The URL can be used to link to this page

2018-08-01 Architectural Design Board Packeto Agenda Edmonds Architectural Design Board snl. ynyo COUNCIL CHAMBERS 250 5TH AVE NORTH, EDMONDS, WA 98020 AUGUST 1, 2018, 7:00 PM 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approval of Draft Minutes of April 4, 2018 3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA 4. AUDIENCE COMMENTS 5. MINOR PROJECTS 6. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Public Hearing on proposed Paradise Heights Condominiums for a three 4-unit multifamily residential buildings, landscaping and associated site improvements. Site is located at 546 Paradise Lane. (File #PLN20180025) 7. CONSOLIDATED PERMIT APPLICATIONS 1. Edmonds-Woodway High School Synthetic Turf Conversion 8. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS / ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION 9. ADB MEMBER COMMENTS 10. ADJOURNMENT Edmonds Architectural Design Board Agenda August 1, 2018 Page 1 2.1 Architectural Design Board Agenda Item Meeting Date: 08/1/2018 Approval of Draft Minutes of April 4, 2018 Staff Lead: N/A Department: Planning Division Prepared By: Diane Cunningham Background/History Staff Recommendation Review and approve the draft minutes Narrative Attachments: ADB180404d Packet Pg. 2 2.1.a CITY OF EDMONDS ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN BOARD Minutes of Regular Meeting April 4, 2018 Chair Walker called the meeting of the Architectural Design Board to order at 7:00 p.m., at the City Council Chambers, 250 - 5' Avenue North, Edmonds, Washington. Board Members Present Tom Walker, Chair Lauri Strauss, Vice Chair Cary Guenther Joe Herr Athene Tarrant Joshua Shope APPROVAL OF MINUTES Board Members Absent Lois Broadway Staff Present Mike Clugston, Senior Planner Karin Noyes, Recorder BOARD MEMBER GUENTHER MOVED THAT THE MINUTES OF OCTOBER 18, 2017 BE APPROVED AS SUBMITTED. BOARD MEMBER TARRANT SECONDED THE MOTION, WHICH CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. APPROVAL OF AGENDA VICE CHAIR STRAUSS MOVED THAT THE AGENDA BE MODIFIED TO ADD "ELECTION OF OFFICERS" UNDER ITEM 8 (ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS). BOARD MEMBER GUENTHER SECONDED THE MOTION, WHICH CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. The remainder of the agenda was accepted as presented. REQUESTS FROM THE AUDIENCE: No one in the audience indicated a desire to address the Board during this portion of the meeting. MINOR PROJECTS: SIGN MODIFICATION AT 22019 HIGHWAY 99 (PLN20170060) Mr. Clugston presented the Staff Report, advising that the applicant, Edmonds Village LLC, is seeking relief from the sign code to be able to apply signage on a nonqualifying building frontage at 22019 Highway 99. The application is tricky because the proposed new building has not been approved yet. The development application (BLD20171452) is currently being reviewed by staff. He noted that design drawings for the proposed project were attached to the Staff Report (Pages 26-28). Mr. Clugston explained that sign permits are typically reviewed by staff for code compliance according to ECDC 20.60.105.A. However, review by the Architectural Design Board (ADB) is required for an application that requests modifications to any of the sign code standards. In this case, the applicant is requesting a modification to allow signage Architectural Design Board Meeting Minutes of Regular Meeting April4,2018 Pagel of 5 Packet Pg. 3 2.1.a on the north fagade, which is a nonqualifying building fagade. The project does not require a public hearing, but the Board must review the request and make the final decision. Mr. Clugston advised that the subject site is located at the southeastern corner of Highway 99 and 220' Street SW. The existing building at 22019 Highway 99 has a sign on the north fagade that was approved in early 2000. It is now nonconforming because the fagade is a not a qualifying building frontage per ECDC 20.60.025.A.2. Although nonconforming signs can be maintained, they cannot be expanded, extended, rebuilt, reconstructed or altered in any way except for replacing a sign face. Again, Mr. Clugston advised that Edmonds Village LLC currently has a building permit in review at the City for an extensive remodel of the existing building. As proposed, the north wall would be removed and reconstructed with a drive- thru window. The existing nonconforming sign would be removed as part of the project and could not be replaced because the north wall of the proposed new building would not be a qualifying fagade. The applicant is seeking a modification to allow a sign on the north fagade. He referred to the renderings of the proposed elevations, noting that they show only the applicant's desired fagade appearances and signage, not what has been approved or could be approved. Mr. Clugston reminded the Board that, as per ECDC 20.60.015.13, the Board can only approve modification requests that arise from one of the following two conditions: The request is for signage on a site that has a unique configuration, such as frontage on more than two streets, or has an unusual geometric shape or topography. Mr. Clugston explained that the site is rectangular in shape and fronts only two streets, but the subject building sits towards the middle of the larger site and the site slopes gradually down to the east. There are three existing curb cuts to the site off of Highway 99 and two off of 220' Street SW. Viewing the subject building from entrances on 220' Street SW, where the site topography is lower, is a challenge. Therefore, the request for signage on the north fagade is not unreasonable. However, signage on the north fagade would not be visible from the south left turn lane on Highway 99 as indicated by the applicant in Attachment D of the Staff Report. He referred to photographs on Pages 37-39 of the Staff Report, which were taken from various locations around the site to provide context for the requested modification. He also referred to photographs on Pages 40-42 of the Staff Report, which illustrate what the site looks like from a car driving up the hill on 220' Street SW. If you look hard, you can see the existing sign on the existing building. Because of the unique access setup and the topography of the site, staff believes that the request meets this condition. • The request is for signage on a building that has unique architectural elements or features or details that substantially restrict the placement or size of signage relative to other buildings in the vicinity. Mr. Clugston advised that staff does not believe this condition is present. The proposed remodel does not have architectural elements that substantially restrict the placement or size of signage compared to other buildings in the area. Mr. Clugston advised that, if the Board agrees that the requested modification meets at least one of the two conditions (see above), they must also consider the following two criteria: • The design of the proposed signage must be compatible in its use of materials, colors, design andproportions with development throughout the site and with similar signage in the vicinity. Looking at the proposed elevation drawings on Pages 26-28 of the Staff Report, Mr. Clugston said it appears that the proposed new signs on the north fagade would be consistent with the site's overall sign design theme. The new signs will provide a fresh look for the building and be more attractive than what currently exists. • In no event shall the modification result in signage that exceeds the maximum normally allowed by more than 50 percent, Mr. Clugston advised that the applicant is not requesting any additional sign area. Architectural Design Board Meeting Minutes of Regular Meeting April 4, 2018 Page 2 of 5 Packet Pg. 4 2.1.a Mr. Clugston summarized staff s belief that the sign modification request seems premature and not well considered. However, it does meet the situational requirement for review, as well as the criteria for approval. Therefore, staff is recommending approval with the following conditions: A. The approval is valid for wall signage on the north facade if a drive-thru window is approved and constructed at 22019 Highway 99 pursuant to BLD20171452. If the application in BLD20171452 is not approved or is revised to not include a drive-thm window on the north wall, this sign modification approval is null and void. B. A building permit is required for signs pursuant to ECDC 20.60.010. C. In accordance with ECDC 20.12.090.A, this approval must be acted on within 18 months of the date of approval, unless an extension request is timely filed and approved per ECDC 20.12.090.13. It was noted that the applicant was not present to present his/her proposal. Board Member Herr pointed out that there are currently signs on the south facade of the existing retail building located to the north of the proposed building renovation. By allowing these signs on a nonqualifying facade, the City has already set a precedence. Mr. Clugston responded by clarifying that qualified facades are those that front on a street or those that have a main pedestrian entrance. In the case of the existing retail building, the main pedestrian entrance is located on the south facade. If a pedestrian entrance were added to the north facade of the proposed building renovation, it would be considered a qualifying facade, too. Vice Chair Strauss asked if the "coffee" sign on the south facade of the subject building is code compliant. Mr. Clugston answered that it is not because the south facade is not considered a qualifying facade. He said the Staff Report makes note of this and clearly states that a sign on the south facade would require ADB approval. The applicant has discussed the idea of adding a pedestrian entrance to the south facade, but it is not shown on the current drawings. Vice Chair Strauss asked if the sign and the pedestrian entrance would have to be tied to the same retail space. Board Member Herr answered that the code does not require that the sign must be for the business with the pedestrian entrance. It simply requires that there be a pedestrian access in order to be a qualified facade. Mr. Clugston confirmed that is the case. Board Member Tarrant said she supports the proposed modification for this particular site. She emphasized that signage is important on a 45 mile -per -hour roadway. From a safety standpoint, the more visible the sign, the more clearly people will know where they are going. As the project progresses, it would also be helpful to provide some signage along the street for people to see as they approach the site. If people are able to identify where they are going, they can make safer turns into the property, avoiding the need to slam on the breaks at the last minute. Board Member Guenther asked how the total sign area is calculated for the subject property. Mr. Clugston answered that the allowable sign area is measured on the west facade only, which equates to about 85 Square feet. This total sign area can be applied to signs on the facade of the building or a pole sign. If the applicant's request for a modification is approved, the sign area would stay at 85 square feet, but there would also be a sign on the north facade. If the applicant were to add a pedestrian entrance on the south facade, the total sign area would increase. Board Member Guenther asked if the additional sign area allowed via a pedestrian entrance on the south facade could also result in additional sign area on the north facade. Mr. Clugston answered that the additional sign area would not apply to the north facade. Vice Chair Strauss expressed her belief that a sign on the north facade would be of little value because it would only be visible from the street for a few seconds as a car drives by. She said she has driven by this corner a lot and has rarely noticed the building that is set back from the street. She did not believe that a sign would help the situation. Board Member Herr commented that once the building is renovated to an increased height, it would be more visible from the street. Board Member Shope agreed and asked if the proposed renovation includes a two-story building. Mr. Clugston answered that Architectural Design Board Meeting Minutes of Regular Meeting April 4, 2018 Page 3 of 5 Packet Pg. 5 2.1.a the current rendition for the building permit identifies a two-story structure. Board Member Shope felt that a taller building would be more visible from the street. Chair Walker commented that the applicant's request for a modification appears to be reasonable, particularly given the topography change coming up the hill on 220' Street SW. Having a sign on the building would be helpful. He concluded that, all around, the renovated building would look better than what is there now. Board Member Tarrant commented that signs are not just needed to direct people who are looking for a business, they are also used for advertising. They want businesses in Edmonds to do well, and she supports the staff s recommendation. BOARD MEMBER GUENTHER MOVED THAT, BASED ON THE FINDINGS OF FACT, ANALYSIS AND ATTACHMENTS IN THE STAFF REPORT, THE ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN BOARD APPROVE THE REQUESTED MODIFICATION TO ALLOW SIGNAGE ON THE NONQUALIFYING BUILDING FACADE BECAUSE IT MEETS THE CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL IN ECDC 20.60.015 AND IS CONSISTENT WITH THE DESIGN REVIEW CRITERIA FOUND IN THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. HE FURTHER MOVED THAT THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS MUST BE SATISFIED: A. THIS APPROVAL IS VALID ONLY FOR WALL SIGNAGE ON THE NORTH FAQADE IF A DRIVE- THRU WINDOW IS APPROVED AND CONSTRUCTED AT 22019 HIGHWAY 99 PURSUANT TO BLD20171452. IF THE APPLICATION IN BLD20171452 IS NOT APPROVED OR IS REVISED TO NOT INCLUDE A DRIVE-THRU WINDOW ON THE NORTH WALL, THIS SIGN MODIFICATION APPROVAL IS NULL AND VOID. B. A BUILDING PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR SIGNS PURSUANT TO ECDC 20.60.010. C. IN ACCORDANCE WITH ECDC 20.12.090.A, THIS APPROVAL MUST BE ACTED ON WITHIN 18 MONTHS OF THE DATE OF APPROVAL, UNLESS AN EXTENSION REQUEST IS TIMELY FILED AND APPROVED PER ECDC 20.12.090.B. BOARD MEMBER HERR SECONDED THE MOTION, WHICH CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. PUBLIC HEARING: There were no public hearings. CONSOLIDATED PERMIT APPLICATIONS (No Public Participation): There were no consolidated permit applications. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS/ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION: Election of Officers BOARD MEMBER GUENTHER NOMINATED BOARD MEMBER STRAUSS TO SERVE AS CHAIR OF THE BOARD IN 2018. BOARD MEMBER WALKER SECONDED THE NOMINATION. THERE WERE NO OTHER NOMINATIONS, AND THE NOMINATION WAS APPROVED UNANIMOUSLY. BOARD MEMBER STRAUSS NOMINATED BOARD MEMBER HERR TO SERVE AS VICE CHAIR OF THE BOARD IN 2018. BOARD MEMBER WALKER SECONDED THE NOMINATION. THERE WERE NO OTHER NOMINATIONS, AND THE NOMINATION WAS APPROVED UNANIMOUSLY. Architectural Design Board Meeting Minutes of Regular Meeting April 4, 2018 Page 4 of 5 Packet Pg. 6 2.1.a ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN BOARD MEMBER COMMENTS: The Board Member welcomed new member, Joshua Shope. The Board asked if there are any projects on the calendar for Architectural Design Board review. Mr. Clugston answered that he anticipates the Edmonds School District's project to redo the baseball field at Edmonds Woodway High School will come before the Board in June. There are a few other larger projects that are working their way through the process, as well. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 7:32 p.m. Architectural Design Board Meeting Minutes of Regular Meeting April4,2018 Page 5 of 5 Packet Pg. 7 6.1 Architectural Design Board Agenda Item Meeting Date: 08/1/2018 Public Hearing on proposed Paradise Heights Condominiums for a three 4-unit multifamily residential buildings, landscaping and associated site improvements. Site is located at 546 Paradise Lane. (File #PLN20180025) Staff Lead: Mike Clugston Department: Planning Division Prepared By: Mike Clugston Background/History This redevelopment proposal is for three 4-unit multifamily residential buildings, landscaping and associated site improvements at 546 Paradise Lane. Frontage improvements would be required along the south side of Paradise Lane. The existing single family house built in 1922 and related improvements would be removed. A nearly identical proposal received ADB approval in 2007 (PLN20070061) but the project was ultimately not constructed. Staff Recommendation Based on the findings, analysis, conclusions, and attachments with the staff report, staff recommends that the ADB approve the design for the proposed Paradise Heights project in PLN20180025 with conditions. Narrative Refer to the attached staff report and attachments. Attachments: PLN20180025 staff report w attachments Packet Pg. 8 6.1.a `1�C. 18y%J CITY OF EDMONDS 121 5th Avenue North, Edmonds WA 98020 Phone: 425.771.0220 • Fax: 425.771.0221 • Web: www.edmondswa. ov DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT • PLANNING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION REPORT TO THE ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN BOARD Project: Paradise Heights File Number: PLN20180025 Date of Report: July 25018�� Staff Contact: 1- �f� Mike Clugston, AICP, Senior Planner ADB Meeting: Wednesday —August 1, 2018 at 7:00 P.M. Edmonds Public Safety Complex: Council Chambers 250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds WA 98020 I. PROJECT PROPOSAL This redevelopment proposal is for three 4-unit multifamily residential buildings, landscaping and associated site improvements at 546 Paradise Lane. Frontage improvements would be required along the south side of Paradise Lane. The existing single family house built in 1922 and related improvements would be removed. II. FINDINGS, ANALYSIS & CONCLUSIONS A. PROCESS Design review is required for this project as indicated in Section 20.10.020.A of the Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC). Due to its location and because it required a SEPA threshold determination, general design review is required (ECDC 20.10.010.C) by the Architectural Design Board (ADB) using the requirements in ECDC 20.11. Findings must be made relative to the design criteria in ECDC 20.11.030, the urban design chapter of the Community Culture and Urban Design Element of the Comprehensive Plan, and the zoning ordinance. A Type III-B permit, the Design Board conducts a public hearing to receive testimony and establish the record and then issues the final decision. The following Attachments are included with this report: 1. Land use application 2. Applicant narrative Packet Pg. 9 6.1.a Paradise Heights PLN20180025 3. Aerial photos 4. Zoning map 5. Project plans, including: Plot, utility and grading plan (131) Proposed view from Paradise Lane Building A elevations Building B elevations Building C elevations Landscape plan (1-1) Site cross sections (P2) 6. Lighting detail 7. Notice of complete application and public notice documentation 8. SEPA DNS and checklist 9. Jill Wellington comment 10. Jacquee Owens comment 11. Bill Metzger comment 12. Snohomish PUD comment 13. WSDOT comment 14. Staff review comments and correspondence 15. Preliminary geotechnical report B. SETTING 1. Address: 546 Paradise Lane (Tax ID: 27032400302600) 2. Zoning: Multiple Residential (RM-2.4) 3. Comprehensive Plan designation: Multi Family — Medium Density within the Westgate Corridor 4. Neighborhood: The project site is located at the western end of the Westgate Corridor where SR-104 (Edmonds Way) descends into the Bowl (Attachments 3 & 4). The parcel is a peninsula surrounded on the three side by rights -of -way (Paradise Lane and SR-104). Immediately adjacent to the southeast are single family (RS-6) zoned and developed parcels. The larger area is a mix of single and multi -family residential development with commercial development further to the southeast along Edmonds Way. 5. Environment: The bulk of the site is generally level with short steep slopes down off to the north and west. A critical area determination was recently completed for the site which identified the steep slopes as potential erosion and landslide hazard areas. The site is currently well treed as are the adjacent right-of-way areas. C. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The proposal is subject to the design guidance found in the 2016 Comprehensive Plan's Urban Design Element (pages 123 - 125). There is guidance for all types of multifamily and commercial development so only that guidance that applies to multiple residential projects will Page 2 of 15 Packet Pg. 10 6.1.a Paradise Heights PLN20180025 be analyzed for this review. Refer to Attachment 5 for project plans and color renderings and Attachment 2 for the applicant's analysis of the project relative to the design guidance. Design Objectives for Site Design. The development of parking lots, pedestrian walkways and landscaping features is an integral part of how a building interacts with its site and its surrounding environment. Good design and site planning improves access by pedestrians, bicycles and automobiles, minimizes potential negative impacts to adjacent development, reinforces the character and activities within a district and builds a more cohesive and coherent physical environment. A.1 Vehicular Access. Reduce the numbers and width of driveways (curb cuts) in order to improve pedestrian, bicycle and auto safety. A.2 Layout of Parking. Locating buildings in proximity to the street to facilitate direct pedestrian access and help define the street edge. Parking should be placed to the side and rear. A.3 Connections On- and Offsite. Design site access and circulation within and between sites to encourage linkages for pedestrians, vehicles, and bicycles. Special attention should be paid to providing and improving connections to transit. A.4 Building Entry Location. Building entries should be configured to provide clear entry points to buildings, be oriented to pedestrian walkways/pathways, and support the overall intent of the streetscape environment. Space at the entry for gathering or seating is desirable for residential or mixed use buildings. A.5 Setbacks. Create and maintain the landscape and site characteristics of each neighborhood area and provide a common street frontage tying each site to its neighbor. Setbacks should be appropriate to the desired streetscape, providing for transition areas between public streets and private building entries where a variety of activities and amenities can occur. A.6 Open Space. For residential settings, create green spaces to enhance the visual attributes of the development and provide places for interaction, play, seating, and other activities. A.7 Building/Site Identity. Improve pedestrian access and way finding by providing variety in building forms, colors, materials and individuality of buildings. A.8 Weather Protection. Provide covered walkways and entries for pedestrian weather protection. A.9 Lighting. Provide adequate and appropriate illumination in all areas used by automobiles, bicycles and pedestrians — including building entries, walkways, parking areas, circulation areas and other open spaces — to support activity and security. A.10 Signage. Encourage signage that provides clear information and direction for properties and businesses while preventing the streetscape from becoming Page 3 of 15 Packet Pg. 11 Paradise Heights PLN20180025 6.1.a cluttered. Encourage the use of graphics and symbols in signage to support the city's emphasis on uniqueness and the arts. A.11 Site Utilities, Storage, Trash and Mechanical Systems. Minimize the noise, odor and visual impacts of utility systems using such features as landscaping, building forms, or integrated design. A.12 Integrating Site Features. Integrate natural landscape features and unique landforms — such as rocky outcroppings or significant trees — into site design whenever possible. A.13 Landscape Buffers. Use landscaping and/or other features such as fences to maintain privacy and create a visual barrier between incompatible uses. These buffering techniques should also be used to soften hard edges (such as the perimeters of parking lots) and reinforce pedestrian ways and circulation routes. Native plants and rain gardens should be promoted as alternatives to lawns and runoff retention areas. Analysis of Site Design: While the proposed multifamily project would be a more intense use of the site than what currently exists, it would fit well within the context of the site and surrounding neighborhood. The project is broken into three buildings which creates more of a pedestrian scale when viewed from Paradise Lane. Proposed landscaping would provide some visual buffer to that side of the site. The existing curb cut onto Paradise would be brought up to standard and reused and tied in with frontage improvements along the south side of the road. Required off-street parking would be located within the individual buildings and so would not be seen from Paradise Lane. Pedestrian connections are proposed to link each building entrance to a pathway and stairs north of Buildings B and C which lead down to street level. This provides good access to the walking path on the north side of Paradise Lane down into the Bowl along Edmonds Way. Trash and recycling would be managed within each unit and lighting and mechanical systems typical of small multifamily buildings is proposed. Design Objectives for Building Form. Building height and modulation guidelines are essential to create diversity in building forms, minimize shadows cast by taller buildings upon the pedestrian areas and to ensure compliance with policies in the city's Comprehensive Plan. Protecting views from public parks and building entries as well as street views to the mountains and Puget Sound are an important part of Edmonds character and urban form. A.14 Building Form. Encourage new construction to avoid repetitive, monotonous building forms. A.15 Massing. Reduce the apparent bulk and mass of buildings by encouraging human scale elements in building design and/or by subdividing building masses vertically or horizontally. Page 4 of 15 Packet Pg. 12 Paradise Heights PLN20180025 6.1.a A.16 Roof Modulation. Use roof forms to help identify different programs or functional areas within the building and support differentiation of building form and massing. Roof design, in combination with wall modulation, can allow for additional light to enter buildings or pedestrian spaces. A.17 Wall Modulation. Variation in materials, decorative elements, or other features should be employed to support pedestrian scale environments and streetscapes, or to help break up large building masses to keep in scale with the surrounding environment. Analysis of Building Form: The proposed buildings use a mix of materials along with wall and roof modulation to reduce apparent mass and create pedestrian scale. Design Objectives for Building Facade. Building facade objectives ensure that the exterior of a building — the portion of a building that defines the character and visual appearance of a place — is of high quality and demonstrates the strong sense of place and integrity valued by the residents of the City of Edmonds. A.18 Building Facade Design. Encourage building fagades that reinforce the appearance and consistency of streetscape patterns while supporting diversity and identity in building design. A.19 Window Variety and Articulation. Use window size and placement to help define the scale and character of the building. Use the organization and combinations of window types to reinforce the streetscape character or to provide variation in a facade, as well as provide light and air to the building interior. A.20 Variation in Facade Materials. Employ variation in materials, colors or design elements on building fagades to help define the scale and style of the structure. Variation in facade materials can help reduce the apparent bulk of larger buildings while allowing variety and individuality of building design. Analysis of Building Facade: The proposed architectural style is reminiscent of a craftsman appearance which is seen throughout Edmonds. Each facade includes a variety of materials, window sizes, and articulation with roof overhangs and knee braces. Staff Conclusion Staff finds that the proposal is consistent with the design guidance in the Comprehensive Plan for Site Design, Building Form, and Building Facade. D. APPLICABLE ZONING CODES Compliance with all codes will be verified through the review and approval of building and engineering permits. 1. ECDC 16.30 Multiple Residential (RM) a. Use. Multiple dwellings are a primary permitted use in the RM zone per ECDC 16.30.030.A.1. Page 5 of 15 Packet Pg. 13 6.1.a Paradise Heights PLN20180025 b. Site development standards, per ECDC 16.30.030.B: Zone RM-2.4 Minimum Lot Area Minimum per Street Dwelling Setback Unit (Sq. Ft.) 2,400 15' Minimum Minimum Maximum Side Rear Height Setback Setback I _ 1_ 10, 15, 25" Maximum Structural Lot Coverage 45 1 Roof only may extend five feet above the stated height limit if all portions of the roof above the stated height limit have a slope of four inches in 12 inches or greater. Dweiling Units: The subject property is 0.69 acres (30,013 square feet). At 2,400 square feet of lot area per dwelling unit, a maximum of 12 dwelling units are possible and 12 are proposed. Height: The plans in Attachment 5 show height calculations for each of the three buildings. The height rectangles for Buildings A and C will need to be updated (the elevations of Corner D and Corner B, respectively, need to be averaged in accordance with ECDC 21.40.030.6) but each building is less than the base 25' height limit. Each building has a 4:12 roof up to the maximum 30' and uses allowed height exceptions in ECDC 21.40.030.D for elevator penthouses and chimneys. Setbacks: Sheet P1 of Attachment 5 shows the irregularly shaped lot. Street setbacks (15 feet) are taken from the property lines adjacent to the Paradise Lane and SR-104 rights -of - way while side setbacks (10 feet) would be taken from the east and south property lines. The proposed buildings appear to meet the minimum setback requirements of the RM-2.4 zone. No parking is located within the street setbacks in accordance with ECDC 16.30.030.C. Eaves, chimneys and similar minor improvements may project up to 30 inches into required setbacks in accordance with ECDC 16.30.040.C. It appears that some eaves would project slightly into setbacks on the north, west and a short portion of the southwest at Building A. Structures like fences up to 6 feet in height and retaining walls, rockeries and similar minor improvements up to 3 feet in height (above original grade) may be located with required setbacks. On Sheet L1, a 4-foot fence with arbor is shown along a portion of the south property line with a low wall along the east line. Page 6 of 15 Packet Pg. 14 6.1.a Paradise Heights PLN20180025 Structural lot coverage: Since the lot is 30,013 square feet, the three proposed buildings can cover no more than 45% of the site or approximately 13,500 square feet. Coverage of 12,441 square feet is proposed. 2. ECDC 17.50 Off Street Parking Regulations According to ECDC 17.50.020.A.1.b, the number of parking spaces required per dwelling unit in multifamily projects is based upon the number of bedrooms per unit. Sheet P1 of Attachment 5 shows that four two -bedroom units and eight three -bedroom units are proposed. Per the ECDC, 2-bedroom units require 1.8 spaces while 3 or more bedrooms require 2.0 spaces for a total of 23 off-street stalls for this development. A total of 24 off- street parking spaces are proposed within the buildings. Per ECDC 18.95, required off-street parking spaces must be individually accessible. The 24 stalls shown are individually accessible. Additional tandem or stacked stalls are allowed. While encouraged, no guest parking is required and none is provided with this project. The proposed frontage improvements along the south side of Paradise Lane would likely create some additional on -street parking spaces, however. 3. ECDC 18.45 Land Clearing and Tree Cutting According to ECDC 18.45.035, projects requiring design review by the ABD are exempt from the application and procedural requirements of the tree code except that ADB review of clearing proposals must be consistent with and apply the standards in ECDC 18.45. The landscaping plan (Sheet L1 of Attachment 5) shows the proposed site landscaping. Several trees on the project site are proposed to be retained during redevelopment. Retained trees must be protected in accordance with ECDC 18.45.050.H. 4. ECDC 20.02 Development Project Permit Applications The applicant applied for design review on March 27, 2018 and the application was determined to be technically complete on April 24, 2018. Additional requests for supplemental information and clarifications were subsequently made but the project could proceed with public notice requirements. 5. ECDC 20.03 Public Notice Requirements A "Notice of Application" was published in the Herald Newspaper, posted at the subject site, as well as the Public Safety Complex, Community Development Department, and the Library on May 8, 2018 (Attachment 7). Notices were also mailed to property owners within 300 feet of the site. A "Notice of Public Hearing" for the Architectural Design Board was subsequently advertised in the same manner on July 18, 2018. PUBLIC COMMENTS Five public comments were received (Attachments 9 —13). Three were comments from residents who own property nearby and have concerns regarding traffic, pedestrian safety, and changes to the local environment. Two comments were also received from reviewing agencies (Snohomish County PUD and Washington State Department of Transportation). Page 7 of 15 Packet Pg. 15 6.1.a Paradise Heights PLN20180025 PUD noted that there is sufficient electric system capacity in the area but that any improvements needed to serve the proposed development must be paid for by the developer. WSDOT briefly discussed how stormwater management should occur; compliance with stormwater requirements in the City's code (Chapter 18.30 ECDC) will be reviewed and confirmed by City staff during building permit review. The concerns of the other three commenters are discussed below. As with any redevelopment, there would be changes to the local area compared to what is there now; that is unavoidable. However, as described in this report, the design of the proposed project can satisfy the applicable zoning and development codes that apply to it and impacts of the project can be effectively managed by those codes. This would be confirmed in detail by eventual review and approval of building and engineering permits and subsequent inspections as the project is built to make sure it is constructed in accordance with the approved plans. Regarding traffic and access, while there would be some additional traffic created by the new dwelling units, those impacts are addressed through improvements to Paradise Lane and the collection of impact fees, both of which are paid for by the developer. The proposed project is at the end of a cul-de-sac on the south side of Paradise Lane which not being extended to connect with Edmonds Way. As shown on Sheet P1 of Attachment 5, the existing curb cut to 546 Paradise would be upgraded to serve as the sole access to the redeveloped site. Frontage improvements including a widening of the street along with the addition of curb, gutter and sidewalk on the south side of Paradise would improve pedestrian safety in the area. Traffic impact fees, based on the number of dwelling units, are collected when building permits are issued. Traffic impacts during construction of a project like this are addressed through approval of a traffic control plan during building permit review. With respect to loss of tree canopy on the site, it is true that the canopy would change in order to accommodate the proposed buildings, driveways and related improvements. As seen on Sheet L1 of Attachment 5, of the 17 evergreen trees now on the site, 13 of those would be removed (a clump maple and two laurels are also proposed to be removed). However, four evergreens are proposed to be retained on the site and new landscaping would be added to buffer the site in accordance with the landscaping code in Chapter 20.13 ECDC. As can be seen in Attachment 3, there are a number of existing trees between the project site and SR-104 that would remain since those are in the state right-of-way. Those trees would continue to provide buffering to the project site and Paradise Lane area. 6. ECDC 20.11 General Design Review Criteria Per ECDC 20.10 (Design Review), General Design Review is required for this project since it is not located within an area that has district -based design standards. ECDC 20.11.030 lists the general criteria for Building Design, Site Treatment, and Other Criteria that must be met by the proposal. Refer to Attachment 5 for project plans and color renderings and Attachment 2 for the applicant's analysis of the project relative to the design criteria. Page 8 of 15 Packet Pg. 16 6.1.a Paradise Heights PLN20180025 A. ECDC 20.11.030.A. Building Design. No one architectural style is required. The building shall be designed to comply with the purposes of this chapter and to avoid conflict with the existing and planned character of the nearby area. All elements of building design shall form an integrated development, harmonious in scale, line and mass. The following are included as elements of building design: 1. All exterior building components, including windows, doors, eaves, and parapets. The buildings use elements of the craftsman style. Numerous windows are used throughout and a variety of materials are proposed. 2. Colors, which should avoid excessive brilliance or brightness except where that would enhance the character of the area. No brilliant colors are proposed. 3. Mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on the roof, grounds or buildings should be screened from view from the street level. No exterior mechanical equipment is shown. The elevator penthouses are screened. The Applicant indicated that all mechanical equipment would be either screened or inside the buildings. A condition requiring screening is proposed. 4. Long, massive, unbroken or monotonous buildings shall be avoided in order to comply with the purposes of this chapter and the design objectives of the comprehensive plan. This criterion is meant to describe the entire building. All elements of the design of a building including the massing, building forms, architectural details and finish materials contribute to whether or not a building is found to be long, massive, unbroken or monotonous. Rather than one large building, the 12 proposed dwelling units are contained in three separate buildings. The buildings are not long, massive or monotonous. 5. All signs should conform to the general design theme of the development. No signage is proposed at this time. Signage will require a separate building permit in accordance with ECDC 20.60. B. ECDC20.11.030.B. Site Treatment. The existing character of the site and the nearby area should be the starting point for the design of the building and all site treatment. The following are elements of site treatment: 1. Grading, vegetation removal and other changes to the site shall be minimized where natural beauty exists. Large cut and fill and impervious surfaces should be avoided. The subject site is a slightly elevated peninsula at the end of Paradise Lane. Large cuts and fills would not be required and existing topography will largely be retained. Block walls would step the project down toward the road at the northwest end of the site near the cul-de-sac. Page 9 of 15 Packet Pg. 17 6.1.a Paradise Heights PLN20180025 2. Landscape treatment shall be provided to enhance the building design and other site improvements. Extensive landscaping is proposed along Paradise Lane to buffer the proposed improvements including trees, shrubs and ground covers. The existing trees within the SR-104 right-of-way would continue to buffer the site from the west and northwest. 3. Landscape treatment shall be provided to buffer the development from surrounding property where conflict may result, such as parking facilities near yard spaces, streets or residential units, and different building heights, design or color. A combination of new landscaping, existing trees, and a fence with arbor are proposed along the east and south property lines adjacent to the single family parcels. 4. Landscaping that could be damaged by pedestrians or vehicles should be protected by curbing or similar devices. Landscaping that could be damaged by vehicles is set off by curbs. 5. Service yards, and other areas where trash or litter may accumulate, shall be screened with planting or fences or walls which are compatible with natural materials. No service yards or exterior trash facilities are proposed. 6. All screening should be effective in the winter as well as the summer. The proposed landscaping is a mix of evergreen and deciduous trees. The existing trees off -site in the SR-104 right-of-way are a mix of evergreen and deciduous. 7. Materials such as wood, brick, stone and gravel (as opposed to asphalt or concrete) may be substituted for planting in areas unsuitable for plant growth. No such areas are proposed. 8. Exterior lighting shall be the minimum necessary for safety and security. Excessive brightness shall be avoided. All lighting shall be low-rise and directed downward onto the site. Lighting standards and patterns shall be compatible with the overall design theme. Wall sconces typical of residential developments are proposed (Attachment 6). No other exterior illumination is proposed. C. ECDC 20.11.030.C. Other Criteria. 1. Community facilities and public or quasi -public improvements should not conflict with the existing and planned character of the nearby area. Not applicable. 2. Street furniture (including but not limited to benches, light standards, utility poles, newspaper stands, bus shelters, planters, traffic signs and signals, guardrails, Page 10 of 15 Packet Pg. 18 6.1.a Paradise Heights PLN20180025 rockeries, walls, mail boxes, fire hydrants and garbage cans) should be compatible with the existing and planned character of the nearby area. No street furniture is proposed. The location for a mailbox has not be selected at this time. It is likely that the Post Office will require a joint mailbox, near or in the Paradise Lane right-of-way. 7. ECDC 20.13 Landscaping Requirements There are five types of landscaping that can be used throughout a site depending on the setting. For this particular site, a dense landscape buffer would be appropriate along the west and southwest sides of the site facing the busy SR-104 right-of-way (Type I landscaping). A mixed buffer (Type III) would be appropriate along the Paradise Lane frontage and on the south and east sides of the project where it is adjacent to single family residential parcels. While there are specific requirements for each of these landscaping types, the ADB may interpret and modify the requirements as long as the proposal is consistent with the purposes of the design review chapter in ECDC 20.10.000. These purposes include: A. To encourage the realization and conservation of a desirable and aesthetic environment in the city of Edmonds, B. To encourage and promote development which features amenities and excellence in the form of variations of siting, types of structures and adaptation to and conservation of topography and other natural features, C. To encourage creative approaches to the use of land and related physical developments, D. To encourage the enhancement and preservation of land or building of unique or outstanding scenic or historical significance, E. To minimize incompatible and unsightly surroundings and visual blight which prevent orderly community development and reduce community property values. The applicant is proposing to use a mix of new and existing landscaping on -site and existing landscaping off -site to satisfy the intent of the code. TYPE I Type I landscaping is intended to provide a very dense sight barrier to significantly separate uses and land use districts. 1. Two rows of evergreen trees, a minimum of 10 feet in height and planted at intervals of no greater than 20 feet on center. The trees must be backed by a sight -obscuring fence a minimum of five feet high or the required width of the planting area must be increased by 10 feet; and 2. Shrubs a minimum of three and one-half feet in height planted in an area at least five feet in width, and other plant materials, planted so that the ground will be covered within three years; Page 11 of 15 Packet Pg. 19 6.1.a Paradise Heights PLN20180025 3. Alternatively, the trees and shrubs maybe planted on an earthen berm at least 15 feet in width and an average of five feet high along its midline. As shown on Sheet L1 of Attachment 5, no on -site Type I landscaping is shown adjacent to the SR-104 right-of-way along the southwest property line (some landscaping is shown along the west property but that would not meet the Type I requirements). However, existing mature trees and vegetation within the right-of-way along those property lines meets or exceeds the Type I buffering required by the code. The existing off -site vegetation can also be seen on the aerial photos in Attachment 3. While off -site landscaping does not typically satisfy buffering requirements for new projects, in this case the ADB should consider interpreting the code in the broader context since it appears that the purposes of the landscaping chapter would be met. There is no development pressure in the right-of-way and WSDOT indicated in 2016 that there is no need to widen SR-104 at this time. As a result, the trees within the right-of-way will remain and the lower -growing vegetation will continue to be maintained as it has been. Should the Edmonds Crossing project move forward in the future, changes to the alignment of SR- 104 may be needed which could result in the removal of some or all of the trees and vegetation adjacent to Paradise Heights. However, that project has been put on hold indefinitely due to lack of funding. 109:1111Ill Type 111 landscaping is intended to provide visual separation of uses from streets, and visual separation of compatible uses so as to soften the appearance of streets, parking areas and building elevations. 1. Evergreen and deciduous trees, with no more than 50 percent being deciduous, a minimum of six feet in height, and planted at intervals no greater than 30 feet on center; and 2. If planted to buffer a building elevation, shrubs, a minimum of three and one-half feet in height, and living ground cover planted so that the ground will be covered within three years, or 3. If planted to buffer a parking area, access, or site development other than a building, any of the following alternatives may be used unless otherwise noted a. Shrubs, a minimum of three and one-half feet in height, and living ground cover must be planted so that the ground will be covered within three years b. Earth -mounding, an average of three and one-half feet in height, planted with shrubs or living ground cover so that the ground will be covered within three years. This alternative may not be used in a downtown or waterfront area. c. A combination of earth mounding, opaque fences and shrubs to produce a visual barrier at least three and one-half feet in height. Page 12 of 15 Packet Pg. 20 6.1.a Paradise Heights PLN20180025 Landscaping meeting the Type III criteria is shown along Paradise Lane and on the south and east sides of the project. Three existing fir trees will be retained and those will be supplemented with new evergreen and deciduous trees, numerous shrubs, and ground covers along the property line in some locations and closer to the buildings in others. A 4- foot fence with arbor is also proposed along the south property line. This combination of vegetative and physical screening meets the Type III requirements along the north, south and east sides of the site. Finally, per ECDC 20.13.020.E, automatic irrigation required for newly landscaped areas in ADB-approved projects and irrigation is proposed for this project. 8. ECDC 20.15A Environmental Review The scope of this project required an environmental determination. The City of Edmonds acted as lead agency for SEPA review and issued a Determination of Nonsignificance on May 8, 2018 (Attachment 8). No appeals were received. 9. ECDC 20.60 Sin Code No signage is proposed as part of this review. Per ECDC 20.60.025.13, the project could have one sign of up to 10 sq. ft. A building permit would be required. 10. ECDC 23.40 Environrnentally Critical Areas As mentioned previously, a critical area determination was recently completed for the site (CRA20170212) which identified steep slopes on and adjacent to the site. The associated geotechnical report (Attachment 15) indicates general feasibility of the project from a critical area perspective. This report will need to be updated to address specific project elements at building permit submittal; this is proposed as a condition of approval. Staff Conclusion Staff finds that the proposal is consistent with the applicable zoning requirements, as conditioned, or meets the intent of the code as in the case of landscaping. E. TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE The Engineering Division evaluated the feasibility of the project relative to the Public Works Requirements in Title 18 ECDC and the Building Division and South County Fire & Rescue did the same for the Building Codes in Title 19 ECDC (Attachment 14). Each group found the project to be feasible and will confirm code compliance at the building permit stage of the development review process. III. RECOMMENDATION Pursuant to ECDC 20.11.020, when recommending approval of applications, the ADB must find that the proposed development is consistent with the criteria listed in ECDC 20.11.030 (General Design Review), the Comprehensive Plan, and the zoning ordinance. Page 13 of 15 Packet Pg. 21 6.1.a Paradise Heights PLN20180025 Based on the findings, analysis, conclusions, and attachments with this report, staff recommends that the ADB APPROVE the design for the proposed Paradise Heights project with the following motion and recommended conditions of approval: THE ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN BOARD ADOPTS THE FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND ANALYSIS OF THE STAFF REPORT AND FINDS THE PARADISE HEIGHTS PROPOSAL IN FILE PLN20180025 IS CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, DESIGN CRITERIA OF ECDC 20.11.030, AND ZONING REGULATIONS AND THERERFORE APPROVES THE DESIGN OF THE PROJECT WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. An updated geotechnical report addressing the specific requirements of ECDC 23.80 is required at building permit submittal. 2. Retained trees must be protected during development in accordance with ECDC 18.45.050. H. 3. The proposed landscaping shown on Sheet L1 of Attachment 5 meets the intent of Chapter 20.13 of the ECDC. 4. All mechanical equipment must be screened from view at street level or inside the buildings. 5. Staff will verify compliance of the proposal with all relevant codes and land use permit conditions through review of building and engineering permits. Minor changes to the approved design may be approved by staff at the time of building permit without further design review by the Board as long as the design is substantially similar to that originally approved. IV. PARTIES OF RECORD City of Edmonds Jillian and Nick Wellington 545 Paradise Lane Edmonds, WA 98020 Bill Metzger Spinaker Condominiums 500 Paradise Lane, Unit 100 Edmonds, WA 98020 Paradise Heights HLD, LLC Rob Michel, Michel Design PO Box 1215 Lynnwood, WA 98046 Jacquee Owens PO Box 12922 Mill Creek, WA 98082 Jason Zyskowski Snohomish County PUD PO Box 1107 Everett, WA 98206 Page 14 of 15 Packet Pg. 22 6.1.a Paradise Heights PLN20180025 Peter Alm WSDOT — NW Region Devt Svcs Mail Stop 240 15700 Dayton Ave. N Seattle, WA 98133 Page 15 of 15 Packet Pg. 23 6.1.a City of Edmonds Land Use Application 0 ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN REVIEW ❑ COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT f q r} ❑ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FILE #Pw =9002 ZONE ❑ HOME OCCUPATION DATES SREC'D BY iS ❑ FORMAL SUBDMSION ❑ SHORT SUBDIVISION FEE 2� 5 RECEIPT # ❑ LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT HEARING DATE ❑ PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ❑ OFFICIAL STREET MAP AMENDMENT ❑ HE ❑ STAFF ❑ PBl ADB ❑ CC ❑ STREET VACATION ❑ REZONE ❑ SHORELINE PERMIT ❑ VARIANCE / REASONABLE USE EXCEPTION ❑ OTHER: PLEASE NOTE THAT ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED WITHIN TILE APPLICA TION IS A PUBLIC RECORD i PROPERTY ADDRESS OR LOCATION 546 Paradise Lane PROJECT NAME (IF APPLICABLE) _ Paradise Heights PROPERTY OWNER Paradise Heights HLD, LLC PHONE # 206-750-5965 ADDRESS 24144 E. Greystone Lane, Woodway, WA 98020 E-MAIL jsrett@gmail.com FAX# TAX ACCOUNT # 27032500302600 SEC. 25 Twp. 27N RNG. 3E DESCRIPTION OF PROJECTOR PROPOSED USE (ATTACH COVER LETTER AS NECESSARY) Construct Three New 4-unit Multi -family buildings RM2.4 DESCRIBE HOW THE PROJECT MEETS APPLICABLE CODES (ATTACH COVER LETTER AS NECESSARY) See attached 6 page Cover Letter. APPLICANT Paradise Heights HLD, LLC PHONE # 206-750-5965 ADDRESS 24144 E. Greystone Lane, Woodway, WA 98020 E-MAIL jsrett@gmail.com FAX# CONTACT PERSON/AGENT Robin W. Michel, Michel Design pHpNF# 206-930-2445 ADDRESS PO Box 1215 Lynnwood, WA 98046 E-MAIL rwmichel@nwlink.com FAX # The undersigned applicant, and his/her/its heirs, and assigns, in consideration on the processing of the application agrees to release, indemnify, defend and hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any and all damages, including reasonable attorney's fees, arising from any action or infraction based in whole or part upon false, misleading, inaccurate or incomplete information famished by the applicant, his/her/its agents or employees. By my signature, I certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that I am authorized to file this applicatia n the behalf of owner listed below. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT/AGENT DATE 3/27/2018 Property Owner's Authorization I, certify under the penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that the following is a true and correct statement: I have authorized the above Applicant/Agent to apply for the subject land use application, and grant my permission for the public officials and the staff of the City of Edmonds to enter the subject property for the purposes of inspection and posting attendant to this application. SIGNATURE OF OWNER DATE 3/27/2018 Questions? Call (425) 771-0220. Revised on 8122112 B - Land Use Application Page 1 of I N E E 0 0 U N t 2 as �a �a a c O E s �a �a 3 0 a m L O r N LO N O 0 w 0 N Z J a c as E U �a r Q Attachment 1 Packet Pg. 24 6.1.a r tv of Fdmnnriq Land Use Application HOW Or"-W" Lei sw 'Li 00S 9[amt suali " WT t,tN[ AW FtW xt fRAV, NVrk FdUM5'I£ MAL OFT"AL STWrEt WPAWND*VNT I .STRM,T }'.a4'at ['i(N.a REAPA£ SwiNtfuRf" PftitP. T ' V Adpu"' �E�4 1M�.. [At ` i Lul'P'd'M,ft HT' 9 rw , FS AM cc 0 ft"W WMTiOAd1 OlMA'ir,AMyA:"Wr4^"WMW MF 4PftKAM^ nA MAM)CAft OAS 0 Paris[ifsw >iea�r,t5 HLa, �.tC ��,-T5b$Si65 24' 44 E, (,nCl S?W* L arm ftwxlwt'ry WA 98M rAAA 44R1-0a2ri33?re7[� 1+�0.' _ 1Er` 2b t-wp 2 N 3e [ tai'F W3ONPItaNMOi (AMWO (UMM, i VMS AS ConsbW _ T*ft "vw4•ew* btu AM 4 [ti=h•.H sa rw Illt !Na d Yll.l r• yPr a E.atwk 4'T A{°F.1 A'1:T'e°k'0 L "TiF%�5+ rind plygv ct Letter A ar , LLC Fw ' St1 °5 6 ALx>Rls. 24144 E Qnoyooft LNW, VWVOWW, VO4 Y� ixr� j #1 sa ; as - -- -- - IFkx, v _ t'19" rAcrftmatlAom - R 1 w mi+p *, oo-w, pwx a + _ '44ta Atwaff" VOA- SOW FMAC Trw,A�7�hril rsathrtk Oewn i'I'll # _ 'TAR Awd uWbO6w hms, OW 0 ,4 k7 n400w 1!4pwillf. *Oxid Old bW dw CIO arfilmwati Whim fitift at� *vd Aft Mlllsftw�'9 FM3, W" tea ANY A" pro ad baooW "A vft* of pwa wm 66wwwft ar w e"woh1w 0.1 Owsv� dlu ft v wbrts MM Ow Md wrMa w me bew � xt� fat S an r#I.T�'rd +•'ik trtn AQAd�r[ t•r �rti' � •wnn stni [Ci.•r MOT" 3,27(2016 � !'rr�ny [Ma rr'. [ueMrerallwr , 6 ti� : f; 1 de`£ •�i f �Ya r c<t1. "o*� ktc to -Nr w il"nM, IeQN mt I&-- • r ati 'curt .: 5.k.�n.,l.�ararglnr Ih1[.Awb�r��fnrAr'.wl: o s'wYN and u�rzcl NwP,.awnM f 1wr mrlrrvr3 Nv 4br Ap{tw,00:1A=W up µ;Iy I'm t?w ..',y.+ qrW w¢ +{"^�^� and Mtn 1 {trttxvt�n dPr IAw Pal.r -a Itv Gaff A tilt [ .i1 vir t4,.,A- fi .t wi Ow { Awwwws Ca. tIh* O"O.A. u1 waoiii uw rrs ¢.wJ�j aAwmaAwri rPk Om NOVKwom Attachment 1 Packet Pg. 25 Owner Consent Agreement Far,adiW Ht-1,0-ts, RLD. 1A ( hereh� i�onsenLs to 4j�jjt:j Design WX - (URI �� 507-695), to act as Ngent and Lead Design Professionid to facilitate application for Architectural Design Board Approval. application for building permits, and other applications for development of (4) 4-unit multi -family buildings at property At 54,6 Paradise Lane, Edmonds. WA 98020. Michel Design will prepare appropriate docutnents. provide required drawings and retain required professionals in order to complete all requirements with the City of Edmonds, other government and utility - entities to skxury the Applications above. Signed by John S. Rettenmier, Member (.,)f Paradise I Rights HLD,LLC Attachment 1 I Packet Pg. 26 6.1.a 546 Paradise Lane Development Project: Three 4-Unit Condominiums Cover Letter The purpose of this cover letter is to: IIAEF00 NQR �VeAD (1) Describe, "how the proposal satisfies the applicable standards, requirements and criteria in the development regulations." As per the Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) 20.02.002 E. (2) Describe how the proposal is "consistent with the criteria listed in ECDC 20.11.030 in accordance with the techniques and objectives in the urban design chapter of the community culture and urban design element of the comprehensive plan." ECDC 20.11.020 (3) Describe how the proposal meets the purposes according to ECDC 20.10.000. (1) Standards, requirements and criteria in development regulations. (l.a.) ECDC 16 1. ECDC Chapter 16.30 permitted uses is multiple dwellings. Section 16.30.10 2. ECDC 16.30.030 Proposal meets all Site Development Standards. 3. ECDC 16.30.040 No Site Development exceptions proposed. (l.b.) ECDC 17 1. ECDC 17.50 Off Street Parking required is 23 parking spaces. 24 spaces are indicated on proposed Plot Plan. (l.c.) ECDC 20.13 1. ECDC 20.13.020 E. Automatic irrigation will be provided. Attachment 2 - PLN20180025 Packet Pg. 27 6.1.a (l.d.) ECDC 20.11.030 Criteria: A. Building design. 1. All exterior components including windows, doors and eaves are harmonious in style and consistency and do not conflict with homes or other buildings in the neighborhood. 2. Colors are not excessive in brilliance or brightness but show a respect to the neighbors by mirroring the earth tones of the existing tree trunks and other organic material. 3. All mechanical equipment is either totally screened or situated inside the buildings. 4. Each of the three buildings are not long, massive, unbroken or monotonous in and among themselves with the many "bump outs", deck details and various length roof features. Being three separate buildings instead of the traditional one massive building is more fitting of the character of the existing single-family homes in the area. 5. Any signage will conform to the general design theme of the proposed development. B. Site Development. 1. Grading is minimized to retain the existing level portion of the site. All trees that can be retained add to the overall natural feel of the proposal. Most of the trees that will be required to be removed are located in the street right of way in order to install all City of Edmonds required street frontage improvements. New trees are proposed in this area. 2. Landscaping will be provided to enhance the building design, separation of the buildings and other site improvements. 3. Landscaping is proposed to buffer the development from the one neighbor to the south. 4. Landscaping will be protected from pedestrians and vehicles. 5. Dumpster is to be screened by fences and plantings. Attachment 2 - PLN20180025 2 Packet Pg. 28 6.1.a 6. All screening will be effective in the winter months as well as the summer time. 7. All planting areas will be suitable for plant growth so no other materials will be needed in those areas. 8. Exterior lighting will be provided as only as the code requires and will not be excessive in brightness. C. Other Criteria. 1. No facilities or improvements will conflict with existing or planned character of the nearby area. 2. No Street Furniture is proposed. (2) Techniques and objectives in the urban design chapter of the community culture and urban design element of the comprehensive plan." ECDC 20.11.020 (2.a.) Urban Design Goal & Polices. Pages 122-125 Comprehensive Plan 1. General Design Goal A: 1. The proposal will improve the physical appearance and character of Edmonds by introducing new structures built to new earthquake and wind load standards that reflect some of the traditional features of many of the residences built through out the decades in the City. 2. The proposal will improve the pedestrian circulation by proving a city sidewalk along Paradise Lane connecting to the existing walkway along Edmonds to 5t'' Avenue. 3. The proposal will provide new business opportunities to the surrounding area businesses with the addition of 12 new families. 4. Sustainable design practices will be used to protect natural environments as feasibly possible as directed by ECDC. 5. The proposal for 3 buildings instead of the traditional one massive building will protect and enhance the residential character Attachment 2 - PLN20180025 3 Packet Pg. 29 6.1.a of Edmonds. 2. General Design Objectives: A.1. The proposal reduces the number of potential driveways by using one driveway for 3 buildings and 12 residential units. A.2 Proposed access to parking is through the rear of the project. No garage doors facing the city street. A.3 Installing new city sidewalk will help connect pedestrians to nearby transit. A.4 Topography prevents direct access to new city sidewalk but placing the entrance driveway to south and up hill provides level pedestrian access to buildings. A.5 Buildings are set back from the street providing for outdoor space for activities and community. A.6 The 3 separate buildings provide much desired open spaces for residents for activities and gatherings but also provide open spaces between buildings for neighbors to see through project to the mature evergreen trees that line the West Property line along Edmonds Way. A.7 Each building will have a different shape to help pedestrians to identify each building. A.8 Each entry will have weather protection. A.9 Lighting will be provided by code and not over bright to the respect of the neighboring homes. A.10 Signage will be limited to building address and one sign for project name per ECDC. A.11 Site utilities will screen to minimize noise, odor and visual impacts. A.12 Significant trees will be incorporated into the site design as per Attachment 2 - PLN20180025 Packet Pg. 30 6.1.a ECDC. A.13 Landscape buffers and some fences will be used to maintain privacy and soften hard edges. A.14 The proposed building form incorporates 3 smaller buildings instead of one massive building. A.15 The proposed 3 buildings reduce the massing associated with one larger building thus adding to the human scale elements. A.16 The many roof forms help identify functional areas in the residences which allows more light to enter the project. A.17 The variation of materials and wall modulation helps break up the potential for long massive walls. A.18 The proposed facades of the buildings reinforce the appearance and consistency of streetscape patterns and fits in well with the existing neighborhood. A.19 The variety of the window sizes help define the scale and the character of the buildings in addition to reinforces the streetscape character as well as providing for light and air into the buildings' interiors. A.20 The proposed variation in materials, colors and design help to define the scale and style of the buildings that helps reduce the apparent bulk, if any. (3) Purposes ECDC 20.10.000 A. The proposal encourages the realization and conservation of a desirable aesthetic environment in the City of Edmonds by choosing to provide 3 separate buildings instead of one massive building using modern construction techniques and materials that will serve the owners and community for many years to come. B. The proposed 3 new buildings feature amenities and excellence in form and function adapting to the existing topography and mature trees that border the site. Attachment 2 - PLN20180025 5 Packet Pg. 31 6.1.a C. The proposal has been creative in site placement, 3 buildings and adapted to existing site conditions. D. The proposal enhances the preservation of land and provides use of historical elements to relate to the existing housing elements in the City of Attachment 2 - PLN20180025 Packet Pg. 32 I 6.1.a I ,ti� City of Edmonds Paradise Heights (PLN20180025) 0 188.08 376.2 Feet This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is for reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accurate, WGS_1984_Web-Mercator _Auxiliary _Sphere current, or otherwise reliable. © City of Edmonds Attachment 3 - PI-N20HOOMP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION E Legend -00 r- ArcSDE.GIS.STREET_CENTERLIN 0 — <all other values> y r 1 2 _2) 5; 4 N 9;71;7;8 R L State Highways d <all other values> - - 0 +N+ C 1 E 2 V f� fC 3 0 a m L N N O O O O N Z J o_ c m E z U �a r a Notes 12 units in three buildings at 546 Paradise Lane Packet Pg. 33 1 y 3 546 Paradise Ln ��i3Zbjbr, 1� �aRAM yY •' 1 .y / 1 ► �.� ` - Google Earth '7 © 2018.Google • • i City of Edmonds Paradise Heights (PLN20180025) 'LAP 0 188.08 376.2 Feet This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is for reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accurate, WGS_1984_Web—Mercator _Auxiliary _Sphere current, or otherwise reliable. © City of Edmonds Attachment 4 - PLN20H00MP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION 6.1.a N Legend -0 i= O 0 ReZones L PRD +y, t Plan Overlays ■� ; Activity Center = Corridor Development L N Lj Hi -Rise Node 'ZS IC r t Park L L fC _ d r_ School N RoW O Zoning IRS-6 V RS-8 fC RS-10 3 RS-12 t' O © RSW-12 Q d ❑ RS-20 L. RS-MP N RM-3 Lf) N RM-2.4 C O ■ RM-1.5 00 O RM-EW N Z BD1 J o_ BD2 ; C BD3 d BD4 t V BD5 r Q Notes 12 units in three buildings at 546 Paradise Lane Packet Pg. 35 1 TOE=251.00' 'r .157.07— TOE-254.00' TOP-"0.00' TOE=117 W A' f oz z w FH N B EX: CATCH BASIN TYPE 1 RN-2i3.46 ;2 •. • 4 le _ -17 Q t z ! Btll47flsfi *Ai y g' !�2.air l� ' ~ PROI'OS- '4 f1 fT ._.. -- ? is ie...... I SliliU I {�PFf i, x.R• 5 256 �i y. ;.....,.. I PROPOSE erorrerCEtl kU 3 ! �� slob=1i aa4' zoea, ' Bi1�L1]ING.C1 _ 21 I 14 j P.R&OSEO 4 UNIT . I I j I gy i _ 2 t 13 1 €� - ' 29 OD' • 5 vla6 = 262.44,-�-1Y= r... _. Np I I 22.00'-- IV essgts , F 5' R LINE KEY - - -EXISTING STfl6CTU ----- EXISTING GRADE PROPOSED GRADE - - •ROOF OVERHANG ...... FIST FLOOR LINE INCLUDING DECKS PEDESTRIAN PATHWAY a�R �•. f1P y '0 \ TOE =26840r- 66 00' Sg8 34 iar cov>:RAGe 54X RLO A = 4,pUp.SO SQ. FT. 54X BLD B = 4,367.25 SQ, FT. S4X BLD C = 3,957.40 SQ Fr. TOTAL SQ FT. = 12,44L90 SQ FT - LOT COVERAGE = 12,441.90/30.01129 SQ.FT, = 41% IMPERVIOUS BUILDING (W/ EAVES) = 13.877.63 SQ. FT. DRIVEWAY = 10.197.29 SQ FT. TOTAL = 24,074.92 SQ. FT, PARKING REOUIRE61fNT5 (4) 2 BED = 1.8X4 = 7.20 [81 3 BED xlf8 - S6 54X 8 PARADISE ACYUA REQ, . 24 SPOTS 265.95' ACTVAL - 24 SPOTS 8, 264.75" A. 25 PARAD15f C- 26E:10' A. 253.80'-286.95' R. 26 5.95• RVE GRADE - 260.43' G 266.85" D. 264.30' + 264,55 14 -264.43 AVE GRADE = 263.52' 54X C PARADISE A. 265-40' R 264.20'+264 18' = 264 19' C. 269.25' D. 268.20' AVE GRADE = 266.76' PLOT, UTiLITY,� GRAiiN�' PLAN ••! � �'•' a I � �'??'��TT�� ao �g�ajI'r�Ri nei. c SITE , - y�. VICINTY MAP 10826 z ~ N A H r . ^ 1 V J � N O W00 00 _ z 0 N N N V a x 2 O 2. l pfa O •. W Z N DD dl O W Q V U Q N Q O az O �o W u LA OJ J 0 z= O W u0 Z DC =a I d v0 PRINTED: 6/112018 O C �O V N t N i fC a N C N t V fC fC 3 O CL N LO 04 O O 00 0 04 Z a. c t tv a Attachment 5 - PLN20180025 VICINTY MAP - CRITICAL AREAS --I Packet Pg. 36 6.1.a E 1 - f- -1 E � I EASTELEVATTION HEIGHT: 293.52' r� V li] F"I C!) W Ao m f-i 3 ICI z ra_oarz 2n1.s2 A N 0 I -a o C O U 15Y F{.GC7f� z11.41' (j) t am W Z x J N i Giu�as' �................. SEMEN !SLAB; 262.44' O � U V J a •.• to ED U �[ �o w C) u PENTHOUSE: < OC d SU HEIGHT: 293.52' Q w YJ W R a+ Ln to U*) N q; O O °° LL ,J CD N Z 0 J CL 2NO FLOOR: 251.52' Z T~ T d E oW u Z 15T FLOOR: 271.44 • y ' J ...... CgVI)E: 263.52' _ _ •, SEMENI SLAB: 262.44' MS - - Packet Pg. 38 SOUTH ELgrATMV25 I 6.1.a I .i C7 w W . . W Z Q O N O LLI v/ uO u w I� O O LD W r-. Packet Pg. 39 E 0 c 0 U U) t a� 2 a� N L U m L 0 Q 0 R N N O O Go 0 N z J IL d E L V a 6.1.a m................................ OBI WEST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8" =i'-o" v ocurNrn iac. vwi+ HEIGHT: 296.43' z 0 ACTUAL HEIGHT:20.6 F-I W A� _ 3 _ � o 3 E E z z N AO 0 FLOOR: 281.60 a N Ny E ko Z T FLOOR: 271.52' W O Z N Q N = ❑❑ - .. �� A ............... sew W (Y) i N ff^^ U u p �Q 0 ML11 16- r- m 04 N O 1�G 0 U LL O Go-J o J z a r Z = Lu r- cn u Z Q G � Packet Pg. 40 6.1 a ...............ww..rwww.■sww....■r rwr PROPOSED GRA �----- NORTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8" =i'-o" E 1 r-•, IF ill .•'1�1—I�� E 1-I III E 5E: 297.52' S' z 1�1 W A� y o 0 zz � � Mph � �;��s�►c�- wo Z CV J .. W V i 2,44' p Q w ELEVATOR PENTHOUSE: MAX HEIGHT: 296.43' ACTUAL HEIGHT:293,C, 1V1 J W De U J 0 FLOOR: 2,51.60' O w Z = O W o U Z D VE IF FLOM 271.52' L` J .rr.wrs.■�. GGWPFr.°66.A3' -------.- "� ------ BA5EME-1 SLAB: EAST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8" =f-o" Packet Pg. 41 I 6.1.a I NORTH ELEVATION F- W Z J N q) .. < �W LL O J � J 0 H Z2 w U � H 0 Z =3 DZ L EAST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8" =i'-o" Affammem 5 - Packet Pg. 42 A W z W FH Ine �• _ . EX: CATCH BASIN TYPE 1 RIM • H1.11G I - - .:{S 0 121? lI_ B •'PROPOSED r=•i , • y 1 1 i ss ��11�i/•i �6}R� � � �•'�:• .i �. - '• .i • s s 22,00' ENTKANCE #1 ANI' - (• BUILDING`.C} PR..dPOSED 4 Ulf I 6 3 5 sIAb = 262.44' 4 ENTKANCE #2 LINE KEY ---EX ISTING $TRUCTV ------ IXISTING GRADE PROPOSED GRADE — — -ROOF OVERHANG ...... F1ST FLOOR LINE INCLUDING DECKS PEDESTRIAN iPATHWAY i�EXISTING LANDSCAPING #IN HWY ROW PROPERTY .G. _. Al. 0.: t Y _� Trig Viz_ 0 AZELEA: 5 GALLON SEMPERVIRENS/ 0 ITALIAN CYPRUSS: 6-10' AST MERTENSIANA/ MOUNTAIN HEMLOCK: PINUS NIGRA /AUSTRIAN PINE: 6'-12' ACEII CIRCINATUM/VINE MAPLE: 8'-30' CORNU5 KOUSA! KOU5A IIOGHIo00: r_sa GINKO BILOBA TRINCEIFON SENTRY' RS MAIDEN HAIR• 8'-10• VI BURNIUM DAVIDII/ DAVID VI BURNIUM 2 GALLON BTRBEI�6 tERIN. �. ROYAL BVRGAlAT1M1ERRY: 1 GALLON HOSTA: 1 GALLON PHORMIUM TENAX RUBRUM / NEW ZEAIAND FLAX: 5 GALLON RHODADENDRON/'UNIQUE: 24'-30' TE"TA/ fCHOISYA MEXICAN ORANGE: 5 GALLON > PRUNUS LBUROCERASU5/ OTTO LUYAEN: 5 GALLON -VINCA MINOR: 4' POTS/ 24" D.C. LAWN ARCTOSTAPHYLOS UVA-UR51/ KINNIKINNICK: 4' POTS/ 24' O.C. E----1 CISTUS SALVIFODUS / SAGELEAF ROCKROSE: 1 GALLON/24'D.C. I IC IRRIGATION CONTROL PANEL �j 4' CEDAR FENCE with ARBOR NOTE: PLANT SIZE SPACING A OUANTTIES PER ECDC 20 13 015 LIGHTING SCHEDULE ,4 20 WATT MAX LED PORCH LIGHT HEIGHT: 7'-0' STYLE: 7' TEXTURED BLACK WALL IATERN P6087-3130K99DI BY: PROGRESS LIGHTING GARBAGE AND RECYCLE CONTAINERS TO BE LOCATED INSIDE GARAGE AREA FOR EACH UNIT. N >w + __ • Ir16*. -� . \•r �i� � iI F / DTI W� aIrF s VICINTY MAP ■ �I ■ SCALE: 1" = 20'-0" �' ,4 ■ � _ I VG d' 9 oN a�0 546 NN 9 � ■ � � ' .. • 'tit �� <. 10826 60, •• LLI Zp O N 00 OLu k J '—' L Q U Q �Z V O O u) Ln) r Lu u V� O C) z= O Lu uo z� �a O PRINTED: 6/112018 a Attachment 5 - PLN20180025 VICINTY MAP — CRITICAL AREAS Packet Pg. 44 10.00`, G GRADE 1PROPOS�ED GRADE PROPOSED GRADE 10.00, EXISTING GRA PROPOSED RADE PROPOSED GRADE CROSS SECTIQA-A' SCALE: 1° - 20'-0' OSS SECTION B-B' SCALE: 1" = 20'-0" Ln - h w rn rn cD Ln to 00 1- ryi N U! Ln M ♦ M { o o E -- —� -� CD 0-� -A- DRIVEWAY CE TERLI E - 2 FROM CENTER OF BUILDING B TO NW SCALE: 1" = 20'-0" PROPERTY LINE 4* DRIVEWAY CENTERLINE - 3 SCALE: 1" = 20'-0" BETWEEN BUILDING B & BUILDING C W Z J uj a 0 �c a :10 EXISTING W Z J 126 Q oC a. :1-0.0-a Z PROPOSED GRADE J Ln �- lp o rn o (N � o o DRIVEWAY CENTERLINE -1 FROM STREET TO CENTER OF BUILDING B L . WEI L►�\�EL4�icsa 0 0 0 + O R EW Y CENTERLINE -4 Attachment 5 - PLN20180025 SCALE: 1" = 20'-0" BETWEEN BUILDING A & BUILDING B I 6.1.a I O W N •• Z O 00 J a) W H o 0 U aZ O Lno Ln w � OJ U J o� Z = OW U Q Z ZD� `t QC m PRINTED: 6/11/2018 Packet Pg. 45 6.1.a Progress Lighting Wish collection 1-Light outdoor 7 Inch Textured Black LED Wall Lantern REC " - JUN i . pEVELoPOrrr� tr � !VTSR Mick or Tap Image to Zoom In Packet Pg. 46 Specifications N - E E Dimensions 0 c Product Depth (in.) 8.625 Product Length (in.) 8.625 �° Product Height (in.) 10.4375 Product Width (in.) 7 a� x m N Details a Actual Color Temperature (K) 3000 Lumens E23 Color Rendering Index (CRI) 90 plumber of Bulbs Required c Color Temperature Warm White Outdoor Lighting Features Weather Resistant a 3 Exterior Lighting Product Type Outdoor Lanterns Package Quantity � c a m Fixture Color/Finish Black Power Type Hardwired a Fixture Material Aluminum Product Weight (lb.) 4.850121b r N N 0 0 Glass/Lens Type Frosted Returnable 90-day °r° 0 N Z Included Hardware Included Style Transitional a Light Bulb Type Included Integrated LED Watt Equivalence 60 t U �a Warranty / Certifications r a Attachment 6 - PLN20180025 Packet Pg. 47 6.1.a CITY OF EDMONDS 121 51h Avenue North, Edmonds WA 98020 Phone: 425.771.0220 • Fax: 425.771.0221 • Web: www.edmondswa.gov DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT • PLANNING DIVISION April 24, 2018 Mr. Robin W. Michel Michel Design Via email: rwmichel@nwlink.com SUBJECT: NOTICE OF COMPLETENESS FOR DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION LOCATED AT 546 PARADISE LANE, FILE NO. PLN20180025 Dear Mr. Michel: Your land use application for design review of three, four -unit multi -family buildings located at 546 Paradise Lane (File No. PLN20180025) is procedurally complete pursuant to Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) 20.02.002. Please accept this letter as the City's completeness notice in accordance with ECDC 20.02.003. Although it has been determined that the application meets the procedural submission requirements and is therefore complete, additional information may be needed as staff continues with review of the application. Staff will contact you as our review continues if additional information is necessary. I will be the main staff contact for your application. If you have questions at any point during the review process, you may reach me atlen.Machu a edmondswa. oor (425) 771-0220. Sincerely, Development Services Department - Planning Division Jen Mach uga Associate Planner Cc: File No. PLN20180025 Attach meRpgePILR�a180025 Packet Pg. 48 6.1.a Notice of Application and SEPA Determination File Number PLN20180025 NOTICE OF APPLICATION Description of Proposal: Application for design review of a new multi -family development containing three, 4-unit residential buildings for a total of 12 residential units. The existing residence and associated improvements will be removed. General design review applications that trigger SEPA review are Type II1-B decisions, which require a public hearing and decision by the Architectural Design Board (ADB). The site is located within the Multi -Family Residential, RM-2.4, zone. Name of Applicant: Robin Michel on behalf of Paradise Heights HLD, LLC Location: 546 Paradise Lane, Edmonds, WA Tax Parcel Number: 27032500302600 File No.: PLN20180025 Date of Application: March 27, 2018 Date of Notice: May 8, 2018 Requested Permits: General Design Review Required Studies: Geotechnical Report Date of Completeness: April 24, 2018 Other Required Permits: Building Permits Existing Environmental Documents: Critical Areas Checklist and SEPA Environmental Checklist Comments on Proposal Due: May 22, 2018 (Note: Public hearing date is to be determined. Notice of hearing will be issued separately). Any person has the right to comment on this application during the public comment period, receive notice and participate in any hearings, and request a copy of the decision on the application. The City may accept public comments at any time prior to the closing of the record of an open record predecision hearing, if any, or, if no open record predecision hearing is provided, prior to the decision on the project permit. Only parties of record as defined in ECDC 20.07.003 have standing to initiate an administrative appeal. Information on this development application can be viewed or obtained at the City of Edmonds Development Services Department, 121 - 5th Ave. N, Edmonds, WA 98020. Office hours are Mondays, Tuesdays, Thursdays and Fridays from 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., and Wednesdays from 8:00 a.m. to noon or online through the City's website at htt sill ermits.edmonds.wa.usiritizen. Search for permit PLN20180025. City Contact: Jeri Machuga, Associate Planner, (425) 771-0220, 'en.machu gaedmondswa.ggy STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT (SEPA) NOTICE DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Lead Agency: The City of Edmonds is SEPA lead agency for the proposed 12-unit residential development (File No. PLN20180025). SEPA Determination: Notice is hereby given that the City of Edmonds has issued a Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) under WAC 197-11-340 for the above project. Date of Issuance: May 8, 2018 SEPA Appeal Deadline: May 22, 2018 at 4:00 n.m. Appeals must be filed in writing citing the specific reasons for appeal with the required fee to the City of Edmonds Planning Division, 121 — 5th Ave. N, Edmonds, WA 98020. Attachment 7 - PLN20180025 Packet Pg. 49 VICINITY MAP 710 `4 41- 31�1 P9 *I, ?AQ All Q Lwe FA ZIP Ile .1 ily, 6. J: .,w x 9 794 loon r2o SITE WA f r's 7if ral qv '16 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN Attachment 7 - PLN20180025 I Packet Pg. 50 1 6.1.a ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS LIST Attach this notarized declaration to the adjacent property owners list. On my oath, I certify that the names and addresses provided represent all properties located within 300 feet of the subject property. ems=_ Kgnature of Applicant or Applicant's Representative Subscribed and sworn to before me this � day of 01 i III&10 ' Y o: r- r �- �* (17 �'•,� Public in and for the State of Washington �1+ti 01-4_�= +'R t 41'r Of esiding at l�■\liM7 Attachment 7 - PLN20180025 n,, a-4 — WIW l 1 P2 - Adjacent Property Owners List Packet Pg. 51 Page 2 of 2 6.1.a 09 L9'"'I L91fuGAV cane apludwoo ww L9 x ww 9Z 1ew101 ap 8:V,nh43 j L8/09 L9oAaany qj!M opludwoo ,.8/9 Z x „L azis jap 0053-910-000-0100 0053-910-000-0200 0053-910-000-0300 Michael & Terri Pena Colleen Haiber & Mark Martzen Dalasta Sarah Caulfeild 1370 6th Ave S. 1350 6th Ave S. 13316th Ave S. Edmonds, WA 98020 Edmonds, WA 98020 Edmonds, WA 98020 0053-910-000-0400 0053-910-000-0500 0053-910-000-0600 Edward Murphy Jr. Michael Hughes Brian & Lisa Broce 12916th Ave S. 12516th Ave S. 12416th Ave S. Edmonds, WA 98020 Edmonds, WA 98020 Edmonds, WA 98020 0064-650-000-0200 0064-650-000-0300 0064-650-000-0400 E Allan Bodine Daniel Schoening Morning Star 1 LLC S 505 Paradise Ln. 523 Paradise Ln. 537 Paradise Ln. o Edmonds, WA 98020 Edmonds, WA 98020 Edmonds, WA 98020 c U 0064-650-000-0500 0065-690-001-0000 0065-690-001-0100 Janaki Jeyabalan William & Sandra Mezger Peter Manzanares 517 Paradise Ln. 500 Paradise Ln. #100 500 Paradise Ln. #101 Edmonds, WA 98020 Edmonds, WA 98020 w Edmonds, WA 98020 � L 0065-690-001-0200 0065-690-001-0300 0065-690-002-0000 a Sonia Buter Karl Buechmann Eve Kopp = 500 Paradise Ln. #102 500 Paradise Ln. #103 500 Paradise Ln. #200 E E Edmonds, WA 98020 Edmonds, WA 98020 Edmonds, WA 98020 c� 0065-690-002-0100 0065-690-002-0200 0065-690-002-0300 3 Joanne Severson Katherine Wright Eric Nagel 0 0 500 Paradise Ln. #201 500 Paradise Ln. #202 500 Paradise Ln. #203 m Edmonds, WA 98020 Edmonds, WA 98020 Edmonds, WA 98020 r N LO 0065-690-003-0000 0065-690-003-0100 0065-690-003-0200 0 Maureen Watson Barbara Decker William &Elaine Hoppe CO 500 Paradise Ln. #300 500 Paradise Ln. #301 500 Paradise Ln. #302 N Edmonds, WA 98020 Edmonds, WA 98020 Edmonds, WA 98020 z a r 0065-690-003-0300 2703-250-030-2200 2703-250-030-2300 Kim Alan Kranzler Toni Silicio Nicholas & Jillian Wellington 500 Paradise Ln. #303 541 Paradise Ln. 545 Paradise Ln. r Edmonds, WA 98020 Edmonds, WA 98020 Edmonds, WA 98020 Q 2703-250-030-2400 2703-250-030-2500 2703-250-030-2600 Thomas W & Jessica Sutton Takashi & Diane Nasa Paradise Heights Hid LLC 549 Paradise Ln. 557 Paradise Ln. 546 Paradise Ln. Edmonds, WA 98020 Edmonds, WA 98020 Edmonds, WA 98020 2703-250-030-2900 2703-250-030-3000 2703-250-030-3200 Byung & Justine Kim Patrick Reedy Patrick Reedy 10826 Kulshan Rd. Edmonds, WA 98020 541 Edmonds Way Woodway, WA 98020 Attachment 7 - PLN20180025 Edmonds WA 98020 Packet Pg. 52 091E i.9�/+a9AV aaAe aIgi}sdwoo ww L9 x ww 9Z Iewao; ap a- ,,d L9/0915SAJaAV gJIM OpIlRdw03 „9/9 Z x „ G azis lagel 2703-250-030-3300 2703-250-030-3400 Owen & Jacqueline Owens Daralee Owens 556 Paradise Ln. 560 Paradise Ln. Edmonds, WA 98020 Edmonds, WA 98020 2703-250-030-8100 2703-250-030-8300 Owen L Owens 401k Trust Alexander & Theresa Molnar Trust 601 Edmonds Way 540 Edmonds Way Edmonds, WA 98020 Edmonds, WA 98020 2703-250-031-3100 2703-250-031-5400 Larry & Patricia Summerville Marjorie Edwards 1336 6th Ave S. 1240 6th Ave S. Edmonds, WA 98020 Edmonds, WA 98020 i hll3 a � 2703-250-030-7300 1st Security Bank 620 Edmonds Way Edmonds, WA 98020 2703-250-030-8400 Molnar Building LLC 550 Edmonds Way Edmonds, WA 98020 2703-250-031-5800 Frank & Kateri Snow 1250 6th Ave S. Edmonds, WA 98020 Attachment 7 - PLN20180025 Packet Pg. 53 6.1.a FILE NO.: PLN20180025 APPLICANT: Paradise Heights DECLARATION OF MAILING NOTICE OF APPLICATION On the 8 day of May, 2018, the attached Notice of Application was mailed by the City to property owners within 300 feet of the property that is the subject of the above -referenced application. I. Denise Nelson, hereby declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that the foregoing is true and correct this 8 day of May, 2018 at Edmonds, Washington. 4 Signed: Attachment 7 - PLN20180025 {BFP747887.DOC;1\00006.900000\ } Packet Pg. 54 6.1.a FILE NO.: PLN20180025 APPLICANT: PARADISE HEIGHTS DECLARATION OF POSTING NOTICE OF APPLICATION & SEPA DETERMINATION On the 8 day of May, 2018 the attached Notice of Application & SEPA Determination was posted as prescribed by Ordinance and in any event where applicable on or near the subject property. I, Jennifer Machuga hereby declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that the foregoing is true and correct this 8 day of March, 2018, at Edmonds, Washington. Signed: {BFP747892.DOC;1\00006.900000\ } Attachment 7 - PLN20180025 Packet Pg. 55 6.1.a Everett Daily Herald Affidavit of Publication State of Washington } County of Snohomish } ss Dicy Sheppard being first duly sworn, upon oath deposes and says: that he/she is the legal representative of the Everett Daily Herald a daily newspaper. The said newspaper is a legal newspaper by order of the superior court in the county in which it is published and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of the first publication of the Notice hereinafter referred to, published in the English language continually as a daily newspaper in Snohomish County, Washington and is and always has been printed in whole or part in the Everett Daily Herald and is of general circulation in said County, and is a legal newspaper, in accordance with the Chapter 99 of the Laws of 1921, as amended by Chapter 213, Laws of 1941, and approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of Snohomish County, State of Washington, by order dated June 16, 1941, and that the annexed is a true copy of EDH807157 PLN20180025 as it was published in the regular and entire issue of said paper and not as a supplement form thereof for a period of 1 issue(s), such publication commencing on 05/08/2018 and ending on 05/08/2018 and that said newspaper was regularly distributed to its subscribers during all of said period. The amount of the fee fo such publication is $99.76. Subscribed and sworn before me on this —2EL111— day of ZI &. e" IZ Notary Public in and for the State of Washington. City of Edmonds - LEGAL ADS 114101416 JEN MACHUGA ' v� YPu � � ►AAA. _ Attachment 7 - PLN20180025 Packet Pg. 56 6.1.a Classified Proof CITY OF EDMONDS Notice of AppAcRtlarl and SEPA Qelerminatlon - Frle Number PLN20180025 NOTICE OF APPLICATION Description of Pro 1: Appticallon for design review of a new mVlti-fa�mlty 0ve opirrient containing Three, a-urFll residential Widings far a total of 12 re"rittal Ura(& The eaisbng residence and associated Improvemante will be 18rmved. General dealgn ravlew applications that Irlgger SEPA review are Type I0-S dpeWons. which regWre a publio hewing and decision by the ArchltriclurW 00ergn Soard,ADS). The site 17 Ie"fried wi a Itwr Mutff-Family Raiiidehtlal, RM-2.4, zone. Name of Aanacanl• Robin Michel on behalf of Paradise Heights T-I CG-CCV` KN540Luca Paradtsa t.ano, Edmonds, WA az arcal N mbar= 270325110702800 File No : PLN20180025 pats Aclz c Min, March 27, 2018 Data o_f teoemmalaLm ,, April 24, 2018 ale a Not"- May 8, 2018 i�Pnrm1 ts• Germral l7eafr Rev ew n r O Ir Fermis' eulldir- arRtita ulfe u as eater nnlCSl Repan Etis�Envimnmef�l_Docrml ant&when[&_ Cnllcal Areas Checklist and rw Winch c lisl Camme011 on gpo4al_ ue1 UW 22. 2018 tNote: Public Hearing Cafe IS t0 11e dalesmlrred. Nalfce or hearing will be Issued separately). Any person has the right to comment on this applIcallon during the plalltc romment paned, racelve rodeo and parWpole In tiny hearings, and request a copy of too decision on the applieafieu. The City may accept publk eammenls at any Ihne prim to the closing of the record or an open record predeclalon hearing, If any, or, if no open record prddoclson hearing Is provkled, prior to the decision on Iho project permll. 4nty partroa o record as defined in EC DC 20.07.003 have slanding to Initiate an admmiatratka appeal. Information on this dava!4pWrA appllcatlOn Can he Vteived or obtalned at the city of Edmonds Development Services oepartmanl, 121 - 5Ih Ave. N. Edmonds. WA 98020. Odka hours are Maydays, Tuesdays, Thursdays and Fridrtys kont 8.0a a.m. to 4:�0 p.m., and woefnasdays from 8:00 am. to noon or online lhrough the Cily'a waf>xtle at hiala7lperm11li'd n .w .N9kni Sa�rchforpermtlALN201sOD25 Cis CorMagY, Jea µachuga, Asaaclata Planner, (425) 771-0220, le nmachuna BLedmondSwa,� �TiAFENTAL POLICY ACT (SEPA) NOTICE DET ERMI NATION OF NON SIGN IFICAN CE Lea,_A en • The City of Edmonds Is SEPA lead agencyla for the propose 12ur111 residential develapmerll [ElNO. FLN20t80026}. SEPA ❑dt rminalIan, NeBee in berets given That iris City of dmanda Ilea asued a e - Ilon ens[ c DN undar WAC 197.11-340 r the a ova pia ecl Date or I sconce: May S. 2010 A A 1f 4 dflna- MR 22 2018 al_A-Qg n m. Appnats must led inwn ng c II1g 1 e specific reasons for appem with trio required foo to Iho Cityof Edmonds Planning Division. 121 . 51h Ave. N. Edmonds. WA 98020. Published: May 8,2018, F-OHBO7157 Q Proofed by Sheppard, Dicy, 05/08/2018 08:17:45 am Attachment 7 - PLN20180025 Page: 2 Packet Pg. 57 6.1.a pr E0hf CITY OF EDMONDS NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Application for design review of a new multi -family development containing three, 4-unit residential buildings for a total of 12 residential units. An existing residence and associated improvements will be removed. General design review applications that require SEPA review are Type 111-B decisions, which require a public hearing and decision by the Architectural Design Board (ADB). The site is located within the Multiple Residential (RM-2.4) zone. PROJECT LOCATION: 546 Paradise Lane, Edmonds (Tax ID #: 27032500302600) NAME OF APPLICANT: Paradise Heights HLD, LLC (rep. Rob Michel) FILE NO.: PLN20180025 DATE OF APPLICATION: March 27, 2018 DATE OF COMPLETENESS: April 24, 2018 DATE OF NOTICE: July 18, 2018 PUBLIC HEARING INFORMATION: A public hearing will be held by the Architectural Design Board on August 1, 2018 at 7 p.m. in the Council Chambers located at 250-5th Avenue North, Edmonds, WA 98020. Any person has the right to comment on this application during public comment period, receive notice and participate in any hearings, and request a copy of the decision on the application. The City may accept public comments at any time prior to the closing of the record of an open record predecision hearing, if any, or, if no open record predecision hearing is provided, prior to the decision on the project permit. Only parties of record as defined in ECDC 20.07.003 have standing to initiate an appeal. Information on this development application can be viewed or obtained at the City of Edmonds Development Services Department, 121 5th Ave North, Edmonds, WA 98020 between the hours of 8:00 A.M. and 4:30 P.M. Monday — Friday (8:30 A.M. to 12:00 P.M. only on Wednesdays) or online through the City's website at https:Hpermits.edmonds.wa.us/citizen. Search for permit PLN20180025. CITY CONTACT: Mike Clugston, AICP, Senior Planner michael.clugston@edmondswa.izov 425-771-0220 x 1330 Attachment 7 - PLN20180025 Packet Pg. 58 6.1.a VICINITY MAP ;,� r tr_S .i-• 7hT �ryY 4P•7� 'r 1.' I.. �, L q �' 57ao te4' r iTi .� I ? o : '•^ ' Y .. „� i � r� ''� "� � p.17%J6€f7/1 94�.nY7yi' ., 3 y 8 v '"1f .:•: .w l2Sii a�alr' a rc j t Y x uzv 04 roe r ]t. no `9 a o _ ]0 - ' wozo nK, u Y k rsa :za, ir, u.,," a 41 SITE Is 0 r,::Gt b: r.: � ! � 6 � � � ir. GiG � ��} • r l l 71 } T; t �� 3S7 .xlcihAir Sw ini•: yrt. ,.. •6i.Q6' 1 r PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN (revised) .aiana �•' 37 6 Tai � .� t4 $tJl1.L7�iCi `�1 k$ iYkso o 'PROPOSED 4 Y VI7 s,leb+3H3.6x' t � v� L� i 9 ' r. PROPOSED 4UNIT l41b �� 1A4' 14 13 ]i c!`S E2 ••�� I 10 .. _ =bx ` f� PRO E0 OPOT 2�a 5 A �t 4f ■frt0+ Wit V 4 i 9A TOP. ?6a.00' �40''75-t TOE .266.W Attachment 7 - PLN20180025 Packet Pg. 59 6.1.a FILE NO.: PLN20180025 APPLICANT: PARADISE HEIGHTS DECLARATION OF POSTING NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING On the 18th day of July, 2018, the attached Notice of Public Hearing was posted as prescribed by Ordinance and in any event where applicable on or near the subject property. I, Mike Clugston, hereby declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that the foregoing is true and correct this 181h day of July, 2018, at Edmonds, Washington. Signed: j��n: - {BFP747892.DOC;1\00006.900000\ } Attachment 7 - PLN20180025 Packet Pg. 60 6.1.a FILE NO.: PLN20180025 APPLICANT: Paradise Heights HLD, LLC DECLARATION OF MAILING NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING On the 17 day of July, 2018, the attached Notice of Public Hearing was mailed by the City to property owners within 300 feet of the property that is the subject of the above -referenced application. I, Diane Cunningham, hereby declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that the foregoing is true and correct this 17 day of July, 2018 at Edmonds, Washington. Signed: Attachment 7 - PLN20180025 Packet Pg. 61 6.1.a Classified Proof CITY OF EOr6OND$ NOTICE OFPl18LICHPARINO PROJECT DESCRIPTION:: ApPlIcatlon for deslpn review of a few muld.fandly dovolopmunt containing Wee. 4-011 realdentVal bullding3 for a total of 12 residential units. An a%lsling msidence and associaied improvements will be removed. Oofieral design revlex Sppf"Fona that roqulry SEPA rovJew are Typo Ih-EI doe Lvorla, which require a 0b% hearing and decision by try! A[ChllactLrel Deal gn 6Ma rd rAD8). The Wle Is located within the Mule Pig Reaide rilal 4R M•7.4, iane- PROJECT LOCATION: 648 Paratkeo Lane. Edmonds (TaxiD #:270325003OW00) NAME OF APPLICANT: Paradise Heights HLD, LLC RRon M is holy FIO.: PLN20100025 DATE OF APPLICATION: March 27, 2010 DATE OF COMPLETENESS' AIxA 24. 2018 DATE OF NOTICE: Ju 18, 2i016 PUBLIC HEARING IN ORMATION: A public hoofing will be held by Shp Archllechiral Deslgn Board en Au uat 1, 2019 a1 7 p.m. In the Council Cilembors located at 250.5Ih Avenue North, Edmond$, WA 98020, Any person hoe the fight 10 comment on this application during public common[ period, receive nonce and participate in any hearings, and request a copy Of Ile decision Mn the appllcallon, The CIV may 5ccopi public comments al any it" prior to the closing of the record or an open record prodeNaign hearing, if any, or. If no open record pradedsion hearing is Provided, prior to the dedsion on the project permh- Only p2rI. Ms 0 feCord as defiled in ECDC 20,07.903 have Stending to 101"1e an appeal Information on ihhi devolopmurif opplicatlon can be viewed or obtained at the City or Edmonds Devalopment services Deparimeol, 121 5It Ave North, Edmonds. WA 88020 between the hours of 8:00 A.M. and 4,30 P,M. Monday - Friday (8:30 A.M. to 12:00 P.M. Only on wednasdays] or dnilne through the City's webette at hkIp&Y1OermIks.edmohds wa. 2E c n Search for permit PLN20180025. CITY CONTACT: Mike Cwgstort, AICP. Senior Planner MIeh2el.clpuuppalo edmondswa.gov 425 771.0230If1 30 Published: July 18. 2018- EOMS17333 E 3 E 0 C 0 U N t N to R d C N t V ft0 tt3 3 1` 0 CL m L to r1) N O O O r O N Z J it r C d E t U R r a Proofed by Sheppard, Dicy, 07/18/2018 08:30:01 am Attachment 7 - PLN20180025 Packet Pg. 62 6.1.a Everett Daily Herald Affidavit of Publication State of Washington } County of Snohomish } ss Dicy Sheppard being first duly sworn, upon oath deposes and says: that he/she is the legal representative of the Everett Daily Herald a daily newspaper. The said newspaper is a legal newspaper by order of the superior court in the county in which it is published and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of the first publication of the Notice hereinafter referred to, published in the English language continually as a daily newspaper in Snohomish County, Washington and is and always has been printed in whole or part in the Everett Daily Herald and is of general circulation in said County, and is a legal newspaper, in accordance with the Chapter 99 of the Laws of 1921, as amended by Chapter 213, Laws of 1941, and approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of Snohomish County, State of Washington, by order dated June 16, 1941, and that the annexed is a true copy of EDH817333 PLN20180025 as it was published in the regular and entire issue of said paper and not as a supplement form thereof for a period of 1 issue(s), such publication commencing on 07/18/2018 and ending on 07/18/2018 and that said newspaper was regularly distributed to its subscribers during all of said period. The amount of the fe for such publication is Subscribed and sworn b fore me on this day of Not ublic in and for the State of Washington. City of Edmonds - LEGAL ADS 114101416 DIANE CUNNINGHAM Linda F°h 114x Notary Public State of Washinplon MYApMntmaM FKO" fl8Yl9±Llj Attachment 7 - PLN20180025 Packet Pg. 63 6.1.a O,. FDA, CITY OF EDMONDS �•a� t 9q 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH, EDMONDS, WA 98020 (425) 771-0220 WAC 197-11-970 Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Description of proposal: File No. PLN20180025. The proposal is for a new multi -family residential development containing three, 4-unit residential buildings for a total of 12 residential units. The existing single-family residence and associated improvements will be removed. The proposal includes approximately 2,600 cubic yards of cut and fill. The site is located within the Multi -Family Residential, RM- 2.4, zone. Proponent: Robin Michel on behalf of Paradise Heights HLD, LLC Location of proposal, including street address if any: 546 Paradise Lane, Edmonds, WA Tax Parcel Number 27032500302600 Lead agency: City of Edmonds The lead agency has determined that the requirements for environmental analysis and protection have been adequately addressed in the development regulations and comprehensive plan adopted under chapter 36.70A RCW, and in other applicable local, state, or federal laws or rules, as provided by RCW 43.21C.240 and WAC 197-11-158 and/or mitigating measures have been applied that ensure no significant adverse impacts will be created. An environmental impact statement is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. XX There is no comment period for this DNS. This DNS is issued under 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date below. Comments must be submitted by _L�!A Project Planner: Jen Machuga, Associate Planner Responsible Official: Rob Chave, Planning Manager Contact Information: City of Edmonds 1 121 5th Avenue North, Edmonds WA 98020 1 425-771-0220 r 1 Date: 5 / 3,� Signature: XX You may appeal this determination to Robert Chave, Planning Manager, at 121 5th Avenue North, Edmonds, WA 98020, by filing a written appeal citing the specific reasons for the appeal with the required appeal fee, adjacent property owners list and notarized affidavit form no later than May 22 2018 You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact Rob Chave to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. XX Posted on May 8, 2018 , at the Edmonds Public Library and Edmonds Public Safety Building. Published in the Everett Herald. Emailed to the Department of Ecology SEPA Center (SEPAunit ec .wa. ov). Mailed to property owners within 300 feet of the site. XX Distribute to "Checked" Agencies below. The SEPA Checklist, project plans, location map, and DNS are available at https://perm[ts.edmonds.wa.us/citizen. Search for file number PLN20180025. These materials are also available for viewing at the Planning Division — located on the second floor of City Hall: 121 51h Avenue North, Edmonds WA 98020. Page 1 of 2 SEPA DNS Attachment 8 - PLN20180025 5/4/18 SEPA Packet Pg. 64 6.1.a Notice mailed and/or e-mailed to the following: XX Environmental Review Section Department of Ecology P.O. Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 Email: SEPAunitOecy.wa gov XX COMCAST Outside Plant Engineer, North Region 1525 75th St. SW Ste 200 Everett, WA 98203 XX Washington State Dept. of Transportation Attn: Ramin Pazooki SnoKing Developer Services, MS 221 15700 Dayton Ave. N. PO Box 330310 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 XX Tulalip Tribal Council 6700 Totem Beach Road Marysville, WA 98270 XX Snohomish County Fire District No. 1 Headquarters Station No. 1 Attn.: Director of Fire Services 12310 Meridian Avenue South Everett, WA 98208-5764 XX Town of Woodway Attn.: Clerk -Treasurer 23920 113th Place West Woodway, WA 98020 XX Edmonds School District No. 15 20420 68th Avenue West Lynnwood, WA 98036-7400 Attachments pc: File No. PLN20180025 SEPA Notebook XX Community Transit Attn.: Kate Tourtellot 7100 Hardeson Road Everett, WA 98203 XX Olympic View Water & Sewer District 8128 228th St. SW Edmonds, WA 98026 XX Department of Archaeology & Historic Preservation PO Box 48343 Olympia, WA 98504-8343 XX Puget Sound Energy Attn: David Matulich PO Box 97034, M/S BOT-1 G Bellevue, WA 98009-9734 david. matulichg i)se.com XX M. L. Wicklund Snohomish Co. PUD PO Box 1107 Everett, WA 98206-1107 XX Kojo Fordjour Department of Ferries Environmental Manager 2901 3rd Ave., Suite 500 Seattle, WA 98121-3014 XX John Rettenmier Paradise Heights HLD, LLC 24144 E. Greystone Lane Woodway, WA 98020 XX Robin W. Michel Michel Design PO Box 1215 Lynnwood, WA 98046 Pagge 2 of 2 SEPADNS Attachment 8 - PLN20180025 5/4/18 SEPA Packet Pg. 65 6.1.a #P71 CITY OF EDMOND S ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Use of checklist for nonproject proposals: For nonproject proposals complete this checklist and the supplemental sheet for nonproject actions (Part D). the lead agency may exclude any question for the environmental elements (Part 13) which they determine do not contribute meaningfully to the analysis of the proposed nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Paradise Lane 12 Unit 2. Name of applicant: John Rettenmier for Paradise Heights HLD, LLC, Michel Design, Agent 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: John Rertenonier 24144 E. Greystone Lane. Wood",ay, WA 98020 42_5-750-5965 Contact Person: Robin Michel 7305 Soundview Drive Edmonds, WA _98026. 206-930-2445 4. Date checklist prepared: March 23, 2018 5. Agency requesting checklist: Cittof Edmonds Revised on 9116116 PAtNDT9?tB�9 PRA5doc Packet Pg. 66 6.1.a 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Construction start Fall2018 (STAFF COMMENTS) _ 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this N E proposal? If yes, explain. E No p c 0 U _ W - t (STAFF COMMENTS) N _ a� N R L Qr 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Februa 24 2004 W.4 State Department of EcolQ& Mitigated Determination o -Nonsi ni icance — 12 unit condo _ tk iember 11 2007 WA 5trite Deparl�rrenr vj EcoloD} 1 oiguted Delernrrnult_a r oLNvnsignd ►cancee — 3)unil bids CRA 2004-14 Waiver ran critical areas report requirements 9. (STAFF COMMENTS) _ �aLe��err.,'I ... zZeco�P6__ �1. o 10 [ SSCAcd-to sw-� c�v[ 7. i %n, S :.� .•�7 , •J "+ ,�i' 000 Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals • directly affecting N the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. Z J None _ _ - _ a t+ m � E v _-AL Q (STAFF COMMENTS) r UL ty r th a Revised on 9119116 PaMWsV n2A9b'cbP r-N&P A-doc Packet Pg. 67 6.1.a 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. City of Edmonds ADB, Engineering; Drainage. and building. permit approvals (STAFF COMMENTS) �o ��To__rJ_3-I`,�C�7g�a► r. 5�..�c�n _ls�►.c(+� ram; l � 1�.��1� ^_i��.S 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You M do not need to repeat those answers on this page. r- E Demolish existing single family house with detached garage. Construct 3 new buildings each containing four dwelling units. Units rgPg:in - from 1600 s ft to 2000 s ft in size. Each V Building to_hve-enclosed parking for each unit located at the ground floor. y z New curb, gutter and sidewalk install alongstreet et frontage. LM 2 Extensive landscaping through out the site. L R L Ri IL (STAFF COMMENTS) 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. Address: 546 Paradise Lane, Edmonds, WA 98020 The site lies to the east of H WY 104 Edmonds Ways near the exit to the Edmonds Ferry Section 25SW Qt Township 27, Ramie 3E Legal ❑escri tp Lor : SEC 25 TWP 27 RGE 031RT-79) BEG SE COR SW1/4 NW1/4 SW1/4 TH W 15FT TH N TO S LN CO RD TH NWLY ALG CO RD 168.19FT TPB TH S PLT E LN SW1/4 NW1/4 SW1/4 TO PT 150FT N OF S LN SD SUB TH N88*32 OOW 260.05FT M/LTO N LN ST RD 1 W TH N01*00 OOE TO S LN CO RD TH SELY ALG SD LN TPB LESS S/HY (STAFF COMMENTS)""raic Revised on 9119116 Pc AVuwTWs-hRWMM04doc Packet Pg. 68 6.1.a TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Fla ro in illy, steep slopes, mountainous, other: N E 7 (STAFF COMMENTS) (( o ncu-�1,- �+ •�� V idr- Cl��7r� Art y. �t.�� YTCt� �3:40 b. WCat is the steepest Slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? '--\d a3.F FD Small section 900 sq ft at the NW corner of the site at about 40% slope. Majority of site 29 000 s fft at about y =a 2% slope. �a a C. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, and muck)? if you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any agricultural land of long term commercial significance and whether the proposal results in removing any of these soils. Mapping shows it to be Everett gravelly sanoy loam series. (STAFF COMMENTS): d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. None. (STAFF COMMENTS) Revised on 9119116 Pc it ��SL�lp e�9Q .doe Packet Pg. 69 6.1.a e. Describe the purpose, type, total area and approximate quantities and total affected area of any filling, excavation, and grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Buildings: 12,500 sg ft area driveways at 10,100 sq ftarea and a total area of approximately 22,600 sq ft. Grading: aver rage of approximately 3 feet in depth for a total of 2,600 cubic yards of cut and fi I I. (STAFF COMMENTS) f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. N Temporary gradin cg ould create a potential for some soil erosion. A erosion control plan will be re ared b a Licensed engineer and agprayed by the City of Edmonds and implemented to curtail any erosion potential._ E 0 - c (STAFF COMMENTS) _ V N t g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for 2 example, asphalt or buildings)? y =a Buildin.Qs: 42% and driveways: 33% L �a a d (STAFF COMMENTS) t U 0 0 h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: BMPs for temporary erosion control and drainage facilities will implemented during construction with final drainage facilities installed alon& with permanent landscaping. — 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, and industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? if any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Minimal amounts of dust and vehicle exhaust during dry months. (STAFF COMMENTS) Revised on 9119116 PaAAWmh tvV WEPl9N21M(W025doc Packet Pg. 70 6.1.a b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may effect your proposal? If so, generally describe. None (STAFF COMMENTS) C. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to the, if any: BMPs for construction activity include watering if dust production is detected N E (STAFF COMMENTS)�,`c,�,�],��,_ro_ TT o 3. WATER a� 2 a� a. Surface: y =a (1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, and wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If a appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. N c None - — E t 3 (STAFF COMMENTS) 0 a M (2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. NA - (STAFF COMMENTS)_ (3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of till material. NA _ (STAFF COMMENTS) _ Revised on 9119116 Pdi #d€ Il�'rLl�N h1 ��%5doc Packet Pg. 71 6.1.a (4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. None (STAFF COMMENTS) N E .E (5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. E 0 No - c 0 U N t a� 2 (STAFF COMMENTS) =a L Q. (6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the 4) type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. E U None M (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Ground: a (1) Will ground water be withdrawn from a well for drinking water or other purposes? If so, give a ; general description of the well, proposed uses and approximate quantities withdrawn from the well i Will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate s quantities if known. c No e (STAFF COMMENTS) __ Revised on 9119116 Pa ,*T@ 4 ;EW42-RJ -5Voc Packet Pg. 72 6.1.a C. (2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None (STAFF COMMENTS) N E 7 E O Water Runoff (including storm water): c V (1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any w (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If 1M so, describe. 2 The principal source of water runoff will generated by rainwater and snow melt. Engineered drainage pjam y will include storm water collection and dispersion to meet current DOE requirements. �a a (STAFF COMMENTS) (2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. Engineered drainage plans meetine City of Edmonds Aeec uirements will include bio filtration measures to _ prevent waste materials to enter ground or surfaces waters as designed. _ (STAFF COMMENTS)_ -- (3) Does the proposal alter or otherwise affect drainage patterns in the vicinity of the site? If so, describe. No - (STAFF COMMENTS) Revised on 9119116 PaA#diai niA1tt4$9L 4ftV 6U26doc Packet Pg. 73 6.1.a d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, runoff water, and drainage pattern impacts, if any: Temporary measures will implemented during construction to control runoff and water quality. Completed project will include bio filtration measures. (STAFFCOMMENTS) �'7� : �+�q. +rrar Ga�.�r.��'a�+ ��► _L4Yi�� '�� N 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: X deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other: X evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other: X shrubs X _ grass pasture crop or grain Orchards, vineyards or other permanent crops wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other: water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other: other types of vegetation: (STAFF COMMENTS) b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Most shrubs and trees will be removed and new landscapipg installed. (STAFF COMMENTS) Revised on 9119116 PARRVMOSA" NAMPdoc Packet Pg. 74 6.1.a C. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. (STAFF COMMENTS) N E .E E 0 d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other materials to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, or - if any: V N Landscape plans will be submitted meeting City of Edmonds landscape requirements that will include use of native plants. 2 a� N R L (STAFF COMMENTS) — a e. List all noxious weeds and invasive species known to be on or near the site. Black berry plants to be removed. _ (STAFF COMMENTS) 5. Animals A. List any birds and other animals that have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site. Examples include: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, othe . small typical native birds mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, of squirre fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, of :none (STAFF COMMENTS) Revised on 9119116 Packet Pg. 75 6.1.a b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None (STAFF COMMENTS) C. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Pacific Flyway _ (STAFF COMMENTS) d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: Tree preservation and new landscaping _ (STAFF COMMENTS)._ e. List any invasive animal species known to be on or near the site. None (STAFF COMMENTS) _ 6. Energy and Natural Resources Revised on 9119116 c c a c c -- c . _ s c l Packet Pg. 76 e 6.1.a a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Natural gas will be used for cooking, cleaning and heatin Electrical for elevators, lighting and security (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No (STAFF COMMENTS) c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Enemy conserving technicEues will be implemented in the construction. All structures will conform to the IBC provisions for efficiency. Solar cells will be an option (STAFF COMMENTS)! - 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so describe. None Revised on 9119116 (STAFF COMMENTS) Pc�"i ��JYt�SL��;�e�$Q4r`�1?doc Packet Pg. 77 6.1.a (1) Describe any known or possible contamination at the site from present or past uses. None (STAFF COM N E 7 C E (2) Describe existing hazardous chemicals/conditions that might affect project development and design. -0a This includes underground hazardous liquid and gas transmission pipelines located within the o project area and in the vicinity. V N None IM a� N R L (STAFF COMMENTS) a (3) Describe any toxic or hazardous chemicals that might be stored, used, or produced during the project's development or constructions, or at any time during the operating life of the project. None (STAFF COMMENTS) (4) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None (STAFF COMMENTS) (5) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: The proposal will meet all City of Edmonds and District i provisions for fire and life safety._ Revised on 9119116 PaMW0T,9TAEP"PJP@99AoC Packet Pg. 78 6.1.a (STAFF COMMENTS) _ b. Noise N (1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, E operation, other)? Traffic 0 _ c 0 0 0 t _ _m (STAFF COMMENTS)_ �f�te —J ��en 3t v Sly' �`/ /(�,•�-, • �S 2 a� 11++ A R L (2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hour's noise d would come from the site. t Temporary residential construction noise - minimal ,00, 0 3 0 a m L (STAFF COMMENTS) _ N 0 0 . m (3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Construction Activity will be limited to the City of Edmonds requirements for noise curtailment. _ (STAFF CO Revised on 9119116 Packet Pg. 79 6.1.a 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Will the proposal affect current land uses on nearby or adjacent properties? If so, describe. Current use is single family residential. North is condominium units. East is residential single family _ South is residential single famil West is HWY 104 (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Has the project site been used as working farmlands or working forest lands? If so, describe. How much agricultural or forest land of long-term commercial significance will be converted to other uses as a result of the proposal, if any? If resource lands have not been designated, how many acres in farmland or forest land tax status will be converted to nonfarm or nonforest use? No (STAFF COMMENTS (1) Will the proposal affect or be affected by surrounding working farm or forest land normal business operations, such as oversize equipment access, the application of pesticides, tilling, and harvesting? If so, how: XT_ (STAFF COMMENTS) C. Describe any structures on the site. Single family residence and detached garage. Revised on 9119116 PaAW#TPM �EFVM iQA?.�Ioc Packet Pg. 80 6.1.a d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? Single family residence and detached garage. (STAFF COMMENTS) C. What is the current zoning classification of the site? RM 2.4 0 c — 0 t� N (STAFF COMMENTS) M 2 a� N R L f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? d Multi -Family Medium Density N _ _ c d E t --- 0 3 (STAFF COMMENTS) 0 a g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master plan designation of the site? NA (STAFF COMMENTS) _ h. Has any part of the site been classified critical area by the city? If so, specify. No (STAFF COMMENTS) C-c- �_k;,, %A 1—e-z - ��,—,,•,; .�-��, _�E1I � �r;_�� Revised on 9119116 PaMtft r V,00fNeSi "C%k8RR 4doc Packet Pg. 81 6.1.a i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? (STAFF COMMENTS) j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? 3 (STAFF COMMENTS) E T 0 c 0 U U) t a� 2 a� N k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: L This project will increase the amount of housing units for the City of Edmonds si rn (STAFF COMMEN a s s 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if ; any: Meeting requirements of the City of Edmonds for multi -Family housin _dg evelopment. — s u c c (STAFF COMMENTS)j; M. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts to agricultural and forest lands of long-term commercial significance, if any: (STAFF COMMENTS) -- Revised on 9119116 ParAtdd-iAW88EPIIK2&t I?doc Packet Pg. 82 6.1.a 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. 12 units for middle income (STAFF COMMENTS) N E C - E O b. Approximately how many units, if any would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income c housing. C) N One unit of middle income z a� a� N (STAFF COMMENTS)•_ �a a C. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: This nroiect will increase the amount of housine units for the Citv of Edmo (STAFF COMMENTS) 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principle exterior building material(s) proposed? 30 feet (STAFF COMMENTS) Revised on 9119116 PatAkVaQhff $ SE tM10W.5(oc Packet Pg. 83 6.1.a b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None (STAFF COMMENTS) C. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Meet City of Edmonds bulk requirements and ADB approval (STAFF COM 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Minimal glare from residential lighting at nib (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No (STAFF COMMENTS) C. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None (STAFF COMMENTS) Revised on 9119116 Pa ftf S'EPJ4WM i ,rz1oc Packet Pg. 84 6.1.a d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: All building lighting will be shielded and/or directed toward the interior of the site. (STAFF COMMENTS). 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? There are parks within walking distance. _ (STAFF COMME b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreation uses? If so, describe. No (STAFF COMMENTS) C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: A per unit Park fee will be paid to the City of Edmonds for park building and maintenance_ (STAFIF COMMENTS) Remised on 9119116 PaAf1ftohrB006WP- Q&8h02Woc Packet Pg. 85 6.1.a 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any buildings, structures, or sites located on or near the site that are over 45 years old listed in, or eligible for listing in national, state, or local preservation registers? if so, specifically describe. No (STAFFCOMMENTS) ''1� 3r n�Vcl�-^ a `av�ke13 ,.� •a1L-,� �'r,er� � in r L! V1teL--C77I Shy �7(L- r i'f1 LCi_4ClC].7 �t_ •v1•�CY-C'2.� i o b. Are there any landmarks, features, or other evidence of Indian or historic use or occupation? This may o include human burials or old cemeteries. Are there any material evidence, artifacts, or areas of cultural U importance on or near the site? Please list any professional studies conducted at the site to identify such resources. T W No = a� N R L N (STAFF COMMENTS) C. Describe the methods used to assess the potential impacts to cultural and historic resources on or near the project site. Examples include consultation with tribes and the Department of Archeology and Historic Preservation, archaeological surveys, historic maps, GIS date, etc. WISAARD — Washington_ Information Svstem_for Architectural & Archaeological Records Data website and found nothin at t 546 Paradise Lane &dmonds�WA 9801 �. (STAFFCOMMENTS) �.D�_ _�rr�•cr�;r-,!C :•� ?��'.c,,:� WIc;AII�Q,�, d. Proposed measures to avoid, minimize, or compensate for loss, changes to, and disturbance to resources. Please include plans for the above and any permits that may be required. None (STAFF COMMENTS)__'�r�,�icl,�xF'T�ri,c,f�sr(,�v�� .•�Ic�-f��. Revised on 9119116 PaAYiF;5en2WS�9%AQWPdoc Packet Pg. 86 6.1.a 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site or affected geographic area, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Access to site is provided via connection to the south side of Paradise Lane. Paradise Lane connects to BWY 104 proximately 1 block south of the site. (STAFF COMMENTS)__N-O_J��,k a r'►r� 'lSi� * — a� �ae� — b. Is the site or affected geographic area currently served by public transit? If so, generally describe. If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Communitv Transit has a bus _stop _C#488) SE of site on the corner of HWY 104 and 102"d Place W. 0.4 miles. (STAFF COMMENTS) C. How many additional parking spaces would the completed project or nonproject proposal have? How many would the project or proposal eliminate?_ A minimum of 24 new spaces and eliminate 2 spaces. (STAFF COMMENTS) d. Will the proposal require any new or improvements to existing roads, streets, pedestrian, bicycle or state transportation facilities not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). Frontage improvements will be required along Paradise lane - Public (STAFF COMMEN N E 7 E 0 c 0 U N z 2 a� N R L Q. Revised on 9119116 Packet Pg. 87 6.1.a e. Will the project or proposal use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. There is rail service on Dayton Street near the Edmonds Waterfront. There is ferry service to Kineston on Main Street near Edmonds Waterfront. N (STAFF COMMENTS) _j—{� ]/L��Z.,: �. �+ c� O f. How man vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known indicate when V Y P P Y g � p P J � N peak volumes would occur and what percentage of the volume would be trucks (such as commercial and z passenger vehicles). What data or transportation models were used to make these estimates? am 2 60 New trips ner day. PM PeaO in and 2 out. N L Qr d E (STAFF COMMENTS) 3 g. Will the proposal interfere with, affect or be affected by the movement of agricultural and forest products on roads or streets in the area? If so, generally describe. No (STAFF COMMENTS) h. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: The City of Edmonds has a traffic.coneurrency mittatioii program whereby the City has identified_ projects designed to maintain acceptable levels of service. Mitigation will be paid according to City of Edmonds codes_ and policies. T_ (STAFF COMMENTS) us s';ic� ;+r,.R� _v)r— Revised on 9119116 PaiRdo-Q @(W Uro�Qh8© nc Packet Pg. 88 6.1.a 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, public transit, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. -- E (STAFF COMMENTS) _��r� i �cr1� �,'-tit��+F, a . �;�a'llr+.-.a� p de-rA -, ioA A A-z. to t a� b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any: y 2 Mitigation fees will be 2aid to the City of Edmonds accordine codes and policies. _ y =a L (STAFF C:OMMENTS)_. 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other: (STAFF COMMENTS) 42cac� tr�r� �,��',•}y�� 5�4,Gr�_ b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Electricity: Snohomish PUD #1 ._. Gas: PSE - Puget Sound Energy Water: Olympic View Water District Sewer: Ciq of Edmonds Revised on 9119116 PaAMOTOM§'£'FVI2RJ§A%g5loc Packet Pg. 89 6.1.a Telephone: Frontier (STAFF COMMENTS) C. SIGNATURE I declare under penalty of perjury laws that the above answers are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. io�4 /K 0—� March 27, 2018 Signature of Proponent Date Submitted E 0 c 0 U U) t a� 2 a� N R L Revised on 9119116 PahkfigbrIO1S�EP14W@ XWWoc Packet Pg. 90 6.1.a D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of _ toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? N E E — - 0 c 0 U t a� - —_—� aD 2 Proposal measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: N =a 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: Revised on 9119116 Par MW-hTOM &FP.E4 WQXWoc Packet Pg. 91 6.1.a 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: E .E E 0 c 0 - U U) 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land t or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? 2 a� N L C Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: E 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. Revised on 9119116 Pa k4njWtSBSL 1'=1W MMMdoc Packet Pg. 92 6.1.a Machuga, Jen From: Jill Wellington <jillian.wellington@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2018 8:01 AM To: Machuga, Jen Subject: Re: Comments on proposed land use action for 546 Paradise Lane Hi Jen, Absolutely, I'm happy to share my address. It is 545 Paradise Lane, Edmonds, WA 98020. Thmik you for including my comments! Jillian On May 21, 2018, at 5:13 PM, Machuga, Jen <Jen.Machu a edmondswa. ov> wrote: Hi Jillian, Thank you for your email. I will add your comments to the project file (PLN20180025) and your comments will be addressed in the staff report to the Architectural Design Board. Can you please send me your mailing address? We send most correspondence via email, but I like to make sure that we also have mailing addresses for our parties of record. Thanks, Jen Jennifer Machuga, Associate Planner City of Edmonds, Planning Division 121 - 5th Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 (425) 771-0220 ext. 1224 Jen. Mach u©agedmondswa .gvv Development Services Hours: Monday & Tuesday 8:00 AM - 4:30 PM Wednesday 8:30 AM - Noon Thursday & Friday 8:00 AM - 4:30 PM -----Original Message ----- From: Jill Wellington <jillian.wellinQton@gmaiLcorn> Sent: Monday, May 21, 2018 12:54 PM To: Machuga, Jen <Jen.Machuga edmondswa.>;ov> Subject: Comments on proposed land use action for 546 Paradise Lane Hello Jen, Please find my comments attached regarding the proposed land use of 546 Paradise Lane. I am happy to provide any additional information or feedback. Thank you so much for taking our comments into consideration. Sincerely, Packet Pg. 93 6.1.a Rktrcef v t� May 21, 2018 Fi4W'f�, ' Ar� To the City of Edmonds Development Services Department: Paradise Lane is located in a unique spot of Edmonds as it borders Highway 104. Highway 104 experiences regular heavy traffic as ferry commuters and others use the road throughout each day. This traffic produces significant air and noise pollution. The 546 Paradise Lane property holds many large trees that provide essential noise and environmental protection from the pollution from traffic on Highway 104. Any development of the 546 Paradise Lane lot would remove these trees and bring in significant, harmful noise and environmental pollution to the residents of Paradise Lane. The pollution is particularly egregious during the Spring and Summer months when ferry traffic along Highway 104 is most significant. Regularly throughout the days of these seasons, the ferry line backs up on Highway 104 and leaves a long line of idling traffic near Paradise Lane. Again, the natural environmental barriers (trees) currently on the 546 Paradise Lane property provide essential protection to the residents of Paradise Lane from the harmful effects of pollution that exist from hours and hours of idling traffic on this road. The trees also provide relief from noise pollution from these idling cars, which is an important quality of life for Paradise Lane residents. Paradise Lane does not have the capacity to endure the significant increase in traffic that would come with having XX additional residents with the proposed development of the 546 Paradise Lane property. Paradise Lane is a small road that regularly has walkers, joggers, and bicyclists accessing the pedestrian trail to downtown Edmonds. The pedestrians and bicyclists enjoy safety in the amount of current limited traffic on this road. By increasing the number of residents, you would increase the number of cars and possible vehicular injuries to the many people who enjoy this route to downtown Edmonds. The City of Edmonds has a responsibility to maintain the integrity of the Paradise Lane neighborhood. Natural environmental elements are essential components of what makes communities desirable and safe. One of the essential elements to the quality of life of Paradise Lane residents is having privacy and protection from the harmful elements of Highway 104, and the many trees and bushes of the 546 Paradise Lane property in its current status create that important quality of life for the Paradise Lane community. If the City of Edmonds allows the 546 Paradise Lane property to be developed, the City would be knowingly harming and deserting the current residents of Paradise Lane. Jillian & Nick Wellington Current residents of Paradise Lane Packet Pg. 94 6.1.a Machuga, Jen From: Machuga, Jen Sent: Friday, June 8, 2018 4:28 PM To: 'Jacquee Owens' Subject: RE: Paradise Heights Design Review Application (PLN20180025) Hi Jacquee, Thank you for your email. I will add your comments to the project file and will include you as a party of record. I will Lane Engineering Program Manager and will get back discuss your question related to the widening of Paradise with our to you next week with more information on what frontage improvements would be required as part of the subject .2 c S proposal. 0 0 U Sincerely, z a� Jen x Jennifer Machuga, Associate Planner a� N City of Edmonds, Planning Division 121 - 5th Avenue North d Edmonds, WA 98020 .. (425) 771-0220 ext. 1224 N Jen. Mach uga!2edmonidswa. gov a� Development Services Hours: Monday & Tuesday 8:00 AM - 4:30 PM Wednesday 8:30 AM - Noon Thursday & Friday 8:00 AM - 4:30 PM From: Jacquee Owens <jacqueeo@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, June 5, 2018 11:34 AM To: Machuga, Jen <Jen.Mach uga@edmondswa.gov> Subject: Re: Paradise Heights Design Review Application (PLN20180025) Hi Jen N As a abutting neighbor one of my major concerns is traffic and how a. the actual access to the plat is done. It is difficult to see from the drawings how close the development road is to the property line on the East. There was probably a good reason for locating the access a on the East side but with this space use there appears to be no guest parking. That means that the sides of Paradise Lane will be utilized for that purpose. If the city is planning to widen the road right of way to accommodate this I would like to know. I will go back and read the municipal code again. Just looking at the plan I can foresee people parking in front of the house that I own. There Attachment 10-fLN20180025 Packet Pg. 95 6.1.a is a lot of pedestrian Traffic in general and dog walkers that come up the path from Edmonds and go on to SR 104 or back into town. From a tree safety point it appears that the site will be basically clear cut. It is difficult to see what landscaping will be restored to the site. ]acauee Owens N 425-344-4991 PO Box 12922 0 0 Mill Creek, WA 98082 On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 5:28 PM, Machuga, Jen <Jen.Machu a edmondswa. ov> wrote: a� W x Hi Jacquee, n I understand that you were in at the counter this afternoon and spoke with Michele Szafran regarding the design review application for the proposed Paradise Heights development at 546 Paradise Lane (File No. PLN20180025). Michele mentioned that you would like to be put on a contact list for this project. Please note that in order to be considered a party of record on a project, you would need to submit written comments regarding the proposal. You are welcome to mail or email any comments to my attention and I can add you as a party of record. Only parties of record have the right to appeal a decision on a project once it is issued. Feel free to contact me with any questions. My contact info is in my signature below. Sincerely, Jen Jennifer Machuga, Associate Planner City of Edmonds, Planning Division 121 - 5th Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 (425) 771-0220 ext. 1224 )en.Machuga@edmondswa.gov L Attachment 10-7 PLN20180025 Packet Pg. 96 6.1.a Development Services Hours: Monday & Tuesday 8:00 AM - 4:30 PM Wednesday 8:30 AM - Noon Thursday & Friday 8:00 AM - 4:30 PM Jacquee Owens 425-344-4991 cell Attachment 10-ELN20180025 Packet Pg. 97 6.1.a Machuga, Jen From: William Mezger <mezg3@comcast.net> Sent: Friday, June 8, 2018 5:09 PM To: Machuga, Jen Subject: Re: PLN20180025 Jen, I did not add attachments. I had images, but I decided against them. I did not proof read sufficiently.:) Thank you again! Bill Sent from my Whone On Jun 8, 2018, at 4:33 PM, Machuga, Jen <Jen.Machug_a@edmondswa.g_ov> wrote: Hi William, Thank you for your comments. I will add your letter to the project file and will include you as a party of record. Item #1 in your letter says "see enclosures ###". Did you intend to include any enclosures with your letter? If so, I did not receive them. I will discuss your comments related to roadway width and sidewalks with our Engineering Program Manager and will get back to you next week with more information on what frontage improvements would be required for the subject proposal. Also, regarding the timing on submitting comments, we can accept comments on the proposal up until the close of the public hearing (the hearing date is not yet scheduled), so you and/or your neighbors are still welcome to submit additional comments in the meantime. Sincerely, Jen Jennifer Machuga, Associate Planner City of Edmonds, Planning Division 121 - 5th Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 (425) 771-0220 ext. 1224 en.Machu a0edmondswa.Qcv Development Services Hours: Monday & Tuesday 8:00 AM - 4:30 PM Wednesday 8:30 AM - Noon Thursday & Friday 8:00 AM - 4:30 PM From: William Mezger <me 3 comcast.net> Sent: Tuesday, June 5, 2018 6:20 PM To: Machuga, Jen <Jen.Machu a edmondswa. ov> Subject: Re: PLN20180025 Here is my comment. It is attached. Thank you for your help! Attachment 11-PLN20180025 Packet Pg. 98 6.1.a On Jun 4, 2018, at 9:26 AM, Machuga, Jen <Jen.Machuga@edmondswa.gov> wrote: Hi William, You are welcome to submit any comments to me directly over email. Or, you can mail or drop off a letter to my attention at the address below. I try to respond to all email comments within a day or two to confirm receipt, so if you don't hear back from me after sending your comments, please call to verify that I received them. Please include your email address and mailing address with your comments so that we can add you as a party of record to the project file. Feel free to contact me with any further questions. Sincerely, Jen Jennifer Machuga, Associate Planner City of Edmonds, Planning Division 121 - 5th Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 (425) 771-0220 ext. 1224 Jen. Machuga@edmondswa.goy Development Services Hours: Monday & Tuesday 8:00 AM - 4:30 PM Wednesday 8:30 AM - Noon Thursday & Friday 8:00 AM 4:30 PM -----Original Message ----- From: William Mezger <mezg3@comcast.net> Sent: Sunday, June 3, 2018 5:40 PM To: Machuga, Jen <Jen.Machuga@edmondswa.goy> Subject: PLN20180025 I want to make a comment about this proposal in order to achieve standing before any hearing. Is it acceptable to e-mail it, or do you need the comment in writing? Please let me know. Thanks, William Mezger, Spinaker Condominium, Edmonds Attachment 112- PLN20180025 Packet Pg. 99 6.1.a I and the owners of the Spinnaker Homeowner's Association have grave concerns with Proposal PLN20180025. Our concerns center on the lack of information provided in the plan to mitigate what we see are serious flaws in the proposal. The flaws have not been addressed by the proposing party, nor has the city of Edmonds addressed them in the documents and information resulting from our research, hurried though it was due to the unfairly short response time frame. These concerns focus on, but are not limited to, five basic inadequacies in the plan: Road adequacy, Safety for pedestrians using the walking path, Parking inadequacy, Construction disruptions and Environmental impact. 1. Ingress and Egress: Paradise Lane is inadequate to handle the 60% increase in traffic (21 residences to 33 residences x 2.01 vehicles per household) certain to occur with a sixty percent increase in the density of the cul de sac. The plan contains no information about how the plan intends to mitigate the 18' wide road to accommodate the extra traffic. (see enclosures ###) It is not possible for two passenger vehicles to ingress and egress Paradise Lane without one vehicle pulling toward the road edge and often onto lawns and driveways. Larger vehicles such as delivery trucks, solid waste disposal vehicles and emergency equipment barely navigate the "U shaped drive. Despite this obvious flaw, identified during previous, unsuccessful attempts to develop the property, no accommodation has been made in the plan for the improvements necessary to make normal access relatively convenient. 2. Pedestrian Safety: Paradise Lane serves as a trail head for the walking and bicycle path to downtown Edmonds. Pedestrian traffic utilizing the path are forced to walk on paradise Lane, already inadequate for increased automobile traffic, in order to access the trail. When accessing this condominium, drivers must pull to the opposite side of the road to allow toddlers and parents to safely walk to and from (Often with their backs to the traffic!) the trail entrance. A very large number of small children access the path. Yet, despite the obvious danger to them with the increased traffic, no accommodation appears in the plan for a sidewalk (which is necessary in addition to the street enhancement) to mitigate the risk to those children. 3. Parking: There are 8.70 vehicles in Washington for every ten people. There are 2.3 people on average residing in each Edmonds household. These statistics mean that parking in the proposed complex, is very slightly inadequate for the number of anticipated residents. The site plan addresses that imperative by including two parking spaces for every household anticipated in the plan. Disturbingly, the plan does not provide any accommodation for visitors, delivery vehicles or any other non-resident parking. Our experience suggests that the amount of parking along Paradise Lane is severely constricted, by the density and the narrow road. A 60% increase in visitors, delivery trucks and other accesses, will overwhelm the number of parking spaces and force existing residents to scramble to accommodate visitors. Parking must be addressed to mitigate the impact on the twenty one other residential units on Paradise Lane. RecEtvEjv StjN o 6 2018 Attachment 11 - PLN20180025 pL Packet Pg. 100 6.1.a 4. Construction disruption: The project as written implies significant construction impact -all occurring on Paradise Lane. Our concerns, stated in this paragraph do not include the impact to residents for the absolutely necessary improvement to the road. According to the plan, Paradise lane will have to accommodate at least ## truckloads of dirt moved by large trucks. We also anticipate a significant increase in delivery trucks for concrete, lumber, building materials and construction workers. The only access to the Western portion of the area is Paradise Lane. Construction activity suggests that, at times, current residents will be unable to access their homes. During a recent construction of one unit in the cul de sac portion of Paradise Lane, some construction vehicles trespassed on Spinnaker Condominium property in order to maneuver the street. The problems associated with possible trespass and denial of access have not been addressed, by the plan. 5. Environmental Considerations: We are fundamentally concerned about environmental impact that the permanent destruction of the mature trees and foliage from this project will have on the rest of the neighborhood. Edmonds Way is an extremely busy thoroughfare, particularly when a ferry lands. The road carries an unusual number of heavy trucks and motorcycles which are extremely loud. The removal of the mature tree growth will increase the noise level in the neighborhood, by as much as 60% enough to make hearing conversation difficult outside local residences. This is unacceptable. Yet, no stipulation has been made in the plan to ameliorate the additional noise. We are concerned that this has not been addressed in the plan. The removal of the foliage will expose neighbors to the "back side" of the proposed complex as the project will face Edmonds Way. We will see the sides of the buildings and the dumpster enclosure. This is a significant degradation of both the other residence's view, but also the general ambiance of the neighborhood. The plan does not address the degradation the other 21 owners will experience. We are very concerned by this omission. Additionally, the plan has not addressed environmental issues such as water run-off, increased vehicle exhaust emissions that the plants previously mitigated. The city of Edmonds has not yet addressed this issue, given the dearth of information available to the neighborhood, exacerbated by the short time frame given to complete our research and response. This is unacceptable. I and the Spinnaker Homeowners Association are very concerned with the fact that these issues have not been addressed. Further, we are very concerned that the short time frame allotted to us for response failed to afford us time to do the necessary research required to formulate a more informed opinion about the project. Until these issues are addressed, to our satisfaction, we will remain opposed to the project. William Mezger Attachment 11 - PLN20180025 Packet Pg. 101 SNO vi C)Ml s i I COON I-Y a J_ I J I PUBLIC U711_11Y DIN] RICV NO. 1 Diane Cunningham City of Edmonds 121 5" Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 Dear Ms. Cunningham: Providing quality water, power acid service at a competitive price that our customers valire May 11, 2018 Reference No.: PLN20180025 Paradise Heights District DR Number: 18-092 The District presently has sufficient electric system capacity to serve the proposed development. However, the existing District facilities in the local area may require upgrading. The developer is required to supply the District with suitable locations/easements on all parcels where electrical facilities must be installed to serve the proposed development. It is unlikely that easements will be granted on District -owned property, or consents granted within District transmission line corridors. Existing PUD facilities may need relocations or modifications at the developer's expense. Any relocation, alteration or removal of District facilities to accommodate this project shall be at the expense of the project developer, and must be coordinated with the PUD in advance of final design. Please include any utility work in all applicable permits. Cost of any work, new or upgrade, to existing facilities that is required to connect this proposed development to the District electric system shall be in accordance with the applicable District policy. The developer will be required to supply the District with suitable locations/easements upon its property for any electrical facilities that must be installed to serve the proposed development. Please contact the District prior to design of the proposed project. For .information about specific electric service requirements, please call the District's South County once at 425-670-3200 to contact a Customer Engineer. Sincerely, 4�&)t_ *� Llia (- I Jason Zyskowski Senior Manager Planning, Engineering, & Technical Services 1802 — 75'h Street S.W. • Everett, wA • 982031 Alailirlg Address: P.O. Box 1107 • Everett, WA • 98206-1107 425-783-4300 • Toll -free in Western Washington at 1-877-783-1000, ext. 4300 • wvnv.snopud.com Attachment 12 - PLN20180025 Packet Pg. 102 6.1.a Machuga, Jen From: Machuga, Jen Sent: Monday, May 21, 2018 1:48 PM To: 'Alm, Peter' Cc: Frantz, Randy; Cunningham, Diane Subject: RE: SEPA DNS for Paradise Heights (PLN20180025) Hi Peter, Thanks for your email. A complete civil construction plan review, including stormwater management, will be conducted by the City's Engineering Division at the building permit review phase of the project. 0 c Sincerely, 0 U U) Jen a� Jennifer Machuga, Associate Planner = as City of Edmonds, Planning Division N 121 - 5th Avenue North M cv Edmonds, WA 98020 t`c (425) 771-0220 ext. 1224 d 7en.Machu edmond wa. ov N Development Services Hours: Monday & Tuesday 8:00 AM - 4:30 PM Wednesday 8:30 AM - Noon Thursday & Friday 8:00 AM - 4:30 PM From: Alm, Peter <AlmP@wsdot.wa.gov> Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2018 7:21 AM To: Machuga, Jen <Jen.Machuga@edmondswa.gov> Cc: Frantz, Randy <FrantzR@wsdot.wa.gov>; Cunningham, Diane <Diane.Cunningham@edmondswa.gov> Subject: RE: SEPA DNS for Paradise Heights (PLN20180025) Hi Jen, WSDOT has no hydraulic concerns regarding page 13 of the Geotechnical Engineering Study. The only observation mentioned was; It appears the development will have a stormsewer pipe outfalling from the site into an existing Catch Basin along the highway. The re -development should be meeting local requirements for stormwater (flow control and water quality treatment). The designer should look at the angle of the outfall pipe as it enters the existing catch basin structure to be sure the pipe will fit into the catch basin opening at the angle of approach proposed." Thank you, Peter Alm WSDOT — NW Region Development Services Mail Stop 240 206-440-4711 15700 Dayton Avenue North Seattle, WA 98133-9710 Attachment 13 - f'LN20180025 Packet Pg. 103 6.1.a From: Alm, Peter Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2018 9:06 AM To: Machuga, Jen <Jen.Machu a edmondswa. ov> Cc: Frantz, Randy <FrantzR wsdot.wa. ov>; Cunningham, Diane <Diane.Cunnin ham edmondswa. ov> Subject: RE: SEPA DNS for Paradise Heights (PLN20180025) Thank you Jen, I've sent it to Hydraulics for comment. Thank you, Peter Alm WSDOT— NW Region Development Services Mail Stop 240 206-440-4711 15700 Dayton Avenue North Seattle, WA 98133-9710 From: Machuga, Jen <Jen. Mach uga@edmondswa.gov> Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2018 1:51 PM To: Alm, Peter <AlmP wsdot.wa. ov> Cc: Frantz, Randy <FrantzR@wsdot.wa gov>; Cunningham, Diane<Diane.Cunningham@edmondswa.gov> Subject: RE: SEPA DNS for Paradise Heights (PLN20180025) Hi Peter, The Geotechnical Engineering Study for this project is attached. Refer to Page 13 for information related to drainage and the geotech's infiltration evaluation. Feel free to contact me with any further questions. Sincerely, Jen Jennifer Machuga, Associate Planner City of Edmonds, Planning Division 121 - 5th Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 (425) 771-0220 ext. 1224 Jert.Machuga wed me ndswa_gQv Development Services Hours: Monday & Tuesday 8:00 AM - 4:30 PM Wednesday 8:30 AM - Noon Thursday & Friday 8:00 AM - 4:30 PM From: Cunningham, Diane Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2018 8:27 AM To: Machuga, Jen <Jen.Machuga@edmondswa.gov> Subject: FW: SEPA DNS for Paradise Heights (PLN20180025) Attachment 13Z PLN20180025 Packet Pg. 104 6.1.a From: Alm, Peter <AImP@wsdot.wa-A.. P Sent: Monday, May 14, 2018 1:56 PM To: Cunningham, Diane <Diane.Cunnin ham edmondswa. ov> Cc: Frantz, Randy <FrantzR wsdot.wa. ov> Subject: RE: SEPA DNS for Paradise Heights (PLN20180025) Hello Diane, Would you please have the requester provide the hydraulics report for this site so WSDOT can review it. Thanks. Thank you, Peter Alm WSDOT — NW Region Development Services Mail Stop 240 206-440-4711 15700 Dayton Avenue North Seattle, WA 98133-9710 From: Cunningham, Diane <Diane.Cunnin ham edmondswa. ov> Sent: Monday, May 07, 2018 4:42 PM To: 'Bill Trimm' <bill townofwoodwa .com>; 'DAHP' <se a dah .wa. ov>; 'gmstacey' < mstace sno ud.com>; 'Kate Tourtellot' <kate.tourtellot commtrans.or >; Fordjour, Kojo <FordioK wsdot.wa. ov>; 'Olympic View Water' <Kell B ovwater.com>; Pazooki, Ramin <PazookR wsdot.wa. ov>;'SEPA Unit' <se aunit ec .wa. ov>;'SnoPUD' <mlwicklund sn❑ ud.com>;'Zachary Lamebull' <zlamebull tulaii tribes-nsn. ov>; Zweber, Kevin <Kevin. Zwebe r@ edmondswa. ov_>; 'David Matulich' <david.matulich se.com> Cc:'rwmichel@nwlink.com' <rwmichel nwlink.com>;'jsrett@gmail.com' <'srett mail.com> Subject: SEPA DNS for Paradise Heights (PLN20180025) Attached is the SEPA DNS issued on May 8, 2018 for the Paradise Heights multi -family development (File No. PLN20180025). Also attached is the environmental checklist (with staffs comments) and a vicinity map and preliminary site plan. Thank you, Diane Cunningham I Planning Administrator 121 5th Ave. North Edmonds, WA 98020 Attachment 13 - I LN20180025 Packet Pg. 105 6.1.a Date: To: From: Subject: MEMORANDUM April 20, 2018 Jen Machuga, Associate Planner Leif Bjorback, Building Official Paradise Heights Condos 546 Paradise Lane PLN2018-0025 The City of Edmonds Building Division has performed a preliminary building code review of the plans that were submitted under the referenced application number, and have the following comments. 1. Building permits will be required for the following, as applicable: New multifamily construction; modifications to or demolition of existing structures. 2. It appears the structures will be designed under the IBC, and will need to incorporate all accessibility requirements found in IBC chapter 11. 3. Park Impact fees will be assessed for each new dwelling unit at a rate of $2340.16 each. The overall fee may be reduced provided the new construction occurs within one year of the demolition of the old structure. Thank you. City of EdrApAA&Fq-1k 5Department Packet Pg. 106 6.1.a Date: To: From: Subject: MEMORANDUM April 24, 2018 Jen Machuga, Associate Planner Jeanie McConnell, Engineering Program Manager PLN20180025 — Design Review — Three 4-unit Condos Paradise Heights — 546 Paradise Lane The comments provided below are based upon review of the application and documents submitted for the subject application. Additional information is requested from the applicant at this time. Please ask the applicant to respond to the following. The following comments are based on the large format P1 - Plot, Utility, & Grading Plan, which does not appear to be consistent with the reduced plan set nor the landscape plan. 1. Revise P1 to provide labeling of proposed access road width throughout. 2. Revise P1 to indicate where driveway centerline slope cross sections are located in plan view. 3. Provide a copy of the Edmonds Utilties Consortium form confirming contact has been made with the various utility providers regarding the proposed development. Thank you. City of Edmonds Attachment 14 - PLN20180025 Packet Pg. 107 6.1.a South Snohomish County FIRE & RESCUE CITY OF EDMONDS DEPARTMENT OF FIRE PREVENTION 4/17/2018 Pre -application notes for— PLN20180025, 548 Paradise Ln, Edmonds 3-4 Unit Condos Jen Machuga Need elevations of eaves/ Balconies between Buildings B and A. Requirement is 20' wide with 13'6" clearance in height — See fire access standard that is attached. Approved access and turnaround Building B and C. Interior Hydrant and FDC locations approved. Please contact me to discuss some options. Karl Fitterer Fire Prevention Deputy Fire Marshal South Snohomish County Fire & Rescue Kfitterer southsnafire.org 425-551-1980 12425 Meridian Avenue S / Everett WA 98208 / 425-551-1200 IN' ww.fire district 1.org Attachment 14 - PLN20180025 Packet Pg. 108 6.1.a CITY OF EDMONDS 121 51h Avenue North, Edmonds WA 98020 Phone: 425.771.0220 • Fax: 425.771.0221 • Web: www.edmondswa.gov DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT • PLANNING DIVISION 'nC. 189- May 15, 2018 Mr. Robin W. Michel Michel Design Via email: rwmichel@nwlink.com SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION LOCATED AT 546 PARADISE LANE, FILE NO. PLN20180025 Dear Mr. Michel: During staff s continued review of your land use application for design review of three, four -unit multi- family buildings located at 546 Paradise Lane (File No. PLN20180025), it was determined that additional information/clarification is necessary. Please respond to the following items at your earliest convenience so that staff s review of the proposal can continue: Inconsistencies were noted between the landscape plan and plot plan. For example. The width of the drive aisle is labeled as being 20 feet to the west of the southwestern corner of Building A, but this width scales at roughly 12 feet on the landscape plan. It appears that the landscape beds on the southern sides of the proposed buildings shifted when the landscape plan was printed, which may have caused the issues with inconsistencies between these plans. After making all requested corrections to the plans in response to the comments below and those within the attached letters from the Engineering Division and Fire District, please be sure that all plan sets are consistent and correctly reflect the distances and dimensions of the proposal. 2. Please provide a key for all line styles utilized on the plot plan. Surrounding all three proposed buildings are dashed and dotted black lines. In addition, Buildings B and C have blue lines surrounding the building footprint. It is unclear if these lines are indicating decks, eaves, building cantilevers, etc. Please clearly indicate the footprints of the proposed buildings, cantilevers, decks, eaves, etc. 3. The RM-2.4 zone requires the following minimum setbacks: Street = 15', Side = 10', Rear = 15'. The subject site is a corner lot. Thus, the site requires 15' street setbacks from all property lines adjacent to right-of-way, including the northern, western, and southwestern property lines, and 10' side setbacks are required from the two property lines adjacent to the RS-6 zoned properties. Please address the following comments related to setback requirements: a. It appears that the project was designed with only a 10' setback from the westernmost property line; however, a 15' street setback is required from this property line since this property line is adjacent to City right-of-way. This will cause the need to shift Building A to the southeast and/or possibly to reduce the footprint of this building to accommodate the required setbacks. b. As discussed above, it is unclear what the various line styles on the plot plan are indicating. Please keep in mind that all building cantilevers and decks must comply with the minimum Attachment 14 - PLN20180025 Packet Pg. 109 6.1.a required setbacks, and no more than 30" of eaves may project into the minimum required setbacks. The blue lines on the plot plan appear project into the street setback by more than 30", particularly on the side of Building C facing Paradise Lane. When revising the plans to clearly indicate all building projections and overhangs, please be sure that all portions of the proposed structures comply with the applicable setback requirements of ECDC 16.30.030. c. The proposed retaining walls (particularly at the northwestern corner of the site) appear to exceed three feet in height as measured over original grade. Any retaining walls that exceed three feet in height over original grade must comply with the minimum required setbacks for the site. Please revise accordingly, and provide top of wall and original grade elevations at E five-foot intervals along all proposed walls. 4. Your cover letter indicates that "all mechanical equipment is either totally screened or situated E 0 inside the buildings." For any mechanical equipment that is proposed outside of the buildings, please indicate locations and screening. v N 5. The design objectives of the Comprehensive Plan specify that circulation should be provided within sites to encourage linkages for pedestrians, vehicles, and bicycles. Although the driveway provides vehicular connections throughout the site, pedestrian connections should also be provided between the buildings and from within the site to Paradise Lane. Also, as stated in the Comprehensive Plan, the building entries should be oriented to the pedestrian walkways/pathways. Please indicate the proposed pedestrian connections on all applicable plan a sheets. th 6. Respond to the following related to proposed lighting: a. The landscape plan indicates a few locations where porch lights will be provided. Is any other exterior illumination proposed for the subject development? b. Please provide spec sheets for all proposed exterior lighting fixtures. Your submittal indicates that the exterior lighting will be minimal; however, additional information on the proposed fixtures is needed for the design review phase of the process in order to confirm compliance with the requirements of ECDC 20.11.03O.B.8. 7. Respond to the following related to proposed landscaping: a. As required by ECDC 20.13.01O.G, please indicate all existing trees (six inches in caliper or more) and indicate which trees are to be removed as part of the proposal. Your cover letter indicates "all trees that can be retained add to the overall natural feel of the proposal." Based on the locations of the proposed buildings and paved areas, it appears that the proposal would not allow for the retention of many of the existing trees. Please indicate which existing trees are to be retained and which are to be removed with the proposal. b. As required by ECDC 20.13.010.K, indicate the location of the irrigation system. c. There are species within the planting schedule that have not been found on the landscape plan. For example, no mountain hemlocks or prymidalis are found on the landscape plan. d. It is unclear on the landscape plan where the cistus salvifolius and cedar !ence are to be located. Yellow lines were observed in a few locations on the plans, but it is unclear which of these two items are being indicated. Please clarify. e. Type III landscaping according to ECDC 20.13.030.0 is appropriate around all sides of the subject site. Pursuant to ECDC 2O.13.02O.17, "all planting areas should be at least four feet wide between curbs." It was noted that no landscaping is provided along the two southernmost property lines, and the width of the landscape bed along the eastern property line is less than four feet wide. It appears that landscape buffers along these property lines is Attachmep646 2 0YD420180025 Packet Pg. 110 6.1.a appropriate, particularly where adjacent to the RS-6 zoned properties to the east and southeast. If you are requesting that the ADB approve any modifications to the landscaping requirements, provide a written explanation as to why you feel a modification to the landscaping requirements is appropriate for the subject proposal. f. Type III landscaping requires evergreen and deciduous trees, with no more than 50 percent being deciduous, a minimum of six feet in height and planted at intervals no greater than 30 feet on center. It appears that additional evergreen trees will need to be provided in order to comply with this requirement. Additionally, the minimum height of the Italian Cyprus will need to be increased to six feet. g. ECDC 20.13.020.M states that "landscaping should be tall enough to soften any dumpster enclosures located in planting areas." Please add additional shrubs at the southeastern corner of the site to meet this requirement. h. Refer to ECDC 20.13.015 for minimum sizes at installation and maximum spacing of all shrubs and groundcover. When updating the landscape plan, please ensure that the proposal complies with the minimum sizes and maximum spacing for all proposed plants. 8. Respond to the following related to the geotechnical report: a. The report included with your submittal is undated and unsigned. It appears that possibly some pages from the report were missing at the time of submittal. Please provide a dated and signed report prepared by a qualified professional as defined in ECDC 23.80.050.A. b. The Plates referred to in the geotechnical report were not attached to the report. Please provide a full report including these attachments. c. As discussed above, the proposed retaining walls will need to be modified in order to comply with setback requirements. Please provide your geotechnical engineer with the revised project plans once revised to address the setback requirements for the proposed retaining walls in order to ensure that the changes to the retaining walls won't cause any changes to the conclusions within the report. d. The report lists the documents that were reviewed as part of their report preparation, which included a preliminary drainage and plot plan dated July 3, 2008. Please provide the geotechnical engineer with the current project proposal for review and ask the engineer to provide an addendum to the previous report referencing the current project plans and commenting on any additional recommendations. 9. Please note that the lot coverage and height calculations will be reviewed in detail for compliance with the RM-2.4 site development standards at the time of building permit application review. During review of the subject application, it was noted, however, that the northwestern corner of the height rectangle for proposed Building A is significantly different than the elevation of the nearest contour line. Also, as discussed above, it is difficult to determine which lines on the site plans are building cantilevers, decks, eaves, or other projections, which could impact the lot coverage calculations and height calculations. Note that no more than 30" of eaves may be excluded from the lot coverage calculations and from the height rectangle. Please contact me if you have any questions on the lot coveraga calculations or height calculations. 10. Refer to the enclosed memorandum from Karl Fitterer, Deputy Fire Marshal with South Snohomish County Fire & Rescue, dated April 17, 2018. As part of your response, please include a cover letter stating how each comment was addressed. Any questions on the comments in the enclosed memorandum may be directed to Karl Fitterer at Karl.Fitterer edmondswa. ov or (425) 771-0266. AttachmenPm4e BIdAg0180025 Packet Pg. 111 6.1.a 11. Refer to the enclosed memorandum from Jeanie McConnell, Engineering Program Manager, dated April 24, 2018. As part of your response, please include a cover letter stating how each comment was addressed. Any questions on the comments in the enclosed memorandum may be directed to Jeanie McConnell at Jeanie.McConnell@a edmondswa.goy or (425) 771-0220. Please submit the above information to the Planning Division as soon as possible so that staff may continue processing your application. Please keep in mind that a complete response to this information request must be received within 90 days or the application will lapse for lack of information (ECDC 20.02.003.D). Thus, your application will expire if the requested information is not received by Au ust 13,201 If you have any questions, feel free to contact me at Jen.Machuga@edmondswa.gov or (425) 771-0220. Sincerely, Development Services Department - Planning Division Jen Mach uga Associate Planner Cc: File No. PLN20180025 Enclosures: Memo dated April 17, 2018 from Karl Fitterer, Deputy Fire Marshal Memo dated April 24, 2018 from Jeanie McConnell, Engineering Program Manager AttachmftgW4 ffA20180025 Packet Pg. 112 6.1.a RECEP V7 `7'` PLN20180025 •- - 546 PARADISE LANE JUN 11 Planning Department ADB Review Response OEVELOPiOfl`d7 SEI%VIt..laS COUNTER Comment letter of MAY 15, 2018 Response 6/11/18: 1. See new plot plan and landscape plans of 6/11/2018 2. See new key P1 tope of sheet. 3. See new 15 foot setback at Building A 3b. See Key. All coverage calculated at all cantilevers and eves over 30". 3c. See changes in retaining wall with new set back and retaining walls following contours. 4. No exterior mechanical equipment proposed. 5. See Pedestrian Pathway on Landscape plan 6a. Porch lights and lights at garage doors 6b. See attached spec sheet and indication below plant schedule 7a. See P1 For existing trees and sizes in green and one to remain 7b. See "IS" for irrigation system at west end of each building 7c. Fixed 7d. Cistus salvifolius is the yellow on plans at drive entry, entry to buildings and north sides of buildings. Fence is at south property line 7e. In order to provide access to three buildings driveways had to be provided at the south side of the buildings. Since the property to the West is steep ROW with many mature trees, this provides buffer to the west. A new fence will be provided at the south property line along with addition landscaping and existing trees to remain. An arbor will be provide per ECDC to enhance the fence with evergreen vines. 7f. Appropriate changes have been made the plans. 7g. Dumpster has been removed and the additional landscaping provided. Since the removal of the dumpster enclosure we were able to retain existing evergreen. 7h. Plans have been updated to meet ECDC 20.13.020.M 8a. See attached report 8b. See attached report 8c. Changes in retaining wall will not change report 8d. Report addendum to be provided at appropriate time when all changes identified. 9. See revised height calculations to match existing topo. 10. Two of the 3 items were approved and other items have sent to Karl. 11. See Sheet P2 for Jeanie requested items. See Sheet Pl for road widths. EUC in process and will be completed by Permit Submittal as indicated on the EUC form "rev. 10/1/13. EUC is not on the Design Review Application Checklist Thank you. Rob Michel 206-930-2445 Attachment 14 - PLN20180025 Packet Pg. 113 6.1.a Machuga, Jen From: Fitterer, Karl (Fire District Address) Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2018 12:15 PM To: Rob Michel Cc: Machuga, Jen Subject: RE: 548 Paradise Lane Attachments: PRE20180025_548 Paradise Ln_3-4 unit Condos 2.pdf Rob, I have attached an approval to the Planning document and in Permittrax. I have also included Jen in this email Karl Fitterer CFI Duputy Fire Marshal kfitterer@southsnofire.org City's of Brier, Edmonds and Mountlake Terrace Department of Fire Prevention 425-771-0213 425-551-1980 The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access or use by any other person to this internet email is not authorized and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete or destroy this email. If you do not wish to receive future emails from this sender, please reply directly to this email requesting you be removed from any mailing list. From: Rob Michel [rwmichel@nwlink.com] Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2018 9:07 AM To: Fitterer, Karl Subject: 548 Paradise Lane Hi Karl: Have you had a chance to review plans I sent? Please let me know. Thank you. Rob Attachment 14 1PLN20180025 Packet Pg. 114 6.1.a South Snohomish County FIRE & RESCUE CITY OF EDMONDS DEPARTMENT OF FIRE PREVENTION 6/19/2018 Pre -application notes for— PLN20180025, 548 Paradise Ln, Edmonds 3-4 Unit Condos Jen Machuga Approved eaves/ Balconies between Buildings B and A. City of Edmonds development services/building official may have additional requirements regarding distances to lot line and fire resistant construction. Approved access and turnaround Building B and C. Fire lanes will need to be stripped and signage provided. See fire access standard that is attached. Interior Hydrant and FDC locations approved. Please contact me if you have any other concerns. Karl Fitterer Fire Prevention Deputy Fire Marshal South Snohomish County Fire & Rescue Kfitterer southsnofire.or 425-551-1980 12425 Meridian Avenue S / Everett WA 98208 / 425-551-1200 www.fire district 1.org Attachment 14 - PLN20180025 Packet Pg. 115 6.1.a South Snohomish County FIRE & RESCUE Updated: Jan 2018 NOTE: Detailed plans must be submitted, and approved, prior to painting any new fire lane or modifying any existing fire lane. Fire Lanes must: 1) Be a minimum unobstructed width of 20 feet and minimum unobstructed vertical clearance of 13 feet, 6 inches. *Fire lanes shall be a minimum of 26 feet wide in the immediate vicinity of any building over 30 feet in height above grade. Such fire lanes shall be located a minimum of 15 feet and a maximum of 25 feet from the building. 2) Provide Fire Department access to within 150 feet of any portion of an un-sprinkled building. In buildings that provided with an automatic sprinkler, access may be increased, at the discretion of the Fire Marshal. 3) Provide Fire Department access to all on -site fire hydrants and fire department connections (FDC) for sprinkler and standpipe. A hydrant must be located to within 25' of a fire department connection. 4) Have adequate turning radius to allow maneuvering of fire apparatus: inside radius 25 feet-, outside radius 45 feet. 5) Be circulating or have an approved turn -around if over 150 feet long. Have grades of no more than 12%. 6) Be paved with asphalt or approved equivalent and be capable of supporting the imposed loads of fire apparatus. 7) Be marked with words "FIRE LANE — NO PARKING." Words to be painted on the pavement inside the lane. Letters to be a minimum of 12" high, 2" stroke, yellow in color, and alternately spaced every 50 feet. 8) Have perimeter striping/curbing to delineate the boundaries of the Fire Lane. Striping to be a minimum of 4 inches wide and striping/curbing to be yellow in color. 9) When required by the Fire Marshal, signs shall be used in addition to or in lieu of striping. Signs, when approved, shall meet the following requirements: a) Size: 18" high x 12" wide (min.) b) Mounting: Bottom of sign 48" to 60" above grade. c) Style- Industry standard (Vulcan %7-6-9, Rainbow 01-527, EMED TC 18816 or approved equivalent). d) Color: Red lettering on white background e) Spacing: 50' between signs or as required by Fire Marshal. 10) Fire lanes shall be established by these requirements to provide access to buildings during construction, alteration or demolition. Fire Code Supplemental Rules and Regulations are designated interpretations of the adopted International Fire Code, Edmonds Community Development Code and national standards allowed by IFC 102.7,102.8 and 102.9 and ECDC 19.25 which provide specifics and details to aid in conformance with the intent of the governing laws, statutes, ordinances and fire- and life safety -related requirements. Attachment 14 - PLN20180025 Packet Pg. 116 Geotechnical Engineering Geology. Environmental Scientists Construction MonitorinL, afy "` •+ ti Y a: �Y GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY PROPOSED MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENCES 546 PARADISE LANE EDMONDS, WASHINGTON ~ _ ES-5839 '74 L^:E�'�lc'.!'f111r� Y',,; • �a Attachment 15 - PLN20180025 t Packet Pg. 117 PREPARED FOR PARADISE HEIGHTS, LLC March 5, 2018 Samuel E. Suruda, G.I.T. Staff Geologist Henry T. Wright, P.E. Senior Project Engineer c. Kyle R. Campbell, P.E. Principal Engineer GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY PROPOSED MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENCES 546 PARADISE LANE EDMONDS, WASHINGTON ES-5839 Earth Solutions NW, LLC 1805-136 th Place Northeast, Suite 201 Bellevue, Washington 98005 Phone: 425-449-4704 1 Fax: 425-449-4711 www.earthsolutionsnw.com Attachment 15 - PLN20180025 I Packet Pg. 118 6.1.a � Geotechnical Engineering Report —� Geotechnical Services Are Performed for Specific Purposes, Persons and Projects Geotechnical engineers structure their services to meet the specific needs of their clients. A geotechnical engineering study conducted for a civil engi- neer may not fulfill the needs of a construction contractor or even another civil engineer. Because each geotechnical engineering study is unique, each geotechnical engineering report is -unique, prepared solelyfor the client. No one except you should rely on your geotechnical engineering report without first conferring with the geotechnical engineer who prepared it. And no one — not even you — should apply the report for any purpose or project except the one originally contemplated. Read the Full Report Serious problems have occurred because those relying on a geotechnical engineering report did not read it all. Do not rely on an executive summary. Do not read selected elements only. A Geotechnical Engineering Report Is Based on A Unique Set of Project -Specific Factors Geotechnical engineers consider a number of unique, project -specific fac- tors when establishing the scope of a study. Typical factors include: the client's goals, objectives, and risk management preferences; the general nature of the structure involved, its size, and configuration; the location of the structure on the site; and other planned or existing site improvements, such as access roads, parking lots, and underground utilities. Unless the geotechnical engineer who conducted the study specifically indicates oth- erwise, do not rely on a geotechnical engineering report that was: not prepared for you, not prepared for your project, • not prepared for the specific site explored, or completed before important project changes were made. Typical changes that can erode the reliability of an existing geotechnical engineering report include those that affect: the function of the proposed structure, as when it's changed from a parking garage to an office building, or from a light industrial plant to a refrigerated warehouse, • elevation, configuration, location, orientation, or weight of the proposed structure, • composition of the design team, or 0 project ownership. As a general rule, always inform your geotechnical engineer of project changes —even minor ones —and request an assessment of their impact. Geotechnical engineers cannot accept responsibility or liability for problems that occur because their reports do not considoi developments of which they were not informed. Subsurface Conditions Can Change A geotechnical engineering report is based on conditions that existed at the time the study was performed. Do not rely on a geotechnical enghwt- ing reportwhose adequacy may have been affected by: the passage of time; by man-made events, such as construction on or adjacent to the site; or by natural events, such as floods, earthquakes, or groundwater fluctua- tions. Always contact the geotechnical engineer before applying the report to determine if it is still reliable. A minor amount of additional testing or analysis could prevent major problems. Most Geotechnical Findings Are Professional Opinions Site exploration identifies subsurface conditions only at those points where subsurface tests are conducted or samples are taken. Geotechnical engi- neers review field and laboratory data and then apply their professional judgment to render an opinion about subsurface conditions throughout the site. Actual subsurface conditions may differ —sometimes significantly — from those indicated in your report. Retaining the geotechnical engineer who developed your report to provide construction observation is the most effective method of managing the risks associated with unanticipated conditions. A Report's Recommendations Are Not Final Do not overrely on the construction recommendations included in your report. Those recommendations are not final, because geotechnical engi- neers develop them principally from judgment and opinion. Geotechnical engineers can finalize their recommendations only by observing actual Attachment 15 - PLN20180025 Packet Pg. 119 6.1.a subsurface conditions revealed during construction. The geotechnical engineer who developed your report cannot assume responsibility or liability for the report's recommendations if that engineer does not perform construction observation. A Geotechnleal Engineering Report Is Subject to Misinterpretation Other design team members' misinterpretation of geotechnical engineering reports has resulted in costly problems. Lower that risk by having your geo- technical engineer confer with appropriate members of the design team after submitting the report. Also retain your geotechnical engineer to review perti- nent elements of the design team's plans and specifications. Contractors can also misinterpret a geotechnical engineering report. Reduce that risk by having your geotechnical engineer participate in prebid and preconstruction conferences, and by providing construction observation. Do Not Redraw the Engineer's Logs Geotechnical engineers prepare final boring and testing logs based upon their interpretation of field logs and laboratory data. To prevent errors or omissions, the logs included in a geotechnical engineering report should never be redrawn for inclusion in architectural or other design drawings. Only photographic or electronic reproduction is acceptable, but recognize that separating logs from the report can elevate risk. Give Contractors a Complete Report and Guidance Some owners and design professionals mistakenly believe they can make contractors liable for unanticipated subsurface conditions by limiting what they provide for bid preparation. To help prevent costly problems, give con- tractors the complete geotechnical engineering report, butpreface it with a clearly written letter of transmittal. In that letter, advise contractors that the report was not prepared for purposes of bid development and that the report's accuracy is limited; encourage them to confer with the geotechnical engineer who prepared the report (a modest fee may be required) and/or to conduct additional study to obtain the specific types of information they need or prefer. A prebid conference can also be valuable. Be sure contrac- tors have sufficient time to perform additional study. Only then might you be in a position to give contractors the best information available to you, while requiring them to at least share some of the financial responsibilities stemming from unanticipated conditions. Read Responsibility Provisions Closely Some clients, design professionals, and contractors do not recognize that geotechnical engineering is far less exact than other engineering disci- plines. This lack of understanding has created unrealistic expectations that have led to disappointments, claims, and disputes. To help reduce the risk of such outcomes, geotechnical engineers commonly include a variety of explanatory provisions in their reports. Sometimes labeled "limitations" many of these provisions indicate where geotechnical engineers' responsi- bilities begin and end, to help others recognize their own responsibilities and risks. Read these provisions closely. Ask questions. Your geotechnical engineer should respond fully and frankly. Geoenvfronmental Concerns Are Not Covered The equipment, techniques, and personnel used to perform a geoenviron- mental study differ significantly from those used to perform a geotechnical study. For that reason, a geotechnical engineering report does not usually relate any geoenvironmental findings, conclusions, or recommendations; e.g., about the likelihood of encountering underground storage tanks or regulated contaminants. Unanticipated environmental problems have led to numerous project failures. If you have not yet obtained your own geoen- vironmental information, ask your geotechnical consultant for risk man- agement guidance. Do not rely on an environmental report prepared for someone else. Obtain Professional Assistance To Deal with Mold Diverse strategies can be applied during building design, construction, operation, and maintenance to prevent significant amounts of mold from growing on indoor surfaces. To be effective, all such strategies should be devised for the express purpose of mold prevention, integrated into a com- prehensive plan, and executed with diligent oversight by a professional mold prevention consultant. Because just a small amount of water or moisture can lead to the development of severe mold infestations, a num- ber of mold prevention strategies focus on keeping building surfaces dry. While groundwater, water infiltration, and similar issues may have been addressed as part of the geotechnical engineering study whose findings are conveyed in -this report, the geotechnical engineer in charge of this project is not a mold prevention consultant; none of the services per- formed in connection with the geotechnical engineer's study were designed or conducted for the purpose of mold preven- tion. Proper implementation of the recommendations conveyed in this report will not of itself be sufficient to prevent maid from growing in or on the structure involved. Belt'y, on Your ASFE-Member Geotechncial Engineer for Additional Assistance Membership in ASFE/The Best People on Earth exposes geotechnical engineers to a wide array of risk management techniques that can be of genuine benefit for everyone involved with a construction project. Confer with you ASFE-member geotechnical engineer for more information. ASFE The Best People an Earth 8811 Colesville Road/Suite G106, Silver Spring, MD 20910 Telephone:301/565-2733 Facsimile:301/589-2017 e-mail: info@aste,org www.asfe.org Copy4ht 2004 by ASFE, Inc. Duplication, reproduction, or copying of this document, in whole or in part by any means whatsoever, is strictly prohibited, except with ASFE's specific written permission. Excerpting, quoting, or otherwise extracting wording from this document is permitted only with the express written permission of ASFE, and only for purposes of scholarly research or book review. Only members of ASFE may use this document as a complement to or as an element of a geotechnical engineering report. Any other firm, individual, or other entity that so uses this document without being an ASFE member could be committing negligent or Intentional (fraudulent) misrepresentation. IGER06045,0M Attachment 15 - PLN20180025 Packet Pg. 120 6.1.a March 5, 2018 ES-5839 Paradise Heights, LLC 24144 East Greystone Lane Woodway, Washington 98020 Attention: Mr. John Rettenmier Dear Mr. Rettenmier: Earth I Solutions NWLIC Earth Solutions NW LLC • Ccol:echnical Engin(Tring • Construction Monitoring • Environmental Sciences Earth Solutions NW, LLC (ESNW) is pleased to present this report titled "Geotechnical Engineering Study, Proposed Multi -Family Residences, 546 Paradise Lane, Edmonds, Washington". Based on the results of our study, construction of the proposed multi -family residential structures at the subject site is feasible from a geotechnical standpoint. The proposed residential structures can be supported on a conventional foundation system bearing on competent native soil, recompacted native soil, or structural fill. Competent native soils, suitable for support of foundations, should be encountered beginning at a depth of roughly two feet below existing grades across the majority of the site. Slab -on -grade floors should be supported on dense native soil, re -compacted native soil, or structural fill. Where loose, organic or other unsuitable materials are encountered at or below the footing subgrade elevation, the material should be removed and replaced with structural fill, as necessary. This report provides a geologically hazardous areas assessment, and recommendations for foundation subgrade preparation, foundation and retaining wall design parameters, drainage, the suitability of the on -site soils for use as structural fill, and other geotechnical recommendations. The opportunity to be of service to you is appreciated. If you have any questions regarding the content of this geotechnical engineering study, please call. Sincerely, EARTH SOLUTIONS NW, LLC Samuel E Suruda, G.I.T. Staff Geologist -1805 - 136th Place N.E , Suite 201 • Bellevue, WA 98005 • (425) 449-4704 • FAX (425) 449-4711 Attachment 15 - PLN20180025 Packet Pg. 121 0 Table of Contents ES-5839 PAGE INTRODUCTION....................................................................... General................ . . ............. .......................................... ProiectDescription .......................................................... SITECONDITIONS................................................................... 2 Surface.......................................................................... 2 Subsurface.............................................. ........................ 2 GeologicSetting ..................................................... 2 Groundwater.......................................................... 3 Geological Hazards Assessment ........................................ 3 Slope Reconnaissance ............................................ 3 Erosion Hazard Areas ............................................... 3 Landslide Hazard Areas ........................................... 4 Mapping of Geologically Hazardous Areas ................ 5 Special Study and Report Requirements ................... 5 Development Standards (General Requirements)....... 7 Development Standards (Specific Hazards) ............... 7 Analysisof Proposal.. ............................................. 9 DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS ..................................... 9 General........................................................................... 9 Site Preparation and Earthwork ........................................ 9 Temporary Erosion Control ............................................. 10 In -Situ Soils....................................................................... 10 StructuralFill..................................................................... 10 Excavations and Slopes ........................................... 11 Foundations.................................................................... 11 Seismic Considerations....................................................... 12 Slab -On -Grade Floors................. ...................................... 12 Retaining Walls.............................................................. 12 Drainace........................................................................ 13 Infiltration Evaluation, ............................................. 13 Low Impact Development ......................................... 14 Utility Trench Support and Backfill..................................... 15 Pavement Sections.......................................................... 15 LIMITATIONS....... ........... .......................................................... 15 Additional Services.......................................................... 15 Earth Solutions NW, LLC Attachment 15 - PLN20180025 Packet Pg. 122 6.1.a GRAPHICS Plate 1 Plate 2 Table of Contents Continued ES-5839 Vicinity Map Test Pit Location Plan Plate 3 Retaining Wall Drainage Detail Plate 4 Footing Drain Detail APPENDICES Appendix A Appendix B Subsurface Exploration Test Pit Logs Laboratory Test Results Earth Solutions NW, LLC E E 0 c 0 U t x N R L Q. Attachment 15 - PLN20180025 Packet Pg. 123 6.1.a GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY PROPOSED MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENCES 546 PARADISE LANE EDMONDS, WASHINGTON ES-5839 INTRODUCTION General This geotechnical engineering study was prepared for the three proposed multi -family residential structures to be constructed at 546 Paradise Lane in Edmonds, Washington. To complete the scope of services detailed in our proposal PES-5839 dated January 17, 2018 we performed the following: • Subsurface exploration and characterization of soil and groundwater conditions by way of test pits excavated at accessible areas of the site; • Laboratory testing of soil samples obtained during subsurface exploration; ® An infiltration evaluation based on observed soil conditions and the results of a Small- scale Pilot Infiltration Test (PIT); a Geotechnical engineering analyses, and; • Preparation of this report. The following documents and resources were reviewed as part of our report preparation: ® Preliminary Drainage and Plot Plan, prepared by Michel Construction, Inc., dated July 3, 2008; Geologic Map of the Edmonds East and Part of the Edmonds West Quadrangle, Washington, prepared by James P. Minard, dated 1983; Department of Ecology Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington, Volume III Hydrologic Analysis and Flow Control BMPs, dated August 2012; Edmonds City Code, Chapter 23.80 (Geologically Hazardous Areas), and; Online Web Soil Survey (WSS) resource provided by United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Natural Resources Conservation Services. ProjectDescriptian Based on the site plan provided to us, the existing single-family residential structure and garage will be demolished and three new multi -family residential structures will be constructed. We anticipate grading activities will primarily include cuts to establish the planned building alignments and roadway improvements. Based on the existing grades, we estimate cuts to establish building pad and foundation subgrade elevations will be on the order of up to four feet. Site improvements will also include underground utility installations. Earth Solutions NW, LLC Attachment 15 - PLN20180025 Packet Pg. 124 6.1.a Paradise Heights, LLC ES-5839 March 5, 2018 Page 2 At the time this report was prepared, specific building load values were not available. However, we anticipate the proposed residential structures will consist of relatively lightly loaded wood framing supported on conventional foundations. Based on our experience with similar developments, we estimate wall loads on the order of one to two kips per linear foot and slab -on - grade loading of 150 pounds per square foot (psf). If the above design assumptions are incorrect or change, ESNW should be contacted to review the recommendations in this report. ESNW should review the final design to verify the geotechnical recommendations provided in this report have been incorporated into the plans. SITE CONDITIONS Surface The subject site is located at 546 Paradise Lane in Edmonds, Washington, as illustrated on the Vicinity Map (Plate 1). The site consists of one residential tax parcel (Snohomish County parcel number 27032500302600) totaling approximately 0.91 acres of land area. The property is currently developed with a single-family residence and associated improvements. The majority of the site is relatively level with a steep slope descending on the north side of the property adjacent to Paradise Lane and gentle slope descending to the east for the driveway adjacent to Paradise Lane. Based on site observation and available topographic data, the steep slope descending to the north has a slope gradient in excess of 40 percent and elevation change of up to about 12 feet; the steep slope extends beyond the property. Vegetation within the steep slope area consists of large trees and ivy groundcover. The subject site is bordered to the west by an easement for Edmonds Way, to the east and north by Paradise Lane, and to the south by a residential property. The Test Pit Location Plan (Plate 2) illustrates the approximate limits of the property. Subsurface As part of the subsurface exploration, four test pits were excavated in accessible portions of the site for purposes of assessing soil and groundwater conditions. The test pits were advanced to a maximum depth of approximately nine feet below existing grade. Please refer to the test pit logs provided in Appendix A for a more detailed description of the subsurface conditions. Soil conditions observed at test pit locations consisted of medium dense poorly graded sand (Unified Soil Classification System: SP) outwash deposits. Overall soil relative density increased with depth. Approximately nine feet below ground surface (bgs), dense to very dense silty sand with gravel glacial till was observed (USCS: SM). The glacial till was observed to be weakly cemented and exhibited iron oxide staining. Geologic Setting According to the referenced geologic map, the subject site is underlain by advance outwash (Qva) deposits. Soil conditions observed at the test pit locations were generally consistent with outwash deposits. According to the referenced NRCS soil survey, the subject site consists of Everett series soils. Everett series soils are classified as outwash deposits and are consistent with observations made in the field. Earth Solutions NW, LLC Attachment 15 - PLN20180025 Packet Pg. 125 6.1.a Paradise Heights, LLC March 5, 2018 Groundwater ES-5839 Page 3 No groundwater seepage was observed during our fieldwork on January 7, 2018. Groundwater seepage rates and elevations fluctuate depending on many factors, including precipitation duration and intensity, the time of year, and soil conditions. In general, groundwater elevations and flow rates are higher during the winter, spring and early summer months. Geolo ical Hazards Assessment As part of this geotechnical engineering study, the referenced chapter of the Edmonds City Code (ECC) was reviewed. Per the ECC requirements, the following topics related to development plans and site conditions are addressed. Slope Reconnaissance During our fieldwork, we performed a visual slope reconnaissance of the steep slope area. The main focus of our reconnaissance was to identify signs of instability or erosion hazards along the site slopes. The typical instability indicators include features such as head scarps, tension cracks, hummocky terrain, groundwater seeps along the surface and erosion features such as gulleys and rills. During the slope reconnaissance, no signs of erosion or slope instability were observed. The slope is vegetated with large trees and ivy groundcover. In general, based on the slope reconnaissance, stability of the sloped areas within and adjacent to the property can be characterized as good. Erosion Hazard Areas — ECC 23.80.020.A. With respect to erosion hazard areas, section 23.80.020 of the ECC defines erosion hazards as "at least those areas identified by the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Natural Resources Conservation Service as having a "moderate to severe", "severe", or "very severe" rill and inter - rill erosion hazard. Erosion hazard areas are also those areas impacted by shoreland and/or stream bank erosion. Within the city of Edmonds, erosion hazard areas include: Those areas of the city of Edmonds containing soils that may experience severe to very severe erosion hazard. This group of soils includes, but is not limited to, the following when they occur on slopes of 15 percent or greater: a. Alderwood soils (15 to 25 percent slopes); b. Alderwood/Everett series (25 to 70 percent slopes), and; c. Everett series (15 to 25 percent slopes). 2. Coastal and stream erosion areas which are subject to the impacts from lateral erosion related to moving water such as stream channel migration and shoreline retreat; 3. Any area with slopes of 15 percent or greater and impermeable soils interbedded with granular soils and springs or ground water seepage, and; 4. Areas with significant visible evidence of ground water seepage, and which also include existing landslide deposits regardless of slope. Earth Solutions NW, LLC Attachment 15 - PLN20180025 Packet Pg. 126 6.1.a Paradise Heights, LLC March 5, 2018 ES-5839 Page 4 The on -site soils are generally consistent with Everett series soils. Based on the ECC definition, the steep slope areas within and adjacent to the property classify as erosion hazard areas. Construction of the proposed engineered retaining wall is expected to be sufficient for adequately managing and mitigating the erosion potential for this project. Landslide Hazard Areas — ECC 23.80.020.13. With respect to landslide hazard areas, section 23.80.020 of the ECC defines landslide hazard areas as "areas potentially subject to landslides based on a combination of geologic, topographic, and hydrologic factors. They include areas susceptible because of any combination of soil, slope (gradient), slope aspect, structure, hydrology, or other factors. Within the city of Edmonds, landslide hazard areas specifically include: 1. Areas of ancient or historic failures in Edmonds which include all areas within the earth subsidence and landslide hazard area as identified in the 1979 report of Robert Lowe Associates and amended by the 1985 report of GeoEngineers, Inc., and further discussed in the 2007 report by Landau Associates; 2. Coastal areas mapped as class U (unstable), UOS (unstable old slides) and URS (unstable recent slides) in the Department of Ecology Washington coastal atlas; 3. Areas designated as quaternary slumps, earthflows, mudflows, or landslides on maps published by the United States Geological Survey or Washington State Department of Natural Resources; 4. Any slope of 40 percent or steeper that exceeds a vertical height of 10 feet over a 25- foot horizontal run. Except for rockeries that have been engineered and approved by the engineer as having been built according to the engineered design, all other modified slopes (including slopes where there are breaks in slopes) meeting overall average steepness and height criteria should be considered potential landslide hazard areas; 5. Any slope with all three of the following characteristics: a. Slopes steeper than 15 percent; b. Hillsides intersecting geologic contacts with relatively permeable sediment overlying a relatively impermeable sediment, and; c. Springs or ground water seepage. 6. Any area potentially unstable as a result of rapid stream incision or stream bank erosion; 7. Any area located on an alluvial fan, presently subject to, or potentially subject to, inundation by debris flow or deposition of stream -transported sediments, and; 8. Any slopes that have been modified by past development activity that still meet the slope criteria. Earth Solutions NW, LLC Attachment 15 - PLN20180025 Packet Pg. 127 6.1.a Paradise Heights, LLC ES-5839 March 5, 2018 Page 5 Based on site observation and the referenced topographic survey, a north -descending steep slope with gradient in excess of 40 percent is located to north of the subject property; based on site observations, the steep slope area was likely over steepened by historic excavations made to construct Paradise Lane. Per the above definition of landslide hazard areas, the steep slope to the north of the subject property classifies as a potential landslide hazard area based on a slope gradient of 40 percent or steeper with a vertical relief of 10 feet or more. The overall stability of the site can be characterized as good and it is our opinion that the potential landslide hazard for the slope to the north of the site can be considered very low. Additionally, we understand grading for the proposed development will include construction of engineered retaining walls that will effectively eliminate the steep slope hazard. Mapping of Geologically Hazardous Areas — ECC 23.80.030 Review of available geologically hazardous areas mapping did not reveal geologically hazardous areas within or immediately adjacent to the subject site. Special Study and Report Requirements — ECC 23.80.050 A. This geotechnical engineering study and geological hazards assessment was completed by a professional engineer licensed in the state of Washington with experience analyzing geologic hazards throughout the Puget Sound region. B. 1. The project area includes the subject site as delineated in the referenced preliminary plans. 2. No further geologically hazardous areas are located within 200 feet of the property or will be affected by construction on the property. C. This geological hazards assessment included a field investigation and an assessment of geologic hazards. This geotechnical report has been prepared, stamped, and signed by a qualified professional. 1. It is our opinion the level of analysis completed for this geological hazards assessment is appropriate for the scale and scope of the project and scale of the geological hazard areas present. 2. A discussion of all geologically hazardous areas on the site and any geologically hazardous areas off site potentially impacted by the proposed project is provided in this report. 3. Based on the results of our study and on -site observations, the proposed project will not decrease slope stability or pose an unreasonable threat to persons or property either on or off site. These conclusions are based on the current conditions of the slope in question and proposed replacement of the slope with an engineered retaining wall. 4. This geological hazard assessment is provided as adequate information to comply with requirements of ECC geological hazards. 5. This geotechnical report generally follows the guidelines set forth in the Washington State Department of Licensing Guidelines for Preparing Engineering Geology Reports in Washington (2006). Earth Solutions NW, LLC Attachment 15 - PLN20180025 Packet Pg. 128 6.1.a Paradise Heights, LLC March 5, 2018 ES-5839 Page 6 6. It is our opinion a landslide hazard minimum building setback is not necessary, and erosion hazard mitigation recommendations are provided in this report. D. We are not aware of a previous study completed for the subject site. E. The mitigation recommendations include permanent solutions, such as construction of engineered retaining walls within the slope area in question and erosion control recommendations. F. This geological hazards assessment and geotechnical engineering study should be reviewed as part of the overall submittal package. 1. Please refer to preliminary plans prepared by Michel Construction, Inc. for the site plan a. The height of the slopes and slope gradients are discussed in this report and displayed within the preliminary plans. b. Springs, seeps, or other surface expressions of groundwater were not observed on or within 200 feet of the project area. c. No surface water runoff features were observed during our site visits. 2. a. Vegetative cover across the landslide hazard areas generally consists of non-native groundcover (i.e. ivy), shrubs, and large trees. b. Subsurface conditions are described in the Subsurface section of this report. c. Surface and groundwater conditions are discussed in previous sections of this report. Roughly two and one-half feet of fill was observed in TP-3. Based on current conditions and elevation changes present, it is evident that some degree of land modification has occurred within and adjacent to the potential landslide hazard areas. The potential landslide hazard areas were likely artificially steepened by excavations completed during construction of Paradise Lane. Local natural topography was likely more of a gradual consistent slope. d. The slopes within and adjacent to the subject site generally exhibit good overall stability. e. The slopes within and adjacent to the subject site are not characterized as bluffs and we do not anticipate a retreat of the slopes to occur. Based on the sand soils present on the site and no indications of groundwater, we would anticipate the run -out hazard of landslide debris to be confined to a distance of up to half the height of slope away from the toe. If such a landslide occurred, impacts of run -out on downslope properties or right-of-way would likely consist of a few feet of landslide debris covering the ground adjacent to the toe of the slope. Repair of the slide would likely require cleanup of debris and engineered reconstruction of the slope and/or construction of an engineered retaining wall at the toe of the slope; construction of the proposed engineered retaining wall will effectively mitigate this potential. It should be noted, based on the results of our study, likelihood of such a landslide event occurring adjacent to the subject site is very low and the proposed project will not increase the likelihood. Earth Solutions NW, LLC Attachment 15 - PLN20180025 Packet Pg. 129 6.1.a Paradise Heights, LLC March 5, 2018 ES-5839 Page 7 g. We believe this report meets the criteria of a critical areas report to a degree adequate with respect to the severity of the steep slope hazard. h. Recommendations for building siting limitations are provided in this report. Proposed surface and subsurface drainage includes collecting surface water from impermeable surfaces and directing them to infiltration systems located along the eastern side of the site. The proposed drainage design is engineered and located in a manner which utilizes the native sand soils and minimizes impacts to sloped areas. The site soils are susceptible to erosion if exposed to surface water runoff without the implementation of BMP measures. However, typical temporary and permanent BMP measures will effectively mitigate the erosion potential. 3. This geotechnical engineering study was prepared by a licensed engineer. a. Geotechnical design parameters are provided within this report. b. Drainage and subdrainage recommendations are provided within this report. c. Earthwork recommendations are provided within this report. d. Recommendations for mitigation of adverse site conditions are provided within this report, as necessary. G. It is our opinion the site erosion hazard areas should be considered stable. H. Based on the results of our study, the site does not contain any seismic hazard areas. Development Standards (General Requirements) — ECC 23.80.060 Based on the results of our geological hazards assessment, the proposed project will not increase the threat of the geological hazard to adjacent properties beyond predevelopment conditions, the proposed project will not adversely impact other critical areas, the proposed project is designed so that the hazard to the project is eliminated or mitigated to a level equal to or less than predevelopment conditions, and the project is certified as safe as designed under anticipated conditions. Development Standards (Specific Hazards) — ECC 23.80.070 A. 1. We believe that with the construction of the engineered retaining wall adjacent to Paradise Lane at the toe of the slope hazard area, any structure placed atop the wall will not be at risk for landslides for the design life of the structure. 2. Based on the results of our study, it is our opinion that a buffer is not necessary for the landslide hazard areas. The proposed project will include reducing the overall height of the landslide hazard area as well as construction of engineered retaining walls in the slope area. Earth Solutions NW, LLC Attachment 15 - PLN20180025 Packet Pg. 130 6.1.a Paradise Heights, LLC March 5, 2018 ES-5839 Page 8 3. The proposed project will include construction of engineered retaining walls within the slope hazard area, effectively removing any permanent hazard found on site. The alteration will include establishing permanent erosion control and drainage measures at the top of the landslide and erosion hazard areas. Provided the recommendations in this report and subsequent geotechnical recommendations are incorporated into the design and construction of the project, the proposed alteration will not increase surface water discharge or sedimentation to adjacent properties beyond predevelopment conditions, will not decrease slope stability on adjacent properties, and such alterations will not adversely impact other critical areas. 4. a. As part of this geological hazards assessment, we assessed the current slope conditions and consider them to be stable in their current condition and configuration. We do not feel it is necessary to perform full slope stability analysis within the landslide hazard, as construction of engineered retaining walls will mitigate the hazard area prior to foundation loading and construction; however, an ESNW representative should be on -site during wall construction to observe changes to the steep slope area. b. It is our opinion that the structures and improvements have been located and engineered in a manner which sufficiently mitigates impacts to geologically hazardous areas; ESNW should review any plan changes. c. Historic development of Paradise Lane likely altered the natural contour of the slopes. The proposed project will construct an engineered retaining wall within the slope area, effectively eliminating any slope hazard. d. The structures and improvements have been located and engineered in a manner that effectively eliminates the most critical portions of the site by proposing engineered retaining walls to replace the artificially steepened slopes. e. The proposed development will not result in greater risk or a need for increased buffers on neighboring properties. f. Based on our study, building setback are not necessary. 5. We did not observe vegetation within the subject site which should be retained to maintain site and slope stability. 6. It is our opinion that this site should not be restricted to seasonal clearing and grading work. This opinion is based on the relatively small scope of the project and predominantly sandy soils, which are not as moisture sensitive as glacial till, of the geological hazard areas. 7. We are not aware of proposed point discharges. Earth Solutions NW, LLC Attachment 15 - PLN20180025 Packet Pg. 131 6.1.a Paradise Heights, LLC March 5, 2018 Analysis of Proposal ES-5839 Page 9 The proposed development will involve demolition of the existing single-family residential structure and construction of three new multi -family residential structures. Based on the referenced site plans, the grading will involve minor cuts to establish level building pad areas; we understand that an engineered retaining wall will be constructed at the base of the slope hazard area adjacent to Paradise Lane at the north edge of the site. The proposed project will eliminate the slope hazard area without creating any new geological hazards adjacent to the property. These determinations are based on the relatively small extent of the previously modified steeply sloped areas, stable nature of the site soils, and the construction of an engineered wall to retain the site grades. DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS General Based on the results of our study, construction of the proposed residential structures at the subject site is feasible from a geotechnical standpoint. The primary geotechnical considerations associated with the proposed development include foundation support, temporary excavations, retaining walls, infiltration and drainage, and the suitability of the on -site soils for use as structural fill. The proposed residential structures can be supported on a conventional foundation system bearing on competent native soil, recompacted native soil, or structural fill. Competent soils suitable for support of foundations should be encountered beginning at a depth of roughly two feet below existing grades across the majority of the site. Slab -on -grade floors should be supported on dense native soil, re -compacted native soil, or structural fill. Where loose, organic or other unsuitable materials are encountered at or below the footing subgrade elevation, the material should be removed and replaced with structural fill, as necessary. This study has been prepared for the exclusive use of Paradise Heights, LLC and their representatives. No warranty, expressed or implied, is made. This study has been prepared in a manner consistent with the level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by other members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions in this area. Site Preparation and Earthwork Based on the referenced site plans and given the existing topography, we anticipate grading for the project will involve cuts of up to about four feet to establish building pad and foundation subgrade alignments. Silt fencing and temporary erosion control measures should be placed along the perimeter of the site prior to beginning grading activities. Earth Solutions NW, LLC Attachment 15 - PLN20180025 Packet Pg. 132 6.1.a Paradise Heights, LLC March 5, 2018 Temporary Erosion Control ES-5839 Page 10 Temporary construction entrances, consisting of at least six inches of quarry spalls, can be considered in order to minimize off -site soil tracking and to provide a temporary road surface. Silt fences should be placed along the margins of the property. Interceptor swales and a temporary sediment pond maybe necessary for control of surface water during construction. Erosion control measures should conform to the Washington State Department of Ecology (DOE) and City of Edmonds standards. In -Situ Soils From a geotechnical standpoint, the soils encountered at the test pit locations are generally suitable for use as structural fill. However, successful use of the on -site soils will largely be dictated by the moisture content of the soils at the time of placement and compaction. The site soils were generally in a damp condition at the time of the exploration on January 7, 2018. Based on the conditions encountered during our fieldwork, the site soils generally have a low sensitivity to moisture. During periods of dry weather, the on -site soils should generally be suitable for use as structural fill, provided the moisture content is at or near the optimum level at the time of placement. If the on -site soils cannot be successfully compacted, the use of an imported soil may be necessary. Imported soil intended for use as structural fill should consist of a well -graded granular soil with a moisture content that is at or near the optimum level. During wet weather conditions, imported soil intended for use as structural fill should consist of a well - graded granular soil with a fines content of 5 percent or less defined as the percent passing the Number 200 sieve, based on the minus three-quarter inch fraction. Structural Fill Structural fill is defined as compacted soil placed in foundation, slab -on -grade, and roadway areas. Fills placed to construct permanent slopes and throughout retaining wall and utility trench backfill areas are also considered structural fill. Soils placed in structural areas should be placed in loose lifts of 12 inches or less and compacted to a relative compaction of 95 percent, based on the laboratory maximum dry density as determined by the Modified Proctor Method (ASTM D- 1557). For soil placed in utility trenches underlying structural areas, compaction requirements are dictated by the local city, county, or utility district, and in general are specified as 95 percent relative compaction. Earth Solutions NW, LLC Attachment 15 - PLN20180025 Packet Pg. 133 6.1.a Paradise Heights, LLC March 5, 2018 Excavations and Slopes ES-5839 Page 11 The native soils encountered in the upper approximately nine feet of the test pit locations consist of poorly graded sands in a dense condition. Temporary slopes within this layer should maintain a gradient of no steeper than 1 H:1 V. If groundwater is present within acute the minimum gradient of a slope should be increased to 1.5HA V. The presence of perched groundwater may cause caving of the temporary slopes due to hydrostatic pressure. ESNW should observe site excavations to confirm the soil type and allowable slope inclination are appropriate for the soil exposed by the excavation. If the recommended temporary slope inclination cannot be achieved, temporary shoring may be necessary to support excavations. Permanent slopes should maintain a gradient of 2HAV, or flatter, and should be planted with vegetation to enhance stability and to minimize erosion. A representative of ESNW should observe temporary and permanent slopes to confirm the slope inclinations are suitable for the exposed soil conditions, and to provide additional excavation and slope recommendations, as necessary. Foundations The proposed residential structures can be supported on a conventional foundation system bearing on competent native soil, recompacted native soil, or structural fill. Competent soils suitable for support of foundations should be encountered beginning at a depth of roughly two feet below existing grades across the majority of the site. Where loose, organic or other unsuitable materials are encountered at or below the footing subgrade elevation, the material should be removed and replaced with structural fill, as necessary. Provided the structures will be supported as described above, the following parameters can be used for design of the new foundations: u Allowable soil bearing capacity 2,500 psf w Passive earth pressure 300 pcf (equivalent fluid) Coefficient of friction 0.40 A one-third increase in the allowable soil bearing capacity can be assumed for short-term wind and seismic loading conditions. With structural loading as expected, total settlement in the range of one inch is anticipated, with differential settlement of about one-half inch. The majority of the settlements should occur during construction, as dead loads are applied. Earth Solutions NW, LLC Attachment 15 - PLN20180025 Packet Pg. 134 6.1.a Paradise Heights, LLC March 5, 2018 Seismic Considerations ES-5839 Page 12 The 2015 IBC recognizes ASCE for seismic site class definitions. If the project will be permitted under the 2015 IBC, in accordance with Table 20.3-1 of ASCE, Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures, Site Class D, should be used for design. In our opinion, the site is not susceptible to liquefaction. The soil relative density and the absence of an established shallow groundwater table are the primary bases for this opinion. Slab -On -Grade Floors Slab -on -grade floors should be supported on a firm and unyielding subgrade consisting of competent native soil or at least 12 inches of structural fill. Unstable or yielding areas of the subgrade should be recompacted or overexcavated and replaced with suitable structural fill prior to construction of the slab. A capillary break consisting of a minimum of four inches of free - draining crushed rock or gravel should be placed below the slab. The free -draining material should have a fines content of 5 percent or less defined as the percent passing the Number 200 sieve, based on the minus three-quarters inch fraction. In areas where slab moisture is undesirable, installation of a vapor barrier below the slab should be considered. If used, the vapor barrier should consist of a material specifically designed to function as a vapor barrier and should be installed in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. Retaining Walls Engineered retaining walls are proposed to eliminate the slope within the slope hazard area. The following parameters can be used for retaining wall design: • Active earth pressure (yielding condition) ■ At -rest earth pressure (restrained condition) o Traffic surcharge (passenger vehicles) Passive earth pressure • Coefficient of friction • Seismic surcharge *Where H equals retained height 35 pcf 55 pcf 70 psf (rectangular distribution) 300 pcf 0.40 6H* Where sloping or other surcharge conditions will be present, supplement recommendations and design earth pressure values should be provided by ESNW. Drainage should be provided behind retaining walls such that hydrostatic pressures do not develop. If drainage is not provided, hydrostatic pressures should be included in the wall design. Earth Solutions NK LLC Attachment 15 - PLN20180025 Packet Pg. 135 6.1.a Paradise Heights, LLC ES-5839 March 5, 2018 Page 13 Retaining walls should be backfilled with free -draining material that extends along the height of the wall, and a distance of at least 18 inches behind the wall. The upper one foot of the wall backfill can consist of a less permeable soil, if desired. A perforated drain pipe should be placed along the base of the wall, and should be connected to an approved discharge location. A typical retaining wall drainage detail is provided as Plate 3. Drainage Groundwater seepage was not observed during our fieldwork on January 7, 2018. Groundwater seepage is possible in site excavations, particularly in the winter, spring and early summer months. Temporary measures to control groundwater seepage and surface water runoff during construction will likely involve passive elements such as interceptor trenches and sumps, as necessary. Surface water should not be allowed to runoff over sloped areas and should not be allowed to pond near the top of sloped areas or retaining structures. Surface grades must be designed to direct water away from buildings. The grade adjacent to buildings should be sloped away from the buildings at a gradient of at least 2 percent for a horizontal distance of four feet or more as setbacks allow. In our opinion, perimeter footing drains should be installed at or below the invert of the building footings. A typical footing drain detail is provided on Plate 4 of this report. Infiltration Evaluation We understand drywells, trenches or other methods will be utilized for on -site infiltration. For design, the long-term infiltration rate was evaluated using a Small-scale Pilot Infiltration Test (PIT) completed at a depth of three feet in TP-3. Based on consistent nature of the upper outwash soils, it is our opinion one PIT is sufficient; once infiltration depths and locations are determined, we should reevaluate the need for additional testing. Table 3.3.1 of the referenced DOE Manual provides criteria for estimating the long-term infiltration rate based on measured rates and applicable correction factors. The following long term infiltration rate was calculated using the following equation and correction factors: K design rate = K measured rate X CFT 49 Measured infiltration rate Kmeasured = 120 in/hr ■ Site variability; number of locations tested CFI = 0.33 Test method CFt = 0.50 Degree of influent control to prevent siltation Urn = 0.90 Total correction factor CFT = 0.15 Calculated Long Term Infiltration Rate* TP-3 = 18 in/hr "Per Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington, August, 2012. Chapter 3.3.4 Earth Solutions NW, LLC Attachment 15 - PLN20180025 Packet Pg. 136 6.1.a Paradise Heights, LLC March 5, 2018 ES-5839 Page 14 We recommend the proposed infiltration systems be located with a setback of at least 25 feet from the top of slope hazard area (and proposed retaining wall upon completion) to the north of the subject site. The geotechnical engineer should observe the excavations for the proposed infiltration systems to confirm soil conditions at the time of construction. We recommend an emergency overflow provision be included in the infiltration system design. If an overflow is not incorporated, we recommend reducing the design infiltration rate by half. Low Impact Development The following table provides our evaluation and recommendations regarding low impact development BMPs for the proposed project: BMP T5.13: Post -construction soil quality and death Volume V, Chapter 5 T5.30: Full dispersion (Volume V, Chapter 5) T5.10A: Downspout full infiltration systems (Volume III, Chapter 3) Bioretention (Volume V, Chapter 7) T5.1013: Downspout dispersion systems (Volume III, Chapter 3) T5.10C: Perforated stub -out connections (Volume III. Chapter 3) Other Hard Surfaces T5.30: Full dispersion (Volume V, Chapter 5) T5.15: Permeable pavement (Volume V, Chapter 5) Bioretention (Volume V, Chapter 7) T5.12: Sheet flow dispersion T5.11: Concentrated flow dispersion (Volume V, Chapter 5) Viable? I Limitations or Infeasibility Criteria Yes IConsidered infeasible on slopes of 33 percent or greater. T5.30: Dispersion is not recommended near the Yes* slope hazard area/proposed retaining wall of the site. T5.10A: A design infiltration of 18 inches per Yes hour should be used for preliminary design. Must be setback at least 25 feet from proposed retaining wall. A design infiltration of 18 inches per hour should Yes be used for design. Must be setback at least 25 feet from proposed retaining wall. Yes* Dispersion is not recommended near the slope hazard area/proposed retaining wall of the site. Yes No limitations. Yes* Dispersion is not recommended near the slope hazard area/proposed retaining wall of the site. Near -surface soils generally have a higher fines content and a design infiltration rate of 4.5 inch Yes per hour should be used for design of permeable pavement. Must be setback at least 25 feet from ro osed retaining wall. A design infiltration of 18 inches per hour should Yes be used for design. Must be setback at least 25 feet from proposed retaining wall. Yes* Dispersion is not recommended near the slope hazard area/proposed retaining wall of the site. *If dispersion is utilized all downspout areas should maintain at least a 25-foot buffer from the proposed retaining wall area. Dispersion is recommended to lead south or east boundaries of the site property where site topography Is relatively level. Earth Solutions NW, LLC Attachment 15 - PLN20180025 Packet Pg. 137 6.1.a Paradise Heights, LLC March 5, 2018 Utilit Trench Support and Backfill ES-5839 Page 15 In our opinion, the soils observed at the test pit locations are generally suitable for support of utilities. In general, the soils observed at the test pit locations may not be suitable for use as structural backfill in the utility trench excavations, unless the soil is at or near the optimum moisture content at the time of placement and compaction. Moisture conditioning of the soils may be necessary at some locations prior to use as structural fill. Utility trench backfill should be placed and compacted to the specifications of structural fill provided in this report, or to the applicable requirements of the City of Edmonds. Pavement Sections The performance of site pavements is largely related to the condition of the underlying subgrade. To ensure adequate pavement performance, the subgrade should be in a firm and unyielding condition when subjected to proofrolling with a loaded dump truck. Structural fill in pavement areas should be compacted to the specifications detailed in the Site Preparation and Earthwork section of this report. It is possible that soft, wet, or otherwise unsuitable subgrade areas may still exist after base grading activities. Areas of unsuitable or yielding subgrade conditions may require remedial measures such as overexcavation and replacement with structural fill or thicker crushed rock sections prior to pavement. For relatively lightly loaded pavements subjected to automobiles and occasional truck traffic, the following sections can be considered for preliminary design: Two inches of hot mix asphalt (HMA) placed over four inches of crushed rock base (CRB), or; • Two inches of HMA placed over three inches of asphalt treated base (ATB). The HMA, CRB and ATB materials should conform to WSDOT specifications. LIMITATIONS The recommendations and conclusions provided in this geotechnical engineering study are professional opinions consistent with the level of care and skill that is typical of other members in the profession currently practicing under similar conditions in this area. A warranty is not expressed or implied. Variations in the soil and groundwater conditions observed at the test locations may exist, and may not become evident until construction. ESNW should reevaluate the conclusions in this geotechnical engineering study if variations are encountered. Additional Services ESNW should have an opportunity to review the final design with respect to the geotechnical recommendations provided in this report. ESNW should also be retained to provide testing and consultation services during construction. Earth Solutions NW, LLC Attachment 15 - PLN20180025 Packet Pg. 138 6.1.a Reference: Snohomish County, Washington Map 454 By The Thomas Guide Rand McNally 32nd Edition 1 H1 AAdF i10riF VoliIH_?� i w NORTH i 14 P, Vicinity Map 546 Paradise Lane Edmonds, Washington NOTE: This plate may contain areas of color. ESNW cannot be responsible for any subsequent misinterpretation of the information Drwn. CAM Date 02/13/2018 Proj. No. 5839 resulting from black & white reproductions of this plate. Checked SES Date Feb. 2018 Plate 1 Attachment 15 - PLN20180025 Packet Pg. 139 6.1.a t Building A '9 TP-2 TP) \ Buil g B \ \ \\ TP-3 1 Building t — r f LEGEND TP-1 I Approximate Location of — ■ — ESNW Test Pit, Proj. No. NORTH ES-5839, Feb. 2018 Subject Site Proposed Building Existing Building (To be Removed) NOT - TO -SCALE NOTE: The graphics shown on this plate are not intended for design purposes or precise scale measurements, but only to illustrate the approximate test locations relative to the approximate locations of existing and / or proposed site features. The information illustrated is largely based on data provided by the client at the time of our study. ESNW cannot be responsible for subsequent design changes or interpretation of the data by others. Earth Solulio3>Is N W Lu Test Pit Location Plan 546 Paradise Lane Edmonds, Washington NOTE: This plate may contain areas of color. ESNW cannot be responsible for any subsequent misinterpretation of the information Drwn. CAM Date 02/13/2018 Proj. No. 5839 resulting from black & white reproductions of this plate. Checked SES Date Feb. 2018 Plate 2 Attachment 15 - PLN20180025 Packet Pg. 140 6.1.a 18" Min. ° 00 ° o0 ° e0 0 o0 ° °° ° °°0. o°p°0 0° ° ° ° 00.0 °o o ° ° o ems0 —0 o° o° '0° o .aOo00 8° 00 ° a o ° 0 ° ° a 0 ° O° 0° n o �� °0 0 °0 0 0. -0 o 00 4°°0 0a° o00o p 00 00 00 00 �0° o o�° ° o� o°°e oe oo 8 � a ° o °00 G °oo eP�d 0.0 0 0 o 0 p o 0 °�° °0 0° �00°0 CP 0 ° o ° °. NOTES: + Free -draining Backfill should consist of soil having less than 5 percent fines. Percent passing No. 4 sieve should be 25 to 75 percent. + Sheet Drain may be feasible in lieu of Free -draining Backfill, per ESNW recommendations. + Drain Pipe should consist of perforated, rigid PVC Pipe surrounded with 1-inch Drain Rock. LEGEND: o0 0 0.-°0 00 Free -draining Structural Backfill • S•ti.1•ti .,'.,•. f. f. ,r � �tirti 1-inch Drain Rock Structural Fill Perforated Rigid Drain Pipe (Surround in Drain Rock) SCHEMATIC ONLY - NOT TO SCALE NOT CONSTRUCTION DRAWING Earth Solutions NW LLc RETAINING WALL DRAINAGE DETAIL 546 Paradise Lane Edmonds, Washington Drwn. CAM Date 02/13/2018 Proj. No. 5839 Checked SES Date Feb. 2018 Plate 3 Attachment 15 - PLN20180025 Packet Pg. 141 1 6.1.a Perforated Rigid Drain Pipe (Surround in Drain Rock) NOTES: • Do NOT tie roof downspouts to Footing Drain. • Surface Seal to consist of 12" of less permeable, suitable soil. Slope away from building. LEGEND: Surface Seal: native soil or other low -permeability material. •z••.•ti. 115, ti•a•ti•ti• 1-inch Drain Rock r•r•r•r•r SCHEMATIC ONLY - NOT TO SCALE NOTA CONSTRUCTION DRAWING L thutionsW 11C FOOTING DRAIN DETAIL 546 Paradise Lane Edmonds, Washington Drwn. CAM I Date 02/13/20181 Proj. No. 5839 Checked SES Date Feb. 2018 Plate 4 Attachment 15 - PLN20180025 Packet Pg. 142 6.1.a Appendix A Subsurface Exploration ES-6839 The subsurface conditions at the site were explored by excavating two test pits at the approximate locations illustrated on Plate 2 of this report. The test pit logs are provided in this Appendix. The subsurface exploration was completed on February 7, 2018. The test pits were excavated to a maximum depth of nine feet below existing grades. Logs of the test pits advanced by ESNW are presented in Appendix A. The final logs represent the interpretations of the field logs and the results of laboratory analyses. The stratification lines on the logs represent the approximate boundaries between soil types. In actuality, the transitions may be more gradual. Earth Solutions NW, LLC Attachment 15 - PLN20180025 Packet Pg. 143 6.1.a Earth Solutions NWLLC SOIL CLASSIFICATION CHART MAJOR DIVISIONS SYMBOLS TYPICAL DESCRIPTIONS GRAPH LETTER GRAVEL AND CLEAN GRAVELS '�� '� '" . a GW WELL-GRADED GRAVELS, GRAVEL - SAND MIXTURES, LITTLE OR NO FINES 41 U° °3 -bJ o pip p GP POORLY -GRADED GRAVELS, GRAVEL - SAND MIXTURES, LITTLE OR NO FINES GRAVELLY SOILS (LITTLE OR NO FINES) COARSE GRAINED SOILS MORETHAN50% OF COARSE GRAVELS WITH FINES GM SILTY GRAVELS, GRAVEL -SAND - SILT MIXTURES FRACTION 4'3� CLAYEY GRAVELS, GRAVEL - SAND - CLAY MIXTURES RETAINED ON NO. 4 SIEVE (APPRECIABLEGC AMOUNT OF FINES) MORE THAN 50%SAND OF MATERIAL IS AND CLEAN SANDSSW WELL-GNDS SANDS, LITTLE SA NO F GRAVELLY SP POORLY -GRADED SANDS, GRAVELLY SAND, LITTLE OR NO FINES LARGERTHAN NO. 200 SIEVE SIZE SANDY SOILS (LITTLE OR NO FINES) SANDS WITH FINES 4. SM SILTY SANDS, SAND MIXTURESMORE MIXTURES THAN 50% OF COARSE FRACTION Sr+ llr� CLAYEY SANDS, SAND - CLAY MIXTURES PASSING ON NO. 4 SIEVE (APPRECIABLE AMOUNT OF FINES) INORGANIC SILTS AND VERY FINE ML SANDS, ROCK FLOUR, SILTY OR CLAYEY FINE SANDS OR CLAYEY SILTS WITH SLIGHT PLASTICITY FINE GRAINED SOILS SILTS LIQUID LIMIT AND LESS THAN 50 CLAYS CL INORGANIC CLAYS OF LOW TO MEDIUM PLASTICITY, GRAVELLY CLAYS, SANDY CLAYS, SILTY I CLAYS, LEAN CLAYS OL ORGANIC SILTS AND ORGANIC SILTY CLAYS OF LOW PLASTICITY MORE THAN 50% OF MATERIAL IS SMALLER THAN NO. 200 SIEVE MH INORGANIC SILTS, MICACEOUS OR DIATOMACEOUS FINE SAND OR SILTY SOILS SIZE SILTS LIQUID LIMIT AND CLAYS GREATER THAN 50 CH INORGANIC CLAYS OF HIGH PLASTICITY OH ORGANIC CLAYS OF MEDIUM TO HIGH PLASTICITY, ORGANIC SILTS HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS PT PEAT, HUMUS, SWAMP SOILS WITH HIGH ORGANIC CONTENTS DUAL SYMBOLS are used to indicate borderline soil classifications. The discussion in the text of this report is necessary for a proper understanding of the nature of the material presented in the attached logs. Attachment 15 - PLN20180025 Packet Pg. 144 6.1.a Earth Solutions NW TEST PIT NUMBER TP-1 1605 - 136th Place N.E., Suite 201 Bellevue, Washington 98005 PAGE 1 OF 1 Telephone: 425-449-4704 Fax: 425-449-4711 PROJECT NUMBER ES-5839 PROJECT NAME 546 Paradise Lane DATE STARTED 2/7118 COMPLETED 217/18 GROUND ELEVATION 265 ft TEST PIT SIZE EXCAVATION CONTRACTOR NW Excavating GROUND WATER LEVELS: EXCAVATION METHOD AT TIME OF EXCAVATION - LOGGED BY SES CHECKED BY HTW AT END OF EXCAVATION -- NOTES Depth of Topsoil & Sod 6" AFTER EXCAVATION -- a 1 0 �W w 0° TESTS O MATERIAL DESCRIPTION a� Qz Cn a fPSL =' '' _ p.5 TOPSOIL 2sa.; Brown poorly graded SAND with gravel, medium dense, damp MC = 4.20% -becomes gray -caving from 2' to BOH MC = 3.60% 5 SP MC = 4.00% -becomes dense 9.0 -becomes moist 256.f MC = 9.20% _ Test pit terminated at 9.0 feet below existing grade. No groundwater encountered during excavation. Caving observed from 2.0 feet to BOH. Bottom of test pit at 9.0 feet. 3 t 0 a 0 L Attachment 15 - PLN20180025 Packet Pg. 145 6.1.a Earth Solutions NW TEST PIT NUMBER TP-2 1805 -136th Place N.E., Suite 201 Bellevue, Washington 98005 PAGE 1 OF 1 Telephone: 425-449-4704 Fax: 425-449-4711 PROJECT NUMBER ES-5839 PROJECT NAME 546 Paradise Lane DATE STARTED 2/7118 COMPLETED 2!7118 GROUND ELEVATION 265 ft TEST PIT SIZE EXCAVATION CONTRACTOR NW Excavating GROUND WATER LEVELS: EXCAVATION METHOD AT TIME OF EXCAVATION --- LOGGED BY SES CHECKED BY HTW AT END OF EXCAVATION NOTES Depth of Topsoil &.Sod 3": grass AFTER EXCAVATION — r W W� o i � + TESTS 0 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION a z Icri j C� < 0 II TPSL' •• al---_ TOPSOIL 2041 Brown poorly graded SAND with silt and gravel, medium dense, damp _ MC = 8.60% Fines = 5.00% [USDA Classification: very gravelly coarse SAND] SP- - - - MC = 3.50% I SM -becomes gray 5 I MC = 3.40% S S �� 5 Test pit terminated at 5.5 feet below existing grade. No groundwater encountered during excavation. No caving observed. Bottom of test pit at 5.5 feet. 1 Q Attachment 15 - PLN20180025 Packet Pg. 146 6.1.a Earth Solutions NW TEST PIT NUMBER TP-3 1805 - 136th Place N.E., Suite 201 Bellevue, Washington 98006 PAGE 1 OF 1 Telephone: 425-449-4704 Fax: 425-449-4711 PROJECT NUMBER _ E$-5839 PROJECT NAME 546 Paradise Lane DATE STARTED 2/7/18 COMPLETED 217/18 GROUND ELEVATION 265 ft TEST PIT SIZE EXCAVATION CONTRACTOR NW Excavaling GROUND WATER LEVELS: EXCAVATION METHOD AT TIME OF EXCAVATION --- LOGGED BY SES CHECKED BY HTW AT END OF EXCAVATION NOTES Surface Conditions: grass AFTER EXCAVATION -- W _ HW N U T a iK _j ca 2 TESTS a. 0 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION W d7) QZ U v5 0 Brown poorly graded SAND, medium dense, damp (Fill) SP MC = 3.60% -caving to 8' _ 262 2.5 Gray poorly graded SAND with gravel, medium dense, damp -infiltration test at 3' SP MC = 10.60% Fines = 3.70% [USDA Classification: very gravelly coarse SAND] B.0 -water from infiltration test mounding on till layer, groundwater seepage at 8' SM Gray silty SAND with gravel, dense, damp (Unwealhered Till) 5 $'$ MC = 11.20% 1-moderately cemented r Test pit terminated at 8.5 feet below existing grade. Groundwater seepage encountered at 8.0 feet during excavation. Caving observed from 2.0 to 8.0 feet. Bottom of test pit at 8.5 feet. Q Attachment 15 - PLN20180025 Packet Pg. 147 Earth Solutions NW 1805 - 136th Place N.E., Suite 201 Bellevue, Washington 98005 Telephone: 425-449-4704 Fax: 425-449-4711 PROJECT NUMBER ES-5839 DATE STARTED 2/7/18 COMPLETED 2/7/18 EXCAVATION CONTRACTOR NW Excavating EXCAVATION METHOD LOGGED BY SES CHECKED BY HTW NOTES Depth_ of Topsoil & Sod 12": duff W _ W N U o _j g TESTS (6 S (7 J Qz O N 0 5 I I FL MC = 3.90% MC = 3.90% MC = 11.20% Fines = 18.50% SP SM TEST PIT NUMBER TP-4 PAGE 1 OF 1 _ PROJECT NAME 546 Paradise Lane GROUND ELEVATION 265 ft TEST PIT SIZE GROUND WATER LEVELS: AT TIME OF EXCAVATION AT END OF EXCAVATION -- AFTER EXCAVATION — MATERIAL DESCRIPTION Dark brown TOPSOIL, roots to 2' 1.0 _ Brown poorly graded SAND with gravel, medium dense, damp -caving to 8' -becomes gray 257-01 Gray silty SAND with gravel, dense to very dense, damp (Unweathered Till) -moderately cemented [USDA Classification:gravelly loamy SAND) Test pit terminated at 9.0 feet 4elow existing grade. No groundwater encountered during excavation. Caving observed from 2.0 to 8.0 feet. Bottom of test pit at 9.0 feet. Attachment 15 - PLN20180025 Packet Pg. 148 6.1.a Appendix B Laboratory Test Results ES-5839 Earth Solutions NW, LLC N E 7 E O C O N t 2 N N R L Q. d t 3 O a m L LO N O O CO T O N Z J IL r c m E z Q Attachment 15 - PLN20180025 Packet Pg. 149 6.1.a Earth Solutions Nliv, LLC 1805 - .- ... PL N.E., Suite 201 Bellevue, WA 98005 Telephone: 425-449-4704 FOR Fax: 425-449-4711 GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION Mill I I lismilill 0 111 1 NO 1110 III MINE 011111111 lmmiii INN INN III1■IYYIII�� 1moll�III � in � � � . 11 ■ 1 11 ■� 1NEII ■ III solillin Ell 11 0 HE NNE ��IOI�IIIII��611�mIAiiiiiio ,11�! NII■■ Specimen Identification Glum Attachment 15 - PLN20180025 Packet Pg. 150 6.1.a Report Distribution ES-5839 EMAIL ONLY Paradise Heights, LLC 24144 East Greystone Lane Woodway, Washington 98020 Attention: Mr. John Rettenmier Earth Solutions NK LLC Attachment 15 - PLN20180025 Packet Pg. 151 7.1 Architectural Design Board Agenda Item Meeting Date: 08/1/2018 Edmonds-Woodway High School Synthetic Turf Conversion Staff Lead: Mike Clugston Department: Planning Division Prepared By: Mike Clugston Background/History The Edmonds School District No. 15 (District) is proposing to upgrade the existing baseball and soccer fields along with the tennis courts at Edmonds-Woodway High School. Phase I of the proposed project includes a relocated storage building and three storage containers north of the baseball field. Also proposed is an area for javelin and discus, a synthetic turf multipurpose baseball field with football/soccer field (and associated lighting) and bullpens. In addition, four tennis courts (and associated lighting) are proposed east of the baseball field. Three batting cages are proposed south of the tennis courts. A portion of two tennis courts directly north and one tennis court east of the existing baseball field would be demolished to accommodate the improvements. If additional funding becomes available, Phase II of the project would include the installation of an unlighted natural turf football and soccer field west of the proposed baseball field; separate land use and building permits would be required for that work. There is currently a moratorium on the use of crumb rubber as infill material on publicly owned athletic fields such as this through August 8, 2018 (Ordinance 4097). The field infill material is not part of this review nor any of the associated land use permits. The infill material is being reviewed for consistency with stormwater and related code requirements in building permit BLD20180708. Staff Recommendation This design review is consolidated with a conditional use permit (PLN20180015) and two variances (PLN20180016 and PLN20180017) in accordance with ECDC 20.01.002. The CUP is required for playfield lighting and structures between 25' and 60' tall (baseball backstop and fencing and light poles at the tennis courts). The first variance is for increased height to allow for light poles at the baseball field taller than 60' (70' - 90' are proposed). The second variance is for a reduced setback for a covered batting cage structure near 216th Street. Because this is a consolidated review involving public variances, the decision -making process in ECDC 17.00.030.0 is used. The ADB first holds a public meeting (no public comment will be accepted) and makes a recommendation on the design of the project to the Hearing Examiner. The Examiner will then hold a public hearing on the design and three associated land use permits and, rather than issuing a decision, make a recommendation to City Council. Council will conduct a closed -record review of the record established by the Hearing Examiner and issue the final decision on all four permits. Based on the findings, analysis, conclusions, and attachments with the staff report, staff suggests that Packet Pg. 152 7.1 the ADB recommend approval of the design of the proposed Edmonds-Woodway High School Synthetic Turf Conversion under file number PLN20180014. Narrative Because the school site is zoned Public (P), the Architectural Design Board must review the design of the proposed improvements ["...each public use will undergo extensive review by the ADB in light of its relationship to its surrounding neighbors..." Section 16.80.030 of the Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC)]. There are few specific design standards for a redevelopment project like this but the code does contain design guidance applicable to certain elements such as lighting and landscaping. Refer to the staff report and attachments for a complete discussion regarding the design review. Attachments: PLN20180014 staff report Att 1 - Application Att 2 - Applicant narrative Att 3 - SEPA documentation Att 4 - Notice materials Att 5 - Technical comments Att 6 - Master plan Att 7 - Photos of similar projects Att 8 - Photo simulations Att 9 - project plans Packet Pg. 153 7.1.a ,11C. 189\3 CITY OF EDMONDS 121 5th Avenue North, Edmonds WA 98020 Phone: 425.771.0220 • Fax: 425.771.0221 • Web: www.edmondswa.gov DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT • PLANNING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION REPORT TO THE ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN BOARD Project: Edmonds-Woodway High School Synthetic Turf Conversion File Number: PLN20180014 Date of Report: July 25, 2018 Staff Contact: - /V Mike Clugston, AICP, Senior Planner ADB Meeting: Wednesday —August 1, 2018 at 7:00 P.M. Edmonds Public Safety Complex: Council Chambers 250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds WA 98020 I. PROJECT PROPOSAL The Edmonds School District No. 15 (District) is proposing to upgrade the existing baseball and soccer fields along with the tennis courts at Edmonds-Woodway High School. Phase I of the proposed project includes a relocated storage building and three storage containers north of the baseball field. Also proposed is an area for javelin and discus, a synthetic turf multipurpose baseball field with football/soccer field (and associated lighting) and bullpens. In addition, four tennis courts (and associated lighting) are proposed east of the baseball field. Three batting cages are proposed south of the tennis courts. A portion of two tennis courts directly north and one tennis court east of the existing baseball field would be demolished to accommodate the improvements. If additional funding becomes available, Phase II of the project would include the installation of an unlighted natural turf football and soccer field west of the proposed baseball field; separate land use and building permits would be required for that work. II. FINDINGS, ANALYSIS & CONCLUSIONS A. GENERAL INFORMATION Because the school site is zoned Public (P), the Architectural Design Board must review the design of the proposed improvements ["...each public use will undergo extensive review by the ADB in light of its relationship to its surrounding neighbors..." Section 16.80.030 of the Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC)]. There are few specific design standards for a Packet Pg. 154 7.1.a Edmonds-Woodway High School Synthetic Turf Conversion PLN20180014 redevelopment project like this but the code does contain design guidance applicable to certain elements such as lighting and landscaping. This design review is consolidated with a conditional use permit (PLN20180015) and two variances (PLN20180016 and PLN20180017) in accordance with ECDC 20.01.002. The CUP is required for playfield lighting and structures between 25' and 60' tall (baseball backstop and fencing and light poles at the tennis courts). The first variance is for increased height to allow for light poles at the baseball field taller than 60' (70' - 90' are proposed). The second variance is for a reduced setback for a covered batting cage structure near 2161h Street. Because this is a consolidated review involving public variances, the decision -making process in ECDC 17.00.030.0 is used. The ADB first holds a public meeting (no public comment will be accepted) and makes a recommendation on the design of the project to the Hearing Examiner. The Examiner will then hold a public hearing on the design and three associated land use permits and, rather than issuing a decision, make a recommendation to City Council. Council will conduct a closed -record review of the record established by the Hearing Examiner and issue the final decision on all four permits. It should be noted that there is currently a moratorium on the use of crumb rubber as infill material on publicly owned athletic fields such as this through August 8, 2018 (Ordinance 4097). The field infill material is not part of this review nor any of the associated land use permits. The infill material is being reviewed for consistency with stormwater and related code requirements in building permit BLD20180708. The following Attachments are included with this report: 1. Land use application 2. Applicant's narrative 3. SEPA documentation 4. Letter of complete application and public notice documentation for design meeting 5. Technical comments 6. Edmonds-Woodway High School Master Plan 7. Photos from similar athletic field projects 8. Photo -simulations of the proposal 9. Project plans, May 14, 2018 B. SEPA THRESHOLD DETERMINATION The Edmonds School District acted as lead agency for SEPA review. A determination of nonsignificance for the project was issued on June 11, 2018 (Attachment 3). No comments or appeals were received. C. NOTICE A "Notice of Application" and separate "Notice of Public Meeting" were published in the Herald Newspaper, posted at the subject site, as well as the Public Safety Complex, Community Development Department, and the Library on April 16 and July 18, 2018 respectively Page 2 of 7 Packet Pg. 155 7.1.a Edmonds-Woodway High School Synthetic Turf Conversion PLN20180014 (Attachment 4). Notices were also mailed to property owners within 300 feet of the site. No public comments have been received as of the date of this report. Public comment will also be requested as part of the public hearing process before the Hearing Examiner at a future date. D. TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE This application was reviewed and evaluated by South County Fire as well as the Building and Engineering Divisions (Attachment 5). Each group, in addition to Planning, Public Works and others, will review the associated building permit for compliance with all applicable codes. E. NATURAL ENVIRONMENT The Edmonds-Woodway site has been extensively graded and modified during the past 60+ years. There is one stand of larger trees near the southwest corner of the site; this area is not proposed for development during Phase I of the field revitalization project but would likely be modified during Phase II if that happens in the future. Critical Areas: While the larger school site slopes down gradually from west to east, a small slope near the southwest corner of the site was identified as a potential erosion hazard area (CRA20180032). Standard erosion and sediment control techniques must be used during any construction in this area (and across the site) in accordance with the stormwater code in ECDC 18.30. 2. Shoreline: The subject property is not located within shoreline jurisdiction. F. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS The school site is surrounded by multifamily and small scale commercial development with single family residential development further away. Swedish Hospital and related medical services are located to the southeast. G. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The Comprehensive Plan designation for this site is primarily "Public" within the Medical/Highway 99 Activity Center overlay. The undeveloped southwest corner where a portion of Phase 2 would occur is designated "Mixed Use Commercial". The site is subject to the 1994 Edmonds-Woodway High School Master Plan (Attachment 6). The proposal to upgrade the existing sports facilities on the site is consistent with the master plan. H. APPLICABLE CODES 1. ECDC 16.80 Public Use (P) zone There are two site development standards applicable to the design review of this project in ECDC 16.80.030: Landscaping and Lighting. For landscaping, it must meet the requirements of Chapter 20.13 (see pg. 6 of this report for further discussion). Regarding lighting, subsection (1) indicates: "All exterior lighting shall be arranged and directed so as to direct the light away from adjacent residential properties." As shown on the spill light plan provided (Sheet ESPL.1 of Attachment 9), light will directed down onto Page 3 of 7 Packet Pg. 156 7.1.a Edmonds-Woodway High School Synthetic Turf Conversion PLN20180014 the playing fields and tennis courts so very little will directly spill off -site. The additional lighting will create glow at night similar to the existing football field but it will not be directed at any adjacent residential properties. The property performance standard for lighting in ECDC 17.60.030.E indicate that sports lighting must be automatically shut off no later than 10:15 p.m. 2. ECDC 20.11 General Design Review Per ECDC 20.10 (Design Review), General Design Review is required for this project since it is not located in an area that has district -based design standards. ECDC 20.11.030 lists the criteria for Building Design, Site Treatment, and Other Criteria that must be addressed. These criteria are general for all types of development and do not fit easily for a project like this that is purpose -specific for athletic activities. A. ECDC 20.11.030.A. Building Design. No one architectural style is required. The building shall be designed to comply with the purposes of this chapter and to avoid conflict with the existing and planned character of the nearby area. All elements of building design shall form an integrated development, harmonious in scale, line and mass. The following are included as elements of building design: 1. All exterior building components, including windows, doors, eaves, and parapets. The only building proposed is the batting cage at the southeast corner of the site. The building elevation is shown on Sheet F-3.7 of Attachment 9; it is also shown in Attachments 7 & 8. It is a simple building with steel siding, CMU wainscoting, roll up doors on the east fagade, and chain link fence walls. 2. Colors, which should avoid excessive brilliance or brightness except where that would enhance the character of the area. No brilliant colors are proposed on the structures or turf. Photos from similar athletic field upgrade projects in the District are included as Attachment 7. 3. Mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on the roof, grounds or buildings should be screened from view from the street level. An electrical pedestal is proposed just behind the batting cage. It will be screened by the batting cage building itself and landscaping along 216th Street (Sheet F-1.6 of Attachment 9). The other utility equipment like the light poles cannot be screened. 4. Long, massive, unbroken or monotonous buildings shall be avoided in order to comply with the purposes of this chapter and the design objectives of the comprehensive plan. This criterion is meant to describe the entire building. All elements of the design of a building including the massing, building forms, architectural details and finish materials contribute to whether or not a building is found to be long, massive, unbroken or monotonous. The proposed batting cage is not massive or monotonous. Page 4 of 7 Packet Pg. 157 7.1.a Edmonds-Woodway High School Synthetic Turf Conversion PLN20180014 5. All signs should conform to the general design theme of the development. No signage is proposed at this time. Any signage will require a separate building permit. B. ECDC 20.11.030.8. Site Treatment. The existing character of the site and the nearby area should be the starting point for the design of the building and all site treatment. The following are elements of site treatment: 1. Grading, vegetation removal and other changes to the site shall be minimized where natural beauty exists. Large cut and fill and impervious surfaces should be avoided. The baseball field area will be extensively regraded (Sheet F-1.2 of Attachment 9). The proposed field will be elevated about six feet above existing grade as seen from the sidewalk along 2161h Street. This will allow for the installation of an effective drainage system (Sheet F-1.3 of Attachment 9). 2. Landscape treatment shall be provided to enhance the building design and other site improvements. New landscaping is proposed to buffer the new field and batting cage while existing vegetation between the tennis courts and the parking lot will remain (Sheet F-1.6 of Attachment 9). 3. Landscape treatment shall be provided to buffer the development from surrounding property where conflict may result, such as parking facilities near yard spaces, streets or residential units, and different building heights, design or color. See above. 4. Landscaping that could be damaged by pedestrians or vehicles should be protected by curbing or similar devices. All of the proposed landscaping is set back from parking areas, streets and sidewalks. 5. Service yards, and other areas where trash or litter may accumulate, shall be screened with planting or fences or walls which are compatible with natural materials. No service yards or exterior trash facilities are proposed. 6. All screening should be effective in the winter as well as the summer. The proposed landscaping along 216th Street is a mix of evergreen and deciduous trees (Sheet F-1.6 of Attachment 9). The evergreens (arborvitae) will screen the batting cage area year round. Red Sunset Maple and European Hornbeam are deciduous and will screen the ball field except during the winter. 7. Materials such as wood, brick, stone and gravel (as opposed to asphalt or concrete) may be substituted for planting in areas unsuitable for plant growth. Page 5 of 7 Packet Pg. 158 7.1.a Edmonds-Woodway High School Synthetic Turf Conversion PLN20180014 No such areas are proposed. While the field turf will be artificial, the site will be buffered with landscaping along 2161h Street (Sheet F-1.6 of Attachment 9). 8. Exterior lighting shall be the minimum necessary for safety and security. Excessive brightness shall be avoided. All lighting shall be low-rise and directed downward onto the site. Lighting standards and patterns shall be compatible with the overall design theme. The proposed light standards are tall but are compatible with lighting athletic fields and courts. The illumination provided will meet the levels needed for the particular use (Sheets E1.1 & ESPL.1 of Attachment 9). The batting cage building will not be lit C. ECDC 20.11.030.C. Other Criteria. 1. Community facilities and public or quasi -public improvements should not conflict with the existing and planned character of the nearby area. Upgrading the existing baseball field and tennis courts at the high school does not conflict with the character of the area. Adding lights to the tennis courts and baseball/soccer field will extend their use into the evenings and year-round but that is in keeping with the patterns of use of the existing track and football field on the north end of the site. 2. Street furniture (including but not limited to benches, light standards, utility poles, newspaper stands, bus shelters, planters, traffic signs and signals, guardrails, rockeries, walls, mail boxes, fire hydrants and garbage cans) should be compatible with the existing and planned character of the nearby area. No street furniture is proposed in the right-of-way along 216th Street. 3. ECDC 20.13 Landscaping Requirements ECDC 20.13 contains specific landscaping requirements for new developments, which the ADB may alter in accordance with the design review chapter. While the grass baseball field will become artificial turf, the existing landscaping east of the batting cage and tennis courts will remain (Sheet F-1.6 of Attachment 9). Near the frontage along 216th Street, Type III landscaping would be appropriate to buffer the field and batting cage. Type 111 landscaping is intended to provide visual separation of uses from streets, and visual separation of compatible uses so as to soften the appearance of streets, parking areas and building elevations. 1. Evergreen and deciduous trees, with no more than 50 percent being deciduous, a minimum of six feet in height, and planted at intervals no greater than 30 feet on center, and 2. If planted to buffer a building elevation, shrubs, a minimum of three and one-half feet in height, and living ground cover planted so that the ground will be covered within three years, or Page 6 of 7 Packet Pg. 159 Edmonds-Woodway High School Synthetic Turf Conversion PLN20180014 7.1.a 3. If planted to buffer a parking area, access, or site development other than a building, any of the following alternatives may be used unless otherwise noted: a. Shrubs, a minimum of three and one-half feet in height, and living ground cover must be planted so that the ground will be covered within three years. b. Earth -mounding, an average of three and one-half feet in height, planted with shrubs or living ground cover so that the ground will be covered within three years. This alternative may not be used in a downtown or waterfront area. c. A combination of earth mounding, opaque fences and shrubs to produce a visual barrier at least three and one-half feet in height. While the exact tree species mix requirement for Type III is not met by the proposal, the mix of deciduous trees (20) and evergreen trees (13) shown meets the intent of the screening criteria. The ball control fencing, batting cages, and light structures will all still be visible from the street front at 2161" but their appearance will be softened by the proposed vegetation. The batting cage will be screened by a row of arborvitae while the field will be screened by a combination of Red Sunset Maple and European Hornbeam trees. Staff suggests that the ADB accept the proposed landscaping plan as shown on Sheet F-1.6 of Attachment 9. III. RECOMMENDATION Pursuant to ECDC 20.11.020, when recommending approval of proposed development applications, the ADB must find that the proposed development is consistent with the criteria listed in ECDC 20.11.030 (General Design Review), the Comprehensive Plan, and the zoning ordinance. Based on the findings, analysis, conclusions, and attachments with this report, staff suggests that the ADB RECOMMEND APPROVAL of the design of the proposed Edmonds- Woodway High School Synthetic Turf Conversion under file number PLN20180014 with the following motion and recommended condition of approval: THE ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN BOARD ADOPTS THE FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND ANALYSIS OF THE STAFF REPORT IN FILE PLN20180014 AND FINDS THE PROPOSAL IS CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, DESIGN CRITERIA OF ECDC 20.11.030, AND ZONING REGULATIONS AND RECOMMENDS THAT THE HEARING EXAMINER APPROVE THE DESIGN OF THE PROPOSED EDMONDS-WOODWAY HIGH SCHOOL SYNTHETIC TURF CONVERSION WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITION: 1. THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPING SHOWN ON SHEET F-1.6 OF ATTACHMENT 9 MEETS THE INTENT OF THE TYPE III LANDSCAPING CRITERIA IN ECDC 20.13. IV. PARTIES OF RECORD Nick Chou Edmonds School District 20420 68t" Ave. W Lynnwood, WA 98036 Page 7 of 7 Packet Pg. 160 7.1.b City of Edmonds Land Use Application PLN20180014 - Design Review PLN20180015 - CU for P zone PLN20180016 - Height PLN20170017 - Setbacks ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN REVIEW PLAI?0130017 FOR OFFICIAt- USE ONLY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PL gLO l $ I S FILE # ZONE HOME OCCUPATION DATE l� _ REC'D BY M C/ FORMAL SUBDIVISION SHORT SUBDIVISION FEET 7 ❑ • QQ RECEIPT # LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT HEARING DATE PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT OFFICIAL STREET MAP AMENDMENT E -STAFF STREET VACATION REZONE SHORELINE PERMIT p � 9 o(q 16 — o o VARIANCE / REASONABLE USE EXCEPTION I L 1v zo (2 OTHER: ❑ PB i-7 CkADB KCC • PLEASE NOTE THAT ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED WITHIN THE APPLICATION IS A PUBLIC RECORD • PROPERTY ADDRESS OR LOCATION 7600 212th St SW, Edmonds, WA 98026 PROJECT NAME (IF APPLICABLE) Edmonds-Woodway High School Fields PROPERTY OWNER Edmonds School District, Attn: Nick Chou PHONE# 425-431-7161 ADDRESS 20420 68th AveW. Lynn pod WA 98036 E-MAIL ChouN edmonds.wednet.edu FAx# 425-431-7171 TAX ACCOUNT # 27043000104800 SEC. 30 TWP. 27 RNG. 04 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT OR PROPOSED USE (ATTACH COVER LETTER AS NECESSARY) Please see attached narrative, DESCRIBE HOW THE PROJECT MEETS APPLICABLE CODES (ATTACH COVER LETTER AS NECESSARY) Please see attached narrative: APPLICANT Edmonds School District, Attn: Nick Chou PHONE# 425-431-7161 ADDRESS 20420 68th Ave W., Lynnwood, WA 98036 E-MAIL ChouN@edmonds.wednet.edu FAx# - 1-71 i CONTACT PERSON/AGENT Camie And erson/Shockey Planning Group PHONE # 425-258-9308 ADDRESS 2716 Colby Avenue, Everett. WA 98201 E-MAIL candersorT@shockqyplanning.com FAx# 425-259-4888 The undersigned applicant, and his/her/its heirs, and assigns, in consideration on the processing of the application agrees to release, indemnify, defend and hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any and all damages, including reasonable attorney's fees, arising from any action or infraction based in whole or part upon false, misleading, inaccurate or incomplete information famished by the applicant, his/her/its agents or employees. By my signature, I certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted am. true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that I am authorized to file this application on the behalf of the owner as listed bEttlw. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT/AGENT Pr 6 rtY wne'r'g 1athori?ation I AA— :kM 11 , certify under the penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that the following is a true and correct statement: I have authorized the above Applicant/Agent to apply for the subject land use application, and n1 my f the City of Edmonds to enter the subject property for the ptupo SIGNATURE OF OWNER Attachment 1 TE PLN20180014 DA Revised on 8122112 Page I of] Packet Pg. 161 7.1.c 2716 -61 w A� land llM Fv ", WA 98201 SHOCKEY Fatimdmedulln+h+u yr 425,25119 we Cr%lrralidgsrrrrrr nirrllnire ride I98Q.' PLANNING GROUP, Inc.IM ISAIi Poliav f. a25.259.Oaa9 ww•w.Fwrcir.l+l.ndenp.cam Edmonds-Woodway High School Synthetic Turf Conversion Conditional Use Permit Variance Request and Design Review Criteria Narrative The Edmonds School District No. 15 (District) is proposing upgrades to the existing baseball and soccer fields and tennis courts at Edmonds-Woodway High School. The proposed project includes three storage containers north of the baseball field, an area for javelin and discus west of the baseball field, a synthetic turf multipurpose baseball field with football/soccer field (and associated lighting) and bullpens. In addition, four tennis courts (and associated lighting for new and existing courts) are proposed east of the baseball field. Three batting cages are proposed south of the tennis courts. In accordance with ECC 16.80.010(C), playfield lighting and structures over 25 feet in height require Conditional Use Permits in the P zone. In addition to the site being used as a high school campus, which requires a Conditional Use Permit (CUP), this conditional use permit includes the following site elements requiring a CUP. • Six light poles associated with the baseball/soccer fields that are 70 feet in height and two poles that are 90 feet in height. • Eight light poles associated with the tennis courts that are 50 feet in height. • The backstop and associated netting is proposed to be 40 feet in height. A variance request is included for the following site features: • Light pole west of the north bullpen (pole 132) which is proposed to be 90 feet in height. • Light pole south of the east bullpen (pole 61) which is proposed to be 90 feet in height. ■ The southern batting cage/netting tunnel is proposed within the 20 foot building setback line. This batting cage is a removable net system consisting of chain link fence post and fabric adjacent to the netting post and netting. Some permanent features would be located within the setback. The batting cage net is proposed to be 3.76 feet from the property line. Conditional Use Permit No conditional use permit may be approved unless all of the findings in this section can be made. Attachment 2 PLN20180014 Packet Pg. 162 7.1.c A. That the proposed use is consistent with the comprehensive plan 2016 Comprehensive Plan Renovations would not result in changes in the land use patter in the City of Edmonds. Medical/Highway 99 Vision. The Medical/Highway 99 activity center is intended to encourage the development of a pedestrian and transit oriented focused on two master planned development, Swedish/Edmonds medical center and Edmonds-Woodway High School, with a related high -intensity development corridor along Highway 99. The proposed conversion project would not have an impact or change in use for the existing site. In addition, the proposal would not impede the existing sidewalks and pedestrian orientation that currently occurs on the site and immediate vicinity. However, due to security concerns of the overall site, no direct access to the proposed facilities is proposed from 216th Street SW. Capital Facilities Policy A.1 Provide capital facility improvements in order to meet or exceed established service standards. Conversion of the turf to a synthetic turf will allow increased use of the existing fields. In addition, the inclusion of the lighting would allow usage into the evening. These capital facility improvements are not only beneficial to the District, but also to the citizens of Edmonds. B. Zoning Ordinance. That the proposed use, and its location, is consistent with the purposes of the zoning ordinance and the purposes of the zone district in which the use is to be located, and that the proposed use will meet all applicable requirements of the zoning ordinance. The proposed use and site location are consistent with the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance and the purposes of the Zone District in which the use is to be located. The proposed use will meet all applicable requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. The existing school is located in the Public Use (P1) zone of the City of Edmonds. High Schools are allowed through Conditional Uses. The lights would be down -shielded and outfitted with glare cut-off shields to minimize fugitive light spilling onto neighboring properties. Taller poles reduce the angle of spill light and reduce glare and sky glow. This would reduce intensity of light impacts to the surrounding properties. There is also existing lighting on the football and fastpitch fields to the north. Noise generated from the site would be consistent with existing conditions. Site activities would continue past the times of current use; however, this would be consistent with current noise levels and code provisions. Activities on the field would end by 10:00 p.m. to ensure compliance with the City's noise ordinance. Packet Pg. 163 7.1.c Existing parking at Edmonds-Woodway High School would serve the project. Activities held on the fields or tennis courts typically occur after school hours, when there is adequate on -site parking. Additional use of the fields and courts would take place after non -peak times. Existing trips would just extend longer into the day due to the ability to light the field and courts. C. Not Detrimental. That the use, as approved or conditionally approved, will not be significantly detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare, and to nearby private property or improvements unless the use is a public necessity. The site is currently developed as athletic uses. By converting to synthetic turf and providing lighting, it would provide upgraded facilities and allow additional use by student and the community. All proposed development would occur within existing developed areas. In addition to the Conditional Use Permit Criteria listed above, according to EMC 16.80.020, there are additional criteria listed in the Public Use (P) zone. In considering a conditional use permit application under Chapter 20.05 EMC for the public use (P) zone, the hearing examiner and/or city council shall consider the following: A. Impact of the proposal on the visual and aesthetic character of the neighborhood. The lights would be down -shielded and outfitted with glare cut-off shields to minimize fugitive light spilling onto neighboring properties. Taller poles reduce the angle of spill light and reduce glare and sky glow. This would reduce intensity of light impacts to the residents adjacent to the fields. Impacts associated with the proposal are discussed in the environmental checklist submitted as part of the CUP application. In addition, the proposed lights are similar to those that have already been installed and used on the site for football and fastpitch. The proposed lights would B. Orientation of facilities to developed or undeveloped residential areas. Although the lights would be installed on a field that is adjacent to high density residentially zoned properties, the lights would be outfitted with glare cut-off shields to minimize fugitive light spillage. There is also existing lighting on the football field located immediately to the north of the proposed development area. In addition, the fastpitch field in the northwest portion of the site is also illuminated. C. Preservation of natural vegetation and/or other natural features. The site is already developed for athletic uses. However, there are approximately six significant evergreen trees that need to be removed on the eastern perimeter of the site. D. Hours of operation; performance standards; conformance of the proposal with the city's noise ordinance. Packet Pg. 164 7.1.c Noise generated from the site would be consistent with existing conditions. Site activities would continue past current use, however, this would be consistent with current noise levels and code provisions. Activities on the field would end by 10:00 p.m. to ensure compliance with the City's noise ordinance. E. Ability of the proposal to provide for adequate on -site parking; and traffic impacts of the proposal on the neighborhood. (Ord 3353 Section 8, 20011. Existing parking at Edmonds-Woodway High School would serve the project. Activities held at the baseball, soccer and tennis courts typically occur after school hours, when there is adequate on -site parking. Additional use of the fields would take place after non -peak times. Existing trips would just extend longer into the day due to the ability to light the field. Variance No variance may be approved unless all of the findings in this section can be made. 1. Special Circumstances. That, because of special circumstances relating to the property, the strict enforcement of the zoning ordinance would deprive the owner of use rights and privileges permitted to other properties in the vicinity with the same zoning. Special circumstances include the size, shape, topography, location or surroundings of the property, public necessity as of public structures and uses set forth in ECDC 17.00.030 and environmental factors such as vegetation, streams, ponds and wildlife habitats. Special circumstances should not be predicated upon any factor personal to the owner such as age or disability, extra expenses which may be necessary to comply with the zoning ordinance, the ability to secure a scenic view, the ability to make more profitable use of the property, nor any factor resulting from the action of the owner or any past owner of the some property. The site is an existing high school. The proposed conversion project would provide a greater level of service for the field and not dramatically chance the existing use of that portion of the site. 2. Special Privile e. That the approval of the variance would not be a grant of special privilege to the property in comparison with the limitations upon other properties in the vicinity of the same zoning; As a Public Use, the High School is zoned Public (P) and is therefore unique in the neighborhood surrounding the site. The proposed lighting of the existing field and additional tennis courts would extend the hours of use for both students and the general public from dusk to a scheduled turn-off consistent with City regulations and the approved Conditional Use Permit conditions. The field and tennis courts could not be appropriately lit if the variance is denied. Packet Pg. 165 7.1.c 3. Comprehensive Plan. That the approval of the variance will be consistent with the comprehensive plan; See A above under Conditional Use Permit. 4. Zoning Ordinance. That the approval of the variance will be consistent with the purposes of the zoning ordinance and the zone district in which the property is located; The proposed use and site location are consistent with the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance and the purposes of the Zone District in which the use is to be located. The proposed use will meet all applicable requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. The existing school is located in the Public Use (131) zone of the City of Edmonds. High Schools are allowed through Conditional Uses. The lights would be down -shielded and outfitted with glare cut-off shields to minimize fugitive light spilling onto neighboring properties. Taller poles reduce the angle of spill light and reduce glare and sky glow. This would reduce intensity of light impacts to the surrounding properties. There is also existing lighting on the football and fastpitch fields to the north. Noise generated from the site would be consistent with existing conditions. Site activities would continue past the times of current use; however, this would be consistent with current noise levels and code provisions. Activities on the field would end by 10:00 p.m. to ensure compliance with the City's noise ordinance. Existing parking at Edmonds-Woodway High School would serve the project. Activities held on the fields or tennis courts typically occur after school hours, when there is adequate on -site parking. Additional use of the fields and courts would take place after non -peak times. Existing trips would just extend longer into the day due to the ability to light the field and courts. 5. Not Detrimental. That the variance as approved or conditionally approved will not be significantly detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and some zone; Approval of the variance should not be detrimental to the surrounding properties. The proposed light poles (90 foot poles) would be setback from the property line a minimum 143 feet. The batting cage would be set back 3.76 feet. The nearest residential property is located across 216th Street SW. The 90 foot light poles would be outfitted with glare cut-off shields to minimize fugitive light spillage. 6. Minimum Variance. That the approved variance is the minimum necessary to allow the owner the rights enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity with the some zoning. The athletic field lighting poles are designed using typical pole heights of 70' to 90' to provide safe lighting levels and meet the minimum lighting standards set by the Illuminating Packet Pg. 166 7.1.c Engineering Society. The pole heights also dramatically reduce the negative impacts of light spill and glare produced compared to the use of shorter poles. Shorter poles would require that the flood lights be aimed at very shallow angles eliminating the effectiveness of the floodlight shielding. Using shorter poles exposes the users and community to excessive spill light/glare and does not provide minimum lighting levels required for safe play. Design Review Other than describing how the proposal satisfies the applicable requirement and standards of the Comprehensive Plan (see CUP A above) and the Edmonds Community Development Code (see CUP B and Zoning Variance 4 above), there are no additional criteria that need to be met for review. The analysis provided above addresses the required information, so no additional analysis is provided specific to this permit item. Packet Pg. 167 7.1.d DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE RECEIVED Edmonds School District No. 15 � �1 �, 2010 Edmonds-Woodway High School Synthetic Turf Conversation DEVELOPMENT SERVICES COLINTE DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The Edmonds School District No. 15 (District) is proposing upgrades to the existing baseball and soccer fields and tennis courts at Edmonds-Woodway High School. Phase I of the proposed project includes an area for javelin and discus, west of the baseball field, a synthetic turf multipurpose baseball field with football/soccer field (and associated lighting) and bullpens. In addition, four tennis courts (and associated lighting) are proposed east of the baseball field. Three batting cages are proposed south of the tennis courts. A portion of two tennis courts directly north and one tennis court east of the existing baseball field would be demolished to accommodate the improvements. In accordance with ECC 16.80.010(C), playfield lighting and structures over 25 feet in height require Conditional Use Permits in the P zone. In addition to the site being used as a high school campus, which requires a Conditional Use Permit (CUP), this conditional use permit includes the following site elements requiring a CUP. • Six light poles associated with the baseball/soccer fields that are 70 feet in height and two poles that are 90 feet in .height. • Eight light poles associated with the tennis courts that are 50 feet in height. • The backstop and associated netting is proposed to be 40 feet in height. A variance request is included for the following site features: ■ Light pole west of the north bullpen (pole B2) which is proposed to be 90 feet in height. • Light pole south of the east bullpen (pole B1) which is proposed to be 90 feet in height. • The southern batting cage is proposed within the 20 foot building setback line. This batting cage is a removable net system consisting of chain link fence post and fabric adjacent to the netting post and netting. Some permanent features would be located within the setback. The removable batting cage fencing is proposed to be 3.76 feet from the property line. Phase 2 of the project is proposed to include a natural turf football and soccer field to the west of the proposed baseball field. Also included in this phase is the installation of trees and groundcover to the west of the proposed football and soccer field and relocation of the javelin and discus field event venues. No fields constructed in Phase 2 would include illurnination. This phase would require a Conditional Use Permit from the City of Edmonds because the site is located in a multi -family zone and does not currently have a CUP associated with it. The proposed action will require approval of Admiauistrativc Dcsign Review, Conditional Use Permit, Variance Approval, Building Permits and associated construction permits from the City of Edmonds. PROPONENT: Edmonds School District No. 15 LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: The site is located at 7600 212`n Street SW, Edmonds, Washington. The Snohomish County Tax Parcel Number is: 2704300104800 and is located in the NE 114 of Section 30, Township 27 North, Range 04 East, W.M. and totals 30 acres. LEAD AGENCY: Edmonds School District No. 15 The lead agency for this proposal has determined that the proposal does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCV+1 43.21 C.030(2)(c). This determination assumes compliance with State law and City of Edmonds ordinances related to general environmental protection including, but not limited to: demolition and utilities. This decision Attachment 3 PLN20180014 Packet Pg. 168 7.1.d was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public upon request. Note: Issuance of this threshold determination does not constitute approval of the permit. This proposal will be reviewed for compliance with all applicable City of Edmonds, which regulates development activities. It is the policy of the District that, when undertaking an action involving the exercise of substantive SEPA authority, the District shall consider,, as appropriate under the circumstances, the ramifications of such action as to one or more of the factors listed in Edmonds School District No. 15 Policy 9630, TO SEPA and Agency Decisions. This Determination of Non -Significance (DNS) is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2). The lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the published date below. Comments must be submitted in writing by June 25, 2018 to the Responsible Official as named below. The responsible official will reconsider the DNS based on timely comments and may retain, modify, or, if significant adverse impacts are likely, withdraw the DNS. If the DNS is retained, it will be final after the expiration of the comment deadline. Responsible Official: Stewart N4hyre, Edmonds School District No. 15 Title; Executive Director of Business and Operations Address: Edmonds School District No. 15 20420 6P Avenue West Lynnwood, Washington 98036 Phone: (425) 431-7015 Issue Date: June 11, 2018 Signature: Date: Z u There is no agency appeal process f r this determination. Determination ofNon-Significance Edmonds-Woo.dway Synthetic Turf Conversion Edmonds Scliool District No. 15 Page 2 Packet Pg. 169 7.1.d 27t6Calhp Awns IAnauw E%vwte.VRA "206 SHOGKEY &MM—Meow ,' omNui� R d29-258.9 �i0A {.tltliraring srrriar rxrrllrrusirr r rr 1980! 'PL.ANNINGGROUP, loc. NFimi:inc f-d2S-259-i"s xrynr.&rdfc7P4atmung.m m June 26, 2018 Edmonds School District No. 15 Attn: Nick Chou, Design and Construction Manager 20420 68t" Avenue West Lynnwood, WA 98036 RE: Edmonds School District No. 15 Edmonds-Woodway High School Synthetic Turf Conversion SEPA Compliance Dear Mr. Chou, The Shockey Planning Group assisted the Edmonds School District (District) in their role as lead agency for the synthetic turf conversion at Edmonds-Woodway High School. The District issued a Determination of Non -Significance (DNS) on June 11, 2018, consistent with WAC 197-11- 340(2). The comment period ended on June 25, 2018. No comments were received on the DNS. The District does not have an appeal period. Therefore, the DNS is final as issued on June 11, 2018. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at (425) 258-9308. Sincerely, SHOCKEY PLANNING GROUP, INC. Camie Anderson Senior Associate Cc: Michael Clugston, City of Edmonds F:\E-misc\EDSC-EWFields-Permitting\Correspondence\L_ 180626 E-W HS Fields SEPA Compliance Letter.doc Packet Pg. 170 7.1.e CITY OF EDMONDS 121 5th Avenue North, Edmonds WA 98020 Phone: 425.771.0220 • Fax: 425.771.0221 • Web: www.edmondswa. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT • PLANNING DIVISION April 2, 2018 Nick Chou Edmonds School District choun@edmonds.wednet.edu Subject: Letter of Complete Application — Edmonds-Woodway High School Fields (Files: PLN20180014 - 0017) Nick, The City of Edmonds has reviewed the March 5, 2018 submittal for updating the Edmonds- Woodway High School baseball field, tennis courts, and related improvements at 7600 2121h Street SW. Included are land use permit requests for: 1. Design review of the proposed improvements (PLN20180014) 2. Conditional use permit for bleachers, playfield lighting, and several structures between 25 and 60 feet in height including the backstop and ball control netting (PLN20180015) 3. Two variance requests, one for a setback reduction at 216th for a batting cage and another for the height of light poles around the baseball field and tennis courts (PLN20180016 & 0017) Pursuant to Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) Section 20.02.002, the applications have been determined to meet procedural submission requirements and are therefore complete; please accept this letter as the City's completeness notice in accordance with ECDC 20.02.003. The City will proceed to issue public notice as required by Chapter 20.03 of the ECDC. However, while the applications are technically complete, additional information or clarification is requested. Please address all comments in a written response and by providing updated plans, as appropriate. Additional comments or corrections from Engineering Division may be forthcoming. 1. Photos, renderings or spec sheets of structures and materials from similar projects including the bleachers, dugouts, fencing, ball control netting, batting cages, lights and light poles. 2. Visual simulations. Before/after photo simulations looking northeast from near the intersection of 216th Street and 791h Avenue, another looking northwest from near the Attachment 4 PLN20180014 Packet Pg. 171 7.1.e high school parking lot entrance from 2161h, and a third looking southeast from near the proposed javelin area. 3. Landscaping plan. 'Landscape restoration' areas are shown on Sheet F-1.0 but there is no detail. Please submit a landscaping plan prepared in accordance with ECDC 20.13 showing detail throughout the renovated area of what is being removed and replaced along with compliance with the setback landscaping requirement in ECDC 16.80.030.A. SEPA Comments It is understood that the Edmonds School District will be acting as the lead agency for the environmental review of this project. The following comments are in response to the project draft Environmental Checklist dated February 2018: 1. Section (13)(7)(b)(2), last sentence. Noise levels must be consistent with the City's noise regulations in Chapter 5.30 (ECC). Sounds originating from league or school sponsored athletic events are exempt from the provisions of ECC 5.30 at all times. 2. Section (13)(8)(h). A City of Edmonds critical area checklist is on file for the site — CRA20180032 —which identified potential erosion hazard areas. 3. Section (13)(11)(d). Per ECDC 17.60.030, sports field lighting must be turned off by an automatically timed mechanism no later than 10:15 pm. If you have any questions, please let me know either at 425-771-0220 or michael.clugston@edmondswa.gov. Sincerely, Mike Clugston, AICP Associate Planner Cc: Camie Anderson, Shockey Planning Group Packet Pg. 172 7.1.e i. CITY OF EDMONDS NOTICE OF APPLICATION PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The Edmonds School District No. 15 (District) is proposing upgrade to the existing baseball and soccer fields and tennis courts at Edmonds-Woodway High School. Phase I of the proposed project includes a relocated storage building and three storage containers north of the baseball field. Also proposed is an area for javelin and discus, west of the baseball field, a synthetic turf multipurpose baseball field with football/soccer field (and associated lighting) and bullpens. In addition, four tennis courts (and associated lighting) are proposed east of the baseball field. Three batting cages are proposed south of the tennis courts. A portion of two tennis courts directly north and one tennis court east of the existing baseball field would be demolished to accommodate the improvements. Phase I is expected to occur during the summer and fall of 2018. If additional funding becomes available, Phase II of the project would include the installation of an unlighted natural turf football and soccer field west of the proposed baseball field; separate land use and building permits would be required for that work. PROJECT LOCATION: 7600 212th Street SW (Tax ID #: 27043000104800) NAME OF APPLICANT: Edmonds School District (rep. D.A. Hogan & Associates and Shockey Planning Group) FILE NUBMERS: PLN20180014 (Design Review), PLN20180015 (Conditional Use Permit — bleachers, playfield lighting, structures over 25' tall), PLN20180016 (Variance — structures over 60' tall), PLN20180017 (Variance — street setback at 216th Street) DATE OF APPLICATION: March 5, 2018 DATE OF COMPLETENESS: April 2, 2018 DATE OF NOTICE: April 16, 2018 REQUESTED PERMITS: Architectural Design Board Review, Conditional Use Permit, Two Variances OTHER REQUIRED Building permits PERMITS: REQUIRED STUDIES: N/A EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS: SEPA Checklist and Determination, Critical Area Checklist, Geotechnical Report, Stormwater Report COMMENTS ON PROPOSAL DUE: May 1, 2018 CITY CONTACT: Mike Clugston, AICP, Associate Planner michael.clugston@edmondswa.gov 425-771-0220 Packet Pg. 173 7.1.e City of Edmonds PLN20180014-0017 0 188.08 376 2 Feet This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is for reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accurate, WGS_1984_Web_Mercator_Auxiliary_Sphere current, or otherwise reliable. © City of Edmonds THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION 0 Legend ArcSDE.GIS.STREET CENTERLINE: <all other values> 1 2 5; 4 9;71;7;8 State Highways <all othervalues> 0 1 _- 2 Notes Edmonds-Woodway High School Synthetic Turf Conversion _N fC L M E 0 V Y C) Z Q a.+ E U R 2 Packet Pg. 174 1 7.1.e Project: Edmonds School District No. 15 Edmonds-Woodway High School Synthetic Turf Conversion ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS AND RESIDENTS LIST On my oath, I certify that the names and addresses provided represent the owners and residents located within 300 feet of the subject property. This list contains the mailing information for both the area property owners and current residents. Karen Varnell State of Washington ) ) ss. County of Snohomish) On this day personally appeared before me Karen Varnell to me known to be the individual described herein and who executed the within and foregoing instrument as acknowledged to me that he signed the same as her free and voluntary act and deed for the purposes therein mentioned. Given under my hand and official seal this , day of i kLv-e k , 2018 _� @,AS�►U rl�� T�kftARV PUBLIC in and for the State of rN 'f, "o SO g . p - Washington, residing in iyeare'� /,yh' 0i\\; �0`-= Commission Expires 'JJ o f WJ'sx RECEIVED tY,gR ® J 2010 DEVELOPP E TER "CES Mailing List Affrrlavit Prepared by SHOCKEY PLANNING GROUP Packet Pg. 175 0918/0° tg8 fu9AV owe alg pdwoo ww L9 x ww gZ lewaol op avanbll3 7.1.e l8/0919@) tiaAV ul€M algllEdwoo „8/g Z x „L oz€s logi 00373600300308 00373600300500 00373600300501 STEPHEN F & SHANNON BULLOCK GEORGE P JOHNSON NHIM SONG OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 21402 80TH AVE W 21526 80TH AVE W 8018 215TH PL SW EDMONDS, WA 98026-7459 EDMONDS, WA 98026 EDMONDS, WA 98026-7460 00450400000201 00450400000400 00461000100101 HOWARD ROEHL / SHANNON & DONNA 7500 BUILDING LLC HR ACQUIST I CORPORAT€ON STAFFORD OR CURRENT OWNER 2002196TH ST SW 3310 W�W END AVE STE 700 7530 212TH ST SW LYNNWOOD, WA 98036 NAY ILLE, TN 37203 0 EDMONDS, WA 98026-7604 N L 00461000100102 00461000100401 00461000100901 a c ACQUISTION I CORPORATION DEBRA EKLUND ALSETH EDNA RICHARD / JAMS SIMONS o V 3310 WESTEND AVE STE 700 961 CAROL WAY PO BOX 1121 NASHVILLE, TN 37203 EDMONDS, WA 98020-2939 EDMONDS, WA 98020 H r m t 00461000100903 00461000101000 00501200000100 ROBERT STUVERUD BORGERT SUNCREST APARTMENTS SUSANA H MARTINEZ to OR CURRENT OWNER 751 LAUREL ST PO BOX 363 0 7916 216TH ST SW EDMONDS, WA 98020 LYNNWOOD, WA 98046 EDMONDS, WA 98026-7939 N t 00501200000200 00501200000300 00501200001400 SHERRI SMITH / CARL & NAI LINH JILL LEIGH BROWN MIGUEL F JIMENEZ OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 7519 215TH ST SW 7515 215TH ST SW 7514 215TH ST SW o EDMONDS, WA 98026-7691 EDMONDS, WA 98026 EDMONDS, WA 98026-7691?� u� 00501200001500 00501200001600 00512900000100 0 JULIO JIMENEZ-CELI & LIANA JIMENEZ HUNTER INVESTMENTS LLC STEPHEN & KAREN CROSBY E OR CURRENT OWNER 215 1ST AVE W STE 200 OR CURRENT OWNER w w 7520 215TH ST SW SEATTLE, WA 98119 21606 79TH AVE W EDMONDS, WA 98026 EDMONDS, WA 98026-7936 'L 00512900000200 00512900000300 00512900000400 NICOLE M & AARON REIMAN KRIST. RUBASHENKOVA & VALDIMIR NICHOLAS PREBEZAC E 105 N MOUNT DANIELS DR GRABARCHUK OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 2 ELLENSBURG, WA 98926 21624 79TH AVE W 21630 79TH AVE W o z EDMONDS, WA 98026-7936 EDMONDS, WA 98026-7936 v r r 00512900000500 00512900000600 00512900000700 Q SCOTT & SARAH M MCCORMICK MICHAEL & KIMBERLY G CONNOR DON & GENEVIEVE P TROYER OR CURRENT OWNER 9323 224TH ST SW OR CURRENT OWNER 21623 79TH AVE W EDMONDS, WA 98020 21609 79TH AVE W EDMONDS, WA 98026-7936 EDMONDS, WA 98026 ;m Q 00512900000800 00512900000900 00512900001000 ADRIAN DITTMAR CHARLES JR & ELAINE BAXTER DENNIS L ANDERSON OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 21604 78TH AVE W 21612 78TH AVE W 21626 78TH AVE W EDMONDS, WA 98026-7930 EDMONDS, WA 98026-7930 EDMONDS, WA 98026-7930 00512900001100 00512900001300 00541500000100 STEVENS PARK LLC CHIKAKO S WEGRICH KATHLEEN MACPHERSON PO BOX 1813 OR CURRENT OWNER 3021 NE 130TH ST BOTHELL, WA 98041 2160178TH AVE W UNIT A PO BOX 75086 EDMONDS, WA 98026 SEATTLE, WA 98125 Packet Pg. 176 09 GS/4949@ �1aAV oane algl;edwoo ww L9 x ww gZ temol op 7.1.e ananbll3 . , ozls RA .X8109150,taartV ql)m alQ!:ladwos ,,S/9 Z x „G lags 00541500000200 00541500001400 00541500001500 ROY ROBINSON C.S.TRUST EVAN A OLSON PRERANA RANJITKAR & ANDREW TUCK[ 7802 206TH ST SW OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER EDMONDS, WA 98026-6862 8014 215TH ST SW 8006 215TH ST SW EDMONDS, WA 98026-7462 EDMONDS, WA 98026 00566900400703 00566900400703 0056690040 704 PORTFIELD MANAGEMENT CORP STRICKLAND GC PROPERTIES PORTFIqff MANAGEMENT CORP 811 1ST AVE # 422 811 1ST AVE # 422 811 PT AVE # 422 SEATTLE, WA 98104 SEATTLE, WA 98104 5E LE, WA 98104 0 N L 00566900400705 00566900400706 00573300000100 c SOUTHLAND CORP MANAGEMp& CORP PORTERFIELD DANIEL J ARTHUR V PO BOX 711 OR CURB T OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER DALLAS, TX 75221 8111 AVE # 422 8007 215TH PL SW SEA LE, WA 98104 EDMONDS, WA 98026-7460 r 00573300000200 00580700002500 00595600000100 m GE NEWMAN PUBLIC HOSPITAL DISTRICT 2 OF PATRICIA ANN VALLE OR CURRENT OWNER SNOHOMISH CTY OR CURRENT OWNER c 8015 215TH PL SW 4710 196TH ST SW 21117 78TH AVE W EDMONDS, WA 98026 LYNNWOOD, WA 98036-5517 EDMONDS, WA 98026 N t 00595600001100 00595600001200 00595600001300 BENJAMIN & IAN ROSE PARRILLA J. GRAY / V. CLOUSE / A. WILKINSON BURKE / BURKE / STEVEN TRUST OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 9230 217TH ST SW 3 21118 78TH AVE W 21126 78TH AVE W EDMONDS, WA 98020 0 EDMONDS, WA 98026 EDMONDS, WA 98026 ?� 00614300001602 00614300001602 00614300001605 u� E MANAGEMENT CORP PORTERFIELD 81.11 E # 422 THREE GRACES #3, LLC 8325 212TH ST SW, #103 MANAGEMENT CORP PORTERFIELD 811 1ST # 422 w SEAi�,L A 98104 EDMONDS, WA 98026 5EA , WA 98104 00614300001607 00614300001701 00614300002001 L m E MANAGEME -CORP PORTERFIELD OASIS INC RPA PROPERTIES LLC 811 1ST AK # 422 15516 129TH AVE NE 24310 101ST AVE W SEATT. , WA 98104 WOODINVILLE, WA 98072 EDMONDS, WA 98020 Z v 00614300002002 00614300002202 00660400010100 Q THERESA M & WARD FORREST AN JUN ZHI DI LLC LORI M O'NEAL PO BOX 605 6464 HIGH POINT DRIVE SE OR CURRENT OWNER EDMONDS, WA 98020 SEATTLE, WA 98126 21105 80TH AVE W UNIT 101 t EDMONDS, WA 98026-7007 m Q 00660400010200 00660400010300 00660400010400 KRYSTYNE G KENNEY PAUL & LINNAEA PATTERSON CONSTANCE L COTTON OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 21105 80TH AVE W #102 21105 80TH AVE W UNIT 103 21105 80TH AVE W UNIT 104 EDMONDS, WA 98026 EDMONDS, WA 98026-7007 EDMONDS, WA 98026-7007 00671400000100 00671400000200 00671400000300 SIBIU LLC SIBIU SIBIU LLC SIBIU PROPERTIES LLC KIENKHAI OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURREN,VOWNER 17810 33RD PL W 7935 216TH ST SW UNIT A 7935 21 ST SW UNIT A LYNNWOOD, WA 98037-7733 EDMONDS, WA 98026-7941 EDMOKDS, WA 98026-7941 Packet Pg. 177 09L9/0-e1 r,* AnAV eane a!gliedwao ww L9 x ww 5Z lewaot Op anan7.1.ebiI3 , , 8/09 L4@ AGenV 41!M alq!:Iedwoo „g/g Z x „L ozis logi 00671400000400 00671400000500 00679800010100 SURINDER & PARMINDER REKHI JIANDE & ASHLEY CHEN / ZHI-FANG DENG PAUL A INGILDSEN OR CURRENT OWNER 714 BIRCH PL 9259 26TH AVE NW 7935 216TH ST SW, UNIT E EDMONDS, WA 98020 SEATTLE, WA 98117 EDMONDS, WA 98026 00679800010200 00679800010300 00679800010400 CANDACE & JOHN DALKE NICOLE R HOLLINGSHEAD SHANNON SCHLINGER LIVING TRUST OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 21615 80TH AVE W UNIT 102 21615 80TH AVE W UNIT 103 21617 80TH AVE W #104 EDMONDS, WA 98026-7804 EDMONDS, WA 98026 EDMONDS, WA 98026 0 aD 00679800010500 00679800020100 00679800020200 c JEANETTE MARIE BECKER MING YUAN LIN WHITNEY & IORI SAKAKIBARA U OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 21617 80TH AVE W UNIT 105 21615 80TH AVE W UNIT 201 21615 80TH AVE W UNIT 202 H EDMONDS, WA 98026 EDMONDS, WA 98026-7804 EDMONDS, WA 98026 V aD t 00679800020300 00679800020400 00679800020500 JAIME SMITH GENEVIEVE M SCHMIDT THOMAS J VACHON U' v7 OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 0 21615 80TH AVE W #203 21615 80TH AVE W #204 21615 80TH AVE W #205 t EDMONDS, WA 98026 EDMONDS, WA 98026 EDMONDS, WA 98026 j t a� 00679800020600 00679800020700 00679800020800 KRISTINA LEE TENNEBOE PAUL MARSCHALL CRISTIN G KING OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 3 21615 80TH AVE W UNIT 206 21617 80TH AVE W UNIT 207 21617 80TH AVE W UNIT 208 EDMONDS, WA 98026-7805 EDMONDS, WA 98026 EDMONDS, WA 98026 0 v� 00679800020900 00679800021000 00679800021100 0 BELINA A TALBOT CARLEEN B GREENE KAREN M INGLESBY E OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER -0 w 21617 80TH AVE W UNIT 209 21615 80TH AVE W UNIT 210 21615 80TH AVE W UNIT 211 EDMONDS, WA 98026-7807 EDMONDS, WA 98026-7805 EDMONDS, WA 98026-7805 L m 00679800021200 00679800021300 00679800021400 JASON DETMER & KRISTIE BUSBY- DETMER THOMAS R ANDERSON HOWARD HAYDEN E OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 21617 80TH AVE W UNIT 212 21615 80TH AVE W UNIT 213 21617 80TH AVE W # 214 Z EDMONDS, WA 98026 EDMONDS, WA 98026-7805 EDMONDS, WA 98020 v r 00679800021500 00679800021600 00688400110100 Q YONG HEE KIM PATRICK & JANICE MCCLURE CINDY JOHNSON OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 21615 80TH AVE W # 215 21615 80TH AVE W #216 21107 80TH AVENUE W #101 EDMONDS, WA 98026 EDMONDS, WA 98026 EDMONDS, WA 98026 Q 00688400110200 00688400110200 00688400110300 EMILY L NOLAN EMILY L NOLAN DIANE MCCLENAHAN 7017 MARY AVE NW OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER SEATTLE, WA 98117 21107 80TH AVE W, UNIT 102 21107 80TH AVE W UNIT 103 EDMONDS, WA 98026 EDMONDS, WA 98026-7008 00688400110400 00720610010100 00720610010100 MICHAEL & KARA HECK MILLION F ASFAW MILLION F ASFAW 8206 184TH ST SW OR CURRENT OWNER 3031 NE 137TH ST, APT 221 EDMONDS, WA 98026 21120 77TH PL W UNIT 101 SEATTLE, WA 98125 EDMONDS, WA 98026 Packet Pg. 178 7.1.e 09L8/QCLLvl, AaaAV Dane 9lglledw00 ww L9 x ww 9Z Iewa01 ap ava8b133 fu9AV x ozls :8/o9G9@ glInn algitedwoo „8/9 Z „L lagi 00720610010200 00720610010300 00720610010400 N. TIEN KHOA; N. LONG; H. TUYET; N. TIMOTHY & ELISA DAUN DONNA L CARR TRONG KHOA 3409 171ST PLACE SE OR CURRENT OWNER 521 1ST AVE S BOTHELL, WA 98012 21120 77TH PL W UNIT 104 EDMONDS, WA 98020 EDMONDS, WA 98026-7166 00720620020100 00720620020200 00720620020300 WELLS CAROLYN WELLS MARITA FROST & MATTHEW CONWAY SARAH TABER OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 21118 77TH PL W, UNIT 201 21118 77TH PL W UNIT 202 21118 77TH PL W, UNIT 203 EDMONDS, WA 98026 EDMONDS, WA 98026 EDMONDS, WA 98026 0 .N L 00720630030100 00720630030200 00720530030300 c ANDREA KREIDLER LYLE & STEPHANIE WATERMAN DUSTIN LEE 0 OR CURRENT OWNER 14014 RIVIERA PL NE OR CURRENT OWNER 21116 77TH PL W UNIT 101 SEATTLE, WA 98125 21116 77TH PL W UNIT 303 0 H EDMONDS, WA 98026 EDMONDS, WA 98026-7148 r 00720630030400 00720640040100 00720640040200 m & STEPHANIE WATERMAN VICTORIA ALBANESE PAMELA K ROPPO U) 14014 RIVIERA PL NE OR CURRENT OWNER 814 PUGET WAY o SEATTLE, WA 98125 21114 77TH PL W UNIT 401 EDMONDS, WA 98020 0 t EDMONDS, WA 98026-7149 j 00720640040300 00720640040300 00720640040400 t 2 WILLIAM & CHRISTINE L OTANI WILLIAM & CHRISTINE L OTANI KENNETH R ROSE 20315 GREENWOOD AVE N OR CURRENT OWNER 3097 SHORELINE DR 3 SHORELINE, WA 98133 21114 77TH PL W UNIT 103 CAMANO ISLAND, WA 98282 0 0 EDMONDS, WA 98026 0 00720650050100 00720650050200 00720660060100 u� MARK A TORGERSON PAMELA A SANDERS ERIC A VAN HOOSER 0 OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER w 21112 77TH PL W, UNIT 501 21112 77TH PL W UNIT 102 21110 77TH PL W, UNIT 601 �- EDMONDS, WA 98026 EDMONDS, WA 98026 EDMONDS, WA 98026 2 00720660060200 00720670070100 00720670070200 m KIERAN L EDMUNDSON DANA H SENDERS RONALD & KATHLEEN INNES E OR CURRENT OWNER 2228 WESTWOOD BLVD #301 OR CURRENT OWNER c0i 21110 77TH PL W UNIT 602 LOS ANGELES, CA 90064 21108 77TH PL W UNIT 102 0 EDMONDS, WA 98026 EDMONDS, WA 98026 , v 00720670070300 00720670070400 00738800010100 r Q LYLE & STEPHANIE WATERMAN TIMOTHY MOEBES 7500 BUIPAG LLC 14014 RIVIERA PL NE 2910 LEONARD DR 2002 TH ST 5W SEATTLE, WA 98125 EVERETT, WA 98201-2547 LYINKWOOD, WA 98036 t m Q 00738800010200 00738800010300 00738800010400 7500 BUILDING LLC 7500 BUIL'p4G LLC 7S0D B ING LLC 2002 196TH ST SW 2002 1 H ST 5W 200 96TH ST SW LYNNWOOD, WA 98036 LYN OOD, WA 98036 LYNNWOOD, WA 98036 00738800010500 00738800010600 00738800010700 7500 BUILDI�I<ILLC 7500 BUI NG LLC 7500 BUI G LLC 2002 19 I ST SW 2002 6TH 5T SW 2002 TH ST SW LYN D1, WA 98036 LY WOOD, WA 98036 LY WOOD, WA 98036 Packet Pg. 179 09 L8/09199 tJ9AV aaAs agpdwoo ww L9 x ww 9Z Irmo; op ananbl33 8109 g@ AaanV qJIM algl;edwoo „8/9 Z x „L azls loq> 00738800010800 00738800010900 00738800011000 7500 BUI NG LLC 7500 BUI G LLC 7500 BUIL G LLC 2002 TH ST SW 2002 TH ST SW 2002 H ST 5W LYN OOD, WA 98036 LYNIqWOOD, WA 98036 LYNNWOOD, WA 98036 00738800011100 0073880 11200 00738800011300 7500 B ❑JNG LLC 7500 LDING LLC 7500eBDING LLC 200 96TIi ST SW 200 196TH ST SW20g. ST SW LYNNWOOD, WA 98036 L NWOOD, WA 98036 LYNNWOOD, WA 98036 00738800011400 00738800011500 00738800011600 LAGARCIA 19501 82ND LLC 7500 BUJ NG LLC 7500 BUI G LLC 7500 212TH ST SW UNIT 114 2002 TH ST SW 2003A46TH 5T SW EDMONDS, WA 98026-7615 LYN WOOD, WA 98036 LYNNWOOD, WA 98036 00738800011700 00738800011800 00738800020100 7500 BUILD G LLC 7500 BUILDING LLC 7500 BU1 NG LLC 2002 19fiT H ST SW 2002196T T SW 2002 6TH ST SW LYNN OOD, WA 98036 LYNN OD, WA 98036 LYNNWOOD, WA 98036 00738800020200 00738800020300 00738800020400 7500 BUIL�RNG LLC 7500 BUi ING LLC 7500 BU ING LLC 200219 H ST SW 2002 6TH 5T SW 2002 6TH ST SW LYNNWOOD, WA 98036 LYN WOOD, WA 98036 LYNNWOOD, WA 98036 00738800020500 00738800020600 00733800020700 7500 BUI ING LLC 7500 BUI ING LLC 7500 B ING LLC 2002 6TH ST SW 2002),56TH ST SW 200 96TH ST SW LYN WOOD, WA 98036 LYNNWOOD, WA 98036 LY NWOOD, WA 98036 00738800020800 00738800020900 00738900021000 7500 BUIL ING LLC 7500 BU iNG LLC 7500 B ING LLC 2002 1 HST 5W 200 6TH 5T SW 200 96TH ST SW LYN OOD, WA 98036 LYrfNWOOD, WA 98036 LY NWOOD, WA 98036 00738800 21100 00738800 21200 00738800 21300 7500 B LDING LLC 7500 LDING LLC 7500 §OLDING LLC 200 96TH ST SW 200 196TH ST SW 200 196TH ST SW LYNNWOOD, WA 98036 L NWOOD, WA 98036 LYNNWOOD, WA 98036 00738800021400 00738800021500 00738800021600 7500 1396ING LLC 7500 B DING LLC 7�NWOO LDING LLC 200 96TH ST SW 200 96TH 5T 5W 2196TH ST SW LY WOOD, WA 98036 LYNNWOOD, WA 98036 LD, WA 98036 Im 007388 0021700 00738800021800 00787400100100 7500 UILDING LLC 7500 BUI ING LLC STANLEY E EBERHARD, JR 20 196TH 5T SW 20021 TH ST SW OR CURRENT OWNER L NWOOD, WA 98036 LYNN OOD, WA 98036 21225 76TH AVE W UNIT A-1 EDMONDS, WA 980 Packet Pg. 180 00787400100200 TI LIU OR CURRENT OWNER 21225 76TH AVE W A2 EDMONDS, WA 98026 7.1.e 09Gg/po, q®IGanV oone opludwoo ww L9 x ww 9Z Iewiol op ap»nbll3 } ,9/091,9®ti9nV qj!M 9Igljetlwoo „q/g Z x „G ozls IagE 00787400100300 00787400100400 JESUS, EMMA, EMMA T & ANA SAHAGUN ROBERT D BILLINGTON & LISA SWINTON OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 21225 76TH AVE W #A3 21225 76TH AVE W UNIT 4 EDMONDS, WA 98026 EDMONDS, WA 98026 00787400100500 00787400100600 00787400200700 THERESA M BEAN SHAMILY SHARMA & VIKRANT MAYDENE PANG OR CURRENT OWNER MAKHNOTRA OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 21225 76TH AVE W A-5 21225 76TH AVE W UNITA-6 21227 76TH AVE W UNIT B-7 EDMONDS, WA 98026 EDMONDS, WA 98026-7516 EDMONDS, WA 98026-7513 00787400200800 00787400200900 00787400201000 THEODORE G JAQUITH BENNY Y MOY DAVID M WHITE OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 21227 76TH AVE W #13-8 21227 76TH AVE W UNIT B-9 21227 76TH AVE W UNIT 10 EDMONDS, WA 98026 EDMONDS, WA 98026-7513 EDMONDS, WA 98026 00787400301100 00787400301200 00799900010100 ROBERT AND MYRTLE JACK LIVING TRUST JULIEN K COLLINS BETTY LOWDON 21307 76TH AVE W UNIT 12 OR CURRENT OWNER PO BOX 3021 EDMONDS, WA 98026-7515 21229 76TH AVE W UNIT C12 LYNNWOOD, WA 98046 EDMONDS, WA 98026 00799900010200 00799900010300 00799900010400 JOHN A GAMLAM KIRK & JULIE BRADLEY DEIDRA A PARSINEN 127 SKYLINE DR OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER EDMONDS, WA 98020 7924 212TH ST SW UNIT 103 7924 212TH ST SW UNIT 104 EDMONDS, WA 98026 EDMONDS, WA 98026 00799900010500 00799900010600 00799900010700 EARLINE BOWEN, TRUSTEE JOHN O'SULLIVAN; THERESA TVEIT; REGINA MELISSA L HOEMAN 4015 164TH ST SW, SUITE 118 & JOHN O'SULLIVAN OR CURRENT OWNER LYNNWOOD, WA 98087 OR CURRENT OWNER 7924 212TH ST SW, UNIT 107 7924 212TH ST SW UNIT 106 EDMONDS, WA 98026 EDMONDS, WA 98026 00799900010800 00799900010900 00799900011000 ALAN D TAGLE MICHELE JOUBERT RON HAMMILL & ALICIA MCCULLOUGH 5002 152ND ST SW OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER EDMONDS, WA 98026 7924 212TH ST SW #109 7924 212TH ST SW, UNIT 110 EDMONDS, WA 98026 EDMONDS, WA 98026 00799900011100 00799900011200 00799900011200 CHASE E LINDER JIMMY LIU JIMMY LIU OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 12601 NE 154TH STREET 7924 212TH ST SW UNIT 111 7924 212TH ST SW UNIT 112 WOODINVILLE, WA 98072 EDMONDS, WA 98026 EDMONDS, WA 98026-7573 00799900011300 00799900011400 00799900020100 CHRISTINE G SCHILLEREFF SHELDON & CAROL O'DAHL ROSEMARY L OLSON OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 7924 212TH ST SW #113 7924 212TH ST SW UNIT 114 7924 212TH ST S W #201 EDMONDS, WA 98026 EDMONDS, WA 98026 EDMONDS, WA 98026 00799900020200 NANCY A CLARK OR CURRENT OWNER 7924 212TH AVE SW #202 EDMONDS, WA 98026 00799900020300 WILLIAM ORTIZ OR CURRENT OWNER 7924 212TH ST SW UNIT 203 EDMONDS, WA 98026-7574 Q 00799900020400 DONALD PIERCY TRUSTEE 733 MELODY LANE EDMONDS, WA 98020 Packet Pg. 181 09 LS/Op 19® fJ9AV oaAU appdwoo ww L9 x ww gZ lewaol op pgnbiq 7.1.e .9/09Lgo fjoAV gllm aigiledwoo ,,8/g Z x ,, L azis Iagt 00799900020500 00799900020600 00799900020700 ZACHARY MULLINS PATRICIA TWITCH ELL JAMES & DIANE F DODSON OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 7924 212TH ST SW #205 7924 212TH ST SW UNIT 206 7924 212TH ST SW #207 EDMONDS, WA 98026 EDMONDS, WA 98026-7574 EDMONDS, WA 98026 00799900020800 00799900020900 00799900021000 JOHN RAJHICH & REBECCA DICKEY REEVES THOMAS REEVES SANDRAJ BOWERS OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 7924 212TH ST SW UNIT 208 7924 212TH ST SW #209 7924 212TH ST SW #210 EDMONDS, WA 98026 EDMONDS, WA 98026 EDMONDS, WA 98020 0 N L 00799900021100 00799900021200 00799900021300 > c CLAUDINE PRUITT & TERRY FOWLER MARY C JATON & BRENDAN EYMAN RYU & BI CORPORATION 0 V OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 30640 PACIFIC HWY S # E-6 7924 212TH ST SW UNIT 211 7924 212TH STREET SW UNIT 212 FEDERAL WAY, WA 98003 3 I- EDMONDS, WA 98026-7575 EDMONDS, WA 98026 V m t 00799900021300 00799900021400 00799900030100 RYU & BI CORPORATION MARGARET A DRISCOLL MARIA BALAREZO >' PO BOX 83585 OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 0 SEATTLE, WA 98145 7924 212TH ST SW UNIT 214 7924 212TH ST SW APT 301 0 t EDMONDS, WA 98026 EDMONDS, WA 98026 t 00799900030200 00799900030300 00799900030400 RAMIZ & SABINA BAJROVIC THOMAS & HEIKE PARDUN CODYJ DANSON OR CURRENT OWNER PO BOX 2986 OR CURRENT OWNER 3 7924 212TH ST SW UNIT 302 SPOKANE, WA 99220 7924 212TH ST SW UNIT 304 0 EDMONDS, WA 98026 EDMONDS, WA 98026 0 00799900030500 00799900030600 00799900030700 BI CORPORATION RYU WILLIAM W KARGER CHRISTOPHER & DEBRA LEE-RIZZI 0 30640 PACIFIC HWY S # E-6 OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER w FEDERAL WAY, WA 98003 7924 212TH ST SW UNIT 306 7924 212TH ST SW UNIT 307 EDMONDS, WA 98026 EDMONDS, WA 98026 L 00799900030800 00799900030900 00799900031000 MARGARET RIORDAN KOSES SIVAKUA SIGMUND ANDREASSEN E OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 101 NICKERSON STE 340 7924 212TH ST SW UNIT 308 7924 212TH ST SW UNIT 309 SEATTLE, WA 98109 0 EDMONDS, WA 98026-7577 EDMONDS, WA 98026-7577 v r 00799900031000 00799900031100 00799900031200 Q SIGMUND ANDREASSEN DIONISIOS & JOANNA PLARINOS CREIGHTON KOLBECK OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 14328 EDGEWATER LN NE 7924 212TH ST SW, #310 7924 212TH ST SW UNIT 311 SEATTLE, WA 98125 EDMONDS, WA 98026 EDMONDS, WA 98026-7577 m Q 00799900031200 00799900031300 00799900031400 CREIGHTON KOLBECK CHERI MOY CAROLE BRAND & DEANNA SMYTH OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 8125 212TH ST SW, UNIT 9 7924 212TH ST SW UNIT 313 7924 212TH ST SW UNIT 314 EDMONDS, WA 98026 EDMONDS, WA 98026-7577 EDMONDS, WA 98026-7577 00826500000100 00826500000200 00826500000300 LAUREL A DEFRANG-PETERSON STEVEN CHERKAS NIGEL QUARRLES OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 21325 76TH AVE W UNIT Al 21325 76TH AVE W # A2 21325 76TH AVE W UNIT A3 EDMONDS, WA 98026-7511 EDMONDS, WA 98026 EDMONDS, WA 980 Packet Pg. 182 00826500000400 LYALL & CLAUDIA J HOY OR CURRENT OWNER 21325 76TH AVE W # A 4 EDMONDS, WA 98026 00826500000600 DIEU DO HANG 104 E LYNN CREEK DR ARLINGTON, TX 76002 00826500000800 COLIN W HUTCHINSON-FLAMING OR CURRENT OWNER 21327 76TH AVE W UNIT B8 EDMONDS, WA 98026 00826500001000 NEIL R SMITH OR CURRENT OWNER 21329 76TH AVE W UNIT C10 EDMONDS, WA 98026-7534 00835864102300 CHARLES WILLIAM DEGOOYER 736 S GEORGIA ST KENNEWICK, WA 99336 00835864102500 STACEE L ROBINSON OR CURRENT OWNER 21109 77TH PL W UNIT 25 EDMONDS, WA 98026 00835874301800 ANDRY RACHMAT OR CURRENT OWNER 21113 77TH PL W UNIT 18 EDMONDS, WA 98026-7154 00835874302100 CHRISTINE A IRWIN OR CURRENT OWNER 21113 77TH PL W UNIT 21 EDMONDS, WA 98026-7154 00835874500900 EDWARD CARDIFF 10014 238TH ST SW EDMONDS, WA 98020 00835874501200 RANDALL S DARBY OR CURRENT OWNER 21117 77TH PL W UNIT 12 EDMONDS, WA 98026-7153 7.1.e 0919/Op' 9® AjoAV ow opitdwoo ww Zg x ww 9Z 17awao; op p nbl13 .8/0919® A19AV g}!m algpdwoo „8/9 Z x „G ozls Iegt 00826500000400 00826500000500 LYALL & CLAUDIA J HOY POUL & CECILIA N PEDERSEN 6501181ST ST SW OR CURRENT OWNER LYNNWOOD, WA 98037 21327 W 76TH AVE #13-5 EDMONDS, WA 98026 00826500000600 DIEU DO HANG 14002 64TH AVE W EDMONDS, WA 98026 00826500000900 JOSEPH T HIGGS 17408 SE 196TH DR RENTON, WA 98058 00826500001100 STELLA MORENO OR CURRENT OWNER 21329 76TH AVE W UNIT C11 EDMONDS, WA 98026-7534 00835864102300 CHARLES WILLIAM DEGOOYER OR CURRENT OWNER 21109 77TH PL W, UNIT 23 EDMONDS, WA 98026 00826500000700 YONGGUN KIM OR CURRENT OWNER 21327 76TH AVE W UNIT B7 EDMONDS, WA 98026 00826500000900 JOSEPH T HIGGS 16046 SE 173RD ST RENTON, WA 98058 00826500001200 ANA GLORIA LEMOINE OR CURRENT OWNER 21329 76TH AVE W #C12 EDMONDS, WA 98026 00835864102400 CRAIG & CINDY HEIGERT OR CURRENT OWNER 21109 77TH PL W UNIT 24 EDMONDS, WA 98026-7155 00835864102600 00835874301700 MICHAELE TURBAK & PATRICIA CONGER HEIDI DAUENHAUER & JUDITH & ROBE[ 2114143RD PL SE ANDERSON MILL CREEK, WA 98012 8522 NE POINT NO POINT RD HANSVILLE, WA 98340 00835874301900 LAWRENCE MERRIMAN OR CURRENT OWNER 21113 77TH PL W UNIT 19 EDMONDS, WA 98026-7154 00835874302200 ARBOR LANE LLC 2231198TH AVE W EDMONDS, WA 98020 00835874501000 MORGAN WILLIAMS & AMY KUH PO BOX 132 EDMONDS, WA 98020 00835874501300 TRI TRAN OR CURRENT OWNER 21117 77TH PL E #13 EDMONDS, WA 98026 00835874302000 GERGO HEGYI OR CURRENT OWNER 21113 77TH PL W UNIT 20 EDMONDS, WA 98026-7154 00835874500900 EDWARD CARDIFF OR CURRENT OWNER 21117 77TH PL W UNIT 9 EDMONDS, WA 98026-7163 00835874501100 APRIL BETH HORN OR CURRENT OWNER 21117 77TH PLACE W #11 EDMONDS, WA 98026 �L m E a� 0 Z v r r Q :.o c a� E t m Q 00835874501400 JIANGUO XY 22306 68TH PL W MOUNTLAKE TERRACE, WA 98043-2386 Packet Pg. 183 09 G8/Oa.LS®(uaAV 39AE opliadwoo ww A x ww 5z lumol op pobi33 7.1.e AjoAV ql!m oIq}ledwoo ,,8/g z x ,.l ozis loq[ 00835874501400 00835874501500 00835874501600 XIAO CAI & JIANGOU XU BRUCE L MURPHY JULIANA SANTOS & CESAR MENON OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 21117 77TH PL W, UNIT 14 21117 77TH PL W UNIT 15 21117 77TH PL W UNIT 16 EDMONDS, WA 98026 EDMONDS, WA 98026-7153 EDMONDS, WA 98026 00835874700100 00835874700200 00835874700300 PAUL G HANSON III Y T LISANEWORK & HELINA BIRUK ALLISON SEIELSTAD OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 21121 77TH PL W UNIT 1 21121 77TH PLACE W UNIT 2 21121 77TH PL W UNIT 3 EDMONDS, WA 98026-7127 EDMONDS, WA 98026 EDMONDS, WA 98026 0 N L 00835874700400 00835874700500 00835874700600 o SHERRIE L HEGINBOTHAM JOY LYN GARDNER RICKY KURNIAWAN V OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 21121 77TH PL W UNIT 4 21121 77TH PL W UNIT 5 21121 77TH PL W UNIT 6 H EDMONDS, WA 98026 EDMONDS, WA 98026-7127 EDMONDS, WA 98026-7133 r m t 00835874700700 00835874700800 00861530700900 VICKIE KUHNHAUSEN EDWARD & CHRISTINE CLOUDY JEANNE A HECKER v) OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER o 21121 77TH PL W UNIT 7 921 12TH AVE N 21307 76TH AVE W #9 EDMONDS, WA 98026 EDMONDS, WA 98020 EDMONDS, WA 98026 to t 00861530701000 00861530701100 00861530701200 COLLEEN A MCDONOUGH DENNIS WHEELER & MICHELE QUINN ROBER & MYRTLE LIVING TRUST OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 21307 76TH AVE W UNIT 10 21307 76TH AVE W UNIT 11 21307 76TH AVE W UNIT 12 0 EDMONDS, WA 98026-7515 EDMONDS, WA 98026-7515 EDMONDS, WA 98026-7515?� u� 00861531100100 00861531100200 00861531100300 0 WILLIAM L SINCLAIR PATRICE CASE SANDRA DANIELS LIVING TRUST E OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER w 21311 76TH AVE W UNIT 1 21311 76TH AVE W UNIT 2 21311 76TH AVE W UNIT 3 N EDMONDS, WA 98026-7544 EDMONDS, WA 98026-7544 EDMONDS, WA 98026-7544 m L 00861531100400 00861531100500 00861531100600 EDWARD & ELEANOR SCHWEIHS WALTER J BREHM LINDA L NACHIEM E OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 2 21311 76TH AVE W UNIT 4 21311 76TH AVE W UNIT 5 21311 76TH AVE W UNIT 6 0 Z EDMONDS, WA 98026-7544 EDMONDS, WA 98026-7544 EDMONDS, WA 98026-7544 v r r 00861531100700 00861531100700 00861531100800 Q MICHAEL BORUGIAN MICHAEL & MARYLYN BORUGIAN LAWRENCE & DOROTHY HALL 6591 NORTHPOINT OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER TROY, MI 48085 21311 76TH AVE W UNIT 7 21311 76TH AVE W UNIT 8 EDMONDS, WA 98026-7544 EDMONDS, WA 98026-7544 m Q 00875400000100 00875400000200 00875400000300 CHARLES R MAYS PAUL & SARA M ODHIAMBO TATYANA MOSINA OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 21317 76TH AVE W UNIT 1 21317 76TH AVE W UNIT 2 21317 76TH AVE W UNIT 3 EDMONDS, WA 98026-7524 EDMONDS, WA 98026-7524 EDMONDS, WA 98026-7524 00875400000400 00875400000500 00875400000600 JANICE C ANDERSON ERIC & KATHERINE HOLCK ROBERTJORGENSEN, III OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 21317 76TH AVENUE W # 4 21315 76TH AVE W UNIT 5 21315 76TH AVE W UNIT 6 EDMONDS, WA 98020 EDMONDS, WA 98026 EDMONDS, WA 980 Packet Pg. 184 7.1.e 09G8/O0l.r, AGaAV oane a€glledwoo ww L9 x ww 9Z Imlol ap 931anb€13 .810919® AaaAV t€11na slgg�dwoo „9/9 Z x „I. ozis lags WA 00875400000700 00875400000800 00875400000900 NANCY HOOD CAROL KENNARD BUCHHOLZ FAMILY TRUST OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 21315 76TH AVE W UNIT 7 21315 76TH AVE W UNIT 8 21313 76TH AVE W UNIT 9 EDMONDS, WA 98026-7523 EDMONDS, WA 98026 EDMONDS, WA 98026-7522 00875400001000 00875400001100 00875400001200 NANCY ENGEL NURYATI L DUDLEY ALEXANDER PIERCE OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 21313 76TH AVE W UNIT 10 21313 76TH AVE W UNIT 11 21313 76TH AVE W UNIT 12 EDMONDS, WA 98026-7522 EDMONDS, WA 98026-7522 EDMONDS, WA 98026-7522 0 N L 00930890100100 00930890100200 00930890100300 a c CHRISTOPHER GROSS JENNIFER A LAYER JEFFREY & MAGEN BYRD V OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER `t 7901212TH ST SW UNIT 1 7901212TH ST SW UNIT 2 7901212TH ST SW UNIT #3 H EDMONDS, WA 98026 EDMONDS, WA 98020 EDMONDS, WA 98026 r m t 00930890300100 00930890300200 00930890300300 WILLIAM & MICHELLE S GOODMAN KALERIYA MASLYAK ABBIE WHITE to 20622 MAPLEWOOD DRIVE OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER o EDMONDS, WA 98026 7903 212TH ST SW UNIT 2 7903 212TH ST SW # 3 EDMONDS, WA 98026 EDMONDS, WA 98026-7519 to t 00930890500100 00930890500200 00930890500300 VALARIE R APODACA ALAN BINE & SONDRA PADGETT ROBIN S DORITY OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 7905 212TH ST SW UNIT 1 7905 212TH AVE SW UNIT 2 7905 212TH ST SW UNIT 3 0 EDMONDS, WA 98026-7530 EDMONDS, WA 98026 EDMONDS, WA 98026 ?� u� 01013300010100 01013300010200 01013300010300 0 JANET L ROGERS MIWA S LIM GUNNAR & DEBORAH BERG ;_ OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER w w 2150180TH AVE W UNIT 101 2150180TH AVE W UNIT 102 2150180TH AVE W UNIT 103 T EDMONDS, WA 98026-7470 EDMONDS, WA 98026 EDMONDS, WA 98026 m L 01013300020100 01013300020200 01013300020300 E YOUNG KIM & SOOK SANG LAURA CAPARROSO MATT & ANDREA RENOUARD E OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 21503 80TH AVE W UNIT 201 21503 80TH AVE W UNIT 202 21503 80TH AVE W UNIT 203 O Z EDMONDS, WA 98026-7471 EDMONDS, WA 98026-7471 EDMONDS, WA 98026-7471 v r r 27043000100300 27043000100400 27043000100500 Q RONALD B SINCLAIR ELENA NEWMAN ROBERT & KRISTIN M PAINTER 20029 24TH AVE 23308 96TH AVE W OR CURRENT OWNER SEATTLE, WA 98155 EDMONDS, WA 98020-5008 21616 80TH AVE W EDMONDS, WA 98026 m Q 27043000104800 27043000105100 27043000105500 SCHOOL DIST 15 EDMONDS NORWEGIAN WOOD LLC STEVE FREIR1C PROPERTIES LLC 3, 20420 68TH AVE W PO BOX 177 21320 H AVE W STE 101 LYNNWOOD, WA 98036-7405 LYNNWOOD, WA 98046 ED ONDS, WA 98026 27043000105600 27043000105700 27043000105800 STEVE FREIMARK PROPERTIES LLC STEVE FREIMARK OPERTIES LLC STEVE FREIM ROPERTIES LLC 21323 80TH AVE W STE 101 21323 80TH W STE 101 21323 80 AVE W STE 101 EDMONDS, WA 98026 EDMONDS, A 98026 EDM S, WA 98026 Packet Pg. 185 OgLg/9aL5o tiaAV oane algltedwaa ww Lg x ww gZ tewaot ap a}�anbit3 LS/Og Lg, fu@AV 41IM alg!ILdwoo „8/g Z x ,, L ozls lap: i" 27043000105900 STEVE FREIMARK OPERTIES LLC 21323 80TH, 0TH W STE 101 EDMOND , A 98026 27043000106300 21409LLC 8720 NE 133RD PL KIRKLAND, WA 98034 27043000109100 MAMIE JALLOW & RAFAL FOLTYNSKI 1839 NE 172ND ST SEATTLE, WA 98155 27043000106000 STEVE FREIMA5K PROPERTIES LLC 21323 801VE W STE 101 EDMONdS, WA 98026 27043000108800 CHRISTINE MILLER OR CURRENT OWNER 21415 80TH AVE W EDMONDS, WA 98020 27043000109100 MAMIE JALLOW & RAFAL FOLTYNSKI OR CURRENT OWNER 21419 80TH AVE W EDMONDS, WA 98026 27043000106100 FREIMARK PRO ERTIES LLC 21323 80 AVE W STE 101 EDMPKDS, WA 98026 27043000109000 MARCUS COMER & ELIZA MARTIN OR CURRENT OWNER 21417 80TH AVE W EDMONDS, WA 98026 Packet Pg. 186 7.1.e FILE NO.: PLN20180014-0017 APPLICANT: ESD DECLARATION OF MAILING NOTICE OF APPLICATION On the 16 day of April, 2018, the attached Notice of Application was mailed by the City to property owners within 300 feet of the property that is the subject of the above -referenced application. I, Denise Nelson, hereby declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that the foregoing is true and correct this 14 day of April, 2018 at Edmonds, Washington. Signed: -& {BFP747887.DOC;1\00006.900000\ } Packet Pg. 187 7.1.e File No.: PLN20180014 - PLN20180017 Applicant: Edmonds School District DECLARATION OF POSTING On the 16th day of April, 2018, the attached Notice of Application and Comment Period was posted as prescribed by Ordinance and in any event where applicable on or near the subject property. I, Michael D. Clugston, hereby declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that the foregoing is true and correct this 16th day of April, 2018, at Edmonds, Washington. Signed:r � z. ,, Packet Pg. 188 7.1.e CLASSIFIED ADVERTISING PROOURECEIPT CITY OF EDMONDS NOTICE OF APPLICATION PROJECT DESCRIPTION; The EdmonUS School District No. 15 (Dist( iCly is proposing ude to the oldallng baseball and soccer t gilds and tennis pgraeeusls el Edmond.-Woadway Hlgh School. Phase of tno proposed p,o,oz, Includes a relocated storage GuiEdln9 and three SSOrage conlalners north of Sn8 baseball (laid. A so proposed la an are& for jiavelin and di$cUe west of Iha 4aseball f1e17, a 5yynnthetiC lurl mulilpurp0se baa9ba{� livid with foolhalllsoecer la d;and associated 11Ohting,, and bullpens. In additlon, tour tennis dellrlS land asa0clui[ed IEgrilingj ertl proposed oasl of iho oaseball (lBld. rse Oaltmgg Cages Srp proposed south o1 lire tennis Courts. A portion oflwo Isnnls Courts dIraCtty north and one tennis court east of 01) existing baseball held would be demolished to accammndale the Improvements. Phase I is expected to occur duringq Iha 5ummar and fall of 2018. It addliional Iunding becomes avallabla, Phaso II of she prd•ect would include the installation of an unlighlad natural lur�foelbalt and soccer livid west OF the proposed baseball Gold:.sepsrate land use and building pormlla would be PROJECT LOCATtONc76D0 212th Street SW ;rax ID N:27043v00i04800] NAh1E CF APPLICANT: Edmonds Schad District trap, D.A.4louan 6 Associates and Shodwy Planningg Group} FILE NUBME VPLN20180014;Ooslgrl eYlew},PLN2 180016 tCondlil" Use Permit - bleachers, playtlold lighling, structures FL20{Vs[Variance - structures 80'tel),N180017 aadafte noelSeaa&at216th Street) A.PLOTION:DATE OF Match 61 2018 DATE OF COMPLETENESS: Appdt 2.2018 DATE OF NOTICE: Apr816. 2018 REQUESTED PERMITS: Archilectural Design Board Review, CwWelonal Use Pernik, IMm Varkancos OTHER REQUIRED PERMITS: Building permits REQUIRED STUDIES' WA EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS: SEPA CAackllSt and Determination. Critical Area Cha&Rat, Geolochnlcal Report, Slnrmwaler Report COMMENTS ON PROPOSAL DUE' May 1, 2018 CITY CONTACT: Mike Clugston, ASCR Associate Planner michael�k2kron@edmondswa.gov 42&771.022a bllgrn£t£ April 16, 2018. EDH804230 Packet Pg. 189 7.1.e Everett Daily Herald Affidavit of Publication State of Washington } County of Snohomish } ss Dicy Sheppard being first duly sworn, upon oath deposes and says: that he/she is the legal representative of the Everett Daily Herald a daily newspaper. The said newspaper is a legal newspaper by order of the superior court in the county in which it is published and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of the first publication of the Notice hereinafter referred to, published in the English language continually as a daily newspaper in Snohomish County, Washington and is and always has been printed in whole or part in the Everett Daily Herald and is of general circulation in said County, and is a legal newspaper, in accordance with the Chapter 99 of the Laws of 1921, as amended by Chapter 213, Laws of 1941, and approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of Snohomish County, State of Washington, by order dated June 16, 1941, and that the annexed is a true copy of EDH804230 PLN20180014-17 as it was published in the regular and entire issue of said paper and not as a supplement form thereof for a period of 1 issue(s), such publication commencing on 04/16/2018 and ending on 04/16/2018 and that said newspaper was regularly distributed to its subscribers during all of said period. The amount of the fee for such publication is $75.68. Subscribed and sworn befog --,me on this day of r N Public in and for the State o Washington. City of Edmonds - LEGAL ADS 114101416 DIANE CUNNINGHAM R 1 ink$ Phillips Notary public My qp State of Washington pvrrnmerrr ExA1res pa'29)202 Packet Pg. 190 7.1.e CITY OF EDMONDS NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING OF THE ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN BOARD `') c. 1 S9•, PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The Edmonds School District No. 15 (District) is proposing upgrade to the existing baseball and soccer fields and tennis courts at Edmonds-Woodway High School. Phase I of the proposed project includes a relocated storage building and three storage containers north of the baseball field. Also proposed is an area for javelin and discus, west of the baseball field, a synthetic turf multipurpose baseball field with football/soccer field (and associated lighting) and bullpens. In addition, four tennis courts (and associated lighting) are proposed east of the baseball field. Three batting cages are proposed south of the tennis courts. A portion of two tennis courts directly north and one tennis court east of the existing baseball field would be demolished to accommodate the improvements. If additional funding becomes available, Phase II of the project would include the installation of an unlighted natural turf football and soccer field west of the proposed baseball field; separate land use and building permits would be required for that work. PROJECT LOCATION: 7600 212th Street SW (Tax ID #: 27043000104800) NAME OF APPLICANT: Edmonds School District (rep. D.A. Hogan & Associates and Shockey Planning Group) FILE NUMBER: PLN20180014 (Design Review) DATE OF NOTICE: July 18, 2018 OTHER REQUESTED OR REQUIRED PERMITS: PLN20180015 (Conditional Use Permit — bleachers, playfield lighting, structures over 25' tall), PLN20180016 (Variance — structures over 60' tall), PLN20180017 (Variance — street setback at 2161h Street); building permits PUBLIC MEETING INFORMATION: A public meeting will be held by the Architectural Design Board on August 1, 2018 at 7 p.m. in the Council Chambers located at 250-5th Avenue North, Edmonds, WA 98020. No public comment will be taken at the Architectural Design Board meeting; the Hearing Examiner will take testimony during a public hearing which will be noticed separately once a date has been determined. Any person has the right to comment on this application during public comment period, receive notice and participate in any hearings, and request a copy of the decision on the application. The City may accept public comments at any time prior to the closing of the record of an open record predecision hearing, if any, or, if no open record predecision hearing is provided, prior to the decision on the project permit. Only parties of record as defined in ECDC 20.07.003 have standing to initiate an administrative appeal. Information on this project can be viewed or obtained at the City of Edmonds Development Services Department, 121 5th Ave North, Edmonds, WA 98020 between the hours of 8:00 A.M. and 4:30 P.M. Monday — Friday (8:30 A.M. to 12:00 P.M. only on Wednesdays) or online through the City's website at www.edmondswa.g through the Online Permit Info link. Search for permit PLN20180014. CITY CONTACT: Mike Clugston, AICP, Senior Planner michael.clugston@edmondswa.gov 425-771-0220 Packet Pg. 191 7.1.e FILE NO.: PLN20180014 APPLICANT: EWHS DECLARATION OF MAILING NOTICE OF APPLICATION On the 18 day of July, 2018, the attached Notice of Application was mailed by Click -to -mail to property owners within 300 feet of the property that is the subject of the above -referenced application. I. Diane Cunningham, hereby declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that the foregoing is true and correct this 18 day of July, 2018 at Edmonds, Washington. Signed: {BFP747887.DOC;1\00006.900000\ } Packet Pg. 192 7.1.e FILE NO.: PLN20180014 Applicant: Edmonds School District DECLARATION OF POSTING On the July 18, 2018, the attached Notice of Public Meeting was posted at the subject property, Civic Hall, Library and Public Safety buildings. I, Michael D. Clugston, hereby declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that the foregoing is true and correct this 18th day of July, 2018, at Edmonds, Washington. Signed: C� {BFP747893.DOC;1\00006.900000\ } Packet Pg. 193 7.1.e Classified Proof CITY OF EDMONDS NOTICE: OF PUBLIC ff4EETING OF THE ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN BOARD PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The Edmartdq SClwal District No. 15 (Dtatrldo Is prpposlny upgrade la the existing baseball and succor fields and tormi$ tour% st Edmands-WOndw High School. Phase I of Me prdposad pra]eet 14xkldes o m cater storage bu[Mripi and three eiorago containers north of the basebau Mid, Elsa proposed Is an area for javelin and discus, west or the baseball told, a !lynlhalic brit murtlpunpasv baseball ftold with molbalVooccer field (and aasoclated lighting) and butlpanv.1n addlllon, four ttnnts Cours (and associated lighting) are proposed east of the basshati field. TIv68 belongg cages are proposed eoulh 01 the tennis touts. A portion OZ Iwo tennla eoure. directly heirth and one tennis court east of the existlr9 baseball eeld would be demollinsd to a0commdO818 the improvemums. If additional turdng becomoe eveilablo, Phase It of I" prolec! wound Include the Inslsllaeon of an unlighted natural turf football and soccer field west of the proposed baaabatl meld; aepera(a land use and building permits would be required for that work, PROJECT LOCATION: 7W 272th Street SW [fax ID d' 27043DOO104000) NAME OF APPLICANT: Edmonds School District (rep. D.A. Hogan A Aseddatas and Sharkey Planning Group) FILE NUMBER! PLN20180014 (Design Review) DATE OF NOTICE: July 18, 2018 OTHER RE1QUESTED OR REQUIRED PERLtIT5; PLN20180015 (Conditfonal Use Permit - bleachers, playfietd lightng. Oluclums mar 25' hraj, PLN2O1SWIS (Variance - structures over W Oall). PLN20100017 (Variance - street setback at 21611h Sires , budding parmHs PUBLIC MEETING INFORMATICN: A publk meeting will be held by the Archites two Design Board art August t. 2018 at 7 p.m. In IN Council Chambers located at 250.51h Avenue North, Edmonds, WA g802o. No public Comment vAl be taken at the Architectural Design Board mooing: tho Hearing Examiner will take testunony ("Ing a putslk hearing which will be noticed geparotely once a dale has been determined. FA person has the rpht to comment an this applicabon during Ik Comment period, racerve notice and participate In Orly earinggs, and request a copy of the decision on gte appllca8on. The City may accept pulok comments at any time prior to ote closing of the record of an open record prodatision hand", I Nu cr. 11 re. red open record puclstan hearing is provided, Prior decision on the proEect permit. Only partiea or record as defined In ECDC 2D.07-003 have am ndllg to intoate an admimbatrve appeal. Inromn Won on thipps profact Can b0 vlowpaaed of pbWned at the Meal Edmonds, WA 9 20 belwelent enn theohaut3 of 6 00 A.MAand North, P.M. MarMay - r6cley (a:30 A.M. to 12:oo P.M. only an wednesdaya) or online through the Cltyls wob54e at www. m0ndsw M wgh Iris OnYno Permit into Ilnk, Search orpermll LN20f 14. CITY CONTACT: Mike Ckugstori,AICP, Senior Planner m1chael.clugg8lonaed mondswa.gov 425.771-0220 Published: July 18. 2Df8 EDH817332 14 4+ Z a E M a Proofed by Sheppard, Dicy, 07/18/2018 08:29:27 am Page: 2 Packet Pg. 194 7.1.e Everett Daily Herald Affidavit of Publication State of Washington } County of Snohomish } ss Dicy Sheppard being first duly sworn, upon oath deposes and says: that he/she is the legal representative of the Everett Daily Herald a daily newspaper. The said newspaper is a legal newspaper by order of the superior court in the county in which it is published and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of the first publication of the Notice hereinafter referred to, published in the English language continually as a daily newspaper in Snohomish County, Washington and is and always has been printed in whole or part in the Everett Daily Herald and is of general circulation in said County, and is a legal newspaper, in accordance with the Chapter 99 of the Laws of 1921, as amended by Chapter 213, Laws of 1941, and approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of Snohomish County, State of Washington, by order dated June 16, 1941, and that the annexed is a true copy of EDH817332 PLN20180014 as it was published in the regular and entire issue of said paper and not as a supplement form thereof for a period of 1 issue(s), such publication commencing on 07/18/2018 and ending on 07/18/2018 and that said newspaper was regularly distributed to its subscribers during all of said period. The amount of the fee for such publication is $99.7 LA shomal/ Subscribed and sworn laefpre me on this Jday of y r� N Public :i-and for the State of Washington. City or Edmonds - LEGAL ADS 114101416 DIANE CUNNINGHAM Linda Phillips _ • • State of �j PuiNic MyAppolnlmenl a moires e,$0ton +081291i02T Packet Pg. 195 7.1.f CITY OF EDMONDS — PLANNING DIVISION k STAFF COMMENT FORM 8 PW-Engineering ® Fire ❑ PW - Maintenance 8 Building Project Number: PLN20180014 - PLN20180017 Applicant's Name: EDMONDS - WOODWAY HIGH SCHOOL Property Location: 7600 212TH ST SW Date Application Received: 03.05.18 Date Application Routed: 03.08.18 Zoning: PUBLIC (P) Project Description. **ALL PLANS ARE ATTACHED IN PLN20180017** PLN20180014 - DESIGN REVIEW PLN20180015 - CU FOR SCHOOL IN P ZONE PLN20180016 - HEIGHT VARIANCE PLN20180017 - SETBACK VARIANCE If you have any questions or need clarification on this project, please contact: Responsible Staff: MIKE CLUGSTON Ext. 1330 Name of Individual Submitting Comments: Karl Fitterer Title: Deputy Fire Marshal 8 I have reviewed this land use proposal for my department and I do not have any comments. My department may also review this project during the building permit process (if applicable) and reserves the right to provide additional comments at that time. Date: 03/27/2018 ❑ I have reviewed this land use proposal for my department and have the following comments or conditions: Attachment 5 PLN20180014 c a� E 0 .E z U a� H LO r Q c W E z U 2 Q Packet Pg. 196 7.1.f CITY OF EDMONDS - PLANNING DIVISION STAFF COMMENT FORM ❑ PW-Engineering ❑ Fire ❑ PW - Maintenance ® Bullding Project Number: PLN20180014 - PLN20180017 Applicant's Name: EDMONDS - WOODWAY HIGH SCHOOL Property Location: 7600 212TH ST SW Date Application Received: 03.05.18 Date Application Routed: Zoning: PUBLIC (P) Project Description: **ALL PLANS ARE ATTACHED IN PLN20180017** PLN20180014 - DESIGN REVIEW PLN20180015 - CU FOR SCHOOL IN P ZONE PLN20180016 - HEIGHT VARIANCE PLN20180017 - SETBACK VARIANCE If you have any questions or need clarification on this project, please contact: Responsible Staff: MIKE CLUGSTON Ext. 1330 ,..,.--_--_.----------------,-.—_---- Name of Individual Submitting Comments: LEIF BJORBACK V* Title: BUILDING OFFICIAL ® 1 have reviewed this land use proposal for my department and 1 do not have any comments. My department may also review this project during the building permit process (if applicable) and reserves the right to provide additional comments at that time. Date: 4/2/2018 ❑ 1 have reviewed this land use proposal for my department and have the following comments or conditions: Construction shall meet all applicable building codes and will be reviewed for such under the building permit application. Packet Pg. 197 7.1.f ly0 STORMWATER REVIEW COMMENTS City of Edmonds 1g„ Engineering Division To: Engineering Reviewer Date: 6/21 /2018 Project Name: Woodway High School Field Improvements Permit Number: PLN20180014 Address: 7600 212th St SW Review Type: Preliminary/Feasibility Submittal Date: 5/14/2018 (& 6/21/2018 follow-up meeting) Reviewer: Zack Richardson, PE City of Edmonds, Stormwater Engineer Recommendation: I recommend that PLN20180014 be approved with conditions to comply with ECDC 18.30 and Ord. 4097. Revisions are required prior to construction approval (issuance of building permit) as noted below. Prior Construction Approval: y The following comments were noted by the reviewer as issues that will require revision prior to construction approval, but do not necessarily required attention prior to feasibility approval. E 1. The pervious pavements may remain as modelled (50/50) provided that any underdrain is elevated above the bottom of base course to promote infiltration. 2. The applicant has verbally stated that no work to add impervious surfaces that were not fully permitted and mitigated through the City has occurred; it is believe that the retrofit requirement will not impact the project, but the applicant must stillLO ~ provide written documentation of this. 3. Grading and drainage plans must be stamped and signed by the overseeing civil Q engineer prior to construction approval (electrical engineer needs to sign electrical plans too). 4. CB #13 now appears to be just barely over 5' from invert to top; add notes or update plans as needed to reflect need for Type 2 if invert found to be more than a 5' from rim elevation (or conduct pothole prior finalizing design). Page 1 of 1 Packet Pg. 198 7.1.f Date: To: From: Subject: MEMORANDUM June 25, 2018 Mike Clugston, Senior Planner Jeanie McConnell, Engineering Program Manager Zachary Richardson, Stormwater Engineer PLN20180014-15-16-17 — Design Review, CU, Variances Edmonds Woodway Fields — 21600 76" Ave W Engineering has reviewed the subject application and found the information provided is consistent with Title 18 Edmonds Community Development Code & Engineering standards. It is requested that the following be included as a condition of project approval. Compliance with Engineering codes and construction standards will be reviewed with the building permit application for development of the site. Approval of the design review phase of the project does not constitute approval of the improvements as shown on the submitted plans. A right-of-way dedication will be required at the building permit phase of this project to clear up an existing right-of-way/parcel bouncary discrepancy. This plans submitted for the current phase of the project has accurately accounted for this area as right-of-way. Thank you. City of Edmonds c as E 0 U as r Q c W E U 2 a Packet Pg. 199 Packet Pg. 200 7.1.g July 22, 1994 EDMONDS MASTER PLAN 105 NEW EDMONDS • WOODWAY 5CH®L HIGH SCH00L o�sreicr _• MASTER PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........ ............................. ................................. 1 THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN........................................................2 SITEDESCRIPTION ...................... _.._.......... ................. ............. ......... 3 MASTER PLANNING GOALS............................................................4 SITE DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES............................................5 Building Placement ................... .....6 • Open Space ._..._....__ .....7 • Edges / Boundaries ................... SITE CIRCULATION GUIDELINES...............................................9 • Vehicular Circulation ..................... ... 10 • Pedestrian Circulation ............ .................... • Parking Facilities............................................................................. 12 FACILITY DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES .............................. 13 • Building Massing ............. • Architectural Scale........................................................................... 15 • Building Height ------- •....................................................................16 • Building Setbacks............................................................. ......... 17 ADDITIONAL PLANNING ISSUES ............................................. 18 CONCLUSION..-- - ...................•......................................................... 19 EXHIBITA............................................................................................... 20 EDMONDS - WOODWAY HIGH SCHOOL Packet Pg. 201 The recent passage of the Edmonds School District capital improve- ment bond and the creation of the new Edmonds-Woodway High School symbolize the community's commitment to the place of edu- cation within our society. The opportunity to include a master plan for the school as a component of the proposed City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan will bring additional benefit to the citizens of our community. While the master plan is broad and conceptual in its scope, it will provide an effective framework for accomplishing the planning, design and construction processes that are required as we collectively realize our community's educational vision. The role of education in our society is continually changing. Schools are increasingly regarded as learning centers for the whole community - students, families, seniors, business and industry. Shared resources present opportunities to forge partnerships that encourage citizenship, internships, mentoring and community service. The construction of the new Edmonds-Woodway High School will provide opportunities that extend far beyond the traditional school population. The Edmonds School District is exploring this community partner- ship in ongoing discussions with Stevens Memorial Hospital. Current educational programs related to health care may be relocated to the new Edmonds-Woodway High School when the school opens to take full advantage of its proximity to the hospital. The hospital is inter- ested in using the new school's classrooms for staff training and meetings. Use of parking areas for after school hours events is also INTRODUCTION under consideration. Both the School District and Stevens Memorial Hospital are eager to explore and develop the resources of this City - designated "Activity Center" in a manner that will benefit the community as a whole. The site for the new Edmonds-Woodway High School has an his- toric relationship both to the education of our community's students and to the activities which bring the larger community together. Edmonds High School occupied the site from 1957 until the facili- ties were closed and the student body merged with Woodway High School in 1989. The Edmonds School District Stadium remains the focus of spirited high school athletic competition and the athletic fields provide for school and community recreational programs. This site is an important one and the proposed development will continue the partnership between the School District and the community. Inclusion of the new Edmonds-Woodway High School in the proposed Edmonds Comprehensive Plan will provide our community with clear value in three distinct ways. The community will participate in an expanded educational vision. The City of Edmonds will chart a course for other municipalities that are forging a creative and responsive partnership between public agencies. Finally, through early and ongoing communication with the City, the Edmonds School District will seek to maximize the potential of the built environment within a fixed capital budget. MASTER PLAN -1- EDMONDS - WOODWAY HIGH SCHOOL Packet Pg. 202 Edmonds Comprehensive Plan MASTER PLAN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The proposed Edmonds Comprehensive Plan encourages the Port of Edmonds, Stevens Memorial Hospital and the Edmonds School District to adopt master plans which will become elements within the citywide plan. The plan which follows is aresponse to the opportunity to plan jointly for the benefit of the whole community and reduce or eliminate the need for special conditional approvals, permits and variances. The new Edmonds-Woodway High School Master Plan reflects the specific requirement of the Edmonds School District for a new state- of-the-art high school. The school, located on the original Edmonds High School site (Exhibit A, Legal Description), will accommodate the needs of 1600 students and provide resources for the surrounding community. In addition to the normal classroom, administrative and support spaces, the new facilitywill include a performing arts complex, and a sports center with gymnasium that will accommodate a variety of sports and recreational activities. The Edmonds School District Stadium, which seats 2,704 spectators, includes both an astroturf footbaWsoccer field and an all-weather track. Each of these facilities provides an opportunity, to share the resources of the new school with the Edmonds community. -2- EDMONDS - WOODWAY HIGH SCHOOL Packet Pg. 203 7.1.g Edmonds Comprehensive Plan Medical/Hwy 99 Activity Center Concept Map i i Act" Career ....... Met! Use Commerdal lhborhood Cmmw kW Conidor Development - - War Plan Development ti Family - High Density - MI Family - Mod Density Single Family I� Public Parklopen Space Medical/Hwy 99 Activity Center SITE DESCRIPTION The site for the new Edmonds-Woodway High School has been designated by the proposed Edmonds ComFTehensive Plan as part of the Medical/Hwy 99 Activity Center. T1-_e site is surrounded by commercial and residential neighborhoods with the following orientation: North: 212th Street SW and residential neighborhoods East: 76th Avenue W, Stevens Memorial Hospital, commercial and residential neighborhoods South: 216th Street SW, commercial and residential neighborhoods West: Residential neighborhoods which front on 80th Avenue W and have backyards that are adjacent to the school's athletic fields Holmes Corner, located at the intersection of 212th Street SW and 76th Avenue W, is on the Northeast corner of the site and is a hub of commercial activity. The commercial development includes a retail strip, Dairy Queen, Burger King, and Grease Monkey, each with parking lots which front onto the street. MASTER PLAN -3- EDMONDS - WOODWAY HIGH SCHOOL Packet Pg. 204 7.1.g In drafting this Master Plan for the new Edmonds-Woodway High School, the Edmonds School District is seeking to: • Create a learning environment that meets the needs of students and community members in the 21st Century; • Provide for optimum land use within the school site; • Provide for growth, expansion and change within the boundaries of the existing school property; • Encourage community use of the facilities providing clear and inviting pedestrian access and circulation; • Incorporate school facilities into the larger community by establishing partnerships with the adjacent businesses and residential neighborhoods; • Extend and enhance the context and fabric of the surrounding community working within the City of Edmonds urban design guidelines; and • Coordinare and streamline the planning and review requirements for the design and construction of the new school. MASTER PLANNING GOALS The design guidelines for the new high school campus are based on these goals, and are described throughout the following pages in three categories. Site Development Guidelines, which address building placement, open space, and site edges and boundaries; Site Circulation Guidelines, which address vehicular and pedes- trian access and circulation, as well as parking, and; Facility Development Guidelines, which address building massing, scale, height and setbacks. MASTER PLAN -A- EDMONDS - WOODWAY HIGH SCHOOL Packet Pg. 205 7.1.g Land Use and Traffic MASTER PLAN SITE DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES Paramount to our planning effort is the recognition that the school is a pact of the urban context of the City of Edmonds. The bound- aries of the school will not be defined solely by the confines of the building and site. The educational resource will extend to the side- walk, streets and businesses beyond. Some of tae considerations that acknowledge this context include the following: Building Placement - Buildings will be placed on portions of the site adjacent to the inter- section of 212th Street SW and 76th Avenue W. Opportunities for sharing resources with Stevens Memorial Hospital will be fully explored before locations of buildings and parking are finalized. Open Space Fields and open spaces are anticipated to rcmdi❑ near the residential areas bordering the site. Edges / Boundaries Landscape treatment will provide opportunities for visual linkages and/or buffering from adjacent streets. -5- EDMONDS - WOODWAY HIGH SCHOOL Packet Pg. 206 BUILDING PLACEMENT Context Map A Sense of Prominence SITE DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES Design Issue: The Edmonds-Woodway High School is a significant element of the urban context of the City of Edmonds and the proposed Medical/ Hwy 99 Activity Center. Within the Edmonds Community there are buildings of character which are situated in a manner which diminishes their presence. There are also prominent sites occupied by undistinguished buildings. The opportunity exists with the new Edmonds-Woodway High School to provide a facility with presence and character that is truly an asset to the community. Design Strategy: 2 t0 r Q Buildings will be placed in a visually prominent location - on the m portions of the site adjacent to 212th Street SW and 76th Avenue W E t to reinforce the facility's presence in the community. co r Q MASTER PLAN -6- EDMONDS - WOODWAY HIGH SCHOOL Packet Pg. 207 ELEMENT: OPEN SPACE Context Map Playfields SITE DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES Design Issue: The City of Edmonds Community Development Code identifies open space as an essential element determining the character of our environment. Design Strategy: The facility will be designed to optimize the balance between building area and open space. Open space and playfields will serve as a buffers between the school and residential areas bordering the site. MASTER PLAN -7- EDMONDS - WOODWAY HIGH SCHOOL Packet Pg. 208 SITE DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES EDGES / BOUNDARIES y Design Issue: LJJ A Street Trees - and/or Landscape-7 I M2 -� ------------ t f? Context Map Street Edge The proposed Medical/Hwy 99 Activity Center is a mixed use zone. Medical, commercial and residential uses are located adjacent to the site. The facility should be identifiable, easily accessible and pedestrian friendly. A high school facility requires a balance of accessibility and separation. Design Strategy: Provide street trees to enhance a sense of scale and afford protection from busy streets. Provide landscape treatment to establish connections and buffers along property boundaries. Retain and augment existing buffer zones around the site. MASTER PLAN -8- EDMONDS - WOODWAY HIGH SCHOOL Packet Pg. 209 Meuc seh M OM =ere* :a Site Circulation and Land Use MASTER PLAN SITE CIRCULATION GUIDELINES The Site Circulation Guidelines for the new Edmonds-Woodway High School address the impact of vehicular traffic and parking while en- couraging pedestrian access and community transit usage. Vehicular Traffic and Circulation Well designed traffic and circulation patterns enhance access, conve- nience and safety for all users and the community at large. Pedestrian Access and Circulation Pedestrian access to the new Edmonds-Woodway High School will be encouraged. Planner willenhance pedestrian access by providing attractive linkages to the fully developed streets, sidewalks, curbs and gutters adjacent to the school site Parking While the District is currently considering two separate parking lots to distribute traffic and parking on the site, a conclusion has not been finalized. Planning considerations will include: access, egress, safety and costs. -9- EDMONDS - WDODWAY HIGH SCHOOL Packet Pg. 210 7.1.g VEHICULAR CIRCULATION It %W Context 84 LO AflRric J I! J dMe�Yx�'.co�rcar } Ni7•G b._ 9¢ � l Y. _ � L 1. t uCs.� Circulation Diagram SITE CIRCULATION GUIDELINES Design Issue: The facility should be identifiable, easily accessible and pedestrian friendly. Well designed traffic and circulation patterns enhance access, conve- nience and safety for users and the community at large. The following circulation patterns will be considered: • Faculty, staff, student and visitor access; • Bus drop-off and pick-up points • Emergency vehicle access; and • Service access for deliveries and trash collection Design Strategy: Relocate bus access and service drive entrance away from the intersec- tion of 212th Street SW and 76th Avenue W to increase traffic safety. Identify potential impact of development and coordinate potential on -site bus pull-out for / with community transit and school buses. Provide off-street access to the building for service vehicles. MASTER PLAN -10- EDMONDS - WOODWAY HIGH SCHOOL Packet Pg. 211 PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION a Intersection 212th & 76th Entrance Plaza SITE CIRCULATION GUIDELINES Design Issue: Well designed traffic and circulation patterns enhance access, conve- nience and safety for users and the community at large. The facility should be identifiable, easily accessible and pedestrian friendly. Design Strategy: Clearly identify site egress and ingress locations. Clearly delineate building entry locations. Encourage pedestrian access (and discourage jay -walking) by design- ing an exterior plaza scaled to the neighborhood at the intersection of 212th Street SW & 76th Avenue W. providing links to the street and surrounding community. Encourage safe pedestrian access to Stevens Hospital. Provide exterior lighting as an amenity to pedestrians. Produce linkage with the community transit system. Produce secure, comfortable and convenient internal access within and between school facilities. MASTER PLAN -1 1- EDMONDS - WOODWAY HIGH SCHOOL Packet Pg. 212 PARKING FACILITIES Parking Facility Location 4 { ArOLEr� MELDS Site Plan SITE CIRCULATION GUIDELINES Design Issue: The newly designated Medical/Hwy 99 Activity Use Zone is to be pedestrian oriented. Parking lots located between a building and its street frontage inhibit pedestrian access. Design Strategy: Provide a maximum of 500 parking spaces for staff, faculty, students and visitors; Promote the use of shared parking facilities for peak demand hours. Develop a parking management plan for the facility. Locate parking areas adjacent to, not in front of, the facility. MASTER PLAN -12- EDMONDS - WOODWAY HIGH SCHOOL Packet Pg. 213 --- Existing Site Landuse MASTER PLAN -13- FACILITY DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES The facility development guidelines for the new Edmonds-Woodway High School have been developed to address issues of the facility's physical form, size and character. Building Massing and Scale The new Edmonds-Woodway High School will be located in the Northeast corner of the site in the approximate location of the original Edmonds High School. Significant elements of the existing site will be retained (the stadium, certain sports fields and parking). The massing of the approximately250,000 SF school will respond to these significant elements on the site and remain in proportion to the campus as a whole. The District Stadium has been excluded from the design guidelines because no improvements to the stadium will be made. Building Heights and Setbacks Building heights and setbacks will respond to the existing stadium, the surrounding neighborhoods and the Edmonds Comprehensive Plan. While the Edmonds School District S adium has been excluded from the guidelines which will govern the maximum height of new facilities, the 29,262 SF stadium structure, with lighting standards that reach beyond its 85 foot height, will continue to be a significant element for this site. EDMONDS - WOODWAY HIGH SCHOOL Packet Pg. 214 BUILDING MASSING Massing Conceptual Organization FACILITY DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES Design Issue: Community facility buildings may have a significant impact on the visual character of a community. Building massing, scale, modulation and articulation are design con- cepts which address the potential impact of buildings on the neighborhood. The new Edmonds - Woodway High School can enhance the desired visual character of the community. Design Strategy: The facility should form a campus composed of a number of discrete elements organized into a unified whole. Building area will be governed by the following limits: • Gross building area of the proposed high school facility will not exceed 300,000 SF; • Gross building area of proposed high school and future buildings will not exceed 450,000 SF; and • Footprint for the proposed high school and future buildings will not exceed 350,000 SE MASTER PLAN -14- EDMONDS - WOODWAY HIGH SCHOOL Packet Pg. 215 ARCHITECTURAL SCALE swim Community Facility Architectural Scale MASTER PLAN FACILITY DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES Design Issue: Edmonds - Woodway High School is a part of the urban context of the City of Edmonds and the proposed Medical/Hwy 99 Activity Center. Community facilities influence the scale and character of development in the region. Design Strategy: Architectural forms, landscape, textures, materials and colors will be used to contribute to the sensitive articulation of scale. Buildings, landscaping and site improvements will be developed with a scale appropriate to the urban context of which the school is a part. -15- EDMONDS - WOODWAY HIGH SCHOOL Packet Pg. 216 7.1.g BUILDING HEIGHT Relative Building Heights FACILITY DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES Design Issue: Building heights within the proposed Medical/Hwy 99 Activity Center, vary from single story residential buildings to the seven story medical facility at Stevens Hospital. Building height, scale and modulation all contribute to a sense of fit between a building and its surrounding community. Design Strategy: While building heights will vary to suit the program for a given func- tional element, and a landmark component of the facility may be desired. No building elements are anticipated to rival the heights of the existing Edmonds Stadium or Stevens Hospital. Building heights will be governed by the following limits: The maximum building height will not exceed 75 feet, measured from the grade at the building edges. • The maximum height will not occur over more than 15% of the maximum allowable area of the building(s). RIMMR/o �-� •The remainder of the building(s) shall not exceed three stories or E%ISTINA STACIW F�Zf-OSEC BUILDING 76th AvtNUE A 45 feet. Site Section/Diagram MASTER PLAN •16- EDMONDS - WOODWAY HIGH SCHOOL Packet Pg. 217 BUILDING SETBACKS s`- 4 PEDESTRIAN ZONE Setback Diagram Pedestrian Zones FACILITY DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES Design Issue: The building's height and setback are interrelated. Buildings in the proposed activity center district should establish a relationship with the street and be pedestrian oriented. The building setback requirements for this use / zone are 10 feet along a public street and 15 feet adjacent to residentially zoned properties. Design Strategy: c To the extent that it is not disruptive to educational activities, build- a ings will be oriented toward the street.; y R The setback from the street will create a pedestrian -oriented zone in keeping with the intent of the City for the Medical/Hwy 99 Activity Center. Q r c The building setback will vary as required to provide adequate sepa- t ration for a given function from noise and traffic. Y Q MASTER PLAN -17- EDMONDS - WOODWAY HIGH SCHOOL Packet Pg. 218 MASTER PLAN ADDITIONAL PLANNING ISSUES Community Activity The Edmonds School District's primary commitment is to the educational program of the new Edmonds-Woodway High School. However, the District actively promotes and encourages a partnership with the community. Therefore, every effort will be made to present the school as an amenity to the surrounding neighborhood and community. The school will provide opportunities for after-hours education, library and recreational uses. Performing arts/conference activities may provide additional resources for the community. The following considerations will be accommodated when possible: • Activities which are most often open to the general public or occur during evening hours will be located in close proximity to the park- ing lots and public sidewalks with adequate lighting; and • Major entrances shall be visible from public streets and transit stops. Potential Future Development w It is anticipated that space within the building site will be reserved for future growth and expansion. Potential development considerations a� currently being discussed include: • Potential space for portable classrooms; • Future expansion of permanent academic spaces; Q c m • Daycare facilities; and E t U • Swimming pool facility. Q -18- EDMONDS - WOODWAY HIGH SCHOOL Packet Pg. 219 MASTER PLAN M CONCLUSION Project Schedule The current schedule for the demolition of the existing Edmonds High School and the planning and design of the new Edmonds- Woodway High School is as follows: Spring 1994 ...................... Asbestos Abatement Early Summer 1994 .......... Relocation of Utilities Summer 1994 ................... Building Demolition Summer 1995 ................... Earthwork and Underground Utilities Winter/Spring 1996.......... General Building Construction Fall 1997-Winter 1998 ..... Completion and Opening of facility Conclusion The Edmonds School District is pleased to participate in the devel- opment of the Edmonds Comprehensive Plan. Inclusion of this site in the Comprehensive Plan clearly has benefits for both the City of Edmonds and the Edmonds School District. As we look to the future as educators and community planners, we recognize the challenge of appropriate and fiscally responsible allocation of resources. By devel- oping responsive and accountable systems for determining how we grow as a community, we validate the public's trust and provide for our community's future in a comprehensive manner. EDMONDS - WOODWAY HIGH SCHOOL Packet Pg. 220 EXHIBIT A Legal Description for new Edmonds•Woodway High School The east three quarters of the northeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 30, Township 27 North, Range 4 East, Willamette Meridian. Also the south half of the west half of the west half of said northeast quarter of the northeast quarter. Except the north 210.0 feet and the west 180.0 feet of said south half and except public streets. MASTER PLAN -20- EDMONDS - WOODWAY HIGH SCHOOL Packet Pg. 221 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES - RECEIVED MAY 14, 2018 Backstops Chain link Fence Backstop to 40' ht. Edmonds-Woodway High School Multi -Purpose Field Design Element Images Attachment 7 PLN20180014 Packet Pg. 222 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES - RECEIVED MAY 14, 2018 Batting Cage Structure and Net Batting Cage Batting Cage Building —Steel siding, CMU wainscoting with netted interior structure. Edmonds-Woodway High School Multi -Purpose Field Design Element Images Packet Pg. 223 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES - RECEIVED MAY 14, 2018 7.1.h Batting Tunnel, exterior to building. Edmonds-Woodway High School Multi -Purpose Field Design Element Images Packet Pg. 224 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES - RECEIVED MAY 14, 2018 7.1.h Bleachers 5 rows, non -elevated 27' long portable bleachers Edmonds-Woodway High School Multi -Purpose Field Design Element Images Q Packet Pg. 225 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES - RECEIVED MAY 14, 2018 7.1.h Edmonds-Woodway High School Multi -Purpose Field Design Element Images Packet Pg. 226 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES - RECEIVED MAY 14, 2018 Dugout Typical dugout with chain link perimeter fence and netting. Typical to have galvanized roof with color panels. Edmonds-Woodway High School Multi -Purpose Field Design Element Images Packet Pg. 227 h. do -74 �44.4.v oik kr . PEI -J DEVELOPMENT SERVICES - RECEIVED MAY 14, 2018 7.1.h Fencing Typical fencing will have black vinyl coated fabric, with all hardware and posts powder coated black. Netting will be black polypropylene. Edmonds-Woodway High School Multi -Purpose Field Design Element Images Packet Pg. 229 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES - RECEIVED MAY 14, 2018 Field Lighting Lighting will be with steel poles on concrete footings/foundations. Light fixtures to be LED, matching other fixtures on the Edmonds Woodway Campus stadium field. Edmonds-Woodway High School Multi -Purpose Field Design Element Images Q Packet Pg. 230 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES - RECEIVED MAY 14, 2018 Edmonds-Woodway High School Multi -Purpose Field Design Element Images Packet Pg. 231 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES - RECEIVED MAY 14, 2018 Edmonds-Woodway High School Multi -Purpose Field Design Element Images Packet Pg. 232 r��T1 :.'�.�... �.II •may / I r , t VISUAL SIMULATION KEY LAYOUT LEGEND 14 FIZ�C2: PHOTO SIMULATION LOOKING SOUTHEAST FROM NEAR THE PROPOSED JAVELIN SYNTHETIC TURF AND III LANDSCAPE RESTORATION s - i AREA PERMEABLE AGGREGATE ,J -1 pryDTO SIMLI ATION LOOKING NORTHEAST FROM NEAR THE INTERSECTION OF RUBBERIZED SURFACING CHNNLINK FENCE AND 216TH STREET & 79TH AVENUE AND ASPHALT PAVING CONCRETE CURB N A� y CHAINLINK FENCE - ..� . PHOTO SIMULATION LOOKING NORTHWEST FROM NEAR THE HIGH SCHOOL ASPHALT PAVING ,"`,///■ PARKING 101 ENTRANCE FOR 211TH STREET CONCRETE CURBING CONCRETE CURBING ,. PERVIOUS CONCRETE PAVING LIMIT OF SYNTHETIC TURF _ AND CONCRETE EDGE CONCRETE PAVING ANCHOR CATCH ITTCHBASIN INLET (C.B.L) TYPE x ACRYLIC SURFACING CATCH BASIN INLET (C.B.L) ® TYPE 2 Attachment 8 PLN20180014 APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDMONDS DAZE: BY: cm_ E:GINE=R I:G OI'ASICII REVISION I'.I )ku):NDS ts c 2 4 `H1— )L > I1 I v I N t t I = O EDMONDS V WOODWAY HIGH SCHOOL SYNTHETIC TURF CONVERSION 0 O En z DA HOGAN >s 3 O OEM Of=%1 E W to _ O }. NORTH E 0 30' 60 (n SCALE. 1"= 30' O DATE SJ-201A SCALE 1"=3B 00 DRAWN CPIV CHECKED N1 Ir Qa..a o a .war: z sswouE. _ E VISUAL SIMULATION r KEYPLAN Q SHEET RECEIVED MAY 14 2u'IJ DEVELOnMENT SERViC�-: COUNTER Packet Pg. 233 7.1.i EDMONDS WOODWAY HIGH SCHOOL VISUAL SIMULATION co Q r C d E t v 2 r a II ;'. H Packet Pg. 234 7.1.i EDMONDS WOODWAY HIGH SCHOOL VISUAL SIMULATION co Q r C d E t v R r-+ Q 1. 41-1CA H I Packet Pg. 235 7.1.i EDMONDS WOODWAY HIGH SCHOOL VISUAL SIMULATION 4=J co Q r C d E t v 2 r a )le H Packet Pg. 236 7.1.j Edmonds Woodway High School 7600 212th Street SW, Edmonds WA 98026 I d EDMONDS SCHOOL DISTRICT EDMONDS-WOODWAY HIGH SCHOOL SYNTHETIC TURF CONVERSION Owner Prime Consultant Edmonds School District 20420 68th Avenue W. Lynnwood, WA 98063 (425) 431-7000 Phone Consulting Engineers D.A. Hogan & Associates, Inc. 119 1 st Avenue S., Suite 110 Seattle, WA 98104 (206) 285-0400 Phone Civil Engineering Electrical Engineering LPD Engineering Stantec 1982 1st Avenue, Suite 201 4100 194th Street SW Suite 400 Seattle, WA 98101 Lynnwood, WA 98036 (206) 725-1211 Phone (206) 224-3689 Phone Drawing Index F-0.0 Cover & Index F-2.1 Typical Sections F-3.1 Composite Layout Plan & Details F-2.2 Drainage Details F-3.2 Baseball Layout Plan & Details F-0.1 Topographical Survey F-2.3 Drainage Details F-3.3 Baseball Details F-0.2 Topographical Survey Notes F-2.4 Detention Details F-3.4 Soccer Layout Plan & Details F-0.3 T.E.S.C. Plan F-2.5 Drainage & Irrigation Details F-3.5 Football Layout Plan & Details F-0.4 T.E.S.C. Details F-2.6 Irrigation & Washwater Details F-3.6 Alternate Bid Batting Cage F-0.5 T.E.S.C. Notes F-2.7 Irrigation & Washwater Details Structure F-0.6 Demolition Plan F-2.8 Irrigation & Washwater Details F-3.7 Alternate Bid Batting Cage F-2.9 Fencing Details Structure F-1.1 Layout Plan F-2.10 Fencing Details F-1.2 Grading Plan F-2.11 Netting & Fencing Detail E1.0 Electrical Site Plan -Demo F-1.3 Drainage Plan F-2.12 Site Details E1.1 Electrical Site Plan F-1.4 Irrigation Plan F-2.13 Site Details E2.1 Elep"al Details F-1.5 Fencing Plan F-2.14 Field Event Details APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION F-1.6 Landscape Planting Plan F-2.15 Field Event Details CITY OF EDMONDS F-1.7 Wall Elevation Plan F-2.16 Backstop Details DATE, F-2.17 Dugout Details BY: arcr .,on Attachment 9 PLN20180014 REVISION DATE rl lunntls SCf t[3Ftl. EDMONDS WOODWAY HIGH SCHOOL SYNTHETIC TURF CONVERSION i DA HOGAN fn C MAY 1dMIA Q r DEVELOPMEN riOUN DATE 54 MR SCALE Nis Q DMWN CM C CHECKED BSH �c I_ t v a-. a COVER & SHEET INDEX SHEET F-0.0 Packet Pg. 237 EDMONDS WOODWAY HIGH SCHOOL A PORTION OF THE NE 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 27 N., RANGE 4 E., W.M. CITY OF EDMONDS, SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON _ P r•� Y r r r g r Utz rr �'`'j�f`e Ay y •- : r ' I ' ,r....�I ,.. I �/• � r � .. �!-,,.� �, r •�"� / ��-i• �f� r+�yl J {{ r I r? . '. \ q r . ! •. J Ali e; F 1 I r �� I 1 I I 'f l � � r � � r : {•.:'.:'L � 1 ' : .. /r \ +' ; r.� ' .' Y Z7 1 r I I I r I r I f f I I kl I III `� ..�'� r ..' / $�eo~ �, �• / a Ro: Ir rllll I 1 i = ti'• ,:.'' ::.': / - /�i rI r f I I �r� Illi ff 1�r \r— — 7>1 jrj i' ( f � � ` I '� , If, I f�1 . — � \ \ _ — —+ � / / / / �r J �' 9f C.• I � r r• :nti I r I r , �� I � r �I I �f �f � f f y — � \ — \ \ \ / f I ` ''�� l_.L� _ .1 rr r 1 � � I I i,}II I�I' Irf - �r ,.\ r .' \ r' �;= —,.'— •% •, I `�� Jy; I AI r � f r f ' I - I . } I ��I IIII II `•;-�=• •'� \ \ r\ r \ �.' � r / / / / � �.�] \ 9 �� . � I . I I -• � � .� {• �I I1�1111 III I :.� � � �.�..N \ _ _ \ -� \ — ;- , it / � � r \ � I I I lrl I\ `• Lr .� ! /�_ .� fl�� ' � � �i� �' � �\ � � —' r— — � /r J l "" /r � �.� (� J r .•� �� •ter r r 'A• �� --- - Er r I _ �� I. ..�' \_ `-� .� �� ,• AIVROV£O FOR CONSTRU � ..� • L1�1 4 f+ � � � n.e � � � r.Ft•IME-r 11MR.o1• — -- � rail— DATE: sw� sou R LT. a 1. N v. —1,4 Ec b 210TH STREET SW ,•� � ,jar BY: ��,w CIrvENGINEERING OIVISIGN .o pR SURVEYOR'S NOTES: 1) THE MONUMENT CONTROL SHOWN FOR THIS SITE WAS ACCOMPLISHED BY FIELD TRAVERSE UTILIZING A ONE (1) SECOND THEODOLITE WITH INTEGRAL ELECTRONIC DISTANCE MEASURING METER (GEODIMETER '00, A REAL TIME KINEMATIC (RTK) / STATIC GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM (GPS1. LINEAR AND ANGULAR CLOSURE OF THE TRAVERSES MEET THE STANDARDS OF WAC 332-130-090, 2) UTILITIES OTHER THAN THOSE SHOWN MAY EXIST ON THIS SITE. ONLY THOSE WHICH ARE VISIBLE OR HAVING VISIBLE EVIDENCE OF THEIR INSTALLATION ARE SHOWN HEREON. 3) THIS SURVEY REPRESENTS PHYSICAL IMPROVEMENT CONDITIONS AS THEY EXISTED SEPIEMBER 29. 2015. THE GATE OF THIS FIELD SUMVEY- 4) THIS 1g HOT A MIf%pDAIW gURYFY 5) IT IS NOT THE INTENT OF THIS SURVEY TO SHOW EASEMENTS OR RESERVATIONS MHILH NAY EFFECT THIS SITE. 1 BASIS OF BEARING: WASHINGTON STATE LAMBERT GRID NORTH ZONE COORDINATES, PER GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM AS DETERMINED BY OBSERVATION. BENCHMARKS: BASM CITY OF LYNNWOOD BENCHMARK NO-79. NW ANCHOR BOLT OF SIGNAL POLE IN BE DUAORANT OF THE INTERSECTION OF 195TH STREET SOUTHWEST AND 76TH AVENUE WEST. ELEVATION: 407.05 FEET SITE NO.I: SET WAS NAIL IN ASPHALT, NORTHEAST CORNER SITE. /-0.6- WEST OF FACE OF CURB. 23.3 SOUTH OF BOLLARD, ELEVATION 415.13 FEET SITS NO.E: SET NAG NAIL IN SIDEWALK SEAN. SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SITE. +/-4,3• BE OF BE CORNER OF BATTING CAGES, 6.0' NORTHEAST OF CENTER OF CATCH BASIN ELEVATION 410. 15 FEET VERTICAL DATUM: NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988-NAVD BB pDroolzill A - IRRIGATION CONTROL BOX(ICB) 0 - HAND HDLE (IMM - GUY WIFE ANCHOR(GMA) -P- POWER PAINT -OP- - OVERHEAD POWER X - LIGHT STANDAID(LB) LILY - UNKNOWN LOCKED VAULT 0 SIGN 0 HOME RATE Yk - BOLLARD • FIR TREE. SIZE NOTED 0 MARE TREE, SIZE NOTED ♦ ORNAMENTAL TREE. SIZE NOTED V WATER FOUNTAIN • NET POST CEN F�I1V T E aARMM..+. AY4. MMAL suet +AIa aUeN mL Fros - aemnsr u 0♦>00 T1p}ry4-erlM aW 'GY}PTyT030 Nr 'D WOODS N LARSON OCT.WE 1. 2015 349f 1- - 20- 349] NE -NE 30, T27N., R4L, W.K T®11R O-A. H06AN G ASSOCIATES, INC 119 1ST AVENUE SOUTIL SUITE 110 SEATTLE. WA. 98104 SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON N N NOTE: 1 STAMPEDISIGNEDSURVEYONFIIE 2 NOT ALL UTIUTIESSHOWN ARE FIELD VERIFIED -0A HOGAN HAS MODIFIED THE SURVEY IN SOME INSTANCES TO INCLUDE AS -BUILT UTILITY I NFORMATION PROVIDED UYTHE OWNER REM VERIFY AT INITIALSITE PREPARATION WHERE NOTED REVISION DATE H WON ( IS Is scl3a�L EDMONDS WOODWAY HIGH SCHOOL SYNTHETIC TURF CONVERSION r L7A HOGAN r � s 1 tAP A0. ( NORTH o30'ld—SIG SCALE: 1"= 30' DATE 54-2018 SCAM 1-3P DRAWN JOM CHECKED FISH 0— --- TOPOGRAPHICAL TOPOGRAPHICAL SURVEY SHEET F-0.1 a Packet Pg. 238 7.1.j EDMONDS WOODWAY HIGH SCHOOL A PORTION OF THE NE 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 27 N., RANGE 4 E., W.M. CITY OF EDMONDS, SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON DESCRIPTION: Parcel A: The North 1/3 of the North 2/3 of the East 3/4 of the Northeast quarter Of the Northeast guar ter of Section 30, Townahip 27 North, Range 4 East X.M., in Snonomlah County, Washington, pore particularly tleacr iDea es f of lows: Beginning at the Northeast Corner a1 said Section 30; than West 997.E feet: thence South 295.0 feet: thence East 997.E feet; thence North 294.4 feet to the true point of beginning; Except the EaSt 30 feet [hereof canveyetl to Snohomish County by aaetl recor Sea untler Autlitor'9 Fi]e IN 189533; And Except the North 40.0 feet thereof conveyyed to the City of Etlmontls by deed recorded under AUOitar'9 File No. BB02090125. Parse] Er. beginningp at the Northeast turner 01 Section 30. Township 27 North, t"Inc 4 EaPt M-M.. n Snennmlen County, kaan 3fig[oa; enentr $Ouch 294.4 feet to the [roe W1Dt OF EEeppinning; trance Vast 997.a feet, mare or lees to Cno War` line of the EASE 3/4 at the fbrtnRaeL Qu4rtar Of the Nortreeet Ouerter of a53d SOCIfun 30. Ln vn[e :suer 5D0 feet; tnonte East 998.1 foot. Rmre or less to the East ]Lna Of the Northeast Quarter of th0 NOrtnvaet OuOn Of Saitl Section 30; to ence North bad -a foes Mrs ar }eso to the true Point of tmg1FNTTnq; Except TO EAL 30 faRt thereof conveyad to 5010 noft," County by Omrecorded under Auditor's File 10 1B9533. Pa r[ei C-- All that portion of the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of $ostler 3q. Tgwnenlp 27 1aPr tn, Range 4 Eeet W.M in Snohomish County, WAen1M1g[an, Oeaer [pad en fOlIONA: Beginningp at ■ point B53.2 flat $Oath of the Northeast quarter of Saitl se ctieh 30 the trya pp01nt Of pp inning; I'm Neae 9e6.1 fail mere Or I. to the N69t line of in East 3/4 OF ea Id NOr Lheas2 11c. ter Ol the NOrtaeeat q.:rter;thence South to the SOUth line of Salo INI11v1aA0n: then[! Eaat alongpeaia aidSouth Ilse tb the E. 9t line of f9 Said Subdivision: Except the Eaat 3S S!!t In@reOf East nCOnvepthe pao till ShanOmB9hi Count y by deed r4cprore under "attar F11e Na 169733 Percel D:West half of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of the Hart hee st Ouert er of Section 30, Township 27 North, Renee 4 East of the Wil lane tt! diitlien, recortl9 of Snon 1111 County, Ma shinBton; Except the North 210 feet thereof; and Except the West 1B0 feet thereof. All Situate in the County Of Snohomish. State of Washington TITLE REPORT SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS: Special exceptions contained within title report lssued by Chicago Title Insurance Company. Order Number 500032774C, doted September 24, 2015 1. Easement (a) for the purpose(:) Show] below and rights Incidental thereto, as granted In a document: Purpose: Road RecOrOing Date: December 4, 1957 Recortling NO .: 1262781 Affects: South 30 feat of Parcel 0 Platted: Yes, south aide of Parcel D 2. Easement (e) far the purpose (s) Shown below and rights incidental thereto, as granted Sn a tlocument: Granted to: City of Etlmontls Purpose: municipal utilities Recortling Date: February 26, 1964 Recording IN . 1678230 Affects: West f0 feet of the North 320 feet of Sold premises Plottetl: Yes, but. 1t fella north of the work area 3. Easement(sl for the purpose(s) show] below and rights incidental thereto, es granted in a document: Granted to: City of Edmonds Purpose: Sanitary sewer line Recortlln9 Date: December 7. 1964 RecortllnB Na .: f744341 Aflscts: East f0 }set of Parse] D Plet tetl: Yen, on went line of site 4. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto, as granted In a document: Granted to: City of Edmonds Purpose: storm sewer Recortling Date: November 23, 1956 Recording No.: 1924233 Affects: West 10 feet of Pence C and West 10 feet of portion of Plotted: Yen, rune north and South through the western portion Parcel B 9. Easement(s) for the purposes) shown below and rights incidental thereto, as granted 1n n document. Grantedto: City of Edmonds Purpose: Storm sewer and Saniteryy sewer lines Recording Date: Februery 13, 196B RecortllnB No.: 2013280 Affects: North 10 feet of Percel D Platted; Yes, the north line of the very western portion of the site G- Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto, as grantetl Sn a document: Grantetl to: Peter Salamonsen, an Individual and City of Edmonds Purpose: storm aewar Recording Date: Mayy 1. 1958 RicortllnB Me 2027844 Affects: West 10 feet of Parcel C and West 10 feet of a portion of Parce� B Plotted: Yes, runs north and south through the western portion 7 Matters dlsclo5ed on the face of survey recorded under Auditor's File No. 2369995, as follows: Fence Linea a9 tleplctetl on survey tlo not conform to property lines. Pass]ble right, of c]e ISS of per [lea 1n Dcanea5lon between the fence lines and boundary ]ones es tleplctetl on the]e[e of seftl survey. 6- Easement(51 for the purpose(:1 show below and rights incidental thereto, as Grantedin a tlocument: Granted to: Public Utility District No. 1 of Snohomish County Purpose: wire overhang RecortllnB Date: Aor1] 9, 1975 Recortling No.: 2380680 Affects: pore] on of Parcel A Pl.tied : Yes, very northeast corner 9. Easeft lti:l for the purpose(5) shown below and rlghta incitlental thereto, as Br anted In a "CUIEMt. Granted to: Public ULillty aisir lee Ho. f of Snohomish County Purpose. Electric trah:ml55LYR "Ll'or df strlbut l on 11ne Recording Date JanDar 31. 1077 Ryrgraing No 7701310130 Affects: Portion of "Id Preel:aa PLO ttoo; No. the OUCUe ImL does hot contain a specific location 10. Right to make necessary slopes for cuts or fills upon property herein described as granted or reserved in dead In favor of: CIty of Etlmontls Recortling Date: February 9. 19es Recortling Na .: BB02D90125 Plotted: No, the document does not contain a specific location 11. Ee:ement(s1 far the purpose(s) Shown below and rights Incidental thereto, as grantetl in a tlocuman t: Grantetl to: Public Ut11I ty District No. 1 of Snohomish County Purpose: Electric transmission antl/ar distribution line Recortling Dete: June 28, 1geS RecortllnB No.: BB062B0044 Affects: Pardon of Saitl premises Platted: IN the tlocument does not contain a specific location 12 Ea:ement(sl for the purpose(s) shown below and rights Incidental thereto. en Oren tad in a document: Granted to: GTE Northwe:t. Inc. Purpose: comnunicat f on sarvlceS Recording Date: May 23. 1991 RecortllnB Mo.: 9705230181 Affects: Easterly pprt.oh of Parcels B D C Plotted; Yes, in two location. on the east line 13. Ea:ement(sl for the purpose(s) shown below and rights Incidental thereto, es granted in a document: Granted to: Public Utility District No. 1 of Snohomish County Purpose: Electric transmise Ion and/or distribution IIne RecordingDate: Julyy 5 1994 Re co rain, No.. 9407060b94 Affects: Portion of Sol premises Plotted: Yes and No, the document does not contain a specific location for the melor lty of the 9aslmant. however. the portion an the east ]ins 1s platted 14. Eesement(61 for the purpose(s) Shown below and rights Incidental thereto, es granted in a tlocument: Granted to: City of Etlmontls Purpose: Ngternne Recortling Date: March 15, 7995 Recortling NO.: 9503150264 Affects: West 5 feet of Ee5t 75 feet of Said premises Plotted: Yes, near the east line TITLE REPORT SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS: (CONTINUED) 15. Easement(s)for the purposels) shown below and rights incldental thereto, as granted 1n a document' Granted to: Public Utiliity District No. 1 of Snohomsh County Purpose: Electric transm 196 Ion and/or distribution ine RecartlinB Date: December B. 1995 Recortl Lng No.: 9612050267 Affects: Portion of said premises P l a tled: No, the document does not Contain a specific location 15. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) Shown below and rights incidental thereto, as granted 1n a tlocument: Granted to: City of Etlmontls Purpose: ut111 ty an pedestrian lmpravement. Recording ORte: June 3. 1998 Recording Na.: 9806030206 Affects: South 10 Fa6C of East 10 }eat of Parcel C Platte o: Yes, 1n ins sou thee:[ corner 17. Matters dlscl osed an the face of Survey recorded under Auditor's File No. 200204OB5002, as follows: Fence Lines a9 depicted on Survey tlo net conform to property ]]nes. Pass Ibis rights of claims of parties 1n possession Detw6en the Fence lines and boundary lines as depicted on the}a ce of saltl Survey. IS. Interlocal Agreement between Eamona9 School District No. ]9 and City of Eamond S, Edmonds-Nooaway HighSc hool Atnletic Fis Id Dralhage Improvements and the terms and CondlLlon9 thereof: Recording Data: Oc caber 10, 2002 ReCOrain g No .: 200210100122 Plotted: Not survey related 19 Easement(s) for the purpose(:) anown below antl rights incidental thereto. as granted in a tlocument: Granted to: Public Utility District No. i of Snohomish County Frontier Com._l cations Northw9et, Inc. Purpose: Electric Distributlpn Llne Facilities Recording Date: December 1, 2070 Record g No.: 201 012010477 Affect a: North 4 feet of the South 301 feet of the East 8 feet of Parcel C Plotted: Ye , along east line 20. Enar oecnmrnt Agraemrnt rno Lne terms and provisions contained therein: Owner: Eomaffas 9cnbDl Olatrtct No. 15 Drahtar; City o1 Edmonds Race rd ing DI Januaryy 27 2015 Recor'aing No 2D1501270$0 Nate: Tn1s agreement war not executed by the City df Etlmontls. P ]Ditto: M0, ibis 1e a rater ease vent for en existing waterline See [nF anueent for approx location 21. The property herein aescribetl 15 carried on the tax rolls as exempt. However, it wi 11 become taxable an the data of the execution of a conveyance to a taxable antl ty antl subject to the lien of real property taxes for the balance ofthe yyear Irom that date: Tex Account No.: 270430-001-048-00 Levy Code: DO217 Assess ad value -Lana: SB, 733,200. OD AS",setl Value -Improvements: $15.261,000.00 Plotted: NOt Survey related APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDMONDS DATE - BY: CRYENWENNGOMSpn cjry P�INTT lYlel�r►Rt RA 142M ]'Alt $xrri FixL />L' - Sksett lA BB'.i6 a60-sfs-tell mmo life-a1F11� ha '0 WOWS N LARSON OCT. 1, 2015 3491 I- • 20 3491 NE -NE 30, T27N., W., W.M. t�el at O.A HOGAN s ASSOCIATES, INC 119 LET AVENUE SOUTH, SUITE 1f SEATTLE. NA. 98104 SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON NOTE: 1. STAMPED/ SIGNED SURVEY ON FILE 2. NOT ALL UTILITIES SHOWN ARE FIELD VERIFIED -DA HOGAN HAS MODIFIED THE SURVEY IN SOME INSTANCES TO INCLUDE AS -BUILT UTILITY INFORMATION PROVI IN THE OWNER FIELD VERIFT At INn IAL SIM MEPAAATION WHERE M71 10 REVISION DATE EDMONDS Is SCH®L D I1 IAIII EDMONDS WOODWAY HIGH SCHOOL SYNTHETIC TURF CONVERSION DA HOGAN N OE(R(t1 S It(yy{T� T e �V V�3 wrP Y � A 6 y A fxn.vfl 4" 1i pAFE 5-4-2019 SCALE HIS DRAWN iLH CHECKED R74 i xr Q:o TOPOGRAPHICAL SURVEY NOTES SHEET F-0.2 Packet Pg. 239 JAW f � f • I _ . � : ��'� � , f � �� r+' �, . �,�^..�.�, r'iS'�.'.L'Y � f .:w . :,�1 w�� q Y7/ ' Y 4r - `_ •_ � .t iitG'�i�J'.r {{�. Qom =� .' _ _ � . '`«T`i'�Tjl - ' { � � � _ �. ... � �. xr"fur. � � 'i-�•J Ic _'�_ ._aT.,. �' r, �� r � , -• { � y.PR07E f'-OA Aa- ll ' Y' - : i i I i .tee ,..1 �: '�p I . I I 1 - �yy I • + + RWFOR TO PROVIDE 03 21.000 �,K r :'G'� _ � � L� GALLON ®NREIR STEEE TANK AKD (I r y T I {.000 GN10M 9AKiR POLT TN'1C OlE TANKS v soREs rR„ FORS "wK �G 1��` `�ft.�• 1"5• A • ,•1 .-.. �'"`�!. LIMIT OF"VAWy�f'� �` ✓ •II AlEMP0A-& FILTER ! ! FENCE MP.) r - - T' �,_• : , -• - , .� fLj�I+r'f•'I Y -- t.S ��izS !.. ` - s .�e aY ,, . (� -,r +IJ/ o r f-1� �` �i i'� r �• fl �:�f. L� �� l,J =u1�� f .>�` i F �0.4 PR I ` .� , � 4 r.� �• _ ."7r I! � � V..; � ; #' 71 � 1 �� f {' �^'l . I I = I.�- ! I . :•� i f ` � - .,_ �__ , F� ��%• {- "l ~�� l �`yt • ~�JRl�� - •� j i ��"'111 , I ` : �, I :1 1 1 :S I I I ti I > 1 _ r — I 1 �,, ► �. ~ - Y. 1 �4JE Oft E Or &E NYSE FOR WATCH T OF Srf ALL ST0AAMPE54 Mr,EiF FUR ET MWATER P PFA DON5tFUCTICW STIXiMWAlEW PERMIT �`� ,��I r ! I - I } ^� _>�.1 i!' � _ — � f � • � .1 �•;: SUMP +ro PLLIlp � Tp E>Rrnna s,nRM sTsTE1T -S- F4` ' fit: �) QLTW }I J �y RON 1• I - I' I '1' rtJ� ['*-'�iTi... rr`iL: ;x• .1 F-C.4 ;� . J`` �.. • b ��, . ,� �. ,� l�JJ�JIJrI I �• I � _ r I '''I:II f °I��i",f�'�ry, r. .. ' I , f' .•I �` '2 TEMPORARY FORCE NH � C'"pOTWp� LAID ON GROUND �Rr+SCE-� . �' J lJj�71 I! it .=' i 1` I .f' 3�• I I I — :�. _y' •F' . / REMOVE MQ77 KDT In 1,5�.' ONONN' 1 , 1' UMR OF WORK ' �� .J1� rt1f1�. r c I 1 _ •I rll j + cmrPa F 04 \ '• + �; i' / r °.I - r � � ! f! � • •� � I • I _. • - • .1 I f 1 f I � I ��"` �' �' _ ^ • � - � r _ TE7+PQRAErr of I J — \ .r �' sEnRlcNr SUMP 4 gyp,)Lit 11 �� f rjlt� 1 1 1 r~st � ; I f � •�' if j� f 1 \` \ J f �F �lJ,� t t�J+f f I � U� . •I � I . i . i � � ~ ��II 1�;1 - ��,: � �� .. �� 11j1r�.r I it �' ,� I I ! " , l I � + jt � �5� aJ 4=' •'� �� - } _. ''' �� i" � I I 1 I �' �I ' �fi1�11� �kli ° r' \ � a ,- /• / / � �i�� \ , ' .J • �� "� f'.�r I �� ' f •11� I tl J \ 6 ROCK CHECK NINS D TEMPOR i FL10 ` + �.1'! r I .$ r �J� l 1 p1,`I';' - •• 1 wf �i. S I. F-O.a (,yp.) F-A4 FENCE ,JT �� J LIMIT OF WDRKJ ZN TESC EEGEIV.D k.., TESC DETAILS AND NOTES SEE SHEET F-0.4 AND F-0A z1 FILTER FENCE r-a a 9 • ---F . TEMPORARY INTERCEPTOR SWALE e F-0.4 e ROCK CHECK DAM 9 CATCH BASIN PROTECTION e F-D.4 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE e F-0.4 LIMIT OF WORK INSTALL CATCH BASINU PROTECTION AT ALL FORCE MAINS00' N SITE "THIN OF PRWECT LIMBS TEMPORARY SEDIMENT 4 ® SUMP AND PUMP F-D.4 APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDMONDS 4 BAKER TANK 4 DATE: Hr, Kno—hays below, Call before you dig. AL.rtSRIN DAIf EDMONDS Is SCH®L I I T EDMONDS WOODWAY HIGH SCHOOL SYNTHETIC TURF CONVERSION -(--I DA HOGAN AP A NORTH O�O SCALE: 1" = 30' WE s-a-lore SCALE 11--W DRAWN ICH CHEERED RSH TESC PLAN SHEET F-0.3 a Packet Pg. 240 ADAPTER SNORT AP 12' PERFORATED PIPE TOP OF DRUM SHALL BE B' MIN ABOVE GRADE PACMDE SOLID COWER MATCH EASTHNC RUROPF WIIFI SEDNNENT r(TO 01 Y GEOTEXTILE 3 FABOR BFWRVJEO 700%)CAS PEN( FLOWS) I I •ppp EOIIAL b [ PgOMOE 12' MIN CLEAN GRAVEL AROUND PERIMETER OF DRUM MAP WITH FLTFTI rABRIc UNULAITOR (yOR yr 51s1R.A'y'j •. SS GALLON DRUM W/ IVA yCr.r IIOF.C; Ox PROVIDE 'SMEAMOWD SEDIMENT CATCH BASIN INSERT' OR WINE TIES APPROVED EQUAL T MANUFACTURER'S NAME: BOWFIEIID ENVIRONMENTAL R SAFETY p PO Box 375ATION: PRESION. WA 9H1050 T INFORMADDRESS; TELEPHONE: FOR INFLRAM110N: (BW) BW-3B77 TELEPHWWW.SONE' -. .:. )�� -•� . TEMPORARY CATCH BASIN PROTECTION NOT TO SCALE INSTALL DRI'—..... _....—._ THERE IS PRESENT. AS 4'-8' QUARRY SPALLS J . GEOTE)rnLE FABRIC) 12' MIN. THICKNESS STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE NOT TO SCALE JOINTS IN FILTER FABRIC 91ALL BE SPLICED AT POSTS, USE STAPLES, WIRE NNGS, GT LOUNN-Da TO ATTACH FABRIC TO POSTS. 2'x2' BY 14 GA WIN EGUIVALINF, W STIVD STRENGTH FABRIC. USE FILTER FAR I I r 11 Ii � .—I�— ..._ .T — _i tMIX1MV11 4'ai� 6 NA%. (POST SPACING IMY 11'ElNL1N UBE INCREASED TO B' IF WIRE BACKING IS USED) BACKFlLL TRENCH WT H NATIVE SOIL OR 3M'-11X WASHED GRAVEL NOTE: FILTER FABRIC FENCES 4' WC00 POSTS, STET SHALL BE INSTA.LEG ALONG FENCE POSTS, RtEBER. 0 CONTOUR WHENEVER POSSIBLE SOUNA ENT NOTE- 0.02 I'MITTISTY AND NATIVE BAOKFILL REWIRED. l TEMPORARY FILTER FABRIC FENCE NOT TO SCALE —PAQWX FULL WDTH OF INGAM/ECRESS AREA WIDTH PER PLAN (PROVIOE FULL WIDTH OF INGRESS/ EGRESS AREA) WATER SEDIMENT SUMP PUMP DETAIL ' PUMP AND MOTOR BLOCKS JNOT TO SCALE WATER SURFACE NOT TO DRCEED ORIGINAL GROUND ELEVATION. SEED OR SOO. UNDISTURBED OR PROTECTED SLOPE. SLOPE NOT 10 EXCEM 16R COMPACT SEPIA TV SM OF THE MODIFIED PROCTOR MApµUM [N[Y OENSIri [ASTM D1S77]• O _ Milk FNEE�uwo IOA O ORIGINAL GROUND SURFACE 2 R. MNNIIWM WORN LEVEL BOTTOM IN. TO 4 IN. ROCK CENTER UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. UNLESS NOTES: 1. DIMENSIONS: 1 R. MINIMUM DEPTH (D) BY 2 R. MINIMUM BOTTOM WDTH, 2- SWALE GRADES SHOULD NOT EXCEED 7L SIRE S1.01'ES. SHLVJLD BE 21 OR LESS 3. OUTLET SHALL CONSIST OF RIPRAP DISCHARGING TO STABILIZED OUTLET, SEDIMENT POND OR LEVEL SPREADER. 5 INTERCEPTOR SWALE F-0.4 NOT TO SCALE ROCK MUSE COMFL£TELT �rER THE BOROM ES AND SOOF THE TIITC71 4' N al 17R095 SED110N SLOPES A z._ 4. -.➢ --' - ] - ROCK L - THE DISTANCE SUCH THAT POINTS A a B ARE OF • y _ _ '��.ill - EQUAL ELEVATION ' � GFY GLf, E pyl_•¢�yNG 1. ANY SEDIMENT DEPOSITION OF MORE THAN 0 S FEET SHALL BE REMOVED SO THAT THE CHANNEL IS RESTORED TO ITS DESIGN CAPACITY. 2. IF THE CHANNEL CAPACITY IS INSUFFICIENT FOR THE DESIGN STORM, IT MUST BE DETERMINED WHETHER THE N46LEN IS LOCAL (E.G., A CONSTRICTION OR BEND) OR THE CHANNEL IS UNDEROVAGNEO. IF THE PROBLEM 15 UNDER DESIGN, THE DESIGN ENGINEER SHALL BE NOHFIED ,END THE CHANNEL RMESN7Nm TO A MORE CONSFRVATNE STANDARD TO BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. 3. THE CHANNEL SHALL BE DAMINEO FOR SIGNS OF SCOURING AND EROSION OF THE BED AND BANKS. IF SCOURING OR EROSION HAS OCCURRED, AFFECTED AREAS SHALL BE PROTECTED BY RIP -RIP OR AN EROSION ROCK CHECK DAM NOT TO SCALE APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDMONDS I:nTe BY: xEVdK- SATE EIDMONDS ts SCH®L EDMONDS WOODWAY HIGH SCHOOL SYNTHETIC TURF CONVERSION J DA TGAN 40�iV P 1 1 405 hp2 A DATE 54-2019 SCALE ITS DRAWN IcH/CPw CHECKED w ��ie.amn= T.E.S.C. DETAILS SHEET F-0.4 Q Packet Pg. 241 7.1.j EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL (ESC) NOTES: 1. CONSTRUCTM AMSS ROUTE: CONSTRUCTION VEHICLE KM5 SMALL LIE, WHENEVER PRACTICAL, LIMITED TO ONE ROUTE. ACCESS POINTS SWILL BE STASIVIE0 WITH OUATRY SPALLS OR CRUSHED ROCK TO MINIMIZE THE TRACKING OF SEDIMENT ONTO PUBLIC ROADS. IF SEDIMENT IS TRANSPORTED ONTO A ROAD SURFACE, THE ROADS SHALL BE CLEANED THOROUC14T AT THE END OF EACH DAY. SEDIMENT SHALL RT REMOVED FROM ROADS BY SHOVELING OR SWEUP:NG AND BE TRANSPORTED TO A CONTROLLED SEDIMENT DISPOSAL AREA WITHIN 24 HOURS. STREET WASHING SHALL BE ALLOWED ONLY AFTER SEDIMENT IS REMOVED IN THIS MANNER. 2. STABILIZATION OF EXPOSED AREAS: ALL SOILS EXPOSED BY LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES SHALL BE STEED BY SUITABLE APPLICATION OF BAPS, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITEO TO. SOD. HrYDIi05EEDNG, OR OTHER VEQETATADN, PLASTIC COVERwG. ON MULCHING, NO SOELS SILALL REMAIN r.XPO5E0 FOR MORE IMAM YWO DAVIS FROM MOSER I THROUGH ARIL 30 AND NO MORE THAN SEVEN DAYS FROM MAY 1 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 30 3 PROTECTION OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES: ADJACENT PROPERTIES SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM SEDIMENT DEPOSITION BY APPROPRIATE USE OF VEGETATIVE BUFFER STRIPS, SEDIMENT BARRIERS OR FILTERS, OWES OR MULCHING, OR BY A COMBINATION OF THESE MEASURES AND OTHER APPROPRIATE BMPS. 4 MAINTENANCE: ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL SHIPS SHALL BE REGULARLY INSPECTED AND MAINTAINED BY THE OWNER TO ENSURE CONTINUED PERFORMANCE OF THEIR INTENDED FUNCTION. 5 AS REGUIRED BY THE CITY, OTHER APPROPRIATE SMPS TO MITIGATE THE EFFECTS OF INCREASED RUNOFF SHALL BE APPLIED. 6. UNDERGROUND UTILITY CONSTRUCTION. THE CONSTRUCTION OF UNDERGROUND UTUTY LINES SHALL SPECIFICALLY ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING: A EROSION CONTROL FOR EXCAVATED AND STOCKPILED MATERIALS; B. THE PLACEMENT OF EXCAVATED MATERIAL WHERE CONSISTENT WITH SAFETY AND SPACE CONSIDERATIONS SHALL BE PLACED ON THE UPHILL SIDE OF TRENCHES C. TRENCH DEWATERING SYSTEMS (MUST DISCHARGE INTO SEDIMENT TRAPS, SEOLEM PONDS, CA OFMER ACCEPIADLE MEAN5); D TRACKING AND SPILLING OF MATERIALS ON STREETS DUE TO HAULING; E DAILY CLEANUP AND STREET MANTENINCE. 7. ADDTIONAL ESC MINIMUM HEMA[REMENI5 FOR LARGER DMLOPAENTj: ALL NEW DEVELOPMENT AND REDEVELOPMENT THAT INCLUDES AMID OISILIRBVMG ACTMNES OF GREATER THAN. OR EGAAL TO. ONE ACRE N ADDITION TO MEETING THE MINIMUM PEOULRdEN15 SET FORTH ABOVE SMWL COURLY WITH ESC REQUIREMENTS LISTED BELOW. B DEUNEATE CLEARING AND EASEMENT LIMITS, N THE FIELD, MARK CLEARING LIMITS AND/OR ANY EASEMENTS, SETBACKS, SENSITIVE/CRITICAL AREAS AND THE BUFFERS. TREES AND DRAINAGE COURSES 9- SEDIMENT TRAPPING: PRIOR TO LEAVING THE SITE, SIORM WATF R RUNOFF SHARE PASS THROUGH A SEDIMENT POND OR SEIXAENT TRAP. OR OTHER APPFIOPRNTE BMPS. SEDIMENT PONDS AND TARP• PERIMETER DIKES. SEDFAENT BURNERS. AND OTHER BAPS INTENDED TO TPAP SEDIMENT ON -SITE SHALL DE CONSTRUCTED AS A FIRST STEP IN GRADING. THESE BLIMPS SHALL BE FUHGTIU+AL BEFORE LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES TAKE PLACE. EARTHEN STRUCTURES, SUCH AS DAMS, DIKES, AND DIVERSIONS SHALL BE SEEDED AND MULCHED ACCORDING TO AN APPROVED TIMETABLE. 10 CUT AND FILL SLOPES: CUT AND FILL SLOPES SILL BE DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTED IN A MANNER THAT WILL MINIMIZE EROSION IN ADDITION, SLOPES SHALL BE STABILIZED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ESC NOTE NO 2. 11- CONTROLLING OFF -SEE EROSION: PROPERTIES AND WATER WAYS DOWNSTREAM FROM DEVELOPMENT SITES SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM EROSION DUE TO INCREASES IN THE VOLUME, VELOCITY, AND PEAK FLOW RATE OF STCIRM WATER RUNOFF FROM THE PROJECT SARE- 12- STAITAOATHDN OF TEMPORARY CONVEYANCE CHANNELS AND OUTLETS: ALL TEMPORARY ON -SITE CONVEYANCE CHARNELS SMALL BE DEWNEO, CONSTRUCTED AND SIABUZZO TO PREVIEW EROSION FROM THE EXPECTED VELOCITY OF FLOW FROM A TWO-YEAR. 24-HOUR FREQUENCY STORM FOR THE DEVELOPED CONDITION, STA13LIZATION ADEOUATE TO PREVENT EROSION OF OUTLETS, ADJACENT STREAM BANKS, SLOPES AND DOWNSTREAM REACHES SHALL BE PROVIDED AT THE OUTLETS OF ALL CONVEYANCE SYSTEMS. 13. STORM ORAN INLET PROTECTOR: ALL STORM OWN NI.M MADE OPERABLE DURNC' CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE PROTECIEO SO THAT STORM WATER RUNOFF SHALL NOT TINTER THE CONVEYANCE SYSTEM WITHOUT FIRST BONG FILTERED OR OTHERWISE TREATED TO REMOVE SEDIMENT. 14. REMOVAL OF TEMPORARY BAPS: ALL TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS SHALL BE REMOVED WITHIN 30 MAYS AFTER FINAL SITE STABIUZATION IS ACHIEVED OR AFTER THE TEMPORARY BMPS ARE NO LONGER NEEDED. TRAPPED SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED OR STABIUZED ON STE, DISTURBED SOIL AREAS RESULTING FROM REMOVAL SHALL BE PERMANENTLY STABILIZED. 15. DEWATERRNG CONSTRUCTION SITES: DEWATERING SYSTEMS BALL DISCHARGE INTO AN APPROVED SEDIMENT FILTRATION OR SETTLING FACILITY 16. CONTROL OF POLLUTANTS OTHER THAN SEDIMENT ON CONSTRUCTION ALL POLLUTANTS OTHER THAN SEDIMENT THAT OCCUR ON SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE HANDLED AND DISPOSED OF IN A MANNER THAT DOES HOT CAUSE CONTAMINATION OF STORM WATER. 17. FIrµq�P LIABILITY: PERFORMANCE BONDING. OR OTHER APPROPRIATE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS, SHALL BE F_QU-s Co FOR ALL PROJECTS TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH THE APPROVED EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN. [ORO. 3792. 2010). 1B. ALL STE WORK MUST COMPLY WITH CITY OF EDMONDS DEVELOPMENT CODE. 19. THE TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL SYSTEM SHALL BE INSTALLED AND INSPECTED BY THE ENGINEERING INSPECTOR PRIOR To ALL OTHER CONSTRUCTION 20. AS CONSTRUCTION PROGRESSES AND SEASONAL CONDITIONS DICTATE. THE EROSION CONTROL FACILITIES SHALL BE MAINTAINED AND/OR ALTERED AS REWIRED BY THE CITY TO ENSURE EFFECTIVE AND FUNCTIONAL EROSON/SEDINENTATKN CONTROL 21. TEMPORARY SILTATION PONDS AND ALL TEMPORARY SILTATION CONTROLS SHALL BE MANTAINED IN A SATISFAETORY CUNOiION UNTIL SUCH TIME RUT CLEANING AND / OR CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED, PERMANENT ORAAAGE rACHLIFES ARE OPERARDNA, AID THE POTENTIAL FOR EROSION HAS PASSED 22. ALL DISTURBED LAND AREAS SHALL BE STABILIZED AS REWIRED BY THE CRY OF EDMONDS AS NOTED ELSEWHERE IN THIS PLAN SET. 23. WHERE POSSBLE NATURAL VEGETATION WILL BE MAINTAINED FOR SILT CONTROL. 24. STOCKPILES ARE TO BE LOCATED IN SAFE AREAS AND ADEOUATELY PROTECTED BY TEMPORARY SEEDING AND MULCHING. HYDROSEED PREFERRED, 25. THE PUBLIC ROW SHALL BE KEPT CLEAN. TRACKING OF MUD AND/OR DEBRIS FROM THE SITE WILL RESULT IN WORK STOPPAGE. GENERAL NOTES 1. ALL MATERIALS AND WORK SHOWN ON THESE PLANS SHALL CONFORM TO THE CITY OF EDMONDS STANDARD PLANS AND DETAILS, THE FOLLOWING SPECIFICATIONS AND CODES. AND ALL OTHER APPLICABLE LOCAL MUNICIPAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL CODES, RULES AND REGULATIONS: - CURRENT INTERNAT10MAL BUILDING CODE (IBC) - 2010 WSDOT/APWA STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROAD, BRIDGE AND MUNICIPAL CONSTRUCTION - WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY STORMWATER MANAGEMENT MANUAL FOR THE PUGET SOUND BASIN (CURRENT EDITION) 2. STANDARD PUN AND TYPE NUMBERS INDICATED ON THESE DRAWINGS REFER TO CITY OF EDMONDS STANDARD DETAILS, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE 3 A COPY OF THESE APPROVED PLANS MUST BE ON THE JOBSITE WHENEVER CONSTRUCTION IS IN PROGRESS. 4. DEVIA71ONS FROM THESE PLANS MUST BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD AND THE LOCAL GOVERNING AUTHORITY. 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL RECORD ALL APPROVED DEVIATIONS FROM THESE PLANS ON A SET OF 'AS -BUILT' DRAWINGS AND SHALL SUMMARIZE ALL AS -BUILT CONDITIONS ON ONE SET OF REPRODUCIBLE DRAWINGS FOR SUBMITTAL TO THE OWNER PRIOR PROJECT COMPLETION AND ACCEPTANCE. A SET OF AS -BUILT DRAWINGS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY OF EDMONDS PRIOR TO FINAL APPROVAL OF THE BUILDING OCCUPANCY/FINAL PROJECT APPROVAL 6. ELEVATIONS SHOWN ARE IN FEET. SEE SURVEY FOR BENCHMARK INFORMATION. 7. THE LOCATKNS Or EXISTING UTLfrIES AND SITE FEATURES SHOWN AIMCHA (LAVE BEEN FURNISHED BY OTHERS BY FIELD SURVEY OR OBTAINED FROM AVALFBLE RECORDS AND SHOULD THEREFORE BE CONSIDERED APPROXIMATE ONLY AND NOT NF.CESSARFLY COMPLETE. IT IS THE SOLE RESPONSOLRY OF THE CONITYDTOR 10 INDEPENDENTLY VTRfY THE ACCURACY OF ALL UTLrTY LOCATIONS SHOWN ANTI TO FURTHER OSCOVEE AND PROTECT ANY OTHER UTILITIES NOT SHOWN ANON WHICH MAY BE AFFECTED BY THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THIS PLAN. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATION, DEPTH. SIZE. TYPE AND CONDITION OF EXISTING UTILITY LINES AT CONNECTION OR CROSSING POINTS BEFORE TRENCHING FOR NEW UTILITIES. ENGINEER ASSUMES HD RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE COMPLETENESS OR ACCURACY OF THE EXISTING UTILITIES AND SITE FEATURES PRESENTED ON THESE DRAWINGS. ENGINEER SMALL BE M071FIED IMMEDIATELY OF CONFLICTS THAT ARISE. S. CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE AND PROTECT ALL UTILITIES DURING CONSTRUCTION AND SHALL CONTACT THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES LOCATION SERVICE (1-600-424-5555) AT LEAST 46 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION 9. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL CONDITIONS AND DIMENSIONS AT THE PROJECT SITE BEFORE STARTING WORK AND SHALL NOTIFY OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE OF ANY DISCREPANCIES. 10. PIPE LENGTHS WHERE SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE AND MAY CHANCE DUE TO FIELD CONDITIONS. 11. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN A COPY OF THE GEOTECHNICAL FIEpORT (WHERE APPLICABLE) AND SMYL IHORDIACALY rANU4RITE HIMSELF WITH THE CONTENTS THDIfor. ALL SITE MORAL S1Wl BE PEFGORMED IN STRICT COMPLIANCE WITH THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THIS REPORT. 12. STRUCTURAL FILL MATERIAL AND PLACEMENT SHALL CONFORM TO THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE PROJECT GEOTECHINICAL REPORT. 13. IANNDLES. CATCH 8ASUS, UTUTES AND PAVEMENT SHALL WEAR ON MEONM DENSE TO VERT OENSE NATIVE SOIL OR COMPACTED. STRUCTURAL FILL IF SOL 6 psTLOWD, SOFT. LOOSE. DIET OR Fr ORGANIC MATERIAL IS PRESENT AF SUOGRADE ELEVATION, REMOVE AND REPLACE MIM COLIPACTEO STRUCTURAL FILL PER GEOTECHNICAL REPORT. 14. SEE SURVEY AND ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR DIMENSIONS AND LOCATIONS OF BUILDINGS, LANDSCAPED AREAS AND OTHER PROPOSED OR EXISTING SITE FEATURES. 15. SEE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR PERIMETER FOUNDATION DRAINS. FOUNDATION DRAINS SHALL BE INDEPENDENT OF OTHER SITE DRAIN LINES AND SHALL BE TIGHTUNED TO THE STORM DRAIN SYSTEM WHERE INDICATED ON THE PLANS. 15. ALL REQUIRED STORMWATER FACILITIES MV51 OE CCH5191ICTED AkD AN OPERATION. PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY PAVEMENT UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE EWONEEN 17. ALL ROOF DRAINS, PERIMETER FOUNDATION DRAINS, CATCH BASINS AND OTHER EXTERNAL DRAINS SMALL BE CONNECTED TO THE STORM DRAINAGE STEM, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 13. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN AND PAY FOR ALL PERMITS REQUIRED FOR INSTALLATION OF ALL SITE IMPROVEMENTS INDICATED ON THESE DRAWINGS. 19. AS A MMNIVUJIA REOERRENEM, ALL OFSTURBED AREAS ON AND OP SITE BALL BE RETURNED TO THE EDUMALENT O I11EIR PRECONSTRIK ION COMATOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPROPRIATE REQUIREMENTS ANO STANDAAM 20. ALL DISTURBED SOIL AREAS STALL BE SEEDED OR STABILIZED BY OTHER ACCEPTABLE METHODS FOR THE PREVENTION OF ON-STE EROSION AFTER THE COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION SEE EROSION CONTROL PLANS FOR SPECIFIC GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL REQUIREMENTS. 21. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP OFF -SITE STREETS CLEAR AT ALL TIMES BY SWEEPING. WASHING OF THESE STREETS WILL NOT BE ALLOWED WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL. 22. THIS PROJECT IS NOT A BALANCED EARTHWORK PROJECT. BOTH EXPORT AND IMPORT OF SOIL AND ROCK MATERIALS ARE REWIRED. 23. SLOPE OF FINISHED GRADE SHAD. BE CONSTANT BETWEEN FINISHED CONTOURS OR SPOT ELEVATIONS SHOWN 24. FINISHED GRADE SHALL SLOPE AWAY FROM BUILDING WAILS AT MINIMUM 5% SLOPE FOR A MINIMUM DISTANCE OF 10 FEET. 25. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR AND SHALL INSTALL AND MAINTAIN SHORING AND BRACING AS NECESSARY TO PROTECT WORKERS, EXISTING BUILDINGS, STREETS, WALKWAYS, UTILITIES AND OTHER EXISTING AND PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS AND EXCAVATIONS AGAINST LOSS OF GROUND OR CAVING EMBANKMENTS. CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR REMOVAL OF SHORING AND BRACING, AS REWIRED. 26. CONTRACTOR SMALL OBTAN APPROVAL FROM THE CITY AND FOLLOW CITY PROCEDURES FOR ALL WATER SERVICE IHITERRUPIIONS, HYDRANT THIKOIFS, STREET CLOSURES OR OTHER ACCESS RESIRICTIONNS COO RACTOR SMALL NOT RELOCATE OR ELIMINATE ANY "YDWflS WTTNQLAT RRSV OBTAIMf O WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM THE FIRE MARSHAL. 27. COORDINATE AND ARRANGE FOR ALL UTILITY CONNECTIONS, UTILITY RELOCATIONS AND/OR SERVICE INTERRRUPTRNS WITH THE AFFECTED OWNERS AMC, APPROPMATE UTILITY COMPANIES. CONNECTIONS TO EXrTrNG URLRIES SHALL BE MADE ONLY WITH ADVANCE WRITTEN APPROVAL OF THE ALKHORITFES GOVERNING SAID UTILITIES. 28. EXISTING UTILITY LINES IN SERVICE WHICH ARE DAMAGED DUE TO CONSTRUCTION WORK SMALL BE REPAIRED AT CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE AND INSPECTED AND ACCEPTED BY CITY OF EDMONDS AND OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO BACKFILLING. 29. NEW UTILITY LOCATAONS ARE GENERALLY QIDMH VI' DIMENSION, WHERE NO DIMENSIONS ARE INDICATED, LOCATIONS MAY BE SCALED FROM ORAm.MCS. FIELD ADJUSTMENTS SHALL BE APPROVED BY OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE AND CIFY- 50. WHERE NEW PPE CLEARS AN EXISTING OR NEW UTILITY BY 6' OR LESS, PUCE POLYEFHYLENE PLASTIC FOAM AS A CUSHION BETWEEN THE UTILITIES, 31. SEE ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS (WHERE APPLICABLE) FOR EXTERIOR ELECTRICAL WOAD. CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE 1. REVIEW TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES. 7- CALL TOR UI4IIV LOCATES 3. INSTAL TESC MEASURES AND MANY" DUST CONTROL WALE PREVENTING DISTURBANCE Or ANY AREAS OF VEGETATION OUTSIDE THE CONSTRUCTION ZONE. 4. HAVE EROSION CONTROL MEASURES INSPECTED BY CITY OF EDMONDS CRY ENMEERNG INSPECTOR ALL TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION AND EROSION CONTROL MEASURES MIST BE IN RACE AND INSPECTED PRIOR To ANY CONSTRUCTION OR SITE CLEARING. OROSON AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PRACTICES AID/OR DEVICES HULL BE MAINTAINED UAL PERMANENT VEGEFATON 6 ESTABLISHED. 5, wiNous'H eAh'Ti» 1. UCT 's R RoVEn CRAOE SITE AS 4E0.011D0 fO P4Tkl DRAMALE FZKTuESS- 7. CLEAR. ORA & ROUGH GRADE STE. RDV(GEIATE DISTURBED AREAS NOT SU&IECt TO ADDITIONAL SURFACE 01 TURWACE. IMMWAXASELY AFTER ROACH GRADING. (OTH R EXPOSED AREAS SAUU.L BE STABILIZED PER EROSION CONTROL NOTES BELOW) B. POTHOLE ALL UTILITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION OF TEMPORARY SHORNO WALLS. 9. INSTAL 'ii0RINC ARoumn ALL 510(S OF EXICAYATKIN, MO (XCA.WIE FOR PADNNG FOUHADATIO N- 10INSTALL UTILMES AND OTHER SITE IMPROVEMENTS. INCLUDNO FRONITAGE IMPR VEMENT& 11. STAWJITE AID COMPOST WEND Au, EXPD5EO SODS PAIGA TO %W&CMDON ON (HIRE 5AFE- 12. ESTABLISH LINOS WMG AND PERMANENT VEGETATION. ALL TEMPORARY EFIOSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE REMOVED UPON FOUL SITE STABILIZATION AND APPROVAL BY CITY INSPECTOR. APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY QF EDMONDS QAm: REVISION OATT EDMONDS 16 SCHODL Dls IN ICE EDMONDS WOODWAY HIGH SCHOOL SYNTHETIC TURF CONVERSION r s ,HOGAN rselw 11e IzmSuo,ao �+V,/T�� fffLjjjl TpEA r4�� q0 . YG �iV�}1,yA �c F EYP-01' qPB L DATE 5-42018 SCALE NTT DRAWN JCH/CPA CHECKED FISH! Q No T.E.S.C.NOTES SHEET F-0.5 Q Packet Pg. 242 LAYOUT LEGEND LANDSCAPE RESTORATION y. •_ _�_,� GREEN SYNTHETIC TURF ®� BROWN SYMHETIC TURF NlV .1pN DAY( PROPOSED JAVELIN LIGHTING FOR EXISTING (2) TENNIS COURTS EDMONDS � 12 DISCUS Is 5 6' SYNTHETIC TURF SCH®L MULTIPURPOSE BASEBALL FIELD WITH FOOTBALL EDMONDS (300' x 160') & SOCCER _ FIELD (300' x 180') WOODWAY y� HIGH SCHOOL PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY SYNTHETICTURF CONVERSION ACRYLIC TENNIS SURFACE r� RUBBERIZED SURFACING PERVIOUS CONCRETE E: •::::" ww'�j PANNG BULLPENS ( 2 ) TENNIS COURTS (2 EACH, 4 TOTAL) WITH LIGHTS BASE BID 3 NET BATTING TUNNEL ALTERNATE BID: 2 BATTING TUNNEL AND STORAGE BUILDING, (1) BATTING TUNNEL PERVIOUS PAVING CONCRETE PAVING 20' SETBACK APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION *Q&" FIELD LIGHTING CITY OF EDMONDS ■ DATE: O TENNIS COURT LIGHTING BY: GTY ENGINB:NNO DNiNON I i r R pp NORTH 0 30' 60' SCALE: 1" = 30' DATE 5A-2018 SCALE DRAWN JCH CHECKED RSH x Quo SITE OVERVIEW SHEET F-1.0 a Packet Pg. 243 7.1.j 1 F-2,9 CATC A a PRYING F-2.1 PROTECT EXISTING NATURAL TURF TO �- REMAIN (TYP) SCORER C. ;m" DRAWINGS. 20' SUIIDN6 SET-ORCK CHAIN UNK FENCE (TrP•) RING NETTINGC 1 TIJ -2.1" "T r • SWINQ I F-2.Y ■END UGIONG . (`+EE ELECTNAIJ4 DNA1tH[5, TIP,] (T++' I Y �� (f "ffii "ffi 77ii "" �� A .-DIIGOUN I I P4+i B EXI A STRONGPOSTS ^' HAlNLINX ENCE {iYP. F-2.4 (RP.) REMAIN CXI '-C1UllPEN S ! $LCKSTGp A (Typ') r-a3 -x.1 MN6 FEHOWNG OUL LINE OW-) *ALL 1F� l YPLATE �NW[f FOUL POLO AND WfNLEO ET WIFE SGH f/ 5TNIINFIELD ( TURN S 6 2,I i.t F-i.l F-3,1 5Y'N.G TURF i "DQ'N� CVRO (TIP.) T CA 5YHT%ETIC TURF ANCHCR AT 5 F•.3Z EDGE CONCRETE CMB () ANCHOR (TIP,) 5INCLE N 2 t F-2.9 CAIE I N 1 N 6VLLPCN- IMsc FIE SSNLD I. rC TURF I 15 WOE WING IRACK 6 r1OOTDWL MARI[IMCS (TIT'.) I F F-2'-1 t 1 1NrR.LCO SY TURF / DHNNIIN G WTRH i+nC 1-} Q ITHI,! OUFFICLO WITH MARKING- AND rw1A oALL MARKINGS ;--'lE N[TTUWG AOOVC II I F-2.1 F-3.1 2.1 I ' TIDE T CATl-94 11 8 A BASH 1 Co F-2a R0"srRwhe ucTUGE `\ MEET AND MATCH EXISTING IS' FENCE 2 F-2.2 FRIE91ORATION P-1 SITE re-Fi (TYP) STORM WARIER FNLIEA 5TRUCTUAE SYNTHETIC TUAF EDD" AANO" Al CONCRETE CURB HYLO� (TYP.) 4k, I . LAYOUT NOTES NOTE LEGEND ((twMODIIrF��TCS GENERAL CONSTIRUCrLON Mom . a• (uHDIuiCS SPCCIFIG CONSTINCUGN KEYNOTE) 1. FURNISH AND INSTALL CONCRETE EDGE ANCHOR DOVE SWING 4 ' AROUND THE ENTIRE PERIMETER OF THE F-x•9 CATE [TIP.]. , _ SYNTHETIC TURF SURFACES AND BATTING Gc;E AREAS. x. SEE CML DRAWINGS FOR STORM DRAINAGE AND GS-MES Tl '�'� ,I ..'.. 'r - .OTHER GENERAL 3. SEE ELECTRICAL SHEETS FOR SCOREBOARD. TE. Cow.T LIGHT F1XTIRES IRRIGATION CONTROLLER, BAIIING CAGE AND K (SEE ELECTRICAL OTHER MISCELLANEOUS POWER SUPPUES. DRM1HN , TYP•] 4. CONCRETE TO MEET AND MATCH FLUSH WITH F-2.1 EXISTING PAVED SURFACES. 5 COORDINATE LOCATION OF FENCE POSTS TO AVOIDEXISTING OR PROPOSED UTILITIES. - -) 8. SEE FENCING LAYOUT PLAN FOR EXTENT AND PROTECT EX1571HQ� ' HEIGHTS OF VARIOUS5 FENCES. SEE DETABS FOR TENNIS COURTS T BLF RDAMR (TTA) CURBS AND FENCES. {TY ) 7. FURNISH AND INSTALL 2 P(ID ANCC SOCCER ` -p•1 GOALS. PROVIDEZ ND ANCHOR WITH TURF - PERVIWS A COVER FOR EACH SOCCER COAL CONkAlE1C F-Z'! B. INSTALL MAX. 1/2- EXPANSION JOINT AT AL PAVING (GYP. , CONCRETE PAYING / BUILDING / WAIL O INTERFACE 73 or 9 ALL CATCH BASIN / TOP INLET GRATES N PATH r$LOT DRAM OF TRAVEL TO HAVE MAX 1/2- OPENINGS IN ALL {FIFA] DIRECTIONS PER CBC. 10, LIMITS DF PERMEABLE AGGREGATE AND $YHRHM TURF INCLUDE ALL FIELD PLAYING SURFACES INCLUDING FOUL TERRITORY. /r1TNC [Typ 3 ��fj�r.•--rrv+:nno..n« -LI � NET pG$t (fYp.) j 11. CONCRETE CONTAINMENT CURB; ALL PERMEABLE AGGREGATE AND SYNTHETIC TURF SURFACES ARE CONTA iA WITHIN ACAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE A l � -2.1 CURB. 1jjC�il 12. SYNTHETIC TURF COLOR CHANGE AND BASE TEN" COUNT MARKINGS SHOWN HERE FOR CLARITY ONLY. (g)FOUL POLES ARE LOCATED N FAR TERRITORY, ] I TERN15 COURT COORDINATED T+IM THE PLACEMENT OF HOME UV G 15XtURES PLATE AT THE DISTANCES INDICATED. (SEE ELECTNCAL OUTSIDE FACE OF BOTH POLES TO FORM A SLOT DRAIN DRAWINGS. TIP.) 90-DEGREE ANGLE WITH THE BACK OF HOME • OjWIUT BA$'N PLATE AT THE APEX TFj. TW 14 RUBBERIZED FIELD EVENT SURFACING OVER CONCRETE PAVING; CONCRETE PAVING TO BE APPROVED FOR PLANARITY TOLERANCES, PROPERLY CURED, AND SEALED OR PRIMED AS SLOT ORAVN A NECESSARY PRIOR TO RUBBERIZED SURFACING INSTALLATION. �) OpN1CFFTE F-x'1 15. CONTRACTOR TO INSURE CONTROL OF PAYING (TIP RU86ERIZED SURFACING OVERSPRAY BY PERFORMING THE WORK UNDER APPROPRIATE �HRT 2.1 CONDITIONS AND PROVIDING ADEQUATE PLASTIC TO ADJACENT C NET POST ) NEARBY IN PROGRESS NEARBY WORK IN PROGRESS OR LANDSCAPE WORK wRFADEs. 1 2 -]-+ 1S. COORDINATE LAYOUT OF ALL UTILITIES WITH THAT �TENNS OF EMBEDDED FEATURES INCLUDING BY NOT LIMITED TO FENCE POSTS, FOUL FOIE, COURT ��OUNDATIONS. F-2.1 2.5 BATING CAGE, AND FILED EVENT SLEEVE FOUNDATIONS, LIGHT POLE AND SCORE BOARD WHEREIN CONFLICT, 1 NOTIFY THE ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY BEFORE MAKING ADJUSTMENTS IN THE FlEID. ORNEWAY (�•] •_ -. - l SLOT OPAIN CATCH EADN _ 1tiT+, LGN pA/MNG .(SEE ELECTRek rf l YRWY,NCS FOR PEOESrA.] CoCUNOWC CB-j13 F-2.2 TYPE I 17- ALL SURFACE TRANSITIONS ARE FLUSH TO TS O4TCH BASRN ADJACENT PROPOSED OR EXISTINO SURFACES. REFER TO THE RELEVANT DRAWING SHEETS AND DETAILS 18. RESTORATION LIMIT SHOWN IN THE MIIIIMUM G _ O R DI w n o LWK FENCE RESRORATIONv- �, _ F_p,T (TYP.) ,->,K,. - I BAnINC TARE F_]•y (TIP.) LAYOUT LEGEND F TURF AND TURF PERMEABLE AGGREGATEAND PERMEABLE SURFACING FZED AND ASPHALT PAVING AND AS I % ASPHALT PAVING PERVIOUS CONCRETE PAVING CONCRETE PAVING ACRYLIC SUMFACING ANTICIPATED UNIT OF DISTURBANCE. ANY ) TTING F-].6 ADOPKXNAL DISTURBANCE CREATED AS A • •- BITTT ty RESULT OF THE CONTRACTORS WORK SHALL BE - I CONCRETE ! RESTORED AS DIRECTED WITHOUT ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION EXCEPT AS AGREED - PAVING (TAN-) F 21 INADVANCE OF THE INITIAL DISTURBANCE. p,yf BUAOKRG SET-BACJC (3) NET BATTING TUNNEL ALTERNATE BID, (2) TTING TUNNEL BUILDING, (1) BATTING TUNNEL AM I I i I I ®0 REMOVE ANDREPLACE CURB RAMP PER OTY OF STANDARD EDMONDS STANDARD DETAILS. LANDSCAPE RESTORATION CHNNLINK FENCE AND CONCRETE CURB CHAINUNK FENCE CONCRETE CURBN/G CONCRETE CUR NO UNIT OF SYNTHETIC TURF AND CONCRETE EDGE ANCHOR CATCH BASIN INLET (C.BA) TYPE 1 �T MAMN INLET (CBI) - 5LOT DRNN Nww�. NETTING ® WALL PAD APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDMONDS DATEr err: r f LfiEIIN REVISION DATE EDMONDS 4 151PIC'T EDMONDS WOODWAY HIGH SCHOOL SYNTHETIC TURF CONVERSION DA HOGAN r.,,w,M�,rnnlw IIo i.o;usww A Eµ(115. U14�, QO�V C� r � � s mE.I•,971� � 4P A Iy�NR NORTH I�i� IO SCALE: 1" = 30' DATE 5d 2018 SCALE 1-30' DRAWN DMD CHECKED NGI ,I o. LAYOUT PLAN SHEET F-1.1 a Packet Pg. 244 6 GRADING NOTES NOTE LEGEND 1. (INDICATES GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTE) Q (INDICATES SPECIFIC CONSTRUCTION KEYNOTE) ".. - . -' - � - _ r ♦� l �, /" ; �, a H�.r Y_ . Pam- f+ .; _ ' 1. THE ERTCONTRACTORa-i SHALL CALL O NOTIFY L'y DIGS BE AT 6DEMC A MINIMUM OF 2 WORKING w,l • �•� F s"••:': + � •.�'�" '� � DAYS BEFORE DEM(X1TION, DIGGING, OR GRADING -_.�S=��• 4r] r •A�..r S .. '. "" OPERATIONS OCCUR. 1 - 7t�'1f�' I. :;t ''!. ).. Ir•r " •` ' „R•'yr;x ,� (' '� {•• _ 2. NEW CONTOURS SHOWN ARE FINISH GRADE r •' 1 - .. ASPHALT ' • • �iL( . ELEVATIONS. .� o.r I .F..S 2. PAVDIF]'fl .1 '+ . ,\ �, +• 3. BACKFlLL AND COMPACT EXCAVATED AREAS fCB-• f a AFI ll RESULTING FROM DEMOLITION ACIMTIES WITH SELECT FILL TO 951E WITH 12' MAX UFTS. 7..iL7 � T 1 ' •• ly f r + � r r' 4. STRIP FIELD AREA OF EXISTING SGD AND ORGANI MATCH1 ' '• �2 ADJUST R1N • - - r MATERIALS AND DISPOSE OF OFF SITE. ALL A2 ��D 41 Y..T0 4 •. i EXCESS AND UNSUITABLE SOIL MATERIALS SHALL 19A3 al .3I1 t . REMOVED AND DISPOSED OF OFF SITE. . • ,�,� , 7.�p r' 417 ,, r• 17. H I 5 THE CONTRACTOR 51WL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER 17�D ✓ CLEANXXJT i-2.S I r" '• GROUNDWATER OR qTHE EVENT OR D � µ IES IN THE OF POOR DDSTII _ _ RIM 4, 7.40 x TM 421.50 417.]O. 4/7.70 _' 1 CONDITIONS A5 NOTED ON THE PUNS. •��R 1� FG 41771) TW 417.]0 Q - -TO 415.96 6. ALL PERIMETER PAVING SHALL MEET AND MATCH I _ 1 W: 41S.66 -• SW 4to 4117j BO FO i14.54 ' �`.. • • i ` N err ADJACENT SURFACES. • - -moo _ ' r 7. THE FINISH GARDE AND CORRESPONDING SUBGW a57.pp' 'S'1•R {1 i•--: ELEVATIONS CAN BE ADJUSTED AS APPROVED BY •1 'l: _ THE PRO9CT ENGINEER AT THE ON:OYCTWS TO 421 ; �. r 900[i£BOAI� TO' - - 56 73' la,Sa 415. FG a17 ! r ( REMAIN f' , . TYPE 1 CA7'UI�B151H II ', OPTION TD REDUCE E1�ORT OR WPM +4 '1 • REQUIRED FOR SUEr_CRA0E ESTFBUSIINF7:T, THE B1Y 41AD0 / r .•F RIM 417.00 ,\ s4.50' n 14 - 41 FOLLOWING CONCRETE ` J { h r F_2,2 -�. iF 41'7 DWI. ' ' 415, r APPROVAL,CONOIILOH5 WRl FKWH7E TO fALM CURB WALL 2.1 ,2.E THE �71y a17.3O ! .• :r 41!70 ` r•r�ID5 ,' 3 6 ar ,�p ' A FINISH GRADE ANOMCORRESPDHgNGESUBGRA FIG 417.30 7 .1• §', .. .k' i F..2�2 -x-1 ,, �t ELEVATIONS IN WRITING TO THE ENGINEER FT BW 41680 v _ �} I L T" ' E. j .r '•Y AiF f APPROVAL PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH THE I xxrr ' 7'fl ROUGH GRADING FOR SUBGRADE S-I.OX t. 4,• _ r�: r - f J ESTABLISHMENT. THE PROPOSED FINISH GRADE OF THE FIELD FG 417.]0, �� - - '•� •ry j♦♦�} 14.xi INSTM.L SOLID Y B. AND CORRESPONDING SUBGRADE ELEVATIONS F _ L covet MAY BE ADJUSTED BETWEEN +0.0' AND -0.; 37,yy y . _ - - -• '+./ THE AMOUNT OF ADJUSTMENT IN THE FINISH j �_ ff f• U CB- 7- 4 r ELEVATIONS SHALL BGRADE AND E CORRESPONDING ACROSS ••` [• I r r ` •» �SU341�„ TCH BASIN F_27 r x.. ..w.. ENTIRE FIELD AREA AND PERIMETER AREAS f 4'�'- i !"TC a17AG iC SS.nO THE SL ES AND GRADE rr a 1' Jr: ■ • ` i FG, 414.50 TC 41688 I„ Fo 70 SHOWN NON THE OWING RAD C PLAN AND ANYSITIO I43b.9B FC 414.'j4 �T `': CORRESPONDING DETAILS SUITABLE TO MEET 7 414.Sa AND MATCH EXISTING coaomanre AND GRAD ' I `' -1 1 1 ] I l l l � i • - - � F'0,f417.00 41 _ Y !}'I.EA - r C. THE PROJECT ENGINEER WILL REVISE AND F ` I •} w REISSUE THE GRADING PLAN AND THE DROWN 4f7.30 I ~ + a,3,9 _ _. PLAN WITHIN ONE WEEK OF THE CONTRACTO SL �H (A� � r• 7C WRITTEN SUBMITTAL OF THE PROPOSED FlNI'. s• I I lI} " i .. •- .. ./ 417 GRADE AND CORRESPONDING SUBGRADE J6M 417.95 ej'i raja ELEVATIONS. ESE REVISED DRAAWNNGS WIU .5.1.OI% -�' �/ / • iJI /' % BE INCORPORATED INTO THE CONTRACT WITH • IOTA LF CHANGE IN THE CONTRACT AMOUNT. +FG'17.J0 i6 � 1�5 .. B. DIG AT .ERTANTRTCTOR SHALL -CALL MCN NOTIFY OF 57.25 ^, I I I 1! 1 j °+' ti �.• .y rti 3 r ff''�} WORKING GAYS BEFORE DEMOLITION, DIGGING, 0 GRADING OPERATIONS OCCUR. ��J (rTr f Y. IT4S ;•� I -[[[�" IL NEW CONTOURS SHOWN ARE FINISH GRADE j} J II • b •R 6. ELEVATIONS. ,7]x C7AgB� WYLL -i.'1 I ,10. BACKFILL AND COMPACT EXCAVATED AREAS +• 111 I I I I, .. -\ 41 30 .,i��I �.. RESULTING FROM DEMOUTION ACTIVITIES WITH S-I-Ox I ;1 �•, t h SL OR✓M!I 1 SELECT FILL TO B5X WITH 12• MAX UFTS Y 7.30 ` t t�7I1 I+I1r r1.' A yam' 2gUM F 23 i41 L,6 :., 13 F-22 11. FURNISH AND INSTALL PERMEABLE FIELD BASE l0 j {� MATERIALS FOR THE SYNTHETIC TURF FIELD ARE / NYLOPLA57 BASIN ] TC 412.95 p G � 1�N INCLUDING 8 ACHES M,NIMUN OF BASE COURSI ;1 412.93 1 e-p-.flf RN alA]0 I. S.D�O 473. �� .f. r PERMEABLE AGGREGATE AND 2 INCHES MINIMUM �y TOP COURSE PERMEABLE AGGREGATE. RGI� RE F-2.3 V17.95 TC a13.0O {•f 5a954t2.9Y RIM 4tONT 08_+11 .F .! 12. THE SYNTHETIC TURF INFlLL SHALL HATCH RUS F..2S `'- 1 RDA 477i6 - WITH THE PERIMETER CONCRETE CURB AND/OR CONCRETE PAVING R�]� WMl 13 WSW To PLAN AA61US1TiD RADED TO NRAL TUR M GFIMBBINCS AND SANG. MAXIMUM SLOPE TO 81 5 3 4:1, WITH FINAL SHAPE TO BE FEW APPROVED 41 1' �.rpy _ yj JL, 1$ ` + 31 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, ADJUST RIM AT EXISTING CATCH F 4f7 a16 - J j 111^ .'il" 14 AND MATCH NEW FINISH GRADE SIN TO MEF l TYPE 1 GPpI@aAN .-CB-�17- AIM 45dAQ':. F-2.2 r .r"..n. - �'.0�1�'1"`• � TYPE 2 OATpI 61151I1 ROW .I ^FF F '� �' �- �r� i.']Ci"-'•' -__��•. ��:�' CONTROL STRUCTURE 41ii Rw of ali ee,a ze �� -�a �-r�l FIELD ELEVATIONS GRADING LEGEND SYNTHETIC TURF FIELD: EXISTING CONTOUR LINES CATCH BASIN INLET (C.B.1,) CATCH, MULTIPURPOSE Fl� MULTIPURPOSE FIELD, .1752 .1 SPOT ELEVATION TYPE CATCH 6LSIN INLET (C.B.L) FINISH GRADE OF SYNTHETIC TURF INFlLL 417.30 417� NEW CONTOUR LINES TYPE 2 FINISH GRADE OF SUPPLEMENTAL PAD: FINISH GRADE OF TOP COURSE PERMEABLE AGGREGATE: 417.17 417.03 S.2.OR- SURFACE SLOPE ® RETAINING WALL/ CURB FINISH GRADE OF BASE COURSE PERMEABLE AGGREGATE: 416,66 419.a4 c SUBGRADE ELEVATION: _ COM53 NT SURFACE SLW'E _ MATCH TO EXISTING = CHAWLNK FENCE AND CONCRETE CURB FENCE APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDMONDS ' UMIT OF PERMEABLE CHANLNK DATE! -;Vw AGGREGATE TW 417.55 TOP OF WALL ELEVATION 9v- I(nawwhars below. OW 4.11.40 BOTTOM OF WALL ELEVATION Call before you (fig. REVISION DATE EDMONDS Is I 1 EDMONDS WOODWAY HIGH SCHOOL SYNTHETIC TURF CONVERSION DA HOGAN r.,oe,w,.,A,,,suu ixmxu um co9EK1 s 'T4Ap�D r •� M1 A 71.[ P.011 �,•,� A 2 NORTH � D30'O SCALE: 1"= 30' DATE 5-4-20UI SCALE 1-.]4 DRAWN JOIN CHECKED RSH nax Qzox GRADING PLAN SHEET F-1.2 .r a Packet Pg. 245 7.1.j 4 7 F-2.Z C8- e " 1 TYPE 7 CRTL71 RBI 40,0 111(01) 4.50 B•, f 97 LF i B CPEP s-0.50% ,I I CB-/S •' j TYPE I CATCH BASIN 41M.0 I.E. RI41BL3(B'0 I N 4J`E. S 414.00 (B') 1 l` 97 LF I B' CPEP S-O.SOi iuix 1:- ,- I I .� 1 lhiI I ! J .4 +y I � ' filIt . •r•, ..w F 2.2 j - I - - �lAl-` 14 CEP TYPE 1 cArcH B44u+Jq INT17iRIM Ej05TIN0 RPE - - Ei. MATCH R81 ANO IXVER'f Ta� . MATCH EXI B2 A _` ... 135 LF WALLS OOTINOPE ro DRAIN/� � �-� L�.�' 1�9 1t5 LF/' "ITS41F'4'OQB'[ �"r WALL FOOTING DRAIN, /!' fi :i T!""'�"• . `~ SLOPE TO DRAIN / �/ 1 gg //44 TPE I CATCE[CBAy1N RIM.4I e.e0 INTERCEPT Lwss9IG 6 PVC 10 I I.0 W 411M (FIELD CON 51 lFJ I.E. N 4" (te B" CPEP L8- SE 41138 (e s-0 Sots CB-j3 TYPE 2 CATCH BASIN AND FLOW- O IROL STRUCTURE 1 RIM 410-97 - I F_ .B I.E. NW 411.09 (8") IE HE 412.14(127 LE- SE 411.09 (127 '�- 41F IZ omp \ `-•. .TYPE 2 CATCHWATER DUALRY STRUCTURE 1 RIM 417-30 I.E. NW 411.GS (12') F-2.2 IE SE 409.25 (12') Po. 411,51 SE 408-84 12-) F-2.2 I.E SE 40B.B4 (127 DRAINAGE TABLE u LENGTH W-1B 13 LF W-1 15 LF '1 4529 415 OB 414.26 30L 1W-2 4529415 06414418 W-3 45LF 52 41OB 4 1014.95 W-28 61 LF 415.294.98 41223 E-1A 52 LF 4155.29 E-8 3B LF41.29 baLF 4.19E-1 52 4150 4144..216 61 LF 44 5.29 45.O6B4 8E-2 E-3 96 LF 415.06 41411 E-28 58LF 415,27 412.98 41223 ALL SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE LATERALS BELOW WELLED SYNTHETIC TURF ARE 4" PERFORATED _PEP DRAIN TUBING, SLOPING AT 0.50% TOWARDS COLLECTOR SIM 417,00 I.E. E 414.74 X�l' LE.,W 414.74 lLIFE " 4142 /1 � C6W0Bi PoN 417,{0 [�.i.♦< 414 4a A -. p . n1N SOLID LOCK94G DO SO D LOCK MYIDPIAST BASH WITH SOuO LO16 LIQ 4 RIM 417.18 IE W 410.28 (e7 F..2-y IE NE 410-02 (B') IE N 410.28(B") IE S 410 28 (B7 IE N 408.95 (87 IE E 408.95 (12-) DRAINAGE LEGEND E . - END CAP - • - • - 4' PERF CORR. POLY DRAIN TUBING CPEP SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE COLLECTOR OR STORM DRAIN PIPE S-O.SOx SLOPE E FLOW DIRECTION IE 4-15.30 INVERT ELEVATION F.t /�rT DRAINAGE NOTES ;•i%• NOTE LEGEND 1. (:M0_ATES GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTE) 30 (INDICATES SPECIFIC CONSTRUCTION KEYNOTE) 1, SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE COLLECTOR PIPE CAN BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF THE . _ _ FIELD SUBGRADE 2. COORDINATION: IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO ENSURE THAT THE IRRIGATION PIPING IS INSTALLED AT A SUFFICIENT DEPTH BELOW SUBGRADE BEFORE THE TRENCHING FOR THE SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE SYSTEMS TO AVOID CONFUCTS BETWEEN SYSTEMS. J. YRENCHNG FOR THE SUBSURFACE DRAYAGE LATERALS SMALL NOT PROCEED UNTIL 7TE LIGATION SYSTiU PIPING RAS BEEN aAGRFSV.Eb ATPMDANO IE FE1D SIBRAE IS.4. TRENCH EXCAVATION SHALL BE MADE TO THE ALIGNMENT, ELEVATION, GRADE AND SLOPE AS INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS. TRENCHING SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED UTILIZING EQUIPMENT WITH SLOPE AND DEPTH CONTROL, SUCH AS -LASER PLANE CONTROL SYSTEM', SO AS TO ENSURE fy ACCURACY IN THE BOTTOM OF THE TRENCH- 5. NO HIGH POINTS ABOVE DESIGNATED INVERT OR CALCULATED TRENCH BOTTOM ELEVATION WALL BE PERMITTED. NO SLOUGHING OF SITE MATERIAL OR LOOSE EXCAVATED SOIL WILL BE PERMITTED TO REMAIN IN THE TRENCHES. _ 6. SURPLUS ENCAVATED SOIL SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE FIELD AREA PRIOR TO COMMENCING ON THE NEXT ADJACENT TRENCH. EXCAVATED MATERIAL MAY NOT REMAIN ON SUBGRADE. 7 PROVIDE A SMOOTH, EVEN SUBGRADEAFTER REMOVAL OF THE TRENCH MATERIAL E TO BE COMPACTED RARE LEAVE NOO LOOSE LOOSE MATERIAL ON THE SUBGRADE e. EXCAVATION BELOW INVERT GRADE MUST BE ESTABLISHED TO A DEPTH SO AS 70 PROVIDE FOR M SPECFIED PLACEMENT OF PEA GRAVEL BEDDING AT BOTTOM OF PIPE ELEVATION PRIOR TO LAYING THE PERFORATED PIPE. 9, NO FOREIGN MATERIAL WILL BE PERMITTED INSIDE, � ALONGSIDE, UNDER, OR ON TOP OF THE E, I PERFORATED DRAIN PIPE 10. THE BACKFILL FOR ALL PERFORATED PIPE SMALL BE CLEAN WASHED PEA GRAVEL REFER TO THE SPECFICATIONS FOR THE GRADATION I� REQUIREMENTS. �. 11, ALL TRENCHES TO HAVE MATERIAL -CROWNED' A MINIMUM OFF 2- Y ABOVE SUBGRADE TO PROTECT FROM FOREIGN MATERIAL AND PROVIDE FOR EASE OF LOCATION ON ID IDENTIFICATION. CROWNS WITH REMOVED MATERIAL PLACEMENT OF SHALL BE REMOVED PRIOR 70 PLACEMENT OF • •• BASE AGGREGATE 12. DURING PLACEMENT OF SPECIFIED TRENCH BACKFlLL PIPE MUST BE HELD IN PLACE TO PREVENT DISPLACEMENT AND PROVIDE FOR ACHIEVING SPECIFIED INVERT ELEVATION. DO NOT i • ^ DAMAGE PIPE OR ALLOW PIPE TO BE DISPLACED i BY PLACEMENT OF BACKFlLL MATERIAL 13. CAP THE ENDS OF ALL LATERAL RUNS. ALL OPEN T?� i ENDS DURING CONSTRUCTION ARE TO BE CATCH BA51N TEMPORARILY CAPPED OR PLUGGED. RIM 410.3t I.E. W 407.24 (127 14� COw+ECT10II OF IATE]iA1G TO CA -LECTOR DRAINS EX I.E. NJ 511A11. BE MADE N1T}I A COMBIHAT[DII REDUCING 405.24t (15/18-) TEE no REDUCING SADDLE TEL FIELD VERIFY 15. IEO TRUCKS OR EOU PMENT WILL BE ALLOT TO DRIVE CYER THE TOR OF THE TRENCHES EXCEPT 1• TPACKfOU IlPED MACHINIEIT1• UTIYM 01 F-2.2 S REAGI IC BASE 0 GREGATE EACKFI11E0 TgE OES ARE TO RE STAKED AND FLAGGED J' ABOVE GRADE AT MAXIMUM 10' SPACING FOR k IDENTITY. COORDINATE SUBSURFACE DRIWYCE COLLECTOR LOCATION TO AVOID FENCE POST LOCATIDHS. �• 17 ADJUST MATCH AT EXISTING CATCH BASIN TO MEET IA;•<N FLOW AND NEW FINISH GRADE IE E 408.50 (12-) IE SW 408.40 (6- UNDERORAIN) f F-7A CATCHIN INLET (CBI) TYPE 1 ® CATCH BASIN INLET (CBI) TYPE 2 o C EANOUT EXISTING CATCH BASIN INLET m SLOT DRAIN CATCH BASIN SLOT DRAIN APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDMONDS • DATE: ar. m EDMONDS Is SCHCQ)L I• EDMONDS WOODWAY HIGH SCHOOL SYNTHETIC TURF CONVERSION IJ l r f HOGAN ' � a e dye � rxP.71 E NORTH 0 30' GO, SCALE: 1"= 30' DATE 5A-2019 SCALE I'-30' DRAWN Km CHECKED RSH MQw DRAINAGE PLAN SHEET F-1.3 a Packet Pg. 246 T fij..0. 1, 3 -. -- - 11 1 �l , — ll j i ;OUCK 4, COUPLER Y& . - Ill .', j�: k afiI Y I v Wry FMICAT" OcAlvaos 10 FIELD AREA )i I11I fl l 1�_ o, F T _ _ _- ow r Al ,GuIQK COLFPLER VALVE T5 r-la ODUPLrR VALVE ZIA r\ X- < acV15 T7 COUPLER VALVE *DICK COUPaR VALVE AM t DUm =,,x- L li I wl NEW I EI�tw WRCATA)m 9111 5)15TEIWI Na �In of 4• _f.T-SW NOTE LEGEND 'INM E: OENCIRAL CONSMUCTION NOX) IRRIGATION NOTES NZ IFIC CONSTRUCTION KMOTE) IRRIGATION LEGEND � I' QUICK COUPLER VALVE AND BOX NEW IRRIGAM" M709 X 2' CATE VALVE AND BOX SCH 40 PVC IRRIGATION MAN UNE AQILISTED IXISTING SCH 40 PVC PIPE (LATERAL) IRRIGATION SYSTEM B"Tmm mn EDMONDS Is SCHGDL -I 1 0 1 C I EDMONDS WOODWAY HIGH SCHOOL SYNTHETIC TURF CONVERSION rl DAHOGAN d NORTH a 30' W SCALE: 1" = 30' DATE 5-4-2.18 SCALE llw DRAWN JCH CHECKED RSH IRRIGATION PLAN SHEET F-1.4 I Packet Pg. 247 1 7.1.j �* M LL^'�{�.�H, i§711�� I PIPE 6Pft towm t]ONA { .J ' STRONG � - STRONG POST 1 CI-MLFNK F4.9 f7OlCE [M7'P.) L�� D21 POTDdIAL SLOPES 0WATER THAN 3.1 COORCIMTE POSE FOOTM DEPTH PER- ottm 2 UK SHEET F--2.i NOTE 6 {ryp-7 EIANETALtI•LY "'• 1 Fltlmli FENCE TYPE KEY U 40' HEIGHT CHAIN LIME FENCE; 2" MESH X5 10' HEIGHT CHAIN LINK FENCE; 2' MESH GAUGE BELOW 10'. X9 GAUGE ABOVE 10', X9 CAUCE. TOP, MID=. BOTTOM RAIL TOP AND S' INTERMEDIATE RAILS. INSTALL 2A10 SRIPSGARDS 1' GZAIR FROM FINISH © 6' NOW CHAIN LINK FENCE; 2" MESH GRADE, X9 GAUGE TOP, MIDIXE. BOTTOM RAIL ® 40' OVERALL.• 10- HB09 CHAIN LINK FENCE: © DISCUS CAGE UPRIGHT 2' MESH X9 GMIGE, TOP, MIDDLE, BOTTOM RAIL 70' X2SO. ® FENCE CAP NYLON NETTING ABOVE © 25' HEIGHT OVERALL; 10' HEIGHT CHAIN UNK FOUL POLE FENCE; 2' MESH X9 GAUGE, TOP. MIDDLE. © OUTFIELD SM BOTTOM RAIL 13' X2S0. NYLON NETTING ABOVE ® BATTING CAGE TUNNEL/ BUILDING 10' HEIGHT CHIN UNK FENCE: 1.75' MESH Q SLIGHT OBSCURING FABRIC X9 GAUGE, TOP, MIDDLE, BOTTOM RAIL All Tit r, Df$IDESm. F]DSIINo .I r .! •f Iz.�LL 6132 F�FHWCE � TH 1 10oWM — 141fM .. !!LF I+ —ad l00 LF �,„ J V"LTACKSEOp � WV,G —. �FT7,GI1C {EYP.) . G F FENCING AND FENCE I 7 CAP (GYP.) 'z., -2.1 GATE TYPE KEY (ALL CHAINLINKi <1 t5' DOUBLE 5A'lYG AT, (2 . 7. 9') ® 10' DOUBLE SWING GATE (2 A V) © S' SINGLE SWING GATE O V SINGLE SWING GATE © V OPENING (NO LEAF) W SINGLE SWING GATE STHtgVo O rxlpA TRONk' 8 f® 1EHNA9 CDURT A1 G 1FQ i5 1 ,ol V y tol LF i IENNp CpN C� XETTHC (1,1 Cmr4uNK FENCING (TYR) l F-29 101 Lf N9r J' I 11 ' 1 I 4 IIIII FOUL { P�Q+wD ag�ts APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION MG) a Y+ CITY OF EDMONDS Ls F-]S SAT-11 I".ST F .. ROTE LEGEND FENCING NOTES A Pl-=Cam L CFONs 10N XE�YNO)YE, Q END FENCE. MEET AND MATCH EXISTING FENCE TO PROVIDE SECURITY ENCLOSURE 2 FENCE ADJACENT TO PROPERTY LINE TO BE LOCATED 12' INSIDE PROPERTY LINE ]. GATE LOCATIONS ARE SHOWN APPROXWTEI-Y. 4. GATES TO BE COMM AT PERPENDICULAR PATHWAYS WHEN OCCURS. S. ALL CATES ARE LOCKABLE. 6. INSTALL LACK BACK POST ON ALL SWING GATES. Sr. . FENCING LEGEND CFWNUNK FENCE AND CONCRETE CURB s tit CHAINUNK FENCE C0,0LETE CUFBNG DOSTING FENCE TO REMAIN ---�— FENCE TYPE AND UNIT GATE TYPE PIPE 6 EXTRA STRONG • PipeB EXTRA EIORA 91RONO RWI510N DATE ts EDMONDS WOODWAY HIGH SCHOOL SYNTHETIC TURF CONVERSION Kroo- �l DA HOGAN ?�0 sAt44p�4 r 1pR O d��$f.rr.91t� P AR NORTH D�LT SCALE: 1" = 30' OA1T 54-2016 SCALE 1"=30' DRAWN DMD CHECKED RSH xr o- FENCING PLAN SHEET F-1.5 Q Packet Pg. 248 i %j LS f L L I D a L +, L I rl ,I>,I I >, Iffy," r� I "°L � fx15AnG NATURAL TURF -00 Nor DISTURB- r_ Tip - I L , LAYOUT LEGEND ACER RUBRUN RED SUNSET P � N >pr CARPINUS BETUWS q 1D THUJA OCCIDENT/JJS PYRAMDIALIS COMMON NAME SIZE M. RED SUNSET MAPLE 2.5' CAL/ 12- HT. 14 EUROPEAN HORNBEAM 2- CAL/ 10' HT. 6 ARBORVITAE 5 CAL/ 6' HT. 13 SEEDED NATURAL TURF GREEN SYNTHETIC TURF ® BROWN SYNTHETIC TURF 25-C-D- �Yi"�i-srr. f xrw ACRYLIC TENNIS SURFACE RUBBERIZED SURFACING PERVIOUS CONCRETE PAVING APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION p08pm FIELD LIGHTING CITY OF EDMONDS TENNIS COURT UGHTING DAM: EXISTING VEGETATION TO BY: REMAIN C+TM HIGIRF➢4NcoNIsxW REV610N DATE EDMONDS is 5Cli�L EDMONDS WOODWAY HIGH SCHOOL SYNTHETIC TURF CONVERSION �I X pW , HOGAN H Bents .14 RO r � P CGS �tl+xr. efe•l' C4 aE AR NORTH D�P SCALE: J" = 30' DATE SJ 201R SCALE DRAWN 1CH E11WR.D AS71 LANDSCAPE PLANTING PLAN SHEET F-1.6 Q Packet Pg. 249 INFILLED STLOHETLC rY $SUM SUPPLEMENTAL 12.2' BASE COURSE, PERMEABLE AGOREGATE COMPACTED SUBORADE ' MIN. SYNTHETIC TURF FIELD SECTION NOT TO SCALE ASPHALT PAYING (2n6 LIFT) 2' ASPHALT PAYING (Lt LIFT) 6' BASE AGGREGATE COMPACTED SUBGRADE LATERAL SPACING 15, TW. Pf1UO&E STRVCRWJW SGL BEARING 'T'" .0 t' CLEAN. WASHED PEA GRAVEL AS NECESSARY PEA GRAVEL INSTALLATICH 2' 12' FOR LEVELING. TO FULL OEM OF TRENCH 2' CRm_ 4' PERF. CORR. POLY. ,IN. —' DRAIN TUBING SECTIONASPHALT PAVING NOT TO SCALE ASPHALT PAVPPC TO K FLUSH WITH TOP OF CUREANG TERMINATE ACRYLIl SUWACING SYSTEM AT ACRYLIC SURFACING CONCRErE CURBINE SYSTEM I-)j* CLASS J' HMA PAVING SEE GRADING SHCET M SURFACE SLOPE I -A' CLASS I' HMA PAYING 1 !/J/.t//.//,I/J�fIJi//J//l.If�/J////.��/fJ 5' ME AGGREGATE,, r. /T: off ►. <lt_ifra ili�!if 1ilJ �LffilTCa�� TENNIS COURT SECTION NOT TO SCALE I COMPACTED SUBGRAOE 5' PERVIOUS CONCRETE PAVING 6' PERMEABLE BASE COURSE Y I• —III—} 1 •' •'" •• •'"� f—! I I —I I� s SUBGRADEToasxl IIIIIIIIII MIN.va _ u PERMEA6LC SNRIPMRAL P12 I ISEEL BEAR6NG PBA GRAVLL ISb7/LLJ�IIM F,BC 2' iD FULL OEM OF TRENCH k R' cram, E5 4' PERF. CORR. POLY. MIN. [ GRAN TUBING 3 PERVIOUS COHCREfE_P&ING-4 999 IEIALKHIAY 4 l PERVIOUS CONCRETE PAVING NOT TO SCALE SUDGRADI Cm#jam 1 F-R.A F{NhNG CONCRETE CVFB Oft MALL WITH FENCING EXPMS" JOINT SEALANT / I • r EXPANSION JOINT � 3/6' EXPANSION\A J ., 4' BAND WITH JOINT POLYURETHANE 2' 2' SMOOTH FINISH CENTERED ON JOINT SEALANT 1— EXPANDED JOINT PAM MPACTID_ / i5X MIN. ,&_9goS3b.1E PAYING AT DPANlOIR_ANM HAND -TOOLED WEAKENED PLANE JOINT, DEPTH EQUAL 23X OF THE SLAB THICKNESS 4 d F aa• .v� .ayp .09 adv I' SUB um COMPACTED 3fi=1 l 1 N : _ I �— TO INSET BUN. 11I- & L'bu`AFiE PAVIRNC 1r7N N£AXEREu PE-+1I@ dDtYT CONCRETE PAVING NOT TO SCALE 4" CONCRETE PAVING LIGHT BROOM FINISH rax5A GAUGE WELDED WIRE MESH 4' CRUSHED CQURSE SURFACING TOP �Q]� 67fPA/SLON JDMTT TO BE INSTALLED AT ALL. iNIERFACE BE(IIEEH 00"CREIE MING AND VERTICAL MALL OR E)ASnNC CONCRETE PAYING 4' CONCRETE PAYING LIGHT BROOM FINISH �m F�DED WEL 4' CRUSHED SURFACM TOP COURSE AN90H JOINT TO BE INSTALLED AT ALL INTERFACE BETWEEN CONCRETE PAVING AND VERTICAL WALL OR DUSTING CONCRETE PAVING SODDED LANDSCAPE RESTMTION 4' SOIL MIX S' PERVIOUS 4' ZONE; THOROUGHLY ODNCRETE PAYING � ROTOTTIL 4' SOR 1NX AND V OF PREPARED SUGORADE TO 4' PREPARED \\\ t DEPTH OF 6" B" PERMEABLE BASE SUBGARDEt • %' 1.,�...1 COURSE .. / NpSTURBLV UNDISTURBED �; SITE SOIL SITE SOIL 6 SITE RESTORATION SOIL BASED F-2.1 NOT TO SCALE APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDMONDS DATE' BY: cml� FE.EA..9TN•WN REVISION DATE LDMOI III ts tiC:}I[dli, i I I EDMONDS WOODWAY HIGH SCHOOL SYNTHETIC TURF CONVERSION HOGAN 4pT 5. „4q A r moo$ A DATE 5-42018 SCALE NTS DRAWN ICH CHECKED RSH xr Qua TYPICAL SECTIONS SHEET F-2.1 a Packet Pg. 250 CPEP COLLECTOR PIPE J (SEE DRAW:E PLAN L FOR INVERTS) t8' WIN q PRECAST CONCRETE C.B.I. w. INTERNAL DIMENSIONS- 'r�I 26% K 22'W X 40'D I-L yPy yy03�4--� T_Vyy9V�� 2 TYPE 1 CATCH BASIN NOT TO SCALE APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDMONDS STORMFILTER TREATMENTCAPACITY IS A FUNCTION OF THE CARTRIDGE SELECTION AND THE NUMBER OF CARTRIDGES. THE STANDARD MANHOLE STYLE IS SHOWN WITH THE MAXIMUM NUMBER OF CARTRIDGES (7} VOLUME SYSTEM IS ALSO AVAILABLE WITH MAXIMUM T CARTRIDGES. 072' MANHOLE STORMFILTER PEAK HYDRAULIC CAPACITY IS 1.5 CFS. IF THE SITE CONDITIONS EXCEED 1.5 CFS AN UPSTREAM BYPASS STRUCTURE IS REQUIRED. CARTRIDGE SELECTION - 1. CONTECH TO PROVIDE ALL MATFUlW,5 UNLM NOW OfHEIR11SE 2. DIMENSIONS MARKED WITH () ARE REFERENCE DIMENSIONS- ACRIAL DIMENSIONS MAY WARY. 3, FOR SITE SPECFFIC DRANTICS WITH DETALED YAl1LT oIME71SI0N5 AND WEIGHTS. PLEAS£ COMFACT YWR CONTECN FIICINEEIO'D SOLUTKr75 LLC REPRESIXTATNE w�F.MRLTER WATER DUALITY rry BE IN ACCORELAIICE 1FR}i ALL 4. WATER .;.,_ N1 00111NX ON CdITAINED IN TEAS DRMAINC. FOR Rd DESIGN DATA AND INFORMATION DESIGN 09A / 5.` L MEET Ak LOAD LOVEA AssuILOW. THE AT. OR BELOW, THE CROUN PIPE OF 0' - 5 00TER ELEVATION PAT . UUME O' - SAND CRal"EER EEE IN of ZIM TD GROVNDIYATER INVETT EEEVAEASII AhSO FT S AND E 11%g I3EVATKAN, CASTINGS SHALL IIfIY AVASNTO R]p6 Iylp BE LAST WITH THE S SHALL CONTECH LOGO• 8. FILTER C WMD(IES SHALL BE WMA-FILIED, PANSM. yPFgN ACRLSATED• R/DUL FLOW. AND SELF CLEARING, RADIAL MEDIA Df.M S%ML BE 7-641'.HES. FILTER MEDIA CONTACT TIW WiALL OE AT LEAST 59 SECONDS, FLOATABLES 7. SPECIFIC FTDW RATE IS EQUAL. TO THE FILTER TREATMENT CAPACITY (CP77 r BAFFLE J DIVIDED BY THE FILTER CONFACf SURFACE AREA (eq R). f � liY� IR}u IT��B 6 1. ANY SUB -SASE. BACRFlLL DEPTA, AN ANTI -FLOTATION ARE IONS SPECIFIED BY SITE -•SPECIFIC OESIpI CONSIDERATIONS AND SHWA tlE SPE[8}ID BY ENDIfEF.R OF RECORD. 2. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE EQUIPMENT WITH SUFFICIENT LIFTING AND REACH CAPACITY TD LIFT AND SET THE STORMFlLTER STRl1CTURE (UFTING CLINCHES INSOX HEIGHT PRD'JIOEO77� V TYPICAL 3. C'ONTRACfOR TO INSTALL JOINT SEALANT BETWEEN ALL STRUCTURE SECTIONS INSIDE PlEm F 6' TTPK'!W AND ASSEMBLE STRUCTURE. 4. OONTRACIOR TO PROVDE, HSTALE AND GROUT WLET pWE(S} HYDRAULIC DROP _ S STORMFILTER EQUIPPED WTK ACONTR*CM TO PROVIDE ANDpDIAMETERSTALL OUL DIAMETER HOPE OUTLET STU6 � SAND (H) INLET INV. OOLIAR. IF OUTLET ME TS LARGER TWA 5 PCHM COWIIACTOR TO REIIOVaE TO OUTLET INV. THE 6 WCH OUTLET STUB AT MOLDRT7 IN CUT LINE- COUPLM BY FERMCO OR EQUAL ANO FROADED BY CONTRACTOR. 6. COTRACFOR TO TAKE APPROPRIATE MEASURES TO PROTECT CARTRIDGES FROM - CONSTRUCTION -RELATED EROSION RUNOFF. V-OUTLETSUMP `'RD SECTION A -A f, I a L 11 6 ['1 /1 I 't I • CONCRETE WALL -2.1 1111'ANAON TOOLED V I �I l•I DIUINACE I' Y ACID SPoRf �O N �' e t 81 2000 CHANNEL •1 At �� ' �—I � r ,, i' �� i tl• ` x �I1 i � I � I d Y• 11�-•- —I I - 3 SLOT DRAIN F-2.2 NOT TO SCALE SITE SPECIFIC DATA REQUIREMENTS STRUCTURE ID C642 WATER QUALITY FLOW RATE NISI 0.051 P5m Ft Qw AATE dA B. T06 RETURN PERM OF PFA6 FLOW { PI IUXWrt CARTRIDGE HERUNT!2P. T6•, LAW DROPILD to NUMBER of CARTRIOOESREQLIIREO ] WaikXxXFLOWRATE It.i6 MEDIA TYPE IPERLITE• Z G, PSORB PSOPIH PIPE DATA: LE. MATERIAL DIAMETER INLET PWE II,417 05 CPE T2' INLET PIPE #2 OUTLET PIPE 140925 17 RYA ELOYATTOM N 1T-30 IXN 6A3iA$T YYKIIH WA XFIDNT INF AL REQUIREMENTS: ffPERE'CNPGINEEROF RECORD 100, , � I CO NVIIEM WALL _ 6 x. t EXPANSION J ••ti • TDOLm EDGE 00n 0625' L 8.1' 14 I •II I � 8• 6. �� I 4. I' I 4 SLOT DRAIN CATCH BASIN F-2.2 I NOT TO SCALE ALy1SftlF CAR EDMONDS 5 SCl(®L N"T EDMONDS WOODWAY HIGH SCHOOL SYNTHETIC TURF CONVERSION HOGAN seine, w•.n,�seAio�11p imcvsaeo SA DATE Sa.TITe SCALE Pas DRAWN Xm CHTOO.O PSH DRAINAGE DETAILS SHEET F-2.2 a Packet Pg. 251 11 '1■ 11 EAST JORDAN IRON WORKS LOCKING RING AND COVER PPERYIOUSF CONCRETE COLLAR/ 2 STNN.FS3 sm CAP scREws. r APPROVED WATER TIGHT PLUG (iYP) ` APPROVED WAR CONNECTION IPY' ;'vzr COMPACTED SELECT BACKFILL MATERIAL 7. 45, ELBOW cPEP HE WfE ^.• F:. — PLUG AND BLOCK WITHENDfP i1 OR OR CONTINUE PIPE w:•.x':.V.8' MIN UND:RWRSED SUBGRADE fir- —'COMPACTED BFODTNC 1 CLEANOUT (PEA GRAVEL) M,ATUM F-2.3 NOT TO SCALE 3' MAX TO LIMIT PERMEABLE ATE PEAMFABLE FlEID MATERIAL A: all - FIELD SUBGRADE V L . ca , n , ❑ , o . Q . ° i• _ _ IL� III —III I !I o 0 0 0 0 o n o v v o o PBRFGRAT® CGRRUCAttD a —1 I —I 1 POLYETHYLENE LATERAL I I ijl DRAIN TUBING SNAP GAP ALL ENDS OF 2" MIN •;�I I)�I I I�1 I �I I II PEIA G1fAVE1 � �I f Itt iI I =1 111.:4 I � I 1 III I II �� SUBGRADE / 2 1 SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE LATERAL COMPACTED F-2.3 NOT TO SCALE NYI-OPLAST 24" DRAIN BASIK 2824AG _ _X FRAME R GRATE TO MATCH BASIN INTECRATED DUCTILE10 D NIMMGM PIPE BURIAL DEPTH PER PIPE (3) VARIABLE INVERT HEIGHTS MANUFACTURER AVAILABLE (ACCORDING TO RECOMMENDATION PLANS/TAKE OFF) (MIN. MANUFACTURING AME AS MIN. RED. SSUMP) CORR. POLY TUBING VNOES IN LENGTH {• PERFORATED CORRUGATED (i) VWRKOUS TYPES OF INLET N OUTLET AfAW1ER4 AVAILABLE, POLYETHYLENE LATERAL DRAIN TUBING • R AL MAj -17/VC SNAP CAP •4 ." • ADS? SFNCIE WN3].HOPE FIP EWER ALL ENDS OF A?. o . - - , • _ - PVC DWV {ELL• SCH 40), PVC CDOO MS, CORRIIOATEO A RIBBED PVC PVC LATERAL TUBING .0 o' •4. • v - a•e PEA GRAVEL v • .� p •- WATERTIGHT JOIN •a'v • •4 .a • of 2• MIN (CORRUGATE,ED-HOPE • a tl 9- I 1 1 �SHOWN) S' NIN�—I I 1v ! 1— �--rrY•-' I {" INSIDE PIPE 6" MIN —I COMPACTED SUBGRADE 12• % 12• % 4' I III TEE _ 12• CPEP COLLECTOR FOR INVERT ELEVATIONS SEE DRAINAGE SHEET NATIVE WCKFlLL— SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE SIDE INLET CONNECTION NOT TO SCALE 15• MIN WIDTH CUDELINE .S GUIDELINE �iEIE RESIGNED CONCRETE SLAB DIMENSIONS ARE FOR �•�+ CUOEIiIIE PURPOSES ONLY. ACTUAL CONCRf7T SLAB MUST BE IBIS O - R GNED TANNIC INTO CONSIDERATION LOCAL SOIL CONDITIONS, 3O TRAFFIC LOADING, h OTHER APPLICABLE DESIGN FXFORS. PLANS SEE DRAWING NO. 7001-110-111 FOR NON TRAFFIC INSTALLATION. (3) VARIABLE SUMP DEPTH ACCORDING TO PLANS (B" MIN. BASED ON 4• MIN MANUFACTURING RED.) THE BACKFIL MATERIAL SHALL BE CRUSHED STONE OR OTHER GRANULAR MATERIAL MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF CLASS I, CLAM II. OR CLAIE MATERIEL AS DEFINED IN ASTM 02321. BEDDING h BACkFRJ. FOR SURFACE DIWNAOE INLETS SHALL BE PLACED R COMPACTED UNIFORMLY EV ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D2321. 1 _ COVER SHALL BE DUCTLE IRON PER AM A33B GRADE 7D-50-05. 2 LRAM SHALL BE DUCTILE IRON PER ASTM A5M GRADE 70-50-05 3 - DRAIN BASIN TO BE CIISTON MANUFACTURED ACCORDING TO PLAN DETAILS. RISERS ARE MEWED FOR BASINS OVER 84 DUE 70 SHIPPING RESTRICTIONS. SEE DRAWING NO, 7001-110-055. 4 - DRAINAGE CONNECTION STUB JOINT 14TOrM SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM D3212 FOR CORRLIQATED HOPE (ADS N-12/RANCCR DUAL WALL), N-12 HP k PVC sFwEFI. 5 - AOAMQ?S CAN BE MOUNTED ON ANY ANGLE O TO 350- TO DETERMINE MINIMUM ANGLE BETWEEN ADAPTERS SEE DRAWING NO. 7001-110-012. NYLOPLAST DRAIN BASIN NOT TO SCALE APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDMONDS OAT& BY: CITY ENGINEERING DMS- REVISION DATE 1111 LI 11' I15 SCiI((E)l. EDMONDS WOODWAY HIGH SCHOOL SYNTHETIC TURF CONVERSION `-.� � HOGAN sxu4Y/+.wxo"��Iw lu6asmn °its P.vll� ti DATE 5-4-2018 SCALE NTS DRAWN JCH CHECKED RSH p,A. DRAINAGE DETAILS SHEET F-2.3 a Packet Pg. 252 7.1.j STORMTECH SC-740 OR APPROVED EQUAL POLYtNYIENE (PE) CORRUDATED WALL STORAWATER COLLECTION CHAMBERS' EL ADS GEOSYNTHETIC 8D1T NON -WOVEN GEOTEXTILE ALL MOUND CLEAN. CRUSHED . ANGULAR STONE I 18 PEA GRAVEL-3/8' TO +' WASHED r INFILLED SYNTHETIC TURF 6' DRAINAGE LATERAL (IYP.) F-2.] 1' WASHED GRAVEL PER AASHTO M43 057 51 • B' RYH, tl-� a ?•Trx+ 1 T A;07ii�� L �! ADS aOIT NON -WOVEN CIEUTICIIIILE OR laffWIGATO WALL MON C APPROVED EQUAL UNDEROMN PIPE►�i ARx CAP L • / A w q STORMTECH CHAMBER RI BENEATH CHAMBER it • •�* a ,4 • •rNON_WOVEN GEOTEXTILE OR ADS APPROVED EQUAL GECSYNTHEncs, OR SECTIONGEOTEXTILE APPROVED EQUAL STORMTECH DETENTION CHAMBERS NOT TO SCALE PR FM STUBS AT BOTTOM OF END CAP FOR PART NUMBERS ENDING WITH'B• TOP MANIFOLD BOTTOM MANIFOLD PRE. FMB STUBS ATTOP OF END CAPFOR PART NUMBERS ENDING WITH "r CONNECTION CONNECTION PRE -CORED END CAPS END WITH 'PC' PAR" N =a A 6 I C SC749EPFA6(RSO146EyED41:5: P1:06D 7 74aEPE069PC 6' (150 mm) 10-8' (277 mm) IBS (4 mm) f - 13Ci....— BT+9Cl40EPFDRIPC B"(200 mm) 12,2'(3f0 mm) 1 '141 mmI - SC)4pEPElvT. Wf4DEFIE 1011'C 10• ( M mm) 13.4• (040 mm) m� - SG'7l0EPE108fgG14DEPE10BPC [I mnl 40FYE12Tl SCT40EPE 12TPC 1T IWO mm) 14.7'(373 mm) 1 mm) - SC7 E126l SC74TIEPEt71#`O - 12"(30mm) GCMOEPiT6T�PCT40EP♦=15TPC 15'(375mm) 18A'(467 mm) SCTI4EPE16B 75C740FYE159PC U' (33 mm) $0740EPE 4RY iSCT40EPE ISTFA2 16"(450 mm) 19.7"(500 mm) Xi mmr - SLTWEPEtUD18G 4DEPEIRIBPC $S TT6TPp7•AR' '.3"Fi mn) 1 Lax mm 9.1' Imo+.] imilili'lliTimill COVER ENTIRE ROW WITH AN GEOSYNTHETIC BOLT NON -WOVEN GEOTIXRE ALL STUBS, EXCEPT FOR THE SC74CEPE24B ARE PLACED AT BOTTOM OF END CAP SUCH THAT THE OUTSIDE DIAMETER OF THE STUB IS FLUSH WITH THE BOTTOM OF THE END CAP, FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION CONTACT STORMTECH AT 1ABBR192-2694 ' FOR THE SC740EPE24B THE 24- (600 mm) STUB LIES BELOW THE BOTTOM OF THE END CAP APPROXIMATELY 1.75' (44 mm BACKFILL MATERIAL SHOULD BE REMOVED FROM BELOW THE N-12 STUB SO THAT THE FF TLNG&T8tEVF1- STORMTECH SC-740 MANIFOLD DETAIL NOTE: ALL DIMENSIONS ARE NOMINAL NOT TO SCALE 6' PVC SDR-35 UNDERDRAIN PIPE 1 CHAMBERS SHALL BE STORMTECH SC-740, OR APPROVED EQUAL 2. CHAMBERS SHALL BE MANUFACTURED FROM VIRGIN POLYPROPYLENE OR POLYETHYLENE RESINS. 3. CHAMBER ROWS SHALL PROVIDE CONTINUOUS UNOBSTRUCTED INTERNAL SPACE WITH NO INTERNAL SUPPORT PANELS THAT WOULD IMPEDE FLOW OR LIMIT ACCESS FOR INSPECTION. 4. THE STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF THE CHAMBERS, THE STRUCTURAL MIL AID THE NSTALLATION FEQUIRENENTS SHALL ENSURE TTAY TAF LOAD FACTORS SPECIFIED IN THE M91CT0 LRFO BRIDGE DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS, SECTION 12,12. ARE MET FOR: I) LONG-OURATKxi WAD LOOS AND 7) SHORF-DURATION U'xF LOADS_ BASED ON THE AASHTO OESMN4 TRUCK WITH CONSDERAATN]N FOR IMPACT AND NN3PLE VD*CLE PIE9ENCES. 5. CwwBERS SHALL MELT ASTM F2922 (POLYETHYLENE) OR ASTM F2418 (PDLYPRGPIIF]E). VANOARO SPECIFICATION TOR THERMOPLASTIC COPRUUAREO WALL STORMWATER COLLECTION CHAMBERS'. B CHAMBERS SHILL BE DESIGNED AND ALLOWABLE LOADS DETERMINED N ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM F2787, STANDARD PRACTICE FOR STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF THERMOPLASTIC CORRUGATED WALL STORMWATER COLLECTION CHAMBERS'. 7. ONLY CHAMBERS THAT ARE APPROVED BY THE SITE DESIGN ENGINEER WILL BE ALLOWED. THE CHAMBER MANUFACTURER SHALL SUBMIT THE FOLLOWING UPON REQUEST TO THE SITE DESIGN ENGINEER FOR APPROVAL BEFORE DELIVERING CHAMBERS TO THE PROJECT SITE: a. A STRUCTURAL EVALUATION SEALED BY A REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER THAT DEMONSTRATES THAT THE SAFETY FACTORS ARE GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO 1.95 FOR DEAD LOAD AND 1.75 FOR LIVE LOAD, THE MINIMUM REQUIRED BY ASTM F2787 AND BY AA.SHTO FOR THERMOPLASTIC PIPE b A STRUCTURAL EVALUATION SEALED BY A REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER THAT MET. THE 50 MUST c STRUCTURAL CROSS SECTION DEAL ON WHICH THE STRUCTURAL EVALUATION IS WED, 8 CHAMBERS AND ETD CAPS SHALL BE PRODUCED AT AN ISO SMI CERTIFIED MANUFACTURING FACILITY. 9. STURMTECH SC-740 CHAMBERS SHALL NOT BE INSTALLED UNTIL THE MANUFACTURER'S REPRESEXTATME HAS COMPLETED A PRE -CONSTRUCTION MEETING WITH THE INSTALLERS, 10. STORMTECH SC-740 CHAMBERS SHALL BE INSTPL ED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 'STORMTECH SC-740 CONSTRUCTION GUIDE7. 11. CHAMBERS ARE NOT TO BE BACKFILLED WITH A DOZER OR AN EXCAVATOR SRUATED OVER THE CHAMBERS. STORMTECH RECOMMENDS 3 BACKFILL METHODS: STONESHOOTER LOCATED OFF THE CHAMBER BED BACKFILL AS ROWS ARE BUILT USING AN EXCAVATOR ON THE FOUNDATION STONE OR SUBGRADE BACKFILL FROM OUTSIDE THE EXCAVATION USING A LONG BOOM HOE OR EXCAVATOR. 12 THE FOUNDATION STONE SMALL BE LEVELED AND COMPACTED PRIOR TO PLACING CHAMBERS. 13. JOINTS BETWEEN CHAMBERS SHALL BE PROPERLY SEATED PRIOR TO PLACING STONE. 14. MAONTAN MINIMUM - 6' (150 mm) SPACING BETWEEN THE CHAMBER ROWS. 13. EMBEDMENT STONE SURROUNDING CHAMBERS MUST BE WSDOT PERMEABLE BALLAST AS APPROVED Ia. THE CI')fiIAAL'[CR NUSi REPORT ALA' GSCPEPANCIES WITH CILRNBER iTA1NOATI0N /ir9ER1ALS DEARINC CAPACITIES TO THE SITE DESIGN ENGINEER. PROTECT THE SYSTEM MNSTALLATION FROM SEDIMENT LADEN INPUTS THROUGHOUT THE NSTAlAT04 AND TO FINAL ACGEPIANCE. 1B. STORMTEQI SC-740 CHAMBERS SHALL BE INSTALLED N ACCORDANCE WITH THE 'STORWTECH SC-740 CONSTRUCTION CUIDE'. 19. THE USE OF CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT OYERR SC-740 CHAMBERS B LIMITED: NO EQUIPMENT IS ALLOWED ON BARE CHAMBERS. NO RUBBER TIRED LOADERS, DUMP TRUCKS, OR EXCAVATORS ARE ALLOWED UNTIL PROPER FILL DEPTHS ARE REACHED N ACCORDANCE WITH THE 'STORMTECH SC-740 CONSTRUCTION GUIDE'. WEIGHT LIMITS FOR CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT CM BE FOUND IN THE 'STORMTECH SSC-740 CONSTRUCTION GUIDE'. 20- FULL 36' NOD Ivm) OF STAIUZED COVER MATETXWS OVER THE COMET S IS REWIRED FOR DUMP TRUCK TRAVEL OR DUMPING. VERIFY WITH THE ENGINEERPRIOR TO INTRCOUCING CONSRCUTION TRAFFIC OVER THE WORK IN PROGRESS. ,RITE .Mp.x):F:1-x(I.dEWF7!•d11 1 21 THE EXPECTED SEMCE PERFORMANCE OF THE STORMTECH SC-740 ANO SC-310 CHAMBFJLR USING ASTN F2787 AND MSHTO LRFD PROCEDURES FOR OVAL'/' STRUCTURAL CAPACITY, AND LOAD AND P-EJ5TwCIE FACTORS ANACYSIS'KERE CONDUCTED USING CHAMFER GEOMETRY FROM THE STORMTECH SOLID COMPUTER GEOMETRIES CONFIRMED BY CHAMBER MEASUREMENTS AFTER MANUFACTURE EVALUATION CONSISTED OF FINITE ELEMENT CONPUIER MODELING OF CKAM$E7R PERFORMANCE AT DEPTHS OF FILL WTWE NI TS AND SIB INCHES, AND FIELD TEST WITH 0EY113S OF FILL BETWEEN 6 AND 138 INCHES. TINE -DEPENDENT MATERIAL PROPERDES FOR THE POLYPROPYLENE CHAMBERS WERE BASED ON TESTS PERFORMED ON SPECIMENS FROM ACTUAL CHAMBERS. 22. THEIR ANALYSES AND CALCULATION DEMONSTRATE THAT THE FACTOR OF SAFETY IS EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN 1.95 FOR DEAD LOAD AND 1.75 FOR WE LOAD, THE MINIMUM VALUES REWIRED BY ASTM F2)87 AND BY AASHTD FOR THERNOPASTIC PPE, WHEN INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE STORMTECH 5C-310/SC-740/OC-7bR OESKiN MANUAL AT GEPTlg OF FILL fOEiwEE)N 18 AND 96 INCHES AND SUBJECTED TO LIVE LOADS OF DESIGN TRUCK OHS-20) MAGNITUDE OR LESS. 1RCLUIY..NG A1,LOWMCES FOR IMPACT ARD MULTIPLE PRESENCE IT IS SUGGESTED THAT THE MINIMUM DEPTH OF FILL BE INCREASED TO 24 INCHES FOR UNPAVED INSTALLATIONS, WHERE RUTTING MIGHT REDUCE THE DEPTH OF FILL OVER TIME.' USE OF A DOZER TO PUSH EMBEDMENT STONE BETWEEN THE ROWS OF CHAMBERS MAY CAUSE DAMAGE TO THE CKWEERS AND IS NOT AN ACCEPTABLE BACKFILL METHOD ANY CHAMBERS DAMAGED BY THE 'DUNP AND PUSH' METHOD ARE NOT COVERED UNDER THE STORMTECH STANDARD WARRANTY. CONTACT STORMTECH AT 1-666-692-2694 WITH ANY QUESTIONS ON INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS OR WEIGHT UMTTS FOR CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDMONDS DATE: BY: r, REVISION DATI EDMONDS if �INICT EDMONDS WOODWAY HIGH SCHOOL SYNTHETIC TURF CONVERSION rl-rl HOGAN se.iikw�nnnm seiw x ixo6xssww DATE 5-4-2M6 SCALE NITS DMWN )OM CHECKED RSH DETENTION DETAILS SHEET F-2.4 a Packet Pg. 253 CATCH BASIN #3 FIELD FLOW CONTROL STRUCTURE CATCH BASIN #12 STORMTECH FLOW CONTROL STRLJCTURE 12' WTLET at PIPE 2' MCLEARANCE TO ANY IN PORTION OF THE FLOW CONTROL TEE 2' MIN CLEARANCE TO ANY PORTION OF THE F. PLAN VIEW CONTROL TEE FRAME, GRATE, * SOLD COVER MARKED 'DRAIN' WITH LOCKING BOLTS FRAME. CRATE & SOLID COVER MARKED 'DRAIN* WITH LOCKING BOLTS V MIN UNDER OEM 416AO FINISHED MADE I- UNDER "N=a CRAXj 5, MIN. Y MAX *S EL 416M PIPE SWIPCIVS 6' MIN. MAXVrS El. 112-0-ID PWCNIDE At AT LEAST ONE Y x 0.090* ALUMINUM SUPPORT 1110"Er ANCHORED To CONCRETE WALL W1 STAINLESS PIPE SUPPORTS - 't F19MAROLLM NOTCH WEIR BOLTS (MAX X SPACING) C PROVIDE AT AT LEAST ONE 3' 0 090' 411M ALUMINUM suppoRY BRACKET ANCHORED WIDTH 0.25* HANDHOLDS, STEPS, OR -------------------- TO CONCRETE WALL Wl 5/8- STAINLESS LADDER BOLTS (MAX 3- SPACING) 12' INLET PIPE 12' INLET PIPE V MAX 12* OUTLET PIPE 12' WATER TIGHT SHEAR GATE WITH ---------- CONTROL ROD roR CLEANOUT/DRAIN HANDHOLDS,, STEPS, OR F7. � 12' OUTLET PIPE LADDER ; 12's SLEEVE - a' MAX LENGTH an OUTLET PIPE 4 v , W/ TAPER FlT TO INSIDE DIAMETER 01 OUTLET PIPE 12" WATERTIGHT SHEAR CATS WITH :34 1 12*6 SLEEVE - a MAII LEW.1" CONTROL R9 FOR CLEANOUT/DRAIN 055'0 RESTRICTOR ORIFICE IN . PLATE BOLTED TO FLANGE. OR TAPERINSIDE = I FTT to DRILLED CAP OUTLET PIPE 0.78*0 RESTRICTOR ORIFICE IN PLATE BOLTED To FLANGE, OR CATCH SISK TYPE CATCH BASIN TYPE r DRILLED CAP. 2-45- IN/ SOLID COVER D% 2 2-48- W/ SOUD VMYCR TYPE 2 Le- NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE G._ FLOW CONTROL CINCH ANCHOR CMP RISER PIPE STRUCTURE SHR.W GROUT WIRE ROPE (STAINLESS STEEL) CONTROL DEVICE ASSEMBLY TO BE PK PIK $Tm /m owPL DEFORMED 1/8- MAOWW FROM • STEEL Roo (STAINLEST, INSIDE THE FCS -Jr- 7 STEEL OR ALLUMM) TEE I II II I LENGTH 70 FIT JL --- ET (TYP) ADAPTER IN DOUBLE PIPE AND GASKET ANO ADHESIVE BONDED SAND FINISH ON EXTERIOR. MIN 7' LONG FLOW CONTROL 0 SPACE BETWE N STRUCTURE PVC ADAPTER AND PIPE STUB rMiLfflofiT pgfeoM AND OMYROL DINIM FLOW CONTROL NOT TO SCALE PEND'NG r2� POINT OF CONNECTION -SCHEMATIC �25 NOT TO SCALE APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDMONDS DATE: BY: _br�� DATE 1A)MONDS EDMONDS WOODWAY HIGH SCHOOL SYNTHETIC TURF CONVERSION DAHOGAN ,, p. 4, Erol L AR DATE 5- 2018 SCALE NTS DRAWN NCH CHECKED R544 .,-. C) WE DRAINAGE & IRRIGATION DETAILS SHEET F-2.5 I Packet Pg. 254 k 24• j® �, ^ ® T2-375• I I Q1 MODEL M BE DETERMINED � I 0 3' POWER CONDUIT. SIZF_ TIE, DEPTH III I. CODE GGC'ND //. 2w :OMU..-. GUIDERJuSSGEWPER NO P Ix�r ASSC I OO PEDESTAL A BASE CONCRETE ill E `=24 37• I FINISH GRADE OB CONDUR FOR CONTROL WIRES I Q V.SI STN LESSaTTFS Ef.'CCILQ-LRE WTTHIN 1 +0 I IBB-24SS, WITH PED-24SS PEDESTAL L J NOTE: MOUNTCABINET 70 EXTERIOR OF LIGHTING PEDESTAL - IRRIGATION CONTROLLER -CABINET NOT TO SCALE ZONE SAID HINGED LOCKING COVER WITH ADJUSTABLE FRAME I d q 8 4 OO °O O Q� d d Q GROLIT ALL PENETRATIONS a d d 10' 4 o a a d d d a 5E� �.SiN_.A — A, THROUGH VAULT REMOTE CONTROL VALVE MANIFOLD NOT TO SCALE SET TO FINISH GRACE ////Fij(GRADON 4 PRE -CAST CONCRETE VAULT 17' I UDCKING 'TEE' COVER, BLACK, LIBELED 'IRRIGATION' MOMS, FINGRADE 1/2• GRADE ISHED 10 AUTOMATIC SOLENOID VALVE Q PPE -GIST CONCRETE Ws K UNDER EACH CORNER OF THE VALVE BOX I' WATERTIGHT WIRE (5) 4 OZ/SY NON -WOVEN GEOTEXTILE SPLICES (TYP.) $CH. BD PLC •..,.I,.,, - GW90N 1419-12 JUMBO 40 B' DEPTH 5/8' WASHED PEA GRAVEL BALL VALVE W/I.EtlL914 VALVE BOX OR EQUAL Q5 36' LOOP, EACH WIRE RUN 1 © 12' SON, BO PVC NIPPLE L SPRINKLE" s aWML WIRE CABLE----- } Q 5CH.40 MAINLINE (TYP.) AUTOMATIC CONTROL VALVE NOT TO SCALE MIN. 30' SH PLASTIC VALVE BOX BLACK, W/TEE-COVER 12' IROLIND PLASRC VALVE BOII LANDSCAPE CO I CONDITIONS _ DESCRIBED _ 3 ' ELSEWHERE 3 9.75' PVC I II MAINLINE �R _FLOW— _FLOW— N4ffS: 0 MISTER VALVE (D SET ALL PLASTIC VALVE BOXES ON PRECAST CONCRETE BA" ON FIRE! SUSORADE, BRICK Q FLOW SENSOR TO BE MIN. (4) 4'x4'x8' SO PROVIDE COMNUHIICAYIDN 0 PROVIDE NON-WGYEH 40E, OI)MX11LE AND 9• CAME AHD WLTACC WRRE MIN. DEPTH OF PEA COME- BELOW ALL VALVES. 14 GAUGE, ALLOW A 24' COIL TYPICAL AT EACH SPLICE OB STACK APPROVED PLASTIC VALVE BWa3 it L FOR WVNfENANCE: T HALF O OVERLAP BOXES AT HALF OR MORE. OVERLAP BORE MASTER VALVE & FLOW SENSOR F-2.6 NOT TO SCALE 2' SCH AC PVC TEE (TYP) SON BO PVC ELBOW SON AC PVC NIPPLE S' SO" 40 ELBOW FROM SUPPLY A A 2' SON SO PC J SUP UNION PREFORMED SON BO ME NIPPLE - REMOTE CONTROLVALVE 2' SGH SO PVC f SUP UN K1N 7�11 EFIaRMEDBAN SOPPLEZ'SCH B0 PE:-!I! 2' X 2 S' PVC PVC NIPPLE REDUCER BUSHNG PLUMB BOX PLAN ze• 9G TO NEAREST EXISTING SCH 40 ELBOW APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION SURFACE DRAIN LATERAL CITY OF EDMONDS DATE: BY: E h EDMONDS Is SCHODL D I S 1 X I t T EDMONDS WOODWAY HIGH SCHOOL SYNTHETIC TURF CONVERSION I 76r �_ A HOGAN 91'p. [IAf! SNiLlM1 SCALE NTS DRAWN ICH CHECKED FISH �,plo IRRIGATION & WASHWATER DETAILS SHEET F-2.6 a Packet Pg. 255 INFN.LEO STHDIEIIG TURF _ 1.v . ..o 0 times: O BRA55 BAIT Y&vu- m%,.CEO INLET/OURET 15' SIZED PER THE DRAWINGS OR ASSOCIATED INLET -SIDE PIPE Q BRASS UNION - 03 BRASS NIPPLE 0 Y 1. b e . a O . e T ONEI"k THRUST BLOCK — TABLE MINIMUM I#i1RING AREA ACVYNST DN 501 Shc szE A ElC D E 4' 2DD T 1 f NONE N x - 3/4' 01A RODS FOR 10' SIZE & SMALLER 90' BEND TEE 2 - 1' DIA RODS LARGER THAN 10' SIZE r -� iB ADDITIONALBLOCKING MUST BE PROVIDED IF CAP 45' BEND 9' AIH _ CAKE VALVE IS AT END OF • LINE DURING TESTING. x E GATE VALVE 56ELBE80n�Ls+��LL IVEN IN. THE FOLLOWING TABLE ARLOADSE FOR IN 22 1/2' BEND 11 1/4' BEND HORIZONTAL THRUSTS WHEN THE DEPTH OF COVER OVER THE PIPE EXCEEDS 2 FEET. NOTES: ML SAFE BLARING Low 1. SOWE FEET OF CONCRETE THRUSTS - BLOCK AREA BASED ON LB PEA 50 R. SAFE BEARING LOAD OF 2000/(3000) POUNDS PER SQUARE FOOT. •MUCK, PEAT. ETC. 0 2. SOFT CLAY 1,000 AREAS MUST BE ADJUSTED FOR OTHER S1ZE PIPE, PRESSURES & SAND 2.000 SOIL CONDITIONS. SAND &GRAVEL 3.000 3. CONCRETE BLOCKING SHALL BE CAST IN PLACE & HAVE MINIMUM SAND & GRAVEL CEMENTED WITH CLAY 4,000 OF 1/4 SQUARE FOOT BEARING AGAINST THE FITTING. HARD SHALE IO.ODO 4. BLOCK SHALL BEAR AGAINST FITTINGS ONLY & SHALL BE CLEAR OF • IN MUCK OR PEAT, ALL THRUSTS SHALL JOINTS TO PERMIT TAKING UP OR DISMANTLING JOINT. BE RESTRAINED BY PILES OR RE RODS TO 5. SOLID FOUNDATIONS OR BY REMOVAL OF MUCK OOHRtACIOR SHALL INSTALL BLOCKING ADEQUATE TO WITHSTAND OR PEAT AND REPLACEMENT WITH BALLAST OF FULL TEST PRESSURE AS WELL AS TO CONTINUOUSLY WITHSTAND OPERATING PRESSURE UNDER ALL CONDITIONS OF SERVICE. SUFFICIENT STABRITY TO RESIST THRUST. CONCRETE BLOCKING NOT TO SCALE LANDSCAPE LOCKING TEE' COVER. GREEN. LABELED iRPoGAT10N' FINISHED GRADE � L.--- , 2. ON NOTES, B' 14G }42 1(D J0 9- BRASS CATE VALVE. THREADED VALVE aw INl£T/oLmET, S120 PER THE GRAWM OR EQUAL OR ASSOCIATED INLET -SAVE PIPE V • 7 _o © BRASS UNION o BRASS NIPPLE O • ' , O SCHEDULE 40- PVC BUSHING, SKT • ,,' PVC MIN. e' DEPTH 5/5' WASHED PEA GRAVEL P L OUT i MAWUHE (TYP) 5 BALL VALVE & BOX NOT TO SCALE APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDMONDS DATr: BY: urn mT M Y�wh Mi EDMONDS Is scl)(DL K-CT EDMONDS WOODWAY HIGH SCHOOL SYNTHETIC TURF CONVERSION - HOGAN P00kR4 A.1(4. In�� JI ,per 4�E1[P.014#- 'DAn 54-2018 SCALE NTS DNAWN TCH CHECKED !BIN er..rwr Qan swl.AHw..n IRRIGATION & WASHWATER DETAILS SHEET F-2.7 a Packet Pg. 256 TOP OF DPHRRLLH HP -I IV RE SET FLUSH WITH NATURAL TURF SPRINKLER RISER ASSEMBLY F_2.8 NOT TO SCALE TOP OF SPRINKLER HEAD TO GE SET FLUSH WITH FINISH GRADE IN SEEDED AREAS 10• ROOT ZONE SAND N PRE-MVWUFACILRE7 TRIPLE TOP SWING 40imr WITH RUBBER O-WNG SEALED THRFIOS PVC TEE OR ELL W/ +TIC U,PER< PIPE IS AS REWIRED AT NATURAL TURF ^ ELEVATION NOTES: 10 BRASS QUICK COUPLING VALVE © RUBBER CAP 0 GALVANIZED NIPPLE 04 /5 REBAR 36• DEPTH ® STAINLESS STEEL BAND WORM DRIVE CLAMP 0B PLASTIC VALVE BOX, MIN. 12'0 Q MIN 5' DEPTH 5/B' WASHED PEA GRAVEL (g) PAC -CAST CONCNETE DRICK UNDER EACH OCRMER OF THE VALVE BOX ® 30 MIL PVC LITER OR EQUAL.; TAPE TO VALVE BOX, CUT MINIMUM OPEMNO FOR PIPE. 10 4 OZ/SY NON -WREN GEoTDrnLE TOP OF SPRINKLER HEAD TO BE SET FLUSH WITH FINISH GRADE IN SEEDED AREAS IAA}LI i l�r lir I r PRE�AANUFACNRED TRIPLE L XN TH TOP SWING JOINT WITH RUBBER O-RING SEALED THREADS 4 PAC TEE OR ELL W/ BUSHING AS REQUIRED PVC LATERAL PIPE PVC TEE DR ELL W/ PLAN BUSHING AS REWIRED AT LANDSCAPE AREAS ELEVATION 1' FEMALE ACME A MALE ACME 90J / /31' FAPr A MICE ACME IIILEF LOCKING 'TEE" COVER, BLACK, LABELED `IRRIGATION' -CARSON 1410-12 JUMBO VALVE BOX OR EQUAL �'-® 12' MIN. COVER IMREAAII VR - VALVE BOX WITH REMOVABLE UO .- QUICK COWLING VALVE 2' TOP COURSE PERMEABLE AGGREGATE 1. INSTALL OLY PLUMB AN 12.2' RASE COURSE CENTERED IN VALVE 90 PMMEAB r AGGREGATE 2. SECURE QCV ASSEMBLY CONPALYED _ "WIPALDE TO STEEL PIPE W/ 2EA STAINLESS STEEL ClAA1F I J. USE APPROVED SEALANI LAY LENGTH ON ALL THREADS I l^- A'XS' BRASS NIPPLE 1' BRASS STREET 90 PRE -MANUFACTURED TRIPLE TOP SM1NG JOINT WITH 17C12' SCFi yr J' 1" OIA GALVANIZED PPE >, RUBBER 0-RING SEALED NEE go SECURE QC VALVE M PIPE + THREADS WITH 2 EA SS CLAMPS L' BRASS IT 90 $CH 40 MAINLINEPVC LATERAL AWN PIPE SCHEDULE 40 LIYL3• SCH lW NIP 1' BRASS IT 90 Pfff-MANUFACTURED TTOPLE TOP SWING JOUq WITH RUBBER 0-0INR SEALED THREADS v MIN. 12' WIDE TRENCH AWN PAVE164NT OR EATIING (OR AS FIF%IREO TO Ak7-GW ADEQUATE PAVEMENT PATCH PER 5PR V10. COMPACTOR OF B CKFILL) PLANS i SPECS (TIP.) iVLtnR GRADE INFI LED SYNTIETIC I FINISH GRADE TURF 1 11� DUSTINC up� ICPSOIL T Iu 4m 17' TYP CCTECC7A-7APE (BLUE) B'ABOVE PIPE. e Tw L7FIVE COMPACTED. SUITABLE - DETECT -A -TOPE (BLUE C RED) E OVER BE NATIVE BACKFlLL B' HBELOWPIP TOP OF TRENCH GRADE OVER EACH PIPE DR CONDUIT (TYP.) SCH 40 PVC MAIN LINE. BUNOLE CONTROLLER WIRES ,o uw rrucn ALL BACKFlLL SHALL BE MNFR& 24' MIN. LINE ON AODKIWE TAPE 2 (1 W MINAS CFO�= SCH.40 PrC SRdLIE 1'RTI / m ON IATFRAL LINES • COHIIOL VAM IN I STPERATE CONDUIT h/0R SLE'LVE (TYP,) iLl 1, �&VE 10 SIZE SHALL BE AT LEAST 2 TIMES GREATER THAN GO SUE OF THE PIPE. I, 2. WIRES SHALL BE IN SEPFRATE CONDUIT SLEEVE EXCEPT UNDER ROWS WITH HEAVY VEHICLE TRAFFIC. 3. SLEEVES SHALL BE RECURED UNDER ALL PAVED AREAS k WALL. OR FOOTNG PENETRATIONS. IRRIGATION SLEEVE TRENCHING UNDER PATHWAY OR SIDEWALK DETECT -A -TAPE (BLUE k RED) SHALL BE B• BELOW TOP OF TRENCH GRADE OVER EACH PIPE OR CONDUIT MP) SELIV nAn r?; j!ACRTILL SCHAD PVC SLEEVE WITH MAIN OR LITERAL UNES h CONTROL WIRES IN SEPERATE CONDUIT h/OR SLEEVE CM.) t�5F.E7vE ID SIZE SHALL BE AT LEAST 2 TIMES GREATER THAN OD SZE OF THE PIPE. 4• MMIN2. WIRES SHALL BE IN SEPARATE CONDUIT SLEEVE. 3. SLEEVES SHALL BE REQUIRED UNDER ALL PAVED AREAS, CtrFM ARD SYNYlEOC TURF. AND WHERE SPECIFICALLY SHOWN. 4, ALLOW FOR FLANGE SIZE ON ALL SLEEVES CARRYING HOPE PIPE. ! 5 TRENCHING FOR MAINLINE & LATERAL PIPE F_2,5'/ NOT TO SCALE _ UNDER MAIN OPPOSITE SIDE FROM SWING JOINTS (WHET SATERAL s MAIN 91ARE 11# TRENCH)- BUT 00 H07 TREE BO}fmm �jTy,TO AWN LIWC MAIN LINE TRENCH APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDMONDS DATE: BY: U11EM CWWM4 REVISION PATE I. P 11 LONDS if N1f TIE Act EDMONDS WOODWAY HIGH SCHOOL SYNTHETIC TURF CONVERSION �iHOGAN DATE 5-4-2018 SCALE NTS DRAWN UCH CHECKED US11 WPIIMTC)1.11 IRRIGATION & WASHWATER DETAILS SHEET F-2.8 Q Packet Pg. 257 Q CAST MAX $M%%OE I- ABOVE TOP RAIL@ POST W 4WD 2-W O.D. LINE POSTS (OR AS SPECIFIED) 1-5/0- 0. . TOP RAIL (TYP.) SET Z: St BOTTOM RAIL CA IST CAP (OR AS SPCCIFIED) Gi�'♦�i+♦+t°iZ'a1' itiTERMINAL OR CORNER POSTS a prae• ♦r♦ ♦ari0,06 SCH.40 STEEL PIPE 2' MESH. CHAIM UNIX FABRIC. CHAIN �MK FENCE TOP t?��♦°♦e+ar a«arty♦ ♦Oi+�ia,'♦ II , ��♦*'ra,♦Dii°�ay°s°+as+a♦ r►•♦+re-. a.•.r.a +s ls+'♦♦ a,• at•at «4,•'♦�r"i"G G!�II bra • , • + ♦s•♦♦ ea«a 's r♦%579 GA. (FOR GALVANIZED FENCES). FABRIC•� 4aC�I! ia�♦ ♦♦t ♦d• iaia�a4 r+ar•r r+ ♦••arrQi♦�♦�♦tyi*°♦♦aaa,+aaaaOrryt°i a• rt♦+♦♦TENSION GAR (TYP.) TENSION BAR AND MESH AS SPECIFIEDI r sirW TOP• ► WHERE SPECIR`E0 ♦ • ♦ ■ 1•♦ • ♦ ♦ tr,♦♦♦ ♦♦ I� TENSION wft 00. INTERMEDIATE RAIL 1--10 SPECkFIED « ai♦+v s � aa♦,t F►« a(WHERE APPLICABLE) at+� SURFACE AND FINISH'+p.�r♦'+♦i 1� ♦♦• r p• • i*s'«'i��b's'i' 4° °a°i❖i°*4�r'a+ lr�°4 ��a� ��VARIES BOTTOM RAILS 0 18 D.C. (TYP.) 6 M TIES ALONG TOP, INTERMEDIATE & - r*�i ♦rr'�t'rioii*i ♦rim+�'�. rt�lrt� I -C. @ FABRIC SELVAGEO ♦♦♦ • •CURB SUCK TO DRAAIN WH t+�♦, • r•-FIRM GRADE FOOTING DEPTH k 00 QtM IS SPECIFIED (SEE SCHEDULE' TAIL OF TIE AGAINST ! T 1 •S 1 il$ BOTTOM CZRCRETI[ FOOTING � IUNDER CURB FINISHED GRADE DEPTH A40 OtAkErEft Q FABRIC SPECIFIED IITT T 11 !!_ .CHAINLINK FENCING ELEVATION9 J NOT TO SCALE FENCING TYPE 40' HIGH BACKSTOP 10' HIGH WITH 10- HIGH WITH 30. WETTING 1V NETTING TO- HIGH FENCING 6' HIGH FENCING FOUL POST CORNEA POST PIPE 0 X-STRONG- PIPE B X-STRONG' PPE B X-STRONG• 2.575' OD 2.875' GD _- TERMINAL POST PIPE 0 X-STRONG- PIPE B K-5TIiON6` PPE B X-STRONG- 2.1375- OD 2.875' OD --- LINE POST 0.625' 00 B.625' GO 4.000' OD 2675' OD 2.375' OD --- FOOTING DEPTH 7'-6' 7'-G' a-0' 4B' 36' 6'-0' FDOTING DIAMETER 36' 35, 30' 12' 12' 12' TOP RAIL Hr. 40 10' 10'-_- INTERMEDIATE RAIL HTS. �S',f0',1 S',20',27',30',73' S' S' S• _--- ___ BOTTOM HAIL HIT 1' 1' 1' 1' 1• ___ TENSXN WIRE HTS. 2- 2' 2' 2' CHAINLINK SCHEDULE NOT TO SCALE SWINGING GATE 1 4' POST FULCRUM 2.1 TYPE LATCH CRAWL! K FENCE I (TYPCOHICREiE e FOOT110 J F-2.9 SUBGRADE 3 SINGLE SWING GATE F_2.9 NOT TO SCALE 9 iTw.m NINES- 1. ALL FENCING FABRIC SWILL BE NO. 9 GAUGE FINISHED STEEL WINES WITH BLACK VINYL COATING EXCEPT FOR DESIGNATE SECTIONS OF THE BACKSTOP FENCING WHICH SHALL INCLUDE NO. 6 GAUGE FINISHED STEEL WIRES WITH BLACK VINYL COATING. 2. ALL POSTS, RAILS. OWES, POST TOPS, STRETCHER BARS, BANDS. ETC SHALL BE PWNTEO $I.ACTC 3. TENSION WIRES AND WIRE TIES SHALL INCLUDE A BLACK VINYL COATING. 4. MAXIMUM POST SPACING: 10' ON CENTER. S. ALIGN POSTS SO THAT FENCE FABRIC IS INSTALLED IN A CONTINUOUS, STRAIGHT ONE REGARDLESS OF FENCE POST DIAMETER 6. FOR POSTS WITHIN 5' OF SLOPES GREATER THAN 3:1. ADDITIONAL FOOTING DEPTH MAY BE REQUIRED, COORDINATE WITH ARCHITECT FOR ADDITIONAL DIRECTION. 7. AT CONTRACTORS OPTION SPLICE POST PER DETAIL S F-2.9 • PIPE X-STRONG OR PIPE X-X-STRONG WHERE INDICATE ON THE PLAN SWINGING CATES W/ LOCKING FULCRUM LATCH 5 DOUBLE SWING GATE NOT TO SCALE 4' 0-O. POST CHAIN LINK FENCE 1 F-2.9 SEE FENCING SCHEDULE FOR FOOTING DEPTH T-2.9 I 5 POST SPLICE DETAIL F_2,g NOT TO SCALE FUN M FW THROUGH THE TAINt 3 WAL PER PLAN CONTINUOUS WALL ! REINFORCING PER J 13I-.ENTBARB AT3'OC SECTION DETAIL 6(F-2 10 EACH WAY, LOCATED AT THE TOP OF THE POST. FIRST TIE TO BE 3BELOW TAVALL. DIMENSIONS AS SHOWN 5 WALL REINFORCING AT FENCE POST F_29 NOT TO SCALE SWINOWD GATE IV HT. CKWKMK 4' O.D. POST F! 2 F-2.9 POST �.1 TYPE LATCH STRETCHER HOD BAR BAR E' IT. IM1K FE111LHCL TRAME (TrP. . , r FINISH L+d7•I �.. C' IT CURE SURFACE AND 4' BASE VANES - CONCRETE 2 FOOTIIC I SUBGRADE 7 SINGLE SWING GATE AT ELEV CURB F-2.9 NOT TO SCALE APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDMONDS DATE: BY: unE 1 REVISION GATT EDMONDS Is SCH®L 11111KICT EDMONDS WOODWAY HIGH SCHOOL SYNTHETIC TURF CONVERSION �µT S- HA y' C �,y syur.eTli+'� P DATE 54-10TA SCALE NTS DRAWN 104 CHECKED RSH O` u. FENCING DETAILS SHEET F-2.9 r+ Q Packet Pg. 258 TOP RAIL DOUBLE WHEEL OUTSIDE 00 ENCLOSURE TOP RAIL NOTES, �ef1r 1. INSTALL TERMINAL POST MIN. IOW O.C. ROUIMG LATE PIPE TRWX FENCE FABRIC ROLLING GAT--, ROVING CATE W/LOUKABFE LATCH r1-s/B• ID. TOP RAIL CNNN LINK ' B,ay7'A 4-0 FOUL F-Y.4 TpWWIL POST POIi/ TERMINAL IV MAX O.C. V (rw) POST - - - d--- -� "e ^ _- ^ -- ---- 1RU55 15'OOTIiJIT]y_ a �-- Rom- - -- --- RODS a INSTALL CAPS OR . lT'FP.j " • " • + PLUGS AT ALL O ANL ENDS UREI WA" 2.875Y LINE CORNER POST .^•'t%) POSE XTYP) Z1QIE; VERIFY ALL FENCE POST SIZES PER PLAN B: SCHEDULE I-S/8• A/C PAVING Ir;?R AGGREGATE SINGLE ROLLING GATE 4 TYPICAL FENCE POST LAYOUT NOT TO SCALE F-2.10 NOT TO SCALE OU151DE OF ENCLOSURE DOUBLE WHEEL OUTSIDE OF ENCLOSURE TOP PAL t� `ROVING GATE PIPE TRUCK ROLLING CATE ROLLING CATS W/LOCXALE LATCH 1-5/8' I.D. TOP RAIL �CNIWI LINK FENCE A _e A iq 1 III \ TI � � 1� � ir' IJ DOUBLE ROLLING GATE I NOT TO SCALE B' 1 ' e PER1AOi:S I I n A P� • II I • 7 I e1 I lili��ii i I DISTURBED SUBCRADE TOCOMCT 95X MIN I=ITTi- ; 4' DEPIH BASE Ar,CREGATE-/ 'LJ OCPTIK eDim OUR! FTNHSN GRADE SHAD IIIE EOLIA. TO OR GREATER THAN CONCRETE RETAINING CURB EXP6SED PURTION NOT TO SCALE N FENCINGG FE f z5 18' MAX CURB HEIGHT 04 — 2COFYTRNOUS TENNIS COURT SURFACING, SYNTHETIC TURF, TED SYNTHETIC TURF, LANDSCAPING, � OR IXISfING ASPHALT PAVING UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE 5 OR PLUGS ENDS CHAIN LINK FENCE CATE POST 3' MAX STA!iDIHEI GATE EATCH GATE LATCH J4 �� ~•�.SM M911M£11l�IfrF.fis llBw 1 1 1 �■�V.i +ice I 6 o 7. 11] NOT TO SCALE E FRAME OGKING ULCRUM ATCH CHAIN LINK FENCE GATE POST 2 W.1 W25 DIAMETER LEVER WELDED TO LATCH H:30'-42' 0 ACTUAL RETAINING HEIGHT OF THE WAIL WILL VARY FROM 1'-6- TO 4'-6' MAX. ® ACTUAL WALL HEgTT ABOVE GRADE © ACTUAL WALL HEIGHT PLUS MINIMUM 12' TO TOP OF FOOTING, AND TOTAL WIDTH OF FOONNG DQ REINFORCING STEEL TO BE /4 DEFORMED BAR SPACE BARS A4 NOTED © BACKPLL WITH CLEAN FREE DRAINING GRANULAR MATERIAL A MINIMUM OF 12' BEHIND WALL Q PROVIDE 2' PVC WEEP HOLES TO GRADE B' O.C. G. ALL EXPOSED FACES SHALL HAVE A CLEAN, UNIFORM FINISH FREE FROM VOIDS, FINS. EXCESS MATERIAL, FORM TEXTURE, OR TIE HMO. FILL ALL VOIDS AND PROVIDE A SMOOTH SACKED FINISH. H. PROVIDE A 3/4' CHAMFER AT ALL EPOSED CORNERS AND EDGES. (D ALL WORK CONSTRUCTED ON FIRM UNYIELDING SUBGRAIE / 95X MODIFIED PROCTOR. Q REFER TO CHNNUNK FEND SCHEDULE FOR I'057 FOUNDATION iGEOU•REUENG5. EXTEND FENCE POST FOUNDATION BELOW WALL TDOTINO AS :R)2AIED ON THE SCHEDUt Q SURFACE •• A"CRnnlCT TURF sSHHG LAHOSeIEO AREA eF-z.l eF-2.1 F-2.1 L REFER TO RETAINING WALL CONTROL JOINTS DETAIL BEFORE CONSTRUCTION. Q Y PAD ® FENCE POST FOUNDATION. TOP OF FENCE POST FOUNDATION STARTS AT BOTTOM OF CONCRETE WALL FOOTXMc APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDMONDS DATE: BY: urrel AemrD DA eIr:R REVISION DATE EDMONDS 16 SCHUDII. Ir I. T a.l I EDMONDS WOODWAY HIGH SCHOOL SYNTHETIC TURF CONVERSION DA HOGAN YY Y v lbb '�A w Q EA P.OIi P R DATE 5<-2013 SCALE NTS DRAWN GCH CHECKED 11Rr FENCING DETAILS SHEET F-2.10 Q Packet Pg. 259 7.1.j END POST AND LINE POST SIZE PER SCHIEDWE ��rrLLrrrrs.�rll-� SECURE NETTING ON FOUL SIX OF FENCE CAP k 10' Iif. CHAINUNK FENCING KETTINC POSTS 20'-0' 1/2 ON-CHfER DIBTANCE (1B' MAX NET DOLE SAG] SEE TOP CORNER CABLE M SICCING 1NSfT O SEE TOP EDGE SLIPPORF INSET(g) ' 1 I SAG12'MA7( N. IB1/A {��il SAG AT CENTER OF GABLE E INIERNEDLATE NET PPORT INSET. INSTALL O a.c VOMMIL p I ,. FENCE CAP HOT SHOWN SALL . CONTROL FOR CLARITY I F - _NETTING SEE0 ALL FABRIC SELVAGE CONNECTION` TO BE KNUCKLED ruim FENCE LINE POST, BLACK B GAUGE K2' MESH CHAIN UNK g TOP CORNER CABLE & RIGGING NOT to SCAI_E � y � Ilia �--4 •• EDGE SUPPORT NOT To '�Cmx A BALL CONTROL NETTING ASSEMBLY D VERTICAL EDGE SUPPORT NOT ro SCAIE CONNECTION NOTES: HARDWARE NOTES: EYE BOLT LOCATED NEAR TOP OF POLE ASSEMBLY. PLACEMENT TO ACCOUNT FOR POTENTIAL OF UP TO 1S' OF SAO IN THE TOP SLPPOKBL F CAE AT 70LW VISION WITH THE NEITNO FI PLACE MAX SPACING BEDW HORIZONTAL CABLE ENDS 12XF ® GALVANIZED DR STAINLESS SRD:L TNNEA= NASTER UNK QVWDNER OR APPROVED EQUAL 1/2' MI-I.j' PROVIDE H RMONTAL HAMNARE WITH APPROVED BLACC FINISH. ® GALVANIZED STEEL THIMBLE SIZED FOR THE SPECIFIED MIRE ROPE: USE AT ALL CABLE TEIRMiNAT1DNS. ® GALVANIZED STEEL WIRE ROPE, 5/10"/ ® MIRE ROPE CONNECTOR, U-BOLT TYPE MIN. TWO PER CONNECTION OR AS NEEDED. 0 VINYL TAPE TRIPLE WRAP ALL CUT WIRE ENDS. ® PRE-FABRIFATEU BALL CONTROL NET AS`~YBLY TO BE PROVIDED WITH A CMTINU:hF 5/D 'A HYLOH ROPE E9!M:]F7 ® BUCK VINYL OR POLYESTER SNAP -CUP FOR VERTICAL CABLE -TO -ROPE CONNECTIONS ONLY OI GALVANIZED OR STAINLESS STEEL TURNBUCKLE, 1/2 ' A 12'. 1D TOP COWJR,- EYE BOLT SIZED TO ACCOMMDMTE BOTH THE UMTT ON OAP BETWEEN THE POLE AND THE VZROGL CABLE AND THE CONNECTING LINKS FOR BOTH THE VERTICAL AND H=ZON AL SUPPORT CABLES PROVIDE (1) TURNBUCKLE AT EACH END OF EACH CABLE TOP DICE OF Litt CONIROL NET ASSEMBLY MELD TO THE SUPPORT CABLE MISFI CAI.VYOZFD OR STAINLESS STEELCR ALUMINUM T7C�ALfD LINK SNAP UNK, OR CKLIBWER�-TYPE CONNECTOR WIN BUCK FINISH. SIZE TO ALLOW 9PACLNG NO LM THAN 12" D.C. BUT NO GREATER THAN 21' O.C- TO REDUCE ROPE BORDER SAG BETWEEN CONNECTIONS. Q LOOSE VERTICAL CONNECTIONS TO BE WA BLACK VINYL OR POLYESTER SNM-CUP SPACED 12'-18' O.C. O4 BOTTOM VERTICAL SUPPORT GABLE CONNECTION TO INCLUDE A TURNBUCKLE FOR ADJUSTMENT Q RILL CONTN0. NET ASSEMBLY BOTTOM EDCE 0OHNECMN TO BE VIA MLON 21P TIE F2'-19' O-C. DRECTLY TO CNARt LINK FADW BELOW THE TOP RAAL CV FABRIC TO LE INSTALLED ON THE F1FlO SIDE OF THE FRAMMRK RILL CONTROL NET TO BE SECURED TO THE FIELD 1D E OF THE AhISNED (>WN LINK FENCE ASSEMBLY BELOW THE TOP RAIL ® MAIN VERTICAL SUPPORT CABLE CONNECTION TO POLE. 7 VERTICAL CABLE SUPPORTS SHALL BE ON EACH SIDE OF NEITNO SUPPORT POSTS. B NETTING SHALL BE SECURED TO TOP RAIL/FENCE CAP SO THAT THE FENCE CAP SHALL BE IN PLAY. FFNLING & NFTTING D"TAII. NOT TO SCALE CONNECTION Q CHAIN LINK FENCE MIOT TO SCALE INTERMEDIATE NET SUPPORT G Nm TD 9GLi E APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDMONDS BY: REVISION EDMONDS Is SCH®L EDMONDS WOODWAY HIGH SCHOOL SYNTHETIC TURF CONVERSION �)A HOGAN DATE 5-4-2018 SCALE NTS DRAWN ICH CHECKED AM, NETTING & FENCING DETAIL SHEET F-2.11 a Packet Pg. 260 7.1.j C ~ 0.5' 4S 1� 7IIE PU1411C EDGE ANCHOR MAY BE TE711'ORAkLY SET MTB1 POWER -LOADS PUF.iO AT hE CONSRACfORB OPTION TO ASSIST IN 12 OR 15' TOOLED EDG� CHAMFER CSTABLMSHOD THE PROPER LINE AND GRADE THE TEMPORARY i1ARDV&NtC MAY RE�" Ai76R i1I:AL N$TNLATION. ') 2. THE CONIRACW MAY CHOOSE TO UTILIZE SITXL POWER -LOAD DRIVEN OR RYA -SET CCHCRETE ANCHOR NAILS, MINIMUM STANK 2.5' CLR 1 DIAMETETN 5/32', MINIMUM HEAD/WASHER DIAMETER 3/O', SUFFICIENT LENM TO WSVK A MINIMUM 2' EMBEDMENT. N-DUAL ALTERNATEM O ANCHORS SHALL DEVELOP A MINIMUM 45OLS SHEAR, 350LB TENSION N 4D0DPSI CONCRETE AT 2' EMBFDHEIM A ` • ' . EXPANSION JOINT ' . n 3. ONCE INITIAL LINE AND GRADE HAS BEEN ESTABLISHER INSTALL THE SPEOF O RAM -SET OR POAER-4.W DRIVEN CONCRETE L AND WEAIUNED ANCHORING NAILS IN MANNTA CONSFSIERT WITH THE APPROVF� MA`AfACnAWIIS PRJNTED 1NSiRUCT10N AND THE SPECIFIED SPACING. O • w + PLAN/CONTROL a • ypj. 2.5' !4 RE9AA JOINT AT EACH M. CONTINUOOS POST CONCRETE . . 4. WEDGE ANCHOR TO BE SET AT MIDDLE SOX OF EACH BOARD. 30' O.C. MAX., 4-B' FROM ENDS. Ns PAVING JOINTS TO ' ° O P� VIEW AICN WITH q OF ^-0 5. MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR CONCRETE ANCHOR NaL INSTALLATION DEPTH OF EMBEDMENT: 2' OR AS RECOMMENDED BY 7FIE ANCHOR FENCE PAS a p SUPPLIER, WHICHEVER IS GREATER. HORIZONTAL SPACING: NO GREATER THAN 21' ON CENTER AND 6' FROM ETD OF ANY LENGTH OF • • IP OR 15' WHERE INCLUDED. h LUMBER. STAGGER THE SPACING OF EACH ANCHOR UP AND DOWN WITHIN THE MIDDLE ONE-HALF THE FACE OF THE RECYCLED EDGE 1 O 0.5' 45' CHWAFER ANCHOR. - 21' - 21' 21' -I` _ B• PIT 26K �) �- 0,) EDP) I - IT _ £ MIDDLE 04RMARM)" FIBER IN I. l.. t____ CONONUOl15 FIBER BOARD O ALL I _ - - LOCATIONS, FULL DEPTH @SECTION LOCATE (2) CONTINUOUS LOCATNESPDST Q SYNTHETIC TURF EDGE ANCHOR LOB z51T04 BAR WITHIN THENOT TO SCALE BOTTOM 30% GF THE ©D.EVATION CONTAFNMENT CURB CURB MASS PROVIDE ADEQUATE COVER FENCE(e FENCE F-2.5 0.5' 4S CHAMFER SS' 25CLR KEYED IN AT SYNTHETICEYED TURF L PERIMETER L TOOLED EDGE ' T' ca ) I �4 RF WA . -J LDE (y) OAZODS GO • COHDNUOUS BAR (E)PLAN VIEW A WITHIN THE • 307E OF THE CURB 12',13' OR 23 a .I MASS PAOME FENCE POST R A A AOEOUATE COVER 0.5' 4F CHAMFER QE a h " •1 b 1 CONTINLKXJS CONE IrJFI, S �,� 1+ FENCE POST FOOTING a FIBER IMPRALL ° • U)0 CONTINUOUS FULL O ALL. EFENCE S, SECTION FULL DEPTH O FENCE POST LOCATIONS ©' 1 CONCRETE CURB & EXPANSION JOINT NOT TO SCALE INFlLL MATERIAL TO BE FLUSH WITH TOP OF CONCRETE CURB NOTCH CONCRETE TO EXTEND TURF TO FACE OF FENCE POST. ADHERE TURF BACKING TO CONCRETE SURFACE INFILLD SYNTHETIC STAPLE AS MOOREO- �TUYd (TYP•) N ANCHOR 7URF L r-2.1 I o➢., aC7 en SYNTHETIC TURF' EDGE ANCHOR -2-H 20 RECYCLi1� Li PLASM TIMBER N LENONS AS REIXIBIED. Sf' w RECYCLED PLASTIC TIMBER TD CONDME EDGE 'ACTH APPROVED RA,= NYL. (SPACE 21' MAX ON CENTO EDGE ANCHOR AT CONCRETE CURB NOT TO SCALE CHAINLINK FENCE POST CONCRETE CURB !0 1, FLAG: IN OUT OF 1-1/2- X 11GA, MILD STEEL FAR FOUL PLAY PLAY A36 FLATTENED [N PEA TERRIHTHY EXPANDED SHEET NOTE: OUTFIELD PAINT BANDS YELLOW FENCING T MN "- TO MATCH FOUL POLE LINE POST FENCE FABRIC WITH TERMINATE SITE OBSCURING FABRIC AT FOUL SITE OBSCURING FABRIC EACH SIDE OF FOUL RE CONCRETE CURB POLE SO THAT POLE FOUL POLE VISIBLE INTEAGATED AS TERMINAL POST FAIR r FOUL POLE FOOTING 25' YN. fOVL POLE PANTED 5 4. OD -YELLOW PLAN VIEW Sp40 OALVAN4ED -Z•t FOUL 2'-4' CLEM OF TOP RAIL eOUTFIELD SIGN 21 INSTALL FOUL POLE AR A TERMINAL POST IN OUTFIELD FENCE ^FENCE RAIL WTM CAP ¢:DTI TNFORDUM . ��O 1 ET 2.1 F-2.9 7FINISHED SLEBOE FLUSH WITH T.P OF CONCRETE CURB GRADE SURFACE VARIES • FENCE LINE CURB 7 ii cRODND- SLEEVE _� • •. 24' OUA 5' DEEP •�. CONCRETE FOOTING 5 FOUL POLE ELEVATION CONCRETE CURB TO BE FLUSH F 12 NOT TO SCALE WITH ADJACENT SURFACE ADJACENT SURFACE MAY VARY 81 � .Iha I I (2) %4 CONTINUOUS IS ^ FENCE POST FOOIINO A' fl .Q "' N07F• . F I: ALTERNATE TOOLED JOINTS AND EXPANSION ii JOINTS 10' O.C. I� n � •° no- O PJA�.DS n f 7 TERMINATE FENCE CAP AT TERMINAL POSTS. CAP TO BE CONTINOUS AT 10' HEIGHT POST 4' DIAMETER POLYURETHANE SLIT PIPE FENCE CAP (COLOR TBD) SECURE WITH CABLE TIES 3' O.C. I��TTi �- ! Y FENCE CAPP TOP RAIL AT OUTFIELD FENCE 15 GAUGE ALUMINUM 4-YEAR VINYL BACKGROUND k GRAPHICS OUTFIELD HOG RING SIGN PERIMETER TO IXTTFIEL0 FENCNG 24' MIN FENCE FABRIC METAL SIGN WITH GREEN BACKGROUND AND 12' MIN. WHITE NUMBERS. OUFIELD SIGNS NOT TO SCALE 18' MIN LEFT FIELD F5 4 LINE 316 CENTER FIELD 3135 RIGHT FIELD FOUL LINE 315' INSTALL FENCE CAP AT AL I FENCE __ PCE POST -> OUTFIELD PERIMETER FENCE SECTION gCTIOB G FENCE CAPSEE FENCING LAYOUT PUN NOT TO SCALE APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDMONDS DATE: BY: EDMONDS SCHC� T RT EDMONDS WOODWAY HIGH SCHOOL SYNTHETICTURF CONVERSION Fr HOGAN DATE 54-2U1B SCALE NTS DRAWN NCH LIRCAIP RSH �I °0 : SITE DETAILS SHEET F-2.12 a Packet Pg. 261 NOTE: ALL PORTABLE BLEACHERS TO CHAINUNK -� INCLUDE RAIL SYSTEM IN FENCING CONFORMANCE WITH CDC. SEE PIN/ NEW LAYOUTS FOR LOCATKIN OF WHEELCHAIR, COMPANION AND ACCESSIBLE SEATING. TOE BOARD 2 X 10 MILL FOOTBOARDS rI - 2 X 12- ANODIZED 2 �. SFATBOARD I j %-BR/BRACE L- 5'-5 7/a-/r J L-8'-2-2 5/0' 2•x12" PLASTIC STUD AT HORIZONTAL FOOTING BLEACHERS NOT TO SCALE HANDRNL GUARDRAIL 10' � 18.00• 3&W COMPANIONI CO P NSCA SEATING 42' I BLUE BACKCFODLNID BOLT ON TONGUE GUIDE E. BLUE SYMDOLOR 12• I I 8' ! NOTE BLUE LOR MIN. _ TO FED. CONFORM I� TO FED. COLOR I SOBD of FED. STD. SYBB SIGNAGE TYP. O *COMPANION SEAT WHEELCHAIR AREAS %-BRACE �If{NANCCEI i+4 10• L-B'-4 1/4' µ 8• % 8 0040 ALU. l L2X2X3/18 SUPPORT FRAME BOLTED TO LAST VEiRIZPA, RISER WITH 3/8 �1 1/4 CALY. CAP SCREWS, WFB 6 WASHERS (TAP. EACH FRAME) CANE DETECTION DEVICE PER BLEACHER MANUFACTURER DOCUMENTATION 1%e 1/2 ANOD. ALUM. RISER CM 8/8' NET SEATS (18• PER SEAT/ I 38' WHEELCHAIR NOTES LOCATION LENGTH SPAC S 1. 2 UNITS FIRST BASE ME JRD BASE UNE 1131/. 82 4'FS/ROIY - VINYL -CLAD STAINLESS STEEL STEEL AIRCRAFT CABLE SOCCER COAL GROLINDBAR (TV.) SOCCER COAL ADHERE/ SECURE O W; DBAR SYNTHETIC TURF TO GALVANIZED BOX CLAD �N16_• STAINLESS TOP OF COVER WITH STAINLESS STEEL AIRCRAFT INFlLLEO SYNTHETIC STEEL HARDWARE CABLE INFltl.m .,h7flNi'11C TURF SY"TE'lT TURF SYSTEM F-2.f LOCKABLE AR.'H04 CABLE 1OOP SWAGED LOCK LOOP. I F-2.1 LOOP AND CHAMP TO INRRNAL ANCHOR, DROP ACCESS HOLE WITH RUBBER GROMMOW.EUDED ADHERE/ SECURE SYNTHETIC TURF TO LMJ LOW[ PJ,RC. THROUGH ALUMINUM a ID COVER'S ACCESS HOLE TO ALUMINUM COVER O O PROVIDE A SEAMLESS LOOK 1/0• THICK AND STORES CONVENIENRY MATERIAL . INSIDE BOX WITH COVER • DI1ML ]/4' HOLE MULTI FIELD FOUNDATION FOR 01N1AIN.K'i PIPE BOX a< COVER MIN. 30DO PSI INSTALL 1' SCH SUPPORT (J) TWO CUBIC FOOT PVC PIPE FOR UNDERNEATH FOR CONCRETE FOOTING DRAIN HOLE HEAVY TRAFFIC MM. 3000 PSI TWO CUBIC FOOT NOTE; y CONCRETE FOOTING REMOVE HINGE FUNCTION FROM BOX _ TO PROVIDE REMOVABLE COVER, SOCCER GOAL ANCHOR F-2.13 NOT TO SCALE !s T Y APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDMONDS DATE: DT Cmu EN llk REVISION EDMONDS Is SCH®L R 11 EDMONDS WOODWAY HIGH SCHOOL SYNTHETIC TURF CONVERSION HOGAN 9ERy 8 BRA y F rs�" I `4 a! Fxn.vN DATE 5=lulx SCALE NTS DRAWN lcil CHECKED RSH 0 SITE DETAILS SHEET F-2.13 a Packet Pg. 262 120.00---------- I, A 26.25' I f 2- WIDE STRIPING 2'45 VE)DEND RUWERRED SURFACING 2' MIN. BEYOND SWING (TYP.) ASPHALT PAVING CONTINUES JAVELIN RUNWAY -PLAN VIEW AT PERIMETER OF RUNWAY NOT TO SCALE 34.97 THROWING DISCUS CAGE LAYOUT NOT TO SCALE - 1- DISCUS CIRCLE CONC. SLAB NOTE LIGHT BRppQQyy FlNSN COMIC. SLAB 1/64'1{1 MM) ROUGHNESS TROWEL FINISH re CONCREIC DRAIN PIPE 6 4 SEE PLAN +/- l.26' "Z 75' PAINTED MULINE R35' WIDE r L LINE M97 3/4- DEPRESSED LEVEL PAD MANIiACMT � L1gCy5 T171OW Po '--A�HTLT PAVING AlJ' UJ- r�T�[L)r1L _II 6' PERMEABLE BASE AGGREGATE .IIiJ1_III-Il�llhll COMPACTED SUBCRADE 3 DISCUS PAD SECTION F-2.14 NOT TO SCALE j' .75 OfED STAKING GI155E15 3f7iEQ1 UXE % 4. ROLLED Fur • THRONING CgtCCE� THREE (!) PLACEMENT NOTCHES - FOR REBAR PLACEMEM TEN (10) DRAINAGE PIPES FLUSH WRH TDP OF DEPRESSED CONCRETE OF THROW FORM SYSTEM NOT TO SCALE FORMED ALUMINUM FRAME - STAINLESS IE INCLUDED UPRIGHT SWIVEL SNAP PULLEY 4- O.D. K .125 IL 17'-G' ALUMINUM TUBE MAIN NET HOOK SNAP 14'-0- CLEAT BARRIER NET HOOK SNAP 26- TYP- CONCNETE PAVING CORE CUT PAVING FOR BASE FOOTING INSTALLATION AGGREGATE 2� S- DIA CONCRETE FoaTr+c • -� 16' DIP'CONCRETE FOOTNG SLEEVE APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION PEA GRAVEL 5T0P801T CITY OF EDMONDS B- MIN. DEPTH 5 DISCUS CAGE UPRIGHT DATE: F.2.lA NOT TO SCALE Irr: �pf_FW10 CN4L11 REVISION 1:1 WON III, SCHLQIL �� •r lcr EDMONDS WOODWAY HIGH SCHOOL SYNTHETIC TURF CONVERSION [ ��.^.�h�G`� HOGAN e�Et s..L4 Rp 4 R DATE 5d 2D16 SCALE NTS 0-y'N 1CH a.HEa:m A1H FIELD EVENT DETAILS SHEET F-2.14 a Packet Pg. 263 i 5 —�- 45' I----r 4.5' L'L7iTER J umm 16' SIDE LINE NEW NET NEW NET 2V POST ALLEY LINE 0 42' W NEVI TE a Te• J 3. 3' —I 21• 9M I SERVICE UNE— le, 2' WHITE PAINTED LINES (1YP) _ BASE LINE �-- NOTE: 13.5 --I ALL DIMENSIONS MEASURED FROM THE OUTSIDE OF 2' PAINTED LINES EXCEPT FOR CENTER NARK. TENNIS COURT MARKINGS NOT TO SCALE NETS AND POSTS ARE CONNECTED TOGETHER ACCORDING TO MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATION 3' DIAMETER STEEL POST MIN. 11 GAGE WALL THICKNESS CAP PROVIDED BY TENNIS COURT NAMLEACNU»4R ACRYLIC SURFACE —1� I COMPACTED SUBGRADE 36' I I CORE & POUR FOOTINGn ER FIRST ACP 58.5' I r N31IN 3DXI PSI CONC. FOOTING FOR SLEEVE Q • e a O ' n — 3-1/2" DIAMETER STEEL SLEEVE, 3/10" THICK if PEA GRAVEL 21 MIN 2 TENNIS COURT -NET POST F-2.i5 NOT TO SCALE PRE —MANUFACTURED TIE —DOWN PROVIDED UY MANUFACTURER ROD COURT SURFACING CDWACTw�-- 1 Gf— �� SUBGRWETAFTER NEW 25" X P" in► ' — FIRST LIFT ACP GALV. STEEL TUBE _ n A 18• CONCRETE FOOTING a • F. 6' I 6" X 1/4" ROD PEA GRAVEL i f — 12- Du. 3 TENNIS COURT -NET TIE DOWN F-Y.15 NOT TO SCALE APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDMONDS DATE BY: •aChrLI REVISION EDMONDS Is SCHODL DIR I RIOT EDMONDS WOODWAY HIGH SCHOOL SYNTHETIC TURF CONVERSION 1-6- �')A HOGAN sw�hwle�io peps a ,M R DATE 5-4-2013 SCALE NTS DRAWN NCH CHECKED IT [ONw,.IQw FIELD EVENT DETAILS SHEET F-2.15 Q Packet Pg. 264 .11 BEGIN 40' HIGH BACK" - 20,pp• END OF 40' HIGH BACKSTOP FENCING FENCING. END eD' FAWN BEGIN J0' HIGH NETTING OVER NETTING OVER 10 HT. I 10' Hf. CHAINUNK CHAINLNK 80.00' F-2.9 W S' SINGLE �N 40.OD' 40-51NH0 i-P.9 s vw GATE oucou _ ' �WcouT 2.17 2.17 e0m' S' OPENING S' OPENING (rnJ ITYP ) ff,11 Y SINCEP "m "m 8' SINGLE SWING GATE i-2.II F-2.9 JO' HIGH NETTING_' ETTING CONTINUE JO' HIGH OVER 10' HT. CHAINUNK. BULLPEN NETTING OYER 10' HT. CHAINUNK. PLAN VIEW BASEBALL BACKSTOP -WING FENCING IaRa%11� NOT TO SCALE WELD ANGLE IRON 70 POST. �/B M' CALM. CARRIAGE GRIND ALL WELDS SMOOTH. PAINT WITH BOLTS- 2 BOLTS PER Dow 1 2 COATS GALVACDN OR EQUAL. (TYP) O ENDS AND CENTER POSE. PEEN BOLT ENDS IA' ANG1E WOE• {LiP� TO PREVENT REMOVAL mAGE BOLTS INI.�1O BOARDS, 7RF.M® AND SIAp4F,O. POOL SWIDS CAPS INSTALL 2" PAD YO COVER' STOP BOARDS. SECURELY ATTACH TO STOP BON= POST DIA VARES TucK BAWMOP FENCE FABRIC oFnVEEM MIDDLE RAIL k STOP BDAM (2• MIN.) 1• CLEAR 4 2• CONCRETE PAYING BASE AGGREGATE 2fOURAIG 15• CONCRETE CURBING CONCRETE FODTc4O �� 4• MIN. 2 \ BACKSTOP WITHSTOPBOARDS F-2.i6 NOT TO SCALE ®40' HDCKT CHAIN LINK FENCE; 2• MESH XC GAUX BELOW 10'. X9 GAUGE ABOVE 1O'• TOP• BOTTM MID S' INTERMEDIATE RAILS ® 40' OVERALL; 10' HEIGHT CHAIN LINK FENCE; 2• 1 MESH XB GAUGE, TOP, MIDDLE, BOTTOM RAIL. 30' X2•SO. NYLON NETTING ABOVE m 10' HIGHT CHAIN LINK FENCE; 2• MESH X9 GAUGE. TOP, MIDDLE. BOTTOM RAIL 1 T T I Je Je 1 FDD11M0 DEPTH ' AND L'XAAlTER S 24• i�7' 24• •. CONCRETE CONCRETE CURBING (TYP) CURBING (TYP) WELD ANGLE IRON TO BE98AQI{ POST GRIND ALL MO PRESSURE PRES'TREATED WELDS SMOOTH. PAINT 2X19 PRPRESSURE2XIC ANGLE 2 COATS TREATED DGMGIS FIR OGIIDIAS FYI S4S. GALVACON OR EQUAL.. LINE POST s45- INSTALL o0AR04 fN$TAI.4 BOARDS EARTEO (TYp) BlfWITH TO[7GAPS, TW u YRTHWIT Gin W101piF CPS. 4• POSTETKM� 4• POST Tim X e• CA4ST TREATED AND STAINED W/CAP W/CAP CAARNOE BCLB. • 2 BOLTS PER BOARD • IDMS AND CENTER POST. PM B04T vnTFL H iA0 1 vA0 ro C ENDS TO PREVENT STOP ATTACH TO BO0 SSITTOP BOMDS- SECURELY REMOVAL I - L 1• CLEAR � 1 N 2 [sEE swIDULE) . F-2-9 - 24• _ 24. APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDMONDS p (TTYP) FRONT ELEVATION DATE: STOPBOARDS By, NOT TO SCALE REVISION DAIS EDMONDS Is SCH®L RICT EDMONDS WOODWAY HIGH SCHOOL SYNTHETIC TURF CONVERSION 1 - F't HOGAN 0£gC1 R. N4y Y` E F DAR 5-4-2018 SCALE NTS DRAWN ICH CHECKED RSH BACKSTOP DETAILS SHEET F-2.16 a Packet Pg. 265 7.1.j OIACOIR FICRF N016 1. PROVIDE 4' O.D. ASTN A53, OR B, SCHED 40 GALV S L COLUMNS AT 10'-0' OC TO SUPPORT DUGOUT ROOF. AUGN WITH FE1D FENCE POSTS. PROMDE BASE PVS FOR FRONT COLUMNS AM SECURE TO FIELD FENCE POST FOOIINGS. SEE 2/A4 FOR BASE PL GET. 2. INSTALL SHY MET RFG, MET DECK AND FASTENERS PER MFR'S WRITTEN INSTRUCTIONS• 3. COMPLY WITH ALL LOCAL CODES AND ORDINANCES. ' 4. SET CARRIAGE BOLT HEADS AND WASHERS IN SILICONE SEALANT. SEAL BETWEEN S L C-PURUNS AND FENCE POSTS ALL MOUND WITH SILICONE SEALANT. S-PRE-PAIHTFD OFT flu S C SHALL BE FIN1SHEp SAME AS SM MET RFD �B�HEADS OF GASKETED MET FASTENERS SMALL BE PRE -PAINTED TO MATCH SHT MET RFG AND FLASHING. 1 ■ DUGOUT PLAN VIEW F-2.I7 NOT TO SCALE FLAAeSN"M SEAL BETWEEN RFG AND F11L91N0 A7 'ff TAM FASTENER 20 CAAT 12' OC. TYP CALV WET CUP FENCE POST PANEL NO 2 DUGOUT ROOF RAKE EDGE F_217 NOT TO SCALE L1r DIA Fro Lam.. FTC 3 DUGOUT SECTION VIEW F-2.17 NOT TO SCALE 24 GA PRE -PAINTED MET FLASHING SECURED WITH GASKEIED FASTENER — AT 12' OC 24 CA SUPER --SPAN PRE -PALM EO (WRATECH MET ROOF PANELS AS MANUFACRIRFD BY X MM OR APPROVED EQUAL ON 20 GA GAILY 1-1/27 DEEP B-M MET CD'TL WTH FLUTES AT 6' OC. FASTEN ROOF PANELS TO DECK AT 12' OC PERPENDICULAR TO SLOPE T3' MAX FROM ENDS) AND AT 24- OC PARALLEL. TO SLOPE (6- MAX FROM ENDS)- SECURE DECK 10 PURIIHB WITH 112 SHEET METAL SCREWS AT V OC IX`6' x ?,W 16 CA CALV C-PURUN (SR - I5w OWN). FASTEN WIN [2) 1/4' DIA TYPE 24 cA 14-4 SS BOLTS, NUrs R PRE -PAINTED MET W SM'm e OC R" EAVE FLASHING EAeLPOM. CUnER Mn ON 4 DUGOUT ROOF SECTION F Z.17 NOT TO SCALE / ASIM AX GAtV STL PL ` 1 K% S—I/2" 14Ln FxN � KA11[ BOLT 3 NOG. IYP 5 � � �YEELO 1 1 I / I. / ` ] 4. TM rf � f �OmKCRESE Ba KMEDIIWA F.2.7 — BROOM i1NIS11 . Tr . ♦ -� - {I. 04 RESNA CONTINUOUS EXCEPT AT _ RAti SIGN JOINTS 20'0' O.C. 5 CONCRETE DUGOUT -EXPANSION JOINT F_2,17 NOT TO SCALE i� 9' CONCRETE SURFACE TO HAVE FINE BROOM FINISH zH BROOM FINISH TO BE IN DIRECTION OF RUN-OFF. STEEL TROWEL EDGES W/ 1/2' RADIUS. DUGOUT ROOF COLUMN 2-17 FABRIC FABRIC BOTTOM ]RN Ai 1' MINIMUM FINISH 1B• A -LOW ONLY ENOUGH �NF1ELf! SURFACE GRADE li SPACE FOR FORMS 5_lY 18' MIN CONCRETE 6116x10/10 W.W.M FENCE 1 PAVING 95% COMPACTED POST F-fit 3. SUBGRADE DUAA. CONCRETE FOOTING 6 PLAYERS BENCH DETAIL F_2,17 NOT TO SCALE APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDMONDS DATE HY REVISION EDMONDS Is SCHOOL D ss I I I T EDMONDS WOODWAY HIGH SCHOOL SYNTHETIC TURF CONVERSION r6r DA HOGAN III All .nw se,wu u° iwsxes weo DATE 5-4-2018 SCALE HIs 0AU WN ICH CHECKED ESH .wsQm DUGOUT DETAILS SHEET F-2.17 a Packet Pg. 266 7.1.j COMPOSITE LAYOUT PLAN SCALE: 1'=20' WHITE LINES WHITE LINES BLACK LINES INLAID LINES PAINTED LINES (BY OWNER) INLAID HOME PLATES APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDMONDS DATE: BY: CRY ENGINEERING OMSION REVISION DAVI EDMONDS Is SCH®L RISI R.IT EDMONDS WOODWAY HIGH SCHOOL SYNTHETIC TURF CONVERSION ,_ HOGAN II., w. o"f 5A-201.9 COMPOSITE LAYOUT PLAN & DETAILS SHEET F-3.1 a Packet Pg. 267 7.1.j 5' OUTSIDE DIA ON DECK ME PANTEL 01' OTHOM OR THROW OOWII MAT (TTP.1 1... J t-a09D -1 9moo' Ow.) 4f1 ]7.00' l7 UNIT OF 8 ¢ INFIELD (M.) / RUNDPITCHER'S FOOL LINE J NOG'1D FOUL) TURF , 5 15.00' �— RI]A0 RYS-0O' ANC YID PNCHOR BEDYITe "THETIC GYP.) ] BASEBALL MARKING PLAN F_3•2 NOT TO SCALE ]RD BV'E iAYOUf POINT B.11d• _ f I L f HOME PLATE LAYOUT POINT CONCRETE HOME PLATE _ OUNNE LAYOUT POINT BASE AND PLATE ANCHOR LAYOUT NOT TO SCALE �" g[nP,) 2.1 a.T OAS£9Y L BATT:Tfs Box ] F-].2 ON wu -- 7.50• 00.00' / ]RD BASE LAYOUT 2ND BASE POINT � - / � LAYOUT POINT I BASE WITH ] LAYOUT BASE ANCHOR (TYP) LAY F-S.1 POINT 24A0' i _ FOUL LINE � (TYP) /43.00' I BATE 111I71 ANCHOR (TYP F-S.t � I F�5.3 // � PITCHQtS �tk / PLATE / - FOAL uNE / �.) .. 47.7lL- C s`_ (' 1ST BASE OU OU. LAYOUT POINT —41 SAFETY WE BROWN COLOR INFILL SYNTHETIC TUI BASEBALL BATTERS BOX NOT TO SCALE HOME PLATE BEVELED EDGE MAINTAIN 4 M4' GP AROUND 0. TD FACILITATE REMOVAL ADHERE SYNTHERC TURF BACKING TO TOP OF CONCRETE SOIL BEARIN SIROCTURAL FABRI TOP OF HOME PLATE TO BE FLUSH NTH RUBBER WILL INFILLFO SYNTHETIC TURF r- TOP COURSE PERMEABLE AGGREGATE EWE COURSE PERMEABLE AGGREGATE QA TOTAL DEPTH OF RUBBER PLATE _ COMPACTED SUBGRADE QB DEPTH OF HOME PLATE HOME PLATE MINUS DEPTH OF INFILL NOT TO SCALE BASE ANCHOR SLEEVE — BASE WITH ANCHOR NOT TO SCALE ANCHOR PLATE INFLLED r SYNTHETIC TURF NOTE PROVIDE 2' RUBBER PLUG WITH SOLD CAP TO FIT IN SLEEVE APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDMONDS DATE: DY' Ir . b sncwnla NEVISIDN DATE EDMONDS ts SCH®L D 1$1RICT EDMONDS WOODWAY HIGH SCHOOL SYNTHETIC TURF CONVERSION L HOGAN DATE 54-2018 SCALE NTS DRAWN ICH CHECKED RSH xT p m BASEBALL LAYOUT PLAN & DETAILS SHEET F-3.2 a Packet Pg. 268 14' SFTHn•IETICNT m '�` I m k 14' BA1TR►9 C.1GE `NEmHc w rr SINGLE 5W,N0 TURF�TE ",j FINISHED4' LINE FENCE POST +O.B]' ENPARSION (10' MOUND UOINT �2,4— 4' BEUHIND BATTING CAGE Hf.) },g' POSECRETINMETTING FINISHED H:B'Ir10'BULLPEN GARDE MOUND PAAAID TE 3 f 7 BUNKER INFlU.ED - SYNTHETIC 60.50' /-INFt11-ED SLATE-I1GJ TURF (!TIP) 1 I � N INLAID PITCHER'S PLATE M7.) 12 e0.00' 1 BATTING CAGE PLAN VIEW (BASE BID) F-3.3 NOT TO SCALE 21' r L 14' -----� NETTING. (TYP-) 1L -- I I IFIFRLEI i r T AC F_2.T TURF JURF T IT +! I 2' TOP COURSE PERMEABLE I AGM4;ATIE PAVING 70 SLOPE 12.2' 8A5E AWAY FROM AG PESt1 VBlE PACIEO 6uBmuce W % 12' CONCRETE FOOTING � FOR 3' GRWNO SLEEVE C� BATTING CAGE SECTION NOT TO SCALE SYNTHETIC TURF OVER PERMEABLE AGGREGATE BASE 10- gNUNKJ F,7+CINC IN CONCRETE CURB OR PAVING W �'l f TURF 12M12' 1 CONCRETE CURB ■-2-+ 3/4-1' CHLAALrER STRIP UNE POST INSET (REMOVE WITH FOPM WORK) INFlUiD SYNTHETIC TURF I CONTAINMENT SINGLE SWING CURD OAi-.] EXPANSION FENCE L]X( CONCRETE CURB FLUSH R 3 JOINT j FINISH GARDE 4bf9_r1 F-2.9 RASE BID: _ - 12• THREE (3) BATING CAGES iY r FENCE LINET'TI AND TWO (2) COVERED$; TERMINAL POST BATTING CAGE TUNNELS IN 10 3/4'- 1' CHLVSER STRIP CWL8E0 IN PLACE TIGHT TO FENCE BUILDING POST OURHO rom wmsm)Crow, RAN 11E1 0 CORNER OF BOBBD - e1-er ,r 40.67' TEPOOH }� 14 � I 14 � FENCEE POST P7aEFHa6GTiV r BATING CAGE U�y WITH NETTING �rD_ I` I 1J FElH 0 FENCE ENC (TY1P•) GRADE CHANGE SO' CHNN LINK FENCE IN CONCRETE 12' CURB F- GLUEE��AOHEAE TURF ON YOP OF CONCRETE If MFVEO FOOTING (TYPJ CURB OR PAVING 58.5' 66.d' 110.6' j 7.0' ANCHOR L0.0' 8U pEFi 2DJ AgUrrO - - 0.01-• 5' SINOLE_11< �CIWNLINK iY6N0 GATE - FENCNG AND ) FlEID SHOE NETTING IN F-Z ] ) BULLPEN -PLAN VIEW CONCRETE CURB F-3.3 I NOT TO SCALE µ REBME Y O.C. — 10.00' 19.0' e' 1.50'CURB REVEAL —1+'1_ 4" CONCRETE.---' PAD I;pMliv&E _tNE FENCE rSU DETAL ABOVE—�\ / SEE LINE POST FOR SECTION OF INSET TO THE LMA.RPE7RMOUND RIGHT BASEBALL BULLPEN MOUND -SYNTHETIC TURF NOT TO SCALE law IT �J •iG9lll�J' Ill EDMONDS WOODWAY HIGH SCHOOL aX%ii a••aRaSYNTHETICTURIF •` ••�•?°° �sO a ayi°aai*aab�gi + 1 ya•CONVERSION vt pai°aiai°�H►O*°Q' 1 Fri• � .0 i1 r� �• ¢♦••• ••••4 E 1 i r� ia.aY°•aay�°••� 1 I L I aQ•-4•a i `� e ��°aim•°• ; •1 ] fi a•••a aaa •a4�a.� 41... �� *� e�•f..HOGAN PEN MOUND ,3yis ni CWAINMEXT cups •'�= later .�'r. CITY OF • • 5' SINOLE_11< �CIWNLINK iY6N0 GATE - FENCNG AND ) FlEID SHOE NETTING IN F-Z ] ) BULLPEN -PLAN VIEW CONCRETE CURB F-3.3 I NOT TO SCALE µ REBME Y O.C. — 10.00' 19.0' e' 1.50'CURB REVEAL —1+'1_ 4" CONCRETE.---' PAD I;pMliv&E _tNE FENCE rSU DETAL ABOVE—�\ / SEE LINE POST FOR SECTION OF INSET TO THE LMA.RPE7RMOUND RIGHT BASEBALL BULLPEN MOUND -SYNTHETIC TURF NOT TO SCALE law IT �J •iG9lll�J' Ill EDMONDS WOODWAY HIGH SCHOOL aX%ii a••aRaSYNTHETICTURIF •` ••�•?°° �sO a ayi°aai*aab�gi + 1 ya•CONVERSION vt pai°aiai°�H►O*°Q' 1 Fri• � .0 i1 r� �• ¢♦••• ••••4 E 1 i r� ia.aY°•aay�°••� 1 I L I aQ•-4•a i `� e ��°aim•°• ; •1 ] fi a•••a aaa •a4�a.� 41... �� *� e�•f..HOGAN PEN MOUND ,3yis ni CWAINMEXT cups •'�= later .�'r. CITY OF • • somm BROWNSYNTHTIRF BY:TURF F-$.1 CFILLED TO BE LEVEL 10' ABOVE FIELD FINISH SN GRADE TO 31-V GRADE SLOPE AWAY FROM{10' _ BATTING CAGE ' `y jr RADIUS PPOOI (4) 1TH6' RECYCLED FENCING PLASTIC TIMBER SCH �� INSTALLED PER RADIUS r.i (TYP•) 4 CENTER INDICATED 2 REMOVABLE TURF INSERT H R9' F-2-8 WITH VELCRO EDGES 4.4 RECYCLED PLASTIC TIMBER SURROUNDING CONC IETE PAD 4' CONCRETE PAD - UNDER SYNTHETIC TURF CMNUK T-N('C }2:1 SLOPE FROM A SZMUUXp POINT B" N FRONT OF BUI THE PITCHER'S RUBBER TO A PLAN VIEW POINT 6' TOWARDS HOME PLATE E 7-6' 34-- 5'-2- 1 w 4• 1 VELCRO REPLACEMENT PANEL I f-2-1 SYMHET TURr TUff va +• L a a Ik IN _IO' CHNNLINK �\ 4 (4) 1"%e' RECYCLED PLASTIC TIMBER INSTALLED FOR RADIUS . D ^ 9ASE COlIR6E FEHCINC LY CONCRETE CURB ll`-2J81 INDICATED j4 REHAR 2' O.C. 4• CONCRETE P PLAgTK; 761DEP DI PEibREAB1E /WIWE' HtATE OR PAVING LENCTHS AS REQUIRED. D71DI1•W a 14 NEW 2' O.C. 5 SYNTHETIC TURF MOUND F-3.3 I NOT TO SCALE TIMBER IN LENGTHS AS Kkswnum--- REWIRED. RRS'fALLFD FOR ROOM�4 R®M 2' O.C. INDICATED 14 TEW 2. O.C. DATE SA-2018 SCALE NTS DRAWN 10R CHEaED SON BASEBALL DETAILS SHEET F-3.3 a Packet Pg. 269 CORNER KICK AREA e F-J.4 PENALTY KICK LINE r RESTRAINING LINE FOR I PENALTY KKM 10 0) �.�' 24' GOAL (0/0) R3C wo R30' ((}./0) PENALTY AREA L 2.77 1&m I V CENTER CIRCLE g GOAL AREA (0/D) F-JA SOCCER 2 HASH F-k4 MARKS 1 Ry r 41 (TYP) CORNER KICK A SOCCER LAYOUT PLAN NOT TO SCALE 5I- } NY 300.00' OUTSIDE TO OUTSIDE (TYP) - RIFTED BUCK SOCCER UNE RAgUS POINT FOR CORNER KICK 11Aim BLACK SOCCER LINE Q I JJ 3' - p5L 3 ppSQII COALS o s PRaADE 2- 4. 8REA1fS FDR ED ST:N10 LMIE m ESIDNAIG!" TE GOAL LDCAOOfNS SOCCER F-3.4 KIS AIS F-3.4 PAINTET { BREAK IN BLACK SOCCER LIKE IN Imo/ INSIDE OF PLAYING FIELD V I FIELD -24' 4• BREAK IN BLACK SOCCER LINE INSIDE OF PLAYING FlELD 4• INWD BLACK SOCCER LINE SOCCER HASH MARKS 3 CORNER KICK DETAIL 4 SOCCER GOAL ALIGNMENT SQUARES F-3.4 NOT TO SCALE F-3.4 NOT TO SCALE F-3.4 NOT TO SCALE T'r WHITE LINE 4• TUFTED CRAM GREEN 4• BUCK INLAID 7 MID -FIELD LINE AT SIDELINE F-3.4 NOT TO SCALE 4• INLAID rRd10 OR TUFTEI LONE 4 INLAID 2• �� INLAID B•B CIRCLE '!11 II �� I111 SOCCER CIRCLE AND MID -FIELD LINE -FOR NOT TO SCALE III -� OF 40 YARD LINE PAINTED _ 4- REVISION DATE I•.115WNW1 Is scli Tl. EDMONDS WOODWAY HIGH SCHOOL SYNTHETIC TURF CONVERSION HOGAN A cA t s.rtj,� Y�� II li• � 4�ixP. DT g A L DATE 51 2018 SCALE NTS DRAWN JCH CHECKED RSH SOCCER LAYOUT PLAN & DETAILS SHEET F-3.4 a Packet Pg. 270 7.1.j BACK OF RfliEI.DR 3W INSIDE EDCE OF GOAL LINE .... .... .... .... ... 0 1 P � FIA I I 1 1 4 1 1 1 1 1 P 1I I LIFT lIII 1111 11I1 1111 II II 1111 I1I I111 1111 11i1 1,111 1111 1111 1111 I11I 1 11I 1Ii �• .It'll I L 1 2' r T � 11II 27• IEI. -2 I . . CE . I -3 11f II11 11I1 +III �i II1I i11 1111 1I.1 ,1 F II. l �.� 1� i1 iI 53•-4- ,11 ,TiT 2. ALL UNE WORK IS TO BE LAID OUT WITH A TOLERANCE OF 1/4 INCH. 3. ALL YARDLINES SHALL BE 4 NCH, WHITE, TUFTED INTO THE TURF PANELS. 4- AN 4 INCH WHITE LINE, TUFTED INTO THE TURF. WILL SURROUND THE ENTIRE PLAYING FIELD. D(CEPT AS NOTED. 1 FOOTBALL LAYOUT PLAN F-3.5 NOT TO SCALE 1' 4. I' Q OF FIELD PANTED LINES 4• WHTM 40 YARD LINE TUFTED �� INTO TURF PANEL / 2 \ KICK-OFF MARKER F-3.5 NOT TO SCALE r l flTTP1ND PANTm LINE TO UMR OF SYNIINFT-C TL)RI (TY'P,) 1. SHORT YAROUNE DREMNS AND HASHMARKS ARE SHOWN FOR REFERNCE ONLY. 2, NUMBERS ARE SHOWN FOR REFERENCE ONLY. DO NOT INSTALL ] 6MHiN�j IN i'ILLI1 ARE PANTED EFY DhNER 1. THE 3-YARD LINES ARE 24 INCHES LONG. 4 INCHES WIDE, WHITE INLAID LINES I1. AN K wL1 MARK THE SPOT OF THE KICKOFF AT THE w YARDUNE ON EACH END OF THE AT THE CENTERLINE OF THE FIELD AND THE 3 YAF43UNE ON EACH END OF THE FIELD. THE 40 YAJDUNE SHM.L BE WHITE TURF TUFTED INTO THE TURF PANELS AND THE FIELD. REFER TO PLAN FOR LOCATION. NOROOPM FROM THE X SNA. DE PAWL WHITE 2. 4 WHITE YARDUNE MARKERS AS SHOWN ON PLAN MEASURING 4 INCHES IN HEIGHT AND 4 FEET W WIDTH WITH THE TWO TOP MARKINGS 27 FEET FROM THE SIDELINES ARE INLAID TURF. TUFTED TURF 4- SIDELINE r 4' N. 4' — PAINTED WHITE TURF TUFMD TURF YARDUNE 3 SIDE LINE DETAIL F-3.5 NOT TO SCALE INLAID OR PANTED TUFTED INTO INBOUNDS ONES TURF PANEL PER LAYOUT PLAN 'I 1— 4• PANTED Ij a I / 4 \ INBOUND LINE DETAIL F-3.5 NOT TO SCALE APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDMONDS DATE, BY: RIW-aNN DAIC EDMONDS Is SCH®L IST RIOT EDMONDS WOODWAY HIGH SCHOOL SYNTHETIC TURF CONVERSION KI-rT HOGAN LKS S.444 'pObY Yf'�c r ��Ek P.011� AR4 DATE 5-4-2010 SCALE NTS DRAWN 1CH CHECKED MI. C) FOOTBALL LAYOUT PLAN & DETAILS SHEET F-3.5 Packet Pg. 271 7.1.j EDGE A C E C' 20'-0' RIDGE r C----�`�«��] C-----------7 GRADE BEAM AS REQUIRED BY STRUC DESIGN, SEE NOTE 3. TYP F- L -TTJ L,TJ 31 II IF 11 ji I) 11 II 11 II II II II I ASTICPLWPw rK FCN7 TRM Si�uM DEATSJdAEBREVATIDN f I I I AS TOP OF FGT4CE CUf�. SEE FIEIDBDMIQS. T1'P I I I I 4mc FDOTIN� SEE ND1E S. M I I II II F- r1L, L--J L--J FOUNDATION B SLAB PLAN �� PLAN VIEW & DOOR SCHEDULE F-3.6 NOT TO SCALE RTAMEWIDTH DOGRWnTH Til aq� O 1 A B 2 DOOR FRAMES AND TYPES F-3.6 NOT TO SCALE C e C NTROL JOINT, JALLYSPACEI WIN REINF A' DD BY STRUC 31GN, TYP NC SLAB ON ADS rY n n CENTER FENCE PI40lyF i' MAx ON COLUMNS BETWEEN STRUT 8 FFNT[F POST TYP W8, TYP . BLDG A LIGHT FIXTURE BACK OF LIGHTFD(TURE MOUNTING BOX 10' HIGH ..AN LINK [%i FENCE,CENTERED ST EXTEND POSTS AND TO SECURE TO STRUC ST ADJUST POST LOCATIONS AS REQUIRED TO MISS CC LIGHT FIXTURES. FE BY to I-3.7 Iry � LN Pl [ FC I. C( UHT tt URE% BATTING CAGE SYNTHETIC TURF ASSEMBLYON SUBGRADE, SEE SYNTHETIC TURF ASSEMBLYON SUBGRADE, SEE D; FIELDS DRAWINGS 7 FIELDS DRAWINGS ,5'-1112• 7✓7' a LY p1FF WRAP CMU WAINSCOT 1B• NOM AT CORNER TI'J' 3 E-17 10'HIGHCHAIN C D C LINK FENCE WI 5 4 aa•ILr-0• GATE. _ EXTEND POSTS TO EQ CUR EQ CUR STRUC. SEE 4A S 4C/A1,018M1, TYP !L1 r PANEL, SEE ELEC - PROVIDE MET !<IUDSUPPORT - 1 D 1 3 I I F-S.7 I I TrP 1 J. FLOOR PLAN 4" LINK FENCE TO :UC ABOVE SECURE 'S OF POSTS TO :UC. TYP 4C CURB UNDER ICE, SEE FIELDS CS. TYP HT M%TU 1E, SEE O-PFMVtDE 040S$ RLINS AS REQUIRED R FIXTURE MOUNTING ITFB AlCBSYIEB. DRD WITH ELEC TYP TYP -0" X 7'-0" GATE, TYP ENTER WALL ON GRID D m V HIGH X 3B• DEEP MET HELF UNITS, (4) AT BO" WIDTH ND (4) AT 72- WIDTH W FIXTURE SEE ELEC. ENTER IN ROOM. ROVIDE CROSS PURLINS S REQUIRED FOR COUNTING. COORD WITH LEC TYP PLAN NORTH NORTH DOOR SCHEDULE DOOR FRAME DETAILS REMARKS w i o r'9-' f SIZE N (ICHES) r `4--' 3 f SIZE (I SBESHTAIAI r� a a w Ei 4 � W ¢ 3 a � (a9 w i W H W H HEAD JAMB JAMB SILL I II 61L 120 95 - 37 m 39 3T 1 2 B 6'TL 1p B6 ?I 39 39 3] : 1 3 A !0{ 4B M I HM 52 Ae 29 N M 29 2 4 A IY m M 1 HM 40 BB 29 39 39 29 1 5 A IKM 38 M 1 HM I as Be 29 34 34 29 - 1 6 A I NM 1 45 M 1 HM 52 M 2B 34 NOTES 1 OVHD COILING DOOR. COORD SUPPORT WITH MET BLDG MFR WALL TYPES YW METAL STUDS AT 18' OC BETWEEN METAL BLDG HORIZONTAL PURLINS. ALIGN F.O. STUDS WITH SHEET METALSIDING R0. PURLINS ON METAL FRAMING WMD00-5016j BY METAL BLDG MFR PLYM'ODO PRNEI SHEET METAL SIDING ON METAL FRAMING BY LER'TAL BLD6 DFR OAS SHOWN O A3 SNDwK 4' HIGH CMU WAINSCOT BELOW 20 METAL STUDS AT 16' OC (2X4 STUDS AT SHEET METALSIDING CONTRACTOR'S OPTION) ON METAL FRAMING BY METAL BUGG MFR 510• MDO (1SIOE) PLYWOOD PANEL OASSHOWNT057RUCABOVE O AS SHOWN PLAN LEGEND A > WALLTYPE �O DOORNUMBER,SEE DOOR SCHED BUILDING CODE NOTES (2012 INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE) OCCUPANCY: U CONSTRUCTION TYPE: V-B FLOOR AREA: 4,382 SF OCCUPANT LOAD: 1,36WOO - 15 PROPERTY LINE SEPARATION: 10 FEET MIN ALLOWABLE AREA: 5,500 SF ALLOWABLE BUILDING HEIGHT; 1 STORY PLAN NOTES 1 DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF CMU AND EDGE OF CONC SLAB, AND TO CENTERLINE OF DOORS AND INT WALLS, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE 2 CONC SLAB ON GRADE SHALL BE 4' MIN THICKNESS WITH IM REINFORCING BARS AT 12'OC EA WAY ON SUBGRADE OF 4'OF CRUSHED ROCK BASE MATERIAL ON VAPOR RETARDER ON COMPACTED STRUCTURAL FILL OR UNDISTURBED SOIL, 3, CONC FOOTINGS, FOOTING PLINTHS AND GRADE BEAMS SHALL BE BIDDER DESIGNED BY STRUCT ENGINEER LICENSED IN THE STATE OF WASHINGTON. COORD WITH MET BLDG MFR 4. SUPPORT FOR MET SIDING AND CMU SHALL BE BY MET BLDG MFR PROVIDE SUPPORTS AT 4'-0' OC MAX 5. SUPPORT FOR OVHD COILING DOOR AND MAN DOOR ASSEMBLIES SHALL BE BY MET BLDG MFR. S. PAINT HM DOORS AND FRAMES AND MET BLDG STEEL MEMBERS THAT ARE EXPOSED TO THE EXTERIOR T SEE 41A1,01 8 FIELDS DRAWINGS FOR FENCE DETAILS ABBREVIATLONS: ADDL ADDITIONAL DR DOOR H. HT HEIGHT SCHED SCHEDULE BLDG BUILDING DS DOWNSPOUT HOW HARDWARE ED STORM DRAIN BO, BOTTOM OF DWG DRAWING HM HOLLOW MET SF SQUARE FEET CHAN CHANNEL EA EACH Its INTERIOR BHT SHEET CLR CLEAR ELEC ELECTRICAL MAX MAXIMUM STL STEEL CMU CONC MASONRY EO EQUAL MET METAL STRUC STRUCTURAL UN R EXT EXTERIOR MFR MANUFACTURER T.O. TOP OF COL COLUMN GA GAUGE MIN MINIMUM TYP TYPICAL CONC CONCRETE COORD COORDINATE GRP GROUP NOM OC NOMINAL ON CENTER W WIDTH APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION BET DETAIL OVHD OVERHEAD CITY OF EDMONDS DATE: BY: 1 rRn REVISION DATE F',I.1st[ NWII Is SCH(Ot 1 EDMONDS WOODWAY HIGH SCHOOL SYNTHETIC TURF CONVERSION ,i HOGAN OATS 5d 201B SCALE NTS DRAWN JCH CHECKED RSH p — 0— tints•ARetwn ALTERNATE BID BATTING CAGE STRUCTURE SHEET F-3.6 Q Packet Pg. 272 n I'l tROSS PURLN BETWEEN OOF PURLINS AT FENCE MET BLDG EAVE OST LOCATIONS(FURNISHED PURLIN Y MET BLDG MFR) 4' OD STD WL PIPE WITH 411T X 6"X OD NTO WT PIPE WITH lX6 % 3116' CONT WELDED PL SECURE11P CONT WFJITEII FS SECURE TO Ifou w Ar&"DDIvURLINS WITH (4) 1/4"-14 X 11/4" SELF DRiLIHD $C.REIYb. NOT I7IP OALVRILLING SCREWS -HOT DIP GALV 4.ODFENCE POSTWITH31I2"OD CONT WELDED GALV PIP♦' NSTe0' OD FENCE PORT WTNR 3 NS OD OAT WELDED GALV PIPE INSERT l�1 SEC E IRETWTHAD C8 i ET AT T F E B TAT FIATTIM0 CAGE EA pBETWEENSBALLABBALLSTOR) p p I I I CHAIN LINK FENCE, TYP — — CONC PLINTH — NETBLDGOOI a o v n 4 112'X BASE PL `1 4 UT X T X 3/1B PL A I AtFSTTM .f,+i8>r' IAy OCCURS AipT TSLIV ER COLUMN FOOTINGS) I a NORTH ELEVATION F FENCEUTYP STRUC COL, TYP GUTT RRnPINTED MET Q STL ROD BRACING AS REO'D BY MET BLDG DESIGN, TYP SOUTH ELEVATION _SKT MET ROOFING ON STL PURLINS SYNTHETIC TURF, . I SEE FIELDS DWGS OUTLET, RC CLEF TIP Io TN oI I 4RD4l PIX1MNE CENIY�REv� I ON KM SEE ELEL. TYP 12, IYP I SHEET METAL SIDING TYP MAN DOOR, TYP OVERHEAD COILING PAVING UP AT DOOR, TYP FAST ELLZ'ATIW4 DOORS, TYP q 4 Q H49T EtF'yAT1p1 BUILDING ELEVATIONS AND FENCE DETAILS NOT TO SCALE SCHED 40 STL PIPE DS CONNECT TO SD. SEE FIELDS DWGS. PAINT, TYP OF 3 EA SIDE ELEC SERVICE & DISCONNECT, SE STL FRAMING BY MET BLDG MFR - SHT MET SIDING — MET SIDING DRIP FLASHING — BACKER ROD AND SEALANT IN 3/B' WIDE JOINT, TYP EA SIDE HMDOOR DOOR SOTTOM — THRESHOLD.SETIN I w 1 DOOR HEAD AND SILL F-3.7 NOT TO SCALE 24 GA PRE—INTED METAL SIDING 24 GA PRE -PAINTED METAL FLASHING CONTINUOUS 20 GA AL CLEAT, SECURE TO AL FRAMING AT 12'(ICJN I TO CMU AT 24' OCWI 11T X 1 1 EXPANSION ANCHOR METAL FRAMING BY METAL BLDG MFR 3 BOTTOM OF METAL SIDING AT SLAB F-3.7 NOT TO SCALE SEE 4IFIT FOR ADL 1' 2' INFORMAD'TION RAMP SLAB DOWN AT DOOR OVERHEAD DOOR AND SILL TOP OF CMU WAINSCOT NOT TO SCALE 24 GA MET SIDING MET FRAMING BY MET BLDG MFR WAINSCOT -SLAB EDGE NOT TO SCALE METAL SIDING l CRII' END FLASHING OVHD COILING DOOR ASSEMBLY OVERHEAD COILING DOORJAMB NOT TO SCALE ADDL ADDITIONAL H,NT HEIGHT BLDG BUILDING NOW HARDWARE B-O- BOTTOM OF NM HOLLOW MET CHAN CHANNEL INT INTERIOR CUR CLEAR MAX MAXIMUM CMU CONC MASONRY MET METAL UNIT MFR MANUFACTURER COL COLUMN MIN MINIMUM CONC CONCRETE NO M NOMINAL COORD COORDINATE GO ON CENTER DIET DETAIL OVHO OVERHEAD OR DOOR SCHED SCHEDULE DS DOWNSPOUT SD STORM GRAIN DWG DRAWING SF SQUARE FEET CA EACH SHT SHEET ELEC ELECTRICAL STL STEEL EO EQUAL STRUC STRUCTURAL EJTT EXTERIOR T.O. TOPOF GA SHIP GAUGE GROUP TYP W TYPICAL WIDTH REVISION fall! EDMONDS Is SCHUDL EDMONDS WOODWAY HIGH SCHOOL SYNTHETIC TURF CONVERSION �j HOGAN �4 iXY,R111 A DATE 5 4-2018 SCALE NTS DRAWN JON CHECIUD Clll 4p.�4 wT4wA 4IFunM ALTERNATE BID BATTING CAGE STRUCTURE SHEET F-3.7 Q Packet Pg. 273 7.1.j 12 rc-�]IaA]M o rc �AtE 2'C-(3)00)010 G i SPARE 2C-SPARE s2 a2 l �NP . 1 1i 1 Yin I 2*C-(6)A( )/la a ; : rC-SPNE 2'-106, ,(I)10C i I I r0->pARE I Al rc-(a)la wl)fla n I ,�T�C2 I Ar rC-M'NE !rc-bHe.(3HE(,>lla C l 1L rC-FARE POtll`-'BPYC ' A I i re-(s?l4[Qna e ' N ��z c-rN.eE I � 1 I 1 I I I I i I `—rF[4 ((1)110 0 4. D2 B1 �I rC-(s)la(11FI0 p ��`-��TC-{E11R(3)14p1Ta a i 2'C-�AIIE t � rfiSPAIE i F I 1 1 I µ�� I�71�R5 �� C•'(37►a5++fgillna>z MANE � 1 x.,, . • A I i I I I �y 2'C�BMo,(THIC 0 CAJUMCAL r--- n - 2'C-SPARE ' N W. P ALAL rc-(3)w.1. q(1)n0 0 2'G{3]EN,{a)14,(T]{10 0 �A i '--______ DI- ..YC-. ARErIr i CW x A �---------"{�" --------- --- -�" -- ; err 10-NEONDA" Gm Stantec GENERAL NOTES., F. rAAwTAN AND iaOTECT IYL ETOSFIW UTIEINs 1:bi1RNX10I[ m RtOYLY E170ATT PRCR W 1Nr ETGVAIEN PR1CR ro STAAINC COF %FALnK CONTRACTOR MWL CALL'CNE-0W FOR UK" LOGAO15 FLAG NOTES: ME DTLdbNff OMIT w PONE PER RE FEGILIEMENTT. BAOIF►L AND XESRtE 910CbLK POLE AND FLOODLIGHT SCHEDULE POE I 1HOTr FLO01N7DS MM15 Al 70' 4 1 A2 7C 4 1 n NO T 1 aY SD 7 1 a m 4 1 C2 7C 4 1 D, 7T 4 1 D2 70' 4 1 TI 5D 2 a T2 5C 2 D T3 50' 4 a T4 5W 4 O 75 SEf 4 0 To Sa 4 0 T7 w 2 O Ie so' 2 a -T 6! o LEGEND: b, 9i m LED FIAMUP1T, F007E OTHER. Iism 90 VOIJ MELDED LLD UPUGIT, REMOTE M OL 075W. 1110 VOLT (q ETESRNO UNDERGROUND RAMWAY ® IDIUN0 ANICHCR Box ® OCNGINN BOX A OEDCASTIE NN ETH STEEL FUTE BOLT DOWN W. ® AWTION BOX N, CLDCASIIE KM NTH STEM FUZE O0.T DON! U0. e-ea-ir smmDARY HANcHOE PEN RID RFAUF oar. 4Tl � FS R om• 12aETH . Fi0 IWAIN ]WHOOP COMER MOST CA R£ LIIRED MINIMUM INITIAL LIGHT NG LEVE somfrwMALL AVERAGE TC 30 MN YApINNMpuUM• 20 MA F 6 VAVIANOI: 0.23 MAX DIMMING REQUIRED TO 3aFT-C (PRAcnCE) DNMNO REQUIRED TO 20FT-C (CLEAN-UP) BA4DNL INFIELD AVERAGE FC: 50 MN MALOANMfTIFWM: 20 MAX COLTIICGNT OF VARIAIMN: 0.17 MAX BAMDAIL OUTFIELD AVERAGE FG 30 MN MANWAMINNUM: 25 MAX OOEFFIW(T OF MATCH: 0.21 MAX TENNIS AVENGE FC 50 NM MARPNV111k,Cu 20 MAX DYTRO9.7 OF YWANO/ 0.17 MAX APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDMONDS DATE: BY: REVISION DATE SCIi®L 111s IHIL.'7' EDMONDS v WOODWAY SYNTHETIC TURF CONVERSION V d L r C cn O O t V cn DA HOGAN27, 3 O to aLAL O E NORTH CL D60, d .O SCALE: 1"= 30' L ME 2-26-201B SCALE 1.30' DRAWN DRN r CHECKED CBF ELECTRICAL SITE Q PLAN SHEET E1.1 Packet Pg. 274 FLAG NOTES! >-wma a Lkvmim =- POLE m W.D1V-- SH497VPAL C+CA1fiIdAS FROM A UGEn3@0 SIRUCI:DH, Dwl&'{q REGISTERED N THE STATE OF'YA9R7CIW. CALCULATION TO INCLUDE WHO ND SEISMIC LOADS PER IBC GDIE SUBMIT WITH MANIFACREER SHOP DRAWINGS DURING SDYTTAL PHASE OF PRUECT. MATCH DIM GRADE ®OOOIDNAIE LOCATION OF BRACET NUN POLE MAMAAC URFR R:>IEFTR TO STRUCTURAL MORNINGS FOR FOUNDATION DEM. 0---4CVCF TKO 2• CONDUITS UP FLOOCIINf POLE MUD DUNCAN TO AQ, W UNCIIN BON. ® FLOODLIGHT MNNUFACIURFR FRONDED LIGHTING CONTROLLER �CEU'Ca+AA Ln:AnM a CONDUIT AND RECEPTACLES WITH LED SHIELDED FLODDUCH13 ARD BRAOU ASSEMBLY GALVAM® STEEL POLE AREA LINT LED UPLIGIF lr-r IG-r R5� 35' RpIO'E CfI1EA ENCLOSURES FORM COAT FINISH. lO UNDERGROUND DIDON BOA K� FOE FOUNDATION BY STRUCTURAL PRE -CAST CONC ETE BASE J000 CS o0 IRS MIN. 41 FiOODLI HT POLE DETAIL_ E-2.1 - Stantec CASE RON FS BON DOM ALAVATW PHOTOCELL RID STRIP 1071 PROWE �{ OIMM W METAL CA9QIED AND SCIREDIDI VENT METERED tW a IDT1W SECTOR IPAxa LINTER PER SEB lO�LUIV M 4Y 100 YCR 000 00❑ LIGHTING r TIPN:AL CNTACTURS e•+a'-Tono'AYF r 21• Comm ]CDC P1 NOOBNG CONDUITS TGONG CONONIS�■Y Ap yyMKFpIp rMC-10AD YFF W t/0 BARE FRONT NEW SIDE NEW zT] ELECTRICAL PEDESTAL DETAIL E-V EN FRONT � s BP INB CAGERE E ACLE MOUNT G E AIL E-20 PIMD HNCE ROOK TO Tp w TDR USF 6IE16PTAL1F5 - BIV AND m STIE.— Is FM SI"E MFDCO. N EQUAL PIANO HINGE FLOOR TO TIP UP FOR USE OF RECEPTACLES SIDE FRONT �e 6ACKSTOP POWER SOX DETAIL E-20 APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDMONDS DATE: BY: CRY ENGINEERING OMSgN REVISION DATE EDMONDS Is SCH®L D IS I R IC I EDMONDS WOODWAY SYNTHETIC TURF CONVERSION K&T DA HOGAN 1-4 nTu RIeAy �' pp NORTH I� 0 30' 60' SCALE: 1"= 30' DATE 2-2F2018 SURE r.301 DRAWN DRN CHECKED CBF ELECTRICAL DETAILS SHEET E2.1 a Packet Pg. 275 7.1.j 11 FLAG NOTES: D�> X)OC 110Y. 10 COMM POW OO 2A-1 �'IGHTiNG CONTROL LOGIC E 20 1BOV, 3r POKER GCf 1A-1,3,y A � l lit POE AI,AYILB2 BS CAPE /BOY. 30 POW CKT IA-0.7.7 ARE/1 I1C1115 Lc-1 LIGw maim r 3m LC-E IIGI11N0 CONTACTOR 3P BOA A 1 _HW SWOL SWARE 0 BOO WES 0 1'OIE uars O RELAY IO }I."ylx Nw Nrptr 3R 120/2W8 k6w " 600A Mal"CB Type: Panelhoard lu."pc 5udace M"u"led 42,000AIC p wl' %rask wo L1TITn .VA LVad ItA A C :B Load Descriotion H i tw.01 MLI RI Bl �• 1 a 12MV3 CB 307L hil Tennis C"urss-North 2 3 PULelAL 1k l z 3O7 IrnnkC ft moth Bf . ...---. .-- x .-..... ...10�pace .,•C¢wl1. Nu"h B A er 1 ! [9 x 1 r51 11 a[nOn.Nldle■ ••-,PPIrIF}42 4( .•—•� -- 1 •----- --------Te"nislV .rtMiddle 10 11 pWulA;■i A, % — Ia+i.wkC— MddL LZ13 D Itl rldn❑ 01 1. M/3 CB z 3N3 eArenMl[dwH• In NmlosCl10 1A ■ -----Lennis Courts Sown 16 F'od—c101 - -• -- >< •----- -------Tenn is Courts 5outh 1B$1 L. ht W I. N 3.6 B67 Sr x 3L43 LBAu hxx i0 41ftie C2ul } a TS It •---- ---------U II h[s 24 1z tV1 e 26 IVI 7A3 30 SS O r ■ v1 ae 32 G S i W1 a p 34 6 R71 R WI m rT R 1 1 A x 30/2 CBI hlii AreaLi his 40 n Ivi x. A.ra wJ r..: Mired Cllk AhllW'Lv+iW ❑Law+aedr nW11WRVA "AfIxoG rile V PHA PKII IPRC - Circuit Bleaker Code 6=GFCI H=HID Rated S-%W.A Trip C=HACR Rated D•SwilchinRDnly H=5ee Nate A1 2]60 ]&Olk 1A fA 11W11 llrm. InnFl Lam A„A Are .,d Hs In WAne—An NKNOJls IIFCfeer l•nm li%hhne ""3 E 1R7 4411 73j • SIVA us] M MAI in 2V: 5 Stantec CIOBFT YRkICL m UTILITY MAU OILNC IIE1Eir10 ,�� L4'C-W/t �i FOOTBALL FIELD ONE•LIN,E i31AGRAM E-21 APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDMONDS Dr.rl BY: iH.HI'ilis¢ RE3AS10h! SMTE 1A)Mi NDS Is SCH®L D I S T R I C T EDMONDS WOODWAY SYNTHETIC TURF CONVERSION Ir-rl DA HOGAN rry (t NORTH D 30' 69 SCALE: 1"= 30' DATE 2-2 200 SCALE r' 30 DRAWN DNN CHECKED CRF xr Qlose ELECTRICAL DETAILS SHEET E2.2 Packet Pg. 276 7.1.j Stantec ELECTRICAL Sl`- FLAN -1DRID srx[xs fts'C�m Q � .iT h, rscw.uwc: � O 15 30 OO m 1 N , yal'--v!> rw It IINN—aIwit V oNw $Im 1 kKh MAR W Plot b MWO4 GENERAL NOTES: 1. NAWAN AND PROTECT ALL DORM UMOfMM URITES CQ1IRACTCR TO LOCAIE PRO m ANY EXCAVATION. PRIOR TO STAATINO CCII9W=TICK CONIRACTOR 91NL CALL-M-CALLS FON UTILITY LOCATIONS. SHEET FG DEW ERSTN6 IERR AND LOAD MITER. OETD SECCIDW IFY W T AID OONRC TS BAOI m PINE CMNM E vm 91OIIaN91 P1D. ® SAWK AND 1119101E BETE MEN1X PANEL DaD gWOM OMMU Dmw sawadiw AND 13'DOWEGT To TE I�OGITm. sXIIACE A!D s1aE OHM $011000- m 1O PROt£CT fRow tlm E mD E7O5Tm 9017'ORI WES AND FOONDATM LEGEND-' - - E1351" RACLYRT LlIDETcm m REVISION DATE EDMONDS Is SCH®L 0 I M T R I C T EDMONDS WOODWAY SYNTHETIC TURF CONVERSION DA HOGAN rolA,. NORTH D 30' 60' SCALE: 1"= 30' DATE 2-36-2018 SCALE r-30 DRAWN DRN CHECKED CBE ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN - DEMO SHEET E1.0 a Packet Pg. 277 7.1.j �� rC-(e)NdIHe cRM ` ------- �ro-sPAE zo-SPARE Bc -ti •. r0-TPAE �i� ---" D �z•0-SPINE --- kr 9z ,, Lre AMe :_--•:-.•VVrA2 rr-mAaE ,, ; I ' FFp '• "� I i w E T3 �j, ppp� Tel - G�y'T4 i I ', `D ^ `----- LJ/Cc-(s1F9I)FG c Q' 3/4ro-(2)010.(I)Ila El. irrz.a(e)A(z)IIL(,)F c ; 5 z -WAR ! rC-SPATE ! AT 1 � C2 I f� ro-2PAEE 7•C-SPA[ D zwSPARE rr G 4 ro-SP,At a D2 i ' Sim 2•C-(ejR,(1)�e D z•o-sPAIE i 2-c-(e)/e(2)/e.(1)F6 c ; ' i 3•F(15)µ.(4)AI(I)jIO C (7)rFSPAE t ro-SPAE� T1e� sc�1P)/F(eHe(1)p c� 7 L rC-SPAR •• ,� —rC-SPAR I YF•..M I LIB' -------- ' - �-'rC-wlAlfl)pc i r-"-'LF�-ELELTNPR � __•••• YC-9PAIi i 1 F FEDWAL J/4•CjY�l0.(I�10 C rC l%)/L(z>aE(I)p c Ye (P1N(EH4(I]A G X 0 S°A E J MP Dl ,��----------I�- ra�AE -- -njQ-_- -------`- --'___� �• J/4'c-(z)R0.(011B c 71 i--- ----------- CC-(7)/S5OKUIL-gCQDMY St .uc EI.ER SITE PLAN D Is m e0 BD a D - V kd� pD1140 Fnl I! enarm»1Bt 1. VUIN th" I Wh th4A 6w plot 1. n&.& GENERAL NOTES: 1. .UM` OR a0X UXATI N5 AID CWOUIi OMW ARE SU"AIC IWO AWTOP BOXES 'IIFH PAVOW E065. CONDUIT RODU4G 94A71 AM IREM 9111Fi 01DUT AID JNCIIK'1 00% LAYGR RAN 10 04011m PRIOR io F6iALA90N. 2. NANTAM AN PR = ALL OXM C L" EIIOWAII, UTILITIES. WV0T1L70R W PROVIDE =AA PW TO MY EIICAVATICK PRIOR TO STARID CONSDNICTIU4 DONIR%= S KIL M •pI -w FOR UTILITY LIWOIA J. ALL SPATE/WPTY CONOUR TO BE PROVIDED TITH NYLON PULL MFEM 4. ALL VAULTS AND COIUUNTS IRE SHOW N AFPFDMMATE LOCAOKIi VERIFY LOCA1104 OF PROPERTY LINE, EASEMENTS AND LIDIIFES PRIM TO PLACEMENT. S AL CONDUITS U ENOTHS ARE APPRWMIATE REFER TO CEVl FOR OWT LENGTHS. G. TO MMWZE CONFLICTS EDTADETATE VAULT AD COMUII LOCAI11E5 ARI OTfR SITE UTILITIES PRIOR TO NSTAlA11U1 WAIST LOCAICK DUPING AS IEOIATED. MAINTAIN SPECIFIED MINIMUM COVER DEPIHS FOR CONCIIUS AND VALM 7. CA! ALL VNM COIDUNPS. TOM *)FMFS ATE CAPPED MAIN t=T0 KIN AN BL TWA MAW R. FLAG NOTES: p ROUIE SECONDARY FAIDWT w POE PID PUG IiM E1FDIT5. WOVE ON PEST FACE w POLL DAUOEL AD FES,7E SDMxx OOORWTE %TN PUG. INSTALL SALVAGED SOMOTRM P SCHEDULEOLE AND FLOODLIGHT �000 0000 >0000 0000 o�o�ilo olo©o 0000 ��000 0000 001©0 ooao LEGEND: p SHEIDED LED FLOODLIGHT, FUOIE DIVER 115M 410 VOLT D. 9E1DE0 DID UPUINT, REMOTE DRIVER 6751E 400 VOLT MEWS, LNDEY00i D RwEUY ® ERsim AINCT1oN Box ® AWITON BOX 1, OLDCASILL NSB WITH STEEL PLATE BOLT DOWN LID. ® AKTM BOX N RMAISHE FM KIN STEEL FLAFE DOLT WO UR V❑ C-8-K4'-r SECONDARY HADHUC PER PUD RE0110®E71TS PPIk DUPLEX REiMPTApE, 12DV, GFU WITH VGTHOWROOF COVER AND CAST ROE FS = REgUl RED MINIMUM INITIAL LIGEIING EV �GUd J0 MN AVERAGE Fsksmu G�G 50 MN YACiRW IF iVI 20 MAX 20 MAX OOET,H>ElE {T VA6ATQT: I' MAX =MW OF VARIATION: 0.17 MAX tXI0010 REA1RED ,O MFT-C (PRACTICE) TA SEBALL WEIEID DNIMEO P GURIM TO 20PT-C (UfIA-UN) AVERAGE MAMMMUI=T OF Ill 30 Mll YAf DCET%ATION E21 YAX TERMS AVERAGE Fill 50 DIN mmum/IWODIF. LEI MAX COEFF1OI1/T OF VAIAIM 0.17 MAX REVISION DATE EDMONDS ts SCHWL 1)1S I HILT EDMONDS WOODWAY SYNTHETIC TURF CONVERSION NORTH O� SCALE: 1"= 30' DATE 2-26-2016 SCALE 1"•3T DRAWN ORN CHECKED CBF . p,.I ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN SHEET E1.1 Packet Pg. 278 FLAG NOTES: D urn" Or myANTFD on POE TD P"a SWUCIINMIL CACVLAOSNS FROM A LRO$NAD SDNICRNE CNONEEA IEGSEERED N THE STATE OF WASHINGTO. CALCULATION TO INCLUDE WHO AND STSlC LOADS PER IBC 2012. SUBMIT WIN MANUFACTURER SHOP DRAWINGS DRAM SUBMITTAL PHASE OF FRO.ECT. MATCH EDISINO GRADE ® COOIONAIE LOCATION OF BRWOET WITH POE NNNFACNRER FUR TO STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS FOR FOUNDA11ON DEMON. ®PHOVICE TWO r CODOTS UP ftooOlalT POE EXTEND CODOT TO ADAICflR JRNCIION BOX ®GOORQNAf[ LDCATIOA CF C=LRT AD RECEPTACLES WIN E2xam PRIOR TO RIM. [V> W TO COOK /E1LTR ILSZE11T SCCREDONM RID SHE1DED FLOOOUGNTS AND BRACKET ASSEMBLY GAL4AIIE➢ STEEL PO-E�F AREA LIGHT RID UPLIGHT �--+ 1 W. 0 OFLOODLIGHT POLE DETAIL E-21 F rStantec 1 IEIESNG SECRDN PER U1UTY HOOT A"10 PHOTOCELL LLD SRw WITS Awoce �_- DD' EWAUED METAL CASIEIED AND PANEL 1 UOITEIG 20(i06V Nl. 4W XD IIL9 DDD DDD UOITNG CCNTACFORS SCREENED YDNT 7 .QP i HDi1aM E µ Irw-IOAO wF 2r N�'J/4A10' QICUID ROD 1 CONWIIS CUTD�(G AT EACH CORNER COPS FRONT VIEW SIDE MEW ( ELECTRICAL PEDESTAL DETAIL EV21 CAS FS 1 9A rrnz 1'ue NLIA 1-71 nD'a Iia�. CAST ROI FS BOX Em FRONT (I)BATTING CAGE RECEPTACLE MOUNTING DETAIL E-21 r 3000 PS WIN. To W F 42' --+Ir— 21 i 11 r EXSING 900MAH1 lg J YER 'Y JXTH OF SRPPORT BEAMS TO ACCONT FOR RF . in2X2O OFFERING GRACE ELEVATORS SWAT 0,0 a AND HEIGHT ABOVE OUTFIELD FENCEeNAn(. 17 MN. IP20A IP HD EDISONG SAFETY SO. DISOOHECT PROVIDE 16' X S' X Ir COIOEIE PAO IIIIH JUNCTION BOX ON I' 9 X 9 9YF FREE ORANN9�LRAWL PETER To SRLCRML BACK�� DRAMMS' i! SCOREBOARD DETAIL tv ONE FENCE POST NASAL S2OT ETC SAO61OP IN NE NFOAO. OR EQUAL NANO HINGE FLOOR —� 10 TP LP FOR USE OF RECEPTACLES BAAC(STOP F TLCO)"T PCE FORNOAOCr SIDE FRONT i1BACKSTOP POWER Box DETAIL E-2.1 APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDMONDS (M rt BY: REVISION DATE EDMONDS ts SCH(IDL 1)1 STR LC'r EDMONDS WOODWAY SYNTHETIC TURF CONVERSION rx�Tr DA HOGAN N. Jr]D] f ORAL NORTH NORTH 30' 60` SCALE: 1"= 30' DOE 2-26-MR SCALE 1%3(r DRAWN DRN CHECKED CBF NN x Ozoi ELECTRICAL DETAILS SHEET E2.1 Q Packet Pg. 279 h 12OV, 10 CONTROL PONER 20BIC S9 Pm 208N Df POWER CKT M- A w 2R-145 A UR 2R-7,0.11 ` 1 APp� 1 1 IU2 EPENES !P CABEiT SERNCO v 0 TO 111111TV vu.3P 0ia1 mv� J P(LES M,IT� A I ' C) O POLES POLES PAHR AA MUM P� ml[BXQ 77/yQY 2 PUSS 7 M CIA1 A O a 2 :k16R aacT 21�41 A2 DUES 2 ✓^ �` 1 Ci.D2 O A Q opts - Ire 0 aa4Es _ Ipp.[ PQ� A 2 VMS OUNT moss WU1Er Q FOOTBALL FIELD ONE -LINE DIAGRAM NORTH 1EHIRS 20B'E lip Iglpl xneu, >f POMR � E�_ Q U[r 71t^1A,TB,16 CIIT W-MA24 POLO MOUE TENNISA o IN 1ES -awn �� TETrts CQusP BRTLM9 M POLES } SU1TH TUNS A M. dA P07Elt 2Q01t 70 POW O %r 2R- off 2%-+40 UPIlOHTS A 2 I %IQ O FARE AREA !1GRS d D I I LEGEND: SPATE A O LC-1 LIGHTING CONTACIU{, 7P-zW u 12� 1dU{ANC CONIACNR ;P-i0A A SWITCH, SQUARE D 9001 SERIES _HDA o I POLE 1WH15 p FRAY 1a r- 1NL ��NUNNLY OPEN WNTACIOR 101 "0 O PHOTO= LIGHTING CONTROLLER BYPASS SWITCH OD �� IGHTING CONTROL LOGIC -10, E-Z2 APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDMONDS []z ELECTRICAL PANEL SCHEDULES E-U DATE: Stantec BY: CRY FNGIN�NNG DM6pN !lyPllr 2R ]20/208V 3P11 AM1 600A Main CD Type: Panelboard 1la ally Surface Moun[ed 42,OODAIC K I� IMu+ m. loaa in 4,161c 06 IP>D r>rw: nn It L,eh,nel'e nnl,m kYA CN :f aa1T [n li mr rorurnrwnsl,alh z 9 vceRfnl. el . x ••lrnnn [om<u-aeNn . y v�ea, u, e1 A % ---[rMaa[wln honA 6 it L hD+ vo'nnz e7 • CV] CB x l m 11 a In�lsCowls-1AtlaM1 f % -......... 1.1a, T.l[wm-wane]o 11n7.IV% rlwltrz+P't [Q1 in lTx)-trqr1CB•]y'lCDu t!H t !4 12% .-.nu1n C7. fa7 1 % 1 7t n x.A o as % 1 s aT r a 1111 A fVL a rw :e .79 +wt<e 6 fYl N NS 9 3Q 171 d oil v 1 [l O1 n.FeCl ry�rlM1 Fenrnlirltl Y Id 0 1 % 7N1 CO O11 Xexr ICenlrnl TeMlF rl[IO if 11 0 ! % 7N1 Ce D] Reee ISeVln lelv�F F�vld 34 31 a 4aehaM of 2D11 [n 1( ! CB O Arlrpl elll•e [ � m la.F kmr6Wld • JOf2 C9 0017 % SNt CM I II a Areas hte Til IAl yprleGynl � .. -. — I --Alral TK al Na flEfvtrd CFlf MuYrd•falfLq fxff MP,Fedr rennecTed RVA JQ1tli� �I Ae 4.iidWLKIAlT7Qly06fi110Kufnl$'iadj'Er.rliL I nNAK ANB 7FfC 'Cwr Wlfnaivf Ceh (i-GFCI H=HIDPa[etl ta)l,Du1 TnD C=HACP RaIed p•6witching Dury p=See Note A•uU :!].2A 79.W 7dW i lldvf Mm flew* Da [e.r KVA nlr n.ma�.Lra.l rr INA aEm. .N[[rynd■ r•rz 1..1 A.n;.. :lpnu; el.w x1WM al oo zzs xlzsw ra] N<rPl 1Z6 IOKVA@]IX%, resIQ SOR6 12R 3x10�6 xi71. ldl Amar ds71 zn REVISION DATEIs EllMON U5 SCHabL Ultil RIC"I" EDMONDS WOODWAY SYNTHETIC TURF CONVERSION Ir ri DA, HOGAN dlw �QNAL NORTH u 70' 6D SCAA� 1" = 30 DATE 2-26-2018 SCALE 17.301 p44WN ORN CHECKED CBF ELECTRICAL DETAILS SHEET E2.2 a Packet Pg. 280 p f.o p p p f.0 p f.0 f.o R.0 p �.o #0 f.o f.0 p -P.2 f.4 �.5 p #5 f4 �z R.1 p p #0 �.o p #0 p #0 p p R.0 p #0 p p p �.2 �7 4.9 p +1.4 +1.o 4.7 �.6 �.1 �-o ,.0 f1.0 p p #0 f.0 p �.o p R.1 R1.1 0.1 R.0 p p R.4 1.4 #2 P.7 fl.4 P.0 p 4.1 p R.1 T4 V T2 #1.0 p f.0 T.0 p p �.1 T.2 p 4.2 4.2 #5 �.5 f5 f7 1.4 p +1&6 +5&6 +958 +99.0 +1.2 4.5 �.J p ..0 T.0 #0 p �.2 p 4.4 +7.3 f.9 #o.7 42.5 47.2 46.2 442 4.0 p +3.9 +w.t T.2 po ;57.4 �2.1 4.6 �.5 01 82Z A2 0.0 0.0 0.0 111 J.4 0.5 I4.4 39.1 2&0 29.3 +11.4 +42.0 f38.7 f16.9 +37.5 +HI.7 23.3 f70.7 +59.0 +52.6 +55.2 22.8 1.7 -0.5 02 POLE AND FLOODLIGHT SCHEDULE �Om ©moo 0000 00010 ol000 I0000 ololloo moon ■arv�o ooto�t� 0000 I0000 oo©o 00©0 LEGEND., 0 P.0 I.0 T.3 +4.4 F2.8 ;9.3 17.1 f1.7 +42.0 I5-4 P2 10.9 4.7 �.6 R.2 C SAIUB UM FLOWAR. FIEWO B DPoVM 115M 4s5 VOLT fu +2.9 +13.8 +i6.1 +98.6 +52.5 +92.2 +54.8 p,�3.4 9 SRmm LED UPUGHT, REMOTE MYEII, VW 490 VOLT T3 LLLLLLpppppp T4 o FLoauwT PME P.0 po p �.2 1.5 +W2 49.6 +15.8 +11.3 ;&2 +14.1 +44.1 +58.2 +58.1 f51.3 �2.7 +19.3 +41.5 +w.8 +52.4 f.0 ;6.9 4.9 �.6 f2 REWIRED MINIMUM INITIAL LIGHTING LEVELS AYMAGE FC: 30 WIN �0 -p.o #0 p 44.7 +17.2 +13.8 +19.7 +11.76.2 +i0.7 +W.S +I6.7 +5J.8 +58.4 +SJ.2 +W.S +57.7 +SJ.O +56.6 �9.7 �,.9 �.51.1 MAMNW/MAM01k 2.0 MAX COUTICIENTOFVMIArCN: 0.25 MAX Al Om MC Tmv>M M -%FI-c (PRACTICE) C2 pwNo 9Eb1NF9 m xrrF.c (arw�IPJ �.0 p #0 T.7 j +19.7 +SB.7 +14.6 7.9 5.2 9.2 +15.5 3.9 4}9.1 +58.6 +59.6 +40.9 +4&3 +59.1 +SJ.6 +58.9 3.6 4.9�,1.6 ,�.2 BASEBALLIWED AVFAACE FC: 50 MIM MAAWUM/MIWY: 2.0 MAX COUTICIENT OF VARIATION: 0.17 MAX �.4 1.5 41.1 +i7.2 +3.3 �7.4 ;5.1 ;6.5 +V.6 +161 +41.3 +45.0 +48.3 44.1 TS 5 +55.9 +53.4 +96.5 2 6 TE 4.6 �.5 �.2 BASEBALL OumELn wAAMUMiAGE�lc zs MAX COUTIC MT OF VARATla 0.21 MAX p T.0 T.0 T.2 �.6 p,7 p.0 �&9 ;5.4 +55.6 �9.5 +13.2 +46.1 +56.3 +".0 f%4 4.3 f4 p TENNIS AVERAGE M 50 MIN +19.6 +25.1 +27.3 +10.6 f2.3 +28.6 MAAWW/MMJM; 2.o MAX CODTKFNT OF VARIATICH! 0,17 MAX Jos +18.2 +36.5 �4.3 110.0 �6.6 �6.3 47.0 �7.5 p.0 +10.0 +i5.2 +71.3 +10.1 P.6 +93.3 +SB.O P.5 p T.5 R.2 D2 FLAG NOTES: � YERIR PI L IN ES B1 AT M7G ADM GRACE" p �3 �4 +w.0 +11.6 +17.1 +14.6 +10.2 +10.1 +9.4 ;9.4 +12.2 +2.1 +10.5 ;7.2 +43.7 +57.2 +47.2 +5&3 49.7 4.6 p P.2 [C> HaamNTAL SPILL LIGHT CALaUTOW IN Foot-CMpES At A 10M1 CF $ ABW& QUM p T.7 +9.9 +12.3 +M.4 p +17.1 +34.7 +10.6 +12.2 +13 9 +36.4 +16.1 +14.1 P.4 n46 +54.1 +56.2 +54.8 i8 4.4 �.J �.1 1.0 I.O �.2 �17 +1.1 ;21 ;8.6 +30.5 +10.3 +7.6 +18.1 f7.3 f0.6 P.1 +40.7 +12.5 46.2 43 42.8 �7.5 41.6 +1.8 p �.2 p ,.o p p v 4.6 40.0 4&7 �3.7 Sao +14.5 +15.0 +36.1 +14.6 45.0 +13.7 ;2.1 T.8 �.1 4.6 1.4 4.5 4.0 T.4 p p D1tCr c1tiff P.0 �.o p.o p �.1 4.1 1.7 +5.4 +9.6 p 4.9 +9.0 40.2 41.2 t.7 +i.0 4.2 f4 �.4 �.4 �.4 p P.O <8Tw �.o p #0 p T.0 p f2 M2 p T.2 f2 +0.3 T4 �.2 p R.3 T.2 T.1 #1 p p p T.0 �.0 �.0 ry�11-17 �7 0&9 pop pm iv qtv olf 6F OT 10 pT 49 PSaa Aps giv opay gZAge �.o p -p.o p p �.o p �.o P.0 p 0.0 �.o p p R.6 6 #0 p p �.o p p �.o �,o �.o SP1LL LINT PLAN it Is w eo m amuFm D Hlm�wvoRMlt 1. oth. tllal FMI I h h It. tho Plat M ro8loed REVISION DAFE Is SCH®i 1) 1 S T R I L I EDMONDS WOODWAY SYNTHETICTURF CONVERSION K&T DA HUGAN fr 71AL NNO�ORTHH ppF- �1 0 30, Sw SCALE: 1"= 30' DATE 2-16-2018 SCALE 1%3e DRAWN DRN CHECKED CBF xr Qzo SPILL LIGHT PLAN SHEET ESPL.1 Q Packet Pg. 281