The URL can be used to link to this page

2026-02-24 Council PacketEdmonds City Council Agenda February 24, 2026 Page 1 Agenda Edmonds City Council Regular Meeting Council Chambers 250 5TH AVE NORTH, EDMONDS, WA 98020 ZOOM: HTTPS://ZOOM.US/J/95798484261 PHONE: +1 253 215 8782 MEETING ID: 957 9848 4261 FEBRUARY 24, 2026, 6:00 PM 1. CALL TO ORDER / FLAG SALUTE 2. LAND ACKNOWLEDGMENT We acknowledge the original inhabitants of this place, the Sdohobsh (Snohomish) people and their successors the Tulalip Tribes, who since time immemorial have hunted, fished, gathered, and taken care of these lands. We respect their sovereignty, their right to self-determination, and we honor their sacred spiritual connection with the land and water. 3. ROLL CALL 4. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA 5. PRESENTATION 1. Proclamation of Lunar New Year Only One Reading Required – Mayor’s Office (5 min.) 2. Mayor's Finance Update – (5 minutes) 6. AUDIENCE COMMENTS This is an opportunity to comment regarding any matter not listed on the agenda as closed record review or as a public hearing. Speakers are limited to three minutes. Please state clearly your name and city of residence. If attending via Zoom, raise a virtual hand to be recognized. If using a phone to dial in, press *9 to raise a hand. When prompted, press *6 to unmute. 7. RECEIVED FOR FILING 1. Preliminary December 2025 Monthly Financial Report 2. Claim for Damages for filing 3. Outside Boards and Committees Reports 8. APPROVAL OF THE CONSENT AGENDA Edmonds City Council Agenda February 24, 2026 Page 2 1. Approval of City Council Meeting Minutes (Only One Reading Required) 2. Approval of PSA for Water Comprehensive Plan Update (Second Reading) 3. Approval of claim checks and wire payments. (First Reading) 4. Approval of payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire payments (Only One Reading Required) 5. Parks Maintenance Worker Position Conversion (Second Reading) 9. COUNCIL BUSINESS 1. 2026 Tree Code Updates, Project #AMD2025-0006 (First Reading) – Planning and Development Services (30 minutes) 2. City Council Resolution Establishing Priorities and Governance, Financial Stability, and Community Outcomes (Second Reading) – City Council Office (30 minutes) 3. Removal of Mayor's Finance Update (First Reading) – City Council Office (10 minutes) 10. COUNCIL COMMENTS 11. MAYOR'S COMMENTS ADJOURNMENT For disability accommodations, materials in alternate formats, accessibility information, or language interpretation/ translation needs, please contact the City Clerk at 425-775-2525 at your earliest opportunity. Providing at least 72-hour notice will help ensure availability. 5 3 8 City Council Agenda Item 5.1 February 24, 2026 - Regular Meeting TITLE:Proclamation of Lunar New Year (Only One Reading Required) DEPARTMENT:Mayor's Office PRESENTER:Mayor Rosen NEEDED FROM COUNCIL:Informational RECOMMENDATION:Mayor Rosen will read a proclamation in honor of Edmonds Lunar New Year celebration for the Year of the Horse. The proclamation will be received by leaders of the Multicultural Association of Edmonds, Nikki Okimoto Glaros and Karin Mei Butler. BUDGET: Total Dollar Amount:0 ☐ Approved in Budget Fund(s):N/A ☐ Budget Reallocation Required ☒ No Budget Impact PROBLEM/ISSUE STATEMENT: N/A CONTEXT, ANALYSIS, & ALTERNATIVES: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Mayor Rosen will read a proclamation in honor of Edmonds Lunar New Year celebration for the Year of the Horse. The proclamation will be received by leaders of the Multicultural Association of Edmonds, Nikki Okimoto Glaros and Karin Mei Butler. BUDGET IMPACTS: N/A ITEM HISTORY: N/A ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: ATTACHMENTS: Proclamation for Lunar New Year Edmonds 2026 Item 5.1 Packet pg. 3/223 Item 5.1 Packet pg. 4/223 City Council Agenda Item 7.1 February 24, 2026 - Regular Meeting TITLE:Preliminary December 2025 Monthly Financial Report (Second Reading) DEPARTMENT:Finance PRESENTER:Richard Gould NEEDED FROM COUNCIL:Informational RECOMMENDATION:Received for Filing BUDGET: Total Dollar Amount:0 ☐ Approved in Budget Fund(s):N/A ☐ Budget Reallocation Required ☒ No Budget Impact PROBLEM/ISSUE STATEMENT: N/A CONTEXT, ANALYSIS, & ALTERNATIVES: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Received for Filing BUDGET IMPACTS: N/A ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: ATTACHMENTS: Preliminary December 2025 Monthly Financial Report Item 7.1 Packet pg. 5/223 CITY OF EDMONDS DECEMBER 2025 FINANCIAL REPORT FY 2025 December December 31, 2025 Pre l i m i n a r y Item 7.1 Packet pg. 6/223 1 Table of Contents Financial Status Analysis .............................. 2 Monthly Highlights ...................................... 4 2025-2026 Biennial Budget Summary ......... 5 All Funds Financial Summary ....................... 6 Cash and Investments Reconciliation .......... 7 General Fund Summaries ............................ 8 Development Services Revenue Summary 10 Major Revenue Summaries ....................... 11 All Revenue Summary ............................... 14 All Expenditure Summary .......................... 15 Salaries and Benefits Summaries .............. 16 Debt Summary ........................................... 20 Interfund Loan Summary ........................... 21 Investment Portfolio Summary ................. 22 General Fund Cash Flow Report ................ 24 Parks & Recreation Capital Projects .......... 25 Public Works Capital Project ..................... 26 Appendix A ................................................ 27 Pre l i m i n a r y Item 7.1 Packet pg. 7/223 2 *See Exhibit A regarding Capital Projects delays. 2025 December/Report - Financial Status Analysis The following analysis concerns the December-2025 financial report. Provided is a summary of financial activity through December 31st. The total fund balance has increased by $7.7m as of December 31st. In the 2025 amended budget the City is projected to see a decrease in fund balance of $17.2m (adjusted for the May budget amendment) by year end. Looking at the “All Funds Financial” summary statement you can see that the most significant reasons for this current difference can be found in the General Fund ($2.5m), REET Funds ($2.3m), Gifts Catalog Fund (1.7m) and Sewer Wastewater Treatment Plant ($3.3m). The following comments highlight other significant activity in 2025: • Interest Income continues to decline from 2024 (as of this date), down 4.3% (approximately 130k). This is due to 2 factors: (1) Multiple bonds with higher (over 4%) interest rates maturing and (2) Interest rates dropping nearly .7% from last year at this time. The Local Government Investment Pool (LGIP) is earning 3.73% as of February 8th whereas it is difficult to purchase long-term bonds near 3.5% for 2–3-year bonds to complete the City’s investment portfolio. • Labor costs as of December 31st YTD (year to date) The vacant but funded employee count of 26.25 employees (as of December 8th) comprises 10.4% of the entire staff. However, some of these positions were on staff during 2025. That, combined with payouts (from staff that departed the city) is why labor costs are under budget by near 9%. The General Fund is over budget in four (down from six) departments, from 6 to 14%. These departments exceeded budget due to payouts brought on by retirements and layoffs. Staff does attempt to budget for these payouts but due to layoffs we underestimated the amounts in 2025. However, the General Fund is under budget for the entire fund as of the end of December (7%). • Revenues & Expenditures - The “All Revenue Summary” shows that the City of Edmonds surpassed expectations at 102%. The 2025 budget is 16% ($21m) under budget in expenditures as can be seen in the “All Expenditure Summary”. While this is good news, much of it is due to the utility and road funds which are significantly under budget. Staff shortages and the delay in starting or completing capital projects are the primary causes. The General Fund exceeds budgeted fund balance reserve expectations. Remember though that is still work-in-progress as we process yearend as we prepare for the coming State Audit in June. • Sales Tax trending - December sales taxes were down by 2.6% ($26k) from 2024. This brings 2025 in total down by .05% ($5,518) from 2024. This confirms modified sales tax budget expectations for 2026 to match that of 2025, a decrease of $1.3m. This could trend lower depending on the next few months of sales tax receipts. We did receive January’s for 2026, and it is up from 2025 by 3.2% ($31k). • Development Services – exceeded expectations by (27%). However, it is down from 2024 by 7% ($166k). This is due to reduced activities somewhat beyond our control (permitting etc.). Included with this report are the Parks and Public Works Capital Projects reports used for tracking by the Finance Department. In a joint effort with Public Works, we are providing information and data on which projects were delayed and why. This is included in Exhibit “A”. Please let me know if you have any questions. I look forward to discussing this with you at the Committee Meeting on February 17th. Thank you. Richard A. Gould Finance Director Pre l i m i n a r y Item 7.1 Packet pg. 8/223 3 EXHIBIT “A” (1) Positive numbers = funds not spent (budget). (2) Negative numbers = was over budget for the project but not the fund. 2025 --> 2026 Budget Modification Reason E20CB i052 76th Overlay (1,814.55) Complete E22CE i067 Hwy 99 Stage 3 1,149,999 Delayed - WSDOT added bike lanes corridor wide/complete streets, delaying land purchases for additional right of way needs. Completion estimated to be 2029. E22CF i068 Hwy 99 Stage 4 516,726 Delayed - WSDOT added bike lanes corridor wide/complete streets, delaying land purchases for additional right of way needs. Completion estimated to be 2030. E22CG i069 SR104 Adaptive 53,039 Delayed. 60% design complete. Need grant funds to proceed further. E23CF i078 Main St Overlay (29,051) Complete E24AA i089 2024 Traffic Calming 47,450 Complete E25AA i098 2025 Traffic Calming (51,974) On Schedule 2026 Traffic Calming Program - On Schedule 84th Ave. W Traffic Calming On Schedule E24AD s037 Safety Action Plan 74,000 On Schedule E25AB i099 2025 Pedestrian Sfty (77,523) On Schedule 2026 Pedestrian Safety Program - On Schedule 2026 Traffic Signal Upgrades - On Schedule E24CE i092 88th Overlay 313,480 Delayed due to lack of staffing. Construction estimated to be complete Spring 2026. E25CA i093 2025 Overlay 515,973 Delayed due to lack of staffing. Construction estimated to be complete Spring 2026. E25CF i101 OVD Overlay 147,934 Delayed due to lack of staffing. Construction estimated to be complete Spring 2026. E25DA i102 7th Ave Ped Impr - On Schedule E26CA i103 2026 Overlay - On Schedule 2027 Overlay - On Schedule 76th Ave. W Overlay Hwy 99-220 On Schedule 2,658,238 Utility Rate Study On Schedule E22JB m160 Yost & Seaview 4,725,000 Delayed due to lack of staffing. Construction estimated to be complete 2027. E24JA c621 Phase 15 Waterline 72,983 Complete Phase 17 Waterline - On Schedule 2027 Water Comp Plan Update - On Schedule E24MB c626 PW UST Replacement 133,480 Delayed due to lack of staffing. Construction estimated to be complete 2027. E6FD s017 Stormwater Comp Plan 66,097 Delayed due to lack of staffing. Completion estimated to be 2026. E20FC c552 PerrinvilleCreekFlow - Complete E21FE c564 SR104 Edmonds Marsh 273,928 Delayed due to additional WSDOT permit Requirements. New estimated completion 2026. E24FC c625 Edmonds Marsh Ph2 320,840 Delayed due to additional WSDOT permit Requirements. New estimated completion 2026. E22FB a157 Perrinville Crk Rest 350,000 Delayed due to not receiving needed grants. Estimated completion will be dependent on receiving grants. E24CD i088 2024 SD Overlays - Complete E24FA c620 Phase 5 Storm Maint 694,000 Delayed due to lack of staffing. Construction estimated to be complete late 2026/early 2027. Phase 6 Storm Maint (280,500) On Schedule Phase 7 Storm Maint - On Schedule E24FB c623 Perr Basin Anlsys - On Schedule E24FE s038 Edm Marsh Planning 12,022 On Schedule E25 s039 CARA Study - Delayed due to lack of staffing. Estimated completion date to be late 2026/early 2027. E23GA c580 Phase 11 Sewerline 176,959 Complete E24CC i087 2024 Sewer Overlays - Complete E24GA c622 Phase 12 Sewer 806,000 Delayed due to lack of staffing. Construction estimated to be complete late 2026/early 2027. Phase 14 Sewer On Schedule E23GC c601 Phase 4 SS CIPP - Complete Sewer Comp Plan Update (8,840) On Schedule 7,341,867 10,000,106 Project #'s Roads Capital Utilities Capital Pre l i m i n a r y Item 7.1 Packet pg. 9/223 4 MONTHLY HIGHLIGHTS GENERAL FUND HIGHLIGHTS • Sales Tax is down $(5,518) from this point last year and was $(852,966) under the total 2025 budgeted amount of $12,577,29. • Real Personal/Property Tax revenues are up $308,073 from this point in time last year, and EMS Property Tax revenues are up $117,277 from this point in time last year. This is due to the 1% increase in taxes from 2024 to 2025. • Real Estate Excise Tax is up $455,326 from this point last year and was $931,891 over the total 2025 budgeted amount of $3,000,000. • Gas Utility Tax is up $113,739 from this point in time last year and was $208,824 over the total 2025 budgeted amount of $680,000. • Electric Utility Tax is up $99,575 from this point last year but was $(46,577) under the total 2025 budgeted amount of $2,025,000. • General Fund Interfund Loan – All $6M of the approved $6M interfund loan from the Utilities to the General Fund has been utilized. Interest to be charged to the General Fund for this loan in 2025 totals $266,068. • Salaries and Benefits City-Wide were $(3,361,660) less than 2024; with the General Fund being less by $(3,303,426). Through December, we expended $29,953,515 which is $(2,152,378) less than was budgeted for 2025. This is due to leaving additional approved and funded positions vacant in 2025. Sales Tax Property Tax EMS Tax Other Taxes Actual 11,724,263 11,543,377 4,413,195 9,104,176 Budget 12,577,229 11,532,000 4,404,000 8,626,694 - 2,000,000 4,000,000 6,000,000 8,000,000 10,000,000 12,000,000 14,000,000 Ax i s T i t l e General Fund Tax Revenue (2025 YTD) Source 2025 Amended Budget 12/31/2024 Revenues 12/31/2025 Revenues Amount Remaining % Received TAXES $ 37,139,923 $ 35,829,277 $ 36,785,011 $ 354,912 99% LICENSES AND PERMITS 1,867,670 2,264,767 2,093,652 (225,982)112% INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUES 1,155,535 1,904,678 1,479,640 (324,105)128% CHARGES FOR GOODS AND SERVICES 8,633,119 7,968,872 7,864,954 768,165 91% FINES AND PENALTIES 2,888,000 584,607 2,023,781 864,219 70% MISCELLANEOUS REVENUES 901,838 1,026,594 927,773 (25,935)103% OTHER INCREASES IN FUND RESOURCES 6,000,000 - 6,000,000 - 100% OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 580,000 485,274 108,822 471,178 19% 59,166,085$ 50,064,069$ 57,283,633$ 1,882,452$ 97% REVENUES - GENERAL FUND - BY SOURCE IN SUMMARY Pre l i m i n a r y Item 7.1 Packet pg. 10/223 5 001 General Fund 1,336,357$ 110,525,025$ 57,283,633$ 53,241,392$ 109,490,376$ 54,794,334$ 54,696,042$ 2,371,006$ 3,825,656$ 009 LEOFF Medical Insurance Reserve Subfund 19,441 550,000 305,000 245,000 629,000 337,997 291,003 (59,559) (13,556) 011 Risk Management Reserve Fund - - - - - - - - - 012 Contingency Reserve Fund 2,228,672 - - - - - - 2,228,672 2,228,672 014 Historic Preservation Gift Fund 4,559 - - - 11,400 - 11,400 (6,841) 4,559 016 Building Maintenance Fund 2,380,534 194,410 78,752 115,658 2,714,068 254,443 2,459,625 (139,124) 2,204,843 017 Marsh Restoration & Preservation Fund 861,616 - - - 85,720 - 85,720 775,896 861,616 018 Edmonds Homelessness Response Fund 200,000 - - - 196,425 109,335 87,090 3,575 90,665 019 Edmonds Opioid Response Fund 456,556 100,000 77,004 22,996 450,000 - 450,000 106,556 533,560 Total General Fund 7,487,735 111,369,435 57,744,389 53,625,046 113,576,989 55,496,109 58,080,880 5,280,181 9,736,015 104 Drug Enforcement Fund 47,981 9,400 2,812 6,588 40,000 1,150 38,850 17,381 49,642 111 Street Fund 177,530 4,885,000 2,428,429 2,456,571 5,374,146 1,974,208 3,399,938 (311,616) 631,751 112 Street Construction Fund 3,211,126 12,153,779 2,786,325 9,367,454 11,206,049 2,122,618 9,083,431 4,158,856 3,874,833 117 Municipal Arts Acquisition Fund 671,730 548,241 174,683 373,558 768,927 226,031 542,896 451,044 620,383 120 Hotel/Motel Tax Fund 165,422 258,410 141,307 117,103 290,000 172,927 117,073 133,832 133,802 121 Employee Parking Permit Fund 12,691 110,290 12,576 97,714 65,173 2,002 63,171 57,808 23,265 122 Youth Scholarship Fund 20,769 4,750 1,786 2,964 6,000 300 5,700 19,519 22,255 123 Tourism Promotional Arts Fund 151,599 57,970 53,003 4,967 84,800 29,555 55,245 124,769 175,047 125 REET 2 2,432,519 3,787,950 2,141,175 1,646,775 3,047,939 900,751 2,147,188 3,172,530 3,672,943 126 REET 1 4,631,092 4,043,320 2,265,751 1,777,569 4,054,434 1,655,205 2,399,229 4,619,978 5,241,638 127 Gifts Catalog Fund 3,027,911 677,940 2,146,978 (1,469,038) 1,298,953 421,957 876,996 2,406,898 4,752,932 130 Cemetery Maintenance/Imp. Fund 130,453 675,719 535,906 139,813 671,945 282,282 389,663 134,227 384,078 137 Cemetery Maintenance Fund 1,269,638 183,761 87,829 95,932 311,124 272,174 38,950 1,142,275 1,085,293 138 Sister City Commission Fund 17,896 17,540 6,071 11,469 14,800 - 14,800 20,636 23,967 140 Business Improvement District Fund 34,037 158,418 76,390 82,028 173,320 84,393 88,927 19,135 26,034 141 Affordable Housing Fund 380,831 130,000 70,082 59,918 - - - 510,831 450,913 142 Edmonds Rescue Plan Fund 833 - 9,167 (9,167) - - - 833 10,000 143 Tree Fund 135,348 141,761 312,125 (170,364) 150,000 67,642 82,358 127,109 379,831 Total Special Revenue Funds 16,519,406 27,844,249 13,252,394 14,591,856 27,557,610 8,213,195 19,344,415 16,806,045 21,558,604 DE B T SE R V I C E FU N D S 231 2012 LTGO Debt Service Fund - 607,060 306,203 300,858 607,760 306,203 301,558 (700) - CA P I T A L PR O J E C T FU N D S 332 Parks Capital Construction Fund 299,964 684,482 151,499 532,983 237,035 28,279 208,756 747,411 423,184 411 Combined Utility Operations - - 141,155 (141,155) - - - - 141,155 421 Water Utility Fund 19,604,419 26,894,575 13,619,670 13,274,905 41,237,970 17,349,876 23,888,094 5,261,024 15,874,212 422 Storm Utility Fund 11,007,902 21,348,402 8,737,227 12,611,175 22,972,678 9,584,044 13,388,634 9,383,626 10,161,085 423 Sewer/WWTP Utility Fund 16,635,982 39,829,016 19,534,848 20,294,168 40,183,053 16,254,468 23,928,585 16,281,945 19,916,362 424 Utility Debt Service Fund - 2,323,310 1,149,487 1,173,823 2,297,790 1,149,369 1,148,421 25,520 119 Total Enterprise Funds 47,248,302 90,395,303 43,182,387 47,212,916 106,691,491 44,337,757 62,353,734 30,952,114 46,092,932 511 Equipment Rental Fund 5,380,342 4,889,190 2,917,663 1,971,527 4,121,587 1,961,576 2,160,011 6,147,945 6,336,429 512 Technology Rental Fund 906,736 5,056,171 2,408,754 2,647,417 5,010,600 1,932,533 3,078,067 952,307 1,382,957 Total Internal Service Funds 6,287,078 9,945,361 5,326,417 4,618,944 9,132,187 3,894,109 5,238,078 7,100,252 7,719,386 77,842,485$ 240,845,890$ 119,963,288$ 120,882,602$ 257,803,072$ 112,275,652$ 145,527,420$ 60,885,303$ 85,530,121$ 2025-2026 BIENNIAL BUDGET SUMMARY - ALL FUNDS GE N E R A L F U N D SP E C I A L R E V E N U E F U N D S EN T E R P R I S E FU N D S IN T E R N A L S E R V I C E F U N D S 2025 Prelimimary Ending Fund Balance TOTAL 2025 Beginning Fund Balance 2025-2026 Adopted Revenue Budget 2025 Actual Revenues Period 1-12 2025-2026 Adopted Expense Budget 2025 Actual Expenses Period 1-12Fund 2025-2026 Remaining Budgeted Revenues 2025-2026 Remaining Budgeted Expenses 2026 Estimated Ending Fund Balance Pre l i m i n a r y Item 7.1 Packet pg. 11/223 6 City of Edmonds All Funds Financial Summary As of December 31, 2025 Fund Beginning Fund Balance* Revenues / Sources Expenditures / Uses Revenues less Expenditures Ending Fund Balance Governmental 001 General Fund 1,336,357 57,283,633 54,794,334 2,489,299 3,825,656 009 LEOFF Medical Insurance Reserve 19,441 305,000 337,997 (32,997) (13,556) 012 Contingency Reserve 2,228,672 - - - 2,228,672 014 Historic Sub-Fund 4,559 - - - 4,559 016 Building Maintenance 2,380,534 78,752 254,443 (175,691) 2,204,843 017 Marsh Restoration 861,616 - - - 861,616 018 Homeless Response 200,000 - 109,335 (109,335) 90,665 019 Opioid Response 456,556 77,004 - 77,004 533,560 Total General Funds 7,487,735 57,744,389 55,496,109 2,248,280 9,736,015 Special Revenue Funds 104 Drug Enforcement 47,981 2,812 1,150 1,662 49,642 111 Street 177,530 2,428,429 1,974,208 454,221 631,751 112 Street Construction 3,211,126 2,786,325 2,122,618 663,707 3,874,833 117 Municipal Arts 671,730 174,683 226,031 (51,347) 620,383 120 Hotel / Motel 165,422 141,307 172,927 (31,620) 133,802 121 Employee Parking 12,691 12,576 2,002 10,574 23,265 122 Youth Scholarship 20,769 1,786 300 1,486 22,255 123 Tourism Promotion 151,599 53,003 29,555 23,448 175,047 125 REET 2 2,432,519 2,141,175 900,751 1,240,424 3,672,943 126 REET 1 4,631,092 2,265,751 1,655,205 610,546 5,241,638 127 Gifts Catalog 3,027,911 2,146,978 421,957 1,725,020 4,752,932 130 Cemetery Maintenance 130,453 535,906 282,282 253,624 384,078 137 Cemetery Trust 1,269,638 87,829 272,174 (184,345) 1,085,293 138 Sister City 17,896 6,071 - 6,071 23,967 140 Business Improvement 34,037 76,390 84,393 (8,004) 26,034 141 Affordable Housing 380,831 70,082 - 70,082 450,913 142 Edmonds Rescue 833 9,167 - 9,167 10,000 143 Tree Fund 135,348 312,125 67,642 244,483 379,831 Capital Projects 299,964 151,499 28,279 123,220 423,184 Debt Service - 306,203 306,203 - - Enterprise Funds 411 Combined Utility Operation - 141,155 - 141,155 141,155 421 Water Utility 19,604,419 13,619,670 17,349,876 (3,730,207) 15,874,212 422 Storm Water Utility 11,007,902 8,737,227 9,584,044 (846,817) 10,161,085 423 Sewer / Wastewater Treatment Plant 16,635,982 19,534,848 16,254,468 3,280,380 19,916,362 424 Bond Reserve Fund - 1,149,487 1,149,369 119 119 Internal Service Funds 511 Equipment Rental 5,380,342 2,917,663 1,961,576 956,087 6,336,429 512 Technology Rental 906,736 2,408,754 1,932,533 476,221 1,382,957 All Funds 77,842,485 119,963,288 112,275,652 7,687,636 85,530,121 *All Beginning Fund Balance amounts reflect the ending balances from the unaudited 2024 Financial Statements. $200,000 of the Fund Balance in Fund 126 has been reserved for Marsh Restoration Funding, as well as $1,200,000 for the purchase of Open Space. $250,000 of the Fund Balance in Fund 422 has been reserved for Marsh Restoration Funding. Pre l i m i n a r y Item 7.1 Packet pg. 12/223 7 INSTRUMENT TYPE PURCHASE DATE PURCHASE PRICE YIELD TO MATURITY MATURITY DATE ANNUALIZED INTEREST Farmer Mac 4/21/2023 1,994,172.00 4.060%2/2/2026 80,963.38 FHLMC 10/5/2023 993,661.24 5.050%7/22/2026 50,179.89 Farmer Mac 10/5/2023 2,057,309.31 4.910%11/17/2026 101,013.89 US Treasury Note 6/5/2025 1,003,690.00 3.900%2/28/2027 39,143.91 First Financial - ECA 11/1/2018 2,803,516.08 3.000%11/15/2027 84,105.48 First Financial - Waterfront Center 3/26/2020 245,000.00 2.490%12/27/2026 6,100.50 Resolution Funding Corporation 6/5/2025 999,192.20 4.455%4/15/2030 44,514.01 FFCB 7/16/2025 1,002,270.00 4.079%3/17/2031 40,882.59 FFCB 7/16/2025 991,752.85 4.120%7/28/2031 40,860.22 SUB TOTAL 12,090,563.68$ 446,903.66$ Average Yield to Maturity 3.696% State Investment Pool (LGIP)63,820,300.51$ 3.876%2,473,674.85$ 63,820,300.51$ TOTAL INVESTMENTS 75,910,864.19$ INVESTMENT ACCOUNTS PERCENTAGE AMOUNT State Investment Pool (LGIP)84.07% 63,820,300.51$ US Treasury Note 1.32% 1,003,690.00 FFCB 2.63% 1,994,022.85 First Financial 4.02% 3,048,516.08 Farmer Mac 5.34% 4,051,481.31 FHLMC 1.31%993,661.24 Resolution Funding Corporation 1.32%999,192.20 TOTAL INVESTMENTS 100.00% 75,910,864.19$ CASH IN BANK US BANK - TREASURY ACCOUNT 4,312,702.87$ NET CASH IN BANK 4,312,702.87$ TOTAL CASH 80,223,567.06$ TREASURER REPORT RECONCILIATION 78,124,003.48$ 811 - Payroll (2,050,530.78)$ Outstanding LGIP Receipts (49,032.80)$ VARIANCE (0.00)$ 2025 CASH, LGIP & INVESTMENT BALANCES December 31, 2025 PORTFOLIO DIVERSIFICATION December 31, 2025 Pre l i m i n a r y Item 7.1 Packet pg. 13/223 8 GENERAL FUND DEPARTMENT EXPENSE SUMMARY Title 2025 Amended Budget 12/31/2024 Expenditures 12/31/2025 Expenditures Amount Remaining % Spent CITY COUNCIL 448,104$ 467,833$ 441,363$ 6,741$ 98% OFFICE OF MAYOR 452,198 442,728 450,442 1,756 100% HUMAN RESOURCES 886,622 1,147,810 978,564 (91,942) 110% MUNICIPAL COURT 2,076,042 1,746,747 1,981,550 94,492 95% ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES 2,231,509 2,706,702 2,276,976 (45,467) 102% CITY ATTORNEY 1,233,810 1,132,445 1,192,234 41,576 97% NON-DEPARTMENTAL 16,054,062 9,272,172 14,782,604 1,271,458 92% POLICE SERVICES 18,149,551 17,474,102 17,463,842 685,709 96% SATELLITE OFFICE 20,208 146,436 8,861 11,347 44% COMMUNITY SERVICES/ECONOMIC DEV.983,241 1,112,965 912,917 70,324 93% PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT 3,573,400 3,870,655 3,088,356 485,044 86% HUMAN SERVICES PROGRAM 170,358 211,149 159,590 10,768 94% PARKS & RECREATION 5,108,414 5,826,858 4,791,888 316,526 94% PUBLIC WORKS 4,559,072 3,894,929 3,955,686 603,386 87% FACILITIES MAINTENANCE 2,315,424 2,638,564 2,309,459 5,965 100% 58,262,015$ 52,092,095$ 54,794,334$ 3,467,681$ 94% EXPENDITURES - GENERAL FUND - BY DEPARTMENT IN SUMMARY Pre l i m i n a r y Item 7.1 Packet pg. 14/223 9 GENERAL FUND SUMMARY General Fund - 2025 Revenue Summary Cumulative Monthly Monthly YTD Variance Budget Trend Budget Trend Actuals Actuals % January 2,874,348$ 2,874,348$ 8,440,886$ 8,440,886$ 193.66% February 6,664,875 3,790,527 4,084,345 12,525,231 87.93% March 10,950,752 4,285,877 4,030,405 16,555,636 51.18% April 21,273,078 10,322,326 8,751,684 25,307,320 18.96% May 26,537,387 5,264,309 4,330,204 29,637,525 11.68% June 29,627,711 3,090,324 3,004,601 32,642,125 10.17% July 33,061,725 3,434,013 2,984,695 35,626,820 7.76% August 36,799,039 3,737,314 3,009,571 38,636,391 4.99% September 40,422,305 3,623,266 3,264,887 41,901,278 3.66% October 50,490,360 10,068,055 8,938,782 50,840,059 0.69% November 55,316,619 4,826,258 3,626,767 54,466,827 -1.54% December 59,166,085 3,849,466 2,816,806 57,283,633 -3.18% 59,166,085$ *General Fund revenues reflect the full $6M interfund loan from the Utilities. General Fund Cumulative Monthly Monthly YTD Variance Budget Trend Budget Trend Actuals Actuals % January 4,973,000$ 4,973,000$ 5,519,627$ 5,519,627$ 10.99% February 9,577,478 4,604,479 4,435,492 9,955,119 3.94% March 13,961,392 4,383,914 5,352,619 15,307,738 9.64% April 18,118,469 4,157,077 4,499,661 19,807,399 9.32% May 22,731,239 4,612,769 4,203,644 24,011,042 5.63% June 27,941,172 5,209,934 4,350,659 28,361,701 1.51% July 32,283,047 4,341,875 4,226,592 32,588,293 0.95% August 37,164,999 4,881,952 4,145,055 36,733,349 -1.16% September 42,090,186 4,925,187 4,250,661 40,984,009 -2.63% October 46,636,695 4,546,509 4,443,234 45,427,243 -2.59% November 52,870,836 6,234,141 4,270,022 49,697,265 -6.00% December 58,262,015 5,391,179 5,097,069 54,794,334 -5.95% 58,262,015$ *The monthly budget trend columns are based on a two year trend. 2025 City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Revenue Summary-General Fund 2025 City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Summary-General Fund *The monthly budget trend column is based on a two year trend. 0 5,000,000 10,000,000 15,000,000 20,000,000 25,000,000 30,000,000 35,000,000 40,000,000 45,000,000 50,000,000 55,000,000 60,000,000 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC General Fund Current Year Budget Prior Year 0 5,000,000 10,000,000 15,000,000 20,000,000 25,000,000 30,000,000 35,000,000 40,000,000 45,000,000 50,000,000 55,000,000 60,000,000 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC General Fund Current Year Budget Prior Year Pre l i m i n a r y Item 7.1 Packet pg. 15/223 10 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES REVENUE SUMMARY Source 2025 Amended Budget 12/31/2024 Revenues 12/31/2025 Revenues Amount Remaining % Received DEV SERV PERMIT SURCHARGE 90,000$ 114,235$ 140,951$ (50,951)$ 157% RIGHT OF WAY FRANCHISE FEE 30,000 326,887 36,231 (6,231) 121% BUILDING PERMITS 40,000 85,506 159,537 (119,537) 399% FIRE PERMIT 5,000 3,100 - 5,000 0% ENG PERMIT - SIDE SEWER 100,000 133,474 24,872 75,128 25% ENG PERMIT - RIGHT OF WAY - - 119,132 (119,132) 0% ENG PERMIT - ENCROACHMENT - - 1,644 (1,644) 0% ENG PERMIT - STREET USE - - 548 (548) 0% STREET AND CURB PERMIT - (330) 293 (293) 0% STREET AND CURB PERMIT W/LEASEHOLD 10,000 8,070 - 10,000 0% ENGINEERING FEES AND CHARGES - - 3,059 (3,059) 0% FIRE CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION FEES 10,000 25,240 43,316 (33,316) 433% ZONING/SUBDIVISION FEE - - 1,205 (1,205) 0% BUILDING PLAN REVIEW AND INSPECTION 1,160,000 1,275,344 1,074,577 85,423 93% BUILDING PEER PLAN REVIEW - - 9,180 (9,180) 0% FIRE PLAN REVIEW 25,000 36,178 42,989 (17,989) 172% PLANNING REVIEW AND INSPECTION 110,000 107,717 88,165 21,835 80% PLANNING PEER PLAN REVIEW - - 17,000 (17,000) 0% S.E.P.A. REVIEW 6,000 9,295 5,502 498 92% ENG PLAN REVIEWS 150,000 242,529 87,405 62,595 58% ENGINEERING PEER PLAN REVIEW - - 164,612 (164,612) 0% ENG INSPECTIONS - - 181,855 (181,855) 0% CRITICAL AREA STUDY 17,000 18,081 17,385 (385) 102% 1,753,000$ 2,385,325$ 2,219,457$ (466,457)$ 127% CITY OF EDMONDS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES REVENUES SUMMARY Pre l i m i n a r y Item 7.1 Packet pg. 16/223 11 MAJOR REVENUE SUMMARY Property Tax 2024 total property tax collections were 4.17 % higher than 2023 total collections. This is a sign of multiple indicators such as assessed valuation and possibly new construction along with the 1% allowable on property tax increases. Through December 2025, we are 2.7% up from where property tax collections were during this point in 2024. The timing of recording property tax revenues changed in 2023 to be recorded in the month that they were for versus the month that the payment was received. This is the reason for the difference between the years 2021-2022, and 2023-2025. $14,803,319 $14,843,585 $14,908,807 $15,531,222 $15,956,572 - 2,000,000.00 4,000,000.00 6,000,000.00 8,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 12,000,000.00 14,000,000.00 16,000,000.00 18,000,000.00 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Property Tax Revenues (January through December) Sales Tax In the next chart, sales tax is down -.05% from this point in time in 2024. This is down from last year when it grew at a rate of .99% at this point. $8,406,296 $8,452,715 $8,317,046 $10,302,518 $11,257,927 $11,614,826 $11,729,781 $11,724,263 - 1,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 4,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 6,000,000.00 7,000,000.00 8,000,000.00 9,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 11,000,000.00 12,000,000.00 13,000,000.00 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 YTD 2025 Sales Tax Revenues (January through December) Pre l i m i n a r y Item 7.1 Packet pg. 17/223 12 MAJOR REVENUE SUMMARY Charges for Services $5,934,990 $6,402,115 $7,900,871 $7,968,872 $7,864,954 - 1,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 4,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 6,000,000.00 7,000,000.00 8,000,000.00 9,000,000.00 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Charges for Services Revenues (January through December) Water Utility Tax $929,859 $930,784 $986,657 $1,043,889 $1,155,144 - 200,000.00 400,000.00 600,000.00 800,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,200,000.00 1,400,000.00 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Water Utility Tax Revenues (January through December) Pre l i m i n a r y Item 7.1 Packet pg. 18/223 13 MAJOR REVENUE SUMMARY Sewer Utility Tax $908,165 $966,734 $1,016,403 $1,128,364 $1,241,631 - 200,000 400,000 600,000 800,000 1,000,000 1,200,000 1,400,000 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Sewer Utility Tax Revenues (January through December) Real Estate Excise Tax Real Estate Excise Taxes (REET) are collected from all real estate transactions. The utilization of this revenue is restricted to capital projects and projects identified in the capital facilities plan. Real Estate Excise Tax is up 13.10% from this point in time last year. $5,243,724 $3,897,754 $2,712,025 $3,476,565 $3,931,891 - 1,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 4,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 6,000,000.00 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Real Estate Excise Taxes (January through December) Pre l i m i n a r y Item 7.1 Packet pg. 19/223 14 ALL REVENUE SUMMARY Fund No.Title 2025 Amended Budget 12/31/2024 Revenues 12/31/2025 Revenues Amount Remaining % Received 001 GENERAL FUND 59,166,085$ 50,064,069$ 57,283,633$ 1,882,452$ 97% 009 LEOFF-MEDICAL INS. RESERVE 275,000 180,000 305,000 (30,000) 111% 016 BUILDING MAINTENANCE FUND 100,340 115,724 78,752 21,588 78% 017 MARSH RESTORATION & PRESERVATION FUND - 20,300 - - 0% 019 EDMONDS OPIOID RESPONSE FUND 50,000 382,437 77,004 (27,004) 154% 104 DRUG ENFORCEMENT FUND 4,790 6,445 2,812 1,978 59% 111 STREET FUND 2,440,000 2,415,299 2,428,429 11,571 100% 112 COMBINED STREET CONST/IMPROVE 3,125,918 3,894,543 2,786,325 339,593 89% 117 MUNICIPAL ARTS ACQUIS. FUND 426,821 117,397 174,683 252,138 41% 120 HOTEL/MOTEL TAX REVENUE FUND 129,500 142,047 141,307 (11,807) 109% 121 EMPLOYEE PARKING PERMIT FUND 55,340 35,003 12,576 42,764 23% 122 YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP FUND 2,410 3,057 1,786 624 74% 123 TOURISM PROMOTIONAL FUND/ARTS 49,230 54,589 53,003 (3,773) 108% 125 REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 2 1,648,620 1,922,769 2,141,175 (492,555) 130% 126 REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 1 1,780,420 2,077,462 2,265,751 (485,331) 127% 127 GIFTS CATALOG FUND 345,580 429,592 2,146,978 (1,801,398) 621% 130 CEMETERY MAINTENANCE/IMPROVEMT 473,157 200,519 535,906 (62,749) 113% 137 CEMETERY MAINTENANCE TRUST FD 86,837 114,099 87,829 (992) 101% 138 SISTER CITY COMMISSION 11,310 3,838 6,071 5,239 54% 140 BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 79,209 90,426 76,390 2,819 96% 141 AFFORDABLE AND SUPPORTIVE HOUSING FUND 65,000 71,788 70,082 (5,082) 108% 142 EDMONDS RESCUE PLAN FUND - 6,932,216 9,167 (9,167) 0% 143 TREE FUND 83,502 114,351 312,125 (228,623) 374% 231 2012 LT GO DEBT SERVICE FUND 305,870 311,103 306,203 (333) 100% 332 PARKS CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION FUND 348,622 877,101 151,499 197,123 43% 411 COMBINED UTILITY OPERATION - - 141,155 (141,155) 0% 421 WATER UTILITY FUND 11,863,672 26,281,585 13,619,670 (1,755,998) 115% 422 STORM UTILITY FUND 9,273,514 11,588,718 8,737,227 536,287 94% 423 SEWER/WWTP UTILITY FUND 19,329,568 25,068,006 19,534,848 (205,280) 101% 424 BOND RESERVE FUND 1,174,920 1,463,727 1,149,487 25,433 98% 511 EQUIPMENT RENTAL FUND 2,376,270 2,867,556 2,917,663 (541,393) 123% 512 TECHNOLOGY RENTAL FUND 2,403,582 2,178,804 2,408,754 (5,172) 100% 117,475,087$ 140,024,571$ 119,963,288$ (2,488,201)$ 102% CITY OF EDMONDS REVENUES BY FUND - SUMMARY Pre l i m i n a r y Item 7.1 Packet pg. 20/223 15 ALL EXPENDITURE SUMMARY Fund No.Title 2025 Amended Budget 12/31/2024 Expenditures 12/31/2025 Expenditures Amount Remaining % Spent 001 GENERAL FUND 58,262,015$ 52,092,095$ 54,794,334$ 3,467,681$ 94% 009 LEOFF-MEDICAL INS. RESERVE 317,500 309,312 337,997 (20,497) 106% 011 RISK MANAGEMENT RESERVE FUND - - - - 0% 014 HISTORIC PRESERVATION GIFT FUND 5,700 4,385 - 5,700 0% 016 BUILDING MAINTENANCE FUND 864,068 1,545,429 254,443 609,625 29% 017 MARSH RESTORATION & PRESERVATION FUND 85,720 12,279 - 85,720 0% 018 EDMONDS HOMELESSNESS RESPONSE FUND 188,100 - 109,335 78,765 58% 019 EDMONDS OPIOID RESPONSE FUND 400,000 - - 400,000 0% 104 DRUG ENFORCEMENT FUND 20,000 - 1,150 18,850 6% 111 STREET FUND 2,640,460 2,300,845 1,974,208 666,252 75% 112 COMBINED STREET CONST/IMPROVE 2,550,897 2,927,481 2,122,618 428,279 83% 117 MUNICIPAL ARTS ACQUIS. FUND 415,915 111,567 226,031 189,884 54% 120 HOTEL/MOTEL TAX REVENUE FUND 194,000 130,888 172,927 21,073 89% 121 EMPLOYEE PARKING PERMIT FUND 31,770 106,001 2,002 29,768 6% 122 YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP FUND 3,000 450 300 2,700 10% 123 TOURISM PROMOTIONAL FUND/ARTS 37,500 43,589 29,555 7,945 79% 125 REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 2 1,796,580 1,501,079 900,751 895,829 50% 126 REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 1 2,640,030 1,468,343 1,655,205 984,825 63% 127 GIFTS CATALOG FUND 638,936 578,038 421,957 216,979 66% 130 CEMETERY MAINTENANCE/IMPROVEMT 329,009 266,938 282,282 46,727 86% 137 CEMETERY MAINTENANCE TRUST FUND 286,124 73,000 272,174 13,950 95% 138 SISTER CITY COMMISSION 7,400 4,822 - 7,400 0% 140 BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 87,445 94,071 84,393 3,052 97% 142 EDMONDS RESCUE PLAN FUND - 6,968,315 - - 0% 143 TREE FUND 75,000 201,588 67,642 7,358 90% 231 2012 LT GO DEBT SERVICE FUND 306,220 310,753 306,203 18 100% 332 PARKS CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION FUND 110,035 777,716 28,279 81,756 26% 421 WATER UTILITY FUND 22,570,646 16,592,771 17,349,876 5,220,770 77% 422 STORM UTILITY FUND 12,599,392 7,709,558 9,584,044 3,015,348 76% 423 SEWER/WWTP UTILITY FUND 20,131,741 24,905,590 16,254,468 3,877,273 81% 424 BOND RESERVE FUND 1,149,400 2,286,591 1,149,369 31 100% 511 EQUIPMENT RENTAL FUND 2,139,606 2,758,380 1,961,576 178,030 92% 512 TECHNOLOGY RENTAL FUND 2,228,072 1,677,475 1,932,533 295,539 87% 133,112,281$ 127,759,347$ 112,275,652$ 20,836,629$ 84% CITY OF EDMONDS EXPENDITURES BY FUND - SUMMARY Pre l i m i n a r y Item 7.1 Packet pg. 21/223 16 SALARIES AND BENEFITS SUMMARY Below is a comparison of the total staff labor related costs (salaries and benefits) for 2019 through 2025. $29,701,575 $30,715,471 $31,014,133 $33,596,411 $40,926,028 $43,272,476 $39,910,816 - 5,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 20,000,000.00 25,000,000.00 30,000,000.00 35,000,000.00 40,000,000.00 45,000,000.00 50,000,000.00 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 YTD 2025 Salaries & Benefits (January through December) Department 2025 Approved and Funded 2025 Budget (after Mayor's additional cuts) 2025 Active (as of 12/8/25) 2025 Vacant but funded (as of 12/8/25) City Council 8.00 8.00 8.00 - Mayor 5.00 6.00 5.00 1.00 Human Resources 3.95 3.95 3.95 - Court 11.67 11.67 11.67 - Administrative Services 11.00 10.00 10.00 - Information Services 6.00 5.00 5.00 - Police 69.75 61.75 59.75 2.00 Community Services & Economic Development 4.25 3.25 3.00 0.25 Planning & Development 18.50 17.40 14.40 3.00 Parks, Recreation and Human Services 30.32 30.32 29.32 1.00 Public Works Admin/Facilities 14.60 13.63 10.63 3.00 Engineering 18.50 18.50 15.50 3.00 Streets/Storm 18.33 18.33 14.33 4.00 Water/Sewer/Treatment Plant 41.07 41.07 32.07 9.00 Equipment Rental 4.00 4.00 4.00 - Total City Employee Count 264.94 252.87 226.62 26.25 The above chart only reflects approved and funded "regular" positions. Unfunded "Regular" Positions Unfunded "Irregular" Positions Human Resources 0.68 - Court 1.00 - Administrative Services 3.00 - Information Services 1.00 0.25 Police 24.00 - Community Services & Economic Development 1.50 - Planning & Development 2.60 - Parks, Recreation and Human Services 8.94 2.87 Public Works Admin/Facilities 1.97 - Engineering - 1.00 44.69 4.12 Pre l i m i n a r y Item 7.1 Packet pg. 22/223 17 Page 1 of 3 Title 2025 Amended Budget 12/31/2024 Expenditures 12/31/2025 Expenditures Amount Remaining % Spent CITY COUNCIL SALARIES AND WAGES 251,769$ 252,491$ 227,876$ 23,893$ 91% OVERTIME - - - - 0% BENEFITS 131,722 117,780 155,955 (24,233) 118% 383,491$ 370,271$ 383,830$ (339)$ 100% OFFICE OF MAYOR SALARIES AND WAGES 260,121$ 282,073$ 299,677$ (39,556)$ 115% OVERTIME - 360 - - 0% BENEFITS 72,679 71,186 79,139 (6,460) 109% 332,800$ 353,620$ 378,816$ (46,016)$ 114% HUMAN RESOURCES SALARIES AND WAGES 526,317$ 634,976$ 572,239$ (45,922)$ 109% OVERTIME - - - - 0% BENEFITS 204,951 239,695 199,518 5,433 97% 731,268$ 874,671$ 771,758$ (40,490)$ 106% MUNICIPAL COURT SALARIES AND WAGES 1,338,754$ 1,040,927$ 1,120,255$ 218,499$ 84% OVERTIME 10,000 20,899 21,344 (11,344) 213% BENEFITS 412,631 337,407 350,624 62,007 85% 1,761,385$ 1,399,233$ 1,492,222$ 269,163$ 85% ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES SALARIES AND WAGES 1,450,337$ 1,741,942$ 1,519,127$ (68,790)$ 105% OVERTIME 8,000 12,033 9,891 (1,891) 124% BENEFITS 507,661 495,420 439,910 67,751 87% 1,965,998$ 2,249,395$ 1,968,928$ (2,930)$ 100% NON-DEPARTMENTAL SALARIES AND WAGES 250,000$ -$ -$ 250,000$ 0% OVERTIME - - - - 0% BENEFITS 71,983 62,549 91,333 (19,350) 127% 321,983$ 62,549$ 91,333$ 230,650$ 28% POLICE SERVICES SALARIES AND WAGES 9,414,974$ 10,060,549$ 9,251,735$ 163,239$ 98% OVERTIME 1,030,751 848,568 655,799 374,952 64% HOLIDAY BUYBACK 372,950 192,549 202,653 170,297 54% BENEFITS 3,213,424 3,657,503 3,360,753 (147,329) 105% 14,032,099$ 14,759,170$ 13,470,941$ 561,158$ 96% SATELLITE OFFICE SALARIES AND WAGES (22,365)$ 51,193$ -$ (22,365)$ 0% OVERTIME - 198 - - 0% BENEFITS 22,665 29,346 - 22,665 0% 300$ 80,737$ -$ 300$ 0% COMMUNITY SERVICES/ECON DEV. SALARIES AND WAGES 527,188$ 666,512$ 562,241$ (35,053)$ 107% OVERTIME - 2,066 6,093 (6,093) 0% BENEFITS 175,270 189,866 175,264 6 100% 702,458$ 858,444$ 743,599$ (41,141)$ 106% PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SALARIES AND WAGES 2,056,258$ 2,261,867$ 1,784,011$ 272,247$ 87% OVERTIME - 991 - - 0% BENEFITS 811,435 732,250 672,684 138,751 83% 2,867,693$ 2,995,108$ 2,456,695$ 410,998$ 86% HUMAN SERVICES PROGRAM SALARIES AND WAGES $ 132,413 $ 123,201 $ 125,493 $ 6,920 95% OVERTIME - - - - 0% BENEFITS 36,225 33,886 32,384 3,841 89% $ 168,638 $ 157,087 $ 157,877 $ 10,761 94% CITY OF EDMONDS EXPENDITURES - GENERAL FUND - BY DEPARTMENT IN DETAIL Pre l i m i n a r y Item 7.1 Packet pg. 23/223 18 Page 2 of 3 PARKS & RECREATION SALARIES AND WAGES 2,452,812$ 2,996,487$ 2,415,121$ 37,691$ 98% OVERTIME 10,000 4,959 4,905 5,095 49% BENEFITS 998,001 1,132,078 894,089 103,912 90% 3,460,813$ 4,133,523$ 3,314,116$ 146,697$ 96% PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION SALARIES AND WAGES 518,816$ 376,008$ 372,574$ 146,242$ 72% OVERTIME - - - - 0% BENEFITS 183,992 121,905 138,970 45,022 76% 702,808$ 497,914$ 511,544$ 191,264$ 73% FACILITIES MAINTENANCE SALARIES AND WAGES 870,867$ 1,165,137$ 1,030,521$ (159,654)$ 118% OVERTIME 8,500 3,975 7,609 891 90% BENEFITS 429,657 454,510 394,139 35,518 92% 1,309,024$ 1,623,621$ 1,432,269$ (123,245)$ 109% ENGINEERING SALARIES AND WAGES 2,463,816$ 2,087,341$ 2,062,829$ 400,987$ 84% OVERTIME 2,000 449 6,187 (4,187) 309% BENEFITS 899,319 753,808 710,571 188,748 79% 3,365,135$ 2,841,598$ 2,779,588$ 585,547$ 83% TOTAL GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES 32,105,893$ 33,256,941$ 29,953,515$ 2,152,378$ 93% LEOFF-MEDICAL INS. RESERVE (009) BENEFITS 167,000$ 153,479$ 135,224$ 31,776$ 81% 167,000$ 153,479$ 135,224$ 31,776$ 81% STREET FUND (111) SALARIES AND WAGES 972,443$ 863,873$ 639,103$ 333,340$ 66% OVERTIME 40,500 40,076 32,051 8,449 79% BENEFITS 421,007 364,430 254,437 166,570 60% 1,433,950$ 1,268,379$ 925,590$ 508,360$ 65% MUNICIPAL ARTS ACQUIS. FUND (117) SALARIES AND WAGES 40,000$ 130$ 40,086$ (86)$ 100% BENEFITS - 11 13 (13) 0% 40,000$ 141$ 40,099$ (99)$ 100% EMPLOYEE PARKING PERMIT FUND (121) SALARIES AND WAGES 22,805$ -$ -$ 22,805$ 0% OVERTIME - - - - 0% BENEFITS 7,175 - - 7,175 0% 29,980$ -$ -$ 29,980$ 0% CITY OF EDMONDS EXPENDITURES - NON- GENERAL FUND - BY FUND IN DETAIL CITY OF EDMONDS EXPENDITURES - GENERAL FUND - BY DEPARTMENT IN DETAIL Pre l i m i n a r y Item 7.1 Packet pg. 24/223 19 Page 3 of 3 REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 1 (125) SALARIES AND WAGES -$ -$ 93,166$ (93,166)$ 0% OVERTIME - - - - 0% BENEFITS - - 31,626 (31,626) 0% -$ -$ 124,792$ (124,792)$ 0% GIFTS CATALOG FUND (127) SALARIES AND WAGES 277,502$ 267,339$ 253,106$ 24,396$ 91% OVERTIME - - - - 0% BENEFITS 138,224 122,278 102,714 35,510 74% 415,726$ 389,616$ 355,820$ 59,906$ 86% CEMETERY MAINTENANCE/IMPROVEMENT (130) SALARIES AND WAGES 191,973$ 150,949$ 151,007$ 40,966$ 79% OVERTIME 3,500 1,713 1,839 1,661 53% BENEFITS 71,241 49,835 61,323 9,918 86% 266,714$ 202,496$ 214,168$ 52,546$ 80% PARKS CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION FUND (332) SALARIES AND WAGES 10,000$ -$ -$ 10,000$ 0% 10,000$ -$ -$ 10,000$ 0% WATER FUND (421) SALARIES AND WAGES 1,159,201$ 953,433$ 1,036,419$ 122,782$ 89% OVERTIME 31,500 41,730 40,296 (8,796) 128% BENEFITS 513,903 447,941 450,076 63,827 88% 1,704,604$ 1,443,104$ 1,526,791$ 177,813$ 90% STORM FUND (422) SALARIES AND WAGES 1,035,402$ 885,983$ 956,936$ 78,466$ 92% OVERTIME 28,552 14,738 25,955 2,597 91% BENEFITS 422,674 361,876 449,255 (26,581) 106% 1,486,628$ 1,262,597$ 1,432,147$ 54,481$ 96% SEWER FUND (423) SALARIES AND WAGES 3,225,514$ 2,605,034$ 2,619,221$ 606,293$ 81% OVERTIME 156,250 209,720 279,196 (122,946) 179% BENEFITS 1,212,132 1,029,857 965,590 246,542 80% 4,593,896$ 3,844,611$ 3,864,007$ 729,889$ 84% EQUIPMENT RENTAL FUND (511) SALARIES AND WAGES 445,385$ 447,064$ 452,777$ (7,392)$ 102% OVERTIME 5,000 1,333 75 4,925 1% BENEFITS 157,041 154,687 148,789 8,252 95% 607,426$ 603,085$ 601,641$ 5,785$ 99% TECHNOLOGY RENTAL FUND (512) SALARIES AND WAGES 576,030$ 623,417$ 549,086$ 26,944$ 95% OVERTIME - 662 878 (878) 0% BENEFITS 204,757 223,948 187,058 17,699 91% 780,787$ 848,027$ 737,022$ 43,765$ 94% TOTAL ALL FUND EXPENDITURES 43,642,604 43,272,476 39,910,816 3,731,788 91% CITY OF EDMONDS EXPENDITURES - NON- GENERAL FUND - BY FUND IN DETAIL Pre l i m i n a r y Item 7.1 Packet pg. 25/223 20 DEBT SUMMARY *This 1st table only reflects the total outstanding principal payments (does not include interest). 2024 Outstanding Fund 001 Fund 111 Fund 112 Fund 126 Fund 421 Fund 422 Fund 423 PFD 2012 LTGO 630,000.00 630,000.00 2019 LTGO 2,860,000.00 2,860,000.00 2021 LTGO (A)9,825,000.00 3,560,000.00 1,325,000.00 3,008,999.00 1,437,013.00 493,988.00 2021 LTGO (B)2,345,000.00 2,345,000.00 2015 Revenue Bond 13,570,000.00 4,108,216.00 2,712,971.00 6,748,813.00 2020 Revenue Bond 13,875,000.00 13,875,000.00 2024 Revenue Bond 19,990,000.00 11,755,000.00 2,765,000.00 5,470,000.00 PWTFL 05-691-015 72,295.00 72,295.00 PWTFL 06-692-012 65,763.00 65,763.00 DOE L1400002 327,957.00 327,957.00 Sno Co Loan #03-2016 413,390.00 413,390.00 2016 (2007 Refinance) Chase Bank 679,515.00 117,827.00 9,105.00 53,002.00 6,116.00 223,289.00 270,176.00 64,653,920.00 3,677,827.00 9,105.00 65,763.00 4,868,002.00 18,878,331.00 7,551,663.00 27,258,229.00 2,345,000.00 Total Debt Outstanding 64,653,920$ *This 2nd table reflects both the principal and interest portions of the debt payments. 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2035 2040 2045 2012 LTGO 138,438 131,063 83,663 81,975 80,288 83,600 81,800 - - 2019 LTGO 233,725 236,475 233,725 235,725 232,225 233,475 1,169,656 935,875 - 2021 LTGO (A)1,213,250 1,212,750 1,215,250 1,215,500 1,213,500 1,209,250 2,662,050 1,801,000 357,000 2021 LTGO (B)167,415 170,115 167,715 170,315 167,815 170,315 841,188 845,055 169,290 2015 Revenue Bond 1,149,369 1,148,369 1,148,119 1,147,269 1,149,925 1,145,875 5,741,250 5,739,200 - 2020 Revenue Bond 304,044 304,044 304,044 304,044 304,044 304,044 1,520,219 3,634,019 12,541,456 2024 Revenue Bond 1,389,500 1,395,000 1,389,250 1,392,750 1,390,000 1,391,250 10,885,500 8,815,000 3,406,500 PWTFL 05-691-015 72,657 - - - - - - - - PWTFL 06-692-012 33,210 33,046 - - - - - - - DOE L1400002 40,570 40,570 40,570 40,570 40,570 40,570 121,710 - - Sno Co Loan #03-2016 35,729 35,286 34,843 34,400 33,957 33,514 160,927 91,241 2016 (2007 Refinance) Chase Bank 347,807 348,785 - - - - - - - Total Principal and Interest Debt Outstanding 90,165,091$ Annual Principal and Interest Debt Payments Pre l i m i n a r y Item 7.1 Packet pg. 26/223 21 INTERFUND LOAN SUMMARY Below are details of the Interfund Loans from Funds 421 and 422 to the General Fund in 2025. We have utilized all $6m of the loans. Month Beginning Balance Loan Draws Total Balance Interest Rate (%)Monthly Interest Remaining Balance to borrow 2025-01 - 3,500,000 3,500,000 4.45% 12,981 - 2025-02 3,500,000 3,500,000 4.45% 12,981 - 2025-03 3,500,000 - 3,500,000 4.45% 12,981 - 2025-04 3,500,000 - 3,500,000 4.45% 12,981 - 2025-05 3,500,000 - 3,500,000 4.45% 12,981 - 2025-06 3,500,000 - 3,500,000 4.45% 12,981 - 2025-07 3,500,000 - 3,500,000 4.45% 12,981 - 2025-08 3,500,000 - 3,500,000 4.45% 12,981 - 2025-09 3,500,000 - 3,500,000 4.45% 12,981 - 2025-10 3,500,000 - 3,500,000 4.45% 12,981 - 2025-11 3,500,000 - 3,500,000 4.45% 12,981 - 2025-12 3,500,000 - 3,500,000 4.45% 12,981 - 155,771 Fund 421 Month Beginning Balance Loan Draws Total Balance Interest Rate (%)Monthly Interest Remaining Balance to borrow 2025-01 - 2,253,084 2,253,084 4.45% 8,356 246,916 2025-02 2,253,084 246,916 2,500,000 4.43% 9,267 - 2025-03 2,500,000 - 2,500,000 4.45% 9,267 - 2025-04 2,500,000 2,500,000 4.45% 9,267 - 2025-05 2,500,000 - 2,500,000 4.45% 9,267 - 2025-06 2,500,000 - 2,500,000 4.45% 9,267 - 2025-07 2,500,000 - 2,500,000 4.45% 9,267 - 2025-08 2,500,000 - 2,500,000 4.45% 9,267 - 2025-09 2,500,000 - 2,500,000 4.45% 9,267 - 2025-10 2,500,000 - 2,500,000 4.45% 9,267 - 2025-11 2,500,000 - 2,500,000 4.45% 9,267 - 2025-12 2,500,000 - 2,500,000 4.45% 9,267 - 110,297 Fund 422 Pre l i m i n a r y Item 7.1 Packet pg. 27/223 22 INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO SUMMARY Years Agency/Investment Purchase to Par Market Maturity Coupon Issuer Type Price Maturity Value Value Date Rate Farmer Mac Bonds 1,994,172 0.09 2,000,000 1,999,948 02/02/26 3.950% FHLMC Bonds 993,661 0.56 1,115,000 1,097,425 07/22/26 0.830% Farmer Mac Bonds 2,057,309 0.88 2,305,000 2,252,040 11/17/26 1.150% First Financial - Waterfront Center CD 245,000 0.99 245,000 245,000 12/27/26 2.469% US Treasury Note Note 1,003,690 1.16 1,000,000 1,007,031 02/28/27 4.125% First Financial - ECA CD 2,803,516 1.87 2,803,516 2,803,516 11/15/27 2.956% Resolution Funding Corporation Bonds 999,192 4.29 1,220,000 1,036,290 04/15/30 4.482% FFCB Bonds 1,002,270 5.21 1,000,000 1,015,264 03/17/31 4.125% FFCB Bonds 991,753 5.58 1,165,000 1,018,007 07/28/31 1.310% TOTAL SECURITIES 12,090,564 2.29 12,853,516 12,474,522 Washington State Local Gov't Investment Pool 63,820,301 63,820,301 Demand 3.88% TOTAL PORTFOLIO 76,673,817$ 76,294,822$ As of December 31, 2025 City of Edmonds Investment Portfolio Detail Farmer Mac, 33% First Financial - CD, 24% FFCB, 17% FHLMC, 9% US Treasury Note, 8% Issuer Diversification Checking, $4.31 , 5% State LGIP, $63.82 , 79% CD's, $3.05 , 4% Note, $1.00 , 1% Bonds, $8.81 , 11% Cash and Investment Balances (in $ Millions) Pre l i m i n a r y Item 7.1 Packet pg. 28/223 23 INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO SUMMARY $1,236,875 $947,931 $950,684 $1,091,709 $1,683,872 $3,044,847 $2,914,584 $- $500,000 $1,000,000 $1,500,000 $2,000,000 $2,500,000 $3,000,000 $3,500,000 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 YTD 2025 Annual Interest Income 1,236,875 947,931 950,684 1,091,709 1,683,872 3,044,847 2,914,584 - 500,000 1,000,000 1,500,000 2,000,000 2,500,000 3,000,000 3,500,000 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 YTD 2025 Interest Income (January through December) Pre l i m i n a r y Item 7.1 Packet pg. 29/223 City of Edmonds 2025 General Fund (001) Cash Flow Report (with ACTUALS) Difference Revenues Jan Actual Feb Actual Mar Actual Apr Actual May Actual Jun Actual Jul Actual Aug Actual Sep Actual Oct Actual Nov Actual Dec Actual Total 25 YE Estimate inc / (dec)8,440,886 4,084,345 4,030,405 8,751,684 4,330,204 3,004,601 2,984,695 3,009,571 3,264,887 8,938,782 3,626,767 2,816,806 57,283,633 57,270,547 13,086 - - - - - - - - - - - - - Expenditures Jan Actual Feb Actual Mar Actual Apr Actual May Actual Jun Actual Jul Actual Aug Actual Sep Actual Oct Actual Nov Actual Dec Actual Total 25 YE Estimate Balance5,519,627 4,435,492 5,352,619 4,499,661 4,203,644 4,350,659 4,226,592 4,145,055 4,250,661 4,443,234 4,270,022 5,097,069 54,794,334 55,629,793 (835,459) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Net Revenue/(Expenditures)2,921,259 (351,147) (1,322,214) 4,252,023 126,561 (1,346,059) (1,241,897) (1,135,485) (985,774) 4,495,548 (643,255) (2,280,263) 2,489,299 1,640,754 848,545 Changes in AR 78,894 (26,848) 29,632 (7,574) 155,431 5 9,738 (99,497) 68,355 (23,066) 3 5,249 (29,610) (119,145) 121,559Changes in AP (2 63,145) 45,484 136,501 (91,664) (29,246) 840,624 (8 90,397) 20,868 (7 ,035) (103,831) (29,355) 6,155 (365,042) Changes in Cash/Petty Cash 100 400 7 50 (400) 850 Cash Balance 119,080 (213,432) (1,369,513) 2,783,272 3,036,418 2,590,721 359,681 (686,581) (1,702,456) 2,724,110 2,021,891 (371,362) (371,362) 2 Pre l i m i n a r y Item 7.1 Packet pg. 30/223 Parks # CIP/CFP Code Eden#Division Work Performed for Project Name Project Budget Budget Amendment Total Budget PY Expenses CY Expenses - through 6/30/2025 Expenses to Date ($) Expenses to Date (%) Remaining Budget Grant/Loan PY Reimbursement CY Reimbursement Reimbursement to Date ($) Reimbursement to Date (%) Grant/Loan Remaining 143 Tree Fund 322 Parks Constructi on 322-100 Park Impact 125 REET II 126 REET I 137 Cemetery Trust Projects with Grant Funding P2 & D13 P2 & D13 c618 Parks Parks Mee Property 1,157,500 1,157,500 1,032,265 38,092 1,070,357 92%87,143 853,125 713,953 56,464 770,418 90%82,707 200,000 853,125 20000 84375 84375 D20 D20 c597.re Parks Parks Mathay Ballinger Shade Structure 127,000 127,000 - - - 0%127,000 127,000 - - - 0%127,000 127,000 Projects Active in Eden D20 D20 c597.re Parks Parks Mathay Ballinger Improvements 499,300 499,300 523,152 54,497 577,649 116%(78,349) 102,234 475415 R10 R10 c634.re Parks Parks Signage & Wayfinding 75,000 75,000 47,084 8,414 55,498 74%19,502 75000 P8 P8 c647.st Parks Parks Shell Creek Restoration Phase 1 250,000 250,000 - 6,152 6,152 2%243,848 250000 R19 R10 c647.st Parks Parks Shell Creek Restoration Phase 2 380,000 380,000 - 742 742 0%379,258 380000 D19 D19 NA Parks Parks Lake Ballinger Park Mountlake Terrace ILA 200,000 200,000 - - - 0%200,000 200000 R11 R11 M186.re Parks Parks Citywide Park Improvements & Maintenance 450,000 450,000 - 67,210 67,210 15%382,790 450000 D8 D8 NA Cemetery Cemetery Cemetery Columbarium Expansion - Phase II 175,000 175,000 - - - 0%175,000 175000 3,186,800 127,000 3,313,800 1,602,501 175,107 1,777,608 1,536,192 980,125 713,953 56,464 770,418 209,707 200,000 980,125 102,234 1,850,415 84,375 259,375 From Grant Billing 25 Pre l i m i n a r y Item 7.1 Packet pg. 31/223 Projec t Year Project Name Project Budget CY Expenses - through 12/31/2025 Expenses to Date ($) Expenses to Date (%) Remaining Budget Grant/Loan PY Reimbursemen t CY Reimbursemen t Street Funds 421 Water Funds 422 Storm Funds 423 Sewer Funds REET Funds 2021 Edmonds Marsh Water Quality Improvements Phase1 418,000 34,326 133,467 32%284,533 313,500 50,888 - 104,500 2023 7317 Lake Ballinger Way Floodplain Purchase & Structure Removal940,000 134,571 769,838 82%170,162 500,000 500,000 - 440,000 84th Ave W Traffic Calming Program 15,000 7,198 7,198 48%7,802 15,000 - - - 2024 Perrinville Creek Basin Analysis Update (aka Perrinville FlowReduction StudyUpdate)649,200 113,399 158,641 24%490,559 510,600 5,452 79,303 138,600 2024 Edmonds Marsh Water Quality Improvements Phase2 458,000 41,729 79,315 17%378,685 100,000 57,135 358,000 2024 Edmonds Marsh Estuary Planning Study 204,000 127,085 189,740 93%14,260 135,000 - 82,921 69,000 2024 NPDES Ph II Prmt Cap Grant 2023-25 130,000 23,810 49,332 38%80,668 130,000 1,269 128,731 2025 Annual Street Pres Program (7th Ave N Pedestrian Improvements)- 73,002 73,002 15%411,178 379,600 - 18,339 (379,600) 2025 Annual Street Pres Program (Citywide Lighting Improvements)- 35,403 35,403 5%664,597 700,000 - 5,679 (700,000) 2018 76th Ave W @220th Intersection Improvements 11,000,000 166,293 934,202 8%10,065,798 3,500,000 496,061 95,901 6,818,250 456,750 225,000 2020 Highway 99 Revitalization & Gatewaay Project - Stage 2 9,400,000 14,064 9,104,160 97%315,840 10,090,000 8,768,869 - (690,000) 2022 Hwy 99 Revitalization Project - Stage 3 28,457,000 374,029 1,832,901 6%26,624,099 22,661,000 1,337,820 225,768 5,796,000 2022 Hwy 99 Revitalization Project - Stage 3 - - 729,147 - 191,280 2022 Hwy 99 Revitalization Project - Stage 4 37,000,000 114,832 1,220,940 3%35,779,060 10,886,000 1,083,901 91,306 26,114,000 2022 SR -104 Adaptive System 4,000,000 2,015 252,797 6%3,747,204 354,650 215,479 2,559 3,645,350 2023 Main St Overlay 6th - 8th - WSDOT 1,855,000 1,401,045 1,955,760 71%784,930 800,765 95,478 676,954 465,445 519,843 68,947 2023 Main St Overlay 6th - 8th - TIB - - 449,897 - 449,897 2024 Safety Action Plan 375,000 193,521 194,080 52%180,920 300,000 - 50,711 75,000 2023 Phase 11 Sewer Replacement (2024)2,314,297 151,305 1,563,005 68%751,292 2024 Phase 12 Sewer Replacement (2025)2,700,000 217,511 522,204 19%2,177,796 2025 Phase 13 Sewer Replacement (2026)2,503,000 281,263 281,275 11%2,221,725 2025 2025 PFAS Study for Deer Creek CARA - 6,774 6,774 11%53,226 2022 Lower Perrinville Creek Restoration Project 4,500,000 129,991 343,104 8%4,156,896 2020 Perrinville Creek Flow Management Projects 100,000 46,039 87,634 88%12,366 2022 Phase 4 Storm Maintenance 1,912,400 10,276 1,058,370 55%854,030 2024 Phase 5 Storm Maintenance 2,011,000 79,400 191,298 10%1,819,702 2025 Phase 6 Storm Maintenance 1,318,000 321,155 322,732 24%995,268 2022 Storm and Surface Water Comprehensive Plan Update 733,000 121,905 506,227 69%226,773 2025 2025 Pedestrian Safety Program 20,180 25,957 25,957 129%(5,777) 2025 2025 Traffic Calming Program 80,650 67,314 67,314 83%13,336 2026 Overlay Program 82,600 40,542 40,542 49%42,058 2023 84th Ave W Walkway from 238th St SW to 234th St SW 3,325,000 26,818 80,663 2%3,259,337 2024 88th Ave Overlay and Sidewalk Repair 1,180,000 446,297 502,625 43%677,375 2025 Annual Street Pres Program (2025 Overlay Program)1,801,800 1,227,100 1,260,429 63%741,371 2025 Annual Street Pres Program (2025 Ramps Program)- 34,599 34,599 #DIV/0!(34,599) 2020 Citywide Bicycle Improvements Project 2,800,000 1,971 2,621,719 94%178,281 2021 Elm Way Walkway from 8th Ave S to 9th Ave S 1,000,000 535 857,227 86%142,773 2020 Official Street Map & Sidewalk Plan - - 909 0%(909) 2025 Olympic View Drive Overlay - 196th/SR-524 to Talbot Rd1,500,000 28,742 28,742 2%1,471,258 2024 PW Parking Lot Apron Repair 1,236,000 6,043 40,112 3%1,195,888 2025 Traffic Signal Upgrade 30,280 3,101 3,101 0%27,179 2023 Transportation Plan Update 406,000 22,817 409,667 99%2,219 2024 PW UST Replacement 135,000 1,520 13,083 10%121,917 2023 Phase 14 Annual Replacement Program - Waterline 2,603,000 17,036 2,402,817 92%200,183 2024 Phase 15 Annual Replacement Program - Waterline 4,091,000 3,545,737 4,034,652 99%56,348 2025 Phase 16 Annual Replacement Program - Waterline 3,836,000 399,359 399,372 10%3,436,628 2022 Yost & Seaview Reservoir Repairs & Upgrades 9,659,000 163,485 568,334 6%9,090,666 2025 CH Stairway 50,000 21,332 21,332 43%28,668 2025 Electrical Panel Replacement 25,000 8,663 8,663 35%16,337 2024 FAC Doors 50,000 147,779 154,822 310%(104,822) 2024 Spoil pile cover - 16,672 34,914 47%40,086 2024 Asset Criticality Ranking 150,000 23,823 125,986 84%24,014 2018 Phase 6 Energy Design SSI 27,252,645 1,502,251 28,506,667 105%(1,254,022) Vehicles 490,000 749,045 1,572,204 321%(851,204) #########12,750,480 65,689,849 111,783,959 52,555,159 12,555,217 2,156,484 41,144,445 456,750 1,854,943 - 68,947 From Grant Billing R:\Finance Committee\2025\Copy of 2025 Capital Projects - 12-31-2025 - Final for Council 26 Pre l i m i n a r y Item 7.1 Packet pg. 32/223 27 APPENDIX A Pre l i m i n a r y Item 7.1 Packet pg. 33/223 28 GENERAL FUND DEPARTMENT EXPENSE SUMMARY City Council Cumulative Monthly Monthly YTD Variance Budget Trend Budget Trend Actuals Actuals % January 37,216$ 37,216$ 49,177$ 49,177$ 32.14% February 82,955 45,739 38,781 87,958 6.03% March 119,387 36,432 39,218 127,176 6.52% April 154,573 35,186 39,552 166,728 7.86% May 202,268 47,695 34,219 200,947 -0.65% June 233,509 31,241 31,491 232,438 -0.46% July 272,394 38,885 33,665 266,103 -2.31% August 307,852 35,457 33,941 300,044 -2.54% September 343,186 35,334 33,054 333,098 -2.94% October 376,666 33,480 36,348 369,446 -1.92% November 415,377 38,712 36,896 406,342 -2.18% December 448,104 32,727 35,021 441,363 -1.50% 448,104$ Office of Mayor Cumulative Monthly Monthly YTD Variance Budget Trend Budget Trend Actuals Actuals % January 36,376$ 36,376$ 32,643$ 32,643$ -10.26% February 72,658 36,283 34,603 67,246 -7.45% March 114,165 41,507 40,974 108,220 -5.21% April 151,218 37,052 41,304 149,523 -1.12% May 187,207 35,989 65,267 214,790 14.73% June 222,081 34,874 33,003 247,793 11.58% July 262,439 40,359 33,073 280,866 7.02% August 298,500 36,061 35,053 315,919 5.84% September 335,297 36,796 32,690 348,609 3.97% October 373,927 38,630 34,492 383,101 2.45% November 410,086 36,159 33,104 416,205 1.49% December 452,198 42,112 34,237 450,442 -0.39% 452,198$ *The monthly budget trend columns are based on a two year trend. 2025 City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Summary-City Council 2025 City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Summary-Office of Mayor 0 50,000 100,000 150,000 200,000 250,000 300,000 350,000 400,000 450,000 500,000 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC City Council Current Year Budget Prior Year 0 50,000 100,000 150,000 200,000 250,000 300,000 350,000 400,000 450,000 500,000 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Office of Mayor Current Year Budget Prior Year Pre l i m i n a r y Item 7.1 Packet pg. 34/223 29 GENERAL FUND DEPARTMENT EXPENSE SUMMARY Human Resources Cumulative Monthly Monthly YTD Variance Budget Trend Budget Trend Actuals Actuals % January 91,328$ 91,328$ 96,327$ 96,327$ 5.47% February 162,889 71,561 75,919 172,246 5.74% March 231,043 68,154 70,930 243,175 5.25% April 297,819 66,775 69,523 312,698 5.00% May 365,968 68,150 69,820 382,519 4.52% June 440,478 74,510 76,333 458,852 4.17% July 507,330 66,851 105,254 564,106 11.19% August 572,447 65,117 76,832 640,938 11.96% September 648,948 76,501 69,848 710,786 9.53% October 718,244 69,297 82,419 793,205 10.44% November 795,749 77,505 99,787 892,992 12.22% December 886,622 90,873 85,572 978,564 10.37% 886,622$ Municipal Court Cumulative Monthly Monthly YTD Variance Budget Trend Budget Trend Actuals Actuals % January 160,832$ 160,832$ 138,500$ 138,500$ -13.89% February 326,743 165,910 150,891 289,391 -11.43% March 492,819 166,076 144,547 433,938 -11.95% April 662,091 169,273 140,084 574,022 -13.30% May 841,140 179,049 147,921 721,943 -14.17% June 1,008,409 167,269 151,236 873,179 -13.41% July 1,186,335 177,926 156,904 1,030,083 -13.17% August 1,366,327 179,992 172,010 1,202,093 -12.02% September 1,537,772 171,446 186,091 1,388,184 -9.73% October 1,709,240 171,468 194,803 1,582,986 -7.39% November 1,886,885 177,645 195,828 1,778,815 -5.73% December 2,076,042 189,157 202,736 1,981,550 -4.55% 2,076,042$ *The monthly budget trend columns are based on a two year trend. 2025 City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Summary-Human Resources 2025 City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Summary-Municipal Court 0 100,000 200,000 300,000 400,000 500,000 600,000 700,000 800,000 900,000 1,000,000 1,100,000 1,200,000 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Human Resources Current Year Budget Prior Year 0 200,000 400,000 600,000 800,000 1,000,000 1,200,000 1,400,000 1,600,000 1,800,000 2,000,000 2,200,000 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Municipal Court Current Year Budget Prior Year Pre l i m i n a r y Item 7.1 Packet pg. 35/223 30 GENERAL FUND DEPARTMENT EXPENSE SUMMARY Community Services/Economic Development Cumulative Monthly Monthly YTD Variance Budget Trend Budget Trend Actuals Actuals % January 69,027$ 69,027$ 83,483$ 83,483$ 20.94% February 140,090 71,063 87,516 170,999 22.06% March 211,924 71,834 125,643 296,642 39.98% April 289,698 77,775 80,326 376,968 30.12% May 367,117 77,419 34,612 411,580 12.11% June 457,628 90,511 71,478 483,058 5.56% July 547,261 89,632 66,110 549,168 0.35% August 652,890 105,629 63,350 612,518 -6.18% September 724,080 71,190 69,818 682,336 -5.77% October 807,040 82,960 73,493 755,829 -6.35% November 888,530 81,490 72,198 828,027 -6.81% December 983,241 94,711 84,889 912,917 -7.15% 983,241$ Administrative Services Cumulative Monthly Monthly YTD Variance Budget Trend Budget Trend Actuals Actuals % January 223,512$ 223,512$ 189,389$ 189,389$ -15.27% February 447,899 224,386 205,324 394,713 -11.87% March 626,184 178,285 194,562 589,275 -5.89% April 796,586 170,402 180,949 770,225 -3.31% May 1,033,690 237,104 175,561 945,786 -8.50% June 1,184,093 150,402 175,016 1,120,802 -5.35% July 1,348,821 164,728 170,178 1,290,980 -4.29% August 1,510,848 162,027 173,746 1,464,726 -3.05% September 1,685,828 174,980 184,119 1,648,845 -2.19% October 1,858,239 172,411 244,827 1,893,672 1.91% November 2,057,202 198,963 184,594 2,078,266 1.02% December 2,231,509 174,307 198,710 2,276,976 2.04% 2,231,509$ *The monthly budget trend columns are based on a two year trend. 2025 City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Summary-Community Services/Economic Development 2025 City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Summary-Administrative Services 0 100,000 200,000 300,000 400,000 500,000 600,000 700,000 800,000 900,000 1,000,000 1,100,000 1,200,000 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Community Services/Economic Development Current Year Budget Prior Year 0 200,000 400,000 600,000 800,000 1,000,000 1,200,000 1,400,000 1,600,000 1,800,000 2,000,000 2,200,000 2,400,000 2,600,000 2,800,000 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Administrative Services Current Year Budget Prior Year Pre l i m i n a r y Item 7.1 Packet pg. 36/223 31 GENERAL FUND DEPARTMENT EXPENSE SUMMARY City Attorney Cumulative Monthly Monthly YTD Variance Budget Trend Budget Trend Actuals Actuals % January 102,817$ 102,817$ -$ $ - 0.00% February 205,635 102,817 25,000 25,000 -87.84% March 308,452 102,817 148,448 173,448 -43.77% April 411,270 102,817 83,667 257,114 -37.48% May 514,087 102,817 92,231 349,345 -32.05% June 616,905 102,817 113,050 462,395 -25.05% July 719,722 102,817 115,377 577,772 -19.72% August 822,540 102,817 110,468 688,240 -16.33% September 925,357 102,817 89,521 777,762 -15.95% October 1,028,175 102,817 98,417 876,178 -14.78% November 1,130,992 102,817 102,047 978,225 -13.51% December 1,233,810 102,817 214,009 1,192,234 -3.37% 1,233,810$ Police Cumulative Monthly Monthly YTD Variance Budget Trend Budget Trend Actuals Actuals % January 1,314,212$ 1,314,212$ 1,442,398$ 1,442,398$ 9.75% February 2,651,879 1,337,667 1,458,231 2,900,629 9.38% March 3,937,828 1,285,948 1,770,940 4,671,569 18.63% April 5,391,652 1,453,825 1,357,930 6,029,499 11.83% May 7,080,372 1,688,719 1,331,151 7,360,650 3.96% June 8,558,989 1,478,618 1,503,724 8,864,374 3.57% July 10,100,816 1,541,827 1,366,126 10,230,500 1.28% August 11,577,577 1,476,761 1,278,350 11,508,849 -0.59% September 13,108,222 1,530,644 1,386,241 12,895,090 -1.63% October 14,647,517 1,539,295 1,546,101 14,441,191 -1.41% November 16,478,767 1,831,250 1,463,373 15,904,564 -3.48% December 18,149,551 1,670,784 1,559,279 17,463,842 -3.78% 18,149,551$ *The monthly budget trend columns are based on a two year trend. 2025 City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Summary-City Attorney 2025 City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Summary-Police 0 100,000 200,000 300,000 400,000 500,000 600,000 700,000 800,000 900,000 1,000,000 1,100,000 1,200,000 1,300,000 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC City Attorney Current Year Budget Prior Year 0 2,000,000 4,000,000 6,000,000 8,000,000 10,000,000 12,000,000 14,000,000 16,000,000 18,000,000 20,000,000 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Police Current Year Budget Prior Year Pre l i m i n a r y Item 7.1 Packet pg. 37/223 32 GENERAL FUND DEPARTMENT EXPENSE SUMMARY Planning & Development Cumulative Monthly Monthly YTD Variance Budget Trend Budget Trend Actuals Actuals % January 250,730$ 250,730$ 254,177$ 254,177$ 1.37% February 510,532 259,802 318,163 572,340 12.11% March 833,056 322,524 268,327 840,667 0.91% April 1,128,470 295,414 327,195 1,167,862 3.49% May 1,433,330 304,859 259,422 1,427,284 -0.42% June 1,728,336 295,006 257,244 1,684,528 -2.53% July 2,013,481 285,145 227,540 1,912,067 -5.04% August 2,273,771 260,290 216,233 2,128,301 -6.40% September 2,660,074 386,303 235,941 2,364,241 -11.12% October 2,914,283 254,209 221,737 2,585,979 -11.27% November 3,200,517 286,235 243,321 2,829,300 -11.60% December 3,573,400 372,883 259,056 3,088,356 -13.57% 3,573,400$ Parks & Recreation Cumulative Monthly Monthly YTD Variance Budget Trend Budget Trend Actuals Actuals % January 455,143$ 455,143$ 398,820$ 398,820$ -12.37% February 821,756 366,613 389,918 788,738 -4.02% March 1,223,523 401,767 481,907 1,270,644 3.85% April 1,610,018 386,495 347,602 1,618,247 0.51% May 2,020,338 410,320 375,193 1,993,440 -1.33% June 2,403,676 383,338 382,162 2,375,602 -1.17% July 2,881,729 478,053 417,118 2,792,720 -3.09% August 3,360,004 478,275 431,550 3,224,270 -4.04% September 3,818,233 458,228 414,950 3,639,219 -4.69% October 4,298,855 480,623 364,874 4,004,094 -6.86% November 4,708,242 409,386 381,830 4,385,924 -6.85% December 5,108,414 400,172 405,964 4,791,888 -6.20% 5,108,414$ *The monthly budget trend columns are based on a two year trend. 2025 City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Summary-Planning & Development 2025 City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Summary-Parks & Recreation 0 500,000 1,000,000 1,500,000 2,000,000 2,500,000 3,000,000 3,500,000 4,000,000 4,500,000 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Planning & Development Current Year Budget Prior Year 0 500,000 1,000,000 1,500,000 2,000,000 2,500,000 3,000,000 3,500,000 4,000,000 4,500,000 5,000,000 5,500,000 6,000,000 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Parks & Recreation Current Year Budget Prior Year Pre l i m i n a r y Item 7.1 Packet pg. 38/223 33 GENERAL FUND DEPARTMENT EXPENSE SUMMARY Facilities Maintenance Cumulative Monthly Monthly YTD Variance Budget Trend Budget Trend Actuals Actuals % January 220,084$ 220,084$ 183,854$ 183,854$ -16.46% February 509,963 289,879 208,308 392,161 -23.10% March 703,332 193,369 233,904 626,065 -10.99% April 853,466 150,134 257,846 883,911 3.57% May 1,044,650 191,184 173,159 1,057,070 1.19% June 1,354,598 309,948 116,967 1,174,037 -13.33% July 1,508,356 153,759 171,286 1,345,324 -10.81% August 1,481,751 (26,606) 216,501 1,561,825 5.40% September 1,632,198 150,448 224,742 1,786,566 9.46% October 1,848,696 216,497 177,262 1,963,828 6.23% November 2,066,827 218,132 163,636 2,127,464 2.93% December 2,315,424 248,597 181,995 2,309,459 -0.26% 2,315,424$ Engineering Cumulative Monthly Monthly YTD Variance Budget Trend Budget Trend Actuals Actuals % January 306,461$ 306,461$ 266,631$ 266,631$ -13.00% February 619,822 313,361 254,809 521,440 -15.87% March 918,206 298,384 251,141 772,581 -15.86% April 1,221,752 303,546 254,678 1,027,259 -15.92% May 1,524,227 302,475 254,621 1,281,879 -15.90% June 1,838,427 314,201 328,350 1,610,229 -12.41% July 2,137,057 298,629 225,915 1,836,144 -14.08% August 2,443,023 305,966 262,298 2,098,442 -14.10% September 2,759,027 316,005 270,038 2,368,480 -14.16% October 3,056,756 297,728 253,694 2,622,174 -14.22% November 3,353,621 296,865 256,748 2,878,922 -14.15% December 3,659,350 305,729 275,504 3,154,426 -13.80% 3,659,350$ *The monthly budget trend columns are based on a two year trend. 2025 City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Summary-Facilities Maintenance 2025 City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Summary-Engineering 0 300,000 600,000 900,000 1,200,000 1,500,000 1,800,000 2,100,000 2,400,000 2,700,000 3,000,000 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Facilities Maintenance Current Year Budget Prior Year 0 500,000 1,000,000 1,500,000 2,000,000 2,500,000 3,000,000 3,500,000 4,000,000 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Engineering Current Year Budget Prior Year Pre l i m i n a r y Item 7.1 Packet pg. 39/223 34 GENERAL FUND DEPARTMENT EXPENSE SUMMARY Non-Departmental Cumulative Monthly Monthly YTD Variance Budget Trend Budget Trend Actuals Actuals % January 1,806,984$ 1,806,984$ 2,308,618$ 2,308,618$ 27.76% February 2,770,589 963,605 1,112,387 3,421,005 23.48% March 3,730,522 959,933 1,507,574 4,928,579 32.11% April 4,404,928 674,406 1,249,941 6,178,520 40.26% May 5,072,609 667,680 1,125,061 7,303,581 43.98% June 6,739,253 1,666,644 988,625 8,292,206 23.04% July 7,426,804 687,551 1,069,215 9,361,422 26.05% August 9,179,813 1,753,008 968,287 10,329,709 12.53% September 10,649,592 1,469,779 984,403 11,314,112 6.24% October 11,858,226 1,208,634 1,043,002 12,357,114 4.21% November 14,314,849 2,456,623 958,601 13,315,716 -6.98% December 16,054,062 1,739,213 1,466,889 14,782,604 -7.92% 16,054,062$ City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Summary-Non-Departmental 2025 0 2,000,000 4,000,000 6,000,000 8,000,000 10,000,000 12,000,000 14,000,000 16,000,000 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Non -Departmental Current Year Budget Prior Year *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. Pre l i m i n a r y Item 7.1 Packet pg. 40/223 35 FUND SUMMARIES Fund 016 - Building Maintenance Fund Cumulative Monthly Monthly YTD Variance Budget Trend Budget Trend Actuals Actuals % January 72,006$ 72,006$ -$ $ - 0.00% February 144,011 72,006 2,637 2,637 -98.17% March 216,017 72,006 879 3,517 -98.37% April 288,023 72,006 - 3,517 -98.78% May 360,028 72,006 3,523 7,040 -98.04% June 432,034 72,006 118,062 125,102 -71.04% July 504,039 72,006 - 125,102 -75.18% August 576,045 72,006 100,054 225,157 -60.91% September 648,051 72,006 7,477 232,634 -64.10% October 720,056 72,006 4,000 236,634 -67.14% November 792,062 72,006 17,809 254,443 -67.88% December 864,068 72,006 - 254,443 -70.55% 864,068$ 2025 City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Summary-Fund 016 - Building Maintenance Fund 0 200,000 400,000 600,000 800,000 1,000,000 1,200,000 1,400,000 1,600,000 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Fund 016 -Building Maintenance Fund Current Year Budget Prior Year *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. Pre l i m i n a r y Item 7.1 Packet pg. 41/223 36 FUND SUMMARIES Real Estate Excise Tax 1 & 2 Cumulative Monthly Monthly YTD Variance Budget Trend Budget Trend Actuals Actuals % January 152,051$ 152,051$ 175,720$ 175,720$ 15.57% February 279,175 127,124 212,277 387,997 38.98% March 520,392 241,217 223,581 611,578 17.52% April 797,162 276,769 284,863 896,441 12.45% May 1,113,349 316,187 346,132 1,242,573 11.61% June 1,372,986 259,637 944,344 2,186,917 59.28% July 1,694,573 321,586 304,745 2,491,662 47.04% August 2,024,381 329,808 274,224 2,765,886 36.63% September 2,331,156 306,775 271,484 3,037,370 30.29% October 2,584,900 253,743 368,408 3,405,777 31.76% November 2,813,916 229,016 218,692 3,624,469 28.81% December 3,000,000 186,084 307,422 3,931,891 31.06% 3,000,000$ Fund 512 - Technology Rental Fund Expenses Cumulative Monthly Monthly YTD Variance Budget Trend Budget Trend Actuals Actuals % January 514,444$ 514,444$ 646,523$ 646,523$ 25.67% February 678,815 164,371 99,448 745,971 9.89% March 837,579 158,763 137,801 883,772 5.52% April 965,933 128,354 107,675 991,447 2.64% May 1,099,264 133,331 127,424 1,118,870 1.78% June 1,216,209 116,944 101,960 1,220,830 0.38% July 1,400,572 184,363 143,417 1,364,247 -2.59% August 1,561,151 160,580 91,769 1,456,016 -6.73% September 1,720,619 159,467 149,056 1,605,073 -6.72% October 1,870,288 149,669 92,599 1,697,672 -9.23% November 2,000,369 130,081 110,582 1,808,254 -9.60% December 2,228,072 227,703 124,280 1,932,533 -13.26% 2,228,072$ *The monthly budget trend columns are based on a two year trend. City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Revenue Summary-Real Estate Excise Tax 1 & 2 2025 City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Summary-Fund 512 - Technology Rental Fund 2025 0 400,000 800,000 1,200,000 1,600,000 2,000,000 2,400,000 2,800,000 3,200,000 3,600,000 4,000,000 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Real Estate Excise Tax 1 & 2 Current Year Budget Prior Year 0 200,000 400,000 600,000 800,000 1,000,000 1,200,000 1,400,000 1,600,000 1,800,000 2,000,000 2,200,000 2,400,000 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Fund 512 -Technology Rental Fund Expenses Current Year Budget Prior Year Pre l i m i n a r y Item 7.1 Packet pg. 42/223 37 FUND 421 – WATER UTILITY FUND SUMMARY Fund 421 - Water Utility Fund Revenues Cumulative Monthly Monthly YTD Variance Budget Trend Budget Trend Actuals Actuals % January 758,575$ 758,575$ 1,172,734$ 1,172,734$ 54.60% February 1,291,324 532,748 772,532 1,945,266 50.64% March 1,992,624 701,300 1,125,661 3,070,927 54.11% April 2,513,184 520,560 818,654 3,889,580 54.77% May 3,251,692 738,508 1,125,777 5,015,358 54.24% June 3,846,350 594,657 929,813 5,945,171 54.57% July 4,777,133 930,784 1,353,244 7,298,415 52.78% August 8,676,299 3,899,166 1,350,858 8,649,273 -0.31% September 9,722,367 1,046,068 1,696,084 10,345,357 6.41% October 10,440,732 718,365 1,129,270 11,474,627 9.90% November 11,235,325 794,593 1,232,262 12,706,889 13.10% December 11,863,672 628,347 912,781 13,619,670 14.80% 11,863,672$ Fund 421 - Water Utility Fund Expenses Cumulative Monthly Monthly YTD Variance Budget Trend Budget Trend Actuals Actuals % January 1,078,856$ 1,078,856$ 4,006,331$ 4,006,331$ 271.35% February 2,214,272 1,135,416 558,760 4,565,091 106.17% March 3,171,456 957,184 676,194 5,241,285 65.26% April 4,154,277 982,820 622,413 5,863,698 41.15% May 5,223,284 1,069,008 502,512 6,366,210 21.88% June 6,707,093 1,483,809 1,443,371 7,809,581 16.44% July 8,779,423 2,072,330 1,343,686 9,153,266 4.26% August 14,112,894 5,333,471 2,362,031 11,515,298 -18.41% September 16,042,219 1,929,325 1,930,157 13,445,454 -16.19% October 17,654,262 1,612,044 1,082,785 14,528,239 -17.71% November 19,044,280 1,390,017 603,569 15,131,809 -20.54% December 22,570,646 3,526,366 2,218,068 17,349,876 -23.13% 22,570,646$ *The monthly budget trend columns are based on a two year trend. 2025 City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Revenue Summary-Fund 421 - Water Utility Fund 2025 City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Summary-Fund 421 - Water Utility Fund *The Revenue increases shown on pages 17-19 are due to the 2024 Revenue Bond Issue which was new money for Water and Stormwater, as well as refunding money for the 2013 bond issue to all three utilities. The expense increase was due to payment sent to escrow to pay off the 2013 bond issuance. 0 2,000,000 4,000,000 6,000,000 8,000,000 10,000,000 12,000,000 14,000,000 16,000,000 18,000,000 20,000,000 22,000,000 24,000,000 26,000,000 28,000,000 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Fund 421 -Water Utility Fund Revenues Current Year Budget Prior Year 0 2,000,000 4,000,000 6,000,000 8,000,000 10,000,000 12,000,000 14,000,000 16,000,000 18,000,000 20,000,000 22,000,000 24,000,000 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Fund 421 -Water Utility Fund Expenses Current Year Budget Prior Year Pre l i m i n a r y Item 7.1 Packet pg. 43/223 38 FUND 422 – STORM UTILITY FUND SUMMARY Fund 422 - Storm Utility Fund Revenues Cumulative Monthly Monthly YTD Variance Budget Trend Budget Trend Actuals Actuals % January 533,460$ 533,460$ 606,261$ 606,261$ 13.65% February 1,879,199 1,345,739 1,405,046 2,011,307 7.03% March 2,426,397 547,198 604,479 2,615,785 7.81% April 2,934,335 507,938 548,286 3,164,072 7.83% May 3,536,482 602,147 723,521 3,887,593 9.93% June 4,029,937 493,454 545,366 4,432,959 10.00% July 4,622,066 592,130 701,734 5,134,692 11.09% August 7,304,917 2,682,851 1,232,245 6,366,938 -12.84% September 7,863,651 558,734 606,606 6,973,544 -11.32% October 8,591,610 727,959 640,493 7,614,037 -11.38% November 9,151,358 559,748 597,517 8,211,554 -10.27% December 9,723,514 572,156 525,674 8,737,227 -10.14% 9,723,514$ Fund 422 - Storm Utility Fund Expenses Cumulative Monthly Monthly YTD Variance Budget Trend Budget Trend Actuals Actuals % January 691,238$ 691,238$ 2,675,783$ 2,675,783$ 287.10% February 2,435,000 1,743,762 629,084 3,304,866 35.72% March 3,144,041 709,040 527,937 3,832,804 21.91% April 3,802,209 658,168 780,275 4,613,078 21.33% May 4,582,451 780,242 439,176 5,052,254 10.25% June 5,221,852 639,401 718,597 5,770,851 10.51% July 5,989,113 767,261 445,471 6,216,322 3.79% August 9,465,458 3,476,345 522,336 6,738,658 -28.81% September 10,189,446 723,988 443,311 7,181,969 -29.52% October 11,132,710 943,264 593,790 7,775,759 -30.15% November 11,858,012 725,302 482,047 8,257,806 -30.36% December 12,599,392 741,380 1,326,238 9,584,044 -23.93% 12,599,392$ *The monthly budget trend columns are based on a two year trend. City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Revenue Summary-Fund 422 - Storm Utility Fund 2025 City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Summary-Fund 422 - Storm Utility Fund 2025 *The Revenue increases shown on pages 17-19 are due to the 2024 Revenue Bond Issue which was new money for Water and Stormwater, as well as refunding money for the 2013 bond issue to all three utilities. The expense increase was due to payment sent to escrow to pay off the 2013 bond issuance. 0 1,000,000 2,000,000 3,000,000 4,000,000 5,000,000 6,000,000 7,000,000 8,000,000 9,000,000 10,000,000 11,000,000 12,000,000 13,000,000 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Fund 422 -Storm Utility Fund Revenues Current Year Budget Prior Year 0 1,000,000 2,000,000 3,000,000 4,000,000 5,000,000 6,000,000 7,000,000 8,000,000 9,000,000 10,000,000 11,000,000 12,000,000 13,000,000 14,000,000 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Fund 422 -Storm Utility Fund Expenses Current Year Budget Prior Year Pre l i m i n a r y Item 7.1 Packet pg. 44/223 39 FUND 423 – SEWER UTILITY FUND SUMMARY Fund 423 - Sewer Utility Fund Revenues Cumulative Monthly Monthly YTD Variance Budget Trend Budget Trend Actuals Actuals % January 1,244,815$ 1,244,815$ 1,580,826$ 1,580,826$ 26.99% February 3,122,070 1,877,255 1,380,067 2,960,893 -5.16% March 4,359,126 1,237,056 1,732,089 4,692,982 7.66% April 6,127,518 1,768,391 1,380,124 6,073,106 -0.89% May 7,846,166 1,718,648 2,895,132 8,968,238 14.30% June 8,996,729 1,150,564 1,095,718 10,063,956 11.86% July 10,315,386 1,318,656 1,834,239 11,898,195 15.34% August 14,125,854 3,810,468 1,327,240 13,225,435 -6.37% September 15,463,512 1,337,658 1,597,716 14,823,151 -4.14% October 16,678,239 1,214,727 1,339,229 16,162,380 -3.09% November 17,971,410 1,293,172 2,054,005 18,216,385 1.36% December 19,329,568 1,358,158 1,318,462 19,534,848 1.06% 19,329,568$ Fund 423 - Sewer Utility Fund Expenses Cumulative Monthly Monthly YTD Variance Budget Trend Budget Trend Actuals Actuals % January 1,358,174$ 1,358,174$ 1,430,170$ 1,430,170$ 5.30% February 2,405,850 1,047,675 905,069 2,335,239 -2.93% March 3,442,156 1,036,306 1,851,346 4,186,585 21.63% April 4,803,671 1,361,515 1,162,242 5,348,827 11.35% May 6,062,161 1,258,490 1,255,105 6,603,932 8.94% June 7,375,677 1,313,516 1,621,258 8,225,190 11.52% July 8,652,748 1,277,071 1,087,379 9,312,569 7.63% August 13,097,255 4,444,507 1,211,152 10,523,721 -19.65% September 14,473,820 1,376,565 1,127,737 11,651,458 -19.50% October 16,027,464 1,553,644 1,049,767 12,701,225 -20.75% November 17,552,761 1,525,297 1,099,765 13,800,990 -21.37% December 20,131,741 2,578,980 2,453,478 16,254,468 -19.26% 20,131,741$ *The monthly budget trend columns are based on a two year trend. City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Revenue Summary-Fund 423 - Sewer Utility Fund 2025 City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Summary-Fund 423 - Sewer Utility Fund 2025 *The Revenue increases shown on pages 17-19 are due to the 2024 Revenue Bond Issue which was new money for Water and Stormwater, as well as refunding money for the 2013 bond issue to all three utilities. The expense increase was due to payment sent to escrow to pay off the 2013 bond issuance. 0 2,000,000 4,000,000 6,000,000 8,000,000 10,000,000 12,000,000 14,000,000 16,000,000 18,000,000 20,000,000 22,000,000 24,000,000 26,000,000 28,000,000 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Fund 423 -Sewer Utility Fund Revenues Current Year Budget Prior Year 0 2,000,000 4,000,000 6,000,000 8,000,000 10,000,000 12,000,000 14,000,000 16,000,000 18,000,000 20,000,000 22,000,000 24,000,000 26,000,000 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Fund 423 -Sewer Utility Fund Expenses Current Year Budget Prior Year Pre l i m i n a r y Item 7.1 Packet pg. 45/223 City Council Agenda Item 7.2 February 24, 2026 - Regular Meeting TITLE:Claim for Damages for filing (First Reading) DEPARTMENT:Finance PRESENTER:NA NEEDED FROM COUNCIL:Informational RECOMMENDATION:Acknowledge receipt of Claims for Damages for filing. BUDGET: Total Dollar Amount:0 ☐ Approved in Budget Fund(s):N/A ☐ Budget Reallocation Required ☒ No Budget Impact PROBLEM/ISSUE STATEMENT: New claims have been received by the city. CONTEXT, ANALYSIS, & ALTERNATIVES: Geico A/S/O Raytchev 550 5th Ave S ($1,132.41) RECOMMENDATION: Acknowledge receipt of Claims for Damages for filing. BUDGET IMPACTS: N/A ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: ATTACHMENTS: Claim for Damages – Geico A/S/O Raytchev Item 7.2 Packet pg. 46/223 Item 7.2 Packet pg. 47/223 Item 7.2 Packet pg. 48/223 City Council Agenda Item 7.3 February 24, 2026 - Regular Meeting TITLE:Outside Boards and Committees Reports (Only One Reading Required) DEPARTMENT:City Council Office PRESENTER:Teresa Simanton NEEDED FROM COUNCIL:Informational RECOMMENDATION:N/A BUDGET: Total Dollar Amount:0 ☐ Approved in Budget Fund(s):N/A ☐ Budget Reallocation Required ☒ No Budget Impact PROBLEM/ISSUE STATEMENT: The Council is asked to review the attached committee reports/minutes from the following organizations: Affordable Housing Alliance Port of Edmonds Seashore Transportation Forum SNOCOM 911 Snohomish County Tomorrow Salmon Recover WRIA 8 Lake Ballinger Forum Community Transit CONTEXT, ANALYSIS, & ALTERNATIVES: Outside Boards and Committee reports will be submitted to the Received for Filing portion of the agenda in the last regular meeting of the month. RECOMMENDATION: N/A BUDGET IMPACTS: None ITEM HISTORY: Agendas and minutes for the outisde boards and committees that have representation from councilmembers. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: ATTACHMENTS: CT Board of Directors Feb 5 CT Board of Directors Jan 7 Item 7.3 Packet pg. 49/223 SCT Tomorrow Jan 28 SNO911 Board Agenda Jan16 Seashore Legislative Agenda Nov 7 Salmon Recovery WRIA 8 Jan 15 Port of Edmonds Minutes Jan 12 Port of Edmonds Minutes Jan 27 PFD Board Mtg Minutes jan 22 AHA December 2025 Item 7.3 Packet pg. 50/223 BOARD OF DIRECTORS’ MEETING AGENDA Snohomish County Public Transportation Benefit Area Corporation Thursday, February 5 3:00 p.m. Community Transit Board Room - 2312 W Casino Road, Everett, WA 98204 Board Meeting Virtual Participation Zoom Webinar: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/87858511746?pwd=UVZwc3doeW41L0pRSFBZbVBVVWlhQT09 Webinar ID: 878 5851 1746 Passcode: 433505 Phone: 1-253-215-8782 Watch Live Livestream: https://bit.ly/CTPublicMtgsYouTube Page 1 of 2 *Advance sign up for verbal public comments is not required but requested to support meeting administration. **Indicates attachment 2312 W Casino Road Everett, WA 98204 (425) 348-7100 www.communitytransit.org 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL 3. PUBLIC COMMENT* a. Verbal Comment: Sign up to speak by completing this Sign Up Form. Requested by 3 p.m. February 4. Written Comment: Email executiveoffice@commtrans.org. Requested by 3 p.m. February 4. 4. CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER’S REPORT 5. COMMITTEE REPORTS a. Executive Committee – Mayor Roberts b. Finance, Performance, & Oversight Committee – Mayor Nehring c. Strategic Alignment & Capital Development Committee – Council Member Merrill 6. CONSENT ITEMS** a. Approve minutes of the January 7, 2026 Board Meeting b. Award RFP #2025-131 PeopleSoft Support and Maintenance c. Award RFP #2026-005 Palo Alto Firewall Replacement d. Award RFP #2026-006 Virtual Desktop Infrastructure (VDI) Host Replacement e. Award RFQ #2025-133 HCVM Paint & Prep Booth Improvement Design f. Approve vouchers dated December 5, 2025 in the amount of $3,443,060.43 g. Approve vouchers dated December 12, 2025 in the amount of $5,453,753.56 h. Approve vouchers dated December 19, 2025 in the amount of $5,241,828.00 i. Approve vouchers dated December 24, 2025 in the amount of $895,501.57 j. Approve vouchers dated December 31, 2025 in the amount of $2,296,057.35 k. Approve December 2025 Payroll: i. Direct Deposits Issued, #500747-502918 in the amount of $6,198,150.28 ii. Paychecks Issued, #113649-113821 in the amount of $433,492.00 iii. Employer Payroll Tax Deposits in the amount of $740,799.89 iv. Employer Deferred Compensation for IAM in the amount of $21,263.58 Item 7.3 Packet pg. 51/223 Page 2 of 2 * Advance sign up for verbal public comments is not required but requested to support meeting administration. **Indicates attachment 2312 W Casino Road Everett, WA 98204 (425) 348-7100 www.communitytransit.org 7. ACTION ITEMS** a. Award RFP #2026-004 Mobile Access Routers (MARs) Replacement – Mike Berman b. Approve Resolution No. 02-26 – Property Purchase – Roland Behee c. Election of Board Officers – Chair Roberts 8. CHAIR’S REPORT a. Selection of Puget Sound Regional Council Member & Alternate – Chair Roberts 9. EXECUTIVE SESSION 10. BOARD COMMUNICATION 11. OTHER BUSINESS 12. ADJOURN Board materials are available at www.communitytransit.org/board-of-directors. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, those requiring accommodation for meetings should notify the executive office at least 24 hours prior to the meeting at 425-348-7100 (TTY Relay 711) or executiveoffice@commtrans.org. Item 7.3 Packet pg. 52/223 BOARD OF DIRECTORS’ MEETING AGENDA Snohomish County Public Transportation Benefit Area Corporation Wednesday, January 7 3:00 p.m. Community Transit Board Room - 2312 W Casino Road, Everett, WA 98204 Board Meeting Virtual Participation Zoom Webinar: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/87858511746?pwd=UVZwc3doeW41L0pRSFBZbVBVVWlhQT09 Webinar ID: 878 5851 1746 Passcode: 433505 Phone: 1-253-215-8782 Watch Live Livestream: https://bit.ly/CTPublicMtgsYouTube Page 1 of 2 *Advance sign up for verbal public comments is not required but requested to support meeting administration. **Indicates attachment 2312 W Casino Road Everett, WA 98204 (425) 348-7100 www.communitytransit.org 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL 3. PUBLIC COMMENT* a. Verbal Comment: Sign up to speak by completing this Sign Up Form. Requested by 3 p.m. January 6. Written Comment: Email executiveoffice@commtrans.org. Requested by 3 p.m. January 6. 4. PRESENTATIONS a. Employee Service Awards – CEO Ilgenfritz b. Youth Art Contest – Erin Cummings 5. CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER’S REPORT 6. COMMITTEE REPORTS a. Executive Committee – Mayor Roberts b. Finance, Performance, & Oversight Committee – Mayor Nehring 7. CONSENT ITEMS** a. Approve minutes of the December 4, 2025 Board Meeting b. Approve vouchers dated November 7, 2025 in the amount of $1,572,700.10 c. Approve vouchers dated November 14, 2025 in the amount of $5,774,804.46 d. Approve vouchers dated November 21, 2025 in the amount of $920,572.24 e. Approve vouchers dated November 26, 2025 in the amount of $1,901,617.17 f. Approve November 2025 Payroll: i. Direct Deposits Issued, #498597-500746 in the amount of $5,761,406.24 ii. Paychecks Issued, #113592-11347 in the amount of $66,993.42 iii. Employer Payroll Tax Deposits in the amount of $652,490.17 iv. Employer Deferred Compensation for IAM in the amount of $13,790.22 Item 7.3 Packet pg. 53/223 Page 2 of 2 * Advance sign up for verbal public comments is not required but requested to support meeting administration. **Indicates attachment 2312 W Casino Road Everett, WA 98204 (425) 348-7100 www.communitytransit.org 8. ACTION ITEMS** a. Resolution No. 01-26, Approving the 2026-2027 Budget Amendment – Sally Stopher 9. CHAIR’S REPORT 10. EXECUTIVE SESSION 11. BOARD COMMUNICATION 12. OTHER BUSINESS a. Election of Interim Board Secretary – Chair Roberts 13. ADJOURN Board materials are available at www.communitytransit.org/board-of-directors. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, those requiring accommodation for meetings should notify the executive office at least 24 hours prior to the meeting at 425-348-7100 (TTY Relay 711) or executiveoffice@commtrans.org. Item 7.3 Packet pg. 54/223 Steering Committee Wednesday, January 28, 2026 4:00 p.m. - 6:00 p.m. Zoom Meeting Link AGENDA Zoom: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/86024833240?pwd=v146gWGGRkrOV1dWI6RkMvdXjZfCYu.1 1. Call to Order, Roll Call, and Opening Items (3 min.) a. Introductions/Roll Call (Co-chair) b. Citizen Comments (Co-chair) 2. Approval of Meeting Minutes (10/22/25) (Co-chair, 2 min.) 3. Update Items (5 min.) a. Summary of PSRC Board Actions and Activities (Ben Bakkenta, 5 min.) 4. Action Items (10 min.) a. Agenda Bill: Citizen Representative to the Community Advisory Board (Co-chair, 5 min.) 1. Introduction, Tonya Stadlman, application b. Agenda Bill: ICC 2024 Regional Project Evaluation Committee (RPEC) Alternate Recommendation for Other Cities/Towns Reps for Snohomish County, Snohomish County Public Works, Engineering Manager (Matt Ojala, 5 min) 1. RPEC Alternate: David Mach, P.E., Lynnwood City Engineer 5. Briefings, Discussion Items (1 hr. 5 min.) a. 2026 Legislative Session Update, Government Affairs Senior Analyst, Executive Office (Annika Vaughn, 10 min.) b. Employment Security (ESD) Labor Market Update, North Sound Labor Economist (Toby Paterson, 25 min.) c. General Assembly Debrief & SCT Exploratory Committee Recommendations (Exploratory Committee Co-Chairs Wahl and Vignal, Ann Larson, 15 min.) d. Community Advisory Board Restructure Recommendation (Co-Chairs Jason Green and Taj Sukhija, 15 mins.) 6. SCT Manager’s Report (Ann Larson, 10 min.) a. Report from SCT Committees 7. Go-Round (time permitting) 8. Next Meeting Date: Item 7.3 Packet pg. 55/223 Wednesday, February 25, 2026, 4:00 p.m. – 6:00 p.m. 9. Adjournment (Co-chair) Steering Committee members please notify Ann Larson if you are unable to attend: Ann.Larson@snoco.org. Item 7.3 Packet pg. 56/223 SNOHOMISH COUNTY 911 BOARD OF DIRECTORS BOARD MEETING AGENDA January 15, 2026 at 8:30 a.m. VIRTUAL MEETING https://us02web.zoom.us/j/84187143466?pwd=z9mY0pGgkcfybQXbQrSDJbCQeUxYTb.1 Webinar ID: 841 8714 3466 Passcode: 425854 or dial +1 253 205 0468 1.Call to Order A.Roll Call B.Announcements i.Employee Recognition – Kim Crannell for 20 years of service. C.Public Comment Policy: Public Comments limited to 3 minutes on discussion items related to agency business. 2.Approval of Agenda 3.Consent Agenda A.Minutes from the December 18, 2025 Regular Board Meeting B.December 2025 Blanket Voucher & Payroll Approval Form: i.Checks 1157-1164; 20973-21105, for a total of $2,340,818.72 ii.Payroll Direct Deposit, in the amount of $1,447,913.04 4.Executive Session (if needed) 5.Old Business (None) 6.New Business A.Finance Committee Guiding Principles B.APF – SNO911 Board Retreat C.APF – Generator Services D.Emergency Declaration Resolution 7.Reports A.Agency Report B.Police TAC (No December meeting) C.Fire TAC (No December meeting) 8.Committee Reports A.Finance Committee B.Personnel Committee C.Public Safety Technology Committee Item 7.3 Packet pg. 57/223 D. County EESCS (E911) Committee E. County ECSF Program Advisory Board 9. Good of the Order 10. Adjourn - The next meeting is scheduled for February 19th, 2026 in person at SNO911. Item 7.3 Packet pg. 58/223 1 SeaShore Transportation Forum November 7, 2025 Honorable Legislators, We are writing you as the membership of the SeaShore Transportation Forum (SeaShore). SeaShore serves as a space to discuss transportation issues affecting north King and south Snohomish Counties and to advocate for transportation improvements to improve mobility, transportation choices, safer streets and roadways, and address climate change. Although most, if not all, of our member jurisdictions each pass a legislative agenda that speaks to the individual needs of their cities, we firmly believe in the value of developing a unified legislative agenda that speaks to the consensus of cities in north King and south Snohomish Counties. In this year’s SeaShore legislative agenda, we chose collectively to urge bold action on safety improvements as it is critical we address this quickly. We also placed an emphasis on equity in transportation investments so that we are addressing the needs of all people. SeaShore also feels strongly that our region needs to address its aging infrastructure and supports new funding sources for both transit and road investment, at both a state and local level. As a region that leads in technology and innovation, we believe our state can be a national leader in making our streets and roads safer, addressing climate change, and developing a transportation system that supports non-motorized transportation options, which helps everyone’s quality of life. We look forward to meeting with you during this year’s legislative session to discuss our priorities and we thank you for your time and consideration in reviewing the 2026 SeaShore Transportation Forum Legislative Agenda. Sincerely, Co-Chair Larry Goldman Lake Forest Park Councilmember lgoldman@cityoflfp.gov Co-Chair Eben Pobee Shoreline Councilmember epobee@shorelinewa.gov On behalf of the four member jurisdictions and other affiliated cities of SeaShore Lake Forest Park, Seattle, Shoreline, King County, Edmonds, Mountlake Terrace, Kenmore, Bothell, and Woodinville Item 7.3 Packet pg. 59/223 2 SEASHORE 2026 LEGISLATIVE PRIORITIES The SeaShore Transportation Forum ("SeaShore") is a body of elected officials and professional staff from jurisdictions in north King and south Snohomish Counties that meets monthly to advise the Puget Sound Regional Council and King County on awards of transportation-related grants, to advocate for transportation needs in our region, and to provide a forum for sharing information and coordinating projects. New Technologies, Modes, and Strategies • Safety Projects – Prioritize funding for safety improvements to reduce deaths and injuries on Washington’s roadways with an emphasis on safety for bicycles, pedestrians, and other non- motorized modes of transport e.g.: o Provide assistance to cities to implement Vision Zero plans Support strategic highway safety goals, including SR-104, SR-522, and SR-99. o Support the reduction of speed limits on state roadways in accordance with National Association of City Transportation Officials (NACTO) guidelines. • Bicycle and Pedestrian Infrastructure and Policies – Using the Complete Streets model, accelerate development of regional and local bicycle and pedestrian corridors, associated infrastructure such as protected bike lanes and walkways, policy, and data collection to provide safe and efficient facilities. o Invest in research and planning to better incorporate e-bikes and e-scooters into active transportation infrastructure. o Prioritize assistance to cities to improve the sidewalk network throughout the state to ensure pedestrian safety. • Technological Advances – Promote and incentivize technologies and infrastructure for non- motorized and electrified transportation and mobility options to support the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions. o Create additional funding for cities to engage disadvantaged communities regarding EV charging and general transportation electrification. Corridors and Infrastructure • We support the Revive I-5 project as necessary to maintain this important highway. However, given the scope and duration of repairs, it is more than a simple maintenance project and requires a mitigation plan including funding support. We’re especially concerned because the FIFA world cup is coming to our region in 2026. • Support present and future investment in planning and maintenance of the entire SR-104 corridor between SR-522 and the ferry terminal in Edmonds. This critical corridor suffers significant deterioration and needs increased investment. • Support full funding for the 175th Street corridor to ensure safety and freight mobility, and to provide multi-modal options that support transit access and reliability. • Provide greater funding for bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure projects in accordance with Complete Streets principles. o Invest in critical pedestrian infrastructure north of 85th Street in Seattle, particularly along Aurora Avenue. o Make improvements to the Interurban Trail, which connects north King County to south Snohomish County, particularly the development of safer and more comfortable passage Item 7.3 Packet pg. 60/223 3 across State Route 104 between Shoreline and Edmonds Funding Mechanisms • Local Revenue Options - Create new local revenue options for cities and counties to pay for local transportation needs. The PSRC Regional Transportation Plan notes $18B of unmet need within cities and $5B within counties across the region. Potential tools could include delivery charges, heavy vehicle surcharges, or revising the current 1% property tax lid. • Transit – We urge the Legislature to maintain and expand funding for local, regional, and high- capacity transit, including alternative services like commute pools, vanpools, and other first mile/last mile innovations. Consider expanded local transit service in all new transportation funding mechanisms. • Road Usage Charge – Institute an equitable road usage charge (RUC) to generate necessary revenue to replace the gas tax, fund the state’s long-term transportation needs, including multimodal connections and introduce revenue flexibility. • Public Works Board – Adequately fund this financing tool to support transportation infrastructure needs. • Provide funding support to address local fish passage barriers. Item 7.3 Packet pg. 61/223 AGENDA Lake Washington/Cedar/Sammamish Watershed WRIA 8 Salmon Recovery Council Thursday, January 15, 2026, 2:00-4:15PM Virtual Meeting Using Microsoft Teams *See bottom of agenda for meeting link and other connection information Meeting Packet Page 1. Welcome and Review Participants Vanessa Kritzer, Chair Councilmember, City of Redmond 2:00-2:10 2. Public Comment Vanessa Kritzer 2:10-2:15 3. Consent Agenda: •Approval of Meeting Notes for November 20, 2025 Vanessa Kritzer 2:15-2:20 4. Updates & Good of the Order Announcements Jason Mulvihill-Kuntz, WRIA 8 Salmon Recovery Manager WRIA 8 partners 2:20-2:30 5. 2025 Partner Satisfaction Survey Results (Information) Review and discuss the results from the 2025 survey and how it can inform the work of the WRIA 8 staff team and Salmon Recovery Council meeting topics and work program. Renee Leichliter, WRIA 8 Administrative Coordinator 2:30-2:45 6. Legislative Priorities Update and Letter to State Legislators (Decision) Hear an update on the 2026 legislative session and consider approval to send a draft letter to state legislators sharing WRIA 8 budget and policy priorities. Jason Mulvihill-Kuntz 2:45-3:05 7. Salmon Returns (Information) Hear an update on the preliminary results of the 2025 salmon return for WRIA 8 populations, including Chinook, sockeye, coho, chum, and Lake Sammamish kokanee. Mary Ramirez, WRIA 8 Technical Coordinator Alison Agness, King County Kokanee Recovery Manager 3:05-3:35 8. Flooding impacts update (Information) Hear about impacts from the recent historic flooding on major WRIA 8 river and stream basins, including how some recent habitat restoration projects performed. Mackenzie Dolstad/Tor Bell, Mountains to Sound Greenway Trust Brent Lackey, Seattle Public Utilities Michael Thai, King County 3:35-4:05 3 10 15 19 1 of 21 Item 7.3 Packet pg. 62/223 Next Meeting: March 19, 2026, 2:00-4:15PM (Virtual meeting) Join the meeting now via Microsoft Teams Meeting ID: 237 515 885 647 90 Passcode: cs3Uh2sW Dial in by phone +1 425-653-6586; 867042586# Phone conference ID: 867 042 586# 9. Success Story: Video Screening – 25 Years of Salmon Recovery 4:05-4:15 10. Adjourn 4:15 2 of 21 Item 7.3 Packet pg. 63/223 WRIA 8 Salmon Recovery Council (SRC) Meeting Notes Zoom Video Conference | November 20, 2025 2:00 pm – 4:15 pm 1 Members Present # Name Affiliation 1) Councilmember (CM) Vanessa Kritzer, Chair City of Redmond 2) CM Carston Curd, Vice Chair City of Bothell 3) CM Michelle Dotsch City of Edmonds 4) Dana Zlateff City of Everett 5) CM Zach Hall City of Issaquah 6) CM Penny Sweet City of Kirkland 7) Deputy Mayor Tracy Furutani City of Lake Forest Park 8) CM Roisin O’Farrell City of Sammamish 9) CM Ted Frantz Town of Hunts Point 10) CM John Brock Town of Woodway 11) John Sherman The Boeing Company 12) Corinne Helmer Cedar River Council 13) Larry Reymann Environmental Science Center 14) Larry Franks Friends of Issaquah Salmon Hatchery (FISH) 15) Noel Gilbrough Mid Sound Fisheries Enhancement Group 16) Tor Bell Mountains to Sound Greenway Trust 17) Bill Derry Pilchuck Audubon Society 18) Dave Kyle Trout Unlimited 19) Cleo Neculae Washington State Department of Ecology 20) Stewart Reinbold Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife Alternates Present 21) Eric LaFrance City of Bellevue 22) Mike Mactutis City of Kent 23) Meiring Borcherds City of Mukilteo 24) CM Ryan McIrvin City of Renton 25) Martha Neuman City of Seattle 26) Carl Scandella City of Yarrow Point 27) Rosa Mendez-Perez King Conservation District 28) Steven Schauer King County Flood Control District 29) Joshua Thompson Snohomish County 30) David Bain Sno-King Watershed Council Other Attendees 31) Janet Geer City of Bothell 32) Allen Quynn City of Issaquah 33) Richard Sawyer City of Kenmore 34) Rachel Konrady City of Kirkland 35) Mark Hofman City of Lake Forest Park 36) Chris Korwel City of Lake Forest Park 37) Patrick Hutchins City of Mountlake Terrace 38) Peter Holte City of Redmond 39) Kristina Lowthian City of Renton 40) Alison Agness King County 41) Judy Blanco King County 42) Joan Lee King County 43) Mackenzie Dolstad Mountains to Sound Greenway Trust 44) Alexei Calambokidis Trout Unlimited 45) Gary Smith Trout Unlimited 3 of 21 Item 7.3 Packet pg. 64/223 WRIA 8 Salmon Recovery Council (SRC) Meeting Notes Zoom Video Conference | November 20, 2025 2:00 pm – 4:15 pm 2 46) Pete Lundberg U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 47) Carrie Byron WRIA 8 Projects and Funding Coordinator 48) Renee Leichliter WRIA 8 Administrative Coordinator 49) Jason Mulvihill-Kuntz WRIA 8 Salmon Recovery Manager 50) Mary Ramirez WRIA 8 Technical Coordinator I.Welcome and Introductions - Councilmember (CM) Kritzer, Chair, called the November 20, 2025 Salmon Recovery Council (SRC) meeting to order. Chair Kritzer welcomed everyone and established quorum by conducting roll call. II.Public Comment: No public comment. III.Consent Agenda: The SRC discussed the September 19, 2025 meeting minutes. No edits were received prior to this meeting. Action: The SRC voted unanimously to approve the September 19, 2025 meeting minutes. IV.Updates & Announcements – Jason Mulvihill-Kuntz, WRIA 8 Salmon Recovery Manager •Jason reminded the Salmon Recovery Council (SRC) that WRIA 8 remains an active partner at the regional level as a watershed member of the Puget Sound Salmon Recovery Council (PS SRC). Recent meetings focused on the approval of proposed PS SRC “commitments” in the Salmon Recovery Plan Addendum’s 2025-27 Implementation Plan. •Jason updated the SRC on the progress of the Interlocal Agreement (ILA) approval and signatures. The ILA was signed by all 28 local government partners at the end of September and was sent out to partners in October. The Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) was signed as well and will be effective January 1, 2026. •Jason provided an update on the 25 Year Salmon Recovery Summit. The event is set for December 10th at the University of Washington Center for Urban Horticulture. This event will celebrate the work of the past and look to the work that can be done in the future. Invitations have been sent out, reach out to Jason if you haven’t received one. •WRIA 8 worked with the Implementation and Technical Committee earlier in 2025 to refresh the Community Engagement Framework (formerly titled “Communications and Outreach Framework”). This refreshed document removes references to outdated work and will provide guidance for sponsors of Outreach and Education projects in the 2026 grant round. It will be published on the website soon. •WRIA 8 hosted two site visits this fall. The first was on the Cedar River to see Seattle Public Utilities’ floodplain restoration at the Royal Arch Reach project site and the second was at the Be’er Sheva Shoreline restoration site along Lake Washington in South Seattle. Both sites featured projects that received WRIA 8 SRFB/PSAR and CWM grant funds. •WRIA 8 is participating in a coalition of partners seeking a legislative funding request to continue WDFW’s predation suppression efforts in 2027. In late October, the coalition sent a letter to Senator Mike Chapman, Chair of the Senate Agriculture and Natural Resources Committee, to request he “champion” this request in the coming legislative session. •Mary Ramirez provided an update on the status of salmon runs in our watershed. Counts at the Locks concluded on October 2nd and the final counts are 18,741 Chinook, 4 of 21 Item 7.3 Packet pg. 65/223 WRIA 8 Salmon Recovery Council (SRC) Meeting Notes Zoom Video Conference | November 20, 2025 2:00 pm – 4:15 pm 3 20,141 sockeye, and 28,150 coho. The Chinook count is just above last year’s total making 2025 the third highest count in the past 20 years. Most returning fish were of hatchery origin and the numbers of salmon predicted by the Ballard Locks counts in recent years have been much higher than the number of fish observed reaching the spawning grounds and hatchery. Preliminary estimates of Chinook on the Cedar spawning grounds are an improvement over last year, and Chinook were seen spawning in the newly restored side channels at the Royal Arch project site. Unfortunately, biologists are still seeing high levels of pre-spawn mortality. Larry Franks added the percent of Chinook and coho arriving at the Issaquah Salmon Hatchery has been declining over the last 30 years. • Salmon SEEson is in full swing! Our Salmon SEEson website features which sites are currently seeing salmon return. As the season winds down make sure to check there for these last opportunities to see salmon this year. • Alison Agness shared spawning season is underway for kokanee. The estimate so far is over 1,000, which is decent considering three years ago only 81 fish returned. Otolith sampling found over half of the returns came from rearing strategies implemented by the Kokanee Work Group. • Chair Kritzer shared the Nisqually Tribe reported sightings of a wild Chinook population they previously thought to have disappeared from the Nisqually watershed. V. 2026 Grant Round preview (Information/Decision) – Carrie Byron, WRIA 8 Projects and Funding Coordinator Carrie presented an overview of the 2026 WRIA 8 grant round and the proposed 2026 Cooperative Watershed Management (CWM) funding guidance. In 2026, the total funding allocation to WRIA 8 will be approximately $6,609,382. Funding from the Salmon Recovery Funding Board (SRFB) is still to be determined but the anticipated amount is $435,234 and is an annual source that is a combination of federal and state dollars. Puget Sound Acquisition and Restoration (PSAR) funds are available even years and is state funding. The anticipated amount for WRIA 8 this year is $ 1,457,555. Eligible activities for these funding sources are habitat restoration, protection/acquisition, and limited funding for monitoring, as well as possible riparian specific funding. The 2026 CWM funding allocation, provided by the King County Flood Control District (KCFCD), is $ 4,521,113 (before returned funds) and eligible activities for this funding are habitat restoration, protection/acquisition, monitoring/assessment, and outreach and education. Proposed 2026 CWM funding percentage allocations are similar to last year, with the addition of one new category of funding for management actions within the Monitoring and Assessment category. Based on the proposed funding guidance, restoration projects and acquisitions receive approximately 75% of funding, including up to 15% for riparian-only projects, monitoring and assessment projects receive approximately 20% of funding, including up to 20% of this for projects that implement priority management actions, and education and outreach proposals receive approximately 5% of funding. Carrie noted that the SRC grants flexibility to the Grant Review Committee to deviate from this guidance if there is a strong justification to do so. The grant round review and funding process will be similar to previous years. Notice of Intent to apply and pre-proposal review will be in January 2026, grant review committees will evaluate 5 of 21 Item 7.3 Packet pg. 66/223 WRIA 8 Salmon Recovery Council (SRC) Meeting Notes Zoom Video Conference | November 20, 2025 2:00 pm – 4:15 pm 4 proposals March-April, before developing funding recommendations for SRC decision at the May meeting. If approved, those recommendations will be forwarded to KCFCD and SRFB for review and approval, likely in summer and fall of 2026. Carrie highlighted one update from previous years which is the proposed Management Actions Category for CWM funds. Mary Ramirez, WRIA 8 Technical Coordinator, explained this would be a new funding category to implement management actions recommended by monitoring in the watershed. It would be one-time funding to demonstrate feasibility, bridge funding sources, or bolster current work to address Chinook survival bottlenecks not addressed in traditional habitat restoration. It is being proposed to allocate up to 20% of CWM monitoring and assessment funding toward management actions. Carrie welcomed SRC members interested in participating in the Grant Review Committee to contact her. Discussion: • CM Frantz asked would WRIA 8 take over funding programs if funding doesn’t come through the state on certain programs with this new management category? How will these projects get decided? For example, funding that WDFW didn’t get to continue predation studies in Lake Washington? Mary clarified that is a great example, it would not be to fund these types of projects long term but to bridge funding sources where appropriate. Carrie clarified the Grant Review Committee will make recommendations on which projects to fund under that subcategory for the SRC’s consideration. Action: The SRC voted unanimously to approve the 2026 Cooperative Watershed Management funding guidance. VI. Project Innovation and Community Grants funding recommendations (Decision) – Carrie Byron, WRIA 8 Projects and Funding Coordinator Carrie gave an overview on the Project Innovation and Community grant program and proposed funding recommendations. This grant round, supported by ILA carryforward funds and PSAR project development grant funds, supports early stages of project development work in key areas of the watershed as well as projects that seek to engage communities in salmon recovery work. This year there was up to $250,000 available to be awarded and nine proposals were received. The review committee is recommending one proposal for full funding and five for partial funding: o Seattle Parks and Recreation Lake Washington Boulevard Shoreline Restoration – Project Development – proposed award: $74,955 (full) o Long Live the Kings – Early-stage planning for an engineered solution to thermal barriers in the ship canal – Project Development – proposed award: $40,000 (partial) o Whale Scout – Development of a conceptual action plan for salmon recovery and community engagement at former Wayne Golf course – Project Development – proposed award: $25,000 (partial) o Seattle Public Utilities – Identifying key drivers of artificial lighting and exploring equitable approaches to lighting mitigation – Community Engagement – proposed award: $40,000 (partial) o ECOSS – Youth for Salmon - Community Engagement – proposed award: $50,000 (partial) 6 of 21 Item 7.3 Packet pg. 67/223 WRIA 8 Salmon Recovery Council (SRC) Meeting Notes Zoom Video Conference | November 20, 2025 2:00 pm – 4:15 pm 5 o Friends of the Issaquah Salmon Hatchery – FISH Reduced Education program – Community Engagement – proposed award: $20,000 (partial) Discussion: CM Frantz asked what happens to partially funded projects? Do they cut back on their plans, or do they not go forward with their plans since they don’t get full funding? Carrie shared she asked all projects that received partial funding recommendations if they would be willing to accept this partial funding amount and create a revised scope of work and budget based off those amounts. Larry Reymann asked where is the fully funded Lake Washington Blvd. Project in relation to the Mapes Creek, Be’er Sheva Park site? Carrie clarified that the Be’er Sheva Park project is a little south of this project. Action: The SRC voted unanimously to approve the Project Innovation and Community Grants program funding recommendations. VII.2026 State Legislative Priorities (Information/Decision) – Jason Mulvihill-Kuntz, WRIA 8 Salmon Recovery Manager and Alexei Calambokidis, Trout Unlimited Jason presented draft 2026 state legislative priorities. State priorities include supporting supplemental funding requests for high priority salmon recovery capital grant programs, a request of $800,000 to support WDFW to continue predatory fish removal in Lake Washington basin to improve juvenile salmon survival and restore funding for critical salmon recovery and outdoor education programs, including Salmon in Schools and Outdoor Learning grants. Policy priorities are focused on improving land use regulations and permitting processes, improving regulatory protections for important salmon habitat, improving integration of salmon and Puget Sound recovery into land use planning and policies and more. The WRIA 8 Legislative Subcommittee will meet periodically during the state legislative session to discuss opportunities to support WRIA 8’s legislative priorities, track emerging policy legislation, and share information. Additionally, WRIA 8 will continue to participate in the predation suppression coalition and plans to attend Salmon Day in Olympia on February 4th. Contact Jason if you are interested in participating in any of these outreach opportunities. Lastly, Jason shared the draft letter to the Governor that is part of the packet. This letter conveys the importance of supporting priorities presented today as the Governor prepares his state budget proposal. Discussion: •Larry Franks requested 6PPD-q be moved up on the legislative priorities and to make it clear it is not asking for new funds. Action: The SRC voted unanimously to approve the 2026 state legislative priorities and associated outreach letter. 7 of 21 Item 7.3 Packet pg. 68/223 WRIA 8 Salmon Recovery Council (SRC) Meeting Notes Zoom Video Conference | November 20, 2025 2:00 pm – 4:15 pm 6 Alexei provided an introduction on 6PPD and how it is linked to coho mortality. UW/WSU research in 2019 linked coho mortality to 6PPD and identified lethal levels detected in stormwater runoff. Concentrations necessary to be lethal are very low, roughly 4 grains of rice, or 0.1 grams, in an Olympic sized swimming pool is considered lethal. Current regulatory efforts are in the works in Washington, California, and the US Environmental Protection Agency but it is unlikely any of these will be able to be implemented in the near term. Chemical manufacturers have announced breakthroughs in 6PPD alternatives, but regulatory standards inhibit progress on these. The proposed bill would ban the sale of 6PPD tires by 2035 and in the short term put a temporary fee on replacement tires that contain 6PPD. These fees would be paid by the tire distributors and could be used to fund program costs and further sampling and analysis. Discussion: •Bill Derry asked if 6PPD-q was removed and not replaced by anything, how toxic would tire run off be? Alexei clarified it’s not a silver bullet and stormwater still needs to be treated and stormwater efforts should continue. The goal is to restrict this chemical specifically. •CM Frantz asked who is sponsoring this legislation? What about new cars sold in the state, how will those tires be regulated? Alexei clarified Trout Unlimited is working directly with legislators to put this bill forward, but sponsors have not been identified yet. The new tires issue is something that’s been talked about a lot and there are a lot of complications with how new cars are moved about the country. They are a different regulatory space than the import and sale of tires directly. There is still work to be done in that space. •CM Brock asked if we know how this effects juvenile fish? Alexei clarified we don’t know, impacts are likely a lot larger than we currently expect. VIII.2025 Partner Satisfaction Survey – Renee Leichliter and Jason Mulvihill-Kuntz, WRIA 8 Staff Renee reminded the SRC of the annual survey by King County, as WRA 8 Service Provider, to help assess partner satisfaction with the WRIA 8 staff and King County services. WRIA 8 Council members took a brief survey to provide feedback to King County on the services provided by the WRIA 8 team during 2025. Survey responses are anonymous and will inform future WRIA 8 meetings and help assess the health of the WRIA 8 salmon recovery partnership. IX.Success Story: Lower Issaquah Creek Restoration (Information) – Mackenzie Dolstad, Mountains to Sound Greenway Trust Mackenzie presented on Mountains to Sound Greenway Trust’s Lower Issaquah Creek Restoration project at Lake Sammamish State Park. Mackenzie shared before and after pictures of various sections of the project site from 2019 to 2025. Between 2018 and 2025 large wood volume increased in Reach 1 by 714%. The project added 572 pieces of large wood to the creek which accounts for 81% of the large wood volume in Reach 1. Reach 1 in Lower Issaquah Creek is now meeting regional standard for streams of similar size for wood volume and is the only stream in WRIA 8 to currently meet this standard and the only WRIA 8 priority stream to meet the 2025 habitat goal to double wood volume from the 2018 baseline. 8 of 21 Item 7.3 Packet pg. 69/223 WRIA 8 Salmon Recovery Council (SRC) Meeting Notes Zoom Video Conference | November 20, 2025 2:00 pm – 4:15 pm 7 This project offers ongoing engagement as a learning opportunity. They have hosted 50+ tours and 500+ attendees so far along with volunteer and education events at the site that will continue for years to come. Discussion: •Bill Derry asked if the potential for additional wood affecting flooding upstream was evaluated? Mackenzie shared the City of Issaquah did request zero rise at the park boundary, so a thorough analysis was completed with FEMA and a lot of the work done within the state park allows the creek to meander more. •Patrick Hutchins asked if volunteers participated in fish exclusion and how was that facilitated? Mackenzie shared that it was coordinated with the contractor and technicians with expertise to supervise smaller groups of volunteers to make sure it was completed using best practices. Next Meeting: Chair Kritzer adjourned the meeting and noted the next SRC meeting is January 15, 2026, from 2:00 p.m. – 4:15 p.m., and will be held virtually. 9 of 21 Item 7.3 Packet pg. 70/223 WRIA 8 Updates and Committee Reports January 15, 2026 •Puget Sound Regional Update – The Puget Sound Salmon Recovery Council (PS SRC) last met in-person at the Nisqually Cultural Cetner on November 20, 2025. The meeting focused on: o Election of 2026-27 PS SRC Chair and Vice Chairs o Briefing on next steps to advance partner commitments in Puget Sound Implementation Plan o Discussion of the work plan for the Accelerating Progress Committee o Review and discussion of 2026 state legislative priorities and planning o Approval of the 2027-29 Puget Sound Acquisition and Restoration Large Capital grant program request for proposals. o Discussion of the Healthy Shorelines initiative and cross-board coordination The PS SRC meets next virtually on January 22, 2026. Ted Frantz, Hunts Point Councilmember, represents the WRIA 8 Salmon Recovery Council on the PS SRC. Jason Mulvihill-Kuntz also attends as a WRIA 8 staff alternate. The South Central Action Area Caucus (Local Integrating Organization (LIO)) has not met since September. Jason Mulvihill-Kuntz attends to represent WRIA 8. •Salmon Recovery Summit: 25 Years of Action recap – This year marks the 25th year of collaborative salmon recovery efforts in WRIA 8 in response to the 1999 listing of Chinook salmon as threatened under the Endangered Species Act. On December 10, nearly 150 salmon recovery partners from WRIA 8, Snoqualmie Watershed, and Green/Duwamish Watershed attended The Salmon Recovery Summit: 25 Years of Action. The Summit reflected on the origins of the regional salmon recovery partnerships, celebrated the incredible habitat protection and restoration to date, and re-energized partners to address future salmon recovery challenges and opportunities. The event followed the signing of the renewed interlocal agreements demonstrating the shared commitment to continue collective watershed-based salmon recovery efforts for another 10 years. •2026 WRIA 8 Grant Round – The 2026 WRIA 8 grant round is officially open! Notices of Intent (NOIs) for both the Cooperative Watershed Management (CWM) and the Salmon Recovery Funding Board (SRFB)/Puget Sound Acquisition and Restoration (PSAR) grant programs are due January 16 via King County’s Foundant platform. Full applications are due in February for SRFB/PSAR and March for CWM, followed by site visits and presentations with all sponsors. More details can be found on the WRIA 8 Funding Opportunities website. Partners and proposal sponsors are encouraged to reach out to Carrie Byron (cbyron@kingcounty.gov) to discuss project ideas or with any questions. 10 of 21 Item 7.3 Packet pg. 71/223 • Lake Washington predation suppression coalition – Reducing predation on juvenile salmon by invasive predatory fish in the Lake Washington basin to improve salmon survival is a WRIA 8 priority. WRIA 8 has supported state funding requests to continue Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife’s work to remove predatory fish from Lake Washington during the past few legislative sessions. For the 2026 legislative session, WRIA 8 is participating in a coalition of partners seeking funding to continue predation suppression efforts in 2027. In late October, the coalition sent a letter to Senator Mike Chapman, chair of the Senate Agriculture and Natural Resources Committee, to request he “champion” this request in the coming legislative session. Although Sen. Chapman is unwilling to introduce a legislative budget proviso to support funding this work in the 2026 legislative session given the state budget deficit challenges and direction to legislators to not introduce new funding requests, he did invite the coalition to make a presentation to the Senate Agriculture and Natural Resources Committee during a work session on January 19. WRIA 8 staff are coordinating with coalition partners to support the presentation. The coalition will continue discussions of funding alternatives to support predation suppression work in 2027. • Salmon Recovery Council membership list updated – The Salmon Recovery Council membership list has been updated for 2026. This is done yearly to ensure all partners have accurate and up to date representation. Please review your organization's representative on the WRIA 8 website and reach out to WRIA 8 staff with any updates or questions. Please provide written notification (letter or email) of new delegate and alternate appointments. • WRIA 8 E-News – The December edition of the WRIA 8 E-news included the following topics and updates: a recap on work completed in 2025, information about the Salmon Summit, Salmon SEEson wrap up, partner project and program updates, media stories related to salmon, and notice of recent funding opportunities. The next edition is scheduled for February. Please submit proposed topics to Renee Leichliter (rleichliter@kingcounty.gov) by February 6th. WRIA 8 Committee Reports Implementation Technical Committee – The Implementation Technical Committee (ITC) January meeting included updates from partners focused on lake shoreline/nearshore habitat restoration. Seattle Parks and Recreation staff shared findings from a Lake Washington habitat restoration opportunities assessment, and King County staff presented an update on Lake Sammamish aquatic weeds management strategies. The next ITC meeting will be in March. 11 of 21 Item 7.3 Packet pg. 72/223 WRIA 8 Salmon Recovery Council Member List 2026 Organization Name Title Membership Beaux Arts Village Vacant Delegate Bellevue Vacant Delegate Eric LaFrance Utilities Planning Manager Alternate Bothell Carston Curd Councilmember Vice Chair, Delegate Vacant Alternate Edmonds Michelle Dotsch Councilmember Delegate Vacant Alternate Everett Dana Zlateff Surface Water Compliance Specialist Delegate Hunts Point Ted Frantz Councilmember Delegate Issaquah Vacant Delegate Kenmore Melanie O'Cain Deputy Mayor Delegate Vacant Alternate Kent Mike Mactutis Environmental Engineering Manager Staff Alternate King County Rod Dembowski Councilmember Delegate Sarah Perry Councilmember Alternate Garrett Holbrook Legislative Aide Staff Alternate Libby Hollingshead Legislative Aide Staff Alternate Kirkland Vacant Delegate Neal Black Councilmember Alternate Lake Forest Park Tracy Furutani Councilmember Delegate Vacant Councilmember Alternate Maple Valley Vacant Delegate Medina Randy Reeves Deputy Mayor Delegate Harini Gokul Councilmember Alternate Mercer Island Lisa Anderl Councilmember Delegate Mill Creek Sean Paddock Councilmember Delegate Melissa Duque Councilmember Alternate Mountlake Terrace William Paige Jr. Councilmember Delegate Mukilteo Joe Marine Mayor Delegate Meiring Borcherds Surface Water Programs Mgr. Alternate Newcastle Sun Burford Councilmember Delegate Redmond Vanessa Kritzer Councilmember Chair, Delegate Renton Valerie O'Halloran Councilmember Delegate Ryan McIrvin Councilmember Alternate Sammamish Roisin O’Farrell Councilmember Delegate Vacant Alternate Seattle Maritza Rivera Councilmember Delegate Joy Hollingsworth Councilmember Alternate Martha Neuman Aquatic Resources Manager Senior Policy Advisor Shoreline Vacant Delegate Laura Mork Deputy Mayor Alternate 12 of 21 Item 7.3 Packet pg. 73/223 Organization Name Title Membership Snohomish County Strom Peterson Councilmember Delegate Joshua Thompson Legislative Aide Staff Alternate Woodinville James Randolph Deputy Mayor Delegate Jared Hill Intergovernmental Affairs Coordinator Staff Alternate Woodway John Brock Councilmember Delegate Vacant Alternate Yarrow Point Carl Scandella Council-appointed resident Delegate 13 of 21 Item 7.3 Packet pg. 74/223 Organization Name Title Membership The Boeing Company John Sherman Senior Environmental Manager (Renton Facility) Delegate Cedar River Council Corinne Helmer Representative Delegate Environmental Science Center Larry Reymann Board Member Delegate Joanna Stodden Executive Director Alternate Friends of the Issaquah Salmon Hatchery (FISH) Larry Franks Vice President, Board of Directors Delegate King Conservation District Vacant Delegate Rosa Mendez-Perez Executive Director Alternate King County Flood Control District Michelle Clark Executive Director Delegate Steven Schauer Deputy Executive Director Alternate Mid Sound Fisheries Enhancement Group Noel Gilbrough Vice President, Board of Directors Delegate Tracy Banaszynski Co-Executive Director Alternate Mountains to Sound Greenway Trust Tor Bell Stewardship Director Delegate National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Fisheries Elizabeth Babcock North Puget Sound Branch Coordinator Delegate Pilchuck Audubon Society Bill Derry President, Board of Directors Delegate Sno-King Watershed Council Eric Adman Board President Delegate David Bain Board Vice President Alternate U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) Shay Perryman Representative Delegate Washington Association of Sewer and Water Districts (WASWD) Dr. Jeffrey Jensen Professor, University of Washington, Bothell Delegate WA State Department of Ecology Cleo Neculae Representative Delegate WA State Department of Fish & Wildlife Stewart Reinbold Southern District Team Supervisor Delegate WA State Department of Natural Resources Emily Haffner Aquatic Land Manager, Salmon Bay & North Lake Union Delegate Vivian Roach Aquatic Land Manager, City of Seattle Leases & Elliot Bay Alternate Trout Unlimited David Kyle Lake Sammamish Kokanee Restoration Project Manager Delegate 14 of 21 Item 7.3 Packet pg. 75/223 1/8/2026 1 WRIA 8 SALMON RECOVERY COUNCIL 2025PARTNER SATISFACTION SURVEY Renee Leichliter (she/her), WRIA 8 Administrative Coordinator SURVEY DEMOGRAPHICS – 41 RESPONSES 27% 35% 3% 25% 5%5% Elected official Jurisdiction staff State/Federal agency staff Non-profit Landowner/Resident Other 39% 19% 10% 32% 0-2 years 3-5 years 6-10 years Over 10 years What is your affiliation with the WRIA 8 Salmon Recovery Council? How long have you been a member or partner of the WRIA 8 Salmon Recovery Council? 1 2 15 of 21 Item 7.3 Packet pg. 76/223 1/8/2026 2 WHAT WRIA 8 COMMITTEES DO YOU PARTICIPATE IN? 53% 19% 14% 10% 4% Salmon Recovery Council Implementation Technical Committee Technical Committee Legislative Subcommittee Grant Review Committee HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS OF THE WRIA 8 TEAM’S WORK PROGRAM? 75% 25% Excellent Good 3 4 16 of 21 Item 7.3 Packet pg. 77/223 1/8/2026 3 WRIA 8 PARTNER INVOLVEMENT THE WRIA 8 COLLABORATIVE PARTNERSHIP MAKES YOUR ORGANIZATION STRONGER, AS OPPOSED TO STRETCHING IT THINNER. 68% 22% 10% Strongly Agree Agree Neutral THE WRIA 8 COLLABORATIVE RESPECTS INDIVIDUAL VOICES AND SUPPORTS TRUST AMONG PARTNERS. 71% 29% Strongly Agree Agree THE CURRENT FREQUENCY* AND FORMAT OF SALMON RECOVERY COUNCIL MEETINGS IS APPROPRIATE? 51% 39% 10% Strongly Agree Agree Neutral *The current frequency sets bimonthly meetings with 1-2 in person meetings in the Spring/Summer and 4-5 virtual meetings in the Fall/Winter 5 6 17 of 21 Item 7.3 Packet pg. 78/223 1/8/2026 4 HOW COULD WRIA 8 BETTER ASSIST YOUR ORGANIZATION IN ADVANCING SALMON RECOVERY EFFORTS? •Garner more grant funding from state and federal sources •Help streamline restoration permitting •Continue providing funding to local jurisdictions for projects •Distribute a guide supporting salmon recovery and habitat restoration for planners •A road show to make presentations to City Councils to share how local efforts are aligned with WRIA 8 goals •More opportunities to discuss collaborative projects with other organizations •Monitoring and reporting on salmon counts •Success stories •Transparency in grants and goal setting •Presentations on WRIA 8’s work to improve water quality and fish habitat in Lake Washington •Support tribes •Share lessons learned •Share scientific data •Share legislative discussions had AREAS OF INTEREST OR SUGGESTED TOPICS FOR FUTURE WRIA 8 SALMON RECOVERY COUNCIL MEETINGS? •Continue providing updates on salmon counts •Innovative city strategies in restoration or watershed health •Stormwater runoff management •Long term project success •Predation in Lake Washington •Ship Canal temperature updates and solutions •Continue the discussion that links stormwater management and salmon conservation •Improving stream beds and water quality •And more! 7 8 18 of 21 Item 7.3 Packet pg. 79/223 The LakeWashington/Cedar/ Sammamish Watershed [DATE] The Honorable [Representative/Senator] [Address] Olympia, WA 98504-0002 RE: Salmon recovery priorities - Lake Washington/Cedar/Sammamish Watershed (WRIA 8) Salmon Recovery Council Dear [Representative/Senator]: Thank you for supporting salmon recovery investments during the 2025-27 legislative session, which provided vital ongoing support for salmon habitat restoration, key policy and management actions, outreach and education, and scientific research to inform efforts addressing issues most critical to salmon survival. Your ongoing leadership is critical to ensuring we can continue our efforts — and Washington State’s commitment — to recover salmon populations listed as threatened under the Endangered Species Act and which are essential to meeting tribal treaty fishing rights. On behalf of the Lake Washington/Cedar/ Sammamish Watershed (WRIA 8) Salmon Recovery Council, we urge you to build on last year’s investments by supporting priority salmon habitat restoration funding programs, science and monitoring, and policies that improve fish passage in streams, support tribal treaty fishing rights, ensure adequate stream flows, protect public access to open space, and make our watersheds and communities resilient to a changing climate. The state’s investment in salmon recovery enables local watershed groups and the Puget Sound region to make significant progress on our highest priority projects. However, our state’s salmon populations continue to decline. To reverse this trend, we need to sustain and build on the state investment in salmon recovery, especially as federal investment has become increasingly uncertain. Local communities remain strongly committed to recovering our iconic salmon populations, and state support leverages substantial local investment and contributions to restoring habitat and improving salmon survival. Habitat restoration projects not only contribute to salmon recovery, but also provide multiple benefits to reduce flood risk to communities and infrastructure by increasing storage and conveyance. During the flood event of December 2025, sponsors of floodplain reconnection projects saw those areas inundated as projected and some reported that neighbors observed lower flood elevations on their property. Investing in these projects contributes to climate and disaster resilience while improving salmon habitat. During the upcoming legislative session, we encourage you to bolster the progress we have made for salmon recovery and climate resilience in Puget Sound and statewide. We ask your support for the following WRIA 8 Salmon Recovery Council’s priorities for the 2026 legislative session: Beaux Arts Village Bellevue Bothell Edmonds Everett Hunts Point Issaquah Kenmore Kent King County Kirkland Lake Forest Park Maple Valley Medina Mercer Island Mill Creek Mountlake Terrace Mukilteo Newcastle Redmond Renton Sammamish Seattle Shoreline Snohomish County Woodinville Woodway Yarrow Point The Boeing Company Cedar River Council Environmental Science Center Friends of the Issaquah Salmon Hatchery Mid-Sound Fisheries Enhancement Group Mountains to Sound Greenway Trust National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Pilchuck Audubon Society Sno-King Watershed Council Trout Unlimited US Army Corps of Engineers Washington Departments: Ecology Fish and Wildlife Natural Resources Washington Association of Sewer and Water Districts 19 of 21 Item 7.3 Packet pg. 80/223 Senator/Representative Page 2 of 3 January 8, 2026 Supplemental Capital and Operating Budget Appropriations: •$800,000 to continue Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife’s removal of predatoryfish species in Lake Washington to support juvenile salmon survival. This funding builds onprior legislative allocations in 2023 and 2024 to continue critical predation suppression efforts that address a key factor limiting salmon survival, support achieving tribal and sport salmon fisheries, and advance recovery of Endangered Species Act listed salmon populations •Direct available revenues to support additional capital investments to fully fund 2025-27 biennium agency requests for priority salmon recovery grant programs, including: o Salmon Recovery Funding Board o Puget Sound Acquisition and RestorationoFloodplains by DesignoEstuary and Salmon Restoration Program o Brian Abbott Fish Barrier Removal Board o Aquatic Lands Enhancement Account •Support restoring funding for critical salmon recovery and outdoor education programs,including: o “Salmon in the Schools” and “Outdoor Learning” in Office of Superintendent of PublicInstructiono“No Child Left Inside” in Washington State Parks. Priority Policy and Legislative Priorities: Climate change and salmon recovery: Address effects of climate change on salmon and salmon habitat, including continuing to guide revenues from the Natural Climate Solutions Account (RCW 70A.65.270) to support investments in existing grant programs supporting salmon habitat protection and restoration and climate resiliency. Regulatory, permitting, and land use planning improvements: •Advance streamlining regulatory review and permitting to support habitat restoration projectimplementation, including establishing the Habitat Recovery Pilot Program to support a coordinated and streamlined permitting process for ecologically beneficial projects. •Increase funding for enforcement of land use regulations. Lack of adequate permit enforcementenables continued unpermitted development and loss of habitat and critical areas. •Improve regulatory protections for important salmon habitat, including riparian areas and lake and marine shorelines. •Improve integration of salmon and Puget Sound recovery into land use planning and policies. Stormwater management and salmon recovery: •Promote and fund stormwater management planning, coordination, and implementation at awatershed scale, address critical data/information needs, and seek innovative solutions to achievemultiple benefits from integrating stormwater management and habitat protection and restoration. o Advance research, policy/product changes, and treatment actions to address impacts of the tire dust chemical 6PPD-quinone on salmon survival. 20 of 21 Item 7.3 Packet pg. 81/223 Senator/Representative Page 3 of 3 January 8, 2026 o Fund implementation of green stormwater infrastructure and stormwater retrofits.Create a new funding source or modify an existing one to support multiple benefitstormwater projects that integrate stormwater management and salmon habitat restoration. Equity and environmental justice, outreach and education, and creative funding approaches: •Align investments in equity and environmental justice with salmon recovery priorities to achieve multiple benefits for salmon populations and communities. •Support outreach, education, and stewardship projects and programs that raise awareness,empower the next generation to continue salmon recovery and climate change mitigation work, and engage private landowners in science-based property management decisions. •Increase investment in salmon recovery and Puget Sound restoration priorities through existingfunding authorities, and support innovative funding approaches, including new watershed-basedand/or regional funding mechanisms and public-private partnerships that engage state agencies and private funding sources to support multiple-benefit projects. The WRIA 8 Salmon Recovery Council appreciates the challenges involved in making state budget decisions and crafting legislation and applauds your leadership. Thank you for your work to continue Washington State’s commitment to salmon and orca recovery, restoring the health of Puget Sound, and working to improve climate resiliency. If you have any questions about how these priorities advance salmon recovery objectives, please contact Jason Mulvihill-Kuntz, WRIA 8 Salmon Recovery Manager, at 206-477-4780 or jason.mulvihill-kuntz@kingcounty.gov. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Carston Curd Vice-Chair, WRIA 8 Salmon Recovery Council Vanessa Kritzer Chair, WRIA 8 Salmon Recovery Councilmember, City of Redmond Councilmember, City of Bothell cc: Megan Duffy, Director, Washington State Recreation and Conservation Office Larry Epstein, Deputy Director, Puget Sound Partnership Casey Sixkiller, Director, Washington Department of Ecology Kelly Susewind, Director, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Dave Upthegrove, Commissioner of Public Lands, Washington Department of Natural Resources Justin Parker, Executive Director, Northwest Indian Fisheries Commission Kenneth Martin, Deputy Policy Director, Office of the Governor Owen Rowe, Natural Resources Senior Policy Advisor, Office of the Governor Matthew Hunter, Senior Budget Advisor, Office of Financial Management Jennifer Masterson, Senior Budget Advisor, Office of Financial Management Lisa Borkowski, Budget Advisor, Office of Financial Management Katie Knight, Budget Advisor Office of Financial Management Shelly Willhoite, Capital Budget Assistant, Office of Financial Management Jeff Breckel, Chair, Washington State Salmon Recovery Funding Board David Troutt, Chair, Puget Sound Salmon Recovery Council Erik Neatherlin, Director, Governor’s Salmon Recovery Office Aundrea McBride, Chair, Washington Salmon Coalition Lake Washington/Cedar/Sammamish Watershed Salmon Recovery Council members Jason Mulvihill-Kuntz, WRIA 8 Salmon Recovery Manager 21 of 21 Item 7.3 Packet pg. 82/223 Commission Meeting Minutes 1-12-26 13 Feb Commission Meeting Minutes 1-12-26 Posted at 10:52h in Commission Notices by Editor 6 Port of Edmonds Commission Meeting – Minutes of Regular Meeting Meeting Date: January 12, 2026 Commissioners Present David Preston, President Janelle Cass, Vice President Selena Killin, Secretary Ross Dimmick Jay Grant Staff Present Brandon Baker, Executive Director Brittany Williams, Director of Economic Development Dennis Halpin, Marina Operations Manager Others Present Emily Guildner, Port Attorney Will Chen, City of Edmonds John Brock, Town of Woodway Lou Billmyer, Port Finance Consultant I. CALL TO ORDER President Preston called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. II. FLAG SALUTE All those in attendance participated in the Pledge of Allegiance to the American Flag. III. MISSION STATEMENT Commissioner Dimmick read the Port of Edmonds’ mission statement: The mission of the Port of Edmonds is to provide value to our community through economic development, marina and commercial operations, waterfront public access, and environmental stewardship. IV. APPROVAL OF AGENDA COMMISSIONER CASS MOVED THAT THE AGENDA BE APPROVED. COMMISSIONER KILLIN SECONDED THE MOTION, WHICH CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. V. PRESENTATIONSeremo Emily Guildner, Port of Edmonds Attorney, delivered a ceremonial swearing-in of Commissioners Janelle Cass, Jay Grant, and Ross Dimmick. Item 7.3 Packet pg. 83/223 VI. PUBLIC COMMENTS (Each comment shall generally be limited to 3 minutes or less and shall be limited to Port business) • Joe Scordino, Edmonds Resident, spoke in favor of the ‘Support for Highway 104 Graffiti Cleanup’ agenda item, noting the community interest in the endeavor. He also thanked the Port for the “health asset” that is the Portwalk, describing its popularity among walkers. VII. CONSENT AGENDA COMMISSIONER CASS MOVED THAT THE CONSENT AGENDA BE APPROVED. COMMISSIONER GRANT SECONDED THE MOTION, WHICH CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. A. Approval of December 8, 2025, Meeting Minutes B. Approval of Payments in the amount of $247,190.73 for December 29, 2025, and $335,668.31 for January 12, 2026 C. Waiver of Notice of Special Meeting VIII. CITY OF EDMONDS AND WOODWAY REPORTS Will Chen, City of Edmonds councilmember, reported that the City has not yet selected the Port liaison for 2026. He noted that public comment and Council action on the proposed Transportation Benefit District Tax are scheduled for the next City Council meeting. He also announced that the City Council retreat is planned for February 6, 2026. John Brock, City of Woodway councilmember, reported that he will remain the Port liaison for 2026. He applauded the City of Edmonds Council for rejecting the use of Underground Injection Control (UIC) for stormwater. IX. POSSIBLE ACTION A. Resolution No. 26-01 Confirming Schedule and Location of Meetings COMMISSIONER KILLIN MOVED THAT THE COMMISSIONERS APPROVE RESOLUTION 26-01 RECONFIRMING THE SCHEDULE AND LOCATION OF THE PORT OF EDMONDS COMMISSION MEETINGS PER THE 2026 COMMISSION MEETING SCHEDULE. COMMISSIONER PRESTON SECONDED THE MOTION, WHICH CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. B. Election of Commission Officers The Commission reviewed the existing process for electing officers. Commissioners examined officer history from the past 20 years to determine whether any consistent succession patterns had been followed. The Commission also discussed whether a minimum tenure, such as one year of service, should be required before a commissioner is eligible to serve in an officer’s role. Commissioners expressed differing views regarding the selection of the Secretary for 2026. After discussion, the Item 7.3 Packet pg. 84/223 Commission proceeded to a vote. No consensus was reached regarding potential changes to the officer election process moving forward. COMMISSIONER PRESTON OPENED NOMINATIONS. COMMISSIONER GRANT NOMINATED COMMISSIONER CASS FOR PORT COMMISSION PRESIDENT. COMMISSIONER PRESTON SECONDED THE MOTION. RECEIVING NO FURTHER NOMINATIONS COMMISSIONER PRESTON CALLED FOR A VOTE WHICH CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. COMMISSIONER PRESTON OPENED NOMINATIONS. COMMISSIONER DIMMICK NOMINATED COMMISSIONER KILLIN FOR PORT COMMISSION VICE PRESIDENT. COMMISSIONER PRESTON SECONDED THE MOTION. RECEIVING NO FURTHER NOMINATIONS COMMISSIONER PRESTON CALLED FOR A VOTE WHICH CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. COMMISSIONER PRESTON OPENED NOMINATIONS. COMMISSIONER KILLIN NOMINATED COMMISSIONER DIMMICK FOR PORT COMMSSION SECRETARY. COMMISSIONER DIMMICK SECONDED THE MOTION. COMMISSIONER PRESTON NOMINATED COMMISSIONER GRANT FOR PORT COMMISSION SECRETARY. COMMISSIONER CASS SECONDED THE MOTION. COMMISSIONER PRESTON CLOSED NOMINIATIONS AND CALLED FOR A VOTE. COMMISSIONER GRANT WAS APPOINTED AS SECRETARY ON A ROLL CALL VOTE, 3–2. C. Adopt 2026 Commission Committee Representatives and Liaison Assignments COMMISSIONER PRESTON MOVED THAT THE COMMISSION APPROVE THE 2026 COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS AS STATED IN THE COMMISSION MEETING, WITH THE ADDITION OF A COMMUNICATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITTEE. COMMISSIONER GRANT SECONDED THE MOTION, WHICH CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. D. Support of Highway 104 Graffiti Cleanup COMMISSIONER GRANT MOVED THAT THE COMMISSION SUPPORT THE HIGHWAY 104 GRAFFITI CLEANUP EFFORT BY OFFERING STORAGE FOR SUPPLIES AND EQUIPMENT ON PORT PROPERTY AND SHARING ABOUT THE CLEANUP ON THE PORT’S SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORMS. COMMISSIONER DIMMICK SECONDED THE MOTION, WHICH CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. X. INFORMATION A. Travel and Conference Schedule Review: 2026 Q1 The Commission and staff reviewed and discussed the proposed Q1 2026 travel and conference schedule and reached consensus to proceed as presented. Item 7.3 Packet pg. 85/223 XI. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR’S REPORT Executive Director Baker discussed the following topics: • State Auditor’s Office 2024 Audit Update • Mid Marina Breakwater Update • Dry Storage Trailer Project • Dry Storage South Launcher Cradle Rebuild • J-Dock Float Repair • Public Launch Cable Replacement • Atrium Windows – Building 4 (Planning and Design) • Second Floor Window Replacement – Building 1 (Planning and Design) • Marina Operations Remodel (Planning and Design) • Marina Projects: Dock Roof and Gutter Cleaning, Marina Entrance Signage, Dock Pressure Washing XII. COMMISSIONER’S COMMENTS AND COMMITTEE REPORTS • Commissioner Dimmick expressed appreciation for the holiday festivities at the Port in December. • Commissioner Killin expressed appreciation to staff for the Port’s holiday events, noting her continued admiration for the growth of Holiday Night at the Marina each year. She added that she is proud to be part of the Port team and looks forward to its future. • Commissioner Preston expressed appreciation to staff for the holiday events. He shared that he attended the Edmonds Civic Roundtable, which featured Edmonds Police Chief Loi Dawkins. He noted that it was well attended and very informative. • Commissioner Grant thanked Commissioner Preston for his service as Commission President in 2025. He noted his attendance at the Edmonds Civic Roundtable and remarked that he looks forward to a productive 2026. He concluded by thanking his fellow Commissioners and the Port staff. • Commissioner Cass congratulated Commissioner Dimmick and Commissioner Grant on their new terms. She expressed appreciation for the holiday events and complimented the wonderful atmosphere at Holiday Night at the Marina. She attended a City of Edmonds Council meeting, where the discussion focused on rising construction costs and the significant impact that higher prices have on those pursuing new development. She and Commissioner Dimmick attended the U.S. Coast Guard Auxiliary, Flotilla 12, Change of Watch Luncheon for 2025, and she expressed strong appreciation for the group’s volunteer efforts. XIII. EXECUTIVE SESSION There was no Executive Session. XIV. ADJOURNMENT The Commission meeting was adjourned at 7:25 pm. Item 7.3 Packet pg. 86/223 The next Commission Meeting is scheduled for January 27, 2026, at 10:00 am. Jay Grant Port Commission Secretary Tags: Adopt 2026 Commission Committee Representatives and Liaison Assignments, ceremonial swearing-in of Commissioners Janelle Cass Jay Grant and Ross Dimmick, Election of Commission Officers, Port of Edmonds Meeting Minutes, Resolution No. 26-01 Confirming Schedule and Location of Meetings, Support of Highway 104 Graffiti Cleanup, Travel and Conference Schedule Review Item 7.3 Packet pg. 87/223 Commission Meeting Minutes 1-27-26 13 Feb Commission Meeting Minutes 1-27-26 Posted at 10:58h in Commission Notices by Editor 6 Port of Edmonds Commission Meeting – Minutes of Regular Meeting Meeting Date: January 27, 2026 Commissioners Present Janelle Cass, President Selena Killin, Vice President Jay Grant, Secretary David Preston Ross Dimmick Staff Present Brandon Baker, Executive Director Brittany Williams, Director of Economic Development Brian Menard, Director of Facilities and Maintenance Dennis Halpin, Marina Operations Manager John Peterman, Director of Finance and Administration Iliana Minkov, Leasing and Administrative Specialist Others Present Emily Guildner, Port Attorney Lou Billmyer, Port Finance Consultant I. CALL TO ORDER Commission President Cass called the meeting to order at 10:00 AM. II. FLAG SALUTE All those in attendance participated in the Pledge of Allegiance to the American Flag. III. MISSION STATEMENT Commissioner Killin read the Port of Edmonds’ mission statement: The mission of the Port of Edmonds is to provide value to our community through economic development, marina and commercial operations, waterfront public access, and environmental stewardship. IV. APPROVAL OF AGENDA COMMISSIONER DIMMICK MOVED THAT THE AGENDA BE APPROVED. COMMISSIONER GRANT SECONDED THE MOTION, WHICH CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. V. PUBLIC COMMENTS (Each comment shall generally be limited to 3 minutes or less and shall be limited to Port business) There were no public comments. Item 7.3 Packet pg. 88/223 VI. CONSENT AGENDA COMMISSIONER CASS MOVED THAT ITEM VI. A BE MOVED TO POSSIBLE ACTION. COMMISSIONER GRANT SECONDED THE MOTION, WHICH CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. COMMISSIONER GRANT MOVED THAT THE MODIFIED CONSENT AGENDA BE APPROVED. COMMISSIONER PRESTON SECONDED THE MOTION, WHICH CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.A. Approval of January 12, 2026 Meeting Minutes (Item VI.A was removed from the consent agenda for consideration under Possible Action B. Approval of Payments in the amount of $589,696.05 VII. CITY OF EDMONDS AND WOODWAY REPORTS There were no reports provided VIII. POSSIBLE ACTION A. Approval of January 12, 2026, Meeting Minutes Commissioner Cass initiated a discussion about the format and content of the Meeting Minutes, expressing concern that the current minutes lack detailed discussion points and presentation materials. The Commission discussed whether to include more detailed information while balancing staff time, with suggestions to use AI tools or verbatim transcription services. The Commission agreed to consider a compromise between brief and detailed minutes, potentially referencing agenda packets and recordings for additional context. The Commission and staff agreed to include discussion summaries for action items or decisions that generate robust conversation, with the goal of capturing and summarizing the key points raised. Commissioner Cass proposed that staff bring back amended minutes from the January 12, 2026, meeting, capturing high-level discussion and including all presentation materials. IX. INFORMATION A. 2025 4TH Quarter Commercial Portfolio Report Director Williams reported that two new tenants joined Harbor Square in Q4 2025 and that 10 lease extensions were completed, including a major 60-month renewal. She noted that occupancy reached 92.5% and that GPI rose 4% over Q3, despite a slight year-over-year dip due to reduced CAM charges. She summarized routine maintenance and testing completed during the quarter, along with two suite turnovers for incoming tenants. She added that discussions were underway with prospective tenants for the available space at the Port Administration building. Appreciation was expressed for the maintenance team and to Iliana Minkov for significant leasing achievements. B. 2025 4th Quarter and Annual Marina Operations Report Executive Director Baker delivered a presentation reporting strong performance across nearly all areas, including a 5-year high in document compliance at 87%. Additionally, he discussed quarterly trends, noting that one-way launches reached a 5-year high Item 7.3 Packet pg. 89/223 while total moves were at a 5-year low, attributed to weather, fishing, and fuel factors. The team highlighted a 14% increase in guest moorage nights and a 44% increase in Travelift stall usage. Security performance was also commendable, with a 5-year low in thefts and a 5-year high in On-View activities, demonstrating active engagement with the community. The discussion concluded with an explanation of typical 911 call scenarios, primarily involving park closures and reckless driving incidents. C. Space 101-D: Proposal for Port Use Port staff presented a proposal to repurpose space 101-D at Harbor Square, providing 857 square feet of industrial workspace as an alternative to the current 130-square-foot Maintenance Shop expansion project included in the 2026 budget. Staff explained that the revised option would provide greater flexibility, improved emergency preparedness access on the east side of the property, and enhanced storage capabilities with forklift access. COMMISSIONER GRANT MOVED TO ACCEPT THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE STAFF FOR SPACE 101-D AT HARBOR SQUARE. COMMISSIONER PRESTON SECONDED THE MOTION, WHICH CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. D. 2026 Meeting Topics and Draft Schedule The Commission reviewed the draft 2026 meeting schedule and planning materials. Staff invited Commissioner input on priorities and future topics, which President Cass and Executive Director Baker will incorporate into ongoing agenda development. The schedule remains a working draft and may be updated throughout the year. Staff also summarized routine meeting topics, confirmed future items, and potential 2026 subjects not yet scheduled. Commissioner Killin requested that the CP2 Committee explore engaging Ecological Land Services to advise on restoration and conservation options for the Unocal property, noting that funding may need to be budgeted. Commissioner Killin also reiterated the need for an ethical decision-making framework to guide upcoming master planning and major Port decisions. Commissioner Cass suggested inviting the Edmonds Yacht Club, Freedom Boat Club, Puget Sound Express, Fish and Wildlife, or other tenants to provide a presentation. X. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR’S REPORT Executive Director Baker discussed the following topics: • General Updates: • Annual equipment inspections • State Auditor’s Office 2024–2025 schedule • THUD appropriations • HAZWOPER training • NPSR project meeting with Senator Cantwell’s team Item 7.3 Packet pg. 90/223 • Completed Projects: • J Dock flotation • E Dock water repair • Project Updates: • Mid Marina Breakwater • Dry Storage C Row project • Dry Storage South Launcher cradle rebuild • Second floor window replacement – Building 1 (bid planning) • Ongoing Marina/Real Estate Projects: • Dock roof and gutter cleaning • Marina entrance signage • Dock pressure washing • Marina Operations Office remodel design XI. COMMISSIONER’S COMMENTS AND COMMITTEE REPORTS • Commissioner Dimmick thanked staff for providing the schedule outline, noting that it was very useful and effective as a planning tool. He also reported on his recent call with City of Edmonds Council President Dotsch and invited commissioners to share any topics they would like him to raise or add to the agenda for future discussions with the City. • Commissioner Grant welcomed the new Director of Finance and Administration, John Peterman, and thanked Representative Larsen and Senator Cantwell. He reported attending the Chamber’s recent “Morning Buzz” event, noting an excellent presentation by Port Architect John Jessen. Commissioner Grant also encouraged everyone to sign up for the Edmonds Civic Roundtable event on February 2nd, where the newly elected Council President will provide an overview of major upcoming council priorities. • Commissioner Killin expressed appreciation for staff, recognizing Tristan Guempel for his dedication and flexibility, congratulating Port’s Marina Manager Halpin on recent industry recognition, and welcoming John Peterman to the team. She then raised concerns about declining professionalism within the Commission, citing instances of packet materials not being reviewed in advance and an increase in behind-the-scenes lobbying on matters that should be discussed publicly. Killin noted that these practices slow decision-making, undermine transparency, and erode trust among commissioners, staff, and the public. Commissioner Killin urged a return to open, well-prepared, and transparent governance. • Commissioner Preston provided an update and reminder that the Seattle Boat Show will run from Friday, January 30, through Saturday, February 7, at Lumen Field Event Center. He also reported on attending a recent meeting at the Edmonds Yacht Club, where members inquired about the timeline for the upcoming Portwalk project. He noted that the exact schedule for the project is still not available. • Commissioner Cass welcomed the new Director of Finance and Administration and Item 7.3 Packet pg. 91/223 commented on the talent and dedication of the Port staff. She thanked staff for creatively solving the first-floor space challenges in the Administration Building to attract potential tenants and meet logistical needs. She reported on attending the Chamber of Commerce Board meeting, where she was pleased to share the on-time, under-budget completion of the Mid-Marina breakwater project. She also noted that the graffiti cleanup initiative is expected to be completed within the next two months, and that Rotary and Chamber members are enthusiastic about the effort. XII. ADJOURNMENT The Commission meeting was adjourned at 11:20 AM. The next Commission Meeting is scheduled for February 9, 2026, at 6:00 PM. Jay Grant Port Commission Secretary Tags: 2025 4th Quarter and Annual Marina Operations Report, 2025 4th Quarter Commercial Portfolio Report, 2026 Meeting Topics and Draft Schedule, 2026 Port of Edmonds Commission Meeting Minutes, Space 101-D: Proposal for Port Use Item 7.3 Packet pg. 92/223 Edmonds Public Facilities District Board Draft Minutes January 22, 2026 Page 1 M I N U T E S Edmonds Public Facilities District Board of Directors Meeting January 22, 2026 The Edmonds Public Facilities District Board hybrid meeting convened at 7:31 a.m. in the Edmonds Center for the Arts Green Room, 410 4th Avenue North, Edmonds, and via Zoom. EPFD Board Members Present ECA Board Members Present Wayne Grotheer, President Matt Cox, President Suzy Maloney, Vice President Jeff Lewis, Secretary/Treasurer David Brewster Scott Ely Guests Ray Liaw Chris Eck, City Council Liaison ECA Staff Present Caitlin Pontrella, Interim Executive Director Lori Meagher, Associate Executive Director 1. Call to Order Board President Grotheer called the EPFD Board meeting to order. • Attendance of those attending in-person for minutes. 2. Land Acknowledgement & Equity Statement Board Member Ely read the Land Acknowledgement & Equity Statement. 3. Agenda Review & Approval BOARD MEMBER LIAW MOVED TO ADD EPFD SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES 12/10/2025, 12/11/2025, 12/29/2025 TO THE CONSENT AGENDA, ADD JANUARY STAFF REPORT TO OLD BUSINESS, AND DELETE EPFD BOARD RESOLUTION 2026.01 AND EMPLOYEE HANDBOOK FROM PFD BOARD BUSINESS (WILL COME BACK AT A FUTURE MEETING). BOARD MEMBER ELY SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 4. Board President’s Comments Board President Grotheer welcomed Councilmember Eck back as the Council liaison. He recognized there are a number of major items on the agenda, relaying the quote, “never let a good crisis go to waste.” 5. Public Comment Councilmember Eck offered to help the organization in whatever way she can. 6. Consent Agenda • October-December 2025 Disbursement Reports Item 7.3 Packet pg. 93/223 Edmonds Public Facilities District Board Draft Minutes January 22, 2026 Page 2 • FY 2026 Rental Rates • EPFD Special Meeting Minutes 12/10/2025, 12/11/2025, 12/29/2025 BOARD MEMBER ELY MOVED TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA. BOARD MEMBER LIAW SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 7. Old Business • Prior Action Items Review Ms. Meagher reviewed progress on action items from the previous meeting and identified outstanding items (see Action Items below). • January Staff Report There were no board comments. 8. Interim Executive Director Update • 30 Day Report Ms. Pontrella reviewed the 30-Day Situation Report, highlighting four interconnected risks requiring immediate board attention:  Unresolved financial direction & strategic ambiguity  Unsustainable governance load and blurred roles  Leadership concentration and continuity risk  Unresolved issues from executive departure She reviewed Recommended Actions for PFD Board:  Review the 30-Day Situation Report and ask clarifying questions  Align and issue a clear directive on the financial direction of ECA  Review draft Emergency Succession Plan and discussion options for reducing risks in the short term  Determine action plan for addressing condition that contributed to the previous executive’s departure  Review Position Scope Recommendation from interim leadership and clarify goals for the interim period. Questions and discussion followed regarding challenges associated with resolving the operating deficit, under-investment in facilities, organizational capacity, impacts of Covid, the board having an honest conversation about the operating deficit, differences of opinion about how to address the operating deficit, the board being unwilling/unable to confront realities, the board being guided by EDs without examining their perspectives and assumptions, appreciation for Ms. Pontrella’s examination of the situation, addressing the operating deficit as quickly as possible and setting goals, being honest and bold in decision-making, the organization having a going concern issue, how long the organization can continue at this pace, the board’s agreement with operating rich such as growing staff and programs, stop kicking the can down the road, greater discipline of the ED by the board, building milestones to address the operating deficit and giving direction to the ED, determining what is core to the ECA’s mission and what can be eliminated. Questions and discussion continued regarding downsizing the organization to bring it closer to a balanced operating budget, intent of today’s discussion to reach alignment on the direction and Item 7.3 Packet pg. 94/223 Edmonds Public Facilities District Board Draft Minutes January 22, 2026 Page 3 pace, developing a plan to address the operating deficit by end of Q1, the ECA board’s position on the operating deficit, goal in the last strategic plan to implement strategies to reach a 5% operating margin, principles of financial success developed by Admin & Finance and consensus not to have an operating deficit, leadership changes providing an opportunity to reevaluate, educating the ECA board about issues facing the organization, determining and preserving the ECA’s core identity, determining next steps with the strategic plan and committee/taskforce structure, reduce committees to core needs, establishing 2-3 taskforces to focus on issues and identify Q1/Q2 deliverables, determining a realistic operating margin/profit, governance, mechanism for putting committees on hold, scope and expectations of the campus partnership taskforce, and understanding what the community wants from the ECA. Questions and discussion continued regarding whether the recent strategic planning process adequately surveyed the community, making a presentation/update to city council in Q2, determining what is untouchable/sacred to the community, educational versus revenue-generating opportunities, reducing committee meetings and holding joint ECA/EPFD board meetings, retaining the Admin & Finance, Philanthropy, and Steering committees and putting others on hiatus, having Admin & Finance be an open meeting, board members’ engagement/passion, joint operating agreement, executive membership of both boards meet to discuss committee structure and next steps regarding the strategic plan, reviewing the joint operating agreement and engaging the EPFD attorney regarding revisions, eliminating detailed staff-level reporting to boards, providing a platform for directors to highlight accomplishments, information/reports provided to the Emeritus Board, and informing board members/stakeholders of changes in reporting. 9. Executive Session • Pursuant to RCW 42.30.110((g) to Review the Performance of a Public Employee At 8:36 am, Board President Grotheer recessed the meeting to a 20 minute executive session regarding the item listed above. At 9:56 am, the executive session was extended to 9:11 am. At 9:11 am, the executive session was extended to 9:28 am. The meeting reconvened at 9:28 am. Note: The content of the remainder of the minutes is limited because the meeting was not recorded due to technical difficulties. 10. PFD Board Business • Interim Executive Director Scoping Assessment • Potential Adjustment to Interim ED Budget 11. Associate Executive Director Update • Finance Update November draft financials are included in the packet. December draft financials will be completed by the end of the month. • Human Resources Item 7.3 Packet pg. 95/223 Edmonds Public Facilities District Board Draft Minutes January 22, 2026 Page 4 12. PFD Board Member Reports Board Member Brewster offered to forward to Ms. Meagher a report from the Association of Washington State PFD’s lobbyist to be circulated to board members. 13. New Business 14. Adjourn The meeting was adjourned at 9:49 am. Next EPFD Board Meeting: Thursday, February 26, 2026 ACTION ITEMS: 1. Schedule Audit Exit Conference 2. Review joint operating agreement and engage EPFD attorney regarding revisions 3. Eliminate detailed staff-level reporting to board 4. Executive membership of both boards meet to discuss committee structure and next steps regarding the strategic plan 5. Distribute report from Association of Washington State PFD’s lobbyist to board members Future Items 1. Develop a plan to address operating deficit by end of Q1 2. Presentation/update to city council in Q2 3. EPFD Board Resolution 2026:01 – A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Edmonds Public Facilities District Delegating Contract Signing Authority to Designated Staff 4. Employee Handbook Item 7.3 Packet pg. 96/223 ArlingtonEdmondsEverettGranite FallsHousing Authority of Snohomish County Lake StevensLynnwoodMonroeMarysvilleMill CreekMountlake Terrace MukilteoSnohomishSnohomish CountyStanwoodWoodway Alliance for Housing Affordability Joint Board Wednesday, December 3, 2025 Via Microsoft Teams 4:30PM – 6:00 PM Meeting Minutes Participating: Kyoko Matsumoto-Wright City of Mountlake Terrace Liz Vogeli City of Everett Anji Jorstad City of Lake Stevens John Brock Town of Woodway Dan Rankin Town of Darrington George Hurst City of Lynnwood Amber Piona Snohomish County Russ Wright City of Lake Stevens Chris Eck City of Edmonds Peter Condyles City of Marysville Joshua Thompson Snohomish County Michelle Dotsch City of Edmonds Jacob Walker City of Monroe Linda Redmon City of Snohomish Jackie Anderson Snohomish County Ty Schroeder City of Stanwood Frank Hong City of Everett Chris Collier HASCO 1. Call to Order and Introductions Meeting was called to order at 4:32 by Liz Vogeli 2. Approval of Minutes Motion by Dan Rankin and Kyoko Matsumoto-Wright to approve Minutes from September 3, 2025. Motion passed unanimously. 3. Draft FY 27 Work Plan and Budget Chris Collier introduced the draft work plan and budget for fiscal year 2027, noting changes the setup following the approved amendment to FY26. Linda Redmon motioned Dan Rankin seconded adoption, motion passed unanimously. 4. Continuum of Care Update Chris Collier introduced an update to the Continuum of Care funding and provided a status update of federal funding, policy, and ongoing court cases. Snohomish County staff provided additional context to local concerns and activities. Item 7.3 Packet pg. 97/223 ArlingtonEdmondsEverettGranite FallsHousing Authority of Snohomish County Lake StevensLynnwoodMonroeMarysvilleMill CreekMountlake Terrace MukilteoSnohomishSnohomish CountyStanwoodWoodway 5. Fee in Lieu Calculator Demonstration Chris Collier demonstrated a new tool available to cities and planners to estimate a fee in lieu schedule for new construction that balances impact to developer (if providing affordable housing), potential revenue to the city (if fee in lieu paid), different income levels and a percentage of housing units it applies to. 6. New AHA Member Memo Discussion on a memo for AHA member cities to share with councilmembers for upcoming board and committee appointments. Chris Collier to prepare and distribute a 1-page summary of AHA to members. 7. Next Steps / Chair Meeting adjourned at 5:54. Next meeting to be held on February 4, 2026, at 4:30PM via MS Teams. Item 7.3 Packet pg. 98/223 City Council Agenda Item 8.1 February 24, 2026 - Regular Meeting TITLE:Approval of City Council Meeting Minutes (Only One Reading Required) DEPARTMENT:City Clerk's Office PRESENTER:Luke Lonie, City Clerk NEEDED FROM COUNCIL:Action RECOMMENDATION:Approve the minutes of the February 6, 2026 City Council Special Meeting, the February 10, 2026 City Council Regular Meeting, the February 11, 2026 City Council Study Session, the February 17, 2026 City Council Finance Committee Meeting, the February 17, 2026 City Council Parks and Public Works (PPW) Committee Meeting, and the February 17, 2026 City Council Public Safety, Planning, Human Services, and Personnel (PSPHSP) Committee Meeting. BUDGET: Total Dollar Amount:N/A ☐ Approved in Budget Fund(s):N/A ☐ Budget Reallocation Required ☒ No Budget Impact PROBLEM/ISSUE STATEMENT: N/A CONTEXT, ANALYSIS, & ALTERNATIVES: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Approve the minutes of the February 6, 2026 City Council Special Meeting, the February 10, 2026 City Council Regular Meeting, the February 11, 2026 City Council Study Session, the February 17, 2026 City Council Finance Committee Meeting, the February 17, 2026 City Council Parks and Public Works (PPW) Committee Meeting, and the February 17, 2026 City Council Public Safety, Planning, Human Services, and Personnel (PSPHSP) Committee Meeting. BUDGET IMPACTS: N/A ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: ATTACHMENTS: 1. 2026-02-06 Council Retreat Draft Minutes 2. 2026-02-10 Council Minutes Draft 3. 2026-02-11 Council Study Session Draft Minutes 4. 2026-02-17 Council Finance Committee Draft Minutes 5. 2026-02-17 Council PPW Committee Draft Minutes 6. 2026-02-17 Council PSPHSP Committee Draft Minutes Item 8.1 Packet pg. 99/223 Edmonds City Council Minutes Special Meeting – Council Retreat February 06, 2026 Page 16 2 6 Edmonds City Council Special Meeting – Council Retreat Meeting Minutes February 6, 2026 1.CALL TO ORDER / FLAG SALUTE Mayor Rosen called the meeting to order at 8:30 am. 2.LAND ACKNOWLEDGMENT Mayor Rosen read the City’s Land Acknowledgement. 3.ROLL CALL City Clerk Luke Lonie called the roll. All members were present at the time of roll call with the exception of Councilmember Olson, who arrived at 8:38 am, and Councilmember Nand, who arrived at 8:43 am. 4.COUNCIL BUSINESS 1.Greeting and Overview – Council Council President Dotsch opened the Council Retreat and outlined its intent. 2.GFOA / Performance Management Framework – Council Interim City Administrator Todd Tatum briefed Council on the Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) and presented on financial performance indicators and metrics that affect the Edmonds community. Councilmembers asked questions of Interim City Administrator Tatum 3.Community Priorities & City Mission Statement Review – Council Council President Dotsch lead a discussion on the City’s priorities and vision statement based upon the community survey and the GFOA presentation. Council President went over the next steps and what to do with the information received in the survey and presented by staff and Council President. 4.Break – Council Council took a break from 9:20 am – 9:30 am. 5.Priority Setting Workshop – Council Interim City Administrator Todd Tatum led a series of exercises intended to identify the needs of the community and align the City’s priorities with those needs. 6.Break – Council Council took a break from 11:50 am – 12:05 pm. 7.Working Lunch -Tyler Software Update – Council Item 8.1 Packet pg. 100/223 Edmonds City Council Minutes Special Meeting – Council Retreat February 06, 2026 Page 26 2 6 Brian Tuley, Information Services Manager, briefed Council on the status of the financial software transition to Tyler Enterprises and requested input to identify next steps. 8.Communication Practices Update – Council Natasha Ryan, Public Information Officer, presented guidelines and best practices for communication in government. 9.Administrative Legislative Calendar Review – Council Mayor Rosen and City Clerk Luke Lonie provided an overview of the administrative legislative calendar, including updates to Council committee structure. 10.Break – Council (15 minutes) Council took a break from 1:45 pm – 2:00 pm. 11.Next Steps and Implementation – Council (60 minutes) Interim City Administrator Todd Tatum reviewed the products of the earlier exercises and used them to identify next steps for implementing a structure consistent with the results of the Community Survey. 12.Wrap Up – Council (30 minutes) Council President Dotsch thanked staff for the work that went into the retreat. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 2:24 pm. Item 8.1 Packet pg. 101/223 Edmonds City Council Minutes Regular Meeting February 10, 2026 Page 1 Edmonds City Council Regular Meeting Action Minutes February 10, 2026 ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT Mike Rosen, Mayor Michelle Dotsch, Council President Will Chen, Councilmember Erika Barnett, Councilmember Susan Paine, Councilmember Chris Eck, Councilmember Jenna Nand, Councilmember Vivian Olson, Councilmember STAFF PRESENT Jeff Taraday, City Attorney Luke Lonie, City Clerk Andy Rheaume, Public Works Director Mike Clugston, Planning & Development Director Mike DeLilla, City Engineer 1.CALL TO ORDER / FLAG SALUTE The Edmonds City Council meeting was called to order at 6:00pm by Mayor Rosen in the Council Chambers, 250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds, and virtually. The meeting was opened with the flag salute. 2.LAND ACKNOWLEDGMENT Councilmember Chen read the City Council Land Acknowledgment. 3.ROLL CALL City Clerk Lonie called the roll. All elected officials were present. 4.APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA COUNCILMEMBER PAINE MOVED APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 5.PRESENTATION 1.Mayor's Finance Update – Mayor’s Office Mayor Rosen commented on financial matters. 6.AUDIENCE COMMENTS 1. Kristina S. – Expressed concern with accessibility in various areas around Edmonds. 2. Stephanie McLaughlin– Requested that the lead agency issue a determination of significance and require an environmental impact statement for the Lynnwood Wastewater Treatment Plant. 3. Lizzie Doormyer – Loves the City of Edmonds for its beauty, the salmon run, and proximity to Puget Sound. Item 8.1 Packet pg. 102/223 Edmonds City Council Minutes Regular Meeting February 10, 2026 Page 2 4. Bob Brunette – Asked that the City take action to protect the environment around the Lynnwood Wastewater Treatment Plant. 5. Bruce Buchanan – Expressed concern with the various types of pollution created by the Lynnwood Wastewater Treatment Plant. 6. Steve Fisher – Expressed concern with the noise pollution created by the Lynnwood Wastewater Treatment Plant. 7.Jon Allen – Expressed concern with potential contradictions with state law and Edmonds Code 7.RECEIVED FOR FILING 1.WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS FIRST READING 2.APPOINTMENT OF COUNCILMEMBERS TO COUNCIL COMMITTEES FOR 2026 FIRST READING 8.APPROVAL OF THE CONSENT AGENDA COUNCILMEMBER NAND MOVED TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. The agenda items approved are as follows: 1.APPROVAL OF COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 2.APPROVAL OF CLAIM CHECKS. FIRST READING 3.APPROVAL OF PAYROLL AND BENEFIT CHECKS, DIRECT DEPOSIT AND WIRE FIRST READING 4.WASTEWATER TREATMENT, DISPOSAL AND TRANSPORT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT AMENDMENT NO. 6 5.REVISION TO SECTION 17.95.090 OF ECC – COMMUTE TRIP REDUCTION SECOND READING 6.SNOHOMISH COUNTY ILA SECOND READING 7.RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE BID RECOMMENDATIONS SECOND READING 9.COUNCIL BUSINESS 1.Jacobs On Call Services Contract – Public Works and Utilities Andy Rheuame, Public Works Director, provided background into the need for the Jacobs On Call Services Contract and asked that Council approve the item. COUNCILMEMBER NAND MOVED THAT COUNCIL AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT WITH JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP, INC. IN THE AMOUNT OF $500,000. THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 2.Action on Six-Month Moratorium on Permit Applications Within the Deer Creek Critical Aquifer Recharge Area (CARA) that Would Require Stormwater Management – Planning and Development Services Mike Clugston, Planning and Development Director; Andy Rheuame, Public Works Director; and Mike DeLilla, City Engineer, presented the draft scope of work related to the stormwater study requested by Council and requested that they adopt a moratorium on permit applications within the Deer Creek Critical Aquifer Recharge Area (CARA). Item 8.1 Packet pg. 103/223 Edmonds City Council Minutes Regular Meeting February 10, 2026 Page 3 COUNCILMEMBER PAINE MOVED TO ADOPT AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING A SIX-MONTH MORATORIUM ON PERMIT APPLICATIONS WITHIN THE DEER CREEK CRITICAL AQUIFER RECHARGE AREA THAT WOULD REQUIRE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AND SET THE REQUIRED PUBLIC HEARING FOR THE MORATORIUM FOR MARCH 3, 2026. THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 10.COUNCIL COMMENTS Councilmembers commented on various topics. 11.MAYOR'S COMMENTS Mayor Rosen provided comments. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 7:19 pm. Item 8.1 Packet pg. 104/223 Edmonds City Council Minutes Study Session February 11, 2026 Page 1 Edmonds City Council Study Session Meeting Minutes February 11, 2026 ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT Michelle Dotsch, Council President Will Chen, Councilmember Erika Barnett, Councilmember Susan Paine, Councilmember Chris Eck, Councilmember Jenna Nand, Councilmember Vivian Olson, Councilmember STAFF PRESENT Emily Villata, Deputy City Clerk Todd Tatum, Acting City Administrator 1.CALL TO ORDER The Edmonds Council Study Session was called to order virtually and in the City Council Conference Room, 121 – 5th Avenue North, Edmonds, at 3:00 pm by Council President Dotsch. 2.STUDY SESSION ITEMS 1.Response to Emails Sent to Council Office First Reading – City Council Office Council President Dotsch presented the first item which would implement an auto-reply to individuals who contact the council@edmondswa.gov email address as a form of acknowledgment that their message has been successfully received by Council. 2.Council Priority Topics and Final Wording First Reading – City Council Office Council read through and discussed a worksheet of draft priorities identified during the most recent council-staff retreat. Draft priorities focused on include: Financial Stability Strategic Clarity and Direction Prioritization, Trade-offs, and Capacity Economic Development Engagement, Communication, and Transparency 3.ITEMS FOR FUTURE CONSENT ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 4:30 pm. Item 8.1 Packet pg. 105/223 Edmonds City Council Minutes Finance Committee February 17, 2026 Page 1 Edmonds City Council Finance Committee Meeting Minutes February 17, 2026 ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT Michelle Dotsch, Council President Will Chen, Councilmember Erika Barnett, Councilmember Susan Paine, Councilmember Chris Eck, Councilmember STAFF PRESENT Luke Lonie, City Clerk Richard Gould, Finance Direction 1.CALL TO ORDER The Edmonds Council Finance Committee meeting was called to order virtually and in the City Council Conference Room, 121 – 5th Avenue North, Edmonds, at 1:00 pm by Councilmember Chen. 2.COMMITTEE BUSINESS 1.Preliminary December 2025 Monthly Financial Report First Reading – Finance Richard Gould, Finance Director, presented the preliminary December financial report to the Finance Committee. Committee Recommendation: Move to Received for Filing ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 2:29 pm. Item 8.1 Packet pg. 106/223 Edmonds City Council Minutes Parks and Public Works (PPW) Committee February 17, 2026 Page 1 Edmonds City Council Parks and Public Works (PPW) Committee Meeting Minutes February 17, 2026 ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT Michelle Dotsch, Council President Susan Paine, Councilmember Chris Eck, Councilmember Vivian Olson, Councilmember STAFF PRESENT Luke Lonie, City Clerk Bertrand Hauss, Transportation Engineer Mike DeLilla, City Engineer 1.CALL TO ORDER The Edmonds Council Parks and Public Works (PPW) Committee meeting was called to order virtually and in the City Council Conference Room, 121 – 5th Avenue North, Edmonds, at 3:00 pm by Councilmember Olson. 2.COMMITTEE BUSINESS 1.Community Transit Contract as part of Hwy 99 Revitalization Project Stage 3 First Reading – Engineering Bertrand Hauss, Transportation Engineer, and Mike DeLilla, City Engineer, presented the community transit contract related to the revitalization and construction on Highway 99 and asked that the committee move the item to a future consent agenda. Committee Recommendation: Move to Consent Agenda 2.Presentation of PSA for Water Comprehensive Plan Update First Reading – Engineering Mike DeLilla, City Engineer, presented the water comprehensive plan update to the committee and requested that the item move to consent. Committee Recommendation: Move to Consent Agenda 3.Options for the Wayside Horn at Dayton St. Railroad Crossing First Reading – Engineering Bertrand Hauss, Transportation Engineer, presented the wayside horn options which will be installed at the Dayton St. railroad crossing and requested that it go to a future agenda. Committee Recommendation: Move to Full Council Business ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 3:55 pm. Item 8.1 Packet pg. 107/223 Edmonds City Council Minutes Public Safety, Planning, Human Services, and Personnel (PSPHSP) Committee February 17, 2026 Page 1 Edmonds City Council Public Safety, Planning, Human Services, and Personnel (PSPHSP) Committee Meeting Minutes February 17, 2026 ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT Michelle Dotsch, Council President Will Chen, Councilmember Erika Barnett, Councilmember Susan Paine, Councilmember Chris Eck, Councilmember Jenna Nand, Councilmember Vivian Olson, Councilmember STAFF PRESENT Luke Lonie, City Clerk Angie Feser, Parks, Recreation, and Human Services Director Emily Wagener, Human Resources Analyst 1.CALL TO ORDER The Edmonds Council Public Safety, Planning, Human Services, and Personnel (PSPHSP) Committee meeting was called to order virtually and in the City Council Conference Room, 121 – 5th Avenue North, Edmonds, at 4:30 pm by Councilmember Nand. 2.COMMITTEE BUSINESS 1.Parks Maintenance Worker Position Conversion First Reading – Parks, Recreation and Human Services Angie Feser, Parks, Recreation, and Human Services Director, proposed changing one parks maintenance worker position to a parks lead position and requested that the item move to a future consent agenda. Committee Recommendation: Move to Consent Agenda 2.Ordinance Amending Authorized Employee Positions First Reading – Human Resources Emily Wagener, Human Resources Analyst, presented the ordinance amending current employee positions, also known as the positions ordinance, and asked that it be moved to a future consent agenda. Committee Recommendation: Move to Consent Agenda (at a later date than the parks maintenance worker item) ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 4:46 pm. Item 8.1 Packet pg. 108/223 City Council Agenda Item 8.2 February 24, 2026 - Regular Meeting TITLE:Approval of PSA for Water Comprehensive Plan Update (Second Reading) DEPARTMENT:Engineering PRESENTER:Mike De Lilla NEEDED FROM COUNCIL:Action RECOMMENDATION:I move to approve the professional services agreement with Consor in the amount of $535,684. BUDGET: Total Dollar Amount:535,684 ☒ Approved in Budget Fund(s):421 ☐ Budget Reallocation Required ☐ No Budget Impact PROBLEM/ISSUE STATEMENT: The City’s current Water Comprehensive Plan was written in 2017 and needs to be updated by the end of 2027. CONTEXT, ANALYSIS, & ALTERNATIVES: The Comprehensive Water System Plan is required to be updated every ten years to meet the planning requirements of the Washington State Department of Health (DOH) and the Growth Management Act (GMA). The purpose of the plan is to meet the State’s regulatory requirements and to provide the City with a useful working document to guide planning, scheduling, and budgeting of water system improvements and replacements. The key elements to be addressed include a water system analysis, capital facility plan, financial program, operations and maintenance program and water conservation analysis. A Request for Qualifications (RFQ) was advertised November 25 and December 2, 2025. The City received two Statement of Qualifications (SOQ), from Consor North America, Inc. and Infractiv. The SOQ were evaluated based on the consultants’ Project Approach, Related Experience of Firms on Team, Qualifications of Proposed Project Manager, Expertise of Key Staff (Prime and Sub Consultants), and References/Past Performance. Consor was selected based on the evaluation results of the SOQ, which included their extensive knowledge of Edmonds’ potable water system and their experience preparing water system plans for agencies throughout the Puget Sound. There will be opportunities for public comment on the draft plan, with these comments/input being included in the final adopted comprehensive water system plan. RECOMMENDATION: I move to approve the professional services agreement with Consor in the amount of $535,684. BUDGET IMPACTS: n/a Item 8.2 Packet pg. 109/223 ITEM HISTORY: ,On February 17, 2026, this item was presented to the Parks and Public Works Committee and it was forwarded to the consent agenda for approval. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 – agreement (approved to form) Item 8.2 Packet pg. 110/223 CITY OF EDMONDS 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH · EDMONDS, WA 98020 · 425-771-0220 · WWW.EDMONDSWA.GOV PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT | ENGINEERING DIVISION MIKE ROSEN MAYOR 1 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) is made and entered into between the City of Edmonds, hereinafter referred to as the “City,” and Consor North America, Inc., hereinafter referred to as the “Consultant.” WHEREAS, the City desires to engage the professional services and assistance of a consulting firm to provide engineering services with respect to the Water Comprehensive Plan Update project; and WHEREAS, the Consultant has the necessary skills and experience, and desires to provide such services to the City; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual benefits accruing, it is agreed by and between the parties hereto as follows: 1. Scope of work. The scope of work shall include all services and material necessary to accomplish the above-mentioned objectives in accordance with the Scope of Work that is marked as Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. 2. Payments. The Consultant shall be paid by the City for completed work for services rendered under this Agreement as provided hereinafter. Such payment shall be full compensation for work performed or services rendered and for all labor, materials, supplies, equipment and incidentals necessary to complete the work. A. Payment for work accomplished under the terms of this Agreement shall be on a time and expense basis as set forth in Exhibit B; provided, in no event shall the payment for work performed pursuant to this Agreement exceed the sum of FIVE HUNDRED THIRTY-FIVE THOUSAND SIX HUNDRED EIGHTY-FOUR DOLLARS ($535,684). B. All vouchers shall be submitted by the Consultant to the City for payment pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. The City shall pay the appropriate amount for each voucher to the Consultant. The Consultant may submit vouchers to the City monthly during the progress of the work for payment of completed phases of the project. Billings shall be reviewed in conjunction with the City’s warrant process. No billing shall be considered for payment that has not been submitted to the City three (3) days prior to the scheduled cut-off date. Such late vouchers will be checked by the City and payment will be made in the next regular payment cycle. C. The costs records and accounts pertaining to this Agreement are to be kept available for inspection by representatives of the City for a period of three (3) years after final payment. Copies shall be made available upon request. Item 8.2 Packet pg. 111/223 2 3. Ownership and use of documents. All research, tests, surveys, preliminary data, reports, and any and all other work product prepared or gathered by the Consultant in preparation for the services rendered by the Consultant under this Agreement shall be and are the property of the Consultant, provided, however, that: A. All final reports, presentations, documentation and testimony prepared by the Consultant shall become the property of the City upon their presentation to and acceptance by the City and shall at that date become the property of the City. B. The City shall have the right, upon reasonable request, to inspect, review and copy any work product during normal office hours. Documents prepared under this Agreement and in the possession of the Consultant may be subject to public records request and release under Chapter 42.56 RCW. C. In the event that the Consultant shall default on this Agreement, or in the event that this Agreement shall be terminated prior to its completion as herein provided, the work product of the Consultant, along with a summary of work done to date of default or termination, shall become the property of the City and tender of the work product and summary shall be a prerequisite to final payment under this Agreement. The summary of work done shall be prepared at no additional cost. 4. Time of performance. The Consultant shall perform the work authorized by this Agreement promptly in accordance with the receipt of the required governmental approvals. 5. Indemnification / Hold harmless agreement. The Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its officers, officials, agents, employees, and volunteers harmless from and shall process and defend at its own expense any and all claims, injuries, damages, losses, demands, or suits at law or equity to the extent arising from the negligent acts, errors or omissions of the Consultant in the performance of this Agreement, or breach of any of its obligations under this Agreement, except for injuries and damages caused by the sole negligence of the City. Should a court of competent jurisdiction determine that this Agreement is subject to RCW 4.24.115, then, in the event of liability for damages arising out of bodily injury to persons or damages to property caused by or resulting from the concurrent negligence of the Consultant and the City, its officers, officials, agents, employees, and volunteers, the Consultant’s liability, including the duty and cost to defend, hereunder shall be limited to the extent of the Consultant’s proportionate share of fault as determined by settlement, adjudication, or alternative dispute resolution. The Consultant shall comply with all applicable sections of the applicable Ethics laws, including RCW 42.23, which is the Code of Ethics for regulating contract interest by municipal officers. The Consultant specifically assumes potential liability for actions brought by the Consultant’s own employees against the City and, solely for the purpose of this indemnification and defense, the Consultant specifically waives any immunity under the state industrial insurance law, Title 51 RCW. This waiver has been mutually negotiated by the parties. The provisions of this section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. Item 8.2 Packet pg. 112/223 3 6. General and professional liability insurance. The Consultant shall obtain and keep in force during the term of this Agreement, or as otherwise required, the following insurance with companies or through sources approved by the State Insurance Commissioner pursuant to Title 48 RCW. Insurance Coverage A. Worker’s compensation and employer’s liability insurance as required by the State. B. Commercial general liability and property damage insurance in an aggregate amount not less than two million dollars ($2,000,000) for bodily injury, including death and property damage. The per occurrence amount shall be written with limits no less than one million dollars ($1,000,000). C. Vehicle liability insurance for any automobile used in an amount not less than a one million dollars ($1,000,000) combined single limit. D. Professional liability insurance in the amount of one million dollars ($1,000,000). Excepting the Worker’s Compensation Insurance and Professional Liability Insurance secured by the Consultant, the City will be named on all policies as an additional insured. The Consultant shall furnish the City with verification of insurance and endorsements required by the Agreement. The City reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies at any time. All insurance shall be obtained from an insurance company authorized to do business in the State of Washington. The Consultant shall submit a verification of insurance as outlined above within fourteen days of the execution of this Agreement to the City. No cancellation of the foregoing policies shall be effective without thirty (30) days prior notice to the City. The Consultant’s professional liability to the City shall be limited to the amount payable under this Agreement or one million dollars ($1,000,000), whichever is the greater, unless modified elsewhere in this Agreement. In no case shall the Consultant’s professional liability to third parties be limited in any way. 7. Discrimination prohibited. The Consultant shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, national origin, age, sex, sexual orientation, marital status, veteran status, liability for service in the armed forces of the United States, disability, or the presence of any sensory, mental or physical handicap, or any other protected class status, unless based upon a bona fide occupational qualification. 8. Consultant is an independent contractor. The parties intend that an independent contractor relationship will be created by this Agreement. No agent, employee or representative of the Consultant shall be deemed to be an agent, employee or representative of the City for any purpose. The Consultant shall be solely responsible for all acts of its agents, employees, representatives and subcontractors during the performance of this Agreement. 9. City approval of work and relationships. Notwithstanding the Consultant’s status as an independent contractor, results of the work performed pursuant to this Agreement must meet the approval of the City. During pendency of this Agreement, the Consultant shall not perform work for any party with respect to any property located within the City of Edmonds or for any project subject to the administrative or quasijudicial review of the City without written notification to the City and the City’s prior written consent. Item 8.2 Packet pg. 113/223 4 10. Termination. This being an Agreement for professional services, either party may terminate this Agreement for any reason upon giving the other party written notice of such termination no fewer than ten (10) days in advance of the effective date of said termination. Payment under this Agreement is subject to the appropriation of funds for these purposes. In the event funds are not appropriated, the City reserves the right to terminate this Agreement effective immediately and shall provide the Consultant with written notice of immediate termination. 11. Integration. The Agreement between the parties shall consist of this document, its Appendices 1 & 2, and the Scope of Work and fee schedule attached hereto as Exhibits A and B. These writings constitute the entire Agreement of the parties and shall not be amended except by a writing executed by both parties. In the event of any conflict between this written Agreement and any provision of Exhibits A and B, this Agreement shall control. 12. Changes/Additional Work. The City may engage the Consultant to perform services in addition to those listed in this Agreement, and the Consultant will be entitled to additional compensation for authorized additional services or materials. The City shall not be liable for additional compensation until and unless any and all additional work and compensation is approved in advance in writing and signed by both parties to this Agreement. If conditions are encountered which are not anticipated in the Scope of Work, the City understands that a revision to the Scope of Work and fees may be required. Provided, however, that nothing in this paragraph shall be interpreted to obligate the Consultant to render services, or the City to pay for services rendered, in excess of the Scope of Work in Exhibit A unless or until an amendment to this Agreement is approved in writing by both parties. 13. Standard of Care. The Consultant represents that the Consultant has the necessary knowledge, skill and experience to perform services required by this Agreement. The Consultant and any persons employed by the Consultant shall use their best efforts to perform the work in a professional manner consistent with sound practices, in accordance with the schedules herein and in accordance with the usual and customary professional care required for services of the type described in the Scope of Work. 14. Non-waiver. Waiver by the City of any provision of this Agreement or any time limitation provided for in this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other provision. 15. Non-assignable. The services to be provided by the Consultant shall not be assigned or subcontracted without the express written consent of the City. 16. Covenant against contingent fees. The Consultant warrants that he/she/they has/have not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for the Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement, and that he/she/they has/have not paid or agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for the Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gifts, or any other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award of making of this Agreement. For breach or violation of this warranty, the City shall have the right to annul this Agreement without liability or, in its discretion to deduct from the contract price or consideration, or otherwise recover, the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift, or contingent fee. Item 8.2 Packet pg. 114/223 5 17.Compliance with laws. The Consultant in the performance of this Agreement shall comply with all applicable Federal, State or local laws and ordinances, including regulations for licensing, certification and operation of facilities, programs and accreditation, and licensing of individuals, and any other standards or criteria as described in the Agreement to assure quality of services. Because this Agreement is subject to federal nondiscrimination laws, the Consultant agrees that the provisions of Appendices 1 & 2, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, apply to this Agreement. The Consultant specifically agrees to pay any applicable business and occupation (B & O) taxes which may be due on account of this Agreement. 18.Notices. Notices to the City of Edmonds shall be sent to the following address: City of Edmonds 121 Fifth Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 Notices to the Consultant shall be sent to the following address: Consor North America, Inc. 600 University Street, Suite 300 Seattle, WA 98101 Receipt of any notice shall be deemed effective three (3) days after deposit of written notice in the U.S. mails, with proper postage and properly addressed. DATED THIS _____ day of _______________ 2026. CITY OF EDMONDS CONSOR NORTH AMERICA, INC. Lael Alderman, Vice President Mike Rosen, Mayor ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: ________________________________ Luke Lonie, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: ________________________________ Office of the City Attorney Item 8.2 Packet pg. 115/223 6 ) )ss STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING ) On this day of 2026, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared Lael Alderman, Vice President, to me known to be the person who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said person, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he/she was authorized to execute said instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year first above written. NOTARY PUBLIC My commission expires: Item 8.2 Packet pg. 116/223 7 APPENDIX 1 CONTRACT (Appendix A of USDOT 1050.2A Standard Title VI Assurances) During the performance of this Agreement, the Consultant/Contractor, for itself, its assignees, and successors in interest (hereinafter collectively referred to as the “Consultant/Contractor”) agrees as follows: 1. Compliance with Regulations: The Consultant/Contractor shall comply with the acts and regulations relative to nondiscrimination in federally-assisted programs of the United States Department of Transportation (USDOT), Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 21 (49 CFR 21), as they may be amended from time to time (hereinafter referred to as the Regulations), which are herein incorporated by reference and made a part of this Agreement. 2. Nondiscrimination: The Consultant/Contractor, with regard to the work performed by it during the Agreement, shall not discriminate on the grounds of race, color, national origin, sex, age, disability, income-level, or LEP in the selection and retention of subcontractors, including procurement of materials and leases of equipment. The Consultant/Contractor shall not participate directly or indirectly in the discrimination prohibited by Section 21.5 of the Regulations, including employment practices when the Agreement covers any activity, project, or program set forth in Appendix B of 49 CFR 21. 3. Solicitations for Subcontracts, Including Procurements of Materials and Equipment: In all solicitations, either by competitive bidding, or negotiation made by the Consultant/ Contractor for work to be performed under a subcontract, including procurement of materials, or leases of equipment, each potential subcontractor or supplier shall be notified by the Consultant/Contractor of the Consultant’s/Contractor’s obligations under this Agreement and the Regulations relative to nondiscrimination on the grounds of race, color, national origin, sex, age, disability, income-level, or LEP. 4. Information and Reports: The Consultant/Contractor shall provide all information and reports required by the Regulations and directives issued pursuant thereto, and shall permit access to its books, records, accounts, other sources of information, and its facilities as may be determined by the City or the appropriate state or federal agency to be pertinent to ascertain compliance with such Regulations, orders, and instructions. Where any information required of a Consultant/Contractor is in the exclusive possession of another who fails or refuses to furnish the information, the Consultant/Contractor shall so certify to the City, or state or federal agency, as appropriate, and shall set forth what efforts it has made to obtain the information. 5. Sanctions for Noncompliance: In the event of the Consultant’s/Contractor’s noncompliance with the nondiscrimination provisions of this Agreement, the City shall impose such contract sanctions as it or the appropriate state or federal agency may determine to be appropriate, including, but not limited to: • Withholding of payments to the Consultant/Contractor under the Agreement until the Consultant/Contractor complies; and/or • Cancellation, termination, or suspension of the Agreement, in whole or in part. 6. Incorporation of Provisions: The Consultant/Contractor shall include the provisions of the above paragraphs one (1) through five (5) in every subcontract, including procurement of materials and leases of equipment, unless exempt by the Regulations, or directives issued pursuant thereto. The Consultant/Contractor shall take such action with respect to any subcontractor or procurement as the City or appropriate state or federal agency may direct as a means of enforcing such provisions, including sanctions for noncompliance. Provided, that if the Consultant/Contractor becomes involved in, or is threatened with, litigation by a subcontractor or supplier as a result of such direction, the Consultant/ Contractor may request that the City enter into such litigation to protect the interests of the City; or may request that the appropriate state agency enter into such litigation to protect the interests of the State of Washington. In addition, the Consultant/Contractor may request the appropriate federal agency enter into such litigation to protect the interests of the United States. Item 8.2 Packet pg. 117/223 8 APPENDIX 2 CONTRACT (Appendix E of USDOT 1050.2A Standard Title VI Assurances) During the performance of this Agreement, the Consultant/Contractor, for itself, its assignees, and successors in interest (hereinafter collectively referred to as the “Consultant/Contractor”) agrees to comply with the following non-discrimination statutes and authorities, including but not limited to: Pertinent Non-Discrimination Authorities: • Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. § 2000d et seq., 78 stat. 252), (prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin); and 49 CFR Part 21; • The Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, (42 U.S.C. § 4601), (prohibits unfair treatment of persons displaced or whose property has been acquired because of Federal or Federal-aid programs and projects); • Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1973, (23 U.S.C. § 324 et seq.), (prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex); • Section 504 of Rehabilitation Act of 1973, (29 U.S.C. § 794 et seq.), as amended, (prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability); and 49 CFR Part 27; • The Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended, (42 U.S.C. § 6101 et seq.), (prohibits discrimination on the basis of age); • Airport and Airway Improvement Act of 1982, (49 U.S.C. § 471, Section 47123), as amended, (prohibits discrimination based on race, creed, color, national origin, or sex); • The Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987, (PL 100-209), (Broadened the scope, coverage and applicability of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, The Age Discrimination Act of 1975 and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, by expanding the definition of the terms “programs or activities” to include all of the programs or activities of the Federal-aid recipients, sub-recipients and contractors, whether such programs or activities are Federally funded or not); • Titles II and III of the Americans with Disabilities Act, which prohibit discrimination on the basis of disability in the operation of public entities, public and private transportation systems, places of public accommodation, and certain testing entities (42 U.S.C. §§ 12131-12189) as implemented by Department of Transportation regulations at 49 C.F.R. parts 37 and 38; • The Federal Aviation Administration’s Non-Discrimination statute (49 U.S.C. § 47123) (prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, and sex); • Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, as amended, which prohibits you from discriminating because of sex in education programs or activities (20 U.S.C. 1681 et seq). Item 8.2 Packet pg. 118/223 Consor • February 2026 • City of Edmonds Update of Water System Plan • 1 EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF SERVICES Update of Water System Plan City of Edmonds, Washington Introduction This Scope of Services is for engineering services between Consor North America, Inc. (Consor) and the City of Edmonds (City). Work authorized by this scope is for engineering services to develop the 2027 Comprehensive Water System Plan (WSP). The WSP will document the evaluation of the City’s existing infrastructure to determine how to meet projected demands and regulatory requirements over a 20-year planning horizon. In addition, water system needs and deficiencies identified in the recently completed hydraulic model update and other water system asset management assessments and plans will be incorporated into the WSP. These needs and deficiencies will inform the City’s ongoing Capital Improvement Program (CIP) as well as operations and maintenance strategies for the 20-year planning period. Project Understanding The WSP will serve as an update to the City’s 2017 Water Comprehensive Plan and provide the City with a Washington State Department of Health (DOH) approved WSP to address Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 246-290-100. The tasks in this Scope are structured to align with the DOH Water System Planning Guidebook structure. The WSP will be structured to align with the 2017 Water Comprehensive Plan, including the major chapters developed under the corresponding tasks indicated below. WSP Chapter Title Scope Task Front End Cover, Table of Contents, Executive Summary 11 1 Introduction 3 2 Water System Description 3,5 3 Land Use and Population 3,4 4 Water Demands 4,6 5 Policies and Design Criteria 3,8 6 Water Source and Quality 5 7 Operations and Maintenance 7 8 Water System Analyses 5 9 Water System Improvements 5,9 10 Financial Plan 10 Appendix Appendices 11 The WSP will provide documentation of planning information for the current, 10 and 20-year planning horizons. The financial analysis including development of Chapter 10 will be completed by sub-consultant FCS, a Bowman Company (FCS). Item 8.2 Packet pg. 119/223 Consor • February 2026 • City of Edmonds Update of Water System Plan • 2 General Assumptions The following general assumptions were made to establish the Scope of Services and Fee Estimate for this project; task specific assumptions are provided under each task:  The City will provide clear, concise, and timely input and review on the work products produced by Consor within 15 working days, unless otherwise specified in this Scope. Review comments to be consolidated into one document before submitting to Consor.  File sharing between Consor and the City will be through a SharePoint site set-up and maintained by Consor.  All draft WSP chapter deliverables will be provided in electronic (Word) format with PDF figures.  All deliverables will be in electronic format delivered via email or electronic file transfer. Final documents will be signed electronically and submitted to the City electronically. Final deliverables will be in both pdf and native file format.  All deliverables will be limited to one round of review by City.  Review comments will be compiled by the City into a single document before submitting to Consor. One submittal of comments will be provided per document.  A Source Water Protection section will be a brief statement that the City of Everett, the Alderwood Water and Wastewater District (AWWD), and Seattle Public Utilities are responsible for source water protection measures and water quality.  A rate study is being performed by FCS under a separate contract with the City. The rate study will inform the financial analysis performed by FCS as part of the WSP.  The following is a list of WSP elements that will be provided by the City: o Data described in Task 2 o WSP Appendices:  Water Service Area Agreements  Interlocal & Wholesale Water Agreements  Water Rights Certifications and Documentation  City policies and agreements  SEPA checklist and DNS  Emergency Response Plan  Coliform Monitoring Plans  Lead and Copper Monitoring Plans  Disinfection Byproducts Monitoring Plans  Water Facilities Inventory  Water Use Efficiency Program adoption resolution  Water Use Efficiency Reports  WSP Consistency Review Forms  WSP public meeting minutes  WSP approval resolution Item 8.2 Packet pg. 120/223 Consor • February 2026 • City of Edmonds Update of Water System Plan • 3  Cross Connection Control Plan and several recent Annual Summary Reports  Water Quality Reports  Water Cost of Service and Rate Study  Customer Confidence Reports  Water Quality Monitoring Schedule  Emergency Water Supply Master Plan Scope of Services The Scope of Services defined herein will consist of the following major tasks:  Task 1: Project Management and Coordination  Task 2: Data Collection  Task 3: Description of Water System  Task 4: Basic Planning Data  Task 5: System Analysis and Asset Management  Task 6: Water Use Efficiency Program  Task 7: Operations and Maintenance Program  Task 8: Design and Construction Standards  Task 9: Capital Improvement Program  Task 10: Financial Analysis (FCS)  Task 11: Compile and Finalize Water System Plan  Task 12: Management Reserve Task 1 - Project Management and Coordination Objective Provide overall leadership and team strategic guidance aligned with City objectives. Coordinate, monitor, and control the project resources to meet the technical, communication, and contractual obligations required for developing and implementing the project scope. Activities Subtask 1.1 Monthly Progress Reports and Invoices Prepare and submit electronic monthly invoice for review and approval by the City. Each invoice will include the following information.  Project name, City PM name, and City contract and project numbers  Billing period (start and end date) included in the invoice and date of invoice submittal  Description of work accomplished in each contract task for the billing period  Name, billing rate, and hours for each resource that worked on each task  Updated list of potential out-of-scope work items for change log. (Potential out of scope work items should be discussed and agreed upon by the City PM in writing prior to the work being completed and invoiced. Identified change log requests should be resolved by the following invoice).  Updated list of potential changes to project schedule and plan to recover the baseline schedule if slippage has occurred  Copies of receipts for direct cost items Item 8.2 Packet pg. 121/223 Consor • February 2026 • City of Edmonds Update of Water System Plan • 4 When project goals and objectives refinement cause changes to the project work that cannot be completed within the project schedule and/or budget, Consor will request schedule changes and/or budget amendments from the City that are necessary to complete the work. Subtask 1.2 Kick-Off Meeting Prepare for, attend, and lead the kick-off meeting to officially start the project. The kick-off meeting intent is to introduce the project team, establish project objectives, review consultant and City communication protocol, discuss the project scope, and examine the project schedule. Subtask 1.3 Coordination with the Owner Report on the status of project work activities, data needs, and issues requiring City input. Bi-weekly project status emails (two per month) or phone calls (two per month) to City Project Manager to report status of project work activities, data needs, and issues requiring City input, and notes on potential schedule delay. Subtask 1.4 Staff Management Manage project staff in alignment with the scope of services, fee estimate, and schedule. Subtask 1.5 Project Management Plan Prepare a Project Management Plan (PMP) that includes a description of the problem statement, scope of work, project team member roles and responsibilities, communications protocols, quality management plan and activities, risk register from the task below, schedule from the task below, scope of consultant services, and project budget. Subtask 1.6 Project Schedule Prepare the project schedule. The schedule will include key tasks, milestones, deliverables, and City and Agency review periods. Subtask 1.7 Risk Register Prepare the project risk register to identify, assess, and track potential risks that could impact the project. Subtask 1.8 Quality Management Plan Develop and submit a Quality Management Plan for this project, as part of the Project Management Plan. This will be the basis for the consultant’s in-house Quality Management reviews of deliverables. Subtask 1.9 Quality Management Perform quality management at key milestones and on project deliverables. Subtask 1.10 Coordination with DOH Prepare for and attend the pre-plan meeting hosted by DOH. The pre-plan meeting content is to confirm regulatory requirements and WSP components. Attend virtual check-ins and coordinate with DOH throughout WSP development leading up to WSP approval. Develop the completed pre-plan checklist for each WSP submittal to DOH. City Responsibilities  Timely review and processing of consultant invoices Item 8.2 Packet pg. 122/223 Consor • February 2026 • City of Edmonds Update of Water System Plan • 5  Project team contact information  Review of Consultant prepared project PMP  Kick-off meeting coordination, setup, and virtual hosting  Review of meeting agenda and meeting summary Deliverables  Up to 16 monthly invoices delivered electronically to the City’s project manager, including: o Work on the project performed during the previous month. o Work anticipated for next invoice period. o Potential schedule and budget impacts.  Kick-off meeting agenda and summary  DOH pre-plan meeting agenda and summary  PowerPoint presentations for public meetings  PMP  Initial project schedule and one updated project schedule (PDF format)  Initial risk register (PDF format)  QA/QC plan for the project Assumptions  Project duration will be 16 months; therefore, it is assumed that there will be up to 16 invoices/status reports.  Consor assumes 16 monthly virtual meetings with the Consor PM and the City’s PM.  The project schedule will be updated to reflect the actual Notice to Proceed.  Kick-off meeting will be held virtually for up to two hours with three Consor staff in attendance.  Pre-plan meeting will be scheduled virtually by DOH for up to two hours with three Consor staff in attendance.  No public meetings will be prepared for or attended by Consor. Task 2 – Data Collection Objective Request, obtain, and review information on the City’s water system needed for the system assessment and WSP update. Item 8.2 Packet pg. 123/223 Consor • February 2026 • City of Edmonds Update of Water System Plan • 6 Activities Subtask 2.1 Data Collection and Review Develop and submit a formal data request within 15 days of Notice to Proceed for information required to complete the WSP update. This data request is anticipated to include the data required to complete the WSP. Develop and submit additional requests for specific data required during development of the WSP. City Responsibilities  City to provide requested data to Consor within 30 working days of the request. Deliverables  Formal data request(s), electronic format. Data request will include dates data is needed by for City to prioritize data collection efforts. Assumptions  Data requested, at a minimum, includes: o Retail and future service area boundaries including ordinances/agreements delineating boundaries o Intertie agreements o Water system and City GIS data, including asset age documentation and any asset inventory updates since the 2017 Comprehensive Water Plan o List of current PRV pressure setpoints o Intertie and PRV station Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) o Water billing records (previous 6 years) o Water production records, i.e. water purchased from AWWD and SPU (previous 6 years) o Maximum day production volume (each of previous 6 years) o Summary of water quality sampling results (previous 6 years) and map of sampling locations o Current fire flow requirements by zoning designation/classification o Summary of customer complaint process o Meter information, i.e. type, read frequency, calibration frequency, maintenance/replacement schedule & costs o Current water system design and construction standards o Completed CIP or other water system improvement projects since previous WSP including pertinent record drawings and design information o Population projections by traffic analysis zone (TAZ) from City’s Comprehensive Plan. o Current City Utilities’ Department organizational chart o Related plans for City and adjacent local agencies including City Comprehensive Plan, Emergency Response Plans, and Emergency Water Supply Plan.  Up to five additional requests for data included. Task 3 – Description of Water System Objective Develop a description of the City’s water system. Item 8.2 Packet pg. 124/223 Consor • February 2026 • City of Edmonds Update of Water System Plan • 7 Activities Subtask 3.1 – Develop Draft Chapter(s) Develop draft chapter(s). The chapter(s) will include a summary of the water system ownership and management, history and background, service area maps, system policies, related plans, watershed and local government consistency, and a Duty to Serve statement. City Responsibilities  Review of draft chapter(s) and consolidated comments. Deliverables  Draft chapter(s) of the WSP in electronic format for City review. Assumptions  Comments provided by the City on the draft chapter(s) will be addressed and incorporated into the WSP draft prepared under Task 11.  Work completed under Task 3 will be included in Chapters 1, 2, 3, and 5 Task 4 – Basic Planning Data Objective Develop water demand projections using future population projections completed in the hydraulic model update that will serve as the basis of the system assessments for the WSP. Activities Subtask 4.1 – Develop Water Use Characterization and Demand Projections Summarize population by TAZ for the 10-year, 20-year projections, defined in the recently completed hydraulic model update. Calculate and summarize seasonal and annual water usage characteristics by customer type. Develop graphs illustrating existing and historic diurnal patterns for water usage by customer type. Develop a table summarizing the previous three years of distribution system leakage (DSL). Subtask 4.2 – Develop Draft Chapter(s) Develop draft chapter(s). The chapter(s) will include a summary of historical water system data including population, water usage characteristics, supply, DSL, and future population and demand projections. City Responsibilities  Review of draft chapter(s) and consolidated comments. Deliverables  Draft chapter(s) of the WSP in electronic format for City review. Item 8.2 Packet pg. 125/223 Consor • February 2026 • City of Edmonds Update of Water System Plan • 8 Assumptions  Historic population and demands from the December 2025 completed hydraulic model update will be used. These will not be revised.  City will provide the previous six years of customer billing records and the previous six years of supply records in Excel format. Production records will include monthly totalized values.  Peak hour demand will be calculated using Equation 3-1 in DOH’s Water System Design Manual (WSDM).  Comments provided by the City on the draft chapter will be addressed and incorporated into the WSP draft prepared under Task 11.  Work completed under Task 4 will be included in Chapters 3 and 4 Task 5 –System Analysis and Asset Management Objective Perform an analysis of the major components of the City’s water system including supply, booster stations, reservoirs, and distribution system capacities. Evaluate the City’s compliance with current and proposed water quality regulations. Identify deficiencies and improvements associated with system capacity and asset management renewal/replacement needs for the 20-year planning period. Activities Subtask 5.1 – Review Evaluation Criteria Identify and summarize the evaluation criteria applicable to the City’s system. Subtask 5.2 – System Inventory and Asset Management Provide an inventory of the water system facilities, including a description, analysis of the condition, and criticality of each facility. The facilities analyzed will include the City’s storage and distribution system. The condition analysis will document each asset’s estimated age, general condition, and estimated remaining life expectancy. Develop criticality rankings and apply to all system assets. A summary of the City’s current asset management process will be documented. Subtask 5.3 – Water Supply, Storage, and Pumping Analysis Evaluate water supply, storage, and distribution system pumping capacities compared to existing, 10-year, and 20-year demands for each pressure zone. Evaluate peak hour demand and maximum day demand plus fire flow compared with supply capacity during a power failure (backup power analysis). Calculate requirements for storage components including operational, equalizing, standby, fire suppression, and dead storage. Develop a spreadsheet summarizing the results of the capacity analyses. Subtask 5.4 – Water Quality and Regulations Update water quality and regulations sections from the previous WSP. Summarize known future regulations. Review and summarize City historic water quality sampling data, ongoing sampling requirements, and action items for regulatory compliance. Item 8.2 Packet pg. 126/223 Consor • February 2026 • City of Edmonds Update of Water System Plan • 9 Subtask 5.5 – Identification of Improvements Identify improvement projects addressing new deficiencies that were not identified in the previous WSP. Modeling scenarios included: Low Demand Scenario • Average Day Demand (ADD) • Maximum Day Demand (MDD) with Fire Flow • Peak Hour Demand (PHD) High Demand Scenario • ADD • MDD with Fire Flow • PHD Evaluate improvement project effectiveness at addressing each respective deficiency. Subtask 5.6 – System Analysis Workshop Prepare for and lead the System Analysis Workshop. Subtask 5.7 – Develop Draft Chapter(s) Update the hydraulic profile for the City’s water system. Summarize the results of the system analysis and the City’s current Asset Management program in the draft chapter(s). The chapter(s) will include a summary of existing water system facilities, analysis evaluation criteria, results of the system analysis, system deficiencies, the City’s Asset Management program, and a summary of water quality and regulations. City Responsibilities  Review of draft chapter(s) and provide consolidated comments.  Provide documentation related to asset condition.  Attendance at System Analysis workshop. Deliverables  Document summarizing the evaluation criteria will be provided to the City in electronic format.  Spreadsheet summarizing the results of the capacity analyses  System Analysis Workshop agenda and summary.  Updated hydraulic profile  Draft chapter(s) of the WSP in electronic format for City review. Item 8.2 Packet pg. 127/223 Consor • February 2026 • City of Edmonds Update of Water System Plan • 10 Assumptions  The evaluation criteria will be based on the WAC requirements described in the DOH guidebook, or if desired, a more conservative criterion as requested by the City. The criteria will be the basis of the system analysis.  The City will provide data regarding updates to asset inventory that have occurred since the 2017 Comprehensive Water Plan, including condition and criticality. If no prior work on asset criticality exists, Consor will develop criticality ranking and perform a desktop analysis. Data will also include list of planned rehabilitation and replacement projects for the planning period.  Pipe criticality will be determined by diameter. PRV criticality will be determined by redundancy.  City will provide documentation related to the condition of the system assets. Consor will perform a desktop condition analysis, no in-person field assessments will be completed. Chapter 2 will include a summary of the data.  A virtual System Analysis Workshop of up to four hours duration for three Consor staff will be attended with City staff to discuss the results of the system analysis and preliminary solutions.  One system asset improvement will be evaluated for each of up to 10 additional system condition or capacity deficiencies not addressed in the previous WSP. Definition of improvements for new deficiencies will be performed up to the budgeted amount of 90 hours.  Comments provided by the City on the draft chapter will be addressed and incorporated into the WSP draft prepared under Task 11.  Water system model is updated and calibrated.  Work completed under Task 5 shall be included in Chapter 2, 6, 8, and 9. Task 6 – Water Use Efficiency Program Objective Develop an update to the City’s Water Use Efficiency (WUE) Program including definition of a new goal if needed and measures to meet the goal. Activities Subtask 6.1 – Water Use Efficiency Program Calculate the distribution system leakage (DSL) for the previous three years. Define water savings measures for the planning period. Calculate demand forecast inclusive of projected water savings resulting from the WUE Program. Prepare materials for public forum for WUE goal establishment. Subtask 6.2 – Develop Draft Chapter(s) Develop draft chapter(s). The chapter(s) will include a summary of the City’s metering, historic DSL, the WUE Program goal and measures, and demand forecast inclusive of projected water use efficiency savings. Item 8.2 Packet pg. 128/223 Consor • February 2026 • City of Edmonds Update of Water System Plan • 11 City Responsibilities  Review of draft chapter(s) and provide consolidated comments.  Provide WUE Reports from the last five to seven years. Deliverables  Draft chapter(s) of the WSP in electronic format for City review. Assumptions  DSL is less than 10% for the previous three years (Water Loss Control Action Plan not required).  City to provide WUE goal for the planning period.  Comments provided by the City on the draft chapter will be addressed and incorporated into the WSP draft prepared under Task 11.  Work completed under Task 6 shall be included in Chapter 4. Task 7 – Operations and Maintenance Program Objective Develop a draft Chapter 7 summarizing the City’s Operations and Maintenance (O&M) of its water system. Activities Subtask 7.1 – Develop Draft Chapter 7 Develop draft Chapter 7. The chapter to include a summary of the City’s water department organization and personnel, O&M procedures and preventative maintenance measures, water quality monitoring procedures, emergency response planning and measures, Cross-Connection Control Program, Watermain Condition Assessment Program, most recent sanitary survey findings, a summary of the water system recordkeeping, reporting, and customer complaint program, and a list of O&M deficiencies. City Responsibilities  Review of draft Chapter 7 and provide consolidated comments. Deliverables  Draft Chapter 7 of the WSP in electronic format for City review. Assumptions  City to provide list of known O&M deficiencies.  O&M benchmarking is not included.  Emergency response section to include summary of measures defined in the City’s Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan (CEMP) for consistency. Item 8.2 Packet pg. 129/223 Consor • February 2026 • City of Edmonds Update of Water System Plan • 12  Comments provided by the City on the draft chapter will be addressed and incorporated into the WSP draft prepared under Task 11. Task 8 – Design and Construction Standards Objective Develop draft chapter(s) summarizing the City’s design and construction standards to allow the City to opt for the project report and construction document submittal exception with DOH for distribution main or distribution-related projects. Activities Subtask 8.1 – Develop Draft Chapter(s) Develop draft chapter(s). Chapter to include a summary of the City’s internal process for reviewing project reports and construction documents, policies and requirements for outside parties, current design and construction standards, and a description of the construction certification process. City Responsibilities  Review of draft chapter(s) and provide consolidated comments. Deliverables  Draft chapter(s) of the WSP in electronic format for City review. Assumptions  City’s current water system design and construction standards are available on the City website. A link to the standards will be provided in this section. Full standards document will not be included in this WSP.  Update to the City’s water system design and construction standards is excluded from this Scope of Services.  Comments provided by the City will be addressed and incorporated into the WSP draft prepared under Task 11.  Work completed under Task 8 shall be included in Chapter 5. Task 9 – Capital Improvement Program Objective Develop a list of new Capital Improvement Program (CIP) projects and programs that are not currently documented in the City’s CIP for the 10- and 20-year planning horizons including a prioritized list of system capacity, Asset Management, O&M, and regulatory improvement programs. Item 8.2 Packet pg. 130/223 Consor • February 2026 • City of Edmonds Update of Water System Plan • 13 Activities Subtask 9.1 – Development of CIP Project Costs Improvements identified in the 2017 Water Comprehensive Plan will be reviewed and identified as completed or not. The City’s CIP will be updated to carry forward improvements previously identified but not completed. Based on the recommendations from Chapter 3, a list of up to 30 new CIP projects and programs will be generated for the 10- and 20-year planning horizons. Costs for pipelines, pump stations, and storage tanks will be developed for generating project specific planning level (AACE International Class 10 Estimate) project cost opinions, presented as cost per linear foot with multipliers. Develop project cost opinions for each improvement project. Update existing CIP costs provided by City to present dollars. Coordinate with City staff to establish criteria for prioritizing and scheduling improvements. Subtask 9.2 – CIP Workshop Prepare for and conduct a workshop to review the new CIP projects and coordinate prioritization with the City’s current biennial CIP budget. Subtask 9.3 – Develop Draft Chapter(s) Develop draft chapter(s). The chapter(s) include a summary of the unit and project cost assumptions, the list of new CIP projects and cost opinions, and a summary of the City’s current CIP including program descriptions. City Responsibilities  Review of draft chapter(s) and provide consolidated comments.  Attendance at CIP workshop. Deliverables  Draft chapter(s) of the WSP in electronic format for City review.  CIP Workshop agenda and summary. Assumptions  City to provide current CIP cost opinions and project descriptions. Cost opinions to be updated using Engineering News-Record (ENR) historical indices.  Up to 30 CIP projects will be developed.  10- and 20-year prioritized CIP list to be included in Chapter 9. The City’s most recent biennial CIP budget and the 2017 Water Comprehensive Plan prepared outside of this scope of work will serve as the basis for the 10-year CIP, with up to 30 new projects or programs being added to incomplete projects from the existing CIP based upon the results of the system analysis work for the WSP.  A virtual CIP Workshop of up to four hours duration for two Consor staff. Item 8.2 Packet pg. 131/223 Consor • February 2026 • City of Edmonds Update of Water System Plan • 14  Comments provided by the City on the draft chapter will be addressed and incorporated into the WSP draft prepared under Task 11.  Work completed under Task 9 shall be included in Chapter 9. Task 10 – Financial Analysis Objective Task 10 financial analysis to be performed by sub-consultant, FCS. Activities Subtask 10.1 Project Initiation and Data Collection FCS will provide a data request outlining information needed to complete the analysis, reviewing data provided and working with the project team to resolve questions and obtain additional records as needed. Subtask 10.1 includes the administrative efforts involved with project initiation and ongoing management. Subtask 10.2 Financial Plan This task includes the development of a forecast of revenue requirements for the City’s water utility over a ten-year planning period. Key elements of this task include:  Operating Forecast. Initially based on the City’s budget, the forecast of operating revenues and expenses will incorporate inflation and other cost increases as appropriate. The operating forecast will also incorporate adjustments for anticipated changes in staffing and/or program activities.  Capital Funding Plan. FCS will develop a funding plan that supports the completion of the planned capital projects through a mix of rate revenues, GFCs, developer contributions, existing reserves, and debt (if needed).  Revenue Sufficiency Analysis. The revenue sufficiency analysis will evaluate the adequacy of the water utility’s revenues in meeting its cash flow needs and applicable debt service coverage requirements, developing a ten-year strategy of annual rate adjustments. Subtask 10.3 Documentation Subtask 10.3 consists of efforts related to preparing the financial chapter of the WSP:  Reviewing the water utility’s historical financial performance, summarizing noteworthy trends.  Discussing potential funding sources for the CIP.  Documenting the financial plan completed in Subtask 10.2.  Evaluating the affordability of the City’s current and proposed rates. For consistency with standards historically established by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, FCS will compute sample residential bills under the City's current and projected water and sewer rates as a percent of median household income. Recognizing that median household income is of limited value in assessing the impacts of utility rates on customers with income levels far below the area median, we will also determine values for two alternative metrics that have been gaining traction in the industry as providing a more meaningful basis for evaluating affordability: Item 8.2 Packet pg. 132/223 Consor • February 2026 • City of Edmonds Update of Water System Plan • 15 o Hours at Minimum Wage (HM): This metric computes the average monthly bill for a home using 50 gallons per capita per day (gpcd) in terms of the number of hours someone earning the prevailing local minimum wage would need to work in order to pay it. o Affordability Ratio at the 20th Income Percentile (AR20): This metric computes the average monthly bill for a home using 50 gpcd as a percentage of the net disposable income that a household in the 20th income percentile would have after paying for other essential costs including housing, food, healthcare, home energy, and taxes. Submit a draft financial chapter to the City for review, revising it to incorporate input received. Subtask 10.4 Meetings and Public Process FCS will attend up to three virtual review meetings with the project team and up to two onsite City Council meetings to present study findings and recommendations. City Responsibilities  Review of draft Chapter 10 and provide consolidated comments. Deliverables  Draft Chapter 10 of the WSP in electronic format for City review. Assumptions  Comments provided by the City on the draft chapter will be addressed and incorporated into the WSP draft prepared under Task 11.  No rate study to be performed under this Scope of Services. Rate study performed under separate contract with the City. Task 11 – Compile and Finalize Water System Plan Objective Compile the draft WSP for City review and address City comments. Develop a revised draft WSP for DOH review and address regulatory review comments. Provide the final signed WSP to the City. Activities Subtask 11.1 – Develop Executive Summary and Draft WSP Develop responses to City review comments and develop updates to the WSP. Revise draft chapters developed under prior chapters to address City comments and compile into an overall draft WSP. Develop an Executive Summary summarizing each of the WSP chapters.  Compile and organize WSP Appendices. The City will prepare and provide Consor with the following Appendices: o Water Service Area Agreements o Interlocal & Wholesale Water Agreements Item 8.2 Packet pg. 133/223 Consor • February 2026 • City of Edmonds Update of Water System Plan • 16 o Water Rights Certifications and Documentation o City policies and agreements o SEPA checklist and DNS o Emergency Response Plan o Coliform Monitoring Plans o Water Use Efficiency Program adoption resolution o WSP Consistency Review Forms o WSP public meeting minutes o WSP approval resolution o Cross Connection Control Plan and Water Quality Reports o Water Cost of Service and Rate Study o Customer Confidence Reports o Water Quality Monitoring Plan o Water System Asset Management Plan Prepare WSP cover, TOC, list of figures, list of tables, list of appendices and list of acronyms and abbreviations. Develop a combined draft WSP for City review. Subtask 11.2 – Prepare Draft WSP for Adjacent Agency Review Develop responses to City review comments on the overall draft WSP and develop updates to the WSP. Prepare draft WSP for initial submittal to adjacent agencies. Compile local government consistency checklists in Appendix. Prepare draft WSP for regulatory review. Subtask 11.3 – Develop Draft WSP for DOH and Address Comments Submit the draft WSP to DOH for regulatory review. Address DOH review comments on the draft WSP and develop a comment response form. Submit revised draft WSP to City for public review and comment. Subtask 11.4 – Develop Final WSP Prepare revised WSP that incorporates final City (staff and board) and public comments. Submit signed WSP to DOH for approval. Submit final signed WSP including approval letter from DOH to the City for adoption. City Responsibilities  Review of Draft WSP and provide consolidated comments.  Prepare the SEPA checklist and complete the Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) process. Deliverables  Draft compiled WSP for City review in electronic format.  Responses to City comments in electronic format.  Draft compiled WSP for DOH review in electronic format, first submittal.  Responses to DOH review comments in electronic format. Item 8.2 Packet pg. 134/223 Consor • February 2026 • City of Edmonds Update of Water System Plan • 17  Draft WSP for DOH approval in electronic format.  Final WSP in electronic format. Assumptions  The updated SEPA and DNS will be provided to Consor.  The City will facilitate the WSP Consistency Review process with interlocal agencies and provide the Consistency Review forms to Consor.  City reviews of the combined WSP are limited to two total.  Review period for the first combined draft submittal by the City has been scheduled to take no more than 20 working days.  There will be one round of review comments provided by DOH.  Review period for each draft WSP submittal to DOH has been scheduled to take up to 90 calendar days. DOH to facilitate Department of Ecology review during this time.  Hard copies of draft and final WSP not included. Task 12 – Management Reserve Objective Unanticipated services authorized under this task are at the City’s discretion. Consor will provide scope and fee estimate for additional services when requested by the City and will commence work only when written authorization is provided by the City. Budget The fee estimate for the project is provided as Exhibit B. Services will be performed on a time and expense basis with a total not to exceed amount as shown on the Estimate. Project Schedule The preliminary project schedule is provided below. A more detailed project schedule will be developed after Notice to Proceed is provided by the City. The WSP is anticipated to be substantively completed over a period of approximately 16 months, however agency review may extend the project beyond that timeframe. The effort is anticipated to begin in March 2026 upon receipt of Notice to Proceed (NTP). Consor will make every effort to complete the work in a timely manner; however, Consor cannot be responsible for factors beyond our control, nor by factors that could not reasonably have been foreseen at the time this scope was executed. Activity Estimated Completion Notice to Proceed March 2026 Data Collection March – May 2026 System Analysis May – July 2026 Draft Chapter Development and Review May – December 2026 Item 8.2 Packet pg. 135/223 Consor • February 2026 • City of Edmonds Update of Water System Plan • 18 Compile Draft WSP December 2026 Agency Reviews, WSP Revisions, and City Council Approval January – March 2027 Final WSP Submitted to DOH June 2027 Attachments  Exhibit B – Fee Estimate Item 8.2 Packet pg. 136/223 WATER SYSTEM PLAN UPDATE CITY OF EDMONDS PROPOSED FEE ESTIMATE LABOR CLASSIFICATION (HOURS) Principal Engineer VI Professional Engineer VIII Professional Engineer VII Engineering Designer IV Engineering Designer II Administrative II Cost Estimator III Technician IV Project Coordinator IV Hours Labor FCS Subconsultant Multiplier % Markup Subconsultant Total with Markup Expenses CADD Units $18/hr GIS Units $10/hr Total Task 1 - Project Management and Coordination Task 1.1 - Progress Report and Invoices 10 16 16 32 74 15,221$ 1.1 -$ -$ -$ -$ 15,221$ Task 1.2 - Kick-Off Meeting 2 4 3 8 17 4,419$ 1.1 -$ -$ -$ 30$ 4,449$ Task 1.3 - Coordination with the Owner 32 32 8,817$ 1.1 -$ -$ -$ -$ 8,817$ Task 1.4 - Staff Management 32 32 8,817$ 1.1 -$ -$ -$ -$ 8,817$ Task 1.5 - Project Management Plan 1 2 8 11 2,683$ 1.1 -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,683$ Task 1.6 - Project Schedule 2 4 8 14 3,628$ 1.1 -$ -$ -$ -$ 3,628$ Task 1.7 - Risk Register 1 4 8 13 3,234$ 1.1 -$ -$ -$ -$ 3,234$ Task 1.8 - Quality Management Plan 1 2 4 7 1,814$ 1.1 -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,814$ Task 1.9 - Quality Management 80 8 4 2 94 35,197$ 1.1 -$ -$ -$ 40$ 35,237$ Task 1.10 - Coordination with DOH 10 10 20 4,928$ 1.1 -$ -$ -$ -$ 4,928$ Task 1 Subtotal 87 108 7 64 0 16 0 0 32 314 88,758$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 70$ 88,828$ Task 2 - Data Collection Task 2.1 - Data Collection and Review 5 4 38 47 10,690$ 1.1 -$ -$ -$ 40$ 10,730$ Task 2 Subtotal 0 5 4 38 0 0 0 0 0 47 10,690$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 40$ 10,730$ Task 3 - Description of Water System Task 3.1 - Develop Draft Chapter(s)4 24 4 2 34 7,413$ 1.1 -$ -$ -$ 40$ 7,453$ Task 3 Subtotal 0 4 0 24 4 2 0 0 0 34 7,413$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 40$ 7,453$ Task 4 - Basic Planning Data Task 4.1 - Develop Water Use Characterization and Demand Projections 8 20 16 20 64 14,993$ 1.1 -$ -$ -$ 400$ 15,393$ Task 4.2 - Develop Draft Chapter(s)4 10 48 10 2 74 16,477$ 1.1 -$ -$ -$ 200$ 16,677$ Task 4 Subtotal 0 12 30 64 30 2 0 0 0 138 31,470$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 600$ 32,070$ Task 5 - System Analysis and Asset Management Task 5.1 - Review Evaluation Criteria 2 4 6 1,420$ 1.1 -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,420$ Task 5.2 - System Inventory and Asset Management 6 72 12 90 19,722$ 1.1 -$ -$ -$ 120$ 19,842$ Task 5.3 - Water Supply, Storage, and Pumping Analysis 4 8 12 34 58 12,685$ 1.1 -$ -$ -$ 420$ 13,105$ Task 5.4 - Water Quality and Regulation 4 24 4 32 7,125$ 1.1 -$ -$ -$ 40$ 7,165$ Task 5.5 - Identification of Improvements 4 32 8 200 244 51,663$ 1.1 -$ -$ -$ 2,320$ 53,983$ Task 5.6 - System Analysis Workshop 10 10 14 34 8,219$ 1.1 -$ -$ -$ 240$ 8,459$ Task 5.7 - Develop Draft Chapter(s)4 8 44 16 2 32 106 23,214$ 1.1 -$ -$ 576$ 240$ 24,030$ Task 5 Subtotal 0 34 58 164 280 2 0 32 0 570 124,048$ -$ -$ -$ 576$ 3,380$ 128,004$ Task 6 - Water Use Efficiency Program Task 6.1 - Water Use Efficiency Program 10 28 38 8,840$ 1.1 -$ -$ -$ -$ 8,840$ Task 6.2 - Develop Draft Chapter(s)4 20 2 26 5,737$ 1.1 -$ -$ -$ -$ 5,737$ Task 6 Subtotal 0 14 0 48 0 2 0 0 0 64 14,576$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 14,576$ Task 7 - Operations and Maintenance Program Task 7.1 - Develop Draft Chapter 7 8 84 2 94 20,746$ 1.1 -$ -$ -$ -$ 20,746$ Task 7 Subtotal 0 8 0 84 0 2 0 0 0 94 20,746$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 20,746$ Task 8 - Design and Construction Standards Task 8.1 - Develop Draft Chapter(s)8 24 2 34 7,708$ 1.1 -$ -$ -$ -$ 7,708$ Task 8 Subtotal 0 8 0 24 0 2 0 0 0 34 7,708$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 7,708$ Task 9 - Capital Improvement Program Task 9.1 - Development of CIP Project Costs 16 80 12 108 25,873$ 1.1 -$ -$ -$ -$ 25,873$ Task 9.2 - CIP Workshop 6 16 22 5,130$ 1.1 -$ -$ -$ -$ 5,130$ Task 9.3 - Develop Draft Chapter(s)6 28 2 36 8,026$ 1.1 -$ -$ -$ -$ 8,026$ Task 9 Subtotal 0 28 0 124 0 2 12 0 0 166 39,029$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 39,029$ Task 10 - Financial Analysis Task 10.1 - Project Initiation and Data Collection 0 -$ 2,990$ 1.1 3,289$ -$ -$ -$ 3,289$ Task 10.2 - Financial Plan 0 -$ 12,090$ 1.1 13,299$ -$ -$ -$ 13,299$ Task 10.3 - Documentation 4 20 24 5,448$ 8,250$ 1.1 9,075$ -$ -$ -$ 14,523$ Task 10.4 - Meetings and Public Process 0 -$ 12,340$ 1.1 13,574$ -$ -$ -$ 13,574$ Task 10 Subtotal 0 4 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 24 5,448$ 35,670$ 39,237$ -$ -$ -$ 44,685$ Task 11 - Compile and Finalize Water System Paln Task 11.1 - Develop Executive Summary and Draft WSP 12 4 80 24 24 144 30,052$ 1.1 -$ -$ -$ 280$ 30,332$ Task 11.2 - Prepare Draft WSP for Adjacent Agency Review 4 16 2 22 4,867$ 1.1 -$ -$ -$ -$ 4,867$ Task 11.3 - Develop Draft WSP for DOH and Address Comments 45 140 8 4 197 45,013$ 1.1 -$ -$ -$ 80$ 45,093$ Task 11.4 - Develop Final WSP 16 40 24 80 16,562$ 1.1 -$ -$ -$ -$ 16,562$ Task 11 Subtotal 0 77 4 276 32 54 0 0 0 443 96,494$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 360$ 96,854$ Task 12 - Management Reserve Task 12.1 - Management Reserve 0 -$ 1.1 -$ 45,000$ -$ -$ 45,000$ Task 12 Subtotal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -$ -$ -$ 45,000$ -$ -$ 45,000$ TOTAL - ALL TASKS 87 302 103 930 346 84 12 32 32 1928 446,381$ 35,670$ 39,237$ 45,000$ 576$ 4,490$ 535,684$ Subconsultants City of Edmonds February 2026 https://us-partner-integrations.egnyte.com/msoffice/wopi/files/a6a33d4b-57ed-40a4-8c7f-4d40ea958e6b/WOPIServiceId_TP_EGNYTE_PLUS/WOPIUserId_-/WSP Fee Estimate Draft_Edmonds.xlsx Consor Water System Plan Update Page 1 Attachment B Item 8.2 Packet pg. 137/223 Personnel: Billing Classifications 2026 Rates Billing Classifications 2026 Rates Principal Engineer VI $384 Construction Manager X $340 Principal Engineer V $362 Construction Manager IX $316 Principal Engineer IV $342 Construction Manager VIII $299 Principal Engineer III $322 Construction Manager VII $287 Principal Engineer II $304 Construction Manager VI $267 Principal Engineer I $288 Construction Manager V $246 Professional Engineer IX $278 Construction Manager IV $234 Engineering Designer IX $273 Construction Manager III $213 Professional Engineer VIII $269 Construction Manager II $197 Engineering Designer VIII $261 Construction Manager I $167 Professional Engineer VII $257 Construction Coordinator V $228 Engineering Designer VII $248 Construction Coordinator IV $206 Professional Engineer VI $245 Construction Coordinator III $191 Engineering Designer VI $236 Construction Coordinator II $169 Professional Engineer V $232 Construction Coordinator I $153 Engineering Designer V $224 Construction Admin Specialist IV $201 Professional Engineer IV $218 Construction Admin Specialist III $183 Engineering Designer IV $212 Construction Admin Specialist II $159 Professional Engineer III $211 Construction Admin Specialist I $140 Engineering Designer III $209 Inspector VII $246 Engineering Designer II $197 Inspector VI $228 Engineering Designer I $183 Inspector V $206 Principal III $390 Inspector IV $191 Principal II $349 Inspector III $169 Principal I $310 Inspector II $153 Project Manager V $304 Inspector I $132 Project Manager IV $299 Technician IV $211 Project Manager III $280 Technician III $192 Project Manager II $249 Technician II $167 Project Manager I $218 Technician I $147 Cost Estimator III $332 Project Coordinator IV $204 Cost Estimator II $269 Project Coordinator III $185 Cost Estimator I $204 Project Coordinator II $167 Quality Control Compliance Specialist $210 Project Coordinator I $153 Climate Scientist VI $307 Administrative III $153 Climate Scientist V $270 Administrative II $141 Climate Scientist IV $244 Administrative I $126 Climate Scientist III $217 Climate Scientist II $200 Climate Scientist I $169 Project Expenses: CADD Hardware/Software $18.00/hour Modeling and GIS Hardware/Software $10.00/hour Mileage Current IRS Rate Postage and Delivery Services At Cost Printing and Reproduction At Cost Travel, Lodging, and Subsistence At Cost Outside Services: 2026 SCHEDULE OF CHARGES Labor will be invoiced by staff classification at the following hourly rates, which are valid from January 1, 2026 through December 31, 2026. After this period, the rates are subject to adjustment. Expenses incurred that are directly attributable to the project will be invoiced at actual cost. These expenses include the following: Outside technical, professional, and other services will be invoiced at actual cost-plus 10 percent to cover administration and overhead. 2026 Puget Sound/CA Confidential Item 8.2 Packet pg. 138/223 City Council Agenda Item 8.3 February 24, 2026 - Regular Meeting TITLE:Approval of claim checks and wire payments. (First Reading) DEPARTMENT:Finance PRESENTER:Richard Gould NEEDED FROM COUNCIL:Action RECOMMENDATION:Approval of claim checks and wire payments. BUDGET: Total Dollar Amount:$1,102,385.84 ☒ Approved in Budget Fund(s):Various ☐ Budget Reallocation Required ☐ No Budget Impact PROBLEM/ISSUE STATEMENT: Approval of claim checks #280495 – #280553 dated February 10, 2026 for $367,540.92, checks #280554 –  #280608 dated February 12, 2026 for $145,746.48, checks #280609 – #280698 dated February 18, 2026 for $550,104.92 and wire payments of $1,783.79, $568.79, $13,486.42 & $23,154.52. CONTEXT, ANALYSIS, & ALTERNATIVES: The Council President shall be designated as the auditing committee for the city council. The council president shall review the documentation supporting claims paid and review for approval by the city council at its next regular public meeting all checks or warrants issued in payment of any claim, demand or voucher. A list of each claim, demand or voucher approved and each check or warrant issued indicating the check or warrant number, the amount paid and the vendor or payee shall be filed in the city council office for review by individual councilmembers prior to each regularly scheduled public meeting. RECOMMENDATION: Approval of claim checks and wire payments. BUDGET IMPACTS: $1,102,385.84 ITEM HISTORY: N/A ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: ATTACHMENTS: Attachment #1 – Claim checks dated February 10, 2026 Attachment #2 –  Claim checks dated February 12, 2026 Attachment #3 – Claim checks dated February 18, 2026 Item 8.3 Packet pg. 139/223 Item 8.3 Packet pg. 140/223 Item 8.3 Packet pg. 141/223 Item 8.3 Packet pg. 142/223 Item 8.3 Packet pg. 143/223 Item 8.3 Packet pg. 144/223 Item 8.3 Packet pg. 145/223 Item 8.3 Packet pg. 146/223 Item 8.3 Packet pg. 147/223 Item 8.3 Packet pg. 148/223 Item 8.3 Packet pg. 149/223 Item 8.3 Packet pg. 150/223 Item 8.3 Packet pg. 151/223 Item 8.3 Packet pg. 152/223 Item 8.3 Packet pg. 153/223 Item 8.3 Packet pg. 154/223 Item 8.3 Packet pg. 155/223 Item 8.3 Packet pg. 156/223 Item 8.3 Packet pg. 157/223 Item 8.3 Packet pg. 158/223 Item 8.3 Packet pg. 159/223 Item 8.3 Packet pg. 160/223 Item 8.3 Packet pg. 161/223 Item 8.3 Packet pg. 162/223 Item 8.3 Packet pg. 163/223 Item 8.3 Packet pg. 164/223 Item 8.3 Packet pg. 165/223 Item 8.3 Packet pg. 166/223 Item 8.3 Packet pg. 167/223 Item 8.3 Packet pg. 168/223 Item 8.3 Packet pg. 169/223 Item 8.3 Packet pg. 170/223 Item 8.3 Packet pg. 171/223 City Council Agenda Item 8.4 February 24, 2026 - Regular Meeting TITLE:Approval of payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire payments (Only One Reading Required) DEPARTMENT:Finance PRESENTER:Richard Gould NEEDED FROM COUNCIL:Action RECOMMENDATION:Approval of payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire payments. BUDGET: Total Dollar Amount:$1,658,501.39 ☒ Approved in Budget Fund(s):various ☐ Budget Reallocation Required ☐ No Budget Impact PROBLEM/ISSUE STATEMENT: In accordance with the State statutes, City payments must be approved by the City Council. Ordinance #2896 delegates this approval to the Council President who reviews and recommends either approval or non-approval of payments. CONTEXT, ANALYSIS, & ALTERNATIVES: Approval of payroll checks #66384 through #66386 dated February 20, 2026, for $5,845.10, direct deposit for $798,547.35, benefit checks #66387 through #66394 and wire payments of $854,108.94 for the pay period of February 1, 2026 through February 15, 2026. RECOMMENDATION: Approval of payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire payments. BUDGET IMPACTS: $1,658,501.39 ITEM HISTORY: N/A ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: ATTACHMENTS: Attachment #1 – 02-01-2026 to 02-16-2026 Payroll Earnings Report Attachment #2 – 02-01-2026 to 02-16-2026 Benefit Summary Report Item 8.4 Packet pg. 172/223 Benefit Checks Summary Report City of Edmonds Pay Period: 1,199 - 02/01/2026 to 02/15/2026 Bank: usbank - US Bank Direct DepositCheck AmtNamePayee #DateCheck # 66387 02/20/2026 bpas BPAS 7,508.70 0.00 66388 02/20/2026 epoa2 EPOA-POLICE 6,762.00 0.00 66389 02/20/2026 epoa3 EPOA-POLICE SUPPORT 1,290.00 0.00 66390 02/20/2026 icma MISSIONSQUARE PLAN SERVICES 5,282.74 0.00 66391 02/20/2026 flex NAVIA BENEFIT SOLUTIONS 7,303.03 0.00 66392 02/20/2026 teamcom TEAMSTERS LOCAL 763 606.50 0.00 66393 02/20/2026 teams TEAMSTERS LOCAL 763 6,803.50 0.00 66394 02/20/2026 tx TEXAS CHILD SUPPORT SDU 634.50 0.00 36,190.97 0.00 Bank: wire - US BANK Direct DepositCheck AmtNamePayee #DateCheck # 3961 02/20/2026 awc AWC 459,549.83 0.00 3966 02/20/2026 edm CITY OF EDMONDS 325.00 0.00 3969 02/20/2026 wadc WASHINGTON STATE TREASURER 41,504.88 0.00 3970 02/20/2026 us US BANK 159,415.79 0.00 3971 02/20/2026 mebt WTRISC FBO #N3177B1 145,858.02 0.00 3973 02/20/2026 pb NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTION 10,484.45 0.00 3975 02/20/2026 oe OFFICE OF SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT 780.00 0.00 817,917.97 0.00 854,108.94 0.00Grand Totals: Page 1 of 12/19/2026 Item 8.4 Packet pg. 173/223 Payroll Earnings Summary Report City of Edmonds Pay Period: 1,199 (02/01/2026 to 02/15/2026) Hours AmountHour Type Hour Class Description NO PAY NON HIREDABSENT112 80.00 0.00 SICK LEAVESICK121 834.48 50,746.63 VACATIONVACATION122 421.75 24,616.17 HOLIDAY HOURSHOLIDAY123 115.00 6,787.69 FLOATER HOLIDAYHOLIDAY124 125.20 6,606.79 COMPENSATORY TIMECOMP HOURS125 114.52 8,090.73 Holiday Bank WWTPHOLIDAY128 36.75 2,075.24 COMPENSATORY TIMECOMP HOURS137 10.00 1,001.55 Kelly Day UsedREGULAR HOURS150 163.75 10,611.14 COMPTIME AUTO PAYCOMP HOURS155 190.00 12,849.54 SICK LEAVE PAYOFFSICK157 3.21 121.59 MANAGEMENT LEAVEVACATION160 59.00 5,395.62 REGULAR HOURSREGULAR HOURS190 15,432.40 962,386.73 ADMINISTRATIVE LEAVEREGULAR HOURS195 76.00 4,991.77 OVERTIME-STRAIGHTOVERTIME HOURS210 32.50 1,084.54 WATER WATCH STANDBYOVERTIME HOURS215 48.00 3,612.55 STANDBY TREATMENT PLANTMISCELLANEOUS216 15.00 2,201.78 OVERTIME 1.5OVERTIME HOURS220 359.00 34,460.09 OVERTIME-DOUBLEOVERTIME HOURS225 36.50 4,203.37 MISC PAYMISCELLANEOUS400 0.00 154.35 Medical Opt OutMISCELLANEOUS404 0.00 300.00 WORKING OUT OF CLASSMISCELLANEOUS410 0.00 1,723.68 SHIFT DIFFERENTIALSHIFT DIFFERENTIAL411 0.00 1,876.21 RETROACTIVE PAYRETROACTIVE PAY600 0.00 717.33 ACCRUED COMP 1.0COMP HOURS602 15.00 0.00 ACCRUED COMP TIME 1.5COMP HOURS604 297.25 0.00 Commander Standy AccrualCOMP HOURS609 10.00 0.00 ACCREDITATION PAYMISCELLANEOUSacc 0.00 198.88 ACCRED/POLICE SUPPORTMISCELLANEOUSacs 0.00 234.62 Ancilary Duty PayREGULAR HOURSanc 0.00 231.25 Ancilary Duty PayREGULAR HOURSanc2 0.00 1,725.16 Ancilary Duty PayREGULAR HOURSanc3 0.00 1,419.50 BOC II CertificationMISCELLANEOUSboc 0.00 125.70 TRAINING CORPORALMISCELLANEOUScpl 0.00 241.76 02/19/2026 Page 1 of 2 Item 8.4 Packet pg. 174/223 Payroll Earnings Summary Report City of Edmonds Pay Period: 1,199 (02/01/2026 to 02/15/2026) Hours AmountHour Type Hour Class Description CERTIFICATION III PAYMISCELLANEOUScrt 0.00 125.70 Detective 4%MISCELLANEOUSdet4 0.00 1,145.74 EDUCATION PAY 2%EDUCATION PAYed1 0.00 730.92 EDUCATION PAY 4%EDUCATION PAYed2 0.00 714.64 EDUCATION PAY 6%EDUCATION PAYed3 0.00 11,593.61 FAMILY MEDICAL/SICKSICKfmls 44.00 3,681.84 K-9 AssignmentMISCELLANEOUSk9 0.00 253.84 LANGUAGE PAYMISCELLANEOUSlan 0.00 950.00 LONGEVITY PAY 2%LONGEVITYlg1 0.00 1,197.46 LONGEVITY PAY 2.5%LONGEVITYlg11 0.00 852.93 Longevity 9%LONGEVITYlg12 0.00 2,696.50 Longevity 7%LONGEVITYlg13 0.00 1,765.52 Longevity 5%LONGEVITYlg14 0.00 1,789.56 Longevity 1.5%LONGEVITYlg16 0.00 59.86 LONGEVITY 6%LONGEVITY PAYlg3 0.00 571.44 Longevity 1%LONGEVITYlg4 0.00 1,152.84 Longevity 3%LONGEVITYlg5 0.00 4,116.43 Longevity 1.5%LONGEVITYlg7 0.00 902.79 Paid Family Medical HolidayHOLIDAYpfmh 52.00 2,883.29 Paid Family Medical Unpaid/SupABSENTpfmp 259.00 0.00 Paid FAMILY MEDICAL/SICKSICKpfms 68.00 4,627.47 Paid Family Medical VacationVACATIONpfmv 7.00 396.13 PHYSICAL FITNESS PAYMISCELLANEOUSphy 0.00 3,462.61 Special Ops SergeantMISCELLANEOUSsop 0.00 262.70 PSET SergeantMISCELLANEOUSstr 0.00 262.70 TAC OfficerMISCELLANEOUStac 0.00 231.82 Traffic Officer - CarMISCELLANEOUStraf 0.00 662.28 Vacation exceptionVACATIONvex 5.00 342.06 Total Net Pay:$804,392.45 $1,198,224.64 18,910.31 02/19/2026 Page 2 of 2 Item 8.4 Packet pg. 175/223 City Council Agenda Item 8.5 February 24, 2026 - Regular Meeting TITLE:Parks Maintenance Worker Position Conversion (Second Reading) DEPARTMENT:Parks, Recreation and Human Services PRESENTER:Angie Feser NEEDED FROM COUNCIL:Action RECOMMENDATION:To authorize the conversion of an existing Parks Maintenance Worker position to a second Parks Lead Worker position resulting in no net gain in the city’s Full Time Equivalent (FTE) count and support increased parks maintenance operations efficiencies. BUDGET: Total Dollar Amount:0 ☒ Approved in Budget Fund(s):001.00.64.576.5768010.0 00. 511000.☐ Budget Reallocation Required ☐ No Budget Impact PROBLEM/ISSUE STATEMENT: The Parks Maintenance Division organization structure consists of one Parks Manager, one Parks Lead and remaining park maintenance workers. The Parks Lead reports to the Manager and all other maintenance staff are organized in their work efforts by the Lead, which creates a poor management practice of 12 - 15 individuals receiving their daily work assignments and supervision from one staff member. In addition to a lack of computerized or automated work order assignment, all work assignment and management is conducted verbally. This structure has created a less efficient chain of command system within park maintenance operations. CONTEXT, ANALYSIS, & ALTERNATIVES: The creation of a second Parks Lead position would significantly increase chain of command, work assignment and monitoring efficiencies. The request is to convert one existing Parks Maintenance Worker (PMW) position to a second Parks Lead position. In order to NOT add to the total full time equivalent (FTE) count, the existing PMW position will be eliminated in conjunction with the creation of this second Parks Lead position. RECOMMENDATION: To authorize the conversion of an existing Parks Maintenance Worker position to a second Parks Lead Worker position resulting in no net gain in the city’s Full Time Equivalent (FTE) count and support increased parks maintenance operations efficiencies. BUDGET IMPACTS: Because the current Parks Maintenance Worker who has been identified for this new position is at Step 5 (top of range) and Parks Lead Step 1 is the same pay rate as per the Teamsters Union agreement, there will be a 5% increase in salary expenditure for this employee. The small increase in salary (approximately $420/month) is covered in 2026 by salary and benefits savings created from delayed back filling of two vacancies. Item 8.5 Packet pg. 176/223 ITEM HISTORY: This agenda item was review by the City Council Public Safety, Planning, Human Services, and Personnel (PSPHSP) Committee on February 17, 2026 and the committee agreed to have it move forward to the next available consent agenda. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: ATTACHMENTS: None Item 8.5 Packet pg. 177/223 City Council Agenda Item 9.1 February 24, 2026 - Regular Meeting TITLE:2026 Tree Code Updates, Project #AMD2025-0006 (First Reading) DEPARTMENT:Planning and Development Services PRESENTER:Deb Powers NEEDED FROM COUNCIL:Informational RECOMMENDATION:No alternatives are presented. This agenda item is informational and process-focused only. BUDGET: Total Dollar Amount:N/A ☐ Approved in Budget Fund(s):N/A ☐ Budget Reallocation Required ☒ No Budget Impact PROBLEM/ISSUE STATEMENT: This agenda item introduces a revised work plan for amendments to the tree code, Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) ECDC 17.130. Staff are not presenting draft regulations or specific policy proposals at this time. Instead, staff will outline the project scope, timeline, and engagement approach for discussion. CONTEXT, ANALYSIS, & ALTERNATIVES: Urban forests deliver essential public benefits, including mitigation of the urban heat island effect, enhanced air and water quality, effective stormwater management, and improved community health outcomes. Like many municipalities, Edmonds maintains a comprehensive framework of practices, programs, policies, plans, and regulations to guide City operations and community efforts in cultivating a healthy, sustainable urban forest. The following table summarizes key past actions and adoptions in this area. Date Policy Context July 2019 Edmonds Urban Forest Management Plan adopted to provide guidance for managing, enhancing, and growing Edmonds’ canopy. March 2021 Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) Chapter 23.10, Tree Related Regulations adopted. July 2021 RCW 76.15 enacted to encourage Washington cities, counties and tribes to manage trees and urban forests on a local level. March 2023 Edmonds 2023 Climate Action Plan adopted to identify actions towards reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 2050, including the establishment of a citywide canopy cover goal. December 2024 2024-2044 Comprehensive Plan adopted to provide policy direction for future growth and development over the next 20 years. Item 9.1 Packet pg. 178/223 April 2025 Interim Ordinance No. 4389 adopted to temporarily prohibit landmark tree removal while permanent tree regulations are developed. When the tree code was initially adopted in 2021 to advance Goal 1A of the Edmonds Urban Forest Management Plan, City Council recognized the need for a second phase of amendments to address tree removals on private property. The City scoped, funded, and allocated staff resources for this work in 2023; however, the project was delayed before proposed amendments could be adopted. Between 2023 and 2025, the City enacted several ordinances to resolve code interpretation challenges, respond to legal issues, and establish interim landmark tree protections. Some of these changes have reduced overall code clarity and cohesion relative to best practices. The 2026 Tree Code Update project will comprehensively address these concerns. Drawing on existing data, policy guidance, industry best practices, and stakeholder input from both 2023 and 2026 processes, the amendments will aim to: Establish appropriate levels of restrictiveness and regulatory approach for tree removal in development and non-development scenarios, aligned with the code's stated intent and purpose. Resolve persistent interpretation issues and minimize legal risks by incorporating best practices in code structure, terminology, and requirements for tree removal and retention. Develop clear, evidence-based language informed by jurisdictional trends and guidance from resources such as the Municipal Research and Services Center (MRSC), American Planning Association Washington Chapter (APA WA), and King County's Guide for Developing Effective Tree Regulations (2024). In summary, the 2026 tree code update scope includes: Incorporating a citywide canopy cover goal into the code's intent and purpose as a measurable performance metric. Defining landmark trees and establishing an appropriate regulatory framework. Exploring strategies to reduce ongoing tree canopy loss on private property. Implementing code refinements for consistency and clarity, guided by policy direction, best practices, prior analyses, and stakeholder feedback. Work Plan & Project Timeline Due to prior delays, the City must revise the work plan and timeline tied to Interim Ordinance No. 4389 (Attachment 1). Adopted in April 2025, this ordinance provided temporary landmark tree protections pending permanent regulations, originally set to expire in April 2026. With the project starting eight months later than anticipated, only four months remain for review and adoption by staff, stakeholders, the Planning Board, and City Council. To extend the ordinance by six months, state law requires a public hearing. A hearing on extending Ordinance No. 4389 is scheduled for April 14, 2026, solely to prevent expiration and authorize the extension. As outlined in the revised work plan (Attachment 2), staff will collaborate with the Planning Board through June 2026 to review and refine code improvement areas. The Planning Board will evaluate key concepts informed by focus group input and staff recommendations, followed by draft code development for review by the Tree Board and Planning Board. City Council will receive a briefing in June 2026. The Planning Board will then conduct a public hearing and forward its recommendation to Council, enabling adoption by October 2026—prior to the extended interim ordinance expiration. Item 9.1 Packet pg. 179/223 Engagement Strategy All results from the 2023 tree code update engagement—including a public survey, two workshops, and three stakeholder groups—will be shared with the Planning Board. For the compressed 2026 timeline, a focus group was convened modeled after the Critical Areas Ordinance process. This group provides balanced representation from property owners across varying canopy densities, environmental/climate advocates, arborists, and developers/builders, plus a Planning Board liaison. Participants represent organizations such as the International Society of Arboriculture (ISA), Master Builders Association of King and Snohomish Counties (MBAKS), Friends of Edmonds Trees (FOET), Climate Advisory Board (CAB), Edmonds Citizens’ Tree Board, and the Mayor’s Climate Protection Committee. Discussions target specific code improvements tied to upcoming Planning Board topics (see Attachment 3 for schedule and agenda). With mayoral approval, a special meeting of the currently paused Citizens’ Tree Board will be scheduled for draft code review. RECOMMENDATION: No alternatives are presented. This agenda item is informational and process-focused only. BUDGET IMPACTS: No fiscal impacts at this time. Most resulting actions will align with existing city programs, while some strategies may require new or dedicated resources. ITEM HISTORY: N/A ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: ATTACHMENTS: 1. Ordinance No. 4389 and Work Plan 2. Revised Work Plan & Timeline 3. Focus Group Topics & Meeting Schedule 4. Feb 24, 2026 City Council Meeting Presentation Item 9.1 Packet pg. 180/223 ORDINANCE NO. 4389 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ESTABLISHING AN INTERIM REGULATION TO PROHIBIT THE REMOVAL OF CERTAIN LANDMARK TREES ON A TEMPORARY BASIS, SETTING ONE YEAR AS THE EFFECTIVE PERIOD OF THE INTERIM REGULATION AND ADOPTING A WORK PLAN. WHEREAS, the city council adopted Ordinance 4217 on March 2, 2021, establishing an interim regulation to temporarily prohibit the removal of certain landmark trees; and WHEREAS, the city council adopted Resolution 1471 on April 27, 2021, adopting findings of fact to justify the earlier adoption of the interim ordinance and extending its effectiveness until September 2, 2021; and WHEREAS, Ordinance 4217 was intended to be temporary while the city continued work on drafting permanent revisions to the tree code; and WHEREAS, Ordinance 4217 was not renewed or extended after it expired on September 2, 2021; and WHEREAS, the tree code amendments that were contemplated in 2021 were delayed due to various staffing changes and reductions in the planning and development department and the need to prioritize the periodic update of the comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the 2023 Climate Action Plan, adopted on March 21, 2023, via Resolution 1518, reinforces the importance of protecting and maintaining the city’s tree canopy; and WHEREAS, the city council would like to renew the effort to protect landmark trees in conjunction with its ongoing development code update, which arises from the recently adopted periodic update to the city’s comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, this ordinance will provide temporary protection to trees that have a diameter at breast height of thirty inches or more; and WHEREAS, it will take about a year for the City to evaluate and consider the merits, scope, and details of its permanent regulation; and WHEREAS, the city council desires to adopt the following interim regulation to temporarily protect landmark trees while this work can be done; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Item 9.1 Packet pg. 181/223 Section 1. Purpose. The purpose of this interim regulation is to temporarily protect certain landmark trees from “tree removal” as that term is defined in ECDC 23.10.020.V. This temporary protection is intended to be in place while the city establishes permanent regulations to govern the removal of such trees. For the purposes of this ordinance, a “landmark tree” shall be defined as any tree with a diameter at breast height (DBH) of thirty inches or more. Section 2. Applicability. The permitting exemption contained in ECDC 23.10.040.A shall not extend to landmark trees. This ordinance shall not apply to any tree removal associated with and permitted through a complete building permit application that has already been submitted. This ordinance shall not apply to trees proposed to be removed in conjunction with development activity pursuant to ECDC 23.10.060. This ordinance shall not apply to a tree removal permit that has already issued. Section 3. Prohibition. For as long as this ordinance remains in effect, it shall be unlawful to direct any act of tree removal toward a landmark tree, as that term is defined in Section 1, above, unless the landmark tree also meets the definition of hazard tree in ECDC 23.10.020.H or nuisance tree in 23.10.020.N. Section 4. Duration of Interim Regulations. As long as the City holds a public hearing on the interim regulations, the interim regulations shall not terminate until one year after the effective date of this ordinance, unless it is repealed sooner. The city council hereby adopts the work plan attached as Exhibit A hereto to justify the one-year period of this interim ordinance pursuant to RCW 36.70A.390. Section 5. Public Hearing on Interim regulations. Pursuant to RCW 36.70A.390 and RCW 35A.63.220, the City Council shall hold a public hearing on this interim regulation within Item 9.1 Packet pg. 182/223 Item 9.1 Packet pg. 183/223 APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY: BY JEFF TARADAY FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: April 17, 2025 PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: April 21, 2025 PUBLISHED: April 24, 2025 EFFECTIVE DATE: April 29, 2025 ORDINANCE NO.: 4389 Item 9.1 Packet pg. 184/223 1 SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. 4389 of the City of Edmonds, Washington On the 21st day of April, 2025, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed Ordinance No. 4389. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting of the title, provides as follows: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ESTABLISHING AN INTERIM REGULATION TO PROHIBIT THE REMOVAL OF CERTAIN LANDMARK TREES ON A TEMPORARY BASIS, SETTING ONE YEAR AS THE EFFECTIVE PERIOD OF THE INTERIM REGULATION AND ADOPTING A WORK PLAN. The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request. DATED this 21st day of April, 2025. CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY Item 9.1 Packet pg. 185/223 Exhibit A Work Plan for Developing a Permanent Tree Code to Protect Landmark Trees • Study case law application of “takings” issues related to trees (June-July 2025) • Analyze city’s tree permit types and trends in recent years (July- August –2025) • Identify and evaluate specific problems with the existing tree code (August- September, 2025) • Clarify intent in updating the tree code (October 2025) • Clarify key definitions, including definition of landmark trees October 2025) • Study options for tree removal and replacement requirements (November- December 2025) • Analyze types of tree permits needed and the processes to make them effective (December 2025-January 2026) • Study options for enforcement of tree regulations (January 2026) • Identify level of staffing needed to implement and enforce permanent tree code ordinance (February 2026) • Develop specific draft language for updating tree code and get input from Planning Board and public (February-March 2026) • Bring draft code to City Council, have public hearing, and adopt final version (March-April 2026) Item 9.1 Packet pg. 186/223 Item 9.1 Packet pg. 187/223 Item 9.1 Packet pg. 188/223 2026 TREE CODE UPDATES PROJECT WORK PLAN & TIMELINE 6 5 1 Date Group Action Topic/Key Decision Points Jan 14 Planning Board Discussion: Project Intro, approach (scope, timeline, public engagement) N/A Jan 28 Planning Board Discussion: Citywide UTC%Citywide UTC% Feb 12 Focus Group Project Intro & Discussion: Feb 25 PB Meeting Topics History, background, FG ground rules Feb 25 PB Meeting Topics Feb 24 City Council Briefing: Project Intro (Reading 1)N/A Feb 25 Planning Board Discussion: Code Org, Definitions (including Landmark) Citywide UTC% (continued from Jan 28) General Code Organization Definitions (4-5 updates), landmark tree (new) TBD Focus Group Discussion: Mar 25 PB Meeting Topics See below Mar 25 Planning Board Discussion: Tree Removal Unrelated to Development (new)Number of allowed tree removals Frequency Pro-rate per property size? Replacements Permit vs. notification Apr 14 City Council Public Hearing (Reading 2)Adopt six-month extension of Interim Landmark Tree Ordinance (through Oct 2026) TBD Focus Group Discussion: Apr 22 PB Meeting Topics See below Apr 22 Planning Board Discussion: Tree Retention w/ Development, Part I Tree retention requirements Tree replacement requirements, including >24” DBH Fees in lieu of planting Tree protection measures TBD Focus Group Discussion: May 27 PB Meeting Topics See below May 27 Planning Board Discussion: Tree Retention w/ Development, Part II Fee in lieu “cap” Conservation Subdivision Required Landscaping Jun 9 City Council Briefing: Project Update (Reading 3)N/A TBD Focus Group Discussion: Jun 10 PB Meeting Topics See below Jun 10 Planning Board Discussion: “Other” Code Updates Maintenance assurance (bonds) Other: emergency tree removals, violations, liability, etc. Street Trees? Tree Fund? Jun 10+ Staff Establish Draft Code ECDC 17.130 (V1)N/A Jun 10+ Staff Submit Draft Code to meet state/local code update requirements (V1) SEPA Determination (Ecology) 60-Day Notice of Intent to Adopt (Commerce) TBD Tree Board Discussion: Draft Code Recommendation Review Draft Code (V1) Provide recommendation to PB Jun 24 Planning Board Discussion: Review Draft Code + Tree Board recommendation Action: Approve changes to the code Review Draft code (V1) Consider Tree Board recommendations Provide direction for code changes (V2) Item 9.1 Packet pg. 189/223 2026 TREE CODE UPDATES PROJECT WORK PLAN & TIMELINE 6 5 1 Jul 22 Planning Board Public Hearing Hold public hearing: Draft ECDC 17.130 (V2) Provide direction for any code changes (V3) Recommendation to Council (FCR) Aug 4?City Council Review and Discuss Draft ECDC 17.130 (Reading 4) Receive PB recommendation (V3) Q&A, discussion Sept 8 City Council Public Hearing (Reading 5)Hold public hearing: Draft ECDC 17.130 (V3) Q&A, discussion Sept 22 City Council Review and Discuss: public hearing testimony. Action: approve changes to the code (Reading 6) Review Draft ECDC 17.130 (V3) + Ordinance Discuss public feedback Provide direction for code changes (V4) Oct 6 City Council Approval of Ordinance Amending ECDC 17.130 (Reading 7) Consent Agenda Item Oct 6+Staff Submit signed Ordinance, Final Code 10- Day Notice of Adoption (Commerce) Oct 15 N/A 6-month moratorium extension expires Nov+Staff Implementation Code publishing, training, public education, etc. Item 9.1 Packet pg. 190/223 2026 TREE CODE UPDATES FOCUS GROUP MEETING TOPICS - SCHEDULE 6 5 2 Focus Group Meeting #1 - February 12, 2026 1. Introductions 10 min 2. Code Update Process Background Scope, timeline, public engagement Focus Group role, meeting format Resources: Jan 14, Jan 28 Planning Board meetings, King County Guide for Tree Codes 10 min 3. Review of Feb 25th Planning Board Meeting Topics Citywide canopy cover goal (ECDC 23.10.000/Intent & Purpose) Code Organization (ECC 3.95, ECDC 20.13, ECDC 18.85, ECDC 20.75.048, etc. Definitions, including landmark tree (ECDC 23.10.020) 5 min 4. Discussion 30 min 5. Wrap up: schedule future meeting dates*5 min Optional Q&A, discussion time ½ hour Focus Group Meeting #2 – Tuesday, March 10 at 9am 1. Intro 5 min 2. Review of March 25 Planning Board Meeting Topics Tree Removal Unrelated to Development (new code, somewhat covered in ECDC 23.10.030-050, Permits, Exemptions and Tree Removal Prohibited) Number of allowed tree removals Frequency Pro-rate per property size? Replacements Permit vs. notification 5 min 3. Discussion 45 min 4. Wrap up 5 min Optional Q&A, discussion time ½ hour Focus Group Meeting #3 – date? 1. Intro 5 min 2. Review of April 22 Planning Board Meeting Topics Tree Retention w/ Development, Part I (ECDC 23.10.060-080) Tree retention requirements Tree replacement requirements, including >24” DBH Fees in lieu of planting Tree protection measures 5 min Item 9.1 Packet pg. 191/223 2026 TREE CODE UPDATES FOCUS GROUP MEETING TOPICS - SCHEDULE 6 5 2 3. Discussion 45 min 4. Wrap up 5 min Optional Q&A, discussion time ½ hour Focus Group Meeting #4 – date? 1. Intro 5 min 2. Review of May 27 Planning Board Meeting Topics Tree Retention w/ Development, Part II (ECDC 23.10.060-080, Fee in lieu “cap” (ECDC 23.10.080.E.4) Conservation Subdivision (ECDC 20.75.048,) Required Landscaping (ECDC 20.13) 5 min 3. Discussion 45 min 4. Wrap up 5 min Optional Q&A, discussion time ½ hour Focus Group Meeting #5 – date? 1. Intro 5 min 2. Review of June 10 Planning Board Meeting Topics “Other” Code Updates Maintenance assurance (bonds) ECDC 23.10.090 Other: emergency tree removals, violations, liability, etc. Street Trees? (ECDC 18.85) Tree Fund? (ECC 3.95) 5 min 3. Discussion 45 min 4. Wrap up 5 min Optional Q&A, discussion time ½ hour Item 9.1 Packet pg. 192/223 City Council Meeting, Reading #1 February 24, 2026 2026 Tree Code Update Item 9.1 Packet pg. 193/223 Jan 28 Feb 24 Feb 25 Mar 25 Apr 14 Apr 22 May 27 June 9 Jun 10 Jun 24 July 22 Aug 4 Sept 8 Sept 22 Oct 6 2026 Project Timeline 6-Month Extension Expires Focus Group Meetings Jan 14 Item 9.1 Packet pg. 194/223 Project Scope •Establish citywide tree canopy cover goal •Define landmark trees and determine an appropriate regulatory approach •Slow the loss of tree removals on private property •Consider code changes for consistency and clarity based on policy guidance, best practices, prior analysis and stakeholder feedback. CITY OF EDMONDS 2026 Tree Code Update 3 Item 9.1 Packet pg. 195/223 Public Engagement •2023 survey, 2 public workshops, 3 stakeholder meeting results •2026 Focus Group: inform Planning Board decisions on key code concepts such as code organization, definitions (including landmark trees), tree removal and retention requirements, etc. Item 9.1 Packet pg. 196/223 Next Steps 5CITY OF EDMONDS 2026 Tree Code Update Apr 14th - Public hearing to extend interim ordinance Jun 9th – Project update Aug 4th – Review and discuss Planning Board recommendation Sept 8th – Public hearing on draft tree code Sept 22nd – Provide direction on code changes Oct 6th – Adoption Item 9.1 Packet pg. 197/223 City Council Agenda Item 9.2 February 24, 2026 - Regular Meeting TITLE:City Council Resolution Establishing Priorities and Governance, Financial Stability, and Community Outcomes (Second Reading) DEPARTMENT:City Council Office PRESENTER:Michelle Dotsch NEEDED FROM COUNCIL:Action RECOMMENDATION:Move to adopt: A resolution of the City Council of the City of Edmonds establishing city council priorities, and declaring engagement, communication and transparency as the guiding framework for all priorities. BUDGET: Total Dollar Amount:0 ☐ Approved in Budget Fund(s):N/A ☐ Budget Reallocation Required ☒ No Budget Impact PROBLEM/ISSUE STATEMENT: Council held a retreat in February to discuss and refine the priorities for year 2026. CONTEXT, ANALYSIS, & ALTERNATIVES: Item 9.2 Packet pg. 198/223 February 6 – At the retreat, council began identifying priority areas and drafted language that began the process to form clear council priorities that reflect our current reality and future vision. These draft priorities are intended to be a shared council direction that will guide upcoming budget discussions, staff work plans, and policy choices. The retreat session was intentionally not specific to tactics, projects, or solutions. Instead, its purpose was to create shared clarity on desired outcomes and success conditions, so that the subsequent workflows come from a common understanding. Effective priority statements strike the balance: language that is too broad does not provide enough guidance for implementation, while other wording can be over detailed and limit flexibility of staff to identify solutions. Council’s intent is to land in the middle – clear on direction and outcomes, flexible on implementation. At the retreat, council and staff used colored dots to identify sequencing of priorities. *Council priorities represent a focused set of outcomes that Council is emphasizing this year. They are not intended to represent the full scope of Council responsibilities, statutory obligations, or ongoing work. Next steps: 1) Council finalized priority topics, wording, and relative order/tiers 2) Department Directors receive the adopted priorities and organize department work under each priority area. 3) At a future study session, staff returns to council with aligned work areas. activities, and key deliverables February 11, Study session – council reviewed the language as drafted for the Council priorities and massaged the language and council was offered another week to review and consider the language. Attached is the draft of the resolution for Council Priorities for 2026. Next step: 1) Department Directors received the adopted priorities and organize department work under each priority area. 2) At a future study session, staff returns to council with aligned work areas, activities, and key deliverables. RECOMMENDATION: Move to adopt: A resolution of the city council of the City of Edmonds establishing city council priorities, and declaring engagement, communication and transparency as the guiding framework for all priorities. BUDGET IMPACTS: None ITEM HISTORY: February 6th – Retreat – initial priorities outlined February 11th – Study Session – priority language presented and discussed ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: ATTACHMENTS: Resolution Exhibit A Item 9.2 Packet pg. 199/223 Item 9.2 Packet pg. 200/223 RESOLUTION NO. _____ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS ESTABLISHING CITY COUNCIL PRIORITIES AND A GOVERNING FRAMEWORK FOR IMPLEMENTATION. WHEREAS, the Edmonds City Council held a workshop retreat and study session on February 6 and February 11, 2026, to identify and refine key priorities to guide the City’s strategic direction; and WHEREAS, the Council recognizes the need for clear, outcome focused priorities that can be used for budgeting, performance tracking, and implementation; and WHEREAS, the Council recognizes that effective governance depends upon engagement, communication, and transparency as foundational practices that support community trust, organizational alignment, and accountability; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AS FOLLOWS: The purpose of this resolution is to establish the Edmonds City Council’s priorities and the framework through which said priorities will be implemented: 1. Financial Stability Establish disciplined, outcomes-focused budgeting across all city spending – aligning discretionary investments with Council priorities, tracking performance and results for required services, and strengthening stable revenue plans to move the city out of crisis mode. 2. Strategic Clarity and Direction Establish clear council priorities and objectives to guide strategic decision-making and enable modern, outcomes-focused governance that delivers clearer, more consistent results for the community. 3. Prioritization, Trade-offs, and Capacity Make clear, equitable, and transparent choices about city priorities, recognizing limited capacity, and focusing efforts where they deliver the greatest overall community benefit. 4. Economic Development Support and strengthen existing businesses while attracting new businesses and shaping economic growth and redevelopment opportunities that preserve Edmonds neighborhood character and advance long-term financial stability. Item 9.2 Packet pg. 201/223 The priorities set forth in this resolution define the council’s focus. These priorities shall be implemented and evaluated through a consistent commitment to engagement, communication, and transparency as governing practices that guide how the council conducts its work. This framework ensures clarity of process, accessibility of information, and accountability in how community and stakeholder input informs decision-making across all priorities Attached Exhibits: Exhibit A RESOLVED this ___ day of ________, 20. CITY OF EDMONDS Mayor, Mike Rosen ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED City Clerk, Luke Lonie Item 9.2 Packet pg. 202/223 EXHIBIT A Item 9.2 Packet pg. 203/223 City Council Agenda Item 9.3 February 24, 2026 - Regular Meeting TITLE:Removal of Mayor's Finance Update (First Reading) DEPARTMENT:City Council Office PRESENTER:Michelle Dotsch NEEDED FROM COUNCIL:Action RECOMMENDATION:Move to remove the standing Mayor’s Finance update from the Presentation section of each regular meeting. BUDGET: Total Dollar Amount:0 ☐ Approved in Budget Fund(s):N/A ☐ Budget Reallocation Required ☒ No Budget Impact PROBLEM/ISSUE STATEMENT: With the new Finance Committee, it has been suggested that the Finance Update during each regular meeting in the Presentation section, is no longer needed. CONTEXT, ANALYSIS, & ALTERNATIVES: On July 2nd, 2024, motion was made by then councilmember Dotsch, and seconded by then Council President Olson, to have a standing agenda item of a finance update at each regular meeting. The Mayor has been presenting the update at each regular meeting . RECOMMENDATION: Move to remove the standing Mayor’s Finance update from the Presentation section of each regular meeting. BUDGET IMPACTS: 0 ITEM HISTORY: July 2, 2024. The motion was made and seconded to add the finance update to Presentations ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: ATTACHMENTS: Council minutes from July 2, 2024 Item 9.3 Packet pg. 204/223 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes July 2, 2024 Page 1 EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL MEETING DRAFT MINUTES July 2, 2024 ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT Mike Rosen, Mayor Vivian Olson, Council President Chris Eck, Councilmember Will Chen, Councilmember Neil Tibbott, Councilmember Michelle Dotsch, Councilmember Susan Paine, Councilmember Jenna Nand, Councilmember STAFF PRESENT Kim Dunscombe, Deputy Admin. Serv. Director Susan McLaughlin, Planning & Dev. Dir. Todd Tatum, Comm., Culture & Econ. Dev. Dir. Jeff Taraday, City Attorney Scott Passey, City Clerk Jerrie Bevington, Camera Operator 1. CALL TO ORDER/FLAG SALUTE The Edmonds City Council meeting was called to order at 6:59 pm by Mayor Rosen in the Council Chambers, 250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds, and virtually. The meeting was opened with the flag salute. 2. LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Councilmember Paine read the City Council Land Acknowledge Statement: “We acknowledge the original inhabitants of this place, the Sdohobsh (Snohomish) people and their successors the Tulalip Tribes, who since time immemorial have hunted, fished, gathered, and taken care of these lands. We respect their sovereignty, their right to self-determination, and we honor their sacred spiritual connection with the land and water.” 3. ROLL CALL City Clerk Scott Passey called the roll. All elected officials were present. 4. APPROVAL OF AGENDA COUNCILMEMBER PAINE MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON, TO APPROVE THE AGENDA IN CONTENT AND ORDER. Council President Olson requested the minutes for the PPW committee meeting on the Consent Agenda be amended to delete her name as she was not present. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 5. AUDIENCE COMMENTS Jim Ogonowski, Edmonds, thanked the Blue Ribbon Panel for their work and recommendations. He referenced the recommendation regarding engagement with the public, noting he did not see an emphasis Item 9.3 Packet pg. 205/223 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes July 2, 2024 Page 2 on education, educating the public on the process and the challenges facing the City as well as educating elected officials. Educating public officials includes how to read and understand monthly financial statements to avoid what has occurred in the past as well as regarding the budget process. He opined the City has been through a spending process over the past several years, but not a true budgeting process. Education will help the council in their fiduciary oversight responsibilities to ensure the City is heading in the right direction., Will Morris, Marysville, President, Edmonds Police Officers Association, commented on the budgeting process and issues it is causing in the police department, including members feeling there is a lack of job security and uncertainty. The law support and commissioned officers just completed collective bargaining negotiations and now feel the hard work and relationship building during that process are being taken away or that members were promised something that will not be followed through on. With the hard work done to establish a diverse department, new, diverse officers about to complete field training do not feel they will have a job in the next 18 months. In response to council questions at the special meeting held before this meeting, he advised there are currently 10 vacancies and a department member put in retirement paperwork today bringing vacancies to 11. Additional positions were approved, but the department is currently 3 below 2019 numbers and 5 officers are in field training. The number of approved officers equates to 1.5 officers/1,000 residents; the current staffing level is 1.18 officers/1,000 residents and the national average is 2.4 officers/1,000 residents. Until February, the department was operating with less than 1 officer/1,000 residents. There has not been a fully functional police department since 2019. What that looks like, for example as a traffic officer, he hasn’t been doing his specialty enforcing DUIs and traffic laws because he is answering patrol calls due to minimum staffing levels. He expressed interest in a more concerted effort toward public safety and not turning the City’s financial crisis and issues into a public safety issue. 6. RECEIVED FOR FILING 1. WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS 7. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS COUNCILMEMBER PAINE MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON, TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS AMENDED. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. The agenda items approved are as follows: 1. APPROVAL OF COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES JUNE 18, 2024 2. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES JUNE 25, 2024 3. APPROVAL OF CLAIM CHECKS AND WIRE PAYMENT 4. AUTHORIZATION TO PURCHASE (1) 2024 FREIGHTLINER 800 SERIES JET TRUCK 8. COUNCIL BUSINESS 1. BLUE RIBBON PANEL REPORT Mike Bailey, Financial Consultant, acknowledged Blue Ribbon Panel members in the audience. He is a retired financial director and has been assisting the City by leading the Blue Ribbon Panel’s work. He reviewed: • Blue-Ribbon Panel Members o Mike Bailey, CPA o Erin Monroe, CPA o Troy Rector, CPA, CGMA o Carl Zapora o Rick Canning Item 9.3 Packet pg. 206/223 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes July 2, 2024 Page 3 o Scott James, CPA o Darrol Haug o 13 in-person meetings, almost perfect attendance, invested over 20 hours in meeting and more in studying on own. o Dedicated and interested in issue. Commend them for their work. • The Panel’s Work Products (provided to council following this presentation) 1. Executive Summary 2. Strategic Approach to Fiscal Resiliency 3. Fiscal First Aid 12 Step Project Plan 4. Financial Health Model 5. Memo to Mayor Rosen – February 20, 2024 6. Price of Government Description • Our Charge 1. What is the current status of the City’s finances? 2. How did this problem occur? 3. Make recommendations to correct the situation. 4. Make recommendations that return the City to long-term financial health. • Our Methods 1. Utilize the GFOAs 12 steps to Fiscal First Aid 2. Reviewing past and current budgets 3. Requested and reviewed information that enabled deeper analytics of the situation 4. Reviewed the Fire and EMS service issues the City is currently considering and their implications 5. Explored various “what-if” scenarios • Specific Responses to Our Charge o What is the current status of the City’s finances 1. 2023 ending fund balance in the General Fund is $2.492 million 2. This compares unfavorably to the budgeted EFB of $3.047 million 3. The budget imbalance in 2024 is about $12.5 million o How Did This Problem Occur? 1. Budgeted expenditures exceeded revenues in 3 of the past 4 years a. Amendments to the budgets made this worse in each year 2. Revenues were overestimated (enabling budgeted expenditures to be higher than actual revenues in 3 of the past 4 years. Item 9.3 Packet pg. 207/223 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes July 2, 2024 Page 4 o Illustration of Fund Balance Decline o Make recommendations to correct the situation 1. New sources of non-tax revenues: increased fees, red light cameras, and other revenue increases; 2. Expense reductions: headcount reductions, furloughs, professional service and other non- compensation reductions; 3. New taxes: The 1% annual increase for EMS, and General Fund (GF) should be done. Additional property levy for GF and / or joining SCF will require a vote and would not impact the revenues until 2026. (Note: with the lag of significant revenue increases until 2025, the Panel recommends “bridging” the 2025 budget with borrowing internally from available surplus resources in other City funds) o Make recommendations that return the City to long-term financial health (informed by the GFOA’s Fiscal First Aid framework) 1. Continue generic treatments (hiring, scrutinize expenses, begin streamlining) 2. Develop and use a financial health model (a draft is provided) 3. Develop model and monitor cash-flow (done) 4. Review and develop relevant financial policies (in process) 5. Understand future operating budget impacts from capital improvements 6. Implement Priority Based Budgeting (PBB) to right-size (in process) 7. Evaluate revenues in the context of the “Price of Government” 8. Make updating related technology a priority 9. Evaluate deferred maintenance on City assets 10. Address the risks associated with this work 11. Develop a communication plan to keep stakeholders informed 12. Determine if the General Fund is subsidizing other funds 13. Review investment rates of return to maximize value 14. Evaluate capital funding options and develop a capital spending plan 15. Forecast the capital budget impacts for a rolling five years Item 9.3 Packet pg. 208/223 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes July 2, 2024 Page 5 • Illustration of Future Fund Balances (from adopted budget) • Fire and EMS Service Issues o The Panel is aware of the current issues related to providing fire and emergency medical services to the City. o While there are clear budgetary implications related to alternatives, the Panel did not specifically address what the City should do to provide these services. o The Panel felt that it wasn’t within the scope of the Mayor’s request. o Clearly, the alternatives should be evaluated from provision of service, costs and sustainability of the chosen model perspectives. o The Financial Health Model facilitates such a review and illustrates the impact on taxpayers and ratepayers in the City. • Conclusion o It was appropriate for the Council to declare a fiscal emergency. o The magnitude of financial challenges facing the City cannot be underestimated. o Community confidence in the City's leadership will be essential. o The work to remedy the situation will be difficult – and important. o The overall impact on the City’s tax and ratepayers should be of significant concern in identifying solutions. o Our work took time to do properly – we feel we were given adequate time and resources to provide helpful feedback to the Mayor. o We appreciate the support provided by the Mayor and staff. Councilmember Paine commented Mr. Bailey always provided great service to the City and council regarding budgeting. She appreciated the suggestion about considering the policy for contingency and reserve funds and replenishing those funds. She asked if the Panel had any specific suggestions. Mr. Bailey answered the Panel discussed whether the levels in the current policy were too high given everything else that’s going on and the Panel did not want the City to cut the budget so much and impose hardships to accommodate a reserve policy that might be a bit high right now and possibly the target could be lowered somewhat and continue to deliver as much service as possible and revisit it in the future. Part of the problem that has occurred is confusion over fund balance numbers; at times those numbers includes General Fund subfunds and at times those are excluded. Right now the numbers are similar so there was confusion about which number applied to which fund. Being very clear about what the pockets of money are for is important and to the extent they are money sitting in the bank versus delivering services is something for the council to consider. Item 9.3 Packet pg. 209/223 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes July 2, 2024 Page 6 Councilmember Paine asked whether the Panel suggests reforecasting revenue mid-year before the budget process begins. She recognized forecasting revenue was a bit of art, science and trust in the data. Mr. Bailey agreed forecasting in August for the next year is an art form. Due to the upcoming budget process, the council has scheduled a mid-year check that will look at the current year’s revenue performance as well as get a sense of the future budget which will create an opportunity to reevaluate the revenue forecast. Accountants and finance directors tend to be conservative and would rather collect more revenue than the forecast. Conservative forecasts usually mean budgets don’t have to be cut later in the year because the revenue targets weren’t met. That hasn’t been the case in Edmonds which has contributed to the problem. The council will have the opportunity to revisit that at the August mid-year check in. Councilmember Paine referred to the graph on packet page 38, Illustration of Future Fund Balances, and asked if the graph assumed doing nothing. Mr. Bailey answered yes. Councilmember Paine commented there was a lot of information in the materials provided. She was glad to see following the salary study and salary adjustments that they are not unreasonable for comparator cities. That has been voiced as part of the problem, but the data shows salaries are within the midpoint. Mr. Bailey answered the City has to have competitive salaries to have the kind of staff the City wants serving the community, but when cities overpay, it leads to budget problems. The Panel took a citywide view and when compared to other cities, found compensation was fairly consistent. Councilmember Paine commented the City has always chosen the midpoint. She asked if the Panel calculated the price of government specifically for Edmonds. Mr. Bailey answered yes and that information can be provided if it is not in the materials. Councilmember Paine said it would be interesting to see the source material to help understand the process. She expressed her appreciation for Mr. Bailey’s and the Panel’s work. Councilmember Chen thanked Mr. Bailey and the entire Panel for their hours of work attending meetings, conducting interviews, and helping the City figure out the problem and a path forward. He referred to the slide that illustrates spending outpaced revenue in 2022 and 2023, pointing out even though revenue increased somewhat, it was outpaced by expenditures. He asked whether the Panel uncovered any opportunities related to spending redundancy or spending that could have been avoided. He agreed with the Panel’s approach of not pointing fingers, but was interested in not repeating mistakes in the future. Mr. Bailey reiterated Councilmember Chen’s point about not pointing fingers, recalling the Panel and the mayor did not want the Panel’s work to turn into finding who was at fault. That was not the Panel’s focus and was not healthy for the city. The intent is to solve the problems, so dwelling on the past and who was at fault was not part of solution. Mr. Bailey continued, there are several redundancies not unique to Edmonds, but now that the City needs to identify ways to streamline and provide as much services as possible with the resources available, the Panel felt some of the redundancies were opportunities. The Panel had that conversation with the mayor and it is something he is reviewing. A big part of the recommendation, although it may not feel satisfactory at this point, is informing the upcoming budget process. In addition to priority based budgeted, looking at revenues, considering whether the General Fund is subsidizing other funds, finding efficiencies through streamlining and avoiding duplication of effort are also intended to be part of budget process. Ferreting those out will take some time. Councilmember Chen observed that information will come to council as part of the process. Mr. Bailey answered the intent is to set up the financial planning work and budgeting process in a way that helps inform those opportunities. Councilmember Chen observed another of the Panel’s recommendations was to bridge the 2025 budget by internal borrowing. That is an option, but although borrowing internally is easier, he preferred to explore other options such as increased revenue, reduced expenditures, etc. before borrowing internally. Mr. Bailey agreed borrowing would only be done as needed. The City can borrow externally, but it would be more expensive and involve more bureaucracy. The suggestion to borrow internally was because it would be more cost efficient for the City as a whole and the funds borrowed would be made whole. The funds are Item 9.3 Packet pg. 210/223 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes July 2, 2024 Page 7 currently invested in the City’s investment pool and earning interest, the same interest rate that the General Fund would be charged for borrowing internally. He agreed borrowing should be a last resort, but did not see how the City could avoid it in 2025 and suggested the council should expect that and other things the council may prefer not to do as part of getting through the difficulty and getting the City back on its feet. Councilmember Chen emphasized the General Fund, Fund 001, has a positive balance as of right now due to property taxes. Mr. Bailey said the financial information provided to the finance committee and council makes that clear. When the cash position declines below and the General Fund is borrowing from a cash flow standpoint over the course of the year and is paying interest, that is reported to the finance committee. He summarized significant improvements have been made to reporting so the committee is getting much better and more timely information than it received in the past. Councilmember Tibbott referred to the tech fix that Mr. Bailey alluded to. In the past the City has paid dearly for technology that was expected to be put in place. He asked the status of investments made in technology and new options that are forthcoming in that department. Mr. Bailey answered the core financial system the City uses to pay bills, pay employees, collect revenues, do all the bookkeeping, produce monthly, quarterly and annual financial reports was discontinued in early the 2000s so the City is using a system that has not been supported for over 20 years after being acquired by another company. As a result, a lot of the City’s systems are manual and many efficiencies will be realized by automating processes that should have been automated some time ago. The core financial systems are being replaced, but likely not until next year. In the meantime, the City acquired a budgeting software, OpenGov, a couple of years ago and began paying an annually renewing contract to implement a hosted system that is limited to budget development and hosted web-based illustrations, but that has yet to be implemented. This is the third year the City has been paying for that. He recommended to the mayor that having it for three years, not implementing it and continuing to pay for it was not providing the City much service and this would be a difficult time to implement a new budget system. Councilmember Tibbott asked for Mr. Bailey’s suggestions for new options. Mr. Bailey answered the system being considered for implementation next year is the current version of the software system the City has used in the past so it is familiar to staff. He recommended working toward implementation of that financial system, doing it carefully, but not trying to do it quickly. He anticipated the City would get more benefit from a thoughtful implementation than a quick implementation because quick implementations can create more risk which the City does not need at this point. Proceeding thoughtfully will be another opportunity to find efficiencies and help staff avoid doing things manually which raises concern with the State Auditor’s Office (SOA) such as manual payroll timekeeping. Councilmember Tibbott relayed his understanding the City was already paying for that new software. Mr. Bailey answered as soon as the City agreed to terms with the revised version of the financial system software, it will trigger payment for maintenance of the new system even though implementation is probably six months out. Councilmember Tibbott asked about Snohomish County’s exploration of the possibility of a public safety tax. Mr. Bailey said Mayor Rosen may have more current information. He was aware it would benefit the City and was certainly something to be aware of. Councilmember Nand thanked Mr. Bailey and members of Blue Ribbon Panel for their hard work, stepping in during a tumultuous time in the City’s finances. As the City moves forward into the upcoming budget cycle and the Blue Ribbon Panel is winding down, she asked who would oversee the City’s overall financial strategy. Mayor Rosen answered ultimately him, with assistance from Deputy Administrative Services Director Kim Dunscombe. Mr. Bailey has also been asked to stick around for a while. Item 9.3 Packet pg. 211/223 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes July 2, 2024 Page 8 For the public, Councilmember Nand referred to the Illustration of Future Fund Balances on packet page 38 which illustrates the structural budget gap. She acknowledged the affordability crisis in the community affecting a lot of people who are already financially distressed, seniors, people with disabilities and she assured the council did not look forward to increasing taxes and fees. She identified resources in the community that could provide relief to those in need including a team of volunteers at the Edmonds Waterfront Center assisting people who may be eligible for property tax relief; their phone number is 425- 774-5555. There are also a lot of resources available at the city, county and state level. Public Works has been sending quarterly notices regarding how to access rebates and the state provides bridge funds for people applying for social security and disability benefits. She encouraged anyone experiencing financial distress or who knows someone experiencing financial distress to contact the City’s dedicated human services staff in the parks department to avoid a resident becoming homeless or being forced to leave the community. Councilmember Dotsch thanked Mr. Bailey and the Blue Ribbon Panel. She asked the current interest rate on debt. Mr. Bailey answered the interest on investment is about 5.4%, but the interest rate on debt varies. Councilmember Dotsch asked the interest rate on the $8 million. Mr. Bailey answered there is no General Fund debt; as of the end of May, the General Fund is in a positive cash position. The amount of interest the General Fund has paid to date for the months it was in a cash deficit is reflected in the most recent financial report. The General Fund pays interest at the rate those funds would otherwise earn, currently 5.4%. Councilmember Dotsch asked if there was an estimate regarding the amount that needed to be borrowed to bridge 2025. Mr. Bailey answered it will depend. The City will need to find opportunities to increase resources and cut expenses one way or another which will inform the deficit amount that will occur in 2025. That forecast will be included in the materials the council receives in October with the mayor’s proposed budget. Identifying that amount at this point would be completely speculative. He did not think the City would have to borrow $12.5 million; he anticipated it would be far less than that. He pointed out whatever is borrowed has to made up in 2026 in order to end the biennium in a positive position. Councilmember Dotsch recognized the importance of involving the community and to understand their priorities, but understanding the price, it may be challenging to ask the community what they want and then say that’s not feasible. She asked about a check and balance to avoid giving too many choices/options that are unrealistic. Mr. Bailey answered it is always difficult to find the right way to ask a question to get informed answers that the council can rely on to make difficult decisions. The upcoming survey will be an attempt to gauge what are the most important things the City does for residents, how well the City is providing those services, and cost versus value issues. Having done surveys in various cities, they create data to help inform council conversations and considerations; the answers need to be informed by many other things in addition. Trying to understand what the community wants and what it is willing to pay for is an art form; understanding the price of government is another data point to inform that process. Councilmember Dotsch commented on the City’s core responsibilities and adding other opportunities and priorities as the financial situation improves, noting there is not much wiggle room. Mr. Bailey responded the Panel would agree, start with the core responsibilities and ensure those are done well, add needed things to the extent possible and lastly add the nice to have things that make Edmonds special. Councilmember Dotsch referred to Mr. Bailey’s comment about departments not being surprised. She asked if there were checks and balances so departments know their targets and whether they are meeting their goals. It seems like there needs to be more metrics than previously existed. Mr. Bailey answered in his first conversation with the department heads, they were very surprised to learn that the City was in fiscal distress and the information he shared was new to them, which from his perspective, was a problem. The mayor and the current financial leader is addressing that problem by having regular conversations particularly to ensure 2024 remains within the budget authorized by council to set up the City for success going forward. Item 9.3 Packet pg. 212/223 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes July 2, 2024 Page 9 It is time to hold down expenses and the sooner that is done, the easier it will be. Those conversations are ongoing and department heads are involved so the level of awareness is much higher. Councilmember Dotsch referred to the recommendations to have a standing council agenda item and asked if that would start next week. Mr. Bailey said when he was in the chief financial officer role in cities that were dealing with financial distress such as in 2008, one of the ways of making this work visible was to have it a standard item on the council’s agendas because the council wanted to the community to see them having the discussions and dealing with issues on a recurring basis. How that translates into how the Edmonds City Council wants to do that is a council decision. Creating more visibility demonstrates this is a high priority item for the council. There has been some concern the Blue Ribbon Panel did not check in sooner, but they needed time to do their work. Councilmember Dotsch expressed support for starting that agenda item right away. Councilmember Eck thanked Mr. Bailey and the Blue Ribbon Panel for their work, commenting the council owes them a debt of gratitude. As it relates to visibility with directors and programs and departments, she assured information cannot be over communicated; it is important to ensure everyone is on the same page. She asked if there was any ah-ha moments around new reporting, new ways of getting the word out, discoveries that will make communication more effective, etc. Mr. Bailey answered the tactic that Ms. Dunscombe is taking with regular check-ins is a great place to start. A lot of the ah-ah moments were related to the current budget and creating visibility related to issues. Once department heads were informed and advised they would need to be part of the solution, the response was good. They prefer to be involved and engaged in discussions rather than not know what’s going on and being dictated the consequences in the future. In his experience, department heads are leaders in their profession and want to be involved. Councilmember Eck agreed, commenting it is about transparency, empowerment and collaboration. Councilmember Eck asked if there was a best practice or standard in the industry for the percentage of a city’s budget that should be dedicated to the police department or the planning department. Mr. Bailey answered not really, all communities are different. That is one of the challenges with the concept of the price of government, Edmonds includes things in the General Fund that other cities don’t and vice versa. Some will say there is a standard and the City does not meet that standard, but Edmonds needs to look at what the community expects; standards will always be used to encourage a city to do more of whatever the person is asking for, whether that is police or fire or whatever else. One thing the council hasn’t gotten as part of the budget is level of service and quality of performance. The council gets reports from departments about what they do, but not as part of the budget conversation. As the council considers moving resources around to meet community needs, that will be important information to have – how well one need is being met versus another need that may be of higher importance. Without that information, it is difficult to make decisions. Council President Olson anticipated she may have a hard time communicating this question and she was unsure who to direct the question to. She asked for confirmation that the policy regarding when a fiscal emergency was declared was tied to the reserves. Mr. Bailey agreed. Council President Olson observed that was a bit of a moving target and possibly somewhat conservative and there may be a typical standard that is a little lower, but now the City is way under even that. She asked if whatever level the council determines in the short term is the right level, whether it would be prudent to tie capital investments to not having a fiscal emergency and whether that is something that will be tracked and whether the City will be out of the fiscal emergency once the reserves are replenished. Mr. Bailey responded if he understood the question correctly, his answer would be yes. The reserve targets are what triggered the fiscal emergency, but the reserve targets are relatively high for a city Edmonds’ size. If the reserve targets were reduced, the fiscal emergency was addressed and contingent reserve and General Fund reserve combined were 12% instead of 20%, that would enable the City to address other needs before Item 9.3 Packet pg. 213/223 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes July 2, 2024 Page 10 increasing the reserve levels. Those are judgment calls the council has to make, how much money is it prudent to have in the bank in case something occurs where money in the bank is needed, versus how much money should be put into service delivery. For example, if there are some resources left over at the end of 2024 and the fund balance target is exceeded, those funds could be added to the reserve to continue to build it or those funds could be put back into services or used for a one time expenditure that does not have to be sustained going forward. Moving reserves up and down and deciding what the reserve level should be to keep as much money providing services as possible while at the same time being prudent with reserves to meet unanticipated demands in the future such as a natural disaster will be important tradeoffs to consider in the upcoming budget process. Council President Olson said she was on board for having lower reserves, but if the City is doing bigger and riskier capital investments, there needs to be a bigger buffer because a natural disaster could also occur. Council President Olson said she has no authority to designate a Citizen of the Year, but if she did or her personal selection for Citizens of the Year would be the Blue Ribbon Panel. She could not offer enough gratitude to the members for the knowledge and expertise they offered to the community for free and the pittance paid to Mr. Bailey. The members of the Blue Ribbon Panel are very, very competent people who are paid well in their professional careers. The City needed their help and she was very grateful for their work. Mr. Bailey concurred, commenting it was a great group to work with. Councilmember Paine referred to packet page 57, 12 Steps to Financial Resilience, and enhancing revenues as one of the near term treatments, recalling discussion regarding grants during the last budget cycle. She asked if grants were helpful, did the Blue Ribbon Panel discuss grants, and how grants figured into the cost of government. Mr. Bailey answered grants can be helpful. He recommended as the City pursues grants, there be a way to determine which grants are the right ones to pursue so the City does not end up in a situation where the City is awarded a grant they don’t really want. A staff member may want the grant, but the City as a whole is not better off if that was not one of the City’s focuses at that time. In terms of the price of government, Redmond identified when big grants occurred due to their impact on the price of government. Redmond received a number of large grants and/or funding via partnership with Redmond’s large employer. Councilmember Paine referred to packet page 60, portfolio of strategies, and asked Mr. Bailey to expand on the statement, “The Blue-Ribbon Panel has expressed concerns about risks and potential risk mitigation strategies.” Mr. Bailey said the Blue Ribbon Panel was recommending a lot of change; staff is already very busy providing services to the community. The Panel acknowledged implementing change such as asking for performance information as part of departments’ budget presentation will be a lift which results in risk. Making a lot of changes all at once will be less elegant than the council may prefer. He encouraged the council to be gracious to the fact that staff will be doing their best. The council will get more and better information and the quality of the information will improve over time. Keeping existing employees on the City’s team will be also be important. Councilmember Paine liked the idea of having a standing agenda item related to financial status. She suggested agenda memos include a component related to fiscal impacts which she has seen done in other cities. Fiscal impacts are serious and the council needs to know what they are. COUNCILMEMBER DOTSCH MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON, TO ADD A STANDING COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM WITH MR. BAILEY OR HIS REPRESENTATIVE STARTING NEXT WEEK. Mayor Rosen advised it would not be the Blue Ribbon Panel. Mr. Bailey advised the Blue Ribbon Panel’s last meeting was last week. Item 9.3 Packet pg. 214/223 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes July 2, 2024 Page 11 Councilmember Dotsch asked who Mr. Bailey anticipated would provide an update. Mr. Bailey answered it would be at the mayor’s discretion, the council would be asking the mayor to provide that update whether it was staff or however the mayor chose to do it. Councilmember Dotsch said this generates more questions and she hated to lose the rest of this month and then it would be August, but she will leave it to the council president and mayor to discuss. She wanted the standing agenda item to start as soon as possible; her preference would be next week and if that wasn’t possible, the last meeting of the month. Council President Olson clarified the motion was to have the standing agenda item on the first available meeting and not specify which staff member would provide the update. Councilmember Dotsch agreed that was the motion. Council President Olson agreed it was good idea. Councilmember Nand, a member of the finance committee along with Councilmember Chen, was curious how a standing agenda item differed from the monthly update at the finance committee meeting. While it is a good idea to have heightened scrutiny, having staff at evening meetings requires paying overtime. If Ms. Dunscombe is providing this information to the finance committee and again at the council meeting, she suggested eliminating that report from the finance committee meeting. Council President Olson said it would be at the mayor’s discretion and he may even choose to provide the update himself. She agreed that was something the mayor should consider. Councilmember Chen said he liked the idea in general, but would leave the agenda planning up to the council president and mayor. MOTION CARRIED (5-2), COUNCILMEMBERS CHEN AND NAND VOTING NO. Mr. Bailey said the Blue Ribbon Panel was not suggesting to rehash the report provided at the monthly finance committee, but rather to keep the council informed of highlights relevant to the fiscal distress and budget planning for the upcoming biennium. There likely will be meetings where there is no update and the Blue Ribbon Panel was not suggesting it be a big part of the council’s agenda, it was intended as a check- in. Mayor Rosen thanked the Blue Ribbon Panel, explaining he called a bunch of people and told them although he wasn’t the mayor yet, he would need their help. On January 29 they all showed up, nobody said no, and they worked very hard. He expressed his sincere gratitude to them. Mayor Rosen declared a brief recess. 2. A RESOLUTION REGARDING THE LANDMARK 99 PROPERTY Planning & Development Director Susan McLaughlin described key reasons Landmark 99 was pursued as an opportunity including addressing a public space deficiency in the Highway 99 Subarea, seeking a catalyst for positive redevelopment, addressing safety concerns on Highway 99 via environmental design as well as police presence, and increasing the City’s sales and property tax bases. After years of planning and looking to stimulate redevelopment via the comprehensive plan, PROS plan, subarea planning, draft community renewal plan (CRP), development was still short of the subarea plan’s anticipated growth, only 20-28% of the subarea plan’s target of 185 residential units/year in the subarea and 10% of the annual target for non- residential development. The impact of that level of redevelopment was felt from a revenue perspective and the lack of change in the corridor. That was where the City found itself in Augusts 2023, taking action on the recommendations in those previous planning efforts. The Landmark 99 opportunity presented itself unexpectedly to serve as a potential catalyst to engage in a public-private partnership recommended in those plans. Item 9.3 Packet pg. 215/223 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes July 2, 2024 Page 12 Community, Culture & Economic Development Director Todd Tatum recapped the option agreement that had a deadline of March 31, 2025 to provide $1 million in earnest money and September 30, 2025 to close on the property. Negotiations with both the property owner and developer needed to occur during that time and financing would always be complicated. Between the time the council approved the option agreement and efforts such as master planning, a request for expression of interest was issued which a number of developers attended to discuss opportunities and challenges with the property, an RFP process was conducted as well as a selection process for a developer team. Key things learned during that process was developers want a partnership, they like the idea of partnering with the City and see mutual value. A partnership with the City helps to make places vibrant, lowers costs for both, gives developers a reason to add community amenities, and makes mixed use work more effectively. These types of property opportunities often occur in fits and starts. He recalled a comment that developments like this usually take 15 years in other cities, why is Edmonds trying to get it done in 4 years? In other cities with similar developments, it takes a long time to develop consensus and once consensus is achieved, development comes together more quickly. Mr. Tatum continued, cities often find when development struggles in areas where development is desired, the city needs to have skin in the game often via property ownership which gives them control and options. Other cities used a number of tools such as development agreements, tax increment financing or community renewal areas. In keeping with previous studies and plans, this process affirmed there is still community interest in amenities and services in the subarea. However, what was a narrow path has become far more challenging; options for the City to have skin in the game are significantly reduced due to the budget. What should be the focus of this area of the City is one of many giant conversations to be had this year and next year. The lack of fiscal resources affords the City no management reserves to manage risk moving forward. For those reason, the resolution recommends ceasing work on the Landmark 99 option. Ms. McLaughlin explained as described in the resolution, it is important to continue the City’s commitment to the Landmark 99 area. Interestingly, the recommendation for a public-private partnership in the CRP includes, 1) establishing the community renewal area, 2) identifying potential sites, and 3) assessing available City resources for acquisition. While staff found great value in seeking out this opportunity, there may still be opportunity on the Landmark site in the future and establishing those foundational pieces is key. As the resolution and agenda memo states, staff recommends: 1) pursue adoption of the draft CRP which has been reviewed by the planning board and the economic development commission and an overview presented to the city council, 2) study the feasibility of tax increment financing (TIF) for part or all of the subarea, and 3) assess City resources for acquisition. Establishing an investment fund will not only strengthen the City’s negotiating power, but also strengthen confidence that the City has the resources to pursue acquisition. Ms. McLaughlin summarized good fortune is what happens when opportunity meets planning. The City’s continued commitment to addressing deficiencies is critically important not only for social equity for Highway 99 residents and business owners, but also the economic well-being of the area. COUNCILMEMBER CHEN MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TIBBOTT, TO ADOPT THE RESOLUTION, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, RELATED TO COMMUNITY INVESTMENT IN THE HIGHWAY 99 SUBAREA AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO PURCHASING THE LANDMARK PROPERTY. Councilmember Chen commented considering Landmark 99 has been a long journey for the City, staff and council. From the beginning, he was very skeptical about this project due to the location, size and the City’s financial health. The only thing that caused him to vote for additional time to explore the opportunity was the attractiveness of the CRP, TIF, and grant obtained by a private company. Unfortunately the chemistry for the City did not come together. He appreciated staff and the administration realizing there are still Item 9.3 Packet pg. 216/223 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes July 2, 2024 Page 13 opportunities and challenges facing the Highway 99 subarea. At this time given the City’s financial health and after listening to Mr. Bailey presentation regarding the Blue Ribbon Panel’s findings and the challenges facing the City and what will need to be done to regain financial health, the best option is to step back and continue to establish a community fund, look into TIF and other potential programs, and build the City’s financial health. Councilmember Eck thanked Ms. McLaughlin and Mr. Tatum for the time they and their staffs invested in this potential venture. It was a lot of hard work and she recognized it must be difficult to pause at this point. Speaking as a resident, as someone with experience in human services, as an executive with a financial background, she was aware of complexity of the City’s financial issues. She will support the motion, but pointed out when the City was flush financially, not enough was done for this area. That part of Edmonds is Edmonds, Westgate is Edmonds, the Bowl is Edmonds, Five Corners is Edmonds, everywhere within the City limits should be treated equitably and the City should be investing equitably. She was not directing her comments at staff, but if the council plans to pass this resolution, the council needs to mean it because the community members who live in this part of town are tired of waiting. She understood the budget situation facing the City, but the residents and businesses in this area need to feel like the City is treating them like other areas of Edmonds. She assured she will continue to push on this issue because it is really important. COUNCILMEMBER NAND MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PAINE, TO STRIKE THE SECOND SENTENCE OF FIRST LEGALLY OPERATIVE SECTION OF THE RESOLUTION, “THE CITY COUNCIL SUPPORTS THE MAYOR’S RECOMMENDATION TO CEASE IMMEDIATE WORK RELATED TO THE LANDMARK PROPERTY.” Councilmember Nand explained the purpose of the amendment would not be to revive the $1 million investment in 2025 and proceed with exercising that option, but rather to leave the door open to continue negotiations with the land owner in the future. By approving the resolution, the council is telling the property owner that the City no longer wishes to move forward with purchasing the entire property of over 10 acres for $37 million but it would be foolhardy to shut the door entirely on potential future negotiations with the property owner. The City should stay engaged with all the property owners along Highway 99 because it is an area ripe for redevelopment in the future. In the future, the City could potentially negotiate purchasing a portion of the property which is what the administration attempted to do when the Parks, Recreation, and Human Services Director expressed interest in the two acres behind the Burlington Coat Factory as open space. Maintaining an open dialogue with the property owner, the City can have a seat at the table in future master planning with private partners. She preferred to leave open the possibility of renegotiation in the future if the City’s financial situation changes or if resources or interest from other levels of government change. It is always a good idea for the City to maintain a seat at the table. Councilmember Paine expressed support for the amendment. The City needs to maintain the ability to have a business relationship, conversation and dialogue with all members of the business community along Highway 99 particularly in this area due to the need for renewal and redevelopment and having a seat at the table to bring in resources. She expressed support for deleting this sentence, because this is a council decision. She supported maintaining relationships in the subarea and ensuring the City does not cut off its nose to spite its face. Councilmember Dotsch did not support the amendment, pointing out Section 2.A states, “Monitor the Landmark site and, if appropriate, engage in discussions with current or future landowners to identify potential opportunities” which would allow the City to move forward in the future if appropriate. Council President Olson agreed Section 2.A achieves the goal of keeping the door open and monitoring. Staff is seeking council support for the mayor’s intent to have staff cease work on this. A return to reserves is a prudent path forward before take on a risky venture. She supported the resolution as written. Item 9.3 Packet pg. 217/223 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes July 2, 2024 Page 14 Councilmember Tibbott did not support the amendment. It is important for the council to be clear with the land owner its intent not to follow through with the purchase agreement. As opportunities come up, he would consider working with a future developer or the property owner. The property owner has been clear in the past that he did not want to separate parcels out of the property. He agreed with Council President Olson that the mayor is giving council his best inclination and he anticipated the council will be getting a number of recommendations from the administration about cuts that need to be made; this happens to be one of them. It is not a particularly popular recommendation. He was an early supporter of this project, but it is better to make a clean break at this point and pursue other options as they arise in the future. Councilmember Chen said as much as he liked the engagement with the Landmark property owner and the businesses on Highway 99 in general, that intent is documented in the resolution. Now that this conclusion has been reached, he did not want to commit additional staff time, city attorney time or other resources. He did not support the amendment. MOTION FAILED (3-4), COUNCILMEMBERS PAINE, ECK AND NAND VOTING YES. Councilmember Paine did not support the main motion. The Landmark property acquisition showed the entire City the potential along Highway 99 and in that subarea. The opportunity for renewal and engagement with the business owners and community highlighted the need for resources in that area. The City needs to continue offering planning, vision and partnerships in that area by offering more than just lip services, but also community investments. The equity problem is absolutely enormous; Edmonds needs to have skin in the game and be a player in the area. That area has been neglected for generations and has suffered from bad planning practices in the 1950s and 1960s that divided that community. The City needs to continue working on opportunities to create investment in that area which will create dialogue and opportunities for additional amenities. She did not support the resolution, but was glad to see other elements in it. COUNCILMEMBER DOTSCH MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON, TO AMEND SECTION 2, TO STRIKE “IN 2024 AND 2025” AND SUBSTITUTE “IN 2025 AND BEYOND.” Councilmember Dotsch said future commitments to the Highway 99 subarea will require time, money, staff, and council bandwidth to do a great job for this area. She wanted the City to do it right and not rush it this year and next year by ensuring the resolution was not too tightly worded. Council President Olson commented the City has suffered a lot from workload and staffing shortages this year. Her preference is to focus on the comprehensive plan, budget changes as well as the fiscal stress the City is under in 2024. She will support the amendment. Councilmember Nand did not support the amendment, commenting this is isolationist. Other entities are already seeking to invest in Highway 99 such as Snohomish County’s investment in America’s Best Hotel. When the City doesn’t engage in critical discussions, the City has to take a very passive, bystander view and cannot represent the views of the constituents and community members particularly those who live in the subarea and are directly impacted by decisions made by property owners in the subarea. For example, America’s Best Hotel, the City is just sitting back with its hands folded and waiting for Snohomish County to provide updates because the county did not see Edmonds as a viable partner for that property at the outset. Councilmember Nand continued, allowing that sort of isolationism and disregarded view toward Highway 99 when other parties are potentially seeing investment opportunities would be a mistake. TIF and the CRP are resources and tools from the federal government. Other municipalities seek out those opportunities to enrich and benefit their community, increase their tax base and increase the quality of life for their community members; it’s not wrong for Edmonds to do that as well, especially for the underserved and Item 9.3 Packet pg. 218/223 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes July 2, 2024 Page 15 neglected Highway 99 subarea. She encouraged the City to remain engaged with master planning in the subarea and have open dialogue and conversations on behalf of 43,000 people in Edmonds to influence what happens there instead of continuing to treat it with neglect, noting she did not think there was such a thing as benign neglect. Councilmember Eck did not support the amendment. The language in Section 2 is staff’s recommendation which means they believe they have the capacity to support that effort beginning this year. Changing the language and not commemorating the intent to have conversations this year and do this modest work was the wrong message to send to that part of the City. Councilmember Paine did not support amendment, commenting the need for continuity and engagement in the community has never been more necessary and she did not want to delay that effort. Council President Olson asked if there was any tangible messaging or loss of support from partners by postponing to 2025 instead of 2024. It is already July so postponing to 2025 would not mean a lengthy delay. Ms. McLaughlin said the comment about momentum is spot on, what staff has done and learned, the relationships that have begun, conversations with community not only lend themselves to comprehensive planning conversations that staff is actively engaged in, but there is also a draft CRP. It is not beneficial for more time to go by, it is better to pick up that that plan, dust it off and pivot to that strategy right away. With regard to the feasibility of TIF, that needs to be contemplated in relation to the budget so it is not possible to wait to 2025 to think about that strategy, there needs to be consideration of whether it can be feasible in the 2025 budget. For those reasons, it is critical not to skip a beat. This is not a significant amount of staff time; a lot of the work will be leveraging work that is already actively occurring with the comprehensive plan or work that has already done with the draft CRP. Council President Olson commented there is an assumption that the council knows a lot more about TIF and the CRP than they actually do. Both those items have come to the council once and she did not know enough about them to know how whether it was an expense to the City, how they affected the budget, etc. She felt strongly the City should not be moving forward on any investments in the short term and asked how having TIF set up sooner rather than later would be helpful. Mr. Tatum answered timing wise it would be important to start conversations about community renewal in 2024. The consulting work that would produce a tax increment area plan is not expensive compared to other consulting efforts, but staff would like to include that in the budget for 2025 and then have the detailed conversation about TIF in 2025. That would provide a platform and a set of potential financing tools for 2025. He agreed there was a huge amount of conversation to be had regarding TIF, which he recommended not be attempted in 2024, but setting the groundwork for 2025 needs to happen in 2024 during the budget process. Council President Olson said she was willing not to support this amendment due to the staff and consulting work that has already been done, but the council is in the mode of not spending more money on consultants, lawyers, or even staff time when it takes away from other priority projects like creating a good budget. She was not confident TIF needed to be included in 2025 because she did not know anything about it yet. She was willing to give that allowance for work that has already been done, but she hoped staff was not getting mixed messages from council about spending money in 2024, because that cannot happen. Ms. McLaughlin clarified this is not a budget ask, it is a resolution showing intention. The TIF conversation will include providing more information to council about what it means at the time budget is requested. That work would not begin until 2025 and as Mr. Tatum mentioned, the consultant contract would be in the realm of $40,000. While right now that number is still not savory, as a consultant body of work that can stimulate investment in desperately needed infrastructure in that area, it is a good conversation to have as part of the budget. Council President Olson said she was open to having that conversation during the budget which is all the language in the resolution would make possible. She was willing to learn more about TIF, Item 9.3 Packet pg. 219/223 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes July 2, 2024 Page 16 but anticipated she would not support a consultant contract because the City has a $12 million deficit and adding $40,000 for something that is not necessary right now may not be the right idea. Councilmember Chen did not support the amendment. He thanked staff for their explanation regarding the work that has been done. The CRP and TIF does not equate to the Landmark project. Landmark is one of potential projects that could use those programs; without Landmark, the City and the Highway 99 area are still good candidates for community renewal, for TIF, for county and federal grants, and Amazon’s affordable housing grants. He has seen other communities get those grants, it just takes time. Removing the preparatory work in 2024 is not a wise choice. He referred to the saying, strike while the iron is hot; all this preparatory work has been done, money has been spent, and that knowledge needs to be retained and the area given the proper amount of attention. He did not want to give the perception that any money spent on Highway 99 was bad for the City; with the right amount of investment, there is potential to generate additional tax revenue as development occurs including on Highway 99. He pointed out ceasing work on acquisition of the Landmark property did not mean work on the entire corridor ceased. COUNCILMEMBER TIBBOTT CALLED THE QUESTION. COUNCILMEMBER CHEN SECONDED. CALL THE QUESTION FAILED (3-4), COUNCILMEMBERS TIBBOTT AND CHEN AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON VOTING YES. Councilmember Nand asked for clarification regarding the $70,000 Snohomish County invested via an affordable housing grant and how that could be parlayed into community renewal. Mr. Tatum said two different funding sources were discussed, the Affordable and Supportive Housing Tax Credit and a $100,000 grant (began as $75,000 and Snohomish County Councilmember Peterson helped increase it to $100,000). The City never signed a grant agreement for that grant and have not received the funds. Councilmember Nand asked if the funds could be applied toward CRP or TIF. Mr. Tatum answered that would need to be discussed with Snohomish County Councilmember Strom in a follow-up conversation with him based on tonight’s discussion. Councilmember Nand expressed support for allowing staff to continue this dialogue. Councilmember Dotsch recalled during the previous presentation regarding community renewal, the city council must pass a resolution that identifies a specific area for community renewal, adopt a finding of blight that applies to the area, and designate the City as a community renewal agency. Ms. McLaughlin responded that work has been completed in draft form. The area has been identified and how it meets the RCW criteria, and there are project recommendations which include establishing a community renewal agency to spearhead the tools available through community renewal. Councilmember Dotsch recalled a public hearing was also required. Ms. McLaughlin answered a public hearing by the city council would be part of a typical process. She anticipated staff would also provide another introduction of the subject to council. AMENDMENT FAILED (1-6), COUNCILMEMBER DOTSCH VOTING YES. COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TIBBOTT, TO AMEND BY STRIKING THE 6TH WHEREAS CLAUSE, “WHEREAS, THESE CIVIC INVESTMENT SHOULD BE ADDED TO THE CIP; AND” Council President Olson explained whereas clauses are intended to be retrospective, which this one is not, and for that reason it doesn’t belong and should be removed. Councilmember Tibbott supported the proposed amendment, advising he found the wording “these civic investments” too vague. When projects are added to the CIP, the council needs to know what they are; in the past the CIP has become bloated with projects the City does not intend to pursue. Item 9.3 Packet pg. 220/223 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes July 2, 2024 Page 17 Councilmember Paine did not support the amendment. Adding the CRP and the TIF to the CIP provides clear direction so staff can seek grants to support that work. Council President Olson commented there are several items on the extended planner regarding the CIP/CFP process and the CIP/CFP is also reviewed by the planning board. This amendment does not state it won’t be done, but it isn’t appropriate to include anything that is not context, background or retrospective or to make new commitments in a whereas clause. She had this conversation with the city attorney and he is attending the meeting virtually if there are any questions. Councilmember Tibbott expressed support for efforts related to the CRP and TIF, tools the City will eventually want to use and that he supported referencing in the resolution; however, they are not capital projects and he did not understand how they would be added to the CIP/CFP. Ms. McLaughlin said staff did not anticipate the CRP and the TIF would be items in the investment fund, it would be the establishment of a fund to leverage potential future land acquisition or identify potential infrastructure projects for capital investment in the future. The establishment of a fund would make the City more nimble as opportunities arise in the future. The intent is have funding available for infrastructure or land acquisition. Mr. Tatum commented if the whereas clause is eliminated, the intent is encapsulated in 2.D. Councilmember Nand said she was not particularly passionate about preserving the 6th whereas clause, but it can be important to leave breadcrumbs, context and hints for future councils and whoever succeeds Mr. Tatum and Ms. McLaughlin in the future to understand the context when the council decided to pass this resolution. From that perspective, the whereas serves as context regarding staff’s intent to establish a pool of funds through grant opportunities in the future. Councilmember Chen did not support the amendment. He preferred to retain this language to set a target. He drives, walks, or rides his bike by the public storage on a daily basis, a very attractive location for future consideration. Council President Olson commented future actions are not typically included a whereas clause. Councilmember Eck did not support the amendment. She understood Council President Olson’s point, but in this regard it makes sense to overstate the point. If the City is pulling out of the Landmark purchase and making a line in the sand to be committed, that cannot be overstated. AMENDMENT FAILED (3-4), COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON AND COUNCILMEMBERS TIBBOTT AND DOTSCH VOTING YES. COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TIBBOTT, TO AMEND THE 6TH WHEREAS CLAUSE TO READ, “WHEREAS THE COUNCIL INTENDS TO CONSIDER NEW ADDITIONS TO THE CIP TO SERVE THIS AREA; AND” Council President Olson said as it the whereas clause is currently worded, it states the council is on board for “these” civic investments, one of the civic investments was a community center. She suggested the mayor ask staff to do a real analysis of what if any impact the change of the Ballinger Center from a Mountlake Terrace focus to a catchment area focus will have on the need. She recognized that center is on border of the Edmonds but so was the Landmark site which was being considered for a community center. If the Ballinger Center is a place the City chooses to invest in and support, the City should look at the impact that has. When a community center came up in the PROS Plan, it was before the change to the Ballinger Center and all the discussions since then have not really included any analysis or consideration of whether that changes the need for a community center which includes a capital investment, facilities maintenance and staff, and if there is a better or more efficient way to provide that for residents in that area. Item 9.3 Packet pg. 221/223 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes July 2, 2024 Page 18 Council President Olson clarified she was not saying she didn’t want to make investments in that area; she has been on the record in numerous public meetings saying one of the reasons she was not wholly on board with the Landmark purchase was she felt the most important capital investment in that area was a park in the Gateway neighborhood where there is nothing within a mile walk. She was satisfied with stating investments, but did not want to specify “these” civic investments which included a community center until that is fully vetted. Councilmember Paine did not support the amendment, commenting it was totally appropriate to include the language in the whereas clause as it helps tell a story. This is not related to a project in Mountlake Terrace, it is related to future capital investment in the Highway 99 subarea or whatever that area ends up looking like under community renewal. The Ballinger Center in Mountlake Terrace is a nonprofit and a totally separate proposition. Edmonds needs to have community centers as they add value. Councilmember Tibbott expressed support for the amendment, the council will want to consider capital projects and it’s obvious the council is interested in capital projects as this has been discussed for over a year. He did not want to limit civic investments. Section 2.D already addresses the commitment to establishing a fund for new projects in the community renewal area. Councilmember Nand did not support the amendment. Whereas clauses are not legally operative, they are aspirational. Under the comprehensive plan, Highway 99 is planned to take on a lot of additional density; however, there are no community centers, arts and culture venues, or any public meeting space within easy walking distance of Highway 99. The council does not need to direct staff via a whereas clause to engage in an exercise to see whether a community center is needed on Highway 99. Whereas clauses are inspirational and provide guidance for future councils and administration; the City should seek community partnerships and include civic investments in the CIP. Councilmember Dotsch expressed support for the amendment, pointing out Section 2 addresses the intent for this area. She agreed with Councilmember Tibbott’s reasoning. With this amendment, the whereas clause still says the same thing, but is not as tightly worded as the existing language. AMENDMENT FAILED (3-4), COUNCILMEMBERS TIBBOTT AND DOTSCH AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON VOTING YES. MAIN MOTION CARRIED (6-1), COUNCILMEMBER PAINE VOTING NO. 9. COUNCIL COMMENTS Councilmember Nand thanked the Edmonds Chamber of Commerce very small staff for their hard work, commenting several months of work are about to meet fruition in the 4th of July parade. Mountlake Terrace will have a great fireworks show and she encouraged the public to let the professionals handle fireworks to ensure there are no more tragic fires. Sparklers are fun and not very lethal and she hoped people who wanted to celebrate the 4th of July with fireworks would confine themselves to sparkers and going to the professional shows which keep the community safe and respects veterans and others negatively impacted by illegal fireworks as well as pets and wildlife. Many wild birds are killed due to confusion and terror caused by fireworks. She suggested being be kinder to everyone and the environment by not setting off illegal fireworks. Councilmember Paine looked forward to the 4th of July parade and marching with advocates for the Edmonds Marsh and carrying the orca. She was hopeful this was not the last 4th of July considering the last week from SCOTUS. Item 9.3 Packet pg. 222/223 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes July 2, 2024 Page 19 Councilmember Dotsch gave a shout out to the Chamber for the reasons Councilmember Nand stated; they operate with a small crew and do an amazing job every year. She will be at the parade watching. She wished everyone a Happy Independence Day with their family and friends. Council President Olson said she loves the 4th of July, recalling a conversation in the context of Juneteenth that not everyone was free at the same time. She directed attention to the hope and promise of America and the fact that as a country, the United States falls forward to success. Mistakes have been made as a community and as a nation, but everyone tries to correct those mistakes, move forward and do better. She hoped everyone would take on the 4th of July celebration with that mindset and embrace it. The 4th of July is a joyous holiday in Edmonds and she hoped everyone enjoyed the Brackett Run and the parade. Councilmember Tibbott echoed the praise of the 4th of July and said he looked forward to it. Councilmember Chen wished everyone a happy, fun 4th of July hoping to see everyone at the parade, a must attend event. Councilmember Eck commented things are converging at her house in the next few days. In addition to celebrating the origins of the United States and exercising our rights, two days later her eldest is getting married. She is thinking a lot about joy, empathy for one another, and happiness in exercising their rights and liberties. She wished all a safe and happy 4th of July. 10. MAYOR'S COMMENTS Mayor Rosen relayed the 4th of July is about something took that place on that day 248 years ago. The 56 people who signed that document knew it could be a death warrant for them and for many of them it actually was. He relayed strong points in the document including that governments derive their just powers from the consent of those who are governed, we should be organized in a way that will most likely effect their safety and happiness. It started 248 years ago and now, because of those people, we have the privilege of living in this country and serving others as we also pursue assuring their safety and happiness. It is an honor to do that with council and the community. ADJOURNMENT With no further business, the Council meeting was adjourned at 9:40 pm. Item 9.3 Packet pg. 223/223