The URL can be used to link to this page

2024-12-09 Architectural Design Board PacketAgenda Edmonds Architectural Design Board SPECIAL MEETING BRACKETT ROOM 121 5TH AVE N, CITY HALL - 3RD FLOOR, EDMONDS, WA 98020 DECEMBER 9, 2024, 6:00 PM MEETING INFORMATION This is a Hybrid special meeting. Attendees may appear in person at 121 5th Avenue N, 3rd Floor, Brackett Room or on-line via the zoom link provided. Join Zoom Meeting at: https://edmondswa- gov.zoom. us/j/88959586932?pwd=Rzd P W U IwM09PZ1k1 M H N 2eW M 1YXphZz09 Meeting ID: 889 5958 6932 Password: 591531 Call into the meeting by dialing: 253-205-0468 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. Previous Meeting Minutes 4. AUDIENCE COMMENTS 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Design Review - PLN2023-0071 222 3rd Ave. S B. Cascara Townhouses 6. NEW BUSINESS 7. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 8. CHAIR COMMENTS 9. MEMBER COMMENTS 10. ADJOURNMENT Edmonds Architectural Design Board Agenda December 9, 2024 Page 1 Architectural Design Board Agenda Item Meeting Date: 12/9/2024 Previous Meeting Minutes Staff Lead: Mike Clugston Department: Planning & Development Prepared By: Michelle Martin Background/History N/A Staff Recommendation Review and approve edits from October 24th meeting. Narrative Edited meeting draft attached. Attachments: ADB 10242024 draft - edited Packet Pg. 2 CITY OF EDMONDS ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN BOARD Minutes of Webinar Meeting October 24, 2024 Chair Bayer called the meeting of the Architectural Design Board to order at 6:03 p.m., in the Brackett Room at the City Council Chambers, 250 - 5' Avenue North, Edmonds, Washington. N Board Members Present Board Members Absent Staff Present Kim Bayer, Chair Alex Hutchinson Tristan Sewell, Planner Alexa Brooks, Vice Chair Steve Schmitz Brad Shipley, Senior Planner Maurine Jeude Mike Clugston, Planning Manager c Corbitt Loch Shane Hope, Interim Director, Planning & Todd Stine (online) Development Department N 7 O d i APPROVAL OF AGENDA a The agenda was approved as presented. AUDIENCE COMMENTS: None. M 9 W we) WLyJ i 1_0IIJ�y VICE CHAIR BROOKS MOVED THAT THE MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 26, 2024 BE APPROVED AS PRESENTED. BOARD MEMBER JEUDE SECONDED THE MOTION, WHICH CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. NEW BUSINESS A. BLD2024-0979 Edmonds Swedish Signage Design Review Planner Tristan Sewell presented Edmonds Swedish Signage Design Review. This permit application was for a sign package to redo the signage at the Langer Building at the Swedish Edmonds Campus. It's a sign package of four new signs, one building ID, and three monument signs around the perimeter, one at basically each street entrance or curb cut, so there's one at the corner of Highway 99 and 216th. The modification of the request is just the number of signs. Under code, there would be permitted one per street, so one on 216th, one on Highway 99, or one at the corner, not both. They're asking for both. Everything else about it is compliant and fits within the design criteria applicable to the CG zone. Architectural Design Board Meeting Minutes of Virtual Meeting October 24, 2024 Pagel of 8 Packet Pg. 3 ADB reviews any sign application that requests modification to the standards of Chapter 20.60 ECDC. They can only approve requests that arrive from one of these two situations. It's a unique site with unique needs and a configuration in the context of a larger campus. It's in Highway 99 medical activity center. This is where the urgent care clinic is housed, along with some other various services. The expressed concern from the applicant in the request was regarding legibility and navigation on site by patients and visitors requiring urgent care and emergency care, and being able to accurately navigate the site in those kinds of need. That is the reason for the request for three signs rather than the normally allowed two signs. ADB may only approve the request if it meets both of these criteria. The design of the signage itself is compatible with the materials, colors, design, and proportions of development throughout the site and in the vicinity, and that the modification is not more than 50 percent of what would normally be allowed. The one proposed is on the corner, indicating the direction of the various facilities needed. The building ID is on the east face of the building. That one's separate and not contained within the request. There is a pair of monument signs, one on 216th and one on Highway 99. Chair Bayer asked if it will say Langer Building, which was confirmed by Mr. Sewell. This modification is limited to 50 percent. Regarding compliance, it was discussed about the larger campus context and the navigability concerns and needs for urgent or emergent scenarios. The proposed signage is consistent with their larger branding and on -site design schedule. This is an update to bring it in alignment with that. So based on the analysis of the code, the conclusions, and the attachments provided in the staff report, staff recommends that ADB approve the modifications proposed by the applicant because they're compatible materials, designs, and they comply with that 50 percent maximum. Board Member Loch asked regarding the calculation of the sign area if the calculation included the entire sign structure versus just the area where there's text. Mr. Sewell stated it was just the area where there's text per code. These qualify as monument signs, a type of freestanding sign. The sign area is just the area taken up by copy. Board Member Loch questioned the allowable size of the sign, and Mr. Sewell confirmed that they are well within their design maximums, and that everything is to spec. Board Member Loch also stated the two smaller monument signs have plaques for additional signage, so would the applicant have to come in for a permit to put additional text in those lower lines? Planner Sewell stated sign modifications to change the copy on the sign doesn't require a permit. Board Member Stine asked if that would include the blanks in his area calculation. Mr. Sewell confirmed it did. Vice Chair Brooks commented that they had a recent family visit to the emergency room, and so additional signs would've been helpful, and this was just two weeks ago. Chair Bayer confirmed having a similar situation and asked about the Langer Building. Lisa Edwards, Public Hospital District No. 2, was present, and stated that the Langer Building is currently known as the Kruger Clinic. Public Hospital District No. 2 own the whole campus. They own the hospital, and they lease it to Swedish. So they are renaming the Kruger clinic after Frederick P. Langer, a long-time commissioner, who passed away in 2022 after battling cancer. Chair Bayer asked if it was where the Kruger Clinic is currently housed. Ms. Edwards confirmed. Ms. Edwards stated there would be a naming ceremony next year. Board Member Stine reiterated that additional signs would have been appreciated for a recent visit that he had to urgent care. Regarding the proposed signs, he asked if they really wanted traffic going to the hospital going through the parking lot, as opposed to going up to 216th. Ms. Edwards stated that their goal with this sign package is to emphasize urgent care. Emergency department is oversubscribed, and it's an average of five to seven hours per visit. They are looking to emphasize urgent care access because it's underutilized. Board Member Stine stated that it seems like the more direct access to the hospital would be to use 216th rather than going through the parking lot. Ms. Edwards stated it would, but Architectural Design Board Meeting Minutes of Virtual Meeting October 24, 2024 Page 2 of 8 Packet Pg. 4 they find that people come from all different directions, especially when they're upset and trying to get to care, so the intent was to ensure if someone accidentally came through this way, they could still get to the hospital. BOARD MEMBER JEUDE MOVED TO ACCEPT THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION AS PRESENTED AND TO APPROVE THE PROPOSAL. VICE CHAIR BROOKS SECONDED THE MOTION. THE VOTE WAS UNANIMOUS, AND THE MOTION PASSED. B. Streamline Design Review and Middle Housing Next new business was the Design Review and Middle Housing presented by Senior Planner Brad Shipley. Under HB 1293, there are to be clear and objective design standards and changes to how any public meetings are held for design review. Streamline design review: any design guidelines have to be clear and objective. They have to have at least one ascertainable criterion by which an applicant can determine whether a given design is going to meet the criteria. Regarding middle housing types, they can't use design standards to make certain housing types unfeasible. You can't reduce it to a point where they can't get built. HB 1293 came about as a response from the builder community, who believed the process to get approval was too long and too subjective. So be clear and objective. Mr. Shipley gave the example of building entry location. Commercial building entries should be easily recognized oriented to the pedestrian's streetscape by being located at the sidewalk. Board Member Loch asked what are the characteristics of a commercial building? It's easily recognizable, but that's a very subjective statement. So that part is not clear and objective. Board Member Stine agreed with that statement. The first part is subjective, the last part is objective. Mr. Shipley stated the use of the phrase "should be" should be replaced, perhaps with "shall." Mr. Shipley also gave the example of weather protection. Provide a covered walkway for pedestrians traveling along public sidewalks or walkways. Chair Bayer stated the only thing she sees subjective would be what would apply to a covered walkway. Vice Chair Brooks added or the distance, also. Board Member Stine stated that it doesn't necessarily talk about the entire street frontage or the extent of the coverage that's required, but other than that, it seems fairly objective. Mr. Shipley stated that they could probably get a little more specific about how much coverage would be there. But generally speaking, it could be uniformly applied and most people reading this are going to understand what it means. Mr. Shipley then gave the example of building facade. Provide a human -scale streetscape, breaking up long facades into defined forms that continue a pattern of individual and distinct tenant spaces. Commercial and mixed -use areas. Avoid blank, monotonous, and imposing building facades using design elements that add detail and emphasize the different levels of building. Chair Bayer stated that this came in handy on two projects, but felt that it was very convoluted. Board Member Stine also believed it to be very subjective. Board Member Loch stated that it is well-intentioned, but it doesn't provide enough clarity for the applicant. Mr. Shipley believed that it is mainly objective in that it's talking about specific design criteria for building facades. But it's kind of hard to do sometimes without some subjective interpretations such as human scale and what measurable elements there are. All of those things really aren't defined here, so would still want to revise this. Board Member Jeude asked about the word avoid. Mr. Shipley stated there are several ways to clean this one up. Board Member Loch suggested striking the word imposing. Mr. Shipley discussed these are going to be the types of things that will need to be dialed in as they start looking at design criteria moving forward. Chair Bayer stated that they had actually done this exercise one time before. They did go through and wordsmith some of this. Mr. Shipley believed that would be a good starting point and as he starts to get into some of these changes, he Architectural Design Board Meeting Minutes of Virtual Meeting October 24, 2024 Page 3 of 8 Packet Pg. 5 will go through what was previously done and see what he could incorporate and bring it back to make sure they get it right. And then also help identify what might be missing as we go through. Chair Bayer stated that Board Member Stine's participation would be great. Mr. Shipley also brought up another example. A building should appear as an assemblage of smaller forms, not one large mass. The word should again starts to get into subjectivity. So for the objective, all buildings shall articulate individual units or clusters of units to appear as smaller forms through varied footprints, heights, setbacks, roof forms, materials, and/or colors. There's still a lot to play with there, and a lot to determine whether they're meeting that criteria, but it really points to some specific things. That's a pretty clear measurement when you're looking at two different things to tell which one is smaller form. He was hoping that maybe this would kind of restimulate some of the conversation about where they want to go and what they're considering as they're looking at the role of ADB, what they would find valuable for your time in terms of being there and donating their time. The other point of HB 1293 is that it can't be more than one public meeting, which gets rid of the iterative process. This is really the extent of most of the changes that would take place. So this process here is kind of where our existing process is. So in the first row, there are different types of design review, some projects are just exempt. Those include single families, ADUs, duplexes, those are all currently exempt. When you go into triplexes and fourplexes, c nonresidential uses, residential use of five or more, these are mostly SEPA triggers. Then you get different types of design review, such as middle housing types. There are some that can be five -plus units. Mr. Shipley wasn't sure if they would allow those, but if allowed, they would be exempt unless it was decided to have design review for all of these, rn including single-family homes. c d So when the development code is developed for these, they're going to be talking about the development code a little bit a differently. Now you go into the zone, and you look up the zone, and it tells you everything that you could do on that single-family lot. It's setbacks, height, and things such as that. But when you start talking about different design or different building types that are allowed, if you want to make sure that they're all encouraged in some sort of way, or you maybe want to encourage a certain type a little more than the other, then you have flexibility within the building code. L Chair Bayer asked about the timing of that. Mr. Shipley stated that they have a clear deadline, which is to have all adopted by July 1, 2025, otherwise they would have to go by the model code. They will have to do a phased approach to Iti c tackle the whole thing if they really want to have a development code that takes them into the next 70 years. They want v to pull all the pieces into one cohesive, unified code. o r Board Member Stine stated that with only one meeting with the board, it seems like there's more onus on the city staff, m a so he's curious with that one meeting, what would be most helpful to city staff so we do get the Edmonds that we desire? Chair Bayer asked if was referring to the public hearing, which Board Member Stine affirmed. He asked when is the timing of that in the review process and what would be most beneficial to the city staff because it seemed like the city t staff has a bigger burden to carry with only one pubic meeting. Mr. Shipley stated that he thinks that there's a lot of value that could be offered from the public, comments, and just diverse ways of looking at things. However, he's also a seen where things become too political, or it becomes something that is too subjective and leaves open to too much interpretation. Mr. Shipley stated that from a time standpoint, the most streamlined process is administrative review. But that removes ADB from that process which he finds valuable for certain types of project. The larger projects he thinks it's helpful to have that feedback and a chance for the public to actually come in and people to hear the voices. Board Member Loch stated that he thinks that deciding the process before they have the design guidelines is backwards. The quality of the design guidelines will help inform the decision of who should decide what and when and public input. So he would be hesitant to answer the question now. Chair Bayer stated that she would be hesitant to eliminate ADB's involvement, and she added that they need dedicated, committed professionals that can step in and participate. Architectural Design Board Meeting Minutes of Virtual Meeting October 24, 2024 Page 4 of 8 Packet Pg. 6 Board Member Loch would like to make sure that they consider where the design guidelines apply. He feels they are living with legacy rules that were originally designed protect the downtown area. He thinks it would be odd to say this emphasis on design isn't relevant elsewhere in the city, especially because the buildings are bigger, so he'd like to look at that, as well. Mr. Shipley agreed that they have a lot of legacy items that exist within the comprehensive plan, and it only gets changed once every 10 years. So far, they are on maybe the third iteration of the comp plan, but that's almost 30 years ago. The development code really hasn't changed that much. But it's gotten more difficult because it's been patchwork, and it hasn't been taken collectively and looked at and created a new framework for how it could be done. All the same things could be accomplished but put it in a framework that actually makes sense. He discussed the history of the downtown waterfront, Vision 2020, and activity centers. Now, they're talking about neighborhood centers and hubs and other things in this comp plan. There is a change to do maybe overlays within the zoning code for specific areas or specific guidelines. Chair Bayer asked if he is looking for the board's input on this. Mr. Shipley stated the only decision that they've discussed is perhaps not having a single phase at all, but it doesn't have to be a single phase. It could be administrative review or some other process, so that's a decision to make whether you want a single phase or not. And then the ones that are exempt, he's pretty confident that c no one's going to want to do design review on single family homes, so we're not going to apply it to middle housing. a� Chair Bayer stated she asked because there have been a discussion about having a design review of the commercial zone. Mr. Shipley stated when this subarea plan was development, they moved nonresidential uses or any residential use that c had five or more units to administrative design review. They did make changes to how the administrative design review goes and he thinks if its over 55 feet, it would require a notice to the neighborhood and a pre -development meeting that a the developer hosts. And then it'd still be a staff administrative design review through that process, and then everything else is a Type 1 administrative design review. °' Board Member Jeude was curious about the single phase. After applicants have brought their designs to ADB, and ADB has things they'd like to see, and then that's the end of it. Then they can decide to do it, or they can decide not to do it. Mr. Shipley stated they could also appeal the process. Planning Manager Clugston stated that if ADB remains the decision maker then they'd issue a decision. They'd say it's approved with these conditions that you have to meet or it's denied and then you have to start again. But that assumes that ADB wants to continue to be the decision maker on the bulk of these design review projects like it has been in the past. But they've also talked about trying to get the board involved earlier in the process because later in the process you go, the more checklist it is. Or maybe staff does the bulk of design reviews if they have clear and objective standards that can be applied with the checklist. But if somebody wants to be innovative and try something different, they can go to the ADB for an exception and ask for some sort of design waiver. Chair Bayer believes it is hard unless they can see what these clear and objective excellent design standards are. Mr. Shipley stated they would be drafting all the design standards before they adopt any new process, so they would have time to discuss what those design standards look like before any decisions are made, as long as they are able to meet their deadline. Vice Chair Brooks asked for the different types to be explained. Mr. Shipley stated that Type 1 is just administrative design review, doesn't require notice. Type 2A is staff design review, but it does have notice. Type 3A is ADB public notice. Chair Bayer discussed how this has been an unusual and difficult year for the ADB. Vice Chair Brooks concurred that it hasn't felt like much has happened in the three years she has been on the board. Chair Bayer concurred that the board could be a lot more high functioning. Board Member Loch agreed that that when it was, they actually achieved some pretty good things in their projects. Architectural Design Board Meeting Minutes of Virtual Meeting October 24, 2024 Page 5 of 8 Packet Pg. 7 Director Shane Hope then joined the conversation and confirmed that Mike Clugston is now the planning manager. Board Member Loch asked that since July'25 is not very far away, that they have a month -by -month schedule work plan and that it would include the decision points that need to be made as its decided which paths to take to get to the finish line, whether it's the location, the process, the standards, what are built-in standards into the development code. Ms. Hope states they've had to have a very aggressive schedule to get through the comprehensive plan update, still expecting to get it done before the end of the year and that required a very tight calendar. So they will work up something similar for the code updates. Planner Shipley stated that he's been pulling together a lot of the pieces that will be needed, and he expects in the next week or so that they're going to at least have the draft of a plan for them to look at about when those dates and decision points will be. Chair Bayer advised Ms. Hope that the idea was brought up about just trying to connect a little more with the planning board. In the past, they've had joint meetings on special topics that related to the ADB. They talked about trying to hold something in January, so they weren't just working in a vacuum. It would be the planning board and even city council. Does she see a benefit in that or would that just complicate things? Ms. Hope stated that she could see that could be useful, as long as it's figured out in advance what are the touch points and the topics. Board Member Loch wanted to know what others think about this board and its role and its future. Board Member Stine stated he was looking at the Title 16 and Title 22 community development code and there's design standards that are already embedded in there. He'd like to better understand how the design standards that are in the code relate to the design guidelines that are part of the comprehensive plan because it looks like there's some overlap or maybe even c contradictions possibly. a Ms. Hope stated that comprehensive plan isn't really where design standards should live. People use the term standards and guidelines sometimes to mean something different and sometimes to mean the same thing. Most often people think of standards as being explicit things, not guidance, like, encourage something. Think of standards as being the rules, but some jurisdictions use it either way. But in the comprehensive plan, it's not generally the place for things to guide day by day development projects. The comp plan normally should be for kind of general policy direction and then the codes L and standards and so on are set up. The comp draft plan now says that until new regulations are adopted, those ones would stay in effect that are in the comp plan. But then going forward, they'll have things that are in the code like they c should be and that's easier for applicants as well as for people that are reviewing it. v Mr. Shipley asked how comfortable everybody felt with middle housing. He could talk about maybe some of the thoughts that they could consider and different points that are going to be important in terms of design characteristics. Chair Bayer asked him to explain about middle housing. Mr. Shipley stated that prior to 1940, most communities were built with a full range of housing types prior to zoning codes. Now, when zoning came about, it did away with all of those, and there were single family, and mid -rise or larger apartments. Sometimes, you'll have townhomes or a few others, but really those have made up such a small amount of the overall housing options that are provided that it then became to be termed missing, that it had disappeared, and it was all by design to some extent that they were made illegal to build. Even today, up until those changes have to be made, 75 percent of Edmonds is zoned for one building type. So when you hear missing middle, middle housing is just same thing, all of this. Through HB 1110, all of these building types are defined and have to be accommodate, except for live/work. Live/work is the only one that's not included, though it could be included, but is not a requirement. So there's a range of different homes here. Tier 2 cities are required to accommodate up to four units on all residentially zoned parcels. As far as the bill is written, if you're within a quarter mile of what they call a major transit stop, you have to allow four by right. And if you're further away than that, you allow two by right and then four as an incentive for providing one unit of affordable housing. That has to be affordable to a household making 60 percent of area median income if it's for rent or 80 percent of the area median income if it is for sale. But the affordable piece actually makes it so it probably won't be developed with that building type. Because it's too cumbersome, not only for the person who Architectural Design Board Meeting Minutes of Virtual Meeting October 24, 2024 Page 6 of 8 Packet Pg. 8 owns it, has to comply every year for the next 50 years, but for the city to actually process and continue to process individual homeowners and managing individual homeowners that change over time on compliance every single year of turning in income documentation and rental documentation. Now, you could have nothing but single families and duplexes and ADUs, and that could be the future. Or they could include such things as the cottage port or courtyard buildings. Chair Bayer asked what constituted family housing. The Citizen Housing Commission had recommendations they brought the city council and the multifamily design standards were adopted. She wondered if multifamily term was still being used or if it's now being referred to as middle housing. Mr. Shipley stated his belief that they're going to start talking more about building types versus single family and multifamily. Mr. Shipley discussed how the scale of single family homes has evolved over the years, from 1,400 square feet in the '70s to now probably 2,800 square feet. Chair Bayer asked if the live/work arrangement could be written into the code that it not be allowed. Mr. Shipley stated that live/work is not one of the ones of middle housing that has to be included. It's not as important as it used to be because a lot of people live and work from home these days. 2 Typically, the footprint is going to be about 40 to 60 feet in width on an average lot, kind of 75 foot lot frontage to the c street. Off-street parking space is often shared and often in these kind of developments, you have smaller family types, so it doesn't necessarily require the full amount of parking that has always been allocated towards or required for single family homes that are typically much larger, old larger families. But its important to consider how parking is provided. rn But whatever they adopt for multifamily, they'll also have to adopt for single family, so that's where a lot of this nuance c is going to come into play. Open spaces is typically always shared. That could be provided in many different ways. Stoops, galleys, different ways of the building facing the street and addressing the street, and those could be included. a. There's potential for tailoring the development codes in this kind of way if it's desired. a Board Member Stine referred to the Washington Department of Commerce website, and they've got a whole page about middle housing as well as tool kits for developing objective standards. So seems like some of this work may already be out there. Mr. Shipley stated that they're trying to do a lot of the research and heavy lifting because they know that most city staffs didn't have the staff to do that work or the budgets. Board Member Loch discussed garden -style apartments. Mr. Shipley stated that it doesn't sound like a middle housing type, so he didn't believe it to be a top priority, but that can be discussed, especially as they're looking at developing new zoning districts. Chair Bayer reiterated that until the design standards are figured out, it's hard to talk about the process. She asked if Mr. Shipley could email them what is discussed for those who would like to wordsmith it. She also asked if they foresaw a project coming their way in the November meeting. Mr. Clugston wanted to touch on the draft comprehensive element for design view. After all was said and done, the existing language in the current comp plan 2020 version is being carried forward in the new comp plan. So we'll get to edit that in the future, but at least it didn't vanish entirely as had been proposed at one point. So they'll work on that in the future for sure. So right now for upcoming meetings, the November meeting is on Thanksgiving and the December meeting is on day after Christmas, so those meetings are going to be canceled. A special meeting is already scheduled for December 9th to make up for those. And they should have at least one, possibly two projects to review at that meeting. He stated that given the condensed timeline, he imagines that they'll be having some additional special meetings. The planning board has had a meeting every week this month. He hopes it doesn't get to that extent. So as they develop the work plan, he and Brad will flesh out over the next couple of weeks. At that point, they'll see when and where they may need additional meetings and will get as much warning as possible and get those scheduled. An additional special meeting could be possible, maybe another time in November. Architectural Design Board Meeting Minutes of Virtual Meeting October 24, 2024 Page 7 of 8 Packet Pg. 9 PUBLIC HEARING: None. ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN BOARD MEMBER COMMENTS: None. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 7:53 p.m. Architectural Design Board Meeting Minutes of Virtual Meeting October 24, 2024 Pages of 8 Packet Pg. 10 L N O N IV N O r m Q C N E t V R r+ a� Q Architectural Design Board Agenda Item Meeting Date: 12/9/2024 Design Review - PLN2023-0071 222 3rd Ave. S Staff Lead: Tristan Sewell Department: Planning & Development Prepared By: Tristan Sewell Background/History The proposal is for design review of a five -unit townhouse infill project with related site, landscaping, and frontage improvements. An existing house and appurtenances will be removed. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that the ADB approve the project design in File PLN2023-0071 with the following conditions: 1. The site plans submitted in application for the subsequent building permit(s) shall demonstrate compliance with Chapter 17.115 Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure, Chapter 17.120 Bicycle Parking Facilities, and Title 18 Public Works Requirements. 2. All plantings must meet the sizing requirements found in Section 20.13.015 ECDC Plant Schedule. A performance and maintenance bond will be required per ECDC 20.13.040. 3. Significant trees that are removed must be replaced in accordance with ECDC 23.10.080. Narrative ECDC 20.10.010(C) subjects this proposal to general design review as described in Chapter 20.11 ECDC. Because the applicant proposed five dwelling units, the project is not exempt from the State Environmental Policy Act (WAC 197-11-800(1)(b)(ii). Therefore, the Architectural Design Board conducts a Type III -A review and issues a decision on the project following a public hearing (ECDC 20.11.010(A). The staff report and fifteen attachments are included in the packet. Attachments: PLN2023-0071 Staff Report w. attachments Packet Pg. 11 CITY OF EDMONDS 121 51h Avenue North, Edmonds, WA 98020 Phone: 425.771.0220 • Fax: 425.771.0221 • Web: www.edmondswa.gov PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • PLANNING DIVISION "nc. 10" PLANNING DIVISION REPORT & RECOMMENDATION TO THE ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN BOARD Project: File Number: Date of Report: Staff Contact: Proposal: Edmonds 222 Townhouses PLN2023-0071 December 3, 2024 Tristan Sewell, Planner Application for Design Review of a new 5-unit townhouse development at 222 3rd Ave. S, within the Multifamily Residential (RM-1.5) zone. I. SUMMARY OF PROPOSED ACTION The proposal is for design review of a five -unit townhouse infill project with related site, landscaping, and frontage improvements. An existing house and appurtenances will be removed II. GENERAL INFORMATION 1. Owner: Augustus Bukowski 2. Applicant: Jacob Young 3. Tax Parcel Number(s): 27032300409500 4. Location: 222 3rd Ave. S 5. Zoning: Multifamily Residential (RM-1.5) 6. Existing Use: Single-family residence 7. Proposed Use: Multifamily residential and associated parking III. Review Process ECDC 20.10.010(C subjects this proposal to general design review as described in Chapter 20.11 ECDC. Because the applicant proposed five dwelling units, the project is not exempt from the State Environmental Policy Act (WAC 197-11-800(1)(b)(ii)). Therefore, the Architectural Design Board (ADB) conducts a Type III -A review and issues a decision on the project following a public hearing (ECDC 20.11.010(A)). This staff report contains staff's Page 1 of 15 Packet Pg. 12 File No. PLN2023-0071 Administrative Design Review Edmonds 222 Townhomes recommendation to ADB on whether the proposal meets the general design review criteria of ECDC 20.11.030, Chapter 20.13 ECDC (landscaping requirements), and the Community Culture and Urban Design element of the 2020 Comprehensive Plan. IV. APPLICATION MATERIALS Staff determined the application to be complete on July 23, 2024 (ECDC 20.02.003). Staff then issued the notice of application on August 2, 2024, as prescribed by ECDC 20.02.003. V. SEPA THRESHOLD DETERMINATION Per ECDC 20.11.010(A), the Architectural Design Board reviews projects subject to a SEPA threshold determination. WAC 197-11-800(1)(b)(i) requires a threshold determination for multifamily residential development of more than four dwelling units. Staff issued a Determination of Non -Significance (DNS) on November 26, 2024 (Attachment 15). VI. PUBLIC NOTICE & COMMENTS As stated above, staff issued the notice of application per Section 20.03.002 ECDC on August 2, 2024, with a comment period closing at 4:30 pm on August 16, 2024. Staff received seven comments, included unabridged as Attachment 13. Not all comments addressed the design review criteria of ECDC 20.11.030. Comments relevant to design review questioned the necessity of the cherry tree's removal and the amount of pavement proposed, expressed concern over the outdoor lighting plan's impact on neighboring properties, and both supported and critiqued the proposed architectural a design. Commenters voiced concern over the potential glare from the siding and windows, 3 the design standing out in the vicinity, the choice of two separate buildings over a single building, and tree planting choices in the required landscaping. a Some comments addressed topics subject to review in subsequent permit applications, such as traffic impacts, mechanical equipment, utilities and emergency access, setback compliance, and building height. Staff reviewed the proposed height and setbacks, which comply with the zoning code. Engineering provided a Memorandum of Compliance on the preliminary plans (Attachment 9). The ADB hearing will be held in a hybrid format — on Zoom and in the Brackett Room at City Hall — at 6 PM on December 9, 2024: https://edmondswa- gov.zoom.us/j/88959586932?pwd=RzdPWUlwM09PZ1 k1 MHN2eWM1YXphZz09 Passcode: 591531 or by phone at 253 205 0468 Prior to the Architectural Design Board's public hearing, staff issued a notice of public hearing pursuant to Section 20.03.003 ECDC. This notice went to commenters on the notice of application and property owners within 300', posted this notice onsite, in the Pa Packet Pg. 13 File No. PLN2023-0071 Administrative Design Review Edmonds 222 Townhomes Planning & Development lobby, the Public Safety Complex foyer, and on the City's website, and published it in The Everett Herald on November 22, 2024. VII. TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE The City of Edmonds' Building and Engineering staff, Snohomish County Fire District No. 1, and Sound Disposal account manager also reviewed and evaluated this application. Building had no specific comments for the design review application, reserving comments for any associated building permit applications. South County Fire communicated applicable preliminary fire code comments, including fire lane width (Attachment 10). Engineering provided a Memorandum of Compliance (Attachment 9) indicating the proposal appears consistent with ECDC Title 18 and Engineering standards and that a more detailed review will occur as part of the building permit review process. Vill. NATURAL ENVIRONMENT Topography: The site descends approximately fifteen feet from 3 d Ave. S to the western property boundary, whereat the terrain slopes more severely down to the neighboring lot. Soils: According to the Soil Survey of Snohomish County Area, Washington, the subject site exhibits Alderwood Urban land complex, 2-8% slopes on the western portion of the lot and Kitsap silt loam, 0-8% slopes on the eastern portion. Critical Areas: The City conducted a critical area determination in 2022 under file number w CRA2022-0130. Staff identified potential erosion hazards onsite. c a� E IX. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS �a �a The vicinity primarily includes multifamily residential, mixed use, and public facilities 3 development. This lot's present use as a single-family residence stands out, as only one other lot is developed as such in the vicinity, per County data. The lot backs up against the n City's wastewater treatment plant and its associated facilities, motivating Type landscaping for screening along the western property boundary. X. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The 2020 Comprehensive Plan designates this site Multifamily— High Density and within the Downtown -Waterfront Activity Center. Excerpts from the Comprehensive Plan follow below, and specific criteria can be found in the Urban Design: General Objectives section of the Comprehensive Plan. The excerpted segments are those applicable to this application. Design Objectives for Site Design. The development of parking lots, pedestrian walkways and landscaping features is an integral part of how a building interacts with its site and its surrounding environment. Good design and site planning improves access by pedestrians, bicycles and automobiles, minimizes potential negative impacts to adjacent development, reinforces the character and activities within a district and builds a more cohesive and coherent physical environment. Pa Packet Pg. 14 File No. PLN2023-0071 Administrative Design Review Edmonds 222 Townhomes A.1 Vehicular Access. Reduce the numbers and width of driveways (curb cuts) in order to improve pedestrian, bicycle and auto safety. A.2 Layout of Parking. Locating buildings in proximity to the street to facilitate direct pedestrian access and help define the street edge. Parking should be placed to the side and rear. A.3 Connections On- and Offsite. Design site access and circulation within and between sites to encourage linkages for pedestrians, vehicles, and bicycles. Special attention should be paid to providing and improving connections to transit. A.4 Building Entry Location. Building entries should be configured to provide clear entry points to buildings, be oriented to pedestrian walkways/pathways, and support the overall intent of the streetscape environment. Space at the entry forgathering or seating is desirable for residential or mixed use buildings. A.5 Setbacks. Create and maintain the landscape and site characteristics of each neighborhood area and provide a common street frontage tieing each site to its neighbor. Setbacks should be appropriate to the desired streetscape, providing for transition areas between public streets and private building entries where a variety of activities and amenities can occur. A.6 Open Space. For residential settings, create green spaces to enhance the w visual attributes of the development and provide places for interaction, play, _ seating, and other activities. E s A.7 Building/Site Identity. Improve pedestrian access and way -finding by providing �a variety in building forms, colors, materials and individuality of buildings. A.8 Weather Protection. Provide covered walkways and entries for pedestrian weather protection. A.9 Lighting. Provide adequate and appropriate illumination in all areas used by automobiles, bicycles and pedestrians - including building entries, walkways, parking areas, circulation areas and other open spaces - to support activity and security. A.10 Signage. Encourage signage that provides clear information and direction for properties and businesses while preventing the streetscape from becoming cluttered. Encourage the use of graphics and symbols in signage to support the city's emphasis on uniqueness and the arts. A.11 Site Utilities, Storage, Trash and Mechanical Systems. Minimize the noise, odor and visual impacts of utility systems using such features as landscaping, building forms, or integrated design. A.12 Integrating Site Features. Integrate natural landscape features and unique landforms - such as rocky outcroppings or significant trees - into site design whenever possible. Pa Packet Pg. 15 File No. PLN2023-0071 Administrative Design Review Edmonds 222 Townhomes A.13 Landscape Buffers. Use landscaping and/or other features such as fences to maintain privacy and create a visual barrier between incompatible uses. These buffering techniques should also be used to soften hard edges (such as the perimeters of parking lots) and reinforce pedestrian ways and circulation routes. Native plants and rain gardens should be promoted as alternatives to lawns and runoff retention areas. Staff Analysis: Engineering's Memorandum of Compliance captures the preliminary review of vehicular access, parking, connectivity, and associated issues. Engineering will review further upon receipt of the application(s) for the necessary permit(s). The site development standards of Section 16.30.030 and landscaping requirements of Chapter 20.13 ensure that setbacks and open space are appropriately addressed - see the review of these topics elsewhere in this report. These requirements preclude the provision of covered walkways. Due to the small size of the lot, the lit pedestrian pathways to each unit's entrance, shared driveway, and addressing suffice for wayfinding. The applicant proposed no signage; any desired signage would be reviewed separately under a new permit application. Each townhome's garage acts as the primary utility, storage, and trash area. Design Objectives for Building Form. Building height and modulation guidelines are essential to create diversity in building forms, minimize shadows cast by taller buildings upon the pedestrian areas and to ensure compliance with policies in the city's Comprehensive Plan. Protecting views from public parks and building entries as well as street views to the mountains and Puget Sound are an important part of Edmonds character and urban form. r Q A.14 Building Form. Encourage new construction to avoid repetitive, monotonous s building forms. �a A.15 Massing. Reduce the apparent bulk and mass of buildings by encouraging human scale elements in building design and/or by subdividing building masses vertically or horizontally. A.16 Roof Modulation. Use roof forms to help identify different programs or functional areas within the building and support differentiation of building form and massing. Roof design, in combination with wall modulation, can allow for additional light to enter buildings or pedestrian spaces. A.17 Wall Modulation. Variation in materials, decorative elements, or other features should be employed to support pedestrian scale environments and streetscapes, or to help breakup large building masses to keep in scale with the surrounding environment. Staff Analysis: The proposed townhomes avoid monotonous design by breaking up the bulk with changes to texture, materials, glazing, and architectural features. The roof lines modulate, taking advantage of the pitched roof allowance of ECDC 16.30.030(A)(1) to provide greater variation. Pa Packet Pg. 16 File No. PLN2023-0071 Administrative Design Review Edmonds 222 Townhomes Design Objectives for Building Facade. Building facade objectives ensure that the exterior of a building- the portion of a building that defines the character and visual appearance of a place - is of high quality and demonstrates the strong sense of place and integrity valued by the residents of the City of Edmonds. A.18 Building Fagade Design. Encourage building fagades that reinforce the appearance and consistency of streetscape patterns while supporting diversity and identity in building design. A.19 Window Variety and Articulation. Use window size and placement to help define the scale and character of the building. Use the organization and combinations of window types to reinforce the streetscape character or to provide variation in a fagade, as well as provide light and air to the building interior. A.20 Variation in Facade Materials. Employ variation in materials, colors or design elements on building facades to help define the scale and style of the structure. Variation in fagade materials can help reduce the apparent bulk of larger buildings while allowing variety and individuality of building design. Staff Analysis: The fagade proposed aligns with the multifamily residential and mixed -used = a development context in the vicinity. The placement and size of the proposed windows y enables natural lighting for each residence and supports human -centric design that affirms o a sense of place. The mix of masonry, glazing, and panel siding establishes a unique style w r that helps minimize the apparent bulk of the building. _ a� E s Urban Design Goal B: Downtown/Waterfront Activity Center. Design objectives and standards should be carefully crafted for the Downtown/Waterfront Activity Center to encourage its unique design character and important place -making status within the city. 3 B.1 VehicularAccess and Parking. Driveways and curb cuts should be minimized to assure a consistent and safe streetscape for pedestrians. When alleys are present, these should be the preferred method of providing vehicular access to a property and should be used unless there is no reasonable alternative available. Configuration of parking should support a "park and walk" policy that provides adequate parking while minimizing impacts on the pedestrian streetscape. B.2 Pedestrian Access and Connections. Improve pedestrian access from the street by locating buildings close to the street and sidewalks, and defining the street edge. Cross walks at key intersections should be accentuated by the use of special materials, signage or paving treatments. Transit access and waiting areas should be provided where appropriate. B.3 Building Entry Location. Commercial building entries should be easily recognizable and oriented to the pedestrian streetscape by being located at sidewalkgrade. Pa Packet Pg. 17 File No. PLN2023-0071 Administrative Design Review Edmonds 222 Townhomes B.4 Building Setbacks. Create a common street frontage view with enough repetition to tie each site to its neighbor. Encourage the creation of public spaces to enhance the visual attributes of the development and encourage outdoor interaction. In the Waterfront area west of the railroad, buildings should be set back from the waterfront to preserve and provide a buffer from existing beach areas. In the Waterfront area, site layout should be coordinated with existing buildings and proposed improvements to provide views of the water, open spaces, and easy pedestrian access to the beach. B.5 Building/Site Identity. In the downtown area, retain a connection with the scale and character of downtown through the use of similar materials, proportions, forms, masses or building elements. Encourage new construction to use designs that reference, but do not replicate historic forms or patterns. B.6 Weather Protection. Provide a covered walkway for pedestrians traveling along public sidewalks or walkways. B.7 Signage. Lighting of signs should be indirect or minimally backlit to display lettering and symbols or graphic design instead of broadly lighting the face of the sign. Signage using graphics or symbols or that contributes to the historic character of a building should be encouraged. B.8 Art and Public Spaces. Public art and amenities such as mini parks, flower N 41 baskets, street furniture, etc., should be provided as a normal part of the r- public streetscape. Whenever possible, these elements should be continued E in the portion of the private streetscape that adjoins the public streetscape. In the 41 Avenue Arts Corridor, art should be a common element of building design, with greater design flexibility provided when art is made a central 3 feature of the design. B.9 Building Height. Create and preserve a human scale for downtown buildings Building frontages along downtown streetscapes should be pedestrian in scale. B.10 Massing. Large building masses should be subdivided or softened using design elements that emphasize the human scale of the streetscape. Building facades should respect and echo historic patterns along downtown pedestrian streets. B.11 Building Fagade. Provide a human scale streetscape, breaking up long facades into defined forms that continue a pattern of individual and distinct tenant spaces in commercial and mixed use areas. Avoid blank, monotonous and imposing building facades using design elements that add detail and emphasize the different levels of the building (e.g. the top or cornice vs. the pedestrian level or building base). Pa Packet Pg. 18 XI. File No. PLN2023-0071 Administrative Design Review Edmonds 222 Townhomes B.12 Window Variety and Articulation. In the downtown retail and mixed commercial districts, building storefronts should be dominated by clear, transparent glass windows that allow and encourage pedestrians to walk past and look into the commercial space. Decorative trim and surrounds should be encouraged to add interest and variety. Upper floors of buildings should use windows as part of the overall design to encourage rhythm and accents in the fagade. Staff Analysis: As discussed above, Engineering's Memorandum of Compliance captures the preliminary review of vehicular access, parking, connectivity, and associated issues. Engineering will review further, including any required frontage improvements, upon receipt of the application(s) for the necessary permit(s). Given that the proposal abides by the height limit, these residences fit in with the existing scale of downtown. The previous section addressed the building facade, massing, articulation, and windows. The applicant proposed no signage or public amenity spaces. As mentioned previously, the required setbacks preclude the development from providing a walkway covering along the sidewalk. APPLICABLE CODES ECDC 16.30 (RM — Multiple Residential Zone) Site Development Standards — RM-1.5: Minimum Minimum Minimum Maximum Maximum Street Side Rear Height Lot Setback Setback Setback Coverage 15' 10, 15' 25" 45% Staff Analysis: The proposed townhomes abide by the site development standards. Staff will reconfirm compliance in review of the subsequent building permit(s). Parking, Access, and Bicycle Storage Standards: The proposal provides vehicular access to the site along 3 d Ave. S via a shared driveway. The proposed design locates parking in pull -under garages for each unit. Each townhome has two bedrooms, requiring at least nine off-street parking spaces (ECDC 17.50.020(A)(1)(b)). Per ECDC 18.95.020(A)(1)(a), each parking space must be at least 8.5' wide by 16.5' long. Pursuant to ECDC 17.115.040(B), each dwelling unit must have at least one EV-Ready or better parking space. ECDC 17.120.040(A) requires 0.75 long-term bike storage spaces per dwelling unit. 40% of the provided storage spaces be "e-bike installed" —within five feet of an electrical outlet reserved for charging e-bikes (ECDC 17.120.010(F)). As such, the City requires four Long- term bike storage spaces, two of which must be within five feet of a power outlet. Long- term bicycle parking must comply with the requirements of ECDC 17.120.040(B). Subsection 17.120.030(A) ECDC requires two short-term bicycle parking for fewer than ten dwelling units. Roof only may extend five feet above the stated height limit if all portions of the roof above the stated height limit have a slope of four inches in 12 inches or greater. Pa Packet Pg. 19 File No. PLN2023-0071 Administrative Design Review Edmonds 222 Townhomes Staff Analysis: The applicant proposed ten parking spaces, satisfying the requirement of nine. The submitted plans presently lack the electric vehicle and bicycle parking required by Chapters 17.115 and 17.120 ECDC. Staff will verify compliance during building permit review; a condition is proposed. Minimum Required Parking Summary Number of Dwelling Units 5 Units' Bedroom Counts ALL 2-bed Parking Spaces Required per Unit 1.8 Total Required Parking Spaces 9 -Required EV-Ready Parking Spaces 1 per unit Long -Term Bike Parking per Unit 0.75 Required Short -Term Bike Parking 2* Required Long -Term Bike Parking 4* -Required eBike-Installed Parking 2* *All fractions rounded up ECDC 20.11- General Design Review ECDC 20.11.010 requires the ADB to review general design review applications that trigger review under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). The subject proposal required SEPA review due including more than four dwelling units (WAC 197-11-800(1)(b)(ii)). ECDC 20.11.030 lists the following required criteria for Building Design and Site Treatment. w r ECDC 20.11.030(A). Building Design. No one architectural style is required. The building shall be designed to comply with the purposes of this chapter and to avoid conflict with the s existing and planned character of the nearby area. All elements of building design shall form an integrated development, harmonious in scale, line and mass. The following are included as elements of building design: 1. All exterior building components, including windows, doors, eaves, and parapets; 2. Colors, which should avoid excessive brilliance or brightness except where that would enhance the character of the area; 3. Mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on the roof, grounds or buildings should be screened from view from the street level; 4. Long, massive, unbroken or monotonous buildings shall be avoided in order to comply with the purposes of this chapter and the design objectives of the comprehensive plan. This criterion is meant to describe the entire building. All elements of the design of a building including the massing, building forms, architectural details and finish materials contribute to whether or not a building is found to be long, massive, unbroken or monotonous. a. In multifamily (RM) or commercial zones, selections from among the following or similar features are appropriate for dealing with this criterion: Pa Packet Pg. 20 File No. PLN2023-0071 Administrative Design Review Edmonds 222 Townhomes i. Windows with architectural fenestration; ii. Multiple rooflines or forms; iii. Architecturally detailed entries; iv. Appropriate landscaping, v. The use of multiple materials; 5. All signs should conform to the general design theme of the development. Staff Analysis: All exterior building elements are harmonious with one another, presenting the overall building design as integrated and self -consistent. The mass of the building is subdivided vertically and horizontally by different materials and articulation. The buildings display a distinct top and bottom. Window variation, awnings, material changes, colors variation and roof form help to break up the buildings mass. The proposed colors avoid excessive brightness. Landscaping is discussed below. The applicant proposes no signage, and the submitted plans lack mechanical or utility equipment. Any subsequent desire for signage would require review of a separate permit application. Staff will review mechanical solutions with the associated building permit(s) ECDC 20.11.030fB1- Site Treatment. The existing character of the site and the nearby area p should be the starting point for the design of the building and all site treatment. The w r following are elements of site treatment: _ Q E 1. Grading, vegetation removal and other changes to the site shall be minimized where natural beauty exists. Large cut and fill and impervious surfaces should be avoided. 2. Landscape treatment shall be provided to enhance the building design and other site improvements. 3. Landscape treatment shall be provided to buffer the development from surrounding property where conflict may result, such as parking facilities near yard spaces, streets or residential units, and different building heights, design or color. 4. Landscaping that could be damaged by pedestrians or vehicles should be protected by curbing or similar devices. 5. Service yards, and other areas where trash or litter may accumulate, shall be screened with planting or fences or walls which are compatible with natural materials. 6. All screening should be effective in the winter as well as the summer. 7. Materials such as wood, brick, stone and gravel (as opposed to asphalt or concrete) maybe substituted for planting in areas unsuitable for plant growth. Pag Packet Pg. 21 File No. PLN2023-0071 Administrative Design Review Edmonds 222 Townhomes 8. Exterior lighting shall be the minimum necessary for safety and security. Excessive brightness shall be avoided. All lighting shall be low-rise and directed downward onto the site. Lighting standards and patterns shall be compatible with the overall design theme. Staff Analysis: The project's compliance with the applicable landscaping requirements of Chapter 20.13 ECDC is discussed in greater detail in the following section of this report. The applicant proposes no areas of wood, brick, stone or gravel in lieu of landscaping as part of this project, nor any service yard in need of screening. As previously mentioned, the most divergent use nearby is the City's wastewater treatment plant and associated facilities neighboring the site to the west. This property line requires Type I landscaping, the densest barrier. However, the applicant requests ADB's modification of this standard due to the presence of a sewer line in this area, as to comply with ECDC 20.13.020(N). The proposed development generally utilizes the existing topography onsite, though it includes grading necessary to provide a level driveway into the pull -under garages. The driveway cut will be supported by a retaining wall. Largely unvegetated, the removals proposed will be replaced in compliance with Chapter 20.13 ECDC (discussed below). Per the submitted SEPA checklist, the applicant proposes approximately 300 cubic yards of grading, which may potentially reuse up to 100 cubic yards of excavated material. The applicant submitted a site lighting plan (Sheet A1.6 of Attachment 3). Floodlights y mounted on the buildings illuminate the driveway. Step lights illuminate the walkway. Wall p sconces illuminate the building pedestrian entrances. All direct light downward and fit into w the site's design. _ a� E ECDC 20.11.030(C). Other Criteria. �a �a 1. Community facilities and public or quasi -public improvements should not conflict with the existing and planned character of the nearby area. 2. Street furniture (including but not limited to benches, light standards, utility poles, newspaper stands, bus shelters, planters, traffic signs and signals, guardrails, rockeries, walls, mail boxes, fire hydrants and garbage cans) should be compatible with the existing and planned character of the nearby area. Staff Analysis: The applicant proposed no street furniture. The proposal is not for a community facility. Improvements within the public right-of-way associated within the subject proposal will be reviewed by the Engineering Division at the time of building permit review to ensure compliance with all applicable Engineering requirements, including compliance with any necessary upgrades to the adjacent sidewalk and/or street tree(s). ECDC 20.13 — Landscaping Requirements: Development subject to general design review thereby required to satisfy the landscaping requirements of Chapter 20.13 ECDC. As previously mentioned, The submitted landscaping plan requests ADB's modification of the Type I landscaping required on the western property line due to the presence of a sewer line, as ECDC 20.13.020(N) suggests trees not be planted within five feet of water or sewer lines. Pag Packet Pg. 22 File No. PLN2023-0071 Administrative Design Review Edmonds 222 Townhomes ECDC 20.13.000 enables the ADB to modify the requirements of the landscaping code, provided the modification is consistent with the purposes of design review found in ECDC 20.10.000. Staff supports the applicant's proposed landscaping over the sewer line as an appropriate compromise of the Type I landscaping density and necessary sensitivity to utilities. Furthermore, only the residents of the proposed townhomes would be impacted by the decreased screening offered by this solution. The applicant's landscaping plan is included as Sheet L-1 of Attachment 4. Section 030 - Landscaping Types A. Type/ Landscaping. Type I landscaping is intended to provide a very dense sight barrier to significantly separate uses and land use districts. 1. Two rows of evergreen trees, a minimum of 10 feet in height and planted at intervals of no greater than 20 feet on center. The trees must be backed by a sight -obscuring fence a minimum of five feet high or the required width of the planting area must be increased by 10 feet, and 2. Shrubs a minimum of three and one-half feet in height planted in an area at least five feet in width, and other plant materials, planted so that the ground will be covered within three years; 3. Alternatively, the trees and shrubs maybe planted on an earthen berm at least 15 feet in width and an average of five feet high along its midline. C. Type HI Landscaping. Type III landscaping is intended to provide visual separation of uses c from streets, and visual separation of compatible uses so as to soften the appearance of Q E streets, parking areas and building elevations. �a 1. Evergreen and deciduous trees, with no more than 50 percent being deciduous, a minimum of six feet in height, and planted at intervals no greater than 30 feet on center, 3 t= and 2. If planted to buffer a building elevation, shrubs, a minimum of three and one-half feet in height, and living ground cover planted so that the ground will be covered within three years; or 3. If planted to buffer a parking area, access, or site development other than a building, any of the following alternatives maybe used unless otherwise noted: a. Shrubs, a minimum of three and one-half feet in height, and living ground cover must be planted so that the ground will be covered within three years. b. Earth -mounding, an average of three and one-half feet in height, planted with shrubs or livingground cover so that the ground will be covered within three years. This alternative may not be used in a downtown or waterfront area. c. A combination of earth mounding, opaque fences and shrubs to produce a visual barrier at least three and one-half feet in height. Pag Packet Pg. 23 File No. PLN2023-0071 Administrative Design Review Edmonds 222 Townhomes D. Type IV Landscaping. Type IV landscaping is intended to provide visual relief where clear sight is desired to see signage or into adjacent space for safety concerns. Trees shall be deciduous and planted 25 feet on center and the trunk shall be free of branches below six feet in height. 2. Plant materials which will cover the ground within three years, and which will not exceed three and one-half feet in height. Staff Analysis: The applicant requests ADB's approval of the proposed modification to the western boundary's Type I landscaping to accommodate the sewer line running through that area per ECDC 20.13.020(IV). Modifying this requirement would exclusively reduce the barrier between the western townhomes and the City's wastewater treatment facilities. The proposed landscaping offers a next - best alternative compatible with the sewer line. The north and south property lines would receive landscaping compliant with Type III, sufficiently softening the townhomes' driveway and building elevations. The landscaping proposed along the street face along V Ave. S needs Type IV landscaping to provide clear lines of sight to and from the right-of-way. Engineering will review street trees along with the requisite frontage improvements with the forthcoming permit application(s) (Attachment 9). ECDC 23.10 — Tree Related Regulations New multi -family developments must provide a tree retention and protection plan that retains at least 25% of all significant trees on the developable site. Q E When there are not enough trees outside of the areas to be improved to meet the retention requirement, the applicant shall make up the deficiency, consistent with ECDC 23.10.060(F)(4), as follows: a. Planting a number of new trees on -site in accordance with the ratios established in ECDC 23.10.080 (see table below); and b. If replanting is not feasible, the applicant shall make a fee -in -lieu payment of $2,500 for every tree not planted. Furthermore, lots with fewer than three trees per 8,000 square feet must plant to achieve that tree density. The landscaping requirements of Chapter 20.13 ECDC exceed this stipulation. Significant trees less than 24" DBH are to be replaced at the following ratios: Tree Size Replacement Ratio Viable Trees Removed Replacements Required Six to 10" DBH 1:1 0 0 10.1 " to 14" DBH 2:1 0 0 14.1 " to 24" DBH 1 3:1 1 3 Total I - 1 3 Pag Packet Pg. 24 File No. PLN2023-0071 Administrative Design Review Edmonds 222 Townhomes The applicant is required to pay fees -in -lieu for any viable tree removed that is greater than 24" DBH. Fees -in -lieu shall be based on an appraisal of the tree as outlined in ECDC 23.10.080(E). Staff Analysis: Even including the modification to the Type I landscape, the landscape proposed more than satisfy the three required replacements for the removed cherry tree and provide a density of at least three trees per 8,000 square feet. XI I. CONCLUSION Based on the above analysis of the project proposal, as conditioned, the project is consistent with the urban design objectives of the Comprehensive Plan and the Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC), particularly the requirements of the Multiple Residential (RM) zone, the onsite parking requirements, the design review process, and the landscaping requirements. XIII. RECOMMENDATION Based on the facts, conclusions, and attachments to this report, staff recommends that the ADB approve the project design in File PLN2023-0071 with the following conditions: 1. The site plans submitted in application for the subsequent building permit(s) shall = demonstrate compliance with Chapter 17.115 — Electric Vehicle Char"n a .y Infrastructure, Chapter 17.120 — Bicycle Parking Facilities, and Title 18 — Public Works G Requirements. r 2. All plantings must meet the sizing requirements found in Section 20.13.015 ECDC — E Plant Schedule. A performance and maintenance bond will be required per ECDC 20.13.040. �a 3. Significant trees that are removed must be replaced in accordance with ECDC 23.10.080. XIV. EXPIRATION The following is a summary of the deadlines and procedures for filing extensions. Any person wishing to file an extension should contact the Planning Division at (425) 771-0220 for further procedural information. Expiration — ECDC 20.12.090(A): Unless the owner submits a fully completed building permit application necessary to bring about the approved alterations, or, if no building permit application is required, substantially commences the use allowed within 18 months from the date of approval, ADB or hearing examiner approval shall expire and be null and void, unless the owner files a fully completed application for an extension of time prior to the expiration date. Pag Packet Pg. 25 XV. XVI. PARTIES OF RECORD City of Edmonds Jacob Young 121 511 Ave. N Citizen Design Edmonds, WA 98020 10 Dravus St. Seattle, WA 98109 Del Mar Condominium Association Helen M. Jolly 210 3rd Ave. S 221 3rd Ave. S Edmonds, WA 98020 Unit 8 Edmonds, WA 98020 Linda Norton and Dennis Trapp Pam Tauer 224 3rd Ave. S 210 3rd Ave. S Apt 201 Unit C Edmonds, WA 98020 Edmonds, WA 98020 gleannpamCcbgmail.com ATTACHMENTS 1. Land Use Application Form 2. Cover Letter 3. Plan Set 4. Landscape Plan 5. Irrigation Plan 6. Tree Retention and Protection Plan 7. Arborist Report 8. Preliminary Civil Plan 9. Engineering Compliance Memorandum 10. Fire Preliminary Comments Memorandum 11. Determination of Completeness 12. Notice of Application 13. Notice of Public Hearing 14. Public Comments 15. SEPA Materials File No. PLN2023-0071 Administrative Design Review Edmonds 222 Townhomes Laurel Anderson anderson.LlaureL a gmail.com Gary Neuman 229 3rd Ave. S Apt 202 Edmonds, WA 98020 Vienna Zigalla 224 3rd Ave. S #102 Edmonds, WA 98020 Pag Packet Pg. 26 CITY OF EDMONDS MyBuildingPermit.com Land Use Application #1381610 - Edmonds 222 - 5 unit Applicant First Name Last Name Company Name Jacob Younq Citizen Desiqn Number Street Apartment or Suite Number E-mail Address 10 Dravus Street jyounq('�Dcollaborativeco.com City State Zip Phone Number Extension Seattle WA 98109 (206) 535-7908 Contractor Company Name Number Street city State License Number Project Location State Zip License Expiration Date UBI # Number Street 222 3RD AVE S City Zip Code County Parcel Number EDMONDS 98020 27032300409500 Associated Building Permit Number Tenant Name PRE2023-0005 Additional Information (i.e. equipment location or special instructions). Work Location Property Owner Apartment or Suite Number Phone Number Extension E-mail Address Floor Number Suite or Room Number First Name Last Name or Company Name Auqustus Bukowski Number Street Apartment or Suite Number 222 3RD AVE S City State Zip EDMONDS WA 98020-3502 Certification Statement - The applicant states: certify that I am the owner of this property or the owner's authorized agent. If acting as an authorized agent, I further certify that I have full power and authority to file this application and to perform, on behalf of the owner, all acts required to enable the jurisdiction to process and review such application. have furnished true and correct information. I will comply with all provisions of law and ordinance governing this type of application. If the scope of work requires a licensed contractor to perform the work, the information will be provided prior to permit issuance. Date Submitted: 10/10/2023 Submitted By: Jacob Young d Q L M N N N 0 O M N O N Z J a m d C .y N r c tv E s U R �a 3 0 a d tE r co T_ ti O O M N O N Z J a C d E s V f4 Q Packet Pg. 27 Page 1 of 2 CITY OF EDMONDS MyBuildinBPermit.com Land Use Application #1381610 - Edmonds 222 - 5 unit Project Contact Company Name: Citizen Design Name: Jacob Young Email: jyoung@collaborativeco.com Address: 10 Dravus Street Phone #: (206) 535-7908 Seattle WA 98109 Project Type Activity Type Scope of Work New New Development Activity Design Review Project Name: Edmonds 222 - 5 unit Description of CONSTRUCT FIVE TOWNHOUSES IN TWO BUILDINGS EXISTING STRUCTURES TO Work: BE DEMOLISHED. DIVIDE SUBJECT PARCEL INTO (5) RESULTANT LOTS AND (1) COMMON TRACT VIA SHORT SUBDIVISION. Project Details Development Type Residential Packet Pg. 28 Page 2 of 2 CITIZEN DESIGN COLLABORATIVECO.COM DATE September 9, 2024 206.535.7908 TO City of Edmonds Development Services Department 121 5th Avenue N WE ARE FAMILY Edmonds, WA 98020 DESIGNING INSPIRED SPACE PROJECT Edmonds 222 Townhouses TO CREATE COMMUNITY To Whom It May Concern: This letter is provided to explain, in narrative form, the proposed townhouse project Located at 222 3rd Avenue's compliance with applicable design standards. The following sections describe the project, applicable design standards and the design's response to them. Please feel free to contact our office if additional information is needed for review or if you have any questions. Humbly submitted, Citizen Design w r c Project Description E The development will consist of two buildings containing five residential townhouses. s 0 The subject parcel currently contains one single family residence which will be M w demolished. As can be seen on Sheet A1.1, the subject is rectangular in shape with a its long axis oriented from east to west. The townhouses are arranged parallel to 3 this axis. The two eastern townhouses directly abut the 3rd Avenue S. right-of-way, with a single curb cut to the north. The remaining units can be seen beyond. n The subject is located within the RM-1.5 zone and does not abut a designated street frontage. Applicable design standards are therefore found in ECDC 20.11. ECDC 20.11.030.A : Massing and Articulation As can be seen by the building elevations and renderings [A3.1-A3.41, the townhouses have been designed with a distinctive base and top, as well as individually articulated roof lines. The top steps back from the street and utilizes vertical board siding while the base utilizes a dark brick veneer to provide the classic appearance of masonry. A belly band is provided in areas where there is not articulation between materials to reinforce the transition. Bay windows are used on the front units to break up the street -facing facade and add visual interest. The roof line of each townhome is designed to further indicate the delineation between each separate unit, breaking up the larger buildings into human -scale units. Even the layout of gutters and downspouts is intended to further reinforce the separation of the buildings into individual units. Recessed entryways and canopies provide an inviting transition from the street and draw attention to the unit entrances. Edmonds 222 1 Design Narrative 12024 Packet Pg. 29 CITIZEN DESIGN ECDC 20.11.030.B : Site Treatment The site layout for this project follows the topography of the site where it can rather than relying on a large amount of excavation or regrading. The unit entrances are placed at varying heights between the buildings in order to maintain the existing grade where possible. Additionally, the proposal uses the steep site to Lessen the appearance of cars and garages by tucking them away below street Level. All pedestrian access is provided via a common walkway along the south side of the site. This walkway is accessed directly from the 3rd Avenue sidewalk and is protected by landscaping between the path and neighboring buildings. Landscaping is also used to create beauty and soften the transition between the street -facing units and the right-of-way. Exterior lighting is kept to a minimum and specifically focused around unit entrances and pedestrian access. ECDC 20.11.030.0 : Other Criteria This section is not applicable to this project. ECDC 20.13.000 : Landscape Modifications An existing sewer main conflicts with the landscape buffer along the westerly boundary line. This requires modification of the Type 1 landscape buffer to eliminate the requirement for evergreen trees as the trees would prevent access to the sewer for maintenance. Large and medium shrubs and a privacy fence are proposed instead. Refer to the landscape plans for details. Pursuant to this section, the project requests a modification to the requirements for Type 1 landscaping [ECDC 20.13.030.A] to eliminate the required two rows of evergreen trees. Edmonds 222 1 Design Narrative 12024 2 Packet Pg. 30 1lu[91►1I 11: I lytyl 0 I:N sho rove - • .• �• •/r s�t� s - rub. _ -Z MWW i me.l 960b. . •; � - . _ � _ f`� �=ems s► �':' � • � ��r -� ..�..� ■fir :s 4f -. i• • s,• • �• ,fir i , "' ` J ♦ 'ram +• �' �_ � �_ �• • � � • � ►Y VA*+ •r� , _ •/ , r �' • _ �; L lkj op -� • w • tr• -40 # ♦ " -1 *" i tk lk. E • KEYNOTES SCOPE OF WORK VICINITY MAP a NTS 15'-0" PROPOSED PUBLIC / UTILITY EASEMENT \ \ 0 ' \ 0 D- 777-7 0 FG:32.5'± 1 S I I 1 TYP. �I 1 15 FG=33.2'± 1 � I 1 I � � 0 +I ° in o C U) 2 1 cl I I I I diI � I II I I � I I Io I i IN DN _ 13 TRY P5E: D N W 13 i ENTRY +I FFE:35.4' in. a 210 3RD AVENUE S APN: 006464-0000 ZONED: RM-1.5 0 HEIGHT LIMIT DIAGRAM SCALE: 1" = 20' `J / 15'-0" FRONT STBK 128'± R N 88°4357 W t N v P FG7 5 D o m 35.95'+ M-7 4rx gp o D o �� ' rn ul O W 12 S S S J p .. d v V .o Q ° Ml ° P v - - 26.5'± - - - FG a pv.. P FG a { +I ° .LIDp . ° 20 FG a ;.\ D 37.71'± -D �,_D . a ° 44.01'± - 44.17'+ `; . a'p V. w. a p NLu �i cl�p ° 4 ° I v . sue- cb ' FG p v .Q ° - -- - - - - - - r, ♦GARAGE a p I 8 44.35'± 19 L I.w. l .a., a. 19 'q AVG (E) GRADE CALCS BUILDING 1 < 40.8' + 45.0' + 45.0' + 40.7' = 171.5' 171.5' / 4 = 42.875' z 42.9' BUILDING 2 32.5' + 36.2' + 37.9' + 33.2' = 139.8' £ 139.8' / 4 = 34.95' 35.0' d d ' 33' -0" HALF ROW t7 I I d I r� I I II LL a P 8p - ° L- -- - - - - - - - JIlk p 10 d p 18 � � 15 ° I � I I p I p P P P a �° 21 P � �- Pa a ry C" GARAGE. ,GARAGE ♦ 1 �"� is- BLDG 2: (3) TOWNHOUSES ° ° I a ° �' a +1 +I o (3) STORIES a °a v y p p M- - - - - - `14 T N aTYP. d ± FOOTPRINT AREA: 2340± SF - - M 3 I ° 2 I AGLA: 1737± SF EACH p FG d U- TYP +1 GARAGE: 511±SF EACH L` 35.70'± N u o 2 a a ° ENTRY r- 0 CO I TYP. P ° p 3. El TYR° i ° - BLDG 1: (2) TOWNHOUSES LL DN �o ° - J Q 10 I _ dv ° ° (3) STORIES LL ° I -v' - ---FOOTPRINT AREA: 1656±SF----- --- ° - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 3a v AGLA: 2029± SF EACH °° 14 I d 24'-0" BACKING P DISTANCE ° "'- - - - - GARAGE: 500±SF EACH o p :� v DN b °� a i a p w 8 TYP. � v a I ° �I p 10 ENTRY WU- W W W WTYP. ° 9.4. W�W W I p a a I a 20 ° +I SIDEWALK . FFE: 35.4'± - - - - - - 04 v L _ M Lu - M�i � p I . ° /� t ENTRY +I GARAGE I GARAGE 71� _ ° I d V . 3 5' 0" - P FG _ n 21 � o 35.84'± P . D N FG 34.0'± f i -L ■ �■ �■ �■ �■ �■■■�■ �■■�■ �■�1��0��.■1u�� li:�i■V:r��■1,1:,Il■liIliIiii ■ �0111�1■.MEM■E�M„L0�1■m ■ ■I:K 0 ■■■■mn , I■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ II .0 ■MIliffi:I-EMEM■. pM■s■lIlilaa1 MEMO! IN m■m�l■mi■■■I■�111M aim i 128'± R N 88043'57" W -} vl 1 P. 16�J REAR g� STBK CD`I\ v 5 2 PRELIMINARY ZONING SITE PLAN SCALE: 1 " = 10' 224 3RD AVENUE S APN: 006810-0000 ZONED: RM-1.5 N Lu P P w 'a CM W W W-_� W W W--1 0 5 10 20 1 " = 10' 1. (E) TREE TO BE REMOVED. 2. APPROX. LOCATION OF (E) UTILITIES. SHOWN FOR REF. ONLY. 3. DEMOLISH (E) STRUCTURES UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT. 4. (E) UTILITY POLE PER CIVIL. SHOWN FOR REF. ONLY. 5. CONCRETE RETAINING WALL PER STRC'L. 6. 5 FT WIDE WALKWAY. 7. 5 FT WIDE SITE STAIRS. 8. 8.5 FT x 16.5 FT PARKING SPACE. 9. LINE OF CANOPY (ABOVE). 10. (N) UTILITIES PER CIVIL. SHOWN FOR REF. ONLY. 11. CATCH BASIN PER CIVIL. SHOWN FOR REF. ONLY. 12. PUMP STRUCTURE PER CIVIL. SHOWN FOR REF. ONLY. 13. ELEVATED PORCH ENTRY 14. 3 FT BY 35 FT REFUSE STAGING AREA. 15. FUTURE UNIT LOT LINE (TYP.) 16. (N) TREE PER LANDSCAPE (TYP.) 17. RESERVED 18. MOTOR COURT 19. GRADE BREAK 20. LOCATION OF R TANK 21. PROPOSED WINDOW WELL EDMONDS DESIGN STANDARDS CODE COMPLIANCE 2018 SRC / TYPE V-B / OCC. R3 / ZONED RM-1.5 PERMITTED USES: ALLOWED: MULTIPLE DWELLINGS (ECDC 16.30.010.A.1) PROPOSED: TOWNHOUSES LOT AREA: ALLOWED: MINIMUM LOT AREA PER (ECDC 16.30.030.A) DWELLING UNIT: 1500 SF PROPOSED: LOT AREA = 10,890 SF / 5 TOWNHOUSES 2,178 SF PER TOWNHOUSE FRONT SIDE (EA) REAR SETBACKS: REQUIRED: 15 FT 10 FT 15 FT (ECDC 16.30.030.A) PROPOSED: 15 FT 10 FT 15 FT STRUCTURE HEIGHT: ALLOWED: 30 FT ABOVE AVERAGE (ECDC 16.30.030.A) EXISTING GRADE (REF. CALC, 2/A1.2) BLDG. 1: 42.9 + 30' = 72.9'1 BLDG. 2: 35' + 30' = 65' PROPOSED: BLDG. 1 = 29.6' BLDG. 2 = 30' (REF. A1.3) MAXIMUM COVERAGE ALLOWED: 45% = 4,900 SF (ECDC 16.30.030.A) PROPOSED: 2340 SF + 2024 = 4,364 SF DRAWING INDEX A0.0 COVER SHEET AllPRELIMINARY ZONING SITE PLAN A1.2 PRELIMINARY ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN A1.3 PRELIMINARY SITE SECTIONS AND DIAGRAMS A1.4 PRELIMINARY SITE SECTIONS AND DIAGRAMS A1.5 VICINITY MAP A1.6 CONCEPTUAL LIGHTING PLAN A2.1 PRELIMINARY FLOOR PLANS A3.1 RENDERED ELEVATIONS A3.2 RENDERINGS A3.3 RENDERINGS A3.4 CHARACTER STUDY C01 CIVIL SITE PLAN CO2 DRIVEWAY GRADING PLAN CO3 DETAILS L-1 LANDSCAPE PLAN L-2 PLANTING DETAILS IR-1 IRRIGATION PLAN T-1 TREE RETENTION AND PROTECTION PLAN 1 OF 1 SURVEY CONSTRUCT FIVE TOWNHOUSES IN TWO BUILDINGS, PER PLANS AND AS FOLLOWS: • (2) UNITS w/ 1976± SF AGLA AND 514± SF TWO -CAR GARAGE • (2) UNITS w/ 1674± SF AGLA AND 529± SF TWO -CAR GARAGE • (1) UNITS w/ 1670± SF AGLA AND 529± SF TWO -CAR GARAGE EXISTING STRUCTURES TO BE DEMOLISHED. DIVIDE SUBJECT PARCEL INTO (5) RESULTANT LOTS AND (1) COMMON TRACT VIA UNIT LOT SUBDIVISION. ESTABLISH USE AND OCCUPY, PER PLANS. PROJ ECT I N FO. SITE ADDRESS 222 3RD AVENUE S EDMONDS, WA 98020 PARCEL MAP NUMBERS 270323-004-095-00 LEGAL DESCRIPTION SEC 23 TWP 27 RGE 03RT-101) BEG 150 FT S OF SW COR DAYTON & 3RD STS EDMONDS TH S 85 FT TH W 128 FT TH N 85 FT TH E 128 FT TO POB LOT AREA AND ZONING LOT AREA: 10,890± SF (0.25± AC) ZONING: RM-1.5 JURISDICTION EDMONDS, SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON BUILDING INFORMATION (3) PROPOSED STORIES PROPOSED OCCUPANCY: R-3 (TOWNHOUSE) CONSTRUCTION: TYPE VB, ALL LEVELS FIRE SUPPRESSION: NFPA 13D SPRINKLERS REQUIRED SEPA COMPLIANCE THE CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION FOR NEW RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION IS (4) DWELLING UNITS. THIS PROJECT PROPOSES (5) NEW DWELLING UNITS AND IS SUBJECT TO ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW. PROJECT DIRECTORY OWNER AND DEVELOPER BUKOWSKI READ ENTERPRISES PO BOX 1478 EDMONDS, WA 98020 ARCHITECT + APPLICANT CITIZEN DESIGN 10 DRAVUS STREET SEATTLE, WA 98109 CONTACT: JACOB YOUNG TEL: 206.853.8055 EMAIL: JYOUNG@COLLABORATIVECO.COM CIVIL ENGINEER FACET 9706 4TH AVENUE NE #300 SEATTLE, WA 98115 CONTACT: BEN IDDINS TEL: 206.523.0024 EMAIL: BIDDINS@FACETNW.COM SURVEYOR CHADWICK + WINTERS 1422 NW 85TH STREET SEATTLE, WA 98117 CONTACT: BRANDON WINTERS TEL: 206.297.0996 EMAIL: BRANDONW@CHADWICKWINTERS.COM LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT + ARBORIST RUSSELL + LAMBERT 7724 2ND AVENUE NE SEATTLE, WA 98115 CONTACT: MARY ELLEN RUSSELL TEL: 206.898.6312 EMAIL: MARYELLEN@RUSSELL-LAMBERT.COM GENERAL CONTRACTOR TBD CITIZEN DESIGN T d a' M N N N 0 0 M N 0 N Z J a 2D m c CDN N d o 00 01 Cn = N s N o N o 3 o a fl' W o Z L U) Z U W ti o N Q o V M o N Q z N J O_ C N c d t City of EDMONDS Q Design Review September 9, 2024 FOR PLANNING DEPT USE ONLY PRELIMINARY ZONING SITE PLAN SCALE: AS NOTED 1 ■ Packet Pg. 32 VICINITY MAP a NTS KEYNOTES SCOPE OF WORK 210 3RD AVENUE S APN: 006464-0000 ZONED: RM-1.5 STBK \ jr=77 224 3RD AVENUE S APN: 006810-0000 ZONED: RM-1.5 PRELI M I NARY ARCH ITECTU RAL SITE PLAN SCALE: I" = 10' N 33'-0" I HALF ROW I I I I I I I I I I I 0 5 10 20 III = 101 1. (E) TREE TO BE REMOVED. 2. DEMOLISH (E) STRUCTURES UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT. 3. (N) RETAINING CONCRETE WALL PER STRC'L. 4. 5 FT WIDE WALKWAY. 5. 5 FT WIDE SITE STAIRS. 6. 8.5 FT x 16.5 FT PARKING SPACE. 7. LINE OF CANOPY (ABOVE). 8. ELEVATED PORCH ENTRY 9. FUTURE UNIT LOT LINE (TYP.) 10. (N) TREE PER LANDSCAPE PLAN, L1.0 (TYP.) 11. (N) SHRUB PER LANDSCAPE PLAN, L1.0 (TYP.) 12. MOTOR COURT 13. GRADE BREAK 14. LOCATION OF R TANK 15. PROPOSED WINDOW WELL CONSTRUCT FIVE TOWNHOUSES IN TWO BUILDINGS, PER PLANS AND AS FOLLOWS: • (2) UNITS w/ 1976± SF AGLA AND 514± SF TWO -CAR GARAGE • (2) UNITS w/ 1674± SF AGLA AND 529± SF TWO -CAR GARAGE • (1) UNITS w/ 1670± SF AGLA AND 529± SF TWO -CAR GARAGE EXISTING STRUCTURES TO BE DEMOLISHED DIVIDE SUBJECT PARCEL INTO (5) RESULTANT LOTS AND (1) COMMON TRACT VIA UNIT LOT SUBDIVISION. ESTABLISH USE AND OCCUPY, PER PLANS. PROJECT INFO. SITE ADDRESS 222 3RD AVENUE S EDMONDS. WA 98020 PARCEL MAP NUMBERS 270323-004-095-00 LEGAL DESCRIPTION SEC 23 TWP 27 RGE 03RT-101) BEG 150 FT S OF SW COR DAYTON & 3RD STS EDMONDS TH S 85 FT TH W 128 FT TH N 85 FT TH E 128 FT TO POB LOT AREA AND ZONING LOT AREA: 10,890± SF (0.25± AC) ZONING: RM-1.5 JURISDICTION EDMONDS, SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON BUILDING INFORMATION (3) PROPOSED STORIES PROPOSED OCCUPANCY: R-3 (TOWNHOUSE) CONSTRUCTION: TYPE VB, ALL LEVELS FIRE SUPPRESSION: NFPA 13D SPRINKLERS REQUIRED SEPA COMPLIANCE THE CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION FOR NEW RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION IS (4) DWELLING UNITS. THIS PROJECT PROPOSES (5) NEW DWELLING UNITS AND IS SUBJECT TO ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW. PROJECT DIRECTORY OWNER AND DEVELOPER BUKOWSKI READ ENTERPRISES PO BOX 1478 EDMONDS. WA 98020 ARCHITECT + APPLICANT CITIZEN DESIGN 10 DRAVUS STREET SEATTLE, WA 98109 CONTACT: JACOB YOUNG TEL: 206.853.8055 EMAIL: JYOUNG@COLLABORATIVECO.COM CIVIL ENGINEER FACET 9706 4TH AVENUE NE #300 SEATTLE, WA 98115 CONTACT: BEN IDDINS TEL: 206.523.0024 EMAIL: BIDDINS@FACETNW.COM 411.01vi will.i CHADWICK + WINTERS 1422 NW 85TH STREET SEATTLE, WA 98117 CONTACT: BRANDON WINTERS TEL: 206.297.0996 EMAIL: BRANDONW@CHADWICKWINTERS.COM LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT + ARBORIST RUSSELL + LAMBERT 7724 2ND AVENUE NE SEATTLE, WA 98115 CONTACT: MARY ELLEN RUSSELL TEL: 206.898.6312 EMAIL: MARYELLEN@RUSSELL-LAMBERT.COM GENERAL CONTRACTOR TBD Z _0 V N� 1..1� U J Z 0 U ry 0 LL 0 Z IN5 X" Y �-i �(rlt } CITIZEN DESIGN O N O co 0� a N Ln N o CV o o W vi o Z LU U Z W 'a o U M 04 W N C N City of EDMONDS Design Review September 9, 2024 FOR PLANNING DEPT USE ONLY PRELIMINARY ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN SCALE: AS NOTED Al 02 Packet Pg. 33 15'-0" SETBACK 80 R 15'-0" SEWER 70 ESMT I I I � I BUILDING 2 HT. LIMIT: 65.0'± I 60 I � I a I � I I I 50 b I I a I I I I I 40 I I I BUILDING 2 AVG GRADE: 35.0'± 30 1 1/I (E) SEWER MAIN �/ 7'-6' LONGITUDINAL SECTION SCALE: I" = 10' 10'-0" 80 STBK R 70 65.0'± 60 50 40 :35.0'± 30 TRANSVERSE SECTION AT BUILDING 2 SCALE: I" = 10' 24'-0" DRIVEWAY 10'-0" STBK R 15'-0" SETBACK R I 10'-0.. 10'-0" lo STBK STBK 80 R - BUILDING 1 HT. LIMIT: 72.9'± - - - - - - - - - — 70 M 60 I 50 - I 3RD AVE S o N— -0�- BUILDING 1 AVG GRADE: 42.9'± RTANK I 40 I 1 15'-0" SETBACK 80 70 BUILDING 2 HT. LIMIT: 65.0'± -0-- I 60 50 40 BUILDING 2 AVG GRADE: 35.0'± +-- I 30 �� 1 (E) SEWER MAIN I 1 / I / I i T-6" LONGITUDINAL SECTION SCALE: I" = 10' 30 TRANSVERSE SECTION AT BUILDING 1 SCALE: I" = 10' 01 24'-0" 00 DRIVEWAY 15'-0" SETBACK $BUILDING 1 HT. LIMIT: 72.9'± I I 3RD AVE S N RTANK i.i $BUILDING 1 AVG GRADE:42.9'± I 0 5 10 20 1"=10' CITIZEN DESIGN N d Q -a M N N N r O O M N O N z J a 3 m m c a� o a� Q E N N o (V zo 3 o C 0 CL Z L Cl) U O z W ti N Q O ' = V 0 N N Q Lu CY) N J d C N C N E t City of EDMONDS Q Design Review September 9. 2024 FOR PLANNING DEPT USE ONLY PRELIMINARY SITE SECTIONS SCALE: AS NOTED Al 3 ■ Packet Pg. 34 80 70 I BUILDING 2 HT. LIMIT: 65.0'±I 60 50 40 I BUILDING 2 AVG GRADE: 35.0'±I 15'-0" SETBACK 15'-0" SEWER ESMT I 30 1F/I (E) SEWER MAIN I / / I 7'-6" LONGITUDINAL SECTION AT DRI SCALE: 1 " = 10' VEWAY 24'-0" DRIVEWAY —FFE:36.5' ol 15'-0" SETBACK RTANK "`N BUILDING 1 HT. LIMIT: 72.9'± 3RD AVE S BUILDING 1 AVG GRADE: 42.9'± Z O ND 1..1� u+ Z O C) O 0 5 10 20 LL O 1"=10' Z CITIZEN DESIGN d Q M N N N r O O M N 0 N z J a m am c T N aD o a� Q E N N o M (V zo 3 o C 0 CL Z L Cl) U z O W ti O N Q ' = 0 N 0 V CD N Q CY) J Lu N a. C N C N E t 0 R r.+ City of EDMONDS Q Design Review September 9. 2024 FOR PLANNING DEPT USE ONLY PRELIMINARY SITE SECTIONS SCALE: AS NOTED Al 4 ■ 1 Packet Pg. 35 BUS STOP: DAYTON ST & 2ND AVE S EDMONDS LANDING I 209 DAYTON STREET ASSISTED LIVING a AW_P a DRIFTWOOD ' ANNEX ARTWORKS EDMONDS EDMONDS WASTEWATER TREATMENT 01 ti s M l i • — 1 J 152 3RD AVENUE N 3RD AVENUE N a 320 DAYTON STREET I US BANK BRANCH F W r _ A 1 � I" r � k At OL 1 + - inn* JP Imp �, - • r - i fee INV ALBER H COHEN DESIGN CO. 210 3RD AVENUE S SEABROOK APARTMENTS w DEL MAR APARTMENTS THE ATRIUM APARTMENTS HARBORGATE APARTMENTS W SHORE VIEW � I � I I CONDOMINIUMS 217 ALDER STREET APARTMENTS 230 3RD AVENUES 317 3RD AVENUES CG ENGINEERING Z O u re O VICINITY MAP N LL SCALE: NTS 0 II CITIZEN DESIGN O N O AO V_ N N u'' ` N o r o w ` o Z LU f f Z w 'a N�o o U Q M ` C WN 04 N r City of EDMONDS Design Review September 9, 2024 M FOR PLANNING DEPT USE ONLY VICINITY MAP SCALE: AS NOTED ■ Packet Pg. 36 JS EXTERIOR LIGHTING FIXTURE SCHEDULE 1❑ WALL SCONCE WALL SCONCES ARE LOCATED ON THE EAST FACADE OF BUILDING 1 (BY THE ENTRY DOORS) AND ON THE NORTH AND SOUTH FACADES OF BUILDING 2 (BY THE ENTRY DOORS). "MODERN COUNTRY CAGE OUTDOOR WALL LIGHT" BY SHADES OF LIGHT COLOR: BLACK MAX. WATTAGE: 60W 2 STEP LIGHT STEP LIGHTS ARE LOCATED ALONG ALL WALKWAYS STEPS THAT CONNECT BOTH BUILDINGS. "LED STEP LIGHT" BY NUVO LIGHTING COLOR: BLACK WATTAGE: 5W INTEGRATED LAMP: 407 LUMENS 3 FLOOD LIGHT SURFACE MOUNT FIXTURES ARE LOCATED ADJACENT TO GARAGE DOORS TO PROVIDE LIGHT TO MOTOR COURT. "FLOOD LIGHT 2 LIGHT 13" BY GENERATION LIGHTING COLOR: BLACK WATTAGE: 240 WATTS 020 WATTS PER BULB) CONCEPTUAL LIGHTING PLAN SCALE: N/A N 0 5 10 20 1"=10' CITIZEN DESIGN O N O 00 0� a N N N o `N o v! o w vi o Z LU U Z W 'a C o O Q Q= U M C W N C (N City of EDMONDS Design Review September 9, 2024 FOR PLANNING DEPT USE ONLY CONCEPTUAL LIGHTING PLAN T d a M N N N T I - CD M N O N Z J IL m o: N d Cn r� _ d E s V Cu 3 w 0 a a� cc ti 0 O M N 0 N Z J a w _ d t V w a SCALE: AS NOTED Al 6 ■ 1 Packet Pg. 37 10 46'-0" 00 23'-0" V 23'-0" L0 14'-8 1/2" IM- A THIRD STORY 46'-0" 00 23'-0" 0 ao M SECOND STORY N N O bD M 14'-81/2" 23'-0" 46'-0" 00 23'-0" 23'-0" FFE: 36.5 '± FFE: 36.5 '± I I I II II I I I UNIT A I I I I UNIT B , I I I II II I I I I I I I I I GARAGE I n n GARAGE o I I I I II II I I N �- - I L F— =1 E FIRST STORY CM n BUILDING1: (2) 3-STORY TOWNHOMES FOOTPRINT AREA: 1656± SF AVG (E) GRADE: 42.9'± AGLA UNIT A: 1955 ± AGLA UNIT B: 1966± GARAGE: 514± SF EACH BLDG 1 - PRELIMINARY FLOOR PLANS IN SCALE: 1/8" = 1' 0 M O �0 fM N N_ L? �0 N 01 21'-10 3/4" 65'-0" 21'-8" 21'-5 1/4" LAUNDRYI • ' I • �. I, � �1111111111111111111, 1111111111111111111, � 11 III■- � 11 IIIIIIIII'Illllllll1 IIIIIIIII'Illllllll1 IIIIIIIII,IIIIIIIII, -02 1 THIRD STORY 65'-0" 21 '-10 3/4" 21 '-8" 21 '-5 1 /4" SECOND STORY 65'-0" 9'-9" 12'-1 3/4" 11'-11 1/2" 9'-3" 12'-1 3/4" 9'4" 11 I rDEN ■ ■ I 1111 DEN DEN Lu iD- � F- MMIN MM MM 1111111111111111111,'lll■III■ mm[�F'. 111111111,1111111111 IIIIIIIII�' 71111111111 `1111111111 it i i till, GARAGE GARAGE GARAGE MENEL- r rC: JJ.7 rrC: JJ.7 rFC: JJ.7 21'-10 3/4" 21'-8" 21'-5 1/4" FIRST STORY BUILDING 2: (3) 3-STORYTOWNHOMES FOOTPRINT AREA: 2340± SF AVG (E) GRADE: 35'± AGLA: (2 UNITS) 1674± SF (1 UNIT) = 1670± SF GARAGE: 529± SF EACH 2 BLDG 2 - PRELIMINARY FLOOR PLANS IN ,,, 0 4 8 16 A2.1 SCALE: 1 /8" = 1 ' z _0 V U J z 0 C) ry 0 LL 0 z CITIZEN DESIGN O N O co 01. Q N N o ,CV o vI o w cri o Z LU U Z w L Q N C 0 O Q 0= U M O N WC N City of EDMONDS Design Review September 9. 2024 FOR PLANNING DEPT USE ONLY PRELIMINARY FLOOR PLANS d Q M N N N r O O M N O N Z J a m d C T N N N r.+ C d 3 0 a a� C0 ti O O M N O N Z J a c d t 0 r Q SCALE: AS NOTED A201 Packet Pg. 38 FIBERGLASS WINDOWS AND DOORS (BLACK) METAL PANEL (BLACK) 1�i%1��IiP►[�7� JiT19I81111101r-AlI3i (N) SHRUBS PER L'SCAPE. SOME TREES NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY. FIBERGLASS WINDOWS AND DOORS (BLACK) BRICK VENEER SIDING (EARTH TONES) VERTICAL LAP SIDING (WHITE) BLDG 1 - EAST ELEVATION SCALE: 1 /8" = 1 ' BLDG 2 - EAST ELEVATION SCALE: 1 /8" = 1 ' NORTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1 /8" = 1 ' VERTICAL LAP SIDING (WHITE) FIBERGLASS WINDOWS AND DOORS (BLACK) METAL CANOPY (BLACK) ENTRY DOOR (BLACK) BRICK VENEER SIDING (EARTH TONES) GARAGE DOOR (BLACK) FIBERGLASS WINDOWS AND DOORS (BLACK) VERTICAL LAP SIDING (WHITE) DOWNSPOUTS (BLACK) BRICK VENEER SIDING (EARTH TONES) GARAGE DOOR (BLACK) STANDING SEAM ME ROOF (BLACK) VERTICAL LAP SIDING (WHITE) ENTRY DOOR (BLA( �y t BLDG 1 - WEST ELEVATION SCALE: 1 /8" = 1 ' BLDG 2 - WEST ELEVATION SCALE: 1 /8" = 1 ' SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1 /8" = 1 ' STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF (BLACK) FIBERGLASS WINDOWS AND DOORS (BLACK) METAL PANEL (BLACK) DOWNSPOUTS (BLACK) BRICK VENEER SIDING (EARTH TONES) STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF (BLACK) FIBERGLASS WINDOWS AND DOORS (BLACK) BRICK VENEER SIDING (EARTH TONES) Z 0 (N) SHRUBS PER L'SCAPE. SOME TREES NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY. V N� 1..1� u Z 0 U ry 0 LL 0 Z CITIZEN DESIGN T a L M N CD N T O M N O N Z J a 3 a� m c o N d N O 00 0� Cn _ a N � E s N N o 3 �o a �- w o Z L Z U O W ti L > CD M N V N Q (a Z N J a. C N E w City of EDMONDS a Design Review September 9, 2024 FOR PLANNING DEPT USE ONLY RENDERED ELEVATIONS SCALE: AS NOTED A301 Packet Pg. 39 �-b,Aw = % f►' Qa �•ins .t I -- ��— - - • - •_. =r -- - � ,axis..: 1*4-7 •"tea ,� . ••ter Ilia: '.,�► ter: �iiNIHNr��.r; .,� �`.•.� or. - - F 1»:l8 f\ ■ �:F.�..z • a_ 46 ii saw.. it•- ��. �. r •,. .�.. ,. .. ;,..2y�. Ir. 10 Vl'• -'r' .. �.»�. � � "'�� ., ;. �.�.: •fir ."�• .' .. . . o r FOR PI Ln Z C:) L) REI ry scar LL M a p � • 4 j ' I' l ` I ow- ,' t %e IU -.._Tza� y-- _ � �Ai- •.--1:� :�-•t --fir a_ llWVMT/IMytyl91l2moll] u■u191191:910111:1 Do- FOR PI v J Z C:) L) REI ry scar LL IM 3 s�f�C -t Momw ` rc ssaw arrrrtaw 'Isa♦f�if. sw os �rsas L Pi—Or-Fi 1 • �� `' rstllpas� 4*7 fir;•` _ -r� - _ �� -Ws � : i.� f.\ A s mm__ =i✓�i _+�-��6f S•� A air-a>•ww �• Via. a—,-�a.�a�,. _ -- .� s-yam li�` w+ r r . -ow A 4 .1` - -_ -_- Via•. A !"Fi :i.`IIII I ••self:+ - li�wv .a_ _a�.s1 • sus• rc:I s �resx-sYa�tr s ai V� I Z 't.. TIr -a .� __ pit -- �A• � taw - a_ • * �i . I ai r . t :.. _ t r �' .. , r - ei _ S du _ . sa Ar aea . i e > ,t ! •_ .: f►f�r ,'� �. �ar f F] FOR PI v J Z CHj C:) L) STL ry scar LL n II. • LANDSCAPE NOTES: 1. PLANT MATERIAL SHALL CONFORM TO MOST RECENT AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK FOR PLANT SIZE AND CONDITION FOR SPECIFIED MATERIAL. PLANTS WILL BE INSPECTED WHEN THEY ARRIVE ON SITE TO VERIFY THEY MEET NURSERY STOCK STANDARDS 2. PROVIDE MINIMUM 12" DEPTH PLANTING SOIL OVER SCARIFIED SUBGRADE IN ALL PLANTING AREAS. 3. PROVIDE MINIMUM 2" DEPTH MULCH IN ALL PLANTING AREAS. 4. LANDSCAPE PLAN IS SCHEMATIC. ADJUST PLANTS IN THE FIELD AS NEEDED TO AVOID CONFLICTS. EXISTING SEWER LINE TO REMAIN TYPE I LANDSCAPE AT REAR LOT LINE. DUE TO EXISTING SEWER LINE, MIX OF MOSTLY EVERGREEN LARGE AND MEDIUM SHRUBS PROVIDED IN LIEU OF TREES /. I I EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED. I I I SEE TREE RETETION AND 1 I PROTECTION PLAN I I + + o°o°o o°o°o p • • • v � � 1 a � 'g � � IP I I V .V ' . ..p a '. p' v • p . aQ � '• � � .d p '• v �� Q '.p ° O - VS •� .S �'1.—. L ,III '— � gyp' a. T. �'—:I� —'—/ O :v—'� a-—a�-•—�p= v' .�—p� a:. o. ° � ... .. •a p �. n I r- I I: .�. \ a a' a I •p. a. d. .� I p aQ. V aR pvo •. p' v I p I.al I •. p p'D D1D ��DD ; d 9D-�DjLD.'• d•'. V v pp.` .. a -1. o. / I I I i V : � • I,' a' I i.i V p, . I . • .a�: Q V I O : Q .. p.. �.' a. � v p• p : p� I .. a w. �o d p •!'a . I I � I ,p. a... I . I °I II..p,p •. •v'' �N " ' pI•°I • I� .I.. a°I... gip. �. .° .. .. �—' �.. 4r /'°°' ql•• I•. a• . p vv . ,.•a • . ,� ... o .p "I -----�- - - - - - - - - - f� I I v J. / / I •/•pp p l ib p •C p"\.. .Ia. 1 4p / .1. ./ a,•.\'' .vb• q Q .o vI v v �p ..p ■ .a p'�v I I / / I �tpa �• .°/ I. �. �. q v\ '.\ p •/. I Iv .o ��'• Q p. v. .I' .p ..� v ', � v I -j-A p v' .a/. V p \. p\v v v. •.I v•pi. I: Q •.a. .: 9'a P j a v p ,Q •q o L- J / .. I yy.a • V.e ---I ------1---------------- d "°---�-_Jr` p � r--_--------------O O ° ° ' v' TYPE III LANDSCAPE AT NORTH LOT LINE / 3 v , .. .. P v O O O O O O a I I �/ III�i p�.l a': 'p ;� p� I O O oo° o° � :a b I e I I I pva. ,pvtip`.a•p� ..I.1. .p :�. �{II �. . I ---IIII ----- I ----------- O O �O0 O W p. II --------I ---------- I • p.: ..� pavv.pIl( .. � I O 0 d ❑ 0 O vA .. ' �III II It / I I I II p.33f v �• I1v .. vI. I v c 'v �� :I' v• a: •�I I � .� •yv y v.• I I I I p. •, F .v' .. Q�• . / i I I I i � 3 '�• � � • �• a.ilp • `'• � • . ! .°• p a I I i I L-4-------------- ' p 0 COMBINED TYPE IV ------- CAPE AND TREET LANDp REESPLANT PLANTING ATCo •II P •.. v I �--� LOT LINE I I I--------1— Ir-------- .• V•-- v 3 I v Ip V N I II• r--I---------------� p p p v q .. i I I '> v I I p as .p 'I v� p.'. v I dv 9 •. °�. I O O O 0�0 Oo cl ... .' p -------I--------�-- i 3° I p I, ' p.:v __________- 0 O 00000 I �' 9• .v a v Ip' p/. O 0Or, II II II I II I v ' / �., .p "•iI �. ./..� b.lL � 00 �0 O OOOO�CU �a ti ./va3blI Pl. O° o •v• I I // I I I ."a'•II... .•. va ,pa .. a : ' . W WWWSWW- • am �5' HT PRIVACY FENCE EXISTING TR TEE 0 BE ALONG ENTIRE LENGTH REMOVED. SEE TREE I REAR LOT LINE. RETENTION AND SEE DETAIL SHEET L-2 PROTECTION PLAN ti 1 LAN DSCPE PLAN Y + 1 1- ///w TYPE III LANDSCAPE AT SOUTH LOT LINE z:�:T =:TiNowle 1° =10,4' • PLANTING SCHEDULE: TREES OTY BOTANICAL NAME O O LO 000 0 0 COMMON NAME SIZE/REMARKS EVER- GREEN NATIVE 4 ACER CIRCINATUM VINE MAPLE 8' HT MIN, TREE FORM NO NO 5 Of THUJA PLICATA HOGAN' HOGAN'S WESTERN RED CEDAR 6' HT MIN YES YES 3 ACER GINNALA 'FLAME' AMUR MAPLE 1 13/4" CALIPER NO NO LARGE SHRUBS (6'+ ht at maturity) OTY BI�Z4�•41I.Q,L—NAME _ _ -LOMM-ON_ NAME S17F/RFMARKS EVER— GREEN NATIVE 2 RNUS SERICEA RED TWIG DOGWOOD 1 #5 CONT, 18" HT MIN NO YES 4 CEANOTHUS 'VICTORIA' CALIEORNIA LILAC #5 CONT, 18" HT MIN YES NO 45 MAHONIA AQUIFOLIUM TALL OREGON GRAPE #2 CONT, 18" HT MIN YES YES 2 MYRICA CALIFORNICA PACIFIC WAX MYRTLE #5 CONT, 18" HT MIN YES YES 2 PHILADELPHUS LEWISII MOCK ORANGE #5 CONT, 18" HT MIN NO YES MEDIUM SHRUBS (3.5'-6' ht at maturity) OTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME S17F/RFMARKS EVER- GREEN NATIVE 32 GAULTHERIA SHALLON SAAAL #2 CONT, 18" HT MIN YES YES 8 VIBURNUM DAVIDII DAVID VIBURNUM #2 CONT, 18" HT MIN YES NO SMALL SHRUBS (G3.5' ht at maturity) OTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME S17F/RFMARKS EVER- GREEN NATIVE 24 LAVANDULA HIDCOTE ENGLISI #1 CONT SEMI NO ANGUSTIFOLIA 'HIDCOTE' LAVENDER PERENNIALS, GRASSES, FERNS, AND GROUNDCOVERS OTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE/REMARKS EVER— GREEN NATIVE 96 ARCTOSAPHYLOS KINNIKINNICK #SP4, 24" O,C. SPACING YES YES UVA—URSI WHERE SHOWN AS HATCH 18 DESCHAMPSIA TUFTED #1 CONT NO YES CESPITOSA HAIRGRASS 6 POLYSTICHUM WESTERN SWORD #1 CONT YES YES MUNITUM FERN W z �I a� rn o a'Qr14 � � N N c6 r- N O I- cn N STATE OF WASHINGTON REGISTERED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT R AN D. LAMBERT CERTIFICATE NO. 1190 O N 0 00 N Q N � N U) U) z 0 0 Z o OW LU W Q W o C,e) N N N W ' a J W9W. . W WWWW WWWWWWWW- ✓ W W Wp W W-+WWWWr-WWW WWWWW- O° °O° vp vI I a� I I J I I � W I \`QSI j I I I Q I U o 7 � L U J cn Z O () DATE:7/2/2024 SCALE: 1" = 10' U- SHEET # 0' 10, 20' 1--- L-1 T a' M N (V N CD 0 M N O N z J IL D d F� N d Cn _ d S V fC w cu 3 O Q d ti CD O M N 0 N z J a _ d t V a Q Packet Pg. 43 NOTES: 1) MULCH COMPLETELY BETWEEN ALL PLANTS. 2) STAKE TREES 5' IN HEIGHT OR GREATER ONLY. 3) PLANT SO THAT TOP OF ROOT BALL IS EVEN WITH FINISHED GRADE. 4) COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL WIRE AND LOOSEN FABRIC ON BALLED & BURLAPPED PLANTS. 5) SCARIFY SIDES OF PLANTING PITS PRIOR TO BACKFILLING. 6'-0" PINE STAKE DRIVEN TO REFUSAL INTO UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE, MINIMUM 24" DEPTH. STAKE LOOSELY 2' ABOVE FINISH GRADE, TYPICAL. BACKFILL PLANTING PIT WITH TOPSOIL, WATER, AND TAMP TO REMOVE AIR POCKETS. FINISH GRADE, 2" BELOW ADJACENT PAVING SOIL PREPARATION PER LANDSCAPE NOTES, SHEET L-1 6" SCARIFIED SUBGRADE UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE 2 X ROOT BALL DIA. TREE PLASTIC TIE (TREES ONLY) 2" DEPTH MULCH. INSTALL TOP OF MULCH FLUSH WITH ADJACENT PAVING. KEEP MULCH AWAY FROM TRUNK. FORM SAUCER WITH 3" HIGH CONTINUOUS RIM. NOTES: 1) MULCH COMPLETELY BETWEEN ALL PLANTS. 2) PLANT SO THAT TOP OF ROOT BALL IS EVEN WITH FINISHED GRADE. 3) COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL WIRE AND LOOSEN FABRIC ON BALLED & BURLAPPED PLANTS. 4) SCARIFY SIDES OF PLANTING PITS PRIOR TO BACKFILLING. I I Q BACKFILL PLANTING PIT WITH TOPSOIL, WATER, AND TAMP TO REMOVE AIR POCKETS. FINISH GRADE, 2" BELOW ADJACENT PAVING TREE PLANTING DETAIL NOT TO SCALE 2 METAL POST PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF 5/4 CEDAR TO COVER POST 8'-0" TYP --- — IVIIIN. 5' PRIVACY FENCE DETAIL NOT TO SCALE 2x6 TK CEDAf T^�^" SLOPE TO DR 5/46 TK CE COVER POST (FRONT AND I 5/4x6 TK CE FINISH GRADE MASTER HALC, POSTMASTER STEEL POST SECTION SHRUB/ GROUNDCOVER PLANTED AT NURSERY LEVEL. 2" MULCH. INSTALL TOP OF MULCH FLUSH WITH ADJACENT PAVING. KEEP MULCH AWAY FROM TRUNK. SHRUB OR GROUNDCOVER AT TIME OF PLANTING. GROUNDCOVER OR SMA SHRUB SPACING, SLE- PLANT SCHEDULE. SHRUB & GROUNDCOVER PLANTING DETAIL NOT TO SCALE 3 ■mw TYPICAL PLANT SPACING NOT TO SCALE UJ z �I 00 a� m o << � � N N m Q0 I- N O I- cn N STATE OF WASHINGTON REGISTERED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT R AN D. LAMBERT S/\6/0 CERTIFICATE NO. 1190 O N O 00 m N Q N 3�: N rn 0 U) z o 75 Z 0 O CO w Q L 0 N N N U) J_ Q L r) 0 Z Z 0 Z U n H cn Z 0 () DATE:7/2/2024 ry 0 LL SHEET # H z L-2 Packet Pg. 44 IRRIGATION NOTES: 1. IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS. 2. LAYOUT IS DIAGRAMMATIC AND MAY REQUIRE FIELD ADJUSTMENT PER DIRECTION OF THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. ANY DISCREPANCIES IN THE PLANS SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE IMMEDIATE ATTENTION OF THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE BEFORE WORK PROCEEDS FURTHER. ADJUST PLACEMENT OF IRRIGATION LINES AS NECESSARY TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH TREES, LIGHT FIXTURE FOUNDATIONS, AND OTHER APPURTENANCES. 3. INSTALL DRIPPER TUBING ON SURFACE OF FINISH GRADE PRIOR TO PLACING MULCH. SECURE DRIP TUBING WITH TECHLINE CV STAPLES, ONE EVERY 36". INSTALL TWO TECHLINE CV STAPLES AT ALL DRIPPER TUBING CONNECTIONS. I IRRIGATIONPLAN IRRIGATION LEGEND: IRRIGATION SLEEVE, 4" SCHEDULE 40 PVC - — — — — — - MAIN LINE, 1" SCHEDULE 40 PVC LATERAL LINE, 1" SCHEDULE 40 PVC DRIPPER TUBING, NETAFIM TLCV4-18 tlN MANUAL DRAIN VALVE, 1" CHAMPION 20ORS-075 QUICK COUPLING VALVE, BUCKNER QB5 LRC-10 COUPLER © IRRIGATION CONTROLLER, RAINBIRD ESP-TM2 4-STATION CONTROLLER POINT OF CONNECTION 0 GATE VALVE, 1" HAMMOND MODEL 667 MASTER CONTROL VALVE, 1" RAINBIRD GB SERIES AUTOMATIC DRIP CONTROL VALVE, NETAFIM SERIES 80 4 VALVE LVET.75GH2 W/ NETAFIM FILTER DF075-140 p MANUAL LINE FLUSHING VALVE, NETAFIM TLFV-1 1" = io'-o" j JAL LINE FLUSHING VALVE ;AL XHUAST HEADER ',AL,1/2" MIN RAL LINE ')UPPLY HEADER 'ER TUBING,18" O.C. TYPICAL. 'LAN FOR LAYOUT. OFFSET AETER DRIPPER TUBING 4" 1 ADJACENT CURBS, :WAYS, AND BUILDING DATIONS. AUTOMATIC DRIP CONTROL VALVE TYPICAL DRIP LAYOUT NOT TO SCALE ad a0. a V � 'o ao I I OTOT I IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT SHOWN OUTSIDE OF PLANTING BED -FOR CLARITY ONLY. LOCATE -ALL IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT -WITHIN PLANTING BEDS. I TO IRRIGATION SYSTEM MASTER CONTROL VALVE MANUAL DRAIN VALVE QUICK COUPLING VALVE BACKFLOW PREVENTER ,,-- GATE VALVE SERVICE LINE FROM METER POINT OF CONNECTION DETAIL NOT TO SCALE III %A =1I F z j\/\\\ z \\\ \\\ \\ N COMPACTED BACKFILL LATERAL LINE MAIN LINE CONTROL WIRE MAIN AND/OR LATERAL LINE PIPE TRECH NOT TO SCALE IRRIGATION SLEEVE NOT TO SCALE VERTICAL I NSTALLAT O N 77, 0 rr i� 'r r' r i . r r i MP %A NO HKIIHER THAW EXIST GROUND a' To CENTER CIF u SHUT OFF vA,LVE r r TEST DOCKS WITH PLUGS IRESILENT SEATED (4 RE0'0) SHUTOFF VALVES 1(2 REO'D) ' (TYP) }D m a r ® 0 2 UNIONS REO'D Z 2 UNIONS REQ'D / PLASTIC OR CEMENT J , 0 METIER BOX NOTES; SIDE VIEW 1, APPROVED DOUBLE CHECK VALVE ASSEMBLY TO LAY HORIZONTAL WITH GROUND 2, DESIGNED FOR BACK SIPHONAGE AND BACK PRE99URE 011AVEL 3. TEST COCKS TO EITHER FACE OUTWARDS OR UPWARDS FROM ASSEMBLY (12' MIN) 4. ALL TEST COCKS MUST BE PROVIDED WITH PVC PLUGS 5. THOROUGHLY FLUSH LINES PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF BACK FLOW PREVENTER 8, THE DCVA CAN BE INSTALLED ABOVE OR BELOW THE GROUND PROVIDED ALL CLEARANCES ARE MET 7. DO NOT INSTALL IN AN AREA SUBJECT TO FLOODING 8. MUST BE PROTECTED FROM FREEZING COI�ITIONS 9. THE BACK FLAW PREVENTION ASSEMBLY MUST BE A WA84NOTON STATE APPROVED MODEL 12' M N 10. IF INSTALLED INSIDE A BUILDING THE DOVA SKALL BE INSTALLED N0 HIOHER THAN 5 FEET FROM FROM F_ OCR FLOOR TO CA OF ASSY AND A MIN OF 12 INCHES FROM FLOOR TIO BOTTOM OF ASSY IF INSTALLED IN A VERTICAL CONFIGURATION, ASSY MUST BE A MINIIAUM OF 12 INCHES FROM i FLOOR, AND NO HIGHER THAN S FEET FROM FLOOR 10 C/L OF #2 SHUT OFF VALVE *ONLY ABSY WITH APPROVAL FROM WADOH MUST BE TESTED AFTER INSTALLATION AND YEARN THEREAFTER BY A WASHINGTON STATE CERTIFIED SACKFLOW ASSEMBLY TESTER. THE TEST REPORT MUST BE SENT TO THE CITY OF EOMONDS WATER D MSION RESIDENTIAL DOUBLE REVISION DATE JANUARY sole CITY OF EDMONDS CHECK WALVE ASSEMBLY STANDARD `. PUBLIC WORKS (STANDARD DCVA 2" & SMALLER) DEPARTMENT DETAIL WAS 1 40 APPRQVED Bl: R. ENOLISH BACKFLOW PREVENTER DETAIL NOT TO SCALE PAVING AND BASE COURSE, SEE CIVIL GRAVEL BORROW, COMPACT TO 95% MAX DENSITY COMPACTED SUBGRADE SLEEVE CONTAINING IRRIGATION PIPE(S) CONTROL WIRES Ln W z� (1) rn CD < < Q0 0 rn C r--i (V I\ fV fV m r- OJ O r- N fV ■�+jWw ■ CLoe — L � �aF_ w E z= STATE OF WASHINGTON REGISTERED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT R AN D. LAMBERT I /J/'�A CERTIFICATE NO. 1190 0 N O 00 N Q N 3�: N In 0 07 z 0 Z O W G Lu W Q Ll 0 CM N N N DATE: 7/2/2024 SHEET # I R-1 Packet Pg. 45 REVISION 1 1 8/16/2024 I I ^ J I ti I H PROPOSED REPLACEMENT TREE, TYPICAL 77 I \ � I �s I ■ / I Ir l I I II ti / y I 1 II I■ I \\ I I I N \ I I I I \ I I I I I I N I I I I I I I II � ti I I -- y -- i -- — N I 11 II I II i � /rL L I I ti I I I q l l I I /■ I I III I/ I I ii i II Ili � y I II I i lid �� ti I II I I I TREE 1:15.5" DBH CHERRY (PRUNUS SP.) GOOD CONDITION 16' AVERAGE CANOPY RADIUS TO BE REMOVED (3) REPLACEMENT TREES REQUIRED � \ � S S S S S S —D D �D D —��--—L--� --- V ... ° P. ° V — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — ° 4 Cl / �. �°.Q'' �. cD\ � �D� PDI.°IT��ID �. ° D. 9, ,Da PD�� .. Q v �P � _ .. v°. �, I I I a IMP I I P a a. I I°ol a.. -----�----------4 ° o v v. •P P ° ..P � ■ ° °.I° .I° v ofI P I I I a I .P ° V IL—---------- I I v v P l r— 1— — — — - - - - - - - - - - - o I --------7------- i /° P v P� � it II ° I I ■ a I I I I I 3 I DI�'I ° I I I \ ■� o � e . ° I .I V. IP L - ■ P a ti. °. .. ° p. Ir3 .I 'v 11°v'v d o/ r--r---------------- ----------------�—ILLss I I a I'. . P v I P. a o s I s a a o u II I ' Ii I I i 3a:II°: Ia? a I � ° a I 3 I °JoT oT I L — — — — III I I I I ■■ ■■ML■ ■■I I I y/ III o I I II � II II I I TREE 2: 9" DBH (CHERRY (PRUNUS SP.) POOR CONDITION 8' CANOPY RADIUS TO BE REMOVED (1) REPLACEMENT TREE REQUIRED I I TREE RETENTION AND PROTECTION PLAN 1" = io'-o" I I I I I I I I I I I� SCALE: 1" = 10' 0' 10' 20' PROPOSED REPLACEMENT TREE SCHEDULE NUMBER SCIENTIFIC NAME 4 � THUJA PLICATA 'HOGAN' TREE REPLACEMENT: COMMON NAME SIZE NATIVE? ON EDMONDS TREE LIST? HOGAN'S WESTERN RED CEDAR 1 MIN. 6' HEIGHT YES PER ECDC 23.10.060.C(5), DEVELOPING PROPERTIES THAT HAVE "FEWER THAN THREE SIGNIFICANT TREES, TREES SHALL BE RETAINED AND/OR PLANTED THAT WILL RESULT IN THE SITE HAVING AT LEAST THREE TREES, WHICH WILL BE SIGNIFICANT AT MATURITY, PER 8,000 SQUARE FEET OF LOT AREA." LOT AREA = 10,890 SF 10,890/8,000 X 3 = 4 REPLACEMENT TREES REQUIRED PLANTING NOTES: 1. SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR PLANTING NOTES AND DETAILS YES Ln W 00 N Ql N > rl Q Q3�: •-R C -00 00 a o I- cn N E� W w ■ CL ile �a� w Ezm Q L—— J Q U) 0 a' Lu Q LL M ul J Q N N �Nej v ' DCD T CD d Q*z O M W C J cn z cavil m 'N a N N V) Ln I Q Q Co z Lu d J u- W I W Lu of W C a � orUCn aNi a N cn d S V fC w 3 O N Q- C 0 N Q N N o U) z O Q N O Z Q N O Lu J a W a Q I_ W V M Q N N N 0 Q Q z I OZ � O z w �-- �-- U w Lu ry �-- w O w ry DATE: 7/2/2024 SHEET # T-1 Packet Pg. 46 Tree Report 222 3rd Ave S. Edmonds Updated August 16, 2024 Updated text in italic. Prepared For: Bukowski Read Enterprises Prepared By: PO Box 1478 Edmonds, WA 98020 augustus.bukowski@cardinalfinancial.com Overview 7724 WA 98 russell Seattle, WA 98115 15 lambert 206.898.6312 AR N O S C E ARCHITECTUU RE Russell + Lambert Mary Ellen Russell WA Landscape Architect #1149 ISA Certified Arborist #PN-9215A ISA Tree Risk Assessment Qualified (206) 898-6312 maryellen@russell-lambert.com I performed level 2 Basic Tree Risk Assessments with a five-year time frame for existing trees 6" or greater measured 4.5' from the ground (DBH) located at 222 3rd Ave S, Edmonds on May 1, 2024. DBH measurements were taken using a diameter tape rounded to the nearest half inch. Where site conditions limit access diameter was estimated using a standard measuring tape. For multi -stem trees the diameter was averaged by taking the square root of the sum of the squared diameters of each stem This report summarizes details of the assessments below. Tree Condition Categories This report categorizes tree condition as 'Good', 'Fair', or 'Poor'. 'Good' indicates that a tree has no evident significant structural defects or disease concerns and has good form for the species and typical vitality. 'Fair' indicates that the tree may have minor to moderate structural defects that are not expected to contribute to a failure within the next five years, minor disease or pest concerns, an asymmetric or unbalanced crown, or less than normal vitality. 'Poor' indicates that the tree has significant conditions of concern which are likely to cause a failure within the next five years such as major structural defects, disease or significant pest concerns, decline due to old age, evidence of decay at the roots, severely overextended branches, sparse or abnormal foliage, or very low vitality. Trees in 'Poor' condition may or may not be classified as high -risk trees depending on the size and location of the tree and the likelihood of impacting a target in the event of a failure. Condition was not assessed for off - site trees. Existing Trees There are (2) existing trees on site with a DBH 6" or greater. There are no existing street trees at the site. There are no trees located off -site that have driplines extending onto 222 3rd Ave S. There are no groves at the site. Russell + Lambert Page 1 of 3 Tree Report 222 3rd Ave S, Edmonds Packet Pg. 47 Tree Map Yam' Tree Table Tree No. Scientific Name Common Name On/ Off Site DBH Canopy Radius Critical Root Zone Radius Condition Hazard YIN Viable YIN Nuisance YIN 1 Prunus sp. Cherry On site 15.5" 16' avg. 16'-8" Good No Yes No 2 Prunus sp. Cherry On site 9" 8' 9A.5" Poor No No Yes Specific Tree Notes Tree 1 has an off -center canopy toward the southwest. Cherries are short-lived trees prone to disease and decay. This specimen has little indication of disease for its size and age. Tree 2 is in poor condition. It is located extremely close to the existing garage and is growing in conflict with the eave. There is extensive die -back in the canopy and many branches are resting on the roof of the garage. It is low risk due to the small size of the tree but it is not a viable tree. Tree Replacement Both significant trees at the site are slated for removal as part of a redevelopment project. There are no trees nearby that will be affected by the removal of trees 1 and 2. I coordinated with the project team to explore alternate site layouts with the goal of retaining tree 1. Infiltration test results show that the area around tree 1 is the only potential location for required infiltration facilities at the site. See the Drainage Report for more information. Excavation to install the drainage facilities cannot feasibly be accomplished while retaining tree 1. Per ECDC 23.10.060.C(5), developing properties that have "fewer than three significant trees, trees shall be retained and/or planted that will result in the site having at least three trees, which will be significant at maturity, per 8,000 square feet of lot area." Russell + Lambert Page 2 of 3 Tree Report 222 3rd Ave S, Edmonds Packet Pg. 48 Lot area = 10,890 SF 10,890/8,000 x 3 = 4 replacement trees are required. Minimum sizes for replacement trees shall be 1.5" caliper for deciduous trees or 6' height for evergreen trees. Each replacement tree should be supplied with (1) slow -release watering bag and watered during the dry season for the first five years. Limit of Liability The terms and evaluation forms used in this report are as laid out in the International Society of Arboriculture Tree Risk Assessment Manual, Second Edition. The tree evaluation is a Level 2 Basic Assessment as defined by the International Society of Arboriculture. As conditions change, it is the responsibility of the property owners to schedule additional site visits by the necessary professionals to monitor the long-term health and risk of the tree. There are many conditions affecting a tree's health and stability which may be present and cannot be ascertained such as root rot, previous or unexposed construction damage, internal cracks, stem rot and more. Changes in circumstances and conditions can also cause a rapid deterioration of a tree's health and stability. Adverse weather conditions can dramatically affect the health and safety of a tree in a very short amount of time. While I have used every reasonable means to visually examine the tree, this evaluation represents my opinion of the tree health at the time of the evaluation only. I make no warranties about tree condition. These findings are estimates only, and do not guarantee future safety, nor are they predictions of future events, nor do they insure that a tree will not fail. This tree evaluation is to be used to inform and guide the property owner in the management of their trees. This in no way implies that I am responsible for performing recommended actions or using other methods or tools to further determine the extent of internal tree problems. Furthermore, my recommendations do not in any way insure that a tree will not fail. Extreme weather conditions or hidden rot can cause even good condition trees to fail. If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, Mary Ellen Russell, PLA Principal, Russell + Lambert Landscape Architecture ISA Certified Arborist ISA Qualified Tree Risk Assessor Russell + Lambert Page 3 of 3 Tree Report 222 3rd Ave S, Edmonds w r Q E s �a a Packet Pg. 49 0 :. w W c� a z a r- W 3. o_ 10, 5' 0 10, 20' SCALE: 1 " = 10' KEY NOTES KEY DESCRIPTION DETAIL/ SHEET O 6" SSS @ 2.00% MIN - 6" SSSCO O RIM 35.40 SS-200 6" IE 32.00 NEW 6" SSS CONNECTION TO EX. 8" SEWER O MAIN W/ ROMAC SADDLE SS-202 EX 8" SS IE 22.00± 6" SDCO #1 O RIM 36.40± SD-619 #" IE 32.00 6" SDCO #2 O RIM 35.80± SD-619 #" IE 32.00 6" SDCO #3 O RIM 35.80± SD-619 #" IE 32.00 7 0 6" PVC SD CONNECTION TO RAINVAULT FROM DOWNSPOUT @ 2.00% MIN - RAINVAULT DETENTION VAULT 570 SF (57.0' L X10.O'WX6.66'D) O FIG 35.70± - FACILITY TOP ELEV 34.30 FACILITY BOT ELEV 27.64 RAINVAULT INFILTRATION FACILITY 560 SF (3.00' D) FIG 44.08-44.91 ± O2" IE 442.75 DRAIN ROCK TOP ELEV 43.58 - TOP RAINVAULT 42.75 BOT RAINVAULT 41.34 DRAIN ROCK BOT ELEV 40.58 10 2" SD FORCE MAIN - 11 NOT USED - 48" SDMH STORMWATER PUMP STATION W/ VANED GRATE RIM 36.35 12 0 6" IE (NW) 33.80 OVERFLOW 18" IE (S) 27.64 2" IE (E) 33.50 SDFM SUMP 24.64 (TO BE VERIFIED BY PUMP MANUFACTURER) 13 6" PVC SD EMERGENCY OVERFLOW @ 1.00% - MIN 4'X2' ROCK LINED DISPERSION PAD W/ 14 QUARRY SPALLS IE 33.20 15 0 (5) 1" WATER SERVICES & CONNECTIONS TO 8" Cl WATER MAIN (TYP) 16 (5) NEW 1" WATER METERS WA-130 1" PE PIPE WATER SERVICE (FROM METER 0 0TO BUILDING W/ 14 GA. VINYL COATED WIRE TRACER TO BE GROUNDED AT BUILDING) (TYP, MEP TO CONFIRM SIZE) 18 G WATER SERVICE POINT OF CONNECTION TO BUILDING - 19 15' SEWER EASEMENT (CENTERED ON EX 8" SEWER MAIN) CB TYPE 1 20 RIM 35.70 SD-303 6" IE (E) 31.00 6" SSCO 21 RIM 36.40± - 6" IE 33.80 0BUILDINGS 0 TO BE FULLY WATERPROOFED PER GEOTECHNICAL. NO FOOTING DRAINS - 6" SSSCO 23 RIM 36.95 - 6" IE 31.50 24 6" IE 31.85 - 25 NOT USED - 26 18"SD@0.00% - 27 24'-WIDE DRIVEWAY TR-541 28 9'-WIDE CONCRETE SIDEWALK TR-531 29 NOT USED - PROPOSED UGP SERVICE TO BE 0 COORDINATED W/ SNOHOMISH COUNTY PUD - (UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT) PROPOSED COMM SERVICE TO BE 31 COORDINATED W/ UTILITY PURVEYOR - (UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT) 32 FUTURE UNIT LOT LINE (TYP.) - LEGEND: SAN.MANHOLE ° RIM = 29.91 FT. I.E.=19.96FT. 4 CONCRETE ASPHALT \ PAVER WALKWAY I / I ROOF SURFACES, SEE DRAINAGE REPORT FOR DESCRIPTION OF I I DELINEATED HARD SURFACES I I I I LANDSCAPE I / WATER NOTES: I I I I I � II Lo 1. EXISTING DOMESTIC WATER METER TO BE pp I I I EXAMINED BY CONTRACTOR FOR CONDITION I AND SIZE AND MAY ONLY BE REUSED IF 1" I I I I 2. UNDERGROUND WIRING TO BE DESIGNED BY I I ELECTRICIAN. I I I I GENERAL UTILITY NOTES. I I II I � III 1. ALL UTILITY SERVICES SHALL BE PLACED II I I I I UNDERGROUND. I I I I I 2. MINIMUM SEPARATION BETWEEN SEWER I I I AND STORM PIPE CROSSING IS 6". ALL I I I p CROSSINGS MEET MINIMUM SEPARATION. 3. ALL FINAL RESTORATION RESULTING FROM I I I I I p THE INSTALLATION OF UTILITIES IS TO BE I I p I I I COMPLETED BY THE CONTRACTOR. I I (n II 4. MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 3' HORIZONTAL I I I I I SEPARATION (ON -SITE) & 5' HORIZONTAL I I SEPARATION (IN ROW) BETWEEN DRY I I I I / UTILITIES (GAS, POWER, ETC) AND WET I I I UTILITIES (WATER, SEWER, AND STORM). 5. MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 10' HORIZONTAL I I I I SEPARATION BETWEEN WATER AND SEWER I I I I LINES.18" MIN SEPARATION BETWEEN WATER I I I AND SEWER LINES. 18" MIN SEPARATION SHALL BE APPLIED FOR WATER/SEWER I CROSSINGS, IN WHICH WATER SHALL CROSS W I I I I OVER SEWER AND SEWER SHALL BE I� I I I ENCASED FOR A MINIMUM OF 10 LF ON I I I I I I EITHER SIDE OF CROSSING. I 6. SIDE SEWER MUST MAINTAIN A 2.00% MIN cn SLOPE. IF PIPE SLOPE EXCEEDS 20% THE PIPE MUST BE ANCHORED. 7. UTILITY PATCHES SHALL BE COMBINED AND FULL WIDTH OR HALF WIDTH OVERLAY MAY BE REQUIRED DEPENDING ON THE EXTENT OF DISTURBANCE. WHERE UTILITY PATCHES FALL ENTIRELY WITHIN ONE TRAVEL LANE, THE OVERLAY SHALL EXTEND INTO BOTH TRAVEL LANES, A FULL WIDTH OVERLAY IS REQUIRED. 8. A SEPARATE FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR EACH UNIT. 9. PRIVATE PROPERTY OWNER(S) SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL CLAIMS FOR INJURIES AND DAMAGE DUE TO THE OPERATION OR NON -OPERATION OF THE PUMP SYSTEM. SAN. MANHOLE RIM = 32.91 FT. I.E. = 22.55 FT (S. TO CLEANOUT) I.E. = 21.87 FT (N.W./MAINLINE) (FALLS 370.8 FT. N. OF CLEANOUT) FENCE FALLS 0.2 FT. SOUTH OF DEED LINE AT THIS LOCATION FENCE FALLS 0.4 FT. SOUTH OF DEED LINE AT THIS LOCATION BLDG . nl In AI"1 /1A1//"1rr rl lIAT rl r\/A TI/"IA Ifs SAN. MANHOLE RIM = 43.14 FT. I.E. = 38.04 FT. (FALLS 80.0 FT. NORTH OF SHOWN POSITION) CATCH BASIN RIM = 4 FT. \ I I.E. = 40.75 .75 FT. (FALLS 80.0 FT. NORTH OF SHOWN POSITION) cn 30' c cn o (57" W 30.0 I FOUND TACK IN LEAD OFFSET 4.2 FT. EAST AND 0.3 FT. SOUTH OF CALC'D CORNER POSITION � 30' 0 I 44 07 APPROVAL FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDMONDS 9 I p p J Lu _ ¢ Q Ow0 W U � � Z Z ¢ OLu Z Z w 0 CD = Q p O Z N (If p = O Of C/3 � Lu>- CDcn c-) U p z U Z p J p of O � J o z O a_ CDC � O O U:) p m O d Q p ~O p Lu W U Lu Z C= p ZU Lu ¢ u" a-O LL Q =rCD = U Z O s CD = X p U U Lu Z d U Q Qor EL O � p �w�U3 w m J cn Q Q m J o N z C C) J o N N r Lq m O c N � d � lu a W J Q w Z O Z W Z 0 0 .l Z �Q W Y z co � - M Y a' a o �_� M CD J Cfl , ca W G� a> W cncn cn ,1 ° I WA c co I L �A� -13 �O 54904 TOSS ONAL ECG\ CALL 811 2 BUSINESS DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG (UNDERGROUND UTILITY LOCATIONS ARE APPROX.) 0 N C 00 a� cn Q w � o a o 06 Z o M 0 N W N PERMIT PLAN CIVIL SITE PLAN DATE: 9/6/2024 PLAN NUMBER: N m I1L`111111I IYA CITY ENGINEERING DIVISION col SHEET 1 OF 3 j Packet Pg. 50 Ao!i � 10, 5' 0 10, 20' SCALE: 1" = 10' KEY NOTES KEY DESCRIPTION DETAIL/ SHEET OREPLACE EX SIDEWALK TO NEAREST JOINT AND MATCH EG - 2O MATCH EX TOC AND FL (TYP) - O EX CONTOUR (TYP) - O CONCRETE RETAINING WALL - O PROPOSED CONTOUR (TYP) - 1� W '; c m M Q N W cNv Z o CD co co cold CN o Q M N O m M o N W Lu 7 CD a 'a cnM U H W (� O W a C> Lu x N m z O J a a U a o CU J Z W � a 10+23 10+30 55 50 w iX 35 30 10+23 10+30 10+40 10+50 10+60 10+70 10+80 10+90 11+00 11+10 11+20 11+30 11+40 11+50 11+60 11+70 11+80 11+90 12+00 J +0 P STU4146000 J a PVI = K 0.58 Z) LVC 10.00' Q O U) o Ln o m (=) 0 0 0 Lu v v L U � U U co U W EG T DRIVEW Y FL co w PVI STA 11+ 7.41 c� PVI EL 35.89 K0.81 -- _ --- -- -, --- LVC 15.00' _ - 0 -2.00 CB TYPE 1 uo N mu ti F FG AT DRIVEWAY FL STA 10+70.41, -1.20' LT M co M o W �_ Lu o�o /so RIM 35.73 (n m N w m - w 9 FM RAINV ULT Sp, -- ---- saFM INFILTRATION - - - 99 ---_ __ /�� VAULT .00% -0.49% 0.51 % SOFM SpFM 2" SD FORCE MAIN STORMWA ER 14 PUMP STATION (SEE C01) RAIN 'AULT DETENTION VAULT (SEE C01) LEGEND: a d d CONCRETE ASPHALT PAVER WALKWAY ROOF SURFACES, SEE DRAINAGE REPORT FOR DESCRIPTION OF DELINEATED HARD SURFACES W LANDSCAPE BLD G . 10+40 10+50 10+60 10+70 10+80 10+90 11+00 11+10 11+20 11+30 11+40 11+50 11+60 11+70 11+80 11+90 50 30 12+00 N I- 00 O O CO Lo O O N Lo m O - Lo 00 co I` m - M co O c0 O Il It Lo Co Lo O CO 00 u� 00 M I` 7 I` 00 Il c0 r c0 Lo Ln N M V7 O) - w I- 00 7 CO M N -7 00 I� 0 00 u') 00 u')co Lo co u') I- Ln I- Lo I-.-L6 ci (6 00 O -,t N � M It `t It`t � 1�t -t 0 co W co M M M M M M co co co co co co co co co co 't It I It Nt It It It � N u- 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0 00 00 00 00 00 00 W W IL W W W u- W W W u- W u- W u- W u- W W u- W IL W IL W IL W IL W IL W cn I � DRIVEWAY GRADING PROFILE SCALE: H.: 1" = 10'; V.: 1" = 5' FENCE FALLS 0.4 SOUTH OF DEED THIS LOCATION DG. SAN. MANHOLE I FENCE FALLS 0.2 FT. RIM = 29.91 FT. SOUTH OF DEED LINE AT I.E. = 19.96 FT. I THIS LOCATION 3 \ ASPHALT / / � \ \ ASPHALT cn \ w ` 7„ w - I 4 W, a D FG �7DcoD �T.FG36.30 FG 37.43G 43.89Quj v MSFG 44.55 °FG 32.40 FG 32.50 ssS'JS ssS °SSS d /to SS s8 d '"' Co' d FG 35.90 a N a o d d SD M SDFM DFM SDrI< W W d I I I I I I 0.71%11+ 0.51%I 19.05% d 11 5 7.00' 7.51' - 1.70% 4 I I d ° 42.58' 20.00' I I -------- _a d FG37.71 FG44.01 M - FG 35.85 I . °o d ° a ICN d O. ° y W N 4 O .p d co "' NI d 5 �l------ --I I I - I I ° 0)O d FG 36.50 FG 44.06 d,Ns00BUILDING 2 - - - - --- GROUND FLOOR=35.9 7 <�I FG 33.10 FG 33.20 I d U) I I UGP - Id I .I I M M CI - - - - - - - - - - d a - - - - - - I a I FG 35.90 FG 35.70 °U) I FG 36.50 I v Iw I 4.69% I I I 7 00 a 17.05' .. z w w I a-- d cod Icwn-------- J BUILDING 1 I I = -co - SECOND FLOOR=46.7 d J - GROUND FLOOR=36.5 II I I I ` I /�On/� I 0) "Zt ,1:d co a d II V/ I I I W - - - - -- - - - O a N _ - - - - - - - - - - I O JI d -f I Z' d I I I W W I I O .d 4 l ---- FG35.90 a4 9 a FG35.84 I - .I.a 4 y 0.86% . 3.88% I FG 33.90 FG 34.00 7.00 �- 17.00' c+� -FG 35.94 %A Iy 4.66% I 30.5CID �o 00 0' v v v co co 88' 43S 57" �I II ' ASPHALT LTI� CHAINLINK FENCE FALLS 0.4 FT. SOUTH OF CALC'D CORNER POSITION M N + r I FG36.50_----J -co MIM FG 44 O-r- N. CM El I I 11 cn c i I III 8°4 57" W - - 30.0 - I - �FG 44.65 2 I a V� TOC 44.55 ° FG 44.57 d I � FG 44.22 I TOC 44.17 12 00 - �-- FG 44.35 o FG 44.32 I O c ° TOC 44.30 4 I d w a !I. -..GP.'. ......... 11 P �mM .. �jG...:.�-UGP UGP.. a�................... I cy) Lo d 0 a I o 2 00 I w ih d p 1 FG 44.92 a I Z aI co 0 W. I I G W....... ..W........fN.........vv ...................:.. l . ......................... ...... ..................... W .W.........W ...... .Vll.........W .. - W ....... . . . . . . . . . vv. . . . . . ..VY. . . . co + acy)� da 88 '57" � - - 30.00' - - - � I I I I ASPHALII I \A I X� � � 1 CHAINLINK FENCE FALLS 0.6- FT. SOUTH OF DEED LINE AT FOUND TACK IN LEAD THIS LOCATION BLDG . OFFSET 4.2 FT. EAST AND 0.3 FT. SOUTH OF CALC'D CORNER POSITION W cn 0 APPROVAL FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDMONDS DATE: BY: CITY ENGINEERING DIVISION u cnJ Lu _ ¢ Q Lu w p U o = ¢ o C) c z Z a O � � o = o U) S? w � O 9wL!=oF`- 1 U J t: z O O O O c=i3 O Lu O =mom o CS W U Z cn Lj Q z U w = � ¢� ��u--� �>: z�o °O of of co O �" � LJJ Z W pp ¢ Lu z o Qof uo= L,, J J Lu co �,mQ o m¢ z N co ,=,o cn N Co C N � d Z W a 2 W J H W N Z 0 Z W Z 0 0 W � Y Z co > a 45 M ai a co W Ir-- d d) cn ch LWi SWIN J. /O OF WAsy�N�i�s A,co T�2 L A �0 54904 v� RFG/STER�� SS/ONAI E� CALL 811 2 BUSINESS DAYS UNDBEFORELYOUADIPGoX ) 0 N C co 5 cn U.1 Q ILU Qocm Z � o M M qr 0 0 N W N PERMIT PLAN DRIVEWAY GRADING PLAN Packet Pg. 51 0 STORMWATER PUMP SPECIFICATIONS SUBMERSIBLE STORMWATER GENERAL DESCRIPTION PUMP 1.5 GPM @ 17.87' TDH (BASED ON FORCE MAIN DIAM. AND LENGTH DESIGN FLOW & TDH PER PLAN DOUBLED TO ACCOUNT FOR MINOR LOSSES) MINIMUM SOLIDS HANDLING 3/4" MIN PER MANUFACTURER'S PUMP EFFICIENCY RECOMMENDATIONS OPERATING RANGE PUMP ELECTRICAL SINGLE PHASE PUMP CONTROLS PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS PUMP MOUNTING & DISCHARGE PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS DISCHARGE MANIFOLD PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS FORCE MAIN & FITTINGS 2" (USED FOR TDH CALCS) PER MANUFACTURER'S CONTROL/FLOAT SPECIFICATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS NOTES: 1. THESE SPECIFICATIONS ARE SCHEMATIC IN NATURE AND SHALL BE CONFIRMED BY THE SUPPLIER AND CONTRACTOR. 2. PUMP FLOATS/CONTROLS AND DISCHARGE VALVES SHALL BE FIELD TESTED AND ADJUSTED TO ACHIEVE DESIGN FLOW AND OPTIMUM PUMP CYCLE TIMES PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. 3. DUPLEX PUMP STATION REQUIRED. 4. EMERGENCY ON -SITE AUTOMATIC BACKUP POWER (GENERATOR) REQUIRED. 5. PUMP TYPE (GRINDER, EJECTOR, EFFLUENT, ETC.) AND AVAILABILITY SHALL BE VERIFIED BY CONTRACTOR THROUGH SUPPLIER PRIOR TO INSTALLING FORCE MAIN. ADDITIONALLY, CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY PUMP CAN UTILIZE SINGLE PHASE POWER VERSUS REQUIRING THREE PHASE POWER SOURCE. :. STORMWATER PUMPS TO BE BARNES MODEL BP314 OR APPROVED EQUAL 6" CONCRETE BLOCK - A STORMWATER PUMP DUPLEX SYSTEM REQUIRED j 1l ll� • r FLEX COUPLING CB, MH OR OTHER BASIN PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATION FLEX COUPLING A FORCE MAIN PER PLAN PUMP DISCHARGE FITTINGS TO CONNECT TO FORCE MAIN PUMP GENERAL NOTES: POWER/CONTROL CABLES INLET PIPE DIAMETER & INVERTS PER PLAN PVC FLEXPIPE SS LIFT CABLE 6" CONCRETE BLOCK 1. PUMPS SHALL BE SPECIFICALLY DESIGNED FOR THE APPLICABLE USE (E.G., DRAINAGE DISCHARGES OR WASTEWATER DISCHARGES) USING THE PUMP MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDED OPERATING GUIDELINES. 2. NO MORE THAN ONE PROPERTY SHALL BE CONNECTED TO ANY PUMP SYSTEM, INCLUDING THE FORCE -LINE. 3. A DUPLEX PUMP SYSTEM IS REQUIRED FOR MULTI -UNIT BUILDINGS AND COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE CITY OF EDMONDS. 4. PROJECTS WHICH PROPOSE PUMP SYSTEMS AND ARE LOCATED WITHIN A DESIGNATED GEOLOGIC HAZARD AREA MAY BE SUBJECT TO ADDITIONAL SIDE SEWER AND GEOTECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS PER CITY OF EDMONDS. 5. THE DISCHARGE PIPE (FORCE -LINE) SHALL HAVE A NON -CORROSIVE CHECK -VALVE, A "QUICK -RELEASE" CONNECTOR/FITTING, AND A NON -CORROSIVE GATE -VALVE TO FACILITATE PUMP REMOVAL. THE PIPE SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM INSIDE DIAMETER OF TWO -INCHES FOR INJECTOR PUMPS, ONE -AND -ONE QUARTER -INCHES FOR GRINDER PUMPS, OR THREE -INCHES FOR DUPLEX PUMP SYSTEMS, OR PER MANUFACTURER RECOMMENDATIONS. THE DISCHARGE FORCE LINE SHALL BE PVC SCHEDULE 40 OR SCHEDULE 80 OR DUCTILE IRON OR AS APPROVED BY THE SITE INSPECTOR. DUPLEX PUMP STATION A NTS Q03 CONTROL PANEL ON PEDESTAL OR NEARBY BUILDING WALL OR MH (IF REQUIRED) CONNECT LIFT CABLE TO SS HOOK/BRACKET RIM ELEV PER PLAN SS STRAP/SUPPORT AS NECESSARY SST EXTENSION HANDLE REQUIRED FOR DISCHARGE DEPTHS 2'-0" OR ' ; * ,: .:�. �::.. •�: _ GREATER FROM TOP OF BASIN SST EXTENSION BRACE REQUIRED FOR USE WITH EXTENSION HANDLE BRASS GATE VALVE CPL 6. FORCE -LINE SECTIONS OF PIPE ARE REQUIRED TO HAVE "PIG PORTS" FOR THE FOLLOWING TWO CONDITIONS: A. A MAXIMUM OF 100 FOOT INTERVALS; AND B. WHEREVER FITTING BENDS TOTAL 1350 . 7. THE PUMP SHALL BE INSTALLED IN A CHAMBER THAT IS READILY SERVICEABLE. THE TANK SHALL BE MADE OF NON -POROUS, NON -CORROSIVE, STRUCTURALLY SOUND MATERIAL SUCH AS PLASTIC, FIBERGLASS, STAINLESS STEEL, OR CONCRETE. IF A CONCRETE TANK IS USED, A FIBERGLASS REINFORCED PLASTIC OF POLYURETHANE HYBRID POLYMER RESIN OR EQUIVALENT SHALL BE INSTALLED IN THE CONCRETE CHAMBER. THE LINER MAY BE CAST INTEGRAL WITH THE PRECASTING OF THE MAINTENANCE HOLE OR FIELD ASSEMBLED AND SEALED IN THE PRECAST CONCRETE SECTIONS. 8. PUMP SYSTEMS SHALL BE DESIGNED AND INSTALLED TO PROVIDE EASY ACCESS FROM THE GROUND SURFACE TO ALL MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL DEVICES. 9. AN EXTERNAL AUDIBLE ALARM SYSTEM IS REQUIRED FOR THE HIGH-WATER LEVEL INDICATOR AND SYSTEM FAILURE. 10. AN ELECTRICAL PERMIT MAY BE REQUIRED FOR AN ELECTRICAL HOOKUP OF A PUMP IF A NEW CIRCUIT IS REQUIRED FOR THE PUMP. - FLEX COUPLING 12" PVC BALL CHECK VALVE W/ CLEANOUT PVC UNION PVC DISCONNECT UNION AND ADAPTER/TRANSITION FITTINGS AS NECESSARY APPROVAL FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDMONDS 00 J _ ¢ Q uj m W U � � Z Z < OU C5 N Z Z w ooer cf) Of�zU-:,� Lu o wR 1 U 0 z U Z o O Of J o z O =�8o o� w� om_ o ��c�Lu N W U W Z C= � Wo z ~ " u� � oLQ U Z Of cn O° ��(D O w Z O W ¢ w z o Quo= W J co Lu m J U) m O z N C) 9 z o c.i J o N N r L m cc M= a � W lu a � W J a W z 0 Z W Z 0 0 jl � W co Z a Y z � - M Y a' a M d -J Cfl , W CCW cn cn cn ,1 ° I WA c co 0 549()4 \v TOSS ONAL ECG\ CALL 811 2 BUSINESS DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG (UNDERGROUND UTILITY LOCATIONS ARE APPROX.) 0 N 0 00 a� cn Q Wcfi O � o a o 00 Z o M 0 N W N PERMIT PLAN DETAILS mr, ■E N m Z O J U d o U J Z w � a I1L`1111111I IYA CITY ENGINEERING DIVISION Packet Pg. 52 Date: To: From: Subject: MEMORANDUM October 17, 2024 Tristan Sewell, Planning Division Jeanie McConnell, Engineering Division PLN2023-0071—Design Review Edmonds 222 — 222 3rd Ave S Engineering has reviewed the subject application and found the information provided is consistent with Title 18 Edmonds Community Development Code & Engineering standards. Compliance with Engineering codes and construction standards will be reviewed with the building permit application for development of the site. Approval of the design review phase of the project does not constitute approval of the improvements as shown on the submitted plans. The following summarizes the engineering division design review analysis for the subject project. 1. The subject development is required to provide complete frontage improvements per City standards and ADA requirements. A new sidewalk with street trees will be installed along the property frontage. 2. Water and Sewer Availability Certificates were completed indicating both water and sewer systems are available and able to serve the proposed development. Specific development requirements will be determined with future building permit. 3. A preliminary transportation impact analysis was submitted. A complete fee mitigation compliance review will be completed with future building permit. 4. The project design includes a driveway slope greater than the standard limit of 14%. The applicant submitted a slope waiver request, consistent with ECDC 18.80.060.D, to allow for up to a 20% slope, which is the maximum allowed by code. This request has preliminarily been approved by Engineering, Fire and Police. Staff will continue to work with the applicant during review of the future building permit to minimize the slope as much as possible. 5. The stormwater management system will need to comply with weight and point load ratings as required by the Fire Department. 6. A preliminary stormwater plan has been submitted to the City to confirm project feasibility. Stormwater management shall be provided consistent with Edmonds Community Development Code Chapter 18.30 and the 2019 DOE Stormwater Manual. Refer to Stormwater Addendum, Appendices and Checklists for additional information. 7. The trash hauler has indicated staging of trash bins within the parking lane of 3rd Ave S is acceptable on pick-up day; however, this will need to be reviewed further during the building permit phase of the project so impacts to on -street parking are minimized. Thank you. Packet Pg. 53 SOUTH COUNTY FIRE 12425 Meridion Ave S., Everett WA 98208 tel (425) 551-1200 • fox (425) 551-1249 www.southsnofre.org City of Edmonds Department of Fire Prevention PLANNING REVIEW COMMENTS Date: 11-03-2023 Prepared by: Chris Burt These comments are based on preliminary project review only and subject to change. An actual plan review will occur after a building permit has been submitted. Project Name: Edmonds 222 Townhomes Plan Number: PLN2023-0071 Location: 222 3rd Ave S Proposed Occupancy Group: Residential (Town homes) PERMIT APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS ❑x Indicate that the correct address and suite designations will be posted on the building(s). (Ref: IFC Section 505) ❑x A fire lane is required. See fire lane handout and make all necessary notations on the plans. Buildings greater than 30' require a 26' fire lane. Buildings less than 30' require 20' fire lanes. (Ref. SCF Fire apparatus access road standard, IFC Section 503) See comments noted below. ❑x An approved fire sprinkler system is required. This system must meet the requirements of NFPA 13D. See ECDC 19.25.035 ❑x Deferred Submittals Required ❑x NFPA 13D Fire Sprinkler Systems FIRE COMMENTS: 1. A fire lane is required for the north drive isle, that runs east and west from 3rd Ave N. "FIRE LANE NO PARKING" signs would be required on both sides of the drive isle. 2. NFPA 13D sprinkler systems are required for each townhome unit. 5 separate permits are required, 1 for each unit. 3. Include a fire service civil plan when submitting civil plans. This plan should include the fire apparatus access road width, grades, turning radius, FIRE LANE - NO PARKING sign locations, water line placement. SERVING SOUTH SNOHOMISH COUNTY • BRIER • EDMONDS • LYNNWOOD • MOUNTLAKE TERRACE Page 1 of 2 Packet Pg. 54 SOUTH COUNTY FIRE 12425 Meridion Ave S., Everett WA 98208 tel (425) 551-1200 • fox (425) 551-1249 www.southsnoflre.org City of Edmonds Department of Fire Prevention South County Fire Standards link Fire Prevention Standards I South County Fire (southsnofire.org). NOTE: All required fire hydrants, water supplies, and fire department access roads shall be installed and made serviceable prior to any construction, in accordance with Sections 501.4 and Chapter 14 of the 2018 International Fire Code. Standpipes shall be installed and made serviceable as required by chapter 905 of the 2018 International Fire Code. Disclaimer: These comments are intended to assist you with designing your proposal prior to submitting it for permitting. They are intended to identify any "fatal flaws" with your proposal as well as aspects of your proposal that require clarification or further analysis They are based on a brief, informal review of the plans and other information (if any) that were submitted to schedule your pre - development meeting. However, these comments are not based on a complete review of your proposal and they are not intended to identify all code -compliance issues. The complete review will occur following submission of your complete application, and additional concerns, issues or required revisions may be identified at that time. Chris Burt Deputy Fire Marshal Fire Prevention Services 12425 Meridian Ave S Everett Wa 98208 Cell: 425-327-5800 W a� E s Page 2 of 2 SERVING SOUTH SNOHOMISH COUNTY • BRIER • EDMONDS • LYNNWOOD • MOUNTLAKE TERRACE I Packet Pg. 55 of E°"(oti CITY OF EDMONDS � v p 121 5t' Avenue North, Edmonds WA 98020 Phone: 425.771.0220 • Fax: 425.771.0221 • Web: www.edmondswa. _goy PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • PLANNING DIVISION %90 July 23, 2024 Jacob Young, Citizen Design Via email: jyoung( ,collaborateiveco.com SUBJECT: NOTICE OF COMPLETENESS FOR YOUR DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION LOCATED AT 222 3" AVE. S FILE NO. PLN2023-0071 Dear Mr. Young: Thank you for submitting additional information regarding your general design review application located at 222 3rd Ave. S on July 5th, 2024. Your application (File No. PLN2023- 0071) is now considered complete pursuant to Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) 20.02.003(E). Please accept this letter as notice that the application meets the procedural submission requirements and therefore is complete as of July 20th, 2024, pursuant to ECDC 20.02.003(A). The City will issue a Notice of Application pursuant to ECDC 20.03.002 within two weeks and r request comments from adjacent property owners and taxpayers. The Notice will also be published in The Everett Herald, posted at City Hall and the Public Safety Building, and available on the City's website. I will also install a small blue project notification sign onsite. r Comments will be accepted for fourteen days from the date the Notice is published (ECDC f° 20.03.002(C)L5)). 3 Although staff determined that the application meets the procedural submission requirements and is therefore complete, additional information may be needed as review of the application continues (ECDC 20.02.003(C)). Staff will contact you if additional information is necessary. I will be the main staff contact for your application. If you have questions at any point during the review process, you may reach me at 425-771-0220 or via email at tristan. sewellgedmondswa. gov. Sincerely, Tristan Sewell Planner Cc: File No. PLN2023-0071 Page I of 1 Packet Pg. 56 CITY OF EDMONDS NOTICE OF DEVELOPMENT �.� APPLICATION AND COMMENT PERIOD NAME OF APPLICANT: Jacob Young DATE OF APPLICATION: October 16, 2023 DATE OF COMPLETENESS: July 20, 2024 DATE OF NOTICE: August 2, 2024 FILE NO.: PLN2023-0071 PROJECT LOCATION: 222 3rd Ave. S PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Application for General Design Review for five townhouses. The site is zoned Multifamily Residential (RM-1.5) REQUESTED PERMIT: Design Review by Architectural Design Board - Type III -A. Information on this application can be viewed at the City of Edmonds Planning & Development Dept., 121 5tn Ave. N, Edmonds, WA 98020, or on the City's Online Permits website via the QR code above. Search for PLN2023-0071. OTHER REQUIRED PERMITS: Associated building permits REQUIRED STUDIES: TBD EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL CRA2022-0130 DOCUMENTS: COMMENT PERIOD: Comments are due by August 16, 2024, at 4:30 pm. Any person has the right to comment on this application during the public comment period, receive notice and participate in any hearings, and request a copy of the decision on the application. The City may accept public comments at any time prior to the closing of the record of an open record pre -decision hearing, if any, or, if no open record pre -decision hearing is provided, prior to the decision on the project permit. Only parties of record as defined in ECDC 20.06.020 have standing to initiate an administrative appeal. CITY CONTACT: Tristan Sewell, Planner (425) 771-0220, Tristan. Sewell@EdmondsWA.gov PUBLISH: August 2, 2024 Packet Pg. 57 City of Edmonds PLN2023-0071 0 138.68 277.4 Feet 206.5 This ma is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is for 2,47$ p B p pp B reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accurate, WGS_1984_Web-Mercator _Auxiliary -Sphere current, or otherwise reliable. © City of Edmonds THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION a 15 4 1(-4 Legend 13 ReZones PRD RoW Zoning ■ RS-6 RS-8 RS-10 RS-12 © RSW-12 RS-20 RS-MP RM-3 ■ RM-2.4 . RM-1.5 RM-EW 13131 N BD2 N 13133 13134 BD5 +\ OR WMU ® BP ■ BN FVMU BC Notes 222 3rd Ave. S General Design Review Packet Pg. 58 1 File No.: File No.: PLN2024-0071 Applicant: Jacob Young General Design Review DECLARATION OF MAILING On the 2nd day of August 2024, the attached Application for General Design Review was mailed by the City as prescribed by Ordinance to property owners within 300 feet of the site that is the subject of this application. I, Heather Lakefish, hereby declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that the foregoing is true and correct this 2nd day of August 2024, at Edmonds, Washington. Signed. ' Packet Pg. 59 File No.: PLN2024-0071 Applicant: Jacob Young General Design Review DECLARATION OF POSTING On the 2nd day of August 2024, the attached Notice of Application and Request for Public Comment was posted at the subject property, Civic Hall, Library and Public Safety buildings. I, Tristan Sewell, hereby declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that the foregoing is true and correct this 5th day of September 2024, at Edmonds, Washington. Signed: Packet Pg. 60 .nC NAME OF APPLICANT DATE OF APPLICATION DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING DATE OF NOTICE: FILE NO.: PROJECT LOCATION CITY OF EDMONDS NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Jacob Young October 13, 2023 December 9, 2024 November 22, 2024 PLN2023-0071 222 3rd Ave. S PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Application for general design review of five multifamily residences per Chapter 20.10 ECDC. The site is zoned Multifamily Residential (RM-1.5). REQUESTED PERMIT: Design Review - Type III -A decision by the Architectural Design Board. Reviewed under the criteria of ECDC 20.11.030. View application materials on the City's website by using the QR code above or at www.EdmondsWA.gov/DevelopmentNotices, or in person at the Planning & Development Dept., 121 5t" Ave. N. OTHER REQUIRED PERMITS: Associated building permits EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL CRA2022-0130 DOCUMENTS: PUBLIC HEARING: 6 pm on Monday, December 9, 2024 Brackett Room, City Hall, 121 5th Ave. N Or join the Zoom meeting at: https://edmondswa- gov.zoom.us/j/88959586932?pwd=RzdPWUlwM09PZ1k1MHN2e WM1YXphZz09 Or via phone by dialing (253) 205-0468 Meeting ID: 889 5958 6932 Password: 591531 CITY CONTACT: Tristan Sewell, Planner (425) 771-0220 Tristan. Sewell@EdmondsWA.gov PUBLISH: November 22, 2024 T a� a M N N N ti O 0 M N O N Z J a 2 a) o_ c .y a� 0 a� E r CU 3 0 a d o_ ca Cn ti 0 0 M N O N Z J a w a� E 0 2 a Packet Pg. 61 City of Edmonds PLN2023-0071 0 138.68 277.4 Feet 206.5 This ma is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is for 2,47$ p B p pp B reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accurate, WGS_1984_Web-Mercator _Auxiliary -Sphere current, or otherwise reliable. © City of Edmonds THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION a 15 4 1(-4 Legend 13 ReZones PRD RoW Zoning ■ RS-6 RS-8 RS-10 RS-12 © RSW-12 RS-20 RS-MP RM-3 ■ RM-2.4 . RM-1.5 RM-EW 13131 N BD2 N 13133 13134 BD5 +\ OR WMU ® BP ■ BN FVMU BC Notes 222 3rd Ave. S General Design Review Packet Pg. 62 1 File No.: PLN2024-0071 Applicant: Jacob Young General Design Review DECLARATION OF POSTING On the 22nd day of November 2024, the attached Notice of Application and Request for Public Comment was posted at the subject property, Civic Hall, Library and Public Safety buildings. I, Tristan Sewell, hereby declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that the foregoing is true and correct this 22nd day of November 2024, at Edmonds, Washington. Signed: Packet Pg. 63 File No.: File No.: PLN2024-0071 Applicant: Jacob Young Notice of Public Hearing DECLARATION OF MAILING On the 22nd day of November 2024, the attached Notice of Public Hearing was mailed by the City as prescribed by Ordinance to property owners within 300 feet of the site that is the subject of this application. I, Heather Lakefish, hereby declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that the foregoing is true and correct this 22nd day of November 2024, at Edmonds, Washington. Signed: Packet Pg. 64 Legal Invoice Sound Publishing, Inc. Unit Attn: A/R PO Box 930 Everett WA 98206-0930 Bill To: City of Edmonds Development Services Attn Debbie Rothfus 121 - 5th Ave N Edmonds WA 98020-3145 Legal Description: City Applications Desc: PLN2023-0071 NOTICE Ordered By: MICHELLE MARTIN Issues Ordered: 1 FEE EIV'`�K DEC 02 20214 DEVELON;-AT SEFMCi CGUNTER Date: 11/22/2024 Everett Daily Herald Customer Account #: 86031703 Legal Description: EDHI005598 Legal #: EDHI005598 Ad Cost: $ 55.04 Published: Everett Daily Herald Start Date: 11/22/2024 End Date: 11/22/2024 Due: $ 55.04 Please return this with payment. Questions? Call 1-8004854920 City of Edmonds Development Services Account #: 86031703 Attn Debbie Rothfus Invoice #: EDHI005598 121 - 5th Ave N Edmonds WA 98020-3145 Due: $ 55.04 Packet Pg. 65 Everett Daily Herald Affidavit of Publication State of Washington } County of Snohomish } ss Michael Gates being first duly sworn, upon oath deposes and says: that he/she is the legal representative of the Everett Daily Herald a daily newspaper. The said newspaper is a legal newspaper by order of the superior court in the county in which it is published and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of the first publication of the Notice hereinafter referred to, published in the English language continually as a daily newspaper in Snohomish County, Washington and is and always has been printed in whole or part in the Everett Daily Herald and is of general circulation in said County, and is a legal newspaper, in accordance with the Chapter 99 of the Laws of 1921, as amended by Chapter 213, Laws of 1941, and approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of Snohomish County, State of Washington, by order dated June 16, 1941, and that the annexed is a true copy of EDHI005598 PLN2023-0071 NOTICE as it was published in the regular and entire issue of said paper and not as a supplement form thereof for a period of 1 issue(s), such publication commencing on 11/22/2024 and ending on 11/22/2024 and that said newspaper was regularly distributed to its subscribers during all of said period. The amount the fee fors h publication is $55.04. Subscribed and sworn before me on this \\��tttllllitlt�� 2 day of M o t/ \� P O SP/C'i�.. Sion kW,- 9 :6 ��pTARY •: (� = tr PUB1 �G 0): Notary Public in and for the State of 0F W P`SN�r`�\\\ Washington. f I1 I I I1 Cily of Edmonds Dhvelopnwnl Smrviocs 186031703 MICHELLE MARTIN Packet Pg. 66 Classified Proof CITY OF EDMONDS NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NAME OF APPLICANT: Jacob Young DATE OF APPLICATION: October 13, 2023 DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: December 9, 2024 DATE OF NOTICE: November 22, 2024 FILE NO.: PLN2023-0071 PROJECT LOCATION: 222 3rd Ave. S PROJECT DESCRIPTION Application for general design review of five multifamily residences per Chapter 20.10 ECDC. The site Is zoned Multifamily Residential (RM-1.5). REQUESTED PERMIT: Design Review - Type III -A decision by the Architectural Design Board. Reviewed under the criteria of ECDC 20.11.030. View appllcallon materials on the City's website by using the QR code above or at www.EomondsVVA.gov/DevelopmentNotices, or In person at the Planning & Development Dept., 121 51h Ave. N. OTHER REQUIRED PERMITS: Associated building permits EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL CRA2022-0130 DOCUMENTS: PUBLIC HEARING: 6 pm on Monday, December 9, 2024 Brackett Room, City Hall, 121 5th Ave. N Or join the Zoom meeting at. https7/edmondswa- gov.zoom.usrj/889595869327pwtl=RzdP WUIwM09PZ1 kl MHN2e WM lYXphZz09 Or via phone by dialing (253) 205-0468 Meeting ID'. 889 59586932 Password: 591531 CITY CONTACT: Tristan Sewell, Planner (425) 771-0220 Tnslan.Sewell@Edmonds WA.gov Published: November 22, 2024. EDHI006698 Proofed by Pospical, Randie, 11/22/2024 08:36:30 am Page: 2 Packet Pg. 67 From: Laurel Anderson To: Sewell, Tristan Subject: Disappointed Date: Friday, August 16, 2024 4:14:28 PM IYou don't often get email from anderson.l.laurel@gmail.com. Learn why this is important Hello, Thanks for chatting & educating me on "design review" comment periods. Although my comments don't pertain to the particular "design" of the townhouses, I will be affected for a number of reasons in which I feel compelled to share. Feel free to share my comments with pertinent parties. I am disappointed in this recent development. I live directly across the street & my mountain and partial ocean view will no longer be a view after construction is complete. This diminishes my property value and quality of life, as I deeply love where I live. I also work from home a majority of the time, and do not have a local office I can go to, and construction noises for likely over a year will not work for me. I am now in a position where I may be forced out of my home. I also have concerns about parking, as there is already limited street parking available. I am extremely disappointed by this project and will no doubt lose my quality of life, the peace and tranquillity that comes from living in Edmonds, and will suffer financially. I was crushed to receive the communication on this new development. Thank you. - Laurel Anderson 206.779.5479 U) r Q E s w r Packet Pg. 68 O Helen M. Jolly August 8, 2024 Mr. Tristan Sewell City of Edmonds Planning Department 1215th Avenue North Edmonds, Washington 98020 Re: File No. PLN2023-0071 222 3`d Avenue South, Edmonds, WA Dear Mr. Sewell: First of all, thank you for providing me a copy of the above -captioned permit. I am a co-owner with my husband of a condo unit across the street, so am very interested in the development of the property. After perusing the permit, I gave the permit to our homeowner association president, as this development will obviously affect all of the owners in our building. I am writing to "comment on the application". I was told by another neighbor that she was told the property was "grandfathered", by which I think she meant it was restricted as to how it could be developed. I realize the property is zoned multi -family, so the proposed redevelopment plan would certainly qualify, but my question is: is the property itself actually restricted. If so, how. Could you please check this out and let me know. r I am also requesting to be considered a "party of record". Please notify me (and our homeowners f° president noted below) of any hearings and/or decisions on the permit. 3 Yours ve41enM. truly, Hly cc: Caleb Tingstad Seabrook Homeowners Association President 533 Alder Street - A2, Edmonds, WA 98020 Edmonds, Washington 98020 phone: 425-775-2293 / cell: 206-954-6893 Packet Pg. 69 From: Gary Neuman To: Sewell, Tristan Cc: JOANNE NEUMAN; Doug Nelson; Ellie Lana; Kelly Humann; BARBARA POMEROY Subject: Comment on CRA2022-0130 Date: Saturday, August 31, 2024 12:46:35 PM IYou don't often get email from garyneuman@gmail.com. Learn why this is important Hello Tristan, My wife and I were traveling in Africa for several weeks and returned to find the Notice of Development which is of great concern to us. We live at 229 3rd Ave S, Apt 202 which is across the street from the proposed development. We currently have a direct line of sight to the Puget Sound from our windows and balcony. We purchased this property for our home mostly due to the view and location.The proposed development will totally obscure our view so we are very much against this project as designed. Again, we were away for the short comment period indicated on the notice and upon return struggled to find the details of the development plans. I finally tried the QR code which took me to the list of items and then to the actual plans for 222 3rd Ave S. I find that the notice period which corresponds directly with summer vacation times is quite unfair. The notice was published on 8/2 (not sure when we actually received it as we were away) and a comment period bending 8/16. Two weeks during the summer is insufficient for people to comment. This project will benefit Jacob Young at my expense as my view and property value will be directly impacted. I do not think that the City of Edmonds wants to harm one property owner for the benefit of another so I demand that this project be declined or severely modified so as not to eliminate my view. w r I am copying my neighbors who may have missed the details of this notice as they too will be impacted and their = Q property value reduced. E s V I demand to have my say and look for your earliest reply. I will also be contacting Mike Rosen to discuss this unfair r practice. c� Thanks Gary Neuman 925-980-0423 Packet Pg. 70 From: linda norton To: Sewell, Tristan Subject: Comment on PLN2023-0071 Design Review Date: Friday, August 16, 2024 11:20:38 AM You don't often get email from nortonlinda@hotmail.com. Learn why this is important Dear Planning Department, As a next -door neighbor of many years, I have loved this home and property at 222 3rd Avenue South. When I walk by it is a reminder of "home" and "country" that I treasure. I will miss the forsythia blooms each spring and the plum tree which hangs over the fence and provides a taste for the neighbors each summer. Do you know that the birds flock to the tree at the NE of the property and clear it of berries each fall? Occasionally, a bunny hops by. All this is to say I will mourn one of Edmonds' most charming properties, one which is worthy of preserving. As this proposed project heads to review, here are some concerns: 00M The setback does not appear to be in line with the neighboring properties, giving an intrusive feel to the pedestrians walking by. 000 There is a serious concern about the proposed lighting along walkways and the parking lot area, bright lights are not welcome in the middle of the night. 00M Even more, the overall design looks plain, one might say office/industrial, without charm or appeal. Just look at most of the buildings along this stretch and you'll see what I mean. Sincerely, Linda Norton and Dennis Trapp 224 3rd Ave S, Apt 201 Edmonds, WA 98020 Packet Pg. 71 From: Pam Tauer To: Sewell, Tristan Subject: PLN2023-0071 - Public Comment Date: Tuesday, August 6, 2024 12:03:17 PM Tristan, I am a neighbor of 222 3rd Ave S with windows facing south overlooking this property. I have performed an initial review of the application for General Design Review and have the following comments: I. Editorial statement - the house at 222 3rd Ave S was built in 1901 by one of the founding Edmonds families. It is a shame that it cannot be preserved in some way but I understand that is not possible. 2. The townhomes submitted are attractive and I appreciate that only 5 will be built. 3. There is a beloved and prolific 100+ year old cherry tree that is to be removed at the Northeast corner on 3rd Ave. As a member of the climate protection committee I would like to appeal that removal and ask that the developmenter preserves it. 4. There is a lot of pavement associated with the development. Is there a way to reduce and/or require/recommend that the pavement be permeable? I believe more plantings and larger ones are warranted if the existing design (pavement) is accepted. I am still reviewing and may comment again. In general, I understand the need for more o multi -family units although these will be very high -end and pricey. U) r Could you briefly outline the permitting steps after the General Design review approval. I E am curious if we are 1, 3, or 5 years out from building. w r Thank you, Tristan. Pam Tauer Packet Pg. 72 From: ztribeCalcomcast.net To: Sewell, Tristan; vienna zigalla Subject: Design review Comment_222 3rd Ave so. PLN2023_0071 Date: Friday, August 16, 2024 1:37:31 PM IYou don't often get email from ztribe@comcast.net. Learn why this is important Edmonds planning Department Tristan Sewell Design Review Architectural Design Board Comments to address: The number of buildings proposed overwhelms the lot with concrete. The hardscape vs landscape plan is not balanced for the environment or the neighborhood. A one building design would continue the historical character of the block and maintain a similar curb appeal in this older established neighborhood. Compare the site development and design of the adjacent buildings; 224 and 210 3rd 41 Ave south. Both have a similar number of units. Both include outdoor parking spaces E in the back of the buildings along with garages, view decks and dark sky compliant lighting. In addition, green spaces in the front, back and side areas. r The proposed grading/ site development plan and building design does not allow conventional access to the lower area for sewer maintenance, emergency services, waste management, guest parking, or an opportunity to achieve wheelchair accessibility standards. The turning radius of the motor court for 10 cars creates excess carbon monoxide fumes in an already tightly enclosed area. An unhealthy impact to the current residents living nearby and unbeknownst by the purchasers. The roof design does not fit the character of the street or the current height restrictions. (without the slope) The seagull droppings on the black metal roof color will be an eyesore year-round. In addition, the white vinyl color will reflect sunlight and create glare. Note the exterior design inside the motor court area. A lot of white shiny vinyl. Lastly, the impact of cars exiting building 224 safely, mandates a study of pedestrian safety. Packet Pg. 73 Please note the attached photo for reference. Please address meeting or exceeding ADA compliance. "One in four Americans lives with some sort of disability" Thank you in advance for your careful attention to an established community members concern. Vienna Zigalla 224 3rd Ave So. #102 Edmonds,Wa 98020 M r Q E s �a Packet Pg. 74 q OF EDA10 +a CITY OF EDMONDS NOTICE OF SEPA DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City of Edmonds has issued a Determination of Nonsignificance for the following project. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Application for general design review of two townhomes containing five dwelling units. The site is zoned Multifamily Residential (RM-1.5). General design review is Type III -A decision by the Architectural Design Board because the applicant proposed more than four dwelling units. PROJECT PROPONENT: Jacob Young DATE DNS ISSUED: November 22, 2024 PROJECT LOCATION: 222 3,d Avenue South SEPA COMMENTS DUE: December 10, 2024 APPEAL PERIOD: You may appeal this determination by filing a written appeal citing the specific reasons for appeal with the required appeal fee no later than December 17, 2024) by 4:30 PM. SEPA MATERIALS: Application materials are available at: www.edmondswa.gov/developmentnotices. Search for file number PLN2023-0071. These materials are also available for viewing at the Planning Division, located on the second floor of Edmonds City Hall, 121 5t" Ave N, Edmonds, WA 98020. CITY CONTACT: Tristan Sewell, Planner tristan.sewell@edmondswa.gov 425-771-0220 x1332 PUBLISH: November 26, 2024 Packet Pg. 75 a°V EIJ4 'Jti J J CITY OF EDMONDS 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH, EDMONDS, WA 98020 (425) 771-0220 DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Description of proposal: Application forge nera I design review of two town homes containing five dwelling units. The site is zoned Multifamily Residential (RM-1.5). General design review is Type III -A decision by the Architectural Design Board because the applicant proposed more than four dwelling units. U) d Proponent: City of Edmonds Q Location of proposal, including street address if an 222 3rd Avenue South p p g Y� r� Lead agency: City of Edmonds N The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse i impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW o 43.21C.030 (2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and N other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. (14 z The City of Edmonds has determined that the requirements for environmental analysis and protection a- have been adequately addressed in the development regulations and comprehensive plan adopted under chapter 36.70A RCW, and in other applicable local, state, or federal laws or rules, as provided by RCW 43.21C.240 and WAC 197-11-158 and/or mitigating measures have been applied that ensure no significant > a� adverse impacts will be created. c There is no comment period for this DNS. a .y d This DNS is issued after using the optional DNS process in WAC 197-11-355. There is no further o comment period on the DNS. ,n c X This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date below. Comments must be submitted by December 9, 2024. Project Planner: Tristan Sewell, Planner CU Responsible Official: Mike Clugston, AICP, Acting Planning Manager 3 Contact Information: City of Edmonds 121 5th Avenue North, Edmonds WA 98020 425-771-0220 a ca Date: November 22, 2024 Signature: o XX You may appeal this determination to Tristan Sewell, Planner, at 121 5th Ave. N, Edmonds, WA 98020, by filing a written appeal citing the specific reasons for the appeal with the required appeal fee no later than December 16, 2024. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact Mike Clugston to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. XX Posted on November 22, 2024, at City Hall, the Edmonds Public Safety Building, and Edmonds Public Library. Published in the Everett Herald. Uploaded to the Department of Ecology SAW. XX Distribute to "Checked" Agencies below. The SEPA Checklist, DNS, and associated documents can be obtained online at: https://www.edmondswa.gov/services/public involvement/public notices by searching for permit number PLN2024-0002, and by emailing the project planner(michael.clugston@edmondswa.gov), or by calling the City of Edmonds at 425-771-0220. Pagel of 2 SEPA DNS PLN2023-0071 11/22/24.SEPA Packet Pg. 76 Distribution List: This DNS and SEPA checklist were distributed to the following: ❑X Applicant ❑X Dept. of Ecology ❑ City of Everett ❑ Parties of Record ❑X Dept. of Ecology - Shorelands ❑ City of Lynnwood ❑X Dept. of Natural Resources ❑ City of Mountlake Terrace ❑X US Army Corps of Engineers ❑X Dept. of Commerce ❑ City of Mukilteo ❑X US Fish and Wildlife ❑X WSDOT ❑ City of Shoreline ❑ WSDOT — Ferries ❑X Town of Woodway © Puget Sound Energy © Snohomish PUD © Olympic View Water & Sewer ❑ Alderwood Water District ❑ Edmonds School District © Port of Edmonds © South County Fire ❑ Swedish Hospital © Community Transit pc: File No. PLN2023-0071 SEPA Notebook ❑X Dept. of Fish & Wildlife ❑ Dept. of Health — Drinking Water ❑X Snohomish Co. Public Works ❑X Dept. of Arch. & Historic Pres. ❑ Snohomish Co. PDS ❑ Dept. of Parks and Rec. Commission ❑ Snohomish Co. Health Dist. ❑ Puget Sound Clean Air Agency ❑ Puget Sound Regional Council ❑ Puget Sound Partnership ❑X Tulalip Tribe ❑ King County -Transit ❑ King County— Environ. Planning ❑ Other Page 2 of 2 SEPA DNS PLN2023-0071 11/22i24.SEPA Packet Pg. 77 OV EDAf O #P71 PLN2023-0071 St. 1 Purpose of Checklist. CITY OF EDMONDS ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST RECEIVEC Oct 13 2023 CITY OF EDMONDS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Use of checklist for nonproject proposals: For nonproject proposals complete this checklist and the supplemental sheet for nonproject actions (Part D). the lead agency may exclude any question for the environmental elements (Part B) which they determine do not contribute meaningfully to the analysis of the proposed nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Edmonds 222 Townhouses 2. Name of applicant: 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: 10 Dravus Street, Seattle, WA 98109 Attn: Jacob Younz 206.535.7908 4. Date checklist prepared: October 28, 2022 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Edmonds Q M N N N n 0 0 c� N 0 N Z J a D m c T d G w d E s ca w as 3 0 a a) w r O O M N O N Z J IL c a� E t a Revised on 9116116 Edmonds 222 SEPA Checklist Page I of 25 Packet Pg. 78 6. 7 8. 9. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Construction is expected to begin in the summer of 2023 and continue for approximately 12-18 months. No phasing is planned for this project. (STAFF COMMENTS) Design review by the Architectural Design Board scheduled for December 9, 2024. Subsequent Building permit applications therefore outstanding. Construction date no longer accurate, but duration likely remains unaffected. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No. (STAFF COMMENTS) List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. A geotechnical and soil infiltration study was performed by PanGeo in October 2022. A critical areas designation [CRA 2022-01307 was prepared by the City of Edmonds in September 2022. (STAFF COMMENTS) Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. None pending. (STAFF COMMENTS) U) Revised on 9119116 Edmonds 222 SEPA Checklist Page 2 of 25 Packet Pg. 79 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. In addition to desikn review and environmental review, the proiect will require several building permits, a demolition permit, a short plat and a right-of-way construction permit. (STAFF COMMENTS) Necessity and anticipation of a short plat for this multifamily residential development is unclear. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. The proiect consists of five townhouses in two buildings. All townhouses are to be three stories in height with attached, two -car garages. Two townhouses are to contain 2029f sf above -grade floor area [AGLAI and 500f sf garage area each, and three townhouses are to contain 1737f sfAGLA and 511f sfgaraQe area each. In addition to the townhouses themselves, the proiect includes a paved motor court, a driveway, walkways, onsite utilities including stormwater detention, and landscaping following sections for details. (STAFF COMMENTS) 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The proiect site is located at 222 3' Avenue S. This is in the southeast quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 23, Township 27 North, Range 3 East, Willamette Meridian. The subject parcel's legal description is as follows. See attached plan sets for maps. That portion of the SE'/ of the SE'/ of Sec. 23, T. 27N, R. 3E, W.M., described as follows: Be ig nning at a point 150 feet south of the SW corner ofDayton and Third Streets in the City ofEdmonds; Thence south along the west line of Third Street for 85 feet; Thence west 128 feet; Thence north 85 feet; Thence east 128 feet to the point of beginning. (STAFF COMMENTS) m Q L M N N N ti 0 0 M N O N Z J a as c a� d G r a� E s ca w 3 0 a d co r 0 0 M N 0 N Z J IL c a> E t �a r a Revised on 9119116 Edmonds 222 SEPA Checklist Page 3 of 25 Packet Pg. 80 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other: As described by the project geotechnical engineer, "Uhe existinggrade gently slopes down from about Elevation 45 in the east end of the site, to about Elevation 32 in the west end for an overall grade change of approximately 13 feet across the 128-foot-long site. te. " [Xue, 2022, p. 1 J (STAFF COMMENTS) b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? The average grade of the site is approximately 10%. Several retaining walls are present on the site, but no steep slopes have been observed. Steep slopes identified by the city's critical areas designation appear to be associated with existing retaining walls. (STAFF COMMENTS) Critical areas determination (CRA2022-0130) C. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, and muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any agricultural land of long term commercial significance and whether the proposal results in removing any of these soils. The site is underlain by approximately 2-3 .feet of fill underlain by medium dense to very dense, silty sand. This has been interpreted as Pre -Fraser glacial till deposits by the project geotechnical engineer. %Xue, 2022, p. 51 (STAFF COMMENTS) d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No. Revised on 9119116 Edmonds 222 SEPA Checklist Page 4 of 25 Packet Pg. 81 e. f. 9. h. 2. AIR (STAFF COMMENTS) Describe the purpose, type, total area and approximate quantities and total affected area of any filling, excavation, and grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Approximately 100 yards of temporary excavation are anticipated to reach proposed foundations. ApproximatelX .. 300 yards of fill are expected to be needed, and the 100 vards of excavation may be reused for this purpose. If not y reused onsite, soils exported from the subject will be dQi isposed of outside city limits. > Q L M N N (STAFF COMMENTS) N T 0 0 M Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. N While erosion is always a possibility during construction, no atypical erosion is expected as part of this small- � scale project on gentle slopes. a 3 a� a� (STAFF COMMENTS) Erosion control measures compliant with Title 18 ECDC required. To be reviewed with ai the Building permits by the Engineering division. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? E Approximately 76% [8295 sa. s c� w r c� 3 (STAFF COMMENTS) a d r Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: c 0 Best management practices BMPs7 will be employed both duringand after construction. Reference civil sheets N C2.0-C4.1 for details. N z J a. w (STAFF COMMENTS) Erosion control measures compliant with Title 18 ECDC required. To be reviewed with c the Building permits by the Engineering division. s a a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, and industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Revised on 9119116 Edmonds 222 SEPA Checklist Page 5 of 25 Packet Pg. 82 Typical construction emissions, such as dust and engine exhaust, are anticipated during the build phase. No significant emissions are anticipated after completion of the project. (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may effect your proposal? If so, generally describe. None known at present. City officials have indicated that the equipment yard to the west of the subiect may be redeveloped as a treatment plant in the future. This future expansion is not included in the city's 2022-2027 or 2023-2028 capital improvements plans, suggesting that it is to be considered a potential long-term impact rather than to be anticipated in the short term. (STAFF COMMENTS) C. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to the air, if any: Typical construction practices, such as watering exposed earth to reduce dust, will be employed at the discretion Of the ,general contractor. No measures are proposed after the completion of construction. (STAFF COMMENTS) 3. WATER a. Surface: (1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, and wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. No. (STAFF COMMENTS) (2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. (STAFF COMMENTS) m Q L Cl) N N N T 0 0 c� N O N Z J a 2D m c a� d G w r a� E s 0 c� w 3 0 a d W ti 0 0 M N O N Z J a w _ m E s 0 a Revised on 9119116 Edmonds 222 SEPA Checklist Page 6 of 25 Packet Pg. 83 b (3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None. (STAFF COMMENTS) L M (4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, N purpose, and approximate quantities if known. 04 T No. c 0 M N O N Z J a (STAFF COMMENTS) 3 2 a� c P 0 Q (5) Does the proposal He within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. o No. r c a� E s c� w r c� 3 (STAFF COMMENTS) 0 0_ d (6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the r N type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. c 0 No. M 0 N Z J a. w c (STAFF COMMENTS) m s 0 a Ground: (1) Will ground water be withdrawn from a well for drinking water or other purposes? If so, give a general description of the well, proposed uses and approximate quantities withdrawn from the well Revised on 9119116 Edmonds 222 SEPA Checklist Page 7 of 25 Packet Pg. 84 C. Will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Lm (STAFF COMMENTS) (2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. (STAFF COMMENTS) Water Runoff (including storm water): (1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Runo will be generated by the proposed structures and pavement. It will be collected by catch basins and drains, and the collected water will be conveyed to the public storm main. See civil sheets C3.0-C4.1.f details. (STAFF COMMENTS) Stormwater management measures compliant with Title 18 ECDC required. To be reviewed further with the Building permits by the Engineering division. (2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. Not anticipated. (STAFF COMMENTS) Stormwater management measures compliant with Title 18 ECDC required. To be reviewed further with the Building permits by the Engineering division. m Q L M N N N ti O O Cl) N O N Z J a a3i a� c P 0 Q N C Q E s 0 c� 3 0 Q. 0 �a co r O O M N O N Z J IL d E t 0 �a r Q Revised on 9119116 Edmonds 222 SEPA Checklist Page 8 of 25 Packet Pg. 85 (3) Does the proposal alter or otherwise affect drainage patterns in the vicinity of the site? If so, describe. The natural grade directs runoff to the west, and the proposed conveyances will route it to the storm drain to the east. This is necessitated by site constraints including topography and the lack of public stormwater infrastructure to the west. Refer to the attached preliminary stormwater engineering Mport for details. (STAFF COMMENTS) Stormwater management measures compliant with Title 18 ECDC required. To be reviewed further with the Building permits by the Engineering division. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, runoff water, and drainage pattern impacts, if any: The proiect will collect runoff and convey it to the public storm main. While extensive subgrade dewaterin is s not anticipated, footing drains will be installed and routed to the public storm main. (STAFF COMMENTS) Stormwater management measures and erosion control compliant with Title 18 ECDC required. To be reviewed further with the Building permits by the Engineering division. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: X deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other: Species unknown evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other: X shrubs Species unknown X grass Lawn pasture crop or grain Orchards, vineyards or other permanent crops wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other: water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other: other types of vegetation: (STAFF COMMENTS) Trees identified as cherries (Prunus sp.) in tree retention and protection plan. U) m Q .a M N N N T 0 0 Cl) N 0 N Z J IL 3 a� a� .y w a� E s U c� w r c� 3 0 0_ d r ti 0 0 M N 0 N Z J a. w _ m E s 0 a Revised on 9119116 Edmonds 222 SEPA Checklist Page 9 of 25 Packet Pg. 86 b. C. rip e. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? The site is to be fully cleared, including both significant trees. (STAFF COMMENTS) List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known. (STAFF COMMENTS) Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other materials to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: The perimeter of the site will be landscaped at the close of construction. This will include several new trees, shrubs and Qroundcover plantings. Specials may include Serbian spruce, maple, lavender, hairy manzanita and vibernum as shown on the preliminaa landscape plan. Final species selections will be made at a later date. (STAFF COMMENTS) Majority of required replacement trees to be native species. Presently proposed to include vine maple and western red cedar. All plantings must be compatible with Edmonds' climate. List all noxious weeds and invasive species known to be on or near the site. None known. (STAFF COMMENTS) U) m Q L M N N N T 0 0 M N 0 N Z J a a3i a� .y Q r Q E s 0 c� 3 0 0_ d r ti 0 0 c� N 0 N Z J a w _ m E s 0 a Revised on 9119116 Edmonds 222 SEPA Checklist Page 10 of 25 Packet Pg. 87 5. Animals a. List any birds and other animals that have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site. Examples include: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: None known. (STAFF COMMENTS) Typical urban fauna anticipated, especially birds and mammals. No fish. b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known. (STAFF COMMENTS) C. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Unknown. (STAFF COMMENTS) d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None proposed. U) m Q L M N N N T 0 0 M N 0 N Z J a a3i a� c P y Q N C t V w rr cC 3 0 0_ d ti 0 0 M N 0 N Z J a. c m E s 0 a Revised on 9119116 Edmonds 222 SEPA Checklist Page 11 of 25 Packet Pg. 88 6. (STAFF COMMENTS) e. List any invasive animal species known to be on or near the site. None known. (STAFF COMMENTS) Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electric enea y will be used for space conditioning, and other domestic uses. Natural gas may be used for cookinz and water heating, and this decision will be finalized durinz review of the project's building permits. (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. This small-scale proiect is not expected to have a sip_nificant impact on the northerly neighbor's solar access. (STAFF COMMENTS) C. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: The project will be designed in accordance with current Washington State Enea y Code, which requires a variety of enea y conservation measures. The final measures used will be selected at a later date. U) m Q L M N N N T 0 0 M N 0 N Z J IL 3 a� a� .y Q a N _ a� E s 0 c� w r c� 3 0 a d W r ti 0 0 M N 0 N Z J a. w _ m E t 0 a Revised on 9119116 Edmonds 222 SEPA Checklist Page 12 of 25 Packet Pg. 89 (STAFF COMMENTS) 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so describe. No environmental health hazards are expected from this residential project. (STAFF COMMENTS) (1) Describe any known or possible contamination at the site from present or past uses. An existing underground oil tank is present on the subject. It [and any contaminated soil) will be removed during excavation for the project. (STAFF COMMENTS) (2) Describe existing hazardous chemicals/conditions that might affect project development and design. This includes underground hazardous liquid and gas transmission pipelines located within the project area and in the vicinity. None known. (STAFF COMMENTS) (3) Describe any toxic or hazardous chemicals that might be stored, used, or produced during the project's development or constructions, or at any time during the operating life of the project. None anticipated, except in household quantities. U) m Q L M N N N T O Cl) N O N Z J a a3i m c d G r a� E s c� w r c� 3 0 0_ d CU w ti 0 0 M N O N Z J a. w c m E s 0 a Revised on 9119116 Edmonds 222 SEPA Checklist Page 13 of 25 Packet Pg. 90 b. (STAFF COMMENTS) (4) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None anticipated. (STAFF COMMENTS) (5) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: None proposed. (STAFF COMMENTS) Noise (1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? The westerly abutting parcel is developed with what appears to be a heavy equipment garage. Some traffic noise is anticipated from 3' Avenue S and Dayton Street. (STAFF COMMENTS) (2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hour's noise would come from the site. Typical construction noise is anticipated during the construction phase. No sipniflcant noise generation is expected from this residential project post -occupancy. U) m Q L M N N N T O 0 Cl) N 0 N Z J a a3i a� o_ P 0 Q N _ s c� 3 0 0_ d r ti 0 0 M N 0 N Z J a. _ m E t 0 a Revised on 9119116 Edmonds 222 SEPA Checklist Page 14 of 25 Packet Pg. 91 (STAFF COMMENTS) (3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Construction activities will be limited to city -standard working hours and days. No noise controls are proposed after the completion of construction. (STAFF COMMENTS) 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Will the proposal affect current land uses on nearby or adjacent properties? If so, describe. The subiect abuts residential condomiums to the north and south. The westerly abutting parcel is developed with an office building (currently occupied by ArtWorks Edmonds) and what appears to be a heavy equipment garage. Parcels on the opposite side of 3'd Avenue S are developed with multifamily residential structures. The proposal is not expected to affect these adjacent uses. (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Has the project site been used as working farmlands or working forest lands? If so, describe. How much agricultural or forest land of long-term commercial significance will be converted to other uses as a result of the proposal, if any? If resource lands have not been designated, how many acres in farmland or forest land tax status will be converted to nonfarm or nonforest use? No. (STAFF COMMENTS) (1) Will the proposal affect or be affected by surrounding working farm or forest land normal business operations, such as oversize equipment access, the application of pesticides, tilling, and harvesting? If so, how: U) m Q L M N N N CD 0 Cl) N 0 N Z J a m m c a� d G r a� E s c� w 3 0 0_ d �a Cn r 0 0 N 0 N Z J IL r _ a> E t �a r a Revised on 9119116 Edmonds 222 SEPA Checklist Page 15 of 25 Packet Pg. 92 C. d. e. f. No. (STAFF COMMENTS) Describe any structures on the site. The subject is currently developed with a sin lie -family residence on i Wally built in 1906 A storage shed is located in the subiect's southwest corner. (STAFF COMMENTS) Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? All existing structures on the site are to be demolished. (STAFF COMMENTS) What is the current zoning classification of the site? RM-1.5 (STAFF COMMENTS) What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Multifamily — High Density (STAFF COMMENTS) U) a Revised on 9119116 Edmonds 222 SEPA Checklist Page 16 of 25 Packet Pg. 93 9. h. j• k. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master plan designation of the site? (STAFF COMMENTS) Has any part of the site been classified critical area by the city? If so, specify. Portions of the site were designated as erosion hazard areas under CRA2022-0130, specifically those exceeding 15% grade. However, the project geotechnical engineer anticipates that slopes as steep as 2H:1 V will be stable. [Xue. 2022, p. 127 No slope stability issues are anticipated. (STAFF COMMENTS) Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Approximately I5 persons. (STAFF COMMENTS) Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None, the subiect parcel is presently vacant. (STAFF COMMENTS) Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None proposed. The subject parcel is presently vacant. (STAFF COMMENTS) U) a Revised on 9119116 Edmonds 222 SEPA Checklist Page 17 of 25 Packet Pg. 94 J Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The proposed development is permitted outright by current zoning and conforms to the ope of development anticipated by the comprehesive plan designation. Most nearby parcels are developed with various forms of multifamily housing, and the proposal fits well within the existing land use context. (STAFF COMMENTS) In. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts to agricultural and forest lands of long-term commercial significance, if any: None proposed. (STAFF COMMENTS) Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Five units of middle -income housing are (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Approximately how many units, if any would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. One unit ofhizh-income housing will be eliminated. (STAFF COMMENTS) C. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None proposed. U) m Q L M N N N T 0 0 Cl) N 0 N Z J a a3i a� c .y Q a w a� E s c� w r c� 3 0 0- d W r ti 0 0 M N 0 N Z J a. w c m E s 0 a Revised on 9119116 Edmonds 222 SEPA Checklist Page 18 of 25 Packet Pg. 95 (STAFF COMMENTS) 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principle exterior building material(s) proposed? The tallest structures are to be 30,ft tall. Primary exterior materials include brick veneer, vertical lap siding and metal panel roofing. (STAFF COMMENTS) b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Due to the sloping site and relatively low structures, the effect of the project on local views is expected to be minimal. (STAFF COMMENTS) Complies with RM zone height limit. No unanticipated or impermissible obstruction. C. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: The project will undergo design review. (STAFF COMMENTS) 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? This residential project is not expected to produce substantial glare. Interior lights will be visible through windows, particularly in the evening hours. U) m Q M N N N ti 0 0 M N 0 N Z J a a3i a� c .y Q c Q E s 0 c� w r c� 3 0 0_ d ti 0 0 M N 0 N Z J a. w c m E s 0 a Revised on 9119116 Edmonds 222 SEPA Checklist Page 19 of 25 Packet Pg. 96 (STAFF COMMENTS) Subject to design review by Architectural Design Board. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? Not anticipated. (STAFF COMMENTS) C. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None anticipated. (STAFF COMMENTS) d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Exterior lighting will be kept to the minimum necessary to create a safe and welcoming environment, and light from vehicle headlights will be mitigated by placing the motor court between the two blocks of townhouses. Landscaping will also be used along the southerly property line to mitigate headlight spillover to the nei hag site. (STAFF COMMENTS) 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? The Edmonds Marsh natural area is located approximately % mile to the southwest, and the downtown retail area is located approximately one block to the east. (STAFF COMMENTS) U) m Q L M N N N T O 0 M N 0 N Z J a a3i a� c a� .y G c a� E s c� w 3 0 0_ d r co ti 0 0 M N 0 N Z J a. c m E t 0 0 a Revised on 9119116 Edmonds 222 SEPA Checklist Page 20 of 25 Packet Pg. 97 b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreation uses? If so, describe. No. (STAFF COMMENTS) C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: The project will pay nark impact fees. Passive recreation will be provided onsite via patios, porches and planted areas. (STAFF COMMENTS) 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any buildings, structures, or sites located on or near the site that are over 45 years old listed in, or eligible for listing in national, state, or local preservation registers? If so, specifically describe. The existin;family residence on the site is more than 45 years old. It does not appear to be on any preservation registers. (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Are there any landmarks, features, or other evidence of Indian or historic use or occupation? This may include human burials or old cemeteries. Are there any material evidence, artifacts, or areas of cultural importance on or near the site? Please list any professional studies conducted at the site to identify such resources. No such resources have been found. No professional studies have been conducted. U) a Revised on 9119116 Edmonds 222 SEPA Checklist Page 21 of 25 Packet Pg. 98 14. (STAFF COMMENTS) C. Describe the methods used to assess the potential impacts to cultural and historic resources on or near the project site. Examples include consultation with tribes and the Department of Archeology and Historic .-. Preservation, archaeological surveys, historic maps, GIS date, etc. U) The WISAARD database has been consulted, as have local, state and federal preservation registers. ai Q L M N N N CD (STAFF COMMENTS) c 0 N O N Z J a d. Proposed measures to avoid, minimize, or compensate for loss, changes to, and disturbance to resources. Please include plans for the above and any permits that may be required. None proposed as no resources are known to exist. a� _ P y 4) a N (STAFF COMMENTS) _ E s c� w r c� 3 0 0_ Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site or affected geographic area, and describe proposed in access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. T" The subiect is served by 3rd Avenue S to its east. Access to this right-of-wav is proposed to be a shared driveway ti c along the north side of the subiect. M 04 N Z J a r (STAFF COMMENTS) d t 0 r r Q b. Is the site or affected geographic area currently served by public transit? If so, generally describe. If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Yes, the area is served by Community Transit's 116, 130, 196 and 416 bus lines. These lines run along Davton Street to the north of the subiect. The nearest stop is approximately 500 feet from the subiect. Revised on 9119116 Edmonds 222 SEPA Checklist Page 22 of 25 Packet Pg. 99 C. II e. (STAFF COMMENTS) How many additional parking spaces would the completed project or nonproject proposal have? How many would the project or proposal eliminate? The proposal includes ten garage parking spaces. It would eliminate one surface parking space to the south of the existing residence. (STAFF COMMENTS) At least nine off-street parking spaces required. Will the proposal require any new or improvements to existing roads, streets, pedestrian, bicycle or state transportation facilities not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). It is expected that the project will replace the public sidewalk and curb along its frontage. Asphalt overlay may be required in the existing roadway as a consequence of utility service installation. No other ri h�t-of waX improvements are proposed. See civil sheeat C4.0-C4.1 for details. (STAFF COMMENTS) Will the project or proposal use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. (STAFF COMMENTS) U) m Q .a M N N N 0 0 c� N 0 N Z J a A) m c a) N a) G d E s ca w as 0 0_ d r co ti 0 0 M N 0 N Z J a w c m E s 0 a Revised on 9119116 Edmonds 222 SEPA Checklist Page 23 of 25 Packet Pg. 100 f. 9. h. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur and what percentage of the volume would be trucks (such as commercial and passenger vehicles). What data or transportation models were used to make these estimates? Per the ITE Manual, midrise multifamily development in a general urban or suburban context ,generates approximately 0.44 trips per unit. The Manual also indicates that since -family detached development in this context ,generates approximately 0.99 trips per day. Townhouses are likely more akin to detached since family resulting in an estimate of 4.95 trips per day. No truck traffic is expected for this residential development. (STAFF COMMENTS) Will the proposal interfere with, affect or be affected by the movement of agricultural and forest products on roads or streets in the area? If so, generally describe. No. (STAFF COMMENTS) Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: Transportation impact fees will be paid. (STAFF COMMENTS) 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, public transit, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. The project increases the number of dwelling units on the subject, resulting in a corresponding increase in the need for public services. As the project is relatively small, the impact is also expected to be small. (STAFF COMMENTS) w r Q E s c� w r c� 3 0 0_ d r ti 0 0 M N 0 N Z J a w c m E s 0 a Revised on 9119116 Edmonds 222 SEPA Checklist Page 24 of 25 Packet Pg. 101 b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any: Fire impact fees will be paid. (STAFF COMMENTS) U) ai Q L M 16. Utilities C*4 N a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, c sanitary sewer, septic system, other: M N Public sanitary sewer, storm sewer, water, refuse service, electricity, communications and natural gas services o N are currently available to the subiect. J a (STAFF COMMENTS) W c a� d G b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general c construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. E Water, sewer, storm: City ofEdmonds s c� Electricity: Snohomish County PUD Natural Gas: Puget Sound Energy Refuse: Sound Disposal Utility service lines will eg nerally be required between the utility mains and townhouses. Most mains are located in the 31 Avenue S rikht-of-way, and the sanitary sewer main is located near the westerly property line of the subiect. (STAFF COMMENTS) C. SIGNATURE I declare under penalty of rjury law that the above answers are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is re ing on the to make its decision. 10.08.2022 Date Submitted Revised on 9119116 Edmonds 222 SEPA Checklist Page 25 of 25 Packet Pg. 102 Architectural Design Board Agenda Item Meeting Date: 12/9/2024 Cascara Townhouses Staff Lead: Mike Clugston Department: Planning Division Prepared By: Michael Clugston Background/History This is a new project for Board review. Staff Recommendation Approve with conditions as noted in the attached staff report. Narrative The proposal is for two three -unit townhouse buildings and site improvements at the vacant 9516 Edmonds Way. The north building would front Edmonds Way, and the south building would be behind separated by a drive aisle to access parking within the buildings. An existing curb cut at the west edge of the site at Edmonds Way that currently serves the subject site and the two parcels to the south will be retained and upgraded together with the rest of the project's frontage. The upgraded access drive will continue to serve the subject site and the two lots to the south, and it will also provide access for the lot to the west. Together with the staff report are 13 attachments including the project plans and related documents. Attachments: PLN2023-0029 Staff report and attachments Packet Pg. 103 '12C. 189\3 A IM912 a 11T1lei �i 121 51h Avenue North, Edmonds WA 98020 Phone: 425.771.0220 • Fax: 425.771.0221 • Web: www.edmondswa.gov PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • PLANNING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION REPORT TO THE ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN BOARD Project: Cascara Townhouses File Number: PLN2023-0029 Date of Report: December 4, 2024 Staff Contact: _111641 _ Mike Clugston, AICP, Planning Manager Meeting: Monday — December 9, 2024 at 6:00 P.M. Brackett Room, 3r6 Floor City Hall 121 5th Avenue North, Edmonds WA 98020 Or on Zoom at: https://edmondswa-gov.zoom.us/4/88959586932 Passcode: 591531 Join by phone at: 253 205 0468 I. PROJECT PROPOSAL The proposal is for two three -unit townhouse buildings and site improvements at the vacant 9516 Edmonds Way. The north building would front Edmonds Way, and the south building would be behind separated by a drive aisle to access parking within the buildings. An existing curb cut at the west edge of the site at Edmonds Way that currently serves the subject site and the two parcels to the south will be retained and upgraded together with the rest of the project's frontage. The upgraded access drive will continue to serve the subject site and the two lots to the south, and it will also provide access for the lot to the west. II. FINDINGS, ANALYSIS & CONCLUSIONS A. PROCESS Design review is required for this project as indicated in Section 20.10.020.A of the Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC). Due to its location and because it required a SEPA threshold determination, per ECDC 20.10.010.C, general design review is required by the Architectural Design Board (ADB) using the requirements in ECDC 20.11. Findings must be Packet Pg. 104 Cascara Townhouses PLN2023-0029 made relative to the design criteria in ECDC 20.11.030, the urban design chapter of the Community Culture and Urban Design Element of the Comprehensive Plan, and the zoning ordinance. A Type III -A permit, the Design Board conducts a public hearing to take testimony and establish the record and then issues the final decision on the design of the project. The following Attachments are included with this report: 1. Land use application 2. Project narrative 3. Aerial photo 4. Architectural plans • Location and site plans • Floor plans • Elevations • Building renderings • Light schedule and rendering 5. Preliminary civil plans 6. Arborist report 7. Landscape plans 8. Letter from trash hauler 9. Notice of complete application and notice of application documentation 10. Solomon/Getachew comment 11. SEPA DNS and checklist 12. Notice of public hearing and SEPA determination 13. Technical comments B. SETTING 1. Address: 9516 Edmonds Way (Tax ID: 27033600100900) 2. Zoning: Multiple Residential - Edmonds Way (RM-EW) 3. Comprehensive Plan designation: Edmonds Way Corridor 4. Neighborhood: The project site is located at the eastern end of the Westgate commercial area along Edmonds Way. The subject parcel is surrounded by underdeveloped parcels that are zoned Multiple Residential and Community Business — Edmonds Way. The parcels are either vacant (to the west) or developed with older single-family residences (south and east). Further west is a PUD substation and further east are several multifamily developments. North of Edmonds Way is an area of underdeveloped parcels zoned Multiple Residential and Community Business — Edmonds Way. 5. Environment: The site is fairly level, with approximately 6% slope. A critical area determination was completed for the site in 2007 which identified no critical areas on the site. The site was originally developed with a single-family residence but that was Page 2 of 16 Packet Pg. 105 Cascara Townhouses PLN2023-0029 demolished in 2007, and the site is now vacant with some existing trees and vegetation along the west and south property lines. C. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The proposal is subject to the design guidance found in the 2020 Comprehensive Plan's Urban Design Element (pages 123 - 125). There is also guidance for commercial and multifamily development along the Edmonds Way Corridor (page 73). Refer to Attachment 4 for project plans and color renderings and Attachment 2 for the applicant's analysis of the project relative to the design guidance. Design Objectives for Site Design. The development of parking lots, pedestrian N walkways and landscaping features is an integral part of how a building interacts with s its site and its surrounding environment. Good design and site planning improves access 3 by pedestrians, bicycles and automobiles, minimizes potential negative impacts to 0 adjacent development, reinforces the character and activities within a district and builds a more cohesive and coherent physical environment. y A.1 Vehicular Access. Reduce the numbers and width of driveways (curb cuts) in order M v to improve pedestrian, bicycle and auto safety. A.2 Layout of Parking. Locating buildings in proximity to the street to facilitate direct pedestrian access and help define the street edge. Parking should be placed to the side and rear. A.3 Connections On- and Offsite. Design site access and circulation within and between sites to encourage linkages for pedestrians, vehicles, and bicycles. Special attention should be paid to providing and improving connections to transit. A.4 Building Entry Location. Building entries should be configured to provide clear entry points to buildings, be oriented to pedestrian walkways/pathways, and support the overall intent of the streetscape environment. Space at the entry for gathering or seating is desirable for residential or mixed use buildings. A.5 Setbacks. Create and maintain the landscape and site characteristics of each neighborhood area and provide a common street frontage tying each site to its neighbor. Setbacks should be appropriate to the desired streetscape, providing for transition areas between public streets and private building entries where a variety of activities and amenities can occur. A.6 Open Space. For residential settings, create green spaces to enhance the visual attributes of the development and provide places for interaction, play, seating, and other activities. A.7 Building/Site Identity. Improve pedestrian access and way finding by providing variety in building forms, colors, materials and individuality of buildings. A.8 Weather Protection. Provide covered walkways and entries for pedestrian weather protection. Page 3 of 16 Packet Pg. 106 Cascara Townhouses PLN2023-0029 A.9 Lighting. Provide adequate and appropriate illumination in all areas used by automobiles, bicycles and pedestrians — including building entries, walkways, parking areas, circulation areas and other open spaces — to support activity and security. A.10 Signage. Encourage signage that provides clear information and direction for properties and businesses while preventing the streetscape from becoming cluttered. Encourage the use of graphics and symbols in signage to support the city's emphasis on uniqueness and the arts. A.11 Site Utilities, Storage, Trash and Mechanical Systems. Minimize the noise, odor and visual impacts of utility systems using such features as landscaping, building forms, or integrated design. A.12 Integrating Site Features. Integrate natural landscape features and unique landforms — such as rocky outcroppings or significant trees — into site design whenever possible. A.13 Landscape Buffers. Use landscaping and/or other features such as fences to maintain privacy and create a visual barrier between incompatible uses. These buffering techniques should also be used to soften hard edges (such as the perimeters of parking lots) and reinforce pedestrian ways and circulation routes. Native plants and rain gardens should be promoted as alternatives to lawns and runoff retention areas. Analysis of Site Design: The project site is generally level with Edmonds Way and presents few challenges to redevelopment. An existing curb cut at the west edge of the site to Edmonds Way that serves the subject site and the two parcels to the south will be retained and upgraded together with the rest of the project's frontage. The upgraded access drive will continue to serve the subject site and the two lots to the south and it will also provide access for the lot to the west. Trash and recycling will be located in a screened area at the east end of the internal drive between the buildings. The north building fronts Edmonds Way with pedestrian entrances and porches and the third floor is recessed from a PUD power line and easement along Edmonds Way, creating a small deck area. Parking will be incorporated in individual units and buffer landscaping would be provided around the site. Design Objectives for Building Form. Building height and modulation guidelines are essential to create diversity in building forms, minimize shadows cast by taller buildings upon the pedestrian areas and to ensure compliance with policies in the city's Comprehensive Plan. Protecting views from public parks and building entries as well as street views to the mountains and Puget Sound are an important part of Edmonds character and urban form. A.14 Building Form. Encourage new construction to avoid repetitive, monotonous building forms. Page 4 of 16 Packet Pg. 107 Cascara Townhouses PLN2023-0029 A.15 Massing. Reduce the apparent bulk and mass of buildings by encouraging human scale elements in building design and/or by subdividing building masses vertically or horizontally. A.16 Roof Modulation. Use roof forms to help identify different programs or functional areas within the building and support differentiation of building form and massing. Roof design, in combination with wall modulation, can allow for additional light to enter buildings or pedestrian spaces. A.17 Wall Modulation. Variation in materials, decorative elements, or other features should be employed to support pedestrian scale environments and streetscapes, or to help break up large building masses to keep in scale with the surrounding N environment. o s Analysis of Building Form: The proposed buildings use a mix of materials along with wall c and roof modulation to reduce apparent mass and create pedestrian scale. M L Design Objectives for Building Facade. Building facade objectives ensure that the y exterior of a building — the portion of a building that defines the character and visual v appearance of a place — is of high quality and demonstrates the strong sense of place and integrity valued by the residents of the City of Edmonds. r E A.18 Building Facade Design. Encourage building fagades that reinforce the appearance and consistency of streetscape patterns while supporting diversity and identity in building design. _ A.19 Window Variety and Articulation. Use window size and placement to help define CU the scale and character of the building. Use the organization and combinations of window types to reinforce the streetscape character or to provide variation in a facade, as well as provide light and air to the building interior. A.20 Variation in Facade Materials. Employ variation in materials, colors or design c elements on building fagades to help define the scale and style of the structure. M Variation in facade materials can help reduce the apparent bulk of larger buildings N while allowing variety and individuality of building design. ? Analysis of Building Facade: The proposed facades use shapes and materials found throughout contemporary residential developments in Edmonds. Each facade includes a variety of materials, window sizes, and articulation with roof overhangs. The north building relates well to Edmonds Way using small canopies over pedestrian entrances within fenced patio areas together with large windows and recessed third -floor decks. Commercial Development Goal E. The Edmonds Way Corridor consists of portions of Edmonds Way between the 100th Avenue West intersection and Highway 99. This corridor serves as a key transportation corridor, and also provides a key link between Edmonds and Interstate 5. Established residential areas lie on both sides of the corridor. An established pattern of multiple family residential development lies along much of the corridor, while small-scale businesses can be found primarily near intersections. A major concern is that the more intensive development that occurs along the corridor should not Page 5 of 16 Packet Pg. 108 Cascara Townhouses PLN2023-0029 interfere with the flow of through traffic or intrude into adjoining established communities. E.1 Permit uses in planned multiple family or small-scale business developments that are designed to minimize contributing significantly to traffic congestion. E.2 Provide for transit and pedestrian access to development. E.3 Use design review to encourage the shared or joint use of driveways and access points by development onto SR-104 in order to support the movement of traffic in a safe and efficient manner. Site access should not be provided from residential streets unless there is no feasible alternative. E.4 Use design review to ensure that development provides a transition to adjacent w o residential neighborhoods. For uses in transitional areas adjacent to single family 3 neighborhoods, use design techniques such as the modulation of facades, pitched 0 roofs, stepped -down building heights, multiple buildings, and landscaping to provide designs compatible with single family development. Make use of natural y topography to buffer incompatible development whenever possible. v Analysis of Commercial Development: Commercial uses are not proposed with this multifamily project. The existing access to the site at Edmonds Way will be upgraded to create an improved shared access point for the subject site as well as two parcels to the south and one to the west. Staff Conclusion Staff finds that the proposal is consistent with the design guidance in the Comprehensive Plan for Site Design, Building Form, and Building Fagade as well as Commercial Development along the Edmonds Way Corridor. D. APPLICABLE ZONING CODES Compliance with all codes will be verified through the review and approval of subsequent building, engineering, and fire permits. 1. ECDC 16.50 Multiple Residential — Edmonds Wav (RM-E a. Use. Multiple dwelling units are primary permitted uses in the RW-EM zone (ECDC 16.30.010.A). b. Site development standards (per ECDC 16.30.030.A): Minimum Minimum Minimum Maximum Maximum Zone Street Side Rear Height Coverage Setback Setback Setback RM-EW 15' 10' 15' 2514 45% Page 6 of 16 Packet Pg. 109 Cascara Townhouses PLN2023-0029 The maximum base height of any building fronting on Edmonds Way may be increased to 35 feet if the following apply to the site and proposed development: (a) At least two of the following techniques shall be incorporated into the building and/or site's design: (1) Achievement of at least LEED gold certification or comparable green building certification; (2) Inclusion of housing units affordable to persons at low/moderate income as determined by Snohomish County Tomorrow. The number of affordable units must be at least 15 percent of the gross number of units proposed; (3) Low impact development (LID) techniques are employed. LID best management practices include, but are not limited to: bioretention/rain gardens, permeable pavements, roof downspout controls, dispersion, soil quality and depth, minimal excavation foundations, vegetated roofs, and water re -use. Height: As noted above, the north building fronting Edmonds Way may be up to 35 feet in height, if the requirements listed above in Sub 4(a) are met. As shown on Sheets A100, A300 and A301 of Attachment 4, the north building would meet the 35-foot standard. However, the applicant has not indicated which two of the three criteria for extra height would be achieved by the development — a condition to that effect is proposed. The maximum height allowed for the south building is 25 feet, but a 30-foot-tall building is shown on Sheets A100, A300 and A301 of Attachment 4. The 4:12 roof pitch exception available in other RM subdistricts was used for the south building but unfortunately that is not an available exception in the RM-EW zone per ECDC 16.30.030(A). The south building must be redesigned to comply with the height criteria or the project revised to only have one building that would meet the 35' height required described above; a condition to that effect is proposed. According to ECDC 21.40.030(B), average level is calculated by averaging elevations of the downward projections of the four corners of the smallest rectangle which will enclose all of the building, excluding a maximum of 30 inches of eaves. If a corner falls off the site, its elevation shall be the average elevation of the two points projected downward where the two sides of the rectangle cross the property line. Setbacks: The proposed north building is set back 15 feet from the street property line along Edmonds Way, which meets the minimum zoning requirement and accommodates an existing utility easement along the frontage (Sheet 100 of Attachment 4). Both buildings would meet the 10-foot side setback from the east property line as well as that from the shared easement on the west side of the project. The south building is set back more than 15 feet from the south property line. In the RM — EW zone, uncovered and unenclosed porches, steps, patios, and decks may occupy up to one-half of the required street setback area along Edmonds Way; provided, that these structures or uses are located no more than 20 feet above the ground level at any point. Small fenced patio areas would be located within the street setback for each of the three units in the north building, which would meet the exception. d N 3 0 s 3 0 M N M U Page 7 of 16 Packet Pg. 110 Cascara Townhouses PLN2023-0029 Eaves may project up to 30 inches into required setbacks in accordance with ECDC 21.90.020. The east eaves both buildings encroach approximately 12 inches into the east side setback. Entry canopies on the north building would encroach approximately 18 inches into the north street setback. Maximum Lot Coverage: The two buildings, including the 2n' and 3rd floor overhangs as shown on Sheet A200 of Attachment 4, are proposed to cover approximately 44% of the net lot area (11,571 sq. ft. gross lot area minus the 2,483 sq. ft. access easement equals 9,268 sq. ft. of net lot area; the two buildings will cover approximately 4,077 sq. ft. of the 9,268 sq. ft. or 44%). N a� w RM-EW Design Criteria: ECDC 16.30.030.13.1 contains one zone -specific design criterion for o facade materials: 3 Seventy-five percent of a building facade facing a public right-of-way shall be clad 0 with preferred building materials which include natural stone, wood, architectural metal, brick and glass. Concrete, laminates, veneers, fiber cement products and the like may be permitted if they replicate the appearance of the listed preferred 0 materials. At least 55 percent of building facade materials must be salvaged, c recycled content, bio-based or indigenous. The north facade of the building fronting Edmonds Way exceeds the 75% criterion since it would clad with batten and board on levels 1 and 2 with large glass windows on each. Small wood and metal fences define the pedestrian entries, each of which is covered with a small canopy. The recessed third level has large glass windows and is clad with fiber cement panels. A similar theme is used on both buildings. The 55% criterion is also met through the use of fiber cement, wood, and glass on all sides of the buildings. 2. ECDC 17.50 Off Street Parking Regulations According to ECDC 17.50.020(A)(1)(b), the number of parking spaces required per dwelling unit for multifamily units is based upon the number of bedrooms per unit. Each of the six two -bedroom units will provide two enclosed parking stalls, meeting the standard. Five surface stalls are shown on the adjacent property that have access from the shared driveway on the west side of the project site. It appears that the spaces would be used as additional or guest parking for the Cascara project; a shared parking agreement is required to describe the operation and maintenance of those stalls and a condition to that effect is proposed. 3. ECDC 17.115 Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure The project must meet the minimum requirements electric vehicle charging for multiple dwelling units in ECDC 17.115; a condition to that effect is proposed. 4. ECDC 17.120 Bicycle Parking Facilities Bikes racks are shown by the pedestrian entrances to the three north units (Sheet A100 of Attachment 4), but no others are indicated. The project must meet the minimum Page 8 of 16 Packet Pg. 111 Cascara Townhouses PLN2023-0029 requirements for short- and long-term bike parking for multiple dwelling units in ECDC 17.120; a condition to that effect is proposed. 5. ECDC 20.02 Development Proiect Permit Applications This project was submitted on May 10, 2023, the application fees paid for on May 15, 2023, and the application was determined to be technically complete on June 13, 2023. Requests for supplemental information and clarifications were made afterwards but public notice of the project could be issued. 6. ECDC 20.03 Public Notice Requirements A Notice of Application and Request for Comment was published in the Herald Newspaper and posted at the subject site, Public Safety Complex, and City Hall on June 23, 2023 (Attachment 9). Notices were also mailed to property owners within 300 feet of the site. Il�ll�[�iIilt•lt•1�� One public comment was received after the notice of application was distributed (Attachment 10). Genet Solomon and Desta Getachew own an adjacent property to the east at 9510 Edmonds Way and were interested in how access to the new project would affect their site. Because the new project will use the existing curb cut on the west side of the project site, no impact to access for the parcel to the east would occur. A Notice of Public Hearing and SEPA Determination was advertised in the same manner as the notice of application on November 25, 2024 (Attachment 12). No new public comments have been received as of the date of this report. 7. ECDC 20.11 General Design Review Criteria Per ECDC 20.10 (Design Review), General Design Review is required for this project since it is not located within an area that has district -based design standards. ECDC 20.11.030 lists the general criteria for Building Design, Site Treatment, and Other Criteria that the proposal must satisfy. Refer to Attachment 3 for project plans and color renderings and Attachment 2 for the applicant's analysis of the project relative to the design criteria. A. ECDC 20.11.030.A. Building Design. No one architectural style is required. The building shall be designed to comply with the purposes of this chapter and to avoid conflict with the existing and planned character of the nearby area. All elements of building design shall form an integrated development, harmonious in scale, line and mass. The following are included as elements of building design: 1. All exterior building components, including windows, doors, eaves, and parapets. 2. Colors, which should avoid excessive brilliance or brightness except where that would enhance the character of the area. 3. Mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on the roof, grounds or buildings should be screened from view from the street level. Page 9 of 16 Packet Pg. 112 Cascara Townhouses PLN2023-0029 4. Long, massive, unbroken or monotonous buildings shall be avoided in order to comply with the purposes of this chapter and the design objectives of the comprehensive plan. This criterion is meant to describe the entire building. All elements of the design of a building including the massing, building forms, architectural details and finish materials contribute to whether or not a building is found to be long, massive, unbroken or monotonous. 5. All signs should conform to the general design theme of the development. The proposed buildings are not long, massive or monotonous. They are pedestrian scaled, and a variety of materials are used throughout. No signage is proposed and any mechanical equipment near the street front would be screened by proposed landscaping and fencing. N B. ECDC 20.11.030.8. Site Treatment. 3 s The existing character of the site and the nearby area should be the starting point for the 0 design of the building and all site treatment. The following are elements of site treatment: N 1. Grading, vegetation removal and other changes to the site shall be minimized M 0 where natural beauty exists. Large cut and fill and impervious surfaces should be c avoided. E 2. Landscape treatment shall be provided to enhance the building design and other s site improvements. a 3. Landscape treatment shall be provided to buffer the development from a surrounding property where conflict may result, such as parking facilities near c yard spaces, streets or residential units, and different building heights, design or color. �a 4. Landscaping that could be damaged by pedestrians or vehicles should be N protected by curbing or similar devices. c M 5. Service yards, and other areas where trash or litter may accumulate, shall be c screened with planting or fences or walls which are compatible with natural J materials. a 6. All screening should be effective in the winter as well as the summer. 7. Materials such as wood, brick, stone and gravel (as opposed to asphalt or concrete) may be substituted for planting in areas unsuitable for plant growth. a 8. Exterior lighting shall be the minimum necessary for safety and security. Excessive brightness shall be avoided. All lighting shall be low-rise and directed downward onto the site. Lighting standards and patterns shall be compatible with the overall design theme. The site is fairly level and currently overgrown. New landscaping is proposed across the site (Attachment 7) to buffer the buildings and to screen the trash enclosure. Exterior lighting would be minimal, typical of a residential project (Sheet DR07 of Attachment 4). Page 10 of 16 Packet Pg. 113 Cascara Townhouses PLN2023-0029 C. ECDC 20.11.030.C. Other Criteria. 1. Community facilities and public or quasi -public improvements should not conflict with the existing and planned character of the nearby area. 2. Street furniture (including but not limited to benches, light standards, utility poles, newspaper stands, bus shelters, planters, traffic signs and signals, guardrails, rockeries, walls, mail boxes, fire hydrants and garbage cans) should be compatible with the existing and planned character of the nearby area. The project is not a community facility. No street furniture is proposed at the sidewalk; the mailbox is proposed to be interior to the site next to the north building (Sheet C1.0 of Attachment 4). 8. ECDC 20.13 Landscaping Requirements There are five types of landscaping that can be used throughout a site depending on the setting. A Type II mixed buffer would be appropriate along the east and south edges of the project where it is adjacent to less dense residential development. A Type III mixed buffer would be appropriate along the north side of the project site by Edmonds Way. Surface parking areas like that to the west of the access drive require Type V landscaping. While there are specific requirements for each of these landscaping types, the ADB may interpret and modify the requirements as long as the proposal is consistent with the purposes of the design review chapter in ECDC 20.10.000. These purposes include: A. To encourage the realization and conservation of a desirable and aesthetic environment in the city of Edmonds, B. To encourage and promote development which features amenities and excellence in the form of variations of siting, types of structures and adaptation to and conservation of topography and other natural features; C. To encourage creative approaches to the use of land and related physical developments; D. To encourage the enhancement and preservation of land or building of unique or outstanding scenic or historical significance; E. To minimize incompatible and unsightly surroundings and visual blight which prevent orderly community development and reduce community property values. As shown on Attachment 7, the proposal includes a mostly new landscaping around the site and two retained trees. TYPE II Type 11 Landscaping. Type 11 landscaping is intended to create a visual separation between similar uses. 1. Evergreen and deciduous trees, with no more than 30 percent being deciduous, a minimum of six feet in height, and planted at intervals no greater than 20 feet on center, and Page 11 of 16 Packet Pg. 114 Cascara Townhouses PLN2023-0029 2. Shrubs, a minimum of three and one-half feet in height and other plant materials, planted so that the ground will be covered within three years. The landscaping proposed along the south and east edges of the project site is consistent with the Type II criteria. The two trees that are to be retained as part of the redevelopment are located along the south edge as well. TYPE III Type Ill landscaping is intended to provide visual separation of uses from streets, and visual separation of compatible uses so as to soften the appearance of streets, parking areas and building elevations. 1. Evergreen and deciduous trees, with no more than 50 percent being deciduous, a o minimum of six feet in height, and planted at intervals no greater than 30 feet on 3 center, and 0 2. If planted to buffer a building elevation, shrubs, a minimum of three and one-half feet in height, and living ground cover planted so that the ground will be covered within three years, or 0 3. If planted to buffer a parking area, access, or site development other than a U) building, any of the following alternatives may be used unless otherwise noted: E a. Shrubs, a minimum of three and one-half feet in height, and living ground 2 cover must be planted so that the ground will be covered within three years. b. Earth -mounding, an average of three and one-half feet in height, planted CU with shrubs or living ground cover so that the ground will be covered within °� three years. This alternative may not be used in a downtown or waterfront � area. 2 c. A combination of earth mounding, opaque fences and shrubs to produce a c visual barrier at least three and one-half feet in height. c The landscaping shows along the north property line is consistent with the Type III criteria TYPE V Type V Landscaping. Type V landscaping is intended to provide visual relief and shade in parking areas. 1. Required Amount. a. If the parking area contains no more than 50 parking spaces, at least 17.5 square feet of landscape development must be provided as described in subsection (E)(2) of this section for each parking stall proposed. b. If the parking area contains more than 99 parking spaces, at least 35 square feet of landscape development must be provided as described in subsection (E)(2) of this section for each parking stall proposed. Page 12 of 16 Packet Pg. 115 Cascara Townhouses PLN2023-0029 c. If the parking area contains more than 50 but less than 100 parking spaces, the director — or his designee — shall determine the required amount of landscaping by interpolating between 17.5 and 35 square feet for each parking stall proposed. The area must be landscaped as described in subsection (E)(2) of this section. 2. Design. a. Each area of landscaping must contain at least 150 square feet of area and must be at least four feet in any direction exclusive of vehicle overhang. The area must contain at least one tree a minimum of six feet in height and with a minimum size of one and one-half inches in caliper if deciduous. The N remaining ground area must be landscaped with plant materials, decorative 0 mulch or unit pavers. 3 b. A landscaped area must be placed at the interior ends of each parking row in 0 a multiple -lane parking area. This area must be at least four feet wide and M must extend the length of the adjacent parking stall. M U c. Up to 100 percent of the trees proposed for the parking area maybe U) deciduous._. r d. Repealed by Ord. 4085. e. The minimum area per planter is 64 square feet. f. The maximum area per planter is 1,500 square feet for parking lots greater than 12,000 square feet. Planters shall be spread throughout the parking lot g. Shade trees are required at the rate of a minimum of one per planter and/or one per 150 square feet of planter. No landscaping is currently shown around the surface parking stalls but landscaping around that area is required and must meet the Type V criteria; a condition to that effect is proposed. Finally, per ECDC 20.13.020.E, automatic irrigation is required for this project, unless waived by the ADB. 9. ECDC 20.15A Environmental Review (SEPA) The scope of this project required an environmental threshold determination. The City of Edmonds acted as lead agency for SEPA review and issued a Determination of Nonsignificance on November 25, 2024 (Attachment 11). No comments or appeals have been received as of the date of this report. 10. ECDC 20.60 Sian Code Signage was not included with this proposal. Signage meeting the requirements of ECDC 20.60 is exempt from design review. Staff will review future sign permits to verify compliance with the sign code. Page 13 of 16 Packet Pg. 116 Cascara Townhouses PLN2023-0029 11. ECDC 23.10 Tree Related ReEulations New multifamily developments must provide a tree retention and protection plan that shows retention of at least 25% of all significant trees on the developable site. As indicated in the associated arborist report (Attachment 6), there are seven trees within the developable site that would be impacted by the proposal, all of which are in generally good condition. Two trees will be retained near the south edge of the site and included with the proposed landscaping in the area (Attachment 7), but five significant trees are proposed to be removed. For those two trees to be removed that are less than 24" DBH, replacement is required consistent with ECDC 23.10.080. For those three trees 24" or greater DBH, a fee -in -lieu payment is required. The arborist report will need to be updated during building permit review to be consistent with the requirements of ECDC 23.10 for tree replacement and for a calculation of fees -in -lieu. Required replacement trees may be used as part of the landscaping plan required by ECDC 20.13. 12. ECDC 23.40 Environmentally Critical Areas A critical area determination was completed for the site (CRA2007-0025), which identified no critical areas on or adjacent to the site. An updated critical area determination will be required with a subsequent building permit application. E. TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE In addition to the Planning Division, the Engineering Division evaluated the feasibility of the project relative to the Public Works Requirements in Title 18 ECDC and the Building Division and South County Fire did the same for the codes in Title 19 ECDC (Attachment 13). The Building Division had no specific concerns with the design review. Fire and Engineering had several comments, which will be added as proposed conditions. Traffic impact fees associated with the project are collected with the building permit. In the end, each group found the project to be feasible, with conditions, and will confirm code compliance at the building permit stage of the development review process. III. RECOMMENDATION Pursuant to ECDC 20.11.020, when recommending approval of applications, the ADB must find that the proposed development is consistent with the criteria listed in ECDC 20.11.030 (General Design Review), the Comprehensive Plan, and the zoning ordinance. Based on the findings, analysis, conclusions, and attachments with this report, staff recommends that the ADB APPROVE the design for the proposed Cascara Townhouse project with the following motion and recommended conditions of approval: THE ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN BOARD ADOPTS THE FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND ANALYSIS OF THE STAFF REPORT AND FINDS THAT, AS CONDITIONED, THE CASCARA TOWNHOUSE PROPOSAL IN FILE PLN2023-0029 IS CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, DESIGN CRITERIA OF ECDC 20.11.030, AND ZONING Page 14 of 16 Packet Pg. 117 Cascara Townhouses PLN2023-0029 REGULATIONS AND THEREFORE APPROVES THE DESIGN OF THE PROJECT WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. At least two of the criteria in ECDC 16.30.030(A) Sub 4(a) must be met in order to obtain the maximum 35 foot height for the north building fronting Edmonds Way. The applicant must indicate which criteria will be satisfied by the project. 2. The height of the south building as proposed exceeds the maximum 25 feet in accordance with the table in ECDC 16.30.030(A). The south building must be redesigned to meet that requirement or the project could be revised to only have one building that complies with the 35' height allowed per ECDC N 16.30.030(A) Sub 4(a). s 3. Electric vehicle charging must be shown at building permit and meet the c standards in ECDC 17.115. M L 4. Bicycle parking facilities must be shown at building permit and meet the y standards in ECDC 17.120. v 5. A shared parking agreement is required for the operation and maintenance of c the five surface parking stalls to the west of the shared driveway. 6. An updated critical area determination is required at building permit. s 7. Type V landscaping is required for the five surface parking stalls adjacent to the project site. a 8. Retained trees must be protected during development in accordance with °� ECDC 23.10.070. 9. The arborist report must be updated for the building permit application to ca v� include all trees being removed from the project site, and to address the c resulting replacement and fee -in -lieu requirements of ECDC 23.10. c 10. Street tree species will be determined by the Parks Department at building M N N permit. a 11. The Fire and Engineering comments in Attachment 13 are adopted as conditions that must be met at building permit. E 12. Staff will verify compliance of the proposal with all relevant codes and land use permit conditions through review of building, engineering, and fire permits. Minor changes to the approved design may be approved by staff at the time of building permit without further design review by the Board as long as the design is substantially similar to that originally approved. IV. PARTIES OF RECORD City of Edmonds Jake Lyon Cascara LLC Page 15 of 16 Packet Pg. 118 Cascara Townhouses PLN2023-0029 Matt Driscoll, D/Arch LLC (rep. Cascara LLC) mattd@darchllc.com V. APPEALS jake@westerlyre.com Genet Solomon & Desta Getachew genetsol@gmail.com destag@gmail.com According to ECDC 20.01.003.13 and 20.06.150, Type III -A decisions are not administratively appealable but rather subject to LUPA appeal at Snohomish County superior court pursuant to Chapter 36.70C RCW. VI. LAPSE OF APPROVAL According to ECDC 20.11.050.A, unless the owner submits a fully completed building permit application necessary to bring about the approved alterations, or, if no building permit application is required, substantially commences the use allowed within 18 months from the date of approval, ADB or hearing examiner approval shall expire and be null and void, unless the owner files a fully completed application for an extension of time prior to the expiration date. For the purposes of this section the date of approval shall be the date on which the ADB's or hearing examiner's minutes or other method of conveying the final written decision of the ADB or hearing examiner as adopted are mailed to the applicant. In the event of appeal, the date of approval shall be the date on which a final decision is entered by the city council or court of competent jurisdiction. Page 16 of 16 Packet Pg. 119 CITY OF EDMONDS Land Use Application #1313142 - Cascara Applicant First Name Last Name Matt Driscoll MyBuitdingPermit.com Company Name d/Arch LLC Number Street Apartment or Suite Number E-mail Address 2412 Westlake Ave N Ste 3 mattdna darchllc.com City State Zip Seattle WA 98109 Contractor Company Name Number Street City State License Number Project Location State Zip License Expiration Date UBI # Number Street 9516 EDMONDS WAY City Zip Code EDMONDS 98020 Associated Building Permit Number Additional Information (i.e. equipment location or special instructions). Work Location Property Owner Phone Number Extension (206) 547-1761 County Parcel Number 27033600100900 Tenant Name Apartment or Suite Number Phone Number Extension E-mail Address Floor Number Suite or Room Number First Name Last Name or Company Name CASCARA LLC Number Street Apartment or Suite Number 320 DAYTON ST 101 City State Zip EDMONDS WA 98020 Certification Statement - The applicant states: certify that I am the owner of this property or the owner's authorized agent. If acting as an authorized agent, I further certify that I have full power and authority to file this application and to perform, on behalf of the owner, all acts required to enable the jurisdiction to process and review such application. have furnished true and correct information. I will comply with all provisions of law and ordinance governing this type of application. If the scope of work requires a licensed contractor to perform the work, the information will be provided prior to permit issuance. Date Submitted: 5/10/2023 Submitted By: Matt Driscoll Atta PLN2 Packet Pg. 120 Page 1 of 2 CITY OF EDMONDS MyBuildingPermit.com Land Use Application #1313142 - Cascara Project Contact Company Name: d/Arch LLC Name: Matt Driscoll Email: mattd@darchllc.com Address: 2412 Westlake Ave N Ste 3 Phone #: (206) 547-1761 Seattle WA 98109 Project Type Activity Type Scope of Work New New Development Activity Design Review Project Name: Cascara Description of Work: Design Review approval of 6 Townhomes with 12 parking spaces Project Details Development Type Multifamily Page 2 of 2 Atta ' PLN2 Packet Pg. 121 MyBuildingPermit.com Jurisdiction: Edmonds Project Name: Cascara Application ID: 1313142 Supplemental Name: Applicant Certification - Planning The applicant, and his/her/its heirs, and assigns, in consideration on the processing of the application agrees to release, indemnify defend and hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any and all damages, including reasonable attorney's fees, arising from any action or infraction based in whole or part upon false, misleading, inaccurate or incomplete information furnished by the applicant, his/her/its agents or employees. The property affected by the application is in the exclusive ownership of the applicant or that the application has been submitted with the consent of all owners of the affected property. I certify, under the penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington, that the information and exhibits herewith submitte are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that I am authorized to file this application on behalf of the owner of the subje property. I do so certify. Packet Pg. 122 MyBuildingPermitxom Jurisdiction: Edmonds Project Name: Cascara Application 1D: 1313142 Supplemental Name: Land Use Application If this is a new parcel or lot that does not yet have an address or a County tax account number, please describe the property and its location (otherwise, you may skip this question): Please describe the project and/or proposed use(s) you are seeking approval for with this application (you can upload a more detaile file/letter later in the application, as necessary): Design Review approval of project with 6 townhomes and 12 parking spaces Check the boxes indicating all of the related approvals you are seeking for this project (including this application). NOTE THAT A SEPARATE APPLICATION I: REQUIRED FOR EACH APPROVAL. Design Review Atta PLN2 Packet Pg. 123 9516 Edmonds Way Cover Letter 05/08/2023 p. 1 /5 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project site is 11,571 sf. It is in the RM-EW Zone. Properties across Edmonds Way to the North are zoned BC-EW (Community Business, BC -Edmonds Way). East and West are Muti-family zones. South residential zones. To the Northwest, properties are zoned commercial WMU (Westgate Mixed Used). The project is a 6 townhouses with 12 parking stalls (garaged). Total building area is approximately 11,200 sf. N The building is 3 stories of Type V-A Wood construction. 0 _ Vehicular access is provided via a single curb cut/driveway in the middle of the site to 3 0 minimize its impact on vehicular and pedestrian activity. CU Pedestrian access is provided along Edmonds Way and next to a shared driveway with N adjacent property. A fire apparatus road is provided at the south end of the site in conjunction with the E parking access. A hammerhead terminates this fire apparatus road. 2. SITE DESCRIPTION The northern three-quarters of the site is relatively flat and level. Ground elevations range from approximately 338 feet near the northwest corner of the parcel to elevation 344 feet near the southeast property corner. The subject parcel, Parcel No. 27033600100900, is approximately 0.29 acres in size and is vacant. The site is bordered by undeveloped property to the southwest and residential developed properties to the northeast and southeast. 3. STANDARDS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND EDMONDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE The project is designed to comply with the requirements of the Edmonds city code and Community development code. The intended Multifamily use is permitted per 16.50.010 uses. The building setback allowed per 16.30.030, minimum street setback 15', minimum side setback 10', minimum rear setback 15'. The proposed site plan complies with setback requirements. Atta ' PLN2 Packet Pg. 124 9516 Edmonds Way Cover Letter 05/08/2023 p. 2/5 The building height allowed per 16.30.030. A is 25' and note #3 states: the maximum base height of any building fronting Edmonds Way may be increased to 35 feet. The proposed project is designed with modulated pitched roofs, and the height is below 35' maximum height requirement above average grade. The building is set back 15' from Edmonds Way to meet the setback. Required parking per 17.50.020 Parking is 1.8 parking spaces per dwelling units with 2 bedrooms. Each townhouse is provided with 2 stalls within the garage. N d Per 16.30.030.B Design Standard -Seventy-five percent of a building facade facing a o public right-of-way shall be clad with preferred building materials which include natural = stone, wood, architectural metal, brick and glass. Concrete, laminates, veneers, fiber o cement products and the like may be permitted if they replicate the appearance of the listed preferred materials. At least 55 percent of building facade materials must be CU salvaged, recycled content, bio-based or indigenous. The building materials proposed are designed to complement the massing of the building. The lower level will feature board and batten siding, which will provide a refined residential appearance while incorporating vertical expression that resembles the appearance of architectural metal. Meanwhile, the upper level will feature darker fiber cement panels to provide contrast and further enhance the building's aesthetic r r appeal. In addition, secondary design elements such as glass railings, wood soffit, and � an entryway canopy will be included to add depth and interest to the building's design. A. General Design Objectives a. Design Objectives for Site Design Design Objectives Analysis A.1 Vehicular Access Reduce the numbers Proposed shared and width of driveways driveway with neighbor (curb cuts) to improve project, which minimize pedestrian, bike, and the curb cut, and comply auto safety with fire department access requirements. A.2 Layout of Parking Parking should be Proposed parking placed to the site and garages for each rear. townhouse, which locate away from the public street, at the rear of the front row building. A.3 Connections On- Design site access The proposal is a and Offsite between sites to pedestrian -oriented encourage linkages for housing development. pedestrians, vehicles, The project will improve and bicycles. the pedestrian experience by overhead weather protection, Atta ' PLN2 Packet Pg. 125 9516 Edmonds Way Cover Letter 05/08/2023 p. 3/5 landscaping, and lighting. A.4 Building Entry Building entries should Secondary design Location be clear. elements such as paved pathway, wood soffit, and an entryway canopy will be incorporated to identify the residential entries. A.5 Setbacks Setbacks should be Front/side/rear setbacks appropriate to the will provide opportunity desired landscape. for landscaping and rest areas for pedestrians to provide relief from the public to private property. A.6 Open Space Create green spaces to Planting and appropriate enhance the visual lighting along the attributes of the building will be provided development. to create a pleasant pedestrian environment. A.7 Building/Site Identity Providing variety in The lower level will building form, colors, feature board and batten materials and siding, which will provide individuality of buildings. a refined residential appearance while incorporating vertical expression that resembles the appearance of architectural metal. Meanwhile, the upper level will feature darker fiber cement panels to provide contrast and further enhance the building's aesthetic appeal. A.8 Weather Protection Provide covered Canopies provided at the walkways and entries for residential entries. pedestrian weather protection A.9 Lighting Provide adequate and Perimeter and entrance appropriate illumination lighting provided around to support activity and the site. security a� w 3 O t 3 O M a N M U a, r as s �a a CU O a a� L �a N 0 0 M N 0 N z J (L a) E a Atta PLN2 Packet Pg. 126 9516 Edmonds Way Cover Letter 05/08/2023 p. 4/5 A.10 Signage Signage that provide Individual townhouse will clear information and have its own numbers direction. next to front doors. A.11 Site Utilities, Minimize the noise, Utility is located in Storage, Trash and M/E odor, and visual impacts between the two building system of utility systems. masses, away from public street. A.12 Integrating Site Integrate natural Landscape design is Features landscape features. consistent with overall architectural design and site plan. A.13 Landscape Buffers Use landscape and/or The proposal will provide other features such as abundant landscape fences to maintain green space along the privacy and visual street level. barrier. The proposed design provides a clear vehicular path sharing with adjacent property, while minimizing the impact on pedestrian sidewalks. Individual garages are provided for each townhouse, which minimize the visual impacts to the street. Each townhouse entrance is incorporated with overall design, by using landscaping, pathways, and architectural features to emphasize the visibility. b. Desian Obiectives for Buildina Form Design Objectives Analysis A.14 Building Form Avoid repetitive, The proposed project is monotonous building provided with forms. consistent design elements and material. A.15 Massing Reduce bulk and mass. The building fagade is breaking into three vertical portions, along with pitched roof design, which reducing the overall massing. A.16 Roof Modulation Use roof forms to help Pitched roof design identify different provided. programs A.17 Wall Modulations Variation in materials, The building materials decorative elements, to proposed are designed support pedestrian to complement the scale environments, massing of the building. and streetscapes or break up large building mass. Atta PLN2 Packet Pg. 127 9516 Edmonds Way Cover Letter 05/08/2023 p. 5/5 c. Design Objectives for Building FaQade Design Objectives Analysis A.18 Building Fagade Reinforce the The building design will Design appearance and contribute to the consistency of developing character of streetscape patterns. the neighborhood and in keeping with the modern design of the project. A.19 Window Variety Use window size and Large window openings and Articulation placement to help define provided, which is the scale and character consistency with the of the building. design. A.20 Variation in fagade Employ variation in The building materials Materials materials, colors, or proposed are designed design elements on to complement the building fagade. massing of the buildin . 4. Trash Pick Up The applicant called Republic Service on 05/04/2023. The representative agreed to the design proposal that each townhouse would have their own trash, recycle, composite bins. Owner of each townhouse can stage the bins in front of their garage door, and the driver from Republic Services will wheel them out and collect on pick up day. 10/25/2023 10:01 PM R:\2021d\2106d_9516 Edmonds Way\Edmonds\Design Review SubmittakArchitectural\Cover Letter _9516-Edmonds_ Way_ DesignReviewNarrative.docx a� w 3 0 s 3 0 M L �a N M U Atta PLN2 Packet Pg. 128 1 City of Edmonds Aerial Photo - 9516 Edmonds Way 9 '' h' .• ar ' 126.30 252.6 Feet 188.1 This ma is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and i 2,257 p � B p pp B reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accui S_1984_Web-Mercator _Auxiliary -Sphere current, or otherwise relic ity of Edmonds THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR DESIGN OR CONSTRUCT 1. '32 ti N 3 Legend t ArcSDE.GIS.STREET_CENTERLINE! C — <all other values> 1 2 (i 5; 4 9;71;7;8 N - Sections Boundary r+ y Sections Edmonds Boundary r ArcSDE.GIS.PROPERTY_BUILDIN( M ArcSDE.GIS.STREET_CENTERLINE' _ <all other values> Interstate G CL Principal Arterial i Minor Arterial; Collector Local Street N State Highways c <all other values> M 0 N Q 04 1 Z 2 IL County Boundary Parks E ArcSDE.GIS.PROPERTY_WASHIN( ArcSDE.GIS.PROPERTY_CITIES A—c— r-Ic —nn—V ri—C ram'+ Q FLNotesscara Design Review N2023-0029 Packet Pg. 129 LEGEND EX. \� >► ��o F.H. y kp0 a 10 V� F \f QO o \ X EX. W....................... . . (TO BE RELOCATED TO THE.�.'.: '.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.' KICK OF SIDEWALK)1. , ko0 ... EX. SSMH :: • ;.:'>.. '.'..' •o � ....'.'.RIM=338.59 .�.. �.. ,; %., ...... . �. i (TO BE RELOCATED 'y Q i ° ZN' TO PROPOSED MAILBOX CLUSTER)/ Ex., C.B., 60 RIM=339.15 00 I.E.=335.27 (18" SW, 12" NE).:.��'.. ............ EX. PQWEI �0 (TBRop � d 2 ) 4 Q / 6pk .............. ................... .... Q / ✓ \ \\1\\/ j . .... .... .... ...i. i......../ .............. .�....... / ................ ' ..i G0�0.. ., �. D PRC: 0+60.17 oo x VEHICULAR ENTRANCE AND EGRESS 1 / j " ° ��• % ° c d / /d$ d EASEMENT AGREEMENT (A. F. #21107 i _ ° Q `\ " / ° Q . 2n' W.N.G. EASEMENT (A. F. #9107250427) \ d ° Al 4 41. jo o 2 �� Q d 18' SEWER EASEMEN (A.F. J1982543 ° \ v TEMP. GRADING)\ EASEMENT SHORT PLA A.F. J2003011 \\ 4 /1 v \ 9530 EDMONDS WAY \ 5 \ v EDMONDS, WA 98020 i TEMP. CONSTRUCTION \ EASEMENT / DRIVEWAY SHARED WITH 9600 EDMONDS WAY AND TWO LOTS TO SOUTH \ Know what's below. FUTURE APARTMENT call before you dig. UTILITY CONFLICT NOTE. CAUTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING THE LOCATION, DIMENSION, AND DEPTH OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHETHER SHOWN ON THESE PLANS OR NOT, BY POTHOLING THE UTILITIES AND SURVEYING THE HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL LOCATION PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THIS AND THEN SHALL / \ INCLUDE CALLING UTILITY LOCATE @ 1-800-424-5555 POTHOLING ALL OF THE EXISTING UTILITIES AT LOCATIONS OF NEW UTILITY CROSSINGS TO PHYSICALLY / VERIFY WHETHER OR NOT CONFLICTS EXIST. LOCATIONS OF SAID UTILITIES AS / \ SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ARE BASED UPON THE UNVERIFIED PUBLIC INFORMATION AND ARE SUBJECT TO VARIATION. IF CONFLICTS SHOULD OCCUR, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSULT WITH INSIGHT ENGINEERING COMPANY TO RESOLVE ALL PROBLEMS PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH CONSTRUCTION. NE 114, SEC. 36, TWP. 27N. RGE. 3 E., W.M. KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON 5' PUD EASEMENT 1 \ I I SCALE: 1„ = 10' (A.F. #7603220241) 1 \y I I 10 5 0 10 20 9510 EDMONDS WAY EDMONDS, WA 98020 ' UTILITY CONTACT LIST STORMWATER: THE CITY OF EDMONDS 121 5TH AVE N. / EDMONDS, WA 98020 0 v PROTECTION(425) 771-0220 7 FENCE SANITARY SEWER: OLYMPIC VIEW WATER & SEWER DISTRICT 8128 228TH STREET SW EDMONDS, WA 98026 / (425) 774-7769 � WATER: OLYMPIC VIEW WATER &SEWER DISTRICT 8128 228TH STREET SW V EDMONDS, WA 98026 (425) 774-7769 ELECTRIC: SNOHOMISH COUNTY P.U.D. 9520 EDMONDS WAY 21018 HIGHWAY 99, EDMONDS, WA 98020 EDMONDS 98026 (425) 670-3200 GAS: PUGET SOUND ENERGY 10885 NE 4TH ST BELLEVUE, WA 98004 (425) 452-1234 CABLE: COMCAST 12645 STONE AVE N SEATTLE (877) 824-2288 FIRE DEPARTMENT: EDMONDS FIRE DISTRICT (SOUTH COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT #1) 121-5TH AVENUE NORTH (EDMONDS CITY HALL) FIRE MARSHAL: (425) 771-0213 SCHOOL: EDMONDS SCHOOL DISTRICT 20420 68TH AVE WEST LYNNWOOD, WA 98036 (425) 431-7000 REFUSE/RECYCLE: REPUBLIC SERVICES kp265 12 1600 127TH AVENUE NE A C/0' 4 BELLEVUE, WA. 98005 (206) 682-9730 new at aw �` EXISTING MONUMENT (AS SHOWN) �Oa SECTION 114 CORNER NOT FOUND �w SECTION CORNER NOT FOUND FOUND REBAR/CAP OR I.P. (IRON PIPE) EAmcn M' a' (C) CALCULATED (P) PLAT (M) MEASURED TBR TO BE REMOVED R.D.W. RIGHT-OF-WAY P.O.B. POINT OF BEGINNING T CENTERLINE CLF CHAIN LINK FENCE N WDF WOOD FENCE W.S. WATER SURFACE EOP EDGE OF PAVEMENT W E BOW BACK OF WALK VICINITYMAP CB STORM DRAIN CATCH BASIN (CB) S SCALE. 1 "=2000' ' O SD STORM DRAIN MANHOLE (SDMH) O SS SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE (SSMH) 000 SANITARY SEWER CLEAN OUT (CO) -0-P POWER POLE -0-cP GUY POLE ❑ WM WATER METER ><1 WATER VALVE WV PMB MAILBOX UTILITY POLE ANCHOR 'c1 FIRE HYDRANT (2 NOZZLE) E TYPE I NGPA SIGN - — — — — — — — - PROPOSED WATER PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER IMPERVIOUS AREAS BREAKDOWN PROPOSED STORM DRAINAGE TOTAL PGIS = 7,023 S.F. PROPERTY LINE TOTAL NPGIS = 4,709 S.F. X X EXISTING FENCE LINE TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA = 11,732 S.F. /// EDGE OF PAVEMENT - — — - XXX EXISTING CONTOURS EQUIPMENTAND PROCEDURE PROPOSED CONTOURS BASIS OF BEARING:SHORT PRE-EXISTING DRAINAGE PATTERN PLAT (A.F 1200301175007) UTILITIES (POWER, CABLE, TELEPHONE) TRANSFORMER BOX BM LEIPOWER VAULT SNO. CO. PT #23 MONUMENT IN CASE 92ND AVE. W. (TBR) TO BE REMOVED ELEV. = 367.97 FDC FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION — CENTERLINE DATUM: �XXX� PROPOSED CONTOUR NAVD 88 PROPOSED STORM w/CB N.A.V.D 88-3.64'=NGVD '29 (MSL) PROPOSED SEWER ENGINEER/CONTACT SURVEYOR BOUNDARY INSIGHT ENGINEERING COMPANY WEST ALLIANCE PROPOSED CONCRETE AREA PROPOSED ASPHALT EXISTING ASPHALT GAS GAS LINE —OH QH— OVERHEAD POWER LINE SD EXISING DRAINAGE FM FM EX. FORCE MAIN SS SS EX. SEWER W W EX. WATER SITE DATA AREA BREAKDOWN TOTAL SITE AREA UNITS PROPOSED EXISTING ZONING PROPOSED ZONING IMPERVIOUS SURFACE LOT COVERAGE REV. NO. BUILDING SETBA( STREET 15' SIDE 10' REAR 15' 11,833 SQ. FT - 0.27 ACRES 6 RS-8 RS-8 12,943 SF (0.29 AC) 28.01% P.O. BOX 1478 EVERETT, WA 98206 CONTACT: BRIAN R. KALAB, P.E. (425) 303-9363 OWNER/APPLICANT JAKE LYON WESTERLY, LLC 320 DAYTON ST, STE 101 EDMONDS, WA 98020 JAKE@WESTERLYRE.COM LEGAL DESCRIPTION p 13614 ASH WAY EVERETT, WA 98204 (509) 630-0783 EMAIL: MATRIXSURVEYOR@LIVECOM ALL THAT PORTION OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 27 NORTH, RANGE 3 EAST, W.M., DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SAID NORTH HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER DISTANT NORTH 88. 14' 33" EAST 90.00 FEET FROM THE SOUTHWEST CORNER THEREOF, • THENCE NORTH 02. 54' 05" WEST 274.02 FEET TO THE SOUTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF THE COUNTY ROAD (NOW STATE ROAD NO. 1-W); THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID ROAD MARGIN ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT; HAVING A RADIUS OF 1450.85 FEET AN ARC DISTANCE OF 12.46 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THIS DESCRIPTION, THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT AN ARC DISTANCE OF 91.53 FEET, • THENCE SOUTH 25. 29' 40" EAST 130 FEET,• THENCE SOUTH 48. 38' 13" 103.96 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF THE LAND CONVEYED TO TILLMAN BURTON DEARING AND WIFE BY DEED FILED FOR RECORD UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 1354369; THENCE ALONG SAID EAST LINE NORTH 25' 29' 40" WEST 103.95 FEET TO A POINT WHICH BEARS SOUTH 02. 54' 05" EAST FROM THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 02. 54' 05" WEST 31.48 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, EXCEPT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF WASHINGTON UNDER RECORDING NUMBERS 2206152 AND 2206153. SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. INSIGHT ENGINEERMS CO. P.O. BOX - 1478 EVERETT, WA 98206 (425) 303-9363 (425) 303-9362 FAX INFO@ INSIGHTENGINEERING.NET SITE ADDRESS: 9516 EDMONDS WAY EDMONDS, WA 98020 DESCRIPTION I INITIALS I DATE I TAX ACCOUNT NO.'S: 27033600100900 1011412024 PLN2023-0029 NE 114, SEC. 36, TWP. 27N. RGE. 3 E., W.M. CASCARA DWG FILENAME DESIGNED BY: DATE: I SCALE: JOB NO.: 221226-FINAL.DWG I DNK 0312812024 1 `10' 22-1226 SHEET SITE PLAN S 1 Attach e Packet Pg. 130 pl rxl?n,?,i_nn,?a EX. F.H. (1O BE RELOC47ED TO THE EX. C. B. RIM=339.15 / I.E.=335.27 (18" SW, 12" NE) d p EX. PC' d \ BACK OF SIDEWALK) =X. SSMH RIM=338.59 ' I.E.=329.87 '�'� '17 d d ° (TO BE RELOCATED TO PROPOSED /. MAILBOX CLUSTER) d ° d d ,a \ (TBR) ° \� \ ° BIKE � RACK ' d d J d / 8 d 4 d / Zi p a BIKE - \ d \ ASL EN NE 114, SEC. 36, TWP. 27N. RGE. 3 E., W.M. LEGEND KING COUNTY WASHINGTON u st sw � >� EXISTING MONUMENT (AS SHOWN) - - - - - - - - - PROPOSED WATER ; \\ E� SECTION 1/4 CORNER NOT FOUND PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER PROPOSED STORM DRAINAGE �\ SECTION CORNER NOT FOUND PROPERTY LINE ce�� X X EXISTING FENCE LINE t' FOUND REBAR/CAP OR I.P. (IRON PIPE) // // EDGE OF PAVEMENT (C) CALCULATED - - - - - - EXISTING CONTOURS POWER POLE (P) PLAT XXX PROPOSED CONTOURS (M) MEASURED PRE-EXISTING DRAINAGE PATTERN ,N ail TBR TO BE REMOVED UTILITIES (POWER, CABLE, TELEPHONE) R.O.W. RIGHT-OF-WAY ' F11 TRANSFORMER BOX EASEMENTEEI P.O.B. POINT OF BEGINNING POWER VAULT 1 ;03220241) CENTERLINE (IBR) TO BE REMOVED N I � CLF CHAIN LINK FENCE I WDF WOOD FENCE FDC FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION - CENTERLINE SCALE: 1 = 10� W. S. WATER SURFACE XXX PROPOSED CONTOUR W E , EOP EDGE OF PAVEMENT = PROPOSED STORM w/CB VICINITY MAP �- a BOW BACK OF WALK S SCALE. 1"=2000' : 10 5 0 10 20 PROPOSED SEWER BIKE - e 49107250427) TH-3 \ \ i / TH-2 d\ . p / \ 1 PRO OSED MAILBOX LO T OIV d d d d \ \ STA: 1 +57.71 14.8.'L. D G d d_ . 5' ' VEHICULAR ENTRANCE AND EGRESS / / p \ LV d. d EASEMENT AGREEMENT (A.F. #211071 s a d 20' W,N,G�EASEMENT (A.F. #91072xz^ a a p p TH-6 41' E . . SS S4 •'..d° / D TH-5 p / ' d a 18' SEWER EASEMEN, _ (A.F. 11982543 ° TH-4 15`- TEMP. GRADING)\ \`/ 3 EASEMENT 4 5 \ a j / ° . .� . PROTECTION 9530 EDMONDS WAY a b / FENCE EDMONDS, WA 98020 / TEMP. CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT / \ DRIVEWAY SHARED WITH 9600 EDMONDS WAY AND TWO LOTS TO SOUTH Know what's below. \ / Call before you dig.\/' \ UTILITY CONFLICT NOTE. CAUTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING THE LOCATION, \ DIMENSION, AND DEPTH OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHETHER SHOWN ON THESE PLANS OR NOT, BY POTHOLING THE UTILITIES AND SURVEYING THE HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL LOCATION PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THIS AND THEN SHALL INCLUDE CALLING UTILITY LOCATE @ 1-800-424-5555 POTHOLING ALL OF THE EXISTING UTILITIES AT LOCATIONS OF NEW UTILITY CROSSINGS TO PHYSICALLY VERIFY WHETHER OR NOT CONFLICTS EXIST. LOCATIONS OF SAID UTILITIES AS \ SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ARE BASED UPON THE UNVERIFIED PUBLIC INFORMATION AND ARE SUBJECT TO VARIATION. IF CONFLICTS SHOULD OCCUR, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSULT WITH INSIGHT ENGINEERING COMPANY TO RESOLVE ALL PROBLEMS PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH CONSTRUCTION. / 9520 EDMONDS WAY EDMONDS, WA 98020 0 CB STORM DRAIN CATCH BASIN (CB) O SD STORM DRAIN MANHOLE (SDMH) BOUNDARY O SS SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE (SSMH) PROPOSED CONCRETE AREA 000 SANITARY SEWER CLEAN OUT (CO) PROPOSED ASPHALT _C)_P POWER POLE EXISTING ASPHALT OP GUY POLE GAS GAS LINE ❑ WM WATER METER -OH-OH- OVERHEAD POWER LINE 9510 EDMONDS WAY >< WATER VALVE SD EXISING DRAINAGE EDMONDS, WA 98020 Pm MAILBOX FM FM EX. FORCE MAIN E-- UTILITY POLE ANCHOR SS SS EX. SEWER FIRE HYDRANT (2 NOZZLE) W W EX. WATER TYPE I NGPA SIGN CASCARA NOTES: 1. A SEPARATE RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ALL WORK WITHIN THE CITY RIGHT-OF-WAY. 2. ADDRESS SIGN FOR FIRE -AID TO BE MOUNTED ON WEST WALL OF BUILDING-1 FACING SHARED DRIVEWAY. J. THE CONTRACTOR/PROPERTY OWNER TO CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION BY EMAIL AT ENGINEERINGPERMITS@EDMONDSWA.GOV 2-WEEKS IN ADVANCE OF THE REQUESTED SIGN FABRICATION. SHEETINDEX S 1 SITE PLAN C1.0 COVER SHEET C1.1 EXISTING FEATURES MAP C2.0 GRADING PLAN C2.1 SWPP PLAN C2.2 GRADING AND TESC NOTES AND DETAILS C3.0 ROAD, DRAINAGE AND UTILITY PLAN C3.1 SHARED DRIVEWAY PROFILE C3.2 DRAINAGE DETAILS C3.3 STORMTANK DETAILS C3.4 STORMTANK DETAILS C4.0 FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS C5.0 GENERAL NOTES AND DETAILS C6.0 POST OFFICE APPROVAL PLAN CT O TREE RETENTION PLAN C8.0 SEWER & WATER PLAN C8.1 SEWER NOTES AND DETAILS IMPERVIOUS AREAS BREAKDOWN TOTAL PGIS = 7,023 S. F. TOTAL NPGIS = 4,709 S.F. TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA = 11,732 S.F. EQUIPMENT AND PROCEDURE BASIS OF BEARING: SHORT PLAT (A.F. #200301175007) BM SNO. CO. PT. #23 MONUMENT IN CASE - 92ND AVE. W. ELEV = 367.97 DATUM: NAVD 88 N.A.V.D 88-3.64'=NGVD '29 (MSL) E'NGINLER/CONTACT SURVEYOR INSIGHT ENGINEERING COMPANY WEST ALLIANCE t 45fi PI �' P.O. BOX 1478 13614 ASH WAY EVERETT WA 98206 EVERETT WA 98204 CONTACT: BRIAN R. KALAB, P.E. (509) 630-078J (425) 303-9363 EMAIL: MATRIXSURVEYOR@LIVE.COM OWNER /APPLICANT JAKE LYON WESTERLY, LLC 320 DAYTON ST, STE 101 EDMONDS, WA 98020 JAKE@WESTERLYRE. COM LEGAL DESCRIPTION ALL THAT PORTION OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 27 NORTH, RANGE 3 EAST, W.M., DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SAID NORTH HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER BUILDING SE7BACKS DISTANT NORTH 88. 14' 33" EAST 90.00 FEET FROM THE SOUTHWEST FRONT 15' CORNER THEREOF, • THENCE NORTH 02. 54' 05" WEST 274.02 FEET TO THE SOUTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF THE COUNTY ROAD (NOW STATE ROAD SIDE 10' NO. 1-W); THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID ROAD MARGIN ON A BACK 15' CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 1450.85 FEET AN ARC DISTANCE OF 12.46 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THIS SOIL TYPL' DESCRIPTION, THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT AN ARC DISTANCE OF 91.53 FEET, • THENCE SOUTH 25. 29' 40" EAST 130 EVERETT, PITS AND ALDERWOOD SOIL FEET, • THENCE SOUTH 48. 38' 13" 103.96 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF THE LAND CONVEYED TO TILLMAN BURTON DEARING AND WIFE BY DEED FILED FOR RECORD UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 1354369; THENCE ALONG SAID EAST LINE NORTH 25' 29' 40" WEST 103.95 FEET TO A GRADING QUANTITIES.• POINT WHICH BEARS SOUTH 02. 54' 05" EAST FROM THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 02' 54' 05" WEST 31.48 FEET TO THE CUT. 50 Cu.Yds. TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE STATE FILL: 350 Cu.Yds. OF WASHINGTON UNDER RECORDING NUMBERS 2206152 AND 2206153. SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. (GRADING QUANTITIES WERE CALCULATED USING THE LAND DEVELOPMENT DESKTOP COMPOSITE METHOD. CALCULATIONS DO NOT ACCOUNT FOR SOIL SWELLING AND SHRINKAGE.) UTILITIES SEWER OLYMPIC VIEW SEWER AND WATER DISTRICT WATER OLYMPIC VIEW SEWER AND WATER DISTRICT IL POWER SNOHOMISH COUNTY P.U.D. TELEPHONE COMCAST ELECTRICT SNOHOMISH COUNTY P.U.D. SCHOOLS EDMONDS SCHOOL DISTRICT 1 NSIGHT E N61 H E Ro FIG CO. FIRE DISTRICT EDMONDS SOUTH COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT #1 STORMWATER CITY OF EDMONDS P.O. BOX - 1478 REFUSE/RECYCLE REPUBLIC SERVICES EVERETT, WA 98206 REV. NO. I DESCRIPTION 1011412024 (425) 303-9363 (425) 303-9362 FAX INFO@ INS IGHTENGINEERING.NET SITE ADDRESS: 9516 EDMONDS WAY EDMONDS, WA 98020 INITIALS I DATE TAX ACCOUNT NO.'S: 270JJ600100900 PLN2023-0029 NE 1/4, SEC. 36, TW . 27N. RGE. 3 E., W.M. CASCARA DWG FILENAME DESIGNED BY: DATE: SCALE: JOB NO.: 221226-FINAL.DWG I DNK 0312812024 1 "=10' 1 22-1226 SHEET COVER SHEET C1.0 Attach a Packet Pg. 131 PI n17n7'i_nn7a N N 3 0 t 3 0 H m �a fi N R U I PI ni7n7'i_nn7a I PI ni7n7'i_nn7a lDl NE 114, SEC. 36, TWP. 27N. RGE. 3 E., W.M. KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON SCALE: V = 10' 10 5 0 10 20 CONSTRUCTIONSEQUENCE 1. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SCHEDULE AND ATTEND PRE -CONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE WITH THE CITY ENGINEERING DIVISION AT (425) 771-0220, EXT. 1326. TWO DAYS (48 HRS) NOTICE IS REQUIRED. 2. FLAG CLEARING LIMITS AND INSTALL SILT FENCE AS SHOWN. J. INSTALL ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE. 4. CLEAR AND GRUB ROAD AREAS, AND STOCKPILE AREAS. INSTALL TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL BMP's SUCH AS INTERCEPTOR TRENCHES, CHECK DAMS, ETC. 5. GRADE AND STABILIZE ROAD WITH GRAVEL BASE. COVER EXPOSED SOILS WITH MULCH, HOG FUEL OR HYDROSEED. 6. INSTALL EROSION CONTROL BMP'S. 7. COVER EXPOSED SOILS WITH MULCH, HOG FUEL OR HYDROSEED. 8. CONSTRUCT SEWER, WATER AND STORM UTILITIES. INSTALL GAS, POWER, TELEPHONE AND CABLE UTILITIES, AS REQUIRED. LEAVE 1-2 FEET OF SOIL WHERE ROAD IS LOCATED, TO PROTECT INFILTRATION. WATER SHALL REMAIN AT THE SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION AND SHALL BE PROTECTED BY A BACKFLOW/AVB. 9. PLACE AND POUR CURBS AND GUTTERS. 10. PAVE ROADS WITH ATB AND PLACE DETENTION SYSTEM INTO FULL OPERATION. 11. HYDROSEED REMAINING EXPOSED SOILS AND STABILIZE PROJECT. 12. REMOVE SEDIMENTATION TRAPPED SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED OR STABILIZED ON SITE. DISTURBED SOIL AREAS RESULTING FROM REMOVAL SHALL BE PERMANENTLY STABILIZED. 13. ALL TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE REMOVED WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER FINAL SITE STABILIZATION IS ACHIEVED OR AFTER THE TEMPORARY BMP's ARE NO LONGER NEEDED. SILT FENCE SHALL BE PLACED WHERE STORMTANK IS PROPOSED TO PREVENT COMPACTION OF SOIL. ONSITE STORMWA TER MANAGEMENT: BMP T5.13 POST- CONS TR UCTION SOIL SOIL RETENTION: THE DUFF LAYER AND NATIVE TOPSOIL SHOULD BE RETAINED IN AN UNDISTURBED STATE TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PRACTICABLE. IN ANY AREAS REQUIRING GRADING REMOVED AND STOCKPILE THE DUFF LATER AND TOPSOIL ON SITE IN A DESIGNATED, CONTROLLED AREA, NOT ADJACENT TO PUBLIC RESOURCES AND CRITICAL AREAS, TO BE REAPPLIED TO OTHER PORTIONS OF THE SITE WHERE FEASIBLE. TEMP. 12" CULVERT / SOIL QUALITY. ALL AREAS SUBJECT TO CLEARING AND GRADING THAT / �O� HAVE NOT BEEN COVERED BY IMPERVIOUS SURFACE, INCORPORATED INTO A DRAINAGE FACILITY OR ENGINEERED AS STRUCTURAL FILL OR SLOPE SHALL, AT PROJECT COMPLETION, DEMONSTRATE THE FOLLOWING: 1. A TOPSOIL LAYER WITH A MINIMUM ORGANIC MATTER CONTENT OF TEN PERCENT DRY WEIGHT IN PLANTING BEDS, AND 57. ORGANIC MATTER CONTENT (BASED ON A LOSS ON -IGNITION TEST) IN TURF AREAS, AND A PH FROM 6.0 TO 8.0 OR MATCHING THE PH OF THE ORIGINAL UNDISTURBED SOIL. THE TOPSOIL LAYER SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM DEPTH OF EIGHT INCHES EXCEPT WHERE TREE ROOTS LIMIT THE DEPTH OF INCORPORATION OF AMENDMENTS NEEDED TO MEET THE CRITERIA. SUBSOILS BELOW THE TOPSOIL LAYER SHOULD IC7 / / / \ BE SCARIFIED AT LEAST 4 INCHES WITH SOME INCORPORATION OF THE UPPER MATERIAL TO AVOID STRATIFIED LAYERS, WHERE FEASIBLE. 2. PLANTING BEDS MUST BE MULCHED WITH 2 INCHES OF ORGANIC MATERIAL 14 J. QUALITY OF COMPOST AND OTHER MATERIALS USED TO MEET THE ORGANIC CONTENT REQUIREMENTS: A. THE ORGANIC CONTENT FOR 'PRE -APPROVED" AMENDMENT RATES CAN BE MET ONLY USING COMPOST THAT MEETS THE DEFINITION OF "COMPOSTED MATERIALS" IN WAC 173-350-220. THIS CODE IS AVAILABLE ONLINE AT.• / \ tit / HTTP:,Z/WWW.ECY.WA.GOV/PROGRAM/SWFA/FACILITIES/350.HTML. IKIICOMPOST USED IN BIORETENTION AREAS SHOULD BE STABLE, �/ i / / MATURE AND DERIVED FROM YARD DEBRIS, WOOD WASTE, OR CL OTHER ORGANIC MATERIALS THAT MEET THE INTENT OF THE N / ORGANIC SOIL AMENDMENT SPECIFICATIONS. BIOSOLIDS AND MANURE COMPOSTS CAN BE HIGHER IN BIO-AVAILABLE \ \ / PHOSPHORUS THAN COMPOST DERIVED FROM YARD OR PLANT WASTE AND THEREFORE ENTION AREAS DUE TOTHE IPOSSIBILITY OF EXPORTING BIOE AVAILABLE \ \ / PHOSPHORUS IN EFFLUENT. THE COMPOST MUST ALSO HAVE AN \ \ ORGANIC MATTER CONTENT OF 357. TO 657., AND CARBON TO NITROGEN RATION BELOW 25:1. THE CARBON TO NITROGEN RATIO TEMP. GRADING / / / �� MAY BE AS HIGH AS 35:1 FOR PLANTING COMPOSED ENTIRELY EASEMENT / / // / OF PLANTS NATIVE TO THE PUGET SOUND LOWLANDS REGION. �+ i B. CALCULATED AMENDMENT RATES MAY BE MET THROUGH USE OF PROTECTION COMPOSTED MATERIALS AS DEFINED ABOVE, OR ORGANIC �TYP.� MATERIALS AMENDED TO MEET THE CARBON TO NITROGEN RATIO MD MEETING THE CONTAMINANT STANDARDS OF GRADE ACOMPOST. TEMP. CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT Know what's below. Call before you dig. UTILITY CONFLICT NOTE. CAUTION.• THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING THE LOCATION, DIMENSION, AND DEPTH OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHETHER SHOWN ON THESE PLANS OR NOT, BY POTHOLING THE UTILITIES AND SURVEYING THE HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL LOCATION PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THIS AND THEN SHALL INCLUDE CALLING UTILITY LOCATE @ 1-800-424-5555 POTHOLING ALL OF THE EXISTING UTILITIES AT LOCATIONS OF NEW UTILITY CROSSINGS TO PHYSICALLY VERIFY WHETHER OR NOT CONFLICTS EXIST. LOCATIONS OF SAID UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ARE BASED UPON THE UNVERIFIED PUBLIC INFORMATION AND ARE SUBJECT TO VARIATION. IF CONFLICTS SHOULD OCCUR, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSULT WITH INSIGHT ENGINEERING COMPANY TO RESOLVE ALL PROBLEMS PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH CONSTRUCTION. 1 L 1 Vl./ REV. NO. I DESCRIPTION I INITIALS I DATE 1011412024 THE 13 ELEMENTS OF TESL BMP ELEMENT #1 - MARK CLEARING LIMITS: LIMIT OF CONSTRUCTION ARE CLEARLY MARKED. (C233 SILT FENCE) ELEMENT #2 - ESTABLISH CONSTRUCTION ACCESS: A STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE IS SHOWN. (C105 STABLIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE) ELEMENT #3 - CONTROL FLOW RATES. C240 SEDIMENT TRAP IS PROPOSED. ELEMENT #4 - INSTALL SEDIMENT CONTROLS: C233 SILT FENCE, C240 SEDIMENT TRAP ARE PROPOSED. ELEMENT #5 - STABILIZE SOILS. SOIL STABILIZATION IS ACHIEVED BY C121 MULCHING, C140 DUST CONTROL, C123 PLASTIC COVERING AND C120 SEEDS. ELEMENT #6 - PROTECT SLOPES: C 120 SEEDS, C 121 MULCHING, C 123 PLASTIC COVERS, C 120 INTERCEPTOR DIKES AND CHANNELS ARE PROPOSED. ELEMENT #7- PROTECT DRAIN INLETS: C220 INLET PROTECTIONS ARE PROPOSED FOR THE STORM DRAINS. ELEMENT#8 - STABILIZE CHANNELS AND OUTLETS: N/A ELEMENT #9 - CONTROL POLLUTANTS: ALL VEHICLES, EQUIPMENT AND PETROLEUM PRODUCT STORAGE/DISPERSING AREAS WILL BE INSPECTED REGULARLY TO DETECT ANY LEAKS OF SPILLS, AND TO IDENTIFY MAINTENANCE NEEDS AND PREVENT LEAKS OF SPILLS. C153 MATERIAL DELIVERY, STORAGE AND CONTAINMENT, C151 CONCRETE HANDLING, C152 SAWCUTTING AND SURFACING POLLUTION PROTECTION ARE ALSO PROPOSED. ELEMENT #10 - CONTROL DEWATERING: THERE WILL BE NO DEWATERING AS PART OF THIS CONSTRUCTION PROJECT. ELEMENT #11- MAINTAIN BMP's: C160 CESCL AND C150 MATERIALS ON HAND ARE PROPOSED. ELEMENT #12 - MANAGE THE PROJECT.• C160 CESCL, C162 SCHEDULING AND C150 MATERIALS ON HAND ARE PROPOSED. ELEMENT #13 - PROTECT ON -SITE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT BMP'S FOR RUNOFF FROM ROOFS AND OTHER HARD SURFACES: STOCKPILE EXISTING TOPSOIL PER SOIL AMENDMENT CALCULATION PER BMP T5.13. COVER STOCKPILE WITH PLASTIC COVERING TO PREVENT EROSION. SILT FENCE IS ALSO PROPOSED AROUND STORMTANK LOCATION TO PREVENT COMPACTION AND SCARIFY THE SOIL. C233 SILT FENCE IS PROPOSED AROUND STORMTANK. SEDIMENT TRAP INFLOW (2 YR/24 HR) 0.08 cfs SURFACE REQ'D 167 SF POND TOP ELEV EL=340.00 POND BOTTOM ELEV EL=336.50 EMERGENCY OVERFLOW SPILLWAY ELEV= EL=339.00 (L=6 ) SURFACE AREA PROVIDED 397 SF (EL=339.00) AhOTF 1. ANY SOIL REMOVED FROM THE SITE MUST BE HAULED TO A CITY APPROVED SITE. 2. THE EXISTING SIDEWALK FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE MAINTAINED AS LONG AS POSSIBLE DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION. DISRUPTION FEES SHALL ACCRUE AT A DAILY RATE FOR ALL CLOSURES EXTENDING OVER 72 HOURS. TESCLEGE0 INTERCEPTOR TRENCH w/ ROCK CHECK DAM SF SF SILT FENCE 2 2. TEMPORARY 3 CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE 2. CATCH BASIN INSERT 4 PROTECTION (TYP.) 2. CLEARING LIMITS CL M� f MULCH &/OR STRAW MATTING �L PLASTIC COVER FLOW ARROW (EX.) CITY OF EDMONDS APPROVED FOR CONSTR UCTION FOR: . PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR DATE INSIGHT EN61H� ikWNO CO. P.O. BOX - 1478 EVERETT, WA 98206 (425) 303-9363 (425) 303-9362 FAX INFO@ INS IGHTENGINEERING.NET SITE ADDRESS: 9516 EDMONDS WAY EDMONDS, WA 98020 TAX ACCOUNT NO.'S: 27033600100900 PLN2023-0029 NE 114, SEC. 36, TWP. 27N. RGE. 3 E., W.M. CASCARA W m 0 t c 0 H W m U DWG FILENAME DESIGNED BY: DATE: I SCALE: JOB NO.: 221226-FINAL.DWG I DNK 0312812024 1-10' 22-1226 SHEET SWPP PLAN C2.1 Attach a Packet Pg. 134 pl rxI?n*?,i_nn,?a R ISILT FENCE 1, F��L EX. GROUND LINE 2.1 c�T CLEARING LIMIT AND SILT FENCE SHALL BE -I S PLACED ON THE PROPERTY LINE. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. TYPICAL CONSTR UCTION SETBA CADETAIL NOT TO SCALE LLS A TH IN DE FULL WIDTH GRESS/EGRESS DETAIL NOTES: 1O THE MINIMUM LENGTH SHALL BE EXTENDED AS NECESSARY TO ENSURE MATERIAL IS NOT TRACKED OFF SITE AND/OR INTO THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. t�2 ATB DRIVEWAY RAMP AND/OR SITE ACCESS ROAD 15' WIDE MIN. SEE TABLE BELOW FOR REQUIRED LENGTH. NOTES: 1. SURFACE WATER - ALL SURFACE WATER FLOWING OR DIVERTED TOWARD CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES SHALL BE PIPED ACROSS THE ENTRANCE. IF PIPING IS IMPRACTICAL, A MOUNTABLE BERM WITH 5:1 SLOPES WILL BE PERMITTED. 2. MAINTENANCE - THE ENTRANCE SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION WHICH WILL PREVENT TRACKING OR FLOWING OF SEDIMENT OFF SITE AND/OR ONTO PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. THIS MAY REQUIRE PERIODIC TOP DRESSING WITH ADDITIONAL QUARRY SPALLS AS CONDITIONS DEMAND AND REPAIR AND/OR CLEANOUT OF ANY MEASURES USED TO TRAP SEDIMENT. ALL SEDIMENT SPILLED, DROPPED, WASHED OR TRACKED OFF SITE AND/OR ONTO PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY MUST BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY. 3. WHEELS SHALL BE CLEANED TO REMOVE SEDIMENT PRIOR TO LEAVING THE SITE. WHEN WASHING IS USED, IT SHALL BE DONE ON AN AREA STABILIZED WITH QUARRY SPALLS AND WHICH DRAINS INTO AN APPROVED SEDIMENT TRAPPING DEVICE. 4.INSPECTION AND NEEDED MAINTENANCE SHALL BE PROVIDED AFTER EACH RAIN. PROJECT SIZE MIN LENGTH OF (FEET) QUARRY SPALLS* < 1/4 ACRE 30 < 1 ACRE 50 < 3 ACRE 100 > 3 ACRE 100 ■ -1 . I U - • PROVIDE ATB OR ASPHALT TRANSITION WHERE FRONTAGE ROAD IS AN ARTERIAL LENGTH TO BE DETERMINED BY CITY INSPECTOR. CITY INSPECTION REQUIRED ON ALL EROSION CONTROL METHODS BEFORE OTHER WORK CAN BEGIN CITY OF EDMONDS STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT APPROVED BY: R. ENGLISH STABILIZED CONSTRUCTIONENTRANCE NOT TO SCALE CITY OF EDMODNS STD DTL ER-901 REVISION DATE JANUARY 2018 STANDARD D ETAI L ER-901 2" x 2" WOOD/STEEL FILTER FABRIC SECURED TO 2" x 2" 14 GA WIRE FABRIC EQUAL 13 NATIVE BACKFILL MATERIAL I 0 I N 8" NE 114, SEC. 36, TWP. 27N. RGE. 3 E., W.M. KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON FILTER FABRIC MATERIAL IN CONTINOUS ROLLS USE STAPLES OR WIRE RINGS TO ATTACH FABRIC TO WIRE 2" x 2" WOOD/STEEL POSTS In n NOTES: 1. CONTRACTOR/DEVELOPER SHALL MAINTAIN AND ENSURE PROPER EROSION CONTROL THROUGHOUT PROJECT. CITY INSPECTION REQUIRED ON 2. SILT FENCE TO BE PLACED DOWNSLOPE OF CONSTRUCTION ALL EROSION CONTROL METHODS ACTIVITY. BEFORE OTHER WORK CAN BEGIN `-St. 18y3' REVISION DATE CITY OF EDMONDS LA ILTER FABRIC FENCE JANUARY 2018 ILTRATION SYSTEMS PUBLIC WORKS STANDARD DEPARTMENT DETAIL ROVED BY: R. ENGLISH E R- 9 0 0 2 FILTER FABRICFENCEDETAIL 2. NTS CITY OF EDMONDS STD DTL ER-900 O O O J S FLTER SOCK WITH OVER FLOW HOLES + ' (n,P) a a ft d GRATE FILTER SOCK WITH OVER FLOW HOLES (TYP) CATCH BASIN NOTES: CATCH BASIN 1. CONTRACTOR/DEVELOPER SHALL MAINTAIN THIS APPLICATION AT ALL TIMES DURING CONSTRUCTION PERIOD. 2. ANY SEDIMENT IN CATCH BASIN INSERT SHALL BE REMOVED WHEN INSERT IS ONE-THIRD FULL. 3. CITY INSPECTION REQUIRED ON ALL EROSION CONTROL METHODS BEFORE OTHER WORK CAN BEGIN. t-9 CITY OF EDMONDS TEMPORARY SEDIMENT TRAP PUBLIC WORKS FOR CATCH BASINS DEPARTMENT APPROVED BY: R. ENGLISH TEMPORARYSEDIMENT TRAP FOR CATCHBASINS NTS CITY OF EDMONDS STD DTL ER-901 Know what's below. Cal before you dig. REv No. UTILITY CONFLICT NOTE. CAUTION.• THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING THE LOCATION, DIMENSION, AND DEPTH OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHETHER SHOWN ON THESE PLANS OR NOT, BY POTHOLING THE UTILITIES AND SURVEYING THE HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL LOCATION PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THIS AND THEN SHALL INCLUDE CALLING UTILITY LOCATE Cal 1-800-424-5555 POTHOLING ALL OF THE EXISTING UTILITIES AT LOCATIONS OF NEW UTILITY CROSSINGS TO PHYSICALLY VERIFY WHETHER OR NOT CONFLICTS EXIST. LOCATIONS OF SAID UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ARE BASED UPON THE UNVERIFIED PUBLIC INFORMATION AND ARE SUBJECT TO VARIATION. IF CONFLICTS SHOULD OCCUR, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSULT WITH INSIGHT ENGINEERING COMPANY TO RESOLVE ALL PROBLEMS PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH CONSTRUCTION. ESC NOTES (ECDC 18.30.050) A. ESC MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS. ALL ACTIVITIES NECESSITATING A CLEARING OR GRADING PERMIT AND ALL UTILITY PROJECTS CONSISTING OF MORE THAN 500 LINEAL FEET OF TRENCH EXCAVATION SHALL BE REQUIRED TO CONTROL EROSION AND SEDIMENT DURING CONSTRUCTION AND TO PERMANENTLY STABILIZE EXPOSED SOIL RESULTING FROM CONSTRUCTION. PROJECTS INVOLVING A CRITICAL AREA MAY ALSO BE REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH ANY COMBINATION OF THE ESC MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS. COMPLIANCE WILL BE DEMONSTRATED THROUGH THE IMPLEMENTATION OF AN APPROVED ESC PLAN. GUIDELINES FOR PREPARING ESC PLANS ARE PROVIDED IN THE MANUAL. THE PLAN MUST ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS: 1. ESC MINIMUM REQUIREMENT - CONSTRUCTION ACCESS ROUTE. CONSTRUCTION VEHICLE ACCESS SHALL BE, WHENEVER PRACTICAL, LIMITED TO ONE ROUTE. ACCESS POINTS SHALL BE STABILIZED WITH QUARRY SPALLS OR CRUSHED ROCK TO MINIMIZE THE TRACKING OF SEDIMENT ONTO PUBLIC ROADS. IF SEDIMENT IS TRANSPORTED ONTO A ROAD SURFACE, THE ROADS SHALL BE CLEANED THOROUGHLY AT THE END OF EACH DAY. SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED FROM ROADS BY SHOVELING OR SWEEPING AND BE TRANSPORTED TO A CONTROLLED SEDIMENT DISPOSAL AREA WITHIN 24 HOURS. STREET WASHING SHALL BE ALLOWED ONLY AFTER SEDIMENT IS REMOVED IN THIS MANNER. 2. ESC MINIMUM REQUIREMENT - STABILIZATION OF EXPOSED AREAS. ALL SOILS EXPOSED BY LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES SHALL BE STABILIZED BY SUITABLE APPLICATION OF BMPS, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, SOD, HYDROSEEDING, OR OTHER VEGETATION, PLASTIC COVERING, OR MULCHING. ALL BMPS SHALL BE SELECTED, DESIGNED, AND MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUAL. THE EXPOSED SOILS SHALL BE STABILIZED ACCORDING TO AN APPROVED TIMETABLE. (TYPICALLY, NO SOILS SHALL REMAIN EXPOSED FOR MORE THAN TWO DAYS FROM OCTOBER 1 THROUGH APRIL 30 AND NO MORE THAN SEVEN DAYS FROM MAY 1 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 30). J. ESC MINIMUM REQUIREMENT - PROTECTION OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES. ADJACENT PROPERTIES SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM SEDIMENT DEPOSITION BY APPROPRIATE USE OF VEGETATIVE BUFFER STRIPS, SEDIMENT BARRIERS OR FILTERS, DIKES OR MULCHING, OR BY A COMBINATION OF THESE MEASURES AND OTHER APPROPRIATE BMPS. 4. ESC MINIMUM REQUIREMENT - MAINTENANCE. ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS SHALL BE REGULARLY INSPECTED AND MAINTAINED BY THE OWNER TO ENSURE CONTINUED PERFORMANCE OF THEIR INTENDED FUNCTION. ALL MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR SHALL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUAL. 5. ESC MINIMUM REQUIREMENT - OTHER BMPS. AS REQUIRED BY THE CITY, OTHER APPROPRIATE BMPS TO MITIGATE THE EFFECTS OF INCREASED RUNOFF SHALL BE APPLIED. 6. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL REQUIREMENT - UNDERGROUND UTILITY CONSTRUCTION. THE CONSTRUCTION OF UNDERGROUND UTILITY LINES SHALL SPECIFICALLY ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING: A. EROSION CONTROL FOR EXCAVATED AND STOCKPILED MATERIALS, B. THE PLACEMENT OF EXCAVATED MATERIAL WHERE CONSISTENT WITH SAFETY AND SPACE CONSIDERATIONS SHALL BE PLACED ON THE UPHILL SIDE OF TRENCHES; C. TRENCH DEWATERING SYSTEMS (MUST DISCHARGE INTO SEDIMENT TRAPS, SEDIMENT PONDS, OR OTHER ACCEPTABLE MEANS); D. TRACKING AND SPILLING OF MATERIALS ON STREETS DUE TO HAULING; E. DAILY CLEANUP AND STREET MAINTENANCE. 7. ADDITIONAL ESC MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR LARGER DEVELOPMENTS. ALL NEW DEVELOPMENT AND REDEVELOPMENT THAT INCLUDES LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES OF GREATER THAN, OR EQUAL TO, ONE ACRE IN ADDITION TO MEETING THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS SET FORTH ABOVE SHALL COMPLY WITH ESC REQUIREMENTS LISTED BELOW. 8. ESC MINIMUM REQUIREMENT - DELINEATE CLEARING AND EASEMENT LIMITS. IN THE FIELD, MARK CLEARING LIMITS AND/OR ANY EASEMENTS, SETBACKS, SENSITIVE/CRITICAL AREAS AND THE BUFFERS, TREES AND DRAINAGE COURSES. 9. ESC MINIMUM REQUIREMENT - SEDIMENT TRAPPING. PRIOR TO LEAVING THE SITE, STORM WATER RUNOFF SHALL PASS THROUGH A SEDIMENT POND OR SEDIMENT TRAP, OR OTHER APPROPRIATE BMPS. SEDIMENT PONDS AND TRAPS, PERIMETER DIKES, SEDIMENT BARRIERS, AND OTHER BMPS INTENDED TO TRAP SEDIMENT ON -SITE SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AS A FIRST STEP IN GRADING. THESE BMPS SHALL BE FUNCTIONAL BEFORE LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES TAKE PLACE. EARTHEN STRUCTURES, SUCH AS DAMS, DIKES, AND DIVERSIONS SHALL BE SEEDED AND MULCHED ACCORDING TO AN APPROVED TIMETABLE. 10. ESC MINIMUM REQUIREMENT - CUT AND FILL SLOPES. CUT AND FILL SLOPES SHALL BE DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTED IN A MANNER THAT WILL MINIMIZE EROSION. IN ADDITION, SLOPES SHALL BE STABILIZED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ESC REQUIREMENT NO. 2. 11. ESC MINIMUM REQUIREMENT - CONTROLLING OFF -SITE EROSION. PROPERTIES AND WATER WAYS DOWNSTREAM FROM DEVELOPMENT SITES SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM EROSION DUE TO INCREASES IN THE VOLUME, VELOCITY, AND PEAK FLOW RATE OF STORM WATER RUNOFF FROM THE PROJECT SITE. 12. ESC MINIMUM REQUIREMENT - STABILIZATION OF TEMPORARY CONVEYANCE CHANNELS AND OUTLETS. ALL TEMPORARY ON -SITE CONVEYANCE CHANNELS SHALL BE DESIGNED, CONSTRUCTED AND STABILIZED TO PREVENT EROSION FROM THE EXPECTED VELOCITY OF FLOW FROM A TWO-YEAR, 24-HOUR FREQUENCY STORM FOR THE DEVELOPED CONDITION. STABILIZATION ADEQUATE TO PREVENT EROSION OF OUTLETS, ADJACENT STREAM BANKS, SLOPES AND DOWNSTREAM REACHES SHALL BE PROVIDED AT THE OUTLETS OF ALL CONVEYANCE SYSTEMS. 13. ESC MINIMUM REQUIREMENT - STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION. ALL STORM DRAIN INLETS MADE OPERABLE DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE PROTECTED SO THAT STORM WATER RUNOFF SHALL NOT ENTER THE CONVEYANCE SYSTEM WITHOUT FIRST BEING FILTERED OR OTHERWISE TREATED TO REMOVE SEDIMENT. 14. ESC REQUIREMENT - REMOVAL OF TEMPORARY BMPS. ALL TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS SHALL BE REMOVED WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER FINAL SITE STABILIZATION IS ACHIEVED OR AFTER THE TEMPORARY BMPS ARE NO LONGER NEEDED. TRAPPED SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED OR STABILIZED ON SITE. DISTURBED SOIL AREAS RESULTING FROM REMOVAL SHALL BE PERMANENTLY STABILIZED. 15. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL REQUIREMENT - DEWATERING CONSTRUCTION SITES. DEWATERING SYSTEMS SHALL DISCHARGE INTO A SEDIMENT TRAP OR SEDIMENT POND. 16. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL REQUIREMENT - CONTROL OF POLLUTANTS OTHER THAN SEDIMENT ON CONSTRUCTION SITES. ALL POLLUTANTS OTHER THAN SEDIMENT THAT OCCUR ON SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE HANDLED AND DISPOSED OF IN A MANNER THAT DOES NOT CAUSE CONTAMINATION OF STORM WATER. 17. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL REQUIREMENT - FINANCIAL LIABILITY. PERFORMANCE BONDING, OR OTHER APPROPRIATE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS, SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR ALL PROJECTS TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH THE APPROVED EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN. [ORD. 3013 § 1, 1995]. CITY OF EDMONDS APPROVED FOR CONSTR UCTION FOR: . PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR DATE E (a INSIGHT ENOM nH� &WWS CO. P.O. BOX - 1478 EVERETT, WA 98206 (425) 303-9363 (425) 303-9362 FAX INFO@ INS IGHTENGINEERING.NET SITE ADDRESS: 9516 EDMONDS WAY EDMONDS, WA 98020 DESCRIPTION I INITIALS I DATE I TAX ACCOUNT NO.'S: 27033600100900 1011412024 PLN2023-0029 NE 114, SEC. 36, TWP. 27N. RGE. 3 E., W.M. CASCARA DWG FILENAME DESIGNED BY: DATE: SCALE: JOB NO.: 221226-FINAL.DWG I DNK 0312812024 1 "--10' 1 22-1226 SHEET GRADING AND TESL C2.2 NOTEs & DETAILAttach a Packet Pg. 135 PI n17n,?q_nn7a \ \ PROPOSED YARDS DRAIN (TYP.) \ J. \a d\l °! STA:10+4 RIM. 0.� �i .Q a RIM:G 338.7.75 � PROPOSED IE 336.76 (12" OUT S) Q " IE 336.55 (6" IN, NE) ° DRAIN -o_ Q ►0 IE=335.77 (12" IN, SE) Q Q � . s_ Q / 5' x 5' PATIO (TYP.) \ a d q Q q d4Q d 4 PV( FOOT.�NG ORAII Q\ CB13, CB W/ SOLID LOCKING LID STA:10+43.43, 79.05' L RIM:339.25 IE. 335.50 (12" IN, SE) IE. 335.50 (12" OUT, W) IE 396 (4" IN) 0 rUU LAJLMLNI _(A.F.. #7603220241) 0' 6LF 12" PVC @ 0.007 FF=340.00 Q ° Q PIS GP'` FFC�DGARAGE / 335.26 Q \ OOR=339 50 / d NE 114, SEC. 36, TWP. 27N. RGE. 3 E., W.M. KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON 9510 EDMONDS WAY EDMONDS, WA 98020 CB#4, OVERFLOW CB W/ SOLID LOCKING LID STA:10+53.96, 80.81 ' L RIM.339.50 1 IE 335.25 (12" IN, SW) IE. 335.75 (12" OUT, NW) C3.0 d . ° . °. ROOF DRAIN TYP.) G��G / / / • D� 1� ° . ° 4 / STORMTANK WITH j' Q D u ° INFILTRATION 2 (60' x 15' x 1.5) C3.3 4 a / ° - A � 1 d LU .. .4 EASEMENT AGREEMENT (A.F. #211071,� Q d a dd Q a 20' W.N.G. EASEMENT (A.F. #9107250427� \ 25LF 1?." Sr) @5„34gd E: 335.25 \ / a � a Q FF@GARAGE DOOR=339.50 CB#1, STORMFILTE Q / STA:10+81.78, 0.00' ° 4" RIM.•338.90 \ d d a FOOTIN ,DRAIN / FF=339.50 D . �/ / d /. IE 336.60 (12 IN, N) ° � /a / \ iQ \ IE. 336.60 (12" IN, S) �} Q \ \ IE 336.60 (12" OUT, E) 2 8' SEWER � SEMEN , C3.2 (A.F. 11982543 TEMP. GRADING)\ �`/ 3 EASEMENT \ c0_ SHORT PLA `D \ / i / / 00001 (A.F. #2003011 4 0 J 9530 EDMONDS WAY EDMONDS, WA 98020 // r/ TEMP. CONSTRUCTION 9520 EDMONDS WAY EASEMENT / EDMONDS, WA 98020 CB#5, STA:11 +53.65, 23.80' R \ RIM.•340.20 IE. 337.85 (12" OUT, N) FRO / \ SYS Know what's below. �\ Call before you dig. UTILITY CONFLICT NOTE. CAUTION.• THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING THE LOCATION, \ \ DIMENSION, AND DEPTH OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHETHER SHOWN ON THESE } PLANS OR NOT, BY POTHOLING THE UTILITIES AND SURVEYING THE HORIZONTAL ` o AND VERTICAL LOCATION PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THIS AND THEN SHALL INCLUDE CALLING UTILITY LOCATE @ 1-800-424-5555 POTHOLING ALL OF THE EXISTING UTILITIES AT LOCATIONS OF NEW UTILITY CROSSINGS TO PHYSICALLY VERIFY WHETHER OR NOT CONFLICTS EXIST. LOCATIONS OF SAID UTILITIES AS \ 12+03 SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ARE BASED UPON THE UNVERIFIED PUBLIC INFORMATION AND ARE SUBJECT TO VARIATION. IF CONFLICTS SHOULD OCCUR, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSULT WITH INSIGHT ENGINEERING COMPANY TO RESOLVE ALL PROBLEMS PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH CONSTRUCTION. 1 TYPE 10 VERFL 0 W CB C3.0 N. T.S. SCALE: 1" = 10' 10 5 0 10 20 PROJECT SITE CATEGORY.- CATEGORY 2 DISCHARGE LOCATION: EDMONDS WAY BASIN LEGEND ►p EXISTING MONUMENT (AS SHOWN) E>0a SECTION 1/4 CORNER NOT FOUND CONSTRUCTION NOTES: + SECTION CORNER NOT FOUND 1. APPLICANT SHALL REPAIR/REPLACE ALL DAMAGE TO UTILITIES OR FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS IN CITY FOUND REBAR/CAP OR I.P. (IRON PIPE) RIGHT-OF-WAY PER CITY STANDARDS THAT IS CAUSED OR OCCURS DURING THE PERMITTED PROJECT. CALCULATED 2. ANY CURB, GUTTER OR SIDEWALK CURRENTLY DAMAGED OR - PLAT DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE REPLACE PER ENGINEERING INSPECTION. (NI) MEASURED 3. A MINIMUM OF 3' SEPARATION IS REQUIRED BETWEEN THE TBR TO BE REMOVED DRY UTILITIES (POWER, GAS, PHONE, CABLE, ETC.) AND SEWER, WATER AND STORM AND 5' FROM ANY CITY MAIN R.D.W. RIGHT-OF-WAY LINES. P.O.B. POINT OF BEGINNING 5, ALL FINAL RESTORATION SHALL BE COMPLETED BY THE C� CENTERLINE CONTRACTOR NOT THE CITY OF EDMONDS. CLF CHAIN LINK FENCE 6. ALL UTILITIES TO BE PLACED UNDERGROUND. WDF WOOD FENCE 7. A MINIMUM OF 10' HORIZONTAL AND 1.5' VERTICAL (AT W S. WATER SURFACE CROSSINGS) IS REQUIRED BETWEEN SEWER AND WATER EOP EDGE OF PAVEMENT LINES. BOW BACK OF WALK 8. A MINIMUM OF 5' HORIZONTAL AND 1.0' VERTICAL (AT 0 STORM DRAIN CATCH BASIN (CB) CROSSINGS) SEPARATION IS REQUIRED BETWEEN WATER AND CB STORM LINES. 0 SD STORM DRAIN MANHOLE (SDMH) 9. A MINIMUM OF 2' OF COVER IS REQUIRED FOR ALL PIPES O SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE (SSMH) LOCATED UNDER A DRIVABLE SURFACE AND 1' OF COVER SS IS REQUIRED FOR LANDSCAPE AREAS. NCO SANITARY SEWER CLEAN OUT (CO) 10. HOMES SHALL BE SPRINKLERED. -0-P POWER POLE 11. THE PAINTED FOGLINE AND CENTERLINE WILL BE STRIPED, AS REQUIRED, PRIOR TO PROJECT COMPLETION.P GUY POLE ❑ WM WATER METER WATER VALVE Wv FMB MAILBOX E-- UTILITY POLE ANCHOR FIRE HYDRANT (2 NOZZLE) TYPE I NGPA SIGN - - - - - - - - - PROPOSED WATER PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER PROPOSED STORM DRAINAGE PROPERTY LINE X X EXISTING FENCE LINE // // EDGE OF PAVEMENT - - XXX EXISTING CONTOURS PROPOSED CONTOURS PRE-EXISTING DRAINAGE PATTERN G GAS LINE DU DRY UTILITIES (POWER, PHONE, AND CABLE) TYPE OFAREA SQUAREFOOTAGE STORMWATER FACILITY LAWN AND LANDSCAPE 2,958 SF BMP T5.13 ROOFS 3,329 SF INFILTRATION TRENCH DRIVEWAY 1,932 SF INFILTRATION TRENCH FRONTAGE SIDEWALK 771 SF BYPASS OFFSITE SIDEWALK 262 SF BYPASS ONSITE WALKWAY 1,404 SF INFILTRATION TRENCH ONSITE ROAD Z337 SF INFILTRATION TRENCH 256 SF BYPASS OFFSITE ROAD 3,205 SF INFILTRATION TRENCH LINE TYPE AREA (SQUARE FEET) 1 NON -REGULATED 0 EXEMPT 2 REPLACED 0 3 NEW (POST 1977) + 4 TOTAL REGULATED IMPERVIOUS AREA - MITIGATION REQUIRED IF IN EXCESS OF 2000 SF 5 TOTAL AREA MITIGATED BY EXISTING STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM(S) - 6 REGULATED AREA NOT YET MITIGATED = 7 AREA PROPOSED TO BE MITIGATED BY LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT TECHNIQUES = 8 AREA PROPOSED TO BE MITIGATED THROUGH CONVENTIONAL SWM TECHNIQUES - REGULATED 13,461 SF 13,461 SF 0 SF 990 SF 12,471 SF 0 SF REV. NO. DESCRIPTION 1011412024 N W E+ , 3 VICINITYMAP S SCALE. 1 `2000' do: EQUIPMENT AND PROCEDURE BASIS OF BEARING: SHORT PLAT (A.F. #200301175007) BM SNO. CO. PT. J23 MONUMENT IN CASE - 92ND AVE. W. ELEV. = 367.97 DATUM: NAVD 88 N.A.V.D 88-3.64'=NGVD '29 (MSL) ENGINEER/CONTACT SURVEYOR INSIGHT ENGINEERING COMPANY WEST ALLIANCE P.O. BOX 1478 13614 ASH WAY EVERETT WA 98206 EVERETT WA 98204 CONTACT: BRIAN R. KALAB, P.E. (509) 630-078J (425) 303-9363 EMAIL: MATRIXSURVEYOR©LIVE.COM OWNER /APPLICANT JAKE LYON WESTERLY, LLC 320 DAYTON ST, STE 101 EDMONDS, WA 98020 JAKE@WESTERLYRE. COM LEGAL DESCRIPTION ALL THAT PORTION OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 27 NORTH, RANGE 3 EAST, W.M., DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SAID NORTH HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER DISTANT NORTH 88° 14' 33" EAST 90.00 FEET FROM THE SOUTHWEST CORNER THEREOF, • THENCE NORTH 02' 54' 05" WEST 274.02 FEET TO THE SOUTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF THE COUNTY ROAD (NOW STATE ROAD NO. 1-W); THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID ROAD MARGIN ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 1450.85 FEET AN ARC DISTANCE OF 12.46 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THIS DESCRIPTION, THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT AN ARC DISTANCE OF 91.53 FEET, • THENCE SOUTH 25° 29' 40" EAST 130 FEET, • THENCE SOUTH 48' 38' 13" 103.96 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF THE LAND CONVEYED TO TILLMAN BURTON DEARING AND WIFE BY DEED FILED FOR RECORD UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 1354369; THENCE ALONG SAID EAST LINE NORTH 25° 29' 40" WEST 103.95 FEET TO A POINT WHICH BEARS SOUTH 02° 54' 05" EAST FROM THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 02' 54' 05" WEST 31.48 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF WASHINGTON UNDER RECORDING NUMBERS 2206152 AND 2206153. SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. CITY OF EDMONDS APPROVED FOR CONSTR UCTION FOR: , PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR DATE 1 NSIGHT E N61 N E ERI NG CO. P.O. BOX - 1478 EVERETT, WA 98206 (425) 303-9363 (425) 303-9362 FAX INFO@ INS IGHTENGINEERING.NET SITE ADDRESS: 9516 EDMONDS WAY EDMONDS, WA 98020 INITIALS I DATE TAX ACCOUNT NO.'S: 270JJ600100900 PLN2023-0029 NE 114, SEC. 36, TWP. 27N. RGE. 3 E., W.M. CASCARA DWG FILENAME DESIGNED BY: DATE: SCALE: JOB NO.: 22122 1 DNK 0312812024 1 "=10' 1 22-1226 ROAD, DRAINAGE SHEET & UTILITY PLAN C3, 0 Attach a Packet Pg. 136 PI n17n7q_nn7a I PI ni7n7q_nn?Q NE 114, SEC. 36, TWP. 27N. RGE. 3 E., W.M. KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON z Q � v 17 DRAIN as "3.2 4 a / ° 4 CB#1, STORMFILTE STA:10+81.78, 0.00' RIAk33R Qn 1. 1U uD C,) a 0 LL C r 6LF 12" PVC @ 0.00% CB#4, OVERFLOW CB W1 SOLID LOCKING LID STA:10+53.96, 80.81 ' L RIM:339.50 IE 335.25 (12" IN, SW) n 1E: 335.75 (12 OUT, NW) \ a / IF: 335.25 ° \ \ � / d 4 / q d d \ j Q ° ° d d Q 6 ROOF DRAIN TYP.) 4 d a ° ° / STORMTANK WITH 2 / ° FVHLTRATION / ° C3.2 41 a \ da ° 4 d d \ d j/ 4 ° / ° 1 \ 4 ° ° \\ Al ° 25LF 12" E. 335.25 ° 4 // SD 5.349° d ° 4" PVC FOOTING DRAIN FINISHED IMPERwiOUS SU�c"�'c (DESIGN BY ENGINEER OF RE SUITABLE COMPACTAIBLE FILL (AS NECESSARY - DESIGN BY ENGINEER Of RECORD) LAYFIELD NUBtARRIER GREEN GEOTEXTI LE (OR EQUAL) SURROUNDING K40DULES AND STONE>,'SOIL INTERFACE )." (19 mmI ANGULAR STON E MIN. COVER PER PIPE MANUFACTU REF IDPTIONAL UNDEDr%0AIN (MAX. A" IA-9 r-mmj aIA. f TO EXTEND A MINIMUM Y4 LENGTH Of THE SYSTEM ENGINEER OF RECORD RESPONSIBLE FOR ENSURING SUBGRADE SOILS MEET BEARING AND SETTLING REQUIREMENTS Know what's below. Call before you dig. UTILITY CONFLICT NOTE. CAUTION.• THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING THE LOCATION, DIMENSION, AND DEPTH OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHETHER SHOWN ON THESE PLANS OR NOT, BY POTHOLING THE UTILITIES AND SURVEYING THE HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL LOCATION PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THIS AND THEN SHALL INCLUDE CALLING UTILITY LOCATE @ 1-800-424-5555 POTHOLING ALL OF THE EXISTING UTILITIES AT LOCATIONS OF NEW UTILITY CROSSINGS TO PHYSICALLY VERIFY WHETHER OR NOT CONFLICTS EXIST. LOCATIONS OF SAID UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ARE BASED UPON THE UNVERIFIED PUBLIC INFORMATION AND ARE SUBJECT TO VARIATION. IF CONFLICTS SHOULD OCCUR, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSULT WITH INSIGHT ENGINEERING COMPANY TO RESOLVE ALL PROBLEMS PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH CONSTRUCTION. STORMTANK`' MODULES 2 STORMTANK CROSS SECTION C3.2 NOT TO SCALE VEGETATED AREA TO BE DESIGNED WITH ADEQUATE COMPACTED FILL FOR DESIGNED LOAD RATING I;DESIGN BY ENGINEER OF RECORD I f EL:339.50 MIN_ 2-0- (610 mm) EL:336.25 (100-YR) MAK 11•-ir (3.35 m) VARIES MIN- V-0` 105 rr-n I EL:334.75 (100-YR) t DEPTH SPECIFIED BY ENGINEER OF RECORD [6' (1 2mm) MIN) MIN. V-U' (3105 mm) SCALE: 1" = 10' 0 5 10 rna.�J►a►��xs�r�.7 ACCESS COVER CONCRETE COLLAR AND REBAR TO MEET HS20 IF APPLICABLE BY - • ` - tea= `� _• �• CONTRACTOR i I I ► A 0.A -�� a o I �-�- 9 t 4 I z VANED INLET GRATE (SOLID COVER OPTIONAL) ram• ram• INSIDE RIM INSIDE RIM PLAN VIEW OPTIONAL SLOPED LID m Ja J- -t_a! 1- 7 o STORMFILTER I CARTRIDGE FILTRATION BAY INLET ; PERMANENT 1 tit �. POOL ELEVATION INLET STUB !b (OPTIONAL) CARTRIDGE SUPPORT `f FLOW KIT CLEANOUT CATCHBASIN FOOT B ACCESS PLUG (TYP. OF 4) ON WEIR WALL SECTION A -A Te Poonn.vner WrrOe"enl '`;l Storm Filter" -V STORMFILTER STEEL CATCHBASIN DESIGN NOTES STORMFILTER TREATMENT CAPACITY IS A FUNCTION OF THE CARTRIDGE SELECTION AND THE NUMBER OF CARTRIDGES. 1 CARTRIDGE CATCHBASIN HAS A MAXIMUM OF ONE CARTRIDGE. SYSTEM IS SHOWN WITH A 27' CARTRIDGE, AND IS ALSO AVAILABLE WITH AN 18" CARTRIDGE. STORMFILTER CATCHBASIN CONFIGURATIONS ARE AVAILABLE WITH A DRY INLET BAY FOR VECTOR CONTROL. PEAK HYDRAULIC CAPACITY PER TABLE BELOW. IF THE SITE CONDITIONS EXCEED PEAK HYDRAULIC CAPACITY, AN UPSTREAM BYPASS STRUCTURE IS REQUIRED. CARTRIDGE SELECTION CARTRIDGE HEIGHT 2F Ir 18" DEEP 3.T RECOMMENDED HYDRAULIC DROP (H) 3.05• 2.7 SPEGFIC FLOW RATE (gpm/90 2 gpm/st 1.67' gpm/sf 1 gpm/sf 2 gpm/sf 1.67• gpm/sf 1 gpm/sf 2 gpWsf 1.67' gpm/sf 1 gpm/sf CARTRIDGE FLOW RATE (gpm) 22.5 1 18.79 11.25 15 12.53 1 7.5 15 1 12.53 7.5 PEAK HYDRAULIC CAPACITY 10 1.0 1 8 INLET PERMANENT POOL LEVEL (A) 11-0' 11 r Z-0- OVERALL STRUCTURE HEIGHT (B) 4'-9" 3'-9' 4'-9- ' 1.67 gpm/sf SPECIFIC FLOW RATE IS APPROVED WITH PHOSPHOSORBFO (PSORB) MEDIA ONLY GENERAL NOTES 1. CONTECH TO PROVIDE ALL MATERIALS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 2. FOR SITE SPECIFIC DRAWINGS WITH DETAILED STORMFILTER CATCHBASIN STRUCTURE DIMENSIONS AND WEIGHTS, PLEASE CONTACT YOUR CONTECH ENGINEERED SOLUTIONS LLC REPRESENTATIVE www.00nte&ES.com 3. STORMFILTER CATCHBASIN WATER QUALITY STRUCTURE SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL DESIGN DATA AND INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DRAWING. 4. INLET SHOULD NOT BE LOWER THAN OUTLET. INLET (IF APPLICABLE) AND OUTLET PIPING TO BE SPECIFIED BY ENGINEER AND PROVIDED BY CONTRACTOR. 5. MANUFACTURER TO APPLY A SURFACE BEAD WELD IN THE SWIPE OF THE LETTER' r ABOVE THE OUTLET PIPE STUB ON THE EXTERIOR SURFACE OF THE STEEL SFCB. 6. STORMFILTER CATCHBASIN EQUIPPED WITH 4 INCH (APPROXIMATE) LONG STUBS FOR INLET OF APPLICABLE) AND OUTLET PIPING. STANDARD OUTLET STUB IS 8 INCHES IN DIAMETER. MAXIMUM OUTLET STUB IS 15 INCHES IN DIAMETER. CONNECTION TO COLLECTION PIPING CAN BE MADE USING FLEXIBLE COUPLING BY CONTRACTOR. 7. STEEL STRUCTURE TO BE MANUFACTURED OF 1/4 INCH STEEL PLATE CASTINGS SHALL MEET AASHTO M306 LOAD RATING. TO MEET HS20 LOAD RATING ON STRUCTURE, A CONCRETE COLLAR IS REQUIRED. WHEN REQUIRED, CONCRETE COLLAR WITH N4 REINFORCING BARS TO BE PROVIDED BY CONTRACTOR. S. FILTER CARTRIDGES SHALL BE MEDIA -FILLED, PASSIVE, SIPHON ACTUATED.. RADIAL FLOW, AND SELF CLEANING. RADIAL MEDIA DEPTH SHALL BE 7-INCHES. FILTER MEDIA CONTACT TIME SHALL BE AT LEAST 38 SECONDS. 9. SPECIFIC FLOW RATE IS EQUAL TO THE FILTER TREATMENT CAPACITY (gpm) DIVIDED BY THE FILTER CONTACT SURFACE AREA (sq ft). INSTALLATION NOTES A. ANY SUB -BASE, BACKFILL DEPTH, AND/OR ANTI -FLOTATION PROVISIONS ARE SITE -SPECIFIC DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS AND SHALL BE SPECIFIED BY ENGINEER OF RECORD. S. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE EQUIPMENT WITH SUFFICIENT LIFTING AND REACH CAPACITY TO LIFT AND SET THE CATCHBASIN (LIFTING CLUTCHES PROVIDED). C. CONTRACTOR TO TAKE APPROPRIATE MEASURES TO PROTECT CARTRIDGES FROM CONSTRUCTION -RELATED EROSION RUNOFF FLOATABLES BAFFLE PERMANENT LIFTING EYE POOL ELEVATION (TYP. OF 4) FINISHED GRADE � _ - ---- TI III o v o >d J WEIR WALL = FILTRATION BAY 5' INLET _ 5" FLOW INLET STUB OUTLET STUB (OPTIONAL) OUTLET PIPE F FROM FLOWKIT 2-4- 1 CATCHBASIN FOOT INSIDE (TYP. OF 4) r-0'z OUTSIDE SECTION B-B C% NTECHe ENGINEERED SOLUTIONS LLC www.contechES.com 9025 Centre Pointe Dr., Sude 400. West Chester, OH 45069 800-528-3999 513-845.7000 5134K&79M FAX i 1 STORMFILTER C3.Z NOT TO SCALE REV. NO. DESCRIPTION 1011412024 1-CARTRIDGE CATCHBASIN STORMFILTER DATA STRUCTURE ID CB 1 WATER QUALITY FLOW RATE cfs 0.0286 PEAK FLOW RATE (<I ds) 0.174 RETURN PERIOD OF PEAK FLOW 100 CARTRIDGE HEIGHT (27,18". Ur DEEPS 18" CARTRIDGE FLOW RATE (gpm) 12.53 MEDIA TYPE ERLITE ZPG, PSORB ZPG RIM ELEVATION 338.90 PIPE DATA: I.E. DIAMETER INLET STUB 336.60 12" OUTLET STUB 336.60 12" CONFIGURATION OUTLET OUTLET INLET 1. j L,INLET INLET INLET SLOPED LID NO SOLID COVER YESO NOTES/SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS: 1 CARTRIDGE CATCHBASIN STORMFILTER STANDARD DETAIL CITY OF EDMONDS APPROVED FOR CONSTR UCTION FOR: , PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR DATE 0 AISIQHU EHQC DH1 kikiilNO CO. P.O. BOX - 1478 EVERETT, WA 98206 (425) 303-9363 (425) 303-9362 FAX INFO@ INSIGHTENGINEERING.NET SITE ADDRESS: 9516 EDMONDS WAY EDMONDS, WA 98020 INITIALS I DATE TAX ACCOUNT NO.'S: 27033600100900 PLN2023-0029 NE 114, SEC. 36, TWP, 27N, RGE. 3 E., W.M. CASCARA DWG FILENAME DESIGNED BY: DATE: I SCALE: JOB NO.: 221226-FINAL.DWG I DNK 0312812024 1 "=10' 22-1226 SHEET DRAINAGE DETAILS C3.2 Attach ie Packet Pg. 138 Pi N7n,?q_nn7a NE 114, SEC. 36, TWP. 27N. RGE. 3 E., W.M. KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON Pages: Cover Page Module Layout TYP. Construction Details TYP. Pipe Penetration Details "1'YP. Debris Row Details Supplementary Notes Supplementary Notes L I� 5'-0' (911 T- TOP BRENTWOOD STORMTANK MODULE LAYOUT DRAWINGS 9516 EDMONDS WAY 01 OF 07 02 OF 07 03 OF 07 04 OF 07 05 OF 07 06 OF 07 07 OF 07 TIaRNAIAN[y TF°BIXa wADrr IOMaxA1 RANNI ITOGNTImm) (-T) owl WEIGHTINI) srT° !f•ITTa..mm) 1fTap� SJ n.00A 'Is.11e.LuIII 1 36" (914 mm) MODULE DETAIL S-0 (CASCARA) Edmonds, wa COLt^M PER MOOl1LE -.( V-6" (457 mm) 7I a ;aD,au l ! ; 9°&0D 11 1 �) 0 4 'GD°GDJGDadD�I Sn>°aaO.rnO: aaaA Tr �arvr,r �a-p .LTG OPEN TO MOnUI r3 AIEG11 CONCRETE CATCH BASIN (BY OTHERS) z 36" (914 mm) SIDE PANEL DETAIL S-0 CROTION STORWANOMODU.ES MAXIMUM PIPE DIAMETERS a1OW� NONPUL ME DIMIETEA Sal 6FM NRaf Br-!1 saMS Br-m 2rom BF3T Br-M 2r Mn amR FINISHED IMPERVIOUS SURFACE FINISHED SURFACE SURFACE GRATE (DESIGN BY ENGINEER OF RECORD) SUITABLE COMPACTABLE FILL (AS NECESSARY - DEBIGN BY ENGINEER OF RECORD) RISER PIPE CONCRETE RING LAYFIELD NuBARRUER GREEN (BY OTHERS) (DESIGNED BY OTHERS) GEOTEXTILE (OR EQl1AL) SURROUNDING MODULES AND STONE/SOIL INTERFACE FLEXIBLE COUPLING BRENTWOOD OBSERVATION ANGULAR STONE PORT WITH LONG END INTO MODULE rr1 SINGLE STACK s-0 OBSERVATION PORT DETAIL REFER TO STORMTANK INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS ROUND ORIFICE MULTI STAGE ORIFICE BOX ORIFICE ORIFICE CONFIGURATIONS (BY OTHERS) SIDE PANELS ARE NOT REQUITED ON MODULES FS DIRECTLY AEUTTI IG THE CATCH BASIN SECTION A -A 3 TYP. CATCH BASIN ABUTMENT DETAIL -0 (IF APPLICABLE) MIN. COVER PER PIPE MANUFACTURER 'lam•- '' OPTIONAL UNDERDRAIN (MAX 4' (101.6 mm) DIA) TO EXTEND A MINIMUM 1; LENGTH OF THE SYSTEM STORMTANK* ENGINEER OF RECORD MODULES RESPONSIBLE FOR ENSURING SUBGRADE SOILS MEET BEARING AND SETTLING REQUIREMENTS VEGETATED AREA TO BE DESIGNED WITH ADEQUATE COMPACTED FILL FOR DESIGNED LOAD RATING (DESIGN BY ENGINEER OF RECORD) 6YIdItlJbdll�lYdllldll - 610 mm) (610 mm) TYPICAL SINGLE STACKED SYSTEM s-0 BASIC CROSS-SECTION F MIN. 1•-0° (3D5 mm) I MAX. 11%0" (3.35 m) MIN. 1'-0" (305 mm) `'� r�// 1901 Raymond Ave. S.W. UV ■ELD Renton, WA 99057. \� Ph:(425)-254-1075 scatllc(d!lay ficldgn)up.aTm SINGLE STACK MODULE SYSTEM Total Storage Volume 1287.20 11' Module Storage Volume 1287.20 f(' Stone Storage Volume 0 n' System Footprint 1054 fie Estimated Gcotcxtilc Fabric 569 yd2 Estimated Stone Volume 67.11 yd' Fxcavation Required 156.15 yd' Minimum Fxcavation Depth 4.00 11 Stone Type" Clear Stone Stone Void Space 40% Module Type 25 Series ST-18 9516 Edmonds Way Edmonds, WA REV Record of Changes Date By' � Preliminary Drawing 230(,'12023 AK A I TankRc-Size 07OCT2024 6V1 Ayer V aHba- 0112023-7612 k%p N- Cover Page n- by AK Mlkcd Bv. 1F s,:a,. N I'S paw 230(' 12023 THIS ► AYOUT DRAWING WAS PREPARED TO SUPPORT TFiF FNGTNTF.R OF RECORD FOR IIIE PROPOSED SYSTEM. Ft, IS'nIL RESPONS113IL11'Y OF TILL I.NOINLIA OP RECORD *1'0 KL''VILW 'I Ill. IM'ORMAIION AND ENSURE II IA I' THE LAYOL-r AND DESIGN IS IN FILL COMPLIANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE. LAWS AND REGI.I.ATIONS AND TIIAT "IF STORMTANK SYSTEM HAS BEEN DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCE WITH BRENTW'OOD-S REQUIREMENTS. I..AYFIFI.D 1)01'%NOI RI:VII:W OR APPROVE PLANS, SIRING OR IN NIGNS. J}lccl: 01 OF 07 ANSI B Size Page (Horizontaq 1901 Raymond Ave. S.W. UGCLD Re-nh:(425)- 54-1075 scallk(dl IayficldgouP.com SINGLE STACK MODULE SYSTEM Total Storage Volume 1297,20 ft Module Storage Volume 1287.20 ft' Stone Storage Volume 0 n' System Footprint 1054 if Estimated Gcotcxtilc Fabric 569 yd) Estimated Stone Volume 67.11 yd' Excavation Required 156.15 yd' Minimum Excavation Depth 4.00 ft Stone Type 4" Clear Stone Stone Void Space 40°/b Module Type 25 Series ST-18 9516 Edmonds Way Edmonds, WA REV Record of Changes Date By � Preliminary Drawing 230C E2023 AK A Tank RE -Se 07(X:'12024 GM IYgoc1 Numbs OP2023-7612 DEPTH SPECIFIED BY ENGINEER OF RECORD Page Name_ TYP- Construction Details [6' (152mm) MINI n- hv- AK cbakm BY, IF %-k NIS One: 230CI'2023 THIS LAYOUT DRAWING WAS PREPARED TO SUPPORT THE ENGINEER OF RECORD FOR THE PROPOSED SYSTEM. IT IS EIIE RFSPONSMTLITY OF TIFF. ENGINEER OF RECORD TO REVIEW ]HE INFORMA170N AND ENSURE THAt I1111 LAYOI:I- AND DI'.SION IS IN FULL COMPI.IANCIi WI I'll Al.l. APPLICABI I IAWS AND REGULATIONS AND THAT THE. STORMTANK SYSTEM HAS BFFN DLSICNED IN .ACCORDANCL WI BRLN I WOOD'S REQUIREMENTS. I.AYI:11:1 1) 1)01.S NO RI NIEW OR APPROVIi I'1 .ANS, SIRING OR DLSIONS_ 1h- 03 OF 07 ANSI B Size Page (Horizontal) Material Quantity (ST-18) ST-18 200 Platens 400 18" Columns 1600 18" Side Panels 131 10" Observation Port 5 6" Saddle Port (By Others) 1 Elevations Leveling Stone Bottom 334.25 Module Bottom 334.75 Module Invert 334.90 Top of Module 336.25 Top of Stone Back fill 337.25 Minimum Finished Grade 338.25 Maximum Finished Grade 345.75 Contractor to confirm that quantities shipped to site match those listed above. Please report any discrepancy or damage to LayGeld immediately. 12" INLET AND STORMTANK SADDLE PORT 6" DIA (SEE DETAIL 1/S-05) 1 NOTES NOTES: -0 a. All dimensions arc measured in feet unless noted otherwise. b- Reference Brentwood Industries standard drawings and notes for detailed information. C. Reference current Brcntw000d Module installation instructions for proper installation practices_ httpsj/mo mwak:r.brmtwoWindustriLs.urm/rmourccsi d. Fnginecr of record to confirm confon-nancc to manufacturer's allowable proximity to other structures and slopes. C. All inlet and pipe locations and designs by others. f. The sub -grade and side backfill needs to be compacted to 95%, unless noted otherwise. g. During and after installation, the Brentwood Module area should be clearly marked and roped off to prevent unauthorized construction and equipment trafficking over the modules. h- Top of Ground water is to be maintained 610 Turn (2 ft) below the module to prevent buoyancy, unless otherwise noted by engineer. i. The quantities related to stone and gcosynthctics are estimated values as the roll size, ovcrlaps, waste, Oct. may vary. j. Materials must be stored in a manner to prevent prolonged exposure to UV light. k- Materials shall not be handled in temperatures lower than 4-4 "C to prevent damage. I. Storm tank system is not considered complete until all backfill is installed to the minimum depth shown on Detail 5 Typical System Cross -Section. The installer MUST insure that the project site remains dry and free of water (both surface and groundwater) until the installation is complete, including the backfill as noted, to avoid damage to the tank system due to buoyancy. 6" INLET (SEE DETAIL. 1/S-05) STORMTANK OBSERVATION PORT 10' DIA (SEE DETAIL 1/S-04 & 41S-03) 6' INLET (SEE DETAIL-/ 1/S-05) STEP 1: STEP 2: STEP 3: - YAP' (V14 Turn) t0. PILE / (S11N7 I U BY OII N NS) 1 OBSERVATION E _ • PORN ALIGNMENT .. III = HOLES (2 RACES) 1 %IACXIW' P1N j (2 PLACES) E E - SEE TABLE A FOR TGP PlV17EN lv OPI NL:G SILL 1' - OWN 1 ORSTRVATION PORT TInEA OBSER✓AiIONf ORf DIMEHJM1 CIRCULAR RECESSES t2 o EHwE _ �cnss RACIST e•n, mm, rmemm� �nA e•roT m� n• Irl mmi N•IT29 �.. . AY(XJ I S C U I OPENING IN I U I HE C EN I I,N CX I FL ION' -LATEN FOR BRENTNOCO OBSERVATION PORT TYP. OBSERVATION PORT OBSERVATION PORT s-o INSTALLATION DETAIL STEP 1: STEP 2: STEP 3: t OC ATG AND MARK OPENING REMOVE SIDE PANELS FROM MODULES REINSTALL SIDE PANELS AND CUT OPENING I_ ti SIDE PANEL OPENING FOR PIPE NSIN IAIION Wl� (RACE OUTLINE OF SIDE PANELS AFTERp MPI 11 10111 N MONN C3 INSTALLED 2 SMALL DIAMETER (14" [356 mm] AND SMALLER) s-� PIPE CONNECTION DETAIL STEP t STEP 2: STEP 3: -JCATE AND MARK OPENING REMOVE SIDE PANELS FROM MODULES AND REINSTALL SIDE PANELS CUT OPENING WE PIMB �Tfi'(Ht4fle Ie• pea n,nq � �I S I. U I � I J PARED •' OPENING FOR PPE TRACE OUTLINE OF INSTALLATION vim 1)1)Iu 4 INSTALLED N IISIX PAN IS It 141 MOVN ti LARGE DIAMETER (15" [381 mm] AND GREATER) \tOy PIPE CONNECTION DETAIL TORMTANK CLEAR STONE MODULE ST18 (SEE DETAIL 11S-03) .50 %--STORMTANK OBSERVATION PORT 10" DIA (SEE DETAIL 1/S-04 & 4/S-03) STORMTANK DEBRIS ROW (SEE DETAIL 1/S-05) 12" OUTLET (SEE DETAIL 1/S-05) 1.00 2 E LAYOUT S-O2 SOLE NTS STEP 4: STEP 5 NOWWOVEN GEOTEXTILE FABRIC (LAYFIELD LPS OR APPROVED EQUAL) 4 ' o0Q _ FLANGE PLATE MART A CUT FLAME RATE FLUSH WITH NaTAi I aroTrxTs r' MODULI: SIDE'W1IEN MODULE IS ON THE WRAP SPECIFIED OEOTEXTLE FABRIC AROUND PERIMETER OF THE SYSTEM.' ENTIRE NSTALLATiOFI OF STORMTANK MODULES OUT ' I PATTERN NIO GEOTEXTILE FABRIC AT OBSERVATION PORT AM PEEL EDGES OUT. STEP 4: INSTALL PIPE (SLIP FIT) EN, tA• (36.66 mm) MAX TOP PLATEN sI I PAN I INLET PPE (BY OTHERS) IxxtILN DETAIL STEP 4: INSTALL PIPE (SUP FIT) STEP 6: i I � SEAL FABRIC TO OBSERVATON PORT WITH SS BANDING, WATER RESISTANT TAPE OR NYLON ZIP -TIE STEP 5: WRAP AND SECURE GEOTEXTILE 1 NONWOVEN OEOTEXTILE FABRIC (IAYFELD N16ARNER (TEEN GEOTEXTILE OR APPROVED EOIYLL) AROUND WHOLE TANK SEAL FABRIC TO INLET PIPE WITH SS BANDNG. WATER RESISTANT TAPE OR NYLON LP TIE (BY OTHERS) 01V DIN RS) STEP 5: WRAP AND SECURE GEOTEXTILE NONWOVEN GEOTEXTILE FABRIC (LAYFIELD NARRIER GREEN /GEOEEXTLE OR APPROVED EQUAA) AROUND THE YYHOLE TAN( �J SEAL FABRIC TO INLET PIPE WITH M y mm) SS BA► DING. WATER MAX RESISTANT TAPE OR TOP PLATEN ( NYION/W is (BY OTHERS) SIDE PNEL C N.a1Ma1 INLET PPE CRY OTHERS) INLET PPE (BY OTIEAa) /� 1901 Raymond Ave. S.W. (j N� MYRELL RhWA 98057. v Ph:: (42 (425)-254-1U75 sealtle(a laytfieldgroup.com SINGLE STACK MODULE SYSTEM Total Storage Volume 1287.20 11' Module Storage Volume 1287.20 if Stone Storage Volume 0 ft System Footprint 1054 F12 Estimated Geolemile Fabric 569 yd' Estimated Stone Volume 67.11 ydT Excavation Required 156.15 ydT Minimum Excavation Depth 4.00 ft Stone Type 4" Clear Stone Stone Void Space 40% Module Type 25 Series ST-I8 9516 Edmonds Way Edmonds, WA REV Record of Changes Date BY Q Preliminary Thawing 230CT2023 AK Qj Tank Re -Size 07OCT2024 GM +oxa Nambs: OP2023-7612 I.tL�xNHIe: Module Layout Tk-by AK fW. &cdBy 1F S, d, N I'S rkm 230C12021 THIS LAYOLrI DRAWING WAS PREPARED TO SLTPORT THE. F.NGINFTR OF RECORD FOR'l'IB: PROPOSED SYSTEM. 11 IS 1'l1E RESPONSI1311-1 EY OF IIIE I NUINLICR OF RECORD 1'D REVIEW 1111:INFORM.VION AND ENSURE. I11A'I FHE LAYOUT AND DESIGN IS IN FULL COMPLIANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE I.AWS AND RIC(i1)1A170NS AND 1'IIA'I'1111: SI'ORM'IANK SYSI EMI IIAS MAN DFSIGNE.D IN ACCORDANCE WMI BRENTWOODS REQUIREMENTS. LAYFIELD DOES NO'r REVIEW OR APPROVE PLANS, SIZING OR DESIGNS. slim: 02 OF 07 ANSI B Size Page (Horizontal) 1901 Raymond Ave. S.W. "YRELD 1�a25))-2s99057. 10 s -. ttte(Wlayfieldgroup-com SINGLE STACK MODULE SYSTEM Total Storage Volume 1287.20 n' Module Storage Volume 1287.20 ft' Stone Storage Volume 0 It'T System Footprint 1054 ft Estimated Gcotcxtilc Fabric 569 yd2 Estimated Stone Volume 67.11 yd' Fxcavation Required 156.15 yd' Minimum Excavation Depth 4.00 11 Stone Type" Clear Stone Stone Void Space 40% Module Type 25 Series ST-18 9516 Edmonds Way Edmonds, WA REV Record of Changes Dale By QP ehniinary Drawing 230(' 12023 AK QTank Re -Size 070C I2024 6 Aaljecl Number. OP2023-7612 Pane Name: TYP. Pipe Penetration Details I).alvv by: AK L'heeked By JE 9TaM NT3 Ikt: 23(XA2023 1711S l-AYOU I DRAWING WAS PREPARED TO SUPPORT' I'I II: li\GINIU:R OF RECORD FOR THE PROPOSED SYSTF.M. TT IS THE. RF.SPONStRR.TTY OF THE. L•NGINLL•-R Ol REcoRD 1U R1:VtLw niL INEORNiAno.x AND LNSURL niA:f T M TAY(NTr AND DESIGN IS IN FI IT.T. COMPLTANCf•. WrEl l AI.T. APPI ]CARIT.. IAWS AND REGULATIONS AND'IHAT THE. m oRAfrAN-K SYSTEM HAS BFJ-N DES1CKNI:D IN ACCORDANC'L• Wl'lll URLN'1'W'OOCrS RLQUIRLMEN1'S. TAYTTET.D TX)F.S NOT RFVIFW OR APPROVF. PLANS, SIZING OR DESIGNS. TI 04 OF 07 ANSI B Size Page (Horizontal) 1 REV. NO. I DESCRIPTION I INITIALS I DATE 1011412024 N N 3 O s C 3 O F- M t� In M 0 CITY OF EDMONDS APPROVED FOR CONSTR UCTION FOR: PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR DATE 1 NSIGHT E NGI N E ER1 NG CO. P.O. BOX - 1478 EVERETT, WA 98206 (425) 303-9363 (425) 303-9362 FAX INFO@ INS IGHTENGINEERING.NET SITE ADDRESS: 9516 EDMONDS WAY EDMONDS, WA 98020 TAX ACCOUNT NO.'S: 27033600100900 PLN2023-0029 NE 114, SEC. 36, TWP. 27N. RGE. 3 E., W.M. CASCARA DWG FILENAME DESIGNED BY.- DATE: SCALE: JOB NO.: 22122 1 DNK 0312812024 1 "=10' 1 22-1226 SHEET STORMTANK DETAILS C(3.3 Attach e Packet Pi, 139 Pi r\i?n?q_nn?a NE 114, SEC. 36, TWP. 27N. RGE. 3 E., W.M. KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON DEBRIS ROW PERIMETER SIDE PANELS GEOTEXTILE FABRIC SECURED WITH ZIP DO NOT EXTEND THE GEOTE FABRIC UP TO THE TOP OF MO NOTE: GEOTEXTILE HEIGHT BASED Of HYDROGRAPH ELEVATION OF SELECTE STORM OR MINIMUM 12' (305mm), DO NOT EXTENT IT ALL THE WAY TO TOP OF SIDE PANELS AND GEOTEXTILE FABRIC ALONG THE PERIMETER OF DEBRIS ROW INFI UFNT •WYF' C.ONNFCTION (BY O I HF RS) INFLUENT PIPE (BY OTI IERS) RENTWOOD OBSERVATION PORT OF DEBRIS ROW -NUMBER OF OBSERVATION PORTS FROM M MODULE LAYOUT BRENTWO MODULE LAYOUT (REFER TO 2/S-02) DEBRIS ROW -ER TO 21S-02) skYk la{ ( c I FLEXIBLE \ J� SADDLE PORT (BY OTHERS) -- T PIPE OTHERS) FINISHED DEBRIS ROW WITH INLET AND OBSERVATION PORT O I HII 1901 Raymond Ave. S.W. AYREI A Renton, WA 98057 i��. Iili�i/ 1'b:(a2sE2saao7s scattle(a)layf ieldgroup.com SINGLE STACK MODULE SYSTEM 'total Storage Volume 1287.20 ft' Module Storage Volume 1287.20 IV Stone Storage Volume 0 113 System Footprint 1054 ft' Estimated Gcotcxtilc Fabric 569 yd' Estimated Stone Volume 67.11 yd' Excavation Required 156.15 yd' Minimum Excavation DcpLh 4.00 ft Stone Type' Clear Stone Stone Void Space 40% Module Type 25 Senc, S'l -Ix 9516 Edmonds Way Edmonds, WA REV Record ol'Changes Date By QPreliminary Drawing 230CT2023 AK QI ank Rc Siic (112024 GM .;-.5-•S-•S-•S-•S-•S-•$- •t-•S-■S-■i-•i-.;-9 %.g%.g%.g%.g%.g%.g� •%.g%..gl•gI•gI•gI•gI• 11111111. ' II'1I�'��I1IIIN�1�I EcC[�r SIDE PANELS i�� Efk t, \�. t Debris • Details i•g. g. I I I,II11I,I PERIMETER OF DEBRIS //%'i/i\\\\`�///'i/\`//i'/v\//i/o//•i/\��//'i/\\//.i/ i//�� / ii` �\,\\\� a�.0I NOT FXTIcECTEXTILE FA13PJC SECURED al al FABRIC UP TO THIF TOP OF . .+,.•ga:!. �.. g:. g.. g.. so. 60. ga. ga. ga. a'. . .•ir. a :MODULE \\\\\\\\\�\QQ�\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ • •• 1 1• •' I i 1 TYP. DEBRIS ROW CROSS• • TYP. DEBRIS ROW DETAIL SINGLE STACK SYSTEM I / I 6.0 Side Backfill 1. Inspect all geotextlle, ensuring that no voids or damage exists; which will allow sediment into the Stornrl system 2 Adjust the stone/soil interface geotextile along the side of the native soil to ensure the geotextile is taught to the native soil. 3 Once the geotextile is secured, begin to place the Side Backfill. a. a. Material should be a 3/4" (19 mm) angular stone meeting Appendix B - Acceptable Fill Material. b. b. Backfill sides "evenly" around the perimeter without exceeding single 12" (305 mm) lifts. c Place material utilizing an excavator, dozer or conveyor boom d. Utilize a plate vibrator to settle the stone and provide a uniform distribution a. Maximum 12" (305 mm) lifts, compacted with a vibratory plate or walk behind roller to a minimum of 90% Standard Proctor Density. b. The minimum top ooveribackfill to finished grade must not be less then that shown on Detail 5 Typical System Cross Section, and the maximum depth from final grade to the bottom of the lowest module should not exceed that shown on Detail 5 2. Finish to the surface and complete with vegetative cover npervious Area 1 Place fill onto the geotextile a. Maximum 12" (305 mm) lifts, compacted with a vibratory plate or walk behind roller to a minimum of 90% Standard Proctor Density b The minimum top cover/backfill to finished grade must not be less then that shown on Detail 5 Typical System Cross Section, and • Do not apply vehicular load to the modules during exceed that shown on Detail 5. placement of side backfill. All material placement 2 Finish to the surface and complete with asphalt, should occur with equipment located on the native concrete, etc. soil surrounding the system. • If damage occurs to the geotextile fabric or Notes: impermeable liner. repair the material in A vibratory roller may only be utilized after a accordance with the geotextile/liner Manufacturer's minimum 24" (610 mm) of compacted material has recommendations been installed or for the installation of the asphalt wearing course 7.0 Top Backfill (Stone) If damage occurs to the geotextile fabric, repair the material in accordance with the geotextile 1. Begin to place the Top Backfill. Manufacturer's recommendations a. Material should be a 3/4" (19 mm) angular 0 For most recent Installation guidelines visit stone meeting Appendix B - Acceptable Fill http://www.brentwoodmdustnes.comiresources/ Material. 9 0 Inspection and Maintenance b. Place material utilizing an excavator, dozer If the following inspections and maintenance procedures or conveyor boom (Tech Bulletin Stormtank are not followed as specified below then the end -user is Module 25 Series Construction Equipment) responsible for the performance of the modules. These and use a walk -behind plate vibrator to settle Maintenance procedure must be performed after a the stone and provde an even distribution heavy rainfall, flooding or any incident that will vary the DO NOT DRIVE ON THE MODULES WITHOUT A flow of water drastically. MINIMUM 12" (305 mm) COVER Inspection 2. Upon completion of Top Backfilling, wrap the 1. Inspect all observation ports, inflow and outflow system in geotextile fabric and/or liner per connection and the discharge area manufacturer's recommendations. 3. Install metallic tape around the perimeter of the 2. Identify and log any sediment and debris system to mark the area for future utility detection. accumulation, system backup, or discharge rate changes Notes: 3 If there is a sufficient need for a cleanout, contact • If damage occurs to the geotextile fabric or a local cleaning company for assistance. impermeable liner, repair the material in Cleaning accordance with the geotextile/liner Manufacturer's recommendations. 1 If a pretreatment device is installed, follow 8 0 Suitable Compactable Fill manufacturer recommendations. Following Top Backfill placement and geotextlle fabric 2 Using vacuum pump truck, evacuate debris from wrapping; complete the installation as noted below. the inflow and outflow points. Vegetated Area 3. Flush the system with clean water, forcing debris from the system. 1. Place fill onto the geotextile. 4. Repeat steps 2 and 3 until no debris is evident 00T0R TANS( TECH BULLETIN _lrpett Results' StormTank" Module 25 Series Construction Equipment Background To provide clarity on co• s-.ruction equ amen[ that can travel over a Storml Module system during construction, :he below lable has been created. Thi, table is •rot all inclusive and evaluation try the cn•sttAvlo, on a case by case egldpr-wnt may Iw necessary aefona lxrn:eed'ng. cover Wheel Load Maximum T-ked Equipment Wkr Eoads Depth (Vehicles and Equipment) Ole' I.unurn II.unum bark M im"U•n We'ghl Maruisum Urum Vadule {vehicle) IEQulpmen:) Width ;i nc udirg mate ria) Weight 6m. Not Pruitt.] NMPermitted N/A COP Ecuipment Not Permitted (<s pa) Defy 12 in. 6.500lbs. 8.000lbs. N/A LGP Eauipmcnt <10psi (<lop 0I :2 in. 20.0301 bs. 18 in. 11,01XIl s. 14,SWIos. -gin' AOOo lbs. 20.=I bs. 24 in. 40.0001 bs. W.atic Only) Brim. 611,17Mlh,. 'tin. 40,000lbs. :8 in. 50.0001 bs. h10001 bs. 2/ in. 16m ,01XIlbs. 20,0bs. (Inc Airg 24 in. 60.0001bs. Dynamic) 36 in. FAOW 11s :. Vehide rasa tire contact areaof 1.7'x10- 2. Equipment has a Lire contact area of 1120" (duel wheel lr.xks like dump :rucks) 3. Ccver depth s based on angula- material. ut iotion of other materials impacts loco rating R. Dump ng dorm y n,•rr the ,yo- is prol-ibited, rxc ud, ng aspluL- rota i paver ,rift 3. Consideration must be. ve n for rutting into cover material when atiliting:a3Ie 6. Excavat,cn ecuiprnent cannot opeute lexcavate) from ove -the system 7.MI ali,prohibited Innn beingetarlipiledovera,ye lent 8. To, %pecial ty rquipmrnt (material handles, rranrs, i. nits with natrigiI rtr. ) oontart aStom ank Rep. brtore ut is.tion over the system Pa elufl ANSI B Size Page (Horizontal) \\//�� r�� //�� 1901 Raymond Ave S.W. �.l41i-IlIEit1_irllr Ph: (425)-254-1075 Rcnttm,WA9R057. SCAIIIc(b)layFtcklgTt LlP.Cont SINGLE STACK MODULE SYSTEM To(al Storage Voltaic 1287.20 ft' Module Storage Volume 1287.20 11' Stonc Storage Volume 0 113 System Footprint III R' Estimated Gcotcxtilc Fabric 569 yd Estimated Stone Volume 67.11 vd' Excavation Required 156,15 yd' Minimum Excavation Depth 400 ft Slone Type a" Clear Slone Stone Void Space 40'! Module Type 25 Series S 1-1 x 9516 Edmonds Way Edmonds, WA REV Record of Changes Date By QPreliminary Drawing 230C12023 AK Tank Re-S17C 070CT2024 GM Ih ir,iNumLes. OP2023-7612 Page N.- Supplementary Notes txawn by: AK (h krd B,: JF Sate: NTS u tr. 230CT2023 'I1115 LAYOUT DRA WLNG WAS PREPARF.D'I'O SUPPORT' 1'IIE GNGINI LIt OF RIPCORD FORT II IE PROPOSI1) SYSTEM. IT IS VIIF RESPONSIBILITY 01:'111F ,N(;INI''.I:R OI' RECORD 1'0 RI.vII;W lilt: INFORMA1ION AND ICNSORIi'r11AT THE I.AYOIJT AND DESIGN IS IN E7n.I. COMPLIANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE LAWS AND REGULAIIOVS AND THAI THE 9YORMI"ANK SYSTEM HAS BE'k.N DIISICN I•:D IN ACCORDANCP. Wl I I I IiRICN I'WOOD'S RI?QI IIRLMIfKl 9, F.AYFiFLD DOES NOT RF.\'iFW OR APPROVF. PLANS. Si7.FYG OR DESIGNS. 07 OF 07 ANSI B Size Page (Horizontal) General Conditions • Review installation procedures and coordinate the installation with other construction activities, such as grading, excavation, utilities, construction access, erosion control. etc. • Engineered Contract Drawings supersede all provided documentation, as the information furnished in this document is based on a typical installation. • Coordinate the installation with manufacturer's representative/distributor to be on -site to review start up procedures and installation instructions • Components shall be unloaded, handled and stored in an area protected from traffic and in a manner to prevent damage. • Assembled modules may be walked on, but vehicular traffic is prohibited until backfilled per Manufacturer's requirements. Protect the Installation against damage with highly visible construction tape, fencing, or other means until construction is complete. Ensure all construction occurs in accordance with Federal, Provincial and Local Laws, Ordinances, Regulations and Safety Requirements. Extra care and caution should be taken when temperatures are at or below 40" F (4 4' C)- NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION These drawings shall not be used for construction until they have been reviewed for all design aspects (structural, geotechnical, stormwater) and approved by the Engineer of Record for the Project It is the Buyers responsibility to ensure that the design Into which the Product will be used has been approved by the Engineer of Record (not Layfield) with a review that may include, but not be limited to, Inlet and outlet configurations including inverts and pipe connections, storage volume, system footprint, Stormtank elevations Including cover soil requirements, and proximity to structures and slopes. Site design / engineering elements may include but not be limited to the following: • Review elevations and if necessary adjust grading to ensure the chamber cover requirements are met. • Evaluating site -specific information on soil conditions andior bearing capacity • Assessing the bearing resistance (allowable bearing capacity) of the sub -grade soils and the depth of foundation stone with consideration for the range of expected soil moisture conditions 1.0 StormTank® Assembly StormTank® Modules Stornri modules are delivered to the site as palletized components requiring simple assembly No special equipment, tools or bonding agents are required, only a rubber mallet A single worker can typically assemble a module in two minutes. ASSEMBLY INSTRUCTIONS. 1. Place a platen on a firm level surface and insert the eight 8 P 9 ( ) columns into the platen receiver cups Firmly tap each column with a rubber mallet to ensure the column is seated. 2. Place a second platen on a firm level surface. Flip the previously assembled components upside down onto the second platen, aligning the columns into the platen receiver cups. 3. Once aligned, seat the top assembly by alternating taps, with a rubber mallet at each structural column until all columns are firmly seated. SIDE PANEL 4. If side panels are required, firmly tap the top platen upward to raise the top platen. Insert the side panel into the bottom platen. 5. Align the top of the side panel with the top platen and firmly seat the top platen utilizing a rubber mallet. GENERAL NOTES: • Remove packaging matenal and check for any damage. Report any damaged components to a StormTank(X Distributor or Brentwood personnel. • StormTankiR) components are backed by a one year warranty, when installed per manufacturer's recommendations 2 0 Basin Excavation 1 Stake out and excavate to elevations per approved plans. Excavation Requirements a Sub -grade excavation must be a minimum of 6" (152 mm) below designed StormTank® Module invert. b. The excavation should extend a minimum of 12" (305 mm) beyond the StormTank® dimensions in each length and width (an additional 24` [610 mm] in total length and total width) to allow for adequate placement of side backfill material c Remove objectionable material encountered within the excavation, including protruding material from the walls. d. Furnish, install, monitor and maintain excavation support (e.g., shoring. bracing. trench boxes, etc.) as required by Federal, Provincial and Local Laws, Ordinances, Regulations and Safety Requirements 3.0 Sub -Grade Requirements 1. Sub -grade shall be unfrozen, level (plus or minus 1 %), and free of lumps or debris with no standing water, mud or muck- Do not use materials nor mix with materials that are frozen and/or coated with ice or frost. 2. Unstable, unsuitable and/or compromised areas should be brought to the Engineer's attention and mitigating efforts determined prior to compacting the sub -grade. 3 Sub -grade must be compacted to 95% Standard Proctor Density or as approved by the Engineer of Record. It code requirements restrict subgrade compaction, it is the requirement of the geotechnical Engineer to verify that the bearing capacity and settlement criteria for support of the system are met. ' The Engineer of Record shall reference Brentwood StormTank Module Installation document Appendix A for minimum soil bearing capacity required based on Load Rating and to cover depth. Minimum P Y eq 9 P P soil bearing capacity is required so that settlements are less than 1" through the entire sub -grade and do not exceed long-term 1 /2" differential settlement between any two adjacent units within the system. Sub -grade must be designed to ensure soil bearing capacity is maintained throughout all soil saturation levels. 4 0 Leveling Bed Installation 1. Install geotextile fabric and/or liner material, as specified. a Geotextile fabric shall be placed per manufacturer's recommendations b. Additional material to be utilized for wrapping above the system must be protected from damage until use. 2. After the geotextile is secured, place a minimum 6" (152 mm) Leveling Bed. 1901 Raymond Ave S w f � lC� Renlnn, WA 98057. L4 IG Ph: (425)-254-1075 wall le( layfiicldgrnup.cont a. Material should be a 3i4" (19 mm) angular stone meeting SINGLE STACK MODULE SYSTEM Appendix B -Acceptable Fill Material. b. Material should be raked free of voids, lumps, debris, sharp objects and plate vibrated to a level with a maximum 1 % slope Total Storage Volume 1287.20 11' Module Storage Volume 1287.20 fir' 3. Correct any unsatisfactory conditions Stone Storage Volume 0 ft' 5.0 StormTank® Module Placement System Footprint 1054 fr' 1. 1. Install geotextile fabric and/or liner material, as specified. a Geotextile fabric shall be placed per manufacturer's recommendations- Estimated Geotextile Fabric 569 yd Estimated Stone Volume 67 11 yd' b. Additional matenal to be utilized for wrapping above the system must be protected from damage until use. Excavation Acquired 156.15 yd' 2. Mark the footprint of the modules for placement. Minimum Excavation Depth 4.00 ft a. Ensure module perimeter outline is square or similar prior to Module placement- Stone Type" Clear Stone b. Care should be taken to note any connections, ports or other irregular units to be placed. 3 Install the Individual modules by hand, as detailed below Stone Void Space 40°•� Module Tvpe 25 ScTic, S 1-1 x a. The modules should be installed as shown in the StormTank® submittal drawings with the short side of perimeter modules facing outward, except as otherwise required. 9516 Edmonds Way b. Make sure the top/bottom platens are in alignment in all directions to within a maximum 1/4" (6 4 mm) Edmonds W A , c. For double stack configurations REV Record of Changes Date By I. Install the bottom module first. DO NOT INTERMIX VARIOUS MODULE HEIGHTS ACROSS LAYERS. Backhlling prior to proceeding to secorc Q I rcliminary Drawing 23OC12023 AI, layer is optional. ii. Insert stacking pins (2 per module) into the top Q Fank Re -Size 070Cr2024 I'M platen of the bottom module in Place the upper module directly on top of the bottom module in the same direction, making sure to engage the pins. 4. Install the modules to completion, taking care to avoid damage to the geotextile and/or liner material. 5. Locate any ports or other penetration of the StormTank(D. a Install portslpenetrations in accordance with the approved ktgi LN°nsb- 0112023-7612 submittals, contract documents and manufacturer's eab ham Supplementary Notes recommendations. 6. Upon completion of module installation, wrap the modules in I).- is, AK ' hrrkdBv JF geotextile fabric and/or liner � s,•aL- N I'S rlar 230C 1'2023 a. Geotextile fabric shall be wrapped and secured per W .\ • XEL 17115 LAYUU1' DKA 1NG W'AS YRI:YARI:ll lY) SC'YYORl '171L L (rL LLR UI manufacturer's recommendations RFUORD FOR T1R: PROPOSED SYSTEM. TT iS T71F RFSPONSmR.iTY OF TITF b- Seal any portslpenetrations per Manufacturer's ENGINEER OF RE.CORDTO REVIEW IHE INFORMATION AND ENSURE 1HA,r requirements 111L LAYOU 1 AND DLSIGN 1S 1N FULL C 0161PL1ANUL W1111 ALL AYPLICABLL i AWS AND RF('FJr.ATiONS 1\-7) THAT THE STORMTI\-K SYSTEM HAS REF\ Notes • If damage occurs to the geotextile fabric or impermeable liner, repair the material in accordance with the geotextile/liner Manufacturer's recommendations. DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCE: WI III 13RI-N 1 WOOD'S REQUIRFMLIN 1'S. LAY1 ILLD IX,)LS NOlR1iV1LW OR APPROVL PLANS, SIZING OR DLS1GNS Sbca: 06 OF 07 ANSI B Size Page (Horizontal) REV. NO. I DESCRIPTION I INITIALS I DATE 1011412024 CITY OF EDMONDS APPROVED FOR CONSTR UCTION FOR: . PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR DATE E(a INSIGHT E N#`aI �M NG M P.O. BOX - 1478 EVERETT, WA 98206 (425) 303-9363 (425) 303-9362 FAX INFO@ INS IGHTENGINEERING.NET SITE ADDRESS: 9516 EDMONDS WAY EDMONDS, WA 98020 TAX ACCOUNT NO.'S: 27033600100900 PLN2023-0029 NE 114, SEC. 36, TWP. 27N. RGE. 3 E., W.M. CASCARA DWG FILENAME DESIGNED BY: DATE: SCALE: JOB NO.: 22122 1 DNK 0312812024 1 "--10' 1 22-1226 SHEET STORMTANK DETAILS C3.4 Attach �P..�w g. 140 Pi rxl?n,?q_nn,?a I PI ni7n7q_nn?Q GENERAL NOTES: NE 114, SEC. 36, TWP. 27N. RGE. 3 E., W.M. KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON 1. ALL MATERIALS AND WORK SHOWN ON THESE PLANS SHALL CONFORM TO THE CITY OF EDMONDS STANDARD PLANS AND DETAILS, THE FOLLOWING SPECIFICATIONS AND CODES, AND ALL OTHER APPLICABLE LOCAL MUNICIPAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL CODES, RULES AND REGULATIONS: - CURRENT INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE (IBC) - 2016 WSDOT/APWA STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROAD, BRIDGE AND MUNICIPAL CONSTRUCTION - WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY STORMWATER MANAGEMENT MANUAL FOR THE PUGET SOUND BASIN (CURRENT EDITION) 2. STANDARD PLAN AND TYPE NUMBERS INDICATED ON THESE DRAWINGS REFER TO CITY OF EDMONDS STANDARD DETAILS, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 3. A COPY OF THESE APPROVED PLANS MUST BE ON THE JOBSITE WHENEVER CONSTRUCTION IS IN PROGRESS. 4. DEVIATIONS FROM THESE PLANS MUST BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD AND THE LOCAL GOVERNING AUTHORITY. 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL RECORD ALL APPROVED DEVIATIONS FROM THESE PLANS ON A SET OF 'AS -BUILT" DRAWINGS AND SHALL SUMMARIZE ALL ASBUILT CONDITIONS ON ONE SET OF REPRODUCIBLE DRAWINGS FOR SUBMITTAL TO THE OWNER PRIOR PROJECT COMPLETION AND ACCEPTANCE. A SET OF AS -BUILT DRAWINGS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY OF EDMONDS PRIOR TO FINAL APPROVAL OF THE BUILDING OCCUPANCY/FINAL PROJECT APPROVAL. 6. ELEVATIONS SHOWN ARE IN FEET. SEE SURVEY FOR BENCHMARK INFORMATION. 7. THE LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND SITE FEATURES SHOWN HEREON HAVE BEEN FURNISHED BY OTHERS BY FIELD SURVEY OR OBTAINED FROM AVAILABLE RECORDS AND SHOULD THEREFORE BE CONSIDERED APPROXIMATE ONLY AND NOT NECESSARILY COMPLETE. IT IS THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO INDEPENDENTLY VERIFY THE ACCURACY OF ALL UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN AND TO FURTHER DISCOVER AND PROTECT ANY OTHER UTILITIES NOT SHOWN HEREON WHICH MAY BE AFFECTED BY THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THIS PLAN. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATION, DEPTH, SIZE, TYPE AND CONDITION OF EXISTING UTILITY LINES AT CONNECTION OR CROSSING POINTS BEFORE TRENCHING FOR NEW UTILITIES. ENGINEER ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE COMPLETENESS OR ACCURACY OF THE EXISTING UTILITIES AND SITE FEATURES PRESENTED ON THESE DRAWINGS. ENGINEER SHALL BE NOTIFIED IMMEDIATELY OF CONFLICTS THAT ARISE. 8. CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE AND PROTECT ALL UTILITIES DURING CONSTRUCTION AND SHALL CONTACT THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES LOCATION SERVICE (1-800-424-5555) AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 9. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL CONDITIONS AND DIMENSIONS AT THE PROJECT SITE BEFORE STARTING WORK AND SHALL NOTIFY OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE OF ANY DISCREPANCIES. 10. PIPE LENGTHS WHERE SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE AND MAY CHANGE DUE TO FIELD CONDITIONS. 11. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN A COPY OF THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT (WHERE APPLICABLE) AND SHALL THOROUGHLY FAMILIARIZE HIMSELF WITH THE CONTENTS THEREOF. ALL SITE WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN STRICT COMPLIANCE WITH THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THIS REPORT. 12. STRUCTURAL FILL MATERIAL AND PLACEMENT SHALL CONFORM TO THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE PROJECT GEOTECHNICAL REPORT. 13. SUBGRADE SOILS IN ALL AREAS WHERE RAIN GARDENS, INFILTRATION OR PERVIOUS PAVEMENT IS TO BE PLACED SHALL BE DELINEATED AND PROTECTED AT ALL TIMES FROM COMPACTIVE ACTIVITIES (i.e. HEAVY EQUIPMENT, STOCKPILING). 14. MANHOLES, CATCH BASINS, UTILITIES AND PAVEMENT SHALL BEAR ON MEDIUM DENSE TO VERY DENSE NATIVE SOIL OR COMPACTED STRUCTURAL IF SOIL IS DISTURBED, SOFT, LOOSE, WET OR IF ORGANIC MATERIAL IS PRESENT AT SUBGRADE ELEVATION, REMOVE AND REPLACE WITH COMPACTED STRUCTURAL FILL PER GEOTECHNICAL REPORT. 15. SEE SURVEY AND ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR DIMENSIONS AND LOCATIONS OF BUILDINGS, LANDSCAPED AREAS AND OTHER PROPOSED OR EXISTING SITE FEATURES. 16. SEE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR PERIMETER FOUNDATION DRAINS. FOUNDATION DRAINS SHALL BE INDEPENDENT OF OTHER SITE DRAIN LINES AND SHALL BE TIGHTLINED TO THE STORM DRAIN SYSTEM WHERE INDICATED ON THE PLANS. 17. ALL REQUIRED STORMWATER FACILITIES MUST BE CONSTRUCTED AND IN OPERATION PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY PAVEMENT UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. 18. ALL ROOF DRAINS, PERIMETER FOUNDATION DRAINS, CATCH BASINS AND OTHER EXTERNAL DRAINS SHALL BE CONNECTED TO THE STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 19. ALL FOOTING DRAINS SERVING BUILDINGS, WALLS, ROCKERIES, ETC. SHALL CONNECT TO THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM DOWNSTREAM OF THE SITE STORMWATER DETENTION SYSTEM. 20. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN AND PAY FOR ALL PERMITS REQUIRED FOR INSTALLATION OF ALL SITE IMPROVEMENTS INDICATED ON THESE DRAWINGS. 21. A SEPARATE IRRIGATION PERMIT MUST BE OBTAINED FROM THE CITY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. PRIOR TO FINAL CONSTRUCTION ACCEPTANCE, PROVIDE TO THE CITY WATER QUALITY TECHNICIAN, A COPY OF THE BACKFLOW TEST REPORT. TEST REPORTS CAN BE FAXED TO 425-744-6057 OR EMAILED TO JEFF.KOBLYK®EDMONDSWA.GOV. BACKFLOW TESTING SHALL BE COMPLETED BY THE OWNER ANNUALLY THEREAFTER. 22. AS A MINIMUM REQUIREMENT, ALL DISTURBED AREAS ON AND OFF SITE SHALL BE RETURNED TO THE EQUIVALENT OF THEIR PRECONSTRUCTION CONDITION IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPROPRIATE REQUIREMENTS AND STANDARDS. 23. ALL DISTURBED SOIL AREAS SHALL BE COMPOST AMENDED AND SEEDED OR STABILIZED BY OTHER ACCEPTABLE METHODS FOR THE PREVENTION OF ONSITE EROSION AFTER THE COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION. SEE EROSION CONTROL PLANS FOR SPECIFIC GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL REQUIREMENTS. 24. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP OFF -SITE STREETS CLEAN AT ALL TIMES BY SWEEPING. WASHING OF THESE STREETS WILL NOT BE ALLOWED WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL. 25. THIS PROJECT IS NOT A BALANCED EARTHWORK PROJECT. BOTH EXPORT AND IMPORT OF SOIL AND ROCK MATERIALS ARE REQUIRED. 26. SLOPE OF FINISHED GRADE SHALL BE CONSTANT BETWEEN FINISHED CONTOURS OR SPOT ELEVATIONS SHOWN. 27. FINISHED GRADE SHALL SLOPE AWAY FROM BUILDING WALLS AT MINIMUM 57. SLOPE FOR A MINIMUM DISTANCE OF 10 FEET. 28. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR AND SHALL INSTALL AND MAINTAIN SHORING AND BRACING AS NECESSARY TO PROTECT WORKERS, EXISTING BUILDINGS, STREETS, WALKWAYS, UTILITIES AND OTHER EXISTING AND PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS AND EXCAVATIONS AGAINST LOSS OF GROUND OR CAVING EMBANKMENTS. CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR REMOVAL OF SHORING AND BRACING, AS REQUIRED. 29. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN APPROVAL FROM THE CITY AND FOLLOW CITY PROCEDURES FOR ALL WATER SERVICE INTERRUPTIONS, HYDRANT SHUTOFFS, STREET CLOSURES OR OTHER ACCESS RESTRICTIONS. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT RELOCATE OR ELIMINATE ANY HYDRANTS WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM THE FIRE MARSHAL. 30. COORDINATE AND ARRANGE FOR ALL UTILITY CONNECTIONS, UTILITY RELOCATIONS AND/OR SERVICE INTERRUPTIONS WITH THE AFFECTED OWNERS AND APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES. CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING UTILITIES SHALL BE MADE ONLY WITH ADVANCE WRITTEN APPROVAL OF THE AUTHORITIES GOVERNING SAID UTILITIES. 31. ALL UTILITIES SHALL BE PLACED UNDERGROUND. 32. EXISTING UTILITY LINES IN SERVICE WHICH ARE DAMAGED DUE TO CONSTRUCTION WORK SHALL BE REPAIRED AT CONTRACTOR'S XPENSE AND INSPECTED AND ACCEPTED BY CITY OF EDMONDS AND OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO BACKFILLING. 33. UTILITY LOCATIONS ARE GENERALLY SHOWN BY DIMENSION, WHERE NO DIMENSIONS ARE INDICATED, LOCATIONS MAY BE SCALED FROM DRAWINGS. FIELD ADJUSTMENTS SHALL BE APPROVED BY OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE AND CITY. 34. FIELD STAKE ALL UTILITY STUBS AT THE PROPERTY LINE. 35. TRENCH BACKFILL OF UTILITIES LOCATED WITHIN THE CITY RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL BE COMPACTED TO 959'. COMPACTION TEST REPORTS SHALL BE PROVIDED TO THE CITY PRIOR TO PAVING. 36. WHERE NEW PIPE CLEARS AN EXISTING OR NEW UTILITY BY 6" OR LESS, PLACE POLYETHYLENE PLASTIC FOAM AS A CUSHION BETWEEN THE UTILITIES. 37. SEE MECHANICAL DRAWINGS (WHERE APPLICABLE) FOR CONTINUATION OF SITE UTILITIES WITHIN THE BUILDING. 38. SEE ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS (WHERE APPLICABLE) FOR EXTERIOR ELECTRICAL WORK. 39. SEE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS (WHERE APPLICABLE) FOR SITE IRRIGATION SYSTEM. 40. PIPE MATERIAL AND SIGNAGE SUBMITTALS SHALL BE PROVIDED TO CITY ENGINEERING DIVISION FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. PIPE SPECIFICATIONS PLACEMENT REQUIREMENTS FOR CULVERTS AND STORM SEWER INSTALLATION SHALL BE AS INDICATED IN THE WSDOT/APWA SPECIFICATIONS SECTIONS 7-02 AND 7.04, RESPECTIVELY, AND AASHTO SPECIFICATIONS. PIPE MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH SECTION 9-05 OF THE WSDOT/APWA SPECIFICATIONS WITH THE FOLLOWING CLARIFICATIONS: 1. DOUBLE WALLED (SMOOTH INTERIOR) CORRUGATED POLYETHYLENE PIPE, MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF AASHTO M 252 IN 8 INCH SIZE AND AASHTO M 294S IN SIZES 12" THROUGH 36" IS AN ACCEPTABLE ALTERNATIVE FOR SCHEDULE A CULVERT PIPE AS SHOWN ON WSDOT/APWA STANDARD PLAN B-17 AND FOR STORM SEWERS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THESE STANDARDS. THE ENDS OF THE PIPE SHALL BE BEVELED TO MATCH THE SLOPE. CORRUGATED POLYETHYLENE PIPE SHALL NOT BE USED WHEN BEVELED SLOPES ARE FLATTER THAN 4:1. FOR ANY PIPE LENGTH SECTION THAT IS TO BE BEVELED ON THE END THE MINIMUM LENGTH OF THE UNBEVELED PORTION OF THE PIPE SHALL BE 6 FEET. THE PIPE SHALL BE INSTALLED IN A DESIGN A TRENCH AS SHOWN ON STANDARD DRAWING 9-210. FOR BURIAL DEPTHS EXCEEDING 15 FEET, THE PIPE SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS AND THESE STANDARDS. 2. IN PRIVATE DEVELOPMENTS, THE USE OF NON -SMOOTH INTERIOR CORRUGATED POLYETHYLENE (AASHTO M-294, TYPE "C) IS ALLOWED, EXCEPT WHERE THESE INSTALLATIONS ARE OR CAN REASONABLY BE EXPECTED TO BECOME PART OF THE COUNTY MAINTAINED DRAINAGE SYSTEM. J. GALVANIZED CORRUGATED STEEL PIPE SHALL HAVE ASPHALT COATING TREATMENT 1 AS SPECIFIED IN WSDOT/APWA SPECIFICATION SECTION 9-05.4(3). ALUMINIZED STEEL PIPE MAY BE USED WITHOUT TREATMENT 1. 4. PWRIB SEAMLESS GRAVITY SEWER PIPE AND FITTINGS CONFORMING TO ASTM F794 AND UNI-B-9 FOR 8" -15" DIAMETER, ULTRA -RIB PVC STORM SEWER PIPE CONFORMING TO ASTM F794 & UNI-B-9 FOR 8"-24" DIAMETER, AND ULTRA-CORR PVC SEWER AND DRAIN PIPE CONFORMING TO ASTM F949 AND ASTM F794. MATERIALS ALLOWED FOR STORM PIPE SYSTEMS LABELED AS "SD':- - PLAIN CONCRETE. - DUCTILE IRON (WATER SUPPLY, CLASS 50 OR 52). - REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE. - CORRUGATED HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENE PIPE (CPEP) - SMOOTH INTERIOR (SEE NOTE 1). - POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (PVC) SEWER PIPE. - HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENE PIPE (HDPP). - PVC SMOOTH INTERIOR WITH CORRUGATED RIB EXTERIOR (SEE NOTE 4). MATERIALS ALLOWED FOR STORM PIPE SYSTEMS LABELED AS 'RCP".. - REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE. - DUCTILE IRON (WATER SUPPLY, CLASS 50 OR 52). BANK RUN GRAVEL FOR • TRENCH BACKFILL .,.�.,.�.�.�.�.�.�.�.�.�.�.�.,., MINUS) I.) .: II OD 9-03.19 PER COE OR SUITABLE EXCAVATED MATERIAL AS APPROVED BY CITY ENGINEER (SEE NOTE 2 BELOW) 6" MIN LLJ v BEDDING IN (518- MINUS) 1- IPER COE • I : ' �1/ � O BELOW) 6" MIN NONE�� 8" MIN I~ --� 8" MIN NOTE: I SEE NOTE 1TABLE 1: MAX. TRENCH PATCH PAY WIDTH 1. MAXIMUM WIDTH OF TRENCH AT TOP PIPE TRENCH DEPTH MAX PAY WIDTH • 36" FOR PIPE UP TO AND INCLUDING 1 ' - 4' 40" 12" NOMINAL DIAMETER 4' - 10' 60" • I.D. PLUS 18" FOR PIPE LARGER THAN 12" 10' - 20' 72" NOMINAL DIAMETER 2. REFER TO CITY OF EDMONDS MODIFICATIONS TO DIVISION 9 OF WSDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. FOR MATERIAL GRADATION AND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. J. TRENCH BACKFILL SHALL MEET A MINIMUM COMPACTON OF 957. DENSITY PER ASTM D 1557. D. ,.0 Ill.D APPROVED BYVISION DATE STANDARD DETAIL_ D. GEBERT 07/28/05 TYPICAL TRENCH SECTION D.GEBERT 04 02 07 DATE SCALE DWG NO. Est 1891D R. ENGLISH 7/24/01 NTS E4.2 1 TYPICAL TRENCH SECTION C'S• 0 NOT TO SCALE STD. NO. E4.2 SEE APPLICABLE STANDARD DETAILS FRAME AND GRATE PIPE ALLOWANCES PIPE MATERIAL MAXIMUM INSIDE DIAMETER REINFORCED OR 12" PLAIN CONCRETE ALL METAL PIPE 15" CPSSP• 12' (WSDOT STD SPEC 9-05.20) SOLID WALL PVC 15" (WSDOT STD SPEC 9-05.12.(1)) PROFILE WALL PVC 15" (WSDOT STD SPEC 9-05.12(2)) y ?A • CORRUGATED POLYETHYLENE S. STORM SEWER PIPE g �\ \2" 4" 6" OR 12" ll� NOTES: RISER SECTION 1. CATCH BASINS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH WSDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATION 9-05.50(3). 2. AS AN ACCEPTABLE ALTERNATIVE TO REBAR, WELDED WIRE FABRIC HAVING A MIN. AREA OF 0.12 SQUARE INCHES PER FOOT MAY BE USED. WELDED WIRE FABRIC SHALL COMPLY TO ASTM A497 (AASHTO M 221). WIRE FABRIC SHALL NOT • ��' BE PLACED IN KNOCKOUTS. 6 g, 3. APPLY NON -SHRINK GROUT TO INSIDE AND OUTSIDE OF ALL JOINTS, RINGS, RISERS AND FRAMES. 4. ROUND KNOCKOUTS MAY BE ON ALL 4 SIDES, WITH MAX DIAMETER OF 20". KNOCKOUTS MAY BE EITHER ROUND OR "D" SHAPE. `Q 5. THE MAX DEPTH FROM THE FINISHED GRADE TO THE PIPE INVERT IS 5'-0". 6. THE TAPER ON THE SIDES OF THE PRECAST BASE SECTION AND RISER SECTION SHALL NOT EXCEED 1/2"/FT. 7. CATCH BASIN FRAME AND GRATE SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. MATING SURFACES SHALL BE FINISHED TO ASSURE NON -ROCKING FIT WITH ANY COVER POSITION. (MEASUREMENT AT THE TOP OF THE BASE) 8. VERTICAL EDGE OF RISER SHALL NOT BE MORE THAN 2" PRECAST BASE SECTION FROM VERTICAL EDGE OF CATCH BASIN WALL. REVISION DATE CITY OF EDMONDS JANUARY 2018 CATCH BASIN TYPE I PUBLIC WORKS STANDARD DEPARTMENT DETAIL s! IF,9n APPROVED BY R. ENGLISH SD-303 4 CATCHBASIN TYPE I U-0 NOT TO SCALE STD DTL. SD-303 10' EXPANSION DUMMY JOINT JOINT a ° a a d ° ° a ° $ 10' O.C. L5. O.C. PLAN VIEW (NOT TO SCALE) 5' MIN 1' FULL DEPTH 1/2" EXPANSION CURB/GUTTER JOINT MATERIAL dry' SEE R- STD 2% MAX DTL TR-520 - e 1/2" R ° a 4 1/2- R 1" l l 0, `O MIN 5/8" MINUS CSTC ON NATIVE BEARING SOIL SECTION VIEW SEE NOTE 9 NOTES: (NOT TO SCALE) 1. CITY INSPECTION REQUIRED ON FORM WORK PRIOR TO POUR. 2. CONCRETE SHALL BE CLASS 3000. 3. FINISH SHALL BE LIGHT BROOM. 4. SIDEWALK THICKNESS SHALL BE 4". 5. SIDEWALK THICKNESS AT DRIVEWAYS SHALL BE 6" THICK. 6. CURB AND GUTTER SHALL BE POURED SEPARATELY FROM SIDEWALK. 7. LIDS FOR JUNCTION BOXES AND UTILITY VAULTS SHALL BE NON-SKID AS SPECIFIED BY ENGINEER. B. SEE COE STD DTL TR-550 FOR POSSIBLE ROOT BARRIER INSTALLATION. 9. SUBGRADE SHALL BE COMPACTED TO 95% MAXIMUM DENSITY. 10. ALL EDGES WITH EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL HAVE I" RADIUS REVISION DATE CITY OF EDMONDS JUNE 2019 CONCRETE SIDEWALK *_ PUBLIC WORKS STANDARD DEPARTMENT DETAIL FSt. 189,3 APPROVED BY: R. ENGLISH T R - 5 31 2 CONCRETE SIDEWALK DETAIL CU-0 NTS (CITY OF EDMONDS STD DTL TR-531) TRANSITION DRIVEWAY WIDTH OO STANDARD 1/2- PANEL FULL DEPTH CONCRETE 11 EXPANSION JOINT SIDEWALK Q (TYP) O SEE COE STD DTL TR-531 = FO Jgxg5 3> O r 9 w PLANTER / I O6 \ PLANTER CONCRETE CURB Q DRIVEWAY APPROACH AND GUTTER, SEE FLOWLINE 8 3 SIDE SLOPE (TYP) O COE STD DTL SLOPE AS NEEDED TR-520 TO MATCH PLANTER DRIVEWAY APPROACH GRADES DRIVEWAY APPROACH WIDTH VARIES O 5' MIN 8'-12' 2' MIN curca /-��7 2% MAX 9 ARIES SLOPE 1 ROUNDING e \.�\,.\\�� .�\ . /.6 6" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY APPROACH 2. 5/8- MINUS CSTC COMPACTED SUBGRADE 10 SECTION A -A NOTES: O CURB AND GUTTER SHALL BE POURED SEPARATELY FROM SIDEWALK. CITY INSPECTION REQUIRED ON FORM WORK PRIOR TO POUR. 2 CONCRETE SHALL BE CLASS 3000. 3 FINISH SHALL BE LIGHT BROOM. O FULL DEPTH 1/2" THRU EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL BE PLACED AT BACK, SIDES AND FRONT. MAXIMUM EXPANSION JOINT SPACING IS 10' CENTER TO CENTER. WHERE DRIVEWAY WIDTH IS LESS THAN 20% EXPANSION SHALL BE PLACED AT CENTER OF DRIVEWAY. SODRIVEWAY WIDTHS TO BE CONSISTENT WITH CITY STD DTL TR-541. DRIVEWAY WIDTH DOES NOT INCLUDE ADJACENT RAMPS. O6 A MINIMUM 4' RAMP TO BE INSTALLED UNLESS APPROVED OTHERWISE BY CITY ENGINEER. 70 FULL DEPTH 1/2" EXPANSION JOINT REQUIRED BETWEEN CURB AND DRIVEWAY APPROACH. O MAINTAIN 1/2- LIP AT GUTTER ADJACENT TO DRIVEWAY APPROACH. O 2' ASPHALT SAWCUT MAY BE REQUIRED WITH CURB/GUTTER INSTALLATION. REFER TO COE STD DTL TR-520. 10 SUBGRADE SHALL BE COMPACTED TO 95% MAXIMUM DENSITY. 11 INSTALL MINIMUM 5-FT TRANSITION PANEL BETWEEN DRIVEWAYS AND WHEN CONNECTING TO EXISTING SIDEWALK. REVISION DATE EDMONDS DRIVEWAY APPROACH JANUARY 2018 CITY OF TYPE III PUBLIC WORKS STANDARD DEPARTMENT DETAIL ts{ 1890 TR-543 APPROVED By R. ENGLISH DRIVEWA Y APPROACH TYPE-3 DETAIL NOT TO SCALE CITY OF EDMODNS STD DTL TR-543 2' MIN SAWCUT _ 5-1/2' SEE NOTE 10 R=1/2 I R=1" I HMA 4. OR MATCH EXISTING, WHICHEVER IS GREATER 1- BATTER R=1" SEE NOTE 12 N D.D� 5 F?/� a 11 18" STANDARD 6--5/8- MINUS CSTC SEE NOTE 11 MINUS CSTC STANDARD TYPE "A" CURB/GUTTER (NOT TO SCALE) NOTES: 1. CITY INSPECTION REQUIRED ON FORM WORK PRIOR TO POUR. 2. FORMS SHALL BE TRUE TO LINE AND GRADE AND SECURELY STAKED. 3. EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL BE PLACED ADJACENT TO ANY STRUCTURE. 4. EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL BE EVERY 10 FEET. 5. EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL HAVE 1/2" TO 5/8" WIDE PREMOLDED JOINT FILLER. 6. CONCRETE SHALL BE CLASS 3000. 7. FINISH SHALL BE LIGHT BROOM. 8. CURB SHALL BE SPRAYED WITH CLEAR CURING COMPOUND OR SHALL BE COVERED AND KEPT MOIST FOR 72 HOURS. 9. REMOVAL/REPLACEMENT OF CONCRETE CURB SHALL BE FROM EXPANSION TO EXPANSION JOINT, UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY CITY ENGINEER. 10. A 2-FT MINIMUM ASPHALT SAWCUT MAY BE REQUIRED AS DETERMINED BY CITY ENGINEER. 11. CURB/GUTTER SHALL BE 18- OR AS DIRECTED BY CITY ENGINEER. 12. ALL VERTICAL EDGES SHALL BE TACKED. REV SION DATE CONCRETE CURBJANUARY 2018 CITY OF EDMONDS AND GUTTER PUBLIC WORKS STANDARD DEPARTMENT DETAIL E`S t �1890 APPROVED BY: R. ENGUSH T R- 5 2 0 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER DETAIL NOT TO SCALE (CITY OF EDMONDS STD DTL TR-520) REV. NO. I DESCRIPTION I INITIALS I DATE 1011412024 CITY OF EDMONDS APPROVED FOR CONSTR UCTION FOR: . PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR DATE E(a INSIGHT E NGII [ U III NG M P.O. BOX - 1478 EVERETT, WA 98206 (425) 303-9363 (425) 303-9362 FAX INFO@ INS IGHTENGINEERING.NET SITE ADDRESS: 9516 EDMONDS WAY EDMONDS, WA 98020 TAX ACCOUNT NO.'S: 27033600100900 PLN2023-0029 NE 114, SEC. 36, TWP. 27N. RGE. 3 E., W.M. CASCARA DWG FILENAME DESIGNED BY: DATE: SCALE: JOB NO.: 221226-FINAL.DWG DNK 0312812024 1"--10' 22-1226 SHEET GENERAL NOTES CS. 0 AND DETAILS Attach a Packet Pg. 142 PI ni7n,?q-nn7a NE 114, SEC. 36, TWP. 27N. RGE. 3 E., W.M. KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON FA Know what's below. Call before you dig. UTILITY CONFLICT NOTE. CAUTION,• THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING THE LOCATION, DIMENSION, AND DEPTH OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHETHER SHOWN ON THESE PLANS OR NOT, BY POTHOLING THE UTILITIES AND SURVEYING THE HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL LOCATION PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THIS AND THEN SHALL INCLUDE CALLING UTILITY LOCATE @ 1-800-424-5555 POTHOLING ALL OF THE EXISTING UTILITIES AT LOCATIONS OF NEW UTILITY CROSSINGS TO PHYSICALLY VERIFY WHETHER OR NOT CONFLICTS EXIST. LOCATIONS OF SAID UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ARE BASED UPON THE UNVERIFIED PUBLIC INFORMATION AND ARE SUBJECT TO VARIATION. IF CONFLICTS SHOULD OCCUR, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSULT WITH INSIGHT ENGINEERING COMPANY TO RESOLVE ALL PROBLEMS PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH CONSTRUCTION. V, " VEHICULAR ENTRANCE AND EGRESS v \ i D \\ 4 � d d i i 0 ° .. \ \ d a 2 TEMP. GRADING 3 EASEMENT /1 \ � 5 TEMP. CONSTRUCTION \ EASEMENT / / i EX. C. B. RIM=339.15 1.E.=335.27 (18" SW, 12- NE) SCALE: 1 " = 10' 10 5 0 10 20 NE 114. SEC, 36. NT. M. WE. 3 E. RN. K04G,COUATY. R ASH1jN'GTON / tj r 4 rY 1/J • •iIf to" /i eo ewwst y // •� f.• _ •� SCAT fie 1" — 1W b , I,f' � Ips t nit, '•DY6«resM��•�/: 4.y/T' �%.•',f •y •�3,r.� r Tpaty +aerty I✓ p+nny � r , 1 t 1 r r r' twr.ar , • rlr parrnafr� , r t 1 r .f,:...rir.6A0W c211b•11,. rw,.y. f IlIRI r'J.tjlJ[T.1ilTF r �rrThl.�•• .f It—rvr a•a: S - . - •,- r= 'K YTfi]Y. . - 11�1 A Aim Iru•J Y W.A.; 'I'M w11�•r,N 11W W.., r' `I V,•,1 wr Pp~. •f k .A ..LCA war ri ¢,I.—ca, ula .Wh WU � Xi i(tur IM..l 1-M-•:..OA!! en an. Yt a tt la:4c S •r WGr.Y..'r n I,a TV OK- %= O wra., X ..,,a rW :%Aw W SIC t%," .1 rc rr xv eia .a tool uw K W dm"lac NfW6 K fA w.:Ktlr� M:hI..IIJ.►'.t.:t•Mr fiAt.a11•L . Wt +v NM11 .1v +L• i7mtc Wk .0.4. RS.G%tf.! �n FOR: CITY OF EDMONDS APPROVED FOR CONSTR UCTION , PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR DATE REV. NO. I DESCRIPTION I INITIALS I DATE 1011412024 N N N 7 0 3 0 F- m m U SIGNATURE APPROVAL SUPERINTENDENT POSTAL OPERATIONS n K: DATE I NSIGHT E NG1 H EE & W NG CO. P.O. BOX - 1478 EVERETT, WA 98206 (425) 303-9363 (425) 303-9362 FAX INFO@ INS IGHTENGINEERING.NET SITE ADDRESS: 9516 EDMONDS WAY EDMONDS, WA 98020 TAX ACCOUNT NO.'S: 27033600100900 PLN2023-0029 NE 114, SEC. 36, TWP. 27N. RGE. 3 E., W.M. CASCARA DWG FILENAME DESIGNED BY: DATE: SCALE: JOB NO.: 221226-FINAL.DWG I DNK 0312812024 1 "=10' 1 22-1226 SHEET POST OFFICE APPROVAL PLAN C6.0 Attach e Packet Pg. 143 PI n17n7'i-nn,?Q TREE PROTECTION DURING EX. �o VEHICULAR ENTRANCE AND EGRESS o I--,' D A1, 2G EASEMENT AGREEMENT (A.F. #21107, a C 20' W.N.G. EASEMENT (A. F. #9107250421, � a JVAI L KU. \ I \ \I �I � 11 TEMP. GRADING EASEMENT \ 9530 EDMONDS WAY EDMONDS, WA 98020 \ / I TEMP. CONSTRUCTION \ EASEMENT / Know what's below. Call before you dig. UTILITY CONFLICT NOTE. CAUTION.• THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING THE LOCATION, DIMENSION, AND DEPTH OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHETHER SHOWN ON THESE PLANS OR NOT, BY POTHOLING THE UTILITIES AND SURVEYING THE HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL LOCATION PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THIS AND THEN SHALL INCLUDE CALLING UTILITY LOCATE @ 1-800-424-5555 POTHOLING ALL OF THE EXISTING UTILITIES AT LOCATIONS OF NEW UTILITY CROSSINGS TO PHYSICALLY VERIFY WHETHER OR NOT CONFLICTS EXIST. LOCATIONS OF SAID UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ARE BASED UPON THE UNVERIFIED PUBLIC INFORMATION AND ARE SUBJECT TO VARIATION. IF CONFLICTS SHOULD OCCUR, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSULT WITH INSIGHT ENGINEERING COMPANY TO RESOLVE ALL PROBLEMS PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH CONSTRUCTION. 1 L 1 Vim/ NE 114, SEC. 36, TWP. 27N. RGE. 3 E., W.M. KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON 952G EDMONDS WAY EDMONDS, WA 98020 5' PUD EASEMEN . (A. F. #7603220241) SCALE: 1 " = 10' 10 5 0 10 20 # SPECIES 1 WESTERN RED CEDAR (THUJA PLICATA) DBH 103" 2 FLOWERING CHERRY (PRUNUS SERRULATA) 10" 3 WILLOW (SALIX BABYLONICA) Tom TREE PROTECTIONNOTES.- THE LIMIT OF DISTURBANCE (LOD) FOR ALL TREES ARE SET OUTSIDE THE DRIPLINES FOR ABOVE GROUND FEATURES TO PROVIDE PROTECTION FOR THE CROWNS. FOR TREE #1, BECAUSE THE DRIP LINE IS SO BROAD, THERE IS A SECOND LOD FOR BELOW GROUND FEATURES SET A LOCATION TO PROTECT THE ROOT PLATE. ANY WORK WITHIN THE LOD IS TO BE DONE BY HAND. ANY ROOTS DAMAGED WITHIN THE LOD AS LARGE AS 1/2"ARE TO BE HAND CUT. NO CROWN REDUCTION PRUNING. ANY PRUNING TO RAISE THE CROWN IS TO BE DONE BY HAND PRIOR TO DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY OR INITIATING TREE REMOVAL ON THE SITE, VEGETATED AREAS, INDIVIDUAL TREES AND SOIL TO BE PRESERVED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ECDC 23.10.060(B) SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM POTENTIALLY DAMAGING ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO THE FOLLOWING STANDARDS: A. PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING REQUIRED. PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY PERMITTED CLEARING AND GRADING ACTIVITY, A PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING SHALL BE HELD ON SITE WITH THE PERMITTEE AND APPROPRIATE CITY STAFF. THE PROJECT SITE SHALL BE MARKED IN THE FIELD AS FOLLOWS: 1. THE EXTENT OF CLEARING AND GRADING TO OCCUR; 2. DELINEATION AND PROTECTION OF ANY CRITICAL AREAS AND CRITICAL AREA BUFFERS WITH CLEARING LIMIT FENCING; 3. FLAGGING OF TREES TO BE REMOVED AND TAGS ON TREES TO BE RETAINED; AND 4. PROPERTY LINES. B. PLACING MATERIALS NEAR TREES. NO PERSON MAY CONDUCT ANY ACTIVITY WITHIN THE PROTECTED AREA OF ANY TREE DESIGNATED TO REMAIN, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, OPERATING OR PARKING EQUIPMENT, PLACING SOLVENTS, STORING BUILDING MATERIAL OR STOCKPILING ANY MATERIALS, OR DUMPING CONCRETE WASHOUT OR OTHER CHEMICALS. DURING CONSTRUCTION, NO PERSON SHALL ATTACH ANY OBJECT TO ANY TREE DESIGNATED FOR PROTECTION. C. PROTECTIVE BARRIER. BEFORE DEVELOPMENT, LAND CLEARING, GRADING, FILLING OR ANY LAND ALTERATION, THE APPLICANT SHALL: 1. ERECT AND MAINTAIN READILY VISIBLE TEMPORARY PROTECTIVE TREE FENCING ALONG THE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE WHICH COMPLETELY SURROUNDS THE PROTECTED AREA OF ALL RETAINED TREES, GROUPS OF TREES, VEGETATION AND NATIVE SOIL. TREE PROTECTIVE FENCING SHALL BE A MINIMUM HEIGHT OF THREE FEET, VISIBLE AND OF DURABLE CONSTRUCTION; ORANGE POLYETHYLENE LAMINAR FENCING IS ACCEPTABLE. 2. INSTALL HIGHLY VISIBLE SIGNS SPACED NO FURTHER THAN 15 FEET APART ALONG THE ENTIRETY OF THE PROTECTIVE TREE FENCING. SAID SIGN MUST BE APPROVED BY THE DIRECTOR AND SHALL STATE, AT A MINIMUM, "TREE AND SOIL PROTECTION AREA, ENTRANCE PROHIBITED," AND PROVIDE THE CITY PHONE NUMBER FOR CODE ENFORCEMENT TO REPORT VIOLATIONS. 3. PROHIBIT EXCAVATION OR COMPACTION OF SOIL OR OTHER POTENTIALLY DAMAGING ACTIVITIES WITHIN THE BARRIERS; PROVIDED, THAT THE DIRECTOR MAY ALLOW SUCH ACTIVITIES APPROVED BY A QUALIFIED PROFESSIONAL AND UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF A QUALIFIED PROFESSIONAL RETAINED AND PAID FOR BY THE APPLICANT. 4. MAINTAIN THE PROTECTIVE BARRIERS IN PLACE FOR THE DURATION OF THE PROJECT UNTIL THE DIRECTOR AUTHORIZES THEIR REMOVAL. 5. ENSURE THAT ANY APPROVED LANDSCAPING DONE IN THE PROTECTED ZONE SUBSEQUENT TO THE REMOVAL OF THE BARRIERS SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED WITH MACHINERY FROM OUTSIDE THE PROTECTED ZONE OR BY HAND. 6. LIMIT THE TIME PERIOD THAT THE CRITICAL ROOT ZONE IS COVERED BY MULCH, PLYWOOD, STEEL PLATES OR SIMILAR MATERIALS, OR BY LIGHT SOILS, TO PROTECT THE TREE'S CRITICAL ROOT ZONE. 7. IN ADDITION TO THE ABOVE, THE DIRECTOR MAY REQUIRE THE FOLLOWING: A. IF EQUIPMENT IS AUTHORIZED TO OPERATE WITHIN THE PROTECTED ZONE, THE SOIL AND CRITICAL ROOT ZONE OF A TREE MUST BE COVERED WITH MULCH TO A DEPTH OF AT LEAST SIX INCHES OR WITH PLYWOOD, STEEL PLATES OR SIMILAR MATERIAL IN ORDER TO PROTECT ROOTS AND SOIL FROM DAMAGE CAUSED BY HEAVY EQUIPMENT. B. MINIMIZE ROOT DAMAGE BY HAND —EXCAVATING A TWO —FOOT —DEEP TRENCH, AT EDGE OF CRITICAL ROOT ZONE, TO CLEANLY SEVER THE ROOTS OF TREES TO BE RETAINED. NEVER RIP OR SHRED ROOTS WITH HEAVY EQUIPMENT. C. CORRECTIVE PRUNING PERFORMED ON PROTECTED TREES IN ORDER TO AVOID DAMAGE FROM MACHINERY OR BUILDING ACTIVITY. D. MAINTENANCE OF TREES THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION PERIOD BY WATERING AND FERTILIZING. D. GRADE. 1. THE GRADE SHALL NOT BE ELEVATED OR REDUCED WITHIN THE CRITICAL ROOT ZONE OF TREES TO BE PRESERVED WITHOUT THE DIRECTOR'S AUTHORIZATION BASED ON RECOMMENDATIONS FROM A QUALIFIED PROFESSIONAL. THE DIRECTOR MAY ALLOW COVERAGE OF UP TO ONE—HALF OF THE AREA OF THE TREE'S CRITICAL ROOT ZONE WITH LIGHT SOILS (NO CLAY) TO THE MINIMUM DEPTH NECESSARY TO CARRY OUT GRADING OR LANDSCAPING PLANS, IF IT WILL NOT IMPERIL THE SURVIVAL OF THE TREE. AERATION DEVICES MAY BE REQUIRED TO ENSURE THE TREE'S SURVIVAL. 2. IF THE GRADE ADJACENT TO A PRESERVED TREE IS RAISED SUCH THAT IT COULD SLOUGH OR ERODE INTO THE TREE'S CRITICAL ROOT ZONE, IT SHALL BE PERMANENTLY STABILIZED TO PREVENT SOIL EROSION AND SUFFOCATION OF THE ROOTS. 3. THE APPLICANT SHALL NOT INSTALL AN IMPERVIOUS SURFACE WITHIN THE CRITICAL ROOT ZONE OF ANY TREE TO BE RETAINED WITHOUT THE AUTHORIZATION OF THE DIRECTOR. THE DIRECTOR MAY REQUIRE SPECIFIC CONSTRUCTION METHODS AND/OR USE OF AERATION DEVICES TO ENSURE THE TREE'S SURVIVAL AND TO MINIMIZE THE POTENTIAL FOR ROOT —INDUCED DAMAGE TO THE IMPERVIOUS SURFACE. 4. TO THE GREATEST EXTENT PRACTICAL, UTILITY TRENCHES SHALL BE LOCATED OUTSIDE OF THE CRITICAL ROOT ZONE OF TREES TO BE RETAINED. THE DIRECTOR MAY REQUIRE THAT UTILITIES BE TUNNELED UNDER THE ROOTS OF TREES TO BE RETAINED IF THE DIRECTOR DETERMINES THAT TRENCHING WOULD SIGNIFICANTLY REDUCE THE CHANCES OF THE TREE'S SURVIVAL. 5. TREES AND OTHER VEGETATION TO BE RETAINED SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION. CLEARING OPERATIONS SHALL BE CONDUCTED SO AS TO EXPOSE THE SMALLEST PRACTICAL AREA OF SOIL TO EROSION FOR THE LEAST POSSIBLE TIME. TO CONTROL EROSION, IT IS ENCOURAGED THAT SHRUBS, GROUND COVER AND STUMPS BE MAINTAINED ON THE INDIVIDUAL LOTS, WHERE FEASIBLE. CSD CONDITIONNOTES 44' DOUBLE TRUNKS. GENERALLY GOOD CONDITION AND HEALTH. LOCATED WITHIIN THE RIGHT—OF—WAY. SPECIFIED LOD IS 24'FOR ABOVE GROUND FEATURES TO PROTECT THE CROWN AND FOR BELOW GROUND IMPACTS THE LOD IS 15'TO PROTECT THE ROOT PLATE. 22' GOOD CONDITION AND HEALTH. YOUNG AND VIGOROUS. TO BE RETAINED. SPECIFIED LOD IS 12'TO PROTECT THE CROWN AND ROOTS. 16' GOOD CONDITION AND HEALTH. YOUNG AND VIGOROUS. TO BE RETAINED. SPECIFIED LOD IS 10' TO PROTECT THE CROWN AND ROOTS. CONSTRUCTION CHAIN -LINK FENCE OR ORANGE - PLASTIC FENCE FASTENED TO STEEL STAKES/POSTS DRIVEN SECURELY INTO THE GROUND. DEVELOPER SHALL AVOID CRZ WHEN DRIVING STAKES/POSTS. _ *CRITICAL ROOT ZONE rJ� � (CRZ) �Q I 3 FEET p EXISTING SIGNIMANT I INSTALL AT I LOCATION AS SHOWN ON I I PLANS z 3 INCHES OF COMPOSTED -' WOODCHIPS REQUIRED I WITHIN THE CRZ. FENCING 3-FEET TREE PROTECTION AREA, OUTSIDE OF THE CRZ ENTRANCE PROHIBITED REPORT VIOLATIONS TO CrrY OF KENMORE AT 425-398-8900. * THE CRITICAL ROOT ZONE (CRZ) IS THE AREA WHERE THE TREE'S ESSENTIAL MASS OF ROOTS IS LOCATED. THE AREA SURROUNDING THE TREE AT A DISTANCE WHICH IS EQUAL TO ONE FOOT FOR EVERY INCH OF TRUNK DIAMETER AT BREAST HEIGHT (DBH) OR THE AREA OF A CIRCLE WITH RADIUS EXTENDING FROM A TREE'S TRUNK TO A POINT NO LESS THAN THE END OF A TREE'S LONGEST BRANCH, WHICHEVER IS GREATER. 1 TREEPROTECTIONDETAIL C7 O N. T. S. REV. NO. I DESCRIPTION I INITIALS I DATE 1011412024 I ,crrA7n I LIMIT OF DISTURBANCE (LOD) (/ CRITICAL ROOT ZONE (CRZ) i 112 CRITICAL ROOT ZONE (CRZ) TREE TO BE REMOVED TREES TO BE PROTECTED TREE TO BE ADDED CITY OF EDMONDS APPROVED FOR CONSTR UCTION FOR: . PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR DATE INSIGHT EN61HEE &WNO CO. P.O. BOX - 1478 EVERETT, WA 98206 (425) 303-9363 (425) 303-9362 FAX INFO@ INS IGHTENGINEERING.NET SITE ADDRESS: 9516 EDMONDS WAY EDMONDS, WA 98020 TAX ACCOUNT NO.'S: 27033600100900 PLN2023-0029 NE 114, SEC. 36, TWP. 27N. RGE. 3 E., W.M. CASCARA DWG FILENAME DESIGNED BY: DATE: SCALE: JOB NO.: 221226—FINAL.DWG DNK 03128/2024 1"__ 10, 22-1226 SHEET TREE RETENTION PLAN C7, 0 Attach e Packet Pg. 144 PI n17n7'i_nn7a i EX. F.H. Know what's below. Call before you dig. UTILITY CONFLICT NOTE. NE 114, SEC. 36, TWP. 27N. RGE. 3 E., W.M. ' KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON (TO BE REMOVED) ...... ,, k 0....... RIM=339.15 pp ° I.E.=335.27 (18" SW, 12" NE).-. `.. p 41 EX. .. 1 POWER POLE f. _ ..... ........... � .., ° � Al EX. (o .......' d ,. �� p i ' : • / 5' PUD EASEMENT - (A. F. #7603220241) d DIKE RACK 1�� / , \ SCALE: I " = 10' LEGEND I F 49na7 j �q� ►� EXISTING MONUMENT (AS SHOWN) 10 5 0 10 20 / �Q , \ �a SECTION 114 CORNER NOT FOUND EX. WM.......................,... ° ..\ s. a ° / s6, \ \ SECTION CORNER NOT FOUND (TO BE RELOCATED TO THE.�.:.:'.' BACK O SIDEWALK)/::::::: �;:�,' i d �� \ # FOUND REBAR/CAP OR I.P. (IRON PIPE) ° \ ...... �• ......., .. '. ,., ..... (C) CALCULATED EX. SSMH ....'.'.•.'..,......'.'..' ' RIM=338.59 ,> // ° 5� \\ \ (P) PLAT :.:.:.:.:.:.:.I.E=329.8 . / . ° Q. a BIKE �e M ° MEASURED ................................/�.,... ..... \ i d < . /% %r \ \ ................ TH-3 BIKE s \ \ TBR TO BE REMOVED RELOCATED \\ R.O.W. RIGHT-OF-WAY PROPOSED ° - ° a 19510 EDMONDS WAY )X CLUSTER) ° ° d �Ok 1 \ �Q ok�� \ \358� EDMONDS, WA 98020 P.O.B. POINT OF BEGINNING Q cal �e TH-2 . ...... Y 4 a / TH-1 Q / s ° . d °. ...... \ \ / 1-11 POLY LINESTI'P.) \O °Q // PRC: 0+60.17�� 1` �/ / ° VEHICULAR` ENTRANCE AND EGRESS EASEMENT AGREEMENT (A.F. #21107i, ` o 90' �...�.. 0427) \ SS . STUB )01 TH-5 /cl 0 D CLEANOUT (TYP.) 18' SEWER EASEME,, _ �o (A-F.. J 1982543 �� 1 WATE o a L� METER (IYP.) �� % TH4 a o v TEMP. GRADING)\ \\ �- /'� s EASEMENT SHORT PLAT 1 A.F. J2003011 \\ \ �. °. PROPOSE \ 19 FF a D / 0- ° PROTECTION 9530 EDMONDS WAY FENCE EDMONDS, WA 98020 \ / ROPOSED 6' S1DE / / D SEWER (TYR) �o�s� TEMP. CONSTRUCTION \ 9520 EDMONDS WAY EASEMENT EDMONDS, WA 98020 \ DRIVEWAY SHARED WITH 9600 EDMONDS WAY AND TWO LOTS TO SOUTH \ FUTURE APARTMENT CAUTION.• THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING THE LOCATION, DIMENSION, AND DEPTH OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHETHER SHOWN ON THESE PLANS OR NOT, BY POTHOLING THE UTILITIES AND SURVEYING THE HORIZONTAL / \ AND VERTICAL LOCATION PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THIS AND THEN SHALL INCLUDE CALLING UTILITY LOCATE @ 1-800-424-5555 POTHOLING ALL OF THE / / i o 12k02 65 EXISTING UTILITIES AT LOCATIONS OF NEW UTILITY CROSSINGS TO PHYSICALLY o P: VERIFY WHETHER OR NOT CONFLICTS EXIST. LOCATIONS OF SAID UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ARE BASED UPON THE UNVERIFIED PUBLIC / INFORMATION AND ARE SUBJECT TO VARIATION. IF CONFLICTS SHOULD OCCUR, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSULT WITH INSIGHT ENGINEERING COMPANY TO \ 12+03 RESOLVE ALL PROBLEMS PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH CONSTRUCTION. T, CENTERLINE CLF CHAIN LINK FENCE WEF WOOD FENCE W.S. WATER SURFACE EOP EDGE OF PAVEMENT BOW BACK OF WALK GCB STORM DRAIN CATCH BASIN (CB) O SD STORM DRAIN MANHOLE (SDMH) O SS SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE (SSMH) 0Co SANITARY SEWER CLEAN OUT (CO) -0-p POWER POLE -C)GP GUY POLE ❑ WM WATER METER >< WATER VALVE WV FMB MAILBOX \ \ C UTILITY POLE ANCHOR FIRE HYDRANT (2 NOZZLE) t 45fi PI �' N W E ., � 3 VICINITY MAP S f SCALE: 1"=2000' ..- E TYPE I NGPA SIGN - - - - - - - - - PROPOSED WATER PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER PROPOSED STORM DRAINAGE PROPERTY LINE X X EXISTING FENCE LINE /� /� EDGE OF PAVEMENT - - - - XXX EXISTING CONTOURS PROPOSED CONTOURS PRE-EXISTING DRAINAGE PATTERN UTILITIES (POWER, CABLE, TELEPHONE) ❑T TRANSFORMER BOX © POWER VAULT (MR) TO BE REMOVED FDC FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION - CENTERLINE XXX] PROPOSED CONTOUR PROPOSED STORM w/CB PROPOSED SEWER BOUNDARY PROPOSED CONCRETE AREA GAS GAS LINE EQUIPMENTAND PROCEDURE -OH-OH- OVERHEAD POWER LINE BASIS OF BEARING: SHORT PLAT (A.F. #200301175007) SD EXISING DRAINAGE _FM FM EX. FORCE MAIN SS SS EX. SEWER BM W W EX. WATER SNO. CO. PT. #23 MONUMENT IN CASE - 92ND AVE. W. ELEV. = 367.97 DATUM: NAVD 88 N.A.V.D 88-3.64'=NGVD '29 (MSL) L'NGINEER/CONTACT SURVEYOR SEWER & WATER NOTES.' r•U• t5UA /4/0 1,5614 ASH WAY EVERETT WA 98206 EVERETT WA 98204 1. ALL PRIVATE SIDE SEWER CONSTRUCTION REQUIRES A PERMIT AND THE PAYMENT OF A FEE. THE CONTACT: BRIAN R. KALAB, P.E. (509) 630-078J PERMIT APPLICATION WILL REQUIRE THE COMPLETE LEGAL DESCRIPTION, ADDRESS, AND THE (425) 303-9363 EMAIL: MATRIXSURVEYOR@LIVE.COM DIMENSIONS OF THE PROPERTY TO BE SERVED. 2. ALL CONSTRUCTION IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY MUST BE DONE BY A LICENSED SEWER OWNER /APPLICANT CONTRACTOR. JAKE LYON 3. ALL HOUSE PLUMBING OUTLETS MUST BE CONNECTED TO THE SANITARY SEWER. WESTERLY, LLC 320 DAYTON ST, STE 101 4. NO DOWNSPOUT OR STORM DRAINAGE MAY BE CONNECTED TO THE SANITARY SEWER. EDMONDS, WA 98020 JAKE@WESTERLYRE. COM 5. MATERIAL: PIPE - GASKET JOINTED PVC - SDR 35 OR ASTM D-3034 LEGAL DESCRIPTION - GASKET JOINTED DUCTILE IRON CLASS 50 FITTINGS ALL THAT PORTION OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER - GASKETED PVC ASTM D-0034 OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 27 NORTH, - DUCTILE IRON MJ AWWA C153 * ALL FITTINGS MUST BE GASKETED RANGE 3 EAST, W.M., DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: 6. MINIMUM SLOPE. COMMENCING AT A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SAID NORTH 4-INCH DIAMETER PIPE - 2% (114 INCH FALL PER FOOT) HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER 6-INCH DIAMETER PIPE - 1% MINIMUM GRADE DISTANT NORTH 88° 14' 33" EAST 90.00 FEET FROM THE SOUTHWEST MAXIMUM SLOPE ALL PIPE 50% CORNER THEREOF, • THENCE NORTH 02. 54' 05" WEST 274.02 FEET TO THE SOUTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF THE COUNTY ROAD (NOW STATE ROAD 7. PIPES SHALL BE LAID IN STRAIGHT LINE BETWEEN BENDS. MAKE ALL CHANGE IN LINE OR GRADE NO. 1-W); THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID ROAD MARGIN ON A WITH LESS THAN OR EQUAL TO 45 DEGREES. CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 1450.85 FEET AN ARC DISTANCE OF 12.46 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THIS 8. INCREASES IN PIPE SIZE SHALL BE MADE BY MANUFACTURED FITTINGS. DESCRIPTION, THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT AN ARC DISTANCE OF 91.53 FEET, • THENCE SOUTH 25° 29' 40" EAST 130 9. PIPE SHALL BE BEDDED FROM UNDISTURBED TRENCH WALL TO UNDISTURBED TRENCH WALL ON EACH FEET, • THENCE SOUTH 48° 38' 13" 103.96 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF SIDE OF THE PIPE AND FROM 2 INCHES BELOW TO 2 INCHES ABOVE THE PIPE WITH PEA GRAVEL THE LAND CONVEYED TO TILLMAN BURTON DEARING AND WIFE BY DEED OR CLEAN FREE DRAINING SAND. FILED FOR RECORD UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 1354369; THENCE ALONG SAID EAST LINE NORTH 25' 29' 40" WEST 103.95 FEET TO A 10. THE SIDE SEWER SHALL BE INSPECTED BY DISTRICT STAFF PRIOR TO BACKFILLING. THE SIDE SEWER POINT WHICH BEARS SOUTH 02° 54' 05" EAST FROM THE TRUE POINT SHALL BE PLUGGED AND FILLED WITH WATER PRIOR TO CALLING FOR TESTING AND PRESSURE TESTED OF BEGINNING, THENCE NORTH 02. 54' 05" WEST 31.48 FEET TO THE IN THE PRESENCE OF THE DISTRICT INSPECTOR. LEAKAGE RATE SHALL NOT EXCEED 0.31 GAL/HOUR TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, EXCEPT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE STATE FOR 4-INCH PIPE AND 0.47 GAL/HOUR FOR 6-INCH PIPE, PER 100 FEET OF PIPE. OF WASHINGTON UNDER RECORDING NUMBERS 2206152 AND 2206153. 11. SEWER LINES SHALL HAVE A DISTRICT APPROVED CLEANOUT AT EVERY OTHER 45 DEGREES OF BEND, SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. AT LEAST EVERY 100 FEET, OR AT EVERY INCREASE IN PIPE SIZE. 12. A 6-INCH SIDE SEWER WILL BE ALLOWED TO SERVE A MAXIMUM OF FOUR (4) SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCES. 13. A 4-INCH SIDE SEWER WILL BE ALLOWED TO SERVE ONLY ONE (1) SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE. 14. PARALLEL WATER AND SEWER LINES SHALL BE SEPARATED BY 10 FEET HORIZONTALLY WHEREVER POSSIBLE. WATER AND SEWER LINES SHALL HAVE A VERTICAL SEPARATION OF 18 INCHES IF A IL CROSSING IS NECESSARY. 15. ROW RESTORATION AND TRENCHING REQUIREMENTS WITHIN THE ROW SHALL BE PER CITY OF 1 NSIGHT E N61 H E � Ro FIG CO. I EDMONDS REQUIREMENTS. P.O. BOX - 1478 MOTES.- 1. THERE ARE NO PERVIOUS PAVEMENTS PROPOSED. 2. 13D SPRINKLER SYSTEMS REQUIRED. ONE SPRINKLER SYSTEM FOR EACH TOWNHOME UNIT. J. PROVIDE BLUE REFLECTOR 4" FROM THE CENTERLINE ON THE HYDRANT SIDE OF THE ROAD TO INDICATE HYDRANT LOCATIONS IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY OF EDMONDS STANDARD DETAIL E7.1 REV. NO. DESCRIPTION 1011412024 EVERETT, WA 98206 (425) 303-9363 (425) 303-9362 FAX INFO@ INS IGHTENGINEERING.NET SITE ADDRESS: 9516 EDMONDS WAY EDMONDS, WA 98020 INITIALS DATE TAX ACCOUNT NO.'S: 270JJ600100900 PLN2023-0029 NE 1/4, SEC. 36, TWP. 27N. RGE. 3 E., W.M. CASCARA DWG FILENAME DESIGNED BY: DATE: SCALE: JOB NO.: 221226-FINAL.DWG DNK 0312812024 1 `10' 22-1226 SHEET SEWER AND WATER PLAN U0 Attach a Packet Pg. 145 PI n17n7'i_nn7a NE 114, SEC. 36, TWP. 27N. RGE. 3 E., W.M. KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON SIDE SEWER SPECIFICATIONS 1. ALL PRIVATE SICE SEWER CONSTRUCTION REQUIRES A PERMIT AND THE PAYMENT OF A FEE. THE PERMIT APPLICATION WILL REQUIRE THE COMPLETE LEGAL DESCRIPTION, ADDRESS, AND THE DIMENSIONS OF THE PROPERTY TO BE SERVED. 2. ALL CONSTRUCTION IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY MUST BE DONE BY A LICENSED SEWER CONTRACTOR. 3. ALL HOUSE PLUMBING OUTLETS MUST BE CONNECTED TO THE SANITARY SEWER. 4. NO DOWNSPOUT, FLOOR DRAINS, OR STORM DRAINAGE MAY BE CONNECTED TO THE SANITARY SEWER. 5. MATERIAL PIPE -GASKET JOINTED PVC-SDR 35 OR ASTM D-3034 -GASKET JOINTED DUCTILE IRON CLASS 50 FITTINGS -GASKETED PVC ASTM D-3034 -DUCTILE IRON MJ AWWA C153 *ALL FITTINGS MUST BE GASKETED 6. MINIMUM SLOPE: 4-INCH DIAMETER PIPE - 2% (1/4 INCH FALL PER FOOT) 6-INCH DIAMETER PIPE - 1% MINIMUM GRADE MAXIMUM SLOPE: ALL PIPE 507 7, PIPES SHALL BE LAID IN STRAIGHT LINE BETWEEN BENDS. MAKE ALL CHANGE IN LINE OR GRADE WITH LESS THAN OR EQUAL TO 45 DEGREES. 8, INCREASES IN PIPE SIZE SHALL BE MADE BY MANUFACTURED FITTINGS. 9. PIPE SHALL BE BEDDED FROM UNDISTURBED TRENCH WALL TO UNDISTURBED TRENCH WALL ON EACH SIDE OF THE PIPE AND FROM 2 INCHES BELOW TO 2 INCHES ABOVE THE PIPE WITH PEA GRAVEL. 10. THE SIDE SEWER SHALL BE INSPECTED BY DISTRICT STAFF PRIOR TO BACKFILLING. THE SIDE SEWER SHALL BE PLUGGED AND TESTED BY FILLING WITH WATER OR AIR. LEAKAGE RATE SHALL NOT EXCEED 0.31 GAL/HOUR FOR 4-INCH PIPE AND 0.47 GAL/HOUR FOR 6-INCH PIPE, PER 100 FEET OF PIPE FOR WATER OR MUST MAINTAIN 4 POUNDS OF PRESSURE FOR A MINIMUM OF FIFTEEN (15) MINUTES. A DISTRICT INSPECTOR SHALL OBSERVE REMOVAL OF THE PLUG. 11. SEWER LINES SHALL HAVE A DISTRICT APPROVED CLEANOUT INSTALLED AT EVERY 45 OR 90 DEGREE BEND, AT LEAST EVERY 100 FEET, OR AT EVERY INCREASE IN PIPE SIZE. 12. A 6-INCH SIDE SEWER WILL BE ALLOWED TO SERVE A MAXIMUM OF SIX (6) SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCES. 13. A 4-INCH SIDE SEWER WILL BE ALLOWED TO SERVE ONLY ONE (1) SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE. 14. PARALLEL WATER AND SEWER LINES SHALL BE SEPARATED BY 10 FEET HORIZONTALLY WHENEVER POSSIBLE. WATER AND SEWER LINES SHALL HAVE A VERTICAL SEPARATION OF 18 INCHES IF A CROSSING IS NECESSARY. THE SEWER LINE SHALL NOT CROSS OVER THE TOP OF A WATER LINE. 15. RIGHT-OF-WAY RESTORATION SHALL EQUAL OR EXCEED THE ORIGINAL CONDITION. 16. TRENCH BACKFILL UNDER PAVED AREA SHALL BE 5/8-INCH MINUS CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE; FULL TRENCH DEPTHS COMPACTED IN 12-INCH LIFTS. OLYMPIC VIEW WATER & SEWER DISTRICT REVISIONS STANDARD DETAIL SIDE SEWER SPECIFICATI❑NS DATE SCALE DWG N0. 12/20/17 NTS S-1 RING AND COVER r 11�� a Tj_ ADJUSTMENT SECTION 1. (LEVELING BRICKS OR i GRADE RINGS OPTIONAL). N.... ` ... ..... SECTION A -A REFLECTIVE STEPS STRIP 14" •d , 11 1 PRECAST CONE `p (ECCENTRIC UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED). NOTES: w 48". 54", OR 60" 1. POLYPROPYLENE STEPS SHALL BE x MANUFACTURED BY LANE. 2. DRILL (2) 1-1/8" OR 1-1/4' HOLES. 3-1/2" DEEP. APPLY EPDXY IN THE HOLE AND AROUND THE BARBS OF THE STEP. PUSH THE STEP INTO THE m HOLES ALLOWING THE EPDXY TO FLOW II , OUT TO THE SQUARE SHOULDER OF THE STEP. i PRECAST RISER z SECTIONS MANHOLE STEPS 411�ELADDER NTS CONSTRUCT IN FFLD CHANNEL AND SHELF TO THE CROWN OF THE PIPE MORTARPRECAST BASE & FILL INTEGRAL RISER. 000Q°GRAVEL BACIoFILL FOR FOUNDATIONS o°o°6" MIN. COMDACTED DEPTH °°°Q°°° FOR PRECAS- BASE ONLY. I MIN. SEPARATE CAST IN PLACE a BASE OR SEPARATE o PRECAST BASE. REINFORCING STEEL FOR PRECAST BASE 6t INTEGRAL RISER ONLY) m 0.15 SO. It,,/FT. IN H DIRECTION FOR 48" DIAM. 019 SO. K.FT. IN EACH DIRECTION FOR 54 DIAM. a REINFORCING STEEL (FOR SEPARATE BASES ONLY) 0.25 SO. :K./FT. IN EACH DIRECTION FOR 60" DIAM. 0 0.23 SO. IN./FT. IN EACH DIRECTION FOR 48" DIAM. `La� 0.19 SQ. IN./FT. IN EACH DIRECTION FOR 54" DIAM. • 0.25 SQ. IN./FT. IN EACH DIRECTION FOR 60" DIAM. "0" RING 60 MANHOLE DETAIL •'PRECAST` BASE' JOINT ` NTS OLYMPIC VIEW WATER & SEWER DISTRICT REVISIONS STANDARD DETAIL OLYMPIC VIEW MANHOLE DETAIL DATE SCALE DWG N0. 12/20/17 NTS S-4A z 0 I L0 (FOR FUTURE DEVELOPEMENT) PLACE 2X4 AT END OF SIDE SEWER STUB AND CUT TO LENGTH TO INSURE 3 FEET =XTENDS ABOVE GRADE. PAINT TOP 18 INCHES WHITE. IN 3 INCH HIGH LETTERS STENCIL THE NUMBER OF EVEN FEET FROM GROUND ELEVATION TO THE SEWER STUB INVERT. 8 GAUGE WIRE TO BE DOUBLE WRAPPED AROUND PIPE AND 2X4 STAKE AT OR ABOVE FINISHED GRADE. w z LOCKING LAMPHOLE COVER } TO BE PLACED AT FINISHED GRADE (SEE STD SEWER Cr CLEANOUT DETAIL) I� O_ =11 t T I i i iii iT i n 6" WYE AND 45' BEND 6" LATERAL SEWER LINE SLOPE- 2% MIN. TO � 50% MAX 6" TEE fPOSSIBLE SEWER MAIN LOCATION RUBBER JOINT BISCUIT PLUG OR OTHER APPROVED WATERTIGHT PLUG 22.5' OR 45" BEND N 0 T E WHEN TAPPING INTO EXISTING MAIN, CUT IN A NEW TEE W/ MECHANICAL COUPLINGS OR USE A SADDLE AND TAP. PLACEMENT OF TEE SHALL DEPEND ON DEPTH OF SEWER MAIN. AS A MINIMUM, THE TEE SHALL BE PLACED AT A 45 DEGREE ANGLE. 6" TEE POSSIBLE SEWER MAIN LOCATION OLYMPIC VIEW WATER & SEWER DISTRICT REVISIONS STANDARD DETAIL OLYMPIC VIEW TYPICAL SIDE SEWER 12/20/17 NTS S-2 DATE SCALE DWG N0. NOTES: 1. MANHOLES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH AASHTO M199 UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN ON PLANS OR NOTED IN THE WSDOT/APWA STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. 2. HANDHOLDS IN ADJUSTMENT SECTION SHALL HAVE 3" MIN. CLEARANCE. STEPS IN MANHOLE SHALL HAVE 6" MIN. CLEARANCE. SEE DWG_ NO. 2-01 1, "MANHOLE DETAILS." HANDHOLDS SHALL BE PLACED IN ALTERNATING GRADE RINGS OR LEVELING BRICK COURSE WITH A MIN. OF ONE HAND HOLD BETWEEN THE LAST STEP AND THE TOP OF THE MANHOLE. 3. ALL REINFORCED CAST -IN -PLACE CONCRETE SHALL BE CLASS 4000. ALL PRECAST CONCRETE SHALL BE CLASS 4000. NON -REINFORCED CONCRETE IN CHANNEL AND SHELF SHALL BE CLASS 3000. 4. PRECAST BASES SHALL BE FURNISHED WITH CUTOUTS OR KNOCKOUTS. KNOCKOUTS SHALL HAVE WALL THICKNESS OF 2" MIN. UNUSED KNOCKOUTS NEED NOT BE GROUTED IF WALL IS LEFT INTACT. PIPES SHALL BE INSTALLED ONLY IN FACTORY KNOCKOUTS UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. 5. KNOCKOUT OR CUTOUT HOLE SIZE SHALL EQUAL PIPE OUTER DIAM. PLUS MANHOLE WALL THICKNESS. MAX. HOLE SIZE SHALL BE 36" FOR 48" MANHOLE, 42" FOR 54" MANHOLE, 48" FOR 60" M.H. MIN. DISTANCE BETWEEN HOLES SHALL BE 8 6. MANHOLE RINGS AND COVERS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SEC. 7.05 AND MEET THE STRENGTH REQUIREMENTS OF FEDERAL SPECIFICATION RR-F-621 D. MATING SURFACES SHALL BE FINISHED TO ASSURE NON -ROCKING FIT WITH ANY COVER POSITION. 7. ALL BASE REINFORCING STEEL SHALL HAVE A MIN. YIELD STRENGTH OF 60,000 PSI AND BE PLACED IN THE UPPER HALF OF THE BASE WITH 1" MIN. CLEARANCE. 8. FOR HEIGHTS OF 12' OR LESS, MIN. SOIL BEARING VALUE SHALL EQUAL 3,300 POUNDS PER SQUARE FOOT. FOR HEIGHTS OVER 12', MIN. SOIL BEARING VALUE SHALL EQUAL 3,800 POUNDS PER SQUARE FOOT. 9. SEE THE WSDOT/APWA STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS SEC. 7-05.3 FOR JOINT REQUIREMENTS. OLYMPIC VIEW WATER & SEWER DISTRICT REVISIONS STANDARD DETAIL OLYMPIC VIEW MANHOLE SPECIFICATI❑NS DATE SCALE 76W�O. 12/20/17 NTS S-4B ILL z BUILDING w BUILDING 10 CLEANOUT,,CLEANOUT WITH 45' Q BEND AND CAP w w .----GENERAL CLEANOUT�_ NOT TO EXCEED 100' BETWEEN CLEANOUTS ASPHALT SURFACE v12" mi TYPICAL CLEANOUT CLEANOUT (WYE W/ CAP & LAMPHOLE COVER) 12' LAMPHOLE COVER w TO MATCH EXISTING 0 Z GRADE cf .. a J 12" PVC SLEEVE 6" RISER WYE AND 45' BEND -6" DISTRICT STUB 4" OR 6" SIDE SEWER CLEANOUT DETAIL AT PROPERTY LINE & BUILDING j/_ LAMPHOLE COVER PVC S-EEVE CAP NOTE: SIDE SEWER JOINTS SHALL BE GASKETED UNDER ASPHALT OLYMPIC VIEW WATER & SEWER DISTRICT REVISIONS STANDARD DETAIL OLYMPIC VIEW SEWER CLEAN❑UT DETAIL DATE SCALE DWG NO. 12/20/17 1 NTS I S-3 METER TO BE SUPPLIED AND INSTALLED BY DISTRICT. METER AND SETTER TO BE CENTERED VERTICALLY & HORIZONTALLY IN BOX. TO PRIVATE SERVICE. II � B �D 30' MAX LIEU DESCR EB-0 A. SERVICE SADDLE 1"SADDLE & COPPER SETTER.: B. 1" CORPORATION STOP CORP. SERVICE C. 1" COPPER TUBING D. COPPER METER SETTER E. METER BOX F. COMP. x COUPLING (HORIZONTAL OR VERTICAL INLET) G. INSTALL. BURIED METALLIC MARKER TAPE. TAPE SHOULD READ "CAUTION BURIED WATER BELOW". CARLTON INDUSTRIES INC., BLACKBURN MFG. CO. OR EQUAL. NOTES: I. REFER TO OVWSD APPROVED MATERIALS LIST FOR MATERIALS TO BE USED. 2. PROVIDE BLOCK OUT FOR METER BOXES IN DRIVEWAYS. PREAPPROVAL REQUIRED. SEE DWG W-14 OLYMPIC VIEW WATER & SEWER DISTRICT REVISIONS STANDARD DETAIL WATER METER AND I -INCH SERVICE CONNECTION DETAIL DATE semi-- DWG NO. 11/29/21 NTS W-1A Know what's below. Cal I before you dig. UTILITYCONFLICTNOTL: CAUTION.• THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING THE LOCATION, DIMENSION, AND DEPTH OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHETHER SHOWN ON THESE PLANS OR NOT, BY POTHOLING THE UTILITIES AND SURVEYING THE HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL LOCATION PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THIS AND THEN SHALL INCLUDE CALLING UTILITY LOCATE 0 1-800-424-5555 POTHOLING ALL OF THE EXISTING UTILITIES AT LOCATIONS OF NEW UTILITY CROSSINGS TO PHYSICALLY VERIFY WHETHER OR NOT CONFLICTS EXIST. LOCATIONS OF SAID UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ARE BASED UPON THE UNVERIFIED PUBLIC INFORMATION AND ARE SUBJECT TO VARIATION. IF CONFLICTS SHOULD OCCUR, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSULT WITH INSIGHT ENGINEERING COMPANY TO RESOLVE ALL PROBLEMS PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH CONSTRUCTION. REV. NO. I DESCRIPTION I INITIALS I DATE 1011412024 OLYPMIC VIEW WATER AND SEWER DISTRICT APPROVED FOR WATER AND SEWER CONSTRUCTION DISTRICT ENGINEER OR ASSIGNEE DATE E (a INSIGHT EN#`II [ IEROWG M P.O. BOX - 1478 EVERETT, WA 98206 (425) 303-9363 (425) 303-9362 FAX INFO@ INS IGHTENGINEERING.NET SITE ADDRESS: 9516 EDMONDS WAY EDMONDS, WA 98020 TAX ACCOUNT NO.'S: 27033600100900 PLN2023-0029 NE 114, SEC. 36, TWP. 27N. RGE. 3 E., W.M. CASCARA DWG FILENAME DESIGNED BY: DATE: SCALE: JOB NO.: 22122 1 DNK 0312812024 1 "=10' 1 22-1226 SHEET SEWER NOTES AND DETAILS U 0 Attach a Packet Pg. 146 PI n17n,?q_nn7a CASCARA T DESIGN REVIEW REV 2 04/11/2024 75 } • SOLID DOT INDICATES UPDATED SHEETS > > O OPEN DOT INDICATES UNCHAGED SHEETS �n W W (REFER TO PREVIOUS ISSUE) U U U ❑ SUBMITTED FOR INFORMATION ONLY 0 ry 0 0 REVISED & SUBMITTED FOR INFORMATION ONLY ® CNN SHEET REMOVED FROM SET o 0 0 X NOT SUBMITTED .. . O N INDEX: C)C) INDEX: ISURVEY 1/1 PLAN: 1"=20' TOPOGRAPHIC & BOUNDARY SURVEY 101 Sl SITE PLAN 00101 C1.0 COVER SHEET • • • C1.1 EXISTING FEATURES MAP • • • C2.0 GRADING PLAN • • • C2.1 SWPP PLAN 000 C2.2 GRADING AND TESC NOTES & DETAILS • • • C3.0 ROAD, DRAINAGE & UTILITY PLAN • • • C3.1 SHARED DRIVEWAY PROFILE • • • C3.2 DRAINAGE DETAILS • • • C4.0 FRONTAGE IMPROVMENTS • • • C5.0 GENERAL NOTES AND DETAILS • • • C6.0 POST OFFICE APPROVAL PLAN • • • C7.0 TREE RETENTION PLAN • • • C8.0 SEWER AND WATER PLAN • • • C8.1 SEWER NOTES AND DETAILS • • • L-1 LANDSCAPE PLAN • • • L-2 LANDSCAPE PLAN • • • L-3 LANDSCAPE PLAN • • • L-4 IRRIGATION PLAN • • • L-5 IRRIGATION PLAN • • • INDEX: ARCHITECTURE • • • DR D VIEWS • • • DR03 STREET PERSPECTIVES • • • DR04 STREET PERSPECTIVE • • • DR06 3D VIEWS WITHIN CONTEXT • • • DR07 LIGHTING- Night View • • • IA001 I PROJECT DATA I•I•I•I I IA100 I SITE PLAN 1010101 A200 11 /8" = 1' -0" FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL 1-2 1010101 A201 11 /8" = 1' -0" FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL 3 & ROOF 1010101 A300 ELEVATIONS - EAST & NORTH • • • A301 ELEVATIONS - WEST & SOUTH • • • A310 SECTIONS • • • A320 POWERLINE SETBACK SECTION • • • OWNHO SITE INFORMATION: LOCATION: 9516 Edmonds Way ZONING: RM-EW SITE AREA: 11,571 SF LEGAL DESCRIPTION: SEC 36 TWP 27 RGE 03RT-1 F1-6A) BEG SW COR N 1 /2 N E 1 /4 N E 1 /4 TH E 90FT TH NO2*54 05W 274.02FT TO SELYMGN CO RD TH NELY ALG SD CO RD 12.46FT TPB TH CONT ALG CRV SD CO RD 91.53FT TH S25*29 40E 130FT TH S48*38 13W 103.96FTTAP WH BEARS S25*29 40E 130FT FIR SD CO RD TH N25*29 40W 103.95FT TAP WH BEARS S02*54 05E FIR TPB TH NO2*54 05W 31.48FT TO TPB SUBJ ESE PUD LESSST HWY PARCEL #: 27033600100900 OWNER: CASCARA LLC PROJECT DESCRIPTION: NEW CONSTRUCTION WITH 6 TOWNHOUSE. 3- STORY BUILDING WITH 12 PARKING STALLS PROVIDED ON GROUND FLOOR OCCUPANCY/TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: PARKING: S-2/VA RESIDENTIAL: R-2/VA SPRINKLERS: NFPA NO. OF STORIES: 3 ABOVE GRADE; 35' HT BASED ON RM-EW- 16.30.030.A.4(a) (1) & (3) NO. OF TOWNHOUSES: 6 NO. OF PARKING STALLS: 12 TOTAL BUILDING AREA: 1 1,224 SF EDMONDS, WA CONTACT INFORMATION: WESTERLY LLC 320 Dayton St, Suite 101 Edmonds, WA 98020 Contact Jack Lyon e/jake4westerlyre.com p/425.422.0053 d/Arch LLC 2412 Westlake Ave. N, Suite 3 Seattle, WA 98109 Contact: Matt L. Driscoll e/ mattdMdarchllc.com p/ 206.547.1761 Landscape: Civil Engineer: Surveyor: Transportetion Engineer: ►ma's �i SITE M N U) Z > 0 O J Q U r N U Vatiti� N )zzj CD N (n QN N 0 0 w Q p � z W L� O FW- H- G 2 Cn = H = U = oc �3 w M m aW Q N O ~ E N w N N V)�0:� 0020202 U 0 0 0 co CV N N 00 IDN N N w o Ln' 0 oho Lvm W LU ry W i N O N O BY: d/Arch Llc #: Se.a_ttIe, WA d 0 c 0 U c a� 0 d N an N 0 0 M N 0 N Z J a E s L) 0 a PLN2-023- I Packet Pg. 147 I I g. 148 NOTES: a 1. FOR SUMMARY: PROJECT DATA. SEE A001 2. EXISTING GRADE ELEVATIONS are taken from survey by others. See SURVEY. 3. For BUILDING HEIGHTS; See BUILDING ELEVATIONS, A301-A302. 4. For AVERAGE GRADE calculation, see Al 00 (below) 5. SITE UTILITIES are all available along Edmonds Way SITE INFORMATION: LOCATION: 9516 Edmonds Way ZONING: RM-EW SITE AREA: 11,571 SF LEGAL DESCRIPTION: SEC 36 TWP 27 RGE 03RT-1 F1-6A) BEG SW COR NI/2 N E 1 /4 N E 1 /4 TH E 90FT TH NO2*54 05W 274.02FT TO SELYMGN CO RD TH NELY ALG SD CO RD 12.46FT TPB TH CONT ALG CRV SD CO RD 91.53FT TH S25*29 40E 130FT TH S48*38 13W 103.96FTTAP WH BEARS S25*29 40E 130FT FIR SD CO RD TH N25*29 40W 103.95FT TAP WH BEARS S02*54 05E FIR TPB TH NO2*54 05W 31.48FT TO TPB SUBJ ESE PUD LESSST HWY PARCEL #: 27033600100900 OWNER: CASCARA LLC PROJECT DESCRIPTION: NEW CONSTRUCTION WITH 6 TOWNHOUSE. 3- STORY BUILDING WITH 12 PARKING STALLS PROVIDED ON GROUND FLOOR OCCUPANCY/TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: PARKING: S-2/VA RESIDENTIAL: R-2/VA SPRINKLERS: NFPA NO. OF STORIES: 3 ABOVE GRADE; 35' HT BASED ON RM-EW- 16.30.030.A.4(a) (1) & (3) NO. OF TOWNHOUSES: 6 NO. OF PARKING STALLS: 12 TOTAL BUILDING AREA: 1 1,224 SF A=+338.00' +338' 1 I O I +338' I I I I I I E= +338.74' C=+338.80' — — — — — — — — III 142'� 0 AV.GRADE_CALC A100 SCALE: 3/64" = Y-0" +339' B= +339.38' e� 3.80')/ 4 F=+342.00' D= +342.00' 01 +344' H=+344.34' ULATION Oo rint: SF 0 LOT COVERAGE CALCULATION A100 SCALE: 3/64" = Y-0" LOT AREA: 11,571 SF LOT COVERAGE: 3,325 sf / 11,571 sf = 28.74% 5206 SF) 45% POWER POLE VEHICULAR ENTRANCE AND EGRESS 20' EASEMENT AGREEMENT (A.F. #21 10719) 5 STREET PARKING STALLS BELONG TO ADJACENT PROPERTY #5&#6 TREES TO BE REMOVED, AGREEMENT SIGNED BY ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER 25' FY DRIVEWAY SHARED WITH 9600 EDMONDS WAY AND TWO LOTS TO SOUTH PROTECTION FENCE v # 1 &#2 TREES TO RETAI N #3 TREE TO BE REMOVED DRIVEWAY/HAMMER HEAD FOR 9516 EDMONDS WAY Revisions: Rev 2 1. Added grades at building to match building ht revision I +344' Site Plan SCALE: 3/32" = 1'-0" J t N 0 z w O U w Q 0 M a� U) z > 0-) o 3 Q 'r— U a) CC) (.0 N U N o MNC6 NCO Q N o� z N 2 H= �3 w m aW N ~ E r N w N N O W0202 0000 (y) M 't CN CN CN 000 CN N N w O L Q r N 0 O O O Lvm z Q J W F- V) N 0 N V 0 BY: d/Arch Llc #: Seattle. WA N 7 0 z c 0 F- M U U) M U P L N 200_0 Packet Pg. 149 NOTES: cX 1. FOR SUMMARY: PROJECT DATA. S 2. EXISTING GRADE ELEVATIONS are survey by others. See SURVEY. 3. For BUILDING HEIGHTS, See BUILD ELEVATIONS, A301-A302. 4. For AVERAGE GRADE calculation 5. SITE UTILITIES are all available alo Edmonds Way 6. For POWERLINE SETBACK at Level A320 DRIVEWAY SHARED WITH 9630 EDMONDS WAY AND TWO LOTS TO SOUTH 5 STREET PARKING STALLSBELONG TO 9630 EDMONDS WAY DRIVEWAY TO SOUTH LC A 5094 S +34'z" ` FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL 1 02 FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL 2 SCALE: 1 /8 - 1 -0 __ SCALE: 1 /8 - 1'-0" 0 4' 8' 16' 0 4' 8' 16' M a� U) z >o`� Eo J Q C U r -Z � � C V U y M C0J V�atiti� N L co CN O C 6 N cn QN V J t N O N SO z w O U ui Q 0 p � z N 2 H= I- O M Q W N ~ E — N w N N V)�Q:� 0020202 U 000 (y) co I- CV N N 000 N N N w O U-5 Q N 0 O O O W C� O >Z o O0 0 Q w �o o1- Q U V) Q J W LU I Z Q J ry O O J LL BY: d/Arch Llc #: Seattle, WA - 0 t c 0 0 L :.i U d t c 0 1= 0 d N Cn N O O M N O N Z J a c m E s 0 a Revisions: Rev 2 1. Added grades at building to match building ht revision PLN2 ,l Packet Pg. 150 1 NOTES: 1 . FOR SUMMARY: 2. EXISTING GRAD survey by others. 3. For BUILDING HE ELEVATIONS, A301 4. For AVERAGE G (below) 5. SITE UTILITIES arE Edmonds Way 1 A201 FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL 3 SCALE: 1 /8" = 1'-0" 0 4' 8' 16' I / I / I / I / 60' - 7 1 /2" 00, " / 12" " / 12" - / 12" A" / 12" ---4" el 373.68' " / 12" " / 12" el 373.68' ae el 373.68' ,. / 12" el 371.32' 4" / 12" 4" / 12" 4., / 12" el 371.32' i59' - 3 1 /4' " / 12" 4" / 12" -el 371.32' 2 A201 Roof 1 B SCALE: 1 /8'' = 1'-0'' 0 4' 8' 16' M a� U) z >oo`� � J Q C U r � � r N U y M V�>Qtiti� N �LO O C 0 N W QN V t N O N M1 Z w 0 U ui Q 0 p z 4J IL> O G 2 Vf 2 H = �3 w O M M Q W Q N ~ E — N LU N N 0 02 02 02 U 0 0 0 (y) CY) I- N N N O O O N N N w O Lo Q N 0 O CDO z Q J ry OH 0 00 LL 01::� N O N BY: d/Arch Llc #: Seattle. WA-- d 0 t c 0 0 L :.i U c d t v to 0 d N Cn N O O M N O N Z J a c m E s 0 a Revisions: Rev 2 1. Added roof elevations at building highest pt to match building ht revision PLN2 'ni 1 Packet Pg. 151 NOTES: 1 . FOR SUMMARY: PROJECT DATA. SEE A001 2. EXISTING GRADE ELEVATIONS are taken from survey by others. See SURVEY. 3. For BUILDING HEIGHTS; See BUILDING ELEVATIONS, A301-A302. 4. 35' BUILDING HEIGHT base on RM-EW 16.30.030.A.4(a) (1) & (3) 5. For AVERAGE GRADE calculation, see Al 00 NORTH ELEVATION ECDC 16.30 55% of build materials mL recycled con indigenous. 5 EAST ELEVATION MAX. HE 374'-b li Fiber Cement I Batten and Bo( ECDC 16.30.0 of building face salvaged, recy, based or indig( jk AVG. GR �339'-r6 1 i 2 A300 EAST ELEVATION SCALE: 3/16'' = 1'-0'' 0 4' 8' 16' eile7--W,L NORTH ELEVATION A3oo SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" 0 4' 8' 16' BLDG A BHT 1 6 1 /2" DOF.A 7 3/4" EL 3.A � 7 3/4" EL 2.A 9 3/4" '\DE_1 61/ EL 1 38'-6" ROOF .A � 368' - 7 3/4" V LEVEL 3.A � 360' - 7 3/4" LEVEL 2.A � 350' - 9 3/4" 1 LEVEL 1 B � 338'-66"" 1 M a� U) z > 0-) Eo J Q ( U r� M r N U y M a� CO a) NCs U-)�oFA (6 � N U) N I V J t N O N 0 lJ z w O U w Q n Z w O U o z W L> O Vf 2 H = �3 w l- O M aW N E — N � N N U U U ��0:� 0 0 0 (y) CY) I- CV N N 000 N N N >�Ce Q N 0 O O O cn w N 2 Z 0 3� Q U V) Q U TV c) Q LU 0 E w Cr N O N BY: d/Arch Llc #: Seat#e. WA 0 t c 0 0 L U d E t c� 0 d ca Cn Cn N O O M N O N Z J a E s a Revisions: Rev 2 1. Lowered Building 2 to compy with ECDC 16.30.030, 25' + 5' w/4:12 pitch 2. Added roof elevations at building highest pt to match building ht revision PLN20 Packet Pg. 152 1 NOTES: 1. FOR SUMMARY: PROJECT DATA. SEE A001 2. EXISTING GRADE ELEVATIONS are taken from survey by others. See SURVEY. 3. For BUILDING HEIGHTS, See BUILDING ELEVATIONS, A301-A302. 4. 35BUILDING HEIGHT base on RM-EW 16.30.030.A.4(a)(1) & (3) 5. For AVERAGE GRADE calculation, see A100 WEST ELEVATION MAX. HEIC � 374' - 6 1 /2' Ljlk ROOF.A «368' - 7 3/4" LEVEL_3.A '-73/4" C Lr ( � LEVEL 2.A �J 350' - 9 3/4" jhAVG. GRAI _339' - 6 1 /2' L EL 1 A 338' - 6" SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" 371.32' 371.32' jk_MAX.HEIGHT-2 — 371 ' - 4 3/4" Fiber Cement Panel Batten and Board \ \ \ 0 ECDC 16.30.030.B.1 At least M 55% of building facade materials must be salvaged, recycled content, bio-based or . indigenous. 0 0 Z=L- 0 AVG.GRADE 2 " 341'-43/4- — — — — — — — — — — - BLDG B 2 SOUTH ELEVATION A301 SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" 371.32' 0 O (D GHT_2 � 4 3/4 -- "N.-Irm-90 vel 3B 69' i5- 0" 1 ✓EL 2 B � i49' -_ 411 �VG.GRADE_2 341'-43/4" V ✓EL B �38'-6" Roof ley 366' - 6" — Level 3 B � 359' - 00" LEVEL 2B_A 349' - 4" 7710 — LEVEL 1 338' - 6" Revisions: Rev 2 1. Lowered Building 2 to compy with ECDC 16.30.030, 25' + 5' w/4:12 pitch 2. Added roof elevations at building highest pt to match building ht revision M a� U) z > 0-) Eo J Q C U r 00 � N U V atiti� L) CN CN O C6 N U) Q (N o z N 2 H= l- O M Q W N z w O ui Q 0 4- ~ E — N w N N V)�ry 00202ry U o00 (y) co I- CV N N 000 (N N N w O U-5 Q N 0 O - O C/) LU C� O _ >- >Z o O1-- 0 w �o o" Q U Cn Q U 06 w c� Z O w � J L U Cn BY: d/Arch Llc #: ettle A } 1 l P L N 2 - Packet Pg. 153 NOTES: 1. FOR SUMMARY: PROJECT DATA. SEE A001 2. EXISTING GRADE ELEVATIONS are taken from survey by others. See SURVEY. 3. For BUILDING HEIGHTS; See BUILDING ELEVATIONS, A301-A302. 4. 35' BUILDING HEIGHT base on RM-EW 16.30.030.A.4(a)(1) & (3) 5. For AVERAGE GRADE calculation, see A100 MAX. HEIGHT_- �J 374' --6 1 /2" R 36- 8'7 � 7 3/4" Lh LEVEL %J 360' - 7 3/ 3/4" 35LEVEL 2.A 0'-93/4" AVG. GRADE-1 339' - 6 1 /2" h'rL - A 6" SECTION 1-1 A310 SCALE: 3/16'' = 1'-0'' jk_KOOF.A_ 368' - 7 3/4" LEVEL 3.A 360' - 7 3/4" LEVEL 2.A 350' - 9 3/4" LEVEL 1 A 338' - 6" I** • 'A CV a a 0 1MA . HEIGHT_- 374' - 6 1 /2" 1 O I zo AV GRADE_- 39' - 6 1 /2" V M X.HEIGHT_2 � 71 ' - 4 3/4" LI 0 Roof 1 B � 366'�6" 1 Level 3 B 359' - 0" LEVEL 2 B 349' - 4" 3.GRADE_2 341 ' - 4 3/4" LEVEL 1 B 338' - 6" M a� z > 0-) F- JQ7 r� M r N U y M a� CO �a�� N C0 �CN OC6 �NW N I V J t N O N 0 lJ z w 0 U w Q 0 o z W L> O Vf 2 H = l- O M Q W N ~ E — N CW N N V) � Q:� 0 02 02 02 U 000 (y) co I- CV N N 000 N N N w O U-5 Q N 0 O O t) Z 0 U w cn BY: d/Arch Llc #: Settle -WA 0 0 M L :.i U rn c d t C) to 0 d N Cn N O O M N 0 N z J a s a Revisions: Rev 2 1. Lowered Building 2 to compy with ECDC 16.30.030, 25' + 5' w/4:12 pitch 2. Added roof elevations at building highest pt to match building ht revision PLN I Packet Pg. 154 W a. W WWWW D� WWWW Wes' WWWWWWWy BW s WWwWWW - �eJ� a s W W w WWW M OO WA, WWyWW-� WW� -W U) -�W yW WW -------- POWERLINE CLR. U z \ - > 0) E W y W J W W O 44 o � � � N U $� yyWWW UMatiQoU B W MAKHEIGHT_2 Q N "- CO \ WWWWW � CDLq \ WWWW 371'-43/4" o O �� Wy�WWW �N(n QN a W W _ _ Roof 1 B� ° W y 366' - 6"I �. WWwWWW ❑ ❑ ` LK-�� Level 3B 5 \ W w y l i ii I \ w y N _ 359 - 0 U W � 03 Cq LEVEL 2 B � o y ° \\ W W 349' - 4" \� W yyW\WWWWW F= — — AVG.GRADEE LEVELIA L1 B 341 ' 4 3/4" \ W LLY L / W 338' 6" 338' - 6" Lu Z cV O � a WWWW WWW\ WWW o WW 0 Q o ° W W � W W � U POWERLINE CLEARANCE Z E -N A320 w SCALE: 1 " = 10'-0'' V) 0 w 002020 U p p p co CM1I N Q O O O d . Lu O L r c� Q N r Cl) p CDO O N O O M 3 POWERLINE SETBACK - PLAN N J A320 SCALE: 1/16'' = 1'-0'' a c m E s a 15'-2" RADIUS FROM WIRE 1 w cry O Z 0 =_- V) CD � Q w v) - P- w Z w O O w IL L/) BY: d/Arch Llc #: Seattle, WA M6 PLN2023-0 Packet Pg. 155 NOTES; 1. FOR SUMMA 2. EXISTING GR survey by oche 3. For BUILDINC ELEVATIONS, A, 4. 35' BUILDINC 16.30.030.A.4(c IETRIC M a� U) z >o`� Fo J Q C U r� m r N U y M a�COCN If CD N N N U) Q N V J t N O N M1 Z w O U w Q 0 p z Vf 2 H = l- O M Q W N ~ E — N CW N N V) � Q:� O 02 02 02 U 000 (y) Co I- CV N N 000 N N N w O U-5 Q N 0 O O O Lvm V) w 0 c`M N O N BY: d/Arch Llc #: Soattle,,WA 0 t c 0 0 L :.i U c d t C) to 0 d N Cn N O O M N O N Z J a c m E s 0 a Revisions: Rev 2 1. Lowered Building 2 to compy with ECDC 16.30.030, 25' + 5' w/4:12 pitch PLN Packet Pg. 156 NC 1 . FC 2. EX surVE 3. Fo ELEV 4.35 16.3( Revisions: Rev 2 1. Lowered Building 2 to compy with ECDC 16.30.030, 25' + 5' w/4:12 pitch M N U) z >o`� Eo J Q C U r -Z � � N U y m C) : ti3: N � O (C) N (n QN V J t N O N Z w O U ui Q n p z N 2 H= l- O M Q W N 4- ~ E — N CW N N V) � ry O 02 02 ry U o00 (y) M CV N N 000 N N N w O U-5 Q N 0 O - O LU O Z >b O0 O w �o o1- U V) Q U V) w 0 c`M O BY: d/Arch Llc #: Snaffle, WA, PLN Packet Pg. 157 3-� PITCHED ROOF FIBER CEMENT P BATTEN AND BO) ENTRY CANOPY BATTEN AND BOARD FIBER CEMENT PANELS 3D View 2 DR03 SCALE: 2 3D View 3 DR03 SCALE: Revisions: Rev 2 1. Lowered Building 2 to compy with ECDC 16.30.030, 25' + 5' w/4:12 pitch M N U) Z > 0 OJ Q � � U r m � N U y (� �C�J V�atiti� m CD co CN N W QN V N O N (fl z W 0 U w Q 0 p z Vf 2 H = � 3 w l- O M Q W N CW ? N N V) � Q:� 0 02 02 02 U 000 (y)MI- 0 0 0 w o Ln Q N 0 O O O t/) LU C� 0 _ >- Z 00 O `W^ V o1- Q U V) Lvm V) w U w n cn rV w n w w cn N O N BY: d/Arch Llc #: Seattle, WA 0 t c 0 0 L :.i N f� U N C d t v to 0 a N Cn N O O M N O N Z J a c m E s 0 a Att �cQkE= PLN2023-0 Packet Pg. 158 1 �Y FIBER CEMENT PAID BATTEN AND BOAR[ BATTEN AND BOARD FIBER CEMENT PANELS 3D View 4 DR04 SCALE: M Cll Z > 0-) O J Q ( U r� m r N U y M a�COJ a) CN �CN oco N W QN p z N 2 H= l- O M Q W N Z w O U w Q n 4- ~ E — N CW N N V) � ry O 02 02 ry U o00 Nco CCN N 000 N N N N 0 o-o C/) LU C� O _ >- Z C) O0 0 1 w �o o1- U V) Lvm w U w cr) rV w n w w rV cn N O N O BY: d/Arch Llc #: SeQttle, VGA 2 3D View 5 DR04 - SCALE: Revisions: Rev 2 1. Lowered Building 2 to compy with ECDC 16.30.030, 25' + 5' w/4:12 pitch P L N 2� 3131 Packet Pg. 159 �s . a"' A t t 5 • G V � F' PA � � t I TAMP a . Y ' :.• _.. •i .l c. a � . Dy � � ` y•�� y , f I kv j � k�'? V.i.�'.�':_�L�.'irKi..iW •� �.. . . ..�.-:%emu rak�iYC��:l� J IIIII.0 NMI OWN OWN Mommomm low ti " R=, y . I L mmmmm1NM1 --_ ONEENNION IMENNOINE fool r r�rL�•f or 416 ra •?� _` stir j�a�. '+ j -+ i iA Zq i,�� :•♦.i. ram•%i�:~' t�1�. ',.J .�p.�. � J �JtL' t 11 • `r_•r•� f N �AM hid,�• Y !i i L �,. y` Y ��tr;T r'E �'�it'7\iT.ri .�s_ �!.r *al.• }� •f �VW ; .ysis.3j1►,!'�;��",*'� '�n,� v.i k1ir„y?,•_t ` % L r'/_4f.i�ir� 1+! • ��w <��1 i ~' t . ..rL i..t a�•{ f.}.��• I/_ ter. .v •'i •� �. "� sour •• _'-' n"' �f I 1. 7 • � t POP; or oil +�� ! WONEENES mNEEMEN �•4 - d ,�:�� t� _ It .01 • ! '*'L ♦ it � � Y y•' ��f ��/� � a � �' , lG �• is ti r♦ v; n �.µl-`ck L�"•�eS�►�: ~ � j *C�AZ ��Si ��A� �• - I YVu-�".._.. f WWI .tip# i�r`'�..�.`�� ,IS�•'-� •.•�1 ,i•.�� Y \( L I A •4 /� i� � I • ors- < '.�t, s �^" � � � �«, X ai ti' � --- _ - W:�II„ w oft ki It �� i `� Imo\ \ 1� "'� J'' �' R•' .,vas �� . � - Ar �I ++' ++y t + + No r + .' + l ' + r++++ +�*t�++� C - + + + t4+1 1; +++ **++++++, + + + Tom. ,. f++ Lam•' D 1 ; -+ D 1 #J . D2 . +` . D2 P1; 1�t,''� .-D2 D2 -'iP1 D1 +�} - TYPE III LANDSCAPING TYPE II LANDSCAPING TYPE 11 LANDSCAPING ' o 'c NORTH ■ IMAGE L44� 44 no LIGHTING SCHEDULE SYMBOL IITEM LOCATION DESCRIPTION D-1 OUTDOOR SCONE LED EXTERIOR ENTRY MANUFACTURER: PHILLIPS DOOR PRODUCT/ITEM NUMBER: SLIM SURFACE LED SIZE: 5" TRIM/FINISH: ALUMINUM/ BLACK CONTACT- N/A D-2 DOWN -LIGHT SURFACE GARAGE DOOR MANUFACTURER: PHILLIPS MOUNTED LED PRODUCT/ITEM NUMBER: SLIM SURFACE LED SIZE: 5" TRIM/FINISH: ALUMINUM/ BLACK CONTACT: N/A P-1 OUTDOOR LANDSCAPE EXTERIOR PATHWAY MANUFACTURER: PHILLIPS PATH LIGHT LED PRODUCT/ITEM NUMBER- PATH LIGHT SIZE: 2.375" TRIM/FINISH: ALUMINUM/ BLACK CONTACT: N/A M N U) Z > 0 O JQ�-r m � N U c� �c�J V�atiti� E N (o N (n QN V t N O N Z w 0 w Q o z N 2 H= M aW N -__ ~ E — N Lu N N V ry O 02 02 ry U o o 0 (y) CY) I- 000 L o Q — N 0 O O O N 0 N BY: d/Arch Llc #: Seattle, WA At6caR7G7 PLN2023-0 Packet Pg. !_ SHOFFNER CONSULTING 1015 10th St. Mukilteo, WA 98275 Mobile: (206)755- 9407 tony@tonyshoffner.com November 11, 2022 Jake Lyon Westerly, LLC 320 Dayton St. Suite 101 Edmonds, WA 98020 RE: Tree Inventory Report - Cascara, 9516 Edmonds Way, Edmonds, WA N d Jake: y 0 This report is provided to report on the inventory I conducted of the trees on the 3 property of the proposed Cascara project site in the City of Edmonds, WA. The 0 accompanying tree inventory map shows the locations, the tree numbers and the I- information on species and trunk dbh for the surveyed trees. The inventory and this report are provided to address EMC 23.10. 1.0 Professional Experience and Credentials Following is a summarization of my experience and credentials as a consulting arborist: • Master of Science in Urban Horticulture from Center for Urban Horticulture, University of Washington, 1996. Focus of study and thesis was nursery production of Pacific madrone (Arbutus menziesii) and establishment into a natrual/urban ecosystem. • ISA Certified Arborist since 1996. • Tree Risk Assessment Qualified since 2012. • Consulting arborist, 1996-present. • Wetland Biologist, 1996-1998 • Other related experience: City of Everett Urban Forestry, summers 1989-1992; Natural Resource Management staff and Bellevue Botanical Garden staff, City of Bellevue, 1996-1997. 2.0 Site Conditions and Proposed Development The project site is currently undeveloped but has been cleared of significant vegetation It is bordered by lots developed with single family residences and an undeveloped lot. 3.0 Tree Inventory - Methods and Results I conducted visual evaluations of all the trees according to ISA standards and based upon many years conducting such evaluations on trees in the Pacific Northwest. I oberserved trees up close to inspect conditions of the trunk and from afar to inspect conditions in the crowns. All assessments were conducted according to the methods specified in the ISA Tree Risk Assessment Manual (Dunster, Julian A., E. Thomas Smiley, Nelda Matheny, and Sharon Lily. 2013. Tree Risk Assessment Manual. Atta ' PLN2 Packet Pg. 162 The investigations involved the gathering of the following information: • Tree species • Trunk diameter • Crown spread diameter • Location factors • Health and condition notes (general level of vigor, defects, disease or pest problems) There are 4 significant trees on the property and three just off -site with drip lines that extend onto the property. All are shown on the inventory map. All of the information specific to each tree is provided in the accompanying Tree Evaluation Data spreadsheet. In summary, all of the trees are in good to generally good condition and health and no significant defects were noted. 4.0 Limits of Disturbance Discussion and Encroachment The City of Edmonds requires Limits of Disturbance (LOD) be established as minimum distance of protection for all retained trees on site and for those just off -site with driplines that extend onto the property. Limits of development for each tree are provided on the accompanying Tree Evaluation Data spreadsheet. The LODs are set based upon the following criteria: • For trees with higher crowns where development can occur below the crown, the LODs are set a location to protect the structural root plate for below ground features. Above ground features can be within the LOD as no root disturbance will result. • For small trees with low crowns, the LOD is set just beyond the edge of the drip line in order to eliminate impacts to the crown. This distance is also adequate to provide sufficient root protection and prevent significant disturbance. 5.0 Tree Retention, Replacement Required and Protection. The City of Edmonds tree retention, protect and replacement requirements are specified in chapter 23.10 Tree Related Regulations. Tree Retention - The City of Edmonds requires retention of 30% of the significant trees. At 4 significant trees, 2 trees are required to be retained. The project proposes to retain 2 significant trees and removes 2 trees for 50% retention. Atta ' PLN2 Packet Pg. 163 5.1 Tree Replacement The proposed development plan proposes the removal of 2 trees on the property. Replacement of significant trees will be required as follows as required by ECDC 23.10.080 6"-10" One new tree 10.1 "-14" Two new trees >14" Three new trees Replacement for the removal of the 2 significant trees on the property requires 6 replacement trees, or its equivalent in fee in lieu. Replacement trees shall primarily be native species and sized as follows: 0 3 Deciduous trees - 1 1/2" caliper 0 Evergreen trees - 6 feet tall CU N The site plans show the locations of the proposed replacement trees. 0 Replacement Tree Fee in Lieu: A fee in lieu of tree replacement may be allowed, subject to approval by the director after consideration of all other options. A tree replacement fee shall be required for each replacement tree required but not planted on the application site or an off -site location. 1. The amount of the fee shall be $1,000 multiplied by the number of trees necessary to satisfy the tree replacement requirements of this section and shall be deposited into the city's tree fund. 2. The fee shall be paid to the city prior to the issuance of a tree removal permit or associated development permit. 5.2 Tree Protection Measures The following tree protection measures are required by 23.10.070 of the ECDC: Prior to development activity or initiating tree removal on the site, vegetated areas, individual trees and soil to be preserved shall be protected from potentially damaging activities pursuant to the following standards: A. Preconstruction Meeting Required. Prior to the commencement of any permitted clearing and grading activity, a preconstruction meeting shall be held on site with the permittee and appropriate city staff. The project site shall be marked in the field as follows: 1. The extent of clearing and grading to occur; 2. Delineation and protection of any critical areas and critical area buffers with clearing limit fencing; 3. Flagging of trees to be removed and tags on trees to be retained; and 4. Property lines. B. Placing Materials Near Trees. No person may conduct any activity within the protected area of any tree designated to remain, including, but not limited to, operating Atta PLN2 Packet Pg. 164 0 or parking equipment, placing solvents, storing building material or stockpiling any materials, or dumping concrete washout or other chemicals. During construction, no person shall attach any object to any tree designated for protection. C. Protective Barrier. Before development, land clearing, grading, filling or any land alteration, the applicant shall: 1. Erect and maintain readily visible temporary protective tree fencing along the limits of disturbance which completely surrounds the protected area of all retained trees, groups of trees, vegetation and native soil. Tree protective fencing shall be a minimum height of three feet, visible and of durable construction; orange polyethylene laminar fencing is acceptable. 2. Install highly visible signs spaced no further than 15 feet apart along the entirety of the protective tree fencing. Said sign must be approved by the director and shall state, at a minimum, "Tree and Soil Protection Area, Entrance Prohibited," and provide the city phone number for code enforcement to report violations. 3. Prohibit excavation or compaction of soil or other potentially damaging activities within the barriers; provided, that the director may allow such activities approved by a 0 qualified professional and under the supervision of a qualified professional retained and 3 paid for by the applicant. 0 4. Maintain the protective barriers in place for the duration of the project until the director authorizes their removal. y 5. Ensure that any approved landscaping done in the protected zone subsequent to the removal of the barriers shall be accomplished with machinery from outside the protected zone or by hand. 6. In addition to the above, the director may require the following: E a. If equipment is authorized to operate within the protected zone, the soil and criticalCU root zone of a tree must be covered with mulch to a depth of at least six inches or with CU plywood, steel plates or similar material in order to protect roots and soil from damage = caused by heavy equipment. b. Minimize root damage by hand -excavating a two -foot -deep trench, at edge of critical a root zone, to cleanly sever the roots of trees to be retained. Never rip or shred roots with ,W heavy equipment. c. Corrective pruning performed on protected trees in order to avoid damage from Cn machinery or building activity. a d. Maintenance of trees throughout construction period by watering and fertilizing. N D. Grade. N 1. The grade shall not be elevated or reduced within the critical root zone of trees to be � preserved without the director's authorization based on recommendations from a a qualified professional. The director may allow coverage of up to one-half of the area of the tree's critical root zone with light soils (no clay) to the minimum depth necessary to carry out grading or landscaping plans, if it will not imperil the survival of the tree. o Aeration devices may be required to ensure the tree's survival. a 2. If the grade adjacent to a preserved tree is raised such that it could slough or erode into the tree's critical root zone, it shall be permanently stabilized to prevent soil erosion and suffocation of the roots. 3. The applicant shall not install an impervious surface within the critical root zone of any tree to be retained without the authorization of the director. The director may require specific construction methods and/or use of aeration devices to ensure the tree's survival and to minimize the potential for root -induced damage to the impervious surface. 4. To the greatest extent practical, utility trenches shall be located outside of the critical root zone of trees to be retained. The director may require that utilities be tunneled Atta PLN2 Packet Pg. 165 under the roots of trees to be retained if the director determines that trenching would 0 significantly reduce the chances of the tree's survival. 5. Trees and other vegetation to be retained shall be protected from erosion and sedimentation. Clearing operations shall be conducted so as to expose the smallest practical area of soil to erosion for the least possible time. To control erosion, it is encouraged that shrubs, ground cover and stumps be maintained on the individual lots, where feasible. 6. The director may approve the use of alternative tree protection techniques if those techniques provide an equal or greater degree of protection than the techniques listed in this subsection. E. Directional Felling. Directional felling of trees shall be used to avoid damage to trees designated for retention. F. Additional Requirements. The director may require additional tree protection 0 measures that are consistent with accepted urban forestry industry practices. [Ord. 3 4218 § 1 (Att. A), 2021 ]. 0 L 6.0 Impact Assessment y Encroachment is proposed into the drip line setbacks of the two retained trees for the new building to the north of the trees. The distance between the building and the trees is far enough that root damage will be minor. Over -excavation for the foundation within the protection zone of the retained trees is to be limited to no more than 2 feet. Any damaged roots as large as 1/2" are to be hand cut just prior to backfilling at a point beyond the damage where the root bark is not torn or damaged. This will help the roots to heal. Removal of tree #3 is to be done in a way that will lessen the impacts to the roots of trees 1 and 2. Preverably, the stump is to be ground down to below the soil surface. 7.0 Use of This Report This report is provided as a means of addressing the trees on the property of the Linton Short Plat project in the City of Edmonds, WA. This report addresses only trees on this property. There is no gurarantee that retained trees will survive through construction, and as trees are dynamic and their conditions can change rapidly due to environmental changes, Shoffner Consulting cannot be held liable for the failure of any retained trees. Cordially, Tony Shoffner ISA Certified Arborist #PN-0909A TRAQ Atta ' PLN2 Packet Pg. 166 TREE EVALUATION DATA Westerly, LLC - Cascara 9516 Edmonds Way, Edmonds, WA November 11, 2f Tree # Location Species Dbh CSD Rating LOD N LOD S LOD E LOD W Condition Notes Status Replacement 1 On site Western white pine (Pinus monticola) 18" 30' 2 15' N/A N/A N/A Generally good condition and health. No defects. Minor deadwood. To be retained 0 2 On site Western white pine (Pinus monticola) 18" 28' 2 6' N/A N/A N/A Generally good condition and health. No defects. Minor deadwood. To be retained 0 3 On site Western white pine (Pinus monticola) 24" 36' 2 15, N/A N/A N/A Generally good condition and health. No defects. Large and older. To be removed 3 4 On site Silver maple (Acer saccharinum) 16" 44' 1 15' 15' 15' 15' Good condition and health. No defects. To be removed 3 5 Off -site Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) 36" 42' 2 N/A N/A 15' N/A Generally good condition and health. No defects. Large and older. Off -site 0 6 Off -site Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) 24" 40' 2 N/A N/A 15' N/A Generally good condition and health. No defects. Large and older. Off -site 0 7 iOff-site I Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) 20" 34' 2 15' N/A I N/A I N/A lGenerally good condition and health. No defects. Large and older. iOff-site 0 Tree # Tree number as assigned on tag Species Species of tree Dbh Trunk diameter inches at 54" height CSD Crown spread diameter in feet Rating Condition Rating: 1=Very good condition and health. No defects. Young and vigorous. 2=Generally good condition and health. May be minor defects. Older and less vigorous. 3=Fair condition and health. Defects and/or health concerns. Symptoms of stress / decline. 4=Poor condition and health. Major defects and significant health issues. LOD - Specified limits of disturbance based upon tree size, height and crown spread Condition Notes Notes on conditions specific to each tree if specific concerns over health or defects Status Significant status Replacement Number of trees required for replacement if removed. Atta PLN2 Packet Pg. 167 Q Atta PLN2 Packet Pg. 168 To whom it may concern, I am writing to officially provide my consent for the removal of the trees labeled as #5 and #6. These trees are located on our shared property, as indicated in the image below. This consent is in direct response to The City of Edmonds Comment Letter dated July 28, 2023, pertaining to file number PLN2023- 0029, for the property located at 9516 Edmonds Way. After review and consideration of the provided permit documentation, you are granted my explicit authorization to remove these two trees. Should there be any coordination or collaboration required on my part to facilitate execution of the project, please do not hesitate to contact me. Shaun Leiser Registered Agent Edmonds Way, LLC I 20' SEMElVr AGREEMENT (A.F/21/0719 20' .N.G,:4CAVUENT (AF 1910725042 N \\y TRACT x ! (PRMATE R0.) 1 1 1 \\ 1 1 1 SHORT PLAT 11 1200301175007) ) V I f i V Atta ' PLN2 Packet Pg. 169 GENERAL NOTES All rough grading shall be positive, draining away from all structures. All stones larger than 1.5" diameter shall be removed from the growing medium. Topsoil shall be provided in accordance to BMP T5.13 WSDOE Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington. All bed areas to receive 2" of fine ground fir or hemlock bark, composition mulches are not an acceptable alternative. Trees and shrubs are to be planted at a depth 3/4" higher than the level that they were grown in the nursery. Bark mulch is not to be placed above the root crown. All plants shall at least conform to the minimum standard established by the american association of nurserymen. Lawn areas are to be hydroseeded per manufacturer's specifications, OR EQUIVALENT. Remove all stones larger than 1" from lawn areas. Equivalent plant material substitutions may be allowed with prior approval by the Landscape Architect. If the site work is different than shown on the Landscape Plan, or poor soils and debris are discovered, requiring changes to the Landscape Plan, contact the Landscape Architect for instruction. The Landscape Contractor is responsible for maintaining the landscape during installation, until final acceptance by the owner's representative. The Landscape Contractor shall warranty all materials and workmanship for a period of one year, from the time of final acceptance. During the warranty period, the Landscape Contractor will not be responsible for plant death caused by unusual climatic conditions, vandalism, theft, fire, or poor maintenance practices. The Landscape Architect shall have sole authority to determine the cause of death. Planting plan takes precedent when there is a discrepancy between plant quantities in the plant schedule and the plan. TREE PROTECTION All vehicle traffic shall be routed away from significant trees during construction to avoid excessive soil compaction. Where vehicular traffic is required the soil shall be protected with a 10" layer of woodchips and/or plywood placed over the path of the vehicle. The woodchips may be removed when no longer needed. All significant trees to be saved and/or retained shall be protected with a 5' high chainlink or plastic net fencing placed 5' beyond tree driplines during construction. The fencing shall not be removed without the authorization of the consulting arborist or site supervisor. Trenching within tree driplines shall be avoided. Tunneling around primary tree roots is permitted when disturbance within driplines is necessary. Stump pulling of all trees to be removed in the vicinity of significant trees to be retained shall be avoided. Stump grinding is permitted as necessary. It may be necessary to provide supplemental irrigation during dry periods within the construction process, and mulching over the roots of any or all preserved trees. within dripline of tree. See specifications. TREE PROTECTION FENCING NTS 4 NE 1/4, SEC. 36, TWP. 27N. RGE. 3 E., W.M. KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON EX. SSMH '( „�� IX. C.B. i�1 RIM=339.1 / S V` / LE=335.27 (18" SW, 12" NE) / °4: o � a / PEDESTRIAN ACCESS EX WM FROM EDMONDS y'AY �`• c ° EX. SSMH RIM=338 591 A48 - i 5 N IVATE X (PRIVATE R� ✓ �� 1 \ 2 18' SEWER EASEMENT (AF. J198254J - / SHORT PLAT / (A.F. 1200301175007) / 4 i i i FUTURE APARTMENT �y 1 \yam \ DRIVEWAY SHARED WITH WAY AND TWO LOTS TO kM. PIX-4 / SQL • \ �PUD EASEMENT (AF. 17803220241) A TH-3 422 FF=342.0 A a Pi MP d 1-i/2" POLY LINE_(7YP.) a Stitt . d tiP d N 41 i d Fd a° a END°SS a -' F 4 - SF FF 42.00 1`P�V 4 CONCRETE PAD 'j9,i OR GARBAGE/RECYCLE TH�\\ F 404 SF a z ° Y G P 7" WATER-Nl V M ER TAP. TREE TO BE REMOVED, TYP. CLEARING LIMITS LINE SF \ j \ PLINE (TYP.) TREE ROTECTION FENCE, TYP. TREE TO BE PROTECTED, \ TYP. 0 20' 40' NORTH ORIGIN DESIGN GROUP 1031 185TH AVE NE SNOHOMISH, WA 98290 TEL: 425.346.1905 STATE OF WASHINGTON LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT , KRYST OWE LICENCE NO. 1206 KEVI5lON5: # DESCRIPTION DATE 1 CITY COMMENTS 8/22/2023 2 SITE PLAN CHANGES 9/6/2023 o o Q W o 00 0 Cn o 0 �coQM 0 o Q cn ti Q 0 N W Z .. a of W V Cn Lo 0 Q o W a � DRAWING TITLE: LANDSCAPE PLAN APPLICANT: JAKE LYON WESTERLY, LLC 320 DAYTON ST, STE 101 EDMONDS, WA 98020 JAKE@WESTERLYRE.COM DRAWING INrOKMATION ODG PROJECT #: 23-472 DRAWN BY: KL CHECKED BY: KL DATE.: AP R I L 28, 2023 511EET NO: L = 1 OF 5 N 0 t C 3 0 L :.i N U c s cu M V 0 d v! M N 0 O M N CD z J a C s Q Anammem t PLN2023-0 Packet Pg. 170 TREE DETENTION ECDC 23.10.060.0 25% of all significant trees in the developable site shall be retained. There are 4 trees on -site. 2 trees shall be removed and replaced at a 3:1 ratio. There are 3 trees off -site. 2 trees shall be removed. 1 tree shall be removed and replaced at a 3:1 ratio. For the significant tree greater than 24' in DBH removed, a fee based on an appraisal of the tree value by the city tree protection professional using trunk formula method in the current edition of the Guide for Plant Appraisal shall be required. TREE REPLACEMENT ECDC 23.10.080 A. Replacement Required. Tree replacement is required for tree cutting permits required by this chapter and/or for tree removal associated with the development types identified in ECDC 23.10.060(A). Each significant tree to be removed shall be replaced as follows: 1. For each significant tree between six inches and 10 inches DBH removed, one replacement tree is required. 2. For each significant tree between 10.1 inches and 14 inches in DBH removed, two replacement trees are required. 3. For each significant tree greater than 14 inches and less the 24 inches in DBH removed, three replacement trees are required. B. No tree replacement is required in the following cases: 1. The tree is hazardous, dead, diseased, injured, or in a declining condition with no reasonable assurance of regaining vigor, for reasons not attributable to the development. D. Replacement Specifications. 1. Minimum sizes for replacement trees shall be: a. One -and -one -half -inch caliper for deciduous trees; b. Six feet in height for evergreen trees. 2. The director may consider smaller -sized replacement trees if the applicant can demonstrate that smaller trees are more suited to the species, the site conditions, and the purposes of this section, and that such trees will be planted in sufficient quantities to meet the intent of this section. 3. Replacement trees shall be primarily native species. 4. Replacement trees must be planted within the city of Edmonds or its urban growth area. Trees 3 & 4 to be removed. #3 = Western White Pine = 18" DBH = 3 replacement trees required #4 = Silver Maple = 16" DBH = 3 replacement trees required #5 = Douglas Fir = 36" DBH = A fee based on an appraisal of the tree value by the city tree protection professional using trunk formula method in the current edition of the Guide for Plant Appraisal shall be required. #6 - Douglas Fir = 24" DBH = 3 replacement trees required 9 replacement trees required 9 replacement trees proposed 9 replacement trees have been provided. Some native or ornamental varieties of native species have been provided, with the remainder being ornamental species appropriate for the density of the site. See Arborist report provided by Shoffner Consulting for additional information. TREE INVENTORY NE 1/4, SEC. 36, TWP. 27N. RGE. 3 E., W.M. PLANT SCHEDULE KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON DECIDUOUS TREES QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE CONTAINER SPACING 4 Acer circinatum Vine Maple 8' Ht. B&B SPACING AS SHOWN ® 1 Acer palmatum 'Tsukasa Silhouette' Tsukasa Silhouette Japanese Maple 1.5" Cal. B&B SPACING AS SHOWN 1 Amelanchier x grandiflora Autumn Brilliance' Autumn Brilliance Apple Serviceberry 1.5" Cal. B&B SPACING AS SHOWN EVERGREEN TREES QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE CONTAINER SPACING 2 Cupressus nootkatensis ' Pendula' Weeping Nootka Cypress 6' MIN. HT. B&B SPACING AS SHOWN 1 Pinus contorta Shore Pine 6' MIN. HT. B&B 20' O.C. 2 Thuja plicata'Excelsa' Excelsa Western Red Cedar 6' Ht. B&B SPACING AS SHOWN 4 Thuja x 'Junior Giant' Junior Giant Thuja 6' MIN. HT. B&B 20' O.C. y+Mnn� STREET TREES QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE CONTAINER SPACING 2 Prunus serrulata'Amanogawa' Japanese Flowering Cherry 2" Cal. B&B tz) TYPE II LANDSCAPE COMPLIANCE For calculations purposes only. Evergreen and deciduous trees, with no more than 30 percent being deciduous, a minimum of six feet in height, and planted at intervals no greater than 20 feet on center. DECIDUOUS TREES Botanical Common Quantity Acer circinatum Vine Maple 2 25% 2 EVERGREEN TREES Botanical Common Quantity Pinus contorta Shore Pine 1 Thuja plicata'Excelsa' Excelsa Western Red Cedar 2 Thuja x 'Junior Giant' Junior Giant Thuja 3 75% 6 Total Trees 8 Tree # Location Species DBH CSD Rating LOD N LOD S LOD E LOD W Condition Notes Status Replacement 1 On Site Western white pine (Pinus monticola) 18" 30' 2 15' N/A N/A N/A Generally good condition and health. No defects. Minordeadwood. To be retained 0 2 On Site Western white pine (Pinus monticola) 18" 28' 2 6' N/A N/A N/A Generally good condition and health. No defects. Minor deadwood. To be retained 0 3 On Site Western white pine (Pinus monticola) 24" 36' 2 15' N/A N/A N/A Generally good condition and health. No defects. Large and older. To be removed 3 4 On Site Silver maple (Acersaccharinum) 16" 44' 1 15' 15' 15' 15' Good condition and health. No defects. To be removed 3 5 Off Site Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) 36" 42' 2 N/A N/A 15' N/A Generally good condition and health. No defects. Large and older. To be removed Fee in lieu 6 Off Site Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) 24" 1 40' 1 2 N/A N/A 1 15' N/A lGenerally good condition and health. No defects. Large and older. To be removed 3 7 Off Site Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) 20" 1 34' 1 2 1 15' N/A I N/A N/A IGenerally good condition and health. No defects. Large and older. Off site 0 Rating Condition Rating: 1=Very good condition and health. No defects. Young and vigorous 2 = Generally good condition and health. Maybe minor defects. Older and less vigorous. 3 = Fair condition and health. Defects and/or health concerns. Symptoms of stress / decline. 4 = Poor condition and health. Major defects and significant health issues. TYPE III LANDSCAPE COMPLIANCE PLANT SCHEDULE SHRUBS QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE CONTAINER 11 Berberis thunbergii Crimson Pygmy' Crimson Pygmy Japanese Barberry 18" HT Pot 7 Calamagrostis x acutiflora'Karl Foerster' Karl Foerster Feather Reed Grass 18" HT Pot Q 21 Euonymus japonicus 'Aureo-marginatus' Golden Euonymus 18" HT Pot ® 4 Hydrangea paniculata ' Dvp Pinky' TM Pinky Winky Panicled Hydrangea 18" HT Pot {� 20 Nandina domestica Gulf Stream' TM Gulf Stream Heavenly Bamboo 18" HT Pot �E 33 Pennisetum alopecuroides 'Hameln' Hameln Fountain Grass 18" HT Pot O3 Symphoricarpos albus Common White Snowberry 18" HT Pot Q18 Vaccinium ovatum 'Native Star' Native Star Evergreen Huckleberry 18" HT Pot GROUND COVERS QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE CONTAINER 426 Arctostaphylos uva-ursi Kinnikinnick 4" Pot TYPE IV LANDSCAPE COMPLIANCE For calculations purposes only. Evergreen and deciduous trees, with no more than 50 percent being deciduous, a minimum of six feet in height, and planted at intervals no greater than 30 feet on center. DECIDUOUS TREES Botanical Common Quantity Acer circinatum Vine Maple 2 40% 2 EVERGREEN TREES Botanical Common Quantity Cupressus nootkatensis 'Pendula' Weeping Nootka Cypress 2 Thuja x 'Junior Giant' Junior Giant Thuja 1 60% 3 Total Trees 5 .N For calculations purposes only. 1. Trees shall be deciduous and planted 25 feet on center and the trunk shall be free of branches below six feet in height. 2. Plant materials which will cover the ground within three years, and which will not exceed three and one-half feet in height. DECIDUOUS TREES Botanical Common Quantity Acer palmatum'Tsukasa Silhouette' Tsukasa Silhouette Japanese Maple 1 Amelanchier x grandiflora 'Autumn Brilliance' Autumn Brilliance Apple Serviceberry 1 SHRUBS Botanical Common Quantity Berberisthunbergii'Crimson Pygmy' Crimson PygmyJapanese Barberry 9 Calamagrostis x acutiflora'Karl Foerster' Karl Foerster Feather Reed Grass 5 Euonymusjaponicus 'Aureo-marginatus' Golden Euonymus 6 Pennisetum alopecuroides 'Hameln' Hameln Fountain Grass 1 GROUND COVERS Botanical Common Quantity Arctostaphylos uva-ursi Kinnikinnick 64 —TYPE III LANDSCAPING NORTH TYPE II LANDSCAPING LANDSCAPING 20' 40' ORIGIN DESIGN GROUP 1031 185TH AVE NE SNOHOMISH, WA 98290 TEL: 425.346.1905 STATE OF WASHINGTON LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT KRYSTAL LOWE LICENCE NO. 1206 KEVI5ION5: # DESCRIPTION DATE 1 CITY COMMENTS 8/22/2023 2 SITE PLAN CHANGES 9/6/2023 o Q W o 00 0 Cn o 0 �coQM O o Q cn ti Q 0 N W Z -- a of W Lo 0 Q o W a � DRAWING TITS: LANDSCAPE PLAN APPLICANT: JAKE LYON WESTERLY, LLC 320 DAYTON ST, STE 101 EDMONDS, WA 98020 JAKE@WESTERLYRE.COM DRAWING INI=OKMATION ODG PROJECT #: 23-472 DRAWN BY: KL CHECKED BY: KL DATE: AP R I L 28, 2023 5L1EET NO: L=2 OF 5 Attacriment PLN2023-0 Packet Pg. 171 PLANTING AT TURF AREAS. KEEP TURF CLEAR FOR A 18" RADIUS CIRCLE AROUND THE TREE. MULCH WITH A 3" THICK LAYER OF SHREDDED BARK. RECESS TURF AREA 1" TO ALLOW FOR MULCH. FINISHED GRADE AT LAWN. J xo xo C, I I I + Cad m m m J O t & �p - J Q �NM m 0 QQQ Q 0 0 of L4 N cc O NNN I) PLANT PIT DETAIL SET ROOTBALL CROWN 1 1 /2" HIGHER THAN THE SURROUNDING FINISHED \ / GRADE. SLOPE BACKFILL AWAY FROM \Vll//J ROOTBALL FOR POSITIVE DRAINAGE. DOUBLE STAKE WITH WIRE: PLANTING AT - #12 GALVANIZED WIRE THROUGH SHRUB AREAS. "' THE EYE OF "CINCH —TIE" RUBBER SUPPORT. KEEP MULCH 6" — 8" FROM BASE OF TREE. w 2" DIAMETER LODGEPOLE PINE MULCH WATER WELL w TREATED TREE STAKES. SET PERPENDICULAR TO PREVAILING AREA TO 3" DEPTH. J WIND. 6" HIGH WATER 0 xo WELL AT SHRUB 0 m REMOVE NURSERY STAKE BY THE AREAS. END OF MAINTENANCE. Q FINISHED GRADE Q 1 X3 CROSSTIE, AVOID RUBBING AT SHRUBS. INJURY TO TRUNK. IIIIII `� II III III IIII� ROOTBALL 1 ROOT III —III- -III III_ BALL z BACKFILL PLANTING AS PER PLANTING DETAIL. AVOID DAMAGE TO THE ROOT 2X ROOTBALL BALL WITH THE SUPPORT STAKES. 32" AT 15 GALLON NATIVE SOIL MIX 16" 48" AT 24" BOX FIRMLY COMPACTED. 60" AT 30" BOX 72" AT 36" BOX STAKING DETAIL TREE DOUBLE STAKE PLANTING 1" = 1'-0" F C U U U a r T FX-PL-FX-TREE-11 IIJ Shrub. 4" layer of mulch. No more more than 1" of mulch on top of GE WIRE W/ VINYL root ball. (See 'I \ITS PER specifications for mulch). Finished grade. I "� :: •::•:•:FLAG WIRES Modified soil. Depth varies. FINISH GRADE OF MULCH TREE GUY STAKE Root ball rests on existing or recompacted soil. SECTION VIEW S OCCUR IN Notes: IDE & DIA MULCH 1- Shrubs shall be of quality prescribed in the root observations detail and specifications. 2- See specifications for further requirements related to this detail. CONIFER TREE PLANTING & GUYING 3 SHRUB - MODIFIED SOIL 1/2" = V-0" 3/4" = 1'-0" GENERAL DESIGN STANDARDS ECDC 20.13.020.N Trees and very large shrubs should be planted at least five feet from any water/sewer lines. Landscape plantings shall reflect consideration of plantings in relation to utility lines. EDMONDS STREETSCAPE PLAN TREE PLANTING PROCEDURES GUIDELINES FOR STREET TREE LOCATION, SPACING AND CLEARANCES ARE DEFINED BELOW: Maintain the following minimum clearances: 5 feet from underground utilities unless adequate protection is provided for the tree and the utility line as approved by the City. Call 1-800-424-5555 to request location of underground utilities, 10 feet from power poles, 7-1/2 feet from driveways, 20 feet from street lights, 20 feet from other existing trees, 30 feet from street intersections except at intersections with special design treatment and/or as approved by the City. SEE NOTE 4 NOTES: 1. ALL ROOT PRUNING SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE STANDARDS OF ANSI A300. 2. ALL ROOTS OVER 1" IN DIAMETER THAT HAVE BEEN EXPOSED AND DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES SHALL BE REMOVED. MAKE A CLEAN, STRAIGHT CUT TO REMOVE ENTIRE DAMAGED PORTION OF ROOT. 3. ALL EXPOSED ROOTS SHALL BE TEMPORARILY COVERED WITH DAMP BURLAP TO PREVENT DRYING AND DAMAGE. 4. ROOT BARRIER SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 18" DEEP AND SHALL BE MADE OF BIO—BARRIER TRIFLURALIN, AS ROOT CONTROL CHEMICAL OR APPROVED EQUAL. SET 1/2" BELOW FINISHED GRADE. CENTER ROOT BARRIER ON TRUNK OF TREE. 5. DISTANCE BETWEEN TREE AND ROOT BARRIER TO BE DETERMINED BY ARBORIST. MINIMUM DISTANCE IS 3 TIMES THE TRUNK CALIPER. GAP BETWEEN ROOTS AND ROOT BARRIER ALSO TO BE DETERMINED BY ARBORIST. `S f . 189" Root ball. 4" high x 8" wide round - topped soil berm above root ball surface shall be constructed around the root ball. Berm shall begin at root ball periphery. Prior to mulching, lightly tamp soil around the root ball in 6" lifts to brace shrub. Do not over compact. When the planting hole has been backfilled our p g ,p water around the root ball to settle the soil. — Existing soil. URBAN TREE FOUNDATION © 2014 OPEN SOURCE FREE TO USE FX-PL-FX-SHRB-03 ION DATE CITY OF EDMONDS ROOT BARRIER FOR [JIANUARY 2018 CONCRETE/PAVED PUBLIC WORKS WALKWAY STANDARD DEPARTMENT DETAIL APPROVED BY: R. ENGLISH T R- 5 5 0 - 3" thick layer of ulch. nished grade. Modified soil. Depth varies. Existing soil. Groundcover plants to be triangularly spaced. 9 Y p Mulch. Pavement. PLAN Notes: 1- See planting legend for groundcover specie 2- Small roots (Y," or less) that grow around, u,_ , considered a normal condition in container production and are acceptable however they should be eliminated at the time of planting. Roots on the periphery can be removed at the time of planting. 3- Settle soil around root ball of each groundcover prior to mulching. 4 GROUNDCOVER \ 3/4" = V-0" ORIGIN DESIGN GROUP 1031 185TH AVE NE SNOHOMISH, WA 98290 TEL: 425.346.1905 STATE OF WASHINGTON LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT E KRYST.4L LOWE LICENCE NO. 1206 KEVI510N5: # DESCRIPTION DATE 1 CITY COMMENTS 8/22/2023 2 SITE PLAN CHANGES 9/6/2023 N N 7 0 s c 0 M 0 o Q W o oo 0 Cn o 0 �coQM O .. o Q 5; cn ti Q in N W z .. a of W C� t� c p Q o W a � DKAWING TITS: LANDSCAPE PLAN APPLICANT: JAKE LYON WESTERLY, LLC 320 DAYTON ST, STE 101 EDMONDS, WA 98020 JAKE@WESTERLYRE.COM DKAWING INI=OKMATION ODG PROJECT #: 23-472 DRAWN BY: KL CHECKED BY: KL DATE: AP R I L 28, 2023 511EET NO: L=3 OF 5 /miammem t PLN2023-0 Packet Pg. 172 IRRIGATION NOTES All city standards shall be followed. Plan is diagrammatic and conceptual in nature. Standard trade practices shall be employed to insure economy of trenching and sleeving. Exact location of lines and heads may be altered by contractor to provide best water coverage. Manufacturer's recommended head spacing shall be exceeded only with permission of landscape architect. Adjust sprinkler arc and radius as needed to avoid over spray onto hard surfaces, while maintaining coverage. Irrigation trench depths, 18" for mainline, 12" for lateral lines. trenches shall be free of all debris that can result in damage to the piping. Set valve boxes square to adjacent buildings, walks or parking. Owner to provide deduct/exempt meter as required by water purveyor. Leave a minimum of 3' of additional control wire looped at each valve box. Attach control wires to the adjacent piping with electrical tape, at least every 2'. Run 3 spare wires along entire length of mainline, loop through each valve box to farthest valve box each direction. For irrigation lines located in the right-of-way, the property owner will be responsible for maintaining and locating all irrigation lines. Controller locations may be adjusted . Flow and static pressure was not provided. Design assumption of 75 GPM and 70 PSI static pressure at the meter. Verify in field. IRRIGATION SCHEDULE SYMBOL MANUFACTURER/MODEL/DESCRIPTION ® e (1k 4 (mi 4 Hunter PROS-00-PRS30 short radius nozzles 20 2H 40 4H 6Q 6H Shrub Spray, Fixed Riser. 30 psi regulated Shrub Adapter. Co -molded wiper seal with UV Resistant Material. ( Hunter PROS-00-PRS30 5' radius Q H F Shrub Spray, Fixed Riser. 30 psi regulated Shrub Adapter. Co -molded wiper seal with UV Resistant Material. 0 cl" C� 0 Hunter PROS-00-PRS30 8' radius Q T H F Shrub Spray, Fixed Riser. 30 psi regulated Shrub Adapter. Co -molded wiper seal with UV Resistant Material. 10 0 0 o Hunter PROS-00-PRS30 10' radius Q T H F Shrub Spray, Fixed Riser. 30 psi regulated Shrub Adapter. Co -molded wiper seal with UV Resistant Material. ® © ® 0 O 12 15 1� O O O Hunter PROS-00-PRS30 Adjustable Arc Shrub Spray, Fixed Riser. 30 psi regulated Shrub Adapter. Co -molded wiper seal with UV Resistant Material. SYMBOL MANUFACTURER/MODEL/DESCRIPTION QTY PSI 34 30 22 30 26 30 26 30 2 QTY Hunter ICV-G 1" 1 ", 1-1 /2", 2", and 3" Plastic Electric Remote Control Valves, Globe 3 Configuration, with NPT Threaded Inlet/Outlet, for Commercial/Municipal Use. BF Zurn 950XL 1" 1 Double Check Valve Assembly Hunter PHC-1200 C Wi-Fi enabled, full -functioning controller with touchscreen, 1 12-Station fixed controller, 120 VAC, Outdoor model. ® Hunter RFC 1 Rain and freeze sensor, with conduit installation, mount as noted. Normally closed switch. M FLi Point of Connection 1 Irrigation Lateral Line: PVC Schedule 40 1/2" 541.1 I.f. Irrigation Lateral Line: PVC Schedule 40 3/4" 71.6 I.f. Irrigation Lateral Line: PVC Schedule 40 1" 76.5 I.f. Irrigation Lateral Line: PVC Schedule 40 1 1/4" 77.8 I.f. Irrigation Mainline: PVC Schedule 40 1 1/4" 207.6 I.f. -------- Pipe Sleeve: PVC Class 200 SDR 21 42.6 I.f. Valve Callout a# Valve Number #" # Valve Flow Valve Size VALVE SCHEDULE 30 NUMBER MODEL SIZE TYPE GPM WIRE PSI PSI @ POC 1 Hunter ICV-G 1" Shrub Spray 18.07 22.6 36.4 42.1 2 Hunter ICV-G 1" Shrub Spray 19.08 118.3 36.1 44.2 3 Hunter ICV-G 1'I Shrub Spray 13.25 218.1 36.2 44.3 Common Wire 207.6 DETAIL 5/5 5/5 5/5 5/5 5/5 DETAIL 4/5 1/5 3/5 1.63 in/h 1.55 in/h 1.59 in/h NE 1/4, SEC. 36, TWP. 27N. RGE. 3 E., W.M. KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON FA 0 20' 40' NORTH ORIGIN DESIGN GROUP 1031 185TH AVE NE SNOHOMISH, WA 98290 TEL: 425.346.1905 STATE OF WASHINGTON LICENSED LANDSCAPE, ARCHITECT E KRYSTAL LOWE LICENCE NO. 1206 KEVI510N5: # DESCRIPTION DATE 1 CITY COMMENTS 8/22/2023 2 SITE PLAN CHANGES 9/6/2023 o Q W o 0 0 r Cn o 0 �coQM O o Q cn ti Q 0 N W Z .. a of W Lo Q Q o W a � DKAWING TITS: IRRIGATION PLAN APPLICANT: JAKE LYON WESTERLY, LLC 320 DAYTON ST, STE 101 EDMONDS, WA 98020 JAKE@WESTERLYRE.COM DKAWING INrOKMATION ODG PROJECT #: 23-472 DRAWN BY: KL CHECKED BY: KL DATE: AP R I L 28, 2023 5L1EET NO: L=4 OF 5 /miammem t PLN2023-0 Packet Pg. 173 a� N 3 O s C 3 O F- L m ci U N r.+ C d E t V m C R O Q (D L Co 0) N O O M N O N Z J a r c m E z R a PLN2023-0 Packet Pg. 174 R T REPUBLIC 21325-66th Avenue West Lynnwood, WA 98036-7327 SERVICES o 425.646.2400 f 425.778.1148 republicservices.com 19 City of Edmonds Regarding: 9516 Edmonds Way, Edmonds, WA 98020 — Cascara y 0 Hello, F- 0 L We completed a conference call this morning with Brian Kalab from y Insight Engineering and we have agreed on an enclosure location at the end and in between units 3 and 6 which is squared off in a red box on page #2. Approved. Thank You, Courtney Crouch Operations Manager Snohomish County o ��v/tea y GG I Packet Pg. 175 1 .w.r.. GIAr.nw.A. 17IMMAKRATM"Z NE /N, SEC. 36, TW 27N. ROE. 3 E., W.M. RING COUNTY: WASNLVOM ik P t - ou /l� SCALE: i-_ IQ CASCARA MIIM (TNTA(TLJ3T moca ..00 IW mom. sww. sAu annc r.n .mr . c.a Dean .rR »m mm v lnow w .Am. I4Y !»-rr• wm1 a.rc A.>. wm � aA.. oaun !mn w trul I4s1 I»-.sw aal+c somr mrrr Pup 1V4 ra• R (AM A 4O-I.N. (.IJ/ YiN 4f MT fai nln. �M.F P�WMI RIIpV IVY ASI-rl» (am mn w-ar !.r svwrAo✓ mross 4Ar ps.sn rt �mu�mw �nasn f�i nr ��IW m-Nr1 rom a.lsss snow mnn (W ul->,m ivurAlnac w< saAm m 4». rrr r (.0 w .m LEGEND AA s Nwa•wiw �r•�VI✓/�+O O. r s m o —us—w ��FvO 0 I wetl�ota ARP.I! eRruno�H sow.. = mrU- l911U • N/l.CA1T rw w 17 lH�V /yy-p/)/rIs w �• aw l.. w.s II�RIIf t1.M1.ptlM M. err IMAt w-- �1u4A ii.,o�AC P1\ CASCARA R7 PLAN $! Atta Packet Pg. 176 CITY OF EDMONDS 121 5th Avenue North, Edmonds WA 98020 Phone: 425.771.0220 • Fax: 425.771.0221 • Web: www.edmondswa.gov DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT • PLANNING DIVISION •12C. 1 891J June 20, 2023 d/Arch LLC Attn: Matt Driscoll mattdgdarchllc.com Subject: Letter of Completeness Cascara Townhomes Design Review Application PLN2023-0029 Dear Mr. Driscoll, The City of Edmonds has reviewed the design review application for the proposed 6-unit Cascara townhomes located at 9516 Edmonds Way. for completeness pursuant to Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) 20.02.002. The City has determined that the application meets the procedural submission requirements and therefore has been determined complete. Please accept this letter as the City's notice to applicant of determination of completeness on June 13, 2023 pursuant to ECDC 20.02.003. Although it has been determined that the application meets the procedural submission requirements and is therefore complete, additional information may be needed as staff continues with review of the application. Staff will contact you as our review continues if additional information is necessary. Since the application has been determined to be procedurally complete, a notice of application will be posted on the subject property and mailed to adjacent property owners within the next two weeks consistent with ECDC 20.03.002. I will be the main staff contact for your application. If you have questions at any point during the review process, you may reach me at michele.szafran(aedmondswa.gov or (425) 771-0220 Sincerely, Development Services Department - Planning Division Michele Q. Szafran Planner U Atta ' PLN2 Packet Pg. 177 0V EDM CITY OF EDMONDS NOTICE OF APPLICATION & COMMENT PERIOD PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is proposing to construct two buildings each with three units for a total of a 6-unit townhome development with associated garage parking for two vehicles. Each building is proposed to be three stories with two bedrooms. Access to the proposed development will be taken off Edmonds Way via a shared driveway. Design review projects which trigger SEPA are Type III -A decisions. The site is located within the RM-EW zone (One dwelling unit per 1,500 square feet of lot area). PROJECT LOCATION: 9516 — Edmonds Way, Edmonds, WA. Tax Parcel Number 27033600100900 NAME OF APPLICANT: Matt Driscoll (d/Arch LLC) 1 I \ \ , 1041111112-J DATE OF APPLICATION: May 16, 2023 DATE OF COMPLETENESS: June 13, 2023 DATE OF PUBLIC NOTICE: June 23, 2023 REQUESTED PERMIT: Design Review with SEPA. Notice of Public Hearing will be provided once a date has been scheduled. OTHER REQUIRED PERMITS: Building Permits EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS: Preliminary Stormwater Report COMMENTS ON PROPOSAL DUE: July 7, 2023 Any person has the right to comment on this application during public comment period, receive notice and participate in any hearings, and request a copy of the decision on the application. The city may accept public comments at any time prior to the closing of the record of an open record predecision hearing, if any, or, if no open record predecision hearing is provided, prior to the decision on the project permit. Only parties of record as defined in ECDC 20.06.020 have standing to initiate an administrative appeal. Information on this development application can be obtained online at httDS://www.edmondswa.Rov/services/aublic involvement/aublic notices/development notic es under the development notice for application number PLN2023-0029, by emailing the City contact listed below, or by calling the City of Edmonds at 425-771-0220. Please refer to the application number for all inquiries. CITY CONTACT: Michele Q. Szafran, Planner /425-771-0220/ Michele.Szafran@edmondswa.gov Atta PLN2 Packet Pg. 178 a 14__- City of Edmonds ZONING & VICINITY MAP Legend ReZones PRD RoW Zoning . RS-6 RS-8 RS-10 RS-12 © RSW-12 RS-20 RS-MP RM-3 ■ RM-2.4 ■ RM-1.5 RM-EW 13131 BD2 BD3 13134 BD5 OR WMU ® BP BN ® FVMU BC Notes 0 106.21 212.4 Feet 158.2 This ma is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is for �,898 p� B p pp B reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accurate, WGS_1984_Web-Mercator _Auxiliary -Sphere current, or otherwise reliable. © City of Edmonds THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION y d N 7 0 0 H L to v M M U I Packet Pg. 179 1 MOORE GARY & SHARRY LINDENSTEIN EDMUND H &JENNIFER L ADAMS COLIN M/ALEXANDRA 424 LAKEVIEW RD 22808 96TH PL W 22806 96TH PL W LYNNWOOD, WA 98087-2140 EDMONDS, WA 98026 EDMONDS, WA 98020 ROSS, RACHEL S/BRAID LEY T WZL ENTERPRISES LLC PUBLIC UTILITY DIST 1 SNO CO 22804 96TH PL W 2800 WESTERN AVENUE APT 112 2320 CALIFORNIA EDMONDS, WA 98020 SEATTLE, WA 98121 EVERETT, WA 98201 FARMER DANIEL T\GASIMOVA DUNYA CASCARA LLC CALDERA GUILLERMO 437 NE 72ND ST APT 321 320 DAYTON ST STE 101 9512 EDMONDS WY SEATTLE, WA 98115 EDMONDS, WA 98020 EDMONDS, WA 98020 0 y 0 0 GETACHEW DESTA/SOLOMON GENET COMMERS TESSA\SARTHYJAY DOYLE TIMOTHY P/MCCLOSKEY MAR' 20204 37TH AVE W 9504 231ST PL SW 9529 231ST PL SW LYNNWOOD, WA 98036 EDMONDS, WA 98020 EDMONDS, WA 98020 y 0 U N HARDIN WILLIAM C KORN JOSEPH/MELISSA DUBBELAAR DIRK 9511 EDMONDS WAY 9524 EDMONDS WAY 9520 EDMONDS WAY t EDMONDS, WA 98020 EDMONDS, WA 98020 EDMONDS, WA 98020-5936 r r cu DANBERG JENNIFER M/DANBERG SANCHEZ GEORGE ANDREW & EDMONDS WAY LLC KEVIN KISSKEYS-SANCHEZ PO BOX 60216 0 C 9515 231ST PL SW 9521 231ST PL SW SHORELINE, WA 98160 EDMONDS, WA 98020 EDMONDS, WA 98020-5022 cn N LINNANE SCOTT G & RONNE M & THE CASCADIAN IN EDMONDS LLC LONG JEFFREY J o SHARON K 901 WESTMINSTER CIRCLE 4826 45TH AVE SW N 23006 94TH PL W EVERETT, WA 98201 SEATTLE, WA 98116 0 z EDMONDS, WA 98020-5004 J a HUGHES PATRICIA A & VAN NOORT FAIRWAY APARTMENTS LLC PETER H PO BOX 713 23001 97TH AVE W MERCER ISLAND, WA 98040 EDMONDS, WA 98020 Atta ' PLN2 Packet Pg. 180 Everett Daily Herald Affidavit of Publication State of Washington } County of Snohomish } ss Michael Gates being first duly sworn, upon oath deposes and says: that he/she is the legal representative of the Everett Daily Herald a daily newspaper. The said newspaper is a legal newspaper by order of the superior court in the county in which it is published and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of the first publication of the Notice hereinafter referred to, published in the English language continually as a daily newspaper in Snohomish County, Washington and is and always has been printed in whole or part in the Everett Daily Herald and is of general circulation in said County, and is a legal newspaper, in accordance with the Chapter 99 of the Laws of 1921, as amended by Chapter 213, Laws of 1941, and approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of Snohomish County, State of Washington, by order dated June 16, 1941, and that the annexed is a true copy of EDH979259 MATT DRISCOLL/ARCH as it was published in the regular and entire issue of said paper and not as a supplement form thereof for a period of issue(s), such publication commencing on 06/23/2023 and ending on 06/23/2023 and that said newspaper was regularly distributed to its subscribers dining all of said period. The amount o the fee for sl. h publication is $72.24. Subscribed and sworn fore me on this T.L. day of No iy Public in and for the State of Washington. Cay or Edmonds Dcvclopmcm S—.-186031703 MIC'HELE SZAFRAN u Linda Phillips Notary Public State of Washington My Appointment Expires 1229/2025 Commission Number 4417 Atta PLN2 Packet Pg. 181 Classified Proof CITY OF EDMONDS NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND COMMENT PERIOD PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is proposing to construct two buildings each with three units for a total of a 6-unit townhome development with associated garage parking for two vehicles. Each building is proposed to be three stories with two bedrooms. Access to the proposed development will be taken off Edmonds Way via a shared driveway- Design review projects which tri ger SEPA are Type III -A decisions. The site is located within the RM EW zone (One dwelling unit per 1.500 square feet or lot area). N PROJECT LOCATION: 9516- Edmonds Way, Edmonds, WA, d Tax Pa rce I Number 27033600100900 to NAME OF APPLICANT: Matt Driscoll (d/Arch LLC) 3 FILE NUMBER- PLN2023-0029 Q DATE OF APPLICATION: May 16. 2023 S DATE OF COMPLETENESS. June 13, 2023 = DATE OF PUBLIC NOTICE: June 23, 2023 REQUESTED PERMIT: Design Review with SEPA. Notice of been O Public Hearing will be provided once a dale has scheduled. OTHER REQUIRED PERMITS: Building Permits EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS: Preliminary Stommvaler Report L COMMENTS ON PROPOSAL DUE. July 7, 2023 tQ Any person has the right to comment on this application during ti public comment period, receive notice and participate in any fn hearings, and request a copy of the decision on the application. The city may accept public comments at any time prior to the U closing of the record of an open record predecision hearing, if any, or, if no open record predecision hearing is provided, prior to the decision on the project permit. Only parties of record as defined in to EC DC 20.06.020 have standing to initiate an administrative appeal ++ Information on this development application can be obtained online = at N https //www-edmondswa.gov/services/public_involvement/public_n otices/development_ notices i under the development notice for application number PLN2023- V 0029, by emailing the City contact listed below, or by calling the City o1 Edmonds at 425-771-0220. Please refer to the application w+ number for all inquiries. CITY CONTACT: Michele Q. Szafran, Planner /425-771-0220 Michale.Szafran@edmondswa.gov -a Published: June 23, 2023. EDH979259 = O Q N L N CD CD M N CD N Z J a m E s rJ M Q Proofed by Phillips, Linda, 06/28/2023 10:49:32 am Page: 2 Atta Pa I_N2 cket Pg. 182 From: Szafran, Michele To: Genet Solomon Cc: Desta Getachew Subject: RE: PLN2023-0029 - Notice of Application & Comment Period Date: Tuesday, July 11, 2023 4:06:05 PM Attachments: image001.Dna imaQe002.pnnQ Greetings, I have received your email regarding the subject Notice of Application. I will include your comments and information in the staff report as a party of record unless you request not to be included. Your property is highlighted in blue in the city GIS webmap as shown below, the access for the proposed project will be located on the south side of 9516 (between 9530 and 9516). Below is a screenshot of the proposed site plan which is also available on the city website by clicking here and looking for PLN2023-0029 then clicking into the Application Material. Your existing gravel access is depicted on the north side of the clearing limits for the subject property. Attac PLN2 Packet Pg. 183 CLEARING LIMITS LIN TREE PROTECTION FENCE. TYP. TREE TO BE �- TREE TO BE REMOVED, PROTECTED, TYP. TYP. \— \ Regards, Michele Q. Szafran I Associate Planner Planning & Development Department City of Edmonds, WA 121 5th Ave. N. Edmonds, WA 98020 1 Phone: 425-771-0220, ext. 1778 The Planning & Development Department is open M-F 8:000m to 4:30pm for Telephone and Digital/Remote access including Zoom meetings. In -Person walk-in service is currently available Monday thru Fridoy from 10:00om-2:00gm. Helpful Info: Web Map: Click Here / Informational Handouts click Here NOTICE OF DISCLOSURE: According to the Public Records Act, Chapter 42.56 RCW, any and all comments and supporting materials received by the City of Edmonds are public records subject to disclosure. Even if the information contains personal information (name, email address and phone number etc.), the City is obligated to disclose public records upon request. In addition, the City of Edmonds will include comments and supporting materials in permit decision records and Attac PLN2 Packet Pg. 184 may post the information onto its website. From: Genet Solomon <genetsol@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, July 3, 2023 1:05 PM To: Szafran, Michele <Michele.Szafran@edmondswa.gov> Cc: Desta Getachew <destag@gmail.com> Subject: PLN2023-0029 - Notice of Application & Comment Period Michele, We received a notice regarding the above referenced development. We are the owners of the adjacent property located at 9510 Edmonds Way, Edmonds WA 98020. We would like to know how 0 our property will be impacted as a result of the development. Mainly the driveway that is part of our property. s 3 1 appreciate any information you can provide. 0 M L (i Regards. Genet & Desta v Genet Solomon Cell: (206) 579-0379 Office: (425) 775-8525 Fax: (425) 670-3550 Email: aenet.solomonacentury21.com CENTURY 21 Real Estate Center 19020 33rd Ave W Suite 300 Lynnwood, WA 98036 Attac PLN2 Packet Pg. 185 4 of EDP G� zr > s CITY OF EDMONDS 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH, EDMONDS, WA 98020 (425) 771-0220 DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Description of proposal: The Cascara Townhomes project includes two three -unit townhouse buildings and site improvements at the vacant 9516 Edmonds Way (zoned RM-EW). The north building would front Edmonds Way and the south building would be behind separated by a drive aisle to access parking within the buildings. An existing curb cut at the west edge of the site at Edmonds Way that currently serves the subject site and the two parcels to the south will be retained and upgraded together with the rest of the project's frontage. The upgraded access drive will continue to serve the subject site and the two lots to the south, and it will also provide access for the lot to the west. Multifamily projects which trigger SEPA are Type III -A permits, with a decision about the design of the project made by the Architectural Design y Board (ADB) following a public hearing. y Proponent: Matt Driscoll (d/Arch LLC) Location of proposal: 9516 Edmonds Way, Edmonds, WA (Tax Parcel # 27033600100900) o Lead agency: City of Edmonds L The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse y impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW U 43.21C.030 (2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. c The City of Edmonds has determined that the requirements for environmental analysis and protection d E have been adequately addressed in the development regulations and comprehensive plan adopted under chapter 36.70A RCW, and in other applicable local, state, or federal laws or rules, as provided by RCW f° r 43.21C.240 and WAC 197-11-158 and/or mitigating measures have been applied that ensure no significant f° adverse impacts will be created. There is no comment period for this DNS. o This DNS is issued after using the optional DNS process in WAC 197-11-355. There is no a L further comment period on the DNS. XX This DNS is issued under 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 w M days from the date below. Comments must be submitted by December 9, 2024. c 0 Project Planner: Mike Clugston, AICP, Planning Manager M N Responsible Official: Mike Clugston, AICP, Planning Manager O N z Contact Information: City of Edmonds 1 121 5th Avenue North, Edmonds WA 98020 1 425-771-0220 J a Date: November 22, 2024 Signature: XX You may appeal this determination to Mike Clugston, Planning Manager, at 121 5th Avenue North, Edmonds, WA 98020, by filing a written appeal citing the specific reasons for the appeal with the required appeal fee, adjacent property owners list and notarized affidavit form no later than December 16, 2024. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact Mike Clugston to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. XX Posted on November 22, at the subject site, the Edmonds Public Safety Building, and City Hall. Published in the Everett Herald. Uploaded to the Department of Ecology SEPA Portal (SAW). Mailed to property owners within 300 feet of the site. XX Distribute to "Checked" Agencies below. Pagel of 2 Attac PLN2 Packet Pg. 186 The SEPA Checklist, DNS, and associated documents are available at https://www.edmondswa.gov/services/public involvement/public notices/development notices under the file application number PLN2023-0029, or by emailing the City contact listed above, or by calling the City of Edmonds at 425-771-0220. Please refer to the application number for all inquiries. Distribution List: This DNS and SEPA checklist were distributed to the following: ❑X Applicant ❑X Dept. of Ecology ❑ City of Everett ❑ Parties of Record ❑ Dept. of Ecology - Shorelands ❑ City of Lynnwood ❑ Dept. of Natural Resources ❑ City of Mountlake Terrace ❑ US Army Corps of Engineers ❑ Dept. of Commerce ❑ City of Mukilteo ❑ US Fish and Wildlife Z WSDOT ❑ City of Shoreline ❑ WSDOT— Ferries ❑ Town of Woodway ❑X Puget Sound Energy ❑ Dept. of Fish & Wildlife © Snohomish PUD ❑ Dept. of Health — Drinking Water ❑ Snohomish Co. Public Works © Olympic View Water & Sewer ❑X Dept. of Arch. & Historic Pres. ❑ Snohomish Co. PDS 3 ❑ Alderwood Water District ❑ Dept. of Parks and Rec. Commission ❑ Snohomish Co. Health Dist. 0 ❑X Edmonds School District = 0 ❑ Port of Edmonds ❑ Puget Sound Clean Air Agency ❑ King County - Transit ❑X South County Fire ❑ Puget Sound Regional Council ❑ King County— Environ. Planning T ❑ Swedish Hospital ❑ Puget Sound Partnership ❑X Community Transit N M ❑X Tulalip Tribe ❑ Other �? r a� E s �a pc: File No. SEPA Notebook 0 a d L rt+ N O O M N O N Z J a m E a Page 2 of 2 Attac PLN2 Packet Pg. 187 #P%1 CITY OF EDMONDS ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Purpose of Checklist. The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse i.214.mpact. Use of checklist for nonproject proposals: For nonproject proposals complete this checklist and the supplemental sheet for nonproject actions (Part D). the lead agency may exclude any question for the environmental elements (Part 13) which they determine do not contribute meaningfully to the analysis of the proposed nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Cascara LLC. 2. Name of applicant: d/Arch LLC 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: 2412 Westlake Ave N., Seattle, WA98109 Matt Driscoll 4. Date checklist prepared: 0810712023 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Edmonds 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Revised on 9116116 P71 - SEPA Checklist.doc Attac Prge 1 of 29 PLN2 Packet Pg. 188 7 8. 9. Estimate: Design Review filed on 03/01/2023, Site Development Plan to be filled 10/01/2023; Building Permit to be filled 12/01 /2023. (STAFF COMMENTS) Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. N/A (STAFF COMMENTS) List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Geotechnical Engineering Study (STAFF COMMENTS) Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. SEPA Review, Design Review, Zoning code review. Building/Demolition Permits. (STAFF COMMENTS) V Revised on 9119116 P71 - SEPA Checklist.doc Attac Prge 2 of 29 PLN2 Packet Pg. 189 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. (STAFF COMMENTS) 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. The project site is 11,571 SF, and is in the RM-EW zone. Properties across Edmonds Way to the North are zoned BL- EW (Community Business, BC -Edmonds). East and West are multi -family zones, south residential zones. To the Northwest, properties are zoned commercial WMU (Westgate Mixed Used). The project is a 6 townhouses with 12 parking stalls in garage. Tototal buildingis s approximate 11,200 sf. The building is 3 stories of Type VA wood construction. Vehicular access is provided via a single curb cut/driveway in the middle of the site to minimize its impact on vehicular and pedestrian activity. (STAFF COMMENTS) 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The subject parcel, Parcel No. 27033600100900, is approximately 0.29 acres in size and is vacant. It is located on the south side of Edmonds Way. The site is bordered by undeveloped property to the southwest and residential developed properties to the northeast and southeast. SEC 36 TWP 27 RGE 03RT-1F1-6A) BEG SW COR N1/2 NE1/4 NE1/4 TH E 90FT TH NO2*54 05W 274.02FT TO SELYMGN CO RD TH NELY ALG SD CO RD 12.46FT TPB TH CONT ALG CRV SD CO RD 91.53FT TH S25*29 40E 130FT TH S48*38 13W 103.96FTTAP WH BEARS S25*29 40E 130FT FR SD CO RD TH N25*29 40W 103.95FT TAP WH BEARS S02*54 05E FR TPB TH NO2*54 05W 31.48FT TO TPB SUBJ ESE PUD LESSST HWY (STAFF COMMENTS) U Revised on 9119116 P71 - SEPA Checklist.doc Attac Prge 3 of 29 PLN2 Packet Pg. 190 E= TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other: The northern three-quarters of the site is relatively flat and level. Ground elevations ran eg from approximately 338 feet near the northwest corner of the parcel to elevation 344 feet near the southeast property corner. (STAFF COMMENTS) b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 7% (STAFF COMMENTS) C. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, and muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any agricultural land of long term commercial significance and whether the proposal results in removing any of these soils. Sand with varng amounts of gravel. (STAFF COMMENTS) d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. None (STAFF COMMENTS) V Revised on 9119116 P71 - SEPA Checklist.doc Attac Prge 4 of 29 PLN2 Packet Pg. 191 e. Describe the purpose, type, total area and approximate quantities and total affected area of any filling, excavation, and grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. (STAFF COMMENTS) f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Erosion is possible in conjunction with any construction activity. Site work would expose soil but the implementation of a Temporary Erosion Sedimentation Control plan would mitigate potential impacts. Once the buildings are operational, no erosion is anticipated. (STAFF COMMENTS) g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 75% (STAFF COMMENTS) h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Comprehensive Drainage Control Plan approvals (,including Construction Best Management Practices, Erosion and Sediment Control approvals) (STAFF COMMENTS) 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, and industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. The proposed project could result in localized increases in air emissions (primarily carbon monoxide) due to construction and demolition activities and possible increased vehicular traffic/congestion associated with each project. The proposed project has been designed to conform to the applicable regulations and standards of agencies regulating air quality in Snohomish County. U Revised on 9119116 P71 - SEPA Checklist.doc Attac Prge 5 of 29 PLN2 Packet Pg. 192 b. C. (STAFF COMMENTS) Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may effect your proposal? If so, generally describe. The project site is adjacent to Edmonds Way, an arterial that carries many cars and buses. Emissions from this roadway could impact this project. (STAFF COMMENTS) Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to the, if any: Best Management Practices (BMPs) will used to control erosion. Areas disturbed during construction will be protected from erosion. Erosion control measures may include diverting surface water away from the stripped or disturbed areas. Silt fences and/or straw bales will be erected to prevent muddy water from leaving the site. Disturbed areas will be planted as soon as practical, and the vegetation will be maintained until it is established. (STAFF COMMENTS) 3. WATER a. Surface: (1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, and wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. No (STAFF COMMENTS) (2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No (STAFF COMMENTS) V Revised on 9119116 P71 - SEPA Checklist.doc Attac Page 6 of 29 PLN2 Packet Pg. 193 b. (3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. No fill or dredge material would be placed in or removed from any surface water body as a result of the oronosed nroiect. (STAFF COMMENTS) (4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No (STAFF COMMENTS) (5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No (STAFF COMMENTS) (6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No (STAFF COMMENTS) Ground: (1) Will ground water be withdrawn from a well for drinking water or other purposes? If so, give a general description of the well, proposed uses and approximate quantities withdrawn from the well V Revised on 9119116 P71 - SEPA Checklist.doc Attac Page 7 of 29 PLN2 Packet Pg. 194 C. Will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. (STAFF COMMENTS) (2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. Waste material would not be discharged into the ,ground from septic tanks or other sources. The proposed building would be connected to the City's sewer system and would discharge directly to that sewer system. (STAFF COMMENTS) Water Runoff (including storm water): (1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. The project site presently discharges stormwater directly, testy storm mains. Stormwater runoff would be mitigated to the maximum extent feasible by implementing Green (which may be in bioretention planters that have 2-inches of ponding and amended soils), the installation of dispersion landscape strips where site layout allows. Roof and landscape runoff will be collected in a network of area drains, catch basins and pipe and conveyed to the existing_ public storm sewer in Alder Way. Prior to discharge to the public system, storm runoff would be mitigated. (STAFF COMMENTS) (2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. We will limit the use of fertilizers, particularly nitrates to avoid sending nutrients to the storm water system. U Revised on 9119116 P71 - SEPA Checklist.doc Attac Page 8 of 29 PLN2 Packet Pg. 195 d. 4. Plants a. (STAFF COMMENTS) (3) Does the proposal alter or otherwise affect drainage patterns in the vicinity of the site? If so, describe. No. The project will collect and direct currently unrestrained drainage. (STAFF COMMENTS) Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, runoff water, and drainage pattern impacts, if any: The proposed project would comply with applicable requirements relating to surface water runoff control and water quality including the he City's Drainage Control Ordinance. Green Stormwater Infrastructure (GSI) would be implemented to the maximum extent feasible per Seattle drainage requirements. Possible GSI measures maX include green roofs, trees, landscape strips. The proposed project would also require Cityqpproval of a Comprehensive Drainage Control Plan (including Construction Best Management Practices, Erosion and Sediment Control approvals,) as part of the building permit process. (STAFF Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: X deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other: X evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other: X shrubs X grass pasture crop or grain Orchards, vineyards or other permanent crops wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other: water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other: other types of vegetation: Revised on 9119116 P71 - SEPA Checklist.doc Attac Prge 9 of 29 PLN2 Packet Pg. 196 b. (STAFF COMMENTS) What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? (STAFF COMMENTS) d N 3 0 s 3 0 F- M ca N M U w r _ as E s c� ca ca _ cu 0 Q a> L rt+ N O O M N O N Z J a m E a Revised on 9119116 P71 - SEPA Cheeklist.doe Attac e 10 of 29 PLN2 Packet Pg. 197 C. d. e. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None Known (STAFF COMMENTS) Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other materials to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Street trees and other plantings would be provided on Edmonds Way. This landscape approach is intended to enrich the pedestrian environment and further activate the site. The project would also include landscape plantings, pavers, and areas for seating. (STAFF COMMENTS) List all noxious weeds and invasive species known to be on or near the site. Ivy bushes (STAFF COMMENTS) 5. Animals a. List any birds and other animals that have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site. Examples include: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: urban wildlife: crows. sauirrels. rats. Revised on 9119116 P71 - SEPA Cheeklist.doe Attac e 11 of 29 PLN2 Packet Pg. 198 b. C. d. e. (STAFF COMMENTS) List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None Known (STAFF COMMENTS) Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. No (STAFF COMMENTS) Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: Replacement of vegetation will provided habit and cover for wildlife. (STAFF COMMENTS) List any invasive animal species known to be on or near the site. None Known. (STAFF COMMENTS) V Revised on 9119116 P71 - SEPA Checklist.doc Attac Pqge 12 of 29 PLN2 Packet Pg. 199 6. 7 Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electricity and natural gas are the primary sources of energy that would serve the proposed development. During operation, these energy sources would be used for project heating, cooling, hot water and lighting. Solar energy will also be used to augment the electrical requirements. (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. The proposed project is not expected to affect solar energy use by adjacent properties. (STAFF COMMENTS) C. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: The proposed project has been designed to meet or exceed the requirements of the Washington Energy Code. (STAFF COMMENTS) Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so describe. None known U Revised on 9119116 P71 - SEPA Checklist.doc Attac Pqge 13 of 29 PLN2 Packet Pg. 200 (STAFF (1) Describe any known or possible contamination at the site from present or past uses. (2) (3) (STAFF COMMENTS) Describe existing hazardous chemicals/conditions that might affect project development and design. This includes underground hazardous liquid and gas transmission pipelines located within the project area and in the vicinity. None known (STAFF COMMENTS) Describe any toxic or hazardous chemicals that might be stored, used, or produced during the project's development or constructions, or at any time during the operating life of the project. (STAFF COMMENTS) (4) Describe special emergency services that might be required. (STAFF C U Revised on 9119116 P71 - SEPA Checklist.doc Attac Pyge 14 of 29 PLN2 Packet Pg. 201 b. (5) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: No special emergency services are anticipated to be required as a result of this project. Normal fire, medical, and other emergency services may be needed from Snohomish County. (STAFF COMMENTS) Noise (1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? None (STAFF COMMENTS) (2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hour's noise would come from the site. Traffic noise associated with Edmonds Way. may be noticeable at certain times of day. (STAFF COMMENTS) (3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Construction -related noise would occur as a result of on -site construction activities associated with the proposed project. Residential uses, which are more sensitive noise receptors, are located in the immediate vicini , of the project site. Construction noise would be short-term and would be the most noticeable noise generated by the proposed project. This includes construction activity on -site, at associated off -site construction staging areas, and noise associated with construction -related traffic. The proposed project would comply with provisions of Noise Requirements; no noise variances are anticipated. Once the building is operational, no significant long-term noise impacts are anticipated; the development would U Revised on 9119116 P71 - SEPA Checklist.doc Attac Pqge 15 of 29 PLN2 Packet Pg. 202 comply with provisions of the Snohomish County. Indirect noise impacts from the proposed project may include increased traffic -related noise associated with vehicles operating in and around the development. (STAFF COMMENTS) Revised on 9119116 P71-_SEPA_Checklist.doc Attac Pyge 16 of 29 PLN2 Packet Pg. 203 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. b. C. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Will the proposal affect current land uses on nearby or adjacent properties? If so, describe. The project will comply with provisions of the City's Noise Ordinance; specifically: construction hours would be limited to weekdays (non -holiday from 7 AM to 9 PM and Saturdays and Sundays from 9 AM to 9 PM. (STAFF COMMENTS) Has the project site been used as working farmlands or working forest lands? If so, describe. How much agricultural or forest land of long-term commercial significance will be converted to other uses as a result of the proposal, if any? If resource lands have not been designated, how many acres in farmland or forest land tax status will be converted to nonfarm or nonforest use? No (STAFF COMMENTS) (1) Will the proposal affect or be affected by surrounding working farm or forest land normal business operations, such as oversize equipment access, the application of pesticides, tilling, and harvesting? If so, how: (STAFF COMMENTS) Describe any structures on the site. No, vacant. (STAFF COMMENTS) U Revised on 9119116 P71 - SEPA Checklist.doc Attac Pyge 17 of 29 PLN2 Packet Pg. 204 d. e. f. 9. h. Will any structures be demolished? if so, what? (STAFF COMMENTS) What is the current zoning classification of the site? RM-EW (STAFF COMMENTS) What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? (STAFF COMMENTS) If applicable, what is the current shoreline master plan designation of the site? Not applicable (STAFF COMMENTS) Has any part of the site been classified critical area by the city? If so, specify. No (STAFF COMMENTS) U Revised on 9119116 P71 - SEPA Checklist.doc Attac Pqge 18 of 29 PLN2 Packet Pg. 205 j• k. in. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? 6-20 (STAFF COMMENTS) Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? 0 (STAFF COMMENTS) Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: (STAFF COMMENTS) Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The project will be reviewed by the Design Review Board and city staff for compliance with all relevant guidelines, standards, and ordinances. The project will comply with zoning standards, which are consistent with land use plans. (STAFF COMMENTS) Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts to agricultural and forest lands of long-term commercial significance, if any: Not applicable (STAFF COMMENTS) V Revised on 9119116 P71 - SEPA Checklist.doc Attac Pqge 19 of 29 PLN2 Packet Pg. 206 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. 6 townhouses (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Approximately how many units, if any would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. 0 (STAFF COMMENTS) C. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: 6 townhouses will be provided to the community (STAFF COMMENTS) 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principle exterior building material(s) proposed? Proposed building height 35' from average grade. (STAFF COMMENTS) V Revised on 9119116 P71 - SEPA Checklist.doc Attac Pqge 20 of 29 PLN2 Packet Pg. 207 11. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? (STAFF COMMENTS) Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: No significant impacts are anticipated with regard to aesthetic impacts associated with the proposed project: no SEPA-protected views will be impacted. The project will undergo Design Review which is presumed to mitigate for aesthetic impacts. (STAFF COMMENTS) Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? b. The amount of light and associated ,glare is not expected to differ substantially from that which presently occurs from other buildings of similar height in the vicini , of the project site. No significant light and/or glare -related impacts associated with vehicles entering the sites are anticipated. Stationary sources of light include interior lighting, building lighting path lighting, facade lighting, and security lighting. At times during the construction process, area lighting of the job sites (to meet safely requirements) may be provided, which will be noticeable proximate to the project site. In general, however, light and glare from the proposed project is not anticipated to adversely affect adjacent land uses. Materials and lighting used on the project will be specifically chosen to reduce light spillage and any potential glare. (STAFF COMMENTS) Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No. Li hg t and glare associated with the proposed project is not expected to cause a safety hazard nor interfere with views. (STAFF COMMENTS) What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? m 0 3 0 H 0 �a C� y r _ d E s �a R 0 a L U) 0) N O O M N O N Z J IL c m E t R Q Revised on 9119116 P71 - SEPA Checklist.doc Attac Pqge 21 of 29 PLN2 Packet Pg. 208 Light and Blare consistent with residential and commercial uses in an urban environment, as well as streetlights, may iMpact the proposal. (STAFF COMMENTS) d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: All exterior ( artificial) lighting would be shielded to minimize spillage beyond the project sites. Low -glare materials will also be used for the exterior of the building. (STAFF COMMENTS) 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Downtown Edmonds is about 1.8 mile to the SW of the site; Lake Ballinger is 2 miles to the East of the site. (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreation uses? If so, describe. No (STAFF COMMENTS) U Revised on 9119116 P71 - SEPA Checklist.doc Attac Pqge 22 of 29 PLN2 Packet Pg. 209 C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: On -site areas for passive recreation will be provided. Bicycle parking for the residents will be provided. (STAFF COMMENTS) 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any buildings, structures, or sites located on or near the site that are over 45 years old listed in, or eligible for listing in national, state, or local preservation registers? If so, specifically describe. No (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Are there any landmarks, features, or other evidence of Indian or historic use or occupation? This may include human burials or old cemeteries. Are there any material evidence, artifacts, or areas of cultural importance on or near the site? Please list any professional studies conducted at the site to identify such resources. None Known (STAFF COMMENTS) C. Describe the methods used to assess the potential impacts to cultural and historic resources on or near the project site. Examples include consultation with tribes and the Department of Archeology and Historic Preservation, archaeological surveys, historic maps, GIS date, etc. None (STAFF COMMENTS) V Revised on 9119116 P71 - SEPA Checklist.doc Attac Page 23 of 29 PLN2 Packet Pg. 210 14. d. Proposed measures to avoid, minimize, or compensate for loss, changes to, and disturbance to resources. Please include plans for the above and any permits that may be required. (STAFF COMMENTS) Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site or affected geographic area, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The proposed project is located on Edmonds Way. (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Is the site or affected geographic area currently served by public transit? If so, generally describe. If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Major buses routes located to the North of the site along Edmonds Way. (STAFF COMMENTS) C. How many additional parking spaces would the completed project or nonproject proposal have? How many would the project or proposal eliminate? 12 garaged parking stalls (STAFF COMMENTS) U Revised on 9119116 P71 - SEPA Checklist.doc Attac Pad c 24 of 29 PLN2 Packet Pg. 211 d. Will the proposal require any new or improvements to existing roads, streets, pedestrian, bicycle or state transportation facilities not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). Vehicular access is provided via a single curb cut/driveway at the Northwest corner of the site to minimize its impact on vehicular and pedestrian activity. A fire apparatus road is provided at the Weast sides of the site in conjunction with the parking access. A hammerhead terminates this fire apparatus road. (STAFF COMMENTS) e. Will the project or proposal use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. Ni (STAFF COMMENTS) f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur and what percentage of the volume would be trucks (such as commercial and passenger vehicles). What data or transportation models were used to make these estimates? (STAFF COMMENTS) g. Will the proposal interfere with, affect or be affected by the movement of agricultural and forest products on roads or streets in the area? If so, generally describe. No U Revised on 9119116 P71 - SEPA Checklist.doc Attac Pagc 25 of 29 PLN2 Packet Pg. 212 (STAFF COMMENTS) h. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: (STAFF COMMENTS) 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, public transit, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. It Is anticipated that the proposed project would generate an incremental need for increased public services due to the number of residents and visitors. To the extent that emergency service providers have planned for gradual increases in service demands, no significant impacts are anticipated. (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any: None. The potential increase in residential tenants associated with the proposed project may result in incrementally greater demand for emergency services. it is anticipated that adequate service capacity is available within the Neighborhood area. (STAFF COMMENTS) 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other: U Revised on 9119116 P71 - SEPA Checklist.doc Attac Page 26 of 29 PLN2 Packet Pg. 213 (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Utilities and providers (In parentheses) proposed for the projects would include the followingl. N Water - New domestic water connection and fire service connection 0 Sewer -New side sewer connection to combined sewer system 3 Natural Gas- New gas service 0 H Telecommunications- New telecommunications connection (Century Link. Comcast)_ 0 Electrical - New electrical feed. U N 0 Refuse/Recycling Service (Waste Manaeement/Cleanscapes/Recology) U c d E t 0 r r 0 (STAFF COMMENTS) C. SIGNATURE I declare under penalty of perjury laws that the above answers are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature of Proponent Date Submitted Revised on 9119116 P71_-_SEPA_Checklist.doc Page 27 of 29 Attac PLN2 Packet Pg. 214 D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS 1. 2. (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? Proposal measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: U Revised on 9119116 P71 - SEPA Checklist.doc Attac Page 28 of 29 PLN2 Packet Pg. 215 4. 5. 6. 7 How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. U Revised on 9119116 P71 - SEPA Checklist.doc Attac Page 29 of 29 PLN2 Packet Pg. 216 CITY OF EDMONDS NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AND SEPA THRESHOLD DETERMINATION •12C. 1 89'1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Cascara Townhomes is a 6-unit multifamily project consisting of two 3-unit buildings and related site improvements. Access to the proposed development will be taken from Edmonds Way via an existing shared driveway, which will be upgraded together with frontage improvements. The site is zoned RM-EW. PROJECT LOCATION: 9516 Edmonds Way, Edmonds, WA (Tax Parcel # 27033600100900) NAME OF APPLICANT: Matt Driscoll of d/Arch LLC (for Cascara LLC) FILE NO.: PLN2023-0029 REQUESTED PERMIT: General Design Review (Type III -A Permit Process, Public Hearing and Decision by Architectural Design Board), SEPA Determination COMMENTS ON PROPOSAL DUE: December 9, 2024 Any person has the right to comment on this application during public comment period, receive notice and participate in any hearings, and request a copy of the decision on the application. The city may accept public comments at any time prior to the closing of the record of an open record predecision hearing, if any, or, if no open record predecision hearing is provided, prior to the decision on the project permit. Only parties of record as defined in ECDC 20.06.020 have standing to initiate an administrative appeal. Information on this development application can be obtained online at httas://www.edmondswa.gov/services/Dublic involvement/public notices/dev elopment notices under the development notice for application number PLN2023-0029, by emailing the City contact listed below, or by calling the City of Edmonds at 425-771-0220. Please refer to the application number for all inquiries. A copy of the staff report will be available at least seven days prior to the hearing. PUBLIC HEARING INFORMATION: A hybrid public hearing will be held by the Architectural Design Board on December 9, 2024 at 6 p.m. The physical location is Edmonds City Hall, 121 5th Avenue N, 3rd Floor, Brackett Room. Or join the Zoom meeting at: https://edmondswa- gov.zoom.us/i/88959586932?pwd=RzdPWUIwM09PZ1k1MHN2eWM1YXphZz09 Or via phone by dialing 253-205-0468 Meeting ID: 889 5958 6932 Password: 591531 Attac PLN2 Packet Pg. 217 SEPA DETERMINATION: The City of Edmonds has issued a Determination of Nonsignificance under WAC 197-11-340 for this project. DATE OF ISSUANCE: November 22, 2024 SEPA COMMENTS: Comments are the threshold determination are due by December 9, 2024. SEPA APPEAL: This SEPA determination may be appealed by filing a written appeal citing the specific reasons for appeal with the required fee no later than December 16, 2024 by 4:00 p.m. CITY CONTACT: Mike Clugston, AICP, Planning Manager michael.clugston@edmondswa.gov 425-771-0220 VIT Attac PLN2 Packet Pg. 218 MOORE GARY & SHARRY LINDENSTEIN EDMUND H &JENNIFER L ADAMS COLIN M/ALEXANDRA 424 LAKEVIEW RD 22808 96TH PL W 22806 96TH PL W LYNNWOOD, WA 98087-2140 EDMONDS, WA 98026 EDMONDS, WA 98020 ROSS, RACHEL S/BRAID LEY T WZL ENTERPRISES LLC PUBLIC UTILITY DIST 1 SNO CO 22804 96TH PL W 2800 WESTERN AVENUE APT 112 2320 CALIFORNIA EDMONDS, WA 98020 SEATTLE, WA 98121 EVERETT, WA 98201 FARMER DANIEL T\GASIMOVA DUNYA CASCARA LLC CALDERA GUILLERMO 437 NE 72ND ST APT 321 320 DAYTON ST STE 101 9512 EDMONDS WY SEATTLE, WA 98115 EDMONDS, WA 98020 EDMONDS, WA 98020 0 y 0 0 GETACHEW DESTA/SOLOMON GENET COMMERS TESSA\SARTHYJAY DOYLE TIMOTHY P/MCCLOSKEY MAR' 20204 37TH AVE W 9504 231ST PL SW 9529 231ST PL SW LYNNWOOD, WA 98036 EDMONDS, WA 98020 EDMONDS, WA 98020 y 0 U N HARDIN WILLIAM C KORN JOSEPH/MELISSA DUBBELAAR DIRK 9511 EDMONDS WAY 9524 EDMONDS WAY 9520 EDMONDS WAY t EDMONDS, WA 98020 EDMONDS, WA 98020 EDMONDS, WA 98020-5936 r r cu DANBERG JENNIFER M/DANBERG SANCHEZ GEORGE ANDREW & EDMONDS WAY LLC KEVIN KISSKEYS-SANCHEZ PO BOX 60216 0 C 9515 231ST PL SW 9521 231ST PL SW SHORELINE, WA 98160 EDMONDS, WA 98020 EDMONDS, WA 98020-5022 cn N LINNANE SCOTT G & RONNE M & THE CASCADIAN IN EDMONDS LLC LONG JEFFREY J o SHARON K 901 WESTMINSTER CIRCLE 4826 45TH AVE SW N 23006 94TH PL W EVERETT, WA 98201 SEATTLE, WA 98116 0 z EDMONDS, WA 98020-5004 J a HUGHES PATRICIA A & VAN NOORT FAIRWAY APARTMENTS LLC PETER H PO BOX 713 23001 97TH AVE W MERCER ISLAND, WA 98040 EDMONDS, WA 98020 Attac PLN2 Packet Pg. 219 FILE: PLN2023-0029 Applicant: Cascara LLC (rep. Matt Driscoll, d/Arch LLC) DECLARATION OF POSTING N d N 7 O On the 22nd day of November 2024, the attached Notice of Public Hearing and SEPA = Determination was posted at the subject property, the Public Safety Building, and City Hall in 0 accordance the Edmonds Community Development Code. CU N I, Mike Clugston, hereby declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of v Washington that the foregoing is true and correct this 22nd day of November, 2024, at N Edmonds, Washington. Signed: {BFP747893.D0C;1\00006.900000\ } Attac PLN2 Packet Pg. 220 File No.: PLN20243-0029 Applicant: Mattdriscoll of d/Arch LLC (for Cascara LLC) SEPA Threshold Determination DECLARATION OF MAILING 0 On the 22nd day of November 2024, the attached Notice of Application was c mailed by the City as prescribed by Ordinance to property owners within 300 feet of the site that is the subject of this application. N I, Heather Lakefish, hereby declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that the foregoing is true and correct this 22nd day of November 2024, at Edmonds, Washington. E w 4 Signed: _ Attac PLN2 Packet Pg. 221 Everett Daily Herald Affidavit of Publication State of Washington } County of Snohomish } ss Michael Gates being first duly sworn, upon oath deposes and says: that he/she is the legal representative of the Everett Daily Herald a daily newspaper. The said newspaper is a legal newspaper by order of the superior court in the county in which it is published and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of the first publication of the Notice hereinafter referred to, published in the English language continually as a daily newspaper in Snohomish County, Washington and is and always has been printed in whole or part in the Everett Daily Herald and is of general circulation in said County, and is a legal newspaper, in accordance with the Chapter 99 of the Laws of 1921, as amended by Chapter 213, Laws of 1941, and approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of Snohomish County, State of Washington, by order dated June 16, 1941, and that the annexed is a true copy of EDHI005619 CASCARA PLN2023-0029 as it was published in the regular and entire issue of said paper and not as a supplement form thereof for a period of 1 issue(s), such publication commencing on 11/22/2024 and ending on 11/22/2024 and that said newspaper was regularly distributed to its subscribers during all of said period. The amount itthe fee for st h publication is $101.48. &&J- Subscribed and sworn before me on this 22V �/ day of 1 t.OIILA�e , Notary Public in and for the State of Washington. City of Edmonds Nvelopment Scmces 186031703 MIKE CLUGSTUN P 0 SA �Q.o�` 0.20-20 +4, . 9 i iA @ember10 ?3�''G��`• Attac PLN2 Packet Pg. 222 Classified Proof CITY OF EDMONDS NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AND SEPA THRESHOLD DETERMINATION PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Cascara Townhomes Is a 6-unit multilamlly project consisting of two 3-unit buildings and related site Improvements. Access to the proposed development will be taken from Edmonds Way via an existing shared driveway, which will be upgraded together with frontage improvements. The site is zoned RM-EW. PROJECT LOCATION: 9516 Edmonds Way, Edmonds, WA (Tax Parcel # 27033600100900) NAME OF APPLICANT: Matt Driscoll of dtArch LLC (for Cascara LLC) FILE NO.: PLN2023.0029 REQUESTED PERMIT: General Design Review (Type III -A Permit Process, Public Hearing and Decision by Architectural Design Board), SEPA Determination COMMENTS ON PROPOSAL DUE: December 9, 2024 N Any person has the right to comment on this application during N public comment period, receive notice and participate in any N hearings, and request a copy of the decision on the application. The city may accept public comments at any time prior to the closing of the record of en open record predecision hearing, If any, O or, If no open record predeclalon hearing is provided prior to the decision on the project permit. Only parties of record as defined In ECDC 20.06.020 have standing to initiate an administrative appeal. 3 Information on this development application can be obtained online C at hltps:pwww.edmondswa.govlservices/public_ Involvement/public n olicesldeveiopment_notices under the development notice for R application number PLN2023-0029, by emailing the Cityy contact L.listed below, 0r by calling the City of Edmonds at 425.771-0220. (C Please refer to the application number for all inquiries. A copy of 1J the staff report will be available at least seven days prior to the CA hearing. f0 PUBLIC HEARING INFORMATION: A hybrid public hearingg will be held by the Architectural Design Board on December 9, 2024 at (� 6 p.m. The physical location Is Edmonds City Hall, 121 51h Avenue N, 3rd Floor, Brackett Room. r Orjoin the Zoom meeting at: htips:ttedmondswa- gov.zoom usfl/88959586932?pwd=RzdPWUIwM09PZ1k1MHN2e WM 1 YXphZz09 E Or via phone by dialing 253-205-0468 Meeting ID: 889 5958 6932 Password: 591531 SEPA DETERMINATION: The City of Edmonds has Issued a Determination of Nonsignllicance under WAC 197-11-340 for this project. DATE OF ISSUANCE: November 22, 2024 SEPA COMMENTS: Comments are the threshold determination are due by December 9, 2024. R SEPA APPEAL: This SEPA determination may be appealed by, filing a written appeal citing the specific reasons for appeal with the required fee no later than December 16, 2024 by 4:00 p.m. C CITY CONTACT: Mike Clugston, AICP, Planning Manager CL michael.clugston@edmondswa gov N 425-771-0220 i Published: November 22, 2024. EDH1005619 f4 a� N O O A 111 O N Z J IL r c d E ..r r Q Proofed by Pospical, Randie, 11/22/2024 08:37:01 am Page: 2 Attac PLN2 Packet Pg. 223 MEMORANDUM Date: November 13, 2024 To: Mike Clugston, Planning Manager N From: Jeanie McConnell, Engineering Program Manager Bertrand Hauss, Transportation Engineer Taylor Brown, Consulting Stormwater Engineer 3 0 H Subject: PLN2023-0029 —Design Review Cascara - 9516 Edmonds Way N �a c.> Engineering has reviewed the subject application and found the information provided is c consistent with Title 18 Edmonds Community Development Code & Engineering standards. Compliance with Engineering codes and construction standards will be reviewed with the s building permit application for development of the site. Approval of the design review phase of the project does not constitute approval of the improvements as shown on the submitted plans. a The following summarizes the engineering division design review analysis for the subject C project. ea 1. The subject development is required to provide complete frontage improvements per City Cn standards and ADA requirements. A new sidewalk with street trees will be required along the c property frontage along Edmonds Way. M 2. Olympic View Water and Sewer District are the utility purveyors for this property. Specific N development requirements will be determined by the District. J 3. A preliminary transportation impact analysis was submitted. A complete fee mitigation a compliance review will be completed with future building permit. 4. Preliminary easement documents have been received for a Shared Driveway and Pedestrian E Easement with the property to the west. The south portion of the shared driveway has an existing easement, AF #2110719. Maintenance provisions have not yet been added to the a easement language. A complete review of these documents will be required with future building permit. 5. A preliminary stormwater plan has been submitted to the City to confirm project feasibility. Stormwater management shall be provided consistent with Edmonds Community Development Code Chapter 18.30 and the DOE Stormwater Manual in effect at the time of building permit submittal. Thank you. Attac PLN2 Packet Pg. 224 SOUTH COUNTY FIRE 12425 Meridian Ave S., Everett WA 98208 tel (425) 551-1200 • fox (425) 551-1249 www.southsnofre.org City of Edmonds Department of Fire Prevention Date: 06-02-2023 PLANNING REVIEW COMMENTS Prepared by: Chris Burt These comments are based on preliminary project review only and subject to change. An actual plan review will occur after a building permit has been submitted. Project Name: Cascara Plan Number: PLN2023-0029 Location: 9516 Edmonds Way Proposed Occupancy Group: R PERMIT APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS ❑x Indicate that the correct address and/or suite designations will be posted on the building(s). (Ref: IFC Section 505) ❑x A fire lane is required. See fire lane handout and make all necessary notations on the plans. Buildings greater than 30' require a 26' fire lane. Buildings less than 30' require 20' fire lanes Building. Re -paint as needed. (Ref. SCF Fire apparatus access road standard, IFC Section 503) See South County Fire Standards Link below. ❑x 13D Sprinkler systems required. ❑x Fire hydrants are required in accordance with Appendix B & C of the International Fire Code. On the site plan, show all new hydrants and all existing hydrants within 330 feet. NOTE: A minimum of 1 hydrant(s) be required for this project. (IFC Appendix B and C) ❑x Deferred Submittals Required ❑x Sprinkler SERVING SOUTH SNOHOMISH COUNTY • BRIER • EDMONDS • LYNNWOOD • MOUNTLAKE TERRACE N d 0 3 0 H CU U 0 0 U Page 1 of 2 Attac PLN2 Packet Pg. 225 SOUTH COUNTY FIRE 12425 Meridian Ave S., Everett WA 98208 tel (425) 551-1200 • fox (425) 551-1249 wwwsouthsnoAre.org City of Lynnwood Department of Fire Prevention FIRE COMMENTS 13D sprinkler systems required. One sprinkler system for each townhome unit. Each system requires a separate permit. 6 permits required. N 2. One hydrant is required to be located on the same side of Edmonds Way as the project o within 150' of the project. _ 3. Turn around is adequate. c 4. Fire lane is acceptable. ll M L %i N M U South County Fire Standards link Fire Prevention Standards I South County Fire (southsnofire.org) NOTE: All required fire hydrants, water supplies, and fire department access roads shall be installed and made serviceable prior to any construction, in accordance with Sections 501.4 and Chapter 14 of the 2018 International Fire Code. Standpipes shall be installed and made serviceable as required by chapter 905 of the 2018 International Fire Code. Disclaimer: These comments are intended to assist you with designing your proposal prior to submitting it for permitting. They are intended to identify any "fatal flaws" with your proposal as well as aspects of your proposal that require clarification or further analysis. They are based on a brief, informal review of the plans and other information (if any) that were submitted to schedule your pre - development meeting. However, these comments are not based on a complete review of your proposal and they are not intended to identify all code -compliance issues. The complete review will occur following submission of your complete application, and additional concerns, issues or required revisions may be identified at that time. Chris Burt Deputy Fire Marshal Fire Prevention Services 12425 Meridian Ave S Everett Wa 98208 Cell: 425-327-5800 Pag}e2 of 2 SERVING SOUTH SNOHOMISH COUNTY • BRIER • EDMONDS • LYNNWOOD • MOUNTLAKE TER packet Pg. 226