2009.12.01 CC Agenda Packet
AGENDA
Edmonds City Council
Council Chambers, Public Safety Complex
250 5th Ave. North, Edmonds
______________________________________________________________
DECEMBER 1, 2009
6:15 p.m. - Executive Session: Legal matter regarding pending or threatened litigation.
7:00 p.m. - Call to Order and Flag Salute
1. Approval of Agenda
2. Approval of Consent Agenda Items
A. Roll Call
B. AM-2626 Approval of City Council Meeting Minutes of November 17, 2009.
C. AM-2627 Approval of claim checks #115435 through #115583 dated November 19, 2009 for
$1,428,904.30. Approval of payroll direct deposits and checks #48754 through #48789 for
the pay period November 1, through November 15, 2009 for $844,394.67.
D. AM-2617 Acknowledge receipt of Claims for Damages from Douglas Hall (amount undetermined),
Ricky Arntsen (Claim No. 2, amount undetermined), and Timothy J. Glass (amount
undetermined).
E. AM-2619 Approval of list of businesses applying for renewal of their liquor licenses with the
Washington State Liquor Control Board, November 2009.
F. AM-2588 Authorization for the Mayor to sign the 2010 Employment Contract with Jana Spellman,
Senior Executive Council Assistant.
G. AM-2635 Authorization for Mayor to sign a contract for services with the Cascade Land Conservancy
to become a "Cascade Agenda Leadership City."
H. AM-2633 Authorization for Mayor to sign a contract for services with Sustainable Edmonds.
3. AM-2618
(20 Minutes)
Presentation by WSDOT Ferries Division Assistant Secretary David Mosley - Update on
Vehicle Reservations Pre-Design Study.
4. AM-2628
(15 Minutes)
Annual Report - Hearing Examiner
5. AM-2629
(15 Minutes)
Annual Report - Prosecutor
6. AM-2631
(45 Minutes)
Report from the City Attorney regarding the Thuesen subdivision, alley way vacation
and Reidy enforcement action.
Packet Page 1 of 253
7. AM-2622
(30 Minutes)
Public Hearing on Capital Facilities Plan Element update for 2010 – 2015 to City’s
Comprehensive Plan. The proposal updates the city's capital facilities plan to include
improvements, additions, upgrades or extensions of City infrastructure such as
transportation, parks, storm water, sewer, and water systems along with other public
facilities necessary to implement the City's Comprehensive Plan; incorporates projects
from the recently updated Transportation and Parks Plan Elements; and, separates the
maintenance, replacement and preservation projects from the Capital Facilities Plan
Element and into a separate capital improvements plan.
8. AM-2593
(20 Minutes)
Public hearing on a proposed Rezone (File #PLN20090019) to change the zoning
designation from Multiple Residential (RM-2.4) to Single-Family Residential (RS-8)
along a portion of 215th Street SW. All properties were subject to a Comprehensive
Plan amendment that was approved last year (File #AMD20070014).
9.Audience Comments (3 minute limit per person)*
*Regarding matters not listed on the Agenda as Closed Record Review or as Public Hearings.
10. AM-2630
(15 Minutes)
Annual Report - City Attorney
11. (5 Minutes)Mayor's Comments
12. (15 Minutes)Council Comments
Adjourn
Packet Page 2 of 253
AM-2626 2.B.
Approve 11-17-09 City Council Meeting Minutes
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:12/01/2009
Submitted By:Sandy Chase Time:Consent
Department:City Clerk's Office Type:Action
Review Committee:
Committee Action:
Information
Subject Title
Approval of City Council Meeting Minutes of November 17, 2009.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
It is recommended that the City Council review and approve the draft minutes.
Previous Council Action
N/A
Narrative
Attached is a copy of the draft minutes.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: 11-17-09 Draft City Council Minutes
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 11/19/2009 03:09 PM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 11/19/2009 05:22 PM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 11/20/2009 08:38 AM APRV
Form Started By: Sandy
Chase
Started On: 11/19/2009 03:08
PM
Final Approval Date: 11/20/2009
Packet Page 3 of 253
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
November 17, 2009
Page 1
EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL DRAFT MINUTES
November 17, 2009
The Edmonds City Council meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Mayor Haakenson in the Council
Chambers, 250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds. The meeting was opened with the flag salute.
ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT
Gary Haakenson, Mayor
D. J. Wilson, Council President
Michael Plunkett, Councilmember
Steve Bernheim, Councilmember
Dave Orvis, Councilmember
Ron Wambolt, Councilmember
Strom Peterson, Councilmember
STAFF PRESENT
Mark Correira, Assistant Fire Chief
Gerry Gannon, Assistant Police Chief
Stephen Clifton, Community Services/Economic
Development Director
Noel Miller, Public Works Director
Lorenzo Hines, Finance Director
Rob Chave, Planning Manager
Ann Bullis, Building Official
Bio Park, City Attorney
Sandy Chase, City Clerk
Jana Spellman, Senior Executive Council Asst.
Jeannie Dines, Recorder
Mayor Haakenson commented the City lost a good friend in the recent passing of Councilmember Peggy
Pritchard Olson. A memorial service will be held November 18 at 2:00 p.m. at Edmonds Center for the
Arts. Following a moment of silence to remember Ms. Olson and her family, Mayor Haakenson
summarized Ms. Olson would be missed.
1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Mayor Haakenson requested the addition of a 15-minute Executive Session regarding a legal matter to
begin at 8:00 p.m. as one of the attorneys would be participating by phone.
COUNCILMEMBER WAMBOLT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PLUNKETT,
TO APPROVE THE AGENDA AS AMENDED. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
2. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS
Mayor Haakenson requested Item K be removed from the Consent Agenda.
COUNCILMEMBER PLUNKETT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER WAMBOLT,
TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA WITH THE EXCEPTION OF ITEM K. MOTION
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. The agenda items approved are as follows:
A. ROLL CALL
B. APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 2, 2009.
C. APPROVAL OF CLAIM CHECKS #115133 THROUGH #115315 DATED NOVEMBER 5,
2009 FOR $884,683.70, AND #115316 THROUGH #115434 DATED NOVEMBER 12, 2009
FOR $217,299.66. APPROVAL OF PAYROLL DIRECT DEPOSIT AND CHECKS #48714
THROUGH #48753 FOR THE PAY PERIOD OCTOBER 16 THROUGH OCTOBER 31,
2009 FOR $806,065.43.
Packet Page 4 of 253
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
November 17, 2009
Page 2
D. ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT OF CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES FROM BOB HOVDE
($2,563.70), MARK J. JOHNSON ($5,313.69), RICKY ARNTSEN (AMOUNT
UNDETERMINED), AND SON NGUYEN ($1,500.00).
E. AUTHORIZATION FOR MAYOR TO SIGN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACTS
FOR BUILDING CODE PLAN REVIEW WITH EAGLE EYE CONSULTING
ENGINEERS, INC., SCBC ENGINEERING, PLLC, AND CG ENGINEERING, PLLC.
F. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF TERMINATION OF THE ESPERANCE AGREEMENT FOR
FIRE AND EMS SERVICES EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2010.
G. CONTRACT FOR JAIL SERVICES WITH SNOHOMISH COUNTY SHERIFF'S
OFFICE.
H. CONTRACT WITH THE S. MORRIS COMPANY FOR ANIMAL DISPOSAL SERVICES.
I. RENEWING THE TOWING CONTRACT WITH PAULSON'S TOWING, R&R STAR
TOWING, SHANNON TOWING, AND WALLY'S TOWING.
J. AUTHORIZATION TO SURPLUS ONE (1) SEWER TV TRUCK UTILIZING A SEALED
BID PROCESS.
L. ORDINANCE NO. 3762 – REPEALING THE PROVISIONS OF EDMONDS CITY CODE
2.10.040, FIRE CHIEF, ADDING A NEW CHAPTER 2.12 RELATING TO THE DUTIES
OF THE FIRE CHIEF, FIRE MARSHAL AND OTHER REFERENCES TO THE FIRE
DEPARTMENT THROUGHOUT THE CITY CODE, REPEALING CHAPTER 3.09 AND
3.15 AND PROVIDING FOR DISPOSITION OF THE FUNDS HELD.
ITEM K: ORDINANCE NO. 3761 – REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 3706 CODIFIED AS
CHAPTER 5.65 OF THE EDMONDS CITY CODE, AND ENTITLED EMERGENCY
MEDICAL SERVICE TRANSPORT FEE CHARGES, PROVIDING FOR COLLECTION
OF FEES INCURRED.
Mayor Haakenson explained the effective date in Section 2 needed to be changed from five days after
passage of the ordinance to January 1, 2010.
COUNCILMEMBER BERNHEIM MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER WAMBOLT,
FOR APPROVAL OF ITEM K AS AMENDED. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
3. APPROVING TRANSFER OF CONTROL OF THE FRANCHISEE (VERIZON NORTHWEST,
INC.) TO FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION. (PUBLIC COMMENT WILL BE
RECEIVED.)
Community Services/Economic Development Director Stephen Clifton explained the Council packet
included three items not contained in the packet for the November 2 workshop: an email from Elana
Zana, Ogden Murphy Wallace, dated November 3, 2009; a letter to the consortium from Stole Rives dated
November 6, 2009 and a memorandum from Peter Camp to the Snohomish County Council dated
November 6, 2009. Public comment will be accepted at this public meeting and this item is intended as a
follow-up to the November 2, 2009 workshop.
Mr. Clifton reviewed the history of the transfer:
August, 2008 - City authorized and granted a Franchise Agreement to Verizon Northwest Inc.
May 13, 2009 - Verizon announced plans to divest its local wireline communications system to
Frontier Communications Corporation
May 19, 2009 - City received a Request for Transfer of Control (Verizon to Frontier)
Packet Page 5 of 253
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
November 17, 2009
Page 3
Set in motion certain federal requirements and deadlines:
o City (Franchise Authority) has 30 days in which to review Form 394 to determine whether all
necessary information has been provided and is complete
o City Council has 120 days to take action on request
o Determine if the Transferee is legally, technically, and financially capable to operate a
Franchise
June, 2009 – A Multi-Jurisdictional Consortium was formed
o Share in legal and technical expertise to analyze transfer of the franchise
o Edmonds City Council authorized contracting with River Oaks Communications Corporation
and Ogden Murphy Wallace. The Council packet contains an August 21, 2009 report from
Ogden Murphy Wallace and a template transfer ordinance.
Consortium requested and reviewed extensive legal, technical and financial information from
Verizon Northwest and Frontier Communications Corporation
Due to the amount of information under review, the decision deadline was extended to November
30, 2009
Under the transfer:
Frontier Communications Corporation will acquire Verizon NW Inc.
Control of Cable Franchisee will transfer from Verizon Communications to Frontier
Communications Corporation
Completion of the transaction is expected in April 2010
The local jurisdiction’s request to transfer control of cable franchise is one piece of the
transaction
Awaiting authorization from local, state and federal regulatory authorities
He provided facts related to financing of the transaction:
Total Cost of Transactions $8.6 billion
o Financed through transfer of stock and debt issuance
o Sell unsecured notes, less than 9.5% interest
Transfer does not include increasing cable rates to the customers; subject to future changes based
on market conditions
Mr. Clifton explained franchise commitments and obligations will be met by Frontier Communications
Corporation. All terms in the Franchise Agreement will remain the same including calculation of gross
revenues as well as build out requirements. Installation of fiber within the City is more than 85%
complete. Government and education channels will be provided at no cost to the City and School
District; Edmonds government channel is currently Verizon channel 39 and the education channel is 38.
Mr. Clifton reviewed Frontier’s commitment to customer service:
Appoint multiple General Managers within Washington State
Empower local supervisors and general managers with authority to resolve issues to the
customer’s satisfaction
Maintain Call and Customer Dispatch Center in Everett
Retain most Verizon customer service personnel
Hire additional personnel to handle customer service
With regard to Frontier’s technical capabilities:
Signals will be transported from Florida to Illinois
A transport network will be launched from Illinois to Indiana
From Indiana the signal will be transported to Washington and Oregon
o Lease existing transport capacity from third party providers
Packet Page 6 of 253
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
November 17, 2009
Page 4
o Configure network-install off the shelf equipment to transport video
Retain most Verizon personnel
Unknowns include the following:
Programming: Process of securing content agreements is still being completed
Although Frontier is determined to make this transaction successful, risks include:
o Transport and content agreements are not for the length of franchise agreement
o Frontier has not secured financing
Frontier Communications Shareholders Approve Acquisition of Verizon Wireline Operations in
14 States
Could scale back business or cease business
No guarantees
Frontier does not currently operate a cable system
The Consortium and the City Attorney’s Office recommend the following:
Consent be given to the transfer of control of Verizon Northwest Inc. to Frontier subject to a
mutually acceptable Transfer Resolution or Ordinance
o Frontier’s and Verizon Northwest Inc.’s responsibility to make this transfer of control and
acquisition successful from a business, technical, financial and customer standpoint.
o By consenting to the transfer of control, local governments are not opining as to whether
Frontier will ultimately be successful from a financial, technical or business standpoint.
Mr. Clifton pointed out the proposed ordinance states if approval is not granted by state or federal, the
City Council’s approval is void. He pointed out although the Washington Utility Transportation
Commission staff recommended not approving the franchise agreement, they recommended approving the
telephone lines but not the cable franchise. He introduced representatives from Verizon and Frontier who
were present to answer questions.
Mayor Haakenson opened the public participation portion of the public hearing. There were no members
of the audience present who wished to provide testimony and Mayor Haakenson closed the public
hearing.
COUNCIL PRESIDENT WILSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER WAMBOLT,
FOR APPROVAL OF ORDINANCE NO. 3763 – APPROVING TRANSFER OF CONTROL OF
THE FRANCHISEE (VERIZON NORTHWEST, INC.) TO FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS
CORPORATION. MOTION CARRIED (5-0). Councilmember Orvis was not present for the vote.
4. PUBLIC HEARING: (1) RESOLUTION FINDING THE EXISTENCE OF SUBSTANTIAL NEED
AND JUSTIFYING INCREASING THE PROPERTY TAX LEVY FOR THE CITY REGULAR
PROPERTY TAX AND EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICE LEVIES FOR 2010 AT A RATE OF
1.0% OVER THE PREVIOUS YEAR.
(2) ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE ANNUAL TAX LEVY BY INCREASING THE
REGULAR PROPERTY TAX LEVY BY THE CURRENT 101% LEVY LIMIT, THEREBY
LEVYING AN ESTIMATED REGULAR PROPERTY TAX LEVY OF $9,383,000, EMS LEVY OF
$3,911,000 AND LEVYING $853,084 FOR VOTED INDEBTEDNESS FOR THE PUBLIC SAFETY
COMPLEX
Mayor Haakenson explained this increase would generate an additional $140,000.
Finance Director Lorenzo Hines explained State law allows for an increase in property tax of 101% or
100% plus or minus inflation. This year’s inflation rate as calculated by Snohomish County is 0.848%.
Packet Page 7 of 253
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
November 17, 2009
Page 5
With the passage of a Resolution of Substantial Need, the City can levy 101%. The substantial need is
based on lack of sales tax and projected continued lower rates of sales tax generation.
Mayor Haakenson opened the public participation portion of the public hearing. There were no members
of the audience present who wished to provide testimony and Mayor Haakenson closed the public
hearing.
COUNCILMEMBER WAMBOLT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PLUNKETT,
FOR APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION NO. 1211 – FINDING THE EXISTENCE OF
SUBSTANTIAL NEED AND JUSTIFYING INCREASING THE PROPERTY TAX LEVY FOR
THE CITY REGULAR PROPERTY TAX AND EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICE LEVIES
FOR 2010 AT A RATE OF 1.0% OVER THE PREVIOUS YEAR.
Council President Wilson referred to Section 2 of the resolution which states the resolution was enacted
by a majority vote plus one of the Council. City Attorney Bio Park responded a super-majority of the
Council was required for this resolution.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
COUNCILMEMBER WAMBOLT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PLUNKETT,
FOR APPROVAL OF ORDINANCE NO. 3764 – PROVIDING FOR THE ANNUAL TAX LEVY
BY INCREASING THE REGULAR PROPERTY TAX LEVY BY THE CURRENT 101% LEVY
LIMIT, THEREBY LEVYING AN ESTIMATED REGULAR PROPERTY TAX LEVY OF
$9,383,000, EMS LEVY OF $3,911,000 AND LEVYING $853,084 FOR VOTED INDEBTEDNESS
FOR THE PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
5. PUBLIC HEARING ON THE COMMUNITY SUSTAINABILITY ELEMENT OF THE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
THE DRAFT COMMUNITY SUSTAINABILITY ELEMENT IS BEING PROPOSED AS A NEW
ADDITION TO THE EDMONDS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. SUSTAINABILITY IS DEFINED AS
THE ABILITY TO “MEET THE NEEDS OF THE PRESENT WITHOUT COMPROMISING THE
ABILITY OF FUTURE GENERATIONS TO MEET THEIR OWN NEEDS.” THE SUSTAINABILITY
ELEMENT WILL ESTABLISH A FRAMEWORK FOR LINKING LONG-RANGE CITY GOALS TO
MID-RANGE STRATEGIC PLANNING AND SHORT-TERM DECISION-MAKING (INCLUDING
CITY BUDGETS AND PROGRAMS) AND WILL ADDRESS BROAD SUSTAINABILITY POLICY
ISSUES WHILE EMPHASIZING THE IMPORTANCE OF ADDRESSING CLIMATE CHANGE,
COMMUNITY HEALTH, AND ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY. THE CITY COUNCIL HAS
ADOPTED A NUMBER OF RESOLUTIONS EMPHASIZING VARIOUS ASPECTS OF
SUSTAINABILITY AND RESPONSES TO POTENTIAL IMPACTS FROM CLIMATE CHANGE. THE
COMMUNITY SUSTAINABILITY ELEMENT IS INTENDED TO BE THE NEXT STEP IN
INTEGRATING THESE EFFORTS INTO LOCAL PLANS AND DECISION-MAKING.
Planning Manager Rob Chave explained the City’s Comprehensive Plan contains several elements, most
are required by the GMA; this element is not required. He explained this element was the result of
several Council discussions and resolutions as well as the Mayor’s Climate Protection Committee. The
Planning Board has had several presentations and discussions regarding this element as well as met with
the Economic Development Commission. This element addresses broad sustainability issues and
provides a framework for future planning. He envisioned the Sustainability Element would be used to
focus and review Comprehensive Plan amendments/updates for consistency. He explained 2010 and
2011 would be key years for City planning as a mandatory 7-year update is due in 2011. As part of that
update, the City will be considering the Puget Sound Regional Council’s update to Vision 2040, a
regional planning effort also considered sustainability, climate change, etc. This element is the first step
in integrating these issues into local plans.
Packet Page 8 of 253
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
November 17, 2009
Page 6
Mayor Haakenson opened the public participation portion of the public hearing. There were no members
of the audience present who wished to provide testimony and Mayor Haakenson closed the public
hearing.
COUNCILMEMBER BERNHEIM MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PETERSON,
TO APPROVE THE DRAFT COMMUNITY SUSTAINABILITY ELEMENT AND DIRECT THE
CITY ATTORNEY TO PREPARE AN ORDINANCE TO ADOPT THE ELEMENT AS PART OF
THE CITY OF EDMONDS’ COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
Council President Wilson asked Mr. Chave whether there were any weaknesses in this element. Mr.
Chave answered the weakness or next step would be including detail in the element. As staff updates
various plans, they will need to be measured against the goals and policies in the Community
Sustainability Element to ensure consistency. The City will also need to pay more attention during
budgeting and day-to-day decisions to ensure consistency with strategic planning as well as ensure that
current and short term decisions were still achieving longer range, 25-30 year, comprehensive planning
visions. In the past strategic planning has been done but the more difficult work of revisiting/modifying
the strategic plan each year has not been accomplished.
Council President Wilson commented most of the details would be the result of reviewing other elements.
Mr. Chave agreed, recommending the Council’s annual retreat focus on strategic goals for the current as
well as succeeding years. Further, when considering codes and ordinances, keep in mind how they relate
to the overall economic development goals, strategic planning, etc. The Strategic Plan should be
reevaluated and updated each year.
Councilmember Bernheim commented on economic change that will be necessary for the City to be more
economically and environmentally sustainable in the future. He referred to the statement, adopt a system
of codes, standards that promote development that achieves growth management goals while maintaining
our community character, employing low impact development, transit oriented development, unique
streets, etc., noting this provided a balance between high intensity urban development and maintaining the
City’s unique charm. He remarked the objective should not be to refine the plan each year but to
accomplish the goals in the plan such as reducing emissions, improving buildings’ efficiency, etc.
Councilmember Plunkett commented the performing arts center became a reality because the
Comprehensive Plan specifically made reference to a performing arts center. When a project with a hotel
and a convention center via a public/private partnership was discussed, it changed into a performing arts
center because the Comprehensive Plan did not mention a convention center. He summarized it will be
up to future Councils to apply the goals in this element.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Mr. Chave advised the City Attorney would draft the ordinance for approval on a future Consent Agenda.
6. AUDIENCE COMMENTS
Brian Goodnight, Edmonds, commented on the rooflines in the multi family zone, noting many of the
buildings constructed in Edmonds during the past 10-15 years have inverted rooflines with drainage in the
center. However, none of the recently constructed buildings meet the code due to the cricket in the center
of the inverted roofline that is used to direct water to the side. With regard to the 25-foot height
restriction, he pointed out ceilings have gotten taller and floor assemblies wider, but the height limit has
not increased. He pointed out the inverted roofline did not benefit the consumer, noting the drain in the
center of Old Mill Town was leaking into the building. With regard to zoning, he suggested several
Packet Page 9 of 253
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
November 17, 2009
Page 7
parcels between 76th & 80th north of 220th could be rezoned from residential to multi family such as RM
2.4 due to the busy street, bus line, and proximity to shopping. He also suggested rezoning the area
downtown on Dayton above 6th. Mayor Haakenson suggested he submit his suggestions in writing to
each Councilmember.
Lora Petso, Edmonds, explained although the City had two REET funds, only one could be used for
park purchases. She pointed out the City’s ability to purchase land had been eroded by funding non-real
estate items from the fund that is allowed to be used for real estate and suggested the Council move
capital projects such as the library roof and the Frances Anderson Center seismic upgrade to the other
REET fund. She provided scenarios that would allow the City to purchase the Skipper’s and/or Sherwood
Park property. She urged the Council to keep in mind that property values and bond costs were at historic
lows and it would be an opportune time for the City to act. She questioned the difference in the fund
balance in the 2008 Park Plan and the 2009-2010 budget.
Dave Page, Edmonds, congratulated Councilmembers Plunkett and Peterson for their success in the
election and commended Councilmember Wambolt for his excellent service.
Roger Hertrich, Edmonds, referred to Item 2C (Approval of Claim Checks and Approval of Payroll
Direct Deposit and Checks), commenting Lora Petso received and cashed an $800 check before the
Council had approved the list. Next, he congratulated Ms. Petso for winning her lawsuit against the City
and suggested the Council not appeal that decision. With regard to the Sustainability Element, he
commented it contained a lot of words but none of it was simple or understandable. He referred to
comments in the Element regarding encouraging land use patterns that facilitate use of transit,
commenting many would not like the look of the city with that land use pattern. He referred to statements
in the element regarding redevelopment that enhances Edmonds’ character and charm which he
interpreted to mean retaining building heights. With regard to transit-oriented development, he feared
that was what Al Dykes had in mind for the old Safeway property. He suggested the Sustainability
Element could be replaced with only a few sentences.
Diane Buckshnis, Edmonds, recognized Kevin Meyers, an eighth grader at Holy Rosary, who spent 10
hours with his parents picking up yard signs.
In response to Mr. Hertrich’s comment that Ms. Petso won her lawsuit against the City, Mayor
Haakenson clarified Ms. Petso sued the City on 40 counts; she won 3 counts and the City won 37.
Councilmember Bernheim pointed out the decision of the Edmonds Hearing Examiner was reversed and
the permit granting the housing development was reversed, therefore, the City lost.
Councilmember Plunkett inquired about Ms. Petso receiving and cashing a check from the City before the
Council had approved the warrants. Mayor Haakenson explained it was standard practice during a week
the Council did not meet for the warrants to be approved the subsequent week. Finance Director Lorenzo
Hines commented the Council did not meet last week and the City needed to pay its vendors. The checks
were issued with the understanding they would be subsequently approved by the Council. He assured that
process had been in place prior to his arrival and had been the practice of this and prior Councils.
Councilmember Plunkett expressed concern with that process.
Councilmember Wambolt questioned why the Council would approve a check in the amount of $800
when the Mayor could approve expenditures up to $30,000. Mayor Haakenson responded the Council
approves all the warrants; it is the Council President’s responsibility to review the warrants in detail.
Council President Wilson commented as a small business owner, if his wife who is also his business
partner is out of town, his employees must still be paid. The Council reviews the checks but does not
Packet Page 10 of 253
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
November 17, 2009
Page 8
actually write the checks. He did not want the City to neglect paying its employees simply because the
Council had not reviewed and approved the checks. Mayor Haakenson agreed he had the ability to sign
checks without Council approval of up to $30,000; however, all the checks the City issues are presented
to the Council for review in the form of claim checks and payroll.
Councilmember Plunkett requested this be added as a topic on the Council’s retreat agenda.
Mayor Haakenson explained it was the Council President’s responsibility to review the checks; the detail
was not provided to Councilmembers unless requested. Council President Wilson commented he was not
informed of that responsibility by the previous Council President.
EXECUTIVE SESSION REGARDING A LEGAL MATTER.
At 7:50 p.m., Mayor Haakenson recessed the Council to a 10-minute break, followed by a 15-minute
Executive Session at 8:00 p.m. regarding a legal matter. The Executive Session was extended twice for
10 minutes each and the meeting reconvened at 8:37 p.m.
COUNCILMEMBER BERNHEIM MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER ORVIS,
THAT THE CITY NOT APPEAL THE PETSO V. CITY OF EDMONDS LITIGATION.
Councilmember Bernheim commented the City will benefit for appellant review if it occurs; if not, the
application has been reversed by the Superior Court and it will return to the process. He pointed out a
great deal of money had been spent on litigation and he did not see any advantage in continuing.
MOTION CARRIED (5-0-1), COUNCILMEMBER WAMBOLT ABSTAINED.
Councilmember Wambolt explained he abstained because this was something that would be ongoing in
the future and he would not be on the Council in the future; therefore, he preferred not to vote.
7. CONTINUED DISCUSSION ON ROOF DESIGN STANDARDS.
Councilmember Bernheim explained Planning Manager Rob Chave, Building Official Ann Bullis and
Council President Wilson worked together to develop the agenda memo. He summarized the problem
was the definition of roof: roof only may exceed 25 feet if certain conditions are met. He referred to Mr.
Goodnight’s comments that the code requires an engineering design that developers, left to their own
devices, would never do. He commented the 25 + 5 language in the code that allows the roof only to
exceed 25 feet is highly ambiguous and is found in 5-6 different areas of the code. He suggested there
were four options:
1) Change the code to a flat building height limit.
2) Allow a certain volume for the roof area above the height limit, such as 33% above the height
limit could be used for the roof.
3) A different kind of code - for example in the BD1 zone a 2-3 story approach versus a 25 or 30
foot height limit.
4) Form-based code which allows less room for interpretation. The example he cited had a height
limit of 2½ stories, 2 stories for the building and ½ story for the roof.
He explained there was also the potential to have University of Washington Planning School assist the
City with this effort. He summarized the City should not have a code that required an inverted roof. He
suggested adding this to the retreat agenda.
Mr. Chave complimented Councilmember Bernheim on the creative ideas he proposed. He was most
intrigued by a form-based code, noting that was already contained in the City’s codes and provided
Packet Page 11 of 253
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
November 17, 2009
Page 9
potentially the best way to deal with design issues. He pointed out people primarily care about building
design rather than the height; the fourth option provides the best way to address design on a district-by-
district or neighborhood-by-neighborhood approach. He contacted the University of Washington and
learned the City could utilize the service of a group of graduate students with a graduate advisor, a person
he knows who was previously a planning consultant for a major firm, at a very reasonable cost. If the
Council was interested in utilizing their services, he urged them to consider it soon to allow the cost to be
included in next year’s budget and work program. He estimated the cost to be $20,000 for 3-6 months of
work which he noted would be considerably less than a consultant study. He suggested trying the form-
based approach on 1-2 districts the Council selected and if it worked, use it as a pattern in other areas.
Council President Wilson complimented the efforts of Mr. Chave, Ms. Bullis and Councilmember
Bernheim. He recalled many of these questions have been raised previously and he hoped to resolve the
issue of roofs and the appearance of the downtown commercial area for the foreseeable future.
Councilmember Bernheim responded there were two issues; the first was the roof crisis. He was
uncomfortable continuing to ignore the roof only language in the code in the RM zone. A second issue is
the appearance of downtown which is a related but different issue. He preferred to pursue the roof issue
immediately. Council President Wilson pointed out all four options had implications on the appearance
of downtown.
Councilmember Wambolt commented he hated to see the Council spend time and money on this issue
next year as it was essentially a non-issue. He agreed buildings were not matching the code; the solution
was to tweak the code. He explained the height limit was originally 25 feet and the result was flat roof
buildings because builders wanted to maximize the living space. Mr. Chave clarified building heights
were significantly higher historically and had steadily been reduced. Although the discussion was in
regard to a 25-foot height limit, a 25-foot height limit was never in the code. The 25 + 5 height limit was
developed as a result of discussion regarding a 25-foot height limit. He summarized the height was
reduced from 35 feet to 25 + 5. Councilmember Wambolt recalled the additional 5 feet was only to be
allowed for a modulated or pitched roof. Mr. Chave agreed it was for a 4-in-12 roof.
Councilmember Wambolt commented many buildings had been constructed exactly like the 523 Alder
building that raised this issue. The concern with that building was the obstruction of the residences’
views in the building to the east. He noted no one had previously complained about the roofs design;
there were many similar designs throughout downtown including his own condominium building. The
buildings looks like a modulated roof from the street but are flat on top similar to the new yacht club
building. If the intent was to avoid buildings with flat roofs as viewed from the street, simply adding the
words street visible roof above 25 feet needs to have a certain pitch such as 4-in-12 would solve the
problem. The code would then match what was being constructed.
Councilmember Plunkett asked whether there had been any complaints regarding the streetscape of
buildings constructed with a cricket prior to construction of the 523 Alder building. Mr. Chave answered
there were no complaints about the streetscape, roof or any other aspects. Councilmember Plunkett
explained the complaint arose due to the realization that staff’s interpretation of the code was not as well
aligned as it could have been. Mr. Chave responded 523 Alder highlighted that the way the code had
been applied over the years was not consistent with the plain meaning. He commented the interpretations
had been made by Council, ADB, and staff.
Councilmember Plunkett asked whether builders complained about the roof design. Mr. Chave
commented there were no complaints voiced at the ADB and he did not recall any developers
complaining about the way staff was interpreting the code. Councilmember Plunkett commented the
crickets create view corridor which some other options did not. He suggested a fifth option to better
aligning the code with the way buildings have been constructed which would, 1) create view corridors, 2)
Packet Page 12 of 253
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
November 17, 2009
Page 10
provide an acceptable streetscape, and 3) create buildings that are more affordable. Mr. Chave agreed
recognizing existing practice could be an option.
Mr. Chave explained the Council could adopt an interim rule that formalized the current practice in the
code and also considered a formed-based approach via working with the University of Washington
students to develop a longer term fix that would resolve neighborhood character issues that simple roof
regulations did not address. Councilmember Plunkett pointed out the post-523 Alder scheme may
eliminate views. When the City took the post-523 Alder position, staff held the builder to a new
interpretation that actually further reduced views. Mr. Chave clarified the builder’s solution to the
problem made the views worse for the neighbors.
Councilmember Plunkett clarified the City could adopt a pre-523 Alder ordinance while other options
were considered. Without an interim ordinance, the post-523 Alder scheme may further eliminate views.
Council President Wilson commented the Council stumbled upon the fact that the City had been illegally
permitting buildings for the past 15-20 years because of a misunderstanding and an interpretation that was
made when an interpretation was not necessary. He explained a cricket did not create view corridors; it
was a runoff feature of one inch per foot. He agreed this was an appropriate item to discuss at the Council
retreat.
Councilmember Plunkett asked if the City was acting illegally when buildings over the past 15-20 years
were permitted. Mr. Chave answered there had been some creep over time, since the mid-1980s, in the
way the rules were interpreted which ultimately resulted in buildings that did not meet the letter of the
code.
Councilmember Bernheim commented the City’s code required a roof slope of 4-in-12 above the height
limit. He illustrated in the past that was a 4-in-12 pitch but in later years had evolved into an inverted 4-
in-12 slope on the top and the sides of buildings. The result was the building appeared from the street to
have a flat roof such as the 523 Alder building. If the Council wished, that could be accomplished via his
first option, a flat height limit. He noted although an inverted roof created beautiful living spaces, it also
resulted in drainage into the center of the building. With a flat height limit, flat roofs would be allowed
and they would be better engineered.
Councilmember Orvis commented the new roof type was a lean-to roof that from the outside appears to
be a 30-foot flat roof. Builders no longer start the roof at the edge of the building but start the roof at 30
feet and go down, a design he recommended be changed. If the Council wanted to avoid flat roofs at 30
feet, the code needed to state the roof starts at 25 feet and goes up. With regard to 523 Alder, he noted the
views from the adjacent building had been eliminated and he questioned how the builder could have made
it worse when attempting to correct the problem.
Councilmember Wambolt pointed out the 523 Alder building was not legal; there was nothing in the code
that allowed the roof to begin at 30 feet and go down. Most of the other buildings appear to have a
pitched roof that starts at 25 feet and goes up. He reiterated his suggestion to modify the code to reflect
the current practice.
Council President Wilson asked the legal status of the building at 523 Alder. Mr. Chave answered it was
permitted and under construction. As approved today, it met the code. He explained the code does not
state the roof must start at 25 feet at the edge and go up to 30 in the middle; it states starts at 25 and go up
to 30. Starting in the middle and moving out to 30 was not precluded by the code. The goal was to make
the language lead more specifically to the intent which could be done in stages via an interim ordinance.
Packet Page 13 of 253
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
November 17, 2009
Page 11
Councilmember Bernheim responded it was the roof only that was above 25 feet and the large bay
windows between 25 and 30 feet were not part of the roof. He commented if this building was his
neighbor, he would likely be in litigation. Mr. Chave responded staff discussed it with the City Attorney
and followed his advice that it met the code.
Councilmember Wambolt pointed out if the building did not comply with the code, it had been approved
by the City. The developer did not construct a building without approval. Councilmember Bernheim
recalled the developer’s plans were approved and he intentionally deviated from those plans.
8. INITIAL DISCUSSION OF CAMPAIGN FINANCE LIMITS.
Councilmember Bernheim suggested for Council and Mayor elections in the City, individuals’ maximum
contribution to a single candidate be limited to $750 per election cycle. He suggested this because he
foresaw mega-contributions to City Council and Mayor elections when there was a hot issue or a great
deal of money at stake. He anticipated $5,000 - $10,000 contributions to a City Council race could buy
an election, not because of corruption but because of the media-buys that such contributions would allow.
His suggestion was that no candidate shall accept or receive during the election cycle campaign
contributions totaling more than $750 from any person. Companies and partnership could continue to
contribute; couples and their children could contribute $750 each. He proposed a limit on donations
because expenditures were getting out of hand and because it would open the opportunity to more people.
Limiting donations would allow candidates to compete on issues rather than for campaign donations.
Councilmember Bernheim encouraged the Council to consider his proposal and suggested scheduling it
on a future agenda for public comment. If the Council adopted this proposed campaign finance limits,
Edmonds would be one of only a few cities in the country with reasonable limits on increasingly
outrageous campaign expenditures.
Councilmember Orvis inquired about federal limits. Councilmember Bernheim responded the maximum
contribution for a presidential race was $2500 per election.
Councilmember Plunkett asked whether the limitation per election cycle would allow donations for the
primary and general election. Councilmember Bernheim responded the election cycle was the entire time
from announcement of candidacy to final Public Disclosure Commission (PDC) reporting.
Council President Wilson commented every year Washington State and the PDC were rated as the most
transparent political financing model in the United States with regard to usability and availability of
public information. People use the information provided by the PDC for election purposes; therefore the
public would learn of any candidate that accepted large donations. He commented $750 per election
cycle would be one of the most restrictive limits in the United States and would limit candidates’ ability
to raise money and potentially open races to self-financing for which there was no counter-balance. He
agreed with discussing whether there was an appropriate limit but felt a $750 limit was not appropriate.
Councilmember Peterson referred to comments that campaigns in Edmonds were very expensive,
explaining one of the reasons may be because so many Edmonds citizens vote, 60% voted this year.
Snohomish County’s average was 45-50%. Campaigns are expensive because candidates need to reach
all those voters; limiting campaign contributions would limit candidates’ ability to reach a very educated,
enthusiastic electorate. He agreed an unlimited amount may not be appropriate but all donations must be
reported to the PDC and Edmonds voters have availed themselves of that information in the past.
Councilmember Plunkett commented he supported in general a contribution limit, envisioning it would
require candidates to spend less time raising money and send out less mail and spend more time in the
neighborhoods talking to citizens.
Packet Page 14 of 253
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
November 17, 2009
Page 12
Councilmember Orvis commented it appeared the Council was generally in agreement with some limit on
contributions but the specific amount was uncertain. He asked about Seattle’s limits. Councilmember
Bernheim answered Seattle’s limit per election was $700.
Councilmember Bernheim commented he was interested in hearing from citizens regarding this issue.
Under his proposal, there would be no limitations on a candidate’s own resources or the value of
volunteer services.
City Attorney Bio Park clarified there was a difference between campaign contributions and campaign
expenditures; prohibiting campaign expenditures was illegal. To his knowledge in Western Washington,
only King County, Seattle and Issaquah had campaign contribution limits.
Council President Wilson pointed out campaign contribution limits would not limit expenditures and
would take away the candidate’s voice which results in negative campaigning.
9. REPORT ON CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETINGS OF NOVEMBER 10, 2009.
Community Services/Development Services Committee
Councilmember Orvis reported staff provided the Committee an update on the construction of sewer
improvements for 13 properties as part of the Olympic View Drive improvement project. Several
properties will be assessed a sewer connection charge at the time improvements are made, others will be
deferred until further improvements are made. This item will be presented to the full Council at a public
hearing. The Committee also discussed bikini barista stands regulations.
Finance Committee
Councilmember Wambolt summarized items reviewed by the Finance Committee:
A) Report on Water Supply Contract with Alderwood Water. Committee requested an update at the
January 2010 Finance Committee meeting. No Council action required.
B) Final 2009 Budget Amendment. Forwarded to the full Council for public hearing.
C) General Fund Report for the month of October 31, 2009. He noted a third quarter budget review
will be provided to the Finance Committee at the December meeting. REET revenues as of
September 30 are 38% below the same time last year and 69% below 2007 or $760,000 below
two years ago September YTD. The original REET budget was $750,000; year end projections
are $445,000. Sales tax is approximately $1 million below budget. The amount collected in
October was the highest YTD which may be due to Cash for Clunkers Program. Utility taxes are
13% over budget and telephone utility taxes are over budget by 8.3%.
D) Mid-Biennial Budget Amendment for 2010. Forwarded to the full Council for public hearing on
December 1.
E) Resolution Finding of Substantial Need and Property Tax Ordinance were acted on earlier in the
meeting.
Councilmember Wambolt emphasized the need for a levy lid lift next year. He pointed out the scenarios
discussed by the Port for redevelopment of Harbor Square did not generate an enormous amount of
revenue.
Public Safety Committee
Councilmember Bernheim summarized items reviewed by the Committee and forwarded to the full
Council on the consent agenda were:
A) Contract for Jail services with Snohomish County Sheriff’s Office
B) Contract with S. Morris Company for Animal Disposal Services
C) Towing Contracts
Packet Page 15 of 253
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
November 17, 2009
Page 13
D) Repeal Ordinance 3706 and Code Chapter 5.65, EMS Transport Charges
E) Ordinance Modifying Certain Fire Provisions in the City Code
10. MAYOR'S COMMENTS
Mayor Haakenson reminded the Council would not meet next week, November 24, and their next meeting
will be December 1.
11. COUNCIL COMMENTS
Council President Wilson advised the City would accept applications for the Council vacancy through the
end of the year. Applications were available at City Hall. He requested staff schedule interviews for the
second Tuesday, January 12, 2010. This would allow the Council to make the appointment and invite the
new member to join the Council at the January 19 meeting. He explained the Council had 90 days to
complete the process; if it was not completed within 90 days of November 10, the Snohomish County
Council would select the new member.
Councilmember Wambolt recalled the last time an appointment was made, candidates were interviewed
on a Saturday.
Mayor Haakenson wished everyone a Happy Thanksgiving.
12. ADJOURN
With no further business, the Council meeting was adjourned at 9:32 p.m.
Packet Page 16 of 253
AM-2627 2.C.
Approval of Claim Checks and Payroll Direct Deposit Checks
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:12/01/2009
Submitted By:Debbie Karber
Submitted For:Lorenzo Hines Time:Consent
Department:Finance Type:Action
Review Committee:
Committee Action:Approved for Consent Agenda
Information
Subject Title
Approval of claim checks #115435 through #115583 dated November 19, 2009 for
$1,428,904.30. Approval of payroll direct deposits and checks #48754 through #48789 for the
pay period November 1, through November 15, 2009 for $844,394.67.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Approval of claim checks and payroll direct deposit and checks.
Previous Council Action
N/A
Narrative
In accordance with the State statutes, City payments must be approved by the City Council.
Ordinance #2896 delegates this approval to the Council President who reviews and recommends
either approval or non-approval of expenditures.
Fiscal Impact
Fiscal Year:2009
Revenue:
Expenditure:$2,273,298.97
Fiscal Impact:
Claims: $1,428,904.30
Payroll: $ 844,394.67
Attachments
Link: Claim cks 11-19-09
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 Finance Lorenzo Hines 11/19/2009 04:33 PM APRV
2 City Clerk Sandy Chase 11/19/2009 04:34 PM APRV
3 Mayor Gary Haakenson 11/19/2009 05:22 PM APRV
4 Final Approval Sandy Chase 11/20/2009 08:38 AM APRV
Packet Page 17 of 253
Form Started By: Debbie
Karber
Started On: 11/19/2009 03:09
PM
Final Approval Date: 11/20/2009
Packet Page 18 of 253
11/19/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
1
11:01:29AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
115435 11/19/2009 070322 A&A LANGUAGE SERVICES INC AUG-09 INTERPRETER FEE
INTERPRETER FEE
001.000.230.512.501.410.01 1,600.85
INTERPRETER FEESEPT & OCT -09
INTERPRETER FEE
001.000.230.512.500.410.01 2,514.90
Total :4,115.75
115436 11/19/2009 073017 AARVIK, HEATHER AARVIK1116 REFUND
REFUND OF DAMAGE DEPOSIT
001.000.000.239.200.000.00 500.00
Total :500.00
115437 11/19/2009 068201 ACTIVE NETWORK INC 1000013043 SET UP REMOTE POS WEB FOR BITCO
Set up remote POS Web for Bitco
001.000.620.558.800.410.00 5,700.00
Total :5,700.00
115438 11/19/2009 066417 AIRGAS NOR PAC INC 101121239 M5Z34
CAL GAS
411.000.656.538.800.310.22 25.00
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.22 2.38
M5Z34101130221
CYLINDER RENTAL
411.000.656.538.800.450.21 56.20
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.450.21 5.34
Total :88.92
115439 11/19/2009 000850 ALDERWOOD WATER DISTRICT 8779 Monthly Wholesale Water Charges for
Monthly Wholesale Water Charges for
411.000.654.534.800.330.00 101,909.17
Total :101,909.17
115440 11/19/2009 061540 ALLIED WASTE SERVICES 0197-001152205 FIRE STATION #20
1Page:
Packet Page 19 of 253
11/19/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
2
11:01:29AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
115440 11/19/2009 (Continued)061540 ALLIED WASTE SERVICES
FIRE STATION #20
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 119.68
Public Works Facility0197-001152292
Public Works Facility
001.000.650.519.910.470.00 24.30
Public Works Facility
111.000.653.542.900.470.00 92.32
Public Works Facility
411.000.654.534.800.470.00 92.32
Public Works Facility
411.000.655.535.800.470.00 92.32
Public Works Facility
511.000.657.548.680.470.00 92.32
Public Works Facility
411.000.652.542.900.470.00 92.31
garbage for F/S #160197-001152362
garbage for F/S #16
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 125.18
garbage for MCC0197-001153037
garbage for MCC
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 57.40
Total :788.15
115441 11/19/2009 069667 AMERICAN MARKETING 10495 BENCH PLAQUE
BENCH PLAQUE - DUGGAN
127.000.640.575.500.310.00 159.40
Freight
127.000.640.575.500.310.00 6.51
9.5% Sales Tax
127.000.640.575.500.310.00 15.76
Total :181.67
115442 11/19/2009 066025 ANDERSON, ANGIE ANDERSON1114 PLAZA ROOM MONITOR
PLAZA ROOM MONITOR~
001.000.640.574.100.410.00 105.00
2Page:
Packet Page 20 of 253
11/19/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
3
11:01:29AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :105.0011544211/19/2009 066025 066025 ANDERSON, ANGIE
115443 11/19/2009 069751 ARAMARK 655-4594134 21580001
UNIFORM SERVICE
411.000.656.538.800.240.00 93.07
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.240.00 8.84
Total :101.91
115444 11/19/2009 071120 ASHLAND INC 92937833 441142
POLYMER
411.000.656.538.800.310.51 4,250.00
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.51 403.75
Total :4,653.75
115445 11/19/2009 069451 ASTRA INDUSTRIAL SERVICES 00108003 Sr Center - Hot Water Repair Supplies
Sr Center - Hot Water Repair Supplies
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 361.00
Freight
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 11.00
Water Quality Supplies00108230
Freight
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 6.76
Water Quality Supplies
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 55.00
Total :433.76
115446 11/19/2009 001777 AURORA PLUMBING & ELECTRIC 163613 Wade James - Clearout Cover Kit
Wade James - Clearout Cover Kit
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 66.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 6.27
Total :72.27
115447 11/19/2009 070305 AUTOMATIC FUNDS TRANSFER 52716 OUT SOURCING OF UTILITY BILLS
3Page:
Packet Page 21 of 253
11/19/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
4
11:01:29AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
115447 11/19/2009 (Continued)070305 AUTOMATIC FUNDS TRANSFER
UB Outsourcing area #700 Printing
411.000.652.542.900.490.00 22.99
UB Outsourcing area #700 Printing
411.000.654.534.800.490.00 22.99
UB Outsourcing area #700 Printing
411.000.655.535.800.490.00 23.07
UB Outsourcing area #700 Postage
411.000.654.534.800.420.00 96.14
UB Outsourcing area #700 Postage
411.000.655.535.800.420.00 96.14
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.652.542.900.490.00 2.18
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.490.00 2.18
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.490.00 2.20
Total :267.89
115448 11/19/2009 001835 AWARDS SERVICE INC 72874 TROPHIES
BASKETBALL TROPHIES
001.000.640.575.520.310.00 63.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.575.520.310.00 5.99
Total :68.99
115449 11/19/2009 001702 AWC EMPLOY BENEFIT TRUST December 2009 DECEMBER 2009 AWC PREMIUMS
12/09 Fire Pension AWC Premiums
617.000.510.522.200.230.00 3,824.50
12/09 Retirees AWC Premiums
009.000.390.517.370.230.00 24,886.70
12/09 Gaydos AWC Premiums
001.000.510.526.100.230.00 1,188.13
12/09 AWC Premiums
811.000.000.231.510.000.00 306,378.84
4Page:
Packet Page 22 of 253
11/19/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
5
11:01:29AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :336,278.1711544911/19/2009 001702 001702 AWC EMPLOY BENEFIT TRUST
115450 11/19/2009 070100 AWWA-NW SUBSECTION 10/14/09 Class Confined Space Training and Metering
Confined Space Training and Metering
411.000.654.534.800.490.00 60.00
Confined Space Training and Metering
411.000.655.535.800.490.00 120.00
Total :180.00
115451 11/19/2009 069226 BHC CONSULTANTS LLC 0002792 E8GA.Services thru 10/23/09
E8GA.Services thru 10/23/09
412.300.630.594.320.410.00 6,423.32
E8GB.Services thru 10/23/090002821
E8GB.Services thru 10/23/09
412.300.630.594.320.410.00 13,443.11
Total :19,866.43
115452 11/19/2009 028050 BILL PIERRE FORD INC 418282 Fleet Brake Parts Inventory
Fleet Brake Parts Inventory
511.000.657.548.680.340.40 427.56
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.340.40 40.62
Fleet Brake Inventory418282-1
Fleet Brake Inventory
511.000.657.548.680.340.40 266.42
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.340.40 25.31
Total :759.91
115453 11/19/2009 069218 BISHOP, PAUL 210 WEB SITE MAINTENANCE
Web Site Maintenance & Modification
001.000.310.518.880.410.00 455.00
Total :455.00
115454 11/19/2009 067519 BLACK BOX CORPORATION 279404 Misc Part for Fiber Project
Misc Part for Fiber Project
001.000.310.518.870.310.00 565.56
5Page:
Packet Page 23 of 253
11/19/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
6
11:01:29AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :565.5611545411/19/2009 067519 067519 BLACK BOX CORPORATION
115455 11/19/2009 068434 BRAUN NORTHWEST INC 10782 Unit 484 - Dome Switch
Unit 484 - Dome Switch
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 14.19
Freight
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 5.50
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 1.87
Total :21.56
115456 11/19/2009 068484 CEMEX E9CA.Pmt 1 E9CA.Payment thru 10/31/09
E9CA.Payment thru 10/31/09
112.200.630.595.330.650.00 654,184.71
Total :654,184.71
115457 11/19/2009 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY LY150141 ALS SUPPLIES
medical oxygen
001.000.510.526.100.310.00 68.94
Freight
001.000.510.526.100.310.00 17.50
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.510.526.100.310.00 8.21
ALS SUPPLIESLY150143
medical oxygen
001.000.510.526.100.310.00 34.47
Freight
001.000.510.526.100.310.00 17.50
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.510.526.100.310.00 4.93
6Page:
Packet Page 24 of 253
11/19/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7
11:01:29AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
115457 11/19/2009 (Continued)003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY
ALS SUPPLIESLY150144
medical oxygen
001.000.510.526.100.310.00 22.98
Freight
001.000.510.526.100.310.00 17.50
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.510.526.100.310.00 3.84
Total :195.87
115458 11/19/2009 064840 CHAPUT, KAREN E CHAPUT11580 FRIDAY NIGHT OUT
FRIDAY NIGHT OUT~
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 28.00
Total :28.00
115459 11/19/2009 066382 CINTAS CORPORATION 460551369 UNIFORMS
Stn 17 - ALS
001.000.510.526.100.240.00 113.19
Stn 17 - OPS
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 113.19
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.510.526.100.240.00 10.76
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 10.75
OPS UNIFORMS460551385
Stn. 20
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 106.26
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 10.09
OPS UNIFORMS460553518
Stn. 16
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 139.89
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 13.29
Total :517.42
7Page:
Packet Page 25 of 253
11/19/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
8
11:01:29AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
115460 11/19/2009 063902 CITY OF EVERETT I09002599 Water Quality - Water Lab Analysis
Water Quality - Water Lab Analysis
411.000.654.534.800.410.00 664.20
Total :664.20
115461 11/19/2009 066997 CITY OF MILL CREEK 11/16/09 Dinner - 10/15 Snohomish County Cities
Dinner - 10/15 Snohomish County Cities
001.000.210.513.100.490.00 76.00
Total :76.00
115462 11/19/2009 004095 COASTWIDE LABS W2106658A RECYCLE CONTAINER
GLUTTON RECYLE CONTAINER
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 111.80
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 10.62
Total :122.42
115463 11/19/2009 004095 COASTWIDE LABS W2124930-2 Fac Maint - Oreck Filters
Fac Maint - Oreck Filters
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 21.51
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 2.04
Total :23.55
115464 11/19/2009 004095 COASTWIDE LABS W2127711 OPS SUPPLIES
stnts' clearning supplies
001.000.510.522.200.310.00 485.02
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.200.310.00 46.08
Total :531.10
115465 11/19/2009 073016 COLODNER, NEAL COLODNER1112 JAPANESE CULTURAL PRESENTATION
EXPENSES INCURRED FOR JAPANESE CULTURAL
623.200.210.557.210.490.00 100.00
Total :100.00
115466 11/19/2009 069983 COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTIONS 2425 CREDIT CARD TRANSACTIONS
8Page:
Packet Page 26 of 253
11/19/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
9
11:01:29AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
115466 11/19/2009 (Continued)069983 COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTIONS
GYMNASTICS SUPPLIES
001.000.640.575.550.310.00 304.02
GYMNASTICS SUPPLIES~
001.000.640.575.550.310.00 257.24
Total :561.26
115467 11/19/2009 065683 CORRY'S FINE DRY CLEANING 510-0128 OPS UNIFORMS
Training Chief
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 37.75
OPS UNIFORMS510-0991
Batt chiefs
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 116.93
PREV UNIFORMS510-1524
Fire Marshal
001.000.510.522.300.240.00 35.95
OPS UNIFORMS510-1539
Batt Chief
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 4.11
ADMIN UNIFORMS510-1884
Fire Chief
001.000.510.522.100.240.00 26.03
OPS UNIFORMS510-2341
Asst Chief
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 56.37
Total :277.14
115468 11/19/2009 005965 CUES INC 315240 Sewer - TV Truck Hardware
Sewer - TV Truck Hardware
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 234.00
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 22.23
9Page:
Packet Page 27 of 253
11/19/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
10
11:01:29AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
115468 11/19/2009 (Continued)005965 CUES INC
Sewer - TV Truck PCB Assy, Charger315767
Sewer - TV Truck PCB Assy, Charger
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 146.48
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 13.92
Sewer - TV Truck - Supplies316054
Sewer - TV Truck - Supplies
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 726.72
Freight
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 25.03
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 71.42
Total :1,239.80
115469 11/19/2009 072278 CUETER, THAYER CUETER11668 FUN WITH FROGS
FUN WITH FROGS~
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 69.30
Total :69.30
115470 11/19/2009 060914 CUMMINS NORTHWEST LLC 001-5949 FS 16 Generator - Supplies
FS 16 Generator - Supplies
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 19.98
Freight
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 18.55
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 3.66
Total :42.19
115471 11/19/2009 068190 DATEC INC 27823 INV#27823 EDMONDS PD
10Page:
Packet Page 28 of 253
11/19/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
11
11:01:29AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
115471 11/19/2009 (Continued)068190 DATEC INC
PANASONIC ULTRA PC-U1 32 GBSSD
001.000.410.521.100.350.00 8,123.30
2 YR WARRANTY EXTENSION-LAPTOP
001.000.410.521.100.350.00 700.00
CRADLE FOR CF-U1
001.000.410.521.100.350.00 424.00
PANASONIC BATTERY U-1
001.000.410.521.100.350.00 202.00
Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.100.350.00 803.19
Total :10,252.49
115472 11/19/2009 061570 DAY WIRELESS SYSTEMS - 16 145403 Radio Repair
Radio Repair
511.000.657.548.680.480.00 117.00
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.480.00 11.12
Unit 484 - Radio Repair145533
Unit 484 - Radio Repair
511.000.657.548.680.480.00 385.00
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.480.00 36.58
Unit eq59fi & eq60fi145561
Unit eq59fi & eq60fi
511.100.657.594.480.640.00 99.00
9.5% Sales Tax
511.100.657.594.480.640.00 9.41
Total :658.11
115473 11/19/2009 061570 DAY WIRELESS SYSTEMS - 16 145532 ALS COMMUNICATIONS
Service Call - replace lithium battery
001.000.510.526.100.480.00 466.25
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.510.526.100.480.00 44.30
11Page:
Packet Page 29 of 253
11/19/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
12
11:01:29AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :510.5511547311/19/2009 061570 061570 DAY WIRELESS SYSTEMS - 16
115474 11/19/2009 064531 DINES, JEANNIE 09-3046 INV#09-3046 EDMONDS PD
TRANSCRIPTION CASE #09-3630
001.000.410.521.210.410.00 78.00
TRANSCRIPTION CASE #09-2949
001.000.410.521.210.410.00 27.00
TRANSCRIPTION CASE #09-1539
001.000.410.521.210.410.00 36.00
TRANSCRIPTION CASE #09-2808
001.000.410.521.210.410.00 63.00
TRANSCRIPTION CASE #09-3780
001.000.410.521.210.410.00 174.00
TRANSCRIPTION IA09-002
001.000.410.521.100.410.00 66.00
TRANSCRIPTION CASE #09-2139
001.000.410.521.210.410.00 57.00
TRANSCRIPTION #SCSO 08-19218
001.000.410.521.210.410.00 27.00
Total :528.00
115475 11/19/2009 007253 DUNN LUMBER 02350951 Sr Center- Primed MDF, Copper Pipe
Sr Center- Primed MDF, Copper Pipe
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 130.84
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 12.43
Total :143.27
115476 11/19/2009 068803 EAST JORDAN IRON WORKS 3206068 Sewer - Manholes & Lids
Sewer - Manholes & Lids
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 8,032.50
Freight
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 50.00
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 767.83
12Page:
Packet Page 30 of 253
11/19/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
13
11:01:29AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :8,850.3311547611/19/2009 068803 068803 EAST JORDAN IRON WORKS
115477 11/19/2009 007675 EDMONDS AUTO PARTS 15837 SUPPLIES
SPARK PLUGS
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 4.18
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 0.40
SUPPLIES15938
ADHESIVE
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 6.88
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 0.65
Total :12.11
115478 11/19/2009 007675 EDMONDS AUTO PARTS 13412 Unit 35 & 37 - Floor Mats
Unit 35 & 37 - Floor Mats
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 90.84
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 8.63
LS 10 - Supplies15222
LS 10 - Supplies
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 51.45
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 4.89
Fleet Shop Supplies15407
Fleet Shop Supplies
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 17.76
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 1.69
Unit 304 - Temp Sensor15526
Unit 304 - Temp Sensor
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 35.92
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 3.41
Total :214.59
13Page:
Packet Page 31 of 253
11/19/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
14
11:01:29AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
115479 11/19/2009 062883 EDMONDS LANDSCAPING INC 71496 HICKMAN PARK LINE CLEARING
HICKMAN PARK PROPERTY LINE CLARNING
125.000.640.576.800.480.00 9,392.87
9.5% Sales Tax
125.000.640.576.800.480.00 892.32
Total :10,285.19
115480 11/19/2009 008812 ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINES 049825 COPY MAINT
COPY MAINT
001.000.230.512.500.480.00 2.73
Total :2.73
115481 11/19/2009 008812 ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINES 049777 Canon 5870 Copier maintenance and
Canon 5870 Copier maintenance and
001.000.220.516.100.480.00 68.42
Canon 5870 Copier maintenance and
001.000.610.519.700.480.00 68.44
Canon 5870 Copier maintenance and
001.000.210.513.100.480.00 68.42
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.220.516.100.480.00 6.50
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.610.519.700.480.00 6.50
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.210.513.100.480.00 6.50
Total :224.78
115482 11/19/2009 009410 EVERETT STEEL COMPANIES 434206 SUPPLIES
ANGLES & TUBES
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 263.95
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 25.08
Total :289.03
115483 11/19/2009 009800 FACTORY DIRECT TIRE SALES 33143 Unit 109 - Installation/Tires
14Page:
Packet Page 32 of 253
11/19/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
15
11:01:29AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
115483 11/19/2009 (Continued)009800 FACTORY DIRECT TIRE SALES
Unit 109 - Installation/Tires
511.000.657.548.680.480.00 233.80
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.480.00 22.21
Total :256.01
115484 11/19/2009 067113 FAST WATER HEATER COMPANY BLD20090770 Overpayment on online transaction.
Overpayment on online transaction.
001.000.000.257.620.000.00 10.00
Total :10.00
115485 11/19/2009 066378 FASTENAL COMPANY WAMOU18399 SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 59.71
Freight
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 5.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 6.15
Total :70.86
115486 11/19/2009 063137 GOODYEAR AUTO SERVICE CENTER 092213 Unit 43 - Tires
Unit 43 - Tires
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 426.32
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 40.50
Unit 43 - Tires092342
Unit 43 - Tires
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 1,031.84
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 98.02
Total :1,596.68
115487 11/19/2009 012199 GRAINGER 9116093643 SAW BLADE
15Page:
Packet Page 33 of 253
11/19/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
16
11:01:29AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
115487 11/19/2009 (Continued)012199 GRAINGER
SAW BLADE
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 15.85
Freight
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 7.58
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 2.22
PORTABLE CALCULATOR9119069400
PORTABLE CALCULATOR
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 3.82
Freight
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 7.58
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 1.08
Total :38.13
115488 11/19/2009 012199 GRAINGER 9109797325 Fac Maint - Smoke Detector Tester
Fac Maint - Smoke Detector Tester
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 143.04
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 13.59
Total :156.63
115489 11/19/2009 071391 GRAY & OSBORNE INC 09555.00-1 E9FE.Services thru 10/17/09
E9FE.Services thru 10/17/09
412.200.630.594.320.410.00 955.83
Total :955.83
115490 11/19/2009 061965 GW AUTO REBUILD RO 35841 Unit 37 - Accident Repairs
Unit 37 - Accident Repairs
511.000.657.548.680.480.00 4,006.13
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.480.00 380.58
Total :4,386.71
115491 11/19/2009 060985 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS 007A9574 036570
16Page:
Packet Page 34 of 253
11/19/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
17
11:01:29AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
115491 11/19/2009 (Continued)060985 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS
CPVC PIPE/VALVE BALL
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 555.00
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 20.00
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 54.63
Total :629.63
115492 11/19/2009 012900 HARRIS FORD INC 100378 Unit 336 - Supplies
Unit 336 - Supplies
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 11.04
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 1.05
Unit 487 - Alternator101782
Unit 487 - Alternator
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 238.42
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 22.65
Unit K93 - Brake Pads101787
Unit K93 - Brake Pads
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 62.28
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 5.92
Total :341.36
115493 11/19/2009 013350 HIGHLAND, SCOTT E3JC.12 E3JC.Services thru 11/06/09
E3JC.Services thru 11/06/09
412.100.630.594.320.410.00 880.82
Total :880.82
115494 11/19/2009 013500 HINGSON, ROBERT 76 LEOFF 1 Reimbursement
LEOFF 1 Reimbursement
009.000.390.517.370.230.00 4.00
Total :4.00
17Page:
Packet Page 35 of 253
11/19/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
18
11:01:29AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
115495 11/19/2009 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 3565889 6035322500959949
PAINTING SUPPLIES/BRUSHES
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 29.70
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 2.82
60353225009599494026937
PIPE/KNIFE/TAPE
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 82.91
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 7.88
60353225009599494568336
PADLOCK/PXYGEN
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 21.21
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 2.01
60353225009599498036292
ROUTER BITS/HKSAW BLADE/ROUTER
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 301.04
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 28.60
60353225009599499970803
LADDERS
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 889.48
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 84.50
Total :1,450.15
115496 11/19/2009 072041 IBS INCORPORATED 444462-1 Fleet Shop Supplies
Fleet Shop Supplies
511.000.657.548.680.350.00 29.39
Freight
511.000.657.548.680.350.00 7.25
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.350.00 3.48
Total :40.12
18Page:
Packet Page 36 of 253
11/19/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
19
11:01:29AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
115497 11/19/2009 006841 IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS 5012813553 Meter charges for Engineering copier
Meter charges for Engineering copier
001.000.620.558.800.450.00 296.06
Total :296.06
115498 11/19/2009 070042 IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS 80765268 Rent on Engineering copier from
Rent on Engineering copier from
001.000.620.558.800.450.00 443.48
Rent on large copier for D.S. Dept.~80765270
Rent on large copier for D.S. Dept.~
001.000.620.558.800.450.00 827.00
Total :1,270.48
115499 11/19/2009 071634 INTEGRA TELECOM 6122898 C/A 768328
PR1-2 City Phone Service thru 11/11/09
001.000.310.518.880.420.00 830.80
Total :830.80
115500 11/19/2009 014940 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS 110434898 Unit 471 - Battery
Unit 471 - Battery
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 135.95
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 12.92
PW Generator Set110434909
PW Generator Set
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 271.90
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 25.83
Fleet Battery Inventoy110434990
Fleet Battery Inventoy
511.000.657.548.680.340.40 143.90
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.340.40 13.67
19Page:
Packet Page 37 of 253
11/19/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
20
11:01:29AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
115500 11/19/2009 (Continued)014940 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS
Fleet Battery Inventory110435132
Fleet Battery Inventory
511.000.657.548.680.340.40 81.95
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.340.40 7.79
Fleet - Battery Returns110435144
Fleet - Battery Returns
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 -225.85
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 -21.46
Fleet Battery Inventory110435145
Fleet Battery Inventory
511.000.657.548.680.340.40 192.85
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.340.40 18.32
Unit 134- Ecco Backup Alarms755744
Unit 134- Ecco Backup Alarms
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 65.58
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 6.23
Total :729.58
115501 11/19/2009 072367 ITA AMD101021 98011021
MEMBERSHIP DUES INSTRUMENTATION
411.000.656.538.800.410.22 255.00
Total :255.00
115502 11/19/2009 072912 KEITH, DOUG KEITH1120 PRESENTATION @ AWARDS RECEPTION
FEATURED CHILDREN'S AUTHOR @ AWARDS
117.100.640.573.100.410.00 150.00
Total :150.00
115503 11/19/2009 068396 KPFF CONSULTING ENGINEERS 1009-108246 E8GC.Services thru 09/30/09
20Page:
Packet Page 38 of 253
11/19/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
21
11:01:29AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
115503 11/19/2009 (Continued)068396 KPFF CONSULTING ENGINEERS
E8GC.Services thru 09/30/09
412.200.630.594.320.410.00 2,452.03
E8GC.Services thru 09/30/09
412.300.630.594.320.410.00 2,452.04
E8GC.Services thru 09/30/09
412.100.630.594.320.410.00 2,452.03
E2DB.Services thru 09/30/09E2DB.42
E2DB.Services thru 09/30/09
125.000.640.594.750.410.00 16,853.21
Total :24,209.31
115504 11/19/2009 068493 L.E.E.D.11090901 INV#11090901 - EDMONDS PD
DD GUN STEEL BODY RELOADABLE
001.000.410.521.230.310.00 963.60
Freight
001.000.410.521.230.310.00 18.45
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.230.310.00 91.33
Total :1,073.38
115505 11/19/2009 017135 LANDAU ASSOCIATES INC 25838 Thuesen Wall/Reidy Shed
Thuesen Wall/Reidy Shed
001.000.620.532.200.410.00 171.05
Total :171.05
115506 11/19/2009 018760 LUNDS OFFICE ESSENTIALS 102599 INV#102599 EDMONDS PD - ANIMAL CONTROL
5,000 #10 WINDOW ENVELOPES
001.000.410.521.700.310.00 398.00
2,500 REMITTANCE ENVELOPES
001.000.410.521.700.310.00 114.78
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.700.310.00 48.71
Total :561.49
115507 11/19/2009 018760 LUNDS OFFICE ESSENTIALS 102784 SUPPLIES
21Page:
Packet Page 39 of 253
11/19/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
22
11:01:29AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
115507 11/19/2009 (Continued)018760 LUNDS OFFICE ESSENTIALS
SUPPLIES
001.000.230.512.500.310.00 337.96
Total :337.96
115508 11/19/2009 018760 LUNDS OFFICE ESSENTIALS 102786 Envelopes for Engineering Dept.
Envelopes for Engineering Dept.
001.000.620.558.800.310.00 134.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.620.558.800.310.00 12.73
Total :146.73
115509 11/19/2009 018950 LYNNWOOD AUTO PARTS INC 589541 Unit 484 - lamps
Unit 484 - lamps
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 9.10
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 0.86
Unit 1 - Starter Lug589691
Unit 1 - Starter Lug
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 12.58
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 1.20
Unit 46 - Fuel Filter589962
Unit 46 - Fuel Filter
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 3.56
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 0.34
Unit 46 - Air Filter589979
Unit 46 - Air Filter
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 5.08
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 0.48
22Page:
Packet Page 40 of 253
11/19/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
23
11:01:29AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
115509 11/19/2009 (Continued)018950 LYNNWOOD AUTO PARTS INC
Unit G10 - Distributor Supplies590293
Unit G10 - Distributor Supplies
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 18.49
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 1.76
Unit 99 - Headlight Bulb590597
Unit 99 - Headlight Bulb
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 6.08
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 0.58
Unit 55 - Serpentine Belt & Supplies590600
Unit 55 - Serpentine Belt & Supplies
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 39.64
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 3.77
Unit 55- Serpentine Belt590644
Unit 55- Serpentine Belt
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 32.77
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 3.11
Unit 55 - MC Lamp590711
Unit 55 - MC Lamp
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 6.32
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 0.60
Unit 40 - Wheel Seal591177
Unit 40 - Wheel Seal
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 4.02
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 0.38
Unit 40 - Heater supplies591233
Unit 40 - Heater supplies
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 7.50
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 0.71
23Page:
Packet Page 41 of 253
11/19/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
24
11:01:29AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
115509 11/19/2009 (Continued)018950 LYNNWOOD AUTO PARTS INC
Unit 40 - Heater Supplies591234
Unit 40 - Heater Supplies
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 8.30
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 0.79
Unit 5 - Wheel Bearing Supplies591849
Unit 5 - Wheel Bearing Supplies
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 60.92
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 5.79
Total :234.73
115510 11/19/2009 019582 MANOR HARDWARE 283261-00 FAC - Supplies
FAC - Supplies
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 48.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 4.56
Total :52.56
115511 11/19/2009 019583 MANPOWER INC 19484171 Receptionist coverage for Nov. 3, 2009.
Receptionist coverage for Nov. 3, 2009.
001.000.620.558.800.410.00 73.04
Total :73.04
115512 11/19/2009 069362 MARSHALL, CITA 644 INTERPRETER FEE
INTERPRETER FEE
001.000.390.512.520.410.00 88.25
INTERPRETER FEE647
INTERPRETER FEE
001.000.230.512.501.410.01 88.25
INTERPRETER FEE651
INTERPRETER FEE
001.000.230.512.501.410.01 88.25
Total :264.75
24Page:
Packet Page 42 of 253
11/19/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
25
11:01:29AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
115513 11/19/2009 019920 MCCANN, MARIAN 77 LEOFF 1 Reimbursement
LEOFF 1 Reimbursement
009.000.390.517.370.290.00 6,072.75
Total :6,072.75
115514 11/19/2009 020039 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO 41322287 123106800
BATERRIES/V BELT/THREADED PIPE/PIPE
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 150.32
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 8.20
12310680041450564
GREASE GUN/PIPE FITTINGS
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 466.30
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 17.91
12310680041532578
GREASE GUN/FITTING/WORK GLOVE/T STRAINER
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 235.79
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 6.42
Total :884.94
115515 11/19/2009 072010 MEISER, GARLAND MEISER1110 PICKLE-BALL LEAGUE SUPERVISOR
PICKLE-BALL LEAGUE SUPERVISOR @
001.000.640.575.520.410.00 84.00
Total :84.00
115516 11/19/2009 072991 MOE, CHELSY MOE1110 MEADOWDALE PRESCHOOL SUB
PRESCHOOL SUB~
001.000.640.575.560.410.00 36.72
Total :36.72
115517 11/19/2009 072746 MURRAY SMITH & ASSOCIATES 09-1030-6 E8JB.Services thru 09/30/09
E8JB.Services thru 09/30/09
412.100.630.594.320.410.00 17,722.00
Total :17,722.00
25Page:
Packet Page 43 of 253
11/19/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
26
11:01:29AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
115518 11/19/2009 024302 NELSON PETROLEUM 0415431-IN Fleet Filter Inventory
Fleet Filter Inventory
511.000.657.548.680.340.40 69.77
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.340.40 6.63
City Units - Filters0415515-IN
City Units - Filters
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 111.13
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 10.55
Fleet Filter Inventory Returns0416250-IN
Fleet Filter Inventory Returns
511.000.657.548.680.340.40 -36.15
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.340.40 -3.43
Total :158.50
115519 11/19/2009 061013 NORTHWEST CASCADE INC 1-039956 HONEY BUCKET RENTAL
HONEY BUCKET RENTAL:~
001.000.640.576.800.450.00 792.51
HONEY BUCKET RENTAL1-041566
HONEY BUCKET RENTAL:~
001.000.640.576.800.450.00 189.87
Total :982.38
115520 11/19/2009 073012 NORTHWEST SIGN RECYCLING 732 Traffic Control - Hydrostripping Signs
Traffic Control - Hydrostripping Signs
111.000.653.542.640.310.00 762.81
Total :762.81
115521 11/19/2009 063511 OFFICE MAX INC 035033 INV#035033 ACCT#520437 250POL EDMONDS
3 MO WALL CALENDAR/MANDEVILLE
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 14.44
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 1.37
26Page:
Packet Page 44 of 253
11/19/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
27
11:01:29AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :15.8111552111/19/2009 063511 063511 OFFICE MAX INC
115522 11/19/2009 063511 OFFICE MAX INC 030345 Copy Paper
Copy Paper
001.000.610.519.700.310.00 19.89
Copy Paper
001.000.220.516.100.310.00 19.89
Copy Paper
001.000.210.513.100.310.00 19.89
Toner - HR printer
001.000.220.516.100.310.00 81.41
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.220.516.100.310.00 13.40
Office Supplies364719
Office Supplies
001.000.220.516.100.310.00 10.50
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.220.516.100.310.00 0.99
Total :165.97
115523 11/19/2009 063511 OFFICE MAX INC 108102 OFFICE SUPPLIES
LETTER SIZED FILE FOLDERS
001.000.640.574.100.310.00 16.78
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.574.100.310.00 1.59
OFFICE SUPPLIES153009
INKJET CARTRIDGE
001.000.640.574.100.310.00 34.63
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.574.100.310.00 3.29
Total :56.29
115524 11/19/2009 063511 OFFICE MAX INC 103143 Misc. office supplies including laser
27Page:
Packet Page 45 of 253
11/19/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
28
11:01:29AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
115524 11/19/2009 (Continued)063511 OFFICE MAX INC
Misc. office supplies including laser
001.000.620.558.800.310.00 205.10
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.620.558.800.310.00 19.49
Backordered calendar for Gina.114298
Backordered calendar for Gina.
001.000.620.558.800.310.00 14.44
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.620.558.800.310.00 1.37
Calendars for Engineering.153706
Calendars for Engineering.
001.000.620.558.800.310.00 193.85
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.620.558.800.310.00 18.41
Total :452.66
115525 11/19/2009 063511 OFFICE MAX INC 115951 OPS SUPPLIES
stations' supplies
001.000.510.522.200.310.00 664.31
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.200.310.00 63.11
Total :727.42
115526 11/19/2009 066339 PACIFIC OFFICE AUTOMATION 945625 B/W copy overage fee~
28Page:
Packet Page 46 of 253
11/19/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
29
11:01:29AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
115526 11/19/2009 (Continued)066339 PACIFIC OFFICE AUTOMATION
B/W copy overage fee~
411.000.654.534.800.480.00 26.53
B/W copy overage fee~
411.000.655.535.800.480.00 26.53
B/W copy overage fee~
411.000.652.542.900.480.00 26.53
B/W copy overage fee~
111.000.653.542.900.480.00 26.51
Color copy overage fee~
411.000.654.534.800.480.00 20.97
Color copy overage fee~
411.000.655.535.800.480.00 20.97
Color copy overage fee~
411.000.652.542.900.480.00 20.97
Color copy overage fee~
111.000.653.542.900.480.00 20.98
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.480.00 4.51
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.480.00 4.51
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.652.542.900.480.00 4.51
9.5% Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.900.480.00 4.52
Total :208.04
115527 11/19/2009 070962 PAULSONS TOWING INC 93642 INV#93642 EDMONDS PD - CASE #09-4176
TOWING CHRYSLER SEBRING 206UCZ
001.000.410.521.220.410.00 158.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.220.410.00 15.01
Total :173.01
115528 11/19/2009 063951 PERTEET ENGINEERING INC 27096.000-21 E7CB.Services thru 08/30/09
29Page:
Packet Page 47 of 253
11/19/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
30
11:01:29AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
115528 11/19/2009 (Continued)063951 PERTEET ENGINEERING INC
E7CB.Services thru 08/30/09
112.200.630.595.440.410.00 2,250.25
Total :2,250.25
115529 11/19/2009 007800 PETTY CASH tc petty cash nov coffee 2nd floor
coffee 2nd floor
001.000.620.532.200.310.00 35.98
mileage reimb-Kernen Lien
001.000.620.558.600.430.00 143.59
sccfoa meeting-Hynd
001.000.250.514.300.490.00 14.00
sccfoa meeting-Chase
001.000.250.514.300.490.00 14.00
Parking reimb-English
001.000.620.532.200.430.00 5.00
flu shot-Gail Donnelly
001.000.220.516.100.490.00 15.00
beverages for econ. dev commision mtg
001.000.240.513.110.310.00 32.14
cookies for PB mtg 10/28/09
001.000.240.513.110.310.00 8.48
cookies for PB meeting
001.000.620.558.600.310.00 19.90
mileage reimb-jury duty-William Boyle
001.000.510.522.200.430.00 61.60
delivery fee-PB meeting
001.000.620.558.600.490.00 12.00
zip ties for posting hearing notices
001.000.620.558.600.310.00 3.06
Total :364.75
115530 11/19/2009 068910 PHYSIO-CONTROL INC PH674419 OPS COMMS
30Page:
Packet Page 48 of 253
11/19/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
31
11:01:29AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
115530 11/19/2009 (Continued)068910 PHYSIO-CONTROL INC
adapter cable, sensors
001.000.510.522.200.310.00 263.50
Freight
001.000.510.522.200.310.00 19.75
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.200.310.00 26.92
Total :310.17
115531 11/19/2009 064552 PITNEY BOWES 3833100NV09 POSTAGE METER LEASE
Lease 10/30 to 11/30
001.000.250.514.300.450.00 866.00
Total :866.00
115532 11/19/2009 029117 PORT OF EDMONDS 03870 CITY OF EDMONDS STORMWATER
Stormwater Rent & Leasehold tax
411.000.652.542.900.450.00 1,682.79
Total :1,682.79
115533 11/19/2009 067263 PUGET SAFETY EQUIPMENT COMPANY 0037524-IN EDMCITW
SANI CLOTH/HAND SANITIZER/ASPIRIN
411.000.656.538.800.310.12 103.50
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.12 9.84
Total :113.34
115534 11/19/2009 030695 PUMPTECH INC 0022476-IN 0047800
SUBMERSIBLE EFFLUENT PUMP
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 328.87
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 31.25
Total :360.12
115535 11/19/2009 064291 QWEST 206-Z02-0478 332B TELEMETRY
TELEMETRY
411.000.656.538.800.420.00 138.52
31Page:
Packet Page 49 of 253
11/19/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
32
11:01:29AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :138.5211553511/19/2009 064291 064291 QWEST
115536 11/19/2009 071979 SACKVILLE, JODI L 11/16/09 OT from sick leave buy back (10/9 -
OT from sick leave buy back (10/9 -
001.000.410.521.220.110.00 88.31
Total :88.31
115537 11/19/2009 067681 SAGE CONTROL ORDNANCE INC 10072 INV#10072 - EDMONDS PD
IMPACT BATON-STANDARD ENERGY
001.000.410.521.230.310.00 465.30
IMPACT BATON-LESS ENERGY
001.000.410.521.230.310.00 169.20
Freight
001.000.410.521.230.310.00 57.95
Total :692.45
115538 11/19/2009 068177 SHRM 9002946041 Debi - SHRM membership fee 2/1/10 -
Debi - SHRM membership fee 2/1/10 -
001.000.220.516.100.490.00 160.00
Total :160.00
115539 11/19/2009 068489 SIRENNET.COM 0101809-IN Unit 337 - Red & Blue
Unit 337 - Red & Blue
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 297.60
Freight
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 13.75
Unit 650 - Cables0101872-IN
Unit 650 - Cables
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 411.60
Freight
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 13.75
Units eq59fi & eq60fi - Vertical0102396-IN
Units eq59fi & eq60fi - Vertical
511.100.657.594.480.640.00 123.20
Freight
511.100.657.594.480.640.00 13.75
32Page:
Packet Page 50 of 253
11/19/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
33
11:01:29AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
115539 11/19/2009 (Continued)068489 SIRENNET.COM
Unit 337 - Supplies0102640-IN
Unit 337 - Supplies
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 49.50
Freight
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 13.75
Total :936.90
115540 11/19/2009 071502 SLENKER, ROBERT 2449 TRAINING/TRAVEL SLENKER
TRAINING/TRAVEL SLENKER
411.000.656.538.800.430.00 77.05
Total :77.05
115541 11/19/2009 060889 SNAP-ON INDUSTRIAL ARV/11427379 Fleet Shop - Debur Kit
Fleet Shop - Debur Kit
511.000.657.548.680.350.00 21.45
Freight
511.000.657.548.680.350.00 20.45
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.350.00 3.99
Total :45.89
115542 11/19/2009 037225 SNO CO CLERKS & FINANCE ASSOC 11/19/09 S Chase;L Hynd;DKarber Nov-09 Mtg
S Chase;L Hynd;DKarber Nov-09 Mtg
001.000.310.514.230.490.00 14.00
S Chase;L Hynd;DKarber Nov-09 Mtg
001.000.250.514.300.490.00 28.00
Total :42.00
115543 11/19/2009 037801 SNO CO HUMAN SERVICE DEPT I000233125 Q3-09 LIQUOR BOARD PROFITS & TAXES
Q3-09 Liquor Board Profits & Taxes
001.000.390.567.000.510.00 2,682.71
Total :2,682.71
115544 11/19/2009 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 2450016544 UTILITY BILLING
18500 82ND AVE W
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 67.54
33Page:
Packet Page 51 of 253
11/19/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
34
11:01:29AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
115544 11/19/2009 (Continued)037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1
UTILITY BILLING3160831347
23700 104TH AVE W
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 185.40
UTILITY BILLING3570014369
8030 185TH ST SW
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 153.83
IRRIGATION SYSTEM5070014245
IRRIGATION SYSTEM
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 30.32
Total :437.09
115545 11/19/2009 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 2070015082 LIFT STATION #7
LIFT STATION #7
411.000.655.535.800.470.00 89.05
LIFT STATION #102400010746
LIFT STATION #10
411.000.655.535.800.470.00 108.28
LIFT STATION #22410016253
LIFT STATION #2
411.000.655.535.800.470.00 48.04
SEAVIEW RESERVOIR2880027277
SEAVIEW RESERVOIR
411.000.654.534.800.470.00 28.83
SCHOOL FLASHING LIGHT3970013581
SCHOOL FLASHING LIGHT
111.000.653.542.640.470.00 28.78
Total :302.98
115546 11/19/2009 037376 SNO CO PUD NO 1 WO 369942-03/06 E3JC.Installation Fee for Electric
E3JC.Installation Fee for Electric
412.100.630.594.320.650.00 13,499.00
Total :13,499.00
115547 11/19/2009 063941 SNO CO SHERIFFS OFFICE I000231797 INV I000231797 CUST#SSH00010 EDMONDS PD
34Page:
Packet Page 52 of 253
11/19/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
35
11:01:29AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
115547 11/19/2009 (Continued)063941 SNO CO SHERIFFS OFFICE
TASK FORCE JULY-DEC 2009
001.000.410.521.100.510.00 4,793.50
Total :4,793.50
115548 11/19/2009 006630 SNOHOMISH COUNTY I000237743 SOLID WASTE
SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 325.29
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 11.71
Total :337.00
115549 11/19/2009 006630 SNOHOMISH COUNTY I000237772 SOW5101
SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL
411.000.656.538.800.490.00 61.00
Total :61.00
115550 11/19/2009 072135 SNOHOMISH COUNTY I000232184 Annual Fiber Connectivity/Equipment
Annual Fiber Connectivity/Equipment
001.000.310.518.870.490.00 600.00
Total :600.00
115551 11/19/2009 067809 SNOHOMISH COUNTY FINANCE I000237878 INVOICE A
800 MHZ Prin Pmt 2nd half 2009
001.000.390.591.220.710.00 74,328.26
800 MHZ Int Pmt 2nd half 2008
001.000.390.592.220.830.00 23,704.80
INVOICE BI000237879
800 MHZ Prin Billing 2nd half 09 SnoCom
001.000.390.591.220.710.00 20,341.76
800 MHZ Int Billing 2nd half 09 SnoCom
001.000.390.592.220.830.00 6,487.41
Total :124,862.23
115552 11/19/2009 064793 SPELLMAN, JANA 10/12/09 10/12/09 Video Taping Services Sno Co
10/12/09 Video Taping Services Sno Co
001.000.000.362.420.000.00 120.00
35Page:
Packet Page 53 of 253
11/19/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
36
11:01:29AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :120.0011555211/19/2009 064793 064793 SPELLMAN, JANA
115553 11/19/2009 070677 SPRINT 502779811-023 INV#502779811-023 EDMONDS PD
DATA CARDS 11/07 - 12/06/09
001.000.410.521.220.420.00 169.97
Total :169.97
115554 11/19/2009 069997 SRI TECHNOLOGIES INC 98565 E6DA.Roberts thru 10/03/09
E6DA.Roberts thru 10/03/09
125.000.640.594.750.410.00 1,332.50
E6DB.Roberts thru 10/03/09
112.200.630.595.330.410.00 487.50
E6DA.Roberts Mileage thru 10/03/09
125.000.640.594.750.410.00 44.00
E6DA.Roberts thru 10/10/0998710
E6DA.Roberts thru 10/10/09
125.000.640.594.750.410.00 2,746.25
E6DA.Roberts Mileage thru 10/10/09
125.000.640.594.750.410.00 44.00
E6DA.Roberts thru 10/17/0998875
E6DA.Roberts thru 10/17/09
125.000.640.594.750.410.00 1,917.50
E6DA.Roberts mileage thru 10/17/09
125.000.640.594.750.410.00 33.00
E6DA.Roberts thru 11/07/0999376
E6DA.Roberts thru 11/07/09
125.000.640.594.750.410.00 1,722.50
E4GA.Roberts thru 11/07/09
412.300.630.594.320.410.00 650.00
E6DA.Roberts Mileage thru 11/07/09
125.000.640.594.750.410.00 38.50
E4GA.Roberts Mileage thru 11/07/09
412.300.630.594.320.410.00 5.50
Total :9,021.25
115555 11/19/2009 040300 STEVENS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL 10/21/09 10/21/09 Flu Shots
36Page:
Packet Page 54 of 253
11/19/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
37
11:01:29AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
115555 11/19/2009 (Continued)040300 STEVENS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
10/21/09 Flu Shots
001.000.220.516.100.490.00 1,170.00
Total :1,170.00
115556 11/19/2009 040430 STONEWAY ELECTRIC SUPPLY 2033263 Fac Maint - Elect Supplies
Fac Maint - Elect Supplies
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 411.08
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 39.05
Total :450.13
115557 11/19/2009 068360 SUMMIT LAW GROUP 44131 Investigation services
Investigation services
001.000.651.519.920.410.00 8,918.00
Total :8,918.00
115558 11/19/2009 040917 TACOMA SCREW PRODUCTS INC 10885476 UPSIDE DOWN PAINT
WHITE UPSIDE-DOWN PAINT
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 97.48
Freight
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 15.17
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 10.70
TAPPING SCREWS10890261
TAPPING SCREWS
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 12.32
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 1.17
Total :136.84
115559 11/19/2009 066056 THE SEATTLE TIMES 11/3/09 Police Services Assistant Ad, #09-29
Police Services Assistant Ad, #09-29
001.000.220.516.100.440.00 382.00
Total :382.00
115560 11/19/2009 042800 TRI-CITIES SECURITY 16232 Unit 304 - Keys
37Page:
Packet Page 55 of 253
11/19/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
38
11:01:29AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
115560 11/19/2009 (Continued)042800 TRI-CITIES SECURITY
Unit 304 - Keys
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 4.50
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 0.43
Total :4.93
115561 11/19/2009 062693 US BANK 1070 INV#1070 11/06/09-THOMPSON - EDMONDS PD
SERVICE & RETIREMENT PLAQUES
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 155.49
ARCHIVE CLASS/THOMPSON
001.000.410.521.400.490.00 30.00
CALENDAR REFILL/MACHADO
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 47.03
INV#3181 11/06/09 - BARD- EDMONDS PD3181
RANGE TARGETS
001.000.410.521.400.310.00 128.12
HWY PATROL TARGETS
001.000.410.521.400.310.00 81.65
CARD READER PHOTO DOWNLOADER
001.000.410.521.400.310.00 21.89
INV#3215 11/06/09 - COMPAAN - EDMONDS PD3215
TRAINING ADA/FMLA-COMPAAN
001.000.410.521.400.490.00 15.00
INV#3314 11/06/09 - LAWLESS - EDMONDS PD3314
TOOL KITS FOR VEHICLES
001.000.410.521.220.310.00 282.53
INV#3314 11/06/09 LAWLESS-EDMONDS PD3314
RETURNED TOOL KITS FOR VEHICLES
001.000.410.521.220.310.00 -152.84
38Page:
Packet Page 56 of 253
11/19/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
39
11:01:29AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
115561 11/19/2009 (Continued)062693 US BANK
INV#3520 11/06/09 - TRAINING -EDMONDS PD3520
FERRY CHARGE-MANDEVILLE
001.000.410.521.910.490.00 28.90
DINNER-NACA-DAWSON
001.000.410.521.400.430.00 10.87
BREAKFAST-NACA-DAWSON
001.000.410.521.400.430.00 9.38
DINNER-NACA-DAWSON
001.000.410.521.400.430.00 12.94
LUNCH-NACA-DAWSON
001.000.410.521.400.430.00 14.10
DINNER-NACA-DAWSON
001.000.410.521.400.430.00 5.19
Total :690.25
115562 11/19/2009 062693 US BANK 110609 HOTELL ROOM FOR AMBER & NORI
HOTELL ROOM FOR AMBER & NORI
001.000.230.512.500.430.00 333.04
POSTAGE FOR PASSPORT MAILING
001.000.230.512.501.420.00 81.60
LATE FEE
001.000.230.512.500.490.00 2.00
Total :416.64
115563 11/19/2009 062693 US BANK 3207 Mayors and Managers Fall Summit
Mayors and Managers Fall Summit
001.000.240.513.110.490.00 175.00
Voter Election and Data Request Form
001.000.110.550.100.490.00 11.60
Mayors and Managers Fall Summit
001.000.310.514.230.490.00 175.00
Snohomish County Mayor's luncheon3264
Snohomish County Mayor's luncheon
001.000.210.513.100.490.00 20.00
39Page:
Packet Page 57 of 253
11/19/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
40
11:01:29AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
115563 11/19/2009 (Continued)062693 US BANK
Finance director reception food3280
Finance director reception food
001.000.220.516.100.310.00 39.93
Police Services Assistant Ad, #09-29
001.000.220.516.100.440.00 25.00
Total :446.53
115564 11/19/2009 062693 US BANK 3330 CREDIT CARD TRANSACTIONS
PARKING/BRIAN MCINTOSH
001.000.640.574.100.430.00 4.00
REPORT COVERS
001.000.640.574.100.310.00 19.68
CREDIT CARD TRANSACTIONS3538
WRITE ON THE SOUND COFFEE SUPPLIES
117.100.640.573.100.310.00 26.00
GYM WIPES
001.000.640.575.540.310.00 40.63
DARKROOM ENLARGER BULBS
001.000.640.574.200.310.00 48.31
DARKROOM CHEMICALS
001.000.640.574.200.310.00 32.99
BULBS
001.000.640.576.810.310.00 216.20
SPOTTING BELT HARDWARE/GYMNASTICS
001.000.640.575.550.310.00 55.04
MANILA ROPE/GYMNASTICS
001.000.640.575.550.310.00 16.92
SPOTTING BELT ROPE
001.000.640.575.550.310.00 41.00
Total :500.77
115565 11/19/2009 062693 US BANK 2462 Acteva - Registration C Nelson ACCIS
40Page:
Packet Page 58 of 253
11/19/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
41
11:01:29AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
115565 11/19/2009 (Continued)062693 US BANK
Acteva - Registration C Nelson ACCIS
001.000.310.518.880.490.00 325.00
Cleverbridge-Software
001.000.310.518.880.310.00 609.00
PrinterTechs.com - Printer maint Kit
001.000.310.518.880.310.00 209.00
Network Hardware - Fiber Proj Misc Parts
001.000.310.518.870.310.00 699.70
Advantage Laser - Micro Toner3470
Advantage Laser - Micro Toner
001.000.310.514.230.310.00 210.00
Total :2,052.70
115566 11/19/2009 062693 US BANK 3306 TRAINING/KOHO
TRAINING/KOHO
411.000.656.538.800.490.71 484.00
Total :484.00
115567 11/19/2009 062693 US BANK 3405 Guardian Security Systems - Old PW
Guardian Security Systems - Old PW
001.000.651.519.920.480.00 55.00
Best Buy - Fac Maint - Hands Fee Device
001.000.651.519.920.350.00 109.49
Mech Sales Inc - PS - Burners
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 169.11
Fred Meyer -Sewer TV Truck - Video3439
Fred Meyer -Sewer TV Truck - Video
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 65.69
Offic Max - Sewer TV Truck - Power
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 26.26
41Page:
Packet Page 59 of 253
11/19/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
42
11:01:29AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
115567 11/19/2009 (Continued)062693 US BANK
USPS - Sewer -Return Shipping Fees3546
USPS - Sewer -Return Shipping Fees
411.000.655.535.800.420.00 7.68
Johnson Industries - Sewer - Pipe
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 76.45
APWA - Street/Storm Webinar - Sign
111.000.653.542.900.490.00 225.00
APWA - Street/Storm Webinar - Sign
411.000.652.542.900.490.00 225.00
USPS - Fac Maint - ATS Return Postage
001.000.651.519.920.420.00 4.80
USPS - Fleet- Whelen Return Postage Fees
511.000.657.548.680.420.00 11.41
Evergreen Rural Water - Water - Annual
411.000.654.534.800.490.00 225.00
USPS - Fleet- Braun NW Return Shipping
511.000.657.548.680.420.00 10.16
USPS - Fleet- WS Darley Return Shipping
511.000.657.548.680.420.00 10.07
USPS - Fleet- Whelen Return Shipping
511.000.657.548.680.420.00 4.80
Total :1,225.92
115568 11/19/2009 062693 US BANK 3389 Reception supplies for joint FD1 &
Reception supplies for joint FD1 &
001.000.110.511.100.310.00 42.73
Total :42.73
115569 11/19/2009 062693 US BANK 3173 ALLISON
Stn BBQ
001.000.510.522.200.310.00 568.31
CORREIRA3223
OPS misc Survey Monkey
001.000.510.522.200.490.00 19.95
42Page:
Packet Page 60 of 253
11/19/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
43
11:01:29AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
115569 11/19/2009 (Continued)062693 US BANK
WHITE3454
meeting supplies
001.000.510.522.200.310.00 9.61
Total :597.87
115570 11/19/2009 072350 US FIRE EQUIPMENT LLC 5120 Unit 476 - Repairs
Unit 476 - Repairs
511.000.657.548.680.480.00 2,674.34
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.480.00 248.71
Total :2,923.05
115571 11/19/2009 044960 UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOC CTR 9100111 utility locates
utility locates
411.000.654.534.800.410.00 91.34
utility locates
411.000.655.535.800.410.00 91.34
utility locates
411.000.652.542.900.410.00 91.37
Total :274.05
115572 11/19/2009 063334 VAN SLYKE, MICHELLE EAC1111009 REFURBISHING ARTWORK
REFURBISHING MURAL PIECES
117.200.640.575.500.410.00 1,500.00
Total :1,500.00
115573 11/19/2009 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST 425-744-1681 SEAVIEW PARK IRRIGATION MODEM
SEAVIEW PARK IRRIGATION MODEM
001.000.640.576.800.420.00 42.68
SIERRA PARK IRRIGATION MODEM425-744-1691
SIERRA PARK IRRIGATION MODEM
001.000.640.576.800.420.00 42.02
MEADOWDALE PRESCHOOL425-745-5055
MEADOWDALE PRESCHOOL
001.000.640.575.560.420.00 56.75
43Page:
Packet Page 61 of 253
11/19/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
44
11:01:29AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
115573 11/19/2009 (Continued)011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST
BEACH RANGER PHONE @ FISHING PIER425-775-1344
BEACH RANGER PHONE @ FISHING PIER
001.000.640.574.350.420.00 53.25
YOST POOL425-775-2645
YOST POOL
001.000.640.575.510.420.00 51.43
GROUNDS MAINTENANCE FAX MODEM425-776-5316
GROUNDS MAINTENANCE FAX MODEM
001.000.640.576.800.420.00 108.33
Total :354.46
115574 11/19/2009 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST 425 712-0423 03 0260 1032797
AFTER HOURS PHONE
411.000.656.538.800.420.00 56.03
Total :56.03
115575 11/19/2009 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST 425-774-1031 Sewer- Lift Station
Sewer- Lift Station
411.000.655.535.800.420.00 45.77
LIBRARY ELEVATOR PHONE425-776-1281
LIBRARY ELEVATOR PHONE
001.000.651.519.920.420.00 47.68
1ST & PINE CIRCUIT LINE PT EDWARDS425-AB9-0530
1st & Pine Circuit Line for Pt Edwards
411.000.655.535.800.420.00 40.62
Total :134.07
115576 11/19/2009 006284 W S DARLEY AND CO AP657910 Unit 475 - Gages
Unit 475 - Gages
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 109.59
Freight
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 10.73
Total :120.32
115577 11/19/2009 069380 WASHINGTON CHAPTER FBINAA 2010 W NELSON 2010 DUES WILLIAM NELSON, EDMONDS PD
44Page:
Packet Page 62 of 253
11/19/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
45
11:01:29AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
115577 11/19/2009 (Continued)069380 WASHINGTON CHAPTER FBINAA
2010 ACTIVE MEMBER DUES
001.000.410.521.220.490.00 80.00
Total :80.00
115578 11/19/2009 070772 WCEMSTCC 110509-07 ALS MISC
PI, JS prehosp conf
001.000.510.526.100.490.00 470.00
Total :470.00
115579 11/19/2009 048100 WEINZ, JACK D 78 LEOFF 1 Reimbursement
LEOFF 1 Reimbursement
617.000.510.522.200.230.00 150.00
Total :150.00
115580 11/19/2009 049208 WESTERN EQUIP DIST INC 616729 Unit 109 - V Belt
Unit 109 - V Belt
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 16.59
Freight
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 8.25
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 2.36
Total :27.20
115581 11/19/2009 064008 WETLANDS & WOODLANDS 38431004 FIR TREES/CELEBRATION OF LIGHTS TREE
MEMORIAL TREES & TREE OF LIGHTS
127.000.640.575.500.310.00 425.00
9.5% Sales Tax
127.000.640.575.500.310.00 40.38
Total :465.38
115582 11/19/2009 073018 WILCO-WINFIELD 106435 GARDEN SUPPLIES
22-4-22 PTS FLL KNG 50#
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 950.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 90.25
45Page:
Packet Page 63 of 253
11/19/2009
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
46
11:01:29AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
115582 11/19/2009 (Continued)073018 WILCO-WINFIELD
CROSSBOW106508
CROSSBOW
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 153.53
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 14.59
BIO BARRIER107073
BIO BARRIER
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 649.90
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 61.74
Total :1,920.01
115583 11/19/2009 070717 WSU URBAN & PESTICIDE SAFETY DILL/HARRIS PESTICIDE RECERTIFICATION
PESTICIDE RECERTIFICATION:~
001.000.640.576.800.490.00 200.00
Total :200.00
Bank total : 1,428,904.30149 Vouchers for bank code :front
1,428,904.30Total vouchers :Vouchers in this report149
46Page:
Packet Page 64 of 253
AM-2617 2.D.
Claims for Damages
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:12/01/2009
Submitted By:Linda Hynd
Submitted For:Sandy Chase Time:Consent
Department:City Clerk's Office Type:Action
Review Committee:
Committee Action:
Information
Subject Title
Acknowledge receipt of Claims for Damages from Douglas Hall (amount undetermined), Ricky
Arntsen (Claim No. 2, amount undetermined), and Timothy J. Glass (amount undetermined).
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
It is recommended that the City Council acknowledge receipt of the Claims for Damages by
minute entry.
Previous Council Action
N/A
Narrative
Douglas Hall
9424 235th Place SW
Edmonds, WA 98020
(amount undetermined)
Rick Arntsen
Clallam Bay Corrections Center
1830 Eagle Crest West
Clallam Bay, WA 98336
(amount undetermined)
Timothy J. Glass
19110 80th Avenue
Edmonds, WA
(amount undetermined)
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: Hall Claim for Damages
Link: Arntsen No. 2 Claim for Damages
Link: Glass Claim for Damages
Packet Page 65 of 253
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 11/17/2009 10:49 AM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 11/17/2009 11:12 AM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 11/19/2009 09:55 AM APRV
Form Started By: Linda
Hynd
Started On: 11/17/2009 09:19
AM
Final Approval Date: 11/19/2009
Packet Page 66 of 253
Packet Page 67 of 253
Packet Page 68 of 253
Packet Page 69 of 253
Packet Page 70 of 253
Packet Page 71 of 253
Packet Page 72 of 253
Packet Page 73 of 253
Packet Page 74 of 253
Packet Page 75 of 253
Packet Page 76 of 253
Packet Page 77 of 253
Packet Page 78 of 253
Packet Page 79 of 253
Packet Page 80 of 253
Packet Page 81 of 253
Packet Page 82 of 253
Packet Page 83 of 253
Packet Page 84 of 253
Packet Page 85 of 253
Packet Page 86 of 253
Packet Page 87 of 253
Packet Page 88 of 253
Packet Page 89 of 253
Packet Page 90 of 253
Packet Page 91 of 253
Packet Page 92 of 253
AM-2619 2.E.
Liquor Control Board List of Businesses
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:12/01/2009
Submitted By:Linda Carl
Submitted For:Gary Haakenson Time:Consent
Department:Mayor's Office Type:Action
Review Committee:
Committee Action:
Information
Subject Title
Approval of list of businesses applying for renewal of their liquor licenses with the Washington
State Liquor Control Board, November 2009.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Previous Council Action
Narrative
The City Clerk’s Office, the Police department, and the Mayor’s Office have reviewed the
attached list and have no concerns with the Washington State Liquor Control Board renewing the
liquor licenses for the listed businesses.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: WSLCB List
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 11/19/2009 03:00 PM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 11/19/2009 05:22 PM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 11/20/2009 08:38 AM APRV
Form Started By: Linda
Carl
Started On: 11/17/2009 01:26
PM
Final Approval Date: 11/20/2009
Packet Page 93 of 253
Packet Page 94 of 253
AM-2588 2.F.
2010 Employment Contract for Senior Executive Council Assistant
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:12/01/2009
Submitted By:Jana Spellman
Submitted For:Council President Wilson Time:Consent
Department:City Council Type:Action
Review Committee:
Committee Action:
Information
Subject Title
Authorization for the Mayor to sign the 2010 Employment Contract with Jana Spellman, Senior
Executive Council Assistant.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Previous Council Action
Narrative
Request for renewal of Employment Contract with Jana Spellman, Sr. Ex. Council Assistant for
2010.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: Exh 1 2010 Contract Addendum
Link: Exh 2 2009 Contract Addendum
Link: Exh 3 Full Contract
Link: Exh 4 Job Duties
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 11/16/2009 03:26 PM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 11/16/2009 03:27 PM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 11/16/2009 05:06 PM APRV
Form Started By: Jana
Spellman
Started On: 11/05/2009 10:04
AM
Final Approval Date: 11/16/2009
Packet Page 95 of 253
Packet Page 96 of 253
Packet Page 97 of 253
Packet Page 98 of 253
Packet Page 99 of 253
Packet Page 100 of 253
Packet Page 101 of 253
Packet Page 102 of 253
AM-2635 2.G.
Contract for Services with the Cascade Land Conservancy
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:12/01/2009
Submitted By:Rob Chave
Submitted For:Council President Wilson Time:Consent
Department:Planning Type:Action
Review Committee:
Committee Action:
Information
Subject Title
Authorization for Mayor to sign a contract for services with the Cascade Land Conservancy to
become a "Cascade Agenda Leadership City."
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Approve the agreement, and allocate $5,000 from Council contingency funds to pay the annual
membership fee for the first year's membership.
Previous Council Action
Council heard a presentation on this subject on July 28, 2009 (see attached minutes).
Narrative
The City of Edmonds is currently a membership city in the Cascade Agenda Cities Program. The
Cascade Conservancy provided a presentation on its programs in July of this year (see Exhibits 2
and 3), and highlighted the benefits of becoming a Leadership City. The attached agreement
(Exhibit 1) would commit the City to joining the Cascade Agenda Leadership City program, with
an annual membership cost of $5,000. In return, the City would obtain assistance and support
from the program, as described in the agreement. Sample projects that could be collaborated on
are shown in Exhibit 4.
Fiscal Impact
Fiscal Year:2009
Revenue:
Expenditure:$5,000
Fiscal Impact:
Staff time. There will be an additional impact on City staff time in order to support this program.
Staff time is undetermined, but should be expected to be at least equivalent to the time allocated
by the Cascade Conservancy (i.e. 25-30 hours).
Attachments
Link: Exhibit 1: Draft Agreement
Link: Exhibit 2: July Presentation
Packet Page 103 of 253
Link: Exhibit 3: City Council Minutes
Link: Exhibit 4: Examples of cooperative projects
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 11/20/2009 01:55 PM APRV
2 Mayor Sandy Chase 11/20/2009 01:56 PM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 11/20/2009 01:59 PM APRV
Form Started By: Rob
Chave
Started On: 11/20/2009 09:49
AM
Final Approval Date: 11/20/2009
Packet Page 104 of 253
MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT CREATING A FRAMEWORK FOR COOPERATION
This Memorandum of Agreement ("Agreement") is entered into by and between the City
of Edmonds, Washington, a municipal corporation of the State of Washington (“the
City”) and Cascade Land Conservancy, a Washington non-profit corporation,
(“Cascade”) to establish a framework of collaboration through which the parties will
advance their mutual interest by creating complete, compact and connected communities,
which protect the natural environment.
WHEREAS, the population in the Puget Sound region is expected to double in the next one
hundred (100) years on top of the already dramatic growth recently experienced, thereby
significantly affecting the growth of cities and towns, and
WHEREAS, in the face of such growth, the City can guide how and where this growth will
occur in order to maintain and enhance the quality of life, and
WHEREAS, long-term ecosystem health, quality of life, and economic vitality are key
interest of the City, its residents, and
WHEREAS, The Cascade Agenda is a 100-year vision for King, Pierce, Snohomish,
Mason, and Kittitas Counties that sets forth goals and strategies to conserve this region’s
land while sustaining a strong regional economy, and creating vibrant and livable
communities, and
WHEREAS, the Cascade has launched the “Cascade Agenda Cities Program” to recognize
the necessary connection between the creation of great communities and the conservation
of this region’s ecosystems and working lands, and
WHEREAS, The City of Edmonds and Cascade believe that by working together they
will build on and multiply the strengths and resources of each organization to advance the
missions of both by creating complete, compact and connected communities which
protect the natural environment.
NOW, THEREFORE, The City of Edmonds and Cascade agree as follows:
1) AGREEMENT TO COOPERATE
By making this agreement, the parties intend to establish a framework of
collaboration in the areas discussed below. Each specific project or endeavour
undertaken by the parties under this agreement will be separately negotiated and may
be the subject of separate binding contracts in a form appropriate to the subject.
Nothing in this Agreement is intended to bind either party to any specific project or
endeavour or to create any recourse by either party against the other.
Packet Page 105 of 253
2
2) CITY OF EDMONDS ROLE
a) STRATEGY IDENTIFICATION The City will complete a livability self-assessment
to identify what policies and ordinances are in place to create complete, compact
and connected communities within the City. The self-assessment will pinpoint
areas where the community is implementing successful policies and reveal
potential areas of collaboration. Based on this assessment as well as additional
indicators of the impacts of these city policies, the parties will jointly identify two
or three strategies to be implemented through the cooperative efforts of the
parties. These strategies may include community outreach and education, policy
development, pilot projects or other activities.
b) ADVANCE REGIONAL KNOWLEDGE In order to advance regional knowledge and
understanding of best practices for creating complete, compact and connected
communities, the City agrees to assist Cascade in developing a regional peer
learning network by attending quarterly meetings and workshops, sharing ideas
and lessons learned, addressing challenges and identifying needs and
opportunities.
c) STAFFING AND RESOURCES The City will commit appropriate staffing and
resources to facilitate communication and collaboration, including designating a
primary staff contact and creating an interdepartmental team to increase
coordination among City departments that affect development, land use and
transportation.
d) MEMBERSHIP FEE The City will pay an annual membership fee of $5,000. The
first payment shall to made no later than thirty days after the execution of the
Agreement by both parties. The membership fee for subsequent years shall be
paid no later than this Agreement’s anniversary date.
3) CASCADE LAND CONSERVANCY ROLE
a) PROVISION OF SERVICES Cascade will provide services to the City through the
Cascade Agenda Leadership Cities Program to aid in raising public awareness of
land use, transportation and climate protection issues and in the implementation of
smart growth strategies. These services will include research into best practices,
workshops, tours, and coordination and facilitation of dialogues between other
Cascade Agenda Leadership Cities Program member cities and other experts via
peer learning network.
b) STAFFING AND RESOURCES Cascade will dedicate 25 hours of staff time annually
to work directly with the City on community outreach and/or policy development,
as agreed upon by the parties.
c) ADDITIONAL SERVICES Should the City and Cascade determine specific
additional services to be desirable, such as for the implementation of the jointly
Packet Page 106 of 253
3
identified strategies, the parties would establish a separate contractual relationship
funded either by The City and/or outside grant sources.
4) TERM
THIS Agreement shall continue in effect until terminated. Either party may terminate
this Agreement by giving thirty days written notice to the other. The termination of
this Agreement shall not affect any other agreement that may be made by the parties
pursuant to this Agreement.
5) OTHER
(a) AUTHORITY. Each party to this Agreement, and each individual signing on
behalf of each party, hereby represents and warrants to the other that it has full
power and authority to enter into this Agreement and that its execution, delivery,
and performance of this Agreement has been fully authorized and approved, and
that no further approvals or consents are required to bind such party.
(b) INTEGRATED AGREEMENT; MODIFICATION. This Agreement constitutes the
entire agreement and understanding of the parties with respect to the subject
matter and supersedes all prior negotiations and representations. This Agreement
may not be modified except in writing signed by the parties.
(c) INTERPRETATION. Each party acknowledges that it and its legal counsel have
reviewed this Agreement. The parties agree that the terms and conditions of this
Agreement shall not be construed against any party on the basis of such party’s
drafting, in whole or in part, of such terms and conditions.
(d) CHOICE OF LAW & VENUE. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed
in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington without regard to conflict
of law provisions. The parties agree to submit to the jurisdiction of any state or
federal court within the State of Washington in any action or dispute resolution
process arising out of the terms, enforcement, or breach of this Agreement.
(e) ATTORNEYS' FEES. Should any legal action or proceeding be commenced by
either party in order to enforce this Agreement or any provision hereof, or in
connection with any alleged dispute, breach, default, or misrepresentation in
connection with any provision herein contained, the prevailing party shall be
entitled to recover reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in connection
with such action or proceeding, including costs of pursuing or defending any legal
action, including, without limitation, any on appeal, discovery or negotiation and
preparation of settlement arrangements, in addition to such other relief as may be
granted.
Packet Page 107 of 253
4
(f) SEVERABILITY. If any provision of this Agreement is held to be invalid or
unenforceable, such provision will not affect or invalidate the remainder of this
Agreement, and to this end the provisions of this Agreement are declared to be
severable. If such invalidity becomes known or apparent to the parties, the parties
agree to negotiate promptly in good faith in an attempt to amend such provision as
nearly as possible to be consistent with the intent of this Agreement.
(g) FACSIMILES. Facsimile transmission of any signed original document and
retransmission of any signed facsimile transmission shall be the same as delivery
or execution of an original. At the request of any party, the parties shall conform
facsimile transmitted signatures by signing an original document.
(h) COUNTERPARTS. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts,
each of which shall be deemed an original, and all of which counterparts together
shall constitute the same instrument which may be sufficiently evidenced by one
counterpart. Execution of this Agreement at different times and places by the
parties shall not affect the validity thereof so long as all the parties hereto execute
a counterpart of this Agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned duly authorized representatives of the parties
hereto have executed and delivered this Agreement as of the date first above written.
CASCADE LAND CONSERVANCY CITY OF EDMONDS
By: ___________________________
Name: ____________________
Title:
____________________
By:___________________________
Name: ____________________
Title:
____________________
615 Second Avenue Suite 525
Seattle WA 98104
121 5th Avenue N
Edmonds, WA 98020
Packet Page 108 of 253
Je
f
f
A
k
e
n
Ca
s
c
a
d
e
A
g
e
n
d
a
C
i
t
i
e
s
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
10
9
of
25
3
Lo
o
k
i
n
g
F
o
r
w
a
r
d
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
11
0
of
25
3
CU
R
R
E
N
T
L
A
N
D
U
S
E
SeattleTacoma
Ev
e
r
e
t
t
Ki
n
g
C
o
u
n
t
y
Ki
t
t
i
t
a
s
C
o
u
n
t
y
P
i
e
r
c
e
C
o
u
n
t
y
Sn
o
h
o
m
i
s
h
C
o
u
n
t
y
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
11
1
of
25
3
SeattleTacoma
Ev
e
r
e
t
t
Ki
n
g
C
o
u
n
t
y
Ki
t
t
i
t
a
s
C
o
u
n
t
y
P
i
e
r
c
e
C
o
u
n
t
y
Sn
o
h
o
m
i
s
h
C
o
u
n
t
y
21
0
0
A
L
T
E
R
N
A
T
I
V
E
F
U
T
U
R
E
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
11
2
of
25
3
SeattleTacoma
Ev
e
r
e
t
t
Ki
n
g
C
o
u
n
t
y
Ki
t
t
i
t
a
s
C
o
u
n
t
y
P
i
e
r
c
e
C
o
u
n
t
y
Sn
o
h
o
m
i
s
h
C
o
u
n
t
y
21
0
0
“
P
L
A
N
N
I
N
G
”
F
U
T
U
R
E
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
11
3
of
25
3
1.
S
a
v
e
o
u
r
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
e
•
1
m
i
l
l
i
o
n
a
c
r
e
s
p
r
i
v
a
t
e
f
o
r
e
s
t
s
a
n
d
fa
r
m
s
•
2
6
5
,
0
0
0
a
c
r
e
s
p
a
r
k
s
,
n
a
t
u
r
a
l
a
r
e
a
s
,
sh
o
r
e
l
i
n
e
s
2.
E
n
h
a
n
c
e
o
u
r
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
i
e
s
•
S
m
a
r
t
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
p
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
•
S
p
e
c
t
a
c
u
l
a
r
p
a
r
k
s
&
p
u
b
l
i
c
p
l
a
c
e
s
10
0
y
e
a
r
s
f
o
r
w
a
r
d
…
Ca
s
c
a
d
e
A
g
e
n
d
a
G
o
a
l
s
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
11
4
of
25
3
Ca
s
c
a
d
e
A
g
e
n
d
a
C
i
t
i
e
s
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
M
i
s
s
i
o
n
En
l
i
s
t
s
t
h
e
r
e
g
i
o
n
’
s
c
i
t
i
e
s
t
o
im
p
r
o
v
e
t
h
e
l
i
v
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
o
f
ne
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
s
-
-
-
m
a
k
i
n
g
th
e
m
co
m
p
l
e
t
e
,
co
m
p
a
c
t
an
d
co
n
n
e
c
t
e
d
--
-
sp
e
c
t
a
c
u
l
a
r
e
n
o
u
g
h
f
o
r
pe
o
p
l
e
t
o
c
h
o
o
s
e
t
o
l
i
v
e
th
e
r
e
,
s
a
v
i
n
g
t
h
e
r
e
g
i
o
n
’
s
na
t
u
r
a
l
a
n
d
w
o
r
k
i
n
g
l
a
n
d
s
fr
o
m
p
o
o
r
l
y
p
l
a
n
n
e
d
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
.
Be
l
m
o
n
t
D
a
i
r
y
,
P
o
r
t
l
a
n
d
,
O
r
e
g
o
n
P
h
o
t
o
fr
o
m
E
P
A
S
m
a
r
t
G
r
o
w
t
h
I
l
l
u
s
t
r
a
t
e
d
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
11
5
of
25
3
Ou
r
V
i
s
i
o
n
f
o
r
C
i
t
i
e
s
CO
M
P
A
C
T
CO
M
P
A
C
T
CO
M
P
L
E
T
E
CO
M
P
L
E
T
E
CO
N
N
E
C
T
E
D
CO
N
N
E
C
T
E
D
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
11
6
of
25
3
Fo
u
r
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
s
•
C
o
m
p
a
c
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
s
•
I
n
n
o
v
a
t
i
v
e
H
o
u
s
i
n
g
•
S
t
r
e
e
t
s
f
o
r
P
e
o
p
l
e
•
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
S
p
a
c
e
s
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
11
7
of
25
3
Ho
w
W
e
A
d
d
V
a
l
u
e
1)
W
e
e
d
u
c
a
t
e
p
a
r
t
n
e
r
c
i
t
i
e
s
a
b
o
u
t
w
h
a
t
i
t
t
a
k
e
s
to
b
e
c
o
m
e
a
t
r
u
l
y
l
i
v
a
b
l
e
c
i
t
y
.
2)
W
e
h
e
l
p
t
h
e
s
e
c
i
t
i
e
s
-
a
n
d
t
h
e
i
r
c
i
t
i
z
e
n
s
-
un
d
e
r
s
t
a
n
d
t
h
e
i
r
o
p
t
i
o
n
s
a
n
d
m
a
k
e
s
m
a
r
t
ch
o
i
c
e
s
f
o
r
f
u
t
u
r
e
g
r
o
w
t
h
.
3)
W
e
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
a
f
r
a
m
e
w
o
r
k
f
o
r
c
o
n
t
i
n
u
o
u
s
im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
a
n
d
s
h
a
r
i
n
g
b
e
s
t
p
r
a
c
t
i
c
e
s
t
h
a
t
en
a
b
l
e
s
c
i
t
i
e
s
t
o
m
a
k
e
t
h
e
i
r
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
i
e
s
b
e
t
t
e
r
an
d
b
e
t
t
e
r
.
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
11
8
of
25
3
Be
n
e
f
i
t
s
•
2
5
h
o
u
r
s
s
t
a
f
f
t
i
m
e
•
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
S
t
e
w
a
r
d
s
•
L
i
v
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
A
s
s
e
s
s
m
e
n
t
•
L
e
a
r
n
i
n
g
N
e
t
w
o
r
k
•
D
e
s
i
g
n
f
o
r
L
i
v
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
Sy
m
p
o
s
i
u
m
•
O
u
t
r
e
a
c
h
a
n
d
s
u
p
p
o
r
t
ar
o
u
n
d
q
u
a
l
i
t
y
o
f
l
i
f
e
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
11
9
of
25
3
Le
a
d
e
r
s
h
i
p
C
i
t
y
O
p
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
i
e
s
Ed
m
o
n
d
s
•
2
5
h
o
u
r
s
o
f
C
L
C
s
t
a
f
f
t
i
m
e
–
E
x
a
m
i
n
e
P
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
O
r
i
e
n
t
e
d
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
O
p
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
i
e
s
–
C
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
S
t
r
e
e
t
s
P
o
l
i
c
y
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
–
R
a
i
s
e
l
o
n
g
-
t
e
r
m
v
i
s
i
b
i
l
i
t
y
a
r
o
u
n
d
t
h
e
co
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
p
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
p
r
o
c
e
s
s
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
12
0
of
25
3
Fu
t
u
r
e
O
p
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
i
e
s
•
T
D
R
-
(
T
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
o
f
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
R
i
g
h
t
s
)
•G
r
e
e
n
C
i
t
y
Pa
r
t
n
e
r
s
h
i
p
•
C
i
v
i
c
E
n
g
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
12
1
of
25
3
Le
a
d
e
r
s
h
i
p
C
i
t
i
e
s
1.
T
a
c
o
m
a
2.
I
s
s
a
q
u
a
h
3.
K
i
r
k
l
a
n
d
4.
T
u
k
w
i
l
a
Me
m
b
e
r
C
i
t
i
e
s
•
B
u
c
k
l
e
y
•
B
u
r
i
e
n
•
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
•
E
l
l
e
n
s
b
u
r
g
•
L
y
n
n
w
o
o
d
•
M
i
l
l
C
r
e
e
k
•
M
o
u
n
t
l
a
k
e
T
e
r
r
a
c
e
•
S
h
o
r
e
l
i
n
e
•
S
n
o
h
o
m
i
s
h
•
S
a
m
m
a
m
i
s
h
Ca
s
c
a
d
e
A
g
e
n
d
a
C
i
t
i
e
s
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
12
2
of
25
3
Ne
x
t
S
t
e
p
s
Ed
m
o
n
d
s
•
P
a
r
t
n
e
r
s
h
i
p
a
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
be
t
w
e
e
n
C
i
t
y
a
n
d
C
L
C
•
A
n
n
u
a
l
m
e
m
b
e
r
s
h
i
p
f
e
e
•
P
a
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
e
i
n
l
e
a
r
n
i
n
g
ne
t
w
o
r
k
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
12
3
of
25
3
Th
a
n
k
Y
o
u
Je
f
f
A
k
e
n
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
M
a
n
a
g
e
r
,
C
a
s
c
a
d
e
Ag
e
n
d
a
C
i
t
i
e
s
je
f
f
a
@
c
a
s
c
a
d
e
l
a
n
d
.
o
r
g
20
6
.
9
0
5
.
6
9
2
8
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
12
4
of
25
3
P
a
c
k
e
t
P
a
g
e
1
2
5
o
f
2
5
3
P
a
c
k
e
t
P
a
g
e
1
2
6
o
f
2
5
3
7/28/2009 1
CASCADE AGENDA CITIES PROGRAM
EDMONDS
Project Scope
INTRODUCTION
Edmonds
Edmonds has taken a leadership role in the Puget Sound Region by creating policies and
programs to enhance the quality of life for current residents. By endorsing The Cascade
Agenda, Edmonds understands that careful planning benefits not only the city and its residents,
but helps protect natural and working lands in the region from poorly planned development.
Examples of this leadership include the Council’s 2009 goal to include a sustainability element in
the comprehensive plan updates and Resolution No. 1170, passed in 2008, that addressed
environmental principles and policy. By continuing to grow in a complete, compact and
connected manner, Edmonds can protect open space, promote economic development, and
make neighborhoods attractive, affordable places to live, work and raise a family. By becoming a
Cascade Agenda Leadership City, Edmonds and the Conservancy can further collaborate towards
enhancing livability and preserving the quality of life.
SCOPE OF WORK
Purpose
In agreeing to continue the partnership with Cascade Land Conservancy (CLC) to develop the
Cascade Agenda Cities program in Edmonds, the City has committed to working to advance
their strategic initiatives and the Cascade Agenda. CLC can assist Edmonds in working towards
its community vision by helping the city implement a variety of new tools and strategies. In
order for these tools and strategies to work, awareness needs to be created about how the
comprehensive plan, community vision and individual development projects relate.
If the Edmonds chooses to become a Cascade Agenda Cities Program Leadership City, CLC will
conduct a livability assessment as well as 25 hours of CLC staff time. As a member of the
Cascade Agenda Leadership Cities Program, the City will pay an annual fee of $5,000 and
receive 25 hours of CLC staff time annually. In partnership with the city, CLC proposes the
following scope of work.
1) Livability Assessment and Indicator Report This report is included in the Leadership
city program and allows a baseline observation of policies, ordinances and programs the city
is currently undertaking to grow in a complete, compact and connected manner along with a
demographic profile of the city. The indicator report makes the connection between
current policies and long-term community vision.
Work with Edmonds staff to complete livability assessment and follow-up interview
(Fall, 2009)
Produce indicator report outlining indicators and policies supportive of compact and
connected development. (Winter 2010)
Packet Page 127 of 253
7/28/2009 2
2) 25 Hours of staff time directed towards a project agreed upon by the City and
CLC. Four potential projects are identified below.
1. Urban Design in Downtown and Neighborhood Centers
CLC and guest speakers would host an event on urban design possibilities in the City of
Edmonds. This effort would be in the form of a field trip to nearby examples of high
quality design or a presentation and question/answer session to understand the role
design can play in future development and redevelopment in Edmonds.
2. Examine potential Transit Oriented Development Opportunities (TOD)
Examine opportunities and the outreach necessary to create walkable, livable
neighborhoods in close proximity to future transit stations and corridors in Edmonds.
a. Edmonds Crossing Multi-modal facility
b. 216th & 238th along Highway 99
c. Deliverables would include policy memo detailing findings and/or public meeting
on visioning around regional growth around future transit
3. Complete Streets Policy Development Building off of Edmonds draft
Comprehensive Transportation Plan, CLC would collaborate with the City of Edmonds
to create a Complete Streets ordinance that ensures Edmonds streets work for all
users, including pedestrians, cycling, transit and automobiles
a. Policy memo that includes best practices, policy resources and sample
ordinances from the Puget Sound Region
4. Raise Long-Term Visibility Around the Comprehensive Planning Process
Working in partnership with the City of Edmonds, the CLC will work to develop an
integrated community outreach strategy around growth and future development.
a. Outreach presentations to neighborhood and business groups beginning in
fall/winter of 2009-2010 and building awareness of land use and planning issues
leading up to the comprehensive plan updates culminating in 2011.
i. Connect Edmonds’s community vision to development regulations
within the City.
ii. Create connections to quality of life and livability over the period time
between creation of the community vision and development projects
within Edmonds.
FUTURE OPPORTUNITIES
Other CLC Services
1) Transfer of Development Rights – Partner with the City of Edmonds to create a
Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) program that, in conjunction with its other efforts,
supports residential and commercial growth in the city. A TDR program may be specific to
the city or may work with partner cities to jointly plan for development along transit
corridors. TDR program development depends on the scope, but generally falls between
$50-$80K for complete program development, which includes stakeholder outreach, policy
and economic analyses, draft policies and ordinance language, and process support,
2) Green City Partnerships – Form a public-private venture between the City of Edmonds
and CLC to develop a civic-based stewardship program including businesses, organizations,
and citizens for restoration of all of the urban forests and natural areas in the City. Green
City Partnerships build a comprehensive vision for urban forest restoration and long-term
Packet Page 128 of 253
7/28/2009 3
care by identifying present conditions, assessing current capacity, and providing a full
account of the resources required to realize this vision in a 20-year strategic plan of action
for each city. The long-term strategy embodied in this plan for Edmonds then becomes the
driving force to engage community groups and build a network of support to achieve
citywide forest and natural area restoration goals.
The Green City Partnerships have three main objectives:
Connect people to nature and improve the quality of life in cities by restoring
urban forests and other urban open spaces;
Galvanize an informed, involved, and active community around urban forest
restoration and stewardship; and
Improve urban forest health, and enhance urban forest long-term sustainability,
by removing invasive plants, re-establishing native plant communities and
maintaining functional native forests.
Costs:
The cost of initiating a Green City Partnership vary by each city’s needs, current staffing
resources, availability of data, and existing levels of volunteer-based restoration activities. The
Cascade Land Conservancy will work each city to meet its specific needs, including placement of
each effort within the appropriate phase of the Green City Partnership lifecycle, as well as
possibilities for partnering in grant and other funding opportunities.
Services Estimated Costs Benefits
Green City Partnership Planning Phases
Baseline Assessment $20,000 - $30,000 Starting point for program, ability to plan
for specific restoration needs
Capacity Assessment
$20,000 - $30,000
Identification of existing resources and
methods to increase efficiency, reduce
redundancy, and improve existing
programs
20-Year Plan $40,000 - $55,000
Development of long-term plan to lead
partnership, ensuring sustainability of
program
Sub-Total Planning $80,000 - $105,000
Green City Partnership Implementation Phases
Engage Community $25,000 - $35,000 Cornerstone of Green City Partnership,
local community is engaged
Forest Steward Network $20,000 - $30,000
Gold-star of community engagement,
multiplication of efforts, community is
true partner, citizens feel ownership of
program
Sub-Total Implementation $45,000 - $65,000
Full Green City Partnership
Planning and Implementation
$125,000 -
$180,000
Green City Partnership Network
(annual) $12,000
Access to updated information and
resources, collaboration with Green City
Partnership network, participation in
Packet Page 129 of 253
7/28/2009 4
larger effort
On-going Program Management [In development]
Packet Page 130 of 253
AM-2633 2.H.
Contract for Services with Sustainable Edmonds
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:12/01/2009
Submitted By:Rob Chave
Submitted For:Council President Wilson Time:Consent
Department:Planning Type:Action
Review Committee:
Committee Action:
Information
Subject Title
Authorization for Mayor to sign a contract for services with Sustainable Edmonds.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Approve the agreement, and allocate $5,000 from Council contingency funds.
Previous Council Action
None specifically on this subject. See the discussion in the agreement regarding related actions the
city has taken.
Narrative
Sustainable Edmonds, a local non-profit organization, is proposing to undertake a partnership with
the city to help achieve "a sustainable natural and built environment." Specifically, Sustainable
Edmonds is proposing a multi-year project aimed at (1) establishing a system for tracking and
reporting energy use over time, (2) holding community educational program meetings, (3)
identifying funding programs to assist community members to lower the upfront cost of making
buildings more energy efficient, (4) conducting a one year pilot project to demonstrate energy
savings, (5) expanding the pilot project to a community-wide program, and (6) expanding the pilot
project to include renewable energy installations in addition to energy efficiency retrofits. Items
(1) through (4) will be undertaken during the first year of the agreement between the City and
Sustainable Edmonds, while items (5) and (6) will be undertaken in the following years if the
needed resources are agreed upon. If the agreement is approved, the City would agree to
contribute $5,000 toward the first year of this effort.
Fiscal Impact
Fiscal Year:2009
Revenue:
Expenditure:5,000
Fiscal Impact:
Attachments
Link: Exhibit 1: Proposed Agreement
Packet Page 131 of 253
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 11/20/2009 09:52 AM APRV
2 Mayor Sandy Chase 11/20/2009 01:56 PM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 11/20/2009 01:59 PM APRV
Form Started By: Rob
Chave
Started On: 11/20/2009 08:56
AM
Final Approval Date: 11/20/2009
Packet Page 132 of 253
MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT CREATING A FRAMEWORK FOR COOPERATION
This memorandum of Agreement (“Agreement”) is entered into by and between the City
of Edmonds, Washington, a municipal corporation of the State of Washington (“the
City”) and Sustainable Edmonds, a Washington non-profit corporation (“SE”), to
establish a framework of collaboration through which the parties will advance their
mutual interest by undertaking projects aimed at achieving a sustainable natural and built
environment.
WHEREAS the City endorsed the U.S. Mayors’ Climate Protection Agreement by
Resolution 1129 of September 2006, committing itself to a five-step process:
- Conduct an emissions inventory and forecast
- Set greenhouse gas reduction target
- Develop an action plan to achieve the target
- Implement the plan
- Monitor and evaluate progress;
WHEREAS the City, by Resolution 1130 of September 2006, joined the International
Council for Local Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI), committed to participating in the
Cities for Climate Protection Campaign, and pledged to take a “leadership role in
promoting public awareness about the causes and impacts of climate change;
WHEREAS the City established a Mayor’s Climate Protection Committee as a vehicle
for overseeing the five-step process;
WHEREAS Sustainable Edmonds, a volunteer citizens’ group, was incorporated in 2009
for the purpose of building a sustainable future for Edmonds by understanding and acting
at both the personal and community levels on the challenges arising from climate change,
energy sources and conservation, building and land use, transportation, food and water
supply, and related issues; and
WHEREAS the City and SE believe that SE can play a significant role in assisting the
City to carry out the promotion of public awareness and the implementation of its plans
with respect to the commitments the City has made in the area of climate change and
other aspects of sustainability;
NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Edmonds and Sustainable Edmonds agree as follows:
1) AGREEMENT TO COOPERATE
By making this agreement, the parties intend to establish a framework of
collaboration in the areas discussed below. Each specific project or endeavor
undertaken by the parties under this agreement will be separately negotiated and may
Packet Page 133 of 253
be the subject of separate binding contracts in a form appropriate to the subject.
Nothing in this Agreement is intended to bind either party to any specific project or
endeavor or to create any recourse by either party against the other.
2) CITY OF EDMONDS ROLE
a. STRATEGY IDENTFICATION. The City will complete and adopt a Climate
Action Plan to identify the policies and ordinances aimed at promoting
sustainability with respect to actions within its authority to take with respect to
mitigating the impacts of climate change and other aspects of sustainability.
b. COLLABORATION IN PLANNING FOR IMPLEMENTATON. The City
will work with SE to plan for the actions to be taken by SE to meet City
climate action, energy efficiency, and related sustainability objectives, so that
a mutual understanding and agreement is reached.
c. STAFFING AND RESOURCES. The City will commit appropriate staffing
and resources to facilitate communication and collaboration between SE and
any City staff whose role is important to SE’s ability to meet its commitments
under this agreement.
d. FEE PAYMENT. The City will pay the total fee agreed in SE’s proposal
document no later than 30 days after the execution of the Agreement by both
parties, as well as any additional fees agreed between the parties for
modifications and/or annual renewals of the terms of the Agreement.
3) SUSTAINABLE EDMONDS ROLE
a. PROVISION OF SERVICES. SE will provide project management and
public outreach services to the City to aid in the implementation of the City’s
climate action, energy efficiency, and related sustainability objectives as
agreed in SE’s proposal (see Exhibit A, attached) to the City and in
collaboration as described in 2)b) above.
b. STAFFING AND RESOURCES. SE will dedicate sufficient time of its
volunteers to complete the work outlined in SE’s proposal to the City and in
any further amendments and/or renewals that may be mutually agreed upon in
the future.
4) TERM
This Agreement shall continue in effect until terminated. Either party may terminate
this Agreement by giving thirty days written notice to the other, provided however,
that termination of the Agreement shall not impair SE’s ability to pay for products or
services that SE may have ordered in good faith but not yet paid for. The City agrees
to pay for those products or services it specifically ordered for the City prior to the
thirty day written notice.
Packet Page 134 of 253
Written notices shall be sent to:
If to the City: Name of Person who takes Service and Address
If to SE: Priya Cloutier, Karr Tuttle Campbell, 1201 3rd Ave., Seattle, WA 98101
5) OTHER
a. AUTHORITY. Each party to this agreement, and each individual signing on
behalf of each party, hereby represents and warrants to the other that it has full
power and authority to enter into this Agreement and that its execution,
delivery, and performance of this Agreement has been fully authorized and
approved, and that no further approvals or consents are required to bind such
party.
b. INTEGRATED AGREEMENT; MODIFICATION. This Agreement
constitutes the entire agreement and understanding of the parties with respect
to the subject matter and supersedes all prior negotiations and representations.
This Agreement may not be modified except in writing signed by both parties.
c. INTERPRETATION. Each party acknowledges that it and its legal counsel
have reviewed this Agreement. The parties agree that the terms and
conditions of this Agreement shall not be construed against any party on the
basis of such party’s drafting, in whole or in part, of such terms and
conditions.
d. CHOICE OF LAW & VENUE. This Agreement shall be governed by and
construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington without
regard to conflict of law provisions. The parties agree to submit to the
jurisdiction of any court within the State of Washington, County of
Snohomish, in any action or dispute resolution process arising out of the
terms, enforcement, or breach of this Agreement.
e. ATTORNEY’S FEES. Should any legal action or proceeding be commenced
by either party in order to enforce this Agreement or any provision thereof, or
in connection with any alleged dispute, breach, default, or misrepresentation
in connection with any provision herein contained, the prevailing party shall
be entitled to recover reasonable attorney’s fees and costs incurred in
connection with such action or proceeding, including costs of pursuing or
defending any legal action, including, without limitation, any on appeal,
discovery or negotiation and preparation of settlement arrangements, in
addition to such other relief as may be granted.
f. SEVERABILITY. If any provision of this Agreement is held to be invalid or
unenforceable, such provision will not affect or invalidate the remainder of
this Agreement, and to this end the provisions of this Agreement are declared
to be severable. If such invalidity becomes known or apparent to the parties,
the parties agree to negotiate promptly in good faith in an attempt to amend
Packet Page 135 of 253
such provision as nearly as possible to be consistent with the intent of this
Agreement.
g. FACSIMILES. Facsimile transmission of any signed original document and
retransmission of any signed facsimile transmission shall be the same as
delivery or execution of an original. At the request of any party, the parties
shall conform facsimile transmitted signatures by signing an original
document.
h. COUNTERPARTS. This Agreement may be executed in one or more
counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, and all of which
counterparts together shall constitute the same instrument which may be
sufficiently evidenced by one counterpart. Execution of this Agreement at
different times and places by the parties shall not affect the validity thereof so
long as the parties hereto execute a counterpart of this Agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned duly authorized representatives of the parties
hereto have executed and delivered this Agreement as of the date first above written.
SUSTAINABLE EDMONDS CITY OF EDMONDS
By: ______________________________ By:_________________________
Name: ____________________________ Name:_______________________
Title: Title:
__________________________________ _____________________________
8302 188th Street S.W. 121 5th Avenue North
Edmonds, WA 98027-6025 Edmonds, WA 98020
Packet Page 136 of 253
Exhibit A
Save Energy Now!
Proposal to the City of Edmonds
I. Introduction
The City of Edmonds proclaimed its commitment to reduce its carbon footprint in
2006 by adopting the U.S. Mayors’ Climate Protection Agreement, joining the
International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI), and establishing
the Mayor’s Climate Protection Committee. The Edmonds Climate Change Action
Plan, prepared by the Committee in 2009, sets major goals for the City in the
reduction of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. One of the major sources of GHG
emissions is the burning of fossil fuels to provide heat, power, and hot water for
buildings. The necessary reductions can be achieved through conservation and
efficient use of energy and through increased use of energy from renewable sources.
II. Purpose
A major challenge facing the City in achieving its GHG reduction goals is that nearly
47% of GHG emissions stem from buildings, but most buildings are privately owned..
As a result, the City can only achieve its goals with respect to buildings either by
passing laws (taxes, codes, etc.) or by gaining the understanding and voluntary
cooperation of building owners and tenants. The City, however, lacks the resources
necessary to educate its citizens on the need and to enlist them in programs of action.
Realizing the desirability of the voluntary cooperation route, a group of citizens of
Edmonds established a non-profit organization, Sustainable Edmonds, to promote
voluntary action to help achieve the City’s climate change and energy goals .
Sustainable Edmonds has recently become aware that the City has received a federal
energy efficiency grant. As Sustainable Edmonds has been presenting public
educational programs to promote energy efficiency, it appears that it is timely to
undertake a cooperative project to further the objectives of both organizations.
Packet Page 137 of 253
III. Expertise and Capabilities
Sustainable Edmonds has member expertise in energy efficiency and renewable
energy systems, as well as working relationships with companies, public utilities and
other organizations active in this field.
Among the directors of Sustainable Edmonds are present or former nuclear engineers;
managers of environmental, aerospace, and other scientific and technical information
services; specialists in residential building design and construction including
sustainable (green) buildings; renewable (solar) energy; corporate finance;
journalism, public information, and community relations; and a member of the
Edmonds Planning Board.
With its technical and organizational experience, Sustainable Edmonds believes that
it can assist the City to begin to achieve the City’s stated climate action goals while
benefiting the residents and businesses in Edmonds and promoting environmental and
economic security for generations to come. Additional background on Sustainable
Edmonds may be found in Exhibit B.
IV. Project Description
Sustainable Edmonds proposes a multi-year project aimed at (1) establishing a system
for tracking and reporting energy use over time, (2) holding community educational
program meetings, (3) identifying funding programs to assist community members to
lower the upfront cost of making buildings more energy efficient, (4) conducting a
one year pilot project to demonstrate energy savings, (5) expanding the pilot project
to a community-wide program, and (6) expanding the pilot project to include
renewable energy installations in addition to energy efficiency retrofits. Items (1)
through (4) will be undertaken during the first year of the agreement between the City
and Sustainable Edmonds, while items (5) and (6) will be undertaken in the following
years if the needed resources are agreed upon.
V. Scope of Work
a. Establish a system for tracking and reporting city-wide energy consumption
over time. Partner with the City on building and developing an energy
usage tracking database. Build on and coordinate with the City’s energy
metering and online energy consumption tracking project.
i. Select metrics for pilot project.
ii. Design and maintain a Save Energy Now! (SEN!) database.
Packet Page 138 of 253
b. Continue Sustainable Edmonds community educational program meetings
on energy efficiency and renewable energy.
i. Energy Efficiency Lecture Series - Four-part series of energy efficiency
meetings through Edmonds Parks & Recreation program (January-
February 2010).
ii. Conduct meetings to inform Edmonds residents about community
energy efficiency and renewable energy programs in other communities.
iii. Present “How To DIY” workshops for those wanting to pick the low-
hanging, energy-saving fruit but not participate in the full energy audit
and energy savings upgrade program.
c. Identify and report on funding programs to assist community members to
lower the upfront cost of making buildings more energy efficient.
i. Local utility (PUD and PSE) incentives.
ii. State and federal incentives [e.g. Climate Bill - $4,500 for 30% energy
savings (pending)].
iii. Low cost energy loans through municipal bonds [“Property-Assessed
Community Energy (PACE)” bonds].
d. SEN! Phase I Pilot Project – (January 1-Dec 31, 2010).
i. Establish baseline energy usage with 10 Edmonds residents and 10
Edmonds businesses.
1. Develop selection criteria.
2. Solicit for volunteer participants.
3. Identify best opportunities with utilities.
4. Select 10 residences and 10 businesses for pilot project.
5. Create and sign agreements with participants.
ii. Divide energy savings upgrade programs into two classes:
1. Do-it-yourself (DIY) by the energy consumer (CFLs, caulking,
door seals, etc).
2. Professional contractor (blown-in insulation, HVAC
tuning/replacement, etc).
Packet Page 139 of 253
iii. Perform energy audits using certified auditors funded by a combination
of fees to the energy consumer and federal and/or local energy grants, if
available (see budget), to identify the most significant energy savings
upgrade opportunities.
1. Implement those auditor-recommended energy-saving programs
estimated to achieve at least 30% reductions in energy use.
2. Determine minimum qualifications, minimum experience, and
other selection criteria for auditors.
3. Solicit and evaluate requests for quote (RFQs) for Energy
Auditors.
4. Include participation agreements with RFQ.
5. Compile list of qualified contractors for energy savings upgrade
work (Edmonds preferred).
iv. Perform audits of the 10 residences and 10 businesses.
v. Track monthly energy usage.
1. City wide data.
2. Pilot participant data (begins March 1, 2010).
vi. Report outcome of pilot project.
1. Compare trend lines between city-wide and pilot participants pre-
& post-project.
2. Conduct a cost benefit analysis of energy savings upgrades.
3. Prepare an internal review of results and lessons learned.
4. Review results with Climate Protection Committee.
5. Report results to City Council.
6. Promote results via SE website and press release to public media.
7. Develop plan for Phase II rollout.
VI. Future Projects
a. SEN! Phase II City-wide Rollout (Depending on funding for future years).
Packet Page 140 of 253
(Expand Phase I Program to a city-wide basis, incorporating modifications
from lessons learned and any large scale requirements/limitations.)
b. Community Solar Project.
VII. Deliverables for Phase I
Sustainable Edmonds will deliver reports within two weeks of the end of each
calendar quarter on the progress of the four project elements scheduled for Phase
I.
VIII. Budget
Track city-wide energy consumption $0 – SE
Volunteers
Select 10 residences and 10 businesses for pilot project.
$0 – SE
Volunteers
Design and maintain SEN! Database and Metrics for Pilot Project.
$1,000
Solicit and evaluate requests for quote (RFQs) for Energy Auditors.
$0 – SE
Volunteers
Compile list of qualified contractors for energy savings upgrade work
(Edmonds preferred)
$0 – SE
Volunteers
Generate reports of Phase I program results $1,000
Energy Audit Subsidy (20ea - $150 of $250 total cost) $3,000
TOTAL $5,000
Packet Page 141 of 253
Exhibit B
Sustainable Edmonds Background
Sustainable Edmonds is an independent local citizens' organization, formed in 2008, in
Edmonds, Washington. It is incorporated as a non-profit organization in the State of
Washington.
Sustainable Edmonds is open to all who are interested in the many facets of
sustainability. The impetus for Sustainable Edmonds came from the realization by
citizen members and observers of the Mayor’s Climate Protection Committee that there
could be a complementary role for a separate citizens’ group. Such a group could work to
achieve objectives now stated on our welcome page.
Our mission is to help Edmonds to become ecologically, economically and socially
sustainable. As a citizens' organization we seek to bring together people in Edmonds who
are concerned with understanding and acting on the challenges arising from climate
change, energy, building and land use, food supply, and related issues. We recognize that
we are a community with diverse viewpoints on such issues and we will try to achieve
workable outcomes that will help us to achieve a sustainable future.
Our objectives are:
- to collect and disseminate information about topics related to sustainability.
- to raise public awareness of the environmental, economic, and social challenges facing
Edmonds as a result of climate change.
- to facilitate the development of skills, knowledge and resources that will be needed for a
sustainable local community.
- to develop a conviction that citizens have the power to bring about significant change.
- to support and strengthen ties between residents of Edmonds and the City, County, and
State.
- to build and communicate a compelling case for action to create or enhance needed
policies and infrastructure.
- to take individual and collective action, in whatever ways we each can, to serve as an
example of sustainable local community citizenship.
- to work with other organizations that share common goals.
Why are we doing this?
Sustainability is about meeting the needs of the present without compromising the ability
of future generations to meet their own needs.
Now, in the early part of the 21st century, there is growing global concern that we are on
a path of unsustainability resulting from:
Packet Page 142 of 253
- the growth of world population and its concentration in sprawling cities
- the consumption of finite natural resources, such as soil, water, wood, and minerals,
toward a diminishing point
- the use of the atmosphere and the oceans beyond their carrying capacities as sinks
for greenhouse gases, especially from the burning of fossil fuels
- increasingly rapid warming of the global climate caused by the accumulation of
greenhouse gases.
Aren’t these concerns so enormous that they must be dealt with by world and national
leaders and by scientific experts?
We say, no, not entirely. There is an important role that individuals and local
communities can and must play in finding and implementing solutions. Our role in places
like Edmonds is to adapt our personal decisions and our community institutions so that
we contribute to the world’s return to a sustainable course.
Our website is at http://www.SustainableEdmonds.org.
Sustainable Edmonds Board of Directors
Robert Freeman, President
Mark Mays, Vice President
Todd Cloutier, Secretary
Richard Bisbee, Treasurer
Janice Freeman
Wes Gallaugher
Chris Herman
Lance Regan
Teresa Wippel
Packet Page 143 of 253
AM-2618 3.
Presentation by WSDOT Ferries
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:12/01/2009
Submitted By:Stephen Clifton Time:20 Minutes
Department:Community Services Type:Information
Review Committee:
Committee Action:
Information
Subject Title
Presentation by WSDOT Ferries Division Assistant Secretary David Mosley - Update on
Vehicle Reservations Pre-Design Study.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Previous Council Action
Narrative
Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) Ferries Division Assistant Secretary
David Mosley will be presenting an update on the Vehicle Reservations Pre-Design Study.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
No file(s) attached.
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 11/19/2009 03:00 PM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 11/19/2009 05:22 PM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 11/20/2009 08:38 AM APRV
Form Started By: Stephen
Clifton
Started On: 11/17/2009 01:13
PM
Final Approval Date: 11/20/2009
Packet Page 144 of 253
AM-2628 4.
Hearing Examiner Annual Report
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:12/01/2009
Submitted By:Sandy Chase Time:15 Minutes
Department:City Clerk's Office Type:Information
Review Committee:
Committee Action:
Information
Subject Title
Annual Report - Hearing Examiner
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Information only.
Previous Council Action
N/A
Narrative
The city contracts with Toweill Rice Taylor LLC for Hearing Examiner services. Representatives
from the firm will be present to give their annual report.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
No file(s) attached.
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 11/19/2009 03:14 PM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 11/19/2009 05:22 PM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 11/20/2009 08:38 AM APRV
Form Started By: Sandy
Chase
Started On: 11/19/2009 03:13
PM
Final Approval Date: 11/20/2009
Packet Page 145 of 253
AM-2629 5.
Prosecutor Annual Report
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:12/01/2009
Submitted By:Sandy Chase Time:15 Minutes
Department:City Clerk's Office Type:Information
Review Committee:
Committee Action:
Information
Subject Title
Annual Report - Prosecutor
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Information only.
Previous Council Action
N/A
Narrative
The city contracts with Zachor & Thomas, Attorneys at Law, for Prosecutor services.
Representatives from the firm will be present to give their annual report.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
No file(s) attached.
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 11/19/2009 03:18 PM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 11/19/2009 05:22 PM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 11/20/2009 08:38 AM APRV
Form Started By: Sandy
Chase
Started On: 11/19/2009 03:17
PM
Final Approval Date: 11/20/2009
Packet Page 146 of 253
AM-2631 6.
Report on Thuesen Subdivision, Alley Vacation and Reidy Enforcement Action
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:12/01/2009
Submitted By:Sandy Chase Time:45 Minutes
Department:City Clerk's Office Type:Information
Review Committee:
Committee Action:
Information
Subject Title
Report from the City Attorney regarding the Thuesen subdivision, alley way vacation and
Reidy enforcement action.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Previous Council Action
Narrative
Scott Snyder, City Attorney, will provide a report at the City Council meeting concerning the
above referenced subject.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
No file(s) attached.
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 11/19/2009 03:53 PM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 11/19/2009 05:22 PM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 11/20/2009 08:39 AM APRV
Form Started By: Sandy
Chase
Started On: 11/19/2009 03:43
PM
Final Approval Date: 11/20/2009
Packet Page 147 of 253
AM-2622 7.
Public Hearing on Capital Facilities Plan Element Update
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:12/01/2009
Submitted By:Kim Karas
Submitted For:Noel Miller Time:30 Minutes
Department:Public Works Type:Action
Review Committee:
Committee Action:
Information
Subject Title
Public Hearing on Capital Facilities Plan Element update for 2010 – 2015 to City’s
Comprehensive Plan. The proposal updates the city's capital facilities plan to include
improvements, additions, upgrades or extensions of City infrastructure such as
transportation, parks, storm water, sewer, and water systems along with other public
facilities necessary to implement the City's Comprehensive Plan; incorporates projects from
the recently updated Transportation and Parks Plan Elements; and, separates the
maintenance, replacement and preservation projects from the Capital Facilities Plan
Element and into a separate capital improvements plan.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Approve the Capital Facilities Plan Element Update including any Council recommended
modifications.
Previous Council Action
On August 18, 2008, the 2008 - 2014 Capital Facilities Plan Update was approved.
Narrative
The City’s Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) Element is a document updated annually and identifies
capital projects for at least the next six years which support the City’s Comprehensive Plan. Staff
has modified the process to update the CFP in 2009 based on recommendations from the City
Attorney and the Finance Department. From a legal standpoint, the Capital Facilities Plan Element
needs to address infrastructure projects that support the City’s goals under the Growth
Management Act. Thus, in a change from past practice, this year’s CFP will focus only on capital
improvement projects and will not include projects that involve the preservation and replacement
of existing City infrastructure (i.e. projects related to normal operations and maintenance).
Focusing the CFP on capital improvements has helped to simplify the element. You will see that
while this year’s CFP includes a number of transportation, storm water, facilities and parks
projects, no projects are listed for the City’s water and sewer utilities as these facilities are built out
to accommodate the expected population growth and no additional capital improvement projects
are required in the current water and sewer plans to provide added capacity for these systems.
Attached are the spreadsheets for the 2010 – 2015 Capital Facilities Plan Element update. In
addition, the spreadsheets include significant projects for transportation, parks and general needs
Packet Page 148 of 253
with a planning horizon out to 2030. Project description sheets have been prepared and are
included in the agenda packet for your review. In addition staff has provided spreadsheets for the
total 2009-2015 Capital Improvement Programs, which includes both capital improvements
included in the CFP along with preservation and replacement projects.
Funding sources for the various projects are as follows:
Fund Description/Purpose Division
Manager
Comprehensive
Plan Source of Funds
112
Combined Street
Construction
Improvement
- Arterial Projects
Engineering
Transportation
Comprehensive
Plan (2009)
Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax,
Federal & State
Transportation, Grants,
Utility Transfers
& Traffic Impact Fees
113 Multimodal
Transportation
Community
Services
Federal & State
Appropriations and
Grants
125
Parks, Open Space,
Recreation &
Beautification
Parks &
Recreation
Parks &
Recreation & Open
Space Plan
Real Estate Excise Tax,
Contributions from
Developers
125 Transportation (REET2) Engineering
Transportation
Comprehensive
Plan (2009)
Real Estate Excise Tax
& Grants
126 Special Capital
Purchases & Acquisitions
Parks &
Recreation
Parks &
Recreation & Open
Space Plan
Real Estate Excise Tax
& Grants
129 SR 99 - International
District
Parks &
Recreation
Economic
Development
Comprehensive
Plan
Grants
132 Parks Construction Parks &
Recreation
Parks, Recreation
& Open Space Plan Grants
412-200
Combined Utility
Construction
Improvement - Drainage
Projects
Engineering
Storm water
Comprehensive
Plan (2003)
Combined Utility,
PWTF Loans & Grants
A public hearing was held by the Planning Board on November 4, 2009, for the Capital Facilities
Plan Element Update. Concerns were expressed by the Citizen Advisory Committee for
Transportation that currently there is not sufficient funding for many of the transportation projects
in particular. The committee believes that transportation funding should be one of the City's
highest priorities because citizens, businesses and public safety depend on a good transportation
system. Continuing not to establish and dedicate sufficient funding sources for transportation
projects will lead to the continued deterioration of the City's roadways, increase traffic congestion,
delay needed walkway projects, reduce the ability of the City to leverage grants, and increase the
Packet Page 149 of 253
delay needed walkway projects, reduce the ability of the City to leverage grants, and increase the
City's liability exposure.
The Board stated that members and citizens are very interested in identifying projects that
improve pedestrian as well as vehicular access to the waterfront. There was also interest in
moving forward with projects involving the protecting and enhancement of the Edmond's Marsh
and the daylighting of Willow Creek.
In 2010, staff recommends further discussion on establishing adequate funding sources for
transportation including a voter approved increase in the Transportation Benefit District fee to fund
capital projects. Also in 2010, increases to the Water and Storm water utility rates will be
presented to the City Council to fund the Capital Improvement Projects which will be part of the 6
year comprehensive plan updates.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: Exhibit 1 - Final Six-Year (2010-2015) CFP
Link: Exhibit 2 - Combined CIP 2009-2015
Link: Exhibit 3 - Parks
Link: Exhibit 4 - stormwater
Link: Exhibit 5 - Transportation
Link: Exhibit 6 - Comments
Link: Exhibit 7 - Transportation Committee Comments
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 11/19/2009 02:59 PM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 11/19/2009 05:22 PM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 11/20/2009 08:38 AM APRV
Form Started By: Kim
Karas
Started On: 11/18/2009 10:01
AM
Final Approval Date: 11/20/2009
Packet Page 150 of 253
Ci
t
y
o
f
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
(
2
0
1
0
-
2
0
1
5
)
Tr
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
Tr
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
-
R
o
a
d
w
a
y
Gr
a
n
t
O
p
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
y
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
(
2
0
1
0
-
2
0
1
5
)
F
u
n
d
i
n
g
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
N
a
m
e
P
u
r
p
o
s
e
G
r
a
n
t
/
D
a
t
e
P
h
a
s
e
T
o
t
a
l
C
o
s
t
S
o
u
r
c
e
2
0
1
0
2
0
1
1
2
0
1
2
2
0
1
3
2
0
1
4
2
0
1
5
80
t
h
A
v
e
n
u
e
W
e
s
t
A
n
a
l
y
z
e
8
0
t
h
A
v
e
n
u
e
W
e
s
t
f
o
r
v
e
h
i
c
l
e
,
b
i
c
y
c
l
e
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
$
0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
)
Si
g
h
t
D
i
s
t
a
n
c
e
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
s
a
f
e
t
y
.
L
o
c
a
l
F
u
n
d
s
O
n
l
y
&
$
0
(
S
t
a
t
e
)
$2
2
0
,
0
0
0
(
S
i
t
e
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
e
r
)
$
2
2
0
,
0
0
0
Co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
$
7
2
,
0
0
0
(
L
o
c
a
l
)
$
7
2
,
0
0
0
SR
5
2
4
(
1
9
6
t
h
S
t
.
S
W
)
/
D
e
s
i
g
n
i
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
o
s
s
i
b
l
e
G
r
a
n
t
D
e
s
i
g
n
$
0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
)
88
t
h
A
v
e
W
.
I
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
&
$
7
5
,
0
0
0
(
S
t
a
t
e
,
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$
7
5
,
0
0
0
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
Lo
c
a
l
F
u
n
d
s
$
8
0
,
0
0
0
(Lo
c
a
l
,
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
I
m
p
a
c
t
F
e
e
s
)
$80,000
Co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
Co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
$
0
(F
e
d
e
r
a
l
)
Po
s
s
i
b
l
e
G
r
a
n
t
$5
3
6
,
0
0
0
(
S
t
a
t
e
,
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$536,000
&
T
B
D
$1
0
0
,
0
0
0
(Lo
c
a
l
,
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
I
m
p
a
c
t
F
e
e
s
)
$100,000
$8
8
,
0
0
0
(
T
B
D
,
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$88,000
21
2
t
h
/
8
4
t
h
(
5
C
o
r
n
e
r
s
)
De
s
i
g
n
i
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
En
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
$
2
7
0
,
0
0
0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
,
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$270,000
In
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
Po
s
s
i
b
l
e
G
r
a
n
t
$0
(S
t
a
t
e
)
$1
0
0
,
0
0
0
(Lo
c
a
l
,
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
I
m
p
a
c
t
F
e
e
s
)
$100,000
Co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
Co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
$
1
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
,
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$1,000,000
Po
s
s
i
b
l
e
G
r
a
n
t
$0
(S
t
a
t
e
)
&
$
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
(Lo
c
a
l
,
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
I
m
p
a
c
t
F
e
e
s
)
$100,000
TB
D
$
4
4
0
,
0
0
0
(
T
B
D
,
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$440,000
76
t
h
A
v
.
W
@
2
1
2
t
h
S
t
.
S
W
I
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
R
e
-
d
e
s
i
g
n
i
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
t
o
m
a
k
e
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
s
i
g
n
a
l
w
o
r
k
$
0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
)
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
m
o
r
e
e
f
f
i
c
i
e
n
t
l
y
a
n
d
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
t
h
e
c
a
p
a
c
i
t
y
/
l
e
v
e
l
P
o
s
s
i
b
l
e
G
r
a
n
t
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
$
1
8
9
,
0
0
0
(
S
t
a
t
e
,
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$189,000
of
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
o
f
t
h
e
i
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
.
$
8
1
,
0
0
0
(
L
o
c
a
l
)
$81,000
Po
s
s
i
b
l
e
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
$
2
4
5
,
0
0
0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
,
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$
2
4
5
,
0
0
0
22
8
t
h
S
t
.
S
W
.
C
o
r
r
i
d
o
r
S
a
f
e
t
y
R
e
a
l
i
g
n
h
i
g
h
l
y
s
k
e
w
e
d
i
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
G
r
a
n
t
$
0
(
S
t
a
t
e
)
to
a
d
d
r
e
s
s
s
a
f
e
t
y
a
n
d
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
;
$
1
4
1
,
0
0
0
(
L
o
c
a
l
)
$
3
1
,
0
0
0
$
1
1
0
,
0
0
0
in
c
l
u
d
e
s
n
e
w
s
i
g
n
a
l
@
S
R
9
9
/
2
2
8
t
h
P
o
s
s
i
b
l
e
G
r
a
n
t
&
R
O
W
$
1
8
5
,
0
0
0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
,
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$
1
8
5
,
0
0
0
TB
D
$
8
5
,
0
0
0
(
T
B
D
,
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$
8
5
,
0
0
0
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
Po
s
s
i
b
l
e
G
r
a
n
t
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
$
3
,
1
0
7
,
0
0
0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
,
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$3,107,000
&
$
0
(
S
t
a
t
e
)
TB
D
$
0
(
L
o
c
a
l
)
$3
4
5
,
0
0
0
(
T
B
D
,
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$345,000
Wa
l
n
u
t
S
t
.
@
9
t
h
A
v
.
S
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
S
i
g
n
a
l
I
n
s
t
a
l
l
a
t
i
o
n
P
o
s
s
i
b
l
e
G
r
a
n
t
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
$
0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
)
&
&
$
3
9
0
,
0
0
0
(
S
t
a
t
e
,
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$
7
5
,
0
0
0
$
3
1
5
,
0
0
0
TB
D
$
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
(Lo
c
a
l
,
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
I
m
p
a
c
t
F
e
e
s
)
$100,000
Co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
$
3
8
5
,
0
0
0
(
T
B
D
,
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$
7
5
,
0
0
0
$
3
1
0
,
0
0
0
Ma
i
n
S
t
.
@
9
t
h
A
v
.
I
n
s
t
a
l
l
s
i
g
n
a
l
a
t
i
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
t
o
r
e
d
u
c
e
i
n
j
u
r
y
a
n
d
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
$
0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
)
pr
o
p
e
r
t
y
d
a
m
a
g
e
a
c
c
i
d
e
n
t
s
P
o
s
s
i
b
l
e
G
r
a
n
t
,
L
o
c
a
l
&
$
5
8
2
,
0
0
0
(
S
t
a
t
e
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$
7
5
,
0
0
0
$
5
0
7
,
0
0
0
&
T
B
D
$
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
(Lo
c
a
l
,
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
I
m
p
a
c
t
F
e
e
s
)
$100,000
Co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
$
2
2
4
,
0
0
0
(
T
B
D
,
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$
3
1
,
0
0
0
$
7
5
,
0
0
0
$
1
1
8
,
0
0
0
Pa
g
e
1
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
15
1
of
25
3
Ci
t
y
o
f
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
(
2
0
1
0
-
2
0
1
5
)
Tr
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
Tr
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
No
n
-
m
o
t
o
r
i
z
e
d
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
/
B
i
c
y
c
l
e
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
:
Gr
a
n
t
O
p
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
y
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
(2
0
1
0
-
2
0
1
5
)
Fu
n
d
i
n
g
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
N
a
m
e
Pu
r
p
o
s
e
Gr
a
n
t
/
D
a
t
e
Ph
a
s
e
T
o
t
a
l
C
o
s
t
So
u
r
c
e
20
1
0
2
0
1
1
2
0
1
2
2013
2
0
1
4
2015
In
t
e
r
u
r
b
a
n
T
r
a
i
l
Pa
v
e
,
s
i
g
n
,
a
n
d
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
r
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
s
e
g
m
e
n
t
f
r
o
m
RC
O
$7
5
0
,
0
0
0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$
7
5
0
,
0
0
0
24
4
t
h
t
o
2
2
8
t
h
&
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
$
4
7
1
,
0
0
0
(
S
t
a
t
e
,
se
c
u
r
e
d
)
$
4
7
1
,
0
0
0
Sh
o
r
e
l
i
n
e
t
o
M
o
u
n
t
l
a
k
e
T
e
r
r
a
c
e
CM
A
Q
g
r
a
n
t
s
$3
1
4
,
0
0
0
(
L
o
c
a
l
F
u
n
d
1
3
2
)
$
3
1
4
,
0
0
0
Ma
d
r
o
n
a
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
S
c
h
o
o
l
Im
p
r
o
v
e
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
s
a
f
e
t
y
w
i
t
h
i
n
s
t
a
l
l
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
n
e
w
P
o
s
s
i
b
l
e
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
a
n
d
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
$
0
(F
e
d
e
r
a
l
)
an
d
B
i
c
y
c
l
e
&
$
1
9
6
,
0
0
0
(
S
t
a
t
e
,
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$196,000
si
d
e
w
a
l
k
t
o
g
a
i
n
e
a
s
y
a
c
c
e
s
s
t
o
s
c
h
o
o
l
.
Sa
f
e
t
y
G
r
a
n
t
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
$
8
4
,
0
0
0
(L
o
c
a
l
)
$0
$84,000
80
t
h
A
v
.
W
f
r
o
m
1
8
8
t
h
S
t
.
S
W
t
o
Pr
o
v
i
d
e
s
a
f
e
a
n
d
d
e
s
i
r
a
b
l
e
r
o
u
t
e
t
o
Po
s
s
i
b
l
e
S
a
f
e
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
$
0
(F
e
d
e
r
a
l
)
Ol
y
m
p
i
c
V
i
e
w
D
r
.
Ro
u
t
e
s
t
o
&
$
1
2
0
,
0
0
0
(
S
t
a
t
e
,
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$120,000
Sc
h
o
o
l
G
r
a
n
t
&
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
$
0
(L
o
c
a
l
)
$0
Se
a
v
i
e
w
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
a
n
d
p
a
r
k
s
.
TB
D
$3
0
,
0
0
0
(
T
B
D
,
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$30,000
2n
d
A
v
.
S
f
r
o
m
J
a
m
e
s
S
t
.
t
o
M
a
i
n
S
t
.
En
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
$
0
(F
e
d
e
r
a
l
)
Pr
o
v
i
d
e
s
a
f
e
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
a
l
o
n
g
s
h
o
r
t
m
i
s
s
i
n
g
l
i
n
k
Lo
c
a
l
F
u
n
d
s
O
n
l
y
&
$0
(S
t
a
t
e
)
Co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
$
2
5
,
0
0
0
(L
o
c
a
l
)
$0
$25,000
Da
y
t
o
n
S
t
.
f
r
o
m
7
t
h
A
v
.
S
t
o
8
t
h
A
v
.
S
En
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
$
0
(F
e
d
e
r
a
l
)
Pr
o
v
i
d
e
s
a
f
e
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
a
l
o
n
g
s
h
o
r
t
m
i
s
s
i
n
g
l
i
n
k
Po
s
s
i
b
l
e
G
r
a
n
t
&
$3
2
,
0
0
0
(
S
t
a
t
e
,
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$32,000
Co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
$
4
1
,
0
0
0
(L
o
c
a
l
)
$10,000
$
3
1
,
0
0
0
22
6
t
h
S
t
.
S
W
W
a
l
k
w
a
y
Pr
o
v
i
d
e
s
a
f
e
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
m
i
s
s
i
n
g
l
i
n
k
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
S
R
-
1
0
4
a
n
d
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
$1
5
0
,
0
0
0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
,
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$
1
5
0
,
0
0
0
10
5
t
h
P
l
.
W
,
c
r
e
a
t
i
n
g
s
a
f
e
r
a
c
c
e
s
s
t
o
Co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
$
0
(S
t
a
t
e
)
Sh
e
r
w
o
o
d
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
a
n
d
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
n
e
i
g
h
b
h
o
o
d
s
.
Sa
f
e
t
y
G
r
a
n
t
$1
5
0
,
0
0
0
(L
o
c
a
l
)
$1
5
0
,
0
0
0
4t
h
A
v
e
n
u
e
C
o
r
r
i
d
o
r
E
n
h
a
n
c
e
m
e
n
t
Po
s
s
i
b
l
e
G
r
a
n
t
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
$
1
,
0
7
5
,
0
0
0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
,
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$7
5
,
0
0
0
$1,000,000
Cr
e
a
t
e
m
o
r
e
a
t
t
r
a
c
t
i
v
e
a
n
d
s
a
f
e
r
c
o
r
r
i
d
o
r
a
l
o
n
g
4
t
h
A
v
.
S
&
&
$0
(S
t
a
t
e
)
Lo
c
a
l
Co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
$
1
7
5
,
0
0
0
(L
o
c
a
l
)
$7
5
,
0
0
0
$100,000
To
t
a
l
$1
2
,
5
5
3
,
0
0
0
$1
,
7
4
7
,
0
0
0
$
7
7
,
0
1
1
$
5
1
2
,
0
1
2
$
1
,
3
1
3
,
0
1
3
$
7
8
2
,
0
1
4
$
8
,
2
0
7
,
0
1
5
To
t
a
l
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
(
S
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$9
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
0
$
0
$0 $0 $0
To
t
a
l
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
(
U
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$0
$
7
5
,
0
0
0
$
2
4
5
,
0
0
0
$
1
8
5
,
0
0
0
$
2
7
0
,
0
0
0
$
5
,
1
0
7
,
0
0
0
To
t
a
l
S
t
a
t
e
(
S
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$4
7
1
,
0
0
0
$
0
$
0
$0 $0 $0
To
t
a
l
S
t
a
t
e
(
U
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$0
$0
$
0
$0 $0 $0
To
t
a
l
(
T
B
D
,
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$3
1
,
0
0
0
$
0
$
0
$
1
7
3
,
0
0
0
$
1
5
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
,
2
4
3
,
0
0
0
To
t
a
l
(
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
e
r
,
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$0
$0
$
0
$
2
2
0
,
0
0
0
$
0
$0
To
t
a
l
L
o
c
a
l
F
u
n
d
$6
4
5
,
0
0
0
$0
$190,000 $197,000 $210,000 $496,000
Pa
g
e
2
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
15
2
of
25
3
Ci
t
y
o
f
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
(
2
0
1
0
-
2
0
1
5
)
St
o
r
m
w
a
t
e
r
St
o
r
m
w
a
t
e
r
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
Gr
a
n
t
O
p
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
y
(
2
0
1
0
-
2
0
1
5
)
F
u
n
d
i
n
g
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
N
a
m
e
Pu
r
p
o
s
e
Gr
a
n
t
/
D
a
t
e
T
o
t
a
l
C
o
s
t
S
o
u
r
c
e
2
0
1
0
2
0
1
1
2
0
1
2
2
0
1
3
2
0
1
4
2
0
1
5
So
u
t
h
w
e
s
t
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
B
a
s
i
n
S
t
u
d
y
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
2
Pr
o
v
i
d
e
o
v
e
r
f
l
o
w
t
o
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
i
n
f
i
l
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
y
s
t
e
m
s
-
$
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
Co
n
n
e
c
t
S
u
m
p
s
n
e
a
r
R
o
b
i
n
H
o
o
d
L
a
n
e
$3
6
4
,
1
9
7
(
D
e
b
t
,
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
9
9
,
1
1
8
$ 265,079 $
$1
2
1
,
3
9
9
(
L
o
c
a
l
,
S
t
o
r
m
w
a
t
e
r
F
e
e
s
)
3
3
,
0
3
9
$ 88,360 $
So
u
t
h
w
e
s
t
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
B
a
s
i
n
S
t
u
d
y
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
3
$0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
Co
n
n
e
c
t
S
u
m
p
s
o
n
2
3
8
t
h
S
t
S
W
$1
9
0
,
8
0
8
(
D
e
b
t
,
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
5
7
,
1
6
5
$ 133,643 $
$6
3
,
6
0
3
(
L
o
c
a
l
,
S
t
o
r
m
w
a
t
e
r
F
e
e
s
)
1
9
,
0
5
5
$ 44,548 $
Ed
m
o
n
d
s
M
a
r
s
h
1
0
0
-
y
e
a
r
f
l
o
o
d
p
l
a
i
n
d
e
l
i
n
e
a
t
i
o
n
s
t
u
d
y
$0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$5
1
,
5
0
0
(
O
t
h
e
r
a
g
e
n
c
i
e
s
,
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
51
,
5
0
0
$
$5
1
,
5
0
0
(
L
o
c
a
l
,
S
t
o
r
m
w
a
t
e
r
F
e
e
s
)
51
,
5
0
0
$
Ed
m
o
n
d
s
M
a
r
s
h
R
e
s
t
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
Po
s
s
i
b
l
e
G
r
a
n
t
/
T
B
D
$
2
,
3
2
8
,
6
4
8
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$
2
8
,
0
0
8
$
1
4
0
,
7
4
3
$
7
1
3
,
1
2
2
$
1
,
4
4
6
,
7
7
4
$1
4
5
,
5
4
1
(
O
t
h
e
r
a
g
e
n
c
i
e
s
,
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$
1
,
7
5
1
$
8
,
7
9
6
$
4
4
,
5
7
0
$
9
0
,
4
2
3
$4
3
6
,
6
2
2
(
L
o
c
a
l
,
S
t
o
r
m
w
a
t
e
r
F
e
e
s
,
P
a
r
k
s
)
$
5
,
2
5
2
$
2
6
,
3
8
9
$
1
3
3
,
7
1
0
$
2
7
1
,
2
7
0
Da
y
l
i
g
h
t
W
i
l
l
o
w
C
r
e
e
k
i
n
M
a
r
i
n
a
B
e
a
c
h
P
a
r
k
Po
s
s
i
b
l
e
G
r
a
n
t
/
T
B
D
$
3
,
7
0
5
,
7
8
2
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$ 57,401 $ 349,811 $ 3,298,570
$0
(
D
e
b
t
,
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$6
5
3
,
9
6
1
(
L
o
c
a
l
,
S
t
o
r
m
w
a
t
e
r
F
e
e
s
,
P
a
r
k
s
)
$ 10,130 $ 61,731 $ 582,101
Pe
r
r
i
n
v
i
l
l
e
C
r
e
e
k
H
i
g
h
F
l
o
w
D
i
v
e
r
s
i
o
n
a
n
d
H
a
b
i
t
a
t
R
e
s
t
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
Po
s
s
i
b
l
e
G
r
a
n
t
/
T
B
D
$
3
,
6
7
4
,
9
4
4
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$
4
4
1
,
6
0
0
$
1
,
5
9
3
,
1
9
6
$
1
,
6
4
0
,
1
4
8
$7
3
4
,
9
8
9
(
D
e
b
t
,
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$
8
8
,
3
2
0
$
3
1
8
,
6
3
9
$
3
2
8
,
0
3
0
$4
8
9
,
9
9
3
(
L
o
c
a
l
,
S
t
o
r
m
w
a
t
e
r
F
e
e
s
)
$
5
8
,
8
8
0
$
2
1
2
,
4
2
6
$
2
1
8
,
6
8
6
95
t
h
/
9
3
r
d
S
t
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
$0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$5
2
1
,
8
8
5
(
D
e
b
t
,
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$ 21,947 $ 499,937
$1
7
3
,
9
6
2
(
L
o
c
a
l
,
S
t
o
r
m
w
a
t
e
r
F
e
e
s
)
$ 7,316 $ 166,646
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
W
a
s
h
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
Po
s
s
i
b
l
e
G
r
a
n
t
/
T
B
D
$
1
0
1
,
8
4
6
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$
1
0
1
,
8
4
6
$0
(
D
e
b
t
,
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$2
5
,
4
6
2
(
L
o
c
a
l
,
S
t
o
r
m
w
a
t
e
r
F
e
e
s
)
2
5
,
4
6
2
$
TO
T
A
L
S
$0
To
t
a
l
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
&
S
t
a
t
e
(
S
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$9
,
8
1
1
,
2
2
0
To
t
a
l
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
&
S
t
a
t
e
(U
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
-
$
5
7
1
,
4
5
4
$
1,733,939$ 2,410,672 $ 1,796,585 $ 3,298,570 $
$1
9
7
,
0
4
1
To
t
a
l
O
t
h
e
r
a
g
e
n
c
i
e
s
(
U
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
Po
r
t
&
W
S
D
O
T
)
51
,
5
0
0
$
1,751
$
8,796$ 44,570 $ 90,423 $ -$
$0
To
t
a
l
D
e
b
t
(
S
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$0
$
0
$
0
$0 $0 $0
$1
,
8
1
1
,
8
7
8
To
t
a
l
D
e
b
t
(
U
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
-
$
8
8
,
3
2
0
$
318,639 $ 349,977 $ 656,220 $ 398,722 $
$1
,
4
7
1
,
2
0
9
To
t
a
l
L
o
c
a
l
S
t
o
r
m
w
a
t
e
r
F
e
e
(S
e
c
u
r
e
d
a
n
d
U
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
51
,
5
0
0
$
86,967
$
225,621 $ 297,922 $ 385,241 $ 423,958 $
$5
4
5
,
2
9
1
To
t
a
l
L
o
c
a
l
P
a
r
k
s
(
U
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$0
$
2
,
6
2
6
$
1
3
,
1
9
5
$
7
1
,
9
2
0
$
1
6
6
,
5
0
1
$
2
9
1
,
0
5
0
Pr
o
v
i
d
e
W
a
s
h
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
a
t
t
h
e
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
y
a
r
d
Pr
o
v
i
d
e
o
v
e
r
f
l
o
w
t
o
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
i
n
f
i
l
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
y
s
t
e
m
s
Co
n
d
u
c
t
r
e
v
e
g
e
t
a
t
i
o
n
,
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
t
h
e
f
l
a
p
g
a
t
e
t
o
a
l
l
o
w
b
e
t
t
e
r
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
P
u
g
e
t
S
o
u
n
d
,
a
n
d
re
m
o
v
e
s
e
d
i
m
e
n
t
.
Co
n
d
u
c
t
a
n
u
p
d
a
t
e
d
1
0
0
y
r
f
l
o
o
d
p
l
a
i
n
d
e
l
i
n
e
a
t
i
o
n
s
t
u
d
y
t
o
a
s
s
i
s
t
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
o
w
n
e
r
s
w
i
t
h
p
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
st
r
a
t
e
g
i
e
s
f
o
r
n
e
w
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
o
r
r
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
o
f
t
h
e
a
r
e
a
.
Da
y
l
i
g
h
t
W
i
l
l
o
w
C
r
e
e
k
(
o
r
i
g
i
n
a
l
l
y
a
s
p
a
r
t
o
f
t
h
e
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
C
r
o
s
s
i
n
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
)
.
A
r
a
i
l
r
o
a
d
t
r
e
s
t
l
e
i
s
cu
r
r
e
n
t
l
y
p
l
a
n
n
e
d
t
o
b
e
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
e
d
b
y
S
o
u
n
d
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
/
B
N
S
F
.
Co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
a
p
p
r
o
x
i
m
a
t
e
l
y
4
,
0
0
0
l
i
n
e
a
r
f
e
e
t
o
f
n
e
w
s
t
o
r
m
d
r
a
i
n
p
i
p
e
a
n
d
n
e
w
c
a
t
c
h
b
a
s
i
n
s
a
n
d
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
to
t
h
e
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
s
t
o
r
m
d
r
a
i
n
s
y
s
t
e
m
.
Co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
a
h
i
g
h
f
l
o
w
d
i
v
e
r
s
i
o
n
p
i
p
e
t
h
a
t
w
o
u
l
d
d
i
v
e
r
t
h
i
g
h
p
e
a
k
s
t
r
e
a
m
f
l
o
w
s
c
a
u
s
e
d
b
y
e
x
c
e
s
s
i
v
e
st
o
r
m
w
a
t
e
r
r
u
n
o
f
f
.
11
/
2
0
/
2
0
0
9
Pa
g
e
3
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
15
3
of
25
3
Ci
t
y
o
f
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
(
2
0
1
0
-
2
0
1
5
)
Pa
r
k
s
,
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
a
n
d
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
Gr
a
n
t
O
p
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
y
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
(
2
0
1
0
-
2
0
1
5
)
F
u
n
d
i
n
g
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
N
a
m
e
Pu
r
p
o
s
e
Gr
a
n
t
/
D
a
t
e
P
h
a
s
e
T
o
t
a
l
C
o
s
t
S
o
u
r
c
e
2
0
1
0
2
0
1
1
2
0
1
2
2
0
1
3
2
0
1
4
2
0
1
5
Aq
u
a
t
i
c
C
e
n
t
e
r
Me
e
t
c
i
t
i
z
e
n
n
e
e
d
s
f
o
r
a
n
A
q
u
a
t
i
c
s
C
e
n
t
e
r
U
n
k
n
o
w
n
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
u
a
l
$
5
m
-
$
2
3
m
P
u
b
l
i
c
V
o
t
e
(f
e
a
s
i
b
i
l
i
t
y
s
t
u
d
y
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
A
u
g
u
s
t
2
0
0
9
)
G.
O
.
B
o
n
d
s
Ar
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
/
A
r
t
M
u
s
e
u
m
E
s
t
a
b
l
i
s
h
a
n
e
w
c
e
n
t
e
r
f
o
r
t
h
e
U
n
k
n
o
w
n
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
u
a
l
u
n
k
n
o
w
n
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
Ar
t
'
s
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
P
a
r
t
n
e
r
s
h
i
p
s
Bo
y
s
&
G
i
r
l
s
C
l
u
b
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
P
u
r
c
h
a
s
e
f
r
o
m
E
S
D
,
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
/
u
p
g
r
a
d
e
U
n
k
n
o
w
n
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
u
a
l
B
e
y
o
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
C
a
m
p
a
i
g
n
Ac
q
u
i
s
i
t
i
o
n
(l
e
a
s
e
d
w
i
t
h
C
i
v
i
c
P
l
a
y
f
i
e
l
d
u
n
t
i
l
2
0
2
1
)
20
1
5
G
.
O
.
B
o
n
d
s
Ci
v
i
l
P
l
a
y
f
i
e
l
d
A
c
q
u
i
s
i
t
i
o
n
P
u
r
c
h
a
s
e
f
r
o
m
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
U
n
k
n
o
w
n
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
u
a
l
B
e
y
o
n
d
P
u
b
l
i
c
V
o
t
e
(C
i
t
y
h
a
s
l
e
a
s
e
u
n
t
i
l
2
0
2
1
)
20
1
5
R
E
E
T
1
/
G
r
a
n
t
s
Do
w
n
t
o
w
n
S
t
r
e
e
t
L
i
g
h
t
i
n
g
E
x
p
a
n
d
t
h
e
D
e
c
o
r
a
t
i
v
e
S
t
r
e
e
t
L
i
g
h
t
i
n
g
o
n
U
n
k
n
o
w
n
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
$
2
5
,
0
0
0
P
u
b
l
i
c
V
o
t
e
$
2
5
,
0
0
0
Ma
i
n
S
t
r
e
e
t
G
.
O
.
B
o
n
d
s
Fi
r
e
A
d
m
i
n
i
s
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
i
n
i
n
g
P
r
o
v
i
d
e
a
t
r
a
i
n
i
n
g
c
l
a
s
s
r
o
o
m
,
A
d
m
i
n
O
f
f
i
c
e
s
U
n
k
n
o
w
n
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
u
a
l
u
n
k
n
o
w
n
Pu
b
l
i
c
V
o
t
e
,
E
M
S
Fa
c
i
l
i
t
y
*
an
d
a
n
o
n
-
b
u
r
n
i
n
g
p
r
a
c
t
i
c
e
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
Tr
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
F
e
e
s
,
G
.
O
.
B
o
n
d
s
Co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
P
a
r
k
/
A
t
h
l
e
t
i
c
I
n
c
o
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
w
i
t
h
E
S
D
#
1
5
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
U
n
k
n
o
w
n
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
$10
m
-
$
1
2
m
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
c
a
m
p
a
i
g
n
$300,000
Co
m
p
l
e
x
O
l
d
W
o
o
d
w
a
y
H
S
a
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
p
a
r
k
a
n
d
a
t
h
l
e
t
i
c
c
o
m
p
l
e
x
Gr
a
n
t
s
/
R
E
E
T
2
Pa
r
k
s
&
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
M
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
&
e
x
p
a
n
d
d
e
t
e
r
i
o
r
a
t
i
n
g
Un
k
n
o
w
n
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
$
3
-
$
4
m
P
u
b
l
i
c
V
o
t
e
&
O
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
i
n
C
i
t
y
P
a
r
k
G.
O
.
B
o
n
d
s
Se
n
i
o
r
C
e
n
t
e
r
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
a
n
d
e
x
p
a
n
d
d
e
t
e
r
i
o
r
a
t
i
n
g
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
o
n
U
n
k
n
o
w
n
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
u
a
l
u
n
k
n
o
w
n
P
u
b
l
i
c
V
o
t
e
/
G
r
a
n
t
s
th
e
w
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
G.
O
.
B
o
n
d
s
Pr
i
v
a
t
e
P
a
r
t
n
e
r
s
h
i
p
WS
D
O
T
F
e
r
r
y
/
Re
l
o
c
a
t
e
f
e
r
r
y
t
e
r
m
i
n
a
l
US
D
O
T
E
I
S
B
e
y
o
n
d
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
/
Mu
l
t
i
m
o
d
e
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
to
M
a
r
i
n
a
B
e
a
c
h
Co
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
2
0
1
5
S
t
a
t
e
F
u
n
d
s
*
No
t
n
e
e
d
e
d
i
f
c
i
t
y
c
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
s
w
i
t
h
F
i
r
e
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
1
f
o
r
f
i
r
e
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
.
Pa
g
e
4
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
15
4
of
25
3
Capital Improvements Program
Transportation Projects- Fund 112
Projects for 2009-2015
2009
PROJECT NAME YE Estimate 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
212th & 84th Ave Intersection Improvements (Five Corners)$370,000 $1,540,000
Nonmotorized Trans- Main Street Pedestrian Lighting $553 $533,000
Nonmotorized Trans- Citywide Pedestrian Lighting $5,000 $5,000 $5,000
Nonmotorized- Walkway & Bikeway Projects- Citywide $12,500 $12,500 $12,500
Nonmotorized Trans- SR524 Walkway $588,370
Nonmotorized Trans.- Olympic View Dr. Ped Improvements $176,955
Nonmotorized Trans- 80th Ave W / 188th St SW / Olympic View Dr. Walkway $150,000
Nonmotorized Trans-Madrona Elem School Walkway (236th St./ 94th Ave)$280,000
Nonmotorized Trans- 2nd Av. S from James St. to Main St.$25,000
Nonmotorized Trans- Dayton St. from 7th Av. S to 8th Av. S $10,000 $63,000
Nonmotorized Trans- Shell Valley-Bike-Walk $23,049
Nonmotorized Trans-Downtown Parking $3,000 $3,000 $3,000
Nonmotorized Trans-226th St. SW Walkway $35,000 $150,000
Nonmotorized Trans-ADA Curb Ramps (Transition Plan)$150,000 $150,000 $150,000
Nonmotorized Trans-Bicycle Route Signing $5,000 $1,500 $1,500 $1,500
Overlay-Citywide $750,000 $750,000 $750,000
Overlay-Utilities $255,000 $355,000 $365,000 $265,000 $365,000 $315,000
Overlay-2009 ARRA Project $1,012,038
Signal Improvements - Citywide $5,000 $5,000 $5,000
Intersection Improvements- 88th Ave & 196th St $155,000 $724,000
Sight Distance Improvements- 80th Ave W $292,000
Signal Upgrades- 238th St & 100th Ave $236,000
Signal Upgrade Main & 3rd $138,000
Intersection Improvements 9th & Main $150,000 $725,000
Intersection Improvement- 9th & Caspers
Intersection Improvements- 76th Av @212th $270,000
Intersection Improvements - Walnut St @ 9th Ave $150,000 $725,000
228th St. SW Corridor Safety Improvements $67,449 $31,000 $355,000 $270,000 $3,452,000
Street Improvements- Citywide $7,500 $7,500 $7,500
Traffic Calming- Citywide $5,000 $5,000 $5,000
Transportation Plan $141,567 $30,000
Pedestrian Countdown Signals - Citywide $14,500 $14,500 $14,500
Arterial Street Signal Coordination Improvements $50,000
Total Construction Projects $2,044,981 $436,000 $399,500 $894,500 $3,487,000 $1,984,500 $8,459,500
Revenues and Cash Balances 2009-2015
Beginning Cash Balance $435,621 $140,214 $218,833 $315,650 $359,474 $15,294 $380,974
Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax $165,000 $165,000 $165,000 $165,000 $165,000 $165,000 $165,000
Transfer in Fund 125-(REET 2 Trans.) for OVD Pedestrian Improvements $71,381
Transfer in Fund 125-(REET 2 Trans.)$250,000 $250,000 $250,000
Transfer in General Fund for 88th Ave & 196th St Intersection Improvements $10,000
Transfer in General Fund for 80th Ave. Sight Distance Improvements $220,000
Transfer in General Fund for Main Street Pedestrian Lighting $75,000
Investment Interest Fund 112 $9,492 $2,384 $3,720 $5,366 $0
Traffic Impact Fees $80,000 $80,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000
Transfer in- Fund 412-100 $0 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000
Transfer in- Fund 412-200 $0 $55,000 $55,000 $65,000 $65,000 $65,000 $65,000
Transfer in- Fund 412-300 $0 $50,000 $150,000 $150,000 $50,000 $150,000 $100,000
Revenues and Cash Balance Total =$761,494 $642,598 $852,553 $951,016 $1,214,474 $1,115,294 $1,210,974
Secured Grants/ Loans
Grant (State) SR524 Walkway $435,000
Grant (State-TIB) SR524 Walkway $153,321
Grant (Federal) 226th Walkway Project $35,000 $150,000
2009 ARRA Overlay Project $1,000,000
Emergency Funding (State) for Olympic View Drive Road Stabilization $6,304
Emergency Funding (State) for 76th Ave. W Road Stabilization $4,200
Secured Grant /Loans =$1,633,825 $150,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Unsecured Funding
TBD for Annual Street Overlays $750,000 $750,000 $750,000
TBD for Signal Upgrade 238th & 100th $71,000
TBD for Main Pedestrian Lighting $160,000
TBD for 212th @ 84th Capacity Improvements $440,000
TBD for 228th St. SW Corridor Safety Improvements $85,000 $345,000
TBD for Main & 9th Intersection Improvements $75,000 $118,000
TBD for Walnut & 9th Intersection Improvements $75,000 $310,000
TBD for 88th @ 196th Intersection Improvements $88,000
TBD for Bicycle Route Signing $1,500 $1,500 $1,500
TBD for ADA Curb Ramp Improvements (Transition Plan) $150,000 $75,000 $75,000
TBD for 80th Av / 188th St SW / Olympic View Dr. Walkway $30,000 $120,000
Grant-(Federal) for Main St. Pedestrian Lighting $373,000
Grant-(State) for 88th @ 196th Intersection Improvements $75,000 $536,000
Grant-(State) for Signal Upgrade 238th & 100th $165,000
Grant-(State) for Signal Upgrade Main/3rd Ave
Grant-(Fed) for 228th St. SW Corridor Safety Improvements $245,000 $185,000 $3,106,000
Grant (State) for 9th & Main St. Intersection Improvements $75,000 $507,000
Grant(State) for 80th Av / 188th St SW / Olympic View Dr Walkway $120,000
Grant (State) for Madrona.Elem Walkway Improvements $196,000
Grant (State) for 212th & 84th Capacity Improvements $270,000 $1,000,000
Grant (State) for Walnut & 9th Intersection Improvements $75,000 $315,000
Grant (State) for 238th St. SW / 84th Av W $120,000
Grant(State) for 76th Av @ 212th Intersection Improvements $189,000
Grant-(State) Non-Motorized Trans for Dayton St.(7th Av. S to 8th Av. S)$32,000
New Revenue Source
Unsecured Funding =$0 $0 $0 $440,000 $2,564,500 $1,426,500 $7,624,500
Grant Subtotal (Secured & Unsecured)$1,633,825 $150,000 $0 $440,000 $2,564,500 $1,426,500 $7,624,500
Interfund Transfers Out -$132,000 -$60,000 -$60,000 -$60,000 -$200,000 -$100,000 -$250,000
Debt Service on Loan (1) 220th St Design -$19,413 -$19,323 -$19,232 -$19,141 -$19,050 -$18,960 -$18,869
Debt Service on Loan (2) 220th St Construction -$22,871 -$22,765 -$22,659 -$22,553 -$22,447 -$22,341 -$22,235
Debt Service on Loan (3) 100th Ave Road Stabilization -$35,841 -$35,677 -$35,512 -$35,348 -$35,183 -$35,019 -$34,854
Total Revenues & Cash Balances $2,185,194 $654,833 $715,150 $1,253,974 $3,502,294 $2,365,474 $8,509,516
Total Construction Projects $2,044,981 $436,000 $399,500 $894,500 $3,487,000 $1,984,500 $8,459,500
Ending Cash Balance $140,214 $218,833 $315,650 $359,474 $15,294 $380,974 $50,016
Packet Page 155 of 253
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
15
6
of
25
3
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
15
7
of
25
3
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
15
8
of
25
3
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
15
9
of
25
3
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
16
0
of
25
3
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
16
1
of
25
3
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
16
2
of
25
3
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
16
3
of
25
3
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
16
4
of
25
3
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
16
5
of
25
3
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
16
6
of
25
3
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
16
7
of
25
3
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
16
8
of
25
3
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
16
9
of
25
3
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
17
0
of
25
3
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
17
1
of
25
3
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
17
2
of
25
3
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
17
3
of
25
3
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
17
4
of
25
3
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
17
5
of
25
3
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
17
6
of
25
3
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
17
7
of
25
3
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
17
8
of
25
3
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
17
9
of
25
3
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
18
0
of
25
3
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
18
1
of
25
3
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
18
2
of
25
3
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
18
3
of
25
3
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
18
4
of
25
3
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
18
5
of
25
3
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
18
6
of
25
3
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
18
7
of
25
3
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
18
8
of
25
3
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
18
9
of
25
3
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
19
0
of
25
3
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
19
1
of
25
3
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
19
2
of
25
3
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
19
3
of
25
3
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
19
4
of
25
3
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
19
5
of
25
3
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
19
6
of
25
3
Packet Page 197 of 253
Packet Page 198 of 253
Packet Page 199 of 253
Packet Page 200 of 253
Transportation Committee
Transportation Committee
Comments regarding
Comments regarding
Transportation CIP/CFP
Transportation CIP/CFP
City Council Public Hearing
City Council Public Hearing
December 1
December 1
stst , 2009
, 2009
Packet Page 201 of 253
Transportation System Overview
Transportation System Overview
Transportation is one of the City’s Primary Services
Transportation is one of the City’s Primary Services
However 2010
However 2010 --2015 CIP / CFP falls well short of Transportation Plan
2015 CIP / CFP falls well short of Transportation Plan
RecommendationsRecommendations
Huge Funding Gap
Huge Funding Gap
Poor Walkway Funding
Meadowdale Beach Road?
180th /80th in 2015-16 if…
Madrona Elem 2015-16 if…
No Stabilization Projects (4 Major Projects in last 8 years)
Insignificant # of City Streets being overlaid annually
Insignificant # of City Streets being overlaid annually
Packet Page 202 of 253
TIP / CIP
Packet Page 203 of 253
WALKWAY PROJECTS
WALKWAY PROJECTS
absence of sidewalk near
absence of sidewalk near MadronaMadrona ElementaryElementary
School, on 96
School, on 96
thth Avenue W., looking NB
Avenue W., looking NB
Packet Page 204 of 253
Absence of sidewalk along
Absence of sidewalk along
180180thth St. SW, looking WB
St. SW, looking WB
Runs along Sierra, Seaview & Southwest County Park
Links to Seaview Elementary School
Packet Page 205 of 253
Absence of sidewalk along collector street,
Absence of sidewalk along collector street,
MeadowdaleMeadowdale Beach Rd., looking WB
Beach Rd., looking WB
Links to Olympic View Dr, 76
th Ave. W, Mead. Elem & Mead. Middle
Schools
Packet Page 206 of 253
POOR PAVEMENT CONDITIONS
POOR PAVEMENT CONDITIONS
MeadowdaleMeadowdale Beach Rd. (collector street)
Beach Rd. (collector street)
Rebuild of Road can drive Cost to 3 times that of Simple of Overlay
Packet Page 207 of 253
80th Av. W
Packet Page 208 of 253
88th Av. W
88th Av. W
Packet Page 209 of 253
Olympic View Drive
Olympic View Drive
Packet Page 210 of 253
ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
TwoTwo--Way Left
Way Left Turn lanes, Sidewalk / Bike lane addition 84
Turn lanes, Sidewalk / Bike lane addition 84
thth Av.Av.
W, prior to 220
W, prior to 220
thth St. SW, looking NB
St. SW, looking NB
Packet Page 211 of 253
Five Corners
Five Corners
Roundabout to improve intersection delay
Roundabout to improve intersection delay
Packet Page 212 of 253
228th Street SW Corridor Improvements
228th Street SW Corridor Improvements
Dangerous Southbound Left turn from Hwy. 99 to 76
Dangerous Southbound Left turn from Hwy. 99 to 76
thth Av. W,
Av. W,
Signalized intersection at Hwy. 99 @ 228
Signalized intersection at Hwy. 99 @ 228
thth St.St.
Packet Page 213 of 253
Overlay Comments
Overlay Comments
Current Overlay Cycle is approximately 80 years (under
Current Overlay Cycle is approximately 80 years (undercurrent funding scenario)
current funding scenario)
2020--year Standard for Arterials
year Standard for Arterials
3030--year for Residuals
year for Residuals
With additional funding sources such as:
With additional funding sources such as:
$20 additional TBD, would be reduced to 50 year cycle
$20 additional TBD, would be reduced to 50 year cycle
$40 additional TBD, would be reduced to 40 year cycle
$40 additional TBD, would be reduced to 40 year cycle
$60 additional TBD, would be reduced to 25 year cycle
$60 additional TBD, would be reduced to 25 year cycle
w/ additional $80 TBD, would be reduced to 22 year cycle
w/ additional $80 TBD, would be reduced to 22 year cycle
Note: all additional TBD needs voter approval; $20 has already
Note: all additional TBD needs voter approval; $20 has already
been approved by City Council to fund only Operations &
been approved by City Council to fund only Operations &
Maintenance projects
Maintenance projects
Packet Page 214 of 253
Revenue from identified sources from 2010 through 2025 =
Revenue from identified sources from 2010 through 2025 =
$40,710,931$40,710,931
SourcesSources
GrantsGrants
Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax
Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax
Traffic Impact Fees*
Traffic Impact Fees*
Transfers from Other Funds
Transfers from Other Funds
Utility Resurfacing
Utility Resurfacing
Joint Agency
Joint Agency
Interest Income
Interest Income
Real Estate Excise Tax
Real Estate Excise Tax
* Updated Impact Fee =$1,071 per trip
* Updated Impact Fee =$1,071 per trip
Packet Page 215 of 253
DIFFERENT FUNDING SCENARIOS
DIFFERENT FUNDING SCENARIOS
(based on projected revenue 2010 through 2025)
(based on projected revenue 2010 through 2025)
CurrentCurrent
++
$20 TBD
$20 TBD
++
$40 TBD
$40 TBD
++
$60 TBD
$60 TBD
++
$80 TBD
$80 TBD
ProjectedProjected
RevenueRevenue
$40.7M$40.7M $52.6M$52.6M $64.2M$64.2M $75.9M$75.9M $87.5M$87.5M
Avg.Avg.
Revenue/YearRevenue/Year
$2.6M$2.6M $3.3M$3.3M $4.0M$4.0M $4.7M$4.7M $5.5M$5.5M
% of Plan
% of Plan
FundedFunded
23%23%40%40%57%57%71%71%83%83%
Road Projects
Road Projects 22%22%33%33%57%57%66%66%77%77%
NonNon--MotorizedMotorized 21%21%52%52%59%59%67%67%78%78%
Street Overlays
Street Overlays 8080--yryr 5050--yryr 4040--yryr 2525--yryr 2222--yryr
ADA Transition
ADA Transition 7575--yryr 3838--yryr 3030--yryr 2020--yryr 1919--yryr
Traffic Calming
Traffic Calming 0%0%50%50%100%100%100%100%100%100%
Left on Table
Left on Table $16.6M$16.6M $10.9M$10.9M $3.6M$3.6M $1.6M$1.6M $0$0
Packet Page 216 of 253
The Problems Created
The Problems Created
by a Poorly Funded Program
by a Poorly Funded Program
Deferred Maintenance and Delayed Improvements
Deferred Maintenance and Delayed Improvementsresult in;
result in;
Emergency or Future Projects at a much Higher
Emergency or Future Projects at a much HigherCostCost
AccidentsAccidents
Litigation, Liability
Litigation, Liability
Less Attractive City
Less Attractive City
Other Problems with Poor Funding
Other Problems with Poor Funding
Inability to Accomplish Projects on Short Notice
Inability to Accomplish Projects on Short Notice
Inability to Obtain Grants due to lack of Local Match
Inability to Obtain Grants due to lack of Local Match
Inability to Construct projects when Construction Costs
Inability to Construct projects when Construction Costsare Low!
are Low!
Packet Page 217 of 253
Potential Funding Sources
Potential Funding Sources
Additional TBD funding
Additional TBD funding
Olympic View Franchise Fees. It should go to
Olympic View Franchise Fees. It should go to
Transportation!Transportation!
Redistribution of REET
Redistribution of REET
Funding Sources that people are currently afraid to
Funding Sources that people are currently afraid to
even mention due to their Political Implications,
even mention due to their Political Implications,
but this needs to change:
but this needs to change:
Should Explore Pros and Cons of All Possibilities
Should Explore Pros and Cons of All Possibilities
Packet Page 218 of 253
Transportation Committee Recommendation
Transportation Committee Recommendation
City needs to Prioritize the development of a
City needs to Prioritize the development of a solidsolid
funding plan for
funding plan for our Transportation system
our Transportation system
Work should begin immediately
Work should begin immediately
Include the possibility of additional Transportation Benefit
Include the possibility of additional Transportation Benefit
District funding
District funding
Urge that this process be transparent
Urge that this process be transparent
Encourage the city to examine all possible, available
Encourage the city to examine all possible, available
revenue sources
revenue sources to fund transportation capital
to fund transportation capital
improvementsimprovements
The Committee will work with the City staff to develop such
The Committee will work with the City staff to develop such
a plan
a plan
Packet Page 219 of 253
AM-2593 8.
Public Hearing on Proposed 215th St. Rezone
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:12/01/2009
Submitted By:Gina Coccia Time:20 Minutes
Department:Planning Type:Action
Review Committee:
Committee Action:Recommend Review by Full Council
Information
Subject Title
Public hearing on a proposed Rezone (File #PLN20090019) to change the zoning designation
from Multiple Residential (RM-2.4) to Single-Family Residential (RS-8) along a portion of
215th Street SW. All properties were subject to a Comprehensive Plan amendment that was
approved last year (File #AMD20070014).
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Direct the City Attoney to prepare an ordinance which implements one of the following
recommendations:
1) Approve the change in zoning, as recommended by staff (see Exhibit 1), or,
2) Deny the change in zoning and remand the issue to the Planning Board for further review during
the 2010 comprehensive plan update cycle, as recommended by the Planning Board (see Exhibit
2).
Previous Council Action
The City Council approved a Comprehensive Plan amendment for the subject properties from
multi family to single family in 2008.
Narrative
See staff report and 10/14/2009 Planning Board minutes, attached.
Last year the Planning Board recommended denial of the Comprehensive Plan amendment (File
#AMD20070014) that would change the Comprehensive Plan designation from "Mixed Use
Commercial" to "Single Family - Urban 1." The Council subsequently approved the
Comprehensive Plan amendment, and at the request of Mr. Underhill, directed staff to initiate this
rezone application for consistency. For the rezone request at hand, staff recommended approval to
the Planning Board and the Planning Board recommended denial to the City Council.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: Exhibit 1 - Staff Report & Attachments
Link: Exhibit 2 - Planning Board Minutes
Packet Page 220 of 253
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 11/19/2009 04:17 PM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 11/19/2009 05:22 PM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 11/20/2009 08:38 AM APRV
Form Started By: Gina
Coccia
Started On: 11/05/2009 04:58
PM
Final Approval Date: 11/20/2009
Packet Page 221 of 253
City of Edmonds Planning Board
CITY OF EDMONDS
121 - 5TH AVENUE NORTH, EDMONDS, WA 98020
PLANNING DIVISION ADVISORY REPORT
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS
To: EDMONDS PLANNING BOARD
From:
Gina Coccia
Associate Planner
Date: Planning Board Meeting of October 14, 2009
File: R-2009-19
Rezone application initiated by the City Council for the properties along 215th Street SW
lying east of 76th Avenue West and addressed between 7321 and 7528 215th Street SW,
inclusive. Proposed zoning change from “Multiple Residential” (RM-2.4) to “Single-Family
Residential” (RS-8). These properties were subject to a Comprehensive Plan amendment that
was approved in 2008 (AMD-2007-14) and the proposed rezone would make the zoning
consistent with the Comprehensive Plan map.
Hearing Date, Time, and Place: October 14, 2009 at 7:00 PM
Edmonds City Council Chambers
Public Safety Complex
250 - 5th Avenue North
I. INTRODUCTION
A. APPLICATION
1. Applicant: City of Edmonds – the City Council initiated the proposal.
2. Site Location: Properties along 215th Street SW lying east of 76th Avenue West and
addressed between 7321 and 7528 – 215th Street SW, inclusive (refer to Attachment 1).
3. Request: Application for a rezone from “Multiple Residential” (RM-2.4) to “Single-
Family Residential” (RS-8) (Attachment 1).
4. Review Process: Rezone - Planning Board conducts a public hearing and forwards a
recommendation to the City Council for final decision.
5. Major Issues:
a. Compliance with Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) Chapter
20.40 (REZONES).
b. Compliance with Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) Chapter
20.100 (HEARING EXAMINER, PLANNING ADVISORY BOARD AND
CITY COUNCIL REVIEW).
Packet Page 222 of 253
R-2009-19_PB-StaffReport.doc Page 2 of 6
B. RECOMMENDATION
Based on Statements of Fact, Analysis, Conclusions, and Attachments in this report, staff
recommends that the Planning Board make a recommendation to the City Council to
APPROVE the requested rezone from “Multiple Residential” (RM-2.4) to “Single-Family
Residential” (RS-8).
II. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS
A. SITE DESCRIPTION
1. Site Development and Zoning
a. Facts:
(1) Size and Shape: The area under review is comprised of 19 lots along
215th Street SW lying east of 76th Avenue West and addressed between
7321 and 7528 – 215th Street SW, inclusive. Each parcel is roughly 0.25
acres and the area as a whole is approximately 4.5 acres (Attachment 2)
(2) Land Use:
Each lot is developed with one single family home constructed in the
1950s-1960s.
(3) Zoning:
Current zoning of the subject properties is “Multiple Residential” (RM-2.4)
as shown on the vicinity map (Attachment 1). This area has been zoned for
multiple-residential use as far back as 1963 – for almost fifty years.
2. Neighboring Development and Zoning
a. Facts:
(1) North: Multi-family developments, some under RM-2.4 zoning and a
portion zoned “General Commercial” (CG2).
(2) East: Multi-family developments, some under RM-2.4 zoning and slightly
further east begins an area of RM-1.5 zoning.
(3) South: Stevens Hospital, which is zoned “Medical Use” (MU).
(4) West: Edmonds Woodway High School is across 76th Avenue West to the
west and is zoned “Public” (P) – refer to Attachment 1.
Courtesy of Bing.com Courtesy of Bing.com
Packet Page 223 of 253
R-2009-19_PB-StaffReport.doc Page 3 of 6
B. STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT (SEPA)
1. Fact: A Determination of Nonsignificance was issued on September 10, 2009, for the
change in zoning. No appeals were received.
2. Conclusion: SEPA requirements have been satisfied for the proposed change in
zoning.
C. EDMONDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE (ECDC) COMPLIANCE
1. ECDC Section 20.40 (Rezones)
a. Facts:
(i) The RS-8 zoning classification is included in Attachment 5 for reference.
(ii) Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) Section 20.40.010 provides
that, at a minimum, the following factors shall be considered in reviewing an
application for a rezone:
(1) Comprehensive Plan. Whether the proposal is consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan; and,
(2) Zoning Ordinance. Whether the proposal is consistent with the
purposes of the Zoning Ordinance, and whether the proposal is consistent
with the purposes of the proposed zone district; and,
(3) Surrounding Area. The relationship of the proposed zoning change to
the existing land uses and zoning of surrounding or nearby property; and,
(4) Changes. Whether there has been sufficient change in the character of
the immediate or surrounding area or in city policy to justify the rezone:
and,
(5) Suitability. Whether the property is economically and physically
suitable for the uses allowed under the existing zoning, and under the
proposed zoning. One factor could be the length of time the property has
remained undeveloped compared to the surrounding area, and parcels
elsewhere with the same zoning; and
(6) Value. The relative gain to the public health, safety and welfare
compared to the potential increase or decrease in value to the property
owners.
b. Analysis:
(i) Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan designates the subject
property as part of the “Medical/Highway 99 Activity Center.” The
Comprehensive Plan map designation was amended in 2008 by the City
Council from “Mixed Use Commercial” to “Single-Family Urban 1”
(Attachment 3). The proposed new zone (RS-8) is consistent with the new
Comprehensive Plan designation. The intent of the initiation of this rezone
request is to make the zoning consistent with the Comprehensive Plan map.
(ii) Zoning Ordinance. The RS-8 zone is the corresponding zone for the Single
Family Urban 1 Comprehensive Plan designation. The purposes of the
proposed RS-8 zone are given in ECDC 16.20.000 (Attachment 5) and are
listed below.
Packet Page 224 of 253
R-2009-19_PB-StaffReport.doc Page 4 of 6
A.To reserve and regulate areas primarily for family living in single-family
dwellings.
B.To provide for additional nonresidential uses which compliment and are
compatible with single-family dwelling use.
The lots within the “Luschen’s Tracts – Division 2” Plat (Attachment 2) are all
roughly 80’ x 128’ or 10,240 square feet. Through the current multi-family
zoning designation there is a potential for several dwelling units per lot (1 unit
per 2,400 square feet of lot area means a potential for up to 4 dwelling units per
lot). At the proposed zoning designation (RS-8) there can only be one dwelling
unit per 8,000 square feet of lot area. The change to RS-8 would mean the
potential for multi-family development would be eliminated. This is consistent
with the original intent of the subdivision, as described during the Council
consideration of the Comprehensive Plan amendment in 2008.
Zone Street
Setback
Side
Setback
Rear
Setback Height Lot
Coverage Parking
RM-2.4 15’ 10’ 15’ 25’ 45% 2
RS-8 25’ 7.5’ 15’ 25’ 35% 2
(iii) Surrounding Area. Uses in the subject area are single family. The surrounding
area contains a mix of uses, including multi-family, medical and commercial
office uses.
(iv) Changes. The Comprehensive Plan designation for this neighborhood was
changed in 2008 in order to encourage the retention of single-family
development, and the zoning change is consistent with the amendment.
(v) Suitability. The neighborhood comprising the subject application has always
been developed with single-family homes. The neighborhood appears to be
both economically and physically suitable for the proposed zoning.
(vi) Value. The affect on value is uncertain. Assuming the value has been set
according to the long-standing single family development of the lots, the
change in zoning should have no net effect on value. However, properties on
the margins of the neighborhood (e.g. the two lots fronting on 76th Ave W)
could have their potential value reduced if they were hoping to increase their
development intensity.
c. Conclusions:
(i) The proposed rezone is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan land use
designation for the subject property.
(ii) The proposed rezone is consistent with the purposes of the zoning ordinance.
Based on the facts and analysis contained above, planning staff concludes that the proposal
satisfies the criteria for a change in zoning.
Packet Page 225 of 253
R-2009-19_PB-StaffReport.doc Page 5 of 6
2. ECDC Section 20.100.020 (Planning Advisory Board Review & City Council Action)
a. Facts & Analysis:
(i) The Planning Board reviews rezone requests and makes a recommendation to the
City Council per ECDC 20.100.020.A.1. The request at hand is a rezone, so the
Planning Board will make a recommendation to the Council after public
comments are taken into consideration.
(ii) The City Council shall consider the recommendation by the Planning Board.
Staff will schedule the proposal to go before the Council after the Planning Board
has made their recommendation.
b. Conclusion:
The proposed rezone is and will be compliant with the Edmonds Community
Development Code.
D. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
a. Facts:
This site was recently designated “Single Family – Urban 1.” No development proposals
have been received for this neighborhood. Relevant goals and policies include:
B.4. Support retention and rehabilitation of older housing within Edmonds whenever
it is economically feasible.
B.5. Protect residential areas from incompatible land uses through the careful control
of other types of development and expansion based upon the following
principles:
B.5.a. Residential privacy is a fundamental protection to be upheld by local
government.
B.5.b. Traffic not directly accessing residences in a neighborhood must be
discouraged.
B.5.c. Stable property values must not be threatened by view, traffic or land use
encroachments.
B.5.d. Private property must be protected from adverse environmental impacts
of development including noise, drainage, traffic, slides, etc.
b. Analysis:
The Comprehensive Plan Policies noted above encourage the retention of older housing
within Edmonds.
c. Conclusion:
The proposal appears to be consistent with the policy direction in the Comprehensive
Plan.
E. TECHNICAL COMMITTEE
No comments were received from City departments reviewing the proposal.
Packet Page 226 of 253
R-2009-19_PB-StaffReport.doc Page 6 of 6
F. PUBLIC COMMENTS
Two public comment letters were received to date – one in favor for the proposed rezone and
one against, outlined below.
1. Jim Underhill submitted a letter received 10/05/09 (Attachment 6) that outlines last
year’s Comprehensive Plan amendment. He argues that this is an affordable
neighborhood and supports the rezone of the neighborhood.
2. Alden Peppel, Susana Martinez, and Rosa Macias submitted a letter received 10/07/09
(Attachment 7) that argues that there will be a severe economic impact to property
owners specifically adjacent to 76th Avenue West and they feel that this is both
unnecessary and unacceptable. It is important to note that Mr. Peppel and Ms. Martinez
own the two western-most properties along 76th Avenue West. They express that the
density should not be decreased through the proposed zoning change to their properties
and believe that their street is not a typical single-family street. These owners oppose the
rezone request.
III. ATTACHMENTS
1. Zoning and aerial vicinity maps.
2. Plat map.
3. July 22, 2008 City Council Approved Minutes.
4. Public notices.
5. ECDC zoning regulations for RS-8 zone.
6. Letter from Jim Underhill.
7. Letter from Alden Peppel, Susana Martinez, and Rosa Macias.
V. PARTIES OF RECORD
Jim Underhill
7410 215th Street SW
Edmonds WA 98026
Alden R. Peppel
2017 Narrows View Circle NW – A203
Gig Harbor WA 98335
Susana Martinez
7527 215th Street SW
Edmonds WA 98026
Rosa Alivia Macias
7519 215th Street SW
Edmonds WA 98026
Packet Page 227 of 253
P
a
c
k
e
t
P
a
g
e
2
2
8
o
f
2
5
3
P
a
c
k
e
t
P
a
g
e
2
2
9
o
f
2
5
3
P
a
c
k
e
t
P
a
g
e
2
3
0
o
f
2
5
3
P
a
c
k
e
t
P
a
g
e
2
3
1
o
f
2
5
3
P
a
c
k
e
t
P
a
g
e
2
3
2
o
f
2
5
3
P
a
c
k
e
t
P
a
g
e
2
3
3
o
f
2
5
3
P
a
c
k
e
t
P
a
g
e
2
3
4
o
f
2
5
3
P
a
c
k
e
t
P
a
g
e
2
3
5
o
f
2
5
3
P
a
c
k
e
t
P
a
g
e
2
3
6
o
f
2
5
3
P
a
c
k
e
t
P
a
g
e
2
3
7
o
f
2
5
3
P
a
c
k
e
t
P
a
g
e
2
3
8
o
f
2
5
3
P
a
c
k
e
t
P
a
g
e
2
3
9
o
f
2
5
3
P
a
c
k
e
t
P
a
g
e
2
4
0
o
f
2
5
3
P
a
c
k
e
t
P
a
g
e
2
4
1
o
f
2
5
3
P
a
c
k
e
t
P
a
g
e
2
4
2
o
f
2
5
3
P
a
c
k
e
t
P
a
g
e
2
4
3
o
f
2
5
3
P
a
c
k
e
t
P
a
g
e
2
4
4
o
f
2
5
3
P
a
c
k
e
t
P
a
g
e
2
4
5
o
f
2
5
3
P
a
c
k
e
t
P
a
g
e
2
4
6
o
f
2
5
3
APPROVED NOVEMBER 4TH
CITY OF EDMONDS
PLANNING BOARD MINUTES
October 14, 2009
Chair Bowman called the meeting of the Edmonds Planning Board to order at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, Public
Safety Complex, 250 – 5th Avenue North.
BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT
Michael Bowman, Chair
Cary Guenther
Jim Young
Judith Works
Valerie Stewart
BOARD MEMBERS ABSENT
John Reed (excused)
Philip Lovell (excused)
Kevin Clarke (excused)
STAFF PRESENT
Rob Chave, Planning Division Manager
Gina Coccia, Planner
Stephen Clifton, Community Services/Economic Development
Director
Noel Miller, Public Works Director
Jerry Shuster, Stormwater Manager
Brian McIntosh, Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services Director
Rob English, City Engineer
Karin Noyes, Recorder
READING/APPROVAL OF MINUTES
BOARD MEMBER GUENTHER MOVED THAT THE MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 23, 2009 BE APPROVED AS
PRESENTED. BOARD MEMBER WORKS SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED
UNANIMOUSLY.
ANNOUNCEMENT OF AGENDA
No changes were made to the agenda.
AUDIENCE COMMENTS
There was no one in the audience to address the Board during this portion of the meeting.
PUBLIC HEARING ON REZONE (FILE #PLN20090019) TO CHANGE THE ZONING DESIGNATION FROM
MULTIPLE RESIDENTIAL (RM-2.4) TO SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (RS-8) ALONG A PORTION OF
215TH STREET SOUTHWEST. ALL PROPERTIES WERE SUBJECT TO A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
AMENDMENT THAT WAS APPROVED LAST YEAR (FILE #AMD20070014)
Ms. Coccia advised that the proposed rezone is for 19 lots along 215th Street Southwest lying east of 76th Avenue West
between Highway 99 and 76th Avenue West. The parcels were the subject of a Comprehensive Plan Map amendment in
2008, when the land use designation was changed from Mixed-Use Commercial to Single-Family Urban 1. The proposed
rezone was initiated by the City Council. She reminded the Board that after the public hearing, they will be asked to forward
a recommendation to the City Council about whether or not the proposed rezone is appropriate. The City Council would
make the final decision.
Packet Page 247 of 253
APPROVED
Planning Board Minutes
October 14, 2009 Page 2
Ms. Coccia pointed out that each property is roughly .25 acres and the area as a whole is approximately 4.5 acres. Each lot is
developed with one single-family home constructed in the 1950’s and 1960’s. The properties are located within the RM-2.4
zone. Edmonds Woodway High School is located to the west across 76th Avenue West and is zoned “Public.” Stevens
Hospital is to the south and is zoned “Medical Use,” and multi family development is located to the north and east on
properties that are zoned RM-2.4 and RM-1.5.
Ms. Coccia referred to Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) Section 20.40, which contains six criteria the
Board must consider when reviewing rezone applications. She reviewed each of the criteria as follows:
Whether the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. In 2008 the City Council approved a
Comprehensive Plan Map amendment to change the land use designation for the subject parcels from Mixed-Use
Commercial to Single-Family Urban 1, and the proposed new zone (RS-8) would be consistent with the new
Comprehensive Plan designation. The intent of the rezone is to make the zoning consistent with the Comprehensive
Plan.
Whether the proposal is consistent with the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance and whether the proposal is
consistent with the purposes of the proposed zone district. The RS-8 zone is the corresponding zone for the Single-
Family Urban 1 Comprehensive Plan designation.
The relationship of the proposed zoning change to the existing land uses and zoning of surrounding or nearby
property. Uses in the subject area are single family, and the surrounding area contains a mix of uses, including multi-
family, medical and commercial office uses.
Whether there has been sufficient change in the character of the immediate or surrounding area or in city policy
to justify the rezone. The Comprehensive Plan designation for the neighborhood was changed in 2008 in order to
encourage the retention of single-family development, and the proposed zoning would be consistent with the
amendment.
Whether the property is economically and physically suitable for the uses allowed under the existing zoning and
under the proposed zoning. The neighborhood comprising the subject application has always been developed with
single-family homes, and it appears to be both economically and physically suitable for the proposed zoning.
The relative gain to the public health, safety and welfare compared to the potential increase or decrease in value
to the property owners. The effect on value is uncertain. Assuming the value has been set according to the long-
standing single-family development of the lots, the change in zoning should have no effect on value. However,
properties on the margins of the neighborhood (e.g. the two lots fronting on 76th Avenue West) could have their
potential value reduced if they were hoping to increase their development intensity. The current RM-2.4 zoning would
allow up to four multi-family units on a ¼ acre lot, and the proposed RS-8 zoning would only allow one single-family
dwelling unit on each lot.
Ms. Coccia advised that based on the facts and analysis contained in the staff report, staff concludes that the proposal
satisfies the criteria for a change in zoning. She recommended the Board forward a recommendation of approval to the City
Council. She noted that members of the public have submitted letters regarding the proposed rezone, which were attached to
the Staff Report or distributed to the Board prior to the meeting.
Chair Bowman briefly reviewed the rules and procedures for the hearing and opened the public comment period.
Alden Peppel, Edmonds, said he has owned property at 7528 – 215th Street Southwest for 37 years, which is longer than
most of the other residents on the street. When he purchased his property, he knew that the land use designation was mixed-
use commercial and that the zoning in effect was RM-2.4, and most of the other home owners had the same understanding.
He expressed concern that the proposed rezone would result in a down grade of his property value, which is undesirable and
unacceptable. He invited the Board Members to ask themselves what actual public interest would be served by the proposed
rezone. He expressed his belief that the best use for possible expansion in any direction would be consistent with the current
Packet Page 248 of 253
APPROVED
Planning Board Minutes
October 14, 2009 Page 3
zoning. Mr. Peppel pointed out that the City’s Planning Board has twice (in 2001 and 2008) recommended denial of the
proposal, and it seems there are some other factors or special interests at work. Again, he asked the Board to please think
about what public interest is really being served by the proposed rezone. They don’t want to have to change the land use and
zoning again in a few years if the current zoning represents the highest and best use for the property, which is what the Board
previously recommended.
Susana Martinez, Edmonds, said she lives in the property she owns at 7527 - 215th Street Southwest, which is located in
the northern corner of the intersection of 76th Avenue West and 215th Street Southwest. She purchased her home in 1986
when she moved to the area from Spain to raise her family. Many changes have occurred between 1986 and today. The high
school has doubled in size and the hospital has grown to become a regional facility serving people from throughout the area.
There are numerous medical clinics on 76th Avenue West, along with a variety of condominium and apartment complexes.
In 1986 her backyard was forested with beautiful trees that were cut down to accommodate a condominium development,
which has been very well maintained and is very quiet and updated. The houses in the neighborhood are very old (50 years),
and they are inefficient regarding heating, windows, etc.
Ms. Martinez advised that she was an architect and urbanist by trade. From her experience, it is not a good thing to move
backwards with zoning. She noted it is impossible to predict the future, but several property owners have sold and moved
away over the past several years. While the area used to be a nice neighborhood, it is no longer the same. Houses are not
only homes, they are investments, and you don’t need to own a single-family house to have a home. She said she recently
learned that due to the current economic crisis, a house that was originally listed for $430,000 in 2008 is now being listed for
$261,000. The real estate agent acknowledged the problem that the house was old. This is just another example of why they
need to look towards the future and not down zone the properties.
Ms. Martinez reported that Mr. Underhill previously sent letters to all the property owners, and prepared a list of people who
signed a petition in support of his proposal. However, it is important to keep in mind that many of the people who signed the
petition no longer own property in the neighborhood. She thanked Mr. Underhill for inviting the neighbors to his home to
talk about improving schools, etc, but she acknowledged that the makeup of the neighborhood is very different now. She
summarized that when she purchased her home, there was no guarantee that the area would remain a residential
neighborhood forever. She encouraged the Board to allow the neighbors to move on and do their best with the investment
they have. Residents on 76th Avenue West are already subject to noise from ambulances and fire trucks, and the high school
with 2,000 students presents a challenge, as well. She voiced her opinion that it would be a mistake to change the zoning.
The current zoning allows for expansion and the possibility to use the properties more efficiently for condominiums in the
future. The future is for the community and not one individual who wants to keep the street as single-family residential.
Jim Underhill, Edmonds, said he would not entertain the comments that were just made regarding the list other than to
agree that the list is old because the process started several years ago. The proposal has been vetted in the public arena
before the City Council and the Planning Board on three occasions. The City Council voted 5-2 and 7-0 to support the
Comprehensive Plan Map amendment. The neighborhood has gone through the appropriate process and proven their case.
They presented it to those who have the authority to decide, and they stand with the City Council’s direction to move ahead
with the rezone change. This has been an open process from the beginning. There have been points throughout the process
where the proposal could have been stopped based on objections from the property owners in the neighborhood, but this did
not occur. He pointed out that many of the new property owners are also in favor of the proposal. There are other property
owners with equal standing as investors who have found no fault with the proposal.
Mr. Underhill referred the Board to the record of the City Council Meeting at which the Comprehensive Plan Map
amendment was approved. He noted that the Comprehensive Plan requires that the City have an adequate stock of affordable
housing. The public hearings were full of people who were in support of the proposal. The City’s future need for affordable
housing can be met by the proposed rezone, and the neighborhood would be protected at the same time. He commented that
after the City Council adopted the Comprehensive Plan Map amendment, many property owners in the neighborhood started
significant upgrade projects because they now see their properties will be protected and their values will be maintained.
They are moving forward with the future in mind because they intend to stay in the neighborhood with their families. This
has all been positive. He asked the Board to recommend approval of the proposed rezone, recognizing the City Council’s
view of the matter.
Packet Page 249 of 253
APPROVED
Planning Board Minutes
October 14, 2009 Page 4
Janice Freeman, Edmonds, reminded the Board that the next item on their agenda is the Community Sustainability Element
for the Comprehensive Plan. One of the City’s goals is to have places where people can walk to work, school and the bus
stations. Many of the people do not have a lot of money, and they need affordable places to live. She observed that Stevens
Hospital is the largest employer in Edmonds, and many of their employees make low salaries and work odd hours. The City
needs to provide space for affordable apartments to serve this population. She said she has studied the matter very carefully
and was on the Board when the issue was first presented. She has always been opposed to the rezone and she has not
changed her mind. She said she was amazed when the City Council went along with the idea of down grading the area to
single-family residential, especially the two properties on the corner of 76th Avenue West. She pointed out that multi-family
development in the subject area would be great for school teachers and people with small incomes and would allow more
people to live in the area. She said she is not in favor of the proposed rezone.
Jim Underhill, Edmonds, emphasized that people who live in the neighborhood have seen the remodeling projects that have
taken place over the past two years. For example, a house on 73rd Place on the corner closest to 216th Street is currently
being repainted and new windows are being installed. Two lots to the north, a property owner has undertaken a significant
remodel. Many of the existing apartment buildings have been renovated, and more condos are being built on the south side
of Edmonds Woodway High School. People who work for Stevens Hospital need to walk to work, and this issue is already
being addressed by the existing and planned multi-family developments in the area. The subject neighborhood also provides
an opportunity for people to be able to walk to work, school and the bus stops. When the new Swift Line begins service, he
will be able to walk three blocks from his house to get to the bus stop. The area needs consumers, and that is what the
neighborhood will continue to provide. It is a dynamic neighborhood right now, and they see a bright future for Highway 99
and the surrounding properties. Private homes, apartments and condominiums are being remodeled and people are moving
into the area.
THE PUBLIC PORTION OF THE HEARING WAS CLOSED.
Board Member Young recalled that he was the lone Board Member who supported the Comprehensive Plan Map amendment
that was subsequently approved by the City Council. Not only does the proposed rezone meet the six rezone criteria, but it
also addresses some of the Comprehensive Plan policies. As he stated before, there are not many neighborhoods in the City
that offer affordable single-family homes. He noted that Seattle and Kirkland have paid the price for doing away with their
affordable neighborhoods when planners got on the bandwagon about how density was the cure all for every social ill.
People who didn’t want to live in small, multi-family units were considered enemies of the environment. He recalled the
City has talked for years about the need to attract more young families to Edmonds. He questioned what is wrong with
preserving an affordable, single-family neighborhood that is close to transit facilities, etc. The neighborhood is just as much
of a contribution to the City of Edmonds economically in its present state.
Board Member Young said he has been engaged with volunteering on various boards for the City of Edmonds for many
years. He started out on the first Highway 99 Task Force. Everybody who had anything to do with commercial development
between 76th Avenue West and Highway 99 had the idea that making the zoning denser would be some magical solution to
the perceived problems. The subject properties have been zoned multi-family, commercial, etc. for at least 20 years, and no
significant changes have occurred. This presents a case that maybe the properties are supposed to be a single-family
neighborhood. The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again in the same way, while expecting a
different result. He said he is comfortable with the idea that it is single-family neighborhood that contributes a lot to the
City. It is something that will be affordable to people who don’t want to buy a condominium.
Board Member Guenther said he did not support the Comprehensive Plan Map amendment that was approved by the City
Council in 2008. However, that is not the issue before the Board at this time. The Board is being asked to make a
recommendation as to whether the proposed rezone would be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. While he is
uncomfortable with the situation, he agreed with the staff’s recommendation and would vote in favor of the proposal.
Board Member Works said she also voted against the Comprehensive Plan Map amendment. She said she understands that
the zoning map must be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, and that it was the City Council’s wish to change the
Comprehensive Plan Map. However, she has a concern about including the two lots on the corner at 76th Avenue West.
Packet Page 250 of 253
APPROVED
Planning Board Minutes
October 14, 2009 Page 5
These property owners would face a significant lose in value of their properties and the new zoning would be inconsistent
with all of the other uses along the street. The proposal would result in an island of single-family zoning, which would not
be appropriate. However, if the Board must make the zoning map consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, the Board is in a
very difficult position. She said she would not vote in favor of the proposed rezone.
Board Member Stewart said she would not vote in favor of the rezone, either. She said she visited the area and can
understand why they value their neighborhood. It is a little oasis, but it has been zoned RM-2.4 for a very long time and the
neighborhood is still intact. She noted that things evolve over time, and the Growth Management Act requires that the
Comprehensive Plan be updated every seven years to reflect changes in growth, etc. While the RS-8 zoning would be
consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, RM-2.4 zoning would also be consistent. She emphasized that change would not
occur overnight, but many urban areas are actually encouraging a mixture of uses (single-family and multi-family) in
neighborhoods that were previously single-family. Multi-family development would be a good thing for the economy
because it would bring more density to areas that are within walking distance of transit and other amenities. In addition,
there would be more neighbors for the single-family property owners to get to know if a multi-family development were to
be constructed within the neighborhood. She said she does not view the current zoning as a bad situation, and they would be
moving in the wrong direction to change the zoning to RS-8.
Chair Bowman agreed with Board Members Stewart and Works. He said he understands that the Board must review the six
rezone criteria, and he agreed with the summary of each one that was provided by staff. However, it seems that the whole
process could be considered a situation of gerrymandering in order to avoid waiting until the entire Comprehensive Plan is
updated in 2010-2011. The City Council made the decision to do whatever it takes to make the residents in this one area
happy, and he does not believe it was the right thing to do for the City. He suggested that, long term, the City needs to
review the Comprehensive Plan in terms of transportation and economic and environmental sustainability, and he felt the
recent amendment was short sighted. He suggested the Board’s task is to do what is right for the entire City and not just for
a few. He said he would not vote in favor of changing the zoning. However, the issue could be revisited as part of the 2010-
2011 Comprehensive Plan update when the Comprehensive Plan Map for the entire City would be reviewed.
Mr. Chave explained that the Board could address the issue in a number of ways. Regardless of whether the motion is for
approval or denial, he suggested it is important for the maker of the motion to clearly state the reasons for the motion. If the
motion is to deny the rezone application, the motion should indicate what the Board would like the City Council to do
instead.
BOARD MEMBER YOUNG MOVED THE BOARD FORWARD APPLICATION NUMBER PLN20090019 TO
THE CITY COUNCIL WITH A RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL BASED ON THE FOLLOWING:
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. IT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
ZONING ORDINANCE. THE PROPOSED ZONE IS CONSISTENT WITH THE PURPOSES OF THE
ZONING ORDINANCE, WHICH ACCORDING TO ECDC 16.70 IS TO “RESERVE AND REGULATE
AREAS PRIMARILY FOR FAMILY LIVING IN SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLINGS AND TO PROVIDE FOR
ADDITIONAL NON-RESIDENTIAL USES THAT COMPLIMENT AND ARE COMPATIBLE WITH
SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING USES.”
SURROUNDING AREA. THE RELATIONSHIP OF THE PROPOSED ZONING CHANGE TO THE
EXISTING LAND USE AND ZONING OF SURROUNDING OR NEARBY PROPERTIES IS CONSISTENT.
CHANGES. THERE HAS BEEN NO CHANGE TO THIS BLOCK OF HOUSES IN APPROXIMATELY 30
YEARS, AND THEY SEEM TO HAVE SERVED QUITE WELL. THIS CRITERIA DOES NOT SAY THERE
MUST BE CHANGE, BUT JUST THAT IT IS SUFFICIENT TO JUSTIFY THE REZONE APPLICATION.
SUITABILITY. THIRTY-SIX YEARS OF NOT BEING CONVERTED TO WHAT THE PROPERTY IS
CURRENTLY ZONED FOR MAKES THE CASE THAT THE PROPERTIES ARE CLEARLY UNSUITABLE
Packet Page 251 of 253
APPROVED
Planning Board Minutes
October 14, 2009 Page 6
FOR THE UNDERLYING ZONING AND THEY SHOULD BE ZONED CONSISTENT WITH THE USES
THAT HAVE BEEN IN EXISTENCE FOR THE PAST 30 YEARS.
VALUE. THE RELATIVE GAIN TO THE PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY AND WELFARE IS THE
PRESERVATION OF ONE OF THE LAST REMAINING AFFORDABLE SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
NEIGHBORHOODS IN THE CITY.
BOARD MEMBER GUENTHER SECONDED THE MOTION.
Board Member Works referred to the criteria related to the surrounding areas and pointed out that rezoning the subject
properties would create an island in the middle of other kinds of zoning. She said she does not think the proposed zoning
would be consistent with the surrounding uses. She also referred to the criteria related to change and pointed out that there
has been no change in the subject property or surrounding properties. The only change was the City Council’s decision to
amend the Comprehensive Plan Map. Regarding the Value Criteria, she suggested the proposed rezone would result in a
significant decrease in property value for at least the two properties on the corner of 76th Avenue West. When the hospital
expands in the future, the value of other properties in the neighborhood could also decrease.
Board Member Stewart referred to the original file, which suggested that the amendment would not be consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan or in the general public interest as expressed in the adopted language for the Highway 99 Activity
Center. The original file states that the overall uses in the activity center are to be more intensive. While this language does
not refer to the subject neighborhood, it does speak to the need to increase the vitality of the area. Changes will evolve over
time, and she cautioned against the City taking action to slow the change by down zoning. She said she would vote against
the motion.
THE MOTION FAILED 2-3, WITH BOARD MEMBERS YOUNG AND GUENTHER VOTING IN FAVOR AND
CHAIR BOWMAN AND BOARD MEMBERS STEWART AND WORKS VOTING IN OPPOSITION.
Once again, Chair Bowman voiced his concern about the process that was used to get the proposal to this point. The
proposed change should have been considered as part of the overall Comprehensive Plan update in 2010-2011. This would
allow the Board and the City Council to consider what is best for the entire City before a decision is made. He said he is
opposed to making a land use decision based on what is best for just a small group of people.
Board Member Young cautioned that the process is not on trial at this time. The City Council made a decision about the
Comprehensive Plan Map amendment, and a new designation has been attached to the subject properties. If the Board does
not think the proposed rezone meets the rezone criteria, they need to provide reasons to support their position. If they don’t
like the way the Comprehensive Plan was amended, they should address this concern with the City Council as a separate
issue. He emphasized that the Board must deal with this application based on the facts before them.
Mr. Chave suggested that in order to provide clarity to the City Council, the Board should explain how the proposed rezone
is inconsistent with the rezone criteria. He recalled that those who voted against the previous motion indicated some of the
reasons they would not vote in favor of the rezone proposal. If they are going to recommend denial of the application, they
should explain to the City Council what they want them to do instead.
BOARD MEMBER WORKS MOVED THE BOARD FORWARD FILE NUMBER PLN20090019 TO THE CITY
COUNCIL WITH A RECOMMENDATION OF DENIAL FOR THE REASON THAT THE BOARD WISHES TO
TAKE THE MATTER UP AGAIN AS PART OF THE OVERALL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE IN 2010-
2011 RATHER THAN SINGLING OUT THIS ONE SMALL AREA FOR CHANGE. CHAIR BOWMAN
SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 4-1, WITH BOARD MEMBER YOUNG VOTING IN
OPPOSITION.
Mr. Chave reported that the Board’s recommendation would be forwarded to the City Council, and they would make a final
decision. All those who testified at the hearing would receive a notice of when the City Council would consider the matter.
Packet Page 252 of 253
AM-2630 10.
City Attorney Annual Report
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:12/01/2009
Submitted By:Sandy Chase Time:15 Minutes
Department:City Clerk's Office Type:Information
Review Committee:
Committee Action:
Information
Subject Title
Annual Report - City Attorney
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Information only.
Previous Council Action
N/A
Narrative
Scott Snyder, City Attorney, will provide his annual report.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
No file(s) attached.
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 11/19/2009 03:40 PM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 11/19/2009 05:22 PM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 11/20/2009 08:39 AM APRV
Form Started By: Sandy
Chase
Started On: 11/19/2009 03:38
PM
Final Approval Date: 11/20/2009
Packet Page 253 of 253