SeaShore Transportation Forum 2009-2012 AgreementParties to Agreement
City of Lake Forest Park
King County
City of Seattle
City of Shoreline
City of Bothell
City of Edmonds
City of Kenmore
City of Mountlake Terrace
City of Woodinville
Snohomish County
Seashore Transportation Forum 2010-0343 ,
ATTA2009-2012 Agreement 16871 ENT a
s71
Community Transit
Sound Transit
Port of Seattle
Puget Sound Regional Council
Transportation Improvement Board
Washington State Department of Transportation
Washington State Transportation Commission
Transmittal date to participating members for approval on October 23, 2009.
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into by and among the CITY OF BOTHELL, hereafter called
"Bothell"; the CITY OF KENMORE, hereafter called "Kenmore"; the CITY OF LAKE FOREST
PARK, hereafter called "Lake Forest Park"; the CITY OF SEATTLE, hereafter called "Seattle"; the
CITY OF SHORELINE, hereafter called "Shoreline"; the CITY OF WOODINVILLE, hereafter called
"Woodinville"; the CITY OF-MOUNTLAKE TERRACE, hereafter called"Mountlake Terrace"; the
CITY OF EDMONDS; hereafter called "Edmonds;" KING COUNTY, a legal 'subdivision of the State of
Washington, hereafter called "King County"; SNOHOMISH COUNTY, a legal subdivision of the State
of Washington, hereafter called "Snohomish County; the PUGET SOUND REGIONAL COUNCIL,
hereafter called the "PSRC"; the CENTRAL PUGET SOUND REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY,
hereafter called "Sound Transit"; SNOHOMISH COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION BENEFIT
AREA, hereafter called "Community Transit"; the WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION, hereafter called "WSDOT"; the WASHINGTON STATE TRANSPORTATION
COMMISSION, hereafter called the "Transportation Commission"; the TRANSPORTATION
IMPROVEMENT BOARD, hereafter called "TIB"; and the PORT OF SEATTLE."
WHEREAS, the parties to this agreement recognize that multi jurisdictional transportation planning and
coordinated transportation plans benefit their citizens; and
WHEREAS, the King County Comprehensive Plan for Public Transportation - Long Range Policy
Framework, adopted in 1993, divided Metro service into three geographic subareas for the purpose of
allocating new transit subsidy; and the Six -Year Transit Development Plan, adopted in 1995, called for
the three subarea transportation boards (the Eastside Transportation Partnership, South County Area
Transportation Board, and Seashore Transportation Forum) to review, refine, and recommend service
priorities to the King County Executive; and
WHEREAS, Sound Transit relies on the three subarea transportation boards to review and recommend
Sound Transit plans and implementation of projects and services; and
WHEREAS, the SeaShore Transportation Forum has served as the central forum for information
sharing, consensus building, and coordination to develop recommendations for transportation policies,
projects and programs for the West King subarea;
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein, the parties hereto agree
as follows:
— — -10— Purpose of Agreement
The purpose of the Agreement is to provide for the continuation of the SeaShore Transportation Forum
as the West foram for local governments to share information, build consensus, and coordinate among
jurisdictions and agencies with the goal of providing advice on plans, programs, policies and priorities
for regional transportation decisions.
2.0 Role of Subarea Transportation Boards
1. The SeaShore Transportation Forum is the forum established for the West subarea of King
County for elected officials to provide advice into the following decisions:
a. The King County Metro six year transit development plan, and implementation of
transit service priorities
b. Sound Transit plans and implementation of projects and services
2. The SeaShore Transportation Forum may also provide input on other countywide and regional
transportation issues.
3.. The three subarea transportation boards shall hold at least one joint meeting annually to
address issues of mutual interest and concern and promote regional decisions.
ra
3.0 Voting and Non -voting Members
3.1 The voting members of the Seashore Transportation Forum and their voting rights shall be as
follows:
Voting Members
Number
of Reps.
Voting Rights
Core Members
(jurisdictions within the
subarea boundary)
Sound
Transit I
Metro
Transit 2
Regional
Competition 3
Other 4
Other Project
Planning or
Resource
Allocation5
Lake Forest Park
2
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Shoreline
2
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
King County
3
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Seaftle
2
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Non -Core Members
(jurisdictions outside the
subarea boundary)
Bothell
2.
No
No
No
Yes
No
Kenmore
2
No
No
No
Yes
No
Woodinville
2
No
No
No
Yes
No
Edmonds
2
No
No
No
Yes
No
-Mountlake Terrace
2
No
No
No
Yes
No
Snohomish County
.i
1 No
No
No
Yes
No
1. Recommendations on Sound Transit capital and service plans and implementation
2. Recommendations on Metro.Transit service plans
3. Identification of projects for the regional competition, if prescribed by the process approved by the King County caucus of
the Transportation Policy Board
4. Other recommendations that do not relate to the planning or implementation of transportation projects or allocation of
funding resources, including:
• Recommendations to the PSRC on policies and programs that do not relate to the planning or implementation of specific
transportation projects or allocation of funding (such as Transportation 2040 alternatives, studies, analysis, Draft EIS,
draft plan and final plan; and regional' funding policies strategies or programs that do not relate to the financing of
specific projects).
• Input to the State Legislature, committees and commissions established by the Legislature on recommendations and
proposed legislation that do not relate to the planning or implementation of specific transportation projects or allocation
of funding (such as proposed transportation legislation, provided that the legislation does not relate to the financing of
specific projects; Joint Transportation Commission studies; and State Transportation Commission policies).
• Recommendations to WSDOT on policies and programs that do not relate to the planning or implementation of specific
transportation projects or allocation of funding (such as WSDOT long range transportation plans and policies; Active
Traffic Management and other operational programs and policies).
r Recommendations to the federal delegation on federal legislation that does not relate to the planning or implementation
of specific transportation projects or allocation of funding (such as federal legislation including reauthorization, provided
that the legislation does not. relate to the financing of specific projects).
5. Other recommendations that do relate to the planning and implementation of transportation projects or the allocation of
funding resources; including:
• Recommendations to the PSRC on policies and programs that do relate to the planning or implementation of specific
transportation projects or allocation of funding (such as Transportation 2040 project priorities and funding; regional
competitive process funding criteria; projects for the regional competition).
• Input to the State Legislature, committees and commissions established by the Legislature on IegisIation that relates to
the planning or implementation of specific transportation projects or allocation of funding (such as proposed
transportation budget and actions to implement tolls).
• Recommendations to WSDOT on policies and programs that relate to the planning or implementation of specific
transportation projects or allocation of funding (such as WSDOT corridor project priorities and funding and project
implementation).
• Recommendations to the federal delegation on federal legislation that relates to the planning or implementation of
specific transportation projects or allocation of funding (such as federal earmarks for specific projects).
12 The non-votinn members of SeaShore shall be as follows:
Non -Voting Member
Number of Representatives
Sound Transit
1
'PSRC
1
WSDOT
1
TM
I
Community Transit
I
Port of Seattle
I
Washington State Transportation Commission
I
3.3 With a simple majority of voting members as shown in Section 3.1 on each specific issue, the
SeaShore Transportation Forum can.adopt resolutions, authorize correspondence, request information,
or provide other advisory input to member jurisdictions or regional and state activities.
4.0 Representation and Conduct
4.1 The representation on the SeaShore Transportation Forum shall be as follows:
1. Elected officials appointed for a one-year term from each of the participating counties and cities,
in the number specified above. King County representation shall be a maximum of two
Councilmembers and the King County Executive or his designee. Snohomish County
representation shall be the Snohomish County Executive or his designee.
.2. High level staff from WSDOT, Community Transit, the Port of Seattle and the PSRC; a West
King subarea board member of Sound Transit; the Director of the TIB; and a representative
designated by the Washington Transportation Commission.
4.2 Each participating member shall appoint an alternate. Designated alternates may vote in place of
designated voting representatives in the absence of the designated representative.
4.3 On an annual'basis, member jurisdictions shall inform the Lead Agency in writing of its
representatives and alternates and provide the appropriate contact information for each.
4.4 The SeaShore Transportation Forum will be responsible for overall program direction, approving
recommendations and providing direction for advisory input on transportation decisions.
4.5 The SeaShore Transportation Forum may establish its own bylaws and rules of procedures and
may modify these as appropriate. Such bylaws and rules shall be consistent with the provisions of this
Agreement and modifications to such bylaws and rules will.not alter this Agreement.
4.6 The SeaShore Transportation Forum may establish subcommittees as it determines appropriate.
A subcommittee of the Non -Core members shall be established to address issues of specific concern to
those members. The subcommittee may provide information to the Forum and make recommendations.
Voting and action on subcommittee -recommendations shall follow the guidelines in Section 3.1.
4.7 Any voting member may request that a minority statement be included in communications or
otherwise distributed with the adopted majority position.
Cl
5.0 Chair and Vice Chair
5.1 The chair and vice chair of the Seashore Transportation Forum shall be representatives of a core
member jurisdiction. The chair and vice chair shall be elected by a majority of the core member
jurisdictions.
5.2 The chair and vice chair shall be nominated by a nominating committee which shall be
established in. November of each year. Nominations for chair and vice chair shall be made in December
of each year.
5.3 The chair and vice chair shall serve a term of one year from February 1 through January 31 of
the following year.
5.4 The chair and the vice chair shall conduct the SeaShore Transportation Forum activities within
adopted procedures and guidelines. The chair and vice chair are responsible for setting meeting
agendas, ensuring fair opportunity for. discussion, signing correspondence, and speaking on behalf of the
SeaShore Transportation Forum.
6.0 Technical Advisory Committee (TAC)
6.1 Each member jurisdiction or agency shall appoint at least one planning, public works and/or
intergovernmental staff person to the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC). Each member jurisdiction
and agency is expected to contribute such staff as is necessary to accomplish the work program adopted
by the SeaShore Transportation Forum.
6.2 The TAC shall provide technical assistance as requested by the SeaShore Transportation Forum
and shall advise the SeaShore Transportation Forum and their respective members on emergent
transportation issues. The TAC shall also be responsible for overall program development including
draffing of the work program. The TAC shall also review studies, and coordinate its activities with -
adjacent jurisdictions, including the other subarea transportation forums.
6.3 When appropriate, the TAC will make recommendations for consideration of the SeaShore
Transportation Forum. The TAC's recommendations shall be determined by consensus of a majority of
the TAC members present. If the Technical Advisory Committee is unable to reach consensus on. a
particular issue, TAC members may present discussion questions or a dissenting opinion to the SeaShore
Transportation Forum for consideration.
7.0 Lead Agency
7.1 King County will be the Lead Agency for the purposes of receipt of funds,* contract
administration, and disbursement of funds. King County shall appoint a staff member to serve as Project
Manager for special projects. King County shall also provide general administrative and program
support for the SeaShore Transportation Forum. King County assumes wage and benefits cost of its
staff performing Lead Agency responsibilities. .
7.2 Lead Agency responsibilities include administrative and technical support for meetings and
ongoing operations; collection, administration and distribution of dues; support to the chair and vice
chair; preparation of correspondence and other materials; development and monitoring of work program;
and coordination of special projects as directed by the SeaShore Transportation Forum.
E
8.0 Annual Work Program
The Seashore Transportation Forum may undertake activities consistent with its purposes and shall
prepare an annual progress report and work program for the following year for submittal to its members.
9.0 Financing and Cost Sharing Guidelines
9.1 Yearly Dues -- Each core member city will contribute $100.00 annually per vote awarded to
remain members in good standing. The designated Lead Agency shall not be required to pay yearly
dues. Non -core jurisdictions will not be required to pay annual dues. Revenue from dues shall be used
for special events, including an annual joint meeting of the subarea transportation boards, public
education, or other expenses authorized by the SeaShore Transportation Forum.
9.2 The following guidelines shall generally apply:
1. Annual Review of Financing: The SeaShore Transportation Forum shall determine by June 30
of each year whether an additional financial contribution will be requested of the SeaShore
Transportation Forum jurisdictions.
2. Voting Members: If additional financial contributions are determined to be necessary, costs shall
be shared among member jurisdictions other than King County by a method as determined by
action of the SeaShore Transportation Forum. Unless agreed to otherwise, King County's share
shall be limited to the costs of providing staff support.
3. Non -voting Members: These member agencies shall not be expected to make a direct funding
contribution.
4. Modification to Agreement Required: A modification to this agreement specifying cost -sharing,
purpose, scope of work and other details is required in order to obligate a member jurisdiction to
funding participation.
10.0 Withdrawal of a Party from this Agreement
Each party, for its convenience and without cause or for any reason whatsoever, may withdraw from
participation in this Agreement by providing written notice, sent certified mail, return receipt required,
to all of the other parties at least thirty (30) days in advance of the effective date of the withdrawal. A
withdrawing party shall not be entitled to a refund of any payments to SeaShore Transportation Forum
and shall make any contributions required to be paid to other parties under this Agreement for costs
which had been obligated prior to the effective date of the withdrawal. In the event a party withdraws,
the remaining parties shall amend this Agreement as necessary to reflect changes in the named parties
and cost and revenue allocations. In the event of withdrawal by a party, this Agreement shall terminate
as to that party but shall continue in effect with respect.to the remaining parties. However, the
termination of this Agreement with respect to one or more parties shall not affect any of the parties'
rights or obligations, including any rights or obligations of a withdrawing party, that are expressly
intended to survive termination.
Each party's funding to perform its obligations under the Agreement, beyond the current appropriation
year, is conditional upon appropriation by the party's governing body of sufficient funds to support said
obligations. Should such an appropriation not be approved for a future year, a party may exercise its
right to withdraw as provided herein.
11.0 Duration
R
This Agreement shall take effect upon being duly adopted by the governing bodies of all parties and
executed by the authorized representatives of all parties. This Agreement shall remain in effect until all
the tasks have been completed to the satisfaction of the SeaShore Transportation Porum or until such
time as the participating members choose to conclude the program for other reasons, but in no case shall
the program extend beyond December 31, 2012, unless terminated earlier or extended in accordance
with Section 11.0 or 12.0. If all parties desire to extend this Agreement beyond December 31, 2012,
they shall execute a Statement of Extension. In no event shall the Agreement be extended beyond
December 31, 2014.
12.0 Termination
All parties to this Agreement must agree to terminate this Agreement in order for such termination to be
effective. If all parties desire to terminate this Agreement, they shall execute a Statement of
Termination. Upon termination, no party shall be required to make any additional contributions. Any
remaining funds shall be refunded to the parties to this Agreement according to Section 14.0.
13.0 Real and Personal Property
The acquisition of real property is not anticipated under this Agreement. Any personal property
acquired pursuant to this Agreement shall be held by the Lead Agency. In the event this Agreement
expires or is terminated in accordance with Section 11.0 or 12.0, any personal property other than cash
shall remain with the Lead Agency.
14.0 Return of Funds
At such time as this Agreement expires or is terminated in accordance with Section 11.0, any
unexpended and uncommitted funds shall be distributed proportionately to those parties to this
Agreement at the time of termination based on each party's percentage share of the original contribution.
15.0 Filing
This Agreement shall be filed with the King County Department of Records and Elections.
16.0 Legal Relations
16.1 The parties shall comply with all applicable state and federal laws and regulations.
16.2 This Agreement is solely for the benefit of the parties hereto and gives no right to any other
party. No joint venture or partnership is formed as a result of this Agreement. No employees or agents
of one party or any of its contractors or subcontractors shall be deemed, or represent themselves to be,
employees of any other party.
16.3 Each party shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the other party and all of its officials,
employees, principals and agents from all claims, demands, suits, actions, and liability of any kind
whatsoever which arise out of, are connected with, or are incident to any negligent acts of the first party,
its contractor, and/or employees, agents, and representatives in performing the first party's obligations
under this Agreement. The parties agree that their obligations under this paragraph extend to claims
made against one party by the other party's own employees. For this purpose, the parties, by mutual
negotiation, hereby waive any immunity that, as respects the other party only, would otherwise be
available against such claims under the industrial insurance provisions of RCW Title 51. In the event
7
either party incurs attorney's fees, costs or other legal expenses to enforce the provisions of this section,
against the other party, all such fees, costs and expenses shall be recoverable by the prevailing party.
16.4 The provisions of this Section 16 shall survive and remain applicable to each of the parties
notwithstanding any termination or expiration of this Agreement and notwithstanding a party's
withdrawal from this Agreement.
17.0 Entirety and Modifications
17.1 This Agreement merges and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations and agreements
between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof and constitutes the entire agreement between the
parties.
17.2 This Agreement may be modified or extended only by written instrument signed by all the
parties hereto.
18.0 Counterparts
The signature pages of this Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which
shall be an original. .
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have caused this Agreement to be signed and delivered by its duly authorized officer
or representative as of the date set forth below its signature.
N.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have caused this Agreement to be signed and delivered by its duly authorized officer
or representative as of the date set forth below its signature.
City of Bothell
City of Edmonds
City of Kenmore
By:
By:
By:
Date: v O
Date:
Date:
City of Lake Forest Park
City of Mountlake Terrace
City of Seattle
By:
By:
By:
Date:
Date:
Date:
City of Shoreline
City of Woodinville
Community Transit
By:
By:
By:
Date:
Date:
Date:
King County
Port of Seattle
Puget Sound Regional Council
By:
By:
By:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Snohomish County
Sound Transit
Transportation Improvement Board
By:
By:
By:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Washington State Department of
Washington State Transportation
Transportation
Commission
By:
By.
Date:
Date:
Z
City of Bothell
City of Edmonds
City of Kenmore
By:
By:
By:.
Date:
Date: 1 L
Date:
City of Lake Forest Park
City of Mountlake Terrace
City of Seattle
By:
By:
By:
Dote:
Date:
Date:
City of Shoreline.
City of Woodinville
Community Transit
By:
By:
By:
Date:
Date:
Date:
King County
Port of Seattle
Puget Sound Regional Council
By:
By:
By:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Snohomish County
Sound Transit
Transportation Improvement Board
By:
By:
By:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Washington State Department of
Washington State Transportation
Transportation
Coinmission
By:
By:
Date:
Date:
City of Bothell
City of Edmonds
City of Kenmore
By:
By:
By:
Date:
Date:
Date:
City of Lake Forest Park
City of Mountlake Terrace
City of Seattle
By:
By:
By:
Date:
Date:
Date:
City of Shoreline
City of Woodinville
Community Transit
By:
By:
By:
Date:
Date:
Date:
King County
Port of Seattle
Puget Sound Regional Council
By:
By:
By:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Snohomish County
Sound Transit
Transportation Improvement Board
By:
By:
By:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Washington State Department of
Washington State Transportation
Transportation
Commission
By;
By:
Date:
Date:
City of Bothell
City of Edmonds
City of Kenmore
By.
By:
By:'
Date:
Date:
Date:
City of Le Forest
City City of Mountlake Terrace
City of Seattle
By %WOW
By: •
By:
Date: f . Q
Date:
Date:
City of Shoreline
City of Woodinville
Community Transit
By:
By:
By:
Date:
Date:
Date:
King County.
Port of Seattle
Puget Sound Regional Council
By:
By:
By:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Snohomish County
Sound Transit
Transportation Improvement Board
By:
By:
By:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Washington State Department of
Washington State Transportation
Transportation
Commission
By:
By:
Date:
Date:
6
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have caused this Agreement to be signed and delivered by its duly authorized officer
or representative as of the date set forth below its signature.
City of Bothell.
City of Edmonds
City of Kenmore
By.
By:
By:
Date:
Date:
Date:
City of Lake Forest Park
City of MoWerr
City of Seattle
By:
By:By:
Date:
Date
Date:
Cityof Shoreline
City of Woodinville
Community Transit
By:
By:
By:
Date:
Date:
Date:
King County
Port of Seattle.
Puget Sound Regional Council
By:
By:
By:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Snohomish County
Sound Transit
Transportation Improvement Board
By:
By:
By:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Washington State Department of
Washington State Transportation .
Transportation
Commission
By:
By:
Date:
Date:
6
18.0 Counterparts
The signature pages of this Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of
which shall be an original.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have caused this Agreement to be signed and delivered by its duly authorized
officer or representative as of the date set forth below its signature.
City of Bothell
City of Edmonds
City of Kenmore
By:
By:
By:
Date:
Date:
Date:
City of Lake Forest Park
City of Mountlake Terrace
City of. Seattle
By:
By:
By.-&"�
Date:
Date:
Date: 12 N
City of Shoreline
City of Woodinville
Community Transit
By:
By:
By:
Date:
Date:
Date:
King County
Port of Seattle
Puget Sound Regional Council
By:
By:
By:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Snohomish County
Sound Transit
Transportation Improvement Board
...By:
By:
By:
.Date:
Date:
Date:
Washington State Department of
Washington State Transportation
Transportation
Commission
By:
By:
Date:
Date:
City of Bothell
City of Edmonds
City of Kenmore
By:
By:
By:
Date:
Date:
Date:
City of Lake Forest Park
City of Mountlake Terrace
City of Seattle.
By.
By:
By:
Date:
Date:
Date:
City of Shoreline
City of Woodinville
Community Transit
By:
By:
By:
Date:
Date:
Date:
King County
Port of Seattle
Puget Sound Regional Council
By:
By:
By:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Snohomish County
Sound Transit
Transportation Improvement Board
By:
By:
By:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Washington State Department of
Washington State Transportation
Transportation
Commission
By:
By:
Date:
Date:
0
City of Bothell
City of Edmonds
City of Kenmore
By:
By:
By:
Date:
Date:
Date. -
City of Lake Forest Park
City of Mountlake Terrace
City of Seattle
By:
By:
By:
Date:
Date:
Date:
City of Shoreline
City of Wood' He
Community Transit
By:
By
By
Date:
Date: 1-'3- ID
Date-
King County
Port of Seattle
Puget Sound Regional Council
By:
By:
By:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Snohomish County
Sound Transit
Transportation Improvement Board
By:
By:
By:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Washington State Department of
Washington State Transportation
Transportation
Commission
By:
By:
Date:
Date:
L9
City of Bothell
City of Edmonds
City of Kenmore
By:
By:
By:
Date:
Date:
Date:
City of Lake Forest Park
City of Mountlake Terrace
City of Seattle
By:
By:
By:
Date:
Date:
Date:
City of Shoreline
City of Woodinville
Community Transit
By:
By:
KI iA.
Date:
Date:
Date:
King County
Port of Seattle
Puget Sound Regional Council .
By:
By:
By:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Snohomish County
Sound Transit
Transportation Improvement Board
By:
By:
By:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Washington State Department of
Washington State Transportation
Transportation
Commission
By:
By:
Date:
Date:
--------------
9
City of Bothell
City of Edmonds
City of Kenmore
By:
By:
By:
Date:
Date:
Date:
City of Lake Forest Park
City of Mountlake Terrace
City of Seattle
By:
By:
By:
Date:
Date:
Date-
City of Shoreline
City of Woodinville
Community Transit
By:
By:
By:
Date:
Date:
Date:
King County
Port of Seattle
Puget Sound Regional Council
By:
By:
By:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Snohomish County
Sound Transit
Transportation Improvement Board
By:
By:
By:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Washington State Department of
Washington State Transportation
Transportation
Commission
By:
By:
Date:
Date:
9
City of Bothell
City of Edmonds
City of Kenmore
By:
By:
By:
Date:
-Date:
Date:
City of Lake Forest Park
City of Mountlake Terrace
City of Seattle
By:
By:
By:
Date:
Date:
Date:
City of Shoreline
City of Woodinville
Community Transit
By
By:
By:
Date:
Date:
Date:
King County
Port of Seattle
Puget Sound Regional Council
By:
By: ��_ r
By:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Snohomish County
Sound Transit
Transportation Improvement Board
By:
By:
By:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Washington State Department of
Washington State Transportation
Transportation
Commission
By:
By:
Date:
Date-
E
City of Bothell
City of Edmonds
City of Kenmore
By:
By:
By:
Date:
Date:
Date:
City of Lake Forest Park
City of Mountlake Terrace
City of Seattle
By:
By:
By:
Date:
Date.,
Date:
City of Shoreline
City of Woodinville
Community Transit
By:
By:
By:
Date:
Date:
Date:
King County
Port of Seattle
Puget Sound Regional uncil
By:
By:
By:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Snohomish County
Sound Transit
Transportation Improvement Board
By:
By:
By:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Washington State Department of
Washington State Transportation
Transportation
Commission
By.
By:
Date:
Date: .
0
City of Bothell
City of Edmonds
City of Kenmore
By:
By:
By:
Date:
Date:
Date:
City of Lake Forest Park
City of Mountlake Terrace
City of Seattle
By:
By:
By:
Date:
Date:
Date:
City of Shoreline
City of Woodinville
Community Transit
By:
By:
By:
Date:
Date:
Date:
King County
Port of Seattle
Puget Sound Regional Council
By:
By:
By:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Snohomish Coun
Sound Transit
Transportation Improvement Board
By: A
P By:
By:
Date: v
'rec
Date:
Date:
r
Washington State Depa nt of
Washington State Transportation
Transportation
Commission
By:
By:
Date:
Date:
3p oved as to
Deputy -'rosecutit Q ttorney
N
City of Bothell
City of Edmonds
City of Kenmore
By:
By:
By:
Date:
Date:
Date:
City of Lake Forest Park
City of Mountlake Terrace
City of Seattle
By:
By:
By:
Date:
Date:
Date:
City of Shoreline
City of Woodinville
Community Transit
By:
By:
By:
Date:
Date:
Date:
King County
Port of Seattle
Puget Sound Regional Council
By:
By:
By:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Snohomish County
Sound Trans*
Transportation Improvement Board
By:.
By:
By:
Date:
Date: I D
Date:
Washington State Department of
Washington State Transportation
Transportation
Commission
By:
By:
Date:
Date:
6
City of Bothell
City of Edmonds
City of Kenmore
By:
By:
By:
Date:
Date:
Date-
City of Lake Forest Park
City of Mountlake Terrace
City of Seattle
By:
By:
By:
Date:
Date:
Date:
City of Shoreline
City of WoodinviIIe
Community Transit
By:
By:
By:
Date:
Date:
Date:
King County
Port of Seattle
Puget Sound Regional Council
By:
By:
By:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Snohomish County
Sound Transit
Transportati n Im rove nt
By:
By:
By:
Date:
Date:
Date: to
Washington State Department of
Washington State Transportation
Transportation
Commission
By:
By:
Date:
Date:
0
City of Bothell
City of Edmonds
City of Kenmore
By:
By:
By:
Date:
Date:
Date:
City of Lake Forest Park
City of Mountlake Terrace
City of Seattle
By:
By:
By:
Date:
Date:
Date:
City of Shoreline
City of Woodinville
Community Transit
By:
By:
By:
Date:
Date:
Date:
King County
Port of Seattle
Puget Sound Regional Council
By:
By:
By:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Snohomish County
Sound Transit
Transportation Improvement Board
By:
By:
By:
Date:
Date:
Date:.
Washington State Department of
Washington State Transportation
Transportatio
Commission
By.
By:
Date: /Z.&4V
Date:
9
City of Bothell
City of Edmonds
City of Kenmore
By:
By:
By:
Date:
Date:
Date:
City of Lake Forest Park
City of Mountlake Terrace
City of Seattle
By:
By:
By:
Date:
Date:
Date. -
City of Shoreline
City of Woodinville
Community Transit
By:
By:
By:
Date:
Date:
Date:
King County
Port of Seattle
Puget Sound Regional Council
By:
By:
By:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Snohomish County
Sound Transit
Transportation improvement Board
By:
By:
By:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Washington State Department of
Washington State Transportation
Transportation
Commiss n
By:
By
Date:
Date:
7
KING COUNTY 1200 King County Courthouse
516 Third Avenue
Seattle, WA 98104
Signature Report
Ity
July 6, 2010
Ordinance 16871
Proposed No. 2010-0343.1 Sponsors Ferguson and Phillips
1 AN ORDINANCE relating to the SeaShore Transportation
2 Forum authorizing the executive to enter into an agreement
3 for its continuation and committing to King County staff
4 support through 2012.
5 STATEMENT OF FACTS:
6 1. King County and the cities in King County have a long history of
7 multijurisdictional transportation planning and have found that benefits
8 can be achieved by multijurisdictional coordination, including a
9 cooperative approach to planning, financing, and construction of needed
10 transportation improvements.
11 2. The King County Public Transportation Long Range Policy
12 Framework, adopted in 1993, divided Metro transit service into three
13 geographic subareas for the purpose of allocating new transit service
14 subsidy, and the Six -Year Transit Development Plan, adopted in 2002,
15 calls for the three subarea transportation boards, the Eastside
16 Transportation Partnership, the South County Area Transportation Board
17 and the SeaShore Transportation Forum, to review, to refine and to
18 recommend service priorities. to the King County executive.
Ordinance 16871
19 3. The Seashore Transportation Forum has functioned in this role for the
20 past fifteen years, providing input on various transportation projects and
21 policies.
22 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF KING COUNTY:
23 SECTION 1. King County approves the agreement in substantially the form
24 attached to this ordinance, for the SeaShore Transportation Forum. The agreement:
25 A. Commits to continued staff support for its continuation through 2012.
26 B. Confirms its responsibilities for King County, including providing policy
27 direction for the subarea on the following issues:
28 1. Development of the Six -Year Transit Development Plan;
29 2. Implementation of transit service priorities; and
30 3. Additional transportation recommendations called for by the board.
31 C. Acknowledges that Sound Transit considers the SeaShore Transportation
32 Forum and other subarea transportation boards as information sharing forums for Sound
33 Transit and specifically requires consideration of subarea board approval of changes to
34 the Sound Move Plan as one of six criteria in making a determination about changes.
35 D. Acknowledges that other transportation agencies may use their boards as tools
36 for sharing information and gathering input.
37 E. Allows for the consideration of additional transportation issues as determined
38 by SeaShore Transportation Forum; and
M
Ordinance 16871
39 F. Authorizes the executive to enter into this agreement to further the purpose of
40 this board.
41
Ordinance 16871 was introduced on 6/14/2010 and passed by the Metropolitan King
County Council on 7/6/2010, by the following vote:
Yes: 9 - Ms. Drago, Mr. Phillips, Mr. von Reichbauer, Mr. Gossett,
Ms. Hague, Ms. Patterson, Ms. Lambert, Mr. Ferguson and Mr. Dunn
No: 0
Excused: 0
KING COUNTY COUNCIL
KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON
Robert W. Ferguson, Chair
ATTEST:
Anne Noris, Clerk of the Council v
APPROVED this day ofJtA
�2010.
�
00,
v
Dow Constantine, County Executive
Attachments: A. Seashore Transportation Forum--2009-2012 Agreement
3