2009.10.27 CC Agenda Packet
AGENDA
Edmonds City Council
Council Chambers, Public Safety Complex
250 5th Ave. North, Edmonds
______________________________________________________________
OCTOBER 27, 2009
7:00 p.m.
Call to Order and Flag Salute
1. Approval of Agenda
2. Approval of Consent Agenda Items
A. Roll Call
B. AM-2565 Approval of City Council Meeting Minutes of October 20, 2009.
C. AM-2564 Approval of claim checks #114865 through #114981 dated October 22, 2009 for
$537,990.94. Approval of payroll direct deposits and checks #48678 through #48713 for the
pay period October 1 through October 15, 2009 for $819,291.29.
D. AM-2563 Approval of list of businesses applying for renewal of their liquor licenses with the
Washington State Liquor Control Board, September and October 2009.
E. AM-2567 Community Services and Economic Development Quarterly Report –October, 2009.
F. AM-2568 Adoption of an Ordinance amending the Edmonds Community Development Code to add a
new Chapter 16.100 Firdale Village Mixed-Use Zoning Criteria, and a new Chapter 22.100
Firdale Village Site Design Standards.
G. AM-2561 Proclamation in honor of Finding an End to Poverty Week, November 2 - 8, 2009.
H. AM-2562 Proclamation in honor of Diabetes Awareness Month, November 2009.
3. (5 Minutes)Confirmation of Mayor's appointment to the position of Finance Director.
4. AM-2566
(30 Minutes)
Public hearing on Fire District 1 Contract, Option 4. In addition to contracting for
services with Fire District 1, this option includes selling apparatus (engines, aid cars, and
equipment), and keeping fire stations, land and transport fees.
5. (60 Minutes)City Council discussion on Fire District 1 Contract, Option 4.
6.Audience Comments (3 minute limit per person)*
*Regarding matters not listed on the Agenda as Closed Record Review or as Public Hearings.
7. (15 Minutes)Council reports on outside committee/board meetings.
8. (5 Minutes)Mayor's Comments
Packet Page 1 of 225
9. (15 Minutes)Council Comments
ADJOURN
Packet Page 2 of 225
AM-2565 2.B.
Approve 10-20-09 City Council Meeting Minutes
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:10/27/2009
Submitted By:Sandy Chase Time:Consent
Department:City Clerk's Office Type:Action
Review Committee:
Committee Action:
Information
Subject Title
Approval of City Council Meeting Minutes of October 20, 2009.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
It is recommended that the City Council review and approve the draft minutes.
Previous Council Action
N/A
Narrative
Attached is a copy of the draft minutes.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: 10-20-09 Draft City Council Minutes
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 10/22/2009 08:51 AM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 10/22/2009 08:52 AM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 10/22/2009 08:54 AM APRV
Form Started By: Sandy
Chase
Started On: 10/22/2009 08:49
AM
Final Approval Date: 10/22/2009
Packet Page 3 of 225
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
October 20, 2009
Page 1
EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL DRAFT MINUTES
October 20, 2009
The Edmonds City Council meeting was called to order at 7:05 p.m. by Mayor Haakenson in the Council
Chambers, 250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds. The meeting was opened with the flag salute.
ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT
Gary Haakenson, Mayor
D. J. Wilson, Council President
Michael Plunkett, Councilmember
Peggy Pritchard Olson, Councilmember
Steve Bernheim, Councilmember
Dave Orvis, Councilmember
Ron Wambolt, Councilmember
Strom Peterson, Councilmember
STAFF PRESENT
Tom Tomberg, Fire Chief
Mark Correira, Assistant Fire Chief
Al Compaan, Police Chief
Stephen Clifton, Community Services/Economic
Development Director
Brian McIntosh, Parks & Recreation Director
Noel Miller, Public Works Director
Lorenzo Hines, Interim Finance Director
Debi Humann, Human Resources Director
Rob Chave, Planning Manager
Frances Chapin, Cultural Services Manager
Steve Koho, Treatment Plant Manager
Rob English, City Engineer
Bertrand Hauss, Transportation Engineer
Scott Snyder, City Attorney
Sandy Chase, City Clerk
Jana Spellman, Senior Executive Council Asst.
Jeannie Dines, Recorder
1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
COUNCILMEMBER WAMBOLT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BERNHEIM,
TO APPROVE THE AGENDA IN CONTENT AND ORDER, ADDING “AUTHORIZE STAFF TO
REMOVE FOUR TREES AT THE NORTH CORNER OF 5TH & DAYTON” AS AGENDA ITEM
8B. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
2. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS
COUNCILMEMBER WAMBOLT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BERNHEIM,
TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. The agenda
items approved are as follows:
A. ROLL CALL
B. APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF OCTOBER 6, 2009.
C. APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF OCTOBER 13, 2009.
D. APPROVAL OF CLAIM CHECKS #114535 THROUGH #114703 DATED OCTOBER 8,
2009 FOR $820,758.42, AND #114704 THROUGH #114864 FOR $561,991.99 DATED
OCTOBER 15, 2009. APPROVAL OF PAYROLL DIRECT DEPOSITS AND CHECKS
#48634 THROUGH #48675 FOR THE PAY PERIOD SEPTEMBER 16 THROUGH
SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 FOR $806,648.57.
Packet Page 4 of 225
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
October 20, 2009
Page 2
E. ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT OF CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES FROM SHEJANA TSANEV
AND GERALDINE HEISEY (AMOUNTS UNDETERMINED).
F. SURPLUS OF COMPUTERS AND MONITORS AND DONATION TO
INTERCONNECTION.
G. REPORT ON BIDS OPENED ON OCTOBER 6, 2009 FOR THE PURCHASE OF
TREATMENT PLANT CHEMICALS AND AWARD TO JONES CHEMICAL, INC. FOR
SUPPLYING SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE AND SODIUM HYDROXIDE.
H. AUTHORIZATION FOR MAYOR TO SIGN ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO THE
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH BROWN & CALDWELL FOR THE
ODOR CONTROL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FOR $90,558.
I. AUTHORIZATION TO SURPLUS CITY VEHICLE TOTALED IN ACCIDENT.
J. APPROVAL OF THE 5 YEAR UPDATE OF THE NORTH KING AND SOUTH
SNOHOMISH COUNTIES REGIONAL MITIGATION PLAN.
K. AUTHORIZATION OF RESOLUTION NO. 1210 TO SUBMIT GRANT APPLICATION
FOR 2010 SNOHOMISH COUNTY CDBG PUBLIC FACILITIES & INFRASTRUCTURE
PROJECTS FUNDING FOR SENIOR CENTER PARKING LOT REHABILITATION.
L. ORDINANCE NO. 3758 - AMENDING ECC 8.51.030 AND ECC 8.51.040 RELATING TO
EMPLOYEE PARKING PERMIT CHANGES.
3. PROCLAMATION IN HONOR OF ARTS & HUMANITIES MONTH, OCTOBER 2009
Mayor Haakenson read a Proclamation in honor of Arts and Humanities Month, October 2009. He
presented the Proclamation to Arts Commission Chair Greg Banasek who thanked the Council for
recognizing the arts as an integral part of the community and the economy. On behalf of the Arts
Commission, he thanked the community members who participate in their programs as well as the Art
Commission’s partners in those events. He commented on the very successful Summer Concert Series
and record attendance at the Write on the Sound Writers Conference.
4. PROCLAMATION IN HONOR OF FRIENDS OF THE EDMONDS LIBRARY WEEK, OCTOBER
18 - 24, 2009.
Mayor Haakenson read a Proclamation in honor of Friends of the Edmonds Library Week, October 18 -
24, 2009. He presented the Proclamation to Friends of the Edmonds Library Board President Page Gorud.
Ms. Gorud relayed the thanks of the approximately 200 members of the Friends of the Edmonds Library.
She explained the Friends provide programs for the library as well as this year they provided furniture for
the library, provided a scholarship to the University of Washington Information School, and sent one
library staff member to continuing education at the Washington Association of Library Employees
(WALE) Conference. Funds for these activities are generated by the ongoing book sale at the library and
the annual book sale which will take place Saturday, October 24 at the Frances Anderson Center.
5. PUBLIC HEARING ON THE FIRE DISTRICT 1 CONTRACT. THE CITY COUNCIL WILL
CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING SCENARIOS AND WILL SELECT A PREFERENCE:
(1) WITHOUT FIRE DISTRICT 1 CONTRACT
(2) WITH FIRE DISTRICT 1 CONTRACT
(3) WITH FIRE DISTRICT 1 CONTRACT (REVENUE REMOVED)
(4) WITH FIRE DISTRICT 1 CONTRACT (SELL APPARATUS; KEEP STATIONS, LAND, AND
TRANSPORT FEES)
(5) WITH FIRE DISTRICT 1 CONTRACT (SELL APPARATUS-REVENUE REMOVED; KEEP
STATIONS, LAND, TRANSPORT FEES)
(6) WITH FIRE DISTRICT 1 CONTRACT (KEEP STATIONS, LAND, APPARATUS, AND
TRANSPORT FEES)
Packet Page 5 of 225
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
October 20, 2009
Page 3
Mayor Haakenson apologized the scenarios were not available on Wednesday on the City’s website as
promised but were made available via the Council packet on Friday.
Councilmember Wambolt referred to a question he sent to Finance Director Lorenzo Hines regarding the
revision made to expenses and asked Mr. Hines to explain the change. Mr. Hines advised an additional
$246,000 was added to the original expenses in Option 1. The change was the result of “re-staking” the
Fire District 1 proposal back to the 2010 budget. The 2010 budget for the Fire Department is $7.972
million. Because the modeling spreadsheet is continually updated for CPI, bargaining agreements, etc.,
he removed all the adjustments in the modeling software for the Fire Department to return to the original
budget of $7.972 million. This provides an objective basis from which to measure the savings. He
summarized if the 2010 budget is modified as a result of the contract, staff would start with that number.
Councilmember Wambolt commented the original budget contained 4.5% for wages but the model
reduced it to 2%; that 2.5% reduction was virtually all the change. Mr. Hines agreed, emphasizing that
was a fluctuating estimate. When the current forecast is updated, he would consider whether that amount
was viable and whether it needed to be raised or lowered. The choice was whether to measure the savings
from a fluctuating estimate or a stable base of the original budget.
Councilmember Orvis referred to the comparison of Option 1 versus Option 4, which shows the Fire
Department budget of $7.9 million, fire contract $6.2 million and 2010 savings of $983,000. One of the
differences was the revenue difference because of the loss of the Woodway and Esperance contract which
brings the cost to $6.8 million. He asked the reason for the difference. Mr. Hines answered the
difference was retaining transport fees of $700,000/year. Councilmember Orvis pointed out transport fees
were retained in both Option 1 and 4. Mr. Hines explained this was a comparison of the General Fund
subsidy in the current budget with the General Fund subsidy with Option 4. The General Fund subsidy in
Option 4 is $983,000 lower than the current situation. The reason it was $983,000 lower was the loss of
some overhead costs and transport fees.
Councilmember Orvis asked what was included in the $6.2 million. Mr. Hines answered that was the
contract amount proposed by Fire District 1 and is based on their estimate of labor costs for 2010. Fire
Chief Tomberg explained the $6.2 million was the labor cost to staff stations, plus the overheads, the Fire
Marshal and the Fire Inspector, and vehicle replacement. He advised this was detailed in Exhibit C of the
original August 24 binder.
Council President Wilson referred to Mr. Hines’ response this afternoon to Councilmember Wambolt’s
email, observing the previous numbers included the year-to-date actuals and impacted the 2010 outlook
based on those actuals and the new numbers did not include any actuals and relied solely on budget
numbers. Mr. Hines responded the old numbers factored in estimates, CPI changes, etc. He reversed out
those changes to put the Fire budget back to its original state in January to allow measurement of the
savings from the original budget in January. In that manner, the 2010 and 2009 budgets are stated using
the same budget methodology and rationale and the savings are measured from the budget.
Council President Wilson commented these are the budget numbers as of January 2009 and not the actual
numbers as of October 20, 2009. He recalled when the budget was developed in August 2008, the
outlook changed based on the collapse in September but the final budget was developed in October and
approved in November. Mayor Haakenson noted the 4.5% was already factored into the 2009 and 2010
budget. Council President Wilson clarified if the numbers are the January 1, 2009 numbers, those
numbers are from a process that began in August 2008 and finalized in October. He reiterated they were
not the most recent known numbers. Mr. Hines referred to the 2008 actual column in the current forecast,
the actuals as of the end of January 2009, pointing out the spreadsheet was the outlook/forecast but had
Packet Page 6 of 225
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
October 20, 2009
Page 4
been modified to reflect the Fire Department’s original budget to allow an easier comparison of the
impact of the proposal on the Fire budget. His intent was to isolate the Fire budget.
Council President Wilson commented the challenge with looking at the budget was recognizing that the
budget was very conservative and the budgeted savings could be very different than the actual savings.
For example, the EMS transport fees, the budget was $700,000 and he believed the actual amount would
far exceed that. He asked whether Mr. Hines had addressed his questions regarding transport fees. Mr.
Hines answered he had not. He recalled Council President Wilson anticipated revenue from transport fees
would exceed $700,000 in 2009. He explained the City has received $440,000 in transport fees through
the end of September 2009 and he anticipated the $700,000 amount would be achieved for 2009.
Mayor Haakenson asked whether transport fees was projected to increase in future years. Mr. Hines
answered it was projected to increase by 2.5-3% per year. Council President Wilson answered that
amount was appropriate for budgeting but he was certain the revenue would exceed $700,000 next year
because the year-to-date transport fees for 2009 were short at least 1 month and possibly as much as 3.
Council President Wilson expressed concern with the Council selecting a preferred alternative tonight
when staff had not had enough time to answer the questions he raised two weeks ago. Mr. Hines
responded the questions Council President Wilson’s raised in his PowerPoint had been answered. He
suggested Council President Wilson and he meet to determine which questions had not been met. Mayor
Haakenson acknowledged transport fees would increase in the future. A modest increase of 2.5-3% was
budgeted; he viewed anything more than that as imprudent budgeting.
Council President Wilson commented the Council had not had enough time or information to make a
decision tonight on a preferred alternative. There were fundamental budgeting differences between the
actuals. For example, the City did not receive any transport fees in January, 1/12th of the year or 8%. A
2.5% increase was not the same as an 8% increase. Mayor Haakenson responded staff had prepared the
budget and was standing by those numbers. The Council could add 10% or $70,000 to that revenue
stream if they wished. \
Councilmember Bernheim recalled Chief Tomberg mentioned he wanted to move his office from the third
floor of City Hall to be closer to his men. He asked where Chief Tomberg’s office would be located
under the Fire District 1 contract. Chief Tomberg answered if the Council approved the Fire District 1
contract, he would be assigned to the Fire District 1 Administration building southeast of Mariner High
School and adjacent to the training tower. Fire Station 11, the largest station Fire District 1 operates with
the most personnel, is kitty-corner from the site. Councilmember Bernheim asked how much closer that
office would be to the Fire Department than his current office. Chief Tomberg answered it was
approximately the same or slightly further but it was a much larger station.
Councilmember Bernheim asked whether there were plans under the Fire District 1 contract to abandon
the costly training exercises at the North Bend facility and utilize the new Fire District 1 training facility
instead. Chief Tomberg answered the only training that was done at North Bend that could not be done
locally was live fire exercises where a building similar to the training tower is fire loaded and set on fire
under strictly controlled conditions. Every Fire Department on the west side goes to North Bend for that
training. Councilmember Bernheim asked whether that training could be conducted at the new Fire
District 1 training facility. Chief Tomberg answered it was unlikely the Air Pollution Control District
would allow that type of burning at the site. The Fire District 1 training facility does have a smoke room
in which non-toxic smoke and conditions similar to an interior structure fire can be simulated. Exercises
with actual flames, heat, etc. are conducted at North Bend. Councilmember Bernheim concluded even
Fire District 1 went to North Bend for that training. Chief Tomberg agreed.
Packet Page 7 of 225
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
October 20, 2009
Page 5
Councilmember Bernheim asked whether the Edmonds Fire Department planned to use the Fire District 1
facility for training if the contract were not approved. Chief Tomberg answered there would be
opportunities to use it on Fire District 1’s schedule.
Councilmember Bernheim commented levels of service for Edmonds residents under the contract would
not change. Chief Tomberg answered the response time aspect of level of service would not change much
because the fire stations would be in the same locations, staffed by the same personnel and at the current
levels. The level of service of all the other services offered by Fire District 1 would increase via the
contract such as enhanced career development opportunities for firefighters, improved training, a
dedicated Public Education person, a dedicated Public Information person, three Medical Service
Officers, a dedicated Safety Officer, as well as other programs that Edmonds could not provide.
Councilmember Orvis commented because both Options 1 and 4 included transport fees, the projected
revenue from transport fees did not affect the savings.
Councilmember Wambolt commented the discussion regarding transport fees was only relevant in the
option where the City sold the land and the transport fees were collected by Fire District 1; in the options
where the City retained the land and the transfer station, the savings would be greater if the transport fees
exceeded the projected $700,000.
Mayor Haakenson opened the public participation portion of the public hearing
Lora Petso, Edmonds, commented she did not receive the information until today and wanted additional
time for review. If the Council chose to select an option tonight, she recommended selecting an option
that retained the transport fees and did not require spending down the ending cash balance. However, if
that were done, the contract with Fire District 1 no longer solves the City’s budget issues and the Council
was likely to approve placing a levy on the ballot. She suggested allowing the public to vote in February
whether to contract with Fire District 1 for fire service at the same time as the levy.
Al Rutledge, Edmonds, commented the taxpayers had invested a great deal in the fire station, apparatus
and equipment. He agreed with the suggestion to allow the citizens to vote whether to contract with Fire
District 1.
Diane Buckshnis, Edmonds, thanked firefighters Doug Dahl and Tim Hoover for spending time with Dr.
Senderoff and her to review the contract, the RFA concept, and the history of the contract offer.
Information provided at last week’s meeting was also very helpful. She recommended slowing down the
process and taking another 2-4 weeks to discuss the issue because many citizens were still confused.
Hearing no further comment, Mayor Haakenson closed the public hearing.
Councilmember Wambolt summarized the options:
1. Without Fire District 1 Contract - business as usual, expenses exceed revenue in 2010; General
Fund ending cash balance goes negative in 2011.
2. With Fire District 1 Contract - sell all the Fire Department assets to Fire District 1, place the
proceeds in the General Fund to operate the City, lose transport fees of $700,000+/year, expenses
exceed revenue in 2013, General Fund ending cash balance goes negative in 2015
3. With Fire District 1 Contract (revenue removed) - sell all the Fire Department assets to Fire
District 1, place the proceeds outside the General Fund, lose transport fees of $700,000+/year,
expenses exceed revenue in 2011, General Fund ending cash balance goes negative in 2012
4. With Fire District 1 Contract (sell apparatus; keep stations, land, and transport fees) - sell all the
depreciating assets and retain all the appreciating assets. Place the proceeds in the General Fund
Packet Page 8 of 225
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
October 20, 2009
Page 6
to operate the City, retain transport fees, expenses exceed revenue in 2011, General Fund goes
negative in 2013.
5. With Fire District 1 Contract (sell apparatus-revenue removed; keep stations, land, transport fees)
- sell all the depreciating assets and retain all the appreciating assets, place the proceeds outside
the General Fund, retain transport fees, expenses exceed revenue in 2011, General Fund goes
negative in 2012.
6. With Fire District 1 Contract (keep stations, land, apparatus, and transport fees) - expenses
exceed revenue in 2011 and General Fund ending cash balance goes negative in 2012.
Councilmember Wambolt commented regardless of the option the Council chose, the City would still
need to take a levy lid lift to the voters next year. This was not a permanent fix. He did not agree with
taking the issue of whether to contract with Fire District 1 to the voters, remarking it would be a
monumental achievement if everyone in the Council Chambers understood the issue; getting 26,000
voters to understand would be impossible. This was a decision for the Council to make.
Council President Wilson commented although he could see how he was going to vote eventually, he did
not want to be pushed into it. The service level increases were not enough to justify contracting. For
example there would be no change in response times and no change/increase in emergency services.
There would be public information benefits and it would be easier to calendar training at a training tower
the Fire Department already has access to. The question of finances was the primary issue and the
Council was still working on that.
Council President Wilson pointed out the Council had not been provided any numbers with regard to the
passage of I-1033, which polls currently estimate has a 61% approval rate. He anticipated if the City had
to fix its General Fund to inflation, at the end of the first five years of the contract, the City would have a
$7 million budget deficit. If the Council did not approve contracting for fire service with Fire District 1,
at the end of five years, the City would still have a $7 million deficit. This did not solve the City’s
financial problems. The issue of ensuring that fire services were secure had not been addressed. Council
President Wilson summarized the information provided did not address I-1033, which the voters would
decide on in two weeks, nor did it address how to ensure the stability of fire services into the future. He
was unable to vote on a preference until the numbers were provided because the question was not about
service, it was about finances.
COUNCILMEMBER BERNHEIM MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT WILSON,
TO CONTINUE FURTHER DISCUSSION UNTIL NOVEMBER 24, 2009 WHEN FINAL
NUMBERS WOULD BE AVAILABLE.
Councilmember Bernheim agreed this was not a permanent fix. It was a sale of Fire Department assets in
order to generate income to cover a short term gap of 3-4 years. He used the analogy of selling one’s
home and using the equity to pay rent, concluding that was a short term recipe for disaster. He
anticipated the City would get rid of its Fire Department and in 10-12 years when contract rates had
increased substantially, citizens would question why the Council sold the Fire Department. He did not
view this as an urgent issue, recalling a very successful plan was developed to place a levy on the ballot.
He recalled the levy included funds for the Fire Department. If money was an issue, he suggested placing
the levy on the ballot rather than selling the City’s assets to generate short term capital.
Councilmember Bernheim commented the current fire service was outstanding and questioned why
anyone wanted to tinker with it. He objected to the rush to approve the contract by the end of the year,
noting the only thing that would achieve was end of the year advantages for employees. He pointed out it
was clear the union wanted new management. He referred to the frustration voiced by the firefighters
with funding issues in every budget which led to their desire to get out of the current system and under
new management. He reminded the firefighters had contracts and if there were give-backs, it was due to
the panic in the economy and the alternative of layoffs.
Packet Page 9 of 225
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
October 20, 2009
Page 7
Councilmember Bernheim summarized the reason he was recommending postponing further discussion
was because it was not an urgent financial problem, the Council should be focusing on the levy rather
than selling off its assets, the union clearly wants new management, and he wanted time to see the real
numbers. He suggested there were alternatives such as working out the management problems.
Mayor Haakenson referred to Councilmember Bernheim’s comment that Mr. Hoover had described
management problems last week rather than revenue problems and the City’s inability to fund the Fire
Department each year. He asked Mr. Hoover if he had mentioned management problems.
Tim Hoover, President, Edmonds Firefighters Local 1828, responded he did not talk about
management problems; he talked about the annual fight for funding to maintain levels of service.
Councilmember Plunkett suggested narrowing the options to a preferred option which would allow the
public to learn more about and speak to that option. He did not support a motion to set a date to continue
discussion, noting the selection of a preferred option would lead the Council to that.
Councilmember Orvis agreed with selecting a preferred option, pointing out staff did not need to continue
generating numbers for selling the land if none of the Councilmembers supported that option. Similarly,
the projection for transport fees was not relevant unless the Council was interested in selling the stations.
He was in favor of retaining the land and the stations. He commented Option 1 was always under
consideration and recommended moving forward with discussion on Option 4 which saves the City a
significant amount of money operationally. If the Council narrowed the Options to 1 and 4, it was not a
final decision but would focus the discussion. He suggested having the contract rewritten to reflect
Option 4 and to hold another public hearing on the scenario of Option 1 versus 4 at the next meeting.
Councilmember Wambolt agreed with the suggestion to narrow the options. He asked Councilmember
Bernheim what new numbers he was waiting for. Councilmember Bernheim responded his understanding
was the numbers were not final, referring to an email sent late this afternoon. Mr. Hines explained the
email was simply an explanation of why some of the numbers changed; the numbers provided to the
Council were final.
Councilmember Wambolt commented the fire service contract would not be a solution to I-1033. The
solution to I-1033 would be a levy. Council President Wilson responded the question of what the City
would do if I-1033 passed and how it affected this decision needed to be addressed. There were other
solutions to consider such as creating an independent Woodway-Edmonds Fire District or reverse annex
into Fire District 1 rather than contract for fire service with Fire District 1. Mayor Haakenson pointed out
if I-1033 passed, the City would be in a better position with a contract with Fire District 1 than its own
Fire Department in an amount of approximately $2 million/year. The deficit in 2011 without the contract
is $635,000; with the contract it is $2.3 million. He summarized the City would have issues with I-1033
regardless.
Councilmember Wambolt clarified Council President Wilson’s point was the City would be worse off
with I-1033 and a contract with Fire District 1 because the City would be stuck with a contract payment.
Council President Wilson agreed, noting the City would be unable to terminate the contract for five years.
He recommended waiting until the outcome of I-1033 was known before entering into a contract that
would tie the City’s hands for five years. Mayor Haakenson stated he would prefer a contract for $6.2
million for five years rather than a $9 million Fire Department. Council President Wilson clarified there
were many figures in the $9 million that were not direct financial savings such as non-departmental costs.
Councilmember Wambolt commented his analysis showed the $6.2 million was definitely less than the
City could provide fire service for and less than the Fire Department payroll. Even if the City’s finances
Packet Page 10 of 225
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
October 20, 2009
Page 8
were in tremendous shape, the City should be evaluating this because it made the Fire Department more
efficient.
UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION FAILED (1-6), COUNCILMEMBER BERNHEIM VOTING IN
FAVOR; AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT WILSON AND COUNCILMEMBERS ORVIS,
PLUNKETT, OLSON, PETERSON AND WAMBOLT OPPOSED.
COUNCILMEMBER ORVIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PETERSON, TO
DRAFT AN AGREEMENT FOR OPTION 4 AND PLACE IT FOR PUBLIC HEARING WITH
COMPARISON FROM OPTION 4 (WITH FIRE DISTRICT 1 CONTRACT - SELL APPARATUS;
KEEP STATIONS, LAND, AND TRANSPORT FEES) TO OPTION 1 FOR THE NEXT
MEETING. COUNCILMEMBER PETERSON SECONDED THE MOTION.
If the Council planned to pursue a contract with Fire District 1, Councilmember Orvis recommended it be
via Option 4.
Councilmember Peterson supported narrowing the options which would give staff and the public an
opportunity to focus on one option. If this wasn’t the preferred option at the end of the discussion,
Council could focus on a different option.
Councilmember Wambolt asked if the intent was to have the contract rewritten to reflect Option 4.
Councilmember Orvis answered yes. Mayor Haakenson explained the contract for service did not change
with any of the options. The Interlocal Agreement would change if the stations and land were not part of
the sale.
Council President Wilson clarified the motion was to schedule this on next week’s agenda. He asked
Mayor Haakenson if the updated information would be available for public review by Friday. Mayor
Haakenson stated all the information would be available on the City’s website by the end of the week.
Council President Wilson asked whether that was enough time for the public to review and comment and
for the Council to make a decision next week or if Councilmember Orvis envisioned additional public
hearings. Councilmember Orvis responded he was uncertain whether he would be ready to make a
decision next week but anticipated he could by the November 2 meeting.
Mayor Haakenson restated the motion as follows:
TO SCHEDULE A PUBLIC HEARING FOR OCTOBER 27 ON OPTION 4 (WITH FIRE
DISTRICT 1 CONTRACT - SELL APPARATUS; KEEP STATIONS, LAND, AND TRANSPORT
FEES).
UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION CARRIED (5-2), COUNCILMEMBERS PETERSON, PLUNKETT,
WAMBOLT, ORVIS AND OLSON IN FAVOR; AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT WILSON AND
COUNCILMEMBER BERNHEIM OPPOSED.
(Council President Wilson left the meeting at 8:18 p.m.)
6. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING AN UPDATE OF THE 2002
TRANSPORTATION PLAN. THE AMENDMENTS IN THE PROPOSED 2009
TRANSPORTATION PLAN WOULD:
(1) USE A FUTURE PLANNING YEAR OF 2025 INSTEAD OF 2022.
(2) BASE CONCURRENCY ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ON UPDATED CITYWIDE
TRAVEL DEMAND FORECASTING MODEL AND UPDATED LEVEL OF SERVICE
STANDARDS.
(3) INCORPORATE RESULTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF SAFETY STUDIES THAT HAVE
BEEN COMPLETED BETWEEN 2002 AND 2009.
Packet Page 11 of 225
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
October 20, 2009
Page 9
(4) GIVE STRONGER EMPHASIS TO NON-MOTORIZED TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS.
PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE PROJECTS MAKE UP APPROXIMATELY 25% OF PLAN
COSTS INSTEAD OF APPROXIMATELY 5% IN THE 2002 PLAN.
(5) UTILIZE PLANNING-LEVEL COST PROJECTIONS BASED ON HIGHER PER UNIT PRICES
TO REFLECT TRENDS.
(6) ADJUST REFERENCES TO THE EDMONDS CROSSING MULTI-MODAL PLAN. NO CITY
EXPENDITURES ARE PROPOSED BUT THE ITEM IS RETAINED AS A LONG-TERM
PROJECT.
(7) UPDATE THE TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE, INCREASING THE FEE FROM $764 PER TRIP TO
$1,040 PER TRIP.
(8) ADD A TRAFFIC CALMING PROGRAM AND ADA RAMP TRANSITION PLAN AS
ADDITIONAL PROGRAMS.
(9) CORRECTION OF THE RECOMMENDED FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF OLYMPIC
AVENUE AND ADDITION OF AN ALTERNATIVE ‘NON-SIGNAL’ IMPROVEMENT FOR
THE INTERSECTIONS OF MAIN @ 9TH AND WALNUT @ 9TH.
(10) UPDATE POLICIES SECTION
Transportation Engineer Bertrand Hauss explained during the September 22 public hearing, speeding
concerns along Olympic Avenue were addressed. There was also discussion regarding radar feedback
signs as an option to help reduce speeds. Council requested staff obtain information on those signs with
regard to their effectiveness, cost, and revenue sources.
The speed limit along Olympic Avenue between Main Street and Puget Drive is 25 mph. Several speed
studies were conducted in 2005 with following results:
85th percentile speed for northbound movement: 35.2 mph
85th percentile speed for southbound movement: 34.7 mph
The 85th percentile represents the speed at which 85% of the vehicles travel at or below the speed limit.
In the Traffic Calming Program (Appendix B in 2009 Transportation Plan), a stretch of roadway will be
evaluated when the 85th percentile speed is at least 8 mph above the speed limit.
He explained radar feedback signs detect the speed of passing vehicles, flashes speeds on a reader board
when vehicles exceed the speed limit, and are used as an alternative solution to physical traffic calming
devices in the roadway. Drawbacks to physical traffic calming devices in the roadway include delay for
emergency vehicles, traffic noise and they are hazardous for bicycles.
With regard to the effectiveness of radar feedback signs, he explained staff was unable to do a before/after
study of the signs on 220th because one of the signs is out of service. Staff’s research of other
jurisdictions found Bellevue has 31 radar feedback signs. Bellevue’s study found the signs resulted in an
average speed reduction of 1-5 mph. Kirkland has 6 radar feedback signs and their study also found an
average speed reduction of 1-5 mph. He concluded the radar feedback signs were effective in reducing
speeds.
The cost of the signs per unit is approximately $14,500 (from bids obtained for the Puget Drive Walkway
project in 2009). The cost to place signs in both directions on Olympic Avenue would total $29,000. The
available funding source is Fund 112. Future funding sources include Fund 125 (REET-2
Transportation), increased vehicle license fee via the Transportation Benefit District (still needs voter
approval), and the sign could be included in the grant application for the Olympic Avenue Walkway
project.
Mayor Haakenson clarified voter approval would be required for a $100 vehicle license fee. If the
Council approved the Transportation Plan, they were only approving asking the voters to approve a higher
vehicle license fee to fund transportation projects.
Packet Page 12 of 225
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
October 20, 2009
Page 10
Mr. Hauss provided a map identifying the proposed locations of the signs, northbound at 612 Olympic
Avenue and southbound at 747 Olympic Avenue.
Councilmember Wambolt questioned the cost, recalling the signs on 220th were $7000-$8000 each. Mr.
Hauss responded that was the latest estimate provided for the Puget Drive Walkway project.
Councilmember Wambolt asked how the speed reductions of 1-5 mph were measured. Mr. Hauss
answered a speed study conducted prior to installation was compared with a speed study conducted a few
months after installation and again 6-12 months after installation.
Councilmember Wambolt pointed out the signs display drivers’ speed regardless of whether they were
exceeding the speed limit. Mr. Hauss advised the signs were adjustable to display a vehicle’s speed only
when it was traveling over the speed limit.
Councilmember Peterson asked if there were funds available in Fund 112. Mr. Hauss answered there
were. Councilmember Peterson asked whether grant applications for future projects were contingent on
Olympic Avenue being upgraded to a collector. Mr. Hauss answered if staff applied for a grant for the
sidewalk project and Olympic Avenue was a local street, the probability of obtaining the grant was
significantly lower than if the street were characterized as a collector street.
Councilmember Peterson asked whether installation of the signs would reduce speeds and traffic volumes
enough to retain its classification as a local street. Mr. Hauss did not anticipate the volumes would
change significantly. Jennifer Barnes, ICF Jones and Stokes, responded there was a chance that
volumes could be reduced slightly if drivers felt it was a less fast route but most of the criteria for a
collector street would be met even at lower speeds.
Councilmember Plunkett referred to Item 9 in the agenda title (Correction of the Recommended
Functional Classification of Olympic Avenue), and asked if staff’s recommendation was to reclassify
Olympic Avenue as a collector street. Mr. Hauss answered it was.
Mayor Haakenson opened the public participation portion of the public hearing
Bill McCormick, Edmonds, resident on Olympic Avenue, explained ever since Olympic Avenue was
improved, the residents’ concern has been speed. He anticipated that changing the classification from
local to collector would result in widening of the street and the sidewalk which would encourage
speeding. He was also concerned with the eight narrow, substandard streets that intersect with Olympic
Avenue, one that is 18 feet wide that serves 10 homes, as well as 5 unnamed lanes that serve 5+ homes
that are as narrow as 10 feet. He disagreed that Olympic Avenue provided access to Yost Park, noting the
only access to Yost Park from Olympic Avenue was a steep, unpaved path.
Don Hall, Edmonds, submitted a petition with 50 signatures to City Clerk Sandy Chase. He explained
they had not encountered anyone who favored reclassifying Olympic Avenue to a collector. He was in
favor of the radar feedback signs, noting the temporary radar signs on Olympic Avenue have been
effective at reducing speeds. He urged the Council to remove Olympic Avenue as a collector in the
Transportation Plan.
Lora Petso, Edmonds, reiterated her belief that when levels of service were reduced, the notice of public
hearing must state levels of service have been reduced. The level of service has been lowered for several
intersections along Hwy. 99 and the level of service standard has been eliminated for local streets.
Al Rutledge, Edmonds, expressed concern with the proposed $100 vehicle license fee.
Packet Page 13 of 225
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
October 20, 2009
Page 11
Roger Hertrich, Edmonds, suggested the statement in the Plan that Olympic Avenue provides a direct
connection between Edmonds Elementary and Yost Park was misleading and should be removed. He
noted most of the changes were based on the installation of a walkway to replace the existing walkway
which required the classification of Olympic Avenue to be changed to a collector. The matrix indicates
walkways will be installed on several roadways, of those Olympic Avenue is the only one with an
existing walkway. He questioned the expenditure of $1 million to replace 6,000 feet of an existing
walkway with a 5-foot wide sidewalk and curb and recommended installing sidewalks other places in the
City where there were no sidewalks. He also recommended retaining the local street designation of
Olympic Avenue, remarking it was only a device to get money.
Hearing no further comment, Mayor Haakenson closed the public hearing.
Councilmember Wambolt agreed with Mr. Hertrich’s comment that it appeared the change in the
designation of Olympic Avenue was necessary to enhance the probability of obtaining grants. He also
agreed with his comment about spending money to widen a sidewalk on a street that already has a
sidewalk when there were many streets in the City without sidewalks. He agreed with the comment that
Olympic Avenue was not a direct connection to Yost Park. Mr. Hauss responded all the walkway
projects in the Walkway Plan were identified by the Walkway Committee who evaluated many different
walkways with regard to several criteria including safety and speeding. The sidewalk on Olympic
Avenue was identified because it currently has a rolled curb and due to the high speeds, particularly
northbound.
In regard to upgrading Olympic Avenue to obtain grant funds, Mr. Hauss explained during the last public
hearing, staff submitted a report that contained detailed reasons for the upgrade including that it already
serves as a collector based on the average daily traffic, high non-motorized usage, street length, street
spacing and street connectivity. In 2004 there were 1,920 vehicle trips/day; the typical range for a
collector street is 1,000 and 5,000. He summarized there were numerous reasons for the upgrade, not
only to enhance the probability of obtaining grant funds. Councilmember Wambolt commented there was
more that could be done to slow traffic, pointing out speeding occurred throughout the City because there
were not enough resources to control it.
In order to make a record regarding Ms. Petso’s comment, City Attorney Scott Snyder explained the
advertisement that appeared in the newspaper states as Item 2 of this agenda item, Base Concurrency
Analysis and Recommendation on Updated Citywide Travel Demand Forecasting Model and Updated
Level of Service Standards. He asked the consultant to explain why that was an accurate description of
what occurred. Ms. Barnes responded there was an update to several components of the level of service
standards, some higher, some lower. For SR 524, the City received direction from WSDOT to hold the
standard to the classification of Highway of Regional Significance, LOS E. Historically the level of
service standard on that roadway was D; as part of this update there was a drop in the level of service
standard from D to E to comply with WSDOT’s direction.
Ms. Barnes explained SR 99 was not held to any standard in the previous Plan. Consistent with
WSDOT’s direction, a LOS E was also applied to SR 99 because the portion north of SR 104 is also a
Highway of Regional Significance. With regard to local streets, the policy contains a LOS B for local
access streets; however, none of the City’s concurrency intersections are local streets, thus the LOS B has
never been applied. The Traffic Calming Program proposed as part of the update was a more appropriate
way to address traffic volumes and speeds. The result of applying concurrency standards would be a
recommendation to increase capacity such as widening the roadway to accommodate increased traffic
volumes.
Councilmember Orvis recalled he voted against the Transportation Plan in 2002 due to the upgrade of
local streets to arterials. He explained homeowners may have purchased their home on a street where
Packet Page 14 of 225
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
October 20, 2009
Page 12
their children could safely play in the front yard; over time the street became what is effectively an
arterial and now their grandchildren cannot safely play in the yard. If he were that homeowner, he would
not want the street reclassified so that funds for sidewalks could be obtained, he would want it addressed
via traffic calming, even paying more taxes via a vehicle license fee. He voiced his objection to any
reclassifications.
COUNCILMEMBER PETERSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BERNHEIM,
TO APPROVE THE 2009 COMPREHENSIVE TRANSPORTATION PLAN AND BEGIN AN
INVESTIGATION IN 2010 FOR ADDITIONAL REVENUE FROM THE TRANSPORTATION
BENEFIT DISTRICT.
Councilmember Plunkett commented Olympic Avenue was a long, wide street that encouraged speeding.
He was concerned that changing the classification of Olympic Avenue would allow future staffs to widen
the roadway, increase the speed limit or add another lane.
COUNCILMEMBER PLUNKETT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER WAMBOLT,
TO AMEND THE PLAN TO CHANGE OLYMPIC AVENUE FROM THE RECOMMENDED
COLLECTOR BACK TO A LOCAL STREET. AMENDMENT CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
(Council President Wilson was not present for the vote.)
Councilmember Orvis suggested changing the classification of all the proposed arterial upgrades to their
existing classification. He advised a list of the proposed upgrades was contained on page 3-8. Mayor
Haakenson pointed out that change would affect grant funding.
Councilmember Plunkett asked if there had been any public testimony regarding the other street upgrades.
Councilmember Orvis questioned whether there would have been if the residents on those streets had
been alerted. Mayor Haakenson pointed out this was the third public hearing on the Transportation Plan.
COUNCILMEMBER ORVIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER WAMBOLT, THAT
ALL THE RECOMMENDED HIGHER CLASSIFICATIONS BE CHANGED BACK TO THEIR
CURRENT CLASSIFICATION.
Councilmember Bernheim commented the Council had not heard the same concerns from residents on the
other streets. He pointed out this Plan could be amended in the future if necessary.
Councilmember Plunkett commented the Council was not aware of how the residents on those streets felt
about the change; some may be in favor of it.
Councilmember Peterson clarified there was no plan to increase the speed limit on any of the streets
where the classification would be changed from local to collector. Mr. Hauss agreed. Mayor Haakenson
advised Council approval was required to increase a speed limit. He did not recall any change in a speed
limits in the years he had served on the Council or as Mayor.
Councilmember Wambolt emphasized changing the classification did not change how the street was used.
For example, the Plan proposes changing Dayton Street between 5th Avenue and 9th Avenue from a local
street to a collector. A resident in that area, his observation was that section was a racetrack.
THE VOTE ON THE AMENDMENT FAILED (1-5), COUNCILMEMBER ORVIS VOTING YES.
(Council President Wilson was not present for the vote.)
THE VOTE ON THE MAIN MOTION AS AMENDED CARRIED (5-1), COUNCILMEMBER
ORVIS VOTING NO. (Council President Wilson was not present for the vote.)
Packet Page 15 of 225
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
October 20, 2009
Page 13
7. PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING THE 2008 PARKS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT
OF THE 2001 PARKS PLAN. IN ADDITION TO A WIDE VARIETY OF MINOR CHANGES,
THE 2008 PARKS PLAN WOULD IMPLEMENT THE FOLLOWING CHANGES TO THE 2001
PARKS PLAN:
(1) REPLACE RECOMMENDATION TO DEVELOP A YEAR-ROUND 50-METER INDOOR POOL
WITH AMENITIES AND RETENTION OF YOST POOL AS A SEASONAL OUTDOOR POOL
WITH A FEASIBILITY STUDY TO EXAMINE YOST POOL AND OTHER COMMUNITY
OPTIONS FOR AN AQUATICS FACILITY. THE PROPOSED FEASIBILITY STUDY WOULD
PROVIDE INFORMATION ON WHICH TO BASE A FUTURE COURSE OF ACTION.
(2) “CONNECTIONS” WAS ADDED AS AN UNDERLYING THEME FOR THE PLAN AND A
NEW SECTION FOCUSES ON IMPLEMENTING CONNECTIVITY THROUGHOUT THE
PLAN.
(3) THE 2008 PLAN CONTAINS AN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY NOT CONTAINED IN THE 2001
PLAN. THE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CONTAINS NEW LANGUAGE STRESSING THE
BENEFITS AND IMPORTANCE OF THE PARKS, RECREATION AND CULTURAL
RESOURCES AND ASSETS TO THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, PHYSICAL HEALTH
AND OVERALL QUALITY OF LIFE OF THE CITY.
(4) THE PLAN AND EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INCLUDE POTENTIAL ACQUISITION AND
DEVELOPMENT OF PROPERTIES FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES IN THE DOWNTOWN
WATERFRONT ACTIVITY CENTER IN BOTH THE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND AT
OTHER PLACES WITHIN THE PLAN.
(5) THE 2008 PLAN REMOVES CULTURAL SERVICES TO A SEPARATE ELEMENT IN ORDER
TO RECOGNIZE AND BUILD ON EDMONDS’ IDENTITY AS A CULTURAL DESTINATION.
CROSS REFERENCES TO THE COMMUNITY CULTURAL PLAN AND STREETSCAPE
PLAN ARE INCLUDED.
(6) IN ORDER TO RECOGNIZE THE LACK OF LARGE TRACTS OF LAND AND THE EXPENSE
OF ACQUIRING NEW LAND WITHIN THE CITY AS IT APPROACHES “BUILD OUT,” THE
2008 PLAN PLACES A STRONGER EMPHASIS ON IMPROVING THE UTILITY OF
EXISTING FACILITIES AND WORKING WITH PARTNERS IN OVERLAPPING AND
ADJACENT JURISDICTIONS.
(7) THE 2008 PLAN CHANGES THE METHODOLOGY AND PRESENTATION OF LEVEL OF
SERVICE BY FACILITY TYPE PRESENTED IN THE 2001 PLAN. CHANGES ALSO
ADDRESS CURRENT FINANCIAL CONSTRAINTS AND STATE THE CITY’S LONG-TERM
ASPIRATIONAL GOAL OF REACHING RECOMMENDED NATIONAL STANDARDS.
(8) THE 2008 PLAN REVISES AND UPDATES THE CITY’S PARK LAND INVENTORY TO
REFLECT ACQUISITIONS AND DELETE EXPIRED OR TERMINATED INTERLOCAL
AGREEMENTS.
City Attorney Scott Snyder explained the Growth Management Hearings Board (GMHB) remanded the
City Council’s approval of the 2008 Plan in order to have another public hearing and obtain a
recommendation from the Hearing Examiner regarding an Interlocal Agreement termination. The matter
was remanded to the Council because the prior generic notice did not conform to the GMHB’s
requirements. A more compete notice has been provided as shown on page 1 of the Item 7 packet.
Mr. Snyder explained the Council’s substantive decisions were upheld by the Board. If the Council
wished to make any changes after hearing from the public, the Council was free to do so but was not
obligated to change the prior decision. Final action cannot be taken until a recommendation is provided
from the Hearing Examiner regarding the Hickman Park, former Sherwood Elementary, Interlocal
Agreement ballfield maintenance contract. Final action will need to be taken by early December in order
to report to the GMHB.
Parks & Recreation Director Brian McIntosh explained although the GMHB found the City Council’s
unanimous decision to adopt the Plan valid within the Council’s legislative discretion, the Board
concluded that more effective notice of the amendments under consideration should be given. For that
reason, notice of this hearing was published on October 4. The updated Parks Plan is a general plan with
Packet Page 16 of 225
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
October 20, 2009
Page 14
input from citizens, staff, consultant, Planning Board and Council that was collected, analyzed and
compiled between April 2007 and November 2008. In addition to a variety of minor changes made
between 2001 and the end of the review process in 2008, the Plan implements the eight core changes
identified in the agenda item title. He listed the eight changes contained in the agenda title, commenting
the list was not inclusive of all the revisions but were the changes staff identified as major changes.
For Councilmember Bernheim, Mr. McIntosh advised the study referred to in Item 1 had been completed
since the plan was adopted in November 2008.
Mayor Haakenson opened the public participation portion of the public hearing
Lora Petso, Edmonds, explained she was still concerned about the reduction of level of service in the
Park Plan as well as that it was not properly noticed. There was still no notice of a reduction in level of
service, only a claimed change in methodology and presentation of level of service. She explained there
had been a change; level of service was previously identified via park acreage per 1,000 citizens, that
methodology was still used, however now there was less park acreage per 1,000 citizens. She was
concerned with giving away the Sherwood Park playfields. With regard to effective notice, she pointed
out the GMHB’s footnote contained a specific reference that the Plan generally reduced level of service.
When the Council reconsidered the Plan after the Hearing Examiner’s recommendation, she
recommended the reduction in the level of service be included in the notice. With regard to the Hearing
Examiner meeting, she advised there was a Land Use Sign on the property but it was blank. The GMHB
also required the City to demonstrate consistency with its Comprehensive Plan policy on abandonment of
public facilities. The policy specifically states no park shall be abandoned until the Hearing Examiner has
reviewed and reported to the City Council. She disagreed the Interlocal Agreement was terminated by the
City and referenced the March 20, 2007 Council minutes. Paragraph 1.5 of the contract provides the
agreement may be terminated only upon written agreement of the parties, executed in the same manner as
provided by law for the execution of this agreement. The law requires approval by the legislative body.
The Board found by adopting this Plan, the City is abandoning a park; although she preferred the Council
not abandon a park, if they were, that should be clearly stated.
Al Rutledge, Edmonds, advised the eight changes described by Mr. McIntosh did not include the
Hearing Examiner’s decision regarding the lights at Meadowdale High School. He expressed support for
a pool.
Roger Hertrich, Edmonds, expressed concern with Item 6 (In order to recognize the lack of large tracts
of land and the expense of acquiring new land within the City as it approaches “build out,” the 2008 Plan
places a stronger emphasis on improving the utility of existing facilities and working with partners in
overlapping and adjacent jurisdictions), and questioned whether the park acreage to citizen ratio was less
than the previous ratio. He recommended as the City became denser, there needed to be more park
facilities. He expressed concern that no grant funds were sought for the $500,000 purchase of waterfront
property. He advised the Plan did not identify an area in the mid-waterfront, the “blue dot” as a possible
future park.
Hearing no further comment, Mayor Haakenson closed the public hearing.
Councilmember Bernheim asked about the abandonment of Sherwood Park. He recalled in 2007 the
Council was presented an opportunity to ratify the cancellation of the Interlocal Agreement and the
Council voted unanimously against it. Mr. Snyder clarified the vote was 3-3. He explained the Board
found no evidence in the record to show that the procedure in the Comprehensive Plan had been followed.
They also noted the term “park” was not defined. The former Park Plan included a need for
Neighborhood Parks, an inventory, and an Interlocal Agreement to maintain two playfields on the
Sherwood Elementary site. The City Council over a period of years purchased a 5.5 acre park. The
Packet Page 17 of 225
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
October 20, 2009
Page 15
Interlocal Agreement that obligated the City with Snohomish County to maintain the playfields expired.
The County and School District terminated the Interlocal Agreement to maintain the two playfields,
letting the City off its obligation and the Council chose not to act with regard to that Interlocal
Agreement. The property is no longer owned by the School District, the City met the prior Park Plan’s
declaration of need for a Neighborhood Park. The Park Plan that the Council unanimously approved
deletes the Interlocal Agreement and inserts the 5.5 acre Hickman Park.
Mr. Snyder advised the Plan would be presented to the Council for a final public hearing and ratification
of the prior adoption of the Parks Plan with the Hearing Examiner’s recommendation. The Hearing
Examiner will provide a recommendation regarding whether the termination of the Interlocal Agreement
was consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The new Plan has the new Neighborhood Park but the
record does not indicate the Hearing Examiner provided a recommendation.
Councilmember Bernheim asked why a reduction in the level of service was not announced. Mr. Snyder
answered the notice states the 2008 Plan changes the methodology and presentation of level of service by
facility type. Level of service as used in the Park Plan was not a concurrency level of service and the
Board agreed. This was not a reduction in a level of service that results in a development fee or
requirement.
Councilmember Bernheim agreed park land should be increased as the City’s population increased. He
asked whether adoption of the Plan included an endorsement that parks were less likely to be acquired in
the future. Mr. Snyder responded the Plan identifies needs for facilities and parks by acreage but does not
designate specific parcels for acquisition. The Council retains the discretion to purchase land as it
becomes available. Designating a parcel for park acquisition devalues the property and could force the
City into a takings situation.
Councilmember Wambolt referred to Item 6 mentioned by Mr. Hertrich, noting that language did not state
the City would not purchase more land, it stated there was not a great deal of opportunity to purchase
land. Rather than do nothing, the City would improve existing parks and if land became available the
priority was to purchase land on the waterfront. Mr. McIntosh answered there were no restrictions on the
purchase of property. The “blue dot” Mr. Hertrich referred to was a “starburst” that represents the
Downtown Activity Center.
Mr. Snyder requested the Council advise if there were any changes to be made to the plan. The Plan will
be presented to the Council for a final public hearing and ratification after the Hearing Examiner’s
November 4 hearing and recommendation.
8A. PUBLIC HEARING ON THE PLANNING BOARD RECOMMENDATION TO AMEND
PROVISIONS OF SECTION 17.35.030, KEEPING OF DOMESTICATED ANIMALS IN
RESIDENTIAL ZONES, TO ADD A NEW SUBPARAGRAPH D. RELATING TO FEMALE
DOMESTIC CHICKENS.
Planning Manager Rob Chave explained the Planning Board took testimony and considered input from
the City Attorney as well as the Police Department. The Planning Board concluded it was appropriate to
amend the code to allow keeping of up to three female chickens or hens on properties developed with
single family residential uses. The proposed code amendment would accomplish that recommendation.
Mayor Haakenson opened the public participation portion of the public hearing
Joan Bloom, Edmonds, expressed support for the proposed change. She recalled the origin of the cat
ordinance was a complaint about a cat attacking quail that were kept by a neighbor. She anticipated
residents would house their chickens in a manner that protected them from predators but feared this would
Packet Page 18 of 225
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
October 20, 2009
Page 16
result in a complaint about a cat attacking a chicken. She recommended the Council revisit the cat
ordinance since it was not being enforced.
Hearing no further comment, Mayor Haakenson closed the public hearing.
COUNCILMEMBER BERNHEIM MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PLUNKETT,
TO APPROVE ORDINANCE NO. 3759 – AMENDING THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION
17.35.030 KEEPING OF DOMESTICATED ANIMALS IN RESIDENTIAL ZONES, TO ADD A
NEW SUBPARAGRAPH D. RELATING TO FEMALE DOMESTIC CHICKENS, AND FIXING A
TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE.
Councilmember Wambolt expressed support for the ordinance, advising the only input he received from
citizens was in favor of the ordinance.
Councilmember Orvis expressed support for the ordinance, noting citizens were interested in keeping
chickens and he had not heard any objection.
Councilmember Peterson commented although this was not on the Council’s Sustainability Agenda, it fit
with the goal of making Edmonds a progressive thinking, environmentally aware and green city.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. (Council President Wilson was not present for the vote.)
8B. AUTHORIZE STAFF TO REMOVE FOUR TREES AT THE NORTH CORNER OF 5TH &
DAYTON.
COUNCILMEMBER WAMBOLT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PETERSON,
THAT AS SOON AS POSSIBLE STAFF REMOVE THE FOUR TREES AT THE NORTHWEST
AND NORTHEAST CORNERS OF 5TH & DAYTON.
Councilmember Wambolt explained he was proposing this motion as a result of the damage that occurred
Saturday afternoon when a 20-foot section of tree fell, narrowly missing a car. He noted the tree did not
appear to be rotten and there was only a slight wind at the time this occurred. If those trees broke in a
slight wind, he was concerned with their stability this winter. He concluded he made a mistake by voting
against this action on September 22 and the incident on Saturday resulted in his reconsidering their
removal.
Councilmember Peterson recalled there had been recommendations from staff as well as from outside
consultants regarding these trees. He asked if the City was more liable for ignoring recommendations if
another incident occurred and a person was injured or property damaged. City Attorney Scott Snyder
answered a property owner typically had no liability for damage caused by a tree if they had no reason to
believe it was damaged or diseased. When there was notice, negligence standards applied. With staff’s
recommendations regarding the limited area for roots, it was more likely the City would be held liable for
damage. The City was provided information from WCIA regarding how they would approach liability in
this situation.
Councilmember Peterson asked if the City would be at risk for WCIA refusing a claim because the City
did not heed the advice of experts. Mr. Snyder answered generally the City had a duty to participate
reasonably in its defense. The Council had a great deal of discretion regarding street trees. The City has
a solid claims history and it was unlikely this would trigger the City’s expulsion.
Councilmember Bernheim advised he would vote against the removal on principle. He was opposed to
taking official Council action with inadequate input and sufficient notice. He did not have his materials
and the only facts he had regarding the incident was the email from Councilmember Wambolt. He
Packet Page 19 of 225
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
October 20, 2009
Page 17
referred to Councilmember Wambolt’s comment that the tree did not appear to be diseased, advising tree
branches falling in a windstorm were random acts of God and the City could not remove all the trees to
avoid that happening. He questioned what would be planted as a replacement. The Street Tree Plan calls
for incremental replacement of trees, not wholesale replacement. He was unconvinced that administration
or staff recognized the value to the economy and the community of healthy, vigorous, replacement trees.
Councilmember Bernheim commented the recently planted trees in front of Bank of America at 3rd &
Main were spindly and pathetic looking. He recommended rejecting the principle of pre-emptive
maintenance, identifying trees for removal that might become a problem in the future, advising there were
other methods of enhancing pedestrian safety. He was in favor of taking care of the trees appropriately
and was willing to consider the removal at a future meeting.
Councilmember Wambolt advised the trees in front of Bank of America were on the bank’s property. He
questioned how many times the Council needed to discuss the trees to understand the issues. The Council
was provided information on September 22 and the public provided their input. He recalled the two
arborists said the trees were a species that was susceptible to this type of breakage. With regard to the
size of the trees, he recalled staff had identified a replacement tree. Parks & Recreation Director Brian
McIntosh responded the trees would be replaced with the tree recommended for that intersection, Red
October Glory. He advised staff would obtain the largest caliper tree that would fit in the hole. This
would provide symmetry at the intersection; the other two corners already have Red October Glory trees.
Councilmember Wambolt pointed out the trees planted at the corner near Bank of Washington last year
have grown tremendously.
UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION TIED (3-3), COUNCILMEMBERS WAMBOLT, OLSON AND
PETERSON IN FAVOR; AND COUNCILMEMBERS ORVIS, BERNHEIM AND PLUNKETT
OPPOSED. MAYOR HAAKENSON VOTED YES AND THE MOTION CARRIED. (Council
President Wilson was not present for the vote.)
9. AUDIENCE COMMENTS
Al Rutledge, Edmonds, reported he attended former Councilmember John Nordquist’s service along
with three other former Councilmembers. Mr. Nordquist was a Lake Ballinger area resident for a number
of years. Next, he encouraged the public to attend the Friends of the Edmonds Library Book Sale on
Saturday at the Frances Anderson Center. He referred to the November 4 Hearing Examiner meeting and
questioned whether the same Hearing Examiner could handle this case again.
George Murray, Edmonds, commented Option 1 with regard to the Fire District 1 contract was not
possible as there was an issue with the firefighters themselves that needed to be resolved. His
understanding was Fire District 1 had approached the City; however, in Tim Hoover’s presentation last
week, it was apparent the firefighters want to leave Edmonds for Fire District 1. He recommended
determining what the firefighters needed and what problem drove them to Fire District 1. He preferred
the firefighters be in a neutral position which would allow the Council to make an informed decision. He
questioned exactly what the firefighters’ issues were, recalling Mr. Hoover stated Fire District 1 would
provide stability for 20 years and better service. He questioned how Fire District 1 could operate cheaper
than the Edmonds Fire Department. He recalled the City considered consolidation in 2000 and did not
move forward due to cost. Mukilteo rejected Fire District 1’s offer due to cost. The tax rate charged by
Fire District 1 is $2.17/$1,000 AV; Mukilteo charges $1.75/$1,000 AV. Mayor Haakenson invited Mr.
Murray to meet with him to discuss his concerns.
Roger Hertrich, Edmonds, advised the turtles he complained about last week had been built and painted.
He was awaiting their removal after the first accident. He remarked the interaction with Fire District 1
Packet Page 20 of 225
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
October 20, 2009
Page 18
last week was very mature and interactive. He found Mayor Haakenson’s display last week offensive,
alleging Mayor Haakenson grabbed his jacket. Mayor Haakenson disagreed he had touched Mr. Hertrich,
pointing out he was on the opposite side of the podium. Mr. Hertrich responded Mayor Haakenson was a
liar.
Mayor Haakenson read a response from Transportation Engineer Bertrand Hauss regarding the pedestrian
refuge island Mr. Hertrich addressed. In 2006 a pedestrian and bicycle safety grant was secured for the
Puget Drive Walkway Project. The main purpose of the project was to improve pedestrian safety by
adding sidewalks on one side of the street and pedestrian refuge islands in two uncontrolled crosswalks.
The pedestrian refuge islands were incorporated into the design and their size and placement was
approved by WSDOT in March 2008 since the roadway is a State Route. Pedestrian refuge islands and
crosswalks are identified as a pedestrian safety feature in the WSDOT design manual. The benefits of
pedestrian refuge islands are, 1) reduces the number of pedestrian-vehicle conflicts by allowing
pedestrians to cross one lane at a time and judge conflicts with oncoming vehicles separately, and 2)
eliminates the crossing of an open two-lane left turn that may have vehicles entering and turning either
direction. The new pedestrian refuge islands do limit the deceleration distance and the storage for left
turn vehicles at the Methodist Church parking lot and Hindley Lane. Both left turns have minor left turn
demand on a daily basis and left turn queues are minimal due to low traffic volumes and low left turn
demand. The location of the refuge islands was selected following a thorough evaluation of existing sight
distances and maintaining access to driveways and streets. Mayor Haakenson advised Mr. Hertrich has
brought his concerns to staff several times and staff has been unsuccessful in their attempts to reach him
to discuss the matter.
COUNCILMEMBER WAMBOLT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PETERSON,
TO EXTEND THE MEETING UNTIL 10:15 P.M. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
(Council President Wilson was not present for the vote.)
Mayor Haakenson objected to Mr. Hertrich’s uncivil behavior, calling him a liar.
10. EXECUTIVE SESSION REGARDING THE NEGOTIATION OF THE PURCHASE OF REAL
ESTATE.
At 10:04 p.m., Mayor Haakenson recessed the Council to an Executive Session regarding negotiation of
the purchase of real estate. He anticipated the Council would take action at the conclusion of the
Executive Session. The meeting was reconvened at 10:10 p.m.
COUNCILMEMBER BERNHEIM MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PLUNKETT,
THAT THE CITY ACQUIRE THE PARCEL AT 939 MAIN STREET FOR THE PRICE OF
$39,000 PAYABLE FROM THE 126 FUND. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. (Council
President Wilson was not present for the vote.)
Mayor Haakenson explained the Council authorized the purchase of two lots in the Shell Creek Basin off
Main Street where the Council has acquired property previously with the hope that someday the City can
acquire the entire wetland area.
11. MAYOR'S COMMENTS
Mayor Haakenson referred to news reports about banks failing and developer foreclosures. He explained
last spring when the banking crisis was at its peak, he asked the Finance Director to look at the banks the
City was using to ensure the City’s investments were covered by FDIC. At that time the City withdrew
most of its money out of one bank and deposited it into another bank. He requested both banks meet with
him and the Interim Finance Director regarding how the investments are protected under the new bank
industry rules. They met today with Pat Fahey, the Chairman of Frontier Bank, who assured the City’s
Packet Page 21 of 225
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
October 20, 2009
Page 19
investments were protected by a number of guarantees. He also planned to meet with the Chairman of
Cascade Bank. He happened to be meeting with Councilmember Wambolt, Chair of the Finance
Committee, this morning on another matter and asked him to join the meeting with Mr. Fahey.
Councilmember Wambolt advised this meeting was also prompted by the report in the Everett Herald that
Frontier Bank was suing a prominent local developer for $40 million. Mr. Fahey assured that would not
be a problem for the bank.
Mayor Haakenson next reported the Edmonds Post Office property is on the market for $4.15 million.
The lease for the post office runs through August 2010. The Post Office plans to find a location
downtown to maintain a retail storefront. The vehicles have already been moved to Perrinville.
Mayor Haakenson referred to the Council’s reception with the Finance Director candidates prior to
tonight’s meeting and invited Council to forward him any comments. He planned to make a decision by
Friday and confirmation of his selection would be on the October 27 agenda.
Mayor Haakenson announced the Edmonds Shopping Center application for the waterfront parcel was
withdrawn today. The article he wrote will be published next week; however, because it was written last
week, it would not reflect that the application had been withdrawn. The applicant plans to reapply and
start again.
12. COUNCIL COMMENTS
Councilmember Peterson referred to the tree removal at 5th & Dayton and the Council authorization to
purchase property, reminding the public to see the forest through the trees. Although the City may have
lost a couple trees, better trees would be planted for the long term. The parcels that the Council
authorized the purchase of will add to the environmental strength of the community, a step to securing
that entire stretch of land and a great investment for the future.
Councilmember Orvis reminded the Snohomish County Health Board was working with its partners on
flu shot clinics on Halloween. He advised the City’s website now had a link to the SnoCoFlu website.
Councilmember Bernheim reported he received his flu shot at Bartell’s. He suggested using some of the
$97,000 Council contingency that was discovered to fund internet access for the Council and public
during meetings.
Councilmember Bernheim expressed his sincere appreciation for the process that led to the selection of
the three excellent Finance Director finalists. With regard to the trees, he looked forward to having trees
on the 5th & Dayton corner that everyone could be proud of.
With regard to civility, Councilmember Bernheim explained he was accused via email by the Planning
Board Chair of stealing draft Planning Board minutes. He was hopeful such comments would not be
repeated.
Mayor Haakenson advised Mr. Hines was preparing documentation for the Council with regard to the
$97,000 Council Contingency Fund and whether that amount was already included in the budget.
Mayor Haakenson commented although he was not a party to the emails Councilmember Bernheim
referred to, he urged the Planning Board and the Economic Development Commission to do their jobs and
planned to send out an email to that effect.
13. ADJOURN
With no further business, the Council meeting was adjourned at 10:23 p.m.
Packet Page 22 of 225
AM-2564 2.C.
Approval of Claim Checks and Payroll Direct Deposit and Checks
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:10/27/2009
Submitted By:Debbie Karber
Submitted For:Lorenzo Hines Time:Consent
Department:Finance Type:Action
Review Committee:
Committee Action:Approved for Consent Agenda
Information
Subject Title
Approval of claim checks #114865 through #114981 dated October 22, 2009 for $537,990.94.
Approval of payroll direct deposits and checks #48678 through #48713 for the pay period October
1 through October 15, 2009 for $819,291.29.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Approval of claim checks and direct deposit and checks.
Previous Council Action
N/A
Narrative
In accordance with the State statutes, City payments must be approved by the City Council.
Ordinance #2896 delegates this approval to the Council President who reviews and recommends
either approval or non-approval of expenditures.
Fiscal Impact
Fiscal Year:2009
Revenue:
Expenditure:$1,357,282.23
Fiscal Impact:
Claims: $537,990.94
Payroll: $819,291.29
Attachments
Link: Claim cks 10-22-09
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 Finance Debra Sharp 10/22/2009 08:31 AM APRV
2 City Clerk Sandy Chase 10/22/2009 08:47 AM APRV
3 Mayor Gary Haakenson 10/22/2009 08:52 AM APRV
4 Final Approval Sandy Chase 10/22/2009 08:54 AM APRV
Packet Page 23 of 225
Form Started By: Debbie
Karber
Started On: 10/21/2009 05:08
PM
Final Approval Date: 10/22/2009
Packet Page 24 of 225
10/21/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
1
4:44:40PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
114865 10/22/2009 065413 ALPINE TREE SERVICE 2054 YOST PARK TREE REMOVAL
YOST PARK~
125.000.640.576.800.480.00 1,600.00
9.5% Sales Tax
125.000.640.576.800.480.00 152.00
MAPLEWOOD PARK TREE REMOVAL2055
MAPLEWOOD PARK TAKEDOWN OF DEAD TREES,
125.000.640.576.800.480.00 1,275.00
9.5% Sales Tax
125.000.640.576.800.480.00 121.13
PINE RIDGE PARK TREE REMOVAL2056
PINE RIDGE PARK~
125.000.640.576.800.480.00 325.00
9.5% Sales Tax
125.000.640.576.800.480.00 30.88
Total :3,504.01
114866 10/22/2009 001375 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION 03535-091001 Membership Chave 1/1 to 12/31/2010
Membership Chave 1/1 to 12/31/2010
001.000.620.558.600.490.00 623.00
Planning Adv Serv/Zoning Practice040706-091001
Planning Adv Serv/Zoning Practice
001.000.620.558.600.490.00 830.00
Membership Coccia 1/1/ to 12/31/2010162458-091001
Membership Coccia 1/1/ to 12/31/2010
001.000.620.558.600.490.00 255.00
Total :1,708.00
114867 10/22/2009 069751 ARAMARK 655-4545207 UNIFORM SERVICES
PARK MAINTENANCE UNIFORM SERVICES
001.000.640.576.800.240.00 34.04
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.240.00 3.23
Total :37.27
1Page:
Packet Page 25 of 225
10/21/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
2
4:44:40PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
114868 10/22/2009 069751 ARAMARK 655-4545211 21580001
UNIFORMS
411.000.656.538.800.240.00 93.07
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.240.00 8.84
Total :101.91
114869 10/22/2009 001702 AWC EMPLOY BENEFIT TRUST November 2009 NOVEMBER 2009 AWC PREMIUMS
11/09 Fire Pension AWC Premiums
617.000.510.522.200.230.00 3,824.50
11/09 Retirees AWC Premiums
009.000.390.517.370.230.00 24,886.70
11/09 Gaydos AWC Premiums
001.000.510.526.100.230.00 1,188.13
11/09 AWC Premiums
811.000.000.231.510.000.00 304,562.53
Total :334,461.86
114870 10/22/2009 072581 BARK TIME BLOWER TRUCK SERVICE 6397 YARD WASTE
YARD WASTE
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 189.50
YARD WASTE6398
YARD WASTE
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 151.60
YARD WASTE6400
YARD WASTE
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 151.60
YARD WASTE6402
YARD WASTE
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 151.60
YARD WASTE6406
YARD WASTE
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 189.50
Total :833.80
114871 10/22/2009 002500 BLUMENTHAL UNIFORM CO INC 765828-01 INV#765828-01 - EDMONDS PD - CRYSTAL
2Page:
Packet Page 26 of 225
10/21/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
3
4:44:40PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
114871 10/22/2009 (Continued)002500 BLUMENTHAL UNIFORM CO INC
SUREFIRE "DG12 " FOR S&W, M&P
001.000.410.521.210.310.00 89.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.210.310.00 8.46
INV#770351-01 EDMONDS PD - SUTTON770351-01
S/S UNIFORM SHIRT
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 65.66
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 6.24
INV#772938 EDMONDS PD - FROLAND772938
UNIFORM WARRIOR PANTS-NAVY
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 39.95
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 3.80
Total :213.11
114872 10/22/2009 072005 BROCKMANN, KERRY BROCKMANN11502 YOGA CLASSES
YOGA #11502
001.000.640.575.540.410.00 808.78
YOGA #11507
001.000.640.575.540.410.00 571.34
Total :1,380.12
114873 10/22/2009 069295 BROWN, CANDY BROWN11282 BACKYARD BIRDS
BACKYARD BIRDS #11282
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 100.10
Total :100.10
114874 10/22/2009 072075 CAMPBELL, RICHARD 2009-10-1 ALS PROF SERVICES
Oct '09 med prgm serv dir
001.000.510.526.100.410.00 1,725.00
ALS PROF SERVICES2009-10-2
Sept '09 med prgm dir
001.000.510.526.100.410.00 1,725.00
3Page:
Packet Page 27 of 225
10/21/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
4
4:44:40PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :3,450.0011487410/22/2009 072075 072075 CAMPBELL, RICHARD
114875 10/22/2009 072974 CASTELLON, MOISES 072974 Tuition reimbursement 8/3 - 9/27/09
Tuition reimbursement 8/3 - 9/27/09
001.000.220.516.100.490.00 1,385.00
Total :1,385.00
114876 10/22/2009 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY LY149250 ALS SUPPLIES
medical oxygen
001.000.510.526.100.310.00 45.96
Freight
001.000.510.526.100.310.00 17.50
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.510.526.100.310.00 6.03
ALS SUPPLIESLY149251
medical oxygen
001.000.510.526.100.310.00 34.47
Freight
001.000.510.526.100.310.00 17.50
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.510.526.100.310.00 4.93
ALS SUPPLIESLY149252
medical oxygen
001.000.510.526.100.310.00 22.98
Freight
001.000.510.526.100.310.00 17.50
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.510.526.100.310.00 3.84
Total :170.71
114877 10/22/2009 065403 CHAPIN, FRANCES CHAPIN1016 WOTS REIMBURSEMENTS
WRITE ON THE SOUND 2009~
117.100.640.573.100.310.00 162.81
Total :162.81
114878 10/22/2009 064840 CHAPUT, KAREN E CHAPUT11576 FRIDAY NIGHT OUT
4Page:
Packet Page 28 of 225
10/21/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
5
4:44:40PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
114878 10/22/2009 (Continued)064840 CHAPUT, KAREN E
FRIDAY NIGHT OUT #11576
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 103.60
Total :103.60
114879 10/22/2009 066382 CINTAS CORPORATION 460532012 UNIFORMS
Stn. 17 - ALS
001.000.510.526.100.240.00 113.19
Stn. 17 - OPS
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 113.19
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.510.526.100.240.00 10.76
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 10.75
OPS UNIFORMS460532029
Stn. 20
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 103.71
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 9.85
Total :361.45
114880 10/22/2009 019215 CITY OF LYNNWOOD 7393 INV#7353, CUST #1430, EDMONDS PD
VERIZON PHONE 09/09 - NARCS
104.000.410.521.210.420.00 89.31
Total :89.31
114881 10/22/2009 069659 CITY OF SEATTLE, SEATTLE PARKS & RECROMERO47032 PESTICIDE RECERTIFICATION SEMINAR
REGISTRATION FEE FOR PESTICIDE LICENSE
001.000.640.576.800.490.00 100.00
Total :100.00
114882 10/22/2009 003801 CITY WIDE FENCE CO INC 25469 CHAIN-LINK FENCING
CHAIN-LINK FENCING
411.000.656.538.800.410.11 3,060.00
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.410.11 290.70
5Page:
Packet Page 29 of 225
10/21/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
6
4:44:40PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :3,350.7011488210/22/2009 003801 003801 CITY WIDE FENCE CO INC
114883 10/22/2009 004095 COASTWIDE LABS W2106658-1 BOTTLE & CAN RECYCLING CONTAINER
GLUTTON BOTTLE & CAN RECYCLING
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 263.12
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 25.00
SOAPW2117237
SOAP
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 690.52
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 65.60
Total :1,044.24
114884 10/22/2009 004095 COASTWIDE LABS W2114998 005302
LINERS/SOAP/POWDERED SOAP
411.000.656.538.800.310.23 310.69
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.23 29.52
005302W2115670
HAND SOAP
411.000.656.538.800.310.23 88.32
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.23 8.39
Total :436.92
114885 10/22/2009 065683 CORRY'S FINE DRY CLEANING Sept 2009 DRY CLEANING/LAUNDRY 09/09 EDMONDS PD
DRY CLEANING FOR SEPT 2009
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 691.68
Total :691.68
114886 10/22/2009 064531 DINES, JEANNIE 09-3034 ECON DEV COMMISSION MINUTETAKER 9/16/09
Economic Development Commission
001.000.240.513.110.410.00 174.00
Total :174.00
114887 10/22/2009 064531 DINES, JEANNIE 09-3039 MINUTE TAKING
6Page:
Packet Page 30 of 225
10/21/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7
4:44:40PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
114887 10/22/2009 (Continued)064531 DINES, JEANNIE
10/13 Council Minutes
001.000.250.514.300.410.00 411.00
Total :411.00
114888 10/22/2009 007253 DUNN LUMBER 09270465 LUMBER
2 X 6 LUMBER
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 88.40
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 8.40
Total :96.80
114889 10/22/2009 061580 ECKSTROM INDUSTRIES 00043933 Fabricate clay feed hopper
Fabricate clay feed hopper
412.100.630.594.320.650.00 1,071.67
Fabricate clay feed hopper
412.200.630.594.320.650.00 1,071.67
Fabricate clay feed hopper
412.300.630.594.320.650.00 1,071.66
Sales Tax
412.300.630.594.320.650.00 98.60
Sales Tax
412.200.630.594.320.650.00 98.59
Sales Tax
412.100.630.594.320.650.00 98.59
Total :3,510.78
114890 10/22/2009 070683 EDMONDS MAIL & PARCEL 17350 UPS/PROSPECT CONSTRUCTION
UPS/PROSPECT CONSTRUCTION
411.000.656.538.800.420.00 33.51
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.420.00 3.18
Total :36.69
114891 10/22/2009 008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION 1-00575 CITY PARK
7Page:
Packet Page 31 of 225
10/21/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
8
4:44:40PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
114891 10/22/2009 (Continued)008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION
CITY PARK
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 363.84
BRACKETT'S LANDING RESTROOM1-00825
BRACKETT'S LANDING RESTROOM
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 850.00
SPRINKLER1-00875
SPRINKLER
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 31.97
CITY PARK SPRINKLER METER1-02125
CITY PARK SPRINKLER METER
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 62.59
SPRINKLER1-03900
SPRINKLER
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 74.84
SPRINKLER1-05125
SPRINKLER
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 101.38
GAZEBO IRRIGATION1-05285
GAZEBO IRRIGATION
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 38.09
CORNER PARK1-05340
CORNER PARK
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 56.47
EDMONDS CITY PARK1-05650
EDMONDS CITY PARK
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 23.80
PARKS MAINTENANCE SHOP1-05675
PARKS MAINTENANCE SHOP
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 861.67
EDMONDS CITY PARK1-05700
EDMONDS CITY PARK
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 158.55
CORNER PARK1-09650
CORNER PARK
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 58.51
8Page:
Packet Page 32 of 225
10/21/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
9
4:44:40PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
114891 10/22/2009 (Continued)008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION
SW CORNER SPRINKLER1-09800
SW CORNER SPRINKLER
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 62.59
PLANTER1-10780
PLANTER
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 83.01
CORNER PLANTER ON 5TH1-16130
CORNER PLANTER ON 5TH
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 76.88
CITY HALL TRIANGLE1-16450
CITY HALL TRIANGLE
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 152.92
6TH & MAIN PLANTER BOX1-16630
6TH & MAIN PLANTER BOX
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 62.59
5TH & DAYTON ST PLANTER1-17475
5TH & DAYTON ST PLANTER
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 62.59
PINE STREE PLAYFIELD1-19950
PINE STREE PLAYFIELD
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 48.12
WATER1-36255
1141 9TH AVE S
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 42.17
Total :3,272.58
114892 10/22/2009 062212 EDWARDS, CLIFF EDWARDS1012 TRAVEL REIMBURSEMENT
MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT FOR WCFA
130.000.640.536.200.430.00 359.83
Total :359.83
114893 10/22/2009 069380 FBINAA WASHINGTON CHAPTER FBINAA 12/1/09 12/1/09 TRAINING - GANNON - EDMONDS
FBI INTERROGATION OF S. HUSSEIN
001.000.410.521.400.490.00 35.00
9Page:
Packet Page 33 of 225
10/21/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
10
4:44:40PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :35.0011489310/22/2009 069380 069380 FBINAA WASHINGTON CHAPTER
114894 10/22/2009 063181 FITTINGS INC 00058202 Shop - Parts
Shop - Parts
511.000.657.548.680.350.00 206.08
Total :206.08
114895 10/22/2009 010665 FOSTER PEPPER PLLC 932655 LEGAL FEES FIBER OPTICS UTILITY SYS
Sept-09 Legal fees for Fiber Optics
001.000.310.518.870.410.00 12,016.30
Total :12,016.30
114896 10/22/2009 072515 GOOGLE INC 876692 INTERNET ANTI-VIRUS & SPAM MAINT FEE
Oct-09 Internet Anti-Virus & Spam Maint
001.000.310.518.880.480.00 548.45
Total :548.45
114897 10/22/2009 006030 HDR ENGINEERING INC 119377-R E4GA.Services thru 06/27/09
E4GA.Services thru 06/27/09
412.300.630.594.320.410.00 6,504.15
E4GA.Services thru 08/01/09128017-R
E4GA.Services thru 08/01/09
412.300.630.594.320.410.00 3,998.41
E4GA.Services thru 08/29/09137941-R
E4GA.Services thru 08/29/09
412.300.630.594.320.410.00 631.89
Total :11,134.45
114898 10/22/2009 069332 HEALTHFORCE OCCMED 1030-135 Drug testing services 8/17/09
Drug testing services 8/17/09
411.000.652.542.900.410.00 35.00
Drug testing services 9/9/09
411.000.652.542.900.410.00 50.00
Total :85.00
114899 10/22/2009 069332 HEALTHFORCE OCCMED 5651-27 INV 5651-27 DIVE PHYSICALS - EDMONDS PD
10Page:
Packet Page 34 of 225
10/21/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
11
4:44:40PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
114899 10/22/2009 (Continued)069332 HEALTHFORCE OCCMED
9/2/09 - DIVE BASELINE - TREADMILL AND
001.000.410.521.220.410.00 343.00
9/24/09 - DIVING SURVEILLANCE EXAM &
001.000.410.521.220.410.00 204.00
9/29/09 - DIVE BASELINE - SPIROMETRY
001.000.410.521.220.410.00 57.00
Total :604.00
114900 10/22/2009 071368 HEFFERAN, BRIGITTE HEFFERAN11536 CALLIGRAPHY CLASSES
CALLIGRAPHY #11536
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 655.20
Total :655.20
114901 10/22/2009 072647 HERRERA ENVIRONMENTAL 21066 E8FD.Services thru 09/25/09
E8FD.Services thru 09/25/09
412.200.630.594.320.410.00 10,125.55
Total :10,125.55
114902 10/22/2009 013350 HIGHLAND, SCOTT E3JC.8,9,10 Services thru 10/16/09
Services thru 10/16/09
412.100.630.594.320.410.00 1,617.14
Total :1,617.14
114903 10/22/2009 072869 HINES, JR, LORENZO 10/20/09 Invoice for contract services - hours
Invoice for contract services - hours
001.000.310.514.230.410.00 2,505.00
Total :2,505.00
114904 10/22/2009 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 1010262 FAC - Repair Supplies
FAC - Repair Supplies
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 14.71
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 1.40
11Page:
Packet Page 35 of 225
10/21/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
12
4:44:40PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
114904 10/22/2009 (Continued)067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES
FAC Artwork - Supplies1045519
FAC Artwork - Supplies
117.200.640.575.500.310.00 61.74
9.5% Sales Tax
117.200.640.575.500.310.00 5.87
Fac Maint - Unit 5 - Meas Tape1095582
Fac Maint - Unit 5 - Meas Tape
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 7.97
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 0.76
Old PW - Door Stop1282060
Old PW - Door Stop
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 10.48
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 1.00
FAC - Supplies1588719
FAC - Supplies
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 22.62
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 2.15
PS - Door Hinges2045239
PS - Door Hinges
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 33.08
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 3.14
Sewer - Gray Seal2591224
Sewer - Gray Seal
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 22.96
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 2.18
Parks - Plastic Bags3035896
Parks - Plastic Bags
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 6.86
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 0.65
12Page:
Packet Page 36 of 225
10/21/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
13
4:44:40PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
114904 10/22/2009 (Continued)067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES
Fac Maint - Unit 5 Supplies3045085
Fac Maint - Unit 5 Supplies
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 19.43
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 1.85
Yost Pool - Repair Supplies34969
Yost Pool - Repair Supplies
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 235.25
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 22.35
Sewer - TV Truck - Supplies4040034
Sewer - TV Truck - Supplies
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 63.96
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 6.08
PS - Bolts and washers4044807
PS - Bolts and washers
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 4.56
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 0.43
Parks - Supplies4586132
Parks - Supplies
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 19.49
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 1.85
PS - Repair Materials5038298
PS - Repair Materials
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 153.63
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 14.59
Parks - Screws5095332
Parks - Screws
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 43.38
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 4.12
13Page:
Packet Page 37 of 225
10/21/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
14
4:44:40PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
114904 10/22/2009 (Continued)067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES
Fishing Pier - Supplies584225
Fishing Pier - Supplies
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 7.78
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 0.74
Fac Maint - Supplies - Sprayer6038010
Fac Maint - Supplies - Sprayer
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 89.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 8.46
Yost Pool - Sprayer returned6274244
Yost Pool - Sprayer returned
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 -89.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 -8.46
FAC - Wipes, supplies6571897
FAC - Wipes, supplies
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 31.59
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 3.00
FAC Art Grid - Suppliies7037690
FAC Art Grid - Suppliies
117.200.640.575.500.310.00 26.83
9.5% Sales Tax
117.200.640.575.500.310.00 2.55
FAC Art Grid - Supplies7046314
FAC Art Grid - Supplies
117.200.640.575.500.310.00 19.92
9.5% Sales Tax
117.200.640.575.500.310.00 1.89
Fac Maint - Shop Supplies8037480
Fac Maint - Shop Supplies
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 67.33
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 6.40
14Page:
Packet Page 38 of 225
10/21/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
15
4:44:40PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
114904 10/22/2009 (Continued)067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES
Library - Supplies8081434
Library - Supplies
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 34.92
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 3.32
Yost Pool - Trash Bags9035113
Yost Pool - Trash Bags
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 11.72
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 1.11
Yost Pool - Supplies9035249
Yost Pool - Supplies
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 11.97
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 1.14
Fac Maint - Flash lite, supplies9040940
Fac Maint - Flash lite, supplies
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 48.72
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 4.63
Sewer - 30 second cleaner9090692
Sewer - 30 second cleaner
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 9.26
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 0.88
Yost Pool - Pipe supplies9250596
Yost Pool - Pipe suppliesg
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 -30.78
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 -2.93
Yost Pool - Utility Pump, Supplies,9256850
Yost Pool - Utility Pump, Supplies,
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 -97.57
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 -9.27
15Page:
Packet Page 39 of 225
10/21/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
16
4:44:40PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
114904 10/22/2009 (Continued)067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES
Fac Maint - Supplies9564346
Fac Maint - Supplies
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 26.71
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 2.54
City Hall - Down Spout Repair Supplies9564376
City Hall - Down Spout Repair Supplies
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 27.11
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 2.58
Water - Supplies - Tape Measurer9573311
Water - Supplies - Tape Measurer
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 8.88
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 0.84
Street - 500W Hal Bulbs for Shop9591708
Street - 500W Hal Bulbs for Shop
111.000.653.542.640.310.00 71.80
9.5% Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.640.310.00 6.82
Svc FeesFCH-003437960
Svc Fees
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 20.00
Total :1,110.97
114905 10/22/2009 070042 IKON FINANCIAL SERVICES 80537413 LEASE ENG COPIER
Lease Eng copier
001.000.620.558.800.450.00 443.48
Lease DSD large copier 10-1 to 10-31-0980537417
Lease DSD large copier 10-1 to 10-31-09
001.000.620.558.800.450.00 827.00
Total :1,270.48
114906 10/22/2009 006841 IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS 5012572193 Copies Recp copier 9-1 to 9-31-09
16Page:
Packet Page 40 of 225
10/21/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
17
4:44:40PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
114906 10/22/2009 (Continued)006841 IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS
Copies Recp copier 9-1 to 9-31-09
001.000.620.558.800.450.00 70.51
DSD LARGE COPIER BW COPIES5012572194
DSD Large copier BW copies
001.000.620.558.800.450.00 204.22
Total :274.73
114907 10/22/2009 071634 INTEGRA TELECOM 5985907 C/A 768328
PR1-2 City Phone Service thru 10/11/09
001.000.310.518.880.420.00 817.51
Total :817.51
114908 10/22/2009 014940 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS ED3727 INV#ED3727 - EDMONDS PD
AA ALKALINE BATTERIES
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 56.16
AAA ALKALINE BATTERIES
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 28.08
CR123 PANASONIC BATTERIES
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 29.90
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 10.85
Total :124.99
114909 10/22/2009 015270 JCI JONES CHEMICALS INC 447536 54278825
HYPOCHLORITE SOLUTION
411.000.656.538.800.310.53 3,591.58
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.53 341.20
Total :3,932.78
114910 10/22/2009 072199 JONES & STOKES ASSOCIATES INC 0066124 E7AD.Services thru 09/30/09
E7AD.Services thru 09/30/09
112.200.630.595.440.410.00 1,259.28
Total :1,259.28
114911 10/22/2009 070902 KAREN ULVESTAD PHOTOGRAPHY ULVESTAD11692 DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHY CLASS
17Page:
Packet Page 41 of 225
10/21/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
18
4:44:40PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
114911 10/22/2009 (Continued)070902 KAREN ULVESTAD PHOTOGRAPHY
DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHY~
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 175.50
Total :175.50
114912 10/22/2009 072728 KAVADAS, JANET KAVADAS11631 PERSONAL TRAINING
PERSONAL TRAINING #11631
001.000.640.575.540.410.00 28.00
Total :28.00
114913 10/22/2009 016600 KROESENS INC 99118 OPS UNIFORMS
Martin boots
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 139.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 13.21
Total :152.21
114914 10/22/2009 016850 KUKER RANKEN INC 354918-001 Spiral Notebook Transit
Spiral Notebook Transit
001.000.620.558.800.310.00 13.00
Alvin Mini Engineers Scale w/case
001.000.620.558.800.310.00 13.95
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.620.558.800.310.00 2.56
Total :29.51
114915 10/22/2009 017050 KWICK'N KLEEN CAR WASH 10062009-03 City Vehicle Car Washes
City Vehicle Car Washes
511.000.657.548.680.480.00 15.09
Total :15.09
114916 10/22/2009 017135 LANDAU ASSOCIATES INC 25713 E7FA.Pak Slides-Manhole Abandonment
E7FA.Pak Slides-Manhole Abandonment
412.200.630.594.320.410.00 1,987.50
Total :1,987.50
114917 10/22/2009 017135 LANDAU ASSOCIATES INC 25716 Prof Serv Isaacson SFR Geotech ~
18Page:
Packet Page 42 of 225
10/21/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
19
4:44:40PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
114917 10/22/2009 (Continued)017135 LANDAU ASSOCIATES INC
Prof Serv Isaacson SFR Geotech ~
001.000.000.245.900.621.00 500.00
Total :500.00
114918 10/22/2009 068711 LAWN EQUIPMENT SUPPLY 10009-203 EDGER & ACCESSORIES
POWER TRIM EDGER, PULLEY AND BELT
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 48.40
Freight
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 5.75
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 5.14
Total :59.29
114919 10/22/2009 018950 LYNNWOOD AUTO PARTS INC 587290 Unit 650 - Yellow Paint Marker
Unit 650 - Yellow Paint Marker
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 3.29
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 0.31
Unit 338- ATF587292
Unit 338- ATF
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 22.95
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 2.18
Unit 650 - Brake supplies587326
Unit 650 - Brake supplies
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 7.19
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 0.68
Unit 121 - ATF587566
Unit 121 - ATF
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 32.94
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 3.13
19Page:
Packet Page 43 of 225
10/21/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
20
4:44:40PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
114919 10/22/2009 (Continued)018950 LYNNWOOD AUTO PARTS INC
Unit 121 - Fuel Infector587982
Unit 121 - Fuel Infector
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 10.80
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 1.03
Unit 475 - Elect Flasher588053
Unit 475 - Elect Flasher
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 17.95
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 1.71
Unit 424 - Lamp588272
Unit 424 - Lamp
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 9.39
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 0.89
Unit 492 - Oil Filter588281
Unit 492 - Oil Filter
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 2.70
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 0.26
Unit 95 - Fuel Filter Return588538
Unit 95 - Fuel Filter Return
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 -14.87
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 -1.41
Unit 95 - Oil Filter588539
Unit 95 - Oil Filter
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 2.70
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 0.26
Unit 138 - Oil Filters588917
Unit 138 - Oil Filters
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 10.42
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 0.99
20Page:
Packet Page 44 of 225
10/21/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
21
4:44:40PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
114919 10/22/2009 (Continued)018950 LYNNWOOD AUTO PARTS INC
Unit 8 - Filter589089
Unit 8 - Filter
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 5.58
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 0.53
Total :121.60
114920 10/22/2009 020039 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO 36246645 E8GC.Clay Feeder Supplies
E8GC.Clay Feeder Supplies
412.100.630.594.320.650.00 3.31
E8GC.Clay Feeder Supplies
412.200.630.594.320.650.00 3.31
E8GC.Clay Feeder Supplies
412.300.630.594.320.650.00 3.32
E8GC.Clay Feeder Supplies
412.100.630.594.320.650.00 7.58
E8GC.Clay Feeder Supplies
412.200.630.594.320.650.00 7.58
E8GC.Clay Feeder Supplies
412.300.630.594.320.650.00 7.57
E8GC.Air-Lift Table/Clay Feeder
412.100.630.594.320.650.00 980.31
E8GC.Air-Lift Table/Clay Feeder
412.200.630.594.320.650.00 980.31
E8GC.Air-Lift Table/Clay Feeder
412.300.630.594.320.650.00 980.30
Shipping Charge
412.100.630.594.320.650.00 87.39
Shipping Charge
412.200.630.594.320.650.00 87.39
Shipping Charge
412.300.630.594.320.650.00 87.40
Total :3,235.77
114921 10/22/2009 020039 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO 39156291 123106800
21Page:
Packet Page 45 of 225
10/21/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
22
4:44:40PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
114921 10/22/2009 (Continued)020039 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO
PIPE FITTING/HACKSAW BLADE/BALL -PEEN
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 117.42
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 6.90
12310680039317202
HOSE COUPLING/PIPE FITTING/SPRAY NOZZLE
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 436.58
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 11.43
12310680039603304
PIPE FITTINGS/SPRAY NOZZLE
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 389.82
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 11.72
12310680039642684
BRAIDED ROPE
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 356.80
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 17.91
12310680039768284
ROUTER BIT/DEBURRING TOOL/STRUT CHANNEL
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 652.31
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 86.80
12310680039829288
O RING/PIPE FITTING
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 385.74
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 10.57
Total :2,484.00
114922 10/22/2009 072927 METALFAB INC 9996 E8GC.Materials for Clay Feed Project
22Page:
Packet Page 46 of 225
10/21/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
23
4:44:40PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
114922 10/22/2009 (Continued)072927 METALFAB INC
E8GC.Materials for Clay Feed Project
412.100.630.594.320.650.00 2,977.67
E8GC.Materials for Clay Feed Project
412.200.630.594.320.650.00 2,977.67
E8GC.Materials for Clay Feed Project
412.300.630.594.320.650.00 2,977.66
Total :8,933.00
114923 10/22/2009 072927 METALFAB INC 10029 FREIGHT CHARGES/MACHINERY
FREIGHT CHARGES/MACHINERY
412.100.630.594.320.650.00 477.72
FREIGHT CHARGES/MACHINERY
412.200.630.594.320.650.00 477.72
FREIGHT CHARGES/MACHINERY
412.300.630.594.320.650.00 477.72
Total :1,433.16
114924 10/22/2009 072953 NAGATA, CAROLYN BLD2009-0680 Overpayment of Eng Inspection Fee
Overpayment of Eng Inspection Fee
001.000.000.257.620.000.00 10.00
Total :10.00
114925 10/22/2009 024302 NELSON PETROLEUM 0412921-IN Fleet Filter Inventory Returns
Fleet Filter Inventory Returns
511.000.657.548.680.340.40 -36.00
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.340.40 -3.42
Fleet - Filter Inventory0413374-IN
Fleet - Filter Inventory
511.000.657.548.680.340.40 831.55
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.340.40 79.00
23Page:
Packet Page 47 of 225
10/21/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
24
4:44:40PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
114925 10/22/2009 (Continued)024302 NELSON PETROLEUM
Fleet Filter Inventory Returns0413672-IN
Fleet Filter Inventory Returns
511.000.657.548.680.340.40 -5.35
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.340.40 -0.51
Fleet - Filter Inventory0414033-IN
Fleet - Filter Inventory
511.000.657.548.680.340.40 34.19
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.340.40 3.25
Fleet Filter Inventory0414103-IN
Fleet Filter Inventory
511.000.657.548.680.340.40 33.12
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.340.40 3.14
Total :938.97
114926 10/22/2009 024600 NEUERT, L L 72 LEOFF 1 Reimbursement
LEOFF 1 Reimbursement
009.000.390.517.370.230.00 1,430.00
Total :1,430.00
114927 10/22/2009 024910 NORMED 24808-575193 INV#24808-575193 EDMONDS PD
24Page:
Packet Page 48 of 225
10/21/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
25
4:44:40PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
114927 10/22/2009 (Continued)024910 NORMED
NUTRALOX ANTACID
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 2.72
PROPRINAL IBUPROFEN
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 16.47
ASPIRIN
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 4.52
CETAFEN EXTRA
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 7.44
CETAFEN COUGH & COLD
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 11.76
RELIEF-SF COLD CAPLETS
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 12.92
ADHV BANDAGES-FINGER TIP
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 4.80
ADHV BANDAGES 1x3
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 6.75
ADHV BANDAGES, SHEER 1x3
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 4.74
Freight
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 10.17
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 7.82
Total :90.11
114928 10/22/2009 061013 NORTHWEST CASCADE INC 1-022883 HONEY BUCKET RENTAL
HONEY BUCKET RENTAL:~
001.000.640.576.800.450.00 792.51
Total :792.51
114929 10/22/2009 063511 OFFICE MAX INC 651368 INV#651368 ACCT#520437 250POL-EDMONDS PD
25Page:
Packet Page 49 of 225
10/21/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
26
4:44:40PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
114929 10/22/2009 (Continued)063511 OFFICE MAX INC
8.5"x11" LEGAL PADS
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 12.44
WITE OUT CORRECTION TAPE
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 17.78
STAPLES
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 6.28
BLACK RETRACTABLE PENS
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 113.50
HP LASERJET S1C4096A (ADMIN)
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 101.41
GREEN HIGHLIGHTER
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 6.34
HP LASERJET S1Q6511A (PATROL)
001.000.410.521.220.310.00 124.17
HP LASERJET S1Q6511X (INVEST)
001.000.410.521.210.310.00 208.95
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 24.49
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.220.310.00 11.80
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.210.310.00 19.85
Total :647.01
114930 10/22/2009 063511 OFFICE MAX INC 643883 Wrist pad
Wrist pad
001.000.610.519.700.310.00 26.87
Archive boxes
001.000.610.519.700.310.00 50.86
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.610.519.700.310.00 7.38
Total :85.11
114931 10/22/2009 063511 OFFICE MAX INC 733134 OFFICE SUPPLIES
26Page:
Packet Page 50 of 225
10/21/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
27
4:44:40PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
114931 10/22/2009 (Continued)063511 OFFICE MAX INC
STAMP PAD REPLACEMENT
001.000.640.574.100.310.00 5.98
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.574.100.310.00 0.57
OFFICE SUPPLIES782965
BLUE PAPER, LASERJET CARTRIDGE
001.000.640.574.100.310.00 109.99
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.574.100.310.00 10.45
Total :126.99
114932 10/22/2009 063511 OFFICE MAX INC 592794 OFFICE SUPPLIES
Office supplies
001.000.250.514.300.310.00 160.89
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.250.514.300.310.00 15.29
OFFICE SUPPLIES604859
Office supplies
001.000.250.514.300.310.00 3.49
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.250.514.300.310.00 0.33
Total :180.00
114933 10/22/2009 063511 OFFICE MAX INC 391511 Office Supplies DSD
Office Supplies DSD
001.000.620.558.800.310.00 17.08
RETURN OF MONTHLY PLANNER556334
Refund for return of office supplies
001.000.620.558.800.310.00 -21.01
DSD office supplies638180
DSD office supplies
001.000.620.558.800.310.00 58.50
Total :54.57
114934 10/22/2009 063511 OFFICE MAX INC 613275 OPS SUPPLIES
27Page:
Packet Page 51 of 225
10/21/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
28
4:44:40PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
114934 10/22/2009 (Continued)063511 OFFICE MAX INC
stations' office supplies
001.000.510.522.200.310.00 194.90
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.200.310.00 18.51
Total :213.41
114935 10/22/2009 070091 PARROTT, CHERYL PARROTT11570 STAINED GLASS SNOWFLAKES
STAINED GLASS: SNOWFLAKES~
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 105.00
Total :105.00
114936 10/22/2009 064552 PITNEY BOWES 3833100OT09 POSTAGE METER LEASE
Lease 9/30 to 10/30
001.000.250.514.300.450.00 866.00
Total :866.00
114937 10/22/2009 029117 PORT OF EDMONDS 04371 UNIT F1 B1 FUEL
Fire Boat - Fuel
511.000.657.548.680.320.00 754.13
Total :754.13
114938 10/22/2009 065105 PORT SUPPLY 8043 Unit M-16 - Clip
Unit M-16 - Clip
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 3.81
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 0.36
Total :4.17
114939 10/22/2009 072843 PRO-CUT TREE SERVICE 0805 STUMP REMOVAL
STUMP REMOVAL
414.000.656.594.320.650.00 300.00
9.5% Sales Tax
414.000.656.594.320.650.00 28.50
Total :328.50
114940 10/22/2009 030400 PUGET SOUND CLEAN AIR AGENCY 09 060S ACCOUNT NO. EDMO005
28Page:
Packet Page 52 of 225
10/21/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
29
4:44:40PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
114940 10/22/2009 (Continued)030400 PUGET SOUND CLEAN AIR AGENCY
Q4-09 Clean Air Assessment per RCW
001.000.390.531.700.510.00 6,235.75
Total :6,235.75
114941 10/22/2009 070955 R&R STAR TOWING 59785 INV#59785 EDMONDS PD #09-3952
TOWING 2007 KIA 595WTU
001.000.410.521.220.410.00 158.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.220.410.00 15.01
Total :173.01
114942 10/22/2009 072802 SCIENCE EXPRESS LLC SCIENCE 11589 PRESCHOOL SCIENCE CLUB
PRESCHOOL SCIENCE CLUB~
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 126.00
Total :126.00
114943 10/22/2009 066964 SEATTLE AUTOMOTIVE DIST INC 03-011439 Unit 720- Switch Assembly
Unit 720- Switch Assembly
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 12.99
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 1.23
Unit 121 - Trans Filter03-011597
Unit 121 - Trans Filter
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 11.88
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 1.13
Unit 39 - Filter Assembly03-012181
Unit 39 - Filter Assembly
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 7.88
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 0.75
29Page:
Packet Page 53 of 225
10/21/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
30
4:44:40PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
114943 10/22/2009 (Continued)066964 SEATTLE AUTOMOTIVE DIST INC
Unit 495 - Pad Kit03-012558
Unit 495 - Pad Kit
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 47.89
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 4.55
Fleet Battery Inventory03-013384
Fleet Battery Inventory
511.000.657.548.680.340.40 284.95
Core Fees
511.000.657.548.680.340.40 32.00
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.340.40 30.11
Unir 128- Sender and Pump Assembly03-013413
Unir 128- Sender and Pump Assembly
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 253.98
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 24.13
Unit 128 - Brake Pad03-013416
Unit 128 - Brake Pad
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 33.88
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 3.22
Unit 491- Element03-013787
Unit 491- Element
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 39.88
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 3.79
Unit 95 - Tensioner03-013801
Unit 95 - Tensioner
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 39.88
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 3.79
30Page:
Packet Page 54 of 225
10/21/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
31
4:44:40PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
114943 10/22/2009 (Continued)066964 SEATTLE AUTOMOTIVE DIST INC
Unit 650 - Motor and Fan Assembly03-014431
Unit 650 - Motor and Fan Assembly
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 193.88
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 18.42
Unit 650 - Motor and Fan Assembly03-015073
Unit 650 - Motor and Fan Assembly
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 193.88
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 18.42
Unit 113 - Brake Supplies03-015671
Unit 113 - Brake Supplies
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 93.84
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 8.91
Unit 113 - Parts03-015690
Unit 113 - Parts
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 145.76
Core Fees
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 200.00
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 32.85
Unit 491 - Air Cleaner Assembly03-13723
Unit 491 - Air Cleaner Assembly
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 17.88
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 1.70
Fleet Returns Jumper Wireing, Fuel Pump05-320539
Fleet Returns Jumper Wireing, Fuel Pumpg
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 -286.87
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 -27.25
31Page:
Packet Page 55 of 225
10/21/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
32
4:44:40PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
114943 10/22/2009 (Continued)066964 SEATTLE AUTOMOTIVE DIST INC
Unit 38 Core Return05-320830
Unit 38 Core Returng
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 -1,000.00
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 -95.00
Return Motor and Fan Assembly05-322695
Return Motor and Fan Assembly
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 -193.88
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 -18.42
Unit 38 - Repair Kit05-595363
Unit 38 - Repair Kit
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 1,889.95
Core Fee
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 1,000.00
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 274.55
Unit 485 - Parts05-602361
Unit 485 - Parts
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 130.98
Core Fees
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 60.00
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 18.14
Total :3,515.65
114944 10/22/2009 036509 SIGNATURE FORMS INC 1091896 INV#1091896, ACCT#CEDM - EDMONDS PD
ANNUAL DOG LICENSE APPS
001.000.410.521.700.310.00 386.10
Freight
001.000.410.521.700.310.00 6.17
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.700.310.00 37.27
Total :429.54
32Page:
Packet Page 56 of 225
10/21/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
33
4:44:40PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
114945 10/22/2009 036950 SIX ROBBLEES INC 1-677113 Unit 424 - Hide-A-Way
Unit 424 - Hide-A-Way
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 260.00
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 24.70
Total :284.70
114946 10/22/2009 036955 SKY NURSERY 282841 CITY HALL PARKING LOT BEDS
PLANTS/TREES FOR CITY HALL PARKING LOT
125.000.640.576.800.310.00 236.64
9.5% Sales Tax
125.000.640.576.800.310.00 22.48
Total :259.12
114947 10/22/2009 037303 SNO CO FIRE DIST # 1 510-1725 TRAINING MISC
NFA STICO reg BK,BN
001.000.510.522.400.490.00 60.00
Total :60.00
114948 10/22/2009 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 2060028723 YOST PARK POOL
YOST PARK POOL
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 1,249.53
Total :1,249.53
114949 10/22/2009 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 181017996 620-001-500-3
VARIOUS LOCATIONS
411.000.656.538.800.471.62 7.02
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.471.62 0.42
206-001-485-5874025868
24400 HIGHWAY 99/RICHMOND PARK
411.000.656.538.800.471.62 28.25
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.471.62 1.70
33Page:
Packet Page 57 of 225
10/21/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
34
4:44:40PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
114949 10/22/2009 (Continued)037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1
463-001-671-7886009762
8421 244TH SW/RICHMOND PARK
411.000.656.538.800.471.62 28.25
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.471.62 1.70
958-001-000-8959020059
WWTP/SNO PUD
411.000.656.538.800.471.61 20,355.40
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.471.61 1,221.32
Total :21,644.06
114950 10/22/2009 072291 SNO-KING COMMUNITY CHORALE SNO-KING CHORALE1020 TOURISM PROMOTION AGREEMENT
TOURISM PROMOTION AGREEMENT
123.000.640.573.100.410.00 600.00
Total :600.00
114951 10/22/2009 065176 SNOHOMISH CO TOURISM BUREAU EdmQTF9 QUARTERLY TOURISM FORUM 9/8/09
Quarterly Tourism Forum Luncheon 9/08/09
001.000.240.513.110.490.00 30.00
Total :30.00
114952 10/22/2009 064351 SNOHOMISH COUNTY TREASURER 2009145 INV#2009145 EDMONDS PD
79.67 BOOKINGS FOR 09/09
001.000.410.523.600.510.00 7,390.19
709.17 HOUSING DAYS FOR 09/09
001.000.410.523.600.510.00 43,337.38
Total :50,727.57
114953 10/22/2009 064996 SPARTAN MOTORS CHASSIS INC IN00408338 Unit 475 - Seals, Bearings, Supplies
34Page:
Packet Page 58 of 225
10/21/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
35
4:44:40PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
114953 10/22/2009 (Continued)064996 SPARTAN MOTORS CHASSIS INC
Unit 475 - Seals, Bearings, Supplies
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 244.32
Freight
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 35.44
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 20.77
Total :300.53
114954 10/22/2009 070677 SPRINT 502779811-022 INV#502779811-022 EDMONDS PD
DATA CARDS 10/07 0 11/06/09
001.000.410.521.220.420.00 169.97
Total :169.97
114955 10/22/2009 069997 SRI TECHNOLOGIES INC 98354 E6DA.Roberts thru 09/26/09
E6DA.Roberts thru 09/26/09
125.000.640.594.750.410.00 1,430.00
E6DB.Roberts thru 09/26/09
112.200.630.595.330.410.00 617.50
Roberts Mileage Expense thru 09/26/09
125.000.640.594.750.410.00 19.25
Roberts Mileage Expense thru 09/26/09
112.200.630.595.330.410.00 19.25
Total :2,086.00
114956 10/22/2009 060371 STANDARD INSURANCE CO 09212009 LTD premiums - 3rd qtr. 2009
LTD premiums - 3rd qtr. 2009
001.000.220.516.100.410.00 121.50
Total :121.50
114957 10/22/2009 046200 STATE OF WASHINGTON Q3-09 Q3-09 Leasehold Tax Liability
Q3-09 Leasehold Tax Liability
001.000.000.237.220.000.00 4,773.12
Total :4,773.12
114958 10/22/2009 071585 STERICYCLE INC 3000643874 INV#3000643874 CUST#6076358 EDMONDS PD
35Page:
Packet Page 59 of 225
10/21/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
36
4:44:40PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
114958 10/22/2009 (Continued)071585 STERICYCLE INC
MINIMUM MONTHLY SERVICE CHG
001.000.410.521.910.410.00 10.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.910.410.00 0.36
Total :10.36
114959 10/22/2009 040917 TACOMA SCREW PRODUCTS INC 18883985 100323
WEDGE ANCHORS
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 101.71
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 9.66
Total :111.37
114960 10/22/2009 009350 THE DAILY HERALD COMPANY 1667819 Civil Service Commission Vacancy
Civil Service Commission Vacancy
001.000.220.516.210.410.00 427.39
Total :427.39
114961 10/22/2009 009350 THE DAILY HERALD COMPANY 1669430 NEWSPAPER AD
10/20 Hearing (Hens)
001.000.250.514.300.440.00 71.40
NEWSPAPER AD1669431
10/20 Hearing (Trans. Plan)
001.000.250.514.300.440.00 105.40
NEWSPAPER AD1669472
10/20 Hearing (Parks Plan)
001.000.250.514.300.440.00 143.12
Total :319.92
114962 10/22/2009 027269 THE PART WORKS INC 263304 CITY WIDE REPLACEMENT FAUCETS
36Page:
Packet Page 60 of 225
10/21/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
37
4:44:40PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
114962 10/22/2009 (Continued)027269 THE PART WORKS INC
REPLACEMENT FAUCETS
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 335.80
Freight
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 16.09
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 33.44
Total :385.33
114963 10/22/2009 041960 TOWN & COUNTRY FENCE INC 40482 HICKMAN PARK FENCING
MATERIAL & LABOR TO INSTALL FENCE @
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 1,281.50
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 121.75
CITY PARK GATE SUPPLIES40499
SELF CLOSURE/GATE
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 20.58
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 1.96
Total :1,425.79
114964 10/22/2009 042750 TRIBUZIO, WALLACE 73 LEOFF 1 Reimbursement
LEOFF 1 Reimbursement
009.000.390.517.370.230.00 57.26
Total :57.26
114965 10/22/2009 043935 UPS 00002T4T13419 Shipping/Printer Techs
Shipping/Printer Techs
001.000.310.518.880.420.00 14.48
Total :14.48
114966 10/22/2009 062693 US BANK 3207 Reimbursed by Registration - PSBF bus
Reimbursed by Registration - PSBF bus
001.000.240.513.110.490.00 276.78
37Page:
Packet Page 61 of 225
10/21/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
38
4:44:40PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
114966 10/22/2009 (Continued)062693 US BANK
South County Mayor's Lunch 9/14/093264
South County Mayor's Lunch 9/14/09
001.000.210.513.100.490.00 20.05
Strategic Thinking Class (HR CEU for3280
Strategic Thinking Class (HR CEU for
001.000.220.516.100.490.00 145.00
Total :441.83
114967 10/22/2009 062693 US BANK 3538 CREDIT CARD TRANSACTIONS
PRE-PAID SUBSCRIPTION
123.000.640.573.100.490.00 357.00
CONFERENCE: CLIFF EDWARDS
130.000.640.536.200.430.00 359.34
JUMP DRIVE
001.000.640.575.520.310.00 14.22
BINDERS, CALENDAR REFILL
001.000.640.574.200.310.00 31.51
DESK PAD
001.000.640.574.200.310.00 5.45
GYMNASTICS BIRTHDAY PARTY SUPPLIES
001.000.640.575.550.310.00 131.64
BOXED LUNCHES FOR WRITE ON THE SOUND
117.100.640.573.100.310.00 901.18
WRITE ON THE SOUND COOKIES AND DRINKS
117.100.640.573.100.310.00 17.09
Total :1,817.43
114968 10/22/2009 062693 US BANK 3306 BLOWER
BLOWER
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 151.19
Total :151.19
114969 10/22/2009 062693 US BANK 3363 SEFAC-Shop Supplies - Plugs Pins and
38Page:
Packet Page 62 of 225
10/21/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
39
4:44:40PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
114969 10/22/2009 (Continued)062693 US BANK
SEFAC-Shop Supplies - Plugs Pins and
511.000.657.548.680.350.00 239.30
The Truck Stop - Unit 138 - Regulator
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 179.04
Fisheries Supply - Unit M16 - Supplies
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 62.40
SEFAC - Shop Supplies
511.000.657.548.680.350.00 136.64
Magic Toyota - Unit 099 - Parts
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 217.32
Svc Fees
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 4.38
Total :839.08
114970 10/22/2009 062693 US BANK 1000 Reg fee Chave - classes
Reg fee Chave - classes
001.000.620.558.600.490.00 1,210.00
Total :1,210.00
114971 10/22/2009 062693 US BANK 3397 STARTZMAN
LT Assessmt supplies
001.000.510.522.100.310.00 55.51
Total :55.51
114972 10/22/2009 062693 US BANK 2462 Payment Manager test
39Page:
Packet Page 63 of 225
10/21/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
40
4:44:40PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
114972 10/22/2009 (Continued)062693 US BANK
Payment Manager test
001.000.310.518.880.490.00 0.01
Printer Techs HP Maint Kits
001.000.310.518.880.310.00 494.00
TigerDirect-3 LCD Monitors
001.000.310.518.880.310.00 473.87
GaiTronics Repair of257-SRV
001.000.310.518.880.480.00 182.73
CDW-G Printer P&R
001.000.640.575.560.310.00 111.98
CDW-G Return Laptop Battery City2462
CDW-G Return Laptop Battery City
001.000.250.514.300.310.00 -102.67
Total :1,159.92
114973 10/22/2009 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST 425-775-1344 BEACH RANGER PHONE @ FISHING PIER
BEACH RANGER PHONE @ FISHING PIER
001.000.640.574.350.420.00 58.25
YOST POOL425-775-2645
YOST POOL
001.000.640.575.510.420.00 47.78
Total :106.03
114974 10/22/2009 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST 425-712-0423 AFTER HOURS PHONE
AFTER HOURS PHONE
411.000.656.538.800.420.00 56.03
Total :56.03
114975 10/22/2009 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST 425-774-0944 FS #20-FAX LINE
FS #20-FAX LINE
001.000.510.522.200.420.00 50.31
Total :50.31
114976 10/22/2009 068259 WA ST CRIMINAL JUSTICE 2011-0088 INV 2011-0088 HAWLEY FOR FTO 0681-3
40Page:
Packet Page 64 of 225
10/21/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
41
4:44:40PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
114976 10/22/2009 (Continued)068259 WA ST CRIMINAL JUSTICE
FTO CLASS 9/21-25 REDMOND
001.000.410.521.400.490.00 60.00
Total :60.00
114977 10/22/2009 065035 WASHINGTON STATE PATROL F1000044 TRAINING MISC
JB,BN,AR
001.000.510.522.400.490.00 400.00
Total :400.00
114978 10/22/2009 061286 WESTERN FLUID COMPONENTS P-07418-0 Unit 91 - Supplies
Unit 91 - Supplies
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 195.67
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 18.59
Total :214.26
114979 10/22/2009 068693 WHATMORE, JEFF 10/14/09 OT from sick leave buy back (9/14
OT from sick leave buy back (9/14
411.000.652.543.700.110.00 27.85
Total :27.85
114980 10/22/2009 071631 WILLIAMS, SUE WILLIAMS11700 SOCKS DEMYSTIFIED
SOCKS DEMYSTIFIED KNITTING CLASS~
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 65.00
Total :65.00
114981 10/22/2009 067465 WOOD, JULIA WOOD11663 GYROKINESIS
GYROKINESIS #11663
001.000.640.575.540.410.00 146.25
Total :146.25
Bank total :537,990.94117 Vouchers for bank code :front
537,990.94Total vouchers :Vouchers in this report117
41Page:
Packet Page 65 of 225
10/21/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
42
4:44:40PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
42Page:
Packet Page 66 of 225
AM-2563 2.D.
Liquor Control Board Lists - September and October
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:10/27/2009
Submitted By:Linda Carl
Submitted For:Gary Haakenson Time:Consent
Department:Mayor's Office Type:Action
Review Committee:
Committee Action:
Information
Subject Title
Approval of list of businesses applying for renewal of their liquor licenses with the Washington
State Liquor Control Board, September and October 2009.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Previous Council Action
Narrative
The City Clerk’s Office, the Police department, and the Mayor’s Office have reviewed the
attached lists and have no concerns with the Washington State Liquor Control Board renewing the
liquor licenses for the listed businesses, with one exception: 5th Ave. Grill House (on the
September list) is no longer open for business.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: WSLCB list - Sept.
Link: WSLCB list - Oct.
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 10/21/2009 04:13 PM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 10/21/2009 04:21 PM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 10/22/2009 08:26 AM APRV
Form Started By: Linda
Carl
Started On: 10/21/2009 03:12
PM
Final Approval Date: 10/22/2009
Packet Page 67 of 225
Packet Page 68 of 225
Packet Page 69 of 225
AM-2567 2.E.
Community Services and Economic Development Quarterly Report
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:10/27/2009
Submitted By:Stephen Clifton Time:Consent
Department:Community Services Type:Information
Review Committee:
Committee Action:
Information
Subject Title
Community Services and Economic Development Quarterly Report –October, 2009.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Previous Council Action
Narrative
As requested by the City Council, this report provides an update on major projects currently
worked on by staff of the Community Services and Economic Development Departments.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: Attachment 1 - CS & ED Department Quarterly Report - October, 2009
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 10/22/2009 03:12 PM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 10/22/2009 03:14 PM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 10/22/2009 03:34 PM APRV
Form Started By: Stephen
Clifton
Started On: 10/22/2009 02:57
PM
Final Approval Date: 10/22/2009
Packet Page 70 of 225
City of Edmonds
Community Services Department
Economic Development Department
Date: October 22, 2009
To: Mayor Haakenson and City Council members
From: Stephen Clifton, AICP
Community Services and Economic Development Director
Subject: Community Services and Economic Development
Quarterly Report – October, 2009
As requested by the City Council, this report provides an update on major projects currently
worked on by staff of the Community Services and Economic Development Departments.
Community Services
I. EDMONDS CROSSING
Project Description
Edmonds Crossing is a regional project intended to provide a long-term solution to current
operational and safety conflicts between ferry, rail, automobile, bus, and pedestrian traffic in
downtown Edmonds and along State Route 104. The Federal Highway Administration
(FHWA), Federal Transit Administration (FTA), Washington State Department of
Transportation (WSDOT) (including Washington State Ferries [WSF]), and City of Edmonds
propose to relocate the existing state ferry terminal from Main Street, in downtown
Edmonds, to Pt. Edwards, south of the downtown core. In the process, a multimodal center
would be established that would integrate ferry, rail, and transit services into a single
complex. A realigned SR 104 from its current intersection with Pine Street would provide
access. The new complex would provide an upgraded ferry terminal designed to meet the
operational requirements for accommodating forecast ferry ridership demand; a new rail
station designed to meet intercity passenger (Amtrak) and commuter rail (Sounder) service;
a transit center that would meet local bus system and regional transit system loading
requirements; facilities that allow both vehicular commuters and walk-on passengers to
utilize various transportation modes; parking, drop-off areas, retail/ concessionaire space,
waiting areas; and a system linking these facilities to allow for the safe movement of users.
City of Edmonds Community Services
Packet Page 71 of 225
Significant Activities Since July 23, 2009
July, August, September and October, 2009 – WSF staff continue to explore minimum
build alternatives / options for Edmonds ferry improvements.
July, August, September and October, 2009 – See Section VIII, regarding updates on
Washington State Department of Transportation Ferries Division Edmonds/Kingston
Ferry Route Partnership Meeting – Reservation System Pre-Design Study
October 14, 2009 – I provided an update on Edmonds Crossing to the Edmonds Planning
Board.
II. SOUND TRANSIT (PHASE 1, AKA SOUND MOVE)
Project Description
During the past few years, Sound Transit has been implementing what is called the Sound
Move Plan. One element calls for commuter rail services, otherwise known as Sounder.
Commuter rail will eventually link Everett in the north with Seattle, Tacoma and Lakewood in
the South, a total of 82 miles through three counties. Sounder is being implemented in
three phases, one of which includes Everett to Seattle. Three commuter rail stations are
planned along this corridor, i.e., Everett, Mukilteo and Edmonds.
Everett-Seattle Sounder, at full operation, now calls for 8 trains per day, i.e., four round trips,
and will include reverse trips. This is a reduction of two round trips from the originally
proposed operational plan. Initial service will be phased in. The first roundtrip train run
began in December, 2003.
Edmonds Station is currently located between Main and Dayton Streets along both sides of
the Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) tracks. The station area is also co-located with
Amtrak’s Edmonds Passenger Station. The existing Sounder commuter rail station includes a
400-foot-long platform, ADA mini-high, two ticket vending machines and parking lot with 200
spaces.
Sound Transit Edmonds Station may be considered an interim facility until such time
Edmonds Crossing construction is completed, or circumstances related to the status of
Edmonds Crossing change. The current Edmonds Station project budget is $13.1M. A total
of $4.0 million has been spent to date for agency administration, preliminary engineering,
temporary improvements, property acquisition, and permits. The remaining budget should be
sufficient to develop final design documents, acquire platform leases and construct the
station per plans reviewed by the City of Edmonds Architectural Design Board and City
Council in 2002.
In an attempt to address future needs in the area, a culvert may be installed, if feasible, near
the Marina Beach property beneath both BNSF Railroad tracks, concurrent with the
construction of a second track. If feasible, this will allow for the eventual daylighting of
Willow Creek if funding is available.
Significant Activities since July 23, 2009
2
Packet Page 72 of 225
July, August, September and October, 2009 – City staff have been meeting with
representatives from BNSF, Sound Transit, Community Transit, Washington State
Department of Transportation, and Washington State Ferries to discuss and review
plans, and coordinate construction schedules related to Sound Transit Edmonds
Commuter Rail Station, BNSF second rail line, and City of Edmonds Lift Stations 7 and 8.
July, August, September and October 2009 – Scott Snyder and I continue to work with
Sound Transit staff on a development agreement for Edmonds Station. Review of the
final draft agreement by the Edmonds and Sound Transit could take place by November
and December, 2009.
October, 2009 – Sound Transit anticipates submitted building and land use permits near
the end of October, 2009.
III. SOUND TRANSIT 2
Expanding the regional mass transit system
Sound Transit 2 will provide regional express bus and commuter rail service while building 36
additional miles of light rail to form a 55-mile regional system. For additional information,
visit http://soundtransit.org/
Significant Activities Since July 23, 2009
July, August, September and October, 2009 – No new information at this time.
IV. UNOCAL AKA CHEVRON SITE CLEANUP
Project Description
The UNOCAL property currently consists of a lower yard which currently contains petroleum
contamination resulting from more than 60 years of operation. Chevron, which acquired
UNOCAL, is now the entity responsible for cleaning up the site. Cleanup work at the lower
yard, which began in 2007, is a continuation of remediation work that has been ongoing at
the site since 2001. Chevron conducted the following work from summer 2007 through fall
2008:
Excavated soil with metals contamination exceeding Washington State Department of
Ecology standards in order to protect against direct contact with the soil (such as
ingestion) and impacts to the groundwater.
Excavated soil with petroleum contamination exceeding safe levels for direct contact.
Excavation of this soil was for protection of groundwater and surface water.
Excavated contaminated sediment in Willow Creek, on the northern edge of the site.
The primary excavation work at the lower yard (including the Willow Creek area) was
complete by September 2008. Over 140,000 tons of contaminated soil and 9,000 gallons of
petroleum product have been removed from the site. The lower yard site has been re-graded
and reseeded. The Willow Creek area has been re-planted with native vegetation.
3
Packet Page 73 of 225
Significant Activities since July 23, 2009
July, August, September and October, 2009 – Monitoring of the site continues.
V. EDMONDS PUBLIC FACILITIES DISTRICT
Overview
The City Council, pursuant to state law, approved the formation of the Public Facilities District
(PFD) at its April 24, 2001 meeting. A PFD is a separate municipal corporation that has
authority to undertake the design, construction, operation, promotion and financing of a
Regional Center in the city. The Public Facilities District board consists of five members
originally appointed by the City Council on June 19, 2001. Phase 1A renovation of the
original Edmonds High School Auditorium into a first class Edmonds Center for the Arts (ECA)
and multipurpose facility was completed in September of 2006.
Significant Activities Since July 23, 2009
September 4, 2009 – I prepared and submitted the Line of Credit Control System (LOCCS)
Voice Response System (VRS) request voucher to the U.S. Housing of Urban
Development. The LOCCS VRS request voucher is the last step to accessing the 2008
federal appropriation (for year 2009) for the Edmonds Center for the Arts. Edmonds
Center for the Arts is now able to access and draw down the funds for improvements
and repairs.
VI. SNOHOMISH COUNTY PAINE FIELD
Overview
On July 14, 2004, a Mead & Hunt Inc. Business Travel Survey was issued which focused on
the market potential and options for Paine Field. On August 20, 2004, a Snohomish County
Citizen Cabinet issued an Economic Development Final Report -Blueprint for the Economic
Future of Snohomish County. Both reports put Paine Field in the regional spotlight as they
highlight the possibility of using Paine Field for commercial aircraft operations, thus changing
its general aviation status.
Significant Activities Since July 23, 2009
July, August, September and October, 2009 – No new information at this time.
VII. RAILROAD QUIET ZONE
Overview
As discussed on a few occasions, there is an expressed desire of the City Council and Port of
Edmonds to establish a full or partial quite zone along the City's shoreline. A quiet zone is a
section of rail line that contains one or more consecutive public crossings at which locomotive
horns are not routinely sounded.
Significant Activities Since July 23, 2009
August 12, 2009 – BNSF notified the City of Edmonds that fencing installed at the
Meadowdale Marina has been completed and whistle signs have been taken down. BNSF
4
Packet Page 74 of 225
VIII. WASHINGTON STATE FERRIES
Edmonds/Kingston Ferry Route Partnership Meeting – Reservation System Pre-
Design Study
Overview
The Edmonds/Kingston ferry route has been selected by Washington State Ferries (WSF) to
study the possibility of establishing a vehicle reservation pilot program. Edmonds/Kingston
was selected because it met certain selection criteria, including technical capability, diverse
customer/ridership base, customer benefit, and community traffic concerns. The Washington
State Legislature asked WSF to conduct a feasibility study for the reservation system and to
look at how it might be implemented on the Edmonds/Kingston route, if funded by the State
Legislature. This partnership group is part of a larger effort to complete a legislated vehicle
reservations pre-design report due to the Legislature before 2010 session. In response to
the request, WSF formed a community partnership committee composed of 17 individuals
from both sides of the route representing varied interests including business and tourism;
counties, cities and ports; commuters and weekend vehicle travelers; Ferry Advisory
Committees and regional planning organizations. WSF is consulting with community partners
on how to adapt a vehicle reservations system to the specific characteristics of the
Edmonds/Kingston route. The community partnership group is meeting at least once each
month during the development of the pre-design report. The meetings are open to the
public and held in Edmonds and Kingston on an alternating basis.
For more information on the pre-design study, materials from the partnership meetings, and
upcoming meetings, visit http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/Ferries/Planning/VehicleReservations
Significant Activities Since July 23, 2009
August 19, 2009 – The second meeting of the Edmonds/Kingston community
partnership took place at the Kingston Community Center. The agenda included
business rules, group discussion, brainstorming and exploring concepts, and next
steps.
September 9, 2009 – The third meeting of the Edmonds/Kingston community
partnership took place in the Brackett Meeting Room at Edmonds City Hall. The
agenda included business rules, goals and evaluation criteria, reservation system
overarching concepts, and next steps.
September 30, 2009 – The fourth meeting of the Edmonds/Kingston community
partnership took place in the Kingston Community Center. The agenda included a
review of progress to date, e.g., business rules, information technology back office
needs, key factors for success. Additional items discussed included general vehicle
processing, terminal constraints, challenges and options, and next steps.
5
Packet Page 75 of 225
October 14, 2009 – The fifth meeting of the Partnership was held in the Brackett
Meeting Room at Edmonds City Hall. The agenda included draft emerging program
rules, and general customer and priority account holders.
Note: Additional meetings will be held on October 28, 2009 in Edmonds (Senior Center),
November 12, 2009 in Edmonds (City Hall Brackett Room) and December 2, 2009 in
Kingston (Community Center).
VIII. CITY OF EDMONDS / COMCAST FRANCHISE AGREEMENT
Overview
On July 14, 2008, the City of Edmonds received a letter dated October 22, 2008 from Stan
Finley, Comcast Director of Franchising and Government Affairs (Exhibit 2) regarding renewal
of the existing franchise agreement. While Comcast is asking to reach a mutually
satisfactorily agreement through an informal negotiation process pursuant to Section 626 of
the 1984 Cable Act, the second paragraph of the Comcast letter also states “to preserve our
statutory rights to this formal procedure, this letter is our official notice to you invoking that
provision.”
With a record of successfully negotiating Verizon franchise agreements, several members of
the North Puget Sound Consortium wish to form a new Consortium for the purposes of
negotiating franchise agreements with Comcast. Jurisdictions which have been invited to
participate include: Snohomish County, the Cities of Bothell, Carnation, Edmonds, Kenmore,
Lake Forest Park, Mercer Island, Shoreline, Woodinville, and the Town of Woodway.
Benefits of a coordinated effort include: ensuring that the public receives the maximum
rights and benefits from their respective franchise agreements; better coordination of
negotiations with Comcast; sharing the costs of negotiations including hiring a national
consultant and attorneys to assure the citizens of each jurisdiction that their franchise is
competitive, both locally and nationally; and creating a common template and negotiation
strategy through the assistance of a national consultant and attorneys to maximize leverage
during the negotiations.
Significant Activities Since July 23, 2009
July, August, September and October, 2009 – The North Puget Sound Consortium
representatives continue to work on a draft franchise agreement template.
IX. FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS ACQUISITION OF VERIZON
Overview
On May 13, 2009, Verizon announced plans to divest its local wireline communications
system to Frontier Communications. According to a May 19, 2009 letter to the City of
Edmonds from both entities, the transaction includes Verizon’s residential and small business
telephone lines, internet service, long-distance voice accounts, as well as Verizon’s fiber-to-
the-premises (FTTP) assets; Frontier will continue to provide video services after the
completion of the merger.
6
Packet Page 76 of 225
Similar to the process used to negotiate the Verizon and Comcast Interlocal Agreements,
participating entities (Consortium) to an Interlocal Agreement have jointly contracted with
River Oaks Communications and Ogden Murphy Wallace for common services as well as a
mechanism for each entity to utilize the consultant’s services, as that entity sees fit, and for
additional support in reviewing or negotiating the transfer to meet specific needs of each
participating entity.
Significant Activities Since July 23, 2009
July, August, September and October, 2009 – Consortium members, its Consultants, and
the City's Attorney continue to review, and have been meeting to discuss, information
related to the Frontier purchase of Verizon. The Consortium is collectively getting closer
to assessing whether a recommendation from the Consortium can be made to
Consortium Member’s Councils. Consortium members have all signed a Stand-Still
Agreement with Frontier and Verizon which extends the decision date until November
30th, which means that if Verizon provides the Consortium with adequate information,
City and County Councils should meet sometime in November to render a decision on the
proposed transfer.
Note: Verizon has offered to meet with City and County Councils at study sessions to
discuss the transfer. On November 2, 2009, a work session will be held with the
Edmonds City Council to update the Council and to give Frontier and Verizon
representatives an opportunity to answer any questions raised by the City Council. The
City Attorney’s office will also have a representative to help answer questions.
Economic Development
I. PARTNERSHIPS
Goal 1 of the Edmonds Economic Development Plan states: ”foster a healthy business
community that provides employment and other economic opportunities.”
Significant Activities Since July 23, 2009
Economic Development Commission Overview
On June 2, 2009 – The City Council approved Ordinance 3735 which creates a new Citizens
Economic Development Commission (EDC) in order to determine new strategies for
economic development within the City and identify new sources of revenues. In conjunction
with the Planning Board, the new commission is to review and consider strategies designed
to improve commercial viability, tourism development, and activity.
The ED Commission consists of 17 members appointed by Mayor Gary Haakenson and the
City Council. The commission is staffed by the City’s Economic Development Director. The
Commission will make recommendations to the Mayor and City Council, as well as to other
City boards or commissions as appropriate, regarding economic development strategies. The
commission will provide an annual report to the Council in December of every year. The
commission is scheduled to end on December 31, 2010. Minutes from monthly meetings
7
Packet Page 77 of 225
(once approved by the Edmonds EDC) can be found at
http://www.ci.edmonds.wa.us/EconDevMinutes.stm.
August 13, 2009 – The Commission conducted its second public meeting in the City Hall
Brackett Room. Agenda items included goal development as it relates to the City’s
Comprehensive Plan, mission and vision statement, meeting with the City’s Planning
Board, and future presentations.
September 16, 2009 – The Commission conducted its third public meeting in the City Hall
Brackett Room. Agenda items included Resolution 1198 mission and goal development
as they relate to the adopted City’s Comprehensive Plan, October 28, 2009 meeting with
the City’s Planning Board, and future presentations.
October 21, 2009 – The Commission conducted its fourth public meeting in the City Hall
Brackett Room. Agenda items included preliminary discussions from Sub Groups 1, 2
and 3, presentation on findings from previous EDC committee reports, October 28, 2009
joint meeting with Planning Board, December 2009 City Council Meeting, and joint report
from Economic Development Commission and Planning Board.
Note: On October 28, 2009, the Edmonds EDC and the Planning Board will conduct a
joint meeting in the City Hall Brackett Room beginning at 6 p.m. Notices have been
posted on Channel 21 and the City’s website.
Goal 1, Policy 1f of the Edmonds Economic Development Plan states: ”Continue to partner
with business and economic development organizations, and address feedback from the
business community.”
Significant Activities Since July 23, 2009
July, August, September and October, 2009 – See Sections II and III.
II. BUSINESS EXPANSION, RETENTION, AND DIVERSIFICATION OF TAX
BASE
Goal 1, Policy 1c of the Edmonds Economic Development Plan states: “Encourage and
expand business expansion and retention programs. Goal 3 calls for diversifying the tax base
and increasing revenues to support local services.”
Significant Activities Since July 23, 2009
July, August, September and October, 2009 – I continue working with property and
business owners in attempts to help find leaseable space and relocate existing
businesses, in addition to discussing potential leasing and redevelopment of buildings
and land.
Fall of 2009 – The Chamber of Commerce is conducting business education
seminars/classes over a 13-week period, beginning in September, 2009.
III. IMPROVING BUSINESS CLIMATE
8
Packet Page 78 of 225
Goal 2, Policy 2e of the Edmonds Economic Development Plan states: “explore options such
as Business Improvement Districts/Areas (special assessment districts) as a way to help
shopping areas fund marketing and beautification in a sustainable fashion.
Significant Activities Since July 23, 2009
July, August, September and October, 2009 – Representatives from the City of Edmonds
and Greater Edmonds Chamber of Commerce continued to meet and discuss the
possibility of establishing a Downtown Edmonds Business Improvement Area.
Goal 2, Policy 2h of the Edmonds Economic Development Plan states: “Work to identify and
“brand” distinct business districts, where there is a natural synergy, such as the Highway 99
International District, the Stevens Hospital Medical Corridor, and the 4th Avenue Arts
Corridor.”
Significant Activities Since July 23, 2009
July, August, September and October 2009 – Highway 99 Enhancement Project - includes
adding street lighting fixtures and artwork along the portion of Highway 99 passing
through the International District. Light fixtures have been delivered to the City of
Edmonds. City staff is in the process of working with a contractor to prepare bid
documents necessary to solicit bids, and contract for installation oversight.
July, August, September and October 2009 – Frances Chapin continues to work on
wayfinding signage opportunities including kiosks and locator signs. Additionally, public
parking signs, utilizing the universal parking symbol, have been installed at various
locations within the downtown area to direct visitors to public parking areas.
IV. TECHNOLOGY
Goal 3, Policy 3b of the Edmonds Economic Development Plan states: “Leverage technology
assets, such as existing fiber connections, to pursue new revenue streams.”
Significant Activities Since July 23, 2009
July, August, September and October, 2009 – The Economic Development and Community
Services staff continue to meet with the City’s Community Technology Advisory
Committee regarding existing technology assets, e.g., fiber and communications
equipment.
V. TOURISM
Goal 3, Policy 3g of the Edmonds Economic Development Plan states: “Expand tourism efforts to
take advantage of regional trends, such as nature tourism.”
Significant Activities Since July 23, 2009
July, August, September and October, 2009 – Cindi Cruz has been working on updating
the City’s “Rack Brochure” for distribution in 2010. The brochure, which is tourism
related, will be distributed throughout Western Washington, e.g., hotels, Edmonds Log
9
Packet Page 79 of 225
July, August, September and October, 2009 – Over the past several months, City staff
have been updating a variety of City website web pages in an attempt to provide more
effective and useful information to website visitors. Although the City does not employ a
Webmaster, the City does utilize the services of a contractor to assist with website
maintenance. As such, the responsibility for updating web pages and formatting rest
with existing City staff. Website development is ever evolving and is a product of
numerous contributions by individuals throughout the City and increasing the
accessibility of information contained within the City’s website is a primary goal of City
Administration. City staff continue to update the City’s website. Economic Department
staff are also updating Visiting Edmonds webpages to improve information for visitors.
This also ties to Goal 3, Policy 3B.
Items of Interest
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA)
Significant Activities Since July 23, 2009
City’s capital maintenance overlay program
In March of this year 2009, the City of Edmonds was successful in securing $1M of
federal stimulus money for the City’s capital maintenance overlay program. The overlay
project is anticipated to begin in late summer 2009. A total of $14.9M of federal stimulus
funding for transportation improvements was distributed to Snohomish County agencies
in March. The regional selection criteria were based on project readiness and how
quickly the projects could begin construction. This funding will provide a much-needed
temporary financial resource for the overlay program. It’s important to note that the
stimulus funds will not contribute toward balancing the City’s general fund. Due to lack
of revenue, the City currently has no funds budgeted in 2009 and 2010 for the citywide
overlay program.
o September and October, 2009 – The City of Edmonds is installing new curb ramps
and street overlays along portions of Dayton Street, 212th Street and 220th Street
using federal stimulus funding.
Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant (EECBG)
In March of this year, Energy Secretary Steven Chu announced plans to invest $3.2
billion in energy efficiency and conservation projects in U.S. cities, counties, states,
territories, and Native American tribes. The Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block
Grant (EECBG) program, funded by President Obama’s American Recovery and
Reinvestment Act, will provide formula grants for projects that reduce total energy use
and fossil fuel emissions, and improve energy efficiency nationwide. The City of
Edmonds received notification that it is eligible for a $160,200 block grant under the
EECBG program. The City has until June 25, 2009 to submit an application, i.e., "claim"
the grant amount, and 18 months to obligate and three years to expend the funds. This
10
Packet Page 80 of 225
is an entitlement grant for cities over 35,000 in population, rather than a competitive
grant.
City staff conducted several meetings to discuss possible projects or programs that
might be eligible for this type of funding and have developed a preliminary list; these
projects are considered short term. City staff also participated in a DOE webcast to
learn about application submittal procedures and how the funds can be used.
In addition to the above, I contacted other entities such as the Port of Edmonds, Puget
Sound Energy, Snohomish County PUD, Edmonds School District and Stevens Hospital,
to find out whether they might have projects which are small in scale but could be
included in our grant application under a partnership proposal. We are not looking to
expend the grant money on a single project, and we have already identified more than
enough City of Edmonds projects to expend all of the grant money (several times over).
I requested representatives from these entities to share whether they have a project
that (1) would have benefits for the entire community, (2) could be small enough in
terms of cost to fit within an overall multi-project application, and (3) would have
measurable, identifiable results. Examples of projects we are considering include energy-
efficient equipment retrofits, vehicle replacement, traffic signal timing, energy code
training and information programs, and software that can turn off electronic equipment
during late night non-working hours. The second reason I contact these entities is to
explore opportunities for partnering on projects that may go beyond the funding
available in this first round of block grants. US-DOE has indicated that there will be a
"competitive round" of grants available, although details have not been established. We
believe that grant applications emphasizing partnering on a community or regional level
will be what DOE is looking for, especially those that have long-term effects and can
serve as "demonstration projects" for others to access. Announcement of the EECBG
opportunity was shared with, and a proposed project list was also reviewed by, the
Mayor’s Climate Protection Committee.
o September 22, 2009 – The City was notified that the Department of Energy has awarded
an Energy Efficiency Conservation Block Grant to the City of Edmonds. The award is
the full amount referenced in the March 2009 eligibility announcement ($160,200).
The funds will be used for the following six different projects. Announcement of the
EECBG opportunity was shared with, and the attached proposed project list was also
reviewed by, the Mayor’s Climate Protection Committee.
Project 1 - PC Energy Management (federal funds)
Purchase and install energy management software for City computers (PC's).
Enables automatic shut-down and management of upgrades. The cost covered
under the grant is for the purchase of the software and licenses to cover
computer workstations throughout City government, linked by network at several
building sites.
Project 2 - Network Server Energy Upgrades – (federal funds)
Purchase and install energy-efficient PC network servers, replacing old servers
still in use. Estimated project cost should enable four (4) servers to be replaced.
11
Packet Page 81 of 225
Project 3 - Residential & Commercial Energy Meters (federal and local non-federal
funds)
Purchase energy meters to support residential and commercial energy
monitoring, partnering with ongoing programs operated by local utilities.
Establish public information plan, coordinated with the utilities, which provides
educational resources and web-based support. The meters would be available for
loan to private citizens or businesses to help monitor and assess energy needs,
encouraging conservation and energy reduction.
This program will consist of two components: (1) the purchase of home energy
meters for loan to residential households and businesses within the city, and (2)
website development to promote the meter program and enable homeowners to
log their experiences and energy savings, and to encourage others to participate
and ultimately save energy.
Two types of meters will be purchased, which can be loaned out as a “set.” One
meter will be similar to a simple plug-in meter (e.g. the P3 International Kill A
Watt EZ Electricity Usage Monitor) which allows monitoring of appliance energy
consumption. The second type of meter (e.g. PowerCost Home Electricity
Monitor) is a unit that will interface with the home electric utility meter, allowing
monitoring of overall electrical energy used in the home. In tandem, these will
allow homeowners to monitor and potentially reduce overall energy usage. The
meters will be loaned out free of charge, for a defined time period, with
information on usage and savings to be reported as feedback to help assess the
benefits of the program.
The second part of the program is an enhancement to the City’s website to
promote and provide for online reporting and feedback on the effectiveness of
the program. Privacy will be afforded users, but reporting will be required of
residents choosing to participate in the program so as to provide some
measurement of effectiveness.
Project 4 - Heating System Design and Feasibility Study (federal funds)
A consultant will be hired to perform an analysis and feasibility study to replace
the Frances Anderson Cultural Center (a heavily used community center) steam
boiler heating system with ground source heat pumps or an alternative energy-
efficient heating source. The existing system is old and highly inefficient.
However, because of the size and complexity of the building and its systems, the
City needs to conduct an assessment and feasibility study to evaluate different
energy-efficient alternatives before considering replacement of the existing
system.
Project 5 - Purchase Hybrid Vehicles – (federal and local non-federal funds)
12
Packet Page 82 of 225
The City would purchase up to seven (7) hybrid vehicles to replace existing low-
efficiency City vehicles. EECBG funds can only be used to fund the delta between
the cost of a hybrid vehicle (or Alternative Fuel Vehicle – AFV) and the cost of a
non-hybrid vehicle (or non-AFV). Existing mid-size cars and trucks/pickups would
be replaced with small hybrid cars and hybrid utility vehicles (SUV’s). The
average fuel efficiency of the existing vehicles ranges from 8 to 22 MPG while the
new hybrid replacements provide between 32 and 50 MPG.
When purchasing vehicles, the City uses Washington State contracting
procedures and contract listing prices. According to the State of Washington
Current Contract Information, there are two types of small sedan AFV vehicles
available and one small SUV AFV vehicle available for purchase using this
process.
Note: It is possible that the City may consider the purchase of an electric police
scooter and/or other electric sedan(s) in lieu of one or more of the hybrid
vehicles identified above as technology and availability improves. This is
dependant on availability and pricing within the required 3-year expenditure
window.
Project 6 - Low-Energy Lighting Retrofit – (federal funds)
Existing exterior lighting of the outdoor work yard at the Public Works facility is
provided by traditional, inefficient 150-watt high pressure sodium fixtures. Based
on discussions with the electrical utility provider (Snohomish PUD), the City has
determined that energy and cost savings are possible if the existing lights are
replaced with low-energy lumen-equivalent lights, such as LED fixtures. This
project would complement ongoing City efforts to replace existing lighting
fixtures with more energy efficient lights.
Note: Representative Inslee's office called to congratulate the City on its success in
securing the grant. They want to highlight the City of Edmonds in D.C. as an entity
that is looking to spend the funds in a variety of ways instead of on one project or
purchase, and how the City is working towards long term sustainability.
Burlington Northern Santa Fe – Installation of Second Rail Line
As a part of the Sound Transit’s Sound Move, Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) will
be installing a second rail line alongside the existing rail line between the areas north of
Downtown Edmonds and south of Marina Beach Park. During a meeting with Sound
Transit earlier this year, BNSF presented a plan depicting what BNSF believes to be the
final alignment and realignment of the second and existing rail lines respectively. The
plan depicts Port of Edmonds and City of Edmonds leased areas in addition to what
portions of the leased areas BNSF intends to take back from both entities as a result of
the above mentioned activities. Upon reviewing the plan, City staff requested that BNSF
survey and stake/mark in the field where the fencing (west side of tracks) is to be
located. The City and Port of Edmonds submitted this request in order to begin assessing
future impacts, and planning for post installation/realignment of the rail lines.
13
Packet Page 83 of 225
14
As expressed on a number of occasions to BNSF, the City and Port are concerned about
potential impacts related to realignment and installation of BNSF rail lines. We are
equally concerned about the amount of time the City and Port may have to react to any
decision(s) made by BNSF and the potential financial impacts to our budgets. Depending
on the magnitude of BNSF construction related impacts, the City and Port of Edmonds
may not have the staffing and financial resources to mitigate the impacts. The City has
asked BNSF if they have a mitigation fund set aside to mitigate adverse impacts, if any?
To date, we have not heard back from BNSF.
Based on BNSF engineering plans and field stakes, there could be negative impacts to
Admiral Way and Marina Beach Park. The City is in the process of securing an
engineering firm in order to fully determine the impact and possibly design a new
Admiral Way alignment, if necessary, that will maintain access to Marina Beach Park,
Port of Edmonds and existing parking areas. The City is attempting to get out in front of
this issue before any work is performed by BNSF.
Community Transit SWIFT Project
Significant Activities Since July 23, 2009
o July, August, September and October, 2009 – Work continues on three Edmonds
Community Transit SWIFT stations. Swift is scheduled to begin operation in
November, 2009.
Packet Page 84 of 225
AM-2568 2.F.
Adopting Firdale Village Zoning Criteria and Design Standards
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:10/27/2009
Submitted By:Rob Chave Time:Consent
Department:Planning Type:Action
Review Committee:
Committee Action:
Information
Subject Title
Adoption of an Ordinance amending the Edmonds Community Development Code to add a new
Chapter 16.100 Firdale Village Mixed-Use Zoning Criteria, and a new Chapter 22.100 Firdale
Village Site Design Standards.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Approve the draft ordinance (Exhibit 1).
Previous Council Action
Council approved the draft Firdale Village mixed use zoning criteria and design standards on
October 6, 2009.
Narrative
On October 6, 2009, the City Council held a continued public hearing on the Planning Board
recommendation to approve the creation of a new mixed use zoning classification for Firdale
Village to implement the Comprehensive Plan (see Council minutes, Exhibit 2). The City Attorney
has drafted an ordinance which would implement the Council's action to approve the new zoning
classification and design standards (see Exhibit 1).
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: Exhibit 1: Draft Ordinance
Link: Exhibit 2: City Council Minutes 10/6/2009
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 10/22/2009 03:56 PM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 10/22/2009 04:06 PM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 10/22/2009 04:07 PM APRV
Form Started By: Rob
Chave
Started On: 10/22/2009 03:35
PM
Final Approval Date: 10/22/2009
Packet Page 85 of 225
{WSS745071.DOC;1\00006.900000\ } - 1 -
0006.90000
WSS/gjz
10/9/09
ORDINANCE NO. _______
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE EDMONDS COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT CODE TO ADD A NEW CHAPTER 16.100
FIRDALE VILLAGE MIXED-USE ZONING CRITERIA, A
NEW CHAPTER 22.100 FIRDALE VILLAGE SITE DESIGN
STANDARDS, AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME
SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE.
WHEREAS, this matter came to the City Council on the application of A.D.
Shapiro Architects, AMD-2008-10, with the recommendation of its Planning Board, and
WHEREAS, public hearings were held before the City Council on July 21 and
October 6, 2009, and
WHEREAS, the proposal originally included a commitment to preserve a stand of
native growth trees along the northern boundary of the site for which the zone was created as it
abuts adjacent residentially zoned property, and
WHEREAS, due to concerns regarding the ability of the City to impose such
requirements under existing Washington case law, a twenty-foot setback has been substituted
based upon the commitment of the applicant to bring back a development agreement confirming
the dedication of a native growth protection easement in conjunction with a future application for
a site specific rezone of the site for which this zone has been created, and
WHEREAS, the City Council deems the proposal to be in the public interest
based in part upon the representations of the applicant that a development agreement will be
forthcoming, and
Packet Page 86 of 225
{WSS745071.DOC;1\00006.900000\ } - 2 -
WHEREAS, the City Council reserves the right to repeal this zone if a site
specific rezone is not instituted within a reasonable time in conjunction with a development
agreement to preserve the stand of native growth trees, NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Edmonds Community Development Code is hereby amended by
the addition of a new chapter 16.100 Firdale Village Mixed Use Zoning Criteria to read as
follows:
Firdale Village
Mixed Use Zoning Criteria
September 30, 2009
16.100.000 Introduction
16.100.010 Purposes
16.100.020 Sub-Districts
16.100.030 Uses
16.100.040 Site Development Standards
16.100.000 Introduction
General Intent and Project Vision
The design vision for Firdale Village is to create a vibrant
neighborhood village form of development that strikes a balance
between commercial, retail and residential uses and contributes to
the vitality of the neighborhood and area. The project is intended
to support a variety of commercial and retail uses along with multi-
family residential in an environment that is accessible to the
pedestrian, visitor, tenant, motorist and public transit user.
16.100.010 Purposes
The Firdale Village Mixed-Use zone has the following specific
purposes in addition to the general purposes for business and
commercial zones in
Chapter 16.40 ECDC.
A. To reserve and regulate areas for a ‘neighborhood center’
Packet Page 87 of 225
{WSS745071.DOC;1\00006.900000\ } - 3 -
type of mixed-use development that includes a mix of commercial
and multi-residential housing types, and a range of greater
densities than are available in the single family residential zone;
B. To promote a mix of residential, commercial and other uses
in a manner that is consistent with the City’s comprehensive plan,
(i.e.: 25% of heated floor area shall be “commercial” space).
C. To provide for those additional uses which complement and
are compatible with multiple residential uses.
D. The Codes contained within this Chapter are to be used in
conjunction with the Firdale Village Design Standards in Chapter
22.100.000 ECDC.
16.100.020 Sub-Districts
See Figure B for location of Districts on the site.
A. District 1 – Commercial: The primarily commercial uses
will be located in this district, which is located closer to Firdale
Avenue and oriented to the street. The flexibility for each is
written into the table, but not called out in the “mini-description”.
B. District 2 – Commercial/Multi-Family Residential: Multi-
family residential uses will be located more towards sides and rear
of the site, behind the commercial uses, with possible commercial
functions on the ground level.
16.100.030 Uses
A. Table 16.100.030-1
Permitted Uses
Dist 1
Com-
mercial
Dist 2
Multi-
Family
Residential Uses
Single-family dwelling X X
Multiple dwelling unit(s) X A
Housing for low-income elderly and
senior housing X A
Packet Page 88 of 225
{WSS745071.DOC;1\00006.900000\ } - 4 -
Commercial Uses
Retail stores or sales A A
Offices, (2nd floor or higher than retail
space in the same building) A A
Service uses including professional
service offices, health clinics A A
Retail uses include grocery stores,
pharmacy/ drug stores and bookstores. A E
Retail sales requiring intensive outdoor
display or storage areas, such as trailer
sales, used car lots (except as part of a
new car sales and service dealer), and
heavy equipment storage, sales or services X X
Restaurants (excluding drive-through) A A
Dist 1
Com
Dist 2
MF
Pubs, taverns or bars A X
Enclosed fabrication or assembly areas
associated with and on the same property
as an art studio, art gallery, shoe repair,
restaurant or food service establishment
that also provides an on-site retail outlet
open to the public A E
Automobile sales and service X X
Dry cleaning and laundry plants which
use only nonflammable and non-explosive
cleaning agents C E
Printing, publishing and binding
establishments C C
Packet Page 89 of 225
{WSS745071.DOC;1\00006.900000\ } - 5 -
Community-oriented open air markets
conducted as an outdoor operation and
licensed pursuant to provisions in the
Edmonds City Code A A
Bus stop shelters A X
Churches, subject to the requirements of
ECDC 17.100.020 A E
Local public facilities subject to the
requirements of ECDC 17.100.050 C C
Off-street parking and loading areas to
serve a permitted use B B
Commuter parking lots in conjunction
with a facility otherwise permitted in this
zone B B
Commercial parking lots A C
Wholesale uses X X
Hotels and motels A A
Amusement establishments C X
Auction businesses, excluding vehicle or
livestock auctions X X
Drive-in businesses X X
Laboratories X X
Fabrication of light industrial products not
otherwise listed as a permitted use X X
Day-care centers C C
Museums and art galleries of primarily
local concern that do not meet the criteria A E
Packet Page 90 of 225
{WSS745071.DOC;1\00006.900000\ } - 6 -
for regional public facilities as defined in
ECDC 21.85.033
Dist 1
Com
Dist 2
MJ
Retail stores larger than 12,000 GSF X X
Residential treatment facilities for
alcoholics and drug abusers X X
Light Industrial X X
Outdoor storage, incidental to a permitted
use D D
A = Permitted primary use
B = Permitted secondary use
C = Primary uses requiring a conditional use permit
D = Secondary uses requiring a conditional use permit
E = Permitted primary use on ground level floor only
X = Not permitted
16.100.040 Site Development Standards
A. Development Standards – General
Development Requirements can be summarized as follows: A
minimum of 25% of the heated space of the overall development
shall be in commercial and/or retail space usage. See District Map
figure B
B. Building Scale and Building Height
1. Intent: In order to provide a consistency of architectural
scale for different sections of the development:
The more commercial/retail area closer to Firdale Avenue shall be
lower in scale than the multi-family buildings oriented to the rear
of the site.
Building Height:
Packet Page 91 of 225
{WSS745071.DOC;1\00006.900000\ } - 7 -
a. District 1: Commercial/Office/Retail:
One (1) – three (3) stories, (lowest floor to be 12’ flr. to flr. min.),
Minimum height: 20 feet; Maximum height 39 feet. Commercial
and Office are not permitted on the ground level floor of the
building.
b. District 2: Multi-family Residential:
Maximum -- 39 feet provided that an additional story may be
permitted to a maximum height of 48 feet in accordance with
subparagraph b.(1) below. Maximum height: 48 feet base height,
for four stories, with possibility of an additional 4 feet, (to allow
for variation in rooflines, for a maximum bldg. height of 52’. Elev.
Shaft enclosures can exceed this height only to meet bldg code.
Guard railings required by and compliant with the State Building
Code on roof decks can exceed the maximum roof height. – See
subparagraph b(2) below)
(1) A fourth story to a maximum height of 48 feet may be
allowed in District 2, for multi-family uses, if the project integrates
green design methods and technologies throughout the project.
The project must achieve at least a 4-star level of the Built Green
of Washington program or a LEED gold certification, or
equivalent. See also ECDC Design Standards 22.100.090.
(2) Building height may extend four feet above the maximum
39 or 48 foot height limit as applicable if all portions of the
building above the stated height are modulated in design, or are
designed as a hip, gable, arch, shed or other similar forms.
Vertical parapet walls are not allowed to protrude above the 39 or
48 foot height limit unless they are part of an approved modulated
design. For examples of permissible forms, see figures C1, C2, C3,
C3, and C4.
(3) Ground floor residential in District 2 shall be higher than
the public sidewalk/way by a minimum of 3’, or accessed through
a residential courtyard to segregate it from the public way.
3. Elevator shaft and/or /Stairway penthouse shafts may
extend above the maximum building height by 5 feet, when
compliant with building code criteria.
4. Mechanical equipment may extend above this base building
height a maximum of five feet (5’).
Packet Page 92 of 225
{WSS745071.DOC;1\00006.900000\ } - 8 -
C. Parking Standards
1. Minimum Spaces Required
a. Commercial including office, retail and restaurant uses:
Minimum: Provide one space for every 400 SF. Twenty five
percent (25%), of parking places designated for office space must
also be shared with multi-family residential uses, and shall be
easily accessible to multi-family residential units.
b. Multi-Family Uses: Minimum: Provide 1.5 spaces per unit.
Additional parking for residential units shall be provided in a
shared parking area for office/commercial and residential.
c. For Guest parking, provide 1 space for every ten (10) units
or 0.10 spaces for every unit as a minimum.
2. For shared parking arrangements, a binding covenant in
readable format describing terms of the shared parking
arrangement shall be required between the property management
companies/owners of the residential and commercial uses
describing the joint use of the parking areas, and shall be approved
as to form by the City Attorney.
D. Site Setbacks
See Diagram 16.100.040 D-1 below for illustration of setbacks,
buffers and related notes.
Setback distances refer to areas above ground.
Underground structures can be within the setback area as long so
long as adequate soil depth is provided to support the existence of
trees and vegetation, provided however, that no below ground
structure may extend into or under the 20’ setback at the north
property line.
1. Minimum side setbacks are 15 feet.
2. The minimum setback on the northern boundary of the site
is 20 feet. The required setback shall be landscaped and designed
to provide a buffer to adjoining R-zoned property.
3. Where the proposed development abuts a single-family
residential (RS) zoned property, the proposed development shall
also modulate the design of any building facades facing the single-
family residentially (RS) zoned property. See Design Standards
Packet Page 93 of 225
{WSS745071.DOC;1\00006.900000\ } - 9 -
for additional information.
4. SW Corner Setbacks: District 1 shall extend to street
property line with no setback, and setback from the west property
line by 15’. District 2 shall be setback on a per floor basis, with
the second floor setback from the street property line by 30’, and
west property line by 35’. Third floor setback shall be 55’ from the
street property line and 35’ from the west property line. All floors
shall be revert to minimum setback from the west property line of
15’ when 80’ from the street property line and greater.
E. Open Space
1. Design Intent: The project shall include a comprehensive
open space network that uses courtyard(s) and other open space
elements to connect the residential and commercial uses.
2. Open Space Requirements:
Minimum open space requirement for the development: Shall be
20% of the overall site area. The minimum open space
requirement may include setback areas, all developed pedestrian
areas including landscaped walkways, plazas, courtyards and other
passive open spaces in the commercial area. The calculation may
also include public open space for the residential uses. The
calculation shall not include parking areas, driveways, or service
areas.
F. Design Standards
For more descriptive information on Design Standards and
guidelines, please see ECDC Chapter 22.100.
Section 2. The Edmonds Community Development Code is amended to
incorporate a new Chapter 22.100 Firdale Village Site Design Standards in the form and with the
illustrations shown on the attached Exhibit A, incorporated by this reference as fully as if herein
set forth.
Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifi-
cally delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum, and shall take effect
five (5) days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the
Packet Page 94 of 225
{WSS745071.DOC;1\00006.900000\ } - 10 -
title.
APPROVED:
MAYOR GARY HAAKENSON
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED:
CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY:
BY
W. SCOTT SNYDER
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
PUBLISHED:
EFFECTIVE DATE:
ORDINANCE NO.
Packet Page 95 of 225
{WSS745071.DOC;1\00006.900000\ }- 11 -
SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. __________
of the City of Edmonds, Washington
On the ____ day of ___________, 2009, the City Council of the City of Edmonds,
passed Ordinance No. _____________. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting
of the title, provides as follows:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE
EDMONDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE TO ADD A NEW CHAPTER 16.100
FIRDALE VILLAGE MIXED USE ZONING CRITERIA, A NEW CHAPTER 22.100
FIRDALE VILLAGE SITE DESIGN STANDARDS, AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE
SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE.
The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request.
DATED this _____ day of ________________, 2009.
CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE
Packet Page 96 of 225
Firdale Village Site -- Design Standards -- 1
A.D. Shapiro Architects, PS
Exhibit A
Firdale Village Site
Design Standards
Index
22.100.000 Applicability and Goals
22.100.010 Site Design and Planning
22.100.020 Architectural Design
22.100.030 Pedestrian Orientation, Outdoor Spaces & Amenities
22.100.040 Vehicular Access and Parking
22.100.050 Site Landscaping & Screening Elements
22.100.060 Signage
22.100.070 Site Lighting
22.100.080 Safety Issues
22.100.090 Sustainable Design
Aerial view of existing Firdale Village site.
Packet Page 97 of 225
Firdale Village Site -- Design Standards -- 2
A.D. Shapiro Architects, PS
22.100.000 Applicability and Goals
A. Applicability
The design standards in this chapter apply to all development within the
Firdale Village MU zone, including the sub-districts contained within the larger
zone.
The Design Standards use imperative language such as “shall” and “must” to
indicate high priority features and a strong directive toward satisfying the
‘Standards’ intent. Words such as “should” and “may” indicate desirable
conditions or elements that are strongly encouraged.
B . Goals and Intent
The Design Standards will help to shape a neighborhood village form of
development, a place of complementary uses within an aesthetically attractive,
easily accessible and economically healthy environment. The guidelines and
standards will be used to create an attractive, inviting environment for residential
and commercial uses, with an emphasis on the needs of the pedestrian, including
the needs of senior citizens, youths and physically challenged persons, but that is
also accessible for vehicles.
Development shall be located to facilitate transit and non-motorized travel
modes. On-site facilities that are convenient and attractive to pedestrians,
bicyclists and vehicles are encouraged. The development will be designed to
include the following uses, and will also evolve and change over time:
Retail shops and stores, professional offices, restaurants, services, multi-
residential and community related outdoor areas and facilities.
C. Project Vision
1. Scale and Form -- The vision for Firdale Village is the creation of a
vibrant neighborhood village development that demonstrates a balance between
commercial, retail and residential uses and contributes to the vitality of the
neighborhood and area. The project is intended to create an environment that is
accessible and inviting to the pedestrian, visitor, tenant, motorist and public
transit user. The project can also be an important example of a more sustainable
form of development, one that incorporates sustainable design strategies and
methods in many aspects of the project, from site design, construction to long
term water and energy efficiency. New development shall include pedestrian
amenities that bring residents and customers to the development, including local
shopping, services, offices, specialty retail, restaurants, and other related uses.
Outdoor spaces shall function as social settings for a variety of experiences, while
maintaining a human scale and ability for easy pedestrian circulation.
Packet Page 98 of 225
Firdale Village Site -- Design Standards -- 3
A.D. Shapiro Architects, PS
22.100 .010 Site Design and Planning
A. Intent
1. The project design shall respond to special opportunities and
constraints of the site, including solar orientation, changes in topography,
preservation of existing trees as buffer, and opportunities for low impact site
design.
2. The project design shall take advantage of the southern solar
orientation for multi-family residential orientation and outdoor courtyards as well
as designing adequate usable open space and landscaped areas in both private
residential and commercial sub-districts. The project should also respond to
other local climatic and ecological context by incorporating the site’s natural
systems including significant trees, hydrology and geology into design solutions.
3. In general, the designer shall consider the site design as a whole in
helping to create an inviting environment for residents, tenants and visitors. In
order to clarify possibilities for sustainable design, goals for sustainability and
green technologies shall be set in the initial stages of project design.
B. Site Features
1. Pedestrian Orientation.
The project shall include a pedestrian orientation with public amenities, such as
buildings with ground floor orientation to the streetscape and public spaces,
pedestrian walkways, street trees, attractive landscaping, outdoor areas with
seating and other amenities, and places for gathering. Additional amenities in
public spaces such as fountains, sculpture or other forms of art are highly
encouraged. (See Pedestrian Orientation section for more description).
The use of materials, color, texture, form and massing, proportion, public
amenities, landscaping and vegetation along with mitigation of environmental
impacts, shall be incorporated in the design of the project with the purpose of
supporting a human scale, pedestrian-oriented development.
Packet Page 99 of 225
Firdale Village Site -- Design Standards -- 4
A.D. Shapiro Architects, PS
2. Tree Retention -- The project site plan shall retain the existing stand of
evergreen trees at the north end of the site, to help serve as a buffer between the
new buildings and the residential parcels bordering the project.
Illustration depicting existing large trees on the site
that act as buffer on north boundary of the site.
C. Open Space – Design Intent:
The project shall include a comprehensive open space network that uses
courtyards and other open space elements to connect the residential and
commercial uses.
1. The design and layout of required plazas, courtyards and other public
gathering spaces shall contribute to the overall sense of place and help attract
pedestrian users to the development.
The project shall be designed in such a way to allow some views into the public
plazas and open space from Firdale Avenue, to help create an inviting and
welcoming ambiance from outside the development. It is important to achieve a
balance between creating inviting, usable public spaces and buffering noise and
Large storefront windows,
overhead metal canopy , lush
landscaping and attention to
detail help to create a strong
pedestrian orientation.
Packet Page 100 of 225
Firdale Village Site -- Design Standards -- 5
A.D. Shapiro Architects, PS
other traffic issues from Firdale Avenue. A more transparent configuration, that
allows views from the street into the development, will also help create an
inviting ambiance and make visible the pedestrian friendly character of the
development
2. Open Space Requirements:
Minimum open space requirement for the development: 20% of total site area.
The minimum open space requirement may include all developed pedestrian
areas including landscaped walkways, existing setback landscaping, plazas,
courtyards and other passive open spaces in the commercial area. The
calculation may also include open space for the residential uses. The calculation
shall not include parking areas, driveways, or service areas.
3.. Residential Open Space:
Residential Development shall include private open space or outdoor areas for
residents. These areas shall be configured and designed so as to ensure privacy
for residential uses while also providing linkages to the public open space
components of the project. Seating areas shall be provided as an important part
of the usable open spaces, and coordinated with landscaping, shaded areas,
lighting and orientation to focal points.
22.100 .020 Architectural Design
A. Design Intent
To create a unified design concept for the project that reflects the neighborhood
village form of development, while allowing for some individual expression of
each building. The massing, layout and individual design of each building shall
be compatible with the architectural design of its on site neighboring buildings,
yet complement the neighborhood village character. In general, all aspects of the
project, from landscaped open spaces to project signage should be well-designed
and coordinated with the project as a whole.
1. Scale.
The designers shall consider how the structure and site development
will be viewed from the street and adjacent properties. Scale is not simply the
size of the buildings, it is the proportion of buildings in relationship to each
other, to the street and to the pedestrian environment. Because of the bowl-like
topography, the larger scale buildings will be toward the side and rear of the site,
with lower scale commercial buildings toward Firdale Avenue.
2. Form and Style.
The objectives and standards do not set a particular style of
architecture or design theme. The style and site design shall be pedestrian in scale
and address design features such as distinctive building shapes; incorporation of
a number of design elements on building facades, with particular focus on
ground floor, integration of art; interesting textures and patterns; treatment of
public spaces; landscaping; and signage.
Packet Page 101 of 225
Firdale Village Site -- Design Standards -- 6
A.D. Shapiro Architects, PS
Building forms shall not present visual mass or bulk impacts that are
out of proportion to the adjoining structures, or that appear from the street or
sidewalk as having unmodulated visual mass or bulk. Building additions should
complement the original structure in design
Mixed-use development with variation in scale and height. Variety of retail
facades, along with interesting storefronts creates visual interest at the ground level.
B. Architectural Character
1. Building Siting and Orientation
a. Where feasible, primary commercial buildings shall be oriented to
the street frontage to enliven the street edge as well as to
maximize access from the public sidewalk. Because not all of the
commercial space will be oriented towards Firdale Avenue,
primary entrances may also be oriented to side streets or towards
a rear courtyard as the site design warrants.
b. All visible building frontages and ground floor commercial spaces
shall be detailed with architectural elements.
(See Building Facades, below).
c. Commercial uses are located towards the front of the site, with
orientation towards Firdale Avenue. Residential uses are located
towards the rear of the site to allow for greater privacy and
buffering from street noise and activity.
2. Building Articulation
a. In order to prevent long stretches of monotonous facades,
buildings over 100 feet in length as measured parallel to a
roadway or public open space shall be vertically articulated along
the façade at regular intervals.
b. Articulation may be accomplished in several ways, including:
Modulation – the stepping back of projection of a portion of the
façade, including significant building elements such as balconies,
porches, canopies, entry areas, etc. that visually break up the
façade. Articulation can also be accomplished through adding
Packet Page 102 of 225
Firdale Village Site -- Design Standards -- 7
A.D. Shapiro Architects, PS
building focal points which include distinctive entry features,
changing the roofline and changing materials.
Mixed-Use Building with modulation of façade along with emphasis on development of ground
floor retail uses.
3. Building Facades
a. Objectives.
Building facades should be designed with a variety of
architectural elements that suggest the buildings’ use and provide
visual interest to residents and pedestrians. Special focus shall be
given to mass, scale roof forms and landscaping, with special
attention to the ground floor of retail and commercial buildings.
b. Street-facing and major Façade Elements:
All major mixed-use, commercial and/or retail buildings within
the development shall include decorative light fixtures, and
decorative paving, and at least five (5) of the following elements
on the major facades, with at least five (5) elements on the
ground floor.
(1) Window and doors treatments which embellish the
façade.
(2) Unique façade treatment, such as decorative materials
and design elements.
(3) Recessed entrances.
(4) Balconies.
(5) Railings, grill work, gates
(6) Unique landscaping.
(7) Belt courses.
(8) Decorative tile work.
(9) Projecting metal and glass canopy
(10) Clearstories over storefront windows.
Packet Page 103 of 225
Firdale Village Site -- Design Standards -- 8
A.D. Shapiro Architects, PS
Building façade with emphasis on development of ground
floor – with attention to building entry and other attractive
façade detail including iron grill balconies above.
Packet Page 104 of 225
Firdale Village Site -- Design Standards -- 9
A.D. Shapiro Architects, PS
Use of high quality materials and decorative building details
including exterior lighting and grill work add interest.
Retail façade with emphasis on the ground floor and entry. Architectural detail includes
large windows in storefront, large glass entry door, recessed entry, arched windows above,
contrasting stone outlining entry, structural canopy above entry, large sign integrated into
building façade, hanging blade sign to the left, and landscaped planters in front.
c. Walls
Mixed-use building
with large scale storefront
windows helps to maximize
transparency at ground
level. Metal canopy, use of
durable materials and
lighting adds to visual
interest.
Packet Page 105 of 225
Firdale Village Site -- Design Standards -- 10
A.D. Shapiro Architects, PS
Blank walls without visual or architectural interest shall be
avoided. Buildings shall provide massing breaks along wall
expanses and walls shall include visual or architectural treatments.
Walls facing the sidewalk or other pedestrian spaces should be
treated with recesses, landscaping, windows, seating, recessed
secondary entrances, balconies, belt courses, cornices, and other
means of breaking up the blank wall surface.
d. Ground Floor Windows and Doors
Major commercial buildings should have at least 75 percent of
the length of the ground floor façade between the height of two
feet and seven feet devoted to windows and doors affording
views into retail, office or lobby space.
e. Transparent Facades
Major commercial building facades shall have a high degree of
transparency into the first floor offices/retail to help create a
more inviting ambiance. See section d. above on Ground Floor
Windows and Doors.
Storefront design with
a high degree of
transparency from
walkway or sidewalk.
Packet Page 106 of 225
Firdale Village Site -- Design Standards -- 11
A.D. Shapiro Architects, PS
Building with large storefront windows, overhead canopy and
large street trees
f. Upper Story Facades
Upper stories of buildings above two stories should maintain an
expression line along the façade such as a setback, change of
material, or a projection to reduce the perceived building mass.
Upper-story features shall include but are not limited to
balconies, roof decks, or bay windows.
g. Long Buildings
Long buildings, more than 50 feet in length, shall provide relief to
perceived building mass through such features as varied setback
or heights, or projecting windows, entrances or walls.
Long linear walls should be staggered horizontally and vertically
to provide interest.
h. Entrances
Building entrances should concentrate along the sidewalk and
should be physically and visually inviting. Entrance doors should
be recessed from the façade surface to emphasize the entrance
and provide a sheltered transition to the interior of the building.
Special paving treatments may be used to enhance the entry.
i. Pedestrian walkways
Pedestrian walkways should be a minimum of eight (8) feet wide,
and be landscaped appropriately. Wheelchair ramps shall be
constructed between the sidewalk and building entrances.
j Building Facades Oriented towards Residential Areas.
Building facades facing north towards the single family residential
areas shall be designed to include elements to create an
interesting architectural expression as opposed to blank walls.
Elements shall include those associated with multi-family
residences such as balconies, roof decks, or bay windows, along
with modulation of building facades. .
Packet Page 107 of 225
Firdale Village Site -- Design Standards -- 12
A.D. Shapiro Architects, PS
4. Materials and Color
a. Objectives:
The buildings should include textured high quality materials and
colors and provide a visually interesting experience. Color shall
be carefully considered in relation to the overall project design.
Color and materials should highlight architectural elements such
as doors, windows, fascias, cornices, lintels, sills and pedestrian
amenities.
b. Development and Design Standards:
Building Exteriors: shall be constructed from high quality and
durable materials, that will require minimal maintenance.
Color: A harmonious range of colors shall be used on all
buildings. Bright colors shall be used only for trim and accents.
22.100.030 Pedestrian Orientation, Outdoor Spaces & Amenities
A. Design Intent:
The project should incorporate a network of well designed, attractive
pedestrian spaces throughout the project. The commercial area will feature
various sizes of public spaces, completed with outdoor furnishings and
amenities to help create a safe, inviting environment for visitors and residents.
B. Pedestrian Connections
1. Attractive well-marked pedestrian links between parking and
buildings shall be provided. The connections shall be designed to enhance
pedestrian safety through clearly marked walkways across traffic lanes,
landscaped areas and parking lots.
2. Where walkways cross driveways and traffic lanes, special features
shall be used to increase safety for pedestrians. Potential features include raised
or textured pavement to define the pedestrian space, raised curbs, curb
extensions or low-level lighting such as bollard lights.
3. Pedestrian connections shall be provided between buildings with
special focus on connections between residential and commercial areas.
4. Pedestrian connections shall include design cues to help demarcate
the transition between public and private spaces. Design cues may include a
change in materials, colors, landscaping or the dimensions of the space.
5. Illumination of walkways shall be concentrated along the pedestrian
paths leading to parking areas and in the specific areas where cars are parked.
6. Walkways shall be landscaped where feasible.
7. The project shall include at least one pedestrian pathway through the
parking area(s) to the main entrance from the street.
C. Pedestrian Amenities -- Commercial and public areas:
1. Pedestrian amenities such as street trees, landscaping, and seasonal
flowers, benches, lighting, banners and possibly artwork shall be provided to
Packet Page 108 of 225
Firdale Village Site -- Design Standards -- 13
A.D. Shapiro Architects, PS
create interest along walkways, courtyards and other pedestrian oriented spaces.
Amenities including street trees, planted areas, canopies, wide sidewalks
and street furniture emphasize the pedestrian orientation of the project.
2. All public open spaces, walkways, and sidewalks shall meet ADA
standards.
3. The addition of texture to the ground plane of sidewalks and plazas
with unit pavers, bricks, tiles or public artwork is strongly encouraged.
4. Safe public walkways around and through parking areas shall be
provided as an important part of the site layout and design. (See B1-6 above).
5. Awnings, arcades, pergolas, and/or overhangs shall be provided to
protect pedestrians from inclement weather whenever possible.
6. Pedestrian amenities and detailing of site furniture, lighting, paving,
and site amenities shall be consistent throughout the development to help create
a recognizable identity and image.
7. Separate areas should be provided for active and passive activities.
8. Residential buildings shall provide an easily accessible gathering space
for building occupants and their guests. Examples include an upper level or
roof-top patio area or an at-grade courtyard.
D. Pedestrian Oriented Spaces
1. Mixed-use areas shall emphasize pedestrian orientation by
incorporating features such as plazas, interior walkways, outdoor courtyards,
outdoor seating areas, fountains, outdoor street furniture and other similar
elements.
2. Outdoor Spaces
A variety of outdoor spaces shall be provided, including patios,
courtyards, plazas and other landscaped open spaces, which shall be
proportionate in size to the development.
a. Courtyards:
Packet Page 109 of 225
Firdale Village Site -- Design Standards -- 14
A.D. Shapiro Architects, PS
(1) An outdoor covered or uncovered area easily accessible to
the public at the same level as the public sidewalk or pedestrian
connections which should:
Be at least 8 feet in width, with a building façade on at least
one side; and minimum area of 100 SF.
Be landscaped with groundcover, shrubs, trees or other
landscaping over 25% of its area.
The design should include seating, special paving material,
pedestrian-scale lighting and other pedestrian furnishings;
b. Plazas, Squares and other open spaces
Public plazas and other gathering areas shall be provided to
encourage community activity in open spaces, particularly at the
edges that relate to building openings, natural features, or
activities. Public plazas and gathering areas shall be of sufficient
size to encourage passive gathering activity and permit
permanent/temporary seating and shall incorporate other
elements as described:
(1) There shall be pedestrian linkages leading to and from the
plazas to natural features and other pedestrian paths.
(2) A plaza shall have an articulated edge (buildings, benches,
landscaping, etc.) where feasible to provide visual interest and
additional seating along the edges of the plaza where people may
linger out of the pedestrian traffic flow.
(3) Amenities shall be provided such as seating, lighting, plants,
drinking fountains, distinctive paving, art work, bicycle racks or
structures (either open or covered); and such focal points as a
sculpture or water feature.
a) Plaza Amenities: -- Minimum quantity of amenities for
Plazas shall include four (4) main elements of the following:
(a) Pedestrian oriented seating;
(b) Permanent Landscaping elements including
planting beds, large potted plants and other
landscaping elements that add visual interest;
(c) Outdoor lighting element; (other than walkway
lighting for safety),
(d) Outdoor artwork or sculptures;
(e) Outdoor fountains;
(f) Information kiosks;
(g) Trash Receptacles;
b) Plaza Amenities -- Additional elements that can be
included above the minimum elements listed above:
(a) Decorative clocks,
(b) Special paving patterns/ or tree grates;
(c) Bicycle racks;
(d) Other amenities that meet the intent of providing
high-quality, pedestrian oriented usable space.
Packet Page 110 of 225
Firdale Village Site -- Design Standards -- 15
A.D. Shapiro Architects, PS
(4) Pedestrian furniture for plazas, courtyards, walkways and
other public spaces shall be made of durable, weather-resistant
materials and can be reasonably maintained over an extended
period of time.
(5) The quantity, type, placement and location of amenity
elements shall contribute to a well-balanced mix of features that
provide attractive, inviting, usable outdoor spaces.
(6) Color, form and texture are integral to the overall design of
the plaza. Design of the plaza shall incorporate some soft as well
as hard surface areas (landscaped and special pavement areas).
Courtyard space surrounding fountain with artwork, street furniture, trees and
potted plants.
c. Configuration and Linking of Outdoor Spaces.
Where possible, smaller outdoor spaces, including courtyards and
plazas shall be designed to be adjacent to another outdoor space
to increase the size and usability of outdoor spaces.
Packet Page 111 of 225
Firdale Village Site -- Design Standards -- 16
A.D. Shapiro Architects, PS
Where possible, several outdoor spaces shall be linked to help
create a mini-park or usable outdoor space, complete with
landscaping, planters, pedestrian oriented furnishings and other
amenities. The intention is to provide both usable smaller
outdoor spaces, and larger plazas that can help to provide a
larger, more park-like open space or public square that can be
utilized for outdoor event, gatherings or community type market.
l
Open area between buildings can be designed as usable outdoor space.
Small courtyard outside restaurant, separated from adjacent
open space by a low wall/fountain.
Packet Page 112 of 225
Firdale Village Site -- Design Standards -- 17
A.D. Shapiro Architects, PS
Small courtyard created by Narrow courtyard for dining area recessed area in building. can
be created adjacent to restaurant.
Open space courtyard adjacent to storefronts with fountain, seating stones, artwork and
landscaping.
d. Residential Balconies and Decks
Upper story decks, and balconies as private open space shall also
be incorporated for residential use. Balconies shall be
appropriately scaled and incorporated into the overall design of
the building. The designer shall consider environmental
conditions such as sun, shade, and prevailing winds when
designing outdoor spaces including courtyards, decks, balconies
other usable open spaces.
E. Dedicated Public Meeting Space
The project should provide a public meeting room of not less than 500
SF, with at least one wall with windows to the outside, within the
commercial section of the project. Preferably, the room should be
Packet Page 113 of 225
Firdale Village Site -- Design Standards -- 18
A.D. Shapiro Architects, PS
located adjacent to a courtyard or other usable public outdoor spaces or
plazas, so as to be easily located and accessible to the public. The
property manager/owner should provide access to the room on a
reservation basis, and provide custodial service for the space on a regular
basis.
A restaurant or coffee shop may provide such a meeting room adjacent
to a primary dining room as an amenity, and may determine rules of
access and reservation of the space.
22.100.040 Vehicular Access and Parking
A. Parking Layout and Design
1. Parking should be located on the sides, to the rear of projects or below
grade with pedestrian connections between the parking areas and the commercial
and/or residential buildings.
2. Building siting and parking design shall maximize opportunities for
pedestrian and vehicular circulation between adjacent buildings or subdistricts,
such as joint access easements and common driveways. The layout shall limit the
conflict between pedestrians and cars to the greatest extent possible.
B. Access Drives
Building siting and parking design shall maximize opportunities for
shared parking, access entries and driveways in order to minimize the number of
curb cuts. This will help to limit possible conflicts between pedestrians and
vehicles entering and leaving the parking area.
C. Vehicular Entrances and Driveways
The site plan shall allow maximum of three (3) access points from Firdale
Avenue to the project.
22.100.050 Site Landscaping & Screening Elements
A. General Landscaping
Site landscaping shall be designed to achieve the project vision as described in
Section A. Trees and landscaping shall be incorporated into the site design in
order to provide a more attractive overall pedestrian oriented environment and
to soften and screen the visual impact of hard surfaces such as parking lots,
service areas, walkways and gathering places. Outdoor furniture shall be
compatible with the project architecture and shall be carefully considered as
integral elements of the landscape.
Packet Page 114 of 225
Firdale Village Site -- Design Standards -- 19
A.D. Shapiro Architects, PS
The combination of trees, planted areas, potted plants, and street furniture
all work together to create an inviting, walkable environment.
1. A range of landscape materials, trees, evergreen shrubs, groundcovers
and seasonal flowers shall be provided for color and visual interest.
2. Trees should be placed to allow southern sun exposure in such a
manner as not to conflict with pedestrian activity areas. (For this reason trees
with a fine leaf texture are also preferred in the plaza.)
3. Planters or large pots with small shrubs and seasonal flowers may
also be used to separate café seating from traffic flow and create protected sub-
areas within the plaza for sitting and people watching.
4. Creative use of plant materials such as climbing vines or trellises, and
use of sculpture groupings, etc. are also encouraged.
5. Native and drought tolerant plants shall be used where possible. A
minimum of 20% of all landscaped areas should include native drought
tolerant plants.
6. Sun angle at noon and wind pattern shall be considered in the design
of the open space and courtyards to maximize sunlight areas.
7. Recommended materials include: brick, concrete, unit pavers, tile,
stone and wood (some seating).
8. No dumpsters or service areas shall be adjacent to open space.
9. Public restrooms should be located nearby in an accessible public
space.
Packet Page 115 of 225
Firdale Village Site -- Design Standards -- 20
A.D. Shapiro Architects, PS
Various forms of landscaping, including trees, planted areas, hanging plants, trellises and uses of potted
plants, site lighting, help to create an inviting and attractive ambiance within the development.
B. Landscaping – Parking Lots
1. Parking areas shall be screened from pedestrian-oriented areas
through the use of trees, shrubs, walls and/or trellis structures with
plants.
2. Parking lots shall provide landscaping next to buildings and along
walkways. Landscape beds within parking lots shall have a 90%
ground coverage in five years.
3. Parking areas shall have one tree per every 10 parking stalls.
C. Screening Elements
Intent: To minimize the negative visual impacts of service and storage
elements (ie. waste receptacles, loading docks), to the street and
pedestrian environment.
1. On-site Service Areas.
A well-designed
landscape plan will help
to provide walkable
connections and usable
open space throughout
the project.
Packet Page 116 of 225
Firdale Village Site -- Design Standards -- 21
A.D. Shapiro Architects, PS
All on-site service areas, loading zones, outdoor storage areas, garbage collection
and recycling areas shall be located in an area not visible from public streets or
important pedestrian areas of the site. These areas shall be enclosed and
screened around their perimeter by a wall or fence at least seven feet high.
Service areas should be located and designed for easy access by service vehicles
and for convenient access by each tenant.
2. Service elements shall be located and designed to minimize the
impacts of the pedestrian environment and adjacent uses. Service elements
should generally by concentrated and located where they are accessible to service
vehicles and convenient for tenant use.
3. Roof-mounted mechanical equipment, meters and similar structures
and other similar elements shall be located so as not be visible from the street,
public open space, parking areas, or from the ground level of adjacent properties.
Screening features shall blend with the adjacent buildings and project as a whole.
22.100.060 Signage
A. Design Intent:
To encourage signage that is clear, attractive and of an appropriate scale
for the project.
To provide consistent design criteria for the entire project.
To enhance the visual qualities of signage through the use of
complementary sizes, colors and methods of illumination.
To provide signage guidelines that meet commercial tenant needs.
General Signage
Types of signage fall into several categories:
Tenant Signs (large and small), Site Entry Markers and Identification
Signs, Wayfinding signage, and Environmental Graphic Design
Elements
B. Design Standards
1. Signage must be of a high quality of design and materials, consistent
with the design of the project. Signage shall be consistent throughou t the
project and always complement a building’s character.
Packet Page 117 of 225
Firdale Village Site -- Design Standards -- 22
A.D. Shapiro Architects, PS
2. Signage shall be designed as an integral element of the building’s
Architecture. Wall and blade signs shall not interfere with Architectural details
or disrupt the rhythm of windows.
3.. Signage shall make a positive contribution to the overall visual
character of the streetscape. Signs shall be appropriately sized with the scale of
the building. Materials and colors used in the construction of signs shall be
compatible with the overall design of the site.
Retail entry with hanging blade signs to left of entry. Storefront exhibits strong pedestrian orientation and
attention to detail including: recessed entry door, glass storefront, arched element over entry door, contrasting
materials of storefront, structural canopy and landscape planters in front.
4. Signs may be fabricated of mixed-media, including metal reverse-
illuminated letters, suspended neon letters, illuminated individual letters, signs
etched or cutout of solid materials such as wood or brass and illuminated from
behind.
Packet Page 118 of 225
Firdale Village Site -- Design Standards -- 23
A.D. Shapiro Architects, PS
Mixed media sign above door. Retail sign with large individual letters above canopy.
5. Internally illuminated boxes with formed or painted lettering are not
permitted. Large internally illuminated boxes that serve as monument signs are
not permitted.
6. Instead, larger signs of wood or other non-transparent or translucent
material are allowed that have exterior sources of illumination (as opposed to
internal). Monument signs constructed from plastic or plastic-like material are
not allowed. However, monument signs that provide primary development
identification (project name) constructed from materials such as wood, metal or
other durable materials are allowed.
Monument sign on pedestal Ground level monument sign constructed
of solid materials
7. ‘Way finding signage.’ The project shall include a coordinated
system of signs to aid in visitor orientation and navigation through the project.
Packet Page 119 of 225
Firdale Village Site -- Design Standards -- 24
A.D. Shapiro Architects, PS
22.100.070 Site Lighting
A. Objectives.
Lighting shall be an integral part of all components of the development.
Lighting shall contribute to the individuality, security and safety of the
site design without having overpowering effects on the adjacent areas.
Lighting is viewed as an important feature, for functional and security
purposes, as well as to enhance the streetscape and public spaces.
1. The design of light fixtures and their structural support shall be
integrated with the architectural theme and style of the main structures
on the site, and with landscaping.
2. Pedestrian scale lighting (maximum 15’ height) and/or bollard
lighting shall be used to define pedestrian walkways, connections and
other pedestrian areas within the development.
Packet Page 120 of 225
Firdale Village Site -- Design Standards -- 25
A.D. Shapiro Architects, PS
Decorative pedestrian scale lighting along walkway Light fixture with hanging plants in
near parking lots. front of storefront.
3. Along walkways, low level lighting that directs light downward onto
the ground surface is encouraged. The design of the fixtures shall be
compatible with the overall design of the development, and shatterproof
lamp coverings will be used. The fixtures will be placed to minimize
glare and shall be located as to not present hazards for pedestrians or
vehicles.
4. All lighting shall be shielded from the sky and adjacent properties and
structures, either through exterior shields or through optics within the
fixture. Light shall not spill out onto surrounding properties or project
above the horizontal plan. Warm lighting colors are encouraged.
5. Within parking lots, a minimum foot candle of (1.0) at the perimeter
of light sources and between light sources, and 5.0 under light fixtures is
recommended. Light shall not exceed 0.5 foot candles at any property
line.
6. Wall mounted lights shall be directed downward. Soffit mounted
light fixtures shall be recessed in the soffit or otherwise fully shielded
from any property line. Ground mounted or other upward directional
lighting will be permitted only where some form of shielding or light
baffling is provided to create a soft, uniform light quality and minimize
light spillage beyond the wall or sign being illuminated.
Packet Page 121 of 225
Firdale Village Site -- Design Standards -- 26
A.D. Shapiro Architects, PS
22.100.080 Safety Issues
A. Intent:
Visitors and residents should find that the development provides the best
possible design to protect their personal safety and safety of their property. The
development shall consider safety issues in all aspects of design, with particular
focus on safety of pedestrians within the development as well as links to transit
and outside access to the development.
B. Standards:
1. Architectural features should be used to provide weather protection
and shade, well as highlight building features and entries.
2. Landscaping and lighting shall be used to identify entrances,
pathways, public spaces and bus stops.
3. Lighting shall contribute to the overall safety of the development,
and landscaping should incorporate safe-by-design standards.
4. Covered bus stops and waiting areas shall be included to provide
pedestrians with outdoor areas sheltered from extreme weather conditions.
22.100.90 Sustainable Design
A. Incentive.
In exchange for allowing four-story buildings for the multi-residential portion of
the project, the development would be required to meet the requirements for at
least a 4-star rating of the Built Green of Washington program, or the LEED
Gold Standard, with integration of sustainable design methods and technologies
throughout the project.
If the project does not include four-story buildings in the multi-family sub-
district, then the project must meet the requirement for at least a 3-star
rating of the Built Green of Washington program. Particular focus will be given
to low-impact site design strategies, water efficiency and energy efficiency
methodologies.
B. Design Goals for Project
Incorporate goals for integration of sustainability at earliest stages of
design process possible. Decide on projected levels of achievement for
Packet Page 122 of 225
Firdale Village Site -- Design Standards -- 27
A.D. Shapiro Architects, PS
the project – For example: The project will achieve at least a 4-star level
of the Built Green of Washington program
1. Site Design and Water Use
The proposed development will integrate low impact
development techniques where reasonably feasible. For the
purposes of this section, low impact development techniques
shall include, but shall not be limited to, the following: the use of
bio swales, green roofs, and grasscrete.
"Reasonably feasible" shall be determined based upon the
physical characteristics of the property and its suitability for the
technique; cost alone shall not render the use of low impact
techniques unreasonable or unfeasible.
Additional techniques for strong consideration:
Rainwater harvesting – for use in site irrigation and possibly
toilet flushing for commercial uses.
Utilization of water efficient fixtures throughout the project.
2. Energy Resources
Increase efficiency by maximizing equipment efficiency and using
control strategies. Design to reduce energy and electricity
consumption and eliminate unnecessary demand. Include use of
alternative energy resources wherever possible.
3. Material Resources
Plan for long term use by designing for adaptability, specifying
durable materials and considering energy and maintenance needs.
elect resource efficient and recycled materials where possible, that
minimize environmental impact.
Utilize wood from sustainable sources.
Encourage recycling of waste with easy access recycling stations and
pick-up areas.
Manage construction demolition and waste with a jobsite recycling
plan.
Packet Page 123 of 225
Firdale Village Site -- Design Standards -- 28
A.D. Shapiro Architects, PS
4. Health and Indoor Air Quality
Utilize multiple strategies to limit emissions from materials Select low
VOC and non-toxic materials, paints and finishes. Pay special
attention to residential units in selection of finishes and paints for
low or no toxicity.
Sustainable stormwater mitigation and site
drainage system
Definitions
This section will provide clarification of some of the specific terminology
used within the guidelines.
Courtyard:
A landscaped spaced enclosed on at least three sides by a structure(s).
Curb Cut:
A depression in the curb for the purpose of accommodating a driveway
that provides vehicular access between private property and the street (or
ADA/bike crossing at street corners).
Façade:
Any vertical exterior wall of a building.
Possible use of green roofs and other innovative
technologies.
Packet Page 124 of 225
Firdale Village Site -- Design Standards -- 29
A.D. Shapiro Architects, PS
Frontage:
Refers to the length of property along a public street or right-of-way.
Landscaping:
An area is considered to be landscaped if it is:
Planted with vegetation in the form of hardy trees, shrubs, or Grass
or evergreen groundcover maintained in good condition; or occupied
by sculpture, fountains, pools, benches, or other Outdoor
furnishings; or Occupied by recreational facilities; or Paved with
decorative pavers, brick combined with any of the above items.
Modulation:
As used in the Design Guidelines, modulation is a stepping back, or
projecting forward of portions of a building face within specified
intervals of building width and depth, as a means of breaking up the
apparent bulk of a structure’s continuous exterior walls.
Pedestrian-Oriented Façade:
A building façade is considered “pedestrian-oriented” if it features any of
the following characteristics:
A transparent window along at least 75 percent of the ground floor
between the height of two feet and eight feet above the ground.
Frontage along a pedestrian-oriented space.
Pedestrian-Oriented Space:
An area between a building and a public space that promotes visual and
pedestrian access to the site and provides pedestrian oriented amenities
and landscaping to enhance the public’s use of the space for passive
activities such as sitting, reading, picnicking, etc.
A “pedestrian-oriented” space must have:
Visual and pedestrian access into the site from the public right of
way;
Paved walking surfaces of either concrete or approved unit paving;
On-site or building-mounted lighting;
Seating comprised of at two feet of seating area (bench, ledge, etc.),
or one individual seat per 60 SF of plaza area or open space.
A “pedestrian-oriented” space is encouraged to have: Site furniture,
amenities such as fountains, kiosk, artwork, and landscaping that
does not act as a visual barrier.
Human Scale:
The perceived size of a building relative to a human being. A building is
considered to have “good human scale” if there is an expression of
human activity or use that indicates the building’s size. For example,
traditionally sized doors, windows, and balconies are elements that
respond to the size of the human body, and therefore are elements in a
building that indicate a building’s overall size.
Packet Page 125 of 225
Firdale Village Site -- Design Standards -- 30
A.D. Shapiro Architects, PS
Vertical Articulation:
Visual division of a building’s façade into distinct sections or elements to
reduce the apparent horizontal length of the façade.
Packet Page 126 of 225
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
October 6, 2009
Page 12
COUNCILMEMBER WAMBOLT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PETERSON,
TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 1208 DECLARING THE COUNCIL’S OPPOSITION TO
INITIATIVE 1033. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Mayor Haakenson declared a brief recess.
7. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING ON THE PLANNING BOARD RECOMMENDATION TO
APPROVE THE CREATION OF A NEW MIXED USE ZONING CLASSIFICATION FOR
FIRDALE VILLAGE TO IMPLEMENT THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. (FILE NO. AMD-2008-
10 / APPLICANT: SHAPIRO ARCHITECTS)
Planning Manager Rob Chave explained this was a proposal by the applicants that would result in adding
a new zoning classification to the City’s Code with accompanying design standards. The Council held a
public hearing previously on this item; the applicant made modifications to the proposal in response to
Council and public comment at that public hearing. If the Council agrees to add this code language, the
applicant would then need to submit an application to apply it to the property which could be done via a
development agreement that would identify the specific measures they would apply to the property to
implement the Zoning Code.
City Attorney Scott Snyder explained in order to achieve the proposed buffer, a development agreement
or other form of assured dedication would be appropriate to satisfy the criteria. If the Council feels the
tree buffer should be preserved, it cannot be imposed by ordinance but would need to be required via a
development agreement.
Councilmember Plunkett clarified this was a legislative matter. Mr. Snyder agreed.
Tony Shapiro, Shapiro Architects, advised his client and he participated in at least four meetings with
Councilmember Wambolt, Council President Wilson, and Planning Manager Rob Chave to address the
Council’s concerns. He reviewed modifications made to the zoning criteria:
The 25% criteria dedicated to commercial and retail space in the zoning criteria was clarified.
Multi family dwellings are prohibited in District 1 so no housing will be in the zone facing
Firdale Avenue
A limit of 2,500 square feet for retail spaces throughout the complex was discussed. In
discussion with Mr. Chave and property management experience, it would be challenging to
implement that limit. He suggested market conditions be allowed to drive small retailers in this
zone.
A clause was added to allow only retail and restaurants on the ground floor to enhance the
neighborhood feel of the complex and commercial space such as professional offices would be on
the upper floors.
Mr. Snyder provided several clarifications to the language throughout the document.
The design standards were reviewed in detail and many “should” became “shall.” He commented
the proposed design standards struck a balance between establishing minimum criteria as well as
providing sufficient flexibility to achieve a good product.
Council President Wilson thanked Mr. Shapiro for working with them over the past two months. He
assured the design standards were reviewed in detail and of the 67 “should” statements in the design
standards, 56 were changed to “shall.” There were also incentives added for green buildings, not just
experiential elements but also stormwater management. He summarized the design standards had several
innovative elements.
Packet Page 127 of 225
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
October 6, 2009
Page 13
Councilmember Orvis inquired about the lot coverage requirements for the zone. Mr. Shapiro answered
there was no specific lot coverage requirement. They must achieve a 20% open space criteria that cannot
include parking lots or traffic/service areas.
Councilmember Peterson commented the standards provided some incentives for achieving a LEED gold
certification. He asked whether a LEED gold certification changed the other standards such as the
parking requirements. Mr. Shapiro answered one of the key components of LEED was site orientation
such as toward solar or territorial winds. It does not address parking. To achieve four stories and the
desired density, a project would need to achieve a LEED gold certification or other green criteria. Mr.
Snyder agreed, noting the only incentive is the four stories shown on page 5. Councilmember Peterson
expressed his support for incorporating progressive design into the standards. As an example, Mr.
Shapiro commented green roofs were very expensive, but up to 75% of the water could be retained in a
green roof, allowing smaller detention tanks and reducing the load on the City’s stormwater facilities.
Councilmember Peterson wanted to ensure the code language made it easy to achieve these goals. Mr.
Shapiro commented the LEED rating was achieved via meeting criteria on a checklist. Mr. Snyder
responded the technical details would be addressed via the determination of impervious surface via the
City’s stormwater standards.
Council President Wilson expressed concern the language was not clear enough that there was a three
story limit in District 2 with the exception of when LEED gold standard was achieved. When a LEED
gold standard was achieved, a four story building could be attained. He recommended including language
in zoning criteria section 16.100.040.B.1.b.1 and B.1.b.2 regarding a three story height limit if the LEED
gold standard was not achieved. Mr. Snyder offered to make the appropriate revision.
Mayor Haakenson opened the public participation portion of the public hearing.
Lora Petso, Edmonds, expressed her appreciation for including the 25% commercial requirement and
asked if it would result in more or less commercial space at the site. She requested staff review the
parking requirements, commenting it appeared this project may require only 1 parking space per 400
square feet of commercial. In downtown Edmonds, the parking ratios are 1 space per 300 square feet of
commercial, in an area where there is also on-street parking versus Firdale Village where there is no on-
street parking.
Roger Hertrich, Edmonds, commented he had good feelings about the changes that had been proposed
and the neighborhood also supports the proposed changes. Observing mixed use would result in
additional residents, he inquired whether there was a requirement for additional park facilities. He
suggested rather than establishing a percentage for retail, requiring no less retail space than currently
exists. He expressed concern with imposing rules on development such as green roofs, pointing out such
requirements increase the cost to the developer. He pointed out there was no developer for Firdale
Village; this was only a change in zoning.
Hearing no further comment, Mayor Haakenson closed the public participation portion of the public
hearing.
For Council President Wilson, Mr. Snyder advised the proposed change was within the range of
alternatives that had been considered and would not require that the public hearing be continued. He
advised this would be put in ordinance form and scheduled on a future Consent Agenda.
COUNCIL PRESIDENT WILSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER WAMBOLT,
TO DIRECT STAFF TO PREPARE AN ORDINANCE FOR COUNCIL ADOPTION.
Packet Page 128 of 225
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
October 6, 2009
Page 14
Councilmember Orvis advised he would not support this action due to his concern with the conversion of
a Neighborhood Business Zone, specifically allowing a 52-foot tall building within 20 feet of a residential
boundary. He understood the economic development opportunity but questioned the need to allow over
three stories. He preferred to require the LEED standards. He was willing to go slightly above 30 feet for
multi family but not as high as 52 feet.
Council President Wilson commented there was a great deal of support for redevelopment of Firdale
Village. The question was the vision for the site and how to integrate it into the community. If
development occurs based on this zoning, it would be one of the more innovative developments in the
area. He advised the development would be three stories unless the developer used innovative design and
development techniques to develop a project everyone could be proud of. This was an opportunity to
make good on promises for redevelopment and interest in providing smart, innovative development,
managing stormwater, and fostering transit oriented development.
Councilmember Wambolt acknowledged Councilmember Orvis’ concern with the 52-foot tall building
adjacent to residential property, pointing out the property owners have offered to retain the existing stand
of trees via a development agreement to mitigate the building height.
MOTION CARRIED (5-1), COUNCILMEMBER ORVIS OPPOSED.
8. PUBLIC HEARING ON THE PLANNING BOARD'S RECOMMENDATION TO ADOPT AN
ORDINANCE ADDING A NEW SECTION TO EDMONDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
CODE 17.40 TO ESTABLISH A QUALIFIED BUILDING SETBACK EXEMPTION FOR
RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS WITH EXPIRED COUNTY BUILDING PERMITS (FILE NO.
AMD20090011).
Planner Jennifer Machuga explained following annexation from Snohomish County into the City, the
County did not transfer all records of pending building permit applications for approval as required by the
Annexation Agreement. As a result, there is at least one project that received approval by the County
based on the setbacks in effect prior to annexation. The permit expired prior to final approval. Per the
Annexation Agreement all vesting is lost and the applicant must obtain permits based on current City
code. In this example, the project does not comply with current City setback requirements.
The proposed ordinance strives to remedy this situation by allowing a building setback exemption for
projects that had County approval for property annexed since 1994. The Planning Board recommends
approval of the proposed ordinance.
Mayor Haakenson opened the public participation portion of the public hearing. There were no members
of the public present who wished to address the Council. Mayor Haakenson closed the public testimony
portion of the public hearing.
COUNCILMEMBER WAMBOLT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER ORVIS, TO
APPROVE THE ORDINANCE RECOMMENDED BY THE PLANNING BOARD (ORDINANCE
NO. 3756). MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
9. AUDIENCE COMMENTS
Diane Buckshnis, Edmonds, encouraged the Council not to take action on Agenda Item 12 which would
adopt an amended 2009 budget. She recalled informing the Council she was unable to balance the
General Fund beginning balance for 2009 to the ending balance December 31, 2008. She emailed Interim
Packet Page 129 of 225
AM-2561 2.G.
Poverty Week proclamation
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:10/27/2009
Submitted By:Linda Carl
Submitted For:Gary Haakenson Time:Consent
Department:Mayor's Office Type:Information
Review Committee:
Committee Action:
Information
Subject Title
Proclamation in honor of Finding an End to Poverty Week, November 2 - 8, 2009.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Previous Council Action
Narrative
Poverty and homelessness continue to be a problem worldwide as well as in Snohomish County.
Edmonds United Methodist Church is hosting a Poverty Conference on November 7 in order to
highlight hunger awareness, global initiatives addressing poverty, and the need for clean water
worldwide.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: Proclamation
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 10/21/2009 03:40 PM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 10/21/2009 03:50 PM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 10/21/2009 04:13 PM APRV
Form Started By: Linda
Carl
Started On: 10/21/2009 02:35
PM
Final Approval Date: 10/21/2009
Packet Page 130 of 225
Packet Page 131 of 225
AM-2562 2.H.
Diabetes Awareness proclamation
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:10/27/2009
Submitted By:Linda Carl
Submitted For:Gary Haakenson Time:Consent
Department:Mayor's Office Type:Information
Review Committee:
Committee Action:
Information
Subject Title
Proclamation in honor of Diabetes Awareness Month, November 2009.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Previous Council Action
Narrative
Diabetes affects 24 million people in the United States, including 343,000 in Washington State. If
the current trend continues, one in three children born today will face a future with diabetes.
During American Diabetes Month (November 2009), the American Diabetes Association is
launching an initiative to confront, fight, and stop diabetes.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: Proclamation
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 10/21/2009 03:40 PM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 10/21/2009 03:50 PM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 10/21/2009 04:13 PM APRV
Form Started By: Linda
Carl
Started On: 10/21/2009 02:47
PM
Final Approval Date: 10/21/2009
Packet Page 132 of 225
Packet Page 133 of 225
AM-2566 4.
Public Hearing on Fire District 1 Contract, Option 4
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:10/27/2009
Submitted By:Sandy Chase Time:30 Minutes
Department:City Clerk's Office Type:Action
Review Committee:
Committee Action:
Information
Subject Title
Public hearing on Fire District 1 Contract, Option 4. In addition to contracting for services
with Fire District 1, this option includes selling apparatus (engines, aid cars, and
equipment), and keeping fire stations, land and transport fees.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Receive comments from the public.
Previous Council Action
At the October 20, 2009 City Council Meeting, the City Council voted 5-2 to further consider
two options regarding the Fire District 1 contract offer:
Option 1: Do not enter into a contract with Fire District 1
Option 4: Contract for services with Fire District 1; sell apparatus (engines, aid cars, and
equipment), and keep fire stations, land and transport fees.
Narrative
Attached for your consideration are the following documents:
•Attachment 1: Interlocal Agreement for Fire and Emergency Medical Services with Fire District
1
•Attachment 2: Exhibits A through J referenced in the Interlocal Agreement
•Attachment 3: Financial Summary of Option 4
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: Attachment 1 - Interlocal Agreement with Fire District 1
Link: Attachment 2 - Exhibits A thru J referenced in the Interlocal Agreement
Link: Attachment 3 - Financial Summary of Option 4
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 10/22/2009 10:15 AM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 10/22/2009 10:19 AM APRV
Packet Page 134 of 225
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 10/22/2009 10:21 AM APRV
Form Started By: Sandy
Chase
Started On: 10/22/2009 10:05
AM
Final Approval Date: 10/22/2009
Packet Page 135 of 225
Packet Page 136 of 225
Packet Page 137 of 225
Packet Page 138 of 225
Packet Page 139 of 225
Packet Page 140 of 225
Packet Page 141 of 225
Packet Page 142 of 225
Packet Page 143 of 225
Packet Page 144 of 225
Packet Page 145 of 225
Packet Page 146 of 225
Packet Page 147 of 225
Packet Page 148 of 225
Packet Page 149 of 225
Packet Page 150 of 225
Packet Page 151 of 225
Packet Page 152 of 225
Packet Page 153 of 225
Packet Page 154 of 225
Packet Page 155 of 225
Packet Page 156 of 225
Packet Page 157 of 225
Packet Page 158 of 225
Packet Page 159 of 225
Packet Page 160 of 225
Packet Page 161 of 225
Packet Page 162 of 225
Packet Page 163 of 225
Packet Page 164 of 225
Packet Page 165 of 225
Packet Page 166 of 225
Packet Page 167 of 225
Packet Page 168 of 225
Packet Page 169 of 225
Packet Page 170 of 225
Packet Page 171 of 225
Packet Page 172 of 225
Packet Page 173 of 225
Packet Page 174 of 225
Packet Page 175 of 225
Packet Page 176 of 225
Packet Page 177 of 225
Packet Page 178 of 225
Packet Page 179 of 225
Packet Page 180 of 225
Packet Page 181 of 225
Packet Page 182 of 225
Packet Page 183 of 225
Packet Page 184 of 225
Packet Page 185 of 225
Packet Page 186 of 225
Packet Page 187 of 225
Packet Page 188 of 225
Packet Page 189 of 225
Packet Page 190 of 225
Packet Page 191 of 225
Packet Page 192 of 225
Packet Page 193 of 225
Packet Page 194 of 225
Packet Page 195 of 225
Packet Page 196 of 225
Packet Page 197 of 225
Packet Page 198 of 225
Packet Page 199 of 225
Packet Page 200 of 225
Packet Page 201 of 225
Packet Page 202 of 225
Packet Page 203 of 225
Packet Page 204 of 225
Packet Page 205 of 225
Packet Page 206 of 225
Packet Page 207 of 225
Packet Page 208 of 225
Packet Page 209 of 225
Packet Page 210 of 225
Packet Page 211 of 225
Packet Page 212 of 225
Packet Page 213 of 225
Packet Page 214 of 225
Packet Page 215 of 225
Packet Page 216 of 225
Packet Page 217 of 225
Packet Page 218 of 225
Packet Page 219 of 225
Packet Page 220 of 225
Packet Page 221 of 225
Packet Page 222 of 225
Packet Page 223 of 225
Packet Page 224 of 225
16
-
O
c
t
-
0
9
Ci
t
y
o
f
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
:
S
t
r
a
t
e
g
i
c
O
u
t
l
o
o
k
20
0
8
2
0
0
8
A
c
t
u
a
l
2
0
0
9
20
0
9
20
1
0
2
0
1
0
2
0
1
1
2
0
1
2
2
0
1
3
2
0
1
4
2
0
1
5
2016
RE
V
E
N
U
E
Ou
t
l
o
o
k
@
1
/
2
8
/
0
9
B
u
d
g
e
t
O
u
t
l
o
o
k
B
u
d
g
e
t
O
u
t
l
o
o
k
O
u
t
l
o
o
k
O
u
t
l
o
o
k
O
u
t
l
o
o
k
O
u
t
l
o
o
k
O
u
t
l
o
o
k
O
u
t
l
o
o
k
Be
g
i
n
n
i
n
g
F
u
n
d
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
3
,
6
4
1
,
2
5
0
3
,
6
4
1
,
2
5
0
9
7
7
,
9
5
1
1
,
3
4
1
,
9
7
1
1
,
2
7
3
,
2
6
5
1
,
7
5
3
,
6
1
5
3
,
0
2
6
,
6
7
4
2
,
3
8
8
,
0
6
4
1
,
2
4
4
,
0
8
0
(
4
0
2
,
1
2
4
)
(2,633,035) (5,341,777)
Pr
o
p
e
r
t
y
T
a
x
1
2
,
3
1
8
,
0
2
3
1
2
,
2
8
5
,
7
1
9
1
3
,
9
3
0
,
1
7
4
1
3
,
9
3
0
,
1
7
4
1
4
,
1
6
0
,
0
6
2
1
4
,
0
7
9
,
0
6
6
1
4
,
2
7
9
,
0
7
3
1
4
,
4
7
3
,
5
8
8
1
4
,
7
1
3
,
7
4
8
1
4
,
9
6
3
,
8
2
7
15,206,624 15,450,498
Re
t
a
i
l
S
a
l
e
s
T
a
x
5
,
2
0
6
,
5
1
1
5
,
0
6
0
,
3
4
9
5
,
3
6
9
,
9
4
8
4
,
2
5
6
,
2
7
4
5
,
5
1
9
,
9
4
9
4
,
2
5
6
,
2
7
4
4
,
5
5
5
,
2
4
4
4
,
7
3
1
,
9
2
7
4
,
9
1
7
,
3
8
2
5
,
1
1
2
,
3
0
4
5,317,469 5,533,751
Ot
h
e
r
S
a
l
e
s
&
U
s
e
T
a
x
6
6
5
,
9
0
1
6
3
5
,
0
1
6
6
6
5
,
9
0
1
5
4
3
,
0
1
3
6
6
5
,
9
0
1
5
4
3
,
0
1
3
5
9
6
,
0
2
9
6
5
4
,
3
2
1
7
1
8
,
4
1
6
7
8
8
,
8
9
4
866,392 951,612
Ut
i
l
i
t
y
T
a
x
4
,
5
8
5
,
7
5
6
4
,
7
1
1
,
8
2
2
5
,
1
0
2
,
3
1
4
5
,
1
0
2
,
3
1
4
5
,
2
2
5
,
3
1
1
5
,
2
2
5
,
3
1
1
5
,
3
6
6
,
7
6
6
5
,
5
1
2
,
6
7
6
5
,
6
6
3
,
2
0
7
5
,
8
1
8
,
5
3
1
5,978,825 6,144,277
Ot
h
e
r
T
a
x
e
s
2
9
7
,
4
0
0
3
1
4
,
6
3
9
2
9
7
,
5
0
0
2
9
7
,
5
0
0
2
9
7
,
5
0
0
2
9
7
,
5
0
0
3
0
2
,
9
0
0
3
0
8
,
4
0
3
3
1
4
,
0
0
9
3
1
9
,
7
2
3
325,545 331,478
Li
c
e
n
s
e
s
/
P
e
r
m
i
t
s
/
F
r
a
n
c
h
i
s
e
8
2
3
,
5
6
5
8
7
9
,
7
4
3
1
,
3
8
9
,
9
4
3
1
,
3
8
9
,
9
4
3
1
,
4
1
7
,
4
3
7
1
,
4
1
7
,
4
3
7
1
,
4
5
2
,
8
7
3
1
,
4
8
9
,
1
9
5
1
,
5
2
6
,
4
2
5
1
,
5
6
4
,
5
8
5
1,603,700 1,643,793
Co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
P
e
r
m
i
t
s
6
9
5
,
0
0
0
6
7
5
,
8
2
0
7
0
7
,
0
0
0
7
0
7
,
0
0
0
6
8
9
,
7
6
7
6
8
9
,
7
6
7
6
5
5
,
2
7
8
6
2
2
,
5
1
4
5
9
1
,
3
8
9
561,819 533,728 507,042
Gr
a
n
t
s
3
0
,
6
8
0
4
6
,
2
4
5
1
1
,
1
4
4
1
1
,
1
4
4
4
,
6
4
4
4
,
6
4
4
-
-
-
- - -
St
a
t
e
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
s
70
2
,
1
1
0
70
9
,
9
4
7
74
5
,
9
4
2
74
5
,
9
4
2
75
2
,
4
2
6
75
2
,
4
2
7
74
4
,
7
9
3
75
2
,
2
8
6
75
9
,
9
1
1
767,671 775,568 783,606
In
t
e
r
g
o
v
'
t
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
C
h
a
r
g
e
s
97
3
,
4
9
6
1,
0
4
6
,
0
6
4
1,
3
2
3
,
3
2
0
1,
2
9
8
,
3
2
0
1,
3
5
6
,
7
0
5
23
2
,
9
5
4
24
4
,
5
2
2
25
6
,
6
6
6
26
9
,
4
1
5
282,798 296,847 311,596
In
t
e
r
f
u
n
d
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
C
h
a
r
g
e
s
1,
2
4
2
,
4
4
8
1,
1
8
7
,
7
1
7
1,
3
2
2
,
0
0
9
1,
3
2
2
,
0
0
9
1,
3
5
5
,
0
5
9
1,
3
5
5
,
0
5
9
1,
3
8
8
,
9
3
6
1,
4
2
3
,
6
5
9
1,
4
5
9
,
2
5
1
1,495,732 1,533,125 1,571,453
Ch
g
s
.
f
o
r
G
o
o
d
s
&
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
1,
7
6
1
,
7
4
7
1,
7
7
5
,
1
1
2
2,
7
7
8
,
1
5
4
2,
6
5
8
,
1
5
4
3,
2
0
0
,
1
9
4
3,
2
0
0
,
1
9
4
3,
2
3
2
,
8
0
1
3,
2
6
8
,
5
9
4
3,
3
0
7
,
5
3
3
3,349,584 3,394,718 3,442,911
Fi
n
e
s
&
F
o
r
f
e
i
t
s
52
5
,
0
5
0
59
3
,
1
2
2
59
2
,
5
0
0
59
2
,
5
0
0
64
0
,
3
0
0
64
0
,
3
0
0
65
6
,
3
0
8
67
2
,
7
1
5
68
9
,
5
3
3
706,771 724,441 742,552
Mi
s
c
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
s
65
9
,
1
6
7
67
1
,
5
2
6
58
0
,
1
9
3
67
1
,
6
9
3
52
1
,
2
7
6
1,
5
0
3
,
0
5
6
52
0
,
7
2
7
52
6
,
7
3
5
53
6
,
1
8
3
547,517 559,963 573,139
An
n
u
a
l
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
30
,
4
8
6
,
8
5
4
30
,
5
9
2
,
8
4
1
34
,
8
1
6
,
0
4
2
33
,
5
2
5
,
9
8
0
35
,
8
0
6
,
5
3
1
34
,
1
9
7
,
0
0
1
33
,
9
9
6
,
2
5
1
34
,
6
9
3
,
2
8
1
35
,
4
6
6
,
4
0
3
36,279,756 37,116,946 37,987,707
An
n
u
a
l
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
G
r
o
w
t
h
2.
0
%
-
0
.
6
%
2
.
1
%
2
.
2
%
2
.
3
%
2.3%2.3%
To
t
a
l
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
34
,
1
2
8
,
1
0
4
34
,
2
3
4
,
0
9
1
35
,
7
9
3
,
9
9
3
34
,
8
6
7
,
9
5
2
37
,
0
7
9
,
7
9
6
35
,
9
5
0
,
6
1
6
37
,
0
2
2
,
9
2
4
37
,
0
8
1
,
3
4
5
36
,
7
1
0
,
4
8
2
35,877,631 34,483,911 32,645,931
20
0
8
2
0
0
8
A
c
t
u
a
l
2
0
0
9
20
0
9
20
1
0
2
0
1
0
2
0
1
1
2
0
1
2
2
0
1
3
2
0
1
4
2
0
1
5
2016
Ex
p
e
n
s
e
s
b
y
F
u
n
c
t
i
o
n
O
u
t
l
o
o
k
@
1
/
2
8
/
0
9
B
u
d
g
e
t
O
u
t
l
o
o
k
B
u
d
g
e
t
O
u
t
l
o
o
k
O
u
t
l
o
o
k
O
u
t
l
o
o
k
O
u
t
l
o
o
k
O
u
t
l
o
o
k
O
u
t
l
o
o
k
O
u
t
l
o
o
k
La
b
o
r
22
,
7
7
5
,
2
4
3
22
,
6
4
1
,
7
3
0
23
,
9
6
2
,
7
0
8
22
,
9
1
0
,
8
2
3
25
,
0
2
3
,
7
2
1
17
,
1
5
5
,
1
7
6
18
,
1
0
4
,
6
7
1
18
,
8
4
3
,
3
8
5
19
,
6
5
4
,
1
8
5
20,512,370 21,421,732 22,386,430
Su
p
p
l
i
e
s
72
6
,
1
7
4
64
9
,
9
0
7
70
6
,
8
9
0
69
1
,
0
7
0
70
3
,
9
6
6
58
4
,
3
6
6
59
8
,
9
7
5
61
3
,
9
5
0
62
9
,
2
9
8
645,031 661,156 677,685
Se
r
v
i
c
e
s
3,
8
9
0
,
7
6
5
3,
8
5
6
,
2
2
4
3,
8
3
9
,
8
8
6
3,
7
8
3
,
1
9
8
3,
8
5
4
,
7
5
5
9,
7
3
2
,
4
3
9
10
,
0
1
0
,
9
8
4
10
,
2
9
9
,
8
7
4
10
,
5
9
9
,
7
0
0
10,911,097 11,234,753 11,571,412
In
t
e
r
g
o
v
'
t
1,
8
1
3
,
9
6
8
1,
7
8
8
,
6
6
0
2,
0
3
8
,
5
5
5
1,
7
6
8
,
5
5
5
2,
0
9
4
,
0
8
3
1,
8
1
7
,
3
3
3
2,
1
7
2
,
7
2
4
2,
2
5
4
,
6
4
5
2,
3
3
9
,
9
9
4
2,428,926 2,521,603 2,618,194
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
78
,
0
0
0
45
,
2
9
5
40
,
0
0
0
40
,
0
0
0
30
,
0
0
0
30
,
0
0
0
30
,
7
5
0
31
,
5
1
9
32
,
3
0
7
33,114 33,942 34,791
De
b
t
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
1,
3
9
3
,
9
2
1
1,
3
9
3
,
9
2
4
1,
4
1
5
,
8
1
7
1,
4
1
5
,
8
1
7
1,
4
2
3
,
9
5
1
1,
4
2
3
,
9
5
1
1,
4
2
9
,
4
3
9
1,
4
4
5
,
9
5
6
1,
4
4
6
,
9
2
2
1,475,975 1,382,658 1,404,506
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
s
1,
4
1
7
,
7
8
6
1
,
4
1
4
,
0
3
4
1
,
3
9
6
,
1
1
1
1
,
3
9
6
,
1
1
1
1
,
4
8
6
,
9
7
0
1
,
2
6
6
,
1
8
9
1
,
3
4
9
,
9
6
6
1
,
3
8
7
,
1
5
2
1
,
4
2
5
,
3
9
6
1
,
4
9
4
,
7
2
9
1,535,183 1,576,793
In
t
e
r
f
u
n
d
1
,
0
5
4
,
2
9
6
1
,
1
0
2
,
3
4
6
1
,
1
2
0
,
7
6
1
1
,
1
0
8
,
7
6
3
1
,
1
5
1
,
3
6
2
9
1
4
,
4
8
9
9
3
7
,
3
5
1
9
6
0
,
7
8
5
9
8
4
,
8
0
5
1
,
0
0
9
,
4
2
5
1,034,660 1,060,527
To
t
a
l
E
x
p
e
n
s
e
s
3
3
,
1
5
0
,
1
5
3
3
2
,
8
9
2
,
1
2
0
3
4
,
5
2
0
,
7
2
8
3
3
,
1
1
4
,
3
3
7
3
5
,
7
6
8
,
8
0
8
3
2
,
9
2
3
,
9
4
2
3
4
,
6
3
4
,
8
6
1
3
5
,
8
3
7
,
2
6
5
3
7
,
1
1
2
,
6
0
7
3
8
,
5
1
0
,
6
6
6
39,825,687 41,330,338
En
d
i
n
g
F
u
n
d
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
9
7
7
,
9
5
1
1
,
3
4
1
,
9
7
1
1
,
2
7
3
,
2
6
5
1
,
7
5
3
,
6
1
5
1
,
3
1
0
,
9
8
8
3
,
0
2
6
,
6
7
4
2
,
3
8
8
,
0
6
4
1
,
2
4
4
,
0
8
0
(4
0
2
,
1
2
4
)
(
2
,
6
3
3
,
0
3
5
)
(
5
,
3
4
1
,
7
7
7
)
(
8
,
6
8
4
,
4
0
8
)
-
-
0
-
-
-
-
-
-
- -
Ta
r
g
e
t
E
n
d
i
n
g
F
u
n
d
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
(
1
)
2
,
7
6
2
,
5
1
3
2
,
7
4
1
,
0
1
0
2
,
8
7
6
,
7
2
7
2
,
7
5
9
,
5
2
8
2
,
9
8
0
,
7
3
4
2
,
7
4
3
,
6
6
2
2
,
8
8
6
,
2
3
8
2
,
9
8
6
,
4
3
9
3
,
0
9
2
,
7
1
7
3
,
2
0
9
,
2
2
2
3,318,807 3,444,195
(1
)
G
F
O
A
r
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
e
d
1
m
o
n
t
h
o
f
e
x
p
e
n
d
i
t
u
r
e
s
Wi
t
h
F
i
r
e
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
1
c
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
(
s
e
l
l
a
p
p
a
r
a
t
u
s
a
n
d
e
q
u
i
p
m
e
n
t
,
r
e
t
a
i
n
s
t
a
t
i
o
n
s
,
l
a
n
d
,
a
n
d
t
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
f
e
e
s
)
(2
)
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
F
e
e
s
a
r
e
l
o
c
a
t
e
d
i
n
C
h
g
s
f
o
r
G
o
o
d
s
a
n
d
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
Ex
e
c
u
t
i
v
e
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
-
C
u
r
r
e
n
t
F
o
r
e
c
a
s
t
-
W
i
t
h
F
i
r
e
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
1
c
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
(
s
e
l
l
a
p
p
a
r
a
t
u
s
a
n
d
e
q
u
i
p
m
e
n
t
,
r
e
t
a
i
n
s
t
a
t
i
o
n
s
,
l
a
n
d
,
a
n
d
t
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
f
e
e
s
)
R:
\
S
t
r
a
t
e
g
i
c
M
o
d
e
l
s
\
E
D
S
T
R
A
T
W
o
r
k
i
n
g
-
L
H
.
x
l
s
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
10/16/2009 12:47 PM
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
22
5
of
22
5