Loading...
2017-10-12 Hearing Examiner AgendaAgenda Edmonds Hearing Examiner . ,HyCOUNCIL CHAMBERS 250 5TH AVE NORTH, EDMONDS, WA 98020 OCTOBER 12, 2017, 3:00 PM CALL TO ORDER II. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Loft Appeal of Notice of Violation APL20170001 2. Jenkins Lane Five Lot Subdivision (PLN20170028) III. ADJOURN Edmonds Hearing Examiner Agenda October 12, 2017 Page 1 2.1 Hearing Examiner Agenda Item Meeting Date: 10/12/2017 Loft Appeal of Notice of Violation APL20170001 Staff Lead: Leif Bjorback Department: Development Services Prepared By: Leif Bjorback Background/History See attached Staff Report Staff Recommendation Deny the appeal. Narrative The appellant (The Loft Cafe) is requesting the appeal of a Notice of Violation issued by the Building Official in regards to the removal of an open air wood and plastic roof structure that was constructed without the required permit. More specifically, the appellant has agreed to comply with the notice but wishes to extend the deadline stated within the notice to remove the structure in order to reduce anticipated financial hardship. Attachments: Loft Staff Report Packet Pg. 2 2.1.a BUILDING DIVISION REPORT & RECOMMENDATION TO THE HEARING EXAMINER Project: File Number: Date of Report: Reviewed By: The Loft Cafe Appeal of Notice of Violation APL20170001 October 5, 2017 Leif Bjorback Building Official Public Hearing: October 12, 2015 at 3:00 P.M. Edmonds Public Safety Complex: Council Chambers 250 51h Avenue North, Edmonds WA 98020 I. SUMMARY OF APPEAL The appellant (The Loft Cafe) is requesting the appeal of a Notice of Violation issued by the Building Official in regards to the removal of an open air wood and plastic roof structure that was constructed without the required permit. More specifically, the appellant has agreed to comply with the notice but wishes to extend the deadline stated within the notice to remove the structure in order to reduce anticipated financial hardship. II. GENERAL INFORMATION 1. Owner: The Loft Cafe 2. Appellant: Niko Raptis 3. Location: 515 Main Street (Attachment 4) 4. Existing Use: Restaurant 5. Proposed Use: No change 1 Packet Pg. 3 2.1.a III. PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE A "Notice of Application and Public Hearing" was published in the Herald Newspaper, posted at the subject site, as well as the Public Safety Complex, Community Development Department, and the Library on September 27, 2017. Notices were also mailed to property owners within 300 feet of the site on September 27, 2017. See Attachment 9 for this notice documentation. The City has complied with the noticing provisions of ECDC 20.03 and RCW 36.70.B.110(3). IV. TECHNICAL COMMITTEE This application was reviewed and evaluated by the City's Fire Marshal, the Building Official and the Development Services Department Director. These same individuals collaborated upon the previous decision to post the Notice of Violation on August 29, 2017. All three parties agree that the content of the notice is accurate and should be upheld. V. PUBLIC COMMENTS To date, no public comments have been received. VI. APPLICABLE CODES: 1. International Building Code (IBC), 2015 edition. A. Section 105.1 (Permits) Required. B. Chapter 7 Fire and Smoke Protection Features C. Section 1604 General Design Requirements (for structural design.) D. Chapter 29 Plastic E. The above referenced codes are just a sampling of the relevant code provisions of the IBC that the current unpermitted structure does not meet. These issues have been discussed with the applicant and his design team, such that any new structure will need to incorporate all relevant provisions of the building code. VII. BACKGROUND On or about the year 2008, Mr. Raptis took ownership of the Loft Cafe. He has told the City that at that time the wood framed roof structure was already in place but that he had the plastic roof panels installed himself soon after occupancy in order to better protect the patio space from weather. About this same time, Mr. Raptis obtained a building permit and final inspection for some minor unrelated alterations to the building and courtyard. The City approved plans for this alteration permit do not indicate the presence of the roof structure as would be expected. It is the belief of the City that the roof structure and the plastic panels were installed without the required building permits. It is unknown as to whether the City's Building Division was aware of the unpermitted structure, or if so, why no enforcement actions were taken at that time. In October of 2013, a pre -application meeting was held at the request of Mr. Raptis, the purpose of which was to discuss the city's requirements for the installation of a small Packet Pg. 4 2.1.a extension of the northern portion of the roof structure in the Loft courtyard. After the meeting, the building official discussed with Mr. Raptis the likelihood that the existing overhead roof structure had not been permitted, and would need to be addressed. The building official had become aware of this matter during his preparation for the pre - application meeting, which included research of pertinent records for the property. Within the next several days, the building official and then -Fire Marshal John Westfall met with Mr. Raptis on site and reaffirmed the need for permits and corrections of the structure. This was understood and agreed to by Mr. Raptis at that time. After not hearing from Mr. Raptis for more than 2 months, an Order to Correct was issued to him on January 17, 2014, for failure to obtain the permits required for the overhead roof structure. The Order required that application be made to the City for either a) demolition of the roof structure or b) construction of a new code compliant roof structure, within approximately 10 weeks, with obtaining of the permit and completion of the work also within a determined time frame. (See Attachment 1) Prior to the application deadline, Mr. Raptis visited the City on several occasions, and discussed with the building official options as to how to comply with the order and the building code. These discussions led the building official to believe that progress was being made to resolve the matter. During these discussions several key building code issues were raised that seemed unreasonable and excessive to Mr. Raptis. In response to Mr. Raptis' concerns, the building official applied to the International Code Council for an expert code opinion concerning these issues and found that his understanding of the requirements was confirmed. (See Attachment 1) During this time, the application deadline passed, and after not hearing from Mr. Raptis for several months, a second Order to Correct was issued on November 5, 2014 addressing the same violation and containing similar response requirements as the first order, with an application deadline of January 5, 2015. (See Attachment 1) Mr. Raptis responded to the second order by leaving a voicemail message on January 15, 2015 for the building official saying he was working on the project. Then, on January 21, he came into the permit center along with a contractor to discuss building code and permit application submittal requirements. He stated that he will submit his application within two weeks. On February 17, Mr. Raptis phoned the building official to say he is getting bids from two architects for a project design, and he will let the building official know how long it will be until the plans and application will be ready to submit. On March 8, Mr. Raptis came into the permit counter along with an architect and a structural engineer and the question was asked regarding the City's objectives for the project. The building official said the City's objectives are simply to a) meet code and b) (in light of the existing violation) perform the project in a timely manner. He also clarified that, beyond meeting the requirements of the code, design options were up to the applicant. At this meeting, no assurances were given as to the timing of the next response, and the building official was again led to believe that progress was being made to resolve the matter. On December 14, 2015, after not hearing further from Mr. Raptis for several months, the building official and then -Fire Marshal Westfall visited Mr. Raptis at the Loft. During the visit, they indicated that if no application was received by January 31, 2016, the City would issue a Notice of Violation that would carry monetary fines with it. On January 15, the building official received an email message from Ryan Rhodes Design (Rhodes) as an introduction to their firm having been retained by Mr. Raptis to provide and coordinate 3 Packet Pg. 5 2.1.a design services for the Loft project. The message contained building code scenarios and pertinent questions suggesting that a serious attempt was being made to provide a viable design to meet code requirements. This email message proved to be the beginning of a healthy and professional exchange of information with the City that spanned several months and again led the building official to believe that finally, serious progress was being made to resolve the violation. By May of 2016 Rhodes had produced a set of preliminary building plans that appeared to substantially meet code requirements, although it was not quite ready for submittal as a permit application. A brief email exchange between the building official and Rhodes on June 3 advised that a "full package" permit submittal would be turned in shortly. On September 28, 2016, after not hearing from Rhodes or Mr. Raptis for several months, the building official sent an email reminder to turn in his application, with a deadline of October 17, or a Notice of Violation would be issued. On October 17, the building official received an email message from Rhodes stating that they were currently no longer actively designing the project, but were, along with the structural designer, awaiting instruction from Mr. Raptis before proceeding. On November 15, 2016, a Notice of Violation (See Attachment 1) was issued addressing the same violation and containing similar response requirements as the previous orders, with an application deadline of November 29. Mr. Raptis emailed the building official the same day stating that he had just retained a structural engineer, who was going to need 4- 5 weeks to produce the structural portion of the design. On November 16, Mr. Raptis proposed and the building official agreed to a new deadline for application of January 6, 2017. On January 5, Mr. Raptis emailed a request to extend the deadline until the end of January, as the architect needed more time to finish the drawings. The building official agreed to this request. On January 30, Rhodes sent an email to the building official with a progress update and assuring that the application will be made within the next couple of weeks. On February 22, the building official emailed Mr. Raptis that the application must be received by the end of the week. On February 23, 2017 Mr. Raptis submitted a full and complete application for a building permit to "(Demolish) existing non -compliant patio cover and construct new." It was then expected that Mr. Raptis would comply with Corrective Action item #3 on the November 15 Notice of Violation which states "Complete the specified permitted work and obtain final approval by the City Building Inspector and Fire Marshal within the standard time frame allowed for the permit." For purposes of the application stage of the process, this time frame would allow 6 months in which to have the application reviewed by the City, and once approved, the permit would then be paid for and issued. The City then performed plan review of the project, and in early April, review comments were sent to the applicant from both the Building and Engineering divisions, requiring corrections to the plans before they could approve the application. A brief email exchange occurred shortly thereafter, to provide some clarification of the review comments from the Building Division. On May 22, an email reminder was sent to Mr. Raptis and Rhodes requesting a response to the review comments in a timely manner, and reminding of the approaching application deadline of August 22. On that same day, Rhodes emailed the building official saying they were not currently proceeding with design of the project. On August 11, another email reminder was sent, to which a similar response was received from Rhodes. 4 Packet Pg. 6 2.1.a After no further response was received, the permit application expired on August 22. On August 29, a new Notice of Violation was issued addressing the same violation; however, the corrective actions required were limited to the demolition of the roof structure and the restoration of the outdoor dining area to its previously permitted configuration (under City permit BLD2008-0462, see Attachment 8) within 30 days of the notice. (See Attachment 1) After the notice was issued, there were responses from both Rhodes and Mr. Raptis asking for clarification and reconsideration of the 30 day requirement. Following discussions with Mr. Raptis that involved the building official, the fire marshal and the development services director, Mr. Raptis was told that the structure would need to be removed as directed in the notice. Mr. Raptis appealed the August 29, 2017 Notice of Violation on September 5, 2017. VIII. DISCUSSION The intent of the building code is to establish regulations providing for the safety, health and general welfare of building occupants, as well as for fire fighters and emergency responders during building emergencies. The desire of the City during this 4 year period has only been to provide for public safety as regulated by the code. Although the orders and notices issued to the Loft state the violation as being the failure to obtain the required permit for work being performed, it has been apparent to the City that there are several significant deficiencies to the current construction that do not meet the technical requirements of the building code and will need to be corrected. These deficiencies represent potential life safety hazards. In general terms, these come under two main categories, that of Fire Protection, and Structural Design. Without a valid building permit and the associated inspection process, it is not possible for the City to ensure that safety standards are met in the facility. The fact that the most recent Notice of Violation focuses mainly on the removal of the non - permitted roof structure was an attempt by the City to simplify the directives given in the notice, since whether the roof was replaced with a code compliant structure or simply removed, in either case it would have to be demolished. It should be noted that the City has made every effort to work with Mr. Raptis, allowing him repeated delays in bringing his building into compliance. The allowances were initially given because of the amount of time that had passed since the work had been completed, and in an attempt to give Mr. Raptis reasonable time to design and complete the project. However, given the repeated requests for additional time, and the apparent lack of response to City directives, the City is no longer willing to allow any further delay on this matter. IX. RECOMMENDATION Based on the analysis and attachments to this report, staff recommends DENIAL of the request to extend the deadline for demolition of the structure. X. PARTIES OF RECORD City of Edmonds 5 Packet Pg. 7 2.1.a 121 — 51h Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 Niko Raptis, c/o The Loft Cafe 515 Main Street Edmonds, WA 98020 XI. ATTACHMENTS 1. Violation Notices and Orders 2. Applicant Statement 3. Email Notices and Correspondence 4. Vicinity Map 5. BLD2017-0274 Permit Application Form 6. BLD2017-0274 Permit Application screen shot 7. Building Division Review Comments 8. Approved Patio Floor Plan 9. Public Notice Documentation Packet Pg. 8 2.1.a CITY OF EDMONDS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT 121 5th Avenue North, Edmonds, WA 98020 (425) 7710220 N OTICE OF CA'IL V10"LATION Location of Violation 515 Suite A Main St Edmonds WA 98020 Issued To: t e Lon Address of Person Notice is Issued To: 5 15 Suite A Main St Edmonds WA 98020 Code Section(s) Violated: g Code Section 105.1 Description of Violation: 1 Ex ansion of outdoor dinin area without first obtaining the required Pennits. and 2 Cor:struction of roof structure over atio without first obtaining the re uired er�nits. Corrective Action Required: As er pre Jous orders issued on ]anuai 14 2014 November S. 2014 and November 15 2016, 1 No later than Se tember 29 2017 demolishh the roof structure and restore the outdoor diuin area to the reviousl permitted configuration. A b ading Rermit a roved and issued by the C, of Edmonds will be mquired nor to the demolition. All associated fees must be paid in order to obtain the ermit. Final inspection and a —oval must be obtained no later than Se tember 29 2017. t: Be advised, the person(s) to whom this Notice is issued must correct the violation(s) and shall be assessed a $1.00.00 fine. The imposed monetary penalties are immediately due and payable to the City of Edmonds at 121 5th Avenue North, Edmonds, WA 98020 during normal City business hours. The City intends to issue a new Notice of Violation if the above -referenced violation(s) remain uncorrected, and $100 per day fines shall continue to accrue under each Notice of Violation until this matter is resolved to the satisfaction of the City. Failure to comply may result in an order to not occupy the outdoor dining area. Further, if application is not made by 4:00 m on September 29 2_ _017an abatement notice may be issued warning of impending City abatement of the violation. Any and all costs, including incidental costs, will be added to the monetary penalties assessed against the person(s) to whom the Notice is issued. Note, this decision is appealable to the City of Edmonds Hearing Examiner by filing a complete appeal application including written notice of appeal with the Development Services Director no later than September 5 2017 at 4:00 p.m. The appeal filing fee is $880.00. Date Posted: August 29, 2017 Date Issuing Party: Leif B'orback Title: BuildingBuiLding Official Attachment 1 Packet Pg. 9 2.1.a CITY OF EDMONDS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT 121 5th Avenue North, Edmonds, WA 98020 (425) 771 0220 NOTICE OF CIVIL VIOLATION Location of Violation 515 Suite A Main St Edmonds WA 98020 Issued To: Address of Person Notice is Issued To: 515 Suite A, Main St, Edmonds, WA 98020 Code Section(s) Violated: International Building Code Section 105.1 _ Description of Violation: 1) Expan__s vn_ of outdoor dining area without i-lrst obtaining the required permits, and 2) Construction of roof structure over patio without first obtaining the required permits. _ Corrective Action Required: As per previous orders issued on .ianua[y 14, 2014 and November 5, 2014, 1) No later than November 29, 2016 submit a full and complete buildingpermit application for either: A) the demolition of the roof structure and restoring the outdoor dining „area . to the previously permitted configuration-, or b) the construction of code compliant roof and wall structure and alterations to the outdoor dining, area, and. 2) Pay all associated fees and obtain the building_ permit. within the normailyprescribedapplication timelines.. 3 Complete the s ecitied permitted work and obtain final approval by the Cqy Building Inspector and Fire Marshal within the standard time frame allowed for the permit, Be advised, the person(s) to whom this Notice is issued must correct the violation(s) and shall be assessed a $100.00 line. The imposed monetary penalties are immediately due and payable to the City of Edmonds at 121 5th Avenue North, Edmonds, WA 98020 during normal City business hours. The City intends to issue a new Notice of Violation if the above -referenced violation(s) remain uncorrected, and fines shall continue to accrue under each Notice of Violation until this matter is resolved to the satisfaction of the City. Further, if application is not made by_4:000pm on November 29, 2016 an abatement notice may be issued warning of impending City abatement of the violation. Any and all costs, including incidental costs, will be added to the monetary penalties assessed against the person(s) to whom the Notice is issued. Note, this decision is appealable to the City of Edmonds Hearing Examiner by filing a complete appeal application including written notice of appeal with the Development Services Director no later than November 22, 2016 at 4:00 p.m. The appeal filing fee is $705.00. Date Posted: November 15, 2016 Date Mailed: Issuing Party: Leif B'.orbaclt Title: Building Official Attachment 1 1Packet Pg. 10 2.1.a CITY OF EDMONDS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT 121 5th Avenue North, Edmonds, WA 98020 (425) 771-0220 REVISED ORDER TO CORRECT VIOLATION Location of Violation (Address): 515 Suite A. Main St, Edmonds, WA 98020 Issued To: The Loft Address Of Person This Order Is Issued To: 515 Suite A, Main St, Edmonds, WA 98020 Code Section Violated: International Building Code Section 105.1 Description of Violation: 1) Expansion of outdoor dining area without first obtaining the required permits, and 2) Construction of roof structure over patio without first obtaining the required permits. Corrective Action Required: 1) No later than January 5, 2015, submit a full and complete building permit application for either: a) the demolition of the roof structure and restoring the outdoor dining area to the previously_ permitted configuration; yr b) the construction of a code compliant roof and wall structure and alterations to the outdoor dining area, and 2) No later than February 5, 2015, pay all associated fees and obtain the building_ permit, and 3 Complete the specified work and obtain final approval by the Cily Building Inspector and Fire Marshal within the standard time frame allowed for the permit. Correction is Required no later than: close of business (time) as stated above. (date) If correction is not made by the dates and times specified in the Order, a Notice of Civil Violation shall be issued. The Notice of Civil Violation shall assess fines of $100.00 per day, or portion of a day, during which the violation continues. Date Posted: Issuing Party Leif W Signature F Date Mailed: November 5 2014 Date Served Title Building Official Attachment 1 Packet Pg. 11 Inc. 1890 CITY OF EDMONDS 121 5th AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (425) 771-0220 • FAX (425) 771-0221 www.edmondswa.gov DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT December 5, 2014 The Loft Attn: Niko Raptis 515-A Main Street Edmonds, WA 98020 Re: Unpermitted Patio Roof Structure Dear Mr. Raptis, 2.1.a DAVE EARLING MAYOR In January of this year I sent you an Order to Correct Violation notice requiring you to take action on the unpermitted roof structure at your restaurant. Following that notice, you and I had some initial discussions that led me to believe progress was being made toward resolving the matter, but I have not heard from you in quite a few months, and the July 31 deadline for compliance as stated an the notice has long since passed. Further, I have recently obtained an expert Opinion from the International Code Council addressing building code requirements that will need to be met if you are to keep the structure. I have attached a copy of the opinion with this letter. I have also enclosed with this letter a revised Order to Correct Violation notice. This notice includes a timeline for you to follow in order to avoid further code enforcement actions. We at the City would certainly prefer to work with you. cooperatively than to have the matter escalate and. involve our code enforcement officer. Please contact me soon to advise me of your intentions. Regards, � V r Leif jorback Building Official City of Edmonds (425) 771-0220 Cc: File John Westfall, Fire Marshal fSncisoterX1rae�� Au� 1890 �n�Japan Packet Pg. 12 2.1.a Bjorback, Leif WENOMM From: Doug Connell <DConnell@iccsafe.org> Sent: Monday, August 18, 2014 12:59 PM To: Lis Valdemarsen Cc: Bjorback, Leif Subject: RE: 12 IBC 704.10, Table 602 & 2609 (DC) Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged August 18, 2014 Subject: 09 IBC Table 602, Section 704.10, 903.2.1.2, 2609.2, 2609.3 and 2609.4 Background: The owner of an existing A2 restaurant wants to put a roof cover over his outdoor dining area. The building is type VB non-sprinklered construction and is built right to the property line, adjacent to a CMU building on the next lot. The outdoor dining area also adjoins the property line. • They also want to use as much light transmitting plastic paneling as possible in the roof for natural lighting. Q1: Would IBC 704.10 apply for the framing and roof, sending you to Table 602, requiring construction within 30 feet of the PL to be 1 hour? Al: Actually 704.10 would apply to columns or structural members inside an exterior wall or exterior to the exterior wall. Table 602 does apply as well as Section 705.8. Proposed open shed construction is governed by Table 602 and Section 705.8. That is you cannot build an open shed up to the property line. You must provide an exterior wall unless Table 602 does not require a fire rating or Section 705.8 allows unlimited openings in the wall. The code will require a one -hour fire -resistance rated exterior wall at the property line and depending on the roof construction a 30 inch high parapet wall. The roof construction could be non -protected. Q2: I see what seem to be serious restrictions on Type CC1 light transmitting panels in 2609 that require 4 feet between panels and limit the panels to no more than 30% of the roof area. Am I reading these IBC sections correctly? A2: Yes, that is correct. However, if the building is sprinklered then there is no required separation between panels and the area of plastic panels is limited to 60% of the floor below. However, Section 2609.3 requires that the plastic panels be at least 6 ft. from the exterior wall. Q3: Do you see any other problems or possible code solutions? Let me know if you need more specific information very much appreciate your time and input. A3: Yes, with the roof over the "outdoor" area the fire area is extended and Section 903.2.1.2 will require sprinklers if the new fire area is over 5,000 sq.ft. or if the combined occupancy of the Group A2 occupancy is over 100 persons. Code opinions issued by ICC staff are based on ICC published codes and do not include local, state or federal codes, policies or amendments. This opinion is based on the information which you have provided. We have made no independent effort to verify the accuracy of this information nor have we conducted a review beyond the scope of your question. This opinion does not imply approval of an equivalency, specific product, specific design, or specific installation and cannot be published in any form implying such approval by the International Code Council. As this opinion is only advisory, the final decision is the responsibility of the designated authority charged with the administration and enforcement of this code. James D. Connell, P.E. Team Leader, A & E Services International Code Council, Inc. Birmingham District Office 0 0 0 ti r O N J a. Q r_ 0 r 0 0 0 W 0 z 0 as a Q. Q 0 J r L 0 a m a U) 0 J r C m E a Attachment 1 1Packet Pg. 13 2.1.a building on the next lot. The outdoor dining area also adjoins the property line. • Would IBC 704.10 apply for the framing and roof, sending you to Table 602, requiring construction within 30 feet of the PL to be 1 hour? • They also want to use as much light transmitting plastic paneling as possible in the roof for natural lighting. I see what seem to be serious restrictions on these panels in 2609 that require 4 feet between panels and limit the panels to no more than 30% of the roof area. Am I reading these IBC sections correctly? Do you see any other problems or possible code solutions? Let me know if you need more specific information. I very much appreciate your time and input. Thank you! Status: New View article... Join us in Fort Lauderdale for ICUs 2014 Public Comment Hearings in September. Experience cdpACCESS in action and help ensure the 2015 International Green Construction Codes achieve the best in energy, water and cost efficiencies from sustainable construction. Register_now. 0 0 0 ti 0 N J a Q 0 r 0 0 a� 0 z 4- 0 as a a Q 0 J Attachment 1 1Packet Pg. 14 2.1.a CITY OF EDMONDS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT 121 5th Avenue North, Edmonds, WA 98020 (425) 771-0220 ORDER TO CORRECT VIOLATION Location of Violation (Address): 515 Suite A Main St. Edmonds WA 98020 Issued To: The Loft Address Of Person This Order Is Issued To: 515 Suite A, Main St, Edmonds, WA 98020 Code Section Violated: International Building Code Section 105.1 Description of Violation:_ 1) Expansion of outdoor dining area without first obtaining the required permits, and 2 Construction of roof structure over patio without first obtaining the required permits. Corrective Action Required: 1) No later than March 31, 2014, submit a full and complete buildingpermit annlication for either: _a) the demolition of the roof structure and restoring the outdoor dining area to the previously_ ermitted configuration, or b) the construction of a code compliant roof structure and alterations to the outdoor dining area, and 2) No later than April 30 2014 pay all associated fees and obtain the building_permit, and 3) Complete the specified work and obtain final approval by the City Building Inspector and Fire Marshal no later than July 31, 2014 Correction is Required no later than: its stated above. (time) (date) If correction is not made by the dates and times specified in the Order, a Notice of Civil Violation shall be issued. The Notice of Civil Violation shall assess fines of $100.00 per day, or portion of a day, during which the violation continues. Date Posted: Date Mailed: JanuM 17 2014. Date Served Issuing Party Leif Worback Title _Building Official Signature Attachment 1 Packet Pg. 15 IhC. 1890 CITY OF EDMONDS 121 5th AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (425) 771-0220 • FAX (425) 771-0221 www.admondswa.gov DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT January 17, 2014 The Loft Attn: Niko Raptis 515-A Main Street Edmonds, WA 98020 Re: Unpermitted Patio Roof Structure Dear Mr. Raptis, 2.1.a DAVE EARLING MAYOR Thank you for meeting with Fire Marshal John Westfall and me back in October at your establishment The Loft. During our visit we spoke about your proposed new roof structure adjacent to the catering building, and we also discussed the existing roof structure covering the outdoor dining area and the fact that it has been in place for several years without having first obtained the required building permits. During this discussion you seemed to show a genuine interest in bringing your facility into full compliance with the building codes by obtaining the needed permits and making any alterations necessary in order to achieve compliance. We certainly appreciate your cooperation in resolving this matter. In order to initiate the process of resolving this matter, I am enclosing with this letter an "Order to Correct Violation" notice. This notice includes a timeline established by the City for you to follow in order to avoid further code enforcement actions. We at the City would certainly prefer to work with you cooperatively than to have the matter escalate and involve our code enforcement officer. John and I intend to continue to make ourselves available to assist you in your efforts. Thanks again for your cooperation. Please contact me if you should have any questions. Regards, Leif jorback Building Official City of Edmonds (425) 771-0220 Cc: File John Westfall, Fire Marshal Incorporated August 11, 1890 Sister O h ;An! Japan Packet Pg. 16 2.1.a 9130 GONloF�S �A �� a2fd Appee;d reasons 56 441: F�* T% c & S 17- • eQ-L-1a-> wA I B 0 , OF "V I `-, V1.3LA T,o►j, 1. Financial hardship 2. Luck of business revenue due to courtyard closure and elirnin�.!,'twl c1l spaca. 3. Employe elimination due to luck of business 4. usir,�,ess have been operating under the same structure since+lje,veq begin-,r)ing 'Aug 2008) with a valid occupancy permit and' L,.iush s�era,�e. 5. �.Ne oniy as -king to extend the demolition of courtyard structure �-n-t11 janual,y. I- pis will help us during Holiday season to generate nv►�n' gee � t -,e able to survive the months we will be close enoI,at-iori, Thank your,! rV-0 QA n c I' S Attachment 2 Packet Pg. 17 2.1.a Bjorback, Leif From: Bjorback, Leif Sent: Friday, February 5, 2016 10:23 AM To: 'Ryan Rhodes' Cc: 'info The Loft'; Michael; Zweber, Kevin (Fire District Address); Brandon; Thornquist, Linda; Johns, Kristin Subject: RE: The Loft - 515 Suite A Ryan, I appreciate the update and such a quick response. For the pre -application meeting (we call the free version a DRC) check out the link to our form here: http://edmondswa.gov/images/COE/Services/Permits and Development/Forms and Handouts/PRE- AP B58 w fields.pdf The DRC meetings are held on Thursday afternoons and must be scheduled at least a week in advance, along with your review documents. After you read through the form, please contact one of our permit coordinators at 425 771-0220 to schedule. Thanks, Leif From: Ryan Rhodes[mailto:ryan@ryanrhodesdesigns.com] Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2016 4:49 PM To: Bjorback, Leif Cc: 'info The Loft'; Michael; Zweber, Kevin (Fire District Address); Brandon Subject: RE: The Loft - 515 Suite A Leif I actually had an email written up for you yesterday... but I must've not hit "send". We spent the past week working out contracts, etc so that we could begin work in earnest. Yesterday, we were on site doing all the as - built measuring of the entire space, so that we can begin designs. We think we'll need all of next week to get some design options put together for Niko. Unfortunately, I am out of town next week, but Brandon in my office (cc'd) is going to spearhead the effort. And I hope that we will have designs to show Niko the following week. Once we have arrived at a design, we will schedule the pre - application meeting you suggest. I cannot find anywhere on the Edmonds Website where it talks about how to schedule this appointment — is this something we just call to arrange? Do you know what the lead time for that type of meeting is... perhaps if the meetings are out a few weeks, we should schedule it now? At any rate, we're actively working on the project as of yesterday. And we'll likely not be ready for a pre-app till the end of the week of February 151h. Then, I do not know how long it takes to get feedback from the City — but assuming we'd get approval on the design/approach, we could move directly into structural engineering. The structural engineers we usually work with are currently at least 4 weeks out. So that gets us into March, unless we can convince an engineer to fit us into their schedule. My gut would be that we would be ready to submit for permits by the end of March first of April. That's the update, please let Brandon and/or me know if there's anything else you need information -wise in the meantime. Thanks Ryan Rhodes R Y A N R H O D E S DESIGNS a Attachment 3 1Packet Pg. 18 2.1.a 303 NICKERSON STREET I SEATTLE, WA 1 98109 phone 206.632.1818 cell206.718.3477 www.rvanrhodesdesions.com From: Bjorback, Leif[mailto:Leif.Bjorback@edmondswa.gov] Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2016 4:35 PM To: Ryan Rhodes <ryan@ryanrhodesdesigns.com> Cc: 'info The Loft' <info@theloftlounge.com>; Michael<michael@ryanrhodesdesigns.com>; Zweber, Kevin (Fire District Address) <kzweber@firedistrictl.org> Subject: RE: The Loft - 515 Suite A Rya n, It's been a couple of weeks and I have not heard back from you as to your timeline and approach. Will you please send me an update? Thanks. Leif From: Bjorback, Leif Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2016 8:42 AM To: 'Ryan Rhodes' Cc: info The Loft; Michael; Zweber, Kevin (Fire District Address) Subject: RE: The Loft - 515 Suite A Hi Ryan, I apologize for not getting right back to you. Monday was a holiday and this has been a crazy week. Thank you for your message and for clearly breaking down each of your possible scenarios. I did a quick verification of your code rationale and find no major flaws with the conclusions made in either of your approaches. As for your question on the timing of submittals, I realize that there is some time involved in the design process, including coordination with a structural engineer, etc., so I would first ask you what a reasonable amount of time should a be allowed in order for you to prepare a complete submittal? ca Once your application is received, our initial project review would likely take several weeks, at which time you might receive comments from the various reviewing departments, or ideally, approval of the permit. I would highly r J recommend that you schedule a pre -application meeting with the City, once you have a preliminary design to discuss, where we can get all of the reviewing departments involved in a discussion and identify significant issues that you will want to be aware of before preparing a full submittal. We offer pre -application meetings that are formal where you pay E a fee, as well as a less formal version that is free of charge. Please coordinate this meeting with one of our permit coordinators at the permit center. Q Let me know if you have any further questions. Thanks, leif Bjorhac( Building Official City of Edmonds (425) 771-0220 x 1380 Development Services Permit Center Hours: Monday, Tuesday, Thursday & Friday 8:00 AM — 4:30 PM Closed on Wednesdays (Phone lines are open) Attachment 3 1Packet Pg. 19 2.1.a From: Ryan Rhodes[mailto:ryan@ryanrhodesdesigns.com] Sent: Friday, January 15, 2016 5:26 PM To: Bjorback, Leif Cc: info The Loft; Michael Subject: The Loft - 515 Suite A Mr. Bjorback, We have been engaged by the owner of The Loft Restaurant, Niko Raptis, to help navigate and hopefully correct the current "situation" regarding his outdoor courtyard. We fully understand the basis of the violation notice, but we're hoping you can answer a few questions that might help us reach an expeditious close to the matter. First: Although we've only been involved since yesterday, we're well aware of the City's urgency to correct the violation. Our hope is that since the matter is now actively being addressed, there's some leniency in turn -around. My questions with regard to timing are: How long do we really have to submit our solution for permits, and how long is the City of Edmonds' turn -around from submittal to permit issuance? We don't have specific experience working with the City of Edmonds, so some help understanding the time frames associated with permit reviews would be super helpful for us. Second: We've spent the day doing code research surrounding the specific issues and have made some conclusions. I realize that we can make those conclusions, and plow ahead with permit submittals, but since this is such an urgent matter (and I know the owner is sensitive to cost), we are hoping that we can share those conclusions with you and get a determination if one or both solutions to the violation are valid and/or which solution would be looked upon more favorably. Here are the code issues with two separate conclusions/recommendations: Code Issues: Per Table 602 the subject VB structure with group A occupancy would require a 1 hr rated wall if constructed closer than 10'-0". Per Table 705.8 `unlimited openings' for `Unprotected, Nonsprinklered' require a minimum 30' separation. No openings are allowed at less than 5'-0". If tanslucent plastic panels are to be used they will need to meet the requirements outlined in Chapter 26 Section 903.2.1.2 requires a sprinkler system be installed for A2 spaces over 5000SF OR 100 Occupants Conclusion/Recommendation: Construct reinforced CMU wall with min. 30" parapet, built at property line used to support Heavy timber (per Table 602.4) roof structure. In order to provide maximum translucent coverage, install glass panel roofing conforming with 2405.2. Alternatively full coverage could also be achieved through solid (non -translucent) roofing. Based on previously approved permit documents, the SF and Occupancy of the restaurant, patio, and courtyard is less than 5000Sf and less than 100 Occupants, therefore 903.2.1.2 does not apply 2. Code Issues: Per Table 602 a 10 foot FSD would not require rated exterior wall construction, therefore it is our understanding that table 705.8 would no longer apply. Additionally, per 705.2, assuming an FSD of 10 feet, projections from the structure of a type V construction would be allowable to no more than 40 inches from the lot line. Conclusion/Recommendation: Remove existing structure entirely. Construct new structural timber posts a min. of 10' from the property line, the timber posts would carry a timber trellis that would carry glass roofing panels. Those extensions from the posts can be no closer than 40" from the property line (hold back overhangs 40" from property lines on ea. side). r 0 0 0 ti 0 N J a Q c 0 cu 0 0 a� 0 z 4- 0 0 a� a a Q 0 0 a a� R 0 J r c as E U �a r w a Attachment 3 Packet Pg. 20 2.1.a Conclusion/Recommendation #1 seems like a fairly straight -forward interpretation of the code. Our questions are more focused on our interpretation of the code for #2. It would be great to hear your feedback on both. Thank you for your time, Ryan Rhodes R Y A N R H O D E S DESIGNS 303 NICKERSON STREET I SEATTLE, WA 1 98109 phone 206.632.1818 cell206.718.3477 www.rvanrhodesdesions.com Attachment 3 1Packet Pg. 21 2.1.a Bjorback, Leif From: Bjorback, Leif Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2016 4:57 PM To: 'info The Loft' Subject: RE: The Loft project Niko, I can be available to meet next week, but I think it will be important to have Ryan Rhodes there as well. Ryan's potential designs are what we should be discussing at this point. Thanks, 0 c ti Leif Bjorback 0 N J Building Official a- Q City of Edmonds o (425) 771-0220 x 1380 r o_ Development Services Permit Center Hours: Monday, Tuesday, Thursday & Friday 8:00 AM — 4:30 PM Wednesdays 8:30 to noon a0i 0 z 4- 0 -----Original Message ----- From: info The Loft [mailto:info@theloftlounge.com] a Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2016 2:09 PM Q To: Bjorback, Leif J0 Subject: The Loft project .. r L 0 Q Leif m Is it possible to schedule a meeting with you and my contractor at The Loft so he can have a better understanding of the ca whole project. He is a very nice guy and he has done a few restaurants in Seattle/Green lake/ Ballard area. o We have already talked to one of the structural engineers as well. J r Next week Tuesday or Wednesday will be ideal for all of us. c m E Please let me know Thank you Niko Raptis 206-778-4848 a 5 Attachment 3 Packet Pg. 22 2.1.a Bjorback, Leif From: Bjorback, Leif Sent: Friday, May 20, 2016 5:16 PM To: 'seangiudice@gmail.com' Subject: FW: The Loft - 515 Suite A Hi Sean, thanks for the phone call today. Here is a conversation with Ryan Rhodes that includes some sound code rationale and design concepts. I will also send you the ICC interp concerning "shed construction." Regards, Leif Bjorback Building Official City of Edmonds (425) 771-0220 x 1380 Development Services Permit Center Hours: Monday, Tuesday, Thursday & Friday 8:00 AM — 4:30 PM Wednesdays 8:30 to noon From: Bjorback, Leif Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2016 8:42 AM To: 'Ryan Rhodes' Cc: info The Loft; Michael; Zweber, Kevin (Fire District Address) Subject: RE: The Loft - 515 Suite A Hi Ryan, I apologize for not getting right back to you. Monday was a holiday and this has been a crazy week. Thank you for your message and for clearly breaking down each of your possible scenarios. I did a quick verification of your code rationale and find no major flaws with the conclusions made in either of your approaches. As for your question on the timing of submittals, I realize that there is some time involved in the design process, including coordination with a structural engineer, etc., so I would first ask you what a reasonable amount of time should be allowed in order for you to prepare a complete submittal? Once your application is received, our initial project review would likely take several weeks, at which time you might receive comments from the various reviewing departments, or ideally, approval of the permit. I would highly recommend that you schedule a pre -application meeting with the City, once you have a preliminary design to discuss, where we can get all of the reviewing departments involved in a discussion and identify significant issues that you will want to be aware of before preparing a full submittal. We offer pre -application meetings that are formal where you pay a fee, as well as a less formal version that is free of charge. Please coordinate this meeting with one of our permit coordinators at the permit center. Let me know if you have any further questions. Thanks, Leif Bjorback a Attachment 3 1Packet Pg. 23 2.1.a Building Official City of Edmonds (425) 771-0220 x 1380 Development Services Permit Center Hours: Monday, Tuesday, Thursday & Friday 8:00 AM — 4:30 PM Closed on Wednesdays (Phone lines are open) From: Ryan Rhodes [mailto:ryan ryanrhodesdesigns.com] Sent: Friday, January 15, 2016 5:26 PM To: Bjorback, Leif Cc: info The Loft; Michael r Subject: The Loft - 515 Suite A c ti r Mr. Bjorback, N J a - We have been engaged by the owner of The Loft Restaurant, Niko Raptis, to help navigate and hopefully correct the current "situation" regarding his outdoor courtyard. We fully understand the basis of the violation notice, but we're hoping you can answer a few o questions that might help us reach an expeditious close to the matter. 0 First: Although we've only been involved since yesterday, we're well aware of the City's urgency to correct the violation. Our hope is o that since the matter is now actively being addressed, there's some leniency in turn -around. My questions with regard to timing are: How long do we really have to submit our solution for permits, and how long is the City of Edmonds' turn -around from submittal to 0 permit issuance? We don't have specific experience working with the City of Edmonds, so some help understanding the time frames Z associated with permit reviews would be super helpful for us. o a� Second: We've spent the day doing code research surrounding the specific issues and have made some conclusions. I realize that we a can make those conclusions, and plow ahead with permit submittals, but since this is such an urgent matter (and I know the owner is Q sensitive to cost), we are hoping that we can share those conclusions with you and get a determination if one or both solutions to the J violation are valid and/or which solution would be looked upon more favorably. Here are the code issues with two separate conclusions/recommendations: Code Issues: Per Table 602 the subject VB structure with group A occupancy would require a 1 hr rated wall if constructed closer than 10'-0". Per Table 705.8 `unlimited openings' for `Unprotected, Nonsprinklered' require a minimum 30' separation. No openings are allowed at less than 5%0". If tanslucent plastic panels are to be used they will need to meet the requirements outlined in Chapter 26 Section 903.2.1.2 requires a sprinkler system be installed for A2 spaces over 5000SF OR 100 Occupants Conclusion/Recommendation: Construct reinforced CMU wall with min. 30" parapet, built at property line used to support Heavy timber (per Table 602.4) roof structure. In order to provide maximum translucent coverage, install glass panel roofing conforming with 2405.2. Alternatively full coverage could also be achieved through solid (non -translucent) roofing. Based on previously approved permit documents, the SF and Occupancy of the restaurant, patio, and courtyard is less than 5000Sf and less than 100 Occupants, therefore 903.2.1.2 does not apply 2. Code Issues: Per Table 602 a 10 foot FSD would not require rated exterior wall construction, therefore it is our understanding that table 705.8 would no longer apply. Additionally, per 705.2, assuming an FSD of 10 feet, projections from the structure of a type V construction would be allowable to no more than 40 inches from the lot line. Attachment 3 Packet Pg. 24 2.1.a Conclusion/Recommendation: Remove existing structure entirely. Construct new structural timber posts a min. of 10' from the property line, the timber posts would carry a timber trellis that would carry glass roofing panels. Those extensions from the posts can be no closer than 40" from the property line (hold back overhangs 40" from property lines on ea. side). Conclusion/Recommendation #1 seems like a fairly straight -forward interpretation of the code. Our questions are more focused on our interpretation of the code for #2. It would be great to hear your feedback on both. Thank you for your time, Ryan Rhodes R Y A N R H O D E S DESIGNS 303 NICKERSON STREET I SEATTLE, WA 1 98109 phone 206.632.1818 cell206.718.3477 www.rvanrhodesdesions.com 01J7Z Attachment 3 Packet Pg. 25 2.1.a Bjorback, Leif From: Sent: Bjorback, Leif Friday, May 20, 2016 5:20 PM To: seangiudice@gmail.com Subject: FW: 12 IBC 704.10, Table 602 & 2609 (DC) (The Loft) Sean, here is the interpretation from ICC. Happy reading and have a great weekend! Leif From: Doug Connell [mailto:DConnell@iccsafe.org] o Sent: Monday, August 18, 2014 12:59 PM o To: Lis Valdemarsen Cc: Bjorback, Leif J Subject: RE: 12 IBC 704.10, Table 602 & 2609 (DC) (The Loft) Q August 18, 2014 Subject: 09 IBC Table 602, Section 704.10, 903.2.1.2, 2609.2, 2609.3 and 2609.4 j Background: The owner of an existing A2 restaurant wants to put a roof cover over his outdoor dining area. The building 0 W is type VB non-sprinklered construction and is built right to the property line, adjacent to a CMU building on the next lot. The outdoor dining area also adjoins the property line. • They also want to use as much light transmitting plastic paneling as Z possible in the roof for natural lighting. o Q1: Would IBC 704.10 apply for the framing and roof, sending you to Table 602, requiring construction within 30 feet of Ta a the PL to be 1 hour? Q Al: Actually 704.10 would apply to columns or structural members inside an exterior wall or exterior to the exterior wall. J Table 602 does apply as well as Section 705.8. Proposed open shed construction is governed by Table 602 and Section 705.8. That is you cannot build an open shed up to the property line. You must provide an exterior wall unless Table 602 c does not require a fire rating or Section 705.8 allows unlimited openings in the wall. The code will require a one -hour fire - resistance rated exterior wall at the property line and depending on the roof construction a 30 inch high parapet wall. The roof construction could be non -protected. Q2: I see what seem to be serious restrictions on Type CC1 light transmitting panels in 2609 that require 4 feet between o panels and limit the panels to no more than 30% of the roof area. Am I reading these IBC sections correctly? _J A2: Yes, that is correct. However, if the building is sprinklered then there is no required separation between panels and r c the area of plastic panels is limited to 60% of the floor below. However, Section 2609.3 requires that the plastic panels be t at least 6 ft. from the exterior wall. a Q3: Do you see any other problems or possible code solutions? Let me know if you need more specific information very much appreciate your time and input. A3: Yes, with the roof over the "outdoor" area the fire area is extended and Section 903.2.1.2 will require sprinklers if the new fire area is over 5,000 sq.ft. or if the combined occupancy of the Group A2 occupancy is over 100 persons. Code opinions issued by ICC staff are based on ICC published codes and do not include local, state or federal codes, policies or amendments. This opinion is based on the information which you have provided. We have made no independent effort to verify the accuracy of this information nor have we conducted a review beyond the scope of your question. This opinion does not imply approval of an equivalency, specific product, specific design, or specific installation and cannot be published in any form implying such approval by the International Code Council. As this opinion is only advisory, the final decision is the responsibility of the designated authority charged with the administration and enforcement of this code. Attachment 3 1Packet Pg. 26 2.1.a James D. Connell, P.E. Team Leader, A & E Services International Code Council, Inc. Birmingham District Office 900 Montclair Road Birmingham, AL 35213 888-ICC-SAFE (422-7233), X5226 phone dconnell@iccsafe.org www.iccsafe.or� From: Lis Valdemarsen Sent: Monday, August 11, 2014 5:42 PM To: Doug Connell Cc: Ieif.bjorback(sledmondswa.gov Subject: 12 IBC 704.10, Table 602 & 2609 (DC) Leif, I have forwarded your request to Doug Connell. If you have any questions regarding the status of your reply to your code opinion question, please contact me by either phone or email. Sincerely, Lis Valdemarsen Senior Secretary International Code Council, Inc. Los Angeles District Office 5360 Workman Mill Rd Whittier, CA 90601-2298 Phone: (562) 699-0541 ext 3201 Fax: (562) 699-4522 Ivaldemarsen(c)iccsafe.org www.iccsafe.org Our usual response time is up to a week depending on the issues for email code opinions. Reminders are sent out once a week (7 days) from date engineer is assigned to keep us on track with items on the in box. For written (letter) request: Response time is up to 2 weeks (14 business days). Codes & Standards Forum: The Code Council has revisited how best to provide an online, professional Discussion Forum and area within the website that has a sense of community — where Members and nonmembers can provide input and exchange ideas with their peers in the industry. The new Codes & Standards Discussion Forum does just that, as it allows Registered Website Users and ICC Members to discuss the I -Codes in an online community. Note to Non -Members: If you loin the ICC you can have access to important building safety information! Link: www.iccsafe.org/ICCFORUMS Feed: Codes, Standards & Guidelines: Request Code Opinion Posted on: Monday, August 11, 2014 10:01 AM Author: Leif Bjorback Subject: Leif Bjorback Requestor Full Name: Leif Bjorback Job Title: Building Official Phone Number: 425 771-0220 Requestor email address: leif.biorback@edmondswa.Rov Requestor Address: City of Edmonds 121 5th Ave N Edmonds WA 98020 USA 0 a aD R r O J r C d E t c� r w a 10 Attachment 3 Packet Pg. 27 2.1.a Code Reference: IBC Code Edition: 2012 IBC Code Section: 704.10, Table 602, 2609 Questions: The owner of an existing A2 restaurant wants to put a roof cover over his outdoor dining area. The building is type VB non-sprinklered construction and is built right to the property line, adjacent to a CMU building on the next lot. The outdoor dining area also adjoins the property line. • Would IBC 704.10 apply for the framing and roof, sending you to Table 602, requiring construction within 30 feet of the PL to be 1 hour? • They also want to use as much light transmitting plastic paneling as possible in the roof for natural lighting. I see what seem to be serious restrictions on these panels in 2609 that require 4 feet between panels and limit the panels to no more than 30% of the roof area. Am I reading these IBC sections correctly? Do you see any other problems or possible code solutions? Let me know if you need more specific information. I very much appreciate your time and input. Thank you! Status: New o 0 0 ti 0 N View article... a Q 0 r 0 Join us in Fort Lauderdale for ICUs 2014 Public Comment Hearings in September. Experience cdpACCESS in action and > help ensure the 20151nternational Green Construction Codes achieve the best in energy, water and cost efficiencies o from sustainable construction. Register now. M 0 z 4- 0 11 Attachment 3 Packet Pg. 28 2.1.a Bjorback, Leif From: Sent: To: Subject: I'll see you at 2. Thanks. Bjorback, Leif Tuesday, May 24, 2016 7:33 AM 'Niko Raptis' RE: Loft meeting From: Niko Raptis [mailto:nikos6721@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, May 23, 2016 5:20 PM To: Bjorback, Leif Subject: Re: Loft meeting Can we do at 2pm at the Loft Thank you Niko On Monday, May 23, 2016, Bjorback, Leif <Leif.Biorback(a�edmondswa. ov> wrote: I can make it either at 2:00 or 4:00. Does one of those work? Leif From: Niko Raptis [mailto:nikos67210)gmail.com] Sent: Monday, May 23, 2016 3:48 PM To: Bjorback, Leif Subject: Loft meeting Leif Are you available tomorrow afternoon to meet with us at the Loft Please let me know what time works for you Thank you Niko 12 Attachment 3 Packet Pg. 29 2.1.a Bjorback, Leif From: Ryan Rhodes <ryan@ryanrhodesdesigns.com> Sent: Friday, June 3, 2016 3:31 PM To: Bjorback, Leif Cc: info The Loft (info@theloftlounge.com) Subject: RE: Plastic Roof Panels (Loft) Thanks for looking into this. I think we're heading in another direction anyway, so we're all good. We just got final pricing on another system (which I will email you for your thought), and we're waiting for additional pricing from the contractor. We're hopeful all of this will fall into budget and we'll have a full package for you shortly. 0 0 R Y A N R H O D E S DESIGNS 303 NICKERSON STREET I SEATTLE, WA 1 98109 N phone 206.632.1818 cell206.718.3477 www.rvanrhodesdesions.com J a. Q 91 O r R O_ i From: Bjorback, Leif [mailto:Leif.Bjorback@edmondswa.gov] O Sent: Friday, June 03, 2016 3:16 PM O To: Ryan Rhodes <ryan@ryanrhodesdesigns.com> Z 4- Cc: info The Loft (info@theloftlounge.com) <info@theloftlounge.com>; Bjorback, Leif <Leif.Bjorback@edmondswa.gov> O Subject: Plastic Roof Panels a a Rya n, Q O J I was researching the code some more on the plastic roof panels and found some info in the IBC commentary regarding i the 4 foot separation between plastic panels. See the attached excerpt from the commentary. It appears that the panels a must be spread out, and not grouped together in 300 SF clusters. Short of getting another determination from ICC, this CD W is the way the city will be interpreting that section of the code. I just wanted to pass this along before you prepare your final drawings. in r Thanks, O J r c m E a 13 Attachment 3 Packet Pg. 30 2.1.a Bjorback, Leif From: Bjorback, Leif Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2016 11:48 AM To: Niko Raptis (nikos6721 @gmail.com) Cc: Zweber, Kevin (Fire District Address); Thies, Mike Subject: FW: Plastic Roof Panels (Loft) Nikos, It has been several months since we last discussed your preliminary plans for your construction project. Please submit your building permit application and plans for the project as soon as possible. If the application is not received at the City by October 17, 2016, you will be issued a Notice of Civil Violation that will include monetary fines. Sincerely, Leif Bjorback Building Official City of Edmonds (425) 771-0220 x 1380 Development Services Permit Center Hours: Monday, Tuesday, Thursday & Friday 8:00 AM — 4:30 PM Wednesdays 8:30 to noon From: Ryan Rhodes [mailto:ryan@ryanrhodesdesigns.com] Sent: Friday, June 03, 2016 3:31 PM To: Bjorback, Leif Cc: info The Loft (info@theloftlounge.com) Subject: RE: Plastic Roof Panels (Loft) Thanks for looking into this. I think we're heading in another direction anyway, so we're all good. We just got final pricing on another system (which I will email you for your thought), and we're waiting for additional pricing from the contractor. We're hopeful all of this will fall into budget and we'll have a full package for you shortly. R Y A N R H O D E S DESIGNS 303 NICKERSON STREET I SEATTLE, WA 1 98109 phone 206.632.1818 cell206.718.3477 www.ryanrhodesdesigns.com IQ From: Bjorback, Leif[mailto:Leif.Biorback@edmondswa.gov] Sent: Friday, June 03, 2016 3:16 PM To: Ryan Rhodes <rvan@rvanrhodesdesigns.com> Cc: info The Loft (info@theloftlounge.com) <info@theloftlounge.com>; Bjorback, Leif <Leif.Biorback@edmondswa.gov> Subject: Plastic Roof Panels 14 Attachment 3 Packet Pg. 31 2.1.a Rya n, I was researching the code some more on the plastic roof panels and found some info in the IBC commentary regarding the 4 foot separation between plastic panels. See the attached excerpt from the commentary. It appears that the panels must be spread out, and not grouped together in 300 SF clusters. Short of getting another determination from ICC, this is the way the city will be interpreting that section of the code. I just wanted to pass this along before you prepare your final drawings. Thanks, 15 Attachment 3 Packet Pg. 32 2.1.a Bjorback, Leif From: Ryan Rhodes <ryan@ryanrhodesdesigns.com> Sent: Tuesday, October 4, 2016 4:56 PM To: Chris Potter Cc: Bjorback, Leif Subject: The Loft - Edmonds Hello Chris, Niko's Loft project in Edmonds has resurfaced and I wanted to touch base with you regarding timing. As I believe you are aware, the impetus for this entire project is that the way Niko is currently operating his restaurant does not meet fire separation and occupancy codes. He has received yet another notice from the City of Edmonds, and this notice has clearly lit a fire under him to move forward c with permit level drawings in earnest. This notice indicated that they would like us to submit a permit application by October 17'h since neither you or myself have been actively working on this project in the past months, I called the City on Niko's behalf and spoke N with Leif Bjorback (cc'd) and explained that we are willing to help Niko push this forward, but need more time. Understandably, Niko's a. radio silence does not bode well with the City... so I am cc'ing Leif to this email in an attempt to keep him apprised of what progress is Q taking place. I've also spoken with Niko and he's given the go-ahead to run full -steam ahead on permit drawings. (we had been o waiting to hear from Niko with regards to him finding a contractor, but at this point, we just need to move forward regardless). o 0 As Leif and I discussed, the one unknown for me is when/how long it will take for SSF to back up and running on this project. Based on o other projects we are doing with you guys, I suspect you are a number of weeks out from being able to start. Again, this is M understandable as this project has been off your radar; I'm just trying to put together a reasonable timeline for Leif — and keep him in o the loop. z 4- 0 When you have a moment, please take a look at your schedule, and let me know what you'll need to complete this work. We have plans, elevations, and sections we can send — so we should be good on that end... but will want at least a week after your completion a to coordinate everything into a respectable permit set. a 0 Thanks Ryan R Y A N R H O D E S DESIGNS 303 NICKERSON STREET I SEATTLE, WA 1 98109 phone 206.632.1818 cell206.718.3477 www.rvanrhodesdesions.com Ff 16 Attachment 3 Packet Pg. 33 2.1.a Bjorback, Leif From: Chris Potter <cpotter@ssfengineers.com> Sent: Tuesday, October 4, 2016 5:08 PM To: Ryan Rhodes Cc: Bjorback, Leif Subject: RE: The Loft - Edmonds Hey Ryan, Yeah, our schedule is pretty booked for a while. I think we could potentially get something back to you probably the week of November 7 at the latest. But this would be contingent on getting a signed contract back from Niko by the end of the week. 0 If that sounds good to you then I'll write something up and send it off to you get Niko to sign. c Cheers, 0 Chris N J a- Q Chris Potter, PE, SE Project Manager 0 r 253.284.9470 x 1685 0 Please note my new email address and SSF's new website domain! 0 SWENSON SAY FAGET t0i no 0 934 Broadway, Suite 100, Tacoma, WA 98402 Z ssfengineers.com 0 r_ 0 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient and may contain confidential, proprietary, and/or J privileged information, as well as content subject to copyright and other intellectual property laws. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not disclose, use, copy, or distribute this e-mail message or its attachments. If you believe you have received this e-mail message in error, please contact the sender by reply e-mail, immediately delete this e-mail and destroy any copies. Prior to use of this e-mail message or its attachments, the intended recipient agrees to the terms of use outlined on the Swenson Say 0 Faget copyright link: http://ssfengineers.com/media release/ Any such use indicates acceptance by the recipient of the above statements and conditions of permitted use to without exception. to From: Ryan Rhodes [mailto:ryan@ryanrhodesdesigns.com] r Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2016 4:56 PM J To: Chris Potter <cpotter@ssfengineers.com> r Cc: Bjorback, Leif <Leif.Bjorback@edmondswa.gov> Subject: The Loft - Edmonds Hello Chris, Q Niko's Loft project in Edmonds has resurfaced and I wanted to touch base with you regarding timing. As I believe you are aware, the impetus for this entire project is that the way Niko is currently operating his restaurant does not meet fire separation and occupancy codes. He has received yet another notice from the City of Edmonds, and this notice has clearly lit a fire under him to move forward with permit level drawings in earnest. This notice indicated that they would like us to submit a permit application by October 17th... since neither you or myself have been actively working on this project in the past months, I called the City on Niko's behalf and spoke with Leif Bjorback (cc'd) and explained that we are willing to help Niko push this forward, but need more time. Understandably, Niko's radio silence does not bode well with the City... so I am cc'ing Leif to this email in an attempt to keep him apprised of what progress is taking place. I've also spoken with Niko and he's given the go-ahead to run full -steam ahead on permit drawings. (we had been waiting to hear from Niko with regards to him finding a contractor, but at this point, we just need to move forward regardless). v Attachment 3 Packet Pg. 34 2.1.a As Leif and I discussed, the one unknown for me is when/how long it will take for SSF to back up and running on this project. Based on other projects we are doing with you guys, I suspect you are a number of weeks out from being able to start. Again, this is understandable as this project has been off your radar; I'm just trying to put together a reasonable timeline for Leif — and keep him in the loop. When you have a moment, please take a look at your schedule, and let me know what you'll need to complete this work. We have plans, elevations, and sections we can send — so we should be good on that end... but will want at least a week after your completion to coordinate everything into a respectable permit set. Thanks Ryan R Y A N R H O D E S DESIGNS 303 NICKERSON STREET I SEATTLE, WA 1 98109 phone 206.632.1818 cell206.718.3477 www.ryanrhodesdesigns.com 18 Attachment 3 Packet Pg. 35 2.1.a Bjorback, Leif From: Bjorback, Leif Sent: Wednesday, October 5, 2016 4:55 PM To: 'Ryan Rhodes' Subject: RE: The Loft - Edmonds Ryan, Thank you for the phone call yesterday and also for keeping me in the loop. When the engineer has a timeline established for his work, will you please provide me with a reasonable date that we can expect to see a permit application? Thanks. Leif Bjorback Building Official City of Edmonds (425) 771-0220 x 1380 Development Services Permit Center Hours: Monday, Tuesday, Thursday & Friday 8:00 AM — 4:30 PM Wednesdays 8:30 to noon From: Ryan Rhodes [mailto:ryan@ryanrhodesdesigns.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2016 4:56 PM To: Chris Potter Cc: Bjorback, Leif Subject: The Loft - Edmonds Hello Chris, r L 0 Niko's Loft project in Edmonds has resurfaced and I wanted to touch base with you regarding timing. As I believe you are aware, the impetus for this entire project is that the way Niko is currently operating his restaurant does not meet fire separation and occupancy 4- codes. He has received yet another notice from the City of Edmonds, and this notice has clearly lit a fire under him to move forward with permit level drawings in earnest. This notice indicated that they would like us to submit a permit application by October 17t"... since neither you or myself have been actively working on this project in the past months, I called the City on Niko's behalf and spoke 0 with Leif Bjorback (cc'd) and explained that we are willing to help Niko push this forward, but need more time. Understandably, Niko's radio silence does not bode well with the City... so I am cc'ing Leif to this email in an attempt to keep him apprised of what progress is taking place. I've also spoken with Niko and he's given the go-ahead to run full -steam ahead on permit drawings. (we had been waiting to hear from Niko with regards to him finding a contractor, but at this point, we just need to move forward regardless). c a As Leif and I discussed, the one unknown for me is when/how long it will take for SSF to back up and running on this project. Based on other projects we are doing with you guys, I suspect you are a number of weeks out from being able to start. Again, this is understandable as this project has been off your radar; I'm just trying to put together a reasonable timeline for Leif — and keep him in the loop. When you have a moment, please take a look at your schedule, and let me know what you'll need to complete this work. We have plans, elevations, and sections we can send — so we should be good on that end... but will want at least a week after your completion to coordinate everything into a respectable permit set. Thanks Ryan 19 Attachment 3 Packet Pg. 36 2.1.a RYAN RHODES DESIGNS 303 NICKERSON STREET I SEATTLE, WA 1 98109 phone 206.632.1818 cell206.718.3477 www.ryanrhodesdesigns.com 20 Attachment 3 Packet Pg. 37 2.1.a Bjorback, Leif From: Sent: Bjorback, Leif Wednesday, November 16, 2016 4:46 PM To: 'Niko Raptis'; Ryan Rhodes Cc: Thies, Mike; Zweber, Kevin Subject: RE: FW: Plastic Roof Panels (Loft) Niko, Thank you for coming in today to discuss your project. As agreed, January 6 seems like a very reasonable date by which you should be able to complete your design work and submit an application for building permit. Please be aware that if o the application is not received by this date, further fines may be imposed unless there is a valid reason for further c delays. Please contact me if you or your design team have questions about building code requirements or the permitting process. 0 N J a- Q Regards, 0 Leif Bjorback r o Building Official City of Edmonds CD (425) 771-0220 x 1380 0 z From: Niko Raptis [mailto:nikos6721@gmail.com] o Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2016 1:54 PM To: Bjorback, Leif; Ryan Rhodes a Subject: Re: FW: Plastic Roof Panels (Loft) Q 0 Leif v It was nice to talk to you today. Based on our structural engineer (Swenson Say Faget) and our architect (Ryan Rhodes design) schedules we should be able to submitting plans for the Loft courtyard by January 6th 2017 or earlier. We will inform you if something changes in the meantime. Thank you Niko 206-778-4848 On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 7:54 AM, Niko Raptis <nikos672I kgmail.com> wrote: Ok I'll see you then Thank you Niko On Wednesday, November 16, 2016, Bjorback, Leif <Leif,Bjorbackkedmondswa. _og_v> wrote: Niko, I am available today between 9:30 and noon if you would like to come in then. 21 Attachment 3 Packet Pg. 38 2.1.a Leif From: Niko Raptis [mailto:nikos6721@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2016 6:28 PM To: Bjorback, Leif; Ryan Rhodes Subject: Re: FW: Plastic Roof Panels (Loft) Leif Today we received a notice of civil violation for the back patio.. Our Architect Ryan Rhodes had the opportunity to call you and inform you that we are working toward the permit process last month.. Unfortunately in order to move forward we needed a structural engineer to do the study and drawings witch is hard to find and complete in a such a short time because they are all busy with the new construction frenzy in downtown.. Today I received a proposal from a structural engineer firm (Proposal attached) explains the timeframe for this project. We already sign it and mail it back but as you can see the November 29 deadline is not possible.. Please note that we are trying to do everything possible on our hands to move this project forward. I would like to stop by and talk to you in person as well Please let me know Thank you Niko 206-778-4848 On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 11:48 AM, Bjorback, Leif <Leif. Bj orback(d),edmondswa. gov> wrote: 22 Attachment 3 Packet Pg. 39 2.1.a Nikos, It has been several months since we last discussed your preliminary plans for your construction project. Please submit your building permit application and plans for the project as soon as possible. If the application is not received at the City by October 17, 2016, you will be issued a Notice of Civil Violation that will include monetary fines. Sincerely, Leif Bjorback Building Official City of Edmonds (425) 771-0220 x 1380 Development Services Permit Center Hours: Monday, Tuesday, Thursday & Friday 8:00 AM — 4:30 PM Wednesdays 8:30 to noon From: Ryan Rhodes [mailto:ryan ryanrhodesdesigns.com] Sent: Friday, June 03, 2016 3:31 PM To: Bjorback, Leif Cc: info The Loft (info(g-btheloftlounge.com) Subject: RE: Plastic Roof Panels (Loft) Thanks for looking into this. I think we're heading in another direction anyway, so we're all good. We just got final pricing on another system (which I will email you for your thought), and we're waiting for additional pricing from the contractor. We're hopeful all of this will fall into budget and we'll have a full package for you shortly. 23 Attachment 3 Packet Pg. 40 2.1.a R Y A N R H O D E S DESIGNS 303 NICKERSON STREET I SEATTLE, WA 1 98109 phone 206.632.1818 cell206.718.3477 www.rvanrhodesdesions.com 0 From: Bjorback, Leif[mailto:Leif. Bjorback(c�edmondswa.gov] Sent: Friday, June 03, 2016 3:16 PM To: Ryan Rhodes <ryan(ae,ryanrhodesdesi ng s.com> Cc: info The Loft (info&theloftloun _ eg com) <inf6&theloftloun _ eg com>, Bj orback, Leif <Leif.B: orb back(aedmondswa.gov> Subject: Plastic Roof Panels Ryan, I was researching the code some more on the plastic roof panels and found some info in the IBC commentary regarding the 4 foot separation between plastic panels. See the attached excerpt from the commentary. It appears that the panels must be spread out, and not grouped together in 300 SF clusters. Short of getting another determination from ICC, this is the way the city will be interpreting that section of the code. I just wanted to pass this along before you prepare your final drawings. Thanks, 0 0 0 0 N J a a c 0 0 a� 0 z 4- 0 as a a a 0 1` 0 as M 0 J C as E a 24 Attachment 3 Packet Pg. 41 2.1.a Bjorback, Leif From: Bjorback, Leif Sent: Thursday, January 5, 2017 4:27 PM To: 'Niko Raptis' Cc: Bjorback, Leif Subject: RE: FW: Loft project Niko, New Year's greetings to you as well. Thank you for updating me on the progress of your design. I approve your request to extend the deadline until January 31. Regards, Leif Bjorback Building Official City of Edmonds (425) 771-0220 x 1380 From: Niko Raptis [mailto:nikos6721@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2017 1:24 PM To: Bjorback, Leif Subject: Fwd: FW: Loft project Leif How are you Happy New Year! I'm forwarding you the email from the architects regarding the Loft project. Looks like they need more time in order to finish the drawings. As a result we would like to get an extension until the end of this month. Thank you for your understanding Niko ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Ryan Rhodes <ryan(a�ryanrhodesdesi ng s.com> Date: Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 11:52 AM Subject: FW: Loft project To: Niko Raptis <nikos672lkgmail.com> 25 Attachment 3 Packet Pg. 42 2.1.a From: Chris Potter[mailto:cpotter@ssfengineers.com] Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2017 11:51 AM To: Ryan Rhodes <ryan@ryanrhodesdesigns.com> Subject: RE: Loft project Hey Ryan, I would put it at the end of the month at the latest. Probably more like a couple of weeks in reality though. Thanks, 26 Attachment 3 Packet Pg. 43 2.1.a Chris Chris Potter, PE, SE Project Manager 253.284.9470 x 1685 Please note my new email address and SSF's new website domain! x SWENSON SAY FAGET 27 Attachment 3 Packet Pg. 44 2.1.a STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING 934 Broadway, Suite 100, Tacoma, WA 98402 ssfengineers.com Or 0 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient and may contain confidential, proprietary, and/or privileged information, as well as content subject to copyright and other intellectual property laws. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not disclose, use, copy, or distribute this e-mail message or its attachments. If you believe you have received this e-mail message in error, please contact the sender by reply e-mail, immediately delete this e-mail and destroy any copies. Prior to use of this e-mail message or its attachments, the intended recipient agrees to the terms of use outlined on the Swenson Say Faget copyright link: http://ssfengineers.com/media release/ Any such use indicates acceptance by the recipient of the above statements and conditions of permitted use without exception. a 28 Attachment 3 Packet Pg. 45 From: Ryan Rhodes[mailto:rvan@rvanrhodesdesigns.com] 2.1.a Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2017 11:49 AM To: Chris Potter <cpotter@ssfengineers.com> Subject: FW: Loft project RYANRHODES DESIGNS 303 NICKERSON STREET I SEATTLE, WA 1 98109 phone 206.632.1818 cell 206.718.3477 www. ryanrhodesdesigns. com 29 Attachment 3 Packet Pg. 46 2.1.a From: Niko Raptis [mailto:nikos6721@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2017 10:45 AM To: Ryan Rhodes <ryan@rvanrhodesdesigns.com> Subject: Loft project Ryan 30 Attachment 3 Packet Pg. 47 2.1.a Just checking to see where we at regarding the structural engineering plans for the Loft. As you know city's deadline is January 6th. Please let me know Thank you 31 Attachment 3 Packet Pg. 48 Have a great day 2.1.a Niko Raptis 206-778-4848 a 32 Attachment 3 Packet Pg. 49 2.1.a Bjorback, Leif From: Ryan Rhodes <ryan@ryanrhodesdesigns.com> Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2017 5:42 PM To: Bjorback, Leif Subject: RE: the loft Attachments: 000 PERMIT SET.pdf R Y A N R H O D E S DESIGNS 303 NICKERSON STREET I SEATTLE, WA 1 98109 phone 206.632.1818 cell206.718.3477 www.ryanrhodesdesigns.com From: Bjorback, Leif [mailto:Leif.Bjorback@edmondswa.gov] Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2017 5:31 PM To: Ryan Rhodes <ryan@ryanrhodesdesigns.com> Cc: Niko Raptis (nikos6721@gmail.com) <nikos6721@gmail.com> Subject: RE: the loft Thank you Ryan. I would be interested in taking a look at your plans when you come in tomorrow. You might ask if I am available (along with a permit coordinator) when you come in. Thanks. Leif From: Ryan Rhodes [mailto:ryan@ryanrhodesdesigns.com] c Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2017 11:38 AM m To: Bjorback, Leif; 'Niko Raptis' Cc: Thies, Mike; Zweber, Kevin Subject: RE: the loft in r 0 Leif — We spoke with the building department this morning. We were going to drop off our submittal today — but apparently the building J department is only open until noon today. So we have everything in hand and plan to drop it off tomorrow. E Ryan R Y A N R H O D E S DESIGNS a 303 NICKERSON STREET I SEATTLE, WA 1 98109 phone 206.632.1818 cell206.718.3477 www.ryanrhodesdesigns.com Iq From: Bjorback, Leif [mailto:Leif.Biorback@edmondswa.gov] Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2017 11:27 AM To: Ryan Rhodes <ryan@ryanrhodesdesigns.com>;'Niko Raptis' <nikos6721@gmail.com> 33 Attachment 3 Packet Pg. 50 2.1.a Cc: Thies, Mike <Mike.Thies@edmondswa.gov>; Zweber, Kevin <Kevin.Zweber@edmondswa.gov> Subject: RE: the loft Nikos, I expect your complete permit submittal to be turned in by the end of this week. I anticipate monetary fines will resume next week if we do not receive your application. Sincerely, leif Bjorbac( Building Official City of Edmonds (425) 771-0220 x 1380 Development Services Permit Center Hours: Monday, Tuesday, Thursday & Friday 8:00 AM — 4:30 PM Wednesdays 8:30 to noon From: Bjorback, Leif Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2017 4:38 PM To: 'Ryan Rhodes' Cc: Niko Raptis Subject: RE: the loft Ryan, Thanks for the update, I have not had a moment to reply until now. I look forward to seeing your application soon. leif Bjorbac( Building Official City of Edmonds (425) 771-0220 x 1380 Development Services Permit Center Hours: Monday, Tuesday, Thursday & Friday 8:00 AM — 4:30 PM Wednesdays 8:30 to noon From: Ryan Rhodes[mailto:ryan@ryanrhodesdesigns.com] Sent: Monday, January 30, 2017 4:22 PM To: Bjorback, Leif Cc: Niko Raptis Subject: the loft Leif — Just to give you a quick heads up/update — we received the structural drawings finally for the Loft on Thursday last week (I was hoping we'd get them sooner, but as you know everyone is busy). So we've literally had it in our possession for two working days (if you include today). I am doing my very best to get this into our schedule... I think we should have a permit ready set by the end of the 34 Attachment 3 Packet Pg. 51 2.1.a week, but it may be the following week. At any rate, I wanted to let you know that the project is finally in our control and we're working feverishly to get it done. Thanks Ryan R Y A N R H O D E S DESIGNS 303 NICKERSON STREET I SEATTLE, WA 1 98109 phone 206.632.1818 ceu206.718.3477 www.rvanrhodesdesions.com Ff- 35 Attachment 3 Packet Pg. 52 2.1.a Bjorback, Leif From: Bjorback, Leif Sent: Wednesday, March 1, 2017 4:53 PM To: 'Ryan Rhodes' Cc: Niko Raptis (nikos6721 @gmail.com); Thornquist, Linda Subject: RE: Loft Plans Ryan, All I am suggesting is that when we are all done with this project, the city will be verifying that the courtyard configuration matches what has been approved by the city, whether it remains in the previous arrangement with an OIL of 19 or (if Niko chooses) a newly proposed arrangement that may or may not have other ramifications. That part is totally up to him. For the record, I think the slab is a good idea, and shouldn't trigger anything significant. Thanks for providing some clarification on the scope of the project. Leif From: Ryan Rhodes[mailto:ryan@ryanrhodesdesigns.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2017 4:18 PM To: Bjorback, Leif Cc: Niko Raptis (nikos6721@gmail.com); Thornquist, Linda Subject: RE: Loft Plans It should be clear on the drawings that we are not proposing a change in occupancy? Therefore he is requesting no change to the posted occupancy for the building. We can show seating for 19 occupants if you'd like, I just through it was clearer to emphasize no change in occupancy was proposed. That being said — if Niko does want to increase occupancy — will the City of Edmonds require additional bathrooms be a constructed? You can see where I'm going with this I'm sure.... because there's literally no room for this and hence the need to NOT c change the occupancy. r L Obviously Niko is feeling like you're running him out of town because first you've asked for the upgrade to the roof and separation a (which clearly some level of occupancy was permitted back there at one point per the drawing you sent — by the City of Edmonds)... and now that he is complying there is the curveball of increased occupancy. It is my understanding that he does not wish to increase a the occupancy back there — explicitly because there's no way to increase restrooms in this building. If City of Edmonds can clearly communicate what you're really asking here (i.e. if you're asking him to post a higher occupancy load — and therefore add bathrooms - o then that needs to be clear... but if you're asking for him to keep the occupancy to 19, and simply upgrade the roof and separation, that's an entirely different issue). The reason for upgrading the entire slab back there is because currently the brick courtyard is not up to ADA code — and after much conversation we decided it was best to upgrade to a consistent smooth surface that meets ADA code... E if replacing the slab is what is triggering this, then maybe it's best we just leave the bricks. In summary — we were trying to make it clear on the drawings that there was to be no increase in occupancy — and it feels like the Q question from you below is somewhat of a loaded request. Some clarity on this would be much appreciated We can propose a lighting plan — and submit lighting forms. No problem. R Y A N R H O D E S DESIGNS 303 NICKERSON STREET I SEATTLE, WA 1 98109 phone 206.632.1818 ce11206.718.3477 www.ryanrhodesdesigns.com 36 Attachment 3 Packet Pg. 53 2.1.a In From: Bjorback, Leif[mailto:Leif. Blorback@edmondswa.gov] Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2017 2:33 PM To: Ryan Rhodes <ryan@ryanrhodesdesigns.com> Cc: Niko Raptis (nikos6721@gmail.com) <nikos6721@gmail.com>; Thornquist, Linda <Linda.Thornguist@edmondswa.gov> Subject: Loft Plans Hi Ryan, It will be a while yet before I get to my review of the Loft project, but I wanted to give you a heads up that we will need additional information from you before we can do a complete review of the project. Specifically, it looks as if there will be a reworking of the courtyard seating layout, which will receive a whole new slab on grade. Also, my recollection of the layout of the courtyard from my recent site visits does not match that of the most recent city -approved configuration (from BLD2008-0462), a copy of which is attached. Will you please provide us with a floor plan of the courtyard area along with new occupant load calculations? Also, will there be any lighting in the space? If so, you will need to provide us with a lighting plan and energy code forms. I will be out of the office for the next week and a half, so please work with Linda Thornquist if you have any questions. Thanks! Leif Bjorback Building Official City of Edmonds (425) 771-0220 x 1380 Development Services Permit Center Hours: Monday, Tuesday, Thursday & Friday 8:00 AM — 4:30 PM Wednesdays 8:30 to noon From: SysAdmin Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2017 2:18 PM To: Bjorback, Leif Subject: Attached Image 37 Attachment 3 Packet Pg. 54 2.1.a Bjorback, Leif From: Ryan Rhodes <ryan@ryanrhodesdesigns.com> Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 12:34 PM To: Bjorback, Leif Subject: Re: Loft review Thanks. Im out of town till the 20th but will begin implementing corrections upon my return RRD www.rvanrhodesdesigns.com (206) 632-1818 On Apr 12, 2017, at 8:54 AM, Bjorback, Leif <Leif.Blorback@edmondswa.gov> wrote: Hi Ryan, I have completed my review of your project and identified some issues that will need to be addressed before I can approve the permit. Please see my comments attached, and feel free to contact me if you have any questions. Regards, leif Bjorback Building Official City of Edmonds (425) 771-0220 x 1380 Development Services Permit Center Hours: Monday, Tuesday, Thursday & Friday 8:00 AM — 4:30 PM Wednesdays 8:30 to noon <2017-0274 The Loft.pdf> <SI Struc Loft.pdf> 38 Attachment 3 Packet Pg. 55 2.1.a Bjorback, Leif From: Ryan Rhodes <ryan@ryanrhodesdesigns.com> Sent: Monday, May 22, 2017 3:45 PM To: Bjorback, Leif Subject: RE: Loft review Follow Up Flag: Flag Status: Leif Follow up Flagged I wanted to touch base with you on this project. Just so you know, after receiving these corrections, we contacted Niko about moving c forward on two different occasions, and he has not responded to me. He has paid neither myself nor the structural engineer for the work we did associated with the initial permit submittal. Without payment, there's just no way I'm moving forward with these corrections N on his behalf, and I know the structural engineer feels the same way. The reason I'm reaching out to you is because I do not want you a to think it is us that are dragging our feet. I do not like that he has put us in this spot with the City of Edmonds, and I like even less that Q we have not been paid for the work. It seems like the only times he has been responsive is when he feels the pressure from you guys o — and even then it's only in little bursts. Anyway, I simply wanted to let you know that at this point we are completely hands off until we T get paid — and I do not want this to reflect negatively on our firm. o O Thanks Ryan Rhodes o z R Y A N R H 0 D E S DESIGNS o 303 NICKERSON STREET I SEATTLE, WA 1 98109 phone 206.632.1818 cell206.718.3477 www.ryanrhodesdesigns.com Q Q O r From: Bjorback, Leif [mailto:Leif.Bjorback@edmondswa.gov] Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 11:54 AM To: Ryan Rhodes <ryan@ryanrhodesdesigns.com> Subject: Loft review Hi Ryan, I have completed my review of your project and identified some issues that will need to be addressed before I can approve the permit. Please see my comments attached, and feel free to contact me if you have any questions. Regards, Leif Bjorback Building Official City of Edmonds (425) 771-0220 x 1380 Development Services Permit Center Hours: Monday, Tuesday, Thursday & Friday 8:00 AM — 4:30 PM Wednesdays 8:30 to noon 39 Attachment 3 Packet Pg. 56 2.1.a a 40 Attachment 3 Packet Pg. 57 2.1.a Bjorback, Leif From: Thornquist, Linda Sent: Monday, May 22, 2017 4:59 PM To: info@theloftlounge.com' Cc: Bjorback, Leif, 'ryan@ryanrhodesdesign.com'; Zweber, Kevin Subject: BLD20170274 / Patio Cover Nikolaos, This email is in regards to the application for the Patio Cover at 515 Main St #A. Due to the fact that this is a violation, responses to comments are required to be submitted as soon as possible. This application expires 8/22/2017. We require ample time to review your re -submittal, obtain approvals and issue this permit before the expiration date of 8/22/2017. This application cannot be extended. Please respond as to when we can expect your resubmittal. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. Linda Thornquist Senior Permit Coordinator City of Edmonds 425-771-022o ext.1336 Our hours are from Sam to 4:3opm Monday, Tuesday, Thursday and Friday. OUR PERMIT COUNTER WEDNESDAYHOURS: OPEN 8:30 — NOON CLOSED NOON-4:30Pm We now charge a 3%fee on all Credit Card Transactions 41 Attachment 3 Packet Pg. 58 2.1.a Bjorback, Leif From: Sent: To: Thornquist, Linda Friday, August 11, 2017 10:58 AM 'Christine Greene' Cc: Bjorback, Leif Subject: RE: The Loft BLD20170274 Thank you for responding Christine ... have a great weekend. Thank you, Linda Thornquist o Senior Permit Coordinator City of Edmonds 425-771-022o ext.1336 N J a. Our hours are from Sam to 4:301m Monday, Tuesday, Thursday and Friday. Q OUR PERMIT COUNTER WEDNESDAYHOURS: OPEN 8:30 — NOON o CLOSED NOON-4:301m We now charge a 3%fee on all Credit Card Transactions 0 a� From: Christine Greene [mailto:christine@ryanrhodesdesigns.com] o Sent: Friday, August 11, 2017 10:11 AM z To: Thornquist, Linda 0 Subject: RE: The Loft BLD20170274 a a Hi Linda, Q 0 J We haven't heard from Niko in a while as he never paid his last bill. Until then, I don't think I'm supposed to do anything i with this. 0 a m Thanks for letting me know, -Christine v� r 0 J From: Thornquist, Linda [mailto:Linda.Thornquist@edmondswa.gov] Sent: Friday, August 11, 2017 10:05 AM m To: Christine Greene<christine@ryanrhodesdesigns.com> Subject: The Loft BLD20170274 .r a This application will expire on August 22nd 2017. There are comments that need to be responded to from Building and Engineering. Due to the fact that this is a current violation these comments must be responded to ASAP. Thank you, Linda Thornquist Senior Permit Coordinator City of Edmonds 425-771-022o ext. 1336 Our hours are from Sam to 4:3opm Monday, Tuesday, Thursday and Friday. OUR PERMIT COUNTER WEDNESDAYHOURS: OPEN 8:30 — NOON 42 Attachment 3 Packet Pg. 59 2.1.a CLOSED NOON-4:30pm We now charge a 3%fee on all Credit Card Transactions a 43 Attachment 3 Packet Pg. 60 2.1.a Bjorback, Leif From: Bjorback, Leif Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2017 2:31 PM To: 'Ryan Rhodes'; Niko Raptis Cc: Thies, Mike; Hope, Shane Subject: RE: violation notice - the loft Niko and Ryan, Both of you were recently notified that the permit application would expire on August 22, yet there has been no resubmittal received by my office that would indicate an intent to pursue the building permit before the application expired. Thus, we are left with a code violation of the roof that was constructed without a permit, and from my perspective, there has not been a satisfactory effort to address my previous directives to bring the structure into compliance. Niko, as owner of the property, this is your responsibility to correct the violation. Please re -read item #1 under Corrective Action Required. In short, Niko, you have 30 days in which to remove the existing patio roof structure and restore the outdoor dining area to what was approved under the latest building permit. This will need to be done under a building permit for demolition. I understand that you would like to move forward with rebuilding a compliant structure, and you are more than welcome to do that. However, in light of the ongoing violation, and the lack of response on your part, the City cannot wait any longer for you to remove the illegal structure. To be perfectly clear, your next step is to apply for a demolition permit. If you do not agree with the content or direction given within the notice of violation, you may appeal the decision to the Hearing Examiner within 7 days as stated on the order. Regards, Leif 3fo- tvwk Building Official City of Edmonds (425) 771-0220 Development Services Hours: Monday & Tuesday 8:00 AM — 4:30 PM WEDNESDAYS WALK-IN (counter) hours are 8:30-Noon Thursday & Friday 8:00 AM — 4:30 PM From: Ryan Rhodes[mailto:ryan@ryanrhodesdesigns.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2017 1:22 PM To: Bjorback, Leif <Leif.Bjorback@edmondswa.gov> Cc: Niko Raptis <nikos6721@gmail.com> Subject: violation notice - the loft Hello Leif — Niko asked me if I would get some clarification on the attached violation notice on his behalf. 0 0 0 ti 0 N J a. Q r_ 0 0 0 W 0 z 4- 0 0 as a a Q 0 J 44 Attachment 3 Packet Pg. 61 2.1.a I totally understand that there has been a long delay in resubmittal based on your correction notices. We have been waiting for Niko's approval to proceed. It sounds like he would like to move forward on submittal of permit corrections. So I am wondering if you could clarify the deadlines here. It's not clear if this says the structure has to be torn down and rebuilt prior to 10/29 (obviously impossible — especially since we don't even have a permit yet) OR — if this is saying that the permit application has to be finalized by that date? Hoping you can shed some light on this for Niko. With his approval (and an understanding of a realistic timeline — or grace period) I would re-engage the structural engineer to address the structural aspect of the corrections and I would address the architectural aspect of the correction... but that would take some time. I guess we need to start with clarification of what this violation is really saying though — and we'll go from there. Thanks Ryan Rhodes R Y A N R H O D E S DESIGNS 303 NICKERSON STREET I SEATTLE, WA 1 98109 phone 206.632.1818 ce11206.718.3477 www.rvanrhodesdesions.com 0 45 Attachment 3 Packet Pg. 62 2.1.a Bjorback, Leif From: Hope, Shane Sent: Friday, September 1, 2017 2:23 PM To: nikos6721 @gmail.com'; 'info@theloftlounge.com' Cc: Bjorback, Leif, Zweber, Kevin (Fire District Address); Earling, Dave Subject: Loft Violation Niko, I appreciated our conversation yesterday. As you know, we think your business is an important asset I the city's downtown. At the same time, we remain concerned about the fire hazard related to the unpermitted roof structure over the patio. You indicated that removing the unpermitted roof within 30 days would be a hardship to your business and that you could submit your plans for a new structure (with the final minor corrections requested by the City) in o about a week and also prepare a clear and firm schedule for getting permits and removing the roof by early January and c taking any other necessary steps in the interim. I've spoken with our building official and fire marshal about this possibility. They think removing the roof structure within 30 days is the best policy. However, they might be willing to 0 J consider allowing the unpermitted roof to remain until January if you can show that you are not only submitting your a- new roofing plans and getting permits by dates certain, but are taking other steps that would include some interim o added safety precautions to reduce the risk of fire. For questions about what such steps might be, please talk to our building official or fire marshal asap. o Please understand: the suggestion above does not mean that your request will be automatically upheld. Rather, it W means it will be considered and, depending on all the facts and the clear and firm commitment (and follow-through) proposed by a schedule you submit —no later than Sept. 11—the building official and fire marshal (copied here) may Z allow additional time for you to get into full compliance. Since the deadline for appealing the original posted notice o about roof removal comes BEFORE September 11, which is when you plan to submit a proposed schedule, and we don't yet know whether your schedule (including interim extra fire protection methods) will be acceptable, we understand a you may want to appeal the current notice. That is something for you to weigh and decide. Meanwhile, you are Q welcome to call the building official or fire marshal to discuss options for additional fire safety protection in the interim. J Again, our goal is to both encourage local businesses AND have a safe environment. r o Regards, Shane Hope Shane Hope, AICP Development Services Director City of Edmonds 425.771.0220 x-1216 shone.hope@edmondswa.gov 46 Attachment 3 Packet Pg. 63 2.1.a Bjorback, Leif From: Hope, Shane Sent: Monday, September 11, 2017 5:12 PM To: Bjorback, Leif, Zweber, Kevin (Fire District Address) Subject: FW: Loft courtyard project Attachments: The Loft courtyard remodeling PDF.pdf Follow Up Flag: Flag Status: Follow up Flagged Leif and Kevin, 0 Here is Niko's proposed timeline for the Loft patio roof compliance, as we discussed with the mayor. Niko appears to be c rl- addressing the demolition, permitting, and reconstruction timeline, but is not offering anything about increased fire watch or other safety measures in the interim. Meanwhile, he has filed a formal appeal to the hearing examiner. The J appeal is likely to provide him additional time to comply because we generally cannot enforce during the appeal a- Q period. The appeal will go to the hearing examiner and a decision issued in probably 4-6 weeks. If you have suggestions c for his schedule, please let him know. Or we can talk more if needed. 0 Thanks, Shane 0 CD From: Niko Raptis [mailto:nikos6721@gmail.com] ..2 Sent: Monday, September 11, 2017 5:00 PM 0 To: Hope, Shane o Subject: Loft courtyard project as a Hi Shane Q 0 Attached is the Loft courtyard project timeline as I promised to our meeting. I would like to extend the demolition until January so we don't loose the valuable time of the Holiday season. This way we will be able to create more revenue not only for the city but also by employing extra stuff. It would be unfair for many employees and their families to loose their job during the best time of the year.. Without the courtyard revenue The Loft will not be able to operate.. We already filed for an appeal hoping the city council will be able to accept our request. Best regards Niko Raptis GM THE LOFT 206-778-4848 47 Attachment 3 Packet Pg. 64 2.1.a Bjorback, Leif From: Hope, Shane Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2017 7:48 AM To: Zweber, Kevin (Fire District Address); Bjorback, Leif Subject: FW: Loft courtyard project FYI, my response to Niko. From: Hope, Shane Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2017 7:48 AM To: 'Niko Raptis' Subject: RE: Loft courtyard project Hi Niko, Thanks for sending the project timeline. I have sent it to the building official and fire marshal to get their response. Meanwhile, since you have an appeal pending, enforcement of the previous order is temporarily suspended. I do appreciate the financial concerns you have. At the same time, the City has fire risk concerns. We will look at the timeline further and get back to you, probably next week. Regards, Shane From: Niko Raptis [mailto:nikos67210)gmail.com] Sent: Monday, September 11, 2017 5:00 PM To: Hope, Shane Subject: Loft courtyard project Hi Shane Attached is the Loft courtyard project timeline as I promised to our meeting. I would like to extend the demolition until January so we don't loose the valuable time of the Holiday season. This way we will be able to create more revenue not only for the city but also by employing extra stuff. It would be unfair for many employees and their families to loose their job during the best time of the year.. Without the courtyard revenue The Loft will not be able to operate.. We already filed for an appeal hoping the city council will be able to accept our request. Best regards Niko Raptis GM THE LOFT 206-778-4848 48 Attachment 3 Packet Pg. 65 2.1.a ?rs ??r �ro ?rs / r3p 0 ors N W 145 Q 155 C 203 M 209 221 223 229 233 317 DAYTO N ST 0 0 400 ; M cM 209 216 215 220 221 232 N a "'' 229 239 242 247 249 250 DALEY ST 3p4�'\pry �p ? 0 o N co co N 30 r �o°'o FOB 304 V � � O'40S SPRAGUE ST W Q H 50800 510 512 , c0 M N 514 Ln 610 0 0 M2 1 610 w to m 63 Boy's & Girls 310 Club Grandstan co �— :iA N o — — o o 00 N 410 N MCD o co co N co o co co a N ti 633 0 0 � MAIN ST �c 0 0 626 M � co Z 117 111 m i 40 DAYTO N ST TVC.00,44 201 OLD 0 M � Ln MILLTOWN o cn o 210 Q 203 523 N o N CHRIS SCIENCE 551 o CHURCH MAPLE ST N 228 524 W Q 303 N o Qo c 306 RICHMAR CONDO o M 2 I— 313 i 318 r N co 314 THE MARINER 601 0 0 co co The Loft - 515 Main Street Appeal of Notice of Violation APL230170001 'nc. 18y Attachment 4 � co o � N N � co co co co co co co 219r,,�.,0 r o � co N co rn�� N co M co M co 215 303 0 o � N M � co 30 Scale 1 inch = 250 feet Packet Pg. 66 0 0 0 0 N J d a C O 0 N O Z O as a a a 0 `o a as �a 0 J c m a 2.1.a DEVELOPMENT SERVICES COMMERCIAL & MULTI -FAMILY BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION 121 51h Avenue N, Edmonds, WA 98020 City of Edmonds Phone 425.771.0220 ft Fax 425.771.0221 PLEASE REFER TO THE COMMERCIAL & MULTI -FAMILY BUILDING CHECKLIST FOR SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS PROJECT ADDRESS (Street, Suite #, City State, Zip): 57S A4gNSF STE ,# 601y10u0S w- 9861a Parcel #: U®�fi'�Ze2/a3�vD Subdivision/Lot #: G ®f Cp1A4A10S: tQUC-%C' 021 D—f10 —Tie o 6'" 9 Project Valuation: $ Sd K APPLICANT: Phone: Fax: Address (Street, City, State, Zip): E-Mail Address: PROPERTY OWNER: i-,4x y`R.&�s p�eoyE-,<-7 �l �LG Phone: Fax: Address (Street, City, State, Zip): 23' NINOL Lit: 9 02-0. E-Mail Address: T FAIRING I CAW{� f )VC— C�I�W i 'Jul �eASoly51. , !.E b L-I818 Phone: F CCvn e� r(�trtjIu nS.c�m , Address (Street, City, State, Zip): E-Mail Address: CONTRACTOR:* �, � T ZiZip): Phone: Fax: Address (Street, City, State, E-Mail Address *Contractor must have a valid City of Edmonds business license prior to doing work in the City. Contact the City Clerk's Office at 425.775.2525 WA State License #/Exp. Date: City Business License #/Exp. Date: DETAIL THE SCOPE OF WORK: OOM LAX I S PA16, &01V li0MFjaf ArT &-n p COWS 1-KUCam' N C-11✓ A012Fa L� 9191_1 ON cvALLA, �� SAGE &�WI.S Z—1 /VGr AlotJn22r+ LIAu r s"n PROPOSED NEWSQUARE FOOTAGE FOR THIS PROJECT: 1 st Floor: s . ft. 2°d Floor: s . ft. 31 Floor: s . ft. Basement: s . ft, Gara e: s . ft. Deck/Cvrd Porch: --sq. ft. Other: s . ft, Retainin Wall: Yes No Fire S rinklers: Yes No Occupancy Grou (s): Occupant Load(s): I Type(s) of Construction: Grading: Cut cu. ds. Fill cu.yds. I Cut/Fill in Critical Area: Yes Ej No Lj I declare under penalty of perjury laws that the information I have provided on this form/application is true, correct and complete, and that I am the property owner or duly authorized agent of the property owner to submit a permit application to the City of Edmonds. Print Name: 4:�4tqpp (S-r/A)6:, 4i14ct) Owner ❑g2jijin rr�� qL0 pecify}; Signature: Date: j%2 1 d DR0 FORM E L:1 +I Wg New Folder 201MONE & x-%rred to L-BuAdit tch &&lr5 2014.docx Up ^ a� G" Packet Pg. 67 2.1.a 4, � itTrax by Bitco Software - Internet Explorer BUILDING PERMIT v PROP OWNER: THE LOFT - TAX TABLE PROPERTIES LOCATION: 515 MAIN ST #A, EDMONDS 4 ` J WORK DESC: DEMO EXISTING NON -COMPLIANT PATIO COVER AND _. SCREENS-- I Select Screen.-. �J SCREEN: GENERAL INFORMATION Permit Type: lCommercial Permit Group: 122 _ Deck/Porch/Patio Cover v ❑ New ❑Addition ❑ Repair ❑ Remodel ❑ Mixed Use ❑ Multi Family W Plan Check? ❑ Plumbing/Mechanical Work Description: DEMO EXISTING NON -COMPLIANT PATIO COVER AND CONSTRUCT NEW_ Outstanding Items at Time of Submittal FUNCTIONS:1 Select Permit Function___ PERMIT #: BLD2017021 STATUS: EXPIRE J CREATED:2J23120 J BALANCE: $1,309_, c 0 N J d 0 c _ o o r i STATUS: EXPIRED v 0 - - i aD U Intake By: ILinda Thornquist j 0 -- 4- 0 Applied: 02J2312017 `� m a a Issued: a City Business License #: 0 Expires: 08122/2017 Final: °a CBL Exp_ Date: Void. PC: LINDA Source: 1 Permit Revisions: Renewal: Review 0 03I23(2017 J c E r r El Attachment 6 Packet Pg. 68 2.1.a City of Edmonds PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS BUILDING DIVISION (425) 771-0220 DATE: April 11, 2017 TO: Ryan Rhodes Email: Tyan@ryanrhodesdesi.gn.com FROM: Leif Bjorback, Building Official RE: Plan Check: BLD2017-0274 Project: Loft Patio Cover Project Address: 515 Main St During review of the plans for the above noted project, it was found that the following information, clarifications or changes are needed. Please provide written responses as to where the changes can be found on the plans, and submit revised plans/documents to a permit coordinator in the Development Services Department. 1. Please clarify whether the plans were prepared by a licensed architect or not. If so, the plans must be stamped and sealed as required by state law. 2. Please have the engineer of record either stamp and seal the structural pages; or at least stamp and sign the `S' pages as "reviewed." 3. Reference sheet S 1.0. The roof framing plan shows the exterior walls noted as `SW 1', however no shearwall table has been provided. Please provide the shearwall table on the plans, similar to what is included in the engineering calculations. 4. Reference the ALR pages. Designs for premanufactured roof systems such as the louvered aluminum roof system shall be stamped and signed by a Washington state licensed engineer. Further, the ALR pages are marked `Do Not Photocopy' and are labeled as a copyrighted document and cannot be accepted by the city as a submittal document. If the ALR system is to be a deferred submittal item, please indicate this on the plans. 5. Indicate on the plans the size and spacing of the purlins for the aluminum roof system. This information should be clearly indicated by the design engineer. 6. Provide calculations to show that the glass roof panels meet the structural design requirements of IBC 2404 and 2405. If this is to be a deferred submittal item, please indicate this on the plans. 7. Please provide a lighting plan for the space, and provide the Washington State Energy Code form for lighting. 8. Special inspections have been identified as required for the project in compliance with IBC chapter 17. Please complete and return the attached special inspection agreement form to my office; this may be done at any time prior to issuance of the permit. Thank you. Page 1 of 1 Attachment 7 Packet Pg. 69 2.1.a OAS r-i ET�1� N Ems/ Ch do N 6- va diA5 aL1N� '04. "T HE: L© FT,, God-YTZfa SCkLC- 10 ,f gel �-AyoqT JUN 10 26M �UtLpRNC� IDE�P,.,ART`MEW M IFw+M.%IrJ O O O ti O N J a a 0 R O_ 0 m 0 Z 0 0 0 a - CD J C d E L V a+ a Attachment 8 Packet 2.1.a (:W5 N E",/ r4 &-rw2- ChAf5 r �1ACO ACT L7 61 Ay �14 T :i J EJ �jo OC,--OgANCy "THE LO FTI, Gobi -/Av-o SCkLC- 115, TIC LOFT l-Ayo -r DIAL DW, pEPAHT MEN! ;.: CF O O O ti 0 N J rL a c 0 0 0 m 0 Z 0 as a Q. a 0 0 a - CD N 0 J C d E L V a Attachment 8 Packet Pg. 71 2.1.a CITY OF EDMONDS NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Appeal of Building Official issuance of Notice of Violation for work performed without permit. The site is located within the Downtown Business (BD1) zone. NAME OF APPLICANT: Niko Raptis, The Loft Cafe PROJECT LOCATION: 515 Main Street, Edmonds, WA FILE NO.: APL201700001 COMMENTS ON PROPOSAL DUE: October 12, 2017 Any person has the right to comment on this application during the public comment period, receive notice and participate in any hearings, and request a copy of the decision on the application. The City may accept public comments at any time prior to the closing of the record of an open record pre -decision hearing, if any, or, if no open record pre -decision hearing is provided, prior to the decision on the project permit. PUBLIC HEARING: Public hearing will be held on October 12, 2017 at 3 pm Council Chambers 250-5th Ave North Edmonds, WA 98026 CITY CONTACT: Leif Bjorback, Building Official (425) 771-0220, leif.biorback@edmondswa.,gav PUBLISH: September 27, 2017 Attachment 9 Packet Pg. 72 2.1.a 224 2 2rs 22r IDrp _ors `A Lu Q OC 203 209 221 223 229 233 317 2 ST 3pr 3� 22s 22� 2�3 DAYTO N ST ® o 00 " cNrs " I 209 216 215 220 221 232 225 `^ 229 > 239 242 247 250L. 249 DALEY ST ro n N ca i 9 3p 304 ,Nd SPRAGUE ST Q Y F- c� s08 JUN514 LO N63 ft610N 04 610 eo co W Boy's & Girls 310 Club 300 Grandstan O P N {V N ry � N ca ca e® 't 03 N O N e- N O [p O ES N O 1�0 JEEZENCN633 Ca MAIN ST " Es l, 117 111 O N O � DAYTO N ST 0 201 p 00 N Ni OU) u7 N us y HR 210 Q� N u7 scIENCE 551 CHURCH Lo H MAPLE ST ,,, 228 o 303FRICHMAR 306 LO � M313 3 318 `° N314 R 601 cMo The Loft - 515 Main Street Appeal of Notice of Violation APL230170001 .,,C, 18gV Attachment 9 00C® fQ ;:�t tCQNn to � � � 21 g r � us ��� 215� 30 � � Scale 1 inch = 250 feet Packet Pg. 73 0 0 0 ti O N J d a 0 r O 0 a� 0 Z O N a 0 0 a as 0 r c as a 2.1.a FILE NO.: APL20170001 APPLICANT: THE LOFT DECLARATION OF MAILING NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING On the 27 day of September, 2017, the attached Notice of Public Hearing was mailed by the City to property owners within 300 feet of the property that is the subject of the above -referenced application. I, Denise Nelson, hereby declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that the foregoing is true and correct this 27 day of September 2017 at Edmonds, Washington. S Signed: Attachment 9 Packet Pg. 74 2.1.a FILE NO.: APL20170001 APPLICANT: THE LOFT DECLARATION OF POSTING NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING On the 27 day of September, 2017, the attached Notice of Public Hearing was posted by the City to property owners within 300 feet of the property that is the subject of the above - referenced application. I, Michael Clugston, hereby declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that the foregoing is true and correct this 27 day of September, 2017 at Edmonds, Washington. Signed: AP�44�-� {BFP747887.DOC;]\00006.900000\ ) Attachment 9 Packet Pg. 75 2.1.a Everett Daily Herald Affidavit of Publication State of Washington } County of Snohomish } ss Dicy Sheppard being first duly swom, upon oath deposes and says: that he/she is the legal representative of the Everett Daily Herald a daily newspaper. The said newspaper is a legal newspaper by order of the superior court in the county in which it is published and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of the first publication of the Notice hereinafter referred to, published in the English language continually as a daily newspaper in Snohomish County, Washington and is and always has been printed in whole or part in the Everett Daily Herald and is of general circulation in said County, and is a legal newspaper, in accordance with the Chapter 99 of the Laws of 1921, as amended by Chapter 213, Laws of 1941, and approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of Snohomish County, State of Washington, by order dated June 16, 1941, and that the annexed is a true copy of EDH778684 APL201700001 as it was published in the regular and entire issue of said paper and not as a supplement form thereof for a period of 1 issue(s), such publication commencing on 09/27/2017 and ending on 09/27/2017 and that said newspaper was regularly distributed to its subscribers during all of said period. The amount of the fee for such publication is $43.00. LC�V Subscribed and sworn ore me nn this day of 1 Notary Public in and for the State of Washington. City or Edmonds - LEGAL ADS 114101416 DIANE CUNNINGHAM =EXpires gton 08I29/2021 Attachment 9 Packet Pg. 76 2.1.a 0 0 0 C4 0 N Cr1OFOPFEBLIGONOS NOTIREARING CE PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Appeal of Bullding 011iciaf lasOonca Of J d Notice of Vialarlon for work vpaprfcrmod wilhoul permll.The sale Is Ioaeled whhln Ih8 D9wfl1 wn BuCIi09" [BD1]] zone. Q NAME OF APPLICANT; NWw Raptls, The Loll [:1% PROJECT LOCATION:616 Main StreOl. Edmonds, WA O _ FILE NO,:APL201700001 COMMENTS ON PROPOSAL DLIE:October 12, 2017 leas She right to comment an this application during +' t4 0 Any person the public comment perlod, receive rnotice and pliaMpale In any hearing, and request a copy of the deals Ion on Iho appticaliOn. cemments at on tints prior to the ; The City may accept public closing lift o ep0ttoredof cerd prrk edecirk sion hearing I$provden 1116 dl Prior O to th0 decision on the WOW pelmll. O PUBLIC I•IEARING, Public hearing will be held on October 12 2017 at 3 pm V ++ O Council Chambers 250 - 5th Ave With Z Edmonds. WA 98020 Cf1Y CONTACT: Last Blorhack Building Official 4— O 425) 771.0220,p�,� EDH778684l Pill[( rlishtl r2—"7.2Qi7. G. C Q O J Attachment 9 Packet Pg. 77 2.2 Hearing Examiner Agenda Item Meeting Date: 10/12/2017 Jenkins Lane Five Lot Subdivision (PLN20170028) Staff Lead: Jen Machuga Department: Planning Division Prepared By: Jen Machuga Background/History The applicant is proposing to subdivide a 33,177 square foot property located at 720 13th Way SW into five lots. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that the Hearing Examiner approve the proposed plat with conditions. Refer to the staff report (Exhibit 1) for recommended conditions of approval. Narrative The subject proposal is to subdivide a 33,177 square foot property addressed 720 13th Way SW into five lots. The site is located within the Single -Family Residential, RS-6, zone, which allows lots with a minimum net area of 6,000 square feet. The proposed lot layout is shown on the preliminary plat map (Exhibit 1, Attachment 3). Vehicular access to Lot 1 is proposed to be directly off of 13th Way SW, while Lots 2 through 5 would gain access via a shared vehicular access tract (Tract 999). The existing single- family residence and associated improvements are to be removed. Preliminary formal plats are Type III- B decisions pursuant to ECDC 20.01.003 with the Hearing Examiner making the decision following a public hearing. Attachments: Exhibit 1: Staff Report with Attachments 1-24 Packet Pg. 78 2.2.a 4aC. I g9� CITY OF EDMONDS 121 5t" Avenue North, Edmonds WA 98020 Phone: 425.771.0220 • Fax: 425.771.0221 • Web: www.edmondswa.gov DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT • PLANNING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION REPORT & RECOMMENDATION TO THE HEARING EXAMINER Project: Jenkins Lane Five -Lot Subdivision File Number: PLN20170028 Date of Report: October 5, 2017 Reviewed By: f en Machuga, ssociate Planner Owner: Annette Kessler, PR of Leo William LeFevre Estate Applicant: Echelbarger Investments, LLC I. INTRODUCTION The applicant is proposing to subdivide a 33,177 square foot property located at 720 13th Way SW into five lots (Attachments 1- 5). The site is located within the Single -Family Residential, RS-6, zone, which allows lots with a minimum net area of 6,000 square feet. See the Zoning and Vicinity Map for reference (Attachment 16). The proposed lot layout is shown on the preliminary plat map (Attachment 3). Vehicular access to Lot 1 is proposed to be directly off of 13th Way SW, while Lots 2 through 5 would gain access via a shared vehicular access tract (Tract 999). The existing single-family residence and associated improvements are to be removed. A. Application 1. Owner: Annette Kessler, PR of Leo William LeFevre Estate 2. Applicant: Echelbarger Investments, LLC 3. Contact: Ken McIntyre, SDA Engineering 4. Site Location: 720 13th Way SW, Edmonds Tax Parcel 2703 25 003 14100 5. Request: To divide one lot with a total area of 33,177 square feet into five lots in a Single -Family Residential (RS-6) zone. Packet Pg. 79 2.2.a 6. Review Process: Preliminary formal plats are Type III-B decisions pursuant to ECDC 20.01.003 with the Hearing Examiner making the decision following a public hearing. Note: All code sections referenced in this report can be viewed via the City's website, located at www.edmondswa.gov. B. Application Materials: The subject application was submitted on June 23, 2017. The initial application materials included a land use application form (Attachment 1), cover letter (Attachment 2), preliminary plat and development plans which were since revised, legal descriptions of the proposed lots (Attachment 5), Edmonds Utilities Consortium form (Attachment 6), letter regarding water service availability from Olympic View Water and Sewer District (Attachment 7), copy of a sewer easement on 722 and 724 13th Way SW (Attachment 8), preliminary storm drainage report (Attachment 9), title report which was since revised, and adjacent property owner's list (within Attachment 22). The application was determined to be incomplete due to the lack of a SEPA environmental checklist, and a letter requesting additional information was sent to the applicant on July 21, 2017 (Attachment 10). On August 2, 2017, an additional letter requesting further information by the Engineering Division was sent to the applicant (Attachment 11). In response to these requests for additional information, the applicant submitted a cover letter (Attachment 12), revised preliminary plat map (Attachment 3), revised preliminary development plans which were since revised further, title report (Attachment 13), and environmental checklist (Attachment 14) on August 22, 2017. On September 8, 2017, the applicant submitted three revised sheets to the preliminary development plans. The latest versions of all preliminary development plan sheets are included for reference in Attachment 4. The application became procedurally complete pursuant to ECDC 20.02.002 on September 5, 2017, and a letter confirming such was sent to the applicant on September 15, 2017 (Attachment 15). II. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS A. Setting: The site is located within a single-family residential neighborhood in Edmonds. Refer to Attachment 16 for a zoning and vicinity map indicating the zoning of surrounding properties. The subject property and the surrounding area are zoned RS-6 (single-family residential; 6,000 square foot minimum lot size). The subject property is developed with an existing single- family residence and associated structures, including a pool and two sheds. Surrounding properties are much smaller in size than the subject site, but are also developed with single- family residences. B. Topography and Vegetation: Refer to the preliminary plat and preliminary development plans (Attachments 3 and 4 respectively) for a depiction of the existing conditions on the site, including the topography of the site and locations of existing trees. The subject site is relatively level. Vegetation throughout the site is that of typical residential landscaping including grass, shrubs, and trees. Existing vegetation can be seen in the aerial photograph provided in Attachment 24. The preliminary plat (Attachment 3) indicates approximately 21 existing trees on the subject site. The majority of these trees are evergreen and are located near the northeastern corner and along the southern side of the site, while a few of these trees are fruit trees located near the middle of the site. Additionally, a stand of approximately 16 evergreen trees exists within the City right- of-way adjacent to the northern side of the subject site. Jenkins Lane Five -Lot Subdivision File No. PLN20170028 Page 2 of 13 Packet Pg. 80 2.2.a C. Environmental Assessment 1. Critical Area: The subject property was reviewed and inspected for critical areas as defined by ECDC 23.40 under CRA20170091. It was determined that there were no critical areas on or adjacent to the subject property, and a waiver was issued (Attachment 17). 2. Shoreline: The subject property is not located within shoreline jurisdiction. 3. SEPA: Review under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) is required for formal subdivisions. The applicant's completed SEPA checklist is included as Attachment 14. A Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) was issued on September 19, 2017 for the proposed subdivision (Attachment 18). Notice of the DNS was posted, mailed to adjacent property owners and published in accordance with ECDC 20.03.004 (Attachment 22). No appeals of the SEPA determination were received. Comments received during the comment period are addressed below in Section II.D.2 of this staff report. D. Comments 1. Departmental Review: This project was reviewed by Snohomish County Fire District No. 1, the City of Edmonds Building Division, and the Engineering Division of the Public Works Department. Snohomish County Fire District No. 1 noted that in lieu of a 20-foot paved access road, residential fire sprinklers will be required in all structures and fire lane markings will be required (Attachment 19). Additionally, the Fire District noted that a new fire hydrant is required at the corner of 13t' Way SW and the proposed access road, and an emergency access gate switch/sensor will be required if an automatic gate will cross the private fire access road. A proposed condition of approval has been added regarding the Fire District's comments. The Building Division had no comments on the proposed subdivision (Attachment 20). The Engineering Division had initial comments on the application that were sent to the applicant on August 2, 2017 (Attachment 11). Following review of a subsequent resubmittal, the Engineering Division found the information provided indicates general engineering feasibility. Project -specific design, including final utility system design and location, as well as Title 18 Edmonds Community Development Code compliance, will be reviewed during the civil construction plan review phase of this project. The proposed subdivision is subject to the Engineering Requirements for the plat included in Attachment 21. 2. Public Notice and Comment: ECDC 20.03 provides the City's regulations for public notice requirements. A "Notice of Application, Public Hearing and SEPA Determination" dated September 19, 2017 with a comment period running through October 12, 2017 was posted at the subject site, Public Safety Complex, Development Services Department, and Library and published in the Everett Herald Newspaper on September 19, 2017. The notice was also mailed to property owners within 300 feet of the site on September 19, 2017 using a mailing list provided by the applicant. As required by ECDC 20.03.002.D.3, the "Notice of Application, Public Hearing and SEPA Determination" was mailed to the Town of Woodway since the subject site is located within less than one mile of the municipal boundaries of Woodway. Documentation of compliance with the public notice requirements is included as Attachment 22. Jenkins Lane Five -Lot Subdivision File No. PLN20170028 Page 3 of 13 Packet Pg. 81 2.2.a To date, the City has received only one written comment regarding the proposed subdivision, which was an email from Lynne Danielson, General Manager of Olympic View Water and Sewer District, who stated that the District has no comments and confirmed that "the drywells proposed for stormwater are located outside of the surface water protection zone" (Attachment 23). The applicant will need to work with Olympic View Water and Sewer District during the civil construction plan review phase to ensure any applicable requirements from Olympic View Water and Sewer District have been met. E. ECDC 20.75.080 General Findings A proposed subdivision may only be approved if all the general findings listed in ECDC 20.75.080 can be made for the proposal as approved or as conditionally approved. Staff s findings in regard to ECDC 20.75.080 are detailed below. 1. Subdivision Ordinance. The proposal is consistent the purposes of this chapter (as listed in ECDC 20.75.020) and meets all requirements of this chapter. The proposed five lot subdivision is consistent with ECDC 20.75.020 and all the requirements of the ECDC 20.75. The proposed subdivision will not negatively impact public health, safety or general welfare, will not negatively impact congestion on streets and highways, will have adequate access to water, utilities, sewerage, storm drainage and will provide proper ingress and egress as well as be uniformly monumented. 2. Comprehensive Plan. The proposal is consistent with the provisions of the Edmonds Comprehensive Plan, or other adopted city policy, and is in the public interest. The subject property is located within the "Single Family - Urban 1" Comprehensive Plan designation. The Comprehensive Plan has the following stated goals and policies for Residential Development that apply to this project. Residential Development A. Goal. High quality residential development which is appropriate to the diverse lifestyle of Edmonds residents should be maintained and promoted. The options available to the City to influence the quality of housing for all citizens should be approached realistically in balancing economic, social, aesthetic and environmental considerations. A.1. Encourage those building custom homes to design and construct homes with architectural lines which enable them to harmonize with the surroundings, adding to the community identity and desirability. A.3. Minimize encroachment on view of existing homes by new construction or additions to existing structures. A.4. Support retention and rehabilitation of older housing within Edmonds whenever it is economically feasible. A.S. Protect residential areas from incompatible land uses through the careful control of other types of development and expansion based upon the following principles: A.5.b. Traffic not directly accessing residences in a neighborhood must be discouraged. A.5.d. Private property must be protected from adverse environmental impacts of development including noise, drainage, traffic, slides, etc. Jenkins Lane Five -Lot Subdivision File No. PLN20170028 Page 4 of 13 Packet Pg. 82 2.2.a A.6. Require that new residential development be compatible with the natural constraints of slopes, soils, geology, drainage, vegetation and habitat. Compliance with the Residential Development goals and policies: The proposed subdivision will allow for the construction of five new single-family residences. Views in the neighborhood are local and should not be negatively impacted by the proposed development. Traffic impact fees consistent with Chapter 18.82 ECDC are collected with building permits for each individual lot to mitigate traffic impacts. The overall proposal should not cause any adverse impacts and appears to be consistent with the residential development goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. Vegetation and Wildlife A. Goal. The city should ensure that its woodlands, marshes and other areas containing natural vegetation are preserved, in accordance with the following policies: A.2. The removal of trees should be minimized, particularly when they are located on steep slopes or hazardous soils. Subdivision layouts, buildings and roads should be designed so that existing trees are preserved. A.3. Trees that are diseased, damaged, or unstable should be removed. A.4. Grading should be restricted to building pads and roads only. Vegetation outside these areas should be preserved. Compliance with Vegetation and Wildlife goals and policies: As noted above in Section II.B of this staff report, the site contains approximately 21 existing trees, and there is a stand of approximately 16 trees located within the City right-of-way adjacent to the northern property line of the subject site. Although the existing trees on the subject site are mainly located near the northeastern corner and along the southern side of the site, some of which are in locations that could be retained during future development of the proposed lots, the stand of trees within the City right-of-way will likely need to be removed in order for 131}i Way SW to be widened as necessary to meet the Engineering Requirements (Attachment 21). For the purposes of the subdivision, tree retention will be reviewed with the civil improvement plans with the subdivision. A recommended condition of approval has been added requiring a tree cutting plan to be submitted and approved with the civil plans for removal of trees impacted by the subdivision improvements. Any tree cutting proposed on the site that is not a hazardous situation and/or not necessary as part of the subdivision improvements shall be reviewed at the time of building permit application or through the appropriate land use permit application and review process. Therefore, staff finds that the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 3. Zoning Ordinance. The proposal meets all requirements of the zoning ordinance, or a modification has been approved as provided for in this chapter. The subject property is located in the RS-6 Single -Family Residential zone and is subject to the requirements of ECDC 16.20. Pursuant to ECDC 16.20.030 development standards of the RS-6 zone are as follows: Minimum Lot Area Maximum Minimum Minimum Minimum Minimum Maximum Maximum Parking Zone Density' Lot Width Street Side Rear Height Coverage (Sq. Ft.) Setback Setback Setback RS-6 6,000 7.3 60' 20' 5' 15' 25' 35% 2 Jenkins Lane Five -Lot Subdivision File No. PLN20170028 Page 5 of 13 Packet Pg. 83 2.2.a ' Density means "dwelling units per acre" determined by dividing the total lot area by the density allowed by the underlying zoning; the number of lots or units permitted shall be rounded down to the nearest whole number. Minimum Lot Area: The subject site is 37,177 square feet. The proposed lot areas are as follows: Required Lot Area Proposed Gross Area (sq. ft.) Proposed Net Area' (sq. ft.) Lot 1 6,000 6,360 6,360 Lot 2 6,000 6,077 6,077 Lot 3 6,000 6,150 6,150 Lot 4 6,000 6,049 6,049 Lot 5 6,000 6,121 6,121 Tract 999 0 2,420 2,420 'Note: Net lot area excludes the area of any vehicular ingress/egress easements. All five lots proposed for construction of single-family residences exceed the minimum required net area of 6,000 square feet per lot, which is compliant with the lot area requirements. Tract 999 is a private access road. This tract is not required to meet the minimum required lot area. Density: At 33,177 square feet, a total of five dwelling units may be developed on the subject property (0.76 acre * 7.3 dwelling units per acre). The applicant is proposing to develop the site with five single-family dwellings which is compliant with the density requirements. Minimum Lot Width: Pursuant to ECDC 21.55.050, lot width is the minimum diameter of a lot width circle that must fit within a lot (60 feet in this instance). A 60-foot diameter lot width circle was shown to fit inside each of the five proposed lots on the preliminary plat plans (Attachment 3); therefore the proposal is consistent with the lot width requirement. Corner Lots: None of the lots will be considered corner lots. Flag or Interior Lot Determination: Tract 999 does not meet the definition of street in ECDC 21.90.010 since it will serve less than five lots. This tract will provide access to Lots 2 through 5, while Lot 1 will be accessed separately directly off of 13t' Way SW. Therefore, Lots 2, 3, and 4 will not front on a street and will be considered flag lots. Setbacks: Based on the development standards for the RS-6 zone, setbacks for the proposed lots should be as follows: Lot 1: Street Setback (20 feet): From the northern property line and from the portion of the eastern property line adjacent to the City right-of-way. Side Setbacks (5 feet): From eastern and western property lines. Rear Setback (15 feet): From the southern property line. Lot 2: Side Setback (5 feet): From all property lines. Lot 3: Side Setback (5 feet): From all property lines. Lot 4: Side Setback (5 feet): From all property lines. Jenkins Lane Five -Lot Subdivision File No. PLN20170028 Page 6 of 13 Packet Pg. 84 2.2.a Lot 5: Street Setback (20 feet): From the northern property line and from the curved northwestern property line where adjacent to the City right-of-way. Side Setback (5 feet): From eastern and western property lines. Rear Setback (15 feet): From southern property line. The existing single-family residence and associated improvements overlap the property lines between the proposed lots and, therefore, would not comply with the site development standards applicable to the proposed lots. A recommended condition of approval requires these structures to be removed prior to final plat approval. Setback compliance for new structures will be determined at the time of building permit review. The setbacks indicated on the preliminary plat map (Attachment 3) and preliminary development plans (Attachment 4) are shown for reference purposes only and vest no right. Lot Coverage of Existing Buildings on Proposed Lots: With the demolition of the existing residence and associated structures, there will be no structures on the subject property, so coverage after the proposed subdivision would be 0% on all the lots. Compliance with the coverage requirements will be evaluated with future building permits. Parkin: Single-family residences are required to provide two off-street parking spaces. Compliance with this standard will be reviewed with future building permits for the proposed lots. With proposed conditions, staff finds the proposal is consistent the zoning requirements for the RS-6 zone as contained in ECDC 16.20. 4. Flood Plain Management. The proposal meets all requirements of the Edmonds Community Development code relating to flood plain management. The proposed project is not located within a designated flood plain management area. F. ECDC 20.75.085 — Review Criteria. Pursuant to ECDC 20.75.085, the following criteria shall be used to review proposed subdivisions: 1. Environmental. a. Where environmental resources existing, such as trees, streams, ravines or wildlife habitats, the proposal shall be designed to minimize significant adverse impacts to resources. Permanent restrictions may be imposed on the proposal to avoid impact. Vegetation throughout the site is that of typical residential landscaping including grass, shrubs, and trees. The site survey (included within Attachments 3 and 4) indicates 21 existing trees on the subject site. The majority of these trees are evergreen and are located near the northeastern corner and along the southern side of the site, while a few of these trees are fruit trees located near the middle of the site. Additionally, a stand of approximately 16 evergreen trees exists within the City right-of-way adjacent to the northern side of the subject site. No streams, ravines or other environmental resources are present on the site. The City promotes the retention of as many trees as practicable and encourages the location of building areas with the goal of retaining as many of the trees as possible. For the purposes of the subdivision, tree retention will be reviewed with the civil improvement plans with the subdivision. As noted above in section II.E.2 of this staff Jenkins Lane Five -Lot Subdivision File No. PLN20170028 Page 7 of 13 Packet Pg. 85 report, although it appears that some of the existing trees located around the perimeter of the subject site could be retained during future development of the proposed lots, the stand of trees within the City right-of-way will likely need to be removed in order for 13t' Way SW to be widened as necessary to meet Engineering Requirements (Attachment 21). Therefore, with the recommended condition of approval related to tree retention, staff finds that the proposed subdivision is consistent with this criterion. b. The proposal shall be designed to minimize grading by using shared driveways and by relating street, house site and lot placement to the existing topography. The proposal minimizes grading because the subject site is relatively level. Additionally, the development proposes a shared access tract (Tract 999) to provide vehicular access to Lots 2 through 5. Lot 1 is proposed to have individual access directly off of 13th Way SW; however, the site is relatively level, so there should not be a significant amount of increased grading due to Lot 1 having its own access driveway. The proposed lot placement provides for future home sites that appear to conform to the exiting topography. Therefore, staff finds that the proposed subdivision is consistent with this criterion. c. Where conditions exist which could be hazardous to the future residents of the land to be divided, or to nearby residents or property, such as flood plains, steep slopes or unstable soil or geologic conditions, a subdivision of the hazardous land shall be denied unless the condition can be permanently corrected, consistent with paragraphs A(1) and (2) of this section (Section II.F. La and II.F. Lb of this staff report). No known hazardous conditions, such as flood plains, steep slopes, or unstable soil or geologic conditions exist at this site. Therefore, staff finds that the proposed subdivision is consistent with this criterion. d. The proposal shall be designed to minimize off -site impacts on drainage, views and so forth. The proposed development must be designed to meet current code and minimize stormwater impacts. All new hard surfaces must be mitigated on site consistent with ECDC Chapter 18.30 (Stormwater Management) and as required by the Engineering Requirements (Attachment 21). The maximum height for a new house in the RS-6 zone is 25 feet from average original grade, which serves to minimize the negative impact to existing views in the vicinity. Aside from the height limits, the Edmonds Community Development Code does not contain specific regulations regarding private view protection within single-family zones. Therefore, staff finds that the proposed subdivision is consistent with this criterion. 2. Lot and Street Layout. a. Lots shall be designed to contain a usable building area. If the building area would be difficult to develop, the lot shall be redesigned or eliminated, unless special conditions can be imposed on the approval which will ensure that the lot is developed properly. All five lots of the proposed subdivision have been designed to accommodate single- family residences within the required setbacks for the RS-6 zone. The subject property is relatively level and should not be difficult to develop. Based on a review of the Jenkins Lane Five -Lot Subdivision File No. PLN20170028 Page 8 of 13 Packet Pg. 86 project and the analysis in this section, staff agrees that a five -lot plat may be developed consistent with this requirement. Therefore, staff finds that the proposed subdivision is consistent with this criterion. b. Lots shall not front on highways, arterials or collector streets unless there is no other feasible access. Special access provisions, such as shared driveways, turnarounds or frontage streets may be required to minimize traffic hazards. None of the proposed lots will front on a highway, arterial, or collector street. Therefore, staff finds that the proposed subdivision is consistent with this criterion. c. Each lot shall meet the applicable dimensional requirements of the zoning ordinance. The subject property is located within the RS-6 zone. See Section II.E.3 for a discussion of compliance with the applicable zoning standards. All proposed lots contain at least 6,000 square feet and are at least 60 feet in width and thus compliant with the dimensional requirements of the RS-6 zone. Therefore, staff finds that the proposed subdivision is consistent with this criterion. d. Pedestrian walks or bicycle paths shall be provided to serve schools, parks, public facilities, shorelines and streams where street access is not adequate. The subject parcel is primarily served by three area schools: Sherwood Elementary School, College Place Middle School, and Edmonds Woodway High School. According to information that is made available on the Edmonds School District website (www.edmonds.wednet.edu, accessed on October 5, 2017), bus service is provided to all three schools. The bus stop for service to/from Sherwood Elementary School is located at the intersection of 8th Ave. S and 13th Way SW, the bus stop for service to/from College Place Middle School is located at the intersection of 8th Ave. S and 14th St. SW, the bus stop for service to Edmonds Woodway High School is also located at the intersection of 8th Ave. S and 14th St. SW, and the bus stop for service from Edmonds Woodway High School is located at the intersection of 7th Pl. S and 15th St. SW. The subject site is located approximately 350 feet from the intersection of 8th Ave. S and 13th Way SW. An existing sidewalk begins on the northern side of 13th Way SW at the northeastern corner of the intersection of 13th Way SW and 7th Pl. S and continues towards the east to the intersection with 8th Ave. S. The subject site is located approximately 550 feet from the intersection of 8th Ave. S and 14th St. SW. Refer to the above description of sidewalks available to the intersection of 8th Ave. S and 13th Way SW. Continuing to the south to the intersection of 8th Ave. S and 14th St. SW is an unimproved shoulder along the west side of 8th Ave. S between 13th Way SW and 14th St. SW. The subject site is located approximately 1,200 feet from the intersection of 7th Pl. S and 15th St. SW. Refer to the above descriptions regarding access to the intersection of 8th Ave. S and 14th St. SW. Continuing further to the south along 8th Ave. S from the intersection with 14th St. SW is an existing sidewalk along the eastern side of 8th Ave. S that leads all the way to the intersection with 15t' St. SW where there is a sidewalk along the south side of 15th St. SW leading to the intersection with 7th Pl. S. Sidewalks are not required adjacent to the subject site per the Engineering Requirements (Attachment 21). Sidewalks are only required on one side of 13th Way SW, and sidewalk alignment has already been established along the north side of the Jenkins Lane Five -Lot Subdivision File No. PLN20170028 Page 9 of 13 Packet Pg. 87 2.2.a road. Since the subject site is located on the south side of 13th Way SW, sidewalks are not required along the frontage of the subject site. Therefore, staff finds that the proposed subdivision is consistent with this criterion. 3. Dedications a. The city council may require dedication of land in the proposed subdivision for public use. b. Only the city council may approve a dedication ofpark land to satisfy the requirements of ECDC 20.75.090. The council may request a review and written recommendation from the planning advisory board. c. Any approval of a subdivision shall be conditioned on appropriate dedication of land for streets, including those on the official street map and the preliminary plat. Per the City Engineering Division requirements (Attachment 21), no dedications are required. See Section II.G below regarding the dedication of park land. 4. Improvements. a. Improvements which may be required, but are not limited to, streets, curbs, pedestrian walks and bicycle paths, sidewalks, street landscaping, water lines, sewage systems, drainage systems and underground utilities. b. The person or body approving a subdivision shall determine the improvements necessary to meet the purposes and requirements of this chapter, and the requirements Of.. i. ECDC Title 18, Public Works Requirements; ii. Chapter 19.75, Fire Code, as to fire hydrants, water supply and access. This determination shall be based on the recommendations of the community development director, the public works director, and the fire chief. The subject project was reviewed by Snohomish County Fire District 1 and the Engineering Division. Improvements required in conjunction with the subject proposal are included in Attachment 21. The Engineering Requirements (Attachment 21) incorporate the Fire District's requirement for a new fire hydrant, while a recommended condition of approval has also been added referencing the Fire District's comments (Attachment 19). Therefore, staff finds that the proposed subdivision is consistent with this criterion. c. The use of septic systems may be approved if all of the following conditions are met i. It is more than 200 feet, multiplied by the number of lots in the proposed subdivision, from the nearest public sewer main to the nearest boundary of the land to be divided. ii. The land to be divided is zoned RS-6. iii. The public works director and city health officer determine that soil, drainage and slope conditions are satisfactory for septic use and that all requirements of WAC 248-96-090 are met. There are no septic systems included as part of the proposed project. 5. Flood Plain Management. All subdivisions shall comply with the criteria set forth in the Edmonds community Development code for flood plain management. The subject property is not located within a Flood Plain Management area. Jenkins Lane Five -Lot Subdivision File No. PLN20170028 Page 10 of 13 Packet Pg. 88 G. ECDC 20.75.090 — Park Land Dedication. According to ECDC 20.75.090, before or concurrent with the approval of the final plat of any subdivision, the subdivider shall dedicate land, pay a fee in -lieu of dedication, or do a combination of both, for park and recreational purposes. With the adoption of Ordinance 3934 in 2013, park impacts are now addressed through the assessment of park impact fees in accordance with Edmonds City Code (ECC) Chapter 3.36. No park dedication or fees are required with the subdivision. Park impact fees will be assessed with issuance of the future building permits on the new lots consistent with ECC Chapter 3.36. III. DECISION ON SUBDIVISION Based upon the Findings of Fact, Conclusions, and Attachments to this staff report, staff recommends the Hearing Examiner APPROVE the application for a five -lot plat on the property located at 720 13`' Way SW subject to the following conditions: 1. This application is subject to all applicable requirements contained in the Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC). It is the responsibility of the applicant to ensure compliance with all applicable requirements. 2. The applicant is responsible for obtaining all local, state, and/or federal permits or approvals applicable to the proposal. 3. The existing single-family residence and associated improvements must be demolished prior to final approval of the subdivision. Contact the Building Division for demolition permit requirements prior to conducting such work. 4. Prior to recording, the applicant must complete the following requirements: a. Civil plans must be approved prior to recording. In completing the civil plans, the following must be addressed: i. Complete the Engineering Division conditions listed "Required as a Condition of Subdivision" on Attachment 21. ii. Comply with the applicable requirements stated in the Fire District memorandum in Attachment 19. iii. A tree cutting plan shall be submitted and approved with the civil plans for removal of trees impacted by the subdivision improvements. Any tree cutting proposed on the site that is not a hazardous situation and/or not necessary as part of the subdivision improvements shall be reviewed at the time of building permit application or through the appropriate land use permit application and review process. All trees that are to be retained during the development process and trees located on adjacent properties must be protected according to the performance standards found in ECDC 18.45.050.H. If during construction it is realized that certain trees that were planned to be retained will be damaged due to the construction activities, replacement may be required per ECDC 18.45.050.F. b. Make the following revisions to the plat: i. Indicate the locations of all new easements, and provide easement descriptions and maintenance provisions for all new easements. ii. Indicate the gross and net areas of each lot on the final plat. iii. Include on the plat all required information, including owner's certification, hold harmless agreement, Development Services and Public Works director's approval blocks. Jenkins Lane Five -Lot Subdivision File No. PLN20170028 Page 11 of 13 Packet Pg. 89 2.2.a c. Make sure all documents to be recorded meet the Snohomish County Auditor's requirements for recording. 5. Submit an updated copy of the title report (plat certificate) with the documents proposed to be recorded. The title report must be prepared within 30 days of submittal for final review. 6. Submit two copies of the documents to be recorded for the Planning Division and Engineering Division's approval. Once approved, the documents must be recorded with the Snohomish County Auditor's office. 7. After recording the plat, the applicant must complete the following: a. Complete the Engineering Division conditions listed "Required as a Condition of Building Permit" in Attachment 21. IV. APPEAL Pursuant to ECDC 20.07.004, a party of record may submit a written appeal of a Type III-B decision within 14 days after the date of issuance of the decision. The appeal shall be made in writing and shall include all required information stated in ECDC 20.07.004.D as well as the applicable fee. The appeal would be heard at a closed record hearing before the City Council according to the requirements of ECDC Chapter 20.07. V. LAPSE OF APPROVAL Section 20.75.100.A states, "Approval of a preliminary plat shall expire and have no further validity at the end of the time period established under RCW 58.17.140, unless the applicant has acquired final plat approval prior to the expiration date established under RCW 58.17.140." RCW 58.17.140.3(a) provides: Except as provided by (b) of this subsection, a final plat meeting all requirements of this chapter shall be submitted to the legislative body of the city, town, or county for approval within seven years of the date of preliminary plat approval if the date of preliminary plat approval is on or before December 31, 2014, and within five years of the date ofpreliminary plat approval if the date of preliminary plat approval is on or after January 1, 2015. Since preliminary approval (if approved by the Hearing Examiner) will be after January 1, 2015, this preliminary plat approval shall be valid for five years from the date of the issuance of the Hearing Examiner's decision, or in the event that the decision of the Hearing Examiner is appealed to the Edmonds City Council and/or Snohomish County Superior Court, the time period shall commence upon the date of final confirmation of the preliminary plat decision by the City Council or judiciary. VI. NOTICE TO COUNTY ASSESSOR The property owner may, as a result of the decision rendered on the subject application, request a change in the valuation of the property by the Snohomish County Assessor's Office. VIL PARTIES OF RECORD City of Edmonds Annette Kessler 121 — 5`h Avenue North PR of Leo William LeFevre Estate Edmonds, WA 98020 22720 Brier Rd. Brier, WA 98036 Jenkins Lane Five -Lot Subdivision File No. PLN20170028 Page 12 of 13 Packet Pg. 90 2.2.a Todd Echelbarger Echelbarger Investments, LLC 4001 198f' St. SW, #2 Lynnwood, WA 98036 VIIL ATTACHMENTS Ken McIntyre SDA Engineering 1724 Marine View Dr., Suite #140 Everett, WA 98201 1. Land Use Application 2. Applicant Cover Letter 3. Preliminary Plat Map 4. Preliminary Development Plans 5. Legal Descriptions 6. Edmonds Utility Consortium Form 7. Water Service Availability Letter 8. Sewer Easement on 722 and 724 13' Way SW 9. Preliminary Storm Drainage Report 10. Letter of Incomplete Application 11. Engineering Division Request for Additional Info 12. Resubmittal Cover Letter 13. Title Report 14. SEPA Checklist 15. Letter of Complete Application 16. Zoning and Vicinity Map 17. Critical Area File Number CRA20170091 18. SEPA Determination of Nonsignificance 19. Snohomish County Fire District No. 1 Comments 20. Building Division Comments 21. Engineering Memorandum of Compliance and Requirements for Plat 22. Public Notice Documentation 23. Email from Olympic View Water and Sewer District, received 9/19/17 24. Aerial Photograph Jenkins Lane Five -Lot Subdivision File No. PLN20170028 Page 13 of 13 Packet Pg. 91 I 2.2.a I City of Edmonds Land Use Application 0 ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN REVIEW ❑ COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT ❑ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ❑ HOME OCCUPATION F1 FORMAL SUBDIVISION D SHORT SUBDIVISION ❑ LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT J PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ❑ OFFICIAL STREET MAP AMENDMENT Ci STREET VACATION ❑ REZONE SHORELINE PERMIT VARIANCE / REASONABLE USE EXCEPTION ❑ OTHER: • PLEASE NOTE THAT ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED WITHIN THE APPLICATION IS A PUBLIC RECORD f PROPERTY ADDRESS OR LOCATION 720 13th Way SW, Edmonds WA 98020 PROJECT NAME (IF APPLICABLE) Jenkins Lane PROPERTY OWNER Annette Kessler. PR of Leo William LeFevre Estate PHONE # 425.670.3314 ADDRESS 22720 Brier Road Brier W A. 98036 E-MAIL Beach4me ,frontier.com FAX # TAX ACCOUNT # 27032500314100 SEC. 25 TWP. 27 RNG. 03 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT OR PROPOSED USE (ATTACH COVER LETTER AS NECESSARY) DESCRIBE HOW THE PROJECT MEETS APPLICABLE CODES (ATTACH COVER LETTER AS NECESSARY) APPLICANT Echelbar2er Investments, LLC PHONE # 425.673.1100 ADDRESS 4001 198th St. SW. #2 Lynnwood. WA 98036 E-MAIL Todd@Echelbarger.com FAX # CONTACT PERSON/AGENT Ken McIntyre, SDA En incerin PHONE # 425.486.6533 ext. 104 ADDRESS 1724 Marine View Drive, Suite #140 Everett, WA 98201 E-MAIL Kincintyre@sdaengineers.com FAX # 425.486.5693 The undersigned applicant, and his/her/its heirs, and assigns, in consideration on the processing of the application agrees to release, indemnify, defend and hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any and all damages, including reasonable attorney's fees, arising from any action or infraction based in whole or part upon false, misleading, inaccurate or incomplete information furnished by the applicant, his/her/its agents or employees. By my signature, I certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that I am authorized to file this appiication on the behalf o€the owner as listed below. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT/AGENT DATE 6.20.2017 Property Owner's Authorization. I, Annette Kessler PR of Leo William LeFevre Estate certify under the penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that the following is a true and correct statement: 1 have authorized the above Applicant/Agent to apply for the subject land use application, and grant my permission for the public officials and the staff of the City of Edmonds to enter the subject property for the purposes of inspection and posting attendant to this application. SIGNATURE OF OWNER �O•—���� DATE Questiorts? Call (425) 771-0220. 6.20.2017 Revised on 8122112 B - Land Use Application ruge1 UJI ATTAC Packet Pg. 92 2.2.a S DIA June 23, 2017 City of Edmonds 121 Fifth Avenue N. Edmonds, WA 98020 Jenkins Lane Short Plat Preliminary Plat Cover Letter SDA Project Number 186-003-17 To Whom it May Concern: BEGET ■ED JIJN 2 3 2017 C5UNTL''8'9E fMCES Please find the attached package of submittal materials for the Jenkins Lane Short Plat preliminary plat. The applicant is requesting preliminary approval of a 5-lot single family residential subdivision on 0.84 acres currently zoned RS-6, and designated for Low Density Residential development within the comprehensive plan. All of the proposed lots will be served with public sewer and water. A storm water system has been designed to comply with all applicable local and state regulations. New utilities for this plat will be constructed underground. ECC 16.20.030 Lots — Minimum Area The project site resides in the sub -district of RS-6. Per the development standards outlined in section 16.20.030 of the Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code (ECC), the minimum lot area for the RS-6 zoning designation is 6,000 square feet. All proposed lots meet this minimum area and the smallest lot on our site is 6,058 square feet. ECC 16.20.030 Lots - Setbacks The table of site development standards found in section 16.20.030 details that the minimum setback requirements for sub -district RS-6. The minimum street setback is 20-feet, minimum side setback is 5-feet, and the minimum rear setback is 15-feet. All proposed lots have been designed to comply with and meet these requirements. ECC 18.80.010 Street Standards The applicant has a proposed right of way on the project site to service 4 lots with the other lot being serviced by 13t" Way SW. Per section 18.80.010 of the ECC, the minimum width of a right of way servicing 3 to 4 lots in Zone RS-6 is 20-feet and the minimum pavement width is 16-feet. The proposed right of way has been designed with a width of 20-feet and includes a 16-foot paved section, both of which comply with the standards outlined. _ECC 20.75.085 Frontage Improvements The applicant is proposing frontage improvement along 13t" Way SW. The improvement consists of a concrete curb, gutter, and an expansion of the existing pavement section. There is also a proposed fire hydrant at the entrance of the lot to comply with the fire code. SDA 1724 W. Marine View Drive; Suite 140 ATTAC Packet Pg. 93 Everett, WA 98201 2.2.a City of Edmonds June 23, 2017 Jenkins Lane Short Plat Cover Letter' Page 2 ECC 18.30.060 Stormwater Management The proposed project is classified as a Category 1 project site, as defined in section 18.30.060 of the ECC, and must meet minimum requirements number 1 through number 5. The applicant has proposed how to manage flow control for the project with an infiltration gallery for the new roadway and drywell systems for the individual lots.. Water quality will be provided with a stormwater filter vault to treat the proposed pollution generating impervious surfaces. The required stormwater pollution prevention plan (SWPPP) has been provided in the drainage report. We look forward to working with the City of Edmonds on the preliminary plat approval of this project. If you have any questions regarding this submittal please feel free to email me at kmcintyre -_sdaen_, ineers.com or call me at 425-486-6533 x104. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, SDA �) A--., 4r Ken McIntyre, PE Senior Civil Engineer SDA 1724 W. Marine View Drive; Suite 140 Packet Pg. 94 Everett. WA 98201 2.2.a I I ---------- I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I-------------- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I NOTES 14 00657000001400 1 27032500314400 2 27032500314300 FOUND 3" BRASS DISK SURFACE W/X. APRIL 2017. s oo� \ CURVE TABLE � 2 CURVE RADIUS LENGTH ANGLE Cl 257.79' 65.70' 14'36'09" C2 25779 10.57 2'2100 C3 257.79' 55.13' 12'15'09" C4 20.00 31.42 -To '00 00 LINE TABLE V LINE BEARING DISTANCE ` \ L 1 N 01'3734" E 25.01 ' L2 N 88'22 26 W 20.06 L3 N 05'5732" E 4.36' � so I I FOUND 3" BRASS DISK \ \ SURFACE W/X. APRIL 1 I I 17. ------------= I I \ I --- 2.P6- I \ I of \ I 1 Io 0 zl �0 in �i 1 I In I� ni In aAol 12 Ic, I I 1 1 I I 00657000001200 i I 10 m V1 00657000001100 I I I' o I ' i 00657000001000 I I BIRCH ADD. DIV. 2 I I \ SSMH RIM=279.85 VOL. 37, PG. 71- 72 � J I � i CENTER CHANNEL i a 8" DI FORCE MAIN=272.65 T I I / y CB RIM=274.06 7 ------------ -- i ' IE 12" RCP(E)=271.86 % I I / I Lrs CONCRETE CURB I z 13 TH WA Y S. W �- - / - \ _ FOUND 3" BRASS DISK ---- --------�------ -' _ _ _ CP N 88°2226" W 31� � _ ° SURFACE MON. NO PUNCH, < F5 < I PROPOSED DRIVEWAY ACCESS EL.=279t - - - - - - - -�` �`'����/// 7_ SHOT CENTER. APRIL 2017. I 226.15' '�----------- -- i I /� /� �.� 22� �8� 18" 24" 20" _ 70.65' --- ------ I P _ _P �" 22.98' - - ' P�, I --,,' 0 - -P-- 18 20 �P JW�11;11�VPASS DISK 0 \ ;n ON. WIX. DIN 88'2226" W177.bhr - - / �' F ��44. w 95 20106'. 7 CB RIM=268.11 \ 10' I 10, IE 12" RCP(E)=265.96 / -- CONCRETE CURB I ' - - - I El I---------------- BSBL TYP. --------- I , - -- 8„ BSBL TYP.- \ t FOUND REBAR W/CAP STAMPED �\ �`� '7RI-CO 14490" 10'(SW) 0/S v 6,360 SF a \ 14» I N-- r � I P 10"/ Of r 1 1 1 ©w I �\-- -- - ----- / \ i `-- u \ BSBL TYP. 2' P / 6,121 SIF' w I o FOUNTAIN!282' y� P !/ HOUSE 18 AP \ �-V i f� 1722 AP uiuiuw��miu� wC I ,`� IM III• tlNYllll 1111�ta�dpl1 O O I I 25' ACCESS & UTILITY 25' S - / I h EASEMENT A.F.18012150166 �I \ 2 i� ` I o I / BSBL TYP. / 00641000000100 I o I I 10' SEWER �' ,'j EASEMENT / BSBL TYP. �� I �SPHALT �✓� 1 ' CB RIM=279.91 I ; � - - - - - - - � �( 2 IE 8" CMP(S)=278.06 I GRASS I / 6,077 SF / \ / \ PER AFN EASEMENT10' SS 02170252 I 1 I IE 4" CPP(E)=278.36 I ° - �\ L O T 4 , NCE COR. 0.2'(6 / \ °� , i / PROP. LINE / \ / N 88'12��11 I �Tj ; / 1 27032500314100 l /----------�--- - - - - � W' 111�3�2D1� I �� ° 33,177 SQ. FT. � � `O \ 6� cV 10' SEWER / 10' I 10. ���-- I-- I EASEMENT - - - - - - - - - ------------- I � ----------- - _ _ _ _ _ _ HOUSE J� ° / - - - I % BSBL TYP. #720 �%� a / OUND REBAR W/CAP - I SSMH RIM=274.93 ,I\ %° ` / / STAMPED 'TRI-CO 14490" I I CTR. CHAN. 8" PVC (E&W)=268.23 BSBL TYP + 0 0 1 '(W) OF PROP LINE N _,jig!SE WER I��r121121$?II✓�I Ifi- 4 I \ BSBL TYP. \ Co GRASS\ / -Z: 6,049 SF N ��3 \ / ° I a 6,150 SF 27032500314200 / 1 1/ PAVERS - SHEDIJ CONCRETE°° - xlk�J/TTTTT/T/T Q ° Y a o °® � ° e\ / IN, SHED TBR / / \ F� NCE COR. 0.3'O 16 S. +� / PROP. LINE JI E P OO - - 1I 18„ F 0" 22" 30' 12 G0390100001200 1.) THIS SURVEY HAS BEEN PREPARED FOR THE EXCLUSIVE USE OF PARTIES WHOSE NAMES APPEAR HEREON ONLY, AND DOES NOT EXTEND TO ANY UNNAMED THIRD PARTIES WITHOUT EXPRESS RECERTIFICATION BY THE LAND SURVEYOR. 2.) BOUNDARY LINES SHOWN AND CORNERS SET REPRESENT DEED LOCATIONS; OWNERSHIP LINES MAY VARY. NO GUARANTEE OF OWNERSHIP IS EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED. THIS SURVEY PERFORMED WITHOUT THE BENEFIT OF A TITLE REPORT AND DOES NOT PURPORT TO SHOW ALL EASEMENTS, RESTRICTIONS, RESERVATIONS, AND OCCUPATION WHICH MAY ENCUMBER TITLE TO OR USE OF THIS PROPERTY. O BSBL TYP.- - - - - - - ------- - --I F _ _ BSBL TYP.14 i\ 0 --L - P 0 `v F 30'% � I ------------------------- x X - - 1'� 80' X X X P P - ----- � J FENCE 1, 3 (N) AT/ NCE 1.2'(N) AT TEMP. 1.25'(N) 0/S. I xt- ------ .. PROP. COR. I 'X" ON TIMBER AT 1 I N 8822 26" W 173.86' � \ FENCE INT. 1.4I I '(N) FOUND NAIL IN ---- -------------r------------------------------ BASE OF FENCE I FENCE 1'(N) 0/S OF PROP. LINE 00390100001100 1 0 9 00390100001000 00390100000900 eEL AIR Div. V1116 VOL. 20. P&. I� IIIII I I i I I I I I I I --------------------- .................... J I I I I I I I I I I I 2 i I 00647000000200 I I i SUNI t T I I I VOL. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I -----------------I 8 00390100000800 7 00390100000700 Pacifiast Surveys, Inc. LAND SURVEYING &MAPPING OWNER/APPLICANT LEO W. LEFEVRE TODD ECHELBARGER 720 13TH WAY SW C/0 ECHELBARGER HOMES & LAND EDMONDS, WA. 98020 4001 198TH ST. S. W. SUITE 12 LYNNWOOD, WA. 98036 425.673.1100 PROJECT INFORMATION TAX PARCEL: 27032500314100 SITE ADDRESS: 720 13TH WAY SW EDMONDS, WA. 98020 SITE AREA: 33,177 S.F. - 0.76 ACRE CURRENT ZONING: RS-6 SINGLE FAMILY 6,000 SF LOTS PROPOSED ZONING: RS-6 SINGLE FAMILY 6,000 SF LOTS PROPOSED LAND USE: 5 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES PROPOSED LOTS: 5 WATER: OLYMPIC VIEW WATER DISTRICT SEWER: OLYMPIC VIEW SEWER DISTRICT POWER: SNOHOMISH COUNTY PUD NO. 1 GAS: PUGET SOUND ENERGY TELEPHONE. FRONTIER CABLE. • COMCAST SCHOOL DISTRICT. • EDMONDS SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 15 FIRE DISTRICT. EDMONDS FIRE DISTRICT NO. 1 MINIMUM SETBACKS: FRONT 20' GARAGE 20' SIDE 5' REAR 15' TOTAL PARCEL AREA 33,177 S.F. LOT 1 6,360 S.F. LOT 2 6,077 S.F. LOT 3 6,150 S.F. LOT 4 6,049 S.F. LOT 5 6,121 S.F. TRACT 999 2,420 S.F. EQUIPMENT &PROCEDURES METHOD OF SURVEY SURVEY PERFORMED BY FIELD TRAVERSE INSTRUMENTATION: LEICA TS15 ROBOTIC ELECTRONIC TOTAL STATION PRECISION: MEETS OR EXCEEDS STATE STANDARDS WAC 332-130-090 BASIS OF BEARING: THE MONUMENTED CENTERLINE OF 7TH PL. S., AS THE BEARING OF N 01'37'34" E, PER THE PLAT OF BIRCH ADDITION DIV. NO. 2 RECORDED IN VOLUME 37 OF PLATS, PAGES 71- 72, RECORDS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON. LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL 4, CITY OF EDMONDS SHORT PLAT NO. S-50-79, RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 8108120198, BEING A PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 25, TOWNSHIP 27 NORTH, RANGE 3 EAST, W.M., IN SNOHOMISH COUNTY WASHINGTON. SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH, STATE OF WASHINGTON. VERTICAL DATUM NAVD 88 FOUND 3" BRASS SURFACE MON. AT INTERSECTION OF 13TH WAY S.W. & 7TH PL. S. ELEV. = 268.33' PER GPS OBSERVATIONS LEGEND • SET 1/2" X 24" REBAR W/CAP STAMPED "L.S. 37536" O EXISTING REBAR W/CAP, AS NOTED OFOUND CONCRETE MONUMENT AS NOTED RIGHT OF WAY CENTERLINE ❑ CATCH BASIN m WATER VALVE ❑ ICV IRRIGATION CONTROL VALVE ® WATER METER Sa) SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE o MAILBOX -0- UTILITY/POWER POLE GUY ANCHOR © POWER VAULT L�I�P►II��:Z�1►1�7jI:7�a DECIDUOUS TREE F FIR P PINE E ELM AP APPLE WC WILD CHERRY SCALE: 1" = 20' 0 20 40 PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR: ECHELBARGER HOMES & LAND P.O. BOX 13619 MILL CREEK, WA 98082 NE 114, SW 4, SEC.25, T.27N., R.3E., W.M. PH. 425•512.7099 FAX 425.357.3577 DRAWN BY DATE DRAWING FILE NAME SCALE JOB NO. www.PCSurveys.net MAH 8.16.17 171279tOP.dwg _ _ 1" = 20' J 17-1»c Packet Pg. 95 NE 1/4, SW 1/4, SEC. 25, T.27N., R.M., W.M. VICINITY MAP 2.2.a N , I °' I f0 Ip N.T.S. 0 Q Cn SURVEYOR PACIFIC COAST SURVEYS, INC. P.O. BOX 13619 MILL CREEK, WA 98082 (425) 512-7099 CONTACT: DARREN J. RIDDLE, PLS ENGINEER SITE DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATES 1724 W. MARINE VIEW DRIVE #140 EVERETT, WA. 98201 (425) 486-6533 ex. 111 kmcintyre®sdaengineers.com CONTACT: KEN MCINTYRE, PE ESTATE OF LEO LEFEVRE 22720 BRIER ROAD BRIER WA 98036 APPLICANT ECHELBARGER INVESTMENTS, LLC 4001 198TH ST. SW. #2 LYNNWOOD, WA 98036 UTILITY LOCATE '81 1' PUGET SOUND ENERGY 1140 N 94TH ST, SEATTLE, WA 98103 1-888-225-5773 SNOHOMISH CO. PUD P.O. BOX 1107 EVERETT, WA 98206 (425) 783-1000 TAX PARCELS 27032500314100 SITE ADDRESS 720 13TH WAY SW EDMONDS, WA 98020 ZONING VERTICAL DATUMN NAVD 88 FOUND 3" BRASS SURFACE MON. AT INTERSECTION OF 13TH WAY S.W. & 7TH PL. S. ELEV. = 268.33' PER GPS OBSERVATIONS BASIS OF BEARINGS THE MONUMENTED CENTERLINE OF 7TH PL. S., AS THE BEARING OF N 01°37'34" E, PER THE PLAT OF BIRCH ADDITION DIV. NO. 2 RECORDED IN VOLUME 37 OF PLATS, PAGES 71-72M RECORDS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON. CONSTRUCTION HOURS WEEKDAYS: 7AM-6PM SATURDAY ONLY: 10AM-6PM NO WORK SUNDAYS AND/OR FEDERAL HOLIDAYS CITY OF EDMONDS SEWER/STORM PURVEYOR PUBLIC WORKS & UTILITIES DEPARTMENT 7110 21OTH ST SW EDMONDS, WA 98020 (425) 771-0235 JENKINS LANE Cn o a N 1 I I I o WATER PURVEYOR Z OLYMPIC VIEW WATER/SEWER DIST Bowao,N 3 8128 228TH ST SW LIMINA Y PLAT C)_ _ W w EDMONDS, WA 98026-8449 PROJECT s ¢ ¢ I l l o PHONE: (425)774-7769 LOCATION F I l l z COMCAST SEPTEMBER 6 2017 12645 STONE AVE N ' SEATTLE, WA 98133 CONTACT: MIKE FONTENOT PHONE: (425)263-5482 PHONE: 866 771-2281 FRONTIER 15 SW EVERETT MALL WAY Civil Engineering SUITE D Project Management EVERETT, WA 98204 PHONE: (425)263-4024 Planning NOTES A SEPARATE RIGHT—OF—WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ALL WORK WITHIN THE CITY RIGHT—OF—WAY. RIGHT—OF—WAY PERMIT APPLICATION WITH CONTRACTOR'S SIGNATURE SHALL BE PROVIDED TO THE CITY PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CIVIL CONSTRUCTION PLANS. LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT 4 OF SURVEY FOR LEFEVRE AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 13 OF SURVEYS, PAGE 244, UNDER RECORDING NO. 8103195019, RECORDS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON. SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH, STATE OF WASHINGTON. GRADING QUANTITIES: CUT: 225 CY FILL: 225 CY N ET: 0 CY I I --------- --- ---j� i 1 I I -------- 9+5 ---- I I I --------------_�/ 1724 W. Marine View Drive, Suite 140; Everett, Washington 98201 Office:425.486.6533 Fax: 425.486.6593 www.sdaengineers.com nn�"1-2T1..1 \A/A V 01A/ 7j J 0- H I I I I I I I I I I / I \ — —�—� \� ---- I I I I I L-------------� I I I I I i I — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — T — — — — — — L — — — — — — — — — — I I I � SHEET LIST INDEX SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE C1.0 TITLE SHEET C1.1 GENERAL NOTES C2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS C3.0 TESC PLAN C3.1 TESC DETAILS C4.0 SITE PLAN C4.1 ROAD PROFILES C5.0 GRADING & UTILITY PLAN C5.1 DRAINAGE DETAILS N 30 0 30 60 1 "=30' Scale Feet APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDMONDS DATE: � m T m � m �T1 W -0� ( T C Y > (p CU" � N N C �j - Q a� a a) M Q p Y p Y U Y Q o p M T O v M z C o o � I d a O N 00 4: w a- � v' a z 0 N 0 0 0) c C: N ° 3 V' Vrn/ Vim/ C: 0 w co } C LU 01 = c o U •L- 00 00 0- C/) LO N v a 3 a� co > a� �0 C, 00 3 � N O p z J Ca CV M NCD W 00 W �°' arc p cn Q M Cn J w 6 W o = ¢ 0 0 U W m rn 3: z o J U W i U W z Q J z Y z W w w W J Cl 00 Know what's below. Call before you dig. CITY ENGINEERING DIVISION R:\Projects\186 (echelbarger)\003-17 (jenkins lane)\Dwg\sheets\Edmonds\JL—tl01.dwg 34x22 Packet Pg. 96 GENERAL NOTES: 2.2.a NE 1/4, SW 1/4, SEC. 25, T.27N., R.M., W.M. D O Q Cn 1. ALL MATERIALS AND WORK SHOWN ON THESE PLANS SHALL CONFORM TO THE CITY OF EDMONDS STANDARD PLANS AND DETAILS, THE FOLLOWING SPECIFICATIONS AND CODES, AND ALL OTHER APPLICABLE LOCAL MUNICIPAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL CODES, RULES AND REGULATIONS: - CURRENT INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE (IBC) - 2016 WSDOT/APWA STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROAD, BRIDGE AND MUNICIPAL CONSTRUCTION - WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY STORMWATER MANAGEMENT MANUAL FOR THE PUGET SOUND BASIN (2005 EDITION) 2. STANDARD PLAN AND TYPE NUMBERS INDICATED ON THESE DRAWINGS REFER TO CITY OF EDMONDS STANDARD DETAILS, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE 3. A COPY OF THESE APPROVED PLANS MUST BE ON THE JOBSITE WHENEVER CONSTRUCTION IS IN PROGRESS. 4. DEVIATIONS FROM THESE PLANS MUST BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD AND THE LOCAL GOVERNING AUTHORITY. 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL RECORD ALL APPROVED DEVIATIONS FROM THESE PLANS ON A SET OF "AS -BUILT" DRAWINGS AND SHALL SUMMARIZE ALL AS - BUILT CONDITIONS ON ONE SET OF REPRODUCIBLE DRAWINGS FOR SUBMITTAL TO THE OWNER PRIOR PROJECT COMPLETION AND ACCEPTANCE. A SET OF AS- BUILT DRAWINGS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY OF EDMONDS PRIOR TO FINAL APPROVAL OF THE BUILDING OCCUPANCY/FINAL PROJECT APPROVAL. 6. ELEVATIONS SHOWN ARE IN FEET. SEE SURVEY FOR BENCHMARK INFORMATION. 7. THE LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND SITE FEATURES SHOWN HEREON HAVE BEEN FURNISHED BY OTHERS BY FIELD SURVEY OR OBTAINED FROM AVAILABLE RECORDS AND SHOULD THEREFORE BE CONSIDERED APPROXIMATE ONLY AND NOT NECESSARILY COMPLETE. IT IS THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO INDEPENDENTLY VERIFY THE ACCURACY OF ALL UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN AND TO FURTHER DISCOVER AND PROTECT ANY OTHER UTILITIES NOT SHOWN HEREON WHICH MAY BE AFFECTED BY THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THIS PLAN. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATION, DEPTH, SIZE, TYPE AND CONDITION OF EXISTING UTILITY LINES AT CONNECTION OR CROSSING POINTS BEFORE TRENCHING FOR NEW UTILITIES. ENGINEER ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE COMPLETENESS OR ACCURACY OF THE EXISTING UTILITIES AND SITE FEATURES PRESENTED ON THESE DRAWINGS. ENGINEER SHALL BE NOTIFIED IMMEDIATELY OF CONFLICTS THAT ARISE. 8. CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE AND PROTECT ALL UTILITIES DURING CONSTRUCTION AND SHALL CONTACT THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES LOCATION SERVICE (1-800-424-5555) AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 9. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL CONDITIONS AND DIMENSIONS AT THE PROJECT SITE BEFORE STARTING WORK AND SHALL NOTIFY OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE OF ANY DISCREPANCIES. 10. PIPE LENGTHS WHERE SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE AND MAY CHANGE DUE TO FIELD CONDITIONS. 11. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN A COPY OF THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT (WHERE APPLICABLE) AND SHALL THOROUGHLY FAMILIARIZE HIMSELF WITH THE CONTENTS THEREOF. ALL SITE WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN STRICT COMPLIANCE WITH THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THIS REPORT. 12. STRUCTURAL FILL MATERIAL AND PLACEMENT SHALL CONFORM TO THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE PROJECT GEOTECHNICAL REPORT. 13. MANHOLES, CATCH BASINS, UTILITIES AND PAVEMENT SHALL BEAR ON MEDIUM DENSE TO VERY DENSE NATIVE SOIL OR COMPACTED STRUCTURAL FILL. IF SOIL IS DISTURBED, SOFT, LOOSE, WET OR IF ORGANIC MATERIAL IS PRESENT AT SUBGRADE ELEVATION, REMOVE AND REPLACE WITH COMPACTED STRUCTURAL FILL PER GEOTECHNICAL REPORT. 14. SEE SURVEY AND ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR DIMENSIONS AND LOCATIONS OF BUILDINGS, LANDSCAPED AREAS AND OTHER PROPOSED OR EXISTING SITE FEATURES. 15. SEE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR PERIMETER FOUNDATION DRAINS. FOUNDATION DRAINS SHALL BE INDEPENDENT OF OTHER SITE DRAIN LINES AND SHALL BE TIGHTLINED TO THE STORM DRAIN SYSTEM WHERE INDICATED ON THE PLANS. 19. AS A MINIMUM REQUIREMENT, ALL DISTURBED AREAS ON AND OFF SITE SHALL BE RETURNED TO THE EQUIVALENT OF THEIR PRECONSTRUCTION CONDITION IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPROPRIATE REQUIREMENTS AND z o STANDARDS. O I I a m I I j I I N 20. ALL DISTURBED SOIL AREAS SHALL BE SEEDED OR STABILIZED BY OTHER oWc I I o ACCEPTABLE METHODS FOR THE PREVENTION OF ON -SITE EROSION AFTER THE COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION. SEE EROSION CONTROL PLANS FOR SPECIFIC GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL REQUIREMENTS. 21. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP OFF -SITE STREETS CLEAN AT ALL TIMES I I I o BY SWEEPING. WASHING OF THESE STREETS WILL NOT BE ALLOWED WITHOUT I I I z PRIOR APPROVAL. � � 22. THIS PROJECT IS NOT A BALANCED EARTHWORK PROJECT. BOTH EXPORT m m T m m a T AND IMPORT OF SOIL AND ROCK MATERIALS ARE REQUIRED. rn ° o m N N 0 I rn +� co 23. SLOPE OF FINISHED GRADE SHALL BE CONSTANT BETWEEN FINISHED a o Y o Y U Y ¢ o 0 CONTOURS OR SPOT ELEVATIONS SHOWN. m T O 24. FINISHED GRADE SHALL SLOPE AWAY FROM BUILDING WALLS AT MINIMUM in o z 5% SLOPE FOR A MINIMUM DISTANCE OF 10 FEET.rN a� _ > 00 a` 25. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR AND SHALL INSTALL AND MAINTAIN SHORING AND BRACING AS NECESSARY TO PROTECT WORKERS, _ EXISTING BUILDINGS, STREETS, WALKWAYS, UTILITIES AND OTHER EXISTING AND PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS AND EXCAVATIONS AGAINST LOSS OF GROUND �w a - OR CAVING EMBANKMENTS. CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR w a REMOVAL OF SHORING AND BRACING, AS REQUIRED. 26. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN APPROVAL FROM THE CITY AND FOLLOW CITY PROCEDURES FOR ALL WATER SERVICE INTERRUPTIONS, HYDRANT SHUTOFFS, STREET CLOSURES OR OTHER ACCESS RESTRICTIONS. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT RELOCATE OR ELIMINATE ANY HYDRANTS WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM THE FIRE MARSHAL. o � E Q, 0 27. COORDINATE AND ARRANGE FOR ALL UTILITY CONNECTIONS, UTILITY o RELOCATIONS AND/OR SERVICE INTERRUPTIONS WITH THE AFFECTED OWNERS 0 c AND APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES. CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING UTILITIES H SHALL BE MADE ONLY WITH ADVANCE WRITTEN APPROVAL OF THE 3 AUTHORITIES GOVERNING SAID UTILITIES. N ^t } 28. EXISTING UTILITY LINES IN SERVICE WHICH ARE DAMAGED DUE TO C: w CONSTRUCTION WORK SHALL BE REPAIRED AT CONTRACTORS EXPENSE AND INSPECTED AND ACCEPTED BY CITY OF EDMONDS AND OWNERS v c a REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO BACKFILLING. - N c 10 > 0 5 00 U LO 29. NEW UTILITY LOCATIONS ARE GENERALLY SHOWN BY DIMENSION, WHERE v NO DIMENSIONS ARE INDICATED, LOCATIONS MAY BE SCALED FROM DRAWINGS. 0 a FIELD ADJUSTMENTS SHALL BE APPROVED BY OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE AND 3 CITY. > M LO 30. WHERE NEW PIPE CLEARS AN EXISTING OR NEW UTILITY BY 6" OR LESS, c 'O 00 PLACE POLYETHYLENE PLASTIC FOAM AS A CUSHION BETWEEN THE UTILITIES. LO 04 31. SEE MECHANICAL DRAWINGS (WHERE APPLICABLE) FOR CONTINUATION OF N 0 SITE UTILITIES WITHIN THE BUILDING. O 32. SEE ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS (WHERE APPLICABLE) FOR EXTERIOR ELECTRICAL WORK. 33. SEE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS (WHERE APPLICABLE) FOR SITE IRRIGATION SYSTEM. 0 z J Ca CV O U m o cn ¢ W W = O ¢ o CO rn W r Z I = o Z I W -�t J I 16. ALL REQUIRED STORMWATER FACILITIES MUST BE CONSTRUCTED AND IN OPERATION PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY PAVEMENT UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. uj 17. ALL ROOF DRAINS, PERIMETER FOUNDATION DRAINS, CATCH BASINS AND W OTHER EXTERNAL DRAINS SHALL BE CONNECTED TO THE STORM DRAINAGE a SYSTEM, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. O 18. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN AND PAY FOR ALL PERMITS REQUIRED FOR Z INSTALLATION OF ALL SITE IMPROVEMENTS INDICATED ON THESE DRAWINGS. W J Z Q W Z z W W a APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDMONDS DATE: C i's 1 X W O ac m J W m U W 0 0 O H U M c 0 U Know what's below. Call before you dig. m_ CITY ENGINEERING DIVISION R:\Projects\186 (echelbarger)\003-17 (jenkins lane)\Dwg\sheets\Edmonds\JL-gn01.dwg 34x22 Packet Pg. 97 2.2.a U Y m N U Cn W U J Q 0 N 00 i 0 N 0 Q Cn ----------------I NE 1/4, SW 1/4, SEC. 25, T.27N., R.M., W.M. \ i\ \ o I I I � I � w I o I � I m I0 I / I CB RIM=274.06 w IE 12" RCP(E)=271.86 � � I \ \ Z I \__;�-------- SD W I I J I 28o_ _ _ 13TH WAY W W -------- �1 V ) o\ --- �� — — N 810 8°22'26" W 319l8'� � _ _ � 24" 12" 226.75' 18 P P " 24" P 18»P 22" 18 P 22— 18"P 2424 P 20"P 18" 24 P— P �12" P P P L p —� 20" N 88°2 '26' W 177.01 ' \ L L ! �' P _ _ _ I W I I / T CB RIM=268.11 W ' IE 12" RCP(E)=265.96 0 18 P12» 10" \ AP 12 14 \ 1 I I P I A ----------------- \ / --//�� ��J 0 I 1 I�� P � P01 CN � 18" I 12 AP�\\ /� APO SSCO RIM=280.37 WC J /� CB RIM=279.91 // rn SS ESMT / I IE 8" CMP(S)=278.06 / d AFN77021 025� IE 4" CPP(E)=278.36 / \ 36SW --------- 30' P � �\----------------- / SS T- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - -SSM—SS - — J _ 74.93 CTR.HCHAN.28" PVC (E& I)=268.23 l l l d �lll I -L---------- --- ------J N N Q 4 / 43 � d 4 � Q Q ^�\ I a LIJ \ /—LL /LC1 4 16"E P � I \10" 22" F _ — _ _ F 18 P 30 12» �/\\ P a __ x P14 F 30" d — _ _ x = X I x I � N 88°22x'26" W 173.86' —rX Xx —----- --------,----__ I -------------------------------I------- 3� —2 8 Know what's below. Call before you dig. 20 0 20 40 1 "=20' Scale Feet APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDMONDS DATE: iXW CITY ENGINEERING DIVISION z o I I Lu o c N U I I I I I I o z m m O O T c c Vl O Y G> > 0 �p CL Q Q L p Y d p Y t U Y p� Q o f0 p T O M z � C O V ` I � L .O O ap ``d / T IL a- 0 Z V O N 0co. O c O N L 0) E N a) 3 E N rn } C 0) N a) 0 W C M } w U •E W) .o 'p p � 00 U /) LO LO 3 NR 10 00 0 r O a Z Q J a N O � * CD rn 0 ai W Ix = p O Q 00 6 CO w r Z I = o Z I I W --t J I Cn W Z Z 0 Q ~ J � Z (n O Z v �C z Z � W N w C2*0 W W O o: Q m J W 2 U W p p O H m c 0 U 00 N 0 0 0 N z J a c =a 0 J d LL d c m J c c a� N c a� t v Q 3 0 a aD m r z x C as s 0 0 .r Q R:\Projects\186 (echelbarger)\003-17 (jenkins lane)\Dwg\sheets\Edmonds\JL-ex01.dwg 34x22 Packet Pg. 98 2.2.a U Y T m Cn J Q 0 N 00 i 0 N 0 Q 8 I I I I I I TEMPORARY SEDIM NE 1/4, SW 1/4, SEC. 25, T.27N., R.M., W.M. 1 I I I I I � I I I II I / I / CB RIM=274.06 I IE 12" RCP(E)=271.86 co SD-�--Z \ \ _ 13TH WAY SW w 1 5Xo,_ % 1 / I XE'Du _X X X X �— I I I I I REMOVE EXISTING BUILDINGS & HARDSCAPE (TYP) I I v2 \\ N N 14 V I I I I—W I I 6 RIM=268.11 W IE 12" RCP(E)=265.96 i —SD—� I � LEGEND i m D D D STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE XXX PROPOSED MAJOR CONTOUR c a xxx PROPOSED MINOR CONTOUR N I I I I j I I 0 o EXISTING CONTOUR — — PROPERTY LINE — — — — — — — — — — CLEARING/GRADING LIMITS IIIz° SILT FENCE T 13 ORANGE PROTECTIVE BARRIER FENCING T T m O N O I X X X X X X X EX. STRUCTURE TO BE REMOVED Q p Y p Y U Y Q a) p C PROPOSED STORM CONVEYANCE T O. ❑ CATCH BASIN INLET PROTECTION fn U `n M o z L) N I d 0* TREES TO REMAIN 0 to 00 xTREE TO BE REMOVED �\ --- //i I I STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE PER C.O.E. STD. DTL. G1.2 INSTALL OVER EXISTING DRIVEWAY 70 LF LENGTH (MIN) I I I 730"P —� c REMOVE EXISTING LANDSCAPE FEATURES (TYP) REMOVE EXISTING DRIVEWAY INTERCEPTOR SWALE FILTER FABRIC FENCE (TYP) PER C.O.E. STD. DTL. E1.1 JSS — I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I I — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — I I i NOTE INSTALL AND MAINTAIN ALL TESC MEASURES ACCORDING TO APPROVED PLANS, CITY OF EDMONDS STANDARD DETAILS, AND ALL OTHER MEASURES THAT MAY BE REQUIRED DURING CONSTRUCTION. Know what's below. Call before you dig. N 20 0 20 40 1 "=20' Scale Feet APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDMONDS DATE: m- O 00 a O C � 3 a� C LL C Lu U .O C .5 U E N 0 N C 3 v N N 0 z CD J N m N W 00 O m Q m W W = O a 0) � CO 0) W Z r I = C z I I W -�t J I Y z W 0 U N a� c a� a 70 N eM 01 N 10 00 L0 CV LL- eM eM N 10 00 LO CV v ai U u Z Q J a. V W W C3,90 X W 0 Q m J W U W 0 0 O H 00 N O O 0 N z J a C .y �a 0 J d LL d C m J to C C N c a� s V O Q s 3 0 IZ d m T x W r C O E s fC a CITY ENGINEERING DIVISION R:\Projects\186 (echelbarger)\003-17 (jenkins lane)\Dwg\sheets\Edmonds\JL—er01.dwg 34x22 Packet Pg. 99 SITE GRADING AND T.E.S.C. NOTES NE 1/4, SW 1/4, SEC. 25, T.27N., R.M., W.M. BMP T5.13 i 0 2.2.a 0 Q 1n 1. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE EROSION CONTROL REQUIREMENTS, (UDC CHAPTER 30.63ASCC), WATER QUALITY REQUIREMENTS, (SECTION 7.53 SCC) AND CLEARING LIMITS VIOLATIONS MAY RESULT IN REVOCATION OF PROJECT PERMITS, PLAN APPROVAL AND BOND FORECLOSURES. 2. PRIOR TO ANY SITE CONSTRUCTION TO INCLUDE CLEARING/LOGGING OR GRADING THE SITE/LOT CLEARING LIMITS SHALL BE LOCATED AND FIELD IDENTIFIED BY THE PROJECT SURVEYOR AS REQUIRED BY THESE PLANS. THE PROJECT SURVEYOR'S NAME AND TELEPHONE NUMBER ARE: DARREN RIDDLE PHONE: (425) 512-7099. 3. THE DEVELOPER/PROJECT ENGINEER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WATER QUALITY AS DETERMINED BY THE MONITORING PROGRAM, ESTABLISHED BY THE PROJECT ENGINEER. THE PROJECT ENGINEER'S NAME AND PHONE NUMBER ARE KEN MCINTYRE, P.E., (425) 486-6533, 24 RAPID RESPONSE WATER QUALITY CONTACT IS CLINT LUCAS, (425) 821-3400. 4. THE TEMPORARY EROSION/SEDIMENTATION CONTROL FACILITIES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED PRIOR TO ANY GRADING OR EXTENSIVE LAND CLEARING IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROVED TEMPORARY EROSION/SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PLAN. THESE FACILITIES MUST BE SATISFACTORILY MAINTAINED UNTIL CONSTRUCTION AND LANDSCAPING IS COMPLETED AND THE POTENTIAL FOR ON -SITE EROSION HAS PASSED. 5. ALL SITE WORK MUST COMPLY TO UDC CHAPTER 30.63A SCC AND CHAPTER 33 OF THE INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE (LATEST EDITION). 6. ALL EARTH WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH COUNTY STANDARDS. PRE -CONSTRUCTION SOILS INVESTIGATION MAY BE REQUIRED TO EVALUATE SOILS STABILITY. 7. IF CUT AND FILL SLOPES EXCEED A MAXIMUM OF TWO FEET HORIZONTAL TO ONE FOOT VERTICAL, A ROCK OR CONCRETE RETAINING WALL MAY BE REQUIRED. ALL ROCK RETAINING WALLS GREATER THAN FOUR (4) FEET IN HEIGHT ARE TO FOLLOW COUNTY SPECIFICATIONS AND TO BE DESIGNED AND CERTIFIED BY A CIVIL ENGINEER WITH EXPERIENCE IN SOILS MECHANICS. FENCE TO BE PROVIDED FOR ALL WALLS GREATER THAN 30" IN HEIGHT. 8. STOCKPILES ARE TO BE LOCATED IN SAFE AREAS AND ADEQUATELY PROTECTED BY TEMPORARY SEEDING OF A PERENNIAL GROUND COVER GRASS. HYDROSEED IS PREFERRED. STOCKPILES SHALL STABILIZED WITHIN 24 HOURS OF FORMATION. 9. ALL STRUCTURAL FILL SHALL BE COMPACTED TO A MINIMUM OF 95% OF MAXIMUM DENSITY BY MODIFIED PROCTOR TEST IN 10" (MAX) LIFTS. ALL TESTS SHALL BE SENT TO SNOHOMISH COUNTY. PROVIDE COPY WITH AS -BUILT PLANS. 10. T.E.S.C. MEASURES SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO ANY SITE WORK (SEE ATTACHED PLAN). 11. THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROVED PLAN (SEE ATTACHED). APPROVAL BY THE COUNTY GRADING INSPECTOR FOR INSTALLING DRAINAGE SYSTEM PRIOR TO FRAMING INSPECTION ON HOUSE. 12. THE SURFACE OF ALL SLOPES SHALL BE COMPACTED. THIS MAY BE ACCOMPLISHED BY OVER -BUILDING THE SLOPES, THEN CUTTING BACK TO FINAL GRADES, OR BY RUNNING THE COMPACTOR OVER THE SLOPE AS EACH LIFT IS BEING PLACED. ALL SLOPES SHALL BE COMPACTED BY THE END OF EACH WORK DAY. 13. SILTS FROM DETENTION FACILITIES ARE TO BE CLEANED TO DESIGN VAULT BOTTOM ELEVATION PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACCEPTANCE. 14. SEEDING SPECIFICATIONS - GRASS SEED SHALL BE LOW -GROWING MIX (IE. BARCLAYS LOW -GROWING MIX). FERTILIZER SHALL BE APPLIED AT THE RATE OF 400 LBS PER ACRE OF 10-20-10 OR EQUIVALENT. 15. ALL EXPOSED AND UNWORKED SOILS SHALL BE STABILIZED BY SUITABLE APPLICATION OF BMP'S. FROM MAY 1 TO SEPTEMBER 30 NO SOILS SHALL REMAIN UNSTABILIZED FOR MORE THAN 7 DAYS IF PERMITTED. FROM OCTOBER 1 TO APRIL 30, NO SOIL MAY REMAIN EXPOSED FOR MORE THAN 2 DAYS. THE SITE, STORM WATER RUNOFF SHALL PASS THROUGH A SEDIMENT POND OR SEDIMENT TRAP, OR OTHER APPROPRIATE BMP'S. DENUDED AREAS SHALL BE COVERED BY MULCH, SOD, PLASTIC, OR OTHER BMP AS NEEDED; SOIL STOCKPILES SHALL BE STABILIZED OR PROTECTED WITH SEDIMENT RETENTION BMP'S WITHIN 24 HOURS OF FORMATION. GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE TIMED AND CONDUCTED IN STAGES TO MINIMIZE SOIL EXPOSURE. 16. EROSION CONTROL MATERIALS SHALL BE STORED IN STOCKPILES ON SITE PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. PROVIDE 24 HOUR COVER. 17. BEFORE CONSTRUCTION ACCEPTANCE BY THE COUNTY, THE APPLICANT SHALL ESTABLISH A PERMANENT VEGETATIVE GROUND COVER. TO CONTROL SOIL EROSION, ALL AREAS OF LAND DISTURBANCE NOT OTHERWISE PERMANENTLY STABILIZED BY IMPERVIOUS SURFACES OR OTHER MEANS SHALL HAVE A PERMANENT VEGETATIVE COVER. 18. ALL TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE REMOVED WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER FINAL SITE STABILIZATION IS ACHIEVED OR AFTER THE TEMPORARY BMPS ARE NO LONGER NEEDED. TRAPPED SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED OR STABILIZED ON SITE. DISTURBED SOIL AREAS RESULTING FROM REMOVAL SHALL BE PERMANENTLY STABILIZED. 19. STRUCTURAL BACKFILL SHALL MEET THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS OF WSDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS SECTION 9-03.14. MONITORING PROGRAM INSPECTIONS SHOULD BE MADE WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER LARGE STORM EVENTS. SEDIMENT SHOULD BE REMOVED WHEN IT FILLS ONE HALF OF THE POND'S TOTAL SEDIMENT STORAGE AREA. THE EFFECTIVENESS OF A SEDIMENT POND IS BASED LESS ON ITS SIZE THAN ON REGULAR SEDIMENT REMOVAL. ALL TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES SHALL BE MAINTAINED AND REPAIRED AS NEEDED TO ASSURE CONTINUED PERFORMANCE OF THEIR INTENDED FUNCTION. ALL MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR SHALL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH AN APPROVED MANUAL. ALL TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE REMOVED WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER FINAL SITE STABILIZATION IS ACHIEVED OR AFTER THE TEMPORARY BMP'S ARE NO LONGER NEEDED. TRAPPED SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED OR STABILIZED ON SITE. DISTURBED SOIL AREAS RESULTING FROM REMOVAL SHALL BE PERMANENTLY STABILIZED. DESIGN GUIDELINES • SOIL RETENTION. THE DUFF LAYER AND NATIVE TOPSOIL SHOULD BE RETAINED IN AN UNDISTURBED STATE TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PRACTICABLE. IN ANY AREAS REQUIRING GRADING REMOVE AND STOCKPILE THE DUFF LAYER AND TOPSOIL ON SITE IN A DESIGNATED, CONTROLLED AREA, NOT ADJACENT TO PUBLIC RESOURCES AND CRITICAL AREAS, TO BE REAPPLIED TO OTHER PORTIONS OF THE SITE WHERE FEASIBLE. • SOIL QUALITY. ALL AREAS SUBJECT TO CLEARING AND GRADING THAT HAVE NOT BEEN COVERED BY IMPERVIOUS SURFACE, INCORPORATED INTO A DRAINAGE FACILITY OR ENGINEERED AS STRUCTURAL FILL OR SLOPE SHALL, AT PROJECT COMPLETION, DEMONSTRATE THE FOLLOWING: A TOPSOIL LAYER WITH A MINIMUM ORGANIC MATTER CONTENT OF TEN PERCENT DRY WEIGHT IN PLANTING BEDS, AND 5% ORGANIC MATTER CONTENT (BASED ON A LOSS -ON -IGNITION TEST) IN TURF AREAS, AND A PH FROM 6.0 TO 8.0 OR MATCHING THE PH OF THE ORIGINAL UNDISTURBED SOIL. THE TOPSOIL LAYER SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM DEPTH OF EIGHT INCHES EXCEPT WHERE TREE ROOTS LIMIT THE DEPTH OF INCORPORATION OF AMENDMENTS NEEDED TO MEET THE CRITERIA. SUBSOILS BELOW THE TOPSOIL LAYER SHOULD BE SCARIFIED AT LEAST 4 INCHES WITH SOME INCORPORATION OF THE UPPER MATERIAL TO AVOID STRATIFIED LAYERS, WHERE FEASIBLE. 2. PLANTING BEDS MUST BE MULCHED WITH 2 INCHES OF ORGANIC MATERIAL 3. QUALITY OF COMPOST AND OTHER MATERIALS USED TO MEET THE ORGANIC CONTENT REQUIREMENTS: A. THE ORGANIC CONTENT FOR -PRE-APPROVEDO AMENDMENT RATES CAN BE MET ONLY USING COMPOST THAT MEETS THE DEFINITION OF -COMPOSTED MATERIALS IN WAC 173-350-220. THIS CODE IS AVAILABLE ONLINE AT: HTTP://WWW. ECY. WA. GOV/P R OG RAM S/SW FA/FACILITIES/350. HTM L. COMPOST USED IN BIORETENTION AREAS SHOULD BE STABLE, MATURE AND DERIVED FROM YARD DEBRIS, WOOD WASTE, OR OTHER ORGANIC MATERIALS THAT MEET THE INTENT OF THE ORGANIC SOIL AMENDMENT SPECIFICATION. BIOSOLIDS AND MANURE COMPOSTS CAN BE HIGHER IN BIO-AVAILABLE PHOSPHORUS THAN COMPOST DERIVED FROM YARD OR PLANT WASTE AND THEREFORE ARE NOT ALLOWED IN BIORETENTION AREAS DUE TO THE POSSIBILITY OF EXPORTING BIO-AVAILABLE PHOSPHORUS IN EFFLUENT. THE COMPOST MUST ALSO HAVE AN ORGANIC MATTER CONTENT OF 35% TO 65%, AND A CARBON TO NITROGEN RATIO BELOW 25:1. THE CARBON TO NITROGEN RATIO MAY BE AS HIGH AS 35:1 FOR PLANTINGS COMPOSED ENTIRELY OF PLANTS NATIVE TO THE PUGET SOUND LOWLANDS REGION. B. CALCULATED AMENDMENT RATES MAY BE MET THROUGH USE OF COMPOSTED MATERIALS AS DEFINED ABOVE; OR OTHER ORGANIC MATERIALS AMENDED TO MEET THE CARBON TO NITROGEN RATIO REQUIREMENTS, AND MEETING THE CONTAMINANT STANDARDS OF GRADE A COMPOST. THE RESULTING SOIL SHOULD BE CONDUCIVE TO THE TYPE OF VEGETATION TO BE ESTABLISHED. • IMPLEMENTATION OPTIONS: THE SOIL QUALITY DESIGN GUIDELINES LISTED ABOVE CAN BE MET BY USING ONE OF THE METHODS LISTED BELOW. 1. LEAVE UNDISTURBED NATIVE VEGETATION AND SOIL, AND PROTECT FROM COMPACTION DURING CONSTRUCTION. 2. AMEND DISTURBED SOIL ACCORDING TO THE FOLLOWING PROCEDURES: b. SCARIFY SUBSOIL TO A DEPTH OF ONE FOOT. c. IN PLANTING BEDS, PLACE THREE INCHES OF COMPOST AND TILL IN TO AN EIGHT -INCH DEPTH. d. IN TURF AREAS, PLACE TWO INCHES OF COMPOST AND TILL IN TO AN EIGHT -INCH DEPTH. e. APPLY TWO TO FOUR INCHES OF ARBORIST WOOD CHIP, COARSE BARK MULCH, OR COMPOST MULCH TO PLANTING BEDS AFTER FINAL PLANTING. ALTERNATIVELY, DISTURBED SOIL CAN BE AMENDED ON A SITE -CUSTOMIZED MANNER SO THAT IT MEETS THE SOIL QUALITY CRITERIA SET FORTH ABOVE, AS DETERMINED BY A LICENSED ENGINEER, GEOLOGIST, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, OR OTHER PERSON AS APPROVED BY SNOHOMISH COUNTY. 3. 3.STOCKPILE EXISTING TOPSOIL DURING GRADING, AND REPLACE IT PRIOR TO PLANTING. STOCKPILED TOPSOIL MUST BE AMENDED IF NEEDED TO MEET THE ORGANIC MATTER AND DEPTH REQUIREMENTS BY FOLLOWING THE PROCEDURES IN METHOD (2) ABOVE). 4. IMPORT TOPSOIL MIX OF SUFFICIENT ORGANIC CONTENT AND DEPTH TO MEET THE ORGANIC MATTER AND DEPTH REQUIREMENTS. MORE THAN ONE METHOD MAY BE USED ON DIFFERENT PORTIONS OF THE SAME SITE. SOIL THAT ALREADY MEETS THE DEPTH AND ORGANIC MATTER QUALITY STANDARDS, AND IS NOT COMPACTED, DOES NOT NEED TO BE AMENDED. MAINTENANCE • SOIL QUALITY AND DEPTH SHOULD BE ESTABLISHED TOWARD THE END OF CONSTRUCTION AND ONCE ESTABLISHED, SHOULD BE PROTECTED FROM COMPACTION, SUCH AS FROM LARGE MACHINERY USE, AND FROM EROSION. • SOIL SHOULD BE PLANTED AND MULCHED AFTER INSTALLATION. • PLANT DEBRIS OR ITS EQUIVALENT SHOULD BE LEFT ON THE SOIL SURFACE TO REPLENISH ORGANIC MATTER. CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE 1. SCHEDULE A PRE -CONSTRUCTION MEETING WITH CITY ENGINEERING DIVISION AT 425-771-0220, EXT. 1326. TWO DAY (48 HR) NOTICE IS REQUIRED. 2. REVIEW TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES. 3. CALL FOR UTILITY LOCATES. 4. INSTALL TESC MEASURES AND MAINTAIN DUST CONTROL WHILE PREVENTING DISTURBANCE OF ANY AREAS OF VEGETATION THE CONSTRUCTION ZONE. 5. HAVE EROSION CONTROL MEASURES INSPECTED BY CITY OF EDMONDS CITY ENGINEERING INSPECTOR. ALL TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION AND EROSION CONTROL MEASURES MUST BE IN PLACE AND INSPECTED PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION OR SITE CLEARING. EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PRACTICES AND/OR DEVICES SHALL BE MAINTAINED UNTIL PERMANENT VEGETATION IS ESTABLISHED. 6. DEMOLISH EXISTING STRUCTURES 7. ROUGH GRADE SITE AS REQUIRED TO INSTALL DRAINAGE FEATURES. 8. CLEAR, GRUB & ROUGH GRADE SITE. REVEGETATE DISTURBED AREAS NOT SUBJECT TO ADDITIONAL SURFACE DISTURBANCE IMMEDIATELY AFTER ROUGH GRADING. (OTHER EXPOSED AREAS SHALL BE STABILIZED PER EROSION CONTROL NOTES BELOW) 9. INSTALL UTILITIES AND OTHER SITE IMPROVEMENTS, INCLUDING FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS. 13. STABILIZE AND COMPOST AMEND ALL EXPOSED SOILS PRIOR TO REVEGETATION OF ENTIRE SITE. 14. ESTABLISH LANDSCAPING AND PERMANENT VEGETATION. ALL TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE REMOVED UPON FINAL SITE STABILIZATION AND APPROVAL BY CITY INSPECTOR. FILTER FABRIC -_ SECURED TO 2" X 2" 14 GA. WIRE FABRIC \ EQUAL 2" X 2" WOOD OR EQUIVALENT cu �- 1=1II-1I1=1III i-II " -ITI- 8 - 12 =1 1.El I I -I 11=1 I -III-1 I I -III-' 1=_ 25' MIN, RADIUS -III_II: QUARRY SPALLS 2-4" MIN DIA 8"-12" MIN. DEPTH 8" FILTER FABRIC MATERIAL IN PLACE 3/4"-1,5" WASHED GRAVEL IN C❑NTIN❑US ROLLS, USE STAPLES THE TRENCH AND ON BOTH SIDES OF OR WIRE RINGS TO ATTACH FILTER FABRIC FENCE ON THE SURFACE. FABRIC TO WIRE. T so1oo. I MESH SUPPORT FEN�E VWIRE UPPORT FILTER FA�I�IC, I -Ili-, FAo��c1j� tip' . III Ill illll I III II' �lllll llli. 11111 I Tlllll�llllllllllllllillll �- P��TS / rOl�F! JTO _---- N t Z BURY BOTTOM OF FILTER rt MATERIAL 8" TO 12" 6' MAX. PR❑VIDE FULL WIDTH OF INGRESS/ EGRESS AREA Li 2" X 2" WOOD POSTS OR CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN TEMPORARY C❑NSTRUCTI❑N ENTRANCE EQUIVALENT DURING THE C❑NSTRUCTI❑N PERI❑D. CONTRACTOR/DEVELOPER SHALL MAINTAIN AND REPLACE STRAW BALES TO INSURE PROPER ER❑SI❑N CONTROL. CITY INSPECTI❑N REQUIRED ON ALL ER❑SI❑N CONTROL CITY INSPECTI❑N REQUIRED ON ALL MEASURES BEFORE WORK CAN BEGIN. ER❑SI❑N CONTROL METHODS BEFORE OTHER WORK CAN BEGIN. -,wr- O I TY . OF EDMONDS. -CITY, OF: EDMO Q0 REVISIONS STANDARD DETAIL_ REVISIONS STANDARD DETAIL. APPROVED BY DATE APPROVED BY DATE D. GEBERT 10/6/03 �yy�� STABILMCONSTRUC110NENIRM FILTER FABBICFENCE FLTRATIONSY5IEYS �890-19g� %8g 99 0-1 DATE 7/24/Ol SCALE NTS DWG No. E12 DATE 7/24/01 SCALE NTS DWG N0. E1.1 ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE N.T.S. R 2' MIN. 1 EXISTING 2 FILL GRADE 2 CUT 1� s GRADING SETBACK TO P/L N.T.S. 2 SILT FENCE DETAIL N.T.S. GRATE CITY INSPECTI❑N REQUIRED ON ALL ER❑SI❑N C❑NTR❑L MEASURES BEFORE WORK CAN BEGIN. ........... . ..0ITY 0F EOMOf�JDO REVISIONS STANDARD DETAIL_ q D. GEO E 06DATTEMPORARY SEDIMENT TRAP FOR CATCH BASINS D. GEBERT 10/06/03 D. GEBERT 05/19/05 7890-19g0 D. GEBERT 05/05/06 DATE 7/24/01 SCALE NTS DWG NO. E1.3 R. ENGLISH 11/01/13 ON CATCH BASIN INLET PROTECTION DETAIL N.T.S. APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDMONDS DATE: Z o 2, N I I I I o INNO � m T � m C Y > 0 (p M N ¢ m s c a, co Q p Y p Y 0 Y Q o p T I O. L) v M Z � o C o L) I d m •a O N 00 > T a �w a - OD v' a (z M O GV co E 0 (D c � •� � N ° 3 V' Vrn/ Vim/ C: w a } � Lu U C: t 01 �q .0 c U E: •5 1� CL V) LO N CV � •i p X 3 _ eM > L0 10 L- v 00 v, N 3 � N a� O a z CD J CV m U W m � rn 0 cn ¢ W = p F- O Q o 3:CO 0) W - z I = o z I I W -�t J I W Z Q J z Y z W a W in V W W C3. 1 IX W 0 ac m J W 2 U W p p O F- U M z 0 U Know what's below. Call before you dig. m= CITY ENGINEERING DIVISION R:\Projects\186 (echelbarger)\003-17 (jenkins lane)\Dwg\sheets\Edmonds\JL-erdt01.dwg 34x22 Packet Pg. 100 2.2.a U m a� a Cn a J Q 0 N 00 I 0 N 0 Q I I I BEGIN CURB RETURN I STA 10+00 I 3 1.1 00 RT 9+50i — I I II I I I PROPOSED " 10' SS EASEMENT I R/W 15' CONC. VERT. CURB- COE STD DTL E2.10 I i I I i i I I I END CURB RETURN STA 10+25.00 6.00 RT 25' R/W 13 EX. PVMT. a 2% IN VARIES HMA CLASS Y2" PG 64-22 (SEE NOTE 5) 1Y4" MINUS CSBC PER WSDOT 9-03.9(3) (SEE NOTES 3 & 4) IMPORT OR NATIVE MATERIAL BACKFILL SHALL BE COMPACTED TO 95% MAX DENSITY (SEE NOTE 2) FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENT SECTION 13TH WAY SW 1 "=10' NE 1/4, SW 1/4, SEC. 25, T.27N., R.M., W.M. I f0 �o I C j I O I l a r I I. I I I m W Q > I I «� o I I o I I � INTERSECTION I m STA 10+77.12, 13TH WAY NE DRIVWAY STA 210+00.00, ROAD A STA 11 tF52.27 / LO 6.00 RT / w o I I I Illz I � DRIVEWAY I = --1— _STA. 10+76.66 Q I I ANGLE POINT, / 6.00 RT --CURBLINE �/ ) _ STA L6°0 6.00 RT ` I z 00 (D r > o, o Q mmscrn ro Q p Y p Y U Y Q o p 13TH WAY SW 11 +00 N 88°2226" W 319.78 12+00 m 226.15' — — — — 13+00 UM Z \ N U) O V \ I d _ > a` N 88°2226" W 177.0= _ \ 10' DRY UTILITY/ — — \ EASEMENT \ \\ MATCH EXISTING CURB \ STA 12+08.26 \ / / 23.01 RT / � O / SETBACK f 6,360 SF I I I � 0)I I R 20' R/W I o� / I \ / 5' SIDE SETBACK I I F- (TYP) = I I \ / / 15 REAR SETBACK I I +_ I / (TYP) I I I 6,067 SF -----------ram/ I \� EXISTING I I 10' SS EASEMENT \ I I / I PROPOSED I END OF PAVEMENT 10' SS STA 21 +36.04 \ EASEMENT 0.00 RT I / I / I O3 I 6,150 SF I I / I / I \ / I � C N 88°2226" W 173.86'— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — I , — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — -r — — — - — I I I � I R/W 10' 10' 2" MIN AC PAVEMENT 2"—%" CSTC 4"-1Y4" CSBC PAVEMENT COMPACTION — 91 % RICE DENSITY SUBGRADE, BASE, TOP COURSE COMPACTION 95% (ASTM 1557) INTERIOR ROAD SECTION ROAD 'A' 1 "=10' Know what's below. Call before you dig. N 20 0 20 40 1 "=20' Scale Feet APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDMONDS DATE: m- O 00 a 0 c � 3 a� C L> s✓ 0 LL U °E .O a p ? v 3 v N a z CD N m N W 00 0 cn Q W = p O ¢ 0 m � W r z I m:o z I I W -�t J I Y z W 0 U N a� c a� 70 N eM 01 N 10 00 L0 CV LL- eM eM N 10 00 04 v ai U r� u Ill A C490 m W 0 ac Q m J W m U W p p O H U N c 0 U 00 N 0 0 T O N z J a C .y 0 J d LL a� c m J to c Y C N to c V a s 3 0 a m t x W r c a� E s r a CITY ENGINEERING DIVISION R:\Projects\186 (echelbarger)\003-17 (jenkins lane)\Dwg\sheets\Edmonds\JL—s101.dwg 34x22 Packet Pg. 101 NE 1/4, SW 1/4, SEC. 25, T.27N., R.M., W.M. 2.2.a U Y m N W J Q N 66 i 0 N 0 Q 300 290 00 I'7 O 00 N J W 280 270 260 0_: (0 O 00 N J W 0.50% PROPOSED CURB FLOWLINE O O o co + N J Q W N ; \U a a PVI STA 11 +90.00 PVI EL 280.06 40.00' VC K=3' (0 N J W 300 300 290 290 � o a + 0 280 280 N � \ N a \ \ 72 � (nW \Og 270 270 EXISTING GRADE ®SAWCUT LINE 260 260 It O (a O M (D + N 00 N U) W EXISTING GRADE @ROAD � 7PROPOSED GRADE 2.0090 ®ROAD q N � 00 00 00 00 00 00 N N N N N EX. GROUND EL. PROPOSED CURB 21 +40 21 +20 21 +00 AT SAWCUT LINE FLOWLINE EL. 250 250 If) co r,r7 000 -O I`7O n O �O 00 q-O OO O NO O M O - In (0 (0 ro O N rn n r- O (0 I- O O 00 00 00 00 66 00 00 00 a)� o0 o0 (0co r7� CA 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 CO CO 00 00 CO CO 00 CO 00 CO r, r- r,, r- r, r- r, r (0 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 10+00 11+00 12+00 12+80 13TH WAY SW PROFILE EL. AT FG AT ROAD ROAD (0 00 O co co M � O O 00 00 00 00 00 co N N N N N N 20+80 20+60 20+40 ROAD A PROFILE V) ul) 0 A o O N co N W 14- 00 00 N 00 00 N N 20+20 (0 (0 LO LO 00 0000 N N 20+00 Know what's below. Call before you dig. 300 I m I I I I I I I I I I r- Cn I I o. WI I o 290 280 270 260 I I I I I I o Z m T C C rn f/) Y G) > 0 (p CL Q p Y p Y U Y Q o p v � v IM C O Z . I 2 00 r O a` �r I a- uo 9' a z M ti nV r� 0 N 00. 0 c 0 c •� � N ° a� 3 _0 N rn ^ w �} a w U Lo .0 > E 00 O p UCL CLcn LO �i 04 >` p X a 3 > �M 10 10 v � Lri v N r O a Z J � ca N fM (J) * CD W O N ¢ = m W w O Q 00 O U W CO rn " LLIZ I p m o I F- J () W It I U W Z Q W J J LL C/) O x Z a. � Q 5 0 5 10 "= Q 1 5' Vertical Scale Feet Z O 20 0 20 40 "=20' W Ix 1 Horizontal Scale Feet APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDMONDS DATE: BY: C4. 1 R:\Projects\186 (echelbarger)\003-17 (jenkins lane)\Dwg\sheets\Edmonds\JL—pr01.dwg 34x22 CITY ENGINEERING DIVISION Packet Pg. 102 2.2.a U m Cn a J Q N co 0 N 0 Q Cn a I 9+501 - C � C I I I I I I I I I 1 SSMH 6 RIM=282.00 N=9929.31 - - - E=9730.45 42 LF 8" SS S=0.5 SSMH 5 RIM=284.00 IE=274.07 (8"N) IE=273.97 (8"E) N=9888.10 E=9723.04 J 4" 0 PERE PIPE 6' 1 10' PLAN VIEW T NE 1/4, SW 1/4, SEC. 25, T.27N., R.M., W.M. I I I U) I I I I BAYFILTER WATER QUALITY VAULT 1 I I I C5.1 I I I FIRE HYDRANT I rWATER METER (TYP) 13TH WAY SW INFILTRATION GALLERY (STORMTECH OR SIMILAR) IE=273.44 (8"NW) IE=273.34 (8"E) N=9870.56 E=9802.37 O FG=284.0 0 FG=282.0 � \ I SD W V2.1 \ 14 ha - - - - - - 12400 - - \ �W I I I \ ' I 1 I I EX. SS TO BE 1 REDUCED AS SHOWN / CO rA -I I � I I � I � I I I � I I 4" 0 STUB TO ROOF/FOOTING DRAIN YARD DRAIN i d MARK CENTER OF DRYWELL W/ 1" CAPPED PVC OR OTHER MEANS FLUSH WITH SURFACE EACH DRYWELL FILLED WITH 11" - 3" WASF DRAIN ROCK SI SHALL BE LINED WITH FILTER FABRIC 1 DRYWELL SYSTEM - N.T.S. / RIM=282.50 IE=272.06 (6"W) IE=272.96 (8"S) / N=9932.73 / E=9902.91 I E- - ► �46 LF 8" SS S=0.50% I � / I _LF_ -8 S - S`=�733T - - - PROFILE VIEW • � T SSMH#1 ASS - RIM=283.50 IE=272.73 (8"S) IE=272.73 (8"N) IE=272.63 (8"E) L _ _ _ _ N=9888.78 EX. SSMH 13+00_F _ - D� I' I' E=9889.44 RIM=274.93 I IE=268.23 (8"W) SSMH#2 IE=268.23 (8"E) RIM=283.60 IE=272.94 (8"W) N=9879.40 I IE=272.84 (8"N) E=10021.31 I N=9868.26 I E=9883.15 I i :M 1 I I I I ---- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I --------� ----------I---------- I I Know what's below. Call before you dig. N 20 0 20 40 1 "=20' Scale Feet APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDMONDS DATE: m_ CITY ENGINEERING DIVISION 0 II° a N I I I I o I I I I I I o z m T m m T C C Y > 0 (p ¢ m s c a, co Q p Y p Y U Y Q o p T O. v M z � O +, Cn O V 0 0 > T a �w a- � v' a z 0 N co E � 0 N N a a� 3 70 V' VC3 Vim/ LL M } C W U •E � N •o .o c p10 U � •5 00 � ") L0 •i p X a 3 A) co 1 eM 10 c 00 N 3 � N ai O a z a J � Ca N CM N CD W m rn 0 cn ¢ _�� m W w m 0 = ¢ 0 0 U W CO a) *' J T z o i F- J i.i W i U VIA Y z W C590 00 N O 0 0 N z J a c �a 0 J a� LL a� m J c a� N rn c a� t a t 3 0 a aD m x W C a� s a R:\Projects\186 (echelbarger)\003-17 (jenkins lane)\Dwg\sheets\Edmonds\JL-sd01.dwg 34x22 Packet Pg. 103 NE 1/4, SW 1/4, SEC. 25, T.27N., R.M., W.M. m p 2.2.a L U Y m W J Q N 66 0 N 0 Q cn 61.25" 32" 26" d ° d ° d d ° 4 4 4 ° d ° d d ° d d 4 ° 0 �jY\\\\\\\ \\\\\\\\ d d \% /\% /\% /\/ %\% /\% /\% /\A 0 0 0 d / ° eBAYSAVER O O O a TECHNOLOGIES �j j j O O O d d O\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \44 J) \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ d ° d d ° 4 d d d SOLID COVER' GRATE INLET CAST IN PLACE CONCRETE COLLAR TO MEET H2O IF APPLICABLE 35" rem PLAN VIEW OUTLET PIPE AIR RELEASE VALVE OUTLET CHAMBER FLOW CONTROL ORIFICE INLET PLATE mining ............. LEG f""'+'+'`'.".'. �������������+� OUTLET COLLECTION MANIFOLD BAYFILTER CBF-1 PROJECT JENKINS LANE LOCATION EDMONDS, WA WATER QUALITY FLOW 0.02-CFS DRAINAGE AREA 6,098 SF PGIS CARTRIDGE DESIGN FLOW RATE 11.25 GPM # BAYFILTER CARTRIDGES 1 TREATED SEDIMENT CAPACITY 175 LBS THE BAYFILTER STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM IS A STORMWATER FILTRATION DEVICE DESIGNED TO REMOVE FINE SEDIMENTS, HEAVY METALS, AND PHOSPORUS. THE BAYFILTER SYSTEM RELIES ON A SPIRAL WOUND MEDIA FILTER CARTRIDGE WITH APPROXIMATELY 45 SQUARE FEET OF FILTRATION AREA. THE FILTER CARTRIDGES REMOVE POLLUTANTS FROM RUNOFF BY FILTRATION (INTERCEPTION/ATTACHMENT) AND ADSORPTION. 2 30x30 SOLID COVER 28" (MIN) 45" (MIN) 17" BAYFILTER WATER QUALITY VAULT NTS BAYFILTER CBF 24x30 GRATE INLET 311 DRAIN DOWN 3111 _ �� 25" 56.25" SECTION A -A 28 (MIN) INLET L 483.88 If OUTLET EL 487.38 INLET EL 483.88 UTLET 45" (MIN) Know what's below. Call before you dig. o d 04" D 28" 5" 5„ (MIN) Mo Nm DRAIN DOWN 30" SECTION B-B OUTLE EL 482.38 APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDMONDS DATE: BY: CITY ENGINEERING DIVISION cn z 0 cn W z W m m T C f/) d > CL Q p Y p Y U Y Q o p m v co T M v I u) O 0 z .8. I V N _ 02 T y 4 I a- � � M •ti V A 0 N O0. O C oa) y 0)a) •� c N a)a� 3 E _0 N rn V' V0 ^ V0J 0 w co w U z 0, •o > 'p 00 U E c//) N - p X a 3 co 0 00 r o p z a J ca N O cn ocoQ Ix W = p 0 a m T z I = o z I I W It J I 7-1 Y Z W C5*1 m W ca J W U W a p 0 H O U R:\Projects\186 (echelbarger)\003-17 (jenkins lane)\Dwg\sheets\Edmonds\JL—utdt01.dwg 34x22 Packet Pg. 104 2.2.a .. LOT � ���E� �p'�E►�r .�a�T THAT PORTION OF LOT 4, CITY OF EDMONDS SHORT PLAT SP 50-79, AS RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 810812ol98, BEING A PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 25, TOWNSHIP 27 NORTH, RANGE 3 EAST, W.M. IN SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON; DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 4; THENCE NORTH 88022'26" WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 4, A DISTANCE OF 112.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 05057'32" WEST A DISTANCE OF 6o.17 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88022'26" EAST A DISTANCE OF loo.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 4; THENCE NORTH 17002'35" EAST ALONG SAID EAST LINE A DISTANCE OF 62.24 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH, STATE OF WASHINGTON, Sv� ATTAC Packet Pg. 105 2.2.a LOT z THAT PORTION OF LOT 4, CITY OF EDMONDS SHORT PLAT SP So-79, AS RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 8108120198, BEING A PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 25, TOWNSHIP 27 NORTH, RANGE 3 EAST, W.M. IN SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON; DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 4; THENCE NORTH 88022'26" WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 4, A DISTANCE OF 112.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 05°57'32" WEST A DISTANCE OF 60.17 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 05057'32" WEST A DISTANCE OF 65.19 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88°22'26" EAST A DISTANCE OF 1oo.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 4; THENCE NORTH 17002'35" EAST ALONG SAID EAST LINE A DISTANCE OF 67.43; THENCE NORTH 88022'26" WEST A DISTANCE OF 1oo.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH, STATE OF WASHINGTON. Packet Pg. 106 2.2.a LOT 3 THAT PORTION OF LOT 4, CITY OF EDMONDS SHORT PLAT SP So-79, AS RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 8108120198, BEING A PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 25, TOWNSHIP 27 NORTH, RANGE 3 EAST, W.M. IN SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASH I NGTON; DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 4; THENCE NORTH 88022'26" WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 4, A DISTANCE OF 112.o0 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 05057'32" WEST A DISTANCE OF 121.o0 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 05057'32" WEST A DISTANCE OF 4.36 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88122'26" EAST A DISTANCE OF 87.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 4; THENCE SOUTH 17002'35" WEST ALONG SAID EAST LINE A DISTANCE OF 62.23 TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 4; THENCE NORTH 88021'26" WEST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 4, A DISTANCE OF 85.o6 FEET; THENCE NORTH 05°57'32" EAST A DISTANCE OF 64.53 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88022'26" EAST A DISTANCE OF 2o.o6 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH, STATE OF WASHINGTON. Packet Pg. 107 2.2.a LOT 4 THAT PORTION OF LOT 4, CITY OF EDMONDS SHORT PLAT SP 50-79, AS RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 8108120198, BEING A PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 25, TOWNSHIP 27 NORTH, RANGE 3 EAST, W.M. IN SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON; DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 4; THENCE NORTH 88022'26" WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 4, A DISTANCE OF 132.o6 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 05°57'32" WEST A DISTANCE OF 1oo.oc FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 05057'32" WEST A DISTANCE OF 85.53 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 4; THENCE NORTH 88°22'26" WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE A DISTANCE OF 78.8o FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 4; THENCE NORTH 1601343" EAST ALONG SAID THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 4, A DISTANCE OF 77.So FEET TO A POINT OF CURVE CONCAVE TO THE WEST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 257.79 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF o2°21'oo"; THNECE ALONG SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT AN ARC DISTANCE OF 10.57 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88°22'26" EAST A DISTANCE OF 63.27 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH, STATE OF WASHINGTON, Packet Pg. 108 2.2.a LOT 5 THAT PORTION OF LOT 4, CITY OF EDMONDS SHORT PLAT SP 50-79, AS RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 8108120198, BEING A PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 25, TOWNSHIP 27 NORTH, RANGE 3 EAST, W.M. IN SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON; DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 4; THENCE NORTH 88122'26" WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 4 A DISTANCE OF 132.o6 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 88022'26" WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE 4 A DISTANCE OF 44.95 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTH, HAVING A RADIUS OF 2o.00 FEET, AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 9o°oo'oo"; THNECE ALONG SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT AN ARC DISTANCE OF 31.24 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 4; THENCE SOUTH 01037'34" WEST ALONG SAID WEST LINE A DISTANCE OF 25.ol FEET TO A POINT OF CURVE CONCAVE TO THE WEST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 257.79 FEET, AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 12°l5'o9"; THENCE ALONG SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT AN ARC DISTANCE OF 55•13 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88022'26" EAST A DISTANCE OF 63.27 FEET; THENCE NORTH o5'57'31" EAST A DISTANCE OF loo.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH, STATE OF WASHINGTON, Packet Pg. 109 2.2.a TRACT 999 THAT PORTION OF LOT 4, CITY OF EDMONDS SHORT PLAT SP 50-79, AS RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 81o8120198, BEING A PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 25, TOWNSHIP 27 NORTH, RANGE 3 EAST, W.M. IN SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON; DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 4; THENCE NORTH 88022'26" WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 4, A DISTANCE OF 112.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 88022'26" WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE, A DISTANCE OF 2o.o6 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 05°57'32" WEST A DISTANCE OF 121.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88022'26" EAST A DISTANCE OF 2o.o6 FEET; THENCE NORTH 05°S7'32" EAST A DISTANCE OF 121.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH, STATE OF WASHINGTON, Packet Pg. 110 2.2.a ❑C�iJ"�' N on& Utfie�s C wfi m U C CUSTOMER - EUC CONTACT Form A coordinated utility environment which maximizes joint utility opportunities to provide quality service for the citizens of Edmonds YOU WILL BE GIVEN A CONFIRMATION NUMBER BY EACHUTILITY ONCE YOU HAVE INFORMED THEM OF YOUR PROJECT. SITE ADDRESS: --! " O l l-�N W" ggnt-o a �a P� v # W K CX Rob Lctobn Mary McAllister - 425-670-3216 You will need to provide PUD with a site plan and a completed New Service Questionnaire. PUGET SOUND # ENERGY New Customer Construction Call to verify gas availability and to coordinate service install. You will need to Department - 1-888-321-7779 provide parcel number, contact phone number and mailing address. Frardipr N4eleomn sa 7ha New You will need to provide Frontier with the location of your project, total line Jeremy Fallt - 425-263-4024 requirement, and the date in which service is required. A copy of your # You will need to provide Comcast with the location of your project, a copy of Mike Fontenot 425-263-5482 your development and site plan (digital copy if available.) The date in which A Q service is required and a list of contact names, phone numbers & mailing �AHPH: y� via Ae(C 5; M,L �� _S7YIFR dis� f.f `V Steve Dunphy - 425-774-7769 ext. 110 You will need to provide OVWSD with the survey map of your site and For customers in Olympic View Service Area complete a development information form. THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AND GIVEN TO DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF AT THE TIME OF PERMIT SUBMITTAL Rev. 10i 1/13 ATTAC Packet Pg. 111 2.2.a t�:PtC y XF OLYMPIC VIEW WATER & SEWER DISTRICT 8128 228th St. SW Phone (425) 774-7769 Edmonds WA 98026-8449 Fax (425) 670-1856 June 13, 2017 RE: Water Availability To Whom It May Concern: Board of Commissioners ' John Elsasser Mike Harrigan Lora Petso cIv pr CO UIV PER s HV1C1_" Olympic View Water and Sewer District currently provides water services to 720131h Way SW, Edmonds, WA. It is the District's understanding that this site is proposed to be redeveloped. The District has the ability to provide service to this redeveloped site once required system improvements are completed, if necessary. If further information is needed, please contact the District at the above number, Sincerely, X� r Kelly Boswell, Administration Manager Olympic View Water & Sewer District CC: File ATTAC I Packet Pg. 112 2.2.a RECORDED SEWER EASEMENT OVER & ACROSS 722 & 724 13th WAY Receiv JUN '�t+�rtoP � 3 �d�T Fw 0DUA�F� fiwc&� ATTAC Packet Pg. 113 2.2.a •� 19�i��- /.z3•-Z . -, Sanitary Sewer Easement y 4 FebdJfh 1977 j West Coent Devolopmvnt Co,, A Washington Corp, does hereby S great a Easement for • 3ebito ry Sewer over and across the South Five feet of Lot one &lea over and across the North 5 feet of Lot 2 of Sunset West Division No 7 City of Edmonds, �I Thin FAaemont in for the 'Benefit of Lend owned by Mr Leo Le Fevre 720 13th Way Edmonde, which In adjmeent to the fleet of the Plat called Sunset ;lest No 7. It iM oleo understood that any liability for maintenance _ t� or upkeep or repair to be the sole problem of Mr Leo Le yDOF pECDADEO/1, fi Fevre or his aviceeeeor. fCO.Cf tat nj[ NO SALES TAX M FEB 17 FM 5 52 4 REQ111RED # Y Eoaee svtxopatant Co. ,, eRy9 "d•ylCµ>:JOIryfR ' I EA 1 N 1971 eakyr; raullr.xasL I �h rt Leo Netts praeidan't`p tY'" STATE A C ttEIlr Imd rrr. slt ayfi_m�: ay mirdoeA ma .worn, pnnAd .Fprarca , M the me"M F Nett ,W swejux, rr,ptcti.cy, of F the mpu.�Ih� Mi d� eRWg �arlrk1l he u\a?Q'-r' noneM to be the free end volunuty art rtui dml of uld rwperdian, ler the rux and ppwpout�th rrin mrmionN, +rni. p+th %erd the ..dtgwrrd n venue ur sW heir—M and Wu Ih il affixed (if any) is d,r rPilo ns! of Mid eorpor.tien. . Wes. my h,ad rna cg,Ed wi hr.ety .dnrd y... fins above M . xe. eu, nuava... •.r•..wa. � ,� M1 •�. Packet Pg. 114 2.2.a June 23, 2017 Jenkins Lane Drainage Report 720 13t" Way SW, Edmonds, WA 98020 SDA Project #186-003-17 Prepared for: Echelbar er Homes and Land 4001 198 h St. SW #2 Lynnwood, WA 98036 CIVIL ENGINEERING I PROJECT MANAGEMENT I PLANNING "Nq* 1724 W. Marine View Drive, Suite 140, Everett, WA 98201 1425.486.65331 www.sdaengineers.com ATTAC r Packet Pg. 115 2.2.a Jenkins Lane Drainage Report Prepared For: Echelbar9er Homes and Land 4001 198 " St. SW #2 Lynnwood, WA 98036 Prepared By: SDA Engineers 1724 West Marine View Drive, Ste 140 Everett, WA 98201 (425) 486-6533 r 1 / 1 �39018 06-23-17 Last save by: Tiffany Hoang on 6/23/17 R:\Projects\186 (Echelbarger)\003-17 (Jenkins Lane)\Technical\Reports\Jenkins Lane Drainage Report.docm Jenkins Lane Drainage Report Packet Pg. 116 2.2.a TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • Executive Summary • Vicinity Map SECTION 1 - PREPARATION OF STORMWATER SITE PLANS • Task 1: Define and map the study area • Task 2: Review all available information on the study area • Task 3: Field inspect the study area • Task 4: Describe the drainage system, and its existing and predicted problems • Appendix 1 A — Existing Condition Summary Documents • Appendix 1 B — Geotechnical Engineer's Report • Appendix 1 C — Downstream Flowpath Analysis SECTION 2 - STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) • 1.0 - Introduction • 2.0 - Site Description • 3.0 - Construction Stormwater BMPs • 4.0 - Construction Phasing and BMP Implementation • 5.0 - Pollution Prevention Team • 6.0 - Site Inspections & Monitoring • 7.0 - Reporting & Recordkeeping • Appendix 2A - Site Plan with BMP Measures • Appendix 2B - SWPPP Project Summary • Appendix 2C - Alternative BMPs • Appendix 2D - General Permit • Appendix 2E - Site Log & Inspection Forms SECTION 3 — SOURCE CONTROL OF POLLUTION • Source Control of Pollution SECTION 4 - PRESERVATION OF NATURAL DRAINAGE SYSTEMS AND OUTFALLS • Natural Drainage Course Description SECTION 5 - ON -SITE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT • Existing Site Hydrology • Developed Site Hydrology • Performance Standards • Appendix 5A — Basin Mapping Jenkins Lane Drainage Report Packet Pg. 117 2.2.a SECTION 6 - RUNOFF TREATMENT • Runoff Treatment • Appendix 6A — Water Quality Design Calculations SECTION 7 - FLOW CONTROL • Existing Site Hydrology Synopsis • Developed Site Hydrology Synopsis • Flow Control Performance Standards • Appendix 7A — Flow Control Design Calculations SECTION 8 - WETLANDS PROTECTION SECTION 9 — OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE SECTION 10 —OFFSET ANALYSIS AND MITIGATION SECTION 11 — FINANCIAL LIABILITY Jenkins Lane Drainage Report Packet Pg. 118 2.2.a EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 00 N O O r O N Z J d C O .y 7 r O J d LL d C R J N C Y C N N N C N t V R Q t 3 O a m r z x w r c m E a Jenkins Lane Drainage Report Packet Pg. 119 2.2.a EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Jenkins Lane project proposes the construction of 5 single family residential building lots on approximately 0.83 acre parcel, located on 720 13th Way SW, Edmonds, Washington. The project will clear, grade and construct a neighborhood residential roadway, utility extensions, and stormwater infrastructure. The project is located in a portion of the NW quarter of Section 25, TWP 27N, RGE 3E, W.M. in the City of Edmonds. The existing Snohomish County tax parcel is 27032500314100. A vicinity map has been included as Figure 1 of this document. The existing site is a developed lot with a relatively constant mild slope towards the north. The elevation of the property drops from 284 feet along the southern border to 282 along the north border adjacent to 13th Way SW. The project site is a parallelogram in shape and bounded to the north and east by 13th Way SW. There is an existing single family residence, additional storage structures, and a driveway on the property. These existing structures will be removed in preparation for the project. The project is subject to the provisions of Chapter 18.30 of the City of Edmonds Stormwater Code Supplement to Edmonds Community Develop Code, which is supplemented to the Washington State Department of Ecology Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington (2005 edition). The project will add more than 5,000 square feet of new impervious surface and considered as a Category 2 Small Site Project; thus minimum requirements 1-11 apply to this project, including both flow control and water quality requirements. Since the entire parcel falls consistently to the north, the project site occupies a single threshold discharge area (TDA). The project is required to utilize on -site stormwater management techniques, and is proposing to use infiltration facilities. Roof runoff will be infiltrated with the use of drywells to meet this requirement. The roadways are considered as a pollution generating impervious surface (PGIS) and therefore will be treated by a water quality vault containing BayFilter cartridges. Once treated, stormwater will be routed into an infiltration facility where stormwater will percolate into the native soil. For the frontage, it is not feasible to detain and/or treat all of this area. Therefore the runoff from the bypass basin will flow east into the existing storm drainage system along 13th Way SW and will ultimately discharge into Willow Creek. Jenkins Lane Drainage Report Packet Pg. 120 APRIL2010 2.2.a Figure 2-1: Project Classification Does the project involve 1- yes acre or more of Iand- disturbingactivity? No Yes Is the project part of a larger common plan of development or sale where the total disturbed area for the entire plan will total 1-acre or more of land -disturbing activity? No Does the Project involve one or more of the following: 2,000 square feet or more of new impervious surface, replaced impervious surface or new plus replaced impervious surface? OR 7,000 square feet of land -disturbing activity? OR 50 cubic yards or more of either grading, f I4 or excavation as defined in Chapter 18.40-000 ECDC? No Minor Site Project: Read Chapter 3 and see Chapter 6 for requirements Large Site Project Read Chapter 3 and see Chapter 4 for requirements Does the project create or add 5,000 square feet of new impervious surface, replaced impervious surface or new plus replaced impervious surface? OR Yes Convert % acre or more of native vegetation to lawn 10 or landscaped area OR Through a combination of creating effective impervious surface and converted pervious surfaces, causes an increase of 0.1 cubic feet per second in the 100-year flow frequency from a threshold discharge area as estimated usnrg an approved model? \ o V Yes Category 1 Small Site Project: Read Chapter 3 and see Chapter 5 for requirements 1 Assumes the project in question meets applicability requirements of ECDC 18.30.030_ Category 2 Small Site Project: Read Chapter 3 and see Chapter 5 for requirements di iOS•Od1d0.000edmandssmrmw,rwe ppivm nefoil doe 2.0 CLASSIFYING PROJECTS 5 Packet Pg. 121 I 2.2.a I VICINITY MAP 0 z w � o a x o o � tiP a. S a. MAIN DAITON � 1�P � �2 2 N N N WALNUI ST TA �! � > Q w 2 Z n Of B0W0p�N 3 Edwards Point s x m � N ELM T a 22 TH ST SW o z � x ST 0 J a 226TH x ST SW a x ao F 3 O os r rn �9� 226T ST SW 22 OA�� R IV 11 Deer LOCATION Cr 21 s� 3 0 Q Y x a a a 38 H W 0 238TH ST SW 3 0 � o 244T ST SW z J N 20 TH N C O O) J C O rn O C S y � c m -o a M cn o 0 a J N O n 1Z In L f U TPH ro DesignN 0 Drawn a 06/12/2017 N o Date f a 186- 003- 17 C: .. Project No. ®®® Engineering Project Managege ment Planning 1724 W. Marine View Drive, Suite 140; Everett, Washington 98201 Ofllce:425.486.6533 Fax 425.486.6593 w saaengineers.com JENKINS LANE VICINITY MAP N (T� QJN.T.S. NTS Scale Packet Pg. 122 1 2.2.a SECTION 1 PREPARATION OF STORMWATER SITE PLANS Jenkins Lane Drainage Report Packet Pg. 123 2.2.a PREPARATION OF STORMWATER SITE PLANS The project is subject to the drainage regulations outlined in Volume 1 from the Department of Ecology's 2005 Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington (SWMMWW). This report, along with the accompanying plans, is intended to satisfy the drainage manual's site plan preparation requirements. The manual also requires completion of the following four tasks as part of the site plan preparation process: Task 1: Define and map the study area The project site consists of 1 parcel totaling approximately 0.83 acres. The site is developed with a single family home, small structures, and a driveway. The applicant is proposing to subdivide the existing parcels into 5 residential lots. The project study area includes the project site itself, and a downstream flowpath for a distance of/4 mile Task 2: Review all available information on the study area The NRCS Web Soil Survey classifies the underlying soil at the project site as Everett Series. Everett Soils are typically referred to as sandy glacial outwash and are generally suitable for infiltration systems. The NRCS Web Soil Survey is included in Appendix 1A. FEMA identifies the project site on Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) Panel #53061C1315E, included in Appendix 1A. The project site is not expected to be within a flood hazard area. The project's geotechnical engineer, Earth Solutions NW LLC, issued a report on June 15, 2017 addressing the feasibility of infiltration of stormwater runoff via an infiltration facility that penetrates an underlying outwash layer. This report provided a design (factored) infiltration rate of 11.5-in/hr. The geotechnical report has been provided in Appendix 1 B. Task 3: Field inspect the study area A field visit of the study area was conducted on June 12, 2017. The conditions at the time of the visit were cloudy and dry, with recent rainfall having occurred. The site generally falls toward the north where 13th Way SW contains an existing stormwater management system. Surface runoff from the project site generally flows north into 13 Way SW where it is routed east. 13th Way SW currently has a crowned roadway section, so runoff is expected to be contained along the south side. Runoff from this structure ultimately discharges to Willow Creek, as discussed in Task 4 below. Task 4: Describe the drainage system, and its existing and predicted problems A downstream flowpath map was taken from the City of Edmonds Stormwater Inventory website, and indicates the known stormwater features near the site. The downstream flowpath map has been provided in Appendix 1C. As mentioned above, the existing site topography falls to the north toward 13th Way SW, and is collected on the south edge of the roadway. Runoff is collected by a catch basin that is located south of the intersection of 13th Way SW and 7th Place S. The underground conveyance system routes the stormwater north and ultimately discharged into Willow Creek. Jenkins Lane Drainage Report Packet Pg. 124 2.2.a APPENDIX 1A EXISTING CONDITION SUMMARY DOCUMENTS Jenkins Lane Drainage Report Packet Pg. 125 2.2.a z z v a F a v a v Q39£6Zs OL9E6ZS 099£6zS 09996Z9 Ob99 Oi,'S M OZ996Z9 06996ZS M „bT ,ZZ oZZT — I I I I I I I M „t T ,ZZ oZZT R O U) 0 M „6T ,ZZ oZZT z a F v a C uvi C c � � n Z O � Ln o, 3 w r I�� 8 a LQ Ln Co Co N � F � W a � r o � � 55�� rl N C � � U F 1 CL O m O �a z� M „6i ,ZZ oZZT Packet Pg. 126 2.2.a 0 Z LU a LU J a Q E O U L a U O w a O U ? E0) CL (0 Q -O m m E m c m — 0) o w 0 O L N �Q3 m Co O O C O NO L a) E O w C:> .0 C o Co a as T Q Lm.E O f4 ci E .. E Qo m as m w m E H 0 i7 .O ' N N (n NE2E� cE m o p ma m o-�ai m N C O U c wE_oun w C a> 0 U N N m r m m _@ CO � O m 3 � 3 C o 0 A a w O —Co U O O C m O Co0 E an 3 mN 'o � N N C Q N Y (D o 0 j al '0G m�`umi0 L m E n u°�QO �n (0 M m O cn U >m > O Y w c a) o� Z.02 -0 .: E �� Q 0 U m O m 75 o o CIJ3 a o m> E 00 w m@� o amp) >1 @ � 3 L Co L U M O O 11 C Q N (6 O O @ C Q O O a) N C O 0 Q O Q Co (D m �Y o a) m w 3 U U m Q 0) 0 Q= co-0aE c o m T O U Z O� m m v - m O E >, m a) E m N o- Coo- O U N (O mO a) -0 a O L 0 N E N O_ V O Q 'Co Co N " m (n > N N .� .L.. 0 .0m (D a' Z E E U EL cd m 2 fn ar-i :? io 2 a> a) m O N O " .0 •E .L.. T ? >aa) > L (D (DN 0I CO (0 f0 (0 E O >. 3 CL 00 C m 3< j y a U 75 y O Q w Co O '0 Q m m Co �a o N 3 U In '-O-O ooa�mm w .0 C m om i'Q 3 T Qo m o 13) N m m -0 o i a°?w a�'v Q> mL°' cn Eo :=a (D E m CL E (n > U Q_ -0 Q m H O (n (n (n N F U y i y cc a N C a) cc LL U m - L O_ rn (n N a m N N O Na C J N m N O Co L o c CL O Z L_ N L u a) ly o o U m fn In O _ m CO O W c Z) J Q a �o O N } uz * d l a j [ Co M o y w a m� o 9 o o Q Co U) ; a w a N m ` d a a 3 m N 'o a ° 0 ° a O o m m m 0 0 a � T= y O ) occ d 2 o o > w o o U) Q @ LL 3 3 (n O T � N > > 'o LL Co ia) C.) 2 o a N 2! Q .O •O n n •� (n C O '0 m m U U 2 (D L�N 0 aa' 0 w a m a) 0 C m � m OZ5 0 m a c R❑ l ■ � a 1G1 3p( CK X 0 ¢ pq 0 4 #r +� ,G�, 0 � a 0 + c❑ Q M 0 Packet Pg. 127 2.2.a Soil Map —Snohomish County Area, Washington Map Unit Legend Snohomish County Area, Washington (WA661) Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI 17 Everett very gravelly sandy 1.0 100.0% loam, 0 to 8 percent slopes Totals for Area of Interest 1.0 100.0% usDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 6/12/2017 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3 Packet Pg. 128 V) Z NI wwww w Cm CD C zQ a W f� � d �� �"4�g �= z a OA U ZO w g ssu HCW�1 W a c c = Go E. O r° e ti Z O w Ln A 0 z> uo CD Q 0 06 Z ZQ Ed Z w w 3so 2 pia oz Z Li U� r-� O_ U O Oi�00Z cc H r~ d X � O uj o0 Z o ® m w" N `^ Oxn �' 108TH AVENUE W 0 = W a'.: G7 W u7 F O9 pp Q O7 ao �=w QM `%m LJ L°Z w W W � O Z C'M 2.2.a E W CO 3 a W N w C m S Ea O E T O0E u O N o ? t O N LL 52$ a! o m c' � v�sZo 6 N U 9 Q i QNm� N � Nmoo O a E ELL I- . C, r y `o cCDvo� cc9. w N w 0 LL Z 00 0Lo J b m H T O 1 a. k oE a L C > LLL U O � C L N m MnL u J y-E ' IF v a)LL o O O E c SZ mom° C o E 7 Nmm°m Cl) Nmma)o ++ F3`o a CIO � � s Z i UW x�m W ~®vmi O® � Z Packet Pg. 129 2.2.a SECTION 1B GEOTECHNICAL REPORT Jenkins Lane Drainage Report Packet Pg. 130 June 15, 2017 ES-5320 Echelbarger Investments, LLC 4001 — 1981h Street Southwest, #2 Lynnwood, Washington 98036 Attention: Mr. Todd Echelbarger Subject: Geotechnical Evaluation Proposed Short Plat 720 —13th Way Southwest Edmonds, Washington Reference: Insight Engineering Co. Pre-App April 24, 2017 1 Earth I Solutions NWL Earth Solutions NW I_I_c • Geotechnical Engineering • Construction Monitoring • Environmental Sciences Department of Ecology (DOE) 2012 Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington (SMMWM) As Amended, December 2014 James P. Minard Geologic Map of the Edmonds East and Part of the Edmonds West Quadrangles Washington, 1983 Dear Mr. Echelbarger.- As requested, Earth Solutions NW, LLC (ESNW) has prepared geotechnical evaluation report for the proposed residential short plat. Our scope of services included subsurface investigation, engineering analysis, and preparation of this report with recommendations pertinent to the geotechnical aspects of the project. As part of the subsurface investigation, ESNW observed the excavation of six test pits on May 30, 2017. Project Description The subject site is located at 720 — 13th Way Southwest in Edmonds, Washington, as illustrated on the Vicinity Map (Plate 1). The site consists of a single residential tax parcel (Snohomish County parcel number 27032500314100) covering approximately 0.83 acres of land area. The site is currently developed with a single-family residence and associated improvements. The site topography is relatively level. 1805 - 136th Place N.E., Suite 201 • Bellevue, WA 98005 • (425) 449-4704 • FAX (425) 449-4711 Packet Pg. 131 Echelbarger Investments, LLC June 15, 2017 2.2.a ES-5320 Page 2 Based on the pre-app plan provided to us, the existing structure and improvements will be removed and the site will be redeveloped with five residential lots, an access road, and associated improvements. We understand the stormwater design will incorporate infiltration to the extent feasible. Based on the existing grades, we estimate cuts and fills to establish building pad and foundation subgrade elevations will be on the order one to three feet. However, grading plans were not available at the time this report was prepared. At the time this report was prepared, specific building load values were not available. However, we anticipate the proposed residential structure will consist of relatively lightly -loaded wood framing supported on conventional foundations. Based on our experience with similar developments, we estimate wall loads on the order of two kips per linear foot and slab -on -grade loading of 150 pounds per square foot (psf). If the above design assumptions are incorrect or change, ESNW should be contacted to review the recommendations in this evaluation. ESNW should review the final design to verify the geotechnical recommendations provided in this report have been incorporated into the plans. Subsurface Conditions As part of this geotechnical evaluation, an ESNW representative observed, logged, and sampled six test pits on May 30, 2017, excavated at accessible locations within the proposed development area, using a mini-trackhoe and operator provided by the client. The approximate locations of the test pits are depicted on Plate 2 (Test Pit Location Plan). Please refer to the test pit logs (attached) for a more detailed description of subsurface conditions. Representative soil samples collected at the test pit locations were analyzed in general accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS) and United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) methods and procedures. Topsoil Topsoil was observed extending to depths of approximately 6 to 12 inches below existing grades. The topsoil was characterized by dark brown color and fine organic material. Some root zones were observed to extend below the topsoil. Native Soil Underlying the topsoil, soil conditions at the test pit locations were observed to consist primarily of sand outwash deposits with varying amounts of gravel. The native soil deposits were generally observed to be in a medium dense condition beginning at depths of approximately one and one-half to two feet below existing grades. The medium dense native soil deposits are considered suitable for support of the proposed structures. Geologic Setting The referenced geologic map indicates the project location is underlain by Vashon advance outwash deposits (Qva). The soil conditions observed at the test pit locations were generally consistent with sand outwash soils. Earth Solutions NW, LLC Packet Pg. 132 Echelbarger Investments, LLC June 15, 2017 Groundwater 2.2.a ES-5320 Page 3 Groundwater seepage was not encountered at the time of our subsurface exploration at the test pit locations. However, the presence of localized zones of perched seepage may be encountered in site excavations during the wet season. Groundwater seepage rates and elevations fluctuate depending on many factors, including precipitation duration and intensity, the time of year, and soil conditions. In general, groundwater elevations and flow rates are higher during the winter, spring and early summer months. Critical Areas Based on our investigation and review of applicable codes, there are no Critical Areas (Geologic) present on or adjacent to the site. Geotechnical Considerations Based on the results of our investigation, the proposed single-family structures can be supported on conventional spread and continuous footings bearing on undisturbed competent native soil, compacted native soil, or new structural fill placed on competent native soil. Based on our subsurface exploration, medium dense conditions suitable for foundation support are expected to be encountered beginning at depths of approximately one and one-half to two feet below existing grades. The soils encountered at the test pit locations generally have a low sensitivity to moisture based on the fines content of the soil and will generally be suitable for use as structural fill. Structural fill should consist of suitable granular soils compacted to 95 percent of Modified Proctor (ASTM D1557). Provided the structures will be supported as described above, the following parameters can be used for design of the new foundations: • Allowable soil bearing capacity 2,500 psf ■ Passive earth pressure 300 pcf (equivalent fluid) Coefficient of friction 0.40 A one-third increase in the allowable soil bearing capacity can be assumed for short-term wind and seismic loading conditions. With structural loading as expected, total settlement in the range of one inch is anticipated, with differential settlement of about one-half inch. The majority of the settlements should occur during construction, as dead loads are applied. Seismic Considerations The 2015 IBC recognizes ASCE for seismic site class definitions. In accordance with Table 20.3-1 of ASCE, Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures, Site Class D, should be used for design. Earth Solutions NW, LLC Packet Pg. 133 Echelbarger Investments, LLC June 15, 2017 2.2.a ES-5320 Page 4 In our opinion, the site is not susceptible to liquefaction. The native soil relative density and the absence of an established shallow groundwater table are the primary bases for this opinion. Drainage Surface grades must be designed to direct water away from the buildings. The grade adjacent to the buildings should be sloped away from the buildings at a gradient of at least 2 percent for a horizontal distance of at least four feet. In our opinion, perimeter footing drains should be installed at or below the invert of the building footings. A typical footing drain detail is provided as an attachment (Plate 3). Infiltration Evaluation We understand stormwater collected at driveways and the on -site roadway will likely be managed by an infiltration facility located near the northern edge of the on -site roadway and roof runoff will likely be managed by infiltration trenches or drywells. The referenced Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington (SMMWW) was consulted, as required. As indicated in the Subsurface section of this letter, native soils encountered during our fieldwork were characterized primarily as sand outwash soils. Based on the results of USDA textural analyses, the native soils were classified primarily as slightly gravelly sand to extremely gravelly coarse sand with fines contents of about 0.1 to 3.8 percent. In -situ testing was completed in accordance with the Small-scale Pilot Infiltration Test (PIT) procedure, as outlined in Volume III, Chapter 3, Page 526 of the SMMWW. The testing was completed at a depth of approximately four feet below existing grades at test pit location TP-2. The in -situ rate measured during testing was 34 inches per hour. Because the infiltration rate measured during in -situ testing is considered to be a short-term rate, correction factors must be applied in order to determine a long-term design rate. The correction factors outlined below were used in accordance with Table III-3.3.1 of the 2014 SMMWW outlined in Volume III, Chapter 3, Page 529. The correction factors, along with the measured infiltration rate, were incorporated into the following equation: Ksat design = Ksat initial x CFI x CFt x CFm. a Measured (Ksat initial) e Site variability • Test method • Degree of influent control Y Long-term design infiltration rate (Ksat design) 34 inches per hour CF„ = 0.75 CFt = 0.5 CFn, = 0.9 11.5 inches per hour Earth Solutions NW, LLC Packet Pg. 134 Echelbarger Investments, LLC June 15, 2017 2.2.a ES-5320 Page 5 The design infiltration rate is applicable to facilities located in proximity to the infiltration test location. Should a revised location be pursued for control of driveway and roadway runoff, ESNW should be contacted to perform additional in -situ testing, as necessary. We understand infiltration trenches or drywells will be utilized to control roof runoff. For sizing of roof runoff infiltration trenches or drywells, the site soils should be designed as medium sands. It should be noted that no signs of a seasonal high groundwater level were observed to the maximum explored depth of 10.5 feet below existing grades. ESNW should be retained to observe the construction of infiltration facilities on the subject site in order to confirm soil conditions are as anticipated and perform confirmation infiltration testing at the infiltration design depth and location. Supplementary geotechnical recommendations may be provided at the time of construction, where necessary. It is our opinion that an emergency overflow should be incorporated into facility designs and should be directed to an approved discharge location. On -site Stormwater Manaaement Pursuant to City of Edmonds stormwater management requirements, implementation of on -site stormwater BMPs are required for proposed developments in accordance with specified thresholds, standards, and lists. The intent of BMP implementation is to infiltrate, disperse, and retain stormwater runoff on site to the extent feasible. We understand the proposed development intends to add over 5,000 square feet of new hard surface and therefore must comply with Minimum Requirements (MRs) 1 through 9. MR 5 concerns on -site stormwater management, and the viability of specific BMPs are to be evaluated for each type of proposed surface. The table below summarizes our evaluation of the required BMPs for MR 5, as outlined in the referenced stormwater manual, from a geotechnical standpoint. It is instructed in the referenced stormwater manual that BMPs are to be considered in the order listed (from top to bottom) for each surface type, and the first BMP that is determined to be viable should be used. For completeness, however, we have evaluated each listed BMP for the proposed surface types. Earth Solutions NW, LLC Packet Pg. 135 Echelbarger Investments, LLC June 15, 2017 M Lawns and Landscaped Areas Viable Limitations or Infeasibility Criteria T5.13: Post -construction soil quality and Ye depth (Volume V, Chapter 5) Roofs I� - - T5.30: Full dispersion (Volume V, Chapter 5) T5.10A: Downspout full infiltration systems (Volume III, Chapter 3) T7.30: Bioretention (Volume V, Chapter 7) T5.14A: Rain Gardens (Volume V, Chapter 5) T5.10B: Downspout dispersion systems (Volume III, Chapter 3) T5.10C: Perforated stub -out connections (Volume III, Chapter 3) Other Hard Surfaces T5.30: Full dispersion (Volume V, Chapter 5) T5.15: Permeable pavement (Volume V, Chapter 5) T7.30: Bioretention (Volume V, Chapter 7) T5.14A: Rain Gardens (Volume V, Chapter 5) T5.12: Sheet flow dispersion T5.11: Concentrated flow dispersion (Volume V, Chapter 5) 2.2.a ES-5320 Page 6 s None. No slopes greater than 33 percent are present. The proposed project will not No preserve at least 65 percent of the site. Yes Yes Downspout infiltration systems can be sized based on medium sand soils. Bioretention and rain garden systems can be sized based on medium sand soils. No Proper setbacks and vegetated flow paths are not available. lies None. The proposed project will not No preserve at least 65 percent of the site. Infiltration surface must be advanced Yes to suitable soils anticipated at depths below two to three feet. Based on results of the PIT, a Yes design infiltration rate of 11.5 in/hr can be considered for design. Sheet flow dispersion and concentrated flow dispersion may be feasible, however, proper setbacks and vegetated flow paths may not be available. Earth Solutions NW, LLC Packet Pg. 136 2.2.a Echelbarger Investments, LLC June 15, 2017 Utility Support and Trench Backfill ES-5320 Page 7 In our opinion, the native soils anticipated to be exposed in utility excavations should generally be considered suitable for support of utilities. Organic or highly compressible soils encountered in the trench excavations should not be used for supporting utilities. The native soils should generally be suitable for use as structural trench backfill. Moisture conditioning of the soils will likely be necessary prior to use as structural backfill. Utility trench backfill should be placed and compacted to 95 percent of the modified proctor, or to the presiding jurisdiction specifications. Pavement Sections The performance of site pavements is largely related to the condition of the underlying subgrade. To ensure adequate pavement performance, the subgrade should be in a firm and unyielding condition when subjected to proofrolling with a loaded dump truck. Structural fill in pavement areas should be compacted to the specifications detailed in the Site Preparation and Earthwork section of this report. It is possible that soft, wet, or otherwise unsuitable subgrade areas may still exist after base grading activities. Areas of unsuitable or yielding subgrade conditions may require remedial measures such as overexcavation and replacement with structural fill or thicker crushed rock sections prior to pavement. For relatively lightly -loaded pavements subjected to automobiles and occasional truck traffic, the following sections can be considered for preliminary design: ■ Two inches of hot mix asphalt (HMA) placed over four inches of crushed rock base (CRB), or; ■ Two inches of HMA placed over three inches of asphalt treated base (ATB). Heavier traffic areas for access drives and frontage improvements generally require thicker pavement sections depending on site usage, pavement life expectancy, and site traffic. For preliminary design purposes, the following pavement sections for heavy and higher frequency traffic areas can be considered: • Three inches of HMA placed over six inches of CRB, or; ■ Three inches of HMA placed over four and one-half inches of ATB. The HMA, CRB and ATB materials should conform to WSDOT specifications. Main access drives or areas of frontage improvement may require thicker sections. It should also be noted that City of Edmonds minimum pavement design sections may supersede the recommendations provided above. Earth Solutions NW, LLC Packet Pg. 137 2.2.a Echelbarger Investments, LLC June 15, 2017 Limitations ES-5320 Page 8 The recommendations and conclusions provided in this geotechnical evaluation report are professional opinions consistent with the level of care and skill that is typical of other members in the profession currently practicing under similar conditions in this area. A warranty is not expressed or implied. Variations in the soil and groundwater conditions observed at the test pit locations may exist, and may not become evident until construction. ESNW should reevaluate the conclusions in this geotechnical evaluation letter if variations are encountered. Should you require additional information, or have questions, please call. Sincerely, EARTH SOLUTIONS NW, LLC Henry T. Wright, P.E. Senior Project Engineer Attachments: Plate 1 — Vicinity Map Plate 2 — Test Pit Location Plan Plate 3 — Footing Drain Detail Test Pit Logs Grain Size Distribution i 1 Raymond A. Coglas, P.E. Principal Earth Solutions NW, LLC Packet Pg. 138 2 1 .a PI %a -- A . I W Al 7RAr .:f W�Tr AUX ■ " �" AAR k L 11prH SW LLE I NTH —Flim A n 11118 FL V, Jr a SW OM !F a • -A V, 120 M J� A( WA -, sw 5 1 1916A W51 S%V TL U4 4 PE CAAK 5T QHT� r 14 VIM I.L N "IN E ;L ?ON " . -t; W ic! PI tit w 79 1 R- I r :� Wit m.- IAN ic .0% PT"ay ..Im iF T neirr.-kri. %, MWIA 93. ft MIL rA pai TFLID az Mein I 'L STZ A r V "U" F"WIP rR MAP.: jaf—UDZ Or In -,A T kk 'k -Hjdj Sr P LQM.. W IL CIE �A % 'LqAMrLN 21 P % "L 2;Mt . RkI d" M %I -"JL: "t 410 2$ WEinw-n k. I-V 'Al t I it kk lal ST 7 so MTH1. LIN rL L %rr Reference: NORTH Earth luti Solutions] [ENWILLC Earth Solutions NWLLC Snohomish County, Washington lift hnical Engineering, Construction Monitoring Map 454 and Environmental Sciences By The Thomas Guide Rand McNally Vicinity Map 32nd Edition 13th Way Short Plat Edmonds, Washington NOTE: This plate may contain areas of color. ESNW cannot be responsible for any subsequent misinterpretation of the information Drwn. CAM Date 06/13/2017 P roj. No. 5320 resulting from black & white reproductions of this plate. Checked HTW Date June 2017 Plate 1 I Packet Pg. 139 2.2.a Sa�ual�S ItwawuOalnu3 Put - SuiaozluoW uoi3�nalsuo''Suuaaui8u3 It�iuy�aloa� 011MN suoi;n10s - . 3„MN suoilnloS Njjp3 ujjp3 ■. — — '. C N O CD O O C a N C L O O in E O c O 0 LL -OO CO E O = f6 U= O C — N m w i6 c :' E E :E-m C .X `p Z o n m 7 C O O C 0 6 Cn C Co W .2 :E U c O U) cc C13N~ = O .2.y-. v fn U 8. c O ` C U O N '2z (6-p�L T> w O= 0 NE O_ � C �� a O� = C d L (6 O N m N -O U (OA L O y O Q U m (�A O .�0-. L V G_ O C O V d C N (` d� O , `O Z Q O o M � M c a m t a> II > Q — w ELLJ N o .__ � >, � c LIJ O COD. O N m -o c H O_ z c_ m a .D in `O z lv 2 I I I I � I � 2 I I I I I N / \ I IL I I I I I I N- I I I I I I I I I d I H I I I I I I I I I I e I I I I I I I I I I a) I -> ca d I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I Packet Pg. 140 Perforated Rigid Drain Pipe (Surround with 1" Rock) NOTES: • Do NOT tie roof downspouts to Footing Drain. • Surface Seal to consist of 12" of less permeable, suitable soil. Slope away from building. LEGEND: 7-7 Surface Seal; native soil or other low permeability material. ti•ti•ti•ti• 1"Drain Rock r�r�r�r�r ti•ti•ti•ti• SCHEMATIC ONLY - NOT TO SCALE NOT A CONSTRUCTION DRAWING Drwn. CAM Date 06/13/2017 Proj. No. 5320 Checked HTW Date June 2017 1 Plate 3 Packet Pg. 141 2.2.a Earth Solutions NWLLC SOIL CLASSIFICATION CHART MAJOR DIVISIONS SYMBOLS TYPICAL DESCRIPTIONS GRAPH LETTER GRAVEL AND CLEAN GRAVELS ' ���' �� i �� GW WELL -GRADED GRAVELS, GRAVEL - MIXTURES, LITTLE OR NO FINES GRAVELLY SOILS (LITTLE OR NO FINES) °& 46o ❑ C�o D Q ❑Q GP POORLY -GRADED GRAVELS, GRAVEL - SAND MIXTURES, LITTLE OR NO FINES COARSE GRAINED SOILS MORE THAN 50% OF COARSE GRAVELS WITH FINES 6 v° u ° D GM SILTY GRAVELS, GRAVEL -SAND - SILT MIXTURES FRACTION RETAINED ON NO. 4 SIEVE (APPRECIABLE AMOUNT OF FINES) GC CLAYEY GRAVELS, GRAVEL - SAND CLAY MIXTURES MORE THAN 50% OF MATERIAL IS SAND AND CLEAN SANDS SW WELL -GRADED SANDS, GRAVELLY SANDS, LITTLE OR NO FINES LARGERTHAN SANDY NO. 200 SIEVE SIZE SOILS (LITTLE OR NO FINES) SP POORLY -GRADED SANDS, GRAVELLY SAND, LITTLE OR NO FINES SANDS WITH FINES _ - SM SILTY SANDS, SAND - SILT MIXTURES MORE THAN OF COARSEE FRACTION PASSING ON NO. 4 SIEVE (APPRECIABLE AMOUNT OF FINES) SC CLAYEY SANDS, SAND - CLAY MIXTURES INORGANIC SILTS AND VERY FINE ML SANDS, ROCK FLOUR, SILTY OR CLAYEY FINE SANDS OR CLAYEY SILTS WITH SLIGHT PLASTICITY FINE GRAINED SOILS SILTS LIQUID LIMIT AND LESS THAN 50 CLAYS CL INORGANIC CLAYS OF LOW TO MEDIUM PLASTICITY, GRAVELLY CLAYS, SANDY CLAYS, SILTY CLAYS, LEAN CLAYS ^_ OL ORGANIC SILTS AND ORGANIC SILTY CLAYS OF LOW PLASTICITY MORE THAN 50% OF MATERIAL IS SMALLER THAN NO. 200 SIEVE MH INORGANIC SILTS, MICACEOUS OR DIATOMACEOUS FINE SAND OR SILTY SOILS slzE SILTS AND LIQUID LIMIT CLAYS GREATER THAN50 CI I INORGANIC CLAYS OF HIGH PLASTICITY OH CLAYS OF MEDIUM TO HIGH HIGH PLASTICITY, ORGANIC SILTS HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS ! _" 2.11 PT PEAT, HUMUS, SWAMP SOILS WITH HIGH ORGANIC CONTENTS DUAL SYMBOLS are used to indicate borderline soil classifications. The discussion in the text of this report is necessary for a proper understanding of the nature of the material presented in the attached logs. Packet Pg. 142 Earth Solutions NW 1805 - 136th Place N.E., Suite 201 Bellevue, Washington 98005 qwm Telephone: 425-449-4704 Fax: 425-449-4711 CLIENT Echelbarger Investments. LLC _-_- PROJECT NUMBER 5320 DATE STARTED 5/30/17 COMPLETED 5/30/17 EXCAVATION CONTRACTOR Precision Siteworks EXCAVATION METHOD LOGGED BY .TJD CHECKED BY HTW NOTES Depth of Topsoil & Sod 12": grass w Q. w = w _j g TESTS ( a. p Q Z C7 MC = 7.60% SW SM oho O� GP o bp - MC = 2.70% MC = 4.60% Q 5 Fines = 0.10% , 3° a D - SP 10 MC = 20.50% Fines = 3.00% 2.2.a TEST PIT NUMBE PAGE 1 OF 1 PROJECT NAME 13th Way Short Plat PROJECT LOCATION Edmonds. Washington GROUND ELEVATION TEST PIT SIZE GROUND WATER LEVELS: AT TIME OF EXCAVATION AT END OF EXCAVATION -- AFTER EXCAVATION -- MATERIAL DESCRIPTION Dark brown TOPSOIL, loose, moist -roots in ton 2' Brown well -graded SAND with silt and gravel, loose, moist Gray poorly graded GRAVEL with sand, medium dense, damp -increasing gravel and cobble size -roots -infiltration test at 4' Gray poorly graded SAND, medium dense, moist 10.5 Test pit terminated at 10.5 feet below existing grade. No groundwater encountered during excavation. No caving observed. Bottom of test pit at 10.5 feet. Packet Pg. 143 Earth Solutions NW 1805 - 136th Place N.E., Suite 201 Bellevue, Washington 98005 Telephone: 425-449-4704 Fax: 425-449-4711 CLIENT Echelbarger Investments, LLC PROJECT NUMBER 5320 DATE STARTED 5/30/17 _ COMPLETED 5/30/17 EXCAVATION CONTRACTOR Precision Siteworks EXCAVATION METHOD LOGGED BY TJD CHECKED BY HTW NOTES Depth of Topsoil & Sod 8-12": grass w _ HLu T W -i CO TESTS C6 O o a� Qz 0 2.2.a TEST PIT NUMBE PAGE 1 OF 9 PROJECT NAME 13th Way Short Plat PROJECT LOCATION Edmonds, Washington GROUND ELEVATION TEST PIT SIZE GROUND WATER LEVELS: AT TIME OF EXCAVATION --- AT END OF EXCAVATION — AFTER EXCAVATION -- MATERIAL DESCRIPTION ° Dark brown TOPSOIL, loose, moist MC = 8.90% TPSL — o. s SW- Brown well -graded SAND with silt and gravel, loose, damp a Gray poorly graded GRAVEL with sand, medium dense, moist GP o MC = 9.80% Fines = 3.80% 5 SP MC = 6.50% 8.0 a M Gray poorly graded SAND, medium dense, moist Test pit terminated at 8.0 feet below existing grade. No groundwater encountered during excavation. No caving observed. Bottom of test pit at 8.0 feet. Packet Pg. 144 2.2.a Earth Solutions NW 1805 - 136th Place N.E., Suite 201 Bellevue, Washington 98005 Telephone: 425-449-4704 Fax: 425-449-4711 CLIENT Echelbarger Investments, LLC PROJECT NUMBER 5320 DATE STARTED 5/30/17 COMPLETED 5130/17 EXCAVATION CONTRACTOR Precision Siteworks EXCAVATION METHOD LOGGED BY TJD CHECKED BY HTW NOTES Depth of Topsoil & Sod 10": grass w U aUJ CoTESTS v a. 0 wo -- o_ � C6 � J Q z =i c� U) 5 MC = 6.90% MC = 3.60% MC = 5.90% Fines = 1.00% TEST PIT NUMBEIR TP-� PAGE 1 OF 9 PROJECT NAME 13th Way Short Plat . PROJECT LOCATION Edmonds, Washington GROUND ELEVATION TEST PIT SIZE GROUND WATER LEVELS: AT TIME OF EXCAVATION AT END OF EXCAVATION _ --- AFTER EXCAVATION MATERIAL DESCRIPTION Dark brown TOPSOIL, loose, moist 1"PSL „ o.s -roots in top 2' SW- Brown well -graded SAND with silt and gravel, loose, damp SM . SP Gray poorly graded SAND, medium dense, damp to moist -gravel in top 2.5' Test pit terminated at 7.0 feet below existing grade. No groundwater encountered during excavation. No caving observed. Bottom of test pit at 7.0 feet. Packet Pg. 145 1 2.2.a Earth Solutions NW 1805 - 136th Place N.E., Suite 201 Bellevue, Washington 98005 Telephone: 425-449-4704 Fax: 425-449-4711 CLIENT _Echelbarger Investments, LLC PROJECT NUMBER 5320 DATE STARTED 5/30/17 COMPLETED 5/30/17 EXCAVATION CONTRACTOR Precision Siteworks EXCAVATION METHOD LOGGED BY TJD CHECKED BY HTW NOTES Depth of Topsoil & Sod 10-12": grass w 0. rw U a g TESTS U S o O wo-- a= vi �aJ Qz O U) 0 MC = 3.80% TEST PIT NUMBER TP� PAGE 1 OF PROJECT NAME 13th Way Short Plat PROJECT LOCATION Edmonds, Washington GROUND ELEVATION TEST PIT SIZE GROUND WATER LEVELS: AT TIME OF EXCAVATION --- AT END OF EXCAVATION -- AFTER EXCAVATION - MATERIAL DESCRIPTION - Dark brown TOPSOIL, loose, moist I PSL , ,a 1, o_s SW- .;: ; ; Brown well -graded SAND with silt and gravel, loose, damp SM : ; 20 -roots in top 2' Gray poorly graded SAND with gravel, medium dense, damp MC = 3.20% 5 SP MC = 5.60% 47, -gravel in top 4' -decreasing gravel content Test pit terminated at 7.5 feet below existing grade. No groundwater encountered during excavation. No caving observed. Bottom of test pit at 7.5 feet. Packet Pg. 146 1 2.2.a Earth Solutions NW TEST PIT NUMBE TP-5 1805 - 136th Place N.E., Suite 201 Bellevue, Washington 98005 PAGE 1 OF Telephone: 425-449-4704 Fax: 426-449-4711 CLIENT Echelbager Investments LLC PROJECT NAME ..13th Way Short Plat _ PROJECT NUMBER 5320 PROJECT LOCATION Edmonds Washington DATE STARTED 5/30/17 COMPLETED 5/30/17 GROUND ELEVATION TEST PIT SIZE EXCAVATION CONTRACTOR Precision Siteworks GROUND WATER LEVELS: EXCAVATION METHOD AT TIME OF EXCAVATION -- LOGGED BY TJD CHECKED BY HTW AT END OF EXCAVATION -- NOTES Depth of Topsoil & Sod 6-8": grass AFTER EXCAVATION — w _W U 2 a g TESTS U a 6 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION Mz 0 TPSL — Dark brown TOPSOIL, loose, damp MC = 5.90% 0.6 Brown well -graded SAND with silt and gravel, loose, damp SW - SM 2.0 Gray poorly graded SAND with gravel, medium dense, damp = MC 2.90% 5 a x m MC = 3.10% Fines = 1.20% Test pit terminated at 7.0 feet below existing grade. No groundwater encountered during excavation. Caving observed from 1.0 to 2.0 feet. Bottom of test pit at 7.0 feet. Packet Pg. 147 1 I 2.2.a I Earth Solutions NW 1805 - 136th Place N.E., Suite 201 Bellevue, Washington 98005 Telephone: 425-449-4704 WASU Fax: 425-449-4711 CLIENT . Echelbarger Investments, LLC PROJECT NUMBER 5320 DATE STARTED 5/30/17 COMPLETED . 5/30/17 EXCAVATION CONTRACTOR Precision Siteworks EXCAVATION METHOD LOGGED BY TJD CHECKED BY HTW NOTES Depth of Topsoil & Sod 6 8": brass _ w _ }of W U F = a C TESTS U a p o - o- =)vi ¢z U) 0 5 n Y TEST PIT NUMBER TP-6 PAGE 1 OF PROJECT NAME 13th Way Short Plat PROJECT LOCATION Edmonds, Washington GROUND ELEVATION GROUND WATER LEVELS: AT TIME OF EXCAVATION -_ AT END OF EXCAVATION -- AFTER EXCAVATION — TEST PIT SIZE MATERIAL DESCRIPTION o.s Dark brown TOPSOIL, loose, moist Brown well -graded SAND with silt and gravel, loose, moist SW - MC = 6.30% SM z o -roots in top 2' Gray poorly graded SAND with gravel, medium dense, damp MC = 2.70% SP 7_o -becomes moist MC = 8.40% Test pit terminated at 7.0 feet below existing grade. No groundwater encountered during excavation. Caving observed from 1.0 to 2.0 feet. Bottom of test pit at 7.0 feet. Packet Pg. 148 1 Earth Solutions NW, LLC GRAIN SIZE DISTRIEh= 1805 - 136th PL N.E., Suite 201 Bellevue, WA 98005 Telephone: 425-449-4704 Fax: 425-449-4711 CLIENT Eohelbar er Investments LLC PROJECT NAME 13th Way Short Plat PROJECT NUMBER ES-5320 PROJECT LOCATION Edmonds U.S. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES I U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS I HYDROMETER 101 9! 9( 8! 8( 7E 7( 6E 6C 55 5C 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 n 1•i=i7 f �mmmom me. aE11 ■!1 Ems• �:�:ruiClll74�>Icn=ins-'���x��C4�IiCS�Y1�i�J f �� -y �+�r"11■�iilf �■■ �fi flf � fill! � N ■ GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS COBBLES GRAVEL SAND coarse I fine coarse medium I fine v N hil rn c O E t ca Q t 3 O d 0.01 0.001 N SILT OR CLAY Specimen Identification Classification Cc CL IL • TP-1 4.50ft. USDA: Gray Extremely Gravelly Coarse Sand. USCS: GP with Sand. 0.99 32.; m TP-1 10.50ft. USDA: Gray Slightly Gravelly Sand. USCS: SP. 0.85 2.3 E A TP-2 3.50ft. USDA: Tan Slightly Gravelly Sand. USCS: SP. 0.96 3.3 * TP-3 7.00ft. USDA: Gray Gravelly Sand. USCS: SP. 0.88 2.6 a O TP-5 7.00ft. USDA: Gray Extremely Gravelly Coarse Sand. USCS: GP with Sand. 0.74 37.f Specimen Identification D100 D60 D30 D10 LL PL PI %Silt °/oClay 4b TP-1 4.5ft. 37.5 13.115 2.299 0.406 0.1 m TP-1 10.5ft. 4.75 0.365 0.22 0.156 3.0 A TP-2 3.5ft. 9.5 0.358 0.192 0.107 3.8 * TP-3 7.Oft. 19 0.609 0.351 0.231 1.0 lei TP-5 7.Oft. 37.5 12.363 1.736 0.329 Packet Pg. 149 2.2.a SECTION 1C DOWNSTREAM FLOWPATH ANALYSIS Jenkins Lane Drainage Report Packet Pg. 150 ziy § ) � E E 2 =ƒ E E / 2 / R ) \ \ � u In Ln 3 0 � � : � > YO ■_ � .. . . � , k $ ■ , � \C ® � � ® �► I■■� � � ■ . \' . ■�- L C 10- 11 59z N It � LSL �L r gSL 749 � \ \ � : 2.2.a k w E co I 2 / Q / ° \} ƒ� Packet Pg. 151 2.2.a Downstream Analysis I rR Aerial view looking east of project site; Flows travel north across the property into 13th Way SW 4 View looking southeast on the northwest corner of the Project Site on 13th Way SW. Runoff via sheet flow heads into 131h Way SW along the north border of the project site. View looking east on the north edge of the Project Site on 13th Way SW. Runoff via sheet flow heads into 13th Way SW ._V along the north border of the project site. Immediately east of the project, 13th Way SW " changes into a steep slope where runoff continues east. Jenkins Lane Drainage Report Packet Pg. 152 2.2.a J View looking east at the intersection of 13"' Way SW and 7t" PI S, east of the Project Site. Runoff is collected into a catch basin located at the intersection of 13t" Way SW and 7t" PI S. Stormwater heads east continuing on 13t" Way SW. View looking east on 13"' Way SW, east of the Project Site. Stormwater heads into another catch basin where it is routed north by crossing 13t" Way b- A: �»�E•a�. SW. View looking north on 13"' Way SW, northeast of the Project Site. Stormwater heads into another catch basin where it continues north between two properties. Eventually the conveyance system releases the stormwater into Willow Creek north of the Project Site. Jenkins Lane Drainage Report Packet Pg. 153 2.2.a SECTION 2 STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN Jenkins Lane Drainage Report Packet Pg. 154 2.2.a CSWPPP ANALYSIS & DESIGN This section, along with the Temporary Erosion and Sediment Control (TESC) Plan contained in the engineering drawings, is intended to serve as the construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) for the project. The SWPPP is outlined in conformance with the 2005 edition of the Washington State Department of Ecology's Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington (DOE Manual). 1.0 — INTRODUCTION An introductory overview of the project has been provided in the Executive Summary of this report 2.0 —SITE DESCRIPTION A general site description has been provided in the Executive Summary of this report. Additional detailed information is provided through the rest of this report. 3.0 — CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER BMPs 3.1 —12 BMP ELEMENTS Element #1 — Mark Clearing Limits To protect adjacent properties and to reduce the area of soil exposed to construction, the limits of construction will be clearly marked before land -disturbing activities begin. Trees that are to be preserved, as well as all sensitive areas and their buffers, shall be clearly delineated, both in the field and on the plans. In general, natural vegetation and native topsoil shall be retained in an undisturbed state to the maximum extent possible. The BMPs relevant to marking the clearing limits are identified in Appendix 2B. Alternate BMPs for marking clearing limits are included in Appendix 2C as a quick reference tool for the onsite inspector in the event the primary BMP(s) are deemed ineffective or inappropriate during construction to satisfy the requirements set forth in the General NPDES Permit (Appendix 2D). To avoid potential erosion and sediment control issues that may cause a violation of the NPDES Construction Stormwater permit, the Certified Erosion and Sediment Control Lead will promptly initiate the implementation of one or more of the alternative BMPs after the first sign that existing BMPs are ineffective or failing. Element #2 — Establish Construction Access Construction access or activities occurring on unpaved areas shall be minimized, yet where necessary, access points shall be stabilized to minimize the tracking of sediment onto public roads, and wheel washing, street sweeping, and street cleaning shall be employed to prevent sediment from entering state waters. All wash wastewater shall be controlled on site. The specific BMPs related to establishing construction access that will be used on this project are identified in Appendix 2B. Alternate construction access BMPs are included in Appendix 2C as a quick reference tool for the onsite inspector in the event the primary BMP(s) are deemed ineffective or inappropriate during construction to satisfy the requirements set forth in the General NPDES Permit (Appendix 2D). To avoid potential erosion and sediment control issues that may cause a violation of the NPDES Construction Stormwater permit, the Certified Erosion and Sediment Control Lead will promptly initiate the implementation of one or more of the alternative BMPs after the first sign that existing BMPs are ineffective or failing. Jenkins Lane Drainage Report Packet Pg. 155 2.2.a Element #3 - Control Flow Rates In order to protect the properties and waterways downstream of the project site, stormwater discharges from the site will be controlled. The specific BMPs for flow control that shall be used on this project are identified in Appendix 2B. Alternate flow control BMPs are included in Appendix 2C as a quick reference tool for the onsite inspector in the event the primary BMP(s) are deemed ineffective or inappropriate during construction to satisfy the requirements set forth in the General NPDES Permit. To avoid potential erosion and sediment control issues that may cause a violation of the NPDES Construction Stormwater permit, the Certified Erosion and Sediment Control Lead will promptly initiate the implementation of one or more of the alternative BMPs after the first sign that existing BMPs are ineffective or failing. In general, discharge rates of stormwater from the site will be controlled where increases in impervious area or soil compaction during construction could lead to downstream erosion, or where necessary to meet local agency stormwater discharge requirements (e.g. discharge to combined sewer systems). Element #4 - Install Sediment Controls All stormwater runoff from disturbed areas shall pass through an appropriate sediment removal BMP before leaving the construction site or prior to being discharged to an infiltration facility. The specific BMPs to be used for controlling sediment on this project are identified in Appendix 2B. Alternate sediment control BMPs are included in Appendix 2C as a quick reference tool for the onsite inspector in the event the primary BMP(s) are deemed ineffective or inappropriate during construction to satisfy the requirements set forth in the General NPDES Permit (Appendix 2D). To avoid potential erosion and sediment control issues that may cause a violation of the NPDES Construction Stormwater permit, the Certified Erosion and Sediment Control Lead will promptly initiate the implementation of one or more of the alternative BMPs at the first sign that existing BMPs are ineffective or failing. In addition, sediment will be removed from paved areas in and adjacent to construction work areas manually or using mechanical sweepers, as needed, to minimize tracking of sediments on vehicle tires away from the site and to minimize wash off of sediments from adjacent streets in runoff. Whenever possible, sediment laden water shall be discharged into onsite, relatively level, vegetated areas (BMP C240 paragraph 4, Volume II page 116). In some cases, sediment discharge in concentrated runoff can be controlled using permanent stormwater BMPs (e.g., infiltration swales, ponds, trenches). Sediment loads can limit the effectiveness of some permanent stormwater BMPs, such as those used for infiltration or biofiltration; however, those BMPs designed to remove solids by settling (wet ponds or detention ponds) can be used during the construction phase. When permanent stormwater BMPs will be used to control sediment discharge during construction, the structure will be protected from excessive sedimentation with adequate erosion and sediment control BMPs. Any accumulated sediment shall be removed after construction is complete and the permanent stormwater BMP will be restabilized with vegetation per applicable design requirements once the remainder of the site has been stabilized. Jenkins Lane Drainage Report Packet Pg. 156 2.2.a Element #5 - Stabilize Soils Exposed and unworked soils shall be stabilized with the application of effective BMPs to prevent erosion throughout the life of the project. The specific BMPs for soil stabilization that shall be used on this project are identified in Appendix 2B. Seeding will be used on disturbed areas that have reached final grade or that will remain unworked for more than thirty days. Plastic Covering will be used on the temporary stock pile areas and elsewhere on the site as needed. Dust control will be implemented as needed, to prevent it being required all roadways and driveways to be paved will receive early application of gravel base. Alternate soil stabilization BMPs are included in Appendix 2C as a quick reference tool for the onsite inspector in the event the primary BMP(s) are deemed ineffective or inappropriate during construction to satisfy the requirements set forth in the General NPDES Permit (Appendix 2D). To avoid potential erosion and sediment control issues that may cause a violation of the NPDES Construction Stormwater permit, the Certified Erosion and Sediment Control Lead will promptly initiate the implementation of one or more of the alternative BMPs after the first sign that existing BMPs are ineffective or failing. The project site is located west of the Cascade Mountain Crest. As such, no soils shall remain exposed and unworked for more than 7 days during the dry season (May 1 to September 30) and 2 days during the wet season (October 1 to April 30). Regardless of the time of year, all soils shall be stabilized at the end of the shift before a holiday or weekend if needed based on weather forecasts. In general, cut and fill slopes will be stabilized as soon as possible and soil stockpiles will be temporarily covered with plastic sheeting. All stockpiled soils shall be stabilized from erosion, protected with sediment trapping measures, and where possible, be located away from storm drain inlets, waterways, and drainage channels. Element #6 - Protect Slopes All cut and fill slopes will be designed, constructed, and protected in a manner than minimizes erosion. The specific BMPs that will be used to protect slopes for this project are identified in Appendix 2B. Alternate slope protection BMPs are included in Appendix 2C as a quick reference tool for the onsite inspector in the event the primary BMP(s) are deemed ineffective or inappropriate during construction to satisfy the requirements set forth in the General NPDES Permit (Appendix 2D). To avoid potential erosion and sediment control issues that may cause a violation of the NPDES Construction Stormwater permit, the Certified Erosion and Sediment Control Lead will promptly initiate the implementation of one or more of the alternative BMPs after the first sign that existing BMPs are ineffective or failing. Element #7 - Protect Drain Inlets All storm drain inlets and culverts made operable during construction shall be protected to prevent unfiltered or untreated water from entering the drainage conveyance system. However, the first priority is to keep all access roads clean of sediment and keep street wash water separate from entering storm drains until treatment can be provided. Storm Drain Inlet Protection (BMP C220) will be implemented for all drainage inlets and culverts that could potentially be impacted by sediment -laden runoff on and near the project site. The inlet protection measures to be applied on this project are identified in Appendix 2B. Jenkins Lane Drainage Report Packet Pg. 157 2.2.a If the primary BMP options are deemed ineffective or inappropriate during construction to satisfy the requirements set forth in the General NPDES Permit (Appendix 2D), or if no BMPs are listed above but deemed necessary during construction, the Certified Erosion and Sediment Control Lead shall implement one or more of the alternative BMP inlet protection options. Element #8 - Stabilize Channels and Outlets Where site runoff is to be conveyed in channels, or discharged to a stream or some other natural drainage point, efforts will be taken to prevent downstream erosion. The specific BMPs for channel and outlet stabilization that shall be used on this project are identified in Appendix 2B. Alternate channel and outlet stabilization BMPs are included in Appendix 2C as a quick reference tool for the onsite inspector in the event the primary BMP(s) are deemed ineffective or inappropriate during construction to satisfy the requirements set forth in the General NPDES Permit (Appendix 2D). To avoid potential erosion and sediment control issues that may cause a violation(s) of the NPDES Construction Stormwater permit, the Certified Erosion and Sediment Control Lead will promptly initiate the implementation of one or more of the alternative BMPs after the first sign that existing BMPs are ineffective or failing. The project site is located west of the Cascade Mountain Crest. As such, all temporary on - site conveyance channels shall be designed, constructed, and stabilized to prevent erosion from the expected peak 10 minute velocity of flow from a Type 1A, 10-year, 24-hour recurrence interval storm for the developed condition. Alternatively, the 10-year, 1-hour peak flow rate indicated by an approved continuous runoff simulation model, increased by a factor of 1.6, shall be used. Stabilization, including armoring material, adequate to prevent erosion of outlets, adjacent stream banks, slopes, and downstream reaches shall be provided at the outlets of all conveyance systems. Element #9 - Control Pollutants All pollutants, including waste materials and demolition debris, that occur onsite shall be handled and disposed of in a manner that does not cause contamination of stormwater. Good housekeeping and preventative measures will be taken to ensure that the site will be kept clean, well -organized, and free of debris. Any required BMPs to be implemented to control specific sources of pollutants are identified in Appendix 2B. The contractor shall implement the following measures as much as is practicable, in order to mitigate pollutant impacts from vehicles, construction equipment, and/or petroleum product storage/dispensing: • All vehicles, equipment, and petroleum product storage/dispensing areas will be inspected regularly to detect any leaks or spills, and to identify maintenance needs to prevent leaks or spills. • On -site fueling tanks and petroleum product storage containers shall include secondary containment. • Spill prevention measures, such as drip pans, will be used when conducting maintenance and repair of vehicles or equipment. • In order to perform emergency repairs on site, temporary plastic will be placed beneath and, if raining, over the vehicle. Jenkins Lane Drainage Report Packet Pg. 158 2.2.a • Contaminated surfaces shall be cleaned immediately following any discharge or spill incident. • The contractor shall implement the following concrete and grout pollution control measures: • Process water and slurry resulting from concrete work will be prevented from entering the waters of the State by implementing Concrete Handling measures (BMP C151). The contractor shall implement the following Solid Waste pollution control measures: • Solid waste will be stored in secure, clearly marked containers. Element #10 - Control Dewatering Foundation, vault, and trench de -watering water, which shall have similar characteristics to stormwater runoff at the site, shall be discharged into a controlled conveyance system prior to discharge to a sediment trap, pond, or other specified facility. Channels must be stabilized as specified in Element #8. Clean, non -turbid de -watering water, such as well -point groundwater, can be discharged to systems tributary to state surface waters, provided the de -watering flow does not cause erosion or flooding of receiving waters. These clean waters should not be routed through stormwater sediment ponds. Highly turbid or contaminated dewatering water shall be handled separately from stormwater. Element #11 - Maintain BMPs All BMPs should be monitored and maintained regularly to ensure adequate operation. A TESC supervisor shall be identified at the beginning of the project to provide monitoring and direct the appropriate maintenance activity. As site conditions change, all BMPs shall be updated as necessary to maintain compliance with local regulations. Temporary BMPs can be removed when they are no longer needed. All temporary erosion and sediment control BMPs shall be removed within 30 days after construction is completed and the site is stabilized. Element #12 - Manage the Project Erosion and sediment control BMPs for this project have been designed based on the following principles: • Design the project to fit the existing topography, soils, and drainage patterns. • Emphasize erosion control rather than sediment control. • Minimize the extent and duration of the area exposed. • Keep runoff velocities low. • Retain sediment on site. • Thoroughly monitor site and maintain all ESC measures Jenkins Lane Drainage Report Packet Pg. 159 2.2.a • Schedule major earthwork during the dry season As this project site is located west of the Cascade Mountain Crest, the project will be managed according to the following key project components: Phasina of Construction The construction project is being phased to the extent practicable in order to prevent soil erosion, and, to the maximum extent possible, the transport of sediment from the site during construction. • Revegetation of exposed areas and maintenance of that vegetation shall be an integral part of the clearing activities during each phase of construction, per the Scheduling BMP (C 162). Seasonal Work Limitations From October 1 through April 30, clearing, grading, and other soil disturbing activities shall only be permitted if shown to the satisfaction of the local permitting authority that silt - laden runoff will be prevented from leaving the site through a combination of the following: o Site conditions including existing vegetative coverage, slope, soil type, and proximity to receiving waters; and o Limitations on activities and the extent of disturbed areas; and o Proposed erosion and sediment control measures. • Based on the information provided and/or local weather conditions, the local permitting authority may expand or restrict the seasonal limitation on site disturbance. • The following activities are exempt from the seasonal clearing and grading limitations: o Routine maintenance and necessary repair of erosion and sediment control BMPs; o Routine maintenance of public facilities or existing utility structures that do not expose the soil or result in the removal of the vegetative cover to soil; and o Activities where there is 100 percent infiltration of surface water runoff within the site in approved and installed erosion and sediment control facilities. Coordination with Utilities and Other Jurisdictions • Care has been taken to coordinate with utilities, other construction projects, and the local jurisdiction in preparing this SWPPP and scheduling the construction work. Inspection and Monitorina • All BMPs shall be inspected, maintained, and repaired as needed to assure continued performance of their intended function. Site inspections shall be conducted by a person who is knowledgeable in the principles and practices of erosion and sediment control. This person has the necessary skills to: o Assess the site conditions and construction activities that could impact the quality of stormwater, and o Assess the effectiveness of erosion and sediment control measures used to control the quality of stormwater discharges. Jenkins Lane Drainage Report Packet Pg. 160 2.2.a • A Certified Erosion and Sediment Control Lead shall be on -site or on -call at all times. • Whenever inspection and/or monitoring reveals that the BMPs identified in this SWPPP are inadequate, due to the actual discharge of or potential to discharge a significant amount of any pollutant, appropriate BMPs or design changes shall be implemented as soon as possible. Maintaining an Updated Construction SWPPP • This SWPPP shall be retained on -site or within reasonable access to the site. • The SWPPP shall be modified whenever there is a change in the design, construction, operation, or maintenance at the construction site that has, or could have, a significant effect on the discharge of pollutants to waters of the state. The SWPPP shall be modified if, during inspections or investigations conducted by the owner/operator, or the applicable local or state regulatory authority, it is determined that the SWPPP is ineffective in eliminating or significantly minimizing pollutants in stormwater discharges from the site. The SWPPP shall be modified as necessary to include additional or modified BMPs designed to correct problems identified. Revisions to the SWPPP shall be completed within seven (7) days following the inspection. 3.2 — SITE SPECIFIC BMPs Site specific BMPs are shown on the TESC plan sheet(s) in Appendix 2A. 4.0 — CONSTRUCTION PHASING AND BMP IMPLEMENTATION The BMP implementation schedule will be driven by the construction schedule. The list below provides an estimate of the anticipated construction schedule. The project site is located west of the Cascade Mountain Crest. As such, the dry season is considered to be from May 1 to September 30, and the wet season is considered to be from October 1 to April 30. 5.0 — POLLUTION PREVENTION TEAM 5.1 ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES The pollution prevention team consists of personnel responsible for implementation of the SWPPP, including the following: • Certified Erosion and Sediment Control Lead (CESCL) — primary contractor contact, responsible for site inspections (BMPs, visual monitoring, sampling, etc.); to be called upon in case of failure of any ESC measures. • Resident Engineer — For projects with engineered structures only (sediment ponds/traps, sand filters, etc.): Site representative for the owner that is the project's supervising engineer responsible for inspections and issuing instructions and drawings to the contractor's site supervisor or representative. • Emergency Ecology Contact — Individual to be contacted at Ecology in case of emergency. • Emergency Owner Contact — Individual that is the site owner or representative of the site owner to be contacted in the case of an emergency. • Non -Emergency Ecology Contact — Individual that is the site owner or representative of the site owner that can be contacted if required. Jenkins Lane Drainage Report Packet Pg. 161 2.2.a • Monitoring Personnel — Personnel responsible for conducting water quality monitoring; for most sites this person is also the CESCL. 5.2 TEAM MEMBERS Names and contact information for those identified as members of the pollution prevention team are provided in the project summary in Appendix 213. 6.0 — SITE INSPECTIONS AND MONITORING Monitoring includes visual inspection, monitoring for water quality parameters of concern, and documentation of the inspection and monitoring findings in a site log book. A site log book will be maintained for all on -site construction activities and will include: A record of the implementation of the SWPPP and other permit requirements; Site inspections; and, Stormwater quality monitoring. For convenience, the inspection forma and water quality monitoring forms included in Appendix 2E of this report include the required information for the site log book. This SWPPP may function as the site log book, if desired, or the forms may be separated and included in a separate site log book. However, if separated, the site log book must be maintained on -site or within reasonable access to the site and be made available upon request to Ecology or the local jurisdiction. 6.1 SITE INSPECTION All BMPs will be inspected, maintained, and repaired as needed to assure continued performance of their intended function. The inspector will be a Certified Erosion and Sediment Control Lead (CESCL) per BMP C160. The name and contact information for the CESCL is provided in Section 5 of this SWPPP. Site inspection will occur in all areas disturbed by construction activities and at all stormwater discharge points. Stormwater will be examined for the presence of suspended sediment, turbidity, discoloration, and oily sheen. The site inspector will evaluate and document the effectiveness of the installed BMPs and determine if it is necessary to repair or replace any of the BMPs to improve the quality of stormwater discharges. All maintenance and repairs will be documented in the site log book or forms provided in this document. All new BMPs or design changes will be documented in the SWPPP as soon as possible. Jenkins Lane Drainage Report Packet Pg. 162 2.2.a 6.1.1 Site Inspection Frequency Site inspections will be conducted at least once a week and within 24 hours following any rainfall event which causes a discharge of stormwater from the site. For sites with temporary stabilization measures, the site inspection frequency can be reduced to once every month. 6.1.2 Site Inspection Documentation The site inspector will record each site inspection using the site log inspection forms provided in Appendix 2E. The site inspection log forms may be separated from this SWPPP document, but will be maintained on -site or within reasonable access to the site and be made available upon request to Ecology or the local jurisdiction. 6.2 Stormwater Quality Monitoring 6.2.1 Turbidity Sampling Monitoring requirements for the proposed project will include turbidity sampling to monitor site discharges for water quality compliance with the 2010 Snohomish County Drainage manual and Snohomish County Code Title 30.63A NPDES Construction Stormwater General Permit (Appendix 2D). Sampling will be conducted at all site discharge points at least once per calendar week. Turbidity monitoring will follow the analytical methodologies described in Section S4 of the 2005 Construction Stormwater General Permit (Appendix 2D). The key benchmark values that require action include 25 NTU and 250 NTU for turbidity. If the 25 NTU benchmark for turbidity is exceeded, the following steps will be conducted: 1. Ensure all BMPs specified in this SWPPP are installed and functioning as intended. 2. Assess whether additional BMPs should be implemented and make revisions to the SWPPP as necessary. 3. Sample the discharge location daily until the analysis results are less than 25 NTU (turbidity) or 32 cm (transparency). If the turbidity is greater than 25 NTU but less than 250 NTU for more than 3 days, additional treatment BMPs will be implemented within 24 hours of the third consecutive sample that exceeded the benchmark value. Additional treatment BMPs will include, but are not limited to, off -site treatment, infiltration, filtration and chemical treatment. If the 250 NTU benchmark for turbidity is exceeded at any time, the following steps will be conducted: 1. Notify Ecology by phone within 24 hours of analysis. 2. Continue daily sampling until the turbidity is less than 25 NTU. 3. Initiate additional treatment BMPs such as off -site treatment, infiltration, filtration and chemical treatment within 24 hours of the first 250 NTU exceedance. Jenkins Lane Drainage Report Packet Pg. 163 2.2.a 4. Implement additional treatment BMPs as soon as possible, but within 7 days of the first 250 NTU exceedance. 5. Describe inspection results and remedial actions that are taken in the site log book and in monthly discharge monitoring reports. 6.2.2 pH Sampling Stormwater runoff will be monitored for pH starting on the first day of any activity that includes more than 40 yards of poured or recycled concrete, or after the application of "Engineered Soils" such as, Portland cement treated base, cement kiln dust, or fly ash. This does not include fertilizers. For concrete work, pH monitoring will start the first day concrete is poured and continue until 3 weeks after the last pour. For engineered soils, the pH monitoring period begins when engineered soils are first exposed to precipitation and continue until the area is fully stabilized. Stormwater samples will be collected daily from all points of discharge from the site and measured for pH using a calibrated pH meter, pH test kit, or wide range pH indicator paper. If the measured pH is 8.5 or greater, the following steps will be conducted: 1. Prevent the high pH water from entering storm drains or surface water. 2. Adjust or neutralize the high pH water if necessary using appropriate technology such as CO2 sparging (liquid or dry ice). 3. Contact Ecology if chemical treatment other than CO2 sparging is planned. 7.0 — REPORTING AND RECORDKEEPING 7.1 RECORDKEEPING 7.1.1 Site Log Book A site log book will be maintained for all on -site construction activities and will include: • A record of the implementation of the SWPPP and other permit requirements; • Site inspections; and, • Stormwater quality monitoring. For convenience, the inspection form and water quality monitoring forms included in Appendix 2E of this report include the required information for the site log book. Jenkins Lane Drainage Report Packet Pg. 164 2.2.a 7.1.2 Records Retention Records of all monitoring information (site log book, inspection reports/checklists, etc.), this Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan, and any other documentation of compliance with permit requirements will be retained during the life of the construction project and for a minimum of three years following the termination of permit coverage in accordance with permit condition S5.C. 7.1.3 Access to Plans and Records The SWPPP, General Permit, Notice of Authorization letter, and Site Log Book will be retained on site or within reasonable access to the site and will be made immediately available upon request to Ecology or the local jurisdiction. A copy of this SWPPP will be provided to Ecology within 14 days of receipt of a written request for the SWPPP from Ecology. Any other information requested by Ecology will be submitted within a reasonable time. A copy of the SWPPP or access to the SWPPP will be provided to the public when requested in writing in accordance with permit condition S5.G. 7.1.4 Updating the SWPPP In accordance with Conditions S3, S4.13, and S9.13.3 of the General Permit, this SWPPP will be modified if the SWPPP is ineffective in eliminating or significantly minimizing pollutants in stormwater discharges from the site or there has been a change in design, construction, operation, or maintenance at the site that has a significant effect on the discharge, or potential for discharge, of pollutants to the waters of the State. The SWPPP will be modified within seven days of determination based on inspection(s) that additional or modified BMPs are necessary to correct problems identified, and an updated timeline for BMP implementation will be prepared. 7.2 REPORTING 7.2.1 Discharge Monitoring Reports Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR) forms will not be submitted to Ecology because water quality sampling is not being conducted at the site. 7.2.2 Notification of Noncompliance If any of the terms and conditions of the permit are not met, and it causes a threat to human health of the environment, the following steps will be taken in accordance with permit section S5.F: 1. Ecology will be immediately notified of the failure to comply. 2. Immediate action will be taken to control the noncompliance issue and to correct the problem. If applicable, sampling and analysis of any noncompliance will be repeated immediately and the results submitted to Ecology within five (5) days of becoming aware of the violation. 3. A detailed written report describing the noncompliance will be submitted to Ecology within five (5) days, unless requested earlier by Ecology. In accordance with permit condition S2.A, a complete application form will be submitted to Ecology and the appropriate local jurisdiction (if applicable) to be covered by the General Permit. Jenkins Lane Drainage Report Packet Pg. 165 2.2.a APPENDIX 2A SITE PLAN WITH BMP MEASURES Jenkins Lane Drainage Report Packet Pg. 166 dllIW8f1S LSl LLOZ-b690 As py� 'ON {Da!OJd LL -E00 -986 aI�S 'yaA 9iHOt `.� Sg q� ��SYsr,2g'�wa �* O 8106£ d' �^ v �" dfilyL t �l woa•sreeu!BueoprMMM E6S9'9BY'SZY :m8 8ES9'9BY'SZY :eO!yO 213`JNVg13H030001 L2138Wf1N 3NOHd 1N3f10 9E086 S I `OOOMNNAI ON" E S WOH 83OOMN H-1 Nb�ld �S31 Wf'N L9 PeW�elO 1OZ86 uo{Bu!4sDM'4-an3 OVL a{!nS'anua —LA auuoyq -MYZL I 6UIUUDId {U8w9BDUDIAJ {oBfad BUU88U16U3 M!0 ® ® ® WrA /;g pau8!sa0 -z!pH �, \ Y ■ W!'N R8 —a BIMS SNOISIA3N WVb' Wa!10 0 0 K K > U ZZ w 0 U ZO O O Ir O U U W m O Uo !L Z K O K 7 Z O w Z 9 2 FU W z w �O Z U f Z O Z Sd fD OZ O N Z U U K \ Z w U ww 0_ w F U O NO VQ) m N O O U� �aQ� O�w 0 0 N 0 - o aaayz Inw 0- 0- w d U N om w d U ¢ �j I xZzWwo�g x zo <_aoB Z 00 w J w x aow�� mu x X N ZaO�ZmZ0 x aOv�NJ�t5 x O v~�3¢ri¢o Z 0. 0 U I I ' I I I I I ' \ % \\_ , I ----------------------- I ' I ' I I , I ----------\ I I j z - S Id H.LLry�� 3 / LU \1 --2M—t--- — z 3 I e I — —276— N I W I I I ♦ I- LU 2 .- � r I 1 x (q I _ 1 I 1� LU Z z Foco I � I cN I I I I z w f I I I I ��z 9 I I z wwoZ I I 7J I I I ¢ I I I EL a I I I y w , w ¢ wJ I I I coo cD 3 wp I • IN ww a w o a mw ¢ I ��♦ loal oy fi o w wC3 tw lia , I L I = f X \ II Ikkkk k k k X k �� gw g k k + I N o Z N7 w x 3i1 } } xx > XX X O k X /VN II x a �w 11 I 1 X k x� I i rym" A X X w� I XX x / + qan I 1 I / i 0o I 11 �4- X X X v° -F / 1 1 OWL �`° Xzom II 1 11 w ----ww ° 1 I ° 5 X /° a AMA e' i I \ oiev icv ❑ i ° `\\ • �1 I ' I ' iz82- I I I I I I I Z O H U D N F (n Z OQ LLJ 00 I� 6uooy} :Aq panDS {SDI WdS£:Z — LIOZ '61 "r Packet Pg. 167 I 2.2.a I W M Z ti N L6 N d W (0 V/ r W Z 'ON {Da!oad dllIW811S LS l LLOZ -b6 90 9iA02130�13H03 0001 AsP��b' LL -E00 -986 `gam Issy Wtb•Sleeu BUBD rasa s rsa wa I prMMM e6s99er sZr : DJ ees9 9er sZr eDuw Wf'N � O atosc 8 d L8 pe)pego aleDg .PaA v 1OZ86 uo{Bu!ysDM'{{a�an3 :pyl a{!nS'anua —jA auuoyq •MYZL I WrIA 6UIUUDId L2138WfIN 3NOHd 1N3f10 R8 pauBlsaa �" {ueW9BDUr)vq {De[ad 98086 VM `OOOMNNAI wf')1 aI�S .Z�H dfilyL t �l BUU88U16U3 MI0 ® ® ® ONtlI 4 S S S HIB l WOV 'a w eja SNOISIA3N Wvv Wa!10 II11 , n 111 it " - IIII. ■ - JCI - • I 08 ■ el: HNN 1111. I:�I Il: 'III 1�I II - i�O�G►G�`�c Not 000►':. iGOG►00i. SIN 1441 i►. o000o 1111511 rl p o.►000. o.►N .0►0►G►0PG O0R1,0IF "I 'iQ' 9592.2:89 E►:►BBEa• O. 1► O ► .1 q� Ski J a W 0 LLI U Z W LL J_ Cn Z 0000o m oo° y rn N O tJ WO w V1 OU W Z o C O wO mxz o 3 , O Z Z O o �¢¢ tna aowW qa <4 vi ¢¢ ~ a Ow o O �O ton O ,a.!�+n�, w ,w56 o oaoo�a �w m �o o w ¢p o z f- wx O� a �o �z F x z_ o z Z O a N O J~ W¢ N ¢gw n awz oz wzx z, z z D U w o �c~i �z w ow wo-n �o a zmo �o ¢�2w m w } o o x a s Wo mwa mN So5oo, Z U� }wom w m� oL o z_ o ��++ o'� m �m 6m �w wx atximoN z- 0¢a2 ¢ o ¢� w2 W I x m¢ �nO U mK J 7 0 Z= W F x VI Q w J W O N J O N W Z Z U O ~ W Z ¢ a w zao coiw a zIII: 0 omw a o aw mppm o c i = Fa Zm o zm = U W 0 ¢ W w > V j to � 3~ a w x ¢ Z U W I U N F O J W O Q O x Z J W O Q w cxj F o w x U¢ O 7 I'U Q 0 w U m ¢ _ O W w o. z U W z¢ w5a 32 wz> J m �o w w aw ON zM mom¢ Jzz r''o m�¢rw o o wx mo U o Z x oa} OQ� O� O awa O �N ZO2ow ~ Z Wz om m Z 6 Zr5 �O W NN ZK Z a zx F NQ O m= ¢wmZz A z ow ~¢ z w J p we ww UZ ri12o ¢ttnn UwWo < Z zZQd S~a.Q� M d pC OcLo w H O F Z N O ax O O OU xW~ZJ xQ w�}zH w c¢Y UN HwWWo O a- UZ Q7 U w O J O w`W' t~tL x WW O W xWm HO aHgO¢ F x (AI mooxx O w U Z J U N W ~a x m U¢ Q x x IrZy Z J F w 1 O W S- Z 2 m N Z w o� w W ao 0 ¢ ~ p w U Z O w l a w ww'J as yQLLm Qz ��= mzmwx Z ILI No Ww W o a U �(Z-'J o-jQ Z og FJ 2�oKy pZ OWOHo 6 znLo ¢-ZFa U M 7m on Z z_ a Uz YK r¢ z N zw W ~ Uvl x W W-MW¢ I�+ 2a w0 Q 3 O m W wW Wr Z Or m0 J Z x on-, Z Z=zW o m g o 111 w H O Z m w O U Q o J O U O OO f- o 2 r W H 3 w vo�gW;W 0Z01' EroQw o wit oti ¢a G �Z zFa �o N �o 0 0 3 ¢z ¢ zo an �!Q a OFiC Q z OZJ J2 J JW> 20 f WN O U� W U'ZU_ U ZO O W�WKFW U'o 1K1.�II�tO/Ip �' = N Wo�Q ova a U o�ilU Ho z ww w w of �3 U_ wi Wmu x >v� . ZLLa FowGNm z > >¢¢ v1¢o3m a Wx ��¢ OF� z 0o z O m w¢ �O [i vl Jt=il PipI�, O W �tnawx> N ti zw3 F-wzo z mo woo w� O �w w �dZ z� caw x oa ¢Z $iN w ooN go as wxaF ¢ mQ oo ¢ Zo W oz mo zFr! of zzo ¢ w!5 }} 02 0O }z 2 >-� Z Z02 OQ-Q 2¢GI=JW 'T. Q a�� ¢xQtYO 6 �3 aW U' OJ U OF Z via- ¢zU GLO w O¢ WQ ¢¢ O K� Z%-C-i m w0 ZW�O(L 00 -Zw Zp W (Ya O Wd W� Wm U O mm x Z O K V O x Z J vI F w (L H a- W F J N W O O N > O W W x J m x x J W i }Q- a w¢ ooaro9 = o� zmzQ� �z QN¢o W= a¢ 3 uj Zz 9 ao� o' w4 9w 4 mWo m N Z O 3 w l 2 W 0 O O O ff\ U N} O O 68 m9 % m~ O 6 J o a O ma m 2 pan m, Dom ac 3 owro W z wvo ozoo o� w�a how Dzm o NJ o Qa ox NON ono X a� =w = U 2 K O ¢ w w m J¢ m ¢ W w 3 Z x o O y Z j O¢ x O w K w to m W OF W O ao E z m 2 o r w o ~a- JO xF WWO 7 0 00} Wm>wo mto a woz NON O xm o o K¢O E-z p x� myUW� F W w J K 1= o o w m Q m D- U Z W w x a F N or w ¢ U Z J Z J = N m = x> W m N N ww Z } F z !1F..�I CCzd �Z afYd;OQ w U ZZ Do'aOaO� aOJ aomw mo wm� OQ� O WKw .6 a � JZ OO ada Yw� Ow w� CW L<7 swoaw 5Qw gm�xWxNW z }O} p0a\' aWUaOr UO U UwU ��� 4] fN ¢g Na w2 oo2 a wlZ'a o �tnm w z1j F WW WSW WF WH 2W Dm J ¢L U U .a Mma �x �aJ7 (- zo 00 now ai=,w,a- z < ��E to-i3(LoDwon rzga rzz orz a w �o r ZZwo2 v0-i to rr to tna p¢o �x�w a O d m w- ci WFm ri a wx a rL mm J 'a 0 Y w co 0 z n LU z Z Z Q LU n U) D O Y N' I.f. U) O • U S-1 1`d13a OS31 3NVI SNrAN3f p U� (6 i M O W o a N o w I O W N I N U < x D Q N 0 O v z o F 0 Z x a w z V o J 3 w Z J U Z O U U 3 w � o z z w w N �Z Z N O ¢ MZ ) ms o 0 ZU ¢� W,w Oa w U O xZ 4 N �U o d U x0 W ¢o W z f W C N� Z F O x F J xm Nv S Q y>wj Z j x 0 m a �Fz O] fxw zQ QUZ �m w~ ax n0 �WW zow WU� zao }w 0 F Z aZZ U ¢ Q w U W Z�U fA oaf W oz� o w-a o00Jo z cw� U m U Z �zo w D H CD ~H OW Z JAW Z 0Wx o nzw J poi �n WW kj Z Z w O d SON n j Wn K w w o ¢ W - O Z¢ 0 0 Q Z O O,,g> X p w 2 z LLJ W w xn 0 WSW O 0 =twn o wa o v to 0 Nz U MZ xowo w, ,oa Zaa mIy>o�Wa FOFWWQ P.Zj Jylj00 N x m> 0- Z¢ QQ0 S U w a' W �po zowoi Vl¢aaa¢ x O N x m w z w N a o 5QQ¢, ~sww szz�N Q w N B p O a Z N w K w a d N O w N N~ J¢ J m z H w 0 F5 aozx o owa w z 0!�10 ZOm UdZ F N~ K -0tn0 HN OJ N� W Vl¢ZW ZJoZ zz z 201=i Z0 6.06 Q aaw. V: ~ z H W 0 0W.NN x a m N wzwzo 22%N < Q!¢ Q(Q(nnoom bra O WaWaN. wZ Z_ Z}mNm ♦Y m K a W w p N O} O J f1 om0- llisw zOW< Ow O }a}¢Wo }Mowx Z NpZN a'ZOZ xfmOJ O ZNpJow OwZU 03WxM 5zow �mIm mOFmm Z �� J ~ CO N W O J x W x J W x 2 G 90, ¢V)a V) ¢x¢V)w I� 6uooy{ :A8 PanDS }SDI Wd8£Z - Ll0Z '61 'Ir Packet Pg. 168 cV Pi a J_ w x w U O M Z J Z x N O W O Y O m x > Wz ZH_- ¢ x M OJ UO on am QNx a W O O O} x O N z ¢ W W W Z Z Z- 0 O O W W JJJ x J i W I Z m O n ¢ U O O W O O ¢ O 88,0 w J 3 m W m m O< a J } W 2 m o r U U g U W >L> N W w o U O d O W O} W ¢ U x r .w--•.~ � o F- x F 2 ¢ J K H U a W r 7 0 Y w? w ¢ W Q ~ m p Q x¢ w 2 W W O J U W¢ U O J Z N H N J Z W x w N on xLLp� ¢x � m o x �x 1<5wa5 xa� ovl v =oa ~x,g, ¢ x mJ xo2W¢Jwz v, ow¢ mw vZ 0--- O a m= J Z H Q U >> O W Q w K a x 0 X Vl H Z Z Y QUQ > �= Q w ¢ Z 2 0� 0 Z N Z w J� Z 3 ¢ U w H m O W¢ j J-¢ J f O 0 0 N x W a } w to y Z Y O- m� W 0 Z o~ �� mo O a N N x U O ¢ J Q Q¢ N J O Z QUA K== a 2QxQ ZzwZ Z UW a rF 16i mwg x xg, U Zf N- N O t�Wj aOxx <T -D w N a O Q O v Q r m x N J� 7 ~O ¢ 2 ,x„ 2 m o V m Q (n O O J a O U' } Z N z uw) 3¢ 8 o, z , W. J 7 Z W J vl O� w Z ¢ 3 3 ¢ o¢ N Z W W as m a J W OJ J x W 3 m s W W m W a U ~ m } 2 O O U m ¢ J W W Z - W w O K w m a on O w 2� a w � Z N tl x Q O W= Nj t45O�1 U (( ann W 7�W zO2d 02WW Ug2HH ¢'� U WZjU ¢Wx �$�m N QQONF 3� NOmNQtZnNUX op FO �N (qtQOnn=N K OZ2 aaQ'ZFw w(n Z VI ¢wOZ No Z OJtOz Woa Z Jv, Z xo~ Z } w O JMwOQ26�ZWZw �jx SQZQ IVQw¢ O W. �++¢vi� JOJ020 w>oz- dE 96 �9,wy Z,wi ZUN ¢ ¢ owx w=wm Z W away Wa3QJ O Wm m taLJ W H W J O Z O m_ F a a J N O ¢ M O x F U Nt¢n O ¢ ^x O U� O W x F- o 6 w m~ m x x m O Z O > O J N asa O O W 0 U r� 2 N N w x wZ w J 0 x w U C¢9 O Z Q W U Q 7 2 0 3 ~ ¢> d ¢ x F U w m J J N w 0 V1 m W N m O U O x K Z N xtnz oc¢ia owzx zr -Ew Ww~i OF z_"o-Q IWWWWJa3 �.-.} o zm� aawo wz �=Z wa Qo_ ��¢Ww wN Vozw o W o ovaaa DoNzw N�¢m UWxOF QH Zj O¢�w ¢0 wpa x WQW U00� mH NO mwQw=mFr� oFw =zUO p¢d�N Za oZU zWwx wgama Z004m Ug a� 5xmowz WJw VDU a wJJO} WNo0 OVffi om 6o^ONw02 Z_ Np HRZx ImQp= mm Mii Z w 0 m FS G N O Z O i N U U W w N W Z 0 ¢ g N ¢ Z W w ¢ x V1 m W U U w N x fxn X 5 o a o m O }m O ma O Z¢ W N m W O too wmw am,;i xa,nN 52WR, oo xo ¢t¢z x zwa ov~is a zacw� w�am az �'Fo �¢za,L oaf Ja Wwsw m izm� moo, 2 O x Z 2 x w x d z a a{� U 2 N U F-¢ O x f U W O 0 O o x O_ } - J O O m o Q U> V)U c x Z W Z t7n g N w¢ z Z W M o ��> m Z O o w 2 w o x to y Z w a J W~ a Z m to U Q W U w l N i W i= a w o m N W ~-¢ W r W 41 } 0 W O- O }} Q )F J Sx w x i¢ O W N- U w W w �(=/IW oz 2-5- zR2 1 4 twn n6m -OJ WU ,x,1xWFUM KI Qm UZ m QQW a7HV) U UxN Y03�1i¢amwN vl UffiwZNw> aQOZZ �N 2 Jao vn-xz HO m Z ¢moo- Om mx NOo6z< oow 2x0 J ttz �mc7a 4z I oO xwxMowOaO? ,yax,y��¢ ¢>gBo ripam oz id}w UZ(nw w w to toOxW N fQ JZm aUJUxf mZN Ja0 2 WJJ JjZO ZU Z o ZNOJO8NwxW WZ Z,,Z, OOW xWWW NO ¢ Q Q , O O- x 0 w O W ¢ o o Z > N W N a H awwm C 02 aw a.N*., w H JOx 7O oU¢ Nx 3tanxw �WY li N y ~NZ ¢OOJ zO FKK Q NtoxxUm2U F F¢ WQ Kria=W riU (}n }xJ m O m o a o o N o j,a,, a } a t<¢ a m Q y Nn w¢ O w ~g W N UO JQ U Q m Z- O m ¢ w x 6cI Q 2 w? Z wQ J N z K= = w a= }¢ a¢ m U U U 3 F Z Z~ W a 2 W U x O W w z o K K o a J lL ¢ E C cx9 ¢ K N j 2 o 7 o x w w m o K x W 3 K N Z O Z a > a Q m 6 a w5o d o- c�3 oa J ^OJ ¢\NO OO~a= aUZWUx oZ x VOI zUzj3V7 NQ UmZ a Zawx UNOU �a a. WOZO� } O coin aQJ� 00 xN �N U W J W �+ VI F¢O xp }N ¢ a N M �mV) 0 0 ¢ H O WNg¢ Owrz ZW�r w 0W ¢xti�xJ WJow o �o wo a� g �z N o�o�o o� o ox ww aM WJ o xM�n>o xNw¢ o�z ? �aZZN a-i= boa>x3w¢ Yww� cix ooc�i,,i tOi,�Wa w� zgm Xc¢iQzQxNwaysna 3� o}z W�oNZ w ow¢ �°d J m- D_ W O w W o z U w Z U a Z I J~ J¢¢ V O U o 0 3 Q~ W J Z Z N¢ W O_ a 7 W U Q OQ Z} W U O J a i a W O> Q a W O¢ a O¢ x JJJ x i i i x¢ Q dma xxx¢ m ZU xaU OZ Jw Jr� OOOZ J¢ H}x JJWW w� SaNO 2UxW¢ JJ Wa0 J¢Q¢�NNUN2a w� wMiw ¢3HCC NN w MJ¢ aFaZ FOwmN HU¢aU0 ¢O ¢tn LLwxwW Nma ¢GN F¢ F¢?2 �¢o ca NW w* N M 4 in 10 n m m � 4 Ld tD m m z z O H U DN NO z 00 Ld �� U_O r M V H 0 Cr 0 0� c N � � L 3 3 0 Y 00 N O O 0 N Z J a c O N O J LL, J In c w Y �, m W J CD o � v N tn� T 0 a � N J z w z d v r E ri � W U W ¢ W w Z ci > o o <0 J a o �p Q = W � � cwo � � a ¢ W �Z �3 o- Qw m 0 }U /0 0 O Jm ii 3 x ¢Q d w � � oz a � K' voi a a � tOii ; y�� w w z W QJQ x Z m K X Z Z � O N � W W Q� N Q O Q K W O J N Z a� i( tlQo o W o W W Z F FF ¢C yr x U O N U N i >>m O ZJ Gi oN o a$ E d! Z� x F O Z O V ?�Nw � a g� � o x� W O W 2 y.1 ¢xa N �� Q W¢ m J J m W m W r cJ�NaQ ? wa toG�`N tri 2.2.a APPENDIX 2B SWPPP PROJECT SUMMARY a Jenkins Lane Drainage Report Packet Pg. 169 2.2.a PROJECT TEAM MEMBERS: Title Certified Erosion & Sediment Control Lead Name(s) TBD Phone Number TBD Resident Engineer Ken McIntyre (425) 486-6533 Emergency Ecology Contact Puget Sound Office (425) 649-7000 Emergency Owner Contact TBD TBD Non -Emergency Ecology Contact Northwest Region (425) 649-7000 Monitoring Personnel TBD TBD MONITORING PERSONNEL TO BE ASSIGNED AT THE PRE -CONSTRUCTION MEETING AND ADDED TO THE TABLE ABOVE ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE: • Construction Start Date TBD • Install ESC Measures TBD • Construction End Date TBD CONSTRUCTION BMP LIST: • High Visibility Plastic or Metal Fence (BMP C103) • Silt Fence (BMP C233) • Storm Drain Inlet Protection (BMP C220) • Detention Pond Or Vault • Plastic Covering (BMP C123) • Topsoiling (BMP C125) • Dust Control (BMP C140) • Early application of gravel base on areas to be paved • Temporary and Permanent Seeding (BMP C120) • Interceptor Dike and Swale (BMP C200) • Materials on Hand (BMP C150) may also be applicable • Grass -Lined Channels (BMP C201) • Check Dams (BMP C207) • Straw Wattles (BMP C235) Jenkins Lane Drainage Report Packet Pg. 170 2.2.a APPENDIX 2C ALTERNATIVE BMPs Jenkins Lane Drainage Report Packet Pg. 171 2.2.a The following includes a list of possible alternative BMPs for each of the 12 elements not described in the main SWPPP text. This list can be referenced in the event a BMP for a specific element is not functioning as designed and an alternative BMP needs to be implemented. Element #1 - Mark Clearing Limits • High Visibility Plastic or Metal Fence (BMP C103) Element #2 - Establish Construction Access • Wheel Wash (BMP C106) Element #3 - Control Flow Rates • (none) Element #4 - Install Sediment Controls • Straw Bale Barrier (BMP C230) • Vegetated Strip (BMP C234) • Materials on Hand (BMP C150) Element #5 - Stabilize Soils • Dust Control (BMP C140) • Topsoiling (BMP C125) • Sodding (BMP C124) Element #6 - Protect Slopes • Straw Wattles (BMP C235) • Grass -Lined Channels (BMP C201) Element #7 - Protect Drain Inlets • (none) Element #8 - Stabilize Channels and Outlets • Level Spreader (BMP C206) Element #10 - Control Dewatering • (none) Jenkins Lane Drainage Report Packet Pg. 172 2.2.a APPENDIX 2D GENERAL PERMIT 00 N O O r O N Z J d C O .y 7 r O J d LL d C J N C Y C N N N C N E t V R Q t 3 O a m r z x w r c m E a Jenkins Lane Drainage Report Packet Pg. 173 2.2.a Construction Stormwater General Permit A copy of the construction stormwater general permit will be added to this appendix once it is obtained. Jenkins Lane Drainage Report Packet Pg. 174 2.2.a APPENDIX 2E SITE LOG & INSPECTION FORMS Jenkins Lane Drainage Report Packet Pg. 175 2.2.a Site Insoection Forms (and Site Lo The results of each inspection shall be summarized in an inspection report or checklist that is entered into or attached to the site log book. It is suggested that the inspection report or checklist be included in this appendix to keep monitoring and inspection information in one document, but this is optional. However, it is mandatory that this SWPPP and the site inspection forms be kept onsite at all times during construction, and that inspections be performed and documented as outlined below. At a minimum, each inspection report or checklist shall include: a. Inspection date/times b. Weather information: general conditions during inspection, approximate amount of precipitation since the last inspection, and approximate amount of precipitation within the last 24 hours. c. A summary or list of all BMPs that have been implemented, including observations of all erosion/sediment control structures or practices. d. The following shall be noted: i. Locations of BMPs inspected, ii. Locations of BMPs that need maintenance, iii. The reason maintenance is needed iv. Locations of BMPs that failed to operate as designed or intended, and V. Locations where additional or different BMPs are needed, and the reason(s) why. e. A description of stormwater discharged from the site. The presence of suspended sediment, turbid water, discoloration, and/or oil sheen shall be noted, as applicable. f. A description of any water quality monitoring performed during inspection, and the results of that monitoring. g. General comments and notes, including a brief description of any BMP r repairs, maintenance or installations made as a result of the inspection. h. A statement that, in the judgment of the person conducting the site inspection, the site is either in compliance or out of compliance with the terms and conditions of the SWPPP and the NPDES permit. If the site inspection indicates that the site is out of compliance, the inspection report shall include a summary of the remedial actions required to bring the site back into compliance, as well as a schedule of implementation. i. Name, title, and signature of person conducting the site inspection; and the following statement: "I certify under penalty of law that this report is true, accurate, and complete, to the best of my knowledge and belief'. When the site inspection indicates that the site is not in compliance with any terms and conditions of the NPDES permit, the Permittee shall take immediate action(s) to: stop, contain, and clean up the unauthorized discharges, or otherwise stop the noncompliance; correct the problem(s); implement appropriate Best Management Practices (BMPs), and/or conduct maintenance of existing BMPs; and achieve compliance with all applicable standards and permit conditions. In addition, if the noncompliance causes a threat to human health or the environment, the Permittee shall comply with the Noncompliance Notification requirements in Special Condition S55 of the permit. Jenkins Lane Drainage Report Packet Pg. 176 2.2.a Site Inspection Form General Information Project Name: Inspector Name: Title: CESCL # : Date: Time: Inspection Type: ❑ After a rain event ❑ Weekly ❑ Turbidity/transparency benchmark exceedance ❑ Other Weather Precipitation Since last inspection In last 24 hours Description of General Site Conditions: Inspection of BMPs Element 1: Mark Clearing Limits BMP: Location Inspected Functioning Problem/Corrective Action Y N Y N NIP Location Inspected FunctionNIP ing Problem/Corrective Action Element 2: Establish Construction Access BMP: Location Inspected F nctii ning Problem/Corrective Action NIP Location Inspected ing Problem/Corrective Action Yunlcvtio NIP Jenkins Lane Drainage Report Packet Pg. 177 2.2.a Element 3: Control F/owrates BMP: Location Inspected Functionin Problem/Corrective Action Yj NJ Y N NIP :8a Location Ins F nctio ing Problem/Corrective Action lected NIP Element 4: Install Sediment Controls BMP: Location Inspected Functioning Problem/Corrective Action Y N Y N NIP Location Ins io ing Problem/Corrective Action lected YunN NIP Element 5: Stabilize Soils BMP: Location Inspected Functioning Problem/Corrective Action Y N Y N NIP Location Ins ing Problem/Corrective Action lected Yunctio NIP Jenkins Lane Drainage Report Packet Pg. 178 2.2.a Element 6: Protect Slopes BMP: Location Inspected Functionin Problem/Corrective Action Yj NJ Y N NIP :8a Location Ins F nctio ing Problem/Corrective Action lected NIP Element 7: Protect Drain Inlets BMP: Location Inspected Functioning Problem/Corrective Action Y N Y N NIP Location Ins io ing Problem/Corrective Action lected YunN NIP Element 8: Stabilize Channels and Outlets BMP: Location Inspected Functioning Problem/Corrective Action Y N Y N NIP Location Ins ing Problem/Corrective Action lected Yunctio NIP Jenkins Lane Drainage Report Packet Pg. 179 2.2.a Element 9: Control Pollutants BMP: Location Inspected Functionin Problem/Corrective Action Yj NJ Y N NIP :8a Location Ins F nctio ing Problem/Corrective Action lected NIP Element 10: Control Dewatering BMP: Location Inspected Functioning Problem/Corrective Action Y N Y N NIP Location Ins io ing Problem/Corrective Action lected YunN NIP Stormwater Discharges From the Site Observed? Problem/Corrective Action Y N Location Turbidity Discoloration Sheen Location Turbidity Discoloration Sheen Jenkins Lane Drainage Report Packet Pg. 180 2.2.a Water Quality Monitoring Was any water quality monitoring conducted? ❑ Yes ❑ No If water quality monitoring was conducted, record results here: If water quality monitoring indicated turbidity 250 NTU or greater; or transparency 6 cm or less, was Ecology notified by phone within 24 hrs? ❑ Yes ❑ No If Ecology was notified, indicate the date, time, contact name and phone number below: Date: Time: Contact Name: Phone #: General Comments and Notes Include BMP repairs, maintenance, or installations made as a result of the inspection. Were Photos Taken? u Yes u No If photos taken, describe photos below: 00 N O O r O N Z J a. C 0 .y 2 r 0 J as ii m J N C c CD N N C N E t V R Q t 3 0 a m r z x w r c m E M a Jenkins Lane Drainage Report Packet Pg. 181 2.2.a SECTION 3 SOURCE CONTROL OF POLLUTION Jenkins Lane Drainage Report Packet Pg. 182 2.2.a Source Control of Pollution The project is not classified as a high -use site, and no hazardous materials requiring source control BMPs are proposed to be stored on -site. Jenkins Lane Drainage Report Packet Pg. 183 2.2.a SECTION 4 PRESERVATION OF NATURAL DRAINAGE SYSTEMS AND OUTFALLS Jenkins Lane Drainage Report Packet Pg. 184 2.2.a PRESERVATION OF NATURAL DRAINAGE SYSTEMS AND OUTFALLS The existing site topography falls towards north into 131" Way SW, and the runoff is collected into an underground conveyance system. Eventually the stormwater heads north where it ultimately discharges into Willow Creek. The project is proposing the use of drywells on each lot which will infiltrate the roof runoff into the native soil below. The roadways will be treated by a stormwater media filter before enter an infiltration facility located at the entrance of the subdivision underneath Road `A'. The remaining runoff will bypass detention and will be collected into the existing conveyance along 13t" Way SW where it will connect with the existing flowpath. The project will maintain the historic flowpath and is not expected to adversely impact drainage features further downstream. Jenkins Lane Drainage Report Packet Pg. 185 2.2.a SECTION 5 ON -SITE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT Jenkins Lane Drainage Report Packet Pg. 186 2.2.a Existing Site Hydrology The project site is a developed lot occupying approximately 0.83 acres. The site consists of one existing single family residence, additional storage structures, driveway, and trees located throughout the site. The underlying topography falls moderately to the north, and surface runoff can be expected to drain northernly via sheet flow towards 13th Way W along the south side of the roadway. For stormwater modeling purposes, the site is considered to be fully forested in the existing condition. Developed Site Hydrology The project proposes the construction of 5 single family residential lots, and aims to maintain similar drainage patterns to those that currently exist. The project is proposing an access road branching off from 13th Way SW that will allow vehicle access for each single family home with its associated driveways. Roof runoff will be infiltrated by drywell facilities located on each lot. Any overflow from the drywells will be routed north onto 13th Way SW where it will be collected into the existing conveyance system The access road and driveways will be treated by a stormwater media filter before being routed into an infiltration facility located in the northeast corner of the property. Any overflow either the water quality vault or the infiltration facility will be routed towards 13th Way SW where it will be collected by the existing conveyance system. It is not feasible to collect all of the proposed impervious area along the frontage due to grade. Per Department of Ecology's flow control requirements, the remaining runoff will bypass detention and will flow north away from the project site into 13th Way SW where it will ultimately discharge into Willow Creek. Basin figures have been provided in Appendix 5A of this report. Performance Standards The project is subject to the provisions of Chapter 18.30 of the 2017 City of Edmonds' Stormwater Code Supplement to Edmonds Community Develop Code, which is supplemented from the Washington State Department of Ecology's (DOE) 2005 Stormwater Manual for Western Washington (SMMWW). Hydrologic modeling calculations for flow control and water quality treatment design were performed using MGS Flood. MGSFIood is a general, continuous, rainfall -runoff computer model developed specifically for stormwater facility design in Western Washington. MGSFIood evaluates several decades of hydrologic data to derive peak flowrate and duration information. Low Impact Development (LID) Evaluation The City of Edmonds' Stormwater Code Supplement requires the evaluation of low -impact stormwater management solutions as part of the stormwater management design. The three types of surfaces on the project site are the following: lawn/landscape, roof, and roadway ("other hard surfaces"). A table evaluating each type of surface is provided in the following page. For the lawn and landscaped areas, post -construction soil quality and depth will be in accordance with BMP T5.13. For the roof, a downspout full infiltration system is feasible and will be in accordance to BMP T5.10A. The drywell will be placed within the rear of each lot where it will manage its own respective roof. The geotechnical report provided test pits in the aforementioned area and provided an infiltration rate of 3 inches per hour in advance outwash sand. In the event if the drywells overflows, the stormwater will head north into 13th Way SW and collected into the existing conveyance system. Jenkins Lane Drainage Report Packet Pg. 187 2.2.a For the roadway, an infiltration trench will be incorporated to increase the effective flow rate in conjunction of a treatment facility. This is not an option for the "Other Hard Surfaces" per the City of Edmonds' Stormwater Code; however infiltration is the preferred low -impact stormwater management solution and the geotechnical engineer provided an infiltration rate of 11.5in/hr. Typically infiltration facilities reduce the peak flows which allows sediments to be suspended to be treated by the native subsoil. However a high infiltration rate may not provide adequate time in the removal of pollutants from the stormwater. Per Section SSC-4 Soil Infiltration Rate/Drawdown Time of the SWMMWW, an infiltration facility cannot be used for treatment purposes for infiltration rates greater than 9 inches per hour. Since the infiltration trench will not be used for water quality treatment purposes, a media filter vault will be provided to meet those requirements. Additional information regarding the water quality and flow control design for the infiltration trench will be provided in Appendix 6 and 7 respectively. On -site BMP Surface (Manual Feasibility Analysis Reference Post -Construction Lawn & Soil Quality & FEASIBLE — The slopes on the project site were not greater than 33 Landscape Depth percent, and therefore this option is feasible for the lawn & landscape. (BMP T5.13) Full Dispersion (BMP T5.30) FEASIBLE — Per the geotechnical report, the soil characteristics on the - or - Downspout Full lots are suitable to fully infiltrate the roofs. Infiltration BMP T5.10A NOT FEASIBLE — Due to the existing at -grade soil characteristics, Roofs Bioretention other low -impact stormwater management solutions, including (Vol. V, Ch. 7) bioretention and rainwater harvesting, bioretention facilities are not feasible. Downspout Dispersion NOT FEASIBLE — Not enough room for minimum vegetative flowpath (BMP T5.10B) length. Full Dispersion NOT FEASIBLE — This BMP requires 65% of the site to be protected in (BMP T5.30) a native (forested) condition. Permeable Pavement NOT FEASIBLE — Due to the high infiltration rate, permeable pavement Other (BMP T5.15) will not provide water quality treatment for the pavement runoff. Hard Surfaces Bioretention NOT FEASIBLE — Due to the existing grade, bioretention is not feasible (Vol. V, Ch. 7) due to the amount of depth required to capture all of the pavement runoff. Sheet Flow Dispersion NOT FEASIBLE — Not enough room for minimum vegetative flowpath (BMP T5.12) length. Jenkins Lane Drainage Report Packet Pg. 188 2.2.a APPENDIX 5A BASIN MAPPING Jenkins Lane Drainage Report Packet Pg. 189 I I J I I2� � vv so a 1 `�r2 I ❑ 16' .24P p' 14' P 11• 18'p PP18'P �. 18'p 24' 1. 24' ' p p P p. P ��CCll" p VV 18 OM p12• 16' \ a c z. c -�4• \ , ` C S14 r — P f0 � P ° 22' P P / 18i s / L �14 "0 RIM / I 56CG -280.J1 /--SSI 0 CB RAY=1]9.91 / 10' S6 ESNf PFR r E 4: CMP(5)-2]&06 4' CPP(E)-1IBJ8 / // l %' P u�. 00 Cr I� C � i/ s I _ 2z' L C w I I I I S BASIN SUMMARY n) r TOTAL BASIN AREA = 0.84 AC i� (ASSUMED TO BE FULLY FORESTED FOR HYDROLOGIC MODELING PURPOSES) a� c rn o C J a oV) m� a� C/)o a J s_ a� rn ° �Q) L f U W KJM ro pn Clvll En tneerin N rn K Drawn ® ® ® Project Management a N 'o 6/9/17 Date Planning 1724 W. Marine View Drive, Suite 140; Everett, Washington 98201 li 186- 003- 17 Office: 425.486.6533 Fax: 425.486.6593 w saaengineers.com Ir Project No. N W E 0 50 a 1 ,=50, Scale Feet JENKINS LANE 1 -50' Scale EXISTING HYDROLOGIC CONDITIONS Packet Pg. 190 n. 0 6,121 SF I I / D i6 SF N N I J PROJECT BASIN SUMMARY L a TOTAL PROJECT BASIN AREA = 0.79 AC L� m TOTAL LOT AREA = 0.71 AC i MAX BLDG COVERAGE AREA = 0.25 AC (35% OF TOTAL LOT AREA) L EFFECTIVE PROJECT BASIN AREA = 0.54 AC % ROOF AREAS WILL BE INFILTRATED ON EACH 3 INDIVIDUAL LOT, SO ROOF AREAS ARE REMOVED FROM THE DRAINAGE MODEL. a� (EFFECTIVE AREA = BASIN AREA - BLDG COVERAGE AREA) c s J PAVEMENT AREA = 0.05 AC o v) DRIVEWAY AREA = 0.09 AC = Y (ASSUME 750 SF/LOT) ~ a� TOTAL IMPERVIOUS SURFACE = 0.14 AC �v m a r- LANDSCAPE/LAWN AREA = 0.40 AC a� 1n o 0 a L J N m� a- Ln �w v I KJM De n BYPASS BASIN 6,360 SF Q O PROJECT I BASIN / 6.067 SF J L___ BYPASS BASIN TOTAL BASIN AREA = PAVEMENT AREA = LANDSCAPE/LAWN AREA = p KAMI CI N Drawn ®®®A Engineering Project management "J Planning C' 6/9/17 1724 W. Marine Yew Drive, Suite 140; Everett, Washington 98201 N o Date 186- 003- 17 Office: 425.466.6533 Fax: 425.486.6593 w .soaengineers.com Project No. �m 0.05 AC 0.03 AC 0.02 AC N 0 50 1 "=50' Scale Feet JENKINS LANE PROPOSED HYDROLOGIC CONDITIONS 1'-50' Scale Packet Pg. 191 2.2.a SECTION 6 RUNOFF TREATMENT Jenkins Lane Drainage Report Packet Pg. 192 2.2.a RUNOFFTREATMENT The project is subject to Basic Treatment requirements, as outlined by Minimum Requirement #6 in the DOE's SWMMWW. The project is proposing to fully infiltrate roof runoff into drywells located on each property, and therefore does not need to provide water quality treatment as it is not considered as PGIS. The driveways will be graded to have surface runoff flow towards the proposed access road. The proposed roadways will make-up the pollution -generating surfaces on the project. Per Section SSC-4 Soil Infiltration Rate/Drawdown Time of the SWMMWW, an infiltration facility cannot be used for treatment purposes for infiltration rates greater than 9 inches per hour. Therefore the runoff from the roadways will be collected at the entrance of Road `A' and conveyed to a stormfilter vault where it will be treated by a BayFilter cartridge. Once the stormwater has been treated, it is routed into the infiltration facility to percolate into the native soil. Hydrologic calculations of the peak flows for the stormwater BayFilter are provided in Appendix 6A. Jenkins Lane Drainage Report Packet Pg. 193 2.2.a APPENDIX 6A WATER QUALITY DESIGN CALCULATIONS Jenkins Lane Drainage Report Packet Pg. 194 2.2.a Water Quality Design Calculations Water Quality Data - inf Trench Water Quality Data Flow Splitter Calculator J Compute Water Quality Treatment Volume for Link Computed Basic Wet Pond Volume, 91 % Exceedance (cu-ft): 581. Computed Large Wet Pond Volume [Phosphorous Control], 1.5'Basic Volume (cu-ft): 872. Time to Infiltrate 91 % Treatment Volume, [Applies to Infiltration Facilities] 4.21 hr Compute Infiltration/Filtration Statistics Total Runoff Volume 55.40 ac-f Percent Treated -71 (Infiltrated+Filtered)/Total 100.00' Total Runoff Infiltrated 55.40 ac-ft 100.00' Total Runoff Filtered 0.00 ac-ft 0.00' ... Compute 2-yr Discharge Rate for Link Outflow (cis) 0.600 ... Compute Water Quality 15-Minute Design Discharge for Link Inflow On -Line Facility Design Discharge Rake (cfs): F0.019 Off -Line Facility Design Discharge Rate (cfs): 0.010 I � Close Bayfilter Cartridge Treatment Capacity = 11.25 gpm = 0.025 cfs Minimum # of Required Bayfilter Cartridges = 0.02 cfs / 0.025 cfs = 0.8 cartridges (1 cartridge) Jenkins Lane Drainage Report Packet Pg. 195 2.2.a SECTION 7 FLOW CONTROL a Jenkins Lane Drainage Report Packet Pg. 196 2.2.a FLOW CONTROL The project is subject to Basic Treatment requirements, as outlined by Minimum Requirement #7 in the DOE's SWMMWW. Flow control for this project will be provided with the use of drywells for the roof runoff and an infiltration facility for the driveway and access road. The drywells will collect and infiltrate the roof runoff underground to meet flow control requirements. Each lot will have two drywells that will manage its own respective roof, and will be placed within each lot. The drywell facilities will be prescriptively sized per Section 3.1.1 of the 2014 SMMWW to ensure that the develop rates match the predeveloped rates. Per the geotechnical report, medium sands were found on the lots and will be utilized to formally size the drywells. The drywell sizing selection is provided in Appendix 7A of this report. An infiltration facility, a StormTech Chamber, will be implemented to detain and infiltrate the roadway runoff. StormTech Chambers are a modular semicircle structures which can be used to construct an underground storage reservoir for stormwater. The perimeter of the facility will be lined by an impermeable liner with the bottom layered covered in crushed stone. The StormTech Chamber is placed above the crushed stone and is backfilled with embedment stone. The StormTech system was designed for parking lots and is capable of withstanding vehicle loading. After the stormwater is treated, it is routed into the void space created between the crushed stone and StormTech Chamber where it is detained and infiltrated into the native soil beneath. Any overflow from the infiltration facility will back up into the water quality vault, and have stormwater surge onto the roadway flowing north towards 13t" Way SW. The infiltration facility was modeled in MGSFIood to ensure that the amount of area was capable of infiltrating 100% of the runoff. An infiltration rate of 11.50 inches per hour was modeled per the geotechnical report. The MGSFIood calculations are provided in Appendix 713 of this report. It is not feasible to collect and treat all the access road and the impervious area along the frontage due to grade. This area is less than 5,000 square feet and will be considered as bypass. Its surface runoff will head east and will be captured by the existing conveyance system located on 13t" Way SW. Basin mapping that depicts the existing and proposed hydrologic conditions are provided in Appendix 5A Jenkins Lane Drainage Report Packet Pg. 197 2.2.a APPENDIX 7A FLOW CONTROL DESIGN CALCULATIONS Jenkins Lane Drainage Report Packet Pg. 198 2.2.a Drywell Prescriptive Sizing Selection Per BM T5.10A: • The drywell must contain at least 90 cubic feet of gravel per 1,000 square feet of impervious surface for medium sands. • Drywells must be at least 48 inches in diameter. • Spacing between drywells must be a minimum of 10 feet. Prescriptive Design Size of drywells: Largest Lot Area on Project Site = 6,360 square feet Maximum Building Coverage = 2,226 square feet (Per Edmonds City Code, RS-6 — 35%) Minimum Volume of Drywell = ( 2,226 sqft / 1000 sqft ) x 90 cf = 200 cubic feet of gravel Drywell Design Selection: Two (2) - 6'x6'x6' Drywells for each lot Volume of Selected Drywells: 2 x 216 cf = 432 cubic feet Jenkins Lane Drainage Report Packet Pg. 199 2.2.a Infiltration Facility Flood Control Calculations Pre -Developed Basin Schematic: r Developed Basin Schematic: = vi=v; va=ii Inf Trend Jenkins Lane Drainage Report Packet Pg. 200 2.2.a MGS FLOOD PROJECT REPORT Program Version: MGSFlood 4.40 Program License Number: 201110001 Project Simulation Performed on: 06/12/2017 3:24 PM Report Generation Date: 06/12/2017 3:24 PM Input File Name: Project Name: Analysis Title: Comments: 2017-06-12 Infiltration Calcs.fld Jenkins Lane Infiltration Facility Design PRECIPITATION INPUT Computational Time Step (Minutes): 15 Extended Precipitation Time Series Selected Climatic Region Number: 0 Full Period of Record Available used for Routing Precipitation Station : 96003605 Puget East 36 in_5min 10/01/1939-10/01/2097 Evaporation Station 961036 Puget East 36 in MAP Evaporation Scale Factor : 0.750 HSPF Parameter Region Number: 1 HSPF Parameter Region Name : USGS Default ********** Default HSPF Parameters Used (Not Modified by User) **********************WATERSHED DEFINITION *********************** Predevelopment/Post Development Tributary Area Summary Predeveloped Post Developed Total Subbasin Area (acres) 0.840 0.540 Area of Links that Include Precip/Evap (acres) 0.000 0.000 Total (acres) 0.840 0.540 ----------------------SCENARIO: PREDEVELOPED Number of Subbasins: 1 ---------- Subbasin : Subbasin 1---------- ------- Area (Acres)-------- Outwash Forest 0.840 ---------------------------------------------- Subbasin Total 0.840 ----------------------SCENARIO: POSTDEVELOPED Number of Subbasins: 1 ---------- Subbasin : Project Basin ---------- ------- Area (Acres)-------- Outwash Grass 0.400 Impervious 0.140 ---------------------------------------------- Subbasin Total 0.540 ************************* LINK DATA ******************************* ----------------------SCENARIO: PREDEVELOPED Number of Links: 0 ************************* LINK DATA ******************************* NARIO:POSTDEVELOPED Number of Links: 1 Jenkins Lane Drainage Report Packet Pg. 201 2.2.a Link Name: Inf Trench Link Type: Structure Downstream Link: None Prismatic Pond Option Used Pond Floor Elevation (ft) Riser Crest Elevation (ft) Max Pond Elevation (ft) Storage Depth (ft) 3.00 Pond Bottom Length (ft) Pond Bottom Width (ft) Pond Side Slopes (ft/ft) Bottom Area (sq-ft) : 144. Area at Riser Crest El (sq-ft) : 144. (acres) Volume at Riser Crest (cu-ft) : 432. (ac-ft) Area at Max Elevation (sq-ft) : 144. (acres) Vol at Max Elevation (cu-ft) : 590. (ac-ft) Constant Infiltration Option Used Infiltration Rate (in/hr): 11.50 Riser Geometry Riser Structure Type Riser Diameter (in) : 12.00 Common Length (ft) : 0.000 Riser Crest Elevation Hydraulic Structure Geometry Number of Devices: 0 100.00 103.00 104.00 18.0 8.0 L1= 0.00 L2= 0.00 W1= 0.00 W2= 0.00 0.003 0.010 0.003 0.014 Circular 103.00 ft **********************FLOOD FREQUENCY AND DURATION STATISTICS******************* ----------------------SCENARIO: PREDEVELOPED Number of Subbasins: 1 Number of Links: 0 ----------------------SCENARIO: POSTDEVELOPED Number of Subbasins: 1 Number of Links: 1 ********** Link: Inf Trench "**"**** Link WSEL Stats WSEL Frequency Data(ft) (Recurrence Interval Computed Using Gringorten Plotting Position) Tr (yrs) WSEL Peak (ft) -------------------------------------- -------------------------------------- 1.05-Year 100.014 1.11-Year 100.015 1.25-Year 100.017 2.00-Year 100.121 3.33-Year 100.244 5-Year 100.364 10-Year 100.685 25-Year 101.094 50-Year 101.755 100-Year 102.988 Jenkins Lane Drainage Report Packet Pg. 202 2.2.a ***********Groundwater Recharge Summary ************* Recharge is computed as input to Perind Groundwater Plus Infiltration in Structures Total Predeveloped Recharge During Simulation Model Element Recharge Amount (ac-ft) Subbasin: Subbasin 1 184.091 Total: 184.091 Total Post Developed Recharge During Simulation Model Element Recharge Amount (ac-ft) Subbasin: Project Basin 113.333 Link: Inf Trench 55.396 Total: 168.728 Total Predevelopment Recharge is Greater than Post Developed Average Recharge Per Year, (Number of Years= 158) Predeveloped: 1.165 ac-ft/year, Post Developed: 1.068 ac-ft/year ***********Water Quality Facility Data ************* ----------------------SCENARIO: PREDEVELOPED Number of Links: 0 ----------------------SCENARIO: POSTDEVELOPED Number of Links: 1 ********** Link: Inf Trench Basic Wet Pond Volume (91 % Exceedance): 581. cu-ft Computed Large Wet Pond Volume, 1.5*Basic Volume: 872. cu-ft Time to Infiltrate 91 % Treatment Volume, (Hours): 4.21 Infiltration/Filtration Statistics -------------------- Inflow Volume (ac-ft): 55.40 Inflow Volume Including PPT-Evap (ac-ft): 55.40 Total Runoff Infiltrated (ac-ft): 55.40, 100.00% Total Runoff Filtered (ac-ft): 0.00, 0.00% Primary Outflow To Downstream System (ac-ft): 0.00 Secondary Outflow To Downstream System (ac-ft): 0.00 Percent Treated (Infiltrated+Filtered)/Total Volume: 100.00% ***********Compliance Point Results ************* Scenario Predeveloped Compliance Subbasin: Subbasin 1 Scenario Postdeveloped Compliance Link: Inf Trench *** Point of Compliance Flow Frequency Data *** Recurrence Interval Computed Using Gringorten Plotting Position Predevelopment Runoff Postdevelopment Runoff Tr (Years) Discharge (cfs) Tr (Years) Discharge (cfs) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2-Year 6.198E-04 2-Year 1.209E-06 5-Year 6.632E-04 5-Year 3.644E-06 10-Year 6.708E-04 10-Year 6.853E-06 25-Year 6.767E-04 25-Year 1.095E-05 50-Year 6.776E-04 50-Year 1.755E-05 100-Year 6.776E-04 100-Year 2.357E-02 200-Year 7.535E-04 200-Year 2.496E-02 ** Record too Short to Compute Peak Discharge for These Recurrence Intervals Jenkins Lane Drainage Report Packet Pg. 203 2.2.a StormTech SC-740 Chamber Selection Sized for Infiltration Bottom: Bottom Area Design Size for Infiltration Facility = 18' length x 8' width = 144 square feet Bottom Area of a StormTech SC-740 Chamber = 85.4" length x 51.0" width = 30.2 square feet Minimum # of Required StormTech Modules = 144 sqft / 30.2 sqft = 4.76 modules --* 5 modules Sized for Detention Volume: Volume Design Size for Infiltration Facility = 18' length x 8' width x 3' depth = 432 cubic feet Total System Culmulative Storage of a StormTech SC-740 Chamber = 74.9 cubic feet Minimum # of Required StormTech Modules = 432 cf / 74.9 cf = 5.77 cartridges ---> 6 modules StormTech SC-740 Chamber Design Selection — 6 modules Note: Specifications provided from ADS' StormTech Product Catalog Jenkins Lane Drainage Report Packet Pg. 204 2.2.a SECTION 8 MINIMUM REQUIREMENT #8 WETLANDS PROTECTION Jenkins Lane Drainage Report Packet Pg. 205 2.2.a Wetlands Protection There are no existing wetlands on -site or immediately downstream; therefore wetland hydroperiod calculations are not required for this project. Jenkins Lane Drainage Report Packet Pg. 206 2.2.a SECTION 9 MINIMUM REQUIREMENT #9 OPEARTIONS AND MAINTENANCE MANUAL Jenkins Lane Drainage Report Packet Pg. 207 2.2.a Operations and Maintenance Manual Stormwater facilities and BMPs shall be inspected, operated and maintained in accordance with the City of Edmonds Stormwater Code Supplement, as well as the LID manual. Additional maintenance recommendations can be found in Volume V, Chapter 4 of the 2005 Department of Ecology Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington, including the recommendations contained on the following pages: Jenkins Lane Drainage Report Packet Pg. 208 2.2.a No. 2 — Infiltration Facilities Maintenance Defect Conditions When Maintenance Is Needed Results Expected When Component Maintenance Is Performed General Trash & Debris Function of facility is impaired by or likely to Trash and debris is be impaired by trash and debris. removed. Vegetation Function of facility is impaired by vegetation. Vegetation is removed or managed to restore proper function of facility. Use of herbicides shall be in accordance with an Integrated Pest Management Plan. Contaminants and Any evidence of oil, gasoline, contaminants or Contaminants or pollutants Pollution other pollutants are removed Note: Coordinate removal/cleanup with local and/or state water quality response agency. Erosion Eroded damage over 2 inches deep where cause Slopes are stabilized using of damage is still present or where there is appropriate erosion control potential for continued erosion. measure(s); e.g., rock reinforcement, planting of grass, compaction. Storage Area Sediment Water ponding in infiltration pond after rainfall Sediment is removed and/or ceases and appropriate time allowed for facility is cleaned so that infiltration. infiltration system works (A percolation test pit or test of facility according to design. indicates facility is only working at 90% of its designed capabilities. If two inches or more sediment is present, remove). Filter Bags (if Sediment and Debris Sediment and debris fill bag more than 1/2 full. Filter bag is replaced or applicable) system is redesigned. Rock Filters Sediment and Debris By visual inspection, little or no water flows Gravel in rock filter is through filter during heavy rain storms. replaced. Side Slopes of Pond Erosion See "Detention Ponds" (No. 1). See "Detention Ponds" (No. 1). Berms Settling Any part of a berm which has settled at least 4 Berm is repaired and inches lower than the design elevation. restored to the design If settlement is apparent, measure berm to elevation. determine amount of settlement. Settling can be an indication of more severe problems with the berm or outlet works. Note: A licensed civil engineer may be needed to determine the cause of the settlement. Erosion Any erosion observed on a compacted structural Slopes should be stabilized berm embankment. using appropriate erosion Note: A licensed civil engineer may be needed control measure(s); e.g., rock reinforcement, planting to inspect, evaluate and recommend a repair of grass, compaction. plan. Q Jenkins Lane Drainage Report Packet Pg. 209 2.2.a No. 2 — Infiltration Facilities Maintenance Defect Conditions When Maintenance Is Needed Results Expected When Component Maintenance Is Performed Piping Discernable water flow through a compacted Piping eliminated. Erosion structural berm. Ongoing erosion with potential potential resolved. for erosion to continue. Tree growth on a compacted structural berm over 4 feet in height may lead to piping through the berm which could lead to failure of the berm. Evidence of rodent holes in berm, and/or water piping through berm via rodent holes Note: A geotechnical engineer may be needed to inspect and evaluate condition and recommend repair of condition. Emergency Tree Growth Tree growth on emergency spillways creates Trees should be removed. Overflow Spillway blockage problems and may cause failure of the If root system is small (base berm due to uncontrolled overtopping. less than 4 inches) the root system may be left in place. Otherwise the roots should be removed and the berm restored. Note: A licensed civil engineer may be needed to determine proper berm/spillway restoration. Rock Armoring Rock layer on subgrade is less than 1.0 feet Rocks and pad depth are deep and/or subgrade is exposed restored to a minimum depth of 1.0 feet. Erosion Eroded damage over 2 inches deep where cause Slopes are stabilized using of damage is still present or where there is appropriate erosion control potential for continued erosion. measure(s); e.g., rock reinforcement, planting of grass, compaction. Pre -settling Ponds Facility or sump The settling area or sump contains Sediment/debris is removed. and Vaults filled with Sediment sediment/debris up to a depth of either 6 inches and/or debris or the sedimentation design depth. r� Q Jenkins Lane Drainage Report Packet Pg. 210 2.2.a No. 3 — Underground Detention Pipes/Tanks Maintenance Defect Conditions When Maintenance is Needed Results Expected When Component Maintenance is Performed Storage Area Plugged Air Vents One-half of the cross section of a vent is blocked Vents open and at any point or the vent is damaged. functioning. Debris and Sediment The average sediment depth measured at All sediment, debris, multiple locations exceeds 10% of the detention and organic matter pipe diameter (or the depth of the storage area) removed from storage or the sediment depth measured at any single point exceeds 15% of the pipe diameter. area. (Example: The sediment depth in a 60-inch diameter detention pipe is measured at three locations. The sediment would need to be removed if the average depth of the three measurements is at least 6 inches or if the depth of any single measurement is at least 9 inches. Joints Between Any openings or voids at section joint allowing All joints between Tank/Pipe Section material to seep into or water to leak out of tank/pipe sections are facility. sealed. Note: This may need an engineering analysis to assess the structural stability. Tank or Pipe Bent Out Any part of tank/pipe is bent out of shape more Tank/pipe section is of Shape than 10% of its design shape. repaired or replaced to Note: This may need an engineering analysis to design. assess the structural stability. Tank/Pipe Material Any visible holes or cracks wider than a quarter Tank/pipe is repaired or of an inch or evidence of material seeping into or replaced to design water leaking out of pipe wall, or qualified specifications and is maintenance or inspection personnel determine structurally sound. that tank/pipe is not structurally sound. Access Hole Cover Not in Place Cover is missing or only partially in place. Any Manhole is closed. open manhole requires maintenance. Locking Mechanism Locking mechanism cannot be opened or lock Mechanism or lock Not Working bolts cannot be removed by one maintenance bolts open with proper person with proper hand tools. hand tools. Cover Difficult to One maintenance person cannot remove lid after Cover can be removed Remove applying normal lifting pressure with proper and reinstalled by one hand tools. Intent is to keep cover from sealing maintenance person off access to maintenance. with proper hand tools. Ladder Rungs Unsafe Ladder is unsafe due to missing rungs, Ladder meets design cracked/broken rungs, misalignment, rungs not standards and allows securely attached to structure wall, rust, or maintenance person cracks. safe access. Catch Basins See -Catch Basinsll See -Catch Basinsll (No. 5). See -Catch Basinsll (No. 5) (No. 5). Standpipe, Obstructions, Damaged, See -Control Structure/Flow Restrictorsll (No. 4) See -Control Cleanout Gate, or Missing Structure/Flow Orifice Plate Restrictorsll (No. 4) Q Jenkins Lane Drainage Report Packet Pg. 211 2.2.a No. 4 — Control Structure/Flow Restrictors Maintenance Defect Condition When Maintenance is Needed Results Expected Component When Maintenance is Performed Standpipe Obstructions Any material blocking (or having the potential of Pipe is free of all blocking) the pipe overflow. obstructions and works as designed. Structural Damage Structure is not securely attached to manhole Structure is securely wall. attached to wall and outlet pipe. Structure is not in upright position (allow up to Structure is in correct 10% from plumb). position. Connections to outlet pipe are not watertight and Connections to outlet show signs of rust. pipe are water tight; structure repaired or replaced and works as designed. Any holes other than designed holes in the Structure has no holes structure. other than designed holes. Cleanout Gate Damaged or Missing Cleanout gate is not watertight or is missing. Gate is watertight and works as designed. Gate cannot be moved up and down by one Gate moves up and maintenance person. down easily and is watertight. Chain/rod leading to gate is missing or damaged. Chain is in place and works as designed. Gate is rusted over 50% of its surface area. Gate is repaired or replaced to meet design standards. Orifice Plate Damaged or Missing Control device is not working properly due to Plate is in place and missing, out of place, or bent orifice plate. works as designed. Obstructions Any trash, debris, sediment, or vegetation Plate is free of all blocking the plate. obstructions and works as designed. Overflow Pipe Obstructions Any trash or debris blocking (or having the Pipe is free of all potential of blocking) the overflow pipe. obstructions and works as designed. Access Hole Cover Not in Place Cover is missing or only partially in place. Any Manhole is closed. open manhole requires maintenance. Locking Mechanism Locking mechanism cannot be opened or lock Mechanism or lock Not Working bolts cannot be removed by one maintenance bolts open with proper person with proper hand tools. hand tools. Cover Difficult to One maintenance person cannot remove lid after Cover can be removed Remove applying normal lifting pressure with proper and reinstalled by one hand tools. Intent is to keep cover from sealing maintenance person off access to maintenance. with proper hand tools. Ladder Rungs Unsafe Ladder is unsafe due to missing rungs, Ladder meets design cracked/broken rungs, misalignment, rungs not standards and allows securely attached to structure wall, rust, or maintenance person cracks. safe access. Q Jenkins Lane Drainage Report Packet Pg. 212 2.2.a No. 4 — Control Structure/Flow Restrictors Maintenance Defect Condition When Maintenance is Needed Results Expected Component When Maintenance is Performed Catch Basin See -Catch Basinsll See -Catch Basinsll (No. 5). See —Catch Basinsll (No. 5). (No. 5). Sediment & Debris Sediment, trash, vegetation, and/or other debris Control structure orifice material exceeds 25% of the catch basin sump is not blocked. All depth or is 1 foot below the orifice plate. sediment and debris removed. 0 N 0 0 ti 0 N Z J IL c 0 A r 0 J d LL d C c0 J C Y C N N W C N E t t� r r Q t r 3 0 a d c� r 2z z x Lu c m E Q Jenkins Lane Drainage Report Packet Pg. 213 2.2.a No. 5 — Catch Basins Maintenance Defect Conditions When Maintenance is Needed Results Expected When Component Maintenance is performed General Sediment & Sediment, trash, and/or other debris material is No sediment or debris is Debris located immediately in front of the catch basin located immediately in front opening or is blocking inletting capacity of the of catch basin or on grate basin by more than 10%. opening. Sediment, trash, and/or other debris material No sediment or debris is in (located in the catch basin) exceeds 60 percent of the catch basin. the sump depth as measured from the bottom of basin to invert of the lowest pipe into or out of the basin, but in no case less than a minimum of six inches clearance from the debris surface to the invert of the lowest pipe. Sediment, trash, and/or other debris material Inlet and outlet pipes are free located in any inlet or outlet pipe is blocking more of sediment and debris. than 1/3 of its height. Dead animals or vegetation that impair catch basin No dead animals or function or that could generate odors that could vegetation are present within cause complaints or dangerous gases (e.g., the catch basin. methane). Structure Top slab has holes larger than 2 square inches or Top slab is free of holes and Damage to cracks wider than 1/4 inch cracks. Frame and/or Top Slab (Intent is to make sure no material is seeping into the catch basin). No water and/or soil is seeping into the catch basin Frame not sitting flush on top slab, i.e., separation Frame is sitting flush on the of more than 3/4 inch of the frame from the top riser rings or top slab and slab. Frame not securely attached firmly attached. Fractures or Cracks wider than 1/2 inch or evidence of soil Catch basin is replaced or Cracks in Basin particles entering the structure through the cracks, repaired to design standards. Walls/ Bottom or qualified maintenance or inspection personnel determine that the vault is not structurally sound. Grout fillet has separated or cracked wider than Pipe is regrouted and secure 1/2 inch and longer than 1 foot at the joint of any at basin wall. inlet/outlet pipe or any evidence of soil particles entering catch basin through cracks. Settlement/ Settlement of misalignment of the catch basin Catch basin is replaced or Misalignment causes a safety, function, or design problem. repaired to design standards. Contaminants Any evidence of oil, gasoline, contaminants or Contaminants or pollutants and Pollution other pollutants are removed. Note: Coordinate removal/cleanup with local and/or state water quality response agency. Access Hole Cover Cover Not in Cover is missing or only partially in place. Any Catch basin cover is fully in Place open catch basin requires maintenance. place Locking Locking mechanism cannot be opened or lock Mechanism or lock bolts Mechanism Not bolts cannot be removed by one maintenance open with proper hand tools. Working person with proper hand tools. Cover Difficult One maintenance person cannot remove lid after Cover can be removed and to Remove applying normal lifting pressure with proper hand reinstalled by one tools. Intent is keep cover from sealing off access maintenance person with to maintenance. proper hand tools. Q Jenkins Lane Drainage Report Packet Pg. 214 2.2.a No. 5 — Catch Basins Maintenance Defect Conditions When Maintenance is Needed Results Expected When Component Maintenance is performed Ladder Ladder Rungs Ladder is unsafe due to missing rungs, Ladder meets design Unsafe cracked/broken rungs, rungs not securely attached standards and allows to basin wall, misalignment, rust, cracks, or sharp maintenance person safe edges. access. Metal Grates Trash and Trash and debris that is blocking more than 20% Grate free of trash and (If Applicable) Debris of grate surface inletting capacity. debris. Damaged or Grate missing or broken member(s) of the grate. Grate is in place and meets Missing. design standards. No. 6 — Debris Barriers (e.g., Trash Racks) Maintenance Defect Condition When Maintenance is Needed Results Expected When Components Maintenance is Performed General Trash and Trash or debris that is plugging more than Barrier cleared to design flow Debris 20% of the openings in the barrier. capacity. Metal Damaged/ Bars are bent out of shape more than 3 Bars in place with no bends more Missing Bars. inches. than 3/4 inch. Bars are missing or entire barrier missing. Bars in place according to design. Bars are loose and rust is causing 50% Barrier replaced or repaired to design deterioration to any part of barrier. standards. Inlet/Outlet Debris barrier missing or not attached to pipe Barrier firmly attached to pipe Pipe Jenkins Lane Drainage Report Packet Pg. 215 2.2.a No. 7 — Energy Dissipaters Maintenance Defect Conditions When Maintenance is Needed Results Expected When Components Maintenance is Performed Rock Pad Missing or Only one layer of rock exists above native Rock pad replaced to design Moved Rock soil in area five square feet or larger, or any standards. exposure of native soil where pad was originally installed. Erosion Soil erosion in or adjacent to rock pad. Rock pad replaced to design standards. Rock Gabion Wire basket Deterioration determined to be near to Rewire area of concern or replace Structures matrix breaking. Broken wire results in hole large basket and/or rocks as necessary deteriorated enough to allow rocks to protrude out of or broken basket Wire basket Baskets have shifted and no longer providing Realign or relocate as necessary to misaligned full energy dissipations or may be prone to meet design intent tipping or collapse Dispersion Trench Perforated Accumulated sediment that exceeds 20% of Pipe cleaned/flushed so that it Pipe Plugged the design depth or over 1/3 of perforations matches design. with in pipe are plugged. Sediment Not Water is discharging at a few concentrated Trench redesigned or rebuilt to Discharging points along the top of the trench rather than standards. Water flowing uniformly along the entire length of Properly trench lip. —Distributorll Water is observed or reported to be flowing Facility rebuilt or redesigned to Catch Basin out of top of basin during any storm less than standards. Overflows the design storm. Receiving Water in receiving area is causing or has No danger of landslides. Area Over- potential of causing landslide problems. Saturated Catch Basins Other Defects See match Basinsll (No. 5). See match Basinsll (No. 5). Q Jenkins Lane Drainage Report Packet Pg. 216 2.2.a No.15 - Stormf"llteem Maintenance Defect Condition When Maintenance is Needed Results Expected When Component Maintenance is Performed Below Ground Sediment Sediment depth exceeds 1/4 inch. No sediment deposits which would Vault Accumulation on impede permeability of the Media. compost media. Sediment Sediment depth exceeds 6 inches in first No sediment deposits in vault Accumulation in chamber. bottom of first chamber. Vault Trash/Debris Trash and debris accumulated on compost Trash and debris removed from the Accumulation filter bed. compost filter bed. Sediment/Debris in Sediment, trash, and/or other debris material Sediment and debris removed. Drain located in any inlet, outlet, or cleanout pipe is Pipes/Cleanouts blocking more than 1/3 of its height. Damaged Pipes Any part of the pipes that are crushed or Pipe repaired and/or replaced. damaged due to corrosion and/or settlement. Access Hole Cover One maintenance person cannot remove lid Cover can be removed and Damaged/Not after applying normal lifting pressure with reinstalled by one maintenance Working proper hand tools. person with proper hand tools. Vault Structure Cracks wider than 1/2 inch or evidence of Vault replaced or repairs made so Includes Cracks in soil particles entering the structure through that vault meets design Wall, Bottom, the cracks, or qualified maintenance or specifications and is structurally Damage to Frame inspection personnel determine that the vault sound. and/or Top Slab is not structurally sound. Cracks wider than 1/2 inch at the joint of any Vault repaired so that no cracks inlet/outlet pipe or evidence of soil particles exist wider than 1/4 inch at the entering through the cracks. joint of the inlet/outlet pipe. Baffles Baffles corroding, cracking warping, and/or Baffles repaired or replaced to showing signs of failure as determined by specifications. qualified maintenance or inspection personnel. Access Ladder Ladder is corroded or deteriorated, not Ladder replaced or repaired and Damaged functioning properly, not securely attached to meets specifications, and is safe to structure wall, missing rungs, has use as determined by inspection cracked/broken rungs, and/or is misaligned. personnel. Below Ground Media clogged Drawdown of water through the media takes Media cartridges replaced. Cartridge Type longer than 1 hour, and/or overflow occurs frequently. Flow short Flows do not properly enter filter cartridges. Filter cartridges replaced. Circuited Check manufacturer's operation and maintenance manual for complete maintenance instructions. Jenkins Lane Drainage Report Packet Pg. 217 2.2.a No.16 — API Baffle Oil/Water Separators Maintenance Defect Condition When Maintenance is Results Expected When Maintenance Component Needed is Performed General Discharged Water Not Water discharged from facility has Treated stormwater discharged from Clean obvious signs of poor water quality. vault should be clear without thick visible sheen. Sediment Sediment depth in bottom of vault No sediment deposits on vault bottom Accumulation exceeds 6 inches in depth. that would impede flow through the vault and reduce separation efficiency. Trash and Debris Trash and debris accumulation in Trash and debris removed from vault, Accumulation vault, or pipe inlet/outlet, floatables and inlet/outlet piping. and non-floatables. Oil Accumulation Oil accumulations that exceed 1 inch, Extract oil from vault by vactoring. at the surface of the water. Disposal in accordance with state and local regulations. Damaged Pipes Inlet or outlet pipes damaged or Pipes repaired or replaced. broken and in need of repair. Access Hole Cover One maintenance person cannot Cover can be removed and reinstalled Damaged/Not remove lid after applying normal by one maintenance person with proper Working lifting pressure with proper hand hand tools. tools. Vault Structure Cracks wider than 1/2 inch or Vault replaced or repairs made so that Damage - Includes evidence of soil particles entering the vault meets design specifications and is Cracks in Walls structure through the cracks, or structurally sound. Bottom, Damage to qualified maintenance or inspection Frame and/or Top Slab personnel determine that the vault is not structurally sound. Cracks wider than 1/2 inch at the Vault repaired so that no cracks exist joint of any inlet/outlet pipe or wider than 1/4 inch at the joint of the evidence of soil particles entering inlet/outlet pipe. through the cracks. Baffles Baffles corroding, cracking, warping Baffles repaired or replaced to and/or showing signs of failure as specifications. determined by qualified maintenance or inspection personnel. Access Ladder Ladder is corroded or deteriorated, Ladder replaced or repaired and meets Damaged not functioning properly, not securely specifications, and is safe to use as attached to structure wall, missing determined by inspection personnel. rungs, has crackedibroken rungs, and/or is misaligned. r� Q Jenkins Lane Drainage Report Packet Pg. 218 2.2.a No.18 — Catchbasin Inserts Maintenance Defect Conditions When Maintenance is Needed Results Expected When Component Maintenance is Performed General Sediment When sediment forms a cap over the insert No sediment cap on the insert Accumulation media of the insert and/or unit. media and its unit. Trash and Debris Trash and debris accumulates on insert unit Trash and debris removed from Accumulation creating a blockage/restriction. insert unit. Runoff freely flows into catch basin. Media Insert Not Effluent water from media insert has a visible Effluent water from media insert Removing Oil sheen. is free of oils and has no visible sheen. Media Insert Catch basin insert is saturated with water and Remove and replace media insert Water Saturated no longer has the capacity to absorb. Media Insert -Oil Media oil saturated due to petroleum spill Remove and replace media insert. Saturated that drains into catch basin. Media Insert Use Media has been used beyond the typical Remove and replace media at Beyond Normal average life of media insert product. regular intervals, depending on Product Life insert product. Q Jenkins Lane Drainage Report Packet Pg. 219 2.2.a No. 21 - Conveyance Storm Pipes - Drainage System Potential Conditions When Maintenance Is Results Expected When Maintenance Feature Defect Needed Is Performed Or Not Needed General Obstructions, Root enters or deforms pipe, reducing Use mechanical methods to remove root Including Roots flow. if possible. Use of chemicals to remove roots shall be done in accordance with an Integrated Pest Management plan. If necessary, remove the vegetation over the line. Pipe Dented or Inlet/outlet piping damaged or broken Pipe repaired and/or replaced. Broken and in need of repair. Pipe Rusted or Any part of the piping that is crushed Pipe repaired and/or replaced. Deteriorated or deformed more than 20% or any other failure to the piping. Sediment & Sediment depth is greater than 20% of Install upstream debris traps (where Debris pipe diameter. applicable) then clean pipe and remove material. Debris barrier or A debris barrier or trash rack that had Debris barrier or trash rack is replaced. Trash Rack been installed on the end of a drainage Missing pipe is missing Joint/Seal The joint between pipe sections is The joint and/or seal is repaired so that Problems separated and/or the seal at the joint is joint is not separated and is properly cracked or broken. sealed. Q Jenkins Lane Drainage Report Packet Pg. 220 2.2.a No. 22 - Facility Discharge Points Drainage System Potential Conditions When Maintenance Is Results Expected When Maintenance Feature Defect Needed Is Performed Or Not Needed Monitoring Inspection of Sheen, obvious oil or other Identify and eliminate pollution source Discharge Water contaminants present. AND report discharge to Snohomish for Obvious County Surface Water Management Signs of Poor Division. Water Quality. Effluent discharge from facility should be clear. Receiving Area Water in receiving area is causing Receiving area sound. Saturated substrate to become saturated and unstable. General Rock Pad - Only one layer of rock exists above Rock pad replaced to design standards. Missing or native soil in area five square feet or Moved Rock larger, or any exposure of native soil where pad was originally installed. Rock Pad - Soil erosion in or adjacent to rock pad. Rock pad replaced to design standards. Erosion Obstructions, Roots or debris enters pipe or deforms Use mechanical methods to remove root Including Roots pipe, reducing flow if possible. Use of chemicals to remove roots shall be done in accordance with Integrated Pest Management plan. If necessary, remove the vegetation over the line Pipe Rusted or Any part of the pipe that is broken, Pipe repaired or replaced. Deteriorated crushed or deformed more than 20% or any other failure to the piping No. 23 — Access Gates Maintenance Defect Condition When Maintenance is Maintenance Action and Expected Component Needed Results General Damaged or Gate and/or locking mechanism Gate and locking mechanism are fully missing condition is such that access is functional for access purposes. components impeded. Damaged or Broken or missing hinges such that gate Hinges intact and lubed. Gate is working missing cannot be easily opened and closed by a freely. components maintenance person. Damaged or Gate is out of plumb more than 6 inches missing and more than 1 foot out of design Gate is aligned and vertical (plumb). components alignment. Damaged or missing Missing stretcher bands, and ties. Stretcher bar, bands, and ties in place. components Jenkins Lane Drainage Report Packet Pg. 221 2.2.a No. 24 — Access Roads Maintenance Defect Condition When Maintenance is Maintenance Action and Expected Component Needed Results General Road Surface Condition of road surface may lead Road repaired. to erosion of the facility or limit access. Erosion of Noticeable rills are seen in Causes of erosion are identified and Ground landscaped areas. steps taken to slow down/spread out Surface the water. Eroded areas are filled, contoured, and seeded. If needed, regrade affected areas. Vegetation Function of road is impaired by vegetation Vegetation is removed or managed to restore proper function of facility. Use of herbicides shall be in accordance with an Integrated Pest Management Plan. Tree Growth Tree growth does not allow Trees do not hinder maintenance maintenance access or interferes with activities. maintenance activity (i.e., slope mowing, silt removal, vactoring, or equipment movements). If trees are not interfering with access or maintenance, do not remove. Trees or shrubs that have fallen Fallen trees or shrubs removed from over road. road. 0 N 0 0 ti 0 N z J IL a O .y :a Cn O J m IL m c co J N c Y c d N ram+ C N E t t� O r r Q t r 3 O a d c� r CO 2z z x w c m E Q Jenkins Lane Drainage Report Packet Pg. 222 2.2.a SECTION 10 MINIMUM REQUIREMENT #10 OFFSITE ANALYSIS AND MITIGATION Jenkins Lane Drainage Report Packet Pg. 223 2.2.a Qualitative Analysis For this project site the ultimate discharge point is to Puget Sound. Based from Section 4.10.2 of the City of Edmonds Stormwater Supplemental Code, the downstream analysis was conducted through the existing drainage system to Willow Creek. Currently there seems to be no capacity problem found from the downstream analysis and the project site should not cause problems as most of the runoff will be detained before infiltrated into the ground. This downstream analysis is provided in Appendix 3C of this report. Quantitative Analysis Not Applicable. Jenkins Lane Drainage Report Packet Pg. 224 2.2.a SECTION 11 MINIMUM REQUIREMENT #11 FINANCIAL LIABILITY Jenkins Lane Drainage Report Packet Pg. 225 2.2.a Performance Bond The project site is not located within any critical areas nor does the project involve 7,000 square feet or more of land disturbing activity. Therefore a performance bond is not required for this project. Jenkins Lane Drainage Report Packet Pg. 226 2.2.a CITY OF EDMONDS 121 5t" Avenue North, Edmonds WA 98020 Phone: 425.771.0220 • Fax: 425.771.0221 • Web: www.edmondswa DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT • PLANNING DIVISION '`1e. 18yV July 21, 2017 Mr. Ken McIntyre SDA Engineering Via email: Kmcintyreksdaengineers.com SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOR SUBDIVISION APPLICATION LOCATED AT 720 13TH WAY SW FILE NO. PLN20170028 Dear Mr. McIntyre: Staff has begun review of your land use application for a five -lot plat located at 720 1 P Way SW (File No. PLN20170028). However, it was found that your application is incomplete. Please submit the following items at your earliest convenience including a response letter indicating how each item was addressed so that staff can continue processing your application: 1. A determination under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) is required for all formal subdivision applications (subdivisions into five or more lots). Please submit a completed environmental checklist (see Handout #P71) and associated $670 review fee in order for staff to be able to issue a SEPA determination for the subject proposal. 2. The title report must be prepared within 30 days of application submittal. The effective date on Page 2 of the title report submitted with your application was blank, so staff is unable to determine whether this title report was prepared within the required timeframe. Please provide an updated title report for the subject site prepared within 30 days of the application submittal date. 3. The legal description of the subject parcel as stated on the face of the preliminary plat documents refers to a different recording number than the legal description within the title report. Please explain this discrepancy. 4. Please make the following corrections/clarifications to the preliminary plat: a. The minimum required setbacks associated with the RS-6 zone are shown incorrectly on the preliminary plans. The RS-6 zone requires the following minimum setbacks: Street = 20', Side = 5', Rear = 15'. The 20' street setback must be taken from all property lines adjacent to City right-of-way and all portions of the property lines adjacent to vehicular access tracts providing access to five or more lots. The rear setback is taken from the property line most opposite and distant from the street property line, and side setbacks are taken from the remaining property lines. The note regarding setbacks under the "Project Information" heading will also need to be revised, as it includes an incorrect rear setback and the 19' garage setback specified in these notes is not correct. Setbacks for garages are the same as those for the main residence. b. The minimum required lot width for the RS-6 zone is 60 feet, which is measured with a 60-foot diameter circle that must fit within the boundaries of each of the proposed lots. Please make any necessary adjustments to the dimensions of the proposed lots in order to Page 1 of 2 ATTACH Packet Pg. 227 2.2.a meet the minimum required lot with and indicate compliance with this requirement on the preliminary plat by drawing 60 foot circles within each of the proposed lots. 5. The subdivision review criteria of ECDC 20.75.085 specify that where environmental resources such as trees exist, the proposal shall be designed to minimize significant adverse impacts to the resources. Your preliminary civil plans indicate clearing of the entire subject site; however, it appears that it would be possible to retain many of the existing trees. Please revise the plans in order to minimize impacts to the existing trees and provide documentation indicating why the trees proposed for removal will need to be removed. 6. You cover letter refers to the project as the "Jenkins Lane Short Plat." Please note that subdivisions into five or more lots are considered formal plats, not short plats. You do not need to revise your cover letter to address this item. It is being provided for your information only. 7. After all requested corrections are made to the preliminary plans, please provide three large - format copies. Also, please provide PDFs of each plan sheet either on a USB drive or via email. 8. Please note that review by the Engineering Division is pending, and additional comments regarding the proposal may be sent separately. Please submit the above information (including a response letter indicating how each item was addressed) to the Planning Division as soon as possible so that staff may continue processing your application. Please keep in mind that a complete response to this information request must be received within 90 days or the application will lapse for lack of information (ECDC 20.02.003.D). Thus, your application will expire if the requested information is not received by October 19, 2017. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me via phone at (425) 771-0220 or via email at Jen.Machugakedmondswa.gov. Sincerely, Development Services Department - Planning Division Jen Machuga Associate Planner Cc: File No. PLN20170028 Page 2 of 2 Packet Pg. 228 2.2.a MEMORANDUM Date: August 2, 2017 To: Jen Machuga, Associate Planner From: Jeanie McConnell, Engineering Program Manager Subject: PLN20170028, Jenkins Lane 5 lot plat 720 —13t" Way The comments provided below are based upon review of the preliminary civil plans & documents for the subject plat. Additional information is requested from the applicant at this time in order to continue review of the application and provide preliminary approval of the plat. Please ask the applicant to provide a written response to each of the comments below and revise and resubmit plans accordingly. GENERAL 1. 1� SW shall be widened to 22-feet exclusive of curb and gutter. Please refer to City of Edmonds standard detail E2.1.3 below and update preliminary development plans accordingly. AVEMENT C❑MPACTI❑N- 91'/. 4'- 1-1/4' CSBC ICE DENSITY APPROVED SUBGRADE RIGHT OF WAY WIDTH BGRADE,BASE,T❑P COURSE BASED ON WSD❑T`S CITY City of Edmonds ATTACH Packet Pg. 229 2.2.a 2. At this specific locaton, two driveway access points on 13th Way will be considered. However, with this consideration, the development shall be designed in a way that makes it clear why the additional driveway cut is necessary for the overall design of the project, beyond the obvious reduced width for the shared access road. Revise plans such that the two access points to the property are not immediately adjacent to each other and in addition, are located consistent with the neighborhood. 3. Show the location of existing and proposed dry utilities. 4. Provide approximate invert elevations for sanitary sewer system to show feasibility. Call out length and size of all pipe to verify slopes. 5. Sheet C4.0 indicates a 10-foot drainage facility setback with reference to sheet 4.1. It appears as though the reference should be to sheet C5.0. Please revise as needed. 6. Please revise the title of the survey to state "plat" instead of "short plat". Thank you. Packet Pg. 230 2.2.a i August 18, 2017 Jen Machuga Associate Planner City of Edmonds 121 5th Avenue North Edmonds WA 98020 Jenkins Lane 5 Lot Plat (PLN20170028) Response to 1st Preliminary Review Comments SDA PROJECT NUMBER 362-004-161234 Dear Jen, RECEIVED AUG 2017 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES COUNTER We are pleased to provide this letter and attached documents in support of the Jenkins Lane Plat. This submittal package is provided in response to your letter dated July 21, 2017 requesting additional project information, as well as an engineering review memo to you from Jeanie McConnell issued on August 2, 2017. We are providing revised drawings and supporting documents which address the comments in the two letters referenced above. Those comments are provided below (in plain text), along with our response (in bold italics), to demonstrate how each comment was addressed. Planning: 1. A determination under the State Environment Policy Act (SEPA) is required for all formal subdivision applications (subdivision into five or more lots). Please submit a completed environmental checklist (see Handout #P71) and associated $670 review fee in order for staff to be able to issue a SEPA determination for the subject proposal. The requested SEPA checklist has been provided with this submittal package. 2. The title report must be prepared within 30 days of application submittal. The effective date on Page 2 of the title report submitted with your application was blank, so staff is unable to determine whether this title report was prepared within the required timeframe. Please provide an updated title report for the subject site prepared within 30 days of the application submittal date. A title report has been provided with this submittal package. 3. The legal description of the subject parcel as stated on the face of the preliminary plat documents refers to a different recording number than the legal description within the title report. Please explain this discrepancy. The legal description on the plat has been updated to match the title report. SDA 1724 W. Marine View Drive, Suite 140 ATTACfH Packet Pg. 231 Everett, WA 9 820 1 F. 2.2.a Jen Machuga Jenkins Lane 5 Lot Plat (PLN20170028) Response to 1s' Preliminary Review Comments August18 2017 2 4. Please make the following corrections/clarifications to the preliminary plat: a. The minimum required setbacks associated with the RS-6 zone are shown incorrectly on the preliminary plans. The RS-6 zone requires the following minimum setbacks: Street = 20', Side = 5', Rear = 15'. The 20' street setback must be taken from all property lines adjacent to City right-of-way and all portions of the property lines adjacent to vehicular access tracts providing access to five or more lots. The rear setback is taken from the property line most opposite and distant from the streat property line, and side setbacks are taken from the remaining property lines. The note regarding setbacks under the "Project Information" heading will also need to be revised, as it includes an incorrect rear setback and the 19' garage setback specified in these notes is not correct. Setbacks for garages are the same as those for the main residence. The setbacks have been corrected in accordance with subsequent correspondence with City staff, and are shown on the site plan (Sheet C4.0). b. The minimum required lot width for the RS-6 zone is 60 feet, which is measured with a 60-foot diameter circle that must fit within the boundaries of each of the proposed lots. Please make any necessary adjustments to the dimensions of the proposed lots in order to meet the minimum required lot with and indicate compliance with this requirement on the preliminary plat by drawing 60 foot circles within each of the proposed lots. A 60-foot circle has been added to the site plan (Sheet C4.0). 5. The subdivision review criteria of ECDC 20.75.085 specify that where environmental resources such as trees exist, the proposal shall be designed to minimize significant adverse impacts to the resources. Your preliminary civil plans indicate clearing of the entire subject site; however, it appears that it would be possible to retain many of the existing trees. Please revise the plans in order to minimize impacts to the existing trees and provide documentation indicating why the trees proposed for removal will need to be removed. A tree retention layout is now included on C3.0. 6. Your cover letter refers to the project as the "Jenkins Lane Short Plan." Please note that subdivisions into five or more lots are considered formal plats, not short plats. You do not need to revise your cover letter to address this item. It is being provided for your information only. Comment noted, and the submittal documents are revised accordingly. SDA 1724 W. Marine View Drive, Suite 140 P: 4 Packet Pg. 232 Everett, WA 98201 F:4 2.2.a Jen Machuga Jenkins Lane 5 Lot Plat (PLN20170028) Response to 15` Preliminary Review Comments August 18, 2017 Page 3 7. After all requested corrects are made to the preliminary plans, please provide three large - format copies. Also, please provide PDFs of each plan sheet either on a USB drive or via email. Comment noted. The requested electronic plans will be e-mailed. 8. Please note that review by the Engineering Division is pending, and additional comments regarding the proposal may be sent separately. See below responses from the Engineering Division. Engineering Division: Engineering Program Manager: Jeanie McConnell GENERAL 1. 131h Way SW shall be widened to 22-feet exclusive of curb and gutter. Please refer to City of Edmonds standard detail E2.1.3 below and update preliminary development plans accordingly. The plans are now updated with the COE's standard detail E2.1.3. See sheet C4.0. 2. At this specific location, two driveway access points on 13th Way will be considered. However, with this consideration, the development shall be designed in a way that makes it clear why the additional driveway cut is necessary for the overall design of the project, beyond the obvious reduced with for the shared access road. Revise plans such that the two access points to the property are not immediately adjacent to each other and in addition, are located consistent with the neighborhood. The access point on Lot 5 has been updated and is shown on sheet C4.0. 3. Show the location of existing and proposed dry utilities. A 10' dry utility easement is now included and show on sheet C4.0. 4. Provide approximate invert elevations for sanitary sewer system to show feasibility. Call out length and size of all pipes to verify slopes. The plans now include the invert elevations, length, and size of the pipes. See sheet C5.0. SDA 1724 W. Marine View Drive, Suite 140 P: Packet Pg. 133 Everett, WA 98201 F: 2.2.a Jen Machuga Jenkins Lane 5 Lot Plat (PLN20170028) Response to 1s' Preliminary Review Comments August 18, 2017 Page 4 5. Sheet C4.0 indicates a 10-foot drainage facility setback with reference to sheet 4.1. It appears as though the reference should be to sheet C5.0. Please revise as needed. Following further correspondence with the City, the drainage facility setback has been removed for the preliminary review process. It will be shown on the final engineering plans once the facility designs are complete. 6. Please revise the title of the survey to state "plat" instead of "short plat." The title has been updated as only "plat." Any questions or comments please don't hesitate to call me at (206) 484-3492 or email me at kmcintyre _sdaengineers.com. Sincerely, SDA Ken McIntyre, P.E. Senior Engineer SDA 1724 W. Marine View Drive, Suite 140 P: Packet Pg. 234 Everett, WA 98201 F: SUBDIVISION 2.2.a Guarantee/Certificate Number: Issued By: 500058615 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Update 1 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY a corporation, herein called the Company GUARANTEES Echelbarger Investments, LLC herein called the Assured, against actual loss not exceeding the liability amount stated in Schedule A which the Assured shall sustain by reason of any incorrectness in the assurances set forth in Schedule A. LIABILITY EXCLUSIONS AND LIMITATIONS 1. No guarantee is given nor liability assumed with respect to the identity of any party named or referred to in Schedule A or with respect to the validity, legal effect or priority of any matter shown therein. 2. The Company's liability hereunder shall be limited to the amount of actual loss sustained by the Assured because of reliance upon the assurance herein set forth, but in no event shall the Company's liability exceed the liability amount set forth in Schedule A. Please note carefully the liability exclusions and limitations and the specific assurances afforded by this guarantee. If you wish additional liability, or assurances other than as contained herein, please contact the Company for further information as to the availability and cost. Chicago Title Company of Washington 3002 Colby Ave., Suite 200 Everett, WA 98201 Countersigned By: Authorized Officer or Agent Chicago Title Insurance Company By: President i��NS �ggNc, p OPP�RAp 1p Attest: U° 9 J it Y Secretary Subdivision Guarantee/Certificate Printed: 08.17.17 @ 03:35 PM Page 1 WA-CT-FNRV-02150.624691-SPS-1-17-500058615 ATTACH ------Packet Pg. 235 2.2.a GUARANTEE/CERTIFICATE NO. 500058615 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY UPDATE 1 ISSUING OFFICE: Title Officer: Builder Unit Chicago Title Company of Washington 3002 Colby Ave., Suite 200 Everett, WA 98201 Fax: (866)827-8844 Main Phone: (425)259-8223 Email: evebuilder@ctt.com SCHEDULE A Liability Premium Tax $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Effective Date: August 11, 2017 at 08:00 AM The assurances referred to on the face page are: That, according to those public records which, under the recording laws, impart constructive notice of matter relative to the following described property: SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF Title to said real property is vested in: The Heirs and Devisees of Leo William LeFevre, deceased subject to the matters shown below under Exceptions, which Exceptions are not necessarily shown in the order of their priority. END OF SCHEDULE A Subdivision Guarantee/Certificate Printed: 08.17.17 @ 03:35 PM Page 2 WA-CT-FNRV-02150.624691-SPS-1-17-500058615 Packet Pg. 236 2.2.a EXHIBIT "A" Legal Description For APN/Parcel ID(s): 270325-003-141-00 PARCEL 4 OF CITY OF EDMONDS SHORT PLAT NO. S-50-79, RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 8108120198, BEING A PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 25, TOWNSHIP 27 NORTH, RANGE 3 EAST, W.M., IN SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON. SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. Subdivision Guarantee/Certificate Printed: 08.17.17 @ 03:35 PM Page 3 WA-CT-FNRV-02150.624691-SPS-1-17-500058615 Packet Pg. 237 2.2.a GUARANTEE/CERTIFICATE NO. 500058615 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY SCHEDULE B GENERAL EXCEPTIONS A. Rights or claims of parties in possession, or claiming possession, not shown by the Public Records UPDATE 1 B. Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation, or adverse circumstance affecting the Title that would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the Land. C. Easements, prescriptive rights, rights -of -way, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, not shown by the Public Records. D. Any lien, or right to a lien, for contributions to employee benefit funds, or for state workers' compensation, or for services, labor, or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, all as imposed by law, and not shown by the Public Records. E. Taxes or special assessments which are not yet payable or which are not shown as existing liens by the Public Records. F. Any lien for service, installation, connection, maintenance, tap, capacity, or construction or similar charges for sewer, water, electricity, natural gas or other utilities, or for garbage collection and disposal not shown by the Public Records. G. Unpatented mining claims, and all rights relating thereto. H. Reservations and exceptions in United States Patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof. I. Indian tribal codes or regulations, Indian treaty or aboriginal rights, including easements or equitable servitudes J. Water rights, claims or title to water. Subdivision Guarantee/Certificate Printed: 08.17.17 @ 03:35 PM Page 4 WA-CT-FNRV-02150.624691 -SPS-1 -17-500058615 Packet Pg. 238 2.2.a GUARANTEE/CERTIFICATE NO. 500058615 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY SCHEDULE B (continued) SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS UPDATE 1 No search has been made as to property taxes and assessments. Property taxes and assessments will be searched upon request. Covenants, conditions, restrictions, recitals, reservations, easements, easement provisions, dedications, building setback lines, notes, statements, and other matters, if any, but omitting any covenants or restrictions, if any, including but not limited to those based upon race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, familial status, marital status, disability, handicap, national origin, ancestry, or source of income, as set forth in applicable state or federal laws, except to the extent that said covenant or restriction is permitted by applicable law, as set forth on City of Edmonds Short Plat No. S-50-79: Recording No: 8108120198 Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto, as granted in a document: Granted to: The City of Edmonds, Public Utility District No. 1 of Snohomish County, and General Telephone Company o f the Northwest, Inc. Purpose: Ingress, egress and utilities Recording Date: May 4, 1981 Recording No.: 8105040217 Affects: As described therein Said above instrument supersedes that instrment recorded December 15, 1980, under Auditor's File Number 8012150166. Said easement contains a provision for bearing a proportionate or equal cost of maintenance, repair or reconstruction of said access and utilities by the common users. Release of Damages: Grantor: Robert Lee Wetter and Muriel Wetter Dated: October 15, 1970 Recording Date: October 26, 1970 Recording No.: 2170084 For: The location, establishment, construction, drainage and maintenance of said street Any rights, interests, or claims which may exist or arise by reason of the following matters disclosed by survey, Recording Date: March 19, 1981 Recording No.: 8103195019 Any rights, interests, or claims which may exist or arise by reason of the following matters disclosed by survey, Recording Date: May 28, 1981 Recording No.: 8105285006 Subdivision Guarantee/Certificate Printed: 08.17.17 @ 03:35 PM Page 5 WA-CT-FNRV-02150.624691-SPS-1-17-500058615 Packet Pg. 239 2.2.a GUARANTEE/CERTIFICATE NO. 500058615 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY SCHEDULE B (continued) Pending probate proceedings in the estate of Name of decedent: Date of death: County: Court: Case No.: Personal Representative(s) Attorney for the Estate: Leo William LeFevre March 16, 2017 Snohomish Superior 17-4-00638-31 Annette M. Kessler Matthew R. Hendricks UPDATE 1 The personal representatives) has been granted non-intervention powers to sell, convey or mortgage the Land Possible lien against the estate of Leo William LeFevre, deceased, in favor of the State of Washington, Department of Social and Health Services, for recovery of costs of medical care provided, if any. The lien of any state or federal estate tax by reason of the death of a former owner of said Land, Decedent: Leo William LeFevre 10. The Company's liability for this report is limited to $1,000.00. This report is based on the company's property records, and no liability is assumed for items misindexed or not indexed in the public records, or for matters which would be disclosed by an inquiry of the parties in possession or by an accurate survey or inspection of the premises. This report and the legal description given herein are based upon information supplied by the applicant as to the location and identification of the premises in question, and no liability is assumed for discrepancies resulting therefrom. This report does not represent either a commitment to insure title, an examination of, or opinion as to the sufficiency or effect of the matter shown, or an opinion as to the marketability of title to the subject premises. END OF SCHEDULE B Subdivision Guarantee/Certificate Printed: 08.17.17 @ 03:35 PM Page 6 WA-CT-FNRV-02150.624691-SPS-1-17-500058615 Packet Pg. 240 2.2.a geoAdvantage: Snohomish County of Washington State (App4) Page 1 of 1 16 17 % , .6, 5 3-038 -!EL� 3436 (5156) 7 SP f - Z:: 22 21 24 19 J a L� ' 00 N 24 CD 3 2 � 3 �— O a �i 4 r A CD 31 13 �l IT ( J Bl�i 30 3 ,�, a. 1 11 10 ILI , 3 2 1 I 14 g 33, 34 ry p� 3- 43 3- �� T T 3-Cl$8 0 38 35 R) LL 3 C�B9y�ri 1 11 1E1 6 ? 17 IIJ X. 13 TO e ^ TJ7 r w y 14 2 rn 11 c 1 F 13 cam, h cc 1301 a 3-064 1 i 3 � r, '. ��'� � 17 1t1 0 12 14thr Way"urY a r V) v This map/plat Is being furnished as an aid in locating the herein described land in relation to adjoining streets, natural boundaries and other land, and Is not a survey of the land depicted. r Except to the extent a policy of title Insurance is expressly modified by endorsement, If any, the +� company does not Insure dimensions, distances, location of easements, acreage or other matters shown thereon. ® geoAdvantageW 6� E V V yr v http://geo.sentrydynamics.net/WA_Snohomish/default.aspx 5/ Packet Pg. 241 2.2.a ,ram' "*"T• �r++ . _ -, ., , .. — -- - - vAYCN %1kat ObS tt%;'k ! aft tL`3 et tte-'d `aa}1 1T.;i;;.:7 t "A") ana 44 4*11 w 9" PEL�i[tN' "dot then 6so"atoea of the 14moode SubAirtaton Ordinance (90c.L2,10) .„aWAjost to the fot1owI4 conditions sod requ€roomtet i a1t" ABroereot fl;i t� u be provided 1n dceordence with Ordinance 91387 required, erl�t% building aunt t t . NO "LU TAX RUU AUG 13 MI ALL REQUIREWNTS MOIST BE MET AND ALL IMPROVEMENTS MOST BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO < ISSUANCE Of BUILDING, PERMITS. 1/w certify that I/we are the legal owner(@) of She property described ebove. I/we raerrant that all representations are true and correct and understsnd that in the event of say adtrepreaentation or failure to comply with the conditions and regulations set forth herein, the City of Edoonde shall have the right to declare the fuhdivision void seed record a stateaant to that effect in the Grantor -Grantee's Index in the office of �� Sacbosish County Auditor, ORIZED -J�l FOR SIGNED:____ - RECORDING CITY F EQN10NDS By Page Of A, UJ►TED this AZZ14 day of ;4 `e + _^19 ? 1 STag OF WASHINCTON Coumn OF SNOROKISH On this day personally appeared efore meT� �/� c� i✓y_�r2.i , to me known to be the .individuals described In and who cuted the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that signed the aase as , 1 ,free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and pu therein mentioned. Givens ^ y wand and official seal this4,4day of L % j, Notary P in and for the State of Washington 4 residing at'— jr� 1201 �4 8 rvvi i7i9PAeti792 Description: Snohomish,WA Document,- Year.Date.DoclD 1981.812.198 Page: 1 of 5 Order: 70070814 Comment: - --. Packet Pg. 242 2.2.a .. ri • :.Yt _ *u Xulltt 83.iA"d all POtsaas my present or subsequsnt � ��:11� VWFAMObip tatt►mt is these l"do, and the suo°ssean "d ! pa , ss °!s$ ox atr perGiaa bAVtA& My said >;atesa4a, silelt 3t lnl4 Aiwa , N sZ a�l�rfsss =se isers ifo� h�• • t _. i s s�i> ►' eaoasl,ewed wage sae Is the toMe to adjacent land 4T° �= � �aots by aea� si the eesrtrtietaaa, � OWgtieao &Ad Mctutwwscs of the draiw4e syetea and hereby vaive and release the City of g*Mda from any and all claim _ for dosagea, saceluding d"age caused solely by an act or ' misei°a of said City and injunctive rr+lief which the ors, or their oueeessors.,or assigns, nay themselves have now or in the future by raastm of the construction, maintenance and operation of said drainage system, o Aly�il(�R���b �•• 4 It j r _ 6 ?) . w�wt�aa..wm...wr�rM�w•.fr: ..FWrsfl�•. �!'LLYPi•..•oM .. .. ,. .. .. .-r ._ IV41'/•_!,•rvr�.'+1•+./L'�� Description: Snohomish,WA Document- Year.Date.DocXD 1981.812.198 Page: 2 of 5 Order: 70070814 Comment: Y Packet Pg. 243 2.2.a 9well-gati*rIand Associates, Inc, Q� &.i3A1 NM �!I LEC,AL DESCRIPTIONS FOR LE FEVRE 5ti0RT RWIYI310N UV C ERK �.F;d :ertx E.71•t ale, r.det�:gtdn April 24, 1981 L5A Flls .lo. 79.355 t l That portion of the eouth"st quarter of the northeast quarter of the souMeest quarter of 5ictlpn 25, Township 27 North, Range ) East W.M., described as follows; Com"ming at the southwest corner of said suWlvision; thence N i`0V28" E, along the west line of said eub- division, a distance of 140.00 feet to the Im Point of Beginning of this description; thenos continuing N 1008128" E, along the west line of said subdivision, a distance of 60,00 feett thence S 88'22126" E, parallel with the south ling of said subdivision, a distance of 100.26 Tow then= S 16)7134" W,� a distance of MOO feed thence S W22126" E, a diaranos of 25.00 feet; thence S 11137134" V, a distance of 35.00 feet; thence N W 22'26" W, a distance of 124.75 feet to the True Point of Beginning, SUBXCT TO the terms and conditions of that certain Notice of Easement and Maintenance Agreement'Piled under Auditor's File No. 8105040217, records of Snohomish County, Washington. PARCEL 2 That portion of the saithwest quarter of the northeast quarter of the southwest quarter of Section 25, Township 27 North, Range 3 East W.11,, described as follows; Conmsencing at the southwest corner of said subdivision; thence N 1" 01Z8" E, along the west line of said sub- division, a distance of 7�-OO feet to the True Point of Beginning of this description; thence continuing N 1108128" E, alonq the west line of said subdivision, a distance of 65.00 feet; thence S 88622126" E, parallel with the south line of said subdivision, a distance of 124,75 foot to an intersection with a curve having a radius of 257.79 feet, from which intersection the radius point of said curve bears N 89022126" W; thence southerly, along the are of said curve, being a curve to the right and consuming a central angle of 14136109", a distance of 65,70 feet; thence N 86422126" W, a distance of 115.87 feet to the True Point of Beginning. r SUBJECT TO the terms and ;conditions of that certain Notice of Easement and Maintenance Agreement filed under Auditor's File No. 8105040217, records of Snohomish County, Washington, PARCEL 3 That portion of the southwest quarter of the northeast quarter of the southwest quarter or Section 25, Township 27 North, Range 3 East described as follows; Beginning at the southwest corner of said sub- division; thence N 1408'j8" E, along the west line of said subdivision, a dlstan^e of 75.00 feet; thence 5 88.22'26" E, parallel with the south line of said subdivision; a distance of 115.97 feet; thence 5 16,13143" W, a distance of 77.50 feet to an intersection with the south line of said subdivision, thane N 88.22'26" W, along said south line, a distance of 95.70 feet to the point of beginning. e;TY OF T TO the ts.ms and conditions of that certain Notice of Easement P.•#N, DEPT. ENA1 Agreement filed under Auditor's File No, 81050402171 EXAMINED Ad o ` ohomish County, Washington, NY 46MA OA?i t� %OLt4ARRa ' 7310e, 1QQTK W. EUM040e, WASH. 0020 PHONE 715 1b93 RIOS S 12 o 1 98 ►��� �z'E 17P# Description: Snohomish,WA Document - Year.Date.DoclD 1981.812.198 Page: 3 of 5 Order: 70070814 Comment: y. - , I Packet Pg. 244 2.2.a ;m,... �- �� Nle tsQr/i�;r lWtrt �tiv. T ,tpt'it' '�� l>Sa11 • . L:. .a' f+Da RttR ft t *wtwr 6f the Mw%mar t 4w1a�P$ 4f! f s 27 matt , P441 3 r4ra tart st tAs et quo "r of said - 'I r i, 44wq 04 amok lb" of sold sev* use o M 40A sdt� flit nslRtAsfllr k"o" ftt ['Ovlattn Nt. ?, id Mates K of puts# ft � 77, �� r tvw�oa m 17r6t#."a V, six <8 said rAw4b esly r It dtsmaw sd "T ro" to tAs True F01". of UstrAing of this t IFiadt p* J 17s09E'Sb# N, a distar�a.e of W.27 T"t to at vdt eba a�w i4ra of tM swonst eaa3 rpe tf tM ssutieaost o�251 th of thr re 2212 4uarter of said Section tSt theneQ 41 8d'22'26" W, ft 'latch' tint of *aid t49�divtstoee, to a faint which is 95.70 fact st Ow SWUM" coeW Of said subdivision; Owwo H 16-13'43" E, i $st+laot !f "'So fast to W Pslnt Of 74M of a Ourvc to the Left having sf4ftw of i37,79 fwtl thawee northerly, along tha arc of said carve to the i*fti ind DWAW ng a otnttal 4%10 of 14 36'09", an are distance of 65,70 ?A100 "WON N 103713411 E, a diatVM of )%.00 foot to the point of our" of A ON" to 00 right having a radius of :0.00 foot; thtnoo northerly, aloq tM arc of said curve to the rl,ght and consusdng a central wigle of 90►04'00", an an distanoa of 31.42 foot; thence S W 22'26" E, a distance of 17Y.77 feet to the true Point of leginning,, 81BZCT TO the tames and conditl-ins of that certain Notice of Easownt and H41nts s Agreeseent tiled uncer Auditor'a File No. 91050 0217, records of Snohomish County, Washington. r tr N e� �P++i sa lsa� AUTH0RIZED FOR C13'1 t1i 1 ;j\10N1)S 0 a GTY Of EDMONDS P, W, DEPT. BrGHEEMNU 0K w7u+eNnco w pAiL w1►iall! 7 nt D fn D . ti M Description: Snohomish,WA Document+'- Year.Date.DocID 1981.812.198 Page: 4 of 5 Order: 70070814 Comment: --_. t Packet Pg. 245 91F 'q- FMAMW Description: Snohomish,WA Document,- Year. Dat:e.DocXD 1981.812.198 Page: 5 of 5 Order: 70070814 Comment: Packet Pg. 246 2.2.a RECORDED REVISED . 1. MAY A PN Z. S7 NOTICE OF EASEMENT NO SALES TAX NEN .YMAIA p.huDITDR RE QUIRer) SN�iOMiSlI C�lN1Y WASfL AND Xz�MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT MAY 4 - 1981 r BNf 3 V R3, smh 'Sh C wk iife' t TO ALL WHOM THESE PRESENTS CONCERN: r Notice is hereby given that LEO WILLIAM I_EFEVRE and MARCARET GRACE Deputy. LEFEVRE,.his wife, owners of the following described properties, situated in the County of Snohomish, State of Washington, to wit: PARCEL 1 That portion of the southwest quarter of the northeast quarter of the southwest quarter of Section 25, Township 27 North, Range 3 East W.M., - deEpribod as follows: Commenoing at the southwest corner of said subdivision; thence N 1008128" E, along the west line of said sub- divAision, a distance of 140.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning of this description; thence continuing N 1008128" E, along the weslt line of said subdivision, a distance of 60.00 feet; thence S 88*22126" E, parallel with the south line of said subdivision, a distance of 100.26 feet; thence S 1037134" W, a distande.of 25.00 feet; thence S 88022126" E, a distance of 25.00 feet; thence S 1'037134" W, a distance of 35.00 feet; thence N 88*22126" W, a distance of 124.75 feet to the True Point of Beginning. PA CEL 2 G That portion of the southwest quarter of the northeast quarter of the southwest quarter of Section 25, Township 27 North, Range 3 East W.M., described as follows: Commencing at the southwest corner of said subdivision; thence N 1008128" E, along the west line of said subdivision, a distance of 75.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning of this description; thence continuing N 1008128" E, along the west line of said subdivision, a distance of 65.00 feet; thence S 88°22126" E, parallel with the south line.of said subdivision, a distance of 124.75 feet to an intersection with a curve having a radius of 257.79 feet, from which intersection the radius point of said curve bears N 88022,261, W; thence southerly, along the are of said curve, being a curve to the right and consuming a central angle of 1413610911, a distance of 65.70 feet; thence N 88022126" W, a distance of 115.87 feet to the True Point of Beginning. PARCEL 3 That portion of the southwest quarter of the northeast quarter of the soq.thwest quarter of Section 25, Township 27 North, Range 3 East W.M., described as follows: Beginning at the southwest corner of said subdivision; thence N 1*08128" E, along the west line of said sub- div'ision, a distance of 75.00 feet; thence S 88122126" E, parallel with the south line of said subdivision, a distance of.115.87 feet; thence S 16013143" W, a distance of 77.50 feet to an intersection With the south line.of said subdivision; thence N 88e22'26" W, along . said south line, a distance of 95.70 feet to the point of beginning. PARCEL 4 That portion of the south 200 feet of the southwest quarter of the northeast quarter of the southwest quarter of Section 25, Township 27 North, Range 3 East W.M., described as follows: Commencing at the northeast quarter of said south 200 feet; thence N 88122126" W, along the north line of said south 200 feet, a distance of 330.65 feet to an�intersection with the northerly prolongation of the westerly line A YGL 1708 PAGEJ198 0105 040217 98va p DO P` pv N O ti z tj N u3 Z a v 1 i l\ r k4* 'Vi > 5�f 0 r: > LL d ` J i to � Y l N 1 1 'r 1 E Ci d1 M1 � O !Z N s � A i I.: . •• r ; s K w r C V to Q Packet Pg. 247 t ' �- vx.....,.t:«n°w.,i".6v.�i...aa.,.:.�w-....,.. •.A ro;,w:v`: a..u�.i•b'.a::+srv..Sr.c„u._,.. .•._wS:-..., ..,.err _ ',trhi "}v��'T�� 6{.a'J� . • f � ' t y y i PARCEL 4 (Cont'd) +tY of'Sunset West Division No. 70 according to the plat thereof ^ recorded in Volume 35 of Plats, on page 77, records of Snohomish � y:< County, Washington; thence S 17002135" W, along said northerly N ( prolongation, a distance of 5.19 Peet to the True Point of Begin �� O r: Ing of this description; thence continuing S 17*02135" W, a distance gjti O *' of,202.27 feet to an intersection with the south line of the south- ti y` west quarter of the northeast quarter of the southwest, quarter of {{ O sa._jd Section 25; thence N 88°22'26" W, along the south line of said "� y, N subdivision, to a point which is 95.70 feet easterly of the south- ' Z 5 d ( #: west corner of said subdivision; thence N 16013143" E, a distance �" J of''77.50 feet to the point of curve of -a curve to the left having a radius of 257.79 feet; thence northerl along the arc of said curve , Ya 9 , � p a + Yk to the left and consuming a central angle of 14136'09", an are dis- O tance of 65.70 feet; thence N 1037'34" E, a distance of 35.00 feet h W to the point of curve of a curve to the right havinga radius ofd ,m -A'} ( I 20:00 feet; thence northerly, along the arc of said curve 'to the ; right and consuming a central angle of 90°00'00", an arc distance xy� .`k`�13iC s of 31.42 feet; thence S 8812212611 E, a distance of 179.77 feet to 7 j, the True Point of Beginning. &' , U) ri� \� {a�di do her4y reserve and convey unto the present and future owners, their heirs, 4`.'7� ', t5 successors and assigns, of the above described Parcels 1, 2, 3 and 4, and unto u w rry rdu' # d ! *s ,f THE CIT� OF EDMONDS, and unto PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 1 OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY, tryS{45 •, LL w%a 1, and unt¢ GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY OF THE NORTHWEST, INC., a permanent easement gllarrs� i for ingress and egress and for the installation, operation, maintenance, repair.a t4i�v`S�r(�s and/or 'reconstruction of utilities, over, under, across, through and upon the J 05. following described property, situated in the County of Snohomish, State of C Washington, to wit: � (D f ^;rfa2s That portion of the southwest quarter of the northeast quarter of the southwest quarter of Section 25, Township 27 North, Range 3Eatt �. , described coiner ofsaidsubdivision11thence Cm N1°08imencng at 28"E,along he Uthe west CV lihe of said subdivision, a distance of 200.00 feet; thence 1 ~ S P8022126" E, parallel with the south line of said subdivision, a distance of 100.26 feet; thence S 1037134" W, a distance of '... a n� ih1 4r$I 25.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning of this description; thence continuing S 1037134" W, a distance of 35.00 feet to the ^ x Aa ' Sa aint of curve of a curve to the right having a radius of 232.79 t (fixkro t a�) P 9 9 C1 �•� f; �(�r� feet; thence southerly, along the are of said curve to the right � and consuming a central angle of 1201.212811, an are distance of +• 49.60 feet to a point of compound curvature; thence southerly, ' Cb� aVng`the arc of a curve to the right having a radius of 20.00 ;ts +s rt Ate, feet and consuming a central angle of 77*4713211, an arc distance �O = of 27.15 feet; thence S 16013143" W, a distance of 18.00 feet to an intersection with a curve having aradius of 20.00 Peet from n which intersection the radius point of said curve bears S 16*13143" W; thence southeasterly, along the arc of said curve, being a curve to y. Q the right and consuming a central angle of 9000010011, an.are distance :tom�h S ,f'6*II Zll Nf16°13143'e'eE, ahdistance ence S 3of648.4611711 Efeet dtotthe e point ofof 4feet;hnce curveofa l.. curve to the left having a radius of 257.79 feet; thence northerly, P along the are of said curve to the left and consuming a central angle of 14-3610911, an arc distance of 65.70 feet; thence N 1037134" E, p a distance of 35.00 feet; thence N 88022126" W, a distance of 25.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning. �,�� a 1� + t ( Maintenance, repair and/or reconstruction of any roadway or utilities con t 3 x strutted or installed upon or within the easement reserved and conveyed herein, W shall tie the responsibility of and the costs of said maintenance, repair and/or y " Oh it ' reconstruction borne Jointly and equally by the present and future owners, their ` )` heirs successors and assi ns of the above described Parcels 1 2 and 3. ! G ' VOL 1.708 FAOEA998105040217 t > 1k w Packet Pg. 248 t 2.2.a fr0 ' f Y' U. r The execution and filing. of this instrument shall effectively invalidate that n , a certain Notice of Easement and Maintenance Agreement filed under Auditor's ..... le ; File No. 8012150166, records of Snohomish County, Washington. 00 cm This instrument shall be a covenant running with the land and shall be sSrt bindingAupon the parties hereto, their heirs,. successors and assigns, forever. In witness we hereunto set our signatures and seals this 28 day of p r' N ��� � ` APR L , 19e1. c` �r z ilk, h r r�i,' J o -to i r3�s LEO WILLIAM LEFEVRE MARGARET GRACE LEFEVRE+ f �yi tM'tl F�k A a 7 ,,yyyy� "k�1�3-'.ld ? J kf,h`Y Syr 4*z STATE OF WASHINGTON) LL f iws�t v a COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH) �iv. -i C f aE On this'day personally appeared before me LEO WILLIAM LEFEVRE and.MARGARET i t'tt 0 IT'i ` J 1 , GRACE LEFEVRE, his wife, to me known to be the individuals described in and atttE`�;, p fn who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that they �,h 'i C jtifA"�{ signed the same as their free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purpose's therein mentioned. C # 4i QIV�E4.4,nder my hand and official seal this a-e day of 4PA«- , 1981. xsr+ �z.<} �r x �) + Tyr , SaSI 9 �' •'>. > .cS1?r N r:i x"."s+a r V. Ens w )rvr X Notary lic in and for the State of Washington, residing at,.."'`'� ,,.� iit hY ��{: E r � V 4 tt _ .. 1 +M'n .. i f 111R rh T H x LU a t C +AY3�a nk! K7 t VOL 1708PAOEUOO ��S!}4rM f` •1 -8105040217 • Packet Pg. 249 77TT77M ® E E = TLC, Id F '0 NO SALES TAX 0 BE Z�; REQUIRLW 1­1 Cr U_j —ill NOTICE OF EASEMENT DEC 1.61980 W AND R YERS, S40homlsh GounV. Treasurar, V-4 92 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT 8 C) CO TO ALL WHOM THESE PRESENTS CONCERN: Notice Is hereby given that LEO WILLIAM LEFEVRE and MARGARET GRACE LEFEVR . E, his wife, owners of the following described properties, situated In the County of Snohomish, State of Washington, to wit: PARCEL I That portion of the southwest quarter of the northeast quarter of the so6thwest quarter of Section 25, Township 27 North, Range 3.East W.M.v described as follows: Commencing at the southwest corner of said subdivision;' thence N 110812811 E, along the west line of said sub- division, a distance of 140.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning of this description; thence continuing N 100812811 E0 along the west line of said subdivision, a distance of 60.00 feet; thence S 88022126". E, parallel with the south line of said subdivision, a distance of 100.26 feet; thence S 1*3713411 W, a distance of 35.00 Peet; thence S 88*2212611 E, a distance of 25.00 feet; thence 5 11037134I W, a distance of 25.00 feet; thence N 88022120 W,, a, distance of 124.75 feet to the True Point of Beginning. PARCEL 2 That portion of the southwest quarter of the northeast quarter of the southwest quarter of Section 25, Township 27 Northy,Rahge 3 East W.k.v described as follows: Commencing at the southwest corner of said subdivision; thence N 11 08 12811 E, along the. west line of said subdivision, a distance of 75.00 feet to the True Polit.of Beginning: of this description; thence continuing, N 10 0812811 E, along the west - line line of said subdivision, a distance of 65.00 feet .thence 5 8802212611 El parallel with -the south line of said subdivision, a distance of.124;75 feet to an intersection with a curve having, a radius, of .257.79 feet, from which intersection the 'radius point of said curve bears N 8802212611 W thence southerly, along the are of said curve, being a curve to the right and consuming . g a central angle.of 14036109",-d distance of 65.70 feet; thence N 88*2212611 Wi a distance. of 115i8Z.feet.to the -True Point of.Beginning PARCEL 3 That,portlon of the southwest quarter of.the 'northeast -quarter of the southwest quarter of Section 25, Township 27 Northi Range 3 East W a4., described as followsi Beginning at. the southwest corner 6f'said:.. subdivision; thence N 1'08128".Ei along the west lineof. said. sub:- diVision,. a distance of 75.00 feet; thence S. 880 22.12611 E, parallel: V with.the south line of said subaivisionp.adistance of,115.87 feet; p thence S 16013143" Wya distance of 77.50-feet to an.intersbeii on ..... .. ... with the south line of said subdivisionl.thenbe,N 88.22-2611 W, along said south line, a distance of 95.70 feet to the point of beginning. e ....... . . . . . PARCEL 4 That portion of the south 200 feet of the southwest quarter of the northeast quarter of the southwest quarter of Section 25, Township 27 Noritfi, Range 3 East W.M., described as follows: Commencing at the northeast quarter of said south 200 feet; thence N 8802212611 W, along. the north line of said south 200 feet, a distance,of 330.65 feet to an Intersection with the northerly prolongation of the westerly line dW �801 21501 66 VOL 1693 PAGEDW . . . . . . . . . . o J N, Packet Pg. 250 2.2.a Z 7 PARCEL 4 (Cont'd) , ,rr s:pt of Sunset West Division No. 7, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 35 of Plats; on page 77; records of Snohomish 1 ' County, Washington; thence S 17102'35" W, along said northerly {: c f ' ` pnolongation, a distance of 15.56 feet to the True Point of Begin= Y' ing of this description; thence continuing S 17002135" W, a distance ,f of.191.90 feet. to an intersection with the south line of the south- zZ> A west,quarter of .the northeast quarter of the southwest quarter of (('+d( sc as said Section 25; thence N 88022126" W, along the south line of said subdivision, to a point which is 95.70 feet easterly of the south- weGst corner of said subdivision; thence N 1611314311 E, a distance r , #;; of 77.50 feet to the point of curve of a curve to the left having a ty-i radius of 257.79 Peet; thence northerly, along the are of said curve t p't ei to the left and consuming a central angle of 14036'09", an are dis- (tE r i ; tince of 65.70 Peet; thence N 1137134" E a distance of 25.00 feet ha wAMi{ { to the point of curve of a curve to the right having a radius of Hsu' ay 2d.00 feet; thence northerly, along the are of said curve to them right and consuming a central angle of 90*0010011, an arc.distance } o1A 31.42 feet; thence 5 88022126" E, a distance of 177.01'Peet to" tfe True Point of Beginning. do hereby reserve and convey unto the present and future owners, their heirs, , 4 successors and assigns, of theabove described Parcels 1, 2, 3 Wand 4, and unto is gr�t'rtl SE"x5d1i TI IG CI1rY .OF EDMONDS; and unto PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT- NO:, 1 OF''�SNOHONISH"COUNTY' t } (. and unto GENERAL. TELEPHONE COMPANY. OF THE NORTHWEST, INC., -a permanent easement rYrif E for ingress and egress and for the installation,;.operation, maintenance, repair i and/or ueconstruction of utilities, over, under, across, through and upon the r f a"t'r„��r ,fir 1� ifvr following described property, situated in the County of Snohomish, State of tti� fit, Washington, to .wit: That portion of. the southwest quarter of.the northeast quarter of r�z the southwest quarter of Section 25x Township 27 North, Range 3 East W.M:, described as follows:,.Commehcing at the .southwest corner of said subdivision; thence N 1°08128" E, along the west 1: ' f line of :said subdivision, a.distance of 200.00 feet; thence toy t,y s ' +,J j a distanceof!100r261feet;tthence h the sS.u1°37i34"th lne �W,s6 distanceaid iofon� k;r t"r 35M feet to the True Point of Beginning of this description, 1 YF k rfikF' ss n ` thence: continuing S 113713.411.W, a distance of 25.00 feet to-the of curve. of a curve .to the right having a radius.; of 232.79 feet; thence southerly,,along.the are of said curve to the right and consuming a central angle- of 120 1212611, an arc distance: of ` , � z , .• s;; , 49,.60 feet to a point of compound curvature; thence southerly, F;c }itl ' along the arc .of, a curve to the right haw ing a radius of '20'.00 feet and consuming a central angle of 77 47.32 , an are distance g; l(V. � r�1> 1 of 27:15 Peet; thence S.16"13'43" W, a distance of 18.00 feet to s{h7 r a am intersection with a curve.havin a radius of 20.00 feet 'Prom � i33 �, It '� g. o + n-. dixsfiv-- ��'�tfy wht ch intersection the radius point of said'curve bears S 16 13 43 W, 2.yt iy3 A. 2 n; 1,T"k sit thence southeasterly, along: the are of said' curve; being a,:curve to:rix ++ ,, fit ! the: right and consuming a,central'angle of 900,00'0011, an arc distance ofp3' 31:42'feet; ! thence S 73"46'17'E;.a distance of 20.14 Peet, thence N d6°143'! E, a distance of 48 46 feet to the poiht`oP curve of .a' curve to_ the left'having a radius of 257.79 feet; thence northerly, (r along the arc..of said curve to the left and consuming a central ,.4 angle of 14°36'09", an are distance of 65:70..feet; thence .:N"1°37'34'!'E, a distance of 25.00 feet; thence N:88°22'26" W,.a distance of 25.b0 �+ feet to the True.Point of Beginning:' Maintenance, repair and/or reconstruction of any,roadway or utilities con- .' 1 7 `: �r structed or installed upon or. within the easement reserved and conveyed. herein, .. We �c shall bt the responsibility of and the costs of said.maintenance,'repair and/or $'r reconstruction borne jointly and equally by the present and future owners; their. . � `r heirs,.successors and assigns, of the above described Parcels .l,'2 and. 3.- ', va i693ME,9i38 . M21%i 66 \� ze. d. 00 N O O ti O N Z J a O (n O s � LL Q r_ r.+ K LU d V M a Packet Pg. 251 2.2.a ®E r wfi ��G�Yt�1 �R,tkF sx Wawa .7i��nud0?Gxubak.pa4w+ivilaSrY�iM 4?'bs!k7#+l�/nh Sfrti1:$'BY�F�tx L _ � ''�^tl� 1 5 �43 }ii �yrP 1' a •t )7 } tt i This instrument shall be a covenant running with the land and shall be binding upon the parties.hereto, their heirs, successors and assigns, forever, In'witness w1e hereunto set our signatures and seals this day of ;a, ca r 1980. rti LEO WILLIAN i LarEVRE MARU KL GRACE CEVEVRE .,STATE OF WASHINGTON) ' COUNTY?OF SNOHOMISH) On this day personally appeared before me LEO WILLIAM LEFEVRE and MARGARET 6GRACE LEFEVRE,.his wife, to me known.to be the individuals described in and sy who, executed the within and foregding instrument; and. acknowledged Lhal''.lihey signed the same as their:'free'and'voluntary act' and 'deed, for the uses'.and ;t. purposes therein mentioned. GIVEN under ,my hand and official seal this of r`eday of—�«nr NUir u' ; p Rr•r t `G Notary P a !q +� w c.in and for the State: of t Washingt residing at q. W. a. M. Packet Pg. 252 _. I, a YT+C A19 'OEM 1 � Z1 fi4a oranto :Ri heHln ..1ACl1 �sAxt:.IEF...Afi i' x _... —M- y• � t rA 'th hohrlderattoh of mtltpAl t�;r�e�'], SfB .... 4� W„„ .. No ntdpi aY Nhletr p itttor Omotttrdad nti. tditi� of h+notltr:t6 aceeu�cy.,•-,..—..4 radoohAf lilt -;t' 7. 1 dd! ",NitilllYhintn pu$t[n triad tttiouth thElr' Pioport3;99rnd wfif tae dEb4r(ue8 do�8 adhvW, Ntaaai and lkwatm to.LU i*y of rthdonde, btilh of wufdnXtgq Tor tho t4ldhMe , as putdi9Vded. ` :nd' Idltt.*r wh C-11- tit dwAod real-eaWo, lnolVht hiy lnlltoit th ra tdy i}Iiy7Shh.Aer aoyul{ti, Hier The': NorVh �25 feet ,of the Ust feet of the 0 south 200 Skit of the' Solithireet j''b the Narthts&Ot } of thet'seuthtreht 3 or Settion 2$0 bh P 27 Ndrthl f Rat16e' Ba'at, V M, t lees. roediry knoxn 6�'.9ih Ave $outh t• w. 1 I t NO VA'i '1'AK a i��Qt11R�t� Niiieir , 'd� tts ;' .. {'. • . .. - - , ills s it . t Fitdale� do Yh8 Ctwn4i'bk9ggh �t!}te�gt R'oe1+In8.tgfw - , . . ., ., ; � t[bh 6ranlot/i pttehy acre Ind oorietak to th! eetablGlugent 0[ roaldtpad m utvayed Intl M tR�dtB.'in. iha � Rlly oCidPodBdY Enylnter" atflMaa auiivbpN �" 6t+,d to thxpetphtuhl 7tdntAAanco of tho ptund ne.'6.�lY r ... I Bhrot4 t t d wafat to Halm 3grpemet of whalenee klnd NYftlh tldny 0a o¢fNlobtd t A41949 63en71 byl tie I.WI tt I.; eta6u.hhengMeolutruett9}%amn eiod rde[ote{t4hh'o of Mrd eirdif, gndatrla- 0dto.Ota to thdtltht of Ni City to :; i rdeita W neeea uyatopeeYarcU4read allte w,MAWet they a*hntl beyond the rlth"r-W y pae, upgq OAV. m odanpa e! ee4 W fqxo4t tauty with, tiadgta Pt*vUge• oe Otty i5tfxi adatruan aMd o the a WMEli4ta pakpole ar Y } ' th Hot. ltpail VogtrQpW be MgMred AY Wade}nhttlan VWieOP.t det Et*6ht llotnati/. owutenof Wo.11wo (((( $audcovininkeAia ktta with th6 ta6d etd 6e.L1dGbg upb, ttte ythntot _ eUetlebeorh qr hedptna IbototSe_' r Y .4 a '4.,. . P •wa suwi its :v s�, Y��' �t {� .� r'�t Packet Pg. 253 . . I; R'C.hT16 ,File wAsliYttdYON, a " . CoLhffir or On thlo.«„„..._„,:..„ „. day eY._.„...,...R.......,,.....„„„,.„,.,.. 1,0„„ beCocd silo lha ' undanlgnsdr a fialnry k"uLlle In and roe the. etatd• at Wuktnatew„ duty coinm{ulaned end aWeta4 pdhimilly6.Me i' to the kneWn 1. tie.the•....:.-...............„...-......_..,.... •„y...M ,,,..„_ pr Ihd ..„,,.... thy Corporatlob that,edeouted the wlthtn and f"Mfic hotmme,44ids (' acknoWlid$ed the aatd tnatre(nent td e'a 'the tree pad volanta'cy set eha deed, at :R1d' Cerpdrattdd ur the pe end purpeeea therein fnehtloatd aria Wt caot m 4tod that _be.,_ W.„..:,.„.....»„ aathotlted to ofeute. veld InetWmEny.aryd, [Let the eesbattlied #P theaeafot Balal:ortihrittoa: , IN iVrMpIla wire awm I Im. hereuhtd 44 any hated and arflxed lhy seal the'dey ind� yeir th'thls dkttltlrate ' above Wrltled. - Notaryl ablieln ii4d tor,thd etet$ot wuhl0htodeeeldlha tt,,._,.,,,„„.,,�..,,,,.«,,,,,ew„„„„,,.^M_ . 1 ; Ry'ATb7 OM WAslm-r6�a,'oi5j� j - ... ' honNiiF N taryr ft�(HV�t{*yQ.. 3 a l ro to to Ok . Wlti!Wgt�onydilly amrnlwl hao anj1��nvom pe�acl!atly...tya ;.�T•yk' 4(�4��( , .v.�",��r�„„�„,'�"m!3 U't ! �✓lj•a !'�'� _: %d �me. knaxT'.'t hd th} !{1dl�IpilYL.tj r` t I aeaodked,ln p d exo ted thb wlthtn /natruman4tad aalmewiedged tp pia th-U..y.,, e i .. . eka�:ame ae r..� ,-, ,.. xraa•aMtT'ye untPry aet'and deed tot, Uld hhtand pueyosaa ltl40manitwG6i �' witness hry hand 0d seal tH� day+aa yarstret•atw rrrtiiea.. '`" 7,� 13� " Notary POUn 14 bid for she Otate 0.. fvtL.*J- P, taalMnt at- r - ca �r NE o e� j• U�YlVeYYily Cede;al $Av In" at 'tAah As000latloh - - I I it$'0 N.S. 45Ch 9CteaC °- SO#tloj. Wi hitigton VhX05 m . 6 4 W{GIAL RWQhs . e - KV Irm • � r"�° ,t � �rs� � e Co N O O ti N Z --' J a o A { O d LL d C cv J Y •. c d N rn c CD t Q . t - Oi N ' LL Cn sr: LU � 1 E z Q Packet Pg. 254 2.2.a P IN i ' N g z 0 a z a NI 0 o Z ( Z O a Z �Z SZ-41 IV ~ 3 z o ?6 z o z to ... !. L.� W N N wN�W o (0 2!, " J w iti ? 2 f i;�jll sz 5i Dgd��o e 5Q.° pn 8 � p _ W 'g 00'St $ .OG'69.1 N. � ... 8 w O > Z N 4 .00'se ,OaG2 �}(ssioslega •soBe°.eijai s w w o o 4 W Z 0 3 1� NFIV n wO N Nl-4,w� z " c_i Z FWo�F� ' 00'09 00'99 00'SL _ ,0000Z 3.BZ of N 0• w oz 3 t�J Q F Z. L O W 4L O Z d o q z t- o oo z aa�w°p� tl° W �u y J�o3tn�m3 Nz .r z �O LLJ U` cr— z g N w W t > Lj— N U�J J 0 d a 0z � z D ( o W o � ¢o z Z zy a rP.. t 1 - R. Packet Pg. 256 v 2.2.a n 1�yyy ' 1 ' z Z O N r,. z W ,• V yski'�'% e � :• X Y��a1,M( ylai at�A '' �RYr ,ji 7Ai I' �{ I �I J I I t Z I 1 : I I y� _k x� ' i • 4� t 1- a I 1 a I I I � t rt z l •I . 1 W I O I 1 W C\9 7 W J N a W Z I I' a - z a o w F- °99 lo4ipl A., r7� ,i� ' trM tfiH d r-IIW.urcM ._ : r-^y. �•' , t t I: 1 i '� Vt r hC}A # '� 4 iwu f e �,Fa.��i �1 Packet Pg. 257 N N Z � O a �Q�. S 3f1N3ne rrLB�po � a On f- ��d'ld N.I.L. 'F / RX 1 62 62I QI l i r z �. L71 •O m / z 0100 z 00'Q9 009L O'O02 31N,'.' 1-3:31,j" i 1`1 0 s 3 N to �... 4 wN 1 Q. 8 o NY P 31Zo— °a a in uO M e M= in W�ti �` z3 0 � s N! 8 } W t 3 N 1J z a a LL) a . 0 ° $ a Q p d a LL 3 �1W�1 W m W Z Z Z` pa 0 a �� W u Z Z Z cn n�3 tt � R Satz. o:^ Qzzm z& r.a 3 �' g C FF oQW Hill, "u,10 Oo0Z z �FNgN E g a ��z>3'g a603BGs 03 a z z �F3.�oQ�m$4Fld F �S{d{..pzt�( Q Wz �gWp0 5€� aNWZOz F�Zopp� 4WF�a �jW�N Wa o o ld SSW W ZF ��JJY' J R J �tlO�Fz-d �j� Qa7 FZN_zI.-Ipp�W 2 h j p l 0 W�z . a 8 € Packet Pg. 258 2.2.a Case Detail for Case #17-4-00638-31 - WA - Snohomish County Superior Court Page 1 of 2 Date & Time Performed: Mon May 15 2@17 08:54:20 PST Search Title: 1740063831 - WA Superior Snohomish County Order Number: Search Type: Case Number Case Type: Probate WA - Snohomish County Superior Court Case #17-4-00638-31 SCOMIS DATA . NAMES Total participants: 5 q LEFEVRE LEO WILLIAM --__o1e'—: Role: -- -� ,.., _,: ir);: :. Deceased (DEC01-_._��.� KESSLER ANNETTE1 _......._.._.,,__ _. _ _ ... __ ...r-----..4.... ---- _ __m HENDRICKS, MATTHEW R. Role Attorney (AY01).. .. ___....... .... Firm: Hendricks Bennett Bar#: 20824 w... PLLC ,. .._...._..._._. ..,; ................ 11/0$/1991, .....J._ __._ µEmail• _ ., -..__. Fax # (425) 670-8138 Address #:-Hendricks Bennett PLLC 402 5th Ave S d Edmonds, WA 98020-3402 United States Reference Source WA Bar Association FOR PET00001 Role: NOTE KESSLER. ANNETTE Role: Personal Representative (REPO1) ODYSSEY DATA KESSLER, ANNETTE M, Role: � m petitioner N mmAttorney Lead Attorney Info: Hendricks, Matthew R. e Retained Work Phone 425-775-2751 Fax Phone KESSLER, ANNETTE M m..._ Ro..leb. :. � Personal Re p resentative _ LEFEVRE, LEO WILLIAM a .,... Role: Deceased DOCKET & ODYSSEY DATA DOCUMENTS Download Electronic Documents The following documents are available in electronic format from the court. Select checkboxes for documents you wish to download, then click "Get Documents." (Documents marked: with a green checkmark are documents you have already downloaded. Click the "Go To Viewable Documents" button to retrieve them again, at no charge.) Select Date Description Comment ( I 04/06/2017Case Information Cover Sheet r] � 04/06/2017 . ...... _® https://hana.courttrax.com/clientServices/index.pl?choice=Saved%20Search&fro... 5/1packet Pg. 259 Case Detail for Case #174-00638-31 - WA - Snohomish County Superior Court 2.2.a Page 2 of 2 r 04/06/2017, Last Will and Testament 04/06/2017, Order Admitting Will ----- ����_ w"� o4/66/2017 .. .Oath Q w,....... 04/06/2017 _. ..: _ _... . __._ . . _... _. _ .__..,. .._.... __.._ __._ ..... __ ., __ _ w._._ �...... ......._..... Letters Testamentary „__. . 04/06/2017' Notice to Creditors ...._.. _...,_._..,... 04/24/2017 Creditor's Claim .:.-- ..-r.._ --..._ i NOTE: "The Washington State Administrative Office of the Courts and the Washington State courts do not warrant that the information is accurate or correct and deny liability for any damages resulting from the release or use of the data. In order to assure or verify the accuracy of the information or data received, the customer should personally consult the 'official' record reposing at the court of record." End of Report Copyright 2016 CourtTrax Corporation - info@courttrax.com C https:Hhana.courttrax.com/'lientServices/index.pI?choice=Saved%2OSearch&fro... 5/ packet pg. 260 2.2.a WAWilM M"TMA UIVM M AN Yt Requed d toset Dank of C*M"rcc 1". 0. fwx 230 t rank{ vut VOL. .1w'ACIR p.NCOAIQrst! RDT7 OF p+raia,uir�lt {stl! ittt'tt ttaittt u�.rer+a ^^N«ry &RCI JUN 191973 . STAMM DUBUQUE AUDITOR SNOHOMM COUNTY. WASH. 40"WA vaM0 "ecorta3 � riWRt eae TM CIA?o"1[A9t CUUM `Cs 1tttt8t !WM, go hit aepsrete *State kT "it of to AM Rollo* to sees Ma* Mmol warm" 16 LZD,srMUM U VMS and NUMIR CUM Ltt YtM, big *mile, eka {isrrawat 0. LaFt '*0p&q4 anrt• , ri d 1a tw Cry of 0 p 0 a C M I Is it ► VAW it, Tfat jortiois of the South 200 t~st of she soutwesat vwrttr of the ftirthosat ataartoft of to tieetwtst latter ttetr of soltdaa 23, rowwhip 17 Bagtb, Unto 3 Seats VA., described es telloa 1 NmnAaaiee at the Hast%emat eor,Ar of amid Stub M toots thonce 1%vtb.4Sol$#63e Voot, parallel with she $out& 11"M *it tali Ooetth"at quarter of tbt Northeast "actor of tba 8a�stirese 4rarcer, 330.63 test to the txaa potet of T,estnntnal tkoace Centime Mang sold item MIS lees, +ire or loss, to the vast item* of amid sootbu,"t quarter of Nowtiaow quarter at a+40woot gaerter, thence Booth 2Q0 twat along amid hest Attu to the Saattbftst corms- of amid atibdivLotems thence South 800141439'"4 +storm Ow South Use of amid ee441teiataa, 269.10 foots tbaue Mocthosaterly to the true point of twr8t sytf 8r£M that porktow at the North 23 feet ecmrsyed to the City of 14weda by desd *worded vow*r ATdttor's s'iis 'Pa. 2170094. litmste to tits Cauaty of 8nabwdsh, state of Reshtoyton. ST k+ a • r ... r oo as coµ ,-^^^ ." « i$YttV0y8riCft a L Tax 0 tilts: Cii �MYi pow Wo 2dEA dsy tie iota, 1041 $TAT% OF WASH1ir1t i` N. t a+ • f yya 1 ws kwwww ** C. 9latschaoasr MiCaRw this eltt{e@e Zed km*kc h ^ W ad t to yY� he arw 04 "V 0 his have sFd vahowy su aw 4"0' &M {ka IYRp ,CId't ep!'WM the wka awaie*ML f. " esiAs ielta+luad oftw *rains& kith *11 J4tr34, 197. i 3 ,3S',1 Doc: WASNOH:PREC 2301961-53061 krisciark, Printed: 5/12/20171.07 PM Packet Pg. 261 1I 5/12/2017 11:21 AM DoC: SN:1985 8503150325-53061 Packet Pg. 262 1 1 2.2.a 'Ma1 t , "Ali Exhla'it 9'l,Wi rwn1 prapuity 1Yaotdit in soohoolel, L:,nn y, state Of Wdoli LP1 0111 i, v�sJ idaully duxu`rJ4V4 Su tollowei s Iliat ;Stile„ of the Su th 211U raai Of taw southw¢sC quurtar or tiro Or Suction 25, luwushly 27 nurthtaat atuortur of tt,u Souutwost quattar COON ViarytR Wrtt}, Nun, tl' 3 C st W.N., dea0tloed as fallawst (Wing at naythudst.yuarter of -Said South 2W3 root; thence tl 86*22426" lota[ialfj `. tiw:nurih Attic of Sald Sa+th 2W tact, a dtStawe of 330.65 taut to :fir:p ':!. art lntersaytlan with the notthorty psalunviitlan of the Weatafly 11414 at 3Unadt vast 0ivlalon Ha7, aco+irgittg to the Plat tharaof -" racurded in Volume 35 of Plata, 00 Ppaage 77, records of Snohomw County, WdlShington) th¢na¢ S 175023Sa it *icing said nartrvj'ly `z prola,gatiiiP', O dlst,lncs of 5,19 toot to the arise. Paint af;6ogin- �. W, a disnao ing or this d¢sariptl0ni thence continuing 8 IlitpI3Sw ta d02 27 teat to an intwraection kith the Sotath lino of the' South. �r01 1 of rust qua"ty of the northeast quarter at, the awiLhwat quarter of, > said suction 25t thonoo N 99»22t26" W, along the tauth line of Said to a whlch'is 95.70 tact eaStorly of the south. g a y� 6ultdivlst0q, paint w¢ot carnpr of said-sulatvlaloni "nce d 16*1PO" C. it distance ° or'77.50 Peat to trial point of curve at a Ourvc to the left Having 4 • '.: rddlus of 2S7.79 feet; d,enco northerly, along the Oro of said "rvo to the lcr¢ and consuming a -control "to of 14136+09d an eta 414- y" ' Ca sco of 65.70 touts, thona0 li 14094 , a 44Stance or 35:00 teat �1 to the point, of curve of a curve to this rlght having a raolus of ,t x 20.60 tuct thence nertlwrly along the arc of Bald ovrva 40 the _ sight ant Bening a Call to* an la or W 00,04it, an ai•a dltit.noa of 1s.42 t at$ thanoo 6 44"W26" go a dlataaoe Of 179,77 feat to ? the true Point of 1lcolnullntl+ 5/12/2017 11:21 AM Doc: 5N:1985 8503150325-53061 Packet Pg. 263 2.2.a of EDAM #P71 CITY OF EDMONDS FstENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST niz z=2W Purpose of Checklist: � S�RVIC�r The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governiti& >?�lt� consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) mus 13e prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Use of checklist for nonproject proposals: For nonproject proposals complete this checklist and the supplemental sheet for nonproject actions (Part D). the lead agency may exclude any question for the environmental elements (Part 13) which they determine do not contribute meaningfully to the analysis of the proposed nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Jenkins Lane 2. Name of applicant: Echelbarger Investments. LLC 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Todd EchelbyMer (425) 673-1100 4001 198th St. SW #2 Lynnwood, WA 98036 4. Date checklist prepared: 5. Agency requesting checklist: Revised on 9116116 2017-08-21 JL SEPA Checklist.doc ATTACH Packet Pg. 264 2.2.a 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable):_ Est. Construction to begin &Lil, 2018 Est. Construction to end Se tember 2018 (STAI-F COMMENTS) 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. Nn (STAFF COMMENTS) 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related i to this proposal. The proiect will ,provide a temporary erosion & sediment control plan, and technical information report addressing C' stormwater management., including flow control and treatment. • (STAFFCOMMENTS) - r-e % G4Ir- ��-.4- 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting 1 the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. None known a (STAFF COMMENTS) Revised on 9119116 2017-08-21 JL SEPA Checklist.doc Packet Pg. 265 2.2.a 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. RiTQht-of-Wirespermit. grading permit, utiloh hermits (sewer & water) (STAFF COMMENTS) �n►-r,.�� nt�� ; e-\1 'tom, r�rr�N e r �— F:1 LIDT 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. The pra ecl pro poses a 5-lot single fa►>:ily residential subdivision and associated tttilitles. Alost_of the site will _be cleared o ve etation other than some select trees which will be protected and saved. The site will then be railed to provide suitable birildin adsfat: the fulure ha►nes and utilities will be installed The Lronlage will be improved by widening the pavement and instalitag a curb on the south side o_f 13th WaL. (STAFF COMMENTS.) 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. Address: 720 13th Way SW Tax Parcel: 27032500314100 (STAFF CO Revised on 9119116 2017-08-21 JL SEPA Checklist.doc Packet Pg. 266 2.2.a TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other: The site is relatfvyfla dropping appraximate- ?-3 feet fro►n the south pwperry line to the north "0 erty line. The site was previously cleared for asingle-Lam_ily_ home, and the land cover currently consists of lawn, residential landscaping, and a few large trees. (STAFF COMMENTS) b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? The site a ears to have a Lairly consistent slQj2e raqgjqg from I % to 1. S% (STAFF COMMENTS) C. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, and muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any agricultural land of long term commercial significance and whether the proposal results in removing any of these soils. The USDA Soil Suvey indicates that the site is underlain by Everett gravelly sand& loam (STAFF COMME NTS) d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. None known (STAFF COMMENTS) Revised on 9119116 2017-08-21 JL SEPA Checktist.doc Packet Pg. 267 2.2.a e. Describe the purpose, type, total area and approximate quantities and total affected area of any filling, excavation, and grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. A relatively small amount al'F;ry n will be perfvrtned on -site la prepare jets for bit "din but no dirt is ernected to be impartedlexuorted We are anticipating at?�roxinaately 150-cy of'dirt to be excavated and re placed on -site. (STAFF COMME Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Erosion is expected to be mitigated through te►npwM erosion and sediment conlrol BMAs. The site is relatively flat. so interceptor trenches, silt enc ft and a stabilized construction entrance _is expected to keep se intent -laden runoff from leaving the site. _ (STAFF COMMENTS) g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? AoroximatelK 50%_ (STAFF COMMENTS) h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Silt fence, sedimentation trap, interceptor swales, stabilized construction entrance (STAFF COM 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, and industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describf and give approximate quantities if known. Emissions would be limited to consiructiore_eqyWmeni exhaust during construction activity. No signifcarai emissions are expected, from the final developed site. (STAFF COMME Revised on 9119116 2017-08-21 JL SEPA Checklist.doc Packet Pg. 268 2.2.a b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may effect your proposal? If so, generally describe. None known (STAFF COMMENTS) _ c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to the, if any: Nnnp nrnnn.ced n � (STAFF COMMENTS) 3. WATER a. Surface: (1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, and wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. c None a (STAFF COMMENTS)_ a (2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If 1 yes, please describe and attach available plans. No (STAFF COMMENTS) (3) Estimate the amount of till and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. ' None -- - a (STAFF COMMENTS) - Revised on 9119116 2017-08-21 JL SEPA Checklist.doc Packet Pg. 269 2.2.a (4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No (STAFF COMMENTS).` [ (5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. NO L - i (STAFF COMMENTS) (6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. a No i i a a (STAFF COMMENTS) 1 b. Ground: a (1) Will ground water be withdrawn from a well for drinking water or other purposes? If so, give a general description of the well, proposed uses and approximate quantities withdrawn from the well L Will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. i No ' (STAFF COMMENTS) Revised on 9119116 2017-08-21 JL SEPA Checklist.doc Packet Pg. 270 2.2.a (2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, it any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number or animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. Surface rune'is expected to be l-outed to small siorm►vater infiltration s slstems._Roo runoyis_not considered to be pollution generating, so it will be directy discharged to ibywells within each individual yard. Driveway runoff will be collected, treated, Then routed to a central infiltration gallery. (STAFF COMM C. Water Runoff (including storm water): (1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Roo frunoffis not considered io be pollution -generating, so it will be dirictly discha►• eg d to drvwells within each individual yard Driveway runoff will be collected, treated then routed to a central infiltration (STAFF COMMENTS) (2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. None is expected (STAFF COMMENTS) (3) Does the proposal alter or otherwise affect drainage patterns in the vicinity of the site? If so, describe. The proposed design is intended to match the historic runs patterns as closely as reasonablX possible, as required by local stormwater regulations. Revised on 9119116 2017-08-21 JG SEPA Checklist.doc Packet Pg. 271 2.2.a (STAFF COMMENTS) d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, runoff water, and drainage pattern impacts, if any: The proposed design is intended to match the historic runoffpatterns as closely as possible. No additional efforts are expected to be needed _ 4. Plants Fw Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: X deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other: X evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other: X shrubs X grass pasture crop or grain Orchards, vineyards or other permanent crops wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other: water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other: other types of vegetation: (STAFF COMM b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? The ro'ect site ro oses the removal o a stand o 'trees within the Cit 's ri ht-a -ry as well as a few bees interior to the site. The TESL plan for the project identifies several significant trees that are intended to be (STAFF COMMENTS) : f' c:i' } r' -c7 tawvo J,-�. Sw Ao Cif S��z�cJ 6. Revised on 9119116 2017-08-21 A SEPA Checklist.doc Packet Pg. 272 2.2.a C. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known c (STAFF COM M 1�-' N I'S) c s c d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other materials to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, s if any: u Typical residential landscaping (lawns and ornamental planis) are expected to occupy the finished site. � c (STAFF COMMENTS) e. List all noxious weeds and invasive species known to be on or near the site. None known (STAFF COMMENTS) 5. Animals s s a. List any birds and other animals that have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near U the site. Examples include: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: Son birds s c mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: None known e fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: None known _ Revised on 9119116 2017-08-21 JG SEPA Checklist.doc Packet Pg. 273 2.2.a (STAFF COMMENTS) b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known (STAFF COMMENTS) C. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. No (STAFF COMMENTS) Gd Qlja�__;St. 10� .�',��,; mle- P�,c�';.S.. !§& d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None are expected to be needed. (STAFF COMMENTS) e. List any invasive animal species known to be on or near the site. None known (STAFF COMMENTS) _ Revised on 9119116 2017-08-21 JL SEPA Checklist.doc Packet Pg. 274 2.2.a 7 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electric. na_tllrol gas (STAFF COMMENTS) _ _ z s b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. i NO S (STAFF COMMENTS)- c E C. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: 1Vnne s I c _ s c 0 4 4 (STAFF COMMENTS) 5LA-i,rp �n ur-- _2_ (�Ad trees s—e e.)r C-eZrh..-?c eAn. t, s s u Environmental Health s c a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and s explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could,occur as a result of this proposal? If so describe. i Risks associated with residential house ire. The project will have typical fire protection services available. < Revised on 9119116 2017-08-21 JL SEPA Checklist. doc Packet Pg. 275 2.2.a (STAFF COMMENTS)__ _ (1) Describe any known or possible contamination at the site from present or past uses. None known (STAFF COMMENTS) (2) Describe existing hazardous chemicals/conditions that might affect project development and design. This includes underground hazardous liquid and gas transmission pipelines located within the ' project area and in the vicinity. None known i i (STAFF COMMENTS) (3) Describe any toxic or hazardous chemicals that might be stored, used, or produced during the project's development or constructions, or at any time during the operating life of the project. a None known ` (STAFF COMMENTS) (4) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Only typical residential enter.geng, services (at�licel irelmedreul are er ecled io be needed. (STA FF CO M M ENTS) Revised on 9119116 2017-08-21 JL SEPA Checklist.doc Packet Pg. 276 2.2.a (5) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: None are expected to be needed. (STAFF COMMENTS)— b. Noise (1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Construction equ62menl noise on a short-term basis. e (STAFF COMMENTS) (2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hour's noise would come from the site. Construction equipment noise on a short-term basis. Construction activity %vould he 11mited to those hours allowed by Edmonds municipal code. (STAFF COMMENTS) (3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Construction activit X would be limited to those hours allowed by Edmonds munici a code. (STAFF COMMENTS) Revised on 9119116 2017-08-21 JL SEPA Checklist.doc Packet Pg. 277 2.2.a 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Will the proposal affect current land uses on nearby or adjacent properties? If so, describe. The project will remove an existing sin le famity residence and construct five single famdy residences. (STAFF COMMENTS) r' 5 c b. Has the project site been used as working farmlands or working forest lands? If so, describe. How much agricultural or forest land of long-term commercial significance will be converted to other uses as a result of the proposal, if any? If resource lands have not been designated, how many acres in farmland or forest land tax status will be converted to nonfarm or nonforest use? No (STAFFCOMMENTS) (1) Will the proposal affect or be affected by surrounding working farm or forest land normal business operations, such as oversize equipment access, the application of pesticides, tilling, and harvesting? Il so, how: (STAFF COMMENTS) C. Describe any structures on the site. One single,-LamilX home and a coo le o small detached shedc Otto v the site. (STAFF COMMENTS)��_ Revised on 9119116 2017-08-21 A SEPA Checklist.doc Packet Pg. 278 2.2.a d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? All existing -structures will be demolished. (STAFF COMMENTS) _ C. What is the current zoning classification of the site? RS-6 (STAFF COMMENTS) E What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? N/A (STAFF COMM ENTS) c E g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master plan designation of the site? N/A (STAFF COMMENTS) __JiC'r a. a: CA:or, _ u e a h. Has any part of the site been classified critical area by the city? If so, specify. No (STAFF COMMENTS) Revised on 9119116 2017-08-21 JL SEPA Checklist.doc Packet Pg. 279 2.2.a i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Alli2roximate.1y 10-20 (STAFF COMMENTS) i a i J. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? ' i None (STAFF COMMENTS) i k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None needed. (STAFF COMMENTS) _ I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, ii any: No change to the land use is proposed. (STAFF COMMENTS) r'xLi[__ In. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts to agricultural and forest lands of long-term commercial significance, if any: None (STAFF COMM Revised on 9119116 2017-08-21 JL SEPA Checklist. doc Packet Pg. 280 2.2.a 9. Housing :i. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Five middle income (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Approximately how many units, if any would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-incom( housing. c None i (STAFF COMMENTS) C. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None (STAFF COMMENTS) 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principle exterior building material(s) proposed? A11 future buildings wlll comgly with the maximum building heights specified in Edmonds municipal code. (STAFF COMMENTS) a Revised on 9119116 2017-08-21 A SEPA Checklist.doc Packet Pg. 281 2.2.a b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None are anticipated. (STAFF COMMENTS) C. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: None 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Vehicle headlights as residents enter/leave the proposed site. (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? Not antic! ated. (STAFF COMMENTS)- C. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Vehicle headlights as neighbors enter/leave the area. (STAFF COMMENTS) Revised on 9119116 2017-08-21 JL SEPA Checklist.doc Packet Pg. 282 2.2.a d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: None (STAFF COMMENTS) 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? None in the immediate vicinity. (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreation uses? If so, describe. No (STAFF COMMENTS) s C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: u None c (STr.A'F44F COMM ENTS) AIR — Revised 2.2.a 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any buildings, structures, or sites located on or near the site that are over 45 years old listed in, or eligible for listing in national, state, or local preservation registers? If so, specifically describe. 1Vn — a i (STAFF COMMENTS) n -..` v:� :�;a.,� 4,g- �a. 4 •1�- F,� ic,``r,� +� to-/ Ivr-,-,� X rem:e'--' ro- ` �T b. Are there any landmarks, features, or other evidence of Indian or historic use or occupation? This may include human burials or old cemeteries. Are there any material evidence, artifacts, or areas of cultural importance on or near the site? Please list any professional studies conducted at the site to identify such resources. No -- i (STAFF COMMENTS) _ i C. Describe the methods used to assess the potential impacts to cultural and historic resources on or near the project site. Examples include consultation with tribes and the Department of Archeology and Historic Preservation, archaeological surveys, historic maps, GIS date, etc. Historic maps and public Gl.S info (STAFF COMMENTS) AR� . d. Proposed measures to avoid, minimize, or compensate for loss, changes to, and disturbance to resources. , Please include plans for the above and any permits that may be required. None (STAFF COMMENTS) 3�--Q �`� n;•�'y 4,e- peer-�e�c�e�, Revised on 9119116 2017-08-21 JL SEPA Checklist.doc Packet Pg. 284 2.2.a 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site or affected geographic area, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The project is t tedby 13th Way SW which will be the primary access to the site. (STAFF COMMENTS) i b. Is the site or affected geographic area currently served by public transit? If so, generally describe. If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? The nearest ublie 1►ansit s= is at the intersection a Comanrls Wa I and Paradise Lane a ►•oxintatel %-nrrle from the site. (STAFF COMMENTS)- 4 a C. How many additional parking spaces would the completed project or nonproject proposal have? How ` many would the project or proposal eliminate? a 10 spaces, assuming 2 spaces for each proposed driveway. . 1 (STAFF COMMENTS) d. Will the proposal require any new or improvements to existing roads, streets, pedestrian, bicycle or state transportation facilities not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). Yes. the fronting street will be widened, and a curb will be added Revised on 9119116 2017-08-21 JL SEPA Checktist.doc Packet Pg. 285 2.2.a (STAFF COMMENTS)- 0 c e. Will the project or proposal use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? It c so, generally describe. c No c 0 s c (STAFF COMMENTS) l;er�� o.n� V—"k Scx,l.dkr) s c u f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when Is peak volumes would occur and what percentage of the volume would be trucks (such as commercial and passenger vehicles). What data or transportation models were used to make these estimates? s A traffic model was not warranted Lor a project o�this size. e S S s (STAFF COMMENTS) s s t g. Will the proposal interfere with, affect or be affected by the movement of agricultural and forest products s on roads or streets in the area? If so, generally describe. p 4 No i u h. (STAFF COMMENTS) Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: None e a s Revised on 9119116 2017-08-21 JL SEPA Checklist.doc Packet Pg. 28ti 2.2.a (STAFF COM M ENTS) c�o 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, public transit, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Fire, police, medical public transit, schools (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any: A oue (STAFF COMMENTS) 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other: Power, gas, water, sanitary sewer,.phone , (STAFF COM M ENTS) Revised on 9119116 2017-08-21 A SEPA Checklisl.doc Packet Pg. 287 2.2.a b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Power, gas_water, sanitary sewer, phone (STAFF COMMENTS) C. SIGNATURE I declare under penalty of perjury laws that the above answers are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. 8/18/17 Signature of Proponent Rev, eyed �Y ; s Date Submitted Revised on 9119116 2017-08-21 JL SEPA Checklist.doc Packet Pg. 288 2.2.a CITY OF EDMONDS 121 5ch Avenue North, Edmonds WA 98020 Phone: 425.771.0220 • Fax: 425.771.0221 • Web: www.edmondswa DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT • PLANNING DIVISION '`1e. 18yV September 15, 2017 Mr. Ken McIntyre SDA Engineering Via email: Kmcintyre(c-r�,sdaengineers.com SUBJECT: NOTICE OF COMPLETENESS AND ASSIGNMENT OF HEARING DATE FOR SUBDIVISION APPLICATION LOCATED AT 720 13TH WAY SW FILE NO. PLN20170028 Dear Mr. McIntyre: Thank you for submitting additional information regarding your land use application for a five -lot plat located at 720 13t' Way SW (File No. PLN20170028) on August 22, 2017 and September 8, 2017. Pursuant to Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) Section 20.02.002, the application became procedurally complete on September 5, 2017. Please accept this letter as the City's completeness notice in accordance with ECDC 20.02.003. Although the application is complete, the City may request additional information during review of the project with which to make a decision. A public hearing for your proposal has been scheduled for the following date and time: Action: Public Hearing Date of Meeting: Thursday, October 12, 2017 Time o Meetin : 3:00 PM or as soon thereafter aspossible) Place: Public Safety Complex, Council Chambers 250 — 5' Avenue North, Edmonds, WA 98020 Hearing Body: Hearing Examiner Please be aware that your presence at the hearing is highly advisable. If an applicant or their representative is not present, the item may be moved to the end of the agenda. Items not reached by the end of the meeting will be continued to the following meeting's agenda. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me via phone at (425) 771-0220 or via email at Jen.Machuga(k edmondswa. gov. Sincerely, Development Services Department - Planning Division Jen Machuga Associate Planner Cc: File No. PLN20170028 Page 1 of 1 ATTACH Packet Pg. 289 2.2.a 7 LO .� � o o ?S� �257 � 1 j26i 694 � 5�., iO N N N N 69 Project Location .r04 WAY S W W 681 t08 722 728 o � 710 72J 126 � 3 6Rs-s ��, )4 749 � ¢ WAY Sw � 740 � ti � - w g � ch LO 14 RM-2.4 736Oer BP M N 14 °V E��� Zoning and Vicinity Map Jenkins Lane Plat 720 13th Way SW PLN20170028 Scale 1 inch = 100 feet ATTACHF Packet Pg. 290 �e Critical Areas File #: Initial Determination - $100 ❑ Subsequent Determination - $50 Date Received: Date Mailed to Applicant: 7 The purpose of this checklist is to enable City staff to determine whether any critical areas and/or buffers are located on or adjacent to the subject property. Critical areas, such as wetlands, streams and steep slopes, are ecologically sensitive or hazardous areas that are regulated to protect their functions and values. The City's critical area regulations are contained within Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) Chapters 23.40 through 23.90. Property Owner's Authorization City of Edmonds Development Services Department Planning Division Phone: 425.771.0220 www.edmondswa.gov A property owner, or an authorized representative, must fill out the checklist, sign and date it, and submit it to the City. Staff will review the checklist, conduct a site visit, and make a determination of whether there are critical areas and/or critical area buffers on or near the site. If a "Critical Area Present" determination is issued, a report addressing the applicable critical area requirements of ECDC Chapters 23.40 through 23.90 may be required depending on the scope of the proposed activity. By my signature, I certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and grant my permission for the public officials and the staff of the City of Edmonds to enter the subject property for the purposes of inspection attendant to this application. The undersigned owner, and his/her/its heirs, and assigns, in consideration on the processing of the application agrees to release, indemnify, defend and hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any and all damages, including reasonable attorney's fees, arising from any action or infraction based in whole or part upon false, misleading, inaccurate or incomplete information furnished by the applicant, his/her/its agents or employees. SIGNATURE OF OWNER &� ll- DATE 61,10 /vqo 17 *,0- qA), alfe_5-/ _ Owner: Annette Kessler, PR of Leo William LeFevre Estate Name 22720 Brier Road Street Address Brier WA 98036 City State Zip Applicant/Agent: Echelbar er Investments LLC Name 4001 198th St. SW. #2 Street Address Lynnwood WA 98036 City State Zip Telephone: 425.670.3314 Telephone: 425.673.1100 Email address: Beach4me@Frontier.com Email Address: Todd@Echelbarger.com Remised on 114117 P20 - Critical Arens Checklist ATTACH Packet Pg. 291 2.2.a #P20 CA File No: GRp�'�,G�� C�[�.( _ Critical Areas Checklist Site Information 1. Site Address/Location: 720 13th Way SW, Edmonds WA 98020 2. 3 4 Property Tax Account Number: 27032500314100 Approximate Site Size (acres or square feet): Is this site currently developed? IN Yes ❑ Nc 36,497 SF If yes, how is the site developed? Tliere ]s an existing sin ]ems family Home on the property. 5. Describe the general site topography. Check all that apply. N Flat to Rolling: No slope on/adjacent to the site or slopes generally less than 15% (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of 66-feet). N 7 :. ❑ Moderate: Slopes present on/ to site of more than 15% and less than 40% (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of 25 to 66-feet). ❑ Steep: Slopes of greater than 40% present on/adjacent to site (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of less than 25-feet). Have there been landslides on or near the site in the past? ❑ Yes IN No If yes, please describe: Site contains areas of year-round standing water? ❑ Yes (approx. depth: ) Site contains areas of seasonal standing water? ❑ Yes (approx. depth: ) If yes, what season(s) of the year? 0 019 9. Site is in the floodway or floodplain of a water course? ❑ Floodway ❑ Floodplain 10. Site contains a creek or an area where water flows across the grounds surface? ❑ Yes ® No If yes, are flows year-round (,rr seasonal? ❑ Year-round ❑ Seasonal (time of year: ) 11. Obvious wetland is present on site? ❑ Yes ® No -------- ---------------- ---- ---- - For City Staff Use Only —--------- —---- ____�_ 1. Zoning: _ Q 7_G r 3. SCS mapped soil type(s): S Q O/ 3. Critical Areas inventory or C.A.• map indicates Critical Area on site: 1(J( nL- S)naulrn neo ►rnnp 4. Site within designated North Edmonds Earth Subsidence and Landslide Hazard Area (ESHLA)? _ /(%(') DETERMINATION CRITICAL AREAS PRESENT / " WAIVER Reviewed by: l . _ Date: ZO Remised on 114117 P20 - Critical Areas Checklist Packet Pg. 292 2.2.a Critical Area Map CRA20170091 720 13th Way SW. "C. 115" Scale 1 inch = 60 feet Packet Pg. 293 2.2.a ti V �j CITY OF EDMONDS 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH, EDMONDS, WA 98020 (425) 771-0220 WAC 197-11-970 Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Description of proposal: The proposal is to subdivide a single lot into five lots for residential development. The site is zoned RS-6 (Single -Family Residential, minimum lot size of 6,000 square feet). File Number PLN20170028. Proponent: Echelbarger Investments, LLC Location of proposal, including street address if any: 720 13th Way SW, Edmonds, WA Tax Parcel Number 27032500314100 Lead agency: City of Edmonds The lead agency has determined that the requirements for environmental analysis and protection have been adequately addressed in the development regulations and comprehensive plan adopted under chapter 36.70A RCW, and in other applicable local, state, or federal laws or rules, as provided by RCW 43.21C.240 and WAC 197-11-158 and/or mitigating measures have been applied that ensure no significant adverse impacts will be created. An environmental impact statement is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. XX There is no comment period for this DNS. This DNS is issued under 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date below Comments must be submitted by N/A. Project Planner: Jen Machuga, Associate Planner Responsible Official: Rob Chave, Planning Manager Contact Information: City of Edmonds 1 121 5th Avenue North, Edmonds WA 98020 1 425-771-0220 Date: l q Signature: XX You may appeal this determination to Robert Chave, Planning Manager, at 121 5th Avenue North, Edmonds, WA 98020, by filing a written appeal citing the specific reasons for the appeal with the required appeal fee, adjacent property owners list and notarized affidavit form no later than October 3, 2017. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact Rob Chave to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. XX Posted on September 19, 2017, at the Edmonds Public Library and Edmonds Public Safety Building. Published in the Everett Herald. Emailed to the Department of Ecology SEPA Center (SEPAunit@_ecy,wa.gov). Mailed notice to property owners within 300 feet of the site. XX Distributed to "Checked" Agencies on the following page The SEPA Checklist, project plans, location map, and DNS are available at https://permits.edmonds.wa.us/citizen. Search for file number PLN20170028. These materials are also available for viewing at the Planning Division — located on the second floor of City Hall: 121 5th Avenue North, Edmonds WA 98020. Page 1 of 2 PLN20170028 SEPA DNS 9/19/17 SEPA ATTACH Packet Pg. 294 2.2.a Notice mailed/emailed to the following XX COMCAST XX Community Transit Outside Plant Engineer, North Region Attn.: Kate Tourtellot 1525 751h St. SW Ste 200 7100 Hardeson Road Everett, WA 98203 Everett, WA 98203 XX Tulalip Tribal Council XX Olympic View Water & Sewer District 6700 Totem Beach Road 8128 228'h St. SW Marysville, WA 98270 Edmonds, WA 98026 XX Snohomish County Fire District No. 1 XX Department of Archaeology & Historic Headquarters Station No. 1 Preservation Attn.: Director of Fire Services PO Box 48343 12310 Meridian Avenue South Olympia, WA 98504-8343 Everett, WA 98208-5764 XX Puget Sound Energy XX Town of Woodway Attn: David Matulich Attn.: Clerk -Treasurer PO Box 97034, M/S BOT-1 G 23920 113th Place West Bellevue, WA 98009-9734 Woodway, WA 98020 dayid.ma_t_u_lichCa7pse.corri XX Swedish Hospital XX Annette Kessler, PR of Leo William 21601 76th Avenue West LeFevre Estate Edmonds, WA 98026 22720 Brier Rd. Brier, WA 98036 XX Edmonds School District No. 15 XX Ken McIntyre, SDA Engineering 20420 68th Avenue West 1724 Marine View Dr., Suite #140 Lynnwood, WA 98036-7400 Everett, WA 98201 XX Echelbarger Investments, LLC 4001 198 th St. SW, #2 Lynnwood, WA 98036 Attachments pc: File No. PLN20170028 SEPA Notebook Page 2 of 2 PLN20170028 SEPA DNS 9/19/17,SEPA Packet Pg. 295 2.2.a CITY OF EDMONDS DEPARTMENT OF FIRE PREVENTION MEMORANDUM July 18, 2017 To: Jen Machuga, Associate Planner From: Kevin Zweber, Fire Marshal Re: Plan Check: PLN20170128 Address: 720 13t" Way, Edmonds Project: 5 Lot Plat After review of the preliminary plans for the above project, it was found that the following will be required: 1. In lieu of a 20' paved access road, residential fire sprinklers will be required in all structures reguardless of size. Fire lane markings are required. See attached fire lane standard. 2. A new fire hydrant is required. Locate at the corner of 13t" Way and the new access road. IFC 507 and ECDC. 3. Emergency access gate switch/sensor is required if an automatic gate crosses a private fire access road — IFC 506 and COE/FD1 Emergency Access Standard. Kevin Zweber Deputy Chief — Fire Marshal City of Edmonds, Department of Fire Prevention ATTACH Packet Pg. 296 0e ED tj w : FIRE DIf = TYRI T Updated: April 2017 NOTE: Detailed plans must be submitted, and approved, prior to painting any new fire lane or modifying any existing fire lane. Fire Lanes must: 1) Be a minimum unobstructed width of 20 feet and minimum unobstructed vertical clearance of 13 feet, 6 inches. *Fire lanes shall be a minimum of 26 feet wide in the immediate vicinity of any building over 30 feet in height above grade. Such fire lanes shall be located a minimum of 15 feet and a maximum of 25 feet from the building. 2) Provide Fire Department access to within 150 feet of any portion of an un-sprinkled building. In buildings that provided with an automatic sprinkler, access may be increased, at the discretion of the Fire Marshal. 3) Provide Fire Department access to all on -site fire hydrants and fire department connections (FDC) for sprinkler and standpipe. A hydrant must be located to within 25' of a fire department connection (or as approved by the Fire Marshal) and must not block fire access roads when connected. 4) Have adequate turning radius to allow maneuvering of fire apparatus: inside radius 25 feet; outside radius 45 feet. 5) Be circulating or have an approved turn -around if over 150 feet long. Have grades of no more than 14%. 6) Be paved with asphalt or approved equivalent and be capable of supporting the imposed loads of fire apparatus. 7) Be marked with words "FIRE LANE — NO PARKING." Words to be painted on the pavement inside the lane. Letters to be a minimum of 12" high, 2" stroke, yellow in color, and alternately spaced every 50 feet. 8) Have perimeter striping/curbing to delineate the boundaries of the Fire Lane. Striping to be a minimum of 4 inches wide and striping/curbing to be yellow in color. 9) When required by the Fire Marshal, signs shall be used in addition to or in lieu of striping. Signs, when approved, shall meet the following requirements: a) Size: 18" high x 12" wide (min.) b) Mounting: Bottom of sign 48" to 60" above grade. c) Style: Industry standard (Vulcan %7-6-9, Rainbow 01-527, EMED TC 18816 or approved equivalent). d) Color: Red lettering on white background e) Spacing: 50' between signs or as required by Fire Marshal. 10)Fire lanes shall be established by these requirements to provide access to buildings during construction, alteration or demolition. Fire Code Supplemental Rules and Regulations are designated interpretations of the adopted International Fire Code, Edmonds Community Development Code and national standards allowed by IFC 102 7,102 S and 102.9 and ECDC 19.25 which provide specifics and details to aid in conformance with the intent of the governing laws, statutes, ordinances and fire- and life safety -related requirements Page 1 of 1 Packet Pg. 297 2.2.a CITY OF EDMONDS — PLANNING DIVISION STAFF COMMENT FORM 8 PW-Engineering 8 Fire ❑ PW - Mainlenan B building Project Number: Applicant's Name PLN20170028 JENKINS LANE Property Location: 720 13TH WAY Date Application Received: 6.23.17 Date Application Routed: 6.28.17 Zoning: RS-6 Project Description: 5-LOT PLAT If you have any questions or need clarification on this project, please contact: Responsible Staff JEN MACHUGA Ext. 1224 ------------------------------ Name of Individual Submitting Comments: Title: QU WON 1 have reviewed this land use proposal for �y department and i do not have any comments. My department may also review this project during the building permit process (if applicable) and reserves the right to provide additional comments at that time. Date: ❑ 1 have reviewed this land use proposal for my department and have the following comments or conditions: ATTACH Packet Pg. 298 2.2.a MEMORANDUM Engineering Memo of Compliance Date: October 5, 2017 To: Jen Machuga, Associate Planner From: Jeanie McConnell, Engineering Program Manager Subject: PLN20170028, Jenkins Lane 5 lot plat 7201311 Way SW Engineering has reviewed the preliminary plat application for the Jenkins Lane plat at 720 — 13th Way SW. The information provided indicates general engineering feasibility; project -specific design, including final utility system design and location, as well as Title 18 Edmonds Community Development Code compliance, will be reviewed during the civil construction plan review phase of this project. Preliminary approval shall not be interpreted to mean approval of the improvements as shown on the preliminary plans. Please find attached the Engineering Requirements for the subject development. The applicant will be required to satisfy these requirements as a condition of plat approval. The attached Engineering Requirements include a requirement to improve 13th Way SW along the frontage of the proposed development to current City standards. The existing pavement section does not currently meet City standards (it is too narrow) and therefore road widening is required. The applicant provided preliminary development plans to the City indicating that with road widening, the removal of a row of trees located within the City right-of-way along the frontage of the subject property would be necessary. The preliminary development plans are intended to represent all required improvements, however, the specific design and layout of the civil improvements will be reviewed in further detail during the civil construction plan review phase of the project. The City works with developers to preserve as many trees as possible, and will do so at this location as well. It appears likely, however, that the required street widening improvements will impact the trees in question and will result in the removal of the row of trees located within the City right-of-way along the frontage of the subject property. Once the Hearing Examiner has approved the preliminary plat, the applicant will be required to submit revised civil engineering plans addressing all plat conditions. Plans are to be submitted to the Engineering Division. A civil plan review fee is to be paid at the time of submittal. At this time, the review fee is $4265. City of Edmonds ATTACH Packet Pg. 299 2.2.a CITY OF EDMONDS 121 - 5TH AVENUE NORTH, EDMONDS, WA 98020 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT - ENGINEERING DIVISION REQUIREMENTS FOR PLATS To: Planning Division File Number: PLN20170028 From: Jeanie McConnell, Engineering Program Manager Engineering Division Date: October 5, 2017 Project: Jenkins Lane Address: 720 13th Way SW Required as a Required as a Requirement Condition of Condition of Already Subdivision Building Permit Satisfied 1. Right -of Way Dedication for Public Streets: a) N/A 2. Public Street Improvements & Access (Asphalt, curb, gutter and sidewalks): a) Curb and gutter shall be provided along 13th Way SW property frontage X to comply with City standards and requirements. X b) 13th Way SW to be widened along property frontage to comply with street standards for the specific roadway classification. X X c) Cross slope of public road shall not exceed 2% d) Existing driveway approach to be removed and replaced. e) All lots shall take access off 13th Way SW. Lot 1 shall have an individual access off 13th Way SW. X L Driveway curb cuts shall be constructed to meet City standards and ADA requirements. ii. Individual driveway access points shall meet sight distance requirements set forth by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). 3. Private Access Requirements & Improvements: a) Lots 2-5 shall take access off private access road. X i. Private access road shall be paved to 16.0-feet in width, plus 18" asphalt thickened edge or concrete curb as needed to direct storm flows. ii. Slope of private access road shall not exceed 14%. iii. Cross slope of private access road shall not exceed 2% b) Lot 1 shall take access off 13th Way SW. X c) Provide asphalt or concrete driveway approaches on each lot per City Code. X d) Slope of individual driveways shall not exceed 14% and shall be noted as such on the civils. X 4. Street Turnaround: a) Provide on -site turnaround for Lots 3 & 4 to City Standards. X Engineering Requirements-PLN20170028-Jenkins Lane 1 of 3 Packet Pg. 300 2.2.a Required as a Required as a Requirement Condition of Condition of Already Subdivision Building Permit Satisfied 5. Easements (City utilities, private access, other utilities): a) Provide all easements as required - access, utility, etc. X X b) Private access easement shall be 20 (twenty) feet in width 6. Street Lights: a) Install street lighting, as required, at entrance to access road. Lighting requirements and spacing shall be determined by a licensed Professional X Engineer experienced in street lighting. b) Light poles shall be PUD's standard 30' fiberglass X . 7Street Trees/Planting Stri a) N/A 8. Water System Improvements OVWSD : a) Applicant must meet requirements set forth by Olympic View Water and Sewer District for connection to public water system. X b) Install fire hydrant, including 4" storz adapter, as required by Fire Department. Hydrant spacing as per ECDC 19.25. X c) Provide water service stub to each Lot X d) Connect to public water system. X X 9. Sanitary Sewer System Im rovements: a) Provide new service lateral from City's sanitary sewer main to X development. X i. Provide new 4" side sewer to individual lots. ii. Where sewer lateral provides service to more than one lot, it shall be a minimum of 6". iii. Where sewer lateral provides service to more than 9 lots, it shall be 8". b) Connect to public sewer system. X X 10. Stormwater System Improvements: a) Provide a Stormwater Management Report and Site Plan that shows compliance with ECDC 18.30, Stormwater Addendum and 2014 X Department of Ecology Stormwater Manual. i. Stormwater management design shall account for proposed plat improvements and future lot development. ii. Stormwater management system(s) to be located on private property. b) Construct privately owned and maintained stormwater management X system(s).. X i. Construction of Low Impact Development BMP's for individual lots may be deferred to the single family building permit with condition of construction deferral noted as such on the face of the plat map. c) Connect all new impervious surfaces to storm system as required. X X d) Connect to public storm system or manage stormwater on site where X feasible. X e) Storm catch basins shall be installed in gutter flow line in 13th Way SW, as required. X 0 N O O 0 N Z J IL c O A 7 O J m ii 0 c cv J N c Y C d N T N C CD E s t� r r Q s 3 O am CD Cn K W c d E s v Q Engineering Requirements-PLN20170028-Jenkins Lane 2 of 3 Packet Pg. 301 2.2.a Required as a Condition of Subdivision Required as a Condition of Building Permit Requirement Already Satisfied 11. Under round Wiring (per Ord. 1387 a) Required for all new services. X X 12. Excavation and Grading (per IBC a) Submit a grading plan as part of engineered site plan. X X b) Submit grading plan for foundations with building permit. X 13. Si na a and Striping (per City Engineer): a) All signs shall be vinyl letters and to City standards. X b) Provide "No Parking - Fire Lane" signage as required by Fire Dept. X c) Provide fire and aid address signage. X 14. Survey Monumentation(per Ord., Sect. 12.10.120 : a) N/A 15. As -built Drawings(per CitV Engineer): a) Provide an as -built drawing of all street and utility improvements both in electronic format as well as a hard copy. 16. Other Re uirements a) Plat showing lots, easements, legals, survey information X X X X X b) Legal documents for each lot c) Field stake lot corners (by professional surveyor) X d) Field stake utility stubs at property lines X X X X e) Clustered mailbox location per Postmaster f) Maintenance agreements g) Transporation Impact Fee Analysis 17. Engineering Fees: a) Storm system development charge (public road) X b) Storm system development charge (each new lot) X c) Sewer general facility charge X d) Water general facility charge - OVWSD e) Water meter fee - OVWSD f) Transportation impact fee per each new SFR X g) Parks impact fees X h) Plat/PRD civil plan review fee X i) Right -of -Way Construction Permit X j) Inspection fees X 0 N 0 0 P_ 0 N Z J IL C O N rn O J d ii d C cv J N c Y C d N c CD E s w w Q s •3 O am CD to Cn w s x W r-� C d E t V r� r� Q Engineering Requirements-PLN20170028-Jenkins Lane 3 of 3 Packet Pg. 302 2.2.a `/) C. i a')., Notice of Application, Public Hearing and SEPA Determination - File Number PLN20170028 NOTICE OF APPLICATION Description of Proposal: The applicant is proposing to subdivide the subject site into five lots for residential development. The site is zoned RS-6 (Single -Family Residential, minimum lot size of 6,000 square feet). A preliminary formal plat application is a Type III-B decision made by the Hearing Examiner following a public hearing. Name of Applicant: Echelbarger Investments, LLC Location: 720 131 Way SW, Edmonds, WA File No.: PLN20170028 Date of Application: June 23, 2017 Date of Notice: September 19, 2017 Requested Permits: Formal Subdivision Required Studies: None. Tax Parcel Number: 27032500314100 Date of Completeness: September 5, 2017 Other Required Permits: SEPA Review Existing Environmental Documents: Critical Areas Checklist and SEPA Environmental Checklist. Comments on Proposal Due: October 12, 2017 (see public hearing information below). Any person has the right to comment on this application during the public comment period, receive notice and participate in any hearings, and request a copy of the decision on the application. The City may accept public comments at any time prior to the closing of the record of an open record predecision hearing, if any, or, if no open record predecision hearing is provided, prior to the decision on the project permit. Only parties of record as defined in ECDC 20.07.003 have standing to initiate an administrative appeal. Information on this development application can be viewed or obtained at the City of Edmonds Development Services Department, 121 - 5th Ave. N, Edmonds, WA 98020. Office hours are Mondays, Tuesdays, Thursdays and Fridays from 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., and Wednesdays from 8:00 a.m. to noon or online through the City's website at https://permits.edmonds.wa.us/citizen. Search for permit PLN20170028. City Contact: Jeri Machuga, Associate Planner, (425) 771-0220, jen.machugagedmondswa.gov PUBLIC HEARING INFORMATION A public hearing before the Hearing Examiner will be held on Thursday, October 12, 2017 at 3:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers located at 250 - 5th Ave. N, Edmonds, WA 98020. *SEPA NOTICE ON REVERSE SIDE* ATTACH Packet Pg. 303 2.2.a *NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PUBLIC HEARING ON REVERSE SIDE* STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT (SEPA) NOTICE DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Lead Agency: The City of Edmonds is SEPA lead agency for the proposed five -lot subdivision (File No. PLN20170028). SEPA Determination: Notice is hereby given that the City of Edmonds has issued a Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) under WAC 197-11-340 for the above project. Date of Issuance: September 19, 2017 SEPA Appeal Deadline: October 3, 2017 at 4:00 p.m. Appeals must be filed in writing citing the specific reasons for appeal with the required fee to the City of Edmonds Planning Division, 121 — 5th Ave. N, Edmonds, WA 98020. PRELIMINARY PLAT MAP —� 3TH WAY S.W. +�S'ft-sou { I rz M_, I l x "AfhQmMsfil. ss• J ---� 7t' za°e is W u�vr LAv7 Sa- 7 � 1151 7m17706's2 .� lI i "dtrsl`aCr uar + I ,l,- S•, :, frF B-— — — — — — — — — — J----_. I°' met r°' -----�---------------- SRW7-fl�fnq�'----�-- — — — -- —\�,477 1 `0.1 rip OF P LAC N 5 PRE mm'i6' r VOW— r EWGEM �yw FM 5F } 6,Iv F 1 FE '* ti ,.---- ,-_� f • dF22W R rFJW rtxxQ rw. w m ?%V Q�z Packet Pg. 304 2.2.a FILE NO.: PLN20170028 APPLICANT: ECHELBARGER DECLARATION OF POSTING NOTICE OF APPLICATION, PUBLIC HEARING & SEPA DETERMINATION On the 19 day of September, 2017, the attached Notice of Application, Public Hearing & SEPA Determination was posted by the City to property owners within 300 feet of the property that is the subject of the above -referenced application. I, Jennifer Machuga, hereby declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that the foregoing is true and correct this 19 day of September, 2017 at Edmonds, Washington. Signed: (BFP747887 DOCJ\00006.900000\ ) Packet Pg. 305 2.2.a FILE NO.: PLN20170028 APPLICANT: ECHELBARGER DECLARATION OF MAILING NOTICE OF APPLICATION, PUBLIC HEARING & SEPA DETERMINATION On the 19 day of September, 2017, the attached Notice of Application, Public Hearing & SEPA Determination was mailed by the City to property owners within 300 feet of the property that is the subject of the above -referenced application. I, Denise Nelson, hereby declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that the foregoing is true and correct this 19 day of September, 2017 at Edmonds, Washington. Signed: ZG ,� {BFP747887.DOC;1\00006.900000\ } Packet Pg. 306 2.2.a ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS LIST Attach this notarized declaration to the adjacent property owners list. JUN 193 201? v���Lr3Fr�E�1� COS §kRWC&, On my oath, I certify that the names and addresses provided represent all properties located within 300 feet of the subject property. Signature of Applicant or Applicant's Representative Subscribed and sworn to before me this T day of O•,-% C- A li• AU,- NrAjUbk in and for the State of Washington Residing at (_a-ke- 5t,,ie,d15 LYNN K ROWE Notary Public State of Washington My Appointment Expires May 12, 2021 Revised on 9130111 P2 - Adjaceirt Property Owners List Packet Pg. 307 Easy Peel® Labels Use AveryO Template 51600 j '00390000001500 Kathryn McCleary 1415 7th PI S Edmonds WA 98020 '00390000001800 Alan Sharp 1416 7th PI S Edmonds WA 98020 '00390100000200 Susan Musgrove 760 14th Way SW Edmonds WA 98020 '00390100000500 Steven Thompson 731 14th Way SW Edmonds WA 98020 '00390100000800 James Cannon 761 14th Way SW Edmonds WA 98020 '00390100001100 Mark & Dodo Hinds 749 14th Way SW Edmonds WA 98020 '00390100001400 Timothy & Nora Luz Emerson Kriegel 736 14th Way SW Edmonds WA 98020 '00539100002000 Richard & Cassandra Larson 650 Birch St Edmonds WA 98020 '00539100003100 Andrew Summers 694 13th Way Edmonds WA 98020 '00539100003400 Joe Scordino 681 13th Way Edmonds WA 98020 A Bend along line to 11 Feed Paper expose Pop-up EdgeTM j '00390000001600 Kien-Wu & Noriko Miyagi Tseng 1411 7th PI S Edmonds WA 98020 '00390000001900 Jeffrey & Wendy Krumroy 1420 7th PI S Edmonds WA 98020 '00390100000300 Nicholas & Kathleen Dire 721 14th Way SW Edmonds WA 98020 '00390100000600 Robert Caldwell 739 14th Way S W Edmonds WA 98020 '00390100000900 Eric & Rebecca Freund 757 14th Way SW Edmonds WA 98020 IN AVER 2.2.a '00390000001700 Richard Jackson 769 14th Way SW Edmonds WA 98020 '00390100000100 Laura & Doquilo Jesse Zeck 713 14th Way SW Edmonds WA 98020 '00390100000400 Shippen Sallie E Revocable Trust 756 14th Way SW Edmonds WA 98020 '00390100000700 Nicholas & Cohen Monique Switzer 765 14th Way SW Edmonds WA 98020 '00390100001000 Michael & Brenda Oneal 753 14th Way SW Edmonds WA 98020 '00390100001200 '00390100001300 Christopher & Kramer Farah Cavanaugh David & Purser Erin Ito 744 14th Way SW 740 14th Way SW Edmonds WA 98020 Edmonds WA 98020 '00390100001500 Kathleen Lucille Tuura 732 14th Way SW Edmonds WA 98020 '00539100002900 G Frederick Brink 641 13th Way Edmonds WA 98020 '00539100003200 Brian & Harris Tamara Ford 697 13th Way Edmonds WA 98020 '00539100003500 Andrew & Brandi Alsdorf 670 13th Way Edmonds WA 98020 '00539100001900 Scott & Vostral Mara Baker 660 Birch St Edmonds WA 98020 '00539100003000 Erik Aaroe 690 13th Way Edmonds WA 98020 '00539100003300 Peter Evich 691 13th Way Edmonds WA 98020 '00539100003600 Nicole Welch 660 13th Way Edmonds WA 98020 ® ' A Repliez h la hachure afin de i WW Packet Pg. 308 ttiquettes Easy Peel Sens de MC Utilisez le gabarit AVERY@ 51600 1 charaement reveler le rehord Pop-up 1 1-800- - j Easy PeelO Labels i ♦ Bend along line to i "� Pap Edger"" AV I`�i 2 2 a Use Avery® Template 5160® j Feed Paper expose -up j '00539100003700 '00647000000100 '00647000000200 Kevin Judd Seng Chiong & Mieko Po William Westgard 650 13th Way 722 13th Way SW 724 13th Way Edmonds WA 98020 Edmonds WA 98020 Edmonds WA 98020 '00647000000300 '00647000000400 '00647000000500 William Pedersen Jacob & Lindsay Knuth John Ajax 726 13th Way 728 13th Way SW 730 13th Way N Edmonds WA 98020 Edmonds WA 98020 Edmonds WA 98020 O 0 '00647000000600 '00655600000100 '00655600000200 r O CN z Robert Freeborn Helen Holcomb Furbush Ferber Family Revocable Living Tru! a 1360 8th Ave S 706 Birch St 704 Birch St 0 Edmonds WA 98020 Edmonds WA 98020 Edmonds WA 98020 rn '00655600000300 '00657000000100 '00657000000200 Nicholas Rivano Virginia Gavurnik Jordan & Sara Redford o 700 Birch St 729 13th Way SW 727 13th Way m Edmonds WA 98020 Edmonds WA 98020 Edmonds WA 98020 > iL '00657000000300 '00657000000400 '00657000000500 Jason & Kelly Steyskal Shaunn McClellan Paul & Geralyn Custodio 1267 7th PI S 12617th PI S 1257 7th PI S Edmonds WA 98020 Edmonds WA 98020 Edmonds WA 98020 '00657000000600 '00657000000700 '00657000000800 Steve & McKenzie Unwin Robert & Mary Anderson Andrew Kempler 1253 7th PI S 1250 7th PI S 1254 7th PI S Edmonds WA 98020 Edmonds WA 98020 Edmonds WA 98020 '00657000000900 '00657000001000 '00657000001100 Charles & Rebecca Rossow Tand LLC Patricia Weaver 1260 7th PI S 723 13th Way 721 13th Way Edmonds WA 98020 Edmonds WA 98020 Edmonds WA 98020 '00657000001200 '00657000001300 '00657000001400 Erich & Cari Armbruster John Weed Thomas & Janice Corbett 719 13th Way 715 13th Way 707 13th Way Edmonds WA 98020 Edmonds WA 98020 Edmonds WA 98020 '27032500304200 '27032500304300 '27032500306500 Floydette Dexter Tracy & Jason Wells David Cummings 1258 8th Ave S 1244 8th Ave S 645 Edmonds Way Edmonds WA 98020 Edmonds WA 98020 Edmonds WA 98020 '27032500306600 '27032500306700 '27032500306800 John & Annette Dentel Thomas Wible Thomas & Janis Kane 643 Edmonds Way 647 Edmonds Way 641 Edmonds Way Edmonds WA 98020 Edmonds WA 98020 Edmonds WA 98020 ® I A Repliez a la hachure afin de i vvvv� Packet Pg. 309 Etiquettes Easy Peel Sens de M� Utilisez le aabarit AVERY@ 51600 1 charaement reveler le rebord Pop-up 1 1-800- - 1 Easy PeelO Labels Use AveryTemplate 51600 '27032500306900 Thomas Kane 641 Edmonds Way Edmonds WA 98020 '27032500314300 Karen Ann Noah 708 13th Way Edmonds WA 98020 Echelbarger Investments LLC 4001 198th Street SW #2 Lynnwood WA 98036 Ken McIntyre, SDA Engineering 1724 Marine View Dr., Suite #140 Everett, WA 98201 i ♦ fiend along line to AVER jFeed Paper expose Pop-up EdgeTM '27032500307900 '27032500314200 Chermak Howard & Judith Living Trust Arne & Sherri Gillam 655 Edmonds Way 710 13th Way Edmonds WA 98020 Edmonds WA 98020 '27032500314400 Clifford Alan Brunk 704 13th Way Edmonds WA 98020 Town of Woodway Attn.: Clerk -Treasurer 23920 113th Place West Woodway, WA 98020 27032500314100 Estate of Leo Le Fevre 720 13th Way SW Edmonds WA 98020 Annette Kessler PR of Leo William LeFevre Estate 22720 Brier Rd. Brier, WA 98036 ® ' A Repliez a la hachure afin de i Packet Pg. 310 ttiquettes Easy Peel Sens de Utilisez le cgabarit AVERY® 5160® j charcierne reveler le rebord Pop-up^^� i 1-800- 1 2.2.a Everett Daily Herald Affidavit of Publication State of Washington } County of Snohomish } ss Dicy Sheppard being first duly sworn, upon oath deposes and says: that he/she is the legal representative of the Everett Daily Herald a daily newspaper. The said newspaper is a legal newspaper by order of the superior court in the county in which it is published and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of the first publication of the Notice hereinafter referred to, published in the English language continually as a daily newspaper in Snohomish County, Washington and is and always has been printed in whole or part in the Everett Daily Herald and is of general circulation in said County, and is a legal newspaper, in accordance with the Chapter 99 of the Laws of 1921, as amended by Chapter 213, Laws of 1941, and approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of Snohomish County, State of Washington, by order dated June 16, 1941, and that the annexed is a true copy of EDH777606 PLN20170028 as it was published in the regular and entire issue of said paper and not as a supplement form thereof for a period of 1 issue(s), such publication commencing on 09/19/2017 and ending on 09/19/2017 and that said newspaper was regularly distributed to its subscribers during all of said period. The amount of the fee for such publication is $99.76. Subscribed and sworn be ore me on this 1� day of � y N ary Public in and for the State of Washington. City of Edmonds - LEGAL ADS 114101416 MEN MACHUGA Linda Phillips Notary Public State of Washington My APPomtmem ExPires 0"9/2021 Packet Pg. 311 2.2.a CITY OF EDMONDS Notice of Application, Public blearing and SEPA Determination - File Number PLN20170028 NOTICE OF APPLICATION Ijgacrtnilon o1.P�omsa4:Tha applicant Is pproposing to subdivide Iho gubublacI bite into live lots for residondal dBYBtdpmont, The site is zoned VS-6 (Single -Family Residential, minimum lot size of 6 000 square last). A preliminary formal plel application Is a Type 111-11 dect0on made by to Hearing Examiner follovingg a public hearlrlg. Hnma of Anngr ni- Frinvestments.helbhmar investments. ILL June 23, 7.017 4; Soptom5or 5, 2017 ember 19.2017 Formal SubdivWoe nua: SEPA Review Critical Areas Checklist and An ors0n has the r jht to comment on this applicaton during the ppu�l�c cornmant per ad. receive notice and participate In any hearin s, and request a eupy of thin decision on fire appiloatron, The CRY may accept public comments al any time prior to the cloying of the record of en open record predeclsian hearing. if any, or, If no open record pradecisfon hearing Is provided, prlorto the decision on the project pamill. Only parties at record as defined in ECDC 20,07.003 have standing to Initiate an adminkseallve appeal. Information on this development application can bo viewed or obtained at the City of Edmonds Development SorYJ00S Department, 121 - Slh Ave. N. Edmonds, WA 98020•Office hour& are Mondays, Tuesdays, Thursdays and Frldayo from 6:00 e.m, to 4:30 p.m., and Wednesdays from 0:00 a.m. to noon or oniino through the Cityswebslte at httosYleermiig,$d#.N�.16�i111]• Search for 1.r., pl.uzRtid0 C.1 Jan Machuga, Associate Plannor, (425) 771.0220, lea nta��.vddt Pt1eLl3LIC HEARING INFORMATION A public hearing before the Hearing Examiner will be hold on Thumdav- OCiohar 12. 2017 at.100 a.m" in the Council Chambers DETERMINATION OF NOWIGNIFICANCE pWr gQ 'g od �vay-i, The Cat diity of rivIefionEdmonds is SEPA lend agency for the SEPA Determination', Nolloo iFdW soheer62yp1gIvan 8that the City of Edmonds has issued a Determination of Nonalgnificanoe (ONS) under WAC 197.11 440 for dio above prvjecl. Datmel Issuance: September 19, 20$7 SM AppAal Oeadilna:Octebvr 3. j0JZALAAjjLM Appeals most be Iliad in writing ctiing the specific reasons for appeal with the required fee Io the City of Edmonds Planning Division, 121 - 51h Ave: N, Edmonds, WA 880211, ubilehodr September 19, 2017. EDH777606 C�1 Packet Pg. 312 2.2.a Machuga, Jen From: Lynne Danielson <Lynned@ovwater.com> Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2017 3:53 PM To: Machuga, Jen Subject: RE: SEPA DNS for 720 13th Way SW, Edmonds (PLN20170028) Jen, The District has no comments on the DNS and SEPA. The drywells proposed for stormwater are located outside of the surface water protection zone. Thank you. Lynne Danielson, General Manager Olympic View Water and Sewer District 8128 228" St SW Edmonds WA 98026 From: Kelly Boswell Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2017 1:48 PM To: Lynne Danielson <Lynned@ovwater.com> Subject: FW: SEPA DNS for 720 13th Way SW, Edmonds (PLN20170028) From: Cunningham, Diane[mailto:Diane.Cunningham@edmondswa.gov] Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2017 1:44 PM To: SEPA Unit <sepaunit@ecy.wa.gov>; 'Bill Trimm' <bill@townofwoodway.com>; 'DAHP' <sepa@dahp.wa.gov>; 'David Matulich' <david.matulich@pse.com>; 'Kate Tourtellot' <kate.tourtellot@commtrans.org>; Kelly Boswell <KellyB@ovwater.com>; 'Shannon Fleming'<shannon.fleming@co.snohomish.wa.us>; 'SnoPUD' <mlwicklund@snopud.com>;'Zachary Lamebull' <zlamebull@tulaliptribes-nsn.gov>; Zweber, Kevin <Kevin.Zweber@edmondswa.gov>; 'Brian Harding' <hardingb@edmonds.wednet.edu> Subject: SEPA DNS for 720 13th Way SW, Edmonds (PLN20170028) Attached is a DNS and environmental checklist (with staff's comments) for the Jenkins Lane 5-Lot plat at 720 13th Way SW, Edmonds. Please contact Jen Machuga at len.machuga@edmondswa.gov or 425.771.0220. Thank you, Diane I Diane.Cunninxham@edmondswa.xov :unninaham City of Edmonds Planning Division 121 5ch Ave. N Edmonds, WA 98020 425.771.0220 x 1335 ATTACH Packet Pg. 313 2.2.a Aerial Photograph Jenkins Lane Plat 720 13th Way SW PLN20170028 ,I?" 18y, Scale 1 inch = 40 feet ATTACH Packet Pg. 314