Loading...
2016-10-12 Planning Board Packeto Agenda Edmonds Planning Board snl. ynyo COUNCIL CHAMBERS 250 5TH AVE NORTH, EDMONDS, WA 98020 OCTOBER 12, 2016, 7:00 PM 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. Approval of Draft Minutes: September 28, 2016 3. ANNOUNCEMENT OF AGENDA 4. AUDIENCE COMMENTS 5. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS A. Director Report 6. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Public Hearing on the Proposed 2017-2022 Capital Facilities Plan/Capital Improvements Program 7. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 8. NEW BUSINESS A. 2016 Comprehensive Plan Amendments 9. PLANNING BOARD EXTENDED AGENDA A. Planning Board Extended Agenda 10. PLANNING BOARD CHAIR COMMENTS 11. PLANNING BOARD MEMBER COMMENTS 12. ADJOURNMENT Edmonds Planning Board Agenda October 12, 2016 Page 1 2.A Planning Board Agenda Item Meeting Date: 10/12/2016 Approval of Draft Minutes: September 28, 2016 Staff Lead: N/A Department: Planning Division Prepared By: Diane Cunningham Background/History N/A Staff Recommendation Review and approve the draft minutes Narrative Draft minutes are attached. Attachments: PB160928d Packet Pg. 2 2.A.a CITY OF EDMONDS PLANNING BOARD MINUTES September 28, 2016 Chair Lovell called the meeting of the Edmonds Planning Board to order at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, Public Safety Complex, 250 — 5 b Avenue North. BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT Philip Lovell, Chair Carreen Rubenkonig, Vice Chair Matthew Cheung Alicia Crank Nathan Monroe Valerie Stewart BOARD MEMBERS ABSENT Todd Cloutier (excused) Daniel Robles (excused) READING/APPROVAL OF MINUTES STAFF PRESENT Rob Chave, Planning Division Manager Rob English, City Engineer Carrie Hite, Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services Director Jerry Bevington, Video Recorder Karin Noyes, Recorder BOARD MEMBER STEWART MOVED THAT THE MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 14, 2016 BE APPROVED AS CORRECTED. BOARD MEMBER MONROE SECONDED THE MOTION, WHICH CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. ANNOUNCEMENT OF AGENDA The agenda was accepted as presented. AUDIENCE COMMENTS There was no one in the audience. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR REPORT TO PLANNING BOARD Chair Lovell referred to Page 3, which contains a brief update on the Waterfront Access Study. He clarified that a second public meeting was recently held, and his understanding is that the Task Force will be making a recommendation to the City Council via Mayor Earling sometime in October. PRESENTATION OF THE PROPOSED 2017-2022 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN (CFP) AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP) Mr. English started his presentation by providing a diagram to illustrate the components of the CIP and CFP, particularly noting differences between the two documents and where they overlap. He explained that both plans identify the six -year Packet Pg. 3 capital projects with funding sources, but the CIP also identifies six -year maintenance projects with funding sources and the CFP identifies long-range (20 year) capital project needs. The CFP is divided into three project sections: General (parks, buildings and regional projects), Transportation (safety/capacity and pedestrian bicycle projects), and Utilities. The CIP is organized based on the City's financial funds and provides a description of each of the capital projects identified for the six - year period. He summarized that the CIP is a budgeting tool that includes capital and maintenance projects, linking those projects to the various City funds and revenues, and the CFP is intended to identify longer -term capital needs (not maintenance) and be tied to City level -of -service standards. The CFP is also required to be consistent with other elements of the Comprehensive Plan, (i.e. transportation, parks, etc.), and there are restrictions on how often a CFP can be amended. There are no such restrictions tied to the CIP. He reviewed each of the funds as follows: • Fund 112 — Transportation. This fund is managed by the Public Works Department. • Fund 116 — Building Maintenance. This fund is also managed by the Public Works Department. • Fund 125 — Capital Projects. This fund is managed by the Parks and Recreation and Public Works Departments. Money for this fund comes from the Real Estate Excise Tax (REET), and the dollars are split between the two departments. • Fund 126 — Special Capital/Park Acquisition. This fund is supported by REET funds and is managed by the Parks and Recreation Department. • Fund 129 — Special Projects. This fund is currently idle and was last used for the Highway 99 International District Lighting Project that was completed a few years ago. Any new capital project would program into this fund. • Fund 132 — Parks Construction (Grant Funding). This fund is managed by the Parks and Recreation Department. • Fund 421— Water Projects. This fund is managed by the Public Works Department. • Fund 422 — Storm Projects. This fund is also managed by the Public Works Department. • Fund 423 — Waste Water Treatment Plant. This fund is managed by the Public Works Department. Next, Mr. English recapped some of the larger projects that have been completed or the City is working towards completion of in 2016: • The 228th Street Corridor Improvement Project started in May of 2015 and reached substantial completion in March of 2016. The project included a new signalized intersection that connects 228th Street east to west across Highway 99 and into Mountlake Terrace, providing a new east/west connection to Interstate 5. • Safety improvements were completed with a median down Highway 99 to eliminate the left turns from south bound Highway 99 to 76th Avenue West. This should help reduce accidents and provide safety turning movements. • A sidewalk improvement project on 2381h Street between 100'h and 104th Streets was completed via a Safe Routes to Schools Grant. Stormwater funds were used to improve drainage, including bio-retention rain gardens in key locations. The street was also overlaid using funds from the Pavement Restoration Program. • Sewer mains were replaced on Walnut Street, and the project also included new pavement via the Pavement Restoration Program. • On September 27th, the City Council approved a contract for a project on the south side of 236th Street between SR-104 and Madrona School. The project will include a new sidewalk, with a five-foot path to cross over to school, and curbs and gutters will also be installed. The pavement is in poor condition, so the roadway will be rebuilt. The project will include stormwater and water main work, as well. The City is coordinating with the School District's plan to rebuild the school starting in 2017 to provide a sidewalk leading into the school property. • As part of the Pavement Preservation Program, 9.6 lane miles of roadway were repaved, and pedestrian curb ramp upgrades were completed. • REET dollars (125 and 126 Funds) were used to fund the 2016 Pavement Preservation Program, single cabinet upgrades, traffic calming program, curb ramp upgrades, and an ADA transition plan update. Planning Board Minutes September 28, 2016 Page 2 Packet Pg. 4 2.A.a Mr. English reviewed the projects that will be funded in 2017 via the 112 Fund as follows: • The 76th Avenue West and 212th Street Intersection Improvement Project was bid out in May. However, given the bidding climate, the bids came in much higher than the engineer's estimate. Only two bids were received and both were high. The City elected to reject both bids and rebid the project during the winter months. That means the project would likely start in the spring of 2017. In the meantime, the City has applied for additional grant funding from the Transportation Improvement Board, but won't know the outcome of the application until November. This large project will add capacity to the intersection and underground utilities. Chair Lovell pointed out that the project is identified in the CIP as being unfunded at this time. Mr. English said the City has secured federal funding for the project, and has applied for additional grant funding, as well. Chair Lovell referred to the spreadsheet on Page 9 and said it is unclear how much grant funding has been secured in 2016 and how much needs to be secured in 2017. Mr. English agreed to revisit the numbers and update them accordingly. He suggested that perhaps the labels needed to be corrected to more clearly reflect the intent. He said that in addition to grant funding for the project, additional funding will come from the water and storm utility funds, since infrastructure needs to be replaced in the intersection prior to pavement work being done. • Citywide bicycle improvements will continue in 2017. For example, a striping project will occur on 76th Avenue West to add bicycle lanes and change a four -lane facility into a 3-lane facility. This project will likely be bid in conjunction with the intersection improvements to get some economy. • The 238th Street Walkway Project from SR-104 to SR-99 will also be completed in 2017. The City received a grant from the State Transportation Improvement Board and design work has been started. • The City received federal funding to move forward with an overlay of 84`h Avenue from 200th Street to 212th Street during the summer of 2017. • REET dollars will be used to install Trackside Warning Systems at Main and Dayton Streets to reduce the sound footprint that the current train horns have. The warning systems will be permanently installed at the intersections, and the horns will blow whenever a train is passing through Edmonds in either direction. The noise from the horns will be more focused at the intersections so there will be less impact to surrounding properties. Mr. English summarized that the Water Utility Fund (421) supported the replacement of 4,850 feet of water main in 2016, and 3,400 feet of street affected by waterline replacements was overlaid. In 2017 it is anticipated that 7,300 feet of water main will be replaced and 8,200 feet of street affected by waterline replacement will be overlaid. Mr. English also reviewed that the Stormwater Utility Fund (422) supported the 238th Street drainage improvements that were completed in 2016, as well as the new pipe and infiltration gallery in southwest Edmonds between 106`h and 105th Street. The 2017 projects include the Seaview infiltration project, further design of the Willow Creek/Edmonds Marsh project, an update of the Stormwater Comprehensive Plan, and installation of the Dayton Street Pump Station. He explained that the Seaview project is funded via a grant and will help reduce the number of surges from stormwater flowing into Perrinville Creek. The Willow Creek/Edmonds Marsh project is ongoing, and it is anticipated that final design work and permitting can move forward in 2017. He explained that during heavy rain events and high tide, the intersection at Dayton Street and SR- 104 floods. Given its proximity to the marsh, Willow Creek, the outfall, and the tide, the solution is complicated. As proposed, a lift station will be installed off of Dayton Street in the fishing pier parking lot as a first step to solve the flooding problems at the intersection. Lastly, Mr. English reviewed that in 2016 the Sewer Utility Fund (423) supported the replacement of 2,000 feet of sewer main and the rehabilitation of 6,400 feet of sewer main using the cured -in -place process (CIPP). In addition, it funded 1,075 of pavement overlay on streets affected by the sewer main replacement projects. It is anticipated that 2,900 feet of sewer main will be replaced in 2017, with 3,000 feet of CIPP rehabilitation and pavement overlay on 8,600 feet of street affected by sewer main replacement. A large wastewater treatment project is in process near the ferry holding lanes where the secondary clarifier is being replaced. The project should be completed in October. Planning Board Minutes September 28, 2016 Page 3 Packet Pg. 5 2.A.a Ms. Hite reviewed the 2016 projects that were completed by the Parks and Recreation Department in 2016 as follows: • The City acquired the Civic Field property and is currently in the process of completing a master plan for its redevelopment. The consultant has provided two updates to the Planning Board, and continued discussion and a public hearing is scheduled for November 9th. The community has been very engaged in the process. • The spray park at City Park was opened in the spring and had a very successful summer. However, they have heard some concern from neighbors about the increased noise level associated with the new facility. They are currently looking at ways to do remediation in the mechanical room. Board Member Cheung asked how the City cleans the water that is used at the spray pad. Ms. Hite answered that the City uses a circulating system. Water moves through a filtration system where it is filtered and reused on the pad. The water is tested often to ensure there is a good balance, and this summer there were no situation in which the spray pad had to be closed down. • The Dayton Street Plaza is nearly completed, and they are currently in the last stages of landscaping. • The temporary art installation (Luminous Forest) on 4t' Avenue was completed, and wayfinding signs were installed throughout the City. • The Marina Beach Park Master Plan was completed in early 2016. Updates to the plan were needed to accommodate the Willow Creek improvements, which is a joint project with the Parks and Recreation Department and Utilities Division to control stormwater runoff and rehabilitate the marsh. • The Fishing Pier Rehabilitation Project is nearing completion, and it expected to open with a ribbon -cutting ceremony on November 15tn • The Downtown Public Restroom Project is currently under construction near City Hall. That means that the project can be removed from the 2017 CFP because it will be completed in 2016. • The Yost Spa Project is currently in progress. However, the project had to be redesigned in order to meet current code requirements. • The Frances Anderson Center Stage Replacement Project is currently in progress, and the City Council recently approved a contract for the project to begin in the new few weeks. • The Veteran's Project is in progress, as well. The City received two bids that were higher than the engineer's estimate. They are working with the Veteran's Plaza Committee to open the capital campaign to obtain more funding. They are also trying to structure a process that is more competitive and allows contractors a more flexible time period to complete the project. The anticipated opening date is Memorial Day 2017. • The playground equipment at Marina Beach Park has been replaced, and they are currently working to replace the equipment at the Meadowdale Preschool playground using the existing footprint. However, they recently learned that the footprint was actually located within the setback area. This requires that the City obtain a variance from the Hearing Examiner before the new equipment can be installed. Next, Ms. Hite reviewed the proposed 2017 projects as follows: • The Edmonds Marsh and Daylighting of Willow Creek Project is ongoing. The City has obtained grant funding to continue the feasibility study, and they have applied for other competitive grants, as well. Because the Washington State Recreation and Conservation Office had offered grants to projects that did not go into completion in 2014, they are now offering the funding to the City of Edmonds outside of the regular cycle to use for the Willow Creek Project. Planning Board Minutes September 28, 2016 Page 4 Packet Pg. 6 • Parklet Projects will move forward in 2017, as will the Outdoor Fitness Zone Project. The City received a grant of $50,000 and applied for another grant that was not received. Currently, there is a grant application pending with the Verdant Commission. If the grant funding is received, the City can go forward with the three fitness zones. If not, they will have to consider other options. • Gateway replacement is ongoing and in process. • The City is partnering with the City of Lynnwood to rehabilitate the Meadowdale Playfields. • The City's storage building burned down earlier in the year, and the City has received reimbursement from its insurance company. Considering the storage needs of both the Facilities and Parks and Recreation Departments, staff is proposing that the building be rebuilt to a size that is nearly 2.5 times larger but in the same location. • There is funding left from the state grant that was used to acquire Civic Field, and the City has received permission from the State to use the funds to demolish the grandstands. The stadium was not included in any of the design alternatives that were considered for the Civic Field Master Plan, and it would be great to take advantage of the grant money to do this work. • Funding was set aside in the 2016 CIP for a community garden, but the City was unable to find a suitable location. Staff has been in touch with Snohomish County regarding the possibility of partnering to create a community garden in a park in Esperance. • The bids received for the Veteran's Plaza were rejected, and the City will go out to bid again soon. They expect to break ground and open the plaza in May of 2017. • The Senior Center is undertaking a capital program to redevelop the site into a Waterfront Center, and the City has discussed the opportunity to redevelop the waterfront at the same time. This will involve removing the existing creosote pilings, reconfiguring the park, add a bioswale and raingardens to filter runoff from the parking lot before it goes into the Sound, a hand boat launch, more access to the beach, and a picnic area with a natural access to the senior center. In addition, the City is currently in discussions with the owners of the Ebb Tide Condominiums to complete the waterfront walkway in front of their building within the City's 10-foot easement. The City is working with the same designer that is doing the landscaping around the proposed Waterfront Center. The City has applied for two $50,000 grants, and the project has scored high on both. The City has also set aside park impact fee dollars for the project. Ms. Hite said staff is recommending that the Cultural Arts Facilities Needs Study be deleted from the CFP. If it is determined that the City needs a facility at some point in the future, it can be added back into the CFP. Also, the Downtown Restroom Project should be completed by the end of the year, so he can be removed from the 2017 CFP. Chair Lovell asked if the Edmonds Waterfront Analysis relates to the work being done by the Railroad Crossing Task Force. Ms. Hite answered affirmatively. Chair Lovell asked why no funding has been set aside for this project in the next four years. Mr. English said there is still momentum to move a crossing project forward, and the task force will continue its work. The Mayor is currently working on the 2017 budget, which will be presented to the City Council in October. They will know more about funding after the draft budget has been released. In addition, the City has applied for some transportation grants to continue the work. At this point, it is too early to know if there will be funding for the project, and it was included in the CFP as a placeholder. Mr. English summarized that staff begins working on the CIP and CFP updates in July, and a preliminary draft is typically presented to the Planning Board in September. A public hearing on the CIP and CFP is scheduled for October 12th, after which the Board will forward a recommendation to the City Council. Updated documents will be provided at the hearing, including more detailed information to outline the differences between 2016 and 2017. Staff is scheduled to make an initial presentation to the City Council on October 18th, with a public hearing on November 1st. Using the Board's input and public comments, the City Council will discuss the draft documents and make revisions. It is anticipated that final adoption will Planning Board Minutes September 28, 2016 Page 5 Packet Pg. 7 occur in November or December. Once adopted, the CFP will be included as part of the next batch of Comprehensive Plan Amendments. Board Member Monroe requested more information about the Citywide Capital Renewal Program, which is listed on Page 11 of the CIP. Ms. Hite said this program is managed by the Facilities Division. She explained that, in years past, the program has had minimal funding, and many infrastructure renewal projects have been deferred. This year, Mayor Earling is proposing that a lump sum be set aside for doing renewal of the City's capital assets. The Capital Facilities Manager has prepared a list of needs, and the projects will be funded by the $1.5 million set aside for the Capital Renewal Program. The intent is to chip away at the projects each year. For example, there are numerous needs at the Frances Anderson Center that have been deferred from previous years. Board Member Stewart said she is excited to see the projects that have been accomplished during the year, as well as projects that will happen going forward. She asked if staff could provide the Board and City Council with a copy of the list of projects associated with the Capital Renewal Project. Ms. Hite agreed to provide the list as an attachment for the public hearing. Board Member Stewart asked if City staff works to coordinate infrastructure projects so they can be done simultaneously. For example, are sewer and water main replacements coordinated so they are completed before a street is overlaid. Mr. English answered affirmatively. Once a significant project has been identified, City staff inspects the condition of other elements, such as water and sewer mains. If needed, the pro�ects can be done simultaneously. For example, he referred to the Dayton Street Project that took place between 3rd and 9 Avenues, which was initiated as a stormwater improvement. After doing a comprehensive review of the other utilities, the project was expanded to include water and sewer main improvements, as well. The project at the 212`h Street intersection is another example of a combined project. It initially started as a transportation capacity project, but after evaluating the condition of the utilities, replacement of the sewer and stormwater mains were incorporated into the project. Board Member Stewart reviewed that frontage improvements, including sidewalks, are required for any new development in the City. She voiced concern that, sometimes the improvements that are made are torn up just a few years later to accommodate a City improvement project. She asked if it is possible for City staff to help developers anticipate the future improvements and perhaps postpone or defer the frontage improvements until the City's larger project moves forward. Mr. English said City staff has more control when it comes to coordinating City projects, but it is more difficult for private development. A good example is the 200th Street Overlay Project. A developer found out about the project via the notification process and the City worked with the developer to get the connections made to the City's systems before the overlay project moved forward. He said staff tries to coordinate city projects and development proposals through the building permit application. Ideally, the City can hold off on a project to allow a developer to get his/her work done, but he acknowledged that is not always the case. Board Member Stewart summarized that the City should do its part to help property owners by allowing them to postpone the improvements until they can be coordinated with larger, planned City proj ects. Board Member Stewart asked if Planning Board Members would have an opportunity to provide feedback relative to the fitness stations that are proposed for City parks. Ms. Hite answered that she would love to have feedback from the Board as the project moves forward. Board Member Stewart asked if funding for open space acquisition is included in the CIP. Ms. Hite answered that she programs $200,000 into each year's budget for open space acquisition. She agreed it is important to include this in the yearly discussions, and she will add it to her presentation for the public hearing. She said it would be helpful to have feedback from the Board as to whether they support rolling this funding over from year-to-year until an opportunity comes up. Board Member Stewart observed that, as land continues to be developed, the City should remain open to opportunities to acquire open space. Once land is developed, the opportunity will be lost. Board Member Cheung asked how the City prioritizes the capital improvement projects. Mr. English explained that, from a pavement preservation standpoint, staff evaluates the condition of the pavement each year and places a rating on the streets. They also try to coordinate the work with needed utility replacement projects. For example, a street overlay may be postponed if the City knows that a water or sewer main project will be needed in the near future so that the two projects can Planning Board Minutes September 28, 2016 Page 6 Packet Pg. 8 2.A.a be coordinated and completed at the same time. As far as capital project prioritization, there is very limited funding, and the City typically uses grant opportunities as a way to prioritize these projects. First, they look at the prioritized list of projects in the 2015 Transportation Improvement Plan. As grant opportunities come up, staff selects the most competitive projects that fit the particular grant requirements. Typically, the transportation capital infrastructure budget is very small (between $140,000 and $150,000). Additional funding for capital projects comes from grants and from traffic impact fees. On the other hand, Mayor Earling has made pavement preservation a priority for the past few years. Board Member Cheung asked how citizens can recommend transportation improvement projects for inclusion in the Transportation Improvement Plan. Mr. English explained that, from a planning standpoint, staff uses the list that is included in the Transportation Improvement Plan, which an adopted element of the Comprehensive Plan. Adoption of the Transportation Improvement Plan included an extensive public process that allowed the public to identify projects they felt were most important. During the most recent update, a sidewalk committee was formed to evaluate each street and identify where sidewalks are needed. Citizens can contact the Public Works or Engineering Department to provide feedback on potential projects, and staff will evaluate the situation to determine what the appropriate solution might be. Vice Chair Rubenkonig added that the Police Department also takes note of situations were a high number of accidents are occurring. Board Member Crank said she appreciates the work that was done at the intersection of 228th Street and Highway 99. However, some people are questioning the design of the median, which appears to have benches where people can sit. Mr. English advised that the design was intended to provide relief to the median's appearance. There are a lot of design options to choose from, but it was felt that the concrete or grass median was not very aesthetically pleasing for this location. Given the speed of traffic along the corridor, the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) also felt that the taller median was needed for safety reasons. The center section of the median has a colored concrete stamp that was intended to provide an aesthetic element to the median as opposed to a concrete covered center. Board Member Crank referred to the new flashing traffic signal that was installed at Edmonds Way and 232nd Street. She asked if the area is currently being monitored and if there has been an uptick in traffic volumes as a result of the new marijuana business and proposed new residential development. Mr. English agreed to looking into the issue and provide a better answer about traffic volumes at the public hearing. He recalled that the SR-104 Corridor Analysis that was recently completed looked at the entire corridor through Edmonds. It identified several recommendations for capital improvement projects to make the corridor more pedestrian friendly and safe. Board Member Crank asked if there have been any reports of traffic accidents associated with the newly installed Luminous Forest. Ms. Hite advised that the Police Department had some concerns when the it was first installed, and the artist advised that after the installation has been on for one month, the surface will become scratched and dim. She hasn't heard of any accidents on 4th Avenue to date. Board Member Crank said she would love to see the community garden concept come to fruition. It would be a very attractive amenity for apartment dwellers. Ms. Hite agreed, but explained that the City has had a difficult time finding an appropriate location. It was originally planned for the south side of the Old Woodway High School site, but because of controversy surrounding the athletic fields, staff decided against pursuing that location. She expressed her belief that the park in Esperance would be good location for a community garden, and she will continue to work with Snohomish County to make that happen. Vice Chair Rubenkonig said she has had a long-standing concern about the intersection at 76th Avenue and 212th Street for a number of years. The last time the CIP was before the Board, she requested that the City consider placing an "all walk" crossing at this intersection. She lives in the area and is at the intersection often. It seems like an all walk would make it faster for the students to get across the road. She asked if this could be included in the 2016 CIP. Mr. English said the concept has been discussed by staff and it comes down to finding a balance between pedestrian safety and getting vehicles through the intersection. He agreed to talk to the Transportation Engineer to get more information about the concept and then report back to the Board at their next meeting. Chair Lovell observed that this is the first time that neither the CIP nor CFP identifies funding for the Edmonds Crossing Project. He assumes that staff will provide an explanation for this change and indicate whether the funds that were previously allocated would be used elsewhere. Mr. English said there have been no changes associated with the Edmonds Planning Board Minutes September 28, 2016 Page 7 Packet Pg. 9 2.A.a Crossing Project. The project is currently identified as unknown based on WSDOT's current planning horizon for the multi - modal terminal, which is beyond 2035 or even 2040. Although the project is still included on WSDOT's list of future improvements, it remains unfunded, and the City does not know when funding will be allocated for it to move forward. When the capital plan for the ferry is updated in the future, the City may have more information about the project's timing. Chair Lovell commented that it is good to see that there are a lot of projects taking shape to meet the needs and cravings of the citizens. Things are moving towards the betterment of the City's infrastructure overall. He asked if there has been any interface between various City departments and the Tree Board, particularly in regard to street trees. The impact that some species of street trees can have on sidewalk infrastructure is becoming a big concern, as repair and/or replacement is often required. He noted that concern has also been raised about the types of trees that are planted at the Civic Center Field, which could end up blocking views. Ms. Hite said managing trees requires a joint effort, and the Parks, Planning and Public Works staff all work with the Tree Board, depending on the topic. Chair Lovell said he has heard that effort is being made to ensure that new trees are selected to be the right species, size and growth pattern to protect the City's infrastructure. Chair Lovell announced that a public hearing on the draft CIP and CFP is scheduled for October 12th. He encouraged Board Members to forward any outstanding questions directly to staff so they can be answered at the public hearing. REVIEW OF EXTENDED AGENDA Chair Lovell reviewed the updated Extended Agenda, noting that a public hearing on the CIP and CFP is scheduled for October 12th. Staff will also present an update on the Comprehensive Plan Amendments pertaining to parks, Highway 99, street trees and water. On October 26th, the agenda will include a presentation on the University of Washington/Forterra Plan that was prepared for Five Corners, a discussion on the land use procedures code update, and an update on the Highway 99 Subarea Plan. PLANNING BOARD CHAIR COMMENTS Chair Lovell did not provide any additional comments. PLANNING BOARD MEMBER COMMENTS Board Member Crank reported that she and Vice Chair Rubenkonig attended the City's Volunteer Dinner. Board Member Monroe reported on his attendance at the September 21" meeting of the Edmonds Citizens Economic Development Commission where they put together a list of recommendations related to the Civic Field Master Plan. Most of the recommendations were driven by economic development. For example, they want to see a playfield that can attract users who will presumably shop in downtown Edmonds. The list was presented to the City Council on September 27th Vice Chair Rubenkonig recalled that the Board received an update and provided input on the Civic Field Master Plan at their last meeting. At that time, she asked if there is a City standard to guide how many trees are planted as part of the project. She noted that the park does not have a lot of trees now, and she felt there should be some criteria for how many trees would be considered adequate cover for this size of lot. She asked if trees would be considered as part of design review or as part of a future clearing and grading permit. Mr. Chave answered that tree placement and species should be addressed as part of the overall master plan. Ultimately, the Board makes a recommendation to the City Council, and the City Council finalizes the plan. The Board could address trees in its recommendation to the City Council, but they should be careful how the recommendation is phrased. Even if design review were required, the Architectural Design Board would be bound by the master plan that is approved by the City Council. He further explained that projects of this type do not require a tree cutting permit, since trees are addressed as part of the overall development permit associated with the master plan. Vice Chair Rubenkonig questioned how the City can identify how many trees are a good amount for the park. Mr. Chave said this issue should be addressed as part of the master plan concept. Any concerns the Board Members have should be addressed as part of their review of the master plan proposal. Vice Chair Rubenkonig asked if the landscape architect would use some type of standard to make the determination of how many trees are appropriate for the park. Mr. Chave said the standard would vary depending on the type of park. For example, an urban park would be very different from an open, Planning Board Minutes September 28, 2016 Page 8 Packet Pg. 10 2.A.a natural park. During the master plan discussion, the Board will have an opportunity to discuss the number and species of trees that are planted on the site, but the conceptual drawings that were presented at their last meeting did not get into that amount of detail. Vice Chair Rubenkonig said she would prefer to have a set figure to work with to determine if the proposed plan falls short or meets the standard. This is a great opportunity to improve the tree canopy of the City, and she does not want to miss the mark by not addressing what is considered to be a proper number of trees. Board Member Stewart said that, as a participant of the Civic Field Master Plan Advisory Group, she can raise this concern and seek input. Chair Lovell said his understanding is that the consultant is relying upon public input to create the master plan. If a citizen or Board Member believes that more trees are needed, he/she should make this desire known now so it can be addressed as part of the plan. Mr. Chave summarized that, at this time, there is no definition for what is considered to be an adequate number of trees. Board Member Rubenkonig said that is what she is asking for. She would hope that whatever trees are provided at Civic Field is consistent with what the Board envisions for the City's future Urban Forest Master Plan. Board Member Stewart advised that she received one application for the student representative position. If approved by the Board, the Edmonds/Woodway High School student is available to begin on October 12th. At Board Member Stewart's request, Vice Chair Rubenkonig agreed to interview the student. Board Member Stewart agreed to forward the application to staff and to Mayor Earling. Board Member Stewart announced that students from the group, Students Saving Salmon, will be conducting Stream Team Water Quality Monitoring Sessions this coming weekend, and Board Members are invited to attend. The events will take place on Saturday (10:00 a.m. at Shell Creek and 3:00 p.m. at Shellebarger Creek) and Sunday (9:00 a.m. at Willow Creek, and 11:30 at the Edmonds Marsh). Interested Board Members should contact her for more information. ADJOURNMENT The Board meeting was adjourned at 8:52 p.m. Planning Board Minutes September 28, 2016 Page 9 Packet Pg. 11 5.A Planning Board Agenda Item Meeting Date: 10/12/2016 Director Report Staff Lead: Shane Hope Department: Planning Division Prepared By: Rob Chave Background/History N/A Staff Recommendation N/A Narrative This is the periodic report from Development Services Director Shane Hope. Attachments: Director Report 10/7/2016 Packet Pg. 12 5.A.a Op Er)A. CJ U MEMORANDUM Date: October 7, 2016 To: Planning Board Members From: Shane Hope, Development Services Director Subject: Director Report The Planning Board meets next on October 7. The meeting's agenda will focus on updates for the 2017-2022 Capital Improvement Plan and the long-term Capital Facilities Plan, along with potential minor amendments to the Comprehensive Plan. REGIONAL NEWS Alliance for Housing Affordability The Alliance for Housing Affordability (AHA) met September 28 in Everett to discuss its upcoming work program and budget. The work program includes continuing to analyze housing data, to provide information to local government members, and to coordinate with non-profit housing organizations. Snohomish County Tomorrow "Stuck in Traffic" was the featured presentation by a Puget Sound Regional Council representative at the annual assembly of Snohomish County Tomorrow (SCT) on September 28. The presentation included data about the travel shed and congestion issues for our area. It was followed by discussion with the CEOs of Sound Transit and Community Transit about ways to address congestion. LOCAL NEWS Highway 99 Plan Open House The next open house for the Highway 99 area planning project is November 10th, between the hours of 6:00 and 8:00 pm at the Swedish Edmonds Hospital, 41" floor conference room. The open house will provide a first look at a draft plan for the area to address land use, transportation, housing, and other topics. Sustainable Cities Partnership The Sustainable Cities Partnership, a collaboration between Western Washington University and the City of Edmonds, got underway last month with a kick-off in Bellingham for several projects. Projects are slated throughout the current academic year. As results come in, updates will be provided to the Planning Board and City Council. 1 1 P a g e k1w Packet Pg. 13 5.A.a Architectural Design Board The Architectural Design Board will have a special meeting on November 2, beginning at 7:30 pm., for training with the City Attorney on board roles, quasi-judicial meetings, etc. Economic Development Commission The Economic Development Commission's next meeting is October 19. An agenda will be ready soon and posted online. Hearing Examiner The Hearing Examiner's next meeting is October 13. The public hearings will be on an appeal of an "Innocent Purchaser" proposed variance for the Meadowdale Community Clubhouse playground to replace existing play structures in the setbacks, and a review of the ADB's recommendation on the Madrona K-8 school replacement project. The Hearing Examiner makes the final decision on the design review and two associated conditional use permits. One is for school building area in excess of 60,000 sf; the other is for height of the gymnasium and o flag pole to be up to 35' in height per the Community Facilities requirements in ECDC a 17.100.050 for schools. o r m Historic Preservation L c The Historic Preservation Commission's next meeting will be on October 13. Items for eo discussion are the Gerdon House at 209 Caspers St. and the Bettinger House / Pink House at CD r 555 Main St. for inclusion on the Edmonds Historic Register. Also the Commission will discuss to final preparations for publishing the 2017 Historic Calendar. o Tree Board The Tree Board's last meeting was October 6. Items of discussion included Arbor Day Celebration and planting event, website updates, and event planning for 2017. The City's Tree Board consultant is beginning to work with staff to pull together the next Tree City USA application, a process that occurs annually. Forum on Immigrant and Refugee Experience A Vietnam refugee who survived the fall of Saigon in 1975 and went on to become a champion for refugees and immigrants in Western Washington will share her story at an Immigrant and Refugee Forum at the Edmonds Library on Wednesday, October 12t"' beginning at 6:00 pm. The forum is sponsored by the Edmonds Diversity Commission as part of its overall program that includes outreach and engagement of the community on key issues related to diversity, inclusion and/or discrimination experiences. City Council The City Council's October 4 meeting included the following planning -related items: 21 F1 Adoption of the Stormwater Management Code Update Ll Public Hearing on Intent to Dissolve Transportation Benefit District (recognizing that the City Council is now allowed to directly take on this role) Ll Adoption of Resolution to set public hearing on Nov. 1 to consider vacating a portion of 92nd Ave W. Packet Pg. 14 ❑ Approval to move Multifamily Tax Exemption Program Ordinance for Westgate to 5.A.a Consent Agenda ❑ Shoreline Master Program —City Council concurrence on remaining items to respond to Ecology's proposal. (A draft alternative/response, based on Council direction, will be prepared for October 18 consideration.) The Council's October 11 meeting will include: ❑ Presentation of the Preliminary 2017 City Budget ❑ Review of draft ordinance to modify parking time limit on Main Street between 3rd and 2nd avenues and on 2nd Avenue between Main and Bell streets ❑ Review of utility rate analysis. WOL&IAiWL1kWKWAII1i;U7_1;7 ❑ October 12-6:00 pm: Forum on Immigrant and Refugee Experience at Library Plaza Room ❑ October 18, 10:00 am —11:30 am: Rainwater Walk: follow a raindrop as it flows through our watershed in a complex network of above and below ground connections. On this walking tour, we'll explore an Edmonds neighborhood; including raingardens, storm drains, and other water catchment systems, and end on the trails of Yost Park to learn about the role that the clean flowing waters of Shell Creek played in the history of Edmonds. Dress for the weather — families welcome! Tour led by staff from the Engineering and Parks Departments. This tour is FREE, but please RSVP by calling 425- 771-0227 October 15, 10:00 am — 2:00 pm: Community Tree Planting Event at the open space by Main Street and 85t" Avenue Through November 6: "Hook, Line & Sinker", Edmonds Historical Museum new exhibit details the life cycle of salmon, the story of Native fishing, and the evolution of today's commercial fishing. 3 1 P a g e E L 0 a a� o: L 0 r 0 00 M LO Packet Pg. 15 6.A Planning Board Agenda Item Meeting Date: 10/12/2016 Public Hearing on the Proposed 2017-2022 Capital Facilities Plan/Capital Improvements Program Staff Lead: Rob English, City Engineer Department: Planning Division Prepared By: Rob Chave Background/History See Narrative below Staff Recommendation Forward the Draft 2017-2022 Capital Improvement Plan and Capital Facilities Program to the City Council with a recommendation of approval. Narrative Staff presented the initial draft of the 2017-2022 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) and Capital Facilities Program (CFP) to the Planning Board on September 28, 2016. Attached is a comparison matrix (Attachment 3) that shows the projects that have been added, deleted or revised compared to last year's version of the CIP and CFP documents. Staff will also provide additional information during the presentation in response to questions raised during the September 28th presentation. Background The City's Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) Element is a document updated annually and identifies capital projects for at least the next six years which support the City's Comprehensive Plan. The CFP contains a list of projects that need to be expanded or will be new capital facilities in order to accommodate the City's projected population growth in accordance with the Growth Management Act. Thus, capital projects that preserve existing capital facilities are not included in the CFP. These preservation projects are identified within the six -year capital improvement program (CIP) along with capital facility plan projects that encompass the projected expenditure needs for all city capital related projects. CFP vs. CIP The CFP and CIP are not the same thing; they arise from different purposes and are in response to different needs. While the CIP is a budgeting tool that includes capital and maintenance projects, tying those projects to the various City funds and revenues, the CFP is intended to identify longer term capital needs (not maintenance) and be tied to City level of service standards. The CFP is also required to be consistent with the other elements (transportation, parks, etc.) of the Comprehensive Plan, and there are restrictions as to how often a CFP can be amended. There are no such restrictions tied to the CIP. The proposed 2017-2022 CFP is attached as Attachment 1. The CFP has three project sections comprised of General, Transportation and Stormwater. The proposed 2017-2022 CIP is attached as Attachment 2. The CIP has two sections related to general and parks projects and each project list is organized by the City's financial fund numbers. Attachments: Packet Pg. 16 6.A Attachment 1: CFP 2017-2022 Attachment 2: CIP 2017-2022 Attachment 3: CFP-CIP Comparison Matrix (2016-2017) Packet Pg. 17 6.A.a CITY OF EDMONDS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN U~� 2017-2022 St. � P-3 %�p DRAFT Packet Pg. 18 6.A.a r c a� E a� O L Q E 76 .Q R U c tc d N a� v m U- 76 r .Q cv U N N O N ti O N d N O Q O L CL r CD CD r N N O N ti O N a U- U c m E t v m r r Q ;.o c a� E t v ca Q Packet Pg. 19 6.A.a CFP GENERAL r c a� E a� O L Q E 76 U c tc d N a� m U- 76 .Q U N N O N ti O N d N O Q O L CL r CD CD r N N O N ti O N a U c m E t v r r Q ;.o c a� E t v ca Q Packet Pg. 20 6.A.a r c a� E a� O L Q E 76 .Q R U c tc d N a� v m U- 76 r .Q cv U N N O N ti O N d N O Q O L CL r CD CD r N N O N ti O N a U- U c m E t v m r r Q ;.o c a� E t v ca Q Packet Pg. 21 City of Edmonds Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) 6.A.a Parks, General, and Regional Projects (2017-2022) Current Grant Project (2017-2022) Project Name Purpose Opportunity Phase Total Cost Revenue Source 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023-2( Aquatic Facility Meet citizen needs for an Aquatics $0 Public Vote Center (Feasibility study complete Unknown Conceptual $0 G.O. Bonds August 2009). $0 $0 Total 5-$23 Culturals Stud Initiate f....s b 1 ty study of pFav a $0 Community_ ,.f C.I.....nds Unknewn Genseptual $0 Part "`^'h p $0 f2EET $0 Total Unkno� Civic Center Development City master plan in progress $0 Public Vote RCO Land Conceptual $135,000 REET 1 / Grants $135,000 Acquisition $0 G.O. Bonds $135,000 Total $135,000 $1,500,000 $1,500,000 $3,135,1 Community Park / Athletic Complex - In cooperation with ESD#15 develop $0 Capital Campaign Old Woodway High School: Phase 2 and 3 a community park and athletic RCO Phase1 $0 REET 2 complex. Complete $0 School District $0 Foundation $0 Grants $0 Total Unkno, Parks & Facilities Maintenance & Operations Replace / Renovate deteriorating $0 Public Vote Building building in City Park. Unknown Conceptual $0 G.O. Bonds $0 $0 Total $3-4A Senior Center Waterfront Rehabilitate grounds, parking, $1,600,000 REET / Grants $1,600,000 Redevlopment/Walkway beach access and area around Unknown Conceptual $0 G.O. Bonds Senior Center, walkway access. $500,000 Park Impact Fees $500,000 $0 Private Partnership $2,100,000 Total $2,100,000 LO N N O N ti r Edmonds Crossing WSDOT Ferry / Mutimodal Relocate ferry terminal to Marina EIS $0 Federal (Unsecured) N Facility Beach. US DOT Completed $0 State Funds IL$0 Total Unkno, 11 U Public Market (Downtown Waterfront) Acquire and develop property for a year round public market. Unknown Conceptual $0 Grants $0 Total Unknoi 0) E Dn�,,ntnwn Pub! c Restroorn Locate, construct, and V Unknown Gonseptual $0 Grants r $0 TOW Q Edmonds Waterfront Analysis Develop alternatives to improve $150,000 General Local Funds $150,000 emergency access and safety Unknown Conceptual $0 Grants E improvements. $150,000 Total $150,000 Unknoi V $2,385,000 Annual CFP Totals $2,250,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,500,000 $1,500,000 Q Packet Pg. 22 6.A.a r c a� E a� O L Q E 76 .Q R U c tc d N a� v m U- 76 r .Q cv U N N O N ti O N d N O Q O L CL r CD CD r N N O N ti O N a U- U c m E t v m r r Q ;.o c a� E t v ca Q Packet Pg. 23 CITY OF EDMONDS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN DESCRIPTION PROJECT NAME: Aquatic Facility ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $5,000,000 — $23,000,000 Man PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Implement recommendations of the Aquatics Feasibility Study completed in 2009. Six scenarios were presented and the plan recommended by the consultants was a year round indoor pool with an outdoor recreational opportunity in the summer. The project is dependent upon a public vote. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: The current Yost Pool, built in 1972, is nearing the end of its life expectancy. The comprehensive study done in 2009 assessed the needs and wants of Edmonds citizens in regard to its aquatic future as well as the mechanical condition of the current pool. SCHEDULE: 2021-2037 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023-2037 Planning/Study Eng. & Admin. Construction 1 % for Art TOTAL $5m - $23m x all or part of this Project may quality for 1% for the Arts 7 Packet Pg. 24 CITY OF EDMONDS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN DESCRIPTION PROJECT NAME: Civic Center Development ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $3,135,000 / Stadium Demolition PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Civic Center Development / Stadium Demolition. As part of the Master planning process for Civic, and in consideration of the current condition of the stadium, it is being recommended to demolish the current stadium. The City also has some grant funds available to assist with this. In addition, develop a signature downtown park at this site. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Civic Center Development / Stadium Demolition. The Civic Master plan will be complete by early 2017. Funds will be set aside, and grant funds applied for in order to develop the master plan. This is a high priority in the PROS plan. SCHEDULE: 2017 - 2022 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Construction $135,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,500,000 $1,500,000 TOTAL $135,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,500,000 $1,500,000 Packet Pg. 25 CITY OF EDMONDS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN DESCRIPTION PROJECT NAME: Community Park / Athletic ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: Unknown Complex at the Former Woodway High School ra CIA HOGAN - --------- - ... - _ -- f I rC)R lER wOODWAY HIGH SCHOOL ATHLETIC FIELD IMPROVEMENTS PRE PAnto fOX THE E DMON DS SCHOOL DISH ICT MAY FOV PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Develop community park and regional athletic complex with lighted or unlighted fields and recreational amenities in partnership with Edmonds School District, community colleges, user groups, and other organizations. Development dependent upon successful regional capital campaign. $10m - $12M project for all 3 phases. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: The site is currently an underutilized and under maintained facility with great potential as community multi -use active park. Site has existing controlled access, greenbelt, parking and 4-court tennis facility with substandard fields. Highly urbanized area with 150,000 residents within 5-mile radius. Future maintenance supported by user fees. Phase 1 was completed in 2015 for $4.2M, Phases 2 & 3 will be completed in the future for an additional $6-8M. SCHEDULE: 2017-2037 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023- COST 2037 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration Construction 1 % for Art TOTALI I I Unknown " all or a portion of this project may quality for 1 % for the Arts 9 Packet Pg. 26 CITY OF EDMONDS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN DESCRIPTION PROJECT NAME: Parks & Facilities ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $3-$4 Million Maintenance & Operations Building Building Outline Perime(er zone — 4,200 sf Existing Fence Line PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The 40 year old maintenance building in City Park is reaching the end of its useful life and is in need of major renovation or replacement. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Parks and Facilities Divisions have long outgrown this existing facility and need additional work areas and fixed equipment in order to maintain City parks and Capital facilities for the long term. SCHEDULE: Contingent on finding additional sources of revenue from general and real estate taxes. COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023-2037 Planning/Stud Eng. & Admin. Construction 1 % for Art TOTAL $3m - $4m * all or part of this Project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts 10 Packet Pg. 27 CITY OF EDMONDS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN DESCRIPTION 6.A.a PROJECT NAME: Waterfront Redevelopment ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $2,100,000 / Waterfront Walkway Completion Euf�� 1�C R�.� �•{yljl �� - To Bncn }- 7 -� ' ----- -------------- ------ ®R.--� A 4 kYr�4 Prapvwd Rmw4 W arerlront Ganrer j ;I ;rrra5: r �Mw ww r 1 - .. rnrrw rarer. - � raAmrwrtdno � rrnrprre� BEa Ova � j�� 1�• 4�EEYw'�trRa•- r . �.�• $ nop..W ww.e��w ia. trm O zsz PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Work with Sr. Center to renovate surrounding park, parking lot and walkway. Remove creosote pier, reintroduce habitat for fish and wildlife. Increase access to the waterfront. Connect waterfront walkway from Brackett's Landing South to Olympic Beach, including completion in front of the Ebb tide condominiums. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Provide anew Senior and Community Center and provide a new beachfront walkway. One of the top priorities in the PROS plan is to open up beach -front access. SCHEDULE: 2017-2022 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Planning/Study $100,000 Eng. & Admin. Construction $2,000,000 $0 $0 $0 1 % for Art TOTAL $2,100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 all or part of this Project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts 11 Packet Pg. 28 CITY OF EDMONDS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION 6.A.a PROJECT NAME: Edmonds Crossing ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: Unknown WSDOT Ferry / Multimodal Facility 011114*�M* Modified Pt. Edwards Alternative p - uHacu paf of�'s„y,� �.r ym ee mnmaol A1r4r IMrJ� yQy„ w.nvwr �� mom am •.w Edw��.ls .e+.s..nm PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Edmonds Crossing is multimodal transportation center that will provide the capacity to respond to growth while providing improved opportunities for connecting various forms of travel including rail, ferry, bus, walking and ridesharing. NOTE: The design of Marina Beach Park is a separate project. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: To provide an efficient point of connection between existing and planned transportation modes. SCHEDULE: 2023-2037 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023- 2037 Engineering & Administration of Way —Right Construction 1 % for Art TOTAL Unknown all or part of this project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts 12 Packet Pg. 29 CITY OF EDMONDS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT NAME: Public Market (Downtown ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: Unknown Waterfront) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Work with community partners to establish a public market, year around, on the downtown waterfront area. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: The project will help to create a community gathering area, boost economic development, bring tourists to town, and will be a valuable asset to Edmonds. SCHEDULE: This project depends on the ability to secure grant funding, and community partners willing to work with the city to establish this. This potentially can be accomplished by 2018. COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023-2037 Planning/Study Eng. & Admin. Construction 1 % for Art TOTAL Unknown * all or part of this project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts. 13 Packet Pg. 30 6.A.a CITY OF EDMONDS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT NAME: Edmonds Waterfront ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: Unknown Analysis PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Alternative analysis to study, 1) Waterfront access issues emphasizing and prioritizing near term solutions to providing emergency access, also including, but not limited to, 2) At grade conflicts where Main and Dayton Streets intersect BNSF Rail lines, 3) Pedestrian/bicycle access, and 4) Options to the Edmonds Crossing Multimodal Terminal Project (Identified as Modified Alternative 2) within the 2004 Final Environmental Impact Statement. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve waterfront access. SCHEDULE: 2017-2018 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023-2037 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration $150,000 Construction 1 % for Art TOTAL $150,000 Unknown 14 Packet Pg. 31 6.A.a CFP TRANSPORTATION r c a� E a� O L Q E 76 U c tc d N a� m U- 76 .Q U N N O N ti O N d N O Q O L CL r CD CD r N N O N ti O N a U c m E t v r r Q ;.o c a� E t v ca Q 15 Packet Pg. 32 6.A.a r c a� E a� O L Q E 76 .Q R U c tc d N a� v m U- 76 r .Q cv U N N O N ti O N d N O Q O L CL r CD CD r N N O N ti O N a U- U c m E t v m r r Q ;.o c a� E t v ca Q 16 Packet Pg. 33 City of Edmonds Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) Transportation Projects (2017-2022) Grant �ProjectPhase� (2017-2022) ProjectNamePur ose Opportunity Total Cost Funding Source 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023-2037 saf _tv i ranar/ry Ana/�c 228th St. SW Corridor Safety Realign highly skewed intersection to $25,000 (Federal or State secured) $25,000 Improvements address safety and improve $0 (Federal or State unsecured) operations; create new east -west corridor between SR-99 and 1-5. Construction $0 (Unsecured) $0 (Local Funds) $0 Total 228th St. SW from Hwy 99 to 95th PI. Install two-way left turn lanes and $0 (Federal or State secured) W sidewalks to improve capacity and $375,000 (Federal or State unsecured) $75,000 $300,000 $8,690,000 pedestrian safety (project split with Snohomish County) Possible Grant Conceptual $0 (Unsecured) $0 (Local Funds) $1,356,000 $375,000 Total $75,000 $300,000 $10,046,000 76th Av. W @ 212th St. SW Intersection improvements to $3,006,500 (Federal or State secured) $2,920,000 $86,500 Intersection Improvements improve intersection delay and level $0 (Federal or State unsecured) of service (LOS). Construction $0 (Unsecured) $2,086,663 (Local Funds) $2,073,163 $13,500 $5,093,163 Total $4,993,163 $100,000 Highway 99 Gateway / Revitalization Install gateway elements and safety $10,000,000 (Federal or State secured) $5,000,000 $5,000,000 improvements along SR-99 Corridor. $2,600,000 (Federal or State unsecured) $1,600,000 $1,000,000 $72,400,000 Stale Conceptual $0 (Unsecured) Appropriation $300,000 (Local Funds) $300,000 $12,900,000 Total $300,000 $6,600,000 $6,000,000 $72,400,000 SR 524 (196th St. SW) / 88th Ave W Improve intersection safety by $0 (Federal or State secured) Intersection Improvements converting a stop controlled $744,500 (Federal or State unsecured) $122,000 $87,500 $535,000 intersection for NB and SB movements to a signalized Possible Grant Conceptual $0 (Unsecured) intersection. $158,500 (Local Funds) $71,000 $87,500 $903,000 Total $193,000 $175,000 $535,000 Main St. and 9th Ave S Install traffic signal to improve $0 (Federal or State secured) intersection delay and Level of $894,000 (Federal or State unsecured) $118,000 $776,000 Service (mini roundabout is an alternative solution). Possible Grant Conceptual $0 (Unsecured) $17,000 (Local Funds) $17,000 $911,000 Total $135,000 $776,000 76th Ave. W @ 220th St. SW Convert split phasing operation for $0 (Federal or State secured) Intersection Improvements EB and WB movements to $5,637,450 (Federal or State unsecured) $285,450 $1,557,000 $3,795,000 concurrent through movements, with protected / permissive LT phasing. Possible Grant Conceptual $0 (Unsecured) $287,550 (Local Funds) $44,550 $243,000 $5,925,000 Total $330,000 $1,800,000 $3,795,000 Hwy 99 @ 212th St SW Intersection Widen 212th St. SW to add a $0 (Federal or State secured) Improvements westbound left turn lane for 200' $2,783,000 (Federal or State unsecured) $152,000 $1,091,000 $1,540,000 storage length and an eastbound left turn lane. Possible Grant Conceptual $0 (Unsecured) $23,000 (Local Funds) $23,000 $2,806,000 Total $175,000 $1,091,000 $1,540,000 6.A.a fC r .Q fC U N 04 O N ti r O N to 0 Q O d L a� a 17 Packet Pg. 34 City of Edmonds Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) Transportation Projects (2017-2022) Grant (2017-2022) 1 Project Name Purpose Opportunity Pro'ectPhase Total Cost Funding Source 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023-2037 Hwy. 99 @ 216th St. SW Intersection Widen 216th St. SW to add a left $0 (Federal or State secured) Improvement turn lane for eastbound and $2,313,000 (Federal or State unsecured) $142,000 $334,000 $1,837,000 westbound movements. Possible Grant Conceptual $0 (Unsecured) $22,000 (Local Funds) $22,000 $2 335 000 Total $164,000 $334,000 $1 837,000 Hwy. 99 @ 220th St. SW Intersection Widen 220th St. SW and Hwy 99 to $0 (Federal or State secured) Improvement add a westbound right turn lane (for 325' storage length) and a soutbound $3,192,000 (Federal or State unsecured) $152,000 $1,085,000 $1,955,000 left turn lane (for 275' storage Possible Grant Conceptual $0 (Unsecured) length). $23,000 (Local Funds) $23,000 $3,215,000 Total $175,000 $1,085,000 $1,955,000 SR-104 @ 226th St. SW / 15th St. SW Extend left turn storage area for WB $0 (Federal or State secured) Intersection Improvements movement on SR-104 w/various $179,000 (Federal or State unsecured) $15,000 $164,000 bicycle and pedestrian improvements. Possible Grant Conceptual $0 (Unsecured) $15,000 (Local Funds) $15,000 $194,000 Total $30,000 $164,000 SR-104 @ 95th PI. W Intersection Convert EB and WB LT along SR- $0 (Federal or State secured) Improvements 104 to protected LT phasing; $485,000 (Federal or State unsecured) $65,000 $420,000 upgrade ADA curb ramps; and add C-Curb for access management Possible Grant Conceptual $0 (Unsecured) $10,000 (Local Funds) $10,000 $495,000 Total $75,000 $420,000 SR-104 @ 238th St. SW Intersection Install traffic signal to improve $0 (Federal or State secured) Improvements vehicular and pedestrian safety; $1,311,000 (Federal or State unsecured) $173,000 $1,138,000 revise geometry to allow for safer turns. Possible Grant Conceptual $0 (Unsecured) $27,000 (Local Funds) $27,000 $1,338,000 Total $200,000 $1,138,000 Olympic View Dr. @ 76th Ave. W Install traffic signal to reduce the $0 (Federal or State secured) Intersection Improvements intersection delay and improve Level $0 (Federal or State unsecured) $1,183,000 of Service. Conceptual $0 (Unsecured) $0 (Local Funds) $0 Total $1,183,000 84th Ave. W (212th St. SW to 238th Install two-way left turn lanes and $0 (Federal or State secured) St. SW) sidewalk to improve capacity and $0 (Federal or State unsecured) $15,441,000 pedestrian safety (split with Snohomish County) Conceptual $0 (Unsecured) $0 (Local Funds) $0 Total $15,441,000 6.A.a fC r .Q fC U N 04 O N ti r O N to O IZ O d d L LO N N O 111 ti r O N IL LL U r C E t V fC r r Q r-i C d L V f3 a� a 18 Packet Pg. 35 City of Edmonds Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) Transportation Projects (2017-2022) Grant (2017-2022) 1 Project Name Purpose Opportunity ProiectPhase Total Cost Funding Source 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023-2037 SR-104 @ 100th Ave. W Intersection / Implement Westgate Circulation $0 (Federal or State secured) Westgate Area Improvements Access Plan, midblock pedestrian $0 (Federal or State unsecured) $1,017,468 crossings along 1001h Ave. W, and rechannelizalion with bike lanes Conceptual $0 (Unsecured) sharrows along 100th Ave. W. $0 (Local Funds) $0 Total $1 017 468 SR-104 @ 76th Ave. W Intersection Add a 2nd W B left turn lane (split $0 (Federal or State secured) Improvements with Shoreline). $0 (Federal or State unsecured) $3,017,000 Conceptual $0 (Unsecured) $0 (Local Funds) $0 Total $3 017 000 Olympic View Dr. @ 174th St. SW Install traffic signal to improve Level $0 (Federal or State secured) Intersection Improvements of Service and intersection delay. $0 (Federal or State unsecured) Conceptual $0 (Unsecured) $610,000 $0 (Local Funds) $0 Total $610 000 Non -motorized Pedestrian /Bicvcie Proiects Sunset Ave. Walkway from Bell St. to Provide walkway on the west side of $157,121 (Federal or State secured) $157,121 Gaspers St. Sunset Ave, with various utility Possible $1,870,000 (Federal or State unsecured) $1,870,000 upgrades. RCO / TIB Grant Design $0 (Unsecured) for construction $751,129 (Local Funds) $26,129 $725,000 $2,778,250 Total $183,250 $2,595,000 Dayton St. between 7th Ave. S to 8th Provide safe sidewalk along short $0 (Federal or State secured) Ave. S Walkway missing link. $37,500 (Federal or State unsecured) $37,500 Possible Grant Conceptual $0 (Unsecured) $37,500 (Local Funds) $37,500 $75,000 Total $75,000 232nd St. SW from 100th Ave. W to Improve pedestrian safety along $0 (Federal or State secured) SR-104 232nd St. SW from 100th Ave. to $1,205,000 (Federal or State unsecured) $100,000 $1,105,000 SR-104. Possible Grant Conceptual $0 (Unsecured) $100,000 (Local Funds) $100,000 $1,305,000 Total $200,000 $1,105,000 238th St. SW from 100th Ave. W to Improve pedestrian safety along $12,000 (Federal or State secured) $12,000 104th Ave. W 238th St. SW from 100th Ave. to 104th Ave. $0 (Federal or State unsecured) Construction $0 (Unsecured) $0 (Local Funds) $12,000 Total $12,000 236th St SW from Edmonds Way (SR- Improve pedestrian safety along $50,600 (Federal or State secured) $50,600 104) to Madrona Elementary 236th St. SW, creating a safe $0 (Federal or State unsecured) pedestrian connection from SR-104 to Madrona school. Construction $0 (Unsecured) $38,000 (Local Funds) $38,000 $88,600 Total $88,600 236th St SW from Edmonds Way Improve pedestrian safety along $0 (Federal or State secured) (SR-104) to 97th Ave. W 236th St. SW, creating a safe $1,288,500 (Federal or State unsecured) $106,500 $1,182.000 pedestrian connection from SR-104. Possible Grant Conceptual $0 (Unsecured) $106,500 (Local Funds) $106,500 $1,395,000 Total $213,000 $1,182,000 6.A.a fC r .Q fC U N N O N ti O N N O Q O d L C CU a) 0 7 d LO r N N O N ti r O N d LL U r C t V fC r..r Q r-i C d L v f3 a� a 19 Packet Pg. 36 City of Edmonds Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) Transportation Projects (2017-2022) Grant (2017-2022) Project Name Purpose O ortuni Project Phase Total Cost Funding Source 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023-2037 84th Ave. W from 238th St. SW to Improve pedestrian safety along 84th $0 (Federal or State secured) 234th St. SW Ave. W. from 238th St. SW to 234th $90,000 (Federal or State unsecured) $90,000 $495,000 St. SW. Possible Grant Conceptual $0 (Unsecured) $0 (Local Funds) $90,000 Total $90,0001 $495,000 80th Ave. W from 212th St SW to Improve pedestrian safety along 80th $0 (Federal or State secured) 206th St. SW Ave. W, within proximity to Edmonds $1,439,000 (Federal or State unsecured) $210,000 $1,229,000 Woodway High School. Possible Grant Conceptual $0 (Unsecured) $0 (Local Funds) $1,439,000 Total $210 000 $1 229 000 2nd Ave. S from James St. to Main St. Provide safe sidewalk along short $0 (Federal or State secured) Walkway missing link. $0 (Federal or State unsecured) Conceptual $0 (Unsecured) $30,000 (Local Funds) $30,000 $30,000 Total $30,000 Maplewood Dr. from Main St. to 200th Provide safe sidewalk, connecting to $0 (Federal or State secured) St. SW ex. sidewalk along 200th St. SW $1,591,000 (Federal or State unsecured) $230,000 $681,000 $680,000 (direct link to Maplewood Elementary School). Possible grant Conceptual $0 (Unsecured) $0 (Local Funds) $1,591,000 Total $230,000 $681,000 $680,000 95th PI. W from 224th St. SW to 220th Provide sidewalk on one side of 95th $0 (Federal or State secured) St. SW PI. W from 224th St. SW to 220th St. $409,000 (Federal or State unsecured) $84,000 $325,000 SW completing missing link) Possible Grant Conceptual $0 (Unsecured) $141,000 (Local Funds) $21,000 $120,000 $550,000 Total $105,000 $445,000 218th St. SW from 76th Ave. W to Provide safe sidewalk along a $0 (Federal or State secured) 84th Ave. W missing link of 218th St. SW. from 76th Ave. to 84th Ave. $978,000 (Federal or State unsecured) $100,000 $878,000 Possible Grant Conceptual $0 (Unsecured) $327,000 (Local Funds) $100,000 $227,000 $1,305,000 Total $200,000 $1,105,000 Walnut St from 3rd Ave. S to 4th Ave. Provide short missing link. $0 (Federal or State secured) S Walkway $105,000 (Federal or State unsecured) $105,000 Possible Grant Conceptual $0 (Unsecured) $0 (Local Funds) $105,000 Total $105,000 216th St. SW Walkway from Hwy. 99 Provide sidewalk on north side of $0 (Federal or State secured) to 72nd Ave W 216th St. SW from Hwy. 99 to 72nd $137,000 (Federal or State unsecured) $137,000 Ave W (completing missing link) Possible Grant Conceptual $0 (Unsecured) $20,000 (Local Funds) $20,000 $157,000 Total $157,000 238th St. SW from SR-104 to Hwy. 99 Provide sidewalk on north side of $316,800 (Federal or State secured) $316,800 238th St. SW from SR-104 to Hwy. $0 (Federal or State unsecured) 99 (completing missing link) Design $0 (Unsecured) $96,200 (Local Funds) $96,200 $413,000 Total $413,000 15th St. SW from 8th Ave. S to 9th Provide sidewalk on south side of $0 (Federal or State secured) Ave. S 15th St. SW from 8th Ave. S to 9th $200,000 (Federal or State unsecured) $200,000 Ave. S (completing missing link) Conceptual $0 (Unsecured) $30,000 (Local Funds) $30,000 $230,000 Total $30,000 $200,000 6.A.a LO r N N O N ti r O N a - ILL. U r C E t V fC r Q r-i C d L v f3 a 20 Packet Pg. 37 City of Edmonds Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) Transportation Projects (2017-2022) Grant �ProjectPhase� (2017-2022) 1 Project Name Purpose OpportunitV Total Cost I Funding Source 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023-2037 Elm Way from 8th Ave. S to 9th Ave. Provide sidewalk on one side of Elm $0 (Federal or State secured) S Way from 8th Ave. S to 9th Ave. S $789,000 (Federal or State unsecured) $156,000 $633,000 Possible Grant Conceptual $0 (Unsecured) $0 (Local Funds) $789 000 Total $156 000 $633 000 Minor Sidewalk Program Complete short sidewalk stretches $0 (Federal or State secured) throughout the City (annual program) $0 (Federal or State unsecured) Conceptual $0 (Unsecured) $320,000 (Local Funds) $70,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $700,000 $320,000 Total $70 000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $700 000 191 at St. SW from 80th Ave. W to Provide sidewalk on one side of $0 (Federal or State secured) 76th Ave. W 191th St. SW from 80th Ave. to 76th $0 (Federal or State unsecured) $630,000 Ave. (completing missing link) Conceptual $0 (Unsecured) $0 (Local Funds) $0 Total $630 000 104th Ave. W / Robinhood Lane from Provide sidewalk on west side of $0 (Federal or State secured) 238th St. SW to 1061h Ave. W 104th Ave. from 238th St. SW to 106th Ave. W (completing missing $0 (Federal or State unsecured) $990,000 link) Conceptual $0 (Unsecured) $0 (Local Funds) $0 Total $990,000 80th Ave. W from 2181h St. SW to Provide sidewalk on one side of 80th $0 (Federal or State secured) 220th St. SW Ave. W from 218th St. SW to 220th $0 (Federal or State unsecured) $315,000 St. SW (completing missing link) Conceptual $0 (Unsecured) $0 (Local Funds) $0 Total $315,000 841h Ave. W from 1881h St. SW to Provide sidewalk on one side of 84th $0 (Federal or State secured) 1861h St. SW Ave. W from 188th St. SW to 186th $0 (Federal or State unsecured) $315,000 St. SW Conceptual $0 (Unsecured) $0 (Local Funds) $0 Total $315,000 236th St. SW from Hwy. 99 to 76th Provide sidewalk on one side of $0 (Federal or State secured) Ave. W 236th St. SW from Hwy. 99 to 76th Ave. W $0 (Federal or State unsecured) $765,000 Conceptual $0 (Unsecured) $0 (Local Funds) $0 Total $765 000 238th St. SW from Hwy. 99 to 76th Provide sidewalk on one side of $0 (Federal or State secured) Ave. W 238th St. SW from Hwy. 99 to 76th Ave W $0 (Federal or State unsecured) $1,170,000 Conceptual $0 (Unsecured) $0 (Local Funds) $0 Total $1,170,000 6.A.a fC r .Q fC U N N O N ti O N In O Q O i d d L LO r N N O N ti r O N d LL U r C E t V fC r..r Q C d L v R a 21 Packet Pg. 38 City of Edmonds Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) Transportation Projects (2017-2022) Grant (2017-2022) 1 Project Name Purpose Opportunity Pro'ectPhase Total Cost I Funding Source 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023-2037 80th Ave. W / 180th St. SW from Provide sidewalk on one side of 80th $0 (Federal or State secured) 188th St. SW to OVD Ave. W / 180th St. SW from 188th $0 (Federal or State unsecured) $1,350,000 St. SW to OVD Conceptual $0 (Unsecured) $0 (Local Funds) $0 Total $1,350,000 189th PI. SW from 80th Ave. W to Provide sidewalk on one side of $0 (Federal or State secured) 761h Ave. W 189th PI. SW from 80th Ave. W to 76th Ave. W $0 (Federal or State unsecured) $585,000 Conceptual $0 (Unsecured) $0 (Local Funds) $0 Total $585 000 Fem/Railroad Ferry Storage Improvements from Improve ferry queueing by extending $0 (Federal or State secured) Pine St. to Dayton St. ferry storage area along SR-104 $357,000 (Federal or State unsecured) $357,000 (striping changes). Possible Grant Conceptual $0 (Unsecured) $0 (Local Funds) $357,000 Total $357,000 Traffic Plannina Proiects Trackside Warning System at Dayton Install wayside horns at both $0 (Federal or State secured) St. and Main St. Railroad Crossings crossings to reduce noise from train horns. $0 (Federal or State unsecured) Design / $0 (Unsecured) Construction $10,000 (Local Funds) $10,000 $10,000 Total $10,000 $49,300,013 Annual CFP Totals $6,070,013 $150,000 $50,000 $5,760,000 $18,278,000 $18,992,000 $111,029,468 Revenue Summary by Year Totals Source 1 2017 2018 2019 1 2020 2021 2022 2023.2037 $13,568,021 Total Federal R State Secured $3,481,521 $86,500 $0 $0 $5,000,000 $5,000,000 $0 $30,809,950 Total Federal R State Unsecured $0 $0 $0 $4,517,450 $12,577,500 $13,715,000 $108,363,468 $0 Unsecured $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $610,000 $4947042 Local Funds $2,613,492 $63,500 $50,000 $1,242,550 $700,500 $277,000 $2,056,000 6.A.a (C r .Q (C U N N O N ti r O N (D (n O Q O t_ d d L as LO r N N O N ti r O N d LL U r C E t V (C r r Q r-i C d L V (3 a� a 22 Packet Pg. 39 6.A.a CITY OF EDMONDS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT NAME: 228 th St. SW Corridor ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $7,300,000 Safety Improvements J PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 1) Extend 228th St across the unopened right-of-way to 761h Avenue West 2) Signalize the intersection of 228th St SW @ SR99 and 228th St. SW @ 761h Ave. West 3) Construct a raised median in the vicinity of 76th Avenue West. 4) Add illumination between 2241h St SW and 228th St SW on SR 99 5) Overlay of 228th St. SW from 801h Ave. W to — 2,000' east of 76th Ave. W. PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: The project will improve access / safety to the 1-5 / Mountlake Terrace Park & Ride from SR99. This east / west connection will reduce demand and congestion along two east - west corridors (220th Street SW and SR104). Roadway safety will also be improved as SR 99/ 228th Street SW will become a signalized intersection. 228th St. SW is being overlaid from 801h PI. W to — 1,000 LF east of 72nd Ave. W. as well as 76th Ave. W from 228th St. SW to Hwy. 99. The project consists of various utility upgrades. SCHEDULE: Construction began in 2015 and substantial completion was obtained in May 2016. Physical completion is scheduled to be reached in September 2016. The only remaining task in 2017 is the completion of the Federal documentation. Federal and State grants were secured for the construction phase. This project was combined into one construction contract with the Hwy. 99 (Phase 3) Lighting project. COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Planning/Study Engineering, Administration, and ROW Construction $25,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $25,000 All or a portion of this project may qualify for 1 % for the arts 23 Packet Pg. 40 6.A.a CITY OF EDMONDS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT NAME: 228 th St. SW from Hwy. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $10,421,000 99 to 95th PI. W PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Widen 228 th St. SW from Hwy. 99 to 95 th PI. W to three lanes with two-way left turn lane), with curb and gutter, sidewalk, and bike lanes. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This project would improve pedestrian safety and traffic flow along this corridor. SCHEDULE: The design phase is scheduled to begin in 2021 (pending funding). COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023-2036 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration $75,000 $300,000 Construction $9,821,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $75,000 $300,000 $9,821,000 24 Packet Pg. 41 6.A.a CITY OF EDMONDS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT NAME: 76"' Ave W @ 212"' St. SW ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $6,500,000 Intersection Improvements 0 tUMUNUb-VVUUUVVHY HIGH SCHOOL Fi W R K:0 ..ir-4 7301 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Add a northbound and southbound left -turn lane to convert the signal operation for those approaches from split phasing to protected -permissive phasing. Add a right -turn lane for the westbound, southbound, and northbound movements. The project also consists of various utility upgrades and conversion of overhead utilities to underground. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Reduce the intersection delay and improve the existing level of service from LOS D (LOS F by 2015) to LOS C. SCHEDULE: Design was completed in May 2016. The project was advertised in June 2016 but the lowest bid was rejected since it was - $1.3 Million over budget. The project is scheduled to be re - advertised in early 2017. A TIB grant to cover the possible shortfall was submitted in August 2016. COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration & ROW Construction $4,993,163 $100,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $4,993,163 $100,000 25 Packet Pg. 42 6.A.a CITY OF EDMONDS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT NAME: SR-99 Access Management ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $85,000,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The project would include, among other features, wider replacement sidewalks or new sidewalk where none exist today, new street lighting, center medians for access control and turning movements, etc., attractive and safe crosswalks, better stormwater management, targeted utility replacements, potential undergrounding of overhead utilities, landscaping and other softscape treatments to identify the area as being in Edmonds. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve aesthetics, safety, user experience, and access management along this corridor. In addition, economic development would be improved. SCHEDULE: The design phase is scheduled to begin in 2017 (pending approval of the 2017 decision package).An HSIP grant was also submitted in July 2016for this project. The construction phase is scheduled to begin in 2021 (pending additional funding / $10M from Connecting Washington allocation has been secured). COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023-2036 COST Planning/Study Engineering & $300,000 $600,000 $1,000,000 Administration & ROW Construction $1,000,000 $4,000,000 $78,100,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $300,000 $600,000 $2,000,000 $4,000,000 $78,100,000 26 Packet Pg. 43 6.A.a CITY OF EDMONDS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT NAME: SR-524 (196t" St. SW)/ 88t" ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $903,000 Ave. W Intersection Improvements 3 � w W a a_ F SEVEN DAY ADVENTST r CHURCH 196TH ST SW 196TH ST SW 2 w Z (7 m o V EL CO) 7 i PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install traffic signal at the intersection of 196 th St. SW @ 88 th Ave. W. The modeling in the 2009 Transportation Plan indicated that restricting northbound and southbound traffic to right -turn -only (prohibiting left -turn and through movements) would also address the deficiency identified at this location through 2025. This is same alternative as one concluded by consultant in 2007 study but not recommended by City Council. This could be implemented as an alternate solution, or as an interim solution until traffic signal warrants are met. The ex. LOS is F (below City Standards: LOS D). This project was ranked #6 in the Roadway Project Priority in the 2015 Transportation Plan. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve traffic flow characteristics and safety at the intersection. The improvement would modify LOS to A, but increase the delay along 196t" St. SW. SCHEDULE: The intersection LOS must meet MUTCD traffic signal warrants and be approved by WSDOT since 196t" St. SW is a State Route (SR524). No funding is currently allocated to this project (pending grant funding). COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Planning/Study Engineering & $193,000 $175,000 Administration & ROW Construction $535,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $193,000 $175,000 $535,000 27 Packet Pg. 44 CITY OF EDMONDS 6.A.a CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT NAME: Main St and 9"' Ave. S I ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $911,000 W a x -on W1 IIIIIIIIII MR BELL 5T -� rr IP W a _J_ x MAIN sT J � W J S DAYTON ST Z- WADE JAMES THEATER PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Installation of a traffic signal (or mini -roundabout is an alternative solution). PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: The existing intersection is stop -controlled for all approaches and the projected intersection LOS in 2035 is LOS F (below the City's concurrency standards: LOS D). The installation of a traffic signal would improve the intersection delay to LOS B. The project ranked #4 in the Roadway Project Priority of the 2015 Transportation Plan. SCHEDULE: All phases are scheduled between 2020 and 2021 (unsecured funding) COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration $135,000 Construction $776,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $135,000 $776,000 2s Packet Pg. 45 6.A.a CITY OF EDMONDS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT NAME: 2201hSt SW @ 76 th Ave W ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: Intersection Improvements $5,925,000 I � 219TH ST SW 21919 J � JI I _ 3 I � I a I F I J J 221STPLSW F71 -I-- TOP FOODS 22GTH ST SW l ----JIOO LYNWOOD HONDA STARBUCKS J PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Reconfigure eastbound lanes to a left turn lane and through / right turn lane. Change eastbound and westbound phases to provide protected -permitted phase for eastbound and westbound left turns. Provide right turn overlap for westbound movement during southbound left turn phase. (ROADWAY ROJECT PRIORITY #1 in 2015 Transportation Plan). PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Reduce the intersection delay and improve the LOS. The projected LOS in 2035 would be improved from LOS F to LOS D. SCHEDULE: Engineering, ROW, and construction scheduled between 2020 and 2022 (unsecured funding). COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Planning/Study Engineering & ROW $330,000 $1,800,000 Administration Construction $3,795,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $330,000 $1,800,000 $3,795,000 All or a portion of this project may qualify for 1 % for the arts 29 Packet Pg. 46 6.A.a CITY OF EDMONDS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT NAME: Hwy. 99 @ 212"' St. SW ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $2,806,000 intersection improvements Paul I 21 OT}�ST Parking a z 7313 n 3 Edmonds Ed—ntls Family Clinic ADN Public W—ks 'n Q KENNEL f Arbor Apt. = Q Gas m Yilla Oln = 2"11n2 Pumps I� st 212TH Para 7�7..5.• cuPlc B" a 'leg 7303 "3" Pool n � only "1 7342 "2" PARK & RIDE 47,114 STW W U W W PLANT 0 Q AEGIS SWEDISH m MONNS CAMPUS ' ALLIED / ROOFING / / / B&M / CON ST 21414 / 21448 / / / NIC nON ALd 0( / IALUE / ALLAGE / 16TH ST/SW PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Widen 212 th St. SW to add a westbound left turn lane for 200' storage length and an eastbound left turn lane for 300' storage length. Provide protected left turn phase for eastbound and westbound movements. (ROADWAY PROJECT PRIORITY in 2015 Transportation Plan: #4) PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve intersection efficiency and reduce delay. SCHEDULE: All phases are scheduled between 2020 and 2022 (unsecured funding).The project cost is split between Lynnwood and Edmonds since half the project is in Lynnwood. COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Planning/Study Engineering, $175,000 $1,091,000 ROW, & Administration Construction $1,540,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $175,000 $1,091,000 $1,540,000 30 Packet Pg. 47 6.A.a CITY OF EDMONDS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT NAME: Hwy. 99 @ 216 St. SW ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $2,335,000 intersection improvements ly-o 21412 21408 21405 12 21401 r Ce } 21420 21431 MCDOHALD' +n an z 150 00 04 215 AEG15 �1558 1g15 VALUE 7 VILLA ST SW � 216TH ST SW 21600{ 21619 KRUGER *Aq CLINIC 21632 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Widen 216t St. SW to add a westbound left turn lane for and an eastbound left turn lane. Provide protected -permissive left turn phases for eastbound and westbound movements. This project ranked #3 in the Roadway Project Priority in the 2015 Transportation Plan. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve intersection efficiency and reduce delay. SCHEDULE: All phases are scheduled between 2020 and 2022 (unsecured funding). COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Planning/Study Engineering & ROW & Administration $164,000 $334,000 Construction $1,837,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $164,000 $334,000 $1,837,000 31 Packet Pg. 48 6.A.a CITY OF EDMONDS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT NAME: Hwy. 99 @ 220"' St. SW ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $3,215,000 intersection improvements TOP FOODS 197H ST SW / 21919 STARBU 5 / / 220TH ST SW • I 7514 I 1221STPLSW FUNTASIA LYNWOOD HONOA a I I UG'S TRAYE LLE R'S IN N j w .F O 7223 'U' I 3 Ift td w —.2222 A .O. 7301 'H' r _ tim ass H M � a a x Ir 7 4 m �i 224TH ST SW PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Widen 220th St. SW to add Westbound right turn lane for 325' storage length. Widen SR-99 to add 21,d Southbound left turn lane for 275' storage length. (ROADWAY PROJECT PRIORITY in 2015 Transportation Plan: #1). PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Reduce intersection delay and improve traffic flow and safety. SCHEDULE: All Phases are scheduled between 2020 and 2022 (unsecured funding for all phases). COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 COST Planning/Study Engineering & Administration & ROW $175,000 $1,085,000 Construction $1.955,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $175,000 $1,085,000 $1,955,000 32 Packet Pg. 49 6.A.a CITY OF EDMONDS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT NAME: SR-104 @ 226 1h St. SW / ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $194,000 15t" St. SW Intersection Improvements 0 k/� k 226TH ST SW r 1 uJ 226TH PL SW IF L 1 L!]Er --' 14TH WAY SW PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Extend the left turn lane for the westbound movement on SR-104. Complete various pedestrian and bicycle intersection improvements. This project was identified in the SR-104 Complete Streets Corridor Analysis (completed in 2015). PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve non -motorized transportation safety at the intersection and improve traffic flow along the SR-104 corridor. SCHEDULE: 2020-2021 (unsecured funding) COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration & ROW $30,000 Construction $164,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $30,000 $164,000 33 Packet Pg. 50 6.A.a CITY OF EDMONDS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT NAME: SR-104 @ 95" PI. W ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $495,000 Intersection Improvements W r J a H Ln Cn 'H ST SW 1 WESTOAT C APE PARKING h I WESTGATE CHAPEL PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Upgrade all ADA Curb Ramps; and add C-Curb for access management. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve intersection safety for pedestrians and vehicles. SCHEDULE: 2020-2021 unsecured funding) COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration & ROW $75,000 Construction $420,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $75,000 $420,000 34 Packet Pg. 51 6.A.a CITY OF EDMONDS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT NAME: SR-104 @ 238" St. SW ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,338,000 Intersection Improvements J I • F1 W 238TH ST SW PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install traffic signal. The warrants are met for such an installation. This project was identified in the SR-104 Complete Street Corridor Analysis (completed in 2015). PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve vehicular and pedestrian safety. SCHEDULE: 2020-2021 (unsecured funding) COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration & ROW $200,000 Construction $1,138,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $200,000 $1,138,000 35 Packet Pg. 52 6.A.a CITY OF EDMONDS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT NAME: Olympic View Dr. @ 76 Ave. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: W Intersection Improvements $1,183,000 I SEAVIEW PARK 3 a r F n PLSW 18671-11 ST SW � m m POST 1 OFFICE J 4 I� I I I I I TOLUSON' M/ARR -ET PERRI VILLE 9 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install traffic signal (the intersection currently stop controlled for all movements). (ROADWAY ROJECT PRIORITY in 2015 Transportation Plan: #11). PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: The improvement will reduce the intersection delay. The projected Level of Service is LOS F in 2035, which is below the City's concurrency standards (LOS D). The project will improve the Level of Service to LOS B. SCHEDULE: Engineering and Construction are scheduled between 2023 and 2036 (unsecured funding). COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023-2036 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration $200,000 Construction 983,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $1,183,000 36 Packet Pg. 53 CITY OF EDMONDS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT NAME: 84 Ave. W (212 St. SW ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $15,441,000 to 238" St. SW) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Widen 84 th Ave. W to (3) lanes with curb, gutter, bike lanes, and sidewalk on each side of the street. (part of this project was ranked #6 in the Long Walkway list of the 2015 Transportation Plan). PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve overall safety of the transportation system along this collector street: 1) the sidewalk and bike lanes would provide pedestrians and cyclists with their own facilities and 2) vehicles making left turn will have their own lane, not causing any back-up to the through lane when insufficient gaps are provided. SCHEDULE: Engineering and Construction are scheduled between 2023 and 2036 (unsecured funding). The project cost is split between Snohomish County and Edmonds since half the project is in Esperance. COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023-2036 Planning/Study Engineering & $2,000,000 Administration Construction $13,441,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $15,441,000 * all or part of this project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts. 37 Packet Pg. 54 6.A.a CITY OF EDMONDS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT NAME: SR-104 @ 100t Ave. W ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,017,468 Intersection Improvements • __ L_ EDMONDS WAY PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Implement Westgate Circulation Access Plan, install mid -block pedestrian crossing along 100th Ave. W, and re -striping of 100th Ave. W with the potential addition of bike lanes. This project was identified in the SR-104 Completed Streets Corridor Analysis (completed in 2015). PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve access and safety at the intersection and improve non -motorized transportation safety. SCHEDULE: 2023-2036 (unsecured funding) COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023-2036 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration $150,000 Construction $867,468 1 % for Art TOTAL $1,017,468 38 Packet Pg. 55 CITY OF EDMONDS 6.A.a CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT NAME: SR-104 @ 76t Ave. W ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $3,017,000 Intersection Improvements No W J ---EnULOUD&16AY----------_LAI{EBALLJNGifRWAY____ -_-_ PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Add a 2 nd left turn lane along SR-104. This project was identified in the SR-104 Complete Street Corridor Analysis (completed in 2015). PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve access and safety at the intersection and improve non -motorized transportation safety. SCHEDULE: 2023-2036. The project cost would be split between Shoreline and Edmonds since half the intersection is in Shoreline. COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023-2036 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration $453,000 Construction $2,564,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $3,017,000 39 Packet Pg. 56 6.A.a CITY OF EDMONDS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT NAME: Olympic View Dr. @ 174"' St. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $610,000 SW Intersection Improvements PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Widen Olympic View Dr. to add a northbound left turn lane for 50' storage length. Shift the northbound lanes to the east to provide an acceleration lane for eastbound left turns. Install traffic signal to increase the LOS and reduce intersection delay. ROADWAY ROJECT PRIORITY in 2015 Transportation Plan: #13 PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve intersection efficiency and safety of drivers accessing either street. SCHEDULE: Engineering and Construction are scheduled between 2023 and 2036 (unsecured funding). COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023-2036 COST Planning/Study Engineering & $100,000 Administration Construction $510,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $610,000 40 Packet Pg. 57 6.A.a CITY OF EDMONDS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT NAME: Sunset Ave Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $3,000,000 from Bell St to Caspers St. mom 1N ♦,�� will ® 1MEN PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Provide a walkway on the west side of the street, facing waterfront (— 1/2 mile / more recent project). PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: To provide a safe and desirable walking route. SCHEDULE: Temporary improvements have been installed to evaluate the alignment of the proposed walkway. Additional improvements will be completed in 2017 (since construction isn't scheduled to occur until 2019 / 2020 when utility improvements are scheduled along this stretch). No grant funding has yet been secured for the construction phase). The design phase will be completed in 2017. COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 COST Planning/Study Engineering & $183,250 Administration Construction $2,595,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $183,250 $2,595,000 * all or part of this project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts. 41 Packet Pg. 58 6.A.a CITY OF EDMONDS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT NAME: Dayton St Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $75,000 between 7t" Ave. S and 8t" Ave. S MAIM Sr NO -ISLE FRA CES ANDERSONO3 W a � D• x � Q � 660 701 L DAYTON ST T-1 J w MAPLE Sr a-F7 F-F-FT k PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Dayton St. between 7t" Ave. 2015 Transportation Plan). Construct a missing link of sidewalk (approximately 250') on S and 8t" Ave. S (ranked #2 in Short Walkway Project list in PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: To provide a safe and desirable walking route. SCHEDULE: Engineering & Construction scheduled for 2020 (unsecured funding). COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration Construction $75,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $75,000 * all or part of this project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts. 42 Packet Pg. 59 6.A.a CITY OF EDMONDS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT NAME: 232 nd St. SW Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,305,000 from 100t" Ave. W to SR-104 EDM f?N DR urnv 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk along 232"d St. SW from 1 00Ave. W to SR-104. This project ranked #3 in the Long Walkway List of 2015 Transportation Plan. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This project would improve pedestrian safety. SCHEDULE: 2021-2022 (unsecured funding) COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration $200,000 Construction $1,105,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $200,000 $1,105,000 43 Packet Pg. 60 6.A.a CITY OF EDMONDS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT NAME: 238 St. SW Walkway from ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,400,000 100th Ave. W to 104th Ave. W and Stormwater Improvements d z2 ❑ ww 00 F Comm U _ vy Z LIBRARY 00 C R BASEBALL 23r FIELD 23 TO 42 OLD WOODWAY HIGH SCHOOL 236TH PL SW 3 HICKMAN PARK a 0 0 o z a a a 3 a J N Y ❑ 237TH PLSW 238 H 5 W bi a Q ❑ C 4 238TH ST SW O PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Installation of — 1,200' of sidewalk on the north side of 238 th St. SW from 100th Ave. W to 104th Ave. W. as well as sharrows. Stormwater improvements will also be incorporated into the project. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve pedestrian safety and create a safe pedestrian connection between 100th Ave. W and 104th Ave. W. SCHEDULE: Construction is scheduled to be completed in 2016 with remaining Federal documentation to be completed in 2017. Funding was secured for the completion of the design and construction phases (through Safe Routes to School program). Stormwater improvements are funded by the Stormwater Utility Fund 422. COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023-2036 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration Construction $12,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $12,000 all or part of this project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts 44 Packet Pg. 61 6.A.a CITY OF EDMONDS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT NAME: 236t" St. SW Walkway from ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $900,000 Edmonds Way to Madrona Elementary School 9700 MADRONA TRACK SCHOOL BALL FIELD A4N PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Construct an — 800' sidewalk on the south side of 236 th St. SW from SR-104 to Madrona Elementary as well as the addition of sharrows along that stretch. (This is only part of a stretch of Walkway project, which ranked #1 in the Long Walkway list in the 2009 Transportation Plan) PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: To provide a safe and desirable walking route near Madrona Elementary School and along 236t" St. SW. SCHEDULE: Construction is scheduled to be completed to start in Fall 2016 and be completed in early 2017. The project is funded through the Safe Routes to School Grant program, Fund 422 for stormwater improvements, and General Funds for the overlay of the stretch. COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 COST Planning/Study Engineering & Administration & ROW Construction $88,600 1 % for Art TOTAL $88,600 45 Packet Pg. 62 6.A.a CITY OF EDMONDS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT NAME: 236" St. SW Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,395,000 from Madrona Elementary to 97t" Ave. W R , 216TH STSW 3 iL PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk with curb and gutter along 236 nd St. SW from Madrona Elementary to 97t" Ave. W. This project ranked #4 in Long Walkway list of the 2015 Transportation Plan. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This project would improve pedestrian safety. SCHEDULE: 2020-2021 (unsecured funding) COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration $213,000 Construction $1,182,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $213,000 $1,182,000 46 Packet Pg. 63 6.A.a CITY OF EDMONDS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT NAME: 841Ave. W Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $585,000 from 238t" St. SW to 234t" ST. SW PARK� EDNpHDS +nrIRL GALL APTS � m � LL NORTH � CHRIST LHTHERAN CHURCH ,"',� HAVEN n MANOR w PART{ a &RIDE AI R m OFFICE 236:1 4 23603 SAFEWAY $ 23605 WH L HJIHG R 23601 SUNSET 23619 0 PnaL Long 6ROCK 711 R AURORA rota S MAR1 ETPLACE T s s H FA MILY RA NCAKE 8 U '7-77" I 738TH 5T SW co W SEOUL Q23821 PLAZA 2 23827 TRAVEL LODGE N PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk along 84 th Ave. W from 238 thSt .SW to 234 th St. SW, with curb and gutter. This project ranked #5 in the Long Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This project would improve pedestrian safety. SCHEDULE: Begin design in 2022 (unsecured funding) COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023-2036 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration $90,000 Construction $495,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $90,000 $495,000 47 Packet Pg. 64 6.A.a CITY OF EDMONDS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT NAME: 80" Ave. W Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,439,000 from 206t" St. SW to 212t" ST. SW 1 24 x0 I NI_ WIN 1 � x 1 � PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk along 80t Ave. W from 206 th St. SW to 212 th St. SW with curb and gutter. This project ranked #1 in Long Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: The improvements will improve non -motorized transportation safety. SCHEDULE: 2020-2022 (funding unsecured). A Pedestrian and Bicycle Program grant to fund the design phase was submitted in May 2016 (response scheduled for Spring 2017). COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration & ROW $210,000 Construction $1,229,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $210,000 $1,229,000 48 Packet Pg. 65 6.A.a CITY OF EDMONDS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT NAME: 2" Ave. S Walkway from ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $30,000 James St. to Main St. :4 4u '0 NG Xx 0 i1 * all or part of this project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts 4 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 2nd Ave. S between Main St. 2015 Transportation Plan). Construct a missing link of sidewalk (approximately 100') on and James St. (Ranked #2 in Short Walkway Project list in PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: To provide a safe and desirable walking route. SCHEDULE: 2020 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration Construction $30,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $30,000 49 Packet Pg. 66 6.A.a CITY OF EDMONDS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT NAME: Maplewood Dr. Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,591,000 from Main St. to 200th St. SW PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Construct sidewalk on Maplewood Dr. from Main St. to 200t St. SV\ (- 2,700'). A sidewalk currently exists on 200th St. SW from Main St. to 76th Ave. W, adjacent to Maplewood Elementary School (rated #22 in the Long Walkway list of the 2015 Transportation Plan). PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Create pedestrian connection between Maplewood Elementary School on 200th St. SW and Main St., by encouraging kids to use non -motorized transportation to walk to / from school. SCHEDULE: Engineering scheduled for 2020 and construction in 2022 (funding unsecured). A grant application through Safe Routes to School Program was submitted in May 2016 for design funding (response scheduled for Spring 2017). COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Planning/Study Engineering & $230,000 Administration Construction $681,000 $680,0( 1 % for Art TOTAL $230,000 $681,000 $680,01 * all or part of this project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts. 50 Packet Pg. 67 6.A.a CITY OF EDMONDS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT NAME: 95`n PI. W Walkway from ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $550,000 224" ST. SW to 220t" St. SW PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk along 95 th PI. W from 224 th ST. SW to 220th ST. SW, with curb and gutter. This project ranked #9 in the Long Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This project would improve pedestrian safety. SCHEDULE: Engineering scheduled for 2020 and construction in 2021 (funding unsecured). A TIB grant application was submitted in August 2016 to fund this project (response scheduled for November 2016). COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023-2036 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration $105,000 Construction $445,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $105,000 $445,000 51 Packet Pg. 68 6.A.a CITY OF EDMONDS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT NAME: 21 8thSt. SW Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,305,000 from 76t" Ave. W to 84t" Ave. W ■= I��N= _' ■ ■■= =NI ■ii Ila INS MEN RANT Esieos U ` N ALT N CENT� PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk along 218t St. SW from 76t Ave. W to 84 th Ave. W with curb and gutter. This project ranked #2 in Long Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: The improvements will improve pedestrian safety. SCHEDULE: 2021-2022 (unsecured funding) COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration & ROW $200,000 Construction $1,105,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $200,000 $1,105,000 52 Packet Pg. 69 6.A.a CITY OF EDMONDS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT NAME: Walnut St. Walkway from Su ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $105,000 Ave. S to 4t" Ave. S ARTS W ENTER a Z UNDOW NE N ALDER ALDER ST 346 1 414 412 410 1 arking 5 5 UJ a o SOUND VIEW o: HOWELL WAY W a x v BAN r 409 530Pancak 407 540 Hausm 403 405 546 o 401 w a DAYTON ST OLD MILLTOWN MAPLE ST TRIC fl ALDER ST N W aFBECKWT'S z K WALNUT Sr GREGORY e H 525 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Construct a missing link of sidewalk (approximately 350') on Walnut St. between 3rd Ave. S and 4t" Ave. S (ranked #3 in Short Walkway Project list in 2015 Transportation Plan). PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: To provide a safe and desirable walking route. SCHEDULE: Engineering & Construction scheduled for 2020 (unsecured funding). COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration $10,000 Construction $95,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $105,000 all or part of this project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts 53 Packet Pg. 70 6.A.a CITY OF EDMONDS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT NAME: 216 St. SW Walkway from ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $157,000 Hwy. 99 to 72nd Ave. W 21400 f JJ 7200 B&M PARK & RIDE CONS STEV h S w 21d10 21408 MAFJDR W 21401 21412 04 AO �n W N W # r < 21431 M DON LD' SA ZI 2150 n STEVEN 21500 2A5�5 COURT AEGIS 21558 t 21527 j VALUE j VILLA 216TH ST SW / 216TH 120 :VEHS 21600 I 21619 G� - FILION KRUGER{y CLINIC PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install 150' sidewalk on north side of 216 thSt. SW from Hwy. 99 to 72nd Ave. W (completing a missing link on north side of stretch). This project ranked #4 in the Short Walkway List (from 2015 Transportation Plan). PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: To provide a safe and desirable walking route. SCHEDULE: Engineering & Construction scheduled for 2020 (unsecured funding). COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration $30,000 Construction $127,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $157,000 * all or part of this project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts 54 Packet Pg. 71 6.A.a CITY OF EDMONDS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT NAME: 238 St. SW Walkway from ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $491,000 Hwy. 99 to SR-104 ■ IIIN .�il■I - - PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Ranked #12 in Long Walkway list from 2015 Transportation Plan. Install 5' sidewalk on the north side of 238t" St. SW. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve pedestrian safety along that stretch and creating safe pedestrian connection between Hwy. 99 and 76t" Ave. W. SCHEDULE: The design phase will be completed in 2016. Construction will be completed in 2017. A TIB grant was secured to fund the design and construction phases. COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023-2036 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration Construction $413,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $413,000 * all or part of this project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts. 55 Packet Pg. 72 6.A.a CITY OF EDMONDS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT NAME: 15 St. SW Walkway from 8 ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $200,000 Ave. S to 9th Ave. S r2, 1502 T`rG 's y I �1452ir 1457 � 98- 982 va1� 9825 qq ' 9906 9832 226DS 98 980 226TH PL S 9920 f 9 w 7 Q 9916 H spyy 22515 0, o, it it o� a� I L Nil a� a 9826 22805 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Add missing sidewalk link along 15t St. SW from 8 Ave. S to 9t Ave S PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve pedestrian safety along that stretch and providing pedestrian connection from 9th Ave. S. SCHEDULE: The design and construction phases will be completed in 2017. COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration 20,000 Construction $180,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $200,000 all or part of this project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts. 56 Packet Pg. 73 6.A.a CITY OF EDMONDS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT NAME: Elm Way Walkway from ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $789,000 8t" Ave. S to 9t" Ave. S .1 f�� f W Of PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk along Elm Way from 8 th Ave. S to 9t Ave. S. This project ranked #6 in the Short Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan. PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: This project would improve pedestrian safety. SCHEDULE: 2020-2021 (funding unsecured). A Safe Routes to School grant application was submitted in May 2016 to fund the design and construction phases of this project (response scheduled for Spring 2017. COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration $156,000 Construction $633,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $156,000 $633,000 57 Packet Pg. 74 6.A.a CITY OF EDMONDS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT NAME: Minor Sidewalk Program ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: varies PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Complete missing sidewalk along short segments throughout the City. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve pedestrian safety. SCHEDULE: annual program COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration & ROW $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 Construction $45,000 $45,000 $45,000 $45,000 $45,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 58 Packet Pg. 75 6.A.a CITY OF EDMONDS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT NAME: 191th St. SW Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $630,000 from 80t" Ave. W to 76t" Ave. W ►z z a 192ND PL 5W PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk along 191th St. SW from 80t Ave. W to 76t Ave., with curb and gutter. This project ranked #8 in Long Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This project would improve pedestrian safety. SCHEDULE: 2023-2036 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023-2036 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration $90,000 Construction $540,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $630,000 59 Packet Pg. 76 6.A.a CITY OF EDMONDS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT NAME: 104 th Ave. W Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $990,000 from 238t" St. SW to 106t" Ave. W PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk along 104 th Ave. W from 238t ST. SW to 106t Ave. W, with curb and gutter. This project ranked #10 in the Long Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This project would improve pedestrian safety. SCHEDULE: 2023-2036 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023-2036 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration $150,000 Construction $840,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $990,000 60 Packet Pg. 77 6.A.a CITY OF EDMONDS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT NAME: 801h Ave. W Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $315,000 from 218t" St. SW to 220t" St. SW "4 7 cn n STEVE Golden n , HEAL Leaves i TEVENS A K — LEGEND xESTATES F dff J' 218TH ST SW ■ 7a n Ion M 219TH 5T SW E 16 or � � m u� —^-------�TH ST --- — — — — — ----—2r-r--r SW_ PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk along 80t Ave. W from 218t ST. SW to 220t ST. SW, with curb and gutter. This project ranked #7 in the Short Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This project would improve pedestrian safety. SCHEDULE: 2023-2036 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023-2036 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration $55,000 Construction $260,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $315,000 61 Packet Pg. 78 6.A.a CITY OF EDMONDS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT NAME: 841Ave. W Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $315,000 from 188th St. SW to 186th St. SW Jr SW ir d 0 F b A MMI= 0 186TH 5T W m i -d6 WF-` ` ,' W a r■ 18 TH 5 5W ■ 0 1 = il- 188TH 5T SW -F i ~■ '� ��.r� .w ' OIL ' , W a 111 _ L r 11 - i ' ■ J r oar r I ;FAVRFW ! 111 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk along 84 th Ave. W from 188 th St. SW to 186 th St. SW., with curb and gutter. This project ranked #5 in Short Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This project would improve pedestrian safety. SCHEDULE: 2023-2036 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023-2036 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration $60,000 Construction $255,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $315,000 62 Packet Pg. 79 6.A.a CITY OF EDMONDS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT NAME: 236" St. SW Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $765,000 from Hwy 99 to 76t" Ave. W rmti.rl . L) i ■ - ■ _I J 'E i 1 FFICE C N 322s •D• � t � ■ � m ' i PARK ■ , EDNSAL A L � � ■ Eu ■ ■ E' 1 APTS Fj . �L61 1 'a m LL NORTH = y CH RIST LU TH E RAN CH U RCH ° ry HAVEN MANOR W m PARK & RIDE L R a , — I 236TH�IN OFFICE 2365 L KJIHG2307 4N 03 ■II E,:SAFE 2307 • ■ . PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk along 236t St. SW from Hwy 99 to 76t Ave. W. This project ranked #11 in Long Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This project would improve pedestrian safety. SCHEDULE: 2023-2036 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023-2036 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration $115,000 Construction $650,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $765,000 63 Packet Pg. 80 6.A.a CITY OF EDMONDS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT NAME: 238thSt. SW Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,170,000 from Hwy 99 to 76t" Ave. W L—LLJ PARK 4ANII FNA LN EOMONOSAPTS NJ O661 CHRIST LUTHE RAH CHURCH 0vPARKN) L & RIDE OFFICEa ■ 7 ■ I 2 r TH T � � a 23667 LY 23663 SAFEWAY , I • , , ■ ■ 23665 N4K L KJIHG FC,� I ' ■ ■ SUNSET 23667 L • . 23679 O ' + p1-A-ILLO.A. Q S BROOK ■ � R AURORA 101�� - ` S MARKETPLACE T • _ I, FA ILVPANCAKE p qL . i V 23$TH 5T 5W • ` ` , , IL ` ■ "' seouL ■ ■ ■ MEN Q 23821 PLAZA ' ► , `■ ■ S 2 11 ■ ■■ ■ ■ 23827 ' ' * . • . TRAVEL ` ` ■ ST. FRANRANCIS -M IS ISON TA Ca TIM MOTEL . . . - ■1,` 2391 ■ 1� ■ ■ WHSE K& E MOTEL ■ ■ ■ �' 11 RVII I F 11 ■ ■ ' ■ / J 1-� PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk along 238t St. SW from Hwy. 99 to 76t Ave. W This project ranked #12 in Long Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This project would improve pedestrian safety. SCHEDULE: 2023-2036 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023-2036 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration $175,000 Construction $995,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $1,170,000 64 Packet Pg. 81 6.A.a CITY OF EDMONDS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT NAME: 80t Ave. W / 180t St. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,350,000 SW Walkway from 188" St. SW to OVD PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk along 80th Ave. W from 188 th St. SW to OVD. This project ranked #13 in Long Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This project would improve pedestrian safety. SCHEDULE: 2023-2036 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023-2036 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration $270,000 Construction $1,080,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $1,350,000 65 Packet Pg. 82 6.A.a CITY OF EDMONDS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT NAME: 189t PI. SW Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $585,000 from 80t" Ave. W to 76t" Ave. W PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk along 189t PI. SW from 80th Ave. W to 76 th Ave. W. This project ranked #14 in Long Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This project would improve pedestrian safety. SCHEDULE: 2023-2036 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023-2036 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration $115,000 Construction $470,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $585,000 66 Packet Pg. 83 6.A.a CITY OF EDMONDS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT NAME: Ferry Storage ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $357,000 Improvements from Pine St. Dayton St. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Modify existing lane channelization on SR104 to add vehicle storage for ferry users. PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Reduce conflicts between ferry storage and access to local driveways. SCHEDULE: 2020 (unsecured funding) COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration $50,000 Construction $307,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $357,000 67 Packet Pg. 84 6.A.a CITY OF EDMONDS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT NAME: Trackside Warning System ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $350,000 @ Dayton and Main St. RR Crossing ■ PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install Trackside Warning System @ Dayton and Main St. Railroad Crossings. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Reduce noise from train horns at both intersections. SCHEDULE: Construction is scheduled to be completed by the end of 2016, with final items to be completed in 2017. COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration Construction $10,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $10,000 * all or part of this project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts. 68 Packet Pg. 85 6.A.a r c a� E a� O L Q E CFP 76 U c tc d N a� STORMWATER .Q U N N O N ti O N d N O Q O L CL r CD CD r N N O N ti O N a U c m E t v r r Q ;.o c a� E t v ca Q 69 Packet Pg. 86 6.A.a r c a� E a� O L Q E 76 .Q R U c tc d N a� v m U- 76 r .Q cv U N N O N ti O N d N O Q O L CL r CD CD r N N O N ti O N a U- U c m E t v m r r Q ;.o c a� E t v ca Q 70 Packet Pg. 87 City of Edmonds Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) Stormwater Projects (2017-2022) 6.A.a Project Name Purpose Grant Opportunity Grant/Date Current Project Phase (2017-2022) Total Cost Revenue Source 2017 2019 2019 2020 2021 2022 Dayton St and Hwy 104 Drainage Add lift station and other new infrastructure to reduce $0 (Federal or State secured) Improvements. intersection flooding. Design $0 (Federal or State unsecured) $1,950,000 (Debt/Stormwater Fees) $1,900,000 $50,000 $1,950,000 Total $1,900,000 $50,000 Willow Creek/Daylighting Daylight channel to allow better connnectivity with the Puget RCO SRF Grant $0 (Federal or State secured) Sound to benefit fish and reduce flooding. Possible Grant/TBD Study $4,200,000 (Federal or State unsecured) $225,000 $225,000 $1,800,000 $1,950,000 $1,420,000 (Debt/Stormwater) $75,000 $75,000 $600,000 $650,000 $20,( $5,620,000 Total $300,000 $300,000 $2,400,000 $2,600,000 $20,( Perrinville Creek High Flow Find solution to high peak stream flows caused by excessive Ecology Grant $510,375 (Federal or State secured) $5101,375 Reduction/Management Project - stormwater runoff that erodes the stream, causes flooding Possible Grant/TBD Desiqn $1,087,500 (Federal or State unsecured) $337,500 $375,000 $375,000 Seaview Park Infiltration Facility and has negative impacts on aquatic habitat. $582,625 (Debt/Stormwater Fees) $170,125 $112,500 $125,000 $125,000 $50,( $2,180,500 Total $680,500 $450,000 $500,000 $500,000 $50,( Total CFPJ $9,750,500 1 Annual CFP Totals $2,880,500 1 $800,000 1 $2,900,000 1 $3,100,000 1 $0 70,000 Revenue Summary by Year Totals Source 2017 1 2018 1 2019 1 2020 1 2021 2022 $510,375 Total Federal& State(Secured) $510,375 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,287,500 oa Federal ae (Unsecured) $225,000 $562,500 $2,175,000 $2,325,000 $0 $3,952,625 Debt/ ,,jtormwater Feesl $2,145,125 $237,5001 $725,0001 $775,000 $0 $70,( 71 Packet Pg. 88 6.A.a r c a� E a� O L Q E 76 .Q R U c tc d N a� v m U- 76 r .Q cv U N N O N ti O N d N O Q O L CL r CD CD r N N O N ti O N a U- U c m E t v m r r Q ;.o c a� E t v ca Q 72 Packet Pg. 89 CITY OF EDMONDS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN DESCRIPTION 6.A.a PROJECT NAME: Dayton St and Hwy 104 ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $2,227,700 Drainage Improvements 9@ 31 -a i i. $p 200 GQ !Tqk 146 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Add lift station in the Beach Place parking lot and other new infrastructure. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: To reduce flooding at the intersection of Dayton St and State Hwy 104. SCHEDULE: 2017-2019 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Planning/Study Eng. & Admin. $100,000 Construction $1,800,000 $50,000 1% for Art $10,000 TOTAL $1,900,000 $50,000 73 Packet Pg. 90 CITY OF EDMONDS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN DESCRIPTION PROJECT NAME: Willow Creek Daylighting ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $5,825,000 Edmonds Marsh as seen from the viewing platform. Previously restored section of Willow Creek. Source: www.unocaledmonds.info/clean-U/ ag llery_php PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Building on the studies completed in 2013 and 2015 that assessed the feasibility of daylighting the Willow Creek channel, this project will likely construct a new tide gate and 1,100 linear ft of new creek channel lined with an impermeable membrane. Funds will be used for design and construction but exact breakdown cannot be assessed at this time. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: The daylighting of Willow Creek will help reverse the negative impacts to Willow Creek and Edmonds Marsh that occurred when Willow Creek was piped in the early 1960s. This project will provide habitat for salmonids, including rearing of juvenile Chinook. This project, along with its companion CIP projects "Edmonds Marsh Channel Improvements" and "Dayton Street Pump Station," will also help reduce the flooding problem at the intersection of SR-104 and Dayton Street. SCHEDULE: 2017-2025 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Planning/Study Eng. & Admin. $459,278 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 Construction 1 % for Art TOTAL $459,278 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 74 Packet Pg. 91 CITY OF EDMONDS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN DESCRIPTION 6.A.a PROJECT NAME: Perrinville Creek High Flow ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $2,532,950 Reduction/Management Project Talhot Frederick a C n m 1 4t 185th 00 M U 87th 04 1 AQ7{L 172n w t 73 d �0 a Perrinville d4 Creek th 78th 77th' 1 78th -w 1 Oth m 181s to m a �RRfL n n t Perrinville Creek Channel illustrating the channel incision that will be addressed by restoration. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A flow reduction study for the Perrinville Creek basin was completed in 2014. This study recommended a number of flow control and water quality projects to improve the conditions in Perrinville Creek. The City applied for and won a grant from the Department of Ecology for $633,750 to design and construct a stormwater infiltration facility in Seaview Park. The 2017 budget is for that facility. The dollars allocated in the out years are to implement additional water quality and flow control projects in the Perrinville Creek basin as recommended by the Flow Reduction Study. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Urbanization of the Perrinville Creek Basin has increased flows in the creek, incision of the creek, and sedimentation in the low -gradient downstream reaches of the creek. Before any habitat improvements can be implemented, the flows must be controlled or these improvements will be washed away. SCHEDULE: 2017-2022 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 COST Planning/Study Eng. & Admin. $35,000 $50,000 50000 50000 $50,000 $50,000 Construction $944,000 $400,000 $450,000 $450000 1% for Art $3,950 $1,125 $1,250 $1,250 TOTAL $982,950 $451,125 $501,250 $501,250 $50,000 $50,000 75 Packet Pg. 92 6.A.b CITY OF EDMONDS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM U~� 2017-2022 St. l89 0 P-3 %�p DRAFT Packet Pg. 93 6.A.b Q Packet Pg. 94 6.A.b CITY OF EDMONDS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (2017-2022) Table of Contents GENERAL 016 Building Maintenance Public Works 7 112 Transportation Public Works 9 113 Multimodal Transportation Community Services 12 125 Capital Projects Fund Parks & Recreation/ Public Works 13 126 Special Capital / Parks Acquisition Parks & Recreation/ Public Works 15 129 Special Projects Parks & Recreation 17 132 Parks Construction (Grant Funding) Parks & Recreation 18 421 Water Projects Public Works 20 422 Storm Projects Public Works 21 423 Sewer Projects Public Works 23 423.76 Waste Water Treatment Plant Public Works 25 PARKS — PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS Capital Parks & Recreation/ 125 Projects Fund Public Works 29 Special Capital / Parks & Recreation/ 126 Parks Acquisition Public Works 63 Parks Construction 132 (Grant Funding) Parks & Recreation 66 Packet Pg. 95 6.A.b Q Packet Pg. 96 6.A.b Cip GENERAL CD 0) ui r N N O N ti O N d U N r C d E t V O r r Q C N E t V R Q Packet Pg. 97 6.A.b Q Packet Pg. 98 lel!deo ZZOZ-LOZ posodoad ay; uo 6u!JeOH ollgnd : 6690 ZZOZ-LOZ d13 :Z;uauayoePv :}u8wt4Oe;}d C L N 01 C O i C a d N � E C_ O M E � r Y � Q a � C U LL N 0000000000000000000000000000000000 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O V3 V30 V30 0 0 0 0000000000000000000 0 0 0 0 0 V) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00000 N C O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O CD O O O O C �y O N C c)c)c) NNLO LOOOLOOOOOrOLOLOCOLOOLOLOLnLoC)0 �rNNNN V LO V MMNr b9r NNO�O) V N O r 00000 V MM NLOL000 C)W90OLOOL000C)C)0 NLO NLON VI CM N CDO F r V3 V) V3 V3 V3 V) V3 V3 V3 V3 V3 V3 V3 V3 V3 N V) co V) V3 V3 N V) V) V3 V) V3 V3 M 619 V3 V3 03 V3 V3 V3 V3 613,613, V3 V3 V) V3 V3 V3 V3 V3 V3 V3 V3 V) O N O O O O O O O O O O O N � N O_ N � Lci � LLOO O V) V> V) Vi V) V) N V3 0 0 O 00 O O 0 O O O O O O 00 O O O O O O O O O 000 O O O O O O O O O O O O 00 O O O r LO LO O LO O LO O LO LO O LO O Ln LO CD N V) V) Cl) V) N N N N N O N O N V3 613,613, V3 N V3 V3 V3 N V3 V) V) O O O O O O O O O O O O 00 O 00 00 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O LO LO LO LO O Ln LO O O O LO LO LO O_ O_ 0 N C. 6'3 CO V) V) V) N V) N V) 613 N V) N V) V) V) V) O_ V) N V) V) V) V) N V) N V3 O O 00 C O O 000 O O O O O O 00 O O O O 0 O O co O O O O 0 O O 0 O O 0 O O 0 O O 00000 O O O O O O O O C 01 LO LO LO LO W) W) CD O W) W) CD O O Ln O LO O O LO r V) V) r V) V) V) N V) N N LO N N N V) p N 63 V) 63 N � 63 � 613 63 V3 V) V3 63 000 O 00 0 0000 000 000 O o0 00o O 00 000 000 0 0 0o 00 O 0 o000 0000 000 000 000 000 0 00 00 00o 000 O 0 o0 00 0p r Ln 0 V3�N 0 Ln N Ln Ln V)V) Ln V) LO NN�M 0 0 0 00 V)LO 0 Ln V) LO CO Ln LO �V) 0 co 0 0 It�LO� Ln 0 0 O 0 �N 0 O V) V) V) V) V) V) V) V) V) V) V) V) V) V) V) V) V) 6r V) N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O CD O O h O O LO O LO O O O Ln O LO O N � � N O O O O O O O CD M � N V� N O N N V) V V3 V3 V) W a LL U w cu m C 0 E a c C 0) N E U a� 0) (0 0)0) 07 a) _ C E 0) gC w 0) c Q c_ w (DE m coicco -a) E .�+ a E E c6 N E E 0) a) c6 o o c O. m � C as O L) f6 o f6 C 0) a 0 a' Ol c0,7 ` O1 C ma°i U o Lo N Cn m 0) a E O. �'� 0) Em t0 a E o•E N N E 0) •C Ca O_ y N 0 E of O. m 3 C 'O 0 � °' C °'cyi� C O c�i`o 'O p 0) � �,t0 co' Q O U 0 >, '� t0 0) a'LL N LO C 'O Q >' O. �� U G...+ t0 0) � C N� y a't0 C C � t0 00 O. Q O O N 7 � O X a� N c6 �aaa Oa' N�'C o ar Cy O. a' m E 0) 111 O Lo O O. N a CU a c a' 0) 0) '0 O.O o. U W LL E ii O.O. m _O U E N C O C O f6 t0 a .0+ 0) _O U C C 7 a. y 07 .. C a' 0) m 0) O 0) t0 O 'O C 0) c6 U 0) N y N 0) y 0) 0) y y 0) y y a a `o U `m N X c N o X N X E Q N > o� O o c G o 0 F> — a� °' 0 c6 O a'm O. m 0 0. E2 c6 o oL c m U O Q- C O 'C O. 'C O U C 0 LL O 7 7 7 T 7 m 3 o o W a' W W mS U) w LLUUO W a' om 0)LL a(� O. �= c N 0) 1: 0) c6C o c6 U o O �y ' Eyd O c 0 `o 0 0 0 O C� Q c N E C C C C C C C C C '''''' C C C C C C '-_c-0 C .- N o 'O ° `g N 'L 0 a'U•- �m 7 C U V O 0) .� coa�U2UU r- cD Lp cD cD r_ r_ r_ o N CoC;6 o o N N a0. X 0-'CF Q m 0 > U > U > > U U > c�. U Z > 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 7 C '- > O O Q U N O O LO 9k 9k 9k 9k 9k 9k 9k 9k 9k W N "O N O to N N N N N N O y U o 00000000 C U U C C U U C C U U C C U U C C U U C C U U C C U U C C U m C N U X W W O> a 2 0) U) d aL a C C O 0. C C O O C C O O C C O O C C O O N C c0 N c0 O N N N N N N U) N c6 X W W a 0000000000000000� E Z_______ m m m m m m y_> m `Lo — CL a �' � �161616-cmmm w 333333 EE O S S S S S S S a O O O C (n yZ' Z' Z' o 0 0 0 0 0� 0 0 o 0) Q-0-0-0-0-0-0-0 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) O-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-O 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) E T T T T T T T TU U U s 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) Cp N 6 6 6 6 6 6 y �Lu V) N d O C Q Q C C Q Q C C Q Q C C Q Q C C Q Q C C Q Q C C Q Q C C Q Q C N Q 0 != != U 0 != != 0 0 != != 0 0 != != 0 0 m m W W m V) W LL L L LL LL L L LL LL L L LL LL L L LL LL L L LL LL i.� J J J J lel!deo ZZOZ-LOZ posodoad ay; uo 6u!JeOH ollgnd : 6690 ZZOZ-LOZ d13 :Z;uauayoePv :}u8wt4Oe;}d 0000000000 O O 0000000 O O O O O 619.0 b9 O N � V7 V7 V7 V7 V7 O O O CD O O O Oo LO e CD o O O O O CD O O CD 0 O O O N 64 V7 N V7 V7 O O O O O O O O L00 N � 0 coo b9 b9 o o O O O O CD O O CD 0 O T Ld CT LO N N m V7 V) V7 O O O O O O O O O O O O O N 6 O O coo b9 b9 6-1 O O O O O O LO O N CD O Ln ea c o c a) U C U U N fA C p_ c C _ N m N o U m c'mm m 2U �w£2U �a m� cam a) m c m p O c _ cu c'm� ac_ c-cu cu a) CO �aV�� £ aaiU af d a) coU M 0 c U fq� EL a5 C U T> T T w y 5 a)07wcococ a) y y M M M M M M 'c 'c U�d dddddU)U) 0 O tn cq N H O O LO w N09 O O O O 0) O fl9 O O N V! fl9 O O 00 V! O O Ln T N9 u9 00 00000000 O V> 0 fA fA fA fA fA fA fA N M O O N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 � O O O O V O O O 0 N O 000 O O O O O O O O V� CD O CD O fn 09. 09. 09. V� V� V� O n O 0 N N M M N � V)) V 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O Vi O O fn fn O V) di di di N 6�, O cr) L00 cr) O C14 O N O O O O O O O O O O O O fA 0 0 fA fA fA fA fA fA fA O O co LO N � V) V) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cl Cl Cl Cl O d� O O fn fn O V) di di di 00 f.. LOCr) O 0 C14 O61� N O O O O O O O O O O O O N V900 O Vi Vi Vi Vi Vi Vi V) U� LO N 619 V> N N t N O to La O O m V ]LL LL @ C� O•- LL L Lp mm a) U� W U j O N y y O 'per n c O c O LODE W fn= 7LL d c@ E w w c c LL U <Q U W 0 0 N O@ m C m ay7 W '� 0 '� «: i� i� @ m O c E (n y c w O O O ca a LLLL� O = a N wm-UUUU3: O 3: 3:73: O O Oa N 0 0 F E lel!deo ZZOZ-LOZ posodoad ay; uo 6u!JeOH ollgnd : 6690 ZZOZ-LOZ d13 :Z;uauayoePv :}u8wt4Oe;}d O O V3 0 O M 0 u7 0 0 O O 0 0 O O 0 0 O O 0 0 O O 0 0 O O 0 0 V3 0 0 0 0 � LOMOMS 0 0 0 0 (O(O(O 0 0 0 0 1O7MM 0 0 O 0 N tam 1'. M 0MM tO(0 0 0 N&-�tR(0 N O)M O M W M N N M MtotOr M M "I.M 0 co 0 0 C O 00 00 000000 O M 0000 0 LO N 00 C) I- 0 M M 010 V3 V3 V3 V3 M V3 O O O (O O O C,O O O O(O(O O O C,O O O 0 O O C,O O O It O O C,O O O O O C,O O O CD (- V3 Oh(- co O W. O (- 00 to V3 coM co 6'.* to co (ON V3 M V r V3 O O O M�2 V3 O O O O O O c l7 V3(A O O O O O O (D V3(ACD O O O O O O M V3��� O O O O O O h 0 O O O V3 0 (MD O 0 10 M O O � V3 V3 V3 M 0 O h O O O N V3 M V9 III>' >t, III N C E N C E > a o w c 0 w E° E E N u N M > M d 0) O 0) a) 0 M O O N E (D 0`) a) E U= N 2 E>>> 0 aOi E> E 7 p C W E N C C O O 2 Q 2 0) D- C N 2 >O M LO U) N `EEO 0) O '5EEE—aEO0 C La y w C) 0 O(n E o m c U E 10 N C> c N N (n O 0 N O N > M D 0> O a m L i >> > N E2 N N C E L N Lo C U E2 N@ -> O y U v N 00 C OM) o L 05 'E � E N2 > (O (n (n U) U) _ U) M O U O N >` (n 3 a n L L N (O .L-. +L.+ a w' a0 @ Nr (n (n (n LL (D M (V N N(O N N t1.. M N O Ud a`(n (n (n(naMN(n N16�'Udcn� TMMOOO (n L_ L N N .L... Lo C L (6Nd'Q'd'CN N N 04 (DK N 1- 2 (n N 2 2 2 (n (n (n Ci N O O (O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O V3 00000 00000 N O 00(O(ON O O (O O 00(O O O 0 M O O 0 LO(O O O 1-M O O O O O MS O O M00 O O O O O W O",N l 0( 0 Ih 1� h V3 0 MfA CO MM V3M V V3V CO C- V3M� CO 70 CO ONN h lO (O V3(O (O CO N co (O (O N 613 ;3 � � ;3 V3 V3 V3 ;; V3 . ;3 V3 V) V3 V3 C.0 0 O 0 0 c 0 C O 00 00 co O 0 0 _ V3 _ V3 V3 V3 O O O N 613 O O N O V3 O O O) N V3 O O O N 613 O O O N(MO 613 O O O O Cl) (0ON 613 V3 O O 0 613 O O (O 7 613 0 O 0 � O O O C) O O 10 M I h O C) O co O C)O O O O O O M O O O Cl O O 10 I h 0 M O ClO O O O O CD O O (O O M O O O 0 O O O U')O O O O O 0 0 0 O C. ( O 10 V3 N V3 N V3 N V3 V3 V3 V3 �� V3 N V3 V3 10 V3 V3 N V3 V3 O O N V3 0 O N V3 C:, O 1Lo (A O O 1Lo V3 O 1O N M O C)O O N00 C. (D O O O M O C)O O C)O O O 10O O O C)O O O O O W 040N CD C)O M 10 00 V3 V3 OD V3 V V3 N N V3 V3 M V3 V3 1� V3 U) (D V3 O 0 O V O O O C. O O 1 O Cl) 10 C. O 0 C. O 0 0 N 1- 00 L 0( D N 1- U) O O C)0lo M V3 M (D V3 N V3 1P3) V V3 T V3 00 V3 � � 1>11,11"t, xxxxx Ix I I I x C E N w in o� @ 'a 3 Y a > @ NY > @ a 0 (n U) > (n L N O fn N 3� @_O !A N 0) C m U) �L mNO�>d)O -C w� !cu U (n �L a > y O C O N��(n (n 00 .a (n O>� O o O >M >N y (n L ) N W >@ W L== N.L.. 0 M C 07 L @ O M > E aCL m 0> 0) a a y @ (n (n N 7 O O E U O M E. N N y @ E E M Q), LL O O0)fn E-o LL VJa 0)L O > C(n C> m O E C O 0)L M mU >Op (pa�� M00 W 2M� ... Nco E(r°Q >, @�L 3(n ijQ Ng mw 9U) E -o a.-. L 2 m Y h O E E E N N E M f0 E O7 E L O co N 3 W 00 E OL y m E O O O O O E E U E E C U) M E y@ Y OL OL U Y C a ,0 E IWO O Q (n cn (n to (n (n cn Lj w o ,e a ` N a U Co in 0) in N N -� C.N W (D CO .L.. .L... "OM @OOD aa=pL W O N N N N W W N N � N N C5 W M a a N � 2 m a > lel!deo ZZOZ-LOZ posodoad ay; uo 6u!JeOH ollgnd : 6690 ZZOZ-LOZ d13 :Z;uauayoePv :}u8wt4Oe;}d O cc CA X U O C1 U C1 m m m F� H lL Li F� 900000 0 0 0 0 rnOo0o0 0 0 C 0 N N M LOO - LOO CV W N r CM L0O V) N V3 N V3 O O N V3 V3 V) V3 V) � V) N N O O O co 0 C IO IO��N O O O O 0 0 :lO O O O O 0 0 00M r0 O O O N V! O O N N Vf C. O O N es. 0 O O O N V3 V3 V3 V3 V) V! V3 O to o 0 0 0 O O O O O CD 0 O 0 0 08 O O 0 O O 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O N 0) O (D O O � 0 O O 0 0 M C O r o O L O L O N O N 0 O p (D N r O ul (A V3 V3 N V) V3 V) V3 (A V3 40(.1) V) C1 r 0 O O 000000 0 0 0 O O IO 0 0 O O COr O O o O O N N O O O 04 0 O o O p 7 N 1- M LO V> N V3 V3 V3 V3 V3 V3 V! M 0 O O 0 0 O O 0 0 O O O O O O O O 0 O 00 (MD LOO LOO W T L0O N N O O N r Cl) V) V3 V3 V3 V3 (A'V3 V3 V3 (AN co 0 c o 00 0 0 00 0 O O L n 0 (P) O r N (O M co r 0 O o O Co O O O O O CD O O O O O O O 0 O 0 N O O O N M W L O (D O O O O O O O O O O O �. r r 0 M- 0 m O (D CO N V) O (D O r mN c o r r � 0 O W N O co O r u 7 O N N 0 N 0 (D O O O O (ACO r N r r V3 co V3 V) V) V) V3 V3 V) (AN V3 V) V3 cs V3 V3 - V3 V3 (A V) 0 0 O O C. 0 o O C. o 0 N o CO L O N 0 CD O No 0 0 O V N D) m (n r C. 0 r 0 O O O O 0 00 0 00 0 W 0 00 o V) 0 0) OOOOOr m C)O CD O CD O W r �Co(Dr (Da 00 V O 0 O V' "tNO 0000 O O O 0 GOON o0o Coo O O 0 O E V3 C0 0N (A OO W 00 V3 N V) V3 V3 V3 (AN V3 r N 0N V3 0N N V3 V3 V3 co N V) V3 LO V) V3 W LO N N N) V3 V3 V3 V3 V3 (A W c ^ L N N N C N C O) D N > ¢ 0) Cl) mC m E E m E E t Q m V Co Ewo > ° ° ° E (� x o� MI.. @ v- N E E - E c c o 2� 0 10 6 6 y > > @ 01 N a L j E 0 0 U U 0 U ` U 0 > y 0 L O) L Q) c E O O C (O N 2 0) 0) 0) � m c 0 �¢ a' o w w @ y LL a`CL Or E > E O _ H V' o O o NUJo L`.C. VL co E (D E E@@ N E E0 ) C C@ E O C C C j N @ ww 0O NE O cg r N@O' 0E 7 NCE ¢¢07O oo o aN SEmC a a co a E acm(n H@ dN> 1>U) m DN E E NmC CEQ:m N 0-a20y6 6 m °°3DE Ey oDE w_a N Cn N > y H" Q ¢ m N ?j m co "m0 L27 U N '0 '0 U (� 0) co UU 7� 0)L > o>>> 0) 0) 0) L E N a_ U N rn A N N N (n (n > !n (nU o (n d� o>> a rn O N_ F C N @@ C L¢ 00 @¢ a¢^ O) m j j U) L Co c_ c U U 0 Y N 7 C 7Q�LN c UL N L (O (D L (O t In (n .t+ W 0 U M z t�� ¢¢ H U U ` r U N W O r r r D O N N O O O j CV c ¢¢ (O CD CO co co F O O N O U U N 0 M M C 0 (D Q N CD ¢¢= N (O (O CD O CD LL r CO N R m 0) N N j N N N 0 7 m N N N Cl) E N U ,o _o0 N N� N N N N N LL O O N N N N N N N N m N N m U X "0 '0 V V U N N O "0 '0 "0 '0 "0 '0 "0 '0 0) '0 "0 c@ C C (0LL W C c C C 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 0) 7 7 � CU Ln j LLLL N i �LLLLLL i i i D i > > LL LL > > LL 3 c c LLLL lL i to a LL d > LL >LLLLLLLLLLLLLL LL LLi�LLLL N (j -p N LL y C C C� C C C li li C LL C_ C C C C C C C C C C C LL c m @ @ V— 0) E 0) E c 0) 0) E E +- 0) c E --- m E @ c E° N y N y N 0) E 0) 0) E E 0) 0) E E 0) 0) E E 0) 0) E E 0) 0) U E E@ y) L @ m -0 m o m m m E 0) E E 0) 0) E°°° 0) E E E E m 0) m E E E 0) 0) E E 0) 0) E m 0) m m m m m m m m m m N c?aaaaa����. c 0) ` L i ` L 0 0 ) 102 ) 0) 102 ` 1 � N L l L l ` L i o- E E E E E E E E E E . ..0aa�-0.0-0.0�aaaaaaaaaaa� E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E c 0 FD D'o FD co��a'a'U a'a'a'�2�2 L0 a' L0 N Co co' co M' Vl W W Cl co di r O co N' Vl M O co M Cl N Vi a n 00 M v N f: N Vi lel!deo ZZOZ-LM posodoad ay; uo 6u!JeOH ollgnd : 6690 ZZOZ-LOZ d13 :Z;uauayoePv :}u8wt43e;}d 0 N N 0 0 N 0 (0 V3 N 0 O O O O O N (f) V3 N N 01 O N O 0 Lo 0 O N 00 A r l00 0 WN 0 O O N O O N N 0 0 WO Cq O W(0 N O O (0 N O N W Vi Vi 0 N V3 V3 M V3 V3 Vi W 613 y (0 h m V 7 N n W W 0 M 0 W N I* W O W W I- n r N W y. (0 (� O) (0 O) (0 co co (0 (0 co f� (0 W (0 (0 l0 7 0 0 W 0 V d) W V3MM co V N EA(0N U) U) M Vi U) N N U) W. U) U, Vj 6.3 V3 W m c m w m �% C in m E m a mr N > O o o Q L N O. E U) (p � U)0 N 3 O C_ o a° c g uD > no m >�-m0 C y N Up)L Q� p C ¢ U) C m C B O V L V% N L L N> O O d E C O T 2 m fn E m> E E y E O U) O m 2 O O Co O N a ML '>90 E E ��- Og m-2 E > O () E(n m > a N cOLM— .O a OI m -0 4= E V O> !:!I "E E o E W m m co O L co �j�� m ° E W o a0 M E• ao(n�� m�� O E` c m mx in> , m 3 �� oU) t,c-2 >�> maytn3: .� w N�L��(nL O N N N��0 N L '�- c m m NN (p NNC4 N N C00 �(7 y W ¢U 0 O OOONO^2ai ]M N O �a'oa'o mmmma�ma�mdmdmmm� m� m� m m maa'o D d m (� V d O.5 (L V 0 cn L cn V cn (n Mrn m cn V d m d (� V > O C O N O N N O dt N O O O O N uj O (y N O N N O di 0) O N O 1N 0 O co � O N r M co ccO CN W M N W (0 m N c E � N W O O O O 0 0 0 0 O O O 0 0 000 000 O C 0 0 0000 0 0 O C O C O C 0 00 0 O O O (0 (0 0 1h (0 (0 O N O O O O co M O C Cl) M W Ih Co (0 ccO O W V) Ih N W (O O (0 V) Vi , M V) V) V3 Z O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O c O O O O O (0 O O O O O (0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O(0(0 r� (00 r� (O Icy V N V 0c0 ON 0) CD OM 0(0 CDN CD co N V M I-- V3 EH CD (O W h V3 I--l0 (0 d) O M 00 Cl) O W N V, 7 M O W Cl) O N 7 M O W W W O N (0 Cl) — V3 Vi V3 - r V3 r V3 V3 V3 r r Vi Vi V3 V3 Vi Vi V3 Vi Vi V) V3 V3 V) V3 O O O O O O CD O O O O (0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 000 00�0000000n (n o Oo0o0o000 (A(n0 N W (0 NN N(n(A CO O f- (D O (A lh 00000 V I'- N Cl) f- (0 Vi P� N �N� W (0 (0 �V)V3� W h I W M O N O M N (0 ONM NN 00 W( 0 20 Om V) V) V) V3 V) V3 V) V3 V) (A (A Vi V) Vi V) (A V) Vi V3 V3 0 O 0 0 O N a> U � W r w r £ aci v° U . U E O O 0 N a) C .N. N m > (n > t Cl) L u c ` E aEi m E d aE a ai ¢ o 0 m N (n E E 0 P 2> m E 0 S E N V p C 0 0 D° E m> (6 L W M L o y Cl y L rn° 0 y .D. p c eo M N m C E N O >0 E N E E C c C U a ¢ C N N U O V1 U) Cl) E U) N a C "O ` UI O O C O 2 L L O O O O L 00) N (n a) C >>@ M O C E C N N U O O m OD N W O O> (gyp o N U N O (o r YO 'O = a L EO O E¢= rn c° c N m c c° N` m .�., E n o N o E N E o o'w c E w N .y. m N c o m rn> N U C m E E '� ,� O O w E w- > E m> 0 c 0 c 3 m to > y cn L U (n VJ L° U1 o m m m o m 0 0 U w 3 0� E > U) Q) U¢ D cc m m Y m Y_ � 1 3 m= m E E Q O T' m m W� W� N U N L 0 U L L d (n 3 Y� m m m $m m N Y E a) .O .`` a) H > N (o O .t.+ co .�.+ .L.+ W m m m m >j $C m 3 N Y m� E (6 y w m M (6 ¢ N N N N W N m m 3 ° m a O m N co o m -o ino(nm >0 mm"t't7 a c in > >in 5 in-o m m�� y ¢0.0--- Day¢¢ .-din �Ua c e �N Nrn m(o 3 3 >i W Of W �comm4iS °2: E(o m0(n QUaU) N2N . Ih222V)(nV)U)0NN co co N>NU _ W a0)W to dt O O O O in N ccW M O � N Vi V! O O a v co co a a (O (O O O O O O O N N O O dt 1N O N m lel!deo ZZOZ-LOZ posodoad ay; uo 6u!JeOH ollgnd : 6690 ZZOZ-LOZ d13 :Z;uauayoePv :}u8wt4Oe;}d O N _ N O N c F n O o = N Y O vi N N O N O N O N O fA O N O N O Of O N O fA W 0 O N O n 0 N O N 0 m O N N w a U. X U E - t m C O w i = a y � � c o m � o m E 3: > - w oll O 2 c Q Z O v U N o w -0 a` E U Li a w F m O OO O O M O W O Ln dD m O OO O O M O W O O m O OO O O m O W O O w M O Oct O O 60. O O IO' IO' ta Ok A N m c s m d R R�'aU c lel!deo ZZOZ-LOZ posodoad ay; uo 6u!JeOH ollgnd : 6690 ZZOZ-LOZ d13 :Z;uauayoePv :}u8wt4Oe;}d N N Cl N r O N O w N V d O a 0000000000000000000000 N O O O O EA O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O LO LO LO LO O �Ln OOOOOLO OLO LOOOOOLO 1p N�I--N 6-j 6>M NLO mm 6e, fA0 O LO I-N 6e, te,-q 7 NfAfA L,- MOMS to fA ON ��(AM NA 0 N 0000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 °Cl N N � 6s to Zi � co O N 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 0 O O 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 ui O O LO LO LO LO LO LO r N O � EA E!i EA Vf to3 N ttl CD N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 W) LO W) ° ° LOO O N EA is3 is3 LO � LLO V) ER O U� N O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CD O o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 O O CD c CD 0 o o 0 0 O Lf) Lo O O LO O Ln Lo O o r fA EA fA EA EA EA LO LO EA Efl EA LO H3 O N 0 o 0 0 o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LO co�0�q t EA q N M � EA 0 EA O � � N O O CD CD CD CD CD CD O O O O O CD CDO 0 O O O O O O O 00000 O O O O O O O O O O LO LO O O O LO 0000 O LO ti O I- lO VD N 0) O U� Lf) 64 N -It f!i co 64 EH O M NA EH lh E CDVD er N 0 0 0 0 O o 0 o O cm)0 Cl � N O O CDe% O O O by O O 6i) 0 CD 0 0 O O e2J ++ t0 l6 Q) O LO O O O O LO r O N O O � fA EA f!i fA � !f3 V3 N N W a X X X V 0 a E c U o O Y dco Q a ° a C O U m C m o @ cc U wE aci E p c ° c ° o Q U O E > E c y c O Y N > O U7 E C L O =o a y a c E 3 o o Y m u, p o E E o v E 2 y w a W E am > �e o n m o c E o 0 cl cl c r_ a° E° m E Y a L- E aEi 0� o m m n o>£ E N Z c c° E o ° m a m 0 a ° 0 o i m N v oam m (7a Co .2 m5 U y U E m> o m o m a ma m m a L 02,a a, > 3 a L) c i cQa'F ommaa a oY Y yLL n O N a�i m Y a° �j y o° E 3° >1 o o � a .� ° m a m a c a o o O ae o cmOLC) S e w° a > a R¢.000D) 22020d:UO)0 >- aUU>O LL `m c U O E 0 0 M an fR 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 CNN 0 0 0 V n tR O O O O O N 4-1 O LO W je;ideo ZZOZ-LLOZ posodoad ay; uo 6uiaeOH o!Ignd : 6690 ZZOZ-LWZ diD :Z }u8wt43elIV :;uauayoellV O o O o C C Ln n o eo N n ta ta O O O O O O In O N CD m O W O O C C Ln Lo o b� O O O O O O In 04 m O W O O O O C C Ln M O W b� O O O O O O In m O fR O O C C o Lo Ln rl a N b� O O O O O O O LO LO O N LO N H3 ff3 [f3 C0 C C 0 0 o Ln o n N Ln 64 K3 64 O O O O O O O LO LO O N LO N ER ff3 [f3 O O O O O O O Ln O Ln N N Ln 64 K3 64 O O O O O O O LO LO O N LO N [f3 U9 U9 O O O O O O O O O O Ln O Ln 0 0 Ln Ln Ln 0 0 ME4 � nEsN0 Ln0 ce)64 6404O 64 64 64 04 64 O C O O C O O W C C O EA 64 d E K U > N Y_ _ to E � >� (6 M (n a cr w ° m Q V m a) '� r d=Q c E E N O U C a 0- mQ O N o E mO E O '� (n a C 0 > a N ZM -o a a) r E° a "O N 01 N Y N N O N O COO J a) N m a C7 d rn a 3 0 d c m -. Y LL e Y a TU a o o a n ID CO 0) a cn O a a U 5.r E> LT U N N N co N N N N N �_ N_ �_ N M M M M M M M -0 -0 � 10 -0 10 � 10 'O 'O C C 'O C C 'O 'O C C 'O 'O C C C C O L 0 0 ll O O � Y� Y lL ll lL lL y lL ll lL ll _ a`0aa oaa10aa`0�in�inin O O O C E E E a E E E E E E E E E N N N N N N N N O N O N N E El E E E E E E.E E_E E_E �00w0w0.WWDa aaaaaaaaaa�aa WDW0 N C O N b� c E d 7 m �c E a� 'm m � � N a L) E d -y O Y a Lo m 0 0 _ r n n O n O O co 0 O 1, �z v W ER 69 co n ro coon T O co G�r-TIMC-', O � LO LO �O O O O �:07) bl� —Iw lel!deo ZZOZ-LOZ posodoad ay; uo 6u!JeOH ollgnd : 6690 ZZOZ-LOZ d13 :Z;uauayoePv :}u8wt4Oe;}d � o Q a m m a M C, 00 N O O oc V) O O O EA 0 O 0 O O O Ono fA 00 O 0 NEA O O O EA O c 0 O O O Ono fA O O O NEA O O O EA O O O O m O M O O 00 O O O O O O n— 0)�EA fA O 00 'A'A O n M'A EA O M O N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O(3) cONmn 00 EA O O 001n NN EA O O 0000 N 10 EA EA O O N N EA EA O 10 EA ID E N c Coa. @ O U w u {p U 12 c a O U CA fn c a 0 U_ O C 6 c E a) 0a a) 2 12 E 0 0 E;o @ . T a . r 2 a)> c a a) U a c rn> U@ 0 u > a a �� E@ @aa a o y o a o a@ E @ a)a c o c7. E cm Y@ m 3 c U d@ U c mZ� U' U Uin yU, E202 � 76 @ 0) �o a N m a� H U 00 7 a T 2 H a'm E 3o 2 N W /A 0000000000000 O M 0 Ci 0 Ci 0 0 t o cc I o S 0 EA O � O � O n co t4 V b9 EA EA 0 0 O O co O 0 O O NN r- O O O O O EA O O O O N � O O O con EA O O O N� O O O co �3 O O O NN O O O Ono EA O O O N� O 100 O M ui � O O ui O O o O O 0 O O 0 O O O O o n o0)� V3 V3 O O N N 0 0 O W O O 0 0 O O 0 0 O O 0 0 O 0 cooo N N coEA N O) V� 001N � EA N 0000 N l0 EA EA N N EA EA l0 EA c m U o E U w c a N N >@ -0 a n E 0 @ O: E o c C . a o@ @ a. N c£ rn O` Z o 0 0 c ° 7 a a a @ 'y o E @ a@ E C o 01 y c> 22 O a v U N O) d > Q U) @ j c@£@ @U U c U" _-a_U CvaSE Q-wmin coU�U c- of L c 0 C N F U a F U c U O a N J 2i w �o: w w w N w w w w N w N Na- w N w �2 �2 c c c c>> c>> c c c > > LL LL > > LL LL LL LL o o LL LL o LL > o LL > LL � LL o LL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 d d d d E E E E d d@ d N N N N N N N N N N N N N E E E E E E E E E E E E E N M co Ln O Co O O Co O O O Co O O O Co 00 O O N M co N O N 10 O lel!deo ZZOZ-LOZ posodoad ay; uo 6u!JeOH ollgnd : 6690 ZZOZ-LOZ d13 :Z;uauayoePv :}u8wt4Oe;}d O Ok O M O IA 00 0 a m m a |m@eo Z 0 - OZ pa odo d em uo BuNeO H oilqnd 6690 Z oZ 1O0 d o emt43e v :} ewt4Oe n¥ § Q � © a � � 2 a. ] N d ( ] a C4 ) 2 § CD) m a N § e [ 2 ' K § \ Z ) 2 § u U. a B B ® k �44 0 ® 2 0 CN k� © in m - G q C e _ - co/ co m ® 2 m _ N \ } Q � Q J e \ e k2 \ C-4 K / } eq eq �] kƒ =a §§ Ga co § §] rco k ))! r, 2 27 ■ § �G \ � j\ o �� lel!deo ZZOZ-LOZ posodoad ay; uo 6u!JeOH ollgnd : 6690 ZZOZ-LOZ d13 :Z;uauayoePv :}u8wt4Oe;}d 00000000000000 oCoC 'CC oa n VT EA V3 � a fA M M N EA M EA N O O N O p N i0 fA O O O N O � N fA O O O O N u? O N 1 O O O O O O O O O LQ N � � O O O O N O � N � O o 0 0 O o o O 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 ci O N I O N O C � EA fA fA fA N W W a LL V X c O � n L U EU m m m C Ey m J —> a C C c 't ; o - lL E E m O J m o m 3 m m � E d m c m o U C m L N m o E C D1 3 U N (n m O C C C C C~@ w m D J m N C N m a ❑ 3 o m VVV5 o°auq > 6'2 O @ R td�N° O N y c m Z O m '� �. m a N U ._ � C N m f o N� d C� �, � N 45 L U Ux in N O Y'E "NOa Y f W 0 mmcUrmJcc ' V E om� oa o ma m o.c d' L N?m. O:' !nj,5y a 400U �i c.) Uri w LLa OU> N p N N n (D nj ER N O N N �O ER O O N � N O N N �O n o? V O O o O O N N �O N N� O O O O O N N �O N M N� O O O r �n �n aD O W N O mr W V D) o0o 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O o000 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 O O EA SEA 0 o N 0 O O O NM O N SEA � �� m O N � m O(C M 0) OD OOD O � O NO O OM O N O� O ._ N W fA EA EA EA EA EA W L U m o H C JO v H C U y m E n mJ'=mmm m H m m o y aci E 0Y m m ~ y c m m 0] O] O O V N m C o @ o >� m.y ° m c_�IL o_a HO C o y m:Y v LL y EC O O �aU IL ND �'CQL� O1 O N^ D1 O @'t N NU E r o 2 m U ` c N t0 N =2>OoUUa>O>UU>Ug�ll m O .��' O> N j y? o m> m m m O 0 N mo w N w o 0 w N 0 0 w w 0 0 w w 0 0 w w 0 w V 0 0 w w a y J N 3@> O YLOO V r oNN ONN c - m — c NNNN NNNNNNNNNN .......... NNNNNN E—;; m ... w � U 'O V Q V 'O V 'O V 'O V 'O V 'O V� V m U m O U c U J c LL J m LL J J LL LL J J LL LL J J LL LL J J LL LL J J LL LL J LL O J J LL LL N m E -a-FEE `F E E 10 E E E E E E E E E E E E V m w m m m w w w w w w w w w w w w w 0E w E w w d 'p y a ami y y C C N C C C C C C C C C C C O C C m c m LL m m m m LL m m m m m m m m m m m w m m tl! c 0 E m Ems- m O E E : E2 E E : E2 E E : E2 E E : E2 E E : E2 E c : " E E : : N ."c m m E'c 'c�a £aaJaaJaaJaaJaaJaaaa > m Y m E E Y E E E E E E E E E E E E E m co dOm00m0 d�����������U�� |m@eo Z 0 - OZ pa odo d em uo BuNeO H oilqnd : 6690 Z oZ 1O0 d o emt43e v :} ewt4Oe n¥ \j ,6 § !» �, ƒ\a •)\k o oLL \a\\ t<S 2.:c � --\�d\�=//)� \|;i! - ®u§E clmm ■m .2 E§ ®)\e§coEi do&a \°$Sk8)�t§«f§ l:maw(S3lw0>D� E R O d y C d E 0 Q E R Q R U je;ideo ZZOZ-LLOZ posodoad ay; uo 6uiaeOH o!Ignd : 6690 ZZOZ-LWZ diD :Z }uatuyoelIV :;uauayoellV O O O O l9 CD M O CD CD G O D O EA OEAO� O 000001- ON V 00mONO 0 a) M (D (00 0 GNOMON M I- CD(O V co EA N M N CD N V V V M N N (O I- N N V N fH &a N N N M M M&�— Ef-) to Ef-) Ms O V (D 0 O N V LOO V O 0 VIl- �2 D V Val O LO V Q) M 0 0 V &a � CD co CD LO 0 co O N N co N &a Val co W O O M O 0 D) 0 N C U7 Val O O l!) 0 0 C O CD 0 CD O 0 0 0 cc C C 00 l 0 O O 0 NOO LO V co Val co MI&- O N V co oc U7 U3 U3' V; (D co N O co N O I�Nr CD O OV O D) V 0 l!) V O N N V V co O (D VEAMM N O N V U3 � V3 V3 613 613 Ef) a) E a) O a E o @a O E E T E E E E E E E O" O Q7 Q7 T U >� 01 a a a a a 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 2.5 N — m m > > a) N a) a) O —O a) o a) a) a) a) m a) (n E E a)-2 E a) E E E E E E� >. a) U a) s U= CO a) U= a) U a) a) U U a) a) U U a) U cn mm�a)m�mmmmmma)m L O_ O_ Q O_ O_ O_ O_ O_ O_ O_ L N � (O (D (D 0 h 5^� h N Q) CD N 0 co N co 0 0 0@ 0 0 0 N 0 0 N N 0 0 N 0 0 N N N O N N N N N N N N U- N C 0 C O 0 aid r c m E 3 �c C O O N 0 O N O O O I� O Cl) r O D) N 0 co O N O O O O O O O V N 0 co O (I'llN [ O (fl C. l0 O oc 01 r O O 00 N O N Gq to O 0 C. O O D) 00 C. co r O O N Gq V�l 000 0 C. O O O 000 0 h 666 O r 000 I l- O N U> (I'll (I'll V3 000 O C. V O O O L O O O 00 m O I� r g O O O � � — N N VJ HI HI LU rnrn 0 0 2-2 Cl) Cl) 0 0 > > __e_ N M N N N E CDy LLL LLL O E O V C n) rn O O 1` 1` c Oi 7 'O U C C N m L N N 2 to N t0 L) a O O m U a) 0 -0-0 E E LL N ED 0 O C LL O 0 C O a) 7 7 m p >.�� ��LO WmU O C O O CD N rK� O N O C n Gf, M M N W9. O N _O C ff O � 01 M r W9. O N (0 C 10 Ef, 00 00 00 N r NV) O N O C O O M h N r Nf� O N CD O C O v O f0 M r O N O C O v O T N R 00 LO O .— bA N N LI N r• d d Y u m 9L lel!deo ZZOZ-LOZ posodoad ay; uo 6u!JeOH ollgnd : 6690 ZZOZ-LOZ d13 :Z;uauayoePv :}u8wt4Oe;}d N N O N N O N O N O N W 0 N DD O N X d 0 c 0 co aa) aa) a E E dm m O c c a` g m c N O O m lL LL d d V U U at d Q) A o '-m 2 '- � dazes a E 0 35 co to Ci N O O O O M m N N O O O O N N H O O O co O O N e9 N m A N 40 N lel!deo ZZOZ-LOZ posodoad ay; uo 6u!JeOH ollgnd : 6690 ZZOZ-LOZ d13 :Z;uauayoePv :}u8wt4Oe;}d Q a m m a 0 coo 0o N N �, t»0� O N O O O O F6s fA O N N N O N O N _T O N W N co 0 U, O A U) O N to 00 IN N LO O O O O O to N N O M N N O O 7 Cl) O N O O O N O O M � O O N O 0 M V3 O N O L M W M4R n d £ u� O rn L o o 00 p N N W X C S C 3 N U > o m to 2� c a� U y m i � m y N ° N N z @ N N N O U L � LL N y O a `' Cc y y�p°p m� 0U 0 6 C N'j N a m c LL E c a E2 N L' o W m LL ly6 V c c o o a@ O C N? N co 0 CCWMWZW z > S 11 E c m N 0 c° @ °1mLLW ° (7LTC)U C M O O C O O M CO N tD Ok n a O N eN 0 N M O N O � � N O Lq 0 O to N O N O O O O O N N N T O O r O O N O m IN O O O O O O O O 43 N 0 O N m N d O .E- N N W x X X N � t/I y o N V C ° o 3 to a ° o 2 a G E E o U to tm @ c m mN c .� o ❑ 3 ° _@ z L O LL Y N N L y o cU m c oc6 2 o 0 m ° g a o N ` o c y c g N E K c4 N N � LL a W y m ❑ d c a ag a d d) N U N U j N U a `o c c c u a) r N y :72 y M C U O N O N N (C`p O 7aUDz(9 U'z je;ideo ZZOZ-LLOZ pesodWd ay; uo 6uiae8H o!Ignd : 6690 ZZOZ-LWZ diD :Z }uauayoelIV :;uauayoellV IL U- U E 0 IL y C E 0 Q. E f0 Q fC U OOOOOLO LO N(00)00 V N 613,61) ER O ER O O Ih V 0 0 N o (3iOLr) (Oo(C V 0M N000(00 _ (ONO V 0(0 O2 M(0 (A Cl)N 00 0) 0 0 Cl) —7 61) —7 —7 N N N N EA EA ER EA ER EA EA 00 0 � O N (_O C0 N M CO Cl) M V � H3 U3 V3 co 00 O 00It r (0 Cl) Cl) M 7 V3 EH H3 O W M I- O N LO M O O L0 O � M H3 V U3 V3 0 7 LO O O O 0 M 7 EH H3 O LO V 0) L0 0) N N V ,-: EA Vf EH O O O M O o rn o o "t O00 I� N _ N co � 61 N Ef3 M EA 04 M LO I0 (0O N 06 O r- N 00 U9 N L0 N 7 N�j 00 H3 EH -7 c c c C C C C C C 000000 E E E E E E E E E 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 E E E E E E E E E 0 m a) m L m L m@ L L m@ L L m@ L L - (6 @ E 0 0 N 0 N E 0 E 0 E 0 E U E U E U j j @ a @ n O T CL O N n @ OL (6 n @ a (6 n @ a a) C) a) C) a) C) a) C) a) C) a) N C) N C) N C) N C) N C) N- U 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 a) � a) U a) � a) U a) � a) U a) � a) U a) � a) U a) U) a � Ln (0 (0 r- r co O O N co O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O N'ON, N O N O N O o�co 0 O o p 0 oo v (O O � 00 LO Ef3 66. � Ld co � 00 O CD N N fR EA L Ln L CM M m L M L( N N fR W 00 CD 00 t � n N Ln N N ta OW O_ O CD CD CO 00 M M N fR 00 a 00 ta le O L17 00 W M M N N 61) tl� O 0 0 o 00 c0 00 0 (o n ui (O O M N E!) f- 613 CD fA M ER fH N CM0W61) ql,� V�EA N n O ta CM M s 6) E N O � y M O N O 0 -C L C) (n N 0 N N U ° N N a` _o C2S LL N 6 o °� C) U) lc;-) 0 c O c O OO C Y C L.L O O L.L O O L.L O w r_ (A 3 a) i F- o6 E ` O Z c C) c N c C) m C 06 o O�i N E 0 0 0 � N c m CO o � o min a 9EEE a ... @ E N D C) @ io C J J F of of of ly-- F F u� a d Y u m je;ideo ZZOZ-LLOZ posodoad ay; uo 6uiaeOH o!Ignd 6690 ZZOZ-LWZ diD :Z }u8wt43elIV :;uauayoellV Q cc � a m Y U R d O o O o `� CD o N p CD N N O N O O 07 O En N N o C CD CD CD O O N O N O O U9 O 6'3 N N O O O fR O O O O O O N O N O O O EA N N o C � O O CD O O O O O U9 O to N N O O O CD fR � O O 00 p O co O O O EA O E� N N O O O O � n O O o n r <O » <sr 0 o CDo v� N N O O O fR N y UM4 O £ E� N N w N O C N y N O E N d N 4) C 7 N > E V N 7 N N 41 C N 0 N N m 7 3 t a O N N N R ti a) c y> O U � L � IL N 3 R R R o D o c :Dz r rrw |m@eo Z 0 - OZ pa odo d em uo BuNeO H oilqnd 6690 Z oZ 1O0 d o emt43e v :} ewt4Oe n¥ Q © a LO� ��kLO a. j���) § E 22 k 2 \ j 6.A.b Q Packet Pg. 118 6.A.b CIP PARKS PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS Q Packet Pg. 119 6.A.b Q Packet Pg. 120 CITY OF EDMONDS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT NAME: Anderson Center ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $25,000 Field/Court/Stage 700 Main Street, Snohomish County, within Edmonds City limits 2.3 acres; zoned public neighborhood park/openspace field PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Upgrades to youth sports field, picnic and playground amenities and children's play equipment. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: As a neighborhood park, the Frances Anderson Center serves the community with various sports, playground and field activities including various special events. Upgrade and additions essential to meet demand for use. SCHEDULE: 2017-2022 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration Construction $0 $5,000 $10,000 $5,000 $0 $5,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $0 $5,000 $10,000 $5,000 $0 $5,000 * all or a portion of this project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts. Packet Pg. 121 CITY OF EDMONDS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT NAME: Brackett's Landing ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $115,000 Improvements —i'S South: Main Street and Railroad Avenue south of Edmonds Ferry Terminal on Puget Sound North: 2.7 acres with tidelands and adjacent to Department of Natural Resources public tidelands with Underwater Park South: 2.0 acres with tidelands south of ferry terminal. Regional park/Zoned commercial waterfront. Protected as public park through Deed -of -Right; partnership funding IAC/WWRC/LWCF /DNR-ALEA & Snohomish Conservation Futures PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Landscape beautification, irrigation, furnishings/bench maintenance, exterior painting, repairs, jetty improvements/repair, north cove sand, habitat improvement, fences, interpretive signs, structure repairs, sidewalk improvements, restroom phased rehabilitation in 2018. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Retention of infrastructure for major waterfront park, regional park that serves as the gateway to Edmonds from the Kitsap Peninsula. SCHEDULE: 2017-2022 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration Construction $0 $100,000 $5,000 $5,000 $0 $5,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $0 $100,000 $5,000 $5,000 $0 $5,000 ' all or part of this project may quality for 1 % for the Arts Packet Pg. 122 CITY OF EDMONDS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT NAME: City Park Improvements I ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $75,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: City Park. Continued pathway, access improvements and ongoing upgrades to PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Make ongoing upgrades to City Park as referenced in the PROS plan. SCHEDULE: 2017-2022 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration Construction $0 $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $0 $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 *all or part of this project may qualify for 1 % for the arts Packet Pg. 123 CITY OF EDMONDS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT NAME: Civic Center ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,325,000 Improvements / Stadium Demolition PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Civic Center Improvements / Stadium Demolition PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Civic Center Improvements / Stadium Demolition. As part of the Master planning process for Civic, and in consideration of the current condition of the stadium, it is being recommended to demolish the current stadium. The City also has some grant funds available to assist with this. SCHEDULE: 2017 - 2022 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Construction $100,000 $5,000 $10,000 $10,000 $600,000 $600,000 TOTAL $100,000 $5,000 $10,000 $10,000 $600,000 $600,000 Packet Pg. 124 CITY OF EDMONDS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT NAME: Sunset Avenue Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $ See Transportation CIP dobw -0111111111", PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Provide a multi -use path on the west side of Sunset Ave with expansive views of the Puget Sound and the Olympic Mountains. The multi -use path will connect the downtown business district, surrounding neighborhoods, water access points, and the existing parks and trails system. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This multi -use path has been a priority for the City of Edmonds for several years. It is included in 5 different City plans, the Transportation Improvement Plan, Non -Motorized Section; the Parks Recreation and Open Plan; the City comprehensive Plan, Capital Facilities Plan; the Capital Improvement Plan; and the Shoreline Master Program. Specifically, the Parks Recreation and Open Space Plan identified Sunset Avenue Overlook priorities, namely improved connectivity and multi -modal access, complete the bicycle and pedestrian route system, identify scenic routes and view areas, and landscape improvements. SCHEDULE: COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Planning/Study Eng. & Admin. Construction 1 % for Art TOTAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Packet Pg. 125 CITY OF EDMONDS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT NAME: Fishing Pier & Restrooms ESTIMATED COST: $120,000 LWCF/IAC Acquisition and Development Project 6.A.b PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Fishing pier parking lot landscape improvements. Re -tile and renovate restroom facilities. PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Capital improvements to retain capital assets and enhance western gateway to the Puget Sound. SCHEDULE: 2017-2022 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Planning/Study Eng. & Admin. Construction $75,000 $5,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $75,000 $5,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 * all or part of this Project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts Packet Pg. 126 CITY OF EDMONDS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN DESCRIPTION 6.A.b PROJECT NAME: Community Garden ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $155,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Locate and develop a community garden site. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This was formerly planned for the Former Woodway HS site. This is adopted as part of the PROS plan. SCHEDULE: 2017-2022 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration Construction $155,000 1 % for Art TOTAL ' all or a portion of this project may quality for 1 % for the Arts Packet Pg. 127 CITY OF EDMONDS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT NAME: Maplewood Park ESTIMATED COST: $15,000 Improvements 89t" Place West and 197t" Street SW, Edmonds City limits, within Snohomish County 12.7 acres (10.7 acres Open Space & 2 acres Neighborhood Park) Zoned Public PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Improvements to the picnic, roadway, parking, play area and natural trail system to Maplewood Park. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improvements to retain site as an asset to the neighborhood park system. SCHEDULE: 2017-2022 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Planning/Study Eng. & Admin. Construction $0 $0 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $0 1 % for Art TOTAL $0 $0 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $0 * all or part of this Project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts Packet Pg. 128 CITY OF EDMONDS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT NAME: Marina Beach Park ESTIMATED COST: $1,330,000 Improvements South of the Port of Edmonds on Admiral Way South, Edmonds City limits, Snohomish County 4.5 acres / Regional Park / Zoned Commercial Waterfront, marina beach south purchased with federal transportation funds. WWRC / IAC Acquisition Proiect; Protected throuqh Deed -of -Right RCW PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 2018-2020. Begin development of Master plan, daylighting Willow Creek in PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improvements to retain site as an asset to the regional waterfront park system. SCHEDULE: 2017-2022 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Planning/Study Eng. & Admin. Construction $0 $325,000 $500,000 $500,000 $5,000 $0 1 % for Art TOTAL $0 $325,000 $500,000 $500,000 $5,000 $0 x all or part of this project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts. Packet Pg. 129 CITY OF EDMONDS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT NAME: Mathay Ballinger Park I ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $30,000 781h Place W. & 241st St. at Edmonds City Limits. 1.5 acres/Neighborhood Park/Zoned Public. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Improvements to Mathay Ballinger Park. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improvements to retain site as an asset in the neighborhood park system. SCHEDULE: 2017-2022 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Planning/Study Eng. & Admin. Construction $20,000 $0 $5,000 $0 $5,000 $0 1 % for Art TOTAL $20,000 $0 $5,000 $0 $5,000 $0 * all or part of this Project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts Packet Pg. 130 CITY OF EDMONDS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT NAME: Meadowdale Clubhouse ESTIMATED COST: $10,000 Grounds 6801 N. Meadowdale Road, Edmonds City limits, within Snohomish County 1.3 acres / Neighborhood Park / Zoned RS20 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Improvements to the parking area, wooded area, trail system and landscaping of exterior clubhouse at Meadowdale Clubhouse site. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improvements to retain site as an asset with installation that provides community use of the facility and north Edmonds programming for day care, recreation classes and preschool activities. SCHEDULE: 2017-2022 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Planning/Study Eng. & Admin. Construction $0 $5,000 $0 $5,000 $0 $0 1 % for Art TOTAL $0 $5,000 $0 $5,000 $0 $0 * all or part of this Project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts Packet Pg. 131 CITY OF EDMONDS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT NAME: Meadowdale Playfields I ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $500,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Partnerships with City of Lynnwood and Edmonds School District to renovate Meadowdale Playfields.. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Partnership to leverage funds, renovate two multi use athletic fields and softball fields. Increase field accessibility and use for Edmonds citizens. SCHEDULE: 2017-2022 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Engineering & Administration Construction $500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 1 % for Art TOTAL $500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Packet Pg. 132 CITY OF EDMONDS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT NAME: Pine Ridge Park ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $50,000 Improvements 83`d Avenue West and 2041" St. SW, Edmonds City Limits, within Snohomish County 22 acres (20 acres zoned openspace/2 acres neighborhood park) Zoned Public; Adopted Master Plan PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Forest improvements, habitat improvements, tree planting, wildlife habitat attractions, trail improvements, signs, parking. Natural trail links under Main Street connecting to Yost Park. Forest Management Study in 2018 PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Retention of natural open space habitat site and regional trail connections. SCHEDULE: 2017-2022 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Planning/Study 40000 Eng. & Admin. Construction $0 $0 $5,000 $0 $5,000 $0 1 % for Art TOTAL I $0 $400001 $5,000 1 $0 1 $5,000 1$0 New additions meet the 1 % for the Arts Ordinance requirements Packet Pg. 133 CITY OF EDMONDS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT NAME: Seaview Park ESTIMATED COST: $65,000 Improvements 801h Street West and 1861h Street SW, Snohomish County, within Edmonds City limits 5.5 acres; Neighborhood Park/ Zoned Public; Purchased and developed with LWCF funds through IAC; protected with Deed - Of -Right PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Annual repair and upgrade to facilities and fields. Maintenance of tennis courts, pathway improvements, and play area. Replace roof on restrooms. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Site serves as neighborhood park with children's play area, open lawn, softball/baseball fields and soccer fields, restroom facilities, basketball court, parking and tennis courts. SCHEDULE: 2017-2022 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Planning/Study Eng. & Admin. Construction $50,000 $0 $10,000 $0 $5,000 $0 1 % for Art TOTAL $50,000 $0 $10,000 $0 $5,000 $0 * all or part of this Project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts Packet Pg. 134 CITY OF EDMONDS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT NAME: Sierra Park Improvements ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $70,000 LACE LEA FJAPAN ESF MAPLE {Acrr pm]mmlum di —cure) ihlkdecld unur shrub or t—Ts nmeire to Japan and Dore . 11 it uruslly many elemmrp and h lile moll a1r.' end drllrm l¢ ut all mopi.. Its Irarrs &rc i to a inches in t-Zh arr flarlp cur Inrn rhrpadllke aryl lam. -cmf color *»Ott hp sat" hul l6r e uet common colon core hrlphl V,..n and red, •1'hrsirrcf harr a mnuaJeJ frm nlrh x'peplhµ branchpr. 7hq' rmn by Rn...n In tubs and arr _c[tenl for hummL r ; 4• 14 801h Street West and 1911h Street SW, Snohomish County, within Edmonds City limits 5.5 acres; Neighborhood Park/ Zoned Public PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Improve pathways and interpretive braille signs. Field renovation to include field drainage for turf repair. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Site serves as neighborhood park with children's play area, open lawn, softball/baseball fields and soccer fields, portable restroom facilities, basketball hoops, parking and Braille interpretive trail for the blind. SCHEDULE: 2017-2022 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Planning/Study Eng. & Admin. Construction $0 $70,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 1 % for Art TOTAL $0 $70,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 * all or part of this Project may qualify for 1% for the Arts Packet Pg. 135 CITY OF EDMONDS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT NAME: Waterfront Redevelopment ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $525,000 / Waterfront Walkway Completion ..-.-_. - lom/..pr Brach------------ 1 e;r;ar�wat� -------..,__... --------•- err.„'•, i lArtSFM�! law � PropvSed Edimvl s Watarfrorm Cancer f ;rrur5; - r ,o. yyr .wo r �.ow- .-:.cxr iri way aa. scwc-. ,a.weW rr w 7 e caure sw.wrc ra o . aan ! r>[e a [sKwa rr+.. s+dn Tura. swo•. - .sum. f.� r _ " � I[xYJf,W Rvp a &F+.aa [�eo•q aewm bAs..r -� l+,r d hM.y 4 ter. G7YY p�4 `,w �.'. � �' 14ggped Tbrn pig lR gran W ran patlan End. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Work with Sr. Center to renovate surrounding park, parking lot and walkway. Remove creosote pier, reintroduce habitat for fish and wildlife. Increase access to the waterfront. Connect waterfront walkway from Brackett's Landing South to Olympic Beach, including completion in front of the Ebb tide condominiums. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Provide anew Senior and Community Center and provide a new beachfront walkway. One of the top priorities in the PROS plan is to open up beachfront access. SCHEDULE: 2017-2022 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Planning/StudyPlanning/Study $100,000 Eng. & Admin. Construction $425,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 1 % for Art TOTAL $525,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 ' all or part of this Project may quality for 1% for the Arts Packet Pg. 136 CITY OF EDMONDS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT NAME: Yost Park / Pool ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $245,000 Improvements PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Pool replastering, tile work, and annual anticipated and unanticipated repairs. Add in -pool play amenities. Park site improvements and repairs to trails and bridges, picnicking facilities, landscaping, parking, tennis/pickleball courts and erosion control. ADA improvements. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Beautiful natural area serves as upland area for environmental education programs as well as enjoyable setting for seasonal Yost Pool users. SCHEDULE: 2017-2022 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration Construction $40,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $25,000 $30,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $40,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $25,000 $30,000 * all or part of this project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts. Packet Pg. 137 CITY OF EDMONDS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT NAME: Parklet Development, 4"' ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $70,000 Avenue Cultural Corridor A parklet is a small urban park that is made by creating a sidewalk extension that provides more space and amenities for people using the street. Usually parklets are installed on top of parking lanes and use one or more parking spaces, but do not permanently impact the underlying street. Parklets typically extend out from the sidewalk at the level of the sidewalk to the width of the adjacent parking space creating a patio and seating area, often including plantings. Parklets are public space and open to everyone. 10 A PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Develop one or more parklets on the 4 th Avenue Cultural Corridor. The first parklet will be created on 4t" Avenue adjacent to the ECA. The design will be developed with Parks crew and an artist/landscape consultant. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Provide a small urban park along the 4 th Avenue Cultural Corridor with views of Puget Sound and seating on a popular walking route. Parklets are a resting and a gathering space and highlight the social function integral to streets. The importance of additional small gathering spaces is referred to in both the Community Cultural Plan and the PROS Plan. SCHEDULE: 2017-2022 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Construction $30,000 $0 $0 $40,000 $0 $0 TOTAL $30,000 $0 $0 $40,000 $0 $0 Packet Pg. 138 CITY OF EDMONDS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT NAME: City Gateway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $30,000 Replacements (. ot 1l,, th PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Design and construct new gateway elements at SR 104 and 5 Ave. S and at Sunset and Main St. to replace aging and deteriorated signage. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: The PROS Plan, Community Cultural Plan and Streetscape Plan all refer to the importance of these visual "gateways" to the City of Edmonds. New signage with artistic elements will enhance the gateways and reinforce Edmonds reputation as a cultural destination for visitors. SCHEDULE: 2017-2022 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Repairs & Maintenance $30,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL $30,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Packet Pg. 139 CITY OF EDMONDS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT NAME: City Park Storage Building I ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $200,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Construct a new City Park Storage Building PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Construct a new City Park storage building to replace the previous storage building which was destroyed by fire in 2016. SCHEDULE: 2017 - 2022 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Construction $200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL $200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Packet Pg. 140 CITY OF EDMONDS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT NAME: ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $550,000 Veteran's Plaza PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The establishment of a Veteran's Plaza was unanimously approved by the City Council in 2014. It will serve as a tribute to the patriotic and courageous men and women who served this nation. The Plaza will reflect the bravery, sacrifice and strength they gave our country. The design will accommodate flagpoles (in their existing location), space for display of military seals and a Plaza, seating areas for reflection, some educational monuments or placards, and existing hardscape and significant trees. The address is 250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds, WA 98020 and is adjacent to the Edmonds Public Safety Building. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: The Veteran's Plaza will serve as a focal point which raises awareness of the contributions made by veterans and illustrates the high respect the citizens of Edmonds have for the men and women who have defended the rights and freedoms of this nation. It will provide a tribute for the men and women who have served and are serving in the Armed Forces of the United States. The Plaza will establish a central site for the citizens of Edmonds to conduct official observances, activities and ceremonies to honor veterans including Veterans Day. SCHEDULE: 2017-2021 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Planning/Study -Eng. & Admin. Construction $30,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $30,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 x all or part of this Project may quality for I % for the Arts Packet Pg. 141 CITY OF EDMONDS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT NAME: Outdoor Fitness Zones I ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $75,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Create outdoor fitness zones by adding fitness equipment within the park system. PROJECT BENEFITI RATIONALE: Provide outdoor places to exercise to improve the health and wellness of citizens and park users, which provides adults the opportunity to exercise while their children play. SCHEDULE: 2017-2022 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Construction $75,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL $75,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Packet Pg. 142 CITY OF EDMONDS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT NAME: Citywide Beautification I ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $126,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Beautification citywide to include Library, Senior Center, outdoor plazas, City Park, corner parks, irrigation, planting, mulch, FAC Center, vegetation, tree plantings, streetscape/gateways/street tree planting, flower basket poles. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve beautification citywide and provide comprehensive adopted plan for beautification and trees. SCHEDULE: 2017-2022 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration Construction $21,000 $21,000 $21,000 $21,000 $21,000 $21,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $21,000 $21,000 $21,000 $21,000 $21,000 $21,000 Packet Pg. 143 CITY OF EDMONDS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT NAME: Flower Pole Replacement I ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $20,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Replacement of Flower Poles in various places as needed throughout City. PROJECT BENEFITI RATIONALE: Replacement of Flower Poles in various places as needed throughout City. SCHEDULE: 2017 - 2022 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Construction $20,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL $20,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Packet Pg. 144 CITY OF EDMONDS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT NAME: Miscellaneous Paving � ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $ 40,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Includes miscellaneous small paving and park walkway improvements citywide. PROJECT BENEFITI RATIONALE: Capital improvement needs citywide in park system. SCHEDULE: 2017 - 2022 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Construction $10,000 $0 $10,000 $0 $10,000 $10,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $10,000 $0 $10,000 $0 $10,000 $10,000 all or a portion of these projects may qualify for 1 % for the Arts. 2006 Miscellaneous Paving Packet Pg. 145 CITY OF EDMONDS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT NAME: Citywide Park ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $240,000 Improvements / Misc Small Projects PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Citywide park facility and public landscaping improvements including signage, interpretive signs, buoys, tables, benches, trash containers, drinking fountains, backstops, bike racks, lighting, small landscaping projects, play areas and equipment. Landscape improvements at beautification areas and corner parks, public gateway entrances into the city and 4t" Avenue Corridor from Main St. to the Edmonds Center for the Arts, SR 104, street tree and streetscape improvements. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Overall capital improvements for citywide park facilities and streetscape improvements in public areas. SCHEDULE: 2017-2022 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Planning/Study Engineering / Administration Construction $40,000 $40,000 $40,000 $40,000 $40,000 $40,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $40,000 $40,000 $40,000 $40,000 $40,000 $40,000 Packet Pg. 146 CITY OF EDMONDS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT NAME: Sports Field Upgrade / ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $55,000 Playground Partnerships PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Partnerships with local schools, organizations, or neighboring jurisdictions to upgrade additional youth ball field or play facilities or playgrounds to create neighborhood park facilities at non -City facilities. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Annual partnerships with matching funds to create additional facilities. SCHEDULE: 2017-2022 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Engineering & Administration Construction $5,000 $25,000 $0 $25,000 $0 $0 1 % for Art TOTAL $5,000 $25,000 $0 $25,000 $0 $0 Packet Pg. 147 CITY OF EDMONDS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT NAME: Miscellaneous Unpaved ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $ 20,000 Trail / Bike Path Improvements PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Complete portions of designated trail through public parks to meet the goals of the Bicycle Plan and Pathway Plan. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Walking and connections was listed as a high priority in the comprehensive Park Plan from public survey data. Creating trails, paths and bike links is essential to meet the need for the community. Provides for the implementation of the citywide bicycle path improvements and the elements and goals of the citywide walkway plan. Linked funding with engineering funding. SCHEDULE: 2017 - 2022 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration Construction $0 $10,000 $0 $10,000 $0 $0 1 % for Art TOTAL $0 $10,000 $0 $10,000 $0 $0 * all or part of these projects may qualify for 1 % for the Arts. Packet Pg. 148 CITY OF EDMONDS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT NAME: Cultural Arts Facility ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $unk Needs Study - - 4it, Al _ [R J PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Initiate feasibility study of providing and promoting Cultural / Arts facilities for the City of Edmonds. The need for visual and performing arts facilities is a high priority stated in the adopted updated Community Cultural Arts Plan 2001 and in the 2008 update process. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: The City of Edmonds desires to secure and provide for public Cultural Arts facilities in the community. The emphasis on the arts as a high priority creates the need to study performance, management and long term potential for arts related facilities. SCHEDULE: COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Planning/Study Eng. & Admin. Construction 1 % for Art TOTAL 'all or part of this Project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts Packet Pg. 149 CITY OF EDMONDS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT NAME: Edmonds Marsh Feasibility ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $155,000 & Restoration / Walkway South of Dayton Street and Harbor Square, east of BSNF railroad, west of SR 104, north of UNOCAL 23.2 acres; Natural Open Space / Zoned Open Space PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Using strategies and recommendations identified in the comprehensive management plan, protect site from adjacent development and storm water impacts. Continue to support daylighting of Willow Creek to Puget Sound. Continue to maintain current sidewalk / pathway/boardwalk. For 2018, a section of the boardwalk will be replaced. Continue to work with Friends of the Edmonds Marsh, Earthcorps and others in the rejuvenation and management of the marsh. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: The Edmonds Marsh is a unique urban salt and fresh water marsh with abundant habitat / wildlife species. It is a designated and protected bird sanctuary. Protection is vital. Co -fund the completion of design of daylighting Willow Creek using Storm Water Utility funds as defined in the comprehensive Storm Water Management Plan, as well as grant funds available through various agencies and foundations. SCHEDULE: 2017 - 2022 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 COST Professional $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 Services Construction $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL $80,000 $30,000 $30,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 Packet Pg. 150 CITY OF EDMONDS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT NAME: Edmonds Cemetery ESTIMATED COST: $ 100,000 Mapping PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Edmonds Memorial Cemetery was deeded to the City in 1982. The City has been operating the cemetery with no markings, rows, aisles, or surveyed mapping. It is essential that the City survey/map/and mark the cemetery so as to effectively manage the plots. PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Operations of a public cemetery, with effective and accurate stewardship. SCHEDULE: 2015-2021 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Planning/Study $100,000 Eng. & Admin. Construction 1 % for Art TOTAL $0 $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 * all or part of this Project may qualify for 1% for the Arts Packet Pg. 151 CITY OF EDMONDS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT NAME: Civic Center Master Plan � ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $20,000 6t" Street N. and Edmonds Street, Edmonds City limits, Snohomish County 8.1 acres / property owned and leased from Edmonds School District until 2021; Community Park/Zoned Public PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The Civic property was purchased from the Edmonds School District in 2016. A Master Plan process is underway to develop a long term plan for the property. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: To determine the best use and future plans for redevelopment at Civic Center. SCHEDULE: 2017-2022 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Planning/StudyPlanning/Study $20,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Eng. & Admin. Construction 1 % for Art TOTAL $20,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 *all or part of this project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts Packet Pg. 152 CITY OF EDMONDS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT NAME: Waterfront Redevelopment ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $525,000 / Waterfront Walkway Completion ..-.-_. - lom/..pr Brach------------ 1 e;r;ar�wat� -------..,__... --------•- err.„'•, i lArtSFM�! law � PropvSed Edimvl s Watarfrorm Cancer f ;rrur5; - r ,o. yyr .wo r �.ow- .-:.cxr iri way aa. scwc-. ,a.weW rr w 7 e caure sw.wrc ra o . aan ! r>[e a [sKwa rr+.. s+dn Tura. swo•. - .sum. f.� r _ " � I[xYJf,W Rvp a &F+.aa [�eo•q aewm bAs..r -� l+,r d hM.y 4 ter. G7YY p�4 `,w �.'. � �' 14ggped Tbrn pig lR gran W ran patlan End. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Work with Sr. Center to renovate surrounding park, parking lot and walkway. Remove creosote pier, reintroduce habitat for fish and wildlife. Increase access to the waterfront. Connect waterfront walkway from Brackett's Landing South to Olympic Beach, including completion in front of the Ebb tide condominiums. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Provide anew Senior and Community Center and provide a new beachfront walkway. One of the top priorities in the PROS plan is to open up beachfront access. SCHEDULE: 2017-2022 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Planning/StudyPlanning/Study $100,000 Eng. & Admin. Construction $425,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 1 % for Art TOTAL $525,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 ' all or part of this Project may quality for 1% for the Arts Packet Pg. 153 CITY OF EDMONDS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT NAME: Pine Ridge Park ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $50,000 Improvements 83`d Avenue West and 2041" St. SW, Edmonds City Limits, within Snohomish County 22 acres (20 acres zoned openspace/2 acres neighborhood park) Zoned Public; Adopted Master Plan PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Forest improvements, habitat improvements, tree planting, wildlife habitat attractions, trail improvements, signs, parking. Natural trail links under Main Street connecting to Yost Park. Forest Management Study in 2018 PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Retention of natural open space habitat site and regional trail connections. SCHEDULE: 2017-2022 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Planning/Study 40000 Eng. & Admin. Construction $0 $0 $5,000 $0 $5,000 $0 1 % for Art TOTAL I $0 $400001 $5,000 1 $0 1 $5,000 1$0 New additions meet the 1 % for the Arts Ordinance requirements Packet Pg. 154 CITY OF EDMONDS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION 6.A.b PROJECT NAME: Debt Service on Approved ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,003,926 Capital Projects and Acquisitions PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Approximate annual debt service payments on: Marina Beach / Library Roof: $82,028 PSCC (Edmonds Center for the Arts): $60,298 Anderson Center Seismic Retrofit: $29,621 PROJECT BENEFITI RATIONALE: Debt service to pay for approved capitol projects SCHEDULE: 2017-2022 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Planning/Study Eng. & Admin. Construction 1 % for Art Principal & Interest $171,947 $164,766 $162,656 $165,907 $168,612 $170,038 TOTAL $171,947 $164,766 $162,656 $165,907 $168,612 $170,038 " all or part of this Project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts Packet Pg. 155 CITY OF EDMONDS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT NAME: Miscellaneous Open ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,200,000 Space / Land PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Acquisition of properties when feasible that will benefit citizens that fit the definitions and needs identified in the Parks Comprehensive Plan. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Fulfills needs of citizens for parks, recreation and open space. SCHEDULE: 2017 - 2022 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST $2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Land $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200000 1 % for Art TOTAL $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200000 Packet Pg. 156 CITY OF EDMONDS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT NAME: Waterfront Redevelopment ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $75,000 / Waterfront Walkway Completion rti PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Redevelop waterfront to secure access to Puget Sound for public use as indentified in the Parks, Recreation & Open Space Comprehensive Plan. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Public ownership of waterfront and tidelands on Puget Sound. SCHEDULE: 2017-2022 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Planning/Study Eng. & Admin. Construction $75,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 1 % for Art TOTAL $75,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Packet Pg. 157 CITY OF EDMONDS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT NAME: 4" Avenue ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $4,325,000 Corridor Enhancement PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Begin 4 th Avenue site development with temporary and/or moveable surface elements and amenities to begin drawing attention and interest to the corridor and create stronger visual connection between Main Street and the Edmonds Center for the Arts. Possible projects may include surface art, interpretive signage and wayfinding, or low level lighting. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: The corridor improvements in the public right of way will encourage pedestrian traffic & provide a strong visual connection along 4t" Ave. Improvements will enhance connectivity as an attractive walking corridor & contribute to the economic vitality in the downtown by encouraging the flow of visitors between the downtown retail & the Edmonds Center for the Arts. Timing for 30% design phase is crucial as the City addresses utility projects in the area & will assist the City in the process of identifying & acquiring funding sources for the total project implementation phase. SCHEDULE: 2017 - 2022 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration Construction $0 $1,425,000 $2,900,000 $0 $0 $1 1 % for Art TOTAL $0 $1,425,000 $2,900,000 $0 $0 $1 " all or part of this Project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts Packet Pg. 158 CITY OF EDMONDS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT NAME: Cultural Heritage Tour and ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: TBD Way -Finding Signage :191Al0]►10I•y9I91►i►Ii1(GAT1►[ato1MtoI1k; 0 G : I : I:]IETC Iatell] V (Proposed sites) N 2 2'r qS ti y � a Q a s F Z 2 ® 5pr�yne 5[ � e p2 A i V ® y ? s ® D I C Oa[t. 5[ PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Create a downtown Edmonds walking tour highlighting a dozen historic sites with artist made interpretive markers, and add way -finding signage for the downtown area. Completed. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Promote tourism and economic development in the core downtown. The walking tour and interpretive signage focuses on local history and as unique artist made pieces also reflect the arts orientation of the community. Improved way -finding signage which points out major attractions and services/amenities such as theaters, museums, beaches, train station, shopping, dining and lodging promotes both tourism and economic vitality in the downtown /waterfront activity center. SCHEDULE: 2015-2021 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration Construction 1 % for Art TOTAL * all or part of this Project may qualify for 1% for the Arts Packet Pg. 159 CITY OF EDMONDS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT NAME: Dayton Street Plaza ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $30,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Renovate small park and plaza at north end of old public works building, 2nd & Dayton Street. Improve landscaping, plaza, and accessibility. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Capital improvements to public gathering space and creation of additional art amenities and streetscape improvements in downtown on main walking route. Financial support from Edmonds Arts Festival Foundation, Hubbard Foundation and Edmonds in Bloom. SCHEDULE: 2017-2022 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Planning/Study Eng. & Admin. Construction $30,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 1 % for Art TOTAL $30,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 * all or part of this Project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts Packet Pg. 160 CITY OF EDMONDS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT NAME: Civic Center Development ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $3,135,000 / Stadium Demolition PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Civic Center Development / Stadium Demolition. As part of the Master planning process for Civic, and in consideration of the current condition of the stadium, it is being recommended to demolish the current stadium. The City also has some grant funds available to assist with this. In addition, develop a signature downtown park at this site. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Civic Center Development / Stadium Demolition. The Civic Master plan will be complete by early 2017. Funds will be set aside, and grant funds applied for in order to develop the master plan. This is a high priority in the PROS plan. SCHEDULE: 2017 - 2022 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Construction $135,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,500,000 $1,500,000 TOTAL $135,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,500,000 $1,500,000 Packet Pg. 161 CITY OF EDMONDS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT NAME: Waterfront Redevelopment ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $2,100,000 / Waterfront Walkway Completion ..-.-_. - lom/..pr Brach------------ 1 e;r;ar�wat� -------..,__... --------•- err.„'•, i lArtSFM�! law � PropvSed Edimvl s Watarfrorm Cancer f r ,o. yyr .wo r �.ow- .-:.cxr iri way aa. scwc-. ,a.weW rr w 7 e caure sw.wrc ra o . aan r>[e a [sKwa rr+- s+dn Tura. swo•. - .sum. f.� r _ " � I[xYJf,W Rvp a &F+.aa [�eo•q aewm bAs..r -� l+,r d hM.y 4 ter. G7YY p�4 `,w �.'. � �' 14ggped Tbrn pig lR gran W ran patlan , End. Ri0.laad Mci+a{4 Pw� PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Work with Sr. Center to renovate surrounding park, parking lot and walkway. Remove creosote pier, reintroduce habitat for fish and wildlife. Increase access to the waterfront. Connect waterfront walkway from Brackett's Landing South to Olympic Beach, including completion in front of the Ebb tide condominiums. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Provide anew Senior and Community Center and provide a new beachfront walkway. One of the top priorities in the PROS plan is to open up beach -front access. SCHEDULE: 2017-2022 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Planning/Study Eng. & Admin. 100,000 Construction $2,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 1 % for Art TOTAL $2,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 * all or part of this Project may qualify for 1% for the Arts Packet Pg. 162 CITY OF EDMONDS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN DESCRIPTION 6.A.b PROJECT NAME: Community Garden ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $155,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Locate and develop a community garden site. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This was formerly planned for the Former Woodway HS site. This is adopted as part of the PROS plan. SCHEDULE: 2017-2022 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration Construction $155,000 1 % for Art TOTAL ' all or a portion of this project may quality for 1 % for the Arts Packet Pg. 163 CITY OF EDMONDS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT NAME: Wetland Mitigation I ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: TBD PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Using strategies and recommendations identified in the comprehensive management plan, protect site from adjacent development and storm water impacts. Continue to support day -lighting of Willow Creek to Puget Sound. Sidewalk / pathway repairs and continuation of walkway / viewing path to the hatchery if environmentally feasible. Work with Friends of the Edmonds Marsh, People for Puget Sound and others in the rejuvenation and management of the marsh. This also includes planning for the outfall of Willow Creek into Marina Beach Park. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: The Edmonds Marsh is a unique urban salt and freshwater marsh with abundant habitat / wildlife species. It is a designated and protected bird sanctuary. Protection is vital. Co -fund the completion of a master plan using Storm Water Utility funds as defined in the comprehensive Storm Water Management Plan. As well as grant funds available through various agencies and foundations. SCHEDULE: 2015-2021 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration Construction 1 % for Art TOTAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 * all or part of this project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts. Packet Pg. 164 CITY OF EDMONDS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION 6.A.b PROJECT NAME: Edmonds Marsh / Willow ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $3,200,000 Creek Daylighting PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Using strategies and recommendations identified in the comprehensive management plan, protect site from adjacent development and storm water impacts. Continue to support day -lighting of Willow Creek to Puget Sound. Sidewalk / pathway repairs and continuation of walkway / viewing path to the hatchery if environmentally feasible. Work with Friends of the Edmonds Marsh, People for Puget Sound and others in the rejuvenation and management of the marsh. This also includes planning for the outfall of Willow Creek into Marina Beach Park. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: The Edmonds Marsh is a unique urban salt and fresh water marsh with abundant habitat / wildlife species. It is a designated and protected bird sanctuary. Protection is vital. Co -fund the completion of a master plan using Storm Water Utility funds as defined in the comprehensive Storm Water Management Plan. As well as grant funds available through various agencies and foundations. SCHEDULE: 2015-2021 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration Construction $200,000 $0 $1,500,000 $1,500,000 $0 $0 1 % for Art TOTAL 1 $200,000 $0 $1,500,000 $1,500,000 $0 $0 all or part of this project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts. Packet Pg. 165 CITY OF EDMONDS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT NAME: Public Market (Downtown ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: Unknown Waterfront) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Work with community partners to establish a public market, year around, on the downtown waterfront area. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: The project will help to create a community gathering area, boost economic development, bring tourists to town, and will be a valuable asset to Edmonds. SCHEDULE: This project depends on the ability to secure grant funding, and community partners willing to work with the city to establish this. This potentially can be accomplished by 2017. COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022-2027 Planning/Study Eng. & Admin. Construction 1 % for Art TOTAL * all or part of this project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts. Packet Pg. 166 CITY OF EDMONDS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT NAME: Outdoor Fitness Zones I ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $175,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Create outdoor fitness zones by adding fitness equipment within the park system. PROJECT BENEFITI RATIONALE: Provide outdoor places to exercise to improve the health and wellness of citizens and park users, which provides adults the opportunity to exercise while their children play. SCHEDULE: 2017-2022 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Construction $175,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL $175,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Packet Pg. 167 CITY OF EDMONDS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT NAME: City Park Storage Building I ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $250,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Construct a new City Park Storage Building PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Construct a new City Park storage building to replace the previous storage building which was destroyed by fire in 2016. SCHEDULE: 2017 - 2022 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Construction $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Packet Pg. 168 CITY OF EDMONDS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT NAME: ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $550,000 Veteran's Plaza PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The establishment of a Veteran's Plaza was unanimously approved by the City Council in 2014. It will serve as a tribute to the patriotic and courageous men and women who served this nation. The Plaza will reflect the bravery, sacrifice and strength they gave our country. The design will accommodate flagpoles (in their existing location), space for display of military seals and a Plaza, seating areas for reflection, some educational monuments or placards, and existing hardscape and significant trees. The address is 250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds, WA 98020 and is adjacent to the Edmonds Public Safety Building. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: The Veteran's Plaza will serve as a focal point which raises awareness of the contributions made by veterans and illustrates the high respect the citizens of Edmonds have for the men and women who have defended the rights and freedoms of this nation. It will provide a tribute for the men and women who have served and are serving in the Armed Forces of the United States. The Plaza will establish a central site for the citizens of Edmonds to conduct official observances, activities and ceremonies to honor veterans including Veterans Day. SCHEDULE: 2017-2021 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Planning/Study -Eng. & Admin. Construction $550,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $550,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 x all or part of this Project may quality for I % for the Arts Packet Pg. 169 UP / CIP COMPARISON (2016 TO 2017) 6.A.c ADDED PROJECTS FUND I PROJECT NAME I UP I DESCRIPTION 112 84th Ave. W Overlay from 220th St. SW to 212th St. SW Complete overlay along 84th Ave. W from 220th St. SW to 212th St. SW 112 220th St. SW Traffic Signal Coordination from Hwy. 99 to 76th Ave. W Improve traffic flow along 220th St. SW from Hwy. 99 to 76th Ave. W with the 112 236th St. SW Walkway from Hwy 99 to 76th Ave. W X Improve pedestrian safety along 236th St. SW from Hwy 99 to 76th Ave. W 112 238th St. SW Walkway from Hwy 99 to 76th Ave. W X Improve pedestrian safety along 238th St. SW from Hwy 99 to 76th Ave. W 112 80th Ave. W / 180th St. SW Walkway from 188th St. SW to OVD X Improve pedestrian safety along 80th / 180th St. SW from 188th St. SW to OVD 112 189th PI. W Walkway from 80th Ave. W to 76th Ave W X Improve pedestrian safety along 89th PI. W from 80th Ave. W to 76th Ave. W 112 15th St. SW Walkway from 8th Ave. S to 9th Ave. S X Improve pedestrian safety along 15th St. SW from 8th Ave. S to 9th Ave. S 112 Maplewood Dr. Walkway from Main St. to 200th St. SW X Improve pedestrian safety along Maplewood Dr. from Main St. to 200th St. SW 112 95th PI. W Walkway from 224th St. SW to 220th St. SW X Improve pedestrian safety along 95th PI. W from 224th St. SW to 220th St. SW 112 Citywide Crossing Enhancement I Improve safety at various pedestrian crossings throughout the City 016 Museum exterior door replacements Replace non -historic doors to comply with historic registry specifications 016 Museum East window replacement double hung sash approved by State Historic Architect 016 Library West deck water seal and repair parking ceiling Waterproof deck and repair pan -deck ceiling at covered parking 016 FAC metal flashing replacement and repair Remove and replace failed metal flashing as needed to eliminate water intrusion 016 PW replace failed insulated window units Replace glazing at failed window units 016 CH replace failed insulated window units Replace glazing at failed window units 016 FAC add building controls to both boiler systems Add Alerton building controls to existing boilers 016 FAC steam radiator retrofits Retrofit steam radiators as needed to replace abandoned or leaking radiators 016 Exterior building washing, sealing and painting Wash seal and paint building exteriors 016 Replace carpeting and flooring Replace warn carpeting and flooring as necessary 016 CH electrical infastructure survey and replacement Survey and replace electrical infastructure at CH, phase 1 of 5 016 Clean and maintenance City facility roofs Cleand inspect and maintain roofs of all City Facilities 016 CH Planned maintenance and replacemnet of HVAC Replace failed HVAC unit and maintain all existing end of life HVAC infastructure. Yearly program 016 Retro comission City building Retro Commission a City building to bring HVAC operation to engineered specifications and optimize DDC system and energy performance. 016 CH heat tape installation Add freeze protection to uninsulated vulnerable water pipes 016 Museum structural analysis of upper fa4ade Analysis of upper fagade structrure since previous stop gap repair measure 016 Failed sash and glazing replacement Replace failed window sash and glazing at various non -historic locations 016 MCH replace damaged and warn flooring at kitchen and entry Replace existing damaged and warn flooring at Kitchen and entry N t rn rn u7 0 N t0 0 N K �L c O N �L E O U a_ U d U- U M C a� E t c� Q c m E t v tv r r Q Page 1 of 4 Packet Pg. 170 125 Civic Center Grand stand removal x Consistent with Civic planning process, master plan 125 Community Garden Consistent with PROS plan. 125 City Park Storage buidling Replacement from fire. 125 Waterfront Redevelopment/Walkway completion Consistent with PROS plan. 125 Upgrade Curb Ramps to ADA Stds 12017 Project budget will be funded by REET 2 revenue. 125 Audible Pedestrian Signals 2017 Project budget will be funded by REET 2 revenue. 125 Minor Sidewalk Program 2017 Project budget will be funded by REET 2 revenue. 126 Hwy 99 Gateway / Revitalization (Access Management) 1 12017 Project budget will be funded by REET 1 revenue. 126 220th St. Signal Coordination 1 12017 Project budget will be funded by REET 1 revenue. 132 Civic Stadium Demolition Consistent with PROS plan, master plan 132 Waterfront Revel opment/Walkway Completion Consistient with PROS plan 132 Community Garden Consistent with PROS plan. 132 City Park Storage buidling Replacement from fire. 421 2023 Replacement Program Estimated future costs for waterline replacements. 421 2017 Waterline Overlays Estimated future costs for road repairs due to waterline replacements. 423 2023 Sewer Replacement/Rehab/Improvements Estimated future costs for sewerline replacements/rehab/impr. 423 2017 Sewerline Overlays Estimated future costs for road repairs due to sewerline repl/rehab/impr. 6.A.c Page 2 of 4 Packet Pg. 171 UP / CIP COMPARISON (2016 TO 2017) 6.A.c DELETED PROJECTS I CFP I DESCRIPTION FUND PROJECT NAME 112 Five Corners Roundabout X Completed in 2016 112 Arterial Street Signal Coordination Identified as 220th St. SW Traffic Signal Coordination from Hwy 99 to 76th Ave. W. 112 Citywide Protective / Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion Completed in 2016 112 Type 2 Pavement Markers Project to be addressed as part of future overlay projects 112 15th St. SW from Edmonds Way to 8th Ave. S X lCompleted in 2016 112 Transportation Plan Update Completed in 2015 112 SR-104 Transportation Corridor Study Completed in 2015 112 Traffic Calming Program X Non -growth related project 016 Council/Court Chamber AV upgrade Audio Visual upgrade project 016 MCH gutter replacement Replacement of rain gutters 016 Estimate of CH security needs Estimate and survey of necessary security upgrades 016 FAC spot flooring replacement in Beach Ranger office Replace carpeting at Ranger offices 016 FS16 Generator replacement Replace emergency generator at FS 421 2014 Replacement Program Completed in 2015. 421 2015 Waterline Overlays I Completed in 2015. 422 Improvements - Dayton 3rd to 9th This project was combined with the waterline/sewerline project that covers that same area. 422 Storm System Video Assessment Deleted. This project will be covered as part of operations and maintenance. Operations and maintenance will do this work as part of their operations and maintenance tasks. 423 2015 Sewerline Overlays Completed in 2015. 423 Lift Stations 3,4,5,9,10,11,12,14,15 Completed in 2015. 423 Phase 1 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Completed in 2015. 423 Phase 2 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Completed in 2015. Page 3 of 4 Packet Pg. 172 CFP / CIP COMPARISON (2016 TO 2017) 6.A.c CHANGED PROJECTS FUND PROJECT NAME CFP CHANGE 016 CH security upgrades SecurityUpgrades on hold until recommendations and estimate arrive. 423.76 Repair and Replacement The Secondary Clarifier #3 Structural Repair contract was awarded in 2016. The contractor will not be able to complete the work by the Oct. 2016 so the project may need to be extended. Pagoda repairs have been placed on hold for time being. 423.76 Upgrades Offsite Flow Telemetry project was completed in 2016. The Control System Upgrade will replace aging control system equipment, provide for redundancy and upgrade the operating platform. The 600 PLC is the final element and is scheduled for spring 2017. The project completion was pushed back in order to coordinate work with Phase 5 Energy Project. The SSI project is on hold awaiting EPA approval to install and test the mercury modules. We continue to report compliance status on a monthly basis. The Phase 4 energy improvement project is in close out. The Phase 5 Energy Improvement project has been started. By the end of 2016 the solids conveyor and sludge hopper should be upgraded and the new 126 HP blower has been installed. The project has given us the opportunity to optimize the aeration control system. 423.76 Studies and Consulting In the future we will be to study Peracetic Acid disinfection however this may put off until 2018. JE M rn LO r r 0 N co 0 N K �L tv c O N E O U a_ U a U- U ai r c a� E t c� tc Q c m E t v tv r r Q Page 4 of 4 Packet Pg. 173 8.A Planning Board Agenda Item Meeting Date: 10/12/2016 2016 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Staff Lead: Rob Chave / Brad Shipley Department: Planning Division Prepared By: Rob Chave Background/History The current comprehensive plan was adopted in 2015. Staff Recommendation Prepare for the upcoming public hearing. Narrative The most recent comprehensive plan update was completed in 2015, which was a major review required by the Growth Management Act. Typically, the City undertakes relatively minor amendments in intervening years. The Capital Facilities Plan is reviewed and updated each year. This year there are also a few minor amendments (see the summary in Attachment 1). Amendments 1a, 1b and 1c involve minor amendments to the Parks, Recreation & Open Space (PROS) Plan. Amendment 2 is an amendment to the text of the Capital Facilities Element which would add an implementation action (similar to other plan elements). In addition, there are a couple of more substantial amendments that are being developed; these will be ready for Planning Board consideration after the first of the year (i.e. in early 2017). These are also indicated in the attached summary. The additional attachments show the actual drafts of the current amendment proposals. These will be the subject of an upcoming public hearing by the Board. Attachments: Attachment 1: Summary of 2016 Comprehensive Plan Updates Attachment 2: PROS Plan Amendment 1a (new Appendix D) Attachment 3: PROS Plan Amendment 1b (Appendix A) Attachment 4: PROS Plan Amendment 1c (Policy 4.1-1) Attachment 5: Capital Facilities Element implementation action Packet Pg. 174 8.A.a 2016-2017 Comprehensive Plan Updates 1. Parks Plan amendments recognizing the Marina Beach Master Plan. a. Include the adopted Marina Beach Master Plan as a new "Appendix D" to the PROS Plan. b. Modify the PROS Plan, Appendix A, pg. 39, as follows: Under "Site considerations," replace the last bullet with "See Appendix D, Marina Beach Master Plan" Under "Planned Improvements," replace the first bullet with "Implement the Master Plan" c. Modify PROS Plan, Goal 4, Policy 4.1-1, pg. 4-8, to reflect adopted plans and codes: Current: "Relocate incompatible uses from sensitive areas (i.e., waterfront dog park at Marina Beach Park)." Replace with: "Ensure uses in environmentally sensitive areas are consistent with critical area regulations and the Shoreline Master Program." 2. Capital Facilities Element Add an implementation action to the Capital Facilities Element (Comprehensive Plan pg. 144): "Develop level of service standards for key public facilities by the end of 2017 and consider including the standards in the Comprehensive Plan." 3. Water Comprehensive Plan Plan is being developed with a draft due before the end of the year (2016). Approval is scheduled for first quarter 2017. Any specific references to the current (2010) plan will also need to be updated. 4. Street Tree Plan Plan is being developed with a draft due around the end of the year (2016). Approval is scheduled for first quarter 2017. Any specific references to the current plan will also need to be updated. Packet Pg. 175 8.A.b APPENDIX D: MARINA BEACH MASTER PLAN EDMONDS PARKS, RECREATION AND CULTURAL SERVICES c a� E c a� E a a L Q E 0 V 0 N w 6D Lo Z. Packet Pg. 176 8.A.b [Include Adopted Marina Beach Master Plan here] Packet Pg. 177 City of Edmonds Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan 8.A.c Marina Beach Park Regional Park 200 400 Feet Park Features • 3.37 Acres • 0.5 Miles walking trail • Playground • Sand volleyball court • Small boat launch (ramp) • View point • Portable restrooms (3) • Shoreline access, gravel beach • Off -leash dog area Site considerations _ _ ' `'I ...- • Zoned Commercial Waterfront - r "--- _g • Marine Protected Area • 31 additional parking stalls provided by Port of Edmonds under SEPA/SMP approval permit Replace with: "See Appendix D, Marina Beach Master Plan" • Likely to be improved by creek daylighting Planned Improvements Replace with: "Implement Master Plan" • Site master plan and implementation • Restroom (large) • Replace play area (large) • Continued maintenance Appendix A: Existing System A-39 E ;_ a a L Q I_ 0 U m r O N W CD LO r Packet Pg. 178 8.A.d City of Edmonds Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan 3.J Use the opportunity of upgrades and maintenance at the Senior Center site to integrate the property more completely with the rest of the waterfront. 3.K Secure ongoing funding for the Beach Ranger program, recognizing the important role in tourism, building a connection to the shoreline and expanding appreciation for natural resources and habitat conservation. Goal 4: Natural Resource and Habitat Conservation 4.A Inventory and classify natural resources and habitat areas within of the park system. 4.B Conduct a city tree inventory and map to create a baseline of information to enhance tree canopy. 4.0 Connect new generations of residents and visitors to natural resources in Edmonds through Discovery Programs utilizing ranger naturalists. 4.D Collaborate on public information programs to help property owners (including the City) identify and remove invasive vegetation. 4.E Collaborate with various organizations in invasive plant removal and native vegetation planting in accord with landscaping plans for parks within the city limits. Suggest park maintenance projects that would be good candidates for the annual Arbor Day event sponsored by the Tree Board. 4.F Provide low impact access to natural resource areas to allow for enjoyment and interaction with nature. 4.G Steward the urban forest using appropriate maintenance of street and park trees, clear removal and replacement policies and providing information about urban forestry to property owners. 4. H Relocate incompatible uses from sensitive areas (i.e. waterfront dog park at Marina Beach Park). 4.1 Consider expanding the function and facilities around the Willow Creek Hatchery to create a more expansive interpretive center that includes the Edmonds Marsh. 4.H Ensure uses in environmentally sensitive areas are consistent with critical area regulations and the Shoreline Master Program. 4-8 Chapter 4: Action Plan Packet Pg. 179 8.A.e Capital Facilities Element Background General. The Capital Facilities Element identifies the City's existing and needed capital facilities to support the delivery of public services to the community and its visitors. It also provides related goals and standards for meeting the community's needs. Capital facilities include land and buildings for public purpose. In addition to serving existing residents, capital facilities are planned to meet the community's needs as new development occurs in the future. Because Edmonds is a mature city with a full complement of facilities and services, most capital facility planning is targeted to maintaining existing level of service standards and expanding the quality of life of its citizens with new or expanded facilities. Service standards are described in the transportation, utility and parks elements. These service standards are used to assist in developing both short and long range capital improvements projects. The capital facilities element identifies these projects and their funding sources for a six -year period. This schedule will be updated on an annual basis and integrated with the City's budget process. The element also identifies public facility needs for the 20-year planning period. Funding sources will vary as specific projects are developed, and will include a variety of public and private sources. The City coordinates on the siting of essential public facilities with its neighboring cities and the county. Coneurreney Management. Introduced in 1990 by the Washington State Legislature with the enactment of the Growth Management Act, the term "concurrency management" is specifically required for transportation facilities and is defined as the process that cities use to ensure that no development or permit is approved by the city unless the necessary capital facilities are in place or that funding is adequate to complete the required improvements within six years. Concurrency for transportation systems is tied to established level -of -service standards. The City has also established an impact fee system for parks in order to provide for growth -related facilities. Other facilities, such as water and sewer systems, are funded and maintained through utility plans and fee structures, as well as grant -supported projects. Inventory. Publicly owned capital facilities in the City are comprised primarily of those owned by the City of Edmonds. A few of these facilities, while owned by the City, are operated by other entities. For example, fire stations are currently owned by the City but operated by Fire District 1. Other facilities are owned by different governmental agencies, such as the Port of Edmonds and the Edmonds School District. Following is a map and list of public -owned capitial facilities, as identified in 2015. This inventory focuses on larger properties and buildings; it does not include transportation or utility facilities, since these are discussed, repectively, in the Comprehensive Plan's Transportation Element and in functional plans referenced in the Comprehensive Plan's Utilities Element. Capital Facilities 137 Packet Pg. 180 8.A.e Note: While City -owned parks are included in this Element's inventory, more specific details about them can be found in the Parks Recreation and Open Space Plan, which is also adopted as an element of the Comprehensive Plan. City of Edmonds Public Capital ap i I M I p Legend — City 8—dary Police Fire Staflon • City Hall Edmonds Public Facilities Distract Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Puget Sound - C1ty Parks Other Public Parks gyp, e Edmonds School District PlayiIields - Pon of Edmonds - Stevens Hospital ,� s - Public Hospital District $2 - Dept- of Natural Re50uros 8 - Dept. of Fish & Wildlife - City of Edmonds Property - SnoCo Housing Authority Edmonds Community College Pl a '"�, • 41F C , R a ` -------------------- x E 0 0-25 0.5 1 Miles N I I Figure 41: Public Capital Facilities Map Capital Facilities 138 Packet Pg. 181 8.A.e Following is a 2015 map of facilities owned by the Edmonds School District (ESD). { �.. City of Edmonds e School Facilities Map EDMONDS SCHOOL DISTRICT PROPERTIES OTHER EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES Elementary Schools 22 - St. Thomas 23 - Maplewood Park Elementary 1 - Meadowdale Elementary 24 - Melody Hill 2 - Seaview Elementary 25 - Woodway Elementary 1 3 - Chase Lake Elementary 26 - Holy Rosary 4 - Edmonds Elementary 27 - Edmonds Community College :13 15. 5 - Sherwood Elementary j 6 - Maplewood Parent Cooperative (K-8) 7 - Madrona School (K-8) ` ro 8- Westgate Elementary 22 9- Lynndale Elementary 10 - College Place Elementary 11 - Maplewood Center (K-12) '- t% 23 12 - Edmonds Homeschool Resource Center (K-12) Middle Schools 13 - Meadowdale Middle School - 14 - College Place Middle School High Schools j 2 t9 15 - Meadowdale High School 16 - Edmonds-Woodway High School 17 - Schriber Lake High School Other Properties Z4 18 - Civic Center Playfield �...,,. e a 6:11 .27 19 - Chase Lake Natural Area 20 - Meadowdale Rayfields .:26 21- Administrative Services M. :10 21 �3 16 24 r2 7 t r 25 0 0 1 0.5 1 Miles I I i i i Legend City Boundary Z School Figure 42: School Facilities Map Capital Facilities Public School Sites = ESD 15 Playfields 139 Packet Pg. 182 8.A.e Following is a list ofpublicly-ownedfacilities in Edmonds and other nearby areas. x P x 6 m 9 t m V _E t Name Neighborhood Parks 9 m' C p3 Name Other City Owned Facilities m' C p Elm Street Park 1.85 CoE Log Cabin Visitor Center/Chamberof Commerce 0.03 372 CoE Frances Anderson Center Field 1.94 CoE City Hall 0.59 34,074 CoE Haines Wharf 0.69 CoE Edmonds Historical Museum 0.12 2,084 CoE Hickman Park 5.6 CoE Edmonds Library and Plaza Room 3.03 19,520 CoE Hummingbird Hill Park 1.22 CoE Fire Station#16 10,700 CoE Mathay Ballinger Park 0.51 CoE Fire Station #17 9,800 CoE Pine Street Park 1.47 CoE Fire Station #20 6,400 CoE Seaview Park 6.05 CoE Fishing Pier Ranger Station 1,200 CoE Sierra Park 5.52 CoE Fishing Pier Restroom 918 CoE Subtotal 24.85 Frances Anderson Center Karlsten House 0.22 55,000 2,250 CoE CoE Community Parks City Park 13.96 CoE "Old" Public Works 3.94 14,100 CoE Yost Memorial Park 44.14 CoE Sewage Treatment Plant 115,200 CoE Pool 4,808 CoE Public Safety Complex 2.61 30,940 CoE Subtotal 58.1 4.808 Public Works Operation and Maintenance Center 4.35 28,000 CoE Wade James Theatre 2.34 6,289 CoE Regional Parks 144 Railroad Ave Tidelands 0.9 CoE Subtotal Edmonds School District Properties in Edmonds 17.23 336,847 Brakett's Landing North 5.11 CoE Civic Center Playfield 7.92 ESD 15 Brakett's Landing South 2.22 CoE Edmonds Senior Center 2.63 CoE Boys and Girls Club 6,856 ESD 15 Marina Beach Park 3.37 CoE Stadium 7,140 ESD 15 Olympic Beach Park 2.82 CoE Skate Park 6,000 ESD 15 SubtotalI 17.05L Chase Lake Elementary School Edmonds Elementary School 10.26 8.58 57,697 34,726 ESD 15 ESD 15 Special- Parks Centenial Plaza 0.08 CoE Edmonds-Woodway High School 30.19 208,912 ESD 15 Dayton Street Plaza 0.1 CoE Former Woodway High School 39.75 148,740 ESD 15 Edmonds Library & Plaza Room 1.29 CoE Edmonds Homeschool Resource(K-12) Edmonds Memorial Cemetary and Columbarium 6.63 CoE Schriber Lake High School Anderson Center Field 1.62 CoE Madrona School(K-8) 31.3 85,505 ESD 15 Hazal Miller Plaza 0.09 CoE I Maplewood Parent Cooperative (K-8) 7.41 76,554 ESD 15 Interurban Trail 4.88 CoE Maplewood Center(K-12) ESD 15 Lake Ballinger Access 0.19 CoE Seaview Elementary 8.28 49,420 ESD 15 Meadowdale Community Clubhouse 0.99 3,232 CoE Sherwood Elementary 13.19 43,284 ESD 15 Richard F. Anway Park 0.17 CoE Westgate Elementary 8.34 44,237 ESD 15 Ocean Avenue Viewpoint 0.2 CoE Woodway Elementary 9.89 37,291 ESD 15 Point Edwards Scenic Overlook(easement) 0.1 CoE ubtotal 175.11 769,071 Stamm Overlook Park 0.36 CoE Edmonds School District Properties Near Edmonds hase Lake Natural Area 10.8 ESD 15 Sunset Ave. Overlook 1.14 CoEJo Willow Creek Hatchery and Interpretive Center 1.68 CoEollege Place Elementary 9 48,180 Subtotal 19.52 3,232llege Place Middle School 18.7 87,031 Open Space Lynndale Elementary School 10 39,043 Edmonds Marsh/Walkway 23.37 CoE Meadowdale High School 39.56 197,306 ESD 15 Edmonds Marsh East 0.85 CoE Meadowdale Middle School 19.38 102,925 ESD 15 H.O. Hutt Park 4.53 CoE Meadowdale Elementary 8.78 57,111 ESD 15 Haines Tdelands 0.44 CoE Meadowdale Playfields 24.09 ESD 15 Maplewood Hill Park 9.96 CoE Subtotal 140.31 531,596 Meadowdale Natural Area 1.07 CoE Other Publicly Owned Facilities in Edmonds Edmonds Centerforthe Arts 2.54 PFD Olympic View Open Space 0.49 CoE Pine Ridge Park 23.78 CoE Edmonds Conference Center 0.33 11,252 EDCC Seaview Corridor 1.31 CoE Edmonds Fishing Pier 0.61 WDFW Shell Creek Open Space 1.04 CoE Edmonds Underwater Park and Higgins Trails 33.21 DNR Wharf Street 0.12 CoE Olympic View Water District Maintenance Facility 0.83 7,480 OVWD Willow Creek Park 2.25 CoE Public Utility District#1 0.68 PUD Subtotal Port of Edmonds Properties 69.21 Subtotal Other Publicly Owned Facilities Near Edmonds 38.2 18,732 Marina 8.1 PoE Ballinger Playfield and Former Golf Course 52.59 MLT Waterfront Businesses 14.22 Po Esperance County Park 9.59 SnoCo Harbor Square Business Complex 15.11 PoE Meadowdale Beach County Park 144.34 SnoCo Subtotal 37.43 South County Park 118.55 SnoCo Subtotal 325.07 Figure 43: List of Publicly -owned Capital Facilities Capital Facilities 140 Packet Pg. 183 8.A.e Future Needs Future capital facility needs and projects have been identified for the City in a special section "Capital Facilities Projects" at the end of this element. The section is divided into three subsections: General, Transportation, and Stormwater. Within each subsection is a table of capital projects and their anticipated financing over a six -year period. Each section also contains information on longer -term capital projects, for which funding may not yet be available. Some of the projects in the latter category have been considered for an extended period of time and their exact descriptions/costs have not been recently updated. The Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Plan, adopted as an element of the Comprehensive Plan, includes more information on future capital facility needs for parks, recreation, and open space. Capital Facilities Goals & Policies This section identifies key goals for the City in managing its capital facilities. Each key goal in this element (or section) is identified by an alphabet letter (for example, "D"). Goals are typically followed by associated policies and these are identified by the letter of the goal and a sequential number (for example, "D.2") Capital Facilities Goal A. Establish service standards for all city -provided services in order to provide public facilities and services that meet citizens' needs and enhance the community's quality of life. A.1 Provide capital facility improvements in order to meet or exceed established service standards. A.2 Coordinate and set service standards that meet the goals and policies of the comprehensive plan. A.3 Evaluate and prioritize capital facility projects according to how they achieve established criteria and the goals and policies of the comprehensive plan. Examples of typical criteria include the following: A.3.a. Whether the project is needed to achieve or maintain a service standard. A.3.b. Whether the facility will contribute to the elimination of a public hazard or safety concern. A.3.c. Whether the facility is financially feasible. A.3.d. The extent to which the facility will impact annual and long-term budgets. A.3.e. Whether the facility is consistent with future facility needs and site considerations. A.3.f. The extent to which the facility will impact natural and cultural resources. Capital Facilities 141 Packet Pg. 184 8.A.e Capital Facilities Goal B. Evaluate and coordinate the provision of capital facility improvements with both annual budgeting and long-term financial planning. B.1. Capital budget decisions will be made consistent with the Edmonds comprehensive plan in accordance with RCW 36.70A.120. B.2. If probable funding falls short of meeting identified needs, the comprehensive plan shall be re-examined to review how additional funding will be raised, or how land use assumptions will be reassessed to ensure that established service standards will be met. B.3. Capital improvements will be planned to achieve fiscal responsibility, maintenance of existing facilities, and protect the quality of life of the community. BA The City will continue to adopt multi -year budgets and six -year capital improvement programs as part of its annual budget and planning process. B.5. Six -year capital improvement programs will be coordinated with long-term (at least 20-year) capital needs Capital Facilities Goal C. Seek to use a coordinated array of mechanisms and sources of revenue to fund needed capital facilities. C.1. Make use of the City's budget and structure of funds to identify adequate funding sources for capital facilities. C.2. Seek grants and cooperative funding agreements to supplement internal City funding of capital facilities that benefit the general public or that are required to meet needs not generated solely by Edmonds residents. C.3. Make use of regulatory and incentive programs to assist in achieving service standards for City services. Capital Facilities Goal D. Strategically locate new facilities to complement the delivery of services and provide for efficient and convenient access. D.1. The location of new or improved capital facilities should take into account existing service delivery systems and the location and access of service populations. D.2. Ensure that the siting of essential public facilities is not precluded by the implementation of this Comprehensive Plan. Capital Facilities Goal E. Essential public facilities are necessary to support orderly growth and the delivery of public services. The City's goal is to ensure that these facilities are sited in an efficient, timely manner while acknowledging and mitigating any community impacts created by these facilities. E.I. Essential public facilities are those defined by state law, through the City's planning process or on application of a service provider. Capital Facilities 142 Packet Pg. 185 8.A.e E.2. Sponsors of essential public facilities should be encouraged to consult with the City prior to choosing a site in order to seek information about potential sites, provide information concerning project proposals, identify potential community impacts, and propose possible siting incentives or mitigation measures. E.3. The City shall assure adequate public notice and participation in the siting of essential public facilities by reviewing these facilities through a conditional use process, allowing the identification of community impacts and mitigation measures. Because the City's normal notification requirements may not provide for adequate public notice to the project's impact area, the project sponsor shall develop a public participation plan designed to encourage early public involvement in the siting decision and identification of impacts and mitigation measures. EA. The City shall develop decision criteria for the siting of essential public facilities which allow the sponsor to demonstrate: EA.a. the need for the facility, EA.b. its consistency with adopted plans and policies, EA.c. its location is designed to serve its service population, EA.d. its location criteria is compatible with the siting of other essential public facilities, EA.e. the site is physically suitable for the facility, and EA.f. the project is able to mitigate community impacts. E.5. City policies and procedures — including any conditional use process — shall be interpreted and administered in accordance with the admonition contained in the Growth Management Act that no development plan or development regulation may preclude the siting of essential public facilities. Concurrency Management Goal F. Provide a system of concurrency management that will assure that the facilities needed to support city services are provided in a timely and coordinated manner. F.1. For transportation facilities, assure that the facilities or services needed to meet level -of -service standards are in place at the time of development, or assure that a financial commitment is in place to complete the improvements or strategies within six years. These facilities or services must be provided by either the City or the appropriate public or private developer. F.2 For park facilities, new growth or development will create additional demand for park facilities. Fees collected from the "Park Impact Fee" can only be appied to projects resulting from city-wide development growth and cannot be used to mitigate existing shortfalls of the parks system. Capital Facilities 143 Packet Pg. 186 8.A.e Implementation Actions and Performance Measures Implementation actions are steps that are intended to be taken within a specified timeframe to address high priority sustainability goals. In addition, the Comprehensive Plan contains a small number performance measures (no more than one per element) that can be used to monitor and annually report on the implementation and effectiveness of the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan contains a small number performance measures (no more than one per element) that can be used to monitor and annually report on the implementation and effectiveness of the Comprehensive Plan. Performance measures, as identified in the Comprehensive Plan, are specific, meaningful, and easily obtainable items that relate to sustainability and can be reported on an annual basis. They are intended to help assess progress toward achieving the goals and policy direction of each major Comprehensive Plan element. The measure identified below is specifically called out as matching the above criteria and being important to capital facilities goals and will be reported annually, along with performance measures for other Comprehensive Plan elements. It is not intended to be the only measure that the City may use for capital facilities purposes. Implementation Action: Develop level of service standards for key public facilities by the end of 2017 and consider including the standards in the Comprehensive Plan. Performance Measure: Project delivery results - based on comparing projects in the Capital Facilities Plan to what is actually done on the projects. Capital Facilities 144 Packet Pg. 187 9.A Planning Board Agenda Item Meeting Date: 10/12/2016 Planning Board Extended Agenda Staff Lead: Shane Hope, Director Department: Planning Board Prepared By: Diane Cunningham Background/History N/A Staff Recommendation N/A Narrative Extended agenda is attached. Attachments: 10-12-2016 PB Extended Agenda Packet Pg. 188 O F PLANNING BOAPn n c. 1800 Extended Agenda October 12, 2016 Meeting Item OCTOBER 2016 9.A.a Items and Dates are subject to change Oct. 12 1. CIP/CFP Public Hearing & Recommendation 2. Update and discussion on Comprehensive Plan Amendments (Parks, Highway 99, Water— 2016 & 2017) Oct. 26 1. Update on Highway 99 Subarea Plan 2. Presentation on Sound Transit 3 (ST3) NOVEMBER 2016 Nov. 9 1. Public Hearing/Discussion on Civic Center Master Plan 2. Public Hearing on 2016 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Nov. 23 Cancelled — Holiday DECEMBER 2016 Dec. 14 1. Public Hearing on the Draft Highway 99 Area Plan 2. Election of Officers 3. Presentation on UW/Forterra plan for Five Corners Dec. 28 Cancelled — Holiday Q Packet Pg. 189 items ana liates are 9.A.a to change Pending 1. Community Development Code Re -Organization 2016 2. Neighborhood Center Plans and zoning implementation, including: ✓ Five Corners 3. Further Highway 99 Implementation, including: ✓ Potential for "urban center" or transit -oriented design/development strategies ✓ Parking standards 4. Exploration of incentive zoning and incentives for sustainable development Current Priorities 1. Neighborhood Center Plans & implementation. 2. Highway 99 Implementation. Recurring 1. Annual Adult Entertainment Report (January -February as necessary) Topics 2. Election of Officers (1s' meeting in December) 3. Parks & Recreation Department Quarterly Report (January, April, July, October) 4. Quarterly report on wireless facilities code updates (as necessary) Packet Pg. 190