the petition is a candidate for
the program.
The issues must be on a local access (non-arterial/non-collector) street. If the traffic concern
is on an arterial or collector, City staff will inform the Police Department of the concern and
ask for additional enforcement.
City staff will also acknowledge the requestor if the issues have been previously reviewed
and action has taken; if previous investigations have deemed the problem unsolvable, and if
the problem is part of an ongoing investigation/action.
Site Visit and Data Collection
City staff will schedule a meeting with the residents at the problem location to investigate the
traffic concerns. City staff will survey traffic signing, pavement markings, sight distances,
parking, and road conditions along the subject street.
If there appear to be simple solutions to the issues, such as brush trimming, speed limit signs,
or channelization, City will implement them as soon as feasible.
If the issues are not easy to identify from the site survey, City staff will collect baseline traffic
data (traffic volume counts, cut-through traffic, travel speed, and historical accident data) for
problem clarification and for future evaluation.
ualification
City staff will compare the baseline traffic data to the following criteria to determine if the
petition qualifies for the program. The criteria to determine if a petition qualifies for the program
include the following:
Packet Page 857 of 930
The average daily traffic volume on the subject street must be between 500 and 1,000
vehicles per day, because average daily traffic below or above these limits is not suitable for a
neighborhood traffic calming device.
If the traffic concern is related to safety, there have been at least 3 reported collisions in the
past 3 years at the same location.
If the traffic concern is related to cut-through traffic, the peak hour (AM or PM, whatever is
higher) cut-through traffic is greater than 25% of total traffic or greater than 15 vehicles per
hour.
If the traffic concern is related to speeding, the daily 85th percentile speed (the speed that
85% of the cars are traveling at or below) is 5 mph over the posted speed limit.
If the baseline traffic data show that the criteria are not met, the City will inform the requestor,
record the request and continue to monitor the situation.
Packet Page 858 of 930
Exhibit B. Citizen Action Re uest Form for the Traffic Calming Program
Citizen Action Re uest Form - Traffic Calming Program
Contact Name: Day Phone:
E-mail Address:
Address:
Location of Concern:
Neighborhood Traffic Concern (Check applicable concerns):
Speeding Cut-Through Traffic Pedestrian/Bicycle/Traffic Safety
Other:
What, in your opinion, is the root cause of the problem
T
hank you for taking the time to complete the Citizen Action Re uest Form.
Please send the completed form with the Neighborhood Petition Form to:
City of Edmonds
Attn: Public Works Engineering Department
121 5th Avenue N
Edmonds, WA 98020
Once we receive the form, the Public Works Engineering Department will investigate
your re uest. If you have uestions or comments, please call the transportation
engineer at (425) 771-0220.
Packet Page 859 of 930
Exhibit C. Neighborhood Petition Form for the Traffic Calming Program
Neighborhood Petition Form - Traffic Calming Program
Contact Name:
Location of Concern:
Eight (8) neighbor signatures, one per household, are re uired prior to initiate the
Traffic Calming process in our neighborhood. If you agree that the issues stated in the
Citizen Action Re uest Form exist on our residential street, please sign below with your
address and phone number.
The Traffic Calming process involves active participation of our community. The
decision making process may re uire us to set and attend neighborhood meetings and
conduct further petition campaigns.
Name Address Phone Signature
Make additional copies as necessary.
Packet Page 860 of 930
Phase 2 – Education and Enforcement
Phase 2 of the program focuses solutions that include education of drivers on existing traffic
regulations, and a focus on enforcement of those regulations. During this phase, neighborhood
concerns are addressed by informing drivers of safety issues, by using traffic enforcement
techniques, or by adding signs or pavement markings to change driver behavior. These solutions
can be an effective way to address speeding within neighborhoods by residents themselves. The
City can implement these less restrictive solutions more easily and quickly than physical traffic
calming devices. It is recognized, however, that these solutions may produce benefits that are
only temporary, and that conditions need to be monitored. Phase 2 consists of the following steps:
Development of Solutions
If the application is qualified for the program, then City staff will use the baseline traffic data,
along with insights and suggestions from area residents, to determine which solutions will be
used to improve the traffic issues.
Table Table 1 provides a comparison of advantages, disadvantages, and effectiveness of potential
Phase 2 solutions.
Implementation
Once the solutions are determined, they will be implemented with the assistance of the
neighborhood residents. The solutions would be implemented for at least three months to provide
a traffic adjustment period.
Evaluation
Eight to fourteen months after the Phase 2 solutions have been implemented, conditions will be
evaluated by City staff based on new traffic, speed, and accident data. The results will be
compared with the previous data to measure the effectiveness of these traffic calming solutions.
There are three possible outcomes based on the results:
If the daily 85th percentile speed is 5 mph or less over the posted limit; or if peak hour (AM
or PM) cut-through traffic is at or less than 25% of the total traffic or less than 15 cut-through
vehicles, no further action will be taken.
If the daily 85th percentile speed is 10 mph or less but above 5 mph over the posted limit,
another Phase 2 solution will be developed and implemented. The City staff will meet with
the requestor and neighborhood residents to review if other solutions would be more
effective.
The application will move to Phase 3 if it meets the following conditions:
The daily 85th percentile is 10 mph over the posted limit; or
The peak hour (AM or PM) cut-through traffic is greater than 25% of the total traffic and
greater than 15 vehicles per hour.
Packet Page 861 of 930
Ta
b
l
e
1
.
C
o
m
p
a
r
i
s
o
n
o
f
P
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
P
h
a
s
e
2
S
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
s
Po
s
s
i
b
l
e
So
l
u
t
i
o
n
A
d
v
a
n
t
a
g
e
D
i
s
a
d
v
a
n
t
a
g
e
Sa
f
e
t
y
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
Sp
e
e
d
Re
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
Vo
l
u
m
e
Re
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
Cu
t
-
th
r
o
u
g
h
Tr
a
f
f
i
c
Re
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
C
o
s
t
Em
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
Se
r
v
i
c
e
Ed
u
c
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
Ca
m
p
a
i
g
n
Lo
w
c
o
s
t
.
Ca
n
b
e
r
e
l
a
t
i
v
e
l
y
e
f
f
e
c
t
i
v
e
.
In
v
o
l
v
e
s
a
n
d
e
m
p
o
w
e
r
s
c
i
t
i
z
e
n
s
.
Ma
y
t
a
k
e
t
i
m
e
t
o
b
e
e
f
f
e
c
t
i
v
e
.
Ef
f
e
c
t
i
v
e
n
e
s
s
m
a
y
d
e
c
r
e
a
s
e
o
v
e
r
t
i
m
e
.
No
t
l
i
k
e
l
y
t
o
b
e
a
s
e
f
f
e
c
t
i
v
e
o
n
n
o
n
-
l
o
c
a
l
tr
a
f
f
i
c
.
Ca
n
b
e
t
i
m
e
c
o
n
s
u
m
i
n
g
.
(1
)
(
1
)
N
o
E
f
f
e
c
t
P
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
L
o
w
N
o
E
f
f
e
c
t
Pa
v
e
m
e
n
t
Ma
r
k
i
n
g
s
Re
m
a
i
n
s
e
f
f
e
c
t
i
v
e
o
n
o
c
c
a
s
i
o
n
a
l
u
s
e
r
s
.
De
l
i
n
e
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
a
r
e
a
a
n
d
bi
c
y
c
l
e
l
a
n
e
c
r
e
a
t
e
s
t
h
e
i
m
p
r
e
s
s
i
o
n
o
f
a
na
r
r
o
w
e
d
r
o
a
d
w
a
y
,
r
e
d
u
c
i
n
g
s
p
e
e
d
.
Di
s
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
s
v
e
h
i
c
l
e
s
f
r
o
m
d
r
i
v
i
n
g
i
n
o
r
al
o
n
g
t
h
e
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
l
a
n
e
.
Fe
w
e
r
l
a
n
e
c
o
n
f
l
i
c
t
s
.
Mo
r
e
d
e
f
i
n
e
d
d
r
i
v
i
n
g
p
a
t
t
e
r
n
s
,
r
e
d
u
c
e
d
po
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
f
o
r
a
c
c
i
d
e
n
t
s
o
f
t
h
e
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
,
pa
s
s
i
n
g
o
n
t
h
e
r
i
g
h
t
,
s
i
d
e
s
w
i
p
e
,
a
n
d
pa
r
k
e
d
v
e
h
i
c
l
e
v
a
r
i
e
t
y
.
Po
s
i
t
i
v
e
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
r
e
a
c
t
i
o
n
.
Ef
f
e
c
t
i
v
e
n
e
s
s
m
a
y
d
e
c
r
e
a
s
e
o
v
e
r
t
i
m
e
.
Ma
y
r
e
s
u
l
t
i
n
l
e
s
s
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
d
u
e
t
o
d
r
i
v
e
w
a
y
an
d
i
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
i
g
h
t
d
i
s
t
a
n
c
e
s
.
Th
e
u
s
e
o
f
r
a
i
s
e
d
b
u
t
t
o
n
s
a
s
s
t
r
i
p
i
n
g
m
a
y
in
t
e
r
f
e
r
e
w
i
t
h
s
n
o
w
r
e
m
o
v
a
l
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
.
In
c
r
e
a
s
e
d
m
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
c
o
s
t
s
f
o
r
s
t
r
i
p
i
n
g
in
s
p
e
c
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
r
e
-
s
t
r
i
p
i
n
g
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
.
(2
)
(2
)
N
o
N
o
t
L
i
k
e
l
y
L
o
w
N
o
E
f
f
e
c
t
Po
l
i
c
e
En
f
o
r
c
e
m
e
n
t
Go
o
d
t
e
m
p
o
r
a
r
y
p
u
b
l
i
c
r
e
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
t
o
o
l
.
Se
r
v
e
s
t
o
i
n
f
o
r
m
p
u
b
l
i
c
t
h
a
t
s
p
e
e
d
i
n
g
i
s
un
d
e
s
i
r
a
b
l
e
b
e
h
a
v
i
o
r
f
o
r
w
h
i
c
h
t
h
e
r
e
a
r
e
co
n
s
e
q
u
e
n
c
e
s
.
Ef
f
e
c
t
i
s
n
o
t
p
e
r
m
a
n
e
n
t
.
Po
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
l
y
e
x
p
e
n
s
i
v
e
.
Bu
d
g
e
t
a
n
d
m
a
n
p
o
w
e
r
c
o
n
s
t
r
a
i
n
t
s
.
Ye
s
,
Te
m
p
o
r
a
r
i
l
y
Ye
s
,
Te
m
p
o
r
a
r
i
l
y
No
t
L
i
k
e
l
y
Y
e
s
,
Te
m
p
o
r
a
r
i
l
y
Me
d
i
u
m
to
H
i
g
h
No
E
f
f
e
c
t
Po
r
t
a
b
l
e
Ra
d
a
r
T
r
a
i
l
e
r
He
i
g
h
t
e
n
s
m
o
t
o
r
i
s
t
s
’
a
w
a
r
e
n
e
s
s
o
f
d
r
i
v
i
n
g
be
h
a
v
i
o
r
a
n
d
i
t
s
i
m
p
a
c
t
o
n
t
h
e
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
.
Po
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
l
y
r
e
d
u
c
e
v
e
h
i
c
l
e
s
p
e
e
d
b
y
1
t
o
6
mp
h
i
n
t
h
e
v
i
c
i
n
i
t
y
o
f
t
h
e
s
i
g
n
.
Ma
y
t
a
k
e
t
i
m
e
t
o
b
e
e
f
f
e
c
t
i
v
e
.
Ef
f
e
c
t
i
v
e
n
e
s
s
m
a
y
d
e
c
r
e
a
s
e
o
v
e
r
t
i
m
e
.
St
a
t
i
o
n
a
r
y
r
a
d
a
r
s
i
g
n
s
m
u
s
t
b
e
n
e
a
r
po
w
e
r
s
o
u
r
c
e
.
Ye
s
,
Te
m
p
o
r
a
r
i
l
y
Ye
s
,
Te
m
p
o
r
a
r
i
l
y
No
Y
e
s
,
Te
m
p
o
r
a
r
i
l
y
Lo
w
t
o
Me
d
i
u
m
No
E
f
f
e
c
t
Ra
i
s
e
d
Pa
v
e
m
e
n
t
Ma
r
k
e
r
s
Re
l
a
t
i
v
e
l
y
i
n
e
x
p
e
n
s
i
v
e
t
o
i
n
s
t
a
l
l
.
Cr
e
a
t
e
s
d
r
i
v
e
r
a
w
a
r
e
n
e
s
s
.
Ma
y
r
e
d
u
c
e
s
p
e
e
d
s
.
Ma
y
a
d
v
e
r
s
e
l
y
i
m
p
a
c
t
b
i
c
y
c
l
i
s
t
s
.
Ra
i
s
e
d
p
a
v
e
m
e
n
t
m
a
r
k
e
r
s
a
r
e
n
o
i
s
y
b
y
de
s
i
g
n
,
t
h
e
r
e
f
o
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
i
n
f
r
o
n
t
o
f
re
s
i
d
e
n
c
e
s
s
h
o
u
l
d
b
e
c
a
r
e
f
u
l
l
y
(3
)
(3
)
N
o
t
L
i
k
e
l
y
N
o
t
L
i
k
e
l
y
M
e
d
i
u
m
to
H
i
g
h
No
E
f
f
e
c
t
Packet Page 862 of 930
Po
s
s
i
b
l
e
So
l
u
t
i
o
n
A
d
v
a
n
t
a
g
e
D
i
s
a
d
v
a
n
t
a
g
e
Sa
f
e
t
y
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
Sp
e
e
d
Re
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
Vo
l
u
m
e
Re
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
Cu
t
-
th
r
o
u
g
h
Tr
a
f
f
i
c
Re
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
C
o
s
t
Em
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
Se
r
v
i
c
e
co
n
s
i
d
e
r
e
d
.
Ma
y
i
n
t
e
r
f
e
r
e
w
i
t
h
s
n
o
w
r
e
m
o
v
a
l
ac
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
.
Si
g
n
i
n
g
Ma
y
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
n
e
e
d
e
d
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
t
o
t
h
e
dr
i
v
e
r
t
h
a
t
w
a
s
n
o
t
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
d
a
l
r
e
a
d
y
o
n
th
e
s
t
r
e
e
t
.
Ty
p
i
c
a
l
l
y
s
a
f
e
t
y
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
s
i
n
t
h
e
l
o
n
g
r
u
n
wh
e
n
u
n
w
a
r
r
a
n
t
e
d
s
i
g
n
s
a
r
e
r
e
m
o
v
e
d
.
Re
m
o
v
a
l
o
f
t
e
m
p
o
r
a
r
y
s
t
o
p
s
i
g
n
s
i
s
o
f
t
e
n
ve
r
y
d
i
f
f
i
c
u
l
t
t
o
a
c
c
e
p
t
f
o
r
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
u
s
e
d
to
h
a
v
i
n
g
t
h
e
m
t
h
e
r
e
,
e
v
e
n
w
h
e
n
t
h
e
si
g
n
s
a
r
e
u
n
w
a
r
r
a
n
t
e
d
.
Ov
e
r
-
s
i
g
n
i
n
g
a
n
a
r
e
a
c
a
n
c
r
e
a
t
e
a
l
o
s
s
o
f
ef
f
e
c
t
i
v
e
n
e
s
s
.
In
c
r
e
a
s
e
d
m
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
c
o
s
t
s
.
Po
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
P
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
N
o
t
L
i
k
e
l
y
N
o
t
L
i
k
e
l
y
L
o
w
N
o
E
f
f
e
c
t
Sp
e
e
d
W
a
t
c
h
Pr
o
g
r
a
m
Pr
o
m
o
t
e
s
n
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
i
n
v
o
l
v
e
m
e
n
t
t
o
ad
d
r
e
s
s
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
i
s
s
u
e
s
(
e
x
c
e
s
s
i
v
e
s
p
e
e
d
as
w
e
l
l
a
s
o
t
h
e
r
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
c
o
n
c
e
r
n
s
)
.
He
i
g
h
t
e
n
s
m
o
t
o
r
i
s
t
s
’
a
w
a
r
e
n
e
s
s
o
f
d
r
i
v
i
n
g
be
h
a
v
i
o
r
a
n
d
i
t
s
i
m
p
a
c
t
o
n
t
h
e
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
.
Pr
o
v
i
d
e
s
t
h
e
P
o
l
i
c
e
D
e
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
w
i
t
h
sp
e
c
i
f
i
c
t
i
m
e
s
f
o
r
s
e
l
e
c
t
i
v
e
e
n
f
o
r
c
e
m
e
n
t
.
De
t
e
r
m
i
n
e
s
i
f
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
i
s
c
u
t
-
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
.
Ti
m
e
c
o
n
s
u
m
i
n
g
f
o
r
n
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
re
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
.
Ma
y
t
a
k
e
t
i
m
e
t
o
b
e
e
f
f
e
c
t
i
v
e
.
Ef
f
e
c
t
i
v
e
n
e
s
s
m
a
y
d
e
c
r
e
a
s
e
o
v
e
r
t
i
m
e
.
(4
)
(
4
)
N
o
Y
e
s
,
Te
m
p
o
r
a
r
i
l
y
Lo
w
N
o
E
f
f
e
c
t
(1
)
T
e
m
p
o
r
a
r
y
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
w
i
l
l
o
c
c
u
r
i
f
t
h
e
m
a
j
o
r
i
t
y
o
f
s
p
e
e
d
e
r
s
i
n
t
h
e
n
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
a
r
e
n
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
.
(2
)
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
w
i
l
l
d
e
p
e
n
d
o
n
t
h
e
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
r
o
a
d
a
n
d
t
h
e
t
y
p
e
o
f
s
t
r
i
p
i
n
g
.
T
h
i
s
w
i
l
l
h
a
v
e
t
o
b
e
d
e
t
e
r
m
i
n
e
d
o
n
a
c
a
s
e
-
b
y
-
c
a
s
e
b
a
si
s
.
(3
)
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
w
i
l
l
d
e
p
e
n
d
o
n
h
o
w
d
e
v
i
c
e
i
s
u
s
e
d
.
(4
)
T
e
m
p
o
r
a
r
y
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
r
e
p
o
s
s
i
b
l
e
w
h
e
n
a
l
l
o
f
t
h
e
s
p
e
e
d
e
r
s
r
e
c
e
i
v
e
l
e
t
t
e
r
s
f
r
o
m
t
h
e
P
o
l
i
c
e
D
e
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
.
Packet Page 863 of 930
Phase 3 – Installation of Traffic Calming Devices
Phase 3 of the program involves modifying the physical geometry of the roadway to install traffic
calming devices. Traffic calming devices are much more expensive and more restrictive to local
traffic than the education and enforcement solutions in Phase 2. Because of this, traffic calming
devices require a much greater level of resident involvement and agreement for implementation.
Phase 3 consists of the following steps:
City Staff Review
If the petition qualifies for a traffic calming device, City staff will conduct a preliminary review
with the following tasks.
City staff will score the petition by using the Scoring Criteria shown in Table 2. Because
traffic calming devices are much more expensive to implement than Phase 2 solutions, the
City will use the score to decide the priority to fund a traffic calming device. Applications
will be processed in order of priority, in accordance with available funding.
City staff will identify the technical feasibility and constraints of potential traffic calming
devices. The following are technical aspects that will be considered when reviewing the
proposed placement of a traffic calming device:
Traffic rerouting. It must be assured that the problem will not shift to adjacent streets.
Adequate provisions should be made for buses (school, metro, para-transit), garbage
collection, moving vans, construction equipment, pedestrians, and bicyclists, where
traffic calming devices are installed.
Emergency response times and the need to move vehicles through the area should be
considered. The cumulative effect of traffic calming devices on emergency vehicle
response times should also be considered.
Drainage. It must be assured that devices will allow adequate drainage.
If curbs and gutters are not present, the design of individual devices may need to be
modified to restrict drivers from using the shoulders to avoid the devices.
Proximity to other traffic calming devices and intersections.
Roadway surface conditions. Traffic calming devices should be installed on paved
roadways with good surface conditions.
Roadway grade. Some traffic calming devices should not be used on grades exceeding
8%.
Effect of the devices on street sweeping and other maintenance activities.
Potential loss of on-street parking.
Potential increase in noise levels due to the device.
Potential changes to community character.
Sight distance obstructions related to landscaping, fences, roadway alignment, grade, etc.
Packet Page 864 of 930
Potential impact to residential driveways.
City staff will define the study area to ensure it includes all residents that could be affected by
a traffic calming device.
Table 2. Scoring Criteria for Traffic Calming Devices
Criterion Points
Average Weekday Daily Traffic (AWDT)
500 – 1,000 vehicles/day 1
1,001 – 2,000 vehicles/day 2
2,001 – 3,000 vehicles/day 3
Traffic Speed (85th Percentile)
5.1 – 8.0 mph above posted limit 2
8.1 – 10.0 mph above posted limit 4
More than 10 mph above posted limit 6
Cut-Through Traffic
25% - 49% of AWDT 1
50% - 74% of AWDT 2
More than 74% of AWDT 3
Accident History of Past 3 Years
1 accident/year 3
2 accidents/year 4
3 accidents/year 5
More than 3 accidents/year 7
Parks / Schools
Greater than 6 blocks 1
Between 3 and 6 blocks 2
Within 3 blocks 3
Street Conditions
Sidewalks on both sides of street 1
Sidewalks on one side of street 2
No Sidewalks 3
Packet Page 865 of 930
Development of Traffic Calming Solutions
City staff will hold a public meeting for all residents within the study area. In conjunction with
neighborhood volunteers, City staff will organize the meeting and ensure the neighborhood
residents are notified of the meeting. The meeting may include following discussions.
Review the effectiveness of Phase 2 solutions.
Discuss the funding and priority of the application among other traffic calming applications
within the City.
Discuss possible traffic calming devices and advantages, disadvantages, and special concerns
of these devices.
Discuss the entire process for Phase 3 implementation.
Establish workgroups to allow residents to work out the solutions with the help of City staff.
Include the Fire and Police Departments to discuss possible reduction in response times with
traffic calming devices, cumulative effect with existing devices, and other issues relating to
specific concerns of the neighborhood layout.
The workgroups will discuss the problems and alternative solutions with their neighbors and
report their findings to the rest of the group and City staff. The City staff will evaluate technical
feasibility of the traffic calming devices that are selected by the neighborhood workgroups. The
City staff will then determine the preferred traffic calming device with the approval from the Fire
and Police Departments.
Table 3 provides a comparison of advantages, disadvantages, and effectiveness of potential traffic
calming devices.
Approval for Preferred Device
When a preferred traffic calming device is selected, the City staff will send out a voting sheet to
each of the affected residents. For a traffic calming device to be implemented, 60% of the
households, based on returned ballots, must approve the installation of the proposed traffic
calming device.
Installation of Traffic Calming Device
Once funding is available for the application, the City will begin the design and construction of
the approved traffic calming device. Tasks before the construction of the device are discussed
below.
Baseline Data Collection
Before the installation of the device, City staff will collect baseline traffic data within the study
area for future comparison and effectiveness evaluation. This traffic data will be used to evaluate
whether traffic shifted from the subject street to adjacent streets and to what extent the traffic
Packet Page 866 of 930
shifted after a device was installed. The baseline data will also be used to evaluate the
effectiveness of a device by comparison to future traffic data.
Installation of Temporary Device
A temporary device may be installed for traffic calming measures, such as diverter, full closure,
and partial closure. If appropriate, the City will install a temporary device for up to 6 months to
provide a trial period.
If proposed by the City, the City will evaluate the effectiveness of the device and examine
whether traffic shifted from the subject street to adjacent local streets. If more than 150 vehicles
per day have been added to an adjacent street as a result of the traffic calming device, the City
may modify the traffic calming solution.
Maintenance of Landscaping
Landscaping can be included in the installation of some traffic calming devices. However,
neighborhood volunteers must sign up to maintain the landscaping. Otherwise, decorative paving
will be used. In some areas of the City, landscaping is provided through the flower program.
Evaluation
If proposed by the City, six to 12 months after the traffic calming device has been installed, City
staff will collect traffic data on surrounding streets to ensure the device did not shift traffic from
the subject street to adjacent local access streets.
Packet Page 867 of 930
Ta
b
l
e
3
.
C
o
m
p
a
r
i
s
o
n
o
f
P
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
P
h
a
s
e
3
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
C
a
l
m
i
n
g
D
e
v
i
c
e
s
Po
s
s
i
b
l
e
So
l
u
t
i
o
n
A
d
v
a
n
t
a
g
e
D
i
s
a
d
v
a
n
t
a
g
e
Sa
f
e
t
y
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
Sp
e
e
d
Re
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
Vo
l
u
m
e
Re
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
Cu
t
-
th
r
o
u
g
h
Tr
a
f
f
i
c
Re
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
C
o
s
t
Em
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
Se
r
v
i
c
e
Bu
l
b
-
O
u
t
s
Re
d
u
c
e
s
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
s
’
c
r
o
s
s
i
n
g
di
s
t
a
n
c
e
.
Na
r
r
o
w
e
d
l
a
n
e
s
c
a
n
s
l
o
w
v
e
h
i
c
l
e
s
.
Ma
y
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
s
i
g
h
t
d
i
s
t
a
n
c
e
a
t
in
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
.
Ma
y
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
r
e
m
o
v
a
l
o
f
s
o
m
e
o
n
-
s
t
r
e
e
t
pa
r
k
i
n
g
.
Ma
y
l
i
m
i
t
m
a
r
k
e
d
b
i
c
y
c
l
e
l
a
n
e
s
.
In
c
r
e
a
s
e
d
m
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
f
o
r
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
i
n
g
,
st
r
e
e
t
s
w
e
e
p
i
n
g
,
a
n
d
c
u
r
b
r
e
p
a
i
r
.
Ma
y
l
i
m
i
t
p
o
s
s
i
b
l
e
n
e
w
t
r
a
n
s
i
t
r
o
u
t
i
n
g
o
p
t
i
o
n
s
.
Ye
s
Y
e
s
P
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
P
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
M
e
d
i
u
m
to
H
i
g
h
No
E
f
f
e
c
t
Di
v
e
r
t
e
r
El
i
m
i
n
a
t
e
s
c
u
t
-
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
.
Re
d
u
c
e
c
o
n
f
l
i
c
t
s
a
t
i
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
.
Pr
o
v
i
d
e
s
a
r
e
a
f
o
r
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
i
n
g
.
In
c
r
e
a
s
e
s
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
s
a
f
e
t
y
.
Pe
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
a
n
d
b
i
k
e
a
c
c
e
s
s
c
a
n
b
e
ma
i
n
t
a
i
n
e
d
.
Ma
y
r
e
d
i
r
e
c
t
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
o
n
t
o
o
t
h
e
r
l
o
c
a
l
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
.
In
c
r
e
a
s
e
d
t
r
a
v
e
l
t
i
m
e
f
o
r
l
o
c
a
l
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
.
Re
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
i
n
v
o
l
u
m
e
m
a
y
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
s
p
e
e
d
s
.
Re
d
u
c
e
s
e
m
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
v
e
h
i
c
l
e
s
’
a
c
c
e
s
s
u
n
l
e
s
s
sp
e
c
i
a
l
l
y
d
e
s
i
g
n
e
d
.
In
c
r
e
a
s
e
d
m
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
c
o
s
t
s
f
o
r
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
i
n
g
.
Ye
s
P
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
Y
e
s
Y
e
s
M
e
d
i
u
m
to
H
i
g
h
Po
s
s
i
b
l
e
Pr
o
b
l
e
m
s
Fu
l
l
C
l
o
s
u
r
e
El
i
m
i
n
a
t
e
s
c
u
t
-
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
.
Ef
f
e
c
t
i
v
e
v
o
l
u
m
e
c
o
n
t
r
o
l
m
e
a
s
u
r
e
.
Im
p
r
o
v
e
s
a
e
s
t
h
e
t
i
c
q
u
a
l
i
t
y
o
f
t
h
e
st
r
e
e
t
.
Pe
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
a
n
d
b
i
k
e
a
c
c
e
s
s
c
a
n
b
e
ma
i
n
t
a
i
n
e
d
.
Im
p
r
o
v
e
s
s
a
f
e
t
y
f
o
r
a
l
l
t
h
e
s
t
r
e
e
t
us
e
r
s
.
Ma
y
r
e
d
i
r
e
c
t
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
t
o
o
t
h
e
r
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
.
Ma
y
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
t
r
i
p
l
e
n
g
t
h
f
o
r
l
o
c
a
l
d
r
i
v
e
r
s
.
No
t
a
p
p
l
i
c
a
b
l
e
f
o
r
d
e
s
i
g
n
a
t
e
d
e
m
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
re
s
p
o
n
s
e
v
e
h
i
c
l
e
r
o
u
t
e
s
.
Ma
y
r
e
s
u
l
t
i
n
d
i
f
f
i
c
u
l
t
t
u
r
n
a
r
o
u
n
d
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
.
In
c
r
e
a
s
e
d
m
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
c
o
s
t
s
f
o
r
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
i
n
g
.
Ye
s
Y
e
s
Y
e
s
Y
e
s
L
o
w
t
o
Me
d
i
u
m
Po
s
s
i
b
l
e
Pr
o
b
l
e
m
s
Me
d
i
a
n
s
Na
r
r
o
w
e
d
l
a
n
e
s
c
a
n
s
l
o
w
v
e
h
i
c
l
e
s
.
Pr
e
v
e
n
t
s
p
a
s
s
i
n
g
.
Op
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
y
f
o
r
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
i
n
g
a
n
d
vi
s
u
a
l
e
n
h
a
n
c
e
m
e
n
t
.
Se
p
a
r
a
t
e
s
o
p
p
o
s
i
n
g
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
.
Ma
y
r
e
d
u
c
e
s
i
g
h
t
l
i
n
e
s
i
f
o
v
e
r
-
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
e
d
.
Ma
y
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
r
e
m
o
v
a
l
o
f
s
o
m
e
o
n
-
s
t
r
e
e
t
pa
r
k
i
n
g
.
Ma
y
p
r
o
h
i
b
i
t
o
r
l
i
m
i
t
d
r
i
v
e
w
a
y
a
c
c
e
s
s
.
Ma
y
a
f
f
e
c
t
e
m
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
r
e
s
p
o
n
s
e
d
u
r
i
n
g
in
c
l
e
m
e
n
t
w
e
a
t
h
e
r
,
i
f
i
n
s
t
a
l
l
e
d
o
n
a
g
r
a
d
e
.
Ma
y
l
i
m
i
t
m
a
r
k
e
d
b
i
c
y
c
l
e
l
a
n
e
s
.
In
c
r
e
a
s
e
d
m
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
f
o
r
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
i
n
g
,
st
r
e
e
t
s
w
e
e
p
i
n
g
,
a
n
d
c
u
r
b
r
e
p
a
i
r
.
Sl
i
g
h
t
P
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
S
l
i
g
h
t
S
l
i
g
h
t
M
e
d
i
u
m
to
H
i
g
h
Po
s
s
i
b
l
e
Pr
o
b
l
e
m
s
Packet Page 868 of 930
Po
s
s
i
b
l
e
So
l
u
t
i
o
n
A
d
v
a
n
t
a
g
e
D
i
s
a
d
v
a
n
t
a
g
e
Sa
f
e
t
y
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
Sp
e
e
d
Re
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
Vo
l
u
m
e
Re
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
Cu
t
-
th
r
o
u
g
h
Tr
a
f
f
i
c
Re
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
C
o
s
t
Em
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
Se
r
v
i
c
e
Pa
r
t
i
a
l
Cl
o
s
u
r
e
Re
d
u
c
e
s
c
u
t
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
.
Pe
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
c
r
o
s
s
i
n
g
d
i
s
t
a
n
c
e
re
d
u
c
e
d
.
La
n
d
s
c
a
p
i
n
g
o
p
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
y
.
Ma
y
a
f
f
e
c
t
e
m
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
r
e
s
p
o
n
s
e
.
Ma
y
r
e
d
i
r
e
c
t
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
o
n
t
o
o
t
h
e
r
l
o
c
a
l
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
.
Ma
y
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
t
r
i
p
l
e
n
g
t
h
f
o
r
l
o
c
a
l
d
r
i
v
e
r
s
.
Ma
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
r
e
s
p
o
n
s
i
b
i
l
i
t
y
i
f
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
e
d
.
Ye
s
P
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
Y
e
s
Y
e
s
L
o
w
t
o
Me
d
i
u
m
Po
s
s
i
b
l
e
Pr
o
b
l
e
m
s
Sp
e
e
d
Cu
s
h
i
o
n
s
Re
d
u
c
e
s
v
e
h
i
c
l
e
s
p
e
e
d
s
i
n
t
h
e
vi
c
i
n
i
t
y
o
f
s
p
e
e
d
c
u
s
h
i
o
n
.
.
Se
l
f
-
e
n
f
o
r
c
i
n
g
.
Re
l
a
t
i
v
e
l
y
i
n
e
x
p
e
n
s
i
v
e
.
Ma
y
d
i
v
e
r
t
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
i
f
a
d
j
a
c
e
n
t
a
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
st
r
e
e
t
e
x
i
s
t
s
.
Ma
y
c
r
e
a
t
e
n
o
i
s
e
.
In
c
r
e
a
s
e
s
s
i
g
n
m
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
c
o
s
t
s
.
Ma
y
c
a
u
s
e
d
i
v
e
r
s
i
o
n
o
f
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
t
o
a
d
j
a
c
e
n
t
l
o
c
a
l
st
r
e
e
t
s
.
Po
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
Y
e
s
Y
e
s
P
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
L
o
w
t
o
Me
d
i
u
m
Le
s
s
E
f
f
e
c
t
Tr
a
f
f
i
c
Ci
r
c
l
e
s
Sp
e
e
d
r
e
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
n
e
a
r
i
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
.
Ma
y
d
i
v
e
r
t
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
i
f
a
d
j
a
c
e
n
t
a
n
ar
t
e
r
i
a
l
s
t
r
e
e
t
e
x
i
s
t
s
.
Op
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
y
f
o
r
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
i
n
g
a
n
d
be
a
u
t
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
.
Ma
y
r
e
d
u
c
e
c
o
l
l
i
s
i
o
n
s
a
t
t
h
e
in
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
.
Ma
y
a
f
f
e
c
t
e
m
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
r
e
s
p
o
n
s
e
.
Ma
y
c
a
u
s
e
d
i
v
e
r
s
i
o
n
o
f
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
t
o
a
d
j
a
c
e
n
t
l
o
c
a
l
st
r
e
e
t
s
.
Ma
y
a
f
f
e
c
t
t
r
a
n
s
i
t
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
.
So
m
e
p
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
l
o
s
s
o
f
o
n
-
s
t
r
e
e
t
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
a
t
co
r
n
e
r
s
.
In
c
r
e
a
s
e
d
m
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
f
o
r
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
i
n
g
,
st
r
e
e
t
s
w
e
e
p
i
n
g
,
a
n
d
c
u
r
b
r
e
p
a
i
r
.
Ye
s
Y
e
s
P
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
P
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
L
o
w
to
Hi
g
h
Mi
n
o
r
Co
n
s
t
r
a
i
n
t
s
Sp
e
e
d
h
u
m
p
s
a
n
d
c
h
i
c
a
n
e
s
a
r
e
n
o
t
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
e
d
a
s
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
c
a
l
m
i
n
g
d
e
v
i
c
e
s
i
n
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
a
s
t
h
e
y
c
a
u
s
e
a
d
d
e
d
r
e
s
p
o
n
s
e
d
e
l
a
y
t
i
m
e
d
u
r
i
n
g
e
m
e
r
g
e
n
c
i
e
s
a
n
d
t
h
e
y
a
r
e
d
i
f
f
i
c
u
l
t
t
o
m
a
n
e
u
v
e
r
a
r
o
u
n
d
.
Packet Page 869 of 930
Removal of a Traffic Calming Device
If the device is determined to be a safety issue, the device will be removed immediately by the City at no
cost to the residents. If the device is determined to be ineffective, it may be removed by the City if it
conflicts with the installation of future traffic control devices at no cost to the residents. However, if
residents wish to remove a traffic calming device after it is installed following the steps of this program,
residents shall be petitioned for 60% agreement, and residents shall pay for the removal.
Packet Page 870 of 930
Packet Page 871 of 930
Appendix C
ADA Ramp Inventory and Upgrade Priority
Packet Page 872 of 930
Packet Page 873 of 930
Ci
t
y
o
f
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
,
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
AD
A
R
a
m
p
I
n
v
e
n
t
o
r
y
Cr
i
t
.
2
C
r
i
t
e
r
i
a
3
Cr
i
t
e
r
i
a
4
Cr
i
t
e
r
i
a
5
Cr
i
t
e
r
i
a
6
ID
N
o
.
I
N
T
E
R
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
C
O
R
N
E
R
(
S
)
S
t
r
e
e
t
A
C
l
a
s
s
.
1
S
t
r
e
e
t
B
C
l
a
s
s
1
C
o
m
m
.
C
e
n
t
e
r
&
L
i
b
r
a
r
y
S
e
n
i
o
r
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
H
o
s
p
i
t
a
l
B
R
T
/
R
a
i
l
/
F
e
r
r
y
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
R
o
u
t
e
A
d
j
a
c
e
n
t
S
c
h
o
o
l
S
c
h
o
o
l
N
e
a
r
b
y
C
i
t
y
H
a
l
l
/
P
o
l
i
c
e
D
e
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
C
o
m
m
.
Z
o
n
e
A
d
j
a
c
e
n
t
P
a
r
k
P
a
r
k
N
e
a
r
b
y
N
o
R
a
m
p
S
u
b
-
S
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
R
a
m
p
S
u
b
-
S
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
A
s
p
h
a
l
t
R
a
m
p
N
e
w
R
a
m
p
,
W
i
t
h
o
u
t
D
o
m
e
s
A
s
p
h
a
l
t
R
a
m
p
,
N
o
D
o
m
e
s
N
e
w
R
a
m
p
,
W
i
t
h
D
o
m
e
s
D
O
W
N
T
O
W
N
E
D
M
O
N
D
S
3
AD
A
1
8
8
Ma
i
n
&
S
u
n
s
e
t
AL
L
12
X
X
X
AD
A
1
9
0
D
a
y
t
o
n
&
S
u
n
s
e
t
AL
L
13
X
X
X
AD
A
2
7
9
SR
-
1
0
4
&
D
a
y
t
o
n
D
U
P
L
I
C
A
T
E
13
X
X
X
AD
A
1
0
9
3r
d
&
M
a
i
n
AL
L
22
X
X
X
AD
A
1
8
6
Ma
i
n
&
3
r
d
DU
P
L
I
C
A
T
E
22
X
X
X
AD
A
1
5t
h
&
M
a
i
n
AL
L
22
X
X
X
AD
A
2
5t
h
&
D
a
y to
n
2
AL
L
23
X
X
X
X
AD
A
1
8
3
M
a
i
n
&
D
u
r
b
i
n
AL
L
24
X
X
X
X
X
AD
A
1
8
4
Ma
i
n
&
6
t
h
AL
L
24
X
X
X
X
AD
A
1
0
6
3
r
d
&
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
AL
L
24
X
X
X
AD
A
1
1
0
3r
d
&
J
a
m
e
s
AL
L
24
X
X
X
AD
A
1
0
8
3r
d
&
B
e
l
l
NW
,
S
E
,
S
W
24
X
X
X
AD
A
1
0
7
3r
d
&
B
e
l
l
NE
24
X
X
X
AD
A
1
8
5
Ma
i
n
&
4
t
h
AL
L
24
X
X
AD
A
1
8
7
Ma
i
n
&
2
n
d
AL
L
24
X
X
AD
A
1
1
1
3r
d
&
D
a
y
t
o
n
AL
L
33
X
X
X
AD
A
1
9
2
Da
y
t
o
n
&
3
r
d
D
U
P
L
I
C
A
T
E
33
X
X
X
AD
A
1
8
9
D
a
y
t
o
n
&
R
a
i
l
r
o
a
d
N
W
,
N
E
34
X
X
X
X
X
AD
A
2
7
5
Da
y
t
o
n
&
R
a
i
l
r
o
a
d
D
U
P
L
I
C
A
T
E
34
X
X
X
X
X
AD
A
1
9
1
D
a
y
t
o
n
&
2
n
d
AL
L
34
X
X
X
AD
A
1
9
3
Da
y
t
o
n
&
4
t
h
AL
L
34
X
X
X
AD
A
1
9
5
Da
y
t
o
n
&
6
t
h
SE
,
S
W
,
N
E
34
X
X
X
AD
A
1
9
4
Da
y
t
o
n
&
6
t
h
NW
34
X
X
X
AD
A
1
9
9
Be
l
l
&
6
t
h
AL
L
44
X
X
X
X
AD
A
1
9
8
Be
l
l
&
5
t
h
AL
L
44
X
X
X
AD
A
2
7
3
2n
d
&
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
SE
,
S
W
44
X
X
AD
A
2
7
4
2n
d
&
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
NE
,
N
W
44
X
X
AD
A
1
9
7
Be
l
l
&
2
n
d
AL
L
44
X
X
AD
A
2
0
2
B
e
l
l
&
S
u
n
s
e
t
SE
44
X
X
AD
A
2
6
5
4
t
h
&
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
AL
L
44
X
X
AD
A
2
7
2
2n
d
&
J
a
m
e
s
SE
,
N
W
44
X
X
AD
A
2
7
1
2n
d
&
J
a
m
e
s
NE
,
S
W
44
X
X
AD
A
2
6
3
4t
h
&
B
e
l
l
SW
,
N
E
,
S
E
44
X
X
AD
A
2
6
4
4t
h
&
B
e
l
l
NW
44
X
X
D
O
W
N
T
O
W
N
E
D
M
O
N
D
S
3
Se
e
P
a
g
e
1
2
f
o
r
N
o
t
e
s
1
-
3
K:
\
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
\
3
1
1
0
0
\
3
1
1
6
1
\
D
a
t
a
\
R
a
m
p
s
\
R
a
m
p
-
2
0
0
9
_
0
2
2
4
.
x
l
s
Sh
e
e
t
1
Pa
g
e
1
o
f
1
2
Ot
a
k
,
I
n
c
.
Pr
i
n
t
e
d
:
4
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
9
Packet Page 874 of 930
Ci
t
y
o
f
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
,
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
AD
A
R
a
m
p
I
n
v
e
n
t
o
r
y
Cr
i
t
.
2
C
r
i
t
e
r
i
a
3
Cr
i
t
e
r
i
a
4
Cr
i
t
e
r
i
a
5
Cr
i
t
e
r
i
a
6
ID
N
o
.
I
N
T
E
R
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
C
O
R
N
E
R
(
S
)
S
t
r
e
e
t
A
C
l
a
s
s
.
1
S
t
r
e
e
t
B
C
l
a
s
s
1
C
o
m
m
.
C
e
n
t
e
r
&
L
i
b
r
a
r
y
S
e
n
i
o
r
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
H
o
s
p
i
t
a
l
B
R
T
/
R
a
i
l
/
F
e
r
r
y
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
R
o
u
t
e
A
d
j
a
c
e
n
t
S
c
h
o
o
l
S
c
h
o
o
l
N
e
a
r
b
y
C
i
t
y
H
a
l
l
/
P
o
l
i
c
e
D
e
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
C
o
m
m
.
Z
o
n
e
A
d
j
a
c
e
n
t
P
a
r
k
P
a
r
k
N
e
a
r
b
y
N
o
R
a
m
p
S
u
b
-
S
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
R
a
m
p
S
u
b
-
S
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
A
s
p
h
a
l
t
R
a
m
p
N
e
w
R
a
m
p
,
W
i
t
h
o
u
t
D
o
m
e
s
A
s
p
h
a
l
t
R
a
m
p
,
N
o
D
o
m
e
s
N
e
w
R
a
m
p
,
W
i
t
h
D
o
m
e
s
AD
A
3
0
5
SR
-
9
9
&
2
4
4
t
h
N
W
,
N
E
11
X
X
X
AD
A
2
8
3
SR
-
1
0
4
&
9
t
h
A
v
e
/
1
0
0
t
h
A
L
L
12
X
X
X
X
AD
A
2
9
4
SR
-
9
9
&
2
1
2
n
d
NW
,
S
W
12
X
X
X
AD
A
2
9
7
SR
-
9
9
&
2
2
0
t
h
NW
,
N
E
12
X
X
X
AD
A
2
9
6
SR
-
9
9
&
2
2
0
t
h
SW
12
X
X
X
AD
A
3
0
3
SR
-
9
9
&
2
3
8
t
h
AL
L
12
X
X
X
AD
A
2
9
3
SR
-
9
9
&
7
6
t
h
A
v
e
W
2
AL
L
12
X
X
X
AD
A
7
1
76
t
h
&
1
9
6
t
h
AL
L
12
X
X
AD
A
2
8
8
SR
-
1
0
4
&
2
3
8
t
h
AL
L
12
X
X
AD
A
2
9
9
SR
-
9
9
&
2
2
8
t
h
AL
L
13
X
X
X
AD
A
2
8
4
SR
-
1
0
4
&
9
5
t
h
NW
,
N
E
13
X
X
AD
A
2
8
7
SR
-
1
0
4
&
2
3
6
t
h
AL
L
1
4
XX
X
X
AD
A
2
8
2
SR
-
1
0
4
&
1
0
2
n
d
AL
L
14
X
X
X
X
AD
A
2
8
1
SR
-
1
0
4
&
2
2
6
t
h
AL
L
14
X
X
X
AD
A
2
8
5
SR
-
1
0
4
&
9
7
t
h
SW
,
S
W
14
X
X
X
AD
A
2
9
5
SR
-
9
9
&
2
1
6
t
h
NW
,
S
W
14
X
X
X
AD
A
2
9
8
SR
-
9
9
&
2
2
4
t
h
AL
L
14
X
X
X
AD
A
3
0
2
SR
-
9
9
&
2
3
6
t
h
AL
L
14
X
X
X
AD
A
3
0
4
SR
-
9
9
&
2
4
0
t
h
NW
,
N
E
14
X
X
X
AD
A
3
0
0
SR
-
9
9
&
2
3
2
n
d
N
W
,
N
E
,
S
W
14
X
X
X
AD
A
3
0
1
SR
-
9
9
&
2
3
2
n
d
SE
14
X
X
X
AD
A
2
8
0
SR
-
1
0
4
&
P
a
r
a
d
i
s
e
L
a
n
e
N
W
,
N
E
14
X
X
AD
A
2
8
6
SR
-
1
0
4
&
2
3
2
n
d
AL
L
14
X
X
AD
A
2
9
0
SR
-
1
0
4
&
2
4
0
t
h
NW
,
S
W
14
X
AD
A
2
8
9
SR
-
1
0
4
&
2
4
0
t
h
NE
,
S
E
1
4
X
P
R
I
N
C
I
P
A
L
A
R
T
E
R
I
A
L
S
Se
e
P
a
g
e
1
2
f
o
r
N
o
t
e
s
1
-
3
K:
\
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
\
3
1
1
0
0
\
3
1
1
6
1
\
D
a
t
a
\
R
a
m
p
s
\
R
a
m
p
-
2
0
0
9
_
0
2
2
4
.
x
l
s
Sh
e
e
t
1
Pa
g
e
2
o
f
1
2
Ot
a
k
,
I
n
c
.
Pr
i
n
t
e
d
:
4
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
9
Packet Page 875 of 930
Ci
t
y
o
f
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
,
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
AD
A
R
a
m
p
I
n
v
e
n
t
o
r
y
Cr
i
t
.
2
C
r
i
t
e
r
i
a
3
Cr
i
t
e
r
i
a
4
Cr
i
t
e
r
i
a
5
Cr
i
t
e
r
i
a
6
ID
N
o
.
I
N
T
E
R
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
C
O
R
N
E
R
(
S
)
S
t
r
e
e
t
A
C
l
a
s
s
.
1
S
t
r
e
e
t
B
C
l
a
s
s
1
C
o
m
m
.
C
e
n
t
e
r
&
L
i
b
r
a
r
y
S
e
n
i
o
r
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
H
o
s
p
i
t
a
l
B
R
T
/
R
a
i
l
/
F
e
r
r
y
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
R
o
u
t
e
A
d
j
a
c
e
n
t
S
c
h
o
o
l
S
c
h
o
o
l
N
e
a
r
b
y
C
i
t
y
H
a
l
l
/
P
o
l
i
c
e
D
e
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
C
o
m
m
.
Z
o
n
e
A
d
j
a
c
e
n
t
P
a
r
k
P
a
r
k
N
e
a
r
b
y
N
o
R
a
m
p
S
u
b
-
S
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
R
a
m
p
S
u
b
-
S
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
A
s
p
h
a
l
t
R
a
m
p
N
e
w
R
a
m
p
,
W
i
t
h
o
u
t
D
o
m
e
s
A
s
p
h
a
l
t
R
a
m
p
,
N
o
D
o
m
e
s
N
e
w
R
a
m
p
,
W
i
t
h
D
o
m
e
s
AD
A
1
6
5
21
2
t
h
&
7
6
t
h
AL
L
2
2
XX
X
X
X
AD
A
5
7
21
2
t
h
&
7
6
t
h
DU
P
L
I
C
A
T
E
2
2
XX
X
X
X
AD
A
4
9
76
t
h
&
2
2
8
t
h
NE
,
S
E
22
X
X
X
AD
A
9
5
19
6
t
h
&
O
l
y m p ic
4
SE
,
S
W
22
X
X
X
X
AD
A
9
4
19
6
t
h
&
O
l
y m p ic
2
NE
,
N
W
22
X
X
X
X
AD
A
3
6
22
0
t
h
&
7
6
t
h
SE
,
S
W
22
X
X
X
AD
A
3
5
22
0
t
h
&
7
6
t
h
NE
,
N
W
22
X
X
X
AD
A
1
7
9
Ma
i
n
&
9
t
h
AL
L
22
X
X
X
AD
A
1
0
1
3r
d
&
C
a
s
p er
s
2
NW
,
S
W
22
X
X
AD
A
1
7
22
0
t
h
&
9
t
h
AL
L
22
X
X
AD
A
1
3
4
22
0
t
h
&
9
t
h
DU
P
L
I
C
A
T
E
22
X
X
AD
A
7
7
76
t
h
&
O
l
y
m
p
i
c
V
i
e
w
D
r
N
W
,
S
E
22
X
X
X
AD
A
7
8
7
6
t
h
&
O
l
y
m
p
i
c
V
i
e
w
D
r
S
W
22
X
X
X
AD
A
7
9
7
6
t
h
&
O
l
y
m
p
i
c
V
i
e
w
D
r
N
E
22
X
X
X
AD
A
1
8
2
Ma
i
n
&
7
t
h
SW
,
N
W
,
N
E
23
X
X
X
X
AD
A
1
8
1
Ma
i
n
&
7
t
h
SE
23
X
X
X
X
AD
A
9
6
19
6
t
h
&
O
l
y m p ic
V
i
e
w
D
r
2
SW
,
N
E
,
N
W
2
3
X
X
X
X
X
AD
A
6
0
76
t
h
&
2
0
8
t
h
S
W
,
N
W
,
N
E
2
3
XX
X
X
AD
A
2
1
22
0
t
h
&
9
6
t
h
AL
L
2
3
XX
X
X
AD
A
9
7
19
6
t
h
&
9
t
h
2
AL
L
23
X
X
X
X
AD
A
6
8
76
t
h
&
2
0
0
t
h
AL
L
23
X
X
X
AD
A
2
2
22
0
t
h
&
9
5
t
h
AL
L
23
X
X
X
AD
A
2
9
22
0
t
h
&
8
4
t
h
AL
L
23
X
X
X
AD
A
9
0
19
6
t
h
&
8
8
t
h
NW
,
S
E
23
X
X
X
AD
A
1
7
1
5
C
o
r
n
e
r
s
AL
L
23
X
X
X
AD
A
1
9
6
D
a
y
t
o
n
&
9
t
h
AL
L
23
X
X
X
AD
A
1
7
6
M
a
i
n
&
M
a
p
l
e
w
o
o
d
AL
L
23
X
X
X
AD
A
9
1
19
6
t
h
&
8
8
t
h
NE
23
X
X
X
AD
A
1
1
8
9t
h
&
D
a
y
t
o
n
AL
L
23
X
AD
A
1
2
1
9t
h
&
W
a
l
n
u
t
AL
L
23
X
AD
A
8
5
19
6
t
h
&
8
0
t
h
AL
L
23
X
AD
A
1
8
0
Ma
i
n
&
8
t
h
AL
L
24
X
X
XX
X
AD
A
5
5
76
t
h
&
2
1
6
t
h
AL
L
2
4
X
X
X
X
X
AD
A
5
4
76
t
h
&
2
1
8
t
h
AL
L
24
X
X
X
X
X
AD
A
6
1
76
t
h
&
2
0
6
t
h
NE
,
N
W
2
4
XX
X
X
AD
A
6
2
76
t
h
&
2
0
4
t
h
AL
L
2
4
XX
X
X
A DA
1
4
4
10
0
t
h
&
2
3
2
n
d
NE
,
S
E
24
X
X
X
X
AD
A
1
4
5
1
0
0
t
h
&
2
3
4
t
h
AL
L
2
4
XX
X
X
AD
A
1
6
6
21
2
t
h
&
7
7
t
h
AL
L
24
X
X
X
X
M
I
N
O
R
A
R
T
E
R
I
A
L
S
Se
e
P
a
g
e
1
2
f
o
r
N
o
t
e
s
1
-
3
K:
\
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
\
3
1
1
0
0
\
3
1
1
6
1
\
D
a
t
a
\
R
a
m
p
s
\
R
a
m
p
-
2
0
0
9
_
0
2
2
4
.
x
l
s
Sh
e
e
t
1
Pa
g
e
3
o
f
1
2
Ot
a
k
,
I
n
c
.
Pr
i
n
t
e
d
:
4
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
9
Packet Page 876 of 930
Ci
t
y
o
f
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
,
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
AD
A
R
a
m
p
I
n
v
e
n
t
o
r
y
Cr
i
t
.
2
C
r
i
t
e
r
i
a
3
Cr
i
t
e
r
i
a
4
Cr
i
t
e
r
i
a
5
Cr
i
t
e
r
i
a
6
ID
N
o
.
I
N
T
E
R
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
C
O
R
N
E
R
(
S
)
S
t
r
e
e
t
A
C
l
a
s
s
.
1
S
t
r
e
e
t
B
C
l
a
s
s
1
C
o
m
m
.
C
e
n
t
e
r
&
L
i
b
r
a
r
y
S
e
n
i
o
r
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
H
o
s
p
i
t
a
l
B
R
T
/
R
a
i
l
/
F
e
r
r
y
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
R
o
u
t
e
A
d
j
a
c
e
n
t
S
c
h
o
o
l
S
c
h
o
o
l
N
e
a
r
b
y
C
i
t
y
H
a
l
l
/
P
o
l
i
c
e
D
e
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
C
o
m
m
.
Z
o
n
e
A
d
j
a
c
e
n
t
P
a
r
k
P
a
r
k
N
e
a
r
b
y
N
o
R
a
m
p
S
u
b
-
S
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
R
a
m
p
S
u
b
-
S
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
A
s
p
h
a
l
t
R
a
m
p
N
e
w
R
a
m
p
,
W
i
t
h
o
u
t
D
o
m
e
s
A
s
p
h
a
l
t
R
a
m
p
,
N
o
D
o
m
e
s
N
e
w
R
a
m
p
,
W
i
t
h
D
o
m
e
s
AD
A
1
6
7
21
2
t
h
&
7
8
t
h
NW
,
N
E
2
4
XX
X
X
AD
A
5
6
76
t
h
&
2
1
4
t
h
NE
,
S
E
2
4
XX
X
X
AD
A
1
6
3
2
1
2
t
h
&
7
2
n
d
AL
L
24
X
X
X
X
AD
A
1
6
4
21
2
t
h
&
7
4
t
h
NW
,
N
E
24
X
X
X
X
AD
A
9
2
19
6
t
h
&
1
2
t
h
SW
,
S
E
24
X
X
X
X
AD
A
9
3
19
6
t
h
&
1
1
t
h
SW
,
S
E
24
X
X
X
X
AD
A
1
9
22
0
t
h
&
9
8
t
h
P
l
a
c
e
W
S
W
,
S
W
24
XX
X
AD
A
2
0
22
0
t
h
&
9
8
t
h
A
v
e
W
AL
L
24
XX
X
AD
A
1
4
1
9t
h
&
P
u
g et
W
a
y
2
AL
L
24
X
X
X
X
AD
A
1
4
6
1
0
0
t
h
&
2
3
5
t
h
NE
,
S
E
24
X
X
X
AD
A
6
3
76
t
h
&
2
0
3
r
d
NW
,
S
W
24
X
X
X
AD
A
6
5
76
t
h
&
2
0
2
n
d
NE
,
S
E
24
X
X
X
AD
A
6
4
76
t
h
&
2
0
2
n
d
NW
,
S
W
24
X
X
X
AD
A
5
9
76
t
h
&
2
1
0
t
h
SE
24
X
X
X
AD
A
5
8
76
t
h
&
2
1
0
t
h
NE
24
X
X
X
AD
A
6
7
76
t
h
&
2
0
1
s
t
NE
,
S
E
24
X
X
X
AD
A
6
6
76
t
h
&
2
0
1
s
t
NW
,
S
W
24
X
X
X
AD
A
1
6
8
21
2
t
h
&
8
0
t
h
AL
L
24
X
X
X
AD
A
1
6
9
21
2
t
h
&
8
1
s
t
NW
,
N
E
24
X
X
X
AD
A
2
3
22
0
t
h
&
9
3
r
d
AL
L
24
X
X
X
AD
A
1
4
7
1
0
0
t
h
&
2
3
7
t
h
NE
,
S
E
24
X
X
AD
A
3
9
76
t
h
&
2
4
2
n
d
NE
24
X
X
X
X
AD
A
3
8
76
t
h
&
2
4
2
n
d
SE
24
X
X
X
X
AD
A
3
7
76
t
h
&
2
4
2
n
d
NW
,
S
W
24
X
X
X
X
AD
A
1
7
7
Ma
i
n
&
1
2
t
h
AL
L
24
X
XX
X
AD
A
1
7
8
M
a
i
n
&
O
l
y
m
p
i
c
AL
L
24
X
XX
X
AD
A
1
1
5t
h
&
H
o
m
e
l
a
n
d
AL
L
24
X
X
X
AD
A
5
2
76
t
h
&
2
2
2
t
h
NW
,
S
W
24
X
X
X
AD
A
5
3
76
t
h
&
2
2
1
s
t
NE
,
S
E
24
X
X
X
AD
A
4
0
76
t
h
&
2
4
1
s
t
AL
L
24
X
X
X
A DA
4
2
76
t
h
&
M
c
A
l
e
e
r
NE
,
S
E
24
X
X
X
AD
A
3
5t
h
&
M
a
p
l
e
N
E
,
S
E
,
N
W
24
X
X
X
AD
A
4
5t
h
&
A
l
d
e
r
NE
,
S
E
24
X
X
X
AD
A
1
0
5t
h
&
H
o
w
e
l
l
W
a
y
AL
L
24
X
X
X
AD
A
1
2
5t
h
&
H
e
m
l
o
c
k
W
a
y
AL
L
24
X
X
X
AD
A
5
0
76
t
h
&
2
2
4
t
h
AL
L
24
X
X
X
AD
A
5
1
76
t
h
&
2
2
3
r
d
NW
,
S
W
24
X
X
X
AD
A
1
0
4
3r
d
&
4
t
h
NE
,
S
E
24
X
X
X
M
I
N
O
R
A
R
T
E
R
I
A
L
S
Se
e
P
a
g
e
1
2
f
o
r
N
o
t
e
s
1
-
3
K:
\
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
\
3
1
1
0
0
\
3
1
1
6
1
\
D
a
t
a
\
R
a
m
p
s
\
R
a
m
p
-
2
0
0
9
_
0
2
2
4
.
x
l
s
Sh
e
e
t
1
Pa
g
e
4
o
f
1
2
Ot
a
k
,
I
n
c
.
Pr
i
n
t
e
d
:
4
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
9
Packet Page 877 of 930
Ci
t
y
o
f
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
,
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
AD
A
R
a
m
p
I
n
v
e
n
t
o
r
y
Cr
i
t
.
2
C
r
i
t
e
r
i
a
3
Cr
i
t
e
r
i
a
4
Cr
i
t
e
r
i
a
5
Cr
i
t
e
r
i
a
6
ID
N
o
.
I
N
T
E
R
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
C
O
R
N
E
R
(
S
)
S
t
r
e
e
t
A
C
l
a
s
s
.
1
S
t
r
e
e
t
B
C
l
a
s
s
1
C
o
m
m
.
C
e
n
t
e
r
&
L
i
b
r
a
r
y
S
e
n
i
o
r
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
H
o
s
p
i
t
a
l
B
R
T
/
R
a
i
l
/
F
e
r
r
y
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
R
o
u
t
e
A
d
j
a
c
e
n
t
S
c
h
o
o
l
S
c
h
o
o
l
N
e
a
r
b
y
C
i
t
y
H
a
l
l
/
P
o
l
i
c
e
D
e
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
C
o
m
m
.
Z
o
n
e
A
d
j
a
c
e
n
t
P
a
r
k
P
a
r
k
N
e
a
r
b
y
N
o
R
a
m
p
S
u
b
-
S
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
R
a
m
p
S
u
b
-
S
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
A
s
p
h
a
l
t
R
a
m
p
N
e
w
R
a
m
p
,
W
i
t
h
o
u
t
D
o
m
e
s
A
s
p
h
a
l
t
R
a
m
p
,
N
o
D
o
m
e
s
N
e
w
R
a
m
p
,
W
i
t
h
D
o
m
e
s
AD
A
1
6
2
21
2
t
h
&
7
0
t
h
N
W
,
N
E
24
X
X
X
AD
A
1
4
5t
h
&
P
i
n
e
AL
L
24
X
X
X
AD
A
1
5
5t
h
&
F
o
r
s
y
t
h
L
a
n
e
N
E
,
S
E
24
X
X
X
AD
A
1
7
3
Ma
i
n
&
8
6
t
h
AL
L
24
X
X
X
AD
A
1
7
5
M
a
i
n
&
H
i
l
l
c
r
e
s
t
AL
L
24
X
X
X
AD
A
6
5t
h
&
W
a
l
n
u
t
N
W
,
N
E
,
S
W
24
X
X
X
AD
A
5
5t
h
&
W
a
l
n
u
t
SE
24
X
X
X
AD
A
9
5t
h
&
H
o
l
l
y
D
r
SW
24
X
X
X
AD
A
8
5t
h
&
H
o
l
l
y
D
r
NW
,
S
E
24
X
X
X
AD
A
7
5t
h
&
H
o
l
l
y
D
r
NE
24
X
X
X
AD
A
4
1
76
t
h
&
2
3
9
t
h
NW
,
S
W
24
X
X
X
AD
A
4
3
76
t
h
&
2
3
8
t
h
NW
,
S
W
24
X
X
X
AD
A
4
4
76
t
h
&
2
3
6
t
h
AL
L
24
X
X
AD
A
4
5
76
t
h
&
2
3
4
t
h
NW
,
S
W
24
X
X
AD
A
4
7
76
t
h
&
2
3
2
n
d
SW
24
X
X
AD
A
7
2
76
t
h
&
1
9
5
t
h
AL
L
24
X
X
AD
A
1
3
5t
h
&
S
e
a
m
o
n
t
AL
L
24
X
X
AD
A
1
6
5t
h
&
E
l
m
W
a
y
NE
,
S
E
24
X
X
AD
A
3
0
22
0
t
h
&
8
3
r
d
NW
,
N
E
24
X
X
AD
A
3
1
22
0
t
h
&
8
2
n
d
NW
,
N
E
24
X
X
AD
A
3
2
22
0
t
h
&
8
0
t
h
AL
L
24
X
X
AD
A
3
3
22
0
t
h
&
7
8
t
h
SW
,
S
E
24
X
X
AD
A
3
4
22
0
t
h
&
7
7
t
h
SW
,
S
E
24
X
X
AD
A
4
6
76
t
h
&
2
3
2
n
d
NW
24
X
X
AD
A
6
9
76
t
h
&
1
9
9
t
h
NW
,
S
W
24
X
X
AD
A
7
0
76
t
h
&
1
9
8
t
h
NE
,
S
E
24
X
X
AD
A
1
0
2
3r
d
&
G
i
l
t
n
e
r
NE
,
S
E
24
X
X
AD
A
1
7
2
M
a
i
n
&
2
1
0
t
h
AL
L
24
X
X
AD
A
1
7
0
2
1
2
t
h
&
8
2
n
d
SW
,
S
E
24
X
X
AD
A
1
7
4
Ma
i
n
&
8
8
t
h
AL
L
24
X
X
AD
A
1
0
3
3r
d
&
S
a
t
e
r
NE
,
S
E
24
X
X
AD
A
2
4
22
0
t
h
&
9
2
n
d
AL
L
24
X
X
AD
A
2
5
22
0
t
h
&
9
0
t
h
SW
,
S
E
24
X
X
AD
A
2
6
22
0
&
8
8
t
h
P
l
a
c
e
NW
,
N
E
24
X
X
AD
A
2
7
22
0
t
h
&
8
8
t
h
A
v
e
AL
L
24
X
X
AD
A
2
8
22
0
t
h
&
8
6
t
h
NW
,
N
E
24
X
X
AD
A
4
8
76
t
h
&
2
3
0
t
h
AL
L
24
X
X
AD
A
9
8
Ca
s
p er
s
&
B
r
o
o
k
m
e
r
e
2
AL
L
24
X
X
M
I
N
O
R
A
R
T
E
R
I
A
L
S
Se
e
P
a
g
e
1
2
f
o
r
N
o
t
e
s
1
-
3
K:
\
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
\
3
1
1
0
0
\
3
1
1
6
1
\
D
a
t
a
\
R
a
m
p
s
\
R
a
m
p
-
2
0
0
9
_
0
2
2
4
.
x
l
s
Sh
e
e
t
1
Pa
g
e
5
o
f
1
2
Ot
a
k
,
I
n
c
.
Pr
i
n
t
e
d
:
4
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
9
Packet Page 878 of 930
Ci
t
y
o
f
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
,
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
AD
A
R
a
m
p
I
n
v
e
n
t
o
r
y
Cr
i
t
.
2
C
r
i
t
e
r
i
a
3
Cr
i
t
e
r
i
a
4
Cr
i
t
e
r
i
a
5
Cr
i
t
e
r
i
a
6
ID
N
o
.
I
N
T
E
R
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
C
O
R
N
E
R
(
S
)
S
t
r
e
e
t
A
C
l
a
s
s
.
1
S
t
r
e
e
t
B
C
l
a
s
s
1
C
o
m
m
.
C
e
n
t
e
r
&
L
i
b
r
a
r
y
S
e
n
i
o
r
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
H
o
s
p
i
t
a
l
B
R
T
/
R
a
i
l
/
F
e
r
r
y
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
R
o
u
t
e
A
d
j
a
c
e
n
t
S
c
h
o
o
l
S
c
h
o
o
l
N
e
a
r
b
y
C
i
t
y
H
a
l
l
/
P
o
l
i
c
e
D
e
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
C
o
m
m
.
Z
o
n
e
A
d
j
a
c
e
n
t
P
a
r
k
P
a
r
k
N
e
a
r
b
y
N
o
R
a
m
p
S
u
b
-
S
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
R
a
m
p
S
u
b
-
S
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
A
s
p
h
a
l
t
R
a
m
p
N
e
w
R
a
m
p
,
W
i
t
h
o
u
t
D
o
m
e
s
A
s
p
h
a
l
t
R
a
m
p
,
N
o
D
o
m
e
s
N
e
w
R
a
m
p
,
W
i
t
h
D
o
m
e
s
AD
A
9
9
Ca
s
p er
s
&
8
t
h
2
NE
,
N
W
24
X
X
AD
A
1
0
0
Mi
d
-
b
l
o
c
k
X
-
w
a
l
k
C
a
s
p
e
r
s
e
a
s
t
of
8
t
h
2
NE
,
N
W
24
X
X
AD
A
1
8
22
0
t
h
&
9
9
t
h
P
l
a
c
e
W
S
W
,
S
E
24
X
X
AD
A
7
6
76
t
h
&
1
9
0
t
h
AL
L
24
X
X
AD
A
1
5
0
F
i
r
d
a
l
e
&
2
4
1
s
t
NE
,
S
E
24
X
AD
A
1
5
1
F
i
r
d
a
l
e
&
2
4
2
n
d
NE
,
S
E
24
X
AD
A
1
5
2
F
i
r
d
a
l
e
&
2
4
3
r
d
AL
L
24
X
AD
A
2
9
1
22
8
t
h
&
7
5
t
h
A
v
e
W
S
E
,
S
W
24
X
AD
A
7
3
76
t
h
&
1
9
4
t
h
AL
L
24
X
AD
A
7
4
76
t
h
&
1
9
3
r
d
AL
L
24
X
AD
A
7
5
76
t
h
&
1
9
1
s
t
AL
L
24
X
AD
A
8
7
19
6
t
h
&
8
2
n
d
AL
L
24
X
AD
A
8
8
19
6
t
h
&
8
4
t
h
AL
L
24
X
AD
A
8
9
19
6
t
h
&
8
6
t
h
AL
L
24
X
AD
A
1
4
8
F
i
r
d
a
l
e
&
2
3
8
t
h
AL
L
24
X
AD
A
2
9
2
22
8
t
h
&
7
4
t
h
A
v
e
W
N
E
,
N
W
24
X
AD
A
1
0
5
3r
d
&
D
a
l
e
y
NE
,
S
E
24
X
AD
A
1
1
9
9t
h
&
M
a
p
l
e
AL
L
24
X
AD
A
1
2
0
9t
h
&
A
l
d
e
r
AL
L
24
X
A DA
1
2
2
9t
h
&
C
e
d
a
r
A LL
24
X
AD
A
1
2
3
9t
h
&
S
p
r
u
c
e
AL
L
24
X
AD
A
1
2
4
9t
h
&
P
i
n
e
AL
L
24
X
AD
A
1
2
5
9t
h
&
F
i
r
AL
L
24
X
AD
A
1
2
8
9
t
h
&
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
AL
L
24
X
AD
A
1
2
9
9
t
h
&
S
p
r
a
g
u
e
AL
L
24
X
AD
A
1
3
0
9t
h
&
D
a
l
e
y
AL
L
24
X
AD
A
1
3
5
9
t
h
&
1
4
t
h
s
t
S
W
NW
,
S
W
24
X
AD
A
1
3
6
9t
h
&
2
2
4
t
h
NE
,
S
E
24
X
AD
A
1
3
7
9t
h
&
2
2
5
t
h
NE
,
S
E
24
X
AD
A
1
3
8
9t
h
&
2
2
6
t
h
AL
L
24
X
AD
A
1
3
9
9t
h
&
2
2
7
t
h
NE
,
S
E
24
X
AD
A
1
4
0
9t
h
&
1
5
t
h
AL
L
24
X
AD
A
1
5
3
2
4
4
t
h
&
9
2
n
d
NE
,
N
W
24
X
AD
A
1
5
4
24
4
t
h
&
9
1
s
t
NE
,
N
W
24
X
AD
A
1
5
5
24
4
t
h
&
9
0
t
h
NE
,
N
W
24
X
AD
A
1
5
9
24
4
t
h
&
9
0
t
h
DU
P
L
I
C
A
T
E
24
X
AD
A
1
5
6
24
4
t
h
&
8
9
t
h
NE
,
N
W
24
X
AD
A
1
6
0
2
4
4
t
h
&
8
8
t
h
(
F
r
e
m
o
n
t
)
A
L
L
24
X
AD
A
1
5
7
24
4
t
h
&
8
7
t
h
NE
,
N
W
24
X
M
I
N
O
R
A
R
T
E
R
I
A
L
S
Se
e
P
a
g
e
1
2
f
o
r
N
o
t
e
s
1
-
3
K:
\
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
\
3
1
1
0
0
\
3
1
1
6
1
\
D
a
t
a
\
R
a
m
p
s
\
R
a
m
p
-
2
0
0
9
_
0
2
2
4
.
x
l
s
Sh
e
e
t
1
Pa
g
e
6
o
f
1
2
Ot
a
k
,
I
n
c
.
Pr
i
n
t
e
d
:
4
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
9
Packet Page 879 of 930
Ci
t
y
o
f
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
,
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
AD
A
R
a
m
p
I
n
v
e
n
t
o
r
y
Cr
i
t
.
2
C
r
i
t
e
r
i
a
3
Cr
i
t
e
r
i
a
4
Cr
i
t
e
r
i
a
5
Cr
i
t
e
r
i
a
6
ID
N
o
.
I
N
T
E
R
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
C
O
R
N
E
R
(
S
)
S
t
r
e
e
t
A
C
l
a
s
s
.
1
S
t
r
e
e
t
B
C
l
a
s
s
1
C
o
m
m
.
C
e
n
t
e
r
&
L
i
b
r
a
r
y
S
e
n
i
o
r
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
H
o
s
p
i
t
a
l
B
R
T
/
R
a
i
l
/
F
e
r
r
y
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
R
o
u
t
e
A
d
j
a
c
e
n
t
S
c
h
o
o
l
S
c
h
o
o
l
N
e
a
r
b
y
C
i
t
y
H
a
l
l
/
P
o
l
i
c
e
D
e
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
C
o
m
m
.
Z
o
n
e
A
d
j
a
c
e
n
t
P
a
r
k
P
a
r
k
N
e
a
r
b
y
N
o
R
a
m
p
S
u
b
-
S
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
R
a
m
p
S
u
b
-
S
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
A
s
p
h
a
l
t
R
a
m
p
N
e
w
R
a
m
p
,
W
i
t
h
o
u
t
D
o
m
e
s
A
s
p
h
a
l
t
R
a
m
p
,
N
o
D
o
m
e
s
N
e
w
R
a
m
p
,
W
i
t
h
D
o
m
e
s
AD
A
1
6
1
24
4
t
h
&
8
7
t
h
DU
P
L
I
C
A
T
E
24
X
AD
A
1
5
8
24
4
t
h
&
8
9
t
h
NE
,
N
W
24
X
AD
A
1
3
2
9t
h
&
C
a
r
o
l
NE
24
X
AD
A
1
3
1
9t
h
&
C
a
r
o
l
SE
24
X
AD
A
1
2
6
9
t
h
&
S
e
a
V
i
s
t
a
NE
,
S
E
24
X
AD
A
1
2
7
9
t
h
&
S
e
a
V
i
s
t
a
NW
,
S
W
24
X
AD
A
1
4
9
F
i
r
d
a
l
e
&
2
4
0
t
h
NE
,
S
E
24
X
AD
A
8
0
O
l
y
m
p
i
c
V
i
e
w
D
r
&
K
a
i
r
e
z
A
L
L
24
X
AD
A
8
6
19
6
t
h
&
8
1
s
t
SW
,
S
E
24
X
AD
A
1
3
3
9t
h
&
C
a
s
p er
s
2
SE
,
S
W
24
X
AD
A
1
4
2
9t
h
&
H
i
n
d
l
e
y 2
AL
L
24
X
AD
A
1
4
3
Mi
d
-
b
l
o
c
k
X
-
w
a
l
k
9
t
h
s
o
u
t
h
o
f
Hi
n
d
l
e
y
2
SE
,
S
W
24
X
M
I
N
O
R
A
R
T
E
R
I
A
L
S
Se
e
P
a
g
e
1
2
f
o
r
N
o
t
e
s
1
-
3
K:
\
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
\
3
1
1
0
0
\
3
1
1
6
1
\
D
a
t
a
\
R
a
m
p
s
\
R
a
m
p
-
2
0
0
9
_
0
2
2
4
.
x
l
s
Sh
e
e
t
1
Pa
g
e
7
o
f
1
2
Ot
a
k
,
I
n
c
.
Pr
i
n
t
e
d
:
4
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
9
Packet Page 880 of 930
Ci
t
y
o
f
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
,
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
AD
A
R
a
m
p
I
n
v
e
n
t
o
r
y
Cr
i
t
.
2
C
r
i
t
e
r
i
a
3
Cr
i
t
e
r
i
a
4
Cr
i
t
e
r
i
a
5
Cr
i
t
e
r
i
a
6
ID
N
o
.
I
N
T
E
R
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
C
O
R
N
E
R
(
S
)
S
t
r
e
e
t
A
C
l
a
s
s
.
1
S
t
r
e
e
t
B
C
l
a
s
s
1
C
o
m
m
.
C
e
n
t
e
r
&
L
i
b
r
a
r
y
S
e
n
i
o
r
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
H
o
s
p
i
t
a
l
B
R
T
/
R
a
i
l
/
F
e
r
r
y
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
R
o
u
t
e
A
d
j
a
c
e
n
t
S
c
h
o
o
l
S
c
h
o
o
l
N
e
a
r
b
y
C
i
t
y
H
a
l
l
/
P
o
l
i
c
e
D
e
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
C
o
m
m
.
Z
o
n
e
A
d
j
a
c
e
n
t
P
a
r
k
P
a
r
k
N
e
a
r
b
y
N
o
R
a
m
p
S
u
b
-
S
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
R
a
m
p
S
u
b
-
S
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
A
s
p
h
a
l
t
R
a
m
p
N
e
w
R
a
m
p
,
W
i
t
h
o
u
t
D
o
m
e
s
A
s
p
h
a
l
t
R
a
m
p
,
N
o
D
o
m
e
s
N
e
w
R
a
m
p
,
W
i
t
h
D
o
m
e
s
AD
A
3
2
8
Bo
w
d
o
i
n
&
9
6
t
h
S
W
,
S
E
33
X
XX
X
AD
A
3
3
5
20
0
t
h
&
M
a
p
l
e
w
o
o
d
SE
33
X
X
AD
A
3
3
9
20
0
t
h
&
8
0
t
h
SE
,
S
W
33
X
X
AD
A
3
6
6
88
t
h
&
O
l
y
m
p
i
c
V
i
e
w
D
r
S
E
33
X
X
AD
A
3
3
0
88
t
h
&
2
0
0
t
h
SE
,
S
W
33
X
AD
A
3
8
7
76
t
h
&
M
e
a
d
o
w
d
a
l
e
B
e
a
c
h
2
SE
,
N
E
33
X
AD
A
2
4
8
7t
h
&
D
a
y
t
o
n
NW
,
S
E
34
X
X
XX
X
AD
A
2
4
7
7
t
h
&
D
a
y
t
o
n
SW
34
X
X
XX
X
AD
A
2
2
0
8t
h
&
D
a
y
t
o
n
AL
L
34
X
XX
X
AD
A
3
1
4
20
8
t
h
&
7
4
t
h
SE
3
4
XX
X
X
AD
A
3
1
3
20
8
t
h
&
7
4
t
h
NW
,
S
W
3
4
XX
X
AD
A
8
3
84
t
h
&
2
1
4
t
h
SW
,
N
W
34
X
X
X
AD
A
8
4
84
t
h
&
2
1
4
t
h
NE
,
S
E
34
X
X
X
AD
A
8
1
84
t
h
&
2
1
8
t
h
NE
,
S
E
34
X
X
X
AD
A
8
2
84
t
h
&
2
1
5
t
h
NE
,
S
E
34
X
X
X
AD
A
3
1
2
20
8
t
h
&
7
2
n
d
N
W
,
S
W
,
S
E
34
X
X
X
AD
A
3
3
6
20
0
t
h
&
8
4
t
h
SE
,
S
W
34
XX
X
AD
A
2
3
7
7t
h
&
A
l
o
h
a
AL
L
34
XX
X
AD
A
2
3
8
7t
h
&
G
l
e
n
AL
L
34
XX
X
AD
A
3
5
8
18
8
t
h
&
8
8
t
h
NE
,
S
E
34
X
X
X
AD
A
3
6
8
88
t
h
&
1
8
9
t
h
NE
,
S
E
34
X
X
X
AD
A
2
1
7
10
t
h
&
W
a
l
n
u
t
AL
L
34
X
X
X
AD
A
2
7
6
Wa
l
n
u
t
&
9
5
t
h
AL
L
34
X
X
X
AD
A
3
2
9
Wa
l
n
u
t
&
1
0
t
h
A
v
e
S
AL
L
34
X
X
X
AD
A
2
4
2
7
t
h
&
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
AL
L
34
X
XX
X
AD
A
2
4
3
7
t
h
&
S
p
r
a
g
u
e
AL
L
34
X
XX
X
AD
A
2
4
4
7t
h
&
D
a
l
e
y
AL
L
34
X
X
X
AD
A
3
2
0
Bo
w
d
o
i
n
W
a
y
&
8
9
t
h
S
W
,
S
E
34
X
X
AD
A
3
2
2
Bo
w
d
o
i
n
&
9
0
t
h
SW
,
S
E
34
X
X
AD
A
3
2
3
Bo
w
d
o
i
n
&
9
2
n
d
A
v
e
S
W
,
S
E
34
X
X
AD
A
3
2
5
Bo
w
d
o
i
n
&
9
2
n
d
P
l
a
c
e
A
L
L
34
X
X
AD
A
3
2
7
Bo
w
d
o
i
n
&
9
3
r
d
A
v
e
S
W
,
S
E
34
X
X
AD
A
3
5
2
80
t
h
&
1
8
8
t
h
SW
34
X
X
AD
A
3
1
8
Bo
w
d
o
i
n
&
8
6
t
h
P
l
a
c
e
W
N
W
,
N
E
34
X
X
AD
A
3
2
1
Bo
w
d
o
i
n
&
P
i
o
n
e
e
r
W
a
y
N
W
,
N
E
34
X
X
AD
A
3
2
4
Bo
w
d
o
i
n
&
P
a
r
k
R
d
N
W
,
N
E
3
4
X
X
C
O
L
L
E
C
T
O
R
S
Se
e
P
a
g
e
1
2
f
o
r
N
o
t
e
s
1
-
3
K:
\
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
\
3
1
1
0
0
\
3
1
1
6
1
\
D
a
t
a
\
R
a
m
p
s
\
R
a
m
p
-
2
0
0
9
_
0
2
2
4
.
x
l
s
Sh
e
e
t
1
Pa
g
e
8
o
f
1
2
Ot
a
k
,
I
n
c
.
Pr
i
n
t
e
d
:
4
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
9
Packet Page 881 of 930
Ci
t
y
o
f
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
,
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
AD
A
R
a
m
p
I
n
v
e
n
t
o
r
y
Cr
i
t
.
2
C
r
i
t
e
r
i
a
3
Cr
i
t
e
r
i
a
4
Cr
i
t
e
r
i
a
5
Cr
i
t
e
r
i
a
6
ID
N
o
.
I
N
T
E
R
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
C
O
R
N
E
R
(
S
)
S
t
r
e
e
t
A
C
l
a
s
s
.
1
S
t
r
e
e
t
B
C
l
a
s
s
1
C
o
m
m
.
C
e
n
t
e
r
&
L
i
b
r
a
r
y
S
e
n
i
o
r
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
H
o
s
p
i
t
a
l
B
R
T
/
R
a
i
l
/
F
e
r
r
y
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
R
o
u
t
e
A
d
j
a
c
e
n
t
S
c
h
o
o
l
S
c
h
o
o
l
N
e
a
r
b
y
C
i
t
y
H
a
l
l
/
P
o
l
i
c
e
D
e
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
C
o
m
m
.
Z
o
n
e
A
d
j
a
c
e
n
t
P
a
r
k
P
a
r
k
N
e
a
r
b
y
N
o
R
a
m
p
S
u
b
-
S
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
R
a
m
p
S
u
b
-
S
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
A
s
p
h
a
l
t
R
a
m
p
N
e
w
R
a
m
p
,
W
i
t
h
o
u
t
D
o
m
e
s
A
s
p
h
a
l
t
R
a
m
p
,
N
o
D
o
m
e
s
N
e
w
R
a
m
p
,
W
i
t
h
D
o
m
e
s
AD
A
3
2
6
Bo
w
d
o
i
n
&
9
3
r
d
P
l
a
c
e
S
W
,
S
E
34
X
X
AD
A
3
1
9
Bo
w
d
o
i
n
&
8
8
t
h
SW
,
S
E
34
X
X
AD
A
3
1
7
Bo
w
d
o
i
n
&
8
6
t
h
A
v
e
W
S
W
,
S
E
34
X
X
AD
A
3
3
7
20
0
t
h
&
8
3
r
d
SE
,
S
W
34
X
X
AD
A
3
3
8
20
0
t
h
&
8
1
s
t
SE
,
S
W
34
X
X
AD
A
2
4
6
7
t
h
&
V
i
s
t
a
P
l
a
c
e
AL
L
34
X
X
AD
A
1
1
4
3r
d
&
H
o
w
e
l
l
NE
,
S
E
34
XX
X
AD
A
1
1
5
3r
d
&
E
r
b
e
n
NE
,
S
E
34
XX
X
AD
A
1
1
6
3r
d
&
P
i
n
e
NE
,
N
W
,
S
W
34
XX
X
AD
A
3
5
1
80
t
h
&
1
9
0
t
h
NW
,
S
W
34
XX
X
AD
A
3
8
4
76
t
h
&
S
o
u
n
d
v
i
e
w
D
r
.
SE
34
XX
X
AD
A
3
8
5
76
t
h
&
S
o
u
n
d
v
i
e
w
D
r
.
NE
34
XX
X
AD
A
3
8
2
76
t
h
&
1
8
0
t
h
NE
,
S
E
34
XX
X
AD
A
3
8
3
76
t
h
&
1
7
8
t
h
NE
,
S
E
34
XX
X
AD
A
1
1
3
3r
d
&
W
a
l
n
u
t
NE
,
S
E
34
X
X
AD
A
3
4
8
80
t
h
&
S
i
e
r
r
a
NW
,
S
W
34
X
X
AD
A
2
0
1
Be
l
l
&
7
t
h
NE
,
N
W
,
S
W
34
X
X
AD
A
2
0
0
Be
l
l
&
7
t
h
SE
34
X
X
AD
A
3
5
0
80
t
h
&
1
9
2
n
d
NW
34
X
X
AD
A
3
4
9
80
t
h
&
1
9
2
n
d
SW
34
X
X
AD
A
3
7
4
Ol
y
m
p
i
c
V
i
e
w
D
r
&
T
a
l
b
o
t
N
W
,
N
E
3
4
X
X
AD
A
1
1
7
3r
d
&
E
l
m
AL
L
34
X
AD
A
1
1
2
3r
d
&
A
l
d
e
r
NW
,
S
W
34
X
AD
A
3
6
0
18
5
t
h
&
8
8
t
h
NE
,
S
E
34
X
AD
A
3
6
1
18
4
t
h
&
8
8
t
h
NE
,
S
E
34
X
AD
A
3
6
7
88
t
h
&
1
8
2
n
d
NE
,
S
E
34
X
AD
A
3
7
6
Ol
y
m
p
i
c
V
i
e
w
D
r
&
B
l
a
k
e
N
W
,
N
E
3
4
X
AD
A
3
7
7
Ol
y
m
p
i
c
V
i
e
w
D
r
&
C
h
e
r
r
y
N
W
,
N
E
3
4
X
AD
A
3
7
8
Ol
y
m
p
i
c
V
i
e
w
D
r
&
E
u
c
l
i
d
N
W
,
N
E
3
4
X
AD
A
3
5
9
18
7
t
h
&
8
8
t
h
NE
,
S
E
34
X
AD
A
3
6
9
88
t
h
&
1
9
2
n
d
NE
,
S
E
34
X
AD
A
3
7
5
Ol
y
m
p
i
c
V
i
e
w
D
r
&
W
h
a
r
f
N
W
,
N
E
3
4
X
AD
A
3
8
6
76
t
h
&
B
r
a
e
m
a
r
NE
,
S
E
34
X
AD
A
3
8
8
75
t
h
&
1
6
2
n
d
S
t
.
S
W
2
SE
,
S
W
,
N
W
3
4
X
C
O
L
L
E
C
T
O
R
S
Se
e
P
a
g
e
1
2
f
o
r
N
o
t
e
s
1
-
3
K:
\
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
\
3
1
1
0
0
\
3
1
1
6
1
\
D
a
t
a
\
R
a
m
p
s
\
R
a
m
p
-
2
0
0
9
_
0
2
2
4
.
x
l
s
Sh
e
e
t
1
Pa
g
e
9
o
f
1
2
Ot
a
k
,
I
n
c
.
Pr
i
n
t
e
d
:
4
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
9
Packet Page 882 of 930
Ci
t
y
o
f
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
,
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
AD
A
R
a
m
p
I
n
v
e
n
t
o
r
y
Cr
i
t
.
2
C
r
i
t
e
r
i
a
3
Cr
i
t
e
r
i
a
4
Cr
i
t
e
r
i
a
5
Cr
i
t
e
r
i
a
6
ID
N
o
.
I
N
T
E
R
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
C
O
R
N
E
R
(
S
)
S
t
r
e
e
t
A
C
l
a
s
s
.
1
S
t
r
e
e
t
B
C
l
a
s
s
1
C
o
m
m
.
C
e
n
t
e
r
&
L
i
b
r
a
r
y
S
e
n
i
o
r
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
H
o
s
p
i
t
a
l
B
R
T
/
R
a
i
l
/
F
e
r
r
y
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
R
o
u
t
e
A
d
j
a
c
e
n
t
S
c
h
o
o
l
S
c
h
o
o
l
N
e
a
r
b
y
C
i
t
y
H
a
l
l
/
P
o
l
i
c
e
D
e
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
C
o
m
m
.
Z
o
n
e
A
d
j
a
c
e
n
t
P
a
r
k
P
a
r
k
N
e
a
r
b
y
N
o
R
a
m
p
S
u
b
-
S
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
R
a
m
p
S
u
b
-
S
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
A
s
p
h
a
l
t
R
a
m
p
N
e
w
R
a
m
p
,
W
i
t
h
o
u
t
D
o
m
e
s
A
s
p
h
a
l
t
R
a
m
p
,
N
o
D
o
m
e
s
N
e
w
R
a
m
p
,
W
i
t
h
D
o
m
e
s
AD
A
3
4
7
72
n
d
&
2
1
6
t
h
NW
,
N
S
W
44
X
X
X
X
AD
A
3
5
6
18
8
t
h
&
8
5
t
h
NE
4
4
XX
X
X
AD
A
3
0
6
21
6
t
h
&
7
8
t
h
SW
,
S
E
44
XX
X
AD
A
3
5
4
18
8
t
h
&
8
3
r
d
SE
,
S
W
44
X
X
X
AD
A
3
5
5
18
8
t
h
&
8
4
t
h
SE
,
S
W
44
X
X
X
AD
A
3
5
7
18
8
t
h
&
8
6
t
h
NE
44
X
X
X
AD
A
2
0
5
2
2
8
t
h
&
1
0
6
t
h
NE
,
S
E
44
XX
X
AD
A
2
0
6
2
2
9
t
h
&
1
0
6
t
h
SE
44
XX
X
AD
A
3
1
0
21
0
t
h
&
7
4
t
h
NE
,
N
W
44
X
X
X
AD
A
3
4
6
72
n
d
&
2
1
3
t
h
NW
,
S
W
44
X
X
X
AD
A
3
5
3
18
8
t
h
&
8
1
s
t
SE
,
S
W
44
X
X
X
AD
A
2
1
4
97
t
h
&
2
3
9
t
h
SE
,
S
W
44
X
X
AD
A
2
1
5
2
3
9
t
h
&
2
3
8
t
h
SE
,
S
W
44
X
X
AD
A
3
0
7
21
6
t
h
&
8
0
t
h
AL
L
44
X
X
AD
A
3
0
8
21
4
t
h
&
8
0
t
h
NW
,
S
W
44
X
X
AD
A
3
0
9
21
3
t
h
&
8
0
t
h
AL
L
44
X
X
AD
A
3
3
3
88
t
h
&
2
0
4
t
h
SE
,
S
W
44
X
X
AD
A
3
3
4
88
t
h
&
2
0
2
n
d
NE
,
S
E
44
X
X
AD
A
3
4
0
20
6
t
h
&
7
7
t
h
NE
,
N
W
44
X
X
AD
A
3
4
1
20
6
t
h
&
7
8
t
h
NW
,
N
E
44
X
X
AD
A
3
4
2
20
6
t
h
&
7
9
t
h
NW
,
N
E
44
X
X
AD
A
3
6
3
84
t
h
&
1
9
2
n
d
NE
,
S
E
44
X
X
AD
A
3
6
4
84
t
h
&
1
8
7
t
h
NE
,
S
E
44
X
X
AD
A
3
6
5
84
t
h
&
1
8
6
t
h
NE
,
S
E
44
X
X
AD
A
3
7
0
Ol
y
m
p
i
c
A
v
e
&
V
i
e
w
l
a
n
d
W
a
y
N
E
,
S
E
4
4
X
X
AD
A
2
1
2
9
6
t
h
&
2
4
0
t
h
AL
L
44
X
X
AD
A
2
1
3
97
t
h
&
2
4
0
t
h
NE
,
N
W
44
X
X
AD
A
2
0
3
2
2
6
t
h
&
1
0
5
t
h
P
l
a
c
e
W
S
W
44
X
X
AD
A
2
0
4
2
2
6
t
h
&
1
0
6
t
h
A
v
e
W
SE
44
X
X
AD
A
2
0
7
2
3
1
s
t
&
1
0
6
t
h
SW
44
X
X
AD
A
2
6
2
6t
h
&
P
i
n
e
AL
L
44
XX
X
AD
A
3
4
5
20
6
t
h
&
8
2
n
d
NE
44
XX
AD
A
2
6
6
4t
h
&
D
a
l
e
y
AL
L
44
X
X
AD
A
2
7
0
2n
d
&
A
l
d
e
r
NE
,
S
E
,
S
W
44
X
X
L
O
C
A
L
S
T
R
E
E
T
S
Se
e
P
a
g
e
1
2
f
o
r
N
o
t
e
s
1
-
3
K:
\
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
\
3
1
1
0
0
\
3
1
1
6
1
\
D
a
t
a
\
R
a
m
p
s
\
R
a
m
p
-
2
0
0
9
_
0
2
2
4
.
x
l
s
Sh
e
e
t
1
Pa
g
e
1
0
o
f
1
2
Ot
a
k
,
I
n
c
.
Pr
i
n
t
e
d
:
4
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
9
Packet Page 883 of 930
Ci
t
y
o
f
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
,
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
AD
A
R
a
m
p
I
n
v
e
n
t
o
r
y
Cr
i
t
.
2
C
r
i
t
e
r
i
a
3
Cr
i
t
e
r
i
a
4
Cr
i
t
e
r
i
a
5
Cr
i
t
e
r
i
a
6
ID
N
o
.
I
N
T
E
R
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
C
O
R
N
E
R
(
S
)
S
t
r
e
e
t
A
C
l
a
s
s
.
1
S
t
r
e
e
t
B
C
l
a
s
s
1
C
o
m
m
.
C
e
n
t
e
r
&
L
i
b
r
a
r
y
S
e
n
i
o
r
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
H
o
s
p
i
t
a
l
B
R
T
/
R
a
i
l
/
F
e
r
r
y
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
R
o
u
t
e
A
d
j
a
c
e
n
t
S
c
h
o
o
l
S
c
h
o
o
l
N
e
a
r
b
y
C
i
t
y
H
a
l
l
/
P
o
l
i
c
e
D
e
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
C
o
m
m
.
Z
o
n
e
A
d
j
a
c
e
n
t
P
a
r
k
P
a
r
k
N
e
a
r
b
y
N
o
R
a
m
p
S
u
b
-
S
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
R
a
m
p
S
u
b
-
S
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
A
s
p
h
a
l
t
R
a
m
p
N
e
w
R
a
m
p
,
W
i
t
h
o
u
t
D
o
m
e
s
A
s
p
h
a
l
t
R
a
m
p
,
N
o
D
o
m
e
s
N
e
w
R
a
m
p
,
W
i
t
h
D
o
m
e
s
AD
A
3
1
1
21
0
t
h
&
7
2
n
d
N
W
,
S
W
,
S
E
44
X
X
AD
A
3
1
6
N.
M
e
a
d
o
w
d
a
l
e
&
7
5
t
h
S
E
,
S
W
44
X
X
AD
A
2
1
8
8t
h
&
M
a
p
l
e
SW
,
N
E
44
X
X
AD
A
2
1
9
8t
h
&
M
a
p
l
e
SE
,
N
W
44
X
X
AD
A
2
5
2
7t
h
&
M
a
p
l
e
NW
,
S
W
,
N
E
44
X
X
AD
A
2
5
3
7t
h
&
M
a
p
l
e
SE
44
X
X
AD
A
2
5
9
6t
h
&
D
a
l
e
y
AL
L
44
X
X
AD
A
2
7
8
Fi
r
&
A
A
v
e
AL
L
44
X
X
AD
A
3
4
4
20
6
t
h
&
8
1
s
t
NW
,
N
E
44
X
X
AD
A
2
6
8
4t
h
&
H
o
w
e
l
l
NE
,
S
E
,
N
W
44
X
X
AD
A
2
6
9
4t
h
&
H
o
w
e
l
l
SW
44
X
X
AD
A
3
7
3
Ol
y
m
p
i
c
A
v
e
&
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
S
t
N
E
,
S
E
4
4
X
X
AD
A
2
4
1
7
t
h
&
E
l
m
P
l
a
c
e
W
AL
L
44
X
AD
A
2
5
7
6t
h
&
M
a
p
l
e
AL
L
44
X
AD
A
2
2
7
8
t
h
&
1
4
t
h
W
a
y
NE
,
S
E
44
X
AD
A
2
4
9
7t
h
&
A
l
d
e
r
AL
L
44
X
AD
A
2
5
0
7t
h
&
W
a
l
n
u
t
NE
,
S
E
44
X
AD
A
2
5
1
7t
h
&
C
e
d
a
r
NE
44
X
AD
A
2
2
9
8t
h
&
C
e
d
a
r
SE
44
X
AD
A
2
3
0
8t
h
&
S
p
r
u
c
e
NW
44
X
AD
A
2
3
1
8t
h
&
L
a
u
r
e
l
SW
44
X
AD
A
2
3
2
8t
h
&
E
l
m
NW
,
S
W
44
X
AD
A
2
3
3
8t
h
&
F
i
r
NW
,
S
E
44
X
AD
A
2
2
1
8t
h
&
A
l
d
e
r
NE
,
N
W
44
X
AD
A
2
6
1
6t
h
&
W
a
l
n
u
t
SW
44
X
AD
A
2
6
0
6t
h
&
W
a
l
n
u
t
AL
L
44
X
AD
A
2
3
9
7t
h
&
E
l
m
S
t
.
SE
44
X
AD
A
2
4
0
7t
h
&
E
l
m
S
t
.
SW
44
X
AD
A
2
5
5
6t
h
&
A
l
d
e
r
NW
44
X
AD
A
2
5
4
6t
h
&
A
l
d
e
r
SE
,
N
E
44
X
AD
A
2
5
6
6t
h
&
A
l
d
e
r
SW
44
X
AD
A
2
3
5
8
t
h
&
P
i
n
e
S
t
.
NW
44
X
AD
A
2
3
4
8
t
h
&
P
i
n
e
S
t
.
NE
44
X
AD
A
2
2
3
8
t
h
&
P
i
n
e
S
t
.
D
U
P
L
I
C
A
T
E
44
X
AD
A
2
2
2
8
t
h
&
P
i
n
e
S
t
.
D
U
P
L
I
C
A
T
E
44
AD
A
2
2
8
8
t
h
&
1
4
t
h
S
t
.
SE
44
X
AD
A
2
3
6
7th
P
l
a
c
e
&
1
3
t
h
W
a
y
N
E
44
X
L
O
C
A
L
S
T
R
E
E
T
S
Se
e
P
a
g
e
1
2
f
o
r
N
o
t
e
s
1
-
3
K:
\
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
\
3
1
1
0
0
\
3
1
1
6
1
\
D
a
t
a
\
R
a
m
p
s
\
R
a
m
p
-
2
0
0
9
_
0
2
2
4
.
x
l
s
Sh
e
e
t
1
Pa
g
e
1
1
o
f
1
2
Ot
a
k
,
I
n
c
.
Pr
i
n
t
e
d
:
4
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
9
Packet Page 884 of 930
Ci
t
y
o
f
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
,
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
AD
A
R
a
m
p
I
n
v
e
n
t
o
r
y
Cr
i
t
.
2
C
r
i
t
e
r
i
a
3
Cr
i
t
e
r
i
a
4
Cr
i
t
e
r
i
a
5
Cr
i
t
e
r
i
a
6
ID
N
o
.
I
N
T
E
R
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
C
O
R
N
E
R
(
S
)
S
t
r
e
e
t
A
C
l
a
s
s
.
1
S
t
r
e
e
t
B
C
l
a
s
s
1
C
o
m
m
.
C
e
n
t
e
r
&
L
i
b
r
a
r
y
S
e
n
i
o
r
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
H
o
s
p
i
t
a
l
B
R
T
/
R
a
i
l
/
F
e
r
r
y
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
R
o
u
t
e
A
d
j
a
c
e
n
t
S
c
h
o
o
l
S
c
h
o
o
l
N
e
a
r
b
y
C
i
t
y
H
a
l
l
/
P
o
l
i
c
e
D
e
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
C
o
m
m
.
Z
o
n
e
A
d
j
a
c
e
n
t
P
a
r
k
P
a
r
k
N
e
a
r
b
y
N
o
R
a
m
p
S
u
b
-
S
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
R
a
m
p
S
u
b
-
S
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
A
s
p
h
a
l
t
R
a
m
p
N
e
w
R
a
m
p
,
W
i
t
h
o
u
t
D
o
m
e
s
A
s
p
h
a
l
t
R
a
m
p
,
N
o
D
o
m
e
s
N
e
w
R
a
m
p
,
W
i
t
h
D
o
m
e
s
AD
A
2
4
5
7t
h
&
B
i
r
c
h
A
L
L
44
X
AD
A
2
5
8
6t
h
&
E
l
m
S
t
.
AL
L
44
X
AD
A
2
6
7
4t
h
&
W
a
l
n
u
t
AL
L
44
X
AD
A
2
7
7
Pi
n
e
S
t
.
&
C
A
v
e
SE
,
S
W
44
X
AD
A
2
1
0
2
3
7
t
h
&
1
0
6
t
h
AL
L
44
X
AD
A
2
1
1
2
3
7
t
h
&
1
0
7
t
h
AL
L
44
X
AD
A
2
1
6
Ro
b
i
n
H
o
o
d
&
1
0
6
t
h
N
E
,
S
E
44
X
AD
A
2
2
4
8
t
h
P
l
a
c
e
&
1
5
t
h
SE
,
S
W
44
X
AD
A
3
3
1
88
t
h
&
2
0
5
t
h
NW
44
X
AD
A
3
3
2
88
t
h
&
2
0
5
t
h
SW
44
X
AD
A
3
4
3
20
6
t
h
&
8
0
t
h
NW
,
N
E
44
X
AD
A
3
6
2
84
t
h
&
1
9
4
t
h
NE
,
S
E
44
X
AD
A
2
2
6
8
t
h
A
v
e
&
1
5
t
h
SE
44
X
AD
A
2
2
5
8
t
h
A
v
e
&
1
5
t
h
NE
44
X
AD
A
2
0
9
2
3
7
t
h
&
1
0
4
t
h
SW
44
X
AD
A
2
0
8
2
3
7
t
h
&
1
0
4
t
h
NW
44
X
AD
A
3
7
9
23
7
t
h
&
1
0
4
t
h
SW
44
X
AD
A
3
8
0
23
7
t
h
&
1
0
6
t
h
AL
L
44
X
AD
A
3
8
1
23
7
t
h
&
1
0
7
t
h
AL
L
44
X
AD
A
3
7
2
Ol
y
m
p
i
c
A
v
e
&
D
a
l
e
y
P
l
a
c
e
N
E
,
S
E
4
4
X
AD
A
3
7
1
Ol
y
m
p
i
c
A
v
e
&
S
i
e
r
r
a
P
l
a
c
e
N
E
,
S
E
4
4
X
AD
A
3
1
5
N.
M
e
a
d
o
w
d
a
l
e
&
1
6
4
t
h
S
W
,
N
W
4
4
X
No
t
e
1
:
"
1
"
=
P
r
i
n
c
i
p
a
l
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
,
"
2
"
=
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
,
"
3
"
=
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
,
"
4
"
=
L
o
c
a
l
S
t
r
e
e
t
No
t
e
2
:
N
o
t
e
"
4
"
i
n
d
i
c
a
t
e
s
r
a
m
p
s
t
h
a
t
w
i
l
l
b
e
u
p
g
r
a
d
e
d
t
o
n
e
w
A
D
A
s
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
s
a
s
p
a
r
t
o
f
a
f
u
t
u
r
e
C
i
t
y
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
l
y
w
o
r
k
i
n
g
o
n
No
t
e
3
:
C
r
i
t
e
r
i
a
N
u
m
b
e
r
1
i
s
t
h
e
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
w
i
t
h
i
n
D
o
w
n
t
o
w
n
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
.
L
O
C
A
L
S
T
R
E
E
T
S
Se
e
P
a
g
e
1
2
f
o
r
N
o
t
e
s
1
-
3
K:
\
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
\
3
1
1
0
0
\
3
1
1
6
1
\
D
a
t
a
\
R
a
m
p
s
\
R
a
m
p
-
2
0
0
9
_
0
2
2
4
.
x
l
s
Sh
e
e
t
1
Pa
g
e
1
2
o
f
1
2
Ot
a
k
,
I
n
c
.
Pr
i
n
t
e
d
:
4
/
2
4
/
2
0
0
9
Packet Page 885 of 930
Appendix D
Walkway Projects
Packet Page 886 of 930
Packet Page 887 of 930
ID
S
t
r
e
e
t
N
a
m
e
F
r
o
m
T
o
Le
n
g
t
h
(f
e
e
t
)
D
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
G ut
t
e
r
/
Dr
a
i
n
a
g
e
/
Di
t
c
h
P
h
o
t
o
D
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
W
a
l
k
w
a
y
T
y
p
e
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
Co
s
t
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
S1
2
n
d
A
v
e
S
J
a
m
e
s
S
t
M
a
i
n
S
t
1
0
0
C
o
n
c
r
e
t
e
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
o
n
w
e
s
t
s
i
d
e
w
i
t
h
di
s
c
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
o
n
e
a
s
t
s
i
d
e
.
Ye
s
,
dr
a
i
n
a
g
e
.
In
s
t
a
l
l
8
f
t
w
i
d
e
c
o
n
c
r
e
t
e
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
o
n
e
a
s
t
si
d
e
o
f
s
t
r
e
e
t
t
o
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
.
8
f
t
w
i
d
e
c
o
n
c
r
e
t
e
si
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
w
i
t
h
c
u
r
b
s
a
n
d
gu
t
t
e
r
s
.
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
Re
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
e
d
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
Sh
o
r
t
W
a
l
k
w
a
y
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
$2
5
,
0
0
0
S2
D
a
y
t
o
n
S
t
7
t
h
A
v
e
S
8
t
h
A
v
e
S
2
5
0
C
o
n
c
r
e
t
e
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
o
n
n
o
r
t
h
s
i
d
e
w
i
t
h
di
s
c
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
o
n
s
o
u
t
h
s
i
d
e
.
Ye
s
,
dr
a
i
n
a
g
e
.
In
s
t
a
l
l
5
f
t
w
i
d
e
c
o
n
c
r
e
t
e
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
o
n
s
o
u
t
h
si
d
e
o
f
s
t
r
e
e
t
t
o
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
.
5
f
t
w
i
d
e
c
o
n
c
r
e
t
e
si
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
w
i
t
h
c
u
r
b
s
a
n
d
gu
t
t
e
r
s
.
$6
3
0
0
0
$6
3
,
0
0
0
S3
M
a
p
l
e
S
t
W
e
s
t
o
f
6
t
h
Av
e
S
8t
h
A
v
e
S
2
5
0
N
a
r
r
o
w
c
o
n
c
r
e
t
e
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
(
3
-
4
f
t
)
w
i
t
h
di
s
c
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
o
n
s
o
u
t
h
s
i
d
e
be
t
w
e
e
n
7
t
h
a
n
d
8
t
h
A
v
e
.
No
In
s
t
a
l
l
n
e
w
5
f
t
w
i
d
e
c
o
n
c
r
e
t
e
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
o
n
so
u
t
h
s
i
d
e
o
f
s
t
r
e
e
t
t
o
m
e
e
t
s
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
w
i
d
t
h
.
5
f
t
w
i
d
e
c
o
n
c
r
e
t
e
si
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
w
i
t
h
c
u
r
b
s
a
n
d
gu
t
t
e
r
s
.
$5
0
,
0
0
0
S4
W
a
l
n
u
t
S
t
6
t
h
A
v
e
S
7
t
h
A
v
e
S
7
0
0
C
o
n
c
r
e
t
e
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
o
n
s
o
u
t
h
s
i
d
e
o
n
t
h
e
we
s
t
e
n
d
.
N
o
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
o
r
s
t
r
i
p
e
d
sh
o
u
l
d
e
r
s
f
o
r
t
h
e
r
e
s
t
o
f
s
e
g
m
e
n
t
.
Ye
s
,
dr
a
i
n
a
g
e
.
In
s
t
a
l
l
5
f
t
w
i
d
e
c
o
n
c
r
e
t
e
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
o
n
e
i
t
h
e
r
si
d
e
o
f
s
t
r
e
e
t
t
o
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
.
5
f
t
w
i
d
e
c
o
n
c
r
e
t
e
si
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
w
i
t
h
c
u
r
b
s
a
n
d
gu
t
t
e
r
s
$1
7
5
,
0
0
0
S5
W
a
l
n
u
t
S
t
3
r
d
A
v
e
S
4
t
h
A
v
e
S
3
5
0
C
o
n
c
r
e
t
e
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
o
n
n
o
r
t
h
s
i
d
e
.
N
o
si
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
/
s
h
o
u
l
d
e
r
s
o
n
s
o
u
t
h
s
i
d
e
.
Ye
s
,
dr
a
i
n
a
g
e
.
In
s
t
a
l
l
8
f
t
w
i
d
e
c
o
n
c
r
e
t
e
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
o
n
s
o
u
t
h
si
d
e
o
f
s
t
r
e
e
t
t
o
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
t
o
th
e
e
a
s
t
.
8
f
t
w
i
d
e
c
o
n
c
r
e
t
e
si
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
w
i
t
h
c
u
r
b
s
a
n
d
gu
t
t
e
r
s
.
$8
8
,
0
0
0
Packet Page 888 of 930
ID
S
t
r
e
e
t
N
a
m
e
F
r
o
m
T
o
Le
n
g
t
h
(f
e
e
t
)
D
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
G ut
t
e
r
/
Dr
a
i
n
a
g
e
/
Di
t
c
h
P
h
o
t
o
D
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
W
a
l
k
w
a
y
T
y
p
e
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
Co
s
t
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
Re
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
e
d
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
S6
2
2
6
t
h
S
t
S
W
1
0
6
t
h
A
v
e
W
S
R
1
0
4
7
0
0
N
a
r
r
o
w
u
n
p
a
v
e
d
s
h
o
u
l
d
e
r
s
o
n
b
o
t
h
s
i
d
e
s
wi
t
h
s
o
m
e
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
o
n
s
o
u
t
h
s
i
d
e
.
Ye
s
,
dr
a
i
n
a
g
e
on
n
o
r
t
h
si
d
e
.
In
s
t
a
l
l
5
f
t
w
i
d
e
c
o
n
c
r
e
t
e
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
o
n
s
o
u
t
h
si
d
e
o
f
s
t
r
e
e
t
t
o
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
.
Ap
p
l
i
e
d
f
o
r
f
e
d
e
r
a
l
s
a
f
e
t
y
g
r
a
n
t
i
n
A
u
g
u
s
t
20
0
8
.
5
f
t
w
i
d
e
c
o
n
c
r
e
t
e
si
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
w
i
t
h
c
u
r
b
s
a
n
d
gu
t
t
e
r
s
.
$1
7
5
,
0
0
0
S7
1
8
9
t
h
P
l
S
W
8
0
t
h
A
v
e
W
7
8
t
h
A
v
e
W
7
0
0
N
a
r
r
o
w
,
d
i
s
c
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
a
s
p
h
a
l
t
s
h
o
u
l
d
e
r
s
mi
x
w
i
t
h
u
n
p
a
v
e
d
s
h
o
u
l
d
e
r
s
.
No
Co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
5
f
t
w
i
d
e
c
o
n
c
r
e
t
e
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
o
n
ei
t
h
e
r
s
i
d
e
o
f
s
t
r
e
e
t
.
5
f
t
w
i
d
e
c
o
n
c
r
e
t
e
si
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
w
i
t
h
c
u
r
b
s
a
n
d
gu
t
t
e
r
s
.
$1
4
0
,
0
0
0
S8
8
t
h
A
v
e
S
S
o
u
t
h
o
f
Wa
l
n
u
t
S
t
Wa
l
n
u
t
S
t
2
5
N
o
r
o
a
d
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
o
n
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
8
t
h
A
v
e
a
n
d
Wa
l
n
u
t
S
t
No
Co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
s
t
a
i
r
w
a
y
o
r
t
r
a
i
l
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
tw
o
r
o
a
d
s
.
St
a
i
r
w
a
y
o
r
A
s
p
h
a
l
t
t
r
a
i
l
.
$5
,
0
0
0
S9
8
4
t
h
A
v
e
W
1
8
8
t
h
S
t
S
W
1
8
6
t
h
S
t
S
W
7
0
0
U
n
p
a
v
e
d
,
u
n
s
t
r
i
p
e
d
s
h
o
u
l
d
e
r
s
o
n
b
o
t
h
si
d
e
s
w
i
t
h
v
a
r
i
o
u
s
w
i
d
t
h
s
.
No
In
s
t
a
l
l
5
f
t
w
i
d
e
c
o
n
c
r
e
t
e
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
o
n
e
a
s
t
si
d
e
o
f
s
t
r
e
e
t
t
o
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
t
o
th
e
s
o
u
t
h
.
A
d
d
e
d
g
e
l
i
n
e
s
o
n
b
o
t
h
s
i
d
e
s
o
f
st
r
e
e
t
.
5
f
t
w
i
d
e
c
o
n
c
r
e
t
e
si
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
w
i
t
h
c
u
r
b
s
a
n
d
gu
t
t
e
r
s
.
$1
4
0
,
0
0
0
S1
0
1
9
0
t
h
P
l
S
W
O
l
y
m
p
i
c
V
i
e
w
Dr
94
t
h
A
v
e
W
8
0
0
U
n
p
a
v
e
d
,
u
n
s
t
r
i
p
e
d
s
h
o
u
l
d
e
r
s
o
n
b
o
t
h
si
d
e
s
w
i
t
h
n
a
r
r
o
w
w
i
d
t
h
s
R
o
a
d
i
s
n
a
r
r
o
w
No
Co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
5
f
t
w
i
d
e
c
o
n
c
r
e
t
e
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
o
n
ei
t
h
e
r
s
i
d
e
o
f
s
t
r
e
e
t
A
d
d
e
d
g
e
l
i
n
e
s
o
n
b
o
t
h
5
f
t
w
i
d
e
c
o
n
c
r
e
t
e
si
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
w
i
t
h
c
u
r
b
s
a
n
d
Dr
si
d
e
s
w
i
t
h
n
a
r
r
o
w
w
i
d
t
h
s
.
Ro
a
d
i
s
n
a
r
r
o
w
.
ei
t
h
e
r
s
i
d
e
o
f
s
t
r
e
e
t
.
Ad
d
e
d
g
e
l
i
n
e
s
o
n
b
o
t
h
si
d
e
s
o
f
s
t
r
e
e
t
.
si
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
w
i
t
h
c
u
r
b
s
a
n
d
gu
t
t
e
r
s
.
$1
6
0
,
0
0
0
Lo
n
g
W
a
l
k
w
a
y
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
Packet Page 889 of 930
ID
S
t
r
e
e
t
N
a
m
e
F
r
o
m
T
o
Le
n
g
t
h
(f
e
e
t
)
D
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
G ut
t
e
r
/
Dr
a
i
n
a
g
e
/
Di
t
c
h
P
h
o
t
o
D
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
W
a
l
k
w
a
y
T
y
p
e
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
Co
s
t
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
Re
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
e
d
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
L1
2
3
4
t
h
S
t
S
W
/
23
6
t
h
S
t
S
W
97
t
h
P
l
W
S
R
1
0
4
3
,
1
0
0
2
3
4
t
h
S
t
S
W
-
U
n
p
a
v
e
d
,
u
n
s
t
r
i
p
e
d
sh
o
u
l
d
e
r
s
w
i
t
h
v
a
r
i
o
u
s
w
i
d
t
h
s
.
94
t
h
A
v
e
W
-
N
a
r
r
o
w
u
n
p
a
v
e
d
s
h
o
u
l
d
e
r
s
.
Ro
a
d
i
s
n
a
r
r
o
w
.
23
6
t
h
S
t
S
W
-
N
e
x
t
t
o
s
c
h
o
o
l
w
i
t
h
n
a
r
r
o
w
un
p
a
v
e
d
s
h
o
u
l
d
e
r
s
.
Ye
s
,
dr
a
i
n
a
g
e
.
23
4
t
h
S
t
S
W
-
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
5
f
t
w
i
d
e
c
o
n
c
r
e
t
e
si
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
o
n
s
o
u
t
h
s
i
d
e
o
f
s
t
r
e
e
t
.
94
t
h
A
v
e
W
-
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
5
f
t
w
i
d
e
c
o
n
c
r
e
t
e
si
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
o
n
w
e
s
t
s
i
d
e
o
f
s
t
r
e
e
t
.
23
6
t
h
S
t
S
W
-
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
5
f
t
w
i
d
e
c
o
n
c
r
e
t
e
si
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
o
n
s
o
u
t
h
s
i
d
e
o
f
s
t
r
e
e
t
(
c
o
n
s
i
s
t
e
n
t
wi
t
h
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
L
1
4
)
.
5
f
t
w
i
d
e
c
o
n
c
r
e
t
e
si
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
w
i
t
h
c
u
r
b
s
a
n
d
gu
t
t
e
r
s
.
$1
,
8
6
0
,
0
0
0
L2
M
a
p
l
e
w
o
o
d
D
r
M
a
i
n
S
t
2
0
0
t
h
S
t
S
W
2
,
7
0
0
U
n
p
a
v
e
d
s
h
o
u
l
d
e
r
s
o
n
b
o
t
h
s
i
d
e
s
w
i
t
h
so
m
e
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
f
o
r
n
e
w
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
s
o
n
we
s
t
s
i
d
e
.
No
Co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
5
f
t
w
i
d
e
c
o
n
c
r
e
t
e
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
o
n
we
s
t
s
i
d
e
o
f
s
t
r
e
e
t
.
5
f
t
w
i
d
e
c
o
n
c
r
e
t
e
si
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
w
i
t
h
c
u
r
b
s
a
n
d
gu
t
t
e
r
s
.
$5
4
0
,
0
0
0
L3
O
l
y
m
p
i
c
A
v
e
M
a
i
n
S
t
P
u
g
e
t
D
r
4
,
0
0
0
A sp
h
a
l
t
s
h
o
u
l
d
e
r
w
i
t
h
r
o
l
l
e
d
c
u
r
b
s
o
n
e
a
s
t
si
d
e
.
Ye
s
,
dr
a
i
n
a
g
e
.
Re
p
l
a
c
e
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
a
s
p
h
a
l
t
s
h
o
u
l
d
e
r
w
i
t
h
5
f
t
wi
d
e
c
o
n
c
r
e
t
e
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
o
n
e
a
s
t
s
i
d
e
o
f
st
r
e
e
t
.
5
f
t
w
i
d
e
c
o
n
c
r
e
t
e
si
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
w
i
t
h
c
u
r
b
s
a
n
d
gu
t
t
e
r
s
.
$1
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
L4
M
e
a
d
o
w
d
a
l
e
Be
a
c
h
R
d
76
t
h
A
v
e
W
O
l
y
m
p
i
c
V
i
e
w
Dr
3,
8
0
0
N
a
r
r
o
w
u
n
p
a
v
e
d
s
h
o
u
l
d
e
r
s
w
i
t
h
s
o
m
e
si
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
o
n
n
o
r
t
h
s
i
d
e
Ye
s
,
d
i
t
c
h
.
Co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
5
f
t
w
i
d
e
c
o
n
c
r
e
t
e
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
o
n
no
r
t
h
s
i
d
e
o
f
s
t
r
e
e
t
t
o
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
si
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
.
5
f
t
w
i
d
e
c
o
n
c
r
e
t
e
si
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
w
i
t
h
c
u
r
b
s
a
n
d
gu
t
t
e
r
s
.
$7
6
0
,
0
0
0
L5
P
i
n
e
S
t
9
t
h
A
v
e
W
S
R
1
0
4
4
,
0
0
0
C
o
n
c
r
e
t
e
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
o
n
b
o
t
h
s
i
d
e
s
(
w
e
s
t
en
d
)
o
r
s
o
u
t
h
s
i
d
e
o
n
l
y
(
e
a
s
t
e
n
d
)
No
In
s
t
a
l
l
5
f
t
w
i
d
e
c
o
n
c
r
e
t
e
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
o
n
s
o
u
t
h
si
d
e
o
f
s
t
r
e
e
t
t
o
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
5
f
t
w
i
d
e
c
o
n
c
r
e
t
e
si
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
w
i
t
h
c
u
r
b
s
a
n
d
en
d)
o
r
s
o
u
th
s
id
e
o
n
l y
(ea
s
t e
n
d)
.s
id
e
o
f s
t re
e
tt
o
c
o
n
n
e
c
t e
x
i s ti
ng
s
id
ew
a
lk
s.
s
id
ew
a
lk
s
w
it
h
c
u
r
b s
a
n
d
gu
t
t
e
r
s
.
$8
0
0
,
0
0
0
Packet Page 890 of 930
ID
S
t
r
e
e
t
N
a
m
e
F
r
o
m
T
o
Le
n
g
t
h
(f
e
e
t
)
D
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
G ut
t
e
r
/
Dr
a
i
n
a
g
e
/
Di
t
c
h
P
h
o
t
o
D
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
W
a
l
k
w
a
y
T
y
p
e
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
Co
s
t
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
Re
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
e
d
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
L6
8
0
t
h
A
v
e
W
/
18
0
t
h
S
t
W
18
8
t
h
S
t
S
W
O
V
D
3
,
0
0
0
U
n
p
a
v
e
d
s
h
o
u
l
d
e
r
s
o
n
b
o
t
h
s
i
d
e
s
w
i
t
h
si
g
h
t
d
i
s
t
a
n
c
e
i
s
s
u
e
s
.
No
I
n
s
t
a
l
l
5
f
t
w
i
d
e
c
o
n
c
r
e
t
e
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
o
n
w
e
s
t
si
d
e
o
f
s
t
r
e
e
t
.
5
f
t
w
i
d
e
c
o
n
c
r
e
t
e
si
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
w
i
t
h
c
u
r
b
s
a
n
d
gu
t
t
e
r
s
.
$7
5
0
,
0
0
0
L7
8
0
t
h
A
v
e
W
2
1
2
n
d
S
t
S
W
2
0
6
t
h
S
t
S
W
2
,
0
0
0
U
n
p
a
v
e
d
s
h
o
u
l
d
e
r
s
o
n
b
o
t
h
s
i
d
e
s
w
i
t
h
va
r
i
o
u
s
w
i
d
t
h
s
.
Ye
s
,
dr
a
i
n
a
g
e
.
In
s
t
a
l
l
5
f
t
w
i
d
e
c
o
n
c
r
e
t
e
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
o
n
e
i
t
h
e
r
si
d
e
o
f
s
t
r
e
e
t
t
o
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
t
o
th
e
n
o
r
t
h
a
n
d
s
o
u
t
h
5
f
t
w
i
d
e
c
o
n
c
r
e
t
e
si
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
w
i
t
h
c
u
r
b
s
a
n
d
gu
t
t
e
r
s
.
$5
0
0
,
0
0
0
L8
2
3
8
t
h
S
t
S
W
1
0
4
t
h
A
v
e
W
1
0
0
t
h
A
v
e
W
1
,
4
0
0
U
n
p
a
v
e
d
a
s
p
h
a
l
t
s
h
o
u
l
d
e
r
s
o
n
b
o
t
h
s
i
d
e
s
wi
t
h
v
a
r
i
o
u
s
w
i
d
t
h
s
.
No
In
s
t
a
l
l
5
f
t
w
i
d
e
c
o
n
c
r
e
t
e
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
o
n
n
o
r
t
h
si
d
e
o
f
s
t
r
e
e
t
(
c
o
n
s
i
s
t
e
n
t
w
i
t
h
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
L
1
8
)
.
5
f
t
w
i
d
e
c
o
n
c
r
e
t
e
si
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
w
i
t
h
c
u
r
b
s
a
n
d
gu
t
t
e
r
s
.
$8
4
0
,
0
0
0
L9
2
3
8
t
h
S
t
S
W
H
w
y
9
9
7
6
t
h
A
v
e
W
2
,
6
0
0
I
n
t
e
r
m
i
t
t
e
n
t
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
o
n
o
n
e
s
i
d
e
,
w
i
t
h
un
p
a
v
e
d
s
h
o
u
l
d
e
r
o
n
o
n
e
s
i
d
e
Ye
s
,
d
i
t
c
h
on
s
o
u
t
h
si
d
e
In
s
t
a
l
l
5
f
t
w
i
d
e
c
o
n
c
r
e
t
e
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
o
n
n
o
r
t
h
si
d
e
o
f
s
t
r
e
e
t
.
5
f
t
w
i
d
e
c
o
n
c
r
e
t
e
si
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
w
i
t
h
c
u
r
b
s
a
n
d
gu
t
t
e
r
s
.
$6
5
0
,
0
0
0
L1
0
2
3
2
n
d
S
t
W
1
0
0
t
h
A
v
e
W
9
7
t
h
A
v
e
W
1
,
0
0
0
W
i
d
e
r
u
n
p
a
v
e
d
s
h
o
u
l
d
e
r
s
o
n
s
o
u
t
h
s
i
d
e
,
N
o
Co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
5
f
t
w
i
d
e
c
o
n
c
r
e
t
e
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
o
n
5
f
t
wi
d
e
c
o
n
c
r
e
t
e
,
p,
an
d
n
a
r
r
o
w
u
n
p
a
v
e
d
s
h
o
u
l
d
e
r
s
o
n
n
o
r
t
h
si
d
e
.
so
u
t
h
s
i
d
e
o
f
s
t
r
e
e
t
.
si
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
w
i
t
h
c
u
r
b
s
a
n
d
gu
t
t
e
r
s
.
$2
0
0
,
0
0
0
Packet Page 891 of 930
ID
S
t
r
e
e
t
N
a
m
e
F
r
o
m
T
o
Le
n
g
t
h
(f
e
e
t
)
D
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
G ut
t
e
r
/
Dr
a
i
n
a
g
e
/
Di
t
c
h
P
h
o
t
o
D
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
W
a
l
k
w
a
y
T
y
p
e
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
Co
s
t
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
Re
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
e
d
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
L1
1
8
4
t
h
A
v
e
W
2
3
8
t
h
S
t
S
W
2
3
4
t
h
S
t
S
W
1
,
3
0
0
U
n
p
a
v
e
d
s
h
o
u
l
d
e
r
s
o
n
b
o
t
h
s
i
d
e
s
w
i
t
h
so
m
e
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
f
o
r
n
e
w
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
s
o
n
ea
s
t
s
i
d
e
o
n
t
h
e
s
o
u
t
h
e
n
d
.
No
In
s
t
a
l
l
5
f
t
w
i
d
e
c
o
n
c
r
e
t
e
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
o
n
e
a
s
t
si
d
e
o
f
s
t
r
e
e
t
t
o
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
t
o
th
e
s
o
u
t
h
.
5
f
t
w
i
d
e
c
o
n
c
r
e
t
e
si
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
w
i
t
h
c
u
r
b
s
a
n
d
gu
t
t
e
r
s
.
$2
6
0
,
0
0
0
L1
2
1
7
6
t
h
S
t
S
W
7
2
n
d
A
v
e
W
O
l
y
m
p
i
c
V
i
e
w
Dr
1,
4
0
0
U
n
p
a
v
e
d
,
u
n
s
t
r
i
p
e
d
s
h
o
u
l
d
e
r
s
o
n
b
o
t
h
si
d
e
s
w
i
t
h
v
a
r
i
o
u
s
w
i
d
t
h
s
.
N
o
s
h
o
u
l
d
e
r
s
to
w
a
r
d
e
a
s
t
e
n
d
.
Ye
s
,
dr
a
i
n
a
g
e
.
In
s
t
a
l
l
5
f
t
w
i
d
e
c
o
n
c
r
e
t
e
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
o
n
e
i
t
h
e
r
si
d
e
o
f
s
t
r
e
e
t
t
o
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
t
o
th
e
e
a
s
t
.
5
f
t
w
i
d
e
c
o
n
c
r
e
t
e
si
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
w
i
t
h
c
u
r
b
s
a
n
d
gu
t
t
e
r
s
.
$3
5
0
,
0
0
0
L1
3
1
8
8
t
h
S
t
S
W
9
2
n
d
A
v
e
W
8
8
t
h
A
v
e
W
1
,
0
0
0
U
n
p
a
v
e
d
s
h
o
u
l
d
e
r
s
o
n
b
o
t
h
s
i
d
e
s
w
i
t
h
va
r
i
o
u
s
w
i
d
t
h
s
.
Ye
s
,
d
i
t
c
h
on
n
o
r
t
h
si
d
e
.
In
s
t
a
l
l
5
f
t
w
i
d
e
c
o
n
c
r
e
t
e
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
o
n
s
o
u
t
h
si
d
e
o
f
s
t
r
e
e
t
t
o
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
t
o
th
e
e
a
s
t
.
5
f
t
w
i
d
e
c
o
n
c
r
e
t
e
si
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
w
i
t
h
c
u
r
b
s
a
n
d
gu
t
t
e
r
s
.
g
$2
0
0
,
0
0
0
L1
4
1
8
4
t
h
S
t
S
W
/
An
d
o
v
e
r
S
t
18
4
t
h
S
t
S
W
/
88
t
h
A
v
e
W
Ol
y
m
p
i
c
V
i
e
w
Dr
/
A
n
d
o
v
e
r
St
3,
5
0
0
1
8
4
t
h
S
t
S
W
-
U
n
p
a
v
e
d
s
h
o
u
l
d
e
r
s
o
n
bo
t
h
s
i
d
e
s
w
i
t
h
v
a
r
i
o
u
s
w
i
d
t
h
s
.
S
o
m
e
si
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
o
n
n
o
r
t
h
s
i
d
e
o
f
1
8
4
t
h
S
t
be
t
w
e
e
n
8
5
t
h
P
l
W
a
n
d
8
4
t
h
S
t
W
.
An
d
o
v
e
r
S
t
-
N
a
r
r
o
w
,
u
n
s
t
r
i
p
e
d
,
u
n
p
a
v
e
d
sh
o
u
l
d
e
r
s
o
n
b
o
t
h
s
i
d
e
s
.
Ye
s
,
dr
a
i
n
a
g
e
.
18
4
t
h
S
t
S
W
-
I
n
s
t
a
l
l
5
f
t
w
i
d
e
c
o
n
c
r
e
t
e
si
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
o
n
n
o
r
t
h
s
i
d
e
o
f
s
t
r
e
e
t
.
An
d
o
v
e
r
S
t
-
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
5
f
t
w
i
d
e
c
o
n
c
r
e
t
e
si
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
o
n
e
i
t
h
e
r
s
i
d
e
o
f
s
t
r
e
e
t
.
A
d
d
e
d
g
e
li
n
e
s
o
n
b
o
t
h
s
i
d
e
s
o
f
s
t
r
e
e
t
.
5
f
t
w
i
d
e
c
o
n
c
r
e
t
e
si
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
w
i
t
h
c
u
r
b
s
a
n
d
gu
t
t
e
r
s
.
$8
7
5
,
0
0
0
L1
5
7
2
n
d
A
v
e
W
O
l
y
m
p
i
c
V
i
e
w
Dr
17
6
t
h
S
t
S
W
2
,
9
0
0
U
n
p
a
v
e
d
,
u
n
s
t
r
i
p
e
d
s
h
o
u
l
d
e
r
s
o
n
b
o
t
h
si
d
e
s
w
i
t
h
v
a
r
i
o
u
s
w
i
d
t
h
s
.
Ye
s
,
dr
a
i
n
a
g
e
on
w
e
s
t
si
d
e
Co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
5
f
t
w
i
d
e
c
o
n
c
r
e
t
e
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
o
n
ei
t
h
e
r
s
i
d
e
o
f
s
t
r
e
e
t
.
A
d
d
e
d
g
e
l
i
n
e
s
o
n
b
o
t
h
si
d
e
s
o
f
s
t
r
e
e
t
.
5
f
t
w
i
d
e
c
o
n
c
r
e
t
e
si
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
w
i
t
h
c
u
r
b
s
a
n
d
gu
t
t
e
r
s
.
$7
2
5
,
0
0
0
Packet Page 892 of 930
ID
S
t
r
e
e
t
N
a
m
e
F
r
o
m
T
o
Le
n
g
t
h
(f
e
e
t
)
D
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
G ut
t
e
r
/
Dr
a
i
n
a
g
e
/
Di
t
c
h
P
h
o
t
o
D
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
W
a
l
k
w
a
y
T
y
p
e
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
Co
s
t
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
Re
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
e
d
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
L1
6
2
3
6
t
h
S
t
.
S
W
S
R
1
0
4
E
a
s
t
o
f
8
4
t
h
Av
e
W
2,
1
0
0
U
n
p
a
v
e
d
a
n
d
a
s
p
h
a
l
t
s
h
o
u
l
d
e
r
s
o
n
b
o
t
h
si
d
e
s
w
i
t
h
v
a
r
i
o
u
s
w
i
d
t
h
s
.
Ye
s
,
dr
a
i
n
a
g
e
.
In
s
t
a
l
l
5
f
t
w
i
d
e
c
o
n
c
r
e
t
e
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
o
n
n
o
r
t
h
si
d
e
o
f
s
t
r
e
e
t
(
c
o
n
s
i
s
t
e
n
t
w
i
t
h
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
L
1
)
.
5
f
t
w
i
d
e
c
o
n
c
r
e
t
e
si
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
w
i
t
h
c
u
r
b
s
a
n
d
gu
t
t
e
r
s
.
$5
2
5
,
0
0
0
L1
7
9
2
n
d
A
v
e
W
1
8
9
t
h
P
l
S
W
1
8
6
t
h
P
l
S
W
1
,
0
0
0
U
n
p
a
v
e
d
,
u
n
s
t
r
i
p
e
d
s
h
o
u
l
d
e
r
s
o
n
b
o
t
h
si
d
e
s
w
i
t
h
v
a
r
i
o
u
s
w
i
d
t
h
s
.
Ye
s
,
d
i
t
c
h
on
e
a
s
t
si
d
e
.
Co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
5
f
t
w
i
d
e
c
o
n
c
r
e
t
e
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
o
n
ei
t
h
e
r
s
i
d
e
o
f
s
t
r
e
e
t
.
A
d
d
e
d
g
e
l
i
n
e
s
o
n
b
o
t
h
si
d
e
s
o
f
s
t
r
e
e
t
.
5
f
t
w
i
d
e
c
o
n
c
r
e
t
e
si
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
w
i
t
h
c
u
r
b
s
a
n
d
gu
t
t
e
r
s
.
$2
0
0
,
0
0
0
L1
8
1
9
1
s
t
S
t
S
W
8
0
t
h
A
v
e
W
7
6
t
h
A
v
e
W
1
,
4
0
0
U
n
p
a
v
e
d
,
u
n
s
t
r
i
p
e
d
s
h
o
u
l
d
e
r
s
o
n
b
o
t
h
si
d
e
s
.
No
Co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
5
f
t
w
i
d
e
c
o
n
c
r
e
t
e
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
o
n
ei
t
h
e
r
s
i
d
e
o
f
s
t
r
e
e
t
.
A
d
d
e
d
g
e
l
i
n
e
s
o
n
b
o
t
h
si
d
e
s
o
f
s
t
r
e
e
t
.
5
f
t
w
i
d
e
c
o
n
c
r
e
t
e
si
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
w
i
t
h
c
u
r
b
s
a
n
d
gu
t
t
e
r
s
.
$2
8
0
,
0
0
0
L1
9
2
1
8
t
h
S
t
S
W
8
0
t
h
A
v
e
W
8
4
t
h
A
v
e
W
1
,
4
0
0
U
n
p
a
v
e
d
,
u
n
s
t
r
i
p
e
d
s
h
o
u
l
d
e
r
s
o
n
b
o
t
h
si
d
e
s
w
i
t
h
s
i
g
h
t
d
i
s
t
a
n
c
e
i
s
s
u
e
s
.
Ye
s
,
d
i
t
c
h
on
n
o
r
t
h
si
d
e
In
s
t
a
l
l
5
f
t
w
i
d
e
c
o
n
c
r
e
t
e
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
o
n
e
i
t
h
e
r
si
d
e
o
f
t
h
e
s
t
r
e
e
t
.
5
f
t
w
i
d
e
c
o
n
c
r
e
t
e
si
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
w
i
t
h
c
u
r
b
s
a
n
d
gu
t
t
e
r
s
.
$3
5
0
,
0
0
0
L2
0
1
9
2
n
d
S
t
S
W
8
8
t
h
A
v
e
W
8
4
t
h
A
v
e
W
1
,
3
0
0
U
n
p
a
v
e
d
a
n
d
a
s
p
h
a
l
t
s
h
o
u
l
d
e
r
m
i
x
w
i
t
h
id
l
k
f
d
l
t
b
t
Ye
s
,
d
i
t
c
h
.
Co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
o
r
r
e
a
l
i
g
n
5
f
t
w
i
d
e
c
o
n
c
r
e
t
e
id
l
k
i
t
h
i
d
f
t
t
t
t
5
f
t
w
i
d
e
c
o
n
c
r
e
t
e
id
l
k
i
t
h
b
d
si
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
f
r
o
m
n
e
w
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
s
,
b
u
t
sh
o
u
l
d
e
r
s
d
o
n
o
t
l
i
n
e
u
p
t
o
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
.
Ro
a
d
i
s
u
n
s
t
r
i
p
e
d
.
si
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
o
n
e
i
t
h
e
r
s
i
d
e
o
f
s
t
r
e
e
t
t
o
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
.
si
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
w
i
t
h
c
u
r
b
s
a
n
d
gu
t
t
e
r
s
.
$2
6
0
,
0
0
0
Packet Page 893 of 930
ID
S
t
r
e
e
t
N
a
m
e
F
r
o
m
T
o
Le
n
g
t
h
(f
e
e
t
)
D
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
G ut
t
e
r
/
Dr
a
i
n
a
g
e
/
Di
t
c
h
P
h
o
t
o
D
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
W
a
l
k
w
a
y
T
y
p
e
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
Co
s
t
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
Re
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
e
d
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
L2
1
1
0
4
t
h
A
v
e
W
/
Ro
b
i
n
H
o
o
d
D
r
23
8
t
h
S
t
S
W
1
0
6
t
h
A
v
e
W
2
,
2
0
0
A
s
p
h
a
l
t
s
h
o
u
l
d
e
r
s
o
n
w
e
s
t
s
i
d
e
,
a
n
d
na
r
r
o
w
u
n
p
a
v
e
d
s
h
o
u
l
d
e
r
s
o
n
e
a
s
t
s
i
d
e
.
No
In
s
t
a
l
l
5
f
t
w
i
d
e
c
o
n
c
r
e
t
e
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
o
n
w
e
s
t
si
d
e
o
f
s
t
r
e
e
t
t
o
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
t
o
th
e
p
a
r
k
(
c
o
n
s
i
s
t
e
n
t
w
i
t
h
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
L
7
)
.
5
f
t
w
i
d
e
c
o
n
c
r
e
t
e
si
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
w
i
t
h
c
u
r
b
s
a
n
d
gu
t
t
e
r
s
.
$4
4
0
,
0
0
0
L2
2
1
8
6
t
h
S
t
S
W
8
6
0
8
1
8
5
t
h
P
l
SW
Se
a
v
i
e
w
P
a
r
k
/
8
0
t
h
A
v
e
W
1,
7
0
0
U
n
p
a
v
e
d
,
u
n
s
t
r
i
p
e
d
s
h
o
u
l
d
e
r
s
o
n
b
o
t
h
si
d
e
s
w
i
t
h
v
a
r
i
o
u
s
w
i
d
t
h
s
.
S
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
o
n
no
r
t
h
s
i
d
e
i
n
f
r
o
n
t
o
f
S
e
a
v
i
e
w
p
a
r
k
o
n
t
h
e
ea
s
t
e
n
d
.
Ye
s
,
dr
a
i
n
a
g
e
.
In
s
t
a
l
l
5
f
t
w
i
d
e
c
o
n
c
r
e
t
e
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
o
n
n
o
r
t
h
si
d
e
o
f
s
t
r
e
e
t
t
o
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
t
o
th
e
w
e
s
t
a
n
d
e
a
s
t
.
A
d
d
e
d
g
e
l
i
n
e
s
o
n
b
o
t
h
si
d
e
s
o
f
s
t
r
e
e
t
.
5
f
t
w
i
d
e
c
o
n
c
r
e
t
e
si
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
w
i
t
h
c
u
r
b
s
a
n
d
gu
t
t
e
r
s
.
$4
2
5
,
0
0
0
L2
3
2
1
6
t
h
S
t
S
W
8
6
t
h
A
v
e
W
9
2
n
d
A
v
e
W
2
,
4
5
0
C
u
r
b
o
n
b
o
t
h
s
i
d
e
s
o
f
s
t
r
e
e
t
No
In
s
t
a
l
l
5
f
t
c
o
n
c
r
e
t
e
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
o
n
s
o
u
t
h
s
i
d
e
of
s
t
r
e
e
t
.
5
f
t
w
i
d
e
c
o
n
c
r
e
t
e
si
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
w
i
t
h
c
u
r
b
s
a
n
d
gu
t
t
e
r
s
.
$6
1
3
,
0
0
0
L2
4
9
2
n
d
A
v
e
W
B
o
w
d
o
i
n
W
a
y
2
2
0
t
h
S
t
S
W
2
,
2
5
0
U
n
m
a
r
k
e
d
a
n
d
u
n
p
a
v
e
d
s
h
o
u
l
d
e
r
.
N
o
I
n
s
t
a
l
l
5
f
t
c
o
n
c
r
e
t
e
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
o
n
e
i
t
h
e
r
s
i
d
e
o
f
st
r
e
e
t
.
5
f
t
w
i
d
e
c
o
n
c
r
e
t
e
si
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
w
i
t
h
c
u
r
b
s
a
n
d
gu
t
t
e
r
s
.
$5
6
3
,
0
0
0
Packet Page 894 of 930
Ci
t
y
o
f
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
Sh
o
r
t
W
a
l
k
w
a
y
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
S
e
l
e
c
t
i
o
n
M
a
t
r
i
x
Ped
estrian Safe
ty
RATI
NG =
WF x Pts
.
Connect
iv
ity-S
ervices
and F
acilities
RATI
NG =
WF x Pts
.
Connect
iv
ity-Lin
k
RATI
NG =
WF x Pts
.
Ac
tivit
y
RATI
NG =
WF x Pts
.
Comp
atib
ilit
y
RATI
NG =
WF x Pts
.
Enviro
nme
ntal
Impact
s
RATI
NG =
WF x
Pts
.
Pub
lic
Sup
por
t
RATI
NG =
WF x Pts
.
Dis
ta
n
ce
toSc
hool
RATI
NG =
WF X
Pts
Connect
iv
ity to t
ran
sit
routesa
nd facil
it
ie
s
RATI
NG =
WF x Pts
.
Ex
is
ting Infr
astructure
RATI
NG =
WF x Pts
.
Ra
n
k
i
n
g
ST
R
E
E
T
N
A
M
E
FR
O
M
TO
P
S
C
S
&
F
C
L
A
T
C
C
O
M
E
I
P
S
D S
CT
E I
Ap
p
r
o
x
i
m
a
t
e
T
O
T
A
L
P
R
I
O
R
I
T
Y
Pt
s
.
P
t
s
.
P
t
s
.
P
t
s
.
P
t
s
.
P
t
s
.
P
t
s
.
L
e
n
g
t
h
P
O
I
N
T
S
1
2n
d
A
v
.
Ma
i
n
S
t
.
J
a
m
e
s
S
t
.
31
5
3
1
2
3
9
3
9
3
3
3
3
3
6
1
1
2
2
3
3
10
0
'
63
1
2
Da
y
t
o
n
S
t
.
7t
h
A
v
.
S
8t
h
A
v
.
S
31
5
3
1
2
2
6
3
9
3
3
3
3
3
6
3
3
3
3
3
3
25
0
'
63
1
3
Ma
p
l
e
S
t
.
We
s
t
o
f
6
t
h
A
v
.
S
8t
h
A
v
.
S
31
5
3
1
2
3
9
2
6
3
3
3
3
3
6
2
2
3
3
3
3
25
0
'
62
1
4
Wa
l
n
u
t
S
t
.
6t
h
A
v
.
S
7t
h
A
v
.
S
31
5
2
8
2
6
2
6
3
3
3
3
3
6
1
1
3
3
3
3
70
0
'
54
1
5
Wa
l
n
u
t
S
t
.
3r
d
A
v
.
S
4t
h
A
v
.
S
31
5
2
8
2
6
2
6
3
3
3
3
3
6
1
1
3
3
2
2
35
0
'
53
1
6
22
6
t
h
S
t
.
S
W
10
6
t
h
A
v
.
W
SR
-
1
0
4
31
5
2
8
2
6
2
6
2
2
3
3
3
6
1
1
2
2
1
1
70
0
'
50
1
7
18
9
t
h
P
l
.
S
W
80
t
h
A
v
.
W
78
t
h
A
v
.
W
21
0
3
1
2
2
6
2
6
3
3
3
3
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
70
0
'
45
2
8
8t
h
A
v
.
Wa
l
n
u
t
A
v
.
So
u
t
h
o
f
W
a
l
n
u
t
21
0
2
8
2
6
2
6
2
2
3
3
1
2
1
1
2
2
3
3
??
?
?
43
2
9
84
t
h
A
v
.
W
18
8
t
h
S
t
.
S
W
18
6
t
h
S
t
.
S
W
15
2
8
3
9
2
6
3
3
3
3
2
4
3
3
1
1
1
1
70
0
'
43
2
10
19
0
t
h
P
l
.
S
W
94
t
h
A
v
.
W
OV
D
31
5
2
8
2
6
1
3
2
2
3
3
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
80
0
'
42
2
Ra
n
k
i
n
g
ST
R
E
E
T
N
A
M
E
FR
O
M
TO
Packet Page 895 of 930
Ci
t
y
o
f
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
Wa
l
k
w
a
y
R
o
u
t
e
S
e
l
e
c
t
i
o
n
M
a
t
r
i
x
Wa
l
k
w
a
y
S
e
l
e
c
t
i
o
n
C
r
i
t
e
r
i
a
:
We
i
g
h
t
i
n
g
F
a
c
t
o
r
(W
F
)
Pe
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
S
a
f
e
t
y
(
P
S
)
5
Co
n
n
e
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
-
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
a
n
d
F
a
c
il
i
t
i
e
s
(
C
S
&
F
)
4
Co
n
n
e
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
-
L
i
n
k
(
C
L
)
3
Ac
t
i
v
i
t
y
(
A
T
C
)
3
Pu
b
l
i
c
S
u
p
p
o
r
t
(
P
S
)
2
Co
m
p at
i
b
i
l
i
t
y(
CO
M
)
1
Co
m
p
a
t
i
b
i
l
i
t
y
(
C
O
M
)
1
En
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
I
m
p
a
c
t
s
(
E
I
)
1
Di
s
t
a
n
c
e
f
r
o
m
S
c
h
o
o
l
(
D
S
)
1
Co
n
n
e
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
t
o
t
r
a
n
s
i
t
r
o
u
t
e
s
a
n
d
f
a
c
il
i
t
i
e
s
(
C
T
)
1
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
I
n
f
r
a
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
(
E
I
)
1
P ede s trian Safety R ATING = WF x Pts.C onnectivit y -Serv i ce s a n d Facilitie s R ATING = WF x Pts.C onnectivit y -Link R ATING = WF x Pts.A c ti vity R ATING = WF x Pts.P ublic Supp o rt R ATING = WF x Pts.C ompatibili ty R ATING = WF x Pts.E nvironmental I mpacts R ATING = WF x Pts.D is t ance to Scho o l R ATING = WF X Pt s C onnectivit y to transi t r o utes a nd facilities R ATING = WF x Pts.E x i sting In fr a structur e R ATING = WF x Pts.P e R A C o R A C o R A A c R A P u R A C o R A E n R A D R A C o R A E x R A
Ra
n
k
i
n
g
St
r
e
e
t
N
a
m
e
Fr
o
m
T
o
P
S
C
S
&
F
C
L
A
T
C
P
S
C
O
M
E
I
D S
C T
E I
Ap
p
r
o
x
i
m
a
t
e
T
O
T
A
L
P
R
I
O
R
I
T
Y
Pt
s
.
P
t
s
.
P
t
s
.
P
t
s
.
P
t
s
.
P
t
s
.
P
t
s
.
P
t
s
.
P
t
s
.
P
t
s
.
Le
n
g
t
h
P
O
I
N
T
S
1
23
6
t
h
S
t
.
S
W
/
2
3
4
t
h
S
t
.
S
W
SR-10
4
9
7
t
h
P
l
.
W
3
1
5
3
1
2
3
9
3
9
3
6
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
3
3
31
0
0
'
65
1
2
Ma
p
l
e
w
o
o
d
D
r
.
Ma
i
n
S
t
.
20
0
t
h
S
t
.
S
W
3
1
5
3
1
2
39
3
9
3
6
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
3
3
27
0
0
'
64
1
3
Ol
y
m
p
i
c
A
v
.
Pu
g
e
t
D
r
.
Ma
i
n
S
t
.
3
1
5
3
1
2
39
3
9
3
6
3
3
2
2
3
3
2
2
1
1
40
0
0
'
62
1
4
Me
a
d
o
w
d
a
l
e
B
e
a
c
h
R
d
OVD
76th A
v
.
W
3
1
5
3
1
2
3
9
3
9
3
6
3
3
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
38
0
0
'
60
1
5
Pi
n
e
S
t
.
9th A
v
.
W
SR 1
0
4
3
1
5
3
1
2
3
9
3
9
2
4
3
3
3
3
1
1
1
1
2
2
40
0
0
'
59
1
6
80
t
h
A
v
.
W
/
1
8
0
t
h
S
t
.
S
W
18
8
t
h
S
t
.
S
W
OV
D
3
1
5
3
1
2
39
2
6
2
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
1
1
2
2
3,
0
0
0
'
58
1
Ra
n
k
i
n
g
7
80
t
h
A
v
.
W
20
6
t
h
S
t
.
S
W
2
1
2
n
d
S
t
.
S
W
3
1
5
28
3
9
3
9
2
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
1
1
20
0
0
'
58
1
8
23
8
t
h
S
t
.
S
W
10
0
t
h
A
v
.
W
10
4
t
h
A
v
.
W
31
5
3
1
2
3
9
2
6
3
6
2
2
3
3
1
1
2
2
1
1
14
0
0
'
57
1
9
23
8
t
h
S
t
.
S
W
Hw
y
.
9
9
76
t
h
A
v
.
W
31
5
3
1
2
3
9
3
9
1
2
2
2
3
3
1
1
2
2
1
1
2,
6
0
0
'
56
1
10
23
2
n
d
S
t
.
W
10
0
t
h
A
v
.
W
97
t
h
A
v
.
W
21
0
3
1
2
2
6
3
9
1
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
10
0
0
'
54
2
11
84
t
h
A
v
.
W
23
8
t
h
S
t
.
S
W
23
4
t
h
S
t
.
S
W
31
5
3
1
2
1
3
3
9
2
4
2
2
3
3
1
1
3
3
2
2
13
0
0
'
54
2
12
17
6
t
h
S
t
.
S
W
72
n
d
A
v
.
W
OV
D
21
0
3
1
2
3
9
2
6
2
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
1
1
2
2
14
0
0
'
53
2
Packet Page 896 of 930
Ci
t
y
o
f
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
Wa
l
k
w
a
y
R
o
u
t
e
S
e
l
e
c
t
i
o
n
M
a
t
r
i
x
Wa
l
k
w
a
y
S
e
l
e
c
t
i
o
n
C
r
i
t
e
r
i
a
:
We
i
g
h
t
i
n
g
F
a
c
t
o
r
(W
F
)
Pe
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
S
a
f
e
t
y
(
P
S
)
5
Co
n
n
e
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
-
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
a
n
d
F
a
c
il
i
t
i
e
s
(
C
S
&
F
)
4
Co
n
n
e
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
-
L
i
n
k
(
C
L
)
3
Ac
t
i
v
i
t
y
(
A
T
C
)
3
Pu
b
l
i
c
S
u
p
p
o
r
t
(
P
S
)
2
Co
m
p at
i
b
i
l
i
t
y(
CO
M
)
1
Co
m
p
a
t
i
b
i
l
i
t
y
(
C
O
M
)
1
En
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
I
m
p
a
c
t
s
(
E
I
)
1
Di
s
t
a
n
c
e
f
r
o
m
S
c
h
o
o
l
(
D
S
)
1
Co
n
n
e
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
t
o
t
r
a
n
s
i
t
r
o
u
t
e
s
a
n
d
f
a
c
il
i
t
i
e
s
(
C
T
)
1
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
I
n
f
r
a
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
(
E
I
)
1
P ede s trian Safety R ATING = WF x Pts.C onnectivit y -Serv i ce s a n d Facilitie s R ATING = WF x Pts.C onnectivit y -Link R ATING = WF x Pts.A c ti vity R ATING = WF x Pts.P ublic Supp o rt R ATING = WF x Pts.C ompatibili ty R ATING = WF x Pts.E nvironmental I mpacts R ATING = WF x Pts.D is t ance to Scho o l R ATING = WF X Pt s C onnectivit y to transi t r o utes a nd facilities R ATING = WF x Pts.E x i sting In fr a structur e R ATING = WF x Pts.P e R A C o R A C o R A A c R A P u R A C o R A E n R A D R A C o R A E x R A
Ra
n
k
i
n
g
St
r
e
e
t
N
a
m
e
Fr
o
m
T
o
P
S
C
S
&
F
C
L
A
T
C
P
S
C
O
M
E
I
D S
C T
E I
Ap
p
r
o
x
i
m
a
t
e
T
O
T
A
L
P
R
I
O
R
I
T
Y
Pt
s
.
P
t
s
.
P
t
s
.
P
t
s
.
P
t
s
.
P
t
s
.
P
t
s
.
P
t
s
.
P
t
s
.
P
t
s
.
Le
n
g
t
h
P
O
I
N
T
S
Ra
n
k
i
n
g
13
18
8
t
h
S
t
.
S
W
88
t
h
A
v
.
W
92
n
d
A
v
.
W
31
5
2
8
2
6
2
6
2
4
2
2
3
3
3
3
1
1
1
1
10
0
0
'
4
9
2
14
A
n
d
o
v
e
r
S
t
.
/
1
8
4
t
h
S
t
.
S
W
18
4
t
h
S
t
.
S
W
/
8
8
t
h
A
v
.
W
O
V
D
/
A
n
d
o
v
e
r
S
t
.
3
1
5
3
1
2
26
2
6
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
35
0
0
'
4
9
2
15
72
n
d
A
v
.
W
OV
D
17
6
t
h
S
t
.
S
W
2
1
0
3
1
2
26
2
6
2
4
2
2
2
2
1
1
3
3
1
1
29
0
0
'
4
7
2
16
23
6
t
h
S
t
.
S
W
SR-10
4
E
a
s
t
o
f
8
4
t
h
A
v
.
W
2
1
0
3
1
2
2
6
2
6
2
4
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
21
0
0
'
4
7
2
17
92
n
d
A
v
.
W
18
9
t
h
P
l
.
S
W
18
6
t
h
P
l
.
S
W
2
1
0
3
1
2
26
2
6
2
4
3
3
3
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
10
0
0
'
4
7
2
18
19
1
s
t
.
S
t
S
W
80th A
v
.
W
7
6
t
h
A
v
.
W
2
1
0
3
1
2
2
6
2
6
1
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
1
1
1
1
14
0
0
'
4
7
2
19
21
8
t
h
S
t
.
S
W
80th A
v
.
W
8
4
t
h
A
v
.
W
3
1
5
2
8
1
3
2
6
1
2
2
2
3
3
2
2
2
2
1
1
14
0
0
'
4
4
2
20
19
2
n
d
S
t
.
S
W
84th A
v
.
W
8
8
t
h
A
v
.
W
1
5
2
8
3
9
2
6
1
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
1
1
2
2
13
0
0
'
4
2
2
21
1
0
4
t
h
S
t
.
S
W
/
R
o
b
i
n
H
o
o
d
23
8
t
h
S
t
.
S
W
10
6
t
h
A
v
.
W
2
1
0
28
1
3
3
9
2
4
2
2
3
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
22
0
0
'
4
2
2
22
18
6
t
h
S
t
.
S
W
Se
a
v
i
e
w
P
a
r
k
8
6
0
8
1
8
5
t
h
P
l
S
W
15
2
8
2
6
2
6
1
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
1
1
1
1
17
0
0
'
3
7
2
23
21
6
t
h
S
t
.
S
W
86
t
h
A
v
.
W
92
n
d
A
v
.
W
15
2
8
1
3
2
6
0
0
1
1
3
3
3
3
1
1
1
1
2,
4
5
0
'
31
2
24
92
n
d
A
v
.
W
B
o
w
n
d
o
i
n
S
t
.
22
0
t
h
S
t
.
S
W
15
2
8
1
3
1
3
0
0
1
1
3
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
2,
2
5
0
'
26
2
Packet Page 897 of 930
City of Edmonds Comprehensive Transportation Plan
Example Funding Scenarios, 2010‐2025
Current Projection
Type* Project / Program Total Cost percent amount
Debt Service on 220th Street SW Project $ 616,600 100% $ 616,600
Future Transportation Plan Updates $ 600,000 100% $ 600,000
Maintenance & Preservation
238th / 100th Avenue Signal Upgrades Signal rebuild $ 118,000 100% $ 118,000
Annual Street Overlays 80 year maintenance cycle $ 27,200,000 25% $ 6,800,000
Citywide Street Improvements $ 240,000 25% $ 60,000
Citywide Signal Improvements $ 160,000 25% $ 40,000
Puget & Olympic View Drive Signal rebuild $ 198,000 0% $ -
Programs
Mini Transportation Management Center $ 3,000 100% $ 3,000
ADA Transition Plan 75 years to complete curb ramp retrofits $ 4,189,500 20% $ 837,900
Citywide Traffic Calming Program $ 160,000 0% $ -
Operational Enhancements $ 240,000 0% $ -
Pedestrian and Bicycle Programs/Projects
Bicycle Loop Signing Signage for three bicycle loops $ 25,000 100% $ 25,000
Interurban Trail Complete trail between Shoreline and MLT $ 1,535,000 100% $ 1,535,000
Citywide Walkway Projects 34 projects developed by walkway committee $ 14,699,000 20% $ 2,939,800
Citywide Bikeway Projects Projects developed by bike committee $ 120,000 20% $ 24,000
Downtown Bicycle Parking Install bicycle racks and lockers downtown $ 60,000 20% $ 12,000
Citywide Pedestrian Lighting $ 80,000 0% $ -
4th Avenue Corridor Enhancement Pedestrian improvements and amenities $ 5,500,000 0% $ -
Road Projects
s 228th Street SW, SR99 - 76th Avenue W Road connection, sidewalk, bike lanes, signal $ 3,948,200 100% $ 3,948,200
c09 Main Street / 9th Avenue N Install traffic signal $ 874,400 100% $ 874,400
c15 212th Street SW / 76th Avenue W Widen NB, SB, WB approaches, change phasing $ 2,313,800 100% $ 2,313,800
s Main St / 3rd Ave signal upgrade Traffic signal upgrade $ 138,000 100% $ 138,000
s 84th Avenue W, 212th Street SW - 238th Street SW Widen to 3 lanes, sidewalk $ 16,355,500 0% $ -
c09 212th Street SW / 84th Avenue W Install roundabout $ 1,910,100 100% $ 1,910,100
c09 Walnut Street / 9th Avenue S Install traffic signal $ 874,400 100% $ 874,400
c09 Puget Drive / 196th St SW / 88th Avenue W Install traffic signal $ 879,000 100% $ 879,000
c15 Olympic View Drive / 76th Avenue W Install traffic signal, widen WB approach $ 1,146,800 0% $ -
c25 220th Street SW / SR 99 Widen WB, SB approaches $ 3,147,300 0% $ -
c15 220th Street SW / 76th Avenue W Reconfigure EB approach, change phasing $ 138,300 0% $ -
c15 Caspers Street / 9th Avenue N Install traffic signal $ 818,000 0% $ -
c25 212th Street SW / SR 99 Widen EB, WB approaches, change phasing $ 3,265,500 0% $ -
s SR 99 Illumination Upgrade roadway illumination $ 400,000 0% $ -
hss 238th Street SW / Edmonds Way (SR 104) Install traffic signal and correct road skew $ 5 444 600 0% $
Funding Level
hss 238th Street SW / Edmonds Way (SR 104) Install traffic signal and correct road skew $ 5,444,600 0% $ -
s 216th Street / SR 99 Widen EB, WB approaches $ 719,800 0% $ -
c25 174th Street SW / Olympic View Drive Widen NB approach $ 724,200 0% $ -
s 238th Street SW, SR104 - 84th Avenue W Widen to 3 lanes, sidewalk $ 2,519,700 0% $ -
Shell Valley New access road $ 530,000 0% $ -
hss 244th Street SW (SR 104) / 76th Avenue W Widen WB approach, change phasing $ 3,321,600 0% $ -
TOTAL $ 105,213,300 $ 24,549,200
*Type: s = safety
c09 = concurrency by 2009 Key
c15 = concurrency by 2015 fully funded
c25 = concurrency by 2025 partially funded
hss = highway of statewide signficance not funded
Summary of Funding Scenario
Cost Amount Percent
Preservation and Maintenance 27,916,000$ 7,018,000$ 25%
Pedestrian Projects 20,279,000$ 2,939,800$ 14%
Bicycle Projects*1,740,000$ 1,596,000$ 92%
Road Projects 49,469,200$ 10,937,900$ 22%
ADA Transition Plan 4,189,500$ 837,900$ 20%
Traffic Calming Program 160,000$ -$ 0%
Other Programs/Projects 1,459,600$ 1,219,600$ 84%
Overall Plan 105,213,300$ 24,549,200$ 23%
*includes Interurban Trail, which is also a pedestrian project
Projected Revenue Unspent 3,788,441$ impact fee - no city funding available to cover balance
8,000,000$ joint agency - no city funding available to cover balance
4,819,641$ grant - no city matching funds
16,608,082$ total
Funded
Updated 6‐26‐2009 1
Packet Page 898 of 930
City of Edmonds Comprehensive Transportation Plan
Example Funding Scenarios, 2010‐2025
Current + $20 TBD
Type* Project / Program Total Cost percent amount
Debt Service on 220th Street SW Project $ 616,600 100% $ 616,600
Future Transportation Plan Updates $ 600,000 100% $ 600,000
Maintenance & Preservation
238th / 100th Avenue Signal Upgrades Signal rebuild $ 118,000 100% $ 118,000
Annual Street Overlays 50 year maintenance cycle $ 27,200,000 40% $ 10,880,000
Citywide Street Improvements $ 240,000 40% $ 96,000
Citywide Signal Improvements $ 160,000 40% $ 64,000
Puget & Olympic View Drive Signal rebuild $ 198,000 0% $ -
Programs
Mini Transportation Management Center $ 3,000 100% $ 3,000
ADA Transition Plan 38 years to complete curb ramp retrofits $ 4,189,500 40% $ 1,675,800
Citywide Traffic Calming Program $ 160,000 50% $ 80,000
Operational Enhancements $ 240,000 0% $ -
Pedestrian and Bicycle Programs/Projects
Bicycle Loop Signing Signage for three bicycle loops $ 25,000 100% $ 25,000
Interurban Trail Complete trail between Shoreline and MLT $ 1,535,000 100% $ 1,535,000
4th Avenue Corridor Enhancement Pedestrian improvements and amenities $ 5,500,000 100% $ 5,500,000
Citywide Walkway Projects 34 projects developed by walkway committee $ 14,699,000 30% $ 4,409,700
Citywide Bikeway Projects Projects developed by bike committee $ 120,000 50% $ 60,000
Downtown Bicycle Parking Install bicycle racks and lockers downtown $ 60,000 50% $ 30,000
Citywide Pedestrian Lighting $ 80,000 0% $ -
Road Projects
s 228th Street SW, SR99 - 76th Avenue W Road connection, sidewalk, bike lanes, signal $ 3,948,200 100% $ 3,948,200
c09 Main Street / 9th Avenue N Install traffic signal $ 874,400 100% $ 874,400
c15 212th Street SW / 76th Avenue W Widen NB, SB, WB approaches, change phasing $ 2,313,800 100% $ 2,313,800
s Main St / 3rd Ave signal upgrade Traffic signal upgrade $ 138,000 100% $ 138,000
s 84th Avenue W, 212th Street SW - 238th Street SW Widen to 3 lanes, sidewalk $ 16,355,500 0% $ -
c09 212th Street SW / 84th Avenue W Install roundabout $ 1,910,100 100% $ 1,910,100
c09 Walnut Street / 9th Avenue S Install traffic signal $ 874,400 100% $ 874,400
c09 Puget Drive / 196th St SW / 88th Avenue W Install traffic signal $ 879,000 100% $ 879,000
c15 Olympic View Drive / 76th Avenue W Install traffic signal, widen WB approach $ 1,146,800 100% $ 1,146,800
c25 220th Street SW / SR 99 Widen WB, SB approaches $ 3,147,300 100% $ 3,147,300
c15 220th Street SW / 76th Avenue W Reconfigure EB approach, change phasing $ 138,300 100% $ 138,300
c15 Caspers Street / 9th Avenue N Install traffic signal $ 818,000 100% $ 818,000
c25 212th Street SW / SR 99 Widen EB, WB approaches, change phasing $ 3,265,500 0% $ -
s SR 99 Illumination Upgrade roadway illumination $ 400,000 0% $ -
hss 238th Street SW / Edmonds Way (SR 104) Install traffic signal and correct road skew $ 5 444 600 0% $
Funding Level
hss 238th Street SW / Edmonds Way (SR 104) Install traffic signal and correct road skew $ 5,444,600 0% $ -
s 216th Street / SR 99 Widen EB, WB approaches $ 719,800 0% $ -
c25 174th Street SW / Olympic View Drive Widen NB approach $ 724,200 0% $ -
s 238th Street SW, SR104 - 84th Avenue W Widen to 3 lanes, sidewalk $ 2,519,700 0% $ -
Shell Valley New access road $ 530,000 0% $ -
hss 244th Street SW (SR 104) / 76th Avenue W Widen WB approach, change phasing $ 3,321,600 0% $ -
TOTAL $ 105,213,300 $ 41,881,400
*Type: s = safety
c09 = concurrency by 2009 Key
c15 = concurrency by 2015 fully funded
c25 = concurrency by 2025 partially funded
hss = highway of statewide signficance not funded
Summary of Funding Scenario
Cost Amount Percent
Preservation and Maintenance 27,916,000$ 11,158,000$ 40%
Pedestrian Projects 20,279,000$ 9,909,700$ 49%
Bicycle Projects*1,740,000$ 1,650,000$ 95%
Road Projects 49,469,200$ 16,188,300$ 33%
ADA Transition Plan 4,189,500$ 1,675,800$ 40%
Traffic Calming Program 160,000$ 80,000$ 50%
Other Programs/Projects 1,459,600$ 1,219,600$ 84%
Overall Plan 105,213,300$ 41,881,400$ 40%
*includes Interurban Trail, which is also a pedestrian project
Projected Revenue Unspent 1,635,777$ impact fee - no city funding available to cover balance
8,000,000$ joint agency - no city funding available to cover balance
1,235,521$ grant - no city matching funds
10,871,298$ total
Funded
Updated 6‐26‐2009 2
Packet Page 899 of 930
City of Edmonds Comprehensive Transportation Plan
Example Funding Scenarios, 2010‐2025
Current + $40 TBD
Type* Project / Program Total Cost percent amount
Debt Service on 220th Street SW Project $ 616,600 100% $ 616,600
Future Transportation Plan Updates $ 600,000 100% $ 600,000
Maintenance & Preservation
238th / 100th Avenue Signal Upgrades Signal rebuild $ 118,000 100% $ 118,000
Puget & Olympic View Drive Signal rebuild $ 198,000 100% $ 198,000
Annual Street Overlays 50 year maintenance cycle $ 27,200,000 50% $ 13,600,000
Citywide Street Improvements $ 240,000 50% $ 120,000
Citywide Signal Improvements $ 160,000 50% $ 80,000
Programs
Mini Transportation Management Center $ 3,000 100% $ 3,000
ADA Transition Plan 38 years to complete curb ramp retrofits $ 4,189,500 50% $ 2,094,750
Citywide Traffic Calming Program $ 160,000 50% $ 80,000
Operational Enhancements $ 240,000 0% $ -
Pedestrian and Bicycle Programs/Projects
Bicycle Loop Signing Signage for three bicycle loops $ 25,000 100% $ 25,000
Interurban Trail Complete trail between Shoreline and MLT $ 1,535,000 100% $ 1,535,000
4th Avenue Corridor Enhancement Pedestrian improvements and amenities $ 5,500,000 100% $ 5,500,000
Citywide Pedestrian Lighting $ 80,000 100% $ 80,000
Citywide Walkway Projects 34 projects developed by walkway committee $ 14,699,000 40% $ 5,879,600
Citywide Bikeway Projects Projects developed by bike committee $ 120,000 75% $ 90,000
Downtown Bicycle Parking Install bicycle racks and lockers downtown $ 60,000 75% $ 45,000
Road Projects
s 228th Street SW, SR99 - 76th Avenue W Road connection, sidewalk, bike lanes, signal $ 3,948,200 100% $ 3,948,200
c09 Main Street / 9th Avenue N Install traffic signal $ 874,400 100% $ 874,400
c15 212th Street SW / 76th Avenue W Widen NB, SB, WB approaches, change phasing $ 2,313,800 100% $ 2,313,800
s Main St / 3rd Ave signal upgrade Traffic signal upgrade $ 138,000 100% $ 138,000
s 84th Avenue W, 212th Street SW - 238th Street SW Widen to 3 lanes, sidewalk $ 16,355,500 100% $ 16,355,500
c09 212th Street SW / 84th Avenue W Install roundabout $ 1,910,100 100% $ 1,910,100
c09 Walnut Street / 9th Avenue S Install traffic signal $ 874,400 100% $ 874,400
c09 Puget Drive / 196th St SW / 88th Avenue W Install traffic signal $ 879,000 100% $ 879,000
c15 Olympic View Drive / 76th Avenue W Install traffic signal, widen WB approach $ 1,146,800 100% $ 1,146,800
c25 220th Street SW / SR 99 Widen WB, SB approaches $ 3,147,300 0% $ -
c15 220th Street SW / 76th Avenue W Reconfigure EB approach, change phasing $ 138,300 0% $ -
c15 Caspers Street / 9th Avenue N Install traffic signal $ 818,000 0% $ -
c25 212th Street SW / SR 99 Widen EB, WB approaches, change phasing $ 3,265,500 0% $ -
s SR 99 Illumination Upgrade roadway illumination $ 400,000 0% $ -
hss 238th Street SW / Edmonds Way (SR 104) Install traffic signal and correct road skew $ 5,444,600 0% $ -
s 216th Street / SR 99 Widen EB, WB approaches $ 719,800 0% $ -
c25 174th Street SW / Olympic View Drive Widen NB approach $ 724,200 0% $ -
s 238th Street SW, SR104 - 84th Avenue W Widen to 3 lanes, sidewalk $ 2,519,700 0% $ -
Shell Valley New access road $ 530,000 0% $ -
hss 244th Street SW (SR 104) / 76th Avenue W Widen WB approach, change phasing $ 3,321,600 0% $ -
TOTAL $ 105,213,300 $ 59,105,150
*Type: s = safety
c09 = concurrency by 2009 Key
c15 = concurrency by 2015 fully funded
c25 = concurrency by 2025 partially funded
hss = highway of statewide signficance not funded
Summary of Funding Scenario
Cost Amount Percent
Preservation and Maintenance 27,916,000$ 14,116,000$ 51%
Pedestrian Projects 20,279,000$ 11,459,600$ 60%
Bicycle Projects*1,740,000$ 1,695,000$ 97%
Road Projects 49,469,200$ 28,440,200$ 57%
ADA Transition Plan 4,189,500$ 2,094,750$ 50%
Traffic Calming Program 160,000$ 80,000$ 100%
Other Programs/Projects 1,459,600$ 1,219,600$ 100%
Overall Plan 105,213,300$ 59,105,150$ 57%
*includes Interurban Trail, which is also a pedestrian project
Projected Revenue Unspent 3,318,253$ impact fee - no city funding available to cover balance
-$ joint agency - no city funding available to cover balance
240,256$ grant - no city matching funds
3,558,509$ total
Funding Level
Funded
Updated 6‐26‐2009 2
Packet Page 900 of 930
City of Edmonds Comprehensive Transportation Plan
Example Funding Scenarios, 2010‐2025
Current + $60 TBD
Type* Project / Program Total Cost percent amount
Debt Service on 220th Street SW Project $ 616,600 100% $ 616,600
Future Transportation Plan Updates $ 600,000 100% $ 600,000
Maintenance & Preservation
238th / 100th Avenue Signal Upgrades Signal rebuild $ 118,000 100% $ 118,000
Puget & Olympic View Drive Signal rebuild $ 198,000 100% $ 198,000
Citywide Street Improvements $ 240,000 100% $ 240,000
Citywide Signal Improvements $ 160,000 100% $ 160,000
Annual Street Overlays 27 year maintenance cycle $ 27,200,000 80% $ 21,760,000
Programs
Mini Transportation Management Center $ 3,000 100% $ 3,000
Citywide Traffic Calming Program $ 160,000 100% $ 160,000
Operational Enhancements $ 240,000 100% $ 240,000
ADA Transition Plan 25 years to complete curb ramp retrofits $ 4,189,500 75% $ 3,142,125
Pedestrian and Bicycle Programs/Projects
Bicycle Loop Signing Signage for three bicycle loops $ 25,000 100% $ 25,000
Interurban Trail Complete trail between Shoreline and MLT $ 1,535,000 100% $ 1,535,000
4th Avenue Corridor Enhancement Pedestrian improvements and amenities $ 5,500,000 100% $ 5,500,000
Citywide Pedestrian Lighting $ 80,000 100% $ 80,000
Citywide Bikeway Projects Projects developed by bike committee $ 120,000 100% $ 120,000
Downtown Bicycle Parking Install bicycle racks and lockers downtown $ 60,000 100% $ 60,000
Citywide Walkway Projects 34 projects developed by walkway committee $ 14,699,000 50% $ 7,349,500
Road Projects
s 228th Street SW, SR99 - 76th Avenue W Road connection, sidewalk, bike lanes, signal $ 3,948,200 100% $ 3,948,200
c09 Main Street / 9th Avenue N Install traffic signal $ 874,400 100% $ 874,400
c15 212th Street SW / 76th Avenue W Widen NB, SB, WB approaches, change phasing $ 2,313,800 100% $ 2,313,800
s Main St / 3rd Ave signal upgrade Traffic signal upgrade $ 138,000 100% $ 138,000
s 84th Avenue W, 212th Street SW - 238th Street SW Widen to 3 lanes, sidewalk $ 16,355,500 100% $ 16,355,500
c09 212th Street SW / 84th Avenue W Install roundabout $ 1,910,100 100% $ 1,910,100
c09 Walnut Street / 9th Avenue S Install traffic signal $ 874,400 100% $ 874,400
c09 Puget Drive / 196th St SW / 88th Avenue W Install traffic signal $ 879,000 100% $ 879,000
c15 Olympic View Drive / 76th Avenue W Install traffic signal, widen WB approach $ 1,146,800 100% $ 1,146,800
c25 220th Street SW / SR 99 Widen WB, SB approaches $ 3,147,300 100% $ 3,147,300
c15 220th Street SW / 76th Avenue W Reconfigure EB approach, change phasing $ 138,300 100% $ 138,300
c15 Caspers Street / 9th Avenue N Install traffic signal $ 818,000 100% $ 818,000
c25 212th Street SW / SR 99 Widen EB, WB approaches, change phasing $ 3,265,500 0% $ -
s SR 99 Illumination Upgrade roadway illumination $ 400,000 0% $ -
hss 238th Street SW / Edmonds Way (SR 104) Install traffic signal and correct road skew $ 5,444,600 0% $ -
s 216th Street / SR 99 Widen EB, WB approaches $ 719,800 0% $ -
c25 174th Street SW / Olympic View Drive Widen NB approach $ 724,200 0% $ -
s 238th Street SW, SR104 - 84th Avenue W Widen to 3 lanes, sidewalk $ 2,519,700 0% $ -
Shell Valley New access road $ 530,000 0% $ -
hss 244th Street SW (SR 104) / 76th Avenue W Widen WB approach, change phasing $ 3,321,600 0% $ -
TOTAL $ 105,213,300 $ 74,451,025
*Type: s = safety
c09 = concurrency by 2009 Key
c15 = concurrency by 2015 fully funded
c25 = concurrency by 2025 partially funded
hss = highway of statewide signficance not funded
Summary of Funding Scenario
Cost Amount Percent
Preservation and Maintenance 27,916,000$ 22,476,000$ 81%
Pedestrian Projects 20,279,000$ 12,929,500$ 64%
Bicycle Projects*1,740,000$ 1,740,000$ 100%
Road Projects 49,469,200$ 32,543,800$ 66%
ADA Transition Plan 4,189,500$ 3,142,125$ 75%
Traffic Calming Program 160,000$ 160,000$ 100%
Other Programs/Projects 1,459,600$ 1,459,600$ 100%
Overall Plan 105,213,300$ 74,451,025$ 71%
*includes Interurban Trail, which is also a pedestrian project
Projected Revenue Unspent 1,635,777$ impact fee - no city funding available to cover balance
-$ joint agency - no city funding available to cover balance
13,169$ grant - no city matching funds
1,648,946$ total
Funding Level
Funded
Updated 6‐26‐2009 3
Packet Page 901 of 930
City of Edmonds Comprehensive Transportation Plan
Example Funding Scenarios, 2010‐2025
Current + $80 TBD
Type* Project / Program Total Cost percent amount
Debt Service on 220th Street SW Project $ 616,600 100% $ 616,600
Future Transportation Plan Updates $ 600,000 100% $ 600,000
Maintenance & Preservation
238th / 100th Avenue Signal Upgrades Signal rebuild $ 118,000 100% $ 118,000
Puget & Olympic View Drive Signal rebuild $ 198,000 100% $ 198,000
Citywide Street Improvements $ 240,000 100% $ 240,000
Citywide Signal Improvements $ 160,000 100% $ 160,000
Annual Street Overlays 22 year maintenance cycle $ 27,200,000 90% $ 24,480,000
Programs
Mini Transportation Management Center $ 3,000 100% $ 3,000
Citywide Traffic Calming Program $ 160,000 100% $ 160,000
Operational Enhancements $ 240,000 100% $ 240,000
ADA Transition Plan 19 years to complete curb ramp retrofits $ 4,189,500 80% $ 3,351,600
Pedestrian and Bicycle Programs/Projects
Bicycle Loop Signing Signage for three bicycle loops $ 25,000 100% $ 25,000
Interurban Trail Complete trail between Shoreline and MLT $ 1,535,000 100% $ 1,535,000
4th Avenue Corridor Enhancement Pedestrian improvements and amenities $ 5,500,000 100% $ 5,500,000
Citywide Pedestrian Lighting $ 80,000 100% $ 80,000
Citywide Bikeway Projects Projects developed by bike committee $ 120,000 100% $ 120,000
Downtown Bicycle Parking Install bicycle racks and lockers downtown $ 60,000 100% $ 60,000
Citywide Walkway Projects 34 projects developed by walkway committee $ 14,699,000 80% $ 11,759,200
Road Projects
s 228th Street SW, SR99 - 76th Avenue W Road connection, sidewalk, bike lanes, signal $ 3,948,200 100% $ 3,948,200
c09 Main Street / 9th Avenue N Install traffic signal $ 874,400 100% $ 874,400
c15 212th Street SW / 76th Avenue W Widen NB, SB, WB approaches, change phasing $ 2,313,800 100% $ 2,313,800
s Main St / 3rd Ave signal upgrade Traffic signal upgrade $ 138,000 100% $ 138,000
s 84th Avenue W, 212th Street SW - 238th Street SW Widen to 3 lanes, sidewalk $ 16,355,500 100% $ 16,355,500
c09 212th Street SW / 84th Avenue W Install roundabout $ 1,910,100 100% $ 1,910,100
c09 Walnut Street / 9th Avenue S Install traffic signal $ 874,400 100% $ 874,400
c09 Puget Drive / 196th St SW / 88th Avenue W Install traffic signal $ 879,000 100% $ 879,000
c15 Olympic View Drive / 76th Avenue W Install traffic signal, widen WB approach $ 1,146,800 100% $ 1,146,800
c25 220th Street SW / SR 99 Widen WB, SB approaches $ 3,147,300 100% $ 3,147,300
c15 220th Street SW / 76th Avenue W Reconfigure EB approach, change phasing $ 138,300 100% $ 138,300
c15 Caspers Street / 9th Avenue N Install traffic signal $ 818,000 100% $ 818,000
c25 212th Street SW / SR 99 Widen EB, WB approaches, change phasing $ 3,265,500 100% $ 3,265,500
s SR 99 Illumination Upgrade roadway illumination $ 400,000 100% $ 400,000
hss 238th Street SW / Edmonds Way (SR 104) Install traffic signal and correct road skew $ 5 444 600 0% $
Funding Level
hss 238th Street SW / Edmonds Way (SR 104) Install traffic signal and correct road skew $ 5,444,600 0% $ -
s 216th Street / SR 99 Widen EB, WB approaches $ 719,800 0% $ -
c25 174th Street SW / Olympic View Drive Widen NB approach $ 724,200 0% $ -
s 238th Street SW, SR104 - 84th Avenue W Widen to 3 lanes, sidewalk $ 2,519,700 0% $ -
Shell Valley New access road $ 530,000 0% $ -
hss 244th Street SW (SR 104) / 76th Avenue W Widen WB approach, change phasing $ 3,321,600 0% $ -
TOTAL $ 105,213,300 $ 85,455,700
*Type: s = safety
c09 = concurrency by 2009 Key
c15 = concurrency by 2015 fully funded
c25 = concurrency by 2025 partially funded
hss = highway of statewide signficance not funded
Summary of Funding Scenario
Cost Amount Percent
Preservation and Maintenance 27,916,000$ 25,196,000$ 90%
Pedestrian Projects 20,279,000$ 17,339,200$ 86%
Bicycle Projects*1,740,000$ 1,740,000$ 100%
Road Projects 49,469,200$ 36,209,300$ 77%
ADA Transition Plan 4,189,500$ 3,351,600$ 80%
Traffic Calming Program 160,000$ 160,000$ 100%
Other Programs/Projects 1,459,600$ 1,459,600$ 100%
Overall Plan 105,213,300$ 85,455,700$ 83%
*includes Interurban Trail, which is also a pedestrian project
Projected Revenue Unspent -$ impact fee - no city funding available to cover balance
-$ joint agency - no city funding available to cover balance
-$ grant - no city matching funds
-$ total
Funded
Updated 6‐26‐2009 4
Packet Page 902 of 930
Ci
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
B
r
i
e
f
i
n
g
Ju
l
y
2
1
,
2
0
0
9
Ci
t
y
o
f
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
S
t
a
f
f
/
I
C
F
J
o
n
e
s
&
S
t
o
k
e
s
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
90
3
of
93
0
Tr
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
U
p
d
a
t
e
–
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
B
r
i
e
f
i
n
g
Tr
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
o
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
Fi
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
o
u
t
l
o
o
k
a
n
d
p
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
f
u
n
d
i
n
g
st
r
a
t
e
g
i
e
s
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
s
f
o
r
P
l
a
n
r
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
Ne
x
t
s
t
e
p
s
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
90
4
of
93
0
Tr
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
U
p
d
a
t
e
–
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
B
r
i
e
f
i
n
g
Co
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
R
e
v
i
e
w
D
r
a
f
t
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
(
J
u
n
e
)
Re
v
i
e
w
e
d
b
y
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
B
o
a
r
d
,
a
g
e
n
c
i
e
s
,
a
n
d
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
m em
b
e
r
s
Co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
i
n
v
o
l
v
e
m
e
n
t
Th
r
e
e
o
p
e
n
h
o
u
s
e
s
–
f
i
n
a
l
h
e
l
d
o
n
J
u
n
e
3
0
Ci
t
i
z
e
n
c
o
m
m
i
t
t
e
e
s
-
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
,
W
a
l
k
w
a
y
,
B
i
k
e
G
r
o
up,
Pa
r
k
i
n
g
Pr
e
s
e
n
t
e
d
t
o
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
B
o
a
r
d
Pu
b
l
i
c
h
e
a
r
i
n
g
c
o
n
d
u
c
t
e
d
o
n
J
u
n
e
1
0
Bo
a
r
d
p
a
s
s
e
d
r
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
t
o
f
o
r
w
a
r
d
P
l
a
n
t
o
C
i
t
y
C ou
n
c
i
l
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
90
5
of
93
0
Tr
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
U
p
d
a
t
e
–
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
B
r
i
e
f
i
n
g
Pu
r
p
o
s
e
o
f
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
Gu
i
d
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
o
f
m
u
l
t
i
m
o
d
a
l
t
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
Id
e
n
t
i
f
y
t
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
i
n
f
r
a
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
/
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
n
e
e
d
ed to
su
p
p
o
r
t
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
’
s
:
ad
o
p
t
e
d
l
a
n
d
u
s
e
p
l
a
n
ad
o
p
t
e
d
t
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
g
o
a
l
s
a
n
d
p
o
l
i
c
i
e
s
Tr
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
s
Tr
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
G
o
a
l
s
,
O
b
j
e
c
t
i
v
e
s
,
P
o
l
i
c
i
e
s
St
r
e
e
t
S
y
s
t
e
m
No
n
-
M
o
t
o
r
i
z
e
d
S
y
s
t
e
m
Tr
a
n
s
i
t
a
n
d
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
D
e
m
a
n
d
M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
Im
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
F
i
n
a
n
c
e
P
l
a
n
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
90
6
of
93
0
Tr
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
U
p
d
a
t
e
–
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
B
r
i
e
f
i
n
g
Ed
m
o
n
d
s
p
o
p
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
/
e
m
p
l
o
y
m
e
n
t
r
e
f
l
e
c
t
e
d
i
n
P
l
a
n
Pl
u
s
e
f
f
e
c
t
o
f
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
e
d
r
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
g
r
o
w
t
h
o
n
tr
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
w
i
t
h
i
n
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
Ne
w
t
r
a
v
e
l
d
e
m
a
n
d
f
o
r
e
c
a
s
t
i
n
g
m
o
d
e
l
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
e
d
Re
f
l
e
c
t
s
b
u
i
l
d
-
o
u
t
o
f
C
i
t
y
’
s
a
d
o
p
t
e
d
2
0
2
5
l
a
n
d
u
s
e
p
lan
Pr
o
v
i
d
e
s
b
a
s
i
s
f
o
r
u
p
d
a
t
e
d
i
m
p
a
c
t
f
e
e
s
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
(
2
0
0
8
)
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
(
2
0
0
8
)
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
(
2
0
0
8
)
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
(
2
0
0
8
)
20
2
5
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
o
n
20
2
5
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
o
n
20
2
5
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
o
n
20
2
5
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
o
n
Growth GrowthGrowth Growth
Po
p
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
~4
0
,
0
0
0
44
,
8
8
0
>12%
Em
p
l
o
y
m
e
n
t
~1
0
,
4
0
0
12
,
1
9
0
>17%
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
90
7
of
93
0
Tr
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
U
p
d
a
t
e
–
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
B
r
i
e
f
i
n
g
Fu
t
u
r
e
p
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
y
e
a
r
2
0
2
5
i
n
s
t
e
a
d
o
f
2
0
2
2
St
r
o
n
g
e
r
e
m
p
h
a
s
i
s
o
n
n
o
n
-
m
o
t
o
r
i
z
e
d
t
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
Co
m
p
r
i
s
e
~
2
5
%
o
f
p
l
a
n
c
o
s
t
,
i
n
s
t
e
a
d
o
f
~
5
%
i
n
l
a
s
t
p
la
n
Co
s
t
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
r
e
f
l
e
c
t
h
i
g
h
e
r
p
e
r
u
n
i
t
p
r
i
c
e
s
As
r
e
f
l
e
c
t
e
d
i
n
t
r
e
n
d
s
i
n
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
c
o
s
t
s
o
v
e
r
p
a
s
t
s
e
ve
r
a
l
y
e
a
r
s
Ed
m
o
n
d
s
C
r
o
s
s
i
n
g
M
u
l
t
i
m
o
d
a
l
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
No
t
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
d
i
n
C
i
t
y
f
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
p
l
a
n
(
n
o
p
l
a
n
n
e
d
C
i
t
y
e
x
p
e
n
d
i
t
u
r
e
s
)
St
i
l
l
p
l
a
n
n
e
d
a
s
a
l
o
n
g
r
a
n
g
e
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
Up
d
a
t
e
d
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
i
m
p
a
c
t
f
e
e
$1
,
0
7
1
/
t
r
i
p
,
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
d
f
r
o
m
$
7
6
4
/
t
r
i
p
Ad
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
Tr
a
f
f
i
c
C
a
l
m
i
n
g
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
AD
A
C
u
r
b
R
a
m
p
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
90
8
of
93
0
Tr
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
U
p
d
a
t
e
–
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
B
r
i
e
f
i
n
g
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
Co
n
c
u
r
r
e
n
c
y
S
t
a
t
e
l
a
w
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
s
t
h
a
t
t
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
s
y
s
t
e
m
i
s
a
d
e
q
u
a
t
e
t
o
s
u
p
p
o
r
t
p
l
a
n
n
e
d
l
a
n
d
u
s
e
,
a
s
m
e
a
s
u
r
e
d
b
y
a
d
o
p
t
e
d
l
e
v
e
l
o
f
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
4
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
c
o
n
c
u
r
r
e
n
c
y
d
e
f
i
c
i
e
n
c
i
e
s
4
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
b
y
2
0
1
5
3
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
b
y
2
0
2
5
Sa
f
e
t
y
Hi
g
h
w
a
y
o
f
S
t
a
t
e
w
i
d
e
S
i
g
n
i
f
i
c
a
n
c
e
Tr
a
f
f
i
c
C
a
l
m
i
n
g
Ma
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
a
n
d
P
r
e
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
90
9
of
93
0
Tr
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
U
p
d
a
t
e
–
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
B
r
i
e
f
i
n
g
Wa
l
k
w
a
y
P
l
a
n
Ne
w
w
a
l
k
w
a
y
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
10
s
h
o
r
t
w
a
l
k
w
a
y
s
(
<
1
,
0
0
0
f
e
e
t
)
24
l
o
n
g
w
a
l
k
w
a
y
s
(
1
,
0
0
0
f
e
e
t
)
4t
h
A
v
e
n
u
e
E
n
h
a
n
c
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
AD
A
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
(
c
u
r
b
r
a
m
p
r
e
t
r
o
f
i
t
s
)
Bi
k
e
w
a
y
P
l
a
n
Lo
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
f
o
r
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
b
i
k
e
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
Si
g
n
i
n
g
o
f
3
(
s
h
o
r
t
,
m
e
d
i
u
m
,
l
o
n
g
)
b
i
k
e
l
o
o
p
s
Re
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
e
d
b
i
k
e
r
o
u
t
e
s
“S
h
a
r
r
o
w
”
p
a
v
e
m
e
n
t
m
a
r
k
i
n
g
s
i
n
d
i
c
a
t
e
s
h
a
r
e
d
u
s
e
o f
r
o
a
d
b
y
v
e
h
i
c
l
e
s
a
n
d
b
i
c
y
c
l
e
s
Pr
o
v
i
d
e
s
e
p
a
r
a
t
e
b
i
k
e
l
a
n
e
s
w
h
e
r
e
f
e
a
s
i
b
l
e
a s
p
a
r
t
o
f
f
u
t
u
r
e
r
o
a
d
w
a
y
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
In
t
e
r
u
r
b
a
n
T
r
a
i
l
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
i
o
n
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
91
0
of
93
0
Tr
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
U
p
d
a
t
e
–
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
B
r
i
e
f
i
n
g
Ci
t
y
p
o
l
i
c
i
e
s
s
u
p
p
o
r
t
Ad
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
a
n
d
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
d
b
u
s
s he
l
t
e
r
s
Ad
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
t
r
a
n
s
i
t
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
Tr
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
D
e
m
a
n
d
M an
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
No
d
i
r
e
c
t
t
r
a
n
s
i
t
i
n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
s
by
C
i
t
y
a
r
e
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
l
y
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
d
in
t
h
e
P
l
a
n
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
91
1
of
93
0
Tr
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
U
p
d
a
t
e
–
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
B
r
i
e
f
i
n
g
To
t
a
l
C
o
s
t
=
$
1
0
5
,
2
1
3
,
3
0
0
20
1
0
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
2
0
2
5
(c
u
r
r
e
n
t
d
o
l
l
a
r
s
)
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
91
2
of
93
0
Tr
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
U
p
d
a
t
e
–
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
B
r
i
e
f
i
n
g
Re
v
e
n
u
e
f
r
o
m
i
d
e
n
t
i
f
i
e
d
so
u
r
c
e
s
=
$
4
0
,
9
0
6
,
6
1
1
So
u
r
c
e
s
Gr
a
n
t
s
Mo
t
o
r
V
e
h
i
c
l
e
F
u
e
l
T
a
x
Tr
a
f
f
i
c
I
m
p
a
c
t
F
e
e
s
*
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
s
f
r
o
m
O
t
h
e
r
F
u
n
d
s
Ut
i
l
i
t
y
R
e
s
u
r
f
a
c
i
n
g
Jo
i
n
t
A
g
e
n
c
y
In
t
e
r
e
s
t
I
n
c
o
m
e
Re
a
l
E
s
t
a
t
e
E
x
c
i
s
e
T
a
x
*Up
d
a
t
e
d
I
m
p
a
c
t
F
e
e
=
$
1
,
0
7
1
p
e
r
t
r
i
p
*U
p
d
a
t
e
d
I
m
p
a
c
t
F
e
e
=
$
1
,
0
7
1
p
e
r
t
r
i
p
*U
p
d
a
t
e
d
I
m
p
a
c
t
F
e
e
=
$
1
,
0
7
1
p
e
r
t
r
i
p
*U
p
d
a
t
e
d
I
m
p
a
c
t
F
e
e
=
$
1
,
0
7
1
p
e
r
t
r
i
p
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
91
3
of
93
0
Tr
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
U
p
d
a
t
e
–
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
B
r
i
e
f
i
n
g
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
e
d
r
e
v
e
n
u
e
w
o
u
l
d
f
u
n
d
~
2
3
%
o
f
P
l
a
n
Ro
a
d
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
2
2
%
f
u
n
d
e
d
(
c
o
n
c
u
r
r
e
n
c
y
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
n
o
t
f
ully funded)
Pe
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
a
n
d
b
i
c
y
c
l
e
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
2
1
%
f
u
n
d
e
d
St
r
e
e
t
o
v
e
r
l
a
y
s
o
n
8
0
-
y
e
a
r
i
n
s
t
e
a
d
o
f
2
0
-
y
e
a
r
c
y
c
l
e
AD
A
c
u
r
b
r
a
m
p
r
e
t
r
o
f
i
t
–
7
5
y
e
a
r
s
t
o
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
Tr
a
f
f
i
c
c
a
l
m
i
n
g
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
u
n
f
u
n
d
e
d
Ap
p
r
o
x
i
m
a
t
e
l
y
$
1
6
m
i
l
l
i
o
n
“
l
e
f
t
o
n
t
a
b
l
e
”
Im
p
a
c
t
f
e
e
s
,
j
o
i
n
t
a
g
e
n
c
y
f
u
n
d
s
,
a
n
d
g
r
a
n
t
f
u
n
d
i
n
g
a
ll require
Ci
t
y
s
h
a
r
e
t
o
f
u
n
d
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
Ci
t
y
’
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
e
d
“
o
t
h
e
r
”
f
u
n
d
i
n
g
i
n
s
u
f
f
i
c
i
e
n
t
t
o
m
e
e
t
C
i
t
y
s
h
a
r
e
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
91
4
of
93
0
Tr
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
U
p
d
a
t
e
–
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
B
r
i
e
f
i
n
g
Tr
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
B
e
n
e
f
i
t
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
(
T
B
D
)
Ad
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
v
e
h
i
c
l
e
l
i
c
e
n
s
e
f
e
e
u
p
t
o
$
8
0
(
f
o
r
t
o
t
a
l
o
f
$
1
0
0
)
a
l
l
o
w
e
d
un
d
e
r
l
a
w
,
w
i
t
h
v
o
t
e
r
a
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
Ap
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
e
f
u
n
d
i
n
g
l
e
v
e
l
,
a
n
d
s
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
t
o
b
e
f
u
n
d
e
d
,
wo
u
l
d
b
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
e
d
a
s
p
a
r
t
o
f
a
t
o
t
a
l
f
u
n
d
i
n
g
p
a
c
k
a
g
e
,
p
r
i
o
r
t
o
pu
t
t
i
n
g
t
o
v
o
t
e
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
e
d
T
B
D
r
e
v
e
n
u
e
i
n
e
x
a
m
p
l
e
f
u
n
d
i
n
g
s
c
e
n
a
r
i
o
s
i
s
b
a
s
e
d
u
p
o
n
th
e
f
o
l
l
o
w
i
n
g
a
s
s
u
m
p
t
i
o
n
s
…
40
,
0
0
0
p
o
p
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
x
0
.
9
1
=
3
6
,
4
0
0
l
i
c
e
n
s
e
d
v
e
h
i
c
l
e
s
x $
8
0
/
v
e
h
i
c
l
e
/
y
e
a
r
=
$
2
,
9
1
2
,
0
0
0
/
y
e
a
r
x
1
6
y
e
a
r
s
=
$
4
6
,
5
9
2
,
0
0
0
m
a
x
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
2
0
2
5
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
91
5
of
93
0
Tr
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
U
p
d
a
t
e
–
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
B
r
i
e
f
i
n
g
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
e
d
t
o
t
a
l
r
e
v
e
n
u
e
2
0
1
0
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
2
0
2
5
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
C
u
r
r
e
n
t
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
+ + + +
$2
0
T
B
D
$2
0
T
B
D
$
2
0
T
B
D
$2
0
T
B
D
+ + + +
$4
0
T
B
D
$4
0
T
B
D
$
4
0
T
B
D
$4
0
T
B
D
++++
$6
0
T
B
D
$6
0
T
B
D
$
6
0
T
B
D
$6
0
T
B
D
++++$80 TBD $80 TBD$80 TBD $80 TBD
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
e
d
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
$4
0
.
9
M
$5
2
.
6
M
$6
4
.
2
M
$7
5
.
9
M
$87.5M
Av
g
.
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
/
Y
e
a
r
$2
.
6
M
$3
.
3
M
$4
.
0
M
$4
.
7
M
$5.5M
%
o
f
P
l
a
n
F
u
n
d
e
d
23
%
40
%
57
%
71
%
83%
Ro
a
d
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
22
%
33
%
57
%
66
%
77%
No
n
-
M
o
t
o
r
i
z
e
d
21
%
52
%
60
%
67
%
87%
St
r
e
e
t
O
v
e
r
l
a
y
s
80
-
y
r
50
-
y
r
40
-
y
r
25
-
y
r
22-yr
AD
A
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
i
o
n
75
-
y
r
38
-
y
r
30
-
y
r
20
-
y
r
19-yr
Tr
a
f
f
i
c
C
a
l
m
i
n
g
0%
50
%
10
0
%
10
0
%
100%
Le
f
t
o
n
T
a
b
l
e
$1
6
.
6
M
$1
0
.
9
M
$3
.
6
M
$1
.
6
M
$0
**
D
o
e
s
n
o
t
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
$
2
0
T
B
D
,
w
h
i
c
h
h
a
s
b
e
e
n
d
e
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
t
o
C
i
t
y
tr
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
,
a
n
d
w
i
l
l
n
o
t
b
e
u
s
e
d
t
o
f
u
n
d
c
a
p
i
t
a
l
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
91
6
of
93
0
Tr
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
U
p
d
a
t
e
–
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
B
r
i
e
f
i
n
g
$8
0
T
B
D
(
a
d
d
e
d
t
o
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
$
2
0
T
B
D
c
o
m
m
i
t
t
e
d
t
o
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
)
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
e
d
t
o
g
e
n
e
r
a
t
e
u
p
t
o
$
4
6
m
i
l
l
i
o
n
o
v
e
r
1
6
y
e
a
r
s
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
e
d
t
o
e
n
a
b
l
e
a
p
p
r
o
x
i
m
a
t
e
l
y
$
6
3
m
i
l
l
i
o
n
a
d
d
i
t
i
on
a
l
t
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
in
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
o
v
e
r
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
f
u
n
d
i
n
g
Ea
c
h
$
1
.
0
0
$1
.
3
5
i
n
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
t
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
i
n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
Th
i
s
i
l
l
u
s
t
r
a
t
e
s
o
r
d
e
r
o
f
m
a
g
n
i
t
u
d
e
ba
s
e
d
u
p
o
n
t
h
e
E
x
a
m
p
l
e
F
u
n
d
i
n
g
Sc
e
n
a
r
i
o
s
.
A
c
t
u
a
l
l
e
v
e
r
a
g
e
w
i
l
l
d
e
p
e
n
d
o
n
m
i
x
o
f
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
a
n
d
av
a
i
l
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
o
f
g
r
a
n
t
s
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
e
x
t
e
r
n
a
l
f
u
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
.
Ad
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
p
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
r
e
v
e
n
u
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
t
o
c
l
o
s
e
f
u
n
d
i
n
g
g
a
p
:
Ad
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
g
r
a
n
t
f
u
n
d
i
n
g
(
m
o
r
e
f
e
a
s
i
b
l
e
w
i
t
h
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
na
l
a
v
a
i
l
a
b
l
e
C
i
t
y
f
u
n
d
s
)
Hi
g
h
e
r
r
e
v
e
n
u
e
f
r
o
m
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
(
e
.
g
.
R
E
E
T
)
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
91
7
of
93
0
Tr
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
U
p
d
a
t
e
–
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
B
r
i
e
f
i
n
g
Ap
p
r
o
v
e
P
l
a
n
w
i
t
h
r
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
t
o
p
u
r
s
u
e
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
fu
n
d
i
n
g
i
n
f
u
t
u
r
e
.
Fu
n
d
i
n
g
l
e
v
e
l
a
n
d
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
t
o
b
e
f
u
n
d
e
d
w
o
u
l
d
b
e
d
e
v
el
o
p
e
d
a
s
p
a
r
t
of
t
o
t
a
l
f
u
n
d
i
n
g
p
a
c
k
a
g
e
Ap
p
r
o
v
e
P
l
a
n
w
i
t
h
r
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
f
o
r
n
o
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
f
u
n
d
i
n
g
an
d
o
n
e
o
r
m
o
r
e
o
f
t
h
e
f
o
l
l
o
w
i
n
g
f
u
t
u
r
e
a
c
t
i
o
n
s
:
Lo
w
e
r
C
i
t
y
c
o
n
c
u
r
r
e
n
c
y
s
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
s
Re
v
i
s
e
C
i
t
y
p
o
l
i
c
i
e
s
t
o
s
u
p
p
o
r
t
l
o
w
e
r
l
e
v
e
l
o
f
n
o
n
-
m
ot
o
r
i
z
e
d
in
f
r
a
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
Lo
w
e
r
C
i
t
y
’
s
l
e
v
e
l
o
f
c
o
m
m
i
t
m
e
n
t
t
o
m
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
a
n
d
pr
e
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
Re
v
i
s
e
f
u
t
u
r
e
l
a
n
d
u
s
e
p
l
a
n
t
o
r
e
f
l
e
c
t
l
o
w
e
r
l
e
v
e
l
o
f
f
u
t
u
r
e
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
a
n
d
/
o
r
s
h
i
f
t
s
i
n
l
a
n
d
u
s
e
d
e
n
s
i
t
i
e
s
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
91
8
of
93
0
Tr
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
U
p
d
a
t
e
–
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
B
r
i
e
f
i
n
g
Ag
e
n
c
y
r
e
v
i
e
w
o
f
d
r
a
f
t
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
(
u
n
d
e
r
w
a
y
)
Wa
s
h
i
n
g
t
o
n
S
t
a
t
e
D
e
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
o
f
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
,
T
r
a
d
e
a
n
d
Ec
o
n
o
m
i
c
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
(
C
T
E
D
)
Pu
g
e
t
S
o
u
n
d
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
(
P
S
R
C
)
Wa
s
h
i
n
g
t
o
n
S
t
a
t
e
D
e
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
o
f
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
W
S
D
O
T
)
Sn
o
h
o
m
i
s
h
C
o
u
n
t
y
a
n
d
a
d
j
a
c
e
n
t
c
i
t
i
e
s
In
c
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
e
f
e
e
d
b
a
c
k
f
r
o
m
a
g
e
n
c
i
e
s
,
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
,
a
n
d
Co
u
n
c
i
l
i
n
t
o
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
e
d
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
Co
u
n
c
i
l
D
e
c
i
s
i
o
n
s
Re
q
u
e
s
t
p
u
b
l
i
c
h
e
a
r
i
n
g
o
n
A
u
g
u
s
t
4
A ug
u
s
t
4
A
u
g
u
s
t
4
Au
g
u
s
t
4
a
n
d
a
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
o
f
P
l
a
n
a
t
t
h
a
t
t
i
m
e
Ad
o
p
t
a
s
p
a
r
t
o
f
a
n
n
u
a
l
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
u
p
d
a
t
e
–
A
ut
u
m
n
2
0
0
9
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
91
9
of
93
0
AM-2408 8.
Discussion regarding 523 Alder Building
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:07/21/2009
Submitted By:Rob Chave, Planning
Submitted For:City Council Time:20 Minutes
Department:Planning Type:Information
Review Committee:
Committee Action:
Information
Subject Title
Discussion regarding 523 Alder Building.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
No action is required.
Previous Council Action
N/A
Narrative
The new building at 523 Alder in Edmonds has drawn notice and questions from citizens for its
configuration/design. Rob Chave and Ann Bullis will give a presentation to explain how this
building meets current code. This may foster a conversation among Council about whether this is
the Council’s vision for the current zoning, and what elements of this development might be
broadened or reduced in future Council zoning changes.
The building is located within an RM-1.5 zone. Approved building site plan and elevations are
attached as Exhibit 1. A memo from Rob Chave & Ann Bullis responding to issues identified in
a citizen inquiry is attached as Exhibit 2.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: Exhibit 1: Project Drawings
Link: Exhibit 2: Staff memo on issues raised
Link: Exhibit 3: Photographs
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 07/16/2009 03:20 PM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 07/16/2009 03:23 PM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 07/17/2009 08:29 AM APRV
Form Started By: Rob
Chave
Started On: 07/16/2009 02:56
PM
Packet Page 920 of 930
Final Approval Date: 07/17/2009
Packet Page 921 of 930
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
92
2
of
93
0
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
92
3
of
93
0
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
92
4
of
93
0
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
92
5
of
93
0
Page 1 of 2
Date: July 14, 2009
To: City Council
Mayor
From: Rob Chave, Planning Manager
Ann Bullis, Building Official
Subject: 523 Alder Street
Response to citizen comments sent via email
This memo is provided to address permitting concerns raised in the following e-mail received
from Robert Palen on July 13, 2009:
To all,
regarding the ongoing complaint / concern about the new construction at 523 Alder St., it
was brought to my attention by a couple of owners this weekend that there is what
appears to be a mother - in law area (separate living space) inside the building. Is this
allowed in a multi family zone? There appear to be 2 entrances ( on the 1st floor to the
west & the second floor to the east (the mother -in -law unit is on the first floor with the
garage.) Roofing eaves have been added over the eastern entrance. These eaves, I am
sure, extend out past the allowable set back limit as does the overhang on the main roof.
Finally, the vaulted interior of the third floor means the the living area (not just roof
structure) exceeds the 25' limit. I feel that all of these issues and many others regarding
design & compatibility with the surrounding area need to be addressed and the overall
permitting reviewed.
I'm concerned that structures such as this may become the norm rather than the
exception in the downtown & bowl area. Aesteticaly (sp) and character-wise, I do not feel
that they are compatible with the area. The general feeling is that this particular
structure resembles a three story single-wide mobile home.
Sincerey,
Robert C Palen
Robert C Palen
Vice President
Mariner Homeowners Assoc
533 Alder St A-7
Edmonds WA 98020
MEMORANDUM
Packet Page 926 of 930
Page 2 of 2
Staff Response:
Accessory Dwelling Unit: The project is located within a multi family RM-1.5 zone. The
RM-1.5 zone permits “single family dwellings” as a permitted primary use, and also
permits “all permitted secondary uses in the RS zone, if in conjunction with a single-
family dwelling.” Since accessory dwelling units are a permitted secondary use in the
single famly RS zones, this means that an accessory dwelling unit is potentially
permittable as part of this project. However, the building permit (BLD20080474) for
construction of the subject single family residence, was issued for one dwelling unit only.
The following condition was placed on the permit prior to issuance:
The subject property is not approved for an Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU). Should the
property owner (current or future) wish to use a portion of the residence as a separate
dwelling, accessory to the primary dwelling, the applicant must comply with the
regulations of ECDC 20.21 and obtain the required permits.
There is nothing prohibiting a residence from having more than one entrance. If the
current or future property owners desire to have an Accessory Dwelling Unit, they must
first obtain a Conditional Use Permit and Building Compliance Permit to do so.
Eave Projection into Setback: ECDC 16.30.040 allow eaves to project into the required
setback not more than 30 inches. The approved plans show compliance to this code and
will be checked by the Building Inspector during the framing inspection.
Maximum Allowable Height: In the RM1.5 zone, the maximum height allowed is 25 feet
plus an additional 5 feet for portions of the roof that have a slope of 4:12 or greater
(ECDC 16.30.030(A)). The height of the building is measured from the average grade to
the highest point of the structure. The definition of height (ECDC 21.40.030) does not
address the height of the “living area” within the structure. By definition, living space is
not regulated by the zone’s height restrictions – only the configuration of the roof.
On July 9, 2009 the contractor requested a height inspection. City Building Inspector
measured the height of the building based on the approved plans for the project and found
it to be 2 inches under the maximum allowable height.
Packet Page 927 of 930
Packet Page 928 of 930
AM-2396 10.
Report on City Council Committee Meetings
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:07/21/2009
Submitted By:Sandy Chase, City Clerk's Office Time:10 Minutes
Department:City Clerk's Office Type:Information
Review Committee:
Committee Action:
Information
Subject Title
Report on City Council Committee Meetings of July 14, 2009.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
N/A
Previous Council Action
N/A
Narrative
The Finance Committee met on July 14, 2009. Attached is a copy of the minutes.
Note: The Community Services/Development Services Committee and the Public Safety
Committee did not meet on July 14.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: 07-14-09 Finance Committee Minutes
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 07/15/2009 03:20 PM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 07/15/2009 04:00 PM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 07/15/2009 04:04 PM APRV
Form Started By: Sandy
Chase
Started On: 07/15/2009 03:12
PM
Final Approval Date: 07/15/2009
Packet Page 929 of 930
FINANCE COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES
July 14, 2009
6:00 PM
V:\WORDATA\FINANCE COMM MINUTES\07-14-09 FINANCE COMMITTEE.DOC
Present: Councilmember Wambolt
Councilmember Plunkett
Staff: Noel Miller
Debra Sharp
Kathleen Junglov
Public: Roger Hertrich
Diane Buckshnis
Councilmember Wambolt called the meeting to order at 6:00 PM.
Item A: Authorization to Salvage Surplus Water and Wastewater Parts
Noel Miller, Public Works Director briefed the committee on the need to surplus items
and on the proposed method of disposition. Committee members forwarded this to full
Council as a Consent Agenda item.
Item B: Proposed Equipment Rental Hourly Rates
Debra Sharp provided background on the proposed equipment rental hourly rates
including the fact that these rates will be the rates used to charge the Transportation
Benefit District. Committee members forwarded this to full Council as a Consent
Agenda item.
Item C. 2009 Second Quarter Budget Report
Kathleen Junglov provided an overview of the 2009 Second Quarter Budget Report
noting General Fund Revenues were at 50.03% of forecast and General Fund
Expenditures were at 49.1% of forecast. For information only, no further action required.
Adjournment - The meeting was adjourned at 6:09 PM.
Packet Page 930 of 930