Loading...
10/16/2001 City CouncilEDMONDS CITY COUNCIL APPROVED MINUTES October 16, 2001 Following a Special Meeting at 6:45 p.m. for an Executive Session regarding a real estate matter, the Edmonds City Council meeting was called to order at 7:09 p.m. by Mayor Haakenson in the Council Chambers, 250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds. The meeting was opened with the flag salute. ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT Gary Haakenson, Mayor Dave Earling, Council President Thomas A. Miller, Councilmember Michael Plunkett, Councilmember Lora Petso, Councilmember Dave Orvis, Councilmember Richard Marin, Councilmember ALSO PRESENT Meredith Storey, Student Representative 1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA STAFF PRESENT Greg Wean, Acting Police Chief Duane Bowman, Development Serv. Director Stephen Clifton, Community Services Director Noel Miller, Public Works Director Jim Larson, Assistant Admin. Serv. Director Rob Chave, Planning Manager Dave Gebert, City Engineer Don Fiene, Assistant City Engineer Darrell Smith, Traffic Engineer Steve Bullock, Senior Planner Scott Snyder, City Attorney Sandy Chase, City Clerk Jana Spellman, Senior Executive Council Asst. Jeannie Dines, Recorder COUNCILMEMBER MARIN MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER ORVIS, FOR APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 2. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS Councilmember Petso requested Item I be removed from the Consent Agenda. COUNCILMEMBER MARIN MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER ORVIS, FOR APPROVAL OF THE CONSENT AGENDA AS AMENDED. The agenda items approved are as follows: (A) ROLL CALL Approve /25/01 (B) APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 Minutes (C) APPROVAL OF CLAIM CHECKS #50830 THROUGH #50986 FOR THE WEEK OF Approve SEPTEMBER 24, 2001, IN THE AMOUNT OF $332,281.91. APPROVAL OF CLAIM Claim CHECKS #50987 THROUGH #51177 FOR THE WEEK OF OCTOBER 1, 2001, IN THE Checks AMOUNT OF $174,252.97. APPROVAL OF CLAIM CHECKS #51178 THROUGH #51343 FOR THE WEEK OF OCTOBER 8, 2001, IN THE AMOUNT OF $214,859.96. APPROVAL OF PAYROLL DIRECT DEPOSITS AND CHECKS #3273 THROUGH #3370 FOR THE PERIOD SEPTEMBER 16 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 30, 2001, IN THE AMOUNT OF $689,200.86. Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes October 16, 2001 Page 1 I 1 I 'm for (D) ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT OF CLAIM FOR DAMAGES FROM DON AND ODESSA V ANNAND ($1,000) (E) REPORT ON THE GENERAL FUND AND OTHER SELECTED FUNDS FINANCIAL POSITION FOR THE MONTH ENDING AUGUST 2001 dmiral Wy Sanitary (F) REPORT ON BIDS OPENED OCTOBER 3, 2001, FOR THE ADMIRAL WAY Sewer SANITARY SEWER REHABILITATION PROJECT, AND AWARD OF CONTRACT TO Project INSITUFORM TECHNOLOGIES, INC. ($78,623.14, including sales tax) ibrary Roo (G) AUTHORIZATION TO ADVERTISE FOR STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATION FROM Project J CONSULTANTS FOR THE DESIGN OF THE LIBRARY ROOF REHABILITATION PROJECT SR-104 to nd Ave. S (H) AUTHORIZATION TO ADVERTISE FOR STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATION FROM Sewer Main CONSULTANTS FOR THE DESIGN OF THE SR104 TO SECOND AVENUE SOUTH 24- Project INCH SEWER MAIN REHABILITATION PROJECT Prisoner Detention (J) AUTHORIZATION FOR MAYOR TO SIGN AMENDMENT TO PRISONER Agreement DETENTION AGREEMENT ADDENDUM FOR YEAR 2001 WITH CITY OF Sewer LYNNWOOD utfall Cathodic (K) AUTHORIZATION FOR MAYOR TO SIGN ADDENDUM NO. 1 TO THE Projection PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH COSMOPOLITAN ENGINEERING Project GROUP FOR THE SEWER OUTFALL-CATHODIC PROJECTION PROJECT cc Dept. (L) AUTHORIZATION FOR THE PURCHASE AND REPLACEMENT OF POLICE iturep DEPARTMENT FURNITURE FROM COMMERCIAL OFFICE INTERIORS Declare (M) AUTHORIZATION TO DECLARE UNIT #080, A 1995 POLICE PATROL SEDAN, Vehicle No. 080 Surplus SURPLUS AND SELL VEHICLE TO FINANCIAL CONSULTANTS INTERNATIONAL ideshare (N) PROCLAMATION IN HONOR OF RIDESHARE WEEK, OCTOBER 15 —19, 2001 Week Item I: Authorization for Mavor to Sign Professional Services Agreement with Pentec Environmental for Stream Stream Inventory and Assessment Project Inventory & Councilmember Petso asked why there was no other bid proposals/competitive offers. Development Assessment Services Director Duane Bowman described the process of establishing a list of qualified firms, Project explaining firms are then selected for small contract items such as this based upon their qualifications. Staff reviewed the proposals and interviewed and selected Pentec based on their expertise and previous work record with the City. COUNCILMEMBER PETSO MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER MARIN, FOR APPROVAL OF ITEM I. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. The item approved is as follows: (1) AUTHORIZATION FOR MAYOR TO SIGN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH PENTEC ENVIRONMENTAL FOR STREAM INVENTORY AND ASSESSMENT PROJECT Student 3. INTRODUCTION OF NEW STUDENT REPRESENTATIVE MEREDITH STOREY resenta- Council President Earling introduced Student Representative Meredith Storey, a student at Meadowdale High School, and described her interests, which include competitive swimming. Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes October 16, 2001 Page 2 Rezone 4. PUBLIC HEARING ON THE PLANNING BOARD RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE A Application East of 9715 REZONE APPLICATION FOR A PORTION OF THE PARKING LOT THAT FRONTS ON Edmonds EDMONDS WAY, JUST EAST OF THE CAR WASH AT 9715 EDMONDS WAY, FROM RM 1.5 Way (File # TO BN (File No. R-2001-94 / Applicant: Rob Michel) 2001-94 Mayor Haakenson advised this was a quasi-judicial hearing and, in accordance with the Appearance of Fairness Doctrine, asked whether any Councilmember had any conflicts or ex-parte communication to declare. Councilmember Plunkett asked if public disclosure records maintained in Olympia and Snohomish County constituted disclosure. City Attorney Scott Snyder answered yes, regarding financial contributions. Council President Earling disclosed his firm had a property listed for Rob Michel, not in the vicinity of the subject property but north of Perrinville. Mayor Haakenson asked whether any audience members had any objection to Council President Earling's or Councilmember Plunkett's participation. There were no objections voiced and Mayor Haakenson advised all Councilmembers would participate. He advised staff would have five minutes for their presentation and the applicant would have ten minutes for their presentation. Senior Planner Steve Bullock explained the applicant recently received approval for a 10-lot formal plat for the property identified on the vicinity map (Attachment 1 of the Council packet). He explained the northern 2/3 of the parcel was in the single-family zone and the recently approved plat has eight single- family lots proposed in that area. Two lots were proposed and approved in the southern 1/3 of the site. He identified the southwest corner that the applicant requested be rezoned from RM 1.5 (multifamily) to BN (Neighborhood Business). Mr. Bullock referred to Exhibit 2, the Staff Report, explaining pages 3 and 4 described how the proposal met the rezone criteria. Exhibit 3, the Planning Board minutes, reflects their deliberation and recommendation to approve the proposed rezone. Councilmember Petso recalled several times the Council has been encouraged to create more available housing to meet GMA housing targets, provide affordable housing, prevent sprawl, etc.; however, the proposed rezone would eliminate housing. She questioned how this could be reconciled with the encouragement in the past to create more housing. Mr. Bullock referred to page 4 of Exhibit 2 (Planning Division Advisory Report), summarizing the property fronting on Edmonds Way has been zoned multifamily for 20-30 years but has not been developed multifamily. During that time, traffic flows have increased, reducing the likelihood multifamily would be developed in this area. He said an adjacent property owner provided testimony to the Planning Board regarding his willingness to redevelop this land. This, together with the fact the land has not been developed in over 20-30 years, lead staff to the conclusion it was not suitable for multifamily and recommended approval of the rezone. Councilmember Petso observed this property was on a transit line. She asked whether creating more housing near transportation facilities was a GMA goal or was something the City pursued because it made sense. Mr. Bullock answered it was a combination of those factors. Applicant Rob Michel, 7907 212th Street SW, Edmonds, asked to reserve one minute for rebuttal. He explained the Planning Board has been considering the property from the car wash to the signal at 95`h for some time including holding a number of public hearings. He said several neighbors were concerned with the Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes October 16, 2001 Page 3 possibility of the entire parcel being rezoned to Business. The Planning Board tabled the discussion previously because no property owners wanted to pursue any action. When he purchased the property, he determined the best use of the upper portion was residential; the lower portion would be developed multifamily and the car wash expressed interest in purchasing a portion of the lower area. He said developing the lower area multifamily would help define the end of the business zone, assisting the Planning Board in determining uses for the remainder of the property in that area. Councilmember Petso asked if he planned to apply for a rezone for the remainder of the property. Mr. Michel answered the remainder of the property would be zoned RM 1.5 and developed with multifamily. The upper property remains R-8 and will be developed with single-family residential. Mayor Haakenson opened the public participation portion of the public hearing. Hearing no comment, he closed the public participation and remanded the matter to Council for action. Councilmember Plunkett commented the proposed rezone met the six rezone criteria. COUNCILMEMBER PLUNKETT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER MILLER, THAT THE COUNCIL UPHOLD THE PLANNING BOARD RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE THE REZONE REQUEST TO ALLOW THE PROPERTY TO BE REZONED TO BN. Councilmember Petso reiterated her concern with this action, recalling that the City had previously interpreted the GMA to require that the City place a dwelling unit on "every single square inch of property in this town," but this action ignored that interpretation in favor of allowing an adjacent business to be expanded. Council President Earling commented the proposal was following through on a community policy of being a good neighbor. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Edmonds 5. PUBLIC HEARING ON EDMONDS CROSSING — PINE STREET FERRY TRAFFIC STUDY Crossing — Pine Street Ferry Traffic City Engineer Dave Gebert explained the purpose of the public hearing was to present the results and Study recommendations of the Edmonds Crossing — Pine Street Ferry Traffic Study. He noted in addition to City staff and CH2M Hill, representatives from Washington State Ferries (WSF) and Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) served on a Technical Advisory Committee. WSDOT, WSF, and the City of Lynnwood have reviewed the draft report. A public open house was held in August to present the status of the study at that point and receive public input and questions. He noted the open house was well attended and a number of helpful comments were provided. He pointed out there were a number of conflicting issues/concerns raised and acknowledged it may not be possible to meet all preferences and desires. The recommendation in the study represents the best option for meeting the overall objective as well as the best compromise for a solution. Jeanne Acutanza, CH2M Hill, described the origin destination component of the study that surveyed several locations around the perimeter of the City to determine how traffic entered and exited the City as well as locations within the City to estimate paths that ferry traffic uses. She explained the origin destination study was conducted in spring 2001 to maintain statistical validity, recognizing winter traffic was subject to weather conditions and summer traffic was subject to recreational events. The study was conducted on a Wednesday, Friday, and Saturday for two hours each day. She noted information from Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes October 16, 2001 Page 4 WSF indicated vehicular traffic during summer months was approximately 15% higher than spring months. Ms. Acutanza described the distribution of traffic boarding ferries (estimating 88% of the ferry trips were captured) — 12% used local streets within the City and 64% used designated ferry routes. For vehicles off-loading from the ferry, 8% used local streets and 67% used the designated ferry route, SR104. The study concluded that over 200 vehicles in a two-hour period used SR104, the designated ferry route. She identified a portion of SR524 near Caspers and Dayton Avenue that had between 100-200 vehicles in the 2-hour period; the remainder of the City had less than 200 vehicles. She summarized the impact of ferry traffic on City streets, explaining 45-55% of traffic on SR104 was ferry related, 5-10% on SR524 was ferry related, 20-25% on Olympic View Drive and 3rd Avenue and the remainder of streets had less than 5% ferry traffic impact. Ms. Acutanza reviewed existing conditions, explaining when the ferry queue extended past Pine Street, barricades were erected by WSF and a barricade was placed at Pine and 3rd Avenue. She described 15 alternatives: • Alternative 1 a Existing Operations and Enforcement • Alternative lb —Reduced Enforcement and Restrictions • Alternative 1 c — Existing Operations with Increased Enforcement • Alternative 2a — Peak Period Half Gate Closure (manual gate during peak periods, restricting access from Pine Street accompanied by flashing signs indicating the route was closed) • Alternative 2b — Peak Period Half Gate Closure with No Right Turn • Alternative 2c — Peak Period Half Gate Closure with Median Barrier • Alternative 3a — Peak Period Full Gate Closure • Alternative 3b — Peak Period Full Gate Closure with No Right Turn • Alternative 3c — Peak Period Full Gate Closure with Median Barrier • Alternative 4a — Permanent Partial Closure • Alternative 4b — Permanent Partial Closure with No Right Turn • Alternative 4c — Permanent Partial Closure with Median Barrier • Alternative 5 — Permanent Full Closure • Alternative 6a — Traffic Signal • Alternative 6b — Traffic Signal with Right Turn Restrictions Ms. Acutanza displayed a map identifying routes where traffic would be increased/decreased as a result of the above alternatives. She explained based on comments from the open house and the study/evaluation, a decision was made to consider four options. She described pros and cons of the first alternative, 1 c (increasing enforcement) — this would allow cross -street access at all times, control safety, possibly increase safety, require WSDOT approval, concern for the officer's safety. The annual cost of this option is $33,000, which would increase as congestion increases and with cost of living increases. The second alternative to be studied further was 3a (peak period full gate closure). This would be a temporary action, allow cross street access at all times, represents a compromise, flexible, addresses peak period line cutting and safety, some slight safety issues with vehicles that may try to avoid the gate and possibly creates a slight delay in emergency response time waiting for the gate to open. The cost of this option is $80,000 to install the gate. The third option to be studied further was Alternative 5 (permanent full closure). Pros and cons include improved pedestrian safety along SR104, addresses safety and line cutting, restricts local access Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes October 16, 2001 Page 5 permanently, impact to emergency response time, and would require a turnaround area. The cost of this option was $92,000 to construct. The fourth option to be studied further was Alternative 6a (traffic signals). This would allow access at all times and improvepedestrian access as well as safety and control. This option would not address line cutting, therefore, the barricades should be maintained. This option also requires WSDOT approval. The cost of this option is over $275,000 to install the signal. She noted a signal was planned at this intersection as part of the Edmonds Crossing project. Ms. Acutanza concluded the recommended option was 3a (peak period full gate closure). Traffic Engineer Darrell Smith reviewed comments provided at the August 23 public open house including varying degrees of support for the four alternatives, support for considering a signal, a suggestion to consider sending traffic up Walnut Street, using tally slips like Kingston, a suggestion to use 238`h Street, a suggestion to use 9"' Avenue, and improving and developing a sign plan. He responded to several of the comments, pointing out the difficulty of using tally slips because SR104 was not the only route to the ferry. Regarding the use of 238`h Street SW, he noted that although 238`h was currently classified as an arterial, there was concern expressed regarding traffic volumes and ingress/egress to properties. He said this could be addressed in part by accelerating proposed improvements on 238`h (2-way left turn lanes and sidewalk improvements scheduled to be constructed in 2007). Regarding the use of 9`h Avenue, Mr. Smith explained concern was expressed regarding traffic volumes and speeds. He said the study assisted in determining 9`h Avenue was a logical route. Mr. Smith displayed a diagram illustrating "way finding" and signage. He concluded ferry users should be directed to SR104 via various collection routes. Mr. Gebert summarized the study recommendations: • Work with WSDOT, WSF and Lynnwood to improve signage on I-5, Hwy. 99 and within the City to route ferry traffic to SR104, remove Pine Street as a signed ferry route, and provide advanced notice throughout the City when Pine Street is closed • Implement (Alternative 3a) peak period full gate closure at Pine Street and SR104 • Use Walnut Street to route ferry traffic from 3rd Avenue S to 9th Avenue S to SR104 when peak period closure of Pine Street is in place • Perform long-term monitoring of the effects of the peak period closure of Pine Street • Consider accelerating 238`h Street SW improvements • Construct a signal including crosswalks at Pine Street at SR104 in conjunction with the Edmonds Crossing project Mr. Gebert recommended the Council approve the recommendations of the study and direct staff to finalize the report, completing the study. Councilmember Petso inquired about public notice for the public hearing, asking whether those interested in the process were provided a direct -mail notice. City Clerk Sandy Chase advised over 1500 were provided notice. Councilmember Petso expressed concern that rather than using 238`h Street SW, ferry users may discover that 2401h Street SW [this was later corrected to 236`h Street SW], a residential street, was a faster, more Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes October 16, 2001 Page 6 direct route. Mr. Gebert said 238th Street SW was a better route but acknowledged the possibility that ferry commuters may choose alternate routes. Councilmember Petso asked how backups past Westgate could be alleviated. Mr. Gebert advised the solution was the Edmonds Crossing project. He explained this study did not evaluate alternatives for backups beyond 9th Avenue and focused primarily on Pine Street. Councilmember Petso inquired about the level of service (LOS) F condition at 238th/SR104. Mr. Smith explained LOS F represented failure. LOS D represented an approximate 15-20 second wait. LOS E represented maximum use of the infrastructure. He said LOS F was an indication that routes need to be changed or improvements made. Councilmember Petso observed the preferred alternative included signage on 76`h which would direct traffic through two school zones and a hospital zone. She noted ferry commuters are often in a hurry and expressed concern with a ferry route through these areas. Mr. Smith noted ferry commuters to the north pass through the school zone for Meadowdale High School. He agreed school zones were a concern, explaining the intent of the proposed solution was to increase volumes at a variety of locations via signage and avoid increasing traffic on only one street. Councilmember Miller asked whether the residents on Walnut Street had been notified of the recommendation to use Walnut Street to route ferry traffic from 3rd Avenue. Mr. Gebert advised a special notice regarding that recommendation was not provided but residents received notification of this public hearing. Council President Earling asked how ferry users would know when to use Walnut during peak period closures. Mr. Gebert explained north of Walnut Street on 3rd there would be a flashing sign indicating Pine Street was closed and directing ferry traffic up Walnut Street. Signs would be located along Walnut Street, followed by a sign at 9th Avenue directing ferry traffic to SR104. He noted the sign on 3rd Avenue would only operate when the gate at Pine Street was closed. Council President Earling pointed out the difficult topography on Walnut Street. Mr. Gebert said the possibility of closure during snow was considered and staff concluded Walnut Street was preferable to other options due to the width of the street and controlled intersections. Councilmember Plunkett asked how often Walnut Street would be used. Mr. Gebert answered during all peak periods when the gate was closed, primary peak evening times and Saturday mornings. However, as traffic volumes increase, the number of peak periods may also increase. Mayor Haakenson opened the public participation portion of the public hearing. Syd Locke, 110 Pine Street, Edmonds, asked when the peak periods were and how many occur. He said Alternative 3a was acceptable if the intent was only to address westbound traffic, however, eastbound traffic was becoming an increasing problem. He referred to a recent accident at 2nd Avenue and Pine and a hit and run accident at 4th and Pine. He said nothing short of full closure would eliminate problems due to the frequency of ferries. .roan Waggoner, 8713 238`h Street SW, Edmonds, questioned CH2M Hill's traffic study, performed in April 2001, that attributed only two cars per hour on 238th Street SW to ferry traffic. She explained WSDOT's survey, conducted in September 2000 showed 62 cars in a 4-hour period. She pointed out Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes October 16, 2001 Page 7 neither study addressed the peak period between Memorial Day and Labor Day. She said attendees at the August 23 open house were advised traffic would continue to be routed from 76 h to Hwy. 99 and then to 238d' Street SW. She preferred ferry users be directed to SR104. She pointed out there were 144 residential dwelling units between 84th and Edmonds Way, a lot of residents that would be impacted by any increase in ferry traffic. She commented Walnut Street was not mentioned at the open house and the notice provided to residents referred to the Edmonds Crossing -Pine Street Traffic Study; there was no mention of impacts to 2380' Street SW or Walnut Street. Carol Hahn, 10312"d Avenue S, Edmonds, recommended signage improvements be made immediately. She suggested a half gate at 3`d Avenue and Pine to prevent vehicles traveling westbound from turning right, thereby avoiding the need to turn around at the end of Pine Street. She referred to the substantial hill at 7d' and Walnut that would be difficult to negotiate during snow or by large vehicles and trailers. She suggested vehicles could turn left at Dayton to avoid the hill. She noted other than the above concerns, she was in favor of the proposed alternatives. Roger Oliver, 1031 2"d Avenue S, Edmonds, agreed with the concerns expressed regarding the topography of Walnut Street, noting the roadway was already badly rutted from vehicles scraping the pavement. He pointed out semi -trailers would have a great deal of difficulty negotiating this hill. He emphasized the road -closed sign at Pine Street and 3`d Avenue S must serve both north and southbound SR104 as well as westbound Pine Street and 41h Avenue S. He agreed with the proposed expansion of 2381h. He recommended the signal at 236th/SR104 be removed or coordinated with the signal at 238`h/SR104. He concluded the easiest solution would be a southbound off -ramp (before the bridge) from Hwy. 99 to SR104. COUNCILMEMBER MILLER MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER ORVIS, TO EXTEND DISCUSSION OF THIS ITEM FOR 20 MINUTES. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Roger Hertrich, 1020 Puget Drive, Edmonds, agreed with the proposed alternative, pointing out the full closure would only occur a limited number of times per day/week. He said the percentage of cars that use Pine Street was likely very low compared with the number that use SR104. He endorsed staff's recommendation as the best alternative. He pointed out the importance of installing warning signs that operated at times of closure, noting the signs needed to be located early enough in the traffic pattern to allow drivers to follow an alternate route. He did not agree with the alternative to use Walnut Street. He suggested the City consider a traffic signal at 3`d and Pine in the future to eliminate the eastbound backup at Westgate following ferry off-loading. He noted the ferry backup to Westgate could be eliminated by requesting an additional westbound lane for ferry stacking. He encouraged the City to address other ferry related problems in addition to Pine Street. Brad Hanson, 210 Pine Street, Edmonds, referred to written comments he provided and suggested ferry users be routed to Walnut and then right to the ferry line rather than routing traffic down Pine Street. Another alternative to the lighted signage would be to direct traffic from SR524 to 9th Avenue. He commented it likely would be necessary to permanently close Pine Street to prevent ferry commuters from using that route. Hearing no further comment, Mayor Haakenson closed the public participation portion of the public hearing. Councilmember Orvis observed the traffic impacts to 9th Avenue S by full closure and full gate would be less than 1%. Mr. Smith agreed. Councilmember Orvis inquired about the impact to Walnut Street. Mr. Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes October 16, 2001 Page 8 Smith advised there would be an 11% increase in traffic on Walnut Street. He explained currently when Pine Street was closed, there were no signs directing drivers to alternate routes. The proposal was to direct those vehicles north on 3rd and up Walnut to 91h and southbound on 9th to SR104. He noted permanent closure would result in no impact to Walnut Street. Councilmember Orvis asked who maintained the gate, how closures were determined, and the cost to the City. Mr. Smith advised Public Works would maintain the gate and the recommendation was a motor - driven gate that was manually activated by the officers on duty. He explained WSF was in the process of installing cameras along SR104 as well as a variable message sign on westbound SR104 describing the ferry wait. He explained once a backup to Pine Street occurred, the gate would be activated within approximately 15 minutes by officers on duty. He estimated the gate would be activated twice a week during the PM commute. Councilmember Orvis inquired about plans for the intersection in conjunction with the Edmonds Crossing project. Mr. Smith answered there would be a double left turn lane from SR104 westbound onto Pine Street to the Unocal site. He explained the Edmonds Crossing project had the capacity to hold 800 vehicles or four ferry boat waits (3+ hour wait). There would be two right turn lanes for traffic exiting the Edmonds Crossing onto SR104. Councilmember Orvis inquired how access from Edmonds Crossing to Pine Street would be provided. Community Services Director Stephen Clifton advised access from Pine Street to Edmonds Crossing would not be possible, the only access would be from SR104. Residents on Pine Street would maintain access to SR104. In response to concerns raised by the public, Mr. Gebert advised gate closures would occur periodically when the ferry queue extended beyond Pine Street. With regard to problems occurring with eastbound traffic during peak periods, Mr. Gebert said the full gate closure (versus half gate closure) would eliminate that turning movement as well. Regarding the indication in the survey that only small amounts of ferry traffic used 238th, Mr. Gebert said the survey indicated an increase during periods of closure of approximately 61 vehicles in a 1-hour period or 11 %. He acknowledged this was a somewhat significant increase thus the recommendation to accelerate the improvements on 238th. He pointed out 238th was currently signed as the ferry route from Hwy. 99. Mr. Gebert responded to the comment that Walnut Street was not mentioned as an option at the public open house, acknowledging that was true because Walnut had not been considered as an alternative until it was suggested at the open house. When evaluating Walnut Street with other options, staff concluded it was the best option. Regarding the suggestion for a half gate at the east end of Pine and 3rd during peak periods, Mr. Gebert pointed out this would prohibit access to the residences on Pine. Regarding comments about the topography of Walnut Street, he explained Walnut was selected due to the width of the roadway, controlled intersections, and less congestion than on other roadways (such as Dayton). The main objective of the signage program was to "siphon the vehicles off' at 76th and 9th to minimize the number of vehicles that needed to be directed from 3rd Avenue up Walnut to the ferry line. Mr. Gebert agreed with the suggestion that signage should be visible from both directions. He said the proposal included a sign at 3rd and Pine visible from the north and consideration will be given to a sign at Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes October 16, 2001 Page 9 3ra and Walnut. He said before the signage program was implemented, there would be a design process to determine the best locations. Mr. Gebert said the suggestion for an off -ramp from Hwy. 99 to SR104 was a good idea but required WSDOT involvement and would be a high cost solution. Regarding the suggestion to consider more traffic signals, Mr. Gebert explained there were a number of traffic signals identified in the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). Additional signals were not within the scope of this study but would be considered in the future. Regarding the suggestion for an additional lane on SR104, the feasibility and cost of this option would need further study. Regarding the alternatives suggested by Mr. Hanson including directing traffic from SR524 to 9th Avenue to SR 104 and avoiding any signage closer to the ferry, Mr. Smith agreed that would be an option, traffic was encouraged to use 9`''. He said the question remained whether to provide direction for ferry users once they reached downtown. Council President Earling asked whether 238th Street SW was an arterial. Mr. Gebert answered it was categorized as a minor arterial. Council President Earling requested staff describe street designations. Mr. Gebert explained streets were categorized based on purpose and traffic volumes. Arterials were main routes intended to move volumes of traffic. A residential street's purpose was smaller traffic volumes in and around residential neighborhoods. Council President Earling asked how long 238th Street SW has been designated as an arterial. Mr. Gebert answered it was categorized as a minor arterial in the Transportation Element of the Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Smith advised it had been classified as an arterial at least 6-7 years. Council President Earling recalled a citizen suggested phasing the project rather than doing it all at once such as erecting signage immediately. He asked whether this was feasible. Mr. Gebert answered some additional time would be required to develop the plan and the estimates for the gate included some signage. Ms. Acutanza commented signage would need to be coordinated with WSDOT and Lynnwood, which may take some additional time. Council President Earling referred to the comment that the signal at 236th could be removed or coordinating that signal with the signal at 238th. He assumed the signal at 2361h was necessary due to the school on 236fl . Mr. Smith agreed, noting the two signals could be coordinated. Council President Earling commented the study was a good effort but he was not convinced that 7th and Walnut was feasible due to the dip in the road at that location. He pointed out the need to study that issue further and provide alternatives. Councilmember Petso referred to the suggestion to remove the sign routing traffic through Lynnwood and direct all ferry traffic from I-5 to SR104. Mr. Smith agreed, noting the State's sign policy was to sign only one route to a ferry terminal. The route for the Edmonds -Kingston ferry is I-5 to SR104. However, the City has an additional State Route (SR524) which does not include ferry signage until drivers reach 3rd Avenue, possibly due to encouragement from the City for WSF to assist drivers in reaching the ferry terminal. He clarified there were no signs in Lynnwood directing traffic to the ferry. Councilmember Petso said the packet indicated Westgate was LOS C; she asked what the level of service was following ferry offloading. Mr. Smith answered there were peaks when the signal experienced levels of service near F. He said a recent inventory of all state routes in the City indicated that signal had an average level of service of C. Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes October 16, 2001 Page 10 Councilmember Petso questioned why it was the City's responsibility to fix the intersection if the downgraded level of service occurred as a result of the ferry. Mr. Smith agreed it was a ferry -related problem on a WSDOT facility. However, once cities reach a certain size (which Edmonds has surpassed) it becomes the City's responsibility for maintaining and providing improvements. The City's Comprehensive Plan indicates both the City and State will take responsibility for maintaining an acceptable level of service standard on SR104. Councilmember Petso asked whether the signage routing traffic down 238th would only be operational when the Pine Street gate was closed. Mr. Smith answered it was operational full-time. The sign includes an arrow directing traffic to 238th westbound, stating SR104 is to the west. COUNCILMEMBER PLUNKETT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER ORVIS, TO EXTEND THIS ITEM FOR TEN MINUTES. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Mayor Haakenson remanded the matter to Council for action. Councilmember Miller expressed concern with rerouting traffic to Walnut, particular due to the possibility of vehicles and semi -trucks scraping the roadway on what was essentially a residential street. He agreed more data regarding that alternative was necessary. He noted that although a public process occurred for notifying the public, the notice referred only to the Edmonds Crossing -Pine Street Traffic Study, which likely did not concern residents on Walnut Street. He suggested notification be sent to residents on Walnut informing them that both Walnut Street and 238th Street SW were included in the final recommendation. Councilmember Marin commented he attended the open house where there were at least five groups with different concerns. He was impressed with the way Mr. Gebert, Mr. Smith and Ms. Acutanza studied this issue. To anyone concerned with line cutting, he explained ferry commuters use cell phones to report anyone cutting into line to the Police Department who then issues a ticket. Councilmember Marin expressed his appreciation for the careful consideration of all aspects, noting there was not a solution that would resolve the issue to everyone's satisfaction. COUNCILMEMBER MARIN MOVED TO APPROVE THE RECOMMENDATION WITH THE CAVEAT THAT ANOTHER LOOK WOULD BE TAKEN AT WALNUT. THE MOTION DIED FOR LACK OF A SECOND. Councilmember Orvis commented this was a no win situation. He recalled when doorbelling for an unrelated issue, he heard complaints from residents east of Pine who told him their small residential street became a highway when the gates are closed. If nothing was done, those residents would continue to be upset. If Alternate 3a was selected, residents on Walnut Street would be upset. If Pine Street was closed, residents on Pine would be upset and regardless of what was done, residents on 238th Street SW would be upset. Councilmember Orvis noted safety was the primary concern and dictated the intersection be closed at least during peak hours, requiring either Alternative 3a or complete closure. In order to eliminate as much ferry traffic in downtown as possible, he favored complete closure, which would move traffic at least up to 9th. Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes October 16, 2001 Page 11 Council President Earling referred to the concern raised by Councihnember Miller regarding notification of residents on Walnut Street and the concern expressed by citizens regarding the topography at 7t` and Walnut Street. He recommended the Council not take action tonight and request staff return in 60 days with further analysis and alternatives to the use of Walnut Street. He also recommended the Council continue the public hearing and provide information to residents on Walnut Street. COUNCIL PRESIDENT EARLING MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER MILLER, TO CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR 60 DAYS TO STUDY THE WALNUT STREET ALIGNMENT AND IDENTIFY ALTERNATIVES TO THAT ALIGNMENT AND RETURN FOR A SECOND PUBLIC HEARING. Councilmember Plunkett commented this was an excellent start and was the most work that had been done to address this issue in years. He agreed with the need to study the Walnut Street alignment, provide notification to residents on Walnut and identify other alternatives. He was uncertain whether another public hearing was necessary. Councilmember Petso requested staff provide further information regarding routing ferry traffic through three school zones. She also expressed concern with routing ferry traffic through the LOS F intersection at 238`" and SR104 or the possibility of ferry users discovering 236`h Street SW was a preferable alternative to 238t'. She questioned whether additional public comment could be provided at a continued public hearing since the public participation portion of the public hearing had been closed. Mayor Haakenson assured additional public testimony would be allowed. Council President Earling clarified his intent was to only have staff study Walnut Street. He suggested staff provide Councilmember Petso additional information to address her questions but not conduct additional research and analysis on other areas of the recommendation. MOTION CARRIED, COUNCILMEMBER PETSO OPPOSED. Mayor Haakenson declared a brief recess. Port District 6. PRESENTATION OF PORT DISTRICT MASTER PLAN Master Plan Bill Toskey, Port of Edmonds Executive Director, recognized Port Commissioners Bruce Faires and Ken Reid in the audience. Mr. Toskey explained the Port was required by the Legislature to periodically develop a Master Plan which has historically been done every 5-10 years depending on the progress made on the prior Master Plan. In 1995-1996, a Master Plan was completed following an extensive public involvement process, a Master Plan that was anticipated to take 14 years to complete due to financial considerations. Unfortunately the storm -related disaster of December 1996 resulted in the Port completing the Master Plan in approximately 14 months. The 1995-1996 Master Plan primarily focused on the waterside of the Port. The Port then realized the land portion of the Port also needed to be updated and made compatible with the water portion and the community. A process was established to accomplish that, including splitting the planning process into two plans, a Strategic Plan (policy, philosophy and mission statement) and Master Plan (physical layout). These plans were developed with a significant amount of input; the Strategic Plan was approved a year ago. The Strategic Plan referenced the development of a Master Plan which was developed via an extensive public process that included seven focus groups, three major public meetings, a number of public Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes October 16, 2001 Page 12 hearings at Port Commission meetings and special meetings. The result of this effort was a Master Plan that the Port Commissioners approved four months ago and submitted to the City for inclusion in the City's Comprehensive Plan. He advised the City's Planning Board has reviewed and approved the Port Master Plan. He noted the planning process had begun on portions of the Master Plan but would not be completed until the Master Plan was approved by the Council and incorporated into the City's Comprehensive Plan. Chris Keuss, Port of Edmonds Deputy Director, reviewed details of the Master Plan, referring to the updated Master Plan drawing that was provided to each Councilmember. Beginning at the entrance of the Port property, he explained there will be entrance signage and landscaping at this location. A 135 space parking lot is proposed to be developed in the existing gravel area in the northeast corner of the Port property. This will be one of the first projects in the Master Plan as the parking will serve future buildings. He explained there were no plans to remodel or change the parking or buildings in the Arnie's complex. On the waterside, the Master Plan proposes expanding the boardwalk in accordance with one of the goals of the Master Plan to provide more public access to the waterfront and view corridors along the waterfront. Further south on Admiral Way on the left are two building complexes that are proposed to house marine retail and a marine repair complex. He identified a large mixed use area proposed across the street, explaining one of the uses proposed in this area was the FACE art center. In response to a question from Council President Earling regarding the amount of space FACE would occupy, Mr. Keuss explained FACE was proposed to occupy the entire building. Their use may include artists in residence, a cafeteria, coffee shop, open space for galleries, etc. Mr. Keuss continued his review of the Master Plan, commenting 1-2 more buildings were proposed in this area to house the yacht club, a large meeting area and restrooms, and marine retail. To the south was a parking area. He noted the existing Port administration building was proposed to be eliminated and the administration functions relocated to the Anthony Homeport restaurant where the yacht club was currently located. He advised Anthony's Home Port planned a major remodel or demolition/reconstruction of their facility on the same site. He noted the parking on the waterside of Anthony's was proposed to be eliminated and replaced with an open area/plaza to fulfill the goal of more public open space. Across the street, the gravel parking area is proposed to be developed with more formal parking. To the north of the parking area, the current work yard, will remain unchanged. Further south on Admiral Way, the parking areas remain the same. Some expansion is proposed on the north side of the dry stack to accommodate an additional 80-100 boats. He identified a parking area adjacent to the dry stacking on the west side of Admiral Way that was proposed to be relocated to the other side of Admiral Way, adding 15-20 parking spaces. He noted much of this parking accommodated Marina Beach Park. Mayor Haakenson asked how wide the road became when parking was moved to the east side of Admiral Way. Mr. Keuss answered 60-feet including the parking. Mayor Haakenson pointed out this was a problem as the parking was placed in the City's right-of-way. Mr. Keuss indicated the Port would be happy to work with the City to address this issue. He noted the Master Plan showed parking on the east side of Admiral Way with the understanding the right-of-way would be resolved. Councilmember Petso inquired about the impact to the number of parking spaces with the proposed Master Plan. Mr. Keuss answered the Master Plan resulted in a gain of a few parking spaces. Councilmember Petso inquired what the Council was doing by adopting the Port's Master Plan in the City's Comprehensive Plan; whether the Council would be agreeing to waive the regulations with regard Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes October 16, 2001 Page 13 to heights, setbacks, Shoreline Master Plan, or if the Council was just recognizing the Plan. City Attorney Scott Snyder advised the Council was not being asked to approve the Master Plan tonight. Mayor Haakenson commented a public hearing was scheduled before the Council on December 4 as part of the public hearing on all of this year's proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Snyder explained the City's Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code must be consistent. In the past, details of the Zoning Code controlled; after GMA, the Comprehensive Plan controlled. Therefore, if the Council approved a Comprehensive Plan, the City was required to consider necessary zoning changes to implement the substantive provisions in the Plan. He clarified if there were inconsistencies between the Master Plan and the City's Zoning Ordinance, they needed to be resolved. Councilmember Petso pointed out the Master Plan did not indicate heights. Mr. Snyder responded the Zoning Code would then control that issue. He explained the Comprehensive Plan provided planning structure and the Zoning Code provided specifics. Community Services Director Stephen Clifton, a member of the Port Planning Committee, advised there was nothing in the Master Plan or the Strategic Plan that referred to exceeding existing height limits. If this was desired by the Port in the future, a rezone request would be required. As a former Council liaison to the Port, Councilmember Plunkett commented the Master Plan was inspirational and the Port was on its way to creating one of the finest small ports on the coast. He looked forward to working with the Port to complete the Master Plan. Councilmember Marin, the current Council liaison to the Port, was impressed with the Master Plan, noting a great deal of visioning has occurred. Mayor Haakenson congratulated Commissioners and the Directors for the public process and planning that has occurred, noting the Port would be an amenity to the City. He recalled how hard the City worked to resolve the Unocal easement issue, particularly to maintain a 60-foot easement to access Marina Beach. He found it disconcerting that the 60-foot easement was eliminated in the Port's Master Plan, even with the caveat that the issue would be resolved in the future. He urged the Port to meet with Mr. Clifton and him prior to December 4 to avoid any disagreement on the 60-foot easement at the public hearing. 7. AUDIENCE COMMENTS 13riatment r Elaine Yard 9209 Olympic View Drive Edmonds reported on a recent Bri htWater meeting, Treatment �> P g g, Plant commenting she was disappointed because "the pictures don't match." She expressed concern that the public was not being told the whole story; there were differing reports regarding whether outfalls 1, 2 and 3 were being eliminated. She recommended more information be circulated to the community. In Public addition, she commented there have been Public Facilities District (PFD) meetings that the public has not Facilities been informed of. She described development that could occur at Unocal. She encouraged the City to District provide additional information and to include the public in the PFD meetings. Roger Hertrich, 1020 Puget Drive, Edmonds, reported the PFD Board has held a total of seven Pnblic meetings including one on Monday, October 16. He learned the newspapers receive only 24 hours acilities g g �'��' ;strict advance notice of the meetings, not enough time to publish the notice resulting in the public not being aware of the meetings. He reported the PFD Board seemed to be meeting approximately every Monday between 1:00 and 3:00 on the third floor of City Hall. He commented minutes of the meetings were available that indicated the consultants have submitted a draft report. He pointed out the Council was too restrictive in the area they directed be studied because by indicating "downtown," they did not include the Unocal site. He urged the Council to have Unocal included in the study as an alternative. He said the consultant's report indicated the project was not economically feasible in downtown Edmonds but the consultants' research indicated meeting planners were more interested in holding an event in Edmonds Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes October 16, 2001 Page 14 than Lynnwood. He pointed out the possibility of a destination resort/conference center at Unocal. He reiterated his request that the study be expanded to include Unocal. Public Councilmember Plunkett asked staff to address the comments regarding public notification of PFD Board Facilities meetings. Mr. Clifton answered the PFD Board sets meeting dates and times as necessary and all District meetings have been advertised as required. He commented that members of the public have attended PFD Board meetings and encouraged anyone interested in attending PFD Board meetings to call City Hall to determine when their next meeting would be. Upcoming meetings have been scheduled for October 22 and the first week of November. Councilmember Plunkett objected to the allegation that meetings were being held covertly, noting it was a disservice to accuse a public board of this type of action. He emphasized the meetings were public and notified according to State law. Mr. Clifton acknowledged some of the meetings had short notice as the Board may set a meeting for the following week. Mr. Clifton clarified he was not a boardmember but attended meetings to monitor their progress. Public Mr. Clifton referred to the comment made by Mr. Hertrich regarding including Unocal in the area study, Facilities explaining the Unocal site will not have final cleanup until 2004. The Council chose the three areas of District study (Hwy. 99 corridor, downtown, and Puget Sound Christian College) due to the availability of land before the deadline of January 1, 2003. He explained if construction on the project did not begin by January 1, 2003, the PFD no longer had access to the .033% sales and use tax. Regarding the economic viability indicated by the study, Mr. Clifton explained the draft study indicates the viability of a hotel was not likely at this time but there was a market demand for both a convention/conference center and a Performing Arts facility. Once the PFD Board receives the final study, they will determine whether to move forward and, if so, with what type of project. Mr. Snyder advised posting of the October 15 PFD meeting was not accomplished. However, notices were mailed to the media and public. He invited any member of the public interested in receiving notice to contact City Clerk Sandy Chase. Councilmember Petso asked if the dates of the PFD Board meetings could be posted on Channel 21. Mr. ublie Clifton answered that was planned. Councilmember Petso asked whether Unocal could be added to the Facilities istrict study. Mr. Clifton answered the consultants were asked to conduct the study by reviewing three areas the Council specified. Adding another study area would be an additional expense as it would be outside the scope of services. 8. REPORT ON CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETINGS mance Finance Committee ommittee Councilmember Miller reported the committee reviewed funding for the 800 MHz radio system. He explained the City's portion of the funding was estimated at $426,393. Approximately $333,060 has been set aside this year; the remaining $93,000 will be addressed in the 2002 budget. The committee then reviewed a proposal regarding purchase and replacement of Police Department furniture. Councilmember Miller explained when the Public Safety Complex was constructed, a contingency was included to purchase new furniture; however, there were not sufficient funds available to completely furnish the facility. The estimated cost of the furniture is $39,320 based on the lowest bid. This item was approved on the Consent Agenda. The final item the committee reviewed was the City's financial policies. The committee directed staff to distribute the drafts they have collected from other cities to the entire Council for review and comment. After receiving ' input from the Council, the committee will schedule an update for the November meeting. Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes October 16, 2001 Page 15 unity Community Services/Development Services Committee °esi Councilmember Orvis reported the committee received a presentation regarding the downtown parking lopment ces study. The study will be presented to the full Council in November. The committee then reviewed a ttee draft Comprehensive Park, Recreation and Open Space Plan. A public hearing on the Plan will be held in December. Next, the committee considered a proposed 4-way stop at 88th Avenue West and 188th Street Southwest. Traffic Engineer Darrell Smith determined traffic warrants and other traffic information justified a 4-way stop at this intersection. The committee then discussed the Perrinville Municipal Urban Growth Area (MUGA). Councilmember Orvis explained there is a section of unincorporated Snohomish County between Edmonds and Lynnwood on the southeast corner of 76th and Olympic View. Edmonds will continue discussing this with Lynnwood. The last item considered by the committee was Guiding Principles and Adaptive Management Plan for Land Use and Water -Related Issues. He explained the plan outlined the City's philosophy, principles, goals and objectives to meet the Endangered Species Act. The committee directed staff to place this item on a future Council agenda as a 5 minute discussion item. blic Safety Committee public Safety Committee Councilmember Plunkett reported the committee discussed an amendment to the Prisoner Detention Agreement with Lynnwood that addresses reimbursement to Whatcom County for prisoner transportation service along the I-5 corridor. The Agreement was approved on the Consent Agenda. 9. MAYOR'S COMMENTS Information on Mayor Haakenson commented that due to the unfortunate environment the country has found itself in erronsm and io-terrorism since September 11, his office has fielded many telephone calls regarding terrorism and bio-terrorism. He encouraged anyone with concerns to visit any of the various links that have been added to the City's website. He commented the City was doing everything within its power from a public safety standpoint to deal with these concerns. 10. COUNCIL COMMENTS itizen's Council President Earling advised there was a vacancy on the Citizen's Commission on Salaries for Commission Elected Officials. He invited anyone interested in serving on the committee to pick u an application in n Salaries of y g p p pp Elected the City Hall lobby. The deadline for submitting an application is Friday, November 16 at 5:00 p.m. Officials Council President Earling reported he spoke with former City Councilmember Jack Wilson who was visiting from southern California. Councilmember Miller commended Mayor Haakenson and staff for the proactive steps they have taken regarding educating the public about terrorism and bio-terrorism. Councilmember Marin reported he is completing two weeks of recall to duty in the Naval Reserve, working in the Regional Operations Center. As a member of the Health District Board, he proposed the Health District develop a plan for dealing with any potential threats. He referred to the public's concern with bio-terrorism threats, and emphasized Anthrax was not an "effective poor man's nuclear weapon." He urged the public not to be afraid and to get on with their lives. Mayor Haakenson welcomed Student Representative Meredith Storey. W=erbusiness,e Council meeting was adjourned at 10:00 p.m. ARY KENSON, MAYOR SANDRA S. CHASE, CITY CLERK Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes October 16, 2001 Page 16 AGENDA EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL Council Chambers, Public Safety Complex 250 Sth Avenue North 7:00 - 10:00 p.m. OCTOBER 16, 2001 1 6:45 P.M. - Executive Session Regarding a Real Estate Matter 7:00 P.M. - Call to Order Flag Salute 1. Approval of Agenda 2. Consent Agenda Items (A) Roll Call (13) Approval of City Council Meeting Minutes of September 25, 2001 (C) Approval of claim checks #50830 through #50986 for the week of September 24, 2001, in the amount of $332,281.91. Approval of claim checks #50987 through #51177 for the week of October 1, 2001, in the amount of $174,252.97. Approval of claim checks #51178 through #51343 for the week of October 8, 2001, in the amount of $214,859.96. Approval of payroll direct deposits and checks #3273 through #3370 for the period September 16 through September 30, 2001, in the amount of $689,200.86. (D) Acknowledge receipt of Claim for Damages from Don and Odessa Armand ($1,000) (E) Report on the General Fund and other selected funds financial position for the month ending August 2001 (F) Report on bids opened October 3, 2001, for the Admiral Way Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation Project, and award of contract to Insituform Technologies, Inc. ($78,623.14, including sales tax) (G) Authorization to advertise for Statements of Qualification from consultants for the design of the Library Roof Rehabilitation Project Page 1 of 2 CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA October 16, 2001 Page 2 of 2 (H) Authorization to advertise for Statements of Qualification from consultants for the design of the SR104 to Second Avenue South 24-inch Sewer Main Rehabilitation Project (1) Authorization for Mayor to sign Professional Services Agreement with Pentec Environmental for Stream Inventory and Assessment Project (J) Authorization for Mayor to sign Amendment to Prisoner Detention Agreement Addendum for Year 2001 with City of Lynnwood (K) Authorization for Mayor to sign Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Cosmopolitan Engineering Group for the Sewer Outfall- Cathodic Protection Project (L) Authorization for the purchase and replacement of Police Department furniture from Commercial Office Interiors (M) Authorization to declare Unit #080, a 1995 Police Patrol Sedan, surplus and sell vehicle to Financial Consultants International (N) Proclamation in honor of Rideshare Week, October 15 - 19, 2001 3. ( 5 Min.) Introduction of new Student Representative Meredith Storey 4. (15 Min.) Public Hearing on the Planning Board recommendation to approve a rezone application for a portion of the parking lot that fronts on Edmonds Way, just east of the car wash at 9715 Edmonds Way, from RM 1.5 to BN (File No. R-2001-94 / Applicant: Rob Michel) 5. (45 Min.) Public Hearing on Edmonds Crossing - Pine Street Ferry Traffic Study 6. (45 Min.) Presentation of Port District Master Plan 7. Audience Comments (3 Minute Limit Per Person) 8. (15 Min.) Report on City Council Committee Meetings 9. ( 5 Min.) Mayor's Comments 10. (15 Min.) Council Comments ADJOURN Parking and meeting rooms are accessible for persons with disabilities. Contact the City Clerk at (425) 771-0245 with 24 hours advance notice for special accommodations. The Council Agenda as well as a delayed telecast of the meeting appears on AT&T Cable, Channel 21.