No preview available
10/20/1987 City CouncilTHESE MINUTES SUBJECT TO NOVEMBER 2, 1987 APPROVAL EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL MINUTES OCTOBER 20, 1987 The regular meeting of the Edmonds City Council was called to order at 7 p.m. by Mayor Larry Naughten in the Plaza Meeting Room of the Edmonds Library. All present joined in the flag sa- lute. PRESENT STAFF PRESENT Larry Naughten, Mayor Jack Wilson, Council President John Nordquist Steve Dwyer Laura Hall Jo -Anne Jaech Bill Kasper Lloyd Ostrom Dan Marsh, Student Rep. Jim Barnes, Parks 8 Rec. Div. Mgr. Bob Alberts, City Engineer Bobby Mills, Public Works Supt. Art Housler, Admin. Svc. Director Jerry Hauth, Hydraulics Engineer Peter Hahn, Comm. Svc. Director Duane Bowman, Asst. City Planner Scott Snyder, City Attorney Jackie Parrett, City Clerk Margaret Richards, Recorder Council President Wilson introduced Council Resource Assistant Linda Martin and Student Represen- tative Dan Marsh from Edmonds High School. CONSENT AGENDA COUNCILMEMBER NORDQUIST MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER OSTROM, TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED. The approved items on the Consent Agenda include the following: (A) ROLL CALL (B) APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF OCTOBER 13, 1987 %till i (C) AUTHORIZATION TO ADVERTISE FOR BIDS FOR REPLACEMENT OF ANDERSON CENTER WINDOWS ($30,000) ,ram (D) AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD BID FOR 5TH AND WALNUT CORNER PARKS TO KLB CONSTRUCTION ($4,972.81) (E) ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT OF CLAIM FOR DAMAGES FROM DON AND ANN HERMAN ($580.71) AUDIENCE Mayor Naughten opened the audience portion of the meeting. Co�z Natalie Shippen, 1022 Euclid, inquired when the corner parks at 5th and Walnut will be complet- ed. Public Works Superintendent Bobby Mills said they will be completed by next week. Ms. Shippen inquired about the status of the lighting consultant and proposed schedule for the downtown area. Community Services Director Peter Hahn said a revised scope of services was re- cently mailed to the consultant, and he estimated time of completion between two to three months. Mr. Hahn said the project will be completed by the end of the year. The study will be submitted to the Council for review. Ms. Shippen noted that a plan is customarily adopted before funding is allocated for a continuous project. She said it would seem appropriate if the Council formally adopted the plan. Mayor Naughten closed the public portion of the meeting. IMPLEMENTATION OF WATER SUPPLY PLAN TO EASE DROUGHT RESTRICTIONS ON EDMONDS WATER USERS Mayor Naughten reported that the City of Edmonds obtains two-thirds of its water supply from Alderwood Water District and one-third from the Seattle Water Department. Because of the severe water shortage in Seattle, all Seattle Water Department customers have been requested to cease irrigation of outdoor plantings and to cut back on indoor uses as well. Mayor Naughten said the City has anticipated this stage of restrictions and has had a contingency plan ready which will allow Edmonds water users to continue usage at the present levels. The present restrictions are limited to outdoor irrigation on an every -other -day basis. Mayor Naughten said the City intends to temporarily purchase all .it its water supply from Alder - wood Water District. The current contract allows the City to do this without a formal agree- ment. The District Manager has assured the City that the addition of 1 to 1.5 million gallons a day will not pose any problems. Edmonds has agreed to reverse the situation immediately if un- foreseen problems do occur. Seattle has formally agreed to pay the additional costs (Alderwood water costs 50% more than Seattle water). Operations staff have determined that fire flows will not be impacted by the temporary switch. The Mayor said in addition to avoiding the imposition of greater restrictions on any Edmonds water users, this plan allows the City to have a uniform conservation plan for the entire City. It will assist Staff in notifying customers and answering questions. Mayor Naughten noted that because the worst drought in history has been declared, the City of Seattle has announced a level 4 water restriction. HEARING ON PLANNING BOARD RECOMMENDATION REGARDING REGULATIONS GOVERNING NONCONFORMING BUILDINGS Assistant City Planner Duane Bowman reported that for some time Staff has been experiencing prob- v Assistant with the City's regulations governing the extent of improvements that a homeowner may make to a nonconforming building. The present regulations restrict those improvements to 25% of the current assessed value of the structure. Mr. Bowman said the problem with limiting improvements to a nonconforming structure is that it oftentimes severely limits home owners from upgrading and improving their homes. They must ei- ther drastically revise their plans or make the improvements over a number of years. Mr. Bowman said the Planning Board has been discussing revision of the City's regulations govern- ing nonconforming buildings since late summer. The Board held public hearings on July 22, August 12, and August 26, 1987 to consider amendments to Section 17.40.020 of the Edmonds Community Development Code. He.noted that copies of those minutes were attached to the Council packets. Mr. Bowman said nonconforming buildings are unique due to their nonconforming nature. He said careful review should take place before alterations are allowed. Staff supports amendments to Section 17.40.020, provided a review provision is included in the amendment. Mr. Bowman reviewed the proposed amendments with the Council. Mr. Bowman said it is the recommendation of Staff to review any alteration or improvement to a nonconforming building which exceeds the current assessed valuation by more than 25%. Councilmember Jaech inquired if adjacent residents will be notified of any proposed improvements or alterations. Mr. Bowman replied affirmatively. He said a standard notice to residents within 80 feet of such a proposal will be sent. A Staff decision/optional hearing would then follow. He said if the Planning Board's or Staff's recommendation was adopted by the Council, a yellow notice would be mailed to the public who would then have two weeks to respond. If an objection was voiced, a Staff hearing would be posted and held. Councilmember Ostrom inquired if a home could be expanded in any direction so long as it did not extend beyond the required setbacks. Mr. Bowman replied affirmatively. Councilmember Wilson noted that the issue of view impact was not addressed in Staff's recommenda- tion. He said, however, that Mr. Bowman had stated at a Planning Board meeting that Staff would carefully review that issue. Mr. Bowman concurred. He noted that other Staff members also shared the same sentiment as he did. He pointed out that Section 17.40.020 (D) (4), Item N5, addressed the issue of view impact. In addition, a home owner who was dissatisfied with Staff's interpretation would have the option to appeal to the Hearing Examiner and, ultimately, the City Council. Mayor Naughten opened the public portion of the hearing. Ron Tracy, 8536 Frederick Place, said he recently discovered that his home was nonconforming when he made an application to the City to make improvements to his home. He said even though the improvements would not impact the neighbors, he cannot make those improvements because the present zoning regulations places restrictions on a nonconforming structure. Mr. Tracy urged the City Council to adopt the proposed amendments. Councilmember Ostrom inquired why Mr. Tracy's home was nonconforming. Mr. Bowman said it was nonconforming because Talbot Park was rezoned from RS-12 to RS-20 subsequent to purchase of Mr. Tracy's home and the setbacks were changed. EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 2 OCTOBER 20, 1987 Will Smith, 732 Bell Street, stated that the addition that he proposed to his home in the recent past was denied because it affected the view of his neighbors. He said he felt it was unfair to discriminate against a person who resided in a nonconforming structure when the same requirements are not imposed on new developments. He urged the Council to adopt the Planning Board's recommen- dation. Councilmember Kasper inquired if other local cities do not apply the 25% assessed valuation regu- lation. Mr. Smith said he did not believe so. Chris Keuss, 1041 - 9th Avenue South, urged the Council to adopt the amendments to the zoning code. He said he recently discovered that his home is a nonconforming structure, and he is un- able to complete the remodeling project unless the guidelines are modified. Mr. Keuss said the guidelines restrict the extent of remodeling that can be made and, thus, produces unsightly half - finished remodeling projects throughout the City. He said those unfinished homes do not enhance the aesthetic quality of the community. City Attorney Scott Snyder suggested the following amendments to the language: paragraph 2, line 2, do not expand any nonconforming aspect of the building"; paragraph 4, "The cost in any one year period of maintenance, repair, or alternations which affect a nonconforming aspect of the structure are allowed .". Mr. Snyder explained that the proposal reterred to nonconform- ing use; and use was not under consideration at that time. Councilmember Kasper inquired if the intent of the Planning Board in addressing the 25% valuation applied only to the expansion of a nonconforming structure. Jeff Palmer, Planning Board member, replied negatively. He said the changes as suggested by Mr. Snyder were in keeping with the Planning Board's recommendation. Councilmember Ostrom said he was uncomfortable with the wording of paragraph 2 and requested that it be reworded. Councilmember Jaech noted that 25% of the assessed valuation of the nonconforming portion of a structure would not allow a resident to make any necessary major repairs. Mr. Snyder said the intent of paragraph 2 referred to alternations and did not use the word "repair" or "remodel". Councilmember Jaech suggested that that section was clarified to avoid any misinterpretation. Councilmember Kasper expressed concern that new homes may be built closer to the 25 foot setback and homes adjacent to that home may chose to build even closer to the setback to capture the view. Mr. Bowman said that issue was separate from the Code amendments before the Council at the present time. He said as long as the proposed structure complies with setback and building height regulations, a building permit must be issued. He noted that the Planning Board has dis- cussed that issue and is in the process of trying to resolve it. Councilmember Dwyer inquired if the proposed amendments were modelled after some other city ordi- nance. Mr. Bowman replied negatively. Councilmember Dwyer inquired if Staff reviewed ordinances of other cities. Mr. Bowman replied affirmatively. He noted that cities have the authority to establish regulations governing nonconforming structures. Mr. Bowman said other local cities have adopted regulations similar to the Edmonds ordinance but with variations. Councilmember Dwyer said the proposed amendments were a "mishmash" of suggestions with no logical basis for distinguishing one application from another. He said he would not vote in favor of the proposed amendments. Councilmember Dwyer acknowledged, however, the necessity to amend the Code. Mayor Naughten closed the public portion of the hearing. COUNCILMEMBER KASPER MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER NORDQUIST, TO REMAND THE ISSUE TO THE PLAN- NING BOARD AND STAFF FOR FURTHER REVIEW. Councilmember Ostrom said the original intent of the ordinance was to phase out nonconforming structures. He noted that the recommendation did not address that issue. He recommended that further amendments address that issue. Councilmember Ostrom added that he was not convinced that the present ordinance was "wrong". Councilmember Jaech noted that some residents who purchased their homes in the past which were conforming at that time now find that their homes are nonconforming and are unable to make altera- tions or revisions. She recommended that further amendments address that issue so that residents are treated fairly. MOTION CARRIED. EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 3 OCTOBER 20, 1987 AUTHORIZE REVISION IN APPROVED PUBLIC WORKS UTILITIES COMPUTER ACQUISITION BUDGET $3 500/FUND �L�,�Uci 411 Councilmember Ostrom stepped down from the dais due to a conflict of interest. Community Services Director Peter Hahn reported that the Council had previously approved a person- al computer for Water/Sewer/Treatment plant applications. Staff was requested to research prices and specific vendors for that purchase as well as the larger group of PC's that was approved out of the General Fund. The Management Team recommended the purchase of the recently released IBM PS/2 line of personal computers, which was approved by the Council. His current request is predicated on the availability of new information that was unknown at the time of the Council discussions. The new IBM PS/2 line has four models: model 30, 50, 60, and 80. Model 30 was recommended by the Management Team as the basic model for City -wise uses. It is adequate for most PC applications and only costs a little more than a "dumb" System 36 termi- nal. Model 50 was recently recommended and approved for the Fund 411 utilities applications. However, in the interim, more information has become available on the new IBM line, as well as for specific applications. Staff has had a number of conversations with other users who have similar utilities applications, and Staff believes that the Model 80 will offer significant advan- tages in terms of cost effectiveness and performance for both the System 36 and the PC. A Model 50 will not only be inferior to the Model 80 but will not enable Staff to use some of the future applications for the utilities areas. Mr. Hahn said the Model 80 has sufficient memory so that the System 36 main frame would not need to be utilized for utilities applications. He said the expenditure of an additional $3,500 to purchase the Model 80 will provide greater flexibility; will free up capacity on the main frame System 36; and assure that future costs will be decreased. Councilmember Jaech inquired where the computer would be based if the request was granted. Mr. Hahn said the computer may be temporarily based in the Public Works Department or Engineering Division. Councilmember Jaech suggested that it be centrally located, i.e., the Community Servic- es Department, so that all employees would have access to it. Mr. Hahn noted that coaxial cables can be integrated with the existing system. Councilmember Nordquist inquired about the number of employees that would be required to operate the computer. Mr. Hahn said a new employee is proposed in the Public Works Department, and that employee could utilize the system for data entry. He recalled that only a few employees used the IBM 36 when it was first purchased. However, a number of employees have since learned to use the computer. Mr. Hahn added that GTE has computerized the Assessor's quarter section and section maps for Snohomish County in their computer. GTE has offered those maps to the City for a nominal fee, which could save the City a large sum of money ($75,000 to $100,000). Councilmember Wilson noted that the present computer system would be slowed down considerably when the water/sewer information was entered. Mr. Hahn concurred. Councilmember Wilson inquired if the Model 36 and Model 80 used the same chips. Mr. Hahn replied negatively. He noted, howev- er, that the chips are completely compatible. COUNCILMEMBER NORDQUIST MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER KASPER, TO APPROVE THE PROJECT BUDGET REVISION AND TO CANCEL THE ORDER FOR MODEL 50. MOTION CARRIED. HEARING AND RECOMMENDATION TO ADOPT SHELL CREEK/CHASE LAKE SUBBASIN STUDIES Richard, Schaffer, URS Corporation, submitted a report to the Council. v City Engineer Bob Alberts reported that on October 6, 1987, URS Corporation presented the Coun- cil with initial findings and recommendations regarding the Shell Creek/Chase Lake Subbasin Studies. He said URS will present the final reports that evening. The reports identify prob- lem areas, capital improvement projects, and potential funding sources. Staff believes the costs to implement the recommended capital costs for 1988 and 1989 will be $484,000 and $1,020,000 respectively. Some of the projects will be included in the proposed 1988 budget. Staff believes the improvements, as identified in the studies, are necessary and have reflected the improvements in a total City Capital Improvement Program. Mr. Schaffer said the intent of the studies was to develop coordinated plans for the management of surface and stormwater in the study areas. A three faceted approach was developed which resulted in a capital improvement program, an operations and maintenance program, and a financial program. Mr. Schaffer reviewed an aerial photograph which indicated the problem areas in the Chase Lake basin and Shell Creek basin as well as locations of capital improvements. He said the estimated capital improvement program for those basins was $1.04 million and $1.58 million respectively. EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 4 OCTOBER 20, 1987 Mr. Schaffer reviewed the scope of work, which involved twenty tasks which would be implemented in three phases: 1) information gathering and inventory of the existing drainage system; 2) com- puter modelling which entailed development and evaluation of alternative solutions; 3) develop- ment of the capital improvement program and 0 & M enhancement, as well as a finance plan. Mr. Schaffer said the primary problems in the Chase Lake basin are flooding and erosion sedimen- tation, as well as some pollution. Councilmember Ostrom inquired about the nature of the pollu- tants. Mr. Schaffer replied greases and oils from roadway products, litter, and improper dis- posal of household waste products. He said the primary problems in the Shell Creek basin are flooding and erosion. Mr. Schaffer said the proposed improvements involve construction of a detention system in Yost Park. Councilmember Hall inquired where the detention system would be located. Mr. Schaffer replied adjacent to Main Street. Mr. Schaffer reviewed the recommended improvements to Chase Lake and Shell Creek basins with the use of diagrams on the overhead projector. Shawn Pickett, URS Corporation, reported that various financing options were analyzed. He said he learned that Edmonds has historically funded drainage projects from Public Works funds. However, he said that source of funding would not support the kind of capital improvements that have been identified in the report, especially in light of the expansion of the treatment plant and bond issuance for street improvements. Mr. Pickett said the drainage utility approach was identified as a viable and optimal funding source because it allows financing flexibility and independence by enabling the City to charge its drainage customers a service fee based on the amount of runoff contributed to the overall system. It also allows identification and prioritiza- tion of capital and maintenance needs for the system and creates the funding stability necessary to address the utility infrastructure requirements. He said the drainage utility should be the primary revenue base but grants and loans should also be pursued. Mr. Pickett said there are three basic methods to rate structure under the utility approach: 1) impervious surface, 2) rational method (density of development method), and 3) flat fee. Mr. Pickett said a capital finance evaluation system model was developed for the program, and a range of rates were identified ranging from $1.75 per month of $4. Councilmember Ostrom inquired if the funding that the City currently allocates for drainage projects was calculated into the rate structure that was developed for the program. Mr. Pickett replied negatively. He said the figures were based on a worst case scenario. Council - member Ostrom inquired, then, if the rate structure could conceivably be lower. Mr. Pickett replied affirmatively. Mayor Naughten opened the public portion of the hearing. Phillip Sheets, 761 Daley Street, inquired when improvements to Daley Street would take place. Public Works Superintendent Bobby Mills said the work will be scheduled within the next two weeks. Mr. Sheets said he would prefer that a City-wide rate structure for the drainage project was implemented at the present time. Connie Adams, 752 Daley Street, said her residence is flooded several times every year. She said it was imperative that a funding source is identified so that the drainage program can be implemented. Ray Carveth, Chairman of the Citizens Advisory Committee, suggested that the Council adopt the Shell Creek/Chase Lake Subbasin Studies as submitted. Mr. Carveth said the Committee held a public forum on October 6, 1987. He said it was interest- ing to learn that the citizens were not interested in any further studies but were anxious to implement the program as soon as possible regardless of the rate structure. Mr. Carveth reported that the Water Quality Authority has recommended that all municipalities in the State of Washington develop some method of funding water quality issues because Federal funding will not be available in future years. Mr. Carveth said the Citizens Advisory Committee has recommended that an ongoing source of funding is identified to implement the program. Mr. Carveth cautioned the Council that the State is contemplating the requirement of a surface water or storm drainage permit for each municipality which may entail sampling of various non - point source pollutants. He said analyzing only a one liter bottle for one site will cost the City $1,300. EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 5 OCTOBER 20, 1987 Mayor Naughten inquired about the disposition of the Citizens Advisory Committee in the future. Mr. Carveth said the Committee intends to continue to gather information and disseminate that information to the public. He asked the Council to consider allocating $500 per year for that purpose. Mayor Naughten thanked the Committee for its endeavors. Mayor Naughten closed the public portion of the hearing. COUNCILMEMBER NORDQUIST MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER WILSON, TO ADOPT THE SHELL CREEK/CHASE LAKE SUBBASIN STUDIES. Councilmember Dwyer and Councilmember Kasper said they would like an opportunity to review the report. A ROLL CALL VOTE WAS TAKEN. MOTION FAILED WITH COUNCILMEMBER JAECH, COUNCILMEMBER NORDQUIST, AND COUNCILMEMBER WILSON IN FAVOR; COUNCILMEMBER DWYER, COUNCILMEMBER HALL, COUNCILMEMBER KASPER, AND COUNCILMEMBER OSTROM OPPOSED. The issue was scheduled for further review and adoption on November 2, 1987. MAYOR Mayor Naughten said Bobby Joe Edmonds visited the City that morning to promote the United Way Kick -Off of employees. Mayor Naughten noted that it was necessary to sign the HUD Block Grant application that evening. Community Services Director Peter Hahn said the application was the accompanying interlocal agree- ment. Councilmember Jaech inquired if the City Attorney had reviewed the agreement. City Attor- ney Scott Snyder replied negatively. He said he would be happy to review it at that time. Mayor Naughten said Mr. Snyder had requested that an Executive Session be held following the agenda to discuss a legal issue. Mayor Naughten.noted that a liquor license application transfer from Petosa's Family Grocery to Edmonds Family Grocery at 5th Avenue was pending. He inquired if any Councilmember objected to the transfer. No objection was noted. Mayor Naughten said the City received a letter from the Washington State Liquor Control Board that the Circle "K" convenience store at 212th had intended to withdraw their liquor license application but never did. He said the store is reactivating their previous application. Mayor Naughten read the minutes of the Council meeting in which that application was discussed. He said Councilmember Nordquist suggested at that meeting that the City notify the State that it received signatures from petitioners from residents of the surrounding area opposing the liquor application and Councilmember Ostrom concurred. Councilmember Dwyer suggested that the City continue to forward the objections of the residents and the Council concurred. COUNCIL Council President Wilson welcomed Council Resource Assistant Linda Martin to the City. Council President Wilson inquired if the Council wished to schedule the next Council meeting on November 2, 1987 rather than on Tuesday, the 3rd because of the general election. COUNCILMEMBER DWYER MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER OSTROM, TO SCHEDULE THE NEXT COUNCIL MEETING ON NOVEMBER 2, 1987. MOTION CARRIED. Council President Wilson reminded the Council that the first budget work meeting was scheduled on November 7th at 8:30 a.m. to discuss the revenue expense summary. Councilmember Kasper noted that there will be some high demands on next year's budget because of some major projects which he believed were all worthwhile. He said it behooved the Council to commence discussion of those proposals, noting that some of the projects may have to be phased in over a period of several years. Councilmember Hall said the Administrative Services Committee was awaiting an invitation to sit in on the current audit exit review. Administrative Services Director Art Housler said it will probably be another week or so before the review is scheduled. Mayor.Naughten noted that Mr. Snyder had reviewed the HUD Block Grant interlocal agreement. Mr. Snyder said he approved the agreement as to form. COUNCILMEMBER KASPER MOVED, SECONDED BY COUN- CILMEMBER OSTROM, TO APPROVE THE SNOHOMISH COUNTY HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT CONSORTIUM INTERLOCAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT FOR THE PERIOD JULY 1, 1988 TO JUNE 30, 1991. MOTION CARRIED. EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 6 OCTOBER 20, 1987 * Public Works Superintendent Bobby Mills said the Boys' Club has been in the process of renovation for approximately one year, but the work has been ceased because asbestos was discovered in the building. He requested Council approval to retain Alfa Insulation to insulate the building at a cost of approximately $6,000. COUNCILMEMBER HALL MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER WILSON, TO AUTHORIZE ALFA INSULATION TO INSULATE THE BOYS' CLUB AT A COST OF APPROXIMATELY $6,000. MOTION CARRIED. The meeting recessed to an Executive Session to discuss a legal matter for approximately five minutes. These minutes are subject to November 2, 1987 approval. JA UEL E G.. PARRET, City Clerk See Council Minutes of November 2, 1987 4�5 !�� ? - LAR Y S. LIGHTEN, Mayor 7 "� EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 7 OCTOBER 20, 1987 AGENDA EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL PLAZA MEETING ROOM -LIBRARY BUILDING CALL TO ORDER rl n n r . � . - 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 7:0-0 10:00 P.M. OCTOBER 20, 1987 CONSENT AGENDA (A) ROLL CALL (B) APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF OCTOBER 13, 1987 (C) AUTHORIZATION TO ADVERTISE FOR BIDS FOR REPLACEMENT OF ANDERSON CENTER WINDOWS ($30,000) (D) AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD BID FOR 5TH AND WALNUT CORNER PARKS TO KLB CONSTRUCTION ($4,972.81) (E) ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT OF CLAIM FOR DAMAGES FROM DON AND ANN HERMAN ($580.71) AUDIENCE IMPLEMENTATION OF WATER SUPPLY PLAN TO EASE DROUGHT RESTRICTIONS ON EDMONDS WATER USERS HEARING ON PLANNING BOARD RECOMMENDATION REGARDING REGULATIONS GOVERNING NON -CONFORMING BUILDINGS AUTHORIZE REVISION IN APPROVED PUBLIC WORKS UTILITIES COMPUTER ACQUISITION BUDGET ($3,500--FUND 411) HEARING ON AND RECOMMENDATION TO ADOPT SHELL CREEK/CHASE LAKE SUBBASIN STUDIES MAYOR COUNCIL THE PUBLIC IS INVITED TO ATTEND PARKING AND MEETING ROOMS ARE HANDICAPPED ACCESSIBLE ( 5 MINUTES) (30 MINUTES) (10 MINUTES) (60 MINUTES)