HomeMy WebLinkAbout2026-10-27 Council Packet Edmonds City Council Agenda
October 27, 2026
Posted: 10/23/2026 12:33 PM Page 1
Agenda
Edmonds City Council
Regular Meeting
Council Chambers
250 5TH AVE NORTH, EDMONDS, WA 98020
ZOOM: HTTPS://ZOOM.US/J/95798484261 PHONE: +1 253 215 8782 MEETING ID: 957 9848 4261
OCTOBER 27, 2026, 6:00 PM
1. CALL TO ORDER / FLAG SALUTE
2. LAND ACKNOWLEDGMENT
We acknowledge the original inhabitants of this place, the Sdohobsh (Snohomish)
people and their successors the Tulalip Tribes, who since time immemorial have
hunted, fished, gathered, and taken care of these lands. We respect their sovereignty,
their right to self-determination, and we honor their sacred spiritual connection with
the land and water.
3. ROLL CALL
4. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA
5. PRESENTATIONS
1. Proclamation of National Arts and Humanities Month Only One Reading Required –
Mayor's Office (5 minutes)
2. Park Impact Fee Study and Code Revision Presentation Second Reading – Parks and
Recreation (30 minutes)
3. Mayor’s Finance Update – Mayor’s Office (5 minutes)
6. AUDIENCE COMMENTS
This is an opportunity to comment regarding any matter not listed on the agenda
as closed record review or as a public hearing. Speakers are limited to three minutes.
Please state clearly your name and city of residence. If attending via Zoom, raise a
virtual hand to be recognized. If using a phone to dial in, press *9 to raise a hand.
When prompted, press *6 to unmute.
7. RECEIVED FOR FILING
1. Written Public Comments
Edmonds City Council Agenda
October 27, 2026
Posted: 10/23/2026 12:33 PM Page 2
2. Salary Commission Report
3. August 2026 Monthly Financial Report
8. APPROVAL OF THE CONSENT AGENDA
1. Approval of City Council Meeting Minutes Only One Reading Required
2. Approval of claim checks and wire payment. Only One Reading Required
3. Approval of payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire payments. Only
One Reading Required
4. Lien Placement #3 on Civic Park Property for Boys & Girls Club New Facility Second
Reading
5. Waterfront Buoy Permit Contract Amendment #1 Second Reading
6. ILA for Allied Law Enforcement Response Team (ALERT) cooperation Only One
Reading Required
7. WA Traffic Safety Commission Interagency Agreement Only One Reading Required
8. Washington Traffic Safety Commission DRE Memorandum of Understanding Only
One Reading Required
9. Approval of Amendment to Professional Services Agreement for Yost & Seaview
Reservoirs Project Second Reading
9. PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. Public Hearing for 2027 - 2032 Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) and Capital
Improvement Program (CIP) Second Reading – Public Works and Utilities (60
minutes)
2. 2027-2028 Proposed Biennium Budget Public Hearing Third Reading – Finance (60
minutes)
3. Public Hearing: Resolution expressing the Edmonds City Council's position on
Initiative Measure No. IL26-001 concerning parental rights relating to their
children in public school First Reading – City Council Office (30 minutes)
4. Public Hearing: Resolution expressing the Edmonds City Council's position on
Initiative Measure No. IL26-638 concerning participation in athletics at K-12
schools. First Reading – City Council Office (30 minutes)
Edmonds City Council Agenda
October 27, 2026
Posted: 10/23/2026 12:33 PM Page 3
10. COUNCIL BUSINESS
1. Resolution expressing the Edmonds City Council's position on Initiative Measure
No. IL26-001 concerning parental rights relating to their children in public school
Second Reading – City Council Office (20 minutes)
2. Resolution expressing the Edmonds City Council's position on Initiative Measure
No. IL26-638 concerning participation in athletics at K-12 schools Second Reading –
City Council Office (20 minutes)
11. COUNCIL COMMENTS
12. MAYOR'S COMMENTS
ADJOURNMENT
For disability accommodations, materials in alternate formats, accessibility information, or language interpretation/ translation needs,
please contact the City Clerk at 425-775-2525 at your earliest opportunity. Providing at least 72-hour notice will help ensure availability.
Agenda Item 5.1
Edmonds City Council
TITLE:Proclamation of National Arts and Humanities Month (Only One
Reading Required)
DEPARTMENT:Mayor's Office
PRESENTER:Mayor Rosen
NEEDED FROM COUNCIL:Informational
RECOMMENDATION:Mayor Rosen will proclaim October as National Arts and
Humanities Month.
BUDGET:
Total Dollar Amount:N/A ☐Approved in Budget
Fund(s):N/A ☐Budget Reallocation Required
☒No Budget Impact
PROBLEM/ISSUE STATEMENT:
N/A
CONTEXT, ANALYSIS, & ALTERNATIVES:
N/A
RECOMMENDATION:
Mayor Rosen will proclaim October as National Arts and Humanities Month.
BUDGET IMPACTS:
N/A
ITEM HISTORY:
N/A
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
The proclamation will be received by Richard Chung, Chair of the Edmonds Arts Commission
ATTACHMENTS:
Proclamation National Arts and Humanities Month
Packet pg. 4/524
IItteemm 55..11
Packet pg. 4/524
October 27, 2026
Regular Meeting
Item 5.1
Packet pg. 5/524
Item 5.1
Packet pg. 5/524
1
0
7
5
Agenda Item 5.2
Edmonds City Council
Regular Meeting
October 27, 2026
TITLE:Park Impact Fee Study and Code Revision Presentation (Second
Reading)
DEPARTMENT:Parks and Recreation
PRESENTER:Angie Feser, Director
NEEDED FROM COUNCIL:Input
RECOMMENDATION:Provide input on the proposed Park Impact Fee Study and
related Edmonds City Code revisions.
BUDGET:
Total Dollar Amount:Unknown ☐ Approved in Budget
Fund(s):N/A ☐ Budget Reallocation Required
☒ No Budget Impact
PROBLEM/ISSUE STATEMENT:
The City of Edmonds has two development impacts fees: one each related to parks and traffic
capital programs established in Edmonds City Code (ECC) 36.06. These fees are intended to
offset the impacts of new development on the city's park and transportation systems by
providing capital funding for improvements, expansion or new construction of park and street
facilities and infrastructure. The collected impact fees are restricted and cannot be used for
routine maintenance and operations. The fee charges are based on previously completed rate
studies.
In 2023 the State of Washington amended RCW 82.02 that now requires jurisdictions using
impact fees to adopt fees which produce proportionately lower impact fees for smaller housing
units. The options to calculate new residential housing fees include using square footage,
number of bedrooms or trips generated. To inform the updated city code and fee program, a
Park Impact Fee Study is being completed. This agenda item is a Council presentation of this
study and potential code revisions needed to reflect the new PIF calculation approach.
Staff is requesting Council provide input to the PIF Study and Edmonds City Code revisions
reflecting the changes to the fee calculation methodology and PIF fee. This feedback will be
taken into consideration for incorporation into the final draft to be brought back to council
during an upcoming Public Hearing and adoption consideration before end of year.
CONTEXT, ANALYSIS, & ALTERNATIVES:
If the new Park Impact Fee rates are not adopted and implemented, the City of Edmonds would
not be in compliance with State of Washington RCW 82.02.
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 6/524
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 6/524
1
0
7
5
RECOMMENDATION:
Provide input on the proposed Park Impact Fee Study and related Edmonds City Code revisions.
BUDGET IMPACTS:
No immediate budget impacts related to the introduction of the Park Impact Fee Study. Future
budget impacts would include the revenue generated by the estimated and collected Park
Impact Fees and how those fees are used in the Parks capital program.
ITEM HISTORY:
July 15, 2025: Interim Ordinance introduced to City Council
July 22, 2025: Interim Ordinance approved by City Council
August 19, 2025: City Council conducted Public Hearing on Interim Ordinance
April 7, 2026: City Council approved budget amendment for Park Impact Fee study update
funding
June 16, 2026: Interim Ordinance Extension presented to Council Parks & Public Works
Committee
June 23, 2026: Interim Ordinance Extension City Council Public Hearing
July 7, 2026: Interim Ordinance Extension City Council Regular Meeting
October 20, 2026: City Council Study Session, Park Impact Fee Study and Code Revision
Presentation
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
ATTACHMENTS:
Edmonds Park Impact Fee Rate Study Draft 2026.10.27
Edmonds Park Impact Fee Rate Study Draft 2026.10.27 Redline
Impact Fee Edits Edmonds City Code 2026.10.27
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 7/524
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 7/524
Edmonds Park Impact Fee
Study
October 2026
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 8/524
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 8/524
October 26, 2026 City of Edmonds | Park Impact Fee Study 2
2200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 1000
Seattle, Washington 98121
P (206) 324-8760
www.berkconsulting.com
“Helping Communities and Organizations Create Their Best Futures”
Founded in 1988, we are an interdisciplinary strategy and analysis firm providing integrated, creative
and analytically rigorous approaches to complex policy and planning decisions. Our team of strategic
planners, policy and financial analysts, economists, cartographers, information designers and facilitators
work together to bring new ideas, clarity, and robust frameworks to the development of analytically-
based and action-oriented plans.
Project Team
Kamal Raslan · Project Manager
Lisa Grueter – Principal in Charge
Katherine Goetz · Finance Lead
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 9/524
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 9/524
October 26, 2026 City of Edmonds | Park Impact Fee Study 3
Contents
Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................... 4
Purpose ......................................................................................................................................................... 4
Impact Fee Definitions .......................................................................................................................... 4
Requirements for Impact Fee Rate Calculation ............................................................................... 6
Fee Calculations ............................................................................................................................................. 7
Anticipated Growth ................................................................................................................................... 7
Residential: Population, Housing, and Household Size .................................................................. 7
Non-Residential: Employment ............................................................................................................. 8
Funding Other than Impact Fees ......................................................................................................... 12
PROS Plan Level of Service (LOS) Standards ..................................................................................... 12
Capital Facilities Plan Review ............................................................................................................... 16
Identified Capital Projects ................................................................................................................. 16
Future Need ............................................................................................................................................. 20
Per Capita System Value - Share of Need Measure ..................................................................... 20
Service Areas ............................................................................................................................................ 22
Unadjusted Rate Schedules – Capital Project Based ....................................................................... 22
Proportionate Share ................................................................................................................................ 26
Adjusted Rate Schedule ......................................................................................................................... 28
Appendix ....................................................................................................................................................... 30
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 10/524
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 10/524
October 26, 2026 City of Edmonds | Park Impact Fee Study 4
Introduction
Purpose
The City of Edmonds enacted park impact fees in 2013 to fund growth-driven capital needs in
parks, open space, and trails. The City Council established parks impact fees through Ordinance
3934, and the current rates were last updated in 2016. Rates may be reviewed and adjusted by
the Edmonds City Council as it deems necessary and appropriate per ECC 3.36.110. Since 2013,
the City has adopted two updated Parks, Recreation, and Open Space (PROS) Plans with the most
current in 2022. In addition, a new City Comprehensive Plan containing an updated Capital
Facilities Element was adopted in 2024. The PROS Plan and related Parks Capital Plan are
incorporated by reference in the Comprehensive Plan. These plans address growth over the
period of 2024-2044.
BERK consulting has prepared this rate study to address the City’s updated plans, help fulfill its
levels of service and investment program, and develop a residential and non-residential rate
schedule that is aligned with 2025 amendments to RCW 82.02.060 to account for the varied per-
capita impacts from different sized housing units (based on number of bedrooms) and
development types.
This study outlines the purpose and requirements for impact fees, documents the technical
assumptions and methodology for fee calculation, presents the findings from these calculations,
and includes an updated capital projects list.
Impact Fee Definitions
Statutory Creation
Impact fees authorized by the Growth Management Act are those fees charged by a local
government on new development to recover a portion of the cost of capital facility improvements
(called “system improvements” throughout the statute authorizing impact fees [RCW
82.02.090(9)]) needed to serve growth. The Washington State Legislature defined the intent of
local impact fees in RCW 82.02.050:
(1) It is the intent of the legislature:
(a) To ensure that adequate facilities are available to serve new growth and
development;
(b) To promote orderly growth and development by establishing standards by which
counties, cities, and towns may require, by ordinance, that new growth and
development pay a proportionate share of the cost of new facilities needed to serve
new growth and development; and
(c) To ensure that impact fees are imposed through established procedures and criteria
so that specific developments do not pay arbitrary fees or duplicative fees for the
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 11/524
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 11/524
October 26, 2026 City of Edmonds | Park Impact Fee Study 5
same impact.
(2) Counties, cities, and towns … are authorized to impose impact fees on development
activity as part of the financing for public facilities, provided that the financing for
system improvements to serve new development must provide for a balance between
impact fees and other sources of public funds and cannot rely solely on impact fees.
Impact fees may be charged to help pay for four categories of system improvements:
Public transportation and road facilities;
Fire protection facilities;
Schools; and
Public parks, open space, and recreation facilities.
Local governments are authorized to charge fees only for system improvements that are
reasonably related to the new development, do not exceed a proportionate share of the costs of
necessary system improvements, and are only used for system improvements that will reasonably
benefit the new development (see Project Eligibility below; RCW 82.02.050(3)). In addition to
restrictions on the types of projects eligible for impact fees, State law also requires that
jurisdictions’ “financing for system improvements to serve new development must provide for a
balance between impact fees and other sources of public funds” – i.e., impact fees cannot be the
sole source of funding for eligible system improvements.
According to the provisions of RCW 82.02.060, impact fees must be adjusted for other revenue
sources that are paid by development if such “payments are earmarked for or proratable to
particular system improvements.” Likewise, the City must provide impact fee credit if the
developer dedicates land or provides improvements identified in the City-adopted capital
facilities plan as a requirement for development approval. Collected impact fees may only be
spent on public facilities identified in a capital facilities plan and may only be spent on capital
costs; impact fees may not be used to pay for operating expenses or maintenance activities
(RCW82.02.050(4)).
Additionally, RCW 82.02.060(1) states that impact fees schedule “… shall reflect the
proportionate impact of new housing units, including multifamily and condominium units, based
on the square footage, number of bedrooms, or trips generated, in the housing unit in order to
produce a proportionally lower impact fee for smaller housing units…” In addition, ESSB 1337
(2023)1 provides that accessory dwelling units (ADUs) cannot be charged more than 50% of the
impact fee for the primary unit.
Potential Deficiencies
Based on RCW 82.02.050(4), the capital facilities plan must identify “[d]eficiencies in public
facilities serving existing development and the means by which existing deficiencies will be
eliminated within a reasonable period of time,” and must distinguish such deficiencies from
1 https://app.leg.wa.gov/rcw/default.aspx?cite=36.70A.681
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 12/524
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 12/524
October 26, 2026 City of Edmonds | Park Impact Fee Study 6
“[a]dditional demands placed on existing public facilities by new development.”
Deficiencies are determined by the level of service (LOS) standards that the City uses to measure
the impact created by growth. The City of Edmonds’ Comprehensive Plan Capital Facilities
Element adopts level of service standards listed in the 2022 Edmonds Parks Recreation and Open
Space Plan by reference (see PROS Plan Level of Service (LOS) Standards section). Population
and employment numbers are based on the 20-year Comprehensive Plan period of 2024 to 2044.
To operationalize the Capital Facilities Element, the City regularly updates and adopts a 6-year
Capital Facilities Plan (CFP); the CFP represents current capital activities and advances years of
applicability within the City’s 20-year planning period. As of the time of this study’s adoption, the
most recent CFP spans from 2027 to 2032.
Some of the projects in the CFP address existing deficiencies; only those portions of these
projects planned to accommodate future growth are considered in this study.
Project Eligibility
By law, impact fees can only be used for system improvements that benefit the new development
and relate to the demand from new development. To the extent these projects extend parks
capacity, the growth-related portion of capital project costs can be funded by impact fees. RCW
82.02.050(4) specifies that impact fees:
(a) Shall only be imposed for system improvements that are reasonably related to the
new development;
(b) Shall not exceed a proportionate share of the costs of system improvements that
are reasonably related to the new development; and
(c) Shall be used for system improvements that will reasonably benefit the new
development.
Examples of the types of park development and improvement projects that are growth-related
and impact-fee eligible include adding facilities at existing parks that increase capacity, such as
new and expanded parks, new sports fields, adding lighting to existing fields (to extend operable
hours), improving or creating paths and trails, replacing and expanding existing, outdated, and
underused equipment. A list of the specific projects that the City identified as necessary to
support growth is in the Identified Capital Projects section of this document.
Requirements for Impact Fee Rate Calculation
Impact fees must be assessed in accordance with the requirements of RCW 82.02 subsections
050 through 090. The schedule must be based on a formula or consistent method (RCW
82.02.060(1)). The fees must be adjusted for the share of future available funding sources. How
the proportionate share reduction is calculated is guided by RCW 82.02.060:
(1) …In determining proportionate share, the formula or other method of calculating impact
fees shall incorporate, among other things, the following:
(a) The cost of public facilities necessitated by new development;
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 13/524
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 13/524
October 26, 2026 City of Edmonds | Park Impact Fee Study 7
(b) An adjustment to the cost of the public facilities for past or future payments made or
reasonably anticipated to be made by new development to pay for particular system
improvements in the form of user fees, debt service payments, taxes, or other
payments earmarked for or proratable to the particular system improvement;
(c) The availability of other means of funding public facility improvements;
(d) The cost of existing public facilities improvements; and
(e) The methods by which public facilities improvements were financed.
See the following Fee Calculations for the method in accordance with RCW 82.02.060.
Fee Calculations
Anticipated Growth
Based on the 2027 to 2032 Capital Facilities Plan parks project list and demographic projections,
this study incorporates growth for the ten-year expenditure window for collected impact fees,
2027 through 2036.2
The City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan employment and household growth estimates for
2024 to 2044 were used as the baseline for this fee calculation. BERK also used past trends in
employees by sector, April 1st estimates of residential population, average household size, and
housing type data from the Office of Financial Management (OFM), U.S. Census Bureau’s
American Community Survey (ACS), and the Census Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics
dataset. BERK used either compound annual growth rate or share of employees by sector to
adapt the 2044 Comprehensive Plan growth estimates to the 6-year CFP timeline and 10-year
impact fee timeline. The estimates of number of employees by sector and square feet and
household size by number of bedrooms below.
Residential: Population, Housing, and Household Size
As part of the most recent Comprehensive Plan periodic update, Snohomish County provided the
City of Edmonds an allocation of households and employees to plan for between 2024 and 2044.
BERK calculated annual growth rates for the Edmonds residential population and housing units
using the compound annual growth rate to project from 2013 to 2023 OFM April 1st Population
Estimates and Housing Estimates for the City of Edmonds. The OFM housing estimates and data
from the U.S Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS)3 were used to determine the
share of growth by number of bedrooms in each dwelling unit.
2 RCW 82.02.070.
3 Based on a BERK calculation using data from ACS 2023 five-year estimates in Table B25010 "Average Household Size of
Occupied Housing Units by Tenure." And table B25041 "Bedrooms." To determine number of bedrooms in each block group in
Edmonds
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 14/524
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 14/524
October 26, 2026 City of Edmonds | Park Impact Fee Study 8
Exhibit 1 shows housing unit and residential population projections. This method assumes steady
growth, but the city will experience a different, and likely uneven, actual growth pattern as
projects are built during economic upturns and construction slows during recessions and
economic downturns.
Exhibit 1. Estimated and Projected Housing Units and Residential Population: 2023, 2027,
2032, 2036, and 2044
2023 Actuals 2027 Estimate
2032 Estimate
(CFP Period)
2036 Estimate
(Impact Fee Study
Period)
2044 Growth
Targets
(Comprehensive
Plan Period)
Housing
Units
19,599 20,223 22,220 23,920 28,073
Residential
Population
43,370 44,372 47,507 50,174 55,966
Sources: City of Edmonds, 2024; OFM, 2026; BERK, 2026.
Non-Residential: Employment
The City provided estimates for employment and square footage growth by building type in
Edmonds for 2023 to 2044, and assumptions of square feet per employee, by type. BERK
projected employment and non-residential square footage by type using a compound annual
growth rate for the impact fee period, shown below in Exhibit 2 and Exhibit 3.
Exhibit 2. Projected Employment (Jobs) by Type: 2023, 2027, 2032, 2036, and 2044 (Rounded)
NAICS Category 2023 Estimate 2027 Estimate
2032 Estimate
(CFP Period)
2036 Estimate
(Impact Fee
Study Period)
2044 Growth
Targets
(Comprehensive
Plan Period)
Construction/Resource 823 833 893 943 1,054
Manufacturing 138 131 141 148 166
WTU
(Warehousing,
Transportation,
Utilities)
636 497 533 563 629
Retail 1,903 1,971 2,112 2,232 2,492
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 15/524
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 15/524
October 26, 2026 City of Edmonds | Park Impact Fee Study 9
NAICS Category 2023 Estimate 2027 Estimate
2032 Estimate
(CFP Period)
2036 Estimate
(Impact Fee
Study Period)
2044 Growth
Targets
(Comprehensive
Plan Period)
FIRE
(Finance, Insurance,
Real Estate)
791 832 892 942 1,052
Services/Health
(exclude food service) 6,371 7,242 7,760 8,200 9,158
Government/Education 511 438 470 496 554
Restaurants 1,721 1,682 1,802 1,904 2,127
Total Jobs 12,894 13,626 14,600 15,430 17,232
Notes: FIRES indicates non-residential development in finance, insurance, and real estate. Employment estimates for 2026 were
provided by these types but do not include all employment categories.
Sources: Skagit County Council of Governments. 2024; BERK, 2026.
Exhibit 3. Projected Non-Residential Development by Type, 2023, 2027, 2032, 2036, and
2044 (Rounded)
Employment Type
Square Feet
per
Employee by
Type4
2023
Estimate
2027
Estimate
2032
Estimate
(CFP
Period)
2036
Estimate
(Impact Fee
Study
Period)
2044
Growth
Targets
(Comp.
Plan
Period)
Manufacturing 500 69,000 65,568 70,255 74,245 82,918
WTU
(Warehousing,
Transportation, Utilities)
1,000 636,000 497,426 532,986 563,256 629,051
Retail 700 1,332,100 1,379,503 1,478,122 1,562,070 1,744,539
FIRE
(Finance, Insurance, Real
Estate)
350 276,850 291,211 312,030 329,751 368,270
Services/Health
(exclude food service)
400 2,548,400 2,896,785 3,103,873 3,280,152 3,663,315
Government/Education 300 153,300 131,481 140,880 148,881 166,272
4 Pulled from 2021 Buildable Lands Report for Snohomish County
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 16/524
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 16/524
October 26, 2026 City of Edmonds | Park Impact Fee Study 10
Employment Type
Square Feet
per
Employee by
Type4
2023
Estimate
2027
Estimate
2032
Estimate
(CFP
Period)
2036
Estimate
(Impact Fee
Study
Period)
2044
Growth
Targets
(Comp.
Plan
Period)
Restaurants 200 344,200 336,323 360,366 380,832 425,318
Employment Sq. Feet - 5,359,850 5,598,297 5,998,512 6,339,188 7,079,683
Note: Employment categories like construction and resources do not have square footage per employee estimates in the
Snohomish County Buildable Lands Report as there are no physical locations associated with employees of those sectors.
Warehousing, storage, and management of construction and resource-based employees are captured in other employment and
commercial/industrial land use types. BERK is using the 2044 employment growth target as published in the Edmonds
Comprehensive Plan.
Sources: Edmonds Comprehensive Plan, 2024; Buildable Lands Report for Snohomish County, 2021; BERK, 2026.
Resident-Equivalent Employees
Employment growth can be linked to increased park usage by both the employees and non-
resident visitors to businesses in Edmonds. Multiple jurisdictions in Washington have attempted
to capture this increased usage resulting from growth by using the concept of resident-equivalent
employee population.5 Equivalent population estimates are based on quantifying the amount of
time that parks are available to each group. These estimates are not an estimate of usage, but of
possible usage given the periods that parks are open.
Based on hours of operation and U.S. Census Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics
(LEHD) data on employee location, BERK used an assumption that an employee can access City
parks 6.7% of the time a resident can access parks. Exhibit 4 and Exhibit 5 show employee
population, employment, and resident-equivalent employee estimates for the year 2023 (which
reflect the most up to date LEHD Origin-Destination data) which was then extrapolated to
estimate future resident-equivalent and service population.
5 Examples of other jurisdictions that have used resident-equivalent employe population include the cities of Issaquah,
Redmond, Edmonds, and Montlake Terrace.
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 17/524
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 17/524
October 26, 2026 City of Edmonds | Park Impact Fee Study 11
Exhibit 4. Projected Employment and Resident-Equivalent Employee Population
Living
inside
Edmonds
Living outside
Edmonds Total
Population Working inside Edmonds 1,382 11,512 12,894
Population Working outside Edmonds 17,667
Not working 24,321
Total 43,370
Hours per week residential demand
Working inside Edmonds 49*
Working outside Edmonds 44**
Not working 84
Hours per week non-residential demand
Working inside Edmonds (estimated 1 hour for lunch/after
work) 5.0 5.0
Total
Weekly
Residential
Hours
Total Weekly
Non-residential
hours
Total hours
Working inside Edmonds 67,718 57,560 125,278
Working outside Edmonds 777,348 777,348
Not working 2,042,964 2,042,964
Total 2,888,030 57,560 2,945,590
Hours per resident 66.59
Hours per employee
(adjusted for employees who live and work in Edmonds) 4.46
Employee to Resident Conversion Factor 6.70%
*12 hours open (average annual sunrise-sunset) less 8 hours working time, 5 days per week plus 12 hours on Saturday and
Sunday.
**Excludes “lunch break” hour where parks are available to those who live and work in Edmonds.
Sources: City of Edmonds, 2025; BERK, 2026; LEHD 2023.
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 18/524
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 18/524
October 26, 2026 City of Edmonds | Park Impact Fee Study 12
Exhibit 5. Projected Service Population, 2023, 2027, 2032, 2036, and 2044
2023 Actual 2027 Estimate
2032 Estimate
(CFP Period)
2036 Estimate
(Impact Fee Study
Period)
2044 Growth
Targets
(Comprehensive
Plan Period)
Residential
Population
43,370 44,372 47,507 50,174 55,966
Non-Resident
Employee
Population
11,512 11,989 12,846 13,576 15,162
Resident Equivalent
Employees (6.7%)
772 804 861 910 1,016
Total Service
Population
44,142 45,176 48,368 51,084 56,982
Sources: LEHD, 2023; OFM, 2026; BERK, 2026.
Funding Other than Impact Fees
BERK used historic actuals provided by the City to find the expected share of funding related to
growth – please see Proportionate Share section of this document.
PROS Plan Level of Service (LOS) Standards
To collect park impact fees, the City of Edmonds must identify parks facilities and services
necessary to support growth. By law, these projects must be listed in a CFP that includes the
impact fee time period (RCW 82.02.050(4)). The Growth Management Hearings Board concluded
in McVittie 1999 that local governments need a locally established minimum standard to provide
the basis for objective measurement of need for those projects necessary to support growth
(McVittie, 99-3-0016c, FDO, at 25), or a Level of Service (LOS) standard.
The 2022 PROS Plan includes a complex approach to levels of service:
Neighborhood, Community, and Open Space Parks: acres per 1,000 population – base level
4.22 acres per 1,000 (maintain current ratios) and target level of 6.75 acres per 1,000
(increase ratios if additional funding is available)
Waterfront Parks and Special Use: No acreage standard
Quality, Distribution (parks in a ½ mile), Usage: All Parks and Trails
Residents are a primary user of parks but businesses (employees/visitors) in the city use parks,
trails and recreation facilities and hold and attend community events in waterfront and special
use parks and are part of the usage service levels. Collectively, the City provides capacity for a
service population including residents and a share of employees.
Thus, this rate study addresses a service population, which includes residents and resident-
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 19/524
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 19/524
October 26, 2026 City of Edmonds | Park Impact Fee Study 13
equivalent employees.
BERK used the 2022 facility list and adopted acreage LOS standards from the Parks, Recreation,
and Open Space Plan to estimate 2027 and 2036 acreage demand as well as how much of the
demand can be attributed to growth rather than addressing existing facility deficits. An analysis
of the quantitative level of service and acreage demand are shown in Exhibit 6.
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 20/524
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 20/524
October 26, 2026 City of Edmonds | Park Impact Fee Study 14
Exhibit 6. Edmonds Parks Existing Acreage, Acreage LOS Standard, and Recommended additions for Service Population (2027)
Facility Type PROS 2022
LOS *
2022
PROS Plan
Existing
Acreage* 2027 LOS
Acreage*
2027
Additional
Acreage
Demand
2036 LOS
Recommended
Acreage (based
on PROS LOS)*
2036
Additional
Acreage
Demand
2036 Acreage
Responding to
Growth**
2036 Percent of
Total Acre
Acquisition -
Future Growth
Related***
Community Park 1.85 acres/ 1,000 79.2 82.1 2.9 94.7 15.5 12.6 81%
Neighborhood
Park
0.61 acre/1,000 26.2 27.1 0.9 31.2 5.0 4.2 83%
Open Space 1.76 acres/1,000 75.6 78.1 2.5 90.1 14.5 12.0 83%
Sources: City of Edmonds PROS Plan, 2022; BERK, 2026.
* Based on Existing LOS in PROS Plan not the Proposed LOS Standard
** Difference between 2027 and 2036 goal acreage based on population estimates and acreage level of service
*** Percent of acreage demand attributable to 2027 to 2036 growth only relative to existing LOS at time of PROS adoption
Exhibit 6 provides a quantifiable assessment of public park acreage in Edmonds. These measures of acreage exclude additional
recreation spaces within city limits including several acres of City-owned special use parks, Snohomish County-owned parks, or
Edmonds School District-owned playgrounds and fields that are all available to the public (some with restricted hours, e.g. schools)
and within city limits.
In addition to acreage standards, the City has adopted additional LOS standards (Exhibit 7) to provide a more holistic view of demand
for facilities over the planning period. The PROS plan has a qualitative LOS measurement that accounts for park quality as well as
facility distribution and usage. These standards are based on the Washington State Recreation and Conservation Office (RCO) letter
grading system with the most recent assessment from 2022 found below.
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 21/524
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 21/524
October 26, 2026 City of Edmonds | Park Impact Fee Study 15
Exhibit 7. Levels of Service with RCO Metric (System-wide)
Criteria Assessment Type Metric for Value Value LOS Grade
Quality Criteria Public Satisfaction Condition of Local City Parks
(rated as Excellent or Good)
76.10% B
Quality Criteria Public Satisfaction Condition of Trails in Parks
(rated as Excellent or Good)
55.00% D
Quality Criteria Agency-based Assessment Condition Assessment Rating of
Existing Parks (3-point scale)
1.27 B
Distribution Criteria* Parkland Access (within 1/2-mile traveled) Percent Service Area with
Access to Active-Use City Parks
48.10% D
Distribution Criteria* Parkland Access (within 1/2-mile traveled) Percent Service Area with
Access to All Parks & Open
Space
69.80% C
Distribution Criteria* Trail System Access (within 1/2-mile traveled) Percent Service Area with
Access to Recreational Trails
38.80% F
Usage / Visitation Criteria Frequency of Park or Trail Usage Percent Visiting Parks at Least
Multiple Times per Month
88.00% A
*Note: The percentage of land area covered by service area walksheds is a proxy for the population within the residential portion of the city.
Source: City of Edmonds PROS Plan, 2022 (p.72).
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 22/524
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 22/524
October 26, 2026 City of Edmonds | Park Impact Fee Study 16
Capital Facilities Plan Review
As part of the 2027-2032 Draft Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) & Capital Improvement Program
(CIP), the City of Edmonds Parks and Recreation Department has identified parks capital projects
that will be completed over the next 10 years. These projects include investments to support and
facilitate the increased usage of existing parks and recreation assets to meet growing demand, as
well as strategic expansions of the system as opportunities arise. The list of projects was assessed
based on the ability to accommodate future growth over the impact fee period based on a park’s
contributions to meeting the LOS standards described above.
Identified Capital Projects
As of the time of this study, the most recently adopted CFP covers the 2027 through 2032, and
this rate study identifies additional projects for the 2033 to 2036 time period since the City may
collect impact fees for a 10-year period. In addition to a description of each project, the CFP
contains the annual cost estimates adjusted for inflation (Exhibit 8) as well as anticipated funding
sources. The City and BERK aligned the project list with LOS standards and the proposal
description to identify the percent of each project associated with capacity to accommodate
2027 to 2036 growth. Exhibit 9 summarizes the overall cost of system improvements that are
attributable to growth and therefore impact fee eligible. Additional details on the percent
attributable to growth in the impact fee timeframe can be found in Exhibit 10. BERK calculated
the cost of projects attributable to growth to be $5.69 million for the 2027 to 2036 time period.
Key projects providing capacity as the community grows and that are designed to meet the
levels of service (base acres), quality, usage demand, or distribution include:
Playground Replacements #1 and #2: The portion of the replacements that expand
playgrounds beyond replacement add capacity.
Woodway Campus Athletic Complex - Phase I – Lighting: As part of a joint effort with the
School District, improvements would improve lighting and fields which increases capacity
for practice and games in an area of the City lacking public parkland.
Neighborhood Park - HWY 99 and SE Edmonds: Adds park acres and addresses distribution
level of service
Yost Park Expansion and Improvement (via Johnson Property)
Pine Street Park Improvements: new picnic and pathways added to the site increase
capacity and address the City’s quality level of service
The City will regularly review its CFP/CIP and periodically review its impact fee basis. Other
projects identified over the next 10 years may also be eligible for impact fees when they meet
level of service and add capacity to meet growth and demand for the City’s service population.
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 23/524
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 23/524
October 26, 2026 City of Edmonds | Park Impact Fee Study 17
Exhibit 8. Parks Capital Project List and Anticipated Funding Year, 2027 to 2036
Project List 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 - 2036 Total
Shell Creek Restoration $240,000 $200,000 $180,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $620,000
Playground Replacement #1 $0 $50,000 $350,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $400,000
Woodway Campus Athletic Complex - Phase I -
Lighting
$0 $0 $1,500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,500,000
Marsh Boardwalk Replacement $0 $0 $25,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $25,000
Playground Replacement #2 $0 $0 $50,000 $350,000 $0 $0 $0 $400,000
Neighborhood Park - HWY 99 Acquisition $0 $0 $0 $900,000 $0 $0 $0 $900,000
Neighborhood Park - HWY 99 Development $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $850,000 $0 $950,000
Johnson Property $0 $0 $0 $0 $50,000 $0 $300,000 $350,000
Neighborhood Park - SE 2 Acquisition $0 $0 $0 $0 $700,000 $0 $0 $700,000
Neighborhood Park - SE 2 Development $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $850,000 $950,000
Yost Pool Renovations and Upgrades $0 $120,000 $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $370,000
Pool Replacement $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $30,000,000 $0 $30,000,000
Parks & Facilities Maintenance and Operations
Building
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Edmonds Marsh Estuary Restoration (Willow
Creek Daylighting)
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,000,000 $10,000,000
Pine Street Park Improvements $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $225,000 $225,000
Total $240,000 $370,000 $2,355,000 $1,250,000 $850,000 $30,950,000 $11,375,000 $47,390,000
Sources: Edmonds 2027 to 2032 Capital Facilities Plan; BERK, 2026.
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 24/524
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 24/524
October 26, 2026 City of Edmonds | Park Impact Fee Study 18
Exhibit 9. Impact Fee Eligible System Improvement Projects, 2027 to 2032
Number of Improvement
Projects Total Future Project Cost
Total Identified Capital
Need from Growth
Percent of Cost Growth-
Related
Impact Fee Eligible Projects listed in
CFP
9 $6,375,000 $5,687,500 89.22%
Impact Fee Ineligible Projects listed in
CFP
5 $41,015,000 $0 0%
Total 14 $47,390,000 $5,687,500 12.00%
Sources: Edmonds 2027 to 2032 Capital Facilities Plan; EPRD/BERK work session, 08/2026; BERK, 2026.
Exhibit 10. Parks Attributable to Growth Capital Project List, Total Anticipated Cost Attributable to Growth, 2027 to 2036
Project Description
Total
Anticipated
Cost
% Related to
2027 to 2036
Growth*
$ Related to 2027 to
2036 Growth*
Shell Creek Restoration
Phase 1 & 2 *carryforward*
Planning, design (phase 1), and renovation (phase 2). Project to
provide improved environmental health and erosion control of Shell
Creek in Yost Park, may include trail, bridge and boardwalk repair or
relocation.
$620,000 0% $0
Playground Replacement #1 Replacement of aging playground and related improvements to
improve ADA compliance. $400,000 75% $300,000
Woodway Campus Athletic
Complex - Phase I - Lighting
In cooperation with the Edmonds School District, complete a
community park and athletic complex at Former Woodway High
School to include lighting and future construction of two additional
fields.
$1,500,000 75% $1,125,000
Marsh Boardwalk
Replacement
Assessment of northwest Edmonds Marsh boardwalk for possible
replacement. $25,000 0% $0
Playground Replacement #2 Replacement of aging playground and related improvements to
improve ADA compliance. $400,000 75% $300,000
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 25/524
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 25/524
October 26, 2026 City of Edmonds | Park Impact Fee Study 19
Project Description
Total
Anticipated
Cost
% Related to
2027 to 2036
Growth*
$ Related to 2027 to
2036 Growth*
Neighborhood Park - HWY
99
Acquisition of a new neighborhood park near SR 99. $900,000 100% $900,000
Neighborhood Park - HWY
99
Master plan and development of a new neighborhood park near SR
99. $950,000 100% $950,000
Johnson Property Master plan for future use and expansion of Yost Park. Site
development not included in estimate. $350,000 100% $350,000
Neighborhood Park - SE 2 Acquisition of new neighborhood park in Southeast Edmonds $700,000 100% $700,000
Neighborhood Park - SE 2 Master plan and development of a new neighborhood park in
Southeast Edmonds. $950,000 100% $950,000
Yost Pool Renovations and
Upgrades
Planning Year 1/improvements Year 2 - 3 (grant dependent in Y1) $370,000 0% $0
Pool Replacement Replacement of the existing Yost pool due to end of life cycle.
Consideration of possible partnerships with design, location, and
funding TBD.
$30,000,000 0% $0
Parks & Facilities
Maintenance and Operations
Building
Replace and/or renovate Parks & Facilities Maintenance Shop
located in City Park. Phase 1 - feasibility study. $0 0% $0
Edmonds Marsh Estuary
Restoration (Willow Creek
Daylighting)
Acquisition, Master Plan development and implementation of the
Edmonds Marsh to daylight the waterway connection of Puget
Sound to the Edmonds Marsh and two freshwater creeks providing
restoration of freshwater/saltwater estuary and natural tidal
exchange.
$10,000,000 0% $0
Pine Street Park
Improvements
New shelter, pathway, picnic tables, and trees (design and
installation) $225,000 50% $112,500
Total $47,390,000 12.00% $5,687,500**
* Based on Edmonds Parks and Recreation Department/BERK work sessions, 08/2026. 09/2026, and 10/2026
**This is compared with the per capita system value below. The lesser of the per capita capacity-building project costs or per capita system value investment is used in fees.
Sources: Edmonds 2027 to 2032 Capital Facilities Plan; BERK, 2026.
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 26/524
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 26/524
October 26, 2026 City of Edmonds | Park Impact Fee Study 20
Future Need
The City’s financial need related to parks growth is the lesser of two numbers:
1.Facility LOS Standards needs per capita: The future needs identified by the lesser of the
levels of service identified in Exhibit 6.
2.Growth-related project cost per capita: The capital projects that the City has identified.
Any given LOS standard may suggest that the City will need to invest in capital projects at a
level that is not physically or financially possible. For example, the City’s parks facilities-based
LOS standard may suggest a necessary investment in an area where there is no land available.
Exhibit 11 compares the expected per capita share of capital need using the facility LOS service
standard and the planned capital projects that the City has identified.
A secondary approach to determine the per capita share of capital need is to calculate the current
system value, dividing it by current service population to determine the current rate of per capita
investment in parks system. This is summarized below in Exhibit 12 and Exhibit 13.
The per capita investment approach acts as the upper bound of per capita need and the capital
project-based need is compared to this value and if it is higher, the lesser of the two values is
used in the rates. The final per capita share of capital need based on growth-related capital
projects is used in the impact fee calculations as this value is the lower of the two. This is
described in the next section below.
Should the City amend its Capital Facilities Plan in the future with additional capacity projects
and increase the per capita share of capital need but still remain consistent with or below the
system value per capita amount, it can revise the park impact fee rates accordingly.
Exhibit 11. Parks Future Needs Identified by Identified Growth-Related Capital Projects
New Resident Population, 2027 to 2036 5,803
New Employee Population, 2027 to 2036 1,803
New Resident-Equivalent Employees, 2027 to 2036 (6.7%) 106
New Service Population, 2027 to 2036 5,909
Identified Capital Need from Growth, 2027 to 2036 $5,687,500
Per Capita (Resident) Share of Capital Need (2027 to 2036) $980.10
Sources: City of Edmonds, 2026; LEHD, 2023; OFM, 2026; BERK, 2026.
Per Capita System Value - Share of Need Measure
The secondary way to determine per capita share of need is based on existing value of
Edmonds Park properties and facilities. The current value of the City’s park system was
determined by the Washington Cities Insurance Authority (WCIA) in a report retrieved on
January 26, 2026. This report outlines the value of the parks facilities, buildings, structures,
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 27/524
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 27/524
October 26, 2026 City of Edmonds | Park Impact Fee Study 21
infrastructure, and improvements including a total of $50.8M, without discounts for
depreciation. The report also includes land values which BERK found to be inconsistent with
the market value of the land and therefore an unreliable metric of system value. The land value
of parks is instead based on the 2026 Snohomish County Assessor’s assessed land value. BERK
used the current cost of the system from these two sources and divided by the current service
population to determine the average per capita investment in the parks system.
System Value of Parks System
Data from WCIA and the Assessor was used to estimate the total system value of the Edmonds
parks system, which estimated to be $117.4 million. A comparison of the system value using
WCIA improvements and land values ($50.9 million) versus using WCIA improvements value
and Snohomish County Assessor’s land value ($117.4 million) is shown in Exhibit 12. The per
capita value of the City’s park system value was calculated by dividing the system value in
$2026 by the city’s current service population which combines residents with resident
equivalent employees (REE). The full comparison and final per capita investment amount is
summarized in Exhibit 12.
Additional value needed based on the service population growth over the impact fee period can
be found in Exhibit 13.
Exhibit 12. System Value of Park System and Per Capita Investment
Category
WCIA-Only System
Value
$2026 (rounded)
WCIA System
Value + Assessor
Land Values
$2026 (rounded)
Resident
Only REE
Service
Population
2026 Estimated Population 43,770 793 44,563
Land Value $15,060,587 $81,592,800
Building Value $1,545,347 $1,545,347
Equipment Value $214,541 $214,541
Improvement Value $32,354,734 $32,354,734
Infrastructure Value $1,713,505 $1,713,505
Current Estimated Total
System Value
$50,888,716
(value not in use)
$117,420,928
(value in use)
2026 Park System
Investment Per Capita
Service Population
$2,634.96
Source: BERK, 2026.
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 28/524
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 28/524
October 26, 2026 City of Edmonds | Park Impact Fee Study 22
Exhibit 13. Additional Park System Investment Needed to Accommodate Growth
New Resident Population, 2027 to 2036 5,803
New Employee Population, 2027 to 2036 1,803
New Resident-Equivalent Employees, 2027 to 2036 (6.7%) 106
New Service Population, 2027 to 2036 5,909
Per Capita Need based on 2026 Per Capita Investment $2,634.96
Additional Value Needed, 2027 to 2036 (Service Population) $15,569,498
Source: BERK, 2026.
Service Areas
Since the City of Edmonds only has the authority to set impact fees on residential and non-
residential developments within city limits, this rate study uses OFM-provided city limit
residential population estimates and LEHD-based employee population, scaling for resident-
equivalent employees to extrapolate the service population.
Unadjusted Rate Schedules – Capital Project Based
BERK found the expected fee by development type before adjusting for the expected
proportionate share. BERK calculated fees depending upon the development type are as
follows:
Residential – based on number of bedrooms
Non-Residential: Warehousing, Transportation, Utilities (WTU)
Non-Residential: Manufacturing
Non-Residential: Finance, Insurance, Real Estate (FIRE)
Non-Residential: Services and Health (excludes restaurants)
Non-Residential: Restaurants
Non-Residential: Government and Education
For residential development, impact fees are charged per dwelling unit based on the number of
bedrooms in the unit. To connect residential units, bedrooms, and resident population per unit,
this study used information from the U.S. Census Bureau’s ACS 5-Year Estimates at the Census
Block Group Level. The Appendix shows the calculations and methodology used to determine
residential impact fees by bedroom number. The results are listed below in Exhibit 14.
For impact fees collected on non-residential developments, fees are charged per 1,000 gross
square feet of development. The unadjusted rates are as shown in Exhibit 15 and Exhibit 16.
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 29/524
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 29/524
October 26, 2026 City of Edmonds | Park Impact Fee Study 23
Exhibit 14. Population Per Household Estimates by Number of Bedrooms in Edmonds
Number of Bedrooms*
Average household Population
= .4068 X bedroom number + 1.129
0 1.13
1 1.54
2 1.94
3 2.35
4 2.76
5+ 3.16
*ADUs cannot be charged more than 50% of the impact fee for the primary unit. Sources: ACS, 2024; BERK, 2026.
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 30/524
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 30/524
October 26, 2026 City of Edmonds | Park Impact Fee Study 24
Exhibit 15. Unadjusted Residential Rate Schedules for Parks by Development Type
Residential Units by Bedroom number 0 1 2 3 4 5+ Total
Growth in Resident Population, 2027 to 2036 5,803
Identified Service Area Capital Need from Growth
(Projects), 2027 to 2036
$5,687,500
Per Capita Share of Capital Need, 2027 to 2036 $980.10
Estimated Number of Residents per Unit 1.13 1.54 1.94 2.35 2.76 3.16
Unadjusted Park Impact Fee: Cost per bedroom in
Primary Dwelling Unit
$1,106.53 $1,505.23 $1,903.94 $2,302.64 $2,701.34 $3,100.05
Unadjusted Park Impact Fee: Cost per bedroom in
Accessory Dwelling Unit
$553.26 $752.62 $951.97 $1,151.32 $1,350.67 $1,550.02
Source: BERK, 2026.
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 31/524
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 31/524
October 26, 2026 City of Edmonds | Park Impact Fee Study 25
Exhibit 16. Unadjusted Non-Residential Rate Schedules for Parks by Development Type
Manufacturing
WTU
(Warehousing,
Transportation,
Utilities)
Retail
FIRE
(Finance,
Insurance,
Real Estate)
Services/Health
(exclude food
service)
Government
/Education Restaurants Total
Growth in Estimated Built Square Feet,
2027 to 2036 8,677 65,830 182,567 38,540 383,367 17,400 44,510 740,891
Identified Service Area Capital Need from
Growth (Projects)
$5,687,500
Per Capita Share of Capital Need
2027 to 2036
(Resident Equivalent Employees)
$65.70
Estimated Number of Employees per 1,000
Sq. Ft
2.00 1.00 1.43 2.86 2.50 3.33 5.00
Unadjusted Park Impact Fee: Cost per 1,000
Gross Square Feet
$131.41 $65.70 $93.86 $187.72 $164.26 $219.01 $328.52
Source: BERK, 2026.
These schedules represent intermediary steps to a final rate schedule; each must be adjusted for the expected proportion of other
non-impact fee future funding contributed by growth.
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 32/524
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 32/524
October 26, 2026 City of Edmonds | Park Impact Fee Study 26
Proportionate Share
As required RCW 82.02.030(1), BERK calculated the proportionate share of future payments
reasonably anticipated to be made by new development users in the form of fees, debt service
payments, taxes, and other payments specific to the identified public facilities.
Aside from parks impact fees, the City uses grants, contributions, and Real Estate Excise Taxes
(REET) to fund park capital projects. Exhibit 17 shows the amount of parks capital REET
expenditures that Edmonds has spent and is expected to spend over the time period. From 2015
to 2025, these are actual expenditures; for 2026 to 2045, BERK projected these expenditures
into the future.
Exhibit 17. Parks REET Expenditures: Actual and Projected, $2026
Sources: City of Edmonds, 2026; Edmonds Budget, 2026; BERK, 2026.
$0
$500,000
$1,000,000
$1,500,000
$2,000,000
$2,500,000
$3,000,000
REET Expenditures (2026$)
Projected Actual
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 33/524
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 33/524
October 26, 2026 City of Edmonds | Park Impact Fee Study 27
To project REET expenditures, BERK evaluated data shared from the City of Edmonds 2015 to
2025. These expenditures were inflation-adjusted to 2026 dollars using the U.S. City Average
All Urban Consumer Price Index. REET expenditures were finally converted into per capita
estimates for consistency with this study’s growth projection methodology.
The City identified the annual amount of REET expected to be used for each park capital project.
For simplicity and transparency, BERK used the portion of new service population as a rough
indicator of the portion of REET from new growth. Exhibit 18 shows these calculations used to
find the average per capita REET expenditures expected to be used for park capital projects
stemming from growth.
Exhibit 18. Proportionate Share of Expected REET Expenditures, $2026
Year
Expected REET
Expenditures for
Park Capital
Projects
Estimated Total
Service
Population
Additional
Service
Population Since
2026
Percent of
Service
Population from
Growth
Estimated Portion of Park
Capital REET from Growth
Per Capita Park
Capital REET
from Growth
2027 $1,114,627.34 45,176 613 1.4% $15,120.16 $24.67
2028 $1,136,919.89 45,797 1,234 2.7% $30,635.92 $24.83
2029 $1,159,658.29 46,427 1,864 4.0% $46,555.76 $24.98
2030 $1,182,851.45 47,065 2,502 5.3% $62,888.35 $25.13
2031 $1,206,508.48 47,712 3,150 6.6% $79,642.51 $25.29
2032 $1,230,638.65 48,368 3,806 7.9% $96,827.27 $25.44
2033 $1,255,251.43 49,034 4,471 9.1% $114,451.82 $25.60
2034 $1,280,356.45 49,708 5,145 10.4% $132,525.56 $25.76
2035 $1,305,963.58 50,391 5,829 11.6% $151,058.06 $25.92
2036 $1,332,082.86 51,084 6,522 12.8% $170,059.11 $26.08
Average Per Capita Park Capita Expected REET Expenditures from Growth $25.37
Note: All amounts shown in 2026 dollars.
Sources: City of Edmonds, 2026; BERK, 2026.
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 34/524
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 34/524
October 26, 2026 City of Edmonds | Park Impact Fee Study 28
Adjusted Rate Schedule
BERK deducted the proportionate share REET expenditure estimates in the unadjusted rates to create adjusted rate schedules.
These rate schedules represent the final rate study calculation of suggested impact fee rates. The adjusted rate schedules are
presented in Exhibit 19 and Exhibit 20.
Exhibit 19. Adjusted Residential Rate Schedules for Parks by Development Type
Residential Units by Bedroom number 0 1 2 3 4 5+ Total
Growth in Resident Population, 2027 to 2036 5,803
Identified Service Area Capital Need from Growth (CFP
Projects)
$5,687,500
Per Capita Share of Capital Need 2027-2036 $980.10
Estimated Number of Residents per Unit 1.13 1.54 1.94 2.35 2.76 3.16
Unadjusted Park Impact Fee: Cost per Primary Unit $1,106.53 $1,505.23 $1,903.94 $2,302.64 $2,701.34 $3,100.05
Unadjusted Park Impact Fee: Cost per Accessory Unit $553.26 $752.62 $951.97 $1,151.32 $1,350.67 $1,550.02
Expected Parks Capital REET Expenditures per Capita $25.37
Expected IF Revenue per Unit $28.64 $38.96 $49.28 $59.60 $69.92 $80.24
Adjusted Park Impact Fee: Cost per bedroom in Primary
Dwelling Unit
$1,077.89 $1,466.27 $1,854.65 $2,243.04 $2,631.42 $3,019.80
Adjusted Park Impact Fee: Cost per bedroom in Accessory
Dwelling Unit
$538.94 $733.14 $927.33 $1,121.52 $1,315.71 $1,509.90
Source: BERK, 2026.
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 35/524
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 35/524
October 26, 2026 City of Edmonds | Park Impact Fee Study 29
Exhibit 20. Adjusted Non-Residential Rate Schedules for Parks by Development Type
Manufacturing
WTU
(Warehousing,
Transportation,
Utilities)
Retail
FIRE (Finance,
Insurance, Real
Estate)
Services/Health
(exclude food
service)
Government
/Education Restaurants Total
Growth in Estimated Built Square Feet,
2027 to 2036
8,677 65,830 182,567 38,540 383,367 17,400 44,510 740,891
Identified Service Area Capital Need from
Growth (Projects)
$5,687,500
Per Capita Share of Capital Need
2027 to 2036
(Resident Equivalent Employee)
$65.70
Estimated Number of Employees per
1,000 Sq. Ft
2.00 1.00 1.43 2.86 2.50 3.33 5.00
Unadjusted Park Impact Fee: Cost per
1,000 Gross Square Feet
$131.41 $65.70 $93.86 $187.72 $164.26 $219.01 $328.52
Expected Parks Capital REET
Expenditures per Capita (Resident
Equivalent Employee)
$1.70
Expected REET Revenue per 1,000 Gross
Square Feet
$3.40 $1.70 $2.43 $4.86 $4.25 $5.67 $8.50
Adjusted Park Impact Fee Rates per
1,000 Gross Square Feet
$128.01 $64.00 $91.43 $182.87 $160.01 $213.34 $320.01
Source: BERK, 2026.
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 36/524
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 36/524
October 26, 2026 City of Edmonds | Park Impact Fee Study 30
Appendix
This appendix includes the calculations and methodology used to determine average household
size by resident population and number of bedrooms in Edmonds.
Exhibit 21. Average Household Size by Population and Number of Bedrooms in Edmonds
Census Tract Block Group
Average
bedrooms
Average pop per
household
502 1 3.72 2.86
502 2 3.58 2.99
502 3 3.58 2.29
503 1 3.63 2.86
503 2 3.18 2.73
503 3 3.92 2.1
504.02 1 1.59 2.27
504.02 2 2.48 2.14
504.02 3 3.22 2.48
504.02 4 2.82 2.15
504.03 1 3.57 2.72
504.03 2 2.70 2.1
504.03 3 3.48 2.52
504.04 1 3.08 2.75
504.04 2 2.85 2.12
504.04 3 2.08 1.77
505.01 1 2.30 1.69
505.01 2 1.82 1.42
505.01 3 1.83 1.62
505.02 1 3.80 2.53
505.02 2 2.77 1.9
505.02 3 3.02 2.23
507 1 2.96 2.42
507 2 2.73 2.14
507 3 3.46 2.26
507 4 2.47 2.14
507 5 2.53 2.39
508 2 2.30 2.32
508 3 2.80 2.4
508 4 3.55 2.74
509 1 1.97 2.01
509 2 2.96 2.55
515 3 2.24 2.28
Sources: ACS, 2023; BERK, 2026.
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 37/524
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 37/524
October 26, 2026 City of Edmonds | Park Impact Fee Study 31
Exhibit 22. Average Household Size Trend by Number of Bedrooms in Edmonds
Sources: ACS, 2024; BERK, 2026.
y = 0.4068x + 1.129
R² = 0.4845
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50
Average population per
household
Average number of bedrooms
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 38/524
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 38/524
Edmonds Park Impact Fee
Study
October 2026
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 39/524
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 39/524
October 26, 2026 City of Edmonds | Park Impact Fee Study 2
2200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 1000
Seattle, Washington 98121
P (206) 324-8760
www.berkconsulting.com
“Helping Communities and Organizations Create Their Best Futures”
Founded in 1988, we are an interdisciplinary strategy and analysis firm providing integrated, creative
and analytically rigorous approaches to complex policy and planning decisions. Our team of strategic
planners, policy and financial analysts, economists, cartographers, information designers and facilitators
work together to bring new ideas, clarity, and robust frameworks to the development of analytically-
based and action-oriented plans.
Project Team
Kamal Raslan · Project Manager
Lisa Grueter – Principal in Charge
Katherine Goetz · Finance Lead
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 40/524
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 40/524
October 26, 2026 City of Edmonds | Park Impact Fee Study 3
Contents
Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................... 4
Purpose ......................................................................................................................................................... 4
Impact Fee Definitions .......................................................................................................................... 4
Requirements for Impact Fee Rate Calculation ............................................................................... 6
Fee Calculations ............................................................................................................................................. 7
Anticipated Growth ................................................................................................................................... 7
Residential: Population, Housing, and Household Size .................................................................. 7
Non-Residential: Employment ............................................................................................................. 8
Funding Other than Impact Fees ......................................................................................................... 12
PROS Plan Level of Service (LOS) Standards ..................................................................................... 12
Capital Facilities Plan Review ............................................................................................................... 16
Identified Capital Projects ................................................................................................................. 16
Future Need ............................................................................................................................................. 20
Per Capita System Value - Share of Need Measure ..................................................................... 20
Service Areas ............................................................................................................................................ 22
Unadjusted Rate Schedules – Capital Project Based ....................................................................... 23
Proportionate Share ................................................................................................................................ 26
Adjusted Rate Schedule ......................................................................................................................... 28
Appendix ....................................................................................................................................................... 30
Note: table of contents is dynamic text and will reflect the page numbers in this document rather than aligning directly with the clean version of this document.
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 41/524
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 41/524
October 26, 2026 City of Edmonds | Park Impact Fee Study 4
Introduction
Purpose
The City of Edmonds enacted park impact fees in 2013 to fund growth-driven capital needs in
parks, open space, and trails. The City Council established parks impact fees through Ordinance
3934, and the current rates were last updated in 2016. Rates may be reviewed and adjusted by
the Edmonds City Council as it deems necessary and appropriate per ECC 3.36.110. Since 2013,
the City has adopted two updated Parks, Recreation, and Open Space (PROS) Plans with the most
current in 2022. In addition, a new City Comprehensive Plan containing an updated Capital
Facilities Element was adopted in 2024. The PROS Plan and related Parks Capital Plan are
incorporated by reference in the Comprehensive Plan. These plans address growth over the
period of 2024-2044.
BERK consulting has prepared this rate study to address the City’s updated plans, help fulfill its
levels of service and investment program, and develop a residential and non-residential rate
schedule that is aligned with 2025 amendments to RCW 82.02.060 to account for the varied per-
capita impacts from different sized housing units (based on number of bedrooms) and
development types.
This study outlines the purpose and requirements for impact fees, documents the technical
assumptions and methodology for fee calculation, presents the findings from these calculations,
and includes an updated capital projects list.
Impact Fee Definitions
Statutory Creation
Impact fees authorized by the Growth Management Act are those fees charged by a local
government on new development to recover a portion of the cost of capital facility improvements
(called “system improvements” throughout the statute authorizing impact fees [RCW
82.02.090(9)]) needed to serve growth. The Washington State Legislature defined the intent of
local impact fees in RCW 82.02.050:
(1) It is the intent of the legislature:
(a) To ensure that adequate facilities are available to serve new growth and
development;
(b) To promote orderly growth and development by establishing standards by which
counties, cities, and towns may require, by ordinance, that new growth and
development pay a proportionate share of the cost of new facilities needed to serve
new growth and development; and
(c) To ensure that impact fees are imposed through established procedures and criteria
so that specific developments do not pay arbitrary fees or duplicative fees for the
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 42/524
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 42/524
October 26, 2026 City of Edmonds | Park Impact Fee Study 5
same impact.
(2) Counties, cities, and towns … are authorized to impose impact fees on development
activity as part of the financing for public facilities, provided that the financing for
system improvements to serve new development must provide for a balance between
impact fees and other sources of public funds and cannot rely solely on impact fees.
Impact fees may be charged to help pay for four categories of system improvements:
Public transportation and road facilities;
Fire protection facilities;
Schools; and
Public parks, open space, and recreation facilities.
Local governments are authorized to charge fees only for system improvements that are
reasonably related to the new development, do not exceed a proportionate share of the costs of
necessary system improvements, and are only used for system improvements that will reasonably
benefit the new development (see Project Eligibility below; RCW 82.02.050(3)). In addition to
restrictions on the types of projects eligible for impact fees, State law also requires that
jurisdictions’ “financing for system improvements to serve new development must provide for a
balance between impact fees and other sources of public funds” – i.e., impact fees cannot be the
sole source of funding for eligible system improvements.
According to the provisions of RCW 82.02.060, impact fees must be adjusted for other revenue
sources that are paid by development, ifdevelopment if such “payments are earmarked for or
proratable to particular system improvements.” Likewise, the City must provide impact fee credit
if the developer dedicates land or provides improvements identified in the City-adopted capital
facilities plan as a requirement for development approval. Collected impact fees may only be
spent on public facilities identified in a capital facilities plan and may only be spent on capital
costs; impact fees may not be used to pay for operating expenses or maintenance activities
(RCW82.02.050(4)).
Additionally, RCW 82.02.060(1) states that impact fees schedule “… shall reflect the
proportionate impact of new housing units, including multifamily and condominium units, based
on the square footage, number of bedrooms, or trips generated, in the housing unit in order to
produce a proportionally lower impact fee for smaller housing units…” In addition, ESSB 1337
(2023)1 provides that accessory dwelling units (ADUs) cannot be charged more than 50% of the
impact fee for the primary unit.
Potential Deficiencies
Based on RCW 82.02.050(4), the capital facilities plan must identify “[d]eficiencies in public
facilities serving existing development and the means by which existing deficiencies will be
eliminated within a reasonable period of time,” and must distinguish such deficiencies from
1 https://app.leg.wa.gov/rcw/default.aspx?cite=36.70A.681
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 43/524
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 43/524
October 26, 2026 City of Edmonds | Park Impact Fee Study 6
“[a]dditional demands placed on existing public facilities by new development.”
Deficiencies are determined by the level of service (LOS) standards that the City uses to measure
the impact created by growth. The City of Edmonds’ Comprehensive Plan Capital Facilities
Element adopts level of service standards listed in the 2022 Edmonds Parks Recreation and Open
Space Plan by reference (see PROS Plan Level of Service (LOS) Standards section). Population
and employment numbers are based on the 20-year Comprehensive Plan period of 2024 to 2044.
To operationalize the Capital Facilities Element, the City regularly updates and adopts a 6-year
Capital Facilities Plan (CFP); the CFP represents current capital activities and advances years of
applicability within the City’s 20-year planning period. As of the time of this study’s adoption, the
most recent CFP spans from 2027 to 2032.
Some of the projects in the CFP address existing deficiencies; only those portions of these
projects planned to accommodate future growth are considered in this study.
Project Eligibility
By law, impact fees can only be used for system improvements that benefit the new development
and relate to the demand from new development. To the extent these projects extend parks
capacity, the growth-related portion of capital project costs can be funded by impact fees. RCW
82.02.050(4) specifies that impact fees:
(a) Shall only be imposed for system improvements that are reasonably related to the
new development;
(b) Shall not exceed a proportionate share of the costs of system improvements that
are reasonably related to the new development; and
(c) Shall be used for system improvements that will reasonably benefit the new
development.
Examples of the types of park development and improvement projects that are growth-related
and impact-fee eligible include adding facilities at existing parks that increase capacity, such as
new and expanded parks, new sports fields, adding lighting to existing fields (to extend operable
hours), improving or creating paths and trails, replacing and expanding existing, outdated, and
underused equipment. A list of the specific projects that the City identified as necessary to
support growth is in the Identified Capital Projects section of this document.
Requirements for Impact Fee Rate Calculation
Impact fees must be assessed in accordance with the requirements of RCW 82.02 subsections
050 through 090. The schedule must be based on a formula or consistent method (RCW
82.02.060(1)). The fees must be adjusted for the share of future available funding sources. How
the proportionate share reduction is calculated is guided by RCW 82.02.060:
(1) …In determining proportionate share, the formula or other method of calculating impact
fees shall incorporate, among other things, the following:
(a) The cost of public facilities necessitated by new development;
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 44/524
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 44/524
October 26, 2026 City of Edmonds | Park Impact Fee Study 7
(b) An adjustment to the cost of the public facilities for past or future payments made or
reasonably anticipated to be made by new development to pay for particular system
improvements in the form of user fees, debt service payments, taxes, or other
payments earmarked for or proratable to the particular system improvement;
(c) The availability of other means of funding public facility improvements;
(d) The cost of existing public facilities improvements; and
(e) The methods by which public facilities improvements were financed.
See the following Fee Calculations for the method in accordance with RCW 82.02.060.
Fee Calculations
Anticipated Growth
Based on the 2027 to 2032 Capital Facilities Plan parks project list and demographic projections,
this study incorporates growth for the ten-year expenditure window for collected impact fees,
2027 through 2036.2
The City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan employment and household growth estimates for
2024 to 2044 were used as the baseline for this fee calculation. BERK also used past trends in
employees by sector, April 1st estimates of residential population, average household size, and
housing type data from the Office of Financial Management (OFM), U.S. Census Bureau’s
American Community Survey (ACS), and the Census Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics
dataset. BERK used either compound annual growth rate or share of employees by sector to
adapt the 2044 Comprehensive Plan growth estimates to the 6-year CFP timeline and 10-year
impact fee timeline. The estimates of number of employees by sector and square feet and
household size by number of bedrooms below.
Residential: Population, Housing, and Household Size
As part of the most recent Comprehensive Plan periodic update, Snohomish County provided the
City of Edmonds an allocation of households and employees to plan for between 2024 and 2044.
BERK calculated annual growth rates for the Edmonds residential population and housing units
using the compound annual growth rate to project from 2013 to 2023 OFM April 1st Population
Estimates and Housing Estimates for the City of Edmonds. The OFM housing estimates and data
from the U.S Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS)3 were used to determine the
share of growth by number of bedrooms in each dwelling unit. .
2 RCW 82.02.070.
3 Based on a BERK calculation using data from ACS 2023 five-year estimates in Table B25010 "Average Household Size of
Occupied Housing Units by Tenure."AAnd table B25041 "Bedrooms." To determine number of bedrooms in each block group
in Edmonds
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 45/524
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 45/524
October 26, 2026 City of Edmonds | Park Impact Fee Study 8
Exhibit 1 shows housing unit and residential population projections. This method assumes steady
growth, but the city will experience a different, and likely uneven, actual growth pattern as
projects are built during economic upturns and construction slows during recessions and
economic downturns.
Exhibit 1. Estimated and Projected Housing Units and Residential Population: 2023, 2027,
2032, 2036, and 2044
2023 Actuals 2027 Estimate
2032 Estimate
(CFP Period)
2036 Estimate
(Impact Fee Study
Period)
2044 Growth
Targets
(Comprehensive
Plan Period)
Housing
Units
19,599 20,223 22,220 23,920 28,073
Residential
Population
43,370 44,372 47,507 50,174 55,966
Sources: City of Edmonds, 2024; OFM, 2026; BERK, 2026.
Non-Residential: Employment
The City provided estimates for employment and square footage growth by building type in
Edmonds for 2023 to 2044, and assumptions of square feet per employee, by type. BERK
projected employment and non-residential square footage by type using a compound annual
growth rate for the impact fee period, shown below in Exhibit 2 and Exhibit 3.
Exhibit 2. Projected Employment (Jobs) by Type: 2023, 2027, 2032, 2036, and 2044 (Rounded)
NAICS Category 2023 Estimate 2027 Estimate
2032 Estimate
(CFP Period)
2036 Estimate
(Impact Fee
Study Period)
2044 Growth
Targets
(Comprehensive
Plan Period)
Construction/Resource 823 833 893 943 1,054
Manufacturing 138 131 141 148 166
WTU
(Warehousing,
Transportation,
Utilities)
636 497 533 563 629
Retail 1,903 1,971 2,112 2,232 2,492
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 46/524
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 46/524
October 26, 2026 City of Edmonds | Park Impact Fee Study 9
NAICS Category 2023 Estimate 2027 Estimate
2032 Estimate
(CFP Period)
2036 Estimate
(Impact Fee
Study Period)
2044 Growth
Targets
(Comprehensive
Plan Period)
FIRE
(Finance, Insurance,
Real Estate)
791 832 892 942 1,052
Services/Health
(exclude food service) 6,371 7,242 7,760 8,200 9,158
Government/Education 511 438 470 496 554
Restaurants 1,721 1,682 1,802 1,904 2,127
Total Jobs 12,894 13,626 14,600 15,430 17,232
Notes: FIRES indicates non-residential development in finance, insurance, and real estate. Employment estimates for 2026 were
provided by these types but do not include all employment categories.
Sources: Skagit County Council of Governments. 2024; BERK, 2026.
Exhibit 3. Projected Non-Residential Development by Type, 2023, 2027, 2032, 2036, and
2044 (Rounded)
Employment Type
Square Feet
per
Employee by
Type4
2023
Estimate
2027
Estimate
2032
Estimate
(CFP
Period)
2036
Estimate
(Impact Fee
Study
Period)
2044
Growth
Targets
(Comp.
Plan
Period)
Manufacturing 500 69,000 65,568 70,255 74,245 82,918
WTU
(Warehousing,
Transportation, Utilities)
1,000 636,000 497,426 532,986 563,256 629,051
Retail 700 1,332,100 1,379,503 1,478,122 1,562,070 1,744,539
FIRE
(Finance, Insurance, Real
Estate)
350 276,850 291,211 312,030 329,751 368,270
Services/Health
(exclude food service)
400 2,548,400 2,896,785 3,103,873 3,280,152 3,663,315
Government/Education 300 153,300 131,481 140,880 148,881 166,272
4 Pulled from 2021 Buildable Lands Report for Snohomish County
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 47/524
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 47/524
October 26, 2026 City of Edmonds | Park Impact Fee Study 10
Employment Type
Square Feet
per
Employee by
Type4
2023
Estimate
2027
Estimate
2032
Estimate
(CFP
Period)
2036
Estimate
(Impact Fee
Study
Period)
2044
Growth
Targets
(Comp.
Plan
Period)
Restaurants 200 344,200 336,323 360,366 380,832 425,318
Employment Sq. Feet - 5,359,850 5,598,297 5,998,512 6,339,188 7,079,683
Note: Employment categories like construction and resources do not have square footage per employee estimates in the
Snohomish County Buildable Lands Report as there are no physical locations associated with employees of those sectors.
Warehousing, storage, and management of construction and resource-based employees are captured in other employment and
commercial/industrial land use types. BERK is using the 2044 employment growth target as published in the Edmonds
Comprehensive Plan.
Sources: Edmonds Comprehensive Plan, 2024; Buildable Lands Report for Snohomish County, 2021; BERK, 2026.
Resident-Equivalent Employees
Employment growth can be linked to increased park usage by both the employees and non-
resident visitors to businesses in Edmonds. Multiple jurisdictions in Washington have attempted
to capture this increased usage resulting from growth by using the concept of resident-equivalent
employee population.5 Equivalent population estimates are based on quantifying the amount of
time that parks are available to each group. These estimates are not an estimate of usage, but of
possible usage given the periods that parks are open.
Based on hours of operation and U.S. Census Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics
(LEHD) data on employee location, BERK used an assumption that an employee can access City
parks 6.7% of the time a resident can access parks. Exhibit 4 and Exhibit 5 shows employee
population, employment, and resident-equivalent employee estimates for the year 2023 (which
reflect the most up to date LEHD Origin-Destination data) which was then extrapolated to
estimate future resident-equivalent and service population.
5 Examples of other jurisdictions that have used resident-equivalent employe population include the cities of Issaquah,
Redmond, Edmonds, and Montlake Terrace.
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 48/524
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 48/524
October 26, 2026 City of Edmonds | Park Impact Fee Study 11
Exhibit 4. Projected Employment and Resident-Equivalent Employee Population
Living
inside
Edmonds
Living outside
Edmonds Total
Population Working inside Edmonds 1,382 11,512 12,894
Population Working outside Edmonds 17,667
Not working 24,321
Total 43,370
Hours per week residential demand
Working inside Edmonds 49*
Working outside Edmonds 44**
Not working 84
Hours per week non-residential demand
Working inside Edmonds (estimated 1 hour for lunch/after
work) 5.0 5.0
Total
Weekly
Residential
Hours
Total Weekly
Non-residential
hours
Total hours
Working inside Edmonds 67,718 57,560 125,278
Working outside Edmonds 777,348 777,348
Not working 2,042,964 2,042,964
Total 2,888,030 57,560 2,945,590
Hours per resident 66.59
Hours per employee
(adjusted for employees who live and work in Edmonds) 4.46
Employee to Resident Conversion Factor 6.70%
*12 hours open (average annual sunrise-sunset) less 8 hours working time, 5 days per week plus 12 hours on Saturday and
Sunday.
**Excludes “lunch break” hour where parks are available to those who live and work in Edmonds.
Sources: City of Edmonds, 2025; BERK, 2026; LEHD 2023.
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 49/524
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 49/524
October 26, 2026 City of Edmonds | Park Impact Fee Study 12
Exhibit 5. Projected Service Population, 2023, 2027, 2032, 2036, and 2044
2023 Actual 2027 Estimate
2032 Estimate
(CFP Period)
2036 Estimate
(Impact Fee Study
Period)
2044 Growth
Targets
(Comprehensive
Plan Period)
Residential
Population
43,370 44,372 47,507 50,174 55,966
Non-Resident
Employee
Population
11,512 11,989 12,846 13,576 15,162
Resident Equivalent
Employees (6.7%)
772 804 861 910 1,016
Total Service
Population
44,142 45,176 48,368 51,084 56,982
Funding Other than Impact Fees
BERK used historic actuals provided by the City to find the expected share of funding related to
growth – please see Proportionate Share section of this document.
PROS Plan Level of Service (LOS) Standards
To collect park impact fees, the City of Edmonds must identify parks facilities and services
necessary to support growth. By law, these projects must be listed in a CFP that includes the
impact fee time period (RCW 82.02.050(4)). The Growth Management Hearings Board concluded
in McVittie 1999 that local governments need a locally established minimum standard to provide
the basis for objective measurement of need for those projects necessary to support growth
(McVittie, 99-3-0016c, FDO, at 25), or a Level of Service (LOS) standard.
The 2022 PROS Plan includes a complex approach to levels of service:
Neighborhood, Community, and Open Space Parks: acres per 1,000 population – base level
4.22 acres per 1,000 (maintain current ratios) and target level of 6.75 acres per 1,000
(increase ratios if additional funding is available)
Waterfront Parks and Special Use: No acreage standard
Quality, Distribution (parks in a ½ mile), Usage: All Parks and Trails
Residents are a primary user of parks but businesses (employees/visitors) in the city use parks,
trails and recreation facilities and hold and attend community events in waterfront and special
use parks and are part of the usage service levels. Collectively, the City provides capacity for a
service population including residents and a share of employees.
Thus, this rate study addresses a service population, which includes residents and resident-
equivalent employees.
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 50/524
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 50/524
October 26, 2026 City of Edmonds | Park Impact Fee Study 13
BERK used the 2022 facility list and adopted acreage LOS standards from the Parks, Recreation,
and Open Space Plan to estimate 2027 and 2036 acreage demand as well as how much of the
demand can be attributed to growth rather than addressing existing facility deficits. An analysis
of the quantitative level of service and acreage demand are shown in Exhibit 6.
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 51/524
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 51/524
October 26, 2026 City of Edmonds | Park Impact Fee Study 14
Exhibit 6. Edmonds Parks Existing Acreage, Acreage LOS Standard, and Recommended additions for Service Population (2027)
Facility Type PROS 2022
LOS *
2022
PROS Plan
Existing
Acreage* 2027 LOS
Acreage*
2027
Additional
Acreage
Demand
2036 LOS
Recommended
Acreage (based
on PROS LOS)*
2036
Additional
Acreage
Demand
2036 Acreage
Responding to
Growth**
2036 Percent of
Total Acre
Acquisition -
Future Growth
Related***
Community Park 1.85 acres/ 1,000 79.2 82.1 2.9 94.7 15.5 12.6 81%
Neighborhood
Park
0.61 acre/1,000 26.2 27.1 0.9 31.2 5.0 4.2 83%
Open Space 1.76 acres/1,000 75.6 78.1 2.5 90.1 14.5 12.0 83%
Sources: City of Edmonds PROS Plan, 2022; BERK, 2026.
* Based on Existing LOS in PROS Plan not the Proposed LOS Standard
** Difference between 2027 and 2036 goal acreage based on population estimates and acreage level of service
*** Percent of acreage demand attributable to 2027 to 2036 growth only relative to existing LOS at time of PROS adoption
Exhibit 6 provides a quantifiable assessment of public park acreage in Edmonds. These measures of acreage exclude additional
recreation spaces within city limits including several acres of City-owned special use parks, Snohomish County-owned parks, or
Edmonds School District-owned playgrounds and fields that are all available to the public (some with restricted hours, e.g. schools)
and within city limits.
In addition to acreage standards, the City has adopted additional LOS standards (Exhibit 7) to provide a more holistic view of demand
for facilities over the planning period. The PROS plan has a qualitative LOS measurement that accounts for park quality as well as
facility distribution and usage. These standards are based on the Washington State Recreation and Conservation Office (RCO) letter
grading system with the most recent assessment from 2022 found below.
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 52/524
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 52/524
October 26, 2026 City of Edmonds | Park Impact Fee Study 15
Exhibit 7. Levels of Service with RCO Metric (System-wide)
Criteria Assessment Type Metric for Value Value LOS Grade
Quality Criteria Public Satisfaction Condition of Local City Parks
(rated as Excellent or Good)
76.10% B
Quality Criteria Public Satisfaction Condition of Trails in Parks
(rated as Excellent or Good)
55.00% D
Quality Criteria Agency-based Assessment Condition Assessment Rating of
Existing Parks (3-point scale)
1.27 B
Distribution Criteria* Parkland Access (within 1/2-mile Type traveled) Percent Service Area with
Access to Active-Use City Parks
48.10% D
Distribution Criteria* Parkland Access (within 1/2-mile Type traveled) Percent Service Area with
Access to All Parks & Open
Space
69.80% C
Distribution Criteria* Trail System Access (within 1/2-mile traveled) Percent Service Area with
Access to Recreational Trails
38.80% F
Usage / Visitation Criteria Frequency of Park or Trail Usage Percent Visiting Parks at Least
Multiple Times per Month
88.00% A
*Note: The percentage of land area covered by service area walksheds is a proxy for the population within the residential portion of the city
Source: City of Edmonds PROS Plan, 2022 p.72
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 53/524
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 53/524
October 26, 2026 City of Edmonds | Park Impact Fee Study 16
Capital Facilities Plan Review
As part of the 2027-2032 Draft Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) & Capital Improvement Program
(CIP), the City of Edmonds Parks and Recreation Department has identified parks capital projects
that will be completed over the next 10 years. These projects include investments to support and
facilitate the increased usage of existing parks and recreation assets to meet growing demand, as
well as strategic expansions of the system as opportunities arise. The list of projects was assessed
based on the ability to accommodate future growth over the impact fee period based on a park’s
contributions to meeting the LOS standards described above.
Identified Capital Projects
As of the time of this study, the most recently adopted CFP covers the 2027 through 2032, and
this rate study identifies additional projects for the 2033 to 2036 time period since the City may
collect impact fees for a 10-year period. In addition to a description of each project, the CFP
contains the annual cost estimates adjusted for inflation (Exhibit 8) as well as anticipated funding
sources. The City and BERK aligned the project list with LOS standards and the proposal
description to identify the percent of each project associated with capacity to accommodate
2027 to 2036 growth. Exhibit 9 summarizes the overall cost of system improvements that are
attributable to growth and therefore impact fee eligible. Additional detaildetails on the percent
attributable to growth in the impact fee timeframe can be found in Exhibit 10. BERK calculated
the cost of projects attributable to growth to be $5.698 million for the 2027 to 2036 time period.
Key projects providing capacity as the community grows and that are designed to meet the
levels of service (base acres), quality, usage demand, or distribution include:
Playground Replacements #1 and #2: The portion of the replacements that expand
playgrounds beyond replacement add capacity.
Woodway Campus Athletic Complex - Phase I – Lighting: As part of a joint effort with the
School District, improvements would improve lighting and fields which increases capacity
for practice and games in an area of the City lacking public parkland.
Neighborhood Park - HWY 99 and SE Edmonds: Adds park acres and addresses distribution
level of service
Yost Park Expansion and Improvement (via Johnson Property)
Pine Street Park Improvements: new picnic and pathways added to the site increase
capacity and address the City’s quality level of service
The City will regularly review its CFP/CIP and periodically review its impact fee basis. Other
projects identified over the next 10 years may also be eligible for impact fees when they meet
level of service and add capacity to meet growth and demand for the City’s service population.
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 54/524
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 54/524
October 26, 2026 City of Edmonds | Park Impact Fee Study 17
Exhibit 8. Parks Capital Project List and Anticipated Funding Year, 2027 to 2036
Project List 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 - 2036 Total
Shell Creek Restoration $240,000 $200,000 $180,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $620,000
Playground Replacement #1 $0 $50,000 $350,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $400,000
Woodway Campus Athletic Complex - Phase I -
Lighting
$0 $0 $1,500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,500,000
Marsh Boardwalk Replacement $0 $0 $25,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $25,000
Playground Replacement #2 $0 $0 $50,000 $350,000 $0 $0 $0 $400,000
Neighborhood Park - HWY 99 Acquisition $0 $0 $0 $900,000 $0 $0 $0 $900,000
Neighborhood Park - HWY 99 Development $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $850,000 $0 $950,000
Johnson Property $0 $0 $0 $0 $50,000 $0 $300,000 $350,000
Neighborhood Park - SE 2 Acquisition $0 $0 $0 $0 $700,000 $0 $0 $700,000
Neighborhood Park - SE 2 Development $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $850,000 $950,000
Yost Pool Renovations and Upgrades $0 $120,000 $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $370,000
Pool Replacement $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $30,000,000 $0 $30,000,000
Parks & Facilities Maintenance and Operations
Building
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Edmonds Marsh Estuary Restoration (Willow
Creek Daylighting)
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,000,000 $10,000,000
Pine Street Park Improvements $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $225,000 $225,000
Total $240,000 $370,000 $2,355,000 $1,250,000 $850,000 $30,950,000 $11,375,000 $47,390,000
Source: Edmonds 2027 to 2032 Capital Facilities Plan; BERK, 2026
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 55/524
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 55/524
October 26, 2026 City of Edmonds | Park Impact Fee Study 18
Exhibit 9. Impact Fee Eligible System Improvement Projects, 2027 to 2032
Number of Improvement
Projects Total Future Project Cost
Total Identified Capital
Need from Growth
Percent of Cost Growth-
Related
Impact Fee Eligible Projects listed in
CFP
9 $6,375,000 $5,687,500 89.22%
Impact Fee Ineligible Projects listed in
CFP
5 $41,015,000 $0 0%
Total 14 $47,390,000 $5,687,500 12.00%
Source: Edmonds 2027 to 2032 Capital Facilities Plan; EPRD/BERK work session, 08/2026; BERK, 2026
Exhibit 10. Parks Attributable to Growth Capital Project List, Total Anticipated Cost Attributable to Growth, 2027 to 2036
Project Description
Total
Anticipated
Cost
% Related to
2027 to 2036
Growth*
$ Related to 2027 to
2036 Growth*
Shell Creek Restoration
Phase 1 & 2 *carryforward*
Planning, design (phase 1)), and renovation (phase 2). Project to
provide improved environmental health and erosion control of Shell
Creek in Yost Park, may include trail, bridge and boardwalk repair or
relocation.
$620,000 0% $0
Playground Replacement #1 Replacement of aging playground and related improvements to
improve ADA compliance. $400,000 75% $300,000
Woodway Campus Athletic
Complex - Phase I - Lighting
In cooperation with the Edmonds School District, complete a
community park and athletic complex at Former Woodway High
School to include lighting and future construction of two additional
fields.
$1,500,000 75% $1,125,000
Marsh Boardwalk
Replacement
Assessment of northwest Edmonds Marsh boardwalk for possible
replacement. $25,000 0% $0
Playground Replacement #2 Replacement of aging playground and related improvements to
improve ADA compliance. $400,000 75% $300,000
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 56/524
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 56/524
October 26, 2026 City of Edmonds | Park Impact Fee Study 19
Project Description
Total
Anticipated
Cost
% Related to
2027 to 2036
Growth*
$ Related to 2027 to
2036 Growth*
Neighborhood Park - HWY
99
Acquisition of a new neighborhood park near SR 99. $900,000 100% $900,000
Neighborhood Park - HWY
99
Master plan and development of a new neighborhood park near SR
99. $950,000 100% $950,000
Johnson Property Master plan for future use and expansion of Yost Park. Site
development not included in estimate. $350,000 100% $350,000
Neighborhood Park - SE 2 Acquisition of new neighborhood park in Southeast Edmonds $700,000 100% $700,000
Neighborhood Park - SE 2 Master plan and development of a new neighborhood park in
Southeast Edmonds. $950,000 100% $950,000
Yost Pool Renovations and
Upgrades
Planning Year 1/improvements Year 2 - 3 (grant dependent in Y1) $370,000 0% $0
Pool Replacement Replacement of the existing Yost pool due to end of life cycle.
Consideration of possible partnerships with design, location, and
funding TBD.
$30,000,000 0% $0
Parks & Facilities
Maintenance and Operations
Building
Replace and/or renovate Parks & Facilities Maintenance Shop
located in City Park. Phase 1 - feasibility study. $0 0% $0
Edmonds Marsh Estuary
Restoration (Willow Creek
Daylighting)
Acquisition, Master Plan development and implementation of the
Edmonds Marsh to daylight the waterway connection of Puget
Sound to the Edmonds Marsh and two freshwater creeks providing
restoration of freshwater/saltwater estuary and natural tidal
exchange.
$10,000,000 0% $0
Pine Street Park
Improvements
New shelter, pathway, picnic tablestables, and trees (design and
installation) $225,000 50% $112,500
Total $47,390,000 12.00% $5,687,500**
* Based on Edmonds Parks and Recreation Department/BERK work sessions, 08/2026. 09/2026, and 10/2026
**This is compared with the per capita system value below. The lesser of the per capita capacity-building project costs or per capita system value investment is used in fees.
Source: Edmonds 2027 to 2032 Capital Facilities Plan; BERK, 2026
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 57/524
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 57/524
October 26, 2026 City of Edmonds | Park Impact Fee Study 20
Future Need
The City’s financial need related to parks growth is the lesser of two numbers:
1.Facility LOS Standards needs per capita: The future needs identified by the lesser of the
levels of service identified in Exhibit 6.
2.Growth-related project cost per capita: The capital projects that the City has identified.
Any given LOS standard may suggest that the City will need to invest in capital projects at a
level that is not physically or financially possible. For example, the City’s parks facilities-based
LOS standard may suggest a necessary investment in an area where there is no land available.
Exhibit 11 compares the expected per capita share of capital need using the facility LOS service
standard and the planned capital projects that the City has identified.
A secondary approach to determine the per capita share of capital need is to calculate the current
system value, dividing it by current service population to determine the current rate of per capita
investment in parks system. This is summarized below in Exhibit 12 and Exhibit 13.
The per capita investment approach acts as the upper bound of per capita need and the capital
project-based need is compared to this value and if it is higher, the lesser of the two values is
used in the rates. The final per capita share of capital need thatneed based on growth-related
capital projects is used in the impact fee calculations to calculate impact fees as this value is the
lower of the two. This is described in the next section below. is between these two numbers.
Should the City amend its Ccapital Ffacilitiesy Pplan in the future with additional capacity projects
and increase the per capita share of capital need but still remain consistent with or below the
system value per capita amount, it can revise the park impact fee rates accordingly.
Exhibit 11. Parks Future Needs Identified by Identified Growth-Related Capital Projects
New Resident Population, 2027 to 2036 5,803
New Employee Population, 2027 to 2036 1,803
New Resident-Equivalent Employees, 2027 to 2036 (6.7%) 106
New Service Population, 2027 to 2036 5,909
Identified Capital Need from Growth, 2027 to 2036 $5,687,500
Per Capita (Resident) Share of Capital Need (2027 to 2036) $980.10
Sources: City of Edmonds, 2026; LEHD, 2023; OFM, 2026; BERK, 2026.
Per Capita System Value Investment- Share of Need Measure
The secondary way to determine per capita share of need is based on existing value of
Edmonds Park properties and facilities. The current value of the City’s park system was
determined by the Washington Cities Insurance Authority (WCIA) in a report retrieved on
January 26th, 20262026. This report outlines the value of the parks facilities, buildings,
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 58/524
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 58/524
October 26, 2026 City of Edmonds | Park Impact Fee Study 21
structures, infrastructure, and improvements including a total of $50.8M, without discounts for
depreciation. The report also includes land values which BERK found to be inconsistent with
the market value of the land and therefore an unreliable metric of system valuefor replacement
value of the land. The land value of parks is instead based on the 2026 Snohomish County
Assessor’s assessed land value. BERK then usedtook the current cost of the system from these
two sources replacement value of the system as shown in the report and divided by the current
service population to determine the average per capita investment in the parks systemThe
estimates are based on a combination of assessed land value of current park properties,
including improvements, and depreciation based on the life span of the park facility or asset.
Book ValueReplacement CostSystem Value of Parks System
Data from WCIA and the Assessor was used to estimate the total book value replacement cost
system value of the Edmonds parks system, which is estimated to beat $117.440.6 million.The
A comparison of the replacement cost system value using WCIA improvements and land values
($50.9 million) versus using WCIA improvements value and Snohomish County Assessor’s land
value ($117.4 million) is shown in Exhibit 12.The total per capita value of the City’s park
system value was calculated by dividing the system value in $2026 consisted of the
replacement cost in $2026 of capital investment owned by Edmonds Parks and Recreation
dividedby the city’s current service population which combines residents with resident
equivalent employees (REE). The full comparison and final per capita investment amount is
summarized in Exhibit 12. It should be noted that replacement value for park land is generally
slightly higher than assessed value, since park land is often assessed below market value as
government-owned property. This is compounded by rapidly rising land and construction costs,
meaning that replacement value likely understates the amount of value that City has in its park
land.
The total per capita value of the City’s park system consisted of the combined values of land,
buildings, and facilities divided by the City’s current resident population or, alternatively, the
service population which combines residents with resident equivalent employees (REE). This
can be seen in Exhibit 12. Additional value needed based on the service population growth over
the impact fee period can be found in Exhibit 13.
Exhibit 12. Book Value Replacement Cost System Value of Park System and Per Capita
Investment
Category
WCIA-Only System
Values - Only
Replacement Cost
$2026 (rounded)
WCIA System
Value + Assessor
Land Values
Replacement
Cost$2026
(rounded)Book
Value (rounded)
Resident
Only REE
Service
Population
2026 Estimated Population 43,770 793 44,563
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 59/524
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 59/524
October 26, 2026 City of Edmonds | Park Impact Fee Study 22
Category
WCIA-Only System
Values - Only
Replacement Cost
$2026 (rounded)
WCIA System
Value + Assessor
Land Values
Replacement
Cost$2026
(rounded)Book
Value (rounded)
Resident
Only REE
Service
Population
Land ValueLand Value $15,060,587
$81,592,800$15,0
60,587
Building ValueBuilding Book
Value $1,545,347
$1,545,347$470,1
69
Equipment ValueEquipment
Book Value $214,541
$214,541$103,13
0
Improvement
ValueInfrastructure/Improve
ment Book Value $32,354,734
$32,354,734$24,9
86,528
Infrastructure Value $1,713,505 $1,713,505
Current Estimated Total
Replacement System Value
$50,888,716
(value not in use)
$117,420,928$40,
620,415
(value in use)
2026 Park System
Investment Per Capita
Service Population
$928.04 $2,634.96
$911.53*
*This number is in use for impact fee calculations as it is lower than the per capita share of capital need
Source: BERK, 2026
Exhibit 13. Additional Park System Investment Needed to Accommodate Growth
New Resident Population, 2027 to 2036 5,803
New Employee Population, 2027 to 2036 1,803
New Resident-Equivalent Employees, 2027 to 2036 (6.7%) 106
New Service Population, 2027 to 2036 5,909
Per Capita Need based on 2026 Per Capita Investment $2,634.96$911.53
Additional Value Needed, 2027 to 2036 (Service Population) $15,569,498$5,386,088
Source: BERK, 2026
Service Areas
Since the City of Edmonds only has the authority to set impact fees on residential and non-
residential developments within city limits, this rate study uses OFM-provided city limit
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 60/524
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 60/524
October 26, 2026 City of Edmonds | Park Impact Fee Study 23
residential population estimates and LEHD-based employee population, scaling for resident-
equivalent employees to extrapolate the service population.
Unadjusted Rate Schedules – Capital Project Based
BERK found the expected fee by development type before adjusting for the expected
proportionate share. BERK calculated fees depending upon the development type are as
follows:
Residential – based on number of bedrooms
Non-Residential: Warehousing, Transportation, Utilities (WTU)
Non-Residential: Manufacturing
Non-Residential: Finance, Insurance, Real Estate (FIRE)
Non-Residential: Services and Health (excludes restaurants)
Non-Residential: Restaurants
Non-Residential: Government and Education
For residential development, impact fees are charged per dwelling unit based on the number of
bedrooms in the unit. To connect residential units, bedrooms, and resident population per unit,
this study used information from the U.S. Census Bureau’s ACS 5-Year Estimates at the Census
Block Group Level. The Appendix shows the calculations and methodology used to determine
residential impact fees by bedroom number. The results are listed below in Exhibit 14.
For impact fees collected on non-residential developments, fees are charged per 1,000 gross
square feet of development. The unadjusted rates are as shown in Exhibit 15 and Exhibit 16.
Exhibit 14. Population Per Household Estimates by Number of Bedrooms in Edmonds
Number of Bedrooms*
Average household Population
= .4068 X bedroom number + 1.129
0 1.13
1 1.54
2 1.94
3 2.35
4 2.76
5+ 3.16
*ADUs cannot be charged more than 50% of the impact fee for the primary unit.
Source: ACS, 2024; BERK, 2026.
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 61/524
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 61/524
October 26, 2026 City of Edmonds | Park Impact Fee Study 24
Exhibit 15. Unadjusted Residential Rate Schedules for Parks by Development Type
Residential Units by Bedroom number 0 1 2 3 4 5+ Total
Growth in Resident Population, 2027 to 2036 5,803
Identified Service Area Capital Need from Growth
(Projects), 2027 to 2036Identified System Value
Investment Need 2027-2036
$5,687,500$
5,386,088
Per Capita Share of Capital Need, 2027 to 2036Per
Capita Share of System Value Investment Need 2027-
2036
$980.10$911
.53
Estimated Number of Residents per Unit 1.13 1.54 1.94 2.35 2.76 3.16
Unadjusted Park Impact Fee: Cost per bedroom in
Primary Dwelling Unit
$1,106.53
$1,029.12
$1,505.23
$1,399.93
$1,903.94
$1,770.75
$2,302.64
$2,141.56
$2,701.34
$2,512.37
$3,100.05
$2,883.18
Unadjusted Park Impact Fee: Cost per bedroom in
Accessory Dwelling Unit
$553.26$5
14.56
$752.62$6
99.97
$951.97$8
85.37
$1,151.32
$1,070.78
$1,350.67
$1,256.18
$1,550.02
$1,441.59
Source: BERK, 2026.
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 62/524
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 62/524
October 26, 2026 City of Edmonds | Park Impact Fee Study 25
Exhibit 16. Unadjusted Non-Residential Rate Schedules for Parks by Development Type
Manufacturing
WTU
(Warehousing,
Transportation,
Utilities)
Retail
FIRE
(Finance,
Insurance,
Real Estate)
Services/Health
(exclude food
service)
Government
/Education Restaurants Total
Growth in Estimated Built Square Feet,
2027 to 2036 8,677 65,830 182,567 38,540 383,367 17,400 44,510 740,891
Identified Service Area Capital Need from
Growth (Projects)Identified System Value
Investment Need 2027-2036
$5,687,500
$5,386,088
Per Capita Share of Capital Need
2027 to 2036
(Resident Equivalent Employees)Per Capita
Share of System Value Investment Need
2027-2036 (Employees)
$65.70$61.
11
Estimated Number of Employees per 1,000
Sq. Ft
2.002.00 1.001.00 1.431.43 2.862.86 2.502.50 3.333.33 5.005.00
Unadjusted Park Impact Fee: Cost per 1,000
Gross Square Feet
$131.41$1
22.21
$65.70$61.1
1
$93.86$8
7.30
$187.72$1
74.59
$164.26$15
2.77
$219.01$
203.69
$328.52$
305.54
Source: BERK, 2026.
These schedules represent intermediary steps to a final rate schedule; each must be adjusted for the expected proportion of other
non-impact fee future funding contributed by growth.
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 63/524
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 63/524
October 26, 2026 City of Edmonds | Park Impact Fee Study 26
Proportionate Share
As required RCW 82.02.030(1), BERK calculated the proportionate share of future payments
reasonably anticipated to be made by new development users in the form of fees, debt service
payments, taxes, and other payments specific to the identified public facilities.
Aside from parks impact fees, the City uses grants, contributions, and Real Estate Excise Taxes
(REET) to fund park capital projects. Exhibit 17 shows the amount of parks capital REET
expenditures that Edmonds has spent and is expected to spend over the time period. From 2015
to 2025, these are actual expenditures; for 2026 to 2045, BERK projected these expenditures
into the future.
Exhibit 17. Parks REET Expenditures: Actual and Projected, $2026
Sources: City of Edmonds, 2026; Edmonds Budget, 2026; BERK, 2026.
$0
$500,000
$1,000,000
$1,500,000
$2,000,000
$2,500,000
$3,000,000
REET Expenditures (2026$)
Projected Actual
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 64/524
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 64/524
October 26, 2026 City of Edmonds | Park Impact Fee Study 27
To project REET expenditures, BERK evaluated data shared from the City of Edmonds 2015 to
2025. These expenditures were inflation-adjusted to 2026 dollars using the U.S. City Average
All Urban Consumer Price Index. REET expenditures were finally converted into per capita
estimates for consistency with this study’s growth projection methodology.
The City identified the annual amount of REET expected to be used for each park capital project.
For simplicity and transparency, BERK used the portion of new service population as a rough
indicator of the portion of REET from new growth. Exhibit 18 shows these calculations used to
find the average per capita REET expenditures expected to be used for park capital projects
stemming from growth.
Exhibit 18. Proportionate Share of Expected REET Expenditures, $2026
Year
Expected REET
Expenditures for
Park Capital
Projects
Estimated Total
Service
Population
Additional
Service
Population Since
2026
Percent of
Service
Population from
Growth
Estimated Portion of Park
Capital REET from Growth
Per Capita Park
Capital REET
from Growth
2027 $1,114,627.34 45,176 613 1.4% $15,120.16 $24.67
2028 $1,136,919.89 45,797 1,234 2.7% $30,635.92 $24.83
2029 $1,159,658.29 46,427 1,864 4.0% $46,555.76 $24.98
2030 $1,182,851.45 47,065 2,502 5.3% $62,888.35 $25.13
2031 $1,206,508.48 47,712 3,150 6.6% $79,642.51 $25.29
2032 $1,230,638.65 48,368 3,806 7.9% $96,827.27 $25.44
2033 $1,255,251.43 49,034 4,471 9.1% $114,451.82 $25.60
2034 $1,280,356.45 49,708 5,145 10.4% $132,525.56 $25.76
2035 $1,305,963.58 50,391 5,829 11.6% $151,058.06 $25.92
2036 $1,332,082.86 51,084 6,522 12.8% $170,059.11 $26.08
Average Per Capita Park Capita Expected REET Expenditures from Growth $25.37
Note: All amounts shown in 2026 dollars
Sources: City of Edmonds, 2026; BERK, 2026.
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 65/524
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 65/524
October 26, 2026 City of Edmonds | Park Impact Fee Study 28
Adjusted Rate Schedule
BERK deducted the proportionate share REET expenditure estimates in the unadjusted rates to create adjusted rate schedules.
These rate schedules represent the final rate study calculation of suggested impact fee rates. The adjusted rate schedules are
presented in Exhibit 19 and Exhibit 20.
Exhibit 19. Adjusted Residential Rate Schedules for Parks by Development Type
Residential Units by Bedroom number 0 1 2 3 4 5+Total
Growth in Resident Population, 2027 to 2036 5,803
Identified Service Area Capital Need from Growth (CFP
Projects)Identified System Value Investment 2027-2036
$5,687,500
$5,386,088
Per Capita Share of Capital Need 2027-2036Per Capita Share
of System Value Investment 2027-2036
$980.10$91
1.53
Estimated Number of Residents per Unit 1.131.13 1.541.54 1.941.94 2.352.35 2.762.76 3.163.16
Unadjusted Park Impact Fee: Cost per Primary Unit $1,106.53
$1,029.12
$1,505.23
$1,399.93
$1,903.94
$1,770.75
$2,302.64
$2,141.56
$2,701.34
$2,512.37
$3,100.05
$2,883.18
Unadjusted Park Impact Fee: Cost per Accessory Unit $553.26$
514.56
$752.62$
699.97
$951.97$
885.37
$1,151.32
$1,070.78
$1,350.67
$1,256.18
$1,550.02
$1,441.59
Expected Parks Capital REET Expenditures per Capita
$25.37$25.3
7
Expected IF Revenue per Unit
$28.64$2
8.64
$38.96$3
8.96
$49.28$4
9.28
$59.60$5
9.60
$69.92$6
9.92
$80.24$8
0.24
Adjusted Park Impact Fee: Cost per bedroom in Primary
Dwelling Unit
$1,077.89
$1,000.48
$1,466.27
$1,360.97
$1,854.65
$1,721.46
$2,243.04
$2,081.96
$2,631.42
$2,442.45
$3,019.80
$2,802.94
Adjusted Park Impact Fee: Cost per bedroom in Accessory
Dwelling Unit
$538.94$
500.24
$733.14$
680.49
$927.33$
860.73
$1,121.52
$1,040.98
$1,315.71
$1,221.22
$1,509.90
$1,401.47
Source: BERK, 2026.
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 66/524
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 66/524
October 26, 2026 City of Edmonds | Park Impact Fee Study 29
Exhibit 20. Adjusted Non-Residential Rate Schedules for Parks by Development Type
Manufacturing
WTU
(Warehousing,
Transportation,
Utilities)
Retail
FIRE (Finance,
Insurance, Real
Estate)
Services/Health
(exclude food
service)
Government
/Education Restaurants Total
Growth in Estimated Built Square Feet,
2027 to 2036
8,677 65,830 182,567 38,540 383,367 17,400 44,510 740,891
Identified Service Area Capital Need from
Growth (Projects)Identified System Value
Investment Need 2027-2036
$5,687,500$5
,386,088
Per Capita Share of Capital Need
2027 to 2036
(Resident Equivalent Employee)Per Capita
Share of System Value Investment Need
2027-2036 (Employees)
$65.70$61.11
Estimated Number of Employees per
1,000 Sq. Ft
2.002.00 1.001.00 1.431.4
3
2.862.86 2.502.50 3.333.33 5.005.00
Unadjusted Park Impact Fee: Cost per
1,000 Gross Square Feet
$131.41$1
22.21
$65.70$61.11 $93.86$
87.30
$187.72$17
4.59
$164.26$152.
77
$219.01$
203.69
$328.52$
305.54
Expected Parks Capital REET
Expenditures per Capita (Resident
Equivalent Employee)
$1.70
Expected REET Revenue per 1,000 Gross
Square Feet
$3.40$3.40 $1.70$1.70 $2.43$2
.43
$4.86$4.86 $4.25$4.25 $5.67$5.6
7
$8.50$8.5
0
Adjusted Park Impact Fee Rates per
1,000 Gross Square Feet
$128.01$1
18.81
$64.00$59.41 $91.43$
84.87
$182.87$16
9.73
$160.01$148.
52
$213.34$
198.02
$320.01$
297.03
Source: BERK, 2026.
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 67/524
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 67/524
October 26, 2026 City of Edmonds | Park Impact Fee Study 30
Appendix
This appendix includes the calculations and methodology used to determine average household
size by resident population and number of bedrooms in Edmonds.
Exhibit 21. Average Household Size by Population and Number of Bedrooms in Edmonds
Census Tract Block Group
Average
bedrooms
Average pop per
household
502 1 3.72 2.86
502 2 3.58 2.99
502 3 3.58 2.29
503 1 3.63 2.86
503 2 3.18 2.73
503 3 3.92 2.1
504.02 1 1.59 2.27
504.02 2 2.48 2.14
504.02 3 3.22 2.48
504.02 4 2.82 2.15
504.03 1 3.57 2.72
504.03 2 2.70 2.1
504.03 3 3.48 2.52
504.04 1 3.08 2.75
504.04 2 2.85 2.12
504.04 3 2.08 1.77
505.01 1 2.30 1.69
505.01 2 1.82 1.42
505.01 3 1.83 1.62
505.02 1 3.80 2.53
505.02 2 2.77 1.9
505.02 3 3.02 2.23
507 1 2.96 2.42
507 2 2.73 2.14
507 3 3.46 2.26
507 4 2.47 2.14
507 5 2.53 2.39
508 2 2.30 2.32
508 3 2.80 2.4
508 4 3.55 2.74
509 1 1.97 2.01
509 2 2.96 2.55
515 3 2.24 2.28
Source: ACS, 2023; BERK, 2026.
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 68/524
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 68/524
October 26, 2026 City of Edmonds | Park Impact Fee Study 31
Exhibit 22. Average Household Size Trend by Number of Bedrooms in Edmonds
Source: ACS, 2024; BERK, 2026.
y = 0.4068x + 1.129
R² = 0.4845
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50
Average population per
household
Average number of bedrooms
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 69/524
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 69/524
Page 1 of 11
The Edmonds City Code is current through Ordinance 4444, passed August 3, 2026.
3.36.020 Definitions.
The following words and terms shall have the following meanings for the purposes of this
chapter unless the context clearly requires otherwise. Terms otherwise not defined herein shall
be defined pursuant to RCW 82.02.090 and ECDC Title 21 or given their usual and customary
meaning.
“Accessory dwelling unit” is defined in ECDC 21.05.015.
“Bedroom” means any room in a dwelling or sleeping unit with an exterior window meeting
emergency escape and opening requirements other than a kitchen, bathroom, living room,
walk-in closet, or dining room, and equipped with a smoke alarm. This includes rooms such as
dens, studies, offices, or other similar rooms that could be used or is intended to be used for
sleeping purposes. A bedroom shall have a minimum size of 70 square feet with a minimum
dimension of seven feet in any plan dimension. Rooms that meet these criteria will be
considered bedrooms for the purpose of calculating impact fees.
“Building permit” means an official document or certification which is issued by the building
official and which authorizes the construction, alteration, enlargement, conversion,
reconstruction, remodeling, rehabilitation, erection, demolition, moving or repair of a building
or structure.
“Capital facilities plan” means the capital facilities plan element of a comprehensive plan
adopted by the city of Edmonds pursuant to Chapter 36.70A RCW, and such plan as amended.
There are many references in state statutes to the “capital facilities plan” (CFP) as the basis for
projects that are eligible for funding by impact fees. The parks element of the city of Edmonds
comprehensive plan fulfills the requirements of RCW 82.02.050 et seq., pertaining to a “capital
facilities plan,” and is considered to be the “capital facilities plan” (CFP) for the purpose of
Edmonds’ impact fees for parks. The transportation element of the city of Edmonds
comprehensive plan fulfills the requirements of RCW 82.02.050 et seq., pertaining to a “capital
facilities plan,” and is considered to be the “capital facilities plan” (CFP) for the purpose of
Edmonds’ impact fees for streets. Depending on the context, references to a CFP in the impact
fee chapter, rate study, and procedures guide are interpreted as referring to either the parks
element of the city of Edmonds comprehensive plan or the transportation element of the city of
Edmonds comprehensive plan, including the projects eligible for impact fees listed in Appendix
C of the procedures guide for the transportation impact fees.
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 70/524
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 70/524
Page 2 of 11
The Edmonds City Code is current through Ordinance 4444, passed August 3, 2026.
“City” means the city of Edmonds.
“Council” means the city council of the city of Edmonds.
“Department” means the planning and development department.
“Development activity” means any construction, expansion, or change in the use of a building or
structure that creates additional demand and need for public facilities.
“Development approval” means any written authorization from the city of Edmonds which
authorizes the commencement of a development activity.
“Director” means the director designated by the mayor to administer the impact fee program or
that director’s designee.
“Dwelling unit” is defined in ECDC 21.20.050.
“Encumbered” means to reserve, set aside, or otherwise earmark the impact fees in order to
pay for commitments, contractual obligations, or other liabilities incurred for public facilities.
“Feepayer” is a person, corporation, partnership, an incorporated association, or any other
similar entity, or department or bureau of any governmental entity or municipal corporation
commencing a land development activity which creates the demand for additional capital
facilities, and which requires the issuance of a building permit. “Feepayer” includes an applicant
for an impact fee credit.
“Hearing examiner” is defined in ECDC 21.40.010.
“Impact fee” means a payment of money imposed by the city of Edmonds on development
activity pursuant to this chapter as a condition of granting development approval in order to
pay for the public facilities needed to serve new growth and development. “Impact fee” does
not include a reasonable permit fee, an application fee, the administrative fee for collecting and
handling school impact fees, the cost of reviewing independent fee calculations or any other
charge or fee based upon the administrative costs of processing a development application.
“Impact fee account” or “account” means the account(s) established for each type of public
facility for which impact fees are collected. The accounts shall be established pursuant to ECC
3.36.080 and 3.36.090 and comply with the requirements of RCW 82.02.070.
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 71/524
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 71/524
Page 3 of 11
The Edmonds City Code is current through Ordinance 4444, passed August 3, 2026.
“Independent fee calculation” means the impact fee calculation and/or economic
documentation prepared by a feepayer to support the assessment of an impact fee other than
by the use of the rates listed in ECC 3.36.120 and 3.36.125, or the calculations prepared by the
director where none of the fee categories or fee amounts in ECC 3.36.120 and 3.36.125
accurately describe or capture the impacts of the new development on public facilities.
“Interest” means the average interest rate earned in the last fiscal year by the city of Edmonds.
“Low-income housing” means housing affordable to, and occupied by, a household whose
income does not exceed 80 percent of area median income as reported by the United States
Department of Housing and Urban Development for the Seattle-Bellevue metropolitan area. To
be considered affordable, for the purpose of this definition, the combined monthly cost of the
housing, including rent, utilities, and other charges for the applicable unit, may not exceed 30
percent of the household’s monthly income, adjusted for family size.
“Occupancy permit” means the permit issued by the city of Edmonds authorizing the building to
be occupied where a development activity results in a change in use of the preexisting
structure, or the creation of a new use where none previously existed.
“Owner” means the owner of record of real property, or a person with an unrestricted written
option to purchase property; provided, that if the real property is being purchased under a
recorded real estate contract, the purchaser shall be considered the owner of the real property.
“Procedures guide” means the administrative guidance document prepared by the director
pursuant to ECC 3.36.150.
“Project improvements” means site improvements and facilities that are planned and designed
to provide service for a particular development or users of the project and are not system
improvements. No improvement or facility included in a capital facilities plan adopted by the
council shall be considered a project improvement.
“Public facilities” means the public parks, open space and recreation facilities owned by the city
of Edmonds or other governmental entities in the context of the park impact fee and means the
public streets and roads owned by the city of Edmonds or other governmental entities in the
context of the street impact fee.
“Rate study” means the “Rate Study for Impact Fees for Parks, Open Space and Recreation
Facilities,” city of Edmonds, dated July 12, 2013, in the context of the park impact fee and means
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 72/524
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 72/524
Page 4 of 11
The Edmonds City Code is current through Ordinance 4444, passed August 3, 2026.
the “Rate Study for Impact Fees for Roads,” city of Edmonds, dated October 29, 2009, in the
context of the street impact fee.
“Residential” or “residential development” means all types of construction intended for human
habitation. This shall include, but is not limited to, single-family, duplex, triplex, and other
multifamily development. This also includes the residential portion of mixed-use developments.
“Service area” means the entire corporate limits of the city of Edmonds.
“Significant past tax payment” means taxes exceeding five percent of the amount of the impact
fee, and which were paid prior to the date the impact fee is assessed and were earmarked or
proratable to the same system improvements for which the impact fee is assessed.
“State” means the state of Washington.
“System improvements” means public facilities that are included in the city of Edmonds capital
facilities plan and are designed to provide service to service areas within the community at
large, in contrast to project improvements. [Ord. 4423 § 1, 2026; Ord. 4299 § 4 (Exh. A), 2023; Ord. 4048
§ 1, 2016; Ord. 4037 § 1 (Att. A), 2016; Ord. 3934 § 1 (Exh. A), 2013].
3.36.030 Assessment and payment of impact fees.
A. Required. The city shall collect impact fees, based on the rates in ECC 3.36.120 and 3.36.125,
from any applicant seeking development approval from the city for any development activity
within the city as provided herein, including the expansion of existing structures or uses or
change of existing uses that creates additional demand for public facilities.
1. For the purposes of this chapter, development activity shall not include miscellaneous
improvements that do not add any demand for public facilities, including, but not limited
to, fences, walls, swimming pools accessory to a residential use, and signs.
2. For the purposes of this chapter, development activity shall not include replacement of
a residential structure with a new residential structure of the same type at the same site or
lot when such replacement occurs within 12 months of the demolition or destruction of the
prior residential structure. Replacement of a residential structure with a new residential
structure of the same type shall be interpreted to include any residential structure for
which there is no increase in the number of residential units.
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 73/524
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 73/524
Page 5 of 11
The Edmonds City Code is current through Ordinance 4444, passed August 3, 2026.
3. For the purposes of this chapter, development activity shall not include alterations,
expansions, enlargement, remodeling, rehabilitation or conversion of an existing dwelling
unit where no additional dwelling units are created and the use is not changed.
B. Timing and Calculation of Fees. Impact fees shall be assessed based upon the impact fee
rates in effect at the time of issuance of the building permit, including but not limited to change
of use permit or remodel permit.
1. For a change in use of an existing building or dwelling unit, including any alteration,
expansion, replacement or new accessory building, the impact fee shall be the applicable
impact fee for the new use, less an amount equal to the applicable impact fee for the prior
use.
2. For mixed-use developments, impact fees shall be imposed for the proportionate share
of each land use based on the applicable measurement in the impact fee rates set forth in
ECC 3.36.120 and 3.36.125.
3. Where the impact fees imposed are determined by the square footage of the
development, the building official will establish the gross floor area created by the
proposed development.
4. Where the impact fees imposed are determined by the number of bedrooms in a
residential development, the building official will determine the number of bedrooms
based on the criteriadefinition set forth in ECC 3.36.020 in the proposed development for
the purpose of impact fee calculation.
54. Applicants that have been awarded credits prior to the submittal of the complete
building permit application pursuant to ECC 3.36.050 shall submit, along with the complete
building permit application, a copy of the letter or certificate prepared by the director
pursuant to ECC 3.36.050 setting forth the dollar amount of the credit awarded.
65. Applicants shall pay an administrative fee that covers the cost of staff time in
administering the impact fee program. The amount of the administrative fee shall be
established and updated from time to time by resolution of the city council.
C. Payment. Unless deferred pursuant to ECC 3.36.160, impact fees shall be paid at the time
the building permit or business license is issued by the city. The department shall not issue the
required building permit or business license or other approval unless and until the impact fees
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 74/524
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 74/524
Page 6 of 11
The Edmonds City Code is current through Ordinance 4444, passed August 3, 2026.
set forth in ECC 3.36.120 and 3.36.125 have been paid in the amount that they exceed
exemptions or credits provided pursuant to ECC 3.36.040 or 3.36.050; provided, that building
permits may be issued without impact fee payment when payment is deferred in accordance
with ECC 3.36.160. [Ord. 4423 § 1, 2026; Ord. 4360 § 1 (Exh. A), 2024; Ord. 4048 § 1, 2016; Ord. 4037 § 1 (Att.
A), 2016; Ord. 3934 § 1 (Exh. A), 2013].
3.36.040 Exemptions.
A. Except as provided for below, the following shall be exempted from the payment of all
impact fees under this chapter:
1. Alteration of an existing nonresidential structure that does not involve a change in use
and does not expand the usable space or add any residential units;
2. Miscellaneous improvements that do not expand usable space or add any bedrooms or
residential units, including, but not limited to, fences, walls, swimming pools, and signs;
3. Demolition or moving of a structure;
4. Expansion of an existing structure that results in the addition of 100 square feet or less
of gross floor area or that results in no additional bedrooms in a residential structure;
5. Replacement of a structure with a new structure of the same size and use at the same
site or lot when a building permit application for such replacement is submitted to the city
within 12 months of the demolition or destruction of the prior structure. Replacement of a
structure with a new structure of the same size shall be interpreted to include any
structure for which the gross square footage of the building will not be increased by more
than 100 square feet or that results in no additional bedrooms in a residential structure; or
6. Alterations, expansions, enlargement, remodeling, rehabilitation or conversion of an
existing dwelling unit where no additional bedrooms or dwelling units are created and the
use is not changed.
B. Low-income housing units shall be exempt from paying 80 percent of the transportation
impact fees to the extent the units satisfy this subsection. Such exemption shall be conditioned
upon the developer recording a covenant that prohibits using the low-income housing units for
any purpose other than for low-income housing. At a minimum, the covenant must address
price restrictions and household income limits for the low-income housing development and,
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 75/524
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 75/524
Page 7 of 11
The Edmonds City Code is current through Ordinance 4444, passed August 3, 2026.
that if the property is converted to a use other than for low-income housing, the property
owner must pay the applicable impact fees in effect at the time of conversion. The covenant
shall also require the owner to submit an annual report to the city along with supporting
documentation that shows that the low-income units are continuing to be rented in compliance
with the covenant. The covenant shall be an obligation that runs with the land upon which the
housing is located. The covenant shall be in a form acceptable to the city attorney and shall be
recorded upon the developer’s payment of the remaining 20 percent of the street impact fee.
C. Multifamily housing unit (with tax exemption under RCW 84.14.020(1)(a)(ii)(D)) and located
within a station are (as defined in RCW 36.07A.030) – essentially within one-half-mile walkshed
of a rail station or one-quarter-mile walkshed of a BRT Station shall be exempt from paying 50
percent of the transportation impact fee.
D. Accessory Dwelling Units as defined by ECC 21.05.015 shall be exempt from paying 50
percent of the park impact fee.
ED. Low-income housing units provided by nonprofit organizations such as, but not limited to,
Habitat for Humanity, shall be exempt from paying 80 percent of the park impact fees under
this chapter. Owners of low-income single-family dwelling units, condominiums and other low-
income housing shall execute and record a lien against the property, in favor of the city, for a
period of 10 years guaranteeing that the dwelling unit will continue to be used for low-income
housing or that impact fees from which the low-income housing is exempted, plus interest,
shall be paid. The lien against the property shall be subordinate only to the lien for general
taxes. In the event that the development is no longer used for low-income rental housing, the
owner shall pay the city the impact fee from which the owner or any prior owner was exempt,
plus interest at the statutory rate. Any claim for an exemption for low-income owner occupied
housing must be made no later than the time of application for a building permit. Any claim not
so made shall be deemed waived.
EF. Early learning facilities shall be exempt from paying 80 percent of street and park impact
fees; provided, that the early learning facility satisfies the conditions of this subsection. Such
exemption shall be conditioned upon the developer recording a covenant that requires that at
least 25 percent of the children and families using the early learning facility qualify for state
subsidized child care, including early childhood education and assistance under Chapter 43.216
RCW, and that provides that if the property is converted to a use other than for an early
learning facility, the property owner must pay the applicable impact fees in effect at the time of
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 76/524
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 76/524
Page 8 of 11
The Edmonds City Code is current through Ordinance 4444, passed August 3, 2026.
conversion, and that also provides that if at any point during a calendar year the early learning
facility does not achieve the required percentage of children and families qualified for state
subsidized child care using the early learning facility, the property owner must pay the
remaining impact fee that would have been imposed on the development had there not been
an exemption. The covenant shall also require the owner to submit an annual report to the city
along with supporting documentation that shows that the early learning facility is in compliance
with the covenant. The covenant shall be an obligation that runs with the land upon which the
early learning facility is located. The covenant shall be in a form acceptable to the city attorney
and shall be recorded upon the developer’s payment of the remaining 20 percent of the impact
fees.
GF. The director shall be authorized to determine whether a particular development activity
falls within an exemption identified in this section, in any other section, or under other
applicable law. Determinations of the director shall be in writing and shall be subject to the
appeals procedures set forth in ECC 3.36.070. [Ord. 4423 § 1, 2026; Ord. 4397 § 5 (Exh. B), 2025; Ord.
4360 § 1 (Exh. A), 2024; Ord. 4268 § 1, 2022; Ord. 4048 § 1, 2016; Ord. 4037 § 1 (Att. A), 2016; Ord. 3934 § 1 (Exh.
A), 2013].
3.36.120 Park impact fee rates.
The park impact fee rates in this section are generated from the formula for calculating impact
fees set forth in the rate study, which is incorporated herein by reference. Except as otherwise
provided for independent fee calculations in ECC 3.36.130, exemptions in ECC 3.36.040 and
credits in ECC 3.36.050, all new developments in the city will be charged the park impact fee
applicable to the type of development as follows:
A. Effective October 1, 2014January 1, 2027:
1. Residential developments (per bedroom in each unit): Single-family house (detached or
attached): $2,734.05 per dwelling unit.
Residential Units by Bedroom
number
0 1 2 3 4 5
Primary Dwelling Unit, cost per
bedroom
$1,077.89 $1,466.27 $1,854.65 $2,243.04 $2,631.42 $3,019.80
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 77/524
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 77/524
Page 9 of 11
The Edmonds City Code is current through Ordinance 4444, passed August 3, 2026.
Accessory Dwelling Unit, cost
per bedroom
$538.94 $733.14 $927.33 $1,121.52 $1,315.71 $1,509.90
2. Accessory dwelling units: $1,367.03 per dwelling unit.
3. Multifamily residential housing (includes all middle housing types): $2,340.16 per
dwelling unit.
24. Nonresidential development (by square footage of use type): $1.97 per square foot.
Use type Rates per 1,000 Gross
Square Feet
Manufacturing $128.01
WTU (Warehousing, Transportation, Utilities) $64.00
Retail $91.43
FIRE (Finance, Insurance, Real Estate) $182.87
Services/Health (exclude food service) $160.01
Government/Education $213.34
Restaurants $320.01
[Ord. 4423 § 1, 2026; Ord. 4397 § 5 (Exh. B), 2025; Ord. 4360 § 1 (Exh. A), 2024; Ord. 4048 § 1, 2016; Ord.
4037 § 1 (Att. A), 2016; Ord. 3934 § 1 (Exh. A), 2013].
B. Bi-Annual: the park impact fee rate schedule shall be updated annually as part of the
biennium budget City of Edmonds development-related fee schedule process using the
following procedure:
1. Fees for any renewal term thereafter shall be adjusted on an annual basis. Such fees
shall increase by the 12 month percentage change set forth in the October-October All-
Urban Consumers Index (CPI-U) for the Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue area .
2. The adjusted impact fee rates shall be effective January 1st.
C. Revised Basis: The park impact fee schedule shall be reviewed, updated, and revised no later
than fivesix years after the effective date of this ordinance. The fee schedule shall be
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 78/524
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 78/524
Page 10 of 11
The Edmonds City Code is current through Ordinance 4444, passed August 3, 2026.
reviewed by the City Council as it deems necessary and appropriate in conjunction with the
update of the Capital Facilities Plan element of the City’s Comprehensive Plan.
The Edmonds City Code is current through Ordinance 4444, passed August 3, 2026.
Disclaimer: The city clerk’s office has the official version of the Edmonds City Code. Users
should contact the city clerk’s office for ordinances passed subsequent to the ordinance cited
above.
City Website: www.edmondswa.gov
Hosted by ICC Code Solutions.
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 79/524
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 79/524
Page 11 of 11
The Edmonds City Code is current through Ordinance 4444, passed August 3, 2026.
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 80/524
Item 5.2
Packet pg. 80/524
1
0
7
8
Agenda Item 7.1
Edmonds City Council
Regular Meeting
October 27, 2026
TITLE:Written Public Comments (Only One Reading Required)
DEPARTMENT:City Council Office
PRESENTER:Teresa Simanton
NEEDED FROM COUNCIL:Informational
RECOMMENDATION:Acknowledge receipt of written public comments submitted
through the City’s online portal.
BUDGET:
Total Dollar Amount:0 ☐ Approved in Budget
Fund(s):N/A ☐ Budget Reallocation Required
☒ No Budget Impact
PROBLEM/ISSUE STATEMENT:
Public comments submitted via the City’s web portal are forwarded by email to all
councilmembers and included in the next regular meeting agenda packet, pending agenda
publication deadline.
CONTEXT, ANALYSIS, & ALTERNATIVES:
Public comments submitted via the City’s web portal are forwarded by email to all
councilmembers and included in the next regular meeting agenda packet, pending agenda
publication deadline.
BUDGET IMPACTS:
N/A
ITEM HISTORY:
N/A
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
ATTACHMENTS:
Online comments received October 9 – October 22, 2026
Item 7.1
Packet pg. 81/524
Item 7.1
Packet pg. 81/524
ONLINE PUBLIC COMMENTS - October 9 – October 22, 2026
Online Form 2026-10-12 11:10 AM(MST) was submitted by Guest on 10/12/2026 2:10:59 PM (GMT-07:00)
US/Arizona
FirstName Pam
LastName Tauer
CityOfResidence Edmonds
AgendaTopic Support for Extension of the Interim Landmark Tree Code
Comments
Dear Edmonds City Council Members, I am writing to express my strong support for
extending Edmonds’ interim landmark tree ordinance for an additional six months. Our
community’s mature trees are an invaluable part of what makes Edmonds special. They
provide shade, absorb carbon, help manage stormwater, support wildlife, reduce urban
heat, and contribute to the beauty and character of our neighborhoods. Once a large,
established tree is removed, it can take generations to replace the environmental
benefits it provided. The interim ordinance offers an important safeguard for landmark
trees while the City continues its work on a comprehensive, permanent tree code.
Allowing these protections to expire before a durable replacement is in place could
result in the irreversible loss of trees that our community cannot afford to lose. I
recognize that developing an effective tree code requires careful consideration of
property owners’ rights, public safety, housing needs, environmental goals, and the
practical realities of tree management. Extending the interim ordinance provides
additional time to address these competing interests thoughtfully and to establish
clear, consistent, and enforceable regulations. Please vote in favor of extending the
interim landmark tree ordinance and maintaining these protections until a
comprehensive, permanent code is ready for adoption. Thank you for your service to
Edmonds and for considering the long-term environmental health, livability, and
character of our city. Sincerely, Pam Tauer Edmonds Resident
To view this form submission online, please follow the link below:
https://edmondswa.gov/form/one.aspx?objectId=21417911&contextId=18452053&returnto=submissions
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
Item 7.1
Packet pg. 82/524
Item 7.1
Packet pg. 82/524
Online Form 2026-10-13 10:07 AM(MST) was submitted by Guest on 10/13/2026 1:07:25 PM (GMT-
07:00) US/Arizona
FirstName Barrett
LastName Speller
CityOfResidence Edmonds
AgendaTopic Esperance Annexation
Comments
Please require a passing vote from the citizens of Esperance in order for the Annexation
to occur. It is imporant to note they have voted it down several times in the past. Just
because Olympia has taken an authoritarian turn, doesn't mean you have to go along
with it, even if it's in you interest. You have a choice to allow their vote to decide or not.
Respect and honor their choice. It is their community, their homes, and their money on
the line. Maybe more freedom and lower costs is a valid choice. The American
federalism model, and vote with your feet, allow for multiple ways to solve problems
(product market fit), control groups (science, statistical testing), etc., and are a release
valve for conflict. Rather than top down control of everything, everywhere, all the time.
This is America, remember? Not China, nor the Soviet Union. Talking with people about
it before forcing is better than not, but it is still force and a lack of consent. Rape and
slavery aren't good, remember? Why force it on them? If it's good for them, won't they
vote for it? That should be the test of its merit.
To view this form submission online, please follow the link below:
https://edmondswa.gov/form/one.aspx?objectId=21418423&contextId=18452053&returnto=subm
issions
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Online Form 2026-10-19 12:43 PM(MST) was submitted by Guest on 10/19/2026 3:43:58 PM (GMT-
07:00) US/Arizona
FirstName Jean
LastName Linhardt
CityOfResidence Edmonds
AgendaTopic Proposed increases for water, Sewer, and storm rates
Item 7.1
Packet pg. 83/524
Item 7.1
Packet pg. 83/524
Comments
I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed increases in water, sewer,
and stormwater rates for Edmonds residents. Enough is enough. Our community
cannot continue to absorb one increase after another without serious consequences.
Property taxes are already extraordinarily high. Electricity, water, insurance, groceries,
and the basic costs of maintaining a home continue to climb. For many of us,
particularly seniors and residents living on fixed incomes, these increases are
becoming unsustainable. I am a homeowner in Edmonds, and I am genuinely
concerned that if these expenses continue to rise, I may eventually be unable to afford
to remain in my own home. I should not have to worry about being priced out of the
home and community I love simply because the cost of living keeps increasing. I
understand that infrastructure must be maintained, essential services must continue,
and costs have increased. However, the responsibility of balancing those costs cannot
continually fall on homeowners and residents who are already struggling to keep up.
Before approving additional increases, I urge the City Council to: * Thoroughly examine
spending and identify meaningful opportunities to reduce expenses. * Provide residents
with a transparent accounting of why these increases are necessary. * Explore
alternative funding sources and prioritize essential infrastructure projects. * Consider
the cumulative financial burden of property taxes, utility bills, and other rising living
expenses. * Establish meaningful protections for seniors and residents on fixed
incomes. We continually hear about the need for affordable housing, but what about
making it possible for people who already own their homes to continue living in them?
Affordability is not just about helping people move into Edmonds. It is also about
ensuring that longtime residents are not financially forced to leave. I respectfully ask the
City Council to reconsider these proposed increases and pursue more affordable
alternatives before asking residents to pay even more. Please remember that behind
every utility bill and property tax statement is a real person, a real household, and a real
financial burden. We cannot continue raising the cost of living without eventually driving
the very people who make Edmonds a community out of their homes. I urge you to
listen to the residents you represent and make affordability a genuine priority. Thank you
for your consideration. I would appreciate a response explaining what specific steps the
City Council intends to take to protect residents from these continued increases.
To view this form submission online, please follow the link below:
https://edmondswa.gov/form/one.aspx?objectId=21422270&contextId=18452053&returnto=subm
issions
Item 7.1
Packet pg. 84/524
Item 7.1
Packet pg. 84/524
October 22, 2026
TO: Edmonds City Council
FR: Edmonds Arts Commission
RE: 2027-28 Mayor’s Proposed Biennium Budget
Earlier this year the Edmonds Arts Commission appeared before the Mayor and City Council to
chronicle the key role the commission has played in shaping Edmond’s Arts and Cultural scene
and laid out our vision for continuing that work. We thank the Council for its recognition of, and
gratitude for our efforts. However, we are disappointed to learn the Mayor’s proposal to deplete the
Municipal Arts fund by the end of the next biennium budget cycle.
Our founding ordinance states, “The City of Edmonds accepts the responsibility for expanding
public experience throughout the broad spectrum of the arts…and as such is hereby declared to be
the policy of the City of Edmonds.”
Under the Powers and Duties section, the commission is empowered to create programs and to
advise and make recommendations to the City on matters regarding arts, culture and heritage.
These are not generic art-related topics to be passively reported to the city, but specifically stated
duties strategically designed to grow and sustain the arts in our community.
To that end, the ordinance states that the City will allocate funds from the General Fund to the
Municipal Arts Fund each annual budget until, “all or a portion of $100,000 in the Municipal Arts
Fund is expended.”
While current tight financial circumstances are acknowledged by the commission, spending down
the Municipal Arts fund below $100,000 means the City is required—per ordinance—to allocate
funds from the General Fund to support the policy of the City spelled out in the arts commission’s
founding code.
While we accept that the onus is on the commission and staff to grow revenues for our programs
and initiatives, we encourage the Council to be our partner in solving the issue by prioritizing
sustainability of our 50-year program and finding a workable option to the issue. For example, as
was done in 2024, splitting the cost of staff salary between the arts fund and the general fund. Or,
determining how much staff time might be booked to the Lodging Tax Fund, as is allowed.
Council’s response to our presentation last spring conveyed their recognition that Edmond’s unique
Artistic and Cultural “spirit” lies at the very heart of what makes Edmonds special, what draws the
crowds to town and the customers that fill the city’s streets and support its businesses.
But all of that –including the public art that graces our streets and parks, the summer concerts,
Write on the Sound that draws attendance from around the country, the State Creative District
designation that proclaims our city’s uniqueness -- and so much more stands to be lost. If your
support for our stated purpose by ordinance is not accompanied by the maintenance of Municipal
Arts Funding, the commission will no longer have the capital necessary to fund the obligation set
forth by ordinance; instead of being stewards of Edmond’s cultural vibrancy, Council may well be
sounding its death knell.
Sincerely,
2026 Edmonds Arts Commission
Item 7.1
Packet pg. 85/524
Item 7.1
Packet pg. 85/524
1
0
6
5
Agenda Item 7.2
Edmonds City Council
Regular Meeting
October 27, 2026
TITLE:Salary Commission Report (Only One Reading Required)
DEPARTMENT:Human Resources
PRESENTER:RaeAnn Duarte
NEEDED FROM COUNCIL:Informational
RECOMMENDATION:Receive the 2026 Salary Commission Report for filing.
BUDGET:
Total Dollar Amount:N/A ☐ Approved in Budget
Fund(s):N/A ☐ Budget Reallocation Required
☒ No Budget Impact
PROBLEM/ISSUE STATEMENT:
The Salary Commission meets periodically, per applicable Edmonds City Code, to set salaries for
the Mayor and City Council. The Salary Commission resumed its work in preparation for the
2027–2028 Biennium Budget and has completed its review, resulting in the determinations
outlined in the 2026 Salary Commission Report.
CONTEXT, ANALYSIS, & ALTERNATIVES:
CW 35.21.015 authorizes cities and towns in Washington State to establish independent
salary commissions to set and adjust the salaries of elected officials, with specific rules for
commission membership, salary changes, and voter referendums. Edmonds City Council has
established, repealed, reestablished, and paused the salary commission at various times over
the years. Most recently, City Council passed Resolution 4376 in December of 2024, pausing the
Salary Commission for the 2025 – 2026 biennium due to budget constraints. As Resolution 4376
will sunset January 1, 2027, the salary commission resumed its work in preparation for the 2027
– 2028 budget biennium planning and adoption. Research and analysis were conducted using
Claude (artificial intelligence) and the City’s Human Resources personnel, at Commission
direction. The methodology, findings, and determinations are presented in the 2026 Salary
Commission Report.
RECOMMENDATION:
Receive the 2026 Salary Commission Report for filing.
BUDGET IMPACTS:
N/A
Item 7.2
Packet pg. 86/524
Item 7.2
Packet pg. 86/524
1
0
6
5
ITEM HISTORY:
This is the first and only reading.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
N/A
ATTACHMENTS:
2026 Salary Commission Report
Item 7.2
Packet pg. 87/524
Item 7.2
Packet pg. 87/524
Item 7.2
Packet pg. 88/524
Item 7.2
Packet pg. 88/524
Item 7.2
Packet pg. 89/524
Item 7.2
Packet pg. 89/524
Item 7.2
Packet pg. 90/524
Item 7.2
Packet pg. 90/524
Item 7.2
Packet pg. 91/524
Item 7.2
Packet pg. 91/524
Item 7.2
Packet pg. 92/524
Item 7.2
Packet pg. 92/524
Item 7.2
Packet pg. 93/524
Item 7.2
Packet pg. 93/524
1
0
7
9
Agenda Item 7.3
Edmonds City Council
Regular Meeting
October 27, 2026
TITLE:August 2026 Monthly Financial Report (Second Reading)
DEPARTMENT:Finance
PRESENTER:Richard Gould
NEEDED FROM COUNCIL:Informational
RECOMMENDATION:Receive for Filing
BUDGET:
Total Dollar Amount:N/A ☐ Approved in Budget
Fund(s):N/A ☐ Budget Reallocation Required
☒ No Budget Impact
PROBLEM/ISSUE STATEMENT:
N/A
CONTEXT, ANALYSIS, & ALTERNATIVES:
N/A
BUDGET IMPACTS:
N/A
ITEM HISTORY:
N/A
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
ATTACHMENTS:
August 2026 Monthly Financial Report
Item 7.3
Packet pg. 94/524
Item 7.3
Packet pg. 94/524
CITY OF EDMONDS
AUGUST 2026 FINANCIAL REPORT
FY 2026 August
August 31, 2026
Item 7.3
Packet pg. 95/524
Item 7.3
Packet pg. 95/524
1
Table of Contents
Financial Status Analys ................................ 2
Monthly Highlights ...................................... 3
2025-2026 Biennial Budget Summary ......... 4
All Funds Financial Summary ....................... 5
General Fund Summaries ............................ 6
Development Services Revenue Summary .. 8
Major Revenue Summaries ......................... 9
All Revenue Summary ............................... 12
All Expenditure Summary .......................... 14
Salaries and Benefits Summaries .............. 16
Debt Summary ........................................... 20
Interfund Loan Summary ........................... 21
Investment Portfolio Summary ................. 22
General Fund (001) Cash Flows Report ..... 24
Public Works Capital Projects .................... 26
Appendix A ................................................ 27
Item 7.3
Packet pg. 96/524
Item 7.3
Packet pg. 96/524
2026 August/ Report - Financial Status Analysis
The following analysis concerns the August-2026 financial report. Provided is a summary of financial activity
through August 31st. The total fund balance has increased by $16.5m as of August 31st. In the 2026 amended budget the
City is projected to see a increase in fund balance of $12m (for the entire biennium of 2025/2026) by year end. Looking
at the “All Funds Financial” summary statement you can see that the most significant reasons for this current difference
can be found in the General Fund ($2.5m), The 3-Utilities funds ($10.7m) and the Reet Funds (125/126) $1.7m. The
total fund balance increase is primarily due to capital projects pushed to the next biennium and some revenues coming
in over budget in the (oo1) general fund:
•Interest Income continues to decline from 2025 (as of this date), down 4.2% (approximately 83k). This is due
to 2 factors: (1) Multiple bonds with higher (over 4%) interest rates maturing and (2) Interest rates had declined
in 2025 and earlier in 2026. However with rates now increasing we were able to replace two of the bonds that
had matured with higher interest rate bonds so we should see this declining trend reverse in the coming months.
•Labor costs as of August 31st YTD (year to date) Labor costs are under budget near 7% for August and the
General Fund is under budget by 5%. The General Fund is over budget in just one department by 25% (City
Administrator) by $114k. These changes have been discussed. Through August, salaries and benefits totaled
$20,210,803 for the General Fund which is $(1,636,040) less than we would have expected through this
point. This is due to leaving additional approved and funded positions vacant in 2026. For all funds we have
spent $(3,159,207) less than we would have expected through this point.
•Revenues & Expenditures - The “All Revenue Summary” shows that the City of Edmonds is under
expectations at 2.7% (this is primarily due to Street Construction (112) & Storm (422)). The 2026
appropriations budget is 16.1% below budget expectations (capital projects pushed). The General Fund is
under budget by 4.7% due primarily to labor as can be seen in the “All Expenditure Summary”.
•Sales Tax trending – August sales taxes were up by 9.2% ($183k) from 2025. This is a trend that started
earlier in 2026 and was not predicted so is being watched closely. We did receive September’s for 2026, and it
is up from 2025 by 9.1% ($785k). Sales taxes surged early in 2026 and remains consistent. Good news indeed.
•Development Services – exceeded expectations by (62.3%). These revenues exceed those from August YTD
in 2025 by 61% ($1m). Building permits, building plan review & inspection and engineering inspections lead
the way in this significant increase.
The Parks and Public Works Capital Projects reports used for tracking by the Finance Department will be included
with the third quarter reports due to the time it takes to prepare them and that changes do not often happen monthly. In a
joint effort with Public Works, we are providing information and data on which projects were delayed and why. This is
included in Exhibit “A” which will now also be included with Quarterly reports.
The Biennial Analysis for the labor and benefits costs as well as fund revenues and expenditures will be presented in
the third quarter report through month 21 of the 2025/2026 Biennium. The revenue and expenditure reports are included
on pages 13 and 15. We will also include a Labor and Benefits analysis.
The cash flow report for the General Fund (page 24) shows that the actual/projected numbers are trending above initial
budget by nearly $4m.
Please let me know if you have any questions. I look forward to discussing this with you at the Committee Meeting on
October 20th.
Thank you.
Richard A. Gould
Finance Director
2
Item 7.3
Packet pg. 97/524
Item 7.3
Packet pg. 97/524
3
MONTHLY HIGHLIGHTS
GENERAL FUND HIGHLIGHTS
•Sales Tax is up $703,811 from this point last year and is $695,067 over the cumulative budget forecast of $7,656,136 for sales tax
revenues. We are currently trending 9.20% over 2025 for sales collections through August.
•Development Services related revenues are $1,024,559 more than they were to this point in 2025. Through August, we are 67% of
the year complete, but have received 129% of the budgeted Development Services revenues, or $1,266,062 over the $1,347,533 that
would be expected through this point.
•Charges for Services revenues in the General Fund are down $(17,362) from 2025; this difference is less than we would have expected
due to the large increase in Development Services revenues to this point. We would expect this revenue source to be lower due to no
longer receiving EMS Transport Fees in 2026. Through August of 2025, we had received $1,188,168 in revenues from this revenue
source.
•General Fund Interfund Loan – The City began repayment of this loan in January of 2026; the outstanding balance on the principal as
of the end of July is $4,000,000. Total interest to date that will be charged for this loan is $410,681; the City has paid $177,376 of this
interest as of the end of August.
•Through August, salaries and benefits totaled $20,210,803 for the General Fund which is $(1,636,040) less than we would have
expected through this point. This is due to leaving additional approved and funded positions vacant in 2026. For all funds we have
spent $(3,159,207) less than we would have expected through this point.
Sales Tax Property Tax Other Taxes
Actual 8,351,203 6,407,473 9,392,371
Budget 11,700,000 11,713,393 13,222,116
-
2,000,000
4,000,000
6,000,000
8,000,000
10,000,000
12,000,000
14,000,000
Ax
i
s
T
i
t
l
e
General Fund Tax Revenue (2026 YTD)
Source
2026 Amended
Budget
8/31/2025
Revenues
8/31/2026
Revenues
Amount
Remaining % Received
TAXES $ 36,635,509 $ 22,742,453 $ 24,151,047 $ 12,484,462 66%
LICENSES AND PERMITS 1,965,050 1,450,042 1,635,373 329,677 83%
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUES 1,248,653 1,072,450 659,294 589,359 53%
CHARGES FOR GOODS AND SERVICES 7,825,347 5,605,162 5,587,800 2,237,547 71%
FINES AND PENALTIES 2,888,000 1,069,647 1,837,186 1,050,814 64%
MISCELLANEOUS REVENUES 838,381 626,669 724,242 114,139 86%
OTHER INCREASES IN FUND RESOURCES - 6,000,000 - - 0%
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 50,000 69,968 - 50,000 0%
51,450,940$ 38,636,391$ 34,594,942$ 16,855,998$ 67%
CITY OF EDMONDS
REVENUES - GENERAL FUND - BY SOURCE IN SUMMARY
Item 7.3
Packet pg. 98/524
Item 7.3
Packet pg. 98/524
4
001 General Fund 1,336,357$ 110,617,025$ 91,894,546$ 106,752,322$ 86,810,640$ 914,021$ (2,046,612)$
009 LEOFF Medical Insurance Reserve Subfund 19,441 737,000 600,000 756,000 611,444 24,944 1,444
011 Risk Management Reserve Fund - - - - - - -
012 Contingency Reserve Fund 2,228,672 - - - - 2,228,672 2,228,672
014 Historic Preservation Gift Fund 4,559 - - 11,400 - (1,141) 4,559
016 Building Maintenance Fund 2,380,534 194,410 123,972 2,714,068 939,137 448,913 2,204,843
017 Marsh Restoration & Preservation Fund 861,616 50,000 - 183,960 7,258 806,117 854,357
018 Edmonds Homelessness Response Fund 200,000 - - 196,425 109,610 82,340 90,665
019 Edmonds Opioid Response Fund 456,556 100,000 164,812 450,000 - 541,619 541,619
Total General Fund 7,487,735 111,698,435 92,783,330 111,064,175 88,478,090 5,045,484 3,879,546
104 Drug Enforcement Fund 47,981 9,400 3,994 40,000 14,765 34,035 49,425
111 Street Fund 177,530 5,545,000 4,357,945 5,374,146 3,510,773 992,838 621,524
112 Street Construction Fund 3,211,126 12,153,779 4,166,767 11,206,049 2,824,305 4,139,154 3,766,445
117 Municipal Arts Acquisition Fund 671,730 548,241 201,746 768,927 379,799 424,236 655,828
120 Hotel/Motel Tax Fund 165,422 258,410 221,029 305,000 252,262 149,380 131,470
121 Employee Parking Permit Fund 12,691 110,290 43,473 65,173 24,314 22,008 461
122 Youth Scholarship Fund 20,769 4,750 2,489 6,000 300 21,521 22,181
123 Tourism Promotional Arts Fund 151,599 57,970 83,841 84,800 52,299 135,906 174,466
125 REET 2 2,432,519 3,787,950 3,535,022 3,330,424 1,314,887 4,282,291 3,676,805
126 REET 1 4,631,092 4,043,320 3,705,277 4,146,945 2,355,768 5,930,876 5,174,891
127 Gifts Catalog Fund 3,027,911 677,940 2,396,161 1,298,953 700,863 4,445,870 4,773,527
130 Cemetery Maintenance/Imp. Fund 130,453 675,719 785,442 671,945 568,380 248,448 388,822
137 Cemetery Maintenance Fund 1,269,638 183,761 121,987 461,124 276,432 996,992 1,075,068
138 Sister City Commission Fund 17,896 17,540 6,824 14,800 - 22,833 24,003
140 Business Improvement District Fund 34,037 158,418 129,859 173,320 129,465 19,368 26,034
141 Affordable Housing Fund 380,831 130,000 110,509 - - 527,814 462,814
142 Edmonds Rescue Plan Fund 833 - 9,167 - - 10,000 10,000
143 Tree Fund 135,348 141,761 328,130 150,000 112,726 367,460 384,201
Total Special Revenue Funds 16,519,406 28,504,249 20,209,661 28,097,606 12,517,339 22,771,028 21,417,963
DE
B
T
SE
R
V
I
C
E
FU
N
D
S
231 2012 LTGO Debt Service Fund - 607,760 337,141 607,760 337,141 350 -
CA
P
I
T
A
L
PR
O
J
E
C
T
FU
N
D
S
332 Parks Capital Construction Fund 299,964 684,482 778,610 237,035 67,814 537,270 328,410
411 Combined Utility Operations - - 94,470 - - - -
421 Water Utility Fund 39,451,533 25,144,575 25,279,642 41,240,704 23,857,897 38,368,119 43,757,274
422 Storm Utility Fund 23,214,849 20,874,042 16,919,490 23,800,916 14,791,258 26,549,925 26,150,921
423 Sewer/WWTP Utility Fund 80,547,614 39,829,016 34,815,186 40,183,800 28,887,716 84,818,738 84,371,349
424 Utility Debt Service Fund 843,961 2,323,310 1,386,054 2,297,790 1,386,053 843,961 843,961
Total Enterprise Funds 144,057,957 88,170,943 78,494,842 107,523,210 68,922,924 150,580,742 155,123,504
511 Equipment Rental Fund 11,867,486 4,889,190 4,598,143 4,121,587 3,351,526 12,836,286 12,305,347
512 Technology Rental Fund 1,252,104 5,077,196 4,072,005 5,010,600 3,433,260 1,681,309 1,790,223
Total Internal Service Funds 13,119,590 9,966,386 8,670,148 9,132,187 6,784,786 14,517,594 14,095,569
181,484,652$ 239,632,255$ 201,273,732$ 256,661,973$ 177,108,094$ 193,452,469$ 194,844,993$
2025-2026 BIENNIAL BUDGET SUMMARY - ALL FUNDS
GE
N
E
R
A
L
F
U
N
D
SP
E
C
I
A
L
R
E
V
E
N
U
E
F
U
N
D
S
EN
T
E
R
P
R
I
S
E
FU
N
D
S
*The above 2026 budget and ending fund balances for Funds 001, 421 and 422 have been adjusted to reflect year-end reporting for the interfund loan. This
TOTAL
2025
Beginning
Fund Balance
2025-2026
Adopted
Revenue
Budget
2025-2026
Adopted
Expense
BudgetFund
all other pages reflect full budget.
IN
T
E
R
N
A
L
S
E
R
V
I
C
E
F
U
N
D
S
2025
Unaudited
Ending
Fund Balance
2025-2026
Actual
Revenues
Period 1-20
2025-2026
Actual
Expenses
Period 1-20
2026
Estimated
Ending
Fund Balance
is to provide a more accurate estimate for ending fund balance for these three funds as of the end of 2026. This is only reflected in this manner for this chart;
Item 7.3
Packet pg. 99/524
Item 7.3
Packet pg. 99/524
5
City of Edmonds
All Funds Financial Summary
As of August 31, 2026
Fund
Beginning Fund
Balance*
Revenues /
Sources
Expenditures /
Uses
Revenues less
Expenditures
Ending Fund
Balance
Governmental
001 General Fund (2,046,612) 34,594,942 32,139,282 2,455,660 409,047
009 LEOFF Medical Insurance Reserve 1,444 280,000 273,447 6,553 7,997
012 Contingency Reserve 2,228,672 - - - 2,228,672
014 Historic Sub-Fund 4,559 - - - 4,559
016 Building Maintenance 2,204,843 45,220 684,694 (639,474) 1,565,369
017 Marsh Restoration 854,357 - - - 854,357
018 Homeless Response 90,665 - 275 (275) 90,390
019 Opioid Response 541,619 79,749 - 79,749 621,368
Total General Fund and Subfunds 3,879,546 34,999,911 33,097,699 1,902,212 5,781,759
Special Revenue Funds
104 Drug Enforcement 49,425 1,182 13,615 (12,433) 36,993
111 Street 621,524 1,927,438 1,525,330 402,108 1,023,633
112 Street Construction 3,766,445 1,345,317 666,563 678,754 4,445,199
117 Municipal Arts 655,828 27,063 193,303 (166,240) 489,588
120 Hotel / Motel 131,470 79,722 79,335 388 131,857
121 Employee Parking 461 30,897 - 30,897 31,358
122 Youth Scholarship 22,181 704 - 704 22,884
123 Tourism Promotion 174,466 30,839 22,744 8,095 182,561
125 REET 2 3,676,805 1,393,847 414,137 979,710 4,656,515
126 REET 1 5,174,891 1,439,527 700,563 738,963 5,913,854
127 Gifts Catalog 4,773,527 249,183 278,905 (29,722) 4,743,805
130 Cemetery Maintenance 388,822 249,536 286,098 (36,563) 352,259
137 Cemetery Trust 1,075,068 34,158 4,258 29,899 1,104,967
138 Sister City 24,003 753 - 753 24,757
140 Business Improvement 26,034 53,470 45,072 8,398 34,431
141 Affordable Housing 462,814 40,426 - 40,426 503,240
142 Edmonds Rescue 10,000 - - - 10,000
143 Tree Fund 384,201 16,005 45,083 (29,079) 355,122
Capital Projects 328,410 627,111 - 627,111 955,521
Debt Service - 30,939 30,939 - -
Enterprise Funds
411 Combined Utility Operation - 94,470 - 94,470 94,470
421 Water Utility 43,757,274 11,612,881 6,458,494 5,154,387 48,911,661
422 Storm Water Utility 26,150,921 8,132,237 5,172,271 2,959,967 29,110,888
423 Sewer / Wastewater Treatment Plant 84,371,349 14,424,776 11,797,657 2,627,118 86,998,468
424 Bond Reserve Fund 843,961 236,686 236,684 1 843,962
Internal Service Funds
511 Equipment Rental 12,305,347 1,680,480 1,366,454 314,026 12,619,373
512 Technology Rental 1,790,223 1,663,251 1,500,727 162,523 1,952,746
All Funds 194,844,993 80,422,808 63,935,932 16,486,876 211,331,869
*All Beginning Fund Balance amounts reflect the ending balances from the unaudited 2025 Financial Statements.
$200,000 of the Fund Balance in Fund 126 has been reserved for Marsh Restoration Funding, as well as $1,200,000 for the purchase of Open Space.
$250,000 of the Fund Balance in Fund 422 has been reserved for Marsh Restoration Funding.
Item 7.3
Packet pg. 100/524
Item 7.3
Packet pg. 100/524
6
GENERAL FUND DEPARTMENT EXPENSE SUMMARY
Title
2026 Amended
Budget
8/31/2025
Expenditures
8/31/2026
Expenditures
Amount
Remaining % Spent
CITY COUNCIL 467,379$ 300,044$ 305,074$ 162,305$ 65%
OFFICE OF MAYOR 498,288 315,919 313,315 184,973 63%
HUMAN RESOURCES 1,107,619 640,938 651,739 455,880 59%
CITY ADMINISTRATOR 633,737 - 487,199 146,538 77%
CITY ATTORNEY 1,326,346 688,240 741,765 584,581 56%
CITY CLERK 750,649 - 432,659 317,990 58%
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES 1,560,772 1,464,726 1,163,999 396,773 75%
NON-DEPARTMENTAL 6,955,912 10,329,709 4,822,215 2,133,697 69%
POLICE SERVICES 18,498,299 11,508,849 11,688,285 6,810,014 63%
MUNICIPAL COURT 2,553,298 1,202,093 1,609,423 943,875 63%
SATELLITE OFFICE - 8,557 - - 0%
COMMUNITY SERVICES/ECONOMIC DEV.- 612,518 - - 0%
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT 4,326,185 2,128,301 2,506,509 1,819,676 58%
HUMAN SERVICES PROGRAM - 104,002 - - 0%
PARKS & RECREATION 5,167,117 3,224,270 3,145,929 2,021,188 61%
PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION 883,360 544,916 577,961 305,399 65%
FACILITIES MAINTENANCE 2,606,747 1,561,825 1,512,403 1,094,344 58%
ENGINEERING 4,154,599 2,098,442 2,180,807 1,973,792 52%
51,490,307$ 36,733,349$ 32,139,282$ 19,351,025$ 62%
EXPENDITURES - GENERAL FUND - BY DEPARTMENT IN SUMMARY
CITY OF EDMONDS
Item 7.3
Packet pg. 101/524
Item 7.3
Packet pg. 101/524
7
GENERAL FUND SUMMARY
General Fund - Fund 001 Only
Cumulative Monthly Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Trend Budget Trend Actuals Actuals %
January 5,092,205$ 5,092,205$ 2,714,712$ 2,714,712$ -46.69%
February 8,880,277 3,788,073 3,599,318 6,314,029 -28.90%
March 12,749,331 3,869,053 5,086,550 11,400,579 -10.58%
April 21,246,923 8,497,592 8,246,184 19,646,763 -7.53%
May 25,225,825 3,978,902 4,158,304 23,805,067 -5.63%
June 28,148,925 2,923,100 3,844,590 27,649,657 -1.77%
July 30,804,734 2,655,809 3,366,110 31,015,767 0.69%
August 33,606,336 2,801,602 3,579,175 34,594,942 2.94%
September 36,605,232 2,998,896 3,087,116 37,682,058 2.94%
October 45,224,778 8,619,546 8,873,109 46,555,167 2.94%
November 48,602,351 3,377,573 3,476,932 50,032,098 2.94%
December 51,450,940 2,848,589 2,932,387 52,964,485 2.94%
51,450,940$
General Fund - Fund 001 Only
Cumulative Monthly Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Trend Budget Trend Actuals Actuals %
January 4,887,949$ 4,887,949$ 4,678,204$ 4,678,204$ -4.29%
February 8,800,118 3,912,169 4,100,965 8,779,169 -0.24%
March 13,149,106 4,348,988 3,750,362 12,529,530 -4.71%
April 17,128,517 3,979,411 3,887,023 16,416,554 -4.16%
May 21,233,715 4,105,198 3,887,944 20,304,498 -4.38%
June 25,636,087 4,402,372 4,133,349 24,437,847 -4.67%
July 29,450,694 3,814,607 4,028,401 28,466,248 -3.34%
August 33,420,596 3,969,903 3,673,034 32,139,282 -3.83%
September 37,709,447 4,288,851 4,124,420 36,263,702 -3.83%
October 42,104,379 4,394,932 4,226,434 40,490,137 -3.83%
November 46,571,226 4,466,848 4,295,593 44,785,730 -3.83%
December 51,490,307 4,919,081 4,730,488 49,516,218 -3.83%
51,490,307$
*The monthly budget trend columns are based on a two year trend.
2026
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Revenue Summary-General Fund
2026
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Summary-General Fund
*The monthly budget trend column is based on a two year trend which covers 2024 and 2025. As we received the full $6M interfund loan during January and
February in 2025, this has effected the estimated flows of revenues coming in during 2026 and assumes a larger than normal amount of budget will be coming
in during January and February of 2026. Through August we are currently right at budget with receiving 67% of budget and being 67% of the year complete.
Please also note that the monthly report is cash basis and does not reflect accruals or adjustments done for year-end financial reporting. Due to this, the "prior
year" green line reflects the $6M interfund loan as being recorded as revenue to the general fund. For year-end financial reporting, this was moved to a balance
sheet account.
0
5,000,000
10,000,000
15,000,000
20,000,000
25,000,000
30,000,000
35,000,000
40,000,000
45,000,000
50,000,000
55,000,000
60,000,000
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
General Fund -Fund 001 only
Current Year Budget Prior Year
0
5,000,000
10,000,000
15,000,000
20,000,000
25,000,000
30,000,000
35,000,000
40,000,000
45,000,000
50,000,000
55,000,000
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
General Fund -Fund 001 Only
Current Year Budget Prior Year
Item 7.3
Packet pg. 102/524
Item 7.3
Packet pg. 102/524
8
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES REVENUE SUMMARY
Source
2026 Amended
Budget
8/31/2025
Revenues
8/31/2026
Revenues
Amount
Remaining % Received
DEV SERV PERMIT SURCHARGE 90,000$ 91,141$ 90,342$ (342)$ 100%
RIGHT OF WAY FRANCHISE FEE 30,000 34,183 32,631 (2,631) 109%
BUILDING PERMITS 40,000 100,542 148,064 (108,064) 370%
FIRE PERMIT 5,000 - - 5,000 0%
ENGINEERING PERMIT 108,300 18,274 14,514 93,786 13%
ENG PERMIT - RIGHT OF WAY - 82,553 71,868 (71,868) 0%
ENG PERMIT - ENCROACHMENT - 1,233 3,432 (3,432) 0%
ENG PERMIT - STREET USE - 548 5,041 (5,041) 0%
STREET AND CURB PERMIT - 293 - - 0%
STREET AND CURB PERMIT W/LEASEHOLD 10,000 - - 10,000 0%
ENGINEERING FEES AND CHARGES - 1,528 - - 0%
FIRE CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION FEES 10,000 29,120 29,177 (19,177) 292%
ZONING/SUBDIVISION FEE - 1,205 858 (858) 0%
BUILDING PLAN REVIEW AND INSPECTION 1,160,000 788,495 1,690,914 (530,914) 146%
BUILDING PEER PLAN REVIEW - 6,680 6,893 (6,893) 0%
FIRE PLAN REVIEW 25,000 29,209 55,692 (30,692) 223%
PLANNING REVIEW AND INSPECTION 110,000 59,836 63,792 46,208 58%
PLANNING PEER PLAN REVIEW - 11,000 4,422 (4,422) 0%
S.E.P.A. REVIEW 6,000 3,668 - 6,000 0%
ENG PLAN REVIEWS 210,000 82,119 40,941 169,059 19%
ENGINEERING PEER PLAN REVIEW 200,000 123,458 109,241 90,759 55%
ENG INSPECTIONS - 111,149 227,182 (227,182) 0%
CRITICAL AREA STUDY 17,000 12,803 18,590 (1,590) 109%
2,021,300$ 1,589,037$ 2,613,596$ (592,296)$ 129%
CITY OF EDMONDS
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES REVENUES SUMMARY
Item 7.3
Packet pg. 103/524
Item 7.3
Packet pg. 103/524
9
MAJOR REVENUE SUMMARY
Property Tax
The timing of recording property tax revenues changed in 2023 to be recorded in the month that they were for versus the month that
the payment was received. This is the reason for the difference between the years 2022, and 2023-2026. The large difference between
2026 and prior years is due to no longer receiving the EMS property tax levy with the move to the RFA.
$8,098,438 $8,222,659 $8,519,684 $8,783,749
$6,436,751
-
1,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
3,000,000.00
4,000,000.00
5,000,000.00
6,000,000.00
7,000,000.00
8,000,000.00
9,000,000.00
10,000,000.00
2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Property Tax Revenues (January through August)
Sales Tax
In the next chart, sales tax is up 9.20% from this point in time in 2025. This is up from last year when it was up -.69% at this point.
$5,569,038
$5,184,289
$6,634,250 $7,348,080
$7,597,605 $7,700,256 $7,647,392 $8,351,203
-
1,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
3,000,000.00
4,000,000.00
5,000,000.00
6,000,000.00
7,000,000.00
8,000,000.00
9,000,000.00
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 YTD 2026
Sales Tax Revenues (January through August)
Item 7.3
Packet pg. 104/524
Item 7.3
Packet pg. 104/524
10
MAJOR REVENUE SUMMARY
Charges for Services
A larger difference is expected between 2026 and prior years due to no longer receiving EMS Transport Fees with the move to the RFA.
Due to receiving a larger increase in Development Services revenues through August, this has lowered this difference.
$3,831,933
$4,936,444 $5,489,893 $5,605,162 $5,587,800
-
700,000.00
1,400,000.00
2,100,000.00
2,800,000.00
3,500,000.00
4,200,000.00
4,900,000.00
5,600,000.00
6,300,000.00
7,000,000.00
2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Charges for Services Revenues (January through August )
Water Utility Tax
The large difference between 2026 and prior years is due to the increase in Utility Tax from 10% to 20% that will sunset on December
31, 2028.
$575,820 $633,755 $670,466 $732,920
$1,591,750
-
200,000.00
400,000.00
600,000.00
800,000.00
1,000,000.00
1,200,000.00
1,400,000.00
1,600,000.00
1,800,000.00
2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Water Utility Tax Revenues (January through August)
Item 7.3
Packet pg. 105/524
Item 7.3
Packet pg. 105/524
11
MAJOR REVENUE SUMMARY
Sewer Utility Tax
The large difference between 2026 and prior years is due to the increase in Utility Tax from 10% to 20% that will sunset on December
31, 2028.
$640,633 $673,646 $748,317 $821,034
$1,820,636
-
200,000
400,000
600,000
800,000
1,000,000
1,200,000
1,400,000
1,600,000
1,800,000
2,000,000
2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Sewer Utility Tax Revenues (January through August)
Real Estate Excise Tax
Real Estate Excise Taxes (REET) are collected from all real estate transactions. The utilization of this revenue is restricted to capital
projects and projects identified in the capital facilities plan. Real Estate Excise Tax is down -8.24% from this point in time last year.
$3,453,870
$2,333,624
$1,854,598
$2,314,505
$2,765,886 $2,538,063
-
400,000.00
800,000.00
1,200,000.00
1,600,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,400,000.00
2,800,000.00
3,200,000.00
3,600,000.00
4,000,000.00
2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Real Estate Excise Taxes (January through August)
Item 7.3
Packet pg. 106/524
Item 7.3
Packet pg. 106/524
12
ALL REVENUE SUMMARY
Fund
No.Title
2026 Amended
Budget
8/31/2025
Revenues
8/31/2026
Revenues
Amount
Remaining % Received
001 GENERAL FUND 51,450,940$ 38,636,391$ 34,594,942$ 16,855,998$ 67%
009 LEOFF-MEDICAL INS. RESERVE 462,000 175,000 280,000 182,000 61%
016 BUILDING MAINTENANCE FUND 94,070 53,713 45,220 48,850 48%
017 MARSH RESTORATION & PRESERVATION FUND 50,000 - - 50,000 0%
019 EDMONDS OPIOID RESPONSE FUND 50,000 77,004 79,749 (29,749) 159%
104 DRUG ENFORCEMENT FUND 4,610 2,012 1,182 3,428 26%
111 STREET FUND 3,105,000 1,644,396 1,927,438 1,177,562 62%
112 COMBINED STREET CONST/IMPROVE 9,027,861 2,230,490 1,345,317 7,682,544 15%
117 MUNICIPAL ARTS ACQUIS. FUND 121,420 143,856 27,063 94,357 22%
120 HOTEL/MOTEL TAX REVENUE FUND 128,910 87,400 79,722 49,188 62%
121 EMPLOYEE PARKING PERMIT FUND 54,950 11,710 30,897 24,053 56%
122 YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP FUND 2,340 1,120 704 1,636 30%
123 TOURISM PROMOTIONAL FUND/ARTS 8,740 33,253 30,839 (22,099) 353%
125 REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 2 2,139,330 1,501,310 1,393,847 745,483 65%
126 REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 1 2,262,900 1,592,646 1,439,527 823,373 64%
127 GIFTS CATALOG FUND 332,360 2,059,734 249,183 83,177 75%
130 CEMETERY MAINTENANCE/IMPROVEMT 202,562 166,789 249,536 (46,974) 123%
137 CEMETERY MAINTENANCE TRUST FD 96,924 66,912 34,158 62,766 35%
138 SISTER CITY COMMISSION 6,230 750 753 5,477 12%
140 BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 79,209 59,108 53,470 25,739 68%
141 AFFORDABLE AND SUPPORTIVE HOUSING FUND 65,000 34,856 40,426 24,574 62%
142 EDMONDS RESCUE PLAN FUND - 9,167 - - 0%
143 TREE FUND 58,259 305,345 16,005 42,254 27%
231 2012 LT GO DEBT SERVICE FUND 301,890 33,276 30,939 270,951 10%
332 PARKS CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION FUND 335,860 116,205 627,111 (291,251) 187%
411 COMBINED UTILITY OPERATION - 91,775 94,470 (94,470) 0%
421 WATER UTILITY FUND 15,030,903 8,649,273 11,612,881 3,418,022 77%
422 STORM UTILITY FUND 12,850,528 6,366,938 8,132,237 4,718,291 63%
423 SEWER/WWTP UTILITY FUND 20,499,448 13,225,436 14,424,776 6,074,672 70%
424 BOND RESERVE FUND 1,148,390 249,802 236,686 911,704 21%
511 EQUIPMENT RENTAL FUND 2,512,920 2,094,083 1,680,480 832,440 67%
512 TECHNOLOGY RENTAL FUND 2,673,614 1,608,931 1,663,251 1,010,363 62%
125,157,168$ 81,328,683$ 80,422,808 44,734,360$ 64%
CITY OF EDMONDS
REVENUES BY FUND - SUMMARY
Item 7.3
Packet pg. 107/524
Item 7.3
Packet pg. 107/524
13
ALL REVENUE SUMMARY
Fund
No.Title
2025-2026
Adopted Revenue
Budget
2025-2026
Actual Revenues
Period 1-20
Amount
Remaining % Received
001 GENERAL FUND 110,617,025$ 91,894,546$ 18,722,479$ 83%
009 LEOFF-MEDICAL INS. RESERVE 737,000 600,000 137,000 81%
016 BUILDING MAINTENANCE FUND 194,410 123,972 70,439 64%
017 MARSH RESTORATION & PRESERVATION FUND 50,000 - 50,000 0%
019 EDMONDS OPIOID RESPONSE FUND 100,000 164,812 (64,812) 165%
104 DRUG ENFORCEMENT FUND 9,400 3,994 5,406 42%
111 STREET FUND 5,545,000 4,357,945 1,187,055 79%
112 COMBINED STREET CONST/IMPROVE 12,153,779 4,166,767 7,987,012 34%
117 MUNICIPAL ARTS ACQUIS. FUND 548,241 201,746 346,495 37%
120 HOTEL/MOTEL TAX REVENUE FUND 258,410 221,029 37,381 86%
121 EMPLOYEE PARKING PERMIT FUND 110,290 43,473 66,817 39%
122 YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP FUND 4,750 2,489 2,261 52%
123 TOURISM PROMOTIONAL FUND/ARTS 57,970 83,841 (25,871) 145%
125 REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 2 3,787,950 3,535,022 252,928 93%
126 REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 1 4,043,320 3,705,277 338,043 92%
127 GIFTS CATALOG FUND 677,940 2,396,161 (1,718,221) 353%
130 CEMETERY MAINTENANCE/IMPROVEMT 675,719 785,442 (109,723) 116%
137 CEMETERY MAINTENANCE TRUST FD 183,761 121,987 61,774 66%
138 SISTER CITY COMMISSION 17,540 6,824 10,716 39%
140 BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 158,418 129,859 28,559 82%
141 AFFORDABLE AND SUPPORTIVE HOUSING FUND 130,000 110,509 19,491 85%
142 EDMONDS RESCUE PLAN FUND - 9,167 (9,167) 0%
143 TREE FUND 141,761 328,130 (186,369) 231%
231 2012 LT GO DEBT SERVICE FUND 607,760 337,141 270,619 55%
332 PARKS CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION FUND 684,482 778,610 (94,128) 114%
411 COMBINED UTILITY OPERATION - 94,470 (94,470) 0%
421 WATER UTILITY FUND 26,394,575 25,279,642 1,114,933 96%
422 STORM UTILITY FUND 22,624,042 16,919,490 5,704,552 75%
423 SEWER/WWTP UTILITY FUND 39,829,016 34,815,186 5,013,830 87%
424 BOND RESERVE FUND 2,323,310 1,386,054 937,256 60%
511 EQUIPMENT RENTAL FUND 4,889,190 4,598,143 291,047 94%
512 TECHNOLOGY RENTAL FUND 5,077,196 4,072,005 1,005,191 80%
242,632,255$ 201,273,732$ 41,358,523$ 83%
CITY OF EDMONDS
REVENUES BY FUND - BIENNIAL SUMMARY
Item 7.3
Packet pg. 108/524
Item 7.3
Packet pg. 108/524
14
ALL EXPENDITURE SUMMARY
Fund
No.Title
2026 Amended
Budget
8/31/2025
Expenditures
8/31/2026
Expenditures
Amount
Remaining % Spent
001 GENERAL FUND 51,490,307$ 36,733,349$ 32,139,282$ 19,351,025$ 62%
009 LEOFF-MEDICAL INS. RESERVE 438,500 184,725 273,447 165,053 62%
011 RISK MANAGEMENT RESERVE FUND - - - - 0%
014 HISTORIC PRESERVATION GIFT FUND 5,700 - - 5,700 0%
016 BUILDING MAINTENANCE FUND 1,850,000 225,157 684,694 1,165,306 37%
017 MARSH RESTORATION & PRESERVATION FUND 98,240 - - 98,240 0%
018 EDMONDS HOMELESSNESS RESPONSE FUND 8,325 70,264 275 8,050 3%
019 EDMONDS OPIOID RESPONSE FUND 50,000 - - 50,000 0%
104 DRUG ENFORCEMENT FUND 20,000 1,150 13,615 6,385 68%
111 STREET FUND 2,733,686 1,375,389 1,525,330 1,208,356 56%
112 COMBINED STREET CONST/IMPROVE 8,655,152 1,543,025 666,563 7,988,589 8%
117 MUNICIPAL ARTS ACQUIS. FUND 353,012 144,923 193,303 159,709 55%
120 HOTEL/MOTEL TAX REVENUE FUND 111,000 55,934 79,335 31,665 71%
121 EMPLOYEE PARKING PERMIT FUND 33,403 2,002 - 33,403 0%
122 YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP FUND 3,000 300 - 3,000 0%
123 TOURISM PROMOTIONAL FUND/ARTS 47,300 13,249 22,744 24,556 48%
125 REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 2 1,533,844 678,548 414,137 1,119,707 27%
126 REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 1 1,506,915 683,659 700,563 806,352 46%
127 GIFTS CATALOG FUND 660,017 294,519 278,905 381,112 42%
130 CEMETERY MAINTENANCE/IMPROVEMT 342,936 191,488 286,098 56,838 83%
137 CEMETERY MAINTENANCE TRUST FUND 175,000 11,050 4,258 170,742 2%
138 SISTER CITY COMMISSION 7,400 - - 7,400 0%
140 BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 85,875 51,384 45,072 40,803 52%
142 EDMONDS RESCUE PLAN FUND - - - - 0%
143 TREE FUND 75,000 11,072 45,083 29,917 60%
231 2012 LT GO DEBT SERVICE FUND 301,540 33,276 30,939 270,601 10%
332 PARKS CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION FUND 127,000 21,576 - 127,000 0%
421 WATER UTILITY FUND 18,670,058 11,515,298 6,458,494 12,211,564 35%
422 STORM UTILITY FUND 11,201,524 6,738,658 5,172,271 6,029,253 46%
423 SEWER/WWTP UTILITY FUND 20,052,059 10,523,721 11,797,657 8,254,402 59%
424 BOND RESERVE FUND 1,148,390 249,684 236,684 911,706 21%
511 EQUIPMENT RENTAL FUND 1,981,981 1,399,382 1,366,454 615,527 69%
512 TECHNOLOGY RENTAL FUND 2,782,528 1,456,016 1,500,727 1,281,801 54%
126,549,692$ 74,208,797$ 63,935,932 62,613,760$ 51%
CITY OF EDMONDS
EXPENDITURES BY FUND - SUMMARY
Item 7.3
Packet pg. 109/524
Item 7.3
Packet pg. 109/524
15
ALL EXPENDITURE SUMMARY
Fund
No.Title
2025-2026
Adopted Expenditure
Budget
2025-2026
Actual Expenditures
Period 1-20
Amount
Remaining % Spent
001 GENERAL FUND 109,752,322$ 86,810,640$ 22,941,682$ 79%
009 LEOFF-MEDICAL INS. RESERVE 756,000 611,444 144,556 81%
011 RISK MANAGEMENT RESERVE FUND - - - 0%
014 HISTORIC PRESERVATION GIFT FUND 11,400 - 11,400 0%
016 BUILDING MAINTENANCE FUND 2,714,068 939,137 1,774,931 35%
017 MARSH RESTORATION & PRESERVATION FUND 183,960 7,258 176,702 4%
018 EDMONDS HOMELESSNESS RESPONSE FUND 196,425 109,610 86,815 56%
019 EDMONDS OPIOID RESPONSE FUND 450,000 - 450,000 0%
104 DRUG ENFORCEMENT FUND 40,000 14,765 25,235 37%
111 STREET FUND 5,374,146 3,510,773 1,863,373 65%
112 COMBINED STREET CONST/IMPROVE 11,206,049 2,824,305 8,381,744 25%
117 MUNICIPAL ARTS ACQUIS. FUND 768,927 379,799 389,128 49%
120 HOTEL/MOTEL TAX REVENUE FUND 305,000 252,262 52,738 83%
121 EMPLOYEE PARKING PERMIT FUND 65,173 24,314 40,859 37%
122 YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP FUND 6,000 300 5,700 5%
123 TOURISM PROMOTIONAL FUND/ARTS 84,800 52,299 32,501 62%
125 REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 2 3,330,424 1,314,887 2,015,537 39%
126 REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 1 4,146,945 2,355,768 1,791,177 57%
127 GIFTS CATALOG FUND 1,298,953 700,863 598,090 54%
130 CEMETERY MAINTENANCE/IMPROVEMT 671,945 568,380 103,565 85%
137 CEMETERY MAINTENANCE TRUST FUND 461,124 276,432 184,692 60%
138 SISTER CITY COMMISSION 14,800 - 14,800 0%
140 BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 173,320 129,465 43,855 75%
142 EDMONDS RESCUE PLAN FUND - - - 0%
143 TREE FUND 150,000 112,726 37,274 75%
231 2012 LT GO DEBT SERVICE FUND 607,760 337,141 270,619 55%
332 PARKS CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION FUND 237,035 67,814 169,221 29%
421 WATER UTILITY FUND 41,240,704 23,857,897 17,382,807 58%
422 STORM UTILITY FUND 23,800,916 14,791,258 9,009,658 62%
423 SEWER/WWTP UTILITY FUND 40,183,800 28,887,716 11,296,084 72%
424 BOND RESERVE FUND 2,297,790 1,386,053 911,737 60%
511 EQUIPMENT RENTAL FUND 4,121,587 3,351,526 770,061 81%
512 TECHNOLOGY RENTAL FUND 5,010,600 3,433,260 1,577,340$ 69%
259,661,973$ 177,108,094$ 82,553,879$ 68%
CITY OF EDMONDS
EXPENDITURES BY FUND - BIENNIAL SUMMARY
Item 7.3
Packet pg. 110/524
Item 7.3
Packet pg. 110/524
16
SALARIES AND BENEFITS SUMMARY
Below is a comparison of the total staff labor related costs (salaries and benefits) for 2019 through 2026.
$19,830,018 $20,252,292 $20,463,786 $21,292,843
$27,042,793 $29,001,979 $26,760,900 $26,983,199
-
4,000,000.00
8,000,000.00
12,000,000.00
16,000,000.00
20,000,000.00
24,000,000.00
28,000,000.00
32,000,000.00
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Salaries & Benefits (January through August)
Department
2026 Approved
"Regular" positions
2026 Modification
Reductions
2026 Total
(with modification)
2026 Active
(as of 8/28/26)
2026 Vacant but
funded
(as of 8/28/26)
City Council 8.00 8.00 8.00 -
Mayor 6.00 6.00 6.00 -
City Administrator 2.00 2.00 2.00 -
Human Resources 4.00 4.00 4.00 -
Court 11.67 11.67 11.00 0.67
Finance 9.00 9.00 9.00 -
Information Services 6.00 6.00 5.00 1.00
Police 61.75 (2.00) 59.75 55.75 4.00
Planning & Development 21.00 21.00 20.00 1.00
Parks, Recreation and Human Services 30.32 (2.00) 28.32 27.32 1.00
Public Works Admin/Facilities 16.06 16.06 13.06 3.00
Engineering 18.50 18.50 18.50 -
Streets/Storm 18.00 18.00 15.00 3.00
Water/Sewer/Treatment Plant 39.00 39.00 31.00 8.00
Equipment Rental 4.00 4.00 4.00 -
Total City Employee Count 255.30 (4.00) 251.30 229.63 21.67
The above chart only reflects approved and funded "regular" positions.
Unfunded "Regular"Unfunded "Irregular" Positions
Mayor 1.00
Human Resources 0.63 -
Court 1.00 -
Finance 2.00 -
Information Services 1.00 0.25
Police 26.00 -
Community Services & Economic Development 1.75 -
Planning & Development 1.00 -
Parks, Recreation and Human Services 10.94 2.87
Public Works Admin/Facilities 1.00 -
Engineering - 1.00
46.32 4.12
Item 7.3
Packet pg. 111/524
Item 7.3
Packet pg. 111/524
17
Page 1 of 3
Title
2026 Amended
Budget
8/31/2025
Expenditures
8/31/2026
Expenditures
Amount
Remaining % Spent
CITY COUNCIL
SALARIES AND WAGES 265,506$ 154,737$ 164,387 101,119$ 62%
OVERTIME - - 813 (813) 0%
BENEFITS 135,028 106,709 102,629 32,399 76%
400,534$ 261,446$ 267,829 132,705$ 67%
OFFICE OF MAYOR
SALARIES AND WAGES 298,357$ 208,493$ 190,128 108,229$ 64%
OVERTIME - - - - 0%
BENEFITS 77,027 51,311 59,366 17,661 77%
375,384$ 259,805$ 249,495 125,889$ 66%
HUMAN RESOURCES
SALARIES AND WAGES 626,019$ 398,221$ 419,555 206,464$ 67%
OVERTIME - - - - 0%
BENEFITS 221,541 134,714 139,976 81,565 63%
847,560$ 532,935$ 559,530 288,030$ 66%
CITY ADMINISTRATOR
SALARIES AND WAGES 368,025$ 351,011 17,014$ 95%
OVERTIME - 140 (140) 0%
BENEFITS 97,691 73,437 24,254 75%
465,716$ -$ 424,588 41,128$ 91%
CITY CLERK
SALARIES AND WAGES 447,110$ 264,461 182,650$ 59%
OVERTIME - 27 (27) 0%
BENEFITS 166,643 88,819 77,824 53%
613,753$ -$ 353,307 260,446$ 58%
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
SALARIES AND WAGES 1,040,244$ 990,709$ 683,536 356,708$ 66%
OVERTIME 8,000 5,419 21,746 (13,746) 272%
BENEFITS 375,613 305,612 195,644 179,969 52%
1,423,857$ 1,301,740$ 900,926 522,931$ 63%
NON-DEPARTMENTAL
SALARIES AND WAGES 249,063$ -$ - 249,063$ 0%
OVERTIME - - - - 0%
BENEFITS 48,607 85,045 56,638 (8,031) 117%
297,670$ 85,045$ 56,638 241,032$ 19%
POLICE SERVICES
SALARIES AND WAGES 9,501,260$ 6,289,206$ 5,877,164 3,624,096$ 62%
OVERTIME 764,747 353,165 570,976 193,771 75%
HOLIDAY BUYBACK 287,420 2,697 4,566 282,854 2%
BENEFITS 3,320,055 2,281,886 2,327,534 992,521 70%
13,873,482$ 8,926,953$ 8,780,239 5,093,243$ 63%
MUNICIPAL COURT
SALARIES AND WAGES 1,455,523$ 690,701$ 895,747 559,776$ 62%
OVERTIME 10,000 10,885 12,342 (2,342) 123%
BENEFITS 418,948 216,271 276,630 142,318 66%
1,884,471$ 917,858$ 1,184,719 699,752$ 63%
COMMUNITY SERVICES/ECON DEV.
SALARIES AND WAGES -$ 381,713$ - -$ 0%
OVERTIME - 6,093 - - 0%
BENEFITS - 124,821 - - 0%
-$ 512,628$ - -$ 0%
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
SALARIES AND WAGES 2,421,740$ 1,241,332$ 1,468,813 952,927$ 61%
OVERTIME - - - - 0%
BENEFITS 919,886 463,238 559,893 359,993 61%
3,341,626$ 1,704,570$ 2,028,706 1,312,920$ 61%
HUMAN SERVICES PROGRAM
SALARIES AND WAGES $ - $ 80,916 - $ - 0%
OVERTIME - - - - 0%
BENEFITS - 21,926 - - 0%
$ - $ 102,842 - $ - 0%
CITY OF EDMONDS
GENERAL FUND - SALARIES AND BENEFITS - BY DEPARTMENT IN DETAIL
Item 7.3
Packet pg. 112/524
Item 7.3
Packet pg. 112/524
18
Page 2 of 3
PARKS & RECREATION
SALARIES AND WAGES 2,435,050$ 1,615,114$ 1,542,695 892,355$ 63%
OVERTIME 10,000 2,135 11,386 (1,386) 114%
BENEFITS 987,310 605,347 567,782 419,528 58%
3,432,360$ 2,222,596$ 2,121,862 1,310,498$ 62%
PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION
SALARIES AND WAGES 489,335$ 232,499$ 340,457 148,878$ 70%
OVERTIME - - - - 0%
BENEFITS 194,326 90,621 109,470 84,857 56%
683,661$ 323,120$ 449,926 233,735$ 66%
FACILITIES MAINTENANCE
SALARIES AND WAGES 1,038,037$ 732,618$ 698,614 339,423$ 67%
OVERTIME 9,000 4,379 3,454 5,546 38%
BENEFITS 453,470 280,624 254,447 199,023 56%
1,500,507$ 1,017,621$ 956,514 543,993$ 64%
ENGINEERING
SALARIES AND WAGES 2,665,936$ 1,401,690$ 1,412,100 1,253,836$ 53%
OVERTIME 5,857 2,845 - 5,857 0%
BENEFITS 957,890 485,314 464,424 493,466 48%
3,629,683$ 1,889,849$ 1,876,523 1,753,160$ 52%
TOTAL GENERAL FUND SALARIES AND BENEFITS 32,770,264$ 20,059,007$ 20,210,803 12,559,461$ 62%
LEOFF-MEDICAL INS. RESERVE (009)
BENEFITS 167,000$ 97,813$ 112,139 54,861$ 67%
167,000$ 97,813$ 112,139 54,861$ 67%
STREET FUND (111)
SALARIES AND WAGES 1,026,728$ 440,204$ 458,778 567,950$ 45%
OVERTIME 41,700 19,383 22,590 19,110 54%
BENEFITS 449,049 183,546 172,426 276,623 38%
1,517,477$ 643,133$ 653,794 863,683$ 43%
MUNICIPAL ARTS ACQUIS. FUND (117)
SALARIES AND WAGES 97,365$ 40,000$ 65,399 31,966$ 67%
BENEFITS 44,247 - 18,691 25,556 42%
141,612$ 40,000$ 84,089 57,523$ 59%
EMPLOYEE PARKING PERMIT FUND (121)
SALARIES AND WAGES 23,718$ -$ - 23,718$ 0%
OVERTIME - - - - 0%
BENEFITS 7,585 - - 7,585 0%
31,303$ -$ - 31,303$ 0%
REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 1 (125)
SALARIES AND WAGES 133,843$ 59,954$ 70,494 63,349$ 53%
OVERTIME - - - - 0%
BENEFITS 56,831 19,892 25,023 31,808 44%
190,674$ 79,846$ 95,517 95,157$ 50%
GIFTS CATALOG FUND (127)
SALARIES AND WAGES 288,125$ 182,087$ 162,324 125,801$ 56%
OVERTIME - - 382 (382) 0%
BENEFITS 146,862 71,639 59,566 87,296 41%
434,987$ 253,726$ 222,273 212,714$ 51%
CITY OF EDMONDS
NON GENERAL FUND - SALARIES AND BENEFITS - BY DEPARTMENT IN DETAIL
CITY OF EDMONDS
GENERAL FUND - SALARIES AND BENEFITS - BY DEPARTMENT IN DETAIL
Item 7.3
Packet pg. 113/524
Item 7.3
Packet pg. 113/524
19
Page 3 of 3
CEMETERY MAINTENANCE/IMPROVEMENT (130)
SALARIES AND WAGES 198,453$ 103,593$ 167,904 30,549$ 85%
OVERTIME 3,500 796 - 3,500 0%
BENEFITS 75,188 42,654 80,029 (4,841) 106%
277,141$ 147,043$ 247,933 29,208$ 89%
CEMETERY MAINTENANCE TRUST FUND (137)
SALARIES AND WAGES 6,630$ -$ 3,125 3,505$ 47%
BENEFITS 3,370 - 1,134 2,236 34%
10,000$ -$ 4,258 5,742$ 43%
WATER FUND (421)
SALARIES AND WAGES 1,278,765$ 682,687$ 628,451 650,314$ 49%
OVERTIME 27,500 26,575 27,273 227 99%
BENEFITS 546,838 312,084 284,575 262,263 52%
1,853,103$ 1,021,347$ 940,299 912,804$ 51%
STORM FUND (422)
SALARIES AND WAGES 1,078,536$ 616,434$ 676,529 402,007$ 63%
OVERTIME 28,552 19,913 12,782 15,770 45%
BENEFITS 450,180 283,863 308,975 141,205 69%
1,557,268$ 920,211$ 998,286 558,982$ 64%
SEWER FUND (423)
SALARIES AND WAGES 891,334$ 1,745,082$ 494,135 397,199$ 55%
OVERTIME 32,438 182,109 24,270 8,168 75%
BENEFITS 353,292 661,520 179,010 174,282 51%
1,277,064$ 2,588,711$ 697,415 579,649$ 55%
SEWER FUND (423) - WWTP
SALARIES AND WAGES 2,383,116$ 1,141,990 1,241,126$ 48%
OVERTIME 125,000 212,535 (87,534.52) 170%
BENEFITS 907,763 455,078 452,684.68 50%
3,415,879$ -$ 1,809,602 1,606,277$ 53%
EQUIPMENT RENTAL FUND (511)
SALARIES AND WAGES 472,509$ 301,410$ 318,145 154,364$ 67%
OVERTIME 5,000 75 693 4,307 14%
BENEFITS 166,475 100,790 108,601 57,874 65%
643,984$ 402,275$ 427,439 216,545$ 66%
TECHNOLOGY RENTAL FUND (512)
SALARIES AND WAGES 674,757$ 375,589$ 360,800 313,957$ 53%
OVERTIME - 440 - - 0%
BENEFITS 251,096 131,760 118,552 132,544 47%
925,853$ 507,789$ 479,352 446,501$ 52%
TOTAL SALARIES AND BENEFITS - ALL FUNDS 45,213,609 26,760,900 26,983,199 18,230,410 60%
CITY OF EDMONDS
NON GENERAL FUND - SALARIES AND BENEFITS - BY DEPARTMENT IN DETAIL
Item 7.3
Packet pg. 114/524
Item 7.3
Packet pg. 114/524
20
DEBT SUMMARY
*This 1st table only reflects the total outstanding principal payments (does not include interest).
2024 Outstanding Fund 001 Fund 111 Fund 112 Fund 126 Fund 421 Fund 422 Fund 423 PFD
2012 LTGO 505,000 505,000
2019 LTGO 2,715,000 2,715,000
2021 LTGO (A)9,015,000 3,410,000 1,270,000 2,640,571 1,260,961 433,468
2021 LTGO (B)2,230,000 2,230,000
2015 Revenue Bond 12,920,000 3,911,810 2,583,269 6,424,921
2020 Revenue Bond 13,875,000 13,875,000
2024 Revenue Bond 19,600,000 11,470,000 2,695,000 5,435,000
PWTFL 06-692-012 32,882 32,882
DOE L1400002 294,776 294,776
Sno Co Loan #03-2016 383,862 383,862
2016 (2007 Refinance) Chase Bank 343,056 59,485 4,597 26,758 3,088 112,729 136,399
64,653,920 3,677,827 9,105 65,763 4,868,002 18,878,331 7,551,663 27,258,229 2,345,000
Total Debt Outstanding 64,653,920
*This 2nd table reflects both the principal and interest portions of the debt payments.
2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2035 2040 2045
2012 LTGO 131,063 83,663 81,975 80,288 83,600 81,800 - -
2019 LTGO 236,475 233,725 235,725 232,225 233,475 1,169,656 935,875 -
2021 LTGO (A)1,212,750 1,215,250 1,215,500 1,213,500 1,209,250 2,662,050 1,801,000 357,000
2021 LTGO (B)170,115 167,715 170,315 167,815 170,315 841,188 845,055 169,290
2015 Revenue Bond 1,148,369 1,148,119 1,147,269 1,149,925 1,145,875 5,741,250 5,739,200 -
2020 Revenue Bond 304,044 304,044 304,044 304,044 304,044 1,520,219 3,634,019 12,541,456
2024 Revenue Bond 1,395,000 1,389,250 1,392,750 1,390,000 1,391,250 10,885,500 8,815,000 3,406,500
PWTFL 05-691-015 - - - - - - - -
PWTFL 06-692-012 33,046 - - - - - - -
DOE L1400002 40,570 40,570 40,570 40,570 40,570 121,710 - -
Sno Co Loan #03-2016 35,286 34,843 34,400 33,957 33,514 160,927 91,241
2016 (2007 Refinance) Chase Bank 348,785 - - - - - - -
Total Principal and Interest Debt Outstanding 85,039,379$
Annual Principal and Interest Debt Payments
Item 7.3
Packet pg. 115/524
Item 7.3
Packet pg. 115/524
21
INTERFUND LOAN SUMMARY
Below are details of the Interfund Loans from Funds 421 and 422 to the General Fund in 2025.
Month Beginning Balance Loan Repayment Total Balance Interest Rate (%) Monthly Interest
2026-01 3,500,000 (145,833) 3,354,167 4.45%12,440
2026-02 3,354,167 (145,833) 3,208,334 4.45%11,899
2026-03 3,208,334 (145,833) 3,062,501 4.45%11,358
2026-04 3,062,501 (145,833) 2,916,668 4.45%10,817
2026-05 2,916,668 (145,833) 2,770,835 4.45%10,277
2026-06 2,770,835 (145,833) 2,625,002 4.45%9,736
2026-07 2,625,002 (145,833) 2,479,169 4.45%9,195
2026-08 2,479,169 (145,833) 2,333,336 4.45%8,654
2026-09 2,333,336 2,333,336 4.45%
2026-10 2,333,336 2,333,336 4.45%
2026-11 2,333,336 2,333,336 4.45%
2026-12 2,333,336 2,333,336 4.45%
(1,166,664) 84,376
*The "Monthly Interest" is the interest charged on the outstanding balance in each month of 2026.
Fund 421 - Principal Repayment Schedule
Month Beginning Balance Loan Repayment Total Balance Interest Rate (%) Monthly Interest
2026-01 2,500,000 (104,167) 2,395,833 4.45%8,881
2026-02 2,395,833 (104,167) 2,291,666 4.45%8,495
2026-03 2,291,666 (104,167) 2,187,499 4.45%8,109
2026-04 2,187,499 (104,167) 2,083,332 4.45%7,723
2026-05 2,083,332 (104,167) 1,979,165 4.45%7,337
2026-06 1,979,165 (104,167) 1,874,998 4.45%6,951
2026-07 1,874,998 (104,167) 1,770,831 4.45%6,564
2026-08 1,770,831 (104,167) 1,666,664 4.45%6,178
2026-09 1,666,664 1,666,664 4.45%
2026-10 1,666,664 1,666,664 4.45%
2026-11 1,666,664 1,666,664 4.45%
2026-12 1,666,664 1,666,664 4.45%
(833,336) 60,238
*The "Monthly Interest" is the interest charged on the outstanding balance in each month of 2026.
Fund 422 - Principal Repayment Schedule
Month Beginning Balance 25 Int. payment Total Balance
2026-01 155,771 (12,981) 142,790
2026-02 142,790 (12,981) 129,809
2026-03 129,809 (12,981) 116,828
2026-04 116,828 (12,981) 103,847
2026-05 103,847 (12,981) 90,866
2026-06 90,866 (12,981) 77,885
2026-07 77,885 (12,981) 64,904
2026-08 64,904 (12,981) 51,923
2026-09 51,923 51,923
2026-10 51,923 51,923
2026-11 51,923 51,923
2026-12 51,923 51,923
(103,848)
*The $155,771 is the total interest owed to Fund 421 for 2025.
Fund 421 - 2025 Interest payment
Month Beginning Balance 25 Int. payment Total Balance
2026-01 110,297 (9,191) 101,106
2026-02 101,106 (9,191) 91,915
2026-03 91,915 (9,191) 82,724
2026-04 82,724 (9,191) 73,533
2026-05 73,533 (9,191) 64,342
2026-06 64,342 (9,191) 55,151
2026-07 55,151 (9,191) 45,960
2026-08 45,960 (9,191) 36,769
2026-09 36,769 36,769
2026-10 36,769 36,769
2026-11 36,769 36,769
2026-12 36,769 36,769
(73,528)
*The $110,297 is the total interest owed to Fund 422 for 2025.
Fund 422 - 2025 Interest payment
Item 7.3
Packet pg. 116/524
Item 7.3
Packet pg. 116/524
22
INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO SUMMARY
Years
Agency/Investment Purchase to Par Market Maturity Coupon
Issuer Type Price Maturity Value Value Date Rate
Farmer Mac Bonds 2,057,309 0.21 2,305,000 2,291,312 11/17/26 1.150%
Global Federal Credit Union
(Waterfront Center)CD 245,000 0.32 245,000 245,000 12/27/26 2.469%
US Treasury Note Note 1,003,690 0.50 1,000,000 1,000,625 02/28/27 4.125%
Global Federal Credit Union
(ECA )CD 2,803,516 1.21 2,803,516 2,803,516 11/15/27 2.956%
FAMC Bonds 1,060,671 1.41 1,061,000 1,051,345 01/26/28 3.625%
FAMC Bonds 930,600 2.17 1,000,000 927,391 10/30/28 0.850%
FHLB Bonds 994,400 3.07 1,000,000 973,193 09/24/29 3.500%
Resolution Funding Corporation Bonds 999,192 3.62 1,220,000 1,036,438 04/15/30 4.482%
FFCB Bonds 1,002,270 4.55 1,000,000 982,349 03/17/31 4.125%
FFCB Bonds 991,753 4.91 1,165,000 1,003,084 07/28/31 1.310%
TOTAL SECURITIES 12,088,402 2.20 12,799,516 12,314,253
Washington State Local Gov't Investment Pool 71,652,771 71,652,771 Demand 3.74%
84,452,288$ 83,967,024$
US Bank Account 11,324,596
95,776,883$
As of August 31, 2026
City of Edmonds Investment Portfolio Detail
TOTAL PORTFOLIO
Farmer
Mac, 18%
Global
Federal
Credit
Union -CD,
24%
FFCB, 17%
FAMC, 16%
FHLB, 8%
US
Treasury
Note, 8%
Issuer Diversification Checking,
$11.32 ,
12%
State LGIP,
$71.65 ,
75%
CD's,
$3.05 ,
3%
Note,
$1.00 ,
1%
Bonds,
$8.75 ,
9%
Cash and Investment Balances
(in $ Millions)
Item 7.3
Packet pg. 117/524
Item 7.3
Packet pg. 117/524
23
INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO SUMMARY
$947,931 $950,684 $1,091,709
$1,683,872
$3,044,847 $2,914,584
$1,878,751
$-
$500,000
$1,000,000
$1,500,000
$2,000,000
$2,500,000
$3,000,000
$3,500,000
2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 YTD 2026
Annual Interest Income
743,065 748,741 657,391
1,029,893
1,907,904 1,961,553 1,878,751
-
200,000
400,000
600,000
800,000
1,000,000
1,200,000
1,400,000
1,600,000
1,800,000
2,000,000
2,200,000
2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 YTD 2026
Interest Income (January through August)
Item 7.3
Packet pg. 118/524
Item 7.3
Packet pg. 118/524
*The actual/estimate line combines actuals through the reporting month and budget allocations based on the prior year
trend.
*The budget line allocates the 2026 budget to each month based on the prior year trend.
(2,500,634)
(2,879,595)
(3,262,653)
17,558 390,219
(439,760)
(970,480)
(1,556,559)
(1,887,484)
1,704,015
1,358,546
(85,408)
(233,041)
(2,518,565)
(2,872,097)
(1,686,418)
2,625,381
3,404,644 3,032,981
2,480,424
2,424,047
1,985,385
5,401,470 5,037,945
3,373,113
(4,000,000)
(3,000,000)
(2,000,000)
(1,000,000)
-
1,000,000
2,000,000
3,000,000
4,000,000
5,000,000
6,000,000
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Budgeted vs Actual/Estimate Cash Balance
Budget Actual/Estimate
24
Item 7.3
Packet pg. 119/524
Item 7.3
Packet pg. 119/524
City of Edmonds
2026 General Fund (001) Cash Flow Report (with ACTUALS)
Beginning Cash Balance (233,040.82) Difference
Revenues Jan Actual Feb Actual Mar Actual Apr Actual May Actual Jun Actual Jul Actual Aug Actual Sep Forecast Oct Forecast Nov Forecast Dec Forecast Total Budget inc / (dec)
2,714,712 3,599,318 5,086,550 8,246,184 4,158,304 3,844,590 3,366,110 3,579,175 3,538,933 7,609,676 3,835,967 3,029,594 52,609,112 51,450,940 1,158,172
- - - - - - - - (100,000.00) (167,676.00) -(179,610.00) -
Expenditures Jan Actual Feb Actual Mar Actual Apr Actual May Actual Jun Actual Jul Actual Aug Actual Sep Forecast Oct Forecast Nov Forecast Dec Forecast Total Budget Balance4,678,204 4,100,965 3,750,362 3,887,023 3,887,944 4,133,349 4,028,401 3,673,034 3,977,595 4,193,591 4,199,492 4,694,426 49,204,387 51,490,307 (2,285,920) - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Net Revenue/(Expenditures)(1,963,492) (501,647) 1,336,188 4,359,161 270,360 (288,759) (662,292) (93,859) (438,662) 3,416,085 (363,525) (1,664,832) 3,404,725 (39,367) 3,444,092
Changes in AR (45,984) (36,262) (63,210) 182,044 (38,980) 9,647 144,115 223 Changes in AP 185,327 184,377 (87,299) (229,407) 86,508 (92,551) (34,380) 37,258
Changes in Cash/Petty Cash
Cash Balance (2,057,190) (2,410,722) (1,225,043) 3,086,756 3,404,644 3,032,981 2,480,424 2,424,047 1,985,385 5,401,470 5,037,945 3,373,113
2D
Item 7.3
Packet pg. 120/524
Item 7.3
Packet pg. 120/524
Munis #Division
Work
Performe
d for Project Name
Project
Budget
Budget
Amendmen
t Total Budget
Eden Expense
report 2007-
2025
CY Expenses -
through 09/30/2026
(No 9/2026 Payroll)
Total Expenses
to 09/30/2026
Remaining
Budget
Remaining
Budget (%) Grant/Loan
PY
Reimbursemen
t
Reimbursemen
t as of
9/30/2026
Reimbursement
to Date ($)
Reimbursement
to Date (%)
Grant/Loan
Remaining
CE21SM02 EngineeringStorm Edmonds Marsh Water Quality Improvements Phase 1 418,000 418,000 139,609 48,421 188,030 229,970 55%313,500 82,294 - 82,294 26%231,206
CE24SM02 EngineeringStorm Perrinville Creek Basin Analysis Update (aka Perrinville Flow Reduction StudyUpdate)649,200 649,200 153,297 224,254 377,551 271,649 42%510,600 123,063 19,070 142,133 28%368,467
CE24SM03 EngineeringStorm Edmonds Marsh Water Quality Improvements Phase 2 458,000 458,000 78,981 47,534 126,515 331,485 72%100,000 57,135 42,865 100,000 100%-
SE24SM01 EngineeringStorm Edmonds Marsh Estuary Planning Study 204,000 204,000 192,150 463 192,613 11,387 6%135,000 135,000 - 135,000 100%-
IE25ST07 EngineeringStreets Annual Street Pres Program (7th Ave N Pedestrian Improvements)- 484,180 484,180 56,012 67,440 123,452 360,728 75%379,600 28,490 18,221 46,711 12%332,889
CE25ST01 EngineeringStreets Annual Street Pres Program (Citywide Lighting Improvements)- 700,000 700,000 30,135 62,838 92,973 607,027 87%700,000 17,572 21,446 39,017 6%660,983
IE18ST01 EngineeringStreets 76th Ave W @220th Intersection Improvements 11,000,000 11,000,000 868,280 83,732 952,012 10,047,988 91%3,500,000 570,876 36,484 607,360 17%2,892,640
IE20ST03 EngineeringStreets Highway 99 Revitalization & Gateway Project - Stage 2 9,400,000 20,000 9,420,000 9,213,935 1,988 9,215,923 204,077 2%10,090,000 9,175,782 13,548 9,189,330 91%900,670
IE21ST02 EngineeringStreets Hwy 99 Revitalization Project - Stage 3 28,457,000 28,457,000 1,815,514 400,195 2,215,708 26,241,292 92%22,661,000 1,575,432 165,280 1,740,713 8%20,920,287
IE21ST02 EngineeringStreets Hwy 99 Revitalization Project - Stage 3 - - 0%729,147 191,280 39,092 230,373 32%498,774
IE21ST03 EngineeringStreets Hwy 99 Revitalization Project - Stage 4 37,000,000 37,000,000 1,233,115 126,500 1,359,615 35,640,385 96%10,886,000 1,183,004 27,222 1,210,226 11%9,675,774
IE21ST04 EngineeringStreets SR -104 Adaptive System 4,000,000 4,000,000 259,137 11,911 271,049 3,728,951 93%354,650 218,054 5,111 223,165 63%131,485
IE23ST01 EngineeringStreets Main St Overlay 6th - 8th - WSDOT 1,855,000 885,690 2,740,690 1,976,087 17,619 1,993,707 746,983 27%800,765 772,442 576 773,018 97%27,747
IE23ST01 EngineeringStreets Main St Overlay 6th - 8th - TIB - - - 0%449,897 449,897 - 449,897 100%-
SE24ST01 EngineeringStreets Safety Action Plan 375,000 375,000 154,211 141,112 295,324 79,676 21%300,000 72,230 138,974 211,204 70%88,796
SE26SM01 EngineeringStorm Edmonds Marsh Preliminary Design 3,593 3,593 (3,593) 0%
CE24SW01 EngineeringSewer Phase 12 Sewer Replacement (2025)2,700,000 2,700,000 516,792 813,257 1,330,049 1,369,951 51%
CE25SW01 EngineeringSewer Phase 13 Sewer Replacement (2026)2,503,000 2,503,000 156,346 325,240 481,587 2,021,413 81%
CE26SW01 EngineeringSewer Phase 14 Sewer Replacement (2027)2,603,000 2,603,000 173,393 173,393 2,429,607 93%
SE26SW01 EngineeringSewer Sewer Comprehensive Plan 500,000 500,000 53,381 53,381 446,619 89%
SE25SM01 EngineeringStorm 2025 PFAS Study for Deer Creek CARA - 60,000 60,000 6,774 3,389 10,163 49,837 83%
CE22SM01 EngineeringStorm Lower Perrinville Creek Restoration Project 4,500,000 4,500,000 317,136 106,183 423,318 4,076,682 91%
CE20SM02 EngineeringStorm Perrinville Creek Flow Management Projects 100,000 100,000 88,695 9,500 98,194 1,806 2%
CE21SM04 EngineeringStorm Phase 4 Storm Maintenance 1,912,400 1,912,400 1,081,902 1,081,902 830,499 43%
CE24SM01 EngineeringStorm Phase 5 Storm Maintenance 2,011,000 2,011,000 205,657 304,743 510,400 1,500,600 75%
CE25SM01 EngineeringStorm Phase 6 Storm Maintenance 1,318,000 1,318,000 306,975 124,307 431,283 886,717 67%
CE26SM02 EngineeringStorm Phase 7 Storm Maintenance - - - 17,249 17,249 (17,249) #DIV/0!
SE16SM01 EngineeringStorm Storm and Surface Water Comprehensive Plan Update 733,000 733,000 509,249 95,222 604,471 128,529 18%
CE26SM01 EngineeringStorm 20719 86th Pl W Structure Removal 200,000 200,000 72,194 72,194 127,806 64%
IE25ST04 EngineeringStreets Pedestrian Safety Program 20,180 20,180 25,957 15,242 15,242 4,938 24%
IE25ST03 EngineeringStreets Traffic Calming Program 62,650 62,650 67,314 18,019 18,019 44,631 71%
IE26ST01 EngineeringStreets 2026 Overlay Program 773,250 (91,712) 681,538 40,542 29,863 70,405 611,133 90%
CE23ST01 EngineeringStreets 84th Ave W Walkway from 238th St SW to 234th St SW 3,325,000 15,000 3,340,000 84,264 12,394 96,659 3,243,341 97%
IE24ST02 EngineeringStreets 88th Ave Overlay and Sidewalk Repair 1,180,000 1,180,000 505,846 517,812 1,023,658 156,342 13%
IE25ST01 EngineeringStreets Annual Street Pres Program (2025 Overlay Program)1,448,800 200,000 1,648,800 1,136,987 156,768 1,293,755 355,045 22%
IE25ST02 EngineeringStreets Annual Street Pres Program (2025 Ramps Program)353,000 353,000 34,599 287,740 322,338 30,662 9%
SE20ST01 EngineeringStreets Official Street Map & Sidewalk Plan - - 909 909 (909) #DIV/0!
IE25ST06 EngineeringStreets Olympic View Drive Overlay - 196th/SR-524 to Talbot Rd 1,500,000 1,500,000 28,742 109,584 138,326 1,361,674 91%
CE24UT01 EngineeringStreets PW Parking Lot Apron Repair 1,236,000 1,236,000 41,418 2,139 43,557 1,192,443 96%
IE25ST05 EngineeringStreets Traffic Signal Upgrade 30,280 30,280 3,101 3,546 3,546 26,734 88%
SE23ST01 EngineeringStreets Transportation Plan Update 406,000 5,886 411,886 418,036 1,607 419,644 (7,758) -2%
CE26ST01 EngineeringStreets Pedestrian Improvements 2027 (Eden: Citywide Curb Enhancements)- 33,225 33,225 (33,225) #DIV/0!
CE24SM04 EngineeringUtilities PW UST Replacement 135,000 135,000 13,687 13,687 121,313 90%
CE23WT01 EngineeringWater Phase 14 Annual Replacement Program - Waterline 2,603,000 2,603,000 2,449,703 2,449,703 153,297 6%
CE24WT01 EngineeringWater Phase 15 Annual Replacement Program - Waterline 4,091,000 4,091,000 4,049,449 7,295 4,056,744 34,256 1%
CE25WT01 EngineeringWater Phase 16 Annual Replacement Program - Waterline 3,836,000 3,836,000 365,840 128,069 493,908 3,342,092 87%
ME21WT02 EngineeringWater Yost & Seaview Reservoir Repairs & Upgrades 9,659,000 9,659,000 528,985 267,651 796,636 8,862,364 92%
CFC25001 Facilities Facilities CH Stairway 50,000 50,000 21,332 142,952 164,285 (114,285) -229%
CFC25004 Facilities Facilities Electrical Panel Replacement 25,000 25,000 8,663 - 8,663 16,337 65%
CFC26001 Facilities Facilities Sewer Replacement-Anderson Center 140,000 140,000 - 144,307 144,307 (4,307) -3%
CFC26003 Facilities Facilities Electrical Meter Rplcmnt-BracketsLN 6,000 6,000 - 5,296 5,296 704 12%
CFC26007 Facilities Facilities Roof Replacement - City Hall 180,966 180,966 8,132 8,132 172,834 96%
CFC26008 Facilities Facilities Stairway and Railing Safety Update - City Hall 151,679 151,679 - - 151,679 100%
CFC26011 Facilities Facilities PS-Public Facing Counter&Office ADA 177,569 177,569 7,980 7,980 169,589 96%
CFC26012 Facilities Facilities Roof - Fish Hatchery 35,500 35,500 - 63,196 63,196 (27,696) -78%
CFC26013 Facilities Facilities Insulation Replacement-PW Fleet 56,961 56,961 76,054 76,054 (19,093) -34%
CFC26015 Facilities Facilities Sno-King Door Rplcmnt-Anderson Cntr 8,500 8,500 - 9,348 9,348 (848) -10%
CFC26019 Facilities Facilities Audio Replacement-Plaza Meeting Rm 53,125 53,125 55,868 55,868 (2,744) -5%
CFC26020 Facilities Facilities Blind Replacement-Plaza Meeting Rm 19,535 19,535 1,017 1,017 18,517 95%
CFC26021 Facilities Facilities Entry Door Replacements-Plaza Room 89,732 89,732 104,007 104,007 (14,275) -16%
CFC26022 Facilities Facilities Plumbing Replacement-PlazaMeetingRm 19,461 19,461 875 875 18,586 96%
CFC26023 Facilities Facilities Roof Replacement - Plaza Meeting Rm 150,000 150,000 - 7,810 7,810 142,190 95%
CFC26026 Facilities Facilities Electrical Panel/Service - PW Fleet Out to Bid - 1,115 1,115 (1,115) #DIV/0!
CFC26028 Facilities Facilities HVAC Equipment Replacement-PW Fleet 20,189 20,189 22,428 22,428 (2,239) -11%
CFC26031 Facilities Facilities Gutter Replacement-James Wade Thtr 15,928 15,928 21,267 21,267 (5,339) -34%
CFC26033 Facilities Facilities Shower Tile Replacement-Yost Pool 15,013 15,013 15,013 15,013 - 0%
CFC26038 Facilities Facilities Gutter Replacement - Public Safety 39,076 39,076 45,254 45,254 (6,177) -16%
CFC26046 Facilities Facilities Facilities Bond - Labor - 3,799 3,799 (3,799) #DIV/0!
CFC26048 Facilities Facilities Roof Replacement - Wade James 116,492 116,492 5,235 5,235 111,257 96%
CPW24001 Utilities Utilities Spoil pile cover - 75,000 75,000 16,672 - 16,672 58,328 78%
CTP18001 WWTP WWTP Phase 6 Energy Design SSI 27,252,645 27,252,645 28,393,488 462,014 28,855,503 (1,602,858) -6%
CTP24001 WWTP WWTP VFD Upgrades 250,000 250,000 92,716 92,716 157,284 63%
WWTP WWTP LPA Blower 303 & 305 Rehab 35,000 35,000 - 35,000 100%
WWTP WWTP Secondary Clarifier 1 Rehab 450,000 450,000 - 450,000 100%
WWTP WWTP Valve Replacement Program 250,000 250,000 - 250,000 100%
WWTP WWTP Electrical Improvement Project 250,000 250,000 - 250,000 100%
Fleet Multiple 2026 Scheduled Vehicle Replacements 505,000 505,000 - 435,028 435,028 69,972 14%
173,919,130 2,354,044 176,273,174 57,595,522 6,657,323 64,156,473 112,116,700 51,910,159 14,652,551 527,890 15,180,441 36,729,718
From Grant Billing
C:\Users\mager\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\4PEA10XU\2026 Capital Projects - 09-30-2026 (002)26
Item 7.3
Packet pg. 121/524
Item 7.3
Packet pg. 121/524
27
APPENDIX A
Item 7.3
Packet pg. 122/524
Item 7.3
Packet pg. 122/524
28
GENERAL FUND DEPARTMENT EXPENSE SUMMARY
City Council
Cumulative Monthly Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Trend Budget Trend Actuals Actuals %
January 46,305$ 46,305$ 35,798$ 35,798$ -22.69%
February 93,815 47,510 38,451 74,248 -20.86%
March 132,067 38,252 38,444 112,693 -14.67%
April 170,978 38,911 38,359 151,051 -11.65%
May 217,916 46,939 38,398 189,449 -13.06%
June 251,874 33,957 38,336 227,785 -9.56%
July 287,733 35,859 38,439 266,224 -7.48%
August 323,412 35,680 38,849 305,074 -5.67%
September 358,420 35,008 33,023 338,097 -5.67%
October 396,263 37,843 35,697 373,794 -5.67%
November 432,950 36,687 34,607 408,401 -5.67%
December 467,379 34,429 32,476 440,877 -5.67%
467,379$
Office of Mayor
Cumulative Monthly Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Trend Budget Trend Actuals Actuals %
January 37,133$ 37,133$ 34,424$ 34,424$ -7.30%
February 76,256 39,123 33,436 67,859 -11.01%
March 119,627 43,371 35,401 103,261 -13.68%
April 162,818 43,191 41,081 144,342 -11.35%
May 218,503 55,685 48,278 192,620 -11.85%
June 254,977 36,475 48,913 241,533 -5.27%
July 295,532 40,554 1,997 243,530 -17.60%
August 334,938 39,407 69,785 313,315 -6.46%
September 373,551 38,613 36,120 349,435 -6.46%
October 415,432 41,881 39,177 388,612 -6.46%
November 451,910 36,478 34,123 422,735 -6.46%
December 498,288 46,378 43,384 466,118 -6.46%
498,288$
*The monthly budget trend columns are based on a two year trend.
2026
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Summary-City Council
2026
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Summary-Office of Mayor
0
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
300,000
350,000
400,000
450,000
500,000
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
City Council
Current Year Budget Prior Year
0
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
300,000
350,000
400,000
450,000
500,000
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Office of Mayor
Current Year Budget Prior Year
Item 7.3
Packet pg. 123/524
Item 7.3
Packet pg. 123/524
29
GENERAL FUND DEPARTMENT EXPENSE SUMMARY
Human Resources
Cumulative Monthly Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Trend Budget Trend Actuals Actuals %
January 117,220$ 117,220$ 71,575$ 71,575$ -38.94%
February 210,140 92,920 76,930 148,505 -29.33%
March 298,920 88,780 85,398 233,904 -21.75%
April 385,637 86,717 107,265 341,169 -11.53%
May 470,617 84,980 79,525 420,694 -10.61%
June 558,695 88,078 77,186 497,881 -10.89%
July 659,905 101,211 76,273 574,154 -12.99%
August 743,642 83,736 77,585 651,739 -12.36%
September 829,505 85,864 75,252 726,991 -12.36%
October 918,768 89,263 78,231 805,222 -12.36%
November 1,016,040 97,272 85,251 890,473 -12.36%
December 1,107,619 91,579 80,261 970,734 -12.36%
1,107,619$
Municipal Court
Cumulative Monthly Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Trend Budget Trend Actuals Actuals %
January 189,140$ 189,140$ 189,905$ 189,905$ 0.40%
February 391,341 202,201 196,077 385,982 -1.37%
March 585,437 194,096 203,226 589,208 0.64%
April 778,526 193,089 204,280 793,488 1.92%
May 979,230 200,704 210,247 1,003,735 2.50%
June 1,183,941 204,710 200,635 1,204,370 1.73%
July 1,394,138 210,197 204,472 1,408,842 1.05%
August 1,619,767 225,629 200,581 1,609,423 -0.64%
September 1,851,260 231,493 230,015 1,839,438 -0.64%
October 2,088,939 237,679 236,161 2,075,600 -0.64%
November 2,322,545 233,606 232,114 2,307,714 -0.64%
December 2,553,298 230,753 229,279 2,536,993 -0.64%
2,553,298$
*The monthly budget trend columns are based on a two year trend.
2026
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Summary-Human Resources
2026
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Summary-Municipal Court
0
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
700,000
800,000
900,000
1,000,000
1,100,000
1,200,000
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Human Resources
Current Year Budget Prior Year
0
200,000
400,000
600,000
800,000
1,000,000
1,200,000
1,400,000
1,600,000
1,800,000
2,000,000
2,200,000
2,400,000
2,600,000
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Municipal Court
Current Year Budget Prior Year
Item 7.3
Packet pg. 124/524
Item 7.3
Packet pg. 124/524
30
GENERAL FUND DEPARTMENT EXPENSE SUMMARY
Finance
Cumulative Monthly Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Trend Budget Trend Actuals Actuals %
January 144,080$ 144,080$ 148,136$ 148,136$ 2.82%
February 274,633 130,553 156,285 304,421 10.85%
March 404,158 129,525 160,967 465,388 15.15%
April 527,543 123,385 182,555 647,942 22.82%
May 695,043 167,500 184,689 832,632 19.80%
June 808,217 113,175 162,672 995,304 23.15%
July 919,465 111,248 7,190 1,002,494 9.03%
August 1,036,395 116,930 161,505 1,163,999 12.31%
September 1,154,649 118,253 132,813 1,296,812 12.31%
October 1,294,065 139,416 156,581 1,453,393 12.31%
November 1,436,319 142,254 159,769 1,613,162 12.31%
December 1,560,772 124,453 139,776 1,752,937 12.31%
1,560,772$
*The monthly budget trend columns are based on a two year trend.
2026
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Summary-Finance
0
200,000
400,000
600,000
800,000
1,000,000
1,200,000
1,400,000
1,600,000
1,800,000
2,000,000
2,200,000
2,400,000
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Finance
Current Year Budget Prior Year
Item 7.3
Packet pg. 125/524
Item 7.3
Packet pg. 125/524
31
GENERAL FUND DEPARTMENT EXPENSE SUMMARY
City Attorney
Cumulative Monthly Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Trend Budget Trend Actuals Actuals %
January 110,529$ 110,529$ 35,256$ 35,256$ -68.10%
February 221,058 110,529 75,044 110,300 -50.10%
March 331,586 110,529 96,588 206,889 -37.61%
April 442,115 110,529 114,398 321,287 -27.33%
May 552,644 110,529 109,122 430,408 -22.12%
June 663,173 110,529 93,689 524,097 -20.97%
July 773,702 110,529 105,170 629,268 -18.67%
August 884,230 110,529 112,498 741,765 -16.11%
September 994,759 110,529 92,721 834,486 -16.11%
October 1,105,288 110,529 92,721 927,206 -16.11%
November 1,215,817 110,529 92,721 1,019,927 -16.11%
December 1,326,345 110,529 92,721 1,112,648 -16.11%
1,326,345$
Police
Cumulative Monthly Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Trend Budget Trend Actuals Actuals %
January 1,463,015$ 1,463,015$ 1,268,364$ 1,268,364$ -13.30%
February 2,935,499 1,472,484 1,782,532 3,050,897 3.93%
March 4,536,125 1,600,626 1,406,883 4,457,780 -1.73%
April 6,027,914 1,491,788 1,395,506 5,853,286 -2.90%
May 7,719,540 1,691,627 1,390,714 7,244,000 -6.16%
June 9,321,816 1,602,276 1,621,553 8,865,553 -4.89%
July 10,811,305 1,489,489 1,491,493 10,357,045 -4.20%
August 12,237,361 1,426,055 1,331,240 11,688,285 -4.49%
September 13,696,747 1,459,386 1,393,906 13,082,191 -4.49%
October 15,272,089 1,575,342 1,504,658 14,586,849 -4.49%
November 16,950,065 1,677,976 1,602,687 16,189,536 -4.49%
December 18,498,299 1,548,234 1,478,766 17,668,303 -4.49%
18,498,299$
*The monthly budget trend columns are based on a two year trend.
2026
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Summary-City Attorney
2026
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Summary-Police
0
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
700,000
800,000
900,000
1,000,000
1,100,000
1,200,000
1,300,000
1,400,000
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
City Attorney
Current Year Budget Prior Year
0
2,000,000
4,000,000
6,000,000
8,000,000
10,000,000
12,000,000
14,000,000
16,000,000
18,000,000
20,000,000
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Police
Current Year Budget Prior Year
Item 7.3
Packet pg. 126/524
Item 7.3
Packet pg. 126/524
32
GENERAL FUND DEPARTMENT EXPENSE SUMMARY
Planning & Development
Cumulative Monthly Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Trend Budget Trend Actuals Actuals %
January 328,455$ 328,455$ 286,018$ 286,018$ -12.92%
February 700,895 372,440 302,699 588,717 -16.00%
March 1,108,893 407,998 323,645 912,362 -17.72%
April 1,507,850 398,957 298,254 1,210,615 -19.71%
May 1,867,695 359,845 348,978 1,559,594 -16.50%
June 2,238,447 370,752 318,862 1,878,455 -16.08%
July 2,567,104 328,657 303,245 2,181,700 -15.01%
August 2,871,627 304,523 324,809 2,506,509 -12.71%
September 3,319,332 447,705 390,781 2,897,290 -12.71%
October 3,633,719 314,387 274,414 3,171,704 -12.71%
November 3,977,441 343,723 300,020 3,471,724 -12.71%
December 4,326,185 348,744 304,402 3,776,126 -12.71%
4,326,185$
Parks & Recreation
Cumulative Monthly Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Trend Budget Trend Actuals Actuals %
January 416,002$ 416,002$ 367,595$ 367,595$ -11.64%
February 835,006 419,004 392,512 760,107 -8.97%
March 1,312,631 477,625 376,399 1,136,505 -13.42%
April 1,714,475 401,844 376,742 1,513,247 -11.74%
May 2,137,519 423,044 412,576 1,925,823 -9.90%
June 2,558,191 420,672 307,605 2,233,428 -12.70%
July 3,010,169 451,978 504,517 2,737,945 -9.04%
August 3,480,423 470,253 407,984 3,145,929 -9.61%
September 3,912,294 431,871 390,366 3,536,294 -9.61%
October 4,317,827 405,533 366,558 3,902,853 -9.61%
November 4,718,164 400,337 361,862 4,264,714 -9.61%
December 5,167,117 448,953 405,805 4,670,520 -9.61%
5,167,117$
*The monthly budget trend columns are based on a two year trend.
2026
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Summary-Planning & Development
2026
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Summary-Parks & Recreation
0
500,000
1,000,000
1,500,000
2,000,000
2,500,000
3,000,000
3,500,000
4,000,000
4,500,000
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Planning & Development
Current Year Budget Prior Year
0
500,000
1,000,000
1,500,000
2,000,000
2,500,000
3,000,000
3,500,000
4,000,000
4,500,000
5,000,000
5,500,000
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Parks & Recreation
Current Year Budget Prior Year
Item 7.3
Packet pg. 127/524
Item 7.3
Packet pg. 127/524
33
GENERAL FUND DEPARTMENT EXPENSE SUMMARY
Facilities Maintenance
Cumulative Monthly Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Trend Budget Trend Actuals Actuals %
January 242,473$ 242,473$ 179,610$ 179,610$ -25.93%
February 490,971 248,498 170,000 349,609 -28.79%
March 733,425 242,455 188,079 537,688 -26.69%
April 987,110 253,684 175,604 713,292 -27.74%
May 1,185,395 198,285 207,833 921,125 -22.29%
June 1,535,749 350,354 180,002 1,101,127 -28.30%
July 1,738,024 202,275 248,299 1,349,426 -22.36%
August 1,765,212 27,188 162,977 1,512,403 -14.32%
September 1,985,460 220,248 188,705 1,701,108 -14.32%
October 2,191,154 205,694 176,235 1,877,343 -14.32%
November 2,386,521 195,367 167,387 2,044,730 -14.32%
December 2,606,747 220,226 188,686 2,233,416 -14.32%
2,606,747$
Engineering
Cumulative Monthly Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Trend Budget Trend Actuals Actuals %
January 359,857$ 359,857$ 296,618$ 296,618$ -17.57%
February 714,231 354,374 247,021 543,639 -23.88%
March 1,045,901 331,670 265,576 809,215 -22.63%
April 1,389,504 343,603 246,192 1,055,407 -24.04%
May 1,726,994 337,490 316,225 1,371,632 -20.58%
June 2,112,969 385,975 246,381 1,618,013 -23.42%
July 2,434,055 321,085 267,224 1,885,237 -22.55%
August 2,788,117 354,062 295,570 2,180,807 -21.78%
September 3,139,615 351,499 274,935 2,455,742 -21.78%
October 3,475,863 336,248 263,006 2,718,748 -21.78%
November 3,807,315 331,452 259,255 2,978,003 -21.78%
December 4,154,599 347,284 271,638 3,249,641 -21.78%
4,154,599$
*The monthly budget trend columns are based on a two year trend.
2026
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Summary-Facilities Maintenance
2026
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Summary-Engineering
0
300,000
600,000
900,000
1,200,000
1,500,000
1,800,000
2,100,000
2,400,000
2,700,000
3,000,000
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Facilities Maintenance
Current Year Budget Prior Year
0
400,000
800,000
1,200,000
1,600,000
2,000,000
2,400,000
2,800,000
3,200,000
3,600,000
4,000,000
4,400,000
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Engineering
Current Year Budget Prior Year
Item 7.3
Packet pg. 128/524
Item 7.3
Packet pg. 128/524
34
GENERAL FUND DEPARTMENT EXPENSE SUMMARY
Non-Departmental
Cumulative Monthly Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Trend Budget Trend Actuals Actuals %
January 1,009,922$ 1,009,922$ 1,614,683$ 1,614,683$ 59.88%
February 1,354,738 344,817 478,150 2,092,833 54.48%
March 1,816,338 461,600 392,861 2,485,694 36.85%
April 2,189,931 373,592 555,004 3,040,698 38.85%
May 2,521,764 331,833 343,299 3,383,998 34.19%
June 3,063,461 541,697 634,666 4,018,664 31.18%
July 3,389,072 325,611 420,054 4,438,718 30.97%
August 3,982,802 593,730 383,498 4,822,215 21.08%
September 4,634,338 651,536 788,853 5,611,069 21.08%
October 5,351,231 716,893 867,985 6,479,054 21.08%
November 6,034,712 683,481 827,531 7,306,585 21.08%
December 6,955,912 921,200 1,115,352 8,421,937 21.08%
6,955,912$
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Summary-Non-Departmental
2026
*The monthly budget trend columns are based on a two year trend.
0
2,000,000
4,000,000
6,000,000
8,000,000
10,000,000
12,000,000
14,000,000
16,000,000
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Non -Departmental
Current Year Budget Prior Year
Item 7.3
Packet pg. 129/524
Item 7.3
Packet pg. 129/524
35
FUND SUMMARIES
Fund 016 - Building Maintenance Fund
Cumulative Monthly Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Trend Budget Trend Actuals Actuals %
January 154,167$ 154,167$ -$ -$ 0.00%
February 308,333 154,167 4,482 4,482 -98.55%
March 462,500 154,167 13,663 18,145 -96.08%
April 616,666 154,167 77,613 95,757 -84.47%
May 770,833 154,167 51,974 147,731 -80.83%
June 925,000 154,167 246,688 394,420 -57.36%
July 1,079,166 154,167 24,335 418,755 -61.20%
August 1,233,333 154,167 265,939 684,694 -44.48%
September 1,387,499 154,167 85,587 770,281 -44.48%
October 1,541,666 154,167 85,587 855,868 -44.48%
November 1,695,833 154,167 85,587 941,454 -44.48%
December 1,849,999 154,167 85,587 1,027,041 -44.48%
1,849,999$
2026
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Summary-Fund 016 - Building Maintenance Fund
*The monthly budget trend columns are based on a two year trend.
0
200,000
400,000
600,000
800,000
1,000,000
1,200,000
1,400,000
1,600,000
1,800,000
2,000,000
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Fund 016 -Building Maintenance Fund
Current Year Budget Prior Year
Item 7.3
Packet pg. 130/524
Item 7.3
Packet pg. 130/524
36
FUND SUMMARIES
Real Estate Excise Tax 1 & 2
Cumulative Monthly Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Trend Budget Trend Actuals Actuals %
January 180,699$ 180,699$ 102,307$ 102,307$ -43.38%
February 369,890 189,191 170,681 272,988 -26.20%
March 620,117 250,227 417,000 689,988 11.27%
April 968,775 348,659 306,006 995,994 2.81%
May 1,339,598 370,823 321,808 1,317,802 -1.63%
June 2,004,973 665,375 469,164 1,786,966 -10.87%
July 2,359,988 355,015 384,438 2,171,404 -7.99%
August 2,738,388 378,400 366,660 2,538,063 -7.32%
September 3,038,181 299,793 277,862 2,815,925 -7.32%
October 3,439,573 401,392 372,029 3,187,954 -7.32%
November 3,713,484 273,912 253,874 3,441,828 -7.32%
December 4,000,000 286,516 265,556 3,707,384 -7.32%
4,000,000$
Fund 512 - Technology Rental Fund Expenses
Cumulative Monthly Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Trend Budget Trend Actuals Actuals %
January 839,016$ 839,016$ 670,219$ 670,219$ -20.12%
February 983,800 144,784 108,274 778,493 -20.87%
March 1,165,508 181,708 119,702 898,195 -22.94%
April 1,316,718 151,209 116,917 1,015,113 -22.91%
May 1,506,526 189,808 192,912 1,208,025 -19.81%
June 1,655,173 148,647 94,269 1,302,294 -21.32%
July 1,872,333 217,160 110,117 1,412,411 -24.56%
August 2,040,789 168,456 88,316 1,500,727 -26.46%
September 2,227,781 186,992 137,507 1,638,235 -26.46%
October 2,409,853 182,073 133,890 1,772,125 -26.46%
November 2,572,514 162,661 119,615 1,891,740 -26.46%
December 2,782,528 210,014 154,437 2,046,177 -26.46%
2,782,528$
*The monthly budget trend columns are based on a two year trend.
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Revenue Summary-Real Estate Excise Tax 1 & 2
2026
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Summary-Fund 512 - Technology Rental Fund
2026
0
400,000
800,000
1,200,000
1,600,000
2,000,000
2,400,000
2,800,000
3,200,000
3,600,000
4,000,000
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Real Estate Excise Tax 1 & 2
Current Year Budget Prior Year
0
200,000
400,000
600,000
800,000
1,000,000
1,200,000
1,400,000
1,600,000
1,800,000
2,000,000
2,200,000
2,400,000
2,600,000
2,800,000
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Fund 512 -Technology Rental Fund Expenses
Current Year Budget Prior Year
Item 7.3
Packet pg. 131/524
Item 7.3
Packet pg. 131/524
37
FUND 421 – WATER UTILITY FUND SUMMARY
Fund 421 - Water Utility Fund Revenues
Cumulative Monthly Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Trend Budget Trend Actuals Actuals %
January 958,926$ 958,926$ 1,419,376$ 1,419,376$ 48.02%
February 1,588,753 629,828 1,133,661 2,553,038 60.69%
March 2,517,448 928,694 1,496,423 4,049,460 60.86%
April 3,193,768 676,320 1,145,721 5,195,181 62.67%
May 4,118,581 924,813 1,513,622 6,708,803 62.89%
June 4,874,074 755,494 1,457,750 8,166,553 67.55%
July 5,979,594 1,105,520 1,757,355 9,923,908 65.96%
August 10,988,128 5,008,534 1,688,973 11,612,881 5.69%
September 12,357,871 1,369,743 1,447,623 13,060,503 5.69%
October 13,273,924 916,053 968,137 14,028,641 5.69%
November 14,275,600 1,001,676 1,058,628 15,087,269 5.69%
December 15,030,903 755,303 798,247 15,885,516 5.69%
15,030,903$
Fund 421 - Water Utility Fund Expenses
Cumulative Monthly Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Trend Budget Trend Actuals Actuals %
January 2,439,280$ 2,439,280$ 646,512$ 646,512$ -73.50%
February 3,072,014 632,734 651,481 1,297,993 -57.75%
March 3,766,488 694,474 804,949 2,102,942 -44.17%
April 4,498,942 732,454 636,371 2,739,313 -39.11%
May 5,103,171 604,229 775,221 3,514,535 -31.13%
June 6,387,286 1,284,115 1,146,134 4,660,668 -27.03%
July 7,648,612 1,261,326 916,810 5,577,478 -27.08%
August 12,384,668 4,736,056 881,016 6,458,494 -47.85%
September 14,102,790 1,718,122 895,985 7,354,479 -47.85%
October 15,254,823 1,152,033 600,775 7,955,254 -47.85%
November 16,171,171 916,348 477,867 8,433,121 -47.85%
December 18,670,058 2,498,887 1,303,147 9,736,269 -47.85%
18,670,058$
*The monthly budget trend columns are based on a two year trend.
2026
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Revenue Summary-Fund 421 - Water Utility Fund
2026
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Summary-Fund 421 - Water Utility Fund
0
2,000,000
4,000,000
6,000,000
8,000,000
10,000,000
12,000,000
14,000,000
16,000,000
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Fund 421 -Water Utility Fund Revenues
Current Year Budget Prior Year
0
2,000,000
4,000,000
6,000,000
8,000,000
10,000,000
12,000,000
14,000,000
16,000,000
18,000,000
20,000,000
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Fund 421 -Water Utility Fund Expenses
Current Year Budget Prior Year
Item 7.3
Packet pg. 132/524
Item 7.3
Packet pg. 132/524
38
FUND 422 – STORM UTILITY FUND SUMMARY
Fund 422 - Storm Utility Fund Revenues
Cumulative Monthly Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Trend Budget Trend Actuals Actuals %
January 746,538$ 746,538$ 823,415$ 823,415$ 10.30%
February 2,428,365 1,681,827 1,622,271 2,445,685 0.71%
March 3,174,588 746,222 845,699 3,291,384 3.68%
April 3,854,738 680,150 755,651 4,047,035 4.99%
May 4,692,537 837,799 816,321 4,863,356 3.64%
June 5,366,727 674,190 810,202 5,673,558 5.72%
July 6,197,765 831,039 838,301 6,511,859 5.07%
August 9,587,263 3,389,498 1,620,378 8,132,237 -15.18%
September 10,345,345 758,082 643,031 8,775,268 -15.18%
October 11,382,661 1,037,316 879,886 9,655,154 -15.18%
November 12,130,499 747,838 634,341 10,289,495 -15.18%
December 12,850,528 720,029 610,753 10,900,248 -15.18%
12,850,528$
Fund 422 - Storm Utility Fund Expenses
Cumulative Monthly Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Trend Budget Trend Actuals Actuals %
January 650,741$ 650,741$ 584,403$ 584,403$ -10.19%
February 2,116,753 1,466,012 535,481 1,119,884 -47.09%
March 2,767,218 650,466 624,830 1,744,714 -36.95%
April 3,360,091 592,872 459,832 2,204,547 -34.39%
May 4,090,381 730,291 637,083 2,841,629 -30.53%
June 4,678,058 587,677 797,928 3,639,557 -22.20%
July 5,402,456 724,398 968,407 4,607,964 -14.71%
August 8,357,007 2,954,551 564,307 5,172,271 -38.11%
September 9,017,811 660,804 408,981 5,581,252 -38.11%
October 9,922,017 904,205 559,626 6,140,877 -38.11%
November 10,573,890 651,874 403,454 6,544,331 -38.11%
December 11,201,524 627,634 388,451 6,932,783 -38.11%
11,201,524$
*The monthly budget trend columns are based on a two year trend.
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Revenue Summary-Fund 422 - Storm Utility Fund
2026
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Summary-Fund 422 - Storm Utility Fund
2026
0
1,000,000
2,000,000
3,000,000
4,000,000
5,000,000
6,000,000
7,000,000
8,000,000
9,000,000
10,000,000
11,000,000
12,000,000
13,000,000
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Fund 422 -Storm Utility Fund Revenues
Current Year Budget Prior Year
0
1,000,000
2,000,000
3,000,000
4,000,000
5,000,000
6,000,000
7,000,000
8,000,000
9,000,000
10,000,000
11,000,000
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Fund 422 -Storm Utility Fund Expenses
Current Year Budget Prior Year
Item 7.3
Packet pg. 133/524
Item 7.3
Packet pg. 133/524
39
FUND 423 – SEWER UTILITY FUND SUMMARY
Fund 423 - Sewer Utility Fund Revenues
Cumulative Monthly Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Trend Budget Trend Actuals Actuals %
January 1,433,083$ 1,433,083$ 1,606,318$ 1,606,318$ 12.09%
February 2,737,085 1,304,002 1,327,273 2,933,591 7.18%
March 4,238,410 1,501,325 2,177,582 5,111,173 20.59%
April 5,924,788 1,686,378 1,538,395 6,649,568 12.23%
May 8,041,804 2,117,016 1,540,760 8,190,328 1.85%
June 9,165,000 1,123,196 2,248,691 10,439,019 13.90%
July 10,743,639 1,578,639 1,572,117 12,011,135 11.80%
August 14,811,596 4,067,957 2,413,640 14,424,776 -2.61%
September 16,280,297 1,468,701 1,430,345 15,855,120 -2.61%
October 17,524,918 1,244,621 1,212,116 17,067,236 -2.61%
November 19,202,434 1,677,516 1,633,706 18,700,942 -2.61%
December 20,499,448 1,297,014 1,263,141 19,964,083 -2.61%
20,499,448$
Fund 423 - Sewer Utility Fund Expenses
Cumulative Monthly Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Trend Budget Trend Actuals Actuals %
January 1,435,495$ 1,435,495$ 1,558,008$ 1,558,008$ 8.53%
February 2,409,812 974,316 1,086,260 2,644,268 9.73%
March 4,001,259 1,591,447 1,525,922 4,170,190 4.22%
April 5,404,144 1,402,886 1,215,793 5,385,983 -0.34%
May 6,545,404 1,141,260 1,196,913 6,582,897 0.57%
June 8,094,395 1,548,991 2,657,884 9,240,780 14.16%
July 9,267,395 1,173,000 1,243,672 10,484,452 13.13%
August 13,637,317 4,369,922 1,313,205 11,797,657 -13.49%
September 15,002,543 1,365,226 1,181,058 12,978,716 -13.49%
October 16,220,047 1,217,504 1,053,264 14,031,980 -13.49%
November 17,499,493 1,279,446 1,106,850 15,138,830 -13.49%
December 20,052,059 2,552,566 2,208,228 17,347,058 -13.49%
20,052,059$
*The monthly budget trend columns are based on a two year trend.
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Revenue Summary-Fund 423 - Sewer Utility Fund
2026
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Summary-Fund 423 - Sewer Utility Fund
2026
0
2,000,000
4,000,000
6,000,000
8,000,000
10,000,000
12,000,000
14,000,000
16,000,000
18,000,000
20,000,000
22,000,000
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Fund 423 -Sewer Utility Fund Revenues
Current Year Budget Prior Year
0
2,000,000
4,000,000
6,000,000
8,000,000
10,000,000
12,000,000
14,000,000
16,000,000
18,000,000
20,000,000
22,000,000
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Fund 423 -Sewer Utility Fund Expenses
Current Year Budget Prior Year
Item 7.3
Packet pg. 134/524
Item 7.3
Packet pg. 134/524
1
0
6
8
Agenda Item 8.1
Edmonds City Council
Regular Meeting
October 27, 2026
TITLE:Approval of City Council Meeting Minutes (Only One Reading
Required)
DEPARTMENT:City Clerk's Office
PRESENTER:City Clerk's Office
NEEDED FROM COUNCIL:Action
RECOMMENDATION:Review and approve the attached draft minutes on the consent
agenda.
BUDGET:
Total Dollar Amount:$0 ☐ Approved in Budget
Fund(s):N/A ☐ Budget Reallocation Required
☒ No Budget Impact
PROBLEM/ISSUE STATEMENT:
Minutes of all City Council minutes must be recorded and made available to the public pursuant
to RCW 42.30.035.
CONTEXT, ANALYSIS, & ALTERNATIVES:
Not applicable.
BUDGET IMPACTS:
Not applicable.
ITEM HISTORY:
Not applicable.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
ATTACHMENTS:
1. 2026-10-13 Draft Regular Meeting Minutes
2. 2026-10-14 Draft Study Session Minutes
3. 2026-10-20 Draft Finance Committee Minutes
4. 2026-10-20 Draft PPW Committee Minutes
5. 2026-10-20 Draft PSPHSP Committee Minutes
Item 8.1
Packet pg. 135/524
Item 8.1
Packet pg. 135/524
Edmonds City Council Minutes
Regular Meeting
October 13, 2026
Page 1
Edmonds City Council
Regular Meeting
Action Minutes
October 13, 2026
ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT
Mike Rosen, Mayor
Michelle Dotsch, Council President
Chris Eck, Councilmember
Will Chen, Councilmember
Erika Barnett, Councilmember
Susan Paine, Councilmember
Vivian Olson, Councilmember
Jenna Nand, Councilmember
STAFF PRESENT
Michael Clugston, Planning &
Development Director
Deb Powers, Urban Forest Planner
Duane Wakan, Senior Planner
Andy Rheaume, Public Works Director
Kisha Post, Finance Specialist
Richard Gould, Finance Director
Angie Feser, Parks & Recreation
Stephanie Lucash, City Administrator
Jeff Taraday, City Attorney
Luke Lonie, City Clerk
1.CALL TO ORDER / FLAG SALUTE
The Edmonds City Council meeting was called to order at 6:00pm by Mayor Rosen in
the Council Chambers, 250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds, and virtually. The meeting
was opened with the flag salute.
2.LAND ACKNOWLEDGMENT
Councilmember Barnett read the City Council Land Acknowledgment.
3.ROLL CALL
City Clerk Lonie called the roll. All elected officials were present.
4.APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA
COUNCILMEMBER CHEN MOVED TO APPROVE THE AGENDA.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
5.PRESENTATIONS
1.Resolution: Purple Heart City Only One Reading Required – City Council Office
Council President Dotsch read the resolution designating the City of Edmonds
as a Purple Heart City.
2.Mayor’s Finance Update – Mayor’s Office
Item 8.1
Packet pg. 136/524
Item 8.1
Packet pg. 136/524
Edmonds City Council Minutes
Regular Meeting
October 13, 2026
Page 2
Mayor Rosen provided an update on the state of the city’s various tax revenues.
6.AUDIENCE COMMENTS
The following community members provided audience comment:
1. Nora Carlson – Spoke in favor of those who spoke at last week’s public
comment.
2. Ken Reidy – Spoke about the Yost Pool agreement.
7.RECEIVED FOR FILING
1.Written Public Comments Only One Reading Required
2.PW Q3 Capital Projects Report Only One Reading Required
8.APPROVAL OF THE CONSENT AGENDA
Councilmember Olson requested the removal of Consent Agenda Item 8.2, “Yost Pool
- Cascade Swim Club 2026-2036 Operation Agreement,” for separate consideration.
With consensus from the Council, Mayor Rosen added it to Council Business as new
Item 10.4.
COUNCILMEMBER OLSON MOVED TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
The agenda items approved are as follows:
1.Approval of City Council Meeting Minutes Only One Reading Required
3.Approval of Supplemental Agreement with SCJ for the Hwy 99 Revitalization Project
Stage 4 Second Reading
4.Approval of claim checks and wire payment. Only One Reading Required
5.Resolution: Purple Heart City Only One Reading Required
9.PUBLIC HEARINGS
1.Public Hearing to Extend Interim Ordinance No. 4433, File No. AMD2025-0006 Fifth
Reading and Beyond – Planning and Development Services
Michael Clugston, Planning & Development Director, and Deb Powers, Urban
Forest Planner, provided brief background into the Interim Tree Ordinance.
The following community members provided public testimony:
1. Evans Wilson – Spoke against the proposed Tree Code Amendments.
2. Kathleen Sears – Spoke in favor of the proposed Interim Tree Ordinance.
Item 8.1
Packet pg. 137/524
Item 8.1
Packet pg. 137/524
Edmonds City Council Minutes
Regular Meeting
October 13, 2026
Page 3
3. William Bartig – Spoke in favor of proposed Interim Tree Ordinance.
4. Lora Hein – Spoke in favor of the proposed Interim Tree Ordinance.
5. Ken Reidy – Spoke against the proposed Interim Tree Ordinance.
Staff took questions from Council.
2.Public Hearing on Mobile Food Vendor and Unlicensed Food Vendor Code Updates
Fourth Reading – Planning and Development Services
Mike Clugston, Planning & Development Director; Duane Wakan, Senior
Planner; and Andy Rheaume, Public Works Director, provided additional
background into the potential code updates regarding mobile food vending and
unlicensed food vendor regulations.
The following community members provided public testimony:
1. Ken Reidy – Spoke in support of creating a clear framework for the
affected vendors and provided feedback into the draft ordinance.
Staff took questions from Council.
3.Public Hearing on Westgate Neighborhood Center Map Updates Second Reading –
Planning and Development Services
Mike Clugston, Planning & Development Director, provided additional
background into the potential Westgate Neighborhood Center Map updates.
The following community members provided public testimony:
1. Robert Stivers – Expressed concerns with the potential map update.
Staff took questions from Council.
4.Presentation & Public Hearing on Property Taxes First Reading – Finance
Kisha Post, Finance Specialist, and Richard Gould, Finance Director, presented
on the 2027 Property Tax Levy.
No community members provided public testimony.
Staff took questions from Council.
10. COUNCIL BUSINESS
1.Extension of Interim Landmark Tree Ordinance, File No. AMD2025-0006 Fifth
Reading and Beyond – Planning and Development Services
Edmonds City Council Minutes
Regular Meeting
October 13, 2026
Page 4
Deb Powers, Urban Forest Planner, and Mike Clugston, Planning &
Development Director, asked that Council approve the proposed ordinance.
MOTION: Approve an ordinance of the City of Edmonds, Washington, extending
by another six months the interim regulation established by Ordinance
4389 to prohibit the removal of certain landmark trees.
MOVED: Councilmember Paine
SECONDED: Councilmember Eck
RESULT: Pass, 7-0
IN FAVOR: Councilmember Eck, Councilmember Barnett, Council President Dotsch,
Councilmember Chen, Councilmember Olson, Councilmember Paine,
Councilmember Nand
OPPOSED:
2.Short Plat Vacation Interim Ordinance Second Reading – Planning and Development
Services
Mike Clugston, Planning & Development Director, provided additional
background into the need for an interim ordinance creating an interim code to
allow the vacation of a short plat.
MOTION: Adopt the attached interim ordinance and work plan and set the
required public hearing for November 10th, 2026.
MOVED: Councilmember Eck
SECONDED: Councilmember Paine
RESULT: Pass, 7-0
IN FAVOR: Councilmember Eck, Councilmember Barnett, Council President Dotsch,
Councilmember Chen, Councilmember Olson, Councilmember Paine,
Councilmember Nand
OPPOSED:
Council took a brief recess from 7:38 – 7:44 pm.
3.Department Budget Discussions Second Reading – Mayor's Office
Mayor Rosen reviewed the current state of the budget, including actions the
administration and Council have taken to address the budget crisis, as well as
proposed solutions to addressing the future of the crisis.
Kisha Post, Finance Specialist; Andy Rheaume, Public Works Director; Angie
Feser, Parks & Recreation Director; Mike Clugston, Planning & Development
Director; reviewed and explained specific funds including but not limited to
revenues, expenditures, and allowable uses with Council.
Item 8.1
Packet pg. 139/524
Item 8.1
Packet pg. 139/524
Edmonds City Council Minutes
Regular Meeting
October 13, 2026
Page 5
COUNCILMEMBER OLSON MOVED TO EXTEND THE MEETING TO 9:20 PM.
THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
4.Yost Pool - Cascade Swim Club 2026-2036 Operation Agreement Second Reading – Parks
and Recreation
Angie Feser, Parks and Recreation Director, provided background for the Yost
Pool project.
MOTION: Approve the attached final 2026-2036 operation agreement for the Yost
Pool property between the City of Edmonds and the Cascade Swim
Club.
MOVED: Councilmember Olson
SECONDED: Council President Dotsch
RESULT: Pass, 7-0
IN FAVOR: Councilmember Eck, Councilmember Barnett, Council President Dotsch,
Councilmember Chen, Councilmember Olson, Councilmember Paine,
Councilmember Nand
OPPOSED:
11.COUNCIL COMMENTS
Councilmembers commented on various topics.
12.MAYOR'S COMMENTS
Mayor Rosen provided comments.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 9:19 pm.
Item 8.1
Packet pg. 140/524
Item 8.1
Packet pg. 140/524
Edmonds City Council Minutes
Study Session
October 14, 2026
Page 1
Edmonds City Council
Study Session
Meeting Minutes
October 14, 2026
ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT
Mike Rosen, Mayor
Michelle Dotsch, Council President
Chris Eck, Councilmember
Will Chen, Councilmember
Erika Barnett, Councilmember
Susan Paine, Councilmember
Vivian Olson, Councilmember
Jenna Nand, Councilmember
STAFF PRESENT
Shannon Burley, Parks & Recreation
Deputy Director
Angie Feser, Parks & Recreation
Director
Andy Rheaume, Public Works Director
Mike DeLilla, City Engineer
Bertrand Hauss, Transportation
Engineer
Luke Lonie, City Clerk
1.CALL TO ORDER
The Edmonds Council Study Session was called to order virtually and in the City
Council Conference Room, 121 – 5th Avenue North, Edmonds, at 3:00 pm by Council
President Dotsch.
2.STUDY SESSION ITEMS
1.Presentation of 2027 - 2032 Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) and Capital Improvement
Program (CIP) First Reading – Public Works and Utilities
Shannon Burley, Parks & Recreation Deputy Director; Angie Feser, Parks &
Recreation Director; Andy Rheaume, Public Works Director; Mike DeLilla, City
Engineer; Bertrand Hauss, Transportation Engineer presented the 2027 – 2032
Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) and Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and took
questions from Council.
2.Park Impact Fee Study and Code Revision Presentation First Reading – Parks and
Recreation
Angie Feser, Parks & Recreation Director; Kamal Raslan of BERK Consultants;
and Lisa Grueter of BERK Consultants presented on the Park Impact Fee Study
and potential code revisions and took questions from Council.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 4:58 pm.
Item 8.1
Packet pg. 141/524
Item 8.1
Packet pg. 141/524
Edmonds City Council Minutes
Finance Committee
October 20, 2026
Page 11
9
2
5
Edmonds City Council
Finance Committee
Meeting Minutes
October 20, 2026
COMMITTEE MEMBERS PRESENT
Michelle Dotsch, Council President (Ex-
Offico)
Will Chen, Councilmember
Erika Barnett, Councilmember
OTHER ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT
Mike Rosen, Mayor
Chris Eck, Councilmember
Susan Paine, Councilmember
STAFF PRESENT
Richard Gould, Finance Director
Kisha Post, Finance Specialist
Emily Villata, Deputy City Clerk
1.CALL TO ORDER
The Edmonds Council Finance Committee meeting was called to order virtually and in
the City Council Conference Room, 121 – 5th Avenue North, Edmonds, at 1:00 pm by
Councilmember Chen.
2.COMMITTEE BUSINESS
1.August 2026 Monthly Financial Report First Reading – Finance
Richard Gould (Finance Director) and Kisha Post (Finance Specialist) presented the
report on the City’s August 2026 financial status.
Committee Recommendation: Informational
2.Financial Policy - Financial Reporting Third Reading – Finance
Kisha Post (Finance Specialist) summarized the Finance Committee’s previous
discussions regarding the City’s Financial Reporting Policy from their March and
April meetings. Council discussed potential updates to the policy that would better
align reporting with its core purposes of consistency and clarity.
Committee Recommendation: Move Forward with Developing Potential Updates
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 1:58 pm.
Item 8.1
Packet pg. 142/524
Item 8.1
Packet pg. 142/524
Edmonds City Council Minutes
Parks and Public Works (PPW) Committee
October 20, 2026
Page 1
Edmonds City Council
Parks and Public Works (PPW) Committee
Meeting Minutes
October 20, 2026
COMMITTEE MEMBERS PRESENT
Michelle Dotsch, Council President (Ex-
Offico)
Chris Eck, Councilmember
Vivian Olson, Councilmember
STAFF PRESENT
Angie Feser, Parks Director
Andy Rheaume, Public Works Director
Ryan Hague, Stormwater Engineer
Russell Lynch, Capital Projects Manager
Emily Villata, Deputy City Clerk
1.CALL TO ORDER
The Edmonds Council Parks and Public Works (PPW) Committee meeting was called
to order virtually and in the City Council Conference Room, 121 – 5th Avenue North,
Edmonds, at 3:00 pm by Councilmember Olson.
2.COMMITTEE BUSINESS
1.Lien Placement #3 on Civic Park Property for Boys & Girls Club New Facility First
Reading – Parks and Recreation
Angie Feser (Parks Director) introduced the proposed lien on the new Boys &
Girls Club facility currently under construction at Civic Park.
Committee Recommendation: Move to Consent Agenda
2.Waterfront Buoy Permit Contract Amendment First Reading – Parks and Recreation
Angie Feser (Parks Director) shared background of the contract amendment,
noting the increased amount due to specialized services needed to meet new
requirements from Department of Natural Resources.
Committee Recommendation: Move to Consent Agenda
3.Presentation to Award a Construction Contract for the Olympic View Drive
Pavement Preservation Project First Reading – Engineering
Ryan Hague (Stormwater Engineer) shared the bid summary of the new
pavement preservation project which resulted in an overall savings for the City.
Council asked questions around validating bidder qualifications.
Committee Recommendation: Move to Consent Agenda
4.Presentation of Amendment to Professional Services Agreement for Yost & Seaview
Item 8.1
Packet pg. 143/524
Item 8.1
Packet pg. 143/524
Edmonds City Council Minutes
Parks and Public Works (PPW) Committee
October 20, 2026
Page 2
Reservoirs Project First Reading – Engineering
Ryan Hague (Stormwater Engineer) presented the contract amendment which
would ensure the availability of the original design consultant for assistance
during the project’s construction phase. Council expressed appreciation for the
clear and thorough work put forward by Engineering staff on their agenda
items.
Committee Recommendation: Move to Consent Agenda
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 3:15 pm.
Item 8.1
Packet pg. 144/524
Item 8.1
Packet pg. 144/524
Edmonds City Council Minutes
Public Safety, Planning, Human Services, and Personnel (PSPHSP) Committee
October 20, 2026
Page 11
9
4
7
Edmonds City Council
Public Safety, Planning, Human Services, and
Personnel (PSPHSP) Committee
Meeting Minutes
October 20, 2026
COMMITTEE MEMBERS PRESENT
Michelle Dotsch, Council President (Ex-
Offico)
Susan Paine, Councilmember
Jenna Nand, Councilmember
OTHER ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT
Mike Rosen, Mayor
Chris Eck, Councilmember
Erika Barnett, Councilmember
Vivian Olson, Councilmember
STAFF PRESENT
Loi Dawkins, Chief of Police
Ryan Hague, Stormwater Engineer
Mike DeLilla, City Engineer
Andy Rheaume, Public Works Director
Duane Wakan, Senior Planner
Jennifer Lambert, Engineering Program
Manager
Emily Villata, Deputy City Clerk
1.CALL TO ORDER
The Edmonds Council Public Safety, Planning, Human Services, and Personnel
(PSPHSP) Committee meeting was called to order virtually and in the City Council
Conference Room, 121 – 5th Avenue North, Edmonds, at 4:30 pm by Councilmember
Nand.
2.COMMITTEE BUSINESS
1.Update: Police Department Patrol Staffing Levels Only One Reading Required – Police
Services
Loi Dawkins (Chief of Police) provided an overview of the Police Department’s
current staffing levels, noting an officer-per-citizen rate within .3 points of the
current Washington State average.
Committee Recommendation: Informational
2.New E-Bike Ordinance – Chapter 5.75 First Reading – Police Services
Loi Dawkins (Chief of Police) introduced a proposed ordinance
addressing operating speeds, helmet requirements, age restrictions, pedestrian
safety, appropriate use of sidewalks, and shared-use paths/public spaces. Council
provided feedback.
Committee Recommendation: Move to Full Council Business
3.Family Burial Grounds Permanent Regulations First Reading – Planning and
Development Services
Item 8.1
Packet pg. 145/524
Item 8.1
Packet pg. 145/524
Edmonds City Council Minutes
Public Safety, Planning, Human Services, and Personnel (PSPHSP) Committee
October 20, 2026
Page 21
9
4
7
Duane Wakan (Senior Planner) and Mike Clugston (Planning Director) provided
background information on the temporary moratorium currently in place. The
proposed ordinance would permanently prohibit family burial grounds on
private property in alignment with the Planning Board’s recommendation. Next
steps were outlined including a public hearing held on November 10th prior to
any final action from Council.
Committee Recommendation: Move to Full Council Business
4.Deer Creek Critical Aquifer Recharge Area Draft Code and Next Steps First Reading –
Planning and Development Services
Mike Clugston (Planning Director) introduced the latest version of the proposed
code amendments which were drafted utilizing results from a recently
conducted study regarding polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in the Deer Creek
Critical Aquifer Recharge Area (CARA). Council engaged in question and
discussion with Planning and Public Works employees.
Committee Recommendation: Move to Full Council Business
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 5:41 pm.
Item 8.1
Packet pg. 146/524
Item 8.1
Packet pg. 146/524
1
0
8
9
Agenda Item 8.2
Edmonds City Council
Regular Meeting
October 27, 2026
TITLE:Approval of claim checks and wire payment. (Only One Reading
Required)
DEPARTMENT:Finance
PRESENTER:Richard Gould
NEEDED FROM COUNCIL:Action
RECOMMENDATION:Approval of claim checks and wire payment.
BUDGET:
Total Dollar Amount:$694,806.12 ☒ Approved in Budget
Fund(s):various ☐ Budget Reallocation Required
☐ No Budget Impact
PROBLEM/ISSUE STATEMENT:
Approval of claim checks #284030 - #284172 dated October 14, 2026 for $682,110.28 and wire
payment of $12,695.84.
CONTEXT, ANALYSIS, & ALTERNATIVES:
The Council President shall be designated as the auditing committee for the city council. The
council president shall review the documentation supporting claims paid and review for
approval by the city council at its next regular public meeting all checks or warrants issued in
payment of any claim, demand or voucher. A list of each claim, demand or voucher approved
and each check or warrant issued indicating the check or warrant number, the amount paid and
the vendor or payee shall be filed in the city council office for review by individual
councilmembers prior to each regularly scheduled public meeting.
BUDGET IMPACTS:
$694,806.12
ITEM HISTORY:
N/A
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
ATTACHMENTS:
N/A
Item 8.2
Packet pg. 147/524
Item 8.2
Packet pg. 147/524
1
0
8
7
Agenda Item 8.3
Edmonds City Council
Regular Meeting
October 27, 2026
TITLE:Approval of payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire
payments. (Only One Reading Required)
DEPARTMENT:Finance
PRESENTER:Richard Gould
NEEDED FROM COUNCIL:Action
RECOMMENDATION:Approval of payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire
payments.
BUDGET:
Total Dollar Amount:$1,749,902.85 ☒ Approved in Budget
Fund(s):Various ☐ Budget Reallocation Required
☐ No Budget Impact
PROBLEM/ISSUE STATEMENT:
In accordance with the State statutes, City payments must be approved by the City Council.
Ordinance #2896 delegates this approval to the Council President who reviews and
recommends either
approval or non-approval of payments.
CONTEXT, ANALYSIS, & ALTERNATIVES:
Approval of direct deposit for $37,838.73 for the Kelly Day Buy Back, payroll checks #66538 and
#66539 dated October 20, 2026 for $3,172.22, direct deposit for $832,879.61, benefit checks
#66540 through #66548 and wire payments of $876,012.29 for the pay period of October 1,
2026 through October 15,2026.
BUDGET IMPACTS:
$1,749,902.85
ITEM HISTORY:
N/A
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment #1 – 10-01-2026 to 10-15-2026 Payroll Earnings Summary Report
Attachment #2 – 10-01-2026 to 10-15-2026 Benefit Summary Report
Attachment #3 – Kelly Day Buy Back Payroll Earnings Summary Report
Item 8.3
Packet pg. 148/524
Item 8.3
Packet pg. 148/524
Payroll Earnings Summary Report
City of Edmonds
Pay Period: 1,215 (10/01/2026 to 10/15/2026)
Hours AmountHour Type Hour Class Description
NO PAY LEAVEABSENT111 2.00 0.00
NO PAY NON HIREDABSENT112 32.00 0.00
UNPAID L & IABSENT118 88.00 0.00
SICK LEAVESICK121 822.75 45,423.08
VACATIONVACATION122 936.25 56,761.78
HOLIDAY HOURSHOLIDAY123 84.00 5,024.48
FLOATER HOLIDAYHOLIDAY124 87.00 4,496.97
COMPENSATORY TIMECOMP HOURS125 161.75 8,863.32
Holiday Bank WWTPHOLIDAY128 -4.00 0.75
BEREAVEMENTBEREAVEMENT141 36.00 2,069.63
KELLY DAYS BUY BACKKELLY DAY149 18.00 1,306.73
Kelly Day UsedREGULAR HOURS150 107.50 7,722.22
COMPTIME BUY BACKCOMP HOURS152 18.88 1,230.85
HOLIDAY BUY BACKHOLIDAY153 -45.50 -3,303.12
COMPTIME AUTO PAYCOMP HOURS155 54.75 3,956.57
SICK LEAVE PAYOFFSICK157 90.55 8,096.47
VACATION PAYOFFVACATION158 173.72 14,898.69
MANAGEMENT LEAVEVACATION160 61.50 5,269.08
REGULAR HOURSREGULAR HOURS190 16,569.20 932,715.63
LIGHT DUTYREGULAR HOURS196 196.50 13,696.71
OVERTIME-STRAIGHTOVERTIME HOURS210 14.00 522.94
WATER WATCH STANDBYMISCELLANEOUS215 60.00 4,757.54
STANDBY TREATMENT PLANTMISCELLANEOUS216 16.00 2,429.85
OVERTIME 1.5OVERTIME HOURS220 472.25 47,278.22
OVERTIME-DOUBLEOVERTIME HOURS225 14.75 1,692.44
MISC PAYMISCELLANEOUS400 0.00 54.35
Medical Opt OutMISCELLANEOUS404 0.00 300.00
WORKING OUT OF CLASSMISCELLANEOUS410 0.00 3,703.40
SHIFT DIFFERENTIALSHIFT DIFFERENTIAL411 0.00 1,744.08
RETROACTIVE PAYRETROACTIVE PAY600 0.00 3,048.69
ACCRUED COMP 1.0COMP HOURS602 33.00 0.00
ACCRUED COMP TIME 1.5COMP HOURS604 166.00 0.00
ACCRUED COMP 2.0COMP HOURS606 6.00 0.00
10/16/2026 Page 1 of 3
Item 8.3
Packet pg. 149/524
Packet pg. 149/524
Payroll Earnings Summary Report
City of Edmonds
Pay Period: 1,215 (10/01/2026 to 10/15/2026)
Hours AmountHour Type Hour Class Description
ACCREDITATION PAYMISCELLANEOUSacc 0.00 205.00
ACCRED/POLICE SUPPORTMISCELLANEOUSacs 0.00 234.62
Ancilary Duty PayREGULAR HOURSanc 0.00 289.21
Ancilary Duty PayREGULAR HOURSanc2 0.00 1,518.85
Ancilary Duty PayREGULAR HOURSanc3 0.00 1,441.52
BOC II CertificationMISCELLANEOUSboc 0.00 125.70
TRAINING CORPORALMISCELLANEOUScpl 0.00 241.76
CERTIFICATION III PAYMISCELLANEOUScrt 0.00 125.70
Detective 4%MISCELLANEOUSdet4 0.00 1,145.74
EDUCATION PAY 2%EDUCATION PAYed1 0.00 614.99
EDUCATION PAY 4%EDUCATION PAYed2 0.00 737.30
EDUCATION PAY 6%EDUCATION PAYed3 0.00 11,758.28
FAMILY MEDICAL/NON PAIDABSENTfmla 12.00 0.00
FAMILY MEDICAL/SICKSICKfmls 355.00 21,309.52
Family Medical Leave VacationVACATIONfmlv 89.00 5,063.29
K-9 AssignmentMISCELLANEOUSk9 0.00 262.70
LANGUAGE PAYMISCELLANEOUSlan 0.00 1,050.00
LONGEVITY PAY 2%LONGEVITYlg1 0.00 1,237.51
LONGEVITY PAY 2.5%LONGEVITYlg11 0.00 829.18
Longevity 9%LONGEVITYlg12 0.00 2,105.42
Longevity 7%LONGEVITYlg13 0.00 1,765.52
Longevity 5%LONGEVITYlg14 0.00 2,117.94
Longevity 1.5%LONGEVITYlg16 0.00 115.14
LONGEVITY 6%LONGEVITY PAYlg3 0.00 571.44
Longevity 1%LONGEVITYlg4 0.00 1,115.86
Longevity 3%LONGEVITYlg5 0.00 3,377.57
Longevity 1.5%LONGEVITYlg7 0.00 793.85
Medical Leave Absent (unpaid)ABSENTmela 12.00 0.00
Paid Family Medical -Comp UsedCOMP HOURSpfmc 21.00 1,059.53
Paid Family Medical Unpaid/SupABSENTpfmp 116.75 0.00
Paid FAMILY MEDICAL/SICKSICKpfms -27.00 -1,557.56
Paid Family Medical VacationVACATIONpfmv 46.25 2,388.41
PHYSICAL FITNESS PAYMISCELLANEOUSphy 0.00 3,257.54
10/16/2026 Page 2 of 3
Item 8.3
Packet pg. 150/524
Packet pg. 150/524
Payroll Earnings Summary Report
City of Edmonds
Pay Period: 1,215 (10/01/2026 to 10/15/2026)
Hours AmountHour Type Hour Class Description
PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS SMISCELLANEOUSprof 0.00 262.70
Special Ops SergeantMISCELLANEOUSsop 0.00 262.70
PSET SergeantMISCELLANEOUSstr 0.00 262.70
SWAT/NegotiatorsMISCELLANEOUSswat 0.00 662.28
Traffic Officer - CarMISCELLANEOUStraf 0.00 662.28
Total Net Pay: $836,051.83
$1,241,175.5420,897.85
10/16/2026 Page 3 of 3
Item 8.3
Packet pg. 151/524
Packet pg. 151/524
Benefit Checks Summary Report
City of Edmonds
Pay Period: 1,215 - 10/01/2026 to 10/15/2026
Bank: usbank - US Bank
Direct DepositCheck AmtNamePayee #DateCheck #
66540 10/20/2026 bpas BPAS 10,054.95 0.00
66541 10/20/2026 epoa2 EPOA-POLICE 6,279.00 0.00
66542 10/20/2026 epoa3 EPOA-POLICE SUPPORT 1,290.00 0.00
66543 10/20/2026 icma MISSIONSQUARE PLAN SERVICES 6,515.63 0.00
66544 10/20/2026 flex NAVIA BENEFIT SOLUTIONS 7,048.76 0.00
66545 10/20/2026 garn SIDERIUS LONERGAN & MARTIN LLP 2,680.17 0.00
66546 10/20/2026 teamcom TEAMSTERS LOCAL 763 500.00 0.00
66547 10/20/2026 teams TEAMSTERS LOCAL 763 6,669.00 0.00
66548 10/20/2026 tx TEXAS CHILD SUPPORT SDU 634.50 0.00
41,672.01 0.00
Bank: wire - US BANK
Direct DepositCheck AmtNamePayee #DateCheck #
4069 10/20/2026 awc AWC 463,318.84 0.00
4075 10/20/2026 us US BANK 175,040.50 0.00
4076 10/20/2026 mebt WTRISC FBO #N3177B1 147,818.77 0.00
4077 10/20/2026 wadc WASHINGTON STATE TREASURER 39,597.50 0.00
4079 10/20/2026 pb NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTION 7,935.17 0.00
4081 10/20/2026 oe OFFICE OF SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT 629.50 0.00
834,340.28 0.00
876,012.29 0.00Grand Totals:
Page 1 of 110/16/2026
Item 8.3
Packet pg. 152/524
Item 8.3
Packet pg. 152/524
Payroll Earnings Summary Report
City of Edmonds
Pay Period: 1,292 (10/14/2026 to 10/15/2026)
Hours AmountHour Type Hour Class Description
KELLY DAYS BUY BACKKELLY DAY149 600.00 45,309.87
Total Net Pay:$37,838.73
$45,309.87 600.00
10/16/2026 Page 1 of 1
Item 8.3
Packet pg. 153/524
Item 8.3
Packet pg. 153/524
1
0
6
9
Agenda Item 8.4
Edmonds City Council
Regular Meeting
October 27, 2026
TITLE:Lien Placement #3 on Civic Park Property for Boys & Girls Club
New Facility (Second Reading)
DEPARTMENT:Parks and Recreation
PRESENTER:Angie Feser, Director
NEEDED FROM COUNCIL:Action
RECOMMENDATION:City Council authorize the Mayor to execute the attached
Resolution and related documents which allows placement of a
lien on city-owned property located within Civic Center Playfield
Park as required by the State of Washington Department of
Commerce so the Boys & Girls Club Snohomish County may
receive funding enabling construction of the new facility on city
property.
BUDGET:
Total Dollar Amount:$0 ☐ Approved in Budget
Fund(s):N/A ☐ Budget Reallocation Required
☒ No Budget Impact
PROBLEM/ISSUE STATEMENT:
The Boys & Girls Club of Snohomish County (BGCSC) currently operates their Edmonds program
in a city-owned building located in Civic Center Playfield Park (Civic Park) through a lease
agreement. In February 2023 the agreement was renewed and modified into a ground lease to
allow the construction of a new facility. Section 4.4 of the Ground Lease addresses liens and
requires BGCSC must receive approval by the city for any liens placed on the city property in the
process of building the new facility. The BGCSC has received an additional grant from the State
of Washington Department of Commerce which requires a lien placement on the property
where the new club is being constructed. This property is owned by the city and therefore
requires authorization of the city council for the BGCSC to receive the funding. This is the third
time this lien request has come from the BGCSC with the previous two being approved.
The mechanism to complete this is the attached Resolution including the documents listed
below. All documents have been reviewed by legal counsel.
Award Contract #24-96656-504
1. Restrictive Covenant
2. Esopple Affdavit
3. Owner’s Affidavit
4. Leasehold Deed of Trust
Item 8.4
Packet pg. 154/524
Item 8.4
Packet pg. 154/524
1
0
6
9
CONTEXT, ANALYSIS, & ALTERNATIVES:
Alternatives include –
1. Not approving the Resolution which enables the Boys & Girls Club of Snohomish County to
meet grant award requirements to receive funding necessary to construct the new facility.
RECOMMENDATION:
City Council authorize the Mayor to execute the attached Resolution and related documents
which allows placement of a lien on city-owned property located within Civic Center Playfield
Park as required by the State of Washington Department of Commerce so the Boys & Girls Club
Snohomish County may receive funding enabling construction of the new facility on city
property.
BUDGET IMPACTS:
None.
ITEM HISTORY:
September 17, 2024 Parks & Public Works Committee, Resolution to Approve Placement of Lien
on Civic Park Property (Lien Placement #1)
September 24, 2024 Regular Council Meeting, Resolution to Approve Placement of Lien on Civic
Park Property (Lien #1)
October 21, 2025 Council Committee of the Whole, Lien Placement on Civic Park Property for
Boys & Girls Club New Facility (Lien #2)
October 28, 2025 Regular Council Meeting, Lien Placement on Civic Park Property for Boys &
Girls Club New Facility (Lien #2)
October 20, 2026 Parks & Public Works Committee Meeting – this agenda item.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
ATTACHMENTS:
1)Edmonds - BGCSC Lien #3 Resolution - a Resolution to Approve Placement of Liens on Civic
Park Property Dept of Commerce and Related Attachments
2) 2023 Boys and Girls Club Ground Lease - Fully Executed
Item 8.4
Packet pg. 155/524
Item 8.4
Packet pg. 155/524
RESOLUTION NO. _____
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON, TO AUTHORIZE THE PLACEMENT OF A LIEN ON THE
PROPERTY THAT IS THE SUBJECT OF THE GROUND LEASE WITH
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY FOR THE RELATED
CAPITAL PROJECT FINANCING.
WHEREAS, in 2023, the City of Edmonds and the Boys & Girls Clubs of Snohomish County
(“BGCSC”) entered into a Ground Lease relating to certain Civic Park property described therein (the
“Property”) to be used for the construction of a new Boys & Girls Club; and
WHEREAS, the Ground Lease provides for the procedures to be used in relation to this capital project,
including the requirement at Section 4.3 (“No Liens”) that BGCSC obtain the City’s prior written
approval before encumbering the Property with any lien; and
WHEREAS, in 2024, the City approved the placement of two liens on the Property when needed for the
BGCSC to obtain construction financing from Snohomish County and Coastal Community Bank; and
WHEREAS, in 2025, the City approved the placement of two additional liens on the Property when
needed to obtain additional funding from the Washington State Department of Commerce; and
WHEREAS, the BGCSC has informed the City that it has obtained approval for additional funding
from the Washington State Department of Commerce in support of the Boys & Girls Club capital
project, which is being provided under a grant contract requiring a lien, on the condition that the
Property be used as collateral; and
WHEREAS, copies of the requested lien, in the form of a Leasehold Deeds of Trust and its related
documents, including a Restrictive Covenant related to the grant contract, are attached hereto and
incorporated herein by this reference; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the placement of the requested lien on the Property in
support of the BGCSC’s capital project financing pursuant to the Ground Lease is appropriate; NOW,
THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, HEREBY
RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
In accordance with Section 4.3 of the Ground Lease between the City and the Boys & Girls Clubs of
Snohomish County, the use of the Property that is the subject thereof as collateral for financing the new
Boys & Girls Club capital project, as set forth in the four (4) documents attached hereto, representing
the requested lien, is hereby approved.
Item 8.4
Packet pg. 156/524
Item 8.4
Packet pg. 156/524
RESOLVED this _____ day of __________ 2026.
CITY OF EDMONDS
_______________________
MAYOR, MIKE ROSEN
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: RESOLUTION NO. ____
Item 8.4
Packet pg. 157/524
Item 8.4
Packet pg. 157/524
1
When Recorded Return To: The Washington State Department of Commerce Local Government Division 1500 Jefferson St. SE Olympia, Washington 98501 Early Learning Facilities Attention: Real Estate Development and Services ______________________________________________________________________________________ RESTRICTIVE COVENANT Grantor: City of Edmonds Grantee: Department of Commerce, Community Capital Facilities Legal Description (abbreviated): PTN LOTS 1-4, BLK 100, PLAT OF CITY OF EDMONDS; AND PTN VACATED ALLEY AND STREETS Assessor’s Tax Parcel ID#: 004342-100-000-00 IOP Contract Number: 24-96656-504 This Restrictive Covenant is made this 17th day of August, 2026, by City of Edmonds, a Washington Municipal Corporation, ("Grantor") and is part of the consideration for the financial assistance provided to Boys & Girls Clubs of Snohomish County by the Washington State Department of Commerce ("Department"), pursuant to Contract Number 24-96656-504, for the real property (the “Property”) addressed as 310 6th Avenue North, Edmonds, Washington 98020, which is legally described as follows: A PORTION OF LOTS 1 THROUGH 4, BLOCK 100, PLAT OF CITY OF EDMONDS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 2 OF PLATS, PAGE 39; AND A PORTION OF SPRAGUE STREET AND THAT UNNAMED ALLEY WITHIN BLOCK 100 OF SAID PLAT, BOTH AS VACATED BY CITY OF EDMONDS ORDINANCE NO. 4028 RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 201606230342, RECORDS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENClNG AT THE INTERSECTION OF SPRAGUE STREET AND 6TH AVENUE NORTH; THENCE SOUTH 01°14'42" WEST, ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF SAID 6TH AVENUE NORTH, 31.34 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89°23'16" EAST, 36.09 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION OF THE BACK OF A CONCRETE SIDEWALK AND THE NORTHERLY CONCRETE EDGE OF A PLANTING STRIP, AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 89°23'16" EAST. ALONG SAID NORTHERLY CONCRETE EDGE, 11.02 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION OF SAID CONCRETE EDGE WITH A SEAM IN THE TOE OF A CONCRETE WALL; THENCE NORTH 00°36'44'' EAST ALONG SAID SEAM, 2.03 FEET TO AN ANGLE POINT IN SAID SEAM AND WALL;
Item 8.4
Packet pg. 158/524
Item 8.4
Packet pg. 158/524
2
THENCE SOUTH 88°41'54'' EAST, CONTINUING ALONG SAID SEAM AND ITS EXTENSION, 92.89 FEET TO A POINT 0.62 FEET WESTERLY OF AN ANGLE POINT IN SAID SEAM; THENCE SOUTH 01°17"03" WEST ALONG THE EASTERLY EDGE OF A CONCRETE CURB AND ITS EXTENSION, 116.14 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY EDGE OF SAID CONCRETE CURB; THENCE NORTH 88°42'22" WEST 104.08 FEET TO INTERSECT THE BACK OF A CONCRETE SIDEWALK: THENCE NORTH 01°23'10" EAST, 114.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH, STATE OF WASHINGTON.
This Covenant will be filed and recorded in the official public land records of Snohomish County, Washington, and shall constitute a restriction upon the use of the Property and is construed as running with the land, which shall pass to and be binding upon the Grantor and any successors, assigns, heirs, grantees, or lessees of the Property, commencing upon the date specified in Commerce contract number 24-96656-504 and ending ten (10) years from said date. Each and every
contract, deed, or other instrument covering or conveying the Property, or any portion thereof, shall be conclusively held to have been executed, delivered, and accepted subject to such covenants, regardless of whether such covenants are set
forth in such contract, deed, or other instruments. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby covenanted, as follows:
Grantor its successors and/or assigns for the period as stated above shall provide, on the herein described real property, to provide an early learning facility as specified in Commerce contract number 24-96656-504.
The Grantor shall require that all operators, tenants, or lessees comply with all State and local codes, licensing
requirements, and other requirements regarding the condition of the structure and the operation of the project in the jurisdiction in which the facility is located.
The Grantor will keep any records and make any reports relating to compliance with this covenant that the Department
may reasonably require.
DEFAULT: If a violation of this Covenant occurs, the Department (or its successor agency) may, after thirty (30) days’ notice and opportunity to cure the violation, which cure may be effected by the Grantor and/or its Investor Member (as
defined in the Contract), institute and prosecute any proceeding at law or equity to abate, default the loan, prevent, or enjoin any such violation or to compel specific performance by the Grantor of its obligations hereunder; provided that,
the Grantor shall not be required by any provision herein to evict a residential tenant. No delay in enforcing the provisions hereof as to any breach or violation shall impair, damage, or waive the right of any party entitled to enforce the provisions
hereof or to obtain relief against or recover for the continuation or repetition of such breach or violations or any similar breach or violation hereof at any later time.
The Department agrees to execute a Release of Restrictive Covenant at the conclusion of the ten-year period and will not
unreasonably withhold appropriate signatures on such a release. [SIGNATURE AND NOTARY PAGE FOLLOWS]
Item 8.4
Packet pg. 159/524
Item 8.4
Packet pg. 159/524
3
IN WITNESS HEREOF, City of Edmonds, has executed this Covenant on the ___ day of ____________________, 20___. City of Edmonds, a Washington Municipal Corporation
By: Printed Name:
Title:
STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss. COUNTY OF )
On this day personally appeared before me __________________________ known to be the _________________________________ of City of Edmonds, a Washington Municipal Corporation, the entity that executed the within instrument and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said
entity for the uses and purposes therein mentioned and on oath stated that s/he was authorized to execute the same.
DATED:_______________________________________ (Seal or Stamp) (Signature of Notary) (Legibly Print or Stamp Name of Notary)
NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the state of Washington My Commission Expires:
Item 8.4
Packet pg. 160/524
Item 8.4
Packet pg. 160/524
1 4934-2883-3739, v. 1
ESTOPPEL AFFIDAVIT
The CITY OF EDMONDS, a municipal corporation of the State of Washington (“Grantor”), and BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY, a Washington nonprofit corporation (“Grantee”), are parties to a Ground Lease that was made effective February 2, 2023 which replaced the 2015 Lease, effective October 29, 2015 (“Lease”). The Parties certify and affirm as follows:
1. Lease. That certain Ground Lease by and between Grantor and Grantee (“Lease”) was made effective February 2, 2023 which replaced the 2015 Lease, effective October 29, 2015. 2. Premises. The Lease is for the real estate, including those buildings, improvements
and facilities now existing or hereafter erected, located on the real property at 310 6th Ave N,
Edmonds, WA 98020 consisting of Tax Parcel No. 00434210000000, and legally described as follows: A PORTION OF LOTS 1 THROUGH 4, BLOCK 100, PLAT OF CITY OF
EDMONDS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN
VOLUME 2 OF PLATS, PAGE 39; AND A PORTION OF SPRAGUE STREET AND THAT UNNAMED ALLEY WITHIN BLOCK 100 OF SAID PLAT, BOTH AS VACATED BY CITY OF EDMONDS ORDINANCE NO. 4028 RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR’S FILE NO. 201606230342, RECORDS OF SNOHOMISH
COUNTY, WASHINGTON, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE INTERSECTION OF SPRAGUE STREET AND 6TH AVENUE NORTH;
THENCE SOUTH 01°14’42” WEST, ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF SAID 6TH
AVENUE NORTH, 31.34 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89°23’16” EAST, 36.09 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION OF THE BACK OF A CONCRETE SIDEWALK AND THE NORTHERLY CONCRETE EDGE OF A PLANTING STRIP, AND THE POINT OF
BEGINNING;
THENCE SOUTH 89°23’16” EAST, ALONG SAID NORTHERLY CONCRETE EDGE, 11.02 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION OF SAID CONCRETE EDGE WITH A SEAM IN THE TOE OF A CONCRETE WALL; THENCE NORTH 00°36’44” EAST, ALONG SAID SEAM, 2.03 FEET TO AN
ANGLE POINT IN SAID SEAM AND WALL;
THENCE SOUTH 88°41’54” EAST, CONTINUING ALONG SAID SEAM AND ITS EXTENSION, 92.89 FEET TO A POINT 0.62 FEET WESTERLY OF AN ANGLE POINT IN SAID SEAM; THENCE SOUTH 01°17’03” EAST, WEST ALONG THE EASTERLY EDGE
OF A CONCRETE CURB AND ITS EXTENSION, 116.14 FEET TO A POINT
ON THE SOUTHERLY EDGE OF SAID CONCRETE CURB; THENCE NORTH 88°42’22” WEST 104.08 FEET TO INTERSECT THE BACK OF A CONCRETE SIDEWALK;
Item 8.4
Packet pg. 161/524
Item 8.4
Packet pg. 161/524
2 4934-2883-3739, v. 1
THENCE NORTH 01°23’10” EAST, 114.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
Situate in Snohomish County, Washington. 3. Term. The Term of the Lease is forty (40) years commencing January 1, 2023. The Lease may be extended by Grantee for an additional period of fifteen (15) years.
4. Binding. The Lease remains in full force and effect as written. 5. Defaults. There are no uncured defaults under the Lease by either Landlord or Tenant.
The purpose of this Estoppel Affidavit is to give notice of the Lease for the Washington Department of Commerce as part of Grantee’s participation in the Early Learning Facilities Program. Grantee is receiving a grant under the Early Learning Facilities Program, award Contract #24-96656-504. This affidavit does not alter or affect any term or condition of the Lease. The
terms and provisions in the Lease are incorporated into and made a part of this affidavit. If a
provision in this affidavit conflicts with a provision in the Lease, the provision in the Lease will control. Dated: , 2026.
CITY OF EDMONDS Date:___________________________ _____________________________________
Mike Rosen, Mayor
ATTEST:
_____________________________________ _______________________, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________________ Office of the City Attorney
Item 8.4
Packet pg. 162/524
Item 8.4
Packet pg. 162/524
3 4934-2883-3739, v. 1
STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss.
COUNTY OF _________________ )
I certify that I have evidence that Mike Rosen is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that he signed this instrument, on oath stated that he was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the Mayor of the CITY OF EDMONDS, to be the
free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument.
DATED: ______________________, 2026.
____________________________________
PRINTED NAME: ________________________ NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington. My commission expires: _______________
Item 8.4
Packet pg. 163/524
Item 8.4
Packet pg. 163/524
AFFIDAVIT AND INDEMNITY BY OWNER
WHEREAS the undersigned is the owner (“Owner”) of the land (the Land) described in that certain Commitment for Title Insurance issued by CHICAGO TITLE COMPANY (the Company) under No. _________________ (the Commitment), for an ALTA loan policy of title insurance (the “Policy”),
AND WHEREAS, the Proposed Insured(s) under said Commitment is/are requesting the Company to issue its
Policy with Extended Coverage, and to delete therefrom the General Exceptions relating to matters not disclosed by a search of the Public Records such as rights or claims of parties in possession, statutory lien rights for labor or materials, special assessments and utility charges, and/or defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records, or attaching subsequent to the
effective date thereof but prior to the date the Insured acquires of record for value the estate or interest or
mortgage thereon covered by the commitment,
AND WHEREAS Owner acknowledges that the Company would refrain from issuing said Policy without showing said General Exceptions in the absence of the representations, agreements and undertakings contained herein.
Nothing contained herein shall be construed so as to obligate the Company to issue said Policy without showing
said General Exceptions. However, should the Company do so, it will do so in part in reliance upon the undertakings of the undersigned Owner. The issuance of the Policy shall be the consideration for the undertakings contained herein.
AFFIDAVIT
NOW THEREFORE, Owner certifies that:
1. Said Land is owned by Owner, and the ownership thereof has been peaceable and undisturbed.
2. Unless otherwise stated, Owner has not (a) entered into any oral or written leases, tenancies or other occupancies with commercial tenants; or (b) entered into any oral or written leases with residential tenants with a rental period of longer than 12 months.
__________________________________________________________________
Please attach copies of any written commercial leases or agreements.
Please attach copies of any written residential leases or agreements with a period in excess of 12 months
3. Unless otherwise stated, Owner has granted no rights of first refusal or options to purchase all or any portion of said land contained within any leases or other documents.
__________________________________________________________________
Please attach copies of any written agreements
4. Unless otherwise stated, Owner has not entered into any contracts for the making of repairs or for new construction on said Land or for the services of architects, engineers or surveyors, nor are there any unpaid bills or claims for labor or services performed or material furnished or delivered during the last six (6)
Item 8.4
Packet pg. 164/524
Item 8.4
Packet pg. 164/524
months at Owner’s request for alterations, repair work or new construction on said Land, including site preparation, soil tests, site surveys, demolition, etc.
__________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________.
Please contact your title officer for further requirements related to repairs or construction
5. Neither Owner nor any principal of Owner has filed a petition for bankruptcy, which action is pending, nor
is Owner a party to any pending action, nor has Owner been served with a summons and complaint nor
received any notice of any action which is pending against Owner.
6. There are no outstanding service, installation, connection, tap, capacity or construction charges for sewer, water, electricity, natural gas or other utilities, or garbage collection and disposal. Any such charges which may arise prior to the effective date of the Policy of Policies will be paid in full by Owner.
7. There are no unpaid special assessments for sewer, water, road or other local improvement districts, or
taxes, except as shown in said Commitment for Title Insurance.
8. Owner has received no notice and has no knowledge of any proceedings which would result in an assessment against the Land.
9. Owner agrees that between the most recent Effective Date of the Commitment and the date of recording of
the documents insured under the Policy, but in no even later than 20 days from the date of this affidavit or
20 days from the closing of escrow, whichever is later, the Owner or its principal members have not taken or allowed, and will not take or allow, any action or inaction to encumber or otherwise affect title to the Land
Owner hereby agrees to indemnify, protect, defend and save harmless the Company at Owner’s own costs and
charges from and against loss suffered by it (including reasonable attorneys fees) under said Policy (but without
prejudice to the right of the Company to defend at the expense of Owner if it so elects) arising out of the failure of any of Owner’s statements set forth above to be true and correct when made.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this agreement this ______ day of
________________________, 20______.
________________________________________________ ________________________________________________
STATE OF ____________________)
ss.
COUNTY OF __________________)
I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that _____________________________ is the person who appeared before me, and said
person acknowledged that he/she signed this instrument, on oath stated that he/she was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as
the _________________________________ of ___________________________________________ to be the free and voluntary act of such party for
the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument.
Dated: _________________________ ______________________________________ Notary Public Printed Name: __________________________
Residing at: ____________________________
My appointment expires: __________________
Item 8.4
Packet pg. 165/524
Item 8.4
Packet pg. 165/524
1
When Recorded Return To: The Washington State Department of Commerce Local Government Division 1500 Jefferson St. SE Olympia, Washington 98501 Early Learning Facilities Attention: Real Estate Development and Services ____________________________________________________________________________________________ LEASEHOLD DEED OF TRUST Lessee (Grantor): Boys and Girls Clubs of Snohomish County Lessor: City of Edmonds Beneficiary (Beneficiary): Department of Commerce, Community Capital Facilities Grantee (Trustee): Chicago Title Company Legal Description (abbreviated): PTN LOTS 1-4, BLK 100, PLAT OF CITY OF EDMONDS; AND PTN VACATED ALLEY AND STREETS Assessor’s Tax Parcel ID#: 004342-100-000-00 IOP Grant Number: 24-96656-504 THIS LEASEHOLD DEED OF TRUST (hereinafter called “Deed of Trust”) is made this 17th day of August, 2026, between Boys and Girls Clubs of Snohomish County, a Washington Nonprofit Corporation, whose mailing address is 8223 Broadway, Suite 100 Everett, WA 98203, as grantor under this Deed of Trust and lessee under the lease described below ("Lessee"); Chicago Title Company, whose mailing address is 3002 Colby Ave., Suite 200, Everett, Washington, 98201, as Trustee ("Trustee"); and the Washington State Department of Commerce, Community Capital Facilities Unit or its successor agency, as Beneficiary ("Beneficiary"), whose address is 1500 Jefferson St. SE, Olympia, Washington 98501. 1. Grant. Lessee hereby irrevocably grants, bargains, conveys, and assigns to Trustee in trust, with right of entry and possession as provided for herein, for the benefit of Beneficiary, all of Lessee’s interest in the following described property in Snohomish County, Washington: That certain leasehold estate (hereinafter called "leasehold estate"), together with and including all right, title and interest of Lessee therein, which said leasehold estate embraces and covers a portion of the real property hereinafter described, situated, lying in the City of Edmonds, County of Snohomish, State of Washington, and is more particularly described as: The leasehold estate created by that certain Lease (hereinafter called "Lease") dated February 2, 2023, executed by and between City of Edmonds, a Washington Municipal Corporation, as Lessor (“Lessor”), and Boys & Girls of Clubs of Snohomish County, a Washington nonprofit corporation , as Lessee, pursuant to which a memorandum of lease was recorded on January 13, 2026 under instrument number 202601130103, and covers the following described property: A PORTION OF LOTS 1 THROUGH 4, BLOCK 100, PLAT OF CITY OF EDMONDS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 2 OF PLATS, PAGE
Item 8.4
Packet pg. 166/524
Item 8.4
Packet pg. 166/524
2
39; AND A PORTION OF SPRAGUE STREET AND THAT UNNAMED ALLEY WITHIN BLOCK 100 OF SAID PLAT, BOTH AS VACATED BY CITY OF EDMONDS ORDINANCE NO. 4028 RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 201606230342, RECORDS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENClNG AT THE INTERSECTION OF SPRAGUE STREET AND 6TH AVENUE NORTH; THENCE SOUTH 01°14'42" WEST, ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF SAID 6TH AVENUE NORTH, 31.3 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89°23'16" EAST, 36.09 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION OF THE BACK OF A CONCRETE SIDEWALK AND THE NORTHERLY CONCRETE EDGE OF A PLANTING STRIP, AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 89°23'16" EAST. ALONG SAID NORTHERLY CONCRETE EDGE, 11.02 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION OF SAID CONCRETE EDGE WITH A SEAM IN THE TOE OF A CONCRETE WALL; THENCE NORTH 00°36'44'' EAST ALONG SAID SEAM, 2.03 FEET TO AN ANGLE POINT IN SAID SEAM AND WALL; THENCE SOUTH 88°41'54'' EAST, CONTINUING ALONG SAID SEAM AND ITS EXTENSION, 92.89 FEET TO A POINT 0.62 FEET WESTERLY OF AN ANGLE POINT IN SAID SEAM; THENCE SOUTH 01°17"03" WEST ALONG THE EASTERLY EDGE OF A CONCRETE CURB AND ITS EXTENSION, 116.14 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY EDGE OF SAID CONCRETE CURB; THENCE NORTH 88°42'22" WEST 104.08 FEET TO INTERSECT THE BACK OF A CONCRETE SIDEWALK: THENCE NORTH 01°23'10" EAST, 114.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH, STATE OF WASHINGTON.
TOGETHER WITH all right, title and interest of Lessee in and to all options to purchase, options of first refusal and renewal options with respect to the Lease or said property or any portion thereof or any interest therein and in and to any
greater estate in said property (including the fee simple estate) as may be subsequently acquired by or release to Lessee.
TOGETHER WITH all interest, estate, or other claims, both in law or equity, which Lessee now has or may hereafter acquire in said property.
1.1. The Lease shall not be materially modified or changed in any way without the written consent of
Beneficiary. Amendments to the Lease extending the term, renewing the Lease, increasing or decreasing the amount of space leased under the Lease by up to 100 square feet, or allowing improvements to the space shall not be considered
material modifications requiring written consent of the Beneficiary.
1.2. Beneficiary shall be immediately furnished with all Notices of Default served by Lessor of the Lease on Lessee.
1.3. In the event Lessee shall fail to make payment due on the Lease or to perform any term or covenant as
provided therein, in addition to any such default constituting a default under this Deed of Trust, Beneficiary may, at its option, make the defaulted payments or perform the term or covenant and add the same to the amount due under this Deed of Trust without waiving any of its rights under this Deed of Trust and the Note which it secures.
Item 8.4
Packet pg. 167/524
Item 8.4
Packet pg. 167/524
3
1.4. If both the Lessor's and the Lessee's estate under the Lease shall at any time become vested in one owner, this Deed of Trust and the lien created hereby shall not be destroyed or terminated by the application of the doctrine of merger, and in such event, Beneficiary shall continue to have and to enjoy all of the rights, title, interest and privileges of Beneficiary as to the separate estates. In addition, foreclosure of said property shall not destroy or terminate the Lease by application of the doctrine of merger or as a matter of law or as a result of foreclosure unless Beneficiary or any purchaser at foreclosure sale shall so elect. In the event that Lessee shall, at any time prior to the payment in full of
all indebtedness secured by this Deed of Trust, acquire fee simple title to said property, such fee simple title shall not merge with the leasehold estate encumbered by this Deed of Trust, but such fee simple title shall immediately, without further action on the part of the Lessee, become subject to the lien hereof. In the event of such acquisition by Lessee, Lessee agrees to execute and deliver to Beneficiary such further instruments, conveyances and assurances as Beneficiary
may reasonably require in order to further confirm and assure that the fee simple title so acquired by Grantor is subject to the terms, provisions and lien of this Deed of trust. The provisions of this paragraph shall not apply in the event
Beneficiary acquires the fee of said property, except if Beneficiary shall so elect. Said property is not used for agricultural or farming purposes. 2. Obligations Secured. This deed is given for the purpose of securing payment in the amount of Two Million and 00/100 dollars ($2,000,000.00) payable by the Lessee to the Beneficiary evidenced by a Promissory Note between and the Washington State Department of Commerce, of even date herewith, and Contract Number 24-96656-504 between and Washington State Department of Commerce, as now or hereafter amended (“Contract”), and securing performance of each term and condition of said Contract and Promissory Note, together with all future advances. 3. Protection of Security. To protect the security of this Deed of Trust, Lessee covenants and agrees: 3.1. To keep the leased property in good condition and repair; to permit no waste thereof; to diligently
pursue or complete any building, structure or improvement thereon which may be damaged or destroyed to the extent required by the Lease or Contract; and to comply with all laws, ordinances, conditions and restrictions affecting the property. 3.2. To keep its leasehold interest in the property free and clear of all other charges, liens, or encumbrances impairing the security of this Deed of Trust.
3.3. To maintain a policy of property insurance for the leased property covering its supplies, inventory, personal property, equipment, fixtures as well as all improvements, additions, and modifications to or in the leased property, in an amount not less than the replacement cost thereof. Except as otherwise provided herein and in the Contract
the amount collected under any insurance policy may be applied upon any indebtedness hereby secured in such order, as the Beneficiary shall determine, subject to the rights of any senior lien-holder.
3.4. To defend any action or proceeding purporting to affect the security hereof or the rights or powers of Beneficiary or Trustee, and to pay all costs and expenses, including cost of title search and attorney's fees in a reasonable amount, in any such proceeding, and in any suit brought by Beneficiary to foreclose this Deed of Trust.
3.5. To pay all costs, fees and expenses in connection with this Deed of Trust, including the expenses of the Trustee incurred in enforcing the obligations secured hereby and Trustee's and attorney's fees actually incurred, as provided by statute.
3.6. Should Lessee fail to pay when due any taxes, assessments, insurance premiums, liens, encumbrances
or other charges against its leasehold interest in the property when the same become due and payable, Beneficiary may, but shall not be obligated, to pay the same, and the amount so paid shall be added to and become a part of the debt secured by this Deed of Trust.
Item 8.4
Packet pg. 168/524
Item 8.4
Packet pg. 168/524
4
4. General Conditions. The parties hereto agree that: 4.1 In the event of any fire or other casualty to the leased property or eminent domain proceedings resulting in condemnation of the leased property or any part thereof, and with Beneficiary’s approval which shall not be unreasonably withheld, Lessee shall either (a) repair the premises subject to the leasehold estate and continue the tenancy if permitted under the lease, or (b) use all available insurance or condemnation proceeds to continue providing the public
benefit contemplated under the Contract in a different location. In such an instance, insurance and/or condemnation proceeds must be used in a manner that provides adequate security to the Beneficiary for repayment of the remaining balance of the loan and performance of Lessee’s obligations under the Contract. 4.2. By accepting payment of any sum secured hereby after its due date, Beneficiary does not waive its right to require prompt payment when due of all other sums so secured or to declare default for failure to so pay.
4.3. The Trustee shall reconvey all or any part of the property covered by this Deed of Trust to the person entitled thereto on written request of the Lessee and the Beneficiary, or upon satisfaction of the obligations secured and written request for reconveyance made by the Beneficiary or the person entitled thereto.
4.4. Default Remedies. Upon default by Lessee of its obligations secured hereby without timely cure and
after written notice of thirty (30) days, all sums secured hereby shall immediately become due and payable. In such event and upon written notice of Beneficiary, Lessee’s leasehold interest in the property may be automatically assigned to Trustee for the benefit of Beneficiary and Lessee agrees that Trustee may take any action on behalf of the Lessee for the benefit of the Beneficiary (with right of entry onto the leased premises) to keep, observe, or perform an such terms,
covenants, provisions, or agreements and to enter into the leased premises (after reasonable advance notice to Lessee) and take all such action thereon as may be reasonably necessary therefore, with all rights to use, assign, or sublet the
leasehold premises allowed under the terms of the then-current Lease.
4.5. Beneficiary may at any time appoint or discharge the Trustee.
4.6. This Deed of Trust applies to, inures to the benefit of, and binds all parties hereto and their successors and assigns. The terms "Lessee," “Lessor,” "Trustee," and "Beneficiary" include their successors and assigns.
5. Acceleration. Except as otherwise provided for in the Contract, if without Beneficiary's prior written consent, all or any part of Lessee’s interest in the property is assigned, conveyed, transferred, encumbered, or the leased property is not used as required by the Contract between Beneficiary and Lessee, Beneficiary may, at its option, require immediate payment in full of all sums secured by this Deed of Trust. However, this option shall not be exercised by Beneficiary if exercise is prohibited by federal law as of the date of this Deed of Trust. If Beneficiary exercises this
option, Beneficiary shall give Lessee notice of acceleration. The notice shall provide a period of not less than thirty (30) days from the date the notice is delivered or mailed within which Lessee must pay all sums secured by this Deed of Trust. If Lessee fails to pay these sums prior to the expiration of this period, Beneficiary may invoke any remedies permitted by this Deed of Trust without further notice or demand on Lessee. [SIGNATURE AND NOTARY PAGES FOLLOW]
Item 8.4
Packet pg. 169/524
Item 8.4
Packet pg. 169/524
5
IN WITNESS HEREOF , Boys and Girls Clubs of Snohomish County has executed this Deed of Trust on the ___ day of _________________, 20__. Boys and Girls Clubs of Snohomish County, a Washington Nonprofit Corporation
By:
Printed Name: Title:
STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss. COUNTY OF ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that _____________________ is the person who appeared
before me, and said person acknowledged that they signed this instrument, on oath stated that they were authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the ______________ of Boys and Girls Clubs of Snohomish County, a Washington Nonprofit Corporation, to be the free and voluntary act and deed of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument.
DATED:______________________________________
(Seal or Stamp) (Signature of Notary) (Legibly Print or Stamp Name of Notary)
NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the state of Washington My Commission Expires:
Item 8.4
Packet pg. 170/524
Item 8.4
Packet pg. 170/524
6
CONSENTED TO BY LESSOR: City of Edmonds, a Washington Municipal Corporation
By:
Printed Name:
Title:
STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss. COUNTY OF __________ ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that _____________________ is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that they signed this instrument, on oath stated that they were authorized to
execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the ______________ of City of Edmonds a Washington Municipal Corporation, to be the free and voluntary act and deed of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. DATED:______________________________________
(Seal or Stamp)
(Signature of Notary) (Legibly Print or Stamp Name of Notary) NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the state of Washington
My Commission Expires:
Item 8.4
Packet pg. 171/524
Item 8.4
Packet pg. 171/524
7
REQUEST FOR FULL RECONVEYANCE TO BE USED ONLY WHEN ALL OBLIGATIONS HAVE BEEN PAID AND ALL DUTIES PERFORMED UNDER THIS DEED OF TRUST.
TO: TRUSTEE: The undersigned as the party entitled to the performance, benefits, duties, and payments under Contract 24-96656-504 between Grantor and Beneficiary, which is secured by this Deed of Trust and other legal documents.
The obligations thus secured have been fully paid, duties performed and satisfied, and you are hereby requested and directed, on payment to you of any sums owing to you under the terms of said Deed of Trust, including Contingent Interest, to cancel evidence of indebtedness secured by said Deed of Trust delivered to you with said Deed of Trust,
and to reconvey, without warranty, to the parties designated by the terms of said Deed of Trust, all the estate now held by you hereunder.
_____________________________________ Dated
_____________________________________
Name
_____________________________________ Title
Item 8.4
Packet pg. 172/524
Item 8.4
Packet pg. 172/524
DocuSign Envelope ID: 2A607031-DFF8-48B5-AAC7-B8FCF4327E89
Item 8.4
Packet pg. 173/524
Item 8.4
Packet pg. 173/524
DocuSign Envelope ID: 2A607031-DFF8-48B5-AAC7-B8FCF4327E89
Item 8.4
Packet pg. 174/524
Item 8.4
Packet pg. 174/524
DocuSign Envelope ID: 2A607031-DFF8-48B5-AAC7-B8FCF4327E89
Item 8.4
Packet pg. 175/524
Item 8.4
Packet pg. 175/524
2nd February
DocuSign Envelope ID: 2A607031-DFF8-48B5-AAC7-B8FCF4327E89
Item 8.4
Packet pg. 176/524
Item 8.4
Packet pg. 176/524
DocuSign Envelope ID: 2A607031-DFF8-48B5-AAC7-B8FCF4327E89
Item 8.4
Packet pg. 177/524
Item 8.4
Packet pg. 177/524
DocuSign Envelope ID: 2A607031-DFF8-48B5-AAC7-B8FCF4327E89
Item 8.4
Packet pg. 178/524
Item 8.4
Packet pg. 178/524
DocuSign Envelope ID: 2A607031-DFF8-48B5-AAC7-B8FCF4327E89
Item 8.4
Packet pg. 179/524
Item 8.4
Packet pg. 179/524
DocuSign Envelope ID: 2A607031-DFF8-48B5-AAC7-B8FCF4327E89
Item 8.4
Packet pg. 180/524
Item 8.4
Packet pg. 180/524
DocuSign Envelope ID: 2A607031-DFF8-48B5-AAC7-B8FCF4327E89
Item 8.4
Packet pg. 181/524
Item 8.4
Packet pg. 181/524
DocuSign Envelope ID: 2A607031-DFF8-48B5-AAC7-B8FCF4327E89
Item 8.4
Packet pg. 182/524
Item 8.4
Packet pg. 182/524
DocuSign Envelope ID: 2A607031-DFF8-48B5-AAC7-B8FCF4327E89
Item 8.4
Packet pg. 183/524
Item 8.4
Packet pg. 183/524
DocuSign Envelope ID: 2A607031-DFF8-48B5-AAC7-B8FCF4327E89
Item 8.4
Packet pg. 184/524
Item 8.4
Packet pg. 184/524
DocuSign Envelope ID: 2A607031-DFF8-48B5-AAC7-B8FCF4327E89
Item 8.4
Packet pg. 185/524
Item 8.4
Packet pg. 185/524
DocuSign Envelope ID: 2A607031-DFF8-48B5-AAC7-B8FCF4327E89
Item 8.4
Packet pg. 186/524
Item 8.4
Packet pg. 186/524
DocuSign Envelope ID: 2A607031-DFF8-48B5-AAC7-B8FCF4327E89
Item 8.4
Packet pg. 187/524
Item 8.4
Packet pg. 187/524
DocuSign Envelope ID: 2A607031-DFF8-48B5-AAC7-B8FCF4327E89
February 21, 2023
/ƚĞŵϴ͘ϰ
WĂĐŬĞƚƉŐ͘ϭϴϴͬϱϮϰ
/ƚĞŵϴ͘ϰ
WĂĐŬĞƚƉŐ͘ϭϴϴͬϱϮϰ
DocuSign Envelope ID: 2A607031-DFF8-48B5-AAC7-B8FCF4327E89
Item 8.4
Packet pg. 189/524
Item 8.4
Packet pg. 189/524
DocuSign Envelope ID: 2A607031-DFF8-48B5-AAC7-B8FCF4327E89
Item 8.4
Packet pg. 190/524
Item 8.4
Packet pg. 190/524
DocuSign Envelope ID: 2A607031-DFF8-48B5-AAC7-B8FCF4327E89
Item 8.4
Packet pg. 191/524
Item 8.4
Packet pg. 191/524
DocuSign Envelope ID: 2A607031-DFF8-48B5-AAC7-B8FCF4327E89
Item 8.4
Packet pg. 192/524
Item 8.4
Packet pg. 192/524
DocuSign Envelope ID: 2A607031-DFF8-48B5-AAC7-B8FCF4327E89
Item 8.4
Packet pg. 193/524
Item 8.4
Packet pg. 193/524
DocuSign Envelope ID: 2A607031-DFF8-48B5-AAC7-B8FCF4327E89
Item 8.4
Packet pg. 194/524
Item 8.4
Packet pg. 194/524
DocuSign Envelope ID: 2A607031-DFF8-48B5-AAC7-B8FCF4327E89
Item 8.4
Packet pg. 195/524
Item 8.4
Packet pg. 195/524
DocuSign Envelope ID: 2A607031-DFF8-48B5-AAC7-B8FCF4327E89
Item 8.4
Packet pg. 196/524
Item 8.4
Packet pg. 196/524
DocuSign Envelope ID: 2A607031-DFF8-48B5-AAC7-B8FCF4327E89
Item 8.4
Packet pg. 197/524
Item 8.4
Packet pg. 197/524
DocuSign Envelope ID: 2A607031-DFF8-48B5-AAC7-B8FCF4327E89
Item 8.4
Packet pg. 198/524
Item 8.4
Packet pg. 198/524
Has the original City contract boilerplate language been modified? Yes No
If yes, specify which sections have been modified:
Description
of Services:
Type of Contract: (GR) Grants (I) Intergovernmental Agreement (L) Lease Agreement
Bid/RFP Number:
(S) Purchase of Services (W) Public Works (O) Other
Effective Date: Completion Date:
Originator: Routed by:
Department/Division: Date:
Name of Consultant/Contractor:
CONTRACT TITLE:
Total Amount of Contract:
Budget # Amount: Budget # Amount:
Budget # Amount: Budget # Amount:
Budget # Amount: Budget # Amount:
Are there sufficient funds in the current budget to cover this contract? Yes No
Remarks:
Authorization Level:
Project Manager
Risk Management/Budget
City Attorney
Consultant/Contractor
Other
City Council Approval Date (if applicable)
Mayor
City Clerk
SI
G
N
A
T
U
R
E
FI
N
A
N
C
I
A
L
DE
T
A
I
L
S
CO
N
T
R
A
C
T
CO
N
T
E
N
T
DE
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
CONTRACT ROUTING FORM
No.
(City Clerk Use Only)
Angie Feser Carrie Haslam,,, P&&&R
Parks &&& Recreation 000222///222333///222000222333
Boys and Girls Clubs of Snohomish County
Ground Lease
Lease of property
$$$ 44000000...000000
ྜ
000111///000111///222000222333
ྜ ྜ
ྜ
Mayor
111222///333111///2220006222
DocuSign Envelope ID: 2A607031-DFF8-48B5-AAC7-B8FCF4327E89
Item 8.4
Packet pg. 199/524
Item 8.4
Packet pg. 199/524
1
0
7
0
Agenda Item 8.5
Edmonds City Council
Regular Meeting
October 27, 2026
TITLE:Waterfront Buoy Permit Contract Amendment #1 (Second
Reading)
DEPARTMENT:Parks and Recreation
PRESENTER:Angie Feser, Director
NEEDED FROM COUNCIL:Action
RECOMMENDATION:The City Council to authorize the Mayor to amend the City of
Edmonds and Herrera Waterfront Buoy Installation professional
services agreement to expand the scope of work, increase
contract amount to a total amount of $82,847 as proposed in
attached contract and increase the Parks & Recreation budget
authority in Fund 125 for an additional $23,957 for this project.
BUDGET:
Total Dollar Amount:$23,957 ☐ Approved in Budget
Fund(s):Fund 125 (REET)☒ Budget Reallocation Required
☐ No Budget Impact
PROBLEM/ISSUE STATEMENT:
To meet US Coast Guard requirements, the City needs to install six new safety buoys along the
Edmonds waterfront: four in Brackett’s Landing Dive Park, one in South Brackett’s Landing area,
and one for the Olympic Beach swimming pier.
The permitting and leasing process is complex, involving state and federal agencies, so the City
contracted with Herrera Engineering to assist. The original agreement and scope of work
(attached) was for $58,890. A new requirement from the State of Washington Department of
Natural Resources now requires surveys of leased areas. This is an additional service and
requires an amendment to the professional services agreement with Herrera and an adjusted
contract budget. The new scope of work adds $23,957 to the existing contract of $58,890 for a
total of $82,847.
This agenda item is requesting additional budget allocation of $23,957 for the Waterfront Buoy
installation project.
CONTEXT, ANALYSIS, & ALTERNATIVES:
Alternatives –
1. Not approve the additional budget allocation of $23,957 for the Waterfront Buoy installation
Item 8.5
Packet pg. 200/524
Item 8.5
Packet pg. 200/524
1
0
7
0
project which will not allow the city to meet the permitting requirements of State of
Washington Department of Natural Resources, halting the buoy installation project and unable
to comply with US Coast Guard water safety requirements.
2. Amend the scope of work and budget allocation amount.
RECOMMENDATION:
The City Council to authorize the Mayor to amend the City of Edmonds and Herrera Waterfront
Buoy Installation professional services agreement to expand the scope of work, increase
contract amount to a total amount of $82,847 as proposed in attached contract and increase
the Parks & Recreation budget authority in Fund 125 for an additional $23,957 for this project.
BUDGET IMPACTS:
Additional budget allocation of $23,957 from Fund 125 which has sufficient funding. (REET:
125.00.64.576.5768040.000.541000)
ITEM HISTORY:
July 15, 2025: Council Committee B Meeting: Waterfront Buoys Installation Project Briefing
July 22, 2025: Regular Council Meeting, Received for Filing: Waterfront Buoys Installation
Project Briefing
October 20, 2026: Parks & Public Works Committee Meeting, First Reading of this agenda item
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
ATTACHMENTS:
Professional Services Agreement: Edmonds-Herrera Buoy PSA - Amendment #1
Item 8.5
Packet pg. 201/524
Item 8.5
Packet pg. 201/524
CITY OF EDMONDS
121 5TH AVENUE NORTH · EDMONDS, WA 98020 · 425-771-0220 · FAX 425-672-5750 Website: www.edmondswa.gov
MIKE ROSEN
MAYOR
1
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) is made and entered into between the City of Edmonds, hereinafter referred to as the “City,” and Herrera Environmental Consultants, Inc., hereinafter referred to as the “Consultant.”
WHEREAS, the City desires to engage the professional services and assistance of a consulting firm to provide permitting, design, and oversight services for the installation of six marker safety buoys on the Edmonds waterfront; and
WHEREAS, the Consultant has the necessary skills and experience, and desires to provide such services to the City; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual benefits accruing, it is agreed by and between the parties hereto as follows:
1. Scope of work. The scope of work shall include all services and material necessary to accomplish the above mentioned objectives in accordance with the Scope of Work that is marked as Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
2. Payments. The Consultant shall be paid by the City for completed work for services rendered under this Agreement as provided hereinafter. Such payment shall be full compensation for work performed or services rendered and for all labor, materials, supplies, equipment and incidentals necessary to complete the work.
A. Payment for work accomplished under the terms of this Agreement shall be on a time and expense basis as set forth in Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference; provided, in no event shall the payment for work performed pursuant to this Agreement exceed the sum of FIFTY-EIGHT THOUSAND EIGHT HUNDRED NINETY DOLLARS
($58,890.00). The Consultant certifies that it is providing the City with the lowest price offered as
compared to similarly situated clients, terms and conditions. B. All vouchers shall be submitted by the Consultant to the City for payment pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. The City shall pay the appropriate amount for each
voucher to the Consultant. The Consultant may submit vouchers to the City monthly during the progress of the work for payment of completed phases of the project. Billings shall be reviewed in conjunction with the City’s warrant process. No billing shall be considered for payment that has not been submitted to the City three (3) days prior to the scheduled cut-off date. Such late vouchers
will be checked by the City and payment will be made in the next regular payment cycle.
Docusign Envelope ID: A54763BE-371A-4E8C-8F7A-16F431997D21
Item 8.5
Packet pg. 202/524
Item 8.5
Packet pg. 202/524
C. The costs records and accounts pertaining to this Agreement are to be kept available for inspection by representatives of the City for a period of three (3) years after final payment. Copies shall be made available upon request.
3. Ownership and use of documents. All research, tests, surveys, preliminary data,
reports, and any and all other work product prepared or gathered by the Consultant in preparation for the services rendered by the Consultant under this Agreement shall be and are the property of the Consultant, provided, however, that: A. All final reports, presentations, documentation and testimony prepared by
the Consultant shall become the property of the City upon their presentation to and acceptance by the City and shall at that date become the property of the City. B. The City shall have the right, upon reasonable request, to inspect, review
and copy any work product during normal office hours. Documents prepared under this Agreement
and in the possession of the Consultant may be subject to public records request and release under Chapter 42.56 RCW. C. In the event that the Consultant shall default on this Agreement, or in the event that this Agreement shall be terminated prior to its completion as herein provided, the work
product of the Consultant, along with a summary of work done to date of default or termination, shall become the property of the City and tender of the work product and summary shall be a prerequisite to final payment under this Agreement. The summary of work done shall be prepared at no additional cost.
4. Time of performance. The Consultant shall perform the work authorized by this Agreement promptly in accordance with the receipt of the required governmental approvals. 5. Indemnification / Hold harmless agreement. The Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers harmless from any
and all claims, injuries, damages, losses, demands, or suits at law or equity arising from the acts, errors or omissions of the Consultant in the performance of this Agreement, except for injuries and damages caused by the sole negligence of the City. Should a court of competent jurisdiction determine that this Agreement is subject to RCW 4.24.115, then, in the event of liability for
damages arising out of bodily injury to persons or damages to property caused by or resulting from
the concurrent negligence of the Consultant and the City, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers, the Consultant’s liability, including the duty and cost to defend, hereunder shall be only to the extent of the Consultant’s negligence.
The Consultant shall comply with all applicable sections of the applicable Ethics laws, including RCW 42.23, which is the Code of Ethics for regulating contract interest by municipal officers. The
Consultant specifically assumes potential liability for actions brought by the Consultant’s own employees against the City and, solely for the purpose of this indemnification and defense, the Consultant specifically waives any immunity under the state industrial insurance law, Title 51 RCW. This waiver has been mutually negotiated by the parties. The provisions of this section shall
survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement.
Docusign Envelope ID: A54763BE-371A-4E8C-8F7A-16F431997D21
Item 8.5
Packet pg. 203/524
Item 8.5
Packet pg. 203/524
6. General and professional liability insurance. The Consultant shall obtain and keep in force during the term of this Agreement, or as otherwise required, the following insurance with companies or through sources approved by the State Insurance Commissioner pursuant to Title 48 RCW.
Insurance Coverage
A. Worker’s compensation and employer’s liability insurance as required by the State.
B. Commercial general liability and property damage insurance in an aggregate amount not less than two million dollars ($2,000,000) for bodily injury, including death and property damage. The per occurrence amount shall be written with limits no less than one million dollars ($1,000,000).
C. Vehicle liability insurance for any automobile used in an amount not less than a one million
dollar ($1,000,000) combined single limit.
D. Professional liability insurance in the amount of one million dollars ($1,000,000).
Excepting the Worker’s Compensation Insurance and Professional Liability Insurance secured by
the Consultant, the City will be named on all policies as an additional insured. The Consultant
shall furnish the City with verification of insurance and endorsements required by the Agreement. The City reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies at any time.
All insurance shall be obtained from an insurance company authorized to do business in the State of Washington. The Consultant shall submit a verification of insurance as outlined above within
fourteen days of the execution of this Agreement to the City.
No cancellation of the foregoing policies shall be effective without thirty (30) days prior notice to the City.
The Consultant’s professional liability to the City shall be limited to the amount payable under this
Agreement or one million dollars ($1,000,000), whichever is the greater, unless modified
elsewhere in this Agreement. In no case shall the Consultant’s professional liability to third parties
be limited in any way.
7. Discrimination prohibited. The Consultant shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, national origin, age, sex, sexual orientation, marital status, veteran status, liability for service in the armed forces of the
United States, disability, or the presence of any sensory, mental or physical handicap, or any other protected class status, unless based upon a bona fide occupational qualification. 8. Consultant is an independent contractor. The parties intend that an independent
contractor relationship will be created by this Agreement. No agent, employee or representative of
the Consultant shall be deemed to be an agent, employee or representative of the City for any purpose. The Consultant shall be solely responsible for all acts of its agents, employees, representatives and subcontractors during the performance of this Agreement. 9. City approval of work and relationships. Notwithstanding the Consultant’s
status as an independent contractor, results of the work performed pursuant to this Agreement must meet the approval of the City. During pendency of this Agreement, the Consultant shall not perform work for any party with respect to any property located within the City of Edmonds or for any project subject to the administrative or quasijudicial review of the City without written
notification to the City and the City’s prior written consent.
Docusign Envelope ID: A54763BE-371A-4E8C-8F7A-16F431997D21
Item 8.5
Packet pg. 204/524
Item 8.5
Packet pg. 204/524
10. Termination. This being an Agreement for professional services, either party may terminate this Agreement for any reason upon giving the other party written notice of such termination no fewer than ten (10) days in advance of the effective date of said termination. Payment under this Agreement is subject to the appropriation of funds for these purposes. In the
event funds are not appropriated, the City reserves the right to terminate this Agreement effective
immediately and shall provide the Consultant with written notice of immediate termination. 11. Integration. The Agreement between the parties shall consist of this document and the Scope of Work and fee schedule attached hereto as Exhibits A and B. These writings constitute the entire Agreement of the parties and shall not be amended except by a writing
executed by both parties. In the event of any conflict between this written Agreement and any provision of Exhibits A or B, this Agreement shall control. 12. Changes/Additional Work. The City may engage the Consultant to perform
services in addition to those listed in this Agreement, and the Consultant will be entitled to
additional compensation for authorized additional services or materials. The City shall not be liable for additional compensation until and unless any and all additional work and compensation is approved in advance in writing and signed by both parties to this Agreement. If conditions are encountered which are not anticipated in the Scope of Work, the City understands that a revision to the Scope of Work and fees may be required. Provided, however, that nothing in this paragraph
shall be interpreted to obligate the Consultant to render services, or the City to pay for services rendered, in excess of the Scope of Work in Exhibit A unless or until an amendment to this Agreement is approved in writing by both parties.
13. Standard of Care. The Consultant represents that the Consultant has the
necessary knowledge, skill and experience to perform services required by this Agreement. The Consultant and any persons employed by the Consultant shall use their best efforts to perform the work in a professional manner consistent with sound practices, in accordance with the schedules herein and in accordance with the usual and customary professional care required for services of the type described in the Scope of Work.
14. Non-waiver. Waiver by the City of any provision of this Agreement or any time limitation provided for in this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other provision.
15. Non-assignable. The services to be provided by the Consultant shall not be
assigned or subcontracted without the express written consent of the City. 16. Covenant against contingent fees. The Consultant warrants that he/she/they has/have not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for the Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement, and that he/she/they
has/have not paid or agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for the Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gifts, or any other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award of making of this Agreement. For breach or violation of this warranty, the City shall have the right to annul this Agreement without
liability or, in its discretion to deduct from the contract price or consideration, or otherwise recover,
the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift, or contingent fee.
Docusign Envelope ID: A54763BE-371A-4E8C-8F7A-16F431997D21
Item 8.5
Packet pg. 205/524
Item 8.5
Packet pg. 205/524
17. Compliance with laws. The Consultant in the performance of this Agreement shall comply with all applicable Federal, State or local laws and ordinances, including regulations for licensing, certification and operation of facilities, programs and accreditation, and licensing of individuals, and any other standards or criteria as described in the Agreement to assure quality of
services.
The Consultant specifically agrees to pay any applicable business and occupation (B & O) taxes which may be due on account of this Agreement. 18. Notices. Notices to the City of Edmonds shall be sent to the following address: City of Edmonds 121 Fifth Avenue N Edmonds, WA 98020
Notices to the Consultant shall be sent to the following address:
Herrera Environmental Consultants, Inc. 2200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 1100 Seattle, WA 98121
Receipt of any notice shall be deemed effective three (3) days after deposit of written notice in the U.S. mails, with proper postage and properly addressed.
DATED THIS _____ day of _______________ 2025. CITY OF EDMONDS HERRERA ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, INC.
By Mike Rosen, Mayor Its __________________________________
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: ________________________________ Scott Passey, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM:
________________________________ Office of the City Attorney
Vice President
Docusign Envelope ID: A54763BE-371A-4E8C-8F7A-16F431997D21
Item 8.5
Packet pg. 206/524
Item 8.5
Packet pg. 206/524
SCOPE OF WORK
Page 1 of 3
EDMONDS MARKER BUOY SUPPORT
On July 16, 2025, Angie Feser of the City of Edmonds (the City) requested Herrera Environmental
Consultants, Inc. (Herrera) prepare a scope of work (SOW) to assist the City in permitting, design,
oversight of installation of six marker buoys; four to demark the Edmonds Underwater Park (the
Underwater Park) and; one off of South Brackett’s Landing both of those areas being near the Edmonds
Ferry Terminal and one more buoy adjacent to the Olympic Beach Fishing Pier in Edmonds, Washington.
The City was recently contacted by the U.S. Coast Guard to better demarcate the Edmonds Underwater
Park, the Olympic Beach Fishing Pier and South Brackett’s Landing. As a result, the City purchased six
marker buoys (no tethers or anchors). The City would like to install the buoys but requires assistance with
the design, permitting, and support in contracting installation of the purchased buoys and recommended
anchoring system.
Task 1 – Project Management
Herrera’s project manager, Jeff Parsons, will be responsible for ongoing administration of the project,
including preparing invoices and progress reports, as well as coordinating work efforts with the City. Time
on this project includes a virtual team kickoff meeting, regular internal check-in meetings, developing the
project schedule, and project initiation. Herrera’s project manager will have phone and email contact with
the City on an as-needed basis.
Deliverables:
•Monthly progress reports and invoices.
Task 2 – Engineering Design
Herrera will develop engineering design drawings and specifications for buoy attachment and anchoring
necessary to necessary to install the six marker buoys. The drawings and specifications will then be used
by the City to direct volunteers, a qualified diver contractor, or marine contractor to install the buoys and
anchoring system. The buoys will be anchored using either manta-ray, helical or deadman anchors with a
synthetic-rope tether and mounting chain. The project may be publicly bid.
Assumptions:
•The City will provide the approximate location of the six buoys as provided by the US Coast
Guard.
EXHIBIT ADocusign Envelope ID: A54763BE-371A-4E8C-8F7A-16F431997D21
Item 8.5
Packet pg. 207/524
Item 8.5
Packet pg. 207/524
SCOPE OF WORK
Page 2 of 3
• The design package will consist of no more than two sheets (plan sheet, detail sheet) with
installation requirements and specifications listed on drawings.
• Engineering plans will be used as exhibits in the JARPA package prepared in the following task.
• Plan sheets will be in a JARPA format.
• No construction cost estimate will be provided.
• Specifications for the installation, to the extent that they are required, will be added to the permit
drawings.
Deliverables:
• Draft and final design package
Task 3 – Permitting Support
This task will begin with a pre-application meeting with the City, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,
Washington Department of Fish & Wildlife (WDFW) and Washington Department of Natural Resources
(DNR). A representative from the Tulalip Tribes may also attend. At this meeting, permit requirements for
the installation will be discussed. The permit requirements for the project will be determined in this
meeting. However, for the purposes of this SOW, certain assumptions about the permits to be required
have been made based on past experience. These are detailed below.
The project will require compliance with the State Environmental Protection Act (SEPA). This will
necessitate the completion of a SEPA Checklist. Herrera will complete the checklist and allow for one
round of City review.
The project will qualify for a Shoreline Exemption per Edmonds Shoreline Master Program
(24.80.110.A(5)).
The project will require compliance with Section 404 and possibly Section 10 of the Clean Water Act. It
will also require a Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA) from WDFW. To facilitate compliance of these
requirements, a Joint Aquatic Resources Permit Application (JARPA) will be completed. It is expected that
the project will qualify for NWP 10 with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and that only a JARPA will be
required for federal permitting requirements. Exhibits describing the design will be completed in the
previous task. Herrera will complete a draft JARPA and allow for one round of City review.
Assumptions:
• A pre-application meeting will occur between U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Washington
Department of Fish & Wildlife, Washington Department of Natural Resources will occur virtually.
• The project manager and permit lead for Herrera will attend the pre-application meeting.
• No other meetings with regulatory agencies will be required.
• The project will not require a site visit.
Docusign Envelope ID: A54763BE-371A-4E8C-8F7A-16F431997D21
Item 8.5
Packet pg. 208/524
Item 8.5
Packet pg. 208/524
SCOPE OF WORK
Page 3 of 3
• Herrera will act as the JARPA agent on the City’s behalf.
Deliverables:
• Meeting minutes of the pre-application meeting
• Draft and final SEPA Checklist
• Draft and final JARPA application
Task 4 – DNR Lease Support
Some portion of the Underwater Park in addition to the Pier and South Brackett’s Landing buoy locations
are owned by DNR. The City requires renegotiation of its lease with DNR in the Underwater Dive Park
and a new lease with DNR for the other two locations. The Underwater Dive Park buoy installation will
require a Work Approval Letter with DNR. Herrera will support the City in its negotiations.
Assumptions:
• The City will provide the approximation and drawing or .shp file of the City’s property limits
• Some part of the Underwater Park and some of the buoy locations are waterward of the City’s
property.
• DNR authorization for the project will be facilitated by completed by Attachment E of the JARPA
completed in the previous task.
• Two Herrera staff will attend up to two virtual meetings in the City’s negotiations with DNR.
Deliverables:
• Meeting minutes
Docusign Envelope ID: A54763BE-371A-4E8C-8F7A-16F431997D21
Item 8.5
Packet pg. 209/524
Item 8.5
Packet pg. 209/524
Cost Estimate for Edmonds Marker Buoys
Herrera Project No. 25-08808-000
8/11/2025 Task No.1 2 3 4
Herrera Labor based on:Burdened Labor Rates Project
Management
Engineering
Design
Permitting
Support
DNR Lease
Support
Task Start Date 8/18/2025 9/1/2025 10/1/2025 11/3/2025
Task End Date 8/18/2026 3/2/2026 2/2/2026 4/3/2026
Staff Labor Category 2025 Burdened Labor Rates
Parsons, Jeff Engineer VI $299.73 13 20 20 8 61
Spillane, Michael Engineer VIII $381.35 0 6 0 0 6
Rudnick, Tracy Project Accountant IV $178.14 10 0 0 0 10
Merten, Christina Scientist VII $311.06 0 2 16 0 18
Plumb, Riley Scientist III $165.63 2 0 104 0 106
Mirabile, Tina Scientist IV $226.61 0 0 8 4 12
Jackowich, Pamela Administrative Coordinator IV $146.13 0 0 4 0 4
Marshall, Eric CAD Designer V $185.70 2 48 0 0 50
Total Hours per Task 27 76 152 12 267
Subtotal Labor $6,380 $17,818 $30,594 $3,304 $58,097
Subtotal Herrera Labor $6,380 $17,818 $30,594 $3,304 $58,097
4%Escalation on Herrera Labor in 2026 $170 $238 $306 $79 $793
Escalated Subtotal Herrera Labor $6,551 $18,056 $30,900 $3,384 $58,890
Grand Subtotal $6,551 $18,056 $30,900 $3,384 $58,890
Grand Total $58,890
Note: Herrera adjusts labor rates annually in January unless contract specifies otherwise.
Schedule
Total
Docusign Envelope ID: A54763BE-371A-4E8C-8F7A-16F431997D21
Item 8.5
Packet pg. 210/524
Item 8.5
Packet pg. 210/524
Has the original City contract boilerplate language been modified? Yes No
If yes, specify which sections have been modified:
Description
of Services:
Type of Contract: (GR) Grants (I) Intergovernmental Agreement (L) Lease Agreement
Bid/RFP Number:
(S) Purchase of Services (W) Public Works (O) Other
Effective Date: Completion Date:
Originator: Routed by:
Department/Division: Date:
Name of Consultant/Contractor:
CONTRACT TITLE:
Total Amount of Contract:
Budget # Amount: Budget # Amount:
Budget # Amount: Budget # Amount:
Budget # Amount: Budget # Amount:
Are there sufficient funds in the current budget to cover this contract? Yes No
Remarks:
Authorization Level:
Project Manager
Risk Management/Budget
City Attorney
Consultant/Contractor
Other
City Council Approval Date (if applicable)
Mayor
City Clerk
SI
G
N
A
T
U
R
E
FI
N
A
N
C
I
A
L
DE
T
A
I
L
S
CO
N
T
R
A
C
T
CO
N
T
E
N
T
DE
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
CONTRACT ROUTING FORM
No.
(City Clerk Use Only)
Angie Feser Amy Cruz
Parks &&& Recreation 0009///1115///2220002225
Herrera Environmental Consultants
Professional Services Agreement
The City desires to engage the professional services and assistance of a
consulting firm to provide permitting,,, design,,, and oversight services for the installation of six
marker safety buoys on the Edmonds waterfront;
$$$ 58,,,89000...000000
ྜ
0009///222000///2220002225
ྜ ྜ
ྜ
Mayor
111222///333111///2220002226
Docusign Envelope ID: A54763BE-371A-4E8C-8F7A-16F431997D21
Item 8.5
Packet pg. 211/524
Item 8.5
Packet pg. 211/524
CITY OF EDMONDS
121 5TH AVENUE NORTH · EDMONDS, WA 98020 · 425-771-0220 · WWW.EDMONDSWA.GOV
MIKE ROSEN MAYOR
AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WHEREAS, the City of Edmonds, Washington, hereinafter referred to as the “City,” and
Herrera Environmental Consultants, Inc., hereinafter referred to as the “Consultant,” entered into
an underlying agreement to provide permitting, design, and oversight services for the installation
of six marker safety buoys on the Edmonds waterfront, dated September 20, 2025 (“Underlying
Agreement”); and
WHEREAS, additional tasks to the original Scope of Work have been identified with
regard to procuring survey services in support of a lease agreement with the Washington
Department of Natural Resources; and
WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend the Underlying Agreement to revise the Scope of
Work and payment provisions thereof;
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of mutual benefits accruing, it is agreed by and
between the parties thereto as follows:
1. The Underlying Agreement of September 20, 2025 between the parties,
incorporated by this reference as fully as if herein set forth, is amended in, but only in, the
following respects:
1.1 Scope of Work. The Scope of Work set forth in the Underlying Agreement
shall be amended to include the additional services and material necessary to accomplish the stated
objectives as outlined in the attached Exhibit A to this Amendment No. 1, incorporated by this
reference as fully as if herein set forth.
1.2 Payments. The $58,890 amount set forth in paragraph 2A of the Underlying
Agreement and stated as an amount which shall not be exceeded, is hereby amended to include an
additional not to exceed amount of $23,957 for the additional scope of work identified in Exhibit
A to this Amendment No. 1. As a result of this Amendment No. 1, the total contract amount is
increased to a new total not-to-exceed amount of $82,847 ($58,890 plus $23,957).
Item 8.5
Packet pg. 212/524
Item 8.5
Packet pg. 212/524
2
1.3 Fee Schedule. Exhibit B to the Underlying Agreement consisting of the rate
and cost reimbursement schedule is hereby amended to include the form set forth on the attached
Exhibit B to this Amendment No. 1, incorporated by this reference as fully as if herein set forth.
2. In all other respects, the Underlying Agreement between the parties shall remain in
full force and effect, amended as set forth in this Amendment No. 1, but only as set forth herein.
DONE this day of , 2026.
CITY OF EDMONDS HERRERA ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, INC.
MIKE ROSEN, MAYOR ATTEST:
________________________________ Luke Lonie, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM:
________________________________ Office of the City Attorney
Item 8.5
Packet pg. 213/524
Item 8.5
Packet pg. 213/524
SCOPE OF WORK
Page 1 of 1
EDMONDS MARKER BUOY SUPPORT –
AMENDMENT 1
On October 8, 2026, Angie Feser of the City of Edmonds (the City) requested Herrera Environmental
Consultants, Inc. (Herrera) prepare an amendment to an original scope of work (SOW) to assist the City in
permitting, design, oversight of installation of six marker buoys; four to demark the Edmonds Underwater
Park (the Underwater Park) and; one off of South Brackett’s Landing both of those areas being near the
Edmonds Ferry Terminal and one more buoy adjacent to the Olympic Beach Fishing Pier in Edmonds,
Washington. The amendment will supplement an existing task in the original contract that serves to
complete a DNR lease for the buoys described previously.
This amendment will also serve to extend, at no cost beyond the additional work described below, the
contract to November 1, 2027.
Task 4 – DNR Lease Support
Herrera will subcontract to David Evans and Associates to perform survey services that will culminate in
the production of drawings to be used in a lease agreement with the Washington Department of Natural
Resources (DNR).
Assumptions
•Herrera will provide coordination with the surveyor and subcontract with the subcontractor
directly.
•The work will be completed in 2026.
•There are two lease areas, one on each side of the Edmonds Ferry Terminal.
•The drawing will not map all features on the seabed in the lease area.
Deliverables
•A stamped drawing of the lease area.
EXHIBIT A
Item 8.5
Packet pg. 214/524
Item 8.5
Packet pg. 214/524
Cost Estimate for Edmonds Marker Buoys
Herrera Project No. 25-08808-000
10/12/2026 Task No.4
Herrera Labor based on:Burdened Labor Rates DNR Lease Support
Task Start Date 10/20/2026
Task End Date 12/21/2026
Staff Labor Category 2026 Burdened Labor Rates
Parsons, Jeff Engineer VI $316.24 4 4
Buckley, Laurel Project Accountant III $146.06 2 2
Total Hours per Task 6 6
Subtotal Labor $1,557 $1,557
Subtotal Herrera Labor $1,557 $1,557
Subconsultants
Subconsultant
DEA $22,400 $22,400
Subtotal Subconsultant Cost $22,400 $22,400
Grand Subtotal $23,957 $23,957
Grand Total $23,957
Note: Herrera adjusts labor rates annually in January unless contract specifies otherwise.
Schedule
Total
Item 8.5
Packet pg. 215/524
Item 8.5
Packet pg. 215/524
1
0
7
2
Agenda Item 8.6
Edmonds City Council
Regular Meeting
October 27, 2026
TITLE:ILA for Allied Law Enforcement Response Team (ALERT)
cooperation (Only One Reading Required)
DEPARTMENT:Police Services
PRESENTER:Chief Loi Dawkins
NEEDED FROM COUNCIL:Action
RECOMMENDATION:Approve the Interlocal Agreement for Allied Law Enforcement
Response Team (ALERT) Cooperation on the consent agenda,
authorizing the Mayor to sign.
BUDGET:
Total Dollar Amount:0.00 ☒ Approved in Budget
Fund(s):General Fund ☐ Budget Reallocation Required
☐ No Budget Impact
PROBLEM/ISSUE STATEMENT:
For 2027, the police department is seeking approval of this contract to ensure the continuation
of our cooperation with the regional Allied Law Enforcement Response Team.
CONTEXT, ANALYSIS, & ALTERNATIVES:
The purpose of this Agreement is to continue the City’s participation in the multi-jurisdictional
Allied Law Enforcement Response Team (ALERT), which provides coordinated resources and
specialized support during civil disturbance incidents that may exceed the capacity of individual
agencies.
Participation in ALERT allows agencies to share personnel, equipment, training, and specialized
expertise, improving regional coordination and reducing duplication of resources. Approval of
the Agreement will allow the Police Department to continue its participation through 2027.
This is a long-standing agreement that will not impact the 2027 budget, as it has already been
built into the police budget requests for 2027.
BUDGET IMPACTS:
There is no general fund impact, as this cost was included in our 2027 budget for supplies and
uniforms for our staff that participate on the ALERT team.
ITEM HISTORY:
N/A
Item 8.6
Packet pg. 216/524
Item 8.6
Packet pg. 216/524
1
0
7
2
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
ATTACHMENTS:
ILA Agreement for ALERT
Item 8.6
Packet pg. 217/524
Item 8.6
Packet pg. 217/524
ALERT ILA 2026 Page 1 of 14
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR
ALLIED LAW ENFORCMENT RESPONSE TEAM (ALERT)
COOPERATION
This INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR ALLIED LAW ENFORCMENT RESPONSE
TEAM (ALERT) COOPERATION, (this “Agreement”) is made and entered into as of this
day: ______________________________by and between SNOHOMISH COUNTY,
apolitical subdivision of the State of Washington (the County), the CITY OF EVERETT,
a Washington municipal corporation (Everett), the CITY OF ARLINGTON, a Washington
municipal corporation (Arlington), the CITY OF BOTHELL, a Washington municipal
corporation (Bothell), the CITY OF EDMONDS, a Washington municipal corporation
(Edmonds), the CITY OF LAKE STEVENS, a Washington municipal corporation (Lake
Stevens), the CITY OF LYNNWOOD, a Washington municipal corporation (Lynnwood),
the CITY OF MARYSVILLE, a Washington municipal corporation (Marysville), the
CITY OF MOUNTLAKE TERRACE, a Washington municipal corporation (Mountlake
Terrace), the CITY OF MUKILTEO, a Washington municipal corporation (Mukilteo).
RECITALS
A. The County and the Cities of Everett, Arlington, Bothell, Edmonds, Lake Stevens,
Lynnwood, Marysville, Mountlake Terrace, Mukilteo (hereinafter Municipalities) are
public agencies as defined by chapter 39.34 RCW and chapter 10.93 RCW, and are
authorized to entered into interlocal agreements to provide for joint or cooperative
actions to provide services and facilities in a manner and pursuant to forms of
governmental organization that will accord best with geographic, economic, population
and other factors influencing the needs and development of local communities; and
B. The County and the Municipalities recognize that incidents of a serious criminal nature
do occur in civil disturbance situations which require a specially trained and equipped
law enforcement response to effectively respond to the situation. These incidents create
demand on both the County and Municipal resources. The parties believe these
resources are economically served by forming a regional Allied Law Enforcement
Response Team (hereinafter ALERT).
C. Freedom of speech is a fundamental right guaranteed by the United States Constitution.
When exercised within the spirit and intent of the law, individuals are afforded the
opportunity to express opinions openly and without fear of reprisal from the
government.
D. All parties intend through this Agreement to combine any respective ALERT resources
to form a single regional ALERT. The regional ALERT shall be specially structured,
trained and equipped to respond to and resolve substantial civil disturbance activity in
both the listed Municipalities and the County.
E. The County and the Municipalities intend that a regional team facilitates increased
Item 8.6
Packet pg. 218/524
Item 8.6
Packet pg. 218/524
ALERT ILA 2026 Page 2 of 14
operational efficiencies and economies of scale by providing a mechanism for the
sharing of material, personnel, knowledge, equipment, and training, all as more fully
described by, and pursuant to the terms and conditions contained in, this Agreement.
AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the respective agreements set forth below
and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are
hereby acknowledged, the County and the Municipalities agree as follows:
1. TERM
1.1 Initial Term
The initial term of this Agreement shall be for one (1) year (the “Initial Term”), from the
effective date of this Agreement. As provided by RCW 39.34.040, this Agreement shall
not take effect unless and until it has: (i) been duly executed by the listed parties; and (ii)
either filed with the Snohomish County Auditor or posted on the County’s Interlocal
Agreements website. Provided, however, that all listed parties’ obligations after December
31, 2026, are contingent upon local legislative appropriation of the necessary funds for this
specific purpose in accordance with each party’s Charter and applicable law.
1.2 Extensions
The term of this Agreement may be extended for up to two (2) additional periods of five
(5) years each (respectively, the “First Extended Term” and the “Second Extended
Term”). Extension of the Agreement shall be automatic unless one of the parties provides
written notice of termination as more fully described in Section 15 of this Agreement.
2. ESTABLISHMENT OF ALERT
The ability to safely control, contain, and resolve civil disturbance incidents that require
the application of specialized equipment, training, and tactics, including but not limited to
community member protection, property protection, crowd control, riotous conduct, and
mass arrests, often strains the resources of the Municipalities and the County. Law
enforcement efforts directed at these civil disturbance incidents have, for the most part,
been conducted by law enforcement agencies working independently. A multi-
jurisdictional effort to respond to and resolve specific civil disturbance criminal incidents
is anticipated to result in more effective pooling of personnel, improved utilization of
County and Municipalities funds, reduced duplication of equipment, improved training,
development of specialized expertise, and increased utilization/application of a combined
special response team. This cooperation results in improved services for the community
members of all participating jurisdictions, increased safety for team members and the
community, and improved cost effectiveness. Therefore, the County and the Municipalities
hereby establish ALERT to effectively address the concerns described above.
Item 8.6
Packet pg. 219/524
Item 8.6
Packet pg. 219/524
ALERT ILA 2026 Page 3 of 14
3. ALERT STRUCTURE
The command cadre consists of the Team Commander and two Assistant Team
Commanders. The parties agree that during this initial period the Team Commander shall
be the current Edmonds PD Commander while the Assistant Team Commanders shall be
the current Everett PD Commander and the Bothell PD Commander. The parties further
agree that as these positions become vacant, the board shall select the Team Commander
and any additional Assistant Team Commanders.
ALERT members shall not include peripheral operators such as vehicle operators, K-9
officers, Public Information Officers, investigators, or intelligence officers that may or may
not respond to an ALERT call in a support function.
4. ALERT ADMINISTRATIVE OVERSIGHT
The ALERT Oversight Board shall consist of the Sheriff and participating Municipalities’
Chiefs of Police, or their designees. The Board shall have administrative oversight of
ALERT, approve changes to standard operating procedures and appoint command
personnel to ALERT. The Board may also approve the annual ALERT budget, provided
that each jurisdiction’s obligation under the ALERT budget is contingent upon local
legislative appropriation of necessary funds.
The Team Commander shall present a report annually to the ALERT Oversight Board that
outlines the prior year's training, missions, personnel changes, staffing, major equipment
acquisitions, and anticipated activity in the coming year.
All parties agree that personnel selection processes, training standards and requirements
will meet the standards outlined in the ALERT Standard Operating Procedure. Nothing in
this Agreement shall prohibit any agency from requiring additional agency-specific
qualification standards and/or training requirements beyond that required in the Standard
Operating Procedure.
5. TEAM COMMAND: ACTIVATION AND DEPLOYMENTS
A. Team Commander:
1. The Team Commander shall have overall operational responsibility and tactical
command during deployments.
2. The Team Commander shall provide oversight of tactical operations and shall
have the responsibility of validating and approving tactical plans and actions.
3. The Team Commander shall report to the Incident Commander when such is
designated.
B. Assistant Team Commander:
1. The Assistant Team Commander shall have responsibility for the deployment
of the Team and directing what Team personnel and assets will be required.
2. The Assistant Team Commander shall direct operations as approved by the
Team commander.
Item 8.6
Packet pg. 220/524
Item 8.6
Packet pg. 220/524
ALERT ILA 2026 Page 4 of 14
3. The Assistant Team Commander shall report to the Team Commander.
4. In the absence of the Team Commander, an Assistant Team Commander shall
assume the functions/responsibilities of the Team Commander.
5. In the absence of an Assistant Team Commander, a qualified Squad Leader
shall be designated by the Team Commander to perform as the Assistant Team
Commander, with the expectation that the designated Squad Leader cannot also
function as the Team Commander.
C. Nothing in this section shall prohibit or otherwise prevent any agency from sending
designated supervisory personnel to any deployment for the purpose of monitoring
and/or evaluating their agency's personnel, training, and or equipment. During a
deployment, operational command shall follow the ALERT Standard Operating
Procedures.
6. DEVELOPMENT AND REVIEW OF STANDARD OPERATING
PROCEDURES
A. The parties shall cooperatively develop a Standard Operating Procedure (SOP)
manual for ALERT.
B. This SOP shall be annually reviewed by the Team Commander and any changes
approved by the ALERT Oversight Board.
7. COST SHARING/BUDGET AND FINANCE
It is the intent of the parties that operational, training, and equipment costs of ALERT be
shared equitably among the parties. It is recognized that ALERT shall not exist as a single
budgeted entity in any agency’s budget. The ALERT Oversight Board shall be responsible
for determining the proper allocation between the parties of any shared costs/expenses
associated with ALERT.
8. COST REIMBURSEMENT
Any party that receives Equipment, as defined below, from another party pursuant to this
Agreement shall reimburse the party that provided the Equipment for the providing party’s
actual costs incurred in providing same. A party that supplies Equipment to another party
under this Agreement shall deliver to the party that received such Equipment a written
invoice detailing the actual costs incurred by the providing party in supplying the
Equipment at issue. The receiving party shall pay the providing party’s invoice within
thirty (30) days of receiving same.
Item 8.6
Packet pg. 221/524
Item 8.6
Packet pg. 221/524
ALERT ILA 2026 Page 5 of 14
9. EQUIPMENT REQUIREMENTS, MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION
For purposes of this Agreement, the term “Equipment” shall refer to any materials, tools,
machinery, equipment, supplies, facilities, or other property used in performing one or
more ALERT activities.
9.1 Basic Requirements
All parties agree to issue/maintain individual equipment, uniforms, protective equipment,
and weapons as outlined in the Standard Operating Procedure. All parties agree to
supply/maintain necessary pooled team equipment as outlined in the Standard Operating
Procedure.
It is the intent of all parties not to restrict personnel operating under a joint agreement from
utilizing any equipment, gear or weapons owned by any party to this Agreement as required
by the Team Commander under the guidelines of the Standard Operating Procedure.
9.2 Care and Maintenance
A party receiving Equipment pursuant to this Agreement shall be responsible for the proper
care, use, maintenance and security of the Equipment from the time the receiving party
receives the Equipment until the Equipment is returned to the providing party. Should any
Equipment be returned to a providing party in a damaged or deteriorated condition (not
attributable to normal wear and tear during proper use), the party that returned the
Equipment in a damaged or deteriorated condition shall pay the party that provided the
Equipment the costs of repairing or replacing the Equipment at issue.
9.3 Use and Operation
The parties agree that equipment provided under this Agreement shall only be used by
personnel qualified in its use through appropriate training and/or supervision.
10. INDEPENDENT CAPACITY
The employees or agents of each party who are engaged in the performance of this
Agreement shall continue to be employees or agents of that party and shall not be
considered for any purpose to be employees or agents of any other party.
11. COVENANT TO COOPERATE
The County and the Municipalities hereby covenant to the other parties to this Agreement
that it shall use good faith efforts to cooperate with the other parties in implementing the
intent and furthering the goals of this Agreement.
12. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS
The County and the Municipalities shall at all times exercise their rights and perform their
respective obligations under this Agreement in full compliance with all applicable laws,
ordinances, rules and regulations of any public authority having jurisdiction.
Item 8.6
Packet pg. 222/524
Item 8.6
Packet pg. 222/524
ALERT ILA 2026 Page 6 of 14
13. INTERLOCAL COOPERATION ACT (Chapter 39.34 RCW)
The purpose of this Agreement is to establish and maintain a multi-jurisdictional
cooperative ALERT to effectively respond to civil disturbance incidents. The parties agree
that no separate legal or administrative entities are necessary to carry out this Agreement.
Except as expressly provided to the contrary in this Agreement, any real or personal
property used or acquired by any party in connection with the performance of this
Agreement shall remain the sole property of such party, and no other party shall have any
interest therein.
14. INDEMNIFICATION
Each party to this Agreement shall indemnify, defend and hold every other party and its
agents, employees and contractors harmless from and against any and all costs, liabilities,
suits, losses, damages, claims, expenses, penalties or charges, including, without limitation,
reasonable attorneys’ fees and disbursements, that the other party may incur or pay out by
reason of: (i) any accidents, damages or injuries to persons or property occurring during
the term of this Agreement, but only to the extent the same are caused by any negligent or
wrongful act of the indemnifying party; or (ii) any breach or Default (as such term is
defined in Section 16.1 below) of the indemnifying party under this Agreement. The
provisions of this Section 13 shall survive the expiration or earlier termination of this
Agreement.
15. NOTIFICATION OF CLAIMS AND LAWSUITS
In the event that claims or a lawsuit are brought against the County and/or the
Municipalities and/or their officers or employees for actions arising out of their conduct in
support of ALERT operations, it shall be the duty of either the County or the Municipalities
to notify the other parties that said claims or lawsuit have been initiated.
16. TERMINATION OR WITHDRAWAL OF A PARTY
16.1 Any party may withdraw from and terminate participation under this
Agreement upon the giving of thirty (30) calendar days advance written notice of intent to
withdraw/terminate to the other Parties herein. Withdrawal during any calendar year shall
not entitle the withdrawing Party to a reduction or refund with respect to funds budgeted
for or otherwise committed with respect to the withdrawing Party for any calendar year.
Termination of this Agreement and/or withdrawal of a Party shall not terminate Section 13
hereof with respect to the withdrawing Party as to any incident arising prior to the
withdrawal of the Party and Section 13 shall survive the termination of this Agreement
with respect to any cause of action, claim or liability arising on or prior to the date of
termination.
16.2 A majority of the parties may terminate this Agreement at any time.
Such termination shall be set forth in a document signed by the authorized Chief Executive
Officer or designee of a majority of the parties.
Item 8.6
Packet pg. 223/524
Item 8.6
Packet pg. 223/524
ALERT ILA 2026 Page 7 of 14
16.3 Upon termination of this Agreement by a majority of the parties,
property used and/or in the possession of ALERT pursuant to the terms and conditions of
this Agreement shall belong to and shall be returned to the party that provided or paid for
such items. Items that were jointly purchased by the County and the Municipalities will be
distributed between the parties on a basis agreed to in writing by the Sheriff and Chiefs of
Police, or their designees.
16.4 In the event that a party withdraws from and terminates participation
under this Agreement in accordance with Section 15.1, property that was paid for and/or
provided by that party and was used and/or in the possession of ALERT pursuant to the
terms and conditions of this Agreement shall belong to and shall be returned to the
withdrawing/terminating party. Items that were jointly purchased by the County and the
Municipalities will continue to remain with and be available for use by ALERT until such
time that this Agreement is terminated in its entirety.
17. DEFAULT AND REMEDIES
17.1 Default
If any party to this Agreement fails to perform any act or obligation required to be
performed by it hereunder, the party or parties to whom such performance was due shall
deliver written notice of such failure to the nonperforming party. The nonperforming party
shall have thirty (30) days after its receipt of such notice in which to correct its failure to
perform the act or obligation at issue, after which time it shall be in default (“Default”)
under this Agreement; provided, however, that if the nonperformance is of a type that could
not reasonably be cured within said thirty (30) day period, then the nonperforming party
shall not be in Default if it commences cure within said thirty (30) day period and thereafter
diligently pursues cure to completion.
17.2 Remedies; Attorneys’ Fees
In the event of a party’s Default under this Agreement, then after giving notice and an
opportunity to cure pursuant to Section 16.1 above, the party or parties to whom the
performance was due shall have the right to exercise any or all rights and remedies
available to it at law or in equity. In any action between any of the parties hereto seeking
the enforcement of any of the terms or provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing party
or parties in such action shall be awarded, in addition to damages, injunctive or other relief,
their reasonable costs and expenses, including, without limitation, reasonable attorneys’
fees.
18. RECORDS
Each Municipality and County shall be responsible for retaining and producing the records
it creates, owns, or uses, in accordance with applicable public records and retention laws
and regulations. Nothing in this section is intended to require a party to collect or produce
records that are not prepared, owned, used, or retained by that agency as defined by the
Public Records Act (Chapter 42.56 RCW).
All records possessed related to the performance of this Agreement shall be available for
Item 8.6
Packet pg. 224/524
Item 8.6
Packet pg. 224/524
ALERT ILA 2026 Page 8 of 14
full inspection and copying by any party. Records maintenance and retention shall be in
accordance with Washington State records retention schedules.
19. NOTICES
Each notice, demand, request, consent, approval, disapproval, designation or other
communication that is permitted or required to be given by one party to another party under
this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be given or made or communicated by: (i)
United States registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested; (ii) any
nationally recognized overnight carrier or express mail service (such as FedEx or DHL)
that provides receipts to indicate delivery; (iii) by personal delivery; or (iv) by facsimile
(with proof of successful transmission). All such communications shall be addressed to the
appropriate Administrator of this Agreement as follows:
Chief Jonathan Ventura Chief Ken Seuberlich
Arlington Police Department Bothell Police Department
110 E 3rd Street 18410 101st Avenue NE
Arlington, WA 98223 Bothell, WA 98011
360-403-3400 425-486-1245
jventura@arlingtonwa.gov ken.seuberlich@bothellwa.gov
Chief Loi Dawkins Chief Robert Goetz
Edmonds Police Department Everett Police Department
205 5th Ave N. 3002 Wetmore Ave
Edmonds, WA 98020 Everett, WA 98201
425-771-0200 425-257-8400
Loi.Dawkins@edmondswa.gov Rgoetz@everettwa.gov
Chief Jeffrey Beazizo Chief Cole Langdon
Lake Stevens Police Department Lynnwood Police Department
1825 S Lake Stevens Rd 19321 44th Ave W
Lake Stevens, WA 98258 Lynnwood, WA 98036
425-622-9401 425-670-5600
jbeazizo@lakestevenswa.gov clangdon@lynnwoodwa.gov
Chief Erik Scairpon Chief Pete Caw
Marysville Police Department Mountlake Terrace Police Department
1635 Grove Street 5308 228th Street SW
Marysville, WA 98270 Mountlake Terrace, WA 98043
360-363-8300 425-776-9173
escairpon@marysvillewa.gov pcaw@ci.mlt.wa.us
Chief Andy Illyn Sheriff Susanna Johnson
Mukilteo Police Department Snohomish County Sheriff’s Office
1005 47th Place West 3000 Rockefeller Ave
Mukilteo, WA 98275 Everett, WA 98201
425-263-8100 425-388-3393
AIllyn@mukilteowa.gov susanna.johnson@snoco.org
Item 8.6
Packet pg. 225/524
Item 8.6
Packet pg. 225/524
ALERT ILA 2026 Page 9 of 14
Any party hereto may, by reasonable notice to the other parties, designate such other
address, or facsimile telephone number for the giving of notices as deemed necessary. All
notices shall be deemed given on the day each such notice is personally delivered,
transmitted by facsimile (with evidence of receipt), or delivered by overnight courier
service, or on the third business day following the day such notice is mailed if mailed in
accordance with this Section.
20. ADDITIONAL PARTIES
Additional governmental entities, including, but not limited to, other municipal
corporations and/or counties, may, in the future, elect to participate in ALERT established
by this Agreement by executing an amendment to this Agreement, substantially in the form
attached hereto as Exhibit A. In order to become effective, each such amendment must be
executed not only by the party desiring to begin participation in the ALERT, but also by
all current parties to this Agreement, and the amendment must then be recorded with the
Snohomish County Auditor.
21. MISCELLANEOUS
21.1 Entire Agreement
This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties regarding the subject
matter hereof and supersedes any and all prior oral or written agreements between the
parties regarding the subject matter contained herein. This Agreement may not be modified
or amended in any manner except by a written document signed by the party against whom
such modification is sought to be enforced.
21.2 Governing Law and Venue
This Agreement shall be governed by and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State
of Washington. The venue of any action arising out of this Agreement shall be in the
Superior Court of the State of Washington, in and for Snohomish County.
21.3 Interpretation
This Agreement and each of the terms and provisions of it are deemed to have been
explicitly negotiated by the parties, and the language in all parts of this Agreement shall,
in all cases, be construed according to its fair meaning and not strictly for or against any of
the parties hereto. The captions and headings in this Agreement are used only for
convenience and are not intended to affect the interpretation of the provisions of this
Agreement. This Agreement shall be construed so that wherever applicable the use of the
singular number shall include the plural number, and vice versa, and the use of any gender
shall be applicable to all genders.
Item 8.6
Packet pg. 226/524
Item 8.6
Packet pg. 226/524
ALERT ILA 2026 Page 10 of 14
21.4 Severability
If any provision of this Agreement or the application thereof to any person or circumstance
shall, for any reason and to any extent, be found invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of
this Agreement and the application of that provision to other persons or circumstances shall
not be affected thereby, but shall instead continue in full force and effect, to the extent
permitted by law.
21.5 No Waiver
A party’s forbearance or delay in exercising any right or remedy with respect to a Default
by another party under this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of the Default at issue.
Nor shall a waiver by a party of any particular Default constitute a waiver of any other
Default or any similar future Default.
21.6 Assignment
This Agreement shall not be assigned, either in whole or in part, by any party without the
express written consent of the other parties, which may be granted or withheld in each
party’s sole discretion. Any attempt to assign this Agreement in violation of the preceding
sentence shall be null and void and shall constitute a Default under this Agreement.
21.7 Warranty of Authority
Each of the signatories hereto warrants and represents that they are competent and
authorized to enter into this Agreement on behalf of the party for whom they purport to
sign this Agreement.
21.8 No Joint Venture
Nothing contained in this Agreement shall be construed as creating any type or manner of
partnership, joint venture or other joint enterprise between the parties.
21.9 Execution in Counterparts
This Agreement may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which shall constitute
an original and all of which shall constitute one and the same agreement.
Signatures on following page
Item 8.6
Packet pg. 227/524
Item 8.6
Packet pg. 227/524
ALERT ILA 2026 Page 11 of 14
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of
the date first above written.
Chief Jonathan Ventura Chief Ken Seuberlich
Arlington Police Department Bothell Police Department
Chief Loi Dawkins Chief Robert Goetz
Edmonds Police Department Everett Police Department
Chief Jeffrey Beazizo Chief Cole Langdon
Lake Stevens Police Department Lynnwood Police Department
Chief Erik Scairpon Chief Pete Caw
Marysville Police Department Mountlake Terrace Police Department
Chief Andy Illyn Sheriff Susanna Johnson
Mukilteo Police Department Snohomish County Sheriff’s Office
Item 8.6
Packet pg. 228/524
Item 8.6
Packet pg. 228/524
ALERT ILA 2026 Page 12 of 14
EXHIBIT A
Amendment Adding an Additional Party
[FIRST] AMENDMENT TO INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR ALLIED
LAW ENFORCEMENT RESPONSE TEAM (ALERT) COOPERATION
THIS [FIRST] AMENDMENT TO INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR ALLIED LAW
ENFORCMENT RESPONSE TEAM (ALERT) AND COOPERATION (“First
Amendment”) is entered into as of this _____ day of ____________________20 ____
(the “Effective Date”), by and among SNOHOMISH COUNTY, a political subdivision of
the State of Washington (the “County”), the CITY OF EVERETT, a Washington
municipal corporation (Everett), the CITY OF ARLINGTON, a Washington municipal
corporation (Arlington), the CITY OF BOTHELL, a Washington municipal corporation
(Bothell), the CITY OF EDMONDS, a Washington municipal corporation (Edmonds), the
CITY OF LAKE STEVENS, a Washington municipal corporation (Lake Stevens), the
CITY OF LYNNWOOD, a Washington municipal corporation (Lynnwood), the CITY
OF MARYSVILLE, a Washington municipal corporation (Marysville), the CITY OF
MOUNTLAKE TERRACE, a Washington municipal corporation (Mountlake Terrace),
the CITY OF MUKILTEO, a Washington municipal corporation (Mukilteo), and
[INSERT NAME], a Washington municipal corporation (collectively, the
“Municipalities”).
WHEREAS, the County and the Municipalities are public agencies as defined by
chapter 39.34 RCW and chapter 10.93 RCW, and are authorized to entered into
interlocal agreements to provide for joint or cooperative actions to provide services and
facilities in a manner and pursuant to forms of governmental organization that will
accord best with geographic, economic, population and other factors influencing the
needs and development of local communities; and
WHEREAS, incidents of a serious criminal nature do occur in civil disturbance
situations which require a specially trained and equipped law enforcement response to
effectively respond to the situation. These incidents create demand on both the County
and Municipal resources which are better and more economically served by forming a
regional Allied Law Enforcement Response Team (hereinafter ALERT); and
WHEREAS, in ____________ of 20__, the County and the Cities of Everett, Arlington,
Bothell, Edmonds, Lake Stevens, Lynnwood, Marysville, Mountlake Terrace, Mukilteo
entered into the Interlocal Agreement for Allied Law Enforcement Response Team
(ALERT) Cooperation (“Interlocal Agreement”) for the purpose of creating ALERT and
establishing the respective parties’ rights, duties and obligations regarding ALERT; and
WHEREAS, the parties to the Interlocal Agreement wish to add [INSERT NAME] to
the Interlocal Agreement through the execution of this [First] Amendment to the
Interlocal Agreement;
Item 8.6
Packet pg. 229/524
Item 8.6
Packet pg. 229/524
ALERT ILA 2026 Page 13 of 14
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises of the parties and for
other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby
acknowledged, the County and the Municipalities agree as follows:
1. ADDITION OF PARTY TO THE AGREEMENT
[INSERT NAME] is hereby added as a party to the Agreement, effective as of the date of
this Addendum. All references in the Agreement to the terms “Municipality” and
“Municipalities” shall henceforth be deemed to include [INSERT NAME]. All terms and
conditions of the Agreement applicable to the Municipalities shall now also apply to
[INSERT NAME].
2. RATIFICATION
Except as expressly modified by this [First] Amendment, the Interlocal Agreement shall
remain in force and effect in accordance with its terms and is hereby ratified and affirmed.
3. EXECUTION IN COUNTERPARTS
This [First] Amendment may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be an
original and all of which shall together constitute one and the same instrument.
4. FILING
As provided by RCW 39.34.040, this [First] Amendment shall be filed prior to its entry in force
with the Snohomish County Auditor, or, alternatively, listed by subject on the website of each
party.
Signatures on following page
Item 8.6
Packet pg. 230/524
Item 8.6
Packet pg. 230/524
ALERT ILA 2026 Page 14 of 14
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this [First] Amendment as of
the date first above written.
Chief Jonathan Ventura Chief Ken Seuberlich
Arlington Police Department Bothell Police Department
Chief Loi Dawkins Chief Robert Goetz
Edmonds Police Department Everett Police Department
Chief Jeffrey Beazizo Chief Cole Langdon
Lake Stevens Police Department Lynnwood Police Department
Chief Erik Scairpon Chief Pete Caw
Marysville Police Department Mountlake Terrace Police Department
Chief Andy Illyn Sheriff Susanna Johnson
Mukilteo Police Department Snohomish County Sheriff’s Office
[Signer]
[AGENCY ADDED]
[Notice Address]
[Notice Address]
[Phone]
[Email]
Item 8.6
Packet pg. 231/524
Item 8.6
Packet pg. 231/524
1
0
7
3
Agenda Item 8.7
Edmonds City Council
Regular Meeting
October 27, 2026
TITLE:WA Traffic Safety Commission Interagency Agreement (Only One
Reading Required)
DEPARTMENT:Police Services
PRESENTER:Chief Loi Dawkins
NEEDED FROM COUNCIL:Action
RECOMMENDATION:Approve the WA Traffic Safety Commission Interagency
Agreement on the consent agenda, authorizing the Mayor to
sign.
BUDGET:
Total Dollar Amount:$0.00 ☐ Approved in Budget
Fund(s):General Fund ☐ Budget Reallocation Required
☒ No Budget Impact
PROBLEM/ISSUE STATEMENT:
For 2026, the attached interagency agreement enables our officers to work traffic safety
emphasis shifts and the WA Traffic Safety Commission to reimburse Edmonds Police
Department for the cost of the officer’s shift.
CONTEXT, ANALYSIS, & ALTERNATIVES:
Attached is the agreement we enter into annually with the Washington State Traffic
Commission to be participants with the Target Zero Task force. Although it’s 20 pages in length,
it defines our responsibilities and duties in order to receive grant funds paying for our Officers
that participate in regional traffic safety efforts such as Holiday DUI emphasis, U Drive/U Text/U
Pay, Click-it or ticket, etc. The funding pays for straight time and portions of benefits we pay as
part of their salary. This agreement does not cost us anything; it only approves reimbursement
from the award.
BUDGET IMPACTS:
There is no general fund impact.
ITEM HISTORY:
N/A
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
ATTACHMENTS:
WEMs Interagency Agreement
Item 8.7
Packet pg. 232/524
Item 8.7
Packet pg. 232/524
HVE_IAA_Agreement_Edmonds Police Department INTERAGENCY AGREEMENT BETWEEN THEWashington Traffic Safety CommissionANDEdmonds Police DepartmentTHIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into by and between the Washington Traffic Safety Commission,hereinafter referred to as “WTSC,” and SUB RECIPIENT NAME Edmonds Police Department, hereinafterreferred to as “SUB-RECIPIENT.”NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the authority provided to WTSC in RCW 43.59 and RCW 39.34,terms, conditions, covenants, and performance contained herein, or attached and incorporated and madea part hereof, the parties mutually agree as follows: 1.PURPOSE OF THE AGREEMENT:The purpose of this Agreement is to provide funding, provided by the United States Department ofTransportation (USDOT) National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) and allowed under theAssistance Listings Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) numbers 20.600 and 20.616 fortraffic safety grant project 2027-HVE-6081-Region 10 HVE, specifically to provide funding for the lawenforcement agencies in WTSC Region 10 to conduct straight time or overtime enforcement activities(traffic safety emphasis patrols) as outlined in the Statement of Work (SOW), in support of Target Zeropriorities. The Target Zero Manager (TZM) and/or the Law Enforcement Liaison (LEL) shall coordinate theSOW with the SUB-RECIPIENT with the goal of reducing traffic crashes.WTSC grant 2027-HVE-6081-Region 10 HVE was awarded to the WTSC Region 10 to supportcollaborative efforts to conduct HVE activities. By signing this agreement, the SUB-RECIPIENT can seekreimbursement for straight time or overtime for approved law enforcement activity expenses incurred asa participant in the region’s HVE grant.2.PERIOD OF PERFORMANCEThe period of performance of this Agreement shall commence upon the date of execution by both parties,but not earlier than October 1, 2026, and remain in effect until September 30, 2027, unless terminatedsooner, as provided herein.3.SCOPE OF WORK3.1.1 Problem ID and/or OpportunityAlthough Washington has experienced encouraging declines in traffic fatalities since the record-high yearof 2023, traffic deaths remain substantially above pre-pandemic levels, and risky driving behaviorscontinue to claim hundreds of lives each year. After reaching 809 fatalities in 2023, the highest annualtotal since 1990, fatalities declined to 737 in 2024 and an estimated 659 in 2025. Despite this progress,Page 1 of 21
Item 8.7
Packet pg. 233/524
Item 8.7
Packet pg. 233/524
Washington has not yet returned to pre-COVID fatality levels, and the primary behavioral factors targetedthrough High Visibility Enforcement remain major contributors to fatal and serious injury crashes.In 2025 alone:•382 fatalities involved an impaired driver.•189 fatalities involved speeding.•115 fatalities involved distracted driving.•122 fatalities involved unrestrained vehicle occupants.•103 motorcyclists were killed.•160 pedestrians and other active transportation users lost their lives, representing the third-highestannual total on record despite recent declines.While many traffic safety measures improved during 2024 and 2025, several areas remain concerning.Fatalities involving drivers age 70 and older increased for the second consecutive year, heavy truck-involved fatalities also increased in 2025, and active transportation fatalities continue to remainhistorically high. In addition, fatal crashes continue to occur statewide, with every county experiencing atleast one fatal crash during the previous three-year period.This project will fund coordinated High Visibility Enforcement mobilizations focused on impaired driving,speeding, distracted driving, occupant protection, motorcycle safety, and pedestrian and bicycle safety.Enforcement activities will be organized through local Target Zero Managers (TZMs), the statewide LawEnforcement Liaison (LEL) network, local Target Zero Task Forces, and the Washington State Patrol tomaximize visibility, improve interagency coordination, and reduce crashes caused by high-risk drivingbehaviors.3.1.2 Project Purpose and StrategiesThis project will fund High Visibility Enforcement (HVE) and Traffic Safety Enforcement Program (TSEP)patrols to prevent impaired driving, distracted driving, seat belt use, speeding, and motorcycle safety.High Visibility Enforcement (HVE) and Traffic Safety Enforcement Program (TSEP) patrols are designedto create deterrence by increasing the expectation of a citation/fine/arrest. Officers may also removehigh risk (impaired) drivers when encountered. So together, this countermeasure works by preventingdangerous driving behaviors and stopping those who still decide to engage in those behaviors.Funding and events will be organized by local TZMs, LELs, and their local Target Zero Task Force. Taskforces will use local data and professional judgement to determine enforcement priorities for theirjurisdictions and will schedule and plan enforcement and outreach activities.Regional participation in the following National Campaigns is mandatory:•Impaired driving enforcement during the Holiday DUI campaign (December 2026).•Distracted driving enforcement during the Distracted Driving campaign (April 2027)•Seat belt enforcement during the Click It or Ticket campaign (May 2027).•Impaired driving enforcement during the Summer DUI campaign (August 2027).These patrols will also be coordinated with the Washington State Patrol (WSP). Target Zero Managerswill establish or strengthen relationships with key WSP district personnel to improve interagencyPage 2 of 21
Item 8.7
Packet pg. 234/524
Item 8.7
Packet pg. 234/524
coordination with the WSP.3.1.3 Requirements for National Mobilizations and Traffic Safety Enforcement Program (TSEP)3.1.3.1.HVE events will be data informed; based on crash data, anecdotal evidence, and the professionaljudgement of task force members. WTSC strongly believes in the expertise of local officers to understandthe highest priority areas in their communities to focus their efforts.3.1.3.2.The SUB-RECIPIENT will ensure that all officers participating in these patrols are BAC certifiedand have received and passed the SFST training.3.1.3.3.SUB-RECIPIENT will ensure all officers participating in Impaired Driving patrols have receivedAdvanced Roadside Impaired Driving Enforcement (ARIDE) training.3.1.3.4.WTSC recommends that the SUB-RECIPIENT ensures that officers use TraCS to issue writtenwarnings instead of delivering them verbally. Recording each stop within the TraCS system not onlyformalizes the warning but also provides valuable information for future reference. This documentationallows subsequent officers to quickly review a driver’s prior interactions, fostering greater awareness andcontinuity in enforcement efforts. By maintaining this record, officers can make more informed decisionsduring future stops and contribute to a consistent approach in managing driver behavior.3.1.3.5.Impaired driving enforcement is a multifaceted process, requiring officers to recognize riskydriving behaviors, carry out thorough investigations, and handle arrests and processing efficiently. WTSCadvises that officers assigned to impaired driving HVE patrols should have completed at least 10 DUIarrests in the past two years. By setting this standard, WTSC ensures that participating officers possessthe necessary experience and skills to accurately identify and apprehend impaired drivers during thesespecialized patrols.3.1.3.6.SUB-RECIPIENT shall ensure all participating personnel will use the WEMS system provided bythe WTSC to record all activities in digital activity logs conducted by their commissioned officerspursuant to the HVE events. Participating officers will fill out all applicable fields of the digital activity logand use the comments field to provide details on irregularities, challenges or other details that would helpexplain what was encountered during their shift. SUB- RECIPIENT will also ensure all supervisors andfiscal staff have the ability to review and edit those activity logs.3.1.3.7.If an officer's contacts per hour rate falls below 2.0, the officer must provide a commentexplaining the circumstance. However, this requirement does not apply in cases where a DUI arrest hasbeen made.3.1.4 Project Intent and Best Practice3.1.4.1.SUB-RECIPIENT is encouraged to help their Region Task Force fulfill the requirement toparticipate in the four mandatory National Campaigns. (Holiday DUI campaign in December 2026,Distracted Driving campaign in April 2027, Click It or Ticket campaign in May 2027 and Summer DUIcampaign in August 2027).Page 3 of 21
Item 8.7
Packet pg. 235/524
Item 8.7
Packet pg. 235/524
NOTE: Agencies must participate in speed or impaired driving enforcement under this agreement to beeligible to receive funding under the WASPC equipment grant.3.1.4.2.SUB-RECIPIENT is strongly encouraged to participate in their task force to plan and executeenforcement events.3.1.4.3.Regional task force will be submitting quarterly progress reports and SUB-RECIPIENT isencouraged to participate to the fullest extent possible. Quarterly progress reports are due January 15,April 15, July 15, and October 15.3.1.4.4.WTSC encourages participating officers to prioritize violations that directly contribute to the injuryand death of road users, such as impaired driving, speeding, distracted driving, non-restraint, etc.3.1.4.5.SUB-RECIPIENT should promote patrol events through all earned, owned and, if funded, paidmedia that is available so that the public is made aware of the event before, during, and after theenforcement takes place. It is best practice to translate messages as needed and invite local mediainvolvement in the effort to reach communities in which HVE will occur.3.1.4.6.SUB-RECIPIENT should strive to actively enforce traffic safety laws focused on collision causingbehaviors in priority areas throughout the year outside of HVE events.3.1.4.7.When participating in motorcycle patrols SUB-RECIPIENT should focus on the illegal and unsafedriving actions of all motor vehicles interacting with motorcycles. This includes speeding, failure to yieldto a motorcycle, following too closely to a motorcycle, distracted driving, etc.3.1.4.8.When participating in motorcycle patrols SUB-RECIPIENT should ensure that enforcement willfocus on the illegal and unsafe driving actions of motorcycles that are known to cause serious and fatalcrashes. This includes impaired driving, speeding, and following too closely.3.1.4.9.Performance will be monitored by the regional TZM, LEL, and Task Force, as well as WTSC. WTSCreserves the right to designate specific officers as ineligible for cost reimbursement. This will occur if anofficer is determined to not have not met the purpose/intent of this grant in multiple emphasis patrols.3.1.4.10.Funds can be used to support the mentoring of officers in traffic enforcement. This can befocused on impaired driving, or general traffic enforcement.For DUI mentorship, WTSC has found it to be best practice to include a mix of instruction and practicalexperience. The mentor should be a DRE when possible, or a highly effective DUI emphasis patrol officerwith a minimum of ARIDE training. Mentor/mentee activities will be pre-approved by the TZM or LEL afterthe mentee submits their interest. Mentees are eligible to participate in impaired driving HVE patrolswithout ARIDE certification.
Page 4 of 21
Item 8.7
Packet pg. 236/524
Item 8.7
Packet pg. 236/524
3.1.4.11.Community outreach/collaboration: Funds can be used to pay for traffic safety focusedcommunity outreach and collaboration activities. The operational approach for regional communityoutreach and collaboration activities should be developed at the Task Force level and be approved by theWTSC. WTSC recommends that these activities include an opportunity for the audience to providefeedback on local traffic safety priorities and activities, which ideally will influence the region's plan fortraffic safety programming.3.1.4.12.In order to receive funding from this grant, agencies must participate with the regional trafficsafety task force/coalition in the planning efforts for these activities.3.1.4.13.WTSC also encourages all law enforcement agencies in Washington to utilize WTSC's dataanalysis resources, such as interactive dashboards and data from a statewide attitudinal survey, as welltheir regional Target Zero Manager to identify priorities for engaging with the community.3.1.4.14.WTSC will provide tools for documenting community collaboration activities, such as the WEMSactivity log.3.1.5 NATIONAL AND STATE-WIDE MOBILIZATIONSNot all agencies are required to participate in all of the mobilizations listed below. However, the regionmust have some law enforcement participation in all of the mobilizations listed. Dates are tentative andmay change when NHTSA publishes their FFY2027 mobilization calendar.Mobilization Dates•Holiday DUI December 14, 2026 – January 3, 2027•Put the Phone Away or Pay April 5 – 12, 2027•Click It or Ticket May 17 – June 6, 2027•Ride Safe Ride On (optional if funded)July 2027 (Dates TBD)•DUI Drive Sober or Get Pulled Over August 11 – September 5, 20273.2 PROJECT GOALSPrevent traffic crashes to reduce traffic related deaths and serious injuries through active, visible,consistent, and targeted traffic law enforcement, law enforcement training, and community outreach. Lawenforcement can have a profound effect on traffic safety and this project aims to increase participationto accomplish that.3.3 COMPENSATION3.3.1 The Compensation for the straight time or overtime work provided in accordance with thisAgreement has been established under the terms of RCW 39.34. The cost of accomplishing the workdescribed in the SOW will not exceed dollar total from amounts listed below. Payment for satisfactoryperformance shall not exceed this amount unless the WTSC and SUB-RECIPIENT mutually agree to ahigher amount in a written Amendment to this Agreement executed by both the WTSC and SUB-RECIPIENT. Comp-time is not considered overtime and will not be approved for payment. All lawenforcement agencies who are active members of the Region’s traffic safety task force with a fullyPage 5 of 21
Item 8.7
Packet pg. 237/524
Item 8.7
Packet pg. 237/524
executed grant agreement are eligible to participate in this grant.3.3.2 WTSC will reimburse for personnel straight time or overtime expenses at 150 percent of theofficer’s normal salary rate plus SUB-RECIPIENT’s contributions to employee benefits, limited to thefollowing:•FICA•Medicare•Any portion of L&I that is paid by the employer (SUB-RECIPIENT)•Retirement contributions paid by the employer (SUB-RECIPIENT) can be included if the contribution isbased on a percentage of their hours worked.Health insurance, or any other benefits not listed above, are not eligible for reimbursement.The SUB-RECIPIENT will provide law enforcement officers with appropriate equipment (e.g., vehicles,radars, portable breath testers, etc.) to participate in the emphasis patrols.3.3.3 Funding alterations are permitted as follows: Upon agreement by the regional TZM and all otherparties impacted by a proposed budget alteration, the budget category amounts may be increased ordecreased without amending this agreement, so long as the total grant award amount does not increase.HVE grant funds should be managed collaboratively by the SUB-RECIPIENT and the TZM.These alterations must be requested through email communication between the regional TZM andassigned WTSC Program Manager. This communication shall include details of the requested budgetmodifications and a description of why these changes are needed. The TZM will also send an updatedquarterly Operations Plan to the WASPC representative monitoring the project if the budget modificationwill result in changes to the previously submitted plan.3.3.4 These funds, designated for salaries and benefits, are intended to pay for the hourly straight time orovertime costs and proportional amounts of fringe benefits of commissioned staff pursuing the activitiesdescribed in the statement of work. These funds may not be used for any other purpose for example anywork required to maintain a law enforcement commission including recertification trainings like firearmqualification. This agreement is expressly designated to fund salaries and benefits. By signing thisagreement, SUB-RECIPIENT agrees to supply all necessary equipment and vehicles needed to accomplishthe work in the scope of work. WTSC is not responsible for any equipment that is lost, stolen, ordestroyed in the execution of the scope of work.3.3.5 Dispatch: WTSC will reimburse communications officers/dispatch personnel for work on thisproject providing SUB- RECIPIENT has received prior approval from their region’s TZM. This activity mustbe overtime and only the expenses listed in section 3.2 and its subsections will be reimbursed.3.3.6 Transport Officers: WTSC will reimburse transport officers for their work on this project providingSUB-RECIPIENT has received approval from their regions TZM. The TZM will work with the regional LEL todetermine if need is warranted for the type of HVE activity. This activity must be overtime and only thePage 6 of 21
Item 8.7
Packet pg. 238/524
Item 8.7
Packet pg. 238/524
expenses listed in section 3.2 and its subsections will be reimbursed.3.3.7 The law enforcement agency involved will not schedule individual officer overtime shifts for longerthan eight hours. WTSC understands there may be instances when more than eight hours are billed dueto DUI processing or other reasons and an explanation should be provided on the WEMS Officer ActivityLog.3.3.8 The law enforcement agency involved will ensure that any reserve officer for whom reimbursementis claimed has exceeded his/her normal weekly working hours when participating in an emphasis patroland is authorized to be paid at the amount requested. Reserve officers may only be paid at the normalhourly rate and not at the 150 percent overtime rate.3.4 PROJECT COSTSThe WTSC has awarded $175,700.00 to the WTSC Region 10 Traffic Safety Task Force for the purposeof conducting coordinated HVE enforcement and community outreach/collaboration activities. Thefunding must be used for traffic safety purposes in the areas of impaired driving, distracted driving,occupant restraint use, speeding, and motorcycle safety. See the project in WEMS for an updateddistribution of funding by specific emphasis area.By signing this agreement, the SUB-RECIPIENT can seek reimbursement for approved straight time orovertime expenses incurred as a participant in this grant. Funds are expressly designated for staffingactivities and may not be used for other expenses that may be incurred, such as vehicle damage, supplyreplacement, etc. All activity must be coordinated by the region’s traffic safety task force and TZM to beeligible for reimbursement.APPLICABLE STATE AND FEDERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS:4.ACTIVITY REPORTSThe SUB-RECIPIENT agrees to have all personnel who work HVE patrols submit a WEMS Officer ActivityLog within 24 hours of the end of all shifts worked. These same logs will be associated with invoices asdetailed in the “BILLING PROCEDURE” section. Use of the Officer Activity Log in the WTSC’s online grantmanagement system, WEMS, is required. Supervisor review and accuracy certification will also be done inWEMS.5.ADVANCE PAYMENTS PROHIBITEDNo payments in advance of or in anticipation of goods or services to be provided under this Agreementshall be made by the WTSC.6.AGREEMENT ALTERATIONS AND AMENDMENTSThis Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement of the Parties in the form of a written request toamend this Agreement. Such amendments shall only be binding if they are in writing and signed bypersonnel authorized to bind each of the Parties. Changes to the budget, SUB-RECIPIENT’S PrimaryPage 7 of 21
Item 8.7
Packet pg. 239/524
Item 8.7
Packet pg. 239/524
Contact, and WTSC Program Manager can be made through email communication and signatures are notrequired.7.ALL WRITINGS CONTAINED HEREINThis Agreement contains all the terms and conditions agreed upon by the parties. No otherunderstandings, oral or otherwise, regarding the subject matter of this Agreement shall be deemed toexist or to bind any of the parties hereto.8.ASSIGNMENTThe SUB-RECIPIENT may not assign the work to be provided under this Agreement, in whole or in part,without the express prior written consent of the WTSC, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld.The SUB-RECIPIENT shall provide the WTSC a copy of all third-party contracts and agreements enteredinto for purposes of fulfilling the SOW. Such third-party contracts and agreements must follow applicablefederal, state, and local law, including but not limited to procurement law, rules, and procedures. If any ofthe funds provided under this Agreement include funds from NHTSA, such third-party contracts andagreements must include the federal provisions set forth in this Agreement in sections 32 through 40.9.ATTORNEYS’ FEESIn the event of litigation or other action brought to enforce the Agreement terms, each party agrees tobear its own attorney fees and costs.10.BILLING PROCEDUREAll invoices for reimbursement of HVE activities will be done using the WTSC’s grant managementsystem, WEMS. WEMS Officer Activity logs will be attached to invoices, directly linking the cost of theactivity to the invoice. Because the activity, approval, and invoicing are all done within WEMS, no back updocumentation is required in most cases.Once submitted by the SUB-RECIPIENT, invoices are routed to the regional TZM for review and approval.The TZM will submit all approved invoices to the WTSC via WEMS within 10 days of receipt.Payment to the SUB-RECIPIENT for approved and completed work will be made by warrant or accounttransfer by WTSC within 30 days of receipt of such properly documented invoices acceptable to WTSC.Upon expiration of the Agreement, any claim for payment not already made shall be submitted within 45days after the expiration date of this Agreement. All invoices for goods received or services performed onor prior to June 30, 2027, must be received by WTSC no later than August 10, 2027. All invoices for goodsreceived or services performed between July 1, 2027 and September 30, 2027, must be received by WTSCno later than November 15, 2027.11.CONFIDENTIALITY / SAFEGUARDING OF INFORMATIONThe SUB-RECIPIENT shall not use or disclose any information concerning the WTSC, or information whichmay be classified as confidential, for any purpose not directly connected with the administration of thisPage 8 of 21
Item 8.7
Packet pg. 240/524
Item 8.7
Packet pg. 240/524
Agreement, except with prior written consent of the WTSC, or as may be required by law.12.COST PRINCIPLESCosts incurred under this Agreement shall adhere to provisions of 2 CFR Part 200 Subpart E.13.COVENANT AGAINST CONTINGENT FEESThe SUB-RECIPIENT warrants that it has not paid, and agrees not to pay, any bonus, commission,brokerage, or contingent fee to solicit or secure this Agreement or to obtain approval of any applicationfor federal financial assistance for this Agreement. The WTSC shall have the right, in the event of breachof this section by the SUB-RECIPIENT, to annul this Agreement without liability.14.DISPUTES14.1.Disputes arising in the performance of this Agreement, which are not resolved by agreement of theparties, shall be decided in writing by the WTSC Deputy Director or designee. This decision shall be finaland conclusive, unless within 10 days from the date of the SUB-RECIPIENT’s receipt of WTSC’s writtendecision, the SUB-RECIPIENT furnishes a written appeal to the WTSC Director. The SUB-RECIPIENT’sappeal shall be decided in writing by the Director or designee within 30 days of receipt of the appeal bythe Director. The decision shall be binding upon the SUB-RECIPIENT and the SUB-RECIPIENT shall abideby the decision.14.2.Performance During Dispute. Unless otherwise directed by WTSC, the SUB-RECIPIENT shallcontinue performance under this Agreement while matters in dispute are being resolved.14.3 In the event that either Party deems it necessary to institute legal action or proceedings to enforceany right or obligation under this Agreement, the Parties hereto agree that any such action or proceedingsshall be brought in the superior court situated in Thurston County, Washington.15.GOVERNANCE15.1.This Agreement is entered into pursuant to and under the authority granted by the laws of the stateof Washington and any applicable federal laws. The provisions of this Agreement shall be construed toconform to those laws.15.2.In the event of an inconsistency in the terms of this Agreement, or between its terms and anyapplicable statute or rule, the inconsistency shall be resolved by giving precedence in the following order:15.2.1.Applicable federal and state statutes and rules15.2.2.Terms and Conditions of this Agreement15.2.3.Any Amendment executed under this Agreement15.2.4.Any SOW executed under this Agreement
Page 9 of 21
Item 8.7
Packet pg. 241/524
Item 8.7
Packet pg. 241/524
15.2.5.Any other provisions of the Agreement, including materials incorporated by reference16.INCOMEAny income earned by the SUB-RECIPIENT from the conduct of the SOW (e.g., sale of publications,registration fees, or service charges) must be accounted for, reported to WTSC, and that income must beapplied to project purposes or used to reduce project costs.17.INDEMNIFICATION17.1.To the fullest extent permitted by law, the SUB-RECIPIENT shall indemnify and hold harmless theWTSC, its officers, employees, and agents, and process and defend at its own expense any and all claims,demands, suits at law or equity, actions, penalties, losses, damages, or costs of whatsoever kind(“claims”) brought against WTSC arising out of or in connection with this Agreement and/or the SUB-RECIPIENT’s performance or failure to perform any aspect of the Agreement. This indemnity provisionapplies to all claims against WTSC, its officers, employees, and agents arising out of, in connection with,or incident to the acts or omissions of the SUB-RECIPIENT, its officers, employees, agents, contractors,and subcontractors. Provided, however, that nothing herein shall require the SUB-RECIPIENT to indemnifyand hold harmless or defend the WTSC, its agents, employees, or officers to the extent that claims arecaused by the negligent acts or omissions of the WTSC, its officers, employees or agents; and providedfurther that if such claims result from the concurrent negligence of:(a) the SUB-RECIPIENT, its officers, employees, agents, contractors, or subcontractors, and(b) the WTSC, its officers, employees, or agents, or involves those actions covered by RCW 4.24.115, theindemnity provisions provided herein shall be valid and enforceable only to the extent of the negligence ofthe SUB- RECIPIENT, its officers, employees, agents, contractors, or subcontractors.17.2.The SUB-RECIPIENT agrees that its obligations under this Section extend to any claim, demandand/or cause of action brought by, or on behalf of, any of its employees or agents in the performance ofthis agreement. For this purpose, the SUB- RECIPIENT, by mutual negotiation, hereby waives with respectto WTSC only, any immunity that would otherwise be available to it against such claims under theIndustrial Insurance provisions chapter 51.12 RCW.17.3.The indemnification and hold harmless provision shall survive termination of this Agreement.18.INDEPENDENT CAPACITYThe employees or agents of each party who are engaged in the performance of this Agreement shallcontinue to be employees or agents of that party and shall not be considered for any purpose to beemployees or agents of the other party.19.INSURANCE COVERAGE19.1.The SUB-RECIPIENT shall comply with the provisions of Title 51 RCW, Industrial Insurance, ifrequired by law.19.2.If the SUB-RECIPIENT is not required to maintain insurance in accordance with Title 51 RCW, prior toPage 10 of 21
Item 8.7
Packet pg. 242/524
Item 8.7
Packet pg. 242/524
the start of any performance of work under this Agreement, the SUB-RECIPIENT shall provide WTSC withproof of insurance coverage (e.g., vehicle liability insurance, private property liability insurance, orcommercial property liability insurance), as determined appropriate by WTSC, which protects the SUB-RECIPIENT and WTSC from risks associated with executing the SOW associated with this Agreement.20.LICENSING, ACCREDITATION, AND REGISTRATIONThe SUB-RECIPIENT shall comply with all applicable local, state, and federal licensing, accreditation, andregistration requirements and standards necessary for the performance of this Agreement. The SUB-RECIPIENT shall complete registration with the Washington State Department of Revenue, if required, andbe responsible for payment of all taxes due on payments made under this Agreement.21.RECORDS MAINTENANCE21.1.During the term of this Agreement and for six years thereafter, the SUB-RECIPIENT shall maintainbooks, records, documents, and other evidence that sufficiently and properly reflect all direct and indirectcosts expended in the performance of the services described herein. These records shall be subject toinspection, review, or audit by authorized personnel of the WTSC, the Office of the State Auditor, andfederal officials so authorized by law. All books, records, documents, and other material relevant to thisAgreement will be retained for six years after expiration. The Office of the State Auditor, federal auditors,the WTSC, and any duly authorized representatives shall have full access and the right to examine any ofthese materials during this period.21.2.Records and other documents, in any medium, furnished by one party to this Agreement to the otherparty, will remain the property of the furnishing party, unless otherwise agreed. The receiving party will notdisclose or make available this material to any third parties without first giving notice to the furnishingparty and giving them a reasonable opportunity to respond. Each party will utilize reasonable securityprocedures and protections to assure that records and documents provided by the other party are noterroneously disclosed to third parties.22.RIGHT OF INSPECTIONThe SUB-RECIPIENT shall provide right of access to its facilities to the WTSC or any of its officers, or toany other authorized agent or official of the state of Washington or the federal government, at allreasonable times, in order to monitor and evaluate performance, compliance, and/or quality assuranceunder this Agreement. The SUB-RECIPIENT shall make available information necessary for WTSC tocomply with the right to access, amend, and receive an accounting of disclosures of their PersonalInformation according to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) or anyregulations enacted or revised pursuant to the HIPAA provisions and applicable provisions of WashingtonState law. The SUB- RECIPIENT shall upon request make available to the WTSC and the United StatesSecretary of the Department of Health and Human Services all internal policies and procedures, books,and records relating to the safeguarding, use, and disclosure of Personal Information obtained or used asa result of this Agreement.23.RIGHTS IN DATA23.1.WTSC and SUB-RECIPIENT agree that all data and work products (collectively called “WorkPage 11 of 21
Item 8.7
Packet pg. 243/524
Item 8.7
Packet pg. 243/524
Product”) pursuant to this Agreement shall be considered works made for hire under the U.S. CopyrightAct, 17 USC §101 et seq., and shall be owned by the state of Washington. Work Product includes, but isnot limited to, reports, documents, pamphlets, advertisement, books, magazines, surveys, studies,computer programs, films, tapes, sound reproductions, designs, plans, diagrams, drawings, software,and/or databases to the extent provided by law. Ownership includes the right to copyright, register thecopyright, distribute, prepare derivative works, publicly perform, publicly display, and the ability tootherwise use and transfer these rights.23.2.If for any reason the Work Product would not be considered a work made for hire under applicablelaw, the SUB- RECIPIENT assigns and transfers to WTSC the entire right, title, and interest in and to allrights in the Work Product and any registrations and copyright applications relating thereto and anyrenewals and extensions thereof.23.3.The SUB-RECIPIENT may publish, at its own expense, the results of project activities without priorreview by the WTSC, provided that any publications (written, visual, or sound) contain acknowledgment ofthe support provided by NHTSA and the WTSC. Any discovery or invention derived from work performedunder this project shall be referred to the WTSC, who will determine through NHTSA whether patentprotections will be sought, how any rights will be administered, and other actions required to protect thepublic interest.24.SAVINGSIn the event funding from state, federal, or other sources is withdrawn, reduced, or limited in any way afterthe effective date of this Agreement and prior to completion of the SOW under this Agreement, the WTSCmay terminate the Agreement under the "TERMINATION FOR CONVENIENCE" clause, without the 30-daynotice requirement. The Agreement is subject to renegotiation at the WTSC’s discretion under any newfunding limitations or conditions.25.SEVERABILITYIf any provision of this Agreement or any provision of any document incorporated by reference shall beheld invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the other provisions of this Agreement which can be giveneffect without the invalid provision, if such remainder conforms to the requirements of applicable law andthe fundamental purpose of this Agreement, and to this end the provisions of this Agreement aredeclared to be severable.26.SITE SECURITYWhile on WTSC premises, the SUB-RECIPIENT, its agents, employees, or sub-contractors shall conform inall respects with all WTSC physical, fire, or other security policies and applicable regulations.27.TAXESAll payments of payroll taxes, unemployment contributions, any other taxes, insurance, or other suchexpenses for the SUB- RECIPIENT or its staff shall be the sole responsibility of the SUB-RECIPIENT.
Page 12 of 21
Item 8.7
Packet pg. 244/524
Item 8.7
Packet pg. 244/524
28.TERMINATION FOR CAUSEIf the SUB-RECIPIENT does not fulfill in a timely and proper manner its obligations under this Agreementor violates any of these terms and conditions, the WTSC will give the SUB-RECIPIENT written notice ofsuch failure or violation, and may terminate this Agreement immediately. At the WTSC’s discretion, theSUB-RECIPIENT may be given 15 days to correct the violation or failure. In the event that the SUB-RECIPIENT is given the opportunity to correct the violation and the violation is not corrected within the 15-day period, this Agreement may be terminated at the end of that period by written notice of the WTSC.29.TERMINATION FOR CONVENIENCEExcept as otherwise provided in this Agreement, either party may terminate this Agreement, withoutcause or reason, with 30 days written notice to the other party. If this Agreement is so terminated, theWTSC shall be liable only for payment required under the terms of this Agreement for services renderedor goods delivered prior to the effective date of termination.30.TREATMENT OF ASSETS30.1.Title to all property furnished by the WTSC shall remain property of the WTSC. Title to all propertyfurnished by the SUB- RECIPIENT for the cost of which the SUB-RECIPIENT is entitled to be reimbursed asa direct item of cost under this Agreement shall pass to and vest in the WTSC upon delivery of suchproperty by the SUB-RECIPIENT. Title to other property, the cost of which is reimbursable to the SUB-RECIPIENT under this Agreement, shall pass to and vest in the WTSC upon (i) issuance for use of suchproperty in the performance of this Agreement, or (ii) commencement of use of such property in theperformance of this Agreement, or (iii) reimbursement of the cost thereof by the WTSC in whole or in part,whichever first occurs.30.2.Any property of the WTSC furnished to the SUB-RECIPIENT shall, unless otherwise provided hereinor approved by the WTSC, be used only for the performance of this Agreement.30.3.The SUB-RECIPIENT shall be responsible for any loss or damage to property of the WTSC whichresults from the negligence of the SUB-RECIPIENT or which results from the failure on the part of theSUB-RECIPIENT to maintain and administer that property in accordance with sound managementpractices.30.4.If any WTSC property is lost, destroyed, or damaged, the SUB-RECIPIENT shall immediately notifythe WTSC and shall take all reasonable steps to protect the property from further damage.30.5.The SUB-RECIPIENT shall surrender to the WTSC all property of the WTSC upon completion,termination, or cancellation of this Agreement.30.6.All reference to the SUB-RECIPIENT under this clause shall also include SUB-RECIPIENT'semployees, agents, or sub- contractors.31.WAIVERA failure by either party to exercise its rights under this Agreement shall not preclude that party fromPage 13 of 21
Item 8.7
Packet pg. 245/524
Item 8.7
Packet pg. 245/524
subsequent exercise of such rights and shall not constitute a waiver of any other rights under thisAgreement.APPLICABLE CERTIFICATIONS AND ASSURANCES FOR HIGHWAY SAFETY GRANTS (23 CFR PART 1300APPENDIX A):In all future references to sub-recipients, the term "SUB-RECIPIENT" shall also apply to its agents,employees, sub-contractors, and other participants of Federal financial assistance under such program.SUB-RECIPIENT, its agents, employees, sub-contractors, and other participants will comply with allrequirements imposed or pursuant to the Acts, the Regulations, and this Assurance.32.FEDERAL FUNDING ACCOUNTABILITY AND TRANSPARENCY ACT (FFATA)In accordance with FFATA, the SUB-RECIPIENT shall, upon request, provide WTSC the names and totalcompensation of the five most highly compensated officers of the entity, if the entity in the precedingfiscal year received 80 percent or more of its annual gross revenues in federal awards, received$25,000,000 or more in annual gross revenues from federal awards, and if the public does not haveaccess to information about the compensation of the senior executives of the entity through periodicreports filed under section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or section 6104 of theInternal Revenue Code of 1986.33.FEDERAL NONDISCRIMINATION (Title VI, 42 U.S.C. § 2000d et seq.)Instructions for Lower Tier Certification33.1.By signing this Agreement, the SUB-RECIPIENT (hereinafter in this section referred to as the “lowertier participant”) is providing the certification set out below and agrees to comply with the requirementsof 2 CFR part 180 and 23 CFR part 1200.33.2.The certification in this section is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placedwhen this transaction was entered into. If it is later determined that the lower tier participant knowinglyrendered an erroneous certification, in addition to other remedies available to the federal government, thedepartment or agency with which this transaction originated may pursue available remedies, includingsuspension and/or debarment.33.3.The lower tier participant shall provide immediate written notice to the WTSC if at any time thelower tier participant learns that its certification was erroneous when submitted or has become erroneousby reason of changed circumstances.33.4.The terms covered transaction, civil judgement, debarment, suspension, ineligible, participant,person, principal, and voluntarily excluded, as used in this clause, are defined in 2 CFR parts 180 and1200.33.5.The lower tier participant agrees by signing this Agreement that it shall not knowingly enter into anylower tier covered transaction with a person who is proposed for debarment under 48 CFR part 9, subpartPage 14 of 21
Item 8.7
Packet pg. 246/524
Item 8.7
Packet pg. 246/524
9.4, debarred, suspended, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this coveredtransaction, unless authorized by WTSC.33.6.The lower tier participant further agrees by signing this Agreement that it will include the clausetitled “Instructions for Lower Tier Certification” including the “Certification Regarding Debarment,Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion - Lower Tier Covered Transaction,” without modification,in all lower tier covered transactions and in all solicitations for lower tier covered transactions, and willrequire lower tier participants to comply with 2 CFR part 180 and 23 CFR part 1200.33.7.A participant in a covered transaction may rely upon a certification of a prospective participant in alower tier covered transaction that it is not proposed for debarment under 48 CFR part 9, subpart 9.4,debarred, suspended, ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from the covered transaction, unless it knows thatthe certification is erroneous. A participant is responsible for ensuring that its principals are notsuspended, debarred, or otherwise ineligible to participate in covered transactions. To verify the eligibilityof its principals, as well as the eligibility of any prospective lower tier participants, each participant may,but is not required to, check the System for Award Management Exclusions website(https://www.sam.gov/).33.8.Nothing contained in the foregoing shall be construed to require establishment of a system ofrecords in order to render in good faith the certification required by this clause. The knowledge andinformation of a participant is not required to exceed that which is normally possessed by a prudentperson in the ordinary course of business dealings.33.9.Except for transactions authorized under paragraph 33.5. of these instructions, if a participant in acovered transaction knowingly enters into a lower tier covered transaction with a person who is proposedfor debarment under 48 CFR part 9, subpart 9.4, suspended, debarred, ineligible, or voluntarily excludedfrom participation in this transaction, in addition to other remedies available to the Federal government,the department or agency with which this transaction originated may pursue available remedies, includingsuspension or debarment.Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion - Lower Tier CoveredTransactions33.10.The lower tier participant certifies, by signing this Agreement, that neither it nor its principals arepresently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded fromparticipation in this transaction by any federal department or agency.33.11.Where the lower tier participant is unable to certify to any of the statements in this certification,such participant shall attach an explanation to this Agreement.34.THE DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE ACT OF 1988 (41 U.S.C. 8103)34.1.The SUB-RECIPIENT shall:
Page 15 of 21
Item 8.7
Packet pg. 247/524
Item 8.7
Packet pg. 247/524
34.1.1.Publish a statement notifying employees that the unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensing,possession, or use of a controlled substance is prohibited in the SUB-RECIPIENT’s workplace, and shallspecify the actions that will be taken against employees for violation of such prohibition.34.1.2.Establish a drug-free awareness program to inform employees about the dangers of drug abuse inthe workplace; the SUB- RECIPIENT’s policy of maintaining a drug-free workplace; any available drugcounseling, rehabilitation, and employee assistance programs; and the penalties that may be imposedupon employees for drug violations occurring in the workplace.34.1.3.Make it a requirement that each employee engaged in the performance of the grant be given acopy of the statement required by paragraph 34.1.1. of this section.34.1.4.Notify the employee in the statement required by paragraph 34.1.1. of this section that, as acondition of employment under the grant, the employee will abide by the terms of the statement, notifythe employer of any criminal drug statute conviction for a violation occurring in the workplace no laterthan five days after such conviction, and notify the WTSC within 10 days after receiving notice from anemployee or otherwise receiving actual notice of such conviction.34.1.5.Take one of the following actions within 30 days of receiving notice under paragraph 34.1.3. ofthis section, with respect to any employee who is so convicted: take appropriate personnel action againstsuch an employee, up to and including termination, and/or require such employee to participatesatisfactorily in a drug abuse assistance or rehabilitation program approved for such purposes by afederal, state, or local health, law enforcement, or other appropriate agency.34.1.6.Make a good faith effort to continue to maintain a drug-free workplace through implementation ofall of the paragraphs above.35.FEDERAL FUNDING ACCOUNTABILITY AND TRANSPARENCY ACT (FFATA)In accordance with FFATA, the SUB-RECIPIENT shall, upon request, provide WTSC the names and totalcompensation of the five most highly compensated officers of the entity, if the entity in the precedingfiscal year received 80 percent or more of its annual gross revenues in federal awards, received$25,000,000 or more in annual gross revenues from federal awards, and if the public does not haveaccess to information about the compensation of the senior executives of the entity through periodicreports filed under section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or section 6104 of theInternal Revenue Code of 1986.36.FEDERAL LOBBYING36.1.The undersigned certifies, to the best of his or her knowledge and belief, that:36.1.1.No federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the undersigned,to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Memberof Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connectionwith the awarding of any federal contract, the making of any federal grant, the making of any federal loan,Page 16 of 21
Item 8.7
Packet pg. 248/524
Item 8.7
Packet pg. 248/524
the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, ormodification of any federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement.36.1.2.If any funds other than federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person forinfluencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, anofficer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this federalcontract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall complete and submit StandardForm-LLL, Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying, in accordance with its instructions.36.1.3.The undersigned shall require that the language of this certification be included in the awarddocuments for all sub- awards at all tiers (including sub-contracts, sub-grants, and contracts under grant,loans, and cooperative agreements), and that all sub- recipients shall certify and disclose accordingly.36.2.This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when thistransaction was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making orentering into this transaction imposed by Section 1352, Title 31, U.S. Code. Any person who fails to filethe required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than$100,000 for each such failure.37.FEDERAL NONDISCRIMINATION (Title VI, 42 U.S.C. § 2000d et seq.)37.1.The State highway safety agency [and its SUB-RECIPIENTs] will comply with all Federal statutes andimplementing regulations relating to nondiscrimination (“Federal Nondiscrimination Authorities”). Theseinclude but are not limited to:37.1.1.Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000d et seq., 78 stat. 252), (prohibitsdiscrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin);37.1.2.49 CFR part 21 (entitled Non-discrimination in Federally-Assisted Programs of the Department ofTransportation—Effectuation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964);37.1.3.28 CFR section 50.3 (U.S. Department of Justice Guidelines for Enforcement of Title VI of the CivilRights Act of 1964);37.1.4.The Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, (42 U.S.C.4601), (prohibits unfair treatment of persons displaced or whose property has been acquired because ofFederal or Federal-aid programs and projects);37.1.5.Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1973, (23 U.S.C. 324 et seq.), and Title IX of the EducationAmendments of 1972, as amended (20 U.S.C. 1681-1683 and 1685-1686) (prohibit discrimination on thebasis of sex);37.1.6.Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, (29 U.S.C. 794 et seq.), as amended, (prohibitsdiscrimination on the basis of disability) and 49 CFR part 27;Page 17 of 21
Item 8.7
Packet pg. 249/524
Item 8.7
Packet pg. 249/524
37.1.7.The Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended, (42 U.S.C. 6101 et seq.), (prohibitsdiscrimination on the basis of age);37.1.8.The Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987, (Pub. L. 100-209), (broadens scope, coverage andapplicability of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, The Age Discrimination Act of 1975 and Section504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, by expanding the definition of the terms "programs or activities" toinclude all of the programs or activities of the Federal aid SUB-RECIPIENTs, subrecipients andcontractors, whether such programs or activities are Federally-funded or not);37.1.9.Titles II and III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (42 U.S.C. 12131-12189) (prohibitsdiscrimination on the basis of disability in the operation of public entities, public and privatetransportation systems, places of public accommodation, and certain testing) and 49 CFR parts 37 and38;During the performance of this contract/funding agreement, the SUB-RECIPIENT agrees:37.1.10.To comply with all Federal nondiscrimination laws and regulations, as may be amended fromtime to time;37.1.11.Not to participate directly or indirectly in the discrimination prohibited by any Federal non-discrimination law or regulation, as set forth in Appendix B of 49 CFR part 2l and herein;37.1.12.To permit access to its books, records, accounts, other sources of information, and its facilitiesas required by the State highway safety office, US DOT or NHTSA;37.1.13.That, in event a SUB-RECIPIENT fails to comply with any nondiscrimination provisions in thiscontract/funding agreement, the State highway safety agency will have the right to impose suchcontract/agreement sanctions as it or NHTSA determine are appropriate, including but not limited towithholding payments to the SUB-RECIPIENT/funding recipient under the contract/agreement until theSUB-RECIPIENT/funding recipient complies; and/or cancelling, terminating, or suspending a contract orfunding agreement, in whole or in part; and37.1.14.To insert this clause, including paragraphs a through e, in every subcontract and subagreementand in every solicitation for a subcontract or sub-agreement, that receives Federal funds under thisprogram.38.POLITICAL ACTIVITY (HATCH ACT)The SUB-RECIPIENT will comply with provisions of the Hatch Act (5 U.S.C. 1501-1508), which limit thepolitical activities of employees whose principal employment activities are funded in whole or in part withfederal funds.39.PROHIBITION ON USING GRANT FUNDS TO CHECK FOR HELMET USAGE
Page 18 of 21
Item 8.7
Packet pg. 250/524
Item 8.7
Packet pg. 250/524
The SUB-RECIPIENT will not use 23 U.S.C. Chapter 4 grant funds for programs to check helmet usage orto create checkpoints that specifically target motorcyclists. This Agreement does not include any aspectsor elements of helmet usage or checkpoints, and so fully complies with this requirement.40.STATE LOBBYINGNone of the funds under this Agreement will be used for any activity specifically designed to urge orinfluence a state or local legislator to favor or oppose the adoption of any specific legislative proposalpending before any state or local legislative body. Such activities include both direct and indirect (e.g.,“grassroots”) lobbying activities, with one exception. This does not preclude a state official whose salaryis supported with NHTSA funds from engaging in direct communications with state or local legislativeofficials, in accordance with customary state practice, even if such communications urge legislativeofficials to favor or oppose the adoption of a specific pending legislative proposal.41.CERTIFICATION ON CONFLICT OF INTERESTGENERAL REQUIREMENTS41.1.No employee, officer or agent of the SUB-RECIPIENT who is authorized in an official capacity tonegotiate, make, accept or approve, or to take part in negotiating, making, accepting or approving anysubaward, including contracts or subcontracts, in connection with this grant shall have, directly orindirectly, any financial or personal interest in any such subaward. Such a financial or personal interestwould arise when the employee, officer, or agent, any member of his or her immediate family, his or herpartner, or an organization which employs or is about to employ any of the parties indicated herein, has afinancial or personal interest in or a tangible personal benefit from an entity considered for a subaward.41.2.Based on this policy:41.2.1.The SUB-RECIPIENT shall maintain a written code or standards of conduct that provide fordisciplinary actions to be applied for violations of such standards by officers, employees, or agents. Thecode or standards shall provide that the SUB- RECIPIENT’s officers, employees, or agents may neithersolicit nor accept gratuities, favors, or anything of monetary value from present or potential sub-awardees, including contractors or parties to subcontracts and establish penalties, sanctions or otherdisciplinary actions for violations, as permitted by State or local law or regulation.41.2.2.The SUB-RECIPIENT shall maintain responsibility to enforce the requirements of the written codeor standards of conduct.DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS41.3.No SUB-RECIPIENT, including its officers, employees or agents, shall perform or continue toperform under a grant or cooperative agreement, whose objectivity may be impaired because of anyrelated past, present, or currently planned interest, financial or otherwise, in organizations regulated byNHTSA or in organizations whose interests may be substantially affected by NHTSA activities.41.3.1.The SUB-RECIPIENT shall disclose any conflict of interest identified as soon as reasonablypossible, making an immediate and full disclosure in writing to WTSC. The disclosure shall include aPage 19 of 21
Item 8.7
Packet pg. 251/524
Item 8.7
Packet pg. 251/524
description of the action which the recipient has taken or proposes to take to avoid or mitigate suchconflict.41.3.2.NHTSA will review the disclosure and may require additional relevant information from therecipient. If a conflict of interest is found to exist, NHTSA may (a) terminate the award, or (b) determinethat it is otherwise in the best interest of NHTSA to continue the award and include appropriateprovisions to mitigate or avoid such conflict.41.3.3.Conflicts of interest that require disclosure include all past, present or currently plannedorganizational, financial, contractual or other interest(s) with an organization regulated by NHTSA or withan organization whose interests may be substantially affected by NHTSA activities, and which are relatedto this award. The interest(s) that require disclosure include those of any SUB-RECIPIENT, affiliate,proposed consultant, proposed subcontractor and key personnel of any of the above. Past interest shallbe limited to within one year of the date of award. Key personnel shall include any person owning morethan a 20 percent interest in a SUB-RECIPIENT, and the officers, employees or agents of a recipient whoare responsible for making a decision or taking an action under an award where the decision or actioncan have an economic or other impact on the interests of a regulated or affected organization.42.DESIGNATED CONTACTSThe following named individuals will serve as designated contacts for each of the parties for allcommunications, notices, and reimbursements regarding this Agreement:
The Contact for the SUB- RECIPIENT is:The Contact for WTSC is:Josh HwangSpecial Operations Sergeantjosh.hwang@edmondswa.gov425-361-6492 Mark MedalenWTSC Program Managermmedalen@wtsc.wa.gov360-725-9878
AUTHORITY TO SIGNThe undersigned acknowledge that they are authorized to execute this Agreement and bind theirrespective agencies or entities to the obligations set forth herein.IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement.SUB-RECIPIENT:
Page 20 of 21
Item 8.7
Packet pg. 252/524
Item 8.7
Packet pg. 252/524
______________________________Signature
Mike Rosen______________________________Printed Name Mayor______________________________Title ______________________________Date
WASHINGTON TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSIONName: Wade AlonzoTitle: Division Director
______________________________Date
Page 21 of 21
Item 8.7
Packet pg. 253/524
Item 8.7
Packet pg. 253/524
1
0
7
4
Agenda Item 8.8
Edmonds City Council
Regular Meeting
October 27, 2026
TITLE:Washington Traffic Safety Commission DRE Memorandum of
Understanding (Only One Reading Required)
DEPARTMENT:Police Services
PRESENTER:Chief Loi Dawkins
NEEDED FROM COUNCIL:Action
RECOMMENDATION:Approve the attached MOU, enabling the Edmonds Police
Department to receive reimbursement from the WTSC for Police
Officers certified as Drug Recognition Experts (DRE) that respond
to allied agency requests (callouts)
BUDGET:
Total Dollar Amount:0.00 ☐ Approved in Budget
Fund(s):General Fund ☐ Budget Reallocation Required
☒ No Budget Impact
PROBLEM/ISSUE STATEMENT:
For 2026-2027, the Police Department requests that this agreement be approved so that the
Edmonds Police Department may receive reimbursement from the WTSC for Police Officers
certified as Drug Recognition Experts (DRE) that respond to allied agency requests (callouts).
CONTEXT, ANALYSIS, & ALTERNATIVES:
This Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) provides funding from the Washington Traffic
Safety Commission (WTSC) to Edmonds Police Department from July 1, 2025, through June 30,
2027.
It reimburses overtime costs for certified Drug Recognition Experts (DREs) to:
Respond in person to callouts when no on-duty DRE is available.
Extend shifts to complete assessments and reports.
Testify in court regarding funded DRE callouts/extensions.
Participate in pre-approved emphasis patrols, training, or instruction.
BUDGET IMPACTS:
This agreement with WTSC will have no negative budget impact on the City, as it will
compensate the Police Department for overtime incurred for DRE-certified officers on allied
agency callouts.
ITEM HISTORY:
N/A
Item 8.8
Packet pg. 254/524
Item 8.8
Packet pg. 254/524
1
0
7
4
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
ATTACHMENTS:
WTSC Memorandum of Understanding
Item 8.8
Packet pg. 255/524
Item 8.8
Packet pg. 255/524
MOU DRE Program 2025-2027 (05/2025) page 1 of 2
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
WASHINGTON TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION 621 8th Ave SE, Suite 409, PO Box 40944, Olympia WA 98504-0944 THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into by and between: _________________________________________________________________________ (Agency Name)
Hereinafter referred to as “CONTRACTOR” and the WASHINGTON TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION, hereinafter referred to as “WTSC.”
IT IS THE PURPOSE OF THIS AGREEMENT to provide overtime funding to law enforcement agencies who have certified Drug Recognition Experts (DRE) to conduct the following activities:
• Respond in person to the allied agency requests for DRE assessments when no on-duty DRE is available. Phone calls are not considered a “response” to an agency request and therefore overtime cannot be incurred.
• Cover shift extension ‘overtime’ when completing a DRE assessment and report.
• Court testimony resulting from performing DRE assessments/report associated call outs and shift extensions when overtime is required. (This MOU and associated grant funding do not cover overtime costs incurred from cases/arrests made during normal employment or assignment.)
• On an overtime basis, participate in duties as a DRE during emphasis patrols (when no HVE funding is available), allied agency DRE-related requests, or other DRE programs such as teaching and training deemed necessary and pre-approved by the Washington State DRE Coordinator between July 1, 2025, through June 30, 2027. IT IS, THEREFORE, MUTUALLY AGREED THAT: 1. All contractor DREs will be available for callout by Washington State Patrol (WSP) communications in their individual regions. WSP Communications will be notified of the DRE’s availability when that DRE signs into regular duty with their respective allied agency. As part of this agreement, contractor DREs are responsible for ensuring the Drug
Evaluation Classification (DEC) Program has their correct contact information for use in the DRE callout system. 2. Contractor will provide a certified DRE on an “overtime” basis (not to exceed 1.5 times contracted salary and allowable benefits, even during paid holiday) to perform DRE activities as specified. No other commissioned personnel will be funded. 3. WTSC will pay minimum overtime hours per individual agency’s Collective Bargaining
Agreement (CBA). 4. The period of activity will begin on July 1, 2025 and extend through June 30, 2027. 5. Drug evaluation performance standards for certified and funded DREs must meet the standards of the International Association of Chiefs of Police (IACP). 6. DREs will maintain good standing with DEC Program, i.e. paperwork, rolling logs, and resumes. (Contractor and DRE will be notified by the DEC Program if DRE is not eligible for availability and removed from WSP roster -30-day notice given.) 7. Either party may terminate this agreement upon (30 days) written notice to the other party. In the event of termination of this agreement, the terminating party shall be liable for the performance rendered prior to the effective date of termination.
Item 8.8
Packet pg. 256/524
Item 8.8
Packet pg. 256/524
MOU DRE Program 2025-2027 (05/2025) page 2 of 2
8. WTSC Termination – This project agreement may be terminated or fund payments discontinued or reduced by WTSC at any time upon written notice to the Contractor due to
non-availability of funds, failure of the Contractor to accomplish any of the terms herein, or from any pre-approved changes in the scope or timing of the project. 9. The WTSC will monitor and track the availability of DRE Callout funds. FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY: 1. The CONTRACTOR will seek prior written approval from the WTSC for any single invoice for DRE overtime activities projected to exceed $3,000. 2. Effective July 1, 2025, all contractors invoicing and supporting documentation must be submitted through the WEMS invoicing system. Training and additional information on this process are available upon request from WTSC. Invoices must be submitted no more than 30 days after the last day of the month in which overtime is worked. Invoicing and
supporting documents submitted later than the 30-day deadline will not normally be considered for payment but may be considered on a case-by-case basis. The contractor must ensure that any reimbursement being requested is only for call-out and shift extension
overtime. The CONTRACTOR will NOT seek reimbursement for on-duty time. Invoicing will include:
• A complete and signed invoice Voucher, A19 Form that includes the contracting agency identified as the “Claimant”, Federal Tax ID #, agency Statewide vendor # (SWV#) and an original signature of the supervising officer or payroll/finance.
• Payment documentation including overtime slips, payroll records, timekeeping reports, receipts, and any other supporting financial documentation.
• DRE Request Form showing all pertinent information. For court cases, include proof with the A-19 that the payment relates to a prior MOU overtime agreement.
• Failure to submit complete documentation or use the WEMS invoicing system may result in delayed processing or payment of invoices.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, PARTIES HAVE EXECUTED THIS AGREEMENT. APPROVED/DISAPPROVED _________________________________________________________________________________ (Agency) (Date) Washington Traffic Safety Commission (Date) _____________________________________________ Contracting Agent Title & NAME (print/type name) _____________________________________ (Signature) Please return this signed form by email to: Penny Rarick prarick@wtsc.wa.gov Washington Traffic Safety Commission Attn: Penny Rarick PO Box 40944 Olympia, WA 98504
Item 8.8
Packet pg. 257/524
Item 8.8
Packet pg. 257/524
1
0
7
6
Agenda Item 8.9
Edmonds City Council
Regular Meeting
October 27, 2026
TITLE:Approval of Amendment to Professional Services Agreement for
Yost & Seaview Reservoirs Project (Second Reading)
DEPARTMENT:Engineering
PRESENTER:Mike De Lilla
NEEDED FROM COUNCIL:Action
RECOMMENDATION:Move to approve the amendment to the Professional Services
Agreement with Consor North America, Inc. to increase the
agreement amount by $120,543 for a total contractual amount
of $797,118.
BUDGET:
Total Dollar Amount:$797,118 ☒ Approved in Budget
Fund(s):421 ☐ Budget Reallocation Required
☐ No Budget Impact
PROBLEM/ISSUE STATEMENT:
The City’s Yost and Seaview Reservoirs are existing water system facilities that require
structural repairs, rehabilitation, and upgrades to maintain the long-term reliability and
functionality of the City’s water storage system. The Yost and Seaview Reservoirs Repairs and
Upgrades project was developed to address identified structural and operation needs at both
facilities, as well as improvements to the surrounding reservoir sites.
The City entered into a Professional Services Agreement with Consor North America, Inc.
(formerly Murraysmith) to provide engineering design services for the project. With
construction anticipated to begin in November 2026, additional professional engineering
services are necessary to support the City during construction.
The proposed amendment will increase the existing Professional Services Agreement by
$120,543 to provide engineering support services during construction, resulting in a revised
total contract amount of $797,118.
CONTEXT, ANALYSIS, & ALTERNATIVES:
The project includes repairs and rehabilitation of the existing Yost and Seaview reservoirs and
improvements to the areas surrounding each reservoir. Reservoir improvements include
structural retrofits using fiber reinforced polymer (FRP) reinforcement, updates to reservoir
appurtenances, repairs to cracks and joints in the reservoir structures, and replacement of inlet
piping. Improvements to the surrounding sites include pickleball sport court resurfacing, site
Item 8.9
Packet pg. 258/524
Item 8.9
Packet pg. 258/524
1
0
7
6
drainage improvements, ADA accessibility upgrades, and replacement of valves, piping, and
other appurtenances located outside the reservoir structures.
On September 8, 2026, City Council approved the award of the construction contract to
Combined Construction in the amount of $7,753,129.12. Construction is anticipated to begin in
November 2026, with work at the Yost Reservoir occurring first, followed by the Seaview
Reservoir during the subsequent construction season.
The City entered into the original Professional Services Agreement with Consor North America,
Inc. on June 23, 2022, in the amount of $253,941. The agreement was subsequently amended
on October 20, 2023, increasing the contract amount by $422,634 to a total of $676,575.
During construction, the City anticipates the need for continued involvement from the design
consultant to address technical questions, review contractor submittals, evaluate unforeseen
field conditions, and provide other engineering support as necessary.
The proposed amendment will provide additional funding for engineering support services
during construction. These services are intended to assist City staff with technical evaluations
and help ensure construction activities are completed in accordance with the approved project
plans and specifications.
BUDGET IMPACTS:
The project is funded through the City’s Water Utility Fund 421. The original Professional
Services Agreement with Consor North America, Inc. was executed in the amount of $253,941.
Amendment No. 1 increased the contract amount by $422,634, resulting in a current
authorized contract total of $676,575. The proposed Amendment No. 2 will increase the
existing agreement by $120,543 to provide engineering support services during construction,
resulting in a revised total contract amount of $797,118.
ITEM HISTORY:
•June 23, 2022: Original Professional Services Agreement with Consor North America, Inc.
(formerly Murraysmith) executed in the amount of $253,941.
•October 20, 2023: Amendment No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement executed,
increasing the contract amount by $422,634.
•August 18, 2026: City Council received preliminary bid results for the Yost & Seaview
Reservoirs Repairs and Upgrades project. Combined Construction was identified as the
apparent low bidder.
•September 8, 2026: City Council approved the award of the construction contract to
Combined Construction in the amount of $7,753,129.12.
•October 20, 2026: At the Parks and Public Works Committee, staff presented
Amendment 2 to PSA with Consor to increase the contract amount by $120,543.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1 – Professional Services Agreement Amendment and Scope & Fee
Attachment 2 – Project Budget
Item 8.9
Packet pg. 259/524
Item 8.9
Packet pg. 259/524
\\edmsvr-deptfs\Engineering\Capital\CAPITAL PROJECTS\ME21WT02 Yost and Seaview Reservoir Repairs and Upgrades\Design\200 Genl Administration\210 Consultant Agreements\E22JB.Consor PSA Amendment No 2 10.6.2026.docx
AMENDMENT NO. 2
TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
Yost and Seaview Reservoirs Repairs and Upgrades
WHEREAS, the City of Edmonds, Washington, hereinafter referred to as the “City,” and
Consor North America Inc. (f/k/a Murraysmith), hereinafter referred to as the “Consultant,”
entered into an underlying agreement for design, engineering, and consulting services with respect
to a project known as Yost and Seaview Reservoirs Repairs and Upgrades project, dated June 23,
2023 (“Underlying Agreement”) and amended on October 20, 2023 (“Amendment No. 1”); and
WHEREAS, additional tasks to the original Scope of Work have been identified with
regard to providing engineering services;
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of mutual benefits accruing, it is agreed by and
between the parties thereto as follows:
1. The Underlying Agreement of June 23, 2023 between the parties, as amended by
Amendment No. 1, both of which are incorporated by this reference as fully as if herein set forth,
is further amended in, but only in, the following respects:
1.2 Scope of Work. The Scope of Work set forth in the Underlying Agreement,
as amended by Amendment No. 1, is hereby further amended to include the additional services
and material necessary to accomplish the stated objectives as outlined in the attached Exhibit A
incorporated by this reference as fully as if herein set forth.
1.3 Payment. The $253,941 amount set forth in paragraph 2A of the Underlying
Agreement, which was increased under Amendment No. 1 by $422,634, and stated as an amount
which shall not be exceeded, is hereby further amended to include an additional not to exceed
amount of $120,543 for the additional scope of work identified in Exhibit A to this Amendment
No. 2. As a result of this Amendment No. 2, the total contract amount is increased to a new total
not-to-exceed amount of $797,118 ($253,941 plus $422,634 plus $120,543).
1.4 Fee Schedule. Exhibit B to the Underlying Agreement consisting of the rate
and cost reimbursement schedule, which was amended by Amendment No. 1, is hereby further
amended to include the form set forth on the attached Exhibit B, incorporated by this reference as
fully as if herein set forth.
Item 8.9
Packet pg. 260/524
Item 8.9
Packet pg. 260/524
\\edmsvr-deptfs\Engineering\Capital\CAPITAL PROJECTS\ME21WT02 Yost and Seaview Reservoir Repairs and Upgrades\Design\200 Genl Administration\210 Consultant Agreements\E22JB.Consor PSA Amendment No 2 10.6.2026.docx
2. In all other respects, the Underlying Agreement between the parties, as amended
by Amendment No. 1, shall remain in full force and effect, further amended as set forth in this
Amendment No. 2 but only as set forth herein.
DONE this day of , 2026.
CITY OF EDMONDS CONSOR NORTH AMERICA, INC.
Mike Rosen, Mayor Lael Alderman, Regional Director, Water
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATE:
________________________________
Luke Lonie, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Office of the City Attorney
Item 8.9
Packet pg. 261/524
Item 8.9
Packet pg. 261/524
\\edmsvr-deptfs\Engineering\Capital\CAPITAL PROJECTS\ME21WT02 Yost and Seaview Reservoir Repairs and Upgrades\Design\200 Genl Administration\210 Consultant Agreements\E22JB.Consor PSA Amendment No 2 10.6.2026.docx
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
)ss
COUNTY OF KING )
On this day of , 2026, before me, the undersigned, a Notary
Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared
Lael Alderman, to me known to be the Regional Director, Water of the corporation that
executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and
voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on
oath stated that he/she was authorized to execute said instrument and that the seal affixed is the
corporate seal of said corporation.
WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year first above
written.
NOTARY PUBLIC
My commission expires:
Item 8.9
Packet pg. 262/524
Item 8.9
Packet pg. 262/524
Consor • October 2026 • City of Edmonds
Yost & Seaview Reservoir Repairs & Upgrades • 1
EXHIBIT A
SCOPE OF SERVICES
YOST AND SEAVIEW RESERVOIR REPAIRS AND
UPGRADES
PHASE 3 – CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT
CITY OF EDMONDS
Project Overview and Understanding
Consor North America, Inc. (Consor, Consultant) has developed the following Scope of Services and
accompanying fee estimate to provide construction support services for the City of Edmonds (City) Yost
and Seaview Reservoirs Repairs and Upgrades project. The scope and the fee have been developed based
on discussions with City staff and our understanding of the project from the previously completed tasks in
Phases 1 and 2.
Scope of Services
The Scope of Services includes the following work tasks.
Task 1 – Project Management
Task 7 - Unanticipated Task Reserve
Task 8 – Construction Support Services
Detailed descriptions of each major work task follow.
Task 1 - Project Management
Objective
Coordinate, monitor, and control the project resources to meet the technical, communication, and
contractual obligations required for developing and implementing the project scope.
1.01 Invoices and Progress Reports
Prepare and submit electronic monthly invoices for review and approval by the City. Each invoice will
include the following information.
Billing period (start and end date) included in the invoice
Description of work accomplished for the billing period
Name, billing rate and hours for each resource that worked on each task
Percent spent (by task if appropriate to the project)
Documentation of potential out-of-scope work items
Item 8.9
Packet pg. 263/524
Item 8.9
Packet pg. 263/524
Consor • October 2026 • City of Edmonds
Yost & Seaview Reservoir Repairs & Upgrades • 2
N202967WA 01 A02_City of Edmonds WA_Scope_09-10-2026 (1) (002)
1.02 Project Team Management
Consor’s Project Manager will manage project staff and subconsultants in conformance with the scope of
services, fee estimate, and schedule.
Task Deliverables
Monthly invoices and progress reports.
Assumptions
Consultant assumes a Notice to Proceed date in October 2026.
The total length of this phase of the project is estimated to be up to twelve (12) months total, with a
suspension of the project between April 2027 and September 2027 as construction is paused.
Potential out-of-scope work will not be performed without written approval by the City.
Tasks 2 through 6
No changes to the services in the original Contract
Task 7 – Unanticipated Task Reserve (As Needed)
A reserve budget amount has been included in the fee estimate for work under this task, which may include
additional unanticipated work not specifically identified in the scope of work tasks defined above. Such
work items will be undertaken only after written authorization from the City.
Task 8 – Construction Support Services
Objective
Assist the City with construction management of reservoir rehabilitation and upgrades. The Consultant’s
primary roles will be as generally follows:
Attend Preconstruction Conference and certain virtual construction meetings as approved or notified
by the City.
Perform technical document review.
Clarify plans and specifications as needs arise.
Perform specialty observations
Task 8.01 Preconstruction Conference
Prepare for and attend preconstruction conference. Consultant will assist with preparation of meeting
agenda and will provide support to the City. Consultant’s Project Manager will attend.
Task 8.02 Virtual Construction Meetings
Attend up to twenty-four (24) construction meetings through a virtual platform on an as-needed basis. The
purpose of these meetings is to identify potential issues and review project progress. Typically, Consultant’s
Project Manager and/or technical expert will attend these meetings alongside the Contractor’s Project
Manager and primary City representatives.
Item 8.9
Packet pg. 264/524
Item 8.9
Packet pg. 264/524
Consor • September 2026 • City of Edmonds
Yost & Seaview Reservoir Repairs & Upgrades • 3
N202967WA 01 A02_City of Edmonds WA_Scope_09-10-2026 (1) (002)
Task 8.03 – Review Shop Drawings and Submittals
Consultant will review and respond to up to twenty (20) contractor submittals (including re-submittals) for
materials and shop drawings related to site work items, reservoir appurtenances, and other submittals as
specified in the Contract Documents. The City will be the primary reviewer of submittals, with the
Consultant providing submittal reviews upon request.
Task 8.04 – Respond to Requests for Information (RFI’s)
Consultant will respond to up to ten (10) RFI’s. The City will be the primary responder of RFIs for the project,
with Consultant responding to RFIs as requested by the City.
Task 8.05 – Construction Observation
Consultant will support the City’s daily on-site construction observations and coordination by conducting
periodic on-site construction observation services (five total site visits allotted, four hours per visit) by
Consultant design team staff. The on-site representative will provide periodic monitoring of the
construction work as requested by City staff. The representative will prepare written reports on the
construction activities at the site during such visits, documenting activities, decisions, discussions with the
contractor and other observations; document the construction work by photograph and/or video; witness
testing as may be necessary; and other related work as needed. It is anticipated that the Consultant
observations will occur to review various site improvements and reservoir elements.
Task 8.06 – Record Drawings
Consultant will prepare record drawings based upon Consultant observations made during site visits, and
Contractor and City field inspector redlines. Record drawings will be prepared in AutoCAD format using the
version of AutoCAD Civil 3D used during Phase 2.
Task 8.07 –Structural Engineering Support
Peterson Structural Engineering (Peterson) provide structural engineering services during construction. A
more detailed scope of work for structural engineering support during construction can be found in Exhibit
C.
Task 8 Deliverables (all electronic only)
Submittal reviews (MS Word and/or PDF)
Responses to RFI’s (MS Word and/or PDF)
Construction observation reports (MS Word and/or PDF)
Record drawings (PDF and .dwg)
Task 8 Assumptions
The Preconstruction Conference will occur virtually.
Up to three (3) hours is budgeted for each submittal review, with six (6) additional hours included for
review by a technical specialist.
Up to four (4) hours is budgeted for each RFI review, with six (6) additional hours included for review
by a technical specialist.
The City will lead the regular construction meetings, with Consultant in attendance virtually for
technical assistance and interpretation of Contract Documents at the City’s request. These meetings
are assumed to be one hour in duration.
Item 8.9
Packet pg. 265/524
Item 8.9
Packet pg. 265/524
Consor • October 2026 • City of Edmonds
Yost & Seaview Reservoir Repairs & Upgrades • 4
N202967WA 01 A02_City of Edmonds WA_Scope_09-10-2026 (1) (002)
Each construction observation assumes 30 miles of round-trip travel, for a total of 150 miles with five
construction observations. With an assumed mileage fee of $0.725 per mile, this comes to a total of
$109 for travel expenses. The mileage invoiced will be based on current mileage rates and actual
miles traveled.
The City will provide day-to-day field oversight throughout the construction process.
The City will lead the construction management effort, including contract oversight, processing all
contractor pay application, and change order management.
Out of scope work will not be performed without written approval by the City.
Fee Estimate
Work will be performed on a time and expense basis with a total not to exceed amount as shown on the
attached Fee Estimate (Exhibit B). A 5% escalation has been added to 50% of the fee to account for work
completed in 2027.
Item 8.9
Packet pg. 266/524
Item 8.9
Packet pg. 266/524
YOST AND SEAVIEW RESERVOIR REPAIRS AND UPGRADES
PHASE 3 - CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT
CITY OF EDMONDS
PROPOSED FEE ESTIMATE
LABOR CLASSIFICATION (HOURS)
Principal Engineer
VI
Professional
Engineer VIII
Engineering
Designer II Technician III
Project
Coordinator IV Hours Labor Structural Expenses Total
$384 $269 $197 $192 $204
Task 1 - Project Management
Task 1.01 - Invoices and Progress Reports 4 12 6 22 6,134$ -$ 6,134$
Task 1.02 - Project Team Management 4 24 6 34 9,440$ -$ 9,440$
Task 1 Subtotal 8 36 0 0 12 56 15,575$ -$ -$ 15,575$
Task 7 - Unanticipated Task Reserve
Task 7.01 - Unanticipated Task Reserve (As Needed)0 -$ 10,000$ 10,000$
Task 7 Subtotal 0 0 0 0 0 0 -$ -$ 10,000$ 10,000$
Task 8 - Construction Support Services
Task 8.01 - Preconstruction Conference 4 4 1,102$ -$ 1,102$
Task 8.02 - Virtual Construction Meetings 6 24 30 8,975$ -$ 8,975$
Task 8.03 - Review Shop Drawings and Submittals 6 20 40 66 15,950$ -$ 15,950$
Task 8.04 - Respond to Requests for Information (RFI’s)6 20 20 46 11,912$ -$ 11,912$
Task 8.05 - Construction Observation 20 20 5,510$ 109$ 5,619$
Task 8.06 - Record Drawings 10 24 30 64 13,510$ 540$ 14,050$
Task 8.07 - Structural Engineering Support 0 -$ 36,860$ 500$ 37,360$
Task 8 Subtotal 18 98 84 30 0 230 56,960$ 36,860$ 1,149$ 94,968$
TOTAL - ALL TASKS 26 134 84 30 12 286 72,534$ 36,860$ 11,149$ 120,543$
Subconsultants
City of Edmonds
October 2026
https://us-partner-integrations.egnyte.com/msoffice/wopi/files/e836cd73-8c08-46a0-8c58-a64c717fd2ee/WOPIServiceId_TP_EGNYTE_PLUS/WOPIUserId_-/Exh B - Fee Estimate Yost & Seaview Reservoirs Construction Support
Consor
Yost and Seaview Reservoir Repairs and Upgrades
Page 1
Item 8.9
Packet pg. 267/524
Item 8.9
Packet pg. 267/524
October 15, 2026
Greg Postlewaite
Consor
600 University Way #300
Seattle WA 98101 Project #: 1902-0002
RE: Edmonds Yost and Seaview Reservoir Retrofit Design – Scope and Fee Proposal
Construction Services
Dear Greg,
Thank you for the opportunity to provide structural engineering services during construction at the Yost and
Seaview Reservoir improvements in Edmonds, WA. The services outlined here are a continuation of PSE’s work
during the design phase for the retrofits to the Yost and Seaview Reservoirs. Services listed also include special
inspections to be performed by Intertek PSI
Proposed Project Scope
PSE proposes the following scope of work:
1. Construction Submittal – Up to (45) hours for review and response to construction submittals
2. Construction RFIs – Up to (55) hours for review and response to construction RFIs
3. Structural Observations – (2) On site structural observations to be performed by PSE and generation of
associated structural observation reports.
Item 8.9
Packet pg. 268/524
Item 8.9
Packet pg. 268/524
Edmonds Yost and Seaview Reservoir Retrofit Design – Scope and Fee Proposal
Proposed Fee & Schedule
Based upon the scope above, we have generated a fee estimate as follows:
•• Mileage
Location No. of Trips Miles Total Miles
Meeting/Site Visit 2 125 (round trip) 250
Total Miles 250
Total Cost at $0.725 per mile $180*
* Each construction observation assumed 125 miles of round-trip travel, for a total of 250 miles
with two construction observations. With an assumed mileage fee of $0.725 per mile, this comes
to a total of $180 for travel expenses. The mileage invoiced will be based on current mileage
rates and actual miles traveled.
•• Task Items 1-4: $36,680 with estimated project expenses of $180, for a total of $36,860
Payments may be made by ACH, check, or credit card. Credit card payments will incur a 3% processing fee.
Invoices will be submitted at the beginning of the month for structural services performed in the previous month.
Should revisions to this scope and fee proposal be affected by pending information or scope changes, we will
apprise you of that situation before proceeding. Please note that the fee stated above is based solely on an
estimate of the time to be expended to complete the scope items defined above. Changes or additions to the
defined scope could result in additional fees. PSE will require an amended PO/TO or alternate client official
notification before beginning work on design changes or modifications.
Sincerely,
10/15/2026
Greg Lewis, PE Date
Senior Engineer
Peterson Structural Engineers, Inc.
Item 8.9
Packet pg. 269/524
Item 8.9
Packet pg. 269/524
Yost & Seaview Reservoirs Repairs and Upgrades
Proposed Construction Budget
Description Amount
Contract Award 7,753,129.12$
Contract Award Management Reserve (10%)775,312.91$
Construction Management, Inspection & Testing (10%)775,312.91$
Total =9,303,754.94$
Funding Amount
Water Fund 9,303,754.94$
Total =9,303,754.94$
Construction Funding
Item 8.9
Packet pg. 270/524
Item 8.9
Packet pg. 270/524
1
0
6
7
Agenda Item 9.1
Edmonds City Council
Regular Meeting
October 27, 2026
TITLE:Public Hearing for 2027 - 2032 Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) and
Capital Improvement Program (CIP) (Second Reading)
DEPARTMENT:Public Works and Utilities
PRESENTER:Mike De Lilla/Angie Feser/Andy Rheaume
NEEDED FROM COUNCIL:Action
RECOMMENDATION:Staff recommends City Council conduct a Public Hearing for the
2027 – 2032 Capital Facilities Plan and Capital Improvement
Program for the city’s Public Works and Parks & Recreation
departments to provide an opportunity for community
engagement and input, gather additional information from city
staff and prepare for the upcoming adoption consideration
slated for December 8th Council meeting.
BUDGET:
Total Dollar Amount:n/a ☐ Approved in Budget
Fund(s):n/a ☐ Budget Reallocation Required
☒ No Budget Impact
PROBLEM/ISSUE STATEMENT:
The City’s Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) and Capital Improvement Program (CIP) are reviewed and
approved by City Council on an annual basis and this needs to be completed by the of 2026.
This process includes a presentation, Public Hearing and approval during three different council
meetings to allow for public input and council consideration.
CONTEXT, ANALYSIS, & ALTERNATIVES:
The City of Edmonds Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) is a key planning document that guides how
the city plans for growth. Updated and adopted at least every two years, it's a six-year plan that
identifies capital projects that expand or create new facilities and infrastructure to support the
city's projected population growth. This plan is different from the Capital Improvement
Program (CIP), which includes projects to preserve existing facilities. Both the CFP and the
preservation projects from the CIP are part of a single six-year document that outlines all
projected timelines, expenditures and funding sources for the city's capital projects.
The Public Works and the Parks and Recreation departments are responsible for developing,
implementing and managing their capital programs and projects. The proposed CIP/CFP
projects, which are prioritized in the Water, Sewer, Storm, Transportation Comprehensive Plans
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 271/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 271/524
and the Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan are reflected in their respective capital plans.
The complete capital documents are included in this agenda packet. Both attachments contain
lists, detailed information sheets, funding sources and estimated costs for all projects.
Annually, these capital programs, plans and projects undergo a comprehensive public review
process. The city's Planning Board had a full, detailed presentation on September 9, 2026,
including questions and answer period with city staff. September 23, 2026, the Planning Board
conducted a Public Hearing and in October, the board finalized their formal recommendation to
the city council.
BUDGET IMPACTS:
These six-year capital plans and programs are fundamentally planning documents with
estimated cost expenditures and related funding sources. Approval of the documents is not
necessarily approving the projects expenditures as that is accomplished using a Decision
Package mechanism during the Council’s adoption of the city budget. In addition, specific
project expenditures are authorized through the city’s Purchasing Policy procedures.
ITEM HISTORY:
September 9, 2026 – presented to Planning Board
September 23, 2026 – Planning Board conducted a Public Hearing
October 14, 2026 – presented to City Council at Study Session
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
The next step in Council’s consideration for adoption is Public Hearing scheduled for October
27, 2026, with adoption consideration by Council scheduled for November 24, 2026. The Public
Hearing presentation by staff will be a brief summary of the capital programs, an opportunity
for public comments as well as opportunity for questions and answers with Council and staff.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1 – Public Works CIP/CFP
Attachment 2 – Parks CIP/CFP
Attachment 3 – Planning Board Memo
CITY OF EDMONDS
PUBLIC WORKS
PROPOSED 2027-2032
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN &
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 273/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 273/524
2027-2032 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM
5
11
23
45
PRESERVATION/ MAINTENANCE
SAFETY/ CAPACITY ANALYSIS
NON-MOTORIZED
TRANSPORTATION FERRY RELATED
TRAFFIC CALMING
TRAFFIC PLANNING
82
93 WATER
STORMWATER 98
112
118
134
CONTENTS
84
86
106
102 EDMONDS MARSH ESTUARY RESTORATION
PERRINVILLE CREEK BASIN
COMPLIANCE RELATED 110
SEWER
FACILITIES
WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
CFP/CIP COMPARISON 2026-2027 159
3 TRANSPORTATION AND UTILITY MAP
FACILITIES AND WWTP MAP
TRANSPORTATION
4
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 274/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 274/524
î
î
î
î
î
î
îî
î
î
î
î
î
î
î
î
î
î
î
î
î
î
îPWS-02
PWS-02
PWD-01
PWD-04
PWD-03
PWD-17
PWD-23
PWD-05PWD-28
PWT-05
PWT-06
PWT-07
PWT-17
PWT-18
PWT-19
PWT-21
PWT-22
PWT-23
PWT-24
PWT-43
PWT-28
PWT-06 PWT-01
PWT-52
PWT-52
PWT-106
PWT-106 PWW-11
PWW-11
PWW-02PWW-02PWT-65
PWT-69
PWT-64
PWT-16
PWT-99
PWT-15
PWT-13
PWT-12
PWT-105
PWT-11
PWT-04
PWT-51
PWT-10
PWT-14
PWT-101
PWT-68 PWT-03
PWT-08
PWT-61
PWT-20
PWT-25
PWT-09
PWT-100
PWT-37
PWT-87
PWT-48
PWT-49
PWT-36
PWT-55
PWT-91
PWT-93
PWT-89
PWT-79
PWT-96
PWT-32
PWT-42
PWT-41
PWT-46
PWT-102
PWT-73
PWT-31PWT-86
PWT-85
PWT-33
PWT-47
PWT-75
PWT-30
PWT-50
PWT-77
PWT-88PWT-35
PWT-40
PWT-29PWT-90
PWT-80
PWT-76
PWT-81
PWT-34
PWT-92
PWT-84
PWT-71
PWT-45
PWT-78
PWT-83
PWT-74
PWT-72
PWS-11
¯
September 2026
Public Works & Utilities Department
TRANSPORTATION &
UTILITY PROJECTS MAP
* Site specific projects only. Citywide/annual citywide projects not shown.
Projects
Sewer
Stormwater
Street/Intersection Project
Non-Motorized Transportation Project
WaterSewer
î Street/Intersection Project
Non-Motorized Transportation Project
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 275/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 275/524
PWF-02
PWF-03PWF-04 PWF-05PWF-09 PWF-11
PWF-16
PWF-16
PWF-17
PWF-18PWF-23PWF-13
PWF-14
PWF-15 PWF-25
PWP-04PWP-06
PWP-01 PWP-08PWP-10PWP-11PWP-13PWP-14PWP-16PWP-18PWP-19PWP-20PWP-21PWP-22PWP-23PWP-24PWP-25PWP-26PWP-27PWP-28PWP-29PWP-30
¯
September 2026
Public Works & Utilities Department
FACILITIES &
WWTP PROJECTS MAP
* Site specific projects only. Citywide/annual citywide projects not shown.
Projects
Facilities
WWTP
PWP-29PWP-30
PWF-01
PWF-03
PWF-05
PWF-07
PWF-09
PWF-10
PWF-11
PWF-16
PWF-23
PWF-13
PWF-15
PWF-27
PWF-25PWP-04
PWP-28
PWP-06
PWP-27
PWP-01
PWP-08PWP-09PWP-10PWP-11PWP-12PWP-13PWP-14PWP-15PWP-16PWP-17
PWP-18PWP-19PWP-20PWP-21PWP-22PWP-23PWP-24PWP-25PWP-26
4t
h
A
v
e
S
4th
A
v
e
N
6th
A
v
e
S
7t
h
A
v
e
N
Walnut St
2nd
A
v
e
N
2n
d
A
v
e
S
7t
h
A
v
e
S
Bell
S
t
6t
h
A
v
e
S
Bell St
Sprague St
Edmonds St
Bell
S
t
Dayton St
Mai
n
S
t
Maple St
Alder St
Dayton St
Walnut St
MAIN
S
T
5T
H
A
V
E
S
3RD
AVE
S
WMAIN
ST
MAIN ST
3RD
A
V
E
N
ED
M
O
N
D
S
W
A
Y
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 276/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 276/524
TRANSPORTATION
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 5
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 277/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 277/524
TRANSPORTATION SEPTEMBER 2026 DRAFT 1.4
#CFP Project 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032
2027-32
Total 2033-47 Grand Total
PRESERVATION/ MAINTENANCE
PWT-01 Annual Street Preservation Program $2,630,000 $2,630,000 $2,630,000 $2,630,000 $2,630,000 $2,630,000 $15,780,000 $39,450,000 $55,230,000
PWT-04 Main St Overlay from 6th Ave to 8th Ave $20,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $20,000 $0 $20,000
PWT-05 Puget Dr @ OVD Signal Upgrades $0 $0 $0 $104,000 $575,000 $0 $679,000 $0 $679,000
PWT-06 Signal Upgrades - 100th Ave @ 238th St SW $0 $0 $0 $192,000 $896,000 $0 $1,088,000 $0 $1,088,000
PWT-07 Main St @ 3rd Signal Upgrades $0 $0 $0 $128,000 $444,000 $0 $572,000 $0 $572,000
PWT-28 175th St SW Slope Repair $0 $0 $0 $174,000 $1,155,000 $0 $1,329,000 $0 $1,329,000
PWT-61 Olympic View Dr Overlay - 196th / SR-524 to
Talbot Rd $1,831,000 $6,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,837,000 $0 $1,837,000
PWT-68 88th Avenue Overlay and Sidewalk Repair $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,000 $0 $10,000
PWT-69 7th Avenue Sidewalk Repair $0 $0 $0 $159,000 $668,000 $0 $827,000 $0 $827,000
PWT-103 P 7th Ave N Pedestrian Improvements $2,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,000 $0 $2,000
PWT-104 76th Ave W Overlay from 220th St SW to SR-
99 $150,000 $868,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,018,000 $0 $1,018,000
SAFETY/ CAPACITY ANALYSIS
PWT-08 228th St SW from Hwy 99 to 95th Pl W
Corridor $0 $0 $0 $3,180,000 $4,770,000 $9,540,000 $17,490,000 $9,500,000 $26,990,000
PWT-10 P Hwy 99 Revitalization Project - Stage 3 $5,109,659 $1,754,000 $10,000,000 $9,607,000 $0 $0 $26,470,659 $0 $26,470,659
PWT-11 P Hwy 99 Revitalization Project - Stage 4 $3,528,140 $7,430,000 $1,880,000 $13,100,000 $12,000,000 $0 $37,938,140 $0 $37,938,140
PWT-12 P Hwy 99 Revitalization Project - Stage 5 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000 $500,000 $54,500,000 $55,000,000
PWT-13 P Hwy 99 Revitalization Project - Stage 6 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000 $1,000,000 $1,500,000 $24,000,000 $25,500,000
PWT-14 P Hwy 99 Revitalization Project - Stage 7 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $46,500,000 $46,500,000
6
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 278/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 278/524
TRANSPORTATION SEPTEMBER 2026 DRAFT 1.4
#CFP Project 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032
2027-32
Total 2033-47 Grand Total
PWT-15 P Hwy 99 Revitalization Project - Stage 8 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $43,500,000 $43,500,000
PWT-16 P Hwy 99 Revitalization Project - Stage 9 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,060,000 $1,060,000 $2,120,000 $22,500,000 $24,620,000
PWT-17 P 196th St SW / 88th Ave W Intersection
Improvements $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,590,000 $1,590,000
PWT-18 P Main St @ 9th Ave Intersection Improvements $0 $0 $0 $229,000 $1,255,000 $0 $1,484,000 $0 $1,484,000
PWT-19 P 76th Ave W @ 220th St SW Intersection
Improvements $2,178,000 $1,209,000 $0 $3,370,000 $3,300,000 $0 $10,057,000 $0 $10,057,000
PWT-20 P SR-104 Adaptive System - 236th to 226th $80,000 $0 $0 $4,132,000 $0 $0 $4,212,000 $0 $4,212,000
PWT-21 SR-104 @ 100th Ave W Intersection
Improvements $0 $0 $0 $455,000 $1,431,000 $2,990,000 $4,876,000 $0 $4,876,000
PWT-22 SR-104 @ 95th Pl W Intersection
Improvements $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $318,000 $318,000
PWT-23 P SR-104 @ 238th St SW Intersection
Improvements $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,708,000 $1,708,000
PWT-24 P Olympic View Dr @ 76th Ave W Intersection
Improvements $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,500,000 $1,500,000
PWT-25 P 84th Ave W (212th St SW to 238th St SW)$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $17,800,000 $17,800,000
PWT-43 SR-104 @ 76th Ave W Intersection
Improvements $0 $0 $0 $515,000 $2,304,000 $0 $2,819,000 $0 $2,819,000
PWT-59 Traffic Signal Program $30,280 $30,280 $0 $0 $0 $0 $60,560 $0 $60,560
PWT-97 P 76th Ave W Adaptive System from 206th St
SW to 220th St SW $0 $0 $0 $461,000 $2,613,000 $0 $3,074,000 $0 $3,074,000
PWT-98 Citywide Lighting Improvements $5,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,000 $0 $5,000
NON-MOTORIZED TRANSPORTATION
PWT-29 P 232nd St SW Walkway from 100th Ave to SR-
104 $0 $0 $0 $684,000 $3,874,000 $0 $4,558,000 $0 $4,558,000
PWT-31 P 236th St SW Walkway from Hwy 99 to 76th
Ave W $0 $0 $0 $371,000 $2,014,000 $0 $2,385,000 $0 $2,385,000
PWT-32 P 84th Ave W Walkway from 238th St SW to
234th St SW $0 $0 $0 $159,000 $403,000 $2,332,000 $2,894,000 $0 $2,894,000
7
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 279/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 279/524
TRANSPORTATION SEPTEMBER 2026 DRAFT 1.4
#CFP Project 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032
2027-32
Total 2033-47 Grand Total
PWT-33 P 80th Ave W Walkway from 212th St SW to
206th St SW $0 $0 $0 $0 $456,000 $2,612,000 $3,068,000 $0 $3,068,000
PWT-34 P 80th Ave W Walkway from 188th St SW to
Olympic View Dr $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,678,000 $6,678,000
PWT-35 P 218th St SW Walkway from 76th Ave W to
84th Ave W $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,133,000 $4,133,000
PWT-36 P Walnut St Walkway from 6th Ave S to 7th Ave
S $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $424,000 $424,000
PWT-40 P Maplewood Dr Walkway from Main St to
200th St SW $0 $0 $0 $371,000 $371,000 $4,028,000 $4,770,000 $0 $4,770,000
PWT-43 P SR-104 @ 76th Ave W Non-Motorized
Transportation Improvements $0 $0 $0 $515,000 $2,304,000 $0 $2,819,000 $0 $2,819,000
PWT-45 P SR-104 / Pine S Walkway from HAWK to Pine
/ SR-104 to 9th $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $7,207,000 $7,207,000
PWT-47 P 104th Ave W / Robinhood Ln Walkway from
238th St to 106th Ave W $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,332,000 $2,332,000
PWT-56 P Pedestrian Improvements (2027)$753,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $753,500 $0 $753,500
PWT-60 Pedestrian Safety Program $20,180 $20,180 $0 $0 $0 $0 $40,360 $0 $40,360
PWT-71 P Caspers / 9th Ave N / Puget Multi-Use path
from Admiral Way to Olympic View Dr $0 $0 $0 $1,060,000 $1,060,000 $10,700,000 $12,820,000 $0 $12,820,000
PWT-72 P SR-104 Multi-Use path from 100th Ave W to
Main St $0 $0 $0 $2,650,000 $5,300,000 $21,200,000 $29,150,000 $0 $29,150,000
PWT-73 P 212th St SW Multi-Use path from 74th Ave W
to Hwy 99 $0 $0 $0 $0 $530,000 $1,590,000 $2,120,000 $3,392,000 $5,512,000
PWT-74 P SR-104 Multi-Use path from 100th Ave W to
244th St SW $0 $0 $0 $1,590,000 $2,120,000 $4,240,000 $7,950,000 $16,430,000 $24,380,000
PWT-75 Main St Bike lanes from the Ferry Terminal to
6th Ave $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $9,010,000 $9,010,000
PWT-76 P 240th St SW / 78th Ave W Walkway from Hwy
99 to 236th St SW $0 $0 $0 $318,000 $318,000 $4,150,000 $4,786,000 $0 $4,786,000
PWT-77 P 9th Ave N Bike lanes from Main St to Caspers
St $0 $0 $0 $0 $53,000 $244,000 $297,000 $0 $297,000
PWT-78 P Main St Bike lanes from 9th Ave to 84th Ave
W $0 $0 $0 $118,000 $741,200 $0 $859,200 $0 $859,200
PWT-79 P 238th St SW bike lanes from SR-104 to 84th
Ave W $0 $0 $0 $85,000 $488,000 $0 $573,000 $0 $573,000
8
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 280/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 280/524
TRANSPORTATION SEPTEMBER 2026 DRAFT 1.4
#CFP Project 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032
2027-32
Total 2033-47 Grand Total
PWT-80 P 236th St SW Walkway from 94th Ave W to
84th Ave W $0 $0 $0 $530,000 $2,756,000 $0 $3,286,000 $0 $3,286,000
PWT-81 P Sunset Ave Multi-Use path from Caspers St to
3rd Ave N / SR-104 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,700,000 $5,700,000
PWT-83 P Olympic View Dr Multi-Use path from 76th
Ave W to City Limits $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $19,000,000 $19,000,000
PWT-84 P 196th St SW Multi-Use path from 88th Ave W
to 76th Ave W $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $9,800,000 $9,800,000
PWT-87 P Maple St Walkway from 8th Ave to 9th Ave $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $979,000 $979,000
PWT-88 P 218th St SW Walkway from 84th Ave W to
76th Ave W $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,134,000 $4,134,000
PWT-89 P 88th Ave W Walkway from 200th St SW to
196th St SW $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,279,000 $2,279,000
PWT-91 P Olympic Ave Walkway from Olympic View Dr
to Puget Dr $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,325,000 $1,325,000
PWT-92 P Meadowdale Beach Rd Walkway from 75th Pl
W to Olympic View Dr $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $7,000,000 $7,000,000
PWT-93 P 6th Ave Walkway from Elm Way to Pine St $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,166,000 $1,166,000
PWT-96 P 234th St SW Walkway from Hwy 99 to 76th
Ave W $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,491,000 $2,491,000
PWT-102 P 224th St SW bike lanes from 76th Ave W to
Interurban Trail through re-striping $0 $0 $0 $159,000 $0 $0 $159,000 $0 $159,000
PWT-105 P 7th Ave Walkway from Daley St to SR-524 /
196th St SW $0 $0 $0 $145,000 $908,000 $0 $1,053,000 $0 $1,053,000
PWT-107 Pedestrian Improvements (2028)$345,000 $1,500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,845,000 $0 $1,845,000
FERRY RELATED
PWT-51 Ferry Storage Improvements from Pine St to
Dayton St $0 $0 $0 $66,000 $375,000 $0 $441,000 $0 $441,000
TRAFFIC CALMING
PWT-52 Traffic Calming Program $60,000 $60,000 $60,000 $60,000 $60,000 $60,000 $360,000 $900,000 $1,260,000
TRAFFIC PLANNING
PWT-53 ADA Transition Plan (Right-of-Way) Update $0 $0 $0 $482,000 $0 $0 $482,000 $0 $482,000
9
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 281/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 281/524
TRANSPORTATION SEPTEMBER 2026 DRAFT 1.4
#CFP Project 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032
2027-32
Total 2033-47 Grand Total
PWT-54 Transportation Plan Update $9,634 $0 $0 $0 $477,000 $0 $486,634 $0 $486,634
PWT-99 SR-104 Overpass Feasibility Study $0 $0 $0 $435,000 $0 $0 $435,000 $0 $435,000
PWT-100 Olympic View Dr Active Transportation
Feasibility Study $0 $0 $0 $164,000 $0 $0 $164,000 $0 $164,000
PWT-101 196th St SW Active Transportation Feasibility
Study $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $164,000 $164,000
PWT-106 Feasibility Study Main @ 9th Ave and Walnut
@ 9th Ave $75,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $75,000 $0 $75,000
EXPENSE TOTAL $16,837,393 $15,507,460 $14,570,000 $48,398,000 $60,209,200 $68,876,000 $224,398,053 $367,410,000 $591,808,053
Funding Source 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032
2027-32
Total 2033-47 Grand Total
Federal Grants $6,347,345 $4,790,410 $0 $0 $0 $0 $11,137,755 $0 $11,137,755
Fund 112 - Street (Gas Tax & Multi-Modal) $9,634 $0 $0 $0 $477,000 $0 $486,634 $0 $486,634
Fund 125 - REET $1,788,540 $1,377,000 $750,000 $1,055,300 $914,600 $750,000 $6,635,440 $11,250,000 $17,885,440
Fund 126 - REET $1,868,720 $1,487,460 $810,000 $1,115,300 $974,600 $810,000 $7,066,080 $12,150,000 $19,216,080
State Grants $5,683,859 $7,689,375 $10,000,000 $9,607,000 $0 $0 $32,980,234 $0 $32,980,234
Transportation Impact Fees $1,139,295 $163,215 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,302,510 $0 $1,302,510
Unsecured Funding $0 $0 $3,010,000 $36,340,400 $57,116,000 $67,316,000 $163,782,400 $339,023,000 $502,805,400
Unsecured Grants $0 $0 $0 $280,000 $727,000 $0 $1,007,000 $4,987,000 $5,994,000
FUNDING TOTAL $16,837,393 $15,507,460 $14,570,000 $48,398,000 $60,209,200 $68,876,000 $224,398,053 $367,410,000 $591,808,053
10
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 282/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 282/524
PRESERVATION/MAINTENANCE
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 11
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 283/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 283/524
Maintains the City's pavement infrastructure and reduces the need for larger capital
investment to rebuild City streetsBenefitMaintains the City's pavement infrastructure and reduces the need for larger capital
investment to rebuild City streets
Description Annual pavement preservation program to maintain City streets.
$2.6M per year
ANNUAL STREET
PRESERVATION
PROGRAM
PWT-01
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$130,000 $130,000 $130,000 $130,000Design $130,000 $1,950,000$130,000
$2,500,000 $2,500,000 $2,500,000 $2,500,000Construction $2,500,000 $37,500,000$2,500,000
$2,630,000Expense Total $2,630,000 $2,630,000 $2,630,000 $2,630,000 $39,450,000$2,630,000
$1,315,000 $1,315,000 $750,000 $750,000Fund 125 - REET $750,000 $11,250,000$750,000
$1,315,000 $1,315,000 $750,000 $750,000Fund 126 - REET $750,000 $11,250,000$750,000
$0 $0 $1,130,000 $1,130,000Unsecured Funding $1,130,000 $16,950,000$1,130,000
$2,630,000Funding Source Total $2,630,000 $2,630,000 $2,630,000 $2,630,000 $39,450,000$2,630,000
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 12
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 284/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 284/524
Improve pavement conditions, pedestrian accessibility (with ADA curb ramps) and
bike safety on this segment of Main Street.Benefit Improve pavement conditions, pedestrian accessibility (with ADA curb ramps) and
bike safety on this segment of Main Street.
Description The project will provide a full-width grind and pavement overlay of Main St from 6th
Ave to 8th Ave. This project also includes upgrading all non-compliant ADA pedestrian
curb ramps within the project limits, an eastbound bike lane and westbound bike
sharrow markings.
$1,855,000
MAIN ST OVERLAY
FROM 6TH AVE TO 8TH
AVE
PWT-04
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$20,000 $0 $0 $0Construction $0 $0$0
$20,000Expense Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$0
$10,000 $0 $0 $0Fund 125 - REET $0 $0$0
$10,000 $0 $0 $0Fund 126 - REET $0 $0$0
$20,000Funding Source Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$0
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 13
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 285/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 285/524
This upgrade will provide safer roadway conditions since the hanging signal heads will
be replaced with fixed signal heads on mast arms.Benefit This upgrade will provide safer roadway conditions since the hanging signal heads will
be replaced with fixed signal heads on mast arms.
Description The project will rebuild the existing traffic signal and remove the signal heads currently
on span wire and install standard traffic signal poles with mast arms.
$679,000
PUGET DR @ OVD
SIGNAL UPGRADES
PWT-05
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$0 $0 $0 $104,000Design $0 $0$0
$0 $0 $0 $0Construction $575,000 $0$0
$0Expense Total $0 $0 $104,000 $575,000 $0$0
$0 $0 $0 $104,000Unsecured Funding $575,000 $0$0
$0Funding Source Total $0 $0 $104,000 $575,000 $0$0
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 14
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 286/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 286/524
The existing traffic signal is near the end of its anticipated service life.Benefit The existing traffic signal is near the end of its anticipated service life.
Description Install new traffic signal poles and upgrade existing vehicle detection system.
$1,088,000
SIGNAL UPGRADES -
100TH AVE @ 238TH ST
SW
PWT-06
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$0 $0 $0 $192,000Design $0 $0$0
$0 $0 $0 $0Construction $896,000 $0$0
$0Expense Total $0 $0 $192,000 $896,000 $0$0
$0 $0 $0 $192,000Unsecured Funding $896,000 $0$0
$0Funding Source Total $0 $0 $192,000 $896,000 $0$0
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 15
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 287/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 287/524
The existing traffic signal is near the end of its anticipated service life.Benefit The existing traffic signal is near the end of its anticipated service life.
Description Install new traffic signal poles and upgrade existing vehicle detection system.
$572,000
MAIN ST @ 3RD SIGNAL
UPGRADES
PWT-07
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$0 $0 $0 $128,000Design $0 $0$0
$0 $0 $0 $0Construction $444,000 $0$0
$0Expense Total $0 $0 $128,000 $444,000 $0$0
$0 $0 $0 $128,000Unsecured Funding $444,000 $0$0
$0Funding Source Total $0 $0 $128,000 $444,000 $0$0
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 16
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 288/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 288/524
Improve access and safety for pedestrians of all abilities to Civic Park and other
destination points within proximity to 7th Ave N.Benefit Improve access and safety for pedestrians of all abilities to Civic Park and other
destination points within proximity to 7th Ave N.
Description Reconstruction of approximately 13 ramps and installation of a raised crosswalk along
7th Ave between Bell St and SR-524
$484,180
7TH AVE N
PEDESTRIAN
IMPROVEMENTS
PWT-103
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$2,000 $0 $0 $0Construction $0 $0$0
$2,000Expense Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$0
$1,000 $0 $0 $0Fund 125 - REET $0 $0$0
$1,000 $0 $0 $0Fund 126 - REET $0 $0$0
$2,000Funding Source Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$0
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 17
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 289/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 289/524
Improve pavement condition and improve accessibility for pedestrians of all abilities
(as well possibly bicycle users with bike lane additions)Benefit Improve pavement condition and improve accessibility for pedestrians of all abilities
(as well possibly bicycle users with bike lane additions)
Description Pavement overlay along 76th Ave from 220th St SW to SR-99 along with ADA
pedestrian curb ramp upgrades. The addition of bike lanes on both sides of the stretch
will be considered (following completion of parking study). The addition of bike lanes
along this stretch was ranked as HIGH PRIORITY PROJECT (in 2024 Transportation
Plan).
$1,018,000
76TH AVE W OVERLAY
FROM 220TH ST SW TO
SR-99
PWT-104
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$150,000 $0 $0 $0Design $0 $0$0
$0 $868,000 $0 $0Construction $0 $0$0
$150,000Expense Total $868,000 $0 $0 $0 $0$0
$0 $750,000 $0 $0Federal Grants $0 $0$0
$75,000 $59,000 $0 $0Fund 125 - REET $0 $0$0
$75,000 $59,000 $0 $0Fund 126 - REET $0 $0$0
$150,000Funding Source Total $868,000 $0 $0 $0 $0$0
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 18
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 290/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 290/524
Repair roadway and stabilize slope embankment.Benefit Repair roadway and stabilize slope embankment.
Description The project will stabilize the roadway subgrade and embankment and rebuild the
damaged pavement on 175th St SW.
$1,329,000
175TH ST SW SLOPE
REPAIR
PWT-28
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$0 $0 $0 $174,000Design $0 $0$0
$0 $0 $0 $0Construction $1,155,000 $0$0
$0Expense Total $0 $0 $174,000 $1,155,000 $0$0
$0 $0 $0 $174,000Unsecured Funding $1,155,000 $0$0
$0Funding Source Total $0 $0 $174,000 $1,155,000 $0$0
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 19
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 291/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 291/524
Improve pavement condition and improve accessibility for pedestrians of all abilities.Benefit Improve pavement condition and improve accessibility for pedestrians of all abilities.
Description Pavement overlay along Olympic View Dr, from 196th St SW / SR-524 to Talbot Road,
along with ADA pedestrian curb ramp upgrades.
$2,000,000
OLYMPIC VIEW DR
OVERLAY - 196TH / SR-
524 TO TALBOT RD
PWT-61
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$1,831,000 $6,000 $0 $0Construction $0 $0$0
$1,831,000Expense Total $6,000 $0 $0 $0 $0$0
$1,374,500 $0 $0 $0Federal Grants $0 $0$0
$228,250 $3,000 $0 $0Fund 125 - REET $0 $0$0
$228,250 $3,000 $0 $0Fund 126 - REET $0 $0$0
$1,831,000Funding Source Total $6,000 $0 $0 $0 $0$0
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 20
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 292/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 292/524
Improve pavement conditions, pedestrian accessibility (with ADA curb ramps) and
pedestrian safety.Benefit Improve pavement conditions, pedestrian accessibility (with ADA curb ramps) and
pedestrian safety.
Description This project will resurface 88th Ave and improve the existing asphalt sidewalk on the
east side of 88th Ave from 196th St SW to 185th Pl SW in the Seaview neighborhood.
All City utilities along this section of 88th Ave have been upgraded in recent years and
the street is ready to pave. Curb ramps will be upgraded and portions of the existing
sidewalk that are currently in failure will be repaired.
$1,180,000
88TH AVENUE
OVERLAY AND
SIDEWALK REPAIR
PWT-68
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$10,000 $0 $0 $0Construction $0 $0$0
$10,000Expense Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$0
$5,000 $0 $0 $0Fund 125 - REET $0 $0$0
$5,000 $0 $0 $0Fund 126 - REET $0 $0$0
$0 $0 $0 $0Fund 423 - Sewer Utility $0 $0$0
$10,000Funding Source Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$0
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 21
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 293/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 293/524
Improve pedestrian access and safety to Civic Park and other destination points within
proximity to 7th Ave N.Benefit Improve pedestrian access and safety to Civic Park and other destination points within
proximity to 7th Ave N.
Description Reconstruction of approximately 600 LF of existing sidewalk and curb and gutter along
the frontage of Civic Park on 7th Ave N.
$827,000
7TH AVENUE
SIDEWALK REPAIR
PWT-69
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$0 $0 $0 $159,000Design $0 $0$0
$0 $0 $0 $0Construction $668,000 $0$0
$0Expense Total $0 $0 $159,000 $668,000 $0$0
$0 $0 $0 $159,000Unsecured Funding $668,000 $0$0
$0Funding Source Total $0 $0 $159,000 $668,000 $0$0
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 22
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 294/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 294/524
SAFETY/CAPACITY ANALYSIS
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 23
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 295/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 295/524
This project would improve active transportation safety and traffic flows along this
corridor. Community Transit would then explore the feasibility of creating a new east-
west bus route along 228th St SW, if this project moves forward (creating more direct
connection between Edmonds Transit Station and Mountlake Terrace Transit Station).
Benefit This project would improve active transportation safety and traffic flows along this
corridor. Community Transit would then explore the feasibility of creating a new east-
west bus route along 228th St SW, if this project moves forward (creating more direct
connection between Edmonds Transit Station and Mountlake Terrace Transit Station).
Description Widen 228th St SW from Hwy. 99 to 95th Pl. W to three lanes (with center two-way left
turn lane) or left turn lane at key intersections, with curb and gutter, sidewalks, and
bike lanes on both sides of the street. The section of 228th St SW between 92nd Ave
W and 80th Ave W is within Snohomish County. This project ranked as LOW
PRIORITY in 2024 Transportation Plan.
$26,990,000
228TH ST SW FROM
HWY 99 TO 95TH PL W
CORRIDOR
PWT-08
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$0 $0 $0 $3,180,000Design $1,590,000 $0$0
$0 $0 $0 $0Right of Way $3,180,000 $0$0
$0 $0 $0 $0Construction $0 $9,500,000$9,540,000
$0Expense Total $0 $0 $3,180,000 $4,770,000 $9,500,000$9,540,000
$0 $0 $0 $3,180,000Unsecured Funding $4,770,000 $9,500,000$9,540,000
$0Funding Source Total $0 $0 $3,180,000 $4,770,000 $9,500,000$9,540,000
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 24
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 296/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 296/524
Improve aesthetics, safety, and user experience along this segment of the Hwy 99
corridor.Benefit Improve aesthetics, safety, and user experience along this segment of the Hwy 99
corridor.
Description The Stage 3 Highway 99 project limits are from 244th St SW to ~400 feet north of
238th St SW. The project will provide new sidewalk, landscaped planter strips, street
lighting, separated bike lanes, ADA compliant pedestrian curb ramps and utility
improvements (including undergrounding of overhead utility lines). The project will also
widen the intersection of Highway 99 and 238th St SW to provide a second
northbound left turn lane and widen 238th St from Highway 99 to 84th Ave for this
additional lane and bike lane addition. This project was ranked as HIGH PRIORITY in
2024 Transportation Plan.
$29,500,000
HWY 99
REVITALIZATION
PROJECT - STAGE 3
PWT-10
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$1,803,659 $610,000 $0 $0Design $0 $0$0
$3,306,000 $1,144,000 $0 $0Right of Way $0 $0$0
$0 $0 $10,000,000 $9,607,000Construction $0 $0$0
$5,109,659Expense Total $1,754,000 $10,000,000 $9,607,000 $0 $0$0
$5,109,659 $1,754,000 $10,000,000 $9,607,000State Grants $0 $0$0
$0 $0 $0 $0Unsecured Funding $0 $0$0
$5,109,659Funding Source Total $1,754,000 $10,000,000 $9,607,000 $0 $0$0
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 25
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 297/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 297/524
Improve aesthetics, safety, and user experience. In addition, future economic
development would be improved.Benefit Improve aesthetics, safety, and user experience. In addition, future economic
development would be improved.
Description The Stage 4 Highway 99 project limits are from 224th St SW to ~800 feet north of
220th St SW. The project will provide new sidewalk, landscaped planter strips, street
lighting, separated bike lanes, ADA compliant pedestrian curb ramps and utility
improvements (including undergrounding of overhead utility lines). The project will also
widen the intersection of Highway 99 and 220th St SW to provide a second left turn
lane for the northbound, southbound, and westbound movements. A multi-use path will
be added on the north side of 220th St SW from Hwy 99 to the Interurban Trail. This
project was ranked as HIGH PRIORITY in 2024 Transportation Plan.
$38,500,000
HWY 99
REVITALIZATION
PROJECT - STAGE 4
PWT-11
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$2,253,140 $2,200,000 $700,000 $0Design $0 $0$0
$1,275,000 $5,230,000 $1,180,000 $0Right of Way $0 $0$0
$0 $0 $0 $13,100,000Construction $12,000,000 $0$0
$3,528,140Expense Total $7,430,000 $1,880,000 $13,100,000 $12,000,000 $0$0
$845,265 $0 $0 $0Transportation Impact Fees $0 $0$0
$2,682,875 $1,494,625 $0 $0Federal Grants $0 $0$0
$0 $5,935,375 $0 $0State Grants $0 $0$0
$0 $0 $1,880,000 $13,100,000Unsecured Funding $12,000,000 $0$0
$3,528,140Funding Source Total $7,430,000 $1,880,000 $13,100,000 $12,000,000 $0$0
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 26
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 298/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 298/524
Improve aesthetics, safety, and user experience. In addition, future economic
development will be improved along the corridor.Benefit Improve aesthetics, safety, and user experience. In addition, future economic
development will be improved along the corridor.
Description Along Hwy 99 from 216th St SW to 212th St SW, the project will add a planter strip on
both sides of the street, new street lighting, separated bike lanes, better stormwater
management, targeted utility replacements, including undergrounding of overhead
utilities, landscaping and other softscape treatments to identify the area as being in
Edmonds. This project ranked as LOW PRIORITY in 2024 Transportation Plan.
$55,000,000
HWY 99
REVITALIZATION
PROJECT - STAGE 5
PWT-12
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$0 $0 $0 $0Design, ROW, and
Construction
$0 $54,500,000$500,000
$0Expense Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $54,500,000$500,000
$0 $0 $0 $0Unsecured Funding $0 $54,500,000$500,000
$0Funding Source Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $54,500,000$500,000
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 27
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 299/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 299/524
Improve aesthetics, safety, and user experience. In addition, future economic
development would be improved along the corridor.Benefit Improve aesthetics, safety, and user experience. In addition, future economic
development would be improved along the corridor.
Description Along Hwy 99 from 238th St SW to 234th St SW, the project will add a planter strip on
both sides of the street, new street lighting, separated bike lanes, better stormwater
management, targeted utility replacements, including undergrounding of overhead
utilities, landscaping and other softscape treatments to identify the area as being in
Edmonds. This project was ranked as MEDIUM PRIORITY in 2024 Transportation
Plan.
$25,500,000
HWY 99
REVITALIZATION
PROJECT - STAGE 6
PWT-13
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$0 $0 $0 $0Design, ROW, and
Construction
$500,000 $24,000,000$1,000,000
$0Expense Total $0 $0 $0 $500,000 $24,000,000$1,000,000
$0 $0 $0 $0Unsecured Funding $500,000 $24,000,000$1,000,000
$0Funding Source Total $0 $0 $0 $500,000 $24,000,000$1,000,000
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 28
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 300/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 300/524
Improve aesthetics, safety, and user experience. In addition, future economic
development would be improved along the corridor.Benefit Improve aesthetics, safety, and user experience. In addition, future economic
development would be improved along the corridor.
Description Along Hwy 99 from 234th St SW to 228th St SW, the project will add a planter strip on
both sides of the street, new street lighting, separated bike lanes, better stormwater
management, targeted utility replacements, including undergrounding of overhead
utilities, landscaping and other softscape treatments to identify the area as being in
Edmonds. This project was ranked as MEDIUM PRIORITY in 2024 Transportation
Plan.
$46,500,000
HWY 99
REVITALIZATION
PROJECT - STAGE 7
PWT-14
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$0 $0 $0 $0Design, ROW, and
Construction
$0 $46,500,000$0
$0Expense Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $46,500,000$0
$0 $0 $0 $0Unsecured Funding $0 $46,500,000$0
$0Funding Source Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $46,500,000$0
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 29
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 301/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 301/524
Improve aesthetics, safety, and user experience. In addition, future economic
development would be improved along the corridor.Benefit Improve aesthetics, safety, and user experience. In addition, future economic
development would be improved along the corridor.
Description Along Hwy 99 from 228th St SW to 224th St SW, the project will add a planter strip on
both sides of the street, new street lighting, separated bike lanes, better stormwater
management, targeted utility replacements, including undergrounding of overhead
utilities, landscaping and other softscape treatments to identify the area as being in
Edmonds. This project is ranked as MEDIUM PRIORITY in 2024 Transportation Plan.
$43,500,000
HWY 99
REVITALIZATION
PROJECT - STAGE 8
PWT-15
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$0 $0 $0 $0Design, ROW, and
Construction
$0 $43,500,000$0
$0Expense Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $43,500,000$0
$0 $0 $0 $0Unsecured Funding $0 $43,500,000$0
$0Funding Source Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $43,500,000$0
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 30
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 302/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 302/524
Improve aesthetics, safety, and user experience. In addition, future economic
development would be improved along the corridor.Benefit Improve aesthetics, safety, and user experience. In addition, future economic
development would be improved along the corridor.
Description Along Hwy 99 from approximately 500 feet north of 220th St SW to 216th St SW, the
project will add a planter strip on both sides of the street, new street lighting, separated
bike lanes, better stormwater management, targeted utility replacements,
undergrounding of overhead utilities, landscaping and other softscape treatments to
identify the area as being in Edmonds. This project was ranked as MEDIUM
PRIORITY in 2024 Transportation Plan.
$24,600,000
HWY 99
REVITALIZATION
PROJECT - STAGE 9
PWT-16
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$0 $0 $0 $0Design, ROW, and
Construction
$1,060,000 $22,500,000$1,060,000
$0Expense Total $0 $0 $0 $1,060,000 $22,500,000$1,060,000
$0 $0 $0 $0Unsecured Funding $1,060,000 $22,500,000$1,060,000
$0Funding Source Total $0 $0 $0 $1,060,000 $22,500,000$1,060,000
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 31
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 303/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 303/524
Improve traffic flow characteristics and safety at the intersection. The improvements
would improve the LOS, meeting City LOS Standards. Delays and queuing would
increase along 196th St SW.
Benefit Improve traffic flow characteristics and safety at the intersection. The improvements
would improve the LOS, meeting City LOS Standards. Delays and queuing would
increase along 196th St SW.
Description Install traffic signal at the intersection of 196th St SW @ 88th Ave W. An alternative
solution consists in the restriction of northbound and southbound movements to right-
turn only (prohibiting left turn and through movements). This is same alternative as one
concluded by consultant in a 2007 Study but not recommended by City Council. This
could be implemented as an alternate solution, or as an interim solution until traffic
signal warrants are met. The existing LOS is F (below City Standards: LOS D). The
addition of a signal would improve This project was ranked as LOW PRIOIRITY in the
2024 Transportation Plan.
$1,590,000
196TH ST SW / 88TH
AVE W INTERSECTION
IMPROVEMENTS
PWT-17
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$0 $0 $0 $0Design $0 $240,000$0
$0 $0 $0 $0Construction $0 $1,350,000$0
$0Expense Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,590,000$0
$0 $0 $0 $0Unsecured Funding $0 $1,590,000$0
$0Funding Source Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,590,000$0
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 32
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 304/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 304/524
The existing intersection is stop-controlled for all approaches and the projected
intersection LOS in 2044 is LOS F (below the City’s concurrency standards: LOS D).
The installation of a traffic signal would improve the intersection delay to LOS B.
Benefit The existing intersection is stop-controlled for all approaches and the projected
intersection LOS in 2044 is LOS F (below the City’s concurrency standards: LOS D).
The installation of a traffic signal would improve the intersection delay to LOS B.
Description Installation of a traffic signal or mini-roundabout. The preliminary cost estimate for a
new traffic signal is $1,410,000 for all project phases. A conceptual cost estimate for a
mini-roundabout is approximately $500,000. This project was ranked as MEDIUM
PRIORITY in 2024 Transportation Plan.
$1,484,000
MAIN ST @ 9TH AVE
INTERSECTION
IMPROVEMENTS
PWT-18
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$0 $0 $0 $229,000Design $0 $0$0
$0 $0 $0 $0Construction $1,255,000 $0$0
$0Expense Total $0 $0 $229,000 $1,255,000 $0$0
$0 $0 $0 $229,000Unsecured Funding $1,255,000 $0$0
$0Funding Source Total $0 $0 $229,000 $1,255,000 $0$0
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 33
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 305/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 305/524
Reduce the intersection delay and improve the Level of Service (LOS). The projected
LOS in 2044 would be improved from LOS F to LOS D. Improve active transportation
conditions.
Benefit Reduce the intersection delay and improve the Level of Service (LOS). The projected
LOS in 2044 would be improved from LOS F to LOS D. Improve active transportation
conditions.
Description Reconfigure eastbound lanes to a left turn lane and through/ right turn lane. Add
eastbound and westbound dedicated left turn lanes with a protected-permitted phase.
Provide right turn overlap for westbound movement during southbound left turn phase.
Additional improvements include wider sidewalk, bike lanes, street lighting, and various
utility improvements (including conversion overhead utility lines to underground). A
multi-use path will be added along 220th St SW from 76th Ave W to Hwy 99. This
project was ranked as MEDIUM PRIORITY in 2024 Transportation Plan .
$11,000,000
76TH AVE W @ 220TH
ST SW INTERSECTION
IMPROVEMENTS
PWT-19
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$143,000 $108,000 $0 $0Design $0 $0$0
$2,035,000 $1,101,000 $0 $0Right of Way $0 $0$0
$0 $0 $0 $3,370,000Construction $3,300,000 $0$0
$2,178,000Expense Total $1,209,000 $0 $3,370,000 $3,300,000 $0$0
$294,030 $163,215 $0 $0Transportation Impact Fees $0 $0$0
$1,883,970 $1,045,785 $0 $0Federal Grants $0 $0$0
$0 $0 $0 $3,370,000Unsecured Funding $3,300,000 $0$0
$2,178,000Funding Source Total $1,209,000 $0 $3,370,000 $3,300,000 $0$0
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 34
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 306/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 306/524
Improve traffic flows along this regional corridor / principal arterial with a current
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) of ~ 25,000 vehicles per day.Benefit Improve traffic flows along this regional corridor / principal arterial with a current
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) of ~ 25,000 vehicles per day.
Description The project will add a traffic signal adaptive system on a 1.25-mile segment of SR104
from 236th St to 226th St. The system will monitor and synchronize the timing of five
existing signalized intersections (SR104 @ 236th St, SR104 @ 232nd St, SR104 @
95th Pl, SR104 @ 100th Ave, SR104 @ 226th St) and improve traffic flows along
SR104. This project was identified as MEDIUM PRIORITY in 2024 Transportation Plan.
$4,600,000
SR-104 ADAPTIVE
SYSTEM - 236TH TO
226TH
PWT-20
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$80,000 $0 $0 $0Design $0 $0$0
$0 $0 $0 $4,132,000Construction $0 $0$0
$80,000Expense Total $0 $0 $4,132,000 $0 $0$0
$56,000 $0 $0 $0Federal Grants $0 $0$0
$12,000 $0 $0 $279,000Fund 125 - REET $0 $0$0
$12,000 $0 $0 $279,000Fund 126 - REET $0 $0$0
$0 $0 $0 $3,574,000Unsecured Funding $0 $0$0
$80,000Funding Source Total $0 $0 $4,132,000 $0 $0$0
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 35
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 307/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 307/524
Improve access and safety at the signalized intersection and improve active
transportation safety.Benefit Improve access and safety at the signalized intersection and improve active
transportation safety.
Description Implement Westgate Circulation Access Plan, install mid-block pedestrian crossing
along 100th Ave W, improve safety to access the driveways within proximity to the
intersection, and re-striping of 100th Ave W with the potential addition of bike lanes.
This project was identified in the SR-104 Completed Streets Corridor Analysis
(completed in 2015) and ranked as MEDIUM PRIORITY in 2024 Transportation Plan.
$4,876,000
SR-104 @ 100TH AVE W
INTERSECTION
IMPROVEMENTS
PWT-21
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$0 $0 $0 $455,000Design $0 $0$0
$0 $0 $0 $0Right of Way $1,431,000 $0$0
$0 $0 $0 $0Construction $0 $0$2,990,000
$0Expense Total $0 $0 $455,000 $1,431,000 $0$2,990,000
$0 $0 $0 $455,000Unsecured Funding $1,431,000 $0$2,990,000
$0Funding Source Total $0 $0 $455,000 $1,431,000 $0$2,990,000
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 36
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 308/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 308/524
Improve intersection safety for pedestrians and vehicles.Benefit Improve intersection safety for pedestrians and vehicles.
Description Upgrade all ADA Curb Ramps; and add C-Curb for access management. This project
was identified in the SR-104 Complete Streets Corridor Analysis (completed in 2015)
and ranked as LOW PRIORITY in 2024 Transportation Plan.
$318,000
SR-104 @ 95TH PL W
INTERSECTION
IMPROVEMENTS
PWT-22
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$0 $0 $0 $0Design, ROW, Construction $0 $318,000$0
$0Expense Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $318,000$0
$0 $0 $0 $0Unsecured Funding $0 $318,000$0
$0Funding Source Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $318,000$0
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 37
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 309/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 309/524
Improve vehicular and pedestrian safety. The existing Level of Service (LOS) at this
intersection is LOS F and will be improved to LOS C with these improvements (meet
City LOS Standards).
Benefit Improve vehicular and pedestrian safety. The existing Level of Service (LOS) at this
intersection is LOS F and will be improved to LOS C with these improvements (meet
City LOS Standards).
Description Install traffic signal. This project was identified in the SR-104 Complete Street Corridor
Analysis (completed in 2015). This project was identified as LOW PRIORITY in 2024
Transportation Plan.
$1,708,000
SR-104 @ 238TH ST SW
INTERSECTION
IMPROVEMENTS
PWT-23
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$0 $0 $0 $0Design $0 $256,000$0
$0 $0 $0 $0Construction $0 $1,452,000$0
$0Expense Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,708,000$0
$0 $0 $0 $0Unsecured Funding $0 $1,708,000$0
$0Funding Source Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,708,000$0
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 38
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 310/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 310/524
The improvement will reduce the intersection delay. The projected Level of Service is
LOS F in 2044, which is below the City’s concurrency standards (LOS D). The project
will improve the Level of Service to LOS B.
Benefit The improvement will reduce the intersection delay. The projected Level of Service is
LOS F in 2044, which is below the City’s concurrency standards (LOS D). The project
will improve the Level of Service to LOS B.
Description Install traffic signal (the intersection currently stop controlled for all movements
(identified as LOW PRIORITY PROJECT in 2024 Transportation Plan). This
intersection is a shared intersection with City of Lynnwood.
$1,500,000
OLYMPIC VIEW DR @
76TH AVE W
INTERSECTION
IMPROVEMENTS
PWT-24
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$0 $0 $0 $0Design, ROW, Construction $0 $1,500,000$0
$0Expense Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,500,000$0
$0 $0 $0 $0Unsecured Funding $0 $1,500,000$0
$0Funding Source Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,500,000$0
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 39
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 311/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 311/524
Improve traffic flow, access and active transportation use with the addition of left turn
lane at selected intersections, sidewalks, bike lanes on both sides of the street, and
street lighting.
Benefit Improve traffic flow, access and active transportation use with the addition of left turn
lane at selected intersections, sidewalks, bike lanes on both sides of the street, and
street lighting.
Description Widen 84th Ave W to curb and gutter, bike lanes, sidewalk on each side of the street
and addition of left turn lane at selected key intersections. This project was ranked as
MEDIUM PRIORITY in 2024 Transportation Plan. The segment of 84th Ave W from
230th St SW to 220th St SW is within Snohomish County ROW.
$17,800,000
84TH AVE W (212TH ST
SW TO 238TH ST SW)
PWT-25
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$0 $0 $0 $0Design, ROW, Construction $0 $17,800,000$0
$0Expense Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $17,800,000$0
$0 $0 $0 $0Unsecured Funding $0 $17,800,000$0
$0Funding Source Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $17,800,000$0
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 40
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 312/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 312/524
Improve access, safety and delay at the intersection for vehicles and active
transportation users.Benefit Improve access, safety and delay at the intersection for vehicles and active
transportation users.
Description Extend bike lanes within proximity to intersection in northbound and southbound
directions. Add westbound right turn lane along SR-104 (125' storage length). This
project was ranked as MEDIUM PRIORITY in 2024 Transportation Plan.
$2,819,000
SR-104 @ 76TH AVE W
INTERSECTION
IMPROVEMENTS
PWT-43
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$0 $0 $0 $515,000Design, ROW, and
Construction
$2,304,000 $0$0
$0Expense Total $0 $0 $515,000 $2,304,000 $0$0
$0 $0 $0 $515,000Unsecured Funding $2,304,000 $0$0
$0Funding Source Total $0 $0 $515,000 $2,304,000 $0$0
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 41
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 313/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 313/524
Improve reliability of traffic signal operation.Benefit Improve reliability of traffic signal operation.
Description This program started in 2019 and provides new signal upgrades, such as vehicle
detection at intersections, new vehicle/pedestrian head equipment and other signal-
related upgrades. These improvements will improve the safety of the City’s
transportation system.
$30,280
TRAFFIC SIGNAL
PROGRAM
PWT-59
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$1,000 $1,000 $0 $0Design $0 $0$0
$29,280 $29,280 $0 $0Construction $0 $0$0
$30,280Expense Total $30,280 $0 $0 $0 $0$0
$15,140 $0 $0 $0Fund 125 - REET $0 $0$0
$15,140 $30,280 $0 $0Fund 126 - REET $0 $0$0
$30,280Funding Source Total $30,280 $0 $0 $0 $0$0
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 42
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 314/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 314/524
Improve traffic flows along the entire corridor and reduce intersection delays at
signalized intersections (220th St SW, 216th St SW, 212th St SW, and 206th St SW).Benefit Improve traffic flows along the entire corridor and reduce intersection delays at
signalized intersections (220th St SW, 216th St SW, 212th St SW, and 206th St SW).
Description Installation of a signal adaptive system along 76th Ave W from 206th St SW to 220th
St. This project was ranked as HIGH PRIORITY in 2024 Transportation Plan.
$3,074,000
76TH AVE W ADAPTIVE
SYSTEM FROM 206TH
ST SW TO 220TH ST SW
PWT-97
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$0 $0 $0 $461,000Design $0 $0$0
$0 $0 $0 $0Construction $2,613,000 $0$0
$0Expense Total $0 $0 $461,000 $2,613,000 $0$0
$0 $0 $0 $461,000Unsecured Funding $2,613,000 $0$0
$0Funding Source Total $0 $0 $461,000 $2,613,000 $0$0
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 43
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 315/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 315/524
Improve night-time intersection safety of all users.Benefit Improve night-time intersection safety of all users.
Description Install new light poles at key intersections where serious injury collisions have occurred
recently. The intersections include 76th Ave W @ Interurban Trail, 8th Ave S @ 14th
St SW, 76th Ave W @ 200th St SW, SR-524 @ 9th Ave N, 84th Ave W @ 236th St
SW, and Dayton St. between Railroad Tracks and SR-104.
$700,000
CITYWIDE LIGHTING
IMPROVEMENTS
PWT-98
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$5,000 $0 $0 $0Construction $0 $0$0
$5,000Expense Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$0
$5,000 $0 $0 $0Federal Grants $0 $0$0
$5,000Funding Source Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$0
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 44
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 316/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 316/524
NON-MOTORIZED TRANSPORTATION
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 45
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 317/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 317/524
This project would improve pedestrian safety, connecting Scriber Lake School / ball
fields to a residential area and a principal arterial.Benefit This project would improve pedestrian safety, connecting Scriber Lake School / ball
fields to a residential area and a principal arterial.
Description Install sidewalk along 232nd St SW from 100th Ave W to SR-104. This project ranks
as MEDIUM PRIORITY in 2024 Transportation Plan.
$4,558,000
232ND ST SW
WALKWAY FROM
100TH AVE TO SR-104
PWT-29
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$0 $0 $0 $684,000Design $0 $0$0
$0 $0 $0 $0Construction $3,874,000 $0$0
$0Expense Total $0 $0 $684,000 $3,874,000 $0$0
$0 $0 $0 $684,000Unsecured Funding $3,874,000 $0$0
$0Funding Source Total $0 $0 $684,000 $3,874,000 $0$0
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 46
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 318/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 318/524
This project would improve pedestrian safety along a stretch on the east side of
Highway 99, linking Hwy 99 to a minor arterial.Benefit This project would improve pedestrian safety along a stretch on the east side of
Highway 99, linking Hwy 99 to a minor arterial.
Description Install sidewalk along 236th St SW from Hwy 99 to 76th Ave W. This project ranked as
HIGH PRIORITY in the 2024 Transportation Plan.
$2,385,000
236TH ST SW
WALKWAY FROM HWY
99 TO 76TH AVE W
PWT-31
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$0 $0 $0 $371,000Design $0 $0$0
$0 $0 $0 $0Construction $2,014,000 $0$0
$0Expense Total $0 $0 $371,000 $2,014,000 $0$0
$0 $0 $0 $371,000Unsecured Funding $2,014,000 $0$0
$0Funding Source Total $0 $0 $371,000 $2,014,000 $0$0
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 47
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 319/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 319/524
This project would improve pedestrian safety, adding a sidewalk along a minor arterial
with Average Daily Traffic of ~ 5,000 vehicles per day.Benefit This project would improve pedestrian safety, adding a sidewalk along a minor arterial
with Average Daily Traffic of ~ 5,000 vehicles per day.
Description The walkway project proposed approximately 1,000 LF of new sidewalk on the east
side of 84th Ave W with ADA compliant pedestrian curb ramps. This project was
ranked as MEDIUM PRIORITY in 2024 Transportation Plan.
$2,894,000
84TH AVE W
WALKWAY FROM
238TH ST SW TO
234TH ST SW
PWT-32
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$0 $0 $0 $159,000Design $159,000 $0$0
$0 $0 $0 $0ROW $244,000 $0$0
$0 $0 $0 $0Construction $0 $0$2,332,000
$0Expense Total $0 $0 $159,000 $403,000 $0$2,332,000
$0 $0 $0 $159,000Unsecured Funding $403,000 $0$2,332,000
$0Funding Source Total $0 $0 $159,000 $403,000 $0$2,332,000
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 48
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 320/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 320/524
The improvements will improve active transportation safety (including for school kids
due to proximity of several schools).Benefit The improvements will improve active transportation safety (including for school kids
due to proximity of several schools).
Description Install sidewalk along 80th Ave W from 206th St SW to 212th St SW with curb and
gutter. This project was ranked as MEDIUM PRIORITY in the 2024 Transportation
Plan.
$3,068,000
80TH AVE W
WALKWAY FROM
212TH ST SW TO
206TH ST SW
PWT-33
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$0 $0 $0 $0Construction $0 $0$2,612,000
$0 $0 $0 $0Design $456,000 $0$0
$0Expense Total $0 $0 $0 $456,000 $0$2,612,000
$0 $0 $0 $0Unsecured Funding $456,000 $0$2,612,000
$0Funding Source Total $0 $0 $0 $456,000 $0$2,612,000
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 49
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 321/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 321/524
This project would improve pedestrian safety along a collector street with connections
to / from a residential street to Seaview Park and Snohomish County Park along
Olympic View Dr.
Benefit This project would improve pedestrian safety along a collector street with connections
to / from a residential street to Seaview Park and Snohomish County Park along
Olympic View Dr.
Description Install sidewalk along 80th Ave W from 188th St SW to OVD. This project ranked as
MEDIUM PRIORITY in 2024 Transportation Plan.
$6,678,000
80TH AVE W
WALKWAY FROM
188TH ST SW TO
OLYMPIC VIEW DR
PWT-34
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$0 $0 $0 $0Design $0 $1,000,000$0
$0 $0 $0 $0Construction $0 $5,678,000$0
$0Expense Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,678,000$0
$0 $0 $0 $0Unsecured Funding $0 $6,678,000$0
$0Funding Source Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,678,000$0
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 50
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 322/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 322/524
The improvements will improve pedestrian safety with the addition of a sidewalk on
one side of street, providing sidewalk connections to Chase Lake Elementary School
on 84th Ave W.
Benefit The improvements will improve pedestrian safety with the addition of a sidewalk on
one side of street, providing sidewalk connections to Chase Lake Elementary School
on 84th Ave W.
Description Install sidewalk along 218th St SW from 76th Ave W to 84th Ave W with curb and
gutter. This project ranked as MEDIUM PRIORITY in 2024 Transportation Plan.
$4,133,000
218TH ST SW
WALKWAY FROM 76TH
AVE W TO 84TH AVE W
PWT-35
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$0 $0 $0 $0Construction $0 $3,513,000$0
$0 $0 $0 $0Design $0 $620,000$0
$0Expense Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,133,000$0
$0 $0 $0 $0Unsecured Funding $0 $4,133,000$0
$0Funding Source Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,133,000$0
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 51
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 323/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 323/524
This project will improve pedestrian safety along this stretch with the Downtown
Edmonds. This short stretch would complete a short missing sidewalk link.Benefit This project will improve pedestrian safety along this stretch with the Downtown
Edmonds. This short stretch would complete a short missing sidewalk link.
Description Install sidewalk on the south side of Walnut St from 6th Ave S to 7th Ave S. This
project is ranked as MEDIUM PRIORITY in 2024 Transportation Plan.
$424,000
WALNUT ST WALKWAY
FROM 6TH AVE S TO
7TH AVE S
PWT-36
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$0 $0 $0 $0Design $0 $85,000$0
$0 $0 $0 $0Construction $0 $339,000$0
$0Expense Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $424,000$0
$0 $0 $0 $0Unsecured Funding $0 $424,000$0
$0Funding Source Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $424,000$0
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 52
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 324/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 324/524
Create pedestrian connection between Maplewood Elementary School on 200th St
SW and Main St, by encouraging kids to use non-motorized transportation to walk to /
from school.
Benefit Create pedestrian connection between Maplewood Elementary School on 200th St
SW and Main St, by encouraging kids to use non-motorized transportation to walk to /
from school.
Description Construct sidewalk on Maplewood Dr. from Main St to 200th St SW (~ 2,700’). A
sidewalk currently exists on 200th St SW from Main St to 76th Ave W, adjacent to
Maplewood Elementary School (ranked in Medium Priority Ranking List of the 2024
Transportation Plan).
$4,770,000
MAPLEWOOD DR
WALKWAY FROM MAIN
ST TO 200TH ST SW
PWT-40
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$0 $0 $0 $371,000Design $371,000 $0$0
$0 $0 $0 $0Construction $0 $0$4,028,000
$0Expense Total $0 $0 $371,000 $371,000 $0$4,028,000
$0 $0 $0 $371,000Unsecured Funding $371,000 $0$4,028,000
$0Funding Source Total $0 $0 $371,000 $371,000 $0$4,028,000
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 53
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 325/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 325/524
Improve active transportation safety along the Interurban Trail (Regional Trail linking
Seattle to Everett).Benefit Improve active transportation safety along the Interurban Trail (Regional Trail linking
Seattle to Everett).
Description Extend bike lanes within proximity of the intersection in northbound and southbound
directions. Install APS on all corner and new ADA curb ramps. This project was ranked
as MEDIUM PRIORITY in 2024 Transportation Plan.
$2,819,000
SR-104 @ 76TH AVE W
NON-MOTORIZED
TRANSPORTATION
IMPROVEMENTS
PWT-43
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$0 $0 $0 $515,000Design, ROW, and
Construction
$2,304,000 $0$0
$0Expense Total $0 $0 $515,000 $2,304,000 $0$0
$0 $0 $0 $515,000Unsecured Funding $2,304,000 $0$0
$0Funding Source Total $0 $0 $515,000 $2,304,000 $0$0
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 54
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 326/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 326/524
This project will improve pedestrian connectivity between the residential areas along
3rd Ave S to Downtown Edmonds and City Park.Benefit This project will improve pedestrian connectivity between the residential areas along
3rd Ave S to Downtown Edmonds and City Park.
Description Installation of sidewalk with ADA curb ramps along SR-104 from the HAWK signal to
Pine St and along Pine St from SR-104 to 9th Ave S. This project ranked as MEDIUM
PRIORITY in 2024 Transportation Plan.
$7,207,000
SR-104 / PINE S
WALKWAY FROM
HAWK TO PINE / SR-
104 TO 9TH
PWT-45
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$0 $0 $0 $0Construction $0 $1,081,000$0
$0 $0 $0 $0Design $0 $6,126,000$0
$0Expense Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $7,207,000$0
$0 $0 $0 $0Unsecured Funding $0 $7,207,000$0
$0Funding Source Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $7,207,000$0
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 55
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 327/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 327/524
This project would improve pedestrian safety along this stretch, creating a active
transportation connection between a local park (Hickman Park) and Sherwood
Elementary / residential areas within proximity.
Benefit This project would improve pedestrian safety along this stretch, creating a active
transportation connection between a local park (Hickman Park) and Sherwood
Elementary / residential areas within proximity.
Description Install sidewalk along 104th Ave W from 238th St SW to 106th Ave W, with curb and
gutter. This project ranked as MEDIUM PRIOIRTY in 2024 Transportation Plan.
$2,332,000
104TH AVE W /
ROBINHOOD LN
WALKWAY FROM
238TH ST TO 106TH
AVE W
PWT-47
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$0 $0 $0 $0Design $0 $350,000$0
$0 $0 $0 $0Construction $0 $1,982,000$0
$0Expense Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,332,000$0
$0 $0 $0 $0Unsecured Grants $0 $2,332,000$0
$0Funding Source Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,332,000$0
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 56
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 328/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 328/524
Improve active transportation safety.Benefit Improve active transportation safety.
Description The project consists of installing ADA compliant curb ramps throughout the City along
Bowdoin Ave from Yost Park to Five Corners, 3rd Ave. N @ Giltner, and 76th Ave. W
@ 236th St. SW.
$891,733
PEDESTRIAN
IMPROVEMENTS (2027)
PWT-56
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$753,500 $0 $0 $0Construction $0 $0$0
$753,500Expense Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$0
$89,650 $0 $0 $0Fund 125 - REET $0 $0$0
$89,650 $0 $0 $0Fund 126 - REET $0 $0$0
$574,200 $0 $0 $0State Grants $0 $0$0
$753,500Funding Source Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$0
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 57
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 329/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 329/524
Improve active transportation safety at pedestrian crossings. Safety improvements at
such locations will increase the number of active transportation users on our streets
(since this will feel more comfortable using the existing facilities).
Benefit Improve active transportation safety at pedestrian crossings. Safety improvements at
such locations will increase the number of active transportation users on our streets
(since this will feel more comfortable using the existing facilities).
Description This program started in 2019 and will provide pedestrian safety improvements, such as
additional signage / striping, flashing LED’s around stop signs, or other improvements.
These improvements will improve the safety of the City’s transportation system.
$20,180
PEDESTRIAN SAFETY
PROGRAM
PWT-60
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$1,000 $1,000 $0 $0Design $0 $0$0
$19,180 $19,180 $0 $0Construction $0 $0$0
$20,180Expense Total $20,180 $0 $0 $0 $0$0
$20,180 $20,180 $0 $0Fund 126 - REET $0 $0$0
$20,180Funding Source Total $20,180 $0 $0 $0 $0$0
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 58
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 330/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 330/524
Improve active transportation safety along this corridor with an ADT ranging from
6,000 vpd to 10,000 vpd.Benefit Improve active transportation safety along this corridor with an ADT ranging from
6,000 vpd to 10,000 vpd.
Description Installation of 10' multi-use path along Caspers / 9th Ave N Puget Dr., creating new
active transportation connections. This project was ranked as HIGH PRIORITY in 2024
Transportation Plan.
$12,820,000
CASPERS / 9TH AVE N /
PUGET MULTI-USE
PATH FROM ADMIRAL
WAY TO OLYMPIC
VIEW DR
PWT-71
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$0 $0 $0 $1,060,000Design $1,060,000 $0$0
$0 $0 $0 $0Construction $0 $0$10,700,000
$0Expense Total $0 $0 $1,060,000 $1,060,000 $0$10,700,000
$0 $0 $0 $1,060,000Unsecured Funding $1,060,000 $0$10,700,000
$0Funding Source Total $0 $0 $1,060,000 $1,060,000 $0$10,700,000
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 59
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 331/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 331/524
Improve active transportation safety along this corridor with an ADT of ranging from
13,000 vpd to 25,000 vpd.Benefit Improve active transportation safety along this corridor with an ADT of ranging from
13,000 vpd to 25,000 vpd.
Description Installation of 10' multi-use path along SR-104 from 100th Ave W to Main St, creating
new active transportation connections. This project was considered a HIGH PRIORITY
in 2024 Transportation Plan.
$29,150,000
SR-104 MULTI-USE
PATH FROM 100TH
AVE W TO MAIN ST
PWT-72
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$0 $0 $0 $2,650,000Design $2,650,000 $0$0
$0 $0 $0 $0Construction $0 $0$21,200,000
$0 $0 $0 $0Right of Way $2,650,000 $0$0
$0Expense Total $0 $0 $2,650,000 $5,300,000 $0$21,200,000
$0 $0 $0 $2,650,000Unsecured Funding $5,300,000 $0$21,200,000
$0Funding Source Total $0 $0 $2,650,000 $5,300,000 $0$21,200,000
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 60
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 332/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 332/524
Improve active transportation safety along this corridor with an ADT of approximately
12,500 vpd.Benefit Improve active transportation safety along this corridor with an ADT of approximately
12,500 vpd.
Description Installation of 10' multi-use path along 212th St SW from 74th Ave W to Hwy 99,
creating new active transportation connections. This project was considered a HIGH
PRIORITY in 2024 Transportation Plan.
$5,512,000
212TH ST SW MULTI-
USE PATH FROM 74TH
AVE W TO HWY 99
PWT-73
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$0 $0 $0 $0Design $530,000 $0$530,000
$0 $0 $0 $0Right of Way $0 $0$1,060,000
$0 $0 $0 $0Construction $0 $3,392,000$0
$0Expense Total $0 $0 $0 $530,000 $3,392,000$1,590,000
$0 $0 $0 $0Unsecured Funding $530,000 $3,392,000$1,590,000
$0Funding Source Total $0 $0 $0 $530,000 $3,392,000$1,590,000
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 61
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 333/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 333/524
Improve active transportation safety along this corridor with an ADT of approximately
25,000 vpd, connecting Westgate Village to southern portion of Edmonds.Benefit Improve active transportation safety along this corridor with an ADT of approximately
25,000 vpd, connecting Westgate Village to southern portion of Edmonds.
Description Installation of 10' multi-use path along SR-104 from 100th Ave W to 244th St SW,
creating new active transportation connections. This project was considered a HIGH
PRIORITY in 2024 Transportation Plan.
$24,380,000
SR-104 MULTI-USE
PATH FROM 100TH
AVE W TO 244TH ST SW
PWT-74
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$0 $0 $0 $1,590,000Design $2,120,000 $0$0
$0 $0 $0 $0Right of Way $0 $0$4,240,000
$0 $0 $0 $0Construction $0 $16,430,000$0
$0Expense Total $0 $0 $1,590,000 $2,120,000 $16,430,000$4,240,000
$0 $0 $0 $1,590,000Unsecured Funding $2,120,000 $16,430,000$4,240,000
$0Funding Source Total $0 $0 $1,590,000 $2,120,000 $16,430,000$4,240,000
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 62
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 334/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 334/524
Improve active transportation safety along this corridor with an ADT of approximately
6,500 vpd, connecting the Ferry Terminal to the heart of Downtown Edmonds.Benefit Improve active transportation safety along this corridor with an ADT of approximately
6,500 vpd, connecting the Ferry Terminal to the heart of Downtown Edmonds.
Description Installation of bike lane for the eastbound uphill movement on Main St from the Ferry
Terminal to 6th Ave W. This addition is possible with the roadway widening.
$8,860,000
MAIN ST BIKE LANES
FROM THE FERRY
TERMINAL TO 6TH AVE
PWT-75
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$0 $0 $0 $0Design $0 $1,590,000$0
$0 $0 $0 $0Right of Way $0 $1,060,000$0
$0 $0 $0 $0Construction $0 $6,360,000$0
$0Expense Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $9,010,000$0
$0 $0 $0 $0Unsecured Funding $0 $9,010,000$0
$0Funding Source Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $9,010,000$0
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 63
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 335/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 335/524
Improve active transportation safety along this stretch, linking a residential area (on
east side of Highway 99) to Highway 99.Benefit Improve active transportation safety along this stretch, linking a residential area (on
east side of Highway 99) to Highway 99.
Description Installation of sidewalk along 240th St SW / 78th Ave, W from Hwy 99 to 236th St SW.
This project was identified as HIGH PRIORITY in 2024 Transportation Plan
$4,786,000
240TH ST SW / 78TH
AVE W WALKWAY
FROM HWY 99 TO
236TH ST SW
PWT-76
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$0 $0 $0 $318,000Design $318,000 $0$0
$0 $0 $0 $0Construction $0 $0$4,150,000
$0Expense Total $0 $0 $318,000 $318,000 $0$4,150,000
$0 $0 $0 $318,000Unsecured Funding $318,000 $0$4,150,000
$0Funding Source Total $0 $0 $318,000 $318,000 $0$4,150,000
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 64
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 336/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 336/524
This addition creates safer bicycle conditions along this corridor with Average Daily
Traffic (ADT) of 4,000 vehicles per day.Benefit This addition creates safer bicycle conditions along this corridor with Average Daily
Traffic (ADT) of 4,000 vehicles per day.
Description Installation of bike lanes along 9th Ave N from Main St to Caspers St through
restriping. This project was ranked HIGH PRIORITY in 2024 Transportation Plan.
$297,000
9TH AVE N BIKE
LANES FROM MAIN ST
TO CASPERS ST
PWT-77
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$0 $0 $0 $0Design $53,000 $0$0
$0 $0 $0 $0Construction $0 $0$244,000
$0Expense Total $0 $0 $0 $53,000 $0$244,000
$0 $0 $0 $0Unsecured Funding $53,000 $0$244,000
$0Funding Source Total $0 $0 $0 $53,000 $0$244,000
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 65
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 337/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 337/524
Improve bicycle safety along this corridor with Average Daily Traffic (ADT) of 8,000
vehicles per day and reduce speed through the addition of landscaped raised median
along portion of the stretch.
Benefit Improve bicycle safety along this corridor with Average Daily Traffic (ADT) of 8,000
vehicles per day and reduce speed through the addition of landscaped raised median
along portion of the stretch.
Description Addition of bike lanes along Main St from 9th Ave to 84th Ave W through the re-
striping of this corridor.. This project is identified as a HIGH PRIORITY in 2024
Transportation Plan.
$859,000
MAIN ST BIKE LANES
FROM 9TH AVE TO
84TH AVE W
PWT-78
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$0 $0 $0 $118,000Design $0 $0$0
$0 $0 $0 $0Construction $741,200 $0$0
$0Expense Total $0 $0 $118,000 $741,200 $0$0
$0 $0 $0 $11,800Fund 125 - REET $74,100 $0$0
$0 $0 $0 $11,800Fund 126 - REET $74,100 $0$0
$0 $0 $0 $94,400Unsecured Funding $593,000 $0$0
$0Funding Source Total $0 $0 $118,000 $741,200 $0$0
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 66
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 338/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 338/524
Improve bicycle safety along this principal arterial with a new connection within the
bicycle network.Benefit Improve bicycle safety along this principal arterial with a new connection within the
bicycle network.
Description Addition of bike lanes on both sides of 238th St SW from SR-104 to 84th Ave W
through roadway widening. This project was ranked as HIGH PRIORITY in 2024
Transportation Plan.
$573,000
238TH ST SW BIKE
LANES FROM SR-104
TO 84TH AVE W
PWT-79
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$0 $0 $0 $85,000Design $0 $0$0
$0 $0 $0 $0Construction $488,000 $0$0
$0Expense Total $0 $0 $85,000 $488,000 $0$0
$0 $0 $0 $85,000Unsecured Funding $488,000 $0$0
$0Funding Source Total $0 $0 $85,000 $488,000 $0$0
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 67
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 339/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 339/524
Improve pedestrian safety along this local street (linking to Madrona Elementary
School).Benefit Improve pedestrian safety along this local street (linking to Madrona Elementary
School).
Description Installation of sidewalk on one side of 236th St SW from 94th Ave to 84th Ave W. This
project was ranked as HIGH PRIORITY in 2024 Transportation Plan.
$3,286,000
236TH ST SW
WALKWAY FROM 94TH
AVE W TO 84TH AVE W
PWT-80
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$0 $0 $0 $530,000Design $0 $0$0
$0 $0 $0 $0Construction $2,756,000 $0$0
$0Expense Total $0 $0 $530,000 $2,756,000 $0$0
$0 $0 $0 $530,000Unsecured Funding $2,756,000 $0$0
$0Funding Source Total $0 $0 $530,000 $2,756,000 $0$0
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 68
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 340/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 340/524
Improve active transportation safety along this stretch, creating a connection from
Downtown Edmonds along this very scenic local street.Benefit Improve active transportation safety along this stretch, creating a connection from
Downtown Edmonds along this very scenic local street.
Description Installation of multi-use path along Sunset Ave / Caspers St from 3rd Ave N to SR-
104.This project was identified as HIGH PRIORITY in 2024 Transportation Plan.
$5,700,000
SUNSET AVE MULTI-
USE PATH FROM
CASPERS ST TO 3RD
AVE N / SR-104
PWT-81
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$0 $0 $0 $0Design, ROW, and
Construction
$0 $5,700,000$0
$0Expense Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,700,000$0
$0 $0 $0 $0Unsecured Funding $0 $5,700,000$0
$0Funding Source Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,700,000$0
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 69
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 341/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 341/524
Improve active transportation safety along this collector street with Average Daily
Traffic (ADT) of 4,500 vehicles per day.Benefit Improve active transportation safety along this collector street with Average Daily
Traffic (ADT) of 4,500 vehicles per day.
Description Installation of multi-use path along Olympic View Dr. from 76th Ave W to City limits.
This project ranked as HIGH PRIORITY PROJECT in 2024 Transportation Plan.
$19,000,000
OLYMPIC VIEW DR
MULTI-USE PATH
FROM 76TH AVE W TO
CITY LIMITS
PWT-83
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$0 $0 $0 $0Design, ROW, and
Construction
$0 $19,000,000$0
$0Expense Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $19,000,000$0
$0 $0 $0 $0Unsecured Funding $0 $19,000,000$0
$0Funding Source Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $19,000,000$0
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 70
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 342/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 342/524
Improve active transportation safety along this principal arterial (with Average Daily
Traffic / ADT of 13,000 vehicles per day), connecting to commercial areas on the east
side and parks / residential areas on the west side.
Benefit Improve active transportation safety along this principal arterial (with Average Daily
Traffic / ADT of 13,000 vehicles per day), connecting to commercial areas on the east
side and parks / residential areas on the west side.
Description Installation of multi-use path along 196th St SW from 88th Ave W to 76th Ave W. This
project ranked as HIGH PRIOIRITY in 2024 Transportation Plan.
$9,800,000
196TH ST SW MULTI-
USE PATH FROM 88TH
AVE W TO 76TH AVE W
PWT-84
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$0 $0 $0 $0Design, ROW, and
Construction
$0 $9,800,000$0
$0Expense Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $9,800,000$0
$0 $0 $0 $0Unsecured Funding $0 $9,800,000$0
$0Funding Source Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $9,800,000$0
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 71
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 343/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 343/524
Improve pedestrian safety along this stretch within Downtown Edmonds and
completing short missing link.Benefit Improve pedestrian safety along this stretch within Downtown Edmonds and
completing short missing link.
Description Installation of sidewalk along Maple St from 8th Ave to 9th Ave. This project ranked as
MEDIUM PRIORITY in 2024 Transportation Plan.
$979,000
MAPLE ST WALKWAY
FROM 8TH AVE TO 9TH
AVE
PWT-87
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$0 $0 $0 $0Design $0 $147,000$0
$0 $0 $0 $0Construction $0 $832,000$0
$0Expense Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $979,000$0
$0 $0 $0 $0Unsecured Funding $0 $979,000$0
$0Funding Source Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $979,000$0
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 72
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 344/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 344/524
Improve pedestrian safety along this stretch, connecting two minor arterials with
mostly residential area.Benefit Improve pedestrian safety along this stretch, connecting two minor arterials with
mostly residential area.
Description Installation of sidewalk along 218th St SW from 84th Ave W to 76th Ave W. This
project was ranked as MEDIUM PRIORITY in 2024 Transportation Plan.
$4,134,000
218TH ST SW
WALKWAY FROM 84TH
AVE W TO 76TH AVE W
PWT-88
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$0 $0 $0 $0Construction $0 $3,514,000$0
$0 $0 $0 $0Design $0 $620,000$0
$0Expense Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,134,000$0
$0 $0 $0 $0Unsecured Funding $0 $4,134,000$0
$0Funding Source Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,134,000$0
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 73
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 345/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 345/524
Improve pedestrian safety along this collector street, providing connections from a
residential area to Maplewood Park and Seaview Elementary School along 200th St
SW
Benefit Improve pedestrian safety along this collector street, providing connections from a
residential area to Maplewood Park and Seaview Elementary School along 200th St
SW
Description Installation of sidewalk along 88th Ave W from 200th St SW to 196th St SW. This
project was ranked as MEDIUM PRIORITY in 2024 Transportation Plan.
$2,279,000
88TH AVE W
WALKWAY FROM
200TH ST SW TO
196TH ST SW
PWT-89
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$0 $0 $0 $0Design $0 $341,000$0
$0 $0 $0 $0Construction $0 $1,938,000$0
$0Expense Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,279,000$0
$0 $0 $0 $0Unsecured Funding $0 $2,279,000$0
$0Funding Source Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,279,000$0
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 74
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 346/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 346/524
Improve pedestrian safety along this stretch, connecting a residential area to both
Yost Park and Edmonds Elementary School.Benefit Improve pedestrian safety along this stretch, connecting a residential area to both
Yost Park and Edmonds Elementary School.
Description Installation of sidewalk along Olympic Ave from Olympic View Dr. to Puget Dr. This
project was ranked as MEDIUM PRIORITY in 2024 Transportation Plan.
$1,325,000
OLYMPIC AVE
WALKWAY FROM
OLYMPIC VIEW DR TO
PUGET DR
PWT-91
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$0 $0 $0 $0Construction $0 $1,127,000$0
$0 $0 $0 $0Design $0 $198,000$0
$0Expense Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,325,000$0
$0 $0 $0 $0Unsecured Funding $0 $1,325,000$0
$0Funding Source Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,325,000$0
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 75
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 347/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 347/524
Improve pedestrian safety along this windy collector street (with Average Daily Traffic
of approximately 1,000 vehicles per day), linking a minor arterial with a collector street.Benefit Improve pedestrian safety along this windy collector street (with Average Daily Traffic
of approximately 1,000 vehicles per day), linking a minor arterial with a collector street.
Description Installation of sidewalk along Meadowdale Beach Rd. from 75th Pl. W to Olympic View
Dr.. This project was ranked as MEDIUM PRIORITY in 2024 Transportation Plan.
$7,000,000
MEADOWDALE BEACH
RD WALKWAY FROM
75TH PL W TO
OLYMPIC VIEW DR
PWT-92
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$0 $0 $0 $0Design $0 $1,000,000$0
$0 $0 $0 $0Construction $0 $6,000,000$0
$0Expense Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $7,000,000$0
$0 $0 $0 $0Unsecured Funding $0 $7,000,000$0
$0Funding Source Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $7,000,000$0
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 76
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 348/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 348/524
Improve pedestrian safety along this stretch, creating a connection between a
residential and the Pine St Playfields.Benefit Improve pedestrian safety along this stretch, creating a connection between a
residential and the Pine St Playfields.
Description Installation of sidewalk along 6th Ave from Elm St to Pine St. This project was ranked
as MEDIUM PRIORITY in 2024 Transportation Plan.
$1,166,000
6TH AVE WALKWAY
FROM ELM WAY TO
PINE ST
PWT-93
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$0 $0 $0 $0Design $0 $175,000$0
$0 $0 $0 $0Construction $0 $991,000$0
$0Expense Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,166,000$0
$0 $0 $0 $0Unsecured Funding $0 $1,166,000$0
$0Funding Source Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,166,000$0
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 77
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 349/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 349/524
Improve pedestrian safety along this local street on the east side of Highway 99
(linking principal arterial / Hwy 99 with minor arterial / 76th Ave W)Benefit Improve pedestrian safety along this local street on the east side of Highway 99
(linking principal arterial / Hwy 99 with minor arterial / 76th Ave W)
Description Installation of sidewalk along 234th St SW from Hwy 99 to 76th Ave W. This project
was ranked as MEDIUM PRIORITY as part of 2024 Transportation Plan.
$2,491,000
234TH ST SW
WALKWAY FROM HWY
99 TO 76TH AVE W
PWT-96
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$0 $0 $0 $0Design $0 $375,000$0
$0 $0 $0 $0Construction $0 $2,116,000$0
$0Expense Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,491,000$0
$0 $0 $0 $0Unsecured Grants $0 $2,491,000$0
$0Funding Source Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,491,000$0
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 78
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 350/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 350/524
Improve bicycle safety with a new west-east connection across Highway 99 to / from
the Interurban Trail.Benefit Improve bicycle safety with a new west-east connection across Highway 99 to / from
the Interurban Trail.
Description Addition of bike lanes along 224th St SW from 76th Ave W to Interurban Trail. The
project was ranked as MEDIUM PRIORITY in 2024 Transportation Plan.
$159,000
224TH ST SW BIKE
LANES FROM 76TH
AVE W TO
INTERURBAN TRAIL
THROUGH RE-STRIPING
PWT-102
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$0 $0 $0 $159,000Design and Construction $0 $0$0
$0Expense Total $0 $0 $159,000 $0 $0$0
$0 $0 $0 $159,000Unsecured Funding $0 $0$0
$0Funding Source Total $0 $0 $159,000 $0 $0$0
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 79
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 351/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 351/524
Completion of key missing link on both sides of the street, connecting to various
destination points (total of 1,100 LF).Benefit Completion of key missing link on both sides of the street, connecting to various
destination points (total of 1,100 LF).
Description Installation of sidewalk along 7th Ave. N from Daley St. to SR-524 / 196th St. SW
$1,053,000
7TH AVE WALKWAY
FROM DALEY ST TO SR-
524 / 196TH ST SW
PWT-105
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$0 $0 $0 $145,000Design $0 $0$0
$0 $0 $0 $0Construction $908,000 $0$0
$0Expense Total $0 $0 $145,000 $908,000 $0$0
$0 $0 $0 $14,500Fund 125 - REET $90,500 $0$0
$0 $0 $0 $14,500Fund 126 - REET $90,500 $0$0
$0 $0 $0 $116,000Unsecured Grants $727,000 $0$0
$0Funding Source Total $0 $0 $145,000 $908,000 $0$0
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 80
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 352/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 352/524
Improve pedesrtian safety and accessibility through the upgrade of curb ramp and
addition of bulb-outs (where feasible)Benefit Improve pedesrtian safety and accessibility through the upgrade of curb ramp and
addition of bulb-outs (where feasible)
Description Upgraded various curb ramps throughout the City (total of 41 curb ramps)
$1,845,000
PEDESTRIAN
IMPROVEMENTS (2028)
PWT-107
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$345,000 $0 $0 $0Design $0 $0$0
$0 $1,500,000 $0 $0Construction $0 $0$0
$345,000Expense Total $1,500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0$0
$345,000 $1,500,000 $0 $0Federal Grants $0 $0$0
$345,000Funding Source Total $1,500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0$0
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 81
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 353/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 353/524
FERRY RELATED
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 82
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 354/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 354/524
Reduce conflicts between ferry storage and access to local driveways.Benefit Reduce conflicts between ferry storage and access to local driveways.
Description Modify existing lane channelization on SR104 to add vehicle storage for ferry users.
WSDOT / WSF would be the lead agency for this project.
$441,000
FERRY STORAGE
IMPROVEMENTS FROM
PINE ST TO DAYTON ST
PWT-51
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$0 $0 $0 $66,000Design $0 $0$0
$0 $0 $0 $0Construction $375,000 $0$0
$0Expense Total $0 $0 $66,000 $375,000 $0$0
$0 $0 $0 $66,000Unsecured Funding $375,000 $0$0
$0Funding Source Total $0 $0 $66,000 $375,000 $0$0
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 83
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 355/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 355/524
TRAFFIC CALMING
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 84
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 356/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 356/524
Reduce vehicle speeds on City streets that qualify under the City's Traffic Calming
Policy.Benefit Reduce vehicle speeds on City streets that qualify under the City's Traffic Calming
Policy.
Description Install traffic calming devices along selected stretches throughout the City with
speeding issues (through completion of detailed evaluation). This ongoing annual
program started in 2015 and is included in the City's 6-year Transportation
Improvement Program (TIP) and Capital Improvement Program (CIP).
$22,000
TRAFFIC CALMING
PROGRAM
PWT-52
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$6,000 $6,000 $6,000 $6,000Design $6,000 $90,000$6,000
$54,000 $54,000 $54,000 $54,000Construction $54,000 $810,000$54,000
$60,000Expense Total $60,000 $60,000 $60,000 $60,000 $900,000$60,000
$60,000 $60,000 $60,000 $60,000Fund 126 - REET $60,000 $900,000$60,000
$60,000Funding Source Total $60,000 $60,000 $60,000 $60,000 $900,000$60,000
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 85
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 357/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 357/524
TRAFFIC PLANNING
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 86
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 358/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 358/524
Inventories and prioritizes ADA issues in the City right of way, as well as City buildings
and parks facilities (in order to improve accessibility for all users)Benefit Inventories and prioritizes ADA issues in the City right of way, as well as City buildings
and parks facilities (in order to improve accessibility for all users)
Description The 2017 Transition Plan completed an ADA evaluation and prioritization of the City’s
street right-of-way. This project will update the 2017 plan. The Plan will inventory
physical barriers preventing accessibility and develop updated actions and preliminary
cost estimates to address locations with non-ADA compliance.
$482,000
ADA TRANSITION
PLAN (RIGHT-OF-WAY)
UPDATE
PWT-53
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$0 $0 $0 $482,000Planning $0 $0$0
$0Expense Total $0 $0 $482,000 $0 $0$0
$0 $0 $0 $482,000Unsecured Funding $0 $0$0
$0Funding Source Total $0 $0 $482,000 $0 $0$0
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 87
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 359/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 359/524
Based upon existing and projected future land use and travel patterns, the
Transportation Plan describes roadway pedestrian, bicycle and transit infrastructure
and services and provides an assessment of existing and projected future
transportation needs. The Plan will establish the transportation priorities and guides
the development of the six-year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), Capital
Improvement Program (CIP), Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) and introduce Multimodal
Level of Service (MMLOS).
Benefit Based upon existing and projected future land use and travel patterns, the
Transportation Plan describes roadway pedestrian, bicycle and transit infrastructure
and services and provides an assessment of existing and projected future
transportation needs. The Plan will establish the transportation priorities and guides
the development of the six-year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), Capital
Improvement Program (CIP), Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) and introduce Multimodal
Level of Service (MMLOS).
Description The Transportation Plan serves as the transportation element of the City’s
Comprehensive Plan and was updated in 2024 in coordination with the 2024
Comprehensive Plan Update. A transportation impact fee was implemented in 2026.
$477,000
TRANSPORTATION
PLAN UPDATE
PWT-54
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$9,634 $0 $0 $0Planning $477,000 $0$0
$9,634Expense Total $0 $0 $0 $477,000 $0$0
$9,634 $0 $0 $0Fund 112 - Street (Gas Tax &
Multi-Modal)
$477,000 $0$0
$9,634Funding Source Total $0 $0 $0 $477,000 $0$0
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 88
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 360/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 360/524
Improve active transportation safety conditions along the Interurban Trail. The SR-104
@ 76th Ave W(current connection between City of Edmonds and City of Shoreline)
has some existing safety issues and this addition would provide users with a safer
alternate route.
Benefit Improve active transportation safety conditions along the Interurban Trail. The SR-104
@ 76th Ave W(current connection between City of Edmonds and City of Shoreline)
has some existing safety issues and this addition would provide users with a safer
alternate route.
Description Study to determine the feasibility of installing an overpass over SR-104, as part of an
Interurban Trail connection between City of Edmonds and City of Shoreline. The study
would include survey work (determination of ROW limits), conceptual plans, and
preliminary total project cost.
$435,000
SR-104 OVERPASS
FEASIBILITY STUDY
PWT-99
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$0 $0 $0 $435,000Planning $0 $0$0
$0Expense Total $0 $0 $435,000 $0 $0$0
$0 $0 $0 $435,000Unsecured Funding $0 $0$0
$0Funding Source Total $0 $0 $435,000 $0 $0$0
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 89
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 361/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 361/524
Improve active transportation safety along this collector street with an Average Daily
Traffic (ADT) of 4,500 vehicles per day.Benefit Improve active transportation safety along this collector street with an Average Daily
Traffic (ADT) of 4,500 vehicles per day.
Description Study to determine the feasibility of adding a multi-use path along Olympic View Dr.
from SR-524 / 196th St SW to 76th Ave W. The study will consist of survey work,
conceptual plans, and total preliminary project cost.
$164,000
OLYMPIC VIEW DR
ACTIVE
TRANSPORTATION
FEASIBILITY STUDY
PWT-100
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$0 $0 $0 $164,000Design & Construction $0 $0$0
$0Expense Total $0 $0 $164,000 $0 $0$0
$0 $0 $0 $164,000Unsecured Grants $0 $0$0
$0Funding Source Total $0 $0 $164,000 $0 $0$0
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 90
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 362/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 362/524
Improve active transportation safety along this principal arterial with an Average Daily
Traffic (ADT) of ~ 14,000 vehicles per day.Benefit Improve active transportation safety along this principal arterial with an Average Daily
Traffic (ADT) of ~ 14,000 vehicles per day.
Description Study to determine the feasibility of adding a multi-use path along 196th St SW from
Olympic View Dr. to 88th Ave W. The study will consist of survey work, conceptual
plans, and total preliminary project cost.
$164,000
196TH ST SW ACTIVE
TRANSPORTATION
FEASIBILITY STUDY
PWT-101
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$0 $0 $0 $0Planning $0 $164,000$0
$0Expense Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $164,000$0
$0 $0 $0 $0Unsecured Grants $0 $164,000$0
$0Funding Source Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $164,000$0
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 91
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 363/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 363/524
Improve intersection safety and traffic flows through the intersection.Benefit Improve intersection safety and traffic flows through the intersection.
Description Conversion of Main @ 9th and Walnut @ 9th to a mini-roundabout or traffic signal
(feasibility study to determine possible options)
$75,000
FEASIBILITY STUDY
MAIN @ 9TH AVE AND
WALNUT @ 9TH AVE
PWT-106
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$75,000 $0 $0 $0Design $0 $0$0
$75,000Expense Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$0
$37,500 $0 $0 $0Fund 126 - REET $0 $0$0
$37,500 $0 $0 $0Fund 125 - REET $0 $0$0
$75,000Funding Source Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$0
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 92
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 364/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 364/524
WATER
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 93
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 365/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 365/524
WATER SEPTEMBER 2026 DRAFT 1.4
#CFP Project 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032
2027-32
Total 2033-47 Grand Total
PWW-02 2027 Water Comprehensive Plan Update $582,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $582,000 $0 $582,000
PWW-05 Phase 16 Water Replacement Program (2028)$84,000 $2,940,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,024,000 $0 $3,024,000
PWW-06 Phase 17 Water Replacement Program (2029)$0 $616,000 $4,289,000 $0 $0 $0 $4,905,000 $0 $4,905,000
PWW-07 Phase 18 Water Replacement Program (2030)$0 $0 $641,000 $4,460,000 $0 $0 $5,101,000 $0 $5,101,000
PWW-08 Phase 19 Water Replacement Program (2031)$0 $0 $0 $666,000 $4,639,000 $0 $5,305,000 $0 $5,305,000
PWW-10 Phase 20 Water Replacement Program (2032)$0 $0 $0 $0 $693,000 $4,824,000 $5,517,000 $0 $5,517,000
PWW-20 Phase 21 Water Replacement Program (2033) &
Future Projects $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $721,000 $721,000 $115,476,000 $116,197,000
PWW-11 Yost & Seaview Reservoir Repairs & Upgrades $4,725,000 $1,200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,925,000 $0 $5,925,000
EXPENSE TOTAL $5,391,000 $4,756,000 $4,930,000 $5,126,000 $5,332,000 $5,545,000 $31,080,000 $115,476,000 $146,556,000
Funding Source 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032
2027-32
Total 2033-47 Grand Total
Fund 421 - Water Utility $5,391,000 $4,756,000 $4,930,000 $5,126,000 $5,332,000 $5,545,000 $31,080,000 $115,476,000 $146,556,000
FUNDING TOTAL $5,391,000 $4,756,000 $4,930,000 $5,126,000 $5,332,000 $5,545,000 $31,080,000 $115,476,000 $146,556,000
94
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 366/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 366/524
Maintain a high level of drinking water quality, improve overall system reliability,
decrease probability of breakages and leakage, improve fire fighting flows, and
decrease overall day to day maintenance costs.
Benefit Maintain a high level of drinking water quality, improve overall system reliability,
decrease probability of breakages and leakage, improve fire fighting flows, and
decrease overall day to day maintenance costs.
Description The existing water comprehensive plan was last updated in 2017 and is required to be
updated by the State Dept of Health (DOH) every 10 years. This project would be a
comprehensive evaluation of the City’s drinking water system, its replacement
program, and operations. It will include recommendations for improvements or
adjustments with recommended priorities for selecting future capital maintenance
projects.
$732,000
2027 WATER
COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN UPDATE
PWW-02
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - WATER
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$582,000 $0 $0 $0Design $0 $0$0
$582,000Expense Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$0
$582,000 $0 $0 $0Fund 421 - Water Utility $0 $0$0
$582,000Funding Source Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$0
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 95
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 367/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 367/524
Maintain a high level of drinking water quality, improve overall system reliability,
decrease probability of breakages and leakage, improve fire flows, and decrease
overall day to day maintenance costs.
Benefit Maintain a high level of drinking water quality, improve overall system reliability,
decrease probability of breakages and leakage, improve fire flows, and decrease
overall day to day maintenance costs.
Description Per the approved 2017 Water Comprehensive Plan, the projects will replace/maintain
pipe and related appurtenances at various locations throughout the City due to old
age, being undersized, need to increase flow or pressure, or more prone to breakage
due to its material properties.
$3.6 to $9.2 million/year
PHASE 16-36 WATER
REPLACEMENT
PROJECTS (2027-47)
PWW-05-10,20
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - WATER
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$54,000 $616,000 $641,000 $666,000Design $693,000 $15,003,000$720,000
$30,000 $2,940,000 $4,289,000 $4,460,000Construction $4,639,000 $100,473,000$4,825,000
$84,000Expense Total $3,556,000 $4,930,000 $5,126,000 $5,332,000 $115,476,000$5,545,000
$84,000 $3,556,000 $4,930,000 $5,126,000Fund 421 - Water Utility $5,332,000 $115,476,000$5,545,000
$84,000Funding Source Total $3,556,000 $4,930,000 $5,126,000 $5,332,000 $115,476,000$5,545,000
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 96
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 368/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 368/524
Maintain a high level of drinking water quality, improve overall system reliability,
decrease probability of leakage, retrofit structures so that they meet current structural
codes to improve their resiliency during earthquakes, and decrease overall day to day
maintenance costs.
Benefit Maintain a high level of drinking water quality, improve overall system reliability,
decrease probability of leakage, retrofit structures so that they meet current structural
codes to improve their resiliency during earthquakes, and decrease overall day to day
maintenance costs.
Description This work is being done to provide structural upgrades, repair leakages, and upgrades
to our two underground potable water storage reservoirs. Preliminary findings
completed in early 2023 were used to determine order of magnitude/preliminary costs
and next steps for the now planned repairs and upgrades project. The Yost Reservoir
report shows that it will need a major structural and seismic retrofit, plus repairs to
address leakage from the reservoir. The report for the Seaview Reservoir shows
similar issues as the Yost Reservoir, with a less serious leakage issue.
$10,003,000
YOST & SEAVIEW
RESERVOIR REPAIRS
& UPGRADES
PWW-11
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - WATER
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$4,725,000 $1,200,000 $0 $0Construction $0 $0$0
$4,725,000Expense Total $1,200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0$0
$4,725,000 $1,200,000 $0 $0Fund 421 - Water Utility $0 $0$0
$4,725,000Funding Source Total $1,200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0$0
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 97
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 369/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 369/524
STORMWATER
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 98
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 370/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 370/524
STORMWATER SEPTEMBER 2026 DRAFT 1.4
#CFP Project 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032
2027-32
Total 2033-47 Grand Total
PWD-13 Phase 6 Storm Maintenance Project (2026)$775,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $775,000 $0 $775,000
PWD-14 Phase 7 Storm Maintenance Project (2028)$235,000 $1,919,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,154,000 $0 $2,154,000
PWD-15 Phase 8 Storm Maintenance Project (2029)$0 $380,000 $1,975,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,355,000 $0 $2,355,000
PWD-16 Phase 9 Storm Maintenance Project (2030)$0 $0 $411,000 $2,053,000 $0 $0 $2,464,000 $0 $2,464,000
PWD-18 Phase 10 Storm Maintenance Project (2031)$0 $0 $0 $427,000 $2,135,000 $0 $2,562,000 $0 $2,562,000
PWD-25 Phase 11 Storm Maintenance Project (2032)$0 $0 $0 $0 $411,000 $2,220,000 $2,631,000 $0 $2,631,000
PWD-07 Phase 12 Storm Maintenance Project (2033) and Future
Projects $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $462,000 $462,000 $55,459,000 $55,921,000
EDMONDS MARSH ESTUARY RESTORATION
PWD-01 Edmonds Marsh Water Quality Improvements (phase 1) $436,928 $2,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $438,928 $0 $438,928
PWD-05 Edmonds Marsh Water Quality Improvements (phase 2) $421,840 $2,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $423,840 $0 $423,840
PWD-28 Edmonds Marsh Preliminary Design $525,000 $260,640 $0 $0 $0 $0 $785,640 $0 $785,640
PERRINVILLE CREEK BASIN
PWD-03 Perrinville Creek Flow Management Projects $112,000 $116,000 $120,000 $125,000 $130,000 $136,000 $739,000 $2,831,000 $3,570,000
PWD-04 P Lower Perrinville Creek Restoration Project $1,600,000 $1,150,000 $1,750,000 $0 $0 $0 $4,500,000 $0 $4,500,000
PWD-23 Perrinville Creek Basin Analysis Update $135,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $135,000 $0 $135,000
COMPLIANCE RELATED
PWD-17 Storm and Surface Water Comprehensive Plan $160,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $160,000 $0 $160,000
EXPENSE TOTAL $4,400,768 $3,829,640 $4,256,000 $2,605,000 $2,676,000 $2,818,000 $20,585,408 $58,290,000 $78,875,408
99
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 371/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 371/524
STORMWATER SEPTEMBER 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Funding Source 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032
2027-32
Total 2033-47 Grand Total
Federal Grants $470,000 $183,640 $0 $0 $0 $0 $653,640 $0 $653,640
Fund 422 - Stormwater Utility $2,288,928 $3,267,000 $4,256,000 $2,605,000 $2,676,000 $2,818,000 $17,910,928 $58,290,000 $76,200,928
Marsh Preservation Fund $55,000 $27,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $82,000 $0 $82,000
Private Citizen Cash Donation $0 $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $50,000 $0 $50,000
Secured Grants $686,840 $2,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $688,840 $0 $688,840
Unsecured Funding $900,000 $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,200,000 $0 $1,200,000
FUNDING TOTAL $4,400,768 $3,829,640 $4,256,000 $2,605,000 $2,676,000 $2,818,000 $20,585,408 $58,290,000 $78,875,408
100
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 372/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 372/524
Improve system reliability and capacity, decrease breakages, and decrease overall
day to day maintenance costs.Benefit Improve system reliability and capacity, decrease breakages, and decrease overall
day to day maintenance costs.
Description Annual storm drain replacement/maintenance projects. Projects propose to replace or
rehab storm drain infrastructure in several locations throughout the City. Locations of
work identified by City crews and staff via firsthand knowledge or video inspection
results. Much of Edmonds stormwater infrastructure is past its useful lifespan and
requires routine replacement or repair to preserve the function of the storm drain
system. Failure to conduct annual maintenance projects will increase chances of storm
drain system failures.
$1.1 to $4.8 million/year
PHASE 6-26 STORM
MAINTENANCE
PROJECTS (2026-46)
PWD-07,13-16,18, 25
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - STORMWATER
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$785,000 $1,898,000 $1,975,000 $2,053,000Construction $2,135,000 $46,228,000$2,220,000
$285,000 $401,000 $405,000 $411,000Design $427,000 $9,231,000$444,000
$1,070,000Expense Total $2,299,000 $2,380,000 $2,464,000 $2,562,000 $55,459,000$2,664,000
$1,070,000 $2,299,000 $2,380,000 $2,464,000Fund 422 - Stormwater Utility $2,562,000 $55,459,000$2,664,000
$1,070,000Funding Source Total $2,299,000 $2,380,000 $2,464,000 $2,562,000 $55,459,000$2,664,000
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 101
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 373/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 373/524
EDMONDS MARSH ESTUARY RESTORATION
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 102
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 374/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 374/524
Improve water quality of stormwater discharging into the Edmonds Marsh from the
west portions of SR-104 located near the marsh. The improvements will provide better
habitat for the return of salmon to the marsh.
Benefit Improve water quality of stormwater discharging into the Edmonds Marsh from the
west portions of SR-104 located near the marsh. The improvements will provide better
habitat for the return of salmon to the marsh.
Description The project will be improving water quality of stormwater runoff by replacing existing
catch basins along the west side of SR-104 funded via a DOE grant. The catch basins
will be replaced with catch basins that include water filter cartridges. Staff proposes
this effort in order to provide water quality mitigation for all discharges that directly
enter the marsh from these locations.
$615,000
EDMONDS MARSH
WATER QUALITY
IMPROVEMENTS
(PHASE 1)
PWD-01
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - STORMWATER
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$21,000 $0 $0 $0Design $0 $0$0
$415,928 $2,000 $0 $0Construction $0 $0$0
$436,928Expense Total $2,000 $0 $0 $0 $0$0
$198,928 $0 $0 $0Fund 422 - Stormwater Utility $0 $0$0
$238,000 $2,000 $0 $0Secured Grants $0 $0$0
$436,928Funding Source Total $2,000 $0 $0 $0 $0$0
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 103
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 375/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 375/524
Improve water quality of stormwater discharging into the Edmonds Marsh from the
east portions of SR-104 located near the marsh. The improvements will provide better
habitat for the return of salmon to the marsh.
Benefit Improve water quality of stormwater discharging into the Edmonds Marsh from the
east portions of SR-104 located near the marsh. The improvements will provide better
habitat for the return of salmon to the marsh.
Description The project will be improving water quality of stormwater runoff by replacing existing
catch basins along the east side of SR-104 via a state funded appropriation. The catch
basins will be replaced with catch basins that include water filter cartridges. Staff
proposes this effort in order to provide water quality mitigation for all discharges that
directly enter the marsh from these locations.
$565,000
EDMONDS MARSH
WATER QUALITY
IMPROVEMENTS
(PHASE 2)
PWD-05
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - STORMWATER
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$21,000 $0 $0 $0Design $0 $0$0
$400,840 $2,000 $0 $0Construction $0 $0$0
$421,840Expense Total $2,000 $0 $0 $0 $0$0
$73,000 $2,000 $0 $0Fund 422 - Stormwater Utility $0 $0$0
$348,840 $0 $0 $0Secured Grants $0 $0$0
$421,840Funding Source Total $2,000 $0 $0 $0 $0$0
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 104
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 376/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 376/524
Improves water quality and restores critical wetland and estuarine habitat while
establishing a feasible path toward long-term restoration of the Edmonds Marsh. The
preliminary design will also support future permitting, grant applications, final design,
and construction funding.
Benefit Improves water quality and restores critical wetland and estuarine habitat while
establishing a feasible path toward long-term restoration of the Edmonds Marsh. The
preliminary design will also support future permitting, grant applications, final design,
and construction funding.
Description Develop preliminary designs for restoring tidal connectivity and improving water quality
and wetland habitat within the Edmonds Marsh. The project will evaluate existing
conditions, hydraulic and ecological considerations, and restoration alternatives to
identify a preferred approach for future design and construction.
$825,650
EDMONDS MARSH
PRELIMINARY DESIGN
PWD-28
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - STORMWATER
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$525,000 $260,640 $0 $0Design $0 $0$0
$525,000Expense Total $260,640 $0 $0 $0 $0$0
$470,000 $183,640 $0 $0Federal Grants $0 $0$0
$55,000 $27,000 $0 $0Marsh Preservation Fund $0 $0$0
$0 $50,000 $0 $0Private Citizen Cash Donation $0 $0$0
$525,000Funding Source Total $260,640 $0 $0 $0 $0$0
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 105
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 377/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 377/524
PERRINVILLE CREEK BASIN
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 106
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 378/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 378/524
The project will reduce peak flows in Perrinville creek, improve fish passage and
decrease creek bed scour during peak flow events.Benefit The project will reduce peak flows in Perrinville creek, improve fish passage and
decrease creek bed scour during peak flow events.
Description Reducing scouring flows to reduce sediments load in Perrinville Creek was identified in
a previous basin report completed in 2015 as a critical element of restoring this creek
which has been significantly impacted by urban development. The projects funded by
this program are incremental steps toward recovering this stream run as adequate fish
habitat. These efforts have become even more critical given recent challenges around
the Perrinville Creek outfall area. This program is a fund for implementing projects
within the Perrinville Creek basin to reduce scour flows in the creek. It allows staff
flexibility to respond to ad-hoc opportunities such as rain garden cluster projects, or
ensure matching funds are available for chasing grant applications for flow reductions
projects.
$112,000 to $247,000/year
PERRINVILLE CREEK
FLOW MANAGEMENT
PROJECTS
PWD-03
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - STORMWATER
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$11,200 $11,600 $12,000 $12,500Design $13,000 $301,000$14,000
$100,800 $104,400 $108,000 $112,500Construction $117,000 $2,530,000$122,000
$112,000Expense Total $116,000 $120,000 $125,000 $130,000 $2,831,000$136,000
$112,000 $116,000 $120,000 $125,000Fund 422 - Stormwater Utility $130,000 $2,831,000$136,000
$112,000Funding Source Total $116,000 $120,000 $125,000 $130,000 $2,831,000$136,000
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 107
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 379/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 379/524
The project will reduce City maintenance needs in the future and improve fish
passage.Benefit The project will reduce City maintenance needs in the future and improve fish
passage.
Description The purpose of this project is to improve the environmental health of the creek
necessary to support fish habitat, and to restore the storm water capacity. The project
consists of the modifications to three structures that currently prevent fish passage and
are undersized for the flows on the creek, (1) the culvert at the BNSF track, remove
and replace with a fish-friendly culvert or bridge with adequate flow capacity, which will
be led and funded by BNSF and the Tulalip Tribes using grant funds, (2) return flow to
the creek between the high flow bypass structure and the BNSF culvert by blocking the
structure and restoring creek capacity and (3) culvert at Talbot Road, will be removed
and replaced with a fish-friendly culvert or bridge that provides adequate fish passage
and storm water flow capacity. This project will increase the resiliency of the watershed
by building the structures that mimic the natural channel performance necessary for
fish habitat and stormwater flow capacity. The project also includes time and effort to
research and apply for supplemental/additional funding sources for construction of the
Edmonds portions of the work (Items 2 & 3). Due to the project complexity and number
of stakeholders, the planning and design phase is estimated to be 2-years. Project
estimated costs are for installation of the structure and reestablishment of the creek
bed. Estimates do not include costs for relocation of existing utilities.
$4,600,000
LOWER PERRINVILLE
CREEK RESTORATION
PROJECT
PWD-04
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - STORMWATER
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$500,000 $50,000 $0 $0Design $0 $0$0
$1,100,000 $1,100,000 $1,750,000 $0Construction $0 $0$0
$1,600,000Expense Total $1,150,000 $1,750,000 $0 $0 $0$0
$700,000 $850,000 $1,750,000 $0Fund 422 - Stormwater Utility $0 $0$0
$900,000 $300,000 $0 $0Unsecured Funding $0 $0$0
$1,600,000Funding Source Total $1,150,000 $1,750,000 $0 $0 $0$0
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 108
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 380/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 380/524
Improve overall basin and stream health by using green stormwater infrastructure
methods. This will ensure that storm water runoff behaves as closely as possible to
natural conditions rather than simply being collected and conveyed downstream. This
includes infiltrating rainfall runoff as close as possible to where it fell. This will also
decrease stream peak flows, which will decrease stream erosion and improve the
overall stream habitat for aquatic life.
Benefit Improve overall basin and stream health by using green stormwater infrastructure
methods. This will ensure that storm water runoff behaves as closely as possible to
natural conditions rather than simply being collected and conveyed downstream. This
includes infiltrating rainfall runoff as close as possible to where it fell. This will also
decrease stream peak flows, which will decrease stream erosion and improve the
overall stream habitat for aquatic life.
Description City of Edmonds and Lynnwood joint project to supplement/update the Perrinville
Creek 2015 basin analysis that determined possible locations for projects that would
help decrease the peak storm flows during high rain events. Project will be updated to
reflect projects completed and also determine if there are other locations within the
basin to aid in the reduction of peak flows in the basin.
$649,200
PERRINVILLE CREEK
BASIN ANALYSIS
UPDATE
PWD-23
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - STORMWATER
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$135,000 $0 $0 $0Study $0 $0$0
$135,000Expense Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$0
$35,000 $0 $0 $0Fund 422 - Stormwater Utility $0 $0$0
$100,000 $0 $0 $0Secured Grants $0 $0$0
$135,000Funding Source Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$0
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 109
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 381/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 381/524
COMPLIANCE RELATED
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 110
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 382/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 382/524
A holistic summary of the City’s Stormwater system with recommended priorities for
selecting future capital maintenance and improvements projects.Benefit A holistic summary of the City’s Stormwater system with recommended priorities for
selecting future capital maintenance and improvements projects.
Description The City of Edmonds (City) owns and operates an extensive system of drainage pipes,
ditches, and other assets to convey stormwater runoff into streams, lakes, and Puget
Sound to prevent and minimize damage to private property, streets, and other
infrastructure. The City is faced with the challenge of conveying this runoff safely and
cost-effectively while preventing or minimizing the adverse impacts of high flows
(erosion, flooding, and sediment deposition) and of stormwater pollutants on water
quality and aquatic habitat. In addition, recent state and federal stormwater regulations
make it technically and financially challenging to address these issues while balancing
utility ratepayer costs. To proactively address these challenges and remain in
compliance with the State-mandated National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
Western Washington Phase II Municipal Stormwater Permit (NPDES Phase II permit)
and other increasing regulatory requirements, the City is updating its current
comprehensive storm and surface water management plan. This permit has and will
continue to have a significant impact on the workload and operational budget of both
the Engineering Division and the Storm Crews within the Public Works Department.
Per the State Department of Ecology, the plan will also include the work findings from
their required (Stormwater Management Action Plan) SMAP process of City drainage
watersheds. Project will also include recommendations for stormwater utilities rates to
be adjusted at the discretion of Council.
$733,000
STORM AND SURFACE
WATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
PWD-17
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - STORMWATER
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$160,000 $0 $0 $0Design $0 $0$0
$160,000Expense Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$0
$160,000 $0 $0 $0Fund 422 - Stormwater Utility $0 $0$0
$160,000Funding Source Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$0
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 111
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 383/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 383/524
SEWER
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 112
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 384/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 384/524
SEWER SEPTEMBER 2026 DRAFT 1.4
#CFP Project 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032
2027-32
Total 2033-47 Grand Total
PWS-02 2027 Sanitary Sewer Comprehensive Plan Update $350,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $350,000 $0 $350,000
PWS-05 Phase 13 Sewer Replacement (2026)$140,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $140,000 $0 $140,000
PWS-06 Phase 14 Sewer Replacement (2027)$2,800,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,800,000 $0 $2,800,000
PWS-07 Phase 15 Sewer Replacement (2028)$489,000 $2,740,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,229,000 $0 $3,229,000
PWS-08 Phase 16 Sewer Replacement (2029)$0 $425,000 $2,391,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,816,000 $0 $2,816,000
PWS-10 Phase 5-24 Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehabilitation (2028-2042) $0 $611,000 $636,000 $662,000 $688,000 $714,000 $3,311,000 $14,764,000 $18,075,000
PWS-12 Phase 17 Sewer Replacement (2030)$0 $0 $442,000 $2,487,000 $0 $0 $2,929,000 $0 $2,929,000
PWS-13 Phase 19 Sewer Replacement (2032) & Future Projects $0 $0 $0 $0 $478,000 $2,688,000 $3,166,000 $66,352,000 $69,518,000
PWS-14 Phase 18 Sewer Replacement (2031)$0 $0 $0 $460,000 $2,586,000 $0 $3,046,000 $0 $3,046,000
PWS-11 Lake Ballinger Sewer $0 $0 $1,000,000 $6,000,000 $0 $0 $7,000,000 $0 $7,000,000
EXPENSE TOTAL $3,779,000 $3,776,000 $4,469,000 $9,609,000 $3,752,000 $3,402,000 $28,787,000 $81,116,000 $109,903,000
Funding Source 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032
2027-32
Total 2033-47 Grand Total
Fund 423 - Sewer Utility $3,779,000 $3,776,000 $4,469,000 $9,609,000 $3,752,000 $3,402,000 $28,787,000 $81,116,000 $109,903,000
FUNDING TOTAL $3,779,000 $3,776,000 $4,469,000 $9,609,000 $3,752,000 $3,402,000 $28,787,000 $81,116,000 $109,903,000
113
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 385/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 385/524
Improve system reliability and capacity, decrease infiltration and inflow, decrease
breakages, and decrease overall day to day maintenance costs.Benefit Improve system reliability and capacity, decrease infiltration and inflow, decrease
breakages, and decrease overall day to day maintenance costs.
Description The existing sewer comprehensive plan was last updated in 2013 and is in need of an
update. This project would be a comprehensive evaluation of the City’s sewer system,
its replacement program and operations, with recommendations for improvements or
adjustments and recommended priorities for selecting future capital maintenance
projects.
$500,000
2027 SANITARY
SEWER
COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN UPDATE
PWS-02
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - SEWER
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$350,000 $0 $0 $0Design $0 $0$0
$350,000Expense Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$0
$350,000 $0 $0 $0Fund 423 - Sewer Utility $0 $0$0
$350,000Funding Source Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$0
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 114
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 386/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 386/524
Improve system reliability and capacity, decrease infiltration and inflow, decrease
breakages, and decrease overall day to day maintenance costs.Benefit Improve system reliability and capacity, decrease infiltration and inflow, decrease
breakages, and decrease overall day to day maintenance costs.
Description Per the approved 2013 Sewer Comprehensive Plan, the projects will replace/rehab
pipe and related appurtenances at various locations throughout the City due to old
age, being undersized, need to increase capacity, or more prone to breakage due to
its material properties.
$2.7 to $5.6 million/year
PHASE 14-32 SEWER
REPLACEMENT (2027-
47)
PWS-05-08,12,13, 14
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - SEWER
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$629,000 $425,000 $442,000 $460,000Design $478,000 $10,347,000$497,000
$2,810,000 $2,349,000 $2,391,000 $2,487,000Construction $2,586,000 $56,005,000$2,689,000
$3,439,000Expense Total $2,774,000 $2,833,000 $2,947,000 $3,064,000 $66,352,000$3,186,000
$3,439,000 $2,774,000 $2,833,000 $2,947,000Fund 423 - Sewer Utility $3,064,000 $66,352,000$3,186,000
$3,439,000Funding Source Total $2,774,000 $2,833,000 $2,947,000 $3,064,000 $66,352,000$3,186,000
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 115
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 387/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 387/524
Improve system reliability and capacity, decrease infiltration and inflow, decrease
breakages, and decrease overall day to day maintenance costs.Benefit Improve system reliability and capacity, decrease infiltration and inflow, decrease
breakages, and decrease overall day to day maintenance costs.
Description Per the approved 2013 Sewer Comprehensive plan and current video inspections of
sewer mains, the project will line existing sewer mains that are subject to root intrusion,
infiltration and inflow, and damage that can be repaired by this trenchless method.
2027 and 2028 funds will be combined with the Annual Sewer Replacement Program.
This is because the annual replacement rehab program for these years will be
focusing on pipe lining as well thereby requiring only 1 design and 1 construction
contract to administer.
$587,000 to $1,283,000/year
PHASE 5-24 CITYWIDE
CIPP SEWER
REHABILITATION
(2028-2042)
PWS-10
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - SEWER
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$0 $92,000 $96,000 $100,000Design $104,000 $2,152,000$108,000
$0 $519,000 $540,000 $562,000Construction $584,000 $12,612,000$606,000
$0Expense Total $611,000 $636,000 $662,000 $688,000 $14,764,000$714,000
$0 $611,000 $636,000 $662,000Fund 423 - Sewer Utility $688,000 $14,764,000$714,000
$0Funding Source Total $611,000 $636,000 $662,000 $688,000 $14,764,000$714,000
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 116
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 388/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 388/524
Improve system reliability and capacity, decrease infiltration and inflow, and decrease
overall day to day maintenance costs. Improved access will help ease maintenance
and access for emergencies, which will further decease any chance of potential sewer
spills into Lake Ballinger.
Benefit Improve system reliability and capacity, decrease infiltration and inflow, and decrease
overall day to day maintenance costs. Improved access will help ease maintenance
and access for emergencies, which will further decease any chance of potential sewer
spills into Lake Ballinger.
Description Per the approved 2013 Sewer Comprehensive plan and current video inspections of
sewer mains, the sewer pipe along Lake Ballinger will require additional flow capacity
in the near future. These improvements are needed to account for population growth,
reduce Infiltration and Inflow from the pipe and improve maintenance and emergency
access for this major trunk system.
$7,000,000
LAKE BALLINGER
SEWER
PWS-11
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - SEWER
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$0 $0 $1,000,000 $1,000,000Design $0 $0$0
$0 $0 $0 $5,000,000Construction $0 $0$0
$0Expense Total $0 $1,000,000 $6,000,000 $0 $0$0
$0 $0 $1,000,000 $6,000,000Fund 423 - Sewer Utility $0 $0$0
$0Funding Source Total $0 $1,000,000 $6,000,000 $0 $0$0
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 117
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 389/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 389/524
FACILITIES
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 118
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 390/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 390/524
FACILITIES SEPTEMBER 2026 DRAFT 1.4
#CFP Project 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032
2027-32
Total 2033-47 Grand Total
PWF-02 Cemetery Building $0 $0 $5,000 $2,500 $8,000 $0 $15,500 $0 $15,500
PWF-03 City Hall $0 $250,000 $65,000 $50,000 $50,000 $0 $415,000 $0 $415,000
PWF-04 Fishing Pier/Beach Ranger Station $0 $0 $3,000 $5,000 $3,500 $0 $11,500 $0 $11,500
PWF-05 Frances Anderson Center $325,000 $175,000 $125,000 $80,000 $80,000 $0 $785,000 $0 $785,000
PWF-09 Historic Log Cabin $0 $0 $2,000 $1,500 $3,000 $0 $6,500 $0 $6,500
PWF-11 Library $25,000 $20,000 $35,000 $25,000 $25,000 $0 $130,000 $0 $130,000
PWF-13 Old Public Works $0 $0 $24,519 $25,000 $25,000 $0 $74,519 $0 $74,519
PWF-14 Parks Maintenance Building $60,000 $20,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $0 $110,000 $0 $110,000
PWF-15 Public Safety $150,000 $0 $0 $80,000 $80,000 $0 $310,000 $0 $310,000
PWF-16 P Public Works Apron Repair $62,000 $62,000 $845,000 $0 $0 $0 $969,000 $0 $969,000
PWF-17 Wade James Theater $0 $0 $21,872 $25,000 $18,000 $0 $64,872 $0 $64,872
PWF-18 Yost Pool House $0 $0 $30,000 $25,000 $15,000 $0 $70,000 $0 $70,000
PWF-23 P Library Plaza Deck Waterproofing Project $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,900,000 $0 $4,900,000 $0 $4,900,000
PWF-25 P Police Station $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $0 $100,000 $0 $100,000
EXPENSE TOTAL $622,000 $527,000 $1,166,391 $329,000 $5,317,500 $0 $7,961,891 $0 $7,961,891
Funding Source 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032
2027-32
Total 2033-47 Grand Total
Fund 125 - REET $560,000 $465,000 $125,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,150,000 $0 $1,150,000
Fund 421 - Water Utility $20,667 $20,666 $281,667 $0 $0 $0 $323,000 $0 $323,000
Fund 422 - Stormwater Utility $20,667 $20,667 $281,666 $0 $0 $0 $323,000 $0 $323,000
Fund 423 - Sewer Utility $20,666 $20,667 $281,667 $0 $0 $0 $323,000 $0 $323,000
Unsecured Funding $0 $0 $196,391 $329,000 $5,317,500 $0 $5,842,891 $0 $5,842,891
FUNDING TOTAL $622,000 $527,000 $1,166,391 $329,000 $5,317,500 $0 $7,961,891 $0 $7,961,891
119
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 391/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 391/524
Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and efficient
operating conditions and to assure to the protection of the asset throughout an
expected lifespan
Benefit Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and efficient
operating conditions and to assure to the protection of the asset throughout an
expected lifespan
Description This small structure houses the Edmonds Cemetery funerary services and the
cemetery Sextant office. The building is in relatively good condition and has little
deferred maintenance backlog. Minor security and communications updates will be
needed as technology dictates.
Projects:
Minor repair and maintenance, heating system upgrade
$5,000 (2029)
CEMETERY BUILDING
PWF-02
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - FACILITIES
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$0 $0 $5,000 $2,500Construction\Professional
Services
$8,000 $0$0
$0Expense Total $0 $5,000 $2,500 $8,000 $0$0
$0 $0 $5,000 $2,500Unsecured Funding $8,000 $0$0
$0Funding Source Total $0 $5,000 $2,500 $8,000 $0$0
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 120
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 392/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 392/524
Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and efficient
operating conditions and to assure to the protection of the asset throughout an
expected lifespan.
Benefit Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and efficient
operating conditions and to assure to the protection of the asset throughout an
expected lifespan.
Description City Hall was built in 1979 and was operated as a private business office center until
the City purchased and renovated the building in the 1990s. The City has operated
Edmonds City Hall from this location since the renovations were completed. The
building is in near original condition and needs substantial repair and maintenance.
Projects: All old equipment needs replacement, including mechanical, electrical and
plumbing systems, seismic updates, lobby remodel, entry awning re-glazing, Interior,
ADA accessibility improvements, and aging air handling unit replacement or
refurbishing.
2028: Upgrade/replace mechanical, electrical, and plumbing systems
$250,000 (2028)
CITY HALL
PWF-03
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - FACILITIES
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$0 $250,000 $65,000 $50,000Construction\Professional
Services
$50,000 $0$0
$0Expense Total $250,000 $65,000 $50,000 $50,000 $0$0
$0 $250,000 $0 $0Fund 125 - REET $0 $0$0
$0 $0 $65,000 $50,000Unsecured Funding $50,000 $0$0
$0Funding Source Total $250,000 $65,000 $50,000 $50,000 $0$0
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 121
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 393/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 393/524
Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and efficient
operating conditions and to assure to the protection of the asset throughout an
expected lifespan.
Benefit Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and efficient
operating conditions and to assure to the protection of the asset throughout an
expected lifespan.
Description The Pier was recently renovated and is generally in good condition. The Beach Ranger
Office is a 1200 square foot office and restroom facility located near the east end of the
pier. There are season programs and visitor support functions that operate out of this
facility.
Ranger office is mothballed currently and will be re-open if budgets allow, restroom
facilities are still functional.
$3,000 (2029)
FISHING PIER/BEACH
RANGER STATION
PWF-04
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - FACILITIES
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$0 $0 $3,000 $5,000Construction\Professional
Services
$3,500 $0$0
$0Expense Total $0 $3,000 $5,000 $3,500 $0$0
$0 $0 $3,000 $5,000Unsecured Funding $3,500 $0$0
$0Funding Source Total $0 $3,000 $5,000 $3,500 $0$0
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 122
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 394/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 394/524
Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and efficient
operating conditions and to assure to the protection of the asset throughout an
expected lifespan.
Benefit Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and efficient
operating conditions and to assure to the protection of the asset throughout an
expected lifespan.
Description The Frances Anderson Center serves as the City’s main recreation center offering arts,
athletic and cultural programing year round. Due to the age and high usage of the
building there are many building systems that are in need of replacement or
restoration. Projects: replacement of heating boilers with electric alternatives that will
add ventilation, cooling and heating; investment grade audit approved by City Council;
window replacements; elevator replacement; ADA accessible door closures; plumbing
drainage collector, restroom remodels (w/ gender neutral consideration). Replacement
of all plumbing fixtures, addition of building security card readers, building HVAC &
controls to maximize efficiency, fire sprinkler replacement, and Clean Building Act
compliance efforts will be addressed by IGA. Areas of aging or damaged roof will also
be replaced.
2027-28: Upgrade HVAC and controls, fix roof
2029: Replace plumbing fixtures
$325,000 (2027)
FRANCES ANDERSON
CENTER
PWF-05
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - FACILITIES
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$325,000 $175,000 $125,000 $80,000Construction\Professional
Services
$80,000 $0$0
$325,000Expense Total $175,000 $125,000 $80,000 $80,000 $0$0
$325,000 $175,000 $125,000 $0Fund 125 - REET $0 $0$0
$0 $0 $0 $80,000Unsecured Funding $80,000 $0$0
$325,000Funding Source Total $175,000 $125,000 $80,000 $80,000 $0$0
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 123
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 395/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 395/524
Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and efficient
operating conditions and to assure to the protection of the asset throughout an
expected lifespan.
Benefit Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and efficient
operating conditions and to assure to the protection of the asset throughout an
expected lifespan.
Description This Historic log cabin is home to the Edmonds Chamber of Commerce visitor center,
the structure was a purpose built cabin from the turn of the century. The structure is
professionally maintained on a three year cycle by a log cabin specialist and requires
only minor maintenance and upkeep annually.
Projects: new thick cut shingle replacement, chinking of exterior log finish, interior
lighting.
$2,000 (2029)
HISTORIC LOG CABIN
PWF-09
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - FACILITIES
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$0 $0 $2,000 $1,500Construction\Professional
Services
$3,000 $0$0
$0Expense Total $0 $2,000 $1,500 $3,000 $0$0
$0 $0 $2,000 $1,500Unsecured Funding $3,000 $0$0
$0Funding Source Total $0 $2,000 $1,500 $3,000 $0$0
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 124
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 396/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 396/524
Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and efficient
operating conditions and to assure to the protection of the asset throughout an
expected lifespan.
Benefit Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and efficient
operating conditions and to assure to the protection of the asset throughout an
expected lifespan.
Description The Edmonds Library is operated by the Sno-Isle Library system with exception of the
Second floor Plaza room rental space. The library is a 19,000 square foot building built
in 1982. The building hosts special event rentals and daily Library programming and
community services. This is one of the City’s most heavily used buildings by the public
and has significant deferred maintenance needs, including the building façade, roof
and plaza deck waterproofing.
Projects: Exterior façade and code updates, ADA access device upgrades or
replacement, gender inclusive public restroom creation, Plaza Room
restroom/changing facilities, Elevator modernization, building masonry restoration or
building cladding, exterior stairway restoration, HVAC ventilation fan assessment,
building breezeway remodel, roof replacement.
2027: elevator upgrade
$25,000 (2027)
LIBRARY
PWF-11
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - FACILITIES
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$25,000 $20,000 $35,000 $25,000Construction\Professional
Services
$25,000 $0$0
$25,000Expense Total $20,000 $35,000 $25,000 $25,000 $0$0
$25,000 $20,000 $0 $0Fund 125 - REET $0 $0$0
$0 $0 $35,000 $25,000Unsecured Funding $25,000 $0$0
$25,000Funding Source Total $20,000 $35,000 $25,000 $25,000 $0$0
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 125
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 397/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 397/524
Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and efficient
operating conditions and to assure to the protection of the asset throughout an
expected lifespan.
Benefit Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and efficient
operating conditions and to assure to the protection of the asset throughout an
expected lifespan.
Description This facility was built in 1965 to house the City’s Public Works Department, the building
was converted in 1995 to tenant space and City storage, as well as Edmonds Police
large evidence storage. This is a vital piece of property adjacent to the Waste Water
Treatment Plant, and could be converted for utility use if regulatory requirements
dictate. Building is primarily used as storage and will need some updates to maintain
current operational readiness.
Projects: HVAC replacements, roll-up door replacement, security camera system.
$24,519 (2029)
OLD PUBLIC WORKS
PWF-13
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - FACILITIES
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$0 $0 $24,519 $25,000Construction\Professional
Services
$25,000 $0$0
$0Expense Total $0 $24,519 $25,000 $25,000 $0$0
$0 $0 $24,519 $25,000Unsecured Funding $25,000 $0$0
$0Funding Source Total $0 $24,519 $25,000 $25,000 $0$0
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 126
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 398/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 398/524
Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and efficient
operating conditions and to assure to the protection of the asset throughout an
expected lifespan.
Benefit Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and efficient
operating conditions and to assure to the protection of the asset throughout an
expected lifespan.
Description This facility was built in 1967 by Ed Huntley who at the time was the City Facilities
supervisor. The 4800 square foot facility now houses all City Facility Operations
staff(11) and all of Park and Rec Parks Maintenance Staff(12+ seasonal help) This
Facility is home to the City Carpentry Shop, Key Shop, City Flower program, Parks
engine repair shop and Parks and Facilities maintenance supply storage as well as
Parks and Facilities Manager offices. This Facility is near end of life and is undersized
to support the departmental staffing that are assigned to this facility.
Projects: maintenance and repair to maintain operational capacity, ADA restroom
updates, Shop/offices floor replacements, eventual remodel and existing facilities to
meet operational needs, additional safety and security systems.
2027: restroom upgrade
2028: floor replacements
$60,000 (2027)
PARKS MAINTENANCE
BUILDING
PWF-14
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - FACILITIES
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$60,000 $20,000 $10,000 $10,000Construction\Professional
Services
$10,000 $0$0
$60,000Expense Total $20,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $0$0
$60,000 $20,000 $0 $0Fund 125 - REET $0 $0$0
$0 $0 $10,000 $10,000Unsecured Funding $10,000 $0$0
$60,000Funding Source Total $20,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $0$0
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 127
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 399/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 399/524
Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and efficient
operating conditions and to assure to the protection of the asset throughout an
expected lifespan.
Benefit Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and efficient
operating conditions and to assure to the protection of the asset throughout an
expected lifespan.
Description The Public Safety building houses Edmonds Police Department, Edmonds Municipal
Court and the City Council Chambers. The building was built in 1999 encompassing
30,000 square feet of office, court and municipal government uses. The building
houses one of the City emergency operations centers, large police training, simulator
facilities and evidence processing and storage. The building has had minimal system
updates over its life and has a significant amount of deferred maintenance and should
be retrofitted with new fire sprinklers.
Projects: air handler and outdoor ventilation unit replacements, elevator modernization,
sleeping room remodel and gender specific/neutral accommodations, gender inclusive
public restrooms, court's flat roof replacement. Refurbishment of building VAV
ventilation boxes.
2027: roof replacement, elevator interior upgrade
$150,000 (2027)
PUBLIC SAFETY
PWF-15
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - FACILITIES
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$150,000 $0 $0 $80,000Construction\Professional
Services
$80,000 $0$0
$150,000Expense Total $0 $0 $80,000 $80,000 $0$0
$150,000 $0 $0 $0Fund 125 - REET $0 $0$0
$0 $0 $0 $80,000Unsecured Funding $80,000 $0$0
$150,000Funding Source Total $0 $0 $80,000 $80,000 $0$0
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 128
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 400/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 400/524
A new foundation, re-built apron and pavement transtion are necessary to address
current and worsening access issues to existing vehicle bays. This work will also
preserve the existing buried utilities beneath the apron.
Benefit A new foundation, re-built apron and pavement transtion are necessary to address
current and worsening access issues to existing vehicle bays. This work will also
preserve the existing buried utilities beneath the apron.
Description The existing concrete apron adjacent to the equipment bays at the Public Works
Facilities building is settling due to poor fill/soil conditions beneath the apron. The
settlement is creating access issues to the bays and will eventually impact buried
utilities beneath the apron. A new foundation, re-built apron and pavement transition
are necessary to address the problem.
$1,010,000
PUBLIC WORKS
APRON REPAIR
PWF-16
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - FACILITIES
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$62,000 $62,000 $0 $0Design $0 $0$0
$0 $0 $845,000 $0Construction $0 $0$0
$62,000Expense Total $62,000 $845,000 $0 $0 $0$0
$20,667 $20,666 $281,667 $0Fund 421 - Water Utility $0 $0$0
$20,667 $20,667 $281,666 $0Fund 422 - Stormwater Utility $0 $0$0
$20,666 $20,667 $281,667 $0Fund 423 - Sewer Utility $0 $0$0
$62,000Funding Source Total $62,000 $845,000 $0 $0 $0$0
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 129
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 401/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 401/524
Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and efficient
operating conditions and to assure to the protection of the asset throughout an
expected lifespan.
Benefit Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and efficient
operating conditions and to assure to the protection of the asset throughout an
expected lifespan.
Description This community theater was built by the Driftwood Players theater group in 1967 and
was deeded to City ownership at a later date. The facility is 6,300 square feet in size
and houses the Driftwood Players theatrical performances and City meetings. The
City’s maintenance responsibilities are limited to large infrastructure, parking lot,
roofing, and grounds.
Projects: parking lot repair and recoating, gutter replacement, fire alarm replacement,
$21,872 (2029)
WADE JAMES THEATER
PWF-17
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - FACILITIES
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$0 $0 $21,872 $25,000Construction\Professional
Services
$18,000 $0$0
$0Expense Total $0 $21,872 $25,000 $18,000 $0$0
$0 $0 $21,872 $25,000Unsecured Funding $18,000 $0$0
$0Funding Source Total $0 $21,872 $25,000 $18,000 $0$0
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 130
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 402/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 402/524
Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and efficient
operating conditions and to assure to the protection of the asset throughout an
expected lifespan.
Benefit Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and efficient
operating conditions and to assure to the protection of the asset throughout an
expected lifespan.
Description This recreational facility houses the City’s aquatic programing and some Parks and
Recreation programs. Built in 1971 the pool house historically was only operated
seasonally. The tenant run aquatic programing is year round lap and team aquatic
activities and will continue to support summer open swim programing. The facility
requires minimal maintenance to remain operational and is subject to tenant lease
terms of use.
Projects: security updates, plumbing fixture updates, exterior door replacements,
operational repair and maintenance to accommodate 365 operations, exterior lighting
replacements, shower tile replacement.
$30,000 (2029)
YOST POOL HOUSE
PWF-18
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - FACILITIES
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$0 $0 $30,000 $25,000Construction\Professional
Services
$15,000 $0$0
$0Expense Total $0 $30,000 $25,000 $15,000 $0$0
$0 $0 $30,000 $25,000Unsecured Funding $15,000 $0$0
$0Funding Source Total $0 $30,000 $25,000 $15,000 $0$0
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 131
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 403/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 403/524
Maintaining building in operational and safe condition, in order to maintain partnership
with Sno-Isle Library system. Preservation of the City’s physical assets in appropriate
condition vs. the age of the facility and historic capital investment.
Benefit Maintaining building in operational and safe condition, in order to maintain partnership
with Sno-Isle Library system. Preservation of the City’s physical assets in appropriate
condition vs. the age of the facility and historic capital investment.
Description The Library Plaza Deck is essentially a green roof on the second floor of the Edmonds
Sno-Isle Library. The deck surface was waterproofed and remodeled in 2003, since
that project continuous water intrusion has occurred through the waterproof
membrane. This water intrusion has been successfully mitigated over the years and
has not been deemed a project of significance previously. In 2018 Western Specialty
Contractors inspected the water intrusion and offered an initial ROM price to demolish
and waterproof the existing plaza deck. Rebuilding the plaza deck and replacement of
landscape, planters, grass, pavement, flashing and hand railings would be a separate
construction project. The Parks Director in 2018 offered an estimate to replace
landscaping and irrigations systems. In 2021 a draft structural report was performed by
MLA Engineering to discover any structural consequences from the years of water
intrusion, building was deemed structurally sound and water intrusion not factoring in
to building structural stability.
$4,900,000 (2031)
LIBRARY PLAZA DECK
WATERPROOFING
PROJECT
PWF-23
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - FACILITIES
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$0 $0 $0 $0Construction\Professional
Services
$4,900,000 $0$0
$0Expense Total $0 $0 $0 $4,900,000 $0$0
$0 $0 $0 $0Unsecured Funding $4,900,000 $0$0
$0Funding Source Total $0 $0 $0 $4,900,000 $0$0
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 132
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 404/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 404/524
Benefit
Description Feasibility Study to relocate the existing Police Station or create a new substation.
Design, location and funding TBD.
$100,000 (2031)
POLICE STATION
PWF-25
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - FACILITIES
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$0 $0 $0 $0Design $100,000 $0$0
$0Expense Total $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $0$0
$0 $0 $0 $0Unsecured Funding $100,000 $0$0
$0Funding Source Total $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $0$0
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 133
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 405/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 405/524
WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 134
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 406/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 406/524
WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT SEPTEMBER 2026 DRAFT 1.4
#CFP Project 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032
2027-32
Total 2033-47 Grand Total
PWP-01 WWTP Annual Capital Replacement In-House Projects $1,000,000 $1,250,000 $1,250,000 $1,300,000 $1,300,000 $0 $6,100,000 $0 $6,100,000
PWP-04 Nutrient Removal Project $650,000 $5,000,000 $5,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $10,650,000 $0 $10,650,000
PWP-06 Joint Sealant $60,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $60,000 $0 $60,000
PWP-08 Gasification Bypass (Class A Solids Production)$300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000 $0 $300,000
PWP-10 VFD Upgrades $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $250,000 $0 $250,000
PWP-11 Primary Clarifier 2 Rehab $300,000 $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $600,000 $0 $600,000
PWP-13 ODS (Primary Sludge) Pump Replacement $350,000 $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $600,000 $0 $600,000
PWP-14 Chlorine Contact Channel Sluice Gates Replacement $0 $375,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $375,000 $0 $375,000
PWP-16 P NPW Pumping System Improvements $75,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $75,000 $0 $75,000
PWP-18 LPA Blower 303 and 305 Rehab $50,000 $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $0 $100,000
PWP-19 600 Bldg Electrical Rehab $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $250,000 $0 $250,000
PWP-20 600 Bldg Air Quality Rehab/Upgrade $125,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $125,000 $0 $125,000
PWP-21 Secondary Clarifier 2 Rehab $50,000 $800,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $850,000 $0 $850,000
PWP-22 Instrumentation Upgrades and Replacement Program $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $0 $0 $800,000 $0 $800,000
PWP-23 Potable Water System Repair $25,000 $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $125,000 $0 $125,000
PWP-24 Plant HVAC and Odor Control Upgrades $37,500 $37,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $75,000 $0 $75,000
PWP-25 Valve Replacement program $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $1,500,000 $3,500,000 $5,000,000
PWP-26 Electrical Improvement Project $200,000 $200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $400,000 $0 $400,000
PWP-27 Disinfection System Rehab $500,000 $500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,000,000 $0 $1,000,000
135
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 407/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 407/524
WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT SEPTEMBER 2026 DRAFT 1.4
#CFP Project 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032
2027-32
Total 2033-47 Grand Total
PWP-28 P 400 Building Electrical System Repair and Replace $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $250,000 $0 $250,000
PWP-29 Secondary Clarifier #1 Floor Replacement $250,000 $750,000 $750,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,750,000 $0 $1,750,000
PWP-30 P SCADA and Control Systems Modernization $1,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,000,000 $0 $1,000,000
EXPENSE TOTAL $6,172,500 $10,062,500 $7,450,000 $1,750,000 $1,550,000 $250,000 $27,235,000 $3,500,000 $30,735,000
Funding Source 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032
2027-32
Total 2033-47 Grand Total
Fund 423 - Sewer Utility $3,135,013 $5,110,744 $3,783,855 $888,825 $787,245 $126,975 $13,832,657 $1,777,650 $15,610,307
City of Shoreline $585,770 $954,931 $707,005 $166,075 $147,095 $23,725 $2,584,602 $332,150 $2,916,752
Mountlake Terrace $1,430,168 $2,331,481 $1,726,165 $405,475 $359,135 $57,925 $6,310,350 $810,950 $7,121,300
Olympic View Water/Sewer District $1,021,549 $1,665,344 $1,232,975 $289,625 $256,525 $41,375 $4,507,393 $579,250 $5,086,643
FUNDING TOTAL $6,172,500 $10,062,500 $7,450,000 $1,750,000 $1,550,000 $250,000 $27,235,000 $3,500,000 $30,735,000
136
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 408/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 408/524
This project ensures that critical infrastructure is maintained and equipment is
replaced in order to reduce risk to the City.Benefit This project ensures that critical infrastructure is maintained and equipment is
replaced in order to reduce risk to the City.
Description The WWTP Annual Capital Replacement In-House Projects is intended to maintain
infrastructure and equipment to ensure that the treatment plant is well maintained.
$1,000,000 (2026)
WWTP ANNUAL
CAPITAL
REPLACEMENT IN-
HOUSE PROJECTS
PWP-01
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - TREATMENT PLANT
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$200,000 $250,000 $250,000 $300,000Design $300,000 $0$0
$800,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000Construction $1,000,000 $0$0
$1,000,000Expense Total $1,250,000 $1,250,000 $1,300,000 $1,300,000 $0$0
$507,900 $634,875 $634,875 $660,270Fund 423 - Sewer Utility $660,270 $0$0
$231,700 $289,625 $289,625 $301,210Mountlake Terrace $301,210 $0$0
$165,500 $206,875 $206,875 $215,150Olympic View Water/Sewer
District
$215,150 $0$0
$94,900 $118,625 $118,625 $123,370City of Shoreline $123,370 $0$0
$1,000,000Funding Source Total $1,250,000 $1,250,000 $1,300,000 $1,300,000 $0$0
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 137
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 409/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 409/524
This project will protect Puget Sound by reducing the amount of total nitrogen
discharged and ensuring continued compliance with water quality requirements while
still maintaining treatment capacity to support projected community growth over the
next decade.
Benefit This project will protect Puget Sound by reducing the amount of total nitrogen
discharged and ensuring continued compliance with water quality requirements while
still maintaining treatment capacity to support projected community growth over the
next decade.
Description The WA Dept of Ecology will reissue the City’s NPDES permit with new nutrient
monitoring requirements that will ultimately lead to stringent effluent limits for total
nitrogen. The wastewater treatment plant’s existing process was not designed for
nitrogen removal and will require significant modifications to meet these new
requirements. This capital improvement project will fund the engineering, design, and
construction as necessary to achieve compliance while also providing adequate
capacity to accommodate projected service-area growth over the next decade.
$10,650,000
NUTRIENT REMOVAL
PROJECT
PWP-04
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - TREATMENT PLANT
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$650,000 $0 $0 $0Design $0 $0$0
$0 $5,000,000 $5,000,000 $0Construction $0 $0$0
$650,000Expense Total $5,000,000 $5,000,000 $0 $0 $0$0
$330,135 $2,539,500 $2,539,500 $0Fund 423 - Sewer Utility $0 $0$0
$150,605 $1,158,500 $1,158,500 $0Mountlake Terrace $0 $0$0
$107,575 $827,500 $827,500 $0Olympic View Water/Sewer
District
$0 $0$0
$61,685 $474,500 $474,500 $0City of Shoreline $0 $0$0
$650,000Funding Source Total $5,000,000 $5,000,000 $0 $0 $0$0
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 138
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 410/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 410/524
The project will maintain the infrastructure and repair several existing leaks.Benefit The project will maintain the infrastructure and repair several existing leaks.
Description This project will be undertaken in 2027 and is intended to maintain infrastructure and
equipment to ensure that the treatment plant is structurally sound and well maintained.
The Treatment Plant is constructed primarily of concrete. Cracks or improperly sealed
joints can result in leaks and serious water intrusion that may damage equipment or
compromise building integrity.
$60,000
JOINT SEALANT
PWP-06
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - TREATMENT PLANT
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$60,000 $0 $0 $0Construction $0 $0$0
$60,000Expense Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$0
$30,474 $0 $0 $0Fund 423 - Sewer Utility $0 $0$0
$13,902 $0 $0 $0Mountlake Terrace $0 $0$0
$9,930 $0 $0 $0Olympic View Water/Sewer
District
$0 $0$0
$5,694 $0 $0 $0City of Shoreline $0 $0$0
$60,000Funding Source Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$0
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 139
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 411/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 411/524
Allow solids handling system redundancy and the ability to run the dryer unit
independently in the event of a gasification system failure or repair. The dryer is
capable of producing Class A biosolids, which would negate the need for temporary
hauling and disposal of wet cake at a rate of up to $200,000/month.
Benefit Allow solids handling system redundancy and the ability to run the dryer unit
independently in the event of a gasification system failure or repair. The dryer is
capable of producing Class A biosolids, which would negate the need for temporary
hauling and disposal of wet cake at a rate of up to $200,000/month.
Description This allows the ability to continue production of class A solids if/when the gasification
system is shut down for repairs or preventative maintenance. The ability to produce
and haul class A solids will eliminate a temporary but substantial cost increase hauling
as this product is essentially the same in volume as biochar or concentrated minerals
and is accepted at the local transfer station whereas if this option is not available,
sludge will need to be loaded into trailers and hauled to Oregon as was done during
the Carbon Recovery Project at a cost of up to $200,000 per month. This redundant
solids processing mode was an option to add to the Carbon Recovery Project and was
rejected by previous administration. Along with the savings in hauling costs, there will
be no additional odor issues or daily sludge truck traffic in the adjacent neighborhood.
$300,000
GASIFICATION
BYPASS (CLASS A
SOLIDS PRODUCTION)
PWP-08
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - TREATMENT PLANT
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$50,000 $0 $0 $0Design $0 $0$0
$250,000 $0 $0 $0Construction $0 $0$0
$300,000Expense Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$0
$152,370 $0 $0 $0Fund 423 - Sewer Utility $0 $0$0
$69,510 $0 $0 $0Mountlake Terrace $0 $0$0
$49,650 $0 $0 $0Olympic View Water/Sewer
District
$0 $0$0
$28,470 $0 $0 $0City of Shoreline $0 $0$0
$300,000Funding Source Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$0
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 140
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 412/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 412/524
To keep critical equipment reliable and in working condition.Benefit To keep critical equipment reliable and in working condition.
Description The WWTP has several VFD's (variable frequency drives) on various critical
equipment influent pumps, effluent pumps, RAS/WAS pumps, aeration blowers, etc.
These VFD's have an expected useful life of 15-20 years. Several of the VFD's here at
the plant range in age between 20-30 years old. There have already been some
failures and replacements made. These outdated VFD's need to be replaced to avoid a
catastrophic failure event that could happen to these weakened state VFD's for any
number of reasons, including abrupt starting and stopping due to power bumps/loss,
switching from grid to generator power supply or just a parts failure. If multiple critical
components fail simultaneously, then the plant may lose it's ability to treat wastewater
that meets NPDES permit requirements resulting in pollution of our receiving waters
and possible fines by our governing agency.
$500,000
VFD UPGRADES
PWP-10
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - TREATMENT PLANT
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$50,000 $0 $0 $0Design $0 $0$0
$200,000 $0 $0 $0Construction $0 $0$0
$250,000Expense Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$0
$126,975 $0 $0 $0Fund 423 - Sewer Utility $0 $0$0
$57,925 $0 $0 $0Mountlake Terrace $0 $0$0
$41,375 $0 $0 $0Olympic View Water/Sewer
District
$0 $0$0
$23,725 $0 $0 $0City of Shoreline $0 $0$0
$250,000Funding Source Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$0
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 141
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 413/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 413/524
Improve reliability of critical infrastructure as it is currently out of service and in a state
of imminent failure. Ensure WWTP’s ability to treat wastewater up to its rated capacity
and meet discharge permit requirements. Closing off dead corners will improve
operational efficiency.
Benefit Improve reliability of critical infrastructure as it is currently out of service and in a state
of imminent failure. Ensure WWTP’s ability to treat wastewater up to its rated capacity
and meet discharge permit requirements. Closing off dead corners will improve
operational efficiency.
Description Primary Clarifier #2 cage, center column, feedwell, corner sweeps, weir,
counterweight, skimming device and rake arms need replacement due to severe
corrosion. The steel has not been replaced since the original construction. Baffles will
be installed to block-off corner dead zones to create a more circular flow pattern. The
limited access will require that pieces be assembled inside the tank. The concrete
structure also needs to be inspected and repaired as needed as corrosion of the
concrete in spots has led to exposed rebar and may have compromised the structural
integrity of the clarifier. The project was delayed in 2024 and a carryforward budget
amendment will move funds to 2027-28 to complete project.
$600,000
PRIMARY CLARIFIER 2
REHAB
PWP-11
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - TREATMENT PLANT
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$100,000 $0 $0 $0Design $0 $0$0
$200,000 $300,000 $0 $0Construction $0 $0$0
$300,000Expense Total $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0$0
$152,370 $152,370 $0 $0Fund 423 - Sewer Utility $0 $0$0
$69,510 $69,510 $0 $0Mountlake Terrace $0 $0$0
$49,650 $49,650 $0 $0Olympic View Water/Sewer
District
$0 $0$0
$28,470 $28,470 $0 $0City of Shoreline $0 $0$0
$300,000Funding Source Total $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0$0
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 142
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 414/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 414/524
Improve reliability, redundancy and efficiency of the primary sludge and scum pumps
by replacing 30+ year old pumps and improving piping system.Benefit Improve reliability, redundancy and efficiency of the primary sludge and scum pumps
by replacing 30+ year old pumps and improving piping system.
Description The ODS pumps are over 30 years old and are at the end of their useful life. The
maintenance, reliability and efficiency of the primary sludge pumping system would be
greatly improved by replacing the current diaphragm pumps with progressive cavity
pumps. During this pump replacement, piping modifications would also be done to
allow pumps to support more than one clarifier, improving system redundancy along
with reliability. The project was delayed in 2025 and will carry forward into 2027.
$600,000
ODS (PRIMARY
SLUDGE) PUMP
REPLACEMENT
PWP-13
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - TREATMENT PLANT
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$350,000 $250,000 $0 $0Construction $0 $0$0
$350,000Expense Total $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0$0
$177,765 $126,975 $0 $0Fund 423 - Sewer Utility $0 $0$0
$81,095 $57,925 $0 $0Mountlake Terrace $0 $0$0
$57,925 $41,375 $0 $0Olympic View Water/Sewer
District
$0 $0$0
$33,215 $23,725 $0 $0City of Shoreline $0 $0$0
$350,000Funding Source Total $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0$0
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 143
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 415/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 415/524
To replace problematic, yet critical valves with more reliable technology that helps to
ensure disinfection system functionality and the ability to continue to meet NPDES
discharge permit requirements.
Benefit To replace problematic, yet critical valves with more reliable technology that helps to
ensure disinfection system functionality and the ability to continue to meet NPDES
discharge permit requirements.
Description Replace two gate valves and actuators at the inlets of the two chlorine contact
channels. These gates have repeatedly failed. Repair is often expensive and time
consuming, as access is an issue, so it is necessary to rent scaffolding and other
equipment to make repairs. When a gate fails, it effectively cuts the disinfection
capacity of the plant in half. These are critical pieces of equipment and need to be
replaced with a different technology to improve performance and reliability.
$375,000
CHLORINE CONTACT
CHANNEL SLUICE
GATES REPLACEMENT
PWP-14
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - TREATMENT PLANT
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$0 $75,000 $0 $0Design $0 $0$0
$0 $300,000 $0 $0Construction $0 $0$0
$0Expense Total $375,000 $0 $0 $0 $0$0
$0 $190,463 $0 $0Fund 423 - Sewer Utility $0 $0$0
$0 $86,888 $0 $0Mountlake Terrace $0 $0$0
$0 $62,063 $0 $0Olympic View Water/Sewer
District
$0 $0$0
$0 $35,588 $0 $0City of Shoreline $0 $0$0
$0Funding Source Total $375,000 $0 $0 $0 $0$0
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 144
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 416/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 416/524
This project will fully restore and upgrade the existing non-potable water system and
allow for much-needed redundancy.Benefit This project will fully restore and upgrade the existing non-potable water system and
allow for much-needed redundancy.
Description Relocate one NPW pump and replace one NPW pump. Repair, replace, and modify
piping as needed to achieve full system functionality and redundancy. Current NPW
system does not meet facility needs. Only one pump provides the needed system
pressure to allow the standby generator to function. In the event of that pump failing,
the standby generator (which is required as a backup power source per our NPDES
permit) is not operable.
$75,000
NPW PUMPING
SYSTEM
IMPROVEMENTS
PWP-16
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - TREATMENT PLANT
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$75,000 $0 $0 $0Construction $0 $0$0
$75,000Expense Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$0
$38,093 $0 $0 $0Fund 423 - Sewer Utility $0 $0$0
$17,378 $0 $0 $0Mountlake Terrace $0 $0$0
$12,413 $0 $0 $0Olympic View Water/Sewer
District
$0 $0$0
$7,118 $0 $0 $0City of Shoreline $0 $0$0
$75,000Funding Source Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$0
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 145
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 417/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 417/524
As these are our medium sized blowers, this allows for more efficient and cost-saving
operation of the LPA system.Benefit As these are our medium sized blowers, this allows for more efficient and cost-saving
operation of the LPA system.
Description Blowers are currently running at 75% capacity, are at the end of their useful life
(30,000 hrs, put in service in 2017), and due for rebuild. Extending the budget because
Blower 305 must be replaced in 2027.
$105,000
LPA BLOWER 303 AND
305 REHAB
PWP-18
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - TREATMENT PLANT
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$50,000 $50,000 $0 $0Construction $0 $0$0
$50,000Expense Total $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $0$0
$25,395 $25,395 $0 $0Fund 423 - Sewer Utility $0 $0$0
$11,585 $11,585 $0 $0Mountlake Terrace $0 $0$0
$8,275 $8,275 $0 $0Olympic View Water/Sewer
District
$0 $0$0
$4,745 $4,745 $0 $0City of Shoreline $0 $0$0
$50,000Funding Source Total $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $0$0
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 146
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 418/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 418/524
Rehab of the 600 bldg electrical system will result in a tremendous increase in the
reliability of the critical systems within the 600 bldg including sludge dewatering,
primary sludge pumping, high-pressure air, chemical disinfection pumps and several
others.
Benefit Rehab of the 600 bldg electrical system will result in a tremendous increase in the
reliability of the critical systems within the 600 bldg including sludge dewatering,
primary sludge pumping, high-pressure air, chemical disinfection pumps and several
others.
Description Both the high and low voltage electrical systems are in a degraded state and have
functionality issues during periods of high demand, often resulting in equipment failure
due to MCC or breaker failures. This is a critical system and is at the end of its useful
life, being well over thirty years old. Work extended into 2027.
$250,000
600 BLDG ELECTRICAL
REHAB
PWP-19
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - TREATMENT PLANT
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$250,000 $0 $0 $0Construction $0 $0$0
$250,000Expense Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$0
$126,975 $0 $0 $0Fund 423 - Sewer Utility $0 $0$0
$57,925 $0 $0 $0Mountlake Terrace $0 $0$0
$41,375 $0 $0 $0Olympic View Water/Sewer
District
$0 $0$0
$23,725 $0 $0 $0City of Shoreline $0 $0$0
$250,000Funding Source Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$0
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 147
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 419/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 419/524
Improve performance and reliability as well as lowering operational and maintenance
costs for the systems mentioned above.Benefit Improve performance and reliability as well as lowering operational and maintenance
costs for the systems mentioned above.
Description Perform AQ system repairs and modifications from the prior years' AQ Evaluation
Project to resolve the AQ issues within the 600 bldg with a focus on the lower level
where H2S gas appears to be accumulating at levels that are high enough to do
damage to sensitive electronic equipment such as VFD's, control boards and relay
switches. These electronic failures cause shutdowns in the primary sludge pumping
system, high pressure plant air system and sludge dewatering system. Work extended
into 2027.
$250,000
600 BLDG AIR
QUALITY
REHAB/UPGRADE
PWP-20
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - TREATMENT PLANT
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$125,000 $0 $0 $0Construction $0 $0$0
$125,000Expense Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$0
$63,488 $0 $0 $0Fund 423 - Sewer Utility $0 $0$0
$28,963 $0 $0 $0Mountlake Terrace $0 $0$0
$20,688 $0 $0 $0Olympic View Water/Sewer
District
$0 $0$0
$11,863 $0 $0 $0City of Shoreline $0 $0$0
$125,000Funding Source Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$0
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 148
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 420/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 420/524
This will increase reliability/redundancy in the secondary system and help ensure the
final effluent meets NPDES discharge permit standards.Benefit This will increase reliability/redundancy in the secondary system and help ensure the
final effluent meets NPDES discharge permit standards.
Description Secondary Clarifier 2 has reached the end of useful life as its components are over 30
years old and need to be replaced. Clarifier drive, drive motor and steel structure have
corroded and need repair or replacement. Concrete and interior roof lining need to be
evaluated and repaired if necessary. This work was not completed in 2026. Work
extended into 2027/28.
$450,000
SECONDARY
CLARIFIER 2 REHAB
PWP-21
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - TREATMENT PLANT
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$50,000 $0 $0 $0Design $0 $0$0
$0 $800,000 $0 $0Construction $0 $0$0
$50,000Expense Total $800,000 $0 $0 $0 $0$0
$25,395 $406,320 $0 $0Fund 423 - Sewer Utility $0 $0$0
$11,585 $185,360 $0 $0Mountlake Terrace $0 $0$0
$8,275 $132,400 $0 $0Olympic View Water/Sewer
District
$0 $0$0
$4,745 $75,920 $0 $0City of Shoreline $0 $0$0
$50,000Funding Source Total $800,000 $0 $0 $0 $0$0
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 149
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 421/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 421/524
The SCADA system has been recently upgraded, however, some of the controller
locations have many unused/abandoned panel components (i.e. relays, timers, PLC
systems) and wiring, making documentation and troubleshooting difficult. Existing
system documentation, including panel drawings, I/O wiring drawings, network
drawings, and control logic descriptions, is poor or non-existent. Lack of wire labels
inside PLC cabinets is a safety issue and complicates maintenance and
troubleshooting. This project includes a comprehensive SCADA masterplan that
systematically and timely phases an approach to PLC replacement.
Benefit The SCADA system has been recently upgraded, however, some of the controller
locations have many unused/abandoned panel components (i.e. relays, timers, PLC
systems) and wiring, making documentation and troubleshooting difficult. Existing
system documentation, including panel drawings, I/O wiring drawings, network
drawings, and control logic descriptions, is poor or non-existent. Lack of wire labels
inside PLC cabinets is a safety issue and complicates maintenance and
troubleshooting. This project includes a comprehensive SCADA masterplan that
systematically and timely phases an approach to PLC replacement.
Description The project is to improve the SCADA system for better accuracy and control. The
project involves calibrating process-critical instrumentation, re-commissioning essential
systems, and creating a detailed SCADA Masterplan for phased programmable logic
controller (PLC) replacement. This programmatic approach will replace 7 PLCs, 26
flow meters, and 19 level sensors over the next ten years.
$1,000,000
INSTRUMENTATION
UPGRADES AND
REPLACEMENT
PROGRAM
PWP-22
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - TREATMENT PLANT
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000Construction $0 $0$0
$200,000Expense Total $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $0 $0$0
$101,580 $101,580 $101,580 $101,580Fund 423 - Sewer Utility $0 $0$0
$46,340 $46,340 $46,340 $46,340Mountlake Terrace $0 $0$0
$33,100 $33,100 $33,100 $33,100Olympic View Water/Sewer
District
$0 $0$0
$18,980 $18,980 $18,980 $18,980City of Shoreline $0 $0$0
$200,000Funding Source Total $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $0 $0$0
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 150
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 422/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 422/524
The potable water system should not be used throughout the plant due to corrosive,
particle fouled, and contaminated feed water. This directly impacts the condition
(corrosion), and safe use of the safety showers and eyewash stations in the plant.
There are instances where temporary hoses run potable water to areas of the plant
where needed, but a more permanent solution should be implemented. This study will
investigate the source of the potable water quality issues and evaluate the
implementation of proposed repairs.
Benefit The potable water system should not be used throughout the plant due to corrosive,
particle fouled, and contaminated feed water. This directly impacts the condition
(corrosion), and safe use of the safety showers and eyewash stations in the plant.
There are instances where temporary hoses run potable water to areas of the plant
where needed, but a more permanent solution should be implemented. This study will
investigate the source of the potable water quality issues and evaluate the
implementation of proposed repairs.
Description A study will be completed to evaluate the deficiencies in potable water quality
throughout the plant, especially in areas that affect the operation of safety showers
and eyewash stations. The gasification system may need additional potable water, and
this study will be performed in conjunction with long-term planning for the operation of
the gasifier. The implementation of the potable water system improvements will also
include the installation of all permanent safety shower and eyewash stations. No work
was performed in 2026 - projected expenses carried over into 2028.
$125,000
POTABLE WATER
SYSTEM REPAIR
PWP-23
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - TREATMENT PLANT
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$25,000 $0 $0 $0Design $0 $0$0
$0 $100,000 $0 $0Construction $0 $0$0
$25,000Expense Total $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0$0
$12,698 $50,790 $0 $0Fund 423 - Sewer Utility $0 $0$0
$5,793 $23,170 $0 $0Mountlake Terrace $0 $0$0
$4,138 $16,550 $0 $0Olympic View Water/Sewer
District
$0 $0$0
$2,373 $9,490 $0 $0City of Shoreline $0 $0$0
$25,000Funding Source Total $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0$0
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 151
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 423/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 423/524
Copper corrosion is present on various components and systems throughout the
entire plant, evaluated during a condition assessment in September 2025. This
condition is indicative of the presence of gases that are corrosive to copper elements,
including MCC wiring and instrumentation, that can lead to gross electrical failures.
Neighbors have issued complaints of environmental odors around and from within the
plant boundaries, indicative of elevated hydrogen sulfide (H2S) levels. The project will
include a study on balancing the exhaust and air supply systems, encapsulating and
isolating H2S venting, and identifying critical areas for HVAC system refurbishment.
The project will include the installation of monitoring equipment to optimize gas
removal and treatment.
Benefit Copper corrosion is present on various components and systems throughout the
entire plant, evaluated during a condition assessment in September 2025. This
condition is indicative of the presence of gases that are corrosive to copper elements,
including MCC wiring and instrumentation, that can lead to gross electrical failures.
Neighbors have issued complaints of environmental odors around and from within the
plant boundaries, indicative of elevated hydrogen sulfide (H2S) levels. The project will
include a study on balancing the exhaust and air supply systems, encapsulating and
isolating H2S venting, and identifying critical areas for HVAC system refurbishment.
The project will include the installation of monitoring equipment to optimize gas
removal and treatment.
Description This project will follow the 600 Bldg Air Quality Evaluation Project (PWP-20) in 2025
and expands the study area to the remaining plant buildings in 2026. The project will
install air handling flow meters to perform a flow and mass H2S balance at screening
headworks, solids removal, and primary clarifiers. The existing BioAir system will be
evaluated for proper operation and optimization to improve performance. Annual or
seasonal treatment may include chemical addition for H2S upstream of plant
interceptors. The dumpster staging area will be encapsulated with shed walls and a
high-capacity exhaust system to reduce neighborhood complaints. Recommendations
from the study are planned to be implemented in 2027. Budget carried over into 2028.
$75,000
PLANT HVAC AND
ODOR CONTROL
UPGRADES
PWP-24
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - TREATMENT PLANT
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$37,500 $37,500 $0 $0Construction $0 $0$0
$37,500Expense Total $37,500 $0 $0 $0 $0$0
$19,046 $19,046 $0 $0Fund 423 - Sewer Utility $0 $0$0
$8,689 $8,689 $0 $0Mountlake Terrace $0 $0$0
$6,206 $6,206 $0 $0Olympic View Water/Sewer
District
$0 $0$0
$3,559 $3,559 $0 $0City of Shoreline $0 $0$0
$37,500Funding Source Total $37,500 $0 $0 $0 $0$0
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 152
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 424/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 424/524
A comprehensive valve program will include replacing 3-10 valves per year on a
rotating basis, depending on size and cost, beginning with valves installed 15 years
ago or more, with the intention to continually replace valves before the end of their
expected 20-year lifespan. Notably, in year 1, the condition assessment in September
2025 documented isolation gate valves at the north and south wet wells inlet are
difficult to operate and risk failing in their current position and must be replaced.
Benefit A comprehensive valve program will include replacing 3-10 valves per year on a
rotating basis, depending on size and cost, beginning with valves installed 15 years
ago or more, with the intention to continually replace valves before the end of their
expected 20-year lifespan. Notably, in year 1, the condition assessment in September
2025 documented isolation gate valves at the north and south wet wells inlet are
difficult to operate and risk failing in their current position and must be replaced.
Description This project implements a comprehensive valve replacement program to systematically
replace valves throughout the plant, beginning with valves nearing the end of their
useful life. For older valves, surrounding piping that is determined to be in poor
condition will be replaced with the valve. The program is proposed for the next 15
years.
$3,750,0000
VALVE REPLACEMENT
PROGRAM
PWP-25
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - TREATMENT PLANT
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000Construction $250,000 $3,500,000$250,000
$250,000Expense Total $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $3,500,000$250,000
$126,975 $126,975 $126,975 $126,975Fund 423 - Sewer Utility $126,975 $1,777,650$126,975
$57,925 $57,925 $57,925 $57,925Mountlake Terrace $57,925 $810,950$57,925
$41,375 $41,375 $41,375 $41,375Olympic View Water/Sewer
District
$41,375 $579,250$41,375
$23,725 $23,725 $23,725 $23,725City of Shoreline $23,725 $332,150$23,725
$250,000Funding Source Total $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $3,500,000$250,000
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 153
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 425/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 425/524
The MCCs in Building 100 and Building 600 have electrical components more than 30
years old and have started to fail. Many low voltage breakers are in poor condition and
failure would render critical equipment non-functional. The MCCs were determined to
have inadequate ventilation, contributing to high moisture levels, increased corrosion
of equipment, and frequent downtime. Several MCCs have unbalanced currents when
measured at the Main Feeder Lugs during a condition assessment in September
2024. The backup electrical system does not have any procedures in place and staff
have not been trained in operating the emergency generator; this project will include
developing a standard operating procedure and training current staff. In addition,
several buckets have openings in the door with temporary cardboard used as a ‘patch’
material following the previous removal and changing of components. FME devices
are needed on all doors to meet NFPA 70E standards for electrical safety. This project
would be additional work related to the rehab and upgrade of the ventilation and
electrical systems in Building 600 and Building 100.
Benefit The MCCs in Building 100 and Building 600 have electrical components more than 30
years old and have started to fail. Many low voltage breakers are in poor condition and
failure would render critical equipment non-functional. The MCCs were determined to
have inadequate ventilation, contributing to high moisture levels, increased corrosion
of equipment, and frequent downtime. Several MCCs have unbalanced currents when
measured at the Main Feeder Lugs during a condition assessment in September
2024. The backup electrical system does not have any procedures in place and staff
have not been trained in operating the emergency generator; this project will include
developing a standard operating procedure and training current staff. In addition,
several buckets have openings in the door with temporary cardboard used as a ‘patch’
material following the previous removal and changing of components. FME devices
are needed on all doors to meet NFPA 70E standards for electrical safety. This project
would be additional work related to the rehab and upgrade of the ventilation and
electrical systems in Building 600 and Building 100.
Description The Electrical Improvement Project aims to enhance the reliability, safety, and
efficiency of the electrical systems plant-wide. This project will rehabilitate or replace
the motor control centers (MCCs), replace failing breakers, add foreign material
exclusion (FME) devices, and conduct essential maintenance and inspections.
$600,0000
ELECTRICAL
IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT
PWP-26
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - TREATMENT PLANT
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$200,000 $200,000 $0 $0Construction $0 $0$0
$200,000Expense Total $200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0$0
$101,580 $101,580 $0 $0Fund 423 - Sewer Utility $0 $0$0
$46,340 $46,340 $0 $0Mountlake Terrace $0 $0$0
$33,100 $33,100 $0 $0Olympic View Water/Sewer
District
$0 $0$0
$18,980 $18,980 $0 $0City of Shoreline $0 $0$0
$200,000Funding Source Total $200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0$0
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 154
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 426/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 426/524
Maintain NPDES Permit compliance and protect human and environmental health,
and minimize chemical or biological risk to Puget Sound receiving waters. Improve
operational reliability and resilience.
Benefit Maintain NPDES Permit compliance and protect human and environmental health,
and minimize chemical or biological risk to Puget Sound receiving waters. Improve
operational reliability and resilience.
Description The current infrastructure for the dosing of sodium hypochlorite for disinfection,
followed by sodium bisulfite for dechlorination prior to release of waters into Puget
Sound has degraded and become unreliable, showing significant signs of aging, and
requires immediate redesign and replacement.
$500K to $1M
DISINFECTION
SYSTEM REHAB
PWP-27
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - TREATMENT PLANT
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$50,000 $0 $0 $0Design $0 $0$0
$450,000 $500,000 $0 $0Construction $0 $0$0
$500,000Expense Total $500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0$0
$253,950 $253,950 $0 $0Fund 423 - Sewer Utility $0 $0$0
$115,850 $115,850 $0 $0Mountlake Terrace $0 $0$0
$82,750 $82,750 $0 $0Olympic View Water/Sewer
District
$0 $0$0
$47,450 $47,450 $0 $0City of Shoreline $0 $0$0
$500,000Funding Source Total $500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0$0
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 155
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 427/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 427/524
Assure complete electrical system safety, integrity, and reliability. Restore dependable
power distribution and reduce the likelihood of unexpected failures, outages, or
equipment damage from inconsistent power supply.
Benefit Assure complete electrical system safety, integrity, and reliability. Restore dependable
power distribution and reduce the likelihood of unexpected failures, outages, or
equipment damage from inconsistent power supply.
Description The 400 Building electrical system sustained significant damage during the 2022
flooding event. Emergency repairs were completed at that time to restore critical
functions immediately following the incident; however, approximately 75% of electrical
outlets and panels remain inoperative and require replacement. This condition
presents reliability, safety, and operational concerns that affect day-to-day plant
operations and maintenance activities.
$250K
400 BUILDING
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
REPAIR AND REPLACE
PWP-28
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - TREATMENT PLANT
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$250,000 $0 $0 $0I&C Replacement $0 $0$0
$250,000Expense Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$0
$126,975 $0 $0 $0Fund 423 - Sewer Utility $0 $0$0
$57,925 $0 $0 $0Mountlake Terrace $0 $0$0
$41,375 $0 $0 $0Olympic View Water/Sewer
District
$0 $0$0
$23,725 $0 $0 $0City of Shoreline $0 $0$0
$250,000Funding Source Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$0
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 156
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 428/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 428/524
Replacement of the floor will extend the life of the tank, assure tank integrity, allow full
rotation of the collection arm, prevent excessive stress on the drive unit and rake
arms, and improve solids collection efficiency.
Benefit Replacement of the floor will extend the life of the tank, assure tank integrity, allow full
rotation of the collection arm, prevent excessive stress on the drive unit and rake
arms, and improve solids collection efficiency.
Description A large section of the tank floor in Secondary Clarifier #1 is buckling upward and
created a bulge. This bulge indicates instability and a weakness in the flooring that
could lead to rupture and that currently interferes with the rotational path of the clarifier
rake arm that moves solids inside the tank to the collection sump. Continued operation
under these conditions could result in damage to the rake arms, drive unit, and
mechanical components.
$1.75M
SECONDARY
CLARIFIER #1 FLOOR
REPLACEMENT
PWP-29
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - TREATMENT PLANT
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$250,000 $0 $0 $0Design $0 $0$0
$0 $750,000 $750,000 $0Construction $0 $0$0
$250,000Expense Total $750,000 $750,000 $0 $0 $0$0
$126,975 $380,925 $380,925 $0Fund 423 - Sewer Utility $0 $0$0
$57,925 $173,775 $173,775 $0Mountlake Terrace $0 $0$0
$41,375 $124,125 $124,125 $0Olympic View Water/Sewer
District
$0 $0$0
$23,725 $71,175 $71,175 $0City of Shoreline $0 $0$0
$250,000Funding Source Total $750,000 $750,000 $0 $0 $0$0
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 157
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 429/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 429/524
This project will modernize the wastewater treatment plant's aging SCADA, PLC,
operational technology network, and control systems to improve reliability,
cybersecurity, and long-term maintainability.
Benefit This project will modernize the wastewater treatment plant's aging SCADA, PLC,
operational technology network, and control systems to improve reliability,
cybersecurity, and long-term maintainability.
Description The wastewater treatment plant's SCADA, PLC, and operational infrastructure is
aging, increasingly difficult to maintain, and lacks the reliability, cybersecurity, and
documentation needed to support ongoing and long-term operations.
$1,000,000
SCADA AND CONTROL
SYSTEMS
MODERNIZATION
PWP-30
*Projects starting before 2027 include prior year expenditures.
PUBLIC WORKS - TREATMENT PLANT
Budget
September 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Estimated Project Cost*
Project Cost 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2033-472032
$300,000 $0 $0 $0Design $0 $0$0
$700,000 $0 $0 $0Construction $0 $0$0
$1,000,000Expense Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$0
$507,900 $0 $0 $0Fund 423 - Sewer Utility $0 $0$0
$231,700 $0 $0 $0Mountlake Terrace $0 $0$0
$165,500 $0 $0 $0Olympic View Water/Sewer
District
$0 $0$0
$94,900 $0 $0 $0City of Shoreline $0 $0$0
$1,000,000Funding Source Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$0
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 158
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 430/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 430/524
CFP/CIP COMPARISION 2026-2027
2027-2032 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 159
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 431/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 431/524
CFP / CIP COMPARISON (2026 TO 2027)SEPTEMBER 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Type CIP/CFP#Project Name Description
Transportation PWT-105 7th Ave. N Walkway from Daley St. to SR-524 / 196th St. SW Added to CIP
Transportation PWT-56 Pedestrian Improvements (2027)Added to CIP
Transportation PWT-107 Pedestrian Improvements (2028)Added to CIP
Transportation PWT-106 Feasibility Study (Main St. @ 9th Ave. / Walnut St. @ 9th Ave.)Added to CIP
Storm PWD-28 Edmonds Marsh Preliminary Design Estimated future costs for stormwater project.
Sewer PWS-13 Phase 19 Annual Sewer Replacement/Rehab (2032)Estimated future costs for sewerline replacements
WWTP PWP-27 Disinfection System Rehab New project added due to emergent needs at WWTP
WWTP PWP-28 400 Building Electrical System Repair and Replace New project added due to emergent needs at WWTP
WWTP PWP-29 Secondary Clarifier #1 Floor Replacement New project added due to emergent needs at WWTP
WWTP PWP-30 SCADA and Control Systems Modernization New project added due to emergent needs at WWTP
WWTP PWP-06 Joint Sealant Reenabled. Added to 2027 budget
WWTP PWP-11 Primary Clarifier 2 Rehab Reenabled and updated. Added to 2027-2028 budget
Type Project No.Project Name Description
Transportation PWT-04 Main St. Overlay from 6th Ave. to 8th Ave. Cost and funding revised, extended to 2027
Transportation PWT-05 Puget Dr. @ OVD Signal Upgrades Cost and funding revised, moved from 2028-2029 to 2030-2031
Transportation PWT-06 Signal Upgrades - 100th Ave @ 238th St. SW Cost and funding revised, moved from 2028-2029 to 2030-2031
Transportation PWT-28 175th St SW Slope Repair Cost and funding revised, moved from 2028-2029 to 2030-2031
Transportation PWT-07 Main St. @ 3rd Signal Upgrades Cost and funding revised, moved from 2028-2029 to 2030-2031
Transportation PWT-103 7th Ave. N Pedestrian Improvements Cost and funding revised, extended to 2027
Transportation PWT-104 76th Ave. W Overlay from 220th St. SW to Hwy 99 Cost and funding revised
Transportation PWT-61 Olympic View Dr. Overlay from 196th to Talbot Rd. Cost and Funding revised, extended to 2027-2028
Transportation PWT-69 7th Ave. Sidewalk Repair Cost and funding revised, moved from 2028-2029 to 2030-2031
Transportation PWT-08 228th St. SW from Hwy 99 to 95th Pl. W Corridor Cost and funding revised, moved from 2029-2046 to 2030-2047
Transportation PWT-10 Hwy 99 Revitalization & Gateway Project - Stage 3 Cost and funding revised, extended to 2030
Transportation PWT-11 Hwy 99 Revitalization & Gateway Project - Stage 4 Cost and funding revised, extended to 2031
Transportation PWT-12 Hwy 99 Revitalization & Gateway Project - Stage 5 Cost and funding revised, moved to 2032-2047
Transportation PWT-13 Hwy 99 Revitalization & Gateway Project - Stage 6 Cost and funding revised, moved from 2032-2046 to 2031-2047
Transportation PWT-14 Hwy 99 Revitalization & Gateway Project - Stage 7 Cost and funding revised, moved from 2032-2046 to 2033-2047
Transportation PWT-15 Hwy 99 Revitalization & Gateway Project - Stage 8 Cost and funding revised, moved from 2032-2046 to 2033-2047
Transportation PWT-16 Hwy 99 Revitalization & Gateway Project - Stage 9 Cost and funding revised, moved from 2031-2047
Transportation PWT-17 SR 524 (196th St. SW) / 88th Ave. W - Intersection Improvements Cost and funding revised, moved from 2032-2046 to 2033-2047
Transportation PWT-18 Main St. @ 9th Ave. Intersection Improvements Cost and funding revised, moved from 2029-2030 to 2030-2031
Transportation PWT-19 76th Ave W @ 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements Cost and funding revised, moved from 2026-2029 to 2027-2031
Transportation PWT-20 SR-104 Adaptive System - 236th to 226th Cost and funding revised, moved from 2026-2029 to 2027-2030
PR
O
J
E
C
T
S
A
D
D
E
D
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
S
R
E
V
I
S
E
D
PR
O
J
E
C
T
S
R
E
V
I
S
E
D
PR
O
J
E
C
T
S
R
E
V
I
S
E
D
PR
O
J
E
C
T
S
R
E
V
I
S
E
D
160
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 432/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 432/524
CFP / CIP COMPARISON (2026 TO 2027)SEPTEMBER 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Type Project No.Project Name Description
PR
O
J
E
C
T
S
R
E
V
I
S
E
D
PR
O
J
E
C
T
S
R
E
V
I
S
E
D
PR
O
J
E
C
T
S
R
E
V
I
S
E
D
PR
O
J
E
C
T
S
R
E
V
I
S
E
D
Transportation PWT-21 SR-104 @ 100th Ave W. Intersection Improvements Cost and funding revised, moved to 2030-2032
Transportation PWT-22 SR-104 @ 95th Pl. W Intersection Improvements Cost and funding revised, moved from 2032-2046 to 2033-2047
Transportation PWT-23 SR-104 @ 238th St. SW Intersection Improvements Cost and funding revised, moved from 2032-2046 to 2033-2047
Transportation PWT-43 SR-104 @ 76th Ave. W Intersection Improvements Cost and funding revised, moved to 2030-2031
Transportation PWT-24 Olympic View Dr @ 76th Ave. W Intersection Improvements Cost and funding revised, moved from 2032-2046 to 2033-2047
Transportation PWT-25 84th Ave W (212th St. SW to 238th St. SW)Cost and funding revised, moved from 2032-2046 to 2033-2047
Transportation PWT-43 SR-104 @ 76th Ave. W Intersection Improvements Cost and funding revised, moved from 2032-2046 to 2030-2031
Transportation PWT-97 76th Ave. W Adaptive System from 206th St SW to 220th St SW Cost and funding revised, moved to 2030-2031
Transportation PWT-98 Citywide Lighting Improvements Cost and funding revised
Transportation PWT-29 232nd St. SW Walkway from 100th Ave. to SR-104 Cost and funding revised
Transportation PWT-31 236th St. SW Walkway from Hwy 99 to 76th Ave. W Cost and funding revised
Transportation PWT-32 84th Ave. W Walkway from 238th St. SW to 234th St. SW Cost and funding revised, moved from 2029-2030 to 2030-2031
Transportation PWT-33 80th Ave. Walkway from 212th St. SW to 206th St. SW Cost and funding revised, moved from 2032-2046 to 2031-2032
Transportation PWT-34 80th Ave. W Walkway from 188th St. SW to Olympic View Dr.Cost and funding revised, moved from 2032-2046 to 2033-2047
Transportation PWT-35 218th St. SW Walkway from 84th Ave. W to 76th Ave. W Cost and funding revised, moved from 2032-2046 to 2033-2047
Transportation PWT-36 Walnut St. Walkway from 6th Ave. S to 7th Ave. S Cost and funding revised, moved from 2032-2046 to 2033-2047
Transportation PWT-40 Maplewood Dr. Walkway from Main St. to 200th St. SW Cost and funding revised, moved from 2029-2031 to 2030-2032
Transportation PWT-45 SR-104 / Pine St. Walkway from HAWK signal to Pine / SR-104 to 9th Cost and funding revised, moved from 2032-2046 to 2033-2047
Transportation PWT-47 104th Ave W / Robinhood Ln Walkway from from 238th St. SW to 106th Ave WCost and funding revised, moved from 2032-2046 to 2033-2047
Transportation PWT-71 Caspers/9th Ave N/Puget Multi-Use path from Admiral Way to OVD Cost and funding revised, moved from 2029-2031 to 2030-2032
Transportation PWT-72 SR-104 Multi-Use path from Sunset Ave. to 100th Ave. W Cost and funding revised, moved from 2029-2031 to 2030-2032
Transportation PWT-73 212th St. SW Multi-Use path from 74th Ave. W to Hwy 99 Cost and funding revised, moved from 2029-2046 to 2031-2047
Transportation PWT-74 SR-104 Multi-Use path from 100th Ave. W to 244th St. SW Cost and funding revised, moved from 2029-2046 to 2030-2047
Transportation PWT-75 Main St. Bike lanes from Ferry Terminal to 6th Ave. Cost and funding revised, moved from 2029-2046 to 2033-2047
Transportation PWT-76 240th St. SW / 78th Ave. W SW from Hwy 99 to 236th St. SW Cost and funding revised, moved from 2029-2031 to 2030-2032
Transportation PWT-77 9th Ave. N Bike lanes from Main St. to Caspers St. Cost and funding revised, moved from 2029-2030 to 2031-2032
Transportation PWT-78 Main St. Bike Lanes from 9th Ave. to 84th Ave .W Cost and funding revised, moved from 2029-2030 to 2030-2031
Transportation PWT-79 238th St. SW Bike lanes from SR-104 to 84th Ave. W Cost and funding revised, moved to 2030-2031
Transportation PWT-80 236th St SW Walkway from 94th Ave W to 84th Ave W Cost and funding revised
Transportation PWT-81 Sunset Ave. Multi-Use path from Caspers St. to 3rd Ave. N Cost and funding revised, moved from 2032-2046 to 2033-2047
Transportation PWT-83 Olympic View Dr. Muli-Use path from 76th Ave. W to City Limits Cost and funding revised, moved from 2032-2046 to 2033-2047
Transportation PWT-84 196th St. SW Multi-Use path from 88th Ave. W to 76th Ave. W Cost and funding revised, moved from 2032-2046 to 2033-2047
Transportation PWT-87 Maple St. Walkway from 8th Ave. S to 9th Ave. S Cost and funding revised, moved from 2032-2046 to 2033-2047
Transportation PWT-88 218th St SW Walkway from 84th Ave. to 76th Ave Cost and funding revised, moved from 2032-2046 to 2033-2047
Transportation PWT-89 88th Ave Walkway from 200th St. SW to 196th St. SW Cost and funding revised, moved from 2032-2046 to 2033-2047
PROJECTS REVISED
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
S
R
E
V
I
S
E
D
PR
O
J
E
C
T
S
R
E
V
I
S
E
D
PR
O
J
E
C
T
S
R
E
V
I
S
E
D
161
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 433/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 433/524
CFP / CIP COMPARISON (2026 TO 2027)SEPTEMBER 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Type Project No.Project Name Description
PR
O
J
E
C
T
S
R
E
V
I
S
E
D
PR
O
J
E
C
T
S
R
E
V
I
S
E
D
PR
O
J
E
C
T
S
R
E
V
I
S
E
D
PR
O
J
E
C
T
S
R
E
V
I
S
E
D
Transportation PWT-91 Olympic Ave. Walkway from Olympic View Dr. to Puget Dr Cost and funding revised, moved from 2032-2046 to 2033-2047
Transportation PWT-92 Meadowdale Beach Rd .Walkway from 75th Pl. W to Olympic View Dr. Cost and funding revised, moved from 2032-2046 to 2033-2047
Transportation PWT-93 6th Ave. S from Elm Way to Pine St Cost and funding revised, moved from 2032-2046 to 2033-2047
Transportation PWT-96 234th St. SW Walkway from Hwy 99 to 76th Ave. W Cost and funding revised, moved from 2032-2046 to 2033-2047
Transportation PWT-102 224th St. SW Bike Lanes from 76th Ave. W to Interurban Trail Cost and funding revised, moved to 2030
Transportation PWT-51 Ferry Storage Improvements from Pine St. to Dayton St.Cost and funding revised, moved from 2029-2030 to 2030-2031
Transportation PWT-53 ADA Transition Plan Moved from 2029 to 2030
Transportation PWT-54 Transportation Plan Update Cost and funding revised
Transportation PWT-100 Olympic View Dr Feasibility Study Cost and funding revised, moved from 2032-2046 to 2030
Transportation PWT-101 196th St. SW Feasibility Study Cost and funding revised, moved from 2032-2046 to 2033-2047
Transportation PWT-99 SR-104 Overpass Feasibility Study Cost and funding revised, moved from 2029 to 2030
Transportation PWT-68 88th Ave Overlay and Sidewalk Repair Final completion extended to 2027
Water PWW-03-09,20Phase 16-36 Water Replacement Projects (2027-47)Construction funding revised for 2027, Phases moved one year out
Water PWW-11 Yost & Seaview Reservoir Repairs & Upgrades Construction cost and funding extended to 2026-2028
Storm PWD-13-16,18Phase 6-26 Storm Maintenance Project Construction funding revised for 2027, Phases moved one year out
Storm PWD-07 Phase 12 Storm Maintenance (2032)Estimated future costs for stormline replacements.
Storm PWD-04 Lower Perrinville Creek Restoration Project Cost and Funding Updated
Storm PWD-01 Edmonds Marsh Water Quality Improvements (Phase 1)Construction costs moved to 2027
Storm PWD-05 Edmonds Marsh Water Quality Improvements (Phase 2)Construction costs moved to 2027
Storm PWD-17 Storm and Surface Water Comprehensive Plan Final completion moved to 2027
Sewer PWS-05 Phase 13 Annual Sewer Replacement/Rehab Final completion moved to 2027
Sewer PWS-03-08,12,13Phase 14-32 Sewer Replacement Construction funding revised for 2027
Sewer PWS-10 Phase 5-9 Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehabilitation and Future Projects Construction funding revised for 2027
WWTP PWP-04 Nutrient Removal Project
Project cost and timeline shifted from 2026-2028 budget to 2027-
2029.
WWTP PWP-13 ODS (Primary Sludge) Pump Replacement
Project costs and timeline shifted from 2026-2028 budget to 2027-
2028.
WWTP PWP-16 NPW Pumping System Improvements Project costs and timeline shifted from 2026 budget to 2027.
WWTP PWP-18 LPA Blower 303 and 305 Rehab Project costs and timeline revised and extended to 2028
WWTP PWP-19 600 Bldg Electrical Rehab Project costs and timeline shifted from 2026 budget to 2027.
WWTP PWP-20 600 Bldg Air Quality Evaluation Construction work on ventilation system extended into 2027.
WWTP PWP-21 Secondary Clarifier 2 Rehab Project costs and timeline shifted from 2026 budget to 2027-2028
PROJECTS REVISEDPROJECTS REVISED
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
S
R
E
V
I
S
E
D
PR
O
J
E
C
T
S
R
E
V
I
S
E
D
162
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 434/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 434/524
CFP / CIP COMPARISON (2026 TO 2027)SEPTEMBER 2026 DRAFT 1.4
Type Project No.Project Name Description
PR
O
J
E
C
T
S
R
E
V
I
S
E
D
PR
O
J
E
C
T
S
R
E
V
I
S
E
D
PR
O
J
E
C
T
S
R
E
V
I
S
E
D
PR
O
J
E
C
T
S
R
E
V
I
S
E
D
WWTP PWP-23 Potable Water System Repair
Project costs and timeline shifted from 2026-2027 budget to 2027-
2028.
WWTP PWP-24 Plant HVAC and Odor Control Upgrades
Project costs and timeline shifted from 2026-2027 budget to 2027-
2028.
WWTP PWP-25 Valve Replacement Program
Project costs and timeline corrected to indicate ongoing annual
expense
Facilities PWF-02 Cemetery Building Six-year cost and funding (2027-2032) revised
Facilities PWF-03 City Hall Six-year cost and funding (2027-2032) revised
Facilities PWF-04 Fishing Pier/Beach Ranger Station Six-year cost and funding (2027-2032) revised
Facilities PWF-05 Frances Anderson Center Six-year cost and funding (2027-2032) revised
Facilities PWF-09 Historic Log Cabin Six-year cost and funding (2027-2032) revised
Facilities PWF-10 Historical Museum Six-year cost and funding (2027-2032) revised
Facilities PWF-11 Library Six-year cost and funding (2027-2032) revised
Facilities PWF-13 Old Public Works Six-year cost and funding (2027-2032) revised
Facilities PWF-14 Parks Maintenance Building Six-year cost and funding (2027-2032) revised
Facilities PWF-15 Public Safety Six-year cost and funding (2027-2032) revised
Facilities PWF-16 Public Works Apron Repair
Six-year cost and funding (2027-2032) revised (Renamed from PW
O&M)
Facilities PWF-17 Wade James Theater Six-year cost and funding (2027-2032) revised
Facilities PWF-18 Yost Pool House Six-year cost and funding (2027-2032) revised
Facilities PWF-23 Library Plaza Deck Waterproofing Six-year cost and funding (2027-2032) revised
Type Project No. Project Name Description
Tranportation PWT-66 4th Avenue Cultural Corridor Removed
Tranportation PWT-70 Safety Action Plan Completed
Storm PWD-12 Phase 5 Storm Maintenance Project Final completion extended to 2027
Storm PWD-22 7317 Ballinger Way Floodplain Purchase & Structure Removal Completed
Storm PWD-26 20719 86th Pl W Structure Removal and Rain Gardens Completed
Facilities PWF-01 Boys and Girls Club Building demolished
Facilities PWF-12 Meadowdale Club House Disabled - No projects planned in six-year projections
WWTP PWP-17 600 Bldg Air Quality Evaluation Completed
WWTP PWP-02 Carbon Recovery Project Removed
WWTP PWP-05 Primary Clarifier Disabled - Further evaluation is required
WWTP PWP-07 Vacuum Filter Disabled - Further evaluation is required
PROJECTS REVISEDPROJECTS REVISEDPROJECTS REVISED
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
S
R
E
V
I
S
E
D
PR
O
J
E
C
T
S
R
E
M
O
V
E
D
163
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 435/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 435/524
2027-2032 DRAFT
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN &
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
DRAFT July 2026
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 436/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 436/524
Page 2
September 9, 2026
Members of the City Council, Planning Board, City Staff, and Edmonds Community,
On behalf of the Parks & Recreation Department, I am pleased to present the City of Edmonds Draft 2027–2032
Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and Capital Facilities Plan (CFP). This document outlines our six-year strategy
for stewarding the City’s parks, open spaces, and recreational facilities during a time in which thoughtful asset
management is more important than ever.
Edmonds is a mature and largely built-out community with park infrastructure that, in many cases, has served
residents for decades. Much of this infrastructure such as playgrounds, boardwalks, trails, and specialized facilities
such as Yost Pool are aging with some nearing, and in some situations, beyond their intended lifespan. At the
same time, the city continues to navigate budgetary challenges and limited departmental staffing, both of which
influence how we prioritize capital investment. For these reasons, this CFP/CIP centers on safety, asset
sustainability, deferred maintenance and accessibility our community relies upon every day.
Within these pages, you will find:
• Priority repairs and replacements that address safety, deferred maintenance, and ADA accessibility.
• Key natural-area restoration projects, including Shell Creek and the Edmonds Marsh.
• Strategic investments in underserved neighborhoods through early acquisition and planning for new
parks in the HWY 99 and Southeast Edmonds areas.
• Targeted upgrades to essential facilities such as Yost Pool, playgrounds, trails, and park amenities.
• Transparent cost estimates, funding sources, and multi-year schedules for projects.
Our goal is straightforward: protect and sustain existing assets while making measured progress on long-term
community priorities. Even in a challenging fiscal climate, these investments support public and user safety,
equity, environmental health, and increased operational effectiveness across Edmonds’ park system.
We are grateful for the ongoing support of the City Council, Planning Board, community partners, and Edmonds
residents, businesses and visitors. Your engagement in the capital planning process ensures that the priorities
reflect the needs, values, and aspirations of our community.
Thank you for your thoughtful review of the 2027–2032 Draft CFP/CIP.
Sincerely,
Angie Feser, Edmonds Parks & Recreation Director
425-771-0256
Angie.Feser@Edmondswa.gov
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 437/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 437/524
P8
D20
D21R20 R19
P1D2
P4D1D9A1
R11R15
P5
¯
August 2026
Parks & Recreation2027 - 2032 PARKS PROJECTS
Projects
2027-28
2028-32
R19, P8
P5
R11
P4, D9, D1, A1P1, D2
R15
D20
D21, R20
R16R17
A3, P6, D15A4, P7, D18
Shell Creek Restoration
Yost Pool Upgrades Woodway Campus Athletic Compex Johnson Property Marsh Boardwalk Replacement Edmonds Marsh RestorationParks Maintenance BuildingPool Replacement
ADA Improvements & Replacement Citywide Park ImprovementsPlayground Replacement #1
Playground Replacement #2 Neighborhood Park HWY 99 Neighborhood Park SE 2
Page 3
P10, R12
P9, R8
Project Type: A: Acquisition – R: Replacement/Upgrade – P: Master Planning – D: Development (new)
Non-site specific projects:
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 438/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 438/524
2027-2032 SIX-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM and CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
CFP Project# Project Site & Description 2027 2028 2029 2030 -Shell Creek Restoration Phase 1 & 2 *CARRYFORWARD*
PS Planning, design (phase 1) and renovation (phase 2). Project to provide improved $ 240,000 $ 200,000 $ 180,000 $ R19 environmental health and erosion control of Shell Creek in Yost Park, may include
trail, bridge and boardwalk repair or relocation.
pg Playground Replacement #1
X Replacement of aging playground and related improvements to improve ADA $ $ 50,000 $ 350,000 $ R8 compliance.
Yost Pool Upgrades & Renovation
Rll Repairs and renovations of 50+ year old pool as needed, to include a furture $ $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $
complete replaster of the pool lining.
Woodway Campus Athletic Complex -Phase I -Lighting
X D20 In cooperation with the Edmonds School District, complete a community park and $ $ $1,500,000 $ athletic complex at Former Woodway High School to include lighting and future
construction of two additional fields.
D21 Marsh Boardwalk Replacement $ $ $ $ R20 Assessment of northwest Edmonds Marsh boardwalk for possible replacement. 25,000
PlO Playground Replacement #2
X Replacement of aging playground and related improvements to improve ADA $ $ $ 50,000 $ 350,000 R12 compliance.
A3 Neighborhood Park -HWY 99
X PG Acquisition, Master plan and development of a new neighborhood park near SR $ $ $ $ 900,000
DlS 99.
Johnson Property
X PS Master plan for future use and expansion of Yost Park. Site development not $ $ $ $
included in estimate.
A4 Neighborhood Park -SE 2
X P7 Master plan and development of a new neighborhood park in Southeast $ $ $ $
D18 Edmonds (funding is in Parkland Acquisition program for purchase).
Project Type: A: Acquisition -R: Replacement/Upgrade -P: Master Planning -D: Development (new)
Page 4
2031
$
$
$
$
$
$
$ 100,000
$ 50,000
$ 700,000
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
2032 6-Year Total
$ 620,000
$ 400,000
$ 200,000
$ 1,500,000
$ 25,000
$ 400,000
I 111 $ 1,850,QQQ
$ 50,000
II 111 $ 800,QQQ
2027-2032 SIX-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM and CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
CFP Project# Project Site & Description 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 6-Year Total-X
X
X
Pool Replacement
RlS Replacement of the existing Yost pool due to end of life cycle. Consideration of
possible partnerships with design, location, and funding TBD.
Pl Parks & Facilities Maintenance and Operations Building
Replace and/or renovate Parks & Facilities Maintenance Shop located in City Park. D2 Phase 1 -feasibility study.
Edmonds Marsh Estuary Restoration (Willow Creek Daylighting)
Al Aquisition, Master Plan development and implementation of the Edmonds Marsh
P4 to daylight the waterway connection of Puget Sound to the Edmonds Marsh and
Dl two fresh water creeks providing restoration of fresh water/salt water estuary and
natural tidal exchange. (All expenses are TBD per Council direction in December
2022).
(A)SUBTOTAL PARKS CIP/CFP PROJECTS
Project# PARKS CIP PROGRAMS
ADA Improvements & Replacement
R16 Ongoing replacement or improvements to meet ADA standards within park
system.
R17
Citywide Park Improvements / Capital Replacement Program
Ongoing program of funding allocation for regular, major and deferred
maintenance, repair and replacement of parks amenities, structures and
equipment (staff time allocation included).
Debt Service and lnterfund Transfers
Debt service on two Civic Park bonds and Marina Beach Park acquisition.
(B)SUBTOTAL· PARKS CIP PROGRAMS
$ $ $ $ $ $ 30,000,000 $30,000,000
$ $ $ $ $ $
TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
$ 240,000 $ 350,000 $ 2,20S,000 $ 1,250,000 $ 850,000 $ 30,950,000 $35,845,000
2027 2028 2029 2030 2031
$ 75,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $
$ 640,000 $ 645,000 $ 651,000 $ 657,000 $ 663,000 $
2032 6-Year Total
I I I I I $ 1,075,QQQ
, , ' I I I $ 3,925,QQQ
$ 410,438 $ 416,350 $ 407,912 $ 414,225 $ 414,993 $ ' I, $ 2,399,324
$ 1,050,438 $1,061,350 $1,058,912 $1,071,225 $1,077,993 $ 1,004,406 $ 6,324,324
(C)TOTAL PARKS CIP/CFP EXPENDITURES (A+B)$1,290,438 $1,411,350 $ 3,263,912 $ 2,321,225 $1,927,993 $ 31,954,406 $42,169,324
Project Type: A: Acquisition -R: Replacement/Upgrade -P: Master Planning -D: Development (new)
Page 5
2027-2032 SIX-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM and CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
PARKS CAPITAL REVENUE & EXPENSE SUMMARY FUNDS 125, 126 & 332
cise T X (R
Park Impact Fees -Fund 332-100
Investment Interest (3%) 64,754 $ 32,992 $ 27,141 $
on ti
Bond Proceeds
Secured Grants
Parks Fund 6-Vear Overview 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032
(E)Beginning Fund Balance $ 2,163,469 $ 2,505,877 $ 2,810,404 $ 2,275,158 $1,358,150 $ 835,291
(D)Revenue $1,707,845 $1,765,878 $ 2,778,666 $1,704,217 $ 1,705,134 $ 31,635,404
(C)Expenditures $1,290,438 $1,411,350 $ 3,263,912 $ 2,321,225 $1,927,993 $ 31,954,406
(F)Ending Fund Balance (E+D-C)$ 2,580,877 $2,860,404 $2,325,158 $1,658,150 $1,135,291 $ 516,289
Restricted land Acquisition Funds: $ 1,315,325 $ 1,415,325 $ 1,515,325 $ 715,325 $ 115,325 $ 215,325
Available Funding (park impact fees & interest): $1,265,552 $1,445,079 $ 809,833 $ 942,825 $1,019,966 $ 300,964
Page 6
Page 7
2027-2032
Parks Capital Improvement Program
& Capital Facilities Plan
PROJECTS
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 442/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 442/524
Page 8
Parks & Recreation
Shell Creek Restoration Phase 1 & 2 – P8, R19
Shell Creek Valley, Yost Park
Project Summary: The project aims to rehabilitate and enhance the ecological integrity and public accessibility of the
northern section of the 45-acre Yost Park. This project will focus on:
•Habitat and environmental protection and enhancement
•Mitigation, restoration and appropriate trail, bridge and boardwalk locations to address stream degradation
•Replacement, relocation or elimination of pedestrian bridges, trails, and boardwalks
•Removal or modification of aging concrete structures
Following the completion of the Existing Conditions Analysis, the next phase will include:
•Development of a detailed scope of work
•Engagement of architecture, engineering, and ecological design professionals
•Preparation of permitting documents and preliminary construction cost estimates
•Restoration project completion
Project Justification: Yost Park contains a segment of Shell Creek, a salmon-bearing stream that is currently experiencing
environmental degradation. Key concerns include:
•Erosion and sedimentation affecting streambed conditions and salmon spawning habitat
•Closure of a pedestrian bridge due to erosion, limiting trail connectivity and park access
•Deterioration of additional pedestrian bridges, which are approaching the end of their lifecycle
These issues compromise both ecological health and public use of the park. Restoration efforts will improve habitat
conditions, enhance recreational access, and support long-term sustainability.
Continued on next page…
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 443/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 443/524
Page 9
Shell Creek Restoration Phase 1 & 2 – P8, R19 – continued.
This project supports five goals and eleven objectives outlined in the City of Edmonds 2022 Parks, Recreation & Open
Space (PROS) Plan. Additionally, recommendations 3.1 encourages the City to maintain, renovate, or replace aging or
damaged infrastructure to ensure public accessibility, use and safety; recommendation 3.10 explicitly states the City
should develop and implement stream management plans to restore degraded stream habitat in developed parks such as
Shell Creek at Yost Park; recommendation 5.2 states the City should repair and improve or extend trails and boardwalks
to allow improved public access to natural areas for nature / wildlife viewing, hiking and outdoor experience and finally,
recommendation 6.2 to implement upgrades and improvements to park facilities to conform with the American with
Disabilities Act (ADA) and ensure universal accessibility.
Estimated Cost: Phase 1 - $250,000 & Phase 2 - $380,000 = $630,000 total
2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 Total
Planning & Design (P8) $240,000 $240,000
Construction (R19) – Bridge, Trail, Stream $200,000 $180,000 $380,000
Total Expenses $240,000 $200,000 $180,000 $620,000
Real Estate Excise Tax II – Fund 125 $240,000 $200,000 $180,000 $620,000
Total Revenue $240,000 $200,000 $180,000 $620,000
Unsecured Funding $0 $0 $0
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 444/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 444/524
Page 10
Parks & Recreation
Playground Replacement #1– P9, R8
Project Summary: This project will revitalize one of the aging play areas in the Edmonds park system. Key components of
the project include:
• Replacement of the existing playground equipment
• Design and construction of an ADA-accessible playground with new fall surfacing to meet current safety
standards, including the potential for inclusive-level design to support children of all abilities
As the smallest and most limited playground in the city’s inventory, Sierra Park’s 27 year old play area an example of one
of the potential playgrounds that could be selected for replacement to better serve the surrounding community and
promote equitable access to outdoor recreation.
Project Justification: This project supports three goals and three objectives outlined in the City of Edmonds’ 2022 Parks,
Recreation & Open Space (PROS) Plan. Additionally, recommendation 3.1 encourages ongoing investment in park
infrastructure, and recommendation 3.4 explicitly calls for the replacement of playgrounds at Maplewood Hill Park, Sierra
Park, and Yost Memorial Park, underscoring the importance and timeliness of this project.
Estimated Cost: $400,000*
2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 Total
Planning & Design (P9) $50,000 $50,000
Construction (R8) – Playground Replacement $350,000 $350,000
Total Expenses $50,000 $350,000 $400,000
Park Impact Fees – Fund 332-100 $50,000 $350,000 $400,000
Total Revenue $50,000 $350,000 $400,000
Unsecured Funding $0 $0 $0
*Project is both in Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and Capital Facilities Plan (CFP)
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 445/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 445/524
Page 11
Parks & Recreation
Yost Pool Upgrades & Renovation - R11
96th Ave W & Bowdoin Way, Yost Park
Project Summary: This project involves future repair and maintenance of Yost Pool. Built in the early 1970s, the pool is
now over 50 years old and requires ongoing maintenance to remain operational, safe, and compliant with modern
standards. The work will include structural evaluation, surface restoration, and replacement of aging amenities.
Project Justification: Yost Pool is a beloved community asset that supports year-round recreation, swim lessons, and
public health. However, its aging infrastructure presents operational challenges. Without timely repairs, the facility risks
reduced service or closure. The project is strongly supported by the City of Edmonds 2022 Parks, Recreation & Open Space
(PROS) Plan, aligning with seven goals and eleven objectives. It also supports recommendations 3.1 and 6.2, which
emphasize infrastructure renewal and climate-resilient design.
Estimated Cost: $200,000
2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 Total
Construction (R11) $100,000
$100,000
$200,000
Total Expenses $100,000 $100,000 $200,000
Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125 $100,000 $100,000 $200,000
Total Revenue $100,000 $100,000 $200,000
Unsecured Funding $0 $0 $0
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 446/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 446/524
Page 12
Parks & Recreation
Woodway Campus Athletic Complex Phase 1 Lighting – D20
23200 100th Ave. W
Project Summary: This project enhances a key multi-use athletic complex in Edmonds. Completion of phase 1 involves the
addition of lighting to the existing field-turf fields. In coordination with the Edmonds School District, the property owner.
The project includes engineering, permitting, installation, and long-term maintenance strategy development.
Project Justification: Adding lighting to the Phase 1 field will significantly increase its year-round usability. Located in a
densely populated area of Edmonds, the upgraded complex will significantly expand recreational access and programming
capacity to respond to high demand.
This partnership-driven improvement aligns with two goals and five objectives in City of Edmonds 2022 Parks, Recreation
& Open Space (PROS) Plan, specifically recommendation 3.2, which encourages expanded partnerships with the Edmonds
School District to increase public access to outdoor recreation. Due to the nature of both a public partnership and
expansion of an existing facility, this project has strong potential for partial grant funding.
Estimated Cost: Phase 1 Lighting: $1,500,000
2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 Total
Construction (D20) - Lighting $1,500,000 $1,500,000
Total Expenses $1,500,000 $1,500,000
Park Impact Fees – Fund 332-100 $500,000 $500,000
Total Revenue $500,000 $500,000
Unsecured Funding ($1,000,000) ($1,000,000)
*Project is both in Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and Capital Facilities Plan (CFP)
Phase 2
Phase 1
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 447/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 447/524
Page 13
Parks & Recreation
Marsh Boardwalk Replacement – D21, R20
180 West Dayton, Edmonds Marsh
Project Summary: This project initiates a comprehensive assessment of the aging Marsh Boardwalk. The work will evaluate
the structural integrity of the existing boardwalk, including architecture and engineering design for potential repair or full
replacement. It may also include the necessary development of construction drawings and the launch of a required and
complex environmental permitting process, given the sensitive wetland estuary environment.
Project Justification: The wooden deck of the boardwalk is approaching the end of its serviceable life, and early signs of
structural settlement into the Marsh suggest potential safety risks. Without intervention, the boardwalk may need to be
closed to the public due to unsafe surface conditions and trip hazards, limiting the only above surface access to one of
Edmonds most ecologically significant and publicly cherished natural areas.
This project supports five goals and eleven objectives outlined in the City of Edmonds’ 2022 Parks, Recreation & Open
Space (PROS) Plan. It also advances recommendations 3.1, 3.10, 5.2, and 6.2, which emphasize infrastructure renewal,
habitat protection, and climate-resilient design.
Estimated Cost: $25,000
2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 Total
Planning & Design (D21) $25,000 $25,000
Construction (R20)
Total Expenses $25,000 $25,000
Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125 $25,000 $25,000
Total Revenue $25,000 $25,000
Unsecured Funding $0 $0
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 448/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 448/524
Page 14
Parks & Recreation
Playground Replacement #2 – R12
Project Summary: This project will revitalize one of the aging play areas in the Edmonds park system. Key components
of the project include:
• Replacement of the existing playground equipment
• Design and construction of an ADA-accessible playground with new fall surfacing to meet current safety
standards, including the potential for inclusive-level design to support children of all abilities
At 38 years old, the Maplewood Hill Park playground is the oldest playground in the Edmonds park system and currently
consists of only a swing set. This playground is an example of one of the potential playgrounds that could be selected for
replacement to better serve the surrounding community and promote equitable access to outdoor recreation.
Project Justification: Replacing this aging play structure would enhance recreational opportunities for families and
children, improve equity in park amenities, and support long-term operational sustainability. This improvement is
supported by the City of Edmonds 2022 Parks, Recreation & Open Space (PROS) Plan, aligning with three goals and three
objectives. It also supports recommendation 3.1, which emphasizes infrastructure renewal, and recommendation 3.4,
which specifically calls for replacing playgrounds at Maplewood Hill Park, Sierra Park, and Yost Memorial Park.
Estimated Cost: $400,000*
2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 Total
Planning & Design (P10) $50,000 $50,000
Construction (R12) – Playground Replacement $350,000 $350,000
Total Expenses $50,000 $350,000 $400,000
Park Impact Fees – Fund 332-100 $50,000 $350,000 $400,000
Total Revenue $50,000 $350,000 $400,000
Unsecured Funding $0 $0 $0
*Project is both in Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and Capital Facilities Plan (CFP)
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 449/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 449/524
Page 15
Parks & Recreation
Neighborhood Park HWY 99 – P6 & D15
Project Summary: This project involves the acquisition, design, and development of a new neighborhood park in the HWY
99 corridor to address a significant gap in park services and inequities in parkland and recreation amenity distribution.
Once a site is secured, a community-driven Master Plan will be developed to guide the park’s design and programming.
Final development will be based on the outcomes of that plan, ensuring the park reflects the needs and priorities of
nearby residents.
Project Justification: The HWY 99 area is currently underserved by public parks, limiting access to outdoor recreation
and green space for residents in this densely populated corridor. Creating a new neighborhood park will improve equity
in park access, support community health, and enhance livability. The project is strongly supported by the City of
Edmonds 2022 Parks, Recreation & Open Space (PROS) Plan, aligning with three goals and eleven objectives. It also
supports recommendation 1, which calls for acquiring property for neighborhood parks in underserved areas such as the
HWY 99 corridor, and recommendation 6.2, which emphasizes climate-resilient and community-centered park
development.
Estimated Cost: $1,850,000*
2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 Total
Acquisition – Neighborhood Park HWY 99 (A3) $900,000 $900,000
Planning – Neighborhood Park HWY 99 (P6) $100,000 $100,000
Construction – Neighborhood Park HWY 99 (D15) $850,000 $850,000
Total Expenses $900,000 $100,000 $850,000 $1,850,000
Real Estate Excise Tax I - Fund 126 $900,000 $900,000
Park Impact Fees – Fund 332-100 $100,000 $850,000 $950,000
Total Revenue $900,000 $100,000 $850,000 $1,850,000
Unsecured Funding $0 $0 $0 $0
*Project is both in Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and Capital Facilities Plan (CFP)
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 450/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 450/524
Page 16
Parks & Recreation
Johnson Property - P5
9309 Bowdoin Way
Project Summary: This project initiates the first phase of design for the 1-acre property donated by Shirley Johnson in
2021. Following the removal of the house, outbuildings, and invasive vegetation in 2023, the site is now secured and ready
for planning. The master planning process will incorporate citywide goals from the Parks, Recreation & Open Space (PROS)
Plan, site-specific opportunities and constraints, donation conditions, and robust community input to shape future design
and use. The resulting plan will also serve as foundational documentation for future grant applications and phased
improvements.
Project Justification: This unique opportunity to transform a donated property into a public asset supports multiple
strategic priorities in the City of Edmonds 2022 PROS Plan. The project aligns with five goals and eleven objectives. It also
supports recommendation 3.1, which calls for maintaining, renovating, or replacing aging infrastructure to ensure public
accessibility, safety, and usability.
Estimated Cost: $50,000**
2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 Total
Planning & Design (P5) $50,000 $50,000
Total Expenses $50,000 $50,000
Park Impact Fees – Fund 332-100 $50,000 $50,000
Total Revenue $50,000 $50,000
Unsecured Funding $0 $0
*Project is both in Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and Capital Facilities Plan (CFP)
**Project funding removed via council budget amendment in 2024
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 451/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 451/524
Page 17
Parks & Recreation
Neighborhood Park SE 2 – A4, P7, D18
Project Summary: This project involves the acquisition, design, and future development of a new neighborhood park in
the Southeast Edmonds area to address a longstanding gap in park services and inequities in parkland distribution. Once
a site is acquired, a Master Plan will be developed in collaboration with the surrounding community to guide the park’s
design, amenities, and programming. Final development will be based on the outcomes of that plan, ensuring the park
reflects local needs and priorities.
Project Justification: The Southeast Edmonds area is currently underserved by public parks, limiting access to outdoor
recreation and green space for nearby residents. Creating a new neighborhood park will improve equity in park access,
support community health, and enhance livability. This project is strongly supported by the City of Edmonds 2022 Parks,
Recreation & Open Space (PROS) Plan, aligning with three goals and eleven objectives. It also supports recommendation
6.2, which emphasizes climate-resilient and community-centered park development, and recommendation 1, which calls
for acquiring property for neighborhood parks in underserved areas such as the South Edmonds area and the HWY 99
corridor.
Estimated Cost: $800,000*
2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 Total
Acquisition – Neighborhood Park SE 2 (A4) $700,000 $700,000
Planning – Neighborhood Park SE 2 (P7) $100,000 $100,000
Construction – Neighborhood Park SE 2 (D18)
Total Expenses $700,000 $100,000 $800,000
Real Estate Excise Tax I - Fund 126 $700,000 $700,000
Park Impact Fees – Fund 332-100 $100,000 $100,000
Total Revenue $700,000 $100,000 $800,000
Unsecured Funding $0 $0 $0
*Project is both in Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and Capital Facilities Plan (CFP)
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 452/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 452/524
Page 18
Parks & Recreation
Yost Pool Replacement – R15
96th Ave W & Bowdoin Way, Yost Park
Project Summary: Yost Pool, built nearly 50 years ago, remains a vital recreational and wellness facility for Edmonds
residents and visitors. It provides year-round access to swimming, water safety education for youth, and opportunities for
healthy, active lifestyles across all age groups. This project proposes a full replacement of the aging facility to ensure long-
term safety, accessibility, and operational sustainability. Funding has not yet been identified and may require partnerships
and voter approval.
Project Justification: The existing pool infrastructure is outdated and increasingly costly to maintain. A full replacement
would modernize the facility, expand programming potential, and improve energy efficiency and accessibility. This project
is supported by the City of Edmonds 2022 Parks, Recreation & Open Space (PROS) Plan, aligning with four goals and six
objectives. It also supports recommendations 3.1, 4.1, 4.2, and 6.2, with recommendation 4 explicitly stating “replace Yost
Pool.”
Estimated Cost: $30,000,000*
2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 Total
Planning & Construction (R15) $30,000,000 $30,000,000
Total Expenses $30,000,000 $30,000,000
Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125
Fund 332 Balance + Park Impact Fees
Secured Grants
Bonds
Total Revenue $0 $0
Unsecured Funding ($30,000,000) ($30,000,000)
*Project is both in Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and Capital Facilities Plan (CFP)
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 453/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 453/524
Page 19
Parks & Recreation
Parks & Facilities Maintenance Building - P1 & D2
600 3rd Avenue South, City Park
Project Summary: This project proposes the replacement of the aging Parks and Facilities Maintenance building located
in City Park along with renovation of the adjacent yard area. The current facility, over 40 years old, is undersized and no
longer meets the operational needs of staff, vehicles, equipment, and mechanical workspaces. It also lacks adequate
employee support facilities, creating inefficiencies and safety concerns in daily operations.
Project Justification: The Parks and Facilities Divisions have outgrown the existing space, which now serves multiple
conflicting functions including equipment repair, locker room, meeting space, and limited computer access for more than
20 full-time employees. These constraints hinder work efficiency and compromise safety. Replacing the facility will
improve operational capacity, staff well-being, and long-term maintenance of city parks and capital assets. This project
is supported by the City of Edmonds 2022 Parks, Recreation & Open Space (PROS) Plan, aligning with Goal 9 Park
Operations & Administration, Objectives 9.3 (enhance staff capacity and resources), and 9.9 (ensure safe and efficient
maintenance facilities).
Estimated Cost: TBD*
*Project is both in Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and Capital Facilities Plan (CFP)
2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 Total
Planning & Design (P1)
Construction (D2)
Total Expenses TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125
Bond Proceeds
Operating Contribution – General Fund
Park Donations
Total Revenue TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
Unsecured Funding TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 454/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 454/524
Page 20
Parks & Recreation
Edmonds Marsh-Estuary Expansion & Restoration - A1, P4, D9 & D1
Edmonds Marsh - City of Edmonds Marsh, Marina Beach Park and property owned by Unocal (Chevron)
Project Summary: This transformative project seeks to reconnect the Puget Sound with the Edmonds Marsh near-shore
estuary by restoring natural tidal exchange. It will impact the existing Marina Beach Park and its proposed renovation,
including daylighting Willow Creek within the park and marsh. The project also envisions the acquisition or use of the
adjacent 21-acre Unocal property to support a larger estuary restoration effort. Once acquired, an integrated restoration
plan will be developed to reestablish tidal wetland functions that support salmon recovery, wildlife conservation,
environmental education, and improved public access for recreation and nature viewing.
Project Justification: Restoring the marsh estuary will enable salmon migration into Willow Creek, support migratory
birds and waterfowl, reestablish native saltwater-freshwater ecosystems, and address climate impacts such as sea level
rise. This project is strongly supported by the City of Edmonds 2022 Parks, Recreation & Open Space (PROS) Plan, aligning
with five goals and eight objectives. It also supports recommendation 2.1 which states, develop a restoration plan for the
Edmonds Marsh, recommendation 2.2 to expand the estuary to include the Unocal property, and recommendation 3.11
to enhance natural resource conservation and public access in waterfront areas.
Estimated Cost: TBD Acquisition and Planning + Restoration + Marina Beach Park renovation*
Continued on next page…
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 455/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 455/524
Page 21
Edmonds Marsh-Estuary Expansion & Restoration– continued.
2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 Total
Land Acquisition (A1)
Master Plan (P4)
Master Plan Implementation (D9)
Restoration (D1) - TBD
Total Expenses TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125
Real Estate Excise Tax I – Fund 126
Fund 332 Balance + Park Impact Fees
Bond Proceeds
Secured Grants
Tree Fund 143 – Land Acquisition
Park Donations
Operating Contribution – General Fund
Stormwater – Fund 422
Total Revenue TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
Unsecured Funding TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
*Project is both in Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and Capital Facilities Plan (CFP)
Expense estimates and funding sources changed to TBD per Council direction December 2022.
Project Accounting #M070
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 456/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 456/524
Page 22
2027-2032
Parks Capital Improvement
& Capital Facilities Plan
PROGRAMS
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 457/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 457/524
Page 23
Parks & Recreation
ADA Improvements & Replacement – R16
Project Summary: This program addresses systemic accessibility upgrades across Edmonds parks, open spaces, trails, and
recreation facilities. Examples include accessible restroom and playground access at Seaview Park, ADA upgrades at the
Marina Beach Park dog park, and improved access to the Edmonds Marsh viewing pier and platform. Funding will support
professional design, permitting, and construction coordination for these improvements.
Project Justification: These upgrades are essential for compliance with ADA standards and building codes, and they reflect
Edmonds commitment to universal access and inclusive design. Many existing facilities lack adequate accessibility, limiting
use for residents with disabilities and mobility challenges. This project is supported by three goals and six objectives in the
2022 Parks, Recreation & Open Space (PROS) Plan. It also supports recommendation 3.1, which emphasizes “ensuring
public accessibility,” recommendation 6.2, which calls for ADA-compliant improvements to park facilities, and
recommendation 6.3, which specifically identifies restroom renovations at Olympic Beach, Seaview Park, and Brackett’s
Landing North.
Estimated Cost: $1,075,000
2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 Total
Construction (R16) $75,000 $50,000 $50,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $1,075,000
Total Expenses $75,000 $50,000 $50,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $1,075,000
Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125 $75,000 $50,000 $50,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $1,075,000
Total Revenue $75,000 $50,000 $50,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $1,075,000
Unsecured Funding $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 458/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 458/524
Page 24
Parks & Recreation
Citywide Park Improvements / Capital Replacement Program - R17
Project Summary: This program addresses a significant backlog of deferred maintenance projects across Edmonds parks,
open spaces, trails, and recreation facilities. With the hiring of a Parks Capital Project Manager in 2022, the City of
Edmonds is now equipped to make steady progress on system-wide repairs, renovations, replacements, and ADA
accessibility upgrades. Approximately 90% of the Project Manager’s salary and benefits are allocated directly to these
capital improvement efforts. Funding will support design, permitting, and construction coordination for priority projects
identified in the 2022 PROS Plan.
Project Justification: Insufficiently maintained parks and facilities lead to excessive and avoidable costs, increased liability,
and reduced public satisfaction. Addressing deferred maintenance is essential to preserving infrastructure, improving
safety, and enhancing the quality of life for Edmonds residents. This program is supported by six goals, twenty-one
objectives and five recommendations in the 2022 Parks, Recreation and Opens Space (PROS) Plan. Recommendation 3.1
is to “Maintain, renovate, or replace aging or damaged infrastructure in existing City properties to ensure public
accessibility, use and safety” and additional recommendations are found in 3.7, 6.2, 6.3 and 6.4.
Estimated Cost: $3,891,000 (6-year total)
2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 Total
Repair & Maintenance $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $1,800,000
Professional Services $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $900,000
Capital Projects Manager $190,000 $195,000 $201,000 $207,000 $213,000 $219,000 $1,225,000
Total Expenses $640,000 $645,000 $651,000 $657,000 $663,000 $669,000 $3,925,000
Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125 $640,000 $645,000 $651,000 $657,000 $663,000 $669,000 $3,925,000
Total Revenue $640,000 $645,000 $651,000 $657,000 $663,000 $669,000 $3,925,000
Unsecured Funding $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 459/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 459/524
Page 25
2027-2032
Parks Capital Improvement & Capital Facilities Plan
FUND DETAIL
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 460/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 460/524
REET I Fund 126
REET I (Fund 126) Restricted for Land Acquisition - Revenue 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 6-Year Total
Land Acquisition "Fence" Beginning Balance $ 1,215,325 $ 1,315,325 $ 1,415,325 $ 1,515,325 $ 715,325 $ 115,325 $ 6,291,950
Land Acquisition Council Allocation $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 600,000
1,315,325$ 1,415,325$ 1,515,325$ 1,615,325$ 815,325$ 215,325$ 6,891,950$
2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 6-Year Total
A1 Edmonds Marsh Estuary Restoration (Acquisition) $ -
A3 Neighborhood Park - HWY 99 (Acquisition) $ 900,000 $ 900,000
A4 Neighborhood Park - SE2 (Acquisition) $ 700,000 $ 700,000
-$ -$ -$ 900,000$ 700,000$ -$ 4,100,000$
1,315,325$ 1,415,325$ 1,515,325$ 715,325$ 115,325$ 215,325$ 2,791,950$
REET I (Fund 126) Expenditures - Non Land Acquisition 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 6-Year Total
Debt Interest & Principal Marina Beach (ends 2031) $ 80,063 $ 81,975 $ 80,287 $ 83,600 $ 81,800 $ - $ 407,725
Debt Interest & Principal Civic Park (ends 2039) $ 330,375 $ 334,375 $ 327,625 $ 330,625 $ 333,193 $ 335,406 $ 1,991,599
410,438$ 416,350$ 407,912$ 414,225$ 414,993$ 335,406$ $ 2,399,324
REET II (Fund 125) Revenue 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 6-Year Total
Real Estate Excise Tax (REET) II - Fund 125 $ 410,438 $ 416,350 $ 407,912 $ 414,225 $ 414,993 $ 335,406 $ 2,399,324
410,438$ 416,350$ 407,912$ 414,225$ 414,993$ 335,406$ 2,399,324$
(C) Ending Fund Balance (Land Acquisition) (A-B)
(D) TOTAL PARKS REET I (Fund 126) Revenue
(D) PARKS REET I (Fund 126) Expenditures - Non Land Acquisition
(B) REET I (Fund 126) Restricted for Land Acquisition - Expenditures
(A) REET I (Fund 126) Restricted for Land Acquisition - Revenue
REET I (Fund 126) Restricted for Land Acquisition - Expenditures
Page 26
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 461/524
Packet pg. 461/524
REET II Fund 125
REET II (Fund 125) Expenditures 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 6-Year Total
P8 Shell Creek Restoration Phase 1 (Yost Park) (Carryforward) $ 240,000 $ 240,000
R19 Shell Creek Restoration Phase 2 (Yost Park) (Carryforward) $ 200,000 $ 180,000 $ 380,000
R20 Marsh Boardwalk Replacement (Assessment) $ 25,000 $ 25,000
R11 Yost Pool Upgrades & Renovation $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 200,000
P4 Edmonds Marsh Estuary Restoration (Master Plan) $ -
R16 ADA Improvements $ 75,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 1,075,000
R17 Citywide Park Improvements / Capital Replacement Program 450,000$ 450,000$ 450,000$ 450,000$ 450,000$ 450,000$ $ 2,700,000
Capital Projects Manager (90% Salary + Benefits)190,000$ 195,000$ 201,000$ 207,000$ 213,000$ 219,000$ $ 1,225,000
955,000$ 995,000$ 1,006,000$ 957,000$ 963,000$ 969,000$ 5,845,000$
REET II (Fund 125) Revenue 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 6-Year Total
Real Estate Excise Tax (REET) II - Fund 125 $ 955,000 $ 995,000 $ 1,006,000 $ 957,000 $ 963,000 $ 969,000 $ 5,845,000
955,000$ 995,000$ 1,006,000$ 957,000$ 963,000$ 969,000$ 5,845,000$
(C) TOTAL PARKS REET II (Fund 125) Expenditures
(D) TOTAL PARKS REET I (Fund 126) Revenue
Project Type: A: Acquisition - R: Replacement/Upgrade - P: Master Planning - D: Development (new)
Page 27
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 462/524
Packet pg. 462/524
Fund 332
Fund 332 Expenditures - Unfunded / Future Grant Funded 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 6-Year Total
D20 Woodway Campus Athletic Complex - Phase I - Lighting $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000
R15 Pool Replacement 30,000,000$ $ 30,000,000
D9 Edmonds Marsh Estuary Restoration (Master Plan Implementation) $ -
P1 Parks Facilities M&O Building (Design) $ -
$ - $ 1,000,000 -$ $ - $ 30,000,000 -$ 31,000,000$
Fund 332-000 Revenue 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 6-Year Total
Unsecured Funding - Woodway Campus Athletic Complex Phase I $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000
Unsecured Funding (Bonds, Levy, Misc.) Pool Replacement $ 30,000,000 $ 30,000,000
Unsecured Grants - Marsh Estuary Restoration $ -
Unsecured Funding Park Facilities M&O Building $ -
$ - $ 1,000,000 -$ $ - $ 30,000,000 -$ 31,000,000$
2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032
(E) Beginning Fund Balance (332)115,749$ 121,536$ 127,613$ 133,994$ 140,693$ 147,728$
(F) Investment Interest (5%)5,787$ 6,077$ 6,381$ 6,700$ 7,035$ 7,386$
(D) Revenue - Non Park Impact Fees $ - $ 1,000,000 -$ $ - $ 30,000,000 -$
(C) Expenditures $ - $ 1,000,000 -$ $ - $ 30,000,000 -$
121,536$ 127,613$ 133,994$ 140,693$ 147,728$ 155,115$
Fund 332-100 Expenditures - Park Impact Fees 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 6-Year Total
P9 Playground Replacement #1 - Design & Planning $ 50,000 $ 50,000
R8 Playground #1 Replacement - Construction $ 350,000 $ 350,000
D20 Woodway Campus Athletic Complex - Phase I - Lighting $ 500,000 $ 500,000
P10 Playground Replacement #2 - Design & Planning $ 50,000 $ 50,000
R12 Playground Replacement #2 - Construction $ 350,000 $ 350,000
D15 Neighborhood Park - HWY 99 (Park Development) $ 100,000 $ 850,000 $ 950,000
D18 Neighborhood Park - SE2 (Park Development)100,000$ $ 100,000
P5 Johnson Property (Master Plan) $ 50,000 $ 50,000
$ - 50,000$ 900,000$ 350,000$ 150,000$ 950,000$ 2,400,000$
2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032
(E) Beginning Fund Balance (332-100) - Park Impact Fees 732,396$ 969,015$ 1,167,466$ 525,839$ 402,131$ 472,238$
(F) Investment Interest (5%)36,620$ 48,451$ 58,373$ 26,292$ 20,107$ 23,612$
(D) Revenue - Park Impact Fees Only 200,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$
(C) Expenditures $ - 50,000$ 900,000$ 350,000$ 150,000$ 950,000$
969,015$ 1,167,466$ 525,839$ 402,131$ 472,238$ (254,150)$
(C) TOTAL Fund 332 Expenditures - Unfunded / Future Grant Funded
(D) TOTAL Fund 332-000 Revenue
Fund 332 Parks Fund 6-Year Overview
(H) Ending Fund Balance (E+F+D-C)
Project Type: A: Acquisition - R: Replacement/Upgrade - P: Master Planning - D: Development (new)
Fund 332-100 - Park Impact Fee Summary
(C) TOTAL Fund 332-100 Expenditures
(I) Ending Fund Balance (E+F+D-C)
Page 28
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 463/524
Packet pg. 463/524
PARKS CIP / CFP COMPARISON 2027 - 32 vs. 2026-31
Type PROJECT NAME CFP DESCRIPTION
Parks None
Type PROJECT NAME CFP DESCRIPTION
Parks Waterfront Buoys Installation Project Project completion scheduled for 2026.
Type PROJECT NAME CFP CHANGE
Parks Shell Creek Restoration Phase 1 & 2 Moved to 2027-29 vs. 2026-27.
Parks Playground Replacement #1 X Did not specify specific playground such as Sierra Park in previous version.
Parks Marsh Boardwalk Replacement Assessment moved to 2029 from 2028.
Parks Yost Pool Upgrades & Renovation X Moved up to 2028 & 2029 from 2029 due to grant opportunity for efficiency study. Funding reduced by $150K.
Parks Woodway Campus Athletic Complex - Phase I - Lighting X Moved from 2028 to 2029 to align with RCO grant cycle.
Parks Playground Replacement #2 X Did not specify specific playground such as Maplewood Hill Park in previous version.
Parks Neighborhood Park - HWY 99 X Acquisition moved to 2030 vs. 2028. Master Plan / Construction moved to 2031-32 vs. 2030-31.
Parks Neighborhood Park - SE 2 X Acquisition moved to 2031 vs. 2030. Master Plan moved to 2032 vs. 2031.
Parks Pool Replacement X Moved to 2032 vs. 2031
Parks ADA Improvements & Replacement Program 6-year funding increased $175K; funding now in every year vs. alternating years.
PROJECTS REVISED
PROJECTS ADDED
PROJECTS REMOVED
Page 29
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 464/524
Packet pg. 464/524
2026 Comprehensive Plan Amendment: 2027–2032 Capital
Facilities Plan and Capital Improvement Program
Planning Board
Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation
Findings
1) History. The City biennially updates its Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) and Capital Improvement Program
(CIP) to identify, prioritize, and plan capital investments needed to implement the Comprehensive Plan.
The proposed 2027–2032 CFP/CIP is being considered as an amendment to the 2026 Comprehensive
Plan under City file AMD2026-0004.
2) Geographic Location. The proposed update applies citywide. It includes both geographically
identified projects and programs for improvements to public infrastructure and facilities throughout
Edmonds.
3) Proposed Action. The proposed amendment would incorporate the 2027–2032 CFP/CIP into the
Comprehensive Plan. The six-year program identifies proposed projects, timing, costs, and funding
sources; the CFP also identifies longer-range capital needs. The program addresses transportation,
parks and recreation, water, stormwater, sewer, City facilities, and the wastewater treatment plant.
4) Public Hearings and Notice. Notice was published September 11, 2026, identifying a Planning Board
public hearing that was held on September 23, 2026. No public testimony was received.
5) Planning Board Comprehensive Plan Amendment Findings. Pursuant to ECDC 20.00.050,
amendments to the Comprehensive Plan must satisfy the applicable findings established in that
section. As the proposed 2027–2032 CFP/CIP constitutes an update to the City's Comprehensive Plan,
the Planning Board has evaluated the proposal against these criteria and makes the following findings:
a. Comprehensive Plan Consistency and Public Interest — ECDC 20.00.050(A). The proposed program
identifies infrastructure and facility investments that support implementation of the
Comprehensive Plan. Projects and programs addressing transportation safety and access, utility
reliability, public facilities, parks, environmental restoration, and accessibility serve identified
community needs. The six-year and longer-range schedules provide a coordinated basis for future
capital planning and prioritization. On that basis, the update is consistent with the Comprehensive
Plan’s implementation function and is in the public interest.
b. Public Health, Safety, and Welfare — ECDC 20.00.050(B). The update includes pavement
preservation, traffic and pedestrian safety, water and sewer system upgrades, stormwater and
wastewater improvements, accessibility projects, and maintenance or replacement of aging public
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 465/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 465/524
assets. Planning these improvements does not, in itself, authorize construction or remove
applicable permitting and environmental review requirements. The amendment is not expected to
be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, or welfare.
c. Balance of Land Uses — ECDC 20.00.050(C). The proposed amendment is a citywide capital
planning update, not a change to the Future Land Use Map or zoning map. It identifies public
improvements to serve existing and planned development and does not propose changes to the
allocation of residential, commercial, industrial, or other land use designations. The amendment
therefore maintains the appropriate balance of land uses within the City.
d. Policy Plan Map — ECDC 20.00.050(D). The proposal does not amend the Comprehensive Plan
policy plan map or request a land use designation for individual parcels. Accordingly, the parcel-
specific suitability finding in subsection (D) is not applicable.
6) Commerce and SEPA Review. The amendments are being processed as part of the 2026
Comprehensive Plan docket, including required state agency and environmental review prior to final
City Council action.
Conclusions
1) The 2027–2032 CFP/CIP provides the capital planning framework for implementing the 2026
Comprehensive Plan and coordinating improvements to public infrastructure and facilities.
2) Based on the findings above, the proposed amendment satisfies ECDC 20.00.050(A), (B), and (C): it is
consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and in the public interest; it is not detrimental to public
health, safety, or welfare; and it maintains the appropriate balance of land uses.
3) ECDC 20.00.050(D) does not apply because no amendment to the Comprehensive Plan policy plan
map is proposed.
4) The plan establishes priorities and identifies prospective funding; individual project implementation
remains contingent on funding, budgeting, and applicable approvals.
5) After review of the CIP/CFP, the Planning Board continues to have concerns about deferred
replacement and upgrades of important city infrastructure that increases the risk of rising financial
obligations in the future.
Recommendation
Based upon these findings and conclusions, and subject to consideration of testimony and the entire
record at the September 23, 2026 public hearing, the Planning Board recommends that the City Council
adopt the proposed 2027–2032 Capital Facilities Plan and Capital Improvement Program as an update to
the 2026 Comprehensive Plan.
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 466/524
Item 9.1
Packet pg. 466/524
1
0
8
8
Agenda Item 9.2
Edmonds City Council
Regular Meeting
October 27, 2026
TITLE:2027-2028 Proposed Biennium Budget Public Hearing (Third
Reading)
DEPARTMENT:Finance
PRESENTER:Kisha Post
NEEDED FROM COUNCIL:Informational
RECOMMENDATION:Finance will present information on the 2027-2028 Proposed
Biennium Budget and there will be opportunity for public
comment.
BUDGET:
Total Dollar Amount:$305M ☒ 2027-28 Biennium Budget
Fund(s):All Funds ☐ Budget Reallocation Required
☐ No Budget Impact
PROBLEM/ISSUE STATEMENT:
CONTEXT, ANALYSIS, & ALTERNATIVES:
This proposed budget presented to City Council and to the public adheres to the standards of
the Government Financial Officers Association (GFOA), State Auditor’s Office
(SAO), Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP), the Revised Code of Washington
(RCW), and the Edmonds Municipal Code (EMC).
BUDGET IMPACTS:
The proposed 2027-2028 Biennial Budget impacts all revenues and expenditures for all funds.
ITEM HISTORY:
Council Budget Retreats took place on May 30, July 8 and September 11.
Mayor Rosen presented the proposed 2027-2028 Biennial Budget to Edmonds City
Council and the public on Monday, October 5.
Mayor Rosen Briefed Council on select components of the proposed 2027-2028
Biennial Budget on Tuesday, October 6.
Mayor, City Administrator, and Department Directors engaged in conversation and
answered initial questions from Council on the proposed 2027-2028 Biennial Budget on
Tuesday, October 13.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
The Mayor’s Proposed 2027-2028 Biennial Budget is posted and can be found on the city
website on the Finance page under Budget Reports at the following link:
https://www.edmondswa.gov/government/departments/finance/budget_reports
Item 9.2
Packet pg. 467/524
Item 9.2
Packet pg. 467/524
1
0
8
8
ATTACHMENTS:
2027-2028 Biennial Budget – Public Hearing Presentation
Item 9.2
Packet pg. 468/524
Item 9.2
Packet pg. 468/524
2027-2028BiennialBudget
Public Hearing
Presented by Kisha Post
Edmonds City Council,
October 27, 2026
Item 9.2
Packet pg. 469/524
Item 9.2
Packet pg. 469/524
2
November 2023
Council Declares Fiscal Emergency
October 27, 2026Budget Public Hearing
Item 9.2
Packet pg. 470/524
Item 9.2
Packet pg. 470/524
3
Edmonds is not alone
October 27, 2026Budget Public Hearing
Item 9.2
Packet pg. 471/524
Item 9.2
Packet pg. 471/524
4
Washington State Biennium $4.3B
Lynnwood 2027-28 $2.4M
Seattle over 3 years $500M
Snohomish County 2027-28 $56M
Thurston County $36M
Tacoma $40M
Skagit County $19M
Spokane $13M
Bellingham $10M
Anacortes $9M
Yakima $9M
Everett $7.9M
Olympia $6.5M
Mount Vernon $6M
Mountlake Terrace $4.2M
Lacey $3M
Kitsap County $2.8M
Moses Lake $1.5M
Local Shortfalls
Budget Public Hearing October 27, 2026
Item 9.2
Packet pg. 472/524
Item 9.2
Packet pg. 472/524
5
Costs increased faster than revenues
1% limit on property tax
Conflicting economic development strategies
Resistance to alternative revenue sources
Used one time money (ARPA / Loan)
Spent reserves
Delayed and deferred important work
Over anticipated revenues
Under anticipated expenses
Competition for staff
It Wasn’t One Single Action
Budget Public Hearing October 27, 2026
Item 9.2
Packet pg. 473/524
Item 9.2
Packet pg. 473/524
6
Allowed Property Tax Increases vs
Consumer Price Index (CPI)
Budget Public Hearing October 27, 2026
Item 9.2
Packet pg. 474/524
Item 9.2
Packet pg. 474/524
7
Sno911 $33,000
Fuel $85,000
Unfunded Mandates (i.e.: police training) $150,000
WCIA (municipal liability insurance) $173,000
Jail Costs $227,533
Prosecuting Attorney Services $285,863*
Utility increases $289,000
Defense Attorney Services $406,793
Benefits $1,464,539 17%
Examples of Cost Increases
1% Property Tax Increase = $118,000
Budget Public Hearing October 27, 2026
Item 9.2
Packet pg. 475/524
Item 9.2
Packet pg. 475/524
8
Where your property tax dollars go
63%
Budget Public Hearing October 27, 2026
Item 9.2
Packet pg. 476/524
Item 9.2
Packet pg. 476/524
9
Where your sales tax dollars go
Mayor’s 2027 – 2028 Budget Presentation To CouncilBudget Public Hearing October 27, 2026
Item 9.2
Packet pg. 477/524
Item 9.2
Packet pg. 477/524
10
•Eliminated positions
•Unfunded positions
•Eliminated programs
•Eliminated purchases
•Paused Boards &
Commissions
•Eliminated rentals
•Reduced overtime
•Staff furloughs
•Modified staff and expense allocations
•Sold city assets
•Closed the neighborhood City Hall
•Reduced hardware and software
licenses
•Reduced use of consultants
•Reduced non-required training
•Annexed into the Regional Fire
Authority
•Eliminated non-required memberships
Reductions
Budget Public Hearing October 27, 2026
Item 9.2
Packet pg. 478/524
Item 9.2
Packet pg. 478/524
11
•Increased program fees
•Increased concession rates
•Increased leases for some tenants
•Introduced automated enforcement tools
•Contracted services to other cities
•Received new grants
•Modified investments
•Eliminated rentals
•Reduced overtime
•Introduced public safety sales tax
•Introduced transportation benefit district
•Internal loan
•Increased utility tax
Temporary
Diversified Revenue Streams
Budget Public Hearing October 27, 2026
Item 9.2
Packet pg. 479/524
Item 9.2
Packet pg. 479/524
12
This 2027–2028
proposed budget is
balanced… and is
an investment plan
Budget Public Hearing October 27, 2026
Item 9.2
Packet pg. 480/524
Item 9.2
Packet pg. 480/524
13
If you could only pick one issue, what do you think should be the top priority for the city of Edmonds government to address the next two years?
2026 Statistically Valid Community Survey
Resident Top Priorities
Budget Public Hearing October 27, 2026
Item 9.2
Packet pg. 481/524
Item 9.2
Packet pg. 481/524
14
Financial Stability
Strategic Clarity & Direction
Prioritization, Trade-offs & Capacity
Economic Development
2026 Council Priorities
Budget Public Hearing October 27, 2026
Item 9.2
Packet pg. 482/524
Item 9.2
Packet pg. 482/524
15
Parks and Recreation
Public Works & Utilities
Police
Planning and Development
Finance
Human Resources
Information Services
Legal
City Clerk
City Council
Mayor & City Administrator
Budget Public Hearing October 27, 2026
Item 9.2
Packet pg. 483/524
Item 9.2
Packet pg. 483/524
16
Funds
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
G
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t
F
u
n
d
s
Sp
e
c
i
a
l
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
F
u
n
d
s
In
t
e
r
n
a
l
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
F
u
n
d
s
Use:
Primary operating fund
Use:
Restricted or committed for
specific purposes
Example:
Street fund
Use:
Goods or services to other parts of
the city
Example:
Police and parks
En
t
e
r
p
r
i
s
e
F
u
n
d
s
Use:
Goods or services provided for a fee
Example:
Water Utility Fund
(Must cover 100%)
Example:
Fleet and IT
Budget Public Hearing October 27, 2026
Item 9.2
Packet pg. 484/524
Item 9.2
Packet pg. 484/524
17
KEY ASSUMPTIONS
Revenue
Property Taxes
Retail Sales Taxes
Other Sales Taxes
Utility Taxes
Other Taxes
Licenses/Permits/Franchise
Construction Permits
Grants
State Revenues
Charges for Goods & Services
Interfund Service Charges
Fines & Forfeitures
Miscellaneous Revenues
Interfund Loan
Transfers
Other Financing Sources
Total Revenues
Expenditures
Labor
Benefits
Supplies
Services
Capital
Debt Service
Transfers
Total Expenditures
Budget Public Hearing October 27, 2026
Item 9.2
Packet pg. 485/524
Item 9.2
Packet pg. 485/524
18
General Fund Revenues by Type (001)
Retail Sales Taxes
23%
Property Taxes
22%
Utility Taxes
21%
Interfund Service
Charges
10%
Fines & Forfeitures
6%
Charges for Goods & Services
6%
Other Sales Taxes
4%
Licenses/Permits/Franchise
4%State Revenues
2%
Miscellaneous
Revenues
1%Other Taxes
1%
Budget Public Hearing October 27, 2026
Item 9.2
Packet pg. 486/524
Item 9.2
Packet pg. 486/524
19
General Fund Expenses by Type (001)
Labor
48%
Services
28%
Benefits
17%
Debt Service
5%
Supplies
1%
Transfers
1%
i.e.
Contracts
Utilities
Insurance
Budget Public Hearing October 27, 2026
Item 9.2
Packet pg. 487/524
Item 9.2
Packet pg. 487/524
20
General Fund Expenses by Department (001)
Police
37%
Municipal Courts
5%
Legal Services
5%Parks & Recreation
10%
Non-Departmental
9%
Planning & Development
8%
Engineering
8%
Facilities Maintenance
5%
Finance
3%
Human Resources
2%
City Administrator
2%
Public Works
Administration
2%City Clerk
2%City Council
1%Mayor
1%
47%
Budget Public Hearing October 27, 2026
Item 9.2
Packet pg. 488/524
Item 9.2
Packet pg. 488/524
21
General Fund Biennial 2027/2028 Ending
Ending Fund
Balance
$6,492,761
Contingency Reserve Fund
$2,228,672
Revenue Less Expenses
$2,578,740
*Does not include any voter approved assumptions
Budget Public Hearing October 27, 2026
Item 9.2
Packet pg. 489/524
Item 9.2
Packet pg. 489/524
22Budget Public Hearing October 27, 2026
Item 9.2
Packet pg. 490/524
Item 9.2
Packet pg. 490/524
23
Our future
gap without
change
General Fund Revenues General Fund Expenses
Budget Public Hearing October 27, 2026
Item 9.2
Packet pg. 491/524
Item 9.2
Packet pg. 491/524
24
Ending fund
balance
without change
Budget Public Hearing October 27, 2026
Item 9.2
Packet pg. 492/524
Item 9.2
Packet pg. 492/524
25
General Funds
Budget Public Hearing October 27, 2026
Item 9.2
Packet pg. 493/524
Item 9.2
Packet pg. 493/524
26
Special Revenue Funds
Budget Public Hearing October 27, 2026
Item 9.2
Packet pg. 494/524
Item 9.2
Packet pg. 494/524
27
Debt, Capital, Enterprise & Service Funds
Budget Public Hearing October 27, 2026
Item 9.2
Packet pg. 495/524
Item 9.2
Packet pg. 495/524
28
All Funds At A Glance
Budget Public Hearing October 27, 2026
Item 9.2
Packet pg. 496/524
Item 9.2
Packet pg. 496/524
29
Thank you
Budget Public Hearing October 27, 2026
Item 9.2
Packet pg. 497/524
Item 9.2
Packet pg. 497/524
Agenda Item .
Edmonds City Council
Regular Meeting
October 27, 2026
TITLE:Public Hearing: Resolution expressing the Edmonds City Council's
position on Initiative Measure No. IL26-001 concerning parental
rights relating to their children in public school (First Reading)
DEPARTMENT:City Council Office
PRESENTER:Council President Michelle Dotsch
NEEDED FROM COUNCIL:Informational
RECOMMENDATION:Council may adopt a resolution of support, a resolution of
opposition, or to take no action.
BUDGET:
Total Dollar Amount:N/A Approved in Budget
Fund(s):N/A Budget Reallocation Required
No Budget Impact
PROBLEM/ISSUE STATEMENT:
Initiative Measure No. IL26-001 will appear on the November 3, 2026 general election ballot.
According to the ballot title published in the Washington State Voters' Pamphlet, the measure
"concerns parental rights relating to their children in public school" and "would repeal
amendments to a statute listing certain rights of parents and guardians of public-school
children and re-enact the law as it was originally enacted by Initiative to the Legislature 2081."
(Voters' Pamphlet, p. 15.)
CONTEXT, ANALYSIS, & ALTERNATIVES:
The Explanatory Statement written by the Office of the Attorney General summarizes current
law, under which the Legislature in 2024 enacted a statute listing certain rights of parents and
legal guardians of public-school children, which was amended in 2025. If approved, the
measure would repeal the 2025 amendments and re-enact the statute as it existed following its
original enactment, modifying certain existing rights (including the time for providing school
records and the circumstances for notifying parents of law-enforcement contact with their
child) and removing certain other provisions (including a current right to immediate notification
of alleged abuse by a school employee or contractor, the current right to file a complaint
relating to harassment, intimidation, and bullying, the current non-discrimination provision,
and provisions regarding enrollment, language access, and special education rights). (Voters'
Pamphlet, pp. 17–18.)
The Fiscal Impact Statement prepared by the Office of Financial Management concludes that
the measure would have no fiscal impact on the state and that local school districts may incur
minor, indeterminate costs to update policies and procedures. (Voters' Pamphlet, p. 18.) The
Arguments For and Against, together with their rebuttals, appear at page 19 of the Voters'
1
0
9
0
Pamphlet and are summarized in the recitals of the two attached resolutions.
RCW 29B.45.010 does not authorize the use of City facilities, employees, or publications to
campaign for or against Initiative Measure No. IL26-001 beyond the Council's adoption of a
resolution at the October 27, 2026 open public meeting
BUDGET IMPACTS:
N/A
ITEM HISTORY:
N/A
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Draft Resolution of the City Council of the City of Edmonds, Washington, Supporting
Initiative Measure No. IL26-001
2. Draft Resolution of the City Council of the City of Edmonds, Washington, Opposing
Initiative Measure No. IL26-001
3. Voters Pamphlet 2026 Excerpt - Initiative Measure No. IL26-001
Item 9.3
Packet pg. 499/524
Item 9.3
Packet pg. 499/524
CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON
RESOLUTION NO. ______
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON, SUPPORTING INITIATIVE MEASURE NO. IL26-001.
WHEREAS, Initiative Measure No. IL26-001 will appear on the November 3, 2026 general
election ballot. The ballot title describes it as a measure concerning parental rights in public school
that would repeal recent amendments and re-enact the law as originally passed by Initiative to the
Legislature 2081 (Voters' Pamphlet, p. 15); and
WHEREAS, the Explanatory Statement by the Office of the Attorney General states that
the measure would restore the right of parents to examine classroom materials and would require
school records to be produced within ten business days instead of 45, electronically at no charge
and in paper form for a reasonable fee (Voters' Pamphlet, pp. 17–18); and
WHEREAS, the Explanatory Statement states that the measure would add rights to prior
notification when medical services are offered, notification when a medical service could have a
financial impact on the family, and notification when the school arranges follow-up medical care
beyond school hours (Voters' Pamphlet, p. 17); and
WHEREAS, the Explanatory Statement states that the measure would restore immediate
parental notification when a child is a victim of or involved in a criminal action, or is questioned
by law enforcement, without the current limitation that the event occur on school property during
school hours (Voters' Pamphlet, p. 17); and
WHEREAS, the Argument For urges a Yes vote to "Restore Parents' Rights in Education"
through access to records, notice of medical services, opt-outs, and immediate notification when
law enforcement questions a child or a child is removed from campus (Voters' Pamphlet, p. 19);
and
WHEREAS, the Argument For states that school staff remain mandatory reporters and that
privacy for vulnerable children remains paramount, but that safeguards designed for children at
risk should not become a default policy of withholding information from all parents (Voters'
Pamphlet, p. 19); and
WHEREAS, the Argument For concludes that schools are essential partners in a child's
educational success while parents are responsible for raising their children, and that respecting
these distinct roles is essential to restoring trust (Voters' Pamphlet, p. 19); and
WHEREAS, the Rebuttal of Argument Against notes that the measure expressly provides
that schools shall not be required to release mental health counseling records when a parent is the
target of a child abuse or neglect investigation, and requires immediate notification if a criminal
action is deemed committed against or by the child (Voters' Pamphlet, p. 19); and
Item 9.3
Packet pg. 500/524
Item 9.3
Packet pg. 500/524
2
WHEREAS, the Fiscal Impact Statement by the Office of Financial Management
concludes that the measure would have no fiscal impact on the state and that local school districts
may incur minor, indeterminate costs to update policies (Voters' Pamphlet, p. 18); and
WHEREAS, this Resolution is adopted at the open public meeting of the City Council on
October 27, 2026, the required notice of which included the title and number of Initiative Measure
No. IL26-001, and at which Councilmembers and members of the public were afforded an
approximately equal opportunity to express an opposing view, consistent with RCW
29B.45.010(1);
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Findings. The recitals above are adopted as findings of the City Council and
incorporated by reference.
Section 2. Support. The City Council expresses its collective support for the measure.
Section 3. Yes Vote Urged. The City Council urges the voters of the City of Edmonds to
vote "Yes" on Initiative Measure No. IL26-001 at the November 3, 2026 general election.
ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Edmonds, Washington, at an open public
meeting on October 27, 2026.
CITY OF EDMONDS
By: __________________________________
Mayor Mike Rosen
ATTEST:
__________________________________
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
__________________________________
Office of the City Attorney
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: ______________
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: ______________
RESOLUTION NO.: ______________
Item 9.3
Packet pg. 501/524
Item 9.3
Packet pg. 501/524
CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON
RESOLUTION NO. ______
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON, OPPOSING INITIATIVE MEASURE NO. IL26-001.
WHEREAS, Initiative Measure No. IL26-001 will appear on the November 3, 2026 general
election ballot. The ballot title describes it as a measure concerning parental rights in public school
that would repeal recent amendments and re-enact the law as originally passed by Initiative to the
Legislature 2081 (Voters' Pamphlet, p. 15); and
WHEREAS, the Explanatory Statement by the Office of the Attorney General states that
the measure would remove the current right to immediate notification when a child is alleged to
be the victim, target, or recipient of physical or sexual abuse, sexual misconduct, or assault by a
school employee or contractor (Voters' Pamphlet, p. 17); and
WHEREAS, the Explanatory Statement states that the measure would remove the current
right of parents to file a complaint on behalf of their child relating to harassment, intimidation, and
bullying, and would remove the current statement that nothing in the statute creates a private right
of action (Voters' Pamphlet, p. 18); and
WHEREAS, the Explanatory Statement states that the measure would remove the current
protection against discrimination on the bases of sex, race, religion, sexual orientation, gender
identity, disability, and other bases, replacing it with assurance against discrimination based on the
family's sincerely held religious beliefs (Voters' Pamphlet, p. 18); and
WHEREAS, the Explanatory Statement states that the measure would remove the current
provisions regarding enrollment rights, language access rights, and special education rights
(Voters' Pamphlet, p. 18); and
WHEREAS, the Argument Against urges a No vote to preserve commonsense protections
for child abuse victims, stating that the measure would endanger vulnerable child abuse victims
by requiring schools to hand over sensitive information to parents under criminal investigation for
harming their own child (Voters' Pamphlet, p. 19); and
WHEREAS, the Argument Against states that an unintended consequence of the measure
is ending Washington's requirement that schools immediately notify parents when a crime is
reported, and that experts say delayed notification adds to a child's trauma (Voters' Pamphlet, p.
19); and
WHEREAS, the Argument Against states that the measure discourages students facing
domestic violence, sexual abuse, or bullying from seeking help from trusted teachers and school
counselors, and would put LGBTQ+ students at increased risk of violence and homelessness
(Voters' Pamphlet, p. 19); and
Item 9.3
Packet pg. 502/524
Item 9.3
Packet pg. 502/524
2
WHEREAS, the Rebuttal of Argument For states that the measure would eliminate key
existing parental rights, repeal state laws guaranteeing immediate notification when a child is a
victim of a crime at school, and end commonsense protections for child abuse victims (Voters'
Pamphlet, p. 19); and
WHEREAS, the Fiscal Impact Statement by the Office of Financial Management
concludes that the measure would have no fiscal impact on the state and that local school districts
may incur minor, indeterminate costs to update policies (Voters' Pamphlet, p. 18); and
WHEREAS, this Resolution is adopted at the open public meeting of the City Council on
October 27, 2026, the required notice of which included the title and number of Initiative Measure
No. IL26-001, and at which Councilmembers and members of the public were afforded an
approximately equal opportunity to express an opposing view, consistent with RCW
29B.45.010(1);
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Findings. The recitals above are adopted as findings of the City Council and
incorporated by reference.
Section 2. Opposition. The City Council expresses its collective opposition to the measure.
Section 3. No Vote Urged. The City Council urges the voters of the City of Edmonds to
vote "No" on Initiative Measure No. IL26-001 at the November 3, 2026 general election.
ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Edmonds, Washington, at an open public
meeting on October 27, 2026.
CITY OF EDMONDS
By: __________________________________
Mayor Mike Rosen
ATTEST:
__________________________________
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
__________________________________
Office of the City Attorney
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: ______________
Item 9.3
Packet pg. 503/524
Item 9.3
Packet pg. 503/524
3
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: ______________
RESOLUTION NO.: ______________
Item 9.3
Packet pg. 504/524
Item 9.3
Packet pg. 504/524
15Initiative Measure IL26-001
Initiative Measure No. IL26-001 concerns parental rights relating
to their children in public school.
This measure would repeal amendments to a statute listing
certain rights of parents and guardians of public-school children
and re-enact the law as it was originally enacted by Initiative to
the Legislature 2081.
Should this measure be enacted into law?
[ ] Yes
[ ] No
IL26-001Initiative Measure
Explanatory Statement 16
Fiscal Impact Statement 18
Arguments For and Against 19
The Secretary of State is not responsible
for the content of statements or arguments
(WAC 434-381-180).
A new method of numbering initiatives and
referenda is in effect (WAC 434-379-0071).
Item 9.3
Packet pg. 505/524
Item 9.3
Packet pg. 505/524
16
Explanatory Statement
Written by the Office of the Attorney General
The Law as It Presently Exists
In 2024, the Legislature passed Initiative to the Legislature
2081, which listed certain rights of parents and guardians
of public-school children. Many of those rights were already
set forth elsewhere in state or federal law. In 2025, the
Legislature made several changes to this list of parental
and guardian rights, which again restated many rights that
already existed elsewhere in state and federal law. Currently,
the list of parent and guardian rights is set forth in statute at
RCW 28A.605.005 and provides:
Access to Educational Materials and Records: Parents
and legal guardians have the right to access their child’s
classroom and school-sponsored activities to observe
and to examine textbooks, curriculum, and supplemental
materials used in their child’s classroom in accordance
with policies and procedures. Parents and legal guardians
have the right to review their child’s education records by
submitting a written request. Records must be provided
within a reasonable period of time not to exceed 45 days.
Education records are defined as official records, files,
and data directly related to a student and maintained by
the public school, including records in a child’s cumulative
folder, records of attendance and academic work completed,
records of achievement and evaluative tests, disciplinary
status, test protocols, and individualized education
programs. Education records do not include records that are
kept in the sole possession of the maker, are used only as
a personal memory aid, and are not accessible or revealed
to any other person except a temporary substitute for the
maker of the record. Schools may charge a reasonable fee
for copying education records for parents and guardians
so long as the fee does not prevent a parent or guardian
from accessing the records. Parents and guardians are not
required to appear in person to request education records,
provided the public school can ascertain the identity of the
requestor. Access and disclosure of health care information
is governed by state health-care disclosure laws.
Student Performance and Attendance: Parents and legal
guardians have the right to be informed of their child’s
academic performance, including the child’s performance on
state learning standards tests and assessments. A parent or
legal guardian has the right to request an in-person meeting
with the child’s classroom teacher and principal to discuss
resources or strategies to support and encourage the child’s
academic improvement. Parents and legal guardians also
have the right to be notified of unexcused absences and to
engage in efforts to eliminate or reduce the child’s absences
in accordance with other state law.
Initiative Measure IL26-001
Criminal Action and Law Enforcement: Parents and
legal guardians have the right to receive immediate
notification when a criminal action is alleged to
have been committed against their child on school
property during the school day or during a school
sponsored activity or when their child has been
detained based on probable cause of involvement
in criminal activity on school property during the
school day. Parents and legal guardians also have
the right to receive immediate notification if their
child is subject to custodial interrogation at the
school during the school day, except in cases where
the parent or legal guardian has been accused of
abuse or neglect against the child being questioned.
Public schools must also give notice to parents and
guardians upon receipt of reports that their child
is the alleged victim of physical or sexual abuse,
misconduct, or assault by a school employee or
contractor.
Removal from Campus: Parents and legal guardians
have the right for their child not to be removed
from school grounds or buildings during school
hours without the authorization of a parent or legal
guardian according to other provisions of state
law. Notice to parents provided by youth shelters,
law enforcement agencies, and the Department of
Children, Youth, and Families when they provide
shelter to or take custody of children are governed
by other laws.
Non-Discrimination: Parents and legal guardians
have a right to have their child receive a public
education in a setting that prohibits discrimination
on the basis of sex, race, creed, religion, color,
national origin, honorably discharged veteran
or military status, sexual orientation, gender
expression, gender identity, the presence of any
sensory, mental or physical disability, or the use of a
trained dog guide or service animal by a person with
a disability.
Harassment, Intimidation, and Bullying: Parents and
guardians have the right to file a complaint on behalf
of their child relating to harassment, intimidation,
and bullying, as set forth in other state law.
Notification and Opt Out Rights: Parents and legal
guardians have the right to receive written notice
and to opt their children out of surveys, analyses,
or evaluations that reveal information concerning
categories listed in federal opt-out laws, including
political affiliation or beliefs; mental or psychological
problems of the student or student’s family; sex
behavior and attitudes; illegal, anti-social, self-
Item 9.3
Packet pg. 506/524
Item 9.3
Packet pg. 506/524
17
incriminating, or demeaning behavior; critical appraisals
of people with close relationships to the child or the
child’s family; religious practices, affiliations, or beliefs of
the child or the child’s family; and income. Parents and
legal guardians also have the right to opt their child out
of comprehensive sexual education as required by other
state law.
Enrollment Rights: Parents and legal guardians have a
right to have their child qualify for enrollment in a school
district if they are transferred to, or pending transfer
to, a military installation within the state. Parents and
legal guardians have a right to have their child qualify
without a legal residence for enrollment in a school
district. Parents and legal guardians also have the right
to request enrollment for their child in a nonresident
school district. Parents and legal guardians have a right
to request enrollment for their child in a charter school.
Language Access Rights: Parents and legal guardians
have a right to receive annual notice of the public
school’s language access policies and services and
the parents’ right to free language access services.
Parents and legal guardians also have a right to have
their child whose primary language is not English to
access supplemental instruction and services through a
transitional bilingual instruction program.
Special Education Rights: Parents and legal guardians
have the right to request special education programs
and assistance for their child if their child is eligible for,
but not receiving, special education services, including
due to illness. Parents and legal guardians also have the
right to request an appeal to the superintendent of public
instruction if their child with disabilities has been denied
the opportunity of a special education program by a
school district or public school, and to access special
education due process hearings regarding their child.
School Calendar: Parents and legal guardians have a
right to receive the annual school calendar no later than
30 days prior to the beginning of the school year, and to
be notified of any revisions to the calendar. The calendar
must be posted to the school’s website and must
include student attendance days and events that require
parent or student attendance outside of normal school
days or hours.
Required Fees: Parents and legal guardians have a right
to be informed of required fees and their purpose and
use, and how economic hardships may be addressed.
Dress Code or Uniform: Parents and legal guardians
have a right to be informed of a description of any
required dress code or uniform.
Private Right of Action: Nothing in the statute setting
forth rights of parents and legal guardians creates a
private right of action.
The Effect of the Proposed Measure if Approved
If approved, the proposed measure would undo all of the
changes made by the 2025 Legislature, and re-institute
the list of rights as enacted in 2024 by Initiative to the
Legislature 2081. Specifically, the proposal would modify
current law in the following ways:
Access to Educational Materials and Records: Parents
and legal guardians would have a right to examine the
textbooks, curriculum, and supplemental material used
in their child’s classroom. The limitation that parental
and guardian access is according to the provisions of
other law and in conformity with school policies would
be removed. With respect to records, schools would
be prohibited from requiring that parents appear in
person to make a records request. The exception for
cases where the school could not verify the identity of
the parent or guardian would be eliminated. Schools
would be prohibited from charging for electronic copies,
and could charge a reasonable fee for copies of paper
records. Records would have to be produced within ten
business days instead of the 45 days allowed by current
law. The kinds of records that schools would be required
to produce would be broadened to include any student-
specific files, documents, or other materials that are
maintained by the school. The exception for documents
kept in the sole possession of the maker would be
eliminated. The provision specifying that health care
records are controlled by separate laws about disclosure
of health care records would be eliminated.
Medical Services and Treatment: The measure would
add that parents and legal guardians have a right to
receive prior notification when medical services are
being offered to their child (except emergency medical
treatment), to receive notification when any medical
service has been provided to their child that could result
in financial impact to the parent or legal guardian, and
to receive notification when the school has arranged for
medical treatment that results in follow-up care beyond
normal school hours.
Criminal Action and Law Enforcement: The specification
that parents and guardians are only entitled to notice
from public schools when the crime or law enforcement
engagement occurs on school property and during
school hours would be removed. The right to receive
immediate notification when a child is alleged to be the
victim, target, or recipient of physical or sexual abuse,
sexual misconduct, or assault by a school employee or
contractor would be removed.
Initiative Measure IL26-001
Item 9.3
Packet pg. 507/524
Item 9.3
Packet pg. 507/524
18
Removal from Campus: The provision specifying
that parental and legal guardian notification by youth
shelters, law enforcement, and the Department of
Children, Youth, and Families is governed by other laws
would be removed. Public schools would be required to
notify parents if a child is taken or removed from a public
school without parental permission, including to stay at a
youth shelter.
Non-Discrimination: The provision specifying that
parents and legal guardians have a right to have their
child receive an education in a setting that prohibits
discrimination on a number of bases would be removed.
The measure would instead state a right of parents and
legal guardians to receive assurance that their child’s
public school will not discriminate against their child
based upon the sincerely held religious beliefs of the
child’s family.
Notification and Opt Out: Parents and legal guardians
would continue to have the right from federal law to
receive written notice and to opt their children out of
surveys, analyses, or evaluations that reveal information
concerning political affiliation or beliefs; mental or
psychological problems of the student or student’s
family; sex behavior and attitudes; illegal, anti-social,
self-incriminating, or demeaning behavior; critical
appraisals of people with close relationships to the child
or the child’s family; religious practices, affiliations, or
beliefs of the child or the child’s family; and income. The
measure would add to the list of topics for which parents
and legal guardians have the right to receive notice and
opt-out the child’s sexual experiences or attractions,
the child’s family beliefs, morality, or religion, or political
affiliations; and any mental health or psychological
problems of the child or a family member.
The right to opt a child out of comprehensive sexual
education would be rewritten to state a right to receive
written notice and the option to opt a child out of
instruction on topics associated with sexual activity in
accordance with state law.
Other Provisions Removed: The right of a parent or
legal guardian to file a complaint on behalf of their child
relating to harassment, intimidation, and bullying, as
set forth in other state law, would be removed. The
statement that nothing in the statute setting forth rights
of parents and legal guardians creates a private right
of action would be removed. The provisions regarding
enrollment rights, language access rights, and special
education rights would be removed.
Calendar, Fees, and Dress Code: No changes would be
made to the provisions regarding the school calendar,
required fees, or the dress code or uniform.
Fiscal Impact Statement
Written by the Office of Financial Management
For more information visit www ofm wa gov/ballot
Initiative Measure IL26-001
Summary
If approved by voters, Initiative Measure No. IL26-001
would restore RCW 28A.605.005 as originally passed
by the Legislature in the 2024 session. It would list
certain rights of parents and guardians of public-school
children, such as the right to review their child’s school
records, receive notifications, and opt their child out of
certain activities. It would repeal amendments made in
the 2025 legislative session. The initiative would have
no fiscal impact on the state. Local school districts may
incur minor costs to update policies and procedures, but
this fiscal impact is indeterminate.
General assumptions
• The effective date of the initiative is December 3,
2026.
• The provisions of the initiative apply prospectively,
not retroactively.
Revenue
The initiative would not impact state or local revenue.
Expenditures
The initiative would have no fiscal impact on state
government. Local school districts could incur minor
costs to update policies and procedures, but this fiscal
impact is indeterminate.
Item 9.3
Packet pg. 508/524
Item 9.3
Packet pg. 508/524
19
Argument for Argument against
Rebuttal of argument against
Don’t be misled. IL26-001 expressly states that schools
“shall not be required to release” mental health counseling
records when a parent is the target of a child abuse or
neglect investigation; requires “immediate notification” if a
criminal action is deemed committed against or by their child;
and contains zero mandates placing students in danger. The
measure preserves safeguards while ensuring parents receive
consequential information about their children. Vote yes.
Written by
Travis Reep, Public School Elementary Teacher, Elected
Union Representative; Alesha Perkins, Parent and Education
Advocate, Independent Writer; Peter Rosenkranz, M.Ed.,
Superintendent, La Center School District; Tony Harris,
Public School Science/STEM Teacher, Elected Union
Representative; Amy Sousa, M.A. in Depth Psychology,
Women’s Rights Advocate; Jess Grant, Member, Democrats
for an Informed Approach to Gender
Contact: YESonParentsRights@gmail.com
Rebuttal of argument for
IL26-001, bankrolled by ultra-conservative interests, is so
poorly written it would eliminate key existing parental rights.
It will repeal current state laws that guarantee parents’ rights
to immediate notification if their child is a victim of a crime
at school. It ends commonsense protections for child abuse
victims whose parents are accused of child abuse and
rape. That’s why it’s opposed by the WA Coalition Against
Domestic Violence and Sexual Assault. Vote No.
Vote Yes to Restore Parents’ Rights in Education
These rights include access to their child’s instructional
materials and student records, notice of medical services,
opt-outs from certain activities and instruction, and
immediate notification when law enforcement questions their
child or their child is removed from campus without parental
permission.
Protecting Vulnerable Children
School staff remain mandatory reporters of suspected
child abuse or neglect. Privacy for vulnerable children
remains paramount. But safeguards designed for children
at risk should not become a default policy of withholding
information from all parents.
Support Families, Not Secrecy
Parents must give permission for schools to administer
medication, apply sunscreen, or take students on field
trips. Yet current policies allow schools to withhold critical
information when a child expresses a new gender identity
at school. These policies may require staff to conceal this
information from parents, even when doing so conflicts with
their conscience or professional judgment. Opponents call
sharing this information with parents “outing” even when
significant changes to a minor’s school life may already
be known to classmates, teachers, and staff. Deliberately
excluding parents treats them as inherently unsafe without
an individualized assessment. This undermines the vital
parent-child relationship and denies families the opportunity
to navigate consequential questions about health and well-
being together.
Restore Trust in Washington Schools
Schools are essential partners in a child’s educational
success, while parents are responsible for raising their
children. Respecting these distinct roles is essential to
restoring trust. Vote yes.
Vote No On Removing Commonsense Protections For
Child Abuse Victims
While most parents are loving, the sad reality is there were
117,000 reports of child abuse or neglect in WA in 2024
alone. This poorly written measure further endangers
vulnerable child abuse victims by requiring schools to
hand over sensitive information to parents under criminal
investigation for raping, abusing or otherwise harming their
own child. That’s why it’s opposed by law enforcement and
the WA Coalition Against Domestic Violence and Sexual
Assault.
Vote No On Delaying Parental Notification When Children
Are Crime Victims
If a student is the victim of a serious crime at school,
parents should not have to wait to find out. An unintended
consequence of IL26-001 is ending Washington’s legal
requirement that schools immediately notify parents when
the crime is reported. Experts say delayed notification only
adds to the child’s trauma and can prevent a child from
getting immediate help and support from loved ones and
professionals.
Vote No On Worsening The Teen Mental Health And
Homelessness Crisis
School nurses and counselors say this measure, bankrolled
by ultra-conservatives, discourages students facing domestic
violence, sexual abuse, or bullying from seeking help from
trusted teachers and school counselors, who would be
required to release students’ confidential records. It also
forces schools to knowingly put LGBTQ+ kids in increased
danger of violence and homelessness by outing them to
potentially abusive families.That’s why the WA State Nurses
Association, doctors, and school counselors oppose this
measure.
Written by
John Lovick, State Senator, Democrat, former Snohomish
County Sheriff; Roshelle Cleland, Washington Coalition
Against Domestic Violence and Sexual Assault; Justin Gill,
APRN, President, Washington State Nurses Association;
Karen Crowley, President, League of Women Voters of
Washington; Courtney Normand, Washington State Director,
Planned Parenthood Alliance Advocates; Jaime Fineman-
McKinney, Nationally Board Certified School Counselor, Fife
Contact: NoHateInWAState.org/About-I-001;
info@nohateinwastate.org
Initiative Measure IL26-001
Item 9.3
Packet pg. 509/524
Item 9.3
Packet pg. 509/524
1
0
9
1
Agenda Item 9.4
Edmonds City Council
Regular Meeting
October 27, 2026
TITLE:Public Hearing: Resolution expressing the Edmonds City Council's
position on Initiative Measure No. IL26-638 concerning
participation in athletics at K-12 schools. (First Reading)
DEPARTMENT:City Council Office
PRESENTER:Council President Michelle Dotsch
NEEDED FROM COUNCIL:Informational
RECOMMENDATION: Council may adopt a resolution of support, a resolution of
opposition, or to take no action.
BUDGET:
Total Dollar Amount:0 ☐ Approved in Budget
Fund(s):N/A ☐ Budget Reallocation Required
☒ No Budget Impact
PROBLEM/ISSUE STATEMENT:
Initiative Measure No. IL26-638 will appear on the November 3, 2026 general election ballot.
According to the ballot title published in the Washington State Voters' Pamphlet, the measure
"concerns participation in athletics at K-12 schools," would prohibit students the measure
defines as "biologically male" from competing in certain school athletic activities intended for
female students only, and would require verification of biological sex by students' healthcare
providers. (Voters' Pamphlet, p. 20.)
CONTEXT, ANALYSIS, & ALTERNATIVES:
The Explanatory Statement written by the Office of the Attorney General summarizes current
law, under which Washington public schools may provide separate athletic teams based on sex
and the Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction has adopted regulations prohibiting
discrimination based on sex and gender identity. If approved, the measure would prohibit
biologically male students from competing with and against female students on sports teams or
in individual events designated for female students only, in public K-12 schools and in private
schools participating in the Washington Interscholastic Activities Association or similar
nonprofit organizations. Students wishing to participate in interschool sports designated for
female students only would provide a form, signed by their personal healthcare provider,
verifying biological sex based on reproductive anatomy, genetic makeup, or normal
endogenously produced testosterone levels. (Voters' Pamphlet, p. 21.)
The Fiscal Impact Statement prepared by the Office of Financial Management concludes that
the measure would not impact state or local revenue, that the Office of the Superintendent of
Public Instruction would incur a one-time cost of approximately $21,000 to update guidelines,
and that local school districts may incur indeterminate additional costs to revise policies and
Item 9.4
Packet pg. 510/524
Item 9.4
Packet pg. 510/524
1
0
9
1
procedures. (Voters' Pamphlet, p. 21.) The Arguments For and Against, together with their
rebuttals, appear at page 22 of the Voters' Pamphlet and are summarized in the recitals of the
two attached resolutions.
BUDGET IMPACTS:
N/A
ITEM HISTORY:
N/A
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Resolution of the City Council of the City of Edmonds, Washington, Supporting Initiative
Measure No. IL26-638.
2. Resolution of the City Council of the City of Edmonds, Washington, Opposing Initiative
Measure No. IL26-638.
3. Voters’ Pamphlet 2026 Excerpt - Initiative Measure No. IL26-638
Item 9.4
Packet pg. 511/524
Item 9.4
Packet pg. 511/524
CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON
RESOLUTION NO. ______
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON, SUPPORTING INITIATIVE MEASURE NO. IL26-638.
WHEREAS, Initiative Measure No. IL26-638 will appear on the November 3, 2026 general
election ballot. The ballot title describes it as a measure concerning participation in athletics at K-
12 schools that would prohibit students it defines as "biologically male" from competing in certain
school athletic activities intended for female students only, and would require verification of
biological sex by students' healthcare providers (Voters' Pamphlet, p. 20); and
WHEREAS, the Explanatory Statement by the Office of the Attorney General states that
under current law, Washington public schools may provide separate athletic teams based on sex,
and that the Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction has adopted regulations prohibiting
discrimination based on sex and gender identity (Voters' Pamphlet, p. 21); and
WHEREAS, the Explanatory Statement states that, if approved, the measure would
prohibit biologically male students from competing with and against female students on sports
teams or in individual events designated for female students only, in public K-12 schools and in
private schools that participate in the WIAA or similar nonprofit organizations (Voters' Pamphlet,
p. 21); and
WHEREAS, the Explanatory Statement states that students wishing to participate in
interschool sports designated for female students only would provide a form, signed by the
student's personal healthcare provider, that verifies the student's biological sex based on
reproductive anatomy, genetic makeup, or normal endogenously produced testosterone levels
(Voters' Pamphlet, p. 21); and
WHEREAS, the Argument For urges a Yes vote to protect fairness in girls' sports, stating
that female athletes deserve fair opportunities and that the measure would affirm the rights
established through Title IX (Voters' Pamphlet, p. 22); and
WHEREAS, the Argument For states that approving the measure would align Washington
with policies adopted by federal law, the Women's Tennis Association, World Athletics, and the
International Olympic Committee to protect eligibility for the female category (Voters' Pamphlet,
p. 22); and
WHEREAS, the Argument For states that medical clearance is already required to
participate safely, and that sex would be verified during routine primary care by a licensed medical
professional based on birth records, medical history, and a standard, non-invasive physical
examination (Voters' Pamphlet, p. 22); and
WHEREAS, the Rebuttal of Argument Against states that the measure does not require
invasive or expensive exams and does not ban anyone from sports, and that Washington
competition results document at least 269 placements by male athletes in girls' interscholastic
categories, including 74 first-place and 156 top-three finishes (Voters' Pamphlet, p. 22); and
Item 9.4
Packet pg. 512/524
Item 9.4
Packet pg. 512/524
2
WHEREAS, the Fiscal Impact Statement by the Office of Financial Management
concludes that the measure would not impact state or local revenue, that the Office of the
Superintendent of Public Instruction would incur a one-time cost of approximately $21,000 to
update guidelines, and that local school districts may incur indeterminate additional costs (Voters'
Pamphlet, p. 21); and
WHEREAS, this Resolution is adopted at the open public meeting of the City Council on
October 27, 2026, the required notice of which included the title and number of Initiative Measure
No. IL26-638, and at which Councilmembers and members of the public were afforded an
approximately equal opportunity to express an opposing view, consistent with RCW
29B.45.010(1);
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Findings. The recitals above are adopted as findings of the City Council and
incorporated by reference.
Section 2. Support. The City Council expresses its collective support for the measure.
Section 3. Yes Vote Urged. The City Council urges the voters of the City of Edmonds to
vote "Yes" on Initiative Measure No. IL26-638 at the November 3, 2026 general election.
ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Edmonds, Washington, at an open public
meeting on October 27, 2026.
CITY OF EDMONDS
By: __________________________________
Mayor Mike Rosen
ATTEST:
__________________________________
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
__________________________________
Office of the City Attorney
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: ______________
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: ______________
Item 9.4
Packet pg. 513/524
Item 9.4
Packet pg. 513/524
3
RESOLUTION NO.: ______________
Office of the City Attorney
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: ______________
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: ______________
RESOLUTION NO.: ______________
Item 9.4
Packet pg. 514/524
Item 9.4
Packet pg. 514/524
CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON
RESOLUTION NO. ______
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON, OPPOSING INITIATIVE MEASURE NO. IL26-638.
WHEREAS, Initiative Measure No. IL26-638 will appear on the November 3, 2026 general
election ballot. The ballot title describes it as a measure concerning participation in athletics at K-
12 schools that would prohibit students it defines as "biologically male" from competing in certain
school athletic activities intended for female students only, and would require verification of
biological sex by students' healthcare providers (Voters' Pamphlet, p. 20); and
WHEREAS, the Explanatory Statement by the Office of the Attorney General states that,
if approved, the measure would generally prevent transgender girls from participating on girls'
sports teams, and would apply to public K-12 schools and to private schools participating in the
WIAA or similar nonprofit organizations (Voters' Pamphlet, p. 21); and
WHEREAS, the Explanatory Statement states that students who wish to participate in
interschool sports designated for female students only would be required to undergo some type of
medical evaluation of their sex and to provide a form, signed by the student's personal healthcare
provider, verifying biological sex based on reproductive anatomy, genetic makeup, or normal
endogenously produced testosterone levels (Voters' Pamphlet, p. 21); and
WHEREAS, the Argument Against urges a No vote to protect all girls, stating that the
measure would require girls as young as eight to undergo intrusive medical sex certification, that
it bars parents from using birth certificates, and that its verification requirements apply to girls
only (Voters' Pamphlet, p. 22); and
WHEREAS, the Argument Against states that the measure is the most extreme proposal of
its kind in the United States and that it would play politics with children and put girls at risk
(Voters' Pamphlet, p. 22); and
WHEREAS, the Argument Against states that nurses, doctors, and reproductive-health
advocates warn that the measure would subject girls to medically unnecessary and potentially
harmful genital examinations, and that many of Washington's approximately 147,500 girls without
a regular family doctor could be subjected to such examinations by strangers (Voters' Pamphlet,
p. 22); and
WHEREAS, the Argument Against states that the measure would discourage girls from
playing sports, imposing a statewide blanket ban to exclude a very small number of transgender
girls that would negatively impact all girls and leave no room for case-by-case decisions (Voters'
Pamphlet, p. 22); and
Item 9.4
Packet pg. 515/524
Item 9.4
Packet pg. 515/524
2
WHEREAS, the Rebuttal of Argument For states that the measure is opposed by
pediatricians, nurses, parents, and sexual assault prevention groups, that students today remain
fully clothed during sports physicals, that doctors warn the measure would subject girls to new
invasive genital examinations, and that the measure exempts boys and bars parents from using
birth certificates (Voters' Pamphlet, p. 22); and
WHEREAS, the Fiscal Impact Statement by the Office of Financial Management
concludes that the measure would not impact state or local revenue, that the Office of the
Superintendent of Public Instruction would incur a one-time cost of approximately $21,000 to
update guidelines, and that local school districts may incur indeterminate additional costs (Voters'
Pamphlet, p. 21); and
WHEREAS, this Resolution is adopted at the open public meeting of the City Council on
October 27, 2026, the required notice of which included the title and number of Initiative Measure
No. IL26-638, and at which Councilmembers and members of the public were afforded an
approximately equal opportunity to express an opposing view, consistent with RCW
29B.45.010(1);
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Findings. The recitals above are adopted as findings of the City Council and
incorporated by reference.
Section 2. Opposition. The City Council expresses its collective opposition to the measure.
Section 3. No Vote Urged. The City Council urges the voters of the City of Edmonds to
vote "No" on Initiative Measure No. IL26-638 at the November 3, 2026 general election.
ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Edmonds, Washington, at an open public
meeting on October 27, 2026.
CITY OF EDMONDS
By: __________________________________
Mayor Mike Rosen
ATTEST:
__________________________________
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
__________________________________
Item 9.4
Packet pg. 516/524
Item 9.4
Packet pg. 516/524
3
Office of the City Attorney
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: ______________
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: ______________
RESOLUTION NO.: ______________
Item 9.4
Packet pg. 517/524
Item 9.4
Packet pg. 517/524
20
Explanatory Statement 21
Fiscal Impact Statement 21
Arguments For and Against 22
Initiative Measure IL26-638
Initiative Measure No. IL26-638 concerns participation in athletics
at K-12 schools.
This measure would prohibit students it defines as “biologically
male” from competing in certain school athletic activities intended
for female students only. It would require verification of biological
sex by students’ healthcare providers.
Should this measure be enacted into law?
[ ] Yes
[ ] No
IL26-638Initiative Measure
The Secretary of State is not responsible
for the content of statements or arguments
(WAC 434-381-180).
A new method of numbering initiatives and
referenda is in effect (WAC 434-379-0071).
Item 9.4
Packet pg. 518/524
Item 9.4
Packet pg. 518/524
21
Explanatory Statement
Written by the Office of the Attorney General
The Law as It Presently Exists
In Washington, school districts may offer extracurricular
sports opportunities for students. Those sports must be
offered to all public school students without regard to
sex, but public schools may provide separate athletic
teams based on sex. The Office of the Superintendent of
Public Instruction also creates regulations and guidelines
to eliminate discrimination in sports for students, and
these regulations prohibit discrimination based on sex
and gender identity.
Public and private K-12 schools in Washington may
allow individual athletes and teams to compete
against athletes and teams from other schools. For
public schools, a school district’s board of directors
is responsible for regulating these athletic activities
but may delegate that responsibility to a nonprofit
organization, such as the Washington Interscholastic
Activities Association (WIAA). A nonprofit organization
that regulates interschool sports may not discriminate on
the basis of sex and must have written rules and policies
regarding student participation.
The Effect of the Proposed Measure if Approved
If approved, this initiative would change participation
rules for interschool sports. This initiative would, in
its own language, prohibit “biologically male students
from competing with and against female students” on
sports teams or in individual events that are designated
for female students only. This would generally prevent
transgender girls from participating on girls’ sports
teams. This prohibition would affect public K-12 schools
and also private schools that participate in the WIAA or
similar nonprofit organizations.
Students who want to participate in interschool sports
teams or individual events that are designated for female
students only would have to provide a form that verifies
the student’s “biological sex.” That form must be signed
by the student’s personal health care provider. The
verification would have to be based on the student’s
reproductive anatomy, genetic makeup, or normal
endogenously produced testosterone levels. Students
would thus have to undergo some type of medical
evaluation of their sex to participate in interschool sports
designated for female students only.
Initiative Measure IL26-638
Fiscal Impact Statement
Written by the Office of Financial Management
For more information visit www ofm wa gov/ballot
Summary
If approved by voters, Initiative Measure No. IL26-638
would prohibit students it defines as “biologically male”
from competing in certain school athletic activities
intended for female students only. It requires verification
of biological sex by students’ healthcare providers. The
Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction would
incur minor costs to update current guidance. Local
school districts may also incur costs to revise existing
policies, procedures, rules, and other requirements, but
this fiscal impact is indeterminate.
General assumptions
• The effective date of the initiative is December 3,
2026.
• The provisions of the initiative apply prospectively,
not retroactively.
• The estimates use the state’s fiscal year (SFY) of
July 1 through June 30. State fiscal year 2026 is
July 1, 2025, through June 30, 2026.
Revenue
The initiative would not impact state or local revenue.
Expenditures
The Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction
would incur a one-time cost of approximately $21,000
in SFY 2026 to update existing guidelines to align with
the initiative’s requirements. Local school districts
would likely also incur costs to revise existing policies,
procedures, rules, and other requirements, but this fiscal
impact is indeterminate.
Item 9.4
Packet pg. 519/524
Item 9.4
Packet pg. 519/524
22
Argument for Argument against
Rebuttal of argument against
Don’t be misled by the opposition. IL26-638 doesn’t require
invasive or expensive exams. Standard primary pediatric
care already verifies sex; transferring that record to sports
is sufficient. Male athletic advantage is well established.
Washington competition results document at least 269
placements by male athletes competing in girls’ interscholastic
categories, including 74 firsts and 156 top-three finishes. The
initiative doesn’t ban anyone from sports. It simply requires
participation consistent with one’s sex. Vote yes.
Rebuttal of argument for
Vote yes to protect fairness in girls’ sports
Female athletes deserve fair opportunities to build
confidence, develop skills, and pursue goals. Let’s protect
those opportunities and affirm the hard-fought rights
established through Title IX in 1972, which expanded athletic
access for women by recognizing the necessity of the female
category. Washington currently allows males to compete
against girls, undermining opportunities generations before
them fought to secure.
Approving IL26-638 would align Washington with world
sports policies
Federal law, the Women’s Tennis Association, World
Athletics, and the International Olympic Committee have all
adopted policies to protect eligibility for the female category.
In March 2026, the IOC president stated, “It is absolutely
clear that it would not be fair for biological males to compete
in the female category.”
Voting yes gives all students the opportunity to
participate in interscholastic sports
Medical clearance is already required to participate safely.
Students would compete in the category that aligns with
their sex, verified during routine, medically necessary primary
care recommended by the American Academy of Pediatrics.
During a private, consented visit, a licensed medical
professional would verify sex based on the student’s birth
records, medical history and/or a standard, non-invasive
physical examination.
Washington can respect every student while recognizing
that sex-based athletic categories are necessary
A female athlete should not lose a starting position, medal,
championship, or college recruiting opportunity because the
category created for her was not protected.
Vote No To Protect All Girls
We all want fairness and safety in sports, but this poorly
written measure would require girls as young as 8 to undergo
intrusive medical sex certification as a new part of sports
physicals. It bans parents from using birth certificates.
Section 2 says doctors must subject girls to invasive
examinations of their “reproductive organs,” or expensive
genetic or hormone tests. These requirements apply to girls
only, boys are exempt.
Vote No Because It’s the Most Extreme Proposal of Its
Kind In The U S
This initiative is bankrolled by an ultra-conservative mega-
donor to distract from rising costs, foster hate, and divide our
communities. It’s playing politics with kids, and putting girls
at risk.
Vote No Because Doctors and Nurses Warn It Requires
Invasive Genital Exams On Girls
The WA State Nurses Association, Planned Parenthood
Alliance Advocates, and doctors warn this measure would
subject girls to medically unnecessary, embarrassing, and
potentially harmful genital exams. Today, students remain
fully clothed during sports physicals. Many of Washington’s
147,500 girls without a regular family doctor would be
subject to genital examinations by total strangers.
Vote No Because It Discourages Girls From Playing
Sports
Coaches and athletes say if we truly cared about girls’ sports
we would not put up more barriers for girls like invasive
genital exam requirements. This statewide blanket ban to
kick 5 - 10 trans girls off school teams will negatively impact
all girls, leaving no room for case by case decisions.
Written by
Alesha Perkins, Parent and Education Advocate,
Independent Writer; Dori Whitford, High School Coach,
Track and Cross Country; Carol Brown, Olympic Bronze
Medalist, Rowing Board Member, ICONS; Erica Li, MD,
Board-Certified Pediatrician; Ahnaleigh Wilson, Student
Athlete, Girls’ Sports Advocate; Jess Grant, Member,
Democrats for an Informed Approach to Gender
Contact: diagwash@gmail.com; www.di-ag.org
Written by
Justin Gill, APRN, President, WA State Nurses Association;
Courtney Normand, WA State Director, Planned Parenthood
Alliance Advocates; Karen Crowley, President, League
of Women Voters of WA; Grace Shih, M.D., Family
Physician; Katie Johnson, RN, Retired School Nurse; Paul
Charbonneau, High School Girls’ Wrestling Coach
Contact: NoHateInWAState.org/About-I-638;
info@nohateinwastate.org
Initiative Measure IL26-638
IL26-638 is opposed by pediatricians, nurses, parents, and
sexual assault prevention groups because it discriminates
against girls and puts them at risk of harm. Today girls
in elementary, middle, and high school remain fully
clothed during sports physicals. Doctors say this poorly
written measure will subject girls to new invasive genital
examinations. This measure - the most extreme in the
nation - exempts boys, and bans parents from using birth
certificates. Vote No to protect girls.
Item 9.4
Packet pg. 520/524
Item 9.4
Packet pg. 520/524
1
0
9
2
Agenda Item 10.1
Edmonds City Council
Regular Meeting
October 27, 2026
TITLE:Resolution expressing the Edmonds City Council's position on
Initiative Measure No. IL26-001 concerning parental rights
relating to their children in public school (Second Reading)
DEPARTMENT:City Council Office
PRESENTER:Council President Michelle Dotsch
NEEDED FROM COUNCIL:Action
RECOMMENDATION:Council may adopt a resolution of support, a resolution of
opposition, or to take no action.
BUDGET:
Total Dollar Amount:N/A ☐ Approved in Budget
Fund(s):N/A ☐ Budget Reallocation Required
☒ No Budget Impact
PROBLEM/ISSUE STATEMENT:
Initiative Measure No. IL26-001 will appear on the November 3, 2026 general election ballot.
According to the ballot title published in the Washington State Voters' Pamphlet, the measure
"concerns parental rights relating to their children in public school" and "would repeal
amendments to a statute listing certain rights of parents and guardians of public-school
children and re-enact the law as it was originally enacted by Initiative to the Legislature 2081."
(Voters' Pamphlet, p. 15.)
CONTEXT, ANALYSIS, & ALTERNATIVES:
The Explanatory Statement written by the Office of the Attorney General summarizes current
law, under which the Legislature in 2024 enacted a statute listing certain rights of parents and
legal guardians of public-school children, which was amended in 2025. If approved, the
measure would repeal the 2025 amendments and re-enact the statute as it existed following its
original enactment, modifying certain existing rights (including the time for providing school
records and the circumstances for notifying parents of law-enforcement contact with their
child) and removing certain other provisions (including a current right to immediate notification
of alleged abuse by a school employee or contractor, the current right to file a complaint
relating to harassment, intimidation, and bullying, the current non-discrimination provision,
and provisions regarding enrollment, language access, and special education rights). (Voters'
Pamphlet, pp. 17–18.)
The Fiscal Impact Statement prepared by the Office of Financial Management concludes that
the measure would have no fiscal impact on the state and that local school districts may incur
minor, indeterminate costs to update policies and procedures. (Voters' Pamphlet, p. 18.) The
Arguments For and Against, together with their rebuttals, appear at page 19 of the Voters'
Item 10.1
Packet pg. 521/524
Item 10.1
Packet pg. 521/524
1
0
9
2
Pamphlet and are summarized in the recitals of the two attached resolutions.
RCW 29B.45.010 does not authorize the use of City facilities, employees, or publications to
campaign for or against Initiative Measure No. IL26-001 beyond the Council's adoption of a
resolution at the October 27, 2026 open public meeting
BUDGET IMPACTS:
None
ITEM HISTORY:
October 27, 2026 – Public Hearing: Resolution expressing the Edmonds City Council's position
on Initiative Measure No. IL26-001 concerning
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
ATTACHMENTS:
Please reference council agenda item 9.3 “Public Hearing: Resolution expressing the Edmonds
City Council's position on Initiative Measure No. IL26-001 concerning parental rights relating to
their children in public school” for attachments.
Item 10.1
Packet pg. 522/524
Item 10.1
Packet pg. 522/524
1
0
9
3
Agenda Item 10.2
Edmonds City Council
Regular Meeting
October 27, 2026
TITLE:Resolution expressing the Edmonds City Council's position on
Initiative Measure No. IL26-638 concerning participation in
athletics at K-12 schools (Second Reading)
DEPARTMENT:City Council Office
PRESENTER:Council President Michelle Dotsch
NEEDED FROM COUNCIL:Action
RECOMMENDATION:Council may adopt a resolution of support, a resolution of
opposition, or to take no action.
BUDGET:
Total Dollar Amount:N/A ☐ Approved in Budget
Fund(s):N/A ☐ Budget Reallocation Required
☒ No Budget Impact
PROBLEM/ISSUE STATEMENT:
Initiative Measure No. IL26-638 will appear on the November 3, 2026 general election ballot.
According to the ballot title published in the Washington State Voters' Pamphlet, the measure
"concerns participation in athletics at K-12 schools," would prohibit students the measure
defines as "biologically male" from competing in certain school athletic activities intended for
female students only, and would require verification of biological sex by students' healthcare
providers. (Voters' Pamphlet, p. 20.)
CONTEXT, ANALYSIS, & ALTERNATIVES:
The Explanatory Statement written by the Office of the Attorney General summarizes current
law, under which Washington public schools may provide separate athletic teams based on sex
and the Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction has adopted regulations prohibiting
discrimination based on sex and gender identity. If approved, the measure would prohibit
biologically male students from competing with and against female students on sports teams or
in individual events designated for female students only, in public K-12 schools and in private
schools participating in the Washington Interscholastic Activities Association or similar
nonprofit organizations. Students wishing to participate in interschool sports designated for
female students only would provide a form, signed by their personal healthcare provider,
verifying biological sex based on reproductive anatomy, genetic makeup, or normal
endogenously produced testosterone levels. (Voters' Pamphlet, p. 21.)
The Fiscal Impact Statement prepared by the Office of Financial Management concludes that
the measure would not impact state or local revenue, that the Office of the Superintendent of
Public Instruction would incur a one-time cost of approximately $21,000 to update guidelines,
and that local school districts may incur indeterminate additional costs to revise policies and
Item 10.2
Packet pg. 523/524
Item 10.2
Packet pg. 523/524
procedures. (Voters' Pamphlet, p. 21.) The Arguments For and Against, together with their
rebuttals, appear at page 22 of the Voters' Pamphlet and are summarized in the recitals of the
two attached resolutions.
BUDGET IMPACTS:
None
ITEM HISTORY:
October 27, 2026 – a Public Hearing: Resolution expressing the Edmonds City Council’s position
on Initiative Measure No. IL26-638 concerning participation in athletics at K-12 schools.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
ATTACHMENTS:
Please reference council agenda item 9.4 “Public Hearing: Resolution expressing the Edmonds
City Council's position on Initiative Measure No. IL26-638 participation in athletics at K-12
schools” for attachments.