2024-11-04 Council Special Packet AAgenda
Edmonds City Council
SPECIAL MEETING NOTICE
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
250 5TH AVE NORTH, EDMONDS, WA 98020
NOVEMBER 4, 2024, 5:30 PM
PERSONS WISHING TO JOIN THIS MEETING VIRTUALLY IN LIEU OF IN -PERSON ATTENDANCE CAN
CLICK ON OR PASTE THE FOLLOWING ZOOM MEETING LINK INTO A WEB BROWSER USING A
COMPUTER OR SMART PHONE:
HTTPS://ZOOM. US/J/95798484261
OR JOIN BY PHONE: US: +1 253 215 8782 WEBINAR ID: 957 9848 4261
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. COUNCIL BUSINESS
1. Council 2025-26 Budget Deliberations (45 min)
2. Transportation Priorities as part of the 2024 Transportation Plan (30 min)
ADJOURNMENT 6:45 PM
Edmonds City Council Agenda
November 4, 2024
Page 1
2.1
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 11/4/2024
Council 2025-26 Budget Deliberations
Staff Lead: City Council
Department: City Council
Preparer: Beckie Peterson
Background/History
On August 13, Council was briefed on the outcome of the City of Edmonds Community Survey.
On August 16, Council, Administration and Staff held a budget retreat.
On September 10, Council adopted Resolution 1553 regarding Council's priorities for the 2025-26
Biennial Budget.
On October 1, Mayor Rosen presented the proposed 2025-26 Biennial Budget.
On October 8, 15 and 22 Council received budget presentations from each city department.
On October 22 Council held a public hearing on property tax and revenue.
On October 29 Council held a public hearing on the preliminary budget.
On November 2, Council held a workshop on revenues and budget.
Recommendation
N/A
Narrative
Councilmembers will have discussion on the budget and amendments they would like to consider for
the 20242-26 Biennial Budget.
Attachments:
City of Edmonds Community Survey July 2024
Resolution 1553 2025-26 Council Budget Priorities
Packet Pg. 2
2.1.a
FM�
research
City of Edmonds
Community Survev
July 2024
Packet Pg. 3
2.1.a
Purpose and Methodology�MCProject reseor&
0
Survey of residents in Edmonds, WA to measure residents' priorities for future planning
and improvements, as well as general satisfaction with city government.
N
Multimodal live telephone/online survey of adult residents 18+ in the City of Edmonds. N
Respondents were randomly selected to participate from a proportional sample of residents.le
CD
Phone interviews were conducted in English by trained, professional interviewers; landlines and 21
mobile phones included.
Respondents also invited to participate via email/text invitations to a web survey.
400 total interviews conducted July 17-23, 2024
Overall margin of error ±4.9 percentage points
Response data weighted to be representative of residents aged 18+ in Edmonds, WA,
including by age, gender, ethnicity, and geographic demographics as estimated by the US
Census.
Please note that due to rounding, some percentages may not add up to exactly 100%.
24-9336 Edmonds Community Survey I
Packet Pg. 4
2.1.a
Key Findings and Conclusions
Overall, the mood among residents in Edmonds is quite positive and
satisfaction is high with city operations.
�E MC
resear&
0
0
N
The City also receives strong ratings on city government performance, both broadly N
and on specific services.
Housing affordability, crime and public safety, and overdevelopment
concerns are top -of -mind priorities for residents.
When it comes to the importance of various city services, residents place
strong importance on response times of emergency services, maintaining
roads, and reducing crime.
However, just two -in -five residents are satisfied with the City's efforts to reduce petty
crime and burglary, and only a third of residents are satisfied with the city's planning
for population growth — areas of opportunity for the City to enhance its focus.
24-9336 Edmonds Community Survey
Packet Pg. 5
2.1.a
LMC,
research
Quality of Life and
Priorities
Packet Pg. 6
2.1.a
Overall Mood and O timism
�MC N
prPseorcF
Nearly all residents give a positive rating for the quality of life in Edmonds. Moreover, three-quarters of residents also think
things are moving in the right direction in the city.
m
How would you rate the quality of life in Edmonds?
Positive
94 %
Good 50%
Q2/Q5
Negative
5%
Only Fair 5%
! Do you feel that things in Edmonds are generally N
Poor 1% I
going in the right direction or do you feel things o
have gotten off on the wrong track? N
Right Direction
74%
24-9336 Edmonds Community Survey I
Packet Pg. 7
2.1.a
Overall Quality of life by Demographics Xmc,d
Residents are broadly positive about the quality of life in Edmonds, but the proportion of 'Excellent' ratings varies by age,
Overall
Male (47%)
Female (53%)
18-49 (46%)
50-64 (26%)
65+ (28%)
White (78%)
BIPOC (21%)
98020/West (45%)
98026/East (55%)
Homeowner (76%)
Non -Homeowner (24%)
Less than $110K (31%)
$110K or above (53%)
ethnicity, and geography. 3
m
How would you rate the quality of life in Edmonds?
a Excellent Good (Don't know) Only fair
50%
52%
49%
57%
54%
46%
65% i
LO
(N
CD
■ Poor N
_ N
0
N
5% ' 3
a�
A
3
mW 4%' U)
2 C 0% 40%J +�+
41
3
_ 4%. E
U
N
E
MORT o w
-40� C
_
a�
E
24-9336 Edmonds Community Survey I 1 0
ca
Q
Packet Pg. 8
2.1.a
Top -of -Mind Positives - Open Ended
Residents appreciate the small-town feel, waterfront access, and quiet community in Edmonds.
Thinking about life in Edmonds, what do you like best about living here?
(Select verbatim responses are displayed*)
�E MC
resear&
*Due to survey length constraints, responses for this question limited to 100n
Q3. 24-9336 Edmonds Community Survey
Packet Pg. 9
2.1.a
�M C N
TopPriorities for Edmonds — Open EndedrPsear&
Housing affordability is a top -of -mind concern to residents, as is public safety. Overdevelopment concerns are also cited.
If you could only pick one issue, what do you think should be the top priority for the City
of Edmonds government to address over the next two years?
(Open-ended question; Verbatim responses coded into categories below)
Housing affordability
14%
���70910
Crime/Public safety
Overdevelopment/Growth
9%
Budget/Fiscal responsibility
7%
Road/Transportation infrastructure
] 6%
Parking
6%
Traffic safety/enforcement
6%
Homelessness
5%
Bike/Pedestrian lanes
5%
Cost of living/Taxes
5%
Schools/Education
4%
Climate change/Environment
3%
Parks/Recreation
3%
Maintaining city aestheticz
3%
Other
=�Wr 11%
24-9336 Edmonds Community Survey I I
Packet Pg. 10
2.1.a
LFMCI City Ratings and Priorities
research
Packet Pg. 11
2.1.a
Edmonds Job Ratin s
�MC N
greseorcF 0
A majority of residents rate the city's job performance positively, but ratings are soft with few saying 'Excellent'
or 'Poor'
Excellent Good (Don't know/Refused) Only fair ■ Poor
Total
Total
CD
N
Pos.
Neg.
N
The job Edmonds city government does
65% 23% '.
overall &LMM
71%
28%
0
N
N
0
N
The job the City of Edmonds does delivering
services effectively
The job the City does keeping community
members informed regarding city programs,
initiatives, projects, and issues
The job the City does focusing on the
priorities that matter most to community
members
Q6-Q9. Using a scale of excellent, good, only fair, or poor, please rate each of the following.
78% 21%
61% 39%
61% 38%
24-9336 Edmonds Community Survey 1 11
Packet Pg. 12
2.1.a
Re ional Job Ratin Com arison
�MC N
g g p rPsear&
Positive ratings of Edmonds overall government performance are comparable to recent ratings in other municipalities.
m
Overall
The job Edmonds city government does overall N
71%
LO
N
O
N
% Excellent/Good N
Q6. Using a scale of excellent, good, only fair, or poor, please rate each of the following.
64% 65% 64%
24-9336 Edmonds Community Survey I 1
Packet Pg. 13
2.1.a
Overall Job Ratingbv,,r Dernographicr�MC resear& 0
Residents of color have more negative ratings of city job performance than other groups.
m
The job Edmonds city government does overall N
LO
N
O
Excellent/Good (Don't know) ■ Only fair/Poor N
Overall • . o
Male (47%)
Female (53%)
18-49 (46%)
50-64 (26%)
65+ (28%)
White (78%)
BIPOC (21%)
98020/West (45%)
98026/East (55%)
70%
69%
Homeowner (76%) . •' . ' .
Non -Homeowner (24%) •' . •' .
Less than $110K (31%) '.
$110K or above (53%) '.
Q6-Q9. Using a scale of excellent, good, only fair, or poor, please rate each of the following.
24-9336 Edmonds Community Survey 1 1;
Packet Pg. 14
2.1.a
Perce tions of Cit Services
�MC N
p y - 0
resear&
Most residents feel satisfied and informed about city services, but few are emphatically so.
■ Strongly ■ Somewhat Don't know/ ■ Somewhat ■ Strongly
Aaraa Aaraa Nnt ciira Disagree Disagree
I am satisfied with types and quality of services
provided by the City of Edmonds.
feel well informed about the type and quality of
services the City of Edmonds provides.
Q10-11. Please indicate whether you agree or disagree with the following statements.
m
Total Total Net N
Agree Disagree Agre( o
N
73% 22%
4% 23% •' 64% 32%
+51
+32
24-9336 Edmonds Community Survey 1 1;
Packet Pg. 15
2.1.a
LMCI
research
City Service Ratings
Packet Pg. 16
2.1.a
Top City Services by Importance Rating
W
Next you will read a list of city services and functions provided by the City of Edmonds.
After each one, please rate how important that city service is to you.
Ensuring fast fire and emergency medical response times
Reducing petty crime and burglary
Cracking down on illegal drug use and sales
Maintaining parks, trails, and open spaces
Maintaining streets and fixing potholes
Stewarding the environment
Planning for population growth
I Investing in and expanding parks, trails, and open spaces
Preparing for natural disasters such as earthquakes, flooding, and
major storms
Q12-Q30.
7 - Extremely important
I
1
�E MC
resear&
0
m
5-6 Total Importance o
u;
25% 94% o
33% 86%
' 24%
46%
' 549A/
69
76%
90
92%
75%
73%
73%
24-9336 Edmonds Community Survey I I
X
Packet Pg. 17
Additional Services by Importance Rating
Next you will read a list of city services and functions provided by the City of Edmonds.
After each one, please rate how important that city service is to you.
�MC.O
resear&
0
m
7 - Extremely important 5-6 Total Importance N
LO
Supporting the arts and cultural events I 39% 69% o
N
Strictly enforcing building and development codes 36% 66% o
Preparing for the impacts of climate change 34%
Improving and expanding sidewalks 44%
Providing services to help the homeless and people in need 33%
Improving traffic safety and enforcement 38/
Providing additional parking opportunities 36%
Attracting new businesses and jobs � 41%
Incentivizing the development of diverse housing types �L29/ 0 48/
Improving and expanding bike paths
Q12-Q30.
38%
64
71%
61%
63
59%
61%
24-9336 Edmonds Community Survey 11i
Packet Pg. 18
Top City Services by Satisfaction Rating �EMC.O0
Next you will read the same list of city services or functions provided by the City of
Edmonds. After each, please rate how satisfied you are with each aspect of city service.
m
7 - Very satisfied 5-6 Total Satisfied N
u;
Supporting the arts and cultural events 50% 77% o
N
Ensuring fast fire and emergency medical response times 40% 69% o
Maintaining parks, trails, and open spaces
Improving traffic safety and enforcement
Investing in and expanding parks, trails, and open spaces
Improving and expanding bike paths
Attracting new businesses and jobs
Stewarding the environment
Maintaining streets and fixing potholes
Improving and expanding sidewalks
Q32-Q50.
50%
39% 52%
44% 53%
32%
41%
40 %
37%
34 %
44 %
47 %
47 %
44 %
41%
72%
24-9336 Edmonds Community Survey 1 1
Packet Pg. 19
Additional Services bySatisfaction Rating
Next you will read the same list of city services or functions provided by the City of
Edmonds. After each, please rate how satisfied you are with each aspect of city service.
�E MC
resear&
0
m
7 - Very satisfied 5-6 Total Satisfied CD
Reducing petty crime and burglary 11'1 37% 41%
Providing additional parking opportunities
Preparing for natural disasters such as earthquakes, flooding, and .,
major storms
Preparing for the impacts of climate change
Cracking down on illegal drug use and sales
Providing services to help the homeless and people in need
Planning for population growth
Strictly enforcing building and development codes
Incentivizing the development of diverse housing types
30% 38%
27% 36%
24% 32 %
31% 35%
23% 30%
27% 31%
26% 30%
23% 26%
LO
N
0
N
Q32-Q50. 24-9336 Edmonds Community Survey I I '
Packet Pg. 20
2.1.a
Analysis: Satisfaction Vs. ImportanlL,
EMC
Gap
While most satisfaction ratings fall relatively close to the perceived importance of each service, residents believe the city is
underperforming on reducing petty crime and drug usage, fixing potholes and sidewalks, and planning for growth/coding.
Mean Score (1— 7) Satisfaction Gap
°a
1.00
'Ju 3.00 4.0(' 6.00 7.001 -2.00 -1.00 0.00 i.uu 2.00LO
N
Improving and expanding bike paths
Satisfaction
o
N
Supporting the arts and cultural events
exce----ort--
Iq
--——————————— — — — — —— — — —
Attracting new businesses and jobs
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — -- ---------------
N
Incentivizing the development of diverse housing types
I
>,
Preparing for the impacts of climate change
I
Improving traffic safety and enforcement
I
�'
m
Investing in and expanding parks, trails and open spaces
3
Preparing for natural disasters such as earthquakes, flooding, and major storms
Satisfaction is
U)
Providing additional parking opportunities
I comparable to
importance
r
=
Stewarding the environment
I
Maintaining parks, trails, and open spaces
E
Ensuring fast fire and emergency medical response times
AI
O
U
services to help the homeless and people in need
I
N
- — — — — — — — — —Providing
— — —
Strictly enforcing building and development codes
— — — — — — — — --———————————————--------———————— — — — — ——
I
-
o
Improving and expanding sidewalks
E
Planning for population growth
Satisfaction
W
Cracking down on illegal drug use and sales
■ Satisfaction
underperforms
I importance
,-
O
Maintaining streets and fixing potholes
I
■ Importance Reducing petty crime and burglary
V
c
m
E
24-9336 Edmonds Community Survey 1 1!
0
�a
r
r
Q
Packet Pg. 21
2.1.a
FM�
research
c
0
w
L
0
M�
W
N
LO
N
O
N
N
O
N
d
U)
7
E
E
O
U
c
A ppendixW
a
Packet Pg. 22
Respondent Profile
Gender
][47% 53%
Age
46%
26% 28%
18-49 50-64 65+
IIncome
Less than $110,000 31`,
$110,000 or above
M
PNR 16%
Ethnicity
Hispanic/Latino
4%
White
78%
Black
2%
Asian
11%
Other/PNR
15%
Survey population demographics are consistent with general population estimates within Edmonds, WA (U.S. Census)
�MC.o
researcf 0
Zip Code
1445Y, '
k. West/98020 East/98026
i
Homeownership
76%
24%
J=
i
Homeowner Renter/Other
E
24-9336 Edmonds Community Survey 1 2' i
Packet Pg. 23
2.1.a
Service Satisfaction by Demographics0
�MC resear&
Older residents, as well as white residents, are most satisfied with the types and quality of city services.
m
I am satisfied with types and quality of services provided by the City of Edmonds. N
LO
N
O
■ Agree Don't know ■ Disagree N
Overall
Male (47%)
Female (53%)
18-49 (46%)
50-64 (26%)
65+ (28%)
White (78%)
BIPOC (21%)
98020/West (45%)
98026/East (55%)
Homeowner (76%)
Non -Homeowner (24%)
Less than $110K (31%)
$110K or above (53%)
Q10. Please indicate whether you agree or disagree with the following statements.
5%
' m 23%
•' 17%
24-9336 Edmonds Community Survey 12;
Packet Pg. 24
2.1.a
Service Awareness b Demo ra h ics
�MC N
y g p 0
resear&
Residents in eastern Edmonds feel less informed about services, as do BIPOC residents.
m
1 feel well informed about the type and quality of services the City of Edmonds provides. N
LO
N
O
Agree Don't know ■ Disagree N
Overall 4% o
Male (47%)
Female (53%)
18-49 (46%)
50-64 (26%)
65+ (28%)
White (78%)
BIPOC (21%)
98020/West (45%)
98026/East (55%)
Homeowner (76%)
Non -Homeowner (24%)
Less than $110K (31%)
$110K or above (53%)
4%
i
66%
NFL 53%
64% W 33%
66% 28%
68% IMA. 28%
63% En 33%
Q11. Please indicate whether you agree or disagree with the following statements.
24-9336 Edmonds Community Survey 1 2;
Packet Pg. 25
2.1.a
�E MC N
City Service Importance Ratings researcr0
Most city services are rated as important, particularly for first responder services and maintaining public parks/roads.
Ensuring fast fire and emergency medical response times
Reducing petty crime and burglary
Cracking down on illegal drug use and sales
Maintaining parks, trails, and open spaces
Maintaining streets and fixing potholes
Stewarding the environment
Planning for population growth
Investing in and expanding parks, trails, and open spaces
Preparing for natural disasters such as earthquakes, flooding, and major storms
Supporting the arts and cultural events
Strictly enforcing building and development codes
Improving and expanding sidewalks
Improving traffic safety and enforcement
Providing services to help the homeless and people in need
Preparing for the impacts of climate change
Providing additional parking opportunities
Attracting new businesses and jobs
Incentivizing the development of diverse housing types
Improving and expanding bike paths
1.0 2.0
Q12-Q30. Next you will read a list of city services and functions provided by the City
of Edmonds. After each one, please rate how important that city service is to you.
Mean (1-7) % Extremely Important m
• ' 68% N
• 52% N
• 51% N
• U 44 % N
• R 38% N
36%
32% ;
32%
30%
30%
28%
' 30%
' 24%
20%
20%
12%
3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0
24-9336 Edmonds Community Survey 12.
Packet Pg. 26
2.1.a
�E MC N
City Service Satisfaction Ratings res earc 0
Residents are most satisfied with first responder response times, support for arts and culture, and parks/open spaces.
Ensuring fast fire and emergency medical response times
Supporting the arts and cultural events
Maintaining parks, trails, and open spaces
Investing in and expanding parks, trails, and open spaces
Attracting new businesses and jobs
Improving traffic safety and enforcement
Preparing for natural disasters such as earthquakes, flooding, and major storms
Stewarding the environment
Improving and expanding bike paths
Preparing for the impacts of climate change
Strictly enforcing building and development codes
Cracking down on illegal drug use and sales
Providing additional parking opportunities
Maintaining streets and fixing potholes
Providing services to help the homeless and people in need
Reducing petty crime and burglary
Improving and expanding sidewalks
Planning for population growth
Incentivizing the development of diverse housing types
Mean (1-7)
% Very Satisfied m
28 , N
• 27% N
o c
N
iVal
21/
': 9%
': 7%
' 13%
' 8%
' 7%
' ' 12%
' 8%
'
4%
' 4%
' 8%
1.0
Q32-Q50. Next you will read the same list of city services or functions provided by the City of
Edmonds. After each, please rate how satisfied you are with each aspect of city service.
2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0
24-9336 Edmonds Community Survey 1 2'
Packet Pg. 27
2.1.a
1EMC.,
research
Ian Stewart
ian@emcresearch.com
206.204.8032
Brendan Kara
brendan@emcresearch.com
202.686.5902
Harrison Louie
harrison@emcresearch.com
Packet Pg. 28
2.1.b
RESOLUTION NO. 1553
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS.
WASi iLNGTON, REGARDING COUNCIL. PRIORITIES FOR THE 2025-2026
BIENNIAL BUDGET
WI IE:REAS, the City Council, as a legislative body, adopts the city's budget; and
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Ordinance 4301 establishing a biennial budgeting process
effective January 1, 2025; and
WHEREAS. Resolution 1532, passed by Council in November 2023, addressed the identified
fiscal imbalance, authorized use of general fund operating rescrti,es, and declared a fiscal
emergency. and
WHEREAS, in January 2024, the mayor established a Blur -Ribbon Panel to provide guidance on
fiscal recovery and rt-silienc:e. In July, the Blue -Ribbon Panel prc%cntrd to Council and the
public their recommendations, including modifying budget development practices and
implementing priority -based budgeting measures; and
WHEREAS. the administration conducted a statistically valid community survey, gauging the
importance of multiple city functions, and these findings were shared with Council on August
13, 2024; and
WHEREAS, the City Council held a budget retreat on August 16, 2024 and discussed areas of
emphasis and improvements for Edmonds over the next three to seven years; and
WHEREAS, throughout this budget priority discussion, the Council expressed appreciation and
commitment to equity considerations in all budgeting and prioritizing decisions, and reinforced
the shared accountability ofadopting a fiscally responsible and balanced budget;
NOW THEREFORE, THE: CITY COU'NCII. OF 11IE CCTV OF EMMONDS,
WASIIINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The City Council would like to prioriti/t funding in the following areas, listed
in order of councilineniber priority vote during the retreat exercise:
• Safety. including fire and emergency medical services, police, and emergency
preparedness. (5 votes)
• Environment, including preserving natural assets and resources, climate action and
resiliency. (4 votes)
• investment in infrastructure, including safe,'aceessibie transportation and connectivity,
capital improvements and maintenance. (3 votes)
Packet Pg. 29
2.1.b
• Public and Human Services, Edmonds -specific support for our residents in need.
including homelessness prevention and resources. (3 votes)
• Livability, creating a welcoming, safe and vibrant environment in our neighborhmAs,
parks, businesses, and other gathering places. (3 votes)
• Economic Resiliency, including fiscal accountability and collaborative recovery.
economic development support across the city. (3 votes)
RESOLVED this 10'" day of September 2024.
ATTEST:
T:t
CITY OF EDMONDS
MAY , MI ROSEN
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: September 6, 2024
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: September 10, 2024
RESOLUTION NO. 1553
Packet Pg. 30
2.2
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 11/4/2024
Transportation Priorities as part of the 2024 Transportation Plan
Staff Lead: Rob English
Department: Engineering
Preparer: Emiko Rodarte
Background/History
On May 16, 2023, the Council approved the Professional Services Agreement with Transpo Group for the
Transportation Plan Update.
On May 2, 2023, Staff and Transpo Group made a presentation on Multimodal Level of Service to the
City Council.
On March 14, 2023, staff presented the preliminary scope of work and fee with Transpo Group to
complete the Transportation Plan Update.
On February 13, 2024, staff presented an MMLOS update to the Parks and Public Works Committee.
On February 27, 2024, staff presented an MMLOS update to City Council.
On June 11, 2024, staff provided a presentation on the Transportation Plan Update.
On September 10, 2024 staff provided a presentation on the Transportation Plan Update.
Staff Recommendation
Approve the removal of Multi -Use Path projects along minor arterial streets.
Narrative
The Transportation Plan is a mandatory element of the City's Comprehensive Plan. The last update to
the Transportation Plan was completed in 2015. The main objective of this Plan is to identify short and
long-range strategies that lead to the development of an integrated multimodal transportation system
that facilitates the safe and efficient movement of people and goods while addressing current and
future transportation demand and land use.
During the development of the draft Transportation Plan and project list, Multi -Use Path (MUP) projects
were identified along State Routes (Hwy 99, SR-104, and SR-524) and on minor arterial streets
throughout the City (such as 220th St. SW, 212th St. SW, 76th Ave. W, 244th St. SW, etc.). Most of the
minor arterial streets where MUP projects were proposed already have existing bike lanes and sidewalks
on both sides of the street.
Packet Pg. 31
2.2
The preliminary project list includes approximately 100 transportation projects. There are ten MUP
projects, covering approximately ten miles of minor arterial streets, that have a total cost of
approximately $160M. Staff recommends removing these MUP projects from the Plan due to the high
cost and low probability of securing grants to build them. Projects where existing sidewalks and/or bike
lanes are present would typically have lower scores compared to projects that are building or
completing a multi -modal network.
There are two MUP projects on arterial streets that remain on the preliminary project list:
MUP-01: Olympic View Dr. from 761h Ave. W to City Limits since there are no existing bike
lanes along this segment and this addition is only possible with roadway widening (=> new
sidewalk needed) and
MUP-13: 228`h St. SW from Hwy 99limits to the City limits since there are neither existing
bike lanes nor sidewalks along this segment.
Staff recommends keeping the proposed MUP projects on State Routes to align with the WSDOT policy
to incorporate the principles of complete streets in the design and construction of projects on State
Routes. The policy was in response to legislation (ESSB 5974) approved in 2022. The policy supports
complete streets and the goal is to provide access for all users including pedestrians, bicyclists and
public transportation users, on projects constructed on State Highways.
Both recommendations are supported by the Transportation Committee and the North Sound Bike
Advocacy Group.
Eliminating the MUP projects on minor arterial streets will reduce the number of proposed projects to
88 and lower the total project cost by $160M (refer to attachment 3 for the preliminary list of projects).
Attachments:
Attachment 1 - Roadway and Intersection Project Map
Attachment 2 - Active Transportation Project Map
Attachment 3 - Revised Project List
Packet Pg. 32
FISH"00
2.2.a
LEGEND
• Intersection Project
o Roadway Project
I Edmonds City Limits
Puget Sound
FER _ \
O!
t
3A
Park
A
Mpq�
°4
168TH ST SW
Meadawdale
O Middle School
9lF,
Meado
d!,
High
School
176TH ST SW
I BOTH ST SW I
3
w
w
Q
Q
F`
2
188TH ST SW
Edmonds 3 200TH ST SW 'I
Community W
College a r r.1"IMMi
,o 19 204TH ST SW
-loll
208TH ST SW
1 ^ 212TH ST SW
P�
WWI M
TH PL SWmill
3 3
Q Q
f9 m e 111
0 1111
286TH ST SW
� _ �„'
Lake 111
Ballinger \ 1-�
■� ■ 244TH ST SW • ' .'� �7�
1 , ''�1 I
A,
�Roadway and Intersection Projects
~ City of Edmonds Transportation Element
DRAFT transpo
FIGURE
C^
Packet Pg. 33
M:\22\1.22355.00 - Edmonds TE Update\GIS\ArcGISPro\Edmonds_TE_Update\Edmonds_TE_Update\Edmonds_TE_Update.aprx
2.2.b
FISH400
LEGEND A
Project Type N
= Multi Use Path ivieaaou as
Beach
= Sidewalk I Park
= Sidewalk - Local Street
Sidewalk and Bike r �."�,
Lanes
168TH ST SW
= Bike Lanes S� Meadmotale
Middle School Mead
= Trail �a h°
� Edmonds City Limits
L SW-101
Snohomish 176TH ST SW
County O� ��
Park 3,o O A^
ISOTH ST SW I
CO
L SW-104 c _J
W O J
Puget Sound O � A ;
L L SW' 01 5 a
SW-129
L (n [� ~ 188TH ST SW
SW-110 w J L Vly�
J SW-108 °�
L SW-109
cn ;
1`2 a
pUGET D 1 C x MUP-03 I96TH ST SW
A O
O
MUP-05' ?� Pon
CASPERS ST N ems- N�� Edmonds 200TH ST SW a1
1 r 11((II Community
OS. FER \ ` `O OPT LO `m 1� O to O College
p F r`r9 �IT.IILitiIM��
Jm : J J II(I ,o I 204TH ST SW
BL-16 - w" BL-01 p°iJ L SW-115 Ploc
UP-07e ���
MMiddle Ins
208TH ST S
V
0 0.5
L SW-116
a II
L SW-11111
rust rj1
MPa kial
w
3
Q
W
��
F. MUP-22
a
¢ '^
City C
Park a SW-32
90
w�OLNh•'7Y
ao
L SW` 0
Edmonds)
gh °away
High School
212TH ST SW
gem
M N CO
J r
U)
L SW-119
llll
a J
J 2
� �—MUP-21
Cn
/ � L Cn
GAJ ;W-125 � �1
a 7�
6
SAY
pO� �� c EDMONOS
N SW-17 SW-15 �G-o
�Z L ----I 127 S+�
� �s
�� ?° S
f0 M°dron
aD `� 1..
L)
__�
F J _
1MILES
1
20TH ST SW
I
226 PH PL SW 3 3
228TH ST SW
Q
SW-22 SW-23��� f9�FL J111
m4 'r1111
W-21 �W_30 S ` °a �,II
236TH ST SW _
�Lm_SW 2l SW-24
Lake I�111
p Ad Ilinger
MUP-
18 8m �'\��
, 244TH ST SW • .'i ���
�mid MMME��� 'OUNI
4r
Active Transportation Projects
City of Edmonds Transportation Element DRAFT
FIGURE
transpo
Packet Pg. 34
M:\22\1.22355.00 - Edmonds TE Update\GIS\ArcGISPro\Edmonds_TE_Update\Edmonds_TE_Update\Edmonds_TE_Update.aprx
2.2.c
No.
Project ID new_ProjectlD Project Type Street Name Extents Shape_Length (Feet)
1
R-06
R-06
Roadway
SR-99 Revitalization Project from 234th to 238th St (Stage 6)
234th to 238th St
1,470
2
BL-01
BL-01
Bike Lanes
Main St
9th Ave to 84th Avenue (5 corners)
5,721 N
3
BL-02
BL-02
Bike Lanes
OLYMPIC AVE
Main Street to Puget Drive
4,011 N
4
BL-14
BL-14
Bike Lanes
238TH ST SW
SR 104 to SR 99
2,316 4)
5
BL-15
BL-15
Bike Lanes
9TH AVE
Main Street to Caspers Street
2,638
6
BL-16
BL-16
Bike Lanes
MAIN ST
Ferry Terminal to 9th Avenue
4,545 0
7
BL-17
BL-17
Bike Lanes
76th Ave W
220th St SW to SR 99
1,899
ca
8
1-01
1-01
Intersection
Puget Dr. @ OVD Signal Upgrades
at intersection
Q
9
1-02
1-02
Intersection
100th Ave. W @ 238th St. SW Signal Upgrades
at intersection
M
10
1-03
1-03
Intersection
Main St. @ 3rd Signal Upgrades
at intersection
11
1-04
1-04
Intersection
76th Ave. W @ 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements
at intersection
SR 524 (196th St. SW) @ 88th Ave W. Intersection
0
12
1-05
1-05
L
Intersection
Improvements
at intersection
d
13
1-06
1-06
Intersection
Main St. @ 9th Ave.
at intersection
=
Westgate / SR-104 @ 100th Ave. W Intersection Access
0
14
1-08
1-08
Intersection
Management
at intersection
15
1-09
1-09
Intersection
SR-104 @ 95th Pl. W Intersection Improvements
at intersection
0
16
1-10
1-10
Intersection
SR-104 @ 238th St. SW Intersection Improvements
at intersection
=
SR-104 @ 76th Ave. W Non -motorized Transportation
ca
17
1-11
1-11
L
Intersection
Improvements
at intersection
H
18
1-12
1-12
Crossing
76TH AVE W
76th Ave W near 75th PI W
19
ITS-01
ITS-01
Roadway
SR 104
236th St Sw to 226th St SW
6,981 M
C
20
ITS-02
ITS-02
Roadway
76TH AVE
206th St SW to 220th St SW
4,634 0
21
L SW-101
L SW-101
Sidewalk
176 ST SW
72nd Ave W to 68th Ave SW
1,368 N
22
L SW-102
L SW-102
Sidewalk
72ND AVE W
Olympic View Drive to 176th St SW
2,940
23
L SW-103
L SW-103
Sidewalk
ANDOVER ST
184th ST SW to Olympic View Drive
1,543
24
L SW-104
L SW-104
Sidewalk
184TH ST SW
88th Ave W to 80th Ave W
2,147 FA
25
L SW-105
L SW-105
Sidewalk
186TH ST SW
185th PI SW to 80th Ave W
2,147 J
r
26
L SW-106
L SW-106
Sidewalk
84TH AVE W
186th St SW to 188th St SW
674 v
27
L SW-107
L SW-107
Sidewalk
189TH PL SW
80th Ave W to 76th Ave W
1,483 p
28
L SW-108
L SW-108
Sidewalk
191ST ST SW
80th Ave W to 76th Ave W
L
1,379 d
29
L SW-109
L SW-109
Sidewalk
192ND ST SW
88th Ave W to 86th Ave W
703
d
30
L SW-110
L SW-110
Sidewalk
190TH PL SW
Olympic View Drive to 94th Ave W
782 N
31
L SW-111
L SW-111
Sidewalk
WALNUT ST
Existing sidewalk to 7th Ave
273 d
32
L SW-113
L SW-113
Sidewalk
92ND AVE W
189th PI SW to 187th St SW
808
33
L SW-114
L SW-114
Sidewalk
12TH AVE N
Existing sidewalk end to Vista Way
1,269 M
34
L SW-115
L SW-115
Sidewalk
82ND AVE W
206th St SW to 204th St SW
704 C
35
L SW-116
L SW-116
Sidewalk
6TH AVE S
Existing sidewalk at 8th to 9th Ave
631
36
L SW-117
L SW-117
Sidewalk
98TH AVE W
Existing sidewalk north of 220th St SW to 216th PI SW
821 t
37
L SW-118
L SW-118
Sidewalk
92ND AVE W
218th St SW to 216th St SW
663 M
38
L SW-119
L SW-119
Sidewalk
218TH ST SW
84th Ave W to 76th Ave W
w
2,664 Q
39
L SW-120
L SW-120
Sidewalk
216TH ST SW
92nd Ave W to 86th Ave W
2,124 ;
40
L SW-122
L SW-122
Sidewalk
PARADISE LN
SR 104 to 7th Ave S
1,673 d
41
L SW-123
L SW-123
Sidewalk
6th AVE
Elm Way to Pine St
772 E
42
L SW-124
L SW-124
Sidewalk
8TH AVE S
14th St SW to Elm St
1,328 v
43
L SW-125
L SW-125
ISidewalk
114TH ST SW
18th Ave S to 96th Ave W
1,507
44
L SW-127
L SW-127
ISidewalk
1234TH ST SW
197th PI W to 96th Ave W
603
Packet Pg. 35
2.2.c
No.
Project ID new ProjectlD Project Type Street Name Extents Shape_Length (Feet)
45
L SW-128
L SW-128
Sidewalk
12TH AVE NW
southern City limits to 238th St SW
1,980
46
L SW-129
L SW-129
Sidewalk
188TH ST SW
92nd Ave W to 88th Ave W
1,049 N
47
MUP-01
MUP-01
Multi Use Path
OLYMPIC VIEW DR
76th Ave W to City Limits (Meadowdale Middle School)
7,772 N
48
MUP-03
MUP-03
Multi Use Path
196TH ST SW
88th Ave W to 76th Ave W
4,029
s
491
MUP-13
MUP-13
Multi Use Path
228TH ST SW
SR 99 to city limits
1,395
50
MUP-14
MUP-14
Multi Use Path
SR 104
Sunset Ave to 100th Ave W
5,053 0
51
MUP-15
MUP-15
Multi Use Path
SR 104
100th Ave W to 244th St Sw
9,974 ca
52
NM-03
NM-03
Roadway
84TH AVE W
Esperance & City Limits divide to 238th St SW
1,154 Q
SR-99 Revitalization Project (from 244th St. SW to 238th St.
M
53
R-03
R-03
Roadway
SW) Stage 3 (out of total of 9 Stages along Hwy 99)
244th St. SW to 238th St. SW
2,700 to
d
SR-99 Revitalization Project from 224th St. SW to 220th St. SW
+r
54
R-04
R-04
1,988
Roadway
Stage 4 (out of total of 9 Stages of Hwy 99)
224th St. SW to 220th St. SW
0
SR-99 Revitalization Project from 216th St. SW to 212th St. SW
d
55
R-OS
R-OS
2,106
Roadway
Stage 5 (out of total of 9 Stages along Hwy 99)
216th St. SW to 212th St. SW
C
228th St. SW Corridor improvements from Hwy. 99 to 95th PI.
.,
56
R-02
R-02
5,559
Roadway
W
SR 99 to 95th PI. W
57
R-07
R-07
Roadway
SR-99 Revitalization Project from 234th to 228th St
234th to 228th St
2,200 0
Q
58
R-08
R-08
Roadway
SR-99 Revitalization Project from 224th to 228th St
224th to 228th St
1,468 =
SR-99 Revitalization Project from 216st St SW to 500' north of
59
R-09
R-09
Roadway
220th St SW
216st St SW to 500' north of 220th St SW
943
60
SW-01
SW-01
Sidewalk
N MEADOWDALE RD
164th St SW to 68th Ave W
812
M
61
SW-02
SW-02
Sidewalk
MEADOWDALE BEACH RD
75th PI W to Olympic View Dr
3,893 =
62
SW-03
SW-03
Sidewalk
80TH AVE W
188th St SW to Olympic View Drive
3,036 C
63
SW-04
I SW-04
Sidewalk
OLYMPIC AVE
Olympic View Drive to Puget Drive
730 N
64
SW-05
SW-05
Sidewalk
MAPLEWOOD DR
Main Street to 200th St SW
2,673 d
65
SW-06
SW-06
Sidewalk
88TH AVE W
200th St SW to 196th St SW
IX
1,268
66
SW-08
SW-08
Sidewalk
82ND AVE W / 208th St SW
83rd Ave W to 206th St SW
882 y
67
SW-09
SW-09
Sidewalk
80TH AVE W
212th St SW to 206th St SW
1,972 J
r
68
SW-11
SW-11
Sidewalk
80TH AVE W
220th St SW to 218th St SW
671 v
691
SW-12
I SW-12
Sidewalk
95TH PL W
224th St SW to 220th St SW
1,357 0
70
SW-14
SW-14
Sidewalk
ROBIN HOOD DR
106th Ave W to existing sidewalk at Hickman Park
1,488 d
71
SW-15
SW-15
Sidewalk
232ND ST SW
100th Ave W to SR 104
2,925 d
72
SW-16
SW-16
Sidewalk
100TH AVE W
238th St SW to 242nd PI SW
674 An
73
SW-17
SW-17
Sidewalk
97TH AVE W
239th St Sw to 240th St SW
662 d
74
SW-19
SW-19
Sidewalk
96TH PL W
239th St Sw to 234th St SW
1,970 IX
75
SW-20
SW-20
Sidewalk
234TH ST SW
97th Ave W to 94th Ave W
2,898 M
76
SW-21
SW-21
Sidewalk
236TH ST SW
94th Ave W to 84th Ave W
2,088 =
77
SW-22
SW-22
Sidewalk
234TH ST SW
84th Ave W to existing sidewalk by 82nd PI W
411 d
E
78
SW-23
SW-23
Sidewalk
234TH ST SW
234th ST SW to 76th Ave W
1,604
79
SW-24
SW-24
Sidewalk
78TH AVE W
234th St SW to 236th ST SW
669 ca
w
80
SW-25
SW-25
Sidewalk
236TH ST SW
SR 99 to 76th Ave W
1,524 Q
811
SW-26
I SW-26
Sidewalk
230TH ST SW / 75th PI W
76th Ave W to City Limits (74th Ave W)
1,137 ;
82
SW-27
SW-27
Sidewalk
240TH ST SW / 78th Ave W
SR 99 to 236th St SW
2,991 Q
d
83
SW-30
SW-30
Sidewalk
236TH ST SW
84th Ave W to SR 104
983 E
84
SW-32
SW-32
Sidewalk
PINE ST
SR 104 to 9th Ave 5
4,017 v
Main St. to 3rd Ave. N (from Downtown retail to Edmonds Center for
41
85
SW-32
SW-32
41
Sidewalk
14th Ave. Corridor Enhancements Walkway
I the Arts)
Packet Pg. 36
2.2.c
No.
Project ID
new ProjectlD
Project Type
Street Name
Extents Shape_Length (Fe(
Existing southern trail terminus (Mathay-Ballinger Park) to City limits
86
Trail-02
Trail-02
IINTERURBAN
Trail
TRAIL Feasibility Study
/ connecting to City of Shoreline
87
BL-18
BL-18
I Bike Lanes
1224th St SW
76th Avenue W to Interuban Trail
88
R-01
R-01
I Roadway
184th Ave W
220th St SW to 238th St SW (in Esperance)
Packet Pg. 37