1774_001CITY OF EDMONDS
121 - sTH AVENUE NORTH, EDMONDS, WA 98020
ADMINISTRATIVE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND DECISION
To: Bill and J Munson (for Dale Lane)
From:
Brad ley
Associate Planner
Date: April L4,2OI7
File: PLN201-70008
INTRODUCTION
The Applicant is proposing to remove one cedar tree on the Property Owners' site to
improve the view from the applicants' property (Attachment 6). The tree in question is
located within a critical area.
A. Application
L. Propertv Owners/Applicant: Dale Lane/B¡ll and Jan Munson
2. Site Location: 9110 O lympic View Dr. (Lane), Edmonds
3. Request: A conditional use permit to allow the removal of a tree in a geologically
hazardous critical area (Attachment 1)
4. Review Process: An administrative conditional use permit is a Type ll permit.
Following a public comment period, the Director (or designee) makes an
administrative decision.
5. Maior lssues:
a. Compliance with Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) Chapter
18.45 - Land Clearing and Tree Cutting
b. Compliance with ECDC Chapter 20.0L - Types of Development Project Permit
Applications
c. Compliance with ECDC Chapters 23.40 and 23.80 - Environmentally Critical
Areas - General Provisions, and Geologically Hazardous Areas
Munson/Lane Tree Removal Permit
File No. P1N20170008
Page 3 of 7
4) According to ECDC 23.80.070.4.5, vegetation ¡n erosion hazard areas must
be retained unless a building, engineering or land use permit is obtained;
however, select vegetat¡on may be removed without permit pursuant to
ECDC 23.40.220.C.7.
5) According to ECDC 23.40.320, for the purposes of the critical areas code:
"Alteration" meons ony human-induced oction which changes the
existing condition of a critical oreo or its buffer. Alterotions include, but
ore not limited to: grading; filling; dredging; draining; chonnelizing;
cutting, pruning, limbing or topping, clearing, relocoting or removing
vegetation; applying herbicides or pesticides or ony hazardous or toxic
substance; dischorging pollutants; poving, construction, application of
gravel; modifying for surface woter mdnagement purposes; or ony other
humon activity that changes the existing landforms, vegetation,
hydrology, wildlife or wildlife habitot value of criticol oreas.
b. Conclusions:
1) Removal of trees within a critical area is an alteration which requires a
permit.
2l The review criteria of ECDC 23.40.160 are satisfied by the subject permit
and conditions as follows:
o) The proposal minimizes the impact on critical areas in occordonce with
ECDC 23.40.L20, Mitigotion sequencing;
James P. Georgis, Licensed Engineering Geologist from Zipper Geo
Associates, has indicated that the proposed tree removal will not
increase the potential for soil movement or damage to nearby
structures, the site, or adjacent properties (Attachment 3). Replanting
is required since the subject tree is being removed.
b) The proposol does not pose on unreasonoble threat to the public health,
safety, or welfare on or off the development proposal site;
Removal of the cedar tree does not pose an unreasonable threat to the
public health, safety, or welfare on or off the development proposal
sites. A condition will be added that all downed wood must be
removed from the critical area.
c) The proposol is consistent with the generol purposes of this title and the
public interest;
The removal of the subject trees is consistent with the purposes
identified in ECDC 23.40.000 where the goal is to balance preservation
and protection of critical areas while allowing for reasonable use of
private property.
Munson/Lane Tree Removal Permit
File No. P1N20170008
PaBe 4 of 7
d) Any olterations perm¡tted to the critical oreo ore mitigated in
accordance with ECDC 23.40.770, Mitigotion requirements;
Because the cedar is being removed, replacement mitigation is
required. The tree must be replaced at a ratio of 2:! with native and
indigenous species.
e) The proposøl protects the criticsl orea functions and volues consistent
with the best ovailøble science and results in no net loss of criticol orea
functions ond vqlues; and
As indicated in the geotech report, the tree removal will not result in a
net loss of critical area functions and values.
f) The proposol is consistent with other applicoble regulotions and
standards.
The proposal is consistent with both the tree code of ECDC 18.45 and
the critical areas code of ECDC 23.40 and 23.80.
C. Edmonds Comprehens¡ve Plan Compliance
L. Facts:
a. The City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan designates the subject properties
and those in the immediate vicinity as "single Family * Resource".
b. The Comprehensive Plan has the following stated goals and policies for
development within areas of sensitive soils and topography which apply to this
project:
Soils ond Topogrøphy
Gool B. Development on steep slopes or hozordous soil conditions should
preserve the naturol feotures of the site, in occordonce with the
following policies:
8.1 Grading ond Filling.
8.1-.a. Groding, filling, ond tree cutting sholl be restricted to
building pods, drivewoys, access ways ond other impervious
surfaces.
8.L.b. Groding shall not ieopardize the stability of any slope, or of
on odiøcent Proqerty.
8.3 Erosion Control.
8.3.a. Temporory meosures shall be taken to reduce erosion during
construction.
8.3.b. Naturol vegetation should be preserved wherever possible to
reduce erosion ond stobilize slopes, porticulorly on the
d ownh i I I prope rty li ne.
Munson/Lane Tree Removal Perm¡t
F¡le No. P1N20170008
Page 5 of 7
8.3.c. Slopes should be stobilized with deep rooted vegetotion ond
mulch, or other moteriols to prevent erosion ønd siltation of
droinoge woys.
Ve getotio n o nd Wi I d I ife
Gool A.The city should ensure thot its woodlands, morshes and other oreos
contoining notursl vegetotion are preserved, in occordance with the
following policies:
A.2 The removal of trees should be minimized, porticulorly when
they are locoted on steep slopes or hazardous soils.
Subdivision loyouts, buildings ond roods should be designed
so that existing trees ore preserved.
A.3 Trees that ore diseased, damoged, or unstable should be
removed.
A.4 Groding should be restricted to bu¡lding pods and roads only.
Vegetation outside these oreos should be preserved.
2. Conclusion:
a. The proposed conditions ensure the permit is consistent with the policies of
the Comprehensive Plan.
D. Technical Committee
The proposal has been evaluated by the Building and Engineering Divisions as well as
Snohomish County Fire District L (Attachment 5). The Engineering Division suggested
several conditions which have been added to this decision.
E. Public Comment
The City received no comments regarding the application
ilr. DECtStON
Based on Findings of Fact, Conclusions, and Attachments in this report, a Conditional Use
Permit for tree removal at 9110 Olympic View Dr. is GRANTED, subject to the following
conditions:
t. Tree material shall be felled onto private property. All downed wood must be
removed from the critical area. Tree stump to be left in place.
2. Vehicles and equipment shall be located on private property. Should it be necessary
to utilize any portion of the City right-of-way, including the street or sidewalk, to
perform any of this work then the contractor shall apply for and obtain a right-of-way
construction permit in advance of starting work. A traffic control plan will be required
as part of the right-of-way permit application.
Munson/Lane Tree Removal Permit
File No. P1N20170008
Page 6 of 7
3. Contractor/owner/applicant is responsible for keeping all debris on site and
prevent¡ng any silt laden runoff from leaving the site and/or enter¡ng the city storm
system.
4. Contractor/owner/applicant shall repair/replace any damaged sections of
curb/gutter, sidewalk or other public improvements in City right-of-way per City
standards that is caused by or occurs during the permitted project.
5. Contractor/owner/applicant is responsible for locating all on-site util¡t¡es
Relocation/revision/repair to any utilities may require separate permit.
6. The tree must be replaced at a ratio of 2:L with native and indigenous tree species.
The land owner shall replace any trees that are removed with new trees at a ratio of
two replacement trees for each tree removed (2:1) within one year in accordance
with an approved restoration plan. Replacement trees shall be planted at a nearby
location to the removed tree. Replacement trees shall be species that are native and
indigenous to the site and a minimum of one to two inches in diameter at breast
height (dbh) for deciduous trees and a minimum of six feet in height for evergreen
trees as measured from the top of the root ball.
IV. APPEAL
A party of record may submit a written appeal of a Type ll decision within 14 days of the
dateof issuanceofthedecision. Theappealwill beheardatanopenrecordpublic
hearing before the Hearing Examiner according to the requirements of ECDC Chapter
20.06 and Section 20.07.0O4.
V. LAPSE OF APPROVAL
Section 18.45.045.C. states "Any permit granted under the provisions of this section shall
expire one year from the date of issuance. No work may commence on the permit until
the appeal time limit has expired. Upon receipt of a written request, a permit may be
extended for six months."
VI. ATTACHMENTS
1. Land use applications and cover letter
2. Photo of subject trees
3. Geotech report
4. Letter of complete application and public notice materials
5. Departmentalcomments
Munson/Lane Tree Removal Perm¡t
File No. P1N20170008
PageT o17
VII. PARTIES OF RECORD
Bill and Jan Munson
18130 Sunset Way
Edmonds, WA 98026
Dale Lane
9LL0 Olyympic View Dr
Edmonds, WA 98026
Planning Division
Engineering Division
City of Edmonds
Land Use Application
FrLE#?LÀ/2Ctt"¿ôcÍgNE RSI- lâ-
øl.nu
-2/q/ n fuc'osv f¿^ M.
rne $Ît5í- RFcËrPr#-
}ITATTNGDATE
t-trlE )rSrarr rPB rADB -lCC
II ARCHITECTTJRALDESIGNT(EVIEW
N COMFREHSNSTVEPLANAMEI'TDMEI{IT
U CONDInONALUSEPERMIT
B HoMEOccUPAIroN
N FoRMALSUBDIVISION
'J SHORTSUÞDÍVISIoN
U LoTLINEAD'USTMENT
U PLA}.INEDRESIDENTALDEVELOPMENT
U OFFïCIAL STREETÙIÁPAMSNDTVGNT
f] S-IREET VACATTON
tr REZONE
U SHoRËLINEPERMIT
N VARIANCE
iy'onmn:
o PI.EASßNûETflATAIT VITEIN TEEAPPLICATTON APAEI.IC BECON).
PROPERTY ÄDDRES$ OR LOCA'NON
PROJECT NAME (IF APPLICABLE)
P¡iût'lt¡{rt
ADDRË,SS
FAx#
TAxAccouNT#D o 00 sr". /8 r*. å* *o 4
OF {ACH I-FJTTER AS
DESCRTtsE HOIV THE PROJECT MEETS APPLICABLIi CÕDES (ATIACH COVËR LETTER AS NECESSARY)-
APPLICANT #
ADDRESS
E.MAIL FAX#"7
#tCOilTACTPER$ON/AGENT
ADÐR]ìSS
xE-IvfAIL FAX#
Tlre undersþetl applicant, and his&srlits hefus, and as.signs, in co¡sider¿tioo on the prucessing of tlæ application agttes to
releås€, indeü$iry, defe,nd and bold the City of Edmonds ha¡mless from any and all dÂmâges, inchrding reasooable atùorney's
fecs, srising fmm any açtion or inûactio¿ based i¡ uùoþ or part r4on false, misleading, inaccuøte or incomplcte informatim
ñ¡mistcd by thc applícøt hidhcrrlts agcnts or cmployccs.
By my sigaatue, I c€rtiô'tb¡t
a¡d thatl am aulhtrizÊdto flc
tbe information o<hibits herewith submitbd arÊ tt¡Ê and conect b the best of my knowledge
this behalf of the oumer as listsd
SIGNA'ITRE OË APPLICANT/ACENT J t0
Pruperfy Authorfz,atlon
L A
a tn¡e and correct
subjeot land use application, and
subject property for the prrposes to thís application.
SIGNATIjREoF OvfNER
Qrcstions? Call ( 425) 77 1 -0220.
z-
Revlæd on E/22/12 B -IøtdU*Applrcatian PaCe 161
ATTACHMENT 1
qS,ÉGffi'EVÉÐ '
ç[3 0 'r
lii]
February Lo,zoL7 n**,r'u','q*"iilåånvrtt6
To: City of Edmonds Planning Department
From: Bill and Jan Munson 18L30 Sunset Way Edmonds, WA.98026
Regarding: Removal of cedar tree on Dale Lane's property at 9LL0
Olympic View Dr. Edmonds, WA. 98026
To Whom lt May Concern;
Bill and Jan Munson would like to remove the cedar tree on Dale Lane's
property to improve the view from our property as well as our
neighbor's properties. Ami Samuels, Mark Zachariah, Elizabeth Smith
and Date Lane have all agree to share in the cost of the removal as their
view(s) would be improved as well.
Attached you will find a geotechnical report prepared by Zipper Geo
Associates, LLC., a report for tree removal prepared by Eco Tree NW by
an ISA certified arborist, a photo of the tree, mailing labels for the
homes within 300 feet, the City of Edmonds Land Use Application and a
check for the tree cutting permit fee.
The geo tech report provides information on native replacement plants.
Please contact Jan Munson at 206-947-7368 to discuss any questions.
Sincerely,
èÐ
?l
J
çI
ATTACHMENT 2
GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION OF
PROPOSED TREE REMOVAL
ái-'ì.
-,.oí::r:'l-.f
';-.l;i'
ËBFl"'i'tn* , . j
-r-çr ùl '"'-
\ ''-'J - -. ,,lltitJi#
ÐÉ{s\-$råffd\ç{ü1{
9110 Olympic View Drive
Edmonds, Washington
Project No. 1751.00
January 25,2017
Prepared for:
Jan and Bill Munson
Prepared by:
ZGA
Zipper Geo Associates, LLC
Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants
19023 36th Avenue West, Suite D
Lynnwood, WA 98036
ATTACHMENT 3
Zlpper Geo Associates, LLC
Geotechnical and Environmental Consulting
Project Number 1751.00
January 25,2017
Jan and Bill Munson
18130 SunsetWay
Edmonds, Washington 98026
Subject:Geotechnical Evaluation of Proposed Tree Removal
Lane Residence Site
9110 Olympic View Drive
Edmonds, Washington 98026
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Munson,
ln accordance with your request and written authorization, Zipper Geo Associates, LLC (ZGA)
has completed the subsurface exploration and geotechnical evaluation of the Proposed Tree
Removal at 9110 Olympic View Drive in Edmonds, Washington. This report presents the findings
of our site reconnaissance and subsurface exploration, and our geotechnical recommendations
for the project. Our work was completed in general accordance with our Short Form Se¡vice
Agreement (Proposal No. P16306) dated October 26,2016. We appreciate the opportunity to be
of service to you on this project. lf you have any questions concerning this report, or if we may be of
further service, please contact us.
Sincerely,
Zipper Geo Associates, LLG
James P. Georgis, L.E.G
Principal
Copies: Addressee (1)
Thomas A. Jones, P.E.
Principal
1/25/l
r?88
JÅ,$Ëg P. eEOROllS
19023 36th Avenue West, Suite D Lynnwood, WA 98036 (425) 582-9928
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TNTRODUCTTON ........
S¡TE DESCRIPTION....
PROJECT UNDERSTANDING
stTE RECONNA|SSANCE.............
SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS ........
Published Geologic Mapping
Soil Gonditions ...........
G roundwater Conditions
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
General
Geologic Hazard ECA Considerations
Slope Stability Considerations...........
Temporary Erosion Control Considerations.
General Steep Slope Considerations...........
CLOSURE
FIGURES PREPARED BY ZGA
Figure 1 - Site and Exploration Plan
APPENDICES
Appendix A - Subsurface Exploration Procedures and Logs
1
1
1
2
2
2
3
4
4
4
4
5
o
6
7
GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION OF PROPOSED TREE REMOVAL
LANE RESIDENCE SITE
91IO OLYMPIC VIEW DRIVE
EDMONDS, WASHINGTON
Project No. 1751.00
January 25,2017
INTRODUCTION
This report documents the surface and subsurface conditions encountered at the site and our
geotechnical evaluation of the proposed tree removal at 91 10 Olympic View Drive in Edmonds,
Washington. The project description, site conditions, and our geotechnical conclusions and
recommendations are presented in the text of this report. Supporting data including detailed
exploration logs, field exploration procedures, and other supporting information are presented as
appendices.
Our geotechnical scope of services for the project included a document review, site
reconnaissance, subsurface evaluation, geotechnical analysis, and preparation of this report. The
subsurface evaluation consisted of completing two hand auger explorations (designated HA-1 and
HA-2) located near the tree proposed for removal. The hand auger explorations extended about 3
to 13 feet below the existing ground surface.
SITE DESCRIPTION
The site is located at 9110 Olympic View Drive in Edmonds, Washington. The site is a single-
family residential property supporting a centrally located, one-story, wood-framed residence with
a daylight basement and attached garage. A concrete driveway is located on the east side of the
residence and a concrete basement level patio is located on the west side of the residence. The
site is bounded to the north by a single-family residential development, to the south and east by
Sunset Way, and to the west by Olympic View Drive, The residence is generally surrounded by
trees and shrubs with several large diameter cedar trees located in the northwestern portion of
the site. The approximate layout of the western portion of the site is presented on the enclosed
Site and Exploration PIan, Figure 1.
PROJECT UNDERSTANDING
The site is mapped by the City of Edmonds as being within Erosion and Landslide Geologic
Hazard Areas. Specifically, a majority of the site is mapped as having a Severe Erosion Hazard
with 15 to 40 percent slopes, while a portion of the back yard (between the residence and Olympic
View Drive) is mapped as being in a Landslide Hazard Area due to slopes of 40 percent or more.
We understand that you are proposing the removal of one cedar tree with a trunk diameter on the
order of 2% to 3 feet from the northwestern portion of the site. The approximate location of the
tree proposed for removal is shown on Figure l. This report has been prepared to evaluate
potential risks to Geologic Hazard Areas and the site relative to the removal of the identified cedar
tree.
Zipper Geo Associates, LLC
Proposed Tree Removal, 9110 Olympic View Drive, Edmonds, WA
Project No. 1751.00
January 25,2017
SITE RECONNAISSANCE
We completed a reconnaissance of the property and immediate vicinity during a site visit
completed on December 30, 2016. The purpose of the reconnaissance was to identify surficial
features of site conditions such as the presence or absence of groundwater seepage, the
presence or absence of surface erosion, indications of past slope instability, indications of past
land use, the type, extent, and condition of existing vegetation, and the location of the tree
identified for removal, and other site features that may be affected by the planned tree removal.
The enclosed S/e and Exploration Plan, Figure l, shows the approximate location of some of the
observed site features. A summary of our site observations is presented below,
The site is located on a west-facing slope with an estimated total property relief of about 15 to 20
feet. The backyard includes a relatively level bench which extends north from the backyard
concrete patio and appears to be the result of past grading activities. What appears to be a cut
slope efends down to the east side of the bench with a slope inclination of about 30 degrees (58
percent) and about 4 feet of topographic relief. Near the proposed tree removal area, a slope
extends down from the west side of the bench to Olympic View Drive. This slope has two distinct
slope inclinations. The upper portion of the slope, where the tree proposed for removal is located,
has a slope inclination of about 15 to 20 degrees (27 to 36 percent) and about 5 to 7 feet of relief.
Slightly west of the property line, the slope angle increases to about 40 to 60 degrees (84 to 173
percent) with about 6 to I feet of relief. This steeper portion of the slope is adjacent to Olympic
View Drive and appears to be a cut associated with the road construction.
The tree proposed for removal consists of a 2/z to 3-foot diameter cedar located in the back yard
about midway between the residence and Olympic View Drive. This portion of the back yard
supports several other cedar trees with trunk diameters ranging from about 1 to 3 feet and several
tree stumps ranging from about 1 to 3 feet in diameter. The cedar trees are near verticalwith no
prominent lean or curved trucks (which is often indicative a past slope movement) and appear to
be in reasonably good condition (ZGA staff are not license arborists). ln addition, the orientation
of the tree stumps is not suggestive of past slope movement. The area includes a moderately
well-developed understory of ferns, rhododendron, grasses, and other low-growing ground cover,
along with a surficial mantling of duff. We did not observe any surface water flow or indications
of groundwater seepage at the time of our site visit, or hydrophilic vegetation that would indicate
the presence of springs or seeps. We did not observe any significant indication of surficial
erosion, such as rills or sediment deposits at the toe of the slope (eastern edge of Olympic View
Drive).
SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS
Published Geologic Mapping
We assessed the geologic setting of the site and surrounding vicinity by reviewin g The Geotogic
Map of the Edmonds Easf and Po¡tion of the Edmonds West Quadrangle, Washingfon, U.S.
Page 2
Zipper Geo Associates. LLCæ
Proposed Tree Removal, 9110 Olympic View Drive, Edmonds, WA
Project No. 1751.00
January 25,2017
Geological Survey Map MF-1541, 1983. The site is mapped near the contact between
Quaternary Vashon Till (Qvt) deposits and the underlying Quaternary Advance Outwash (Qva)
deposits. The Vashon Till is described as a compact, poorly sorted mixture of clay, silt, sand,
pebbles, cobbles, and boulders in variable amounts. The Advance Outwash is described as
mostly clean, compact, pebbly sand with increasing amounts of gravel higher in the stratigraphic
section.
We also reviewed the United Stated Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation
Service (NRCS) on-line soils mapping application. The NRCS maps the site as Alderwood
gravelly sandy loam (15 to 30 percent slopes). The Alderwood series is described as being
derived from glacial drift and/or glacial outwash deposits.
Soil Conditions
The subsurface exploration for this project included two hand auger explorations (HA-1 and HA-
2) located near the tree proposed for removal. The hand auger explorations extended approximately
3 to 13 feet below the existing ground surface. The approximate exploration locations are shown
on the enclosed Site and Exploration Plan, Figure 1.
Soils were visually classified in general accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System.
Detailed, descriptive logs of the subsurface explorations and the procedures utilized in the
subsurface exploration program are presented in Appendix A. Generalized descriptions of
subsurface soil conditions observed at the exploration locations are presented below. The
stratification and horizontal extent of the soil types observed in our explorations may vary between
explorations. Stratification boundaries on the exploration logs represent the approximate depth
of changes in soil types, although the transition between materials may have been gradual.
Please refer to the hand auger logs in Appendix Afor a more detailed description of the conditions
encountered at the exploration locations.
Hand auger HA-1 was completed on a relatively level bench extending from the backyard concrete
patio and was about 15 feet southeast of the tree proposed for removal. ln general, the exploration
encountered about 3 inches of topsoil over very loose to loose sand with some silt and trace fine
gravel interpreted as fill. The fill extended to a depth of about 13/tfeet and was underlain by about
3 inches or relic topsoil consisting of very loose sand with silt, fine organics, and fine roots. Soil
interpreted as Advance Outwash deposits were encountered below the relic topsoil (at a depth of
about 2 feeg and extended to the totaldepth explored of 13 feet below existing grade. ln general,
the Advance Outwash deposits consisted of loose grading to dense sand with trace to some silt and
trace fine gravel.
Hand auger HA-2 was completed about 6 feet east of the tree proposed for removal. The exploration
encountered about 7 inches of topsoil underlain by Advance Outwash deposits which extended to
Page 3
Zlpper Geo Associates, LLG
Proposed Tree Removal, 9110 Olympic View Drive, Edmonds, WA
Project No. 1751.00
January 25,2017
the total depth explored of 3 feet below existing grade. ln general, the Advance Outwash deposits
consisted of loose grading to medium dense sand with trace to some silt and trace fine gravel.
Groundwater Conditions
Groundwater seepage was not observed in the hand auger explorations which extended to a
maximum depth of about 13 feet below grade. We did not observe soil mottling that might be
indicative a seasonal perched groundwater conditions within the exploration depth. These
observations represent groundwater conditions at the time of the field exploration. Groundwater
conditions should be expected to fluctuate due to changes in season, precipitation patterns, site
utilization, on-site or off-site irrigation activities, and other on- and off-site factors.
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDAT¡ONS
General
Based on the results of our site reconnaissance, document review, subsurface exploration, and
geotechnical analysis, it is our opinion that removal of the proposed cedar tree is feasible from a
geotechnicalperspective. Provided thatthe conditions and recommendations contained within this
report are satisfied, it is our opinion that the proposed tree removal will not increase the potential
for soil movement and the risk of damage to existing structures, the site, and to adjacent
properties from soil instability will not be increased. The following sections provide a discussion
regarding City of Edmonds regulated ECAs and recommendations to reduce risks associated with
the planned cedar tree removal.
Geologic Hazard ECA Gonsiderations
The site is mapped by the City of Edmonds as containing Erosion Hazard and Landslide Hazard
Environmental CriticalAreas (ECAs). We understand that the City has requested a geotechnical
evaluation of the proposed cedar tree removal to assess the risk to regulated Geologic Hazard
ECAs and their associated buffers, as defined in Chapter 23.80 of the City of Edmonds Municipal
Code (EMC) that may result from the planned tree removal and provide recommendations to
mitigate identified risks.
Erosion Hazard Areas: City of Edmonds maps generally identiff the majority of the site as an
Erosion Hazard Area. Section 23.80.0204 of the EMC identifies erosion hazard areas as those
areas containing soils that may experience severe to very severe erosion hazard. This group of
soils include, but are not limited to, the following when they occur on slopes of 15 percent or greater.
. Alderwood Soils (15 to 25 percent slopes). Alderwood/Everett series (25 to 70 percent slopes). Everett series (15 to 25 percent slopes)
The site is mapped by the NRCS as Alderwood soils (soils derived from glacialtill and/or outwash)
and slope inclinations near the proposed tree removal range from of about 27 to 36 percent. As
Page 4
Zipper Geo Associates. LLC
Proposed Tree Removal, 9110 Olympic View Drive, Edmonds, WA
Project No. 1751.00
January 25,2017
such, it is our opinion that the tree removal area is consistent with the EMC criteria for an Erosion
Hazard Area.
Landslide Hazard Areas: City of Edmonds maps identify a portion of the back yard (between the
residence and Olympic View Drive) as being in a Landslide Hazard Area. Section 23.80.0208 of
the EMC defines landslide hazard areas as areas potentially subject to landslides based on a
combination of geologic, topographic, and hydrologic factors. These factors include any slope of
40 percent or steeper that exceeds a vertical height of 10 feet over a 2S-foot horizontal run. This
includes modified slopes (where there are breaks in slope) that meet overall average steepness
and height criteria. Based on our visual observations and field measurements, it appears that the
modified slope (over-steepened cut associated with Olympic View Drive) that extends up to the
proposed tree removal area with a grade break is consistent with the EMC criteria for a Landslide
Hazard Area.
Risk Evaluation Summarv: Provided that the conditions and recommendations contained within
this report are satisfied, it is our opinion that the removal of the identified cedar tree will not
increase the potential for soil movement and the risk of damage to existing structures, the site,
and to adjacent properties from soil instability will not be increased.
Slope Stability Gonsiderations
Tree root systems provide erosion protection and bio-reinforcement for slope soils, thereby
increasing the strength of the soil mass and reducing the risk of slope instability. However, the
weight of the tree can increase the forces tending to drive slope instability and the rocking action
of the root mass during high winds can result in loosening of the slope soils, resulting in a
reduction in slope stability, particularly for large, heavy trees located on or near the crest of steep
slopes. There is some debate in the scientific community regarding the relative contributions of
these different factors to slope stability, but the general consensus appears to be that under most
conditions the presence of trees (in particular the bio-reinforcement they provide) results in a net
improvement to slope stability.
Some species of trees readily sprout after cutting (often referred to as stump-sprouting) thereby
maintaining the reinforcing properties of the root system and decreasing the weight of the tree on
the slope. Cedar is listed in the 1993 publication Vegetation Management: A guide for Puget
Sound Bluff Properfy Owners, produced by the Washington State Department of Ecology
(Publication 93-31) as being capably of stump-sprouting. However, in our experience, cedar trees
of the size proposed for removal at this site do not always survive the cutting process and may
not stump-sprout. Based on our evaluation of the site conditions, it is our opinion that the decay
of the tree root system if the tree does not stump-sprout could result in a minor reduction in the
stability of the slope near the removed trees relative to shallow surficial sliding. Research
indicates that it typically takes about 3 to 5 years to realize a significant reduction in the bio-
reinforcement provided by a tree that does not survive cutting.
Page 5
Zipper Geo Associates, LLC
Proposed Tree Removal, 9110 Olympic View Drive, Edmonds, WA
Project No. 1751.00
January 25,2017
As a precautionary measure, we recommend that the cedar stump be left in place and that the
tree removal plan include new plantings near the stump. We recommend that native woody
shrubs or small trees be considered to reduce the need for watering and keep the weight and
wind loading characteristics of the new growth to reasonable levels as it matures. The following
table provides some plant species that could be considered to reduce the potential for erosion
and increase resistance to shallow surficial sloughing. The information presented below is a
relatively small sampling of plant species discussed in the 1993 publication S/ope Stabilization
and Erosion Control using Vegetation, produced by the Washington State Department of Ecology
(Publication 93-30). The table below is by no means intended to be comprehensive or restrictive
relative to the selection of appropriate plantings.
Temporary Erosion Control Considerations
We anticipate that the tree removal process will likely result in disturbance of the ground surface
and a temporary increase in the potential for erosion. We therefore recommend that the tree
removalservice utilize means and methods intended to minimize ground disturbance. ln addition,
we recommend that soils exposed within Geologic Hazard Areas and their buffers be covered
with a temporary erosion control material, such as sterile straw or arborist mulch.
General Steep Slope Considerations
Owners of properties containing or adjacent to steep slopes should recognize that soil loss or
downslope displacement from steep slopes is a naturally occurring mass wasting process, and
that some soil loss from steep slopes should be expected over time, particularly in response to
POTENTIAL PLANT SELECTION GUIDE
Plant Name Form & Habit Mature
Size
Rooting
Characteristics
Recommended
Spacinq
Snowberry
(Symphoricarpos Albus)
Evergreen shrub;
spreads by runners to
form thicket
Height:4'
Spread: 3'
Fibrous,
Shallow depth 2'+
Salal
(Gaultheria Shallon)
Evergreen shrub;
spreads by runners to
form thicket
Height: 3'
Spread: 3'
Fibrous,
Shallow depth 2'+
Evergreen Huckleberry
Oemle ria Ce rasiformis)
Evergreen shrub; does
not soread
Height:6'
Spread: 3'
Fibrous,
Shallow depth 3',+
Ocean Spray
(Holodiscus Discolor)
Deciduous shrub; does
not always spread
aooressivelv
Height: 10'+
Spread:6'
Fibrous,
Moderate depth 4'+
Vine Maple
(Acer Circinatum)
Deciduous shrub; does
not always spread
aqqressively
Height: 15'+
Spread:10'
Fibrous,
Moderate depth.8'+
HookerWillow
(Salix Hookeriana)
Deciduous shrub; does
not sÞread
Height:20'+
Spread: 15'
Fibrous,
Moderate deoth.3'+
Reference: Slope Stabilization and Erosion Control using Vegetation, Washington State Department of
Ecoloov Publication 93-30. 1993.
Page 6
Zipper Geo Associates. LLC
Proposed Tree Removal, 9110 Olympic View Drive, Edmonds, WA
Project No. 1751.00
January 25,2017
episodic severe storm events. The conclusions and recommendations presented in this report are
intended to allow for the removal of the identified cedar tree while maintaining the existing stability
of the site slopes. The findings presented in this report should not be interpreted as indicating that
the site steep slopes will be stable under all possible future conditions.
CLOSURE
The analysis and recommendations presented in this report are based, in part, on the explorations
completed for this study. The number, location, and depth of the explorations were completed
within the constraints of budget and site access so as to yield the information to formulate our
recommendations.
This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Jan and Bill Munson, and their agents, for
specific application to this project and has been prepared in accordance with generally accepted
geotechnical engineering practices. No warranties, express or implied, are intended or made.
Site safety is the responsibility of others. ln the event that changes in the nature, design, or
location of the tree removal as outlined in this report are planned, the conclusions and
recommendations contained in this report shall not be considered valid unless Zipper Geo
Associates, LLC reviews the changes and either verifies or modifies the conclusions of this report
in writing.
Page 7
LEGEND
o HA-r
3'STUMP
TO 3'CEDAR PROPOSED
FOR REMOVAL
<_20_40.
OYLMPIC VIEW DRIVE
HAND AUGER NUMBER AND
APPROXIMATE LOCATION
APPROXIMATE LOCATION
OF TREE STUMP
APPROXIMATE LOCATION
OF LIVE TREE
o
o
APPROXIMATE
PROPERTY ----------------
LINE LOCATION
2.5'STUMP
30'SLOPE
4'RISE
15-20'SLOPE
PROP.
CORNER
STAKE
9110 OLYMPIC VIEW DRIVE
2 X 1'STUMPS 2'STUMP
1ST FLOOR DECK
OVERHANG
RELATIVELY
LEVEL BENCH
co
Q Hn-t
3'CEDAR
1.5'CEDAR
HA-2
2'CEDAR
1'CEDAR
40_60. 4
SLOPE CUT 3'CEDAR
o
20
APPROXIMATE
EDGE OF ASPHALT
PAVEMENT
coNc
PATIO
PROPOSED TREE REMOVAL
9110 OLYMPIC VIEW DRIVE
EDMONDS, WASHINGTON
SITE AND EXPLORATION MAP
DATE: JANUARY 2017 Job No. 1751.00
Zipper Geo Associates, LLC
19023 36th Ave. W.,Suite D
Lynnwood, WA
1
FIGURE
SHT. I of 1
SCALE IN FEET
10 20
APPENDIX A
FIELD EXPLORATION PROCEDURES AND LOGS
FIELD EXPLORI\TION PROCEDURES
Field Exploration Description
Our field exploration for this project included two hand auger explorations completed on
December 30, 2016. The approximate exploration locations are presented on the enclosed S,fe
and Exploration Plan, Figure L Exploration locations were determined in the field by measuring
distances from existing site features with a fiberglass tape. As such, the exploration locations
should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the means and methods to establish
them. The following sections describe our procedures associated with the explorations.
Descriptive logs of the explorations are enclosed in this appendix.
Hand Auger Procedures
An engineering geologist from our firm advanced a 3.5-inch diameter auger by hand, continuously
observing the soil cuttings as they were retrieved. Representative portions of the soils retrieved
were placed in moisture tight containers and returned to our laboratory for further visual
classification and testing.
The enclosed hand auger logs indicate the vertical sequence of soils and materials encountered
in each exploration, based primarily on our field classifications and supported by our subsequent
laboratory testing. Where a soil contact was observed to be gradational or undulating, our logs
indicate the average contact depth. Our logs also indicate the approximate depths of any sidewall
caving or groundwater seepage observed in the explorations, as well as all sample numbers and
sampling locations.
zl}..,ER GEO ASSOCIATES, L-C
19023 36ú Avenue Wes! Suite D, Lynnwood, Washington 98036
HANDAUGERHA-l
Location: See Site and Exploration Plan, Figure I
Approximate Ground Elevation: NA
Project: Lane Residence Tree Removal
Project No: 1751.00
Date Excavated: 12-30-20 16
Depth
(f0
Material Description Sample Nc YoM Testing
, Very loose, wet, dark brown SAND, with silt, fine organics,
'.... and_fine-:"_"J: fTgp:gt])_ _ _ _ _ - _ _ - - _
Very loose to loose, moist, light brown SAND, some silt, trace fine
gravel (Fill)
Very loose, moist, dark brown SAND, with silt, fine
.._ qråagiqs, and Ítl"-fo-ojt- (tsgli g
Loose to medium dense, moist, light gray-brown SAND, trace to
some silt, trace fine gravel. (Glacial Advance Outwash)
Grades to medium dense at about 4 feet
Grades to dense at about 8 feet
I
)
s-l @ 1.s'4
J
4
s-2@4',15
5
6
7
I
s-3 @ 8'30
9
10
ll
t2
Note: Nc is the Dynamic Cone Penetrometer blow count per ASTM
Special Publication #399.
ZITPER GEO ASSOCIATES, LuG
19023 36û Avenue West, Suite D, Lynnwood, Washinglon 98036
HANDAUGERHA-2
Location: See Site and Exploration Plan, Figure I
Approximate Ground Elevation: NA
Project: Lane Residence Tree Removal
Project No: 1751.00
Date Excavatedz 12-30-2016
Depth
(fr)
Material Description Sample Nc o/oM Testing
Very loose, wet, dark brown SAND, with silt, fine organics, and
fine roots (Topsoil)
Loose grading to medium denseo moist, light gray-brown SAND,
trace to some silt, trace fine gravel (Glacial Advance Outwash)
I
2
1
s-r @2.5'14
Hand auger completed at 3 feet on12130/2016.
No groundwater observed at time of exploration.
No caving observed.4
5
6
7
I
10
ll
12
Note: Nc is the Dynamic Cone Penetrometer blow count per ASTM
Special Public ation #399.
Zipper Geo Associates, LLG
19023 - 36th Avenue West, Suite D
Lynnwood, WA 98036
425.582.9928
Federal Tax lD # 454956075
INVOICE
Jan and Bill Munson
18130 Sunset Way
Edmonds, WA 98026
January 27,2017
lnvoice 1795
Re: Bill¡ng for Geotechn¡cal Professional Serv¡ces
Proposed Tree Removal at 9110 Olympic View Drive, Edmonds, WA
Zipper Geo Associates Project No. 1751.00
lnvoico PeÌ¡od Decembe¡ 12. 2016 throush January 27, 2017.
Date Professional Hours Sêrv¡ces Providedffiffi*Miäãr
-ı--1211212016 James P. Georgis 1.00 Project startup & One-Call
12128120'16 James P. Georgis 0.50 Review regional geology
1213012016 James P. Georgis 4.00 Site reconnaissance & hand augers
1213012016 James P. Georgis 0.50 Prepare exploration logs
0110312017 Stephen Miller 1.00 Drafting
0110312017 James P. Georgis 1.00 Review DNR data and City code
0112412017 James P. Georgis 5.50 Report Preparation
o1t27t2017 Tom Jones 0.25 Report Review
14.75
Professional Classification Total Hours Rate/Hour Amount B¡llod
Stephen Miller
Tom Jones
James Georgis
James Georgis
M¡leage Date
Field Engineer
Pr¡ncipal
Senior Geologist
Staff Geologist
Description
Mileage
1.50
0.25
8.00
5.00
$85.00
$170.00
$r30.00
$95.00
$127.50
$42.50
$1,040.00
s475.00
14.75 $f ,685.00
$8.03
M¡lês
12.30.2016
Tota¡ Expenses
15 $0.535
$8.03
.03uelnvoice
Author¡zed Budget per Agreement:
lnvoiced Amount:
Budget Remaining:
$1 ,710.00
ú1,
d
D
I
J/P
q \1
û¡tt4å** þa ,{¿r,,i,Ç
Þ.,. v
James Georgis, Zipper Geo Associates, LLC
CITY OF EDMONDS
12L 5th Avenue North, Edmonds WA 98020
Phone: 425.77L.O220. Fax: 425.77I.O221- . Web: www.edmondswa.gov
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT . PLANNING DIVISION
c. l8 9 s
Morch 7,2017
Jon Munson
9l I 0 Olympic View Drive
robmoryc@yohoo.com
SUBJECT NOTICE OF COMPLETENESS FOR TREE REMOVAL APPTICATION
TOCATED AT 9I I O OI.YMPIC VIEW DRIVE.
FrtE NO. PtN20l20008
Deor Jon Munson
Your opplicotion for o tree removol locoted ot 9l l0 Olympic View Drive become procedurolly complete
pursuont to Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) 20.02.002 on Februory 9,2012. Further
clorificotion or documentotion moy be required. I will begin public notice requirements within 14 doys.
I will be the moin stoff contoct for your opplicotion. lf you hove questions ot ony point during the review process,
you moy reoch me ot brod.shipley@edmondswo.gov or 1425lr 771-0220.
Sincerely,
Development Services Deportment - Plonning Division
Brqd Shipley
Associote Plonner
File No. PLN20lZ0008
Dole Lone
Cc
ATTACHMENT 4
Fl[E NO.: P1N20170008
APPtICANT: Munson/Lone
DECLARATION OF POSTING
NOTICE OF APPTICATION
On the lBt' doy of Morch , 2017 the ottoched Notice of Applicotion & Commenl
Period wos posted os prescribed by Ordinonce ond in ony event where
opplicoble on or neor lhe subject property.
l, Brod Shipley, hereby declore under penolty of perjury under the lows of the
Stote of Woshington thot the foregoing is true ond correct this l Stt doy of Morch,
2017, oi Edmonds, Woshington
Signed:
{BFP747892.DOC; 1\00006.900000\ }
FILE NO. PLN2O17OOO8
APPLICANT: Munson/Lane Tree Cutting
DECLARATION OF MAILING
On the 18'h day of March, 201.7 , ttre attached Notice of Application was mailed by the City to
property owners within 300-feet of the property that is subject of the application refetenced above.
The names were provided by the applicant.
I, Denise Nelson, hereby declare under penalty of perjury undet the laws of the State of \Tashington
that the foregoing is true ¿nd conect this 18'h day of Match, 201.7 , at Edmonds, rùØashington.
Sþed:
Everett Daily Herald
AffTdavit of Publication
State of Washington )
County of Snohomish ì ss
Kathleen Landis being first duly swom, upon
oath deposes and says: that he/she is the legal
representative of the Everett Daily Herald a
daily newspaper. The said newspaper is a legal
newspaper by order of the superior court in the
county in which it is published and is now and
has been for more than six months prior to the
date of the frst publication of the Notice
hereinafter referred to, published in the English
language continually as a daily newspaper in
Snohomish County, Washington and is and
always has been printed in whole or part in the
Everett Daily Herald and is of general
circulation in said County, and is a legal
newspaper, in accordance with the Chapter 99
of the Laws of 1921, as amended by Chapter
213, Laws of 1941, and approved as a legal
newspaper by order of the Superior Court of
Snohomish County, State of Washington, by
order dated June 16, 1941, and that the annexed
is a true copy of EDH74881927041800203300
as it was published in the regular and entire
issue of said paper and not as a supplement
form thereof for a period of I issue(s), such
publication commencing on O3l20l20l'7 and
ending on 03120/2017 and that said newspaper
was regularly distributed to its subscribers
during all of said period.
The amount of the fee for such publication is
ss3.32.
Subscribed and sworn before me on this
1n 44þ¿L)day of
Notary Public in and for the State of
Washington.
City ofEdmonds - LEGAL ÀDS I 14101416
BRAD SHIPLEY
DEBRA ANN GRIG
NotorY Publlc
Stote ol Woshlnglon
My Commlsslo
Oclober 3t
G
n Expires
,2017
CITY OF EDMONDS
NOÍICE OF DEV-E-OPMEN-I APPLICATION AND
COMMENT PERIOD
NAME OF APPLICANT: Jan Munson
DATÉ OF APPLICATION: February gth' 2017
DATE OF CoMPLFTËNESS: March 71h,2017
DATE OF NOTICE; Nrarch 20th' 2017
FILE NO.r P1N20170008
PROJECT LOCATIONì 91 10 Olympic V¡ow Dr'
Edmonds, WA
(Pârcel No. 27041 800203300)
PBOJECT DËSCRIPTION: Appl¡cat¡on lo romove ons (1) trêe
wÌlh¡n a cr¡tlcal arsâ'
RÉOUESTED PERMIT: Condllional Usê Pormlt
OTHER REQUIRED PERMITS: NONE.
REQUIRED STUOIES: Geotech RêPorl
EXISTING ËNVIRONMENTALDOCUMENTS: Crltlcâl Arsas Checklist.
ıotr¡tue ur PERIOD: Commants du6 bv Aprll 3rd 2p1¡. Any
oerson hâs the rioht to commont on th¡s âpplical¡on dur¡ng lhe
bubiic comment ı€r¡od. rscoivs nolic€ and part¡cipat€ in any
hesrlnos. and reouest a copv of the decislon oo the applicatlon.
Thã Cäv'mav âccoot oubllb'commenls at any tlma prior to th0
closlno'of thä record ól an oÞen record Þre'dec¡slon heârlng' ll
anv. oí if no open r€cord Dre'decision hear¡ng is provided' priol
to iire ðecision on tho prdisct permit. Oilly part¡es of rscord as
dêl¡nsd in ECÞC 20.07.003 hûve slandÍng to ¡n¡l¡416 an
âdmin¡strâtivê aooeâ1.
CITY cONTAcT: dàd sh¡plev, Assæiate Plânner
(42s) 771 -0220, Br¡ddlhi0loy.@3flma0dswq,g0v
tPubllsñod: March 20;20i7. 80H748819 I-1- Ill
#
ADJACENT PROPE RTY OWNERS LIST
Attach this notarized declaration to the adjacent property owners list.
On my oath, I certify that the names and addresses provided represent all properties
located within 300 feet of the subject property.
Signatu Applicant Applica nt's Representative
Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of
.ff" þ.
¡r.à
9D/,^
fr
T
.t
¡q
r$
ry Public in and for the State of ngton
9î:?ftr,f\\FffËT_#Htrn
h''is r-..1t*"rLì- H Yd'' Ë,[Lji
FIS 03 :I;ì
l.¡hVËLüPívWiüT $ËFfVltËS
OÛU¡\iTËR
t:
Residing at
u',.oF ,
^,;,r.,
Revised on 9/30/1 I P2 - Adjacent Property Owners List Page 2 of2
Easy Peel@ Labels
Use Avery@ Template 5f 60@
I
I
I¡
along line to iPopUpEdgeru )6 I
^
AVERY@ seooru
27031300102000 21112017
TTEES SNEERINGER MARK or RESIDENT
9227 OLYMPIC VIEW DR
EDMONDS, WA 98020
27041800200600 21112017
ARCHER KATHLEEN E OT RESIDENT
9106 OLYMPIC VIEW DR
EDMONDS, WA 98020
27031300101500 2nn017
BOWES LINDA A or RESIDENT
9229 OLYMPIC VIËW DR
EDMONDS, WA 98020-2396
00914200000300 21112017
FU FRANK C & HELENE C OT RESIDENT
17908 VISTA DEL MAR DR
EDMONDS, WA 98026
27041800200400 21112017
EASTLAND BRIAN / KRIST or RESIDENT
9118 OLYMPIC VIEW DR
EDMONDS, WA 98026
27041800201500 21112017
ZACHARIA MARK A & SAMU or RESIDENT
18128 SUNSET WAY
EDMONDS, WA 98026
27041800202200 21112017
ANDREE DAVID J & APRIL or RESIDENT
7931 TALBOÏ RD
EDMONDS, WA 98026
27041800203700 21112017
ENGLISH DAVID A & SHER OT RESIDENT
9104 OLYMPIC VIEW DR
EDMONDS, WA 98026
27041800202800 211120'17
KISSINGER STEPHEN or RESIDENT
9OO7 OLYMPIC VIEW DR
EDMONDS, WA 9802ô-5322
27041800201400 21112017
TASCHE CHRISTIAN or RESIDENT
18214 SUNSET WAY
EDMONDS, WA 98026-5332
www.avery,com
1.800-GO.AVERY
A T
FeedPaper
-
Bend
expose
27031300101000 21112017
NIRSCHL MARK A & SHAUN or RESIDENT
3614 I59TH PL SE
MrLL CREEK, W A 98012-4737
27031300103600 21112017
OLSON CHRISTIAN A & SA or RESIDENT
9221 OLYMPIC VIEW DR
EDMONDS, WA 98020
00565600101502 21112017
WALL BRAD & MANDIE OT RESIDENT
9204 OLYMPIC VIEW DR
EDMONDS, WA 98020-2396
00914200000100 2l'1120'17
MARTURANO ROSS P/GAYLE OT RESÍDENT
18006 VISTA DEL MAR DR
EDMONDS, WA 98026
00914200000500 21112017
CANNING RICHARD & CHAR OT RESIDENT
I7906 VISTA DEL MAR DR
EDMONDS, WA 98026
270418002005A0 21112017
SMITH ELIZABETH C OT RESIDENT
9102 OLYMPIC VIEW DR
EDMONDS, WA 98026
00565600101501 211120't7
RINGSTAD JOAN E/GEORGE or RESIDENT
9202 OLYMPIC VIEW DRIVE
EDMONDS, WA 98020
27031300103700 21112017
ROSEN MTCHAEL J/HOWARD or RESIDENT
9223 OLYMPIC VIEW DR
EDMONDS, WA 98020
27031300101400 2l'112017
GREEN MICHAEL K or RESIDENT
9225 OLYMPIC VIEW DR
EDMONDS, WA 98020-2396
00914200000200 21112017
STONE MARK Ð oT RESIDENT
18004 VISTA DEL MAR DR
EDMONDS, WA 98026
00914200001200 21112017
COBLE JOHN C/LYNDA J T OT RESIDENT
18007 VISTA DEL MAR DR
EDMONDS, WA 98026
27041800200700 21112017
SAGE DOUGLAS W & STARL or RESIDENT
9112 OLYMPIC VIEW DR
EDMONDS, WA 98026
27041800202000 2/',112017
SHIPPEN MATTHEW & ELAN or RESIDENT
1810I SUNSETWAY
EDMONDS, WA 98026
27041800203300
LANE DALE A oT RESIDENT
9110 OLYMPIC VIEW DR
EDMONDS, WA 98026
21112017
27041800202700 21112017
ZANDBERG MARK oT RESIDENT
9OO3 OLYMPIC VIEW DR
EDMONDS, WA 98026-5322
27041800201300 21112017
MUNSON JANET OT RESIDENT
18130 SUNSET WAY
EDMONDS, WA 98026.5331
27041800201900
PECK DAVID F OT RESIDENT
91OB OLYMPIC VIEW DR
EDMONDS, WA 98026
21112017
2?041800202400 21112017
VILES AYAKO NAGASAKA/D OT RESIDENT
18030 TALBOT RD
EDMONDS, WA 98026
27041800203800 21112017
MIZUKOSHI TAKUMI OT RESIDENT
9122 OLYMPIC VIEW DR
EDMONDS, WA 98026
27041800202100 21112017
RAPTIS NIKOLAOS C or RESIDENT
91OO OLYMPIC VIEW DR
EDMONDS, WA 98026-5323
A
Sens de
chargement
I
Repliez à la hachure aftn de !
révéler le rebord Pop-UptM j
I
I
I
I
^
Étiquettes faciles à peler i
Utilisez le gabarit AVERY@ 5160@ j
P roj ect Area I 27 04180 020 330 0
49
37
13
't5 38 47
14
7 5
46
4 3 2 1
I
6 45179TH PL SW
7 I 9 10 1'l 12 M
t0
3 43
4 I
rÉw24\,
3
7 l5
a3 14
16l,3 44
20 12
TR 1
23
30 11
2 15
2 2 3
15 o-3
14 1
'l 4 1113
12
1 14
1 2 11
3 5
4 16
1 1311
3B 17
10 9 5 15
4 12
14
9 6
1 2 9 1023
7 I 't1
7 6
6 ST SW
6 5
'18 ,|
104
3A 40
2 3 9
1
2
D 1
1
3
Township:27 Range:4 Section: 18
Parcels
Selected Parcels
Parcel(s) of lnterest Snohomish County
N 4{l+
O Mailing Radius (3oo feet)
PLSS Grid
Snohom¡sh County disclâims any waranty of merchantability or
warranty of fitness of this data (or map) for any particular purpose,
either express or impl¡ed. No representation or warranty is made
ænceming the accuracy, currency, completeness or quality of data
dep¡cted. Any user of lhis data (or map) assumes all respons¡bility
for use thereof, and further agrees to hold Snohomish County
hârmless from and against any damage, loss, or liability ârising
from any use of this data (or map).s
Application Provided by:
lnformation Services/GlS
Produced 21112017
I
W
{
33
?
52
Y
179TH PL SW
ST SW
2
oz
Jro
I
14
2
9$l
A\
I
6
7
l0
1
I
7
=
uJ
EFO
O)4
I
:¿¿lq
A¡ð
51
I
t5 38
46
4 3 2
45
I 10 11 12I 44
43
6
2 54
16
11
t5
12
18
30
2
2
2 J 4
1
1 14123
1
13
54
6
'l 32 1032 1176
1
40
2
A 3
7I 6
4
17
4
3A
I
1
1857
o)
c
o*
MEMORANDUM
Date:
To:
From:
March 24,2017
Brad Shipley, Associate Planner
Chris Rivera, Engineering Technician
Tod Moles, Street/Storm Manager
Subject:PLN201700083 - Tree Cutting Permit
Bill & Jan Munson of 18130 Sunset Way
for Dale Lane - 9110 Olympic View Dr.
Engineering has reviewed the application for the proposed tree removal at 9110 Olympic
View Drive (within the Critical Areas). The information provided is consistent with Title 18
Edmonds Community Development Code & Engineering standards. It is requested that the
following be included as a condition of project approval.
1) Trees shall be fell onto private property.
2) Vehicles and equipment shall be located on private property. Should it be necessary to
utllize any portion of the City right-oÊway, including the street or sidewalk, to
perform any of this work then the contractor shall apply for and obtain a right-of-way
construction permit in advance of starting work. A traffic control plan will be required
as part of the right-of-way permit application.
3) Contractor/owner is responsible for keeping all debris on site and preventing any silt
laden runoff from leaving the site and/or entering the city storm system.
4) Contractor/owner shall repair/replace any damaged sections of curb/gutter, sidewalk
or other public improvements in City right-of-way per City standards that is caused by
or occurs during the permitted project.
5) Contractor/owner is responsible for locating all on-site utilities. The water, sewer and
storm utility purveyor for this site is the City of Edmonds. Relocation/revision/repair
to any utilities may require a separate permit.
Thank you
City of Edmonds
ATTACHMENT 5