Loading...
2015-01-14 Planning Board PacketMEETING AGENDA PLANNING BOARD Council Chambers, Public Safety Complex 250 5th Avenue North January 14, 2015 7:00 PM 1. Call to Order and Roll Call 2. Reading / Approval of Minutes: Dec. 10, 2014 3. Announcement of Agenda 4. Audience Comments: (3 Minute Limit Per Person)* *Regarding matters not listed on the Agenda as Closed Record Review or as Public Hearings 5. Development Services Director Report to Planning Board 6. Public Hearings: (Public participation is welcome) 7. Unfinished Business: (No public participation) a. Discussion/Recommendation for General and Land Use Elements of 2015 Comprehensive Plan update. b. Discussion/Recommendation for Utilities Element of 2015 Comprehensive Plan update. 8. New Business: (No public participation) a. Edmonds Parks Recreation & Cultural Services Planning Board Report January 2015 9. Administrative Reports: Review Extended Agenda 10. Planning Board Chair Comments: 11. Planning Board Member Comments: 12. Adjournment PARKING AND MEETING ROOMS ARE ACCESSIBLE FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES (Contact the City Clerk at 771-0245 with 24 hours advance notice for special accommodations) AI-7401 Planning Board Agenda Meeting Date: 01/14/2015 Reading / Approval of Minutes: Dec. 10, 2014 Department: Initiated By: Planning Information Subject/Purpose Reading / Approval of Minutes: Dec. 10, 2014 Staff Recommendation It is recommended that the Planning Board review and approve the draft minutes. Previous Board Action N/A Narrative The draft minutes are attached. Attachments PB Draft minutes 12.10.14 2. CITY OF EDMONDS PLANNING BOARD MINUTES December 10, 2014 Chair Cloutier called the meeting of the Edmonds Planning Board to order at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, Public Safety Complex, 250 — 5t' Avenue North. BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT Todd Cloutier, Chair Neil Tibbott, Vice Chair Philip LoveDaniel Robles Valerie Stewart Mike Nelson Evan Zhao, Student Representative BOARD MEMBERS ABSENT Bill Ellis (excused) Careen Rubenkonig (excused) READING/APPROVAL OF MINUTES STAFF PRESENT Rob Chave, Planning Division Manager Karin Noyes, Recorder VICE CHAIR TIBBOTT MOVED THAT THE MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 BE APPROVED AS AMENDED. CHAIR CLOUTIER SECONDED THE MOTION, WHICH CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. ANNOUNCEMENT OF AGENDA The agenda was accepted as presented. AUDIENCE COMMENTS There was no one in the audience. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIERCTOR REPORT TO PLANNING BOARD Mr. Chave referred the Board to the Development Services Director's written report dated December 5, 2014. He particularly noted the Building Division's report that permit activity in 2014 has been very good. Board Member Stewart expressed concern that very few of the new permits were for multi -family housing units. Although infill single-family residential development is important, it will not strike the balance needed for the City to meet its growth targets. The City must continue to focus on ways to enable more multi -family residential development. Mr. Chave noted that permits were issued for one significant mixed -use project at the post office site, which includes quite a number of multi -family residential units. Board Member Stewart suggested that the statistics need to be broadened to identify the number of residential units created in the mixed -use projects. Chair Cloutier reminded the Board that these numbers are part of the proposed matrix for measuring the effectiveness of the housing element. Mr. Chave agreed that it is possible to track the number of residential units that are constructed as part of mixed -use projects, and these numbers could be added to the Building Division's next report. Board Member Lovell referred to the section in the report related to the Development Code Update and advised that he is familiar with Makers, the firm the City selected to assist with the update. They were the lead architectural firm that assisted the Port in preparing the Harbor Square Master Plan. They are a capable organization and possess the software that was utilized to create the view corridor analysis that accompanied the Harbor Square Master Plan. In addition, they are well known throughout the Puget Sound region. Mr. Chave added that Makers also has significant experience working with codes and design standards. In addition, they assisted the City in creating the 1984 Downtown Plan, which was well received and used for a long time. Board Member Lovell asked if the bulleted list of topics to be covered as part of the Development Code Update is intended to identify priorities. If so, he suggested it would be appropriate to move the discussion regarding "definitions" to early in the update process. Mr. Chave agreed and advised that the list is not intended to show prioritization. Chair Cloutier requested an update regarding the Council's review of the Housing Element. Mr. Chave explained that each element of the Comprehensive Plan would be presented to the City Council for a public hearing and study session prior to the Planning Board conducting a public hearing and making a recommendation. CONTINUED DISCUSSION OF DRAFT GENERAL BACKGROUND SECTION AND DRAFT LAND USE ELEMENT Mr. Chave advised that this item concerns two different but somewhat related sections of the Comprehensive Plan: the General Background Section and the main Land Use Element. He referred the Board to the following attachments to the Staff Report: • Attachment 1 — Clean version of the General Background Section • Attachment 2 — Marked up version of the General Background Section showing edits • Attachment 3 — Clean version of the Land Use Element • Attachment 4 — Marked up version of the Land Use Element showing edits Mr. Chave explained that the marked up versions (Attachments 2 and 4) illustrate the work done thus far, including updates to the narratives and data and reformatting the goals and policies to be more consistent with the format used in the Sustainability Element. He emphasized that no significant changes have been proposed in terms of goals and policies. However, staff is proposing that language related to design be moved to the Design Element. Staff is also proposing an additional bullet in the Plan Context Section (Page 59 of Attachment 4) to emphasize the City's increased concern about conflicts and safety issues related to the interaction of ferry, rail, vehicular and pedestrian traffic. In the past, a lot of the discussion about ferry traffic and safe access over the tracks has focused specifically on the Edmonds Crossing Project. The proposed language will acknowledge that there may be something the City can do, aside from the Edmonds Crossing Project, to address these problems. In addition, a new Goal B was added to the Downtown/Waterfront Area Section (Page 61 of Attachment 4) to emphasize the need to plan for improvements to resolve transportation and safety conflicts in the downtown/waterfront area. Mr. Chave invited the Board Members to provide their comments and suggestions for change related to both the General Background Section and the Land Use Element. General Background Section Board Member Robles referred to the Economic Factors Section on Page 16 of Attachment 2 and expressed concern that the last paragraph uses "global recession" as a point of reference, without providing additional information about when the recession occurred and what conditions were like in the City before the recession. It also does not provide any direction for what should happen if another global recession were to occur. Mr. Chave suggested, and the Board concurred, that the term "global recession" should be eliminated from the language. Planning Board Minutes December 10, 2014 Page 2 Board Member Stewart referred to the Historical Development Section (Page 11 of Attachment 2) and recalled her previous recommendation that reference to "nomadic bands of Native Americans" should be eliminated. Mr. Chave said he plans to edit this section to incorporate Board Member Stewart's comments from the last meeting. Board Member Stewart referred to the graphs on Page 13 of Attachment 2 and asked the difference between the "Edmonds Area" and "City Population." Mr. Chave answered that census tracts are the only way to collect comparable decade data, and all of the census tracts that encompass Edmonds include Esperance. Board Member Stewart suggested that this information be referenced better so people have a clear understanding of what the differences are. Board Member Stewart referred to the chart at the top of Page 17 of Attachment 2 and asked what "WTU" stands for. Board Member Nelson answered that it stands for warehousing, transportation and utilities. Mr. Chave added that "FIRE" stands for finance, insurance and real estate. Board Member Stewart referred to the 3rd page from the bottom on Page 23 of Attachment 2, noting that the 2004 Comprehensive Plan update included numerous public workshops, open houses and televised work session both at the Planning Board and City Council level. She suggested the Board request that the City Council also televise public hearings for the 2015 update. She recalled Mr. Zhao's comment at the last meeting about the importance of televising public meetings. The Board agreed that televising the public hearings would be helpful. Mr. Chave pointed out that this language would be replaced with new language. Instead of providing language that relates to just one specific adoption process, the intent of the new language is to outline a general process that is applicable to all land use planning processes. Vice Chair Tibbott asked if the City has a definition for "single family." Mr. Chave answered that the City's current definition for "family" is "any number of related individuals or up to five unrelated individuals. That means that up to five unrelated individuals would be allowed to reside in a single-family home. Board Member Nelson said he appreciates the new language for the public process, which will be easy for the general public to understand. He also complimented staff for attempting to define all of the acronyms used throughout the Land Use Element. Land Use Element Board Member Lovell expressed concern that the Land Use Element repeatedly refers to the Edmonds Cross Project, which has no funding and is no longer a viable project. He suggested that it might be more appropriate to refer to a generic multi - modal transportation facility rather than specifically to the Edmonds Crossing Project. Mr. Chave recalled that a lot of federal funds went into the Edmonds Crossing Plan, and the City should be very careful about unilaterally abandoning the project because the Federal Government could ask for their money back. Although there is no funding for the Edmonds Crossing Project at this time, the concepts in the plan are still valid in some form or another. He acknowledged that there needs to be a realistic look at which of the concepts are viable to carry forward and whether they need to be configured differently. Again, he cautioned against eliminating the plan completely. Board Member Lovell questioned if there is something the Board could do to strengthen the multi -modal concept. He suggested it might be appropriate to emphasize shorter term solutions for resolving issues related to transportation and safety conflicts in the downtown/waterfront area. Mr. Chave said there is consensus at the local, regional and state level that there are still valuable concepts contained in the Edmonds Crossing Plan, but something needs to happen for things to move forward. However, he noted that reviewing the Edmonds Crossing Plan will require a significant effort and cannot be included in the update currently in progress. Board Member Lovell observed that there has been significant discussion in the community about the need to study potential solutions to crossing the railroad tracks and getting around the ferry cueing lanes. This is of particular concern given the anticipated increase in train traffic projected by 2030, which could end up isolating the waterfront area from the rest of the town for a significant period of time each day. Mr. Chave recalled that the Edmonds Crossing Project originated from a desire to address conflicts between ferries and cars. Safety concerns related to trains have come to the forefront in recent years. He noted that ferry traffic declined significantly between 2000 and 2010, which suggests that ferry traffic may be a less important issue to address than access over the railroad tracks. Board Member Nelson added that recent statistics from Planning Board Minutes December 10, 2014 Page 3 Washington State Ferries show that ferry traffic continued to decline over the past three years, and in 2014 there was an average of 599 fewer passengers each day than in 2013. Board Member Lovell agreed that it is important for the Land Use Element to emphasize that safe access over the railroad tracks is becoming more of an issue and the City needs to study the alternatives. Mr. Chave suggested it is important not to lose the term "Edmonds Crossing" but separate it from the original big project. Given the current limitations, recent changes, and other problems, revisiting and reconfiguring the plan in conjunction with state and regional partners would be appropriate to look for solutions to the current problems. This work should be done before a decision is made to abandon the project entirely. Board Member Robles referred to the section related to Population and Employment Capacity (Page 50 of Attachment 4) and asked if the City Council has taken the actions outlined in the second paragraph. Mr. Chave answered that the City Council is currently considering a draft Westgate Plan and they recently approved the Board's recommendation to remove restrictions on I' and 2ad floor residential development in the CG and CG2 zones along the Highway 99 Corridor. Board Member Robles again referred to the section related to Population and Employment Capacity (Page 52 of Attachment 4) and suggested that the last paragraph should not only highlight the measures that could be taken to encourage development, it should also talk about how the measures could be used to inform the process and revisit the language in the future. Mr. Chave noted that no performance measures have been included in the Land Use Element at this time. He invited the Board Members to share their thoughts on what appropriate performance measures might be. Board Member Lovell referred to draft language he sent via email to Commissioners to address the matter of sustainability and soft versus hard infrastructure. The Board indicated support for the draft language, and Mr. Chave suggested that it could be inserted into the 2nd paragraph on Page 52 of Attachment 4. Board Member Lovell commented that there have been ongoing discussions amongst the community and the City Council about potentially funding a study to look at solutions to the overall problems of ferry cuing and getting over the railroad tracks. While the Point Edwards solution would be great for SR-104 and eliminate the ferry cuing problem in downtown, it would not address the need for railroad crossings at Dayton and Main Streets. Perhaps a ramp that lands people on the downside of the waterfront is one alternative that could be studied. He agreed with Mr. Chave that the Edmonds Crossing terminology and information should not be eliminated from the Land Use Element, but it should be acknowledged that the certainty of the project is by no means determined at this time. Mr. Chave said staff will review Pages 68 and 69 of Attachment 4 and likely propose adjustments to the timeframe of long and short-term actions. Board Member Stewart suggested that addressing emergency access over the tracks should be identified in the Comprehensive Plan as a short-term goal. She noted that this issue was discussed at the last City Council meeting. Mr. Chave agreed but said the goal should be general rather than assume any certain conclusion. For example, "take steps to resolve safety and access problems that arise with the railroad." He noted that a general goal that identifies the problems is all that would be needed for the City to apply for state and federal grant funding. Board Member Lovell commented that, in his opinion, there is a lack of progress or process in the City at the moment with respect to moving forward with certain issues, particularly land use and redevelopment. There is a huge constituency who does not want change, yet the City must meet state and regional mandates that require it to accommodate more residents. While it is important to preserve the character of the City, it is also important to provide for reasonable growth and redevelopment. This message should be clearly stated in the Land Use Element so the public has a clear understanding of why certain land -use changes are being proposed. Vice Chair Tibbott suggested that perhaps the last paragraph on Page 50, which is based on certain assumptions such as encouraging mixed -use development at Westgate and Five Corners, would adequately address Board Member Lovell's concern. Boart Member Lovell agreed that this paragraph somewhat addresses his concern, but additional language could be added to emphasize the need to continue with this same strategy. Mr. Chave advised that the last paragraph on Page 48 also places an emphasis on mixed -use development, activity centers, etc. Perhaps this paragraph could be further expanded to make it clear that mixed -use development is one of the key underlying assumptions for meeting the City's growth targets. Planning Board Minutes December 10, 2014 Page 4 Board Member Lovell asked if it would be appropriate to reference the recently adopted Strategic Action Plan somewhere in the Land Use Element. Mr. Chave noted that the Strategic Action Plan is mentioned as an implementation tool in the Sustainability Element. He explained that the Strategic Action Plan is not intended to be a policy document. Instead, it serves as a link between the overall policy document (Comprehensive Plan) and the budget. He did not feel it would be necessary to mention the Strategic Action Plan in the Land Use Element, as well. Board Member Stewart reported that at last night's City Council Meeting there was a lot of discussion about the senior center becoming a community center, as well. She questioned if references to senior center, such as in Item 7 on Page 69 of Attachment 4, should be changed to senior center/community center. Chair Cloutier cautioned against anticipating a name change in the update. If the name of the facility is changed in the future, the Comprehensive Plan could be updated accordingly. The remainder of the Board concurred. Board Member Robles suggested that additional language be added on Page 82 of Attachment 4 to address concerns raised about the need for better buffers between the residential and commercial development along Highway 99. While a business along the Highway 99 Corridor may look pleasing from the front, business owners often dump unwanted items behind their buildings, creating an eyesore for adjacent residential neighbors. He suggested the language related to the Highway 99 Corridor should be more balanced to address the needs of both the commercial and residential property owners. Mr. Chave pointed out that this section actually refers to the Medical/Highway 99 Activity Center, which focuses on the hospital and high school. The Highway 99 Corridor is addressed starting on Page 86 of Attachment 4. He specifically noted that Items A.3, C.1 and D.1 help address the concern raised by Board Member Robles. Chair Cloutier pointed out that these items address the front side of commercial buildings along the Highway 99 Corridor as opposed to the transition area between the businesses and residential uses. Mr. Chave added that Item D.2.d on Page 89 calls for adequate buffering between lower intensity uses and residential neighborhoods. Chair Cloutier suggested that this policy should apply to the buffer area between higher intensity uses and residential neighborhoods, as well. Board Member Stewart referred to the second paragraph on Page 96 of Attachment 4, which references a 2004 overlay of the critical areas inventory. She asked if the overlay would be updated as part of the 2015 update. Mr. Chave explained that the language in this section explains that the 2004 Comprehensive Plan update changed a lot of RS-12 zoned properties to RS-10 because of the bright -line rule through the Growth Hearings Board requiring a certain density. Because this rule is no longer applicable, most of the language in this section will be eliminated. Board Member Stewart asked if the Best Available Science Report would be updated as part of the current update, and Mr. Chave answered affirmatively. Board Member Stewart referenced the chart on Page 97 of Attachment 4 and asked if the "single -family -resource" designation is intended to imply that the City is saving natural resources and critical areas by making large lots in that part of the City. Mr. Chave answered affirmatively. He said the intent was to be clearer in zoning and land -use mapping and descriptions as to why they have large -lot, single-family zones in the City. Board Member Stewart recalled the Board's previous discussion with staff that the Comprehensive Plan should avoid using specific measurements such as "15 feet" in Item A.6 on Page 110 of Attachment 4. Board Member Stewart suggested that the 3rd Paragraph on Page 111 of Attachment 4 should be changed to read, "Wildlife is a valuable natural resource that greatly enhances the aesthetic quality and well being of human life." Chair Cloutier said another option would be to simply remove the word "aesthetic." The Board concurred with Chair Cloutier's recommendation. Board Member Stewart referred to the 2nd to the last paragraph on Page 112 of Attachment 4 and suggested the last sentence be changed to reflect that noise can also affect quality of habitat and wildlife. She agreed to send draft language for staff to consider. Mr. Chave noted that a lot of the language in this section is old and needs to be updated. Vice Chair Tibbott asked if the Noise Section should include language related to unmanned vehicle and/or aircraft. Board Member Robles explained that these devices create more of a privacy issue than a noise issue. The modern drones for aerial surveillance are electric. Planning Board Minutes December 10, 2014 Page 5 Student Representative Zhau said he was excited to learn about the concept of the senior center being changed into more of a community center. He said he and his friends go to the beach a lot, and high school students also hang out near the senior center. It will be good to create more of a community space to serve all citizens of the City in this great location. INTRODUCTION OF UTILITIES ELEMENT AND RELATED ELEMENTS Mr. Chave referred the Board to the current Utilities and Capital Facilities Elements of the Comprehensive Plan (Attachment 1). He noted that the lst Paragraph makes reference to other plans for the sewer, water and stormwater systems. He reported that, at this time, staff is working to extrapolate all of the goals and policies contained in these individual plans so they can be called out to the Utilities Element. While this will add a few more pages, it will be helpful and necessary information. Staff will also consider policies for other utilities that do not have specific plans in place, such as solid waste. He invited the Board Members to offer their comments and suggestions as staff moves forward with the draft update. Chair Cloutier asked if fiber optics would be addressed as a separate utility. Mr. Chave answered that he is not sure it would be a separate utility, but it should be mentioned in the plan. Chair Cloutier noted that it was recently discussed as being regulated as a utility at the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) level. Board Member Lovell asked if Goals B.1, B.2, B.3 and C.1 on Page 101 of Attachment 1 are current enough to represent what is actually happening. Mr. Chave reported that the Public Works Department has been invited to review the Utilities Element and provide feedback to make it more current. He agreed that some of the language is dated. He noted that solid waste and recycling in Edmonds is unique because the City relies solely on independent carriers. Many jurisdictions actually contract with carriers because they feel they get a better deal for their residents. Board Member Lovell asked if it would be appropriate to include an additional goal that encourages recycling and reuse of materials when demolition or redevelopment occurs. Mr. Chave agreed that would be an appropriate goal to include in the Solid Waste Section, and it could be implemented via the Development Code. Board Member Stewart suggested that the lst Paragraph in Item A on Page 101 of Attachment 1 could be changed by replacing the word "efficient' with "sustainable." Chair Cloutier noted that the Solid Waste Section also needs to address composting and salvaging materials during demolition. Mr. Chave said staff would like the Board to consider whether or not it would be appropriate to also include a policy related to underground utilities. Board Member Lovell suggested that the need for public restrooms and the senior center should be specifically referenced in Goal F on Page 106 of Attachment 1. Mr. Chave pointed out that Goal F refers to "essential public facilities," which is a term of art in State Law and is not the same as "important public facilities. Essential Public Facilities include uses, such as prisons, that are difficult to site because the community by and large does not want them. The City must have a section in the Comprehensive Plan that talks about how to deal with these uses, and that is what this section attempts to do. It is not about important facilities such as restrooms, etc. NOMINATION/ELECTION OF 2015 BOARD POSITIONS BOARD MEMBER LOVELL NOMINATED BOARD MEMBER CLOUTIER TO SERVE AS CHAIR OF THE BOARD IN 2015. BOARD MEMBER NELSON SECONDED THE NOMINATION. BOARD MEMBER STEWART NOMINATED BOARD MEMBER TIBBOTT TO SERVE AS CHAIR OF THE BOARD IN 2015. BOARD MEMBER LOVELL SECONDED THE NOMINATION. AFTER A VOTE, THE BOARD ELECTED BOARD MEMBER TIBBOTT TO SERVE AS CHAIR OF THE BOARD IN 2015. BOARD MEMBER ROBLES NOMINATED BOARD MEMBER LOVELL TO SERVE AS VICE CHAIR OF THE BOARD IN 2015. BOARD MEMBER CLOUTIER SECONDED THE NOMINATION. Planning Board Minutes December 10, 2014 Page 6 BOARD MEMBER TIBBOTT NOMINATED BOARD MEMBER RUBENKONIG TO SERVE AS VICE CHAIR OF THE BOARD IN 2015. BOARD MEMBER ROBLES SECONDED THE NOMINATION. AFTER A VOTE, THE BOARD ELECTED BOARD MEMBER LOVELL TO SERVE AS VICE CHAIR OF THE BOARD IN 2015. REVIEW OF EXTENDED AGENDA Mr. Chave referred to the updated extended agenda, and noted that the discussion at most Board meetings over the next several months will focus on the Comprehensive Plan Update. He agreed to contact the Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services Director to confirm that she will present a quarterly Parks Report on January 14th Board Member Lovell asked when the Board would have its first hearing on the Comprehensive Plan Update. Mr. Chave answered that the first public hearing is scheduled for June I Oh. He reminded the Board that, as per the current process, the Board will have a study session on each element of the Comprehensive Plan, and then each element will be forwarded to the City Council for a public hearing and study session prior to hearings before the Planning Board. PLANNING BOARD CHAIR COMMENTS Chair Cloutier did not provide any comments during this portion of the meeting. PLANNING BOARD MEMBER COMMENTS The Board Members thanked Chair Cloutier and Vice Chair Tibbott for their leadership throughout 2014. Board Member Lovell reported on his attendance at the November 17"' Economic Development Commission meeting where there was a fairly substantial discussion about the Commission's role with respect to the Planning Board and City Council. It was suggested that the Commission should work more closely with the Planning Board, and some concern was expressed about the status of things that are and are not happening at the City Council level. They specifically discussed the future of the Commission and whether or not their recommendations provide a value to the City Council. The City Council members in attendance at the meeting assured them that they are a valuable asset to the City and they want their work to continue. Over the past year, the Commission had a good structure of subcommittees that worked on various issues they wanted to advance. This approach worked well and they were able to move a few items forward such as a recommendation to the Planning Board regarding the Westgate Plan. They expressed disappointment that the City Council has not taken final action on the plan, given the great amount of work by the Planning Board and Economic Development Commission. Vice Chair Tibbott reported that he recently wrote an article that was published in THE EDMONDS BEACON and www.mvedmondsnews.com titled, "The Future of Housing in Edmonds. " He said he intends to write at least two more articles on affordability and transportation in housing. He emphasized that in no way does he intended to represent the Board's thoughts on any particular issue. He said THE EDMONDS BEACON has invited him to write a monthly column, but he is concerned that it may create a conflict of interest given his current position on the Board. Chair Cloutier clarified that because the Board does not deal with quasi-judicial actions, Board Members can voice their opinion on anything they wish in any forum. However, they should be careful to make it clear that they do not represent the viewpoint of the Planning Board as a whole. As chair of the Board in 2015, Vice Chair Tibbott said he plans to continue with the quarter reports to the City Council. He noted that these reports represent a good opportunity to report to the media, as well. Vice Chair Tibbott announced that he has also been invited to participate on the SR-104 Corridor Study Advisory Group. Board Member Robles reported that he spoke last week at the "Future of Money" Conference. Board Member Stewart announced that she is working to organize a tour put on by Bill Phillips, who was a Chemistry Teacher at Edmonds High School in the 1970s when biologist John Cook, a college student at the time, led his students to do Planning Board Minutes December 10, 2014 Page 7 a study of the Edmonds Marsh. Mr. Phillips later became the Vice Principal of Edmonds Woodway High School. He also previously served for 17 years on the Edmonds Planning Board, during which time the City acquired a significant amount of park land and saved natural areas from development. Mr. Phillips will conduct a tour of the shoreline and share the City's history for acquiring waterfront lands. He also plans to conduct an additional tour of upland park space the Planning Board was instrumental in acquiring. She noted that several Edmonds Woodway High School students have been invited to attend, and Planning Board Members are invited, as well. She agreed to inform the Board of the specific date and time as soon as possible. Board Member Stewart thanked Mr. Zhao for accepting the responsibility of serving as the Student Representative on the Planning Board. Mr. Zhao said he is currently the Vice President of Edmonds Woodway High School's Environmental Group and he is seeking to contact a City representative to discuss opportunities for local crews to help with park cleanup. Board Member Stewart agreed to provide Mr. Zhao with the appropriate contact information for Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services staff. ADJOURNMENT The Board meeting was adjourned at 8:55 p.m. Planning Board Minutes December 10, 2014 Page 8 AI-7409 Planning Board Agenda Meeting Date: 01/14/2015 Development Services Director Report to Planning Board Staff Lead/Author: Shane Hope, Director Department: Planning Initiated By: Information Subject/Purpose Development Services Director Report to Planning Board Staff Recommendation Please review the report. Previous Board Action N/A Narrative Report is attached. Attachments Director Report 01.13.15 Blda Division Report Social Media Policy Social Media Guidelines 5. MEMORANDUM Date: January 9, 2015 To: Planning Board From: Shane Hope, Development Services Director Subject: Director Report Next Planning Board Meeting The Planning Board's next meeting is on January 14. Continuing the 2015 Comprehensive Plan update process, including review of a draft Utilities Element, will be a key subject. Videotaping of Planning Board Meetings Planning Board meetings will be videotaped (in a manner similar to how City Council meetings are now videotaped) for television viewers, starting very soon. This new public opportunity follows the City Council's appropriation as part of the 2015 budget. Comp Plan Open House —Feb. 25 The 2015 Comp Plan Update will be the subject of a public open house on February 25, Wednesday, from approximately 5 pm to 7 pm. This is a two-hour time period just ahead of a regular Planning Board meeting. The open house will provide information about the Comprehensive Plan update process —what's happened so far, what's next, and how people can be involved. Featured information will also include a separate but related project —the SR 104 Complete Streets Corridor Study. Record -Breaking Year for Development Projects 2014 was a very good year for projects being built in Edmonds. In fact, the valuation for projects built in 2014 (nearly $74.2 million) appears to be the highest total valuation ever! See the attached Building Division Report for more information. (Note: The Building Report does not cover engineering and land use permits/approvals, but is a good indicator of general development activity.) City Website and Social Media The City's website is in the process of being upgraded and updated. The new version will be easier to use and more robust, allowing lots of new information to be added without the website crashing. You can expect to see it later this month. As soon as possible after that, we will add a new "Comp Plan Update" webpage. ❑ A Facebook page is also being established for the City. It will provide information on various events and activities. Note: the page can be viewed by anyone but Planning Board members are asked to not post comments; more information about this will be provided later. The City Council recently adopted a social media policy. (See attachment for policy and guidelines.) Historic Preservation Calendar If you did not get a 2015 Historic Edmonds Calendar, produced by the Edmonds Historic Preservation Commission, you may still be able to get a copy from City Hall. The calendar has wonderful "old-time" photos. City Council Update ❑ The City Council adopted a budget that included $100,000 to begin a subarea planning process for the Highway 99 area. This effort would start in mid-2015. ❑ On January 13, the Council will discuss the draft Comprehensive Plan Housing Element, which was forwarded through the Planning Board process. ❑ January 6 marked the last Council meeting for Strom Peterson, now serving as a state legislator, and the election of a new Council President: Adrienne Fraley- Monillas. The elected President Pro -Tern is Kristiana Johnson. Community Calendar Upcoming community events include: ❑ Jan.: Edmonds Arts Commission Library Exhibit, runs through January 30t" located at the Edmonds Library. ❑ Jan. 22 - 23: FBC 201: Preparing a Form -Based Code: Placemaking, Edmonds, WA. For information www.formbasedcodes.org/courses-webinars ❑ Feb. 7: Daddy Daughter Dance at 6:30 — 8 pm at Edmonds Senior Center, contact Edmonds Park & Rec. at 425.771.0230 :i Feb. 7: Support the Edmonds Police Polar Bears as they take the Polar Plunge for Special Olympics of Washington State at Golden Gardens Park on Feb. 7th in Seattle! https://www.kintera.orci/faf/search/searchTeamPart.asp... City offices will be closed Monday, January 19 for Martin Luther King Jr. Day. Attachments: ❑ Building Division Report ❑ Social Media Policy ❑ Social Media Guidelines EDMONDS BUILDING DIVISION REPORT FOR MONTH OF DECEMBER 2014 NAME ADDRESS WORK KAUTZ ROUTE LLC KAUTZ ROUTE LLC KAUTZ ROUTE LLC KAUTZ ROUTE LLC KAUTZ ROUTE LLC BURNSTEAD CONSTRUCTION BURNSTEAD CONSTRUCTION 23230 EDMONDS WAY 23228 EDMONDS WAY 23226 EDMONDS WAY 23224 EDMONDS WAY 23222 EDMONDS WAY 23703 105TH PL W 23707 105TH Pl. W DUPLEX DUPLEX DUPLEX DUPLEX DUPLEX NEW SFR NEW SFR TYPE TOTAL FOR MONTH TOTAL FOR YEAR PERMITS VALUATION PERMITS VALUATION Single Family - New Duplex - New Apartment/Condo - New Commercial - New Mixed Use - Office/Condo 2 $634,837 46 $15,851,630 5 $1,828,717 7 $2,482,493 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 5 $36,707,117 0 $0 1 (43 units) $7,232,284 Single Family Add/Alter Apartment Add/Alter Commercial Add/Alter 9 $326,094 95 $4,154,515 2 $25,600 16 $204,660 8 $406,267 69 $5,422,501 Public Building - New Public Building Add/Alter Carport/Garage 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 1 $20,000 0 $0 10 $252,947 Demolition Mechanical/Plumbing Miscellaneous TOTAL 1 $0 19 $0 23/29 $0.00 245/353 $18,977 46 $971,942 429 $1,809,041 125 $4,193,457 1296 $74,156,165 L:\Building New Folder 2010\Reports (Permits &Inspections)\Permit Reports\2014 Permit Reports\DECEMBER 2014 Building Report.xlsx EDMONDS BUILDING DIVISION REPORT FOR DECEMBER 2014 BUILDING PERMIT FEES RECAP DECEMBER 2014 DECEMBER 2013 DECEMBER 2012 VALUATION $ $4,1931457 $10,638,103 $854,303 YEAR TO DATE $74,156,165 $37,334,392 $20,407,478 PERMIT FEES $ $52,893 $72,380 $15,909 YEAR TO DATE $657,005 $464,978 $329,591 REVIEW FEES $ $31,478 $51,681 $7,184 YEAR TO DATE $438,038 $249,351 $156,238 # OF PERMITS 125 92 81 YEAR TO DATE 1296 1361 1101 PLAN REVIEW FEES RECEIVED YEAR TO DATE PLAN REVIEW FEES TAKEN IN ON CURRENT APPLICATIONS FOR DECEMBER 1- 31ST NOT YET ISSUED) PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BUDGET PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EXPENDED YEAR TO DATE $438,038 $14,862 $92,000 $70,489 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PERCENTAGE USED 76.62% -� °V EDP 0 AI�d v � 18go 1��0 SOCIAL MEDIA USAGE POLICY Section Index: 1.0 Purpose 2.0 Policy 3.0 Related Documents 4.0 Definitions 5.0 Guidelines and Procedures 1.0 PURPOSE 1.1 Recognizing that Internet -based social media tools can provide opportunities for enhanced commu- nication with residents, the City of Edmonds departments may consider using these tools to reach a broader audience. This policy establishes guidelines for the use of such social media tools and sites. 1.2 This policy supplements Appendix A, Information Services Acceptable Use Policy, of the City's Per- sonnel policy. 1.3 This policy shall apply to all employees, officers, volunteers and contractors creating social media on behalf of the City, as defined herein. 1.4 This policy is initiated by City Administration. 1.5 The City electronic communications and technology resources are provided for the purpose of con- ducting City business. 2.0 POLICY 2.1 It is the policy of the City of Edmonds to allow use of social media in a manner that is consistent with the policies governing the use of the City's other communications and technological resources. City employees and officers are accountable for the form and substance of all the information they post or otherwise relay for City purposes using these forms of media. All employees and officers using social media for City purposes must maintain the highest standards of propriety and professionalism in their postings. 3.0 RELATED DOCUMENTS 3.1 Social Media Comments and Use Guidelines: Standards for public comments and usage of City social media sites. 3.2 Social Media Style Guide: Standards for the writing and design of social media. City of Edmonds Social Media Usage Policy Page Page 2 of 5 3.3 Social Media Usage Application Form: Mandatory form a department must use to authorize the de- partment's Social Media Content Coordinator to use social media. 4.0 DEFINITIONS 4.1 For the purpose of this policy, the following definitions apply: A. Social Media: Social media and Web 2.0 are umbrella terms that define the various activities that integrate technology, social interaction, and content creation. As used in this Policy, it co- vers usage of the Internet, Facebook, Twitter, Nixel, blogs, My Space, YouTube, Flickr and oth- er web tools as approved in the Social Media Style Guide. B. Content: Any text, metadata, QR codes, digital recordings, videos, graphics, photos and links on approved sites. C. PIO: Public Information Officer, either City employee or contracted professional, who manag- es the Social Media Style Guide, approves Social Media Usage Applications submitted by the departments' Social Media Content Coordinators, and monitors public comments on social media in accordance with these policies. D. Social Media Content Coordinator: Department representative responsible for managing the content of the social media sites used by any department. The Social Media Content Coordina- tor shall maintain, manage and post all content to Social Media, as well as monitor comments, in accordance with these policies. 5.0 GUIDELINES AND PROCEDURES 5.1 General This Policy has been drafted to facilitate a process by which City staff can disseminate information to the public in an efficient and effective manner. This policy shall work in conjunction with the related documents set forth in Section 3 above. Social media shall not be used by City staff other than the manner described herein. 5.2 Requests to Use Social Media A. Prior to requesting social media usage, departments should consider the time and effort needed to manage and maintain social media. Sites lose interest of their audiences when not updated regularly. As a rule of thumb social media sites should be monitored daily and updated at least once a week. B. The Role of the Social Media Content Coordinator. 1) If a department chooses to utilize social media, the department Director must ap- point a Social Media Content Coordinator to maintain and monitor social media con- tent originating and developed from within their department. 2) In compliance with sections 5.4 and 5.8, a department's Social Media Content Coor- dinator is responsible for regularly posting information, monitoring comments and saving content required under the Public Records Act. No other City employee with- City of Edmonds Social Media Usage Policy Page Page 3 of 5 in a department shall have access to post content on social media on behalf of the City. 3) In order to ensure compliance with their obligations, the Social Media Content Co- ordinator must complete Social Media Usage Training, as described in the Social Media Usage Policy, or receive a waiver from the PIO, prior to assuming this role. Directors are responsible for ensuring their Social Media Content Coordinator follow the procedures set forth in this Social Media Policy and the Social Media Style Guide. 4) In order to utilize social media on behalf of their department, the Social Media Con- tent Coordinator must complete a one-time Social Media Usage Application Form, or otherwise receive approval from the PIO. The application shall include (1) how the department intends to utilize the social media site; (2) a brief outline of antici- pated content; and (3) how the department will comply with retention and public disclosure obligations. C. Approved Social Media. Currently, the City has approved for potential use: Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, Flickr and Google+. The PIO shall provide a list of additional approved social media sites in the Social Media Style Guide. D. Retention of Passwords and log -ins. The PIO shall maintain a list of all City social media sites that are operating and the log -ins and passwords for those sites. Departments must inform the PIO if they intend to stop operating their social media sites. 5.3 Approval of social media sites and revocation of approval A. Before social media are created or used, the City Attorney or designee shall review the "Terms of Service" for each site. City Council approval of these Terms of Service may be required. B. Approval for use may be revoked if a Social Media Content Coordinator (1) fails to keep the site current; (2) fails to comply with posting approval process; (3) fails to comply with other requirements specified in the Social Media Style Guide; or (4) violates the City's standards of propriety or professionalism as determined by the Mayor or the Mayor's designee. 5.4 Obligations of Social Media Content Coordinator when Posting Content A. All content posted on social media sites by a Social Media Content Coordinator must conform with the procedures adopted by the PIO in the Social Media Style Guide or otherwise author- ized by the PIO. Generally, once the Social Media Content Coordinator submits a Social Media Usage Application to the PIO for approval on behalf of its department, the Social Media Con- tent Coordinator is authorized to manage content pursuant to the policies herein. B. A link to the Social Media Comments and Use Guidelines must be prominently displayed on any City -approved social media site. C. Social Media Content Coordinators shall not post or link to content that: 1. Violates copyright license agreements 2. Promotes or advertises any political campaign or ballot proposition 3. Can be used for or to promote any illegal activity City of Edmonds Social Media Usage Policy Page Page 4 of 5 4. Promotes or solicits for an outside organization or group unless authorized by the Mayor or the Mayor's designee 5. Promotes any non -City, commercial enterprise unless authorized by the Mayor or the PIO 6. Contains libelous or slanderous material 7. Violates an individual's right to privacy 8. Is unrelated to the mission of the City 9. Is unrelated to purposes specified in department's application for use of social media or amendments to that application 10. Violates the City's standards of propriety or professionalism as determined by the Mayor or the Mayor's designee. 11. Includes close-up or portrait photographs or videos of individuals taken without their permission. (Crowd photographs or videos do not require individuals' permission.) D. The most appropriate uses of City social media sites are: (1) for time -sensitive and emergency information; and (2) as a communications/promotional/marketing tool which increases the City's ability to broadcast its message to the widest possible audience. E. Each Department's Social Media Content Coordinator must maintain accurate City information on social media sites by frequently reviewing and updating it as necessary and appropriate. F. A link to the City's website must be included on all social media sites, directing users back to the City of Edmonds website for in-depth information on the posted content unless a waiver is provided by the PIO. 5.5 Open Public Meetings Act Considerations A. Councilmembers, Commissioners and other officials and appointed volunteers (e.g., members of the Lodging Tax Advisory Committee, Tree Board and ad hoc appointed public advisory committees) should not comment or otherwise communicate on the City's social media sites since participating in online discussions may constitute a meeting under the State Open Public Meetings Act. 5.6 Content Posted by the Public A. For all City social media sites that allow the public to post content, those sites shall be deemed limited public forums, moderated by the PIO to ensure content posted by outsides users is appropriate. B. Posted content (including comments, photos and links) must be related to the topic(s) posted by the City to be considered appropriate. C. Inappropriate and prohibited content subject to immediate removal from the site, includes content that: 1. Is not topically related to the particular City -posted content. 2. Promotes or advertises commercial services, entities or products. 3. Supports or opposes political candidates or ballot propositions. 4. Is obscene. 5. Discusses or encourages illegal activity. City of Edmonds Social Media Usage Policy Page Page 5 of 5 6. Promotes, fosters or perpetuates discrimination on the basis of creed, color, age, reli- gion, gender, marital status, status with regard to public assistance, national origin, physical or mental disability or sexual orientation. 7. Provides information that may tend to compromise the safety or security of the public or public systems. 8. Violates legal ownership rights or copyrights. 9. Is libelous or slanderous. 10. Violates an individual's right to privacy. 11. Includes close-up or portrait photographs or videos of individuals taken without their permission. (Crowd photographs or videos do not require individuals' permission.) D. Inappropriate content may be removed immediately by the PIO, in consultation with the City Attorney, and retained as required under the Public Records Act. 5.7 Records Retention and Disclosure A. Information posted on the City's social media sites is subject to the Public Records Act and as- sociated retention schedule. In order to ensure appropriate retention of public records, in general content posted by the Social Media Content Coordinator on City social media sites should not be original source con- tent (content that has not been created anywhere else; i.e., only exists on the social media site), but rather a secondary copy of information that has been posted either on the City web - site or is contained in an electronic record or a hard copy. As an exception, however, the So- cial Media Content Coordinator may post original source content when necessary to provide information, a comment or blog on social media in compliance with the Social Media Usage Policy. B. Original source content posted on social media sites must be retained pursuant to State reten- tion requirements. C. Comments Posted by Outside Users: All comments posted by outside users on City social me- dia sites, including those that are inappropriate and removed by the PIO, must be retained. D. In addition, when the Social Media Content Coordinator removes inappropriate content, he/she must include his/her name and the date and time the content was removed and re- tained a record of such removal. E. City staff may retain content, comments and/or removal of content either via hard copy and/or electronic copy or the City may contract with social media archiving services to comply with these retention requirements. 5.8 Monitoring A. Social Media Content Coordinators will monitor City authorized social media sites that allows public interaction to facilitate accurate information on behalf of the City. Monitoring respon- sibilities are defined in the City of Edmonds Social Media Style Guide. CITY OF EDMONDS SOCIAL MEDIA USE GUIDELINES The following constitute the guidelines regarding the use of City of Edmonds social media tools and posting of comments. A. Privacy Policy and Disclaimer Any individual accessing, browsing and using a City of Edmonds social media site accepts without limitation or qualification these Social Media Use Guidelines (hereafter "Guidelines"). These terms and conditions apply only to the social media sites that are managed by the City of Edmonds. The City of Edmonds maintains the right to modify these Guidelines without notice. Any modification is effective immediately upon posting the modification on the Social Media Policy page, unless otherwise stated. Continued use of a City of Edmonds social media site following the posting of any modification signifies acceptance of such modification. All users of a City of Edmonds social media site are also subject to the site's own Privacy Policy. The City of Edmonds has no control over a site's privacy policy or their modifications to it. The City of Edmonds likewise has no control over content, commercial advertisements, or other postings produced by the social media site that appear on the City of Edmonds social media site as part of the site's environment. The City of Edmonds operates and maintains its social media sites as a public service to provide information about City programs, services, projects, issues, events and activities. The City of Edmonds assumes no liability for any inaccuracies these social media sites may contain and does not guarantee that the social media sites will be uninterrupted or error -free. B. Comments Policy Although we encourage posts and comments on social media sites managed by the City of Edmonds, the City's social media sites and other sites are limited public forums and are moderated by City staff. All posted content (comments, photos, links, etc.) must be related to the topic at hand. The following types of posts and comments are prohibited: • Not topically related to the particular article being commented upon; • Promoting or advertising commercial services, entities or products; • Supporting or opposing political candidates or ballot propositions; • Obscene content; • Related to illegal activity or encouraging or discussing illegal activity; City of Edmonds Social Media Use Guidelines Page 2 of 3 • Promoting, fostering or perpetuating discrimination on the basis of creed, color, age, religion, gender, marital status, status with regard to public assistance, national origin, physical or mental disability, or sexual orientation; • Information that may tend to compromise the safety or security of the public or public systems; • Content that violates legal ownership rights or copyrights; • Content that violates an individual's right to privacy. The City of Edmonds reserves the right to remove posted content that does not comply with these Guidelines. All posts and comments downloaded to the City of Edmonds social media sites will be periodically reviewed. All posts and comments are public records subject to public disclosure under the Washington State Public Records Act. C. Links Policy A. Links to other social media sites and external websites provided on Citv of Edmonds social media sites. The City of Edmonds may select links to other social media sites and outside websites that offer helpful resources for users. Once an individual links to another page or site, the City's Guidelines no longer apply and one becomes subject to the policies of that page or site. The City of Edmonds' social media sites are intended specifically to share information about City programs, events and services. The City of Edmonds is not responsible for the content that appears on these outside links and provides these links as a convenience only. Users should be aware that these external pages and sites and the information found on those pages and sites are not controlled by, provided by or endorsed by the City of Edmonds. The City reserves the right to delete at any time without notice links posted by outside individuals that violate the City's Links Policy. B. Links by other entities to City of Edmonds social media sites. It is not necessary to get advance permission to link to City of Edmonds social media sites; however, entities and individuals linking to City of Edmonds social media sites may not capture any of the City's social media sites within frames, present City of Edmonds content as their own or otherwise misrepresent any of the City's social media site content. Furthermore, they shall not misinform third parties about the origin or ownership of City of Edmonds social media site content. Links to City of Edmonds social media sites should not in any way suggest that the City has any relationship or affiliation with an organization or that the City endorses, sponsors or recommends the information, products or services of another site. D. Copyright Policy All information and materials generated by the City of Edmonds and provided on City of Edmonds social media sites are the property of the City of Edmonds. The City retains copyright on all text, graphic images and other content that was produced by the City of Edmonds and found on the page. Users may print copies of information and material for your own noncommercial use, provided that they retain the City of Edmonds Social Media Use Guidelines Page 3 of 3 copyright symbol or other such proprietary notice intact on any copyrighted materials you copy. Users must include a credit line reading: "Credit: City of Edmonds Facebook (or Twitter) page" or "Courtesy of the City of Edmonds." Commercial use of text, City logos, photos and other graphics is prohibited without the express written permission of the City of Edmonds. Use of the City logo is prohibited for any nongovernmental purposes. Any person reproducing or redistributing a third -party copyright must adhere to the terms and conditions of the third -party copyright holder. A copyright holder who believes that the City of Edmonds has not used an appropriate credit line, he/she may notify the City Public Information Officer with detailed information about the circumstances so that the copyright information may be added or the material in question may be removed. E. Contact If a user has any questions or concerns about the City of Edmonds Social Media Policy or its implementation, or finds incorrect information or is interested in seeking permissions that fall outside the Guidelines above, he/she contact the City's Public Information Officer. AI-7407 Planning Board Agenda Meeting Date: 01/14/2015 7. a. Discussion/Recommendation for General and Land Use Elements of 2015 Comprehensive Plan update. Staff Lead/Author: Rob Chave, Planning Manager Department: Planning Initiated By: City Staff Other Information Subject/Purpose Discussion/Recommendation for General and Land Use Elements of 2015 Comprehensive Plan update. Staff Recommendation Review and forward the draft to the City Council for review. The Board will hold a public hearing in the future. Previous Board Action See attached minutes. Narrative The most recent edits to the General and Land Use sections of the comprehensive plan are attached. Attachment 1: Clean version of the General section (incorporating proposed changes). Attachment 2: General section showing edits from the existing adopted plan. Attachment 3: Clean version of the Land Use section (incorporating proposed changes). Attachment 4: Land Use section showing edits from the existing adopted plan. As before, we are generally trying to retain current policy direction and edit or remove out-of-date language. For example, in the Land Use element, you will see the entire "Water Resources and Drainage Management" section removed; this has been superseded by the city's adopted Storm and Surface Water Comprehensive Management Plan which is referenced in the Utilities Element. For ease of being able to follow any comments/questions, we suggest Board members work off the "Clean" versions contained in Attachments 1 and 3. Attachments Attachment 1: General section, clean version Attachment 2: General section, showing edits Attachment 3: Land Use, clean version Attachment 4: Land Use, showing edits General Background Planning Area The City of Edmonds is located in south Snohomish County on the western shores of Puget Sound approximately 14 miles north of Seattle. Situated within the urbanized Puget Sound region, the city encompasses approximately 8.9 square miles (5,700 acres) in area, including 5 linear miles (26,240 feet) of marine shoreline. Roughly triangular in shape, the city is bounded by Puget Sound on the west; Lynnwood and Mountlake Terrace on the east; unincorporated Snohomish County on the north; and the town of Woodway and the City of Shoreline on the south. Land Use Pattern Single-family residential uses are relatively evenly dispersed throughout the city and occupy the majority of the city's land use base. Approximately 3,272 acres, or 56.3 percent of the city's area is developed for single-family residential uses. Higher density residential development (including apartments and condominiums) is primarily located south and north of the downtown; in the vicinity of the Edmonds-Woodway High School site and Swedish Hospital; and adjacent to 196th Street, 76th Avenue and Highway 99. Together, single-family and multi -family residential units comprise approximately 3,453 acres (nearly 59.4 percent of the total land in the city). Commercial activity is concentrated in two principal areas -- the Downtown/Waterfront and the Highway 99 corridor (which includes the retail and medical development in the vicinity of Swedish Hospital). There are several smaller commercial nodes of varying sizes that help to serve adjacent neighborhoods, such as Westgate, Five Corners, Firdale, Perrinville, and Puget Drive. The Port of Edmonds is located in the southern portion of the city's waterfront. The Port owns and manages 33 upland acres as well as a small boat harbor and marina, with space for 1,000 boats (approximately 11 acres). A variety of services and marine -related businesses are located on the Port's properties. Regional parks and beaches figure prominently in the city, including Brackett's Landing North and South, the Edmonds Fishing Pier, Edmonds Memorial Cemetery, Edmonds Underwater Park, Marina Beach Park, Olympic Beach Park, local tidelands, and the South County Senior Center. The Edmonds Marsh is a significant City -owned open space (23 acres), while Yost Memorial Park is the largest community park owned by the City (48 acres). The largest County resources are Southwest County Park (120 acres) and Meadowdale Beach County Park (95 acres). All together, parks, recreation, and open space lands account for 6.5 percent of City land. Overall, approximately 96 percent of the city is developed. Figure 1 and the accompanying Table 1 summarize existing land uses in the city. 8 General Background Figure 1: Existing Land Use Nrks+Recre4;i&wJ vamnl corArnmial Multi.�:amlly schools Open Spat& 4.0% &6% 3.1% 3.06 1`rd9land+ dySfLd$C4�s 9.5% Water Re wrdion R0�7-9�6% Streelslpsrkingf Driveways 18 9% Sing:e-Fa•rA%- Ni 'i b .Snarce: City of fdmonds GfS, Naw. 2014 Medical 0.7% Mixed Use 017% -Other 2.7% 1 ndustrial 0.0% Ret rementespecial Beds 0 3% Urmernrrxad U 296 k 4J1,1,1 e5 0 2% Table 1: Existina Land Use Total Acres by Use % of Total Acres Single -Family 56.3% 3272.3 Streets/Parking/Driveways 18.8% 1093.9 Parks/Recreation/Open Space 6.5% 375.4 Vacant 4.0% 230.3 Commercial 3.6% 209.7 Multi -Family 3.1 % 181.0 Schools 3.0% 171.5 Tidelands/Bays/Lagoons/Water Retention 1.4% 80.1 Religious 0.7% 41.6 Medical 0.7% 40.8 Mixed Use 0.7% 39.3 Industrial 0.6% 32.2 Retirement/Special Needs 0.3% 16.9 Government 0.2% 14.0 Utilities 0.2% 13.8 Total Source: City of Edmonds GIS, Nov-2014 100.0% 5812.8 General Background 9 Historical Development The earliest documented inhabitants of the area were Native American tribes. As European exploration and settlement in the Pacific Northwest increased, settlers began homesteading and logging activities in the general area of the present-day city. The community that became the City of Edmonds grew out of a homestead and logging operation started by George Brackett in 1876. Logging and shingle -splitting were the dominant economic activities in the community during the 1880's and 1890's. The town continued to grow as other industries including box making, pulp mill, a cigar factory, and increased waterfront activities developed. The Great North Railroad reached the town in 1891 and for many years provided access for goods and passenger travel to Everett and Seattle as well as to the eastern part of the state. Although fires destroyed many of the waterfront mills, shingle production continued to be the primary industry in the city into the 1940s. Ferry service to Kingston began in 1923 when a ferry terminal was built near the location of the existing ferry dock The present ferry terminal was built in the early 1950's after acquisition of the ferry system by the State of Washington. The city continued to grow during the 1940's and 50's, resulting in a more active role of the municipality in providing water, sewer and streets for the residential and commercial expansion. The Port District was formed in 1948 and began waterfront improvements. Commercial and retail businesses within the downtown provided a wide range of services to the community. Completion of Interstate 5 and increased growth in the Puget Sound region led to a gradual change in the character of city with more emphasis on residential development and a decline in the retail importance of the downtown. Although the city is now primarily a residential community, it also provides many amenities for residents and visitors, including restaurants and specialized shopping as well as a long list of festivals and cultural events. The City of Edmonds was incorporated in 1890 with the original town site encompassing approximately 550 acres. The original town site is now occupied primarily by the downtown and adjacent residential areas. The city has expanded in area through annexations to approximately 9.1 square miles. Population The rate of population growth has been relatively stable over the years with major increases occurring primarily as a result of annexations during the 1950s, 1960s, and 1990s. The population growth during these decades was 289.7%, 195.5%, and 28.5% respectively. Maps detailing the annexation timeline for Edmonds are shown below. The growth rate was marginal between 2000-2010 at 0.5%. 2949 1959 2.96 1979 1989 199 9 10 General Background Table 2: City of Edmonds Historical and Projected Growth, 1940 to 2035 Edmonds Percent Avg. Annual Snohomish Percent Avg. Annual Year Population Increase Increase County Increase Increase 1940 1,288 88,754 1950 2,057 59.7% 4.8% 111,580 25.7% 2.3% 1960 8,016 289.7% 14.6% 172,199 54.3% 4.4% 1970 23,684 195.5% 11.4% 265,236 54.0% 4.4% 1980 27,679 16.9% 1.6% 337,720 27.3% 2.4% 1990 30,744 11.1 % 1.1 % 465,642 37.9% 3.3% 2000 39,515 28.5% 2.5% 606,024 30.1 % 2.7% 2010 39,709 0.5% 0.05% 713,335 17.7% 1.6% 2035 (proj.) 45,550 14.7% 0.6% 955,280 33.9% 3.0% Souce: US Census 16% 14% 4% 2% 1040 Source: US Census Figure 2: Edmonds Population 1964 1"D 070 1980 1960 2400 2010 ■ Edmonds Populalion •Avg. Annual ftreaSe 35 30 25 20 15 iQ 5 The population trends in Edmonds are summarized in Table 2 and Figure 2 above. As of 2014, Edmonds is the 3rd most populous city in Snohomish County, and the 27th most populous city in the state. The city ranks 7th in overall population density state-wide, with a 2014 estimated population density of 4,418 people per square mile (Office of Financial Management, 2014). The city has a higher percentage of retired persons and senior citizens than its neighboring cities and Snohomish County as a whole (see Figure 3 on next page). The median age of the population in 2010 was 46.3 years, up from 42.0 years in 2000 and 38.3 years in 1990. In the 2010 Census, the population was 83.4% Caucasian, approximately 7.4% Asian/Pacific Islander, 2.6% African American, 0.7% Native American/Alaskan Native, and 4.1 % mixed race. General Background 11 Figure 3: Age Distribution of Edmonds Residents Under 20 Vears ., 20to44 Years 45to 54 Years .155 to 84 Years 85yea rsand over 2010 21% Z7%, 3390 16% 3% LA C O E �+ 2000 23S'o 3256 Z8°:o k590 2 L 2010 27% 35% 28VO 9`l0 19 E a L c 2000 30R 39 22% a% 1° Ln 0 2010 11% 2� C_ k§M& N L w 2000 390 10°% 19 Source: US Census,2010 Economic Factors During the first decade of the 21 st century, covered employment in Edmonds grew at a modest average annual growth rate (AGR) of 0.56% (compared to Snohomish County at 1.53% AGR and King County -0.32% AGR). These figures are based on the Puget Sound Regional Council's Covered Employment estimates and consist of all employment covered by the Washington Unemployment Insurance Act except jobs in the resource, mining, and construction fields which were excluded to remain consistent with Snohomish County Tomorrow's (SCT) long-term employment targets that do not consider resource, mining, and construction fields into their projections. From 2010 to 2013, Edmonds experienced significant growth in employment as the economy recovered from the recession. During this period, overall employment grew at 2.46% AGR with the most notable rise in service fields (professional services, waste management, private sector educational services, healthcare and social services, arts and entertainment, accommodation and food services) at 18.5% AGR. Figure 4 shows how the employment mix in Edmonds changed over time. Figure 5 shows the percent change of specific industries from 2010 to 2013. In 2013, the Edmonds' total Covered Employment was 12,638. The SCT's 2035 employment projection for Edmonds is 13,948, representing an AGR of 0.47%. 12 General Background Figure 4: Covered Employment Estimate for Edmonds 2000, 2006, and 2013 2000 2006 L Source: Puget Sound Regional Council. 2013 ■ ConsQRes ■ FIRE ■ Manufacturing ■ Rekail ■ 4VTU ■ Govemment ■ Education Figure 5: Percent Change in Covered Employment Estimates, Post -Recession 2010 to 2013 B 7cfx CM - . -ter, kr a i+ MU10" Room "s WTU GOV&T~ wo*i*n T" .iFCha�ye: 02M •W W% 1426% 7410% •14 M. .79.50% 1 _•2EAb i L ZK164 Source: Puget Sound Regional Council. Note: WTU refers to Wholesale Trade, Transportation, and Utilities. FIRE refers to Finance, Insurance, and Real Estate. According to the 2000 Census, the median household income in Edmonds in 1999 was $53,522, which is equivalent to the median income for King and Snohomish Counties ($53,157 and $53,060, respectively). Median income in 1990 was $40,515. General Background 13 Retail trade is a significant employer in the city. However, on a per capita basis, taxable retail sales in the City of Edmonds are relatively lower than Edmonds' neighbors and other cities of similar size, as shown in Figure 6, and roughly the same as Snohomish County as a whole. The City's location amidst densely populated areas suggests that Edmonds has the potential to attract higher retail sales comparable to other cities its size. Figure 6: Taxable Retail Sales per Capita (all NAICS) in 2010 6 c $74 U06 $1fJ.Og4 Edmoni% MounPe.e Sh"ce Lynn*Dw P&Meo MPI Crook BoMell IUNenn Bu-qeR seame Redmmme SnaomO IGy Ta Mx pmR'Y Source: Department of Revenue Housing The city is primarily residential with single-family residences as the predominant land use. Of the 18,378 dwelling units in 2010, 11,685 were single-family (63.6% of the total) and 6,664 were multi- family (36.3% of the total). As shown in Table 3, multi family is continuing to increase its share of total housing stock. In 2000, 68% of all housing units were owner -occupied; this increased to just over 69% by 2010. Average household size continues to decrease over time, from 2.59 persons per household in 1980 to 2.26 persons in 2010. 14 General Background Table 3: Selected Housing Statistics Selected Housing Statistics 1980 1990 2000 2010 SF Housing Units 7,529 8,550 11,391 11,685 MF Housing Units 3,072 4,165 6,038 6,664 Mobile Homes 101 230 90 29 Total Housing Units 10,702 12,945 17,519 18,378 % Single Family 71.3% 67.8% 65.5% 63.6% % Multi Family 28.7% 32.2% 34.5% 36.3% Avg Household Size 2.59 2.41 2.32 2.26 Avg Persons/Unit 2.59 2.37 2.26 2.16 Source: U.S. Census Transportation The existing transportation system consists of a network of principal arterials, minor arterials, collectors and local streets. Three major arterials link together state routes or connect the state route system to major centers and to the ferry system; - SR-104, SR-524/196th Street SW and SR-99. SR- 104 serves east -west travel on the south end of the city and provides access to the Edmonds -Kingston ferry and Interstate 5; SR-524/196th Street SW extends bordering through the east side of the city. SR-99 carries the highest volume of traffic in Edmonds. The Burlington Northern Railroad runs adjacent to the city's shoreline and links Edmonds with Everett to the north and Seattle to the south. The rail line is currently used for freight and AMTRAK and Sound Transit commuter rail passenger rail service; approximately 37 trains a day pass through the city. Bus service is provided by Community Transit with 3 regular bus routes (with service to Mill Creek, Lynnwood, and Alderwood) and 4 peak period only commute bus routes (with service to the University of Washington and downtown Seattle). In 2009, the Swift bus rapid transit was launched, servicing a 17-mile stretch from Shoreline to Everett. The Edmonds -Kingston Ferry connects south Snohomish County and north King County with the northern Kitsap Peninsula and points west on the Olympic Peninsula via the Hood Canal Bridge. The Edmonds -Kingston ferry route remains on of the busiest routes in the state's ferry system. Figure 7 shows historical growth in passenger and vehicle demand from 1980 to 2000. Ridership more than doubled during the 1980s, increasing from nearly 1,950 vehicles and more than 4,250 persons daily in 1980 to over 4,500 vehicles and 9,200 persons daily in 1990. Ridership also increased appreciably in the 1990s, growing by more than 40% to over 6,750 vehicles and 13,000 persons daily during 2000. The 1992 Cross Sound Transportation Study (Booz-Allen and Hamilton Study Team, 1992) concluded that there was no reasonable alternative to the ferry service to meet the projected increases in travel demand. The PSRC based its Transportation Element of Vision 2020 on the Edmonds - Kingston ferry service growing to support the allocation of population within the region. PSRC Destination 2030 identifies the Edmonds Crossing project as a ferry project on the Metropolitan Transportation System and thus a crucial element to the mobility needs and economic vitality of the region. General Background 15 Figure 7: Historical Edmonds Daily Ferry Ridership 201J 5.9w 3.7�J3 3 ■Vehit3as and Driver MVehitle Passengers t99� 1 tv ! u Foot Pa mmgars J_. 2,ow 4,000 0,000 SAM 10000 1 ,000 0 of Passengers Source: Washington State Ferries, Ferry Traffic Statistics Rider Segment Report In response to this need, the Edmonds Crossing project has been proposed to provide a long-term solution to current operations and safety conflicts between ferry, rail, automobile, bus, and pedestrian traffic in downtown Edmonds. The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), the Federal Transit Administration [FTA]), the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) (including Washington State Ferries [WSF]), and the City of Edmonds, in cooperation with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers [Corps], the U.S. Coast Guard, the Suquamish Tribe, the Tulalip Tribe, the Lummi Nation, the Swinomish Tribe, and the Port Gamble S'Klallam Tribe propose to relocate the existing state ferry terminal from Main Street in downtown Edmonds to another site farther from the downtown core at Point Edwards. In the process, a multimodal center would be established that would integrate the ferry, rail, and transit services into a single complex. Access would be provided by a realigned State Route (SR) 104 from its current intersection with Pine Street. The new complex would provide an upgraded ferry terminal designed to meet the operational requirements for accommodating forecast ferry ridership demand; a new rail station designed to meet intercity (Amtrak) passenger service and commuter rail loading requirements; a transit center that would meet local bus system and regional transit system loading requirements; facilities for accommodating both vehicular commuters and walk-on passengers of the available transportation modes (parking, drop-off areas, retail and concessionaire space, and waiting areas); and a system linking these facilities to allow for the safe movement of users Neighborhoods Edmonds has a variety of neighborhoods, big and small, named and unnamed. Some neighborhoods, such as in the Highway 99 area, in the "Bowl," Firdale, and Perrinville, include commercial activities. (Note: The Bowl refers to the downtown area and vicinity; it comprises about 17% of the City's 16 General Background population.) Many neighborhood areas include parks, trails, and other amenities that help identify them or add to their unique character. Each neighborhood is valuable and contributes to the community as a whole. Recognizing this character and value, while still allowing for positive changes in neighborhoods over time, is an important concept. Public Process Public Participation Goal A. It is the goal of the City of Edmonds to provide early and continuous public notice for the proposed comprehensive plan amendments in advance of all opportunities to comment on the proposals, and to allow those who express an interest in any of the amendments to be able to track their progress through the legislative decision process. A.1. Use a variety of methods to provide early and ongoing public notice of the proposed amendments, including such things as publication in news outlets, advertising on local public access television, placing notices in a City newsletter, compiling a list of interested parties, and/or providing information on the City's website. A.2. Information provided by the City of Edmonds as part of this public participation process will be designed to: A.1.a. Use plain understandable language. A. Lb. Provide broad dissemination of information regarding the proposals. A.1.c. Provide early and continuous notification. A. IA Provide opportunities for commenting in a variety of ways — verbally, in writing, and via email. A.3. In addition to providing early and continuous information on the plan amendment proposals, the City of Edmonds will provide a formal adoption process with public hearing(s) and opportunities for public comment and input. General Background 17 General Background Planning Area The City of Edmonds is located in south Snohomish County on the western shores of Puget Sound approximately 14 miles north of Seattle (Fig . Situated within the urbanized Puget Sound region, the city encompasses approximately 8.9 square miles (5,700 acres) in area, including 5 lixea4linear miles (26,240 feet) of marine shoreline. Roughly triangular in shape, the city is bounded by Puget Sound on the west; Lynnwood and Mountlake Terrace on the east; unincorporated Snohomish County on the north; and the town of Woodway, pera4e Snohomish Genf y (the �� or�„�� � ��', and King Cetht" en the the City of Shoreline on the south. Land Use Pattern Single-family residential uses are relatively evenly dispersed throughout the city and occupy the majority of the city's land use base. Approximately 34,-003,272 acres, or 55-56.3 percent of the Qtyls ci 's area is developed for single-family residential uses. Higher density residential development (including apartments and condominiums) is primarily located south and north of the downtown; in the vicinity of the Edmonds-Woodway High School site and Stevens Swedish Hospital; and adjacent to 196th Street, 76th Avenue and Highway 99. Together, single-family and multi -family residential units comprise approximately 3,400 453 acres (nearly 64-59.4 percent of the total land in the city). Commercial activity is concentrated in two principal areas -- the Downtown/Waterfront and the Highway 99 corridor (which includes the retail and medical development in the vicinity of Stevens Swedish Hospital). There are severalSmaller- smaller commercial nodes of varyin sizes help to .serve adjacent neighborhoods, such as -afe�Aereatedd M the inlefseetion of Edmonds Way Comer-OWestgate, Five Corners, Firdale, Perrinville, and Puget Drive. The Port of Edmonds is located in the southern portion of the city's waterfront. The Port owns and manages 33 upland acres as well as a small boat harbor and marina, with space for 1,000 boats (approximately 11 acres). A variety of services and marine -related businesses are located on Tow -the Port's properties fie. there are another- 229 aefes of County eNN%ed par4s and epefl spaee land in the Edmonds area. Regional parks and beaches figure prominently in the Qtyd1y, including Brackett's Landing North and South, the Edmonds Fishing Pier, Edmonds Memorial Cemetery, Edmonds Underwater Park, Marina Beach Park, Olympic Beach Park, local tidelands, and the South County Senior Center. The Edmonds Marsh is a significant City -owned open space (23 acres), while Yost Memorial Park is the largest community park owned by the City (48 acres). The largest County resources are Southwest County Park (120 acres) and Meadowdale Beach County Park (95 acres). All together, parks, recreation, and open space lands account for 6.5 percent of City land. 8 General Background Overall, approximately 96 percent of the city is developed. T-abk-Figure 1 and the accompanying Figure fable 1 summarize existing land uses in the city. General Background Figure 1: Existing Land Use NrksJRecre4;i&wJ Vamnl COmrnmial MtiII&Family Sclwks Open Spat& 4.0% &6% 3.1% 3.06 1`rd9land+ dySfLd$C4�s 9.5% Water Re wrdion R0�7-9�6% StreelsjParkingf Driveways 18 9% —Other 2.7% Medical 0.7% Mixed Use 017% Industrial 0.0% Si-kg:e-Fa-r:Iy Retiremente pecial ht� 3°b �ecLS 0 3"6 � U�mernnwyd U 296 k 411,10es 0 2% Source: City of Fdmonds (US, Nov. 70�4 Figure 1: Existing Land Use Vacant, Unclassified, 6.6% ROW, 19.2% Public, Utility, 0.6% ' Open Space, Recreation.4.4% Community Facilitie 5.0% Commerc Multi Family, 4.8% Single Family, 54.8% 10 General Background Table 1: Existing Land Use Total Acres by Use % of Total Acres Single -Family 56.3% 3272.3 Streets/Parking/Driveways 18.8% 1093.9 Parks/Recreation/Open Space 6.5% 375.4 Vacant 4.0% 230.3 Commercial 3.6% 209.7 Multi -Family 3.1 % 181.0 Schools 3.0% 171.5 Tidelands/Bays/Lagoons/Water Retention 1.4% 80.1 Religious 0.7% 41.6 Medical 0.7% 40.8 Mixed Use 0.7% 39.3 Industrial 0.6% 32.2 Retirement/Special Needs 0.3% 16.9 Government 0.2% 14.0 Utilities 0.2% 13.8 Total 100.0% 5812.8 Source: City of Edmonds GIS, Nov-2014 T Existing Land Use - Land Use Type Acres %-Gt`i Single Family �2 .9 Community Cnnilitioc 286 5.0`@ c neR SpaGe, ReEweatien 50 .p � 44% Di ihl�U tniity -36 tl 6% ROW 4-,� 19.20% -c�carn �-vrrcra� nTca VaGan4 I InGlassofied 379 �@ General Background 11 Historical Development The earliest documented inhabitants of the area were semi sede tq! , likely ,.,,m. die bands ative American tribess. As European exploration and settlement in the Pacific Northwest increased, settlers began homesteading and logging activities in the general area of the present-day city. The community that became the City of Edmonds grew out of a homestead and logging operation started by George Brackett in 1876. Logging and shingle -splitting were the dominant economic activities in the community during the 1880's and 1890's. The town continued to grow as other industries including box making, pulp mill, a cigar factory, and increased waterfront activities developed. The Great North Railroad reached the town in 1891 and for many years provided access for goods and passenger travel to Everett and Seattle as well as to the eastern part of the state. Although fires destroyed many of the waterfront mills, shingle production continued to be the primary industry in the city into the 1940s. Ferry service to Kingston began in 1923 when a ferry terminal was built near the location of the existing ferry dock. The present ferry terminal was built in the early 1950's after acquisition of the ferry system by the State of Washington. The city continued to grow during the 1940's and 50's, resulting in a more active role of the municipality in providing water, sewer and streets for the residential and commercial expansion. The Port District was formed in 1948 and began waterfront improvements. Commercial and retail businesses within the downtown provided a wide range of services to the community. Completion of Interstate 5 and increased growth in the Puget Sound region led to a gradual change in the character of city with more emphasis on residential development and a decline in the retail importance of the downtown. TtrAlthou hg the city is now primarily a residential community;—Jt also provides many amenities for residents and visitors, including restaurants; and specialized shopping as well as a long list of festivals and cultural events such the annual aft f sti' The City of Edmonds was incorporated in 1890 with the original town site encompassing approximately 550 acres. The original town site is now occupied primarily by the downtown and adjacent residential areas. The city has expanded in area through annexations to approximately 8s12.-1 square miles. Population The rate of population growth has been relatively stable over the years with major increases occurring primarily as a result of annexations in —during the 1950s,—a-a&1960s, and 1990s. The population growth during these decades was 289.7%, 195.5%, and 28.5% respectively. Maps detailing annexation timeline for Edmonds are shown below. The growth rate was marginal between 2000-2010 at 0.5%.. Table 2: City of Edmonds Historical and Projected Growth 1940 to 2025 Edmonds Percent Avg Annual Snohomish Percent Avg Annual Year Population Increase Increase County Increase Increase 1940 1,288 11 % 88,754 1950 2,057 60% 4.8% 111,580 26% 2.3% 1960 8,016 290% 14.6% 172,199 54% 4.4% 1970 23,684 195% 11.4% 265,236 54% 4.4% 1980 27,679 17% 1.6% 337,720 27% 2.4% 1990 30,744 11 % 1.1 % 465,642 38% 3.3% 2000 39,515 29% 2.5% 606,024 30% 2.7% 2025 44,880 14% 0.5% 12 General Background MOVIMMMKO IN • ..A It I� A 2949 2959 1969 1979 Y� 1989 1999 ' f Table 2: City of Edmonds Historical and Projected Growth, 1940 to 2035 Edmonds Percent Avg. Annual Snohomish Percent Avg. Annual Year Population Increase Increase County Increase Increase 1940 1,288 88,754 1950 2,057 59.7% 4.8% 111,580 25.7% 2.3% 1960 8,016 289.7% 14.6% 172,199 54.3% 4.4% 1970 23,684 195.5% 11.4% 265,236 54.0% 4.4% 1980 27,679 16.9% 1.6% 337,720 27.3% 2.4% 1990 30,744 11.1 % 1.1 % 465,642 37.9% 3.3% 2000 39,515 28.5% 2.5% 606,024 30.1 % 2.7% 2010 39,709 0.5% 0.05% 713,335 17.7% 1.6% 2035 (proj.) 45,550 14.7% 0.6% 955,280 33.9% 3.0% Sauce: US Census IV% - 14% 2% 09a � 794U Figure 2: Edmonds Population I ri 954 =1ihG :974 ■ Edmonds Npulalion 1980 199U 2MO zolu •Avg. Annual Increase 15 10 5 0 C O i+ 7 CL O 1L 5 O I - General Background 13 Source: UScensufigure 2: Edmonds Population 45,000 40,000 35,000 O E 30,000 Q 25,000 d 20,000 15,000 O 10,000 5,000 0 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 Period Ending... ■ City Population 16.0% 14.0% O N 12.0% L 10.0% 8.0% 6.0% Q 4.0% 2.0% Q 0.0% 2000 ■Avg Annual Increase Figure 3: Edmonds: City vs. Area Growth 50,000 45,000 40,000 35,000 C O 30,000 25,000 Q 0 20,000 0. 15,000 10,000 5,000 0 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 Period Ending... ■ Edmonds Area ■ City Population 14 General Background Figs eS 2 a -Rd 3 OR the Pe .e *The population trends in Edmonds and the suffeunding are summarized in Table 2 and Figure 2 above. annexations, pepuWien gfowth i the ever -all Edmonds area has ro ea at a low le ,4. As of 24042014, Edmonds is the 2rd-3rd largest most populous city in Snohomish County, and the 22ffEI727th largest most populous city in the state. The city ranks 8&7th in overall population density state-wide, with a 20042014 estimated population density of 4-,-IS24,418 people per square mile (Office of Financial Management, 2014). The city has a higher percentage of retired persons and senior citizens than its neighboring cities and Snohomish County as a whole (see Figure 3 on next page). The median age of the population in 2-000 2010 was 42.046.3 years, up from 38.342.0 years in 49W2000 and 33-.538.3 years in 49801990. The In the 2010 Census, the population i -was 83.4% Caucasian, _with -approximately 4 7.41/o pereent-Asian-er/-Pacific Islander, .6% African American, 0.7% Native American, Eskimo, Aleut, and ethef:/Alaskan Native, and 4.1% mixed race. General Background 15 Figure 3: Age Distribution of Edmonds Residents w Under 20 years j 20 to 44 Years 45 to 64 yews rr 65 to 84 Years 85 Years and over 2020 ZIN. Z7%, 33% .16% 31 4A LU 2WO 3Z% 28% L5% 2 L 2010 27% 35/G 29% 9% 1 E a L 2000 30R �9�b 22% 896 1 Ln O 2010 269p MEOW 4% 27% 11% 2 C_ L w 2000 3% 10% 1 Source USCensus,201^Cinv. rgure-t Age Distribution of Edmonds Residents and Nearby Cities 9o-01 Local poprlatien 1 Q94t — 943t - — d4�st r5511 older — �qq;p ■ 19 R under 64evo — 53?b 55'.'0 55¢b 54Wo 54efo 1.�0 524n G1¢o — 4— I44io 20% 10% - 0% Edmonds shareline l}rrmood Mountlake Eeereit Bothell Kirkland King County Snohomish Terrace Cou nti Source: U.S. Census, 2000 16 General Background Economic Factors During the first decade of the 2 1 " century, covered employment in Edmonds grew at a modest average annual growth rate (AGR) of 0.56% (compared to Snohomish County at 1.53% AGR and King City -0.32% AGR). These figures are based on the Puget Sound Regional Council's Covered Employment estimates and consist of all employment covered by the Washin Loon Unemployment Insurance Act except jobs in the resource, mining, and construction fields which were excluded to remain consistent with Snohomish County Tomorrow's (SCT) lon -tg erm employment targets that do not consider resource, mining, and construction fields into their projections. From 2010 to 2013, Edmonds experienced significant growth in employment as the economy recovered from the l-recession. During this period, overall employment grew at 2.46% AGR with the most notable rise in service fields (professional services, waste management, private sector educational services, healthcare and social services, arts and entertainment, accommodation and food services) at 18.5% AGR. Figure 4 shows how the employment mix in Edmonds changed over time. Figure 5 shows the percent change of specific industries from 2010 to 2013. In 2013, the Edmonds' total Covered Employment was 12,638. The SCT's 2035 employmentprojection for Edmonds is 13,948, representing an AGR of 0.47%. Figure 4: Covered Employment Estimate for Edmonds 2000, 2006, and 2013 lip, 0111, Mvp Table Edmonds Employment by Sector - 2000 Gensuc FIRES Mafmfaetufing Retail men mien Tetal 7-74 4,48 4-� ''� 56-1 ' 544 �4 General Background 17 2000 2006 _Source: US-. Census, ", 200npujzet Sound Regional Council. 201 ■ ConsQRes ■ FIRE ■ ManufacluNrng ■ Rekail ■ 4VTU ■ Govemment ■ Education Figure 5: Percent Change in Covered Employment Estimates, Post -Recession 2010 to 2013 S 7 S ., z - . _ WM -70% — -90% FIRE �b+u�c4�_ 1 #FChanpe: OW% _ •8r3 C% _ ■ 0 PI"M SOW"f. WTLP Cwr$�� d d4Cbt T04 .7$.$ 3?.E4'Ib Z3 to% Source: Puget Sound Regional Council. Note: WTU refers to Wholesale Trade, Transportation, and Utilities. FIRE refers to Finance, Insurance, and Real Estate. According to the 2000 Census, the median household income in Edmonds in 1999 was $53,522, which is equivalent to the median income for King and Snohomish Counties ($53,157 and $53,060, respectively). Median income in 1990 was $40,515. Retail trade is a significant employer in the city. However, on a per capita basis, taxable retail sales in the City of Edmonds are relatively lower than Edmonds' neighbors and other cities of similar size, as shown in Figure 6-5, and roughly the same as Snohomish County as a whole. The City's location amidst densely populated areas suggests that Edmonds has the potential to attract higher retail sales comparable to other cities its size. 18 General Background Figure 6: Taxable Retail Sales per Capita (all NAICS) in 2010 R 6 &Vow c $20 om SIO-Mo Edmcni% Mountlexe ShoMme Lxnnwoao LWVA o NII Ut-w bAell Klf Jwm &rnen same Redmonc Sno wwA Ksg Ta zw C+wr4 Gwmy Source: Department ofRevenue Taxable Retail Sales per Capita for the City of Edmonds and Surrounding Areas (:ooa 5} €#GJap6 €3€,Op6 €3D,Op6 €2€)p00 €2D,000 €1€)p00 €10,000 €€)p00 so Mour9lake SndFomish Kiig pdmatids LynmNood Shardine Terrace 0a1he1 Puriei IGrklerj Evtrett CounFf Ccurty 02M2 Tam61e Kehl Sales Per Capita P.269 535.2d3 P.711 $ 913 $1 Q15d $9,9M 5M372 M 29617 $7,221 A9g99 2M2 %p+uhlian 3$5117 M.990 5Z730 2Q470 3Q910 31.1310 45.790 93,1350 CZ7.500 1.779,000 200L2 Tamble Rt"I Sale (milkce) 5297 %1.232 $411 55e 5313 "17 1750 $1.157 A6M 117.245 Source, Washington Star Department cf Revenue, Office f Financial Management Housing The city is primarily residential with single-family residences as the predominant land use. Of the 17,51918,378 dwelling units in 2-OW2010, 44-,-U9-f11,685 were single-family (65�.5pereet63.6% of General Background 19 the total) and E}0356, 664 were multi -family (34.5 per-ee�*36.3% of the total). As shown in Table 34, multi family is continuing to increase its share of total housing stock. In 4902000 65.3 petee�+68% of all housing units were owner -occupied; this increased to just over 699%S pereext by 20092010. Average household size continues to decrease over time, from 2.59 persons per household in 1980 to 2—.3-22.26 persons in 20002010.- Table 3: Selected Housing Statistics Selected Housing Statistics 1980 1990 2000 2010 SF Housing Units 7,529 8,550 11,391 11,685 MF Housing Units 3,072 4,165 6,038 6,664 Mobile Homes 101 230 90 29 Total Housing Units 10,702 12,945 17,519 18,378 • Single Family 71.3% 67.8% 65.5% 63.6% • Multi Family 28.7% 32.2% 34.5% 36.3% A\,g Household Size 2.59 2.41 2.32 2.26 A\g Persons/Unit 2.59 2.37 2.26 2.16 Table 49M 49" 240 SF Housing Units 529 8,550 ,J711 3nT1 0 72 4,165 z 03- �,v�z �ro� �,�✓a Mobile Homes T o o Total Heusing Units , ,519 0% Single F�.�,;h. '71 30% 67 80% tic 5 era era era v:rry Iry Iry Avg Household C;zo 7.� 59 7�T 41 7�Zz7 Avg Per-sons/Uni 2.59 7�T 37 2�7ti Source: U.S. Census, 2000 Transportation The existing transportation system consists of a network of principal arterials, minor arterials, collectors and local streets. Three major arterials link together state routes or connect the state route system to major centers and to the ferry system; - SR-104, SR-524/196th Street SW and SR-99. SR- 104 serves east -west travel on the south end of the city and provides access to the Edmonds -Kingston ferry and Interstate 5�; SR-524/196th Street SW extends bordering through the east side of the city. SR-99 carries the highest volume of traffic in Edmonds. 20 General Background The Burlington Northern Railroad runs adjacent to the city's shoreline and links Edmonds with Everett to the north and Seattle to the south. The rail line is currently used for freight and AMTRAK and Sound Transit commuter rail passenger rail service; ximately; approximately 37 trains a day pass through the city. Bus service is provided by Community Transit with 3 regular bus routes (with service to Mill Creek, Lynnwood, and Alderwood)-and 4 peak period only commute bus routes (with service to the University of Washington and downtown Seattle). In 2009, the Swift bus rapid transit was launched, servicing a 17-mile stretch from Shoreline to Everett. The Edmonds -Kingston Ferry connects south Snohomish County and north King County with the northern Kitsap Peninsula and points west on the Olympic Peninsula via the Hood Canal Bridge. The Edmonds -Kingston ferry route remains on of the busiest routes in the state's ferry system. Figure 76 shows historical growth in passenger and vehicle demand from 1980 to 2000. Ridership more than doubled during the 1980s, increasing from nearly 1,950 vehicles and more than 4,250 persons daily in 1980 to over 4,500 vehicles and 9,200 persons daily in 1990. Ridership also increased appreciably in the 1990s, growing by more than 40-pefeent%o to over 6,750 vehicles and 13,000 persons daily during 2000. The 1992 Cross Sound Transportation Study (Booz-Allen and Hamilton Study Team, 1992) concluded that there was no reasonable alternative to the ferry service to meet the projected increases in travel demand. The PSRC based its Transportation Element of Vision 2020 on the Edmonds- Kingston ferry service growing to support the allocation of population within the region. PSRC Destination 2030 identifies the Edmonds Crossing project as a ferry project on the Metropolitan Transportation System and thus a crucial element to the mobility needs and economic vitality of the region. Figure 7: Historical Edmonds Daily Ferry Ridership 20�Q i.453 7�ifi€1 1_676 . ■Vehic3os and Driver Mvehicle Passengers t990 ►+Foot Passengers 1313�7 2.000 4.0M 6,1000 8.1004 110,004 # of Passengers 12,0m 14,000 General Background 21 2000 Vehide Passe ngers(400) I P$ssemersf1.67E1 16276 Vehitdes& Drivers 11300 Vahrde Passengers (3249) I P. . . i Arty 14.706 VGhides & DriverS 14,509 190 Vehicle& WaIODn Passengers 12,317 1ehiides & Drivers 11.0115 8,755 Seuree.-Source: Washington State Ferries, Ferry Traffic Statistics Rider Segment Roo-R-I ,,ends Gres -sing Final EJ& 2004 In response to this need, the Edmonds Crossing project :s being deve epe has been proposed to provide a long-term solution to current operations and safety conflicts between ferry, rail, automobile, bus, and pedestrian traffic in downtown Edmonds. The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), the Federal Transit Administration [FTA]), the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) (including Washington State Ferries [WSF]), and the City of Edmonds, in cooperation with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers [Corps], the U.S. Coast Guard, the Suquamish Tribe, the Tulalip Tribe, the Lummi Nation, the Swinomish Tribe, and the Port Gamble S'Klallam Tribe propose to relocate the existing state ferry terminal from Main Street in downtown Edmonds to another site farther from the downtown core at Point Edwards. In the process, a multimodal center would be established that would integrate the ferry, rail, and transit services into a single complex. Access would be provided by a realigned State Route (SR) 104 from its current intersection with Pine Street. The new complex would provide an upgraded ferry terminal designed to meet the operational requirements for accommodating forecast ferry ridership demand; a new rail station designed to meet intercity (Amtrak) passenger service and commuter rail loading requirements; a transit center that would meet local bus system and regional transit system loading requirements; facilities for accommodating both vehicular commuters and walk-on passengers of the available transportation modes (parking, drop-off areas, retail and concessionaire space, and waiting areas); and a system linking these facilities to allow for the safe movement of users 22 General Background • pneWITITITIM base,on the west f4eing slopes of Aiget Setmd pfevides many amenities ineittding exteasi-,�e views of the numer-otts well kept residepAial neighbor -hoods, a viable economic and an active, ifwolve Edmonds has a variety of neighborhoods, big and small, named and unnamed. Some neighborhoods, such as in the Highway 99 area, in the "Bowl," Firdale, and Perrinville, include commercial activities. (Note: The Bowl refers to the downtown area and vicinity; it comprises about 17% of the City's population.)Many neighborhood areas include parks, trails, and other amenities that help identify them or add to their unique character. Each neighborhood is valuable and contributes to the community as a whole. Recognizing this character and value, while still allowing for positive changes in neighborhoods over time, is an important concept. Public Process Public Participation Goal A. It is the goal of the City of Edmonds to provide early and continuous public notice for the proposed comprehensive plan amendments in advance of all opportunities to comment on the proposals, and to allow those who express an interest in any of the amendments to be able to track their progress through the legislative decision process. A.1. Use a varietv of methods to provide earlv and oneoine public notice of the proposed amendments, including such things as publication in news outlets, advertising on local public access television, placing notices in a City newsletter, compiline a list of interested parties. and/or providine information on the Citv's website. A.2. Information provided by the City of Edmonds as part of this public participation process will be designed A. La. Use plain understandable language. A.1.b.2-. Provide broad dissemination of information reeardine the proposals. A. 1. c.3-. Provide early and continuous notification. A.1.d.4.Provide opportunities for commenting in a variety of ways — verbally, in writing, and via email. A.3. In addition to providing early and continuous information on the plan amendment proposals, the City of Edmonds will provide a formal adoption process with public hearing(s) and opportunities for public comment and input. General Background 23 1111 M. 0 NO PINION �_W JOIC lim- 24 General Background Land Capacity Background The Growth Mangement Act (GMA) provides the framework for planning at all levels in Washington State. Under the mandate of the GMA (RCW 36.70A.215), local governements are required to evaluate the density and capacity for Urban Growth Areas (UGAs). Edmonds has been allocated population, housing, and employment growth targets through County Planning Policies. Population projections are based on the official 20-year population projections for Snohomish County from the Office of Financial Management and distributed as represented in Puget Sound Regional Council's Vision 2040 Regional Growth Strategy. Edmonds is considered a Larger City for regional growth strategy purposes. The Larger City designation is applied to cities that have a combined population and employment total over 22,500. Currently, eighteen cities are grouped in the Larger City designation. As a group, these cities are expected to accommodate 14% of the region's projected population growth and 12% of the regional projected employment growth. The 2035 population target for Edmonds is 45,550 persons, up 14.4% from the 2011 population estimate of 39,800. To accommodate the targeted growth, Edmonds will require approximately 2,772 new housing units and 2,313 new jobs by 2035. Table 4 summarizes available GIS data on land supply in Edmonds as it existed in 2014. Developed acres include the entire parcel boundaries that contained development, not just the building footprint. The Edmonds Marsh accounted for all vacant acres listed under Parks & Open Space. Table 4 City of Edmonds Land Supply (Gross Acres), 2014 Land Use Total Acres Developed Lands Acres % of Total Acres Vacant Lands Acres % of Total Acres Residential Single -Family 3428.9 3272.3 56.9% 156.6 2.7% Multi -Family 203.9 181.0 3.1% 22.9 0.4% Retirement/Special Needs 16.9 16.9 0.3% Business Commercial 209.7 209.7 3.6% Industrial 32.2 32.2 0.6% Medical 40.8 40.8 0.7% Mixed Use 62.8 39.3 0.7% 23.5 0.4% Public Facilities Government 14.0 14.0 0.2% Schools 171.5 171.5 3.0% Parks & Open Space 416.7 393.3 6.8% 23.4 0.4% Religious 41.6 41.6 0.7% Streets/Parking/Driveways 1093.9 1093.9 19.0% Utilities 13.8 13.8 0.2% Total 1 5746.7 1 5520.3 96.1% 226.4 3.9% Source: City of Edmonds GIS data, Nov-2014 38 Lana Use Overall, nearly 4% of the City's land was vacant in 2014. Approximately 79.3% of the vacant lands (226.4 acres) were designated for residential uses: 69.2% for single-family residences and 10.1% for multi -family residences. Of the remaining vacant lands, 10.4% was designated for mixed use and 10.3% represented the Edmonds Marsh. For a more in-depth study, the 2012 Buildable Lands Report (BLR) developed build -out capacity estimates for vacant and under -developed parcels. Using a process developed by Snohomish County Tomorrow, the BLR was prepared in 2012 and adopted by the Snohomish County Council in June 2013. This report provided the city with the necessary information to complete a development capacity analysis. Table 5: Summary of Buildable Lands Report Additional Additional Housing Unit Additional Housing Unit Additional Population Employment Capacity (before reductions) Capacity (after reductions) Capacity (after reductions) Capacity (after I reductions) SF I MF Sr. Apts Total SF MF Sr. Apts Total SF I MF Sr. Apts Total Buildable Lands Report 561 2,381 482 3,424 444 1,868 334 2,646 1,236 3,437 393 5,065 2,820 Source: Buildable Lands Report, 2012 Given the limited supply of vacant land within the city, capacity estimates were not calculated strictly on the amount of vacant buildable land, but also on increased densities and intensity of redevelopment within various areas of the city. Different methods of development were targeted to provide additional residential capacity. For example, accessory dwelling units (ADUs) were one method of attempting to supplement capacity in single family neighborhoods, while encouraging mixed use development in commercial areas provided for additional capacity in areas already experiencing a higher level of activity. Planned Residential Developments (PRDs) were also targeted as a way of assuring maximum buildout of single -family -zoned areas while maintaining the character of the city. Following adoption of the 1995 comprehensive plan, the city embarked on an implementation program to achieve the goals identified in the plan. Many of these implementation measures are described in the Housing Element under the discussion of "strategies to promote affordable housing." These measures were taken by the city to address issues related to both capacity and affordable housing. A key feature of Edmonds' comprehensive plan is its emphasis on mixed use development, which includes both commercial and residential uses on a single lot or combination of lots. For example, a mixed use development could include a two-story development with residential dwelling units on the second floor and offices, shops or other commercial uses on the ground floor, or it could consist of a mixture of uses arranged in proximity to each other. Mixed use development is allowed in both of the city's Activity Centers and Corridor development areas. In the 1995 comprehensive plan, mixed use development was to be allowed under all the alternatives considered, but would only be encouraged under the adopted "Designed Infill" alternative. The encouragement of mixed use development continues as a basic assumption underlying the current comprehensive plan. This basic approach is embodied in much of the development that has occurred in recent years. The importance of mixed use in the city's land use pattern can be seen in Figure 9. Land Use 39 Figure 9: General Use Categories by % of City Land Area Singli Res 22 Singe Family Urban 19.7496 Source: City of Edmonds GIS, Nov-]4 Population and Employment Capacity Multi Family Mixed use 5.89% Crammer€ial //f O Medical 0.32% Parks 5.27% Open Sl aoe 0.93% J-111#les 0.24 The 2012 Buildable Lands Report (BLR) showed an Edmonds housing capacity of an additional 2,646 units through the year 2035, which would accommodate a total population of 45,550 residents. Since the BLR was finalized in 2012, some of the assumptions regarding buildable lands have changed. During the 2015 Comprehensive Plan update, city staff considered how these changes affected capacity projections. For example, recent plans by the City to encourage mixed -use development in the Neighborhood Business areas of Westgate and Five Corners, plus the removal of restrictions on first and second floor residential development in CG and CG2 zones along the Highway 99 corridor, should provide the city with buildable lands capacity not considered in the 2012 BLR. In total, the City conservatively estimates these actions can increase the buildable lands capacity by approximately 850 net housing units applying the same methodology used in the Buildable Lands Report. With these adjustments, the City estimates a total capacity of 2,810 additional housing units by the year 2035. The projected need to accommodate the targeted population growth was 2,772 housing units as determined by the Countywide Planning Policies. The land capacity analysis, combined with the goals and policies in the comprehensive plan, indicate that the 2035 targets for population and employment can be accommodated by the City. A summary of historical growth and the 2035 population and housing targets is presented in Figure 10 and Table 6. 40 Land Use The adopted 2035 employment target for Edmonds is 14,148, which represents an increase of 2,313 above the 11,835 people employed in the City in 2011. The 2012 Buildable Lands analysis showed a potential increased capacity of 2,820 employees by 2035, which has been increased to 3,522 using the same analysis employed in reviewing the housing and population capacity discussed above. The City should consider using incentives to achieve redevelopment and infill goals and zoning incentives or other measures to ensure that land adjacent to infrastructure facilities is utilized to maximize the economic and environmental benefits of that infrastructure. Given the extent to which future land use policies, regulations, demographics and market forces could affect land capacity estimates, however, it is important that development trends and remaining land supply within the city is regularly monitored in order to ensure the continued supply of adequate urban land throughout the 20-year GMA planning horizon. Implementation strategies should include development of a long-term program to monitor the city's progress towards goals contained in the Comprehensive Plan. As part of the monitoring process, the city should work with the public, environmental and business leaders, interest groups, cities and other agencies to develop detailed monitoring criteria or "benchmarks" that could be used to measure progress and identify the need for corrective action. Specific implementation measures should seek to reduce barriers or impediments to development. For example, measures that reduce the regulatory compliance burden of the private sector, if successful, would reduce the cost imposed by such regulations. Similarly, implementation measures that are designed to encourage flexibility could also help reduce compliance costs — at least on a case - by -case basis. Specific measures could include: provision of flexible development standards; density bonuses for site designs that provide public benefits; and fee waivers or expedited review that lower financial development risks Land Use 41 Figure 10: Edmonds Growth Targets vs. Historical Growth 60 s O F 40 sS s 0 8q a 25 0 a 20 16 M S 1940 1%0 1966 i'ro 1*0 1W 2M 2010 2G2V Ms, 2099' MNPOIetir.- --*--Growth Tnryet ScYfC6. Census. 20fO. BuiidatdeLands Repo f. 20f2 Table 6 City of Edmonds Existing and Projected Growth 2000 2010 2035 (Plan Target) Population 39,515 39,709 45,550 Nominal Change 8,771 194 5,841 % Change 28.50% 0.49% 14.71% Annual % Change 2.50% 0.05% 0.55% Housing Units 17,508 18,378 21,168 Nominal Change 4,563 870 2,790 % Change 35.20% 4.97% 15.18% Avg HH Size 2.32 2.26 2.2 Avg Persons/Unit 2.26 2.16 2.15 Gross Density 1 3.1 3.16 3.64 Source: Census 2010, Buildable Lands Report 2012 1 Gross Density = number of households per gross acre of land, city-wide. Note that this includes non-residential land, so the densityper gross residential acre is significantly higher. 42 Land Use Activity Centers Introduction. The VISION2040 regional plan establishes a growth management, transportation, environmental, and economic strategy for the Puget Sound region of urban growth areas (UGAs) framed by open space and linked by efficient, high capacity transit. The concepts developed in VISION 2040 are supported in the Edmonds Comprehensive Plan. The approach proposed in Edmonds is to strategically plan for future development in two activity centers located within the community. Activity Centers in Edmonds are intended to address the following framework goals: oo Pedestrian -oriented - Provide a pedestrian -oriented streetscape environment for residential and commercial activity. oo Mixed -use - Encourage mixed -use development patterns that provide a variety of commercial and residential opportunities, including both multi -family and small -lot single family development. oo Community character - Build on historical character and natural relationships, such as historic buildings, slopes with views, and the waterfront. oo Multimodal -Encourage transit service and access. oo Balanced (re)development - Strategically plan for development and redevelopment that achieves a balanced and coordinated approach to economic development, housing, and cultural goals. oo Concurrency -Coordinate the plans and actions of both the public and private sectors. oo Urban design - Provide a context for urban design guidelines that maximize predictability while assuring a consistent and coherent character of development. oo Adaptive reuse - Provide incentives to encourage adaptive reuse as an alternative to redevelopment of historic structures in order to preserve these resources. Land Use 43 Downtown/Waterfront Activity Center Plan Context. A number of public plans and projects have been taking shape in recent years, and these will have a profound impact on the future of the city's downtown/waterfront area. Some of these ongoing activities include: oo Increased concern about conflicts and safety issues related to the interaction of rail, ferry, vehicular and pedestrian traffic. oo Transportation planning and the Edmonds Crossing multimodal project which will move the existing ferry terminal at the base of Main Street to a new multimodal transportation center at Pt. Edwards. oo Continued development of the city's waterfront parks and walkways into an interconnected necklace of public spaces. oo The South County Senior Center is undertaking strategic planning to look at its facilities, programs, and services. oo Public access to the water and the natural beauty of the waterfront figures prominently in the Port of Edmonds' plans, including new plazas, improved walkways and public art. Public pedestrian/bicycle access across the railroad tracks to the waterfront, in the vicinity of the south end of the marina, near Marina Beach Park, should remain a high priority. oo Arts plans continue to be implemented throughout the downtown, including such projects as the Edmonds Center for the Arts, the Artworks facility, and the continued expansion of downtown festivals and events. oo Edmonds Community College has expanded its downtown presence through initiatives with the Edmonds Conference Center (formerly the Edmonds Floral Conference Center) and is working with the Edmonds Center for the Arts to enhance overall operations. Downtown/Waterfront Vision. Taken together, the goals and policies for the Downtown/Waterfront Activity Center present a vision for Edmonds downtown/waterfront. By actively pursuing the ferry terminal's relocation, the City has set upon an ambitious and exciting course. It is a course that holds promise for the downtown/waterfront, but it is one that will require concerted action by the entire community, including local, state and federal public officials, business groups and citizens. While the challenges presented in this effort are substantial, the possible rewards are even greater, for with its existing physical assets, future opportunities and the energy of its citizens, Edmonds has the potential to create one of the region's most attractive and vital city centers. Components of the overall vision for the downtown/waterfront area include: oc The Edmonds Crossing multimodal transportation center provides convenient transportation connections for bus, ferry, rail, auto and bicycle riders and makes Edmonds an integrated node in the regional transportation system. The new terminal reduces negative impacts to downtown Edmonds while still providing a link between the 44 Land Use terminal and downtown Edmonds. The project provides the community with varied transportation resources and an economic stimulus to the larger community. 0o Downtown is extended westward and connected to the shoreline by positive mixed -use development as well as by convenient pedestrian routes. Redevelopment of the holding lanes and SR-104 is pursued after the ferry terminal relocates to Point Edwards. 0o The shoreline features a full spectrum of recreational activities, park settings, marina facilities, and supporting uses. 00 There is a more efficient transportation system featuring commuter and passenger trains, increased bus service, pedestrian and bicycle routes, and adequate streets and parking areas. Transportation conflicts and safety issues involving the interaction of rail, ferry, vehicular and pedestrian traffic are resolved. 0o There is a more active and vital setting for new retail, office, entertainment and associated businesses supported by both nearby residents and the larger Edmonds community, and that attracts visitors from throughout the region. 0o The downtown supports a mix of uses, including traditional commercial and multi family development with new mixed -use development types. Single family neighborhoods are a part of this mix of uses, and contribute to the choice of housing and character of downtown. 0o Opportunities for new development and redevelopment reinforce Edmonds' attractive, small town pedestrian -oriented character. Pedestrian -scale building height limits are an important part of this quality of life, and remain in effect. 0o Provide incentives to encourage adaptive reuse as an alternative to redevelopment of historic structures in order to preserve these resources. 0o Auto traffic is rerouted to minimize impact to residential neighborhoods. Downtown/Waterfront Goals and Plan Policies. The following goals and policies are intended to achieve the framework goals for the downtown/waterfront area: Downtown/Waterfront Area Goal A. Promote downtown Edmonds as a setting for retail, office, entertainment and associated businesses supported by nearby residents and the larger Edmonds community, and as a destination for visitors from throughout the region. A.1 Ensure that the downtown/waterfront area continues —and builds on its function as a key identity element for the Edmonds community. A.2 Enhance Edmonds' visual identity by continuing its pedestrian -scale of downtown development, enhancing its shoreline character, and protecting and building on the strong visual quality of the "5th and Main" core. Land Use 45 A.3 Encourage a more active and vital setting for new retail, office, entertainment and associated businesses supported by nearby residents and the larger Edmonds community, downtown commercial activity and visitors from throughout the region. AA Enhance shoreline features to include a full spectrum of recreational activities, park settings, natural features (such as the Edmonds Marsh), and marina facilities. Improve public access to the shoreline and link waterfront features by establishing a continuous esplanade along the shoreline. The esplanade will be constructed over time through public improvements and Shoreline Master Program requirements placed on private development. A.5 Support the development and retention of significant public investments in the downtown/waterfront area, including government and cultural facilities that help draw residents and visitors to downtown. A.6 Provide greater residential opportunities and personal services within the downtown, especially to accommodate the needs of a changing population. Downtown/Waterfront Area Goal B. Continue to plan for and implement improvements in the downtown/waterfront area that resolve safety conflicts while encouraging multi -modal transportation and access to the waterfront. B.1 Future development along the waterfront should support the continuation and compatible design of three regional facilities: Edmonds Crossing at Pt. Edwards; the Port of Edmonds and its master plan; and the regional parks, beaches and walkways making up the public shoreline. B.2 Plan for improvements to resolve transportation and safety conflicts in the downtown/waterfront area. B.3 Provide a more efficient transportation system featuring improved bus service, pedestrian and bicycle routes, and adequate streets and parking areas. Downtown/Waterfront Area Goal C. Continue to plan for and implement the Edmonds Crossing multimodal transportation center at Pt. Edwards — pursuing the design, permitting, land acquisition and development of the project. The completion of Edmonds Crossing will help address the competing needs of three regional facilities (transportation, parks and open space — including the Edmonds Marsh, and the Port of Edmonds) while providing opportunities for redevelopment and linkage between downtown Edmonds and its waterfront. C.1 Utilize the Point Edwards site to its best community and regional potential by developing a multimodal transit center with compatible development in the surrounding area. In addition to the regional benefits arising from its multi modal transportation function, an essential community benefit is in removing intrusive ferry traffic from the core area which serves to visually and physically separate downtown from the waterfront. 46 Land Use C.2 Establish a Point Edwards multimodal transportation center which provides convenient transportation connections for bus, ferry, rail, auto, pedestrians and bicycle riders and makes Edmonds an integrated node in the regional transportation system. The new terminal should be planned to reduce negative impacts to downtown Edmonds — such as grade separation/safety concerns and conflicts with other regional facilities — while providing the community with unique transportation resources and an economic stimulus to the larger community. C.3 Extend Downtown westward and connect it to the shoreline by encouraging mixed - use development and pedestrian -oriented amenities and streetscape improvements, particularly along Dayton and Main Streets. Development in this area should draw on historical design elements found in the historic center of Edmonds to ensure an architectural tie throughout the Downtown Area. Pursue redevelopment of SR-104 and the existing holding lanes once the ferry terminal moves to Point Edwards. CA Improve traffic conditions by removing ferry traffic impacts from the downtown core. Downtown/Waterfront Area Goal D. Define the downtown commercial and retail core along streets having the strongest pedestrian links and pedestrian -oriented design elements, while protecting downtown's identity. D.1 Encourage opportunities for new development and redevelopment which reinforce Edmonds' attractive, small town pedestrian oriented character. Provide incentives to encourage adaptive reuse as an alternative to redevelopment of historic structures in order to preserve these resources. These historic structures are a key component of the small town character of Edmonds and it's economic viability. Height limits that reinforce and require pedestrian -scale development are an important part of this quality of life, and should be implemented through zoning regulations and design guidelines. D.2 Provide for the gradual elimination of large and inadequately landscaped paved areas. D.3 Provide pedestrian -oriented amenities for citizens and visitors throughout the downtown/waterfront area, including such things as: • Weather protection, • Street trees and flower baskets, • Street furniture, • Public art and art integrated into private developments, • Pocket parks, • Signage and other way -finding devices, • Restrooms. Land Use 47 DA Strive for the elimination of overhead wires and poles whenever possible. D.5 Coordinate new building design with old structure restoration and renovation. D.6 Develop sign regulations that support the pedestrian character of downtown, encouraging signage to assist in locating businesses and public and cultural facilities while discouraging obtrusive and garish signage which detracts from downtown pedestrian and cultural amenities. D.7 Provide lighting for streets and public areas that is designed to promote comfort, security, and aesthetic beauty. D.8 Building design should discourage automobile access and curb cuts that interfere with pedestrian activity and break up the streetscape. Encourage the use of alley entrances and courtyards to beautify the back alleys in the commercial and mixed use areas in the downtown area. Downtown/Waterfront Area Goal E. Identify supporting arts and mixed use residential and office areas which support and complement downtown retail use areas. Provide for a strong central retail core at downtown's focal center while providing for a mixture of supporting commercial and residential uses in the area surrounding this retail core area. Emphasize and plan for links between the retail core and these supporting areas. E.1 Support a mix of uses downtown which includes a variety of housing, commercial, and cultural activities. Downtown/Waterfront Area Goal F. Focus development between the commercial and retail core and the Edmonds Center for the Arts on small-scale retail, service, and multi -family residential uses. Downtown/Waterfront Area Goal G. Develop gateway/entrance areas into downtown which serve complementary purposes (e.g. convenience shopping, community activities). Downtown/Waterfront Area Goal H. Explore alternative development opportunities in the waterfront area, such as specifically encouraging arts -related and arts -complementing uses. H.1 Improve and encourage economic development opportunities by providing space for local businesses and cottage industries and undertaking supporting public improvement projects. Of particular significance is the enhancement of economic development opportunities resulting from the Edmonds Crossing project and the enhancement of Edmonds as an arts and water -oriented destination. Multi -modal Transportation. Primary goals of the City's Downtown Waterfront Plan include integrating the downtown core with the waterfront, improving pedestrian access and traffic circulation, and encouraging mixed -use development. Current conditions limit the city's ability to achieve these plan goals by making it difficult to move between the two areas, thereby minimizing the value of the shoreline as a public resource and amenity while adversely affecting the potential for redevelopment. A number of studies and public involvement projects have been completed to determine how to meet the variety of transportation needs that converge within Downtown Edmonds. Following an initial 48 Land Use 1992 Ferry Relocation Feasibility Study and a visioning focus group convened by Edmonds' Mayor in April 1992, the importance of the conflicting transportation needs culminated in the City of Edmonds, Washington State Ferries, and Community Transit signing a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) in November 1993. The MOU called for the cooperative development of solutions to the conflicts between the City's growth plans and ferry traffic in particular. In response to that agreement, preliminary engineering and environmental analysis of alternatives began in late 1993. In 1994, the Edmonds City Council held public hearings on the possibility of relocating the existing ferry terminal and incorporating a new terminal within a larger multimodal project. As a result of the hearings, the Council expressed support for a regional multimodal facility. The Council also approved the 1994 Edmonds Downtown Waterfront Plan which specifically supported the facility's location at Pt. Edwards. Further environmental review and facility definition resulted in a recommendation that an alternative site (other than the existing Main Street location) should be developed as a multimodal facility serving ferry, rail, bus, pedestrian, and bicycle travel needs. Several alternative sites for the relocated ferry terminal and the proposed multimodal center were evaluated as part of the early environmental screening process. During this screening process, federal, state, regional, and local regulatory agencies —including affected Tribes— provided input regarding issues that could impact selecting reasonable alternatives. Based on this extensive screening process, two alternatives were recommended for further analysis in the Environmental Impact Statement process. A Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) was issued on February 25, 1998, and the Final EIS was issued on November 10, 2004. Pt. Edwards is the preferred alternative for a multimodal terminal site. In addition to the transportation benefits of moving the existing ferry terminal, a number of redevelopment opportunities will result within the downtown waterfront area. These range from park and public access improvements to opportunities for significant redevelopment and connections between the waterfront and downtown. Land Use 49 P U E r S0tjm0 CcmroEo (Part bti [Part ar f�hlln9 W.W ke"'4 fGFIV LOW'�re Park (South ChM �� 4 'W-i'41fBfiatkhlYtLondrnp 7arh{Ha") sv�n PWk C E4a+e Pr�lt Figure 11. Integration of the remaining ferry pier structure into surrounding parks will be a key public benefit and opportunity. 50 Land Use Edmonds Crossing. Edmonds Crossing is a multimodal transportation center proposed to be constructed at Point Edwards, the former UNOCAL oil storage facility south of the Edmonds Marina. This multimodal transportation center will provide the capacity to respond to growth while providing improved opportunities for connecting various forms of travel, including rail, ferry, bus, bicycle, walking and ridesharing. The project is supported by local, regional, and state plans, including the Puget Sound Regional Council's Destination 2030 Metropolitan Transportation and VISION 2040 plan; Washington State Ferries' (WSF) System Plan for 1999-2018; Snohomish County's countywide Transportation Plan; the City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan; and the Port of Edmonds Strategic Plan and Master Plan. Edmonds Crossing will provide: oo Intersection improvements at Pine Street and SR-104; oo Interconnection of Amtrak service to Chicago and Vancouver, B.C., Sounder commuter rail service between Everett and Seattle, and other regional transportation modes; oo Connections to the regional transit system with direct bus service to communities throughout the urban growth area; oo Enhanced ability for people to rideshare, bicycle and walk to connect with travel opportunities at the multimodal center; oo Improved safety and travel on Edmonds local streets and along SR-104 between the ferry terminal and I-5. oo Linkage between Navy facilities at Everett and on the Kitsap peninsula. Land Use 51 Figure 12. Edmonds C alternative from the Luu4 PLAY FeMl 9pnPr`. a5�i �� tigJ ■ y [} } PGIlcpr UPMAL F4& ito to -0rvvw) Manna Ba park 5nonM wdkw M SOR taL+TM+ar�hvran �.. w« C F � 7,+rtur[artf i imrtxq' 1 °rp °� i RW*m — wprm •�� hwp £logs mJM1 of �',t��il•Af G�rJ+1� 16rL_ } 8•d �eey Gy1� FauraS�Y E&nor % ,koar4ig hlesyl! M1�J f � w�rfe c e tie' 52 Land Use The project includes: oo A ferry terminal; oo A train station; oo A transit center for bus and regional transit, as well as the opportunity for riders to connect to downtown businesses via a local circulator service; oo The flexibility to operate the facility to respond to changing travel demands; oo Safety features including grade separation of train traffic from other modes of travel, designated vehicle parking and holding areas, and improved passenger waiting areas. While the Edmonds Crossing project will directly benefit the transportation system, the project will also provide significant benefits to downtown Edmonds. Completion of the project provides an opportunity to redevelop the existing ferry terminal facilities and the related holding lanes in the downtown area. Providing a connection from the new multimodal terminal to downtown Edmonds will potentially bring more visibility and visitors to the downtown area. Plan Policies and Implementation Strategy. The vision and goals for Downtown Waterfront uinh,4�r Downtown f � f�rJT red x urm C'wr�nro Pia iCJfr�r�+q�JrarJff d'l I J— rr//l+' rYJRR JfaJAi rri O■or.#� Design{r}{rlA'.ilFYlFfl2' J'enJnr r uY rrYFTI fYiY�' rwUY I M* ' ti�rylr�ru�r.e� t pmkgrOunrnJnfCC✓'jgmR WdirtrffYil.'! f"rJrftrJkfefl' � ka '-"♦ ru "�1PsnJrJr { iwQfr! �� * +i 000 .' ■_ ' i� _ j F� ncos I ,�{'x-,Sl:fllin7[xfiaf ■■'F COrµonC� � ' T'+nrJJkl� • ■ f IeYTaI[ � FLrq � - '� �,xl{Jfi({ 'CJ4X1'r . - ffiJJr�rruf��'iiJ1f ■ Jir4 i �J[YJ<�.Ylf�fllrw[f11�' i�Y'MR�p #' - tr! iirPlf+lflp A y ■ .4rn ('FRTYdor.' j - 3rn,7FwOk1r [.onner'Ofm —' — GrilelkaY.S' f �: ' � - #k+fifNriilrt i'VrJrJrY:�rrl'J � 'i'SYAY PILM OtAlja7 ib, - _ r�'r�yS[ifJ�'7�d7f Gf Jr+7fJN 7YrJ'd Land Use 53 Activity Center are designed to present a coherent vision for future development in the area. To implement this vision, a series of policies and an implementation strategy are intended to guide future public and private actions. Implementation Strategy. Key issues tied to the viability and health of the downtown waterfront area include using the Edmonds Crossing project to help resolve transportation issues, linking downtown with the waterfront, and taking advantage of redevelopment opportunities arising from emerging trends and public investments. The largest single factor affecting the downtown waterfront area is the timing and construction of the Edmonds Crossing project. Because of this, a two -phased downtown waterfront redevelopment strategy is envisioned. The first phase includes actions taken before the existing ferry terminal is relocated to the Pt. Edwards site, and is intended to include actions taken to support ongoing redevelopment and arts -related improvements downtown. This phase will also set the framework for subsequent redevelopment after the terminal's relocation. The second phase is aimed at comprehensive redevelopment to link the downtown with the waterfront, better utilize shoreline resources, increase economic viability and provide the setting for a broad range of community functions. Short Term Actions. Short term actions are those actions that can take place prior to construction of the Edmonds Crossing project. 1. Develop a short term plan and strategy to address transportation conflicts and safety issues involving the interaction of rail, ferry, vehicular and pedestrian traffic in the waterfront area. 2. Plan for the Edmonds Crossing project at Pt. Edwards which includes relocation of the existing ferry terminal. Planning should also include reuse of the current ferry terminal and related holding area. 3. Improve the existing downtown rail station between Dayton and Main Streets in order to better accommodate inter -city passenger and commuter rail service, including provisions for bus and commuter traffic as well as pedestrian connections to the waterfront and downtown. During the short term planning period, evaluate the feasibility and benefits of retaining a commuter rail and transit presence downtown after the construction of Edmonds Crossing. 4. Plan for future joint public/private development of the area between SR-104 and the railroad tracks. Planning activities could potentially include infrastructure planning, property acquisition, parking management, development incentives and guidelines or modifications to land use regulations (such as zoning or master planning). Although Amtrak and commuter rail service will be included as a part of the Edmonds Crossing project, the City and transit service providers should examine whether a commuter rail stop can be retained between Dayton and Main Streets in order to provide improved service and stimulate potential redevelopment of the surrounding area. 5. Upgrade secondary downtown streets for pedestrians. Implement the city's public urban design plan and street tree plan while expanding public amenities and streetscape improvements in areas where these do not already exist. These improvements are particularly needed along Main and Dayton Streets in the area between downtown and the waterfront in order to improve pedestrian connections between downtown and the waterfront area. Pedestrian improvements should be combined with traffic improvement projects where applicable. 54 Land Use 6. Continue to promote shoreline management and public access to the city's beaches, parks, and walkways. 7. Continue implementing a continuous shoreline walkway (boardwalk/esplanade) from Brackett's Landing North to Point Edwards. Work with the Port of Edmonds to integrate recreation and marina functions into the long term plan. 8. Work with the Senior Center to plan for long term needs for the senior center facilities and programs. 9. Encourage a variety of housing to be developed as part of new development and redevelopment of downtown properties. Housing should be provided to serve a diverse community, including single family homes, multi family apartments and condominiums, housing as part of mixed use developments, and housing connected with live/work developments that could also encourage an arts - oriented community in the downtown area. A special focus for arts -supporting live/work arrangements could be in the corridor and nearby residential areas linking downtown with the Edmonds Center for the Arts. 10. Begin improvements to mitigate ferry terminal traffic (and other traffic) increases, as envisioned in the Edmonds Crossing project and the transportation element of the comprehensive plan. 11. Develop "gateways" at key entrances to the downtown area which enhance the identity and sense of place for downtown. Gateways should signal that visitors are entering downtown Edmonds, and should include elements such as public art, landscaping, signage and directional ("way -finding") aids. Long Term Actions. Long term actions are those actions that can take place during or after construction of the Edmonds Crossing project. Complete a multi modal transportation center at Point Edwards for: oo Rail (inter -city and commuter) oo Ferry oo Park & Ride/Auto oo Bus oo Pedestrian and shuttle connections to other features and amenities. 2. Complete redevelopment of the Point Edwards site consistent with an overall master plan that provides for development compatible with the Edmonds Crossing project. 3. Coordinate circulation and public parking with Port development. 4. Continue to protect and enhance existing wetlands and continue to develop supporting non - intrusive interpretive trails and exhibits. 5. Continue development of a "necklace" of shoreline parks with improvements, focusing on missing links in the park and walkway system. Retain and expand existing parks, providing linkages whenever property acquisitions or easements become available for public use. 6. Encourage the development of centralized parking facilities as part of redevelopment projects. Under the right circumstances, these types of facilities can provide an efficient mechanism for consolidating expensive parking improvements while freeing up land for more intensive and desirable Land Use 55 uses that support local housing, commercial, and pedestrian activities. Public/private partnerships should be explored when the opportunity arises, both in private and public projects (e.g. the commuter rail station downtown). Centralized parking facilities could be built as part of a master - planned mixed -use development. 7. Redevelop the existing ferry terminal site at the base of Main Street according to a master plan after the existing ferry terminal has been relocated to Point Edwards. This is a unique location, situated in the midst of a continuous park and beach setting, and provides opportunities for public/private partnerships. Ideas to be pursued include public "festival" entertainment or activity space, visitor moorage, park and public walkways, and other uses that would encourage this as to become a destination drawing people from south along the waterfront and eastward up into downtown. Redevelopment of this area should be done in a manner that is sensitive to and enhances the views down Main Street and from the adjoining parks and public areas. 8. Redevelop the area from the east side of SR-104 to the railroad tracks, from Harbor Square to Main Street, according to a mixed use master plan. This area could provide a significant opportunity for public/private partnerships. Under the right circumstances, consolidated parking or a pedestrian crossing to the waterfront could be possible as part of a redevelopment project. Every opportunity should be taken to improve the pedestrian streetscape in this area in order to encourage pedestrian activity and linkages between downtown and the waterfront. Uses developed along public streets should support pedestrian activity and include amenities such as street trees, street furniture, flowers and mini parks. Main and Dayton Streets should receive special attention for public art or art integrated into private developments to reinforce the visual arts theme for downtown. Redevelopment of this area should also take advantage of the ability to reconfigure and remove the ferry holding lanes paralleling SR-104 once the Edmonds Crossing project is developed. 9. Support redevelopment efforts that arise out of planning for the long term needs of the senior center. These plans should reinforce the center's place in the public waterfront, linking the facility to the walkways and parks along the shoreline. 10. New development and redevelopment in the downtown waterfront area should be designed to meet overall design objectives and the intent of the various "districts" described for the downtown area. Downtown Waterfront Districts. In addition to the goals and policies for the downtown waterfront area, the Comprehensive Plan Map depicts a number of districts in the downtown waterfront area. These districts are described below. Retail Core. The area immediately surrounding the fountain at 5"' and Main and extending along Main Street and Fifth Avenue is considered the historic center of Edmonds and building heights shall be pedestrian in scale and compatible with the historic character of this area. To encourage a vibrant downtown, first floor spaces should be designed with adequate ceiling height to accommodate a range of retail and commercial uses and the entry situated at street level. Uses are encouraged to be retail -compatible (i.e. retail or compatible service — e.g. art galleries, restaurants, real estate sales offices and similar uses that provide storefront windows and items for sale to the public that can be viewed from the street). The street front fagades of buildings must provide a high percentage of transparent window area and pedestrian weather protection along public sidewalks. Design guidelines should provide for pedestrian -scale design features, 56 Land Use differentiating the lower, commercial floor from the upper floors of the building. Buildings situated around the fountain square must be orientated to the fountain and its associated pedestrian area. Arts Center Corridor. The corridor along 4th Ave N between the retail core and the Edmonds Center for the Performing Arts. To encourage a vibrant downtown, first floor spaces should be designed with adequate ceiling height to accommodate a range of retail and commercial uses, with commercial entries being located at street level. Building design and height shall be compatible with the goal of creating a pedestrian oriented arts corridor while providing incentives for the adaptive reuse of existing historic structures. Building entries for commercial buildings must provide pedestrian weather protection. Design guidelines should provide for pedestrian - scale design features, differentiating the lower floor from the upper floors of the building. The design of interior commercial spaces must allow for flexible commercial space, so that individual business spaces can be provided with individual doorways and pedestrian access directly to the public sidewalk. The streetscape should receive special attention, using trees, landscaping, and public art to encourage pedestrian activity. Private development projects should also be encouraged to integrate art into their building designs. Where single family homes still exist in this area, development regulations should allow for "live -work" arrangements where the house can accommodate both a business and a residence as principal uses. Uses supporting the arts center should be encouraged — such as restaurants, cafes, galleries, live/work use arrangements, and B&Bs. Downtown Mixed Commercial. To encourage a vibrant downtown, first floor spaces should be designed with adequate ceiling height to accommodate a range of retail and commercial uses., with commercial entries at street level. Buildings can be built to the property line. Building heights shall be compatible with the goal of achieving pedestrian scale development. The first floor of buildings must provide pedestrian weather protection along public sidewalks. Design guidelines should provide for pedestrian -scale design features, differentiating the lower, commercial floor from the upper floors of the building. The design of interior commercial spaces must allow for flexible commercial space, so that individual business spaces can be provided with individual doorways and pedestrian access directly to the public sidewalk. When the rear of a property adjoins a residentially -designated property, floor area that is located behind commercial street frontage may be appropriate for residential use. Where single family homes still exist in this area, development regulations should allow for "live -work" arrangements where the house can accommodate both a business and a residence as principal uses. Downtown Mixed Residential. In this area, commercial uses would be allowed but not required (i.e. buildings could be entirely commercial or entirely residential, or anything in between). Height and design of buildings shall conform to the standards of the Downtown Mixed Commercial District. Buildings facing the Dayton Street corridor should provide a pedestrian - friendly streetscape, providing pedestrian amenities and differentiating the ground floor from upper building levels. Downtown Master Plan. The properties between SR-104 and the railroad, including Harbor Square, the Edmonds Shopping Center (former Safeway site), and extending past the Commuter Rail parking area up to Main Street. This area is appropriate for design -driven master planned development which provides for a mix of uses and takes advantage of its strategic location between the waterfront and downtown. The location of existing taller buildings on the waterfront, and the site's situation at the bottom of "the Bowl," could enable a design that provides for higher buildings outside current view corridors. Any redevelopment in this area should be oriented to the street fronts, and provide pedestrian -friendly walking areas, especially along Dayton and Main Streets. Development design should also not ignore the railroad side of the properties, since this is Land Use 57 an area that provides a "first impression" of the city from railroad passengers and visitors to the waterfront. Art work, landscaping, and modulated building design should be used throughout any redevelopment project. Shoreline Commercial. The waterfront, west of the railroad tracks between the public beaches and the Port (currently zoned CW). Consistent with the City's Shoreline Master Program, this area should allow a mix of public uses, supporting commercial uses, and water -oriented and water -dependent uses. Building heights shall be compatible with the goal of achieving pedestrian scale development while providing incentives to encourage public view corridors. Roof and building forms should be an important consideration in design guidelines for this area, because of its high sensitivity and proximity to public open spaces. Redevelopment should result in singular, landmark buildings of high quality design which take advantage of the visibility and physical environment of their location, and which contribute to the unique character of the waterfront. Pedestrian amenities and weather protection must be provided for buildings located along public walkways and street fronts. Master Plan Development. The waterfront area south of Olympic Beach, including the Port of Edmonds and the Point Edwards and multi modal developments. This area is governed by master plans for the Port of Edmonds, Point Edwards, and the Edmonds Crossing project as described in an FEIS issued on November 10, 2004. These areas are also developed consistent with the City's Shoreline Master Program, as it applies. Downtown Convenience Commercial. This is the south end of 5th Ave, south of Walnut. Commercial uses would be required on the first floor, but auto -oriented uses would be permitted in addition to general retail and service uses. To encourage a vibrant downtown, first floor spaces should be designed with adequate ceiling height to accommodate a range of retail and commercial uses. Weather protection would still be required, but to a lesser degree than the retail core and only when the building was adjacent to the sidewalk. Height and design of buildings shall conform to the standards of the Downtown Mixed Commercial District. When the rear of a property adjoins a residentially -designated property, floor area that is located behind the commercial street frontage may be appropriate for residential use. Planned Residential -Office. Several properties lie along the railroad on the west side of Sunset Ave between existing commercial zoning and Edmonds Street. This area is appropriate for small- scale development which provides for a mix of limited office and residential uses which provide a transition between the more intensive commercial uses along Main Street and the residential uses along Sunset Ave. Because the area of this designation is located adjacent to commercial development to the south, the railroad to the west, and is near both multiple family and single- family residential development, this area should act as a transition between theses uses. Building design for this area should be sensitive to the surrounding commercial, multiple family and single-family character. Downtown Design Objectives. As a companion to the districts outlined above, general design objectives are included for the downtown waterfront area. These objectives are intended to encourage high quality, well designed projects to be developed in the downtown/waterfront area that reflect the values of the citizens of Edmonds. These design objectives can be found in the Urban Design section of this document. 58 Land Use Medical/Highway 99 Activity Center and Highway 99 Corridor Medical/Highway 99 Vision. The Medical/Highway 99 activity center is intended to encourage the development of a pedestrian and transit oriented area focused on two master planned developments, Swedish/Edmonds medical center and Edmonds-Woodway High School, with a related high -intensity development corridor along Highway 99. Highway 99 is characterized by a corridor of generally commercial development with less intense uses or designed transitions serving as a buffer between adjacent neighborhoods. In contrast, the overall character of the mixed use activity center is intended to be an intensively developed mixed use, pedestrian -friendly environment, in which buildings are linked by walkways served by centralized parking, and plantings and landscaping promote pedestrian activity and a park -like atmosphere. In addition to the general goals for activity centers, the Medical/Highway 99 activity center is intended to achieve the following goals: Medical/Highway 99 Activity Center Goals and Plan Policies. The following goals and policies are intended to achieve the framework goals for the Medical/Highway 99 Activity Center. Medical/Highway 99 Activity Center Goal A. Expand the economic and tax base of the City of Edmonds by providing incentives for business and commercial redevelopment in a planned activity center. Medical/Highway 99 Activity Center Goal B. Provide for an aesthetically pleasing business and residential community consisting of a mixed use, pedestrian -friendly atmosphere of attractively designed and landscaped surroundings and inter -connected development. B.1 Encourage a more active and vital setting for new retail, office, and service businesses, supported by nearby residents and visitors from other parts of the region. B.2 Provide street trees, buffers, and landscape treatments which encourage and support an attractive mixed use pattern of development characterized by pedestrian walkways and centralized parking. Use these same features, in concert with site and building design, to provide a transition from higher -intensity mixed use development to nearby single family residential areas. B.3 Provide a pleasant experience for pedestrians and motorists along major streets and in a planned activity center, and provide a gateway along 212th Street SW into the City of Edmonds. Medical/Highway 99 Activity Center Goal C. Recognize and plan for the distinct difference in opportunities and development character provided by the Highway 99 corridor versus the local travel and access patterns on local streets. C.1 Uses adjoining the Highway 99 Corridor should provide more intensive levels of mixed use development, including higher building heights and greater density. However, pedestrian linkages to other portions of the activity center — and adjoining focus areas along the Highway 99 Corridor — should still be provided in order to assist pedestrian circulation and provide access to transit. Land Use 59 Medical/Highway 99 Activity Center Goal D. Promote the development of a mixed use area served by transit and accessible to pedestrians. D.1 Provide a more efficient transportation system featuring increased bus service, pedestrian and bicycle routes as well as adequate streets and parking areas. Transit service should be coordinated by transit providers and take advantage of links to future high -capacity transit that develops along corridors such as Highway 99. Medical/Highway 99 Activity Center Goal E.To provide a buffer between the high -intensity, high- rise commercial areas along SR 99 and the established neighborhoods and public facilities west of 76th Avenue West. E.1 Support a mix of uses without encroaching into single family neighborhoods. Uses adjoining single family neighborhoods should provide transitions between more intensive uses areas through a combination of building design, landscaping and visual buffering, and pedestrian -scale streetscape design. Medical/Highway 99 Activity Center Goal F.To discourage the expansion of strip commercial development and encourage a cohesive and functional activity center that allows for both neighborhood conservation and targeted redevelopment that includes an appropriate mix of single family and multiple dwelling units, offices, retail, and business uses, along with public facilities. F.1 In some cases, heavy commercial development (e.g. wholesale or light industrial uses) may still be appropriate where these uses are separated from residential uses. Medical/Highway 99 Activity Center Goal G. To provide an integrated network of pedestrian and bicycle circulation that connects within and through the activity center to existing residential areas, the high school, the hospital, and transit services and facilities. G.1 Development should be designed for both pedestrian and transit access. 60 Land Use Highway 99 Corridor Vision. Highway 99 occupies a narrow strip of retail and commercial uses bounded by residential neighborhoods. Historically, the corridor has developed in a patchwork of uses, without a clear focus or direction. To improve planning for the future of the corridor, the City established a task force in 2003-2004, resulting in the Highway 99 Enhancement Report and a related economic analysis. During this process, local residents were contacted and asked to participate in two focus groups to identify current problems and future aspirations for the corridor. After this preliminary survey with the residents, the City invited business owners to participate in two charrette meetings to brainstorm ideas and evaluate possible ways to induce redevelopment in the area. After concepts were developed, Berk & Associates, an economics consultant, performed a market assessment of the enhancement strategy. The following diagram summarizes the general approach that resulted from this work: a series of focus areas providing identity and a clustering of activity along the corridor, providing opportunities for improved economic development while also improving linkages between the corridor and surrounding residential areas. Focus Areas along the Corridor Four thcntcs -Lnd four areas emerged as part icu]ardy iotercnt6tg ak0ng the corridur. Lich one ul'lkw areas rcpnr� cnts �-N sub sV"ICrn wII€r spcci fit tralfit, :iuce.;s and pcdesirian dumw leris t ici as well as deveInprncitt gnak and Charaetcr_ 216" S1 Hospitaf Corr muoiry er7(1 Farndy Retail Center e2!}" St From the north to the south %w "lnferrra6onar Distrlcl" rccugnire the COI IOW in1 arcaS: 'rhe Hospital crrntmunity And Vamil)- Rcl:til Center; 23T; St • T€ L "International District" -AmkL • T€ L Rusidential Area 2341• Sf RcNil CvPtt4•r: 2.361 Si — • Th L ['irIII nieruial RcdcvcIoilnlcn011ofeds 238' StA Improvement Area. ?4W' Sf 224" Sf 212" S1 Resoder;teal A rea Relari cerrfer Commercial Retie velopmenvHolets �r P(Ovemenf Area Land Use 61 Highway 99 Corridor Goals and Plan Policies. The following goals and policies are intended to achieve the framework goals for the Highway 99 Corridor. Highway 99 Corridor Goal A. Improve access and circulation. Access to businesses for both pedestrians and automobiles is difficult along major portions of the corridor. The inability of pedestrians to cross the street and for automobiles to make safe turns is a critical limitation on enhanced development of the corridor into a stronger economic area. Better pedestrian crossings are also needed to support transit use, especially as Highway 99 becomes the focus of future high capacity transit initiatives. A.1 Provide for pedestrian access and circulation within development focus areas, while coordinating with high -capacity transit along the Highway 99 corridor. A.2 Use traffic signals, access management, and rechannelization to facilitate pedestrian, business, and residential access while maintaining traffic capacity along SR 99. The City should work collaboratively with WSDOT on these issues, and to develop a circulation management plan. In some cases the impacts of the traffic signals can be enhanced by access management, rechannelization and other measures. A.3 Make the corridor more attractive and pedestrian -friendly (e.g., add trees and landscaping) through a combination of development requirements and — when available — public investment. A.4 Route auto traffic to encourage efficient access to new and existing development while minimizing impacts to surrounding residential neighborhoods. Highway 99 Corridor Goal B. The City should consider the different sections along the corridor and emphasize their unique opportunities rather than view the corridor as an undifferentiated continuum. Street improvements and, in some cases regulatory measures can encourage these efforts. Focus on specific nodes or segments within the corridor. Identity elements such as signage should indicate that the corridor is within the City of Edmonds, and show how connections can be made to downtown and other Edmonds locations. B.1 New development should be high -quality and varied — not generic — and include amenities for pedestrians and patrons. B.2 The City will encourage the retention of commercial uses which provide high economic benefit to the city, such as new auto dealerships, and encourage these types of uses to locate within the Highway 99 Corridor. When these uses are proposed to be located within one of the corridor focus areas, these uses should also comply with the goals and policies outlined for each focus area. 62 Land Use B.3 Provide a system of "focus areas" along the corridor which provide opportunities for clusters of development, or themed development areas. Providing focus points for development is intended to help encourage segmentation of the long Highway 99 corridor into distinct activity nodes which will encourage an Edmonds character and identity for the corridor. Concepts for the different focus areas identified in the "Highway 99 Corridor Vision" include the following: The "Hospital Community and Family Retail Center" would be positioned to take advantage of its proximity to the many hospital and related medical services in the area and it would be easily reachable from the Interurban trail. The idea of an `International District" is organized around the international flavor of development in the area combined with the concepts of visibility and internal connection. Access to the "District" is marked by specific gateways, and the many focal points for activity in the area (and the new development in between) are connected with a strong pedestrian corridor. The "Residential Area Retail Center" concept allows for mixed use development while providing access and services to adjacent residential neighborhoods. Similar mixed use development, linked to surrounding neighborhoods, could occur in the "Commercial Redevelopment/Hotels Improvement Area. " In addition, this area has the potential to provide large sites suitable for larger commercial or mixed use development, such as hotels or large retail complexes. Internal circulation between sites is a key to development. Land Use 63 Highway 99 Corridor Goal C. Encourage development that is sensitive to surrounding neighborhoods. During the City's Highway 99 Task Force work, residents noted that they needed a number of services that are not presently provided along the corridor. This can provide an opportunity that might be part of a larger business strategy. At the same time, new development should contribute to the residential quality of the adjacent neighborhoods. C.1 Protect residential qualities and connect businesses with the local community. Pedestrian connections should be made available as part of new development to connect residents to appropriate retail and service uses. C.2 New development should be allowed and encouraged to develop to the fullest extent possible while assuring that the design quality and amenities provided contribute to the overall character and quality of the corridor. Where intense development adjoins residential areas, site design (including buffers, landscaping, and the arrangement of uses) and building design should be used to minimize adverse impacts on residentially -zoned properties C.3 Provide adequate buffering between higher intensity uses and adjoining residential neighborhoods Highway 99 Corridor Goal D. Encourage a variety of uses and building types. A variety of uses and building types is appropriate to take advantage of different opportunities and conditions. For example, a tall hotel or large scale retail development may be an excellent addition to the south of the corridor while some small restaurants and convenience shops might cater to hospital employees, trail users and local residents near 216th Street SW. Where needed, the City should consider zoning changes to encourage mixed use or taller development to occur. D.1 Upgrade the architectural and landscape design qualities of the corridor. Establish uniform signage regulations for all properties within the corridor area which provide for business visibility and commerce while minimizing clutter and distraction to the public. D.2 Within the Corridor, hghrise nodes should be located to provide for maximum economic use of suitable commercial land. Highrise nodes should be: D.2.a Supported by adequate services and facilities; D.2.b Designed to provide a visual asset to the community through the use of distinctive forms and materials, articulated facades, attractive landscaping, and similar techniques. D.2.c Designed to take advantage of different forms of access, including automobile, transit and pedestrian access. D.2.d Designed to provide adequate buffering from lower intensity uses and residential neighborhoods. 64 Land Use Master Planned Development Master Planned Developments are areas dominated by a special set of circumstances which allow for a highly coordinated, planned development, with phasing over time. These master plans describe a special purpose and need for the facilities and uses identified, and provide a clear design which fits with the character of their surroundings. The master plans describe the land use parameters and relationships to guide future development on the sites (height, bulk, types and arrangements of uses, access and circulation). All development within areas identified in each master plan shall be consistent with the provisions of the master plan. When located within a designated activity center, development within a master plan area shall be consistent with the goals and policies identified for the surrounding activity center. The following Master Plans are adopted by reference: A. Edmonds-Woodway High School B. City Park C. Pine Ridge Park D. Southwest County Park hi addition to the master plans listed above, master plans can also be implemented through zoning contracts or other implementation actions, rather than being adopted as part of the plan. In these cases, the master plan must still be consistent with the comprehensive plan goals and policies for the area. Residential Development General. The City of Edmonds is unique among cities in Washington State. Located on the shores of Puget Sound, it has been able to retain (largely through citizen input) a small town, quality atmosphere rare for cities so close to major urban centers. The people of Edmonds value these amenities and have spoken often in surveys and meetings over the years. The geographical location also influences potential growth of Edmonds. Tucked between Lynnwood, Mountlake Terrace and Puget Sound, the land available for annexation and development is limited. Living standards in Edmonds are high, and this combined with the limited development potential, provides the opportunity for constructive policy options to govern future development. This will ensure an even better quality of life for its citizens. Edmonds consists of a mixture of people of all ages, incomes and living styles. It becomes a more humane and interesting city as it makes room for and improves conditions for all citizens. When the City's first comprehensive plan completed under the State Growth Management Act was adopted in 1995, the City adopted plan designations for single family areas that were based in large measure on historical development patterns, which often recognized development limitations due to environmentally sensitive areas (slopes, landslide hazards, streams, etc.). In 2004, the City refined its land use and zoning maps to more closely relate its large lot zoning to existing critical areas patterns. City staff analyzed the pattern of critical areas Land Use 65 compared with land use designations, and applied the following logic to identify areas that could and could not be justified for continuing to be designated for large lot single family development. Land use and zoning designations were adjusted during the 2004/2005 plan update process to provide for this increased level of consistency. 66 Land Use Residential Goal A. High quality residential development which is appropriate to the diverse lifestyle of Edmonds residents should be maintained and promoted. The options available to the City to influence the quality of housing for all citizens should be approached realistically in balancing economic and aesthetic considerations, in accordance with the following policies: A.1 Encourage those building custom homes to design and construct homes with architectural lines which enable them to harmonize with the surroundings, adding to the community identity and desirability. A.2 Protect neighborhoods from incompatible additions to existing buildings that do not harmonize with existing structures in the area. A.3 Minimize encroachment on view of existing homes by new construction or additions to existing structures. AA Support retention and rehabilitation of older housing within Edmonds whenever it is economically feasible. A.5 Protect residential areas from incompatible land uses through the careful control of other types of development and expansion based upon the following principles: A.5.a Residential privacy is a fundamental protection to be upheld by local government. A.5.b Traffic not directly accessing residences in a neighborhood must be discouraged. A.5.c Stable property values must not be threatened by view, traffic or land use encroachments. A.5.d Private property must be protected from adverse environmental impacts of development including noise, drainage, traffic, slides, etc. A.6 Require that new residential development be compatible with the natural constraints of slopes, soils, geology, vegetation and drainage. Residential Goal B. A broad range of housing types and densities should be encouraged in order that a choice of housing will be available to all Edmonds residents, in accordance with the following policies: B.1 Planned Residential Development. Provide options for planned residential development solutions for residential subdivisions. B. La Encourage single-family homes in a PRD configuration where significant benefits for owner and area can be demonstrated (trees, view, open space, etc). B. Lb Consider attached single-family dwelling units in PRD's near downtown and shopping centers as an alternative to multiple family zoning. Land Use 67 B.2 Multiple. The City's development policies encourage high quality site and building design to promote coordinated development and to preserve the trees, topography and other natural features of the site. Stereotyped, boxy multiple unit residential (RM) buildings are to be avoided. B.2.a Location Policies. B.2.a.i. RM uses should be located near arterial or collector streets. B.2.b Compatibility Policies. B.2. b. i RM developments should preserve the privacy and view of surrounding buildings, wherever feasible. B.2. b. ii The height of RM buildings that abut single family residential (RS) zones shall be similar to the height permitted in the abutting RS zone except where the existing vegetation and/or change in topography can substantially screen one use from another. B.2. b. iii The design of RM buildings located next to RS zones should be similar to the design idiom of the single family residence. B.2.c. General Design Policies. B.2.c.i The nonstructural elements of the building (such as decks, lights, rails, doors, windows and window easements, materials, textures and colors) should be coordinated to carry out a unified design concept. B.2.c.ii Site and building plans should be designed to preserve the natural features (trees, streams, topography, etc) of the site rather than forcing the site to meet the needs of the imposed plan. B.3 Mobile Homes. Update design standards to ensure quality parks heavily landscaped both for screening exterior and for appearance of interior. Commercial Land Use General. Past and present commercial development in the City of Edmonds has been oriented primarily to serving the needs of its citizens. It also has attempted to offer a unique array of personalized and specialty type shopping opportunities for the public. In the downtown area, the Milltown shopping arcade is an excellent example of this type of development. It is essential that future commercial developments continue to harmonize and enhance the residential small town character of Edmonds that its citizens so strongly desire to retain. By the same token, the City should develop a partnership with business, citizens and residents to help it grow and prosper while assisting to meet the various requirements of the City's codes and policies. The Highway 99 arterial has been recognized historically as a commercial district which adds to the community's tax and employment base. Its economic vitality is important to Edmonds and should be supported. Commercial development in this area is to be encouraged to its maximum potential. Commercial Development Goals and Plan Policies. The following sections describe the general 68 Land Use goals and policies for all commercial areas (commercial, community commercial, neighborhood commercial, Westgate Corridor, Edmonds Way Corridor, and sexually oriented businesses), followed by the additional goals and policies that specific commercial areas must also meet. Commercial Development Goal A. Commercial development in Edmonds shall be located to take advantage of its unique locational opportunities while being consistent and compatible with the character of its surrounding neighborhood. All commercial development should be designed and located so that it is economically feasible to operate a business and provide goods and services to Edmonds residents and tourists in a safe, convenient and attractive manner, in accordance with the following policies: A.1 A sufficient number of sites suited for a variety of commercial uses should be identified and reserved for these purposes. The great majority of such sites should be selected from parcels of land already identified in the comprehensive plan for commercial use and/or zoned for such use. A.2 Parcels of land previously planned or zoned for commercial use but which are now or will be identified as unnecessary, or inappropriate for such use by additional analysis, should be reclassified for other uses. A.3 The proliferation of strip commercial areas along Edmonds streets and highways and the development of commercial uses poorly related to surrounding land uses should be strongly discouraged. A.4 The design and location of all commercial sites should provide for convenient and safe access for customers, employees and suppliers. A.5 All commercial developments should be carefully located and designed to eliminate or minimize the adverse impacts of heavy traffic volume and other related problems on surrounding land uses. A.6 Special consideration should be given to major land use decisions made in relation to downtown Edmonds. Commercial Development Goal B. Community Commercial areas are comprised of commercial development serving a dual purpose: services and shopping for both local residents and regional traffic. The intent of the community commercial designation is to recognize both of these purposes by permitting a range of business and mixed use development while maintaining a neighborhood scale and design character. B.1 Permit uses in community commercial areas that serve both the local neighborhood and regional through -traffic. B.2 Provide for transit and pedestrian access in addition to the need to accommodate automobile traffic. B.3 Provide for the pedestrian -scale design of buildings that are two stories or less in height and that contain architectural features that promote pedestrian activity. Land Use 69 B.4 Provide pedestrian walkways and transit connections throughout the community commercial area, assuring connections to nearby residential neighborhoods. Commercial Development Goal C. Neighborhood Commercial areas are intended to provide a mix of services, shopping, gathering places, office space, and housing for local neighborhoods. The scale of development and intensity of uses should provide a middle ground between the more intense commercial uses of the Highway 99 Corridor/ Medical area and the Downtown Activity Area. Historically, many of the neighborhood commercial areas in Edmonds have developed as classically auto -oriented commercial "strip malls" with one- and two-story developments primarily including retail and service uses. Throughout the region, neighborhood commercial areas are departing from this historical model by being redeveloped as appealing mixed -use clusters, providing attractive new pedestrian -oriented development that expands the uses and services available to local residents. C.1 Neighborhood commercial development should be located at major arterial intersections and should be designed to minimize interference with through traffic. C.2 Permit uses in neighborhood commercial areas that are intended to serve the local neighborhood. Mixed use development should be encouraged within neighborhood commercial areas. C.3 Provide for transit and pedestrian access, with the provision of facilities for local automobile traffic. Provide for pedestrian connections to nearby residential neighborhoods. CA Allow a variety of architectural styles while encouraging public art and sustainable development practices that support pedestrian activity and provide for appealing gathering places. C.5 Significant attention should be paid to the design of ground level commercial spaces, which must accommodate a variety of commercial uses, have street -level entrances, and storefront facades that are dominated by transparent windows. C.6 Encourage neighborhood commercial areas to reflect the identity and character of individual neighborhoods, thus are strengthening their importance as neighborhood centers. Neighborhood commercial areas may set additional specific goals for their community in order to further refine the specific identity they wish to achieve. Goals and policies for specific neighborhood centers are detailed below. C.6.a Five Corners C.6.a.i In the Five Corners neighborhood commercial area, development should be oriented to the street and respond to the unique character of the intersection, including a planned intersection improvement. Parking should be provided at the rear of development, where possible, or underground. C.6.a.ii Development shall not be more than four stories in height, and the design should focus on breaking up the mass and bulk of buildings by incorporating such features as setbacks, varying rooflines, and landscaping into the design of the site. The mix of uses should include not less than one quarter commercial space. 70 Land Use C.6.a.iiiAt a minimum, commercial uses should be located on the ground level of development. Commercial or residential uses may occupy upper levels. C.6.a.iv. As a major intersection, streetscape and way -finding design should create an attractive `gateway" to the downtown and other neighborhoods. (Link to streetscape plan update) Intersection and street design should accommodate and encourage pedestrian connections throughout the neighborhood commercial area. C.6.b. Firdale Village C. 6. a. i In the Firdale Village commercial area, development should include an attractive mix of uses that create a "neighborhood village" pedestrian -oriented environment. Commercial spaces shall be oriented toward the street in order to maximize visibility, and parking should be primarily accommodated either behind or underneath structures. C.6.a.ii Development shall not be more than four stories in height, and the design should focus on breaking up the mass and bulk of buildings by incorporating such features as setbacks, varying rooflines, and landscaping into the design of the site. The mix of uses should include not less than one quarter commercial space. Commercial Development Goal D. The Westgate Corridor is generally located between the 100"' Avenue W (9th Avenue S)/Edmonds Way intersection and where Edmonds Way turns north to enter the downtown area. By virtue of this location, this corridor serves as both a key transportation corridor and as an entry into the downtown. Long-established neighborhoods lie near both sides of the corridor. The plan for this corridor is to recognize its multiple functions by providing opportunities for small-scale businesses while promoting compatible development that will not intrude into established neighborhoods. D.1 Development within the Westgate Corridor should be designed to recognize its role as part of an entryway into Edmonds and the downtown. The overall effect should be a corridor that resembles a landscaped boulevard and median. The landscaped median along SR-104 should remain as uninterrupted as possible in order to promote traffic flow and provide an entry effect. D.2 Permit uses in planned business areas that are primarily intended to serve the local neighborhood while not contributing significantly to traffic congestion. D.3 Provide for transit and pedestrian access to development. DA Use design review to encourage the shared or joint use of driveways and access points by development onto SR-104 in order to support the movement of traffic in a safe and efficient manner. Site access shall not be provided from residential streets unless there is no feasible alternative. Land Use 71 D.5 Use design review to ensure that development provides a transition to adjacent residential neighborhoods. For uses in transitional areas adjacent to single family neighborhoods, use design techniques such as the modulation of facades, pitched roofs, stepped -down building heights, multiple buildings, and landscaping to provide designs compatible with single family development. Commercial Development Goal E. The Edmonds Way Corridor consists of portions of Edmonds Way between the 100th Avenue West intersection and Highway 99. This corridor serves as a key transportation corridor, and also provides a key link between Edmonds and Interstate 5. Established residential areas lie on both sides of the corridor. An established pattern of multiple family residential development lies along much of the corridor, while small-scale businesses can be found primarily near intersections. A major concern is that the more intensive development that occurs along the corridor should not interfere with the flow of through traffic or intrude into adjoining established communities. E.1 Permit uses in planned multiple family or small-scale business developments that are designed to minimize contributing significantly to traffic congestion. E.2 Provide for transit and pedestrian access to development. E.3 Use design review to encourage the shared or joint use of driveways and access points by development onto SR-104 in order to support the movement of traffic in a safe and efficient manner. Site access should not be provided from residential streets unless there is no feasible alternative. EA Use design review to ensure that development provides a transition to adjacent residential neighborhoods. For uses in transitional areas adjacent to single family neighborhoods, use design techniques such as the modulation of facades, pitched roofs, stepped -down building heights, multiple buildings, and landscaping to provide designs compatible with single family development. Make use of natural topography to buffer incompatible development whenever possible. Commercial Development Goal F. Sexually Oriented Businesses are regulated by specific licensing and operating provisions in the City Code. However, land use and zoning regulations are also required to mitigate and reduce the adverse secondary effects of these uses. These secondary effects are detailed in the findings adopted by Ordinance No. 3117 on October 15, 1996. As commercial uses, sexually oriented businesses should be limited to areas which can support the traffic and site requirements of these businesses while also assuring that their adverse secondary effects are mitigated. The following policies apply to sexually oriented businesses: F.1 Provide for potential commercial locations within the City for sexually oriented businesses which will provide at least a minimum separation and buffering necessary to protect public health and safety. F.2 Separate the location of sexually oriented businesses from uses that are incompatible with the secondary effects associated with sexually oriented businesses. These incompatible uses include residential uses and uses such as public parks, public libraries, museums, public or private schools, community centers, and religious facilities. They also include bars and taverns. 72 Land Use F.3 Adopt specific development regulations, such as lighting, parking and access provisions, that are designed to reduce or mitigate the secondary effects of sexually oriented businesses. FA Provide a mechanism to monitor, on an annual basis, the availability of potential sites for the location of sexually oriented businesses. Industrial Land Use General. Interestingly, industrial development played a major role in the early development of Edmonds. Sawmills, wharves, log ponds and other wood products industries lined the Edmonds waterfront at the turn of the twentieth century. However, as time passed, Edmonds developed into a very attractive residential community and its once thriving lumber industry faded into oblivion. Today, Edmonds still retains much of its residential, small town charm despite the large amount of urban development which has occurred in and around the City during the outward expansion of the Seattle metropolitan area during the past twenty-five years. Industrial development in the more traditional sense has not occurred in Edmonds to a significant degree since its early Milltown days. Most new industry which has located in the community since the 1950's has been largely of light manufacturing or service industry nature. Some examples include furniture manufacturing, printing and publishing, electronic components assembly and health care services. Future industrial development should be carefully controlled in order to insure that it is compatible with the residential character of Edmonds. Small scale, business -park oriented light industries and service related industries should be given preference over more intensive large scale industries. Great care should be given to carefully siting and designing all new industrial development in order to fully minimize or eliminate its adverse off -site impacts. Industrial Land Use Goal A. A select number of industrial areas should be located and developed which are reasonably attractive and contribute to the economic growth and stability of Edmonds without degrading its natural or residential living environment, in accordance with the following policies: A.1 Light industrial uses should be given preference over heavy industrial uses. A.2 The clustering of industrial uses in planned industrial parks should be required when the site is adequate. A.3 Adequate buffers of landscaping, compatible transitional land uses and open space should be utilized to protect surrounding land areas from the adverse effects of industrial land use. Particular attention should be given to protecting residential areas, parks and other public -institutional land uses. A.4 All industrial areas should be located where direct access can be provided to regional ground transportation systems (major State Highways and/or railroad lines). Land Use 73 Open Space General. Open space is important in defining the character of the Edmonds area and should be preserved and enhanced for enjoyment by current and future generations. Open space provides many benefits for people and natural systems. Open Space Goal A. Open space must be seen as an essential element determining the character and quality of the Edmonds environment, in accordance with the following policies. A.1 Undeveloped public property should be studied to determine its suitability and appropriate areas designed as open space. A. La No city -owned property should be relinquished until all possible community uses have been explored. A.2. All feasible means should be used to preserve the following open spaces: A.2.a Lands which have unique scientific or educational value. A.2.b Areas which have an abundance of wildlife, particularly where there are habitats of rare or endangered species. A.2.c Natural and green belt areas adjacent to highways and arterials with the priority to highways classified as scenic. A.2.d Areas which have steep slopes or are in major stream drainage ways, particularly those areas which have significance to Edmonds residents as water sheds or natural drainage ways. A.2.e Land which can serve as buffers between residential and commercial or industrial development. A.2.f Bogs and wetlands. A.2.g Land which can serve as buffers between high noise environments and adjacent uses. A.2.h Lands which would have unique suitability for future passive or active recreational use. A.2.i Areas which would have unique rare or endangered types of vegetation. - A.3 Open space should be distributed throughout the urban areas in such a manner that there is both visual relief and variety in the pattern of development and that there is sufficient space for active and passive recreation. Provide views and open space in areas of high density housing by requiring adequate setback space and separation between structures. Open Space Goal B. Edmonds possesses a most unique and valuable quality in its location on Puget Sound. The natural supply of prime recreational open space, particularly beaches and waterfront areas, must be accessible to the public, in accordance with the following policies: B.1 Edmonds saltwater shorelines and other waterfront areas should receive special consideration in all future acquisition and preservation programs. 74 Land Use B.2 Wherever possible, provide public access to public bodies of water. Soils and Topography General. The natural topography of the city contributes to the environmental character of the community. Many of the remaining undeveloped areas of the city are located on hillsides or in ravines where steep slopes have discouraged development. These can often be areas where natural drainage ways and stands of trees or habitat exist. In some areas, soil conditions also exist which are severely limited for certain kinds of development. Based on soil, slope, and geological analysis for the city, areas may be identified as potentially hazardous for specific types of development. Some areas which are limited for intensive development may be desirable for public recreation, open spaces, conservation of existing natural features, maintenance of valuable biological communities, and protection of natural storm drainage systems. In some hillside areas, changes in existing soil characteristics because of development, grading, increased runoff and removal of vegetation may cause severe erosion, water pollution and flooding with subsequent damage to public and private property. Soils and Topography Goal A. Future development in areas of steep slope and potentially hazardous soil conditions should be based on site development which preserves the natural site characteristics in accordance with the following policies: A.1 Large lots or flexible subdivision procedures, such as PRD's, should be used in these areas to preserve the site and reduce impervious surfaces, cuts and fills. A.2 Streets and access ways should be designed to conform to the natural topography, reduce runoff and minimize grading of hillsides. Soils and Topography Goal B. Development on steep slopes or hazardous soil conditions should preserve the natural features of the site, in accordance with the following policies: B.1 Grading and Filling. B. La Grading, filling, and tree cutting shall be restricted to building pads, driveways, access ways and other impervious surfaces. B. L b Grading shall not jeopardize the stability of any slope, or of an adjacent property. B. L c Only minimal amounts of cut and fill on hillsides exceeding 15% slope should be permitted so that the natural topography can be preserved. Fill shall not be used to create a yard on steeply sloped property. B. L d Fill and excavated dirt shall not be pushed down the slope. B.2. Building Construction. B.2.a Buildings on slopes of 15% or greater shall be designed to cause minimum disruption to the natural topography. Land Use 75 B.2. b Retaining walls are discouraged on steep slopes. If they are used they should be small and should not support construction of improvements which do not conform to the topography. B.2. c Water detention devices shall be used to maintain the velocity of runoff at predevelopment levels. B.3. Erosion Control. B.3.a Temporary measures shall betaken to reduce erosion during construction. B.3. b Natural vegetation should be preserved wherever possible to reduce erosion and stabilize slopes, particularly on the downhill property line. B.3.c Slopes should be stabilized with deep rooted vegetation and mulch, or other materials to prevent erosion and siltation of drainage ways. Vegetation and Wildlife General. As Edmonds has urbanized, the native vegetation has become increasingly scarce. The city's woodlands, marshes and other areas containing natural vegetation provide an important resource which should be preserved. Woodlands help stabilize soils on steep slopes, and act as barriers to wind and sound. Natural vegetation provides habitat for wildlife. Plants replenish the soil with nutrients. They generate oxygen and clean pollutants from the air. The beauty of the natural growth provides pleasing vistas and helps to buffer one development from another. Areas where natural vegetation exists provide good sites for nature trails and for other recreational and educational opportunities. Wildlife is a valuable natural resource that greatly enhances the quality of human life. City beaches, breakwaters and pilings represent unique habitats for marine organisms. Streams, lakes and saltwater areas offer habitats for many species of migrating and resident bird life. Wooded areas and city parks provide habitats for many birds and mammals. Many birds and mammals are dependent upon both the upland and beach areas. Vegetation and Wildlife Goal A. The city should ensure that its woodlands, marshes and other areas containing natural vegetation are preserved, in accordance with the following policies: A. l Critical areas will be designated and protected using the best available science (BAS). A.2 The removal of trees should be minimized, particularly when they are located on steep slopes or hazardous soils. Subdivision layouts, buildings and roads should be designed so that existing trees are preserved. A.3 Trees that are diseased, damaged, or unstable should be removed. 76 Land Use A.4 Grading should be restricted to building pads and roads only. Vegetation outside these areas should be preserved. Vegetation and Wildlife Goal B. The city should promote and increase public awareness and pride in its wildlife heritage. Special emphasis should be directed toward preserving the natural habitats (woodlands, marshes, streams and beaches) of the city's wildlife in accordance with the following policies: B.1 Establish and maintain a variety of educational and recreational programs and activities for all age levels. B.2 Erect and maintain educational displays that identify some of the more common plants and animals and the ecology of major habitats, (e.g., sand, rock, piling and deepwater). B.3 Prevent the unnecessary disturbance of native species and organisms from beach and near -shore environments. BA Encourage landscaping and site improvement on city -owned property which recognizes value of habitat in overall site design. Air Pollution General. Air pollution is primarily a regional problem related to urbanization and meteorological conditions in the Puget Sound Basin. It is the result of activities in which most citizens participate. Air pollution can cause severe health effects and property damage under certain conditions. Air Pollution Goal A. Clean air is a right to all citizens of the City of Edmonds and should be protected and maintained in accordance with the following policies: A.1 Discourage expansion of arterials which will substantially increase line sources of pollution. A.2 Encourage arrangement of activities which will generate the fewest necessary automobile trip miles while avoiding undue concentration of like uses. A.3 Support, through political action, strong enforcement policies and ordinances in the regional pollution control agency. A.4 Support, by political action and financial participation, the establishment of public transportation in the community as an alternative to dependence on individual vehicles. A.5 Encourage programs supporting commute trip reduction. Land Use 77 Noise Pollution General. Although no area of human activity is free of sound, the modern urban environment is increasingly suffering from an overload of sound in the form of noise. The effects of noise may be severe. The most obvious effect is loss of hearing where levels of noise are very high and sustained. A less documented effect is general environmental stress from the physiological and psychological impacts of noise. Noise problems can come from general background sources, such as vehicular noise,or periodic point source problems, such as airplanes, electronically amplified music, sirens, etc. Certain noise problems can be alleviated more easily than others. The noise of vehicular traffic, particularly on arterial streets is difficult to control. Point sources can be more easily regulated by requiring noise muffling equipment. Enforcement of noise standards can be a problem because of the training and skill involved in taking noise measurements. Cost of enforcement may be excessive if standards are too stringent. Noise Pollution Goal A. Preserve the quiet residential environment of the city by limiting increases in noise and reducing unnecessary noise where it now exists in accordance with the following policies: A.1 The city should partner with other jurisdictions in seeking to enforce appropriate noise standards within the city. A.2 Any ordinances adopted by the city should recognize the variety and quality of noise environments. A.3 It is the policy of the city to minimize noise created by the railroad. Urban Growth Areas General. The accompanying Urban Growth Areas map shows the City's urban growth area, which encompasses unincorporated areas adjacent to the current city limits. In general, development within the urban growth area is of interest to the City because the area will be annexed to the City in the future and development in the area can be expected to have an impact on the demand for and delivery of City services. Urban Growth Area Goal A. Plan for the logical extension of services and development within the City's urban growth area. A.1 Encourage the annexation of the City's designated urban growth area into the city. A.2 To provide for orderly transitions, adopt comparable zoning and comprehensive plan designations for areas annexing into the City. A.3 Adopted plans and policies for the urban growth area shall be consistent and compatible with the general comprehensive plan goals and policies for the City. 78 Land Use Land Capacity Background The Growth Mangement Act (GMA) provides the framework for planning at all levels in Washington State. Under the mandate of the GMA (RCW 36.70A.215,), local Rovernements are required to evaluate the density and capacity for Urban Growth Areas (UGAs). Edmonds has been allocated population, housing, and employment growth targets through County Planning Policies. Population projections are based on the official 20-year population projections for Snohomish County from the Office of Financial Management and distributed as represented in Puget Sound Regional Council's Vision 2040 Regional Growth Strategy. Edmonds is considered a Larger City for regional strategy pMoses. The Larger�City designation is applied to cities that have a combined population and employment total over 22,500. Currently, eighteen cities are grouped in the Larger City designation. As a group, these cities are expected to accommodate 14% of the re . ig on's projected population growth and 12% of the regional projected employment growth. The 2035 population target for Edmonds is 45,550 persons, up 14.4% from the 2011 population estimate of 39,800. To accommodate the targeted growth, Edmonds will require approximately 2,772 new housing units and 2,313 new jobs by 2035. The c4- was ..o,,uire,1 to estimate the abilit-y of land within the City of Edmonds to aeeefilmeda4e t 40H an Plan was adopted in 1995. City of Edmonds Land Supply 1994 (Gross A sl TWO Developed ;4eaff)f Land se Aek Areas Aefe3 Re ;,10,,� Multi Famil 202.9 193.5 Business Gimer-e iai 296.9 284.7 Y �i Im"Stfia1 -s" � 4" pis 3-54 3-5-..3 — Schools 4-3-" 4-3-" — 46 Land Use n..vs Q. Open e, aee- 349.2 349.2 - U 2" 2" - meets 867.9 867.9 - T-et=a4,743.3 4,540.9 232.4 Table 4-5 summarizes available GIS data on land supply in Edmonds as it existed in 49942014. Developed acres include the entire parcel boundaries that contained development, not just the building footprint. The Edmonds Marsh accounted for all vacant acres listed under Parks & Open Space rat on osidei#ia ,-ad eewAner-eial development i 1994 e shown i f Table 6 Table 4 City of Edmonds Land Supply (Gross Acres), 2014 Land Use Total Acres Developed Lands Acres % of Total Acres Vacant Lands Acres % of Total Acres Residential Single -Family 3428.9 3272.3 56.9% 156.6 2.7% Multi -Family 203.9 181.0 3.1% 22.9 0.4% Retirement/Special Needs 16.9 16.9 0.3% Business Commercial 209.7 209.7 3.6% Industrial 32.2 32.2 0.6% Medical 40.8 40.8 0.7% Mixed Use 62.8 39.3 0.7% 23.5 0.4% Public Facilities Government 14.0 14.0 0.2% Schools 171.5 171.5 3.0% Parks & Open Space 416.7 393.3 6.8% 23.4 0.4% Religious 41.6 41.6 0.7% Streets/Parking/Driveways 1093.9 1093.9 19.0% Utilities 13.8 13.8 0.2% Total 1 5746.7 5520.3 96.1% 1 226.4 3.9% Source: City of Edmonds GIS data, Nov-2014 Overall, ap-p - v:matel , nearly 95-4%pereeit of the City's lande-ity was vacantdevelepe in 49-942014. Approximately -779.3%pereerft of the �� „aevelepe vacant lands -(ap m.,44y� 226.4 acres) were designated for residential uses: 71per69.2% for single-family residences and 4per-e10.1% for multi -family residences. Of the remaining vacant lands, 25 pef 10.4% of Land Use 47 undeveloped l „a w ^swas designated for ^ ^ ^' and in"stfial usesmixed use and 10.3% represented the Edmonds Marsh. For a more in-depth study, the 2012 Buildable Lands Report BLR, developed Gapaeity-build-out ca aci estimates deve ,,p for vacant and under -developed parcels. Using_a process developed by Snohomish County Tomorrow, the BLR was prepared in 2012 and adopted by the Snohomish County Council in June 2013. This report provided the city with the necesSM information to complete a development capacity analysis.Tr �' ^^^„+'^ra r^'• a^a^r^^'� +''^+ euffefftly have no stmetffes; r-esidet#ial pafeels were eensider-ed under- developed if they eofftaine less tha-m 50 per-eent of the allowable density under- existing zoning (for- &iafflple, a single famil house on a five aer-e pafeel that is zoned fef fiatif tmits pef aefe). The analysis fneastffed the build otA eapaeity of vaeaf4 and under- developed par -eels, M-Mmi-m. Table 6 Development and Capacity VTVacant Land TTJT Existing evelo p men V c-ant'Develo pment Capacit�i Residential Gemmorninl Rocidential Gernmornial �crcrr crr r-c���c.TZiur crr Unots t%OY RtE)WR 1� Square ,206 � � 4-7 Square 50 6,996 Senter Highway . 9 � 558,912 4-9 187,930 d 76th and 1 QF+h -5 5 -3- RdS 6 4 /, � tly i�cS 8 �9 7-3 RS 12 2-,74-9 224 RC\, cvv 12 54 — RS 29 -3&2 64 Total 3 2,660, 7�� �21,351,333 � -r-.rr r SouFGe. City of c,f.,,, nds Planning Depa - me t loan 48 Land Use Table 5: Summary of Buildable Lands Report Additional Additional Housing Unit Additional Housing Unit Additional Population Employment Capacity (before reductions) Capacity (after reductions) Capacity (after reductions) Capacity (after reductions) SF I MF Sr. Apts Total SF MF Sr. Apts Total SF MF Sr. Apts Total Buildable Lands Report 561 2,381 482 3,424 444 1,868 334 2,646 1,236 3,437 393 5,065 2,820 Source: Buildable Lands Report, 2012 Given the limited supply of vacant land within the city, capacity estimates were not calculated strictly on the amount of vacant buildable land, but also on increased densities and intensity of redevelopment within various areas of the city. Two Different methods of development were targeted to provide additional residential capacity,-.- For example, accessory dwelling units (ADUs) were one method of attemotiniz to suoolement capacity in single familv neighborhoods. while encourauiniz mixed use development in commercial areas provided for additional capacity in areas already experiencing a higher level of activity. Planned Residential Developments (PRDs) were also targeted as a way of assuring maximum buildout of single -family -zoned areas while bnaintainine the character of the ci . Al Following adoption of the 1995 comprehensive plan, the city embarked on an implementation program to achieve the goals identified in the plan. Many of these implementation measures are described in the Housing Element under the discussion of "reasonable measur-e strate ieg s to promote affordable housing." These measures were taken by the city to address issues related to both capacity and affordable housing. A key feature of Edmonds' ceomprehensive plan is its emphasis on mixed use development, which includes both commercial and residential uses on a single lot or combination of lots. For example, a mixed use development could include a two-story development with residential dwelling units on the second floor and offices, shops or other commercial uses on the ground floor, or it could consist of a mixture of uses arranged in proximity to each other. Edmonds is unique in relying to a signif4eant degree on mi*ed iise develepmei4 as a land tise pattem designed to address petepAial eapaeit-y. Mixed use development is allowed in both of the city's Activity Centers; and in the Corridor development areas. In the 1995 comprehensive plan, mixed use development was to be allowed under all the alternatives considered, but would only be encouraged under the adopted "Designed Infill" alternative. The encouragement of mixed use development continues as a basic assumption underlying the current comprehensive plan. This basic approach is embodied in much of the development that has occurred in recent years. The importance of mixed use in the city's land use pattern can be seen in Figure 9-7. Land Use 49 Figure 9: General Use Categories by % of City Land Area Singli Res 22 Singe Family Urban j9.7496 Source: City of Edmonds GIS, Nov-]4 Multi Family Mixed use 5.89% Crammer€ial //f O Medical 0.32% Parks 5.27% Open Spaoe 0.93% J-111#les 0.24 50 Land Use Figure 8 General Use Categories by % of City Land Area Open Space Master Plan 5.0% Piihlir leighborhood Commerc 0.4% Ilan ned-Neighborhood 0.2% lowntown Districts 1.2% ;ommunity Commercial 0.4% Edmonds Way Corridor 0.6% Mixed Use Commercial 2.4% Corridor Development 3.6% Single �. 40.5% ��.. Single Family Resource 21.1% E w--Population and Employment Capacity WIN 877 -pea le wa 1,887 a The 2012 Buildable Lands Report (BLR) showed an Edmonds housing capacity of an additional 2,646 units through the year 2035, which would accommodate a total population of 45,550 residents. Since the BLR was finalized in 2012, some of the assumptions reizarding buildable lands have changed. During the 2015 Comprehensive Plan update, city st considered how these changes affected capacity_ projections. For example, recent plans by the City to encourage mixed -use development in the Neighborhood Business areas of Westeate and Five Corners. ulus the removal of restrictions on first and second floor residential development in CG and CG2 zones alongthe he Highway 99 corridor, should provide the city with buildable lands capacity not considered in the 2012 BLR. In total, the City conservatively estimates these actions can increase the buildable lands capacitybgpproximatel, 850 net housingunits nits applying the same methodology used in the Buildable Lands Report. With these adjustments, the City estimates a total capacity of 2,810 additional housing units by the year 2035. The projected need to accommodate the targeted population growth was 2,772 housing Land Use 51 units as determined by the Countywide Planning Policies. The land capacity analysis, combined with the goals and policies in the comprehensive plan, indicate that the 2035 targets for population and employment can be accommodated by the City. HoweNef, the jobs eapaeity does not take k4o aeeoimit any new .lemert io .,etiors pr-oposed i the Hig4. ay 90 OMPR ON 11111111ffl ■ .. . • Mill- _ � NOW empleyment for-eeasts for- the next 20 yeafs within the Urban GfevA Area. Snohomish Gotmty a-m-d its cities have worked together with the Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRG) to arrive at foreeasts tha� eaeh eity will use to aeeoffffnodate its fair- share of r-egiefial gr-owth. The City of Edmonds' share-- > > 079 residential . A eemparisen summm of additional ..,,..,,l4ior eapae tyhistorical rowth and the -2 2035 population and housing targets is presented in Figure 109 and Table 66. The eity is able to es:aor- a p nnifig tar -get within (Shown as the "hi " vs. "low" gfevi4h lines in Figtffe 9). Based on histo6eal trends, the "low" taf- appears to be the most reasonable for- Edmonds particularly in light of the felatively high !an values in the eity. The !a -ad eapaeity analysis, eambined with the goals and pokeies in th-e comprehensive plan, indicates that both the projected targets for population and employment ean be The adopted 2035 employment target for Edmonds is 14,148, which represents an increase of 2,313 above the 11,835 people employed in the City in 2011. The 2012 Buildable Lands analysis showed a 52 Land Use potential increased capacity of 2,820 employees by 2035, which has been increased to 3,522 using the same analysisployed in reviewing the housing and population capacity discussed above. The City should consider using incentives to achieve redevelopment and infill goals and zoning incentives or other measures to ensure that land adjacent to infrastructure facilities is utilized to maximize the economic and environmental benefits of that infrastructure. Given the extent to which future land use policies, regulations, demographics and market forces could affect land capacity estimates, however, it is important that development trends and remaining land supply within the city is regularly monitored in order to ensure the continued supply of adequate urban land throughout the 20-year GMA planning horizon. Implementation strategies should include development of a long-term program to monitor the city's progress towards goals contained in the Comprehensive Plan. As part of the monitoring process, the city should work with the public, environmental and business leaders, interest groups, cities and other agencies to develop detailed monitoring criteria or "benchmarks" that could be used to measure progress and identify the need for corrective action. Specific implementation measures should seek to reduce barriers or impediments to development. For example, measures that reduce the regulatory compliance burden of the private sector, if successful, would reduce the cost imposed by such regulations. Similarly, implementation measures that are designed to encourage flexibility could also help reduce compliance costs — at least on a case - by -case basis. Specific measures could include: provision of flexible development standards; density bonuses for site designs that provide public benefits; and fee waivers or expedited review that lower financial development risks - Land Use 53 Figure 10: Edmonds Growth Targets vs. HistoriCal Growth 60 s O F 40 sS 8q ru YL 25 20 16 M S 1940 1%0 1966 1970 1590 1W Q¢ 2010 2D2V MS, 2pp$' MPopulatiM +CrcwthTarget ScYfC6. Census. 20f0. &uiidatdeLands RePcw. 2012 Figure 9 Edmonds Growth Targets vs. Historical Growth 50,000 Buildable Lands Capacity (45,207) 45,000 40,000 r 35,000 C p 30,000 25,000 Q a 20,000 15,000 10,000 5,000 0 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010` 2020` 2025` � Buildable Lands Capacity 0 Low Growth Target 0 Historical Growth 4 High Growth Target 54 Land Use Table 6 City of Edmonds Existing and Projected Growth 2000 2010 2035 (Plan Target) Population 39,515 39,709 45,550 Nominal Change 8,771 194 5,841 % Change 28.50% 0.49% 14.71% Annual % Change 2.50% 0.05% 0.55% Housing Units 17,508 18,378 21,168 Nominal Change 4,563 870 2,790 % Change 35.20% 4.97% 15.18% Avg HH Size 2.32 2.26 2.2 Avg Persons/Unit 2.26 2.16 2.15 .Gross Density 1 3.1 3.16 3.64 Source: Census 2010, Buildable Lands Report 2012 Land Use 55 49N 2888 2025 (Plan Target) 30,744 339,515 44,990 3� Q c 4-� -2-� 475% 12,945 47,598 20,5g7 ''� 4,--%3 �9 2 1.0-07; 35.2 -07 � 1% 24-8 34 36 Dengity-� 4-9 5:4 64 1 1 Gross Density = number of households per gross acre of land, city-wide. Note that this includes non-residential land, so the density per gross residential acre is significantly higher. way af e dedueted. Note that this is ineltides non residential !and, so the density per- Bet residential aefe is signifieantly higher, Source! U.S. Census, 2000, and Edmonds Planning Division, 2004. 56 Land Use Activity Centers Introduction. The VISION2040 regional plan establishes a growth management, transportation, environmental, and economic strategy for the Puget Sound region of turban growth areas UGAs framed by open space and linked by efficient, high capacity transit. While the hilt l=y an ehar-aeter- of development in Edmonds does not suppeA its designa4ion as one of these r-eg�&� eenter-sTthe concepts developed in VISION 2020 2040 are supported in the Edmonds Comprehensive Plan. The approach proposed in Edmonds is to strategically plan for future development in two activity centers located within the community. basedan the "Activ i-y Glusdescribed in VISION 2020: Activity Centers in Edmonds are intended to address the following framework goals: A-.-ooPedestrian-oriented -.Provide a pedestrian -oriented streetscape environment for residential and commercial activity. &ooMixed-use - Encourage mixed -use development patterns that provide a variety of commercial and residential opportunities, including both multi -family and small -lot single family development. G.00Community character - Build on historical character and natural relationships, such as historic buildings, slopes with views, and the waterfront. D,00Multimodal -Encourage transit service and access. E-.00Balanced (re)development - Strategically plan for development and redevelopment that achieves a balanced and coordinated approach to economic development, housing, and cultural goals. Roo Concurrence -Coordinate the plans and actions of both the public and private sectors. CooUrban design - Provide a context for urban design guidelines that maximize predictability while assuring a consistent and coherent character of development. Land Use 57 oo Adaptive reuse - Provide incentives to encourage adaptive reuse as an alternative to redevelopment of historic structures in order to preserve these resources. 58 Land Use Land Use 59 Downtown/ -Waterfront Activity Center Plan Context. A number of public plans and projects have been taking shape in recent years, and these will have a profound impact on the future of the city's downtown/ -waterfront area. Some of these ongoing activities include: oo Increased concern about conflicts and safety issues related to the interaction of rail, ferry, vehicular and pedestrian traffic. oo Transportation planning and the Edmonds Crossing multimodal project which will move the existing ferry terminal at the base of Main Street to a new multimodal transportation center at Pt. Edwards. oo Continued development of the city's waterfront parks and walkways into an interconnected necklace of public spaces. oo The South County Senior Center is undertaking strategic planning to look at its facilities, programs, and services. oo Public access to the water and the natural beauty of the waterfront figures prominently in the Port of Edmonds' plans, including new plazas, improved walkways and public art. Public pedestrian/bicycle access across the railroad tracks to the waterfront, in the vicinity of the south end of the marina, near Marina Beach Park, should remain a high priority. oo Arts plans continue to be implemented throughout the downtown, including such projects as the Edmonds Center for the Arts, the Artworks facility, and the continued expansion of downtown festivals and events. oo Edmonds Community College has expanded its downtown presence through initiatives with the Edmonds Conference Center (formerly Edmonds Floral Conference Center) and is working with the Edmonds Center for the Arts to enhance overall operations. 9—.Downtown/Waterfront Vision. Taken together, the goals and policies for the Downtown/ Waterfront Activity Center present a vision for Edmonds downtown/ -waterfront. By actively pursuing the ferry terminal's relocation, the City has set upon an ambitious and exciting course. It is a course that holds promise for the downtown/ -waterfront, but it is one that will require concerted action by the entire community, including local, state and federal public officials, business groups and citizens. While the challenges presented in this effort are substantial, the possible rewards are even greater, for with its existing physical assets, future opportunities and the energy of its citizens, Edmonds has the potential to create one of the region's most attractive and vital city centers. Components of the overall vision for the downtown/ -waterfront area include: oo The Edmonds Crossing multimodal transportation center provides convenient transportation connections for bus, ferry, rail, auto and bicycle riders and makes Edmonds an integrated node in the regional transportation system. The new terminal reduces negative impacts to downtown Edmonds while still providing a link between the 60 Land Use terminal and downtown Edmonds. The project provides the community with varied transportation resources and an economic stimulus to the larger community. 0o Downtown is extended westward and connected to the shoreline by positive mixed -use development as well as by convenient pedestrian routes. Redevelopment of the holding lanes and SR-104 is pursued after the ferry terminal relocates to Point Edwards. 0o The shoreline features a full spectrum of recreational activities, park settings, marina facilities, and supporting uses. 00 There is a more efficient transportation system featuring commuter and passenger trains, increased bus service, pedestrian and bicycle routes, and adequate streets and parking areas. Transportation conflicts and safety issues involving the interaction of rail, ferry, vehicular and pedestrian traffic are resolved. 0o There is a more active and vital setting for new retail, office, entertainment and associated businesses supported by both nearby residents and the larger Edmonds community, and that attracts visitors from throughout the region. 0o The downtown supports a mix of uses, including traditional commercial and multi family development with new mixed -use development types. Single family neighborhoods are a part of this mix of uses, and contribute to the choice of housing and character of downtown. 0o Opportunities for new development and redevelopment reinforce Edmonds' attractive, small town pedestrian -oriented character. Pedestrian -scale building height limits are an important part of this quality of life, and remain in effect. 0o Provide incentives to encourage adaptive reuse as an alternative to redevelopment of historic structures in order to preserve these resources. 0o Auto traffic is rerouted to minimize impact to residential neighborhoods. Downtown/Waterfront Goals and Plan Policies. The following goals and policies are intended to achieve the framework ,goals for the downtown/waterfront area: C. Cow` t&for4he-Downtown/-Waterfront Area Goal A. To achieve this vision,oals for the Promote downtown Edmonds as a setting for retail, office, entertainment and associated businesses supported by nearby residents and the larger Edmonds community, and as a destination for visitors from throughout the region. A.1 Ensure that the downtown/waterfront area continues — and builds on — its function as a key identity element for the Edmonds community. Land Use 61 A.2 Enhance Edmonds' visual identity y continuing its pedestrian -scale of downtown development, enhancing its shoreline character, and protecting and building on the strong visual quality of the "5th and Main" core. A.3 Encourage a more active and vital setting for new retail, office, entertainment and associated businesses supported by nearby residents and the larger Edmonds community, downtown commercial activity and visitors from throughout the region. AA Enhance shoreline features to include a full spectrum of recreational activities, park settings, natural features (such as the Edmonds Marsh), and marina facilities. Improve public access to the shoreline and link waterfront features bX establishing a continuous esplanade along the shoreline. The esplanade will be constructed over time through public improvements and Shoreline Master Program requirements placed on private development. A.5 Support the development and retention of significant public investments in the downtown/waterfront area, including government and cultural facilities that help draw residents and visitors to downtown. 90 A.6 Provide greater residential opportunities and personal services within the downtown, especially to accommodate the needs of a changing population. Downtown/Waterfront Area Goal B. Continue to plan for and implement improvements in the downtown/waterfront area that resolve safety conflicts while encouraging multi -modal transportation and access to the waterfront. B.1. Future development along the waterfront should support the continuation and compatible design of three regional facilities: Edmonds Crossing at Pt. Edwards: the Port of Edmonds and its master plan: and the regional parks, beaches and walkways making up the public shoreline. B.2. Plan for improvements to resolve transportation and safety conflicts in the downtown/waterfront area. B.63- Provide a more efficient transportation system featuring improved bus service, edestrian and bicycle routes, and adequate streets and parking areas. Downtown/Waterfront Area Goal BC. Continue to plan for and implement the Edmonds Crossing multimodal transportation center at Pt. Edwards — pursuing the design, permitting, land acquisition and development of the project. The completion of Edmonds Crossing will help address the competing needs of three regional facilities (transportation, parks and open space — including the Edmonds Marsh, and the Port of Edmonds) while providing opportunities for redevelopment and linkage between downtown Edmonds and its waterfront. . 62 Land Use B4C.1 Utilize the Point Edwards site to its best community and regional potential by developing a multimodal transit center with compatible development in the surrounding area. In addition to the regional benefits arising from its multi modal transportation function, an essential community benefit is in removing intrusive ferry traffic from the core area which serves to visually and physically separate downtown from the waterfront. B73-.C.2. Establish a Point Edwards multimodal transportation center which provides convenient transportation connections for bus, ferry, rail, auto, pedestrians and bicycle riders and makes Edmonds an integrated node in the regional transportation system. The new terminal should be planned to reduce negative impacts to downtown Edmonds — such as ar�paration/safety concerns and conflicts with other regional facilities — while providing the community unique transportation resources and an economic stimulus to the larger community. B-.4.C.3. Extend Downtown westward and connect it to the shoreline encouraging mixed -use development and pedestrian -oriented amenities and streetscape improvements, particularly along Dayton and Main Streets. Development in this area should draw on historical design elements found in the historic center of Edmonds to ensure an architectural tie throughout the Downtown Area. Pursue redevelopment of SR-104 and the existingholding olding lanes once the ferry terminal moves to Point Edwards. B -. -5,C.4. Improve traffic conditions by removing ferry traffic impacts from the downtown core. . ai .. Li "a ,.a,.,...,.4,. ,.#, 0'- ,..,a Downtown/Waterfront Area Goal A Define the downtown commercial and retail core along streets having the strongest pedestrian links and pedestrian -oriented design elements, while protecting downtown's identity. D.1 Encourage opportunities for new development and redevelopment which reinforce Edmonds' attractive, small town pedestrian oriented character. Provide incentives to encourage adaptive reuse as an alternative to redevelopment of historic structures in order to preserve these resources. These historic structures are a key component of the small town character of Edmonds and it's economic viability. Height limits that reinforce and require pedestrian -scale development are an important part of this quality of life, and should be implemented through zoning regulations and design guidelines. D.2 Provide for the gradual elimination of large and inadequately landscaped paved areas. D.3 Provide pedestrian -oriented amenities for citizens and visitors throughout the downtown/waterfront area, including such things as: • Weather protection, Land Use 63 • Street trees and flower baskets, • Street furniture, • Public art and art integrated into private developments, • Pocket parks, • Sig_nage and other way -finding devices, Restrooms. DA Strive for the elimination of overhead wires and poles whenever possible. D.5 Coordinate new building design with old structure restoration and renovation. D.6 Develop sign i regulations that support the pedestrian character of downtown, encouraging signage to assist in locating businesses and public and cultural facilities while discouraging obtrusive and garish signage which detracts from downtown pedestrian and cultural amenities. D.7 Provide lighting for streets and public areas that is designed to promote comfort, security, and aesthetic beautL. 90 D.8 Building design should discourage automobile access and curb cuts that interfere with pedestrian activity and break up the streetscape. Encourage the use of alley entrances and courtyards to beautify the back alleys in the commercial and mixed use areas in the downtown area. Downtown/Waterfront Area Goal E. Identify supporting arts and mixed use residential and office areas which support and complement downtown retail use areas. Provide for a strong central retail core at downtown's focal center while providing for a mixture of supporting commercial and residential uses in the area surrounding this retail core area. Emphasize and plan for links between the retail core and these supporting areas. 90 E.1 Support a mix of uses downtown which includes a variety of housing, commercial, and cultural activities. ao Downtown/Waterfront Area Goal F. Focus development between the commercial and retail core and the Edmonds Center for the Arts on small-scale retail, service, and multi -family residential uses. 90 Downtown/Waterfront Area Goal G. Develop gateway/entrance areas into downtown which serve complementary purposes (e.g. convenience shopping, community activities). Downtown/Waterfront Area Goal H. Explore alternative development opportunities in the waterfront area, such as specifically encouraging arts -related and arts -complementing uses. 64 Land Use H.1 Improve and encourage economic development opportunities by providingspace pace for local businesses and cottage industries and undertaking supportingpublic improvement projects. Of particular significance is the enhancement of economic development opportunities resulting from the Edmonds Crossing project and the enhancement of Edmonds as an arts and water -oriented destination. Multi -modal D—.Transportation. Primary goals of the City's Downtown Waterfront Plan include integrating the downtown core with the waterfront, improving pedestrian access and traffic circulation, and encouraging mixed -use development. Current conditions limit the city's ability to achieve these plan goals by making it difficult to move between the two areas, thereby minimizing the value of the shoreline as a public resource and amenity while adversely affecting the potential for redevelopment. A number of studies and public involvement projects have been completed to determine how to meet the variety of transportation needs that converge within Downtown Edmonds. Following an initial 1992 Ferry Relocation Feasibility Study and a visioning focus group convened by Edmonds' Mayor in April 1992, the importance of the conflicting transportation needs culminated in the City of Edmonds, Washington State Ferries, and Community Transit signing a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) in November 1993. The MOU called for the cooperative development of solutions to the conflicts between the City's growth plans and ferry traffic in particular. In response to that agreement, preliminary engineering and environmental analysis of alternatives began in late 1993. hi 1994, the Edmonds City Council held public hearings on the possibility of relocating the existing ferry terminal and incorporating a new terminal within a larger multimodal project. As a result of the hearings, the Council expressed support for a regional multimodal facility. The Council also approved the 1994 Edmonds Downtown Waterfront Plan which specifically supported the facility's location at Pt. Edwards. Further environmental review and facility definition resulted in a recommendation that an alternative site (other than the existing Main Street location) should be developed as a multimodal facility serving ferry, rail, bus, pedestrian, and bicycle travel needs. Several alternative sites for the relocated ferry terminal and the proposed multimodal center were evaluated as part of the early environmental screening process. During this screening process, federal, state, regional, and local regulatory agencies —including affected Tribes— provided input regarding issues that could impact selecting reasonable alternatives. Based on this extensive screening process, two alternatives were recommended for further analysis in the Environmental Impact Statement process. A Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) was issued on February 25, 1998, and the Final EIS was issued on November 10, 2004. Pt. Edwards is the preferred alternative for a multimodal terminal site. In addition to the transportation benefits of moving the existing ferry terminal, a number of redevelopment opportunities will result within the downtown waterfront area. These range from park and public access improvements to opportunities for significant redevelopment and connections between the waterfront and downtown. Land Use 65 P U E r S0tjm0 CcmroEo (Part bti [Part ar f�hlln9 W.W ke"'4 fGFIV LOW'�re Park (South ChM �� 4 'W-i'41fBfiatkhlYtLondrnp 7arh{Ha") sv�n PWk C E4a+e Pr�lt Figure 110. Integration of the remaining ferry pier structure into surrounding parks will be a key public benefit and opportunity. 66 Land Use Edmonds Crossing. Edmonds Crossing is a multimodal transportation center proposed to be constructed at Point Edwards, the former UNOCAL oil storage facility south of the Edmonds Marina. This multimodal transportation center will provide the capacity to respond to growth while providing improved opportunities for connecting various forms of travel, including rail, ferry, bus, bicycle, walking and ridesharing. The project is supported by local, regional, and state plans, including the Puget Sound Regional Council's Destination 2030 Metropolitan Transportation and VISION -2 2040 plan; Washington State Ferries' (WSF) System Plan for 1999-2018; Snohomish County's countywide Transportation Plan; the City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan; and the Port of Edmonds Strategic Plan and Master Plan. Edmonds Crossing will provide: oo Intersection improvements at Pine Street and SR-104; oo Interconnection of Amtrak service to Chicago and Vancouver, B.C., Sounder commuter rail service between Everett and Seattle, and other regional transportation modes; oo Connections to the regional transit system with direct bus service to communities throughout the urban growth area; oo Enhanced ability for people to rideshare, bicycle and walk to connect with travel opportunities at the multimodal center; oo Improved safety and travel on Edmonds local streets and along SR-104 between the ferry terminal and 1-5. oo Linkage between Navy facilities at Everett and on the Kitsap peninsula. Land Use 67 GO Figure 121. 240 KM19pnPr`. a5�i �� � tigJ i .V • ea w X. I tad of b� +�eruv, UNOCAL P4tr i k5 Ge � r+rkxrad] Manna Samh [ � Park F � 7,+rturc�rtf i imrtxq' e.� c�,ysny h #l' I 84h2 tlWr�M1 fl dlnr � � Lh3Qi lbL—ra 16r1. } M:�{ pyknP EnyWjri �]' TO BMW I d zmiY M-~ F*�Sft ROW E&norda l��ihq MiS}II Ta-M-a ti�J{I _I 'I i VVM ria yy r�r try .-ewe Y *5 Edmonds Crossing preferred alternative " from the 2004 FEIS. 68 Land Use The project includes: oo A ferry terminal; oo A train station; oo A transit center for bus and regional transit, as well as the opportunity for riders to connect to downtown businesses via a local circulator service; oo The flexibility to operate the facility to respond to changing travel demands; oo Safety features including grade separation of train traffic from other modes of travel, designated vehicle parking and holding areas, and improved passenger waiting areas. While the Edmonds Crossing project will directly benefit the transportation system, the project will also provide significant benefits to downtown Edmonds. Completion of the project provides an opportunity to redevelop the existing ferry terminal facilities and the related holding lanes in the downtown area. Providing a connection from the new multimodal terminal to downtown Edmonds will potentially bring more visibility and visitors to the downtown area. R.-Plan Policies and Implementation Strategy. The vision and goals for Downtown Waterfront Downtown Jr'rdxfieAter ped rAar+1 C�rrifrnr4 N0 fiPJr<r« hq�IJarJff d 4*'l DesignYJFfrrF ilrx,raka' rk�� rr1FTl rryrt ram■ AA*' oncedr � VfpwC'fn"Arl;A ri,ry 1'rrrpJr�l l tn� _ pr�d�rsfrlun rnJrJret7Joa., WdirtrflYild f"rJrftrJkfefl' � ka }t "• ■ # CaMPruurrF kRJ! C r * ■ # # � ans Twioif �Ix iprj I� .k! ; ■_ ' F Y # ■ . i # # vC� # ■ ■ i#■ ■ , * * C0rw5nC� T'+nrJJkf� „rr1 dYvt • 5'ri4� v ■ fre&Tar[ i r " FLrq � - f fiJJr�rrrrf��iiJ1f ■ Jir4 i �J[YJ<�.Ylf�fllrw[f11�' CfY'MR #' - rr! Iwo l+Ifrptif y ■ A4 to ('rwridor.' j - 3r/M7lHOka {:o1010er'IrrJrJ —' — {lr,levun.s i'VrJr ecY imi ♦Nriilrt � 'i'SYJFY PIMP 14uflifimib, . r�'rJ'a3YitJ�'7�617f Gf Jr+7fJN 7YN'd Land Use 69 Activity Center are designed to present a coherent vision for future development in the area. To implement this vision, a series of policies and an implementation strategy are intended to guide future public and private actions. Implementation Strategy. Key issues tied to the viability and health of the downtown waterfront area include using the Edmonds Crossing project to help resolve transportation issues, linking downtown with the waterfront, and taking advantage of redevelopment opportunities arising from emerging trends and public investments. The largest single factor affecting the downtown waterfront area is the timing and construction of the Edmonds Crossing project. Because of this, a two -phased downtown waterfront redevelopment strategy is envisioned. The first phase includes actions taken before the existing ferry terminal is relocated to the Pt. Edwards site, and is intended to include actions taken to support ongoing redevelopment and arts -related improvements downtown. This phase will also set the framework for subsequent redevelopment after the terminal's relocation. The second phase is aimed at comprehensive redevelopment to link the downtown with the waterfront, better utilize shoreline resources, increase economic viability and provide the setting for a broad range of community functions. Short Term Actions. Short term actions are those actions that can take place prior to construction of the Edmonds Crossing project, ge er-a"y i the next 5 7 1. Develop a short term plan and strategy to address transportation conflicts and safe , issues involving the interaction of rail, ferry, vehicular and pedestrian traffic in the waterfront area. 4-2. Plan for the Edmonds Crossing project at Pt. Edwards which includes relocation of the existing ferry terminal. Planning should also include reuse of the current ferry terminal and related holding area. 23. Improve the existing downtown rail station between Dayton and Main Streets in order to better accommodate inter -city passenger and commuter rail service, including provisions for bus and commuter traffic as well as pedestrian connections to the waterfront and downtown. During the short term planning period, evaluate the feasibility and benefits of retaining a commuter rail and transit presence downtown after the construction of Edmonds Crossing. -34. Plan for future joint public/private development of the area between SR-104 and the railroad tracks. Planning activities could potentially include infrastructure planning, property acquisition, parking management, development incentives and guidelines or modifications to land use regulations (such as zoning or master planning). Although Amtrak and commuter rail service will be included as a part of the Edmonds Crossing project, the City and transit service providers should examine whether a commuter rail stop can be retained between Dayton and Main Streets in order to provide improved service and stimulate potential redevelopment of the surrounding area. 45. Upgrade secondary downtown streets for pedestrians. Implement the city's public urban design plan and street tree plan while expanding public amenities and streetscape improvements in areas where these do not already exist. These improvements are particularly needed along Main and Dayton Streets in the area between downtown and the waterfront in order to improve pedestrian connections between downtown and the waterfront area. Pedestrian improvements should be combined with traffic improvement projects where applicable. 70 Land Use -56. Continue to promote shoreline management and public access to the city's beaches, parks, and walkways. 67. Continue implementing a continuous shoreline walkway (boardwalk/esplanade) from Brackett's Landing North to Point Edwards. Work with the Port of Edmonds to integrate recreation and marina functions into the long term plan. -78. Work with the Senior Center to plan for long term needs for the senior center facilities and programs. ,99. Encourage a variety of housing to be developed as part of new development and redevelopment of downtown properties. Housing should be provided to serve a diverse community, including single family homes, multi family apartments and condominiums, housing as part of mixed use developments, and housing connected with live/work developments that could also encourage an arts - oriented community in the downtown area. A special focus for arts -supporting live/work arrangements could be in the corridor and nearby residential areas linking downtown with the Edmonds Center for the Arts. 910. Begin improvements to mitigate ferry terminal traffic (and other traffic) increases, as envisioned in the Edmonds Crossing project and the transportation element of the comprehensive plan. 4-911. Develop "gateways" at key entrances to the downtown area which enhance the identity and sense of place for downtown. Gateways should signal that visitors are entering downtown Edmonds, and should include elements such as public art, landscaping, signage and directional ("way -finding") aids. Long Term Actions. Long term actions are those actions that can take place during or after construction of the Edmonds Crossing project, . Complete a multi modal transportation center at Point Edwards for: oo Rail (inter -city and commuter) oo Ferry oo Park & Ride/Auto oo Bus oo Pedestrian and shuttle connections to other features and amenities. 2. Complete redevelopment of the Point Edwards site consistent with an overall master plan that provides for ^,.mmer-eia or mi, Eoa „se development compatible with the Edmonds Crossing project. 3. Coordinate circulation and public parking with Port development. 4. Continue to protect and enhance existing wetlands and continue to develop supporting non - intrusive interpretive trails and exhibits. 5. Continue development of a "necklace" of shoreline parks with improvements, focusing on missing links in the park and walkway system. Retain and expand existing parks, providing linkages whenever property acquisitions or easements become available for public use. Land Use 71 6. Encourage the development of centralized parking facilities as part of redevelopment projects. Under the right circumstances, these types of facilities can provide an efficient mechanism for consolidating expensive parking improvements while freeing up land for more intensive and desirable uses that support local housing, commercial, and pedestrian activities. Public/private partnerships should be explored when the opportunity arises, both in private and public projects (e.g. the commuter rail station downtown). Centralized parking facilities could be built as part of a master - planned mixed -use development. 7. Redevelop the existing ferry terminal site at the base of Main Street according to a master plan after the existing ferry terminal has been relocated to Point Edwards. This is a unique location, situated in the midst of a continuous park and beach setting, and provides opportunities for public/private partnerships. Ideas to be pursued include public "festival" entertainment or activity space, visitor moorage, park and public walkways, and other uses that would encourage this as to become a destination drawing people from south along the waterfront and eastward up into downtown. Redevelopment of this area should be done in a manner that is sensitive to and enhances the views down Main Street and from the adjoining parks and public areas. 8. Redevelop the area from the east side of SR-104 to the railroad tracks, from Harbor Square to Main Street, according to a mixed use master plan. This area could provide a significant opportunity for public/private partnerships. Under the right circumstances, consolidated parking or a pedestrian crossing to the waterfront could be possible as part of a redevelopment project. Every opportunity should be taken to improve the pedestrian streetscape in this area in order to encourage pedestrian activity and linkages between downtown and the waterfront. Uses developed along public streets should support pedestrian activity and include amenities such as street trees, street furniture, flowers and mini parks. Main and Dayton Streets should receive special attention for public art or art integrated into private developments to reinforce the visual arts theme for downtown. Redevelopment of this area should also take advantage of the ability to reconfigure and remove the ferry holding lanes paralleling SR-104 once the Edmonds Crossing project is developed. 9. Support redevelopment efforts that arise out of planning for the long term needs of the senior center. These plans should reinforce the center's place in the public waterfront, linking the facility to the walkways and parks along the shoreline. 10. New development and redevelopment in the downtown waterfront area should be designed to meet overall design objectives and the intent of the various "districts" described for the downtown area. .rs�ersre•_ear_ssirears�!�srrEssssx�:e�s�s!�:ee�� .�re!eetis�!�r�: _ 72 Land Use multimodal transit center- with compatible development in the stiffounding area. in addition to the OWN "i IN !te!rr�,r:e!�:e!��sssr.�e�ier:r�!sxrri..rssrs�s!�ssr_�s�:ressesnrrr.�rs�ers • E. i i. for- E. i i. for- -Eneour-age a mor-e aetive and vital setting fiew retail, offiee, efAe14aif1mef1 EA2. Support a mix of uses downtown which includes a variety of housing, eonuner-cial, and Land Use 73 IMM W design g-aidelines. & i 7. 12r-ovide for- thfeugheut the dovffi�o pedestfian oriented amenities eitizens and visitors MIM .I'll --2,71"A!tr.,e�r.� --Si'1'!L4't—rl:..... trS'SS�'J , > and aesthetic L.eauty. 74 Land Use Downtown Waterfront Districts. In addition to the goals and policies for the downtown waterfront area, the Comprehensive Plan Map depicts a number of districts in the downtown waterfront area. These districts are described below. Retail Core. The area immediately surrounding the fountain at 5t, and Main and extending along Main Street and Fifth Avenue is considered the historic center of Edmonds and building heights shall be pedestrian in scale and compatible with the historic character of this area. To encourage a vibrant downtown, first floor spaces should be designed with adequate ceiling height to accommodate a range of retail and commercial uses and the entry situated at street level. Uses are encouraged to be retail -compatible (i.e. retail or compatible service — e.g. art galleries, restaurants, real estate sales offices and similar uses that provide storefront windows and items for sale to the public that can be viewed from the street). The street front fagades of buildings must provide a high percentage of transparent window area and pedestrian weather protection along public sidewalks. Design guidelines should provide for pedestrian -scale design features, differentiating the lower, commercial floor from the upper floors of the building. Buildings situated around the fountain square must be orientated to the fountain and its associated pedestrian area. Arts Center Corridor. The corridor along 4th Ave N between the retail core and the Edmonds Center for the Performing Arts. To encourage a vibrant downtown, first floor spaces should be designed with adequate ceiling height to accommodate a range of retail and commercial uses, with commercial entries being located at street level. Building design and height shall be compatible with the goal of creating a pedestrian oriented arts corridor while providing incentives for the adaptive reuse of existing historic structures. Building entries for commercial buildings must provide pedestrian weather protection. Design guidelines should provide for pedestrian - scale design features, differentiating the lower floor from the upper floors of the building. The design of interior commercial spaces must allow for flexible commercial space, so that individual business spaces can be provided with individual doorways and pedestrian access directly to the public sidewalk. The streetscape should receive special attention, using trees, landscaping, and public art to encourage pedestrian activity. Private development projects should also be encouraged to integrate art into their building designs. Where single family homes still exist in this area, development regulations should allow for "live -work" arrangements where the house can accommodate both a business and a residence as principal uses. Uses supporting the arts center should be encouraged — such as restaurants, cafes, galleries, live/work use arrangements, and B&Bs. Downtown Mired Commercial. To encourage a vibrant downtown, first floor spaces should be designed with adequate ceiling height to accommodate a range of retail and commercial uses., with commercial entries at street level. Buildings can be built to the property line. Building heights shall be compatible with the goal of achieving pedestrian scale development. The first floor of buildings must provide pedestrian weather protection along public sidewalks. Design guidelines should provide for pedestrian -scale design features, differentiating the lower, commercial floor from the upper floors of the building. The design of interior commercial spaces must allow for flexible commercial space, so that individual business spaces can be provided with individual doorways and pedestrian access directly to the public sidewalk. When the rear of a property adjoins a residentially -designated property, floor area that is located behind commercial street frontage may be appropriate for residential use. Where single family homes still exist in this area, development regulations should allow for "live -work" arrangements where the house can accommodate both a business and a residence as principal uses. Downtown Mixed Residential. In this area, commercial uses would be allowed but not required (i.e. buildings could be entirely commercial or entirely residential, or anything in between). Land Use 75 Height and design of buildings shall conform to the standards of the Downtown Mixed Commercial District. Buildings facing the Dayton Street corridor should provide a pedestrian - friendly streetscape, providing pedestrian amenities and differentiating the ground floor from upper building levels. Downtown Master Plan. The properties between SR-104 and the railroad, including Harbor Square, the Edmonds Shopping Center (former Safeway site), and extending past the Commuter Rail parking area up to Main Street. This area is appropriate for design -driven master planned development which provides for a mix of uses and takes advantage of its strategic location between the waterfront and downtown. The location of existing taller buildings on the waterfront, and the site's situation at the bottom of "the Bowl," could enable a design that provides for higher buildings outside current view corridors. Any redevelopment in this area should be oriented to the street fronts, and provide pedestrian -friendly walking areas, especially along Dayton and Main Streets. Development design should also not ignore the railroad side of the properties, since this is an area that provides a "first impression" of the city from railroad passengers and visitors to the waterfront. Art work, landscaping, and modulated building design should be used throughout any redevelopment project. Shoreline Commercial. The waterfront, west of the railroad tracks between the public beaches and the Port (currently zoned CW). Consistent with the City's Shoreline Master Program, this area should allow a mix of public uses, supporting commercial uses, and water -oriented and water -dependent uses. Building heights shall be compatible with the goal of achieving pedestrian scale development while providing incentives to encourage public view corridors. Roof and building forms should be an important consideration in design guidelines for this area, because of its high sensitivity and proximity to public open spaces. Redevelopment should result in singular, landmark buildings of high quality design which take advantage of the visibility and physical environment of their location, and which contribute to the unique character of the waterfront. Pedestrian amenities and weather protection must be provided for buildings located along public walkways and street fronts. Master Plan Development. The waterfront area south of Olympic Beach, including the Port of Edmonds and the Point Edwards and multi modal developments. This area is governed by master plans for the Port of Edmonds, Point Edwards, and the Edmonds Crossing project as described in an FEIS issued on November 10, 2004. These areas are also developed consistent with the City's Shoreline Master Program, as it applies. Downtown Convenience Commercial. This is the south end of 5th Ave, south of Walnut. Commercial uses would be required on the first floor, but auto -oriented uses would be permitted in addition to general retail and service uses. To encourage a vibrant downtown, first floor spaces should be designed with adequate ceiling height to accommodate a range of retail and commercial uses. Weather protection would still be required, but to a lesser degree than the retail core and only when the building was adjacent to the sidewalk. Height and design of buildings shall conform to the standards of the Downtown Mixed Commercial District. When the rear of a property adjoins a residentially -designated property, floor area that is located behind the commercial street frontage may be appropriate for residential use. Planned Residential -Office. Several properties lie along the railroad on the west side of Sunset Ave between existing commercial zoning and Edmonds Street. This area is appropriate for small- scale development which provides for a mix of limited office and residential uses which provide a transition between the more intensive commercial uses along Main Street and the residential uses along Sunset Ave. Because the area of this designation is located adjacent to commercial development to the south, the railroad to the west, and is near both multiple family and single- 76 Land Use family residential development, this area should act as a transition between theses uses. Building design for this area should be sensitive to the surrounding commercial, multiple family and single-family character. Downtown Design Objectives. As a companion to the districts outlined above, general design objectives are included for the downtown waterfront area. These objectives are intended to encourage high quality, well designed projects to be developed in the downtown/ -waterfront area that reflect the values of the citizens of Edmonds. These design i objectives can be found in the Urban Design section of this document. Land Use 77 development lots, landseaping featwes is integral of par4dng how a building it4er-aets with pedestrian walkways its site and its suffounding and an part of envir-onmen4. Good desigfi and site pla i bieyeles g impacts to pedestrians,The and atAomobiles, minimizes potential negative e. Pfevide adequate par -king fer- eaeb dewlepment, btA keep ear-s from inteffer-ing with the pedestr-i str-eetseape— .rszerrre�s�re�ss5rie!Rra��rs�r�ss�se!sye�s!��:rssrt�sTsfYsrrzrfs commercial, a residential areas. defining the Gross 4 key ioter-seetiefis be by the and stfeet edge. walks should aeeenttiated treatments.sidewalks, 78 Land Use f��3'i.. fR41R�R'J.11,'lr.� fE!!�5!*Rff Land Use 79 building pedestrians,ineltiding eatfies, walkways,bus stops,pafk4fig afeas, Land Use 81 Site QYili.ieS, Storage, Tfash and Me 1,aai l boxes,a. Hide tmsigh4ly titility b. Miniffl.--ize noise and odor. >supplies, MET "M ME - Building height and me"Wien g-didelifies afe essential to er-e4e diver-sity in building ffili-4-4-iffilize shadows east by taller- buildings upofl the pedestrian m7eas and to efisufe eomplianee with polieies in the eity's Gompr-eheosiw Plan. Pr-oteeting views ffem p4lie par-ks and building entries as well as stfeet views to the motif4ains and Puget Sound afe an impoi4an� pa44 of Edmonds ehar-aete 82 Land Use !�.e�ssrss!�: �rs�i!see!!tie!�.�r�ees: rrerr!s�:�s!�i!seer�re!*��r� MI _MI '- _ rillillPill a. -bafge building masses shall be aw)ided in the down4ow-m water-ffon4 aetivity eentef. hafge building elements found along dowfitown's pedestfia-a streets. digar-en4 wall mc4er-jals with windows a -ad t-r-im, i to break up appafepA building masses in4o smal elements. Alheafi f-h-ea — tir-ation of a techniques be to site does not lead itself to friendly v�iog building mass, these result. alter -native should employed obtain a pedestrian Land Use 83 Si!ESliT�SllIS��:!!l.F�R'lfib:!!!*:'A�'i!lsT.lC�:!!1!F'ri!!lfiP!!!*:'At'i!R, I:WN "Milli WIN W I. 110 NO ll F ade Re ,its a. improve the pedestrian environment in the Downtown retail/commercial area by differentiating th pedestrian oriented stfeet level of buildings fFom upper- Aoor-s, d. Provide a httmam sea4e str-eetseape, breaking tip long fagades into defined fofms that eontintle fl. Create indivi"al identity in buildings, 84 Land Use .'!!!f!f!1�!!�Rlr!!1R5TlJ�S�!!1F �iEl�S'J_!�!.l7i5 T�!!Rf F.!!TJ•!�! T!}S'L�f '. iwAlli1. Sri Mwn��p o...." r��, - Compatibility the with stmounding environment, . i building F . Visual interest and ety fms . D o,l the .f la building es ees visualets fger- Land Use 85 Medical/Highway 99 Activity Center and Highway 99 Corridor 4—.Medical/Hi2hway 99 Vision. The Medical/Highway 99 activity center is intended to encourage the development of a pedestrian and transit oriented area focused on two master planned developments, Stevens-Swedish/Edmonds Hespita4-medical center and Edmonds-Woodway High School, with a related high -intensity development corridor along Highway 99. Highway 99 is characterized by a corridor of generally commercial development with less intense uses or designed transitions serving as a buffer between adjacent neighborhoods. In contrast, the overall character of the mixed use activity center is intended to be an intensively developed mixed use, pedestrian - friendly environment, in which buildings are linked by walkways served by centralized parking, and plantings and landscaping promote pedestrian activity and a park -like atmosphere. In addition to the general goals for activity centers, the Medical/Highway 99 activity center is intended to achieve the following goals: ee Goals for- the Medical/Highway 99 Activity Center Goals and Plan Policies. The following goals and policies are intended to achieve the framework goals for the Medical/Highway 99 ActiyiLv Center. Medical/Highway 99 Activity Center Goal A. T-e-eExpand the economic and tax base of the City of Edmonds by providing incentives for business and commercial redevelopment in a planned activity center. ,;e--Medical/Highway 99 Activity Center Goal B. Provide for an aesthetically pleasing business and residential community consisting of a mixed use, pedestrian -friendly atmosphere of attractively designed and landscaped surroundings and inter- connected development_ B.1 Encourage a more active and vital setting for new retail, office. and service businesses, supported by nearby residents and visitors from other parts of the region. M—.I-.a-B.2 Provide street trees, buffers, and landscape treatments which encourage and support an attractive mixed use pattern of development characterized by pedestrian walkways and centralized parking. Use these same features, in concert with site and building design, to provide a transition from higher -intensity mixed use development to nearby single family residential areas. 13.3 Provide a pleasant experience for pedestrians and motorists along major streets and in a planned activity center, and provide a ag try along 212th Street SW into the City of Edmonds.; 86 Land Use Medical/Highway 99 Activity Center Goal C. Recognize and plan for the distinct difference in opportunities and development character provided by the Highway 99 corridor versus the local travel and access patterns on local streets_ C.1 Uses adioining the Hiehwav 99 Corridor should provide more intensive levels of mixed use development, including higher building heights and greater density. However, pedestrian linkages to other portions of the activity center — and adjoining focus areas alone the Highway 99 Corridor — should still be provided in order to assist pedestrian circulation and provide access to transit. Medical/Highway 99 Activity Center Goal D. Promote the development of a mixed use area served by transit and accessible to pedestrians_ D.1 Provide a more efficient transportation system featuring increased bus service_ pedestrian and bicycle routes as well as adequate streets and parking areas. Transit service should be coordinated by transit providers and take advantage of links to future high -capacity transit that develops along corridors such as Highway 99. 99 ; Medical/Highway 99 Activity Center Goal E.To provide a buffer between the high -intensity, high-rise commercial areas along SR 99 and the established neighborhoods and public facilities west of 76th Avenue West_ E.1 Support a mix of uses without encroaching into single family neighborhoods. Uses adjoining single family neighborhoods should provide transitions between more intensive uses areas through a combination of building design, landscaping and visual buffering and pedestrian -scale streetscape design. Ge--Medical/Highway 99 Activity Center Goal F.; To discourage the expansion of strip commercial development and encourage a cohesive and functional activity center that allows for both neighborhood conservation and targeted redevelopment that includes an appropriate mix of single family and multiple dwelling units, offices, retail, and business uses, along with public facilities_ F.1 In some cases, heavy commercial development (e.g. wholesale or light industrial uses) may still be appropriate where these uses are separated from residential uses. 9e ; Land Use 87 Ge To pr-evide a pleasant exper4enee for- pedestrians and meter-ists aleng fnajer- streets and in planned aetivity eenter-, a -ad provide a gateway aleng 212th St+eet SW iRtE) the City Of EdmeaE6MedicaI/Hh!hwaY 99 Activity Center Goal G. 14.2. To provide an integrated network of pedestrian and bicycle circulation that connects within and through the activity center to existing residential areas, the high school, the hospital, and transit services and facilities. . _ . ersr�a�:�s�asres��e!rseer:rssrTsrr:Rsse�s 14.5. Development should be designed for both pedestrian and transit access. 88 Land Use and vita. o serif. H.7. Suppoi4 a mix of uses without enefeftehing into single family neighbofhoods. Uses adjoining single family neighbor -hoods should provide tr-a*sitioas between mor-e intensive uses areas thr-ough a eoffibin4ioa of building design, landseaping a -ad visual buffefing, a -ad pedestrian seale streetscape design. - .. - - - ON Land Use 89 J� Goals for- the Highway 99 Corridor Vision. Highway 99 occupies a narrow strip of retail and commercial uses bounded by residential neighborhoods. Historically, the corridor has developed in a patchwork of uses, without a clear focus or direction. To improve planning for the future of the corridor, the City established a task force in 2003-2004, resulting in the Highway 99 Enhancement Report and a related economic analysis. During this process, local residents were contacted and asked to participate in two focus groups to identify current problems and future aspirations for the corridor. After this preliminary survey with the residents, the City invited business owners to participate in two charrette meetings to brainstorm ideas and evaluate possible ways to induce redevelopment in the area. After concepts were developed, Berk & Associates, an economics consultant, performed a market assessment of the enhancement strategy. The following diagram summarizes the general approach that resulted from this work: a series of focus areas providing identity and a clustering of activity along the corridor, providing opportunities for improved economic development while also improving linkages between the corridor and surroundin 212" S1 Focus Areas along the Corridor FO r l} { [Rj jggUjh#r prridor aw Psrticularly inlCIVI,L 61g !31011u Ohs a," �F1'i L�L7r'4Sj�C,ifl]l ;i"SL "jai' 4t1�er ' 'r l>`hc CC1CYj �C�C�tI �CI'�{ry 1����.13 7 i�qC�,�� [�4'Lpy�lT7Lf F1ti rCjIT$s,UCS-)rIa�T]'�IS:i�rdCI{'rLS� & a!; we as I"'c�4 t c�ft i rtil l s` �4ii Chill-21CWT_ pcdesirian characleristic5 as well as 212" S1 a 1 6"" Sl Hospital Cof 114m y- 3}- and Fameiy Retail Hospital Cofr9rfluoiron% � and Famiiy Reta;l e2.,Y St center e29` St "Ck'TI'VlflryWk4mhIiJ'LN 19REff1Vc "Info ationa?Di1151, rec{aknife the folloWln;l UTCEIS: From the north to the south % -c "Inforfmationar District' rMILITkiZC the COI OWi11aTO,li= Thc hospital Crlrornunity and Vamily Ft IMI ['enter: 23T; St Tllo [ImI tal ['nnlmunily and Ilan �ih llr i�Yt1 Fl:il 1)istricl" 23T; St -Ark.t;: • ThL "International 1)istrie(" art.aj-l1L� Ri.sidentlal Area WHO CeptuLn • ThL Rt'rideotial ,area W04116-fWl4Niilerdal RC (i C %,' 14)1) nI a 11 VI I Ot el S 1,114r$Ylh%frii�gt Area. RC(iCvc1opnIC11011OtelS Improvement area. 234' Sf 2L h, St 23 Wos, St 24(Y' Sf 224" Sf Resodentoal A rlea Relari Center Resodentoal Area �x�ldfnfi efrraCZ116W om Rede velopmenllf-folets ComhWxui2&n&nf Area Rede velopmenllf-folets lmpmvemenf Area g residential areas. 90 Focus Areas along the Corridor 16"Sl Land U, Highway 99 Corridor Goals and Plan Policies. The following goals and policies are intended to achieve the framework goals for the Highway 99 Corridor. Highway 99 Corridor Goal A. Improve access and circulation. Access to businesses for both pedestrians and automobiles is difficult along major portions of the corridor. The inability of pedestrians to cross the street and for automobiles to make safe turns is a critical limitation on enhanced development of the corridor into a stronger economic area. Better pedestrian crossings are also needed to support transit use, especially as Highway 99 becomes the focus of future high capacity transit initiatives. A.1 Provide for pedestrian access and circulation within development focus areas, while coordinating with high -capacity transit alongthe he Highway 99 corridor. A.2 Use traffic sianals. access management. and rechannelization to facilitate pedestrian, business, and residential access while maintaining traffic capacity along SR 99. The City should work collaboratively with WSDOT on these issues, and to develop a circulation management plan. In some cases the impacts of the traffic signals can be enhanced by access management, rechannelization and other measures. A.3 Make the corridor more attractive and pedestrian -friendly (e.g., add trees and landscaping,) through a combination of development requirements and — when available — public investment. A.4 Route auto traffic to encourage efficient access to new and existingdevelopment evelopment while minimizing impacts to surrounding residential neighborhoods. Highway 99 Corridor Goal B. The City should consider the different sections along the corridor and emphasize their unique opportunities rather than view the corridor as an undifferentiated continuum. Street improvements and, in some cases regulatory measures can encourage these efforts. Focus on specific nodes or segments within the corridor. Identity elements such as signage should indicate that the corridor is within the City of Edmonds, and show how connections can be made to downtown and other Edmonds locations. B.1 New development should be high -quality and varied — not generic — and include amenities for pedestrians and patrons. B.2 The Citv will encourage the retention of commercial uses which provide high economic benefit to the city, such as new auto dealerships, and encourage these types of uses to locate within the Highway 99 Corridor. When these uses are proposed to be located within one of the corridor focus areas, these uses should also comply with the goals and policies outlined for each focus area. Land Use 91 92 Land Use B.3 Provide a system of "focus areas" along the corridor which provide opportunities for clusters of development, or themed development areas. Providing focus points for development is intended to help encourage segmentation of the long Highway 99 corridor into distinct activity nodes which will encourage an Edmonds character and identity for the corridor. Concepts for the different focus areas identified in -the "Highway 99 Corridor Vision" include the following: The "Hospital Community and Family WIN Iffl, WIMINIMMIN, M-7-p r M1,0- -a- WAIN W III M- 47t : � Land Use 93 ,;e—Highway 99 Corridor Goal C. Encourage development that is sensitive to surrounding neighborhoods. During the City's Highway 99 Task Force work, residents noted that they needed a number of services that are not presently provided along the corridor. This can provide an opportunity that might be part of a larger business strategy. At the same time, new development should contribute to the residential quality of the adjacent neighborhoods. C.1 Protect residential qualities and connect businesses with the local community. Pedestrian connections should be made available as part of new development to connect residents to appropriate retail and service uses. C.2 New development should be allowed and encouraged to develop to the fullest extent possible while assuring that the design quality and amenities provided contribute to the overall character and quality of the corridor. Where intense development adjoins residential areas, site design (including buffers, landscaping and the arrangement of uses) and building design should be used to minimize adverse impacts on residentially -zoned properties C.3 Provide adequate buffering between higher intensity uses and adjoining residential neighborhoods Highway 99 Corridor Goal D. Encourage a variety of uses and building types. A variety of uses and building types is appropriate to take advantage of different opportunities and conditions. For example, a tall hotel or large scale retail development may be an excellent addition to the south of the corridor while some small restaurants and convenience shops might cater to hospital employees, trail users and local residents near 216th Street SW. Where needed, the City should consider zoning changes to encourage mixed use or taller development to occur. D.1 Upgrade the architectural and landscape design qualities of the corridor. Establish uniform signage regulations for all properties within the corridor area which provide for business visibility and commerce while minimizing clutter and distraction to the public. D.2 Within the Corridor, highrise nodes should be located to provide for maximum economic use of suitable commercial land. Highrise nodes should be: D.2.a Supported by adequate services and facilities; D.2.b Designedprovide a visual asset to the community through the use of distinctive forms and materials, articulated facades, attractive landscaping, and similar techniques. D.2.c Designed to take advantage of different forms of access, including automobile, transit and pedestrian access. D.2.d Designed to provide adequate buffering from lower intensity uses and residential neighborhoods. 94 Land Use Land Use 95 NEW AUXEO USE ��1L0! f AETA11 FE1'k7.�NM1Ek79 F3f15TiM[1 REBOENTKL COWUX NEW TRRAFFM UGHT WA 1. Fr�outs sa AlIPf2OHE TRAFiTC AeeFss , YO J=FTFE55 ANp f'FD!!E&TRJJYR FNNRonw1EHT� TI PWSMm R€s1[1 ML CCWLEX w Jmw ft / k AREAS MTH LU MVEG RAAFRG ARO Pti EST m AGGEBSEROM SURP9UNMNG RE3i0ENTULAREAS 96 Land Use 2381h St 240th St Rj rr I Ml M, I I Sm - �7- will k- I I@ . a WWWKIIPMV�VAMML.Wl ii I LWA.,*Lllllll I Mll1~1 IVOWAL�- r--1 0 ff VAT u A Land Use 97 wpm III M-2111111I LOONELVMLWP.WAIN,- • . - • • •� i • • • IN i • i i i . • & . . •OWES,. . • • • • . . . . A . . IN • . . • • • i r • .ENSIM 98 Land Use �- j Wag 5 LWILV M . VA NI LU 11V I M11 V. Master Planned Development Master Planned Developments are areas dominated by a special set of circumstances which allow for a highly coordinated, planned development, with phasing over time. These master plans describe a special purpose and need for the facilities and uses identified, and provide a clear design which fits with the character of their surroundings. The master plans describe the land use parameters and relationships to guide future development on the sites (height, bulk, types and arrangements of uses, access and circulation). All development within areas identified in each master plan shall be consistent with the provisions of the master plan. When located within a designated activity center, development within a master plan area shall be consistent with the goals and policies identified for the surrounding activity center. The following Master Plans are adopted by reference: A. Edmonds-Woodway High School B. Stevens Hospital D EB. City Park D C. Pine Ridge Park E—D. Southwest County Park ! InM.Mr r. .r�ns�rrr�:e�ss!�s•�re!�efr•-z r�-Mr..�:ee�: In addition to the master plans listed above, master plans can also be implemented through zoning contracts or other implementation actions, rather than being adopted as part of the plan. In these cases, the master plan must still be consistent with the comprehensive plan goals and policies for the area. Land Use 99 Residential Development & General. The City of Edmonds is unique among cities in Washington st-ateState. Located on the shores of Puget Sound, it has been able to retain (largely through citizen input) a small town, quality atmosphere rare for cities so close to major urban centers. The people of Edmonds value these amenities and have spoken often in surveys and meetings over the years. The geographical location also influences potential growth of Edmonds. Tucked between Lynnwood, Mountlake Terrace and Puget Sound, the land available for annexation and development is limited. Living standards in Edmonds are high, and this combined with the limited development potential, provides the opportunity for constructive policy options to govern future development. This will ensure an even better quality of life for its citizens. Edmonds consists of a mixture of people of all ages, incomes and living styles. It becomes a more humane and interesting city as it makes room for and improves conditions for all citizens. When the City's first comprehensive plan completed under the State Growth Management Act was adopted in 1995, the City adopted plan designations for single family areas that were based in large measure on historical development patterns, which often recognized development limitations due to environmentally sensitive areas (slopes, landslide hazards, streams, etc.). „. • 100 Land Use ••W&WAIM I. - In 2004. the Citv refined its land use and zoning mans to more closelv relate its large lot zoning to existing critical areas patterns. City staff analyzed the pattern of critical areas compared with land use designations, and applied the following logic to identify areas that could and could not be justified for continuing to be designated for large lot single family development. Land use and zoning designations were adjusted during the 2004/2005 plan update process to provide for this increased level of consistent. . �s�etr�i �!s!�e�srre!rrs�s�r� •, _.. ... Land Use 101 11111 W. WIN WI 01 ~11 =5:? ' _— � f� , narr�e�e�r.�r. re:sErrs i�r�rr�rsrr� Plan Designatio-n- Zoning Cl Issifleation Maximum Density (Net Density) $mg-f '7.3 T'�avnicrc R7&4 c . c. T`�- av7/izcry 102 Land Use M- 1. IN Land Use 103 Residential Goal A. High quality residential development which is appropriate to the diverse lifestyle of Edmonds residents should be maintained and promoted. The options available to the City to influence the quality of housing for all citizens should be approached realistically in balancing economic and aesthetic considerations, in accordance with the following policies: Ek4-. A.1 Encourage those building custom homes to design and construct homes with architectural lines which enable them to harmonize with the surroundings, adding to the community identity and desirability. Ek2-. A.2 Protect neighborhoods from incompatible additions to existing buildings that do not harmonize with existing structures in the area. t4k� A.3 Minimize encroachment on view of existing homes by new construction or additions to existing structures. EA-. A.4 Support retention and rehabilitation of older housing within Edmonds whenever it is economically feasible. H-4-& A.5 Protect residential areas from incompatible land uses through the careful control of other types of development and expansion based upon the following principles: 114.b. A.S.a Residential privacy is a fundamental protection to be upheld by local government. € .4-E A.5. b Traffic not directly accessing residences in a neighborhood must be discouraged. ,W 4 d, A.5. c Stable property values must not be threatened by view, traffic or land use encroachments. Vie. A.5.d Private property must be protected from adverse environmental impacts of development including noise, drainage, traffic, slides, etc. A.6 Require that new residential development be compatible with the natural constraints of slopes, soils, geology, vegetation and drainage. Residential Goal B.Goal. A broad range of housing types and densities should be encouraged in order that a choice of housing will be available to all Edmonds residents, in accordance with the following policies: 1.4-. B.1 Planned Residential Development. Provide options for planned residential development solutions for residential subdivisions. fir- B.1.a Encourage single-family homes in a PRD configuration where significant benefits for owner and area can be demonstrated (trees, view, open space, etc.). 104 Land Use B. L b Consider attached single-family dwelling units in PRD's near downtown and shopping centers as an alternative to multiple family zoning. B.2 Multiple. The City's development policies encourage high quality site and building design to promote coordinated development and to preserve the trees, topography and other natural features of the site. Stereotyped, boxy multiple unit residential (RM) buildings are to be avoided. 1. 2. a. B.2.a Location Policies. 12. a. i. B.2. a. i. RM uses should be located near arterial or collector streets. B.2.b Compatibility Policies. Lam . b. i. B.2. b. iRM RM developments should preserve the privacy and view of surrounding buildings, wherever feasible. A 2. b.ti. B.2. b. ii The height of RM buildings that abut single family residential (RS) zones shall be similar to the height permitted in the abutting RS zone except where the existing vegetation and/or change in topography can substantially screen one use from another. 1B.2. b. iii The design of RM buildings located next to RS zones should be similar to the design idiom of the single family residence. A?E B.2.c. General Design Policies. 12.e.i. B.2.c.i The nonstructural elements of the building (such as decks, lights, rails, doors, windows and window easements, materials, textures and colors) should be coordinated to carry out a unified design concept. 12.e.i-i. B.2. c. ii SSite and building plans should be designed to preserve the natural features (trees, streams, topography, etc) of the site rather than forcing the site to meet the needs of the imposed plan. B.3 Mobile Homes. Update design standards to ensure quality parks heavily landscaped both for screening exterior and for appearance of interior. Commercial Land Use General. Past and present commercial development in the City of Edmonds has been oriented primarily to serving the needs of its citizens. It also has attempted to offer a unique array of personalized and specialty type shopping opportunities for the public. In the downtown area, the Milltown shopping arcade is an excellent example of this type of development. It is essential that future commercial developments continue to harmonize and enhance the residential small town character of Edmonds that its citizens so strongly desire to retain. By the same token, the City should develop a partnership with business, citizens and residents to help it grow and prosper while assisting Land Use 105 to meet the various requirements of the City's codes and policies. The Highway 99 arterial has been recognized historically as a commercial district which adds to the community's tax and employment base. Its economic vitality is important to Edmonds and should be supported. Commercial development in this area is to be encouraged to its maximum potential. Commercial Development Goals and Plan Policies. The following sections describe the general goals and policies for all commercial areas (commercial, community commercial, neighborhood commercial, Westgate Corridor, Edmonds Way Corridor, and sexually oriented businesses), followed by the additional goals and policies that specific commercial areas must also meet. K-. CoalsfeiCommercial Development Goal A.: Commercial development in Edmonds shall be located to take advantage of its unique locational opportunities while being consistent and compatible with the character of its surrounding neighborhood. All commercial development should be designed and located so that it is economically feasible to operate a business and provide goods and services to Edmonds residents and tourists in a safe, convenient and attractive manner, in accordance with the following policies: K-.4-. A.1 A sufficient number of sites suited for a variety of commercial uses should be identified and reserved for these purposes. The great majority of such sites should be selected from parcels of land already identified in the comprehensive plan for commercial use and/or zoned for such use. K72-. A.2 Parcels of land previously planned or zoned for commercial use but which are now or will be identified as unnecessary, or inappropriate for such use by additional analysis, should be reclassified for other uses. 1£4-. A.3 The proliferation of strip commercial areas along Edmonds streets and highways and the development of commercial uses poorly related to surrounding land uses should be strongly discouraged. I-.4 A.4 The design and location of all commercial sites should provide for convenient and safe access for customers, employees and suppliers. I� A.5 All commercial developments should be carefully located and designed to eliminate or minimize the adverse impacts of heavy traffic volume and other related problems on surrounding land uses. 1& A.6 Special consideration should be given to major land use decisions made in relation to downtown Edmonds. Commercial Development Goal B. G, 's e r C .mm u ni , C-onini,,, eial 4l e5 y. Community Coommercial areas are comprised of commercial development serving a dual purpose: services and shopping for both local residents and regional traffic. The intent of the community commercial designation is to recognize both of these purposes by permitting a range of business and mixed use development while maintaining a neighborhood scale and design character. 106 Land Use B.1 Permit uses in community commercial areas that serve both the local neighborhood and regional through -traffic. L2, B.2 Provide for transit and pedestrian access in addition to the need to accommodate automobile traffic. B.3 Provide for the pedestrian -scale design of buildings that are two stories or less in height and that contain architectural features that promote pedestrian activity. L.4. BA Provide pedestrian walkways and transit connections throughout the community commercial area, assuring connections to nearby residential neighborhoods. Commercial Development Goal C. GeatsfLr AleighbaAaad Genmiereia! A . Neighborhood Coommercial areas are intended to provide a mix of services, shopping, gathering places, office space, and housing for local neighborhoods. The scale of development and intensity of uses should provide a middle ground between the more intense commercial uses of the Highway 99 Corridor/ Medical area and the Downtown Activity Area. Historically, many of the neighborhood commercial areas in Edmonds have developed as classically auto -oriented commercial "strip malls" with one- and two-story developments primarily including retail and service uses. Throughout the region, neighborhood commercial areas are departing from this historical model by being redeveloped as appealing mixed -use clusters, providing attractive new pedestrian -oriented development that expands the uses and services available to local residents. M.C.1 3Yrr Neighborhood commercial development should be located at major arterial intersections and should be designed to minimize interference with through traffic. Mz? C.2 Permit uses in neighborhood commercial areas that are intended to serve the local neighborhood. Mixed use development should be encouraged within neighborhood commercial areas. M-.3-. C.3 Provide for transit and pedestrian access, with the provision of facilities for local automobile traffic. Provide for pedestrian connections to nearby residential neighborhoods. M:4. C.4 Allow a variety of architectural styles while encouraging public art and sustainable development practices that support pedestrian activity and provide for appealing gathering places. M-.5-. C.5 Significant attention should be paid to the design of ground level commercial spaces, which must accommodate a variety of commercial uses, have street -level entrances, and storefront facades that are dominated by transparent windows. Land Use 107 M.5.a. C.6 Encourage neighborhood commercial areas to reflect the identity and character of individual neighborhoods, t4asthus are stren henin their importance as neighborhood centers. Neighborhood commercial areas may set additional specific goals for their community in order to further refine the specific identity they wish to achieve. Goals and policies for specific neighborhood centers are detailed below. C.6.a Five Corners .5.b.i. C.6.a.i In the Five Corners neighborhood commercial area, development should be oriented to the street and respond to the unique character of the intersection, including a planned intersection improvement. Parking should be provided at the rear of development, where possible, or underground. C.6.a.ii Development shall not be more than four stories in height, and the design should focus on breaking up the mass and bulk of buildings by incorporating such features as setbacks, varying rooflines, and landscaping into the design of the site. The mix of uses should include not less than one quarter commercial space. C.6.a.iiiAt a minimum, commercial uses should be located on the ground level of development. Commercial or residential uses may occupy upper levels. C.6.a.iv. As a major intersection, streetscape and way -finding design should create an attractive "gateway" to the downtown and other neighborhoods. (Link to streetscape plan update) Intersection and street design should accommodate and encourage pedestrian connections throughout the neighborhood commercial area. M. 5. e. C.6.b. Firdale Village C. 6. a. i In the Firdale Village commercial area, development should include an attractive mix of uses that create a "neighborhood village" pedestrian -oriented environment. Commercial spaces shall be oriented toward the street in order to maximize visibility, and parking should be primarily accommodated either behind or underneath structures. C.6.a.ii Development shall not be more than four stories in height, and the design should focus on breaking up the mass and bulk of buildings by incorporating such features as setbacks, varying rooflines, and landscaping into the design of the site. The mix of uses should include not less than one quarter commercial space. M. Commercial Development Goal D. The Westgate Corridor is generally located between the 100t" Avenue W (9th Avenue S)/Edmonds Way intersection and where Edmonds Way turns north to enter the downtown area. By virtue of this location, this corridor serves as both a key transportation corridor and as an entry into the downtown. Long-established neighborhoods lie near both sides of the corridor. The plan for this corridor is to recognize its 108 Land Use multiple functions by providing opportunities for small-scale businesses while promoting compatible development that will not intrude into established neighborhoods. l� D.1 Development within the Westgate Corridor should be designed to recognize its role as part of an entryway into Edmonds and the downtown. The overall effect should be a corridor that resembles a landscaped boulevard and median. The landscaped median along SR-104 should remain as uninterrupted as possible in order to promote traffic flow and provide an entry effect. D.2 Permit uses in planned business areas that are primarily intended to serve the local neighborhood while not contributing significantly to traffic congestion. N.3-. D.3 Provide for transit and pedestrian access to development. 1.4. DA Use design review to encourage the shared or joint use of driveways and access points by development onto SR-104 in order to support the movement of traffic in a safe and efficient manner. Site access shall not be provided from residential streets unless there is no feasible alternative. D.5 Use design review to ensure that development provides a transition to adjacent residential neighborhoods. For uses in transitional areas adjacent to single family neighborhoods, use design techniques such as the modulation of facades, pitched roofs, stepped -down building heights, multiple buildings, and landscaping to provide designs compatible with single family development. Commercial Development Goal E. . The Edmonds Way Corridor consists of portions of Edmonds Way between the 100th Avenue West intersection and Highway 99. This corridor serves as a key transportation corridor, and also provides a key link between Edmonds and Interstate 5. Established residential areas lie on both sides of the corridor. An established pattern of multiple family residential development lies along much of the corridor, while small-scale businesses can be found primarily near intersections. A major concern is that the more intensive development that occurs along the corridor should not interfere with the flow of through traffic or intrude into adjoining established communities. E.1 Permit uses in planned multiple family or small-scale business developments that are designed to minimize contributing significantly to traffic congestion. QQ? E.2 Provide for transit and pedestrian access to development. 9L. � E.3 Use design review to encourage the shared or joint use of driveways and access points by development onto SR-104 in order to support the movement of traffic in a safe and efficient manner. Site access should not be provided from residential streets unless there is no feasible alternative. Land Use 109 9.4 EA Use design review to ensure that development provides a transition to adjacent residential neighborhoods. For uses in transitional areas adjacent to single family neighborhoods, use design techniques such as the modulation of facades, pitched roofs, stepped -down building heights, multiple buildings, and landscaping to provide designs compatible with single family development. Make use of natural topography to buffer incompatible development whenever possible. g Commercial Development Goal F. Geatsfs.r Seivua1-4 04&4ed Businesses.. ej &xua11 Oriented Businesses are regulated by specific licensing and operating provisions in the City Code. However, land use and zoning regulations are also required to mitigate and reduce the adverse secondary effects of these uses. These secondary effects are detailed in the findings adopted by Ordinance No. 3117 on October 15, 1996. As commercial uses, sexually oriented businesses should be limited to areas which can support the traffic and site requirements of these businesses while also assuring that their adverse secondary effects are mitigated. The following policies apply to sexually oriented businesses: P F.1 Provide for potential commercial locations within the City for sexually oriented businesses which will provide at least a minimum separation and buffering necessary to protect public health and safety. Pam? F.2 Separate the location of sexually oriented businesses from uses that are incompatible with the secondary effects associated with sexually oriented businesses. These incompatible uses include residential uses and uses such as public parks, public libraries, museums, public or private schools, community centers, and religious facilities. They also include bars and taverns. P-.-3-. F.3 Adopt specific development regulations, such as lighting, parking and access provisions, that are designed to reduce or mitigate the secondary effects of sexually oriented businesses. P-4. FA Provide a mechanism to monitor, on an annual basis, the availability of potential sites for the location of sexually oriented businesses. Industrial Land Use Q-. General. Interestingly, industrial development played a major role in the early development of Edmonds. Sawmills, wharves, log ponds and other wood products industries lined the Edmonds waterfront at the turn of the twentieth century. However, as time passed, Edmonds developed into a very attractive residential community and its once thriving lumber industry faded into oblivion. Today, Edmonds still retains much of its residential, small town charm despite the large amount of urban development which has occurred in and around the City during the outward expansion of the Seattle metropolitan area during the past twenty-five years. Industrial development in the more traditional sense has not occurred in Edmonds to a significant degree since its early Milltown days. Most new industry which has located in the community since the 1950's has been largely of light manufacturing or service industry nature. Some examples include furniture manufacturing, printing and publishing, electronic components assembly and health care services. 110 Land Use Future industrial development should be carefully controlled in order to insure that it is compatible with the residential character of Edmonds. Small scale, business -park oriented light industries and service related industries should be given preference over more intensive large scale industries. Great care should be given to carefully siting and designing all new industrial development in order to fully minimize or eliminate its adverse off -site impacts. R-. Industrial Land Use Goal A. A select number of industrial areas should be located and developed which are reasonably attractive and contribute to the economic growth and stability of Edmonds without degrading its natural or residential living environment, in accordance with the following policies: 1� A.1 Light industrial uses should be given preference over heavy industrial uses. 1�? A.2 The clustering of industrial uses in planned industrial parks should be required when the site is adequate. R-. 3 -. A.3 Adequate buffers of landscaping, compatible transitional land uses and open space should be utilized to protect surrounding land areas from the adverse effects of industrial land use. Particular attention should be given to protecting residential areas, parks and other public -institutional land uses. R-.4 A.4 All industrial areas should be located where direct access can be provided to regional ground transportation systems (major State Highways and/or railroad lines). Open Space Generally fin w-ba-m areas, a laek of open spaee has been one of the major- eaidses of r-esidenti neighbor -heeds to per-iphefal afeas still possessing open afeas. Open space is important in defining the character of the Edmonds area and should be preserved and enhanced for enjoyment by current and future generations. Open space provides many benefits for people and natural systemsm-ust be r-esei=ved now for- assufanee that f u4we settled areas e -elie .oa b. signifieapA open !and, providing r-eer-eational eppefPanifies as well as visiW appeat Not all vaea-PA 4ad in the City should be eensider-ed desirable or- valuable for- open spae-e developed for- detefmining these afeas most impat4ant fef this elassifieat GeahpRgg Space Goal A. Open space must be seen as an essential element determining the character and quality of the dmonds environment, in accordance with the following policies. A.1 Undeveloped public property should be studied to determine its suitability and appropriate areas designed as open space. Land Use 111 T 1. a- A.1.a No city -owned property should be relinquished until all possible community uses have been explored. T-. ? A.2. All feasible means should be used to preserve the following open spaces: Y-� A.2.a Lands which have unique scientific or educational values. Y-� A.2.b Areas which have an abundance of wildlife. particularly where there are habitats of rare or endangered species. Y-� A.2.c Natural and green belt areas adjacent to highways and arterials with the priority to highways classified as scenic. A.2.d Areas which have steep slopes or are in major stream drainage ways, particularly those areas which have significance to Edmonds residents as water sheds or natural drainage ways. Y� A.2.e Land which can serve as buffers between residential and commercial or industrial development. �?f A.2.f Bogs and wetlands. IL.2-.g A.2.gLand which can serve as buffers between high noise environments and adjacent uses. �?h. A.2.h Lands which would have unique suitability for future passive or active recreational uses boA 19assive alld aefive. T?-i. A.2.i Areas which would have unique rare or endangered types of vegetation. - A.3 Open space should be distributed throughout the urban areas in such a manner that there is both visual relief and variety in the pattern of development and that there is sufficient space for active and passive recreation. Provide views and open space in areas of high density rehousing by requiring adequate setback space and separation between structures. Open Space Goal B. Goal. Edmonds possesses a most unique and valuable quality in its location on Puget Sound. The natural supply of prime recreational open space, particularly beaches and waterfront areas, must be accessible to the public, in accordance with the following policies: U4-. B.1 Edmonds saltwater shorelines and other waterfront areas should receive special consideration in all future acquisition and preservation programs. LL-2-. B.2 Wherever possible, -Provide rou vide wherever- possible, vehieu pedestfian up blic access to public bodies of water. Soils and Topography General. The natural topography of the city contributes to the environmental amefii�-character of the community. Many of the remaining undeveloped areas of the city are located on hillsides or in ravines where steep slopes have discouraged development. These are f o,,, entl can often be areas where natural drainage ways and stands of trees or habitat exist and .,,here the seeen gr-e t4 forest is 112 Land Use till „rdistu,.be . In some areas, soil conditions also exist which are severely limited for ,,certain kinds of development. Based on soil, and -slope, and geological analysis for the city, s€vefal areas may be identified as potentially hazardous for ,,specific types of development. (See -epeft to Eavi .eamerta Sube,,.,unittee o Soils and rr,,..egr-.,phy, Foy....,. y 3 1975.4 Some areas which are limited for intensive development afe—ma3L be desirable for public recreation, open spaces, conservation of existing natural features, maintenance of valuable biological communities, and protection of natural storm drainage systems. In some hillside areas, changes in existing soil characteristics because of development, grading, increased runoff and removal of vegetation may cause severe erosion, water pollution and flooding with subsequent damage to public and private property. Soils and Topography Goal A. Future development in areas of steep slope and potentially hazardous soil conditions should be based on site development which preserves the natural site characteristics in accordance with the following policies: W4, A.1 Large lots or flexible subdivision procedures, such as PRD's, should be used in these areas to preserve the site and reduce impervious surfaces, cuts and fills. W72, A.2 Streets and access ways should be designed to conform to the natural topography, reduce runoff and minimize grading of dw-hillsides. Soils and Topography Goal B. Geak Development on steep slopes or hazardous soil conditions should preserve the natural features of the site, in accordance with the following policies: B.1 Grading and Filling. X. 1. a- B.1.a Grading, filling, and tree cutting shall be restricted to building pads, driveways, access ways and other impervious surfaces. fib. B.1. b Grading shall not jeopardize the stability of any slope, or of an adjacent property. X. B.1. c Only minimal amounts of cut and fill on hillsides exceeding 1 S% slope should be permitted so that the natural topography can be preserved. Fill shall not be used to create a yard on steeply sloped property. B. Ld Fill and excavated dirt shall not be pushed down the slope. B.2. Building Construction. X 2. a- B.2.a Buildings on slopes of 1 S% or greater shall be designed to cause minimum disruption to the natural topography. Land Use 113 X. 2. Ir. B.2. b Retaining walls are discouraged on steep slopes. If they are used they should be small and should not support construction of improvements which do not conform to the topography. X 2. E B.2.c Water detention devices shall be used to maintain the velocity of runoff at predevelopment levels. B.3. Erosion Control. X3.a. B.3.a Temporary measures shall be taken to reduce erosion during construction. B.3. b Natural vegetation should be preserved wherever possible to reduce erosion and stabilize slopes, particularly on the downhill property line. X 3. E B.3.c Slopes should be stabilized with deep rooted vegetation and mulch, or other materials to prevent erosion and siltation of drainage ways. INA ■ drainage coufses and other major stmettffes to accommodate runoff water. ee- -A us e, (o ft re I i m a t , to-pegraphy a -ad seil eenditions, severe erosion and drainage to str-eafn banks may aeeur- with ao 4. A"r-e !*si�s_tis•riseeers�� ■ _ .rrr�:es�:eersr.�:rYess. _ 114 Land Use Mim It pm 7 1 AA The fiatccrral di-7aifiage system (ice,stfeams s ccrm'1-i"iaar-s • shall no be filled . permanently calverted except .,here n other alter -native exists. Temporary eulwi4ing of streams shall be permitted dufing eonstmetion wher- eofiditions -present no other- altefa4ive. The natural eofidition should be f:estef:e immediately following v,stfuet:,.n of fisT Land Use 115 Vegetation and Wildlife General. As Edmonds has urbanized, the „native vegetation has become increasingly scarce. The city's woodlands, marshes and other areas containing natural vegetation provide an important resource which should be preserved. Woodlands help stabilize soils on steep slopes, and act as barriers to wind and sound. Natural vegetation provides habitat for wildlife. Plants replenish the soil with nutrients. They generate oxygen and clean pollutants from the air. The beauty of the natural growth provides pleasing vistas and helps to buffer one development from another. Areas where natural vegetation exists provide good sites for nature trails and for other recreational and educational opportunities. Wildlife is a valuable natural resource that greatly enhances the aesthefie quality of human life. City beaches, breakwaters and pilings represent unique habitats for marine organisms. "People . . of organisms is diminishing year-ly. Streams, lakes and saltwater areas offer habitats for many species of migrating and resident bird life. Under-deve effe -Wooded areas and city parks provide habitats for many birds and mammals. Many birds and mammals are dependent upon both the upland and beach areas. B13-.Veuetation and Wildlife Goal A. The city should ensure that its woodlands, marshes and other areas containing natural vegetation are preserved, in accordance with the following policies: BB. 1.A.1 Critical areas will be designated and protected using the best available science (BAS). BB-2. A.2 The removal of trees should be minimized, particularly when they are located on steep slopes or hazardous soils. Subdivision layouts, buildings and roads should be designed so that existing trees are preserved. BB.3. A.3 Trees that are diseased, damaged, or unstable should be removed. BB�A.4 Grading should be restricted to building pads and roads only. Vegetation outside these areas should be preserved. C�Vegetation and Wildlife Goal B. Goal. The city should promote and increase public awareness and pride in its wildlife heritage. Special emphasis should be directed toward preserving the natural habitats (woodlands, marshes, streams and beaches) of the city's wildlife in accordance with the following policies: 116 Land Use CC. 1. B.1 Establish and maintain a variety of educational and recreational programs and activities for all age levels. GG.2. B.2 Erect and maintain arreducational displays that idenAifies identi some of the more common plants and animals and the ecology of major habitats, (i�c.&., sand, rock, piling and deepwater). GG.3. B.3 Prevent the unnecessary disturbance of native species and organisms from beach and near -shore environments. Establish and ..,,blieize Fee u' tie fis CC.4. BA Encourage landscaping and site improvement on city -owned property which recognizes value of habitat in overall site design. th aepen eney of seme Air Pollution DD-. General. Air pollution is primarily a regional problem related to urbanization and meteorological conditions in the Puget Sound Basin. It is the result of activities in which most citizens participate. Air pollution can cause severe health effects and property damage under certain conditions. (SeeFaets e Air- Pelh tie r-Regional a -ad bee-al� RepeFt to Eewwmait-y Developnen Task ­.) Air Pollution Goal A. Clean air is a right to all citizens of the City of Edmonds and should be protected and maintained in accordance with the following policies: A.1 Discourage expansion of arterials which will substantially increase line sources of pollution. €E.2. A.2 Encourage arrangement of activities which will generate the fewest necessary automobile trip miles while avoiding undue concentration of like uses. A.3 Support, through political action, strong enforcement policies and ordinances in the regional pollution control agency. E£.4 AA Support, by political action and financial participation, the establishment of public transportation in the community as an alternative to dependence on individual vehicles. EE.5. A.5 Encourage programs ms supporting commute trip reductionlee ntefear- peelin Land Use 117 Noise Pollution F-F- General. Although no area of human activity is free of sound, the modern urban environment is increasingly suffering from an overload of sound in the form of noise. The effects of noise may be severe. The most obvious effect is loss of hearing where levels of noise are very high and sustained. A less documented effect is general environmental stress from the physiological and psychological impacts of noise.Noise ge oral , , pA,.ibutes t ., less ,.famenity .-ad i:.,ability. The problems can come from general background sources, such as vehicular noise, -or periodic point source problems, such as partic lafly motor-e eles. Some point souree proble � r-eftiger-a4ien e"ipfnent in stores neaf residential areas, have also eeetiffed in the eity. imptilsive, high iffteasit-y noises whieh oeeuf only per-iodieally may also be iffita4iag in "iet subu neighbefhoods. Examples are airplanes, electronically amplified music, sirens, etc. Certain noise problems can be alleviated more easily than others. The noise of vehicular traffic, particularly on arterial streets is difficult to control. Point sources can be more easily regulated by requiring noise muffling equipment. Enforcement of noise standards can be a problem because of the training and skill involved in taking noise measurements. Cost of enforcement may be excessive if standards are too stringent. G& Noise Pollution Goal A. Preserve the quiet residential environment of the city by limiting increases in noise and reducing unnecessary noise where it now exists in accordance with the following policies: 118 Land Use 66. 5. A. 1-5 The city should partner with other jurisdictions in seeking to enforce qppropriate noise standards within the city. the P. GGA.A.6 Futwe street and w4er-ial pr-ejeets should be assessed for- neise , a -ad stfuetures such as berms, fences and other devices utilized wherever possi t o, uee the noise ets 66.7.A.2-7 Any ordinances adopted by the city should recognize the variety and quality of noise environments. &ieessive fegWations shetild not be imposed on areas of the city where higher noise levels are normal or necessary for essential aetivities and de not er-eate etwir-opmental problems. C.9.A.39 It is the policy of the city to minimize noise created by the railroad. Urban Growth Areas HH-. General. The accompanying Urban Growth Areas map shows the City's urban growth area, which encompasses unincorporated areas adjacent to the current city limits. In general, development within the urban growth area is of interest to the City because the area will be annexed to the City in the future and development in the area can be expected to have an impact on the demand for and delivery of City services. Urban Growth Area Goal A. Plan for the logical extension of services and development within the City's urban growth area. A.1 Encourage the annexation of the City's designated urban growth area into the city. A.2 To provide for orderly transitions, adopt comparable zoning and comprehensive plan designations for areas annexing into the City. R-.-2-. A.3 Adopted plans and policies for the urban growth area shall be consistent and compatible with the general comprehensive plan goals and policies for the City. Land Use 119 AI-7408 7. b . Planning Board Agenda Meeting Date: 01/14/2015 Discussion/Recommendation for Utilities Element of 2015 Comprehensive Plan update. Staff Lead/Author: Rob Chave, Planning Manager Department: Planning Initiated By: City Staff Other Information Subject/Purpose Discussion/Recommendation for Utilities Element of 2015 Comprehensive Plan update. Staff Recommendation Review and forward the draft to the City Council for review. The Board will hold a public hearing in the future. Previous Board Action The subject was introduced in December, 2014. Narrative The most recent edits to the Utilities Element of the comprehensive plan are attached. Attachment 1: Clean version of the Utilities Element (incorporating proposed changes). Attachment 2: Utilities Element showing edits from the existing adopted plan. For the Utilities Element, we are generally trying to update the element with accurate references to the various adopted utility plans while removing out-of-date or conflicting material. The Solid Waste section is new, however, since unlike the other utilities, there is not a separately adopted "solid waste plan". The same goes for the 'other" discussion at the end of the element. For ease of being able to follow any comments/questions, we suggest Board members work off the "Clean" version contained in Attachment 1. Attachments Attachment 1: Utilities Element, clean version Attachment 2: Utilities Element, showing proposed edits Utilities Element Potable Water Comprehensive Plan Goals and Policies The City of Edmonds has for many years acquired all of its finished water under a long-term wholesale purchase agreement with the Alderwood Water and Wastewater District (AWWD). AWWD, in turn, purchases its water from the City of Everett's regional water system. Everett's water source is the upper Sultan River and the water from that basin is collected in Spada Lake, approximately 30 miles east of downtown Everett. It flows from there to Chaplain Reservoir where it is treated and placed into one of four large transmission main lines that move it westward to the urbanized areas of Snohomish County. The City of Edmonds distributes this water on a retail basis to our customers and bills them for this service. Edmonds provides for operation, maintenance, capital improvements, and replacement of the "end -user" system that provides storage to cover peak usage periods and that further provides required fire protection volumes, and maintains the required the minimum and maximum allowable pressures. Goals, policies, and design criteria for operating this system are developed as part of the City's Comprehensive Water System Plan and assist the Utility in establishing priorities for both its operation and maintenance budgets as well as its six -year and 20-year Capital Improvement Plans. These goals, policies, and design criteria are found in Chapter 5, Policies and Design Criteria, in the 2010 Water System Plan under the following sections: water service, water supply, and facility policies and design criteria. The City's financial policies are described in Chapter 10 of the Water System Plan and include a recommended utility rate structure and an asset management -based replacement program designed to provide adequate on -going revenues to fully fund operations, maintenance, debt service and the recommended Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). The Edmonds City Council made a decision after the approval of the 2010 Water System Plan to adopt a rate structure that has been designed to fund from current rate revenues a very long range program of replacing its aging network of water mains rather than using debt financing to fund that program. As a result rates have been adjusted in each of three recent years to get closer to that goal. The plan is to examine the utility's financial capacity after the third year of this effort and make a decision whether or not to continue that rate adjustment for the remaining three years. Sanitary Sewer Comprehensive Plan Goals and Policies The City's policy for sewer service recognizes its function is not to determine allowable land uses within its service area but to respond to the capacity and service levels needs necessary to support the land uses approved in the City's land use planning processes. Development of the City's Comprehensive sewer plan is currently guided by policies adopted by City Council and by the Comprehensive Plans from adjacent agencies. These plans provide guidance to the City for management and operation of its sewer system and set the timing for expansions and upgrades to sewer infrastructure over the next thirty years. The Plan serves as a guide for policy development and decision making for the City. It also provides other agencies and the public with information regarding the City's plans for sewer system extensions within its service area. This approach allows the City to maintain its goal of providing high quality service to its customers while protecting 96 Utilities environmental quality, primarily the water quality of both Puget Sound and the coastal streams located in Edmonds. The Plan evaluates existing and future capacity, material types of the various pieces of infrastructure, pipe inspection assessments of the sewer system, anticipated future wastewater flow rates, and the structural condition of the sewer collection system. Future wastewater flow rates are estimated from existing flow data using population growth projected within the sewer service area. This growth rate is expected to continue to be modest at an average of 0.5% per year. An implementation plan is provided as part of the Sanitary Sewer Comprehensive Plan, including an estimated timeline for constructing selected projects that are in need of maintenance or upsizing. The financial analysis includes asset management of the system along with a utility rate structure to support the policies and goals set forth in the adopted Sanitary Sewer Comprehensive Plan. Similar to the Water Utility, as noted above, the Sewer Utility has embarked on a program to convert from debt -financing pipe replacements to one where the program can be funded directly from rate revenues. Storm and Surface Water Management Goals and Policies The City owns and operates an extensive system of drainage pipes and ditches to convey stormwater runoff to streams, lakes, and Puget Sound that are designed to prevent and minimize damage to private property, streets, and other infrastructure. Due to extensive alteration of the natural landscape in most areas of the City from development, the amount of stormwater that runs off the land in larger storm events is substantial, and runoff in all storm events carries a variety of pollutants that wash off of their source areas into receiving waters. The City is faced with the challenge of conveying stormwater runoff safely and cost-effectively while preventing or minimizing adverse high flow impacts (erosion, flooding, and sediment deposition), water quality degradation in lakes and streams receiving runoff, and degradation of aquatic habitat caused by high flows and water quality degradation. The NPDES Phase II permit has and will continue to have a significant impact on the workload and operational budget of the both the Engineering Division and the Storm Crews within the Public Works Department. Approximately 2/3 or more of the total stormwater operational budget is spent on permit -related compliance programs Goal and policies have been developed to guide the Utility to tackle the issues at hand. These goals and polices, once approved by the City Council, will replace those in the listed in the "Water Resources and Drainage Management" land use element of the City's current Comprehensive Plan (Edmonds 2009). These current goals and policies were first approved in 1985. Over the past 25 years, the practice of stormwater management has changed significantly. These new goals and policies reflect that change. Once this plan is approved by Council, it will be incorporated by reference in the Utility Element section of the City's Comprehensive Plan. Four goals have been developed by the City for this plan. Storm and Surface Water Management Goal A. Manage the storm and surface water system by combining preservation of natural systems and engineered solutions to: Provide for public safety; Minimize property damage; Utilities 97 Preserve and enhance critical areas; Promote sustainability; Comply with applicable local, state, and Federal regulations. Storm and Surface Water Management Goal B. To preserve, protect, and (where feasible) restore surface water resources to provide beneficial uses to humans, fish, and wildlife. Storm and Surface Water Management Goal C. Use public education to increase understanding of sustainability and other environmental values to help protect surface water resources. Storm and Surface Water Management Goal D. Provide adequate funding through an equitable stormwater utility rate structure and outside funding sources to support necessary programs (including asset management -based replacement program) that meet goals A, B, and C. To accomplish these goals, the City developed guiding policies for the flood protection, water quality, aquatic habitat, and stormwater utility funding program areas. More detailed goals and polcies are in the current adopted version of the Storm and Suface Water Comprehensive Management Plan. Solid Waste Solid waste collection and disposal is a sophisticated system that continues to evolve in using the most efficient and economical methods. Waste prevention and recycling have risen to become an elemental part of solid waste management planning. Curbside recycling, along with yard and food waste collection service, has become the norm as everyday activities for most residences, businesses, and schools. Engagement in these beneficial behaviors conserves resources, reduces litter, saves energy and contributes to greenhouse gas reduction efforts. The City is a signatory on the Snohomish County Solid Waste Management Comprehensive Plan and an active participant on the County's Solid Waste Advisory Committee. The County Plan provides a blueprint for which the City is able to provide education and outreach to all sectors in regards to proper disposal and recycling, and opportunities for collection and proper handling of several common unwanted materials. Solid Waste Goal A. The City of Edmonds shall continue to support and follow the directives outlined in the Snohomish County Solid Waste Management Comprehensive Plan, including: A.1 Work directly with County Solid Waste staff to implement recommendations that strengthen recycling, organics diversion, waste prevention, and product strewardship programs. A.2 Support the County's initiatives to work with the certified solid waste haulers to harmonize services and communication formats, and to expand their educational efforts, especially classroom workshops and presentations in the schools. Solid Waste Goal B. The City of Edmonds should strengthen local controls over collection of solid waste in accordance to the following policies: B.1 Investigate the requirement for city-wide mandatory garbage collection, combined with recycling services. 98 Utilities B.2 Update and revise the original Recycling Ordinance to reflect current and alternative collection methods and service scenarios. Solid Waste Goal C. The City of Edmonds shall continue to support and provide education and incentives for recycling and other waste diversion practices: C.1 Continue the Waste Prevention and Recycling Program which provides outreach and education to the community in all aspects of best solid waste management practices. C.2 Provide support for the establishment and expansion of public recycling opportunities, on an ongoing basis, and at all public events. C.3 Support product stewardship initiatives that establish collection and recycling infrastructure for materials that are toxic, hard -to -handle or under -recycled. CA Establish a policy that can assist in the reuse, recycling, and proper disposal of construction and demolition debris that is generated by development in the City. Solid Waste Goal D. Investigate policies and activities that will lead to development of a Zero Waste Strategy. D.1 Learn basic concepts as they apply to both waste management planning and materials management planning. D.2 Pursue waste prevention and reduction strategies. D.3 Establish a city-wide Buy Recycled policy. DA Eliminate or reduce use of hazardous materials in city operations. Other Utilities New utility systems and technologies are constantly developing or evolving. Rather than being reactive, the City should seek to plan for these new services as they develop. Other Utilities Goal A. Provide for public needs while protecting the character of the community and assuring consistency with other plan goals. A.1. New technologies should be planned and carefully researched prior to developing new regulations or reviewing siting proposals. Other Utilities Goal B. Public and private utility plans should be encouraged that identify long-range system needs and that are coordinated with the City's comprehensive plan. B.I. All utility projects should be coordinated to provide opportunities for projects to address more than one system improvement or maintenance need. Utilities 99 Other Utilities Goal C. Utility structures should be located whenever possible with similar types of structures to minimize impacts on surrounding neighborhoods. C.1. When such locations are not available, utility structures should be located or sited so that they are as unobtrusive as possible and are integrated with the design of their site and surrounding area. C.2. Free-standing structures should be discouraged when other siting opportunities are available. 100 Utilities Utilities Element Potable Water Comprehensive Plan Goals and Policies The City of Edmonds has for many years acquired all of its finished water under a lon -tg erm wholesale purchase agreement with the Alderwood Water and Wastewater District (AWWD). AWWD, in turn, purchases its water from the City of Everett's regional water system. Everett's water source is the upper Sultan River and the water from that basin is collected in Spada Lake, qpproximately 30 miles east of downtown Everett. It flows from there to Chaplain Reservoir where it is treated and placed into one of four large transmission main lines that move it westward to the urbanized areas of Snohomish County. The City of Edmonds distributes this water on a retail basis to our customers and bills them for this service. Edmonds provides for operation, maintenance, capital improvements, and replacement of the "end -user" system that provides storage to cover peak usage periods and that further provides required fire protection volumes, and maintains the required the minimum and maximum allowable pressures. Goals, policies, and design criteria for operatingthis his system are developed as part of the City's Comprehensive Water System Plan and assist the Utility in establishing priorities for both its operation and maintenance budgets as well as its six -year and 20 e�pital Improvement Plans. These goals, policies, and design criteria are found in Chapter 5, Policies and Design Criteria, in the 2010 Water System Plan under the following sections: water service, water supply, and facility policies and design criteria. The City's financial policies are described in Chapter 10 of the Water System Plan and include a recommended utility rate structure and an asset management -based replacement program designedprovide adequate on -going revenues to fully fund operations, maintenance, debt service and the recommended Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). [A21 The Edmonds City Council made a decision after the approval of the 2010 Water System Plan to adopt a rate structure that has been designed to fund from current rate revenues a very long range program of replacingits is aging network of water mains rather than using debt financing to fund that program. As a result rates have been adjusted in each of three recent years to get closer to that goal. The plan is to examine the utility's financial capacity after the third year of this effort and make a decision whether or not to continue that rate adjustment for the remainingthree hree years. Sanitary Sewer Comprehensive Plan Goals and Policies The City's policy for sewer service recognizes its function is not to determine allowable land uses within its service area but to respond to the capacity and service levels needs necessary to support the land uses approved in the City's land use planning processes. Development of the City Comprehensive sewer plan is currently guided by policies adopted by City Council and by the Comprehensive Plans from adjacent agencies. These plans provide guidance to the City for management and operation of its sewer system and set the timingfor or expansions and upgrades to sewer infrastructure over the next thirtyyears. The Plan serves as a guide for policy development and decision making for the City. It also provides other agencies and the public with information regarding the City's plans for sewer system extensions within its service area. This approach allows the City to maintain its goal of providinghigh igh quality service to its customers while protecting 138 Utilities environmental quality, primarily the water quality of both Puget Sound and the coastal streams located in Edmonds. The Plan evaluates existing and future capacity, material types of the various pieces of infrastructure, pipe inspection assessments of the sewer system, anticipated future wastewater flow rates, and the structural condition of the sewer collection system. Future wastewater flow rates are estimated from existing flow data using population growth projected within the sewer service area. This growth rate is expected to continue to be modest at an average of 0.5% per year. An implementation plan is provided as part of the Sanitary Sewer Comprehensive Plan, including an estimated timeline for constructing selected projects that are in need of maintenance or capsizing. The financial analysis includes asset management of the system along with a utility rate structure to support the policies and ,goals set forth in the adopted Sanitary Sewer Comprehensive Plan. Similar to the Water Utility, as noted above, the Sewer Utility has embarked on a programs convert from debt -financing pipe replacements to one where the program can be funded directly from rate revenues. Storm and Surface Water Management Goals and Policies 2 _ _ The City owns and operates an extensive system of drainage pipes and ditches to convey stormwater runoff to streams, lakes, and Puget Sound that are designed to prevent and minimize damage to private property, streets, and other infrastructure. Due to extensive alteration of the natural landscape in most areas of the City from development, the amount of stormwater that runs off the land in larger storm events is substantial, and runoff in all storm events carries a variety of pollutants that wash off of their source areas into receiving waters. The City is faced with the challenge of conveying stormwater runoff safely and cost-effectively while preventing or minimizing adverse high flow impacts (erosion, flooding, and sediment deposition), water quality degradation in lakes and streams receiving runoff, and degradation of aquatic habitat caused by high flows and water quality degradation. The NPDES Phase II permit has and will continue to have a significant impact on the workload and operational budget of the both the Engineering Division and the Storm Crews within the Public Works Department. Approximately 2/3 or more of the total stormwater operational budget is spent on permit -related compliance programs Goal and policies have been developed to guide the Utility to tackle the issues at hand. These goals and polices, once approved by the City Council, will replace those in the listed in the "Water Resources and Drainage Management" land use element of the City's current Comprehensive Plan (Edmonds 2009). These current goals and policies were first approved in 1985. Over the past 25 years, the practice of stormwater management has changed significantly. These new goals and policies reflect that change. Once this plan is approved by Council, it will be incorporated bX reference in the Utility Element section of the City's Comprehensive Plan. Four goals have been developed by the City for this plan. Storm and Surface Water Management Goal A. Manage the storm and surface watersystem by combining preservation of natural systems and engineered solutions to: • Provide for public safety - Utilities 139 • Minimize property damage; • Preserve and enhance critical • Promote sustainability; • Comply with applicable local, state, and Federal regulations. Storm and Surface Water Management Goal B. To preserve, protect, and (where feasible) restore surface water resources to provide beneficial uses to humans, fish, and wildlife. Storm and Surface Water Management Goal C. Use public education to increase understanding of sustainability and other environmental values to help protect surface water resources. Storm and Surface Water Management Goal A Provide adequate funding through an equitable stormwater utility rate structure and outside funding sources to support necessary programs (including asset management -based replacement program) that meet goals A, B, and C. To accomplish these goals, the City developed guiding policies for the flood protection, water quality, aquatic habitat, and stormwater utility fundingprogramareas. More detailed goals and polcies are in the current adopted version of the Storm and Suface Water Comprehensive Management Plan. 140 Utilities Solid Waste Solid waste collection and disposal is a sophisticated system that continues to evolve in using the most efficient and economical methods. Waste prevention and recycling have risen to become an elemental part of solid waste management planning. Curbside recycling, along with yard and food waste collection service, has become the norm as everyday activities for most residences, businesses, and schools. Engagement in these beneficial behaviors conserves resources, reduces litter, saves energy and contributes to greenhouse gas reduction efforts. The City is a si ng atory on the Snohomish County Solid Waste Management Comprehensive Plan and an active participant on the County's Solid Waste Advisory Committee. The County Plan provides a blueprint for which the City is able to provide education and outreach to all sectors in re . arm proper disposal and recycling and opportunities for collection and proper handling of several common unwanted materials. Litter-ing is unsightty as well as unsanitaFy. The "throwaway" philosophy is a waste of natural r-esour-ees and detmets from the natural beauty of our- suFr-oundings. Solid Waste Goal A. The City of Edmonds shall continue to support and follow the directives outlined in the Snohomish County Solid Waste Management Comprehensive Plan, including_ A.1 Work directly with County Solid Waste staff to implement recommendations that strengthen recycling, organics diversion, waste prevention, and product strewardship programs. A.2 Support the County's initiatives to work with the certified solid waste haulers to harmonize services and communication formats, and to expand their educational efforts, especially classroom workshops and presentations in the schools. Solid Waste Goal B. The City of Edmonds should strengthen local controls over collection of solid waste in accordance to the following policies: B.1 Investigate the requirement for city-wide mandatory garbage collection, combined with recycling services. Utilities 141 B.2 Update and revise the original Recycling Ordinance to reflect current and alternative collection methods and service scenarios. Solid Waste Goal C. The City of Edmonds shall continue to support and provide education and incentives for recycling and other waste diversion practices: C.1 Continue the Waste Prevention and Recycling Program which provides outreach and education to the community in all aspects of best solid waste management practices. C.2 Provide support for the establishment and expansion of public recycling opportunities, on an ongoing basis, and at all public events. C.3 Support product stewardship initiatives that establish collection and rec, cling infrastructure for materials that are toxic, hard -to -handle or under -recycled. CA Establish a policy that can assist in the reuse, recycling and proper disposal of construction and demolition debris that is generated by development in the City. Solid Waste Goal D. Investigate policies and activities that will lead to development of a Zero Waste Strategy. D.1 Learn basic concepts as they pply to both waste management planning and materials management planning. D.2 Pursue waste prevention and reduction strategies. D.3 Establish a city-wide Buy Recycledpolicy. DA Eliminate or reduce use of hazardous materials in city operations. Other Utilities 142 Utilities separa ion of wastes at hone. Those who use fewer ears should esfi. D.3. Edmonds should eendtiet a eity wide e"eational eampaign on solid waste telling eitizeas & Goal. -Edmonds should enfor-ee litter- eoatFel a -ad eneour-age eaffmfflflity litter- piek+Ts an prevention pfegr-ams. F. 1. Gonfii+aetts studies she -aid be made of proposals fof feeyeling solid waste. Edmonds should encoufage the use of retumable bottles and eans and reusable shopping bags to save - andr-o 0 F.3.Mar-kets for reeyeled materials afe fluetuating and their stabilization should be eneoufaged. F.5.Demonstfa4ion programs should be ttsed to detefmifie aeeeptable methods of home sepafation of wastes, eolleetion and reeyeling. Other- U44ities New utility systems and technologies are constantly developing or evolving. Rather than being reactive, the City should seek to plan for these new services as they develop. Other Utilities Goal A. The geal is Provide for public needs while protecting the character of the community and assuring consistency with other plan goals. A-.4-. A.1. New technologies should be planned and carefully researched prior to developing new regulations or reviewing siting proposals. @GHSiSt@ff@y with Gth@r- Plan goats. Other Utilities Goal B. Public and private utility plans should be encouraged that identify long- range system needs and that are coordinated with the City's comprehensive plan. Az? B.1. All utility projects should be coordinated to provide opportunities for projects to address more than one system improvement or maintenance need. Other Utilities Goal C. Utility structures should be located whenever possible with similar types of structures to minimize impacts on surrounding neighborhoods. Utilities 143 C.1. When such locations are not available, utility structures should be located or sited so that they are as unobtrusive as possible and are integrated with the design of their site and surrounding area. C.2. Free-standing structures should be discouraged when other siting opportunities are available. 144 Utilities AI-7411 Planning Board Agenda Meeting Date: 01/14/2015 Edmonds Parks Recreation & Cultural Services Planning Board Report January 2015 Staff Lead/Author: Carrie Hite, Director Department: Initiated By: Planning Information Subject/Purpose Edmonds Parks Recreation & Cultural Services Planning Board Report January 2015 Staff Recommendation Staff recommends Planning Board review the attached report. Previous Board Action N/A Narrative Report is attached. Attachments Parks & Rec Report W Edmonds Parks Recreation & Cultural Services { Planning Board Report January 2015 Submitted by Carrie Hite, Director Five Corners Roundabout Artwork Artwork by CJ Rench was selected in late 2013 in a public process facilitated through the Arts Commission and fabricated and installed in 2014. The art element was funded through the Percent for Art program. The sculpture, titled Drawn to the Water — Connected by Community, references the connection between Five Corners and downtown and serves as a significant gateway to the downtown. The name is inlaid in the sidewalk edge on the east side. 4t" Avenue Cultural Corridor The Arts Commission and a community advisory group prepared a plan for interim or temporary art projects on the corridor. The project was presented to City Council in September 2014 and the Arts Commission is currently working on the design phase. Funding is through public private partnerships. Edmonds Downtown Cultural Heritaee Tour The project, consisting of 12 unique interpretive signs by artist Judith Caldwell, was installed and dedicated in July 2014. Called Stages of History, the project website includes additional information on downtown history which can be added to in the future (www.edmondsstagesofhistory.com). Project partners included the Edmonds Arts Commission, Historic Preservation Commission, Edmonds Arts Festival Foundation, Edmonds Center for the Arts, Edmonds Chamber of Commerce, Edmonds Community College, Edmonds Historical Museum, and the Hubbard Family Foundation. The projected was funded in part by a Preserve America grant. SR 99 International District Enhancements Project The project was completed and dedicated in late January 2014. Budget total = $662,000, funded through Federal Highway Enhancements grants. The Arts Manager continues to be involved in planning for potential art elements for future projects on SR 99. Flower Basket Poles A total of 22 poles with unique art elements have been installed in downtown Edmonds and a walking map is available on the website. Nine have been commemorated through the City program similar to the bench commemoration program. Five more new artwork poles are scheduled to replace older poles in 2015. Edmonds Marsh/Marina Beach Master Plan The City is continuing to contract with Earthcorps (formerly the work of People for Puget Sound) to project manage the phases of the Edmonds Marsh rehabilitation efforts. In addition a very active Friends of the Edmonds Marsh group made up of citizens and citizen scientists has been working with the Port, the City, Earthcorps, and other entities to implement the plan "to expand and restore functional estuarine habitat within Edmonds Marsh and protect the remaining wildlife by engaging the community to preserve, steward, and enjoy our most natural asset". A major goal of this effort is daylighting Willow Creek and this gained traction with the installation of a box culvert at Marina Beach Park with the double tracking project. We recently were awarded another SRFB grant for $157,000 to complete 60% design and begin the permitting work. In addition, we have $75,000 in our CIP to complete the Marina Beach Master Plan with the community this year, incorporating the outfall of Willow Creek. Val Stewart will serve on the Project Advisory Committee for this, along with other citizens. Yost Pool We completed the replacement of the the boiler at Yost pool this year. We also entered into an operational agreement with the YMCA for the summer. Both of these efforts helped to decrease the subsidy, and end the season in a financially stable position. This next year we are currently negotiating with the YMCA for a similar agreement. We will also be replacing the spa this spring. City Park The City Park playground was installed in July, with a large community build project. We had over 100 volunteers that contributed to this. We have also had success with a new architect firm in redesign of the spray pad. We have the building permit and will be going to bid in the next month. We will be installing a water recirculation system. As part of the permit project, we were required to perform some wetland mitigation around the Marsh area north of the park. We worked with the Student Conservation Association to complete this over the summer. We are hopeful to be under construction from March —June, opening the spray pad in June, 2015. Park Impact Fees In March 2012, City Council unanimously voted to fund efforts to study the feasibility of assessing Park Impact Fees in Edmonds. This study was completed, and the Council adopted the Park Impact Fees in August 2013, to be effective October 1, 2013, and phased in over two years. The final phasing was complete in October 2014. We have projected revenues through 2015 to be at $500,000. Dayton Street Plaza This project is on the schedule to begin in the next few weeks. The plaza design and bid documents are complete. In 2012, we were unable to determine if REET funding would be available for completion of this project. We had two other large projects in various phases of completion, and needed to retain capacity for completion of those projects. We have since transferred the construction allocation to our project construction fund, and will go to bid in 2015 for completion of the Dayton Street Plaza. Private grant funds for the project total $32,500, and REET funds total $135,500. Former Woodwav Hieh School Development We were recently successful in receiving a $2.5M grant from Verdant for this project. We now have the complete funding for the first phase fund development of $4.2M. The District is currently working with the City on the design, and two full size multi use turf fields will be constructed this summer. We are also working on a City/School partnership agreement for maintenance and use of the fields. Wayfinding Signage Parks and Public Works continue working to install signage created in 2013. Museum Plaza Staff participated in preliminary design discussions for the Museum project to develop a community plaza in front of the Museum entry. Community Cultural Plan The Arts Commission has taken a lead in organizing meetings for work groups in the five key implementation areas: Space for Art, Communication, Programs and Events, Strong Arts Sector, and Arts Education. This groundwork in the Communication area led into the Economic Development Department creation of a new inclusive website calendar for arts, culture and events. Worked with Economic Development to create tourism video. Cemetery: We will be researching and planning for a cemetery mapping project. Currently, the Edmonds Memorial Cemetery is not marked or mapped. This has created some issues and reliance on institutional memory. This is an effort to bring the Cemetery up to standard so that it can be operated efficiently. In addition, we will be installing a new barrier above the columbarium. This project was reprioritized to 2016. Communitv Garden The City recently worked with a Westgate church to establish a community garden which is open to all. The garden opened in May of 2014. We also have added this into the scope of work at the former Woodway Fields to establish a second garden area. 3 Waterfront parcel acquisition We were recently awarded $500,000 from Snohomish County Conservation Futures for acquisition of a waterfront parcel located at Beach Place. The City is working with Forterra to secure this property. Civic Stadium: The City has been working with the School District on the purchase and sale of the stadium to the City. This past year, the City conducted an appraisal of the property and submitted an RCO grant for acquisition funds for the Civic stadium. We will not know about the funds until May. The School District is now performing an appraisal. The goal is to complete a transaction this year. Fishing Pier: The City is working with the Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife to secure funds to rehabilitate the Fishing Pier. The Pier needs significant work underneath to reconstruct and reinforce deteriorating infrastructure. We will be securing funds this year and are planning on construction in 2016. Student Conservation Association: The City has collaborated with the Student Conservation Association to bring a youth work/education program to the City to help in the parks over the summer. Anderson Center Amphitheatre: We will be replacing the roof on the Amphitheatre this year, as it is in disrepair. Veteran's Plaza: Based on a recommendation from the Planning Board, the City Council charged a community group with developing a Veteran's plaza. This plaza will be located outside the public safety building. This group has been working with the City and will be presenting their preferred concept design to the Council on January 20t". There will also be a public hearing on this same date. Recreation: The 2014 program fees came in 2.5% higher than projected which shows an improvement in the economy. Special events for 2014 included Outdoor Movies, Sand Sculpting Contest, Health & Fitness Expo, Edmonds Street Scramble, Puget Sound Bird Fest, Watershed Fun Fair, Moonlight Beach Adventure, Starlight Beach Walk and a Spring Beach Cleanup and Low -tide Walk. The Ranger -Naturalists provided 272 marine education programs, 94 Discover the Forest programs, 20 Nature Discovery in the Classroom programs and a variety of camps. Rangers patrolled the waterfront 85 days in 2014. The Visitor Station was open Saturdays and Sundays, Noon-5 pm, Memorial Day through Labor Day weekend, and some weekday hours. 23 Volunteer Beach Docents spent a total of 226 hours at the Visitor Station. The log recorded 4,885 visitors over the 71 days that the station was open. Other items for discussion in the next year: Metropolitan Park District Park Naming Policy 5 AI-7410 9 Planning Board Agenda • Meeting Date: 01/14/2015 Department: Planning Initiated By: Information Subject/Purpose Administrative Reports: Review Extended Agenda Staff Recommendation Previous Board Action Narrative