Ordinance 36420006.900000
WSS /gjz
4/20/07
ORDINANCE NO. 3642
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON, APPROVING THE REZONE OF CERTAIN
REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 24310 76TH AVENUE
WEST FROM NEIGHBORHOOD BUSINESS (BN) TO
COMMUNITY BUSINESS (BC), ADOPTING FINDINGS OF
FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, AND FIXING A TIME
WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE.
WHEREAS, the City Council received the recommendation of its Planning Board
regarding File No. R -05 -97 recommending approval of rezone of certain real property located
24310 76th Avenue West, Edmonds, Washington, from Neighborhood Business (BN) to
Community Business (BC); and
2007; and
WHEREAS, the City Council held a closed record public hearing on April 17,
WHEREAS, having considered the record before it and the recommendation of
the Planning Board, and the arguments presented to it at the closed record public hearing, the
City Council hereby deems it to be in the public interest to approve the rezone, based upon the
Findings of Fact and Conclusions referenced herein; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. For its Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, the Edmonds
City Council hereby adopts the Planning Division Advisory Report Findings, Conclusions and
{ WSS659075.DOC;1 /00006.900000/}
-1-
Recommendations, contained as Exhibit 2 in the closed record review and dated February 9,
2007, incorporating these Findings and Conclusions as fully as if herein set forth.
Section 2. Certain real property referenced in File No. R- 2005 -97 with the street
address of 24310 - 76th Avenue West, Edmonds, Washington, is hereby rezoned from
Neighborhood Business (BN) to Community Business (BC). The Community Services Director
or his designee is hereby authorized to amend the official zoning map of the City to reflect such
action.
Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifi-
cally delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum, and shall take effect
five (5) days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the
title.
ATTEST /AUTHENTICATED:
CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY:
BY ( 5� &
W. SCOTT SNYDER
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: 04/27/2007
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: 05/08/2007
PUBLISHED: 05/13/2007
EFFECTIVE DATE: 05/18/2007
ORDINANCE NO. 3642
{ WSS659075.DOC;1 /00006.900000/}
-2-
SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. 3642
of the City of Edmonds, Washington
On the 8th day of May, 2007, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed
Ordinance No. 3642. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting of the title,
provides as follows:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, APPROVING THE
REZONE OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 24310 76TH AVENUE WEST
FROM NEIGHBORHOOD BUSINESS (BN) TO COMMUNITY BUSINESS (BC),
ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, AND FIXING A TIME
WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE.
The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request.
DATED this 9th day of May, 2007.
CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE
{ WSS659075.DOC;1 /00006.900000/}
-3-
To:
From:
CITY OF EDMONDS
121 5TH AVENUE NORTH, EDMONDS, WA 98020
Planner
PLANNING DIVISION
ADVISORY REPORT
,kUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Date: FEBRUARY 9, 2007
File: R- 2005 -97 A request by Tony Shapiro for Ron Knowles to rezone the lot addressed 24310
76'h Ave. W. from Neighborhood Business (BN) to Community Business (BC).
Hearing Date, Time, and Place: February 14, 2007, At 7:00 PM,
Edmonds City Council Chambers
Public Safety Complex
250 5'h Avenue North
TABLE OF CONTENTS
05097rezone_sr.doe / February 9, 2007 / Staff Report
Section Page
I.
INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... ............................... 2
A. APPLICATION INFORMATION ..................................................................................... ..............................2
B. RECOMMENDATION ON THE PROPOSED REZONE ..................................................... ............................... 2
II.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS ............................................................. ..............................2
A. SITE DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................... ............................... 2
B. SEPA DETERMINATION ........................................................................................... ............................... 2
C. EDMONDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE (ECDC) COMPLIANCE .................... ............................... 3
D. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ........................................................................................... ............................... 3
E. TECHNICAL COMMITTEE .......................................................................................... ..............................4
F. PUBLIC COMMENTS .................................................................................................. ..............................4
III.
ATTACHMENTS .......................................................................................................... ............................... 4
IV.
PARTIES OF RECORD ................................................................................................. ..............................4
05097rezone_sr.doe / February 9, 2007 / Staff Report
Knowles Rezone
File No. R- 2005 -97
Page 2 of 4
I. INTRODUCTION
The applicant owns a parcel that is roughly 12,000 sq. ft. and is split zoned, Neighborhood Business on the
north portion and Community Business on the southern portion. They have already gone through a
Comprehensive Plan Amendment to resolve this issue on the Comprehensive Plan. For that request, the
Planning Board and the City Council approved a change that made the Comprehensive Plan Designation of
the entire property Highway 99 Corridor. The current rezone request is the applicant's proposal for bringing
the zoning of the entire property into compliance with the newly adopted Comprehensive Plan. It is that the
entire property would be zoned Community Business (BC).
A. Application Information
1. Applicant: Tony Shapiro for Ron Knowles
2. Site Location: The property addressed 24310 76h Ave. W. (see Attachment 1).
3. Request: A Rezone from Neighborhood Business (BN) to Community Business (BC)(see
Attachments 1 -3).
4. Review Process: Rezone - Planning Board conducts a public hearing and issues a
recommendation to the City Council for a final decision.
5. Mai or Issues:
a. Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) Chapter 20.40 (Rezones).
b. Compliance with Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) Section 20.100.010
(Hearing Examiner, Planning Advisory Board and City Council Review).
B. Recommendation on the Proposed Rezone
Based on Findings of Fact, Conclusions and Attachments to this report Planning Staff recommends
approval of the proposed rezone.
II. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS
A. Site Description
1. Site Development And Zoning:
a) . Facts:
(1) Size and Shape: The property is basically square with about 12,000 sq. ft.
(2) Existing Zoning: Split zoned, Community Business on the south portion and
Neighborhood Business on the north portion.
(3) Existing Land Use: There is currently the shell of an old convenience store that is
vacant at the current time.
2. Neighboring Development And Zoning:
a) Facts:
(1) North: The property is owned by a landscape company and was previously a gas
station. The property is zoned Neighborhood Business.
(2) South: Zoned and developed under the Community Business regulations.
(3) East: Zoned Neighborhood Business and developed as a church and school.
(4) West: Zoned and developed under both the RS -8 regulations (see Attachment 1).
05097rezone_sr.doc / 02/09/2007/ Staff Report
Knowles Rezone
File No. R- 2005 -97
Page 3 of 4
B. Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) Compliance
1. ECDC Section 20.40 (Rezones)
a) Fact:
(1) ECDC 20.40.0 10 states that at a minimum the following factors shall be considered in
reviewing a proposed rezone:
(a) Is the proposal consistent with the Comprehensive Plan; and,
(b) Is the proposal consistent with the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance, and the
proposed zone district; and,
(c) The relationship of the proposed rezone to the existing land uses and zoning of
surrounding or nearby properties; and,
(d) Has there been sufficient change in the character of the immediate area or in
city policy to justify the rezone; and,
(e) Whether the property is economically and physically suitable for the uses
allowed under the existing zoning, and under the proposed zoning; and,
(f) The relative gain to the public health, safety and welfare compared to the
potential increase or decrease in value to the property.
(2) The applicant has submitted their declarations, included as Attachment 2, which address
the above described criteria. Staff agrees with the applicant's declarations.
(3) See section C below for a discussion regarding the compliance of the proposed rezone
with the Comprehensive Plan.
(4) The proposal is generally consistent with the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance and the
proposed zone district. Further review and compliance will be determined on a case by
case review of all development proposals and license requests.
(5) As demonstrated in attachments 1 - 3, the surrounding zoning pattern is maintained with
the proposed rezone request. The request is also supported by the development pattern
in the area.
(6) Currently the subject property and one of its neighbors are vacant which raises the
question about whether or not the properties are economically suitable for uses currently
allowed under the current Comp Plan and zoning.
(7) The property is identified on the City's Comprehensive Plan as Highway 99 Corridor.
This designation is appropriate for the requested BC zoning classification and is further
justified by the fact that the other properties in the same Comp Plan designation in that
immediate area are also zoned BC.
b) Conclusions:
(1) Rezoning the entire property to BC would be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan
and the other rezone criteria.
C. Comprehensive Plan
a) Facts:
(1) The Comprehensive Plan map identifies the subject property as part of the Highway 99
Corridor. The proposed rezone request to BC is consistent with this Comprehensive
Plan designation as described on page 16 of the Comprehensive Plan.
(2) Pages 45 -49 of the Comprehensive Plan state the Goals and Policies of the Highway 99
Corridor. They further describe what staff has stated earlier in this report an area with
high traffic volumes and large diversity of uses and development types.
05097rezone sr.doc / 02/09/2007/ Staff Report
Knowles Rezone
File No. R- 2005 -97
Page 4 of 4
b) Conclusion:
(1) Staff believes that rezoning those portions of the property that are zoned BN to BC is
consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan as it relates to the
Highway 99 Corridor.
D. Technical Committee
No comments were received from any department concerning the proposed rezone request.
E. Public Comments
No comments were received on the proposed rezone request.
III. ATTACHMENTS
Attachments 1 through 3:
1. Vicinity and Zoning Map
2. Applicant's Narrative
3, Comprehensive Plan Map of subject parcel
IV. PARTIES OF RECORD
Tony Shapiro Ron Knowles Engineering Division
624 Edmonds Way 18633 17th Ave. NW Fire Department
Edmonds, WA 98020 Shoreline, WA 98177 Parks Division
Planning Division
Public Works Division
05097rezone sr.doc / 02/09/2007/ Staff Report
ryt n.
i:.
I
r -
r
I
i
�.
I
t
I i
.-- '240TH_ PL SW =
I +
_i
T -
I �
i
t � � { t � �• h . � �lt... 111.
± -Ali
N. 205TH
r
n City of Edmonds
.Access Map,
Legend
ZonIng- 2O06_AraO- parcafa
G' + RS -20 Single Family; 20,000 sq. It. lots
RS -12 ShVe Farnfly, 12,000 sq. ft, lots
RS- 110 Stn01e Family, 10.000 sq. h. Iota
RS-8 Single Family, 8,000 eq. h, tots
C}
RS-6 SftW Family, 6,000 sq. h, Iola
RSW-12 Waterfront SiXte Family, 12,00O 3cq It lots
Q RM -2.4 Muhl Family, 2AW sq. It. 01 lot area ;per unit ='CW Ctmvnerctal WaWront
". RM•1.5 Multi Famlly, 1,600 sq. iL o1 lot arse ,per unH ®MPI Master Plan HOside Mixed Use
5OMP2 Master Plan HOside Mixed Use
BP Planned Bustnoss
BN Neiphbodmd Business
6C Community Business
RS-MP $16gle Ferniiy, Master Plan i CG General Coma mial (Max. hL 35 ft.)
CG2 General Comme ciel (Max. hL 45 ft.)
AM-3 MAU Fan-Ay. 3,000 sq. h. of lot area per unh
OL
In
Ci A to chment I
File No. R- 2005 -97
X41' ST ST SW�
�.
I
R
I
Z.
0— .L Pf, 4LI
•
- , - - � - _ -
I l/ 1�y1 � ` 1
■,—"tea , ! ak 1 {.,L
_ 242ND PL SW
Area of Proposed Rezone �
2'4310, 76th Ave. W.
J
-
t � � { t � �• h . � �lt... 111.
± -Ali
N. 205TH
r
n City of Edmonds
.Access Map,
Legend
ZonIng- 2O06_AraO- parcafa
G' + RS -20 Single Family; 20,000 sq. It. lots
RS -12 ShVe Farnfly, 12,000 sq. ft, lots
RS- 110 Stn01e Family, 10.000 sq. h. Iota
RS-8 Single Family, 8,000 eq. h, tots
C}
RS-6 SftW Family, 6,000 sq. h, Iola
RSW-12 Waterfront SiXte Family, 12,00O 3cq It lots
Q RM -2.4 Muhl Family, 2AW sq. It. 01 lot area ;per unit ='CW Ctmvnerctal WaWront
". RM•1.5 Multi Famlly, 1,600 sq. iL o1 lot arse ,per unH ®MPI Master Plan HOside Mixed Use
5OMP2 Master Plan HOside Mixed Use
BP Planned Bustnoss
BN Neiphbodmd Business
6C Community Business
RS-MP $16gle Ferniiy, Master Plan i CG General Coma mial (Max. hL 35 ft.)
CG2 General Comme ciel (Max. hL 45 ft.)
AM-3 MAU Fan-Ay. 3,000 sq. h. of lot area per unh
OL
In
Ci A to chment I
File No. R- 2005 -97
624 Edmonds [Play, Edmonds, WA 98020
July 12, 2005
Mr. Steve Bullock
City of Edmonds
250 5th Avenue North
Edmonds, WA 98020
425.778.5400
Sq
FAX 778.3032
Subject: Rezoning remainder of parcel from BN to BC at 24310 76th Ave. W.
Project: Meridian Mixed Use,
Arch. Project No.: 12382 -00
Request:
This rezone request involves rezoning a portion of the property at 24310 76th
Ave. W. from BN to BC to facilitate the construction of a mixed -use building.
As this property is currently split between two zoning designations and a portion
of the property already falls under the BC classification we see the need for
consistency, and the benefits for all concerned if this property is rezoned.
NARRATIVE ADDRESSING 6 POINT REZONE CRITERIA
I. Comprehensive Plan- Whether the proposal is consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan
The following are excerpts from the Commercial Land Use section of the
Comprehensive Plan
• D.2 Permit uses in neighborhood commercial areas that are intended to
serve the local neighborhood. Mixed -use development should be encouraged
within neighborhood commercial areas.
According to the Comprehensive Plan the use of mixed use buildings are not only
permitted, but also encouraged. However, the said property is currently
designated as part of the Neighborhood Commercial Plan Designation, which
falls under the Neighborhood Business Zone. The Zoning Ordinance limits one
unit per parcel, but this contradicts the Comprehensive Plan's intent to
"encourage" mixed -use projects. As we would like to place a mixed use building
with seven (7) to nine (9) units and 1,500 square feet of retail, we propose the
Neighborhood Commercial section be changed to match the Highway 99 Corridor
.designation, thus allowing the use of multiple units and complying with the
Comprehensive Plan's intent for the development of mixed use.
• C. The intent of the community commercial designation is to recognize both
of these purposes by permitting a range of business and mixed = use
development, while maintaining a neighborhood scale and design chararfer.
Attachment 2
- 2005 -97
File No. R
Page 2
July 12, 2005
Rezone Request
The proposed project meets the goals for Community Commercial Areas by
providing business and mixed -use options as well as maintaining the surrounding
neighborhood community atmosphere. Shifting the plan designation from
Neighborhood Commercial to be included in the Highway 99 Corridor would
allow the property to fall under the Community Commercial designation and
therefore fulfill the Comprehensive Plan and Highway 99 Enhancement Project's
intent of developing mixed -use properties.
The following is an excerpt from the Summary Recommendations section of the
Highway 99 Enhancement Project Report.
• "While some participants preferred that new development reflect the downtown
Edmonds character with smaller shops and architectural details, most
understood that a variety of uses and building types is most appropriate to take
advantage of different opportunities and conditions. r...J In some cases the City
may want to consider zoning changes to encourage mixed use or taller
development. "
As a section of the property is already classified as part of the Highway 99 Corridor
we ask that the property be rezoned from BN to BC to accommodate the placement
of a mixed -use building. We also ask that a section of the property be re- designated
from Neighborhood Commercial to the Highway 99 Corridor (Community
Commercial status) to make for a consistent property parcel.
II. Zoning Ordinance — Whether the proposal is consistent with the purposes of
the Zoning Ordinance and whether the proposal is consistent with the purposes
of the proposed zone district.
BN Zone:
• A. To Reserve areas, for those retail stores, offices, retail service establishments
which offer goods and services needed on an everyday basis by residents of a
neighborhood area;
The Meridian Mixed Use Building has 1,500 square feet designated for retail use to
better serve the surrounding community.
• A.1 Permitted Primary Uses: Single-family dwellings, as regulated in RS -6 zone;
While BN zoning permits mixed use developments and encourages retail space, it
does not allow more than a single - family dwelling, which falls short of the typical
mixed use project and the seven (7) to nine (9) units planned for the Meridian Mixed
Use Building.
BCZone:
• A. To reserve areas for those retail purposes in addition to the general purposes
for business and commercial zones.
Fitting with the intent of the BC Zone Ordinance, 1,500 square feet are designated
for retail purposes in the Meridian Mixed Use Building. Added retail space is much
desired in the already retail based neighborhood. Some of the surrounding buildings
and businesses include a 76 -gas station, storage units, a church, and several single -
family residences. The property now boasts an old convenience store that is no
longer in business. The site is also less than a block away from the City of
Page 3
July 12, 2005
Rezone Request
Shoreline's Interurban Trail Head, and is on the Seattle City Light Trail. A Mixed
Use Building would add to the improvement of the surrounding neighborhood.
• B. To ensure compact, convenient development patterns by allowing uses that
are operated chiefly within buildings.
The site's close proximity to main arterials provides convenient access from the
street, but will not interfere with traffic or cause any hazards. The size of the lot
limits parking. While it offers adequate parking for tenants, employees, and
customers, it will not possess the feeling of a gigantic, obtrusive parking lot.
• C. To allow for mixed -use development which includes multiple dwelling unit(s)
that support business uses.
The rezoning of this property would enable us to carry on plans for the Meridian
Mixed Use Building which has multiple dwelling units. Housing in the surrounding
neighborhood would be enhanced by the addition of quality multiple family housing.
III. Surrounding Area: - the relationship of the proposed zoning change to the
existing land uses and zoning of surrounding or nearby property.
Should the subject property be rezoned, it will not only mesh with the immediate
neighborhood, but will also enhance the quality of the surrounding community.
• The proposed mixed -use building will offer more housing options to a
retail/residential neighborhood where the predominant dwelling currently
consists of single- family residences.
• The site's quality design and landscape will provide a nice transition from the
busy street front of 205t` to the quieter tones of 76th Ave.
• An inactive, run down, site will be replaced with retail space to cater to the
community needs.
• As a part of the Highway 99 Corridor the building will be in keeping with the
spirit of the Highway 99 Enhancement Project by offering an attractive mixed -
use building. The improvement of this lot could also trigger adjacent properties
to redevelop or revamp thus enhancing this small corner of the Highway 99
Corridor.
IV. Changes: - whether there has been sufficient change in the character of the
immediate surrounding area or in City policy to justify the rezone.
Under the Highway 99 Enhancement Project, many changes have been made to
improve the Highway 99 Corridor. As stated in the Enhancement Project Report,
mixed -use facilities are "encouraged." The immediate surrounding neighborhood
contains many housing options including single- family residences and a multi-
family complex. We feel that rezoning the discussed parcel from BN to BC will
enable us to continue the trend toward higher density within the context of a
residential area, while adding commercial space to better serve the local community.
Granting a rezone will also allow us to support the progress being made to the
Highway 99 Corridor.
Page 4
July 12, 2005
Rezone Request
V. Suitability: - Whether the property is economically and physically suitable
for the uses allowed under the existing zoning, and under the proposed
zoning.
The property's close proximity to 205th St. allows it to contribute to one of the
gateways of Edmonds; and being situated so closely to the main arterials of
Edmonds Way and Highway 99 naturally labels this property as best suited for
commercial use. However many of the surrounding properties have been built as
residential, and Edmonds is mainly a residential community. We believe that the
proposed mix of both residential and commercial achieves the best use of this
property in serving the needs of the community and enables our client to achieve the
highest economic return for his investments.
VI. Value: - the relative gain to the public health, safety and welfare compared to
the potential increase or decrease in value to the property owners.
As the property is located so close to busy arterials the placement of single family
homes is unsafe and undesirable. At the same time the convenient location
promotes commercial use. The placement of a mixed -use building would create a
nice transition between the busy streets and residential neighborhood. Underground
parking facilities also create a safe parking environment for residents and employees
while increasing the amount of parking available. The existing structure on the site
currently decreases the value of the property and of the surrounding community.
Replacing the vacant, strip retail building with a higher end mixed use building
would improve the value of the property for the owner, and brighten the tone of the
neighborhood. The increased density also helps the City of Edmonds comply with
the GMA mandates with denser housing that has access to bus and transit lines.
ma n
Iva
N�
mm
OM
A mom
6�t- ae�fll
s 1"°c
..,�
NMI
vfft
q7A�a
On
4ht
L t Y_.,...- i ..i (A''''� >9re ' 13. £8 ✓ r" �"6.i Orin j-
r
�@,�'s��yq,7`i �a� `• 1� .". � •pipe Q��j
I. y'i t43 4;L::e57 .-�'1 '..,� . Gd Pd
��gg t
nm
v
><'� t - �!91•
VP aaa
Gr t$
1 3 3y Y7. ••t G �f l� xr lji� 1 �
{ +�.. ::
`y3�
I f r
ma n
Iva
N�
mm
OM
A mom
6�t- ae�fll
s 1"°c
..,�
NMI
vfft
q7A�a
On
4ht
L t Y_.,...- i ..i (A''''� >9re ' 13. £8 ✓ r" �"6.i Orin j-
r
�@,�'s��yq,7`i �a� `• 1� .". � •pipe Q��j
I. y'i t43 4;L::e57 .-�'1 '..,� . Gd Pd
��gg t
nm
v
J
- CL
I rt"-_ F-
City of Edmonds
Comprehensive Plan Map
hm wawar.n. = i1q.n.n.....» Nw orrta.
�M�Irl..Y 'FlA.yyP.l► HrFO� +��
�VU'a`MrrM" uYr�KiO�
1
?L-SW- _ �-- - J - ..1►`°'`
241ST ST Sw --
s
w
w
>
,242ND PL SW
Attachment 3
File No. R- 2005 -97
STATE OF WASHINGTON,
COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH
SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. 3642
o t e iry o mon s, as mgton
On the 8th day of May, 2007, the City Council of the City of
Edmonds, passed Ordinance No. 3642. A summary of the
content of said ordinance, consisting of the title, provides as
follows:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHING-
TON, APPROVING THE REZONE OF CERTAIN REAL
PROPERTY LOCATED AT 24310 76TH AVENUE WEST'
FROM NEIGHBORHOOD BUSINESS (BN)N TO COMMU-
A D CONCLUSIONS OF LLAW, IND FIXING A TIME WHEN
THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE.
The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed epon request.
DATED this 9th day of May, 2007,
Published: May 13, 2007. i
CITY CLERK, SAN&AA S. CHASE
Affidavit of Publication
S.S.
The undersigned, being first duly sworn on oath deposes and says that she is Principal Clerk of
THE HERALD, a daily newspaper printed and published in the City of Everett, County of
Snohomish, and State of Washington; that said newspaper is a newspaper of general
circulation in said County and State; that said newspaper has been approved as a legal
newspaper by order of the Superior Court of Snohomish County and that the notice
Summary of Ordinance No. 3642
City of Edmonds
a printed copy of which is hereunto'attached, was published in said newspaper proper and not
in supplement form, in the regular and entire edition of said paper on the following days and
times, namely:
May 13, 2007
and that said newspaper was regularly distributed to its subscribers during all of said period.
Principal Clerk
Subscribed and sworn to before me this 14th
RECEIVED
day of May, 2007 -�� Sg1ONE Xp�9FO`j
s
MAY 18 2007 Q N°
gL1C
`���p (��r� CLERK Notary Public ' and fort State of Washington, residing at Everett, Snoh ish_A�_20013
EDMUNDS l �l l 1 CLERK County. y
sT�r� of wPS���
Account Name: City of Edmonds Account Number: 101416 Order Number. 0001503404