The URL can be used to link to this page

CRA19980102IIII��I�I CA FILE NO. q j U Z- Critical Areas Checklist 6QP- / 19 goloz- -------------------------------------------------------------- Site Information (soils/topography/hydrology/vegetation) Site Address/Location: 2. Property Tax Account Number: ,P5-, 703-'�/-7/U6u4, 3. Approximate Site Size (acres or square feet): j 14, Y �� V 4. Is this site currently developed? yes; X no. If yes; how is site developed? 5. Describe the general site topography. Check all that apply. Flat: less than 5-feet elevation change over entire site. ,-25.?7u51%?o /7,jaaX Rolling: slopes on site generally less than 15% (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of 66-feet). Hilly: slopes present on site of more than 15% and less than 30% ( a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of 33 to 66-feet). Steep: grades of greater than 30% present on site (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of less than 33-feet). Other (please describe): 3Netlan' d mveniory or C A map md�cafes wetland present ontte�l 4rttzcalAreas: lriventory or C A map uodieates CriticaA l rea on situ 5' Site wttfiin designated earth subsidedce IandsTide hazard area? b Site designated o thenvironrnentall Sensitive Areas lea }� .. P DETERMINATION RECEIVED City of Edmonds MAR 31 1998 COMMUNITY SEWIGES "k,W CRITICAL AREAS CHECKLIST The Critical Areas Checklist contained on this form is to be filled out by any person preparing a Development Permit Application for the City of Edmonds prior to his/her submittal of a development permit to the City. The purpose of the Checklist is to enable City staff to determine whether any potential Critical Areas are, or may be, present on the subject property. The information needed to complete the Checklist should be easily available from observations of the site or data available at City Hall (Critical Areas inventories, maps, or soil surveys). An applicant, or his/her representative, must fill out the checklist, sign and date it, and submit it to the City. The City will review the checklist, make a precursory site visit, and make a determination of the subsequent steps necessary to complete a development permit application. Please submit a vicinity map along with the signed copy of this form to assist City staff in finding and locating the specific piece of property described on this form. In addition, the applicant shall include other pertinent information (e.g., site plan, topography map, etc.) or studies in conjunction with this Checklist to assist staff in completing their preliminary assessment of the site I have completed the attached Critical Areas Checklist and attest that the answers provided are factual, to the best of my knowledge (fill out the appropriate column below). Owner/Applicant: a✓Ln.� Name Street Address City State Zip Telephone Signature Applicant Representative: Name Street Address City State/Zip c�S -77 R >eeS- Telephone Signature �,3 // cl� Date c:receptionljanakaddoc Date (over) City of Edmonds Critical Areas Determination Applicant: Shaw Determination #: CA-98-101 c/o Terry Vehrs CA-98-102 Project Name: Permit Number: Site Location: Northeast corner of Property Tax Acct #: 2527-032-171-0006 8`h Ave S & Pine St. 2527-032-1-79-0004 t Project Description non -project specific A site inspection has revealed a site with standing water, dark soil and hydric plants. Based on the above findings, it is determined that there is potentially a wetland critical area on or adjacent to the site. A Critical Areas Study is required to delineate the boundaries of the critical areas, the buffers and setbacks. A wetland biologist must identify and mark the boundaries of the wetland, and a licensed surveyor must create a topographic map of the site which indicates the location of the critical area as identified by the biologist, and identifies the all buffers and setbacks. All studies must be completed through a three party contract according to the requirements found in ECDC section 20.15B. If the property owner wishes to apply for a specific development permit which they feel would not impact the Critical Areas located on or adjacent to the site, they may submit their proposal to the Planning Department for review. If the Planning Department finds that the proposed development permit will not adversely impact a Critical Area or its buffers, a conditional waiver may be issued on a project by project basis. John Bissell Name "t�z� Sig atur April 16, 1998 Date , t _w_ww._peiitecenv.'coni PENTCC L•NWRONMWT/.IL Delivering smarter solutions June 2, 2000 Anchorage Mr. and Mrs. Clifford Shaw 1515 - l Oth Place N Edmonds, WA 98020 Boston Re: Evaluation of Wetland Delineation 8t' Avenue South and Pine Street, Edmonds, Washington P-473-001 Dear Cliff and Betty: Chicago At your request, Pentec Environmental (Pentec) conducted a site reconnaissance and reviewed a wetland delineation report prepared by Pacific International Engineering (PIE), dated May 14, 1999, for your property. The site comprises approximately 1.25 acres located t?enver at the northeastern corner of 8th Avenue South and Pine Street in Edmonds, Washington (northwest 1/4, Section 25, Township 27N, Range 3E). The methods used during Pentec's reconnaissance, the results of that investigation, and our evaluation of the PIE report are. summarized in this report. Fairbanks Methods The Routine Determinations wetland delineation method described in the Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual was used by Pentec to determine if Jersey City jurisdictional wetlands exist on the site and to evaluate the PIE report. This manual was developed as mandated by state law to be consistent with the US Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) 1987 Manual. It has been adopted into state regulations, and all state and local governments must use this delineation manual to implement the state Shoreline Management Juneau Act and local wetlands regulations developed to comply with the Growth Management Act. The PIE report states that they used the Washington state manual but does not provide the specific delineation method used. An area is a jurisdictional wetland when hydrophytic (wetland) vegetation, hydric (wetland) Long Beach soils, and wetland hydrology are present. With few exceptions, all three parameters are required for an area to be a jurisdictional wetland. In this investigation, presence of hydrophytic vegetation and hydric soils within 12 inches of the soil surface were the primary criteria used to identify wetlands. Hydrophytic vegetation was considered to be present if Portland more than 50 percent of the dominant plants in an area had wetland indicator statuses of FAC, FACW, or OBL, as defined by Reed (1988) and Reed et al. (1993) (Table 1). A Division of Hart Crowser, Inc. Seattle 120 Third Avenue South, Suite 110 Edmonds, Washington 98020-8411 Fax 425.778.9417 Tel 425.775.4682 Mr. and Mrs. Clifford Shaw June 2, 2000 Table 1 Key to wetland indicator status. P-473-001 Page 2 Code Wetland Indicator Status Probability of Occurrence in Wetland OBL Obligate wetland species > 99 percent FACW Facultative wet 67 to 99 percent FAC Facultative 34 to 66 percent FACU Facultative upland 1 to 33 percent UPL Obligate upland < 1 percent Notes: + A plus (+) sign or minus (-) sign is used with the facultative indicator categories to more specifically define the regional frequency of occurrence in wetlands. The + indicates a more frequent occurrence. * An asterisk (*) identifies a tentative assignment based on limited information. NI Indicates that a species has not been assigned an indicator status. An indicator status in lower case (e.g., facu) denotes that no indicator status has been published, but one has been assigned based on local field experience. In addition to digging soil pits at the two sample plots, Pentec used a hand auger to investigate soils to a depth of about 15 inches beneath the ground surface. Positive indicators of hydric soils include high organic content, dark soil colors, mottling, and sulfide or rotten egg odors. Soil colors are designated according to the Munsell® Soil Color Charts. These include color names and, in order, notations for the three dimensions of color: hue, value, and chroma. Saturation, evidence of inundation, and presence of hydric soils and hydrophytic vegetation were used as positive indicators of wetland hydrology. Delineated wetland boundaries were flagged with a combination of sequentially numbered, yellow pin flags and pink "Wetland Boundary" flagging. Two sample plots were established on the site and marked with orange flagging tape. The first plot (SP-1) was located in the central portion of the wetland toward the western side of the property. The second sample plot (SP-2) was established in upland just east of the wetland boundary, about midway between the northern and southern property boundaries. Our field data sheets are attached. Results It appears that the PIE report and delineation of wetlands on your property is reasonable and consistent with our own observations of conditions on'the site. This conclusion is based on direct observation of soils, hydrology, and vegetation. Hydric, mineral soils in the area shown as wetland in the PIE report are black or very dark gray and are either inundated or Mr. and Mrs. Clifford Shaw June 2, 2000 P-473-001 Page 3 saturated within 10 inches of the surface. In addition, portions of the area shown as wetland in the PIE report contain peat (hydric organic) soils. The hydrologic conditions observed in late May, as well as the appearance of the soils, are clear indicators of wetlands. Himalayan blackberry (Rubus discolor, FACU), which has overgrown the site, is not considered a wetland species, but it commonly grows in wetlands in western Washington. Most of the other plants found on the site, including red alder (Alnus rubra, FAC), salmonberry (Rubus spectabilis, FAC+), willows (Salix spp., FACW-, FACW+), black cottonwood (Populus balsamifera ssp. trichocarpa, FAC), and skunk cabbage (Lysichiton americanus, OBL) are wetland indicator species. Regulatory Implications Wetland Classification and Buffer and Setback Requirements The PIE report appears to be correct in classifying the wetland on your property as Category 3, which requires a 25-ft buffer and a 15-ft building setback fiom the edge of the buffer according to the Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC 20.15B.060, 20.15B.080, and 20.15B.130.C, revised January 2000).- Confirmation of Delineated Wetland Boundaries Before proceeding with detailed site planning, Pentec recommends that you request a site confirmation visit by the Corps and the City of Edmonds in order to verify the wetland boundaries delineated by PIE. Based on our analysis of the PIE report and our own investigation of the site, Pentec will be able to address any questions that the Corps or City may have regarding the delineated wetland boundary. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at (425) 775-4682. Sincerely, PENTEC ENVIRONMENTAL '6.. [ 1Ga KICHARD K. ROBOHM Wetland Ecologist richard@pentecenv.com Attachment: Field data Sheets 00473\001 \shawwetde1_I.d0C DATA FORM 1 Routine Wetland Determination (WA State Wetland Delineation Manual or 1987 Corps Wetland Delineation Manual) Project/Site: J�/laJ G',45 �t �- Pl n� Date:/B�QQ Applicant/owner: G lid County: S/-vh(" Mi% A State: c j J4 Investisator(s): ✓✓Vella) ctscur; raj=haJ be ' SIT/R: Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? es) no Community ID:' ScrK�i shrech Is the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation)? yes Transect ID: Is the area a potential Problem Area? ves Plot ID: VEGETATION Dominant Plant Soecies Stratum Indicator Dominant Jinant Plant Species Stratton Indicator !M L i X 5)4A eii 514 75% S r;W7�f yr 1q M_A! -&i,1a 14, Fig her. �- �� us .�n,�.•��a11, �/ 5 �i4G� �xu�s��+n1 ��_rr�r � " no %� � ct�l �iCC J/L 1��a S J F)4,1kj4 HYDROP=C VEGETATION INDICATORS: % of dominants OBL, FACW, & FAC: 6 Check all indicators that apply & explain below: Regional knowledge of plant communities Wetland plant list (nat' 1 or regional) OTHER Physiological or reproductive adaptations Morphological adaptations Technical Literature Wetland Plant Data Base Hydrophytic vegetation present? no Rationale for decision/Remarks: HYDROLOGY Is it the growing season? no Water Marks: es no Sediment Deposits: yes Based on 16ct 1 • SCS ,e 5-&,r,,e Drift Lines: es o Drainage Patterns: es o Dept. of inundation: Ainches Oxidized Root (live roots) Local Soil Survey: yes no Channels <12 in. yes Depth to free water in pit: inches FAC Neutral: yes no Water -stained Leaves: yes no Depth to saturated soil: S14a« inches Check all that apply & explain below: Other. Stream, Lake or gave data: Aerial hotosraohs: Other: Wetland hydrology present? yes no Rationale for decision/Remarks: Drainasze Class ` Map unit Name Q er e ruye/f y $rnsx /aura (Series & Phase) Taxonomv (sub -rout)) Field observations confirm . Yes 0 ) Profile Description 1 Depth Horizon Matrix color Mottle colors Mottle abundance Texture, concretions. Drawing of soil (inches) (Munsell (Munsell size & contrast s.aucture,.etc. profile moist) moist) (match description) 0�� n lUYP- made- Hydric Soil Indicators: (check all that apply) &-'Histosol Concretions Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils _4!!:�',Sulfldic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List y Gleved or Low-Chroma Colors Other (explain in remarks) Hydric soils present? <19) no Rationale for decision/Remarks: i( g dar�(4Lce- Vo a -I- Aeasf�'- Wetland Determination (circle) Hydrophytic vegetation present? es no Hydric soils present? no Is the sampling point yes no Wetland hvdrolo resent? no within a wetland? Rationale/Remarks: NOTES: n � DATA FORM 1 Routine Wetland Determination (WA State Wetland Delineation Manual or 1987 Corps Wetland Delineation Manual) Dater Project/Site: .Sh.-W '4� / � � .� ) n tc Applicant/owner: C /Jg County:i?v State: yr Investisatoris): "711 1 Sccz d��?ic :� Sfr/R: Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? no Community ID: S �r�ch—��i r",b Is the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation)? yes ejEo Transect ID: Uplooz. Is the area a ootendal Problem Area? Yes Plot M: s VEGETATION Dominant PIant Soecies Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Soecies Stratum Indicator ub��5 c 6 doY, y o< �, 15� ir?�qs SIG �'i--- HYDROP=C VEGETATION INDICATORS: % of dominants OBL, FACW, & FAC: d /U Check all indicators that apply & explain below: Regional knowledge of plant communities Wetland plant list (nat'l or regional) OTHER Physiological or reproductive adaptations Morphological adaptations Technical Literature Wetland Plant Data Base Hydrophytic vegetation present? 45Ces�) no Rationale for decision/Remarks: HYDROLOGY Is it the growing season? no Water Marks: yes no Sediment Deposits: yes.L2 Based on: %acd o x5 y (Su uv- Drift Lines: es no Drainacre Patterns: yes tL� Dept. of inundation: ter/ inches Oxidized Root (live roots) Local Soil Survey: yes tro' Channels <12 in. yes ZCo Depth to free water in pit: o� inches FAC Neutral: yes no Water -stained Leaves: yes Depth to saturated soil: N inches - Check all that apply & explain below: Other: Stream, Lake or gave data: Aerial hotosraDhs: Other: Wetland hydrology present? yes o Rationale for decision/Remarks: de�w�.n �riv If( 61 D� t� 4UcSU% I D40 . 71r2z 'f' Drainaze Class ' Map Unit NameUec (Series & Phase)-� Taxonomv (subsrour)) Field observations confirm Yes fNo) Profile Description 1 Depth Horizon Matrix color Mottle colors Mottle abundance Texture, concretions. Drawing of soil (inches) (Munsell (Munsell size & contrast structure, etc.. profile moist) moist) (match description) /0-/lo w' 16Y23// /gam Hydric Soil Indicators: (check all that apply) Histosol Concretions Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils . Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List I,'Gleved or Low-Chroma Colors Other (explain in remarks) Hydric soils present? yes no rl Rationale for decision/Remarks: �s ct✓,tr f 1L��,,��6 �C�1a�A �f /?mac /n�Jcxx9�lun c�,� yeark- c eir )� — d ii?4� �✓{�- �J�G+''�du•//y d�<alh�� '�rc��ii. �c ct� aC�il� /`t'�c� � it�%J if �y 4��^.-�-, Wetland Determination (circle) Hydrophytic vegetation present? Cam' no Hydric soils present? � no Is the sampling point yes no Wetland hvdrolo resent? ves no within a wetland? Rationale/Remarks: l we-f /�ac8 %t ac dlu�y C-Ir^5'/x7��i� el I� r / ca �'�y NOTES: June Williams 6 i� From: Richard Robohm Sent: Monday, May 22, 2000 5:28 PM To: 'Clifford Shaw' Subject: Results of site investigation - Shaw property Dear Cliff: I have reviewed the Pacific International Engineering (PIE) report of May 14, 1999, and spent several hours with a colleague hacking and tunneling through blackberries on your property. It is my best professional judgment that the wetland boundaries shown on the PIE report are reasonable and may even be conservative. I would not propose that we redelineate the wetlands in the hope of obtaining a different result. My conclusion is based on direct observation of soils and hydrology on the site. Mineral soils in the area shown as wetland in the PIE report are black or very dark gray and are either inundated or saturated within 10 inches of the surface Peat (organic) soils are also found in parts of the area shown as wetland in the report. These soils and hydrologic conditions at this time of year are clear indicators of wetland conditions. Himalayan blackberry, which has overgrown the site, is not considered a wetland species, but it commonly grows in wetlands in western Washington. The alder, salmonberry, willow, cottonwood, and other plant species that can still be found beneath the blackberry are wetland species. I will be sending you a letter later this week setting forth the results of the site visit and our assessment of the methods and conclusions of the PIE report. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns. Richard Richard K. Robohm Wetland Ecologist Pentec Environmental, Inc. (425) 775-4682; fax (425) 778-9417 richard@pentecenv.com http://www.pentecenv.com Pentec Project #12473-010 RECEIvE® MAY 14 1999 PLANNING DEPT. Critical Area Study 81" Avenue S. and Pine Property Prepared for: Cliff and Betty Shaw c/o Windermere Real Estate HKW, Inc. 19031 33rd Ave. W., Suite 200 Lynnwood, Washington 98036 Prepared by: Anthony Roth May 14, 1999 PACIFIC INTERNATIONAL ENGINEERING PLLC 310 WATERFRONT PARK BLDG • 144 RAILROAD AVENUE, • EDMONDS, WASHINGTON • 98020 Table of Contents Table of Contents 1. Introduction................................................................................. 1 2. Water Resources.......................................................................... 2 2.1 Introduction........................................................................ 2 2.2 Methodology...................................................................... 3 2.3 Investigation Results.......................................................... 6 2.4 Regulatory Implications................................................... 11 3. Bibliography.............................................................................. 12 Appendices A Data Sheets List of Figures 1 Vicinity Map................................................................................1 2 Water Resources Map..................................................................2 3 Soils Map.....................................................................................4 4 Wetland Interior...........................................................................8 5 Wetland area with fallen logs ...................................................... 9 6 Representation of height of Himalayan blackberry ...................10 List of Tables 1 USFWS Plant Indicator Status........................................................ 5 2 Wetland Functions and Values........................................................7 Critical Area Study i 8`h Avenue S. and Pine Property May 14, 1999 Introduction 1. Introduction The subject property is a vacant 1.25 acre site located at the northwest corner of 8`h Avenue S and Pine Street, in Edmonds, Washington (See Figure 1). A Critical Areas Determination performed by the City of Edmonds on April 16, 1998 found that the site contains a Critical Area in the form of a wetland, pursuant to Chapter 20.15B of the Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC). The purpose of this report is to present site -specific findings, including an analysis of the wetland on the site. ST 9a: Figure 1 Vicinity Map Critical Area Study 1 8th Avenue S. and Pine Property May 14, 1999 Water Resources 2. Water Resources 2.1 Introduction In October 1998, Pacific International Engineering staff performed on - site investigations to determine the presence, type and extent of water resources on the subject property. The primary objectives of the site evaluation were: 1) the identification of any streams and wetlands under the jurisdiction of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) and 2) the delineation of all water resources subject to land use review and regulation by the ECDC Section 20.15B. Approximately 23,560 square feet (0.54 acres) of wetlands were found on the subject property, generally associated with a depression in the southerly half of the site (See Figure 2). Representative data sheets from that evaluation are provided in Appendix B. Under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, the Corps has jurisdiction over the waters of the United States, including streams, lakes, ponds and wetlands. Although development actions are unspecified at this time, coordination with the Corps and the City of Edmonds regarding any unavoidable fill of wetlands will be required. However, the City of Edmonds County will be the lead regulatory agency. ' 273 ± 25' Buffer 17 Y— Data Points < `" Category 3 .,_,-._ CD Wetland (A 13* i ,tik 3 CN 2 - 01 8 r' AWox Scale PINE ST. Figure 2 Water Resources Map Critical Area Study 2 8`h Avenue S. and Pine Property May 14, 1999 Water Resources 2.2 Methodology Prior to conducting field evaluation, a number of sources were consulted. The Snohomish County Stream and Wetland Survey and Map Atlas (1989) does not identify a wetland on this site. The National Wetland Inventory (NWI) has evaluated wetlands throughout the Edmonds East USGS quadrangle, using the system described in Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States (Cowardin et al. 1979). The NWI map indicates no occurrence of wetlands on the site. Similarly, no wetlands appear on the City of Edmonds Critical Areas or Wetland Inventory Maps. Soils on the site have been mapped as Everett gravelly sandy loam series by the USDA Soil Conservation Service and appear in the 1983 Soil Survey of Snohomish County (Figure 3). To perform the wetland delineation for the site, the 1997 Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual (Ecology 1997) was used. The methodology in this manual recognizes that the three parameters of hydrology and wetland plants are generally found in wetlands and that these parameters are important in the establishment and maintenance of wetland communities. Within the methodology, indicators are evaluated in the field to determine satisfaction of each of the three parameters for establishment of wetland boundaries: 1. Hydrophytic Plants - The US Fish and Wildlife Service (Reed, 1988 and 1993) has established a rating system which has been applied to commonly occurring plant species on the basis of their frequency of occurrence in wetlands. Species indicator status expresses the range in which plants may occur in wetlands and non -wetlands (uplands). Within the State and federal methodology, satisfaction of the hydrophytic plant community criterion is satisfied when the plant community is comprised of 50 percent or more of the dominant species which are adapted to or tolerant of saturated soil conditions: an indicator status of facultative (FAC), facultative wetland (FACW) or obligate (OBL) wetland (Table 1). Critical Area Study g 81h Avenue S. and Pine Property May 14, 1999 LAUREL STREET EX. CASED CONCRETE MONUMENT WITH 2" DOME BRASS CAP WITH "X" 30' ""oil 30' EX. CASED CONCRETE MONUMENT WITH 2" DOME BRASS CAP WITH "X" I I I E I ,f I li _____I _ _ _ _ 1 _EAST-269.39'_ 30.00' �— EXISTING EASEMENT FOR INGRESS, EGRESS AND UTILITIES PER 01 �IACA7� LAJ�I7r�T .� BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT UNDER A.F. NO. 2004 0412534ro N C� NOTE: THE MAINTENANCE OBLIGATIONS ARE THE COLLECTIVE �l RESPONSIBILITY OF THOSE PARTIES TAKING ACCESS FROM SAID EASEMENT I f� I � N I o Qom°, O ��" p I Op EAST o �— —EAST-109.50' � z cq O N .� I LlI y 17.56' EAST-160.50' z V) o = - 0 3,000 SF of to ^ C TRACT A EAST LINE OF LOT 9, r EAST-137.73' O M N La, z N z VACATED BLOCK 10 94.00' 43.73' EAST N 89'57'45" W-101.03' ---------------p0,1 16.00NORM, —1 10' UTILITY `Lp p6 '`ti I 8.40, o EASEMENT q4�6_� — J w TYPICAL o / o r-.----------- — co 3rz� — ao op pp 1p 6,005 SF o i VACA-r U' Ali EY �r - 1 o� O--------------J---- 7,987 SF cP o o CONC. WALL, z 2 rn. - z BROKEN UP L7 6,023 SF � �7 AR,S1 0 90.00' CORNER, EX. 4' 0 r` N 89'57'45" W 1 CHICKEN WIRE FENCE, 1 N N 7g 39.14„ N 89'57'45" W CORNER EX 6' 56.1p, W ra`L ,A' rn Q' WETLAND c N BOUNDARY o SOUTHWEST CORNER w OF VACATED BLOCK 10 : N of 30' 80.00, 179.26' 0 r) 0 M 85.29' 4 12,552 SF 61886 SF NET 99.26' 299.24' m co I w WOOD FENCE, 2.7 E & 0.1 SAST LINE OF LOT 30, w E 0.9' E & 0.2 S w VACATED BLOCK 10 o 00lz `t oolo CORNER, EX. 6' o 00 WOOD FENCE, 0.8' E z 90.00, 1— 299.31' _ I of of of r) I N 89'57'45" W-628.40' PINE STREET LEGAL DESCRIPTION THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 25, TOWNSHIP 27 I10RTH, RANGE 3 EAST, W.M., IN SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF VACATED BLOCK 10 OF THE VACATED PLAT OF KELLOGG PLAT OF EDMONDS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IU VOLUME 2 OF PLATS, PAGE 42, RECORDS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON; THENCE NORTH ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID BLOCK 10 A DISTANCE OF 171.97 FEET; THENCE EAST 1EO.50 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 23.60 FEET, THENCE S 77'12'34" E 8.00 FEET; THENCE EAST 101.03 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF LOT 9, BLOCK 10 OF SAID KELLOGG PLAT; THENCE S 0'01'49" W, ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF LOT 9 AND ITS SOUTHERLY PRODUCTION, AND ALONG THE EAST LINE OF LOT 30, BLOCK 10 OF SAID KELLOGG PLAT, A DISTANCE OF 57.71 FEET; THENCE N 89'57'45" W, PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID BLOCK 10, A DISTANCE OF 90.00 FEET; THENCE S 0'01'49" W, 89.00 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID BLOCK 10; THENCE EAST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF BLOCK 10 A DISTANCE OF 179.26 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. (ALSO KNOWN AS PARCEL B OF CITY OF EDMONDS BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT FILE NO. LL-03-129, AS RECORDED UNDER SNOHOMISH COUNTY AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 2004 o4m5340 , RECORDS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON. 1 � 30' BASIS OF BEARINGS ASSUMED NORTH ON MONUMENTED CENTERLINE OF 8TH AVENUE SOUTH REFERENCE M UJ REFER TO BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT FOR ADDITIONAL N D BOUNDARY INFORMATION (A.F. NO. 2004 041253+G ) rn w I W> STATISTICS 0 Q 'n EQUIPMENT- LIETZ SET 4 ELECTRONIC TOTAL STATION METHOD: FIELD TRAVERSE o ACCURACY: CONFORMS TO WAC 332-130-090 O 0) MONUMENTS VISITED: JANUARY 17, 2003 z NOTE INTERIOR PROPERTY CORNERS WILL BE STAKED ON THE GROUND WITH 1/2" IRON PIN WITH CAP NO'D 22969 AS CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED. LEGEND 0 = SET 1/2" IRON PIN WITH PLASTIC CAP NO'D 22969 A---90'01'35" STATISTICS EQUIPMENT- UETZ SET 4 ELECTRONIC TOTAL STATION METHOD: FIELD TRAVERSE 329.16' 15.49' ACCURACY: CONFORMS TO WAC 332-130-090 MONUMENTS VISITED: JANUARY 17, 2003 EX. CASED CONCRETE ,ro MONUMENT WITH 2" DOME BRASS CAP WITH "X" SHORT SUBDIVISION FOR BETTY L. SHA W IN NE1 /4, NW1 /4, SECTION 25, T.27N., R.3E., W.M. CITY OF EDMONDS SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON CITY OF EDMONDS FILE NO. S-03-154 SHEET 2 OF 2 ��A CD a Figure 2 PINE ST. Water Resources Map 2-0 1 11111, loll !II, i Data Paints .25 T.27N.. R.3 E.W. p m H N 1010 llOr NM � v, M M ,ws � 1010 rocs � M a F0, 7 r1 r--\ SOS X � v „v v 519 521 "' S 77 612 s3 NMMOL111 r tool — 622 Lis �- t 700 Ff�7' 7 702 7Z3 t �E2, • 710 7�t7 779k M �7N •o J v �� 71i Y 903 E0� f10 B31 � gyp 9or yb 2 � 909 906 914 917 .s v PIN[ SMf[T N Vi PARK 1033 1030 #034 Ifs? 1040 le = 4i Q 1041 M ^ 7 ' low v Q rre . I-- I � ! a� I in . I I I Q pm$ w occoo �3o4a1N ALDER ALDER F � n • 0 n1- �1 t J r,�',r to a� 1' t s ` c 3moa"ro �F ►) C u o r M o 415 w WA L N uT WALNUT §� Q d N r V h I` N n ^ I n r n 'o W W f0 P oaa q o bI 1 fl6 11104 CEDAR w ST. CEDAR Ldr 1051 1e61 1109 1127 O SOS 0