Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
R002456 504 Holly Dr pdf Redacted
504 HOLLY DR TAX ACCOUNT/PARCEL ':"• 77Si$i3(/I/O6fIP{l�'i11rIF]i rI .a ..i .v •. .�:..• .� _. BUILDING�Lar �Ai CRITICAL AREAS: 68. 07 DETERMINATION::❑ ConditionalWaiver 91'Study Required ❑ Waiver DISCRETIONARY PERMIT #'S: JW 03'dq. 9I 'IDr AP v GCJ DRAINAGE PLAN DATED: Ce '1 PARKING AGREEMENTS DATED�:���y� ,1�,r�, EASEMENT(S) RECORDED ,yFO-Rn::Umj7gA/��Si�A��/+yB�Z",, IYU1't/O�6CCf5rp('en/ 1,gq��r/•��/p PERMITS (OTHER) VRNkIR/I77IGf/10lMPUl/I'f%.V�3RPlEG AbDjq .fK.T/ITPmj ay 1d) fi PLANNING DATA CHECKLIST DATED: A-ID'98. CO • T IR SCALED PLOT PLAN DATED: SEWER LID FEE SHORT PLAT FILE: LOT: BLOCK: SIDE SEWER AS BUILT DATED: SIDE SEWER PERMITS)#:o,,.�fi�'''II GEOTECH REPORT DATED:"t •QY STREET USE / ENCROACHMENT PERMIT WATER METER /�TAP ',CARD DATED: 1-Q. -grot OTHER:77IWW g4.44l(FuO `I W5•oo1(m) LATEM%DSTsUNrms mt File Chaklistdw The City of Edmonds Water Service Drawing EASEMENT NO. NEW CONSTRUCTION REPAIRS 0 LID NO . .................. . ASMT. NO................... OWNER.................................................... CONTRACTOR .............. ................... . .......... ......... PERMIT NO. ) 40— 589— JOB ADDRESS .50.4 .......... -14oi-L�� ...... Dk�YR ... ...... LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO...... .... ................. ... .................... BLOCK NO . .................................... --- I ----- ......... ................................ .. - ... NAME OF ADDITION ..2 ........................... . 5 rA Ave . So. Appmved: PWW'0001.11175 (Rl:v.l 1178) DATE 9.5 .. .... By ,.-»u—r-n::.3.....�..',,;.:+�M�.r-.w+w7`Tv'�'+i-�;n-uh'•..',.,..'9w+%�9'-�G�'o...,,vr- r�ti✓"t,'�..F.'.A•:.A!.�rf..-^,-:a A.;...w,<..n."`".`'"� " CITY OF EDMONDS SIDE SEWER PERMIT p 9p.t9pp PERMIT N_ 8657 Address of Construction: S� D LLY ✓/R/U Property Legal Description (Include all easements): Owner and/or Contractor: State License No. - ,'�,A' Building Permit No. wOSR.� Vingle Family Invasion Into City Right -of -Way: ❑Yes Multi -Family (No. of Units 4-) RW Construction Permit N w Commercial Cross other Private Property: No ❑ Yes ❑ Public Attach legal description and copy of recorded easement A G [ "agtilX�-� 1- 1 R- `-1,S I certify that I have read and shall comply with all city require nts Date . as indicated on the back of the Permit Card. ` CALL DIAL -A -DIG (1-800-424-5555) BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION ONLY * FOR INSPECTION CALL 771-SM, PUBLIC - ORKS DEPT. 3 � Permit Fee: �' Issued By w \ _ Trunk Charge: � UTJ - � Date Issued: � C � - 5 Assessment Fee: A Receipt No.:—lr1 309 Lid No.: Partial Inspection: Date Initial_ Comments Reason Rejected: - / t _ Date —Initial — Final Inspection Approved: - Date -Initial Ev%� (l, po�al bI ** PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOB SITE ** WMb C,: FM G, co, ins9 em..... nA�sn ernue p9p Side Sewer Drawing The City of Edmonds EASEMENT No . ....................................... ................ NEW CONSTRUCTION / REPAIRS r_l LID NO..........._...... ASMT. NO... .... .......... OWNER...................................................... 1— .......................... ....... CONTRACTOR ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ...... ---- PERMIT NO. JOB ADDRESS .50+ .... 4VS.,kj -------- W ------------------------ -- LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO. ...................................... BLOCK NO.... ................ u I 4 PVVW.0001.1 1175 (REVA 1178) T NAME OF ADDITION (4 Approved: DATE '-1.Q�nl .................. By, is •Critical Areas Checklist CAFileNo: 03-5-1 Site Information (soils/topography/hydrology/vegetation) � 1. Site Address/Location: 5�O4 A&IV DR. SOuz� Side r7' SZO& 2. Property Tax Account Number: - NA o L 5Z�z4 ?y nn r, ar; t M o 1 3. Approximate Site Size (acres or square feet): /9 / K /30 f N 4. Is this site. currently developed? _ yes; Zno. ON SiI,E OP C/zFEK , !/iAaUr-A TArjoAl If yes; how is site developed? S. Describe the general site topography. Check all that apply._ Flat: less than 5-feet elevation change over entire site. Rolling: slopes on site generally less than 15% (a vertical rise of 10•feet over a horizontal distance of 66-feet). Hilly: slopes present on site of more than 15% and less than 30% ( a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of 33 to 66-feet). Steep: grades of greater than 30% present on site (a vertical rise of 10-feet over horizontal distance of less than 33-feet). Other (please describe): I 6. Site contains areas of year-round standing water: IYA : Approx. Depth: 7. Site contains areas of seasonal standing water: 1VA ; Approx. Depth: What season(s) of the year? 8. Site is in the floodway floodplain IV4 of a water course.. 9. Site contains a creek or an area where water flows across the grounds surface? Flows are year-round? )lam S Flows are seasonal? A10 (What time of year? ). 10. Site is primarily: forested : meadow // : shrubs j mixed urban landscaped (lawn,shrubs etc) // h I/ tt o S.. 11. Obvious wetland is present on site: IV4 Ga'++ shape, j ta.. Pro�uh✓aF�ser.,�t wrrr cre e�eq /oy� --- For City Staff Use Only fir, 44 I. Plan Check Number, if applicable? e 2. Site is Zoned? IOY» S/N 3. SCSmappedsoiltype(w Adeeywyed IA,4 6nn#1gx 4. Critical Areas inventory or C.A. map indicates Critical Area on site? — C/ Lt Gr k— t GSS S ss 41Sn( S. Site within designs earth subsidence landslide hazard areal X DETERMINATION STUDY QIJIRED WAIVER Reviewed . Date:ZOO �7 C7idral Arens Chcddistdo&3.191001 of EnM • • City of Edmonds Date Received: y- a Development Services Department City Receipt#: oil9,_ Planning Division Critical Areas File #: - Phone: 425.771.0220 Critical Areas Checklist /c� taso Fax: 425.771.0221 Date Mailed to Applican CRITICAL AREAS CHECKLIST The Critical Areas Checklist contained on this fort is to be filled out by any person preparing a Development Permit Application for the City of Edmonds prior to his/her submittal of the application to the City. The purpose of the Checklist is to enable City staff to determine whether any potential Critical Areas are, or may be, present on the subject property. The information needed to complete the Checklist should be easily available from observations of the site or data available at City Hall (Critical areas inventories, maps, or soil surveys). A property owner, or his/her authorized representative, must fill out the checklist, sign and date it, and submit it to the City. The City will review the checklist, make a precursory site visit, and make a determination of the subsequent steps necessary to complete a development permit application. Please submit a vicinity map, along with the signed copy of this form to assist City staff in finding and locating the specific piece of property described on this form. In. addition, the applicant shall include other pertinent information (e.g. site plan, topography map, etc.) or studies in conjunction with this Checklist to assistant staff in completing their preliminary assessment of the site. The undersigned applicant, and his/her/its heirs, and assigns, in consideration on the processing of the application agrees to release, indemnify, defend and hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any and all damages, including reasonable atmrey's fees, arising from any action or infraction based in whole or part upon false, misleading, inaceurate or incomplete information furnished by the applicant, his/her/its agents m employees. By my signature, I certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that I am authorized to file this application on the behalf of the owner as listed below. SIGNATURE of APPUCANT/AGENT Property Owner's Authorization By my signature, f certify that I have authorized the above Applicam/Agent to apply for the subject land use application, and grant my permission for the public officials and the staff of the City of Edmonds to enter the subject property for the purposes of inspection and pospng altendapt'fA this application. SIGNATURE Owner/Applicant: Name DSO Z IT// u-1 .D12. Street Address ,�:-D/n,o/Vos City State Zip Tel....l.....e.#%//T— 7JSh_//lCJ / DATE If- 21-03 Applicant Representative: Name 50*e Street City Email address (optional): I kcQQc� re.'E_ I e� Email Address (optional): Zip Ctiricsl Areas ChmMistdm/4.4.2003 Exception. If you think your proposal may require one of these processes, please contact a Planner for more information. Please also note the attached Landscape and Stream Protective Easement. The City was granted an easement across the property in 1994. PROJECT SPECIFIC CONDITIONAL WAIVERS If the property owner wishes to apply for a spec development permit which they feel would not impact the Critical Areas located on the site, they may submit their proposal to the Planning Department for review. If the Planning Department finds that the proposed development permit will not adversely impact a Critical Area or its buffers, a conditional waiver may be issued on a project by project basis. EXEMPT DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS Certain development proposals may be exempt from Critical Areas Requirements (ECDC 20.1513.040). If you think that a specific development proposal may be exempt, contact a Planner for more information. o Cited sections of the Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) can be found on the City of Edmonds website at www.ci.edmonds.wa.us. CITY OF EDMONDS CRITICAL AREAS DETERMINATION Site Location: 504 Holly Dr Tax Acct. Number: 8439 000 201 00 01 Determination: Study Required Determination #: CA-03-57 Applicant: Greta McKay Owner: Shellabarger Creek Condos CRITICAL AREAS DETERMINATION: STUDY REQUIRED (CA-03-57) During review and inspection of the subject site, it was found that the site may contain or is adjacent to critical areas, including a stream pursuant to Chapter 20.15E of the Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC). STUDY REQUIREMENT —STREAM Based on the above finding, a Critical Areas Study is required to determine the classification and location of the stream on the property. • Stream Classification: A critical areas consultant shall perform the following: i o Classification of the stream pursuant to the criteria established in ECDC Sections - 20.15B.060A4. o Delineate the edge of the stream and the edge of the wetland on the site. o State any mitigating measures appropriate to preserving and protecting the wetland and the stream. • This part of the study shall be performed as a three party contract with the city selecting the consultant and the property owner or applicant paying the fees. When you are ready to proceed, please contact a Planner. • Stream Delineation: After the critical areas consultant has classified the stream and delineated the its boundaries, a surveyor licensed by the State of Washington must perform the following: o Physically mark the edge the stream. o Delineate the required buffers. Refer to ECDC 20.15B.120A for the required buffer width. o Delineate the required building setback from the buffers. The required setback is 15 feet per ECDC 20.15B.080C. o Create a map showing the stream, the buffer and the building setback. • In order to complete this Study Requirement, this map must be submitted to the Planning Division for review and approval. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS ON A SITE WITH A STREAM Development proposals that encroach into the buffers or building setbacks may be allowed through the approval of certain processes. The specific process depends on the individual site and development proposal but may include a Critical Areas Variance, and/or a Reasonable Use a PLANNING DATA Multi -tenant Building Business License Information BUILDING NAME: ? ADB FILE #: SITEADDRESS: 509 (-64, air. ZONING: k BUSINESS NAME: bha-11G-�t SUITE NO. uppu 4—, USE(S) PROPOSED: np t't rac.a'aA ALLOWED?: YeL Legal Nonconforming Land Use Determination Issued(YIN) CUP File: _ PARKING: Use: A'9'14ep Ca..a„ - No. Spaces Required: X (a c� (floor area, # employees, etc.) = I2 BUSINESS NAME: SUITE NO. USE(S) PROPOSED: ALLOWED?: Legal Nonconforming Land Use Determination Issued(Y/N) CUP File: PARKING: Use: No. Spaces Required: X (floor area, # employees, etc.) = BUSINESS NAME: SUITE NO. USE(S) PROPOSED: ALLOWED?: Legal Nonconforming Land Use Determination Issued(Y/N) CUP File: PARKING: Use: No. Spaces Required: X (floor area, # employees, etc.) = BUSINESS NAME: SUITE NO. USE(S) PROPOSED: ALLOWED?: Legal Nonconforming Land Use Determination Issued(Y/N) CUP File: PARKING: Use: No. Spaces Required: X (floor area, # employees, etc.) _ BUSINESS NAME: SUITE NO. USE(S) PROPOSED: ALLOWED?: Legal Nonconforming Land Use Determination Issued(Y/N) CUP File: PARKING: Use: No. Spaces Required: X (floor area, # employees, etc.) = BUSINESS NAME: SUITE NO. USE(S) PROPOSED: ALLOWED?: Legal Nonconforming Land Use Determination Issued(Y/N) CUP File: PARKING: Use: No. Spaces Required: X (floor area, # employees, etc.) = PARKING: Total Required: Actual Provided: 24 Sgxu f 8 <Ff-,,a p. n�P• �^+ 92ivn) Plan Review By:_ [Ylos\pom�ih"PLnNpAC_pmLicOCC • . PL-W-34-7 AID3 ry IA I.) elf, bK $ 24 ciw,.a: , .r, 4u • ''/er4. , 5, G5 1 ,MU .r/Am': Fw.r uw - 4 4Uo ` /` .rn n4.1 t I/30, 14. Z 5pP wr..1.1#.a ;, <w �j Inlw "a - F,-v w, I°/7/99 PLANNING DATA New 1/JMMEP.L IA L_ NAME: IGSO Ghnsr0;1.1 SITEADDRESS: So4 bAd Dr. DATE: %It-12e ZONING: PLANCHK#: 9S-2109 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Caw 2 ex,,a q rck,l S,,, -� USE(S) PROPOSED: C.1, -s - ALLOWED?: ,F " % ,,, �` `3 LEGAL NONCONFORMING LAND USE DETERMINATION ISSUED nl (YIN) or- CUP File: AA ADB FILE #: IV14 OR DATE WAIVED: 9/i=i9a PLANS MATCH APPROVED PLAN: N14 /M o� 6 PARKING: Np.wA Use: 6wJ i No. Spaces Required: X 2 �-n (floor area, # employees, etc.) = 4 Aga", Use: ft" No. Spaces Required: �� d X 31.80, 14._" Za '(floor area, # employees, etc.) Total Required: 4 Actual Provided: 4 ( orwszi.) SETBACKS: /do Required Setbacks: Front: Left Side: - Right Side: Rear:, Actual Setbacks: Front: Left Side: Right Side: R1 Street map checked for additional setback required? � MAXIMUM FLOOR AREA: Maximum Allowet N, C—Y BUILDING HEIGHT: N. Maximum Allowed: Actual Height: Modulation Allowed?: Modulation Height: Datum Point: Datum Elevation: LANDSCAPING: Matches ADB Bond: N. CRITICAL AREAS#: c\film�pmmWP1AND.Y.WC ( \ l u"vl SEPA DETERMINATION: N� naa Pxe+nor SHORELINE REQUIRED?: LOT AGGREGATION REQUIRED?: N= I �110�o2 -�.>'A-R "Nu/tfa.! v.I w;: '" - A03 19�-7I Plan Review By: 2L' Z s...r+r 14a S SM.Hf ZS (I? -:M 8 . a- P—'WA) (, -7 1/800 Co ks 'row Ib roI Pon PIA, 5-h vj M'A� Ga ✓Y-M GWTI y'npCr Sny KJ CUsr spa ' I luw•csPpM SPr.fa i 4PAU,_ to/rs,yr- °Pf4 f�xar - 7 I Hc. [:KlgymnMPLANUA[1,OC TonA - I U svw . 7 1 �Mr sry.t 9/G /9 4 Nn, 1114 rev a Alpo, TOM1 on -S.i = l(e 'form. Z� a ut PAi km&'tiFlmgff' 06) I'- Fuy,,. A'. iv ca,[wc x Zw. = IZ. Z3 GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION OFFICE AND CONDOMINIUM EDMONDS, WASHINGTON FOR MR. TASO CHRISTOPHILIS NELSON-COUVRETTE & ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSVLTING GEOTELRNILAL ENGINEERS, GEOLOGISTS AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTISTS 17311-135th Ave. NE, A500 Woodlnvllle, WA 98072 (206) 4861669 • FAX 481.2510 August 4, 1994 Mr. Taso Christophilis do Butterfield Design Group 400 Dayton Edmonds, WA 98020 Gemochnical Investigation Office and Condominium Project Edmonds, Washington NCA File No. 131494 Dear Mr. Christophilis: INTRODUCTION Snohonlsh County (206) 79"332 Wenatchee/Chelan(509) 784.2756 This report presents the results of our geotechnical engineering study at your planned office and condominium project located in the City of Edmonds, as shown on the Vicinity Map, Figure 1. The site is located in the southeast comer of the intersection of 5th Avenue North and Holly Drive. A site plan prepared by Butterfield Design Group, dated November 15, 1993, was supplied to us for use in preparing this report. The site is nearly square with the dimension of 135 feet in the east to west direction and 149 feet in the north to south direction, as shown on the Site Plan in Figure 2. The planned condominium complex will consist of office buildings and four condominium units. The footprint of the building will be located in the northwest comer of the property and measures 78 feet in the east to west direction and 80. feet in the north to south direction. The building is planned to be setback from the property line parallel to Holly Drive approximately 15 feet, and no setback from the property line parallel to 5th Avenue North. The first floor elevation will be approximately 84.5 feet. A parking lot is planned on the east side of die project. The site is nearly flat with a swale in the southern portion of the site. The Swale is approximately 16 feet deep and contains Shellabarger Creek. Steep side slopes exist on both sides of the creek. A significant Geotechnical Investigation Office and Condominium Project August 4, 1994 _ File No. 131494, Page 2 amount of fill has been previously placed in the southwest comer of the site in the swale area. The planned location of the building footprint extends over the top of slope into die swale area. We have been working with your designers to be able to recommend appropriate geotechnical parameters for various alternatives. The initial design concept along die southern portion is to build a retaining wall then backfill the inside with soil to support the slab. The retaining wall would need to be supported on piles due to the fill located in this area. Lateral loads would potentially be resisted by tying the pile cap back into the interior foundations using grade beams, and by tying die top of the wall by the floor slab system. We have also discussed other alternative solutions, such as not backfilling the retaining wall and designing a structural floor system. The lateral loads could be greatly reduced if backfill is not planned against the south foundation. SCOPE The purpose of this study is to explore and characterize the subsurface conditions at the site, and present recommendations for foundation design and site development. Specifically, our scope of services will include the following: 1. Review available geologic maps for the arcs. 2. Explore the subsurface conditions at the site by excavating test pits with a backhoe and hand pits with a shovel. 3. Provide recommendations for general site development. 4. Provide recommendations for the foundation design and estimates of expected settlement. 5. Provide recommendations for the retaining wall design. 6. Prepare a written report to document our findings and recommendations. As part of our services, we have been in contact with your architect and structural engineer regarding design impacts resulting from our recommendations. It has been our intent to try to discuss design options such that they could be incorporated into this report. SITE CONDITIONS Surface Conditions The majority of the site slopes gently to the west, towards 5th Avenue North. Shellabarger Creek exists in die southern portion of the site. The site is fairly level except where it drops into the area of the creek. The NELSON-COUVRETTE & ASSOCIATES, INC. Geotechnical Investigation • Office and Condominium Project August 4, 1994 File No. 131494 Page 3 vertical relief across the entire site is approximately 21 feet. Steep slopes exist on both sides of the creek with a vertical relief of approximately 16 feet. A culvert exists under 5th Avenue North near the southwest comer of the property near the bottom portion of the swale. The swale area and a narrow strip along 5th Avenue North are the only areas with vegetation. The vegetation consists of large trees and thick underbrush. - Subsurface Conditions Geology: The Preliminary Geologic c Map of Seattle and Vicinity. Washineton by Mackey Smith published by U.S. Geological Survey in 1975, was referenced for the geologic and soil conditions at the site. The soil units mapped in the vicinity of the site include recessional outwash (Qvr), underlain by glacial till (Qvt). The till has been glacially overridden by past intrusion of continental glaciation. The last period of glaciation, the Vashon Stade, ended approximately 10,000 to 11,000 years ago. During the Vashon Stade, the Puget Sound region was overridden by over 3,000 feet of ice. Soil layers overridden by the ice sheet were compacted to a much greater extent than those that were not. Subsurface Conditions: The subsurface conditions at the site were explored on June 10 and 27, 1994 by excavating three test pits and two hand holes. The depth of the test pits range between 7.5 and 13.5 feet. The approximate locations of the explorations are shown on the Site Plan in Figure 2. A cross-section of surface topography and subsurface conditions along the soudrem portion of the building is shown on Figure 3. Our field engineering geologist was present during the explorations and collected soil samples at specific intervals. He examined the soils and geologic conditions encountered and maintained logs of the explorations. The soils were visually classified in general accordance with die Unified Soil Classification System, a copy of which is presented in Figure 4. The logs of the explorations are presented in Figures 5, 6, and 7. The site is underlain by a dense glacial drift (QvDr) or till. Drift, which is very similar to till except that some sorting or layering may be present, was encountered at the bottom of all of the test pits. The drift consists of a dense, gray sand with silt and trace fine gravel. The top portion of the drift was encountered in the test pits at a depth of approximately 3.0 to 13.0 feet. Actual depths of the soil layers can be determined from the soil logs provided. Overlying the drift in TP-1, south side of TP-2 and in the bottom of HH-1, we encountered recessional outwash (Qvr). The outwash consists of a medium dense, orange to light brown sand with truce fine gravel and silt. Overlying the drift in TP-3, north side of IT-2 and HH-2, NELSON-COUVRETTE & ASSOCIATES, INC. Geotechnical Investigation • Office and Condominium Project August 4, 1994 File No. 131494 Page 4 we encountered fill. The fill generally consists of a loose to medium dense, light brown sand with silt, gravel and roots. Ground Water Conditions: Ground water was not encountered in any of the explorations. We suspect that a perched water conditions will exist on top of the less permeable drift or till deposits during the wetter periods of the year. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS General The site is suitable for the planned improvements, provided that specific designs arc performed along the southern portion of the building. We have offered two alternatives in the design of the southern portion of the building. Both plans anticipate the south wall will be pile supported at least along part of the alignment. The southern portion of the west wall will also need to be pile supported. The first method would be to build a retaining wall which will allow the area to be backfillcd. The backfill, if properly compacted, will provide support for the floor slab. To reduce die design of the wall and the piles, the retaining wall could be tied back to the interior foundation system. The second method would be to build a structural slab and not ball against the retaining wall. Backfill against the retaining wall will add considerable lateral loads to the foundation design. The top of the wall could still be tied into the existing foundation system for lateral support. . SITE PREPARATION AND GRADING Site preparation should include stripping the loose surface soil and clearing any vegetation within concoction limits. The site could then be graded to appropriate elevation. After achieving final grades, the site surface should be evaluated for soft or loose soils if the Pavement or slabs are to be supported by these soils. Areas identified as soft or loose should be repaired, as determined in the field. Repairs would consist of recompaction or overexcavation and replacement, depending on soil types and in -place moisture contents, as described in the Slab -on -Grade or Pavement sub -section of this, report. The soils are moisture sensitive and will be difficult to work during the wet weather season. However, wet weather construction is feasible, provided measures be taken during the construction process. We recommend that the ground be sloped to promote rapid runoff of precipitation and to prevent pending of water. Soils that become too wet for compaction should be removed and replaced with clean granular fill. Wet weather conditions should be evaluated at the time of construction after the site elevations and construction process is known. We do not expect a great deal of wet weather construction application will NELSON-COUVRETTE & ASSOCIATES, INC. Oeotechnical Investigation • Office and Condominium Project August 4, 1994 File No. 131494 Page 5 be required or needed. We suggest that a layer of 2 to 4 inch quarry spalls be planned in the budget to be placed in high traffic areas, if the site earthwork is attempted with wet or above optimum soil conditions. Any fill placed in the building pavement areas should be compacted as structural fill. Fill placed in building areas or within 2 feet of pavement subgrade should be computed to a minimum of 95 percent of its maximum dry density as determined by ASTM D 1557 test procedures. Fill placed below 2 feet in pavement areas should be compacted to a 90 percent of its maximum dry density. Excavation Considerations We do not expect that large excavation slopes will be needed under the current planned improvements, even in the area of the wall. However, temporary slopes greater than 4 feet in height should be sloped at an inclination no steeper than 1.5H:IV for the loose to medium dense fill and IH:IV for dense silty sand provided that they am covered with plastic sheeting. If ground water or seepage is encountered, we recommend that the slopes. be reduced to a more stable inclination. We should be retained to comment on the stability of the slopes if seepage is encountered in the excavation. Minimal excavations for the footings are planned along the north and east sides of the building to achieve this finished grade. We do not expect any excavation cuts will effect off -property improvements, such as roads, sidewalks, etc. If excavation cuts greater than 2 feet ire planned, we should be contacted to review the geometry and possibly make shoring recommendations, if needed. Foundations - - General: A conventional shallow foundation could be used on a majority of the site, but we expect piles would be needed along a portion of the south wall and southern portion of the west wall near the swble. All foundations for the structures should extend through the fill and be founded in the underlying medium dense or better native sods. Conventional foundations may be placed on structural fill extending to native soils. Both the conventional foundations and piles may be used on this project; subject to design of the structural engineer. Piles may consist of open hole drilled piers or auger cast -in -place piles. Open hole drilled piers are considered questionable for this project due to the potential caving conditions of the loose fill. Additional expenses and delays may incur if the drilled pier installation method does not work and another method and system is required. We have provided recommendations for each of the foundation alternatives. Conventional Foundations: The footings should extend through any fills and into the medium dense or. better native soils. We note that we found some fill in TP-2 near the center of the site. The bottom of the NELSON-COUVRETTE & ASSOCIATES, INC. Geotechnical Investigations • Office and Condominium Project August 4, 1994 File No. 131494 Page 6 footing trenches should be compacted if soils are disturbed during excavation or the loose soil removed. The bearing soil conditions should be evaluated for appropriate density and depth at the time of construction. Exterior footings should extend a minimum of 18 inches below the adjacent ground surface with interior column footings extending a minimum of 12 inches below the bottom of adjacent slab. Minimum foundation widths of 16 and 20 inches should be used for continuous and spread footings, respectively. Standing water should not be allowed to accumulate in footing trenches. All loose or disturbed soil should be removed from the foundation excavation prior to placing concrete. Conventional foundations along the south wall should be founded a minimum of 3 feet into the underlying drift. We suspect that this can be accomplished along the eastern portion of the south wall. We suggest that this portion of the structure be designed for both pile and conventional foundations. Adjustments could be made based on conditions observed at the time of constrnction. - For foundations constructed as outlined above and founded on the medium dense or better native soils, we recommend an allowable design bearing pressure of 2,000 pounds per square foot (pso for the outwash and 3,000 psf for the glacial drift or till could be used for the footing design. A one-third increase in the above allowable bearing pressure may be used when considering short-term transitory wind or seismic loads. Higher foundation bearing pressures may be obtained, if specific load values and footing sizes are provided for our review. If the foundation soils are loosened due to moisture and/or construction traffic, we recommend that they be protected by a 6 inch blanket of crushed rock or gravel. This material will provide confinement to the underlying soil and help reduce the effect of the moisture. Although structural loading information was not available at the time of this study, based on our experience of multi -family residential structures supported on similar soil conditions and for the above allowable soil bearing pressures, we estimate that the maximum total post -construction settlement should be 3/4 of an inch or less, and that the differential settlement across the building width should be 1/2 inch or less. Pile Foundation: We have calculated the bearing capacities based on penetration into the glacial drift for both auger cast piles and piers. We have provided these values in Table I below, showing typical pile diameters. These values use soil/pile interaction only; the capacity of the pile may be controlled by the structural design. Ile values shown in Table 1, were calculated using embeddment depths of 3, 5, 7, and 10 feet into the underlying glacial soils. Downdrag forces, commonly known to pile and pier loads, have been designed into the load conditions provided. Higher design capacities can be achieved using larger diameter piles and more penetration. If higher values are needed, we can provide them based on actual anticipated pile loading. NELSON-COUVRETTE & ASSOCIATES, INC. Geotechnical Investigation• • Office and Condominium Project August 4, 1994 File No. 131494 Page 7 PILE CAPACITIES (tons) PILE DIAMETER (in) 12 14 16 18 DEPTH INTO DRIFT (ft) - 3 13.3 17.7 22.6 28.2 5 18.1 23.8 30.3 37.6 7 23.3 30.5 38.6 47.6 10 31.9 41.4 52.0 63.9 TABLE I Auger cast -in -place piles are placed with a hollow stem auger drilled to the appropriate depth. After reaching bearing soils, grout is pumped into the auger before starting withdrawal to create a head. Withdrawal of the auger is timed to maintain the grout head, with the auger turning slowly in one direction. If in the event the filling process is not an even continuous event, the contractor should re -drill a portion of the hole to avoid a non-unifom ity or necking of the pile. In order to obtain quality control of the pile, the amount of grout pumped and the grout head should be recorded for each pile. A pump stroke counter and calibration curve of strokes verses volume should be includtd as part of the contractors' oquipment. The volume of grout pumped is compared to the theoretical volume of the pile. Piles with less than I10 percent of actual to theoretical volume should be re -drilled. Auger cast -in -place piling installed in voids or soft soils can sometimes require some additional grout, volumes higher than what would normally be calculated. Them is some risk involved with the use of auger cast -in -place piles, due to the potential presence of rubble or other obstructions that underlies the site within the old fill. We expect, while using a drill, refusal may occur in the older fill. Piles or piers terminated on rubble or with shallow refusal depths, will need to be re - drilled. We recommend that design criteria for re -drilling should be provided with the job plans and specifications, such that the contractor may know how to space re -drilled holes around the abandoned pilelpier, if needed. All abandoned piles/piers (grouted but not end bearing) in the fill should not be connected with the grade beam system. The open hole piers shall be drilled to the appropriate depth and the bottom cleaned to less than 2 inches of loose soil. The holes should be immediately poured with concrete to avoid collapsing of the sidewalls. We should be retained to observe the soil conditions during drilling to verify adequate embeddment is achieved. The risk of open hole piers is that if caving occurs, the holes may require casing. This may or may not be an option, based on the contractor hired for the project. The loose fill found on site is expected to perform NELSON-COUVRETTE $ ASSOCIATES, INC. Gcotechnical Investigation • Office and Condominium Project August 4, 1994 File No. 131494 Page 8 marginally at best with respect to staying open during drilling. Some risk of refusal exists for the drilled piers similar to the auger cast piles. We estimate that the total post -construction settlement of the building should range from 1/2 to I inch. Differential settlement across the building for the same loading conditions should be 1/2 inch or less. Lateral Loads The lateral pressure acting on retaining walls is dependent on the natureand density of the soil behind the wall, the amount of lateral wall movement which can occur as backfill is placed, and the inclination of the backfill. For walls that are free to yield at the top at least one thousandth of die height of the wall, soil pressures will be less than if movement is limited by such factors as wall stiffness or bracing. We recommend that yielding walls supporting horizontal backfill be designed using an equivalent fluid density of 35 pounds per cubic foot (PFC), while non -yielding walls be designed using an equivalent fluid density of 55 PFC. The structural engineer should determine if tying the top of the retaining wall into the floor slab qualifies as a non -yielding condition. The above reconmiended lateral soil pressures do not include the effects of surcharges such as traffic loads or other surface loads. Surcharge effects should be considered, if appropriate. Lateral loads can be resisted by friction between conventional foundations and subgmdc or the passive earth pressure acting on the below grade foundation. For the latter, the foundation must be placed "neat" against the undisturbed soil, or backfilled with a clean, frce-draining, compacted structural fill. We recommend an equivalent fluid weight (EFW) of 250 pounds per cubic foot (PCF) for the native soils and structural fill. An allowable coefficient of friction between footing and native soils of 0.35 may be used. These values include a factor of safety of 1.5. An active pressure of 35 PCF should be, applied to all of die piles in the fill. As shown from our explorations, we suspect that fill extends down to an elevation of 70 feet. The lateral loads can be resisted by the portion of pile or pier that extends into the dense glacial drift. A passive pressure of 345 PCF EFW could be used for the drift. Passive pressure should not be used on that portion of the pile in the fill. The active pressure should act on one pile -diameter. The passive soil pressure should act on two pile -diameters. An appropriate safety factor should be applied to these values. Lateral loads diagrams for retamuhg walls and piles are shown in Figures 7 and 8. Figure 8 is for both the pile or spread footing options that exist along the south wall. NELSON-COUVRETTE & ASSOCIATES, INC. Gemechnical Investigation Office and Condominium Project August 4, 1994 File No. 131494 Page 9 All backfill for subgrade walls should consist of clean fill without organics and be compacted to between 90 and 92 percent of the maximum dry density determined in accordance with ASTM D 1557. Cam should be taken to prevent the buildup of excess lateral soil pressures due to overcompaction of the backfill behind the wall. This can be accomplished by placing the backfill, located within 18 to 24 inches of the wall, in lifts not exceeding 8 inches in loose thickness and compacting this zone with hand operated vibrating plate compactors. Permanent drainage systems should be installed for subgrade walls. We recommend that these drainage systems consist of 18 inches of clean (less that 3 percent frees), frecdraining granular material placed along the back of the wall. The granular material should be placed up die back of the wall to within I foot of the ground surface. A less permeable soil should be placed in die last I foot. A slotted drain pipe having a minimum diameter of 4 inches should be embedded within the granular material at the base of the wall along its entire length. This drain pipe should discharge into tightlines leading to appropriate collection and disposal systems. Slab -on -Grade We recommend that the slabs be founded on a minimum of 2 feet of structural fill compacted to 95 percent of the maximum dry density (ASTM D 1557), if they are to be placed above the existing fill. Some risk of settlement and/or cracking should be expected of any slab placed above the existing fill. We recommend that fill areas, with slabs within the inside portion of die buildings, only be supported on piles and this type of support should at least be considered for all slabs. Where slabs are placed above the existing fill without piling, they should be reinforced to withstand some differential settlement. All slab areas should be - proofrolled with a heavy rubber -tired piece of equipment to identify soft or yielding areas that require repair. The proofrolling should be accomplished prior to placcoicnt of the capillary break material. We recommend that all floor slabs where moisture control is miportant, be underlain by 6 inches of free - draining sand or gravel for use as a capillary break. A suitable vapor barrier, such as heavy plastic sheeting, should be placed over the sand or gravel. The capillary break should be designed to drain into the foundation drain system. Pavements Roadway subgrade preparation, drainage and structural filling where required, should be performed as recommended in this report. The subgrade should be proofrolled with a heavy rubber -tired piece of equipment to identify soft or yielding areas that require repair. We should be retained to observe the proofrolling andrecommendrepairs prior to placement of the asphalt or hard surfaces..A standard NELSON-COUVRETTE & ASSOCIATES, INC. Geotechnical Investigation* • Office and Condominium Project August 4, 1994 File No. 131494 Page 10 pavement design based on expected traffic loads should be used. We recommend a 6 inch layer of free - draining pit -ran be placed under the pavement section to reduce the effects of frost heave. Site Drainage - Surface Drainage: The finished ground surface should be graded such that storm water is directed off of the site. Water should not be allowed to stand in any area where footings, slabs or pavements are to be constructed. Final site grades should allow for drainage away from the building. Surface water should be collected by permanent catch basins and drain lines, and be discharged into a storm drain system. Subsurface Drainage: Should ground water seepage be encountered or excessive rainfall occurs during construction, we recommend that the contractor slope the bottom of any excavations during construction and collect the water to ditches and small sump pits, from which the water can be pumped and discharged into a permanent storm sewer. A drainage system should be planned behind all of the retaining walls. For standard cantilever wall construction, an 18 inch wide blanket of free -draining sand or pea gravel placed behind the wall is recommended. A perforated pipe should be placed along die base of the wall within the fret -draining material. The pipe should be routed to an appropriate discharge point. USE OF THIS REPORT This report is prepared for Mr. Two Christophilis and his associates and representatives. We recommend that this report be included in the project contract documents for the information of the prospective contractors during their estimating and bidding. Specific design plans for the project were not prepared for the project at the time this report was written. We recommend that NELSON-COUVRECTE & ASSOCIATES, INC. be retained to review final plans and specifications to evaluate if our recommendations have been incorporated into the design. Our recommendations and conclusions are based on soil conditions encountered in our explorations, our engineering analyses, our experience, and engineering judgment. The conclusions and recommendations are professional opinions derived in a manner consistent with the level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by other members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions in this area. No other conditions, expressed or implied, are made. We recommend that we be retained during construction to evaluate soil and ground water exposed in the excavation. As part of our services, we would provide recommendations for design changes as needed, based on conditions observed in the field. NELSON-COUVRETTE & ASSOCIATES, INC. Geotechnical Investigation Office and Condominium Project August 4, 1994 File No. 131494 Page 11 The recommendations submitted in this report are based on the site surface conditions observed, subsurface conditions encountered in our explorations. Soil and ground water conditions may vary from those actually encountered during construction, and the nature and extent of such variations may not become evident until construction. If variations do appear, we should be retained to reevaluate the recommendations of this report, and to verify or modify them in writing prior to proceeding with the construction. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you. If there are any questions concerning this report or if we can provide additional services, please call. Sincerely, NELSON-COUVRETTE & ASSOCIATES, INC. �WOV Rick B. Powell, PE Project Engineer 1 EXPIRES t.-n •9t. David L. Nelson, PG Charles P. Couvrette, PE Professional Engineering Geologist Geoteclmical Engineer Three Copies Submitted Eight Figures NELSON-COUVRETTE & ASSOCIATES, INC. VICINITY MAP NELSON-COUVRETTE & ASSOCIATES, INC. CLLYSIAIING GEOJECNNICAL ENGINEERS, GEOLOGISTS AND ENWIONAIENIAL SCIENTISTS BUTTERFIELD FILE NO. 131494 (DATE JUNE, 1994 - .J '� PILES � CC.TN�r/TiprJ,�L 1:- Ft.p^Y SC. i '!- I I I I i I pala:r � I I I I i I � i 1 SKTron/ /t -A SCAIE: 1R=10� C1!�fi: w. rP.I NELSON-COUVRE7-IE3 ASSOCIATES,%NC, 13UTTERFIELD CON$YtTING L.DE GEDiECMENGM££RSNMENf l5. SMOD/$i5 NWROC1ER't:ST$ FILE No. 131494 FlGURE 3 GATE JULY,1994 SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM MAJOR DIVISIONS GROUP SYMBOL GROUP NAME GRAVEL CLEAN GRAVEL pW WELL -GRADED GRAVEL,FINE TO COARSE COARSE GRAVEL GRAINED GP POORLY -GRADED GRAVEL SOILS MORE THAN 60% GRAVEL GM SILTY GRAVEL OF COARSE FRACTION WITH FINES GC CLAYEY GRAVEL RETAINED ON NO.. $,EVE MORE THAN 60% RETAINED ON SAND CLEAN SAND SW WELL-ORADEG SAND. FINE TO NO. 200 alEVE Co POE SAND SP POORLY -GRADED SAND MORE THAN 80% SAND 8M SILTY SAND OF COARSE FRACTION WITH FINES PASSES NO.. SIEVE SC CLAYEY SAND SILT AND CLAY ML GILT FINE INORGANIC GRAINED CL CLAY SOILS LIQUID LIMIT LEas THAN a0 ORGANIC OL ORGANIC GILT, ORGANIC CLAY SILT AND CLAY MH SILT OF NIGH PLASTICITY, ELASTIC GILT MORE THAN 60% INORGANIC PADOEs NO. 200 CH CLAY OF HIGH PLASTICITY, FAT CLAY SIEVE LIOVIO LIMIT e0 On MODE ORGANIC OH ORGANIC CLAY, ORGANIC SILT HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS PT PEAT NOTES: SOIL MOISTURE MODIFIERS:, 1. Field classification Is based On Dry - Absence of moisture, dusty, dry visual examination of loll In general to the touch accordance with ASTM 02400-8D. -Motel - Damp, but no visible water 2. Soli class lllca Non using laboratory testa is based on ASTM D2407-03. Wot - Visible free water or saturated, usually soil Is obtained from D. Descriptions of soil density or below water table consistency are based on Interpretation of blowcount date, - visual appearance of soils, end/or to.[ data. SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM NELSON-COUVRETTE&AsSOCiATES, INC. C0. ULTING GWTECNNICAL EN61NEEx5. GEOLOGISR ANO ENVIAONMENML SCKNTISFG ,1 FIGURE 4 • - LOG OF EXPLORATION • DEPTH Usc TEST PIT ONE 0.0-1.0 SM 1.0.3.0 SP 3.0.3.5 SM 3.5-4.0 SPSM 4.0.7.6 - SPSM TEST PIT TWOA 0.0-1.0 SM 1.0-3C SP-SM 3.0-6.0 SP-SM 6.0-9.5 SP-SM TEST PIT TWOS 0.0-3.0 SM 3.0-6.0 SPSM 6.0-9.5 SP-SM SOIL DESCRIPTION DARK BROWN SILTY SAND WITH ROOTS (LOOSE, DRY TO MOIST) ORANGE TO LIGHT BROWN SAND WITH TRACE FINE GRAVEL AND SILT (MEDIUM DENSE, MOIST)(OW) LIGHT GRAY TO RUST -BROWN MOTTLED SILTY SAND (MEDIUM DENSE TO DENSE, MOIST) (OVOr) GRAY SAND WITH SILT AND TRACE GRAVEL (MEDIUM DENSE TO DENSE, MOIST) (OVDr) GRAY SAND WITH SILT AND TRACE FINE GRAVEL (DENSE, MOIST) (OVDrlOvQ GROUND WATER SEEPAGE WAS NOT ENCOUNTERED TEST PIT CAVING WAS NOT ENCOUNTERED SAMPLES COLLECTED AT I.S. 3.25. 3.75, AND 7.5 FEET TEST PIT WAS COMPLETED ON 6t2794 SOUTH SIDE DARK BROWN SILTY SAND WITH ROOTS (LOOSE, DRY TO MOIST) ORANGE TO LIGHT BROWN SAND WITH TRACE FINE GRAVEL AND SILT (MEDIUM DENSE, MOIST) (OW) GRAY SAND WITH SILT AND TRACE GRAVEL (MEDIUM DENSE TO DENSE. MOIST) (OVDr) GRAY SAND WITH SILT AND TRACE FINE GRAVEL (DENSE. MOIST) (GVDtlOvt) GROUND WATER SEEPAGE WAS NOT ENCOUNTERED TEST PIT CAVING WAS NOT ENCOUNTERED - SAMPLES COLLECTED AT I.S. 4.5. AND 9.5 FEET TEST PR WAS COMPLETED ON 62794 NORTH SIDE ORANGE -BROWN AND DARK BROWN SILTY SAND WITH ROOTS AND DEBRIS (GLASS, CONCRETE AND WOOD)(MEDIUM DENSE, MOIST) FI ILLI GRAY SAND WITH SILT AND TRACE GRAVEL (MEDIUM DENSE TO DENSE, MOIST) (OVDr) GRAY SAND WITH SILT AND TRACE FINE GRAVEL (DENSE, MOIST) (OvOrlOvt) GROUND WATER SEEPAGE WAS NOT ENCOUNTERED TEST PIT CAVING WAS NOT ENCOUNTERED SAMPLES COLLECTED AT IS, 4.5 AND 95 FEET TEST PIT WAS COMPLETED ON 62794 NELSON-COWRETTE 6 ASSOCIATES, INC. FILE NO. 131494 FIGURE 5 • LOG OF EXPLORATION • DEPTH USC SOIL DESCRIPTION TEST PIT THREE 0.0.4.0 SPSM LIGHT BROWN SAND WITH GRAVEL, SILT ROOTS AND OCCASIONAL DEBRIS (CANS, CONCRETE BOTTLES) (LOOSE. DRY TO MOIST) Ow 4.0.13.0 SP LIGHT BROWN SAND WITH TRACE ROOTS CHARRED WOOD, GRAVEL AND SILT (LOOSE TO MEDIUM DENSE, MOIST) T .) 13.0.13.5 SP GRAY SAND WITH SILT AND FINE GRAVEL (MEDIUM DENSE TO DENSE, MOIST) (OVDI) GROUND WATER SEEPAGE WAS NOT ENCOUNTERED TEST PIT CAVING WAS NOT ENCOUNTERED SAMPLES COLLECTED AT 10.0, 12.75 AND 13.S FEET TEST PIT WAS COMPLETED ON 627194 NELSON•COWRETTE & ASSOCIATES, INC. FILE NO. 131494 FIGURE 6 • LOG OF EXPLORATION • DEPTH USC SOIL DESCRIPTION HAND HOLE ONE 0.0.2.0 SP ORANGE -TAN SAND WITH TRACE GRAVEL (LOOSE TO MEDIUM DENSE, DRY TO MOIST)(FILL) 2.0-2.5 SM UGHT GRAY SILTY SAND (MEDIUM DENSE, MOIST)(Ow) GROUND WATER SEEPAGE WAS NOT ENCOUNTERED SAMPLES COLLECTED AT 1.0 AND 2.5 FEET HAND HOLE WAS COMPLETED AT 15 FEET ON 6110R4 RAND HOLE TWO OA-2.25 SM DARK BROWN SILTY SAND WITH COBBLES AND GLASS (LOOSE, MOIST) IFILLI 2.25-2.5 SP-SM LIGHT GRAY SAND WITH TRACE GRAVEL AND SILT (MEDIUM DENSE, MOIST) GROUND WATER SEEPAGE WAS NOT ENCOUNTERED SAMPLES COLLECTED AT 1.0 AND 2.5 FEET HAND HOLE WAS COMPLETED AT 2.5 FEET ON 6R7194 NELSON-COUVRETTE B ASSOCIATES, INC. FILE NO. 131494 FIGURE 7 ELEVATION 90 -- PiGE GAs& US �a STY/n.� GR/IOE b> l / 7r,X�:;,4w& X / o' /VO AXi )/Y 1 / \ �3451x- I \X 2p~ sek:71ON C- C ;GALE /'-.f (t"i&'V) Ga :- ,� R�r PiG6 .DI4MEie.4 NELSON-COUVHETTE & ASSOCIATES,INC. BUTTERFIELD FIGURE 8 CORGMRRG GEOTECNNICAI ENGINEERS. GEOLOGISTS ANG ENNRONMEATAI SCIENRGTS FILE NO. 131494 once JULY, 1994 *STREET FILE GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION OFFICE AND CONDOMINIUM EDMONDS, WASHINGTON FOR MR. TASO CHRISTOPHILIS NELSON-COUVRETTE & ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS, GEOLOGISTS AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTISTS NELSON-COUVRETTE & ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS, GEOLOGISTS AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTISTS 17311.135th Ave. NE, A-500 Woodinville, WA 96072 (206) 48&1669 • FAX 481-2510 August 4, 1994 Mr. Taso Christophilis clo Butterfield Design Group 400 Dayton Edmonds, WA 98020 Geotechnical Investigation Office and Condominilrm Project Edmonds, Washington NCA File No. 131494 Dear Mr. Christophilis: INTRODUCTION Snohomish County (206) 794,4332 Wenatchee/Chelan(509) 784-2756 This report presents the results of our geotechnical engineering study at your planned office and condominium project located in the City of Edmonds, as shown on the Vicinity Map, Figure 1. The site is located in the southeast comer of the intersection of 5th Avenue North and Holly Drive. A site plan prepared by Butterfield Design Group, dated November 15, 1993, was supplied to us for use in preparing this report. The site is nearly square with the dimension of 135 feet in the east to west direction and 149 feet in the north to south direction, as shown on the Site Plan in Figure 2. The planned condominium complex will consist of office buildings and four condominium units. The footprint of the building will be located in the northwest comer of the property and measures 78 feet in the east to west direction and 80 feet in the north to south direction. The building is planned to be setback from the property line parallel to Holly Drive approximately 15 feet, and no setback from the property line parallel to 5th Avenue North. The first floor elevation will be approximately 84.5 feet A parking lot is planned on the east side of the project. The site is nearly flat with a swale in the souther portion of the site. The Swale is approximately 16 feet deep and contains Shellabarger Creck. Steep side slopes exist on both sides of the creek. A significant Geotechnical Investigation Office and Condominium Project August 4, 1994 File No. 131494 Page 2 amount of fill has been previously placed in the southwest comer of the site in the swale area. The planned location of the building footprint extends over the top of slope into the swale area. We have been working with your designers to be able to recommend appropriate geotcelmical parameters for various alternatives. The initial design concept along the southern portion is to build a retaining wall then backfill the inside with soil to support the slab. The retaining wall would need to be supported on piles due to the fill located in this area. lateral loads would potentially be resisted by tying the pile cap back into the interior foundations using grade beams, and by tying the top of the wall by the floor slab system. We have also discussed other alternative solutions, such as not backfilling the retaining wall and designing a structural floor system. The lateral loads could be greatly reduced if backfril is not planned against the south foundation. SCOPE The purpose of this study is to explore and characterize the subsurface conditions at the site, and present recommendations for foundation design and site development. Specifically, our scope of services will include the following: 1. Review available geologic maps for the arcs. 2. Explore the subsurface conditions at the site by excavating test pits with a backhoe and hand pits with a shovel. 3. Provide recommendations for general site development. 4. Provide recommendations for the foundation design and estimates of expected settlement. 5. Provide recommendations for the retaining wall design. 5. Prepare a written report to document our findings and recommendations. As partof our services, we have been in contact with your architect and structural engineer regarding design impacts resulting from our recommendations. It bas been our intent to try to discuss design options such that they could be incorporated into this report. SITE CONDITIONS Surface Conditions The majority of the site slopes gently to the west, towards Sth Avenue North. Shellabarger Creek exists in the southern portion of the site. The site is fairly level except where it drops into the area of the creek. The NELSON-COUVRETTE & ASSOCIATES, INC. Geotechnical Investigation Office and and Condominium Project August 4, 1994 File No. 131494 Page 3 vertical relief across the entire site is approximately 21 feet. Steep slopes exist on both sides of the creek with a vertical relief of approximately 16 feet. A culvert exists under 5th Avenue North near the southwest comer of the property near the bottom portion of the Swale. The swale area and a narrow strip along 5th Avenue North are the only areas with vegetation. The vegetation consists of large trees and thick underbrush. Subsurface Conditions Geology: The Preliminary Geologic Map of Seattle and Vicinity. Washington by Mackey Smith published by U.S. Geological Survey in 1975, was referenced for the geologic and soil conditions at the site. The soil units mapped in the vicinity of the site include rocessional outwash (Qvr), underlain by glacial till (Qvt). The till has been glacially overridden by past intrusion of continental glaciation. The last period of glaciation, the Vashon Stade, ended approximately 10,000 to 11,000 years ago. During the Vashon Stade, the Puget Sound region was overridden by over 3,000 feet of ice. Soil layers overridden by the ice sheet were compacted to a much greater extent than those that were not. Subsurface Conditions: The subsurface conditions at the site were explored on June 10 and 27, 1994 by excavating three test pits and two hand holes. The depth of the test pits range between 7.5 and 13.5 feet. The approximate locations of the explorations are shown on the Site Plan in Figure 2. A cross-section of surface topography and subsurface conditions along the southern portion of the building is shown on Figure 3. Our field engineering geologist was present during the explorations and collected soil samples at specific intervals. He examined the soils and geologic conditions encountered and maintained logs of the explorations. The soils were visually classified in general accordance with the Unified Soil Classification - System, a copy of which is presented in Figure 4. The logs of the explorations are presented in Figures 5, 6, and 7. The site is underlain by a dense glacial drift (QvDr) or till. Drift, which is very similar to till except that some sorting or layering may be present, was encountered at the bottom of all of the test pits. The drift consists of a dense, gray, sand with silt and once fine gravel. The top portion of the drift was encountered in the test pits at a depth of approximately 3.0 to 13.0 feet. Actual depths of the soil layers can be determined from the soil logs provided. Overlying the drift in TP-1, south side of TP-2 and in the bottom of HH-1, we encountered recessional outwash (Qvr). The outwash consists of a medium dense, orange to light brown sand with trace fine gravel and silt. Overlying the drift in TP-3, north side of TP-2 and HH-2, NELSON-COUVRETTE & ASSOCIATES, INC. Geotechnical Investigation Office and Condominium Project August 4, 1994 File No. 131494 - Page 4 we encountered fill. The fill generally consists of a loose to medium dense, light brown sand with silt, gravel and roots. Ground Water Conditions: Ground water was not encountered in any of the explorations. We suspect that a perched water conditions will exist on top of the less permeable drift or till deposits during the wetter periods of the year. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS General The site is suitable for the planned improvements, provided that specific designs are performed along the southern portion of the building. We have offered two alteratives in the design of the southern portion of the building. Both plans anticipate the south wall will be pile supported at least along part of the alignment. The southern portion of the west wall will also need to be pile supported. The first method would be to build a retaining wall which will allow the area to be backfrllod. The backfill, if properly compacted, will provide support for the floor slab. To reduce the design of the wall and the piles, the retaining wall could be tied back to the interior foundation system. The second method would be to build a structural slab and not ball against the retaining wall. Backfll against the retaining wall will add considerable lateral loads to the foundation design. The top of the wall could still be tied into the existing foundation system for lateral support. SITE PREPARATION AND GRADING Site preparation should include stripping the loose surface soil and clearing any vegetation within construction limits. The site could then be graded to appropriate elevation. After achieving final grades, the site surface should be evaluated for soft or loose soils if the pavement or slabs are to be supported by these soils. Areas identified as soft or loose should be repaired, as determined in the field. Repairs would consist of recompaction or overexcavation and replacement, depending on soil types and in -place moisture contents, as described in the Slab -on -Grade or Pavement sub-soction of this report. The soils are moisture sensitive and will be difficult to work during the wet weather season. However, wet weather construction is feasible, provided measures be taken during the construction process. We recommend that the ground be sloped to promote rapid runoff of precipitation and to prevent pending of water. Soils that become too wet for compaction should be removed and replaced with clean granular fill. Wet weather conditions should be evaluated at the time of concoction after the site elevations and construction process is known. We do not expect a great deal of wet weather construction application will NELSON-COUVRETTE & ASSOCIATES, INC. Geotechnieal Investigation Office and Condominium Project August 4, 1994 File No. 131494 Page 5 be required or needed. We suggest that a layer of 2 to 4 inch quarry spalls be planned in the budget to be placed in high traffic areas, if the site earthwork is attempted with wet or above optimum soil conditions. Any fill placed in the building pavement areas should be compacted as structural fill. Fill placed in building areas or within 2 feet of pavement subgmde should be compacted to a minimum of 95 percent of its maximum dry density as determined by ASTM D 1557 test procedures. Fill placed below 2 feet in pavement areas should be compacted to a 90 percent of its maximum dry density. Excavation Considerations We do not expect that large excavation slopes will be needed under the current planned improvements, even in the area of the wall. However, temporary slopes greater than 4 feet in height should be sloped at an inclination no steeper than 15HAV for the loose to medium dense fill and 1HAV for dense silty sand provided that they are covered with plastic sheeting. If ground water or seepage is encountered, we recommend that the slopes. be reduced Ina more stable inclination. We should be remind to comment on the stability of the slopes if seepage is encountered in the excavation. Minimal excavations for the footings are planned along the north and cast sides of the building to achieve this finished grade. We do not expect any excavation cuts will effect off -property improvements, such as roads, sidewalks, etc. If excavation cuts greater than 2 feet are planned, we should be contacted to review the geometry and possibly make shoring recommendations, if needed. Foundations General: A. conventional shallow foundation could be used on a majority of the site, but we expect piles would be needed along a portion of the south wall and southern portion of the west wall near the swble. All foundations for the structures should extend through the fill and be founded in the underlying medium dense or better native soils. Conventional foundations may be placed on structural fill extending to native soils. Both the conventional foundations and piles may be used on this project; subject to design of the structural engineer. Piles may consist of open hole drilled piers or auger cast -in -place piles. Open hole drilled piers are considered questionable for this project due to the potential caving conditions of the loose fill. Additional expenses and delays may incur if the drilled pier installation method does not work and another method and system is required. We have provided recommendations for each of the foundation alternatives. Conventional Foundations: The footings should extend through any fills and into the medium dense or better native soils. - We note that we found some fill in TP-2 near the center of the site. The bottom of the NELSON-COUVRETTE 6 ASSOCIATES, INC. ' Geotechnical Investigation • Office and Condominium Project j August 4, 1994 I File No. 131494 Page 6 footing trenches should be compacted if soils are disturbed during excavation or the loose soil removed. The bearing soil conditions should be evaluated for appropriate density and depth at the time of construction. Exterior footings should extend a minimum of 18 inches below the adjacent ground surface with interior column footings extending a minimum of 12 inches below the bottom of adjacent slab. Minimum foundation widths of 16 and 20 inches should be used for continuous and spread footings, respectively. Standing water should not be allowed to accumulate in footing trenches. All loose or disturbed soil should be removed from the foundation excavation prior to placing concrete. Conventional foundations along the south wall should be founded a minimum of 3 feet into the underlying drift. We suspect that this can be accomplished along the cmtem portion of the south wall. We suggest that this portion of the structure be designed for both pile and conventional foundations. Adjustments could be made based on conditions observed at the time of construction. For foundations constructed as outlined above and founded on the medium dense or better native soils, we ' recommend an allowable design bearing pressure of 2,000 pounds per square foot (psf) for the outwash and 3,000 psf for the glacial drift or till could be used for the footing design. A one-third increase in the above Iallowable bearing pressure may be used when considering short-term transitory wind or seismic loads. Higher foundation bearing pressures may be obtained,if specific load values and footing sizes are provided for our review. If the foundation soils are loosened due to moisture and/or construction traffic, we recommend that they be protected by a 6 inch blanket of emshod rock or gravel. This material will provide confinement to the underlying soil and help reduce the effect of the moisture. Although structural loading information was not available at the time of this study, based on our experience of multi-familyresidential structures supported on similar soil conditions and for the above allowable soil bearing pressures, we estimate that the maximum total post -construction settlement should be 3/4 of an inch or less, and that the differential settlement across the building width should be 1/2 inch or less. Pile Foundation: We have calculated the bearing capacities based on penetration into the glacial drift for both auger cast piles and piers. We have provided these values in Table 1 below, showing typical pile diameters. These values use soil/pile interaction only; the capacity of the pile may be controlled by the structural design. The values shown in Table 1, were calculated using embeddment depths of 3, 5, 7, and 10 feet into the underlying glacial soils. Downdmg forces, commonly known to pile and pier loads, have been designed into the load conditions provided. Higher design capacities can be achieved using larger diameter piles and more penetration. If higher values are needed, we can provide them based on actual anticipated pile loading. - NELSON-COUVRETTE & ASSOCIATES, INC. d Geotechnical Investigation Office and Condominium Project August 4, 1994 File No. 131494 Page 7 PILE CAPACITIES (tons) PILE DIAMETER (in) 12 14 16 18 DEPTH INTO DRIFT (ft) - 3 13.3 17.7 22.6 28.2 5 18.1 23.8 30.3 37.6 7 23.3 30.5 38.6 47.6 10 31.9 41.4 52.0 63.9 TABLE 1 Auger cast -in -place piles an; placed with a hollow stem auger drilled to the appropriate depth. After reaching bearing soils, grout is pumped into the auger before starting withdrawal to create a head. Withdrawal of the auger is timed to maintain the grout head, with the auger turning slowly in one direction. If in the event the filling process is not an even continuous event, the contractor should re -drill a portion of the hole to avoid a non -uniformity or necking of the pile. In order to obtain quality control of the pile, the amount of grout pumped and the grout head should be recorded for each pile. A pump stroke counter and calibration curve of strokes verses volume should be included as part of the contractors' equipment. The volume of grout pumped is compared to the theoretical volume of the pile. Piles with less than 110 percent of actual to theoretical volume should be re -drilled. Auger cast -in -place piling installed in voids or soft soils can sometimes require some additional grout, volumes higher than what would normally be calculated. There is some risk involved with the use of auger cast -in -place piles, due to the potential presence of rubble or other obstructions that underlies the site within the old fill. We expect, while using a drill, refusal may occur in the older fill. Piles or piers terminated on rubble or with shallow refusal depths, will need to be re - drilled. We recommend that design criteria for re -drilling should be provided with the job plans and specifications, such that the contractor may know how to space re -drilled holes around the abandoned pile/pier, if needed. All abandoned piles/piers (grouted but not end bearing) in the fill should not be connected with the grade beam system. The open hole piers shall be drilled to the appropriate depth and the bottom cleaned to less than 2 inches of loose soil. The holes should be immediately poured with concrete to avoid collapsing of the sidewalls. We should be retained to observe the soil conditions during drilling to verify adequate embeddment is achieved. The risk of open hole piers is that if roving occurs, the holes may require casing. This may or may not be an option, based on the contractor hired for the project. The loose fill found on site is expected to perform NELSON-COUVRETTE & ASSOCIATES, INC. Geotechnical Investigation Office and Condominium Project August 4, 1994 File No. 131494 Page 8 marginally at best with respect to staying open during drilling. Some risk of refusal exists for the drilled piers similar to the auger cast piles. - We estimate that the total port -construction settlement of the building should range from 1/2 to 1 inch. Differential settlement across the building for the same loading conditions should be 12 inch or less. Lateral Loads The lateral pressure acting on retaining walls is dependent on the nature and density of the soil behind the wall, the amount of lateral wall movement width can occur as backfill is placed, and the inclination of the backfrll. For walls that are free to yield at the top at least one thousandth of the height of the wall, soil pressures will be less than if movement is limited by such factors as wall stiffness or bracing. We recommend that yielding walls supporting horizontal backfrlt be designed using an equivalent fluid density of 35 pounds per cubic foot (PFC), while non -yielding walls be designed using an equivalent fluid density of 55 PFC. The structural engineer should determine if tying the top of the retaining wall into the floor slab qualifies as a non -yielding condition. The above recommended lateral soil pressures do not include the effects of surcharges such as traffic loads or other surface loads. Surcharge effects should be considered, if appropriate. Lateral loads can be resisted by friction between conventional foundations and subgrade or the passive ' earth pressure acting on the below grade foundation. For the latter, the foundation must be placed "neat' against the undisturbed soil, or backfilled with a clean, free-dmining, compacted structural fill. We trecommend an equivalent fluid weight (EFW) of 250 pounds per cubic foot (PCF) for the native soils and stmetural fill. An allowable coefficient of friction between footing and native soils of 0.35 may be used. 1 These values include a factor of safety of 1.5. An active pressure of 35 PCF should be applied to all of the piles in the fill. As shown from our explorations, we suspect that fill extends down to an elevation of 70 feet. The lateral loads can be resisted by the portion of pile or pier that extends into the dense glacial drift. A passive pressure of 345 PCF EFW could be used for the drift. Passive pressure should not be used on that portion of the pile in the fill. The active pressure should act on one pile -diameter. The passive soil pressure should act on two pile -diameters. An appropriate safety factor should be applied to these values. Lateral loads diagrams for retaining walls and piles are shown in Figures 7 and 8. Figure 8 is for both the pile or spread footing options that exist along the south wall NELSON-COUVRETTE & ASSOCIATES, INC. Geotechnical Investigation Office and Condominium Project August 4, 1994 File No. 131494 Page 9 All backfill for subgrade walls should consist of clean fill without organics and be compacted to between 90 and 92 percent of the maximum dry density determined in accordance with ASTM D 1557. Care should be taken to prevent the buildup of excess lateral soil pressures due to overcompaction of the backfill behind the wall. This can be accomplished by placing the backfill, located within 18 to 24 inches of the wall, in lifts not exceeding 8 inches in loose thickness and compacting this zone with hand operated vibrating plate compactors. Permanent drainage systems should be installed for subgrade walls. We recommend that these drainage systems consist of 18 inches of clean (less that 3 percent fines), free -draining granular material placed along the back of the wall. The granular material should be placed up the back of the wall to within 1 foot of the ground surface. A less permeable soil should be placed in the last I foot. A slotted drain pipe having a minimum diameter of 4 inches should be embedded within the granular material at the base of the wall along its entire length. This drain pipe should discharge into tightlines leading to appropriate collection and disposal systems. Slab -on -Grade We recommend that the slabs be founded on a minimum of 2 feet of structural fill compacted to 95 percent of the maximum dry density (ASTM D 1557), if they are to be placed above the existing fill. Some risk of settlement and/or cracking should be expected of any slab placed above the existing fill. We recommend that fill areas, with slabs within the inside portion of the buildings, only be supported on piles and this type of support should at least be considered for all slabs. Where slabs are placed above the existing fill without piling, they should be reinforced to withstand some differential settlement. All slab areas should be proofrolled with a heavy rubber -tired piece of equipment to identify soft or yielding areas that require repair. The proofmlling should be accomplished prior to placement of the capillary break material. IWe recommend that all floor slabs where moisture control is important, be underlain by 6 inches of free- . draining sand or gravel for use as a capillary break. A suitable vapor barrier, such as heavy plastic I sheeting, should be placed over the sand or gravel. The capillary break should be designed to drain into the foundation drain system. I Pavements Roadway subgrade preparation, drainage and structural filling where required, should be performed as I recommended inthisreport. The subgrade should be proofrolled with a heavy rubber -tired piece of equipment to identify soft or yielding areas that require repair. We should be retained to observe the ' proofrolling and recommend repairs prior to placement of the asphalt or hard surfaces. A standard NELSON-COUVRETTE & ASSOCIATES, INC. Geotechnical. Investigation • Office and Condominium Project A August 4, 1994 _ u File No. 131494 Page 10 pavement design based on expected traffic loads should be used. We recommend a 6 inch layer of free - draining pit -run be placed under the pavement section to reduce the effects of frost heave. - rSite Drainage Surface Drainage: The finished ground surface should be graded such that storm water is directed off of the site. Water should not be allowed to stand in any area where footings, slabs or pavements are to be constmcted. Final site grades should allow for drainage away from the building. Surface water should be collected by permanent catch basins and drain lines, and be discharged into a storm drain system. Subsurface Drainage: Should ground water seepage be encountered or excessive rainfall occurs during construction, we recommend that the contractor slope the bottom of any excavations during construction and collect the water to ditches and small sump pits, from which the water can be pumped and discharged. into a permanent storm sewer. A drainage system should be planned behind all of the retaining walls. For standard cantilever wall construction, an 18 inch wide blanket of @cedraining sand or pea gravel placed behind the wall is recommended. A perforated pipe should be placed along the base of the wall within the frcedraining material. The pipe should be routed to an appropriate discharge point. USE OF THIS REPORT This report is prepared for Mr. Taso Cbristophilis and his associates and representatives. We recommend that this report be included in the project contract documents for the information of the prospective contractors during their estimating and bidding. Specific design plans for the project wem not prepared for the project at the time this report was written. We recommend that NELSON-COUVRETIE & ASSOCIATES, INC. be retained to review final plans and specifications to evaluate if our recommendations have been inwrpomted into the design. Our recommendations and conclusions are based on soil conditions encountered in our explorations, our engineering analyses, our experience, and engineering judgment. The conclusions and recommendations are professional opinions derived in a manner consistent with the level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by other members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions in this area. No other conditions, expressed or implied, are made. We recommend that we be retained during construction to wevaluate soil and ground water exposed in the excavation. As part of our services, we would provide recommendations for design changes as needed, based on conditions observed in the field. NELSON-COUVRETTE & ASSOCIATES, INC. Geotechnical Investigation• Office and Condominium Project August 4, 1994 File No. 131494 Page 11 The recommendations submitted in this report are based on the site surface conditions observed, subsurface conditions encountered in our explorations. Soil and ground water conditions may vary from those actually encountered during construction, and the nature and extent of such variations may not become evident until construction. V variations do appear, we should be retained to reevaluate the recommendations of this report, and to verify or modify them in writing prior to proceeding with the construction. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you. If there are any questions concerning this report or if we can provide additional services, please call. Sincerely, NELSON-COUVRETTE & ASSOCIATES, INC. Rick B. Powell, PE Project Engineer David L. Nelson, PG Professional Engineering Geologist Throe Copies Submitted - Eight Figures 1 FxnmEs t, to -'I Charles P. Couvrette, PE Geotechnical Engineer NELSON-COUVRETTE & ASSOCIATES, INC. VICINITY MAP BUTTERFIELD NELSON-COUVRETTE &ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSNLiING GEOTECpNO ENNflONMENTA�SL FNTI5 T5 FlLE NO. 131494 1 DATE JUNE, 1994 REFERENCE OFFICEIRETAIUMULTIPLE RES. BLDG. FOR A CHRISTOPHIUS I NELSON-COUVRETTE& ASSOCI. PREPARED BY: SUTTERFIELD DESIGN GROUP farmm msrort m rxcw�c DATED: NOVEMBER. 1993 SITE PLi 0 HAND HOLE NUMBER AND APPRO. '-� TEST PIT NUMBER AND APPROXIN • 9 19 29 wlr r-2n BUTTERFIELD S m i m i m i i m =; M M IE m m i i, m m yp �— PILES CON✓E/✓POP/AL 1:- ZLO�;r SI.!a pr: D-o E-e I 1._—_I I I CSI:T:f[%-L-2n0E w I I v• I I I I I I i I i SKT/O!✓ /-t-A� I%Ci' �V:iTK�L) NELSON-COUVAETTE&ASSOCIATES, INC. BUTTERFIELD CONSULTING CFOTFCNNICIL ENGINEERS. CEOLMISTS AND ENVIPONMEMµ SCIENTISTS FILE NO. 131494 FIGURE ,_ DATE JULY,1994 MAJOR DIVISIO GRAVEL COARSE GRAINED SOILS MORE THAN 60% OF COAn OE FRACTION RETAINED OH W. 4 SIEVE MORE THAN So% RETAINED ON SAND NO. 200 SIEVE MORE THAN so% OF COARSE FnACT PASSES NO. 4 SIEVE SILT AND CLAY FINE GRAINED SOILS LKHRO LIMIT . LESS THAN SO SILT AND CLAY MOnC THAN 50% PAOSCO NO. 200 SIEVE LIOUIO LI41T so on YORE HIGHLY ORGANIC 3 SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM NS GROUP SYMBOL CLEAN GRAVEL OW GP GRAVEL GM WITH FINES Of;CLEAN SAND SW SP SAND sM qN WITH FINES SC ML INORGANIC CL ORGANIC OL MH INORGANIC CH ORGANIC ON OILS PT NOTES: I. Field classification Ia based on visual examination of soil In general accordance with ASTM D2400-03. 2. Sell classi (Callon using laboratory teals Is based on ASTM D2407-03. 3. Descriptions of soil density or consistency are based on Intorprola Non of blowcounl data, visual appearance of molls, and/or toe[ data. AIELSON-COUVRETTE & ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSUVWG GEOTECNNICAL ENOINEFaS,(,60LOGISTS A.. ENV W,.ENTAL sor,"$Ts GROUP NAME WELL-ORADED GRAVEL, FINE TO COARSE GRAVEL POORLY-GAADER GRAVEL SILTY GRAVEL CLAYEY GRAVEL WELL-OnADED SAND, FINE TO COARSE SAND POORLY -GRADED SAND SILTY SAND CLAYEY BAND SILT CLAY ORGANIC SILT, ORGANIC CLAY SILT OF HION PLASTICITY, ELASTIC SILT CLAY OF HIGH PLASTICITY. FAT CLAY ORGANIC CLAY. ORGANIC SILT SOIL MOISTURE MODIFIERS: Dry - Absence of moisture, dusty, dry to the touch Motel - Damp, but no Visible water WOI - Visible free waist oT ..totaled, ....fly ..It IS obtained Irom bolo- water table SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM FIGURE 4 ISoltKol9 1a[.7cT111067101 DEPTH USC SOIL DESCRIPTION TEST PR ONE 0.0.1.0 SM 1.0-3.0 SP 3.0-3.5 SM 3.5-4.0 SPSM 4.0-7.S SPSM TESTPITTWO-A 0.0-1.0 ISM 1.0-3.0 SP-SM 3.0-6.0 SP-SM 6.0-9.5 SP-SM TEST PR TWD43 0.0-3.0 SM 3.0.6.0 SPSM 6.0-9.5 SP-SM DARK BROWN SILTY SAND WITH ROOTS (LOOSE, DRY TO MOIST) ORANGE TO LIGHT BROWN SAND WITH TRACE FINE GRAVEL AND SILT (MEDIUM DENSE, MOIST) (OW) LIGHT GRAY TO RUST -BROWN MOTTLED SILTY SAND (MEDIUM DENSE TO DENSE, MOIST) (OvOr) GRAY SAND WITH SILT AND TRACE GRAVEL (MEDIUM DENSE TO DENSE, MOIST) (OvDr) GRAY SAND WITH SILT AND TRACE FINE GRAVEL (DENSE, MOIST) (OvDr/ON) GROUND WATER SEEPAGE WAS NOT ENCOUNTERED TEST PIT CAVING WAS NOT ENCOUNTERED SAMPLES COLLECTED AT 1.5, 325, 3.75, AND 7.5 FEET TEST PIT WAS COMPLETED ON 6WI94 SOUTH SIDE DARK BROWN SILTY SAND WITH ROOTS (LOOSE, DRY TO MOIST) ORANGE TO LIGHT BROWN SAND WITH TRACE FINE GRAVEL AND SILT (MEDIUM DENSE, MOIST) (Ovr) GRAY SAND WITH SILTAND TRACE GRAVEL (MEDIUM DENSE TO DENSE, MOIST) (OvOr) GRAY SAND WITH SILT AND TRACE FINE GRAVEL (DENSE, MOIST) (OVDr/ON) GROUND WATER SEEPAGE WAS NOT ENCOUNTERED TEST PIT CAVING WAS NOT ENCOUNTERED SAMPLES COLLECTED AT I.S. 4.5, AND 9.5 FEET TEST PIT WAS COMPLETED ON S27/94 NORTH SIDE ORANGE -BROWN AND DARK BROWN SILTY SAND WITH ROOTS AND DEBRIS (GLASS, CONCRETE AND WOOD)(MEDIUM DENSE, MOIST) FI ILLI GRAY SAND WITH SILT AND TRACE GRAVEL (MEDIUM DENSE TO DENSE, MOIST) (OvOr) GRAY SAND WITH SILT AND TRACE FINE GRAVEL (DENSE, MOIST) (OVDr/ON) GROUND WATER SEEPAGE WAS NOT ENCOUNTERED TEST PIT CAVING WAS NOT ENCOUNTERED SAMPLES COLLECTED AT IS. 4.5 AND 9.5 FEET TEST PIT WAS COMPLETED ON =VD4 NELSON-COUVRETTE & ASSOCIATES, INC. FILE NO. 1314M FIGURE 5 DEPTH • • LOG OF EXPLORATION USC SOIL DESCRIPTION - TESTPITTHREE 0.0-4.0 SPSM LIGHT BROWN SAND WITH GRAVEL, SILT ROOTS AND OCCASIONAL DEBRIS (CANS, CONCRETE BOTTLES) (LOOSE. DRY TO MOIST) FI ILLI 4.0-13.0 SP LIGHT BROWN SAND WITH TRACE ROOTS CHARRED WOOD, GRAVEL AND SILT (LOOSE TO MEDIUM DENSE, MOIST) OLU 13.0-13.5 SP GRAY SAND WITH SILT AND FINE GRAVEL (MEDIUM DENSE TO DENSE, MOIST) (DVDr) GROUNDWATER SEEPAGE WAS NOT ENCOUNTERED TEST PIT CAVING WAS NOT ENCOUNTERED SAMPLES COLLECTED AT 10.0. 12.75 AND 13.5 FEET TEST PIT WAS COMPLETED ON G 754 NELSON-COWRETTE & ASSOCIATES, INC. FILE NO. 131494 FIGURE 6 LOG OF EXPLORATION DEPTH USC SOIL DESCRIPTION NAND HOLE ONE - 0.0 - 2.0 SP ORANGE -TAN SAND WITH TRACE GRAVEL (LOOSE TO MEDIUM DENSE. DRY TO MOIST) �I ,) 2.0.2.5 SM LIGHT GRAY SILTY SAND (MEDIUM DENSE, MOIST) (Om) GROUND WATER SEEPAGE WAS NOT ENCOUNTERED SAMPLES COLLECTED AT 1.0 AND 2.5 FEET HAND HOLE WAS COMPLETED AT 2.5 FEET ON WIG94 HAND HOLE TWO 0.0-2.25 SM DARK BROWN SILTY SAND WITH COBBLES AND GLASS (LOOSE. MOIST) IFILLI 2.25-25 SP-5M LIGHT GRAY SAND WITH TRACE GRAVEL AND SILT (MEDIUM DENSE, MOIST) GROUND WATER SEEPAGE WAS NOT ENCOUNTERED SAMPLES COLLECTED AT 1.0 AND 2.5 FEET HAND HOLE WAS COMPLETED AT 2.5 FEET ON 6R7/94 NELSON-COWRETTE & ASSOCIATES, INC. FILE NO.131494 FIGURE7 ELEvNTION 9u r PILE CA56 9s, FYF CR/IOE ¢�r X / �� i jr fISSN✓�C' NO /•1.0I) � I /�;j lltfi�ilG Pr'ESsu�S �o I- 64S P[F 02�FT x 2� 60 Sce; pow c- c" � 95r P/cc- .o�M+ErcA_ NELSON-COUVRETTE&ASSOCIATES, INC. BUTfERFiELD - '��` 8 COMSUL GEOTE[HMN,1iNVRONMENiA S E"S s FILE NO. DATE 131494 JULY,1994 C�%v/11rcAi/ YG r 10 j+ 1Lt: 7G 60 p/c.E ozliiC��P FWf.'+V4 /Jo PvIssoe cxar/wo- Gw+nc F=o•s \ oa�<r XLcnaN JD-/3 scale p=S CN4I/) NELSON-COUVRETTE & ASSOCIATES, INC. GpryyµilNG GEOTECNIIIO I EONOOO�M� WENTOOISTS $4.5 PCF X2W BUTTERFIELD FILE no. 131494 DATE JULY.1994 f;�+ ,k 7az-Z III l��.g4:5 ma $8.0 W 'LHOL-r-� m,:-&vAlt3p v1A Fzv*-Cia2 -r7eEp oiACJK � O\wWeD q�,6TED P>y ICON FAi1F,2 I> Zccc, i3�hLlt-{G 'CfaFY- (3J 4:40AVSulf iaND `�Lh7L� �IF{6�i �- l� 0 '40812000, COPY ORIGINAL ON FILE IN THE COUNTY AUDITOR'S OFFICE DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANT WHEREAS, Anastasi0s G. & Voula A Christophilis are the owners of thc following described real estate in the City of Edmon it: The E 135ft of W 165ft of the N 199ft of S 206ft of N' of NWT of the Nwls of the NW.q in section 25 t ^ township 27 in range 3. '0 l WHEREAS, the above named owners am. desirous of imposing a restrictive covenant upon said Premises in compliance with Section 19.0D.040 of the Edmonds Community Development Code. WITNESSETH: that for and in consideration of the pmrrdw, the above named owners do hereby declare and grant to the City of Edmonds as Grantee the following restrictive covenant, to -wit:. That at the time of the, ,mention of this Covenant the Grantors have agreed or the Ordinance of the City of Edmonds provide that no building for multiple family housing may be ereted on subject property containing more than _9 • units: Said Covenant shall be binding upon all present and future owners of said real estate and their heirs, successors and assigns. , DATED this {O day of 4,0-, I9-�y Crnntor Grantor — V STATE OF WASHINGTON) ss. COUNTY OF SNOHOAUSH) - - - t `An this day personally appeared before me �i7cf S�/'CLJas'c71 0 u=�1'— • � � �'^�Q�-, "t S to me (mown to be the individuals described in and who executed within the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that they signed the same as their free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. GIVEN under my hand and official seal this 10 of tzC , 19 9 T o - ry public in and fo the State o Washington, residing at °( naaaovEooAtE I _ � etnc t�c�u V? p[ pf�fd04 �Rf1LSf G'3 �j ,[( 2 Any request for modification, variance or other d administrative. deviation (hereinafter "variance") O must be specifically called out and identified. V Approval of any plat or plan containing provisions which do not comply with city code and for which a variance has not been specifically identified, V) requested and considered by the appropriate city official in accordance with the appropriate provision of city code or state law does not approve any items not to code specification. 132003 Edition iRC (e/WAC Amen 52003 Edi'uaa IBC w/WAC Amen 02003 Edition UPC w/WAC Amex and Appendices A, B, C31 02003 Edition IMC wf WAC Amer O2003 Edition WM w/WAC Ame 02003 Edition B'C w/WAC Amen( 02003 Edition VIAQ WAC 51-13 02004 STREET FILE PER81T COUNTER fit/ .•Q. a iui . 11,94V" 1 Ze �cesp �J oOUip�Jn�� •J I „w .81, rm�m titmil�y, 0 0 13' 3.5' u3' 3.5, lawiv, vw rlur---_ V 65- 57a 6i N STREET FILE • RECEIVED NOY 2 8 2005 PERMIT COUNTER L J Ci Aov i We.11 "e's Clinic s' SaP STREET FILE 7s) 35' -,T�zV-- Free Nr �e 5"'-A ve—Y LIC SO ��II i�ouw ed }o Ju �diuq A ESUB DEC 212005 0UIILLOINooF SE M17 300 m Hoko Aiern) rasf5 ins �29a1 eYwooc�J�allBld Lyv,hwoo d WA 99D36 STREET M-LE ► PLANNING DATA SIGNS SITE ADDRESS: 501, t+O ll1.l pY1 Ve- * 100- ZONING: gG �cI0WV11'UWV1> DATE: I'VI OI I VMF PLAN CHK#:. 0 5- 59Z NAME OF BUILDING PERMIT APPLICANT: 01 t`40Yj VJPW y e-S'5 GI I VI IC PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 1YI421-All 9- %Arnll ff(3V1. ^Dry> ADB FILE #: OR DATE WAIVED: fY- PLANS MATCH APPROVED PLAN: TOTAL AREA PER TYPE nF: Slprd• - TOTAL Sign area. Allowed Matrix Area allowed Type of in Conditions Allowed Per for this Sin Zone? Met? Unit Unit sign Example Wall, w/ Internal Yes, w/ cond. Yes 1 sq. ft/lin. ft. of 41 foot attached 41 square feet Ilium. attached wall wall SIGN 1 Wall yLh _ \I 35' tea t Sop A SIGN 2 SIGN 3 TOTAL SIGN AREA FOR SITE I TENANT: Maximum Allowed: q F � previous Total: Proposed Total: I b 10" w\i l X 11, long _ O.S3 I x 11 — �1.1(a r7i9h AYt:a pwQoirl:..aC-, I:\Iibl-rj\Pmnfng\fo—&handouu\gaffrepons\^piwda-SIGN.da SIGN HEIGHT: Sign Type: (4)1111 Maximum Allowed: AWLUAd Actual Height: .b1d j Sign Type: '"'�— Maximum Allowed: Actual Height: Sign Type: Maximum Allowed: Actual Height: SIGN LIGHTING Sign Type: Inl p (1 Lighting Proposed: j1 6Yt-2� Allowed in this Zone: Dle-- Sign Type: Lighting Proposed: Allowed in this Zone: Sign Type: Lighting Proposed: Allowed in this Zone: SIGN COLORS: Approval? ✓I.r— SIGN LOCATION: Proposed: IA161II If Freestanding and 3 feet or over (unless on a fence) meets setbacks?_ Required Setbacks: Front: Left Side: Ri I e: Rear: Actual Setbacks: Front: Left Side: Right Side: Rear: LANDSCAPING FOR FREESTANDING SIGNS: Size: Location: CRITICAL AREAS # (Freestanding Signs Waiver I Meets CA requirements REDUCED SITE PLAN (8.5X11) PROVIDED FOR STREET FILE? �. I Q . , i C 14ibary�p1m.iag\f..&handowe\stata Rrep mklpla dat_SIGN .doc CITY OF FLAY ONDS BARBARA FAHEY MAYOR 2505TH AVENUE NORTH • EOMONDS, WA98020 • 12061771-0220 • FAX12081771-0221 ' COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT F 0 Public Works • Planning • Parks and Recreation • Engineering st. 189 August 5, 1996 Anastasious Christophilis Shellabarger Creek Build' n 504 Holly Drive Edmonds, Wa 98020 Rr 1 Re: ADDITIONAL ADDRESS OFF OF S - k. U40 ' 1(L The City has received your request for a second address for the{ Shellabarger Building. Since you have a well-defined condominium entrance from Holly Drive as well as a well-defined 5th Avenue South entrance, the Building Official, with the concurrence of the Fire Marshall, has determined that an exception will be made to the policy of only one address for each building. Therefore, the address of 525 5th Avenue South has been assigned to the 5th Avenue entrance of the Shellabarger Building. The landlord is responsible to assign suite numbers in a consecrative manner. If the office space on the second floor is accessed from Holly Drive then it must be addressed as such with an appropriate suite number. The City will notify all applicable departments of this additional address. It is your resposibility to notify all other interested parties, including the Post Office. If you have any questions you may call me at 771-0220. Thank you, Sharon Nolan Permit Coordinator cc. Fire Police Public Works Utility Billing Address Files Street Files Engineering Building Official ADDRESS.DOC/TEMPBLDG •Incorporated August II, 1890 Sister Cities Interns Nonal — Hn4tnan .1 DA Zone F ' N.W. 1/4, SEC. 25 T.27N., R.3 E.W.M. 153 Jmw HM Y`M�e~Es '�9 SIa v'� vh nnnM � II' e� riJ V19 Nam+ a^�'ww�GrlLS )S �I� y L�« ~ 41 .143, GB �l nL ran nn� Oi • CITY OF EDMONDS 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS, WA 99020 • (425) 7710220 • FAX (425) 7710221 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT Planning • Building • Engineering e���4I January 24, 2000 Roy Whitcutt 660 Edmonds Way #C Edmonds, WA 98020 Re: Address of Christopholis Building GARY HAAKENSON MAYOR This letter is to confirm that the residential units of this building -are addressed off of Holly Drive and the Retail spaces are addressed off of 5" Ave South. The owner of the building is responsible to address each individual suite/condo and inform the Post Office. T�ou, Lara Knaak Permit Coordinator • Incorporated August 11, 1890 Sister City - Hekinan, Japan l890 qo -19 City of IF4monds� RIGHT-OF-WAY CONSTRUCTION PERNfIT Pet. l:Mtmbv: W. Date: A. Address or Vicinity of Construction: s5&/ ✓ B. Type of Work (be specific):.$'/%!' Z(cf4070n� ed .C-774 A✓27— C. Contractor: Akel Ye- COA&7— Contact: ,�t?C W-4651iu iwl(r Z2$ Mailing Address: /ZO/!,2n7i✓ Si Sg � -- -?5\/, zD�y State Licesse 11: fefF,P' e7- /&6/14 - Liability Insurance: I'=' Bond: $ %)/sE1- D.., Building Permit N (if applicable): qj/QS"92 - Side Sewer Permit p (if applicable): E. .❑/ Cbuwe¢iul ❑ Subdivision 1). City Project ❑ Utility (PUD, GTE, WNG, CABLP; WATER) ❑ Multi -Family ❑ Single FamilyOther INSPECTOR: A• L. CN.P5^&/ INSPECTOR: F. Pavement or Concrete Cut: ❑ Yq—,No G. Sire of cut: _ x 1 IL Charge-$ AYLICANT TO READ AND SIGN INDEMNITY: Apaliwnt urtdwetande andby Mieeignawreto Nieoayfieatlon, agrees to MMthe Ctity o(FAmoMeharmlwe(.omin(unw, danragee, or cWaru fany Miod or description waouceam, foreseen or onf rween, that may be made again d the Gay of EdmomG, ar onyy of U. depurbnenle or employwe,ioet-&mornot lunitedtotAedefomeofooyleaoleroeeed&o9,Io ofinadot--r,a Wbmoyfwe by nmono/awnl6,atNepenMt THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WORKMANSHIP AND MATERIALS FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FOLLOWING THE FINAL INSPECTIONAND ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK ESTIMATED RESTORATION FEES WILL BE HELD UNTIL THE FINAL STREET PATCH ISCOMPLETED BYCITYPORCES, ATWHICH TIMEA DERITOR CREDIT WILLREPROCESSEDFORISSUANCE TOTHEAPPLICANT. Construction drawing of proposed work required with permit application.'�r 'A 24 hour notice is required for inspegtion; Please call the Engineering Division, 771-0220. - Work and material is to be inspected -during progress and at completion. Restoration is to be in accordance with City Codes. Street shall be kept clean et all times. Traffic Control and PubkSafety shall be in accordance with City regulations as required by the City Engineer. All streetcutditches shall be patched with asphalt or City approved material prior to the eudofthe workingday; NO EXCEPTIONS. ie o a' at all times I)T insff ction pul-ses. I r : Date: 'Contractor or Agent) CALL DIAL -A -DIG PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK FOR CITY USE, ONLY �) APPROVED BY: RIGHT OF WAY DEPOeA62 TIME AUTHORIZED: VOID AFTER I YlgLe-1,12, DISRUPTION FEEYFUND Ill: SPECIAL CONDITIONS: A�X '(-5A S .RESTORATION FEE: A.0e'306f&b 6Y 617Y EIVO A/6E72_ - .PeRMrr ME: - COMMENTS: RBCEIWr DATE: r - ISSUEII'BY: NO WORK SHALL BEGIN PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE FAa Div. IwC 9 • 0 0 Date: 27 Nov 95 To: Pat Hams, Parks Maint. Supervisor 46rom: Lyle. Chrisman, Engineering Inspector Subject: TREE PLANTINGS U HOLLYD I contacted the owner of the bulding on 5th Ave. this afternoon regarding the planting of the ornamental pear trees instead of that species of maple. He didn't really care what trees were placed along 5th Ave., but I did remind him that pruning and maintaining the view for the residents was his responsibility. Installation of the trees can happen whenever you can schedule it. City of Edmonds S Engineering Division PATHARISMOC X^� MEMORANDUM 11= Date: June 12, 1995 To: Sharon Nolan, Permit Coordinator From: Lyle Chrisman, Engnincering Inspector Subject: Christophillis Engineering Final- 505 Holly Dr Prior to and during the final inspection of the subject project it was noted the street trees, installed by the conbactor on 5th ave created a traffic "safety hazard and sight obstruction. This concern was brought to John Bissell's attention near the end of May and after a meeting between he and Jim Walker, City Engineer, on June 8th 1995, it was agreed that planning would not release the landscape bond until a solution is reached regarding the aforementioned trees. With the issue of the trees covered, engineering has signed off on the permit and can release the performance bond. Hopefully the issue with the trees will be resolved by June 16, 1995. City of Edmonds. S Engineering Division 505HOLLY.DDC STREET FjLj.SC"E AND STREAM RECOROEL PROTECTIVE EASEMENT 34 SEP —6 1`4:16 In the matter of the commercial development of the Chrj%VjiIJ*1 jmj�t�01,Imted at the southeast comer of 5th Avenue S. and Holly SMWISTrYRE �O of Edmonds, KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that ANASTASIOS CHRISTOPHILIS, owner and developer (hereinafter referred to as "Grantor"), for and in consideration of benefits to be mutually received and other valuable considerations, does hereby grant, Warrant and convey unto the GRANTEE, THE CITY OF EDMONDS, a municipal corporation of the State of Washington, (hereinafter referred to as the "Grantee"), a permanent easement over the area within 15 feet of the top of the stream bank on both sides of the stream on the site to preserve and protect the stream and native plants from impacts of development. The landscaped d: protection easement shall not preclude maintenance and planting of native species plants and trees and removal of non-native or diseased plant species as approved by the City of Edmonds Architectoral Design Board, or the installation of necessary utilities over, under and across said easement as may be approved for the operation of said development. t� Dated this day 199-Y—. W--� FA EXCISE TAX Anastasios Christophilis, Owner/D &eloper REQUIRED STATE OF WASHINGTON ) 3EP 2 8 1994 OFF_ SS. [I[[E SIBERS, Soohomuh (our4 Treeserer COUNTY OFF""ate ) By KIRKE SIEVERS On this day personally appeared before me�� to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that his — signed the same as At--) free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. GIVEN my hand and offrcial seal this 6 day off- ( ii 199 . �Za v ^ „"••. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, i:`C. ,........ s,f.%: residing at �Ldna-e,�aEd� "t vo(.2955PAGE0968 International Conference of Building Officials REGIONAL OFFICE: 2122-112th AVENUE, N.E., SUITE B-300 B BELLEVUE, WASHINGTON 98004 B (2061451-9541 BOARD OF DIRECTORS CHAIRMAN JAN P. GASTERWID.C.B.O. WILDING CODE OFFICER SE PAUL MY NE l FIRSTVICECHAIRMAX RCx PERKEREWICZ C.BA. DIRECTOR OF COLMUNEY DEVELOPMENT COUNTY OF KREAR Poor ORCHARD. WASHINGTON SECOND VICECHAIRMAM T HO W S A. TXOYPBOII, DIED. BUILDINGORUC LL RECOURELOODLONnOJ IMMEDATEPASTCHAIRMAN BOB FO OF OU RE, Fiy C.BA. DIRECTgi OFBUILDINGPISPECTKMI A01LExE TEX0.5 WWDJ.RM,RBFAAC.B.D. BUILDING Carl BOULDER Cnv, NEVADA HDx OULLOpL,D.BD. CNIEF SANDY, LEAN CMI swot/ UTAH PAULLEME. MANAGER. BUILDING AND CODE ENFORCEMENT VNNCOIYER. WABHMGTON FIE-HEMIAx CMEFBIIIMINGOFFGLLL PALO ALTO. CAOFDRNM KENXEM O. LARBEIL Ceq. DI R ECTOR OF BUILDING AND HOUSING CHUU VIRTA CALIFOMA DAHR NIODP Cao. CCDEBADMURSTRATCR ROIMD L..BE.. CAUX OHECTON OFINRPECoCNS MAPLE GAI MIXNESOTA ALAX P. onsoo, R.A,. RBA A$$ISTAMCEVE IEM SERVCES ORECIUR PHaENIK.MIMIN.A uRNY W. RICTNRW, CaC BUnDING Sal DIRE. GLENWLE. ARII RAWOW.BMULLER,CBC "OREGTgR. BUILDING DEP.AMMENT NEW WHr OEACH.C.WFORNIA ROFK. WATTS, CB.O. OIIEF OF BUBDINO NSPECTILW S BUILDING BAFETVDIVISIDN ANCHOH,A-E... BKMMEES OFFICIAL SMLWATER. MIXNESOTA FAX MUM M AemmlWNan RSIRBGAY, SARAY, 13101 Go 21ME IOBOES. Irc. OUSEI pMo PIEV Y. (310).23659 PIBn RI - 00)US3A28 IMIw (317 8r;Eoeee Mull (3161)tl-00>5 Nal CWI (5101AEM132B6 T (5181 XHEIS ANUNNI USSR 63)3936 BUILDING DEC 15 1994 December 13, 1994 Plan Check: 6977 Project: Chrismphilis Condos Address: 504 Holly Drive Sprinkler Plan Check Jeannine Graf City of Edmonds Building Official 250 5th Ave. NE Edmonds, WA 98020 Dear Ms. Graf: OFFICES OF JENNYA BARBERA. F.E. REGIONAL MANAGER IUTNLEEN CURRY, R.E REGIONAL ENGINEER JAMES E. REF SING, P.E., S.E. REGIONAL ENGINEER CNARLEBJ. WILLUMS,RE.,S.E SENIOR REGIONAL ENGINEER The automatic sprinkler system plans and calculations submitted by Advanced Fire Protection and stamped/sealed by Michael Balsey for the above named facility do not comply with the Uniform Building code standard 38-3/NFPA 13R. The following items should be corrected and plans and calculations resubmitted for review. 1. Sprinklers in the steeply pitched ceiling areas of the 3rd level living rooms are blocked (obswcted) by the ceiling ridge in accordance with Central Sprinkler Residential Sprinkler Installation Guide, Figure 4 and Figure 10. Additional sprinklers should be provided to provide complete coverage with heads located in accordance with the above noted Installation Guide. 2. Calculations should be corrected to accurately reflect the proper equivalent lengths for the CPVC plastic fittings. For example a In elbow should be 7' of equivalent footage, not the 2' used in calculations- 3. An additional sprinkler head should be added in Master Bedroom 308 and the other head relocated to maintain a maximum distance of 8' from adjacent walls. (See room 201). 4. Heads should be located below intermediate stair landings. Main Of ice: 5360 Workman Mill Road B Whinier, California 90601-2298 W i3101699-0541 . Plan Check: 6977 Jeannine Graf, City of Edmonds December 13, 1994 Page 2 5, The 1st floor living room 206 has sprinkler spacing greater than 16' by 16'. A four head calculations should be provided with a minimum flow from those heads exceeding 8' from walls of 16 GPM each. 6. Sprinkler coverage in rooms living room 228 and dining room 227 is improper. The area adjacent to the storage room in right hand corner is not adequately protected. Our other comments are: 7. The building is only partially sprinklered. Sprinkler protection had been omitted from all of the 1st floor (use is not shown), 2nd floor parking areas and exterior decks, the 3rd floor office and lavatory areas, bathrooms less than 55 square feet, small closets without heat producing devices (less than 24 square feet), elevator shafts, the mechanical room and all combustible blind spaces. The omission of these areas should be approved by the City of Edmonds. The combined domestic/fire underground supply to the sprinkler systems is noted by Advanced Fire Protection is not part of their scope of work. 8. Verification of NFPA 13R/UBC Standard 38-3 system should be provided with City of Edmonds. Standard building construction trade-offs allowed for fully sprinklered buildings should not be allowed with the submitted system. 9. Verification should be made that the Sprinkler risers/controls should be located in an accessible location. 10. The location of the Fire Department Connection should be approved by the Fire Department. 11. Insulation protecting wet pipe sprinklers from exposure to attic should be adequately secured in place to prevent piping from freezing. 12. Control valves on 1 1/4" double check valve should be supervised in accordance with NFPA 13R 2-4-1-1. 13. You should verify that water supplies (shown below) used in hydraulic calculations are available. Static - 105 PSI Residual - 56 PSI Flowing - 1256 GPM Plan Check: 6977 Jeannine Graf, City of Edmonds December 13, 1994 Page 3 Our headquarters accounting department in Whittier, California will send you an invoice for this plan reviewing service based on two hours of professional time ($150.00). I am returning all data and plans to you. However, to facilitate the plan review process, I am sending a copy of this list directly to the designer. If you wish me to do the recheck, please instruct them to REVISE THE PLANS and specifications, and RESUBMIT them with a letter that indicates which sheet or detail the corrections may be found, and to return the check prints. Please feel free to contact me if there are any questions. Very truly yours, Charles J. Williams, S.E. Regional Engineer pkw Enclosed NOTICE TO PERMITTEE AND/OR OWNER a PARTIAL APPROVAL Inc 18g0 0 VIOLATION a CORRECTIONS REQUIRED Permit Number Gi? oZ Owner lob Address GJU4- FiP.i�t,+-1 O NO PERMIT -STOP WORK -REMOVE CONSTRUCTION OR OBTAIN PERMIT AND MAKE WORK COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE CITY CODES. OCONSTRUCTION IS NOT IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPROVED PLANS AND PERMIT - STOP WORK. MAKE WORK COMPLY WITH APPROVED PLANS AND PERMIT OR REMOVE. STOP WORK - UNTIL AUTHORIZED TO CONTINUE BY CITY INSPECTOR. r" CORRECTIONS LISTED BELOW MUST BE MADE: BEFORE WORK CAN BE APPROVED AND/OR THE NEXT PHASE IS STARTED; TO AVOID POSTING OF A STOP WORK ORDER, ORDER TO CORRECT, OR ABATEMENT PROCESS. aJOB CARD MUST BE POSTED ON SITE AND BE VISIBLE FROM STREET. APPROVED PLANS MUST BE AVAILABLE TO INSPECTOR ON SITE. DWORK DESCRIBED BELOW HAS BEEN INSPECTED AND IS APPROVED. aCONTACT INSPECTOR AND ARRANGE FOR APPOINTMENT. ORECALL FOR INSPECTION. MA42rgg /0'-N ME h� ZIJaa o0 Z OUt% gym gaffic ONYNA �ya.r Pia 7�y_laa oU THE ACTIONS OR CORRECTIONS INDICATED ABOVE ARE REQUIRED WITHIN *--':-ft�DAYS OR PENALTIES MAY BE APPLIED. FOR INSPECTIONS CALL 771-0220. OBuilding Division OPlanning Department %Q*T Engineering Department aFire Department CITY OF EDMONDS 641 X F ✓ Inspector 6-27 Date FIRE DEPARTMENT PERMIT REVIEW TO: Gary McComas - Tom VonSchuessler FROM: Sharon Nolan Permit Coordinator DATE: /�?-aIy%�4 PLANCHECKN: 9y ,20�) 1-MIT i ! . LI ._ ❑ For initial review & comment ❑ For review- see ICBO letter RESPONSE FROM FIRE DEPT. Approved for issuance ❑ Send to ICBO for review Resubmitted plans for review ❑ See attached corrections\ send copy to applicant ❑ Return resubmitted plans to fire for re -check COMMENTS: RECEIVED DEG 2 2 1994 EDMONDS FIRE DEPT. CITY OF EDMONDS 250 -5TH AVE. N.. EDMONDS. WA 98020 . 12061 rr1-0220 . FAX 120611r1.0221 COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Public Works • Planning • Parksann Recreation . Engineering LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL Date: / Z— j q— yy To:Jf%/Gf/pEL �/LSCEy �y� ProjecC�E S?A!Au K(. Plan review number: Address:SaC(L�/ �tQ Transmitting: Plans & Cales Soils Report Other 6z� ,ter Letter Dated I,,'— —/& —T For your information: Comments: As requested by your office For structural plan review: LAURA M. HALL MAYOR For non-structural plan review: For Washington State Energy Code review: For Barrier Free review: - For Fire Code review: Note attached comments: For Corrections and resubmitted: - Building Division Respond to letter in writing: Resubmit 2 revised plans: City Official Send directly to City Building Division: • Incorporated August 11. 1890 e Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan Y:........................................................... RECeIVED JUL 1 8 ISt4 V July 18, 1994 PEEPJiIT CCU(:TEI BMdddmgn Gnup 400 DV. Edmrds, 9hfli"n 98020 70677AS64 Jeannine Graf Building Official City of Edmonds 250-5th Ave. N. Edmonds, WA 98020 RE: Plan Check - 6977 Recheck Hl Project: Christophilis Dear Ms. Graf I have included the following corrections to the ICBO Review dated July 8, 1994. Hopefully we have covered these items to your satisfaction. Our goal is to receive a building permit this week. Type Of Construction - Apartment type sprinklers will be provided throughout condo units, garages, and corridors - "=fhataffect condo exits. 4. One hour ceiling -roof assemblies. See enclosed data sheet. NER Report 200, Assembly E-6. 6. Beams and columns at tenant space to have one hour protection. „A Exterior wood columns (covered in structural notes). 17. Windows adjacent to doors. 105 and 202 to have safety glazing. 19. Fire blocking shown on sheet V. Typical section at grid 4 (typical for grids 1, 2, 3, 4,'5, & 6). 22. Roof system will be sloped a minimum of %4" per foot. 4�surp In e B u�° FIRE DEPARTMENT PERMIT REVIEW TO: Gary McComas Tom VonSchuessler FROM: Sharon Nolan Permit Coordinator DATE: PLAN CHECK # : 9y o?c3U RECEIVED PROJECT: o E 9 15 1994 EMIOND.S EIRE DES, For initial review & comment For review- see ICBO letter DEPT. ❑ Approved for issuance ❑ Send to ICBO for review ❑ Resubmitted plans for review ❑ See attached corrections\ send copy to applicant ® Return resubmitted plans to fire for recheck COMMENTS: t � -�•. >r��` �A �av ice- t,' �e i�'�ac� /t `�—� S('{Z-tuk�E�R.•l tic Pam. 3i vzo-�occx�. T�\qrf- �0K 44 rz 6C- I +l i IE, Fire Mcial : Date : a'UBMITTAI_ SERIAL NOe202 CHRISTOPHILIS CONDO 504 LLY DRIVE EDMONDS 2nd FLOOR (5)hd CALC IN THE CORRIDOR •'_19-.199: PA.5E 1 FLOW TEST RESULTS Water Suoply STATIC 105.00 PSI RESDIUAL 56.00 PSI C 1256.00 GPM CITY PRESSURE AVAILABLE AT 105.3 GPM 104.50 PSI SUMMARY OF SPRINKLER OUTFLOWS ACTUAL MINIMUM SPR FLOW FLOW K_FACTOR PRESSURE 124 13.71 12.00 4.30 10.16 125 13.81 12.00 4.30 10.32 126 12.21 12.00 4.30 8.06 127 12.00 12.00 4.30 7.79 128 18.52 12.00 4.30 18.55 TOTAL WATER REQUIRED FOR SYSTEM 70.25 GPM OUTFLOWS AT 2 35.00 GPM TOTAL WATER REQUIREMENT 105.25 GPM PRESSURE REQUIRED AT O 71.51 PSI MAXIMUM PRESSURE UNBALANCE IN LOOPS 0.09 PSI MAXIMUM VELOCITY IN PIPES 23.33 FPS RECE71VED DEC 2 1 1994 PERMIT COUNTER CITY copy SUBMITTAL SERIAL NO:2(12 4 -.)n._�gc;�q nnnr - CHRISTOPHILIS CONDO 504 LLY DRIVE EDMONDS 2nd FLOOR (5)hd CALC IN THE CORRIDOR FROM TO FLOW DIAM EQUIV P-LOSS PRESSURE GPM IN PIPE PSI/Ft SUMMARY LEN/Ft PSI 27 127 1.109 L 0.50 0..02.S5 PT 7.79 (127) Q 12.00 F=E F 2.00 PH --0,22 DR C150 T 2." PF 0.06 22 27 1. 109 L 12.00 0.0255 FT 7.671 ( 27) Q 12.00 F=T F 5.00 PE 0.00 8N C150 T 17.00 PF 0.43 PT 8.06 ( 22) ------------------ 28 128 1.109 L 0.50 0.0570 PT 18.55 (128) Q 19.52 F=E F 2.00 PE -0.22 DR C150 T 2.50 PF 0.14 8 28 1.1.09 L 18.00 0.0570 PT 18.47 ( 28) Q 18.52 F=2T,E F 12.00 PE 0.00 BN C150 T 30.00 PF 1.71 PT 20.1.8 ( B) ------------------ 25 125 1.109 L 0.50 0.0331 PT 10.32 (125) Q 13.81 F=E F 2.00 PE -0.2.2 DR C150 T 2.50 PF 0.08 23 25 1.109 L 5.00 0.0331 PT 10.18 ( 25) Q 13.81 F=T F 5.00 PE 0.00 BN C150 T 10.00 PF 0.33 PT 10.51 ( 23) ------------------ 24 124 1.109 L 0.50 0.0327 PT 10.16 (124) 0 13.71 F=E F 2.00 PE -0.22 DR C150 T 2.50 PF 0.08 23 24 1,109 L 10.00 0.0327 PT 10.02 ( 24) Q 13.71 F=T F 5.00 PE 0.00 BN C150 T 15.00 PF 0.49 20 23DO 13.81 1.109 L 13.00 0.1185 PT 10.51 ( 23) Q 27.52 F=T F 5.00 PE 0.00 BN 0150 T 18.00 PF 2.13 PT 12.64 ( 20) ------------------ 26 126 1.109 L 0.50 0.0264 PT B.06 (126) Q 12.21 F=E F 2.00 PE -0.22 DR C150 T 2.50 PF 0.07 22 26 1.109 L 1..00 0.0264 F? 7.91 ( 26) Q 12.21 F=T F 5.00 PE 0.00 BN C1.50 T 6.00 PF 0.16 1 41 •SUBMITTAL SERIAL ND:202-W CHRISTOPHILIS CONDO 504 HOLLY DRIVE EDMONDS 2nd FLOOR (5)hd CALC IN THE CORRIDOR OL-19-1994 PAGE .3 FROM TO FLOW DIAM EQUIV P-LOSS PRESSURE GPM IN PIPE PSI/Ft SUMMARY LEN/Ft PSI 21 22DO 12.00 1.109 L 14.00 0.0935 PT 8.07 ( 22) Q 24.21 F=T F 5.00 PE 0.00 BN C150 T 19.0n PF 1.79 20 21. 1.109 L 21.00 0.0935 PT 9.85 ( 21) Q 24.21 F=T.2E F 9.00 PE 0.00 BN C150 T 30.00 PF 2.B1 6 20DO 27.52 1.109 L 13.00 0.3811 PT 12.66 ( 20) Q 51.73 F=T F 5.00 PE 0.00 BN C150 T 20.00 PF 7..62 7 BDQ 18.52 1.109 L 9.00 0.6713 PT 20.28 ( 8) Q 70.25 F=E F 2.00 PE 3.90 NC C.150 T 11.00 PF 7.38 5 7 1.109 L 10.00 0.6713 PT .31.56 ( 7) Q 70.25 F=2E F 4.00 PE 0.00 NC C150 T 14.00 PF 9.40 2 5 1.468 L B.50 0.2588 PT 40.96 ( 5) 0 70.25 F=DDC.4E F 40.00 PE 3.25 FR C120 T 48.50 PF 12.55 COMMENT: DDC = 1.25 DOUBLE BACKFLOW 0 2DQ 35.00 2.009 L 30.00 0.0785 PT 56.76 ( 2) 0 105.25 F=T,2GV,RPV/6E F 159.00 PE 0.00 UN C150 T 189.00 PF 14.84 COMMENT: RPV = 2 METER PT 71.60 ( 0) MAXIMUM PRESSURE UNBALANCE IN LOOPS 0.09 PSI MAXIMUM VELOCITY IN PIPES 23.33 FPS - SUBMITTAL SERIAL NO:2022•4 CHRISTOPHILIS CONDO 504 HOLLY DRIVE EDMONDS 3rd FLOOR (4)hd CALC FLOW TEST RESULTS Water SUPPIV STATIC 105.00 PSI RESDIUAL 56.00 PSI @ 1256.00 GPM CITY PRESSURE AVAILABLE AT 88.0 GPM 104.64 SUMMARY OF SPRINKLER OUTFLOWS ACTUAL MINIMUM SPR FLOW FLOW K-FACTOR PRESSURE --- 115 ---- 14,95 ---- 12.00 -------- 4.30 ---`--- 12.09 117 12.51 12.00 4.30 8.46 118 13.56 12.00 4.30 9.94 119 12.00 12.00 4.30 7.79 TOTAL WATER REQUIRED FOR SYSTEM 53.01 GPM OUTFLOWS AT 2 35.00 GPM TOTAL WATER REQUIREMENT 88.01 GPM PRESSURE REQUIRED AT 0 90.09 PSI MAXIMUM PRESSURE UNBALANCE IN LOOPS 0.09 PSI MAXIMUM VELOCITY IN PIPES 17.61 FPS 12-19 1994 PAGE 1 RSMIVEE) DEC 2 1 1994 PERP,fjg COUNTER SUBMIT-rAL SERIAL NO:2022HY4 12-19-1994 PAGE CHRISTOPHILIS CONDO 504 HOLLY DRIVE EDMONDS 3rd FLOOR (4)hd CALC FROM TO FLOW DIAM EOUIV P-LOSS PRESSURE GPM IN PIPE PSI/Ft SUMMARY LEN/Ft PSI 19 119 1.109 L 0.50 0.0255 PT 7.79 (1.1.9) 0 12.00 F=T F 5.00 PE -0.22 DR C150 T 5„50 PF 0.14 1B 19 1.109 L 13.00 0.0255 PT 7.71 ( 19) 0 12.00 F=3E F 6.00 PE 1.73 BN C1.50 T 19.00 PF 0.48 PT 9.92 ( 1S) --------------------- IS 118 1.109 L 0.50 0.0320 PT 9.94 (118) 0 13.56 F=T F 5.00 PE -0.22 DR 0150 T 5.50 PF 0.18 16 18DO 12.00 1.109 L 7.00 0.1034 PT 9.90 ( 1.8) 0 25.56 F=0 F 0.00 PE 0.00 BN C.150 T 7.00 PF 0.72 PT 10.62 ( 16) ------------------ 17 117 1.109 L 0.50 0.0276 PT 8.46 (117) O 12.51 F=T F 5.00 PE -0.22 DR C.150 T 5.50 PF 0.15 16 17 1.109 I_ 10.00 0.0276 PT 8.39 ( 17) .. 0 12.51 F=T,2E F 9.00 PE 1.7.3 - BN C150 T 19.00 PF 0.52 15 16DO 25.56 1.109 L 7.00 0.2160 PT 10.64 ( 16) 0 -78.06 F=0 F 0.00 PE 0.00 ' BN C150 T 7.00 PF 1.51 PT 12.15 ( 15) ------------------- 15 115 1.109 L 0.50 0.0383 PT 12.09 (115) 0 14.95 F=T F 5.00 PE -0.22 DR C150 T 5.50 PF 0.21 14 15DO 38.06 1.109 L 11.00 0.3967 PT 12.08 ( 15) ' 0 53.01 F=T F 5.00 PE 0.00 BN C150 T 16.00 PF 6.38 11 14 1.109 L 41.00 0.3937 PT 18.46 ( 14) 0 53.01 F=T,2E F 9.00 PE 0.00 NC C150 T 50.00 PF 19.93 10 11 1.109 L 9.00 0.3987 PT 38.39 ( 1.1) 0 53.01 F=2E F 4.00 PE 0.00 NC C150 T 13.00 PF 5.18 ' . i i i SUBMITTAL SERIAL NO:2022HY4 12-19-1994 PAGE :3 CHRISTOPHILIS CONDO 504 HOLLY DRIVE EDMONDS 3rd FLOOR (4)hd CALC FROM TO FLOW DIAM EOUIV P-LOSS PRESSURE GPM IN PIPE PSI/Ft SUMMARY LEN/Ft PSI 7 10 1.109 L 1.8.00 0.39B7 PT 43.57 ( 10) 0 53.01 F=2E F 4.00 PE 7.79 NC C150 T 22.00 PF 8,77 5 7 1.109 L 10.00 0.3927 PT 60.13 ( 7) O 53.01 F=2E F 4.00 PE 0.00 NC C150 T 14.00 PF 5.53 2 5 1.469 L 8.50 0.1537 PT 65.71 ( 5) O 53.01 F=DDC,4E F 52.00 PE 3.25 FR C120 T 60.50 PF 9.30 COMMENT: DDC = 1.25 DOUBLE BACKFLOW 0 2D0 35.00 2.009 L 30.00 0.0564 PT 78.26 ( 2) 0 88.01 F=T,26V,RP'V/6E F 178.00 PE 0.00 UN C150 T 203.00 PF 11.73 COMMENT: RP'V = 2 METER PT 89.99 ( 0) MAXIMUM PRESSURE UNBALANCE IN LOOPS 0.09.PSI MAXIMUM VELOCITY IN PIPES 17.61 FPS 14 A �VANCED FIRE PROTECTION INC. A WASHINGTON CORPORATION CITY OF EDMONDS BUILDING OFFICIAL 250 5TH AVE. N.E. 'EDMONDS WA 98020 P.O. Box 1543 • 19738 - 1441h Ave. N.E. (206) 483-5657 Woodinville, Washington 98072 800: 239-3477 FAX: 483-5077 12-20-94 RECEIVED Rl%EC 2 1 464 DPERMIT COATER PER, _ . , I SUBJECT: RESPONSE TO I.C.B.O.'S PLAN REVIEW RE CHRISTOPHILIS CONDOS This letter is in response to I.C.B.O.'S plan review for Christophilis Condos dated 12-13-94. ITEM 0 RESPONSE 1. I have added (2) Heads in living room 309 and 316 to meet Centrals installation guide, figure 4. 2. The calculations are correct. The proper equivalent lengths for the CPVC Pipe have been used. See Sheet 2 of 3 for Central's equivalent feet of Pipe table. 3. An additional Sprinkler Head has been added in master bedroom 308. 4. There are Sprinkler Heads on the intermediate stair landing to the exits. 5. A Sprinkler Head was added in living room, 206 to keep the spacing under 16'x 16'. - -6.- - The Sprinkler Heads in rooms 227 and 228 were re- positioned to provide adequate protection. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call. Sincerely, ADVANCED FIRE PROTECTION, INC. Mike Balsley System Designer/Project Manager MB-cm E. 1606 Holyoke #8 • Spokane, Washington 99207 12013 N.E. 99th St. #1680 • Vancouver, Washington 98682 Spokane: Bellingham: Vancouver: (509)489-5040 (206)738-8081 (206)896-3650 800: 489-5044 800: 239-3477 800: 260-9701 FAX: 489-5044 FAX: 8%-3649 08/15/90 n8:03 FAX 206 64998LOVELL SAUERLIND »-BU'TTERF.IELD ® 002 y .... i sV E BYDRAt3LIC PROJECT OEPARTNENT OF'YIULIFE lives i 600 WITOL WY Y- APPROVAL OLTIPIA YASMINGTON 98501-1091 C'c[� W i',:'r C.W. 75.20.1C10) cm) M-589T �ftwli 75.20. 103) August 10 1994 (applicant sha.Ld refer tR This &11 1O ell correspo._.' STREET FILE-- PAGE 1 OF 1 PUB ' �APPLI CART NAME 1g <n11TAGT PNgiE(5) 206 775-1591 �CgITROL NUMBER 01=94587-01❑ Lovell-Sauerland fi Assoc. VRIA Q STREET OR RURAL R010E 19400 - 33rd Ave. W. ATTN: Crai Cam bell 08.0010 CI 2IP STATE 98036 14951 15 37 L nnwood - TRIBUTARY TO TYPE PRO.IECT WATER - Management Q30UARTER SECTION TOWNSHIP RANGE(E•W --Ld1NTY 27N SECTION NW 25 - ____03E __Snohomish _ I IT ILET 1995 LIMITATIONS• OTNIS PROJECT MAY BEGIN ©AOotob TIME Au st 8 1994 THIS APPROVAL IS TO BE AVAILARLE ON THE JOB St IE AT ALL TIMES ANO ITS PROVtSi ONS FOLLOWED ff THE FRNIME A9 OPERATOR PERFWHING THE WORK. SEE IMPORTANT GENERAL.PROVISIONS ON REVERSE SIDE THAT ARE ALSO PART OF THIS APPROVAL. Project Description- Install stormwater control and outfall system and connect it to an existing catch -basin. 1. Retention\detention facilities shall conform to City of Edmonds specifications. 2. Erosion control methods shall be establiphed.prioi to the start be as necessary of this work. Erosion controls shall maintained to assure that no dirt or sediments enter the stream. 3. All earth areas adjacent to the watercourse which :are exposed or to be with suitable vegeta- disturbed by this project are planted tive cover to prevent.erosion and to protect fish :life. 4. .Extreme careshall be taken to assure no ,deleterious material fresh cement 'concrete lime, petroleum 'products, . such as chemicals, silt, etc.; Le allowed to enter the water. 5. The retention/detention facilities shall be cleaned of sand, silt or other debris before releasing stormwater to the system. LOCATION: The southeast corner of 5th Ave. S. and Molly Dr., Edmonds. jkd ,,,,DNS, City of Edmonds, May 1992 HABITAT BIOLOGIST: Tony oppermann (206) 775-1311, ext. 109 ., AGENT:Hendricks P3 APPLICANT - FISHERIES - AGENT T. INVESTIGATOR - REGION - OLYMPIA. DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE DIRECTOR �jW'.y i 1 �• I 6iiT�\�/O- L.allo�cap�µc �Ca��cao C, I MA CITY OF EDMONDS 250-5TH AVE. N.• EDMONDS, INA 98020•(206) 271-0220 FAX (206)221-0221 i COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT 11 90 Public Works • Planning Parks and Recreation • Engineering BgD. t9 June 20, 1995 Brad Butterfield 400 Dayton Street Edmonds, Washington 98020 Dear Brad: LAURA M. HALL .A108 This letter is a follow-up to the phone conversations I had with your staff last week. The City will remove and replace the street trees that presented a sight distance hazard at no cost to the property owner. Parks crews removed the trees last Friday. Once the owner is available, we can discuss the species of tree to be replaced. Please contact me at 771-0220 if you have any questions. Sincerely, e'. s JAMES C. WALKER, PE City Engineer JCW/cmc c: Gordy Hyde John Bissell ED96CHRS.DOC • Incorporated August 11, 1890 Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan CITY OF EDMONDS LAURA M. HALL 250-5TH AVE. N.. EDMONDS. WA 98D20'•(2061771-0220 • FAX (as) 771-0221 MAYOR COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT 90 Public Works • Planning . Parks and Recreation • Engineering 99019 June 20, 1995 Brad Butterfield 400 Dayton Street Edmonds, Washington 98020 SUBJECT yHiRii4�TinPHIi �i91B li'T "DING -D96" Dear Brad: This letter is a follow-up to the phone conversations I had with your staff last week. The City will remove and replace the street trees that presented a sight distance hazard at no cost to the property owner. Parks crews removed the trees last Friday. Once the owner is available, we can discuss the species of tree to be replaced. Please contact me at 771-0220 if you have any questions. Sincerely, JAMES C. WALKER, PE City Engineer JCW/cmc C:. Gordy Hyde. John Bissell ED95CNRS.DOC • lmorporated August 11, 1890 Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan City of ,Edmoni RIGHT-OF-WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT Permit Number. .,1.. Issue Date: A. Address or Vicinity of Construction: 504-Melly OF, E9307303 ) 8 go 19 q B. Type of Work (be specific): lmatal l Ne, Service - C. Contractor. Contact: 8sank Seas Mailing Address: Phone: 4A7-7,28A State License #: 98203 Liability losunnce: 1 Bond: $ D. Building Permit # (if applicable): Side Sewer Permit # (if applicable): E. ❑ Commercial ❑ Subdivision ❑ City Project ® Utility (PUD, GTE, WNG, CABLE, WATER) ❑ Multi -Family ❑ Single Family ❑ Other INSPECTOR: INSPECTOR: F. Pavement or Concrete Cut: ❑ Yes ®No G. Sire of Cut: _ x _ H. Charge -$ APPLICANT TO READ AND SIGN s INDEMNITY: ApplievnluMerefondevMby hie eigwNre Nthis applies[ion, agree¢ to ho(Jthe CityofEdmoMeharM�s/rom lNiirlae, damagea,or chum of any hind or deecriptton whatsoever, foreseen or un/nressen, MW may be made agahvt'the City of Edoo M , w aoy o/ Re dewfo,.WH or employees, mottotina ornot(nUM to Ne do! eofany(egW➢roraedu,geincloding defense mste, andattorne,, a byreoeono/ypantu,aWecermR. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WORKMANSHIP AND MATERIALS P(9R,0(P�ERIOD OF ONE YEAR L/LOWING, THE FINAL INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK ESTIMATED RESTORATION FEES'W ; BE HELD C,NTIL TH -FINAL STdtA'ET PATCH IS COMPL ETRO RY CITY FORCE$ AT WHICH TIME A DEBIT OR CREDIT WILL REPROCESSED MR ISSUANCE TO THE APPLICANT. Construction drawing of proposed work required with permit application. A 24 hour notice is required for inspection; Please call the Engineering Division, 771-0220. Work and material is to be inspected during progress and at completion. Restoration is to be in accordance with City Codes. Street shall be kept clean at all times. Traffic Control Bud Public Safety shall be in accordance with City regulations asrequired by the City Engineer. All streetcut ditches shall be patched with asphalt or City approved material prior to the end of the working day; NO EXCEPTIONS. I have read the above statements and understand thepermit requirements and the pink copy of thepermit will be available on site.at all time or inspection purposes. Signature: Date: 12-30-94 ctor Or n CALL DIAL A -DIG PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK FOR CITY USE ONLY APPROVED BY: Is jL JLyl'1 np RIGHT OF WAY DEPOSIT TIME AUTHORIZED: VOID AFTERDAYS DISRUPTION FEE/FUND 111: SPECIAL CONDITIONS: RESTORATION FEE: - /-" PERMITFEE: �• TOTAL FEE: COMMENTS: f:I aNa19:1]I%rA DATE: ISSUED BY: NO WORK SHALL BEGIN PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE (soa. nm.:ss: N C40 • F M9Y�gYTfM[Jy Cfi,RTN Addendum to: City of Edmonds Hight of Way permit Application Submitted by: Marianne Kingsbury Engineering Aide umshington Natural Gas 1356-7500 X7596 Hol_L.ky DP �rrS 15� +-(oLL4 "blZ WNG to window Key: -Y- Water Watermain depth i.LG. -G- Gas Unknown -SS- Sewer tt/ -. Water hydrant gas main p Water valve Washington Natural Gas Company 1122 75th Street S.W.. Everett, Washington 98203, (206)355-3331 94*9®60556 Gov' 5�� STREET FILE LANDSCAPE AND STREAM pR\G`Np� p �ZURS pEF�pE PROTECTIVE EASEMENT ppUNr In the matter of the commercial development of the Christophilis property located at the southeast comer of 5th Avenue S. and Holly Drive in the City of Edmonds, KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that ANASTASIOS CHRISTOPHIL.IS, owner and developer (hereinafter referred to as "Grantor"), for and in consideration of benefits to be mutually received and other valuable considerations, does hereby grant, warrant and convey unto the GRANTEE, THE CITY OF EDMONDS, a municipal corporation of the State of Washington, (hereinafter referred to as the "Grantee"), a permanent easement over the area within 15 feet of the - top of the stream bank on both sides of the stream on the site to preserve and protect the stream and native plants from impacts of development. The landscaped protection easement shall not preclude maintenance and planting of native species plants and trees and removal of non-native or diseased plant species as approved by the City of Edmonds Architectural Design Board, or the installation of necessary utilities over, under and across said easement as may be approved for the operation of said development. Dated this r� day of J'=Ptrm� 199 `�. t:..1-7 Anastasios Christophilis, Owner/D veloper pe STATE OF R'ASHINGI'ON / SS. COUNTY OF ) On this day personally appeared before me_ &A'144t,24ta- to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that fro _ signed the same as iud free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and ,purposes .therein mentioned. GIVEN my hand and official seal this 6 day of_ 199,. Notary Public in r and for the State of Washington, in residing it.. »� �RANKIER u t1t5 • Ewreii. W+eM1inpan B820.t QTHE ER OF CASHIER'S CHECK �l 1' •� I iv FRONTi 6e"2 ,:I, F CHAISTOPHILIS " rreR B PARKING SPACES BI_ 2316 arcs RP atc.. ... _. . r 209152 wm SEPTEHEER 2 1994 SWrvATUVE n• 209 15 2110 1: & 25 &076 261:3153"v 2170171)1 0) Anastasios G. Christophilis FIRSTCHofCE'GOLD 3111 m Vouta A. ChristopLflis . m 17017 ralba Rd (aoe) 77s-s354 . . .Eaaoaa. WA eaoas 9-G _ iv�tL Iest $ y337 a ®BEAFiRsreANlf - ��e_ auo.c Valued Client Score 1987 '�ZY 31 L'i •� .. 08/15i90 08: 00 FAX 20W2 .7998 LOTELL SAUERL.ANDW EUTTERFIELO IM002 REcr-IVEC1 r^ HYDRAULIC PROTECT DEPARTMW OF:YIIDLIFE AUG 1 5 ica4 40 CAPITOL WAY N. APPROVAL : OLYIPIA WASHINGTON 98901-TOU1 PERMIT COUNTER aw. 7520.100) f2Db) 7s3•se97 3C2W. 75..20-103) r4 AUgUISt 10 1994 (apPL(cent should refer to this late mall correcpP,rdencU .:' PAGE , OF _ 1 PAGES > STREET FILE. �HTACT PHONE(S). EO APPLICANT NAME - GJ 206 775-1591 CONTROL NUMBER 1❑ - . O1r94587-01❑ Lovell-Sauerland fi ASSOC. ualA ly STREET OR RURAL ROUTE 19400 - 33rd Ave. W. ATTN: Craig'Cam bell QE•QOSO CITT ZIP STATE 98036 ,A 95 15 37 L nnwoed TRIOUT T i0 ::- I7. TYPE ^OF PROJECT Z UAT ER ,', ., Management ©QUARTER SECTION TOWNSHIP' -' RANGE(E-N) COUNTY 27N 03E __Snobomish _ SECnoNNW _25 ^__, ___ S�THIS PROJECT MAY BEGIN ©AND MUST 8E COMPLETED BY October 1 1995 TIME LIMITATIONS• Au st 8, 1994 THIS APPROVAL IS TO BE AVAVLAALCOR THE JOB SITE AT ALL TIMES AND ITS PROVISIWe FOLLOWED By THE PFRMITTEE AW-DDFRATdI PERPORMIMG THE. WRK. SEE IMPORTANT GENERAL,PROVISIONS ON REVERSE SI➢E TEAT ARE ALSO PART OFTHIS APPROVAL. project Description: Install stormwater control and outfall system and connect it to an existing catch -basin. 1. Retention\detention facilities shall conform to Cityof Edmonds specifications. 2. Erosion control methods shall be establiphed.prioi to the start be as necessary of this work. Erosion controls shall maintained dirt or enter the stream. to assure that no sediments _ 3. All earth areas adjacent to thewatercourse which a e ei(posed- or tobe,;planted with suitable vegeta- disturbed by this.- project are to prevent, erosion and to:protect fish life. tive cover 4. .Extreme czre shall:be taken to assure no deleterious,, material fresh cement concrete lime, petroleum "products; such as chemicals, silt, etC..; ISe allowed to -enter the water.- 5. The retention/detention facilities shall be cleangd of -sand, silt or other debris before releasing, stormwater to the system. , LOCATION: The southeast corner4:of Sth Ave. S. and Holly Dr., Edmonds., 7kd SEPA,DNS, City of Edmonds, -May 1992 775-1311,ext.-. 109 HABITAT BIOLOGIST: Tony Oppermamn . (206) _ AGENT: Hendricks P3 APPLICANT - FISHERIES - AGENT - 'INVESTIGATOR - REGION - OLY'MPIA: DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE DIRECTOR Uo/Iu/Uu U8: 04 FAX 206 7998 LOVELL SAUERLAND BUTTERFIELD i THIS APPROVAL IS TO BE AVAILABLE ON THE JOB SITE AT ALL TINES AND ITS PROVISIONS FOLLOWED BY THE PERMITTEE AND OPERATOR PERFORMING THE WORK THE PERSON(S) TO WHOM THIS APPROVAL IS ISSUED MAY BE HELD LIABLE FOR ANY LOSS OR DAMAGE TO FISH LIFE OR FISH HABITAT WHICH RESULTS FROM FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH. THE PROVISIONS OF.THIS APPROVAL. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THIS APPROVAL COULD RESULT IN A CIVIL. PENALTY OF UP 'TO ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS PER DAY OR A GROSS MISDEMEANOR CHARGE, POSSIBLY PUNISHABLE BY FINE OR IMPRISONMENT. ;ALL HYDRAULIC PROJECT APPROVALS ISSUED PURSUANT TO RCW 75,26.100 ARE .SUBJECT TO ADDITIONAL RESTRICTIONS, CONDITIONS, OR REVOCATION IF. THE DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND.WILDLIFE DETERMINES THAT NEW BIOLOGICAL OR PhYSICAA.' INFORMATION INDICATES.THE:N£ED-. FOR SUCH ACTION. THE PE HAS THE RIGHT PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 34. 04"'RCGi TO'APPEAL SUCH DECISIONS. ALL HYDRAULIC PROJEC'. APPROVALS ISSUED PURSUANT TO. RCW. 75:20.103 MAY BE MODIFIED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF FISH AI40. WILDLIFE DUE TO CONDITIONS AFTER CONSULTATION WITH. THE. PEAHITT^eE: PROVIDED, HOWEVER,THAT SUCH MODIFICATIONS SHALL BE SUBJECT TO APPEAL -To THE HYDRAULIC.APPEALS HOARD ESTABLISHED IN RCW 75.20.130. .THIS APPROVAL PERTAINS ONLY °TO'THEE PROVISIONS OP THE FISHERIES AND WILODIFP CODES. ADDITIONAL AUTHORI^ATION FROM OTHER PUBLIC AGENCIES MAY BE - NECESSARY FOR THIS PROJECT. APPEALS - GENERAL IF YOU WISH TO APPEAL DENIAL OR CONDITIONS OF FORMAL APPEAL PROCESSES AVAILABLE. A. INFORMAL APPEALS- - B. ARE INFO END r_ AN INFORMAL APPEAL (WAD 220-110-340) CONSISTS OF CONTACT NGT ' AREA. HABITAT BIOLOGIST AND DISCUSSING YOUR CONCERNS. MOST PROBLES ARE -RESOLVED AT THIS LEVEL,,BUT, IF NOT, YOU MAY ELEVATE YDUR CONCEENS TOTHEASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF THE HABITAT DIVISION IN OLYMPIA. THE HABITAT DIVISION 'ASSISTANT DIRECTOR'S ;DECISION SHALL BE APPROVED OR DISAPPROVED BY. THE DIRECTOR OR DESIGNEE. -IF YOU ARE NOT SATISFIED WITH THEIRESULTS OF THIS INFORMAL APPEAL, A FORMAL.APPEAL MAY BE FILED. FORMAL -APPEALS- i 1) FOR ALL CIVIL PENALTY APPEALS AND FOR OTHER; HPA APPEALS WHICH ARE: NOT ASSOCIATED WITH IRRIGATION OR STOCK -WATERING DIVERSIONS, A WRITTEN APPEAL REQUEST RUST BE FILED WITH THE DEPARTMENT THAT ISSUED, OR DENTED THE APPRO- VAL OR LEVIED THE CIVIL PENALTY YOU ARE APPEALING (WAC 220-110-350). ' 2) FOR APPEALS OF DENIAL OR CONDITIONS OF =AN:HPA ASSOCIATED'WITH IRRI- CATION OR STOCK -WATERING DIVERSIONS OTHER THAN CIVIL PENALTY'APPEALS BOARD PER WAG 259-04. TEE MAILING ADDRESS OF THE APPEALS BOARD IS: ENVIRONMENTAL HEARINGS OFFICE, BUILDING TWO��MOWE SIX, LACEYy WASHINGTON, - 99504) TELEPHONE (206) 4,59-6327: - _ 3) FAILURE TO APPEAL WITHIN '30 DAYS OF TFZM DATE OF ACTION YOU ARE PP$EAL- ING RESULTS IN FORFEITURE OF ALL XPPEA_; RIGHTS. 0003 SERMIT APPLICATION REQUIREMEN'%TREET FILE To: Applicant From: Lyle C�h�riisman, Engineering Inspector �- J Owner: L'.ylud7'Orp.�i/L! $ Plan Check No: Address: ,70s'4-C%G • Date: ti 6 7^ After review of the subject permit application, the following requirements must be met: 1. Construction hours are: WEEKDAYS — 7:00 A.M: 10:00 P.M. W EEKENDS/HOLIDAYS —10:00 A.M.6:00 P.M. 2. A separate RIGHT-OF-WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT is required for all work on public property. (ECDC 1&60) 3. Truck haul route plan must be submitted and approved prior to permit issuance. 4. Builder/owner is responsible for containing all temporary runoff and erosion control on site. (ECDC 1830.030d) 5. NO WORK SHALL BE DONE WITHIN 15 FEET OFSTREAMS OR 10 FEET FROM ANY CLOSED DRAINAGE FACILITY. BUILDER/OWNER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR IDENTIFYING CONDITIONS ON THE DRAWING. (ECDC 1830.50G) 6. FILTER FABRIC FENCE SHALL BE INSTALLED AND INSPECTED PRIOR TO CLEARING AND CONSTRUCTION. (ECDC I830) 7. INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED ON STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEMS, TIGHTLINES AND CATCH BASIN INSTALLATION. INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED PRIOR TO BACKFILLING. (ECDC 18.30) 8. Repair or replace all defective existing curb, gutter and sidewalk adjacent to the property. If an intersection is involved, a handicap ramp may be required. Contractor shall meet with the City Engineering stall to determine the extent of repair prior to issuance of the permit. (ECDC 18.90) 9. Driveway slope shall not exceed 14% without a waiver. Every attempt should be made to keep the slope below 14%. Waiver granted to %. (ECDC 18.80.060D) . 10. Driveways must be paved from property line to City RIGHT-OF-WAY. A separate permit is required. (ECDC 18.80.060C) 11. INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED ON DRIVEWAYS AND SIDEWALKS PRIOR TO AND AFTER POURING. (ECDC 18.30) 12. No burning of construction refuse without a permit from the Fire Department 13. Connection to City water system is required. There is a separate charge for the water meter. (ECDC 7.20) 14. A back water valve is required if downstairs plumbing is below the elevation of upstream manhole. (ECDC 7.20) 15. Water and sewer main lines should be separated by 10 feet minimum. (ECDC 18.10) I 16. Connection to the City sanitary system is required. A separate permit is required. LID# Fees paid: Yes No Ch"�e�� (ECDC 18.10) ,A""Zar- opkAze �Cs�t..- OIt Ib'iPILLr f�J7L. 17. Underground wiring is required on all new construction, and for additions, alterations, and repairs that exceed 50%ofthe total assessed value of the structure. (ECDC 18.90) 18. A FINAL ENGINEERING INSPECTION IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO THE BUILDING DIVISION GRANTING OCCUPANCY OF TIJE BUILDING OR STWggU�C�I' E. (ECDC 18.90) PRMTREQRDOT 1 o2v • !r;r�74 >,Wee� /5 / "5 014UR 7 Gwor ZA 4'aee' iat . .~98/15/90 08:03 F.{I 272 -7998 LO\ELL SAUERL.14- BIUMERFIELD - 1�002 y�E T ti HYDRAULIC PROJECT _ OEP!iAR T OF WILDLIFE 600 CAPITOL My IT. APPROVAL OLYMPIA WSNINGTON 98501-1071:.. (R.C.W: 75. 20 10 0 ) (206) 753-5E97 (R.C.W.7 5-. 20 103 ) rl _August 10, 1994 (applicant should refer to this date in all correspondence) < ,, PAGE I OF 1 PAGES fO APPLI CART Nµ: - Ig NTACT PNONE<S) OCONTROL NUMBER Love11-Sauerland F, Assoc. 206 775-1591 01=94587-01 19 STREET CR RURAL ROUTE -. 19400 - 33rd Ave. W. ATTN: Craig Campbell - 9❑ WRIA 08.0010 CITY `STATE ZIP Lynnwood •: WA..-. .::. :9$036 ,`: .. T495: �. T5 '.37 gWATER TRtSUTRRT TO IT : TTPE:OF PROJECT ,:` shy_ T l a({J,s rr•.k f„ -, Stormwa__ ' 13 QUARTER SECTION TOWNSHIP '' RANGE(E-W) "COUNTY SECTIORNW 25 - 27N 03E Snohomish ------ -i Management TIME LIMITATIONS: TNIS PROJECT NAY BEGIN ❑ 6 AND MUST BE COMPLETED BY October 1 1995 Au st 8 1994 THIS APPROVAL IS TO BE AVAILABLE ON THE JOR SITE AT ALL TIMES AND ITS PROVISIONS!FOLLONED BY THE PERMITTEE PAD OPERATOR PERFORMING THE LARK. SEE IMPORTANT OENERAL,PROVISIONS ON REVERSE SIDE THAT ARE ALSO PART OF THIS .APPROVAL. Project Description;. Install stormwater control and ouCfall system and connect it to an existing catch -basin.. . i 1. Retention\detention facilities shall conform to City of Edmonds . specifications. 2. Erosion control methods shall be establi$hed.prior to the start of this work. Erosion controls shall be maintained as necessary to assure that no dirt or sediments enter the stream. - 3. All earth areas adjacent to:.the watercourse which are e1iosed .or disturbed by this proj act are to be planted with suitable vegeta-. tive cover to preventto protect fish;life.. ,ionand 4. '.Extrema care shall. be taken to assure' no .deleterious material . such as fresh cement 'concrete lime, " petroleum 'products, be to chemicals, silt, etc„ allowed enter the,water'. S. The retention/detention facilities shall be cleaned of sand, silt or other debris refore releasing-stormwater to the system. .LOCATION: The southeast corner of 5th Ave. S. and Holly -Dr, Edmonds. jkd .. " i i SEPAIDNS, City of Edmonds, May 1992 - - HABITAT BIOLOGIST: Tony Oppermann • (206): 775-1311, ext.. 109' AGENT:Hendricks P3 APPLICANT - FISHERIES - AGENT - INVESTIGATOR - REGION - OLYMPIAe DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE DIRECTOR • 05: 04 FAX 2002 7998 LOVELL SAPERLaND0. BLTTERFIELD @ 003 THIS APPROVAL IS'TO BE AVAILABLE ON.THE JOB SITE AT ALL TIMES AND ITS PROVISIONS FOLLOWED BY THE - PERMITTEE ANDOPERATORPERFORMING THE WORK. THE PERSON(S) TO WHOM THIS APPROVAL IS ISSUED MAY BE HELD LIABLE FOR ANY LOSS OR DAMAGE TO FISHLIFEOR FISH HABITAT WHICH RESULTS FROM FAILURE TO COMPL7( WITH. THE PROVISIONS OF.THIS APPROVAL, FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THIS APPROVAL COULD RESULT IN A CIVIL PENALTY OF UP TO ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS PER DAY OR A GROSS MISDEMEANOR ' CHARGE, POSSIBLY PUNISHABLE By FINE OR IMPRISONMENT. .ALL HYDRAULIC PROJECT AP SUBJECT TO ADDITIONAL RESTRICPROVALS ISSUED 'PURSUANT TO NOW 75.20.100 ARE TIONS; CONDITIONS, OR REVOCATION IF:THE - DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE DETERMINES THAT NEW BIOLOGICAL OR PHYSICAL INFORMATION INDICATES THE: NEED FOR SUCH ACTION. THE PERMITTCA HAS THE RIGHT PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 34.04''RCW TO APPEAL SUCH DECISIONS. ALL HYDRAULIC PROJECT OAPPROVALS ISSUED PURSUANT TO ACH7S.20:103 MAY BE. MODIFIED BY THE DEPARTMENT F FISH AI:D.WILDLIFE DUE To CHANGED CONDITIONS AFTER CONSULTATION WITH THE PERKITTEE: PROVIDED, HOWEVER, THAT SUCH MODIFICATIONS SHALL BE SUBJECT TO .APPEAL TO THE HYDRAULIC APPEALS BOARD ESTABLISHED IN RCW 7S.20. 110. THIS APPROVAL PERTAINS 'ONLY'TO'Thi'PROVISZONS OF THE FISHERIES AND WILDLIFE CODES. ADDITIONAL 'AUTHORIZATION,£ROS ONS O PTHE F AGENCIES NAY HE' NECESSARY FOR THIS PROJECT. _ IJ ' - � 4 1 . .APPEALS GENERAL. INFORMATIO� IF YOU'WISH TO APPEAL DENIAL OR CONDITIONS OF AN Al IF ERE'ARE INFOA!`AI: AND FORMAL APPEAL PROCESSES AVAILABLE. r A. INFORMAL APPEALS: AN INFORMAL APPEAL (WAC 220-116-340) CONSISTS OF CONTACTINN�G THE_AREp HABITAT BIOLOGIST AND DISCUSSING YOUR CONCERNS. MOST PR08L1TH ARE RESOLVED AT THIS LEVEL, BUT, IF NOT,'YOU MAY ELEVATE YOUR CONCE$HS TO THE ASSISTANT DI_RECTOR O£ THE HABITAT DIVISION IN OLYMPIA. THE HABITAT DIVISION' ASSISTANT DIRECTOR'S DECISION SRALL BE APPROVED OR DISAPPROVED BY THE DIRECTOR OR DESIGNEE. IF YOU ARE NOT SATISFIED WITH THE:RESULTS OP THIS INFORMAL APPEAL,..A FORMAL. APPEAL MAY BE FILED. B. FORMAL' APPEALS: - Y) FOR ALL CIVIL PENALTY APPEALS AND FOR OTHER HPA APPEALS WHICH ARE NOT ASSOCIATED WITH IRRIGATION OR STOCK -WATERING DIVERSIONS, A WRITTEN APPEAL REQUEST RUST BE FILED WITH THE DEPARTMENT THAT ISSUED.OR DENTED THE APPRO VAL OR LEVIED ^a PE CIVIL -PENALTY YOU ARE APPEALING (WAC 220-110-350). 2) FOR APPEALS or DENIAL OR GATCONDITIONS OF AN HPA.ASSOCYATED•WITHIRRI- IOt7 OR STOCK -WATERING DIVERSIONS OTHER THAN CIVIL PENALTY' APPEALS BOARD PER WAC 259-04. THE MAILING ADDRESS OF THE APPEALS BOARD IS; - ENVIRONHT,NTAL HEARINGS OFFICE,, BUILDING TWO, ROWE SIX, LACEYy WASNINGTON',- 98SO4I TELEPHONE (206) 459-6327..' ING RESULTS IN FORFEITUREFAILURE TO APPEAL WITH 30 DAYS OF THE 'DATE .OF ALL'Ap?EAAL RIGHTS. OF ACTION 'YOU ARE APPEAL- ZN s5 I co ++ T;�% rtAI4 u050r- uoi 44- s] T&.e50 r--L,'HOV Re2 kvA FOh,i12. !9-1111 RECEIVED 9 '�94 PERMIT COUNTER RECEIVED MAR 2 9 1994 PERMIT COUNTER ?�'t,+--it r-2 P41. CITY OF EDMONDS OFFICIAL TRUCK ROUTES 5-�oaue- /d— /0s/ e J'LI L Y M X W 0 0 0 . � r.._ (rl�//.e 1. _�.1 •!W}.�� •�,...' wi�.i IFiil •I '<•� ^ A. of Edmon RIGHT CONSTRUCTION PERMTI RN bar i;.,- :: it':,:':' has Date:---�17T�/ A. Address or vicinity of Construction:504 Hol 1 y Drive �8 q� B. Type ofWork (be specific):Trench in RlW and bore -driveway 9p-19 C. Contractor: Snohomish County PUB NO.1 Contact: Jerry El ki ngton Mailing Address: PO Box 1107 EgFbAt, Wa ph,=: 147 _4414 State license #: Liability Insatanoe: _ Bond: $ D. Building Permit # (if applicable): Side Sewer Permit # (if applicable): E. ❑ Commercial ❑ Subdivision ❑ City Project M Utility (PUD, GTE, WNG, CABLE, WATER) ❑ Multi -Family ❑ Single Family ❑ Other INSPECTOR: INSPECTOR: F. Pavement or Concrete Cut : ❑ Yes ®No G. Sim of Cut: _ x _ H. Charge,j APPLICANT TO READ AND SIGN INDEMNITY: AFpRcnntundesslands and by hu sigralurew this apphe Uan, agrees to hoMthe CAtyofEdmoMs harmlessfrom i:Varlee, darn os, or claims of any Hind or description whaleoevo , foreseen or unforeseen, that nay be mode agvirut the CRY of EdnwMe, or aay of ifs departments or employees, ineludtngornot(united to dadeferve ofany tegalporeedings including defense costa, and attorney free by remonof,ranan, lhuperadt. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WORKMANSHIP AND MATERIALS MR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FOLLOWING THE FINAL ✓NSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE OFTHE WORK. ESTIMATED RESTORATION FEES WILL BE HELD UNT6 THE FINAL STREET PATCH 1S COMPLETED BYCITYFORCES, AT WHICH TIMEA DESITORCREDIT WILL REPROCESSED FORISSUANCE TO THEAPPLICANT. Construction drawing of proposed work required with permit application. A 24 hour notice is required for inspection; Please call the Engineering Division, 771-0220. Work and material is to be inspected during progress and at completion. . Restoration is to be in accordance with City Codes. Street shall be kept clean at all times. Traffic Control and Public Safety shall be in accordance with City regulations asrequired by the City Engineer. All streetcutditches shall be patched with asphalt or City approved material prior to the and of the workingday; NO EXCEPTIONS. I have read the above statements and understand thepermit requirements and thepink copyof thepermit will be available on site at all times for i lion purpo ea. Signature: 1prry lkinernn Date: November 17, 1994 (Contractor o Age CALL DIAL A -DIG PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK FOR CITY USE ONLY / L b� APPROVED BY: K[. RIGHT OF WAY DEPOSIT P TIME AUTRORIMD: VOID AFTER i y F GAYS DISRUPTION FEWFUND ill: . SPECIAL CONDITIONS: RESTORATION FEE: PERMIT FEE: . TOTAL FEE: COMMENTS: RECEIPT FEE: j]�f DATE: ISSUED BY: NO WORK SHALL BEGIN PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE sums. nrv.:ss: LOVELL-SAUERLAND & ASSQkINC. 19400 33rd Ave. W. Suite - LYNNWOOD, WA 98036 a�44�r�� 4�a��ao�caa Phone (206) 775-1591 Seattle (206) 340-0830 FAX (206) 672-7998 TO City of Edmands; Public Works Department 250 5th Ave Edmonds, WA 98020 WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Attached ❑ Under separate cover via ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION Enclineering plans THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ For your use ❑ As requested ❑ For review and comment - ❑ FORBIDS DUE ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ Return corrected prints 19 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS Dear tiorcly, The attached Is any questions. _ COW TO i�iJT'FE2F1 --l]i lam:/ ( 5E'i' py RECYCLED PnPER: L(( content.: an: P�.ce.s.mel.+ox RPR.covmner SIGNED: if enclosures arc not as noted, kindly notlry,ui at once. so •40 262 15 Jun 4 LSA No. 2624 DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS FOR TASO CHRISTOPHILIS PROPERTY AT 5TH AVENUE SOUTH AND HOLLY DRIVE, EDMONDS, WASHINGTON These calculations replace a set dated March 26, 1993. RECEIVED JUN171994 /45QPERMIT COUNTER The proposed project includes construction of a multi -story building and associated parking at the southeast corner of the intersection of 5th and Holly. The site is approximately square, and covers 0.42 acres. Of this 0.265 acres is intended for development. The remainder will be left in a natural condition. The existing surface of the portion of the site to be developed consists of gravel and hard earth, with the fringes covered in grass and some brush. It is estimated that the gravel area is about 10,000 square feet. There is evidence of past development (including a house and garage) and it has been reported that the site was used by the City's contractor for construction staging during road improvement operations. Based on a discussion with the city's drainage engineer, the predevelopment condition is assumed to be 1500 square feet of gravel (C=0.75), 8500 square feet of grass (C=0.30), and the remainder trees and brush (C=0.20). The following calculations are provided to support the designeddetention storage volume. The calculations allow up to 3,500 square feet of bypass. The actual bypass is expected to be less than that, based on preliminary architectural plans. A reduction in bypass would result in a further reduction, in the designed release. PPr�,(,L� ,Cj4\ Page 1 CITY OF EDMONDS LAURA M. HALL ... M.� �i•. 250-5TH AVE. N. EDMOND5, WA 98020 • (2081 ]Tt-0220 FAX 12081 ))1-0221 MAYOA COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT .1 O Public Works • Planning • Parks and Recrealion . Engineering - B 9 0 t 9 � April 1,1994 Mailed 4/l/94 Craig Campbell Lovell-Sauerland & Associates, Inc. 19400 - 33rd Ave. W. #200 Lynnwood, WA 98036 011KI10175101W Il ): Dear Craig, The Engineering Division has completed initial review of the subject plans and has the following comments: l • Provide water quality enhancement for paved areas. • Recalculate detention based upon enclosed red -lined calculations. • Provide profiles of the storm drainage system. • Check calculations for slope on detention pipe. Twenty percent (20%), if correct, not permitted. • Provide detail of existing CBMH and tie-ins. • Label fifteen (15) foot minimum creek setback to building and paving. • Catch basins in unpaved areas to have solid covers. - • Seeding and mulching on steep slopes adjacent to creek must immediately follow grading. • Add filter fabric as appropriate at bottom of slope adjacent to 5th Avenue. • Provide a note showing construction sequence. • All dimensions critical to the site plan must be shown on plans to be approved by City Engineer. Provide dimensions for parking spaces and parking lot aisle widths. • Holly Drive should have a crown. Provide street section that reflects such. • If paving on south side of parking area is for trash enclosure, provide means for garbage truck to access area without being impeded by parked cars. • Provide extruded curb to separate all parking and driving areas from landscaped areas. • Foundation drains are to be approved and inspected by the Building Division. • Concrete retaining wall to be approved by Building Division. AD8lW91.DDC • Irxorporaled August 11, 1890 Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan • Provide cross sections of property in both directions. Provide profile of centerline of driveway. • Provide elevations at driveway entrance. Clarify six percent (6%) comments. • Because Holly Drive has an inverted crown, provide spot elevations at centerline and edge of existing paving at twenty (20) foot stationing. Street section will be deterrhined based upon this information being provided. • Verify property line along Holly Drive. • Stencil "no parking" on yellow painted curb for thirty (30) feet from curb return south of Holly Drive. Relocate parking striping and signs as needed. • Provide "no parking this side" signs in two (2) locations on Holly Drive. • Show proposed new location of power pole to be relocated on Holly Drive. • Seven to ten foot wide sidewalk is required in this land use zone. Remove and replace 5th Ave. sidewalks. • Provide wheelchair access ramp at 5th and Holly. When the necessary additions and revisions have been made, return the enclosed red - lined plans and calculations with four (4) sets of revised plans for additional review. If there are any questions, please contact me at 771-0220. S' ely, P 6Z n, � RDO C. HYDE Alberts Enginee mg Coordinator GCH/sf Enclosures c: Sharon Nolan, Building Permit Coordinator ADBI0791. DOC STREET FILE CITY OF EDMONDS ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Office/Condo Building 2. Name of applicant: Robert Butterfield 8 ASsociates 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: 400 Dayton, Edmonds, WA 98020. 775-0564 Contact person: Robert Butterfield 4. Date checklist prepared: ''April 9,1992 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Edmonds. 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Begin construction: Sum 1992 First occupancy: Wtr 1992 (STAFF COMMENTS) 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No (STAFF COMMENTS) CHKLT110-8-91.MASTEn Page 1 of 26 a. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. None (STAFF COMOiNTS) 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No (STAFF COMSENTS) 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your approval, if known. None (STAFF COMQ:NTS) 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those Answers on this page. Construction of all,860 ± square foot building consisting of 6000 square foot office on the Ist and.2nd floor with 5800 sq. feet of condos on two floorsabove, andly600t square feet of parking garage in the rear. The project includes a total of 23: parking stalls with associated landscaping on a 20;115 (STAFF COMMENTS) square foot site. 17 stalls -on Site, 6 stalls -off CHKIT/10-9-91.MASTER Page 2 of 26 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, 'including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal- would occur over a range of area, provide range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. while you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. - Street address: 504 Holly, Edmonds, on corner of 5th Ave. S. and Holly Drive. Section 25, Township 27 North, Range 3 East, W.M., Snohomish County. (STAFF COMMENTS) TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat rolling, hilly, steep slopes,. mountainous, other: Site is generally flat on north end where bulk of construction is to occur. Average slope this area equals 6%, steepest slope this area equals 15%.. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? Steepest slope on site occurs at creek bank which is ¢0% slope. (STAFF COMMENTS) W 1'2� S CHK1Tn0-S-31.MASTER Page 3 of 26 C. what general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Soils in this vicinity generally include silty sands and sandy silts. No agricultural uses in the recent past. (STAFF d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No (STAFF e. Describe the purpose, type and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed.- Indicate source of fill. 475 yds3 cut and 15'D yds3 fill anticipated to locate office at street grade.. Fill.will be.fromton-site, which brings overall. cut Iand fill quantity to 325 ydss cut. (STAFF £. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. No (STAFF CHKLT/10-8-91.MASTER Page 4 of 26 g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 56% (STAFF h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: No erosion anticipated. All storm water and siltation occurring during construction will be contained on -site and discharged in an approved manner. (STAFF 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. None (STAFF COMMENTS) I ec b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may effect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No (STAFF COMMENTS) CHKIT110-8-91.MAST R pace 5 of 26 C. Proposed measures to reduceor control emissions or other impacts to the, if any: None (STAFF COMMENTS) 3. WATER a. Surface: (1) Is there any surface water body an or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater,lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. Yes. Shellabarger Creek. (STAFF COMMENTS) (2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? I£ yes, please describe available plans. Yes (STAFF COMMENTS) (3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. CHKLT/10-8-91.MASTER Page 6 of 26 (STAFF (4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions. Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. (STAFF COMMENTS (5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. (STAFF COMMENTS) (6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. All discharges to city sewer system. (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Ground: (1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, propose, and approximate quantities if known. No CHKLT110-8-91.MASTEF Page 7 of 26 (STAFF COMMENTS) (2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None. All discharges to city sewer system. (STAFF COMMENTS) C. Water Runoff (including storm water): (1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (including quantities, if known). .Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Roof and paving areas will drain to an approved underground collection system and discharge into existing C.B. at Shellabarger Creek (on site). (STAFF COMMENTS) (2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No (STAFF COMMENTS) CHKLT/10-8.91 MASTER Paae 8 of 26 d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Storm water will be detained on -site in a system engineered and constructed to meet city approval. Water is discharged into existing C.B. at Shellabarger Creek (on site). - - (STAFF COMMENTS) 4. Plants - a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other:_ X evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other X shrubs X grass pasture crop or grain X wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other• water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other: _other types of vegetation (STAFF b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be remove or altered? Shrubs to be removed from property north of Shellabarger Creek. Shrubs south -of creek and on east property line to remain. No shrubs will removed from creek area below top of bank. CNKLT/10-8-91.MASTER - Page 9 of 26 (STAFF C. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None (STAFF COtM1ENTS d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other materials to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: The oroiect will be landscaped to meet city standards using trees shrubs and ground cover whichare indigenous to this area. (STAFF S. Animals a. Check or circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: X birds: hawk, heron, eagle, son birds other: X mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: Small rodents only _fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: (STAFF COMMENTS) CHKLT/10-8-91 MASTER Page 10 of 26 b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. (STAFF COMMENTS) C. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. No (STAFF COMMENTS) d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None (STAFF COMMENTS) 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Natural gas for heating (STAFF CHKLT110-e-91.MASTER Page 11 of 26 b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No (STAFF C. what kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? Building will be designed to meet Washington State Energy Code standards and will include thermal insulation, vapor barriers, and joint sealants to improve energy conservation. (STAFF COMMENTS) 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so describe. None (STAFF COMMENTS) (1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None (STAFF COIMfENTS) CWKLT/10 8 91.MASTER Page 12 Of 26 (2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: No health hazards identified. (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Noise (1) what types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? None (STAFF COMMENTS) a (2) what types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Noise levels from automobiles, trucks, and construction equipment are expected during normal business:hours and will not exceed the ambient levels from adjacent streets. (STAFF COMMENTS) (3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None (STAFF COMMENTS) CMKIT/10-8-91.MASTEa Page 13 of 26 s. Land and Shoreline Use A., What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Site is currently not used. Adjacent property to east is single residential, property to north, west and south is commercial/retail. (STAFF COMMENTS) - b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No (STAFF COM NTS) C. Describe any structures on the site. None (STAFF COMMENTS) d. Will.any structures be demolished? If so, what? No (STAFF COMMENTS) e. What is the current aening classification of the site? BC Community Business CHKIT/10.8-e1.MASTEH Page 14 of 26 (STAFF f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? BC Community Business (STAFF g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master plan designation of the site? Not applicable (STAFF COMMENTS) h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally , sensitive" area? If so, specify. No (STAFF COMMENTS) i. Approximately how many' people would reside or work in the completed project? Fifteen to twenty-five people (STAFF COMMENTS) CHKLT/10-8-91WASTER Page 15 of 26 j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None (STAFF COMMENTS) k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None (STAFF COMMENTS) 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: Proposed use is consistent with comprehensive plan and zoning and existing neighboring uses. (STAFF COMMENTS) 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing.. four units, middle income housing. (STAFF COMMENTS) CHKLTn O-B-91.MASTER Page 16 of 26 b. Approximately how many units, if any would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None (STAFF COMMENTS) C. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None (STAFF COMMENTS) 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principle exterior building material(s) proposed? Thirty feet. Principle materials include concrete block, stucco, aluminum and glass, brick, and metal roof. (STAFF COMMENTS) b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? View from house at east property line would not be significantly as there is already an existing 7' hedge. altered (STAFF COMMENTS) CHKLT/10-8-91.MASTER Page 17 of 26 C. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: The project will be,aesthetically compatible with- , surrounding existing structures. (STAFF COMENTS) - 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Night lighting will be designed to assure safety and security for project users. Building materials will be selected to reduce glare. (STAFF b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No (STAFF COMMENTS) C. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your Proposal? None (STAFF COMMENTS) CHKIT110-8-91.MASTER page 18 of 26 d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: (STAFF COMMENTS) 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Parks in downtown Edmonds and Edmonds waterfront (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreation uses? I£ so, describe. No (STAFF COMMENTS) C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None (STAFF COMMENTS) CHKLT110-8-91NASTER Page 19 of 26 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None (STAFF COMMENTS) C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None (STAFF COMMENTS) 16. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and -describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. 5th Ave. S. and Holly Drive are public streets adjacent to property entrances/exits on Holly Drive (STAFF CHKLT/10-8-81.MASTER page 20 of 26 b. Is site currently served by public transit? If no, What is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop] Yes. Community Transit services 5th Ave. S. within one block of site. (STAFF COMMHMTS) C. Now many parking spaces would the many would the project eliminate? 23 parking spaces. No parking completed project have? How eliminated by project. 17 parkingstallson-site 6 parking stalls - off -site or purchased from city (STAFF COMMENTS) d. Will the proposal require any new roads or street, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No (STAFF COMMENTS) a. Will the project use (or occur in water, rail, or air transportation? No the immediate vicinity of) If so, generally describe. (STAFF COMMENTS) CHKIT/10-8-81.MASTEa page 21 of 26 f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Approximately 25to 50. (STAFF COM4ENTS) g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: None (STAFF ComwmTs) 15. Public Services a. would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any: None (STAFF COMMENTS) CHKLT/10.8-91.MASTER Page 22 of 26 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, 'sanitary sewer, septic system,, other: None (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general constructioa� activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be 4 needed. Natural Gas: Washington Natural Gas 1 Water: City of Edmonds Telephone: GTE Sanitary Sewer: City of Edmonds/Storm Sewer: City of Edmonds Electricity: Sno. Co. PUD - (STAFF COMMENTS) C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature of Zoponent Date Submitted CHKLT/10-8.91.MASTER Page 23 of 26 vo -oa_ STREET FILE STREET USE PERMIT APPLICATION NAME OFAPPLICANT. �Q-Y\�. �mo,,) T NAME OF BUSINESS: O Ia MAE.INGADDRESS: CONTACT PERSON AND PHONE NUMBER::1f\Q \^w ADDRESS OF PUBLIC USE:_ Describe the public place or portion of public space to be utijized: �Q C�Ci� + 7� e U F re �n rll Ct AT Y In Specify the type of use 4° Specify the length Of thne for use: so aGk NOTE: The issuance of this permit is understood by the applicant to e a temporary nature and that no vested right is granted. INDEMNITY., The applicant understands and by his/her signature to this application, agrees to hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any injuries, damages or claims of any kind or description whatsoever, foreseen or unforeseen, that may be made against the applicant or the City of Edmonds, or any of its departments or employees, including but not limited to the defense or any legal proceedings including defense costs, court costs, and attorney fees by reason of granting this permit. In addition, the application understands that the City shall be provided a Certificate of Insurance to indemnity and hold harmless the City of Edmonds from all claims and/or property damage, and naming the City of Edmonds as an additional insured. CODE APPLICATION: Bysigning the application below the applicant warrants that s/he has read or had the opportunity to read Chapter 18 of the Edmonds Community Development Code and s/he understands that all terms of the adopted ordinance are incorporated herein as Ifset forth in full and this application and permits therefore are subject to the terms of that Chapter. s— I Struseho.docjlg6/98 SIGNATURE OF APPROVAL FROM ABUTTI15G PROPERTY OWNERS When applicable, if the street use proposal directly impacts any adjacent business or private property owner the applicant must obtain written approval from the affected parties. Note, this requirement is evaluated by City Staff and, when required, the applicant will be notified. Signature Address +rtrtrt+rtrtrt:rtrrrrrtrrtrtrtrtrtrrtrrrt+++rrt+rrrrt+rtrtrtrrrtrt+rrrr+rrtrtrt++rt++rtrt++++++rt++++rrtrtrrtrt+++++++ DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE --FOR CITY USE ONLY Planning Division Approved By ADR# Date ) 7 1®7 O__ Public Works Approved By /— ;...� Fire Department Approved By 4�9 Dare 'L coo Police Department Approved By '�w ti,.) Date ao Certificate of Insurance Verified Byte_- Engineering Division Approved By "14 Bond Date /Z/--Zlo Remarks or Comments:&AEY=e is A"Pue 'eooH QN si 5 (3eu;uo?,L sbo.-DUHPLO-AnoVQ ",;J APPL;cAWr On- -0 r a r p� i-ie-oo awmv zww" wir c iN a,ec.0 Z2 e&-ks nee- �W""M STREET USE PERMIT#_ -oz DATF t)F TCCTiANC F iJ RELEASED BY� RFrFIPT # / U K4 / I, J SVuscho.dwjlg6/98 AC30RD CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE 0i%iizon PRODUCER Northcreek Insurance Services, Inc PO 80x 885 I OOdinvilla WA 98072 ( L425)489-3412 (425)489-3414 Fax THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE INSURER) D.,T. Development, LTD. 1725 Rucker Ave Everett,WA 98201 INSURERA: American states neuran e INSURER B: INSURER C'. _ INSURER D'. INSURERS COVERAGES DEV FRIM MONDg THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTVVITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN. THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS. EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. AGGREGATE LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. .NSA MEOFINSURANGE POMYNDMBE0. �YMEFFEGTYE POMCY F[%MTX)H UNITS A GENERAL INMIfIY x COMMERCMLGBNEMLLMBLITY CLAIMSMADF Mx OCCUR x Stop Gap - 01-CE-868139-1 07-30-99 07-30-00 E HOCCURRENCE f RREDAMAGEIM .G.) f MED E%P IMFw paean) f PERSONALSADVINJURY $ GENERALAGGREGATE f GENLAGGREWTEUMRAFWIESPER: M- LOG PRODUCTS-CCMPOPAGG f 11 PD--Y F7 A AUTOMOBILE LNBIUTY ANYAUTO MLOYMEDAUTOB SCHEOULEDAUTOS MRE..0S NON-0 EDAWOS'. . 01-CE-868051-1 07-30-99 07-30-00 COMBINEDSINGLFUMIT IEe emnBm) $1,000,000 x IpII.' INJURY S BODILY INJURY IPFIBiKMYJ S PROPERTY OPMAGE f IMAGE INBLITY AM'AUTO - - AUTOO LY-EAAOODENT $ OMERTMN EA ACL AUTOCMLY: AGG B I EVARS MAMLITY OCCUR F-10WMSMADE DEDUCTIBLE RETEMION f EACH! OCCURRENCE F AGGREGATE S f S S WOBIERBCOMPENU1 AND EMPLO WE WUW •` OT T YIS, EL. EACH ACCIDENT ry E p ELL. DO SE -EA EMPLOYEE S E.L.DMEASE-POLICY LISTS OMER I DESCRIPTION OF OPEMTONShOCATONSNENWLESSEXCLUSIONS ADDEO BYFNOORSFMENTMMML PROVISIONS It is understood and agreed that the City of Edmonds is named as Additional Insured. City of Edmonds 121 5th Ave N Edmonds WA 98020 SHOULDANY OF ME ABOVE DESCRIBEDPOUGES BE CANCELLED BEFORE ME EVIMTION MIT THEREOF, ME ISSUING INSURER WILL ENDEAVOR TO MIL 30 RAYS MITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERnM ATE HOLDER NAMED TO ME LEFT, BUT FAILURETO DO SO SHALL IMPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR UASILTY OF ANY RAND UPON ME INSURER TB AGENTS OR F ED,1) 1y v �O CITY OF EDMONDS 121 STH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS, WA 98020 me IRN� PHONE: (425)7t1-0220- FAX:(425) 7714221 STATUS: ISSUED ENG20060461 Permit Number: ENG20060461 Address of Public Use/Ewroachment: 525 5TH AVE S 100, EDMONDS 525 STH AVE S 525 5TR AVE S EDMONDS. WA 99020 EDMONDS, WA 98020 STREET IS EENC'ROACI INILN] P r P STREET USE. Placement of any temporary or movable objects in any portion of public space or City right-of-way shall meet all code requirements as set forth in the following chapters of the Edmonds Community Development Code. ENCROACHMENT: Permanent structures encroaching upon any portion of public space, City right-of-way or easement area shall meet all Code Requirements as set forth in the following chapter of the Edmonds Community Development Code. CODE APPLICATION: Chapter 18.70. 17.65, and 17.70.040 of the Edmonds Community Development Code. All terms of the adopted ordinance are incorporated herein as if setforth in full and this permit therefore is subject to the terms of those chapters. FOR THE TERM IN WHICH THISPUBLIC INEIENCROACHMENTISINEFFECT, THE OWNER SHALL COMPL YWITH THE PERMIT CONDITIONS SET FORTH BYTHIS PERMIT. NOTE: The issuance of this permit is understood by the owner to be of a temporary nature, shalt vest no permanent right and shall be issued and may in any case be revoked at the sole discretion of the City per ECDC 18. 70.040. Applicant is responsible to provide a copy of the insurance certificate to the City at the beginning of each calendar year, no later than the 21st day of January. ' INDEMNITY: The Applicant understands and agrees to hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any injuries, damages or claims of any kind or description whatsoever, foreseen or unforeseen, that may be made against the applicant or the City of Edmonds, or any of its departments or employees, including but not limited to the defense of any legal proceedings including defense costs, court cost, and attorney fees by reason of granting this permit. In addition, the applicant understands that he/she shall provide and continually maintain during the term of the permit a certiificate of insurance naming the city as an additional insured, with respect to liability, and providing that it shall be primary as to any other policy of insurance. AND FEESAKEPAID,AND RECEIPTIS ACKNOWLEDGED IN SPACEPROMPED. LECOPY INS PECMR COPY APPUCANT COPY STATUS: ISSUED ENG20060461 • Thte proposal will not adversely impact public space open to vehicular or pedestrian travel- • Architectural Design Board Approval has been granted or the process has been administratively approved. • The proposal will not unreasonably interfere with the rights of the public. • Items shall be placed adjacent to the building and may encroach onto a maximum oftwo feet of the public sidewa&; or in accordance with Bistro and outdoor dung code; or per an approved building permit. • Safe Pedestrian travel area, or clear zone, of44 inches minimum width, providing a level safe walking surface along the public sidewalk, shall be maintained. (e.g. measuring 44 inches from edge of street tree grates or newspaper stands toward place of business.) • Exterior light FA res, banners, signs and Bags must provide for a minimum clear zone of 7 feet above City right-of-way. • Clear Landings of 44 inches or no less than the width of the door (whichever is greater), measured toward the street, shall be maintained on the exterior side of all required exit doors. • IIMni ation from the city light fatures shall not be blocked. • No objects shall be hung from the City light standards. • Three feet ofclearance around fire hydrants, standpoes, P.I.Ws, manholes, water meters, blowofrs, cleanouts and valves stall be maintained. INSPECTIONS • • PLANNING DATA STREET FILE -- Signs -- Name: ;Lb/KA)( GVIAngpLV;Ay Date: 09.20 y00(p Site Address: 52.6 5 rH .4Ve. 9 • :W 10 0 Plan Check #: BLD-2006- 1039 Project Description: 9, hlv 1t face dfsplay wivotutt:d At uVnfV1+m facej Reduced Site Plan Provided: &0 pK Zoning: e r, OGYt�U'L Comprehensive Plan Designation: DDWVI-IV W YI ' Map Page: 163 Comer Lot: (YES to Flag Lot: (YES A9 ADB File # (or date waived): A.(IVVV"%; a p VOvfi 09 20, 2-00 L TOTALArea erT ofS' n Type of Sign Allowed in zone? Matrix conditions met? Allowed area per unit Unit TOTAL sign area allowed for this sign Proposed sign area Examp/e wan w//nteah it/uminanpn Yesw/fn , p°^tlinona Yes 1 sq. R.roxrea/ R attached wa// a1 R atbchetl wa// 41 square feet 20squam reef Sign#1 Wall (iYot'WAI tlluwti' yth) Wito (,avtditton5 I-C \\ (pPgaL4) a M,61 WAII '+1,5'i� 12! xz/ 2�}� Sign #2 Sign #3 TOTAL Sign Area for TenanYSite Max Permitted: Previous Total: �Qj?Bp, Proposed Total: S' n Height Sign Type: WAI I Max Permitted: 1 L{ t Actual Height: I 1 r Sign Type: Max Permitted: Actual Height: Sign Type: Max Permitted: Actual Height: Sign Lighting Sign Type: WAIT Proposed: 'n KM41 (IIL4M Allowedin Zone: (,Dndif'foldi( Sign Type: Proposed: Allowed in Zone: Sign Type: Proposed: Allowed in Zone: PLANNING DATA • STREETF/LE -- Signs — Sign Colors Proposed: QPA.1uRi Acceptable? Requires ADB Approval? G{,d'(rY✓LN�� . Sign Location Iffreestanding and 8-feet drover (unless a fence) meets setbacks? . N ( k—. ' - ee ad Setbacks. Street' N'A„ Side: Side: Rear: Actual Setbacks - Street: Side: Side: Rear: Landscaping forFreestondin Signs Size: Location: Critical Areas Determination M ❑ Study Required ❑ Waiver iJ A- Other — Ka)-O 9wfi �9 effwr -- 5ign f*( 19pt4�6n'Lind rn445t b,(, ikkad 'If ytif,,1?y Plan Review By: g�a.o Cn. �Qs PERMIT EXPIRES CITY OF EDMONDS USE PERMIT ZONERIC, NUMBER 0 CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION SUITFJAPll ADDRESS OWNER NAMF/NAME OF BUSINESS - LEGAL DESCRIPTION CHECK SUB IVISION NO. LIDNO. a MA IN'G A D ESS /IT z O PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP TESCP Appdov.o ❑ Rw R.'— R.pu ❑ CITY ZIP TELEPHONE EXISTING «,—P.—Rpe REQUIRED DEDICATION ❑ .vw" R.a.h.a ❑ PROPOSED S,Cew.►Rpu..tl ❑ F METER SIZE LINE SIZE NO. OF FIXTURES PRV REOUIRED Q V YES ❑ NO ❑ _ t AOORESS a = REMARKS W u a � a = CITY ZIP TELEPHONE NAME ; ENGINEERING MEMO DATED REVIEWED BY a ADDRESS O �R - FIRE MEMO DATED HI wF wFp By a a a - Z CITY ZIP TELEPHONE Am (1'1111111� U VARIANCE OR CU ADBF SHORELINE IT 7ATE LICENSt NUMBER EXPIRATION DATE CHECKED BY SEPA REVIEW SIGN AREA HEIGHT COMPLETE EXEMPT ALLOWED PROPOSED ALLOWED PROPOSED O LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY � INCLUDE ALL EASEMENTS I F EXP a LOT COVERAGE REQUIRED SE TdACKS (FT) PROPOSED SETBACKS (FT.) y ALLOWED PROPOSED FRONT SIDE REAR FRONT L/R SIDE REAR O D z V PROPERTY TAX ACCOUNTPARCEL'har z j LOT AREA PLANNING REVIEW BY DATE ❑ NEW �j,RE51DENTIAL PLUMBING/MECH , REMARKS JLpDOITION COMMERCIAL COMPLIANCE OR 7C/ ❑ ❑ CHANGE OF USE ❑ REMODEL 0 APARTMENT ❑ SIGN ❑ GRADING FENCE REPAIR ❑ CVOS ❑ ( % FTI _ _ CHECKEOBV TYPIOFCONSTFIUC71ON CODE OCCUPANT ❑ DEMOLISH ❑ TANK I�j OTHER �jffi GROUP GARAGEROCI/i/-��.�A�.�"��./ A1901k SPECIAL INSPECT R ARE OCCUPANT z ❑ CARPORT ❑ RETAINING WAIL ❑ RENEWAL REQUIRED ❑ YES LOAD O F (TYPE OF USE. BUSINESS OR ACTIVITLAT REMARKS ace -PROGRESS INSPECTIONS PER USC 108 a Y) E%P w NUMBER UMBER OF CRITICAL OF DWELLING AREAS a, STORIES UNITS NUMBER DESCRIBE WORK 70 BF DONE • FINAL INSPECTION REQUIRED VALUATION FFl= PLAN CHECK FEE r HEAT SOURCE GLAZING % LOT SLOPE % BUILDING PLAN CHECK NO: VFSTEDOATE PLUMBING MECHANICAL H THIS PERMIT AUTHORIZES ONLY THE WORK NOTED. THIS PERMIT COVERS WORK TO BE DONE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ONLY. ANY CONSTRUCTION ON THE PUBLIC GRADINGIFILL n OMAIN (CURBS,SIDEWALKS. DRIVEWAYS, MAROUEES,ETC.I WILL REQUIRE SEPARATE PERMISSION. i STATE SURCHARGE PERMIT APPLICATION: 180 DAYS _ PERMIT LIMIT, 1 YEAR - PROVIDED WORK IS STARTED WITHIN 180 DAYS STORM DRAINAGE FEES N • 'APPLICANT, ON OF,RALF OF HIS OR HER SPOUSE, HEIRS. ASSIGNS AND SUCCE SOBS ENG INSPECTION FEE IN INTEREST. AGREES TO INDEMNIFY, DEFEND AND IIOLD HARMLESS THE CITY OF EDMONDS. WASHINGTON, ITS OFFICIALS. EMPLOYEES. AND AGENTS FROM ANY AND i ALL CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES OF WHATEVER NATURE, ARISING DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY o FROM THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT. ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT SHALL NOT BE p DEEMED TOMODIFY,WAIVE ORREOUCEANY REQUIREMENT OF ANY CITY ORDINANCE PLANCHECK DEPOSIT NOR LIMIT IN ANY WAY THE CITY'S ABILITY TO ENFORCE ANY ORDINANCE PROVISION.' TOTAL AMOUNT DUE I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ THIS APPLICATION. THAT THE INFORMATION GIVEN IS CORRECT, AND THAT I AM THE OWNER, OR THE DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT OF APPLICATION APPROVAL THE OWNER I AGREE TO COMPLY WITH CITY AND STATE LAWS RFGULATING CONSTRUC- CALL TNis aPPTwalwr` s nm a Permit until s,gnpd by the TION, AND IN DOING THE WORK AUTHORIZED THEREBY, NO PERSON WILL BE EMPLOYED BunO h On,cwl a R•sTor OeP�ly and Foos ado y The and IN VIOLATION OF THE LABOR CODE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RELATING TO FOR INSPECTION rocupl ; Arkrrowlotlgetl 1n sp... pro d d WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE AND RCW 1827. qC, TURE (OWN �GENT� DATE SIGNED (425) OFF# L AT GATE 771-U220 R E SED BIT' / DATE ATTENTION IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL - A cU,-Al IMc0F(:TIf1N NAfZ RFFN MAF)F ANn APPRFIVAI OR A r.FRTIFI• „� „�,,,,,,, ,•,,,(+�„��R STREET FILE USE PERMIT CITY OF EDMONDS ZONE NUMBER �405$2 CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION oe OWNER NAME NAME OF BUSINESS ADDRESS QA'I n i-i �, in .. i l .l•'iI OL/ / / / C LEGAL DESCRIPTION C-11:11 SUBDIVISION NO I L0 NO LEPHONE NUMBER ii1�_—/l 1 " C:AL TY ZIP I TELEPHONE NUMBER PUBLIC RIGHT OF Y PER OFFICIAL sTREET P TESCP Approrad / RW st use Pe,, R F xISnNO REQUIRED DE�ADIC1�AfTION $creel Ufe Parm,l Redd � PROPOSED �W 1" 0,1?0'0A Reauoed Srdewelk Redu,red METER SIZE 1 1111E SIZE I NO OF FIXTURES PRV RIOUIRED YES ❑ NO D ,IiLliK$ Tsfi,�r,�i•,1 R,o.w d� ENGINEERING MEMO DATED 'V ,Eo R+ iTATE LICENSE NUMBER _ yEi(PIRATI L,,s Jq -� SIGN AREA SEPAREVIEW ALLOWED PROPOSED COMPLETE j'x1IVPT _egal Description of Property - include all easements E%P PC Pad 9 6 �g VARIANCE OR CU REVIEW 6Y SETBACKS —.FEET_' �l�'�N 4J FRONT SIOEEAR Properly Tax A"Count Parcel No. 150? `0QQZL_ REMARKS C�:NEW ADDITION REMODEL ❑®iGRADINO REPAIR �OEMOLISH GARAGE fie' �. RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL � APT BIOG t, �.b1+ �ccyos. �' WOODSTOVE INSERT' RETAINING WALU. ' ® ROCKERY _ El 0 j�j LJ a .� . a PLUMBING MECHANICAL SIGN. FENCE I _ x_F7) SWIM POOL HOT TUB/SPA RENEWAL %�G1• / II/l r /[✓/� ///JJ` CHECKED BY�a�.a b TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION :ST_ CODE SPECIAL INSPECTOR REQUIRED � YES AREA • 65 REMARKS PROGRESS INSPECTIONS PER UBC 305 (TYPE OF USE, BUSINESS OR ACTIVITY) EXPLAIN �Jt/// G✓ VIA6 N�tUITM�B�ElR(.�T1_ OF STORIES 1. % NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS CRITICAL / AR FJS /t DESCRIBE WORK TO BE DONE (ATTACH PLOT PLAN) [[AA REv rim AOB NO /A17- c l OCCUPANT LOAD , " �nlxEQ U C - FINAL INSPECTION REQUIRED VALUATION FEE PUN CHECK FEE Q BUILDING �W HEAT SOURCE GLAZING PLUMBING P�Mx/r Plan Check No. 1?4 — G MECHANICAL r' This Permit covers work t0 be done on private property ONLY. GRADINGIFILL Any construction on the public domain (curls, sidewPlks, driveways, marquees, etc.) will require separate permission. STATE SURCHARGE L}�D Permll Application: 180 Days NAGE TEE Permit Limit: 1 Year - Provided Work Is Started Within 180 Days "Applicant, On behalf Of his Or her Spouse, heir$. assigns andTION FEE Z successors in interest, agrees to indemnity, defend and hold w harmless the City of Edmonds. Washington, its officials, employees, and agents from any and all Claims for damages of whatever nature. arising directly or indirectly from the issuance DEPOSIT = of this permit. Issuance of this permit shall not be deemed to modify waive or reduce any requirement of any city ordinance nor limit in any way the City's ability to enforce any ordinanceOUNT DUEprovision"I kGN 7 hereby acknowledge that Ihave read this application; that theENTION APPLICATION APPROVAL Information given is correct; and that I am the owner, or the dulyauthorized agent of the owner, I agree to comply with city and PERMIT This application is not a permit until slate laws regulating construction; and in doing the work authoriz-HORIZESed signed by the Building Official Dr his/her thereby. no person will be employed in violation of the LaborLY THE NOTED Deputy: and fees are paid. and receipt is Code oftheStateofWashington relating to Workmen's Compensa-K acknowledged in space provided, tion Insurance and RCW 18.27. ECT30M SIGNATURE (OWNER OR AGENT(�DA�TE SIGNED q�(O DEPARTMENT TY OF Sl ATVRE DATE A C c .J —` ` ! / T DIMONOS CALL FOR RELE ASEO Y DATE ATTENTION INSPECTION IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL A FNAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR ��� —OwAo 11 ORIGINAL — F,le YELLOW — Inspector A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC CHAPTER 3. PINK — Owr.er GOLD — Assessor I in 4 rves�ver+c I A REFERENCE: OFFICE/RETAIUMULTIPLE RES. BLDG. FOR A. CHRISTOPHILIS PREPARED BY: BUTTERFIELD DESIGN GROUP DATED: NOVEMBER.1993 SITE PLAN / •L \A I E•/ / HH-1 HAND HOLE NUMBER AND APPROXIMATE LOCATION Tp 1 TEST PIT NUMBER AND APPROXIMATE LOCATION a'I`I yI 0 10 20 40 scale: 1' - 20' 4 t illi—F-EF OF—yoz1g, -AOL- 1. 7"4E: M: 46 9 1994 2 Ig -A-ar I .7;F SITE PLAN STREET FILE 50-0 ,/,o//y /�, O ERRY E O N 7N SYSTEMS Roun'M 1/r MEfAL :AC2 PA1h17® TO MAT" Et 6 H Ons) RED 12.0' N.ulliiflgWU LLN' NGILIWIIIlayl !s(GU WfIIIIIS UU UW111I1 I( 9• MEM SIGN CAE1NW �nimtlm a) TT 6' on canter ttm�i9�vuyt 7WW PLMM urrno / .1 b.IL d With 2" a 2" L Iran back If mural etude H.Q LAMP—NONATiON o< O Minlmum (2) or 6' on venter 1 2re" uad upenelan baltl Ina aTAR M E:i aAOONG �� a< Minlmum It m El. on nntsr !, ° ` Q 3/t" leg bolt thN LINn to I wood struotumi mambw 1AUAI Minimum (2) or W on canter 's Asotrrseo TO slcN BODY • `- 'r I 3/8a 6 toggle bolts thm t- I ran nud ial. 43 1.4 is Y •a `r^ I 4 ,s Q '�• ¢J `ti y I t. jn �.' . // ,t J ::sn . - �'�,.1 . ti . i .t ' ` U9 - 0 W .9 4— 413 y .�}. ,' >= tom• ��_� ._ae•c. ..� s..u��.. .._ ... .. _.�_....._y__. .. ., .. , ., - .. 1�L Viz " 4- End View X}. 4- 1 Ea...... f •'" Specifications: ..' • , A'e `` I ' • - - - Fabricate and install one single race dls la with a rr,a. ci I • , routed aluminum face and pushed a 5' clear acrylic letters with frosted edges. Rant aluminum frame to - match fascia co er faces will be eftheeltensletient !t 1 - - - gel�nugg o aque letters will have a halo light around the edge subtle ligghtin effect. r. ;• - J - �w'f` Illumination internally with BOOMA fluorescent lamps. Verify conditions in field. Night View With it�etter Ian Office/Deliveries: 7400 Hardeson Road, Everett, WA 98203 . (425) 776.8835 r. (8001488.2430 "��✓✓" Night View With a Tranelunnl Let a \ - _'�_" '- '�rf`/, • i f S T' \ r L , sJ a 'r-,.a'r c _ L ,. A �. l T s S 4 _ �:• / s., � { „•�`,: a _ � .. `-t.• -+ j 6. a L. _ �-��i1=._. �L:.. 1. �..a' i�"• TLC+ r= LEA Su'�_ T�"i`:� � ..�T� . ��« i`: �" Q �:•i� A �_ I.� _ � �j;t . Z ��� , `.w i r`:$.•k s y•'�' ''Yti.'� lli� h� r � i u�'y" " ^' .I �? `.'r5` ~ ,s. r�i �� / i a. •" . i * M � t��7°�GL371{�\ �`:= B .1R9. � :f � ' !_T e " _ . r'_ :.� ` o 0 3 ytr ////,��� .�/ T '!e��.� '• .>S �c�_N.°t. .... a ,.....�L• • u, •t, Z° _ .. ,2.'�' - " •���'I • I �:.,....,,,'.., _+f' u fR' t J�'�n,Iti, 8.. iL - a . . , e '•e - i' as 1 ' i.-. .-4 ".-d^-.1,JyyY w �tMj�. .,, , o� •.W......Y- ...,�..-_•. `F°.1Z � 1. a- ti 1 �T �'' 3 � ".��. .'- : Q99+' �I . ,S - � <- �� s � � ' . J'1i"-.+.�GY••n• c :� fs �~ t"Y h i y ,..�Ci � ` I 'I{.�it''-,, ,f{, ':•r- a�,'�f`_' . �.�•iav �'>- e0 i•. .� 1f Y.. - F '! 1 _1 .,�• L F # 1' . :*�` _ � •fig t`,.', ,� \j l R. � .;�� ..�•,.'• ��, 1 jy ' r,`�t� �'�" � '. ' <e .r•��A,e�.s�.�• � a+rj 9L° �•` ~- :�f��� 4 : f ... t1�at�' `.�.�- 4 ;1 P '•. C� ya� ..' 4 �•,1, ��.ti i _; aJ �r -5r'v$ t f•' 4 MhE2 Proposed Sign 41 APPRUVED AS NOTED /II Existing sign BY idGINE III BYE Date: ._.._ �u &®O_ — Job Name: RlMax 4' - PROIECrNAME&ADDRESS: • Neon Sign Systnn Clien[A rOral: � 7400 71001re.deson Rend REMIAX CXAAIPfONS — Site Address: 5255th AE—ft, WA 98203 venue, Edmonds. WA Date:5-2-06 Designer: Kay Christensen . EMA AVE qPhone: (!25)776-U35 E R R Y Sales Representative: Blake Jacobs Design No 06.OS02kc2,.. , .,.,.,., E:35835 rev 6.19. 6.21 EDMOAT% WA-9=° BERRYNCO77CA4 ® ` fis+• E 0 N 0//ice/0eliveries: 7400 Hardeson Road, Everett, WA 98203 1425 776-8835 BERRYNCO85L1 �.�,� - in srsrcros 1 18001486.2430 �: FOx:(425) 771 8221 --" E•MOIC fnfO®Berryneonsigns.com rwrwD,.�!nl mDtraeDtnwnDt�Dar Dwrrzn.uroa U 'Nothing in this permit approval process shall be interpreted as allowing or permitting the maintenance of any currently existing illegal, nonconforming or unpermitted building, structure or site condition which is outside the scope of the permit application, regardless of whether such building, structure or condition is shown on the site plan or drawing. Such building, structure or condition may be the subject of a separate enforcement action." Any request for modification, variance or other administrative deviation (hereinafter variance") must be specifically called out and tdovsions Approval of any plat or plan containing p which do not comply with city code and for which a STREET FILE variance has not been specifically identified, requested and considered by the appropriate city official in accordance with the appropriate provision of city code or state law does not approve any items not to code specification. RECEIVED SEP 15 2006 BUDDING DEPARTMENT CM OF EDMOsos GENERAL INTERIOR BUILDING SPECIFICATIONS GENERAL NOTES: 1. Cpoxb INY ooaply M M aaYF YaYiYY QptlN011.•. ab Lndb9 rrbrN x prpN.a.Y M pllaro QYw 2. Cam.ctb' Iw b nromNY. bpMYN Y.ba rtl mYYbb b .pbNYd'YP M 4wt IOnI BuIOYp Cmx rb Or6Mtcr. J. Carerectbr Iw.«h .I I�rn aHrRbn w mmmN rm r+r nMpaxl rW gFNCb p 4wl.gn b r.. NAbI Odd. paN.a.V YN M Oa M.aw M UrPYgF 4 TM wH a 1- TAPAN• YHe rwy. Ma I. •Fwr.h W br.Il s N nwrnr w.ao�w+YY a wr.o n v�Ia Ya.ara...m e. Coraxbr rr. ao.m...�sn a..pmem.dl.Iw. rIr w.an. m.prara.w a..d aw. to aaad,rlw was Yin va.ln. 1. AM. ro pa•rq NmNMor b •.,NIII aaq vw x' IL51 BuFOIiN SMnre' an M paMwgn oaPAnlrb. M Mr.nN,I�I. q ..IIn bra (10Mq+d M cmbxtd. r.dN dM ttllrudm gamlra. N e.l M rdMNr My Mb YYnW ..I.aN.. 8. Ewry.a nop YW M ap.nw hOin M Iwo. +leas M uN d • W p.rW IptYl blpbOW pYal,.rb YWI b QJOWa rN wr 9. Am aod.ea• w.n.n.I a nor.dmd.Iea a Nmprgr n n .Pvdr.n m..«. 10. N.-, P,n.eN Yb I2.p.rll[r mwrrl YrN.Nbn. YY 12 AMN b Yin Pan M P9a r...D.dr wb.an. ro.y xvk Mrb d.pL IwvPaon a nrd,.Nnl Fin rYlna..rK«. HmcYmn d.drp wwlwn. aINaL nr...., Im,pA rc. aY a caana,Fl.e .In M Wtlrq mrrprnra. 13. Car.ap ru. vr.y r r.paYnrN d.Nd rN.na W^RY a ganw4 Alnlln.a Oy M W W4I'tAbq HpYrwY b m�pHncr .M.I.dItN «Ma...n1 N r.IpaV W kfY a9� H m.+ctlp.. 14Y+An4M d..nw. ProbO.aP rb pl.nn.nl aY,y o.rN u.. rrtn eraem b M.R.uw tlil.rl.rnrd..rn.ra nwI a na.a. oFlo. el..w wn d eIr we n aNY MI M ampr4.r.a a 16lbl wa lY. DaW.amr YY pa.la. M OWro mYwpe.an un br..It) mPY d ' adr awry. 1).Nm.IMW.bN MxUHO 1�. PmT Y aFWleq rAb' nrnqu rr x rqu.q m rrmiPNn .o.M Yo x npam b.Nne.pp.rrw. t9. P1P.b. Y www a.dwN. IA,d.W. Ya lnnynp b wI nY.... .Ilclnpl e..r... wwar w Y dw.rN nawrq A M. LY..dn b pwMF Y HWn.yrcy Fy.Wn. x �q.Yq Iry Y POIotl. coo«.W.^a'9Y'ry.yrpm..glY. dA rcI arha n Ip,'Nrr rimlutlan, h. wmprw.. •m. arm., rrmN. Fprm.rF..,aw ra M.I Nlrw.. rb.a roe 21. N Dx..rm Man mrlrlr b �bI W alp W Nd/a 22. Calib.d YIr A.nM.nap erw.N.b nMe MC.p'nt.vk nMw. Yr Yn aew Io.ar.u. nda,N onbm Nw Npmarll. 6.nvA b nNgnU rdnbor nru 1]7 amPlrl b TtY. 2J Gab.cV Yu. pmtla F.YIa a«.a wrvN p dw NpWrva OP,IY b oa'.d ar rm dope we+nr I aa« np.Iad r.« a.aew M Mq d.aa 2r. Oa.n rb dM dHNN .ad+l OrnYYPv a a.ax b mHT .wlro FUN wow xe. R.P.e.w MIwrI na Ah r�wn p rw.e a M arxp rW a T). N.F.Ycb. an 112' W VYa auq mubwn «n bxr eOTF BUILDING STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS'. DEMISING PANT(fIQN 1 To N - a-- -I b IYd-II I. 1 eA• p 1 1? M pogo m.W N' p cYnd rb xamc bYyb UNG 2. SS ayv.. HP.'X' era I.yr q Nnnr.,N. a p.rollon. .. Prnxn.P.n .ninon b rFph+NI wmI b Jdwm. d.Ra«bq NOUN 5. R-t I B.e mFWu-n m awy. e.'L• MMI r wmr�ran d PY«an.I a..m e. eM99r.aveY pNY. Ya an.r uu.. «n r wr aH rw o.l...� ea GrM rwb aagr rb an.r nw�q.m.nY pN.e.Nn.. INIEPIOR PARTITION 1.1 eATa T K Te pr9. nrW rung. 24' m d+nY xdn wY•Ic a.reV. x Ls enw r>w x p. aw..d'.b. d Ym. y Na uea. 4. N-t t Mn mrlNal b n.eY e. P.Irlm I.P.n r.mn m r«Y.. wr pall. e.1• I4rr r w�b.np d N�.Ib� r aoLn9. ). saes ..r.a NYn mw. I wa..oP..l r ration w.m.lmn a. NMxa+r d.ona PY coN .. Caw Gw] b IYrrrwllP: d WAlon b aWq. 10. conurnv. aaan. roap�,raaa 1rW n nY d mrr Y,a S.nYN. INTERIOR DOOR ASSEMKY t. RqN Naa9 noon a rpA oaa. :. oaw ra•. na•.1sr rmN. p ION op..oq aap.. Nw« aoanNw a I,.Ip.NN unr. wPlp.a. v.dy pads •a^mn: ro.w .ra rw Ya w,aW ]�ndnr. ` NG L.ran Sww. Mn e' NO.vt VS NOB tl runeM /vN, cyMbl.P inbaN Oda 4P AF F.b drWF.H d avY h'Yfy ndarW rrmYnl. modor- ad"" VS.rI«wA bd. DaaMpnN A- cTr�pr wn wN.r..4P Af.F. b a.rn.+.r d bNr IVYey p.*V wmro7 UN d O.AVV r.p. r Y Mp. Mh W..r. IY.rWY OWOrN Ilubwl. a. Dap Sea • carer. er.. Wvr..t2taelJ aan npp.bP rvYN pro-q.aaNrnl. RECITE REOUIReiviwIS 1, e4r1N r..blYnO.Ir d 3N•.31T M Fbd P n OY p.drl M yr.1.1H• sP. rlT.1 n.l.. AN e. tN• a3ew ae•H pnbYq WN, rm Tm.anN.re. t?.xw.4e•H IYnPYq y.x Tn.IFPmr YHb Rel.4 LW Wn NN. mlYon )Itr. T.)A'. vraW IYVN YIa ab pl.ox d cawp 1/tr. v.IMs Irplh. N meal W wN b prYWIrO b mYdl.wrlp II.WYI rb MIN' b b.rW.n by rdrrl orw. QeIL?=nG REQUIREMENTS I. GVlld A/N. 9lydre 2t4' WgrWM W wnlvW Ne[A- IN1r W. N.ryr prlL'9.IrbYE.) 2 9.WNc Wn ra0p.an FY wM. CASE3WRf{ I. srlr Ya Poo Ir.w mrNaN rwanp rm eYn.r roe. T ' USNb b.r xnN mrrlr pdN.na N bIP'be.Pn, rrn us oe... PaI. cola ro n..Ir].n.y..p.alcvo..w. 3. W..,.wn Prab.n. ma 9Ya. tw a M.IYbW cap n a ..ad.a Iry rdrrp owNF. a N C.rNPINI'.I in n Ann rb.awY b e�ar.A.crn aawaYNN. L�0 1. r z 4' FAIOr4N.r2 LIThI FIaF. rwa b uv b nbldi mpb p nbaYY VARY pedal MNd T Sw•Phlp 1`32TSIe35Je , ]. SWmk Wn Suprwa� Pp qa. SWIdra DY ma. UAO. e. Canst pM AmF. pr 1500 q R b N Y^Y9YbY N Iwr.d'pb UOI SWITCH 1, lMbn a.•w Ivory 11o1.at M.ri. p.eq n ddab 9YW po.. 4a AF F. err a w4A. EUECTwt'.LL WALL OUTLET 1lMOn9Wn.p.arl dipla r.ON1 Y.OR18t Nfgrrgrq. NoryIYl.ri ], EQH owllll W 1M wN dal 3. MaFNe q* r 1r AF,F. b NrrIM d d OATACOMMUNICATIONS OUTLET I. RN par.W N O.r10.F. 2. I.dy aa..Pa+. a dw. Fa"wa 3, PNAN (114mW N. rPl.n dPgoa O.dmoYn. Newry Y.Uw b M N. HEATING. NP UP- I1�+4 t. O..M Bra HYAC mwn. Ca.1aa n p'p+a. pulpy NHa b .rtnbtT. r.M. Con1'Kb bbb Y.pPIEaOM amp bOaa e..pn Is cavuvab, aM.rrYn. Ingo. nwnwlr baean. aYd+.d ovw.ppopl. FIRE PROTfCCPQN t. tN. LFr.uw.a rWr •I r .m rd urm A. Ld.aar rylwr. PYmv P1q-0p.pW a Frpw...saw.na r bpem. wY'p"FP w bd w'.rr �PPNI�o madam Y.dm er.pn..Fnw«w 4. PrWIN ImmYwb N n.. Yin nmalraUr b nYtro dMy b MW Nn.lpd Ian rN 9FP WY..rb .Imb u pr gpiradr cpN. e. PrpW 11.r dNda N Aa..rd mmafcnpv b.xpN oroJby b FLQQR CQYERWO REOUIREMENTB I CYPNVYey v.Nn Yd.rUa our RUBBER A@ �_F I Br. I nwpoAl Bwb �• nAe.r cPr. Ox. Oda b N NIFaNa M 2 R.we.o e. &--4, - Npa.a oeww.. WNL F-SES 1 ftr NYYWd. a qur Gmr. m n.wcNa Iry rdwFd� w.r 2. Tw min M Mra W. Wa p FOw. J. PrM Oa.I tau d tuna prlOon. WINDOW COVER�RG9 1. Vrey M arer BUILDING GENERAL INFORMATIONS LEGAL DESCRIPTI ALL THAT PORTION OF THE NIY QUARTER OF THE NW QUARTER OF SECTION 25. TOWNSHIP 27 NORTH, RANGE 3 EAST, W.M.. IN SNOHOMISH COUNTY. WASHINGTON, BEGINNING AT A POINT 99 FEET SOUTH OF THE NW CORNER OF SAIO SUBDIVISION; THENCE RUNNING EAST W FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAME LINE EAST 135 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 174 FEET: THENCE WEST 133 FEET; THENCE NORTH EXCEPT THE N08TH 40 FEET THEREOF SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS. RESTRICTIONS AND RESERVATIONS OF RECORD. TAX ACCOUNT P. DON 39 ODD 10000 SCOPE OF LOCATION MAP BUILDING SUMMARY PRW,F2T AQRRM 504 Holy Dine Eo . WA 90010 APPLICABLE CODES 8 ORDINANCES. 1. BUILDING CODES IBC 2003 1FC 2003 FGC 20M IMC 2003 WSEC 2003 UPC 2003 2. REGUUTIONS 8 ORDNWICES NFPA 3. ACCESSIOIUTY IBC Qh"" 11 "' AgHMi f b Ada.ary IMOJ) FEDERALREGUTATNJNSSAMERIC.WDISABLITIESACT (ADA) GENERAL BUILDING DESCRIPTION To. d Cnn.tnxmn: Val Wooe hone wM .Ivaa o.Ma FIn R-Sy~, SpvW.a O=pwcy Type: B 1 ONo •tr eaa R-2I CabaWn -2rm 83ra M. TpwnlUw: 8y R"Errs OaI ] 2aNn9 D.T,7- RM 36-PI PUD FIRE RESISTIVE CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENT. SNR Er Iorua. 2 Hw W S- Erlcl w 2 Hwn PROJECT STATISTICS: Sawn Fool.p.0(T.n.nt Sp 1,500 SF Canto apn Nu: 1.500 SF NwNw d Empaye..: 2 r,ae,)ywe Nw of DWNYW T.nrt On%%Pe," SpI u : 2 ep.m OF-" P.rblW a-, 71p.wa • 1 .pu..de epe0p (S.. 0Y AOn Aa~is p..g W,-) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: N-Shadow III- Town Fnpdnnwnl FNr PaNOan WAN, F W.Ibe RY0 - a Em.ON LV.V FwO... I�„�: w y .- i �I/ x nM.LRTY aaNNLN NaNTN K.KILtW ♦IM M1wrRL ww +ram• //////'''������,, / NS 7 6 8 4 3 L I ,rJ�� 1;1 �j / pR..IIb RDYliSD�b /(WLLNfYNIw i � wNWLT MAN. /�f/P rjJ i �LMTRY J � M1ANTae � 0 c.LG PA.[rTa'T (7NLUAYVAlR GIRL( em.ywN.rNlaa\FNa� j� o Z ii 1 I M1ANTL / A!/ aNRLRff NNLN. LN I IVNIVI x. �m NPRL M1NN• PROJECT TEAM'. DRAWING INDEX OWNER A4.1 COVERSHEETa PRDIFLT NIFOPANTION Pa L RichLad A.1 EMSTING FLOOR PlN1 RENMX CIwllpbne A 12 PROPOSED FLOOR3:lfiCTRIGL PLAN V55NAvrb.S A1I PROPOSEDREFLECIEOCEIUNGRAN EOTPM.. WA 9e0M A2.1 DETAILS Tr, 20B.W.'7M (Pr Lad) ARCHITECT 150 Lab S..d S. Sun 212 )Qh ,WA 98033 TN'. 425.827.9246 FY: 428A22.0239 AM_ Bob Ba PLUMBING ENGINEER: TOO - Bmmr Dmr GENERAL CONTRACTOR: Penl9rta ConalruDtlon MECHANICAL ENGINEER: 946 210th Ave NE TOO - BMeN O.Or Sammamleh, WA 96074 Tel: 206.285.4743 ELECTRICAL ENGINEER Fax 206.282.5612 TOO - S Deer D..Wn AIM, Bab Johrl.on FIREILIFE SAFETY ENGINEER: WA Llcenae: PANTEC'BSBBR TOO - BNer Do.Wn AFFTI:NOI e5 NoTrD _V OIGNEOINC STPNNT Lite IVAN17 or 9w , 2al 1 STREET FILE RECEIVED SFP 13 � on d'�r- 77 CRO65 -ler-LION r10 CRLYh t&cTmtrL Cl 40slb '5ECTKDW 4- 14 vo. 1 4, -/(Z III Bn•E &yr- VXZCMA PLACM A�, A I'Ir X4r-IrX -'--T T-12 T�.w �c /-yMo AS - BUILT, WE 11-41 'pup. see UGWV -027 FILE "T.LE COPY' CR-r. /I V- AV.. OjlMRWIQm; 201, -j 4 !0 KW CROSS -lEr-Tlom*'O CAME tk-c-TKY41t 'L ckny� LcTK"*l% CR--'b 'DECT00*115 azo-E-15 --'f-CTK)W t. 14 416-m 4 IyCK4, L S�k�N L�AA. ;N_�ZM Wrt" VKW Ar �JA. R�� R. 3-- jeo 1•••p4'4'•dK 4;v-.IT C>16T I AS 7WO' L40/1iOV —xwLMAm C dGC. L Is— BUVbl 7PAR15Fl] Wt xff UG#40- 1027 Rl FILE COVI FtTe 0 -tLQ t;" AK PU.Uc Usury. V. h Vt. 1-5il 5.11" w 4-6 me-, VAULT Zfr —4—. C.ro.:�LJIOVEF =.sMN! LETDN_. r-,-------- r- t..`. `'w •-� Y 9E' a� LOT 10 ( l$ % - I low DULPWdi, NOTE: As n",'W I rc / ' I � -- D. N[p. GJRP D►f/•IL � �•f�rA- bl r'IRs7 1'L� / I \ &0./ . �/ W G�IL. �G�4 C�1.wD5• ofLY. •. /'� oo\ i � rd.!p04A11�L/fAf+Y fry glonda sb... s.Ixl.bc —_ Ge. iirrl _ ij� tom' R<N FaK IAP�iaK _I0. 4rf �L►F �eNos — _ — S M 1 � •11-teHL GIrD.�w�SL��atT I � __ Tyr 17-1 e9l.1 Kp GctAl 1. N rrav d+rvac+rwrr; sce FYk f/t/.rMr, I yy�.ly P6T sAt Qom« 9/so t4. k{: Kersys n+wt bawd 6.�raro mnoit} kaotc Sri. ADO. W. yaw i�«s IY. f•� }itAklr fkiArwr - V1Mft1Q J76f1.1bf1►1A:4'? r.� r� s AaE B6.7S rl ".e+, swmAr E PLAN' m'tattdQiLMVOX.JM c Ps o i+WK rre.7s W i t ^AW L►x r ol" G - 4 A? f � /F//l�td //6.�5 1a.9►�>!`rp�w,rn"w+�,�s W"i,9— —--r=�—�.gwsc - -- — 1e.11u�W�� GLMR c+rW! N11Noi ��'. 1►aw1 „� /// ' W C a' SArr. swta O I•:' Q a. IL ' .L z RE:'�I I r WA-�FMArN p . 1 CNCISTOPH-15 'W-IA . Soo Ho//y Ck Am lo�9r STREET FILE S ATE PL/lN REcMrveo uO- .� it �•'��w. /�'e NOTE: PA.IN7E� �'G 1. .YY 1'1Y�Htf�bpS�NOfI�D —16� 11oLb 1•II,I.CD MR4 D�rMt �I W GONk ksiN^-a-17 �- Gt'DI' p" Rflt p+4�I1Di0K I, II�/� ry FM No 4y MMI Ra< L141111" IR 4 f• 1t � Rica 5.4 I4Wf. 11. CXr LAGTY-- M. I^1007 aFe n uwtc�rwr: sr IF la+MOMt IbObf •IKs++RNh• p.0+cwt VFIIN u8 tt ww1' p�ri cth�a�1��cn� e+xiM+�, cEM �G'1p� sA+ SITE PLAN (a�wtw�lhil'AP� �N SCALE: 1'.10'-0• ��Ni R LI _ RHCHIVED I' AUB1 ft ��°' uI. WASMMAiAI �� OIhyRR C HNC/ST�NK.<5 �•�t�'T 509 //o//p Qc 1908 # /a,7-9/ APPROVED BY ptA%''H1 G rS1� 4eaL.{ 1 •10' TYPICAL PAVEMENT SECTION 5 t h f ..«w. �.,•• � mru..a,....w .r.aa�raam I is r(aa.0 Gv.7 � i..r.�e�. r••..•..m.r a.. •. ...� r., .�. •.. CJ �] �..•sr..•+oa . r r r � r..rr . e. w =�.w, a W., .nor � 9fLi�W T %. Hf! VYWl,4 LOT •r .�. r • ••••4^...•,. r.' n • r w .e ....� ,soy � �. r.••�r ca a.. ••., m• ,. �-,wuT OODA r ^ a,.•.^ . ,.ra rr ••...... e...•,.....�., ��f )�L �$. �-'•`O�'G `^^"' .. VICINITY MAP w.•^ ,e q.Yf)eu+cro .u,r4 .vp (OY.4..o fn a•r( GPONT6GE wfpgONFj•IFI.(TS 1p f � ow we. e. M.4,p _ PRONUIlt IMMR &MNLNTe f,w M(6K a> �N't � u.r WruOwl I w cur r�r r n..o-xrw• •� '••r 4 ! � r.m w arrrrr •.ra wo^e wr •. aw 41T LYt �• , .uwry a v r M. ws ws VW VnH--- rI HIV FOR ANASTASIOS CHRISTOPHILIS ! IN NW A SECTION 25, T. 27N., R.3E, W.M. CITY OF EDMONDS SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON ®� Lovoll; au*! k Associaios• f c. ��■ s OpteMeWnryeL,A�wven.oGr,fnmync