Loading...
2017-06-28 Planning Board Packet�1 o� NJI Agenda Edmonds Planning Board "" Ixyo COUNCIL CHAMBERS 250 5TH AVE NORTH, EDMONDS, WA 98020 J U N E 28, 2017, 7:00 PM 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. Approval of Draft Minutes: June 14, 2017 3. ANNOUNCEMENT OF AGENDA 4. AUDIENCE COMMENTS 5. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS A. Development Services Director Report 6. PUBLIC HEARINGS 7. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 8. NEW BUSINESS A. Presentation of 2017 Comprehensive Water System Plan B. Review of Draft Planned Action Code Language 9. PLANNING BOARD EXTENDED AGENDA A. Review of Extended Agenda 10. PLANNING BOARD CHAIR COMMENTS 11. PLANNING BOARD MEMBER COMMENTS 12. ADJOURNMENT Edmonds Planning Board Agenda June 28, 2017 Page 1 2.A Planning Board Agenda Item Meeting Date: 06/28/2017 Approval of Draft Minutes: June 14, 2017 Staff Lead: N/A Department: Planning Division Prepared By: Diane Cunningham Background/History N/A Staff Recommendation Review and approve the draft minutes Narrative Draft minutes are attached. Attachments: PB170614d Packet Pg. 2 2.A.a CITY OF EDMONDS PLANNING BOARD MINUTES June 14, 2017 Vice Chair Monroe called the meeting of the Edmonds Planning Board to order at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, Public Safety Complex, 250 — 5" Avenue North. BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT Nathan Monroe, Vice Chair Matthew Cheung Todd Cloutier Phil Lovell Daniel Robles Mike Rosen BOARD MEMBERS ABSENT Alicia Crank (excused) Carreen Rubenkonig (excused) STAFF PRESENT Rob Chave, Planning Division Manager Carrie Hite, Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services Director Jerrie Bevington, Video Recorder Karin Noyes, Recorder Newly appointed Board Member, Mike Rosen, was welcomed to the Board. READING/APPROVAL OF MINUTES BOARD MEMBER LOVELL MOVED THAT THE MINUTES OF MAY 24, 2017 BE APPROVED AS CORRECTED. BOARD MEMBER ROBLES SECONDED THE MOTION, WHICH CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. ANNOUNCEMENT OF AGENDA The agenda was accepted as presented. AUDIENCE COMMENTS No one in the audience indicated a desire to comment during this portion of the meeting. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR REPORT TO PLANNING BOARD Vice Chair Monroe referred the Board to the written report that was provided by the Development Services Director. Board Member Lovell observed that the June 2nd Affordable Housing Conference attracted a large number of participants, including some Planning Board Members. Packet Pg. 3 2.A.a PUBLIC HEARING ON REZONE OF PROPERTY WITHIN THE HIGHWAY 99 PLANNED ACTION AREA TO GENERAL COMMERCIAL (CG) Mr. Chave provided two maps, one illustrating the existing zoning along the Highway 99 Corridor, and the other illustrating the proposed zoning. He noted that the Board is generally familiar with the proposal, which is a legislative rather than a quasi-judicial action because it would apply area wide. He reviewed that the Planning Board previously considered the Highway 99 Subarea Plan and forwarded a recommendation of approval to the City Council. In addition, the Board conducted a public hearing on May loth on amendments to the development regulations to establish new standards for a consolidated CG zone in the Highway 99 area. The proposed zoning changes were shown as part of the Board's May loth hearing presentation. Following the public hearing relative to the rezone proposal, the Board will be asked to forward a recommendation of approval to the City Council. The City Council is scheduled to conduct a public hearing next week on both the zoning code and the map. Mr. Chave reviewed that, through the Planned Action process, the City is working to consolidate the zoning throughout the Highway 99 area. Historically, the properties have been zoned both CG and CG2, but there is very little difference between the two zones except for the height limit. Currently, the CG zone allows a maximum height of 60 feet, and the CG2 zone allows a maximum height of 75 feet. The proposed rezone would make the overall zoning along the corridor consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Map, which designates the entire corridor for a consistent development pattern. Through the Planned Action process, the properties that are currently zoned CG and CG2 would be consolidated into a single CG zone, and new standards and design parameters would apply. The proposed action would bring all zoning into consistency with the Comprehensive Plan and the Highway 99 Subarea Plan. In addition to consolidating the CG and CG2 zoning, the proposal would also rezone some properties that are currently zoned Multi -Family Residential (RM) to CG. He explained that, in some cases, commercial property owners also own the adjacent RM-zoned property, which means that the zoning is split in some cases. The intent is to consolidate these RM-zoned properties into the CG zone. In addition to providing greater consistency, the new CG zone has built-in transition standards. For example, combined stepbacks and setbacks are not required in the current CG zone, but would be added as part of the new standards and design parameters. The thought is that some of the transition issues could be handled via the zoning standards rather than through transitional zoning areas. Mr. Chave recalled that when the Board previously conducted a public hearing on development code amendments to implement the Highway 99 Subarea Plan, some of the comments were related to the anticipated CG zoning changes. Tonight's hearing offers a formal opportunity for the public to comment specifically on the rezone proposal. Following the public hearing and Planning Board deliberation, the Board will be asked to forward a recommendation to the City Council. Board Member Lovell pointed out that each of the maps identify the properties located within the City of Edmonds, as well as those located within unincorporated Snohomish County (Esperance). Mr. Chave emphasized that the proposal would not change the zoning in the properties located in unincorporated Snohomish County. Board Member Lovell said it is important to make sure the Board Members understand that the current CG zoning allows a maximum height of 60 feet and the current CG2 zoning allows a maximum height of 75 feet. As proposed, the CG and CG2 zones would be consolidated and the maximum height would be 75 feet along the entire corridor. Mr. Chave pointed out that the only reason for the two zones (CG and CG2) was to follow through on the distinctions made by Snohomish County prior to when the properties were annexed into the City. Vice Chair Monroe pointed out that there are slivers of white area on the two zoning maps. Mr. Chave responded that these identify City rights -of -way, which are considered un-zoned properties. Stanley Piha, Edmonds, said he participated on the original Highway 99 Task Force and he also owns property within the Highway 99 Subarea. He commented that the evolution of the proposed Highway 99 Subarea Plan meets many of the goals and objectives brought forward by the original task force a number of years ago. He said he supports the good work done by the consultant and City staff and felt the plan would offer an opportunity for a wonderful transformation to occur along the Edmonds portion of Highway 99. He encouraged the Board to recommend approval of the proposed rezone as presented by staff. Planning Board Minutes June 14, 2017 Page 2 Packet Pg. 4 No one else in the audience indicated a desire to comment and the public portion of the hearing was closed. BOARD MEMBER LOVELL MOVED THAT THE BOARD ACCEPT THE FINDINGS OF FACT, ANALYSIS AND ATTACHMENTS IN THE STAFF REPORT AND FORWARD A RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE PROPOSED REZONE OF PROPERTIES WITHIN THE HIGHWAY 99 PLANNED ACTION AREA. BOARD MEMBER CHEUNG SECONDED THE MOTION, WHICH CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. UPDATE FROM THE PARKS, RECREATION AND CULTURAL SERVICES DIRECTOR Ms. Hite provided an overview of Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services projects that have been done or are in progress. Civic Field Acquisition and Master Plan. The City purchased the Civic Field from the Edmonds School District in February of 2016, and this was followed by a robust community process, working with consultant Walker Macy, to create a master plan for the site. An advisory committee was formed to provide guidance to the consultant and staff, and the Planning Board played an integral part in the process, as well. The final Civic Field Master Plan is a culmination of a very robust public conversation, with a lot of give and take and compromise. The goal moving forward is to complete the survey and geotechnical work this year. Staff recently sent out a notice to tenants of the stadium advising that they must vacate their space by October 31st. The plan is to take down the facility in November. Monies will be built into the 2018 Capital Improvement Plan for design development work, and staff will also prepare a financial package for the park's redevelopment, including grant applications. Implementation of the plan is anticipated to cost about $10 million, and it is hoped that construction work can start in 2020 or before. City Park. The spray pad at City Park opened on May 26th. The weather was awesome, and the facility was packed. It continues to be very popular. To mitigate noise for the neighbors, the City planted a number of trees and additional foliage. Staff has received a lot of favorable comments about the new facility. Board Member Lovell asked if the water retention/recirculation system is working as planned, and Ms. Hite answered affirmatively. Rather than the direct -to - drain approach, the new spray pad uses a water recycling system. The system is backwashed once each week to clean it out and start with fresh water, and the Public Health Department has given it a clean bill of health. • Dayton Street Plaza. A ribbon -cutting ceremony for the Dayton Street Plaza was held in April. This gathering area which includes public art in the downtown allows people to have a resting/stopping spot when walking from downtown to the waterfront. There have been informal performances in the plaza area, as well. • 4`h Avenue Cultural Corridor Interim Projects. The artwork, Luminous Forest, was dedicated in conjunction with the Edmonds Center for the Arts (ECA)'s IOth Anniversary celebration in July of 2016. The artwork leads walkers from Main Street to the ECA. • Wayfinding Signage/Park Signage. The existing wayfinding sign at 5th and Main Street is scheduled for replacement in 2017, and the new sign will be consistent with the current sign program standards. New signs were installed at Yost Park and Maplewood Park, and the City has received a number of favorable comments from the public. The Parks Department will continue to update wayfinding and park signage as time allows. She noted that the old sign at Yost Park was donated to the Edmonds Museum. • Marina Beach. The Marina Beach Master Plan was adopted in February of 2016 following a robust public process. The purpose of the plan was to find a route for Willow Creek to come across the parkland. Parallel to the Master Plan work, the City is working on a proposal to daylight Willow Creek. However, there is no funding set aside for the Master Plan implementation, which will not likely occur for at least five years. Board Member Lovell asked about the City's plans for sequencing major projects. Ms. Hite answered that Civic Field will likely remain the first priority if the City is successful in reaching its financial goals. The project to daylight Willow Creek will not likely be ready to submit for grant funding until the 2018 cycle, and construction will not likely occur until at least 2020. The daylighting project will be done in conjunction with implementation of the Marina Beach Master Plan, and the total cost of the two projects is estimated to be between $6 and $10 million. There have been extensive discussions about looking for federal grant funding, which depends on the environment at the federal level for parks grants and salmon rehabilitation. Board Planning Board Minutes June 14, 2017 Page 3 Packet Pg. 5 0 Member Lovell pointed out that the City is in the process of doing drainage work in the area. Ms. Hite explained that there are several solutions associated improving drainage in the area, and daylighting Willow Creek is just one. Other projects include cleaning out the culverts and adding another pump station to the treatment plant. • Fishing Pier. The fishing pier was opened again to the public last September, but there are some issues that need to be addressed. The contractor will be back on site starting June 15"' to repair some of the center joints. It will not be necessary to close the entire pier during the approximately 5-week construction period, but some areas will likely be closed as work is done under specific sections of the pier. The work will be done at no cost to the City since the project is still under warranty. • Public Restroom. A new downtown public restroom was opened in 2016, and informational panels were recently installed on the east wall of the new facility. The Economic Development Department and Cultural Services Division worked with the Edmonds Museum to create the historical panels, which were funded by the Hubbard Family Foundation. • Edmonds Marsh. The City will continue to work on daylighting Willow Creek, and the City will continue to contract with Keeley O'Connell to project manage the phases of the marsh rehabilitation efforts. • Critical Areas Report for Edmonds Parks. Recent changes in the Critical Areas Ordinance required the Parks Department to hire a consultant to prepare critical areas reports for all parks where maintenance and restoration activities are expected to be conducted within critical areas during the next five years. The reports will enable park maintenance staff and volunteer stewardship groups to lawfully continue removing invasive vegetation and restoring native vegetation within critical areas following approval by the Planning Division. • Parklet Development. The City has received requests from a number of private business owners in the downtown about the idea of constructing parklets. The City's plan is to construct a parklet on 4`' Avenue between Main Street and the ECA as a pilot project to gauge interest. Vice Chair Monroe noted that creating parklets could result in a loss of parking. He asked if there is a process whereby the City will solicit feedback from the community about whether or not this would be desirable. Ms. Hite said the first parklet would be constructed closer to the ECA where there is not as much demand for parking space. The goal is to see how much it is utilized before considering opportunities to expand to other locations. • Outdoor Fitness Zones. Money has been set aside in the Capital Improvement Program for the past two years to provide leverage or matching funds for grants to complete this project. The City's grant application has been put on hold based on a recent decision by Verdant Health to place a hold on all grants pending discussions with their auditors. The project is still in Verdant's queue, but it will not be done until grant funding has been received. • Meadowdale Playfields. The City is partnering with the City of Lynnwood and the Edmonds School District to renovate the Meadowdale Playfields in 2017. The intent is to replace the natural dirt and grass fields with synthetic fields so they can be played on year-round. The City Council approved an interlocal agreement with the school district and the City of Lynnwood, and the City of Lynnwood recently awarded the contract. The project should be on line by the end of the year. • City Storage Building. The previous building was destroyed by an arson fire, and the City is in the process of replacing it with a larger facility that will serve the needs of both the Parks Department and the Public Works Department. Progress towards completion of the new building should be made before the end of the year. • Community Garden. This project has been identified in the City's Capital Improvement Program for quite some time, but it has been difficult to find land. City staff is in discussions with Snohomish County about entering into an interlocal agreement to use a portion of Esperance Park for a Community Garden. Snohomish County recently completed a master plan for the park, which includes space for a community garden. Working together, they should be able to get the garden area ready for the 2018 growing season. Board Member Lovell asked how large the garden would be, and Ms. Hite answered that it would be about'/2 acre, divided into about 50 raised beds. Planning Board Minutes June 14, 2017 Page 4 Packet Pg. 6 2.A.a • Veteran's Plaza. There was a very successful ribbon -cutting event on Memorial Day, but there is a final punch list of items that still need to be completed. Waterfront Redevelopment and Walkway Completion. The City has been working parallel to the Senior Center's efforts to rebuild. The City's interest is to pull back the creosote pier from the Sound and introduce a filtration system from the parking lot to the Sound. In addition, the City is interested in completing the walkway south of the Senior Center. The City owns an easement in front of the Ebbtide Condominiums, and it is working with a designer to figure out the possibilities of connecting the walkway. The City has applied for grant funding, and there will also be some funding available from the Real Estate Excise Tax and Park Impact Fees. They are currently in the design phase, and also have a contractor working on the environmental permits that will be needed for the project. The goal is to break ground in 2018 and complete the overwater construction work during the fish window (mid -July through mid - September). • Frances Anderson Center Bandshell. The City received occupancy papers for the new facility today, and it will be used by the Arts Festival this weekend. They have received a number of positive comments about the bandshell, which fits Edmonds nicely. Informational Panels. A committee with representatives from the Arts Commission, Historic Preservation Commission, Development Services, and Parks Department have met to develop draft guidelines for informational panels located in City parks and rights -of -way to ensure a stylistic consistency and sensitivity to number and locations. The informational panels are intended to provide environmental, historical and cultural information associated with specific sites. Two informational panels are currently in development, one for Yost Park to identify an old -growth cedar stump showing notches from logging at the turn of the 20'h century and another for Sunset Avenue showing the waterfront sawmills in 1910. The Historic Preservation Commission developed the concept for the two panels and the design was reviewed by the Arts Commission. The City Council approved allocation of funds to create the two panels in December of 2016, but they required that the Planning Board review the design before final fabrication. Board Member Lovell noted that the proposal is to place an informational sign at the end of Bell Street on Sunset Avenue. He noted that, as currently proposed, a new crossing over the tracks is proposed at Edmonds Street. There have been suggestions that a minipark could be established in this location, as well. He said the Historic Preservation Commission should be made aware of this proposal so they can consider the option of moving the informational sign further north to a higher location at some point in the future. Ms. Hite said it was difficult to find an ideal location on City property that did not have trees that blocked the view. She agreed to invite the group to consider this alternative location, as well. Board Member Lovell inquired about the exact location of the informational sign at Yost Park. Ms. Hite answered that it would be located about 200 feet down a trail off of Main Street that starts near Olympic Avenue where an old -growth cedar stump is located. She noted that a lot of walkers use the trail, and the sign would be highly visible. The intent is to locate it near the stump. Board Member Lovell asked if any thought has been given to creating a map to illustrate the location of each of the informational signs, and Ms. Hite answered affirmatively. Board Member Robles said that these signs have been used in other cities, and they tend to fade and become weathered over time. He asked if there is sufficient funding to ensure that the signs are high quality. Ms. Hite answered that the signs would be constructed of a high -quality laminate material that is weather resistant. The same material has been used on other signs in the City over the past five years, and they are very happy with the durability of the product. Board Member Robles said he likes the concept of historical panels. However, he asked if the City has considered opportunities for historical panels that celebrate the indigenous community that used to live in Edmonds. Ms. Hite answered that the informational signs that were installed on the new restroom in the downtown tell the story of the indigenous people. Vice Chair Monroe asked if the City is planning to install more informational signs over time. Ms. Hite answered hat is possible as they work with the Historic Preservation Commission to identify stories and places. However, there is Planning Board Minutes June 14, 2017 Page 5 Packet Pg. 7 nothing planned right now. She cautioned that it is important to balance the number of signs in places where people want to enjoy the natural beauty. Vice Chair Monroe asked about the average cost of the signs, and Ms. Hite answered that they cost about $5,000. Board Member Cheung noted that the history contained on the two new signs is tied together. He suggested that references should be added to somehow tie the two signs together. Ms. Hite agreed that would be appropriate. BOARD MEMBER LOVELL MOVED THAT THE BOARD FORWARD A RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL THAT THEY ACCEPT AND APPROVE THE HISTORIC MARKER SIGNS AS PRESENTED BY STAFF WITH THE UNDERSTANDING THAT THEY BE AWARE THAT THE BELL STREET SIGN MAY NEED TO BE RELOCATED IF AND WHEN THE EDMONDS RAILRAOD CROSSING SOLUTION COMES TO FRUITION. VICE CHAIR MONROE SECONDED THE MOTION. BOARD MEMBER CHEUNG MOVED THAT THE MOTION BE AMENDED TO ADD THAT A REFERENCE BE PROVIDED ON EACH SIGN TO CONNECT THE TWO TOGETHER. BOARD MEMBER CLOUTIER SECONDED THE MOTION TO AMEND, WHICH CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. THE MAIN MOTION WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED AS AMENDED. Economic Impact of Arts and Cultural/Community Cultural Plan. The Arts Commission and staff are currently working to implement the strategy identified in the Community Cultural Plan involving a study of the economic impact of arts and culture in Edmonds. The study is funded through the Parks Department, Arts Commission and Economic Development Commission, and BERK was selected as the project consultant. The first meeting with the advisory group was held, and stakeholder interviews have been conducted. A survey of the attendees has been tested for use over the summer and early fall, and additional data will be collected from arts and culture nonprofits and businesses. Board Member Rosen asked about the Board's role in the economic impact study. Ms. Hite said the draft will likely come before the Board as the Parks Board before moving on to the City Council. If the Board is interested, they could also be involved in the process via the on-line and in -person surveys that will be conducted over the next several months. Board Member Rosen said it would be helpful to see the methodology the consultant used to prepare the survey, and Ms. Hite agreed to send it to the Board Members. • Willow Creek Fish Hatchery. After nearly 30 years operating the hatchery, Trout Unlimited announced it would be retiring from operations within the next two years. Sound Salmon Solutions, a non-profit organization and regional leader in salmon conservation, has agreed to take over management of the hatchery operations and expand the educational programming and outreach activities at the site. A Professional Services Agreement was signed in February to cover staff time for training and grant writing, and Sound Salmon Solutions staff has been working closely with Trout Unlimited with the goal of fully taking over operations at the facility in 2018. Western Washington University Initiatives. This year the City has had the benefit of several projects from Western Washington University (WWU) students as part of the Sustainable Cities Partnership. Students from the parks and recreation program provided creative and innovate ideas for recreation programming in Edmonds, a marketing class provided proposals for the 4"h Avenue Cultural Corridor, an environmental class provided a Phase 1 environmental assessment of Stella's Landing, and a GIS and marketing class worked on mapping the cemetery. Once the cemetery project is completed, people will be able to find information about where loved ones are buried on line and even view a photo of the actual gravesite. There will also be a map available at the cemetery for those who are not comfortable searching on line. • Urban Forest Management Plan. The Parks Department is working with the Development Services Department to complete an Urban Forest Management Plan in 2017, and they have retained the services of Davey Resources Group to engage with the community to draft the plan. The first public open house is scheduled for June 22nd in the Brackett Room of City Hall from 6:30 to 8:00 p.m. The intent is to create some goals, going forward, for management of the public forests. Board Member Lovell urged Board Members to attend the open house. He recalled that, two years ago, the Tree Board presented a plan to the Planning Board that nearly caused a riot at the public hearing. He expects there Planning Board Minutes June 14, 2017 Page 6 Packet Pg. 8 2.A.a will be a lot of public participation as the plan moves forward, and it would behoove the Planning Board Members to follow the process closely. • Staffing Changes. After 30 years of service, Renee McRae has retired, and Dave Johnston has been hired as the new Deputy Director. He comes from the City of Tukwila where he serves as the Parks and Recreation Supervisor. Board Member Lovell reminded the Board that one of its members typically participates as a judge in the Sand Sculpture Contest that is held in July. He said he has fulfilled this assignment in past years and it has been a lot of fun. Board Member Robles said he was a judge in 2016, and he found it to be fascinating. Board Member Rosen commented that the presentation provided by Ms. Hite, as well as the written report that was included in the Staff Report, makes him even more proud to be a member of the Edmonds community. Parks not only enhance the quality of life for Edmonds citizens, they also provide an economic value to the City. Ms. Hite said she has an incredible staff team, which means that she does not have to be the lead on all projects. She said she loves her job, and feels that Edmonds is an amazing town that supports parks. Board Member Lovell commented that, looking to the future, the City may be reaching the point where it may need to consider opportunities for obtaining additional funding for parks, and the concept of creating a Metropolitan Park District may come up again. Ms. Hite reviewed that Board Member Lovell participated on the committee that researched the concept a few years ago, and there was a lot of support for the approach. However, at the time, the financial forecast improved and the City Council made the decision not to float it as an initiative. As the City looks forward, the financial picture is tight and it may be appropriate to consider the option once again if there is community support for projects such as daylighting Willow Creek and implementing the Marina Beach and Civic Field Master Plans. She said she has discussed the concept with Mayor Earling and also submitted an article in THE EDMONDS BEACON regarding options for financing projects. Forming a Metropolitan Park District is one option the legislature has given to cities in the state, and quite a few have taken advantage of the opportunity. Board Member Lovell asked if the impetus to reconsider the option would come from the Mayor or the City Council. Ms. Hite advised that if the City Council is interested in pursuing the option again, Mayor Earling could direct her work to do that. It would likely be part of the financial discussion that takes place during the budget process. REVIEW OF EXTENDED AGENDA The Board reviewed that the agenda for the June 28th meeting includes a review of the proposed Planned Action Ordinance for the Highway 99 Subarea Plan, as well as a presentation on the 2017 Water Comprehensive Plan update. The July 12th agenda includes a public hearing on the Proposed Planned Action Ordinance for the Highway 99 Subarea Plan, and a public hearing on the 2017 Update to the Water Comprehensive Plan. Vice Chair Monroe asked that the extended agenda be updated to include an update on the Economic Impacts of Arts and Culture Study, as well as an update on the Urban Forest Management Plan. PLANNING BOARD CHAIR COMMENTS Vice Chair Monroe reported on his attendance at the May 17th Economic Development Commission Meeting where they came up with a number of topics to focus on over the next six to eight months. He also reported that he met with Mayor Earling to discuss the Board's report to the City Council on June 20th. He advised that he and Chair Rubenkonig would work together to prepare the report. PLANNING BOARD MEMBER COMMENTS Board Member Rosen said he was happy to be a member of the Board and will work hard to learn so that he can add value to the Board as quickly as possible. Board Member Lovell welcomed him on the Board and said he looks forward to his participation and valuable input. ADJOURNMENT Planning Board Minutes June 14, 2017 Page 7 Packet Pg. 9 2.A.a The Board meeting was adjourned at 8:15 p.m. El a+ Q Planning Board Minutes June 14, 2017 Page 8 Packet Pg. 10 5.A Planning Board Agenda Item Meeting Date: 06/28/2017 Development Services Director Report Staff Lead: Shane Hope, Director Department: Planning Division Prepared By: Diane Cunningham Background/History N/A Staff Recommendation Review and discuss Narrative Report is attached Attachments: Director. Report.06.23.17 Packet Pg. 11 5.A.a Date: June 23, 2017 To From Subject: 1,711 W71•A_ 0 allll Planning Board Shane Hope, Development Services Director Director Report "Patriotism is always more than just loyalty to a place on a map or a certain kind of people. Instead, it is also loyalty to America's ideals." -President Barack Obama Happy fun & safe 4th of July to you & your family from the City of Edmonds Next Planning Board Meeting The next Planning Board meeting is on June 28, with agenda items that include: (1) an introduction to the draft Highway 99 Area planned action ordinance; and (2) an overview of the proposed new Water Comprehensive Plan. REGIONAL NEWS Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC) ❑ The PSRC Executive Board is amending the region's Transportation Improvement Program to include two key transportation projects in Snohomish County: (a) new bus rapid transit line ("Swift Green Line") between Canyon Park and Paine Field and (b) peak -use shoulder lane on 1-5 between Everett and Marysville. ❑ PSRC's Regional Staff Committee (which includes the Edmonds Development Services Director) met June 15 on items including: o Transportation 2040 Update o Regional Centers Framework Update o Updates from Other Jurisdictions (which included an Edmonds update on the Highway 99 Subarea planning project) Snohomish County Tomorrow (SCT) The SCT Steering Committee (which primarily consists of local elected officials, including Councilmember Tibbott) meets June 28 on items including: 1 1 P a g e Packet Pg. 12 5.A.a o Economic Alliance Snohomish County update o SCT Five -Year Strategic Plan 0 2018 dues assessment. Sound Transit The Sound Transit Board met June 22 and considered items including: o Update on Northgate Link Extension o Guidelines for partnering agreements with cities involved in the Lynnwood Link Extension project o Updates and agreements on components of various projects Community Transit Community Transit is completing its annual update to the six -year Transit Development Plan. The plan calls for increasing transit service in parts of Snohomish County and beyond to Seattle and the UW. For more information, see: https://www.communitVtransit.org/tdp. Public comment on the plan update will be taken through July 7. The webpage explains how to provide comments. LOCAL NEWS Fourth of July Parade 4t" of July events in Edmonds promise to be fun and interesting, as always! One big event is the parade [Attendees are reminded to not save "viewing spaces" in the public right of way prior to the day of the parade. This helps keep the event open and safe for all.] Highway 99 Area Planning Project The City Council recently reviewed the City Council held a public hearing on June 20 on the Planning Board's recommendations for code changes to implement the proposed Highway 99 Subarea Plan. In addition, a draft Environmental Impact Statement for the plan was issued June 2. (See: http://www.edmondshwy99.org/planned-action-eis/.) An open house about the draft EIS was also held June 20 from 6:00 to 7:00 pm at City Hall. Adoption of the final plan and code is anticipated for August. Urban Forest Management Plan Development of an Urban Forest Management Plan is moving forward. On June 22, a public open house provided for information and input on managing the City's trees. The open house took place in the Brackett Room at City Hall. It followed up on the City's first public meeting on this topic, which was a presentation and discussion with the Tree Board. Now a City webpage includes information about the Urban Forest Management Plan project. (See: http://www.edmondswa.gov/2011-07-27-22-31-43/planning-long-range.html.) It also has a link to a community survey. The webpage will be updated periodically. 2 1 P a g e Packet Pg. 13 5.A.a Marsh Study A Request for Proposals (RFP) has been issued for the Edmonds Marsh Study. The study is intended as a site -specific, planning -level scientific baseline study. Responses are due August 15. Development Permits May 2017 was a record month for issued building permits in Edmonds: 172 to be exact! Several larger projects, including the new Madrona School building, are continuing forward in the permitting and construction process. Architectural Design Board The Architectural Design Board held two public hearings and approved two projects on June 21St. The first public hearing was a continuation of a Phase 1 for the Graphite Art Studios at 202 Main Street. The Graphite building will replace the structures at the Marvel Marble site. Graphite will be a new two story building over a one level underground garage. The ground floor will include an art institute with space for artists to create art and a gallery for their art to be displayed. There will also be a cafe with indoor and outdoor seating. The second level will include more artist spaces and three 2 bedroom apartments. The second public hearing was for 11 new two-story detached single-family homes on a multi -family zoned property at 8609/8611/8615-244t" Street SW. There next meeting will be held on July 5. An agenda will be posted online when available. Diversity Commission The Diversity Commission next meeting will be held July 5. An agenda will be posted online when available. Economic Development Commission The Economic Development Commission held a meeting on June 21 which included a presentation on housing issues. There next meeting will be held on July 19. An agenda will be posted online when available. Historic Preservation The Historic Preservation Commission's next meeting will be July 13. Items of discussion will include: 2018 historic calendar, possible certificate of appropriateness for museum & reviewing a structure for Edmonds Historic Register. An agenda will be posted online when available. Mayor's Climate Protection Committee The Committee's next meeting is July 6. To learn more about the Committee, see: http://www.edmondswa.gov/climate-protection-committee.html. Tree Board The Tree Board meets next on July 6. An agenda will be posted online when available. 3 1 P a g e Packet Pg. 14 5.A.a City Council Topics for the Council's June 20 meeting included: ❑ Approval for: o Approval of 2018-2023 TIP o Authorization for supplemental agreement for Fishing Pier Rehab project o Traffic impact fee annual report ❑ Presentation from Planning Board with questions & comments from Council members (Nice job, Carreen and Nathan!) ❑ Public hearing on Hwy 99 Area- CG Rezone (Map) & Development Regulations (to be the subject of further discussion on July 18) ❑ Proposed Noise Ordinance (with direction from Council to make certain modifications) ❑ Council committee structure & procedures (with approval of ordinance No. 4073) Topics for the Council's June 27 meeting include: ❑ Resolution regarding Environmental Goals established in the Paris Accord ❑ Committee meetings for: o Parks, Planning & Public Works on public works projects, noise control, and the multifamily tax exemption program o Finance on the multifamily tax exemption program o Public Safety and Personnel on any issues, as necessary COMMUNITY CALENDAR • June 17 —Oct. 7: Summer Market • July 4: Edmonds 4t" of July Parade • July 4: Beat Brackett 5K & Baby Brackett 1K • July 16: Edmonds in Bloom Garden Tour • July 20: Walk Back In Time & Open House, Edmonds Memorial Cemetery & Columbarium, 1 pm • July 25: Sand Sculpting Contest, Marina Beach Park, 10 am 41Pane Packet Pg. 15 8.A Planning Board Agenda Item Meeting Date: 06/28/2017 Presentation of 2017 Comprehensive Water System Plan Staff Lead: Michele (Mike) De Lilla, P.E., LEED AP Department: Development Services Prepared By: Diane Cunningham Background/History The Water Comprehensive Plan was last updated in 2010. Staff Recommendation Approve for public hearing on July 12. Narrative The water system plan is an update to the City of Edmonds' (City's) December 2010 Water Comprehensive Plan, which received Washington State Department of Health (DOH) approval in February 2011. The City is required to update and submit a water system plan to DOH for review and approval every ten years in accordance with current drinking water regulations. Prior to January 2017, the plan update and approval period was six years. The purpose of this updated plan is to meet the State's regulatory requirements and to provide the City with a useful working document to guide the planning, scheduling, and budgeting of water system improvements. This updated plan will also be used by City staff to help maintain the water system to ensure both existing and future customers are provided with a safe and reliable supply of drinking water and fire protection. The planning period for this water system plan is 20 years. Water System Overview The City's municipal water system started in 1928 and has grown over the years as the City expanded and annexed more areas. The City's water system provides service to approximately 80 percent of the population within the City limits of roughly 10,177 metered water service connections. The other 20 percent of the City's population receive water service from the Olympic View Water & Sewer District, which is located within the southwest portion of the City limits. All water supplied to City customers is currently purchased from Alderwood Water and Wastewater District (AWWD) and is conveyed through a single metered connection near the northeast corner of the water system. The City also has the capability to serve a portion of its system with water purchased from Seattle Public Utilities (SPU), but currently maintains this source of supply and the single metered connection on standby. Water purchased from AWWD originates from the City of Everett Sultan River source. Water supplied by SPU originates from SPUs Tolt River source. The City's water system has seven pressure zones with two supply stations, 17 pressure reducing valve (PRV) stations, two pressure relief stations, one pump station, more than 139 miles of water main, and Packet Pg. 16 8.A 11 emergency interties with adjacent water systems. Water storage is provided by four reservoirs that have a combined capacity of 7.5 million gallons (MG). Water System Analysis and Planned Improvements The existing water system was analyzed to determine its ability to meet current water system regulations and the City's own policies and design criteria. Several analyses were performed to evaluate all components of the water system under both existing and future water demand conditions. The results of the analyses were used to identify and size improvements for the water system. Staff will use this ranking in the future years to identify which improvements will be made each year to provide the City with the flexibility to coordinate water main projects with street or other utility projects that may be planned for the same area. There may also be times when the priority ranking for a replacement may change due to subsequent main breaks, increased demands due to developments happening earlier than anticipated or other circumstances that require replacement sooner than planned. Financing for Planned Water System Improvements The need for improvements to the water system is almost entirely due to aging infrastructure that has reached the end of its useful service life, is undersized and unable to meet current requirements, or has some other existing system deficiency. The improvements identified in this plan have been sized to meet both current needs and future growth within the system. Improvements identified for the next six years (2017-2022) are estimated to cost approximately $18.9 million, which results in an average expenditure of approximately $3.15 million per year (in 2016 dollars). A financing plan has been developed for funding the planned improvements and ongoing operations and maintenance, while paying down debt. The financing plan is based on the City's preference to fund capital improvements from cash reserves without incurring new debt. The improvements will be funded through a combination of cash reserves from system reinvestment, rate revenues, and new water service connection general facility charges. Ongoing water rate adjustments are necessary to provide sufficient revenue to support water system operations, maintenance and replacements. The financing plan is based on the City's recently adopted water rate adjustments for 2017 through 2019 and projected adjustments for future years. Attachments: Edmonds Water System Plan June 2017 Agency Review Packet Pg. 17 - I fi 1t I R AdMI r Comprehensive Water System Plan Agency Review June 2017 8.A.a Q Packet Pg. 19 8.A.a COMPREHENSIVE WATER SYSTEM PLAN FOR CITY OF EDMONDS AGENCY REVIEW June 2017 Prepared by: MURRAYSMITH, INC. In association with: FCS Group, Inc. 15-1662.405 1Packet Pg. 20 8.A.a Q Packet Pg. 21 8.A.a City of Edmonds Comprehensive Water System Plan Table of Contents Chapters Page ExecutiveSummary...................................................................................................................ES-1 Chapter1 Introduction................................................................................................................ 1-1 Chapter 2 Water System Description......................................................................................... 2-1 Chapter 3 Land Use and Population........................................................................................... 3-1 Chapter4 Water Demands.......................................................................................................... 4-1 Chapter 5 Policies and Design Criteria....................................................................................... 5-1 Chapter 6 Water Source and Quality.......................................................................................... 6-1 Chapter 7 Operations and Maintenance...................................................................................... 7-1 Chapter 8 Water System Analyses.............................................................................................. 8-1 Chapter 9 Water System Improvements ..................................................................................... 9-1 Chapter10 Financial Plan.......................................................................................................... 10-1 Tables Page Table 1-1 Water System Ownership and Management.............................................................. 1-1 Table 2-1 Water Main Summary by Diameter........................................................................... 2-9 Table 2-2 Water Main Summary by Material............................................................................ 2-9 Table 3-1 Historical Population and Future Projections............................................................ 3-4 Table 4-1 Average Annual Metered Consumption and Service Connections ............................ 4-2 Table 4-2 2014 Largest Water Users.......................................................................................... 4-3 Table 4-3 Historical Supply and Per Capita Demands............................................................... 4-4 Table 4-4 2014 Demands by Pressure Zone............................................................................... 4-5 Table 4-5 Metered Supply and Consumption Comparison........................................................ 4-6 Table 4-6 2014 Estimated Distribution System Leakage........................................................... 4-6 Table 4-7 Equivalent Residential Units (ERUs)........................................................................ 4-7 Table 4-8 Peak Day Demands and Peaking Factors................................................................... 4-9 Table 4-9 General Fire Flow Requirements............................................................................. 4-10 Table 4-10 Future Water Demand Projections........................................................................... 4-11 Table 4-11 Future ERU Projections........................................................................................... 4-13 Table 7-1 Water System Operations and Maintenance Organization Chart .............................. 7-2 Table 7-2 Personnel Certification............................................................................................... 7-3 Table 7-3 Preventative Maintenance Schedule........................................................................ 7-10 Table 8-1 Water System Operations & Maintenance Organization Chart ................................. 8-1 Table 8-2 Personnel Certification............................................................................................... 8-3 Table 8-3 Five Corners Pump Station Capacity Evaluation....................................................... 8-4 Table 8-4 Existing Storage Capacity Evaluation........................................................................ 8-6 Table 8-5 Future Storage Capacity Evaluation........................................................................... 8-7 Table 8-6 Fire Flow Analysis Summary................................................................................... 8-11 Table 8-7 Existing (2014) System Capacity Analysis.............................................................. 8-13 i Packet Pg. 22 8.A.a Table 8-8 20-Year (2034) Projected System Capacity Analysis .............................................. 8-14 Table 9-1 Water System Improvements Completed Since 2009................................................ 9-2 Table 9-2 Water Main Unit Costs for Construction................................................................... 9-6 Table 9-3 Water Main Improvements Priority Ranking Criteria ............................................... 9-7 Table 9-4 Water Main Improvements Priority Ranking — Sorted by CIP Number .................... 9-8 Table 9-5 Water Main Improvements Priority Ranking — Sorted by Total Points ................... 9-11 Table 9-6 Water Main Improvement Projects.......................................................................... 9-15 Table 9-7 Planned Improvements Implementation Schedule ................................................... 9-20 Table 10-1 Historical Financial Performance 2010 — 2015....................................................... 10-2 Table 10-2 General Facility Charge Calculation........................................................................ 10-7 Table 10-3 Water Utility Capital Improvement Program......................................................... 10-10 Table 10-4 2016-2022 Annual Capital Fund Cash Flow.........................................................10-10 Table 10-5 Summary of Projected Financial Performance & Revenue Requirements ............ 10-12 Table 10-6 Water Rate Forecast............................................................................................... 10-13 Table 10-7 Affordability Test................................................................................................... 10-14 Figures Page Figure 2-1 Existing Water System............................................................................................. 2-14 Figure 2-2 Existing Water System Hydraulic Profile................................................................ 2-15 Figure 2-3 Service Area and Adjacent Water Systems.............................................................. 2-16 Figure 3-1 Comprehensive Plan Map.......................................................................................... 3-5 Figure 9-1 2010 - 2017 Water Main Improvements.................................................................. 9-21 Figure 9-2 Proposed Capital Improvements.............................................................................. 9-22 Appendices Appendix A Agreements Appendix B Water Facilities Inventory (WFI) Form Appendix C Water System Facility Data Appendix D Consistency Statement Checklist Appendix E SEPA Checklist Appendix F Water Use Efficiency Program Appendix G Water System Construction Standards Appendix H Cross Connection Control Program Appendix I Fire Code Appendix J Annual Water Quality Report Appendix K Coliform Monitoring Plan Appendix L Water Ordinances Appendix M Agency Review Comments ii Packet Pg. 23 8.A.a EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Overview and Purpose This water system plan is an update to the City of Edmonds' (City's) December 2010 Water Comprehensive Plan, which received Washington State Department of Health (DOH) approval in February 2011. The City is required to update and submit a water system plan to DOH for review and approval every ten years in accordance with current drinking water regulations. Prior to January 2017, the plan update and approval period was six years. The purpose of this updated plan is to meet the State's regulatory requirements and to provide the City with a useful working document to guide the planning, scheduling, and budgeting of water system improvements. This updated plan will also be used by City staff to help maintain the water system to ensure both existing and future customers are provided with a safe and reliable supply of drinking water and fire protection. The planning period for this water system plan is 20 years. Water System Overview The City's municipal water system started in 1928 and has grown over the years as the City expanded and annexed more areas. The City's water system provides service to approximately 80 percent of the population within the City limits of roughly 10,177 metered water service connections. The other 20 percent of the City's population receive water service from the Olympic View Water & Sewer District, which is located within the southwest portion of the City limits. All water supplied to City customers is currently purchased from Alderwood Water and Wastewater District (AWWD) and is conveyed through a single metered connection near the northeast corner of the water system. The City also has the capability to serve a portion of its system with water purchased from Seattle Public Utilities (SPU), but currently maintains this source of supply for emergencies only and the single metered connection on standby. Water purchased from AWWD originates from the City of Everett Sultan River source. Water supplied by SPU originates from SPUs Tolt River source. The City's water system has seven pressure zones with two supply stations, 17 pressure reducing valve (PRV) stations, two pressure relief stations, one pump station, more than 139 miles of water main, and 11 emergency interties with adjacent water systems. Water storage is provided by four reservoirs that have a combined capacity of 7.5 million gallons (MG). 15-1662 Page ES-1 1 Packet Pg. 24 8.A.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Water Supply and Water Quality The City's purchase of water from AWWD is on a wholesale basis and subject to the terms and conditions of the water supply agreement that has been in place since 1978. A new agreement was negotiated in 2010 extending the wholesale supply agreement through January 1, 2055. The City also negotiated a new agreement with SPU in 2011 for long-term standby supply for emergency purposes through December 31, 2061. The City signed an interlocal agreement with the City of Lynnwood in 2015 providing supplemental water supply for emergency purposes. The City's primary supply of water is produced at the source by the City of Everett (Everett), then supplied to AWWD, and finally supplied to the City. Everett is the regional supplier of water to a majority of water systems in Snohomish County. Everett's source of water originates from the Sultan River and fills Lake Chaplain, where it is drawn and treated at the Everett Water Filtration Plant. The water also receives chlorine disinfection within the AWWD system prior to being supplied to the City. Water quality is routinely monitored within the City's system and has been good in the past with no water quality concerns. Past Water Usage and Future Water Demands Total annual water usage within the City's service area peaked in 2003, at a time when the City was supplying an average of 3.65 million gallons per day (MGD). Since 2003, total annual water usage has decreased at the same time that the number of water customers has moderately increased. Total water supply to the system averaged 2.92 MGD in 2014. The average per capita water demand within the City's service area from 2009 through 2014 was 95 gallons per day per person. This represents a reduction of roughly 9 percent when compared to the average water demand of 104 gallons per day per person that was presented in the City's 2010 Comprehensive Water System Plan for the years 2003 through 2008. The reduction in water usage in terms of both total annual water supply and average day demand per person over the last several years is due to the success of the City's past conservation efforts, replacement of old water mains, and the detection and repair of water main leaks. Additional reductions in per capita water demand are expected in future years, but not likely at the same rate seen in recent years. Future reductions from water use are expected from ongoing replacements of old water main and the continued implementation of water use efficiency measures (previously referred to as conservation measures), both at the local and regional levels. Growth of customers within the City's existing service area will have the largest impact on overall water demand during the next 20 years. At the end of the 20-year planning period, the estimated amount of additional water demand from planned growth will represent an increase between approximately 5.5 and 14 percent, depending on the amount of future water use reductions from the continued water use efficiency program efforts. 15-1662 Page ES-2 J Packet Pg. 25 8.A.a of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water Svstem Plan EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Operations and Maintenance The City's Water Division is staffed by several well -qualified personnel that are certified to operate and maintain the water system, as required by law. The City provides ongoing training opportunities for staff to comply with the State's certification requirements and to develop the skills necessary to ensure a dependable supply of high -quality drinking water is available to customers at all times. The Water Division is currently staffed with seven full-time personnel consisting of four field technicians, one water quality technician, one meter reader, and one lead supervisor. The Water and Sewer Manager and Public Works Director both allocate a portion of their time to the Water Division as well. The Water Division has been able to operate the water system and meet past regulatory requirements for public water systems. However, the increasing needs of the water system, combined with the additional demands of now having a consistent waterline replacement program and additional needs due to regulatory requirements, has created more challenges in completing planned preventive maintenance activities. Therefore, the City's Water Maintenance and Operations Division is planning to add at least one additional staff member in the near future to ensure continued compliance with regulatory requirements and the increasing needs of the system. Water System Improvements Completed Since 2010 The City has completed several water system improvement projects since the last water system plan was completed in 2010. These include several projects that replaced old and undersized water main, improvements to the Five Corners Pump Station, and pressure reducing station replacements. Water System Analysis and Planned Improvements The existing water system was analyzed to determine its ability to meet current water system regulations and the City's own policies and design criteria. Several analyses were performed to evaluate all components of the water system under both existing and future water demand conditions. The results of the analyses were used to identify and size improvements for the water system. Planned improvements include the following, which are detailed in Chapter 9: Water Main Improvements o Primarily replacement of existing water mains due to their age, pipe material, and need to provide more fire flow. • PRV Station and Pressure Relief Improvements 15-1662 Page ES-3 JLFPacket Pg. 26 8.A.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan EXECUTIVE SUMMARY o Replacement of PRV Stations #13, #14, #15, #16 (CIP Nos. PRV 1 through PRV 4) o Annual PRV Station Improvements Program (CIP No. PRV 5) • Facility Improvements o Five Corners Reservoir Improvements (CIP No. F1) o Yost Reservoir Piping Maintenance and Replacement (CIP No. F2) o Seaview Reservoir Piping Maintenance and Replacement (CIP No. F3) o SPU Intertie & Emergency Intertie Improvements (CIP No. F4) • Other Improvements o Pressure Zone Conversion (325 to 486) (CIP No. Ml) o Comprehensive Water System Plan Update (CIP No. M2) Financing for Planned Water System Improvements The need for improvements to the water system is almost entirely due to aging infrastructure that has reached the end of its useful service life, is undersized and unable to meet current requirements, or has some other existing system deficiency. The improvements identified in this plan have been sized to meet both current needs and future growth within the system. Improvements identified for the next six years (2017-2022) are estimated to cost approximately $18.9 million, which results in an average expenditure of approximately $3.15 million per year (in 2016 dollars). A financing plan has been developed for funding the planned improvements and ongoing operations and maintenance, while paying down debt. The financing plan is based on the City's preference to fund capital improvements from cash reserves without incurring new debt. The improvements will be funded through a combination of cash reserves from system reinvestment, rate revenues, and new water service connection general facility charges. Ongoing water rate adjustments are necessary to provide sufficient revenue to support water system operations, maintenance and replacements. The financing plan is based on the City's recently adopted water rate adjustments for 2017 through 2019 and projected adjustments for future years. 15-1662 Page ES-4 JLFPacket Pg. 27 8.A.a CHAPTER 1 I INTRODUCTION Background and Purpose The City of Edmonds' (City) existing Comprehensive Water System Plan, dated December 2010, was approved by DOH in February 2011. This plan must be updated and submitted to the Washington State Department of Health (DOH) every ten years in accordance with the regulatory requirements contained in WAC 246-290-100. The purpose of this updated plan is to meet the current regulatory requirements for water system planning and provide useful planning information that will guide the City in operating, maintaining, and improving its water system. Water System Ownership and Management The City of Edmonds is a municipal corporation that owns and operates a public water system within its corporate boundaries. Water system data on file at the DOH for the City is shown in Table 1-1. Table 1-1 Water System Ownership and Management Information Type Description System Name City of Edmonds System Type Group A -Community -Public Water System County Snohomish County System ID Number 225004 Owner Number 1683 Address 7110 210th Street SW, Edmonds, WA 98026-7219 Primary Contact 425-771-0235 Owner Contact Jim Waite, Water/Sewer Manager Overview of Existing Water System The City's municipal water system started in 1928 with the construction of new water facilities and the acquisition of a private water company that was serving central Edmonds for many years. The City's water service area has grown over the years as the City expanded and annexed more areas. In 2014, the City provided water service to more than 10,177 customer accounts within an area of approximately 7.1 square miles. All water supplied by the City is purchased from Alderwood Water and Wastewater District 15-1662 Page 1-1 June 2017 Packet Pg. 28 8.A.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 11 INTRODUCTION (AWWD) and is conveyed through a single metered connection near the northeast corner of the City's system. The City also has the capability to serve a portion of its system with water purchased from Seattle Public Utilities (SPU) and conveyed through a single metered connection near the southeast corner of the City's system, but currently maintains this supply facility on standby. Water purchased from AWWD originates from the City of Everett Sultan River source and is sold to AWWD on a wholesale basis. Water supplied by SPU originates from SPUs Tolt River source. The City's water system has seven pressure zones with two supply stations, 17 pressure reducing stations, two pressure relief stations, one pump station, more than 139 miles of water main, and 11 emergency interties with adjacent water systems. Water storage is provided by four reservoirs that have a combined capacity of approximately 7.5 million gallons (MG). Summary of Plan Contents A summary of the plan and organization of content is provided below: • Executive Summary: Summarizes the key elements of this plan. • Chapter 1 - Introduction: Provides an overview of the City's water system, the objectives of the plan, and the plan organization. • Chapter 2 - Water System Description: Presents the water service area, describes the existing water system, and identifies the adjacent water purveyors. • Chapter 3 - Land Use and Population: Presents related plans, land use, and population characteristics. • Chapter 4 - Water Demands: Presents historical water use patterns, existing water demands, and projected future demands. • Chapter 5 - Policies and Design Criteria: Presents the City's water service policies, water system operation policies, and water system design criteria. • Chapter 6 - Water Source and Quality: Describes the City's water source and the results of past water quality monitoring. • Chapter 7 - Operations and Maintenance: Describes the City's water system operations and maintenance program. • Chapter 8 - Water System Analyses: Presents the results of the water system analyses and summarizes existing system deficiencies. 15-1662 Page 1-2 JLFPacket Pg. 29 8.A.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 11 INTRODUCTION • Chapter 9 - Water System Improvements: Describes the water system improvements that resolve existing system deficiencies, estimated costs of improvements, and a schedule for implementation of the improvements. • Chapter 10 - Financial Plan: Summarizes the financial status of the City's water utility and presents a program for funding the water system improvements. • Appendices: Additional information and plans that supplement the chapters listed above. o Appendix A - Agreements o Appendix B - DOH Water Facilities Inventory (WFI) Form o Appendix C - Water System Facility Data o Appendix D - Consistency Statement Checklist o Appendix E - State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Checklist o Appendix F - Water Use Efficiency Program o Appendix G - Construction Standards o Appendix H - Cross -Connection Control (CCC) Program o Appendix I - Fire Code o Appendix J - Annual Water Quality Report o Appendix K - Coliform Monitoring Plan o Appendix L — Ordinances Definition of Terms Definitions for terms used in this plan are provided below. Consumption: The volume of water used by the water system's customers, based on customer meter records. The volume is measured at each customer's connection to the distribution system. Cross -Connection: A physical arrangement that connects a drinking water system with anything other than another drinking water system with the potential for a contamination of the drinking water. Demand: The quantity of water required from a water supply source over a period of time necessary to meet the needs of domestic, commercial, industrial, and public uses, and to provide enough water to supply fire fighting, system losses, and miscellaneous water uses. Demands are normally discussed in terms of flow rate, such as million gallons per day (mgd) or gallons per minute (gpm), and are described in terms of a volume of water delivered during a certain time period. Types of demands discussed in this plan include: • Average Day Demand (ADD): The total amount of water delivered to the system in a year divided by the number of days in the year. 15-1662 Page 1-3 JLFPacket Pg. 30 8.A.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 11 INTRODUCTION • Peak Day Demand (PDD). The maximum amount of water delivered to the system during a 24-hour time period of a given year. • Peak Hour Demand (PHD): The maximum amount of water delivered to the system, excluding fire flow, during a one hour time period of a given year. Peak hour demand usually occurs during the same day as the peak day demand. Distribution System Leakage (DSL). The annual amount of water calculated from the difference between the measured amount of water supplied into the system and the measured amount of water taken out of the system for consumption and other authorized uses. Authorized uses include both metered and unmetered water uses. Water use that is unmetered must be estimated to be classified as an authorized use. Examples of common unmetered water uses include the use of hydrants for flushing, fire fighting, and construction. The calculated DSL volume consists primarily of water loss through leaks in the water system, but may also include meter inaccuracies, meter reading errors, water theft, and reservoir overflows. Equivalent Residential Units (ERU's): One ERU represents the amount of water used by one single family residence for a specific water system. The demand of other customer classes can be expressed in terms of ERU's by dividing the demand of each of the other customer classes by the demand represented by one ERU. Fire Flow: The rate of flow of water required during fire fighting, which is usually expressed in terms of gallons per minute (gpm). Head: A measure of pressure or force by water. Head is measured in feet and can be converted to pounds per square inch (psi) by dividing feet by 2.31. Head Loss or Pressure Loss: A reduction in pressure caused by pipeline wall friction, bends, physical restrictions, or obstructions as water moves through a pipeline. Hydraulic Elevation: The height of a free water surface above a defined datum; the height above the ground to which water in a pressure pipeline would rise in a vertical open-end pipe. Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL: The maximum permissible level of contaminant in the water that the purveyor delivers to any public water system user, measured at the locations identified under WAC 246-290-310. Potable: Water suitable for human consumption. Pressure Zone: A portion of a water system that operates at a common hydraulic elevation Purvey An agency, subdivision of the State, municipal corporation, firm, company, mutual or cooperative association, institution, partnership, persons, or other entity owning or 15-1662 Page 1-4 JLFPacket Pg. 31 8.A.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 11 INTRODUCTION operating a public water system. Purveyor also means the authorized agents of such entities. Supply: Water that is delivered to a water system by one or more supply facilities, which may consist of supply stations, booster pump stations, and wells. Storage: Water that is "stored" in a reservoir to supplement the supply facilities of a system and provide water supply for emergency conditions. Storage is broken down into the following five components that are defined and discussed in more detail in the plan: operational storage, equalizing storage, standby storage, fire flow storage, and dead storage. Water Service Connection Fee: A one-time fee paid by a property owner when initially connecting to the City's water system. This fee pays for the new customer's equitable share of the cost of the existing system. This fee offsets the costs of providing water to new customers and recognizes that the existing water system was largely built and paid for by the existing customers. Abbreviations The following abbreviations are used in this plan: ADD: Average Day Demand AWWA: American Water Works Association AWWD: Alderwood Water and Wastewater District CCR: Consumer Confidence Report CIP: Capital Improvement Program City: City of Edmonds DOH: Department of Health DSL: Distribution System Leakage EPA: Environmental Protection Agency ERU: Equivalent Residential Unit fps: feet per second GMA: Growth Management Act gpm: gallons per minute MCL: Maximum Contaminant Level MG: Million Gallons MGD: Million Gallons per Day mg/l: milligrams per liter PDD: Peak Day Demand PHD: Peak Hour Demand psi: pounds per square inch SDWA: Safe Drinking Water Act SPU: Seattle Public Utilities WAC: Washington Administrative Code 15-1662 Page 1-5 JLFPacket Pg. 32 8.A.a Q Packet Pg. 33 8.A.a CHAPTER 2 1 WATER SYSTEM DESCRIPTION Introduction This chapter describes the City of Edmonds' (City) existing water system and provides a brief discussion of adjacent water systems. Included is a discussion of the water service area, water service agreements, and all existing water system facilities. The evaluation of the existing water system is presented in Chapter 8. Water Service Area City History The City was incorporated in 1890 with the original town site encompassing approximately 550 acres. The original town site is now occupied primarily by the downtown and adjacent residential areas. The City has expanded in area through annexations to approximately 8.9 square miles. Continued growth during the 1940's and 50's resulted in a more active role of the municipality in providing water, sewer and streets for the residential and commercial expansion. The Port District was formed in 1948 and began waterfront improvements. Commercial and retail businesses within the downtown area provided a wide range of services to the community. Completion of Interstate 5 and increased growth in the Puget Sound region led to a gradual change in the character of Edmonds, with more emphasis on residential development and a decline in the retail importance of the downtown. The City is now primarily a residential community. The rate of population growth has been relatively stable over the years with a major increase between 1950 and 1970 from 8,016 to 23,700 due to annexations. Between 1990 and 2000, the population expanded to 39,515 due to annexations in the southern portion of the City. Since then, the City's population has grown to approximately 39,950 in 2014. Approximately 80 percent of the City's population receives water service from the City. The remaining 20 percent receive water service from the Olympic View Water & Sewer District (OVWSD), which is located within the southwest portion of the City limits. Water System History The original water system was established by the Edmonds Water Company in the late 1890's. Water was supplied from local springs and wells. The Edmonds Spring Water Company acquired the Edmonds Water Company shortly thereafter. The first large reservoir, a 300,000 gallon concrete tank, was constructed in 1921 near Ninth Avenue and Main Street. The City began acquiring and building its own municipal water system in 1928, beginning with a 500,000 gallon steel water tank and two wells. The City struggled with 15-1662 Page 2-1 J Packet Pg. 34 8.A.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 2 1 WATER SYSTEM DESCRIPTION water shortages and poor water quality from their groundwater sources through the 1950's and 60's. In 1966, the City contracted with the City of Seattle for a new water supply. A transmission main was extended from a new supply meter at the King County — Snohomish County boundary line through the Ballinger area, north of the City storage tank near Five Corners. The City also signed a water supply agreement with Alderwood Water & Wastewater District (AWWD) in 1966 to supply water to the City through a metered connection at the intersection of 168' Street SW and 62nd Avenue West. The City abandoned the wells and springs after completion of the new supply sources. Since 2000, the City has supplied the entire water system exclusively with water from AWWD, while maintaining the Seattle metered supply connection as a standby source of water for emergency use only. Topography The City's water service area is located in a relatively hilly portion of southwest Snohomish County. The highest elevation in the City is in the southeast corner at over 450 feet above Mean Sea Level (MSL). The topography of the City's service area generally slopes downward, from east to west, toward Puget Sound, with the exception of the southeast corner of the service area that slopes down towards Lake Ballinger. Retail Water Service Area The City's retail water service area boundary is within the City limits and defined by the City limits, except for the southwest portion of the City that is served by OVWSD, as shown in Figure 2-1, Existing Water System. These limits are generally defined as the area extending north to Meadowdale Beach Park, south to 244t' Street SW along the Snohomish/King County boundary, and west to the Puget Sound. The eastern boundary of the City limits generally follows Olympic View Drive, 76t' Ave West, and Highway 99, except for a small portion of the City bounded on the west by Highway 99 and Lake Ballinger to the east between 220t' Street SW and 244t'' Street SW. Satellite System Management A Satellite Management Agency (SMA) is defined as a person or entity that is certified by the Department of Health to own and/or operate more than one public water system without the necessity for a physical connection between such systems. The City provides water service to all customers in its water service area. Currently, no small water systems exist within the City's water service area. The areas adjacent to the City's water service area boundary are currently served by relatively large, public water systems that are unlikely to become future satellite water systems. 15-1662 Page 2-2 JLFPacket Pg. 35 8.A.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 2 1 WATER SYSTEM DESCRIPTION Water Service Agreements The City has entered into a long-term agreement with the AWWD for the purchase of water on a wholesale basis. The City also has an agreement with OVWSD for OVWSD's supply of water to customers within the City limits. The City has emergency intertie agreements with Seattle Public Utilities and the City of Lynwood for the supply of water during emergency events. A summary of these agreements is presented below and copies are contained in Appendix A. Water Supply Agreement with Alderwood Water & Wastewater District This 2010 agreement provides for the wholesale supply of water from AWWD to the City of Edmonds until January 1, 2055, at which time it can be renewed by mutual agreement of both parties. The agreement consists of several sections that address water supply, master metering, area of use, water quality, wholesale rate calculation, future facility acquisitions, and several other elements. A copy of the agreement is contained in Appendix A. Emergency Intertie Agreement with Seattle Public Utilities The December 31, 2011 agreement between the Seattle Public Utilities (SPU) and the City of Edmonds allows the City to use water through the metered connection to the SPU transmission system for emergency purposes, including fire flow. The agreement is for a fifty-year term, expiring on December 31, 2061. A copy of the agreement is in Appendix A. Interlocal Agreement with City of Lynnwood for Emergency Interties The March 2015 agreement provides for supplemental water supply for emergency purposes through five emergency intertie connections between the two water systems. The agreement addresses obligations, billing for water used, ownership, administration, and other elements. It also provides the locations of interties along with infrastructure information. 1985 Agreement with Olympic View Water District This agreement provides for water supply from the OVWSD to customers located within the Edmonds' city limits and the boundaries of OVWSD, subject to the terms and conditions as outlined in the agreement. A copy of this agreement is contained in Appendix A. Also included in Appendix A is a copy of the OVWSD franchise agreement and an interlocal operating agreement between the City and OVWSD. 15-1662 Page 2-3 J Packet Pg. 36 8.A.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 2 1 WATER SYSTEM DESCRIPTION Existing Water System Facilities A description of the City's existing water system facilities is provided in this section. The analysis of these facilities is presented in Chapter 8. General water system facility data is summarized on the Department of Health Water Facilities Inventory (WFI) form, which is included in Appendix B. More detailed water system facility information is contained in Appendix C. Pressure Zones The City's topography varies from sea level along the west side bordering the Puget Sound, to approximately 455 feet along the eastern City limit. The terrain generally slopes from east to west, toward Puget Sound. This wide range of elevation requires the City to either reduce or increase pressures in certain areas such that sufficient water pressure and fire now are available throughout the system. This has been accomplished by dividing the water system into seven different pressure zones, as shown in Figure 2-1. The pressure in each zone is regulated by reservoir levels, pressure reducing station settings, pump station settings, or a combination of these, as illustrated in the hydraulic profile, Figure 2-2. Overview All water supply to the system is from the Alderwood Supply Station, which supplies water directly to the City's highest pressure zone, the 596 Zone. All other pressure zones receive water from the 596 Zone through a control valve at the Five Corners Reservoir site or through pressure reducing valve (PRV) stations. A more detailed description of the City's pressure zones follows. 596 Zone The 596 Zone is the City's largest zone, which includes customers in the central and eastern portion of the City. The 596 Zone is a closed zone, which is a pressure zone without gravity storage. Primary supply to the zone is from the Alderwood Supply Station, which functions as a pressure regulating facility to maintain pressures in the 596 Zone. Pumped water storage is provided for the 596 Zone, utilizing the Five Corners 3.0 MG and 1.5 MG Reservoirs and the Five Corners Pump Station. The 596 Zone can also receive water on an emergency basis from five manually operated emergency interties with the City of Lynnwood, which are located along the eastern boundary of the service area. Ground elevations vary throughout the 596 Zone from approximately 270 to 455 feet. 505 Zone The 505 Zone supplies water to customers in the central and northern portion of the City. Water to this zone is supplied from the 596 Zone through five PRV stations, including PRV 15-1662 Page 2-4 JLFPacket Pg. 37 8.A.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 2 1 WATER SYSTEM DESCRIPTION Stations 10, 13, 14, 15, and 24. These stations reduce the pressure of the water to maintain adequate pressures throughout the 505 Zone. Ground elevations vary throughout the 505 Zone from approximately 195 to 365 feet. 0014re,- The 500 Zone supplies water to customers near the northern portion of the City. Water to this zone is supplied from the 596 Zone through two PRV stations (2 and 5). Ground elevations vary throughout the 500 Zone from approximately 180 to 400 feet. 486 Zone The 486 Zone supplies water to customers in the central and southern portion of the City. The primary supply of water to this zone is from the Five Corners 1.5 MG Reservoir, which floats on the zone and establishes pressures throughout the zone. The Five Corners 1.5 MG Reservoir is filled with water from the 596 Zone through a control valve on the inlet piping system of the reservoir. Supplemental water supply to the 486 Zone is provided by two PRV stations, which receive water from the 596 Zone. These PRV stations, 16 and 17, are normally not open and are set to supply water during fire now events and other high demand situations when pressures drop in the 486 Zone. The 486 Zone can also receive water on an emergency basis through three manually operated emergency interties with OVWSD. Ground elevations vary throughout the 486 Zone from approximately 170 to 375 feet. 425 Zone The 425 Zone is the smallest zone with customers near the north portion of the City. Water to this zone is supplied from the 596 Zone through two PRV stations. These PRV Stations include 8 and 9. Ground elevations vary throughout the 425 Zone from approximately 175 to 285 feet. 420 Zone The 420 Zone supplies water to customers in the central portion of the City. Water to this zone is supplied from two PRV stations, one receiving water from the 596 Zone (PRV Station 23) and the other receiving water from the 486 Zone (PRV Station 18). Ground elevations vary throughout the 420 Zone from approximately 155 to 250 feet. 325 Zone The 325 Zone is the second largest pressure zone and supplies water to customers in the western portion of the City and adjacent to Puget Sound. The primary supply of water to this zone is from the 1.5 MG Seaview Reservoir and 1.5 MG Yost Reservoir. Both reservoirs float on the zone and establish pressures throughout the zone. The Seaview Reservoir is 15-1662 Page 2-5 JLFPacket Pg. 38 8.A.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 2 1 WATER SYSTEM DESCRIPTION supplied with water from the 505 Zone through a control valve at the reservoir site. The Yost Reservoir is supplied with water from the Five Corners 1.5 MG Reservoir in the 486 Zone through a control valve at the reservoir site. Supplemental water supply to the 325 Zone is provided by four PRV stations, which are supplied by three different pressure zones, including two from the 500 Pressure Zone (PRV Stations 3 and 6), one from the 486 Pressure Zone (PRV Station 20), and one from the 425 Pressure Zone (PRV Station 7). These PRV Stations are shown in Figure 2-2. These PRV stations are normally not open, but are set to supply water during fire flow events and other high demand situations when pressures drop in the 325 Zone. The 325 Zone can also receive water on an emergency basis through a single, manually operated emergency intertie with OVWSD. Ground elevations vary throughout the 325 Zone from approximately 10 to 245 feet. Supply Facilities The City is supplied with water through the Alderwood Supply Station and maintains a standby emergency intertie with SPU for supply during emergency events. Alderwood Supply Station The City currently supplies the entire system with water purchased from AWWD, which in turn purchases the water from the City of Everett. The original source of the water is the Spada Reservoir, in the headwaters of the Sultan River (roughly 30 miles east of Everett). The Alderwood Supply Station is located in the City's 596 Zone at the intersection of 168th Street SW and Olympic View Drive. The supply station is a below -grade concrete vault, which receives water from AWWD's 635 Zone through a 24-inch transmission main. The station contains a 12-inch mainline meter and control valve and an 8-inch supplemental meter and control valve. The station includes a remote telemetry unit and is connected to the City's telemetry system through leased telephone lines. Modifications to the station were completed in 2010 to increase capacity of the supply facility, as planned in the City's 2010 Comprehensive Water System Plan. Seattle Public Utilities Emergency Intertie The emergency intertie with SPU is a below -grade concrete vault with a single 20-inch inlet pipe, 20-inch outlet piping, a 12-inch flow meter, and a 12-inch control valve that connects SPU's 592 Zone with the City's 596 Zone. The facility was originally used for primary supply to the south portion of the City's water system, prior to the City supplying the entire system with water purchased from AWWD. The facility is currently used by the City as an emergency intertie, in accordance with the terms and conditions of the 2011 agreement with SPU. 15-1662 Page 2-6 JLFPacket Pg. 39 8.A.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 2 1 WATER SYSTEM DESCRIPTION Water Treatment All water purchased by the City is treated before entering the City's distribution system. The City does not provide additional water treatment. Water purchased from AWWD is treated by the City of Everett's water filtration plant, located adjacent to Lake Chaplain. This plant provides filtration, chlorination and fluoridation. Additional chlorination is provided by AWWD at AWWD reservoir sites. Water treatment of the SPU supply is provided by the Tolt Treatment Facility, located near the South Fork Tolt River. Seattle provides filtration, ozonation, chlorination, and fluoridation at this facility. Pumping Facilities Five Corners Pump Station The Five Corners Pump Station is located at the same site as the Five Corners 1.5 MG and 3.0 MG Reservoirs on the north side of Bowdoin Way, west of the Five Corners intersection at 2121h Street SW and 84th Avenue West. The Five Corners Pump Station was constructed along with the Five Corners 3.0 MG Reservoir in 1978 on the same site. The primary purpose of the station is to pump stored water from the Five Corners reservoirs to the 596 Zone for fire flow and during peak demand periods to maintain a relatively steady supply through the Alderwood Supply Station, thereby minimizing large fluctuations in supply being demanded from AWWD. Improvements to the pump station were completed in 2010 and included replacement of pumps, valves, piping and variable frequency drives (VFDs). Control modifications were completed in 2016 that allow the station to operate in either pressure or flow control modes. The pump station contains two end -suction centrifugal pumps with 60 horsepower motors, each designed to pump 1,195 gpm at 130 feet total dynamic head. The station was designed with space for a third pump in the future. A standby engine generator at the site provides backup power supply to ensure the pump station is operational at all times (i.e., in the event of a power failure). Storage Facilities The City's water system has four reservoirs with a total combined storage capacity of approximately 7.5 million gallons. Two reservoirs (325 Zone 1.5 MG Seaview Reservoir, 325 Zone 1.5 MG Yost Reservoir) provide storage to the 325 Zone and the two other reservoirs (Five Corners 1.5 MG Reservoir, Five Corners 3.0 MG Reservoir) provide storage to the other pressure zones. A more detailed description of each reservoir is provided below. 15-1662 Page 2-7 JLFPacket Pg. 40 8.A.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 2 1 WATER SYSTEM DESCRIPTION 325 Zone 1.5 MG Seaview Reservoir The 325 Zone 1.5 MG Seaview Reservoir is located at Seaview Park, which is south of 184' Street SW at approximately 901h Ave West. The 119-foot square buried concrete reservoir was constructed in 1975 and provides approximately 15.0 vertical feet of water storage with an overflow elevation of 325 feet. The reservoir is filled with water from the 505 Zone through 8-inch inlet piping with an 8-inch flow meter and 8-inch control valve. The reservoir provides supply to the 325 Zone through its 12-inch outlet piping. 325 Zone 1.5 MG Yost Reservoir The 325 Zone 1.5 MG Yost Reservoir is located at 9537 Bowdoin Way, near the southern end of the distribution system. Similar to the Seaview Reservoir, the Yost Reservoir is a 119-foot square buried concrete reservoir. The reservoir is located beneath tennis courts at Yost Park. The reservoir was constructed in 1973 and provides approximately 15.0 vertical feet of water storage for the 325 Zone with an overflow elevation of 325 feet. The reservoir is filled with water from the 486 Zone Five Corners 1.5 MG Reservoir through 8-inch inlet piping with an 8-inch flow meter and 8-inch control valve. The reservoir provides supply to the 325 Zone through its 18-inch outlet piping. Five Corners 1.5 MG Reservoir The Five Corners 1.5 MG Reservoir is located just west of Five Corners at 8519 Bowdoin Way. The welded steel, 80-foot diameter reservoir was constructed in 1960 and provides water storage for the 486 Zone. The reservoir has separate 10-inch inlet piping that is elevated to the roof of the tank and 10-inch outlet piping. The reservoir is filled with water from the 596 Zone through 10-inch inlet piping with a 10-inch flow meter and 10-inch control valve. Five Corners 3.0 MG Reservoir The Five Corners 3.0 MG Reservoir is located on the same site as the 1.5 MG Reservoir at Five Corners. The welded steel, 104-foot diameter reservoir was constructed in 1979 and provides pumped water storage for the 596 Zone via the Five Corners Pump Station and gravity storage to the 486 Zone. The reservoir has separate 10-inch inlet piping and 10-inch outlet piping. The reservoir is filled with water from the 596 Zone through 12-inch inlet piping with a 12-inch flow meter and 8-inch control valve. Distribution System The City's water distribution system consists of approximately 136 miles of water main ranging in size from 4-inches to 24-inches in diameter. Most of the distribution piping is comprised of ductile iron water mains (61 percent), followed by cast iron water mains (38 15-1662 Page 2-8 JLFPacket Pg. 41 8.A.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 2 1 WATER SYSTEM DESCRIPTION percent). Table 2-1 summarizes the water mains throughout the City's distribution system by diameter and total length of each size. Table 2-2 provides a summary of the City's water mains by material type and total length of each. Table 2-1 Water Main Summary by Diameter Pipe Diameter (Inches) Total Length (miles) Percent of Total (%) < 4 1.80 1.33% 4 12.0 8.88% 6 37.3 27.5% 8 64.4 47.5% 10 2.03 1.50% 12 13.8 10.1% 14 0.18 0.13% 16 1.02 0.75% 18 0.31 0.23% 20 0.99 0.73% 24 1.82 1.34% Totals 135.7 T- 100% Table 2-2 Water Main Summary by Material Pipe Material Total Length (miles) Percent of Total (%) Cast Iron 51.7 38.1% Ductile Iron 82.3 60.6% HDPE 1.19 0.90% PVC 0.19 0.10% Other 0.32 0.20% Totals 135.7 100% The City has an ongoing comprehensive leak detection program, established in 2002, to identify and eliminate water system leaks. The program has included the use of private leak detection services and City staff for locating and identifying leaks. All leaks discovered have been repaired. This system -wide leak detection program is ongoing to ensure that leaks are detected early and promptly repaired. The City's annual water main replacement program has targeted replacement of older water mains, which are typically responsible for most of the leaks. Water main improvements planned by the City are identified in Chapter 9. 15-1662 Page 2-9 JLFPacket Pg. 42 8.A.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 2 1 WATER SYSTEM DESCRIPTION PRV Stations Pressure reducing valve (PRV) stations are connections between adjacent pressure zones that allow water to flow from the higher pressure zone to the lower pressure zone by reducing the pressure of the water as it flows through the station. PRV stations maintain a desired range of pressures in the lower zone. A PRV station is typically a below -grade concrete vault containing two pressure reducing control valves, piping, and other appurtenances. The control valve hydraulically varies the flow of water through the station to maintain a constant pressure on the downstream side of the valve as water flows into the lower pressure zone. PRV stations are placed in water systems to function in one of two ways. First, they can serve as an active supply facility by maintaining a continuous flow of water into a lower zone that has no other source of supply. The PRV stations serving the 505 Zone, 500 Zone, 425 Zone, and 420 Zone are this type. Second, a PRV station can serve as a standby supply facility by providing fire flow or emergency water supply. In this scenario, the main supply to the zone is from another source (e.g., supply facility or reservoir). This type of PRV station does not typically open to provide flow until the lower, or downstream, zone experiences a significant drop in pressure. Only then will the PRV station become active and allow flow into the lower zone. The PRV stations that supply the City's 486 Zone and 325 Zone are this type. The City's water system has a total of 17 active PRV stations, as shown in both plan view (Figure 2-1) and profile view (Figure 2-2). Since 2010, eleven new PRV stations have been constructed, where most of these are replacements of existing, older PRV stations. All the City's PRV stations are in below -grade concrete vaults. A listing of all PRV stations and related data is contained in Appendix C. Pressure Relief Facilities Pressure relief stations are installed in pressure zones supplied with water from a higher pressure zone or a high-pressure source. A pressure relief station typically consists of a below - grade vault housing a pressure relief valve, piping, and other appurtenances. Pressure relief stations protect the zone that it is installed in by discharging water out of the system when pressures in the zone increase beyond the set point of the pressure relief valve, thereby maintaining safe pressures in the zone. The pressure relief valve is normally closed and opens when the pressure in the zone increases beyond the set point of the valve. The valve opens and hydraulically varies the flow rate through the valve to limit the maximum pressure on the upstream side of the valve. A common application for a pressure relief station is to protect a pressure zone from high pressures when a pressure reducing valve in a PRV station fails in the open position and allows high pressure water to enter the lower pressure zone. As an alternative to installing standalone pressure relief stations, pressure relief valves can be installed within PRV stations on the lower pressure zone side of the pressure reducing valve. 15-1662 Page 2-10 JLFPacket Pg. 43 8.A.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 2 1 WATER SYSTEM DESCRIPTION The City has two standalone pressure relief stations in the 325 Zone. One is located in the northern portion of the zone and the other in the southern portion. The pressure relief facilities protect the 325 Zone from high pressures in the event of a "stuck open" valve failure of any of the 325 Zone PRV stations, since the originally installed PRV stations in the 325 Zone were not equipped with pressure relief valves. To further improve pressure relief in the 325 Zone and other pressure zones, the City has installed pressure relief valves within most of the recently constructed PRV Stations (#2, #3, #5, #6, #7, #8, #17, #18, #23, and #24). A pressure relief valve is also located within the Five Corners Pump Station to provide pressure relief for the 596 Zone. Water System Interties Water system interties are physical connections between two adjacent water systems that are normally separated by a closed isolation valve or control valve. Interties function as either a normal supply facility or an emergency supply facility. The City's Alderwood Supply Station is considered a normal supply intertie and the SPU Supply Station is considered a standby supply intertie. These interties are operated and maintained according to the previously discussed interlocal agreements. Emergency supply interties provide water from one system to another during emergency situations only. The City's five interties with the City of Lynnwood and six interties with OVWSD are considered emergency interties. These emergency interties are all normally closed and manually opened in the event supply from Alderwood Water District is disrupted or a portion of the system is affected from one or more water mains that are out of service. Telemetry and Supervisory Control System The City's telemetry and supervisory control system records water system data and provides automatic control of all supply, storage, and pumping facilities. The City's telemetry and supervisory control system also provides instant alarm notification to operations personnel in the event of equipment failure, operation problems, or other emergency events in the system. A summary of the City's telemetry and supervisory control system at each water system facility is provided below. All facilities are linked to the City's master telemetry unit at the operations facility via leased telephone lines. • Alderwood Supply Station: Monitors and records flow rate and pressure. Remote control of the control valve settings. Seattle Supply Station: Monitors and records flow rate and pressure. Remote control of the control valve settings. • Reservoirs: Monitors and records water level, chlorine residual, and reservoir fill rates. 15-1662 Page 2-11 JLFPacket Pg. 44 8.A.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 2 1 WATER SYSTEM DESCRIPTION • Five Corners Pump Station: Monitors and records suction pressure, discharge pressure (596 Zone), and flow rate. Adjacent Water Systems The area outside and immediately adjacent to the City's existing water service area is served by several public water systems, as shown in Figure 2-3. The following provides a brief description of each adjacent water system. Alderwood Water & Wastewater District The AWWD provides direct retail water service to the cities of Brier and Mill Creek, portions of the cities of Bothell and Mukilteo, and unincorporated areas of southwest Snohomish County. The AWWD also provides wholesale water service to the cities of Mountlake Terrace and Lynnwood, similar to Edmonds. The AWWD purchases all water supply from the City of Everett. There are no current plans for changes in water service area boundaries between the City and the AWWD. City of Seattle/Seattle Public Utilities The SPU direct water service area is located to the south of the City. SPU receives its water supply from the Cedar River and Tolt River watersheds. There are no current plans for changes in water service area boundaries between the City and SPU's direct service area. Olympic View Water & Sewer District The OVWSD is located to the south of the City and provides water service to a population of approximately 14,500 people as of 2014. The OVWSD service area includes the Town of Woodway, part of the City of Edmonds, and a portion of unincorporated Snohomish County. Most of OVWSD's water supply is purchased from SPU, though it also maintains its own sources. The OVWSD has six emergency interties with the City, as previously discussed. The emergency interties are located at: Intersection between Pine Street and Chinook Road, between OVWD 353 Zone and the City's 325 Zone. • Intersection of Elm Place and 7tn Avenue S, between OVWD 415 Zone and the City's 486 Zone. • Intersection of Birch Place and 7th Avenue S, between OVWD 415 Zone and the City's 486 Zone. 15-1662 Page 2-12 JLFPacket Pg. 45 8.A.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 2 1 WATER SYSTEM DESCRIPTION • Intersection of 8th Avenue S and Elm Way, between OVWD 505 Zone and the City's 486 Zone. • 220th Street SW, at approximately 7th Avenue S and 9th Avenue S, between OVWD 505 Zone and the City's 486 Zone. • Intersection of 76' Avenue W and 224' Street, between OVWD 540 Zone and the City's 596 Zone. No future interties were identified in the District's most recent Comprehensive Water System Plan, as of January 2015. However, a potential future emergency intertie could be installed near the intersection of 236' Street SW and Highway 99 where the City extended a 12-inch water main stub to the west side of the highway approximately 10 years ago when the highway was re -paved. There are no current plans for changes in water service area boundaries between the City and the District. City of Lynnwood Lynnwood is located to the east of the City and provides water service to a population of more than 36,650 people as of 2014. Lynnwood purchases all of its water from the AWWD. There are five manually operated emergency interties between Lynnwood's 573 Zone and Edmonds 596 Zone. The emergency interties are located at: • Intersection of 208' Street and 76th Avenue W. • 20910 Highway 99. • Intersection of Olympic View Drive and 1801h Street SW. • Intersection of Olympic View Drive and 73rd Avenue W. • Intersection of 68th and North Meadowdale Beach Road. There are no current plans for additional interties between Lynnwood and Edmonds and there are no current plans for changes in water service area boundaries between the two systems. City of Mountlake Terrace The City of Mountlake Terrace (Mountlake Terrace) is located to the east of Edmonds and provides water service to a population of approximately 21,090 people. Mountlake Terrace purchases all of its water from the AWWD. Mountlake Terrace's 2009 Comprehensive Water System Plan identified one future emergency intertie with the City. The emergency intertie would be located near the intersection of 226th Place SW and 73rd Place West, providing an emergency supply of water from the Edmonds's 596 Zone to the Mountlake Terrace 494 Zone At the time of this writing, the planned emergency intertie has not been constructed. There are no current plans for changes in water service area boundaries between the two systems. 15-1662 Page 2-13 J Packet Pg. 46 H:\EVT Projects\15\1662 E 8.A.a °V FDn9D FIGURE 2-1 �'lc. 1 89u Comprehensive Water System Plan Existing Water System murraysmith June 2017 Legend 0 Emergency Intertie Existing Water Mains: © Pressure Reducing Station 325 Zone Water Main ED Pump Station 420 Zone Water Main a Reservoir 425 Zone Water Main El Supply Station 486 Zone Water Main 0 Pressure Relief Facility 500 Zone Water Main ® Zone Valve (Closed) 505 Zone Water Main —I �— City of Edmonds Retail Water 596 Zone Water Main — Service Area Pressure Zones: Other Water Service Areas 325 Zone City Limits 420 Zone ■ ■ ■ Snohomish/King County Boundary 425 Zone 486 Zone IIIIIIIII� 500 Zone Note: Water main labels indicate 505 Zone the pipe diameter and material. 596 Zone / °RTHST✓PF ' ORIFT - PDOFT Puget N " ME ODV B"GI N S o u n d 6"HOPE o a"DI 0° 8DI HNO s.°, <N o' _ d"CI '6"CI u 8"CI e"cl W VISTA MOD-v Pressure Relief #19 SATERLN = PL - LN � S •4 I--� w iSTAPL OONTAI Va°�OPg zl� ¢ALOHAT m m CAR 193RD PL SW 194THPy SV9"CI B"CI a FUND, 151STST 151STSTSW a Ell I it 3 STOOD N I WATER & =WASTEWATER 0 2,000 �� DISTRICT 158TH ST 'I o _ Scale in Feet N 'PRO #3- m B DI r Pressure Relief # 4/f'7 _ - ' Future Emergent Intertie with City Lynnwood 573 Zc 8- h PI 6"DI O Supply froi PRV #2 AIR % Alderwoo( Water Distri (635 Zone 6"O' r PRV- ,s8T11sTs Q --, 8"DI I�`3 ✓0� `9�, eP•pR o #5V�- ° F) nlsTsrs'. S9LAWN PL 1 POST Q ry m OOL 1]2ND ST -- I�I'.� 8-DI SW ro F ��7> ISE SW 1T ND ✓i .l✓ 6.°I P-RV ✓ j e- BO > v; to E E I KP 1 5TH 5 5 i Imo` ,) zPRV #8 24D>B..D. .0 S P1-SW o 12"CI 184T m 12"DI o zSeaview 6"CI °PRV #13 B STH PI 9 W ¢Reservoir - 6"DI (1.5 MG) m 187THPLSW ]TH ST S 8"DI _ "DI sPRV #14E 8"DI 188TH ST ; DI 8"DI 8"DI m 189TH PL SW - r 1g0tH 191ST PL SW STSW o x3�1 T eQ m 8-DI 6"DIII 192ND ST SW PRV #15 1�bb - 'BOTH PLSW A 1815T PLSW 1A,,. SW 4rp\ ARV #10 185TH ST WsT �-' 8"DI- > 3 LN m 11 PLSw+191 1T ST SIERS$j BOTH 12"DI 6"CI 6"CI OPLW o 192ND PL SW' 193RD PL a 8.'DI �- m TCI Q WDI g .v ]TH 8"CfL 9 TH P 6 STSW Q - o Sw - CI e < 199TH ST SW^ v/ w o 2015T ST SW 202ND PL e z _ i 20 D m 203RD ST SW i D 6..DI 4"CI 6"CI FPLSW J �> g 2 < 4'CI ^� :e �' 6.0� 2 4T e"DI 8"D _ ✓� S 8"CI OALEv <_:r 4"CI ro _ - AT SW +° SPRAGUE ST - - O .G 2° o- W W - G"CI _ z 05TH PL 5 N 3 a 0 3 U " 6.'CI w n P 2 _ m Y - Q d Q 5 G 6•.DI ✓� z, ° a° 6' L oNDPRV'.#1 e � " d - 6"DI - e m 'DI .G1 m PRV 12 DI 8CI 8CI PIHINST 6 8'DI 0 8DI p DAYTON S' ry 12. - 8CI 8"CI 8"CI n In 208 N/PL 12"CI o Yost 'a =� C'C Ej 6"DI 2091H G +,✓' ♦ Y m ` W io ; - MAPLE IT s'DI 6-cl Reservoir_ EFiv_e COrnerS gi s"DI s 4 s�sw LDEIR ST w WALNUT ST 8"CI D HOLLY DR m 1A DI w -' <8 DI �1.5 MG [Reservoirs and n eP B"Dr o B"CI 12 DI - b StiF Pump StatlOn m � � da ° s a o �F P6 12"CI � cLDAHST dcl cEDARST - 1�5 MG) ,'C 12"DI m 8DI 16TH uU1 SP T o q S m r UNTO > IL4tiC - z� 213TH w W °j" "YqY 8^OI B"D1 °O,o 8D1 d"C 8"DI LAURELLN a P10 S a MLOCK STI ARFI x - r 214TH PLSW N3 10"C/ 21 ITH PLSW w PL SEAMONTLN 8 - P n 6"CI m 2ST BW w 0 > •, R -� LAU - Sl 1"T 21r,ZH ST sW - 215TH ST All -DI PL-1 ] � �^0►� P�,VES ¢ 6"CI _ � 215TH PLSW POINT I' 8DI 6"DI 216TH ST 6W 1 Emerggency Intertie a -DI - gg 21 TTH ST sw znTH ST sw zn6TH �w With OlympIC View - - - '° - _ 3 4.a s'DI STSW ^> FIR PL 1 i Water District �I m m 18TH ST SW 8DI m 6"DI 2118}H S SW z > fi"DI �� Woodway 353 Zone I w =o - N - • 8-DI ELM ST < U - g0 v.. F' ICI _ CZ Zl PRV #20 V P m HD i m ez Dnvew IV,TH T SW 8"DI 5 6"Dl d DI o . T ,� m � 12.' is � 3 °O Emerge" enc Interties wl 220TH PL y Emergency Interties I g Y 9 �; 221STPLSW a S� with Olympic View with Olympic View �' of lA - w l ]�� 31 eIRGH sr :Water District9.-�IIII I', QP Water Districts BIRCH 223RD ST t•h ase H-!�a^ r^; 13TH WAV SW ''TTTTT 505 Zone ^A9F sW 1_ - O OOCN O�4152.one; y `1' 13TH WAY �z 224TH ST SWaan"e a 223f2p 5T. rOO q,9O 14TH STSW 224TH ST SWa r- II, O I SS x rw I 3: 224TH PL SW G Emergency Intertie r r225TH w 224TH PLSW with Olympic View l - - ALGONpU1N R0 �2fiTH^T SW WP m ^ _ : FPL SW 0pv `" 22 TH PL SW Q A 226TH, 6T ST Water District 1 4� L% 226TH PL SW I 22-H o540 Low Zone 226TH e ..J L _ _ 227TH PL SW - 2 ]TH PLSW w _1ZB711yT SW �sw m T r ' r228TH ST SW 228TH PL SW .. An �r�'T� .. ? N OEER DR oJw _4;0. .. ...�'- l �Pl - 229TH UNINCORPORATED S w ST Sw229TH rL I'i RO 22ITH PLSW o -• - r .. EOMON°S SW •• WAGHUa ! 236TH SNOHOMISHJ 230TH ST SW 8'DI sTsw COUNTY W231ST PITS Q� 'a �y15T PL SW 23151 A SW 3� Q 232ND PLSW W 4 i WSWQ Q z 4 80- OLYMPIC VIEWS m z3z�PL sww HOLLY LN x gyp.'--- s72s TOWN WOODWAYHDSETTRD �j PPaP WATER & SEWER DISTRICT 239TH ✓ is NOTTINGHAM RD 3234TH PLS a c PLSW m t-�2i4ItlSS.51"� 0 8"DI W a m w 104 I MADRONA LN 8"DI ' 235TH PL SW n < W 1 235TH PLSW ✓--- m m a 23sTH � - Vj'OODHAVEN 3 i a 236TH ST SW PL SW gym, >ILI I�I�II I II 3 w O ✓ PL 236TH PL SW _ZIW' .�J• 1.1.E C 'CI J I 3'e m 236TH °' ¢ 236TH ST SW 6"CI tr- ✓' ISTSW ' 3 SW Q 1S 237TH PL SWi N .Q m 48T ^ A>T PO/ 9A, 238TH ST SW r m \•- I�,,� O 1'CW HHL ✓ N .IA Ia O° I= 23TTS 3 � - P 238TH ST Sw °j '<� -��J Lkc38TH ST SW I � 1z 239TH w ~ w �r-�' 2p°Lnm PL III _~ f If a 239TH m .`° a 'O - 6.G QY SJ 246TH ST SW i 49'L2�'o PL SW 240TH IT SW ry •• ' OOg�W� ° AVE W °NI\CK,N 240TH PL SW 246TH 3 - "m" 1. „IILL„ 24DTH ST SW 81DI 246TH PL SW PL SW o m IJ d F a a o (m 20.1ST PL SW- _.L !. I... _ ' o° ]9PT`y> zazrlD srsw "' O AILLN N 2ND F 42ND Standbyy Supply from d 242NDS SW B,N ,_ o SSW 242NDp� PL SIN Seattle UbIIC IhtleS eERRY LN mLN z4srtD PL sw - ■tti Jl-.& 0_0-a r T sT W SNOHOMISH�COUNTY (592 Zone) E°MGNDgWy r li ■ ■ ■ *-Ei-s -W- 1 6.. moo; W The City of Edmonds makes no representations, express or implied, rl2 HArw'��` s as to the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information KING COUNTY G displayed. This map is not suitable for legal, engineering, or surveying SEATTLE PUBLIC purposes. Notification of anyy errors is appreciated. Source: City of Edmonds GIS, Washington State Dept. of Health and UTILITIES Snohomish County GIS (March 2016). r o CU IYI V IV U:. a 0�w dC�60 96 DIIA PRV #23,1 B"DI PRV — #16 4CI fi"DI ®4(' c\ 196TH ST 6"p1 IOGT 7 202ND 3 PLSW m 118TH -A iN MtLP�j$� (C PLSW Al ns � ro 180TH 6"CI IIFI�IL r FT 1815T PL SW - U 'BOTH ST' SW 8"D1 3 MISFITS, ty T L W m 181ST PL SW �< , 81ST PL t 182ND ST SW BPC, SW b 182ND ST SW NY a 183RD L- DOGE g"N?,SN/ 183RD PLSW sw o Emergency Interties a O B"DI ° with City of Lynnwood ST SW = , U TH PL 185THSTSw 573 Zone ` .. 86TH STIR �I I 180TH ST'N, wry O PRV #24 N P LF ran918]TH # PRV 187TH PL S W O I88TH PL SW G PENNY LN tO s y� 189TH PL SAI `O m O 1 S3 89TH PL SW 5 }1 ^ cu 190TH ST SW 1WTH ST SW }' 191STPLSW 1915T PL j S Pj, 3S191ST ST SW v y - 192ND PL SW ti 5' DAL 192NO PL SW '0 SW �� °c PARKW DI 1931D ST S,, ~ 06 �1941H ST SW I 194TH ST SW NNTH IST SN/ -� STS JITN I a524-��-Lip- ,9] �. I: 198THSTS1 S(y S�. _.--.. _. .I •� 198TH PLSW �I29orHITsw CITY OF I LYNNWOOD 200TH ST 2015T ST SW SIN ^ �201ST PL �201STa 3m SW OIL SW F P, �r 3 m 202ND ST N, 99 a 204TH ST SW 29y TH ST SW = 204TH ST All r O N � Emergency, Interties DI with City of Lynnwood 573 Zone l ._•r 12"CI 8"DI 8"DI WITH ST :•' 4J�LLLL� - 8..DI - I _j ^ru ILL 210TH ST W 210TH STSW E _ - 6^DI I u -� L " a .I 21rt�(_.��? (j) 8" CI 8 DI 8"CI 212TH ST SW - - "' m 215TH ST SW � ,yi - 213TH PLSW 6,y ¢ � ��.f ' (13 - ST SW W 81DI Y- 216TH ST SW m° �®i 12"DI 6"DI P 218TH ST SW11 S `' 8"DI iy 219TH ST W 8"CI 220TH ST SW .--' 1221S PL .. 220TH PL22;SW SN/ W 22, ST PL SW � jST SW CU 3 � 2., 224TH ST SW r 22 2 �P��224TH o ■ 1a o .c; IT .� w o a zzsrH N 225TH PLSW 22; PLSW `O ST 226TH STSW ^ 226TH Y\ ti 226j 226TH PL $W ST SW SW WI H 2PLSW CITY OF "STSW a$ MOUNTLAKE 128TH ITS, - 229TH TERRACE �fJz 3'PL SW � 230Ty Npq ono ST o W G 530Ty _ ST D m ~ W r., 232ND ST SW 232ND 232ND PL 0 2321 Fc SW PLS - w m 2331 Qm Q PLS - A 239TH z F2,8q'( Va _ PL III 235TH PL SW 236TH L�L4L, I Lake Ballinger NORTH CITY WATER Packet Pg. 47 1 8.A.a ti r N d d V C O Q ti r O N d C 7 7 C fC d E O r N cn L O E W r E :.i Q Packet Pg. 48 650 ALDERWOOD WATER & WASTEWATER DISTRICT SUPPLY (635 ZONE) ---------------- 600 596 ZONE 550 u cn a500 500 ZONE � 1 Q w m m 450 N 400 Ln wl N N IJbU 325 N �o 300 cn c� w �Iw NI �I �I �I wl E 0 E PRV #2 PRV #5 PRV #3 PRESSURE RELIEF STATION #4 LEGEND 596 ZONE 505 ZONE 500 ZONE 486 ZONE 425 ZONE 420 ZONE 325 ZONE ------ ADJACENT SYSTEM (veld uaalsAS .aa1eM 8A1su9y9adw03 L1,0Z 10 u011e1u8s8ad : L9�Z) MalAGN AOu36V LOZ aunt ueld WOWS a81eM spuOwP3 :1u8ua43e11V NORTH SOUTH ■----�-U 1� J - CITY OF LYNNWOOD R.(573 ZONE) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PRV #8 T T PRV #9 PRV #6 ZONE #7 PRV #24 PRV #10 PRV #14 PRV #15 & 13 PRV #16 V PRV #17 596 ZONE OE=489' 1.5 MG RESERVOIR D I AMETER: 80' 3.0 MG RESERVOIR 37, 7 600 GAL/FT M EL:9 DIAMETER: 104' 420 ZONE I I 6� 540MGAL/FT EL:5 FIVE CORNERS RESERVOIRS & PUMP STATION OE=325' 1.5 MG 1.5 MG OE=325' SEAVIEW RESERVOIRL-1104YOST RESERVOIR DI M: 119'x 1 19' PRESSURE RELIEF D I M: I 19'x 1 19' BOTTOM EL: 310' BOTTOM EL: 310' 105,924 GAL/FT STATION #19 105,924 GAL/FT - PRESSURE REDUCING STATION/VALVE N ISOLATION VALVE CONTROL VALVE PRESSURE RELIEF VALVE INTERTIE PUMP STATION OFACILITIES AT SAME SITE PRV #23 PRV #18 �i T ►A ABBREVIATIONS EL ELEVATION FT FEET MG MILLION GALLONS OE OVERFLOW ELEVATION as v 6 a d Y V M SEATTLE PUBLIC UTILITIES a STANDBY SUPPLY (592 ZONE) 600 550 ---------------------- OLYMPIC VIEW WATER DISTRICT LOW ZONE (540 FT) ------------------- OLYMPIC VIEW WATER DISTRICT 900 (505 ZONE) 486 ZONE 450 PRV #20 �S� -------------------------- Li- OLYMPIC VIEW WATER DISTRICT (415 ZONE) 400 OLYMPIC VIEW WATER DISTRICT 350 WOODWAY ZONE (353 FT) 7 ----------- 300 .k°� ED"'2 FIGURE 2-2 1 i /*C. 1890 Comprehensive Water System Plan Existing Water System Hydraulic Profile murraysmi7h June 2017 (veld W04S (S .aa;eM anisuayaidwOO LW 10 uoi;e;uasaad : L9�Z) MainaM AOuOBV LW aunt ueld wOlsAS aa;eM spuOwP3 :;uauay3e44V R Q 06 PUSTST 151STSTSW 8.A.a Rp ^50TH PL °` F°'''� FIGURE 2-3 � s Comprehensive Water System Plan Service Area and Adjacent Water Systems murraysmith June 2017 Legend City of Edmonds Retail Water Service Area _ Alderwood Water District City of Lynnwood City of Mountlake Terrace Olympic View Water & Sewer District ,L Seattle Public Utilities M North City Water District City Limits ■ ■ Snohomish/King County Boundary 1'� N 0 2,000 Scale in Feet Ii I� sF PL ALDERWOC WATER & I� —IL 3ti- 1 Ii r11LrLI—L-. ��uIIIIIITTFmr-ice- ����LauIH stet'•✓ ,�,aTl4 / 50NSFT�y a �. 1815T PL SW : /� �181ST PLSW69K� 182NDiST $W W 181ST PL SN �� ��.. i b° j 182ND PL SW I LSN/ 182ND ST IN OOE WV 3 ¢ ` �N 182NOP 183RD F•-• F - P ^ ' QS' 183RD PL SW ^AIRD PL SW 3 184TH ST SW e ¢ YTA p Puget,• m P 1a5TH$T5W 185THST$W a '� 185TH PL SO i 185TH PL I 185TH ST SW 3 186TH ST SW 185TH ST SW .13—PLSW Sound 1A6THPLSWm 111THPL$w _ d�� `\ _.� W '86THSTSW 85THPL I� 1Z5, 18]TH ST SW 18>TH ST SW `LLJJI `� '/ RCS 1WR STSW 181TH �� ��` 'a W *■ 187TH PL SW 188TH PL SW > 'i 50 m, 'BATH PL SW y N r cO w s PENNY LN tO F BLARE PL m r 189TH /. WATER ST STSW R` a J v 189TH PL SW oaf r 1a9TH PLsw r ,89TH PL sW ��p CHERRY ST 19 ro�Oq 191sT PL SW m ? ,BOTH ST SW `�' 190TH ST SW 19OTH I%Q p (sw 3 1911T9"' . i� 191STPLSw �i'ST$T$W CITY OF ;.: 192NDSTIvy I_rL.i iyl 916T$T$ LYNNWOOD s �.= [.. SIERK, 192ND PL SW 192ND PL SW 11 191ST ST SW S� pq 3 ORs' CR °� CITY OF o A 193RDPLSW 192N0 PL SW a PARK WY D AM 193RD ST SW �� RIZTwOQp °Fw EDMONDS TL� r� EXCELSIOR PL rr 1 o ^19a1\AST SW w 194TH ST SW T- p 195TH ST SW I c I Q PUGET DR PUGET SIB 196TH $T SW 19fiTH $T sW z �/' mPUGETWAV -.... -. - j 96TH ST $ J524 PUGET WAV MELODYLN s' 19)TN HINDLEY 198TH ST SW .� N O OKmfRE DR VIEWLAND WAY Q,I r y HE\NZ eY w _ II,�-,rl a m m z BROOKMERE DR NI rJ ,sTy 199TH ST SW �19ATH ST SW ' u t.:> ,••m m 198TH PL SW ¢ GASPERS ST i �ySA ""•Tr ` .a L ',fir o 200TH ST S. ~ -k2°OTH ST SW L ' GILMER LN. m QPSPE; .... VISTA PL F z ¢ - m w I 200TH ST SW ' SATER LN w O N w 201sT ST SW w w 2015T ST SW J ,O ALOHAWAY ALOHA ST _ VISTA P-'•q m > ■ m S OP i 202ND ST SW > ¢ ■� J1 �: ryS CAROL WAV - I:''� d 202ND PL SW 202ND PL SW SIERRA PL x m 202ND ST $W Do m N Oy GLEN ST j .o 'GLEN ST SIERRA ST D0a 203RD ST INr = o DALEY PL - rHST sw 99 DALEY ST¢ ...... _ 2—H ST SW e NDssr >¢ 2T �. w z04TH ST Sw ^ 2p4rH ST sw 204TH sT sw e SPRAGUE ST SPRAGUE ST HPLti �jR/ Op @F( SPRAGUE STD Z �Nt� 205TH PL SW ST S EDMONDS ST EDMONDS ST EDMONDS ST"' "A 296TH ST SW r � � I PJO; a S�. 206TH ST SW ��O OPO 4iP iS ....:..:SELL ST BELL $T Y(i 0 m j -� 207TH PL SW Q _ .MAIN ST R z f i'Fi r -ia- ssT $wI.L DAYrb oaTH fPLEAS r �— — .29aTH ST $w zMAPLE ST4"' I,. _ __ Q21STH sr sw V p y ALDER ST ' r h ALDER ST L Q i 0 00 A" /r� , SA {�WT)i�� .. i L.' _L_rjJJ "-'l.'`!i O Pay m ~ M1 Il Lw I_ 211TH ST SW WALNUT 5T1��r ���j�� '•, ' J ( ParuJm� C" q m a m - - ¢ HOLLY DR�•,y { ceDAa sr' -"CEDAR ST o • FyR ; ° _ c " CEDAR PL O w P w io 211TH ST SW l iJL:. > uwoNO� �sPRucE sr a sPRucE ST �R0 sHF/ ��- y ( p HOMELANDDR '� !p = •[I O° .� w' LAUREL LN 9.SiQ �• gO 4 m N213TH ST SW �'... HEMLOCK WAY > > F vF m WDO/- _� 3 a y NW 214TH PL SW 214TH PL 3W j 2 LAUREL WAV i s LL AY ' 213TH PL SW FREED DR 214TH PLSW > II pNOC .p° N LAUREL Si � .� 215TH ST 215TH ST SW s 215TH ST SW r RD PINE 9T 'r1�Tr•�r. 215TH PLSW] 215TH SS Soy-,' STSW F ..m I 215TH FL SW /� tN z w ~ isTHPLSw ..,: •. w 216 HP ST SW o a FORSVTH LN,�_-�_.k"'i.y ,. .".� z s, _216TH $T SW 3 3 •�' s 21TTH ST SWr (�j I'.; w a '�� 216TH ST SW 1P, FIR PL N x - - ... FOM1 5- ON FIR PL FIRST - - 218TH PL SW I!r .,µ!"', 218TH ST $W a~ .iL'' m �J' le WY i O ELM ST 9 E AY U SEA J -- m W 218TH ST SW �, 218TH ST SW�'K •�'� BELLA COOLA RD I > ° 11'Y LM ¢ ~ w uwHi3' Li rj 1\ = 219TH ST SW •I t _ G Z 8 219TH ST SR1 i� TN2 1 ¢ j s - 9 2ND AVE W r 219... ■ C'GO WHITCOMg PL I ._Z �P LM S �i�LMS\� 220�H ST SW- — T —s— — — — — — — — — — — � � L+_ \ O° ELM1TPL O Zm I o Z 220TH PL SW _ , 220TH ST SW • r J IRCH PL O of qyc 221ST PL 7 SW I F I �� 3 wCh as 3 r I 3 3 3 QP D I ¢ 9EfRDH3THAT Lakee 3 r a a ( 00 �P KULSHANB T ;y LF 1WAV SW �' �I WAV m �� F I r ti p0 I 99 s 13TH WAY 1F� 224TH ST SW a w 2234aC �TJYV• ,^ozl Odo �O I O PT ST 224TH ST SWI 224TH ST SW L.a w Z ( , 3 224TH PL $W ST 224TH ` m3 224TH ST SW P 224TH n i224TH IL SW N s 3 7■r 224TH ST sw< W ALGONQuIN RO I �26TH^T sw ~ ^ w a o OD YN k5 m r 221THPLSVV a.I 225TH PLSW �I Go r Q226rHPLS: 226TH PL SW I N " 226TH ST SW 225TH PLSW IF L 226TH STSW N ° m P1sa J1� ,i 226TH PL SW 1I ao m 227TH PL SW SR, m ti 22 Q 0 ._ J 227TH ST Sr 228THST SW r 9 �2 ¢ F I yST Sty r 228TH PL SW NDEeR DR 229TH PL °� sw Foy I UNINCORPORATED 3 �74$ CITY OF I SIN HOMISH ti 230TH ST SRI MOUNTLAKE j TOWN OF WA�I, w COUNTY: _ TERRACE o OLYMPIC VIEW WOODWAY I t 23,$TPL$w A,$ $ $w ^ WATER & SEWER sow rsw STs vq DISTRICT - 232ND sw : 232NPLSWQ — -mil Op ` HOLLY LN "O �w m 232ND ST SW m �' 232ND V,ACHUSETT RD = NOTTINGHAM RD C MADRONA LN 4• 4. '. 235TH PL cw _ n 235Tm 3 .1 'r-3 r A m5 '----- SZ SW o^, m H PLSW �I,T}�i. -� 2,j61N 3 I236TH PL SW 236TH ST SW I I 3 236TH ST SW i� d Z 1 33 m 23— PL SW 236TH ST SW Iw23SW i 23]TH PL SW u m ' TA aTH ST $Wy P P>T _ 3 I Al L PO//yT W 3 3 Q 23]TZ' 3 m m238TH ST SW 3 238TH ST 5N' a �' �.ql ' 71 p w Lake I � � a � I e �P� 1 - Ballinger I �y I 9TH IT $w Ory 2,1 9 H $T $W m I o 5� l N41GK 5N I 240TH PL SW M. 240TH ST SW ' ; ro Q3, 3 i WE w W �o � o � o H 9c 246TH PL sw 3 3 3 1I11II . r <� Qc2 ' 4� 1A 2415T ST$W m I TOTEM POLE LN `< 2niST PL SW i �- QUAIL LN 242ND ST SW Y 241ST PL SW 5 m ? �•r—fIII�II'I' 5� 242NDA LP, °' °� • -�_ !.'! 242ND ST SW 242ND PL SIM ` ,rY e 2/yDP\. CN N 3 242ND ST SW r . ... BERRY LN mLN ' 241R° PL $W a A8 a SNO/iOMISH COUNTY wN E°MONO$ w s� � a � � � r atii'�-�-��s�- a� _ � I;� E , R The City of Edmonds makes no representations, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information KING COUNTY m f FF�° �•� �.�.y displayed. This map is not suitable for legal, engineering, or surveying purposes. Notification of anyy errors is appreciated. SEATTLE I NORTH CITY Source: City of Edmonds GIS, Washington State Dept. of Health and PUBLIC UTILITIES WATE Snohomish County GIS (March 2016). f Packet Pg. 51 8.A.a ti r N d d V C O Q ti r O N d C 7 7 C fC d E O r N cn L O E W r E :.i Q Packet Pg. 52 8.A.a CHAPTER 31 LAND USE AND POPULATION Introduction This chapter demonstrates the compatibility of the City of Edmonds' (City) Comprehensive Water System Plan (Plan) with the City's Comprehensive Plan, identifies designated land uses within the City limits, and presents population data. The City's Comprehensive Plan was originally completed in 1995 to meet the requirements of the State of Washington Growth Management Act (GMA) and was updated most recently in July 2015. Compatibility with Other Plans The City's Comprehensive Plan and GMA were reviewed to ensure that the Plan is consistent with the City's land use policies. Growth Management Act The State of Washington GMA, which was passed in 1990 and amended in following years, defined four goals relevant to water system planning: 1. Focus growth in urban areas and reduce sprawl; 2. Maintain consistency between land use and utility plans; 3. Ensure adequate public facilities and services, concurrent with growth; and, 4. Designate and protect critical areas. Urban Growth Area The City is considered an urban growth area in accordance with the GMA, per RCW 36.70A.110. The City has coordinated with Snohomish County in designating its approximately 5,700-acre urban growth area (UGA). The City UGA is bounded on the south by the City of Shoreline, on the southwest by the City of Woodway and unincorporated Snohomish County areas, on the west by the Puget Sound, and on the east by the cities of Lynnwood (northeast) and Mountlake Terrace (southeast). Consistency The plans and policies of the City and Snohomish County must be consistent in accordance with GMA, per RCW 36.70A.100. The GMA also requires consistency with the implementation of water system plans and comprehensive plans, per RCW 36.70A.120. 15-1662 Page 3-1 J Packet Pg. 53 8.A.a of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water Svstem Plan CHAPTER 31 LAND USE AND POPULATION The Municipal Water Law, which became effective in 2003, also requires consistency of water system plans with local plans and regulations. Confirmation of consistency under this law is achieved by means of completing the Consistency Statement Checklist, which must be included with all water system plans. A signed copy of this checklist is included in Appendix D. Concurrency The GMA requires concurrency, so that adequate public facilities and services are available when growth occurs to ensure health, safety, and a high quality of life. The GMA requires that growth be located in areas already served or readily served by public facilities and services, per RCW 36.70A.110. Critical Areas The GMA requires that critical areas be designated and protected. Critical areas include wetlands, steep slopes, and aquifer recharge areas. Appendix E contains a State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) checklist that was prepared for this Plan addressing environmental issues. City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan The City updated its Comprehensive Plan, adopted in July 2015, to extend the planning horizon through 2035 and to accommodate additional people, jobs, and community needs. The Comprehensive Plan was originally prepared in 1995 to comply with the requirements of the GMA and RCW 35A.63, which covers Planning and Zoning in Code Cities. It provides policy that is consistent with Snohomish County on land use, housing, capital facilities, transportation, and parks and recreation issues for a 20-year period. The Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan includes goals and policies for planning growth and development over a 20-year planning period. The Utilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan includes goals and policies to ensure that new development will be adequately served without impacting existing levels of service. The Community Culture & Urban Design Element is a new section that acknowledges the impact of community culture and design on development. The Community Sustainability Element of the Comprehensive Plan includes goals and policies addressing climate change, community health, and environmental quality. This section addresses improved physical appearance, walkability, protection of natural environments, and residential characteristics. The City also developed a Climate Change Action Plan in 2010 to address accomplishments to date and identify additional efforts planned by the City to achieve a more sustainable community. Elements of this plan related to the City's water system include water conservation and rainwater capture from rooftops to reduce per capita water consumption, and implementation of capital improvements utilizing energy efficient equipment to reduce power consumption at water system facilities. 15-1662 Page 3-2 JLFPacket Pg. 54 8.A.a of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water Svstem Plan CHAPTER 31 LAND USE AND POPULATION At the regional level, the City of Everett (Everett) and the Everett Water Utility Committee (EWUC) have conducted studies to evaluate the impacts of global climate change on its water supply to ensure that the long-term planning of the region's future water supply accounts for the effects of climate change. The City is a member of the EWUC, which is an advisor to the Water Supply Forum, consisting of representatives of public water systems and local governments in the Central Puget Sound region of Washington State. The Water Supply Forum addresses current and future water supply issues facing the region and has documented the projected effects of climate change on the region's water supply situation in the Regional Water Supply Outlook, which was published in 2009 and most recently updated in 2012. Land Use The land area within the limits of the City is approximately 8.9 square miles (5,700 acres) and includes approximately five miles of marine shoreline along Puget Sound. The City is mostly built -out (approximately 96 percent developed), based on current zoning, with limited infill and redevelopment potential remaining. The City's water service area is approximately 7.1 square miles (4,532 acres) and is smaller than the city limits, due to a portion of the south area of the City being served by Olympic View Water and Sewer District (OVWSD). The City's Comprehensive Plan Map, which is included as Figure 3-1, shows the various land uses throughout the City. As shown on the map, most of the City is single family residential and includes a smaller portion of multi -family residential, mixed use commercial, and other land uses. Approximately 61 percent of the land area within the City is currently designated for single-family residential use; 6 percent is designated for multi -family residential use; 7 percent is designated for mixed use commercial use; and the remaining 26 percent is designated for other uses such as public right of ways, parks, schools, and open space. Population Household Size Trends The average household size in the City has declined over the past three decades, which is consistent with the decreasing household size trend of the nation. Average household size in Edmonds, including both single family and multi -family residences, has decreased from 2.41 persons per household in 1990 to 2.32 in 2000 and 2.26 in 2010. The average household size for all of Washington State was 2.51 persons per household in 2010. 15-1662 Page 3-3 JLFPacket Pg. 55 8.A.a of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water Svstem Plan CHAPTER 31 LAND USE AND POPULATION Existing & Future Population Population density in the City remained constant between 2010 and 2014, at 6.9 persons per acre, and increased to 7.0 persons per acre in 2015, based on Washington State Office of Financial Management (OFM) data. In comparison, the City of Lynnwood had a density of 5.6 persons per acre in 2015 and the City of Mountlake Terrace had a density of 8.3 persons per acre in 2015. Table 3-1 shows past and projected populations within the entire City limits, and the City's water service area, which is smaller than the City limits. From 2009 to 2015, the City's water service area population remained relatively constant, from an estimated 31,350 people in 2009 to 31,716 people in 2015, as shown in Table 3-1. The population within the City's water service area is anticipated to increase during the 20-year planning period of this Plan to an estimated population of 35,127 people in the year 2035. The population projections shown in Table 3-1 are based on the City's planning target population of 45,550 people within the City limits in the year 2035, which was developed by the City as part of the cooperative planning process for the region. The population projections for 2021, 2025, and 2035 are based on an interpolation using the City's 2015 and 2035 population values. Table 3-1 Historical Population and Future Projections Year Population Within City Limits Population Within Edmonds Water Service Area Historical 2009 40,900 31,350 2010 39,709 31,209 2011 39,800 31,286 2012 39,800 31,271 2013 39,950 31,299 2014 39,950 31,290 2015 40,490 31,716 Projected 2021 (+6 years) 42,407 32,703 2025 43,282 33,378 2035 (+20 years) 45,550 35,127 15-1662 Page 3-4 JLFPacket Pg. 56 8.A.a ti r N d d V C O Q ti r O N d C 7 7 C fC d E O r N cn L O E W r E :.i Q Packet Pg. 58 8.A.a CHAPTER 4 1 WATER DEMANDS Introduction This chapter summarizes past water demands and future projected water demands for the City of Edmonds' (City) system. These are used in Chapter 8 to analyze the existing water system facilities and form the basis for sizing future water system improvements described in Chapter 9. The different types of demands that were analyzed include: average day demand, peak day demand, peak hour demand, fire flow demand, and future projected demands, both with and without estimated reductions from water conservation efforts. This chapter also summarizes the City's water demand data collection and reporting procedures. Current Population & Service Connections The City provided water service to a population of approximately 31,290 in 2014, as shown in Chapter 3. The City has categorized all water customers into four different classes for billing purposes: Single Family Residential, Multi -Family Residential, Commercial or Industrial, and Government or Education. Water was provided to 10,177 metered water service connections in 2014. Of these, approximately 8,757 (86 percent) were single family residential accounts, 639 (6 percent) were multi -family residential accounts, 530 (5 percent) were commercial or industrial accounts, and 251 (2 percent) were government or education accounts. The demand analysis in the following section summarizes the past water use of the four water customer classes. Existing Water Demands Seasonal and Other Factors Affecting Water Demands The total demand of all customers will vary both throughout the day and over the course of the year for any public water system. The following factors have the greatest impact on water demands in a public water system: 1) population, 2) weather, and 3) type of customer. As population increases, the overall, long-term demand is expected to increase. Weather primarily influences short-term demands, where the higher outdoor temperatures during the summer months results in increased water usage, which is mostly due to outdoor landscape irrigation. Water usage patterns vary among different types of customers. For example, single family residential customers typically use more water than multi -family residential customers, primarily due to the outdoor lawn watering and irrigation practices of single family residences. Similarly, demands can be affected by conservation efforts targeting water reduction through smarter and more sustainable practices. 15-1662 Page 4-1 JLFPacket Pg. 59 8.A.a of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water Svstem Plan CHAPTER 4 1 WATER DEMANDS Water Consumption Water consumption is the amount of water that customers use as measured by their water meters. Table 4-1 shows past water consumption data from 2009 through 2014. While population data was known for the year 2015, there was incomplete production data and, therefore, the year 2014 served as the baseline for projections. As shown in the table, the majority of the City's overall water consumption is attributed to single family residential customers. Although more than 86 percent of the City's customers are single family residential, they only use approximately 60 percent of the total water consumed. This is due to the lower amount of usage per single family resident as compared to other types of customers. Table 4-1 Average Annual Metered Consumption and Service Connections Customer Class Year Single Family Multi- Family Commercial/ Industrial Government/ Education Totals Average Number of Connections 2009 8,683 631 519 233 10,066 2010 8,699 638 521 237 10,095 2011 8,701 639 525 244 10,109 2012 8,709 639 528 247 10,123 2013 8,733 639 531 248 10,151 2014 8,757 639 530 251 10,177 Average Annual Consumption (1000 gallons) 2009 661,637 203,992 169,676 20,789 1,056,095 2010 571,488 192,516 156,982 15,515 936,500 2011 556,556 196,711 159,685 23,083 936,035 2012 559,094 196,844 163,580 14,461 933,979 2013 582,047 192,648 173,946 24,599 973,240 2014 579,428 196,055 171,989 27,133 974,605 Average Daily Consumption Per Connection (gal/day/conn) 2009 209 886 896 244 2010 180 827 826 179 2011 175 843 833 259 2012 176 844 849 160 2013 183 826 897 272 2014 181 841 889 296 Average 184 844 865 235 As shown in Table 4-1, single family residential customers used an average of 184 gallons per day per connection. This is less than the average of 208 gallons per day per connection 15-1662 Page 4-2 JLFPacket Pg. 60 8.A.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 4 1 WATER DEMANDS presented in the City's 2010 Comprehensive Water System Plan for years 2003 through 2008 and less than the average consumption of the other customer types. Other customer classes are anticipated to have greater consumption per connection, since several multi -family units are often served from a single connection and commercial/ industrial customers are often the highest users of water in a public water system. Table 4-2 shows the top 20 water customers with the highest consumption in 2014. The total water consumption of these customers represents approximately 12 percent of the total consumption for 2014. Table 4-2 consists mostly of multi -family complexes, municipal facilities, and commercial properties. Table 4-2 2014 Largest Water Users Name A Address L Water Use Type Annual Consumption (gal) City of Lynnwood 17000 76th Ave W Domestic 33,660,096 Swedish Edmonds Hospital 21601 76th Ave W Domestic 15,439,045 99 Ranch Market 22511 Highway 99 #104 Domestic 10,074,764 Sterling Crest Condominiums 19515 86th Ave W Domestic 8,137,310 Extendicare 21400 72nd Ave W Domestic 4,400,790 Swedish Medical Center 21632 Highway 99 Domestic 4,106,805 Edmonds School District #15 7600 212th Ave W Irrigation 3,947,470 Park Ballinger Apartments 22924 76th Ave W Domestic 3,677,424 BCD Tofu House 22511 Highway 99 Domestic 3,564,468 Ballinger Court Apartments 22707 76th Ave W Domestic 3,316,863 Edmonds Landing Retirement 180 2nd Ave S Domestic 3,236,073 Harbor Square Athletic Club 160 W Dayton St Domestic 3,169,496 Highland Park Condominiums 500 Elm Way Domestic 2,813,424 Point Edwards HOA 45 Pine St Domestic 2,685,507 Maplewood Manor 8516 196th St SW Domestic 2,315,969 Point Edwards HOA 75 Pine St Domestic 2,307,740 Andy's Motel 22201 Highway 99 Domestic 2,259,117 Anthony's Home Port 456 Admiral Way Domestic 2,256,873 Plum Tree Plaza 22315 Highway 99 Domestic 2,237,424 Kimm & Associates 23515 Highway 99 Domestic 2,109,507 Largest Water Users Total 115,716,164 Water System Total 974,604,717 Percent of Total 12% 15-1662 Page 4-3 JLFPacket Pg. 61 8.A.a of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water Svstem Plan CHAPTER 4 1 WATER DEMANDS Water Supply Water supply refers to water that is delivered to a water system. Water supply differs from water consumption in that water supply is the amount of water delivered into a water system and water consumption is the amount of water taken out of the system. For any given year, the amount of water supply will be greater than the amount of water consumption, due to water system leaks that exist in all water systems and other factors discussed below. For the City, water supply represents water that is purchased from the Alderwood Water & Wastewater District (AWWD) and delivered through the City's Alderwood Supply Station. Table 4-3 summarizes the total amount of water that was supplied to the City's system from 2009 through 2014, the average population within the City's retail water service area, the average day demand of the system, and the per capita demand for each year. As shown in Table 4-3, per capita demand varied from year to year, with an overall trend of decreasing per capita water demand. This decreasing trend is most likely the result of water conservation efforts and reflects a similar trend among other public water systems throughout the Puget Sound. The City's average per capita demand from years 2009 through 2014 is 95 gallons per day, which is less than the per capita demand of 104 gallons per day presented in the City's 2010 Comprehensive Water System Plan for years 2003 through 2008. This average per capita demand value is used later in this chapter to forecast water demands in future years, based on the population projections presented in Chapter 3. Table 4-3 Historical Supply and Per Capita Demands Year Average Population Annual Supply (1000 gallons) Average Day Demand (gpm) Average Day Demand (MGD) Average Demand Per Capita (gal/day/capita) 2009 31,350 1,178,070 2,241 3.23 103 2010 31,209 1,067,511 2,031 2.92 94 2011 31,286 1,085,479 2,065 2.97 95 2012 31,271 1,054,815 2,007 2.89 92 2013 31,299 1,072,086 2,040 2.94 94 2014 31,290 1,065,003 2,026 2.92 93 2015 31,716 872,131 1,659 2.39 75 Average (2009-2014) 95 Table 4-4 shows the average demand of each of the City's pressure zones, based on 2014 water demand data. Almost half of the overall water system demand is within the 596 Zone and almost one-third of the demand is within the 325 Zone. 15-1662 Page 4-4 JLFPacket Pg. 62 8.A.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 4 1 WATER DEMANDS Table 4-4 2014 Demands by Pressure Zone Pressure Zone 2014 Annual Supply (1000 gallons) Average Day Demand (gpm) Average Day Demand (MGD) Percent of Total Demand (%) 596 539,957 1,026 1.48 50.7% 505 44,730 86 0.12 4.2% 500 20,235 38 0.05 1.9% 486 80,940 154 0.22 7.6% 425 11,715 23 0.03 1.1% 420 25,560 48 0.07 2.4% 325 341,866 652 0.94 32.1% Total 1,065,003 2,026 2.92 100% Authorized Consumption & Distribution System Leakage Authorized consumption is the amount of water authorized for use. This includes water customers' usage and other authorized uses such as water main flushing, street cleaning, and permitted hydrant use. All unauthorized uses and any water that cannot be accounted for is considered distribution system leakage. In other words, distribution system leakage is an unrecorded volume of water that may include water system leaks, inaccurate supply metering, inaccurate customer metering, unknown fire hydrant usage, illegal water service connections, and unknown reservoir overflows. The Water Use Efficiency Rule, which became effective in January 2007, requires all public water systems to calculate and report annually distribution system leakage on a 3-year rolling average and as a percentage of total supply. If the amount of distribution system leakage exceeds the 10 percent threshold established by the Water Use Efficiency Rule, a water loss control action plan must be prepared and implemented by the water system. This plan will need to identify steps and timelines for reducing leakage. The difference between the amount of water supplied to the City from AWWD and the amount of metered water consumption from 2009 through 2014 is shown in Table 4-5. The table also includes the amount of other authorized water uses, annual distribution system leakage, and the 3-year rolling average of distribution system leakage as a percentage of total supply. The estimated amount of authorized uses shown in the table is from City maintenance records. The table illustrates a trend of decreasing distribution system leakage as a percentage of total supply, which likely reflects the City's implementation of a more aggressive annual water main replacement program that started in 2010. 15-1662 Page 4-5 J Packet Pg. 63 8.A.a of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 4 1 WATER DEMANDS Table 4-5 Metered Supply and Consumption Comparison Total Net Net Other Distribution System Leakage Supply Total Difference Difference Authorized Year ( 1000 Consumption ( 1000 ° as of /° Uses 1000 ( (1000 % of Total gallons) (1000 gallons) gallons) Total Supply gallons) gallons) Supply (3-yr Avg) 2009 1,178,070 1,056,095 121,976 10.35% 31,879 90,096 - 2010 1,067,511 936,500 131,010 12.27% 12,709 118,302 - 2011 1,085,479 936,035 149,444 13.77% 28,720 120,724 9.9% 2012 1,054,815 933,979 120,837 11.46% 19,716 101,120 10.6% 2013 1,072,086 973,240 98,845 9.22% 8,569 90,277 9.7% 2014 1,065,003 974,605 90,398 8.49% 3,379 87,019 8.7% Table 4-6 presents 2014 water supply and consumption data and the methodology used to calculate distribution system leakage on an annual basis, prior to the calculation of a 3-year rolling average. Table 4-6 2014 Estimated Distribution System Leakage Description Total Amount (1000 gallons) A. Total Purchased Supply 1,065,003 B. Total Metered Consumption 9174,605 C. Estimated Authorized Uses (flushing, street cleaning, permitted hydrant use) 1,456 Distribution System Leakage (A-(B+C)) 88,942 Distribution System Leakage as % of Total Purchased Supply 8.4% Amount shown for distribution system leakage may be from water main and water service leaks, meter inaccuracies, meter reading & recording errors, illegal water use, and other uses not identified above. Equivalent Residential Units The demand of each customer class can be expressed in terms of equivalent residential units (ERU's) for demand forecasting and planning purposes. One ERU is equivalent to the amount of water used by a single family residence. The number of ERU's represented by the demand of the other customer classes is determined from the total demand of the customer class and the demand per ERU from the single family residential demand data. Table 4-7 shows the number of ERU's calculated for each customer class from 2009 through 2014. 15-1662 Page 4-6 J Packet Pg. 64 8.A.a of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water Svstem Plan CHAPTER 4 1 WATER DEMANDS Table 4-7 Equivalent Residential Units (ERUs) Year Average Number of Connections Average Annual Demand (1000 gallons) Average Day Demand per ERU (gal/day/ERU) Total ERU's Single Family Residential 2009 8,683 738,054 233 8,683 2010 8,699 651,436 205 8,699 2011 8,701 645,413 203 8,701 2012 8,709 631,429 199 8,709 2013 8,733 641,162 201 8,733 2014 8,757 633,173 198 8,757 Average (2010-2014) 201 Multi -Family Residential 2009 631 227,553 233 2,677 2010 638 219,447 205 2,930 2011 639 228,117 203 3,075 2012 639 222,311 199 3,066 2013 639 212,214 201 2,890 2014 639 214,240 198 2,963 Commercial/Industrial 2009 519 189,273 233 2,227 2010 521 178,942 205 2,390 2011 525 185,180 203 2,496 2012 528 184,744 199 2,548 2013 531 191,613 201 2,610 2014 530 187,942 198 2,599 Government/Education 2009 233 23,190 233 273 2010 237 17,685 205 236 2011 244 26,769 203 361 2012 247 16,331 199 225 2013 248 27,097 201 369 2014 251 29,649 198 410 System -Wide Totals 2009 10,066 1,178,070 233 13,860 2010 10,095 1,067,511 205 14,255 2011 10,109 1,085,479 203 14,634 2012 10,123 1,054,815 199 14,549 2013 10,151 1,072,086 201 14,602 2014 10,177 1,065,003 198 14,729 15-1662 Page 4-7 JLFPacket Pg. 65 8.A.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 4 1 WATER DEMANDS The demands shown in Table 4-7 are based on supply data that was computed from the consumption of each customer class and the difference between total metered supply and consumption from each year. The system -wide average demand per ERU from 2010 through 2014 was 201 gallons per day, which is less than the average demand per ERU of 236 gallons per day presented in the City's 2010 Comprehensive Water System Plan for years 2003 through 2008. The 2009 demand data was not used in the average computation as it was outside the range of demands for the other years and significantly different than the following five years. The City's average demand per ERU of 201 gallons per day is used later in this chapter to forecast ERU's in future years, based on estimated future demands. Average Day Demand Average Day Demand (ADD) is the total annual amount of water delivered to a system divided by the number of days in the year. ADD is determined from the water system's historical water supply data and is used to project future system demands. ADD data is also used to determine standby storage requirements for water systems. Standby storage is the volume of a reservoir used to provide water supply under emergency conditions when supply facilities are out of service. Water supply records were used to determine the system's average day demand, which is shown in Table 4-3. Peak Day Demand Peak Day Demand (PDD) is the maximum amount of water used throughout the system during a 24-hour time period of a given year. PDD typically occurs on a hot summer day when a large amount of outdoor lawn watering occurs simultaneously with other water uses. In accordance with WAC 246-290-230 - Distribution Systems, the distribution system must provide fire flow at a minimum pressure of 20 psi during PDD conditions. Supply facilities (i.e., supply stations, pump stations, interties) are typically designed to supply water at a rate that is equal to or greater than the system's PDD. Water supply records and reservoir telemetry reports are typically used to determine a system's PDD; however, complete telemetry records of supply and reservoir data were not available to compute the PDD of the system. Therefore, the PDD was estimated by applying a typical peak day demand to average day demand ratio of 2.00 to the system's actual average day demand amount. This results in an estimated PDD of 4,052 gpm for 2014, as shown in Table 4-8. Peak Hour Demand Peak Hour Demand (PHD) is the maximum amount of water use, excluding fire flow, during a one hour time period of a given year. In accordance with WA 246-290-230 - Distribution Systems, new public water systems or additions to existing systems shall be designed to provide 15-1662 Page 4-8 JLFPacket Pg. 66 8.A.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 4 1 WATER DEMANDS domestic water at a minimum pressure of 30 psi during PHD conditions. Water main sizing and analysis and equalizing storage are typically based on PHD data. The PHD, like the PDD, is typically determined from the combined flow of water into the system from all supply sources and reservoirs. Similar to the PDD, sufficient information was not available to calculate the City's PHD based on actual system data. Therefore, the PHD was estimated based on a typical PHD/PDD ratio of 1.80, resulting in a PHD of 7,294 gpm for 2014. The peaking factors shown in Table 4-8 are based on the demand data shown in the table. These peaking factors are used later in the chapter in conjunction with projected ADD to project future PDD and PHD for the system. Table 4-8 Peak Day Demands and Peaking Factors Peak Day Demand Data Demand Type Date Demand (gpm) Average Day Demand (ADD) 2014 2,026 Peak Day Demand (PDD) Data unavailable Assumed PDD/ADD = 2.0 4,052 Peak Hour Demand (PHD) Data unavailable Assumed PHD/PDD = 1.8 7,294 Peaking Factors Description Peaking Factor Peak Day Demand/Average Day Demand (PDD/ADD) 2.00 Peak Hour Demand/Peak Day Demand (PHD/PDD) 1.80 Peak Hour Demand/Average Day Demand (PHD/ADD) 3.60 Fire Flow Demand Fire Flow Demand is the amount of water required during firefighting as defined by applicable codes. Fire flow requirements are established for individual buildings and expressed in terms of flow rate (gpm) and flow duration (hours). Fighting fires imposes the greatest demand on a water system due to the high rate at which water must be supplied over a short period of time. This requires that each component of the system be properly sized and configured to meet the most stringent demand placed on it. General fire flow requirements were established for the different land use categories to provide a target level of service for planning and sizing future water facilities. The general fire flow requirement for each land use category within the City's service area is shown in Table 4-9. The water system analyses presented in Chapter 8 are based on an evaluation of the water system providing sufficient fire flow in accordance with these general fire flow requirements. 15-1662 Page 4-9 JLFPacket Pg. 67 8.A.a of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water Svstem Plan CHAPTER 4 1 WATER DEMANDS Table 4-9 General Fire Flow Requirements Land Use Category Fire Flow Requirement (gpm) Flow Duration (hours) Single Family Residential 1,000 2 Multi -Family Residential 3,000 3 Commercial/Business/Mixed Use 3,000 3 Schools 3,000 3 Hospital 1 5,000 1 4 11 Future Water Demands Method of Projecting Demands Future demands were calculated from the projected population data from Chapter 3 and the per capita demand data from Table 4-3. The demand projections were computed with and without a further reduction in water use from conservation. The per capita demand of existing customers (95 gallons per day) was used for all demand projections without water conservation. The future water demand projections with conservation were based on a reduced per capita demand that reflects the City's water use reduction goals, as shown in the City's Water Use Efficiency Program in Appendix F. Future Water Demand Projections Table 4-10 presents the estimated water demands of the system each year for the next ten years and at the end of the 20-year planning period. The actual demand data from 2013 and 2014 is also shown in the table for comparison purposes. The future ADD values were projected based on population estimates for the given years and the estimated per capita demand values. The future PDD values and PHD values were computed from the projected ADD values for that year and the existing system peaking factors shown in Table 4-8. The future demand projections are shown both with and without estimated reductions in water use from achieving the City's conservation goals. The 20-year projected demand data without conservation reductions was used for the evaluation of the planned improvements presented in Chapter 9 to ensure that the future system will be sized properly to meet all requirements, whether or not additional water use reductions from conservation are achieved. 15-1662 Page 4-10 J Packet Pg. 68 8.A.a of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water Svstem Plan CHAPTER 4 1 WATER DEMANDS Table 4-10 Future Water Demand Projections Description Historical Projected 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 (+6 yrs) 2021 2022 2023 2024 (+10 yrs) 2025 2034 (+20 yrs) 2035 Population Data Population in Water Service Area 31,299 31,290 31,716 31,878 32,042 1 32,206 1 32,371 1 32,536 32,703 32,870 33,039 33,208 33,378 34,948 35,127 Demand Basis Data (gal/day/capita) Average Day Demand without Conservation 94 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Average Day Demand with Conservation 92 92 91 90 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 88 88 Average Day Demand (gpm) Demand without Conservation 2,040 2,026 2,092 2,103 2,114 2,125 2,136 2,146 2,157 2,169 2,180 2,191 2,202 2,306 2,317 Demand with Conservation 2,026 2,037 2,025 2,013 2,001 2,011 2,021 2,032 2,042 2,052 2,063 2,136 2,147 Average Day Demand (MGD) Demand without Conservation 2.94 2.92 3.01 3.03 3.04 3.06 3.08 3.09 3.11 3.12 3.14 3.15 3.17 3.32 3.34 Demand with Conservation 2.92 2.93 2.92 2.90 2.88 2.90 2.91 2.93 2.94 2.96 2.97 3.08 3.09 Peak Day Demand (gpm) Demand without Conservation 4,079 4,053 4,185 4,206 4,228 4,249 4,271 4,293 4,315 4,337 4,359 4,382 4,404 4,611 4,635 Demand with Conservation 4,053 4,073 4,050 4,026 4,001 4,022 4,042 4,063 4,084 4,105 4,126 4,271 4,293 Peak Day Demand (MGD) Demand without Conservation 5.87 5.84 6.03 6.06 6.09 6.12 6.15 6.18 6.21 6.25 6.28 6.31 6.34 6.64 6.67 Demand with Conservation 5.84 5.87 5.83 5.80 5.76 5.79 5.82 5.85 5.88 5.91 5.94 6.15 6.18 Peak Hour Demand (gpm) Demand without Conservation 7,343 7,295 7,533 7,571 7,610 7,649 7,688 7,727 7,767 7,807 7,847 7,887 7,927 8,300 8,343 Demand with Conservation 7,295 7,332 7,289 7,246 7,202 7,239 7,276 7,314 7,351 7,389 7,427 7,689 7,728 2013 and 2014 Peak Day Demand and Peak Hour Demand values are based on actual average day demand amounts for the given year and the City's peaking factors, and may not represent actual peak demands for these years. Water reductions are based on the Everett Water Utility Conservation Program, with a target reduction of 5.9% by 2019. 15-1662 Page 4-11 JU17Packet Pg. 69 8.A.a Packet Pg. 70 8.A.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 4 1 WATER DEMAND Future ERU Projections Table 4-11 presents the projected number of ERU's of the system for years 2020, 2024, and 2034 relative to the baseline year of 2014. The 6-year, 10-year, and 20-year ERU forecasts are based on the projected water demands from Table 4-10 and the system -wide average demand per ERU that was computed from recent demand data, as shown in Table 4-7. The projections for 2021, 2025, and 2035 are also provided for reference. Table 4-11 Future ERU Projections 2020 2021 2024 2025 2034 2035 Description Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected (+6 yrs) (+10 yrs) (+20 yrs) Demand Data (gpm) ADD, without 2,146 2,157 2,191 2,202 2,306 2,317 Conservation ERU Basis Data (gal/day/ERU) Demand per ERU, 201 201 201 201 201 201 without Conservation Equivalent Residential Units (ERU's) Total System ERU's 15,400 15,500 1 15,700 1 15,800 16,500 16,600 Water Demand Data Collection and Reporting Demand Data Collection The demand data presented in this chapter includes both the supply and use (i.e., consumption) sides of water demands, which the City has collected and recorded for many years. The supply side data is recorded by a water meter in the Alderwood Supply Station that is connected to the City's SCADA system. This provides a continuous recording of the volume and rate of water supply into the City's system. The City's other supply station, which provides a standby source of supply from Seattle Public Utilities regional system, is also metered and connected to the City's SCADA system. On the water use side, customer demand data is recorded by meters at all water service connections and collected every other month. Also included on the water use side and recorded with portable meters is permitted water use from fire hydrants for construction, street cleaning, and water main flushing. 15-1662 Page 4-13 J Packet Pg. 71 8.A.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 4 1 WATER DEMANDS Demand Data Reporting A summary of past water use is reported each year in the City's Water Use Efficiency Annual Performance Report, which is one of the requirements of the Water Use Efficiency Rule. In addition to this annual report, the City will continue to report demand data when updating its water system plan in the future. 15-1662 Page 4-14 Ju Packet Pg. 72 8.A.a CHAPTER 51 POLICIES AND DESIGN CRITERIA Introduction The City of Edmonds (City) strives to provide high quality water service at a reasonable cost to its customers. This is achieved through the guidance of the following laws, policies, and design criteria that are applied to operating, maintaining, and planning improvements for the water system. Federal Regulations • U.S. Department of Health & Human Services • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency State Regulations Washington State Department of Health Washington State Department of Ecology County Regulations • Snohomish County Council City Regulations and Policies • Edmonds City Council Design Criteria • American Water Works Association • Washington State Department of Health The Edmonds City Council must adopt policies that meet or exceed those established by governments above them. The governmental entities above the City Council include the U.S. Government, Washington State, and the Snohomish County Council. The City's policies are documented and implemented through ordinances, operation procedures, engineering and construction standards, and design criteria. The City's water system policies and design criteria are organized and presented in this chapter under the following sections: water service, water supply, and facility policies and design criteria. The City's financial policies are described in Chapter 10. 15-1662 Page 5-1 JLFPacket Pg. 73 8.A.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 51 POLICIES AND DESIGN CRITERIA Water Service Policies New Water Services • The City will provide potable water service to all people within its water service area, provided all policies related to service can be met. Requests for new water service will be processed by the City's Building Division as part of a Building Division permit. Applications are reviewed to ensure the proposed service is located within the City's retail water service area and will be evaluated by the Engineering department using the City's water model to determine fire flow availability, meter size, line size and improvements necessary for adequate water pressure, fire flow, looping or extensions. New water service applications will be processed within the following timeframes: o New single family residence: approximately 60 days o New commercial building: approximately 90 days o New fire connection: approximately 20 days • Water system improvements and extensions required to provide water service to proposed developments will be reviewed and approved by the City, and must conform to the City's current design criteria, construction standards and specifications, as shown in the City's Water System Construction Standards contained in Appendix G. All costs of the improvements and extensions will be paid by the applicant. Delays affecting the City's ability to provide new water service are the responsibility of the applicant. Delays resulting from non -technical conditions may include environmental assessments, local ordinances, annexations, and various other issues. • Disputes received by the City are routed to the appropriate department and resolved. Disputes not resolved by City staff are resolved by the City Council with assistance from the City's legal counsel, as necessary. • Water service requests for areas outside of the City limits without annexation will be reviewed by the City Council after coordinating with the appropriate adjacent water system and the Department of Health. Water service to areas outside of the City limits shall be in compliance with Snohomish County's adopted land use plan, zoning and development regulations. • Water system capacity is evaluated as part of the City's update of its water system plan to confirm the system's ability to provide adequate water service to both existing and future water customers. 15-1662 Page 5-2 JLFPacket Pg. 74 8.A.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 51 POLICIES AND DESIGN CRITERIA Annexations • Areas annexed without existing municipal water service will be served by the City. • Areas annexed with existing municipal water service must meet the City's water system standards. • The City will follow state guidelines in the assumption of facilities in annexation areas. • The City will comply with the existing water supply agreement with Alderwood Water & Wastewater District in assuming portions of adjacent water systems as a result of annexation. Water Supply Policies Water Quality • The City will strive to provide high quality water while complying with all water quality regulatory requirements. • The City will promptly respond to situations that may adversely affect water quality. Water Quantity • The City will provide a sufficient quantity of water supply to existing customers and plan for at least 20 years into the future for meeting the needs of the water system. • The City will size new water system facilities and improvements to existing facilities to have sufficient capacity to meet the needs of the water system. Water Use Efficiency • The City will promote the efficient and responsible use of water and will participate in the Everett Water Utility Regional Conservation Program. • The City has a water use efficiency program. Documentation from the City's water use efficiency program is contained in Appendix F. 15-1662 Page 5-3 JLFPacket Pg. 75 8.A.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 51 POLICIES AND DESIGN CRITERIA Cross -Connection Control • The City strives to protect its water system from contamination due to cross -connections and has developed a cross -connection control program for eliminating cross - connections. Documentation from the City's cross -connection control program is contained in Appendix H. • The City regularly reviews building permit applications for potential cross connections. • The City will comply with the backflow prevention assembly installation and testing requirements as indicated in WAC 246-290-490 and as published in the manual titled Cross Connection Control Manual Accepted Procedures and Practice, Pacific Northwest Section, American Water Works Association (AWWA). • The City has staff that is certified for backflow prevention and testing. Facility Policies & Design Criteria This section describes the policies and design criteria used in planning for water system replacements, extensions, and future improvements. Water Pressure • The City will supply water to all customers at a minimum pressure of 30 psi at the water meter during all demand conditions, except under fire flow or emergency situations. During fire flow situations, the City will maintain a minimum pressure of at least 20 psi at the water meter for all customers throughout the system. • The City will provide pressure reducing stations to control pressures in the distribution system and avoid high pressures. It is the customer's responsibility to install an approved pressure regulator on the customer side of the water meter to maintain pressures at 80 psi or less. Pipeline Velocities • All new distribution system water mains will be designed to deliver the required amount of flow at a velocity of 10 feet per second (fps) or less. Velocities exceeding 10 fps are acceptable within short lengths of pipe and within water system facilities. • All new transmission mains will be designed to deliver the required amount of flow at a velocity of 10 fps or less and will be evaluated for hydraulic surges (transient conditions) using a hydraulic model capable of surge analyses. 15-1662 Page 5-4 JLFPacket Pg. 76 8.A.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 51 POLICIES AND DESIGN CRITERIA Storage Facilities • A sufficient amount of storage will be provided within the distribution system to facilitate the operation of the water system by maintaining adequate distribution system pressure and to provide supplemental supply during peak demand periods and emergency events. • Storage facilities will be sized to provide stored water for the following purposes: o Operational storage will be available to aid in the operation of supply and pump facilities. o Equalizing storage will be provided to supply the water system under peak demand conditions, when the system demand exceeds the total rate of supply of the supply facilities. Equalizing storage must be maintained above an elevation that provides a minimum pressure of 30 psi at all service connections under peak hour demand conditions. o Standby storage will be provided to supply the water system under emergency conditions when supply facilities are out of service. Standby storage must be stored above an elevation that provides a minimum pressure of 20 psi at all service connections under peak hour demand conditions. o Fire suppression storage will be provided to supply water to the system at the maximum rate and duration required to extinguish a fire at the building with the highest fire flow requirement. Fire suppression storage must be stored above an elevation that will provide a minimum pressure of 20 psi at all service connections under peak day demand conditions. Transmission & Distribution Mains • All new transmission and distribution mains will be looped to increase reliability and fire flow capacity, unless the City determines that looping is not practical. • All new water mains will be designed under the direction of a professional engineer licensed in the State of Washington and will comply with the water quality testing and construction completion requirements of the DOH. • All water system improvements and installation of new water mains shall be in accordance with City standard specifications and details. • The diameter of all new distribution water mains will be reviewed by the City and may include hydraulic analyses using the City's hydraulic model. 15-1662 Page 5-5 JLFPacket Pg. 77 8.A.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 51 POLICIES AND DESIGN CRITERIA • Dead-end water mains with fire hydrants shall be at least 8-inch diameter pipe up to the fire hydrant. If approved by the City, short dead-end water mains without fire hydrants, generally less than 50 feet long, may be constructed with 6-inch diameter or smaller pipe. • Distribution water mains providing fire flow shall be sized to provide the required fire flow at a minimum residual pressure of 20 psi and maximum pipeline velocity of 10 fps under peak day demand conditions. • All new water mains will be ductile iron pipe (class 52 minimum) with cement mortar lining. • The following valves shall be installed with the water main: o Isolation valves shall be installed at locations along the water main to allow sections to be shut down for repair or installing services. On average, the maximum distance between isolation valves shall be 350 feet. A minimum of three valves shall be provided per cross and two valves per tee. o Zone valves shall be located at all pressure zone boundaries when a water main crosses a pressure zone boundary and connects into each pressure zone. o Combination air and vacuum release valves shall be placed at all high points of water main installations. Water Services All residential water service lines shall be 1-inch diameter or larger. The meter shall be 3/4-inch diameter or larger. • All new customer service lines serving new structures, shall be installed with a pressure reducing valve on the customer's side of the water meter. The valve shall be placed within the structure being served. Supply Stations and Pump Stations All supply station and pump station improvements shall comply with the following minimum standards: All structures shall be non-combustible, where practical. All buildings shall have adequate heating, cooling, ventilation, insulation, lighting, and interior work space. 15-1662 Page 5-6 JLFPacket Pg. 78 8.A.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 51 POLICIES AND DESIGN CRITERIA • All sites shall be fenced and locked to prevent unauthorized personnel from entering the water system facilities. Below -grade facilities located in areas that cannot be fenced shall be secured and locked. • Each station shall be equipped with a flow meter, pressure gauges, pressure transmitters and all necessary instrumentation to assist personnel in operating and troubleshooting the facility. • Backup power shall be provided at all pump stations to maintain full operation during power outages. • Pumps shall be operated automatically with the ability to operate manually. • The monitoring of stations and adjustment of control settings shall be capable locally and remotely. All supply and pump stations shall be monitored with alarms for the following conditions: • Pump started automatically or manually. • Low suction pressure. • High discharge pressure. • Flooding and fire. • Power phase failure. • Communication link failure. • Intrusion by unauthorized personnel. All supply and pump stations shall have the following data recorded: Flow rate and flow totalizing. Incoming and outgoing pressures. All alarm conditions. Pressure Reducing Stations All pressure reducing stations shall be constructed according to the City's standard plans. • Below -grade concrete vaults shall drain to daylight, drain to a storm pipe system, or be equipped with a sump pump. • A pressure relief valve shall be installed on the low-pressure side of the pressure reducing valve to prevent system over -pressurization in case of a pressure reducing valve failure. The pressure relief valve shall be sized by the City using the City's 15-1662 Page 5-7 JLFPacket Pg. 79 8.A.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 51 POLICIES AND DESIGN CRITERIA hydraulic model. It may be necessary to place the pressure relief valve in a separate vault. Fire Hydrants • The City has established policies for the installation, maintenance and ownership of fire hydrants within the City limits, which include the water service areas of both the City and Olympic View Water and Sewer District. • Fire hydrants serving detached single family dwellings or duplex dwellings on individual lots shall be located not more than 600 feet on center such that all single family lots are within 300 feet from a fire hydrant, as measured along the path of vehicular access. If dead-end streets or driveways, singly or in combination, are over 300 feet long, additional public hydrants shall be installed such that hydrant spacing does not exceed 600 feet. • Fire hydrants serving any use other than detached single family dwellings or duplex dwellings on individual lots shall be spaced an average of 300 feet apart on center and shall be located so that all structures are located within 150 feet of a hydrant. If dead- end streets or driveways, singly or in combination, are over 150 feet long, then additional fire hydrants shall be installed so that the hydrant spacing does not exceed 300 feet. • All fire hydrants shall be installed at street intersections where possible. Fire hydrant spacing shall be measured along vehicle access routes. • The City Fire Marshal will review all proposed fire hydrant installations to ensure the correct number, location and spacing of fire hydrants for each project. 0 Additional requirements for fire hydrants are contained in the City Fire Code, Chapter 19.25 of the Edmonds Municipal Code. This code is provided in Appendix I. 15-1662 Page 5-8 JLFPacket Pg. 80 8.A.a CHAPTER 6 1 WATER SOURCE AND QUALITY Overview This chapter describes the City of Edmonds' (City's) existing water source and current water quality regulations. Also discussed are the City's water quality monitoring program, monitoring requirements, and results of past water quality monitoring. Water Source Alderwood Water & Wastewater District Supply The City currently supplies its entire system through the Alderwood Supply Station with water purchased from Alderwood Water & Wastewater District (AWWD). AWWD, in turn, purchases its water from the City of Everett (Everett). The supply of wholesale water from the AWWD to the City is provided under the terms of the 2010 Water Supply Agreement (see Appendix A). The agreement states "The water delivered by the District to the Master Meter shall comply with state and federal standards for drinking water and be of the same standard and quality normally delivered to the District's other customers". Therefore, the quality of water entering the City's system is the same quality as the water delivered to the District's retail customers. The Everett raw water supply originates in the Spada Reservoir, created by the Culmback Dam on the Sultan River approximately 25 miles east of Everett. The basin is protected and patrolled. The raw water passes through the Snohomish County PUD No. 1 Power House prior to entering the Chaplain Reservoir. Water from Chaplain Reservoir is delivered to the Everett Water Filtration Plant before supply to Everett, AWWD, the City, and several other water systems in Snohomish County. Prior to 1983, the supply of water from Everett was limited to treatment consisting of sedimentation, screening, and chlorination due to the good quality of its source. However, a higher level of treatment eventually became necessary due to more stringent water quality regulations. In 1983, the Everett Water Filtration Plant was constructed to meet these needs, including chlorination and fluoridation. Additional chlorination occurs at the reservoir sites within the AWWD service area. This ensures sufficient chlorine residuals throughout the distribution system. Source water quality has been good in the past and should continue to meet all of the mandated water quality requirements with the Everett Water Filtration Plant and the AWWD disinfection program. 15-1662 Page 6-1 JLFPacket Pg. 81 8.A.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 6 1 WATER SOURCE AND QUALITY Seattle Public Utilities (SPU) Supply The SPU Supply Station is operated in standby mode for short-term use as either an emergency supply or to provide additional supply for fire flows, since all water is now purchased from AWWD. The supply of wholesale water from SPU to the City is provided under the terms of the 2011 Water Purveyor Contract and its subsequent amendments (see Appendix A). The primary source of water that the City receives from SPU is from the Tolt River at the South Fork Tolt Reservoir, about 15 miles east of Duvall. Water is diverted, first, from the reservoir into the Tolt Regulating Basin, then to the Tolt Treatment Facility and, finally, into the Tolt Pipeline No. 1. This pipeline transports the water to purveyors that are primarily located both north and south of Seattle. SPU's water is delivered to the City from SPU's Richmond Highlands Tank, which is supplied by direct pumping from the Tolt transmission line, the Lake Forest Park Reservoir, or the Bitter Lake Pump Station. A 20-inch diameter water main spanning Fremont Avenue to NE 205th Street, at the King County/Snohomish County border, transmits SPU water from the Richmond Highlands Tank to the City's SPU Supply Station. Drinking Water Regulations Overview The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulates the quality of drinking water in the United States. The EPA is allowed to delegate primary enforcement responsibility for water quality control to each state under provisions of the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA). The Department of Health (DOH) is responsible for implementing and enforcing the drinking water regulations in the State of Washington. For the State of Washington to maintain primacy (delegated authority to implement requirements) under the SDWA, the State must adopt drinking water regulations that are at least as stringent as the federal regulations. The State, in cooperation with DOH, has published drinking water regulations in Chapter 246- 290 of the Washington Administrative Code (WAC) to meet these stipulations. The City's water system identification number is 225004, as issued by the State of Washington DOH. Safe Drinking Water Act The SDWA was enacted in 1974 as a result of public concern about water quality. The SDWA sets standards for quality of drinking water and requires water treatment should these standards not be met. The SDWA also sets water testing schedules and methods that water systems must follow. In 1986, the SDWA was amended due to additional public concern and frequent contamination of groundwater from industrial solvents and pesticides. These amendments identified source water protection, operator training, funding for water system 15-1662 Page 6-2 JLFPacket Pg. 82 8.A.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 6 1 WATER SOURCE AND QUALITY improvements, and public improvements as pivotal components of safe drinking water. The 1986 Amendments also require water systems to monitor and treat for a continuously increasing number of contaminants identified in the new federal regulations. Since implementation of the new regulations was marginally successful and slow, the SDWA was amended again and re -authorized in August of 1996. Water Quality Monitoring Monitoring Requirements Water quality monitoring requirements are contained in WAC 246-290-300. The City of Everett provides source water quality monitoring of its surface water source. The City of Edmonds provides water quality monitoring throughout its distribution system. In accordance with section (2)(b) of WAC 246-290-300, the City must comply with the following monitoring requirements since it receives completely treated water from another public water system: Collect coliform samples in accordance with subsection (3) of WAC 246-290-300. In summary, this consists of: a) Collecting a minimum of 30 coliform samples per month based on the population served and submitting the samples to a certified laboratory for analysis. i) Collecting and submitting additional samples as required when a coliform sample is determined to be invalid. b) Preparing a Coliform Monitoring Plan and updating it as necessary. 2. Collect disinfection byproduct samples as required by subsection (6) of WAC 246- 290-300. This includes sample collection during normal operating conditions within the distribution system either at the same time and location as routine or repeat coliform sampling takes place or at a daily recurrence (whichever is greater). 3. Perform disinfectant residual monitoring throughout the distribution system in accordance with subsection (6) of WAC 246-290-300 and as required under WAC 246-290-451. As a minimum, the residual disinfectant concentration within the distribution system shall be measured at the same time and location that a routine or repeat coliform sample is collected or daily, whichever is greater. 4. Perform lead and copper monitoring in accordance with subsection (5) of WAC 246- 290-300 and as required under 40 C.F.R. 141.86 (a) — (f), 141.87, and 141.88. 15-1662 Page 6-3 JLFPacket Pg. 83 8.A.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 6 1 WATER SOURCE AND QUALITY If unsatisfactory samples from the above monitoring are detected, the City must follow the procedures in WAC 246-290-320 for repeat sampling, DOH notification, and customer notification. The City documents the results of water quality testing and summarizes the results in an annual report to customers in compliance with the Consumer Confidence Report requirements that have been in effect since 1998. A copy of the City's latest annual water quality report is included in Appendix J. Monitoring Status The City is in compliance with all water quality monitoring requirements. A summary of the City's compliance status for the monitoring requirements identified above is presented below. Coliform Monitoring The City collects a minimum of 30 samples each month from different locations throughout the distribution system and submits the samples to a certified laboratory for coliform testing, as shown in the Coliform Monitoring Plan in Appendix K. All coliform monitoring results for the years 2002 through 2015 were satisfactory for the presence of coliforms except for two samples collected in 2010, one sample in 2011, and one sample in 2015. Subsequent repeat sampling for all of these had satisfactory results. Disinfection Byproduct Monitoring Since the implementation of the Stage 2 Disinfection Byproducts Rule (DBPR) in 2006, the City has been required to perform additional monitoring and reporting of disinfectant byproducts in the distribution system. The Stage 2 DBPR focuses on monitoring and reducing concentrations of two classes of disinfection byproducts, consisting of Total Trihalomethanes (TTHM) and five Haloacetic Acids (HAA5). The Stage 2 DBPR requires water systems to determine locations within the distribution system with the highest averages of TTHM and HAA5. The City prepared a Standard Monitoring Plan as part of the Initial Distribution System Evaluation (IDSE) that outlined the City's approach for collecting one year of TTHM and HAA5 data at a specified frequency and at locations to characterize these contaminants levels in the system. The City has completed sampling under this plan and submitted its IDSE Report for Standard Monitoring on December 23, 2008. Monitoring under the Stage 2 DBPR has been conducted quarterly in accordance with the City's Standard Monitoring Plan. Compliance with the Stage 2 DBPR is achieved if the locational running annual average 15-1662 Page 6-4 JLFPacket Pg. 84 8.A.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 6 1 WATER SOURCE AND QUALITY (LRAA) at each monitoring location for the four most recent quarters is less than or equal to 80 ppb (parts per billion) for TTHM and less than or equal to 60 ppb for HAA5. The results of TTHM and HAA5 monitoring in 2015 indicated compliance for TTHM with quarterly averages ranging from 41.6 to 58.1 ppb and an annual running average of 46.9 ppb and for HAA5 with quarterly averages ranging from 24.1 to 36.2 ppb and an annual running average of 29.5 ppb. Residual Disinfectant Concentration Monitoring In accordance with WAC 246-290-662, the minimum residual disinfectant concentration entering the distribution system shall be at least 0.2 mg/L. Samples taken within the distribution system are required to have a residual disinfectant concentration that is detectable in at least 95 percent of the samples taken each calendar month. The results of the residual disinfectant concentration monitoring must be reported to DOH using DOH approved forms within ten days after the end of each month, unless otherwise directed by DOH. The samples collected from the City's distribution system for coliform monitoring are also analyzed for residual disinfectant concentration. Chlorine residual varies throughout the distribution system, but is typically between 0.4 and 0.9 mg/L. Lead and Copper Monitoring The Lead and Copper Rule identifies "action levels" for both lead and copper. The action levels for lead and copper are greater than 0.015 mg/L and 1.3 mg/L, respectively. If the 90th percentile concentration of either lead or copper from the group of samples exceeds these action levels, a corrosion control study must be undertaken to evaluate strategies and make recommendations for reducing the lead or copper concentration to below the action levels. Both federal and state regulations require monitoring for lead and copper every three years. The City participates in the City of Everett regional lead and copper monitoring program. This program involves the collection of samples by the City of Everett for all water systems that use Everett water. Most recently, the City of Everett obtained samples from locations throughout the Edmonds water service area in 2015. The results of past lead and copper monitoring within the City's water system indicated the following lead and copper concentration levels: • Lead 0 2000: 0.001 mg/L to 0.006 mg/L (all below action levels) 0 2003: 0.001 mg/L to 0.044 mg/L (one sample exceeding action levels) 15-1662 Page 6-5 JLFPacket Pg. 85 8.A.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 6 1 WATER SOURCE AND QUALITY 0 2006: less than or equal to 0.002 mg/L (all below action levels) 0 2009: 0.0005 mg/L to 0.0032 mg/L (all below action levels) 0 2012: 0.0005 mg/L to 0.0023 mg/L (all below action levels) 0 2015: 0.0005 mg/L to 0.0027 mg/L (all below action levels) • Copper 0 2000: 0.005 mg/L to 0.107 mg/L (all below action levels) 0 2003: 0.004 mg/L to 0.152 mg/L (all below action levels) 0 2006: 0.020 mg/L to 0.076 mg/L (all below action levels) 0 2009: 0.015 mg/L to 0.173 mg/L (all below action levels) 0 2012: 0.0195 mg/L to 0.132 mg/L (all below action levels) 0 2015: 0.0120 mg/L to 0.2230 mg/L (all below action levels) 15-1662 Page 6-6 Jf Packet Pg. 86 8.A.a CHAPTER 7 1 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE Introduction This chapter summarizes the operations and maintenance activities of the City of Edmonds' (City's) Water Division, including a brief description of the personnel and their duties for operating and maintaining the water system. Water System Management and Personnel Management Structure The City's Water Division functions under the direction of the Public Works Director. The Water and Sewer Manager is responsible for management of the water system and reports to the Public Works Director. The daily operation of the water system functions under the direction of the Water Division Lead. The Water Division Lead and the Water Quality Technician reports to the Water and Sewer Manager and the Water Maintenance Workers and Meter Reader report to the Water Division Lead, as shown in Table 7-1. The Water Maintenance Staff are responsible for the daily operation and maintenance of the water system. Their tasks include routine operation and preventive maintenance, record keeping, inspection, testing, installation, and repair of system facilities, and maintenance required in response to emergencies. The City's water system must be operated by one or more certified operators in accordance with Washington State Law (WAC 246-292). In addition, specialty certification is required for backflow device testing. Table 7-2 shows the current certifications of the City's water operations and maintenance staff. Several certified crew members in the Sewer Division also assist the Water Division staff on an as -needed basis. The City maintains well qualified, technically trained staff and provides opportunities for ongoing training, certification, and membership in professional organizations. Personnel Responsibilities The key responsibilities of the water operations and maintenance staff are summarized below: • Public Works & Utilities Director: Manages administration, budget formulation, and utility rates. 15-1662 Page 7-1 JLFPacket Pg. 87 of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water Svstem Plan CHAPTER 7 1 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE 8.A.a • Water/Sewer Manager: Responsible for the operation of the water and sewer utility systems. Supervises the implementation of programs, and oversees the budgeting process for water system operations and maintenance. • Water Lead Worker: Supervises all maintenance personnel in the Water Division. Supports the Water/Sewer Manager in the day-to-day operation of the water system. Coordinates preventative maintenance, daily operation, and repair. • Water Quality Technician: Responsible for all tasks related to maintaining and testing water quality and cross connection control throughout the distribution system and responds to water quality complaints. • Water Maintenance Workers: Directly involved in maintenance of the water system, monitoring of facilities, daily operations, inspection and repair, testing, response to complaints, and emergency response. • Water Meter Reader: Responsible for reading all customer meters, recording the data, and performing water meter maintenance. Table 7-1 Water System Operations and Maintenance Organization Chart Water Quality Technician Jeff Kobylk Public Works & Utilities Director Phil Williams Water/Sewer Manager Jim Waite Water Division Lead Kris Kuhnhausen Water Meter Reader Steve Leonard Water Maintenance Rick Shore Vincent Smith Jason Daniels Pat Rochford 15-1662 Page 7-2 J Packet Pg. 88 8.A.a of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water Svstem Plan CHAPTER 7 1 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE Table 7-2 Personnel Certification Name Position CertNocation Certification Type Jim Waite Water/Sewer Manager 3763 WDM4, WDS, CCS, BAT, WTPOIT Kris Water Division Lead 5199 WDM3, WDS, CCS Kuhnhausen Jeff Kobylk Water Quality 11735 CCS, BAT, WDS Technician Rick Shore Senior Water 5441 WDM1, WDS, CCS Maintenance Vincent Smith Senior Water 6887 WDS, CCS Maintenance Jason Daniels Senior Water 8002 WDS Maintenance Patrick Senior Water Rochford Maintenance 13326 WDS Steve Leonard Meter Reader Certification Definitions WDM - Water Distribution Manager WDS - Water Distribution Specialist CCS - Cross Connection Control Specialist BAT - Backflow Assembly Tester WTPOIT - Water Treatment Plant Operator in Training Normal Operations Available Equipment The City owns and regularly uses a variety of equipment for daily routine operation and maintenance of the water system. The equipment and supplies needed for normal operation and maintenance of the water system is stored at the City's Public Works Facility. The City will also rent additional equipment, as needed, or contract with a local contractor for additional services. The following equipment and supplies are maintained by the City: 0 Repair bands, couplings, and replacement pipe for all sizes and types of water mains found in the system to be used for the repair or replacement of leaking or broken water mains. 15-1662 Page 7-3 1LFPacket Pg. 89 8.A.a of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water Svstem Plan CHAPTER 7 1 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE • Spare service saddles, corporation stops, service lines, meter setters, meters and boxes to be used for the repair of service connections from leaks or accidental damage. • A complete hydrant assembly to be used for the repair or replacement of a leaking or damaged hydrant. • Spare parts for facilities found in the distribution system, including gate valves, pressure reducing valves, air release valves, and fire hydrants. • An adequate supply of dry chlorine is kept on hand. Chlorine is the only treatment chemical kept in stock. • Vehicles that include three crew trucks, two dump trucks, one flatbed truck, one meter reading vehicle, one vactor truck, and one backhoe. All vehicles are equipped with communications equipment to ensure a reliable method of communication within the organization. Routine Operations Routine operations involve the planning, coordination, and implementation of proper procedures to ensure that the water system is functioning properly and providing reliable, high - quality water to all customers at all times. Routine operations also involve planned maintenance activities and reading of customer meters. Routine Water Quality Sampling The City routinely samples water throughout the distribution system to ensure the water is safe for its customers' use, as required by law. The Department of Health (DOH) has adopted federal regulations that specify minimum sampling requirements for water systems. The sampling requirements are contained in WA 246-290-300 and depend on the population served, source type, and treatment provided. Water quality monitoring is discussed further in Chapter 6, the City's latest Water Quality Report in Appendix J, and the City's Coliform Monitoring Plan in Appendix K. Cross -Connection Control The City adopted a cross -connection control program that complies with WAC 246-290-490 for the protection of its potable water from contamination due to cross connections. Backflow prevention devices are required at any service connection where a potential for contamination exists, as defined by City ordinance (Edmonds City Code, Chapter 7.20 Backflow Prevention). The premise where the backflow prevention device is installed is placed on a yearly inspection list that is maintained by the Water Division. 15-1662 Page 7-4 JLFPacket Pg. 90 8.A.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 7 1 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE The City routinely reviews building permit applications for potential cross connection situations. Several Water Division staff have the Cross Connection Specialist certification as shown in Table 7-2 and are capable of implementing the cross connection control program. Information from the City's cross connection control program is contained in Appendix H. Customer Complaint Response Program The City maintains a log of complaints received from water customers. Depending on the nature of the complaint, a Water Division employee may be contacted by radio or mobile phone to respond immediately if a public health issue is apparent. If not of immediate urgency, a work order will be completed and staff will respond as soon as feasible. The City dedicates one full-time employee to distribution system water quality. One of the responsibilities of this position is to address water quality complaints and inquiries. A computerized maintenance management system is used to document and track this activity. Recordkeeping & Reporting Regulations for recordkeeping and reporting are contained in WAC 246-290-480. The City maintains all records in its Information and Management System (IMS). All water system operating records are kept for an indefinite period. Records and reports maintained by the City include, but are not limited to, the following: • Water quality monitoring • Water quality complaints • Actions taken to correct Maximum Containment Level (MCL) violations • Variances or exemptions • Public notifications • Flushing activities • Backflow prevention devices and customer notices • Maintenance and construction records • System charts and drawings • O&M manuals • Personnel and legal records The required retention periods of critical records required by DOH in accordance with WAC 246-290-480 are as follows: • Bacteriological analyses results: 5 years. Chemical analysis (IOC, VOC, SOC, etc.) results: For as long as the system is in operation. 15-1662 Page 7-5 JLFPacket Pg. 91 8.A.a of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water Svstem Plan CHAPTER 7 1 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE • Copies of monitoring plans: As long as the corresponding monitoring occurs. Keep replaced plans 5 years for microbial and turbidity analysis and 10 years for chemical analyses. • Records of action taken by the system to correct violations: 10 years after the last action taken for that violation. • Records of sanitary surveys: 10 years. • Records concerning a variance or exemption granted to the system: 5 years once the variance or exemption expires. • Public notices: 3 years after issued. • Consumer Confidence Reports: 3 years. • Lead/Copper sampling data and analyses, reports, surveys, letters, evaluations, and schedules: 12 years. • Daily source meter readings: 10 years. • Other records of operation and analyses as may be required by DOH: 3 years. • Project reports, construction documents and drawings, inspection reports, and approvals life of the facility. The notification and reporting requirements of DOH are as follows: • The City must report the following to DOH: o Within one business day: a backflow incident per WAC 246-290-490 (8)f. o Within 48 hours: a failure to comply with the primary standards or treatment technique requirements specified in WAC 246-290. o Within 48 hours: a failure to comply with the monitoring requirements specified in WA 246-290. o Within 48 hours: a violation of a primary maximum contaminant level (MCL). • The City must submit to DOH all applicable reports required by WAC 246-290. Monthly reports are due by the 1 Oth day of the following month, unless otherwise specified. • Daily source meter readings and total annual source meter readings must be made available to DOH on request. 15-1662 Page 7-6 JLFPacket Pg. 92 8.A.a of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 7 1 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE • Water facilities inventory form (WFI) must be submitted to DOH within 30 days of any change in name, category, ownership, or responsibility for management of the water system. • The City must notify DOH of the presence of o Coliform in a sample within 10 days of notification by the testing laboratory. o Fecal coliform or E. coli in a sample by the end of the business day that the City is notified by the testing laboratory. • When a coliform MCL violation is determined, the City must: o Notify DOH within 24 hours of determining acute coliform MCL violations. o Notify DOH before the end of the next business day when a non -acute coliform MCL is determined. o Notify water customers in accordance with WAC 246-290 Part 7, Subpart A • Any reports or communications related to monitoring waivers must be submitted to DOH during each monitoring period or as required. Public Notification In accordance with WAC 246-290 Part 7, Subpart A, the City must notify water system customers if any of the following conditions occur: • Failure to comply with monitoring requirements under WAC 246-290. • Failure to comply with a primary MCL described under WAC 246-290-310. • Failure to comply with a surface water treatment technique. • Failure to comply with testing requirements. • Failure to comply with a DOH order. • Failure to comply with a variance or exemption schedule from DOH. • If the system is operating under a variance or exemption. • If system is identified as a source of waterborne disease outbreak. • If DOH issues the system a category red operating permit. • If DOH issues an order. The City will comply with public notification content requirements, notice distribution requirements, and time limit requirements specified in WAC 246-290 Part 7, Subpart A. More information on the City's public notification procedures is contained in the Coliform Monitoring Plan in Appendix K. 15-1662 Page 7-7 JLFPacket Pg. 93 8.A.a of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water Svstem Plan CHAPTER 7 1 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE Safety Procedures and Equipment The City provides ongoing safety training for its staff to ensure a safe working environment. The American Water Works Association publishes a manual, entitled Safety Practices for Water Utilities (M3), describing safety programs and providing guidelines for safe work practices and techniques for a variety of water utility work situations. The City has implemented several safety rules related, but not limited to, the following: • Climbing water reservoirs (tanks or standpipes). • Traffic Control Flagger Certification • Forklift Operation • Confined Space Entry All employees in the Water Division have basic first aid training. All Water Division vehicles are equipped with first aid kits. First aid kits are also maintained at the Public Works Facility. A copy of Safety Data Sheets (SDS) for the chemicals used in the operations and maintenance of the water system are kept on file at the Public Works Department. The data sheets identify the chemical name, hazardous ingredients, physical data, fire and explosion hazard data, health hazards, spill and disposal procedures, user protection information, handling and storage precautions, as well as other information about the product. Emergency Operations The Water Division staff are trained and equipped to respond to emergency events. The water system has been designed and constructed to operate under emergency conditions. A brief discussion of the capabilities of the water system infrastructure and its operation during emergency events follows. Multiple Supply Sources The City has the capability to maintain water service to its customers if its primary supply facility, the Alderwood Supply Station, is out of service. The City's standby supply facility, the Seattle Public Utilities Supply Station, could be used to supply the system during an emergency event. The City also has multiple emergency interties with adjacent water systems that could be used during this type of event. The City has five emergency interties with the City of Lynnwood and six emergency interties with the Olympic View Water & Wastewater District. Multiple Reservoirs The City has multiple reservoirs that provide redundancy to the operating areas they serve, should one of the reservoirs be out of service. The reservoirs include a 3.0 MG steel reservoir 15-1662 Page 7-8 JLFPacket Pg. 94 8.A.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 7 1 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE and 1.5 MG steel reservoir at the Five Corners site, a 1.5 MG buried concrete reservoir at the Yost Park site, and a 1.5 MG buried concrete reservoir at the Seaview Park site. Distribution System The City has installed water mains with multiple connections to other water mains and created looped water mains where possible. This looped configuration enables the City to maintain service to customers and minimize the number of customers taken out service during maintenance and repairs to the distribution system. Emergency Telephone Calls Emergency calls during business hours are handled through the City switchboard. Calls during non -business hours are handled through the Snohomish County Emergency Communication System (Sno-Com). One Water Division employee is on -call 24-hours a day. On -Call Personnel The City's "on -call' person is equipped with a phone, an iPad, and responds with a service vehicle. This allows a prompt response to any emergency calls. A list of emergency telephone numbers is provided to each "on -call' employee. Employee Cross -Training The City's public works operations and maintenance employees are trained in all areas of the City -owned utilities. This enables the City to draw from a larger pool of workers that are qualified to deal with water related issues in the event of an emergency. This places the City in a position of readiness where they are able to effectively deal with almost any problem that arises. Emergency Response Program The City of Edmonds Disaster Plan prepared by the City identifies procedures that would be carried out in the event of a serious emergency or disaster situation. The City has also prepared an Emergency Response Plan and a Vulnerability Assessment Plan of the water system, which includes contingency plans for responding to potential emergency conditions. Copies of these are kept on file at the Public Works Facility. 15-1662 Page 7-9 J Packet Pg. 95 8.A.a of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water Svstem Plan CHAPTER 7 1 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE Preventive Maintenance The Water Division has developed a preventive maintenance program to ensure all critical components of the water system are properly functioning and regularly maintained for long- term performance and reliability. The schedule in Table 8-2 is followed for preventive maintenance of the City's water system. Table 7-3 Preventive Maintenance Schedule Infrastructure Frequency Maintenance Description Daily Inspect facility, site and security wally Inspect, clean, and maintain all equipment Pump Station Every 5 Rebuild control valves Years Daily Inspect facility, site and security wally Inspect exterior coating Reservoirs Every 5 Years Clean & inspect interiors Supply Annually Inspect, clean, and maintain all equipment Stations Every 5years Rebuild control valves Fire Hydrants Annually Operate/flush, inspect, clean, & maintain Annually Exercise, inspect, clean, & maintain all PRV Stations equipment Every 5 Rebuild control valves Years Valves Annually Operate, inspect, clean, & maintain Semi- Flush water mains using fire hydrants & Water Mains wally blow -off assemblies to discharge flushing water Staffing The Water Division is currently staffed with several full-time personnel consisting of water maintenance workers, a water quality technician, a meter reader, and a water maintenance lead worker. The Water and Sewer Manager allocates approximately 50 percent of their time to the Water Division. The Public Works Director oversees all Public Works activities, so a much smaller portion of their time is available to the water system. 15-1662 Page 7-10 JLFPacket Pg. 96 8.A.a of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water Svstem Plan CHAPTER 7 1 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE The Water Division is currently staffed with seven full-time personnel consisting of four field technicians, one water quality technician, one meter reader, and one lead supervisor. The Water and Sewer Manager and Public Works Director both allocate a portion of their time to the Water Division as well. The Water Division has been able to operate the water system and meet past regulatory requirements for public water systems. However, the increasing needs of the water system, combined with the additional demands of now having a consistent waterline replacement program and additional needs due to regulatory requirements, has created more challenges in completing planned preventive maintenance activities. Therefore, the City's Water Maintenance and Operations Division is planning to add at least one additional staff member in the near future to ensure continued compliance with regulatory requirements and the increasing needs of the system. 15-1662 Page 7-11 JLFPacket Pg. 97 8.A.a Q Packet Pg. 98 8.A.a CHAPTER 8 1 WATER SYSTEM ANALYSIS Introduction This chapter presents the analysis of the City of Edmonds' (City) existing water system. Individual water system components were analyzed under both existing and future water demand conditions to determine their ability to meet policies and design criteria. The City's water demands are presented in Chapter 4 and the City's policies and design criteria are presented in Chapter 5. A description of the water system facilities and their current operation is presented in Chapter 2. The last section of this chapter presents the existing system capacity analysis that aided in the determination of the maximum number of equivalent residential units (ERUs) that can be served by the City's water system. Planned water system capital improvements that resolve the deficiencies identified in this chapter are presented in Chapter 9. Pressure Zones Table 8-1 lists each of the City's seven pressure zones, the highest and lowest elevation served in each zone, and the minimum and maximum distribution system pressures within each zone, based on maximum static water conditions (full reservoirs and no system demands). This table shows that the City is currently providing water at sufficient pressures throughout the system, with the highest pressures occurring at the lowest elevations of each pressure zone. All new water services with pressures exceeding 80 psi must have individual pressure reducing valves to reduce the pressure to 80 psi or less, in accordance with the plumbing code. Table 8-1 Minimum and Maximum Distribution System Pressures Pressure Highest Elevation Served Static Pressure at Highest Elevation Lowest Elevation Served Static Pressure at Lowest Elevation Zone (ft) (psi) (ft) (psi) 596 455 61 270 141 505 365 61 195 134 500 400 43 180 139 486 375 48 170 137 425 285 61 175 108 420 250 74 155 115 325 245 35 10 137 Future 325 1 207 1 51 1 10 1 137 15-1662 Page 8-1 JLFPacket Pg. 99 8.A.a of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water Svstem Plan CHAPTER 8 1 WATER SYSTEM ANALYSIS It is the City's policy to provide water service at a minimum pressure of 40 psi, which has generally been accomplished with the design of the system and location of pressure zone boundaries. Due to the challenging topography throughout the system, high pressures do occur in several areas of the service area. As shown in Table 8-1, the highest elevation served in the 325 Zone will change in the future through a pressure zone conversion project, described in Chapter 9, that converts an area of the 325 Zone to the 486 Zone. Alderwood Supply Station This section evaluates the City's Alderwood Supply Station to determine if it has sufficient capacity to provide water supply to the system at a rate that meets the existing and future demands of the system. In the past, the City operated its water system as two independent service areas. This was based on the north service area being supplied with water from Alderwood Water & Wastewater District (AWWD) and the south service area being supplied with water from Seattle Public Utilities (SPU). The City now operates the system as one service area completely supplied with water from AWWD, due to the rising cost of water purchased from SPU. The City's SPU Supply Station remains in service but operates in a standby mode, providing additional supply to the system only when needed. All water is supplied through the City's Alderwood Supply Station. Analysis Criteria Supply facilities must provide a reliable and sufficient quantity of water at pressures meeting the requirements of WAC 246-290-230. The capacity of supply facilities in a pressure zone with adequate storage must be sufficient to provide water at a rate that is equal to or greater than the peak day demand of the zone being served. This approach assumes that demands in excess of the peak day demand will be supplied from the equalizing storage portion of reservoirs. Since the City's Alderwood Supply Station provides supply to pressure zones that can also be supplied from storage for intraday peak demands, the supply requirement for the supply station is equal to the peak day demand of the system. Analysis Results The Alderwood Supply Station delivers water to the City's entire water system and is supplied directly into the 596 Zone, meeting customer demands and filling the two reservoirs at the Five Corners site. Water is supplied to the remaining lower pressure zones from the 596 Zone through multiple pressure reducing valve (PRV) stations. Table 8-2 summarizes the evaluation of the City's Alderwood Supply Station to determine if it has sufficient capacity to meet the existing and future demands of the system. The existing system and future system evaluations are based on the existing facility, which has a maximum supply capacity of approximately 7,000 gpm. The capacity of the existing facility 15-1662 Page 8-2 J Packet Pg. 100 8.A.a of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water Svstem Plan CHAPTER 8 1 WATER SYSTEM ANALYSIS was increased after completion of improvements in 2010, that enables flow through both the mainline and bypass portions of the station. The results of the evaluation, as shown in Table 8-2, indicate the City's Alderwood Supply Station has sufficient capacity to meet the existing and future supply requirements of the system through the year 2034. Table 8-2 Alderwood Supply Station Capacity Evaluation Description Existing System Year 2014 Future System Year 2034 (gpm) (gpm) Required Supply Capacity Peak Day Demand (PDD) 1 4,052 4,611 Available Supply Capacity Alderwood Supply Station 1 7,000 7,000 Surplus Supply Capacity Surplus Capacity 1 2,948 2,389 Five Corners Pump Station This section evaluates the Five Corners Pump Station to determine if it has sufficient capacity to meet the existing and future demands of the system. Analysis Criteria The primary purpose of the pump station is to pump stored water from the Five Corners 3.0 MG Reservoir to the 596 Zone to supplement the Alderwood Supply Station supply during peak demand periods, to provide supplemental fire flow, and to provide emergency supply. This is accomplished by using standby storage from the Five Corners 3.0 MG Reservoir should the Alderwood Supply Station be out of service. The criteria for evaluating the capacity of the Five Corners Pump Station is based on the most stringent condition in which the system simultaneously experiences peak hour demands and a fire flow in the 596 Zone. This fire flow is based on the largest requirement of 5,000 gpm. Supply to the system during this condition is provided by the Alderwood Supply Station, Five Corners Pump Station, and SPU Supply Station, which is configured to automatically activate during this type of an event. The analysis is based on the pump station with improvements that were completed in 2010 and control improvements that were implemented in 2016. 15-1662 Page 8-3 J Packet Pg. 101 8.A.a of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water Svstem Plan CHAPTER 8 1 WATER SYSTEM ANALYSIS Analysis Results The results of the evaluation, as shown in Table 8-3, indicate the Five Corners Pump Station has sufficient capacity to serve its purpose in providing supplemental supply to the system, based on both the existing and future supply requirements of the system. As shown in Table 8-3, the required supply from the Five Corners Pump Station increases to 800 gpm in the future (2034) due to increased demands. Table 8-3 Five Corners Pump Station Capacity Evaluation Description Kk Existing System Year 2014 Future System Year 2034 Required Supply (gpm) System Peak Hour Demand (PHD) 7,294 8,300 Maximum Fire Flow Requirement 5,000 5,000 Total Required Supply 12,294 13,300 Available Supply (gpm) Alderwood Supply Station Capacity 7,000 7,000 SPU Supply Station Capacity 5,500 5,500 Total Supply Capacity 12,500 12,500 Required Supply from Five Corners Pump Station (gpm) Required Supply from Pump Station 0 800 Available Supply from Five Corners Pump Station (gpm) Five Corners Pump Station Capacity 2,400 2,400 Surplus Pump Station Capacity (gpm) Surplus Pump Station Capacity 2,400 1,600 Storage Facilities This section evaluates whether the City's four existing water storage facilities have sufficient capacity to meet the existing and future storage requirements of the system. Analysis Criteria Water storage is provided in a public water system to achieve multiple purposes and can be represented by the following components: operational storage, equalizing storage, standby storage, fire flow storage, and dead storage. The following subsections provide a description of each storage component and the criteria used to evaluate the capacity of the City's storage facilities. 15-1662 Page 8-4 J Packet Pg. 102 8.A.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 8 1 WATER SYSTEM ANALYSIS Operational Storage Operational storage is the upper portion of the reservoir that is used to supply the water system under normal demand conditions. Operational storage is the average amount of draw down in the reservoir during normal operating conditions, which represents a volume of storage that will most likely not be available for other purposes. The operational storage in all four of the City's reservoirs is the volume of storage between the average water level of the reservoirs and the maximum water level (i.e., overflow elevation) of the reservoirs. Equalizing Storage Equalizing storage is the portion of the reservoir, below operational storage, that is used to supply the water system under peak demand conditions when the system demand exceeds the total rate of supply of the sources. The criteria for determining the equalizing storage requirements for the City's system, which is supplied continuously from the Alderwood Supply Station, is based on the Department of Health (DOH) formula that considers the difference between peak hour demand and supply capacity over the course of 150 minutes. Standby Storage Standby storage is the portion of the reservoir used to supply the water system under emergency conditions when supply facilities are out of service. Considering the City's historically reliable supply from AW", standby supply from SPU, and 11 emergency interties with two adjacent water systems, the need for a large amount of standby storage is not warranted. Therefore, the standby storage requirement is based on a sufficient volume to provide all water supply to the system for one day during an average day demand condition when the Alderwood Supply Station is out of service and no other supply is provided by other facilities. Fire Flow Storage Fire flow storage is the portion of the reservoir with sufficient volume to supply water to the system at the maximum rate and duration required to extinguish a fire at the building with the highest fire flow requirement. The magnitude of the fire flow storage is the product of the fire flow rate and duration of the system's maximum fire flow requirement. Fire flow requirements differ for the 325 Pressure Zone, versus the rest of the system. The required volume of fire flow storage for the 325 Zone is based on a 3,000 gpm fire flow for a 3-hour duration. The required volume of fire flow storage for the remaining pressure zones is based on a 5,000 gpm fire flow for a 4-hour duration. Both standby storage and fire flow storage are considered emergency storage components and can be nested, as approved by local fire protection authorities. The City has elected to nest these two storage components, which results in the larger of the two individual components being used for both standby and fire flow purposes. 15-1662 Page 8-5 J Packet Pg. 103 8.A.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 8 1 WATER SYSTEM ANALYSIS Dead Storage Dead storage is the bottom portion of the reservoir that cannot be used because water is stored at an elevation that is too low to either pump or flow by gravity to provide sufficient pressure. This unusable storage occupies the lower portion of most ground -level standpipe style reservoirs. Analysis Approach The storage analysis is based on an evaluation of the existing reservoirs providing water to the two operating areas that they serve. The Five Corners 3.0 MG Reservoir and 1.5 MG Reservoir provide storage to an operating area that includes all pressure zones, except for the 325 Zone. The 1.5 MG Yost Reservoir and 1.5 MG Seaview Reservoir provide storage for the 325 Zone. Existing Storage Analysis Results The results of the storage analysis for the existing system indicate that the existing storage facilities have sufficient capacity to meet existing demands, as shown in Table 8-4. The two Five Corners reservoirs have approximately 0.52 MG of excess storage for the pressure zones that they serve (all pressure zones except the 325 pressure zone). The Yost Reservoir and Seaview Reservoir have approximately 0.71 MG of excess storage for the 325 Zone. This results in a total, system -wide surplus storage of 1.22 MG for the existing capacity. Table 8-4 Existing Storage Capacity Evaluation Description All Zones except 325 Zone (MG) 325 Zone (MG) Total System (MG) Usable Storage (MG) Maximum Storage Capacity 3.90 3.00 6.90 Dead (Non -usable) Storage -0.36 0.00 -0.36 Total Usable Storage 3.54 3.00 6.54 Required Storage (MG) Operational Storage 1.01 1.34 2.35 Equalizing Storage 0.03 0.01 0.04 Standby & Fire Flow Storage* 1.98 0.94 2.92 Total Required Storage 3.02 2.29 5.32 Surplus Storage 0.52 0.71 1.22 General Note: Standby storage is larger than fire flow storage requirements, based on one day of storage for 201 gallons per day per ER U. 15-1662 Page 8-6 J Packet Pg. 104 8.A.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 8 1 WATER SYSTEM ANALYSIS Future Storage Analysis Results The future storage analysis was performed to determine the adequacy of the City's existing reservoirs to meet the future storage requirements, based on projected demands for the year 2034. The demands used in this analysis are projected demands without reductions from conservation efforts. The results of the future storage analysis indicate that the existing storage facilities have sufficient capacity to meet the future demands of the system in 2034, as shown in Table 8-5. Therefore, additional storage capacity is not required within the 20-year planning period. Under future conditions, a total, system -wide surplus storage of 0.67 MG is allotted. A number of improvements to the existing reservoirs, not related to capacity, are planned by the City and identified in Chapter 9. Table 8-5 Future Storage Capacity Evaluation Description All Zones except 325 Zone (MG) 325 Zone (MG) Total System (MG) Usable Storage (MG) Maximum Storage Capacity 3.90 3.00 6.90 Dead (Non -usable) Storage -0.36 0.00 -0.36 Total Usable Storage 3.54 3.00 6.54 Required Storage (MG) Operational Storage 1.01 1.34 2.35 Equalizing Storage 0.13 0.06 0.20 Standby & Fire Flow Storage* 2.25 1.07 3.32 Total Required Storage 3.40 2.47 5.87 Surplus Storage 0.14 0.53 0.67 General Note: Standby storage is larger than fire flow storage requirements, based on one day of storage for 201 gallons per day per ER U. Distribution and Transmission System This section evaluates the City's existing distribution and transmission water mains to determine if they are sized and looped adequately to provide the necessary flow rates and pressures to meet the existing and future requirements of the system. Analysis Criteria The criteria used to evaluate the City's distribution and transmission system is contained in WAC 246-290-230. The pressure analysis criteria states that the distribution system "shall be designed with the capacity to deliver the design peak hour demand quantity of water at 30 psi 15-1662 Page 8-7 J Packet Pg. 105 8.A.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 8 1 WATER SYSTEM ANALYSIS under peak hour demand flow conditions measured at all existing and proposed service water meters or along property lines adjacent to mains if no meter exists, and under the condition where all equalizing storage has been depleted." It also states that if fire flow is to be provided, then "the distribution system shall also provide maximum day demand (MDD) plus the required fire flow at a pressure of at least 20 psi at all points throughout the distribution system, and under the condition where the designed volume of fire suppression and equalizing storage has been depleted." Hydraulic Model A hydraulic computer model of the City's water system was used to evaluate the existing system and identify proposed improvements to resolve deficiencies. The hydraulic model was also used to demonstrate that the proposed improvements will eliminate the identified deficiencies and meet the future demand requirements. A description of the hydraulic model and settings used for the analyses follows. Description The City's existing water system was modeled with the Innovyze InfoWater' software (version 12.3, Update #3). InfoWater' is a GIS-based modeling program that uses the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) software, EPANET, as its analysis engine. EPANET is a widely accepted program for the purposes of analyzing water distribution piping systems. All existing facilities and water mains in the City's water system were modeled, including recent improvements. Demand Data The hydraulic model contains average day demands of the existing system, based on 2014 demand data. A global demand factor was used to adjust the demands to reflect future 2034 demand levels. Demand peaking factors from Chapter 4 were used to adjust demand levels to peak day demand for the fire flow analyses and peak hour demand for the pressure analysis. Facility Data The hydraulic model of the existing system for the pressure analysis contains all active existing system facilities with settings that correspond to peak hour demand events. The Alderwood Supply Station was operating in pressure control mode to maintain pressures in the 596 Zone. The Five Corners Pump Station was modeled to reflect the recent pump station improvements. The reservoirs were modeled with water levels that reflect full utilization of operational and equalizing storage. All active pressure reducing stations were modeled as being in service and at their normal set points. 15-1662 Page 8-8 J Packet Pg. 106 8.A.a of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water Svstem Plan CHAPTER 8 1 WATER SYSTEM ANALYSIS The hydraulic model of the existing system for the fire flow analyses contains all active existing system facilities with settings that correspond to peak day demand events. The Alderwood Supply Station was set up to operate in pressure control mode to maintain pressures in the 596 Zone. The Five Corners Pump Station was modeled to operate under pressure control, based on inflow from the Alderwood Supply Station and system pressures. The reservoirs were modeled with water levels that reflect full utilization of operational, equalizing, and fire flow storage. The depletion of fire flow storage for the analyses in all pressure zones, except the 325 Zone, was based on a maximum fire now requirement of 5,000 gpm for a 4-hour duration. The depletion of fire flow storage for the analyses in the 325 Zone was based on a maximum fire flow requirement of 3,000 gpm for a 3-hour duration. All active pressure reducing stations were modeled as being in service and at their normal set points. The hydraulic model representing the proposed system in the year 2034 contains all active existing system facilities and planned system improvements that are identified in Chapter 9. The settings for all active existing and proposed facilities were set to correspond to the future peak day demand events for the fire flow analysis of the proposed water system. Otherwise, facility settings were the same as in the existing system analyses. Calibration Hydraulic model calibration is the process of using field pressure and flow data to improve the accuracy of the hydraulic model so that it can be used to accurately simulate operation of the actual water system. Initial calibration was accomplished by adjusting water main roughness coefficients based on a compilation of pipe material and year data. Additional calibration of the model was achieved using the most recent elevation data available for the water system, field flow and pressure data, which was collected from flow tests that the City performed throughout the system. Hydraulic Analyses Results Hydraulic analysis was performed to determine the capability of the system to meet the pressure and flow requirements identified in Chapter 5 and contained in WAC 246-290-230 The first analysis was performed to evaluate pressures throughout the system under existing (i.e., 2014) peak hour demand conditions. The results of this analysis were used to identify locations of low and high pressures. To satisfy the minimum pressure requirements, pressures at all water service locations were required to be at least 30 psi during these demand conditions. The results of this analysis indicated that all areas of the system have pressures greater than 30 psi. Fire flow analyses were performed throughout the system to determine the capability of the existing water system to provide adequate fire flow under peak day demand conditions. A separate fire flow analysis was performed for each node in the hydraulic model to determine the available fire flow at a minimum residual pressure of 20 psi. For each node analyzed, the 15-1662 Page 8-9 J Packet Pg. 107 8.A.a of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water Svstem Plan CHAPTER 8 1 WATER SYSTEM ANALYSIS resulting fire flow was compared to its target fire flow requirement, which was assigned according to the land use classification that it is located within, as summarized in Table 4-9. A summary of the analyses results for representative locations in each pressure zone is shown in Table 8-6. The available fire flow shown in the table represents the flow in the area from a single fire hydrant location. The available fire flow from nearby hydrants, which would also be activated to fight an actual fire, is greater than the amounts shown in the table. Multiple fire hydrants are generally used to extinguish a fire by generating higher flows and simultaneously fighting the fire from multiple locations. The single hydrant modeling approach is used primarily for planning purposes to locate areas in the system that should be improved to ensure sufficient fire flow is available in each area of the system. The results of the fire flow analyses were used to identify improvements for water mains that are currently undersized or not looped adequately to provide sufficient fire flow. Upon completion of the existing system fire flow analyses, proposed water main improvements were included in the model and fire flow analyses were performed throughout the system to demonstrate that the improvements eliminate the existing system deficiencies and meet the future requirements of the system. These analyses were modeled under future year 2034 demand conditions without planned reductions from conservation to ensure that the improvements are sized sufficiently to meet the most stringent requirements anticipated in the future. The results of the fire flow analyses with planned improvements are summarized in Table 8-6. These results highlight that fire flows are significantly increased with the proposed water main improvements. A description of the planned improvements and a figure exhibiting their location is presented in Chapter 9. Table 8-6 shows that some areas are anticipated to have a minor decrease in available fire flows in the future. The increase in residential demands from 2014 to 2034 caused some areas to see a small reduction in available fire flows, but did not create any fire flow deficiencies. 15-1662 Page 8-10 J Packet Pg. 108 8.A.a of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water Svstem Plan CHAPTER 8 1 WATER SYSTEM ANALYSIS Table 8-6 Fire Flow Analysis Summary Available Fire Flow (gpm) at 20 psi Target Existing Future System Description Approximate Location Pressure Zone Fire Flow i System with Improvements 1 (gpm) Swedish Medical 216th St SW & 73rd PI 596 2,661 8,112 5,000 Center W Commercial Area 76th Ave SW 242nd St 596 1,404 4,415 3,000 Multi -Family 196th St SW & 80th Ave Residential / W 596 1,544 3,765 3,000 Condominium Area Single Family 89th PI W, North of 596 392 1 567 1,000 Residential Area 200th St SW ' Multi -Family 83rd Ave W & 596 2,335 4,422 3,000 Residential Area Woodlake Dr Single Family 182nd PI SW, East of 505 392 1,567 1,000 Residential Area 88th Ave W Single Family 90th Ave W, south of 505 881 1,567 1,000 Residential Area 184th St SW Single Family Glen St & IOth Ave N 420 392 2,168 1,000 Residential Area Single Family Excelsior PI & 94th PI 420 881 1,567 1,000 Residential Area Single Family Glen St & 9th Ave N 420 494 2,053 1,000 Residential Area Single Family Main St & Olympic Ave 486 866 1,550 1,000 Residential Area Single Family Main St & 1Oth Ave S 486 873 1,557 1,000 Residential Area Single Family 7th Ave S & Elm PI 486 875 1,560 1,000 Residential Area Single Family Meadowdale Beach Rd 500 866 1,550 1,000 Residential Area & 74th PI W Single Family Meadowdale Beach Rd 500 861 1,544 1,000 Residential Area & 169th PI Single Family Sound View Dr & 176th 425 881 1,567 1,000 Residential Area St SW Single Family Soundview Drive, South 425 881 1,567 1,000 Residential Area of 176th St SW Multi -Family 4th Ave S & Edmonds Residential / Wa y 325 1,567 3,525 3,000 Condominium Area Edmonds Viewland Way & 325 2,313 3,740 3,000 Elementary School Olympic Ave ' Fire flows shown are from a single fire hydrant. Higher flows are commonly available from nearby hydrants Seepage 8-9 for more information. 15-1662 Page 8-11 J Packet Pg. 109 8.A.a of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water Svstem Plan CHAPTER 8 1 WATER SYSTEM ANALYSIS System Capacity System capacity analyses were performed to determine the maximum number of equivalent residential units (ERUs) that the system can serve, based on an independent evaluation of each component of the City's water system. A separate analysis was performed for the existing system with year 2014 demand levels and the future system with year 2034 projected demand levels. The results of these analyses provide the City with information to ensure sufficient capacity is available when reviewing applications for new connections to the water system. Determination of Adequate Water Supply for New Buildings By law, governments cannot issue a building permit until water is available for the applicant's property. The requirement for providing evidence of an adequate water supply was codified in 1990 under Title 19.27.097 of the Revised Code of Washington (RCW) in the Building Code Section. To assist governments with implementing these requirements, the Department of Health has developed a handbook, entitled Guidelines for Determining Water Availability for New Buildings. A public water system will issue a "Certificate of Water Availability," or similar document, during the building permit review process when there is sufficient water supply to meet the domestic water service and the fire flow requirements of the applicant's proposed project. Analysis Criteria The capacity of the City's water system and the ability to serve additional customers is based on the limiting capacity of either supply or storage, whichever is associated with the least ERUs. The analysis of supply was computed from the Alderwood Supply Station capacity and the system's peak day demand per ERU. The analysis of storage was computed from the total usable capacity of the storage facilities and the storage requirement per ERU. The storage requirement per ERU was determined from the existing storage requirement presented in this chapter and the existing ERUs presented in Chapter 4. Existing System Capacity Analysis Results The results of the existing system capacity analysis, as shown in Table 8-7, indicate that the existing system has sufficient capacity to serve an additional 3,393 ERUs. Table 8-7 also shows the storage component is the limiting facility of the system. 15-1662 Page 8-12 J Packet Pg. 110 8.A.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 8 1 WATER SYSTEM ANALYSIS Table 8-7 Existing (2014) System Capacity Analysis Demands Per ERU Basis Average Day Demand Per ERU (gal/day) 201 Peak Day Demand Per ERU (gal/day) 403 Peak Hour Demand Per ERU (gal/day) 725 Supply Capacity Limiting Supply Rate - AWWD Supply Station (gal/day) 10,080,000 Peak Day Demand Per ERU (gal/day) 403 Maximum Supply Capacity (ERUs) 25,043 Storage Capacity Maximum Storage Capacity (gal) 6,540,153 Storage Requirement Per ERU (gal) 361 Maximum Storage Capacity (ERUs) 18,123 Maximum System Capacity Based on Limiting Facility - Storage 18,123 Available System Capacity Maximum System Capacity (ERUs) 18,123 Existing (2014) ERUs 14,729 Available System Capacity (ERUs) 3,393 Future System Capacity Analysis Results The results of the 20-year projected system capacity analysis, as shown in Table 8-8, indicate that the water system in the year 2034 will have sufficient capacity to serve an additional 1,889 ERUs. Again, storage is the limiting facility for the system capacity. 15-1662 Page 8-13 J Packet Pg. 111 8.A.a of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 8 1 WATER SYSTEM ANALYSIS Table 8-8 20-Year (2034) Projected System Capacity Analysis Demands Per ERU Basis Average Day Demand Per ERU (gal/day) 201 Peak Day Demand Per ERU (gal/day) 403 Peak Hour Demand Per ERU (gal/day) 725 Supply Capacity Limiting Supply Rate - AWWD Supply Station (gal/day) 10,080,000 Peak Day Demand Per ERU (gal/day) 403 Maximum Supply Capacity (ERUs) 25,043 Storage Capacity Maximum Storage Capacity (gal) 6,540,153 Storage Requirement Per ERU (gal) 356 Maximum Storage Capacity (ERUs) 18,389 Maximum System Capacity Based on Limiting Facility - Storage 18,389 Available Sys em Capacity Maximum System Capacity (ERUs) 18,389 Projected (2034) ERUs 16,500 Available System Capacity (ERUs) 1,889 15-1662 Page 8-14 J Packet Pg. 112 8.A.a CHAPTER 9 1 WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS Introduction This chapter presents water system improvements that the City of Edmonds (City) plans to implement within the 20-year planning period to resolve existing system deficiencies and meet the future demands of the water system. This chapter also presents criteria used for prioritizing the capital improvements, planning level project cost estimates, and an implementation schedule for the improvements. The water system improvements were identified from the results of the water system analyses, presented in Chapter 8, and have been sized to accommodate the projected demands that were established in Chapter 4. Description of Improvements This section provides a general description of capital improvements that have been completed since the last Comprehensive Water System Plan was prepared in 2010 and provides a brief description of the currently planned capital improvements. The water system improvements are shown schematically in Figure 9-1 and summarized in a table near the end of this chapter. The water system improvements for this Plan are grouped into the following categories, including: • Water Main Improvements • PRV Station and Pressure Relief Improvements • Facility Improvements, and • Other Improvements These improvements are presented following the discussion of improvements completed since 2010. Water System Improvements Completed Since 2009 The City has completed several water system improvements that were identified in the 2010 Comprehensive Water System Plan. These include improvements to the Five Corners Site, pressure reducing station upgrades, rehabilitation of lift stations, extension of water services, and replacement of old and undersized water main. A summary of water system improvements completed since 2009 is shown in Table 9-1. 15-1662 Page 9-1 J Packet Pg. 113 8.A.a of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 9 1 WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS Table 9-1 Water System Improvements Completed Since 2009 Water Projects 2009 to Present Year completed Lift Station #7 & #8 Rehabilitation* 2009 Sound Transit Station* 2010 2010 Waterline Replacement 2011 2011 Waterline Replacement 2011 Woodway Waterline Extension/Replacement 2011 203' Waterline Replacement 2011 Lift Station #2 Rehabilitation* 2011 Shell Valley Access Road Water Main 2011 Main St Waterline Extension (near ferry terminal) 2011 Stonebridge Development* 2011 2012 Waterline Replacement 2012 Lift Station #14 Rehabilitation* 2012 76' Ave Waterline Replacement 2012 2013 Waterline Replacement 2013 Shoreshire Development* 2013 224' Waterline Replacement 2013 Main Street Improvements* 2013 2014 Waterline Replacement 2014 Five Corners Roundabout* 2014 Sewerline Replacement Project, Phase 1 * 2014 Sewerline Replacement Project, Phase 2* 2014 Swedish Medical Center Expansion Projects* 2014 2015 Waterline Replacement 2015 2016 Waterline Replacement 2016 2017 Waterline Replacement 2017 *Projects included portions of water main replacements. Water Main Improvements The following water main improvements were identified from the results of the distribution system analyses presented in Chapter 8 and from the City's list of planned projects. CIP WMI. Annual Water Main Replacement Program Deficiency: Most of the water mains to be replaced within this ongoing program are aging, undersized water mains that do not provide adequate fire flow to meet current requirements Much of this water main is older, cast iron pipe and some areas have had occurrences of 15-1662 Page 9-2 J Packet Pg. 114 8.A.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 9 1 WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS leaks or breaks. Water main improvement projects previously identified in the City's 2010 CIP program have been carried forward and are included within this CIP project. Improvement: Replace existing water main with new ductile iron pipe in accordance with the City's construction standards. The individual water main improvements grouped under this project are shown in Figure 9-2. Information on the individual projects, including proposed water main size, location, and project cost estimate is presented later in this chapter, in Table 9-6. The selection of specific projects will be accomplished annually during the City's budget development process and will be guided by the prioritization presented later in this chapter. This provides the City with the flexibility to coordinate projects that may occur within the same area(s). The projects will include replacing water main appurtenances such as isolation valves, fire hydrants, blow -off assemblies, air release/vacuum relief assemblies and water services. PRV Station and Pressure Relief Improvements The following PRV station improvements and pressure relief improvements include new facilities, abandoning old facilities, and improvements to existing facilities. CIP PRV1: PRV Station 13 Replacement (88th Ave W and 185th St SW) Deficiency: The existing PRV station is old and has reached the end of its useful service life Improvement: Design and install a new PRV station. CIP PRV2. PRV Station 14 Replacement (188th St W and 89th Ave W) Deficiency: The existing PRV station is old and has reached the end of its useful service life Improvement: Design and install a new PRV station. CIP PRV3: PRV Station 15 Replacement (192nd St SW) Deficiency: The existing PRV station is old and has reached the end of its useful service life Improvement: Design and install a new PRV station. CIP PRV4. PRV Station 16 Replacement (12th Ave N and Viewland Way) Deficiency: The existing PRV station is old and has reached the end of its useful service life. Improvement: Design and install a new PRV station. 15-1662 Page 9-3 J Packet Pg. 115 8.A.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 9 1 WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS CIP PRV5: Annual PRV Station Improvements Program Deficiency: Several of the existing PRV stations are anticipated to reach the end of their useful service life during this Plan's 20-year planning period. Other PRV stations require minor improvements to ensure long-term operation and reliability. Improvement: Annually improve or replace PRV stations throughout the system. The City will evaluate needs and select one or more PRV stations to be improved each year. Facility Improvements The following water system facility projects consist of improvements to existing facilities to improve operation, increase capacity, or to ensure long-term performance of the facility. CIP F1: Five Corners Reservoir Improvements Deficiency: A seismic and structural evaluation determined that both the 1.5 MG and 3.0 MG Five Corners Reservoirs lack sufficient freeboard. In addition, both the steel reservoirs were last coated (interior and exterior) in 1994. Based on the typical life of coating on steel reservoirs, recoating is prescribed every 15 to 20 years. Finally, a facility evaluation completed in 2015 determined that both reservoirs have multiple appurtenance deficiencies. Improvement: Structural and seismic improvements including lowering the overflow piping inside both reservoirs, making roof improvements to the 1.5 MG reservoir, and replacing reservoir appurtenances to improve access, venting and overflow piping. The project also includes recoating the interior and exterior of the reservoirs. CIP F2: Yost Reservoir Piping Maintenance and Replacement Deficiency: The piping inside of the reservoir is aging and reaching the end of its useful service life. Improvement: Replace piping inside of reservoir. CIP F3: Seaview Reservoir Piping Maintenance and Replacement Deficiency: The piping inside of the reservoir is aging and reaching the end of its useful service life. Improvement: Replace piping inside of reservoir. 15-1662 Page 9-4 J Packet Pg. 116 8.A.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 9 1 WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS CIP F4: SPU Intertie & Emergency Intertie Improvements Deficiency: The SPU emergency intertie is not connected to a telemetry system and it is difficult to maintain due to its age. The City maintains a total of eleven emergency interties between the City of Lynnwood (five) and OVWSD (six). Ten of these interties do not have the ability to be flushed or metered. Further, they are not outfitted with telemetry equipment. Improvement: Install a new supply station with control valves, flow meters, and a telemetry system for the SPU Intertie. Upgrade the interties with flow meters, telemetry systems, and flushing infrastructure (e.g., fire hydrants or blowoff assemblies) for the ten identified emergency interties. Other Improvements The following improvements include a small pressure zone reconfiguration, and comprehensive planning. CIP M1: Pressure Zone Conversion (325 to 486) Deficiency: A small portion of the 325 Zone, bounded by 8th Ave S, 9th Ave S, Dayton St, and Maple St, has moderately low pressure. Improvement: Convert mains in the area to be served by the 486 Zone by constructing approximately 1,000 linear feet of water main and, if not already installed, adding PRVs on approximately 25 water services. The proposed water main connects the existing 486 Zone water main to the converted 325 Zone water main (12-in, Cast Iron) in Dayton St to the north, in Maple St to the south with water main running parallel to the 325 Zone main, in 8th Ave S to the west, and to existing 486 Zone water main in 91h Ave S to the east. The converted pressure zone impacts further north, to the southside of Main St. CIP M2. Comprehensive Water System Plan Update Deficiency: The City is required to update its Comprehensive Water System Plan every ten years and submit to the Department of Health for review and approval. Drinking water regulations are continuously changing and must be addressed in the City's Comprehensive Water System Plan. Improvement: Update the Comprehensive Water System Plan every ten years to meet the requirements that are in effect at the time of the update and to provide the City with an updated plan for implementing water system improvements. 15-1662 Page 9-5 J Packet Pg. 117 8.A.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 9 1 WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS Project Cost Estimates Project costs were estimated for each of the planned improvements and are presented in 2016 dollars. The planning level project cost estimates include the estimated construction cost and indirect costs. The construction cost estimate portion includes all construction related costs, sales tax and a 10 percent contingency. The indirect cost portion is estimated at 35 percent of the construction cost and includes engineering (preliminary design, final design, and construction management services), surveying, permitting, legal, construction inspection, and administrative services. For projects identified within the downtown area, an additional 20 percent contingency was added to reflect traditionally higher construction costs in the downtown area. Water Main Cost Estimates Construction costs for water main projects were estimated using the water main unit costs (i.e., cost per foot length) shown in Table 9-2. The unit cost of construction for each water main size is based on estimates of all construction -related improvements, which include materials and labor for the water main installation, water services, fire hydrants, fittings, valves, connections to the existing system, trench restoration, full -width roadway asphalt overlay, and other work for a complete installation. The indirect cost component is not included in the water main unit costs shown in Table 9-2. Table 9-2 Water Main Unit Costs for Construction Water Main Diameter (inches) Construction Cost per Foot Length (2016 $$/LF)1 8 $310 12 $360 16 $420 'An additional 20 percent was applied to project costs located in Downtown Edmonds. Unit Costs include all Construction Costs, Sales Tax, and a 10 percent Contingency. Construction Costs include all materials and labor for the water main installation, water services, fire hydrants, fittings, valves, connections to the existing system, trench restoration, full roadway width asphalt surface overlay, and other work for a complete installation. Other Project Costs not included in the Construction Unit Costs are estimated at 35 percent of the Construction Cost and represents engineering (preliminary design, final design, and construction management services), surveying, permitting, legal, and administrative fees. Prioritizing Improvements The planned improvements were prioritized using established criteria to help guide the City with scheduling and budgeting water system improvement projects in future years. A description of the criteria is provided below. 15-1662 Page 9-6 J Packet Pg. 118 8.A.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 9 1 WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS Prioritizing Water Main Improvements Table 9-3 shows the criteria used for prioritizing the water main improvements. The criteria are based on the existing water main deficiencies for each of the categories defined in the table, including existing fire flow capability, age (year of installation), and material. Each category is assigned a weight factor that reflects the relative importance of each category compared to the others. The Existing Water Main Fire Flow Capability category ranks the water main improvements based on the ability of the existing water mains to provide the required fire flow, as determined from the results of the hydraulic analyses presented in Chapter 8. The Existing Water Main Year of Installation and Existing Water Main Material categories rank the water main improvements based on the existing pipe age and material. The water main priority ranking criteria was applied to each water main improvement project, which resulted in a total ranking score for each project. For CIP projects with multiple pipes, the average priority point was assigned to the CIP project. The results of the priority ranking are summarized in Table 9-4 according to the CIP number. Table 9-5 presents the results in an order that is sorted according to total ranking points. Table 9-3 Water Main Improvements Priority Scoring Criteria Points —F� Category Weight Factor Weighted Points Existing Water Main Fire Flow Capability 3 Available Fire Flow is 69% of Target Fire Flow or Less 4 12 2 Available Fire Flow is 70% to 80% of Target Fire Flow 4 8 1 Available Fire Flow is 8 1 % of Target Fire Flow or Greater 4 4 Existing Water Main Year of Installation 6 <1950 2 12 3 1950 - 1970 2 6 1 >1970 2 2 Existing Water Main Material 4 Steel 2 8 2 Cast Iron 2 4 0 Ductile Iron 2 0 0 HDPE 2 0 15-1662 Page 9-7 J Packet Pg. 119 8.A.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 9 1 WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS Table 9-4 Water Main Improvements Priority Scoring — Sorted by CIP Number Prior it , Weighted Scoring Points Number Fire Flow Material Pipe Year Total Points 3' 4 3 5 12 5' 8 4 0 12 6' 8 0 0 8 7' 12 0 6 18 9' 0 4 0 4 14' 0 1 0 1 15' 6 1 0 7 16' 8 2 1 12 18' 3 3 0 6 20' 6 4 3 13 21' 1 3 3 7 24' 4 4 0 8 25' 4 0 6 10 26' 8 4 0 12 27' 4 4 6 14 28' 8 2 0 10 29' 4 4 0 8 30' 4 0 0 4 32' 8 4 6 18 33' 4 4 0 8 34' 4 4 6 14 35' 4 0 6 10 36' 12 4 0 16 37' 8 0 0 8 38' 8 4 6 18 39' 4 4 0 8 40' 4 4 0 8 41' 5 2 1 8 43' 4 4 6 14 44' 2 4 0 6 46' 8 4 0 12 48' 12 0 0 12 49' 4 4 0 8 50' 2 2 6 10 53' 8 0 0 8 56' 0 4 0 4 57' 4 4 0 8 ' 2010 CIP Project carried forward 15-1662 Page 9-8 J Packet Pg. 120 8.A.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 9 1 WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS Table 9-4 Water Main Improvements Priority Scoring — Sorted by CIP Number (continued) CIP Priori , Weighted Scoring Points Number Fire Flow Material Pipe Year Total Points 58' 5 4 4 13 60' 5 3 4 12 61' 0 2 3 5 65' 8 2 0 10 66' 0 4 0 4 67' 12 3 9 24 73' 1 1 1 3 75' 2 2 0 3 76' 2 4 0 6 78' 0 3 2 5 81' 0 4 0 4 82' 8 4 0 12 83' 0 4 3 7 84' 12 4 0 16 92' 0 0 3 3 96' 12 0 0 12 99' 12 4 0 16 108' 1 4 8 13 109' 4 4 6 14 110' 0 4 12 16 111' 0 4 12 16 112' 0 4 12 16 113' 0 4 12 16 114' 0 4 12 16 115' 0 4 12 16 116' 2 4 12 18 117' 0 4 12 16 118' 0 4 12 16 119' 0 4 12 16 120' 0 4 12 16 121' 0 4 12 16 122' 2 4 11 16 123' 0 4 12 16 124' 0 4 12 16 125' 0 4 12 16 127 8 0 0 8 128 8 2 6 16 ' 2010 CIP Project carried forward 15-1662 Page 9-9 J Packet Pg. 121 8.A.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 9 1 WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS Table 9-4 Water Main Improvements Priority Scoring — Sorted by CIP Number (continued) CIP Priori , Weighted Scoring Points Number Fire Flow Material Pipe Year Total Points 129 0 0 12 12 130 12 0 0 12 131 4 0 0 4 132 8 0 0 8 133 4 0 0 4 134 4 0 0 4 135 12 0 0 12 136 8 0 6 14 137 10 4 0 14 138 4 2 3 9 139 10 4 0 14 140 12 0 0 12 141 5 1 2 9 142 4 0 0 4 143 0 0 6 6 144 6 2 0 8 145 0 4 12 16 15-1662 Page 9-10 J Packet Pg. 122 8.A.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 9 1 WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS Table 9-5 Water Main Improvements Priority Scoring — Sorted by Total Points CIP Priority, Weighted Scoring Points Number Fire Flow Material Pipe Year Total Points 67' 12 3 9 24 32' 8 4 6 18 38' 8 4 6 18 116' 2 4 12 18 7' 12 0 6 18 122' 2 4 11 16 84' 12 4 0 16 99' 12 4 0 16 110' 0 4 12 16 111' 0 4 12 16 112' 0 4 12 16 113' 0 4 12 16 114' 0 4 12 16 115' 0 4 12 16 117' 0 4 12 16 118' 0 4 12 16 119' 0 4 12 16 120' 0 4 12 16 121' 0 4 12 16 123' 0 4 12 16 124' 0 4 12 16 125' 0 4 12 16 36' 12 4 0 16 128 8 2 6 16 145 0 4 12 16 137 10 4 0 14 109' 4 4 6 14 139 10 4 0 14 27' 4 4 6 14 34' 4 4 6 14 43' 4 4 6 14 136 8 0 6 14 58' 5 4 4 13 108' 1 4 8 13 20' 6 4 3 13 5' 8 4 0 12 26' 8 4 0 12 46' 8 4 0 12 48' 12 0 0 12 82' 8 4 0 12 96' 12 0 0 12 129 0 0 12 12 ' 2010 CIP Project carried forward 15-1662 Page 9-11 J Packet Pg. 123 8.A.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 9 1 WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS Table 9-5 Water Main Improvements Priority Scoring — Sorted by Total Points (continued) CIP Prior it , Weighted Scoring Points Number Fire Flow Material Pipe Year Total Points 135 12 0 0 12 130 12 0 0 12 140 12 0 0 12 16' 8 2 1 12 60' 5 3 4 12 3' 4 3 5 12 50' 2 2 6 10 28' 8 2 0 10 65' 8 2 0 10 25' 4 0 6 10 35' 4 0 6 10 138 4 2 3 9 141 5 1 2 9 41' 5 2 1 8 144 6 2 0 8 132 8 0 0 8 6' 8 0 0 8 37' 8 0 0 8 24' 4 4 0 8 29' 4 4 0 8 33' 4 4 0 8 39' 4 4 0 8 40' 4 4 0 8 49' 4 4 0 8 53' 8 0 0 8 57' 4 4 0 8 127 8 0 0 8 15' 6 1 0 7 83' 0 4 3 7 21' 1 3 3 7 18' 3 3 0 6 44' 2 4 0 6 76' 2 4 0 6 143 0 0 6 6 61' 0 2 3 5 78' 0 3 2 5 134 4 0 0 4 142 4 0 0 4 133 4 0 0 4 9' 0 4 0 4 ' 2010 CIP Project carried forward 15-1662 Page 9-12 J Packet Pg. 124 8.A.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 9 1 WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS Table 9-5 Water Main Improvements Priority Scoring — Sorted by Total Points (continued) CIP Priority, Wei hted Scoring Points Number Fire Flow Material Pipe Year Total Points 30' 4 0 0 4 56' 0 4 0 4 66' 0 4 0 4 81' 0 4 0 4 131 4 0 0 4 75' 2 2 0 3 73' 1 1 1 3 92' 0 0 3 3 14' 0 1 0 1 ' 2010 CIP Project carried forward Prioritizing Other Improvements All other improvements were prioritized based on project need, maintenance requirements, existing deficiencies, capacity requirements, and reliability considerations. The results of the priority ranking of the water main and all other improvements were used to schedule the improvements, as presented in the section that follows. Schedule of Improvements All water main projects are shown in Table 9-6, which includes a breakdown of each project along with the proposed pipe size, location, and estimated project cost. The estimated project costs are based on 2016 dollars and include all costs (engineering, construction and other costs). The selection and implementation of the water main projects will be accomplished annually by the City, utilizing both the priority ranking information presented earlier in this plan and other information to ensure projects representing the greatest need are completed first. For example, water main projects in an area with low fire flow are a high priority and will be scheduled before projects in a low priority area. Examples of additional information that would be used to establish the annual project list include, but are not limited to, upcoming City and private sector utility projects and City or State transportation projects to be constructed in the same rights -of -way as water main projects. The process would also consider the effect that water main improvements installed as part of private property development projects would have on fire flows, which may change the priorities of projects on the list of annual water main replacements. This approach provides the City with the flexibility to coordinate water main projects with other projects planned for the same area to capture efficiencies and reduce project costs. 15-1662 Page 9-13 J Packet Pg. 125 8.A.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 9 1 WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS The water main projects will be implemented under the Annual Water Main Replacement Program, which is identified as project WM1 in Table 9-7. An annual budget allowance has been established for this ongoing program, as shown in the table. The implementation schedule shown in Table 9-7 includes the previously described water main improvements and all other improvements described earlier in this chapter that are planned in the next 20 years. The implementation schedule will be used by the City to assist in the planning and budgeting of capital improvement projects for the Water Utility. The project cost estimates shown in the table are based on 2016 dollars for all years shown. These cost estimates will be adjusted by the City at the time of project implementation to include an escalation factor that represents inflation and the construction market conditions anticipated at the actual time of construction. The financial program in Chapter 10 describes in more detail the escalation factor to be used for future project cost adjustments. 15-1662 Page 9-14 J Packet Pg. 126 8.A.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 9 1 WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS Table 9-6 Water Main Improvement Projects CIP Size I Description Estimated No. Length Dia In From To Project Cost 650 8 68th Ave 172nd St Dead-end $272,000 520 8 67th Ave 172nd St Dead-end $218,000 3' 280 8 172nd St 67th Ave 68th Ave $117,000 500 8 172nd St Olympic View Drive 67th Ave $209,000 240 8 81 st Ave W 206th St SW Dead-end $100,000 51 320 8 81st Ave 206th St Dead-end $134,000 240 8 Sea Lawn Dr 171st St SW Dead-end $100,000 61 590 8 Sea Lawn Dr 171st St Dead-end $247,000 7' 2,090 8 Lake Ballinger 76th Ave Dead-end $875,000 9' 220 8 217th St SW 96th Ave W 95th Ave $92,000 410 12 81 st PI 212th St Dead-end $199,000 330 12 208th PI 82nd Ave 80th Ave $160,000 14' 540 12 82nd Ave 208th PI Dead-end $262,000 730 8 208th PI 82nd Ave 80th Ave $306,000 420 12 83rd Ave W Woodlake Dr. 208th St SW $204,000 310 12 81 st PI W - Dead-end $151,000 15' 320 12 83rd Ave W - Woodlake Dr $156,000 120 12 Woodlake Dr 84th Ave W 83rd Ave W $58,000 820 12 83rd Ave 84th Ave 82nd Ave $399,000 1,110 12 Lake Baallinger Hwy 99 McAleer Way $539,000 500 12 SR 104 Hwy 99 - $243,000 16' 290 12 - SR 104 242nd St $141,000 640 12 McAleer Way 242nd St Lake Ballinger Way $311,000 840 12 242nd St - McAleer Way $408,000 390 8 175th St SW 76th Ave W Dead-end $163,000 370 8 176th St 76th Ave Sound View Way $155,000 18' 300 8 Sound View Way 176th St Sound View Dr $126,000 880 8 175th St 76th Ave Dead-end $368,000 80 12 216th St SW 73rd PI W - $39,000 140 12 76th Ave W - 215th St SW $68,000 470 12 76th Ave W - - $228,000 340 12 76th Ave W 212th St SW - $165,000 20' 150 12 216th St SW - - $73,000 120 16 216th St SW 73rd PI W - $68,000 830 12 215th St 76th Ave 73rd PI $403,000 480 12 73rd PI 216th St 215th St $233,000 560 12 Stevens Hospital - - $272,000 100 12 76th Ave W - 220th St SW $49,000 60 12 76th Ave W 220th St SW - $29,000 310 12 76th Ave 219th St 220th St $151,000 21' 350 12 76th Ave 218th St 219th St $170,000 390 12 76th Ave 218thSt - $190,000 300 12 76th Ave - 216th St $146,000 230 12 76th Ave 215th St - $112,000 ' 2010 CIP Project carried forward 15-1662 Page 9-15 J Packet Pg. 127 8.A.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 9 1 WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS Table 9-6 Water Main Improvement Projects (continued) CIP Size Description Estimated No. Length Dia In From To Project Cost 680 8 172nd St 72nd Ave 74th Ave $285,000 241 310 8 173rd St 72nd Ave 73rd PI $130,000 25' 660 8 176th St 72nd Ave Dead-end $276,000 290 8 179th St SW 72nd Ave W Dead-end $121,000 261 350 8 179th St 72nd Ave Dead-end $146,000 27' 750 8 80th Pl 212th St Dead-end $314,000 460 8 80th Pl W 200th St SW Dead-end $193,000 28' 690 8 80th PI 200th St Dead-end $289,000 29' 550 8 1 86th PI Maplewood Ln Dead-end $230,000 30' 620 8 198th PI Maplewood Ln Dead-end $259,000 260 8 12th PI N 12th Ave N Dead-end $109,000 321 280 8 12th PI N 12th Ave - $117,000 33' 360 8 185th PI 92nd Ave Dead-end $151,000 341 570 8 186th PI 92nd Ave Dead-end $239,000 35' 670 8 - 184th St Dead-end $280,000 36' 630 8 182nd PI 88th Ave Dead-end $264,000 520 8 74th PI Meadowdale Beach Rd - $218,000 37' 520 8 74th PI Meadowdale Beach Rd Dead-end $218,000 210 8 104th PI SW 72nd Ave W Dead-end $88,000 38' 320 8 164th PI 72nd Ave Dead-end $134,000 39' 1 820 8 192nd PI 80th Ave Dead-end $343,000 40' 1 830 8 Main St Olympic Ave - $347,000 310 8 Ol is Ave Glen ST Dale St $130,000 660 8 Glen St Olympic Ave 1 Oth Ave $276,000 41' 380 8 Olympic Ave Sierra PI Glen St $159,000 350 8 9th Ave N Glen St Dale St $146,000 1,270 8 Daley St Olympic Ave 9th Ave $531,000 43' 430 8 179th PI Talbot Rd Dead-end $180,000 640 8 Sound View Pi Wharf St Dead-end $268,000 44' 400 8 Wharf St Sound View PI Olympic View Dr $167,000 420 8 Water St Sound View Dr Ocean Ave $176,000 461 660 8 Ocean Ave Water St Dead-end $276,000 48' 640 8 Puget Ln 8th Ave Dead-end $268,000 49' 380 8 Brookmere Dr 8th Ave Dead-end $159,000 490 12 - 3rd Ave Dale St $238,000 50' 1,180 8 3rd Ave Cas ers St - $494,000 53' 580 8 High St 183rd PI Dead-end $243,000 56' 550 8 86th PI W 188th St SW Dead-end $230,000 57' 670 8 170th PI Olympic View Dr Dead-end $280,000 500 8 Soundview Dr 72nd Ave W Dead-end $209,000 58' 290 8 Sound View Dr Sound View Ln Dead-end $121,000 200 8 177th St 72nd Ave Sound View Ln $84,000 ' 2010 CIP Project carried forward 15-1662 Page 9-16 J Packet Pg. 128 8.A.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 9 1 WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS Table 9-6 Water Main Improvement Projects (continued) CIP Size Des cri tion Estimated No. Length Diamilimm From � M&- Project Cost 490 12 196th St 80th Ave 81st PI $238,000 620 12 196th St 82nd PI 84th Ave $301,000 60* 270 12 196th St 81st PI 82nd PI $131,000 520 12 192nd St 80th Ave 83rd Ave $253,000 20 12 - 80th Ave W 196th St SW $10,000 710 12 196th St 86th Ave 88th Ave $345,000 * 650 12 196th St 84th Ave 86th Ave $316,000 61 440 12 194th St 88th Ave 89th PI $214,000 680 12 88th Ave 196th St 194th St $330,000 920 12 4th Ave S Dead-end Pine St $447,000 65* 340 12 Pine St 4th Ave S 5th Ave S $165,000 66* 620 8 69th PI 174th St 176th St $259,000 500 8 Sunset Ave N Cas ers St - $209,000 300 12 Railroad Ave Main St Dead-end $146,000 67* 560 12 Sunset Ave Edmonds St - $272,000 1,070 8 Sunset Ave Edmonds St Cas ers St $448,000 670 8 76th Ave W 228th St SW 230 St SW $280,000 1,380 16 Pacific Highway 76th Ave W 230th St SW $782,000 780 12 Pacific Highway 224th St SW 76th Ave W $379,000 73* 130 12 - Hwy 99 76th Ave $63,000 600 12 76th Ave - 228th St $292,000 880 12 76th Ave Hwy 99 224th St $428,000 450 12 Private Property 212th St 213th PI $219,000 250 8 216th St SW 73rd PI W - $105,000 75* 310 8 216th St SW - - $130,000 180 8 72nd Ave W 213th PI SW N/A $75,000 290 8 72nd Ave W N/A 216th St SW $121,000 580 12 Olympic Ave Main St Maple St $282,000 76* 90 8 - Olympic Ave Main St $38,000 40 12 Main St 9th Ave S - $19,000 330 12 9th Ave S Main St Dayton St $160,000 78* 300 12 9th Ave Maple St Dayton St $146,000 630 12 9th Ave Main St Edmonds St $306,000 81 * 650 8 Puget Way 8th Ave 9th Ave $272,000 330 12 Viewland Way Olympic Ave Dead-end $160,000 82* 380 12 - Viewland Way Brookmere St $185,000 700 8 Puget Way 9th Ave N Dead-end $293000 580 8 Emerald Hill Dr/Highland Dr 12th Ave N Highland Dr $243:000 83* 320 8 12th Ave N Emerald Hills Dr Main St $134,000 84* 280 12 77th PI 195th St 196th St $136,000 850 8 81st PI W 196th St - $356,000 92* 500 8 81st PI W - 200th St SW $209,000 96* 340 8 92nd PI W Bowdoin Way Dead-end $142,000 99* 360 8 215th PI SW 96th Ave W Dead-end $151,000 ' 2010 CIP Project carried forward 15-1662 Page 9-17 J Packet Pg. 129 8.A.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 9 1 WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS Table 9-6 Water Main Improvement Projects (continued) CIP Size Description Estimated No. Length Dia In From Project Cost 290 8 8th Ave N Edmonds St Bell St $121,000 108* 470 8 Bell St 8th Ave N 9th Ave N $197,000 280 8 7th Ave N Edmonds St Bell St $117,000 600 8 Main St 8th Ave N 9th Ave N $251,000 109* 640 12 Main St 7th Ave N 8th Ave N $311,000 110* 330 8 Main St 8th Ave S Durbin St $138,000 * 310 12 Dayton St Durbin St 7th Ave N $151,000 111 1,010 12 Da on St 5th Ave S Durbin St $491,000 160 8 7th Ave S Cedar St Magnolia Dr $67,000 300 8 7th Ave S Walnut St Cedar St $126,000 112* 270 12 7th Ave S Dayton St Maple St $131,000 290 12 7th Ave S Maple St Alder St $141,000 300 12 7th Ave Alder St Walnut St $146,000 150 8 Hemlock St 7th Ave S 8th Ave S $63,000 113* 570 8 7th Ave S Spruce St Laurel St $239,000 340 12 7th Ave N Edmonds St Main St $165,000 300 12 5th Ave S Maple St Alder St $146,000 114* 270 12 5th Ave S Dayton St Maple St $131,000 300 12 5th Ave S Alder St Walnut St $146,000 380 8 6th Ave N - Bell St $159,000 115* 250 8 6th Ave N Sprague St - $105,000 290 8 6th Ave N Daley St Sprague St $121,000 640 8 Bell St 6th Ave N 7th Ave N $268,000 116* 470 8 Bell St 5th Ave N 6th Ave N $197,000 380 8 5th Ave N Edmonds St Bell St $159,000 117* 460 8 5th Ave N Bell St Main St $193,000 118* 880 8 4th Ave N Edmonds St Main St $368,000 119* 870 8 3rd Ave N Edmonds St Main St $364,000 120* 870 8 2nd Ave N Edmonds St Main St $364,000 121 * 870 8 Sunset Ave N Edmonds St Main St $364,000 480 8 Sprague St 4th Ave N 6th Ave N $201,000 340 8 Edmonds St 4th Ave N 5th Ave N $142,000 310 8 Edmonds St 3rd Ave N 4th Ave N $130,000 330 8 Edmonds St 2nd Ave N 3rd Ave N $138,000 122* 310 8 Edmonds St Sunset Ave N 2nd Ave N $130,000 390 12 Daley St 3rd Ave N 4th Ave N $190,000 90 12 Daley St 4th Ave N 6th Ave N $44,000 560 8 3rd Ave N - - $234,000 200 12 3rd Ave N Daley St Edmonds St $97,000 123* 1,630 8 2nd Ave N Edmonds St Dead-end $682,000 ' 2010 CIP Project carried forward 15-1662 Page 9-18 J Packet Pg. 130 8.A.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 9 1 WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS Table 9-6 Water Main Improvement Projects (continued) CIP Size Description Estimated No. Length Dia In From To Project Cost 30 12 Main St Sunset Ave N Sunset Ave S $15,000 40 8 Main St 5th Ave N Dead-end $17,000 300 12 Main St 4th Ave N 5th Ave N $146,000 1241 310 12 Main St 3rd Ave N 4th Ave N $151,000 320 12 Main St 2nd Ave N 3rd Ave N $156,000 320 12 Main St Sunset Ave N 2nd Ave N $156,000 140 12 Main St James St Dead-end $68,000 125' 400 8 Sunset Ave S Main St James St $167,000 127 740 8 N Meadowdale Rd 72nd Ave W 163rd PI SW $310,000 230 8 Meadowdale Beach Rd 169th PI SW - $96,000 128 810 8 Meadowdale Beach Rd 74th PI W 169th PI SW $339,000 129 810 8 Sunset Way Olympic View Dr 184th St SW $339,000 130 700 12 Olympis View Dr 76th Ave W Homeview Dr $340,000 131 480 8 94th PI W - Puget Dr $201,000 132 450 8 89th PI W 200th St SW Dead-end $188,000 133 340 12 3rd Ave S James St Dayton St $165,000 134 500 12 Admiral Way Dayton St - $243,000 135 880 12 4th Ave S Dayton St Walnut St $428,000 136 150 8 1Oth Ave S Maple Way Maple St $63,000 220 12 212th St SW 70th Ave W Pacific Highway $107,000 137 660 12 Pacific Hiahway 208th St SW 212th St SW $321,000 1,240 12 Pine St Nootka Rd 2nd Ave S $603,000 138 490 12 Pine St 2nd Ave S 3rd Ave S $238,000 770 8 218th St SW 80th Ave W 77th PI W $322,000 139 570 12 218th St SW 77th PI W 76th Ave W $277,000 140 230 8 7th Ave S Elm St Elm PI $96,000 120 12 224th St SW 73rd PI W 141 280 12 224th St SW 72nd PI W - $136,000 470 12 224th St SW Pacific Highway 73rd PI W $228,000 800 8 236th St SW Pacific Highway 78th Ave W $335,000 142 170 8 236th St SW 78th Ave W 78th Ave W $71,000 143 40 12 238th St SW Pacific Highway - $19,000 70 12 76th Ave W 242nd St SW 242nd PI SW $34,000 144 620 12 76th Ave W 242nd PI SW N 205th St $301,000 396 12 Da on St 2nd Ave S 3rd Ave S $192,000 145 476 12 Dayton St 3rd Ave S 4th Ave S $232,000 211 12 Dayton St 4' Ave S 5th Ave S $103,000 Total Waterline Main Improvements $43,874,000 ' 2010 CIP Project carried forward 15-1662 Page 9-19 J Packet Pg. 131 8.A.a of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water Svstem Plan CHAPTER 9 1 WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS Table 9-7 Planned Improvements Implementation Schedule NIP No. Description Estimated Cost (2016 $$) 20-Year Schedule of Improvements Planned Year of Project and Estimated Cost in 2016 $$ (x 1,000) 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027-2035 Water Main Improvements WM1 Annual Water Main Replacement Program' $51,707,247 $3,801 $1,628 $2,248 $1,920 $2,960 $2,960 $2,610 $2,610 $2,610 $2,610 $25,750 Subtotal Water Main Improvements $51,707,247 $3,801 $1,628 $2,248 $1,920 $2,960 $2,960 $2,610 $2,610 $2,610 $2,610 $25,750 PRV Station & Pressure Relief Improvements PRV' PRV # 13 Replacement $125,000 - $125 - - - - - - - - - PRV2 PRV # 14 Replacement $125,000 - $125 - - - - - - - - - PRV3 PRV # 15 Replacement $125,000 - $125 - - - - - - - - - PRV4 PRV #16 Replacement $125,000 - $125 - - - - - - - - - PRVS Annual PRV Station Improvements Program $400,000 - - - - - - - - - - $400 Subtotal PRV Station & Relief Improvements $900,000 $0 $500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $400 Facility Improvements F1 5 Corners Reservoir Improvements $1,813,000 - $1,813 - - - - - - - - - F2 Yost Reservoir Piping Maintenance and Replacement $85,000 - - - $85 - - - - - - - F3 Seaview Reservoir Piping Maintenance and Replacement $85,000 - - - $85 - - - - - - - F4 SPU Intertie & Emergency Interties Improvements $1,945,000 - - - $195 - - $350 $350 $350 $350 $350 Subtotal Facility Improvements $3,928,000 $0 $1,813 $0 $365 $0 $0 $350 $350 $350 $350 $350 Other Improvements Ml 325 to 486 Pressure Zone Conversion $675,000 - - - $675 - - - - - - - M2 Comprehensive Water System Plan Update $215,000 $65 - - - - - - - - - $150 Subtotal Other Improvements $890,000 $65 $0 $0 $675 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $150 Total All Improvements $57,425,247 $3,866 $3,941 $2,248 $2,960 $2,960 $2,960 $2,960 $2,960 $2,960 $2,960 $26,650 ' Given the longevity of the program, the budget amount for the Annual Water Main Replacement Program (CIP No. WMI) includes currently known replacement projects as well as an allowance for additional water main replacements that are not currently identified. 15-1662 Page 9-20 J Packet Pg. 132 8.A.a Packet Pg. 133 FDl9, FIGURE 9-1 w,r rJ J >I Comprehensive Water System Plan 2010 - 2017 Water Main Improvements murraysmith June 2017 Legend p Emergency Intertie Existing Water Mains: A Pressure Reducing Station 325 Zone Water Main a6 I Pump Station — 420 Zone Water Main a Reservoir 425 Zone Water Main s❑ Supply Station 486 Zone Water Main 0 Pressure Relief Facility 500 Zone Water Main City of Edmonds Retail 505 Zone Water Main �— Water Service Area 596 Zone Water Main _ Other Water Service Areas Year of Installation*' City Limits � 201 ■ ■ Snohomish/King County Boundary — 2016 2015 — 2014 — 2013 — 2012 — 2011 — 2010 N 0 2,000 Scale in Feet rSJ Sea iew � PRV #13 Reservoir,86TH sTnl I MG) PRV #14 s BLAKE PL V9DASNT 19, ST I FRPvcT P1- - PLSW 4f, /N ANFS T PRV #15 01SrRfAM ANf 2Q 9LCl OREDSTT CITY OF pT s�D c9ti ELIle EDMONDS�s •`♦',• LHG w 0 OL/6c EXCE SJ S�(lI2 PL 94TH Pl- 8' 1•!GEL P u g e t 4r;" MELODY WAY LANEIN H, m 1 TH S SW �TyN p LA E VIEA S o u n d ` 6 HL LEv WL iz a I DW V BROOKME DR PRV#23 .am PVE.N 00� PL SN, MA RO Tq ¢3 ! 2 Q O CA IRS ST VIEWMOOR PL o PRV m u oo H 1 ATER VISTA MOUNTAIN Pressure Relief#19 NE PL LANE CAB ADE' VI TA1n#11) a —S / CASCADE DR LA ALOH WAY ALOHA ST CAI SIERRA p CAROLWAY P ` 1 yJ2 h O ST QP E PL PL SA � 1 w/ ? I SIER ST 203R O ALIY ST J BPRAG°E ST O ! O = 205TH PLSW m v PP o�Y 4 zoTTH o"IjN = 4MS ST BELL ST > PRV #18 P MAIN IT . HILL R NFP RV PLSW' #17 Sjs 0 TONS TDAVTON ST MAPLE S AY Yost n 209 H F LUND'S GULCH Pressure Relief #4�t -� r & PL .1 lII i Emergency Intertie with City Lynnwood 573 Zc Supply froi Alclerwoo( Water Distri (635 Zone Q P P s 'aGti I RV C #5 2NID f3 "'q pEMK STS� QP E PRV #7 d 'IsTH STSW 5TH S 1TST 1J4TH PL 18, /^ VL! PRV #8 5TH ST sw S NDVIE 177TH ry �• - CU �79iH c 1T8TH PL SVV sw �eoDLSFIV, 'II]ST ° w 6111 PLs'ry d i 1 ,a2N°sTsv✓ W\OOE wPI 0 , c2NO L Q YMp4T W P Emergency Interties T r E O °"Ew R �� with City of Lynnwood 11-H U I 573 Zone ti _ I �. PRV #2a %IFoF r O N PRV #9 �i O { YjY1��4H HIaNE LW:. J: PL O SNJ F1 ST SWIY rY�TT�1]I4.yI-��, s, s- � 19- � "�' � �r�, cC �3 L u L �111 c P d 184TH r - lift 193RD ST SIN •�.. PLSW 199TH al PLSW 203RI ST SW TH PL SW W 0 TH ST m 26sTH S1 �cINNE • C �P MAPLE ST 'IT Reservoir Five CornersTS ALDERST (1.5 MG)u Reservoirs and IT W ,for ALNUTBT ,Pump Station R (3.0 MG & a "PLSW HOW LL HOLLY OR a CEDA ST CEDAR L a 1. S 2 3T `� 1'.5. MG) P6 WA LAND GNOLIA R 1 U 5 QP0 y� •w I � C1 pL ITS 11 RDq� 'HEICLOC WAV w HEMLOC ST a L N m O QOWOGV E EN EAMONT U EL WAV >_ AY LANE LAURELS 2, 5TH BT SW ii_ , H . POINT •-— r PINE ST 216TH 2,6THST W PLBW �,i Ems,.,. ,,`F, ~ !- FORSYTH PL SW 'II LANE 217TH ST 11 Emergency Intertie , with Olympic View P FI STV1 P18TH PLW 2'6TH ;I e' Water District FL y Woodway 353 Zone Y Mw m LM S -� #2 ITH ST S4V ' WHITCOMB PL IPRV #20 EM ti Emergency lntertiesj— Emergency Interties � PLSW ' 1 ° with Olympic View,with Olympic View' Wat 5 Done ct I_. . s, KDL Water District Try 50 Z �� I q 415 Zone WAY TT�Ta H 1 O !9/90 IT III .LL1 a I I.i PL SW'i Emergency Intertie �I o ALGONOUIN- o ROAD ,5TH" - --- z m m I with Olympic View l.._..y BTBW Water District 226TH I s;•: 540 Low Zone a w } o 228TH _ r� i 228TH ST S,'i o o 0 o PLSW IJ �r a "DEER DR 9TH " 1 UNINCORPORATED o � PL,5W o OS �. l:' N EER DR �Q J 11 5 SNO HO MISH 230TH ST SVv I 5D. Pi2sw-I psW 45. T... ► ,::,S10r,COUNTY f.J.' - W 232ND ITS \ J� Ew y o� OLYMPIC VIEW \ OLLYFARE TOWN OFWOODWAY �PWs PP�PP wWATER & SEWER DISTRICT; i33R°PLBW. MAPLE E I--•1234T TSW $ ��'. MADRONA LANE w p 235TH PLSW -,��6 rrI I _ - 11 A 1 PLSW4TH ST SW, 5 1 m o . . ... { - 238T11 ST SW . a ry lr':" z T 239TH $ ST 9 R. .� PLSW �a }1 51 240TH�, � 241 S F I w.✓ - I F� ••. PLSW o i EAGLE Ic � 1 ( aisw P ff LANE .ROLE • I. , r.. Standby Supply from 242ND ST II 243RD. eFiRB,Y. I �. D'-.. ..... ".. s Seattle Public Utilities I Mp 243RD PL w ■ ■ ST1�BWf.�� i,I �qm �� W04, � SNOHOMISH COUNTY (592 Zone) The City of Edmonds makes no representations, express or implied, - _ - F s fyy as to the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information KING COUNTY displayed. This map is not suitable for legal, engineering, or surveying SEATTLE PUBLIC purposes. Notification of any errors is appreciated. Source: City of Edmonds G S, Washington State Dept. of Health and UTILITIES Snohomish County GIS (March 2016). - :.CCilT�tN lr7,-.{�1''_': _: '.• .,5s_rjt: �l CC 199TH 524 YOF •. uJ.l. m.. - - cl LYNNWOOD ` C LiJ ML 99 W _ O N Emergency Interties with City of Lynnwood r O 573 Zone ' I 10TH T S ` r0+ 2,2 ST,-r �^1 213 H l .I VL::� PL W 2 STSW -I S4TF 0 ALBIO" wnv O E rI 2, 9TH ST SW P� LU C Ir,. O E I ALEE WAY( Lake Ballipi ger ST •+ 1 CITY OF "STSW MOUNTLAKE TERRACE + I NORTH C DIS' 1 fM-■ f f Packet Pg. 134 8.A.a ti r N d d V C O Q ti r O N d C 7 7 C fC d E O r N cn L O E W r E :.i Q Packet Pg. 135 °` F.D'19' FIGURE 9-2 � "` DO �r� 1 iL?il Comprehensive Water System Plan Proposed Capital Improvements murraysmith June 2017 Legend ❑ Emergency Intertie © Pressure Reducing Station Pa Pump Station Reservoir Lsl Supply Station 7 Pressure Relief Facility ® Zone Valve (Closed) City of Edmonds Retail Water Service Area �� ! Other Water Service Areas City Limits ■ ■ Snohomish/King County Boundary Pressure Zones: 325 Zone 420 Zone 425 Zone 486 Zone 500 Zone 505 Zone 596 Zone O CIP Project ID Water Main Improvements: ....... Orr ....... 12" ....... 16" FISHER ROAD 6Is L L.. — jl N AL ERWOOD � WATER & =WA $TEWATER oe,°'� 0 2,000 1� m DISTRICT 1! aW Scale in Feet /� aDl 6'D1 PRV #3 "y — Pressure Relief #4 Emergency Inter) with City of I �;� _ - �•D✓1 Lynnwood 573 Zc 6'DI Iral+I sk sW l '/ 38 •. •.<� ' F5 '� —Supply froi 4 _ aro Alderwoo< _66rH PL 6w'� PRV #2 - Water Distri b m I� (635 Zone D . PRV #6 x W - AL 128 of 0 O 8♦/cW - PRV C: 7 .W ;,.!o � C ��. ► ��' � ,..�,� _ m .. `�� DEP` 2a •• •�.. .�D5i2NDe�W�.r.... � lC d �®�� R ° m ® — C / PRV #7 c , " T K PL 1 I 18 as fA ^ E RI 1 43 _ • B• PRV #8 18 •• 25 6TaISW °,k 88 - lC o PL S.. 11471T/ 6C1 6'CI1° K•26 •• • a m 60 ,]S H 4) a.D, _ 6"CI a"L]1" 6'CI 16'HOPE s"DI 180TH � ST S ✓ e"DID r• . m 9 s"cl �o` I—sT sw 129�0' f�' 0 •W2N0 36 Ls.+ _ PRV- ' ND Si KW ,e, ST PL 6W Gi m eD °"DI F5 ND ST Sw _ L /f 53 F3 35 as "' ' 6r�6i< ZeD _ - EWAr W "W m S 'LSW ° - ° a.. m 0..::..°• m PRV #13 - I ° m - $/ Emergency Interties V a✓� 13o r g eW with City of Lynnwood " .•1w �I •,. 44 1 6. D1,2•DI" ,rDl ,2•D, ao a 5 3 STSW 7Zonei Q •a' `r/ •,•�Reservoir� 6PRV #14DPRV1,68Ta'®rs (1.5MG) F _ w° m m8D9 e'o180 0 m a`DIY im F5 � 6C 6•CI �� PRV #24 MY �f e PRV2 - N_e•cl ., � - �j�r'• P #9� O _ ss _ 0 m f; 0 5a _ f N - °. ��J ° crsa�6 ham`,B KEPL m e•DI - -THPLsw.: ..... j] IF. a.:. - PLNNY LAN ]T'I.LT I PRV4 PkHN.rwneE � s"DI s"DI° s9i"PLsw +�+ 6 • „r�r1 m 6Q • 6 m W 19a? TH STSOW'. x '{I II IlIllTll 6 ° ' " 8'DI 8 Dv Ns d, .O BjDl,:,: B'DI. Q :DI c o LiL J.J_V ��'r.J��l�{J�y � , !.. rDN-E (/l cT - m �� <•orRE<W a PRV - ' ,CQ m6cl 'DI _ 51RRR m a•• RLq r'stsT ST sw ..... 39 •PARK L I R HST n 8'DI 8'DI 8'DI a"pl •� " ' °✓a�� RR� CITY OF9aT��ts� ? _ _ ;I�t1-.�/uro:aW PAR d f' a`° n< •' °"cea - a"DnTs ao a�ExcE� wEDI oEDMONDS es'a - ° _ m o •01_ - K •aa • s•DI e'DI e•m 7ferai -. 6'I - 'a•DI.� s+• j�,lI�IIIL`Ii'T ct 8••va 01131 �g JVET OR 8'DI O. •.• . F12.• ........6•.•L/. r a.D, m �:. 0O° • P . ...•o96. - 6T 6TH S IL 524 UUU�i- �a oNY N a, o a m PRV5 - SW 9oT, a"Dnln r L,W ,ti vIFwLANorol s`DI - s^q l sr sw Y z ' -ti- oF .._ I'•uwo e 6THsN 26 �N� m ° :•a.. • PRV #23 , 6•CI m9z rz _ _ • • • 6 CI B` 8'DI � m � m � 2•RlpryiDlSfi^6w' , 16'DI N ~ 6'CI C PE�� o4J PB'Clm E—OOR 82 PRV 13.$ 30 '°° " : - - - CITY OF 198TH L 6'CI 0 VI ° ` i. L { C1L y s - vlsi #16 •m'° 12'Dl 12•DI 12-DI "' ®RHs swlifDl s•cl �,lJ�� LYNNWOOD �GILTI•R PL FTTI P U g e t Pressure Relief#19J,�• , 9�WT®. - "^O�n® _ I �I >, j • so •oeroIAI ^Li rn a•m zs, ST PL svo 6"D' s sw � ,.� I T r— C: Sound 6' - �A�� ¢ o�arA PL A - DI arol 'DI 8'6620®DL9gv✓ 1 �62N0s T A ' • ° aLEN. - m -.. � „•� , � ♦ m = a s`DI a•cLeN sr• sIeR,A`• Is"ca 202ND S-IN Q G m � 'DI 8'DI �8ro1� �+ �ti �o `.z.L. ®�iI•� arol m - a.D, _ --- a ai •dALw w 6rol eD e•m �° RD -A. ST iU1 ♦ �s 8..•� _ •.• . m=32 ;�•e;yi - .::'P1 ' g � a m 01 P Emergency Interties -20— o :U • e� a'Dj 11s PIRsi °C oa. ,.,r���F sN. f _ i ^ ' 9 _ N `• OO • am m e•° g o�jm - m"Hope s 6'DI s•m 8•DI eDl e•Dlm ^e•DI with City of Lynnwood Lid DY 573 Zone • • • ..• ¢ aL`"°� 6" PRV #18� o - 9TerowLso 3 _ - o6TN M0 •.� z..;. _•:...., e .1{oq PRV ° — 7 y PL F5 Cm° ssr •L r 12" - 1ne..: a . r a.. �L . , r" 7 ] 5_ r •��I,��°e �. �D^�i^P�.OA�° °a,D�" '"�a'Oi " 45 —_• .w>,.3"�5;12rA° EemAaNMo.D8uL.'°CDg.d•K.®p.wP:°mo .. .8'.DC,�°. ® �O,�.i�+ .4A1. D1.2IA.a5•U.o.HC[m°,.,09r.aPW 8<C.1..;� ,•—,;AzHc6Ol roC Qsrsaa 95,p2.j.6"." ..Y.%.\]/a OC1(�.•� •_ #F118rz e-s8-eaDIsr...v�°oa"iDrI -§��ala�� — c°6♦.°'<ti•� .. o e•�,o9 °_ 58 9rHmsi8'DmI �,remc'p l . ry:§Y'4= ITYost 14R71i4pDiDi :::12. .� MGR / 10 34 PumpSnF2P7 ReservoirFiI 13]= "�-r•,� _ ._ a nd.28 5 - ° I F5 ,TT - 3 ;1 eroaDI o (3.0 M= > ; r " c111 15 M2'C cl ziH STGrLs18"C (2)1VSfLy_0) i D ... .. 13 2,Sr33 A a'DIa 20 m 2d83ii O 0 6E S NRO _ MONT LAND N'GU C6P a•Dl °•D - 8'DI e'O'• TH ,b s`Na, sT sN/ • ]8 (� aD ,3�• vm Lis : asT„ss'Iss4^'° ° a P1 .?a,vr<.. YTh--I D t {.�• IB'I.�>• 6'C PNE Sie.......... D 6'CI`O 'CI 'OO •CI a 6'C ••= 992,bT, ST s,nk.C1''_° .6 •C D a L F5 naDSP wy Q — ,6�I�PL�'I 6CI ®CF' a"C 6'CI e•D, 6ro e"02 8'D SL! 12•DI V.12"D L _ 8 a'6'V RSYM A t _ :"e.�,]TH ST SW �I m 4'DI8'D _ mergency Intertie _ with Olympic View �" ss: a° 80 Er, 3 T _ -�� ? '° s•De,a ms'DI s"D xiyar sn D 6-DI e•• ,39 3 y. PIT Water District;,m - ", - _ - m - _ ••••••• Woodway 353 ZoneSE - b °° 6•°' a - ..1m 8•D EL S �� m m --.. M 12'm 12'DI 140 of I 1 0 6'H DP m 8'DI e'DI 8'DI _ 12`CI 6�DI =6'D OT" s "r PRV #20 PL —MrLR _ r _ _ s.c Olympic •,sz W has221ST IL , 22)TH IT SW with Olympic View FS L with OI m is View• �• � I zz2ND.5TSN; � Emergency Interties Emergency,Interties O Water District ° >Water District i F5 �, "E I<LI SI A; 415 Zone224TH IL SW wA 505 Zone `` Lake - �o Emergency Intertie'-, _.. . _. If A GDND .� �? with Olympic View - E q Water District- _...l`ti• ° 226iHSTs.r 540 Low Zone ---- aiH P,. �, j 226TH aT I. — --- !• LL. i:l `. UNINCORPORATED A° .. ^� 8 TOWN OF Da ��T"PLSW a OLYMPIC VIEW SNOHOMISH 116TPST ; I! WOOD.WAY s°EE0. WATER & SEWER DISTRICT: - 16•DI I �. , COUNTY 26, STv-- s� zszlvo sr sw ,•� I+oLLV LANE w•-- e^DI � .ILs, �.iPN;v__� 12`DI 104 j ' -A LANF R LANE ft e"DI P+� its Ir �— i a"DI s° ao -- y 219TH ST SW U _ -J1 1 226TH6TaW 8'DI ,. m c• •. •.� -- J � - g3ROPL SW� < • 141 • ]3 � 226TH PL 6bW" ..=`�i �,IP� •• ~L:t; �� - I CITY -OF ' 2NSTs1� a { MOUNTLAKE s"DI TERRACE' cJi" _- m P[�1 7 '12- M1 m m • 21 .,. " j I_ �.J,ti f' 2NTISTSW .�� IIr } I- e... . •14.. 6 D rYV ry L_ '9 c 6'c, .2.. ••♦ -- Pill ppY, r i�rir ... ? $• 2 z mMcpLEBi� .sT sw z3 rry 1II1 2'CI e D e --a TI !,� ^¢ ST SW eWQY /y r Lake O Ballinger Y I � _LL226TH --_ �O• 246TH ST smW i TP a'DQ WDI^ Close-up of CIP M1 - 4 -- Standby Supply from ` 7 q / 9� �=�=, -- o 1 — Conversion of 325 Zone to 486 Zone _ Cross indicates im Close-up of Updated CIP 21 Seattle Public Utilities • •• �':•. :z..•• N� _ 8'DI •PLs . , -hatching converted area (592 Zone) b . The City of Edmonds makes no representations, express or implied, 4W ! ■- s r 2 ❑ F4 16 .wNy i" 6'c• 8"O s SNOHOMISHCOUA as to the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information"Ni ttp displayed. This map is not suitable for legal, engineering, or surveying purposes. Notification of anyy errors is appreciated. KING COUNTY SEATTLE PUBLIC I NORTH CIl Source: City of Edmonds GIS, Washington State Dept. of Health and Snohomish County GIs (April 2017). UTILITIES I WATER DISTF Packet Pg. 136 8.A.a ti r N d d V C O Q ti r O N d C 7 7 C fC d E O r N cn L O E W r E :.i Q Packet Pg. 137 8.A.a CHAPTER 10 1 FINANCIAL PLAN Introduction The primary goal of the financial plan is to develop a multi -year rate strategy that generates enough revenue to cover the operating and capital costs associated with providing water utility service in the City of Edmonds. This analysis focuses on defining the amount of revenue needed to meet the system's financial obligations including: • Fiscal policies • Capital costs • Operation and maintenance costs • Existing/new debt service obligations • Administrative and overhead costs The financial analysis evaluates the affordability of the City's water rates, considering the impacts of completing the water utility capital improvement program (CIP). Past Financial Performance Table 10-1 summarizes the water utility's financial performance from 2010 — 2015, as documented in the City's financial statements (Statement of Net Position). It is worth noting that the City historically tracked its water, sewer, and stormwater utilities in a combined operating fund, making it relatively difficult to evaluate the water utility's financial performance alone. The City was able to provide utility accounting reports at a sub -account level of detail, which enabled the construction of a simple financial report mimicking an income statement for 2010 — 2012. Because the City changed its accounting practices in 2013 to track each utility's operating fund separately, Table 10-1 reflects the water utility's actual Statement of Net Position for 2013 — 2015. In addition to the income statement, this analysis tracks several financial metrics: • O&M Coverage Ratio: This ratio summarizes the ability of operating revenues to cover operating expenses, and is computed by dividing total operating revenues by total operating expenses (excluding depreciation, which is a non -cash expense). A ratio of 1.00 or greater suggests that revenues are adequate to cover operating expenses, with higher values indicating stronger financial performance. • Net Operating Income (as a Percent of Operating Revenue): This metric shows the ability of operating revenue to cover operating expenses. For consistency with the City's financial statements, this metric includes depreciation as an expense. • Debt Service Coverage Ratio: This ratio provides a basis for evaluating financial performance in the context of the amount of net revenue available for parity debt 15-1662 Page 10-1 June 2017 Prepared by FCS Group Packet Pg. 138 8.A.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 10 1 FINANCIAL PLAN service (on an annual basis). It is calculated by dividing net revenue (revenues less expenses before depreciation) by annual parity debt service. Table 10-1 Historical Financial Performance (2010 - 2015) ISummary of Water Utilitv Financial Performance 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Operating Revenues Water Sales Revenue Hydrant Revenue Water Utility Tax Collections Other Charges for Services Other Operating Revenues Total Operating Revenues Operating Expenses Personnel Services Water Purchased for Resale Operations and Maintenance Professional Services Insurance Depreciation Total Operating Expenses $ 3,817,342 $ 4,273,829 $ 4,617,109 $ 5,054,764 $ 5,533,916 $ 6,089,810 141,789 107,888 68,616 145,523 188,170 92,523 713,748 798,993 863,132 944,824 1,034,551 1,138,481 - - - 2,469 1,174 3,254 91,590 120,034 122,748 136,207 136,359 67,406 $ 4,764,469 $ 5,300,744 $ 5,671,605 $ 6,283,787 $ 6,894,170 $ 7,391,475 $ 830,889 $ 977,471 $ 983,615 $ 1,069,045 $ 1,063,953 $ 1,060,442 1,242,227 1,347,968 1,448,400 1,499,289 1,492,894 1,514,798 1,728,127 1,808,633 1,930,633 2,107,257 2,730,461 2,593,293 432,034 41,210 45,810 51,285 144,861 133,864 81,729 84,512 70,440 67,607 74,688 70,904 486,844 487,135 516,900 614,518 736,330 856,511 $ 4,801,851 $ 4,746,929 $ 4,995,798 $ 5,409,001 $ 6,243,187 $ 6,229,812 Net Operating Income (Loss) $ (37,382) $ 553,815 $ 675,807 $ 874,786 $ 650,983 $ 1,161,663 Non -Operating Revenues (Expenses) Intergovernmental $ 50,844 $ 237,884 $ 152,068 $ 161,294 $ 88,835 $ 58,129 Investment Earnings 4,944 3,280 17,464 8,855 19,582 38,557 Gain (Loss) on Sale of Capital Assets 3,002 - - - - (23,935) Interest Expense (74,809) (70,417) (281,376) (69,187) (29,339) (618,288) Total Non -Operating Revenues (Expenses) $ (16,020) $ 170,746 $ (111,844) $ 100,962 $ 79,078 $ (545,537) Income (Loss) Before Contributions and Transfers Capital Contributions Transfers Out Change In Accounting Principle - GASB 68 Change In Net Position Total Net Position - Beginning Prior Period Adjustments Adjusted Net Position - Beginning Change In Net Position Total Net Position - Ending $ (53,402) $ 724,561 $ 563,963 $ 975,748 $ 730,061 $ 616,126 38,668 37,879 79,781 97,382 331,499 269,222 962,375 77,134 245,800 - (833) (1,885) $ 947,641 $ 839,574 $ 889,544 $ 1,073,130 $ 1,060,727 $ 204,860 $11,494,126 $12,441,767 $13,281,340 $14,170,884 $15,244,014 $16,580,270 - - - - 275,529 (17,091) $11,494,126 $12,441,767 $13,281,340 $14,170,884 $15,519,543 $16,563,179 947,641 839,574 889,544 1,073,130 1,060,727 204,860 $12,441,767 $13,281,340 $14,170,884 $15,244,014 $16,580,270 $16,768,039 0&M Coverage Ratio 1.10 1.24 1.27 1.31 1.25 1.38 Net Operating Income as % of Operating Revenue -0.78% 11.67% 13.53% 16.17% 10.43% 18.65% Debt Service Coverage Ratio 3.15 7.72 3.24 3.17 2.10 Z33 Key findings from Table 10-1 include: • Total water sales revenue increased by 55.1% from 2010 - 2015, primarily due to the fact that the City increased its water rates by 47.6% during that period. 15-1662 Page10-2 June 2017 Prepared by FCS Group Packet Pg. 139 8.A.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 10 1 FINANCIAL PLAN • Total operating expenses (including depreciation) increased by 29.7% from 2010 — 2015. Excluding depreciation, the water utility's cash operating expenses increased by 24.5% over the past six years. • The O&M coverage ratio began at 1.10 in 2010, and has since varied from 1.24 — 1.38. This suggests that the water utility's operating revenues have been adequate to cover operating expenses (excluding depreciation) for the past six years. • Net operating income was slightly below zero in 2010, signifying that operating revenues were inadequate to fully cover operating expenses and depreciation. It has generally increased each year thereafter. • The debt service coverage ratio has consistently remained above 2.00, comfortably above the minimum of 1.25 required by the City's bond covenants. When the City issued revenue bonds in 2015, Moody's cited the utilities' healthy coverage ratio and stable operating history as grounds for a bond rating of "Aa3" (signifying that the City has "very strong" capacity to meet its financial commitments). Capital Funding Sources The City may fund the water CIP from a variety of sources, described in further detail below. Government Programs Federal and state grant programs were historically available to local utilities for capital funding assistance, but have largely been scaled back or replaced by loan programs due to budgetary constraints. Those that remain are generally lightly funded and heavily subscribed. Nevertheless, even low -interest loans present worthwhile opportunities for cost savings. Funding programs for which the City might be eligible include: Community Economic Revitalization Board (CERB) Grant and Loan Program A division of the Washington State Department of Commerce, CERB provides grants and loans for infrastructure improvements including utility projects (grants are available only when a loan is not reasonably possible). Eligible applicants include cities, towns, port districts, special-purpose districts, federally recognized Indian tribes, and other municipal corporations. This program prioritizes projects that create or retain jobs for low and moderate -income residents — because it is need -based and intended to be a "last -resort" relative to other funding sources, the City might not qualify for assistance. More information is available at http://www.commerce.wa.gov/building-infrastructure/community-economic- revitalization-board. 15-1662 Page10-3 June 2017 Prepared by FCS Group Packet Pg. 140 8.A.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 10 1 FINANCIAL PLAN Public Works Trust Fund (PWTF) Loan Program Administered by the Public Works Board, this program provides low -interest loans for local governments to finance public infrastructure construction and rehabilitation. Eligible projects must improve public health and safety, respond to environmental issues, promote economic development, or upgrade system performance. Relying on funding decisions made by the State Legislature, this program has been very limited in recent years due to competing legislative priorities. The next funding cycle begins in the summer of 2017. Information regarding the application process as well as rates and terms are posted on the PWTF website in early spring. Further detail is available at http://www.pwb.wa.gov. Drinking Water State Revolving Fund (DWSRF) Loan Program DWSRF funding historically targets protection of public health, compliance with drinking water regulations, and assistance for small and disadvantaged communities. Applicants need an approved water system plan (or plan amendment) containing the DWSRF project prior to submitting an application. All public water systems that receive a DWSRF loan must undergo an environmental review, a cultural review, and an Investment -Grade Efficiency Audit (IGEA). The IGEA is an effort to apply energy efficiency to water systems and may be financed as part of the DWSRF loan. The 2017 application cycle will begin on October 2nd and conclude on November 30th. Further detail is available at http://www.doh.wa.gov. Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program The CDBG program assists with final design and construction of water, sewer, stormwater, and other projects serving economic development. These projects must principally benefit low to moderate -income people in non -entitlement cities and counties. Cities or towns must have a population fewer than 50,000 people and counties must have a population fewer than 200,000 people. Applications for the 2017 program are due in June of 2017. More information can be found at www.commerce.wa. og v/cdbg. Public Debt There are two major types of public debt that utilities use to finance capital investment: General Obligation (G.O.) Bonds G.O. bonds are secured by the full faith and credit of the issuing agency, committing all available tax and revenue resources to debt repayment. With this high level of commitment, G.O. bonds have relatively low interest rates. However, the Washington Constitution and statutes limit the amount and use of G.O. bond funds in relation to assessed valuation. RCW 39.36.020 states that: "(ii) Counties, cities, and towns are limited to an indebtedness amount not exceeding one and one-half percent of the value of the taxable property in such counties, cities, 15-1662 Page 10-4 June 2017 Prepared by FCS Group Packet Pg. 141 8.A.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 10 1 FINANCIAL PLAN or towns without the assent of three -fifths of the voters therein voting at an election held for that purpose. (b) In cases requiring such assent counties, cities, towns, and public hospital districts are limited to a total indebtedness of two and one-half percent of the value of the taxable property therein." While bonding capacity can limit availability of G.O. bonds for utility purposes, they can play a useful role in project financing if available. These bonds can benefit ratepayers through lower interest rates and other related cost savings, but also spread the repayment obligation to all tax -paying properties (not just developed properties) through the authorization of an ad valorem property tax levy. Revenue Bonds Commonly used to fund utility capital improvements, revenue bonds are secured solely by utility revenues. Revenue bonds do not require a commitment of the issuing agency's other revenue sources (e.g., taxes) for debt repayment, and as a result they typically bear higher interest rates than G.O. bonds. They also generally come with additional requirements to protect bondholders from default risk, including the maintenance of a dedicated bond reserve and minimum standards of financial performance (debt service coverage). Revenue bonds can be issued in Washington without a public vote. There is no bonding limit, except perhaps the practical limit of the utility's ability to generate sufficient revenue to repay the debt and meet required coverage ratios. Utility Resources The City's Water Utility Fund (Fund 421) consists of an accumulation of cash resources that the City can use for capital project funding. In addition to existing cash balances, the City can use utility revenues to either fund projects directly or repay debt issued to fund the projects. With respect to capital funding, rate revenue is most appropriate for moderate, ongoing investments such as annual replacement programs. For larger projects, the City would need to generate cash funding in advance (or issue debt if that is not possible). General Facilities Charges Under the authority of RCW 35.92.025, the City imposes general facilities charges (GFCs) on development as a condition of service. In addition to any other costs related to physically connecting a customer to the system, the GFC is typically based on a blend of historical and planned future capital investment in system infrastructure — its underlying premise is that growth (future customers) will pay for an equitable share of the costs that the utility has incurred (or will incur) to provide capacity to serve new customers. While the RCW does not explicitly define a methodology for calculating GFCs, the GFC is generally calculated by dividing an allocable "cost of the system" by the applicable customer 15-1662 Page 10-5 June 2017 Prepared by FCS Group Packet Pg. 142 8.A.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 10 1 FINANCIAL PLAN base served by the system to arrive at a cost per unit of capacity. The ensuing sections discuss the various aspects of the GFC calculation in further detail. Existing Cost Basis The GFC cost basis includes costs associated with existing assets to recognize that those assets will provide benefit to new customers. In addition to this documented cost of existing assets, RCW 35.92.025 allows the City to recover a provision for interest accrued on assets. Conceptually, this interest provision (which is limited to ten years of interest accrual on each asset) attempts to account for opportunity costs that the City's customers incurred by supporting investments in infrastructure rather than having the money available for investment or other uses. This cost basis is adjusted to reflect: • Construction Work In Progress: The City has substantial investments in capital projects that are currently underway — these projects are not completed or booked as assets, but do represent an investment made by the City in the system. Consequently, the cost of construction work in progress is added to the GFC cost basis. • Contributed Assets: Assets funded by developer extensions are excluded from the cost basis on the premise that the GFC should only recover costs actually incurred by the City. Net Outstanding Debt Principal: When a new customer connects to the City's system and becomes a ratepayer, they will pay for a proportionate share of the annual debt service payments associated with the City's outstanding debt. To recognize this and avoid double charging customers for assets through GFCs and rates, the cost basis reflects a deduction for outstanding debt principal net of available cash balances. • Provision for Asset Retirement: The City recognizes that many of the capital expenditures in the future cost basis are planned as repair and replacement projects for existing infrastructure. An adjustment is made to the existing cost basis for assets that will be replaced by the capital projects proposed to avoid double charging for both existing assets and their replacement. Future Cost Basis The GFC cost basis also includes costs associated with future water CIP projects to recognize that (a) certain projects are needed to expand capacity for growth, and (b) other projects involve replacing existing assets at a higher cost than the City's original investment in those assets. The capital costs included in the future cost basis are generally based on the capital program developed in this Plan, though inflation is backed out of the cost estimates. The future cost basis excludes projects funded by grants or developer extensions, as well as project cost reimbursements from the City's other utilities (which represent investments by those utilities that would most equitably be recovered through their respective GFCs). 15-1662 Page10-6 June 2017 Prepared by FCS Group Packet Pg. 143 8.A.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 10 1 FINANCIAL PLAN Customer Base Given that the City's customers can impose significantly different demands on the water system, the GFC calculation uses the concept of meter equivalents (MEs) to standardize the customer base. One ME represents the maximum continuous flow capacity of a defined "standard" meter (most often a 3/4" meter) — this analysis uses maximum continuous flow ratios published by the American Water Works Association (AWWA) to assign MEs to larger meters. The customer base is separated into two groups: existing customers and future growth. The existing customer base of 13,819 MEs is based on 2016 customer statistics provided by the City, excluding fire and sprinkler meters. The future customer base reflects the application of an annual growth rate of 0.50% to the existing ME count, resulting in a projected future customer base of 15,192 MEs by 2035. GFC Calculation The GFC calculation is based on an "average cost" methodology, which computes a charge per ME by dividing the allocable cost by the applicable number of MEs. Table 10-2 summarizes the updated GFC calculation. Table 10-2 General Facility Charge Calculation Usting Cost Basis Total PLANT -IN-SERVICE Utility Capital Assets as of 12/31/16 $ 37,415,792 less: Contributed Capital (1,097,505) plus: Intereston Non -Contributed Plant 12,267,235 less: Estimated Cost of Water Mains to be Replaced (1,320,547) less: Estimated Interest on Water Mains to be Replaced (832,403) plus: 2016 Construction -Work -in -Progress 346,578 less: Net Debt Principal Outstanding 7,527,487 TOTAL EXISTING COST BASIS $ 39,251,665 Future Cost Basis $ 57,425,247 Customer Base (excluding Fire & Sprinkler Meters) MEs Existing Equivalent Residential Units (Meter Equivalents) 13,819 Future Equivalent Residential Units (Incremental) 1,374 TOTAL CUSTOMER BASE 15,192 Resulting Charge Total Cost Basis $ 96,676,912 Total Customer Base 15,192 TOTAL GFC PER METER EQUIVALENT $ 6,364 Dividing the total cost basis of $96,676,912 by the projected 2035 customer base of 15,192 MEs generates a GFC of $6,364 per ME. This represents an increase of $1,314 over the City's current charge of $5,050 per ME. Since the calculated charges represent the 15-1662 Page 10-7 June 2017 Prepared by FCS Group Packet Pg. 144 8.A.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 10 1 FINANCIAL PLAN maximum allowable charge, the City may choose to implement a charge at any level up to the calculated charge. Revenues generated from the charge will vary depending on whether or not the full increase shown in Table 10-2 is implemented upfront or phased in over time. Delaying or otherwise limiting GFC increases will generally reduce the amount of revenue available for capital funding. GFC revenues were conservatively estimated at current charge levels for the following financial plan. Financial Plan The City of Edmonds' water utility operates as an enterprise fund, and is generally responsible to fully fund all of its needs without reliance on tax revenues or other General Fund resources. The primary source of funding for the utility is revenue from water service charges, which the City sets by ordinance and can adjust as needed to meet its objectives. The financial plan evaluates the City's ability to fund the water utility's CIP and other financial needs while maintaining affordable water rates. It is a comprehensive analysis that includes both operating and capital elements: • The revenue requirement analysis determines the amount of revenue necessary to fund the ongoing operation, maintenance, and administration of the utility on an annual basis, focusing specifically on the needs funded from operating revenues. It includes a framework of fiscal policies intended to promote long-term financial stability and viability. • The capital funding plan develops a funding strategy for the 2016 — 2022 CIP that considers rate revenues, existing reserves, GFCs, debt financing, and any other anticipated resources (e.g., grants, developer contributions, etc.). It can impact the revenue requirement analysis through use of debt financing (resulting in annual debt service) and capital funding embedded in rates. Financial Policies The ensuing discussion summarizes the key financial policies used in the revenue requirement analysis. Utility Reserves Reserves are a key component of any utility financial strategy, as they provide the flexibility to manage variations in costs and revenues that could otherwise have an adverse impact on ratepayers. For the purpose of rate and financial planning, resources are separated into the following funds: • Operating Fund: This fund provides an unrestricted fund balance to accommodate the short-term cycles of revenues and expenses. These reserves are intended to address variations in revenues and expenses, whether anticipated (e.g., billing/receipt cycles, 15-1662 Page 10-8 June 2017 Prepared by FCS Group Packet Pg. 145 8.A.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 10 1 FINANCIAL PLAN payroll cycles) or unanticipated (e.g., weather, economic conditions). Consistent with industry standards, the water utility maintains a balance equal to 45 — 60 days of operating expenses in this fund. Based on the City's 2016 Budget, this target range is approximately $488,000 — $651,000. 0 Capital Fund: This fund provides a source of cash for unanticipated capital expenditures such as emergency asset replacements or capital project overruns. In the context of the financial analysis, it also enforces an appropriate segregation of resources restricted (or otherwise designated) for capital purposes. Recognizing that the City can defer projects and/or issue debt in response to unanticipated capital costs, this fund does not have an explicit minimum balance target. • Bond Reserve: The City's bond covenants require that the City maintains a bond reserve based on the least of (1) maximum annual parity debt service, (2) 125% of average annual parity debt service, and (3) 10% of the original proceeds of the outstanding parity bonds. Based on the water utility's share of outstanding revenue bonds, its share of the bond reserve requirement is approximately $1.2 million. System Reinvestment The water system's infrastructure assets lose value over time due to routine wear and tear, representing a future replacement liability. The concept of system reinvestment funding entails funding this future replacement liability through a regular and predictable rate provision. Benchmarks for annual system reinvestment funding are often linked to depreciation expense as a readily available measure of the decline in asset value over time, but annual funding levels can also be set by policy. Given the City's preference to fund future capital needs on a "pay-as-you-go" (cash) basis, the financial plan assumes annual system reinvestment funding of $1.8 — $2.9 million during the study period. It is important to note that this policy does not guarantee full cash funding for all future capital needs, but it intends to provide the City with the financial flexibility to issue debt at its discretion. Financial Performance Standards The revenue requirement analysis uses a pair of sufficiency tests to establish the amount of revenue needed to meet the utility's financial obligations on an annual basis. • Cash Flow Test: To satisfy this test, the utility's operating revenues must be adequate to fund all known cash requirements including O&M expenses, debt service payments, system reinvestment funding (and other rate -funded capital outlays), and reserve funding. 0 Coverage Test: Intended to ensure compliance with the City's bond covenants, satisfying this test requires that net revenue is greater than or equal to 1.25 times annual parity debt service. The annual revenue requirement is broadly defined as the amount of revenue needed to satisfy both of these tests. Short-term cash flow deficits may occur as part of a strategy to 15-1662 Page 10-9 June 2017 Prepared by FCS Group Packet Pg. 146 8.A.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 10 1 FINANCIAL PLAN phase rate increases in, as long as the utility has sufficient reserves on hand to absorb them. The financial plan assumes that the debt service coverage requirement must always be met. Capital Funding Plan The CIP developed for this plan totals $18.9 million ($21.5 million inflated) over the 2017- 2022 planning horizon. Costs are stated in 2016 dollars and escalated to the year of planned spending for financing projections at an annual inflation rate of 4%. Table 10-3 summarizes the annual CIP expenditures in 2016 and inflated dollars. Table 10-3 Water Utility Capital Improvement Program Water CI P S umma Year 2016 $ 1 nflated $ 2017 $ 3,865,990 $ 4,020,630 2018 $ 3,941,541 $ 4,263,171 2019 $ 2,248,489 $ 2,529,244 2020 $ 2,960,577 $ 3,463,456 2021 $ 2,960,577 $ 3,601,994 2022 $ 2,960,577 $ 3,746,073 2017-2022 Total $18,937,750 $ 21,624,568 2023 - 2035 $ 38,487,497 $ 43,534,263 2017-2035 Total $ 57,425,247 $ 65,158,830 A capital funding plan is developed to determine the total resources available to meet the CIP needs and determine if new debt financing will be required. The water utility began 2017 with approximately $10.1 million — netting out $1.2 million restricted for debt service and $651,000 set aside for the Operating Fund leaves approximately $8.3 million available for capital investment. GFC revenue collections are estimated to contribute, on average, $340,000 per year from 2017 to 2022. All capital expenditures are expected to be funded directly through cash resources without any reliance on debt. The capital funding plan is summarized in Table 10-4 below. Table 10-4 2016-2022 Annual Capital Fund Cash Flow Capital Financing Plan 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Beginning Balance $ 8,292,398 $ 6,799,043 $ 5,313,446 $ 6,058,853 $ 5,945,095 $ 5,807,492 plus: Interest Earnings 20,731 33,995 39,851 45,441 44,588 43,556 plus: Interfund Transfers from Funds 422/423 200,000 - - - - - plus: General Facilities Charges 340,955 342,660 344,373 346,095 347,826 349,565 plus: Capital Funding from Rates 1,965,589 2,400,918 2,890,427 2,958,162 3,071,977 3,206,173 less: Capital Expenditures (4,020,630) (4,263,171) (2,529,244) (3,463,456) (3,601,994) (3,746,073) Ending Balance $ 6,799,043 $ 5,313,446 $ 6,058,853 $ 5,945,095 $ 5,807,492 $ 5,660,713 15-1662 Page 10-10 June 2017 Prepared by FCS Group Packet Pg. 147 8.A.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 10 1 FINANCIAL PLAN The CIP costs shown in the table are inflated to the year of spending. Table 10-4 shows $16.5 million in capital funding from rates from 2017 — 2022 (through a combination of system reinvestment and Operating Fund transfers), which represents approximately 67.0% of the projected capital costs. The remainder is expected to be funded through a combination of existing cash balances, interest earnings, and GFC revenues. Revenue Requirement The revenue requirement analysis enables the City to set utility rate structures which fully recover the total cost of operating the system. Capital improvement and replacement, operations and maintenance (O&M) expenses, general administration, fiscal policy attainment, cash reserve management, and debt repayment all come together to form the basis for the revenue requirement. The revenue needed to satisfy all the utility financial obligations is then compared to the revenue derived from the current level of rates to determine sufficiency. Projected Financial Performance The revenue requirement analysis is based on the following assumptions: • The 2016 budget forms the baseline for the forecast of revenues and expenses. • Rate revenues under existing rates are forecast to increase with customer growth, which is projected to be approximately 0.5% per year. • Most operating expenses are escalated annually at 3.0% for general cost inflation. Employee benefit costs are escalated at 10.0% per year to recognize recent and expected increases in those costs. • Per City staff s direction, Alderwood Water and Wastewater District water rates are assumed to increase annually per the following schedule: 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 5.5% 5.6% 3.9% 4.2% 9.9% 3.1% 5.3% 0 GFC revenues are assumed at an average annual amount of $340,000 per year throughout the study period. 0 The City's annual fund interest earnings rate is assumed to be 0.25% in 2016 and 2017, 0.50% in 2018 and increasing to 0.75% thereafter. Table 10-5 summarizes the projected financial performance and rate revenue requirements of the water utility for 2016 through 2022 based upon the above assumptions. 15-1662 Page10-11 June 2017 Prepared by FCS Group Packet Pg. 148 8.A.a of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 10 1 FINANCIAL PLAN Table 10-5 Summary of Projected Financial Performance & Revenue Requirements Revenue Requirements 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Revenue Rate Revenues at 2016 Rates $ 6,755,358 $ 6,792,000 $ 6,828,911 $ 6,866,095 $ 6,903,556 $ 6,808,446 $ 6,842,488 Non -Rate Revenues 124,950 109,579 114,349 119,236 119,441 119,786 119,987 Total Revenue $ 6,880,308 $ 6,901,579 $ 6,943,260 $ 6,985,331 $ 7,022,997 $ 6,928,232 $ 6,962,475 Expenses Cash Operating Expenses $3,959,820 $4,131,337 $4,283,873 $ 4,450,177 $ 4,730,105 $ 4,893,233 $ 5,119,811 Debt Service 1,248,072 1,252,624 1,254,168 1,256,540 1,258,950 1,254,358 1,254,742 System Reinvestment - 1,800,000 2,000,000 2,300,000 2,500,000 2,700,000 2,900,000 Total Expenses $ 5,207,892 $ 7,183,961 $ 7,538,041 $ 8,006,717 $ 8,489,054 $ 8,847,591 $ 9,274,553 Net Cash Flow $1,672,416 $ (282,383) $ (594,782) $ (1,021,386) $ (1,466,057) $ (1,919,359) $ (2,312,078) Annual Rate Adjustment 9.00% 9.00% 9.00% 4.00% 4.00% 4.00% After Rate Increases: Rate Revenues $6,755,358 $7,403,280 $8,113,429 $ 8,891,792 $ 9,297,918 $ 9,536,613 $ 9,967,668 Net Cash Flow $1,672,416 $ 193,784 $ 425,992 $ 617,764 $ 504,178 $ 398,792 $ 343,419 Debt Service Coverage 2.40 2.67 3.03 3.44 3.51 3.59 3.71 As shown in Table 10-5, projected revenues under the existing (2016) rates are insufficient to fund projected rate needs, primarily due to the level of rate -funded system reinvestment needed to fund the capital improvement program. The proposed rate strategy envisions 9.0% annual rate increases from 2017 — 2019 and 4.0% annual increases thereafter. It is important to note that these projections are based upon current assumptions and the capital program identified herein. Circumstances might change over time, causing actual rate adjustments to be higher or lower once actual costs are known. It would be prudent for the City to monitor the water utility's financial status regularly, revisiting the analysis in the event of any significant changes. Current and Projected Rates Existing Rates The City's existing water rate structure has two components; a bimonthly base charge and a uniform volume charge. Residential and multi -family customers pay the base charge on each dwelling unit, while other customers' base charges vary by meter size. All customers pay the same volume rate per hundred cubic feet (ccf) of water consumption. The City's current rate structure is presented in Table 10-6. In order to enhance conservation signals to water customers, the City might consider transitioning to an increasing block rate structure for single-family residential customers, and differentiate volume rates among the customer classes. Other potential options for enhancing 15-1662 Page 10-12 June 2017 Prepared by FCS Group Packet Pg. 149 8.A.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 10 1 FINANCIAL PLAN conservation signals would be designating irrigation customers (if there are any) as a separate customer class, and considering implementing seasonal rates for customer classes with seasonal usage patterns. It should be noted that such changes in the rate structure require a more comprehensive and detailed rate and cost of service analyses, which the City may consider in the future. Projected Rates Table 10-6 presents the City's water rate schedule, incorporating the rate adjustments shown in Table 10-5. It reflects an across-the-board application of the recommended rate adjustments. The City Council adopted the 2017 - 2019 rate increases; the 2020 - 2022 rates are shown for planning purposes only. The City plans to revisit the water rate analysis prior to adjusting rates in 2020. Table 10-6 Water Rate Forecast Water Rate Schedule 2016 Adopted 2017 2018 2019 2020 Projected 2021 2022 Annual Rate Increase 0.00% 9.00% 9.00% 9.00% 4.00% 4.00% 4.00% Bimonthly Base Rates Residential (per Unit) Single -Family $28.68 $31.26 $34.07 $37.14 $38.63 $40.17 $41.78 Multi -Family $25.26 $27.53 $30.01 $32.71 $34.02 $35.38 $36.79 All Other Customers: 3/4" Meter $34.68 $37.80 $41.20 $44.91 $46.71 $48.57 $50.52 1" Meter $70.60 $76.95 $83.88 $91.43 $95.09 $98.89 $102.85 1-1/2" Meter $130.55 $142.30 $155.11 $169.07 $175.83 $182.87 $190.18 2" Meter $199.04 $216.95 $236.48 $257.76 $268.07 $278.79 $289.94 3" Meter $429.38 $468.02 $510.15 $556.06 $578.30 $601.43 $625.49 4" Meter $608.22 $662.96 $722.63 $787.66 $819.17 $851.93 $886.01 6" Meter $1,233.55 $1,344.57 $1,465.58 $1,597.48 $1,661.38 $1,727.83 $1,796.95 Variable Rates All Customers (per ccf) $2.99 $3.26 $3.55 $3.87 $4.02 $4.19 $4.35 Attordanility The Washington State Department of Health and the State Public Works Board have historically used an affordability index to prioritize low-cost loan awards. The typical threshold looks at whether a system's rates exceed 1.5% to 2.0% of the median household income for the demographic area. As a result, if monthly bills are less than 1.5% of the median household income for the demographic area, they are generally considered affordable. The median household income for the City of Edmonds in the 2015 census was $75,044. The 2015 census figure was escalated to 2016 using the U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau 15-1662 Page 10-13 June 2017 Prepared by FCS Group Packet Pg. 150 8.A.a City of Edmonds I Comprehensive Water System Plan CHAPTER 10 1 FINANCIAL PLAN of Labor Statistics Consumer Price Index (CPI) Calculator. Future years are escalated at 3.0% per year. Table 10-7 presents the City's rates with the projected rate increases annually for the forecast period (using single-family residential rates and assuming 8 ccf of water usage bimonthly water consumption assumption), tested against the 2% threshold. Table 10-7 Affordability Test Affordability Analysis 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Bimonthly Single -Family Bill @ 16 ccf(1) $90.83 $97.66 $104.96 $112.98 $116.09 $117.86 $122.57 Median Household Income (2) $75,991 $78,270 $80,619 $83,037 $85,528 $88,094 $90,737 Annual Single -Family Bill as %of MHI 0.72% 0.75% 0.78% 0.82% 0.81% 0.80% 0.81% (1) City Utility Tax Rate 18.70% 17.07% 15.50% 14.05% 12.68% 10.00% 10.00% (2) Median Income Data: US Census Bureau, 2015 ACS 5-year estimate adjusted by 3.0% per year Table 10-7 indicates that the City's rates are forecasted to remain well within the stated affordability threshold (2.0% of median household income) throughout the projection period. Note that the forecast of customer bills reflects a planned reduction in the City's utility tax rate from 18.7% to 10.0% over a five-year period. Conclusion The revenue requirement analysis indicates that the City needs to increase its water rates to fund the water utility's financial obligations, particularly capital investment. The rate strategy increases rates by 9.0% per year from 2017 — 2019, followed by recommended 4.0% annual increases from 2020 — 2022. Even with these increases, the City's water rates are expected to remain "affordable" as defined by industry standards. It is recommended that the City regularly monitor the financial position of the water utility, revisiting the key underlying assumptions to ensure that the utility's revenues remain adequate to meet its financial obligations. 15-1662 Page10-14 June 2017 Prepared by FCS Group Packet Pg. 151 8.A.a C N t v APPENDIX A Packet Pg. 152 8.A.a E a� THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK L .N C d L L Q O U r O N O C O O C N N d L Q. Q Packet Pg. 153 8.A.a ORIGIN WHOLESALE WATER SUPPLY AGREEMENT Between Alderwood Water & Wastewater District and City of Edmonds a2 E Table of Contents SECTION I. - WATER SUPPLY........................................................................................... 2 CU SECTION II. - DEFINITIONS.............................................................................................. 3 a� SECTION III. - FUTURE FACILITY ACQUISITIONS.................................................. 5 c a� a� L SECTION IV. - CONTINUITY OF SERVICE.................................................................... 7 E SECTION V. - OPERATIONAL EFFICIENCY................................................................. 8 ° ti SECTION VI. - WHOLESALE COMMITTEE.................................................................. 9 0 N SECTION VII. - MASTER METER................................................................................... 10 4- ° SECTION VIII. - AREA OF USE........................................................................................ 11 c ° r 2 SECTION IX. - WATER QUALITY................................................................................... 11 = a� SECTION X. - SUPPLY TO DISTRICT -OWNED SERVICES TRANSMITTED L THROUGH CUSTOMER MAINS............................................................ 11 a SECTION XI. - WHOLESALE WATER RATE............................................................... 12 ti T" N SECTION XII. - BILLING & PAYMENT......................................................................... 16 SECTION XIII. - TERM & EXPIRATION 16 a) > ....................................................................... a� SECTION XIV. - NOTICE OF NEGOTIATION............................................................. 17 >, SECTION XV. - FORCE MAJEURE AND CHANGES IN LAW .................................. 17 SECTION XVI. - LEGAL RELATIONS............................................................................ 17 a ti SECTION XVII. - DISPUTE RESOLUTION................................................................... 18 N SECTION XVIII. GOVERNING LAW AND VENUE 19 a� SECTION IXX. - NO THIRD PARTY BENEFICIARIES .............................................. 19 SECTION XX. - LIMITATION ON DAMAGES .............................................................. 19 a E SECTION XXI. - GENERAL PROVISIONS ° EXHIBIT A — QUANTITY OF WATER TO BE PURCHASED ................................... 23 `n a� EXHIBIT B - WHOLESALE FACILITIES..................................................................... 24 r EXHIBIT C - REGIONAL FACILITIES 25 ......................................................................... ° EXHIBIT D — CUSTOMERS WATER SERVICE AGREEMENT TO OTHER E SUPPLIERS................................................................................................26 w r EXHIBIT E — MASTER METER LOCATION............................................................... 27 c E S/6-'l� its C..0N-5,-;? / a WHOLESALE WATER SUPPLY AGREEMENT 7 Alderwood Water & Wastewater District / City of Edmonds pg. 1 Packet Pg. 154 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 AGREEMENT BETWEEN ALDERWOOD WATER & WASTEWATER DISTRICT AND CITY OF EDMONDS FOR WATER SUPPLY This Wholesale Water Supply Agreement ("Agreement") between the ALDERWOOD WATER & WASTEWATER DISTRICT, a special purpose municipal corporation (the "District,") and CITY OF EDMONDS (the "Customer") (individually a "Parry" and collectively the "Parties") for the purposes set forth herein. WHEREAS, the District and the Customer are each authorized under the law of the State of Washington to supply potable water to their retail customers and to enter into wholesale contracts for the purchase and sale of wholesale water supply; and WHEREAS, the District and the Customer desire to enter into an agreement wherein the District sells wholesale water to the Customer at a wholesale water rate that will adequately compensate the District for those current and future costs attributable to supplying wholesale water to the Customer; NOW, THEREFORE, The District and the Customer agree as follows: SECTION I. - WATER SUPPLY The District agrees to sell to the Customer and the Customer agrees to purchase from the District up to the daily quantity of water shown in Exhibit "A" according to the terms and conditions of this Agreement. The water shall be delivered to a Master Meter at a point in or immediately adjacent to a site as depicted on Exhibit B and E. The District shall be the Customer's primary source of water; provided that the Customer may use any existing alternate source connections and re -use water as sources of water supply. WHOLESALE WATER SUPPLY AGREEMENT Alderwood Water & Wastewater District / City of Edmonds Pg. 2 Packet Pg. 155 8.A.a 32 SECTION II. - DEFINITIONS 33 a 34 As used in this Agreement, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise, the E a� 35 following words and phrases shall mean: 36 "Administrative Time" means the District's administrative costs incurred to; CU 37 maintain, operate and repair the Wholesale Facilities. a� 38 Cubic Foot" means a unit of measurement of water equal to 7.48 gallons. The term "CCF" a� 39 shall mean 100 cubic feet of water. L Q 40 "Distribution Main means any water main owned and operated by either the District or by the o U 41 Customer as part of its Retail Water System. ti r CN O 42 "District Peak Day Water" means the 24-hour maximum usage day measured in million 0 43 gallons pumped from the Everett System through the three pump stations operated by the o .2 44 District. 2 a� 45 "Everett Supply Contract" means the current agreement between the City of Everett and the L a 46 District for water supply, dated January 28, 2005, and any future amendments thereof. ti to 47 Master Meter" means the measuring device installed to measure the volume of water 48 supplied to the Customer by the District. 49 "Peak Day Water" means the 24-hour maximum usage day measured in million gallons W 50 during a calendar year. 51 "Regional Facilities" means District assets as identified on Exhibit C that are necessary to 52 provide service to all District retail and wholesale customers. 53 "Retail Water System means that system owned and operated by the District or by the 54 Customer composed of Distribution Mains and appurtenances used for receiving a supply of 55 water and distributing it directly to the District's or the Customer's retail customers. 56 "Service Connections means those separate connections between a Retail Water System 57 and a retail customer. 58 Service Meters means the meter or measuring device installed on a service line or Service 59 Connection for the purpose of measuring the volume of water supplied to a retail customer. 60 "Terminal Storage Reservoir" means a storage reservoir used primarily to provide 61 reserves against transmission failure from the supply, supply or pumping failure, pump control 62 storage to balance and economically operate the supply pumps and which permits a reduced 63 sizing in the supply transmission and pumping system to the terminal storage reservoirs. WHOLESALE WATER SUPPLY AGREEMENT Alderwood Water & Wastewater District / City of Edmonds pg. 3 Packet Pg. 156 8.A.a 64 Transmission Main means a pipe owned and operated by the District primarily used for 65 carrying water from a source (currently the Everett Water System) to a Retail Water System that 66 normally has limited or no Service Connections. 67 "Wholesale Customer" means a customer who purchases water from the District 68 according to the terms and conditions of this Agreement or an agreement with substantially 69 similar terms and conditions, delivered through the Wholesale Facilities. 70 "Wholesale Facilities" means current assets, identified on Exhibit B, and future assets 71 hereafter added to an amended Exhibit B, owned and operated by the District that are necessary 72 to supply water to the Wholesale Customers in this Agreement. These Wholesale Facilities may 73 also be part of the Regional Facilities. 74 "Wholesale Water Cost" means all of the costs incurred by the District to supply water to 75 Wholesale Customers, including 76 (1) The cost of purchased water, which is the annual amount (U.S dollars) paid by the 77 District for water supplied to the Wholesale Customers under either the Everett 78 Supply Contract or any other agreement for the purchase of water to supply the 79 Wholesale Customers. 80 (2) Maintenance and operation costs ("Wholesale M&O costs"), which are costs 81 incurred by the District to maintain, operate and repair the Wholesale Facilities, 82 including Administrative Time, cost of materials and supplies, and the full cost of 83 labor attributable to serving the Wholesale Customers. 84 (3) "Power Costs," which are the electrical and other fuel charges associated with 85 operating the Wholesale Facilities. 86 (4) "Existing Wholesale Debt, (Principal + Interest) which is the existing bonded 87 debt service and debt obligations of the District attributable to serving the 88 Wholesale Customers, including principal and interest payments. 89 (5) "Future Wholesale Debt Service," (Principal + Interest), which is future debt 90 issued by the District to finance capital improvements and infrastructure, 91 attributable to serving the Wholesale Customers, including principal and interest 92 payments. 93 (6) "Cash (Rate) Funded Wholesale Facility Improvements," ("CFI") which is that 94 revenue component of the Wholesale Water Rate used, in whole or in part, to cash WHOLESALE WATER SUPPLY AGREEMENT Alderwood Water & Wastewater District / City of Edmonds pg. 4 Packet Pg. 157 8.A.a 95 fund Wholesale Facilities. 96 (7) "Other Program Funding," which includes costs incurred by the District that 97 benefit Wholesale Customers but are not otherwise included in the Wholesale 98 Water Rate. 99 (8) "Quantity of Water Supplied," which is the prior year's total of water supplied to 100 the Wholesale Customers (CCF) as measured by all Master Meters, plus or minus 101 any adjustments for individual services of the Customer or District connected 102 upstream or downstream, respectively, of the Master Meters. 103 (9) "District Finance Option," which is a revenue component of the Wholesale Water 104 Rate used in whole or in part to fund capital improvements where bonds or CFI 105 are impractical or are not available. 106 "Wholesale Water Rate" means the cost of water to the Wholesale Customer in dollars 107 per hundred cubic feet (CCF). 108 "Wholesale Water System" includes the Wholesale Facilities and the Retail Water 109 System of any Wholesale Customer and of the District. 110 III SECTION III. - FUTURE FACILITY ACQUISITIONS 112 113 The Customer and the District agree that at such times in the future that the Customer 114 extends its corporate boundaries to include parts of the District's service area, the Parties will 115 benefit from having a process in place to determine what will become the property of the 116 Customer and what will remain the property of the District. Recognizing that Chapter 35.13A 117 RCW is the governing basis for such a process, the fact that the District provides service to seven 118 cities and the county's unincorporated area adds complexity to the process which requires more 119 process detail to insure that both the Customer and the District can fulfill their respective 120 obligations for service. Therefore, the following process shall define the requirements and 121 responsibilities of each party. 122 The Parties agree that the facilities and infrastructure that are necessary for supporting the 123 District's regional customers ("Regional Facilities") are identified herein. In areas proposed for 124 annexation, where the potential exists for the transfer of ownership of any portion of the 125 Regional Facilities, it is agreed that the Regional Facilities shall remain in the ownership and WHOLESALE WATER SUPPLY AGREEMENT Alderwood Water & Wastewater District / City of Edmonds pg. 5 Packet Pg. 158 8.A.a 126 control of the District. Nothing herein shall be interpreted to waive any right or obligation under 127 Washington law as the same exists or shall hereinafter be created. 128 If the Customer initiates the process to consider annexation of additional areas that are 129 located within the District, the Customer will notify the District in writing of its intent. After 130 receiving Customer's notice of intent to annex, representatives of the Customer and the District 131 shall meet at a mutually agreeable time and place to review the proposed annexation area with 132 regard to its potential impact on water and sewer service. Discussions between the Customer and 133 the District shall include a preliminary assessment of service continuing with the District and/or 134 the potential of facility transfer to the Customer. The preliminary assessment should include a 135 review of the extent of modifications that would be required to transfer the utilities to the 136 Customer, including the possibility for relocation of master meters and realignment of existing 137 distribution utilities. 138 Within 30 days following the initial meetings and completion of the preliminary 139 assessment of utility options, the Customer agrees to notify the District in writing of its intent 140 regarding which Party should be the service provider to the proposed annexation area. 141 If the Customer provides notice of its intent to further consider Customer ownership of 142 certain utilities owned by the District within the proposed annexation area, the Customer and the 143 District may agree to participate in a more detailed study in order to determine the extent of 144 facility modifications and costs impacts associated with the transfer of the utilities in the annexed 145 areas. The cost of any such study shall be split equally between the Parties. 146 After the Parties' review and analysis of the additional data provided by the detailed 147 study, if the Customer notifies the District in writing of its decision to assume ownership of the 148 utilities, a plan will be developed jointly for defining the steps necessary to complete the transfer 149 of ownership. The plan will include design and specifications for any required infrastructure 150 improvements, transfer of accounts, and final agreements on costs involved including costs 151 related to outstanding bond indebtedness. The costs associated with the preparation of this plan 152 shall be split equally between the Parties. 153 Once the plan (including the allocation of construction costs between the Parties) has 154 been agreed to by the Customer and the District, the District will prepare the final contract plans 155 and specifications for the required improvements, and will administer the contract for the 156 construction. WHOLESALE WATER SUPPLY AGREEMENT Alderwood Water & Wastewater District / City of Edmonds pg. 6 Packet Pg. 159 8.A.a 157 158 159 Upon completion of the required improvements and payment to the District of agreed costs associated with the assumption of the utilities, including all associated construction costs, the District will transfer accounts, assign any existing easements, and provide the necessary bills 160 of sale for the transferred utilities. 161 The parties agree that the contract may be reopened if the assumption will affect rates. If 162 the process leads to facility assumption, the parties agree that the District would be provided 163 three (3) years to make the changes necessary to allow for transitional impact adjustments by the 164 District. 165 In the event the Parties are not able to agree on the plan, the amounts to be paid by the 166 Customer for the transfer of facilities, or any other disputes relating to the Customer's 167 acquisition of the District's facilities, the matter shall be referred to mediation for resolution in 168 accordance with Section XVII (Dispute Resolution). If the matter is not resolved through 169 mediation, the Parties shall proceed in accordance with the dispute resolution procedures set 170 forth in Section XVII. 171 172 SECTION IV. - CONTINUITY OF SERVICE 173 174 Except as otherwise provided, the District's supply of water to the Customer shall be 175 continuous. In the event of a general emergency or water shortage affecting the District, the 176 District and the Customer shall implement necessary water conservation measures. Because 177 the District and the Customer have critical customers, the District shall consult with the 178 Customer regarding water allocations. General restrictions placed upon deliveries to the 179 Customer shall be made according to the District's most recent Emergency/Drought 180 Response Plan. In the event of localized emergency problems, temporary service 181 interruptions may result. 182 The District may have to implement emergency Wholesale Water System 183 conservation measures to meet an emergency condition. The Customer shall assist and 184 support such emergency conservation measures. 185 If the District determines that interruptions and reductions are necessary or reasonable in 186 case of system emergencies, the District shall provide oral notice to the Customer and may 187 temporarily interrupt or reduce deliveries of water to the Customer. Except in cases of WHOLESALE WATER SUPPLY AGREEMENT Alderwood Water & Wastewater District / City of Edmonds pg. 7 Packet Pg. 160 8.A.a 188 emergency, and to avoid unreasonable interference with the Customer's operations, the District 189 shall give the Customer at least fourteen (14) calendar days notice of any proposed interruptions 190 or reduction in service, the reason therefore, and the probable duration thereof, including any 191 interruptions or reduction in services that will be caused by the installation of equipment, repairs, 192 replacements, investigations, inspections or other maintenance performed by the District on its 193 water system or those parts of the system supplying the Customer. 194 The City of Everett currently holds water rights regulated by the State Department 195 of Ecology and an approved Water System Plan regulated by the State Department of 196 Health that enables the City of Everett to perform the Everett Supply Contract. Said water 197 rights and plan currently authorize the District to supply City of Everett water to Customer 198 under this Agreement and consistent with the terms of the Everett Supply Contract. 199 Customer acknowledges and agrees that any interruption or restriction of said authorization 200 could result in the curtailment, interruption or reduction in the District's service to 201 Customer, the declaration of an emergency, or other measures reasonable under the 202 circumstances. 203 In the event of any of the foregoing or otherwise, the District shall have no 204 obligation whatsoever to obtain and furnish a substitute supply of water and Customer may 205 obtain and use any alternate lawful source of water supply including re -use water as 206 substitute water supply. The District shall cooperate with the Customer and use its best 207 efforts to assist Customer in obtaining an alternative source(s) of water supply. Nothing 208 herein shall be interpreted to waive any right or obligation under Washington law as the 209 same exists or shall hereinafter be created. 210 211 SECTION V. - OPERATIONAL EFFICIENCY 212 213 The Everett Supply Contract includes a rate component of peak to average day flow 214 that affects the District and the Customer. Therefore, as a material element of this 215 Agreement, the Customer shall track during the high water demand period June through 216 August the operational control components of its Retail Water System, including, at a 217 minimum, reservoir storage capacity and flow controls, and provide the data collected to 218 the District in accordance with procedures and on a schedule as established by the WHOLESALE WATER SUPPLY AGREEMENT Alderwood Water & Wastewater District / City of Edmonds pg. 8 Packet Pg. 161 8.A.a 219 Wholesale Committee. 220 221 SECTION VI. - WHOLESALE COMMITTEE 222 223 The District shall establish and staff, and the Customer shall participate in, a wholesale 224 committee ("Wholesale Committee") composed of the District and each Wholesale Customer. 225 Each Wholesale Customer shall designate in writing a representative to serve on the Wholesale 226 Committee. A representative may be replaced by a written designation of the committee 227 member. The Wholesale Committee shall have the powers and authority as set forth below: 228 1. Advisory Powers and Authority. The Wholesale Committee shall review and advise 229 the District on the following topics or issues: 230 a. Proposed wholesale rate changes, including Administrative Time; 231 b. Proposed multi -year wholesale capital improvement plans; 232 c. Coordination with the District on day-to-day operations relating to high water 233 demand; 234 d. Proposed bond issues for wholesale system capital improvements; 235 e. Changes in District standards that would apply to wholesale improvements; 236 f. Proposed modifications to the Everett Supply Contract; 237 g. Proposed regulatory changes that could potentially impact wholesale customers; 238 h. Day-to-day operational issues and coordination efforts; and 239 i. District Finance Option 240 241 2. Approval Powers and Authority. The Wholesale Committee shall review and approve 242 of the following topics: 243 a. The District's Emergency/Drought Response Plan; 244 b. Limits on cash funded wholesale system capital improvements; and 245 c. "Other Program Funding" as defined and used in this Agreement. 246 Approval will require a majority vote of the Wholesale Customers plus District. 247 The Wholesale Committee shall meet annually by the 15t' of March to review the 248 proposed wholesale rates and, as necessary, to address the other topics as outlined above. A 249 meeting may be called by any member of the Wholesale Committee. The Wholesale WHOLESALE WATER SUPPLY AGREEMENT Alderwood Water & Wastewater District / City of Edmonds pg. 9 Packet Pg. 162 8.A.a 250 Committee shall evaluate each Wholesale Customer's operational efficiency by the end of each 251 year and provide a report and recommendation to the District's Board of Commissioners on the 252 summarized data of the Wholesale Customers' tracking of high water demand to identify 253 potential efficiency measures to be implemented under the state -mandated Water Use 254 Efficiency Rule. Each Wholesale Customer shall receive a copy of the report. 255 256 SECTION VII. - MASTER METER 257 258 All water delivered by the District to Customer shall be measured by a Master 259 Meter. All Master Meters, including vaults and appurtenances, will be owned, maintained, 260 repaired, replaced and upgraded by the District and the cost thereof included in the 261 Wholesale Water Cost. The District shall own all facilities from the connection to the 262 District pipeline to the upstream flange of the valve downstream of the Master Meter. The 263 cost of a new Master Meter requested by the Customer, including appurtenances and 264 installation, shall be paid by the Customer. Relocation of a Master Meter necessitated by 265 the Customer shall be paid by the Customer. 266 The District shall establish standards for Master Meters, including appurtenances 267 and access to flow data. Access to the Master Meter and the flow records shall be made 268 available to the Customer upon request. The Master Meter shall be checked by the District 269 on a schedule and for accuracy per the manufacturer's recommendation and the cost thereof 270 included in the Wholesale Water Cost. Either the District or the Customer may request 271 additional tests. The costs of additional tests shall borne equally, if both Parties agree to 272 the test; otherwise, by the Party requesting the test, unless the meter is not performing 273 within the manufacturer's specification, whereupon the benefited Party shall pay for the 274 test. Any adjustment to charges for water supplied shall be determined by the average water 275 use of the three prior years for the same period, unless some other method is agreed upon. 276 Either a credit or an additional billing calculated at the applicable Wholesale Water Rate 277 shall accrue to the appropriate party. If review of the meter records does not establish when 278 the change in accuracy occurred, the period of adjustment shall be one-half of the period 279 since the last meter calibration, not to exceed 12 months. 280 WHOLESALE WATER SUPPLY AGREEMENT Alderwood Water & Wastewater District / City of Edmonds pg. 10 Packet Pg. 163 8.A.a 281 SECTION VIII. - AREA OF USE F 282 a 283 The Customer shall not furnish service under any terms to services or systems other than 284 those within its approved service area as defined within its Water Comprehensive Plan without 285 first receiving written approval of the District. The Customer currently serves other water L 286 suppliers or the service area of such suppliers by agreement. Those agreements are identified on .N 287 Exhibit D and continued service to those suppliers is hereby approved by District. a� 288 a E 289 SECTION IX. - WATER QUALITY 290 ti 0 N 291 The water delivered by the District to the Master Meter shall comply with state and o 292 federal standards for drinking water and be of the same standard and quality normally c ° 293 delivered to the District's other customers. The District shall not be liable for any a a� 294 degradation of water quality and resulting damages that may occur beyond the Master a 295 Meter, including liability for acts of sabotage. Customer shall operate its system in to 296 conformance with law and in a manner which does not impair the water quality of the N 297 "Wholesale Water System." 298 299 SECTION X. - SUPPLY TO DISTRICT -OWNED SERVICES TRANSMITTED 300 THROUGH CUSTOMER MAINS a 301 ti 0 N 302 The District shall have the right to continue to serve its Retail Water System with 303 water transmitted through the Customer's Master Meter and Retail Water System. Every 304 two months, the District shall read meters in that portion of the District's Retail Water a 305 System supplied through Customer's Master Meter and Retail Water System. The volume 306 of water shown by meter reading shall be deducted from the total Master Meter reading for 307 the month in which these meters are read, plus 25% added for meter losses, flushing, leakage 308 and other authorized unmetered usage. 309 310 311 312 WHOLESALE WATER SUPPLY AGREEMENT Alderwood Water & Wastewater District / City of Edmonds pg. 11 Packet Pg. 164 8.A.a 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 SECTION XI. - WHOLESALE WATER RATE Wholesale Customers shall pay a Wholesale Water Rate that shall be adjusted annually on April 1 and shall be effective on that date. The Wholesale Water Rate shall recover the District's Wholesale Water Cost computed by the following formula: R=E+M+P+(ED+FD)+CFI+DFO+O Q Where: R = Wholesale Water Rate ($/CCF) computed to the nearest ten -thousandth of a dollar E = The District's cost of Purchased Water ($/CCF) M = Wholesale M&O Costs for the prior calendar year, excluding Power Costs P = Power Costs for the prior calendar year [Wholesale -Related Portion Only] ED = Existing Wholesale Debt including Principal + Interest FD = Future Wholesale Debt Service including Principal + Interest CFI = Cash (Rate) Funded Wholesale Facility Improvements DFO = District Finance Option O = Other Program Funding as may be deemed appropriate by the Wholesale Committee Q = Quantity of Water Supplied (CCF) in the prior calendar year measured by the Wholesale Customers' Master Meters In determining the Wholesale Water Rate, the District shall be governed by the following principles: 1. Revenue recovery for debt service shall be based upon the debt service (payment) schedule associated with each debt issue. Whenever the District issues re- funding debt, it shall analyze the refunding issue to determine an equitable allocation of principal and interest to the Wholesale Water Rate. The Wholesale Committee shall be convened to review the allocation for either a new debt issue or a refunding issue. WHOLESALE WATER SUPPLY AGREEMENT Alderwood Water & Wastewater District / City of Edmonds Pg. 12 Packet Pg. 165 8.A.a 344 345 2. In the year in which the District proposes to issue a new long-term debt c a 346 instrument to finance, in whole or in part, the construction of or improvements to 347 Wholesale Facilities, the cost attributable to Wholesale Facilities, including projected cn 348 principal, interest, reserve payments, and debt service, incurred by the District for that L 349 year shall be included in the Wholesale Water Rate. The cost of such debt shall be 350 allocated to the Wholesale Customers, over the life of the debt issue, according to the .N 351 specific use of proceeds from that debt issuance. At the end of the year, and after the t a 352 debt has been issued, the debt issue is considered "Existing Wholesale Debt" for purposes E 0 353 of establishing wholesale water rates in subsequent years. c N 354 0 355 3. Whenever financially feasible, debt service coverage shall be met by the c ° 2 356 District's overall financial operations (retail and wholesale). If debt service coverage 357 cannot be met by the District's overall financial operations, then the Wholesale Water a 358 Rate shall be adjusted to include a component sufficient to meet the specific debt service to 359 coverage covenants. 3 360 361 4. Every fifth (5) year commencing in the year 2015, the District shall re- a� 362 determine Wholesale M&O Costs for the purpose of setting the Wholesale Water Rate 363 for that year. In each of the subsequent four years, the Wholesale M&O Cost (M) shall ti 364 be escalated by the consumer price index for all Urban Consumers (CPI-U) 0 N 365 (Seattle/Tacoma/Bremerton metropolitan area) December to December or a comparable a� c 366 index, if that index is unavailable; provided that in any year, the District may, at its c a 367 discretion, forego escalation of cost according to the index and determine the actual r 368 Wholesale M&O Costs that year. cn 369 L r 370 5. Power Costs attributable to the Wholesale Customers shall be determined 371 when the Wholesale Water Rate is re -calculated and shall be equal to the following: 372 P = (District's prior calendar year cost of power at Wholesale Facilities identified on 373 Exhibit B, and as Exhibit B may be amended) times (the Wholesale Customers' 374 combined prior calendar year volumetric use of water as recorded on Master Meters WHOLESALE WATER SUPPLY AGREEMENT Alderwood Water & Wastewater District / City of Edmonds pg. 13 Packet Pg. 166 8.A.a 375 identified on Exhibit B, and as Exhibit B may be amended) divided by (the District's 376 prior calendar year volumetric use of water as recorded at the District's Master Maters at 377 the Evergreen Way Pump Stations. 378 379 6. The CFI component of the Wholesale Water Rate shall be determined by 380 the District after a review of the District's 5-year capital improvement plan by the 381 Wholesale Committee. The Wholesale Committee shall approve CFI funding for each 382 year of the five (5) year capital improvement plan, after considering the different 383 financial and rate impacts of funding wholesale projects with cash or by debt and such 384 other factors deemed relevant by the Committee. 385 386 7. Annually, before the Wholesale Water rate is developed, the Wholesale 387 Committee shall review and approve what, if any, Other Program Funding, including 388 costs incurred by the District that are not otherwise included in the Wholesale Water 389 Cost, should be allocated to Wholesale Customers and included in the Wholesale Water 390 Rate. Approval will require a majority vote of the Wholesale Customers plus District. 391 392 8. The District shall establish a separate wholesale capital improvement 393 sinking fund (reserve) to segregate and account for certain revenues received from the 394 Wholesale Customers as identified in this Agreement. The sinking fund shall contain the 395 balance in the bond reserve fund as identified in the current wholesale contract. The 396 District shall deposit into the wholesale capital improvement sinking fund all revenues 397 received from: 398 399 A. The Cash (Rate) Funded Improvements (CFI) component of the 400 Wholesale Water Rate; and 401 B. Wholesale Water Rates to meet the minimum debt service coverage 402 ratio requirements (rate covenant). 403 404 Interest earned on the balance of the Wholesale Capital Improvement Sinking 405 Fund shall be retained in the sinking fund and credited to the sinking fund on a monthly WHOLESALE WATER SUPPLY AGREEMENT Alderwood Water & Wastewater District / City of Edmonds pg. 14 Packet Pg. 167 8.A.a l 406 basis in a manner consistent with the methodology the District uses to allocate interest to 407 its funds. 408 Except as otherwise provided, all funds deposited into the Wholesale Capital 409 Improvement Sinking Fund shall be applied to the cost of wholesale capital improvement 410 projects undertaken by the District. On the recommendation of the Wholesale Committee 411 the District may use these funds to pay the cost of any other wholesale -related activity 412 (e.g. early buy -down of debt, buy -down a rate adjustment, rate transition, etc.). 413 414 9. Whenever a component of the Wholesale Water Cost is determined by 415 meter readings and some condition (e.g. meter failure, emergency conditions [e.g. 416 earthquake]) would make the use of those readings unreasonable or inequitable to the 417 District or to the Wholesale Customers, the District shall use its best and reasonable 418 judgment to "normalize" the volumetric usage data for purposes of establishing the 419 affected component of the Wholesale Water Rate. 420 421 10. The District may utilize District funds to finance Wholesale Facility 422 improvements, the funding size of which is not practical for issuance of bonds, and the 423 Cash (Rate) Funded Wholesale Facility Improvements option has not been approved by 424 the Wholesale Committee. The capital funds necessary for the improvement would be 425 provided by the District subject to reimbursement through wholesale water rates for a 426 term not to exceed ten (10) years. The rate would be determined based upon the average 427 rate of investments for District funds for the prior year. The rate may be adjusted 428 annually utilizing the District's annual investment rate for the prior year. The District 429 also reserves the right to terminate this funding option at any time during the term by 430 adding the remaining funds yet to be paid to a larger bond issue. If so elected, the 431 wholesale portion would be the pro rata share of the bond issue at the terms of the bond 432 issue. 433 434 435 WHOLESALE WATER SUPPLY AGREEMENT Alderwood Water & Wastewater District / City of Edmonds pg. 15. Packet Pg. 168 8.A.a 436 SECTION XII. - BILLING & PAYMENT 437 438 The District shall bill the Customer for water supplied under this Agreement on regular 439 monthly intervals. 440 The Master Meters shall be read and recorded on or about the last normal work day of the 441 month in which the service was furnished. Billing to the Customer shall be made by the 1 Oth day of 442 the month following, and payment to the District is due by the 30th day of the month in which the 443 statement is received. If any payment or portion thereof due the District shall remain unpaid for 444 25 days following its due date, the Customer shall be charged with and pay to the District interest 445 on the amount unpaid from its due date until paid at the rate of eight (8)% per annum. 446 If any or all of a bill is in dispute, the Customer shall pay the amount as billed and both 447 the District and the Customer shall agree to the time line to resolve the disputed amount. If any 448 material error, an amount greater than $1,000 per month is discovered in the rate calculation, 449 billing, payment, interest allocation, or any other calculation or assumption, the District shall 450 correct the error retroactively from the date of receipt of notice of the error backwards for a 451 period of up to three (3) years or as mutually agreed. The $1,000 amount shall be adjusted for 452 inflation every five (5) years with CPI-U as described in Section XI of this agreement. 453 454 SECTION XIII. - TERM & EXPIRATION 455 456 (1) The term of this Agreement shall be from its effective date until January 1, 2055. 457 The Parties may renew this Agreement by mutual written agreement upon such terms and 458 conditions as the Parties may later agree. 459 (2) If the Customer shall cease to take water from the District without the District's 460 consent, the Customer shall remain liable for its proportionate share of the then existing wholesale 461 bonded indebtedness issued before January 1, 2055 as may at that time be determined including 462 credits for certain payments and recognition given to the growth experienced in the Customer, District, 463 and all other Wholesale Customers. This liability shall continue only until such time as all or 464 part of the water supply no longer taken by the Customer from the District is sold by the District 465 to another party. In that event, liability shall be reallocated, in whole or in part, to the new 466 customer. WHOLESALE WATER SUPPLY AGREEMENT Alderwood Water & Wastewater District / City of Edmonds pg. 16 Packet Pg. 169 8.A.a 467 (3) If the District shall cease to supply water to the Customer without the Customer's 468 consent, the Customer shall cease to be liable for its proportionate share of the wholesale bonded 469 indebtedness as described in Subsection 2 above. 470 471 SECTION XIV. - NOTICE OF NEGOTIATION 472 473 The Customer shall receive timely written notice of negotiation with City of Everett for a 474 rate change or additional water and the Customer shall have the right to be present at such meetings. 475 476 SECTION XV. - FORCE MAJEURE AND CHANGES IN LAW 477 478 Neither Party hereto shall be considered to be in default in respect to any obligations 479 hereunder if prevented from fulfilling such obligations due to conditions beyond their reasonable 480 control or due to changes in state or federal law. If a Party is unable to perform in whole or in 481 part because of such condition or change in the law, the Party shall diligently and promptly take 482 reasonable steps to allow it to perform. The Parties expressly acknowledge and agree that the 483 inability or preclusion of the City of Everett to perform, in whole or material part, the Everett 484 Supply Agreement caused by an order or directive of governmental authority or a court with 485 jurisdiction shall constitute a force majeure or change in law event hereunder. 486 487 SECTION XVI. - LEGAL RELATIONS 488 489 Each Party shall defend, hold harmless, and indemnify the other from any and all claims, 490 demands, suits, and judgments arising out of its conduct. If, and to the extent, the Parties are 491 both liable to a third party claimant, each Party shall be responsible to the extent of its fault, and 492 shall defend, hold harmless, and indemnify the other for its fault. The foregoing indemnity is 493 specifically and expressly intended to constitute a waiver of each Party's immunity under 494 Washington's Industrial Insurance Act, RCW Title 51, but only with respect to the other Party 495 only, and only to the extent necessary to provide each Party with a full and complete indemnity 496 of claims made by the other Party's employees. The Parties acknowledge that these provisions 497 were specifically negotiated and agreed upon by them. WHOLESALE WATER SUPPLY AGREEMENT Alderwood Water & Wastewater District / City of Edmonds pg. 17 Packet Pg. 170 8.A.a 498 SECTION XVII. - DISPUTE RESOLUTION 499 500 The Parties are committed to working cooperatively in resolving all matters related to this 501 Agreement and achieving its intent and purpose. If a dispute should arise, the Parties agree to 502 meet on an informal basis within fourteen (14) calendar days after receipt of written notice of the 503 dispute submitted by a Party to attempt to resolve the dispute. 504 If the Parties are unable to resolve the dispute on an informal basis within thirty (30) 505 days, the Parties agree they shall utilize mediation. Each Party shall be responsible for the costs 506 of their own legal representation and pro rata cost of mediator. 507 Any dispute arising under this Agreement that is not resolved pursuant to the mediation 508 process may, upon mutual agreement of the Parties, if such agreement occurs within twenty 509 (20) calendar days of the failure of the Parties to reach resolution through mediation, be resolved 510 by binding arbitration by a single arbitrator. Within seven (7) calendar days of the date the 511 Parties agree to arbitration, each Party shall provide the other Party with the names of three (3) 512 neutral arbitrators having experience in the subject matter of the dispute and in arbitrating 513 disputes. The Parties will thereafter attempt in good faith to select an arbitrator from this panel 514 of six (6) potential arbitrators. 515 If the Parties are unable to agree upon a single arbitrator within twenty (20) calendar days 516 from the date the Parties agree to binding arbitration, then each Party shall designate one (1) 517 arbitrator from its panel of three (3) arbitrators. The two (2) designated arbitrators shall then 518 select a third arbitrator from the remaining arbitrator panel members, and this third arbitrator 519 shall act and serve as the single arbitrator for the dispute. The Parties shall equally split the 520 arbitrator's fee and all arbitration expenses. The prevailing party at arbitration shall be entitled to 521 an award by the arbitrator of its attorneys' fees and costs at the arbitrator's discretion. 522 The Parties agree that this dispute resolution process shall precede any action in a judicial 523 or quasi-judicial tribunal. 524 The Parties also agree that at all times pending resolution of the dispute, the Parties shall 525 continue to perform their respective duties and obligations in accordance with the terms and 526 conditions of this Agreement. The intent of the Parties is to preserve the status quo under the 527 Agreement. By way of illustration and not limitation, the Parties wish to assure uninterrupted 528 water service and compliance with the payment provisions of Section XII. WHOLESALE WATER SUPPLY AGREEMENT Alderwood Water & Wastewater District / City of Edmonds pg. 18 Packet Pg. 171 8.A.a 529 SECTION XVIII. - GOVERNING LAW AND VENUE 530 531 This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the 532 state of Washington. Any lawsuit or judicial action or proceeding arising out of or relating to 533 this Agreement that could not be resolved through Dispute Resolution, shall be heard in the 534 Superior Court of the State of Washington in and for Snohomish County. 535 536 SECTION IXX. - NO THIRD PARTY BENEFICIARIES 537 538 Except as expressly set forth in this Agreement, nothing in this Agreement is intended 539 to confer upon any person or entity, other than the Parties hereto, any rights, benefits, or 540 obligations. No such third -party shall have any right to enforce any of the provisions of this 541 Agreement unless expressly stated otherwise herein. 542 543 SECTION XX. - LIMITATION ON DAMAGES 544 545 Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, neither the District nor the 546 Customer shall be liable to the other under or pursuant to this Agreement for indirect, 547 incidental, special, exemplary, punitive, or consequential damages, including but not limited 548 to damages for lost profits, revenues or benefits, loss of property use, the cost of capital, or 549 the cost of purchased or replacement water. 550 551 SECTION XXI. - GENERAL PROVISIONS 552 553 (1) Waiver: A waiver by either Party of any terms or conditions of this 554 Agreement shall not be deemed or construed to be a waiver of any other term or condition, 555 nor shall the waiver of any breach be deemed or construed to constitute a waiver of any 556 subsequent breach, whether of the same or any other term or condition of this Agreement. 557 (2) Assignment: Except where one of the Parties merges, consolidates or 558 combines with another entity neither this Agreement nor any of the rights, interests or 559 obligations created hereunder may be assigned by either Party without the written consent of WHOLESALE WATER SUPPLY AGREEMENT Alderwood Water & Wastewater District / City of Edmonds pg. 19 Packet Pg. 172 8.A.a 560 the other Party. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the 561 successors and assigns of the respective Parties. 562 (3) Notices: Any notices required or permitted to be given hereunder shall be given 563 in writing and shall be delivered (a) in person, (b) by certified mail, postage prepaid, return 564 receipt requested, (c) by electronic transmission in the form of email or facsimile, or (d) by a 565 commercial overnight courier that guarantees next day delivery and provides a receipt, and such 566 notices shall be addressed as follows: 567 568 To the Customer: 569 Public Works Director 570 City of Edmonds 571 7110 210' Street SW 572 Edmonds, WA 98026 573 Fax: 425-774-6057 574 575 To the District: 576 General Manager 577 Alderwood Water & Wastewater District 578 3626 - 156th Street SW 579 Lynnwood, Washington 98087 580 Fax: 425-742-4562 581 582 or to such other address designated in writing by the addressee. 583 (4) Entirety: All prior negotiations and agreements between the parties hereto 584 relating to the subject matter hereof are merged into and superseded by this Agreement, 585 which shall constitute the entire agreement between the Customer and the District concerning 586 the sale of water to the Customer. 587 (5) Authority: Each Party represents and warrants that it has the power and legal 588 authority to enter into this Agreement. The individual(s) executing this Agreement on behalf 589 of the respective Party represents and warrants that such individual has the power and 590 authority to do so. WHOLESALE WATER SUPPLY AGREEMENT Alderwood Water & Wastewater District / City of Edmonds pg. 20 Packet Pg. 173 8.A.a 591 (6) Effective Date: This Agreement shall become effective ("Effective Date") 592 upon the date of the expiration or termination of the existing contract for wholesale water 593 supply between the Parties dated the 20th day of September 2010. 594 (7) Attorneys' Fees and Costs: In the event that either Party commences any legal 595 action or proceeding relating to the provisions or enforcement of this Agreement, the 596 prevailing party shall be entitled to receive, and the non -prevailing party shall pay, its 597 reasonable attorneys' fees and costs, including those incurred in any appeal. 598 (8) Exhibits Incorporated by Reference: Any exhibits attached to this Agreement 599 are fully incorporated herein by this reference. 600 (9) Titles to sections and subsections in this Agreement are for reference purposes 601 only and shall have no substantive effect. 602 (10) In the event of a material breach or default of this Agreement by either of the 603 Parties, the Parties acknowledge that it may be difficult to measure the resulting damages and 604 that monetary damages may not provide a complete or adequate remedy. Accordingly, the 605 non -defaulting Party, in addition to damages and any other relief sought or recovered, shall 606 be entitled to seek injunctive relief and the specific performance of the terms and conditions 607 of this Agreement. 608 (11) If any term, condition or provision of this Agreement is determined to be void, 609 unenforceable or limited in its application or effect in a legal proceeding, such determination 610 shall not affect any other provisions in this Agreement and all other provisions shall remain 611 in full force and effect. 612 (12) Any new water Wholesale Customer Agreement utilizing the same Wholesale 613 Water Facilities as included in the Agreement, shall have the same terms and conditions as 614 this Agreement, with the exclusion of Exhibits A, D and E. 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 WHOLESALE WATER SUPPLY AGREEMENT Alderwood Water & Wastewater District / City of Edmonds pg. 21 Packet Pg. 174 8.A.a 622 CITY OF EDMONDS 623 A Municipal Corporation 624 625 626 By: 627 Its: /i't o 0- 628 Date: y —)® - /D 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 O..i E, 646 647 MR ATTEST: d. City Clerk APPR N&Ta-.qr City Attorney WHOLESALE WATER SUPPLY AGREEMENT Alderwood Water & Wastewater District / City of Edmonds ALDERWOOD WATER & WASTEWATER DISTRICT A Municipal Corporation By: Its: EQAi2D PRe�I DENT Date: SERVEM 13Et2 / , 2010 pg. 22 Packet Pg. 175 8.A.a ALDERWOOD WATER & WASTEWATER DISTRICT AND CITY OF EDMONDS WHOLESALE WATER SUPPLY AGREEMENT EXHIBIT A — QUANTITY OF WATER TO BE PURCHASED All quantities in Million Gallons ber Dav (MGD) 2010 3.6 7.1 2020 3.6 7.2 2050 4.6 9.0 WHOLESALE WATER SUPPLY AGREEMENT Alderwood Water & Wastewater District / City of Edmonds pg. 23 Packet Pg. 176 8.A.a ALDERWOOD WATER & WASTEWATER DISTRICT AND CITY OF EDMONDS WHOLESALE WATER SUPPLY AGREEMENT EXHIBIT B - WHOLESALE FACILITIES The water lines including transmission facilities are shown on a separate map exhibit. The following is a list of the wholesale facilities referenced in the Agreement, in addition to the water lines shown on the separate map. Evergreen Way Pump Station Site (6003 Evergreen Way, Everett) Pump Station No. 1 Pump Station No. 2 Maintenance and Operation Site (15204 35d' Avenue W, Lynnwood) Reservoir No. 1 Chlorination Facility Ancillary valves and piping associated with the above assets Administration Site (3626 156' Street SW, Lynnwood) Reservoir No. 2 Reservoir No. 3 Chlorination Facility Ancillary valves and piping associated with the above assets Edmonds Master Meter Site (168d' Street SW and 62nd Avenue W, Edmonds) Master Meter Vault and ancillary assets Lynnwood Master Meter Site (Spruce Way and 164d' Street SW, Lynnwood) Master Meter Vault and ancillary assets Mountlake Terrace Master Meter Site (212d' Street SW and 44d' Avenue W, Mountlake Terrace) Master Meter Vault and ancillary assets (Emergency supply at 38d' Avenue W and 228d' Street SW) Mukilteo Water & Wastewater District Meter Site (Harbour Point Boulevard and St. Andrews Drive; and Beverly Park Road and Center Road, Mukilteo) Master Meter Vault and ancillary assets WHOLESALE WATER SUPPLY AGREEMENT Alderwood Water & Wastewater District / City of Edmonds pg. 24 Packet Pg. 177 ALDERWOOD WATER & WASTEWATER DISTRICT AND CITY OF EDMONDS WHOLESALE WATER SUPPLY AGREEMENT EXHIBIT C - REGIONAL FACILITIES The regional water lines and larger water transmission facilities are shown on a separate map exhibit. The following list contains additional regional facilities as referenced in the Agreement. Evergreen Way Pump Station Site (6003 Evergreen Way, Everett) Leased Site Pump Station No. 1 Pump Station No. 2 Maintenance and Operation Site (15204 35th Avenue W, Lynnwood) Site Reservoir No. 1 High Tank No. 1 High Tank No. 2 Booster Pump Station Chlorination Facility Ancillary valves and piping associated with the above assets Maintenance and Operation Administration Building Shop Facility Warehouse Facilities Material Storage Facilities Administration Site (3626 156th Street SW, Lynnwood) Site District Administration Building Reservoir No. 2 Reservoir No. 3 Chlorination Facility Ancillary valves and piping associated with the above assets WHOLESALE WATER SUPPLY AGREEMENT Alderwood Water & Wastewater District / City of Edmonds pg. 25 Packet Pg. 178 8.A.a ALDERWOOD WATER & WASTEWATER DISTRICT AND CITY OF EDMONDS WHOLESALE WATER SUPPLY AGREEMENT EXHIBIT D — CUSTOMERS WATER SERVICE AGREEMENT TO OTHER SUPPLIERS NONE IDENTIFIED WHOLESALE WATER SUPPLY AGREEMENT Alderwood Water & Wastewater District / City of Edmonds pg. 26 Packet Pg. 179 8.A.a ALDERWOOD WATER & WASTEWATER DISTRICT AND CITY OF EDMONDS WHOLESALE WATER SUPPLY AGREEMENT EXHIBIT E — MASTER METER LOCATION 168d' Street SW and 62nd Avenue W WHOLESALE WATER SUPPLY AGREEMENT Alderwood Water & Wastewater District / City of Edmonds pg. 27 Packet Pg. 180 LM to uoiMuasaad : L96Z) MOIAab A3U06d LM eunr ueId W81SAS Ja;eM spuouap3 :4u8uay3e}}d r q oo Q r 0) a INTERLOCAL OPERATING AGREEMENT CITY OF EDMONDS AND OLYMPIC VIEW WATER AND SEWER DISTRICT a RELATING TO WATER AND SANITARY SEWER SERVICES WITIIIN THE EDMONDS CITY LD41TS 7'4 THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this day of gn j 1� tf ., 2004, by and between the City of Edmonds, a Washington, non -charter optional municipal code city (the "City") and the Olympic View Water and Sewer District, a special purpose municipal corporation (the "District"); WHEREAS, the City is the local government with authority and jurisdiction with respect to the territory within its corporate boundaries; and WHEREAS, the District provides water and sanitary sewer service to properties located in the District and properties lying within the City's corporate boundaries; and WHEREAS, the City owns and operates water and sanitary sewer utilities for the vast majority of property within its boundaries; and WHEREAS, the District and City agree that the District has provided its service area, including an area now located within the City of Edmonds, with water and sanitary sewer services for many years; and WHEREAS, the City desires to assure its residents of water and sanitary sewer services which comply with federal, state and local law, which will protect the public's health safety and welfare, and will be provided under uniform standards of service; and WHEREAS, the City and District have separately negotiated a ten-year Franchise Agreement to establish the terms and conditions under which the District is granted the authority to maintain its water and sewer system within the City's rights -of -way, subject to simultaneous execution with this document, and WHEREAS, the City and District are authorized under Chapter 39.34, RCW, the Interlocal Cooperation Act, and RCW 35.13A.070 to contract for the coordinated exercise of powers and sharing of resources for the efficient delivery of services to their residents, and the governing bodies have passed resolutions approving the execution of this Agreement; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the terms and provisions contained herein, and the Franchise Agreement executed contemporaneously by the parties, the City and District agree as follows: Section 1. E=ose. It is the purpose of this Agreement to guide the activities, resources and efforts of the City and District in order to provide the citizens of the City and the ratepayers served by the District with efficient, high quality and well -maintained water and sanitary 1W 5S572711D0C;1 /00005.900000/) 6/11/200411:13 AM LM 10 u01MUOSOM : L96Z) MOIAab A3U06d LM eunr ueId uaa;sAg Ja;eM spuouap3 :4u8uay3e}}d q co Q 06 6 a sewerage wastewater systems at a reasonable cost and define the legal relationship between the parties with regard to the exercise of the City's statutory authority pursuant to RCW 35.13A for M the term of this Agreement. a Section 2. Term of Agmement. The term of this Interlocal Operating Agreement shall be indefinite and shall remain in effect until terminated as provided in this Agreement. Section 3. City Responsibilities: 3.1 Franchise Grant to the District. The City shall grant a non-exclusive franchise to the District in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated by reference herein as fully as if herein set forth, for an initial term of ten (10) years, commencing on the date of execution and terminating as provided herein. After the first year of the agreement, the parties intent is to create a ten-year rolling term for the mutual stability of their working relationship. In consideration of the promises contained herein and for so long as this Agreement is in effect, the City shall charge a franchise fee of $10 per year. Such franchise may be renewed upon termination under the most favorable terms offered to a public utility by the City and renewal shall not be unreasonably withheld, so long as the District complies with all conditions thereof. If this Agreement is approved by the District on or before June 30, 2004, the City shall pay the costs associated with publication of the franchise. Otherwise, the District shall pay all such costs. 3.2 Assumption by the Citv. The City agrees, recognizing the long term planning horizon necessary, to provide and maintain adequate municipal water and sewer facilities and the need for long term financing of these high cost assets, and that in consideration of the "Interlocal Operating Agreement Fee" to be paid by thelDistrict to the City as set forth herein in Section 4 of this Agreement, and the other terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement, as well as in the Franchise Agreement, it shall not, during the pendency of this Agreement, exercise its statutory authority granted under Chapter 35.13A RCW, as currently in effect or as may hereafter be amended in the future, to assume jurisdiction over the District or any District responsibilities, property, facilities or equipment within the City's corporate limits, including future annexed areas ("assummption"). 3.2.1 During the first ten years of the agreement, the City shall not commence the process of assumption. 3.2.2 If notice of termination is given pursuant to Section 5, the city may commence the process of assumption beginning three years prior to the termination date, provided, however, that: 3.2.2.1 The process of assumption shall not be completed through final legislative and administrative action during the pendency of this Agreement; and 3.2.2.2 In no event shall the process of assumption be commenced during the initial ten years of the Agreement. (wss572712.DOc; 1/00006s00000/) 6/111200411:13 AM 2 LM 10 U01Muosoad : L96Z) MOIAob A3U06d LM ounr ueId uao;sAg Ja;eM spuouap3 :4u8uay3e}}d Q 3.3 Fees and Char. The City shall not during the term of this Agreement, impose any new fees on the District for City costs and services addressed and compensated for in the Franchise Agreement or in this Interlocal Operating Agreement. 3.4 Future Statute Authorizing City Utility Tax on the District. In the event that the Washington State Legislature should in the future authorize the City to impose a utility tart upon a district based upon the district's revenues, or upon any other basis, the payments herein below provided as the District's contractual consideration for this Agreement, shall be credited against such a utility tax as the City may impose and the District shall be obligated to pay only the statutorily defined tax liability in excess thereof; provided, however, this section shall not allow a credit against consideration of this Agreement for generally applicable regulatory fees or revenue generating charges or taxes that may be authorized by law as applicable to the District and adopted by the City during the term of this Agreement other than such a utility tax. 3.4.1 PassMEN-gh of Excess Utility Tax. In the event a utility tax on the District by the City is ultimately authorized by law, the District may remit such tax by passing the cost therefor onto the District's ratepayers residing within the City as a separate billing item. Section 4. The District's Resnonsibilities. In consideration of the City's commitments above and the concomitant Franchise Agreement, the District makes the following undertakings. 4.1 In consideration of and compensation for the City's undertakings under this Agreement from an exercise of its rights, as the statute now exists or may hereafter be amended, and the rights granted the District under a Franchise to operate its existing and future water and sewer facilities within the City's corporate limits, including any future annexed areas for the term of this Agreement, the District agrees to pay the City an "Interlocal Operating Fee" equal to 6% of customer billings, provided, however, that if the City changes the water and/or sewer utility tax levied on its customers, the percentage shall be changed to the same extent. 4.1.1 Pass -Through of Interlocal Operating Agreement Fee. The District may pass the cost of the Interlocal Operating Agreement Fee onto the District's ratepayers residing within the City as a separate billing item. 4.2 Schedule of Payments. The initial schedule of payments shall be equal to 6% of water and sewer billings which occur within the Edmonds City limits. Payments shall be remitted quarterly within thirty (30) days of the close of the quarter. In order to finally adjust annual payment to reflect late charges and collections and other adjustments, any payment necessary to finally adjust and correct the payments for each year shall be made by June 30 of the following year. Payment for the year of execution (2004), shall be made by February 15, 2005, and finally corrected by June 30, 2005. 4.3 Annexation. In the event that the City shall in the future annex property in accordance with the provisions of statute, and all or any part of said annexed area shall be within the service area of the District, such service area shall, upon the annexation of the areas by the City, be subject to the terms of this Agreement (wss572712.DOC:1l00006.9000001) 6111/200411:13 AM 3 M co a. a� M a. LM 10 uoiMuasaad : L96Z) nnainab ADUOBd LM aunt ueId u ISAS Ja;eM spuouap3 :4u8uay3e}}d Q Section 5. Termination, In addition to all of the rights and powers to remedy default, including specific performance, both parties reserve the right to revoke and terminate this Agreement in the event of a substantial violation or breach of its terms and conditions. Either party may terminate this Agreement without cause by giving written notice ten (10) years in advance of the date of termination. The Agreement may be terminated or amended at any time with the express written consent of both parties. Section 6. Indemnification. The parties shall indemnify and hold harmless each other and their respective officers, agents and employees from any and all costs, claims or liabilities of any nature, including reasonable attorney's fees, costs and expenses for or on account of injuries or damage to any persons or property resulting from the negligent activities or omissions of that party or its respective agents or employees and arising from the performance of this Agreement. Section 7. Definitions. `The terms used in this Agreement, if not defined herein, shall have their meanings as defined in any other documents executed contemporaneously or in conjunction with this Agreement. Section 8. Remedies; No Waiver. In addition to the remedies provided by law, this Agreement shall be specifically enforceable by any party. The -failure of either party to exercise any right or enforce any provision of this Agreement shall not be considered a waiver of such right or enforcement remedy. The prevailing party in any proceeding to enforce this Agreement or interpret its terms shall be entitled to its reasonable attorneys' fees. Section 9. Venues. In the event' of litigation pertaining to this Agreement, the exclusive venues and places of jurisdiction shall be in Snohomish County, Washington. Section 10. Alternative Disoute Resolution — Arbitration. Except as otherwise provided under applicable state law, any dispute, controversy or claim arising out of or in connection with, or relating to, this Agreement or any breach or alleged reach of this Agreement, shall be submitted to, and settled by arbitration to be held in Snohomish County, Washington in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 7.04 of the Revised Code of Washington, as amended, and with respect to matters not covered in such statute, by the rules of the American Arbitration Association; provided, however, that in the event of any conflict between such statute and such rules, the provisions of the statute shall control; and provided further, that notwithstanding anything in such statute or rules to the contrary; (a) the arbitrator's decision and award shall be made according to the terms and provisions of this Agreement and the applicable law, and such award shall set forth findings of fact and conclusions of law of the arbitrator upon which the award is based in the same manner as is required in a trial before a judge of the Superior Court of the State of Washington; (b) the arbitrator shall award attorney's fees to the prevailing party; and (c) in any such arbitration, there shall be a single arbitrator and any decision made shall be final, binding and conclusive on the parties. The fees of the arbitrator shall be borne equally by the parties except that, in the discretion of the arbitrator, any award may include a parry's share of such fee if the arbitrator determines that the dispute, controversy or claim was submitted to arbitration as a dilatory tactic, was frivolous or was in bad faith. { WSS57Z712.DOC; I/OM6.900000/1 6/11/200411:13 AM 4 I* CO a m M a LM 10 u01MUOsaad : L96Z) MOIAab AOU06d LM eunr ueId uaa;sAg Ja;eM spuouap3 :4u8uay3e}}d c� Q Section 11. Binding. This Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the parties, their successors and assigns. Section 12. IRn )rceabilitv. If any provision of this Agreement shall be held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be illegal, invalid or unenforceable, the entire Agreement shall be held to be unenforceable. To the fullest extent permitted by law, and absent any significant change in circumstances, neither party shall be a party to, nor otherwise support a legal action challenging the legality,*validity or enforceability of this Agreement, or any term thereof. Neither party shall fund or initiate a legislative lobbying effort to prohibit or invalidate agreements of this type, provided, however, nothing herein shall be deemed to prohibit the parties from membership in associations such as the Association of Washington Cities or the Washington Association of Water and Sewer Districts. Section 13. Applicable Law. This Agreement shall be construed under the laws of the State of Washington. Section 14. Provisions required by RCW 39.34.030 and .040. 14.1 No separate entity is created. 14.2 No joint financing or budgeting is created. 14.3 No joint undertaking is anticipated and no administrator or joint board required. 14.4 No property shall be field jointly by the parties under this Agreement. 14.5 This Agreement shall become effective when filed with the Snohomish County Auditor. Section 15. Atto_ rneys' Fees. If either party employs an attorney to enforce any rights arising out of or relating to this Agreement, the prevailing party in such dispute shall be entitled to recover its reasonable attorneys' fees. Section 16. Entire Agent. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties with respect to its subject matter. It shall not be modified except by a written agreement signed -by bath parties. None of the provisions of this Agreement shall be deemed to have been waived by any act of acquiescence on the part of either party, its agents, or employees, but only by an instrument in writing signed by an authorized officer of the party. No waiver of any provision of this Agreement shall constitute a waiver of any other provision(s) or of the same provisions on another occasion. Section 17. Effective Date and Term of Contract. This Agreement shall be in full force and effect and binding irpon the parties hereto upon the execution of the Agreement. t W SS572711DOC;1 /00006.90M000/} 6111n00411.13 AM 5 LO CO a. a� M a. . r--' �. LM 10 uoileluasaad : L9LZ) MainaN A3u86d LLOZ aunt ueld w8lsft a81eM spuouap3 :WOM43el1v �a Q CITY OF EDMO S By. Mayo Gary enson ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED; Sandra S. Chase, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE F C ORNEY: W. Scott Snyder OW"IC WEW WATER AND SEWER M STATE OF WASHINGTON ) COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH) P66P G jgo?'p�OFL J G&Qdn A (L A4 /-5*vA 6 E'L On this day, personally appearedobefore me the of OLYMPIC VIEW WAT R AND SEWER DISTRICT and stated that he/she is authoriVed to sign this instrument on behalf of said company for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO (WSS572712.D0Q1/00006.900000/) 6/11/200411:13 AM me this c� �� day of `A (1 2004 5,.� �nYr�C�� YA rat�n n • 1�G 1,��2. u Print Name My Commission expires: tO 6 6 co a. m M a. L0Z 10 uoi;e;uasaad L9LZ) MOIAON A3u86V LLOZ aunt ueld uaa;sAS aa;eM spuouap3 :4u0uay3e1JV S R 00 Q C6 Card S- a WSS:jt:na 0 he 10/18/84 U Revised a 01/17/85 02/27/85 03/13/85 AGREEMENT FOR FURNISHING WATER AGREEMENT is reached this day between the City of Edmonds, Washington,_an,optional code city hereinafter referred to as "City", and Olympic View Water District hereinafter referred to as "District", WHEREAS, the District currently provides water directly through its mains and lines to properties located within the city limits of Edmonds and the boundaries of the Olympic View Water District, and WHEREAS, the District is willing to continue to supply said water to these customers, subject to the terms and condi- tions set forth herein, now, therefore, IN CONSIDERATION of the mutual covenants contained herein the parties agree as follows: 1. Water Furnished. The District agrees to supply an ade- quate supply of water to customers located within the city limits of the City and within the boundaries of the District, subject to such terms and conditions as the District shall provide and its water administrative code, Resolution 429, as currently enacted or amended in the future. 2. Billin2 and Payment. The District shall bill its indivi- dual customers directly for the amount of water furnished based upon their then current rates. The District shall be solely LOZ 10 uoi;e;uasaad : L9LZ) MainaN AOua6d LLOZ aunt ueld uaa;sAS aa;eM spuouap3 :;uauayaePV 00 ca 00 Q a responsible for reading meters, determining the amount of water a, consumed by each customer, as well as any default or delinquent a payment by said customers. The District shall be responsible for collection of these monies and the City shall have no obligation whatsoever to make payment for or on behalf of any citizen. 3. Increase in Rate. It is understood by the parties that the water rates charged for the District are subject to change and may be increased from time to time. Such increases shall not affect any other term of this agreement. 4. Collection of Utility Tax. The District shall collect for and on behalf of the City of Edmonds utility taxes as the City has established those taxes or shall amend them from time to time. The utility tax on water shall be added directly to the customer's billing. The District will remit to the City the taxes received from such accounts on a monthly basis. 5. Newly Annexed Areas. It is understood by the parties that the City may annex certain areas presently in unincorporated Snohomish County are served by the District. The District agrees that upon annexation of any such area then served by the District, it will continue to supply water customers within that area under the terms of the agreement. 6. Standard Specifications. The parties agree and acknowledge that the City, through its subdivision code, building permit process and other forms of development review is empowered by and under state law to establish minimum standards for the construction of water lines, fixtures and appurtenances_ The - 2 - 1-0Z 10 uoi;e;uasaad : L9LZ) MaiAON A3u86d LLOZ aunt ueld uaa;sft aa;eM spuouap3 :;uauayaeJJV ca 00 Q a District shall not approve or agree to the construction of any M facility not in conformance with such minimum standards, a provided, however, that nothing herein shall be interpreted to require or prevent the District from requiring a higher level of improvement if such requirements and specifications are filed with the City. The City shall notify all development applicants that the applicant should investigate whether the development will require a contract with the District and that the District may require construction in conformance with its own set of requirements and specifications, A. PERMIT APPLICATION: Upon receipt of an application for any building permit or development approval for any tract of land within or adjacent to the service area of Olympic View Water District, the City shall furnish a copy of said permit or development approval application to the District. The District shall have the obligation to review the permit and to inform the City in writing within fifteen (15) business days whether any written or oral agreement exists between the District and any party which might inhibit, promote or affect development of the tract. Development approval for the purposes of this Section shall refer to applications for subdivision of land, planned residential development and any other application which in the opinion of the City's Community Services Director is preparatory to development of any tract of land. B. APPLICATION FOR SERVICE. The District shall provide the City with copies of all applications for service, 7, Indemnity. The District, its successors and assigns, agree to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents and employees from any and all injuries or claims for damages of any kind or nature whatsoever arising either directly or indirectly from the furnishing of water to customers specified in this agreement, including but not limited - 3 - L�OZ 10 uoi;e;uasaad L9LZ) MaiAON A3u86V LLOZ aunt ueld w8lsft aa;eM spuouap3 :;uauayaeI)V Q a. to injuries, or claims for damages arising from the installation, M construction, maintenance and repair of water lines, mains and a appurtenances and from meter reading, excepting loss or claim arising from the negligence of the City. 8. Term. This agreement shall be effective upon execution by the parties and shall continue until terminated by either party giving at least six (6) months written notice of intent to terminate the agreement. 9. Amendment. All amendments to this agreement shall be in writing and executed by both parties. This agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties and there are no agree- ments, oral or otherwise, which bind the parties or supersede the express agreements contained herein. 10. Notice. Notice shall be given by depositing written notice in the U.S, mails, postage prepaid, addressed to the parties at the following addresses. Said notice shall be deemed received on the third day following posting in the U.S. mail. The addresses of the parties for the purposes of this section are as follows: City of Edmonds Edmonds Civic Center Edmonds, WA 98020 Olympic View Water District 23725 Edmonds Way Edmonds, WA 98020 11. Assignment. Neither of the parties hereto shall have the right to assign this agreement or any of its rights and obli- gations hereunder without the prior written consent of the other - 4 - fC Q 06 1-0Z 10 uoi;e;uasaad : L9LZ) MaiAON A3u86V LLOZ aunt ueld w8lsft aa;eM spuOwP3 :4u0wL43ePV party. This agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the respective successors and assigns of the parties hereto. 12. Waiver. No waiver by either party of any term or condi- tion of this agreement shall be deemed or construed as waiving any other term or condition nor shall waiver of any breach be deemed to constitute a waiver of any subsequent breach. DATED this 21 day of Attest: City Clerk Approved as to Form: Off.Ic Ci y Attorney By OLYMP�C VIEW WATER STRICT By B yJ 5 -- Attest: CIT By By r �. . 8.A.a E a� THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK L .N C d L L Q O U r O N O C O O C N N d L Q. Q Packet Pg. 192 8.A.a 0006.900000 09/25/03 WSS/amg R:10/27/03gjz R:11/13/03gjz R:6/9/04gjz R:6/11/04gjz ORDINANCE NO.3506 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, GRANTING OLYMPIC VIEW WATER AND SEWER DISTRICT A NON-EXCLUSIVE FRANCHISE TO CONSTRUCT, MAINTAIN, OPERATE, REPLACE AND REPAIR A WATER AND SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM WITHIN PUBLIC RIGHTS -OF -WAY OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE. WHEREAS, RCW 35A.11.020 grants the City broad authority to regulate the use of the public right of way; and WHEREAS, RCW 35A.47.040 authorizes the City "to grant nonexclusive franchises for the use of public streets, bridges or other public ways, structures or places above or below the surface of the ground for facilities for public conveyances, for poles, conduits, tunnels, towers and structures, pipes and wires and appurtenances thereof for transmission and distribution of electrical energy, signals and other methods of communication, for gas, steam and liquid fuels, for water, sewer and other private and publicly owned and operated facilities for public service," and WHEREAS, the Council finds that it is in the best interests of health, safety and welfare of residents of the Edmonds community to grant a non-exclusive franchise to the {WSS572714.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - I - Packet Pg. 193 8.A.a Olympic View Water and Sewer District for the operation of a water and sanitary sewer system within the City right-of-way, NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Definitions. The following terms contained herein, unless otherwise indicated, shall be defined as follows: 1.1 City. The City of Edmonds, a municipal corporation of the State of Washington, specifically including all areas incorporated therein as of the effective date of this ordinance and any other areas later added thereto by annexation or other means. 1.2 City Urban Growth Area. The urban growth area means that area defined by the City's comprehensive planning process. 1.3 Days: Calendar days. 1.4. Director: The Mayor or designee. 1.5. District: Olympic View Water and Sewer District. 1.6. Facilities: All pipes, access ways, pump stations, storage facilities, equipment, and appurtenances thereto, located in the City's right-of-way, utilized by the District in the operation of activities authorized by this Ordinance. The abandonment by District of any facilities as defined herein shall not act to remove the same from this definition. 1.7. Permittee: A person who has been granted a permit by the Permitting Authority, and District operating under Section 4.6 Blanket Permit of this agreement. 1.8 Permitting Authority: The City department authorized to process and grant permits (permitting authority) required to work in the City's right-of-way, or any agency authorized to perform this function on the City's behalf. Unless otherwise indicated, all references to Permitting Authority {WSS572714.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 2 - Packet Pg. 194 8.A.a shall include the designee of the department or agency head. 1.9 Person: An entity or natural person. 1.10 Right-of-way: As used herein shall refer to the surface of and the space along, above, and below any street, road, highway, freeway, lane, sidewalk, alley, court, boulevard, parkway, drive, utility easement, and/or road right-of-way now or hereafter held or administered by the City of Edmonds. 1.11 Olympic View Water & Sewer District Service Area: All the land located within the corporate boundaries of the District as they now or may in the future exist, plus those areas lying outside of the corporate boundaries of the District in which the District's water and sanitary sewer system sand appurtenances are now or may in the future be located. Section 2. Franchise. 2.1 Pursuant to RCW 35A.47.040 the City hereby grants to District, it's successors and assigns, subject to the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, a Franchise beginning on the effective date of this Ordinance. 2.2 This Franchise shall grant District the right, privilege and authority, subject to the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth; to construct, operate, maintain, replace and use all necessary equipment and facilities related to its water and sanitary sewer systems in, under, on, across, over, through, along or below the right-of-way for the purpose of its water and sanitary sewer utility facilities as approved under City permits issued by the Permitting Authority pursuant to the Franchise and City ordinances. 2.3 This ordinance is to be construed as granting permission to District to go only upon any public right-of-way described herein. Permission to go upon any other property owned or controlled by the City must be sought from the City and may be approved on a case by case basis. Section 3. Non -Interference of Facilities. {WSS572714.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 3 - Packet Pg. 195 8.A.a 3.1 District's Facilities shall be located, relocated and maintained within the right-of-way so as not to unreasonably interfere with the free and safe passage of pedestrian and vehicular traffic and ingress or egress to or from the abutting property and in accordance with the ordinances of the City and laws of the State of Washington. Nothing herein shall preclude District from affecting temporary road closures as reasonably necessary during construction or maintenance of its Facilities provided District receives prior City approval, which shall not be unreasonably withheld. Whenever it is necessary for District, in the exercise of its rights under this Franchise, to make any excavation in the right-of-way, District shall, upon completion of such excavation, restore the surface of the right-of-way to a condition that meets the specifications established within the City of Edmonds Engineering development standards and pre -approved plans and in accordance with standards of general applicability imposed by the City by ordinance or administrative order. Section 4. Right -of- Way Management. 4.1 Excavation. 4.1.1 During any period of relocation or maintenance, all surface structures, if any, shall be erected and used in such places and positions within the right-of-way so as to interfere as little as possible with the safe and unobstructed passage of traffic and the unobstructed use of adjoining property. District shall at all times post and maintain proper barricades and comply with all applicable safety regulations during such period of construction as required by the ordinances of the City or state law, including RCW 39.04.180, for the construction of trench safety systems. 4.1.2 Whenever District excavates in any right-of-way for the purpose of installation, construction, repair, maintenance or relocation of its facilities, it shall apply to the City for a permit to do so in accord with the ordinances and regulations of the City requiring permits to operate in the right-of-way. In no case shall any such work commence within any right-of-way without a permit, except as otherwise provided in this Ordinance. During the progress of the work, District shall not unnecessarily obstruct the passage or use of the right-of-way, and shall provide the City with plans, maps, and information showing the {WSS572714.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 4 - Packet Pg. 196 8.A.a proposed and final location of any facilities in accordance with Section 15 of this Ordinance. Approval shall be obtained in accordance with the provisions of Sections 4.6.2 and 4.6.3. 4.2 Abandonment of District's Facilities. District shall not abandon any of its facilities within the right-of-way without the prior written consent of the City. 4.3 Restoration after Construction. 4.3.1 District shall, after any installation, construction, relocation, maintenance, or repair of Facilities within the right-of-way, restore the right-of-way to City standard and at least the same condition existing prior to any such installation, construction, relocation, maintenance or repair. Survey monuments shall not be removed or destroyed without the District first obtaining the required Department of Natural Resources (DNR) permit in accordance with RCW 58.09.130 and WAC 332-120-030. All survey monuments, which have been disturbed or displaced by such work, shall be restored pursuant to all federal, state and local standards and specifications. District agrees to promptly complete all restoration work and to promptly repair any damage caused by such work at its sole cost and expense. 4.3.2 If it is determined that District has failed to restore the right-of-way in accordance with this Section, the City shall provide District with written notice, which shall include a description of actions the City believes necessary to restore the right-of-way. If the right-of-way is not restored in accordance with the City's notice within fifteen (15) days of that notice, or such longer period as may be specified in the notice, the City, or its authorized agent, may restore the right-of-way and District shall be responsible for all reasonable costs and expenses incurred by the City in restoring the right-of-way in accordance with this Section. The rights granted to the City under this Paragraph shall be in addition to those otherwise provided by this Franchise. 4.4 Bonding Requirement. District, as a public agency, is not required to comply with the City's standard bonding requirement for working in the City's right-of-way. {WSS572714.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 5 - Packet Pg. 197 8.A.a 4.5 Emergency Work, Permit Waiver. In the event of an emergency where any facilities located in the right-of-way are broken or damaged, or if District's construction area for their facilities is in such a condition as to place the health or safety of any person or property in imminent danger, District shall immediately take necessary emergency measures to repair or remove its facilities without first applying for and obtaining a permit as required by this Franchise. However, this emergency provision shall not relieve District from later obtaining necessary permits for the emergency work. District shall apply for the required permits the next business day following the emergency work or as soon as practical thereafter given the nature and duration of the emergency. 4.6 Blanket Permit. The terms "Minor Activities" and "Blanket Activities" are defined in a specifically negotiated "Blanket Permit for Activity Within The Public right-of-way," which is incorporated by this reference as fully as if herein set forth, a copy of which has been filed with the City Clerk and identified by Clerk's Receiving Number Permittee shall be authorized to perform Minor Activities without a City permit of any kind and Blanket Activities under the terms and conditions of the Blanket Permit. All other activities will require a separate permit in accordance with City ordinances. 4.6.1 The Permittee shall pay the City a permit inspection/processing fee in the amount set out in Blanket Permit Definitions and as established by the City Council. 4.6.2 The Permittee shall provide a monthly list of Blanket Permit construction activity by the IOth of the following month listing the previous month's completed activity authorized under this Section. 4.6.3 For each separate use of the right-of-way under this Section, and prior to commencing any work on the right-of- way under this Section, the Permittee shall: At least twenty- four (24) hours in advance of entering the right-of-way, fax or otherwise deliver to the Permitting Authority a City Job Start Notification Form, as provided by the Permitting Authority. Said form shall include, at a minimum, the following information: street address nearest to the proposed work site and description of work to be {WSS572714.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 6 - Packet Pg. 198 8.A.a performed. Permittee shall not commence work within the City right-of-way without approval and obtaining of a permit number and the Job Start Notification by the City Engineer or his designee. 4.6.4 The City reserves the right to alter the terms and conditions of Subsection 4.6 and of Blanket Permit by providing thirty (30) days written notice to the Permittee. Any change made pursuant to this Paragraph shall thereafter apply to all subsequent work performed pursuant to this Section. 4.6.6 In the event the Permittee fails to comply with any of the conditions set forth in this Section, the City may provide written notice of termination to operate under this Section to Permittee, stating with specificity, the basis for the termination of the Permittee's authority. 4.7 Safety. 4.7.1. District, in accordance with applicable federal, state, and local safety rules and regulations shall, at all times, employ ordinary care in the installation, maintenance, and repair of its facilities utilizing methods and devices commonly accepted in the sanitary sewer industry to prevent failures and accidents that are likely to cause damage, injury, or nuisance to persons or property. 4.7.2. District will make all reasonable effort to construct and maintain its facilities in the right-of-way in a safe and operational condition. 4.8. Dangerous Conditions, Authority for City to Abate. 4.8.1 Whenever Facilities or the operations of District cause or contribute to a condition that appears to endanger any person or substantially impair the lateral support of the adjoining right-of-way, public or private property, the City may direct District, at no charge or expense to the City, to take actions to resolve the condition or remove the endangerment. Such directive may include compliance within a prescribed time period. 4.8.2 In the event District fails or refuses to promptly take the action, or if emergency conditions exist which require immediate action to prevent imminent injury or damage to persons or property, the City may take such action as it {WSS572714.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 7 - Packet Pg. 199 8.A.a believes necessary and District shall reimburse the City for its actual costs incurred. Section 5. Relocation of System Facilities. 5.1 Whenever the City causes the grading or widening of the right-of-way or undertakes construction of any water or storm drainage line, lighting, signalization, sidewalk improvement, pedestrian amenities, or other public street improvement (for purposes other than those described in Section 5.3 below) and such project requires the relocation of District's then existing Facilities lying within that portion of the right-of-way, or an area affected by such city projects, the City shall: (1) Provide District, at least one hundred twenty (120) days prior to the commencement of such project, written notice that a project is expected which will or may require relocation of a portion of District's facilities; and (2) Provide District at least sixty (60) days prior to the commencement of such project, with reasonable plans and specifications for such grading, widening, or construction and a proposed new location within or adjacent to the right-of-way for District's Facilities. 5.2. After receipt of such notice and the plans and specifications, District shall relocate such Facilities within the right-of-way as to accommodate such street and utility improvement project ten (10) days prior to commencement of the project unless there is agreement to a different schedule for coordinating completion of relocation of Facilities, provided, however, District may, after receipt of written notice requesting a relocation of its Facilities, submit to the City written alternatives to such relocations of its Facilities and the time schedule. The City shall within a reasonable time evaluate such alternatives and advise the District in writing whether one or more of the alternatives is suitable to accommodate work that would otherwise necessitate relocation of the Facilities. If so requested by the City, District shall submit such additional information as is reasonably necessary to assist the City in making such evaluation. The City shall give each alternative full and fair consideration. In the event the City ultimately reasonably {WSS572714.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 8 - Packet Pg. 200 8.A.a determines that there is no other reasonable or feasible alternative, then District shall relocate its Facilities as otherwise provided in this Section 5. The City shall cooperate with District to designate a substitute location for its Facilities within the right-of-way. The cost of relocating such Facilities existing within the present limits of the City shall be paid as follows: (1) if the relocation occurs within five (5) years after District initially constructed such Facility, then the relocation shall be at the City's sole cost; (2) if the relocation occurs more than five (5) years after District initially constructed such Facility, then the relocation shall be at District's sole cost. 5.3 Obligations under this Section 5 shall not apply whenever any person or entity, other than the City, requires the relocation of District Facilities to accommodate the work of such person or entity within the Right -of way, or whenever the relocation of District's Facilities within the right-of-way is necessary to satisfy any requirement or condition of a City permit or approval issued on a land use action (including, without limitation, any condition or requirement imposed pursuant to any contract or in conjunction with approvals or permits for zoning, land use, construction or development) for the benefit of any person or entity other than the City. However, in the event the City reasonably determines (and promptly notifies District in writing of such determination) that the primary purpose of imposing such condition or requirement upon such person or entity which necessitates such relocation is to cause the construction of an improvement on the City's behalf and in a manner consistent with City approved improvement plans (as described in subsection 5.1 above) within a segment of the right-of-way then District shall require only those costs and expenses incurred by District in integrating and connecting such relocated Facilities with District's other Facilities to be paid to District by such person or entity, and District shall otherwise relocate its Facilities within such segment of the right-of-way in accordance with the provisions of subsection 5.1 above. The provisions of this Section 5.3 shall in no manner preclude or restrict District from making any arrangements it may deem appropriate when responding to a request for {WSS572714.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 9 - Packet Pg. 201 8.A.a relocation of its Facilities by any person or entity other than the City, where the facilities to be constructed by such person or entity are not or will not become City owned, operated or maintained facilities, provided that such arrangements do not unduly delay a City construction project. 5.4 Any cost or expense in connection with the location or relocation of any Facilities existing under benefit of easement or other rights not arising under this Franchise, shall be borne fifty percent (50%) by the City, and fifty percent (50%) by District. Section 6. Compliance with Codes and Regulations. 6.1 The rights, privileges and authority herein granted are subject to and governed by this ordinance and all other applicable ordinances and codes of the City of Edmonds, as they now exist or may hereafter be amended. Nothing in this ordinance limits the City's lawful power to exercise its police power to protect the safety and welfare of the general public. Any location, relocation, erection or excavation by District shall be performed by District in accordance with applicable federal, state and city rules and regulations, including the City Public Works Policies and Pre -approved Plans, and any required permits, licenses or fees, and applicable safety standards then in effect or any Memorandum of Understanding with District. 6.2 Upon written inquiry, District shall provide a specific reference to either the federal, state or local law or the Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission (WUTC) order or action establishing a basis for District's actions related to a specific franchise issue. 6.3 In the event that any territory served by District is annexed to the City after the effective date of this Franchise, such territory shall be governed by the terms and conditions contained herein upon the effective date of such annexation. Section 7. System Development Information. 7.1 District will assign a representative whose responsibility shall be to coordinate with the City on planning for CIP {WSS572714.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 10 - Packet Pg. 202 8.A.a projects including those that involve under grounding. At a minimum, such coordination shall include the following: (1) District shall meet with the City, other franchisees and users of the right-of-way, according to a schedule to be determined by the City, to schedule and coordinate construction; and (2) All construction locations, activities, and schedules shall be coordinated, as required by the Mayor or his designee, to minimize public inconvenience, disruption, or damages. (3) For the purpose of planning, District and the City shall provide each other with a copy of their respective current adopted Capital Improvement Plan annually and upon request by the other party. Section 8. Planning Coordination. The parties agree, as follows, to participate in the development of, and reasonable updates, to each other's planning documents. 8.1 For District's service within the City Urban Growth Area limits, District will participate in a cooperative effort with the City of Edmonds to develop a Comprehensive Plan - Utilities Element, that meets the requirements described in RCW 36.70A.070 (4). 8.2 District will participate in a cooperative effort with the City to ensure that the Utilities Element of the City's Comprehensive plan is accurate as it relates to District's operations and is updated to ensure it's continued relevance at reasonable intervals. 8.3 District shall submit information related to the general location, proposed location, and approximate capacity of all existing and proposed Facilities within the City as requested by the Director within a reasonable time, not exceeding sixty (60) days from receipt of a written request for such information. 8.4 District will update information provided to the City whenever there are major changes in the District's system plans for the City. {WSS572714.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - I I - Packet Pg. 203 8.A.a 8.5 District will provide information relevant to its operation within the City within a reasonable period of time after a written request to assist the City in it's need to develop and update it's Comprehensive Plan - Utilities Element, provided that such information is in District's possession or can be reasonably developed from information in District's possession. 8.6 The City will provide information relevant to District's operations within a reasonable period of time following a written request to assist District in the development or update of its Comprehensive Sewage System Plan, provided that such information is in the City's possession, or can be reasonably developed from the information in the City's possession. Section 9. Indemnification by District and Edmonds. 9.1 District hereby releases, covenants not to bring suit, and agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City, its elected officials, employees, agents, and volunteers from any and all claims, costs, judgments, awards, attorney's fees, or liability to any person, including claims by District's own employees to which District might otherwise be immune under Title 51 RCW, arising from personal injury or damage to property allegedly due to the negligent or intentional acts or omissions of District, its agents, servants, officers or employees in performing activities authorized by this Franchise. This covenant of indemnification shall include, but not be limited by this reference, claims against the City arising as a result of the acts or omissions of District, its agents, servants, officers or employees except for claims for injuries and damages caused by the sole negligence of the City. If final judgment is rendered against the City, its elected officials, employees, agents, and volunteers, or any of them, District shall satisfy the same. The City may appear in any proceeding it deems necessary to protect the City's or the public's interests. 9.2 The City hereby releases, covenants not to bring suit, and agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the District, its elected officials, employees, agents, and volunteers from any and all claims, costs, judgments, awards, attorney's fees, or liability to any person, including claims by City's own employees to which City might otherwise be immune {WSS572714.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 12 - Packet Pg. 204 8.A.a under Title 51 RCW, arising from personal injury or damage to property allegedly due to the negligent or intentional acts or omissions of City, its agents, servants, officers or employees in performing construction, maintenance or other city activities within the Rights -of - way. This covenant of indemnification shall include, but not be limited by this reference, claims against the District arising as a result of the acts or omissions of City, its agents, servants, officers or employees except for claims for injuries and damages caused by the sole negligence of the District. If final judgment is rendered against the District, its elected officials, employees, agents, and volunteers, or any of them, City shall satisfy the same. The District may appear in any proceeding it deems necessary to protect the District's interests or the interests of its ratepayers. 9.3 In the event any such claim or demand be presented to or filed with either party, such party shall promptly notify the other thereof, which party shall have the right, at its election and at its sole cost and expense, to settle and compromise such claim or demand. In the event any suit or action be begun against either party based upon any such claim or demand, such party shall likewise promptly notify the other party thereof, which party shall have the right, at its election and its sole cost and expense, to settle and compromise such suit or action, or defend the same at its sole cost and expense, by attorneys of its own election. 9.4 Inspection or acceptance by one party of any work performed by the other at the time of completion of construction shall not be grounds for avoidance of any of these covenants of indemnification. Said indemnification obligations shall extend to claims that are not reduced to a suit and any claims that may be settled prior to the culmination of any litigation or the institution of any litigation. 9.5. In the event either refuses to undertake the defense of any suit or any claim, after a request for defense and indemnification has been made pursuant to the indemnification clauses contained herein, and such refusal is subsequently determined by a court having jurisdiction (or such other tribunal that the parties shall agree to decide the matter), to have been a wrongful refusal, such party shall pay all of the other parry's costs and expenses for {WSS572714.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 13 - Packet Pg. 205 8.A.a defense of the action, including reasonable attorney's fees or recovering under this indemnification clause as well as any judgment against the party. 9.6. Should a court of competent jurisdiction determine that this Franchise is subject to RCW 4.24.115, then, in event of liability for damages arising out of bodily injury to persons or damages to property caused by or resulting from the concurrent negligence of District and the City, its officers, employees and agents, each party's liability hereunder shall be only to the extent of its negligence. This waiver has been mutually negotiated by the parties. Section 10. Insurance. 10.1. District shall procure and maintain in full force for the duration of the Franchise, insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the exercise of the rights, privileges and authority granted hereunder to District, its agents or employees. 10.2 In satisfying the insurance requirement set forth in this section, District may self -insure against such risks in such amounts as are consistent with good utility practice. District shall provide the City with sufficient written evidence, the sufficiency of which shall be determined at the reasonable discretion of the City, upon request, that such insurance (or self-insurance) is being so maintained by District. Such written evidence shall include, to the extent available from District's insurance carrier, a written certificate of insurance with respect to any insurance maintained by District in compliance with this Section. 10.3 Commercial General Liability insurance policy, written on an occurrence basis with limits no less than $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence and $2,000,000 aggregate for personal injury, bodily injury and property damage. Coverage shall include premises, operations, independent contractors, products -completed operations, personal injury and advertising injury. There shall be no endorsement or modification of the Commercial General Liability insurance excluding liability arising from explosion, collapse or underground property damage. The City shall be named as an additional insured under District's Commercial General Liability insurance policy. {wss572714.Doc;l/oo006.900000/) - 14 - Packet Pg. 206 8.A.a 10.4 Excess Liability in an amount of $5,000,000 each occurrence and $20,000.00 aggregate limit. The City shall be named as an additional insured on the Excess Liability insurance policy. 10.5 Automobile Liability insurance for owned, non -owned and hired vehicles with limits no less than $2,000,000 Combined Single Limit per accident for bodily injury and property damage 10.6 Payment of deductible or self -insured retention shall be the sole responsibility of District. 10.7 District shall require all its subcontractors to carry insurance consistent with this Section 10.3, and shall provide evidence of such insurance to the City upon request. 10.8 The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City, its officers, officials, or employees. In addition, the insurance policy shall contain a clause stating that coverage shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability. District's insurance shall be primary. Any insurance, self-insurance, or insurance pool coverage maintained by the City shall be excess of District's insurance and shall not contribute with it. Coverage shall not be suspended, voided, canceled by either parry, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days prior written notice has been given to the City. Section 11. Default / Enforcement. 11.1 The City reserves the right to revoke and terminate this Franchise and all rights and privileges of District in the event of a substantial violation or material breach of its terms and conditions. 11.2 A substantial violation or material breach by District shall include, but shall not be limited to, the following: (1) An uncured violation of any material provision of this Franchise, or any material rule, order or {WSS572714.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 15 - Packet Pg. 207 8.A.a regulation of the City which would endanger the public health, safety and welfare; (2) The practice of any fraud or deceit upon the ratepayers served by the District's water and sanitary sewer system. (3) The practice of any fraud or deceit upon the City. (4) Misrepresentation of material facts in the negotiation of this Franchise or its implementation. (5) An uncured failure to pay the fee associated with this Franchise. 11.3 No violation or breach of this Franchise shall occur which is without fault of either District or the City, unless they are the result of circumstances beyond District's or the City's reasonable control, such as Acts of God or unrelated third parties. Neither District, nor the City, shall be excused by economic hardship or by nonfeasance or malfeasance of its elected officials, officers, agents or employees. Damage to equipment causing service interruption shall be deemed to be the result of circumstances beyond District's or the City's control if it is caused by any negligent act or unintended omission of its employees (assuming proper training) or agents (assuming reasonable diligence in their selection), or sabotage, vandalism or malicious mischief by its employees or agents. District, or the City, shall bear the burden of proof in establishing the existence of such conditions. 11.4 Except in the case of termination of this Franchise pursuant to Paragraph 11.2d, the City, or District, prior to any termination or revocation of this Franchise, shall provide the other with detailed written notice describing any substantial violation or material breach upon which it proposes to take action. The party who is allegedly in breach shall have a period of 60 days following such written notice to cure the alleged violation or breach, or demonstrate to the other's satisfaction that a violation or breach has not occurred or does not exist, or submit a plan that is satisfactory to the other to correct the violation or {WSS572714.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 16 - Packet Pg. 208 8.A.a breach. If, at the end of said 60-day period, the party giving such notice reasonably believes that a substantial violation or material breach is continuing and that the party in breach is not taking satisfactory corrective action, the noticing party may, by written notice to the other party, declare that the party in breach is in default. Within 20 days after receipt of a written declaration of default, the party that is alleged to be in default may request, in writing, a hearing before the City Hearing Examiner, as provided by the City's development regulations. The Hearing Examiner's decision may be appealed by either party to the Snohomish County Superior Court within thirty (30) days following the date of the decision rendered. 11.5 The City may, in its discretion and without waiving its rights under Paragraph 11.4 above, provide, in writing, for an extension of the period for District to remedy any violation or breach of the Franchise terms or take such corrective action specified in the Notice and come into compliance with its obligations under this Franchise, so as to avoid its termination or revocation. 11.6 Any violation continuing for a period greater than 60 days may be remedied by the City at District's expense, unless District is diligently and in good faith proceeding with corrective action and its failure to complete corrective action is caused by unavoidable delays or events beyond its control. Section 12. Franchise Term. The term of the Franchise granted hereunder shall remain in full force for an initial term of ten (10) years from the effective date. It may be renewed for additional term(s) commensurate with the interlocal agreement between the parties Section 13. Non -Exclusive Franchise. This Franchise is not and shall not be deemed to be an exclusive Franchise. This Franchise shall not in any manner prohibit the City from granting other and further franchises under, over, upon, and along the right-of-way which do not interfere with District's existing water and sanitary sewer system and its rights under this {WSS572714.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 17 - Packet Pg. 209 8.A.a Franchise. This Franchise shall not prohibit or prevent the City from using the right-of-way or affect the jurisdiction of the City over the same or any part thereof. Section 14. Franchise Fee. 14.1. In consideration for the rights granted District under this agreement and the parties concomitant Interlocal Operating Agreement to occupy City right-of-way for the purpose of operating a water and sanitary sewer utility within the City dated June 28, 2004 and as compensation for the City's recovery of actual administrative expenses incurred by the City that are directly related to receiving and approving permits, licenses, cost of inspections, this franchise and inspecting plans for construction within the right-of-way, District agrees to pay the City a franchise fee of $10 annually in addition to those fees identified in Right -of - Way Management, Section 4. If the interlocal agreement is terminated by either party or by judicial action, the District shall pay an annual fee of the lesser of $3,000 or the lowest fee charged to any other public utility franchised by the City, whichever is less. Proceeds of the franchise fee collected shall be distributed to the City no later than 30 days after the end of each calendar year. 14.2 The fees and charges set forth in this ordinance are in addition to, and not in limitation of, the payments established by agreement in an interlocal agreement between the parties. Section 15. Records. As a condition of this Franchise, and without charge to the City, District agrees to provide the City with available as -built plans, maps, and records that show the vertical and horizontal location of its facilities within the right-of-way. This information shall be provided between one hundred twenty (120) and one hundred eighty (180) days of the effective date of this Ordinance and shall be updated upon reasonable request by the City. Section 16. Survival. All of the provisions, conditions and requirements of Sections 4.1 Excavation, 4.2 Abandonment Of District's Facilities, 4.3 Restoration After {WSS572714.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 18 - Packet Pg. 210 8.A.a Construction, 4.8 Dangerous Conditions, Authority For City To Abate, Section 5 Relocation of System Facilities, and Section 9 Indemnification, of this Franchise, shall be in addition to any and all other obligations and liabilities District may have to the City at common law, by statute, or by contract, and shall survive the City's Franchise to District for the use of the areas mentioned in Section 2.3 herein, and any renewals or extensions thereof. This Ordinance shall further be binding upon the heirs, successors, executors, administrators, legal representatives and assigns of District and all privileges, as well as all obligations and liabilities of District shall inure to its heirs, successors and assigns equally as if they were specifically mentioned wherever District is named herein. Section 17. Severability. If any Section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other Section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Franchise Ordinance. The Parties may amend, repeal, add, replace, or modify any provision of this Franchise to preserve the intent of the parties as expressed herein prior to any finding of invalidity or unconstitutionality. Section 18. Assignment. This Franchise shall not be sold, transferred, assigned, or disposed of in whole or in part either by sale, voluntary or involuntary merger, consolidation or otherwise, without the written approval of the City. This paragraph shall not act to require City approval of any District action to mortgage or otherwise encumber its facilities, or other action related to corporate financing, financial reorganization, or refinancing activity. Section 19. Notice. Any notice or information required or permitted to be given to the parties under this Franchise may be sent to the following addresses unless otherwise specified: {WSS572714.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 19 - Packet Pg. 211 8.A.a District General Manager Olympic View Water & Sewer District 23725 Edmonds Way Edmonds, WA 98026-1856 Phone: 425-774-7769 Fax: Administrative Services Director City of Edmonds 121— 5th Ave. North Edmonds, WA 98020 Phone: 425-771-0240 Fax: 425-771-0265 Section 20. Non -Waiver. The failure of either party to enforce any breach or violation by the other party of any provision of this Franchise shall not be deemed to be a waiver or a continuing waiver by the non -breaching party of any subsequent breach or violation of the same or any other provision of this Franchise. Section 21. Alternate Dispute Resolution. If the parties are unable to resolve disputes arising from the terms of this Franchise, prior to resorting to a court of competent jurisdiction, the parties shall submit the dispute to a non -binding alternate dispute resolution process agreed to by the parties. Unless otherwise agreed between the parties or determined herein, the cost of that process shall be shared equally. Section 22. Entire Agreement. This Franchise constitutes the entire understanding and agreement between the parties as to the subject matter herein and no other agreements or understandings, written or otherwise, shall be binding upon the parties upon execution and acceptance hereof. Section 23. Directions to Ci . Clerk. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to forward certified copies of this ordinance to District as set forth in this ordinance {WSS572714.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 20 - Packet Pg. 212 8.A.a District shall have sixty (60) days from receipt of the certified copy of this ordinance to accept in writing the terms of the Franchise granted to District by this ordinance. Section 24. District Acceptance of Franchise. District shall have no rights under this Franchise nor shall District be bound by the terms and conditions of this Franchise unless District shall, within thirty (30) days after the effective date of the ordinance, file with the City its written acceptance of this Franchise, in a form acceptable to the City Attorney. Section 25. Publication Costs. In accord with state law, this ordinance shall be published in full. Section 26. Effective Date. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifi- cally delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum, and shall take effect five (5) days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the title. APPROVED: MAYOR GARY HAAKENSON ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY: W. SCOTT SNYDER FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: 06/11/2004 PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: 06/22/2004 PUBLISHED: 06/27/2004 EFFECTIVE DATE: 07/02/2004 ORDINANCE NO. 3506 {WSS572714.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 21 - Packet Pg. 213 8.A.a SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO.3506 of the City of Edmonds, Washington On the 22nd day of June, 2004, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed Ordinance No. 3506. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting of the title, provides as follows: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, GRANTING OLYMPIC VIEW WATER AND SEWER DISTRICT A NON-EXCLUSIVE FRANCHISE TO CONSTRUCT, MAINTAIN, OPERATE, REPLACE AND REPAIR A WATER AND SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM WITHIN PUBLIC RIGHTS -OF -WAY OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE. The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request. DATED this 23rd day of June, 2004. CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE {WSS572714.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 22 - Packet Pg. 214 8.A.a I INTERLQCAL AGREEMENT 2 CITY OF EDMONDS AND CITY OF LYNNWOOD 3 For Emergency Watermain Interties 4 5 6 THIS INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is entered into by and between the 7 City of Edmonds, Washington ("Edmonds") and the City of Lynnwood, Washington 8 ("Lynnwood") (collectively, the "Parties"). 9 10 WHEREAS, Chapter 39.34 RCW authorizes two or more political subdivisions or units 11 of local government of the State of Washington to cooperate on a basis of mutual advantage to 12 provide for services and facilities; and 13 14 WHEREAS, Edmonds and Lynnwood are each authorized to provide water service, and 15 each currently provides water service to persons and properties located within its respective 16 water service area; and 17 18 WHEREAS, Edmonds' and Lynnwood's water service boundaries are located adjacent to 19 each other; and 20 21 WHEREAS, the Parties desired to obtain supplemental water supply for emergency 22 purposes through interties between their respective water systems, subject to certain terms and 23 conditions; and 24 25 WHEREAS, the Parties have constructed four emergency watermain interties at places 26 along their respective water service boundaries; and 27 28 WHEREAS, Edmonds is undertaking the construction of a fifth emergency watermain 29 intertie along those boundaries; and 30 31 WHEREAS, the Parties desire to enter into this Agreement for the purpose of defining 32 their respective rights, obligations, and liabilities regarding these emergency watermain interties; 33 and 34 35 WHEREAS, the City Councils of the City of Edmonds and the City of Lynnwood have 36 taken appropriate action to approve each Party's entry into this Agreement; 37 38 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the terms, conditions and covenants contained 39 herein, Edmonds and Lynnwood agree as follows: 40 41 TERMS 42 43 Section 1. P ose. The purpose of this Agreement is to allocate and define the Parties' 44 respective rights, obligations, and liabilities concerning the establishment, ownership, operation, 45 use and maintenance of the one new and four existing emergency watermain interties. The Interlocal Agreement for Emergency Watermain Interties Page 1 of 6 Packet Pg. 215 8.A.a I terms, conditions and covenants of this Agreement shall accordingly be interpreted to advance 2 this purpose. 3 4 Section 2. Term. This Agreement shall be effective upon its execution by both of the 5 Parties hereto, as indicated by the dates written below. Unless terminated in accordance with 6 Section 3, this Agreement shall remain in effect in perpetuity. 7 8 Section 3. Termination. Either Party may terminate this Agreement with or without 9 cause by providing the other Party with thirty (30) calendar days' written notice of its intent to 10 terminate. Termination shall not alter the Parties' obligations under Section 4 with respect to 11 obligations already performed by the other Party, and shall not alter the Parties' respective 12 obligations under Section 8 of this Agreement. 13 14 Section 4. Obligations. 15 16 A. Edmonds and Lynnwood agree to provide each other with an emergency standby 17 source of water through intertie connections between the Parties' water systems at the 18 rive locations described and depicted in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated 19 herein. by this reference. 20 21 B. Each intertie shall consist of water main, and two normally -closed valves, as depicted 22 on Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. The new, 23 fifth, intertie shall be constructed by Edmonds at its sole expense, at the location 24 described and depicted on Exhibit A. 25 26 C. To the extent necessary, each Party shall transfer ownership of any portion of an 27 intertie, including the water main and valves, that is located within the other Party's 28 water service area boundaries by a bill of sale at no cost to the other Party. Each 29 Party shall accept the transferred intertie facilities, if any, in an "as -is" condition. 30 Each Party shall then own, operate, repair, replace and maintain in good working 31 condition and in accordance with all applicable laws and regulations that portion of 32 each intertie located within its respective water service area boundaries. 33 34 D. Each intertie shall be used only in the event of an emergency as defined in Section 35 4.E, or when otherwise required due to a planned, temporary disruption of water 36 service resulting from construction or maintenance impacting the requesting Party's 37 water system or water supply. 38 39 E. For purposes of this Agreement, an emergency shall be any event that requires either 40 Party's water supply to be augmented on a temporary, unplanned basis, including but 41 not limited to a water shortage, a major water line break, fire demand, contamination 42 of water supply, mechanical or electrical equipment failure, or power supply failure. 43 Unless otherwise agreed to in writing by. the Parties, the maximum duration of an 44 emergency shall be seven calendar (7) days. 45 Interlocat Agreement for Emergency Watermain Interties Page 2 of 6 Packet Pg. 216 8.A.a I F. In case of water supply required for emergency use, Edmonds and Lynnwood shall 2 provide water immediately upon oral notification of such emergency by the other 3 Party. Follow-up written notice of such emergency request shall be made by the 4 requesting Party to the supplying Party within fourteen (14) business days of the oral 5 notification. In the event that the requesting Party anticipates that the emergency will 6 require use of the intertie for more than seven calendar (7) days, the requesting Party 7 shall provide an estimate of the duration of the emergency and request that the S supplying Party agree in writing to the requesting Party's use of the intertie for this 9 duration. 10 11 G. In case of water supply required for a planned, temporary disruption of service, the 12 requesting Party shall notify the supplying Party in writing at Ieast five (5) business 13 days in advance of the dates on which the requesting Party desires to receive water 14 through an intertie. The request shall include the startup time and the estimated 15 duration of intertie service, and shall state the reason for the service disruption 16 requiring use of the intertie. 17 18 H. When activating intertie service, each Party shall operate their respective system 19 components only, and shall provide adequate flushing of the system prior to 20 activating the intertie. 21 22 I. The Parties shall make reasonable efforts to provide an uninterrupted supply of water 23 during any period that an intertie is activated; provided, that neither Party shall be 24 liable for any shortage of or interruption in the delivery of water through an intertie. 25 In addition, neither Party shall be liable for any failure, interruption in or shortage of 26 water, or any loss or damage resulting therefrom occasioned by any cause beyond the 27 control of either Party. Neither Party guarantees the availability of water through any 28 intertie at all times because of each Party's respective needs and water demand. 29 Further, during critical water shortage periods as determined by a supplying Party, the 30 supplying Party, in that Party's sole discretion, may deny use of any intertie until 31 sufficient water supply exists to make such available for use by the requesting Party. 32 33 J. The quality of water delivered by either Party through any intertie shall comply with 34 all applicable federal, state and local Iaws and regulations, and shall be of the same 35 quality as that delivered by the supplying Party to that Party's other customers. Upon 36 request of either Party, the other Party shall provide information regarding the current 37 quality of water provided through any intertie, so that blending, compatibility, and 38 other water quality issues may be addressed. 39 40 Section 5. Billing for Water Used. 41 42 A. A written estimate of the quantity of water used shall be reported by the receiving 43 Party to the supplying Party within three (3) business days after the termination of 44 any intertie use. The estimate of water used shall be agreed upon by both parties and 45 shalI include a detailed explanation as to how the estimate was derived. If the intertie 46 use continues for more than thirty (30) calendar days, the written estimate of water Interlocal Agreement for Emergency Watermain Interties Page 3 of 6 3 r a Packet Pg. 217 8.A.a I use shall be provided on the first day of the following month. If unmetered use of 2 water is expected to exceed thirty (30) calendar days, the recipient agency shall install 3 a meter within thirty (30) days of activation of the unmetered intertie. 4 5 B. In the event that Edmonds or Lynnwood receives water through any intertie, both 6 Parties agree to pay the other Party for such water delivered at the wholesale rate plus 7 ten percent (10%). The wholesale rate per CCF shall be determined based on the 8 preceding complete calendar year, by dividing the total annual volume of water (in 9 CCF) delivered to Edmonds' or Lynnwood's end users within their respective water 10 service boundaries, into the total annual costs of potable water purchased from the 11 wholesale supplier(s) during the same calendar year. The Party delivering such water 12 shall bill the Party receiving such water monthly for the amount of water delivered. 13 The Party receiving such water shall pay the supplying Party within forty-five (45) 14 calendar days of the date of such billing. Any billings not paid by the receiving Party 15 within such 45-day period shall accrue interest at the rate of twelve percent (12%) per 16 annum until paid. 17 18 Section 6. Ownership of ,Property. Neither Party shall by virtue of this Agreement 19 acquire any proprietary or governmental interest in the water system of the other Party. Each 20 Party shall be solely responsible 'for the operation and maintenance of its own system of water .21 distribution. 22 23 Section 7. Administration- No Separate Entity Created. This Agreement shall be 24 administered jointly by the Edmonds City Engineer and the Lynnwood City Engineer. No 25 separate legal entity is formed by this Agreement. 26 27 Section 8. Release Indemnification and Hold Harmless Agreement. Each Party to this 28 Agreement shall be responsible for its own negligent and/or wrongful acts or omissions, and 29 those of its own officers, agents, employees, representatives, contractors or subcontractors, to the 30 fullest extent required by the laws of the State of Washington. Each Party agrees to protect, 31 indemnify and save the other Party harmless from and against any and all such liability for injury 32 or damage to the other Party or the other Party's property, and also from and against all claims, 33 demands and causes of action of every kind and character arising directly or indirectly, or in any 34 way incident to, in connection with, or arising out of the performance of this Agreement, caused 35 by its own negligence or wrongful acts or omissions, or that of its officers, agents, employees, 36 representatives, contractors or subcontractors; provided, that the indemnifying Party's obligation 37 to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the other Party for claims caused by or resulting from 38 the concurrent negligence or wrongful acts or omissions of the indemnifying Party shall apply 39 only to the extent of the negligence or wrongful acts or omissions of the indemnifying Party. 40 41 Section 9. Governing Law and Venue. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of 42 the State of Washington. Any action arising out of this Agreement shall be brought in 43 Snohomish County Superior Court. 44 45 Section 10. No Employment Relationship Created. The Parties agree that nothing in this 46 Agreement shall be construed to create an employment relationship between Edmonds and any Interlocal Agreement for Emergency Watermain Interties Page 4 of 6 Packet Pg. 218 8.A.a I employee, agent, representative or contractor of Lynnwood, or between Lynnwood and any 2 employee, agent, representative or contractor of Edmonds. 3 4 Section 11. No Third Party Rights. This Agreement is intended fox the sole and 5 exclusive benefit of the Parties bereto and no third Party rights are created by this Agreement. 6 7 Section 12. Notices. Notices to Edmonds shall be sent to the following address: 8 9 City of Edmonds 10 Public Works Director 11 7110210a'StSW 12 Edmonds, WA 98026 13 14 Notices to Lynnwood shall be sent to the following address: 15 16 Cityof L 1Lynnwood 7 City Engineer 18 P.O. Box 5008 19 Lynnwood, WA 98046 20 21 22 Section 13. Duty to File Agreement with County Auditor. Edmonds shall, after this 23 Agreement is executed by both Parties, file this Agreement with the Snohomish County Auditor. 24 25 Section 14. Integration/Amendment. This document constitutes the entire embodiment 26 of the agreement between the Parties with respect to the subject matter herein and supersedes and 27 replaces all prior agreeements, both written and oral. This Agreement may only be modified or 28 amended by an agreement in writing signed by both Parties hereto. 29 30 Section 15. Non -Waiver. Waiver by any Party of any of the provisions contained within 31 this Agreement shall not be construed as a waiver of any other provision. 32 33 Section 16. Binding Effect. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the 34 benefit of the Parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns. 35 36 37 CITY ED 38 39 By: 40 Dav Earling, Mayor 41 42 Date: ~' 43 44 45 ATTEST: 46 Interlocal Agreement for Emergency Watermain Interties Page 5 of 6 Packet Pg. 219 8.A.a 1 2 Scott Passe y, City C1 3 4 5 CED AS TO 8 Office of the City Attorney 9 10 11 12 CITY OF LYNNWOOD 13 1eNicola By:U&�6--L 'mith, Mayor 17 Date:'i�-- 18 19 20 ATTEST: 21 22 23 Art Ceniza, City Clerk 24 25 26 LAROVED AS TO FORM: 27 28 29 Office of City Attorney Interlocal Agreement for Emergency Watermain Interties Page 6 of 6 Packet Pg. 220 8: a ft >§ 7 }{ \|2 {» ƒ § /Oi z z z z z k § z z z z z %) «»°§ �| {a; )}%) ! /§(\;; - f§ � "^` 4Qk§§G . |]%® !.=c ƒ) ±;(` ) .a 3 E,A� 5 . f _ e ) 0 ƒ \\ ) a § ©_ { (k ) z z ))\\\ { \ \ . k z z z ƒ \ t0 o 16 /\I -S� !$:a:15 - ):E76 e )\ C> §; mZ« § ^ 4 a g 2 2 4 C) z } Packet Pg. 221 8.A.a EMERGENCY INTERTIE AGREEMENT BETWEEEN SEATTLE PUBLIC UTILITIES AND CITY OF EDMONDS This Agreement is made and entered into this_L day of December, 2011, by and between the City of Seattle, a Washington municipal corporation, acting through its Seattle Public Utilities ("SPU") and City of Edmonds, a Washington municipal corporation ("Water Utility"). WHEREAS, SPU and Water Utility each own and operate public water supply systems ("Water System") within their respective service areas in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington; and WHEREAS, Water Utility has requested that SPU provide it with an emergency back-up water supply through an existing intertie connection between SPU's and Water Utility's Water Systems, which will increase reliability for operating Water Utility's Water System during temporary periods when its Water System is impaired or disrupted; and WHEREAS, SPU agrees to use its best efforts to provide Water Utility an emergency back-up water supply under certain terms and conditions from its available existing sources of water supply. NOW THEREFORE, both parties agree as follows: 1. TERM: The initial term of this Agreement shall be for fifty (50) years commencing on January 1, 2012 and expiring on December 31, 2061. 2. DESCRIPTION OF EMERGENCY INTERTIE: SPU will deliver water to Water Utility through service connection(s), which include the water meter and appurtenances ("Emergency Intertie"), as described below and as more particularly described, including the location(s ) and specific operating conditions, in Exhibit I, a copy of which is attached and incorporated herein. Exhibit I may be revised in writing upon mutual agreement of the Director of SPU and the City of Edmonds Director of Public Works, except that SPU may modify the minimum hydraulic gradient once during any fifteen (15) year period upon four (4) �7Z Packet Pg. 222 8.A.a years' advance written notice, unless a shorter notice is agreed to by Water Utility. SPU Facilities include: the outlet from the supply pipeline, the pipeline from the outlet to the meter vault, and the meter vault and its contents. Water Utility Facilities include: everything past the external wall of the meter vault. SPU will provide water for use at the Emergency Intertie at any time except as otherwise allowed by the terms of this Agreement. 3. USE OF EMERGENCY INTERTIE: Water Utility's use of the Emergency Intertie is limited to temporary, emergency backup water supply for up to one week, unless SPU approves a longer period in writing, which will not be unreasonably withheld. The parties agree that in the event a substantially longer period is approved, the Director of SPU may require additional reasonable terms and conditions that will be in effect during the approved longer period. For the purposes of this Agreement, an emergency means an unforeseen event that causes damage or disrupts Water Utility's normal operations of its Water System or requires immediate action to protect public health and safety, which includes fire flow purposes. 4. LIMITATIONS ON USE OF EMERGENCY INTERTIE: a. The Emergency Intertie may not be used to respond to routine or seasonal peak demands or water shortages. b. Before using the Emergency Intertie, Water Utility shall use best efforts to activate its own emergency sources of supply or alternative operations to cope with the emergency. c. SPU will provide water at the point of delivery in accordance with this Agreement during use of the Emergency Intertie as defined in Exhibit I, as revised from time to time. d. Water Utility will endeavor to not exceed flows defined in Exhibit I during use of the Emergency Intertie without specific written authorization by SPU. e. Water Utility may use up to the number of gallons of water per year through the Emergency Intertie identified in Exhibit 1 for administrative purposes only, such as hydrant or valve exercising/testing, flushing or other measures taken to maintain water quality, which is included as part of the Annual Fee ("Administrative Allowance"). The Director of SPU and the City of Edmonds Director of Public Works may revise the Administrative Allowance in Exhibit I as necessary, upon mutual written agreement between the Director of SPU and President of Water Utility. Packet Pg. 223 8.A.a f. Water Utility agrees and acknowledges that in the event of a general emergency or weather -related water shortage affecting SPU's Water System, SPU may interrupt or reduce its deliveries of water to its wholesale customers (except for fire protection), including Water Utility under this Agreement. g. Water Utility agrees and acknowledges that in the event of a general emergency or weather -related water shortage affecting SPU's Water System or the region, SPU may implement emergency water use curtailment measures that impact Water Utility's retail customers' use of water in accordance with its Water Shortage Contingency Plan or other necessary action. Water Utility will assist and support any emergency curtailment measures that are implemented and related to use of the Emergency Intertie. h. Water Utility agrees and acknowledges that SPU may temporarily interrupt use or reduce availability of water through the Emergency Intertie if SPU determines that the interruption or reduction is necessary or reasonable in case of a localized or SPU Water System emergency or in order to perform any required maintenance, improvement, repair, inspection or testing of SPU's Water System. Except in cases of emergency affecting SPU's Water System, SPU will provide Water Utility reasonable notice of any temporary interruptions or reductions and will endeavor to minimize interruptions and reductions of water available through the Emergency Intertie, especially when the Emergency Intertie is in active use by Water Utility. In the case of emergency, SPU will provide Water Utility notice as soon as practicable. 5. NOTIFICATION: Whenever general notice is required or prudent under this Agreement, notice shall be giving to the following representatives, which may be amended in writing: SPU: Wholesale Contracts Manager PO Box 34018 Seattle, WA 98124-4018 206-733-9815 Email: terri.greea@seattle.eov Water Utility: Public Works Director 7110 210th SW Edmonds, WA 98026 425-771-0235 Email: phil.williams@ci.edmonds.wa.us a. Water Utility will verbally notify SPU Operations Control Center at 206-386-1818 whenever the Emergency Intertie is used for emergency use. Water Utility will endeavor 3 Packet Pg. 224 8.A.a to notify SPU within 1 hour after the use of the Emergency Intertie begins, or as soon as practicable, and will state the nature of the emergency and estimated/actual duration. b. Water Utility will send written notice to SPU Wholesale Contracts Manager at the address above within 10 days after each use of the Emergency Intertie, in a form acceptable to SPU, stating the duration and estimated quantity of water use. 6. WATER QUALITY: SPU will provide water to the point of delivery that meets all state and federal drinking water standards and shall be of the same standard and quality as that normally delivered by SPU to its retail and wholesale customers. Water Utility acknowledges and agrees that because the Emergency Intertie is used intermittently, it may result in water being stagnant at the point of delivery for periods of time that may affect water quality. Water Utility is solely responsible for implementing operational best practices, such as flushing the service connection, prior to use of the Emergency Intertie for potable or other use. Water Utility is solely responsible for compliance with all applicable local, state and federal drinking water quality laws and regulations within its Water System. 7. INTERTIE MAINTENANCE: Each utility shall be responsible for maintenance of their portion of the Emergency Intertie as described in Section 2 of this Agreement as SPU and Water Utility Facilities respectively. 8. METER EQUIPMENT: SPU shall own, maintain and pay the cost of the metering equipment for the Emergency Intertie, including periodic inspection and testing. If Seattle changes the location of the intertie connection to Water Utility for Seattle's benefit, then Seattle shall pay the cost of constructing a new wholesale meter installation at the new location. If Water Utility requests the change in location, then Water Utility shall pay the cost of the new connection. 9. EMERGENCY INTERTIE FEES: Water Utility will pay the following charges within 30 days of an invoice from SPU: a. An Annual Fee, paid in advance by January 1 of each calendar year, which covers SPU's expenses to administer this Agreement and the Administrative Allowance for Water Utility under Section 4.e and Exhibit 1 of this Agreement. The Director of SPU may revise the Annual Fee reasonably to account for any change in the Administrative Allowance mutually agreed under Section 4.e above. Each year during the term of this Agreement, the Director of SPU may revise the Annual Fee by the same percentage as the change in the average of the Peak and Off -Peak Commodity Charge Rates from the 4 Packet Pg. 225 8.A.a prior year to the current year then in effect for wholesale customers under Seattle Municipal Code Section 21.04.440.E.2, as it may be amended from time to time. The initial Annual Fee due January 1, 2012 is $4214. SPU will provide 30 days' written notice of any subsequent revisions to the Annual Fee, which will become incorporated herein by this reference at the time the revised Annual Fee becomes effective. b. A Commodity Charge for the metered amount of water used through the Emergency Intertie minus the Administrative Allowance at the then applicable average of the Peak and Off -Peak Commodity Charge Rates in effect for wholesale customers under Seattle Municipal Code Section 21.04.440.E.2, as it may be amended from time to time, plus any emergency surcharge, if applicable generally to the wholesale customers at that time. c. A one-time transaction fee of $1500 is due January 1 2012. d. Any late payment will accrue interest at 1% per month. 10. LIMIT OF LIABILITY: Water Utility understands and agrees that SPU obligations under this Agreement are subject to the limitations herein. SPU shall not be held liable, under any circumstances, for loss or damage from a deficiency or failure to supply water caused by an emergency, unforeseen event, or for any other reason allowed under this Agreement. 11. TERMINATION: Water Utility may terminate this Agreement at any time upon twelve (12) months' written notice to SPU. SPU may terminate this Agreement upon sixty (60) days' written notice to Water Utility that it has materially breached this Agreement and does not cure the material breach within the 60-day cure period, or a longer time period as SPU may approve in writing if Water Utility is making substantial progress towards curing the material breach. In the event of termination under this provision, Water Utility will be responsible for any reasonable costs SPU incurs to disconnect or remove the service connection as may be required by industry or SPU operating practices then in effect. 12. DISPUTE RESOLUTION: If a dispute arises out of or relates to this Agreement, the parties agree to negotiate in good faith to resolve the dispute within 90 days. Unless the parties agree to a longer time, if the dispute remains unresolved after 90 days, the parties agree to try in good faith to settle it by mediation before resorting to arbitration, litigation or some other legal dispute resolution procedure. Venue and jurisdiction shall lie in the King County Superior Court for the State of Washington in Seattle. Packet Pg. 226 8.A.a 13. MISCELLANEOUS. This Agreement represents the entire agreement between the parties concerning the subject matter. This agreement shall be interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington. This agreement will inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the parties and their successors and assigns. If any of this Agreement or its application is determined by a court of law to be illegal, invalid, or void without rendering performance of this Agreement impossible or infeasible, then the Parties intend that the validity of the remaining provisions of this Agreement or their application shall not be affected and shall continue in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereby execute this Agreement. THE CITY OF EDMONDSIWATER UTILITY: Earling, ATTEST: Ch e, City Clerk Phil Williams, Public Works Director Approved as to Form ttorney THE CITY OF SEATTLE: BY: Director, Seattle Public Utilities C. Date: Date: Date: l ( Date: Z 5 it Date: I I Packet Pg. 227 8.A.a O LL W Z U)O Z O � Q J � J Q � Q ^ 0CL O N Z LL v W 0 2 v J IL J a 1JL O — Q ..� H Z H a �(L2 q Lu v w w d Q Z LL O LL 00 2 W O > co ZU)< Z Z N W a W a :1 !L a z9 Z W W 1% W a d o Z LL OW ^ Z N O 0 W Z N w Z p Ci Zw m O Lu V N Z ca CO) z O z Q V J c� o Ln E N N LL Z r- Packet Pg. 228 8.A.a E a� THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK L .N C d L L Q E O U r O N O C O O C N N d L Q. Q Packet Pg. 229 8.A.a C N t v APPENDIX B Packet Pg. 230 8.A.a E a� THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK L .N C d L L Q O U r O N O C O O C N N d L Q. Q Packet Pg. 231 8.A.a I w �st„xngt,r-t0f WATER FACILITIES INVENTORY (WFI) FORM Quarter: 1 r Updated: 03/10/2016 III Hea t th Printed: 12/14/2016 ONE FORM PER SYSTEM WFI Printed For: On -Demand Once of Dri=kiuK Wafer Submission Reason: Pop/Connect Update to RETURN TO: Central Services - WFI, PO Box 47822, Olympia, WA, 98504-7822 a- 1. SYSTEM ID NO. 2. SYSTEM NAME 3. COUNTY 4. GROUP 5. TYPE 22500 U EDMONDS, CITY OF SNOHOMISH A Comm 6. PRIMARY CONTACT NAME & MAILING ADDRESS 7. OWNER NAME & MAILING ADDRESS 8. OWNER NUMBER: 0016£ JIM WAITE [WATER/SEWER MGR] EDMONDS, CITY OF 7110 210TH ST SW JIM WAITE WATER MANAGER EDMONDS, WA 98026-7219 7110 210TH ST SW EDMONDS, WA 98026-7219 STREET ADDRESS IF DIFFERENT FROM ABOVE STREET ADDRESS IF DIFFERENT FROM ABOVE ATTN ATTN ADDRESS ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP CITY STATE ZIP 9.24 HOUR PRIMARY CONTACT INFORMATION 10. OWNER CONTACT INFORMATION Primary Contact Daytime Phone: (425) 771-0235 Owner Daytime Phone: (425) 771-0235 Primary Contact Mobile/Cell Phone: (425) 870-0617 Owner Mobile/Cell Phone: Primary Contact Evening Phone: (xxx)-xxx-xxxx Owner Evening Phone: (xxx)-xxx-xxxx Fax: (425)744-6057 E-mail: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fax: E-mail: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx WAC •i .- 24-hour contact information for emergencies. 11. SATELLITE MANAGEMENT AGENCY - SMA (check only one) X Not applicable (Skip to #12) ❑ Owned and Managed SMA NAME: SMA Number: ❑ Managed Only ❑ Owned Only 12. WATER SYSTEM CHARACTERISTICS (mark all that apply) ❑ Agricultural Hospital/Clinic Residential �[ Commercial / Business ❑ Industrial School �[ Day Care Licensed Residential Facility ❑ Temporary Farm Worker �[ Food Service/Food Permit Lodging P[ Other (church, fire station, etc.): ❑ 1,000 or more person event for 2 or more days per year ❑ Recreational / RV Park 13. WATER SYSTEM OWNERSHIP (mark only one) 14. STORAGE CAPACITY (gall< ❑ Association ❑ County ❑ Investor ❑ Special District City / Town ❑ Federal ❑ Private ❑ State 7,500,000 3 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 to SOURCE NAME INTERTIE SOURCE CATEGORY USE TREATMENT DEPTH SOURCE LOCATI, (n L LIST UTILITY'S NAME FOR SOURCE INTERTIE AND WELL TAG ID NUMBER. SYSTEM ❑ z N j ID W W LU LL W z OJ Example: WELL #1 XYZ456 NUMBER w u J O W w to Z IF SOURCE IS PURCHASED OR F O w z z? z z m d INTERTIED, W o LL Q LL F r F- W O O z LL a } O 1= S LIST SELLER'S NAME w w' ? z J U a z i- O O> O z a_ o Example: SEATTLE w Z LL 0 0� z Z W W Z� o Q = w Q a � z x W N LL Z_ Z_ z_ � LL 22 W' Q Lu F Z LL v Z J J J J J J z W fn W W W O F- 0< O Q W W W Q L) .. +, W W W a' a' Q Q' Z 2 0' Q W O Z J F 2 ❑ () U O a. a. a W 7 Q F W W 2 O 0 2 J J F ? W in in in fn in W O a. N W co z U LL LL O fn F 4) S01 24050E/EVERETT 24050 L X Y X 0 S02 77050Y/SEATTLE 77050 Y X Y X 0 SE SW 31 27N V t4 Q DOH 331-011 (Rev. 06/03) DOH Copy I Packet Pg. 232 8.A.a WATER FACILITIES INVENTORY (WFI) FORM - Continued 1. SYSTEM ID NO. 1 2. SYSTEM NAME 3. COUNTY 4. GROUP 22500 U EDMONDS, CITY OF I SNOHOMISH I A 25. SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES (How many of the following do you have?) A. Full Time Single Family Residences (Occupied 180 days or more per year) B. Part Time Single Family Residences (Occupied less than 180 days per year) 26. MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (How many of the following do you have?) A. Apartment Buildings, condos, duplexes, barracks, dorms B. Full Time Residential Units in the Apartments, Condos, Duplexes, Dorms that are occupied more than 180 days/year C. Part Time Residential Units in the Apartments, Condos, Duplexes, Dorms that are occupied less than 180 days/year 27. NON-RESIDENTIAL CONNECTIONS (How many of the following do you have?) A. Recreational Services and/or Transient Accommodations (Campsites, RV sites, hotel/motel/overnight units) B. Institutional, Commercial/Business, School, Day Care, Industrial Services, etc. 28. TOTAL SERVICE CONNECTIONS 29. FULL-TIME RESIDENTIAL POPULATION A. How many residents are served by this system 180 or more days per year? 32381 ACTIVE CALCULATED SERVICE ACTIVE iNNECTIONS CONNECTION: 9410 8772 0 0 638 0 0 0 789 789 10199 5. TYPE Comm DOH USE OI APPROVE CONNECTI( Unspecifie 30. PART-TIME RESIDENTIAL POPULATION JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DI A. How many part-time residents are present each month? B. How many days per month are they present? 31. TEMPORARY & TRANSIENT USERS JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DI A. How many total visitors, attendees, travelers, campers, patients or customers have access to the water system each month? B. How many days per month is water accessible to the public? 32. REGULAR NON-RESIDENTIAL USERS JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DI A. If you have schools, daycares, or businesses connected to your water system, how many students daycare children and/or employees are present each month? B. How many days per month are they present? 33. ROUTINE COLIFORM SCHEDULE Requirement is exception from WAC 246-290 JAN 30 FEB 30 ]30 APR 30 MAY 30 JUN 30 JUL 30 AUG 30 SEP 30 OCT 30 NOV 30 DI 34. NITRATE SCHEDULE (One Sample per source by time period) QUARTERLY ANNUALLY ONCE EVERY 3 YEARS 35. Reason for Submitting WFI: ❑ Update - Change ❑ Update - No Change Inactivate [-]Re-Activate ❑ Name Change ❑ New System [-]Other 36. 1 certify that the information stated on this WFI form is correct to the best of my knowledge. SIGNATURE: DATE: PRINT NAME: TITLE: DOH 331-011 (Rev. 06/03) DOH Copy Packet Pg. 233 WS ID WS Name 22500 EDMONDS, CITY OF 8.A.a Total WFI Printed: 1 DOH 331-011 (Rev. 06/03) DOH Copy I Packet Pg. 234 8.A.a E a� THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK L .N C d L L Q O U r O N O C O O C N N d L Q. Q Packet Pg. 235 8.A.a C N t v APPENDIX C Packet Pg. 236 8.A.a E a� THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK L .N C d L L Q O U r O N O C O O C N N d L Q. Q Packet Pg. 237 City of Edmonds Comprehensive Water System Plan Pressure Reducing Station Data 8.A.a Station Number Station Location Control Valve Size (in) Normal Pressure Upper Pressure Zone Lower Pressure Zone Main Bypass Inlet (psi) Outlet (psi) # 2 68th & North Meadowdale Road 4 N/A 72 33 596 500 # 3 72nd & North Meadowdale Road 6 2 132 52 500 325 # 5 7082 Meadowdale Beach Road 6 2.5 130 90 596 500 # 6 74th & Meadowdale Beach Road 6 2 144 63 500 325 # 7 76th Ave W & Braemar Drive (E side of 76th) 6 2 100 52 425 325 # 8 76th Ave W & 176th St SW (NE Corner) 6 2 160 85 596 425 # 9 76th Ave W & 188th (W side of 76th) 8 2 125 50 596 425 # 10 80th Ave & 184th St SW (SW Corner) 8 4 115 82 596 505 # 13 88th Ave W & 185th Place SW 4 1.5 110 60 596 505 # 14 8900 188th St SW 4 1.5 108 55 596 505 # 15 8927 192nd St SW 4 1.5 110 57 596 505 # 16 19822 Maplewood Drive 6 1.5 105 52 596 486 # 17 Main St & Skyline Drive 6 2 102 46 596 486 # 18 Olympic Ave & Bell St 6 2 94 65 486 420 # 20 6th Ave S & Elm Way 8 2 115 48 486 325 # 21 9th Ave S & Pine St (OFF LINE) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A # 23 12th & Viewland 6 2 150 72 596 420 # 24 Olympic View Dr & 76th (Throttle Control Valve) 6 2 135 100 505 425 ti r N 3 A) m c m IM Q ti O N d C 7 7 C R d E N r N L CD r 2M 7 N C O E W C N E t v tC Q H:\EVT_Projects\15\1662 Edm WSP\EXCEL\VALVES packet Pg. 238 8.A.a E a� THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK L .N C d L L Q E O U r O N O C O O C N N d L Q. Q Packet Pg. 239 8.A.a C N t v APPENDIX D Packet Pg. 240 8.A.a E a� THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK L .N C d L L Q O U r O N O C O O C N N d L Q. Q Packet Pg. 241 4F�kingfun StulcIkparfm^af u' A4 Health 8.A.a Local Government Consistency Determination Form Water System Name: City of Edmonds PWS ID: 22500 Planning/Engineering Document Title: Water System Plan Plan Date: Local Government with Jurisdiction Conducting Review: City of Edmonds Before the Department of Health (DOH) approves a planning or engineering submittal under Section 100 or Section 110, the local government must review the documentation the municipal water supplier provides to prove the submittal is consistent with local comprehensive plans, land use plans and development regulations (WAC 246-290-108). Submittals under Section 105 require a local consistency determination if the municipal water supplier requests a water right place -of -use expansion. The review must address the elements identified below as they relate to water service. By signing this form, the local government reviewer confirms the document under review is consistent with applicable local plans and regulations. If the local government reviewer identifies an inconsistency, he or she should include the citation from the applicable comprehensive plan or development regulation and explain how to resolve the inconsistency, or confirm that the inconsistency is not applicable by marking N/A. See more instructions on reverse. For use by water For use by local system government Local Government Consistent Statement y e Identify the page(s) in Yes or submittal Not Applicable a) The water system service area is consistent with the adopted land use Fig. 2-3 & and zoning within the service area. Fig. 3-1 b) The growth projection used to forecast water demand is consistent pages 3-3 with the adopted city or county's population growth projections. If a different growth projection is used, provide an explanation of the to 3-4 & alternative growth projection and methodology. 4-10 c) For cities and towns that provide water service: All water service area policies of the city or town described in the plan conform to all Pages 5-1 & relevant utility service extension ordinances. 5-2 d) Service area policies for new service connections conform to the adopted local plans and adopted development regulations of all Pages 5-1 & cities and counties with jurisdiction over the service area. 5-2 e) Other relevant elements related to water supply are addressed in the water system plan, if applicable. This may include Coordinated Water Not Not System Plans, Regional Wastewater Plans, Reclaimed Water Plans, Groundwater Management Area Plans, and the Capital Facilities Applicable Applicable Element of local comprehensive plans. I certify that the above statements are true to the best of my knowledge and that these specific elements are consistent with adopted local plans and development regulations. Signature Printed Name, Title, & Jurisdiction Date Packet Pg. 242 8.A.a Consistency Review Guidance For Use by Local Governments and Municipal Water Suppliers This checklist may be used to meet the requirements of WAC 246-290-108. When using an alternative format, it must describe all of the elements; la), b), c), d), and e), when they apply. For water system plans (WSP), a consistency review is required for the service area and any additional areas where a municipal water supplier wants to expand its water right's place of use. For small water system management programs, a consistency review is only required for areas where a municipal water supplier wants to expand its water right's place -of -use. If no water right place -of -use expansion is requested, a consistency review is not required. For engineering documents, a consistency review is required for areas where a municipal water supplier wants to expand its water right's place -of -use (water system plan amendment is required). For noncommunity water systems, a consistency review is required when requesting a place -of -use expansion. All engineering documents must be submitted with a service area map (WAC 246-290- 110(4)(b)(ii)). A) Documenting Consistency: The planning or engineering document must include the following when applicable. a) A copy of the adopted land use/zoning map corresponding to the service area. The uses provided in the WSP should be consistent with the adopted land use/zoning map. Include any other portions of comprehensive plans or development regulations that relate to water supply planning. b) A copy of the growth projections that correspond to the service area. If the local population growth projections are not used, explain in detail why the chosen projections more accurately describe the expected growth rate. Explain how it is consistent with the adopted land use. c) Include water service area policies and show that they are consistent with the utility service extension ordinances within the city or town boundaries. This applies to cities and towns only. d) All service area policies for how new water service will be provided to new customers. e) Other relevant elements the Department of Health determines are related to water supply planning. See Local Government Consistency — Other Relevant Elements, Policy B.07, September 2009. B) Documenting an Inconsistency: Please document the inconsistency, include the citation from the comprehensive plan or development regulation, and explain how to resolve the inconsistency. C) Documenting a Lack of Local Review for Consistency: Where the local government with jurisdiction did not provide a consistency review, document efforts made and the amount of time provided to the local government for review. Please include: name of contact, date, and efforts made (letters, phone calf and emails). To self -certify, please contact the DOH Planner. The Department of Health is an equal opportunity agency. For persons with disabilities, this document is available on request in other formats. To submit a request, please call 1-800-525-0127 (TTY 1-800-833-6388). February 2016 Page 2 of 2 Packet Pg. 243 8.A.a C N t v APPENDIX E Packet Pg. 244 8.A.a E a� THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK L .N C d L L Q O U r O N O C O O C N N d L Q. Q Packet Pg. 245 OF EDAf O #P71 8.A.a Purpose of Checklist. CITY OF EDMONDS ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Use of checklist for nonproject proposals: For nonproject proposals complete this checklist and the supplemental sheet for nonproject actions (Part D). the lead agency may exclude any question for the environmental elements (Part B) which they determine do not contribute meaningfully to the analysis of the proposed nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: City of Edmonds Comprehensive Water System Plan 2. Name of applicant: 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Michele (Mike) De Lilla, Senior Utilities Engineer, 121 5t3i Ave N, Edmonds, WA 98020 (425-771-0220) 4. Date checklist prepared: June 15, 2017. 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Edmonds 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): The Edmonds OLE Council and the Edmonds Planninz board will each hold a public hearing on the Water System Plan in the Summer of 2017. Projects in the Plan will be implemented over the twentE-vear planning horizon. Q Revised on 9116116 2017- SEPA Checklist Water Comp Plan.doc Page I of 21 Packet Pg. 246 8.A.a (STAFF 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. Yes. Capital improvements are idenh aed in the plan and scheduled to occur over the next twenty years. (STAFF COMMENTS) 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. SEPA checklist for adoption of the Comprehensive Water System Plan. Environmental review for projects identified in the plan will be conducted as necessary. (STAFF COMMENTS) 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. None. (STAFF COMMENTS) 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Edmonds City Council Adoption Approval from the Washington State Department of Health (STAFF COMMENTS) 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. The Comprehensive Water System Plan is a planning document used to evaluatethe City of Edmonds water system and plan future improvements for ten and twen(y year planning horizons. The plan describes the water system in detail, including sources of water, treatment, and distribution. An improvement program is established based on projected system needs. The plan also looks at a conservation program, water system standards, operations and maintenance. (STAFF COMMENTS) Revised on 9119116 2017- SEPA Checklist Water Comp Plan.doc Page 2 of 21 Packet Pg. 247 8.A.a 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The City of Edmonds retail water service area is within the city limits with the boundary defined by the city limits, except for the southwest portion of the City that is served by the Olympric View Water & Sewer District. These limits are generally defined as the area that extends north to Meadowdale Beach Park, south to 244" Street SW along the Snohomish/King County boundary, and west to Puget Sound. The easter boundary of the city limits generally ollows Olympifc View Drive, 76`h Ave West, and Highway 99 except for a small portion of the city bounded on the west by Hikhway 99 and Lake Ballinger to the east between 220`h Street SW and 244" Street SW (STAFF COMMENTS) TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other: The City's water service area is located in a relatively hilly portion of southwest Snohomish County. The him elevation in the City is in the southeast corner at over 450 feet. The topography of the City' service area generally slopes downward from east to west toward Puget Sound with the exception of the southwest corner o, the service area which slopes down toward Lake Balling (STAFF COMMENTS) b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? Greater than 40% (STAFF COMMENTS) C. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, and muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any agricultural land of long term commercial significance and whether the proposal results in removing any of these soils. County soil survey mapping developed by the Natural Resource Conservation Service (MRCS) indicate that the predominant soils found across the City are Alderwood gravelly sandy loam, and Alderwood urban land complex. Other soils with a much smaller extend include Kitsap silt loam, McKenna gravelly silt loam and Mukilteo muck. (STAFF COMMENTS) Revised on 9119116 2017- SEPA Checklist Water Comp Plan.doc Page 3 of 21 Packet Pg. 248 8.A.a d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. Yes, particularly in the Earth Subsidence and Landslide Hazard Area in the Meadowdale Beach area of the City. (STAFF COMMENTS) e. Describe the purpose, type, total area and approximate quantities and total affected area of any filling, excavation, and grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Not applicable. (STAFF COMMENTS) f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Minor erosion may occur during construction ofsystem maintenance/improvementproiects identified in the plan. (STAFF COMMENTS) g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Not applicable. (STAFF COM h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Construction of temporary erosion and sediment control plans will be developed for construction activities and best management practices used to minimize and control erosion. (STAFF COMMENTS) 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, and industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Not applicable. (STAFF COM b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may effect your proposal? if so, generally describe. Not applicable. (STAFF COMMENTS) Revised on 9119116 2017- SEPA Checklist Water Comp Plan.doc Page 4 of 21 Packet Pg. 249 8.A.a C. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to the, if any: None. (STAFF COMMENTS) 3. WATER a. Surface: (1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, and wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. The City of Edmonds sits along the eastern shores of Puget Sound and contains a number of relatively small streams including Willow Creek, Shellabarger Creek, Shell Creek, Hindley Creek, Northstream, Fruitdale Creek, Perrinville Creek, Meadowdale Creek, and a number of smaller unnamed creeks. Portions ofLake Ballinger are also located within the City ofEdmonds' jurisdiction. (STAFF C (2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No. (STAFF C (3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None. (STAFF COMMENTS) (4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. The City currently supplies its entire system through the Alderwood Supply Station with water purchased from Alderwood Water & Wastewater District (AWWD), which in turn purchases the water from the City of Everett. The Everett raw water supply originates in the Spada Reservoir created by the Culmback Dam on the Sultan River, approximately 25 miles east of Everett. The raw water passes through the Snohomish county PUD No.I Power House prior to entering the Chaplain Reservoir. The water from this reservoir is delivered to the Everett Water Filtration Plant prior to delivery to the City of Everett, AWWD, the City of Edmonds, and several other water systems in Snohomish County. (STAFF COMMENTS) Revised on 9119116 2017- SEPA Checklist Water Comp Plan.doc Page 5 of 21 Packet Pg. 250 8.A.a b. C. (5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. There are limited areas within the city limits within the 100 ;year floodplain as identified in FEMA's Flood Insurance Rate Maps. Some areas identified include limited areas along Puget Sound, around Lake Ballinger, and the mouth of Shell Creek north of Caspers Street. (STAFF COMMENTS) (6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. (STAFF COMMENTS) Ground: (1) Will ground water be withdrawn from a well for drinking water or other purposes? If so, give a general description of the well, proposed uses and approximate quantities withdrawn from the well Will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Alderwood Water and Wastewater District has an artesian well on 164' Street which ,flows at a rate of approximately 10 gallons per minute. This well is maintained as a courtesy to residents who want untreated water, but the well is not connected to the water system that serves the City ofEdmonds. (STAFF COMMENTS (2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. Not applicable. (STAFF COMMENTS) Water Runoff (including storm water): (1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Not applicable. (STAFF COMMENTS) Revised on 9119116 2017- SEPA Checklist Water Comp Plan.doc Page 6 of 21 Packet Pg. 251 8.A.a (2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. Not applicable. (STAFF COMMENTS) (3) Does the proposal alter or otherwise affect drainage patterns in the vicinity of the site? If so, describe. No. (STAFF COMMENTS) d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, runoff water, and drainage pattern impacts, if any: None. (STAFF COMMENTS) 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: X deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other: X evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other: X shrubs X grass pasture crop or grain Orchards, vineyards or other permanent crops X wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other: X water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other: other types of vegetation: (STAFF COMMENTS) b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? None. (STAFF COMMENTS) Revised on 9119116 2017- SEPA Checklist Water Comp Plan.doc Page 7 of 21 Packet Pg. 252 8.A.a 5. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. No threatened or endangered plant species are known to be located within the City of Edmonds. Washing State Department of Natural Resources natural heritage site data does not show any rare, threatened, or endangeredplant species in the City ofEdmonds. (STAFF COMMENTS) d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other materials to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: None. (STAFF COMMENTS) e. List all noxious weeds and invasive species known to be on or near the site. This is a not a site specific project. Some noxius/invasive plants may exist as listed in Washington State's Noxious Weeds That Harm Washington State (Western Washington Guide) http://www.nwcb.wa.goy/pdfs/WestemFieldGuide.12df (STAFF COMMENTS) Animals a. List any birds and other animals that have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near b. the site. Examples include: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: Hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: Salmon, Killer Whale, Trout (STAFF COMMENTS) List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Puget Sound contains a number of threatened and endangeredspecies including: Southern Resident Killer Whale (Orcinus orca) Puget Sound DPS steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) Puget Sound ESU Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) Revised on 9119116 2017- SEPA Checklist Water Comp Plan.doc Page 8 of 21 Packet Pg. 253 8.A.a 6. Steller sea lion (Eumetopias jubatus) (STAFF COMMENTS) C. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Edmonds is located within the Pacific Flyway. (STAFF COMMENTS) d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None. (STAFF COMMENTS) e. List any invasive animal species known to be on or near the site. This is not a site specific project. Some invasive animal species may exist as listed in Washington State Aquatic Nuisance Species Committee Report to the 2012 Legislature. (STAFF COMMENTS) Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electricity is necessary to run pump stations. (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. C. No. (STAFF COMMENTS) What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: None. (STAFF COMMENTS) Revised on 9119116 2017- SEPA Checklist Water Comp Plan.doc Page 9 of 21 Packet Pg. 254 8.A.a 7 Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so describe. The water is treated at the Everett Water Filtration Plant with chlorine and fluoride. The 41derwood Water and Wastewater District also chlorinates the water at its reservoir sites to ensure sufficient chlorine residual throughout the distribution system. (STAFF COMMENTS) (1) Describe any known or possible contamination at the site from present or past uses. None. (STAFF COMMENTS) (2) Describe existing hazardous chemicals/conditions that might affect project development and design. This includes underground hazardous liquid and gas transmission pipelines located within the project area and in the vicinity. Not applicable. (STAFF COMMENTS) (3) Describe any toxic or hazardous chemicals that might be stored, used, or produced during the project's development or constructions, or at any time during the operating life of the project. None. (STAFF COMMENTS) (4) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None. (STAFF COMMENTS) (5) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: The City of Everett provides source water quality monitoring for its surface water source. The City o� Edmonds provides the required quality monitoring of its distribution system in accourdance with WAC 246-290-300. (STAFF C Revised on 9119116 2017- SEPA Checklist Water Comp Plan.doc Page 10 of 21 Packet Pg. 255 8.A.a 8. b. Noise (1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? None. (STAFF COMMENTS) (2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hour's noise would come from the site. None. (STAFF COMMENTS) (3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None. (STAFF COMMENTS) Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Will the proposal affect current land uses on nearby or adjacent properties? If so, describe. Single familv residential uses are relativelv evenlv dispersed throughtout the citv ando ccunv the maiority of the city's land use base. Approximately 3,100 acres, or SS percent of the City's area is developed° or single familX residential uses. Higher density residential development (including apartments and condominiums) are primarily located south and north of the downtown; in the vicinity of the Edmonds-Woodway High School site and Swedish Hospital; and adjacent to 196t' Street, 76`h Avenue and Highway 99. Together, single family and milti family residential units comprise approximately 3,400 acres (nearly 60 percent of the total land in the CiW. Commercial activity is concentrated in two principal areas the Downtown/Waterfront and the Highway 99 corridor (which includes the retail and medical development in the vicinity of Swedish Hospital). Smaller commercial nodes that primarily serve adjacent neighborhoods are located at the intersection of Edmonds Way (5R104) and 100' Avenue/9' Avenue (Westgate) and at 212`h Street184' Avenue (S Corners The Port of Edmonds is located in the southern portion of the city's waterfront. The Port owns and manages 33 upland acres as well as a small boat harbor and marina, with space for 1,000 boats proximately 11 acres The Port's property is occupied by approximately 80 businesses including office uses located in Harbor Square. ADDroximately 258 acres of narks and oven space lands are owned or operated by the Citv. while there are another 229 acres of County owned parks and open space land in the Edmonds area. Regional parks and beaches figure prominently in the City, including Brackett's Landing North and South, the Edmonds Fishing Pier, Edmonds Memorial Cemetery, Edmonds Underwater Park, Marina Beach Park, Olympic Beach Park, local tidelands, and the South County Senior Center. The Edmonds Marsh is a significant City owned open space (23 Revised on 9119116 2017- SEPA Checklist Water Comp Plan.doc Page 11 of 21 Packet Pg. 256 acres), while Yost Memorial Park is the largest community park owned by the City_(48 acres). The largest County resources are Southwest County Park (120 acres) and Meadowdale Beach County Park (95 acres). Overall approximately 96 percent of the City is developed. (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Has the project site been used as working farmlands or working forest lands? If so, describe. How much agricultural or forest land of long-term commercial significance will be converted to other uses as a result of the proposal, if any? If resource lands have not been designated, how many acres in farmland or forest land tax status will be converted to nonfarm or nonforest use? No. (STAFF COMMENTS) (1) Will the proposal affect or be affected by surrounding working farm or forest land normal business operations, such as oversize equipment access, the application of pesticides, tilling, and harvesting? If so, how: No. (STAFF COMMENTS) C. Describe any structures on the site. Typical urban development. (STAFF COMMENTS) d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No. (STAFF COMMENTS) e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Varies depending on location within the City of Edmonds. U (STAFF COMMENTS) What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Varies depending on location within the City of Edmonds. (STAFF COMMENTS) Revised on 9119116 2017- SEPA Checklist Water Comp Plan.doc Page 12 of 21 Packet Pg. 257 8.A.a g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master plan designation of the site? Varies depending on location within the City of Edmonds. Shoreline areas are along Puget Sound and Lake Balling (STAFF COMMENTS) h. Has any part of the site been classified critical area by the city? If so, specify. Critical Areas are defined in ECDC 23.40 through ECDC 23.90. (STAFF COMMENTS) Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? The City of Edmonds population currently is approximately 40,000 with a proiected population of 46,000. The population located within the service area is approximately 32,000. Pro'et cted population within the service area at the end of the twentx year planning horizon is 36,800. (STAFF COMMENTS) j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None. (STAFF COMMENTS) k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None. (STAFF COMMENTS) Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The plans and policies of the City of Edmonds and Snohomish County must be consistent in accordance with GMA pursuant to RCW 36.70A.100. The GMA also requires consistency with the implementation of water system plans and comprehensive plans pursuant to RCW 36.70A.120. The Municipal Water Law, which became effective in 2003, also requires consistency of water system plans with local plans and regulations. Confirmation of consistency under this law is achieved by means of Completing the Consistency Statement Checklist, which must be included with all water system plans. (STAFF COMMENTS) Revised on 9119116 2017- SEPA Checklist Water Comp Plan -doe Page 13 of 21 Packet Pg. 258 8.A.a In. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts to agricultural and forest lands of long-term commercial significance, if any: Not applicable. (STAFF COMMENTS) 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None. (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Approximately how many units, if any would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None. (STAFF COMMENTS) C. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None. (STAFF COMMENTS) 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principle exterior building material(s) proposed? The existing Five Corners 3.0 MG Reservoir is approximately 50 feet tall. (STAFF COMMENTS) b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None. (STAFF COMMENTS) Revised on 9119116 2017- SEPA Checklist Water Comp Plan.doc Page 14 of 21 Packet Pg. 259 8.A.a C. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: None. (STAFF COMMENTS) 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? None. (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No. (STAFF COMMENTS) C. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None. (STAFF COMMENTS) d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: None. (STAFF COMMENTS) 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? A number of recreational opportunities are available through the City of Edmonds including a number of City Parks, a dive park, beaches along Puget Sound, and numerous festivals held in the City thoughout the year. (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreation uses? if so, describe. No. (STAFF COMMENTS) Revised on 9119116 2017- SEPA Checklist Water Comp Plan.doc Page 15 of 21 Packet Pg. 260 8.A.a C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None. (STAFF COMMENTS) 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any buildings, structures, or sites located on or near the site that are over 45 years old listed in, or eligible for listing in national, state, or local preservation registers? If so, specifically describe. There are a number of places and/or structures on the state and local historical registers which include several residences, a cemetery, and a Carnegie Library. (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Are there any landmarks, features, or other evidence of Indian or historic use or occupation? This may include human burials or old cemeteries. Are there any material evidence, artifacts, or areas of cultural importance on or near the site? Please list any professional studies conducted at the site to identify such resources. None known. (STAFF COMMENTS) C. Describe the methods used to assess the potential impacts to cultural and historic resources on or near the project site. Examples include consultation with tribes and the Department of Archeology and Historic Preservation, archaeological surveys, historic maps, GIS date, etc. Not applicable. (STAFF COMMENTS) d. Proposed measures to avoid, minimize, or compensate for loss, changes to, and disturbance to resources. Please include plans for the above and any permits that may be required. None. (STAFF COMMENTS) Revised on 9119116 2017- SEPA Checklist Water Comp Plan.doc Page 16 of 21 Packet Pg. 261 8.A.a 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site or affected geographic area, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Numerous streets throughout the City. Main arterials include State Route 104, State Route 524, and Hi�y 99. (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Is the site or affected geographic area currently served by public transit? If so, generally describe. If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Yes. Ferry, train, and bus. (STAFF COMMENTS) C. How many additional parking spaces would the completed project or nonproject proposal have? How many would the project or proposal eliminate? None. (STAFF COMMENTS) d. Will the proposal require any new or improvements to existing roads, streets, pedestrian, bicycle or state transportation facilities not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No. (STAFF COMMENTS) e. Will the project or proposal use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. The Water System Plan identifies a number of improvements to the system, including water main projects. The selection and implementation of these water main proiects will be accomplished annually by the City, utilizing a priority ranking system. This provides the City with ,flexibility to coordinate water main projects with street or other proiects that may be planned for the same area. (STAFF COMMENTS) f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur and what percentage of the volume would be trucks (such as commercial and passenger vehicles). What data or transportation models were used to make these estimates? None. (STAFF COMMENTS) Revised on 9119116 2017- SEPA Checklist Water Comp Plan -doe Page 17 of 21 Packet Pg. 262 8.A.a g. Will the proposal interfere with, affect or be affected by the movement of agricultural and forest products on roads or streets in the area? If so, generally describe. No. (STAFF COMMENTS) h. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: None. (STAFF COMMENTS) 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, public transit, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No. (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any: None. (STAFF COMMENTS) 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other: All utilites are available within the QU ofEdmonds. (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. The water system plan describes how the City ofEdmonds will provide water to its service area. (STAFF COMMENTS) Revised on 9119116 2017- SEPA Checklist Water Comp Plan -doe Page 18 of 21 Packet Pg. 263 8.A.a C. SIGNATURE I declare under penalty of perjury laws that the above answers are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature of Proponent Date Submitted Revised on 9119116 2017- SEPA Checklist Water Comp Plan.doc Page 19 of 21 Packet Pg. 264 8.A.a D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? Replacement of pipes and other repairs to the water system in the ,future will result in normal construction noise and construction vehicles and equipment would also temporarily increase emissions to the air. Proposal measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: Construction protects must comply with the City's noise abatement and control regulations in ECC 5.30. 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? The improvements recommended in the water system plan are not anticipated to affect plants, animals, °fish, or marine life. Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: None. 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Water use within the service area is erected to grow with projected increases in population. Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: Conservation measures will help reduce water use and water demand. 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? Neither the water system plan nor improvements recommended in the plan are anticipated to ae(fect environmentally sensitive or protected areas. Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: None. 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? The water system plan is consistent with land use plans adopted by the City of Edmonds and Snohomish County and will not allow or encourage incompatible land uses. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: None. 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? The improvements recommended in the water system plan are primarily infrastructure improvements of the existing system. U The improvements are also planned to meet the anticipated needs of growth. The water system plan is not expected to increase Q demand. Revised on 9119116 2017- SEPA Checklist Water Comp Plan.doc Page 20 of 21 Packet Pg. 265 8.A.a Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: The Water Division has developed a preventive maintenance program to ensure all critical components of the water system are properly functioningand nd rely maintained for longtperformance and reliabilit. 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. It is not anticipated that improvements recommended in the plan will conflict with existingLgulations. All improvements will be coordinated with local, state, and federal agencies for appropriate permits. Revised on 9119116 2017- SEPA Checklist Water Comp Plan.doc Page 21 of 21 Packet Pg. 266 8.A.a C N t v APPENDIX F Packet Pg. 267 8.A.a E a� THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK L .N C d L L Q O U r O N O C O O C N N d L Q. Q Packet Pg. 268 8.A.a City of Edmonds Water Use Efficiency Program January 2017 Packet Pg. 269 8.A.a Current Water Conservation Program The City of Edmonds has been an active participant in the Everett Water Utilities Water Conservation Program since the late 1990's. In addition, other programs specific to Edmonds have been ongoing as well, including leak detection surveys, an annual water main replacement program, and bills showing water consumption history. A summary of these programs is as follows: Leak Detection Surveys — The city has leak detection equipment and has an ongoing leak detection program. Once leaks are identified, they are repaired as soon as possible. Water Main Replacement Program — Each year the City replaces approximately 1.5 miles of the distribution system. Bills Showing Consumption History — Customer bills that provide historical water consumption data allow customers to understand how their use varies throughout the year. This information helps customers make informed choices about how they manage their water use, including implementing conservation. The City's customer bills depict consumption data for the preceding year, in 2-month increments, shown on a simple bar graph (see example below). Meter # Prev Read 1 Prev Raed 2 Prev Read 3 Curr Cate Czar Read 1 Curr Read 2 Curr Read 3 TOTAL 2015 1,129 0 0 5125=17 1,143 0 0 14 LIMThe property owners legelly responsible for all chIngee On th s bdi A L 001111 11 ITPA, Fir I SREMAIN AGAINST THE PROPERTY EVEN IF THERE Water usdye IS CHANGE IN OWNERSHIP. m 14 TERMS- This hill is cone:dered dehnquerfl if not paid in full by the Due Date. To make m 12 __ _ _ a paymern you may use our payment drep bar Iccated at Cry Hall. 121 SM Avenue, pay in 10 -- patron at City Hall rrfaa.i,nira l your payment, 00 a on�tima payment or enrtlH for autofri pap '— - ` ' — onEd line ar nar%dsI Jill W eyman*com. ChecXs or Money Orders should be made payahre to Ilia 7 B 7 -- - — - — - — - Cily of Edmond4 u p 4 $ REISlriNMITEdF;1;' If paymert is relurred unpaid by yaw bank, iepayrnent will be required in the 4 - 3 form �f cash moray order, Cashier a chec[ or de bVcmd-t card along wilh a M 00 returnee Flew fee 16 2_ I` me payment WAG made alter IN Due Das In avo•d h:m nd. err rice wilt he dis hneded immediately in ❑ ❑ and atl7!4owal charges wiV 4e applied to fhe account. Z S7 Q M X z Ep UNQUeNCY_ Once the accaurn Matt as de;mquenl it Nn li he sutgw [o a 525 Dl] penalt y 0 d LL �elinquam accounts may have IN Water discoirevod ah Yor Ilen f led a�aln3 the CraGM1Y Each Unit= 7 OOcf= 746 gallons CITY OF EDMONDS • 121 STH AVE N • EDMONOS, WA 20020. 426.77141241 Pay your pill or enroll for automatic payments online at EdmandsUtilit Pay ments.00m School -Based Education — As part of the regional Everett Water Utility Committee (EWUC), the City participates in school -based education programs, including classroom presentations, teacher workshops, and classroom educational materials. The classroom presentations are facilitated by trained instructors with curriculum designed for elementary, middle school, and high school students. The presentations are marketed to teachers through newsletters and other communications. Packet Pg. 270 8.A.a The teacher workshops assist teachers who educate students about water resource issues, including conservation. Teachers participate in activities, experiments, and go on field trips. Teachers can receive continuing education credits or clock hours. The classroom educational materials include a broad collection of items such as books, videos, posters and other supplies. Public Outreach — As part of the regional EWUC program, the City engages in general public outreach intended to build and reinforce a water conservation ethic among customers. These efforts include distribution of brochures, a summer watering calendar, transit advertising, and other regional efforts. The City distributes several educational brochures developed by Everett and its wholesale partners. For example, the "Everyday Conservation" brochure provides conservation tips for inside and outside the home, the "Smart Watering" brochure contains information on efficient lawn and garden watering techniques, and the "Growing Healthy Soil" brochure has information on how soil can be improved as a means of reducing water use. The City also has a summer watering calendar available each year for customers that encourages them to water every third day (staggered, based on their street address). This effort helps to reduce the daily peak demand for water in the summer by decreasing the amount of watering that occurs on a given day. Transit advertising is employed to convey conservation messaging. Billboards promoting various conservation themes have been posted on buses during the summer months when demand peaks. It is estimated that these billboards are seen by over 75 percent of the residents in the service area of Everett and its wholesale partners each year. The City, through EWUC, plays an active role in regional organizations that promote water conservation. EWUC has been an active member of the Partnership for Water Conservation and it predecessor, the Water Conservation Coalition of Puget Sound, for over a decade. Indoor Retrofit Kits — As part of the regional EWUC program, the City has offered free indoor water conservation kits to residential customers since 2001. The kits target homes constructed before 1993 and are designed to encourage customers to upgrade their fixtures to current efficiency standards. In 1993, the National Plumbing Code of 1991 was adopted in Washington State and increased efficiency standards for household water fixtures. The kits are marketed through announcements in local newspapers, the city's newsletter, and through other local online news sources. The kits include a low -flow showerhead and two faucet aerators. The kits are estimated to save 34 gallons of water per day. These estimates are conservative and do not attribute any 2 Packet Pg. 271 8.A.a savings to leak reduction or behavioral changes, both of which are likely to occur. Approximately 1260 kits have been distributed to City of Edmonds residents beginning 2007-2015. Outdoor Irrigation Items — As part of the EWUC program, the City has offered free outdoor water conservation items to residential customers since 2001. The items target households with irrigated landscape areas, primarily single family homes that do not have automatic irrigation systems. The items are designed to encourage customers to reduce watering and other outdoor water use. Studies indicate most households overwater their landscape area by 15 to 20 percent. The items are marketed through announcements in local newspapers, the city newsletter, and through other local online sources. The items include an automatic shut-off watering timer for use with lawn sprinkler or drip hose, an adjustable spray hose nozzle, and a soil moisture meter. These items are estimated to save an average of 40 gallons of water per day. Approximately 1900 outdoor items have been distributed to City of Edmonds residents beginning 2007-2015. School Irrigation System Audits — As art of the regional EWUC program, the Everett Water Utility began offering a school irrigation audit and upgrade program in 2001. The program is targeted at schools with large irrigation demands. Most schools have large sport fields that require significant watering in the summer. The irrigation demand at schools with multiple fields can account for three quarters of their annual water consumption. The irrigation audits are designed to improve efficiency of irrigation systems, resulting in great water savings. The audits are conducted by a professional irrigation system auditor and identify equipment upgrades and/or operational changes that will result in decreased water use. Average savings are estimated to be 20 to 25 percent of the annual irrigation demand. Financial assistance, in the form of a 50 percent cost share, is available to provide incentive to the schools to follow through on the audit recommendations. The Edmonds School District was one of the districts that took advantage of the offer for the audits and subsequently implemented some measures since 2003. After installing a Maxicom comprehensive irrigation controller, the district reported savings of 0.006 million gallons per day (MGD) at the Edmonds-Woodway High School and a savings of 0.007 MGD at the Chase Lake Elementary School. Both schools are within the City of Edmonds. 3 Packet Pg. 272 8.A.a Water Use Efficiency Goal Establishment During the previous 2010 Water Comprehensive Plan Update, city staff gave a public presentation on the plan, including information on the water conservation program in effect at the time. At the August 3rd, 2010 Edmonds City Council Meeting, staff advised the council, and the general public, of the requirement to obtain public comment on water use efficiency measures which would benefit the City of Edmonds. The goal is to reduce average annual water consumption by a minimum of one percent on a per capita basis and participate in Everett's regional water efficiency program. On April 6tn, 2010 City staff discussed with the council alternative water utility rate structures. The City currently uses a uniform utility rate structure. The discussion included inclining block and seasonal rate charges. The conclusion was to continue with the uniform utility rate structure since the conservation goal is being met. Estimated Annual Savings — The estimated conservation savings the City will have while participating in the regional conservation program will be a 2 percent reduction in water demand. Distribution System Leakage — Based on 2016 water consumption records, the overall non - revenue water amount equates to 10.88 percent, with a 3-year average of 9.1 percent average of the total water supplied by the Alderwood Water District and Seattle Public Utility (SPU) master meters. The City will continue to monitor its records to provide documentation that the overall system leakage remains below 10 percent. Planned Water Use Efficiency Measures for 2014-2019 — The City will continue to participate with the Everett Water Utility Regional Conservation Program. This program, as demonstrated by the City of Everett, is shown to be very cost effective. The cost is included in the wholesale water pricing to Edmonds and equates to one percent of the average water bill. A summary of the planned water use efficiency measures is as follows: Leak detection surveys — The City will continue to survey the water system for leaks. Water main replacement program — The City will continue this program at a cost of approximately $2 million annually. Bills showing water consumption history — The City will continue to provide this information and offer ways for customers to obtain additional information via the city website. 4 Packet Pg. 273 8.A.a School -based education — As part of the regional EWUC program, the City will continue to participate in school -based education programs including classroom presentation, teacher workshops, and classroom educational materials. Public Outreach — As part of the regional EWUC program, the City will continue to participate in public outreach programs including water conservation brochures, summer lawn watering calendar, transit advertising, and other regional efforts. Indoor retrofit kits — As part of the regional EWUC program, the City will continue to offer indoor retrofit kits. This measure applies to the single-family and multi -family sectors, both existing and new customers. Different versions of the kit will be available to each sector. The single-family kits consist of a 2.0 gallons per minute (GPM) showerhead and a 1.0 GPM bathroom faucet aerators. Those flow rates are more efficient than the maximum allowed under the plumbing code. The multi -family kits include those measures plus 2.2 GPM kitchen faucet aerators, which are treated as bringing customers up to code, even though technically the maximum flow rate allowed under the plumbing code is slightly higher at 2.5 GPM. Kitchen faucet aerators are only included in the multi -family kits since the measure analysis concluded that the majority of the single-family sector has already been brought up to code due to natural replacement and distribution of the previous kits, which were targeted primarily to single-family customers. Outdoor irrigation kits — This measure is a modification of the outdoor retrofit kits, as already described, which the City has offered as part of the regional EWUC program. This measure applies to the single-family and multi -family sectors, both existing and new customers. These are free outdoor irrigation kits with devices and information to improve the irrigation efficiency of residential customers that manually irrigate their landscaping. Historically, the kits have included items such as a water timer and shut-off device, a spring - loaded hose nozzle, a rain gauge, hose washers, and a conservation brochure. While the exact contents of the new kits have not been determined, the contents will be slightly different than the previous outdoor kits. Toilet leak detection — As part of the regional EWUC program, the City will expand one component of the previous EWUC indoor kits. This measure provides free toilet leak detection dye strips for customers to determine if their toilets leak and provides detailed information on how to fix leaks. This measure applies to single-family and multi -family sectors, both existing and new customers, and businesses with tank -style toilets. Only tank - style toilets are targeted since most leaks occur in that type of toilet, usually vial flapper leaks. School irrigation system audits — This measure is a modification of the school irrigation audit and upgrade program already described, as art of the regional EWUC program. This 5 Packet Pg. 274 8.A.a measure provides free irrigation audits to schools to improve the efficiency of irrigation systems. Efficiencies can be achieved through hardware improvements or operational changes. The audits are performed by a professional landscape irrigation auditor. The measure is applied to existing customers in the non-residential sector. The financial assistance that had been provided to implement audit recommendations has been eliminated in order to reduce program costs. Commercial indoor audits — As part of the regional EWUC program, the City will begin offering indoor audits to non-residential customer. This is a modified version of a measure which Everett has been implementing in its retail service area. This measure provides free indoor audits to non-residential customers to determine efficiencies that could be achieved through hardware improvements or operational changes. The audits are performed by a professional auditor. The measure is applied to the non-residential sector, both existing and new customers. Conservation rate structures — Currently Edmond customers are billed based on a relatively small fixed charge, along with a uniform rate for actual consumption. As part of the next comprehensive plan update in 2016, the City will review conservation rate structure, including inclining block and seasonal rates. Reclaimed water opportunities — The next comprehensive plan update will also investigate the feasibility and opportunities to use reclaimed water. Water Supply Summary — The City of Edmonds water supply originates in the Cascade Mountains at Spada Lake, a man-made reservoir formed from damming the Sultan River in the 1960's. The reservoir receives rainfall and snowmelt which then is piped downstream to Chaplain Reservoir and further delivered via four large transmission lines to the City of Everett. From there some water is then delivered to large storage reservoirs, such as those operated by the Alderwood Water District. The District then conveys water to different service areas, among those the City of Edmonds. Spada Reservoir has a storage capacity of 50 billion gallons and is located in steep mountain terrain that receives an average of 165 inches of precipitation a year. This map represents the flow of the Everett water supply from Spada Reservoir to Everett proper via transmission lines. Water is then conveyed down the I-5 and State Highway 99 corridor with one final destination being the City of Edmonds shown along Puget Sound in the southwest corner. 0 Packet Pg. 275 8.A.a Epruck LyrrRvoo� � i 2,500,000 2,000,000 ----* ---- 1,500,000 1,000,000 500,000 Lain Sbwffm LA �lCM rNmtbm ��� �g 1. - - Ap ~Ir�ni�l AE _ .• r Wit � 5iian - rmnrve 2 , � -� Cad Ebr Pq H' � E S City of Edmonds Annual Water Consumption SEATTLE CCF ALDERWOOD CCF COMBINED CCF ♦ TREND LINE 00 00 00 0� 091' O`3 ODD Oh 00 0'1 Orb 0°, 0p 0^ & O`5 OR Oh O�° O1 00 0°' �O �^ �0 �O 1� 1 Nb NO ^^ NO NO NO ^0 NO NO NO NO NO NO NO ^0 L0 'O r1O lO P f 10 lO 'O r1O jO '0 lO 10 7 Packet Pg. 276 8.A.a C N t v APPENDIX G Packet Pg. 277 8.A.a E a� THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK L .N C d L L Q O U r O N O C O O C N N d L Q. Q Packet Pg. 278 8.A.a July 24, 2001 FOREWORD Pursuant to Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) 18.00.040, these City of Edmonds Construction Standard Details and Specifications, hereinafter referred to as "Edmonds Standard Details", shall apply whenever any public or private work is performed within the City of Edmonds, including work performed by private parties at their own expense. City capital improvement projects will be required to meet all the conditions within these standards unless the City Engineer approves an exception from the design standard in effect at the time of construction. Except where these Edmonds Standards Details provide otherwise, design, construction and materials shall conform to the appropriate standards of the most current edition of the following publications produced separately by Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) or jointly by WSDOT and Washington State Chapter of the American Public Works Association (APWA). • WSDOT/APWA Standard Specifications for Road, Bridge and Municipal Construction, hereinafter referred to as "WSDOT/APWA Standard Specifications". • WSDOT/APWA Standard Plans for Road, Bridge and Municipal Construction, hereinafter referred to as "WSDOT/APWA Standard Plans". The City Engineer is hereby delegated the authority to allow minor deviations to these standards after review of evidence submitted by the developer, establishing that such modifications are equal to or better than the requirements in these standards, that they are in the public interest, that they are based upon sound engineering practices and judgment, and that requirements for safety, function, appearance and maintainability are fully met. Such deviations from the standards must be submitted, reviewed and approved in writing by the City Engineer prior to construction. The City Engineer will make the decision as to whether a requested deviation or alternative will be allowed. Revisions to these Edmonds Standard Details may be issued periodically by the City Engineer as necessary to make corrections or clarifications or to conform to current municipal practices, state or federal standards and new technology. Such revisions will be formally issued by the City Engineer in writing, entered into the Standard Details and recorded in the Revision Log. NOEL MILLER, P.E. Public Works Director Packet Pg. 279 8.A.a EDMONDS STANDARD DETAILS Modifications to Standard Specifications Log Revision Title Date April 2012 Modifications to Division 2 of Technical Specifications (Earthwork) April 2012 Modifications to Divisions 5 through 7 April 2012 Modifications to Division 9 of Technical Specifications (Materials) January 2015 Material Modifications to Divisions 7, 8 and 9 Packet Pg. 280 8.A.a CITY OF EDMONDS MODIFICATIONS TO DIVISION 2 - EARTHWORK OF THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS: 2-09 STRUCTURE EXCAVATION 2-09.1 Description Delete this section and replace it with the following section 2-09.1: 2-09.1 Description This section covers the work necessary for trench excavation and backfill for all pipelines, complete. A. Trench Excavation Excavation is unclassified. Complete all excavation regardless of the type of materials encountered. The contractor shall do an estimate of the kind and extent of the various materials that will be encountered in the excavation. B. Type of Bedding Bedding consists of pipe base and pipe zone material. Pipe zone material shall be required for all pipe. Pipe base material will be required for pipes except ductile iron pipe. Pipe base material for ductile iron shall be required when, in the opinion of the Engineer, the native trench bottom is not suitable for laying pipe. C. Types of Backfill For bidding purpose, the class of backfill to be used above the pipe zone is indicated on the plans or class D if not shown. The City reserves the right to modify the use, location, and quantities of the various types of backfill during construction according to the established bid item prices. The Engineer will designate the type of backfill to be used in each location throughout the construction of the project. The general classifications of backfill are as listed below: 1. Class B Class B backfill will be used in unsurfaced areas where compaction and subsequent settlement are not critical. 2. Class C Class C backfill will be used in unsurfaced areas or road shoulders where reseeding, sod replacement, or shoulder replacement will be required. Compaction in these applications is important, as the subsequent settlement must be held to a minimum. 3. Class D Class D backfill will be used in unsurfaced and surfaced areas where compaction is critical to ensure that no settlement occurs. Pavement replacement and shoulder replacement will be made shortly after backfilling. D. Water for Trench Compaction The contractor shall make all arrangements for a source of water. All City water shall be metered and supervised by the City. The contractor shall be responsible for any deposit fees. 2-09.3 Construction Requirements Supplement this section with the following section 2-09.3(5): 2-09.3(5)A. Surface Preparation for Excavation Conform to subsection 2.01 Clearing, Grubbing and Roadside Cleanup 2-09.3(5)B. Trench Excavation and Shoring 1. Open Trench Limited The length of trench excavated in advance of the pipe laying operation shall be kept to a minimum, and in no case shall it exceed three hundred (300) feet, unless specifically authorized by the Engineer. Updated April 24, 2012 Division 2 - 1 Packet Pg. 281 8.A.a 2. Trench Width Contractor shall conform to state and federal laws. Minimum width of unsheeted trench in which pipe is to be laid shall be eighteen (18) inches greater than the outside diameter of the pipe, or as approved. Sheeting requirements on each side shall be independent of trench widths. The maximum permissible trench width from the bottom of the trench to the crown of the pipe shall be as follows: 15 inch diameter and smaller 40 inches 18 inch diameter and larger 1-1/2 times the inside diameter of the pipe plus 18 inches If the maximum trench width at the crown of the pipe is exceeded by the contractor without the written authorization of the Engineer, the contractor will be required, at his own expense, to provide pipe of higher strength classification or to provide a higher class of bedding, as approved by the Engineer. Maximum permissible trench widths shall be as shown on the plans. If the maximum permissible trench width is exceeded, contractor shall be solely responsible for all costs associated with the additional trench width including, but not limited to, backfill and surface restoration. 3. Trench Safety Systems Safety systems shall be provided in conformance to Washington Industrial Safety and Health Act, Chapter 49.17 RCW. 4. Grade Excavate the trench to the lines and grades shown or as established by the Engineer (Section 1-05.4) with proper allowance for pipe thickness and for pipe bedding (base) material as required. If the trench is excavated below the required grade, correct any part of the trench excavated below the grade with material of the type specified for pipe bedding at no additional cost to the City. 5. Bell (Joint) Holes At the location of each joint, the contractor shall dig bell (joint) holes of ample dimensions in the bottom of the trench and at the sides where necessary to permit the joint to be made properly and to permit easy visual inspection of the joint. 6. Disposal of Excess Excavated Material Contractor shall make arrangements for the disposal of all excess material and bear all costs. 7. Shoring, Sheeting, and Bracing of Trenches All sheeting, shoring, and bracing of trenches shall conform to the safety requirements of the federal, state, or local public agency having jurisdiction and as required to protect the pipe. The most stringent of these requirements shall apply. 8. Location of Excavated Materials During trench excavation, contractor shall place the excavated material only within the construction easement, right-of-way, or approved working area in such a manner that it will cause a minimum of inconvenience to the traveling public and provide for merging traffic where necessary. Contractor shall not obstruct both lanes of traffic on any private or public traveled roadways or streets. The contractor shall also take the necessary steps to control erosion of the excavated material. Updated April 24, 2012 Division 2 - 2 Packet Pg. 282 8.A.a 2-09.3(5)C. Dewatering The contractor shall furnish, install, operate, and maintain all necessary machinery, appliances, and equipment to keep excavations free from water during construction, and shall dewater and dispose of the water so as not to cause injury to public or private property or to cause a nuisance or a menace to the public. Disposal options for dewatering water, depending on site constraints, may include: • Infiltration in an area approved by the Engineer, • Transport offsite in a vehicle such as a vacuum flush truck, for legal disposal in a manner that does not pollute state waters, • Department of Ecology approved onsite chemical treatment or other suitable treatment technologies, • Sanitary sewer discharge with City sewer department approval • Use of sedimentation bag with outfall to a ditch or swale for small volumes of localized dewatering. 2-09.3(5)E. Trench Backfill 1. General When backfill is placed mechanically, push the backfill material onto the slope of the previously placed and allow the material to slide down into the trench. Do not push backfill into the trench in such a way as to permit free fall until two (2) feet of cover or more is provided over the top of the pipe. Under no circumstances, allow sharp or heavy pieces of material to drop directly onto the pipe or the tamped material around it. All backfill, regardless of class, shall be placed in successive layers not to exceed eight (8) inches in loose thickness and each layer shall be compacted to the density specified herein. At no time shall backfill material be placed in the trench if the moisture content exceeds two percent (2%) of optimum moisture for the approved backfill material. If the moisture content is less than two percent (2%) of the optimum, additional water may be required based on the recommendations of the City's soils testing consultant or approval from the City Engineer. Backfilled trenches shall be reasonably smooth, free from ruts and material neatly windowed over the trench and excess removed. If the trench is over driveways, roadways or paved shoulders, the surface shall be temporarily covered with two (2) inches of cold mix per the standard trench detail. Unpaved surfaces shall have material neatly mounded not more than six (6) inches above the existing ground for the entire width of the trench. Estimate and provide the amount of backfill material required so after normal settlement, the finished surface will meet the existing grade. Any excess or deficiency after normal settlement shall be corrected accordingly. Screen all boulders and stones from the backfill material that are two (2) inches in diameter or larger in the upper twelve (12) inches of the backfill. When, in the opinion of the Engineer, selected backfill material is unsatisfactory, the contractor shall furnish imported backfill material as approved by the Engineer. 2. Class B Backfill Backfill the trench above the pipe zone and compact to ninety percent (90%) of maximum density as determined by ASTM D1557 (see 1-06.2). Determine the type of compaction required to prevent subsequent settlement. 3. Class C Backfill Backfill the trench above the pipe zone and compact to ninety percent (90%) of the maximum density as determined by ASTM D1557 (see 1-06.2). Determine the type of compaction required to prevent subsequent settlement. Updated April 24, 2012 Division 2 - 3 Packet Pg. 283 8.A.a Class D Backfill Backfill the trench above the pipe zone with approved backfill material to a minimum of ninety-five percent (95%) as determined by ASTM D1557 (see 1-06.2),If the native material does not comply with the specifications, the contractor shall use imported material as approved by the Engineer. 5. Maintenance of Trench Backfill Any subsequent settlement of the finished surface during the warranty period shall be considered a result of improper or insufficient compaction and/or excessive moisture content and shall be promptly repaired by the contractor at no cost to the City. Maintain the backfilled trench surface until the following applicable operations have been completed and approved by the Engineer: a. Service connections, installed and backfilled. b. Valves, valve boxes, and hydrants installed. C. Pressure testing. d. Cleaning, flushing, and sterilization. e. Cleanup and restoration of all physical features. f. Utilities restored to their original condition or better. g. All work required between the two valves or manholes accomplished, with the exception of final surfacing. This maintenance shall include, but not limited to, keeping the surface of backfilled trenches reasonably smooth, free from ruts and potholes, and suitable for normal traffic flow, where applicable. No additional payment will be made for the maintenance of the trench Backfill before completion of the work outlined above, except for cold mix asphalt when directed or requested by the Engineer. No final pavement replacement shall be undertaken until all items outlined above have been completed and approved by the Engineer. Maintenance of backfilled trenches is considered to be incidental to this item of work, and payment for such maintenance will be considered as included in payment for class of Backfill. 2-09.3(5)F. Compaction of Backfill Mechanical compaction is generally recommended for trenches. Contractor will supply, operate and maintain the proper equipment to compact the classification of material relative to the field conditions. Water settlement may be used to compact sand, pit run, and gravel type backfills. If the contractor desires to use water settling, he shall submit in detail to the Engineer for approval, the procedure to be used. The contractor, as directed by the Engineer and at no additional cost, shall excavate test holes to review the effectiveness of compaction. If, in the opinion of the Engineer, the specified compaction and densities are not being achieved in accordance with 1-06.2, the contractor shall recompact the backfill material. If required, water saturated material shall be removed, dried, and placed back in lifts or replaced with imported backfill material. The contractor shall be responsible for all costs for labor, materials, and delays resulting from improper compaction and recompaction. 2-09.3(5)G. Embankments 1. Structural Embankment d Construct embankment to support the pipeline in accordance with the details shown on E t the plans. Spread excess excavated trench material in maximum one (1) foot lifts for the full width of the embankment cross section and compact to a minimum of ninety- V five percent (95%) of maximum density for the full depth of the fill as determined by Updated April 24, 2012 Division 2 - 4 Packet Pg. 284 8.A.a ASTM D1557 (see 1-06.2). Compact the embankment to its final cross section before the trench excavation for the pipe is made. 2. Additional Pipe Cover In locations where insufficient pipe cover exists, place selected native material over the pipe as shown or directed to provide a minimum cover of three (3) feet. Slope pipe cover to prevent blockage of surface runoff. No additional payment will be made for furnishing additional pipe cover. 2-09.3(5)H. Drainage Ditch Restoration Undercrossings of ditches shall be backfilled with imported granular backfill material or as approved to within the top one (1) foot of the ditch bottom. Place approved rock or rip -rap material in the top foot. Correct any ditch damage as a result of contractor's operations at no cost to the City. Payment for ditch restoration will be considered as incidental to the project. 2-09.3(5)I. Cold Mix Asphalt Cold mix asphalt used for temporary repair of utility trenches or other small areas shall be placed by hand, then raked to a smooth and uniformly dense layer before compacting. On large areas, which have been determined by the Engineer to be temporarily repaired with cold mix asphalt, the mix shall be spread with mechanical spreading equipment, such as a "Layton Paver," to a smooth and uniformly dense layer before compacting. In areas inaccessible to the mechanical spreading equipment, cold mix shall be placed by hand. 2-09.3(5)J. Resurfacing Resurfacing, including asphalt patching, graveling, and landscaping shall be performed after the maintenance of trench backfill. 2-09.3(5)K. Settlement Any settlement observed in the backfill, embankment, or in structures, including pipelines and manholes built over compacted material or embankment within the warranty period will be considered to be caused by improper compaction methods and/or pumping due to excessive moisture and shall be corrected and repaired at no cost to the City. Pipelines and structures which have settled shall be removed and reconstructed to the original condition at time of acceptance at no cost to the City. 2-13 IMPERMEABLE MEMBRANE Add the following section 2-13: 2-13.1 Description This section described furnishing and installing an impermeable membrane as part of the subsurface drain. 2-13.1(1) Definitions Installer: The party responsible for field handling, storing, deploying, and other site aspects of impermeable membrane installations. Also responsible for transportation of these materials to the site. Also called Contractor. PVC Geomembrane Manufacturer: The party responsible for the production of the PVC geomembrane rolls. 2-13.1(2) Field Quality Control The Contractor shall inspect each impermeable membrane in its entirety. Any area showing a defect shall be marked and repaired in accordance with these Specifications. During the construction phase, each impermeable membrane shall be continuously inspected for uniformity, damage, and imperfections (for example, holes, cracks, thin spots, or foreign materials). Immediately after installation, each impermeable membrane shall be inspected to Q Updated April 24, 2012 Division 2 - 5 Packet Pg. 285 8.A.a confirm the absence of tears, punctures, or blisters. Any imperfections shall be immediately repaired and re -inspected. 2-13.1(3) Transportation, Handling Storage, and Protection Use all means necessary to protect the material and Work of this Section before, during, and after installation. Impermeable membranes shall be marked and tagged with the following information: A. Manufacturer's name. B. Product identification. Promptly inspect shipments to assure that materials comply with requirements, quantities are correct, and materials are undamaged. Arrange storage of material to permit access for inspection. Periodically inspect to assure materials are undamaged and are maintained in acceptable conditions. Store impermeable membranes to protect from puncture, dirt, grease, water, moisture, mud, mechanical abrasions, excessive heat, or other damage. Store impermeable membrane on prepared flat surface (not on wooden pallets). Use appropriate handling equipment for deployment. Impermeable membrane damaged during handling shall be repaired to the satisfaction of the Engineer. Impermeable membrane irreparably damaged, as determined by Engineer, shall be immediately removed from the site and replaced. Repair, removal, and replacement shall be solely at Contractor's expense. 2-13.2 Materials The material supplied under these Specifications shall be first quality industrial grade products designed and manufactured specifically for the purposes of this work, and which have been satisfactorily demonstrated by prior use to be suitable and durable for use intended. The impermeable membrane material shall be PVC. The impermeable membrane shall conform to the properties detailed below: Test Test Designation Requirement 30 mil Thickness ASTM D 1593 28.5 mil Density ASTM D 792 1.20 Tensile Strength ASTM D 882 70 lbs/in. width Elongation ASTM D 882 300% Tear Resistance ASTM D 1004, Die C 8 lbs 1 All specification values are minimum roll values. The impermeable membranes shall be a homogeneous material uniform in color, thickness and surface texture, free of undispersed raw materials, streaks, foreign material, gels, and any signs of delamination, blisters, cracks, tears or pinholes. Impermeable membrane materials shall be chemically and temperature stable under the conditions in which they will be subjected, and shall contain no additives or filler which can leach out and cause deterioration over time. The sheeting shall be suitably formulated from a homopolymer vinyl chloride resin of Type GP in accordance with ASTM D 1755 to impart durability (ASTM D 3083). Use of water-soluble compounding ingredients is prohibited. Plasticizers that are resistant to migration, mildew, and bacterial degradation shall be used. The sheeting shall be pigmented to produce a uniform color and UV stabilized with carbon black. The sheeting shall be capable of being repaired with the use of solvent cement. Updated April 24, 2012 Division 2 - 6 Packet Pg. 286 8.A.a 2-13.2(1) Local Suppliers To assist the contractor, the names of the following local suppliers are provided: A. Northwest Lining and Geotextile Products, Inc., Kent, WA (253) 872-0244 B. Layfield Plastics. Bellevue, WA (800) 796-6868 Other local suppliers may also be available. 2-13.3 Construction Requirements 2-13.3(1) Inspection The Engineer will inspect the subgrade and give approval that it is suitable. 2-13.3(2) Installation 1. The impermeable membrane panels shall be installed to overlap by 1 foot as necessary. 2. During installation of the impermeable membrane, the following requirements shall be met: a. Install impermeable membrane using method that will not damage, stretch, or crimp impermeable membrane and protect underlying surface from damage. b. Personnel working on impermeable membranes shall not engage in activities that could damage the impermeable membrane. c. Unroll impermeable membrane using method that shall not damage, stretch, or crimp impermeable membrane and protect underlying surface from damage. 3. Membrane shall be laid underneath and on the north side of the subsurface drain trench, as shown on the contract drawings. 2-13.3(3) Visual Inspection During installation, visually examine all areas of overlap of the impermeable membrane for defects, holes, blister, undispersed raw materials, and any sign of contamination by foreign matter. Clean surface of the impermeable membrane prior to examination. Mark areas suspected of deficiencies. Repair each suspect location. 2-13.3(4) Repair Repair any portion of the impermeable membrane exhibiting a flaw or failing a visual inspection test in accordance with manufacturer's instructions. Patches shall be made from the same material as the impermeable membrane and shall extend a minimum of 4 inches beyond the defect. Repair, removal, and replacement shall be at Contractor's expense. 2-14 CONCRETE SEGMENTAL BLOCK WALL Add the following section 2-14: 2-14.1 Description This section describes a small retaining wall enclosure constructed of concrete segmental blocks to be installed to replace the existing retaining wall on -site. 2-14.1(1) Submittals A. Submit the following: 1. Product Data: Material description and installation instructions for each manufactured product specified 2. Samples a. Furnish one unit in the color and face pattern specified. 3. Test Reports: Independent laboratory reports stating moisture absorption and compressive strength properties of the concrete retaining wall units meet the Project Specifications when tested in accordance with ASTM C140, Sections 6, 8 and 9. 2-14.1(2) Deliver,. See and Handling E A. Deliver, store, and handle materials in accordance with manufacturer's recommendations, in such a manner as to prevent damage. Check the materials upon delivery to assure that proper material has been received. Store above ground on wood pallets or blocking. Remove damaged or Q otherwise unsuitable material, when so determined, from the site. Updated April 24, 2012 Division 2 - 7 Packet Pg. 287 8.A.a Exposed faces of concrete wall units shall be free of chips, cracks, stains, and other imperfections detracting from their appearance, when viewed from a distance of 10 feet. Prevent mud, wet cement, adhesives and similar materials which may harm appearance of units, from coming in contact with system components. 2-14.2 Materials A. Concrete Blocks 1. Meet requirements of ASTM C1372, except the maximum water absorption shall be limited to 7 percent, and unit height dimensions shall not vary more than plus or minus 1/16 inch from that specified in the ASTM reference, not including textured face. 2. Unit Face Area: Not less than 0.33 square feet. 3. Color: Selected by the Engineer from manufacturer's full range of standard colors. 4. Face Pattern Geometry: Straight or tri-plane 5. Texture: Split Rock Face. 6. Include an integral concrete shear connection flange/locator. B. Construction Adhesive: Exterior grade adhesive as recommended by the retaining wall unit manufacturer. 2-14.3 Construction Requirements 2-14.3 (1) Examination A. Examine the areas and conditions under which the retaining wall system is to be erected, and notify the Engineer in writing of conditions detrimental to the proper and timely completion of the work. Do not proceed with the work until unsatisfactory conditions have been corrected. B. Verify the location of existing structure, features and utilities prior to excavation. 2-14.3(2) Excavation A. Excavate to the lines and grades shown on the Drawings. Over -excavation not approved by the Engineer will not be paid for by the Owner. Replacement of these soils with compacted fill and/or wall system components will be required at the Contractor's expense. Use care in excavating to prevent disturbance of the base beyond the lines shown. 2-14.3(3) Foundation Preparation A. Excavate foundation soil as required for footing or base dimension shown on the Drawings, or as directed by the Engineer. B. The Engineer will determine if the foundation soils will require special treatment or correction to control total and differential settlement. C. Fill over -excavated areas with suitable compacted backfill, as recommended by the Engineer. 2-14.3(4) Base Course Preparation A. Place base materials to the depths and widths shown on the Drawings. 1. Extend the leveling pad laterally at least 6 inches in front and behind the lowermost concrete retaining wall blocks. 2. Provide aggregate base compacted to 6 inches thick (minimum). 3. The Contractor may at their option, provide a concrete leveling pad, in lieu of the aggregate base. B. Compact aggregate base material to provide a level, hard surface on which to place the first course of blocks. C. Prepare base materials to ensure complete contact with retaining wall blocks. Gaps are not allowed. Updated April 24, 2012 Division 2 - 8 Packet Pg. 288 8.A.a 2-14.3(5) Erection A. General: Erect units in accordance with manufacturer's instructions and recommendations, and as specified herein. B. Place first course of concrete wall units on the prepared base material. Check units for level and alignment. Maintain the same elevation at the top of each unit within each section of the base course. C. Ensure that foundation units are in full contact with the compacted base. D. Place concrete wall blocks side -by -side for full length of wall alignment. Alignment may be done by using a string line measured from the back of the block. Gaps are not allowed between the foundation concrete wall blocks. E. Check each course for level and alignment. Adjust units as necessary to maintain level and alignment prior to proceeding with each additional course. F. Install each succeeding course. Backfill as each course is completed. Pull the units forward until the locating surface of the unit contacts the locating surface of the units in the preceding course. G. Interlock wall segments that meet at corners by overlapping successive courses. Attach concrete retaining wall units at exterior corners with adhesive specified. 2-14.3(6) Backfill Placement A. Place fill and compact with only lightweight hand -operated compaction equipment. 2-14.3(7) Cap Unit Installation A. Apply adhesive to the top surface of the unit below and place the cap unit into desired position. B. Cut cap units as necessary to obtain the proper fit. 2-14.3(8) Tolerances A. Site Construction Tolerances 1. Vertical Alignment: Plus or minus 1-1/2 inches over any 10-foot distance, with a maximum differential of 3 inches over the length of the wall. 2. Horizontal Location Control from Grading Plan a. Straight Lines: Plus or minus 1-1/2 inches over any 10-foot distance. b. Corner and Radius Locations: Plus or minus 12 inches. 3. Immediate Post Construction Wall Batter: Within 2 degrees of the design batter of the concrete retaining wall units. 4. Bulging: Plus or minus 1-1/4 inches over any 10-foot distance. 2-14.3(9) Adjusting and Cleaning A. Replace damaged units with new units as the work progresses. B. Remove debris caused by wall construction and leave adjacent paved areas broom clean. Updated April 24, 2012 Division 2 - 9 Packet Pg. 289 8.A.a THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK. Q Packet Pg. 290 8.A.a CITY OF EDMONDS MODIFICATIONS TO DIVISION 5 - SURFACE TREATMENTS AND PAVEMENTS OF THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS 5-04 HOT MIX ASPHALT Supplement this section with the following: 5-04.3(4) Rollers Pneumatic tire rollers shall not be used unless specified in the Special Provisions. 5-04.3(17) Paving Under Traffic Open trenches within the traveled way or auxiliary lane shall have a steel -plate cover placed over them. A wedge of suitable materials, if required, shall be placed for a smooth transition between the pavement and the steel plate at the discretion of the Engineer. Warning signs shall be used to alert motorists of the presence of the steel plates. Updated April 24, 2012 Division 5 - 1 Packet Pg. 291 8.A.a THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK. Q Packet Pg. 292 8.A.a CITY OF EDMONDS MODIFICATIONS TO DIVISION 6 - STRUCTURES OF THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS 6-02 CONCRETE STRUCTURES Supplement this section with the following: 6-02.3(1) Classification of Structural Concrete Class 3000 concrete, minimum 5 1/2 sack (94 pound sacks) mix, shall be used for all concrete work, including sidewalks, curb and gutter, curbs, retaining walls, and small structures. 6-02.3(6)A Weather and Temperature Limits to Protect Concrete A clear, not white, curing compound shall be brushed or sprayed on all exposed concrete immediately after the finishing work. Other protective measures for weather constraints are still required, including protection from excessive hot and cold temperatures (including wind chill). 6-02.3(12) Construction Joints Construction or "dummy" joints shall consist of a tooled 1/4- inch joint into the concrete pour and shall be placed at 10-foot intervals. All work shall be perpendicular and straight. 6-02.3(13) Expansion/Contraction Joints The following requirements apply to all curb, curb and gutter, and sidewalk work. Full depth expansion joints, consisting of 1/2-inch thick premolded material (AASHO M213), shall be placed perpendicularly when abutting to existing improvements at each side of driveway cuts and at a maximum spacing of ten feet. Curb and gutter installations will require an additional 2-inch cut or the installation of a 1-inch by 4-inch wedge into the heel of the pour. All work shall be perpendicular and straight. 6-02.3(14) Finishing Concrete Surfaces The finished improvements shall be true to grade, straight with smooth transitions or curves. Grade checked with a ten -foot straight edge placed anywhere on the slab in any direction and shall not deviate more than 1/8 inch, and alignment shall not vary more than 1/4 inch. The finish shall be a light broom finish as approved by the Engineer in 1-05.6 Inspections. The City will not accept finishes that are non -uniform, overworked, discolored, spalling, damaged by weather, or where a cement layer has formed. Updated April 24, 2012 Division 6 - 1 Packet Pg. 293 8.A.a THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK. Q Packet Pg. 294 8.A.a CITY OF EDMONDS MODIFICATIONS TO DIVISION 7 — DRAINAGE STRUCTURES, STORM SEWERS, SANITARY SEWERS, WATER MAINS AND CONDUITS OF THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS 7-04 STORM SEWERS Supplement this section with the following: 7-04.2 Materials See approved material listings MM-1 through MM-4 as contained in City of Edmonds Material Modifications, Divisions 7, 8 and 9. 7-04.3(1) Cleaning and Testing All pipes shall be tested for exfiltration. 7-04.3(3) Add: Backfillin,g Storm Sewer Trenches Storm sewer pipes shall be bedded and backfilled as specified in Section 2-09. 7-05 MANHOLES, INLETS, CATCH BASINS AND DRYWELLS Supplement this section with the following: 7-05.3(5) Connection to Existing Line, Catch Basin, Curb Inlet or Manhole (New Section) Where shown on the plans, new stormwater pipes shall be connected to existing lines, catch basins, curb inlets and/or manholes. The Contractor shall not tap directly into stormwater main pipes but shall install a structure to make said connection. The Contractor shall be required to core drill into the structure, shape the new pipe to fit, and regrout the opening in a workmanlike manner. Where directed by the Engineer or where shown on the plans, additional structure channeling may be required. 7-08 GENERAL PIPE INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS Supplement this section with the following: 7-08.3(1)C Beddingthe he Pipe Pipe bedding for PVC pipe shall be placed to a depth of 6" below the bottom of the pipe and extending up 6" above the crown on all pipes. The hand -placed bedding around the pipe and to a point 6 inches above the crown shall be rammed and tamped by use of shovels or other approved hand held tools so as to provide firm and uniform support over the full length of all pipes. All other requirements for pipe bedding shall be per Section 9.03. Pipe bedding shall be considered incidental to the unit price for all pipe and no further compensation shall be made. 7-09 WATER MAINS Supplement this section with the following: 7-09.2 Materials See approved material listings MM-1 through MM-4 as contained in City of Edmonds Material Modifications, Division 7, 8 and 9. 7-09.3(11) Compaction of Backfill See 1-06.2(1) Samples and Tests. 7-12 VALVES FOR WATER MAINS Supplement this section with thefollowing: See approved materials list MM-1 through MM-4 7-14 HYDRANTS Supplement this section with the following: See approved materials list MM-1 through MM-4. 7-15 SERVICE CONNECTIONS Supplement this section with the following: Updated April 24, 2012 Division 7 - 1 Packet Pg. 295 8.A.a See approved materials list MM-1 through MM-4. 7-17 SANITARY SEWERS Supplement this section with the following: 7-17.2 Materials See approved materials list MM-1 through MM-4. 7-17.3(1) Protection of Existing Sewerage Facilities When extending an existing sewer, the downstream system shall be protected from construction debris by placing a screen or trap in the first existing manhole downstream of the connection. It shall be the Contractor's responsibility to maintain this screen or trap until the new system is placed in service and then to remove it. Any construction debris which enters the existing downstream system shall be removed by the Contractor at his expense, and to the satisfaction of the Engineer. When the first manhole is set, the outlet shall be plugged until acceptance by the Engineer. 7-17.3(2)A General See Section 1-05.4. 7-17.3(2)E Low Pressure Air Test for Sanitary Sewers Construct of Air Permeable Materials Section 7-17.3(2)E is supplemented by adding the following: When air permeable pipe is subjected to a low-pressure air test, all of the provisions of Section 7- 17.3(2) shall apply, except that the time in seconds for the pressure drop shall be equal to or greater than the required time as shown in the table below: Time in Seconds for Pressure Drop Pipe Length (ft) Pipe Dia. (in) 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 4 5 9 14 18 22 27 31 36 40 45 6 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 85 85 8 18 36 54 71 89 107 114 114 114 114 10 28 56 84 111 139 142 142 142 143 159 12 40 80 120 160 170 170 170 183 206 228 15 63 125 188 213 213 214 250 286 320 360 18 90 180 255 255 257 310 360 410 460 520 21 123 245 298 298 350 420 490 560 630 700 24 160 320 340 370 460 550 640 730 830 920 27 203 390 390 460 580 700 810 930 1040 1160 30 250 430 430 570 720 860 1000 1140 1290 1430 All time values listed in the table are in seconds. If a section to be tested includes more than one pipe size, the total time required can be found by adding the time values for each size of pipe and its corresponding length. Pipe over 30 inches in diameter shall be tested one joint at a time in accordance with ASTM C 1103 7-17.3(2)F Low Pressure Air Test for Sanitary Sewers Constructed of Non Air Permeable Materials Delete this section and replace it with the following: When non air permeable pipe is subjected to a low-pressure air test, all of the provisions of Section 7-17.3(2)E shall apply, except that the time in seconds for the pressure drop shall be equal to or greater than four times the time shown in the table listed in Section 7-17.3(2)E. Pipe over 30 inches in diameter shall be tested one joint at a time in accordance with ASTM C 1103 Reaches of thermoplastic pipe containing no joints shall be exempt from testing requirements. Updated April 24, 2012 Division 7 - 2 Packet Pg. 296 8.A.a 7-17.3(2)H Television Inspection Section 7-17.3(2)H is supplemented by adding the following: Before final acceptance, the Inspector shall require all sanitary sewer lines to be inspected by the use of a television camera, utilizing Contracting Agency's approved private inspection services. After completion of the following, authorization from the Contracting Agency shall be required before the Contractor can perform the initial television camera work: 1. The acceptable placement of applicable pipe, ballast, bedding, and backfill material. 2. The acceptable completion of all applicable channels and grout work. 3. The acceptable debris removal, cleaning, and flushing of all applicable pipes and structures. The television inspection requirements shall include the provisions of- 1 A color closed circuit television (CCTV) camera with a pan and tilt capacity in order to view all main lines, lateral lines, and structures including channels. CCTV equipment shall include television cameras, a television monitor, cables, power sources, and other equipment. Focal distance shall be adjustable through a range from 150 millimeters (6 inches) to infinity. The CCTV equipment shall include a distance measuring instrument (DMI) to measure the horizontal distance traveled by the camera. The DMI readout shall appear continuously on the videotape produced by the inspection and shall be accurate to less than 1 percent error over the length of the section of pipeline being inspected. For storm or sanitary sewers, the length is measured from the centerline of the manhole or catch basin to the centerline of the next manhole or catch basin. The CCTV inspection system shall be performed utilizing one of the following video camera systems: a. Remote -focus stationary lens cameras; b. Rotating lens cameras; or c. Pan -and -tilt cameras. 2. The camera and television monitor shall produce a minimum of 14 lines per millimeter (350 lines -per -inch) resolution. The video camera shall be mounted on a skid, floatable raft system, or transporter based on the conditions of the pipeline to be televised. Telephones, radios, or other suitable means of communication shall be utilized to ensure communication exists between members of the crew. A description of the system to be utilized shall be included with the submittal package 3. Lateral CCTV inspections shall be completed to the right -of way or as directed by the Engineer 4. A dye solution to be introduced in sufficient quantity to travel from the structure that is the highest point of inspection to the downstream terminus of the inspection limits. Red or purple dye shall be used for PVC pipe and green dye for ductile iron, HDPE and concrete pipe. 5. A one -inch reference ball to be mounted to the camera in order to drag along the bottom of the pipe during the entire inspection procedure. 6. Linear measure references to be measured from the center of the beginning structure to the center of the next inline structure and include the direction of flow. The locations of lateral pipes and all distinctive pipe conditions shall be referenced to the centerline of the beginning structure. All structure references shall utilize the designated structure reference numbers shown on the plans. The following television inspection information shall be provided to the Contracting Agency: 1. A clear DVD record of both video and audio in Windows Media Player format, which encompasses the limits of the inspection area and including all reference data as described herein. 2. A written report shall be provided corresponding to the inspection record and including all reference data as described herein. The report shall consist of a written narrative of all distinctive pipe conditions including ponding areas in excess of tt/4 inch. 7-17.3(2)I Sewer Line Connections U Unless otherwise approved by the Engineer, all connections of lateral sewers to new ductile iron pipe or existing mains shall be made through a cast iron saddle secured to the sewer main with stainless Q steel bands. The main shall be core drilled. Updated April 24, 2012 Division 7 - 3 Packet Pg. 297 8.A.a Connections to concrete manholes shall be core drilled, and shall have an "O" ring rubber gasket meeting ASTM C-478 in a manhole coupling equal to the Johns -Manville asbestos -cement collar, or use a conical type flexible seal equal to Kor-N-Seal. Updated April 24, 2012 Division 7 - 4 Packet Pg. 298 8.A.a CITY OF EDMONDS MODIFICATIONS TO DIVISION 9 - MATERIALS OF THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS: 9-03 AGGREGATES Supplement this section with the following: 9-03.16 Bedding Materials A. Rigid Pipe Bedding material for rigid pipe shall be free from wood waste, organic material and other extraneous or objectionable materials. Bedding material shall conform to the following gradations when tested in accordance with ASTM D422. Maximum particle size for ductile iron pipe shall be 1-1/2 inches. 1. Base Material Select: Selected excavated material for pipe base shall not contain particles larger than 5/8 inches Import: Imported base material shall be clean granular sand or sand and gravel mix conforming to the following gradation: Passing 3/4 inch square opening 100% Passing 3/8 inch square opening 95% - 100% Passing U.S. #8 sieve 0% - 10% Passing U.S. #200 sieve 0% - 3% Sand equivalent 35 min. 2. Pine Zone Pipe zone material shall be crushed, processed or naturally occurring granular material or pea gravel, conforming to the following gradation: Passing 3/4 inch square opening 100% Passing 3/8 inch square opening 95% - 100% Passing U.S. #8 sieve 0% - 10% Passing U.S. #200 sieve 0% - 3% Sand equivalent 35 min. B. Thermoplastic Pipe Bedding material for thermoplastic pipe shall be free from wood waste, organic material and other extraneous or objectionable materials. Bedding material shall conform to the following gradations when tested in accordance with ASTM D422. Pipe zone material shall be crushed, processed or naturally occurring granular material or pea gravel conforming to the following gradation: Passing 3/4 inch square opening 100% Passing 3/8 inch square opening 95% - 100% Passing U.S. #8 sieve 0% - 10% Passing U.S. #200 sieve 0% - 3% Sand equivalent 35 min. 9-03.19 Bank Run Gravel for Trench Backfill All backfill material shall be free from wood waste, organic material and other extraneous objectionable materials. Material shall be uniformly graded from coarse to fine and conform to the following gradation when tested in accordance with ASTM D422: 1. Select Maximum particle size for this material shall be 2'/2 inches. 2. Import Particle size for this material shall be 11/4 ' minus CSBC. Division 9 - 1 Updated April24, 2012 Packet Pg. 299 8.A.a THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK. Q Packet Pg. 300 8.A.a CITY OF EDMONDS MATERIAL MODIFICATIONS DIVISIONS 7,8 AND 9 CITY OF EDMONDS MODIFICATIONS TO MATERIALS IN DIVISIONS 7,8 AND 9 OF THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS: The following material specifications shall clarify, supplement and supersede where applicable the WSDOT Standard Specifications. MATERIALS A. City of Edmonds approved materials: * approved only when shown in the plan, proposal, or Special Provisions. 1. WATER SYSTEMS MATERIAL DESCRIPTION MANUFACTURER Pipe Class 52 ductile iron (AWWA C151) (or US Pipe, American, Pacific class as noted onplans) push on joint pipe States Pipe Fittings (MJ/Flanged) Cement lined ductile iron AWWA C 153 /C110 Nuts, bolts (MJ Fitting AWWA C111 Accessories Couplings Long Body Ductile Iron, MJ, AWWA C153 Restrained joints for pipe Locking Gasket US Pipe, American, Pacific (locking gasket) States Restrained joints for pipe Mega -Lug Series 1100HD EBAA mechanical AWWA CI I I Uni-Flan a Series 1490 Ford Restrained joints for MJ fittings Mega -Lug Series 1100 EBAA AWWA C111 One-Lok D Slide Sigma Uni-Flange Series 1400 Ford StarGrip series 3000 Star Pipe Romagrip Romac Joint lubricant ANSI/NSF Standard 61 Gate valves, resilient wedge AVK Series 45/65 American AVK Co. (12" & smaller, AWWA C 509 Kennedy KS-RW Kennedy Valve or AWWA C 515) Series 2500 AFC American Flow Control Clow 2639 Clow Mueller 2300 Mueller Co. Butterfly valves (AWWA C Groundhog Pratt 504) Series 4500 Kennedy Valve Lineseal III Mueller Co. Tapping sleeve 18-8 Type 304 stainless steel with CF8 cast stainless steel flanged end with ANSI 150 pound drilling and tapping valve Romac, JCM Valve boxes Seattle Style 940 Olympic Foundry Inc. Fire hydrants meeting AWWA AVK Series 2780 American AVK Co. C502 w 4" Storz Adapter Centurion, Super Mueller Co. Reliant 929 M&H Medallion Clow Pacer Waterous Combination air relief/vacuum Series 140c APCO relief valve (ARV) AWWA Model 202c Val-Matic C512 Model U1-20 Crispin Automatic Control Valve AWWA C530 Cla-Val Valve Insertion EZ2 System Advanced Valve Technologies Material Mod 7-9 - 20161213.doex MM-1 Revised January 2015 Packet Pg. 301 8.A.a Cross Connection Assemblies Cross Connection Assemblies Current Washington State approved listing Flex Couplings Ductile Iron Bolted Mueller, Romac, Ford, Smith Blair Water Services and Connections MATERIAL DESCRIPTION MANUFACTURER Copper pipe Soft, type K, ASTM B 88 Streamline, Cerro Service Saddle - 2" IP saddle 317 Series Smith Blair with stainless steel straps Model 202S Romac Model FS202 Ford DR2S Mueller Co. Service Saddle — 1" CC saddles Model 101 s Romac with stainless steel straps Model FS101 Ford (up to 12" main) 315 Series Smith Blair DR1S Muller Co. Ball Corp. stops 1" CCxCTS FB1000 Ford comp. AWWA C800 B-25008 Mueller Co. 4701-BQ A.Y. McDonald Ball Corp. stops 2" IP FB 500 Ford B-2969 Mueller Co. 3131 A.Y. McDonald Ball Curb stops 1" MIPxCTS B-84-444Q Ford B25122 Mueller Co. 6107Q A.Y. McDonald Fittings - copper 110 Compression Mueller ANSI AWWA C800 C series quik joint Ford 4758-Q A.Y. McDonald Meter Setters: • New 1" Ford VBH74-15W-11-44 Ford A.Y. McDonald 20-415-WCDD44 A.Y. McDonald • Replace Exist 1" Ford VB74-15W-11-44 Ford A.Y. McDonald 20-415-WXDD44 A.Y. McDonald Meter Setters: • New 2" Ford VBH87-12HB-1177 Ford • Replace Exist 2" Ford VBB87-12HB-1177 Ford 1" Meter boxes (Unpaved 1324x12 MSBCF with Ductile Iron Cover Carson Areas) with Cast Iron Reader Door 1" Meter boxes (Paved Areas & A6001946PCX12 Box with A6001969RCI Armorcast Driveways) Cover with Hinged Reader Lid 2" Meter boxes Box: A6001641PCX18 Armorcast Lid: A6001947TRCI-H7 2. SEWER SYSTEM (sewer pipe) MATERIAL DESCRIPTION MANUFACTURER Pie PVC, SDR 35, ASTM D3034 Fittings and sewer service Same material as pipe PVC sand collars Manholes Precast ASTM C478, 48" min. at bottom. top concentric to 24" opening Material Mod 7-9 - 20161213.doex MM-2 Revised January 2015 Packet Pg. 302 8.A.a Manhole steps Polypropylene, ASTM D-4101 material Lane, MA Industries over ASTM A-615, grade 60 steel reinforcing bar, step to comply with ASTM C-478 Frames and covers ASTM A48, class 35, cast iron, East Jordan Ironworks bituminous coated, Transition couplings Longitudinally bolted coupling with Romac, Dresser, Rockwell asketed joints 3. STORM DRAIN SYSTEM MATERIAL DESCRIPTION MANUFACTURER Pipe *Concrete, reinforced, ASTM C76 or AASHTO M 170 Concrete (non -reinforced) ASTM C14 or AASHTO M86, class 2 Aluminum CMP, AASHTO M196, 16 ga. or as shown on plans, gasketed and coupling banded *Aluminum smooth wall pipe, 16 ga. or as shown on Cascade Culvert, Kaiser plans, recorrugated ends with annular bands and Aluminum gaskets *PVC, SDR 35, ASTM D3034 Ductile iron, class 50 Perma-loc series 46 J.M. Manufacturing Co. HDPE; smooth interior pipe, watertight ADS AASHTO M252, M294 Type S Hancor ASTM D 2321 ASTM D 1248 Type III Category 4 Grade P33 Class C ASTM D 3350 2' Minimum cover under pavement areas Fitting Same as pipe material PVC sand collars Manholes Precast ASTM C478, 48" min. at bottom, flat slab top, 8" min. thickness, 24" opening, Manhole steps Polypropylene, ASTM D-4101 material over ASTM Lane, MA Industries A-615, grade 60 steel reinforcing bar, step to comply with ASTM C-478 Frames and covers ASTM A48, class 35, cast iron, East Jordan Ironworks bituminous coated, Transition couplings ly bolted coupling with gasketed joints Romac, Dresser, Rockwell B. SUBSTITUTIONS MATERIAL DESCRIPTION MANUFACTURER Provide submittals for substitute materials to the Engineer for approval in accordance with the Special Provisions and the Standard Specifications c M a E m W m ca a� .y c d z L CL E 0 Q 0 N 4- 0 c 0 M .r c d m L IL Q Material Mod 7-9 - 20161213.docx MM-3 Revised January 2015 Packet Pg. 303 8.A.a THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK. Q Packet Pg. 304 L0Z 10 u011e;uasaad : 1-%Z) nnaiAGN A0u86V L60Z ounr ueld w8lsft as;eM spu0uap3 :;uauay0e11V city of edmonds development information -- WATER SERVICE LINE SPECIFICATIONS I. DEFINITION: The Water service line is defined as that pipe installed from the water meter to the building. II. MATERIALS Per Section 604.0, Chapter 6 of the IAPMOIANSI UPC 1-2003 Uniform Plumbing Code and WAG amendment #, the following types of water service line materials are recognized and shall meet the ASTM requirements as outlined in Table 14-lof the above Code: 1. Copper piping no less than type "L". 2. Polyethylene piping with iron pipe O.D. size and ASTM-D2239-SIDR#7-PE3406 markings. 3. Plastic, PVC, CPVC, PEX 4. Galvanized malleable iron., galvanized wrought iron, galvanized steel 5. Asbestos cement, PE, PVC, PEX-AL-PEX or PEX--AL-PE water pipe manufactured to recognized standards for water supply outside the building supply distribution can also be used. 6. All materials used in the water supply system, except valves and similar devices, shall he of like material, except where otherwise approved by the City. 7. Per City policy, minimum pipe size from meter to house is I". M. MARKINGS Piping shall be marked on the material at intervals of not more than 5' for: poly, pvc, and pex, cpvc, plastic pipe, etc. with manufacturer's name, size and pressure rating. The pressure rating shall be a minimum of 160 P.S.I. In 0 M d Y V M 1-0Z to uoi;e;uasaad L9LZ) MainaN Aoua6d LLOZ aunt ueld w81sAS aa;eM spuouap3 :4u0wL4oeUV �a (.0 Q M a. m M IL IV INSTALLATION 1. The water service pipe line shall be bedded on a firm, undisturbed base that is smoothly graded and free of large materials. If materials for backfill are larger than %2" diameter rock, a proper sandy soil shall be on site to backfill to 2 inches above the water pipe at time of inspection. If soil is disturbed, it shall be compacted to provide a stable base. 2. The pipe depth shall be a minimum of 18 inches from finished grade to top of service pipe and an 18 inch depth at the meter box. 3. When polyethylene pipe or other non traceable pipe is used, it must be buried with 12-gauge solid core tracer wire with vinyl coating. The run must be continuous, grounded at the meter and house and taped every 10 feet to the water pipe. 4. Polyethylene Pipe connections at the meter must be made with brass compression fittings. In addition, brass fittings shall be used to connect sections of pipe together. All connections shall be double -clamped with stainless steel clamps and shall be secured in opposite directions 5. Proper pipe connection fittings to the water meter, for all other material shall be approved by the City prior to connection 5. Piping shall be flushed out and under pressure with no leaks at the time of inspection. 6. The water service line shall not be buried with the sanitary sewer or drainage pipe. a) Minimum horizontal separation between sewer and water shall be 10 feet. b) Minimum vertical separation between sewer and water shall be 18 inches. When the minimum 10 foot separation is not possible, due to lack of space, the waterline shall be placed on a solid shelf excavated at one side of the common trench line 19" above the top of the sewerline and at least 19" from edge of waterline to edge of sewer line (see figure 1 below). If the waterline must cross the sewer, it must be at least 18" above the top of the sewer pipe at all points. V. INSPECTIONS Water service line and all connections shall be inspected prior the backfill and the preceding criteria must be met, or inspection will not be performed. Call the Engineering Inspection line at 425-771-0220, Ext. 1326, 24 hours in advance to schedule the required inspection. You may state your preference for morning or afternoon. Approved permit and/or job card must be on site at time of inspection. 2 LUOZ to uoileluasaad : L9LZ) MaiAON A3u86d LLOZ aunt ueld w8lsft a81eM spuouap3 4uauay3el1v ti 0 M WATER SERVICE WITH LESS THAN 10 FOOT SEPARATION Horizontal Separation Notes (For Parallel Construction) The parallel separation detail on figure 1 refers to side sewers only. Side sewers (gravity or pressure) shall be installed lower than the water service with a minimum vertical clearance of 18" from the bottom of the water service line to the top of the side sewer line. Vertical Separation Notes_ (For Perpendicular Construction) Side sewer lines that must cross water service lines shall be laid below the water lines to provide a separation of at least 18" between the invert of the water pipe and the crown of the sewer, whenever possible. When local conditions prevent this vertical separation, the following construction shall be used: A. Side sewers, passing over or under water lines, shall be: 1. Constructed of water main standard pipe material as shown in the Table. One segment of the maximum standard length of pipe, (but no less than 18' long) shall be used with the pipes centered to maximize joint separation. OR 18" MIN T M a m 4 b a. FIGURE 1 WATER SERVICE PARALLEL TO GRAVITY SEWER WITH LESS THAN 10 FOOT SEPARATION WATER MAIN STANDARD PIPE MATERIAL FOR SEWER LINES TYPE OF PIPE AWWA ASTM STANDARD PIPE JOINT FITTINGS Ductile Iron C 151 & C 104 C l l l C 110 Polyvinyl -Chloride C 900 (D3139 & C 110 F 477) Concrete Cylinder C 303 2. Standard gravity sewer material B. Water lines passing under gravity sewer, in addition, shall be encased in 1 sack mix control density protected by providing: fill (CDF) or in a %" thick continuous steel casing with all voids 1. A vertical separation of at least 18 inches between the pressure -grouted with sand -cement invert of the sewer and the crown of the water line. grout. The length of sewer pipe shall 2• Adequate structural support for the sewers to prevent be centered at the point of crossing so excessive deflection of joints and settling on and the joints will be equidistant and as breaking of the water line. far as possible from the water line. C. Pressure sewers shall only be constructed under water lines The sewer pipe shall be the longest with ductile iron pipe or standard sewer pipe in a steel casing standard length available from the for a distance of at least ten feet on each side of the crossing. manufacturer. 3 I 8.A.a I MOUNT HYDRANT PLUMB PROVIDE 3' MINIMUM CLEARANCE AROUND HYDRANT 1 /2" EXPANSION JOINT MATERIAL 4" MIN-6" MAX 3' x 3' x 3.5" THICK CONCRETE PAD AROUND HYDRANT ° 1 CY 1-1/2" WASHED ROCK. 1' MIN ABOVE DRAIN HOLES AND AROUND HYDRANT TO BOTTOM OF DITCH LINE. COVER TOP AND SIDES WITH MIRAFI 160N OR APPROVED EQUAL. UNDISTURBED EARTH 12"x12"x4" CONC. BLK. HYDRANT CONNECTION PIPE TO BE DUCTILE IRON CLASS 52. ANY INTERMEDIATE JOINTS TO BE RESTRAINED NOTES: 4" STORZ ADAPTER 18" MIN-24" MAX ABOVE FINISHED GRADE FINISH GRADE " FL x MJ 6" R.W. GATE VALVE RESTRAINED JOINTS MEGA —LUG OR EQUAL FROM HYDRANT TO VALVE (TYP) 12"x12"x4" CONC BLK DOUBLE SIDED BLUE RAISED PAVEMENT MARKERS ALIGN VALVE BOX EA PARALLEL WITH THE WATER LINE IT SERVE ROAD � CAST IRON ADJUSTABLE VALVE BOX TEE WITH FLANGED FLANGED CONNECTION CONNECTION FOR HYDRANT VALVE 0 THRUST BLOCK �— 10 MIL PLASTIC o BETWEEN BLOCK r & TEE 2" MIN CLEARANC ayi a BETWEEN a a BLOCKING AND BOLTS N 8 .. THRU! " a: • a d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s t 1 g 9" I APPROVED BY: R. ENGLISH I Packet Pg. 308 I 8.A.a I C I NOTES: • © 0 © I��I u� 0 ;■;rii!.!iiII�■- . ©.. © LOCATION 8 ii!.!ii��l i■�III o ® DRAINFLOOR12 m m ,. 1. VAULT SHALL BE UTILITY VAULT 612—LA WITH TOP SECTION MODIFIED TO ALLOW INSTALLATION OF LW HATCH TYPE "HTD-3" 3 LEAF, PART A (48"X108") 2. VALVE INCLUDES: • ISOLATION COCKS • OPEN/CLOSE SPEED CONTROLS • "H" STRAINER • RESTRICTION FITTING • CRD PILOT • EPDXY COATING 2. INSIDE VAULT HEIGHT: 6.5' MIN 3. ACCESS LID BY LW. GUTTER DRAIN SHALL BE CONNECTED TO STRUCTURE SUMP. 4. VAULT HATCH OPENING LOCATION SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH ENGINEER PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION TO ENSURE THAT ANY SITE SPECIFIC ACCESS ISSUES ARE ADDRESSED 5. ALL 3" STEEL PIPE FOR THE PRESSURE RELIEF DISCHARGE LINE SHALL BE SCHEDULE 40, SANDBLASTED, EPDXY LINED AND COATED LANE INTERNATIONAC_ POLYPROPYLENE LADDER WITH PULL UP HANDRAIL. CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL PER MANUFACTURER RECOMMENDATIONS AND COORDINATE LOCATION WITH ENGINEER. 16 -ACCESS LID OPENING (HINC SIDE) LW HATCH TYPE "HTD-3" 3 LEAF, PART A (48"X108") (H-20 RATING). 1O 2" BRASS BALL VALVE O2 2" THREADED BRASS PIPE O3 2" BRASS 90' BEND 03 PIECE UNION 55 2" THREADED CLA—VAL 9OG-01 BCSYKC W/VALVE POSITION INDICATOR O6 6" DI SPOOL WITH FL X PE LENGTH TO FIT. (5' LENGTH MAXIMUM.) O7 6" DI FL TEE WITH 2" TAPPED BLIND FLANGE SEE COE STD DETAIL 7.2.1 FOR APPURTENANCES SHOWN IN SECTION VIEW O8 6" FL STRAINER CLA—VAL MODEL X43H O6" CLA—VAL 9OG-01 BCSYKC W/VALVE POSITION INDICATOR (SEE NOTE #2) EPDXY LINING 10 6" FLANGE COUPLING ADAPTER 11 6" DI FL SPOOL. LENGTH TO FIT 12 6" FL RSGV WITH HAND WHEEL 13 6"x3" DI FL TEE SEE COE DETAIL 7.2.1 FOR APPURTENANCES SHOWN IN SECTION VIEW 14 3" FL RSGV WITH HAND WHEEL 15 3"x3"x2" REDUCING RUN TEE WITH 3" CLA—VAL 650A-01 & SIGHT GLASS SEE COE STD DETAIL 7.2.1 FOR APPURTENANCES SHOWN IN SECTION VIEW 16 3" STEEL DISCHARGE PIPE & 90' BEND, FIELD LOCATE PER ENGINEER 17 MEGA —LUG MID SPAN RESTRAINT AND THRUST BLOCK AND VAULT SEAL SEE COE STD DETAIL E7.2.2 18 MIPxFIP 1-1/4" BALL VALVE ® BOTTOM OF STRAINER CITY OF EDMONDS 6" PRV (PLAN VIEW) PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT REVISION DATE OCTOBER 2015 STANDARD D ETAI L s t 1 g 9" I APPROVED BY: R. ENGLISH I Packet Pg. 309 I 8.A.a l DRAIN TO SUMP OR CATCH BASIN FINISHED GRADE �St. 189v M VAULT OPENING AND LID FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION SEE COE STD DTL E7.2 iv PAINT PIPE ABOVE GROUND YELLOW 1" COMBINATION A.R.V. CRISPIN UL10 OR EQUAL 1" BRASS TEE W/1 "X1 /4" BUSHING- 1 " IP BALL CORP PRESSURE 1" BRASS TEE GAUGE 3/4" HOSE BIB 1/4" BALL VALVE SIGHT GLASS 1/4" BALL VALVE n 1/4" TEE 1" BALL CORP— Z' 6I rill -IC ' liii_ II d SIGHT GLASS 15 BEEHIVE STRAINER 3" OPE i PATTER u RETURN , BEND ALL BRASS PIPE L 1 O TEE -j `�nJ 6" MIN 0 ADJUSTABLE SEE COE STD SUPPORTS TWO ON DTL E7.2.2 SUMP DRAIN EACH SIDE OF PRV : o a ° r C cl �Kl\\\ 2" PVC DRAIN 5/8" MINUS C.S.T.C. COMPACTED %\\1-1 2" MINUS WASHED TO 95% MAX. DENSITY 2'��/�� GRAVEL BACKFILL FOR UNDISTURBED EARTH 2' DRYWELLS PER WSDOT 9-03.12(5) NOTES: SEE STANDARD DETAIL E7.2 FOR NOTE CALL OUTS. REVISION DATE CITY OF EDMONDS OCTOBER 2015 6" PRV (SECTION VIEW) PUBLIC WORKS STANDARD DEPARTMENT DETAIL APPROVED BY: R. ENGLISH Packet Pg. 310 I 8.A.a I 6" MINA PROFILE VIEW CALPICO VAULT SEAL. SEE TABLE BELOW FOR PIPE DIAMETER, CORING DIAMETER AND # OF VAULT SEAL LINKS. BOLTS MUST BE TIGHTENED FROM THE INSIDE OF THE VAULT TO ALLOW FOR MAINTENANCE OF LINK SEAL. A IRON #1100 SDB MEGALUG -SPAN RESTRAINT; POLYWRAP DR TO PLACEMENT OF CONCREI T IN PLACE 3,000 PSI CONCRE UST BLOCK (2'Wx2'Hx0.5' MIN) _..JSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE PER WSDOT STD. SPEC. 9-03.9(3) COMPACT TO 95% MAX DENSITY PER ASTM -1557 PIPE DIAMETER A CORE DRILL DIAMETER B CALPICO CSL# QTY OF CALPICO CSL 3" 6" 32 5 4" 8" 40 5 6" loll 40 7 8" 12" 40 9 CITY OF EDMONDS PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT PLAN VIEW VAULT THRUST BLOCK & VAULT SEAL REVISION DATE OCTOBER 2015 STANDARD D ETAI L s t l g 9" I APPROVED BY: R. ENGLISH I parkn4 Prr .311 I 8.A.a I 1 — 2" BRASS 90' BEND 1 — 2" BRASS 90' ST ELL 4"x4" CONCRETE MARKER POST PAINTED YELLOW WITH BLACK STENCILED DISTANCE AND DIRECTION TO VALVE 3/8" STEEL DIAMOND PLATE COVER FOG—TITE METER SEAL CO. NO. 2 FINAL GRADE 2" BRASS UNION TWO 17"x28" CONCRETE METER 2"X4" BRASS BOXES STACKED ON EACH OTHER NIPPLE 2" BRASS 90' 2" FIPxFIP RSGV ST. ELL 2" TYPE W COPPER PIPE PROVIDE CONTINUOUS UPWARD SLOPE FROM MAIN TO AIR —VAC �r BBRASSRASS 990'S 2"ELLLL WATER MAIN 2" MIPxCTS GRIP 2" MIP BALL CORP FORD FB 500-7 OR '_ 'a APPROVED EQUAL 2" IP TAP DOUBLE STRAP SERVICE SADDLE ROMAC 202S OR APPROVED EQUAL CITY OF EDMONDS PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 2" BRASS W BEEHIVE T o STRAINER E � PAINT PIPE R N ABOVE GROUND YELLOW WI f. d 2" BRASS PIPE (FIELD LOCTE) NEXT TOIST PROPERTYELINE .2" BRASS 90' ELL 2" BRASS 90' ST ELL 2" COMBINATION AIR/VAC VALVE CRISPIN UL20 OR APPROVED EQUAL WASHED GRAVEL PASSING 1-1/2" AND RETAINED ON Y4" MESH 2" BRASS 90' ST. ELL 2"x6" BRASS NIPPLE 4"x4"x8" CONCRETE BRICKS TO BEARING SOIL ARV ASSEMBLY REVISION DATE OCTOBER 2015 STANDARD D ETAI L s t 1 g 9" I APPROVED BY: R. ENGLISH I - parkn4 19 I 8.A.a I 2" IP TAP DOUBLE STRAP SERVICE SADDLE EQUAL TO ROMAC 202S FINAL GRADE 4 a 940 STYLE VALVE BOX ASSY. OR EQUAL WATER MAIN 2 x 3" THREADED BRASS NIPPLE 2" RESILIENT SEAT GATE VALVE FIPT 1730x12 ARMORCAST A6001640PCx12 WITH A6001947T ONE PIECE COVER 2" PVC THREADED PLUG z 2" BRASS 45' BEND ammml CAST IRON VALVE BOX ASSEMBLY 2" THREADED BRASS PIPE (CUT TO LENGTH) 1 — 2" BRASS ST. ELL 1 — 2" BRASS 90' ELL d b ° 2 x 3" THREADED BRASS NIPPLE 4"x4"x8" CONC. BRICK (TO BEARING SOIL) ab NOTE: PLACE BLOW —OFF ASSY. WITHIN 3' OF END OF MAIN CITY OF EDMONDS PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT BLOW -OFF ASSEMBLY S f 1 g 9" 1 APPROVED BY: R. ENGLISH s REVISION DATE OCTOBER 2015 STANDARD a D ETAI L Packet r_ . 313 I 8.A.a I NOTE: BACK SIDE OF METER BOX SHALL BE SET AT THE PROPERTY LINE. METER BOXES SHALL NOT BE PLACED IN DRIVEWAY AREAS. I r J WATER MATERIAL LIST: R.O.W. FINISHED GRADE - -�METER SUPPLIED BY CITY O BALL VALVE----- �I I G DIRECTION OF FLOW A � J PROPERTY LINE O OA ALL 1" SERVICES TO BE TYPE "K" SOFT COPPER TUBING OB 1 " BALL CORP. STOP WITH CC THREAD INLET AND COPPER (CTS) GRIP OUTLET (FORD OR MUELLER) OC DUAL PURPOSE UNION OD MIPT X CTS GRIP BALL VALVE CURB STOP EQUAL TO FORD B84-444Q FOR 1 " OWHEN REPLACING EXISTING SERVICES: 1 " METER SETTER WITH ANGLE BALL METER VALVE 15" HIGH WITH DUAL E PURPOSE UNIONS ON INLET AND OUTLET, HORIZONTAL IN HORIZONTAL OUTLET, EQUAL TO FORD VB74-15W-11-44 WHEN PLACING NEW PLACING NEW SERVICES: USE SAME AS ABOVE AND ADD A SINGLE CHECK, EQUAL TO FORD VBH74-15W-11-4 O 1" CC TAP SERVICE SADDLE EQUAL TO ROMAC 101S O CARSON 1324 MSBCF WITH DUCTILE IRON COVER AND CAST IRON READER DOOR O FOR VACANT LOT (FUTURE USE) LOCATION MARKED WITH PAINTED 2" X 4" STAKE WITH "WATER" STENCILED ON IT OI 14 GA. VINYL COATED WIRE TRACER (TAPED TO PLASTIC PIPE EVERY 10') TO BE GROUNDED AT METER AND HOUSE OJ SCHEDULE 40 3/4" OR 1' PLUG, REMOVE WHEN CONNECTION IS MADE TO CUSTOMER LINE KO WATER SERVICE TO HOUSE, INSTALLED BY OWNER/CONTRACTOR OPROPERTY OWNER RESPONSIBLE FOR PURCHASING 3/4" OR 1" METER THROUGH THE CITY CITY WILL SUPPLY METER AFTER PURCHASE IF USING 3/4" METER, CONTRACTOR WILL PROVIDE REDUCERS OBACK SIDE OF METER BOX SHALL BE SET AT THE PROPERTY LINE UNLESS APPROVED BY THE CITY ENGINEER. METER BOXES SHALL NOT BE SET IN DRIVEWAY AREAS UNLESS TRAFFIC RATED BOX IS APPROVED BY CITY ENGINEER. CITY OF EDMONDS PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT "St. 18yv 1" WATER SERVICE FOR 3/4" OR 1 " METER INSTALLATION APPROVED BY: R. ENGLISH REVISION DATE OCTOBER 2015 STANDARD DETAIL Packet Pg. 314 I 8.A.a I GROUND/ROADWAY/FINISH GRADE PROPERTY O GROUND/ROADWAY LINE i� II � II Oil 0 I II II II II II N ILI ' TO MAIN SHALL BE ANGLED AND NOT EXCEED 22 DEGREES MATERIAL LIST: OA 2" (IP TAP) DOUBLE STRAP SADDLE EQUAL TO ROMAC STYLE 202'S OB 2" BRASS IP BALL CORP OC 2 — 2" BRASS STREET ELLS FOR SWING JOINT OD COPPER TYPE K SOFT PIPE (2") OE 2" MIPT X CTS GRIP FITTING OF 2" FIPT X CTS GRIP FITTING OG BACK SIDE OF METER BOX SHALL BE SET AT THE PROPERTY LINE UNLESS APPROVED BY THE CITY ENGINEER. METER BOXES SHALL NOT BE SET IN DRIVEWAY AREAS UNLESS TRAFFIC RATED BOX IS APPROVED BY CITY ENGINEER. ()2" BRASS ST ELL OI METER SPACER TO BE SUPPLIED AND INSTALLED BY THE CONTRACTOR. SPACER MUST HAVE A MINIMUM OF 8 — 1 /4" HOLES DRILLED IN SPACER BODY. NOTE: PROPERTY OWNER RESPONSIBLE FOR PURCHASING 1-1/2" OR 2" METER THROUGH THE CITY. THE CITY WILL SUPPLY METER AFTER PURCHASE FOR CONTRACTOR INSTALL. IF 1-1/2" METER IS USED CONTRACTOR WILL SUPPLY REDUCERS TO CONNECT METER. CITY OF EDMONDS PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT OJ WHEN REPLACING EXISTING SERVICES: EQUAL TO FORD VBB87-12HB-1177 WHEN PLACING NEW SERVICES (HIGH BYPASS): EQUAL TO FORD VBH87-12HB-1177 OK METER BOX ARMORCAST A6001640PCX18, WITH ARMORCAST LID A6001947TRC1—H7 OR APPROVED EQUAL STRAIGHT WALL POLYMER BOX (NO MOUSEHOLES) WITH 20K COVER WITH HINGED Cl READER OL 2" TYPE "K" HARD COPPER OM SCHEDULE 40 2" PVC CAP OR PLUG REMOVED WHEN CONNECTION MADE TO CUSTOMER ON 4"x4"x8" CONCRETE BLOCK SUPPORTS OO 2" RESILIENT WEDGE GATE VALVE (FIP x FIP) WITH 2" AWWA OPERATING NUT OP 2 PIECE VALVE BOX — TOP SECTION TO BE RICH 940 STYLE 18" WITH REGULAR BASE SECTION LENGTH TO FIT OQ WATER SERVICE TO BUILDING INSTALLED AND CONNECTED TO SERVICE BY OWNER/CONTRACTOR 2" WATER SERVICE FOR 1-1/2 55 OR 2" METER INSTALLATION REVISION DATE OCTOBER 2015 STANDARD D ETAI L s t 1 g 9" I APPROVED BY: R. ENGLISH I Packet Pg. 315 I 8.A.a I MATERIAL LIST (ALL SIZES ARE SAME AS METER UNLESS OTHERWISE LISTED) O1 1-MECHANICAL LONG BODY CPLG O2-4"x3" REDUCER, MJ & 3' SPOOL FOR 3" SERVICE ONLY O3 1-TEE, MJxFL O4 1-GATE VALVE, FLxMJ (W/VALVE BOX & COVER) O5 3-DI PIPE, PE, LENGTH TO FIT O6 2-90' BEND, MJ O7 2-DI PIPE, PExFL LENGTH TO FIT O 1-EPDXY COATED SERVICE SADDLE, FORD FS202 (TAP POINTED UP AT 12-O'CLOCK) OR EQUAL, 1-CORP STOP, MIPT, FORD FLOW O FB500-7 OR APPROVED EQUAL, WITH 2" FIPTx2" MNST ADAPTER AND CAP (2-1/2" FNST) O9 2-GATE VALVES, FL WITH HAND WHEEL 10 SENSUS OMNI C2 METER W/INTERNAL STRAINER, W/ELECTRONIC RESOLUTION (100'S OF CUBIC FEET FOR 3" METER, 500 CUBIC FEET FOR 4-6" METER) 1 1 1-DI ADAPTER FL.xPE, LENGTH TO FIT 12 2-FLANGED COUPLING ADAPTER, EQUAL TO ROMAC FCG 13 MEGA -LUG MID -SPAN RESTRAINT AND THRUST BLOCK & VAULT SEAL. SEE COE STD DETAIL E7.2.2 O 14 PRECAST CONCRETE VAULT BY UTILITY VAULT CO (SEE TABLE FOR MODEL #) W/TWO DIAMOND PLATE DOORS RATED FOR HS-30 LOADING 15 1-FORD MIPT BALL CORP WITH THREADED END CAP SIZED TO FIT OMNI C2 TESTPORT C SEE TABLE" 16 1-OS & Y GATE VALVE, FL WITH HAND WHEEL TR/PL SENSOR (TO MOUNT IN VAULT 17 ACCESS DOOR) C 18 2-ADJUSTABLE STANCHION BOLTED TO FLOOR 19 LANE INTERNATIONAL POLYPROPYLENE LADDER WITH PULL UP HANDRAIL. CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL PER MANUFACTURER RECOMMENDATIONS AND COORDINATE LOCATION WITH ENGINEER. 20 1-TEE, FL CITY OF EDMONDS PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT a PAVED AREAS GRADE TO DRAIN 3" FROM TOP OF VAULT TO FINISHED GRADE IN PLANTER OR UNPAVED AREAS LW HATCH WITH GAS TIGHT SEAL (SEE NOTE 5 ON E7.6.213) C DRAIN (6" MIN DIA) WITH WIRE MESH RODENT SCREEN, SLOPE TO DAYLIGHT OR STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM ELEVATION VIEW 8" (SEE NOTE 5 ON E7.6.213) / - 1 SEE NOTE 7 2" ON E7.6.2B HATCH CLEAR OPENING Z 03" = J Qw =z 2' MIN F-2' MIN w PLAN VIEW 3", 499 9 6" WATER SERVICE & METER n PRIVATE PLUMBING J REVISION DATE OCTOBER 2015 STANDARD D ETAI L 3 c� s t 1 g 9" I APPROVED BY: R. ENGLISH I Packet — I Pr316 I 8.A.a I NOTES: 1. ALL MATERIALS, INCLUDING METER SHALL BE FURNISHED BY THE CONTRACTOR. 2. ALL PIPE & FITTINGS 3" & LARGER SHALL BE CEMENT LINED D.I.P. CL 52. 3. TEE WITH (3) GATE VALVES IS REQUIRED AT DISTRIBUTION MAIN. 4. VAULTS SHALL NOT BE INSTALLED IN AREAS SUBJECT TO VEHICULAR TRAFFIC. 5. VAULT COVER SHALL INCLUDE TWO LOCKING ALUMINUM LW TYPE HATCH DOORS (PART NO. HHD-1 D (36"x72") DOORS SHALL HAVE SLIP RESISTANT TREATMENT. DOORS SHALL BE CAST IN COVER WITH 8" SPECIAL OFFSET FROM VAULT WALL, AS SHOWN. COVER TO READ "WATER". 6. PROVIDE 24" CLEARANCE BETWEEN VAULT FLOOR & BOTTOM OF COMPOUND METER. WHERE ELEVATION OF VAULT FLOOR IS TOO LOW TO DRAIN TO DAYLIGHT OR TO STORM SYSTEM, THIS CLEARANCE CAN BE REDUCED TO A MINIMUM OF 12". SUBSTITUTION OF A SHORTER VAULT TO ALLOW FLOOR TO DRAIN BY GRAVITY SHALL BE SUBJECT TO APPROVAL OF THE CITY ENGINEER. SUBSTITUTE VAULTS ARE AS FOLLOWS: 3" 575—LA WITH 57TL-2-332P COVER (WITH SPECIAL OFFSET+LW ALUMINUM HATCH). 4" 675—WA WITH 675—TW-2-332P COVER (WITH SPECIAL OFFSET+LW ALUMINUM HATCH). 7. PROVIDE 2-1/4" DIAMETER OPENING IN ALUMINUM DOOR FOR TR/PL SENSOR. 8. ALL FITTINGS OUTSIDE VAULT SHALL INCLUDE THRUST BLOCKING AND JOINT RESTRAINT DEVICES (MEGALUGS OR APPROVED EQUAL). 9. PIPE, FITTINGS, AND VALVES OUTSIDE VAULT SHALL BE 4" FOR 3" SERVICE INSTALLATIONS. 10. A MINIMUM 2 FEET OF LEVEL UNOBSTRUCTED AREA IS REQUIRED AROUND HATCHES. METER SIZE*** MAIN SIZE OUT OF VAULT BYPASS R STOP FOR FLUSH PORT SIZE MIN. CLEARANCES VAULT MODEL VAULT COVER * (W/SPECIAL OFFSET) M. BALL CORP** A B C D 3" 4"D.I. 4" D.I. 2" 10" 16" 2'-8" 6" 577—LA 57TL-2-332P FB500-4 4" 4"D.I. 4" D.I. 2" 12" 16" 2'-8" 6" 676—WA 676—TW-2-332P FB500-6 6" 6"D.I. 6" D.I. 2" 12" 16" 3'-2" 6" 4484-1-A 4484—TL2-332P FB500-6 * COVER MODIFIED PER NOTE 5 ** MIPT CORP PER KEYED NOTE 15 ***VALVE, PIPE & FITTINGS INSIDE VAULT SHALL MATCH METER SIZE CITY OF EDMONDS PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 3", 4", 6" WATER SERVICE & METER NOTES REVISION DATE OCTOBER 2015 STANDARD D ETAI L APPROVED BY: R. ENGLISH I pI — aPrr 317 I 8.A.a I VERTICAL ` INSTALLATION ' [--3" (TYP) O ' TOP VIEW NO HIGHER THAN — EXIST GROUND 5' TO CENTER OF f #2 SHUT OFF VALVE TEST COCKS WITH PLUGS RESILIENT SEATED (4 REQ'D) SHUTOFF VALVES 3" (TYP) x (2 REQ'D) x CO � =_i ® 0 2 UNIONS REQ'D z 2 UNIONS REQ'D J x PLASTIC OR CEMENT CO METER BOX NOTES: SIDE VIEW 1. APPROVED DOUBLE CHECK VALVE ASSEMBLY TO LAY HORIZONTAL WITH GROUND IV H 2. DESIGNED FOR BACK SIPHONAGE AND BACK PRESSURE GRAVEL 3. TEST COCKS TO EITHER FACE OUTWARDS OR UPWARDS FROM ASSEMBLY (12" MIN) 4. ALL TEST COCKS MUST BE PROVIDED WITH PVC PLUGS 5. THOROUGHLY FLUSH LINES PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF BACK FLOW PREVENTER 6. THE DCVA CAN BE INSTALLED ABOVE OR BELOW THE GROUND PROVIDED ALL CLEARANCES ARE MET 7. DO NOT INSTALL IN AN AREA SUBJECT TO FLOODING 8. MUST BE PROTECTED FROM FREEZING CONDITIONS 9 THE BACK FLOW PREVENTION ASSEMBLY MUST BE A WASHINGTON STATE APPROVED MODEL 1 0-1 n 10. IF INSTALLED INSIDE A BUILDING THE DCVA SHALL BE INSTALLED NO HIGHER THAN 5 FEET FROM 12" MIN FLOOR TO C/L OF ASSY AND A MIN OF 12 INCHES FROM FLOOR TO BOTTOM OF ASSY FROM FL00 IF INSTALLED IN A VERTICAL CONFIGURATION, ASSY MUST BE A MINIMUM OF 12 INCHES FROM FLOOR, AND NO HIGHER THAN 5 FEET FROM FLOOR TO C/L OF #2 SHUT OFF VALVE *ONLY ASSY WITH APPROVAL FROM WADOH MUST BE TESTED AFTER INSTALLATION AND YEARLY THEREAFTER BY A WASHINGTON STATE CERTIFIED BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY TESTER. THE TEST REPORT MUST BE SENT TO THE CITY OF EDMONDS WATER DIVISION CITY OF EDMONDS RESIDENTIAL DOUBLE CHECK VALVE ASSEMBLY PUBLIC WORKS (DCVA) DEPARTMENT (STANDARD DCVA 2" & SMALLER) REVISION DATE OCTOBER 2015 STANDARD D ETAI L APPROVED BY: R. ENGLISH I Packet Pg. 318 I 8.A.a I REFER TO CHART Ti 4" HOSE CONNECTION W/ STORZ FITTING CHECK (AS REQ'D BY FIRE DEPT) VALVE �--6" (TYP) 18" MIN '' PIV — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — ' 18" MAX CONNECTION PRE —ASSEMBLED, DOH STATE' 18" MIN AS REQUIRED APPROVED DOUBLE CHECK I : MEGA LUG MID SPAN BY FIRE I DETECTOR VALVE ASSEMBLY I �' RESTRAINT AND THRUST MARSHAL FLxFL TEE BLOCK AND VAULT SEAL I SEE COE STD DTL E7.2.2 FLOW [17Im o 1 9 (TYP) i H i ®® EXTEND �' MEGALUGS I A LADDER OUT I FLANGED FITTING I z D AS REQUIREDI COUPLING ALL FOR EASY ,� ADAPTER PENETRATIONS ' I ° ACCESS I , SHALL BE CORE L°° — — — — — — — — — DRILLED AND % MADE WATER TIGHT''' USING SHRINK LSENSUS SR2 W/TRPL REMOTE READ LADDER PER APWA GROUT WITH THE TRPL SHALL BE INSTALLED ON STD PLAN #41 WATER SEAL HATCH CLOSE TO HINGE ALIGN WITH HATCH DOUBLE LEAF LID (MODEL—L.W. HATCH) OPENING TO BE LOCATED WITHIN 18" OF INSIDE VAULT WALL FOR EASIER LADDER ACCESS EXTERIOR PLAN VIEW NOTES: 1. ACCESSES BY L.W. HATCH: TYPE "D" (HD-10 PEDESTRIAN LOAD; H-30 TRAFFIC LOAD) WITH SIDE OUTLET GUTTER DRAIN. 2. DCDA MUST BE TESTED BY A CERTIFIED BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY TESTER. 3. ALL TEST COCKS MUST BE PROVIDED WITH PCV PLUGS. 4. A CITY APPROVED VALVE IS REQUIRED BETWEEN THE SUPPLY MAIN AND THE VAULT. 5. SEE COE STD DTLS E7.19 AND E7.20 FOR DCDA LOCATION AND CONNECTION REQUIREMENTS. VAULT SIZES METER SIZE AND TYPE APPROXIMATE EQUIPMENT DIMENSIONS MINIMUM INSIDE VAULT DIMENSIONS (EXCLUDES SIAMESE CONNECTION) A B C D LENGTH WIDTH HEIGHT 4" x 3/4" 2'-9" 1'-1" 0'-6" 4'-3" 10'-0" 5'-0" 6'-6" 6" x 3/4" 3'-9" 1'-2" 0'-8" 5'-6" 11'-0" 6'-0" 6'-6" 8" x 3/4" 4'-5" 1'-4" 0'-9" 6'-4" 12'-0" 6'-0" 6'-6" " x 1" ri 6'-0" 1'-8" 0'-11' 8'-6" 14'-6" 7'-0" NO HIGHER THAN 5' TO CENTER OF #2 SHUT Vtl OFF VALVE 6" MINIMUM FROM THE FLOOR a. SENSUS SR2 WITH ECR/WP REMOTE READ THE ECR/WP SHALL BE INSTALLED ON AN OUTSIDE WALL FOR EASY METER READING INDOOR VERTICAL INSTALLATION CITY OF EDMONDS DOUBLE CHECK DETECTOR ASSEMBLY (DCDA) PLAN PUBLIC WORKS (COMMERCIAL MULTI -FAMILY) DEPARTMENT REVISION DATE OCTOBER 2015 STANDARD D ETAI L s t 1 g 9" I APPROVED BY: R. ENGLISH I — parkn4 I Q I 8.A.a I * DOOR SIZE TO BE DETERMINED BY SIZE I� OF VAULT AND ACCESSIBILITY TO LADDER ~1 V 4" STORZ ADAPTER W/ 120' BEND V TRPL REMOTE -\ READ FINISHED DOUBLE LEAF TRAFFIC `GRADE BEARING LID WITH DRAIN / SLOTS LW HATCH I II _ a 4" HOSE DRAIN PIPE I I� CONNECTION W(AS REIRED DELLINOROCB)Y C — LI_ — BY FIIREQUDEPTT) < Z tl Z MEGA LUG MID SPAN RESTRAINT AND o THRUST BLOCK AND VAULT SEAL I I LADDER > I d SEE COE STD DTL E7.2.2 (TYP) a _ 1 I APWA STD t I (PLAN #41) EXTEND OUT s.:. AS REQUIRED 18" MIN iUBLE CHECK VALVES I I TO ALIGN (1YP) APPROVED OSY I I WITH HATCH d.4a I a AA f� FLOW 11 d a Z °:. 2 MINIMUM GRINNEL ° d A' PIPE SADDLE AND. d 10" FLOOR STAND #258 OR EQUAL DRAIN 6-5/8" MINUS C.S.T.C. COMPACTED TO 95% MAX. DENSITY w w 0 2" PVC DRAIN TO SUMP OR TIGHTLINE TO DRAI j DEPENDING ON SOIL/GROUNDWATER CONDITIONS i NOTES: \- WASHED DRAIN ROCK 1. ACCESSES BY LW HATCH: TYPE "D" (HD-10 PEDESTRIAN LOAD; H-30 TRAFFIC LOAD) WITH SIDE OUTLET GUTTER DRAIP ' 2. VAULT COVER GUTTER DRAIN SHALL CONNECT TO A DRY WELL OR CATCH BASIN. 3. SEE COE STD DTLS E7.19 AND E7.20 FOR DCDA LOCATION AND CONNECTION REQUIREMENTS. ; CITY OF EDMONDS DOUBLE CHECK DETECTOR ASSEMBLY (DCDA) PROFILE PUBLIC WORKS (COMMERCIAL MULTI -FAMILY), DEPARTMENT REVISION DATE OCTOBER 2015 STANDARD D ETAI L s t 1 g 9" I APPROVED BY: R. ENGLISH I Packet Pg. 320 I 8.A.a I BLIND FLANGE CAPPED CROSS CROSS ^' '"'^ FLANGE OR ER SIZE PIPE b b Bri B TEE 1:..� C CAP a TEE W/ PLUG C 90' BEND PLUG 45' BEND 22-1 /2' BEND 11-1 /4' BEND NOTES: 1. BEARING AREA OF CONCRETE THRUST BASED ON 200 PSI PRESSURE AND SAFE SOIL. BEARING LOAD OF 2,000 POUNDS PER SQUARE FOOT. 2. AREAS MUST BE ADJUSTED FOR OTHER PIPE SIZES, PRESSURES, AND SOIL CONDITIONS. THRUST BLOCK TABLE MIN BEARING AREA AGAINST UNDISTURBED SOIL SQUARE FEET MIN DIST (IN FEET) PIPE SIZE A B C D E b d 4" 3 1 1 1 1 1 0.5 6" 4 4 2 1 1 1 0.5 8" 7 6 4 2 1 1.3 0.7 10" 11 10 6 3 2 1.6 0.9 12" 16 14 9 5 3 1.9 1.1 16" 29 25 16 8 1 4 2.6 1.4 CITY OF EDMONDS PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 3. CONCRETE BLOCKING SHALL BE CAST IN PLACE AND HAVE A MINIMUM OF 1/4 SQUARE FOOT BEARING AGAINST THE FITTING. 4. THRUST BLOCK SHALL BEAR AGAINST FITTINGS AND UNDISTURBED SOIL. FITTING SHALL BE WRAPPED IN POLYETHYLENE FILM BEFORE PLACING CONCRETE. 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL BLOCKING ADEQUATE TO WITHSTAND FULL TEST PRESSURE AS WELL AS TO CONTINUOUSLY WITHSTAND OPERATIONAL PRESSURE UNDER ALL CONDITIONS OF SERVICE. 6. BLOCKING MAY BE REDUCED WITH USE OF RESTRAINED JOINT ADJACENT TO FITTINGS. 7. CONCRETE SHALL NOT COVER FITTING BOLT AND NUTS. CONCRETE THRUST BLOCKING REVISION DATE OCTOBER 2015 STANDARD D ETAI L s t 1 g 9" I APPROVED BY: R. ENGLISH I Packet Pg. 321 I 8.A.a I VERTICAL BLOCKING FOR 11 1/4'-22 1 /2'-30' BENDS PIPE SIZE V B CLI FT A D L 4" 11 1 /4' 8 2.0' 3/4" 1.5' 22 1 /2' 11 2.2' 2.0' 30' 17 2.6' 6" 11 1 /4' 11 2.2' 3/4" 2.0' 22 1 /2' 25 2.9' 30' 41 3.5' 8" 11 1 /4' 16 2.5' 3/4" 2.0' 22 1 /2' 47 3.6' 30' 70 4.1 ' 3/4" 2.5' 12" 11 1 /4' 32 3.2' 3/4" 2.0' 22 1 /2' 88 4.5' 7/8" 3.0' 30' 132 5.1' 16" 11 1 /4' 70 4.1 ' 7/8" 3.0' 22 1 /2' 184 5.7' 1 1 /8" 4.0' 30' 275 6.5' 1 1 /4" 20" 11 1 /4' 91 4.5' 1 7/8" 3.0' 22 1 /2' 225 6.1 ' 1 1 /4" 4.0' 30' 330 6.9' 1 3/8" 4.5' 24" 11 1 /4' 128 5.0' 1 " 3.5' 22 1 /2' 320 6.8' 1 3/8" 4.5' 30' 480 1 7.9' 1 5/8" 5.5' VERTICAL BLOCKING FOR 45' BENDS 4" 45' 30 3.1 ' 3/4" 2.0' 6" 68 4. 1' 8" 123 5.0' 12" 232 1 6.1 ' 3/4" 2.5' 16" 478 7.8' 1 1 /8" 4.0' 20" 560 8.2' 1 1 /4" 24" 820 9.4' 1 3/8" 4.5' CITY OF EDMONDS PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT PIPE CLAMP (HOT DIPPED GALVANIZED) WITH RODS (STAINLESS STEEL - / ALL THREAD 316SS) VER d. _ BEN fD 'D a d : \\� UNDISTURBE[ Q .a . a ° .°' EARTH ° SEE DETAIL W-5, A APPLIES TO ALL ANCHORS VERTICAL BLOCKING FOR 11 1 /4% 22 1 /2% & 30' BENDS PIPE CLAMP (HOT DIPPED GALVANIZED) WITH RODS (STAINLESS STEEL - ALL THREAD 316SS) SEE NOTE 3 (TYPICAL) D y .a \ UNDISTURBE[ a d EARTH A 1 21121LOCIm *>L6Z917Iz16 NOTES: FOR 45' BENDS 1. CONCRETE BLOCKING BASED ON 200 PSI PRESSURE AND 2500 PSI CONCRETE. 2. LEAVE BLOCK OPEN OR SHEETED 24 HOURS MINIMUM. 3. MEGA -LUG FITTINGS. VERTICAL BLOCKING FOR CONNECTION TO EXISTING MAIN REVISION DATE OCTOBER 2015 STANDARD D ETAI L s t 1 g 9" I APPROVED BY: R. ENGLISH I Packet Pg. 322 3 a� m c P'l I 8.A.a I PIPE CLAMPS & RODS (SEE NOTE 4) SEE DETAIL W-5, APPLIES TO ALL I ANCHORS PIPE CLAMPS & RODS (SEE NOTE 4) -1 -SEND D 6. • :. 'D D- •NOTE LLI A. d aQ+• e//\/� °a. .dam d ° ._a dp�e a e a da ° a A I A VERTICAL BLOCKING VERTICAL BLOCKING FOR 11 1 /4' & 22 1 /2' FOR 45' BENDS NOTES: 1. NO CHANGE IN PIPE DIRECTION OR DIAMETER SHALL OCCUR WITHIN 36 FEET OF THE VERTICAL BEND. BENDS, TEES, REDUCERS, ETC. BEYOND THE 36 FOOT LIMIT SHALL BE RESTRAINED BY STANDARD CONCRETE BLOCKING PER STD. DTL. E7.9 & E7.9.1. 2. CONCRETE BLOCKING SIZES BASED ON: • 36 FEET OF PIPE RESTRAINED EACH SIDE OF BEND. • THRUST BLOCK AREAS BASED ON SAFE BEARING LOAD OF 1,000 PSF. • 2,500 PSI CONCRETE. • MINIMUM 3 FEET OF COVER. • PIPE THRUST BASED ON 200 PSI PRESSURE. • PIPE ENCASED IN POLYETHYLENE. • VERTICAL BLOCK SIZE BASED ON CONCRETE WEIGHT OF 150 POUNDS PER CUBIC FOOT. • TRENCH CONDITIONS BASED ON TYPE 2, FLAT BOTTOM TRENCH WITH LIGHTLY CONSOLIDATED BACKFILL, PER ANSI/AWWA Cl 50/A21.50. • FACTOR OF SAFETY IS 1.5. • SOIL FRICTIONAL RESISTANCE BASED ON COHESIVE GRANULAR SOIL TYPE (GC+SC). SAND, GRAVEL, CLAY MIXTURE. 3. BLOCKING DESIGN MUST BE ADJUSTED FOR OTHER SIZE PIPE, PRESSURES AND SOIL CONDITIONS. 4. PIPE CLAMP (HOT DIPPED GALVANIZED). RODS (STAINLESS STEEL ALL -THREAD 316SS) 5. LINE SHALL NOT BE PRESSURIZED UNTIL ALL TRENCHING 5. WITHIN 100 FEET OF VERTICAL BEND IS BACKFILLED AND COMPACTED TO MINIMUM COVER OF 3 FEET OVER PIPE. 6. 90' VERTICAL BENDS SHALL ONLY BE INSTALLED WHERE GIVEN PRIOR APPROVAL BY THE UTILITY. 7. BACKFILL TRENCH BEYOND 90' VERTICAL BLOCK WITH CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE MATERIAL COMPACTED TO 95% MAXIMUM DENSITY. CRUSHED BACKFILL SHALL EXTEND 20 FEET BEYOND BLOCK OR TO FIRM BEARING TRENCH WALL, WHICHEVER IS LESS. 8. LEAVE BLOCK OPEN OR SHEETED 24 HOURS MINIMUM. 9. MEGA -LUG FITTINGS. CITY OF EDMONDS PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 0 W m 0 � 0 Z D PIPE CLAMPS & RODS (SEE NOTE VERTICAL BLOCKING FOR 90' BENDS (SEE NOTE 6) VERTICAL BLOCKING SIZE W/RESTRAINED JOINTS SOIL TYPE = COHESIVE GRANULAR [GC+SC] SAND, GRAVEL, CLAY MIXTURE PIPE SIZE V B CU FT A D L 4" 11 1 /4' 22 1 /2' 45' * 90' 16 2.5' 3/4" 2.0' 6" 11 1 /4' 22 1 /2' 45' 13 2.3' 3/4" 2.0' 90' 43 3.5' 3/4" 2.0' 8" 11 1 /'v 22 1 /2' 45' 33 3.2' 3/4" 2.0' 90' 86 4.4' 3/4" 2.0' 10" 11 1 /4' 22 1 /2' 13 2.3' 3/4" 2.0' 45' 64 4.0' 3/4" 2.0' 90' 141 5.2' 1 " 3.5' 12" 11 1/4' 22 1 /2' 20 2.7' 3/4" 2.0' 45' 111 4.8' 3/4" 2.0' 90' 206 5.9' 1 1 /8" 4.0' * BLOCKING NOT REQUIRED IF 36 FEET OF PIPE IS RESTRAINED ON EACH SIDE OF BEND VERTICAL BLOCKING WITH RESTRAINED JOINTS FOR NEW LINES REVISION DATE OCTOBER 2015 STANDARD D ETAI L s t 1 g 9" I APPROVED BY: R. ENGLISH I parkn4 Prr 373 3 I 8.A.a I T SIDE OF TRENCH WALL (TYP) SIDE OF TRENCH WALL D.I. PIPE SINGLE MAT #4'S ® 12" O.C. BW — 3" COVER ALL WAYS WIDTH OF TRENCH PLUS 36" D.I. PIPE SINGLE MAT #4'S ® 12" O.C. BW — 3" COVER ALL WAYS PIPE CLAMP AND J—BOLT OR ALL —THREAD WITH NUTS AND WASHERS PER DETAIL E7.9.4 PIPE SIZE DIMENSIONS A B C D E 4" 2.4 4.8 17 13 14.6 6" 3.5 6.9 18 14 14.5 8" 4.5 9.1 19 15 14.5 10" 5.6 11.1 20 16 14.4 12" 6.6 13.2 21 17 14.4 14" 7.7 15.3 22 18 14.3 16" 8.7 17.4 23 19 14.3 18" 9.8 19.5 24 20 14.2 D.I. PIPE ..•.. ail ®��' .. u • 9" 9" 18" MIN NOTES: SLOPES > 20% — PROVIDE CONCRETE SLOPE ANCHORS (20' TO 25' ON CENTER) CITY OF EDMONDS CONCRETE SLOPE ANCHOR PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 2500 PSI CONCRETE (CAST IN PLACE, REVISION DATE OCTOBER 2015 STANDARD D ETAI L APPROVED BY: R. ENGLISH I parks+ Pg. 324 I 8.A.a I JTY PIPE CLAMP (COOPER 33132 PIPE CLAMP OR EQUAL) 'ED GALVANIZED NUT TOP AND BOTTOM W/ FLAT WASHER (2) —BOLT (STAINLESS STEEL AND 'HREADED FOR CONNECTION TO PIPE ;LAMP) OR kLL THREADED ROD W/ 2 NUTS AND VASHERS (STAINLESS STEEL 316SS) NUTS/WASHERS HOOK NOTES: 1. J—BOLT DIAMETER: — PIPE DIAMETER LESS THAN OR EQUAL TO 6": 7/8", 6" & 8" PIPE: 1", 10" = 1-1/4" — PIPE DIAMETER GREATER THAN 12": 1-1/2" 2. TIGHTEN TOP NUTS TO TENSION BOLTS 3. TIGHTEN LOWER NUTS TO COMPRESS CLAMP SNUG CITY OF EDMONDS PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT PIPE CLAMP AND ANCHOR RODS FOR CONCRETE BLOCKING REVISION DATE OCTOBER 2015 STANDARD D ETAI L APPROVED BY: R. ENGLISH I parkn4 Pg. 325 ��5 � I 8.A.a I TOP VIEW TEST COCKS W/ PVC PLUGS (4 REQ'D) RESILIENT SEATED SHUTOFF VALVES (2 REQ'D) OO �/— OO MIN 12" CLEARANCES AROUND ADEQUATE GRAVITY DRAINAGE BACKFLOW PREVENTER — 12" MIN SYSTEM REQUIRED ALL SIDES, TOP AND BOTTOM 5' MAX W/ APPROVED AIR GAP GROUND/FLOOR NOTES: SIDE VIEW 1. APPROVED REDUCED PRESSURE BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY TO LAY HORIZONTAL ONLY. 2. DESIGNED FOR BACK SIPHONAGE AND BACK PRESSURE. 3. THOROUGHLY FLUSH LINES PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF BACKFLOW PREVENTER. 4. DO NOT INSTALL IN AN AREA SUBJECT TO FLOODING. 5. MUST BE ACCESSIBLE. 6. MUST BE PROTECTED FROM FREEZING CONDITIONS. 7. THE BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY SHALL BE A STATE APPROVED MODEL. 8. A PLUMBING PERMIT IS REQUIRED— PLEASE CONTACT LOCAL PLUMBING PERMIT CENTER. 9. MUST BE TESTED AFTER INSTALLATION AND YEARLY THEREAFTER BY WASHINGTON STATE CERTIFIED BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY TESTER. TEST RESULTS SHALL BE SENT TO THE CITY OF EDMONDS PUBLIC WORKS. (ABOVE GROUND INSTALLATION ONLY) REDUCED PRESSURE CITY OF EDMONDS BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY 2" PUBLIC WORKS AND SMALLER (RPBA) DEPARTMENT REVISION DATE OCTOBER 2015 STANDARD D ETAI L APPROVED BY: R. ENGLISH I Packet Pg. 326 I 8.A.a I w z J 0 w 0- 0 w 0- IF RPDA, USE SENSUS SR2 METER W/ TRPL REMOTE READ. TRPL SHALL BE INSTALLED ON SIDE OF HOT z BOX WITH EASY ACCESS FOR METER READING. UNION 3" MIN I� 3/8"x4" ANCHOR BOLTS (PER MANUFACTURER) CONCRETE SLAB z (2000 PSI MIN) N 4" MIN 6" MIN 1- PVC FREE DRAINING GRAVEL SLEEVE (TYP) TYPE K COPPER OR APPROVED z EQUAL (SIZE AS REQ) (TYP) co ENCLOSURE "HOT BOX" OR EQUAL REDUCED PRESSURE BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY (RPBA) 120 VOLT ELECTRICAL OUTLET FOR HEAT TAPE. INSTALL HEAT TAPE FOR FREEZE PROTECTION. IF RPDA, USE SENSUS SR2 METER W/ TRPL REMOTE READ UNION I CENTER BACKFLOW PREVENTER IN ENCLOSURE 3" MIN DRAIN SEE NOTE 6 12" PVC SLEEVE (TYP) SUPPORTS TYPE K COPPER OR APPROVED EQUAL (SIZE AS REQ) (TYP) 3" MIN 120 VOLT ELECTRICAL OUTLET FOR HEF TAPE. INSTALL HEAT TAPE FOR FREEZE �O PROTECTION. z N FINISHED GRADE 6x6 W2.9xW2.9 WWF (WELDED WIRE FABRIC) CONNECT TO WATER METER IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO RPBA FLOW TO OWNERS ELECTRICAL PANEL DIRECT BURIAL OR IN RIGID CONDUIT PER ELECTRICAL PERMIT REQUIREMENTS NOTES: SIDE VIEW FRONT VIEW (METER SIDE) 1. PROVIDE CITY APPROVED SUPPORT FOR DEVICES LARGER THAN 1" DIAMETER. 2. OWNER SHALL FURNISH, INSTALL AND MAINTAIN THE RPBA OR RPDA AND ALL PIPING AND APPURTENANCES SHOWN ON THIS PLAN. 3. CITY WILL PROVIDE INSPECTION. INITIAL TEST OF THE RPBA OR RPDA PRIOR TO ESTABLISHMENT OF WATER SERVICE WILL BE DONE BY A STATE CERTIFIED BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY TESTER. 4. REDUCED PRESSURE BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES SHALL BE STATE APPROVED DEVICES. 5. ANNUAL TESTING OF RPBA AND RPDA REQUIRED BY OWNER. TEST RESULTS SHALL BE SENT TO THE CITY OF EDMOND! PUBLIC WORKS. 6. DRAIN SHALL BE SIZED IN ACCORDANCE WITH AWWA CROSS CONNECTION CONTROL FIGURE 6-8 (SEE STD DETAIL SHEET E 7.1 1.1). 7. ENCLOSURES SHALL BE LOCATED ON PRIVATE PROPERTY. 8. SLEEVE SHALL BE ONE NOMINAL SIZE DIAMETER LARGER THAN PIPE BEING SLEEVED. HOT BOX ASSEMBLY FOR CITY OF EDMONDS REDUCED PRESSURE BACKFLO) PUBLIC WORKS ASSEMBLY (RPBA AND RPDA) DEPARTMENT REVISION DATE OCTOBER 2015 STANDARD D ETAI L s t 1 g 9" I APPROVED BY: R. ENGLISH I Packet Pg. 327 I 8.A.a I 175 150 100 N N W a 75 W z 0 N 25 AWWA CROSS CONNECTION CONTROL MANUAL RPBA DISCHARGE RATES N , 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 FLOW RATE (GPM) FIGURE 6-8 APPROXIMATE RELIEF VALVE DISCHARGE RATES FOR REDUCED PRESSURE BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES CARE SHOULD BE TAKEN TO ENSURE THAT THE ENTIRE DRAINAGE SYSTEM HAS ADEQUATE CAPACITY TO CARRY THE CONTINUOUS DISCHARGE RATES SHOWN ABOVE. THE FOLLOWING ARE TYPICAL FLOW RATES AS SIZED BY ONE FLOOR DRAIN MANUFACTURER AND REPRESENT ONLY THE FLOOR DRAIN CAPACITY: SIZE: 2" 3" 4" 6" 8" CAPACITY (GPM): 55 112 170 450 760 FOR PARALLEL ASSEMBLIES, THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM SHOULD BE DESIGNED FOR THE DISCHARGE FROM BOTH ASSEMBLIES. CITY OF EDMONDS PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT RPBA DISCHARGE RATES (FIGURE 6-8) REVISION DATE OCTOBER 2015 STANDARD D ETAI L APPROVED BY: R. ENGLISH I Packet Pg. 328 I 8.A.a I SENSUS SR2 W/ TRPL REMOTE READ. THE TRPL 24" MIN TEST COCKS SHALL BE INSTALLED ON (4 REQ'D) SIDE OF VAULT WITH EASY 0 0 0 o ACCESS FOR METER READING. ENCLOSURE "HOT BOX" ELECTRICAL OUTLET FOR OR CITY APPROVED EQUAL HEAT/FREEZE PROTECTION CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL 18" MIN AND PROVIDE HEAT/FREEZE RELIEF PROTECTION VALVE PLAN VIEW 3' MIN WHEN VALVE IS FULLY OPEN ELECTRICAL OUTLET FOR RESILIENT SEATED ANCHOR BOLTS HEAT/FREEZE PROTECTION SHUTOFF VALVES CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL �� (2 REQ'D) PER MANUFACTURER AND PROVIDE HEAT/FREEZE RECOMMENDATIONS PROTECTION 18" MIN ANCHOR BOLTS PER 18" MIN MANUFACTURER'S _ 0 RECOMMENDATIONS 4 DRAIN MIN DRAIN TOWARD ON SITE r2" 12" MIN — 4' MAX DRAINAGE SYSTEM, NOT FINISH GRADE1 TOWARD ROW � d.d 36" M I N SUPPORT STEEL SCREW JACK f L1/2" EXPANSION JOINT --Ll--- MATERIAL (TYP) VCONCRETE SLAB (3000PS) TO OWNER'S ELECTRICAL PANEL W/ 6x6 — W2.9xW2.9 WWF DIRECT BURIAL OR RIGID CONDUIT PER (WELDED WIRE FABRIC) ELECTRICAL PERMIT REQUIREMENTS SIDE VIEW NOTES: 1. APPROVED REDUCED PRESSURE BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY TO LAY HORIZONTAL ONLY. 2. DESIGNED FOR BACK SIPHONAGE AND BACK PRESSURE. 3. THE WATER LINE SHALL BE DISINFECTED, FLUSHED, AND PRESSURE TESTED PRIOR TO INSTALLING THE BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY. THE BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM FREEZING AND FLOODING. 4. ALL PIPE, VALVES, AND FITTING JOINTS, FROM SUPPLY MAIN, SHALL BE FLANGED AND RESTRAINED. 5. A CITY APPROVED VALVE IS REQUIRED BETWEEN THE SUPPLY MAIN AND THE VAULT. 6. HOT BOX SHALL BE INSTALLED AT PROPERTY LINE OR EASEMENT LINE. 7. HOT BOX SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM OF 3' CLEARANCE FROM ALL STRUCTURES. 8. THE BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY SHALL BE TESTED AFTER INSTALLATION AND PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE AND ALSO YEARLY THEREAFTER BY A CERTIFIED BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY TESTER. TEST RESULTS SHALL BE SENT TO THE CITY OF EDMONDS PUBLIC WORKS. 9. MECHANICALLY RESTRAIN ALL FITTINGS AND JOINTS BETWEEN CITY MAIN AND ASSEMBLY. (ABOVE GROUND INSTALLATION ONLY) CITY OF EDMONDS REDUCED PRESSURE DETECTOR ASSEMBLY PUBLIC WORKS (RPDA) 2.5" AND LARGER DEPARTMENT REVISION DATE OCTOBER 2015 STANDARD D ETAI L s t 1 g 9" I APPROVED BY: R. ENGLISH I Packet Pg. 329 I 8.A.a I SENSUS SR2 W/ TRPL REMOTE READ. THE TRPL 24" MIN TEST COCKS SHALL BE INSTALLED ON ` (4 REQ'D) SIDE OF VAULT WITH EASY 0 kq o ACCESS FOR METER ENCLOSURE READING. "HOT BOX" OR EQUAL ENCLOSURE "HOT BOX" ELECTRICAL OUTLET FOR OR CITY APPROVED EQUAL HEAT/FREEZE PROTECTION CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL 18" MIN AND PROVIDE HEAT/FREEZE RELIEF PROTECTION VALVE PLAN VIEW 3' MIN WHEN VALVE IS FULLY OPEN ELECTRICAL OUTLET FOR RESILIENT SEATED HEAT/FREEZE PROTECTION �� SHUTOFF VALVES ANCHOR BOLTS CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL (2 REQ'D) PER MANUFACTURER AND PROVIDE HEAT/FREEZE RECOMMENDATIONS PROTECTION 18" MIN 18" MIN ANCHOR BOLTS PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS 4" DRAIN — MIN DRAIN TOWARD ON SITE r2" 12" MIN — 4' MAX DRAINAGE SYSTEM, NOT FINISH GRADE 1 TOWARD ROW /���� \ 36" M I N ��'��'�.....�' SUPPORT STEEL SCREW JACK 1/2" EXPANSION JOINT MATERIAL (TYP) CONCRETE SLAB (3000PS) TO OWNER'S ELECTRICAL PANEL W/ 6x6 — W2.9xW2.9 WWF DIRECT BURIAL OR RIGID CONDUIT PER (WELDED WIRE FABRIC) ELECTRICAL PERMIT REQUIREMENTS SIDE VIEW NOTES: 1. APPROVED REDUCED PRESSURE BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY TO LAY HORIZONTAL ONLY. 2. DESIGNED FOR BACK SIPHONAGE AND BACK PRESSURE. 3. THE WATER LINE SHALL BE DISINFECTED, FLUSHED, AND PRESSURE TESTED PRIOR TO INSTALLING THE BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY. THE BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM FREEZING AND FLOODING. 4. ALL PIPE, VALVES, AND FITTING JOINTS, FROM SUPPLY MAIN, SHALL BE FLANGED AND RESTRAINED. 5. A CITY APPROVED VALVE IS REQUIRED BETWEEN THE SUPPLY MAIN AND THE VAULT. 6. HOT BOX SHALL BE INSTALLED AT PROPERTY LINE OR EASEMENT LINE. 7. HOT BOX SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM OF 3' CLEARANCE FROM ALL STRUCTURES. 8. THE BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY SHALL BE TESTED AFTER INSTALLATION AND PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE AND ALSO YEARLY THEREAFTER BY A CERTIFIED BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY TESTER. TEST RESULTS SHALL BE SENT TO THE CITY OF EDMONDS PUBLIC WORKS. 9. MECHANICALLY RESTRAIN ALL FITTINGS AND JOINTS BETWEEN CITY MAIN AND ASSEMBLY. (ABOVE GROUND INSTALLATION ONLY) CREDUCED PRESSURE CITY OF EDMONDS BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY PUBLIC WORKS (RPBA) 2.5" AND LARGER DEPARTMENT REVISION DATE AUGUST 2015 STANDARD D ETAI L s t 1 g 9" I APPROVED BY: R. ENGLISH I parkn4 Prr 3'3(1 I 8.A.a I 1" MIN ABOVE FLOOD LEVEL 6" MIN ABOVE FLOOD LEVEL FOR GENERAL PLUMBING FLOOD La NOTES: DCCII ICAIT CCATCM CUI ITn CC 1. APPROVED PRESSURE VACUUM BREAKER ASSEMBLY MUST BE INSTALLED VERTICALLY, 1- MIN ABOVE FLOOD LEVEL IF FACTORY MOUNTED OR 6" MIN ABOVE FLOOD LEVEL FOR GENERAL PLUMBING 2. DESIGNED FOR BACK SIPHONAGE ONLY, NOT FOR BACK PRESSURE 3. THOROUGHLY FLUSH LINES PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF BACKFLOW PREVENTER 4. IF A SVBA IS INSTALLED INDOORS, CONSIDERATION MUST BE GIVEN TO WATER LEAKAGE IF THE BACKFLOW PREVENTER FAILS (EXCESSIVE WATER SPILLAGE) 5. DO NOT INSTALL IN AN AREA SUBJECT TO FLOODING 6. MUST BE PROTECTED FROM FREEZING CONDITIONS 7. THE BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY SHALL BE A STATE APPROVED MODEL 8. A PLUMBING PERMIT IS REQUIRED- PLEASE CONTACT LOCAL PLUMBING PERMIT CENTER 9. MUST BE TESTED AFTER INSTALLATION AND YEARLY THEREAFTER BY WASHINGTON STATE CERTIFIED BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY TESTER TEST RESULTS SHALL BE SENT TO THE CITY OF EDMONDS PUBLIC WORKS (ABOVE GROUND INSTALLATION ONLY) SPILL -RESISTANT PRESSURE CITY OF EDMONDS VACUUM BREAKER (SVBA) PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT REVISION DATE OCTOBER 2015 STANDARD D ETAI L APPROVED BY: R. ENGLISH I Packet Pg 331 I 8.A.a I POTABLE WATER SUPPLY C OVERFLOW RIM AIR GAP 2xD — 1" MIN rrrrr�---rrrrrrr r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r _1»:Ze1T1IIo1_1I:9eL2�yI1J_122%1Lei 2; TO NON —POTABLE WATER SYSTEM PUMP AN APPROVED AIR GAP IS A PHYSICAL SEPARATION BETWEEN THE FREE FLOWING DISCHARGE END OF A POTABLE WATER SUPPLY PIPELINE AND THE OVERFLOW RIM OF AN OPEN OR NON — PRESSURE RECEIVING VESSEL. THESE VERTICAL, PHYSICAL SEPARATIONS MUST BE AT LEAST TWICE THE DIAMETER OF THE INLET PIPE BUT NEVER LESS THAN ONE INCH. IF SPLASHING IS A PROBLEM, TUBULAR SCREENS MAY BE ATTACHED OR THE SUPPLY LINE OUTLET MAY BE CUT AT A 45 DEGREE ANGLE. IF SUPPLY LINE IS CUT AT A 45 DEGREE ANGLE THE AIR GAP DISTANCE IS MEASURED FROM THE CENTER OF THE ANGLE. HOSES ARE NOT ALLOWED. BYPASSES ARE NOT ALLOWED. THE INSPECTION OF AIR GAPS SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE YEARLY TESTING PROGRAM FOR BACKFLOW DEVICES. CITY OF EDMONDS PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT AIR GAP FOR MAKEUP TANK (AG) REVISION DATE OCTOBER 2015 STANDARD D ETAI L APPROVED BY: R. ENGLISH I parkn4 Prr 3'39 I 8.A.a I STREAM 6" P 5' h GROUND/FLOOR NOTES: 1. APPROVED PRESSURE VACUUM BREAKER ASSEMBLY MUST BE INSTALLED VERTICALLY, 6" MIN ABOVE THE HIGHEST POINT OF USE AND ALL DOWN STREAM PIPING 2. 6" MIN ABOVE FLOOD LEVEL FOR GENERAL PLUMBING 3. DESIGNED FOR BACK SIPHONAGE ONLY, NOT FOR BACK PRESSURE 4. THOROUGHLY FLUSH LINES PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF BACKFLOW PREVENTER 5. IF AVB IS INSTALLED INDOORS, CONSIDERATION MUST BE GIVEN TO WATER LEAKAGE IF THE BACKFLOW PREVENTER FAILS (EXCESSIVE WATER SPILLAGE) 6. DO NOT INSTALL IN AN AREA SUBJECT TO FLOODING 7. MUST BE PROTECTED FROM FREEZING CONDITIONS 8. THE BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY SHALL BE A STATE APPROVED MODEL 9. A PLUMBING PERMIT IS REQUIRED— OBTAIN PERMIT FROM CITY OF EDMONDS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 10. NO DOWNSTREAM VALVES ARE ALLOWED 11. THIS DEVICE DOES NOT REQUIRE TESTING BY A BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY TESTER (ABOVE GROUND INSTALLATION ONLY) CITY OF EDMONDS PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ATMOSPHERIC/ANTI-SIPHON VACUUM BREAKER ASSEMBLY 2" & SMALLER (AVB) REVISION DATE OCTOBER 2015 STANDARD D ETAI L APPROVED BY: R. ENGLISH I parkn4 Prr 3'33 I 8.A.a I OCCII ICAIT l`CA-rC'M CLJI IT/1CC MIN. OF 6" CLEARANCE AROUND BACKFLOW PREVENTER. ALL SIDES, TOP AND BOTTOM NOTES: 1. APPROVED PRESSURE VACUUM BREAKER ASSEMBLY MUST BE INSTALLED VERTICALLY, 12" MIN. — 5' MAX ABOVE THE HIGHEST POINT OF USE AND ALL DOWN STREAM PIPING. 2. DESIGNED FOR BACK SIPHONAGE ONLY, NOT FOR BACK PRESSURE. 3. THOROUGHLY FLUSH LINES PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF BACKFLOW PREVENTER. 4. IF A PVBA IS INSTALLED INDOORS, CONSIDERATION MUST BE GIVEN TO WATER LEAKAGE IF THE BACKFLOW PREVENTER FAILS (EXCESSIVE WATER SPILLAGE). 5. DO NOT INSTALL IN AN AREA SUBJECT TO FLOODING. 6. MUST BE PROTECTED FROM FREEZING CONDITIONS. 7. THE BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY SHALL BE A STATE APPROVED MODEL. 8. A PLUMBING PERMIT IS REQUIRED— PLEASE CONTACT LOCAL PLUMBING PERMIT CENTER. 9. MUST BE TESTED AFTER INSTALLATION AND YEARLY THEREAFTER BY WASHINGTON STATE CERTIFIED BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY TESTER. TEST RESULTS SHALL BE SENT TO THE CITY OF EDMONDS PUBLIC WORKS. (ABOVE GROUND INSTALLATION ONLY) CITY OF EDMONDS PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT PRESSURE VACUUM BREAKER ASSEMBLY (PVBA) 2" AND SMALLER REVISION DATE OCTOBER 2015 STANDARD D ETAI L APPROVED BY: R. ENGLISH I Packet Pn 334 I 8.A.a I CONCRETE THRUST BLOCK PER COE STD DTL E7.9 MJxMJ ADAPTER MJ GV UPLING MAIN fM �St. 189v FLxMJ GV MJxFL TEE MJ GV 3' CONC BRICK SUPPORT F —1 Ix MAI N 3' MIN " (TYP) 2 SERVICE TAP PER COE STD DTL E7.6.1 4" DIP FIRE LINE 940 STYLE CAST IRON VALVE BOX AND EXTENSION INSTALL 12" RIBBED PVC MJxMJ DI LONG BODY COUPLING IWA�TERAIN CONC BRICK SUPPORT NUMBER OF BRICKS REQUIRED DEPENDS ON o AMOUNT OF OVER EXCAVATIO1 /TVD\ i NOTES: 1. CDF SHALL BE 3/4 SACK MIX DESIGN PER WSDOT STANDARDS. 2. BACKFILL SHALL BE PER COE STD DTL E4.2. CITY OF EDMONDS FIRE AND 2" DOMESTIC SERVICE CONNECTIONS PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT APPROVED BY: R. ENGLISH s REVISION DATE OCTOBER 2015 s STANDARD a D ETAI L Packet Pg. 335 I 8.A.a l CONCRETE THRUST BLOCKING SEE COE STD DTL E7.9 MJ—,- FLxFL TEE 3' MIN (TYP) FLxMJ RSGV (TYP) MJxMJ DI LONG BODY COUPLING ACP SURFACE 940 STYLE CAST INSTALL RIBBED PVC PIPE (ASTM D-3034) WHEN MATCH THICKNESS IRON VALVE BOX USING CDF BACKFILL ONLY (TYP FOR ALL VALVES) PER COE STD DTL E2.3 AND EXTENSION r 0 O 0 ' � of(n O� z FL0) m U 0 w� HLLJ� _ u 0 H 3 z rj 0 O _U I� sY� O� 0 r 0 Q U z MAIN COUPLING 0 0 w m ... °. •. • CONC BRICK SUPPORT UNDISTURBED '" ° NUMBER OF BRICKS REQUIRED DEPENDS ON SOIL : ° ;. ' ,• . AMOUNT OF OVER EXCAVATION (NATIVE) .. .. AF NOTE: 1. BACKFILL SHALL BE PER COE STD DTL E4.2. CITY OF EDMONDS TYPICAL WATER VALVE CLUSTER CONNECTION PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT s t 1 g 9" I APPROVED BY: R. ENGLISH s REVISION DATE OCTOBER 2015 s STANDARD a D ETAI L Packet Pg. 336 I 8.A.a I POURED THRUST BLOCK PER COE DETAIL E7.9 CONCRETE SUPPORT BLOCKS COMPACTED BEDDING GRAVEL PER SECTION 9-03.12(3) OF THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS DUCTILE IRON TAPPING TEE MECHANICAL JOINT SLEEVE INSTALLED ON CAST IRON PIPE AND DUCTILE IRON PIPE NOTES: POURED THRUST BLOCK PER COE DETAIL E7.9 3 x ID ONCRETE UPPORT LOCKS PER SECTION 9-03.12(3) OF THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS STAINLESS STEEL OR STEEL TAPPING TEE STAINLESS STEEL TAPPING TEE INSTALLED ON CAST IRON PIPE AND DUCTILE IRON PIPE STEEL TAPPING TEE INSTALLED ON DUCTILE IRON PIPE ONLY 1 STAINLESS STEEL TAPPING TEES SHALL HAVE FULL CIRCLE SEAL. BOLTS AND NUTS SHALL BE STAINLESS STEEL. 2. STEEL TAPPING TEES SHALL BE EPDXY COATED. BOLTS AND NUTS SHALL BE COR—TEN, OR STAINLESS STEEL. 3. ALL TEES AND VALVES TO BE WATER TESTED BEFORE TAP. 4. TAPPING TEE MAY NOT BE SIZE ON SIZE. TAP SHALL BE AT LEAST 2" SMALLER DIAMETER THAN THE EXISTING MAIN CITY OF EDMONDS PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT TAPPING TEES REVISION DATE OCTOBER 2015 STANDARD D ETAI L APPROVED BY: R. ENGLISH I Packet Pg. 337 I 8.A.a I SEE ENLARGED DETAILS E 7.18 � U EX WATER MAIN U UU 2" DOMESTIC SERVICE (COPPER) 4" FIRE LINE (MIN) (DIP) ° SIDEWALK . ° < PROPERTY WATER METER LINE I I I I � BLDG� DCDA \ / SEE RIGHT PROPERTY LINE ROW DEPTH TO MEET CLEARANCE REQUIREMENTS SEE ZJ DTL E7.8U FDC \ o J m 0 I O C U w z /PIV REMOTE READER U NOTES (BLDGS WITHOUT SETBACKS) 1. THE PIV AND FDC SHALL BE LOCATED LOCATED ON THE EXTERIOR WALL OF THE BUILDING OR IN A LANDSCAPED AREA. AT NO TIME SHALL THE PIV OR FDC BE LOCATED IN THE PUBLIC SIDEWALK. 2. THE DCDA SHALL BE LOCATED ON THE INTERIOR WALL OR IN A ROOM ADJACENT TO THE RIGHT-OF-WAY WHERE THE FIRELINE TIES INTO THE CITY MAIN. 3. THE PIV AND FDC SHALL HAVE A 3' MINIMUM CLEARANCE BETWEEN AND AROUND THEM. 4. THE SENSUS ECR/WP REMOTE READER SHALL BE PLACED ON THE EXTERIOR WALL OF THE BUILDING 4' ABOVE FINISHED GRADE. 5. THE FDC SHALL BE 4" PIPE AND HAVE A 22' BEND WITH 4" STORZ ADAPTER ON THE END. 6. THE WATER METER SHALL BE LOCATED AT THE PROPERTY LINE WHENEVER POSSIBLE. LOCATION OTHER THAN THE PROPERTY LINE, SHALL BE DETERMINED BY THE CITY INSPECTOR. CITY OF EDMONDS FIRE LINE & 2" DOMESTIC SERVICE CONNECTIONS (PLAN VIEW) PUBLIC WORKS (PLAN VIEW) ZERO —SETBACK DEPARTMENT BUSINESS/COMMERCIAL ZONE REVISION DATE OCTOBER, 201 ° STANDARD D ETAI L APPROVED BY: R. ENGLISH I Packet Pg. 338 I 8.A.a I EXIST WATER MAIN PROPERTY LINE SEE DETAIL E7.18 / 2" DOMESTIC SERVICE NA (COPPER) I 4" (MIN) FIRE LINE (DIP) RESILIENT GATE VALVES (TYP) SEE COE STD DTLS E7.18 AND E7.18.1 CURB J SIDEWALK NOTES SETBACK LINE PIV )P FDC °a :a DCDA & VAULT SEE DETAILS E7.8 & E7.8.1 BLDG 1. THE DCDA AND VAULT SHALL BE LOCATED ON PRIVATE PROPERTY AND NEXT TO THE RIGHT—OF—WAY LINE. 2.THE PIV AND FDC SHALL BE LOCATED ON PRIVATE PROPERTY AND SHALL BE NEAR THE DCDA. 3. THE PIV AND FDC SHALL HAVE A 3' MINIMUM CLEARANCE BETWEEN AND AROUND THEM. 4. THE FDC SHALL HAVE A 22' BEND WITH 4" STORZ ADAPTER ON THE END. FIRE LINE AND 2" DOMESTIC CITY OF E D M O N D S SERVICE CONNECTION (PLAN VIEW) PUBLIC WORKS ALL ZONES EXCEPT ZERO -SETBACK DEPARTMENT I BUSINESS/COMMERCIAL REVISION DATE OCTOBER 2015 STANDARD D ETAI L APPROVED BY: R. ENGLISH' PacketPn 339 I 8.A.a I 4-1 /4" 1 /8" MIN SEE [ 2" SQUARE OPERATING NUT gESS 2-1/4" INSIDE MEASUREMENT 2-1/4" DEPTH VALVE OPERATING NUT EXTENSION EXTENSIONS ARE REQUIRED WHEN THE VALVE NUT IS MORE THAN THREE (3) FEET BELOW FINISHED GRADE. EXTENSIONS ARE TO BE A MINIMUM OF ONE (1) FOOT LONG. ONLY ONE EXTENSION TO BE USED PER VALVE. NOTES: 1. ALL EXTENSIONS ARE TO BE MADE OF STEEL, SIZED AS NOTED, AND HOT DIPPED GALVANIZED. 2. INSTALL EXTENSIONS PERPENDICULAR TO THE WATER LINE VERTICAL ALIGNMENT. CITY OF EDMONDS PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT VALVE OPERATING EXTENSION REVISION DATE OCTOBER 2015 STANDARD D ETAI L APPROVED BY: R. ENGLISH I Packet Pg. 340 8.A.a C N t v APPENDIX H Packet Pg. 341 8.A.a E a� THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK L .N C d L L Q O U r O N O C O O C N N d L Q. Q Packet Pg. 342 LOZ 10 uoi;e;uasaad LW) nnainaN AouaBV L60Z aunt ueld uaa;sft .aa;eM spu0uap3 :;uauay3e11d a. m CITY OF EDMONDS a CROSS -CONNECTION CONTROL PROGRAM 1. INTRODUCTION Congress passed the "Safe Drinking Water Act" with the intent of protecting the public health and welfare of all public water supply users in the United States. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) interpreted this mandate to mean that certain contaminants should not be found in water delivered to the water meter or the property line. Thus, these contaminants became the responsibility of the water purveyor (City of Edmonds). The EPA specifically exempted contaminants added to the water under circumstances controlled by the user (except for plumbing corrosion by-products). This was not, however, intended to absolve the purveyor of a responsibility to conduct an aggressive cross connection control program. As required by the Washington State Department of Health, the City of Edmonds responsibility is to protect the water distribution system from contamination. The greatest public health risk lies in the introduction of a contaminant into the public water supply system because the water distribution system can provide the conduit for the spread of the contaminant to a large population. Cross connections within the customer's plumbing system and within the purveyor's distribution system pose a potential source for the contamination of the public water supply. Once water leaves the control of the water purveyor (i.e., leaves the distribution system), the water purveyor must consider the possibility that the water could become contaminated. Accordingly, the water purveyor must consider the plumbing systems of all customers to be a potential health hazard. The hazard, and thus the health risk, may vary from minor to severe. The purveyor's cross connection control program should be based on the supposition that all customers should be isolated at the property line (meter) with an approved air gap, unless the purveyor is satisfied with the level of protection provided by the customer. Notwithstanding this basic supposition, the water purveyor should recognize the practical needs of the customer, and the responsibility of other regulatory agencies to protect the customer's plumbing system from becoming contaminated. 3 L60Z 10 u01MUOSOM : L96Z) MOIAOb AOU06V L60Z eunr Mid W81S S JOIBM spuouap3 :4u8uay3844V Q - M a m The water purveyor's degree of satisfaction in the customer's reduction of their cross connection a risk, is a factor in the determination by the purveyor that the purveyor's requirement for premises isolation may be reduced from an approved air gap, to a reduced pressure backflow assembly, double check valve assembly, or no premises isolation. To protect occupants of the customer's premises, it is necessary to isolate areas of the premises and/or each outlet rather than to install backflow protection at the meter. Generally, the prevention of contamination of a water distribution system or potable water system in a building is of concern to the following: The water purveyor (City of Edmonds) The plumbing inspector (City of Edmonds) The local health inspector (Snohomish County Health District) The Dept. of Labor & Industries (worker safety regulations) A Cross connection program may be administered by any or all of the above. To avoid confusion, it is desirable for the water purveyor to have a joint or cooperative program with the other agencies having jurisdiction. Unfortunately, although each has the same overall goal of preventing contamination, each has a different enforcement criteria, authority and responsibility as well as jurisdictional area that may prevent a subordination of its authority to another agency. The need to eliminate cross connections as a source of potential contamination has been long recognized in plumbing design and plumbing code enforcement. However, plumbing codes handled cross connections only in very general terms. Few details are provided to specify methods of identifying and preventing cross connections. This is because it is impractical to cover in a plumbing code all of the information needed to control cross connections. The plumbing code addresses the plumbing design and installation in new buildings. Generally, once a building occupancy permit is given, plumbing code jurisdiction effectively ceases until a permit is requested to modify the plumbing system. Changes to a plumbing system are often made without a permit. New equipment may be added. Piping, fixtures and appliances may wear out, malfunction, or be relocated. New cross connections may then be created. Backflow prevention assemblies and devises installed under the plumbing code to protect the public could be removed, bypassed or fail to operate due to the lack of maintenance. For these reasons, it is recommended that a water purveyor not place full reliance on the enforcement of the plumbing code to protect the water distribution system from contamination through cross connections. The history of cross connection control has provided regulatory authorities with sufficient information to establish a list of those premises where high health hazard cross connections exist, or where the potential hazard is so great that these premises must be isolated from the water purveyor's system. Some states and provinces have established mandatory protection for these premises. However, it is important that each premise be surveyed individually to assess the degree of hazard and what corresponding backflow prevention assembly is required. All premises of the same kind may not require the same type of backflow protection. 4 LOZ 10 u011e1u8s8ad : LW) nnainaN AouaBV L60Z aunt ueld uaa;sft .aa;eM spu0uap3 :;uauay0e;;d d Experience has shown that the water purveyor is in a unique position to implement and administer a cross connection control program. The water purveyor has authority to supply water to a customer and to establish standards and remedies for a breach of those standards. The City of Edmonds cross connection control program is needed to effectively deal with all aspects of the public health risk posed by cross connections. A. Purpose The purpose of the City of Edmonds (COE) cross -connection control program (CCP) is to protect the public water system from contamination via cross -connection. Ordinance gives the COE the authority to operate the CCP, which meets the requirements of the State of Washington regulation WAC 246-290-490. B. Policy The COE will ensure that cross -connections between the distribution system and a customer's premises are eliminated or controlled by the installation of a State of Washington approved backflow preventer that is equal to the degree of hazard. The COE will operate a combination program whereby premises isolation requires backflow protection with an Air Gap (AG) or a Reduced Pressure Backflow Assembly (RPBA). In - premises isolation backflow protection (within the customer's property lines) will be permitted if there is no high health hazard and the CCS coordinates with the Local Administrative Authority (LAA). The final building construction approval and occupancy shall not be granted by the Local Administrative Authority until final cross -connection compliance is determined by site inspection performed by the Cross -Connection Control Specialist. The customer is responsible for the expense to protect the public water system from backflow contamination by installing, maintaining and testing backflow assemblies in accordance with the COE Cross -Connection Program (Section 3). Failure of the customer to cooperate in the installation, maintenance, repair, inspection or testing of backflow prevention assemblies required by COE shall be grounds for termination of water service to the premises. In the event the water purveyor must initiate action to enforce compliance with the Ordinance on this program, all costs incurred enforcing the action shall be borne by the property owner/business owner. The COE will refer to the Pacific Northwest Section AWWA Cross -Connection Control Manual Accepted Procedure and Practice most current edition and the current Manual of Cross -Connection Control (USC Manual) on issues concerning cross -connection control. LO M a. m M a. 5 LM 10 uoi;e;uasaad : L9LZ) MainaN A3u86d LLOZ aunt ueld w81sAS aa;eM spu0wP3 :4u0uayae1)V �a (.0 Q M a m M The COE will ensure that at least one person certified as a Cross -Connection Specialist a (CCS) is provided to develop and implement the cross -connection control program. Responsibilities include: 1. Administer the Cross -Connection Control Program (CCP). 2. Evaluate service connection for backflow hazards. 3. Reporting on the annual progress of the CCP. 4. Public Education. 5. Investigate water quality concerns where backflow is suspected. 6. Keep current records of all backflow preventer testing, air gaps installed in - lieu of approved backflow preventers, test kit calibration, and tester certification. 7. Responsible to eliminate or control cross -connections between the distribution system and the customer's premises. 8. Ensure quality control for backflow testing. 9. Inspect tank trucks and issue Hydrant Use Permits. 10. Complete Backflow Incident Response Forms and inform DOH, Snohomish County Health District, and the LAA of incidents involving contamination to the pubic water system. 11. Investigate all water quality complaints. 12. Review commercial and multifamily construction plans, city business license applications and any other means to identify the need for cross - connection control. C. Responsibilities The COE will not be responsible for any loss or damage caused by any negligence or wrongful act of a customer or his authorized representative in installing, maintaining, operating or using any and/or all appliances, facilities, or equipment for which water service is supplied. The customer will be held responsible for damage to COE facilities and other property resulting from the use and operation of appliances and facilities on the customer's premises, including damage caused by steam, hot water, chemical, etc. Edmonds Chapter 7.20 BACKFLOW PREVENTION Chapter 7.20 BACKFLOW PREVENTION Page 1/2 Sections: 7.20.010 Definitions. 7.20.020 Cross -connections declared unlawful. 7.20.030 Backflow prevention devices to be installed. 7.20.040 Private water supply systems. 7.20.050 Adoption of state regulations. 7.20.060 Abatement of unlawful cross -connections and installation of backflow prevention devices — Procedures 7.20.070 Penalties. 7.20.010 Definitions. A. "Backflow" means a flow, other than the intended direction of flow, of any foreign liquids, gases, or substances into the distribution system of a public water supply. B. `Backflow prevention device" means a device approved by the state of Washington, Department of Social and Health Services or such other state department as has jurisdiction over the subject matter and by the American Water Works Association, used to counteract back pressure or prevent back siphonage into the distribution system of a public water supply. C. "Cross -connection" means any physical arrangement whereby a public water supply is connected, directly or indirectly, with any other water supply system, sewer, drain, conduit, pool, storage reservoir, plumbing fixture or other device which contains or may contain contaminated water, sewage or other wastes or liquids of unknown or unsafe quality, which may be capable of imparting contamination to a public water supply as a result of backflow. [Ord. 1711 § 1, 1974]. 7.20.020 Cross -connections declared unlawful. The installation or maintenance of a cross -connection, which, in the opinion of the director of public works or his designee, will endanger the water quality of the potable water supply of the city of Edmonds, is unlawful. [Ord. 1711 § 1, 1974]. 7.20.030 Backflow prevention devices to be installed. Backflow prevention devices, when required to be installed in the opinion of the director of public works or his designated representative, shall be installed and maintained by the service customer on any service connection to the city of Edmonds water supply system where the backflow prevention devices are necessary for the protection of the city of Edmonds' water supply. [Ord. 1711 § 1, 1974]. 7.20.040 Private water supply systems. Use or operation of a private water supply system, contrary to the provisions of the ordinances of the city of Edmonds, or the laws of the state of Washington or the rules and regulations of the State Board of Health regarding public water supplies where the private system is served by the city public water supply is unlawful. [Ord. 1711 § 1, 1974]. 7.20.050 Adoption of state regulations. The community services director or his/her designee is hereby authorized to develop rules and regulations based upon and including the requirements of the rules and regulations of the State Board of Health regarding public water supplies and the protection of such supplies from contamination entitled "Cross -Connection Control Regulations in Washington State," the provisions of WAC 246-290-490, and the American Waterworks Association, Pacific Northwest Second Edition of "Accepted Procedure and Practice in Cross -Connection Manual." The provisions of the Washington Administrative Code, the rules and regulations of the Department of Health set forth in the Cross -Connection Control Regulations in Washington State and the previously referenced Accepted Procedure and Practice in Cross -Connection Manual are hereby adopted by this reference as fully as if herein set forth in full. Any additional rules and procedures necessary to implement such regulations shall be developed by the community services director or his/her designee as appropriate. Such rules and regulations shall be kept on file along with copies The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code are current through Ordinance 4061, passed March 23, 2017. Packet Pg. 347 Edmonds Page 2/2 Chapter 7.20 BACKFLOW PREVENTION of the above referenced regulations and manuals in the office of the city engineer of the city of Edmonds. [Ord. 2956 § 1, 1993; Ord. 1711 § 1, 1974]. r_ M a 7.20.060 Abatement of unlawful cross -connections and installation of backflow prevention devices — E Procedures. 43 Cross -connections declared in this chapter to be unlawful whether presently existing or hereinafter installed and/or services requiring backflow prevention devices and/or unlawful use or operation of a private water supply system served by the city public water supply are public nuisances and, in addition to any other provisions of this code or the ordinances of the city of Edmonds on abatement of public nuisances, shall be subject to abatement in accordance with the following procedure: > Z A. In the event that the director of public works or his designee determines that a nuisance as herein provided does d exist, written notice shall be sent to the person in whose name the water service is established under the records of d the city of Edmonds water division, or alternatively, a copy of such written notice shall be posted on the premises a served. o V B. The notice shall provide that the nuisance described herein shall be corrected within 30 days of the date the notice r- is mailed or posted on the premises. N C. In the event the nuisance is not abated within the prescribed time, water service to the premises shall be 4- discontinued. c o M D. In the event that the nuisance, in the opinion of the director of public works or his designated representative, presents an immediate danger of contamination to the public water supply, service from the city water supply system U) to the premises may be terminated without prior notice; provided, however, notice will be posted on the premises in a the manner heretofore provided at the time the service is terminated. [Ord. 1711 § 1, 1974]. ti m 7.20.070 Penalties. N In addition to the remedies set forth herein, any person found guilty of violating any of the provisions of this chapter 3 shall be subject to the penalties as set forth in ECC 5.50.020. [Ord. 1711 § 1, 1974]. m m c d a� Q ti T 0 N C 7 7 C R (L E Q The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code are current through Ordinance 4061, passed March 23, 2017. Packet Pg. 348 8.A.a City of Edmonds Water Production and Distribution Cross -Connection and Backflow What is a Cross -Connection? A cross connection is any actual or potential physical connection between a "potable water" line and any pipe, vessel, or machine containing non -potable fluid, solid or gas allowing possible entry to the water system by backflow. This would include, but is not limited to, sewers, drains, conduits, pools, storage reservoirs, plumbing fixtures, or any other device. The non -potable or unproved water supply system may contain contaminated liquids, solids, or gases, of unknown or unsafe quality. Bypass arrangements such as jumper connections, removable sections, swivel or changeover devices are considered to be a cross connection. What is Backflow? Backflow is a flow in reverse from the normal direction of flow in a piping system. It occurs due to a differential pressure existing between two different points within a continuous fluid system: a fluid of higher pressures flowing to a fluid of lower pressure. Backflow may occur due to either "backsiphonage" or "backpressure." Irrigation Systems If you have or are planning on installing an irrigation system, you must first comply with Washington State Law (WAC 245-290), and the City of Edmonds Ordinance Chapter 7-20. These Laws require that all irrigation systems have approved backflow protection. A plumbing permit is also required when installing an irrigation system. Without proper backflow protection, your irrigation system could endanger the health of your family, neighbors, and others in the community who are using the public water system. The following state approved backflow assemblies are required to be installed per the City of Edmonds Standards, and must be tested by a Washington State Certified Backflow Assembly Tester upon installation, repairs, relocation, and annually thereafter: Pressure Vacuum Breaker Assemblies (PVBA) Double Check Valve Assemblies (DCVA) Reduced Pressure Backflow Assemblies (RPBA) The atmospheric vacuum breaker is the only backflow prevention device that does not require annual testing. Improper installations of a State Approved Backflow Prevention Assembly or failure to have the backflow prevention assembly tested are grounds for termination of the water service. Packet Pg. 349 8.A.a On -site water wells If you have an on -site well and would like the City of Edmonds water service, you must first comply to Washington State Law (WAC 173-160 and WAC 246-290), and the City of Edmonds Ordinance (Chapter 7-20), before the city can install the water service. • Installation of a State Approved Reduced Pressure Backflow Assembly: If you elect to keep your well, you will need to install a State Approved Reduced Pressure Principle Backflow Assembly (RPBA) per City of Edmonds Standards above must be completed before the water can be turned on. • Abandonment of Your Well: If you elect to abandon your well, it must be properly abandoned using a licensed well driller. The licensed well driller will abandon the well per Washington State Law (WAC 173-160). Capping the well or pulling the pump is NOT proper abandonment; therefore the installation of a State Approve Reduced Pressure Backflow Prevention Assembly is required. Improper installation of the State Approved Backflow Prevention Assembly or the improper abandonment of the well is grounds for termination of the water service. If you have any questions concerning backflow installations, certified testers, or approved backflow prevention assembly, please call the Public Works Department at 425-771-0235, extension 1644 or by email Jeff.Kobylk@edmondswa.gov. WordataNVater/Cross Connection/Info for Web Site Packet Pg. 350 8.A.a C N E t v APPENDIX I Packet Pg. 351 8.A.a E a� THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK L .N C d L L Q O U r O N O C O O C N N d L Q. Q Packet Pg. 352 Edmonds Chapter 19.25 FIRE CODE Chapter 19.25 FIRE CODE Sections: 19.25.000 International Fire Code adopted. 19.25.005 Section amendments. 19.25.010 Department of fire prevention. 19.25.015 Definitions. 19.25.020 Permits. 19.25.025 Charges for fire review and inspection. 19.25.030 Modifications, interpretations and appeals. 19.25.035 Automatic sprinkler systems. 19.25.036 Dwelling fire sprinkler systems and connection fees. 19.25.040 Fire protection water supplies. 19.25.045 Charges for water mains and hydrants. 19.25.050 Mains and service lines. 19.25.055 Location of public hydrants. 19.25.060 Location of private hydrants. 19.25.065 Hydrant specifications. 19.25.070 Penalties. Page 1/6 19.25.000 International Fire Code adopted. Under the statutory authority of RCW 19.27.031 and 19.27.074, the International Fire Code (IFC), 2015 Edition, as published by the International Code Council including amendments set forth in Chapter 51-54A WAC, and subsequently revised by this chapter, is hereby adopted including reference standards of the National Fire Protection Association and Appendix Chapters B and C. [Ord. 4029 § 1 (Att. A), 2016; Ord. 3926 § 1 (Exh. A), 2013; Ord. 3798 § 1, 2010]. 19.25.005 Section amendments. The following sections of the IFC have been added, amended, deleted or replaced as follows: A. Chapter 1 Administration. 1. Section 102.5 Application of Residential Code. Adopted as originally set forth in IFC (notwithstanding revisions thereto by the state building code council). 2. Section 103.1-.2 Department of Fire Prevention. Replaced by ECDC 19.25.010. 3. Section 104.8 Modifications. Replaced by ECDC 19.25.030. 4. Section 104.10.1 Assistance from other agencies. Police and other enforcement agencies shall have the authority to render necessary assistance in the investigation of fires and enforcement and hazardous conditions of this code when requested by the fire marshal. 5. Section 105.1.1 Permits required. Replaced by ECDC 19.25.020. 6. Section 108 Board of appeals. Replaced by Chapter 19.80 ECDC. 7. Section 109.4 Violation Penalties. Replaced by ECDC 19.25.070. B. Chapter 3, General Requirements. Section 308.1.6.3 Sky Lanterns. Is amended to read: It is unlawful for any person to sell, use, transfer, discharge or ignite any sky lantern within the city limits. The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code are current through Ordinance 4061, passed March 23, 2017. Packet Pg. 353 Edmonds Chapter 19.25 FIRE CODE C. Chapter 5, Fire Service Features. Section 503 Fire Apparatus Access Roads. The following sections are adopted as originally set forth in the IFC with the exception of 503.2.2: 1. Section 503.1 Where required. 2. Section 503.1.1 Buildings and facilities. 3. Section 503.1.2 Additional access. 4. Section 503.1.3 High -piled storage. 5. Section 503.2 Specifications. 6. Section 503.3 Marking. 7. Section 503.4 Obstruction of fire apparatus access roads. Section 503.2.2 is amended to read: Authority. The fire code official shall have the authority to require an increase in the minimum access widths where they are inadequate for fire or rescue operations, and the authority to decrease the minimum access widths where other fire protection features are provided. D. Chapter 36, Marinas. Replaced in entirety by Chapter 19.65 ECDC. E. Chapter 56, Explosives and Fireworks. Section 5601.1.3 Fireworks. Replaced by Chapter 5.27 ECC. F. Chapter 57 Flammable and Combustible Liquids. Sections 5704.2.9.6.1 (outside) and 5706.2.4.4 (inside) Locations where above -ground tanks are prohibited. Class I and II flammable liquids in aboveground storage tanks are restricted for the protection of residential districts and shall be no more than 1,000 gallons capacity in residential zones designated by the city. G. Chapter 61 Liquefied Petroleum Gases. Section 6104.2 Maximum capacity within established limits. The maximum capacity for each installation is restricted for the protection of residential districts within the city and shall be no more than 500 gallons water capacity in residential zones designated by the city. [Ord. 4029 § 1 (Att. A), 2016; Ord. 3926 § 1 (Exh. A), 2013; Ord. 3798 § 1, 2010]. Page 2/6 19.25.010 Department of fire prevention. A. There is established in the city a department of fire prevention supervised by the fire marshal or deputy chief of fire prevention acting under the supervision of the fire chief. The function of the department shall be the implementation, administration and enforcement of the provisions of this code. B. An annual report shall be provided to the mayor containing proceedings under this code, with other statistics as the fire chief and mayor wish to include. The fire marshal may also recommend any changes to the code. [Ord. 4029 § 1 (Att. A), 2016; Ord. 3926 § 1 (Exh. A), 2013; Ord. 3798 § 1, 2010]. 19.25.015 Definitions. A. Whenever the term "fire code official" is used in the IFC, it shall mean the fire marshal or deputy chief of fire prevention. The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code are current through Ordinance 4061, passed March 23, 2017. Packet Pg. 354 Edmonds Chapter 19.25 FIRE CODE B. Whenever the word "jurisdiction" is used in the IFC, it shall mean the city of Edmonds. Page 3/6 C. Whenever the term "legal representative of the jurisdiction" is used in the IFC, it shall mean the city attorney D. Whenever the term "police" is used in the IFC, it shall mean the city of Edmonds police department. [Ord. 4029 § 1 (Att. A), 2016; Ord. 3926 § 1 (Exh. A), 2013; Ord. 3798 § 1, 2010]. 19.25.020 Permits. A. Operational permits required under the city's fire code and regulated by the city shall be issued by the fire marshal. The application for the permit shall be accompanied by the full application fee in order to vest rights under the permit and to constitute a complete permit application. The permit fee shall be set by the city council annually by resolution or on such review cycle as the council, in its discretion, shall determine. All permits shall be renewed annually unless the specific time period is set forth when the permit is granted. No permit shall be transferable and each permit shall be issued on a single job, transaction, owner, or occupancy basis, except that the fire marshal is authorized to consolidate permits for a single location, building, or unit. B. In the event that the activity, location or risk associated with the activity requires a fire safety inspection in excess of the time estimated within the permit fee (one hour) an inspection fee equal to the actual cost to the city of providing the inspection shall be charged pursuant to ECDC 19.25.025. [Ord. 4029 § 1 (Att. A), 2016; Ord. 3926 § 1 (Exh. A), 2013; Ord. 3798 § 1, 2010]. 19.25.025 Charges for fire review and inspection. A. Certain licenses and permits issued by the city include a fire department inspection. The cost of the permit may include an estimate of the normal time associated with the fire inspection. Where the permit does not include such an estimate, or when the estimate of time established within the ordinance is exceeded by the actual time spent inspecting a premises, location or activity, the actual cost of conducting the inspection shall be charged. The administrative services director is authorized to establish on an annual basis, in conjunction with or immediately following the budget process, a fee for the hourly charge associated with the provision of services by reasonable classifications of fire marshal and fire inspector. B. The permittee shall pay the actual charges of inspection, in addition to the permit fee associated with such activity. Licenses and permits requiring the actual payment of inspection charges include, but are not limited to, public amusement licenses issued pursuant to Chapter 4.32 ECC, cabaret dance licenses issued pursuant to Chapter 4.48 ECC, adult entertainment facility licenses issued pursuant to Chapter 4.52 ECC, business licenses issued pursuant to Chapter 4.72 ECC, and aircraft landing licenses issued pursuant to Chapter 4.80 ECC. C. No charge shall be levied against any department or agency of the city of Edmonds operating within the city's general fund. [Ord. 4029 § 1 (Att. A), 2016; Ord. 3926 § 1 (Exh. A), 2013; Ord. 3798 § 1, 2010]. 19.25.030 Modifications, interpretations and appeals. A. The fire marshal shall have the authority to modify any of the provisions of the IFC or this chapter on written application by the owner, lessee, or his duly authorized agent when there are practical difficulties in carrying out the strict letter of the code. Approved modifications, including alternative materials and methods, shall observe the spirit of the code, preserve fire- and life -safety, secure the public health, and do substantial justice. A signed copy of approved modifications shall be promptly given to the applicant. B. Details of actions granting modifications and related interpretations shall be recorded and preserved in the records of the department of fire prevention to aid in conformance and uniform application of related codes, ordinances, and standards. C. Whenever the fire marshal disapproves an application or refuses to grant a permit applied for, or when it is claimed that the provisions of the code do not apply or that the true intent and meaning of the code have been misconstrued or wrongly interpreted, the applicant may appeal from the decision of the fire marshal to the hearing examiner. Such appeals shall be governed by the procedures set forth in Chapter 19.80 ECDC. [Ord. 4029 § 1 (Att. A), 2016; Ord. 3926 § 1 (Exh. A), 2013; Ord. 3798 § 1, 2010]. The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code are current through Ordinance 4061, passed March 23, 2017. Packet Pg. 355 8.A.a Edmonds Page 4/6 Chapter 19.25 FIRE CODE 19.25.035 Automatic sprinkler systems. An automatic sprinkler system shall be installed and maintained throughout every building constructed under the International Residential Code containing five or more attached dwelling units. Residential or quick response a standard sprinkler heads shall be used in accordance with their approved listing in the dwelling. [Ord. 4029 § 1 (Att. E A), 2016; Ord. 3926 § 1 (Exh. A), 2013; Ord. 3798 § 1, 2010]. y 19.25.036 Dwelling fire sprinkler systems and connection fees. � A. Where dwelling fire sprinkler systems are required to be installed in a dwelling (building containing one or two 4) dwelling units) constructed under the International Residential Code (IRC), a single water connection may provide fire protection and domestic services through combination water lines utilizing an integrated fire and plumbing > flow -through piping system described in IRC Appendix R (WAC 51-51-60105). Z B. Automatic sprinkler systems installed pursuant to subsection (A) of this section shall not be subject to the cost c d d differential from general facility charges for connection to the public water system when an up -sized meter is a required to meet the design flow rate for, and is solely attributable to, the installation of the automatic sprinkler E system. All other costs, including the expense of a larger meter, a general facility charge attributable to the meter V sized for the domestic service alone, and other permits and fees, shall remain the responsibility of the owner. n C. When automatic sprinkler systems designed for life safety and installed pursuant to subsection (A) of this section 0 - are integrated and dependent upon the domestic water supply of the residential dwelling unit, the property owner r_ shall be responsible for maintaining the service connection and paying for an adequate supply of water to the C residential dwelling unit. [Ord. 4029 § 1 (Att. A), 2016; Ord. 3926 § 1 (Exh. A), 2013; Ord. 3819 § 3, 2010]. M .r c d 19.25.040 Fire protection water supplies. All fire hydrant, water main and appurtenance installations shall meet the provisions of this chapter as well as other IL applicable plans, standards and codes adopted by the city of Edmonds, as a condition of approval of subdivisions and building permits. [Ord. 4029 § 1 (Att. A), 2016; Ord. 3926 § 1 (Exh. A), 2013; Ord. 3798 § 1, 2010]. m r N 19.25.045 Charges for water mains and hydrants. A. For private development, owners shall be responsible for the replacement (upgrade) of the existing public main m (including fire hydrants and appurtenances) to city standard when identified by the city engineer as a condition of development approval. The city will pay the difference in material costs only between six inches and the size that is required to be installed only when the existing system is a looped system. d B. A hydrant use permit issued by the public works director is required in order for any person or entity other than Q fire department personnel to draw water from any fire hydrant. i• C. The installation of water mains, fire hydrants and appurtenances to properties not previously served shall be sized T 0 N m in accordance with the city's water comprehensive plan, built to city standard and shall be at the benefited property owner's or developer's expense. c M D. Oversized water mains required for special use demands relating to a particular property or development shall be a installed at the developer's or property owner's expense. E d E. If the water mains installed pursuant to subsections (C) and (D) of this section provide service or benefits to N properties other than owned by the water main installer, latecomer agreements may be arranged between the city and the installer for the construction and dedication of the water facilities pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 35.91 RCW. [Ord. 4029 § 1 (Att. A), 2016; Ord. 3926 § 1 (Exh. A), 2013; Ord. 3798 § 1, 2010]. ?� 19.25.050 Mains and service lines. c A. All public hydrants in single-family areas shall be supplied by not less than six-inch looped water mains. All G hydrants in areas other than single-family residential shall be supplied by not less than eight -inch looped water w mains. Dead-end water mains to hydrants shall be at least eight inches in diameter, with the exception of mains up to 50 feet long which may be no less than six inches in diameter. d E B. The service line from the water main to the hydrant shall be no less than six inches in diameter. Any service lines over 50 feet in length from water main to hydrant shall be no less than eight inches in diameter. M Q The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code are current through Ordinance 4061, passed March 23, 2017. Packet Pg. 356 8.A.a Edmonds Page 5/6 Chapter 19.25 FIRE CODE C. When city streets, or state highways having water mains in the public right-of-way, are improved to permanent street or highway improvement standards, any water mains in the public right-of-way of said streets or highways 0 that are substandard as to size or material according to applicable city standards shall be replaced with ductile iron a water mains conforming to applicable city standards and plans. [Ord. 4029 § 1 (Att. A), 2016; Ord. 3926 § 1 (Exh. E A), 2013; Ord. 3798 § 1, 2010]. 19.25.055 Location of public hydrants. � A. Public hydrants are those owned by the city. 4) B. All public fire hydrants shall be installed at street intersections where possible. Public hydrant spacing shall be W measured along vehicle access routes. > .y C. In areas zoned for single-family residential use, public hydrants shall be spaced no more than 600 feet apart. If c dead-end streets, or driveways, singly or in combination, are over 300 feet long, additional public hydrants shall be a installed so that the public hydrant spacing is not over 600 feet. E 0 D. In areas other than single-family residential, public fire hydrants shall be spaced an average of 300 feet apart. If n dead-end streets or driveways, singly or in combination, are over 150 feet long, additional public hydrants shall be c installed so that the public hydrant spacing is not over 300 feet. [Ord. 4029 § 1 (Att. A), 2016; Ord. 3926 § 1 (Exh. N A), 2013; Ord. 3798 § 1, 2010]. 0 0 19.25.060 Location of private hydrants. A. A private hydrant is privately owned, but is subject to the use of the city for inspection and testing at reasonable times, and for fire suppression at any time. All private hydrants shall be connected to the city water main through a U) privately owned and maintained double detector check valve assembly. a B. All buildings except single-family dwellings that are located so that a portion is more than 200 feet from a street, as measured along vehicle access routes, shall have private fire hydrants located at the building. Single-family N dwellings with a fire -flow calculation area greater than 4,800 square feet may require a private hydrant. 3 C. Buildings having required fire flows of 3,000 gallons per minute may have fire hydrants on one side of the m building only. There shall never be fewer than two fire hydrants for any building larger than 5,000 square feet in the W first floor area including covered parking and storage. When the required fire flow is 3,000 gallons per minute or greater, the fire hydrants shall be served by a looped main around the building or complex of buildings. D. Fire hydrants shall be spaced on an average 300 feet around the perimeter line, 50 feet out of the buildings. All a� ti hydrants shall be placed in locations accessible to fire department vehicles adjacent to fire apparatus access roads. c The fire marshal shall determine the location of fire hydrants depending on utility, topography and building location N for maximum fire protection. [Ord. 4029 § 1 (Att. A), 2016; Ord. 3926 § 1 (Exh. A), 2013; Ord. 3798 § 1, 2010]. 19.25.065 Hydrant specifications. A. The installation of flush type hydrants (hydrants entirely below grade) is prohibited. a E B. Fire hydrants shall have two two -and -one -half -inch hose outlets and one four -and -one -half -inch pumper outlet. d All outlets' ports shall have national standard thread. Additionally, the pumper outlet shall be provided with a �% four -inch Storz adapter. Fire hydrants shall meet the American Water Works Association Standard No. C-502 and N L current city standards. a) C. Fire hydrants and appurtenances shall be installed in accordance with generally accepted engineering practices and city standards, and to the approval of the city engineer, who shall also approve the selection and use of all pipe fittings and valves. There shall be a foot valve installed between the service main and the hydrant sufficient to 0 permit the repair and replacement of the hydrant without disruption of water service. The foot valve shall be 'a installed to city standards. The location of all such valves installed shall be properly and accurately marked on w as -built plans or drawings with generally acceptable engineering detail, two copies of which shall be furnished to the d public works department. Valves shall be furnished with a standard valve box. E z 0 Q The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code are current through Ordinance 4061, passed March 23, 2017. Packet Pg. 357 Edmonds Page 6/6 Chapter 19.25 FIRE CODE D. Hydrants shall stand plumb, be set to established street grade with the lowest outlet of the hydrant at least 18 inches above the adjacent finished grade and at least 36 inches of clear area around the hydrant for clearance of hydrant wrench on both outlets and on the control valve. The pumper port shall face the street, as determined by the a fire marshal. E m E. Where reasonably necessary to protect a hydrant from damage, the fire marshal may require hydrants to be >% protected by two or more posts, eight inches in diameter by five feet long, made either of reinforced concrete or � steel. °' c� F. If there presently exist fire hydrants which do not conform to these requirements, they shall be replaced with 4) conforming hydrants upon redevelopment or the timetable established by the city's comprehensive plan. Z G. No person shall plant any vegetation, erect any structure or perform any action which results in the obstruction of c a fire hydrant for a distance of 50 feet along the immediate route of approach. The owner -occupant of any area in a which a hydrant is located shall be responsible for removing weed and tree growth from around the hydrant for a E distance of not less than five feet. The purpose of this section is to maintain clear approach and visual area around V the hydrant. r� H. The installation of the fire hydrants and mains may be accomplished by city capital contract, developers (as a 0 N condition of development) or public works department employees. All installations are to be approved by the city c engineer. o M I. Following the installation of fire hydrants, all pipes, valves and hydrants shall be pressure tested, purified, flushed and sampled to meet the requirements of the American Water Works Association Standard No. C-502. [Ord. 4029 § U) 1 (Att. A), 2016; Ord. 3926 § 1 (Exh. A), 2013; Ord. 3798 § 1, 2010]. a 19.25.070 Penalties. A. Any person who violates any of the provisions of the IFC including those standards of the National Fire 54 Protection Association specifically referenced in the IFC as adopted and amended herein or fails to comply therewith, or who violates or fails to comply with any order made thereunder, or who builds in violation of any m detailed statement of specifications or plans submitted and approved thereunder, and from which no appeal has been taken, or who fails to comply with such an order as affirmed or modified by decision of the city's board of appeals or by a court of competent jurisdiction, within the required time, shall severally for each and every such violation and noncompliance, respectively, be guilty of a gross misdemeanor, punishable as provided in ECC 5.50.020. a� B. The imposition of one penalty for any violation shall not excuse the violation nor permit it to continue; and all ti such persons shall be required to correct or remedy such violations or defects within a reasonable time; and when c not otherwise specified, each day that prohibited conditions exist or are maintained shall constitute a separate N m offense. The application of the above penalty shall not be held to prevent the enforced removal of prohibited conditions. [Ord. 4029 § 1 (Att. A), 2016; Ord. 3926 § 1 (Exh. A), 2013; Ord. 3798 § 1, 2010]. c M IL E a� Cn L O E W E ci Q The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code are current through Ordinance 4061, passed March 23, 2017. Packet Pg. 358 8.A.a C N E t v APPENDIX J Packet Pg. 359 8.A.a E a� THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK L .N C d L L Q O U r O N O C O O C N N d L Q. Q Packet Pg. 360 0 M n U) -0r �z � Cn� * 0ZCn D ZO�o0 O0-�DD� �m moo rnD Annual Water Quality Report This report contains information about your drinking water, required by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) The bottom line is this: Our water is safe to drink. Our water quality meets or exceeds state and federal standards. I Edmonds Water Source: Where our drinking water comes from long with most residents within the City of Edmonds, you receive your water from Everett's Spada Reservoir in the Sultan Basin, which is considered surface water. Our water source is disinfected with chlorine, which destroys Giardia, bacteria and viruses that may be present in the source water. Our water source also adds fluoride to prevent tooth decay. Everett Surface Water Source The Sultan Basin watershed, which fills Spada Reservoir, is protected and patrolled regularly. This watershed receives more than 160 inches of rain each year. Water from Spada Reservoir is routed by pipe to Chaplain Reservoir. There, this pristine high quality mountain water is treated at the City of Everett's filtration plant before being distributed for consumption. From the source, the greatest care is taken to ensure the water you use meets federal and state requirements as well as Everett's own high local standards. Along its way to your tap, the water is tested frequently for microbiological and chemical quality to ensure you receive safe water each time you use your faucet. The City of Everett provides this water for their own customers and numerous other water utilities. The City of Edmonds purchases Everett's water through Alderwood Water District, Alderwood Water District also supplies several other water utilities within Snohomish county. Edmonds Distribution System: Within the City of Edmonds water distribution system, there are three 1.5 million gallon and one 3.0 million gallon reservoirs. There are numerous connections throughout the Edmonds water system to other water systems including Seattle, Lynnwood, and Olympic View Water and Sewer District in case additional water is needed. The City of Edmonds water system identification number is 22500U, issued by the State of Washington Department of Health. 8.A.a 2014 Water Quality Monitoring The 2014 water quality monitoring results listed in the following tables show no contaminants were measured at or above allowable levels. The sources of all drinking water (both tap water and bottled water) include rivers, lakes, streams, ponds, reservoirs, springs and wells. As water travels over the surface of the land or through the ground, it dissolves naturally occurring minerals, which can be vulnerable to contamination. In Edmonds water supply, these potential contaminants and their sources include: Microbial contaminants, such as viruses and bacteria, from wildlife; Inorganic contaminants, such as salts and metals, which are naturally occurring, and; Organic contaminants, which are by-products of the water chlorinataing processes. Managing the Distribution System key to maintaining good water quality is effectively managing the water distribution system. It is important for water to remain fresh and retain sufficient chlorine for disinfection. The City has a flushing program and also has a cross - connection prevention program designed to keep any contaminants coming from homes and businesses from entering the drinking water system. Please call us at 425.771-0235 if you would like more information on the water system. ti O N O c W N i a cc N M 2014 WATER QUALITY DATA Possible Water Quality Concerns Parameter Units EPA's Allowable Limits Alderwood Water Typical Sources Comply MCLG MCL RANGE OR AVERAGE VALUE OR OTHER OTHER HIGHEST RESULT Fluoride ppm 2 4 0.2 - 0.9 0.8 Dental additive Yes Nitrate ppm 10 10 0.011 - 0.086 0.046 Erosion from Yes natural deposits % of positive samples % 0 5% 0.0% Naturally for Total Coliform per month None present in Yes Bacteria the environment Microbial Parameters (Measured in Edmonds Distribution System) % of positive samples % 0 5% 0.0% Naturally for Total Coliform per month None present in Yes Bacteria the environment Turbidity, inorganics, and Microbial Contaminants Turbidity I NTU I N/A TT 1 100% 1 0.11 Soil Erosion Yes Turbidity is a measure of the amount of particulates in water measured in Nephelometric Turbidity Units (NTU). Particulates in water can include bacteria, viruses and protozoans that can cause disease. Turbidity measurements are used to determine the effectiveness of the treatment processes used to remove these particulates. Values reported are the lowest monthly percentage of samples that met the EPA turbidity limit and the highest single filtered water turbidity measurement obtained during the year. In 2014, no filtered water turbidity results were above the EPA 0.3 NTU limit so the lowest percentage was 100%. MCL = Maximum Contaminant Level: The highest level of a contaminant that is allowed in drinking water. MCLs are set as close to the MCLGs as feasible using the best available treatment technology. MCLG = Maximum Contaminant Level Goal: The level of a contaminant in drinking water below which there is no known or expected risk to health. MCLGs allow for a margin of safety. NTU = Nephelometric Turbidity Unit: The unit of measurement for turbidity. Detected Unregulated Contaminants TT = Treatment Technique: A required process intended to reduce the level of a contaminant in drinking water. The turbidity MCL that applies to the Tolt water supply is 5 NTU. AL = Action Level: The concentration of a contaminant which, if exceeded, triggers treatment or other requirements which a water system must follow (for lead and copper monitoring results). N/A - Not Applicable (EPA has not established these goals). ND - Not Detected. NR - Not Regulated (these substances are not regulated by EPA). ppm = Parts per Million: (One part of a particular contaminant is present for every million parts of water). ppb = Parts per Billion: (One part of a particular contaminant is present for every billion parts of water). Conversions: 1 part per million (ppm) =1 mg/L 1 ppm =1000 ppb 1 part per billion (ppb) =1 ug/L 1 mg/L =1000 ug/L Parameter Units Ideal Level/Goal Edmonds Water Typical Sources (MCLG) Range Average Bromodichloromethane',' ppb 0 1.5 - 2.6 1.9 Disinfection by product from chlorine Chloroform trichloromethane 1z ppb 300 21.8 - 54.1 40.2 Total Trihalamethanes (TTHM)' ppb See Note 3 16.4 - 58.1 44.2 Dichloroacetic Acid',' ppb 0 3.2 -14.3 8.1 Trichloroacetic Acid' 1 ppb 1 300 117.5 - 22.91 20.9 Haloacetic Acids HAA5' I ppb I See Note 4 124.8 - 37.31 29 'These substances are disinfection by-products which must be monitored to determine compliance with the USEPA Stage 1 and Stage 2 Disinfectants/Disinfection By-products Rules (Stage 2 D/DBPR). 2 Includes results for 16 study sites and four additional sites that are monitored for compliance with current regulations. The study sites were monitored during October and December 2007 as part of a required study to identify new distribution system monitoring sites. This study known as the initial distribution system evaluation, or IDSE, and will continue through August 2008. The IDSE is required by the Stage 2 D/DBPR regulations. 'The MCL for TTHM is 80 ppb. 'The MCL for HAA5 is 60 ppb. Voluntary Information Parameter Everett Water Results Units Range Detected Average Value Alkalinity' ppm 12.8 - 21.6 16.6 Aluminum' ppm 0.01 -0.09 0.02 Arsenic' ppb < 0.1 - 0.3 0.2 Calcium Hardness' ppm' 7.4 -12.4 9.2 pH' S.u. 7.5 - 9.1 7.9 Sodium' ppm 5.5 - 6.7 6.0 Total Hardness' ppm' 9.9 -14.8 12.0 'Results are from samples collected from 26 locations in Everett's distribution system 'Arsenic and Sodium were monitored at the treatment plant effluent. 'Hardness and alkalinity units are in ppm as CaCO3 (calcium carbonate equivalent units). Cryptosporidium Cryptosporidium is a one -celled intestinal parasite that if ingested may cause diarrhea, fever, and other gastrointestinal distress. It can be found in all of Washington's rivers, streams, and lakes and comes from animal or human wastes deposited in the watershed. Cryptosporidium is resistant to chlorine, but is removed by effective filtration and sedimentation treatment such as that used by Everett. It can also be inactivated by certain types of alternate disinfection processes such as ozonation and UV light contactors. Past monitoring results suggest that Cryptosporidium is present in Everett's source only occasionally and atvery low concentrations. In 2014, Everett collected monthly Cryptosporidium oocyst samples from the source water at the plant intakes. None were detected. Some people may be more vulnerable to contaminants in drinking water than the general population. Immuno-compromised persons such as persons with cancer undergoing chemotherapy, persons who have undergone organ transplants, people with HIV/AIDS or other immune system disorders, some elderly, and infants can be particularly at risk from infections. These people should seek advice about drinking water from their health care providers. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) / Center for Disease Control (CDC) guidelines on appropriate means to lessen the risk of infection by Cryptosporidium and other microbial contaminants are available from the Safe Drinking Water Hotline by calling 1.800-426.4791. Information from the EPA To ensure tap water is safe to drink, EPA adopts regulations setting water quality standards for public water systems. The Federal Food and Drug Administration regulates contaminants in bottled water and is responsible for providing the same level of public health protection. Drinking water, including bottled water, may reasonably be expected to contain at least small amounts of some contaminants. The presence of contaminants does not necessarily indicate that water poses a health risk. More information about contaminants and potential health effects can be obtained by calling the Environmental Protection Agency's Safe Drinking Water Hotline (1.800-426-4791). 2014 Annual Water Use Efficiency Summary The Edmonds water system is fully metered. The State require: water suppliers maintain their Distribution System Leakage (DSL) percent or less. The State also recognizes that a certain amount of le is expected and unavoidable. Total water purchased 1,064,929,096 gallons Total authorized & qualified uses 977,983,820 gallons Distribution System Leakage (DSL) 86,945,276 gallons DSL percentage of total water 8.2% 3 year annual average 8.7% *DSL refers to all the water that could not be accounted for, and can be attr to water main breaks, small ongoing leaks, meter inaccuracies, and water For further information see our website at http://edmondswa.go% USEPA Required Lead Statement The USEPA drinking water regulations require this statement be include' the lead and copper sampling results regardless of the levels observed: If pr, elevated levels of lead can cause serious health problems, especial pregnant women and young children. Lead in drinking water is prir from materials and components associated with service line and plumbing. The city of Edmonds Utilities Division is responsib providing high quality drinking water, but cannot control the v of materials used in plumbing components. When your water has sitting for several hours, you can minimize the potential for lead exp by flushing your tap for 30 seconds to two minutes before using for drinking or cooking. If you are concerned about lead in your you may wish to have your water tested. Information on lead in dri: water, testing methods and steps you can take to minimize your exp is available from the safe Drinking Water Hotline or at http://w v% gov/safewater/lead. Lead , Copper, and pH tit T CD N O c cc c m rn d IL ra N 3 d as v c Q' r o� N, am a M cc a E' rn L EPA Regulations Everett Water Resu j Ideal Action Parameter Major source Units 90th Homes Level/Goal Level % Exceeding Ci N (MCLG) (AL) Level the AL t4 = Copper Plumbing, erosion of ppm 1.3 1.3 0.109 None C natural deposits E Lead Plumbing, erosion of ppb 0 15 2 0 of 107 � .. natural deposits (00%) USEPA and state regulations require systems to monitor for the presence of lead and copper E three years. Everett and many of the systems it supplies conduct lead and copper monitoring d their combined service area as a regional group. The above data was collected in 2012. The r E round of required regional tap sampling will be conducted in the summer of 2015. The 90th°/ S is the highest result obtained in 90 percent of the samples collected when the results are ranl V in order from lowest to highest. In the past, the results for water tested before it enters hous( plumbing were even lower the the tap results. This indicates that there is virtually no lead or i ram+ in the water, but household plumbing may contribute to the presence of lead and copper at ff Q Soda ash is added Daily Avg Min Daily Avg Minimum PH to reduce water s u Avg corrosivity by increasing 7 6 7.4 7.6 7.4 PH and alkalinity The Washington State Dept. of Health requires Everett to oper program at or above a minimum daily average pH of 7.4. The packet Pg. 362 for more than nine days every six months. In 2013, the averag 8.A.a C N t v APPENDIX K Packet Pg. 363 8.A.a E a� THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK L .N C d L L Q E O U r O N O C O O C N N d L Q. Q Packet Pg. 364 8.A.a CITY OF EDMONDS COLIFORM MONITORING PLAN � °F ED,y 0 Page l Packet Pg. 365 8.A.a TABLE OF CONTENTS COLIFORM MONITORING SUMMARY (IF SAMPLE TESTS POSITIVE) pg.4 General Information 4 Summary 4 Coliform Present 4 Coliform and E. coli Present 5 CITY OF EDMONDS WATER SYSTEM OVERVIEW 6 REVISED TOTAL COLIFORM RULE 7 General Information 7 BACTERIA 7 Coliform Bacteria 7 Total Coliform, Fecal Coliform, and E. coli 8 Unsatisfactory Coliform Sample Result 8 SAMPLES 8 Sampling Requirements 8 Source and Reservoir Samples 8 Selecting Sample Sites 8 E. COLI PRESENT ROUTINE AND REPEAT SAMPLES 9 Responding to an E. coli-present Sample Result 9 E. coli Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) 9 Collection of Repeat Samples 10 PUBLIC NOTIFICATION TIER 1, TIER 2, TIER 3 10 Public Notification Requirements 10 E. coli MCL violation — Issued within 24 hours (Tier 1) 10 Treatment technique violation — Issued within 30 days (Tier 2) 10 Monitoring violation — Issued within one year (Tier 3) to Reporting violation — Issued within one year (Tier 3) 10 TREATMENT TECHNIQUE TRIGGER AND ASSESSMENTS, LEVEL 1 & 2 Treatment Technique Trigger 11 Level 1 Assessment 11 Level 2 Assessment 11 Three parts of an assessment include 1 ' Page 2 Packet Pg. 366 8.A.a Investigation 12 Discussion 12 Corrective action 12 Sanitary Defect 12 Defects 12 PUMP STATION LOCATION 13 RESERVOIR LOCATIONS 13 PRESSURE REDUCING VALVE (PRV) LOCATIONS 13 SAMPLE STAND LOCATIONS 14 REPEAT SAMPLE LOCATIONS 15 KEY CONTACTS 16,17 City of Edmonds 16 Water Utilities 16 Department of Health 16 Hospitals 16 Public School 17 Private School 17 Media 17 APPENDICES Appendix A Sample Site Map Appendix B Bacteriological Sampling Procedure Appendix C Media Notification Appendix D Boil Water Notice Appendix E Revised Total Coliform Rule Level I & 2 Assessment Page 3 Packet Pg. 367 8.A.a COLIFORM MONITORING SUMMARY (IF SAMPLE TESTS POSITIVE) General Information Edmonds water system identification number is: 2250OU Address: 7110 210'h St. S.W., Edmonds, WA, 98026 Phone: 425-771-0235 Emergency: 425-309-9867 Monthly samples required: 30 Monthly samples taken to represent the distribution system: 35 Laboratory name: Everett Environmental Laboratory Laboratory Phone: 425-257-8230 Summary Take 35 routine Coliform Bacteria water samples per month. Routine sample results should show "Satisfactory" from the lab. If so, then no additional testing is needed. Coliform Present If laboratory calls and says the sample has "Total Coliform Present" but is waiting to see if sample has E. coli present then: 1. Notify Water Lead, Water Manager, Public Works Director, DOH 2. FLUSH and "Find and Fix" source of contamination. 3. Take 3 repeat samples, (one from the same tap, one within 5 connections upstream, one within 5 connections downstream) (see pg. 10, 15 ) If sample shows "Unsatisfactory, Total Coliform Present" then: 1. Notify Water Lead, Water Manager, Public Works Director, DOH 2. FLUSH and "Find and Fix" source of contamination. 3. Take 3 repeat samples, (one from the same tap, one within 5 connections upstream, one within 5 connections downstream) (see pg.10, 15 ) If all repeat samples test "Satisfactory", negative for total Coliform, then no further samples are needed. If 2 or more "Total Coliform Present" results in the same month: Page 4 Packet Pg. 368 8.A.a Conduct an Assessment: (Treatment Technique Trigger) Level 1: A water system evaluation done by a knowledgeable operator to "Find and Fix" the contamination source. (see pg.11) Level 2 (instead of Level 1): If a second Level 1 Treatment Technique Trigger happens within a 12 month rolling period. A water system evaluation done by a Water Distribution Manager 2 (WDM2) or higher, an Engineer, or Health staff, to "Find and Fix" the contamination source. (see pg. 11) Coliform and E. coli Present If routine sample or repeat sample shows "Unsatisfactory, Total Coliform Present" and "E. coli present" then: 1. Notify Water Lead, Water Manager, Public Works Director, DOH 2. FLUSH and "Find and Fix" source of contamination. 3. Take 3 repeat samples, (one from the same tap, one within 5 connections upstream, one within 5 connections downstream) (see pg. 10, 15 ) 4. Conduct an Assessment: (Treatment Technique Trigger) Level 2 (instead of Level 1): A water system evaluation done by a Water Distribution Manager 2 (WDM2.) or higher, an Engineer, or Health staff, to "Find and Fix" the contamination source. (see pg. 11) 5. Public Notification, within 24 hours if 2 related samples test positive for total coliform bacteria and there is E. coli bacteria in one or more of the samples. (see pg. 10) If sample shows "Unsatisfactory, Total Coliform Present" and "E. coli absent" then: Notify Water Lead, Water Manager, Public Works Director FLUSH and "Find and Fix" source of contamination. Take 3 repeat samples, (one from the same tap, one within 5 connections upstream, one within 5 connections downstream) (see pg. 10, 15 ) Repeat until sample tests "Satisfactory" Page 5 Packet Pg. 369 8.A.a CyY679112041]uI$]►1IMLIA►►04r0li IVIR1rFluKIIIAO1:IIIAIWO City of Edmonds (COE) buys its water from Alderwood Water District. COE's service area is approximately 7.7 square miles and includes a population of approximately 30,354 with approximately 10,229 service connections. The service area is located in Southern Snohomish County. The surrounding purveyors include the City of Lynnwood, City of Mountlake Terrace, and Olympic View Water District. The City of Edmonds has interties with Lynnwood, Olympic View Water District and Seattle Public Utilities for use in emergency situations only. COE has four reservoirs with a total volume of 7.5 MG in the direct service area to provide equalizing storage and fire flows. COE has 36 sample stands for routine coliform compliance monitoring. Sample stands are used to overcome the problems of gaining daily access to public and private premises for water quality sampling. These stands are located to represent different population concentrations, sources of supply, pressure zones and storage facilities so that representative water samples can be collected. COE's distribution system is comprised of over 139 miles of water supply and distribution mains, nearly 1,086 hydrants and 22 pressure reducing stations. 'age 0 Packet Pg. 370 8.A.a REVISED TOTAL COLIFORM RULE General Information On April 1, 2016, the federal Revised Total Coliform Rule (RTCR) replaced the 1989 Total Coliform Rule (TCR). The Revised Total Coliform Rule requires systems vulnerable to contamination to "find and fix" problems and pathways that could allow pathogens to enter the distribution system. Routine coliform samples are to be collected from representative points in the distribution system at regular time intervals. Public water systems are required to deliver safe and reliable drinking water to their customers 24 hours a day, 365 days a year. If the water supply becomes contaminated, consumers can become seriously ill. Fortunately, public water systems take many steps to ensure that the public has safe, reliable drinking water. One of the most important steps is to regularly test the water for coliform bacteria. This coliform monitoring plan will enable water operators to use laboratory and economical tests to evaluate the microbial water quality of the water system. These tests help ensure the water provided to customers is free of disease -causing organisms. BACTERIA Coliform Bacteria Coliform bacteria are organisms that are present in the environment and in the feces of all warm-blooded animals and humans. Coliform bacteria will not likely cause illness. However, their presence in drinking water indicates that disease -causing organisms (pathogens) could be in the water system. Most pathogens that can contaminate water supplies come from the feces of humans or animals. Testing drinking water for all possible pathogens is complex, time-consuming, and expensive. It is relatively easy and inexpensive to test for coliform bacteria. If coliform bacteria are found in a water sample, water system operators work to find the source of contamination and restore safe drinking water. There are three different groups of coliform bacteria; each has a different level of risk. The three groups are; total coliform, fecal coliform and E. coli. Page 7 Packet Pg. 371 8.A.a Total Coliform, Fecal Coliform, and E. coli Total coliform, fecal coliform, and E. coli are all indicators of drinking water quality. The total coliform group is a large collection of different kinds of bacteria. Fecal coliforms are types of total coliform that mostly exist in feces. E. coli is a sub -group of fecal coliform. When a water sample is sent to a lab, it is tested for total coliform. If total coliform is present, the sample will also be tested for either fecal conform or E. coli, depending on the lab testing method. Unsatisfactory Coliform Sample Result Water systems are required to submit a water system assessment report to the Department of Health any time there is an unsatisfactory coliform sample result. GlMu I-MV, Sampling Requirements Population, reported on the Water Facilities Inventory (WFI) form, determines how many samples are taken per month. Edmonds has a population of 30,354, as of 2014. Population from 25,001 — 33,000 requires a minimum of 30 routine coliform samples per month. Source and Reservoir Samples The Department of health recommends collecting samples from the source and the storage reservoirs on a regular basis. Be sure to mark these samples as "investigative", they don't count as compliance samples. Selectine Sample Sites When selecting sample sites, using a customer tap as a sample site may not accurately reflect conditions in the distribution system. During routine and repeat sampling it may be determined that a site no longer represents the conditions within the distribution system, simply remove this site from the Plan and replace it with a site that better represents the conditions within the distribution system. Sample sites to avoid: Page 8 Packet Pg. 372 8.A.a Swivel faucets Hot/Cold mixing faucets, (faucets with a single lever) Drinking fountains Janitorial sinks Frost -free hose bibs Leaking or spraying faucets Faucets below ground or near ground level Faucets served by home filters or other home treatment systems Fire hydrants E. COLI PRESENT ROUTINE AND REPEAT SAMPLES Responding to an E. coli-present Sample Result The presence of E. coli bacteria in the distribution system will create significant challenges for us and our customers. We may be required or choose to advise our customers to boil their drinking water or use bottled water. Our customers may not be able to drink their tap water while we investigate the problem or pursue corrective action. The Revised Total Conform Rule requires immediate public notification (within 24 hours) when two related samples (a routine and one or more of its corresponding repeat samples) test positive for total coliform bacteria, and there is E. coli bacteria in one or more of the samples. The lab analyzes all unsatisfactory samples collected from the distribution system for the presence of E. coli bacteria. E. coli Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) '[be RTCR calls the acute Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) an "E.coli MCL". An E.coli MCL violation can occur four ways: 1. A total coliform-present repeat sample follows an E. coli-present routine sample. 2. An E. coli-present routine sample follows a total coliform-present routine sample. 3. The lab fails to test a total coliform-present repeat sample for E.coli. 4. A system fails to take 3 repeat samples following an E. coli-present routine sample. Page 4 Packet Pg. 373 8.A.a Collection of Repeat Samples The Revised Total Coliform Rule requires the collection of repeat samples within 24 hours when a routine distribution system sample is unsatisfactory. 3 repeat samples must be taken for each unsatisfactory routine sample. • One from the same tap as the original unsatisfactory routine sample. • One from an active service within five active connections upstream from the original routine sample. • One from an active service within five active connections downstream from the original unsatisfactory sample location. Or may use alternative sampling locations in lieu of the requirement to collect at least one repeat sample upstream and one downstream of the original sampling site. Repeat monitoring locations that are believed to be representative of a pathway for contamination into the distribution system may be used. PUBLIC NOTIFICATION TIER 1, TIER 2, TIER 3 Public Notification Requirements E. coli MCL violation — Issued within 24 hours (Tier 1) Routine total colifonn — positive; repeat E. coli — positive. Routine E. coli — positive; repeat total coliform — positive. Routine E. coli — positive; system fails to take all repeat samples. Repeat total coliform — positive; sample not tested for E. coli. Treatment technique violation — Issued within 30 days (Tier 2) System fails to conduct a required assessment within 30 days of the treatment technique trigger. System fails to correct a sanitary defect within required timeframe. Monitorinsi violation — Issued within one year (Tier 3) System fails to collect all required routine samples. Routine total coliform — positive; sample not tested for E. coli. Reportine violation — Issued within one year (Tier 3) System fails to submit a monitoring report or completed assessment form in a timely E I IFi1111N M Page 10 Packet Pg. 374 8.A.a System fails to notify DOH of an E. coli — positive sample in a timely manner. TREATMENT TECHNIQUE TRIGGER AND ASSESSMENTS, LEVEL 1 & 2 Treatment Technique Trigger A treatment technique trigger is a situation that requires a water system to take action. RTCR requires water systems to conduct an assessment to "find and fix" any sanitary defects whenever a treatment technique trigger occurs. There are two assessment levels. Both evaluate the entire system from the sample collection point to the source of supply. We should anticipate that a treatment technique trigger might occur any time you collect routine and repeat samples. Therefore we should be ready to start a system evaluation as soon as the lab notifies us of total coliform-present. Level 1 Assessment A basic water system evaluation can be done by an owner, certified operator, or a knowledgeable person. A level 1 treatment technique trigger occurs any time a water system: • Collects fewer than 40 routine samples a month and has 2 or more total coliform-present results the same month. Collects 40 or more routine samples a month and has total coliform- present results in more than 5 percent of its routine and repeat samples. ■ Fails to collect 3 repeats for every total tali -form -present routine sample. Level 2 Assessment A complex evaluation that only a person with state -required qualifications, such as an engineer, certified operator (WDM2 or higher), or state of local health staff can do, A level 2 treatment technique trigger occurs when a water system has; ■ An E. coli MCL violation Page I I Packet Pg. 375 8.A.a • A second Level 1 treatment technique trigger within a rolling 12 month period. Three parts of an assessment include: Investigation: Identify any defects that allow coliform to enter the distribution system. Discussion. Evaluate what you identified during the assessment that might have allowed the contamination to occur and the corrective action needed to fix it. Corrective action: Record the steps you took or will take to fix the sanitary defect that allowed the contamination to occur. When correcting contamination problems The Department of Health uses two terms that should be defined, "sanitary defects" and "defects". Sanitary Defect: is a pathway for contaminants to enter the water system. This may be as simple as a missing reservoir vent screen or a poorly sealed hatch, or as substantial as a failing reservoir. Corrective action for a sanitary defect could be as simple as installing a new screen on a reservoir vent or replacing the seal on a hatch, or as substantial as building a IIMIAMMT4IYUTA Defects: are issues Identified during an assessment that could have caused positive coliform samples such as an improper sampling technique such as rinsing out a mottle before collecting a sample. Corrective action for a defect might be as simple as training on correct sampling techniques for the person who collects water samples. Page 12 Packet Pg. 376 8.A.a PUMP STATION LOCATION LOCATION Five Corners Pump Station 84 th & Bowdoin Way RESERVOIR LOCATIONS Tank # (size) Address Inspected Cleaning Five Corners 1.5 mg 84` & Bowdoin Way Weekly Five Years Five Corners 3.0 mg 84 & Bowdoin Way Weekly Five Years Yost Park 1.5 mg 9601 Bowdoin Way Weekly Five Years Seaview 1.5 mg 185{ & 90" Ave Weekly Five Years PRESSURE REDUCING VALVE (PRV) LOCATIONS PRV STATION NO. LOCATION MAIN SIZE 1 72° W & No Meadowdale 4 2 68 & No Meadowdale 4 3 7082 Meadowdale Bch Rd 6 4 741& Meadowdale Bch Rd 4 5 Braemar Dr & 76th 6 6 176' & 76th 6 7 188t & 76th 6 8 80& 184 St 8 9 84" & 184 St 4 10 88` & 185 St 6 11 8900 & 188th 6 12 89t & 192n St SW 4 6 13 121& Main St 14 Olympic & Main St 6 15 91& Pine St 4 16 Alderwood Water meter vault 12 17 198 & 99 4 Page 13 Packet Pg. 377 8.A.a SAMPLE STAND LOCATIONS Sample Stand # Location Sample Stand # Location 101 7707 203' St SW 201 242" & 78 PI W 102 7421 215` St. SW 202 7909 239 St SW 103 $14 7S Ave W 22 203 415 7` Ave No 104 7713 234h St SW 204 8'h & Caspers St 105 CL2 Shack 1 faucet 205 1412 Olympic Ave 106 740 Elm St 206 1045 Daley St 107 "A" Ave & Pine St 207 401 12t Ave No 108 539 3` Ave So 208 20709 Maplewood Drive 109 220 Railroad Ave 209 20408 86` PI W 110 725 7` Ave No 210 21626 88` Ave W 111 1429 10` PI No 211 20924 81" PI W 112 8500 186` St SW 212 19921 81" PI W 113 8302 Talbot Rd 213 8329 Sierra Drive 114 18301 76 Ave W 214 19128 92° Ave W 115 17812 72" Ave W 215 18119 Andover St 116 6900 Meadowdale Bch Rd 216 7506 180" St SW 117 16510 72 nd Ave W 217 6801 No Meadowdale Rd 118 16340 75 PI W 218 6631 172 nd St SW c a L a� a� .N c a� E 0 U r O N 0 c 0 M c aD a� a r N 3 a� a� Q 0 N a� c c a E aD r L 0 E W E :.i Q Page ] 4 Packet Pg. 378 8.A.a C b 33 3333 333 3 ,° 0' 0 ¢ ¢ N N ++ N o0 ¢ 7, ^� � 00 C)y -,r � Q oa c1: r-C7 -� 00 C 01 00 [n n �o O N 00 N O Q M N Q oo N N N M C m A 00 1p 0a C7 N N Q 00 [� n N n .- .� M o0 oa oo N oa oo O0 Oo .-• .- .� .. as 7 ++ , V] ++ N 00 ¢' '' ¢ �,o IC — - C C N N et N r*3 N /+ tG ❑ _ N 00 •-+ N 00 00 00 O1 ¢ DO -. "o -- [� -� a p C> r- C 00 �C V f VZ I= CO C N C7 M O Q (D r- N a, .- o a o+ - Oti ON r- 00 tn 00 Ln 00WNr- tn kn. N.NI=N4 - moo• nan a -- N do n oa C� p r. N M I- V7 %G n 00 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C 4o «� 3 33 � 33�3 3 3 ;3 ¢ >C'nCh ¢ 1) > zz�xQ¢�Q� LL. >m n C4 7 ¢ 0] 4) D - CC N +�+ r�V't kn �.o ¢ ¢s Coo W) vst- �oN Ln rq CD %10 O N N O, M M N T Q+ n C -- all kn Q N z N �lG M N M C] C7 M \o 11 00 00 [- to �o AC- C- N N — •.• r- M 10 -- 00 00 -� -- - • - p 333 .O Q aCn v) a CA o O w C)m CA Ln 0 v 3 ¢ M o V7 �NM 00 o ¢ ¢ Q C00�nn �o N N nn in N N N N CC o0 Q N ono O C) C' Ln C r- kn N N rr7 n p M C-- Q W) N � C] C N N `o � VZ mw oakn r- It - "=CoCN�nwNwr- CC p�C r- r- r- r� C, • • C+ ki?) N 00 00 -- -� -� a NM ��n0oC7%C) NM�N�noO c R a E a� N A L Cu .N C d t i E 0 U ti r O N O C O R C O N m a Packet Pg. 379 8.A.a KEY CONTACTS City of Edmonds Phil Williams (Director of Public Works) 425-771-0235 Ext. 1634 Cell 425-582-3058 Jim Waite (Water / Sewer Manager) 425-771-0235 Ext. 1649 Cell 425-870-0617 Kris Kuhnhausen (Water Lead) 425-771-0235 Ext. 1647 Cell 425-231-0324 Jeff Kobylk ( Water Quality Technician) 425-771-0235 Ext. 1644 Cell 425-563-31 W Water Utilities Alderwood Water/Sewer District 425-743-4605 Olympic View Water /Sewer District 425-774-7769 City of Everett 425-257-8878 Lynn Kirby (Water Quality Engineer) 206-684-0216 ❑enartment of Health Northwest Region (Kent) 253-395-6750 DOH. after hour Hotline 877-481-4901 Ingrid Salmon (Coliform Program) 253-395-6775 Carol Stuckey (Coliform Program) 253-395-6775 Jim Nilson (Regional Engineer) 253-395-6764 Hospitals Swedish Edmonds Hospital 425-640-4190 Page 16 Packet Pg. 380 8.A.a Public School Districts Edmonds School District 15 425-670-7244 Private Schools Edmonds Holly Rosary 425-778-3197 Laboratories Everett Environmental Laboratory 425-257-8230 SPU Water Quality Laboratory 206-684-7404 SPU Water Quality Chemistry (Brian Hoyt) 206-386-1102 AM Test (Redmond) 425-885-1664 Media Contacts Newspaper Contacts The Everett Herald 425-339-3089 The Seattle Times 206-652-6290 Seattle Post- Intel Iigencer 206-464-2994 Television Contacts KING TV (Channel 5) 206-448-5555 KSTW TV (Channel 11) 206-572-5789 KIRO TV (Channel 7) 206-728-7777 KOMO TV (Channel 4) 206-443-4000 Radio Contacts KIRO (AM 710) 425-728-5450 KOMO (AM 1000) 425-443-4010 Page I7 Packet Pg. 381 8.A.a E a� THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK L .N C d L L Q O U r O N O C O O C N N d L Q. Q Packet Pg. 382 8.A.a /_1» =1 61 Q /:I_1 Packet Pg. 383 8.A.a E a� THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK L .N C d L L Q E O U r O N O C O O C N N d L Q. Q Packet Pg. 384 8.A.a 1S77H ST W 1 3 3 'fit I 1 City• . • • ' 1SSTH ST SW j I Q r 15 H p( I s� H 160T TSW x � e 3 N� I £ a I u �^ D(Lo9t m 'srw5w 118 \\ FPO f 62ND PLSW I 1/t RO I �63R[ I nL SW 3 — 164TH ST SW_ L 164TH PL SW > 217x > 6STH PLSWL- \= 11-7-- MEP I� 3 � Q -$ERTO(q�gs !jo^� 168TH ST SW� - ` 3 � 169r}I 69THP MEADOWDALE MS�/ -- ts a ST sw Z x 218 172ND S75W - 1i1'3 `0W"� 173RDS 5W 3 BFq 172�D PL STL s h 3AO SF TALBOT RD '% GS Pi. BRARF ¢ qO 116 L M 174TH ST$W FREDERICK PL �_3.75TH ST SW THOMAS m MOORE 3 SCHOOLS' ^ G 176TH ST SW x 3 C �yiFk I79HPLSW e J 3 3 179TH PL S Snohomis ��� p H ST SW k n a PLSW. L o 179TX PL � S county P 1io s A S 115 3 A = r 7 178TH PL SW n Qi Q (� o — 180THPL5 a 216 215 P I $ 5 nWv 70, 181STST L.w, 3 > 1ST PL5 182NOQ 2ND $ 1 P 5 0)8'La°PLSW 3 y p r 1 1 ;4 182ND P IS 2ND SF 56 +' x zo Q 3p0 q ¢ y ,[J(-�WA �+ 183RD STO O 188 7 ST SW £ POST ` r 3 W OFFICE , I S� 0 Q %83RD PL ¢ 0 ^ 1g ^ 3 •C & 18ITH PL Jg 112 ry 5TH 185TH PL `I Srs m 3 >a 3 y 186TH PL SW 1867H 5T S 3 as 3 m Q a i 187TX PL SW Q a x e y'h 7TH S7 SW x qF 7TH ST S I o e e Q (/ 3 m 187TH LSW p N 168TH ST $W d7H S75W � q O'r9p _a�• 3 a q 3 5 w 3^ 187TH PL SW L E 4i o > > > I88TH PL SW (� 0 42pJ� z 189THPLSW s= 3 _ F 4 PENNY 9 U ,WATER $ �`% BIAKE P S� 3 Q y ¢ 0 189TH PLy� 9G m 189TH PI. SW ? ~ P gpTY. 91ST PL SW a 0 LVNNDALE r ti' CHERRY ST z9 a m u O �i0< 214 m 191sr P`,SH S ELEMENTARYQ 190TH ST SW 3 190TH STS N I915T G M 192ND ST SW n 191ST PL SW F 1915T ST SW O MERr 2 3 n < y SI O,P 192ND PL SW 192ND ST S� r- NORT > Qom' 192ND PL SW 192ND PL SW DR/ HSTR``4M LN N. ^�fL > C � 193RD PL SW �+ 213 193RD PL SW 3 Q 193RD p O �W00O S cva m I m ie a 3 j Q L SW 193RD ST SW +' OR/ 72 G s .0 194TH Sw 194TH PL5 x 3 '�N01110� ,9 d N 94TH PL SW v c o 3 n U ET on vE x LL 5.24 $, SVV 7 91 z 195TH S7 S 1 6TH ST SW� ~ fn PUGET WA 205 p 196TH PLSW W MELODY W o0 111TH 6T SW 6L. x 3 3I 197rH sr SW d & INDLEY LN ti lewood 3 m aTH w n 3 PL 1 d C B R VIEW D WAY aC 3 ry G 3 I HE1N c° ROOKMERE ST D. Z 198 HST sw3 $ yAr m $ 199TH ST SW 3 198TH PL SW t� 204 In TA WA� oor sr s VIEW�(i zoorH sr svZ�1.2 ■ MOOR Pl LTNER LN EDMONDS Q STA PL z �2 sn.ER LN > ADE LN VISTAS IIN S�w 3 3 2015T ST SW ALOn COMMUNITY` � 3 4, HA WAY ¢ 2015T PL < j • COLLEGE 1 •a J 2 LOHA ST x c ¢ > P F > r 202ND S75W x ¢ x •i rvP 2i RD WA 11`0� l u SIERRA PL z 2NDPL5w3 w 3 0 C 202ND ST SW 202ND PL SW _ a a o > < a$ 101 a `'1J2F0 >■ Q GLE S7 z (QV O x m 03RD PCi4�— �16 it NO w DALE Y ST ¢ :V 206 O DALeLg ¢ N W 1 $T 5 A / T ¢ > 207 J 2MTF1 ry.S 2 S�OLLEGE B(( x FIRE Q SPRA UE ST "' ¢ 209 3 !2 THPLSW STATION Humml Ir I g zosTH vlsw 3 3 PLACE Q1 O EDM NDS Sr y F W ELEMENTARY Q a4 CITY I4' B LL ST i Park w p m O6TH sw i■ U , COUNTY O [1 'q HALL Sp PUBLIC .> 208 `a� ■.,■ 7 COURT �C+, 109 MAST E y~ SAFETY FRANCIS i 7TH PLsw 002077HS 3 .• a� Q■ COLLEGE O p h ANDERSON MA ST PLACE MS N �7 _ .-. J' S 207rHPLSW DAYTON ST '1I� is DAY i + CENTNR WADE AMES x 3 No ST F 2C rp.A '^ Q THEATRE ¢ p 209TH PLS H' 0 09TH 3 WWTP u, � MAP EST Yost d �� ¢ Memorial 31P x ALD ST m ! > g 2 1TX >+ - j > 203 T05 Park �v g$w 3 x 10THST5 0 _ SAS > WAL T 5T R z r i v z ` m OLLTDR v, i�}1R Sf �WLl::iz s � SNfk fY �� I � > a m � � e ` OWELLWAV W MAGNOL LN CED/ !PL ` O RD q 71ZT I_ UNION Q h $PRUCEST \ z O N $ EDMONDS Ed ` D� 1U8 v, OMELANODR ; 3 H J 3 3 f(( 2137HSTSW WOODWAYH 99 N CO ¢ SPR E PL S j LAUREL L > o'. Do W /'( ,S 213T L SW �p > HEMLOCK x ¢ O e �' 4y Q K HEMLOCK ST = 224TH PL SW nI /"Wqy 214THP U102 Be Park < EN R = LAUREL ST m m 3 215TH ST SW I Q PINE ST qQ EAMONr LN 107 5TH PL S N ST yqJ m > STEVENS 3 ti >_ --- PINE ST 21'rt c a 215TH PL SW 3 , HOSPITAL d v, ) Pp1Nt EDWAR 3 PL o a 21sTH PL SW 216TH ST SW 6 , > 216TH ST 5 C x FORSYTH LN Q Q j 3 217TH S7 SIN 3 CHASE r f 3 a c z v Q 00 u > 210 LAKE c $ n Q HospgA ° p 'P x FIR ¢ ISTH SCHOOL n 2187X ST SW .+ o FIR 57 i ELAI Q ¢ q 3 3 3 218TH ST O - BEIlA COO RD ¢ 11 I_ HELM —Y rO E s SEA 219TH SW II i p i i 219TH Sr SW ~ 1~ z n n g112 220TH ST S m 22 H ST SW B PL 3 M ELM 9 ---__— — —_—_ 13 - WN SP1. 106 II� 5W T c ---- -3�-- ---� 1.4 w 4 5 215T PL SW BIRCH PL i o4 N I 1ST 22157 PL x • 2215T PL 5 ++ WESTGATE / \ ^ >� BIRCH $ ELEMENTARY 22ND ase I 3 3 ° J 2 RD ST SW d e Lake 222ND ST SW Q J.yl a Q 222N p P o Esperance p LSHAN 0 BIRCH' 3 3 3 _I 3 Lake Park ozz3P r3ZZ3 SW > 13TH WAVSW 14TH ST SW Q Q G y j� q�L w API SH Park u 1D 8 WAY 5w ¢ — 224TH ST SW e 3 N z ai r 224TH ST SW p SI m O �I I I 24TH PLSW 6 3Q pLGONOUIN RO 226TH ST SW S ^z�^� 3 5TH PL SW i 225TH ST SW � ? � 25TH PL SV ST SW _.III e 0 3 w > ^ 226T 3I 26TH PLS i 226TH ST SW > 0 �' S 3 an 2 7THP III m ax 27THIsW r�z i— 3 u -_ 0 .��� T 3 (Nf TH ST 121T1�STSW — v,LOTHP F P 226TH PLSW 3 3 = 2z PL sw y zzarH sr s — �P NpEER DR 2zgTH PL SW Q c o g6'TN PI u < i > 229TH ST > 1 U3 228iH ST p� Deer Park ■ 2 •'+ x r_ F / zzyrWsrs 3 SYO Reserve SD1,01% SHERWOOD o 104 m 229THPLSW / rsi ELEMENTARY 3 230TH ST SW 3 230TH STSW 9rNPL SH 3 ?9 S0 3 231ST ST SW 23151 SW o01O 3 W zllsc Q 2 1 'IVN �rrc 1 232ND ST5 i J r 232ND ST SW S 232ND PL SW `Y'�---- 3 WACHUSETTRD m FRIARY ?O SCRIBER $� m \ ro 3¢J� 3f Ly i f 232ND ST! LAKES 234TH PI-MAKE,233RD Sr 5 I I a y 232ND PL SW 2 DPLS i Q 3RD pL x I m = CL 2 • , 234 I ST SW a 3 I -�- 234T SW I MADRONA LN 235TH PL $ eY� a j 235TH SIA 236TX PL SW L D N O Water Sample Sites 15 Q 0 236THSTSW 36TH ST SW ,C1. z 3 1 L x .a m� a (> 1 Edmonds 3 y 3 3 ELEMDENOTARYj�� 104 G35TH PL SV�I 3 N9j'F Lynnwood x 202 o a 238TH ST 5 j £ 3 237IN 238TH ST J 99 LEER WA 239TH PL SW O , / Mountlake Terrace PL' 44 3 J ns& ■ 40T ST SW X ST 5 a 3 °�' 1' VS Woodwa N\CK qD £ O Cemetary 3 240THP $W 240TH PL SW F y > ?, _ 9ya o 241ST P1"N 3 2415T SW W ti IST PLS $ y135T PL SW aKing County TEM$€ z 3 iE, z407H PL5 Q (�242 o Math ay Ilin r I a ° PL Sw 201 Snohomish County �ti L 243 DPL SNN N F Q m ar "D I 2ND PL SW C �n z �._ F 244TH ST 5WLo 2TH STSW - - 0.5 Miles June 2017 Packet Pg. 385 8.A.a E a� THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK L .N C d L L Q O U r O N O C O O C N N d L Q. Q Packet Pg. 386 8.A.a /_1»=161Q/:4=l Packet Pg. 387 8.A.a E a� THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK L .N C d L L Q O U r O N O C O O C N N d L Q. Q Packet Pg. 388 8.A.a Bacteriological Sampling Procedures 1. Sample site addresses are in the Bac-T Sample notebook in the meter shop. 2. Sample bottles and chlorine field test kits are also located in meter shop. Gather proper amount of sample bottles 1 Inspect sample bottles and do not use if bottle has broken seal, cracks, etc. Store bottles in ice cooler as you move from site to site. 4. Insure field test kit has proper amount of free and total DPD pillows. 5. Take Seattle sample stand key to unlock Seattle sample stands. 6. Meter box sampling tube is located in meter shop. Inspect for damage. 7. Disinfect sampling tube with chlorine solution at the shop. Spray entire sample tube inside and out. Spray inside of bag with chlorine solution. Place tube inside new plastic bag while transporting. 8. Gather proper amount of DOH sample forms and fill out according to instructions on backside of forms. 9. Go to first location of sampling site. 10. Pull meter box cover and remove PVC cap off adapter on water meter. Place disposable rubber gloves on hands. Disinfect gloves with chlorine solution. Spray connections on meter and sample tube with chlorine solution. Connect sample tube to adapter on meter. 11. Let water run for at least two minutes or more. 12. Using chlorine test kit follow instructions accordingly: A. Fill the bottle to the 10-m1 level on sample bottle in kit. B. Empty 10-ml DPD pillow (free) into bottle. Close lid. Shake until powder dissolves and wipe dry- C. Take blank sample bottle and insert into color meter test kit with white square pointing towards the front of the test kit and touch the zero button to zero out- D. Remove blank bottle and insert sample bottle with the DPD free pillow, white square pointing towards the front of the test kit. Touch read. This will tell you the free residual available in the water. E. Log this reading on the water sample C12 form. 13. Repeat procedures from #12 using the DPD (total) pillows to get the total residual results. Packet Pg. 389 8.A.a 14, When taking a bacteriological sample: A. Disinfect rubber gloves with chlorine solution (while on hands). B. Remove sample bottle cap. Be careful not to touch the rim of the sample bottle or under cap. Keep all foreign items from entering sample bottle i.e.: dust, rain, dirt, etc. Take sample and quickly replace cap and record information on form. C. ❑O NOT RINSE BOTTLE OR POUR OUT CONTENTS. Bottle has a chlorine neutralizing chemical inside. D. Fill the sampling bottle to the shoulder Uust below the neck) of the bottle or the 100-ml line. very carefully; and seal tightly. E. Remove sample tube from meter. Disinfect sample tube adapter and inside of plastic cap with chlorine solution. Place plastic cap on adapter. F. Fill out bacteriological form and rubber band form around bottle. G. Go to next location. 15. When done taking samples disinfect inside and outside of sampling tube with C12 solution at the meter shop. Hang on wall to air dry. Repeat steps 10-14 for next address. Note: In case of a had sample. The fallowing are instructions for taking repeat samptes: Go to site address where bad sample has been indicated by lab. 2. In the Bac-T sample notebook you will notice there are three sample sites in the gray shaded area under that site address. Those are the three site addresses where you will repeat the sampling procedures 1-13. 3. Takes samples to lab the same day the samples are taken. Wordata=ateN3acteriological 5ampHrig Procedures Packet Pg. 390 8.A.a APPENDIX C Packet Pg. 391 8.A.a E a� THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK L .N C d L L Q O U r O N O C O O C N N d L Q. Q Packet Pg. 392 8.A.a � 0 Y City of Edmonds Media Release Public Works and Utilities 121 5th -- Ave N, Edmonds, WA Inc. l K'L� FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: 7 October 2016 To: Media Contact: Phil Williams, Public Works and Utilities Director Phil mill iams edmondswa. ov, (425) 771-0235 BOIL. -WATER ADVISORY ISSUED FOR (—) WATER SYSTEM/NEIGHBORHOOD IN EDMONDS Advisory issued After Routine Testing Detects Unsafe Levels of (--) In Water; No Illnesses Reported (Edmonds, WA) - The City of Edmonds in partnership with the Washington State Department of Health has issued a boil -water advisory today, October 7t", to some customers of the (location) neighborhood in Edmonds after potentially harmfully (E. coli) bacteria were detected in the water. This water system, which is (location), serves about ( number of ) people (number of homes). However, the advisory is only for the approximately (number) homes in (location). Boil -water notices will be hand -delivered to each affected home. "Quote from Public Works Director here (how/what was detected, how serious it is/any Packet Pg. 393 8.A.a illnesses/what concern to public is/what next steps are," (***Follow up releases should also address 'how did this happen/how can it be prevented from happening again?' Reassure public of processes in place to protect water supply.) Customers in zones not affected by the boil water advisory (those whose homes are location) will not receive boil water notices, but may visit the water services' website for more information. A map showing the affected service area is available on the website. Water Service Company name, which owns and operates the water system, is working closely with the department of Health to track down the source of contamination. "Quote from health ❑fficial (level of health concern/what public should do to protect itself/any reports of illness/symptoms to watch for)" The bacteria were found in routine water quality monitoring samples, E. coli can cause gastrointestinal illness. To kill the bacteria, the ❑epartment of Health recommends that residents boil tap water they'll use for drinking, brushing teeth, preparing food, making ice, and washing dishes. Water should be heated to a brisk boil for one minute and allowed to cool before use. The advisory will remain in effect until the water meets safe drinking water standards. Customers with questions about their water quality can call (Washington Water Service at 253- 851-4060 or toll free at 877-408-4060.) Updates can also be found on the City of Edmonds website (hotlink here) and Facebook page (hotlink here). Packet Pg. 394 8.A.a /_1»=161QPAV4C Packet Pg. 395 8.A.a E a� THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK L .N C d L L Q O U r O N O C O O C N N d L Q. Q Packet Pg. 396 n X Co rt w co 4 WARNING: Do not drink tap water without boiling it first! ❑ Fecal coliform ❑ E. tali bacteria ❑ Other: were detected in the water supply on: (date) Boiling kills bacteria and other organisms in the water: • Bring water to a rolling boil for one minute ■ Let water cool before using To avoid possible illness: use boiled or purchased bottled water for drinking, making ice, brushing teeth, washing dishes, and food preparation until further notice. Contact your doctor, if you experience one or more of these symptoms: nausea; cramps, diarrhea, jaundice, headache and/or fatigue. People with chronic illnesses, infants and the elderly may be at higher risk and should seek medical advice. Water System: I.I.. County: Contact: Telephone: Date notice distributed: What is fecal coliform and E. tali? Fecal coliform and E. coli are bacteria whose presence indicates that the water may be contaminated with human or animal wastes. Microbes in these waters can cause short-term effects, such as diarrhea, cramps, nausea, headaches or other symptoms. They may pose a special health risk for infants, young children. some of the elderly; and people with severely compromised immune systems. How long will this warning be in effect? We will consult with the Washington State Department of Health about this incident. We will notify you when you no longer need to boil the water. Vea al reverso para la version en Espanol. WARNING: Do not drink tap water without boiling it first! ❑ Fecal coliform ❑ E. coli bacteria ❑ Other: were detected in the water supply on: (date) Boiling kills bacteria and other organisms in the water: ■ Bring water to a rolling boil for one minute • Let water cool before using To avoid possible illness: use boiled or purchased bottled water for drinking, making ice, brushing teeth, washing dishes, and food preparation until further notice. Contact your doctor, if you experience one or more of these symptoms: nausea, cramps, diarrhea, jaundice, headache and/or fatigue. People with chronic illnesses, infants and the elderly may be at higher risk and should seek medical advice. Water System: I. D.: County: Contact: Telephone: Date notice distributed: What is fecal coliform and E. coli? Fecal coliform and E. coli are bacteria whose presence indicates that the water may be contaminated with human or animal wastes. Microbes in these waters can cause short-term effects, such as diarrhea, cramps, nausea, headaches or other symptoms. They may pose a special health risk for infants, young children, some of the elderly, and people with severely compromised immune systems. How long will this warning be in effect? We will consult with the Washington State Department of Health about this incident. We will notify you when you no longer need to boil the water. Vea al reverso para la version en Espanol. October 2008 D iv Attachment: Edmonds Water System Plan June 2017 Agency Review (2167 : Presentation of 2017 October 2008 �a Q 06 L1,OZ fo uoi)e)uasOM : L94Z) Malnaa Aou96V L60Z aunt ueld uaa)sAS aa)eM spuouap3 :)uauayae))V ADVERTENCIA: iNo tome el agua de la Have sin antes hervirla! ❑ Bacteria coliforme fecal ❑ Bacteria E. coli ❑ Otra: fueron encontradas en su sistema de agua: (el dia) Hervir el agua mata a las bacterias y otros organismos en el agua: ■ Ponga el agua en la estufa hasta que hierva y deje hervir el agua por un minuto • Deje enfriar el agua antes de usarla Para evitar posibles enfermedades y hasta nuevo aviso: use agua hervida o agua potable embotellada pars tomar, hater hielo, limpiarse los dientes, lavar los platos y para preparar comidas. Hable con su doctor si usted tiene uno o mas de los siguientes sintomas: nausea, dolor estomacal, diarrea; ictericia, dolores de cabeza ylo cansancio. La gente con enfermedades cronicas, bebes y personas mayores de edad, pueden estar en situation de alto riesgo y deben consuitar con su medico o proveedores de servicios medicos. Sistema de agua: 1. D.: Condado: Contacto: Telefono: Fecha de notificacian: ,&Que son las bacterias coliforme fecal y E. tali? Coliformes fecales o E. soli son bacterias cuya presencia indica que el agua esta contaminada con desechos humanos o de animales. Microbios de esos desechos pueden causar diarrea, dolor estomacal, nausea, dolores de cabeza u otros sintomas. Pueden representar un peligro para la salud de bebes, ninas y nifias de corta edad y personas con sistemas inmunologicos en alto riesgo. ZPor cuanto tiempo va a estar en efecto esta advertencia? Vamos a consulter con el Departamento de Salud del estado de Washington acerca de este incidente. Le vamos a notificar cuando ya no sea necesario hervir el agua. ADVERTENCIA: iNo tome el agua de la Have sin antes her►►iria! ❑ Bacteria coliforme fecal ❑ Bacteria E. coli ❑ Otra: fueron encontradas en su sisterna de agua: (el dia) Hervir el agua mata a las bacterias y otros organismos en el agua: ■ Ponga el agua en la estufa hasta que hierva y deje hervir el agua por un minuto ■ ❑eje enfriar el agua antes de usarla Para evitar posibles enfermedades y hasta nuevo aviso: use agua hervida o agua potable embotellada para tomar, hater hielo, limpiarse los dientes, lavar los platos y para preparar comidas. Hable con su doctor si usted tiene uno o mas de los siguientes sintomas: nausea, dolor estomacal, diarrea, ictericia, dolores de cabeza ylo cansancio. La gente con enfermedades cronicas, bebes y personas mayores de edad, pueden estar en situacion de alto riesgo y deben consulter con su medico o proveedores de servicios medicos. Sistema de agua: I.D.. Condado: Contacto: Telefono: Fecha de notification: gQue son las bacterias coliforme fecal y E. coli? Coliformes fecales a E. coli son bacterias cuya presencia indica que el agua esta contaminada con desechos humanos o de animales. Microbios de esos desechos pueden causar diarrea; dolor estomacal, nausea, dolores de cabeza u otros sintomas. Pueden representar un peligro para la salud de bebes, ninas y ninas de corta edad y personas con sistemas inmunologicos en alto riesgo. jPor cuanto tiempo va a estar en efecto esta advertencia? Vamos a consulter con el Departamento de Salud del estado de Washington acerca de este incidente. Le vamos a notificar cuando ya no sea necesario hervir el agua. CO M a. m M a. See reverse side for English version. See reverse side for English version. 8.A.a APPENDIX E Packet Pg. 399 8.A.a E a� THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK L .N C d L L Q O U r O N O C O O C N N d L Q. Q Packet Pg. 400 RTCR Level 1 Assessment 1] Guidance Template 331 569, March 2016 Eastern 16201 East Indiana Avenue, Suite 1500 Region Spokane Valley, WA 99216 Send your Northwest 20425 72nd Ave. South, Suite 310 assessment to: Region Kent, WA 98032-2358 I Southwest PO Box 47823 Region Olympia, WA 98504-7823 Phone: 509.329,2100 Fax: 509.329.2104 Email: mark.steward@doh.wa.gov Phone 253.395.6750 Fax: 253.395.6760 Email: dw.nwro@doh.wa.gov Phone: 360-236-3030 Fax: 360-664-8058 Email: swro.coli@doh.wa..9ov Water System Name: Count Water System ID #: Operator in Responsible Charge (CRC): ORC Phone: Water System Mailing Address: CRC Address, City, State: Assessor Name: Assessor Address, City, State, Zip- Date(s) Assessment Cam leted: Your water system exceeded a treatment technique trigger for the Revised Total Coliform Rule. Assess the water system's condition and operation using this Level 1 Assessment Template as a guide. Part A: Respond to each item below. Identify corrective actions taken to address the issue(s) found. Part B: Summarize your findings and include an action plan with timetable for corrective actions not yet taken. For parts A and B, include additional information (photos or other documentation) as needed to depict assessment findings and corrective actions that have been completed. A11 assessment elements listed in this template must be addressed in your assessment. Systems with multiple facilities such as wells or storage tanks may need to provide additional pages. Within 30 days of learning of the treatment technique trigger, submit completed assessment documentation to your regional office and keep a copy in your water system riles. Part A: Assessment Corrective Corrective actions taken & date taken ( } action needed? 1. Site and Sampling Protocol 1 a. Da you have a written coliform monitoring plan & sampling procedure ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No that ensures samples are representative of the distributions stern? l b. Have there been any changes in sampling conditions or procedures that may have contributed to the treatment technique trigger? Describe: ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes [:]No 1 c. Inspect the sampling sites: - Are the sampling locations free of potential sources of contamination? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NIA ❑ Yes ❑ No Are the sampling taps in good condition? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NIA ❑ Yes ❑ No - Other: (describe) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NIA ❑ Yes ❑ No 00 0 3 you Attachment: Edmonds Water System Plan June 2017 Agency Review (2167 : Presentation of 2017 Comprehensive Water System Plan) (ueld uaa;st S Ja;eM 8A1suay9adwo3 L60Z 3o uol;e;uasaad : L96Z) N►alAeN Aoua6V LM eunp ueld we;sAS .ta}eM spuowp3 :}u9uat4oejjV O0 art A: Assessment Corrective Corrective action(s) taken & date taken action needed? Distribution 2a. Do you have procedures in place to ensure proper maintenance of the distribution system, including: - Appropriate pipe replacement and repair procedures ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No - Replacement and repair of other distribution system components ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No - Regular flushing program ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NIA ❑ Yes ❑ No - Routine vault inspections ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NIA ❑ Yes ❑ No - Fully implemented cross connection control program ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No - Maintain positive pressure in all parts of the distribution system ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No 2b.14as there been any recently reported low pressure (<20 PSI) or ❑ Yes[] No ❑ Yes ❑ No cam lete loss of pressure in the distributions stem? 2c. Have there been any changes in distribution conditions or operations ❑ Yes ❑ No that may have contributed to the treatment technique trigger? Describe: ❑ Yes ❑ No 2d.Inspect the distribution system: - Are there any visible line breaks or leaks? ❑Yes El No Yes ❑ No - Are there any observed unprotected cross connections? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No - Is there any evidence of vandalism or other security breaches? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No - Other: (describe) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Yes ❑ No 3. Storage Facilities 3a. Does your water system have a water storage tank? ❑ Yes ❑ No If no, skip to Section 4. 3b.Do you have procedures in place for periodic inspection and ❑ Yes ❑ No [—]Yes [—]No maintenance of the exterior and interior of each storage faciIit ? 3c. Have there been any changes in storage conditions or operations that may have contributed to the treatment technique trigger? Describe: El Yes [I No ❑ Yes ❑ No 3d.Inspect the storage facilities: - Does the tank have any cracks or other openings? ❑Yes ❑ No ❑Yes ❑ N❑ - Is the reservoir roof free of any unprotected openings? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No - Is the access hatch constructed and sealed to keep contaminants El Yes []No out. ❑ Yes ❑ No - if there is an air vent on the storage tank, is it constructed to prevent the entry of contaminants? ❑Yes ❑ No ❑NIA ❑ Yes ❑ No - Is the overflow fine constructed to prevent contaminants from entering the tank? ❑ Yes []No ❑ Yes ❑ No - If the overflow line discharges into a storm drain, to surface water, or directly into a sanitary sewer, is it protected by a proper air gap? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NIA ❑ Yes ❑ No - I there any evidence of vandalism or other security breaches? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No - Other: (describe) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NIA 0 Yes ❑ No N O a m a N O a m a o Attachment: Edmonds Water System Plan June 2017 Agency Review (2167 : Presentation of 2017 Comprehensive Water System Plan) Part A: Assessment ce1i cQ Corrective action needed? Corrective action(s) taken & date taken 4. Source --Groundwater ❑ Yes ❑ No 4a. Does your waters stem have a well orspring? If no, skip to Section 6. 4b.Do you comply with San itaEy Control Area requirements (WAC 246- ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No 290-135(2)? 4c. Have there been any changes in source conditions or operations that ❑Yes ❑ No may have contributed to the treatment technique trigger? Describe: ❑ Yes ❑ No 4d.Inspect the source facilities: - Is the sanitary control area free of all potential sources of contamination? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No - Is the wellhead or spring box above grade with no potential for flooding? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No - is the pressure tank water logged? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NIA ❑ Yes ❑ No - Is the well cap sealed and watertight, and the well casing free of unprotected openings? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NIA ❑ Yes ❑ No - (For springs) Is the spring box (structure, hatch, and overflow) free of any unprotected openings? [I Yes [I No [I N/A ❑Yes El No - Other: {describe} ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NIA ❑ Yes ❑ No S. Treatment --Groundwater ❑ Yes ❑ No 5a. Is any source continuously treated with a disinfectant? 1f no, skip to Section 6. 5b. Do you have procedures in place for proper operation and maintenance El Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No of disinfection treatment facilities? 5c. Have there been any changes in treatment equipment or process that ❑ Yes ❑ No may have contributed to the treatment technique trigger? Describe: ❑ Yes ❑ No 5d.Inspect the treatment facilities: - is the treatment system operating properly? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NIA ❑ Yes ❑ Na - is there any evidence of vandalism or other security breaches? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NIA ❑ Yes ❑ No - Other: (describe) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NIA ❑ Yes ❑ No 6. Source —Surface Water Supply (watershed) [] Yes ❑ No 6a. Does your water system have a surface water supply? If no, skip to Section 8. 6b.Do you comply with Watershed Control Program requirements (WAC ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No 246-290-135 4 ? u 6c. Have there been any changes within the watershed or in raw water Yes No El❑ conditions that may have contributed to the treatment technique D trigger? Describe: El Yes ❑ No co D sv (ueld W81S S Ja;eM 8A1suay9adwo3 L6OZ 3o uoi;e;uasaad : L96Z) MOIAeN Aoua6V LM eunp veld we;sAS .ta}eM spuowp3 :}uauayoejjV °0 art A: Assessment Corrective Corrective actions taken& date taken action needed? ( ) bd. Inspect the surface water intakelheadworks: - Is there evidence of problems at the intake? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No - Is there evidence of vandalism or other security breaches at the intake? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ Na - Other: (describe) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NIA ❑ Yes ❑ No 7. Treatment —Surface Water 7a. Do you have procedures in place for proper operation and maintenance ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No of surface water treatment facilities? 7b. Have there been any changes in treatment equipment or process that may have contributed to the treatment technique trigger`? Describe: ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ N❑ 7c. Inspect the treatment facilities: - Is the treatment system operating properly? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NIA ❑ Yes ❑ No - Is there any evidence of vandalism or other security breaches? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NIA ❑ Yes ❑ No - Other: (describe) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NIA ❑ Yes ❑ No S. Other assessment activities (describe): Part B. Assessment Summary and Action Plan with Timetable for corrective actions not yet taken ❑ ASSESSOR: CHECK HERE if you did not identify any issues that may have directly or indirectly caused or contributed to entry of coliform bacteria into the system, Corrective Actions Completed: ASSESSOR: Summarize the issues found and the corrective actions that have been completed and date completed Describe issue found I Describe corrective action taken and date completed Corrective Actions Not Completed: ASSESSOR: Describe the issues for which corrective actions have not yet been completed. Provide an action plan with timetable for completion. Describe issue found Describe planned corrective action and timetable for completion. Print Name of Assessor: OFFICE OF ❑RINKING WATER USE ONLY Regional Office Reviewer: Assessment sufficient? ❑ Yes ❑ No Corrective actions completed? ❑ Yes ❑ No v Comments: 0 x m rt tQ Signature of Assessor: Date of Review: Likely cause determined? ❑ Yes ❑ No Corrective action plan included? ❑ Yes ❑ No Date: Sanitary defect(s) identified? ❑ Yes ❑ No Corrective action plan approved? ❑ Yes ❑ No o Attachment: Edmonds Water System Plan June 2017 Agency Review (2167 : Presentation of 2017 Comprehensive Water System Plan) RTCR Level 2 Assessment Guidance Template 331-570, March 2016 Eastern Region Send your Northwest assessment to: Region 16201 East Indiana Avenue, Suite 1500 Spokane Valley, WA 99216 20425 72nd Ave. South, Suite 310 Kent, WA 99032-2358 Southwest PO Box 47823 Region Olympia, WA 98504-7823 Phone: 509.329,2100 Fax: 509,329.2104 Email: ma_r_k.st_eward@doh.wa.gov Phone- 253,395.6750 Fax: 253,395.6760 Email: dw.nwro@doh.wa.gov Phone: 360-236-3030 Fax: 360-664-8058 Email- swro.coli@doh.wa.gov Water System Name: County: Water System ID 0: ❑ erator in Responsible Charge (ORC): ORC Phone: Water System Mailing Address: ORC Address, City, State: Assessor Name: Assessor is: ❑ WDM-2, 3, or 4 ❑ Engineer ❑LHJ Assessor Address, City, State, Zip: Date(s) Assessment Completed: Your water system exceeded a treatment technique trigger for the Revised Total CoIiform Rule. Assess the water system's condition and operation using this Level 2 Assessment Template as a guide. Part A: Respond to each item below. Identify corrective actions taken to address the issue(s) found. Part B: Summarize your findings and include an action plan with timetable for corrective actions not yet taken. For parts A and B, include additional information (photos or other documentation) as needed to depict assessment findings and corrective actions that have been completed. All assessment elements listed in this template must be addressed in your assessment. Systems with multiple facilities such as wells or storage tanks may need to provide additional pages. Within 30 days of learning of the treatment technique trigger, submit completed assessment documentation to your regional office and keep a copy in your water system files. Part A: Assessment 1. Site and Sampling Protocol la. Do you have a written col iform monitorin [an & sarnplingprocedure that ensures samples are representative of the distribution system? l b. Do you have a program in place that ensures that all sample collectors are trained before bein allowed to collect compliance samples? 1 c. Do you regularly monitor the condition of each routine and repeat I sample site to ensure that no site will contaminate the sample? 1 d. Was the sample collected by a trained, qualified person? Corrective J Corrective action(s) taken & date taken action needed? I ❑ Yes ❑ No I []Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No le. Did the sampler follow your monitoring plan and sampling procedure? ❑ Yes ❑ No [-]Yes [—]No yok Attachment: Edmonds Water System Plan June 2017 Agency Review (2167 : Presentation of 2017 Comprehensive Water System Plan) (ueld W81S S Ja;eM 8A1suay9adwo3 L6OZ 3o uol;e;uasaad : L96Z) N►alAeN Aoua6V LM eunp ueld we;sAS .ta}eM spuowp3 :}uauatioejjV c� Q °0 Part A: Assessment Corrective action needed? Corrective action(s) taken & date taken 1 f. Was the sample collected representative of the water in the distribution ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No s stem? I g, Have there been any changes in sampling conditions or procedures that El Yes El No ❑Yes El No may have contributed to the treatment technique trigger? Describe: 1 h. Inspect the sampling sites: - Are the sampling locations free of potential sources of contamination? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No - Are the sampling taps in good condition? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No - Other: (describe) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No 2. Distribution 2a. Do you have procedures in place to ensure proper maintenance of the distribution system, including: - Appropriate pipe replacement and repair procedures ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No - Replacement and repair of other distribution system components ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No - Regular flushing program ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NIA ❑ Yes ❑ No - Routine vault inspections ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NIA ❑ Yes ❑ No - Fully implemented cross connection control program ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No - Maintain positive pressure in all parts of the distribution system ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No 2b.Following work done on the water system and following any pressure Yes [I No Yes No El Yes loss event, do you collect investigative coliform samples? 2b. Has there been any recently reported low pressure (<20 PSI) or Yes [I No El Yes El No complete loss of ressurg in the distributions stem? 2c. Have there been any recent repairs or new construction in the ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No distribution system? 2d. Are there any known pipe leaks that have not yet been repaired? ❑ Yes ❑ Na [I Yes ❑ No 2e. Has there been any recent use of fire hydrants such as hydrant ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NIA ❑ Yes ❑ No maintenance or utilitffD flushing? 2f. If there are there any air -vacuum relief valve vaults in the distribution ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NIA ❑ Yes ❑ No system, are any flooded? 2g. Has there been any recent report of a cross connection incident? ❑ yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No 2h. Have there been any off -normal events, such as discolored water, odd ❑Yes ❑ No El Yes ❑ No taste, or smell? 2i. Have there been any other changes in distribution conditions or ❑Yes ❑ No ❑Yes El No operations that may have contributed to the treatment technique trigger? Describe: Part A: Assessment Corrective Corrective actions taken & date taken action needed? 2j. Inspect the distribution system: - Are there any visible line breaks or leaks? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No - Are there any observed unprotected cross connections? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No - Is there any evidence of vandalism or other security breaches? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No - Other: (describe) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No 3. Storage Facilities 3a. Does your water system have a water storage tank? If no, skip to ❑ Yes ❑ No Section 4. 3b.Do you have procedures in place for periodic inspection and cleaning of the interior of each storage facility including vent, roof hatch, and [:]Yes❑ Na El Yes [:]No overflow? 3c. Has there been any recent work done on a storage facility? ❑ Yes ❑ No [:]Yes ❑ No 3d.Are all storage facilities secured from unauthorized entry and ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes [—]No vandalism? 3e. Have there been any other changes in storage conditions or operations ❑ Yes ❑ No []Yes ❑ No that may have contributed to the treatment technique trigger? Describe: 3f. Inspect the storage facilities: - Does the tank have any cracks or other openings? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No - Is the reservoir roof free of any unprotected openings? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No - Is the access hatch constructed and sealed to keep contaminants Out? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No - if there is an air vent on the storage tank, is it constructed to prevent the entry of contaminants? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NIA ❑ Yes ❑ No - Is the overflow line constructed to prevent contaminants from entering the tank? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No - if the overflow line discharges into a storm drain, to surface water, or directly into a sanitary sewer, is it protected by a proper air gap? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NIA ❑ Yes ❑ No - Is there any evidence of vandalism or other security breaches? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No - Other: (describe) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NIA ❑ Yes ❑ No 4. Source --Groundwater ❑ Yes ❑ No 4a. Does your water system have a well orspring? If no, skip to Section 6. 4b.Do you comply with Sanitary Control Area requirements (WAC 246- ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No 240-135(2)? 4c. Are all sources protected from fecal contamination by appropriate ❑Yes ❑ No ❑Yes ❑ No placement and construction? :: 4d. Have any unapproved sources recently been used? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No 1p 0 0o Attachment: Edmonds Water System Plan June 2017 Agency Review (2167 : Presentation of 2017 Comprehensive Water System Plan) (ueld WOJS S Ja;eM 8A1suay9adwo3 L60Z 3o uol;e;uasaad L91,Z) nnalAeN Aoua6V L60Z eunp ueld we;sAS as}eM spuowp3 :}uauayoejjV c� Q °0 Part A: Assessment Corrective action needed? Corrective action(s) taken & date taken 4e. Have there been any recent land use changes observed within a source ❑ yes ❑ No [—]Yes [—]No sanitary control area, such as construction, farming, or dumping in the last month? 4f. Has there been any standing water, heavy precipitation, or flooding [—]Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No around a source in the last month? 4g. Has there been any recent work done on a well or spring box? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No 4h. Has there been any recent failure of a source pump? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No 4i. Has there been any recent maintenance performed on a source pump or ❑ yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No other source component? 4j. Are the source facilities secured from unauthorized entry and ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No vandalism? 4k. Have there been any other changes in source conditions or operations ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No that may have contributed to the treatment technique trigger? Describe: 41. Inspect the source facilities: - Is the sanitary control area free of all potential sources of contamination? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No - Is the wellhead or spring box above grade with no potential for flooding? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No - Is the pressure tank water logged? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NIA ❑ Yes ❑ No - Is the well cap sealed and watertight, and the well casing free of unprotected openings? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NIA ❑ Yes ❑ No - (For springs) is the spring box (structure, hatch, and overflow) free of any unprotected openings? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NIA ❑ Yes ❑ No - Is there any evidence of vandalism or other security breaches? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NIA ❑ Yes ❑ No - Other: (describe) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NIA ❑ Yes ❑ No 5. Treatment --Groundwater 5a. Is any source continuously treated with a disinfectant? if no, skip to ❑ Yes ❑ No Section 5. 5b.Do you have procedures in place for proper operation and maintenance ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No of disinfection treatment facilities? 5c. If a disinfection residual should be continuously maintained throughout ❑ Yes ❑ No [—]Yes ❑ No the distribution system, was the measured free chlorine residual at the time of coliform sample collection below 0.2 m L? 5d. Have there been any recent interruptions in any treatment process? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No 5e. Has there been any recent maintenance performed on any treatment ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No component? Part A: Assessment Corrective Corrective action(s) taken & date taken action needed? 5f. Have there been any other changes in treatment equipment or process (—]Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No that may have contributed to the treatment technique trigger? Describe: 5g. Inspect the treatment facilities: - Is the treatment system operating properly? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No - Is there any evidence of vandalism or other security breaches? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No - Other: (describe) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NSA ❑ Yes ❑ No 6. Source —Surface Water Supply (watershed) ❑ Yes ❑ No 6a. Does your water system have a surface water supply? If no, skip to Section S. 6b. Do you comply with Watershed Control Program requirements (WAC ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No 246-290-135(4)? 6c. Has there been any recent spikes in raw water turbidity? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No 6d. Have there been any land use changes within the watershed, such as ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No loeeine. construction. or different farming- practices in the nast month? 6e. Have there been any other changes within the watershed or in raw ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes [:]No water conditions that may have contributed to the treatment technique trigger? Describe: 6f. Inspect the surface water intakelheadworks: - Is there evidence of problems at the intake? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No - Is there evidence of vandalism or other security breaches at the intake? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No - Other: (describe) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Yes ❑ No 7. Treatment —Surface Water ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No 7a. Do you have procedures in place for proper operation and maintenance of surface water treatment facilities? 7b. Have there been any recent interruptions in any part of the filtration or ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No disinfection treatmentprocess? 7c.Are filtration and disinfection treatment facilities properly operated and ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No maintained? 7d. Has there been any maintenance performed on any treatment ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No component in the past month? v rr) 7e. Have there been any problems with a treatment process in the past ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No M month, such as high finished water turbidity, disinfection inactivation ratio <1, or changes in coagulation practices or filtration rate? D Jz Attachment: Edmonds Water System Plan June 2017 Agency Review (2167 : Presentation of 2017 Comprehensive Water System Plan) F0 D iv (ueld W81S S Ja;eM 8A1suay9adwo3 L6OZ 3o uoi;e;uasaad L96Z) MOIAeN Aoua6V LM eunp ueld we;sAS as}eM spuowp3 :}uauataoejjV r � r � Q Corrective 00 art A: Assessment Corrective action(s) taken & date taken a action needed? 7f. Have there been any other changes in treatment equipment or process El Yes ❑ No ❑Yes ❑ No Y that may have contributed to the treatment technique trigger? Describe: a 7g. Inspect the treatment facilities: - is the treatment system operating properly? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No - Is there any evidence of vandalism or other security breaches? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No - Other: (describe) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NIA ❑ Yes ❑ No 8. Other assessment activities (describe): Part B. Assessment Summary and Action Plan with Timetable for corrective actions not yet taken ❑ ASSESSOR: CHECK HERE if you did not identify any issues that may have directly or indirectly caused or contributed to entry of coliform bacteria into the system. Corrective Actions Completed: ASSESSOR: Summarize the issues found and the corrective actions that have been completed and date completed I Describe issue found I Describe corrective action taken and date completed Corrective Actions Not Completed: ASSESSOR: Describe the issues for which corrective actions have not yet been completed. Provide an action plan with timetable for completion. I Describe issue found I Describe planned corrective action and timetable for completion. Print Name of Assessor: OFFICE OF DRINKING WATER USE ONLY Regional Office Reviewer. Assessment sufficient? ❑ Yes ❑ No orrective actions completed? ❑ Yes ❑ No a) a)mments: 0 x m rt (Q Signature of Assessor: Date of Review: Likely cause determined? ❑ Yes ❑ No Corrective action plan included? ❑ Yes ❑ No Date: Sanitary defect(s) identified? ❑ Yes ❑ No Corrective action plan approved? ❑ Yes ❑ No n' Attachment: Edmonds Water System Plan June 2017 Agency Review (2167 : Presentation of 2017 Comprehensive Water System Plan) co D iv 8.A.a C N t v APPENDIX L Packet Pg. 413 8.A.a E a� THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK L .N C d L L Q E O U r O N O C O O C N N d L Q. Q Packet Pg. 414 8.A.a Edmonds Chapter 7.10 WATER SERVICE Chapter 7.10 WATER SERVICE Sections: 7.10.010 Application for water use. 7.10.020 Accounts — Payments. 7.10.025 Delinquency charge. 7.10.030 Suspension of water use — Procedure. 7.10.040 Access to buildings. 7.10.050 Access to curb cocks and meter covers. 7.10.060 Limitation on water use. 7.10.061 Water restrictions — Powers of the city. 7.10.062 Water restrictions — Surcharge. 7.10.063 Enforcement. 7.10.065 Suspension of service — Failure to comply with sewer connection notice. 7.10.070 Turn on and turn off charges. 7.10.080 Request for inspection of meters. 7.10.110 Charge and bill adjustments. 7.10.120 Service connections. 7.10.130 Service pipe — Depth and size — Work left uncovered until inspected. 7.10.140 Dormant services — Connections. 7.10.150 Service pressure corrections. 7.10.160 Stop and waste valves. 7.10.170 Water shut-off — Temperature relief valve, pressure relief valve, and check valve required. 7.10.180 Unlawful acts. Page 1/18 7.10.010 Application for water use. All applications for the use of water shall be made at the development services department by the owner, or by the owner's authorized agent, on printed forms furnished by said department for that purpose, and shall contain the name and description of the lot, block and addition. The applicant shall state the purposes for which the water is to be used and shall agree to conform to the ordinances, rules, and regulations, with modification which may be adopted, as a condition for use of water. [Ord. 3629 § 2, 2007; Ord. 2214 § 1, 1981; Ord. 2139 § 3, 1980; Ord. 413 § 9, 1929]. 7.10.020 Accounts — Payments. A. All accounts shall be kept in the name of the owner, and all charges shall be made against the property as well as the owner thereof. No change of ownership or occupancy shall affect the application of this section. All bills are payable within 25 days from the billing date. If water bills are not paid within a stated period, the water will be shut off. Water will be turned on after payment of the fees as set forth in ECC 7.10.070, in addition to the amount of delinquent charges. B. At least 10 days before water is scheduled to be shut off, the administrative services director, or a designated city official, shall notify the owner and the occupant of the property. The owner shall be notified by mail at the address on the account, and the occupant shall be notified by mail, door hanger or other form at the property. Mailed notices shall be deemed received three business days after mailing. All notices shall contain the following: 1. Reason for water shut off, 2. Delinquent amount that needs to be paid to avert interruption in water service; 3. Instructions on scheduling a hearing to show that the account is not delinquent; and 4. The day on or after which water will be shut off. The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code are current through Ordinance 4061, passed March 23, 2017. Packet Pg. 415 Edmonds Page 2/18 Chapter 7.10 WATER SERVICE C. After notification, the owner and the occupant shall be afforded the opportunity to present to the administrative services director, or a designated official, evidence that the delinquent charges have been paid. Such opportunity M shall be afforded before the water is shut off, provided, that the owner or the occupant make a request for the same (L to the administrative services director, or a designated official, within three days of presumptive receipt of the E notice. The burden shall be on the owner and/or occupant to prove that the delinquent charges have been paid. 4) D. After reviewing the evidence by the owner and/or occupant, the administrative services director, or the Cn designated official to whom the evidence was presented, shall decide whether or not the account remains delinquent. The owner and the occupant shall be notified of the decision, and this decision shall not be subject to further appeal. If the account is found to be delinquent and water has not been shut off, water will be shut off as previously > scheduled or three days after final decision, whichever date is later. If the account is not found to be delinquent and Z water has been shut off, water will be turned on without being subject to turn on and turn off charges in ECC 7.10.070. [Ord. 3629 § 3, 2007; Ord. 2214 § 2, 1981; Ord. 2139 § 4, 1980; Ord. 1942 § 1, 1977; Ord. 1385 § 1, 1968; Ord. 1082 § 1, 1965; Ord. 821, 1960; Ord. 413 § 10, 1929]. Q. E 7.10.025 Delinquency charge. V A charge equal to $25.00 shall be added as a fee to each delinquent utility bill, except in cases of extraordinary hardship as determined by the finance director or his/her designee. The decision of the finance director can be N appealed to the Edmonds city council by filing an appeal with the city clerk no later than 14 days after the director's — decision was mailed. The account shall be considered delinquent if full payment is not made within 35 days after the r- sending of the regular billing. Such delinquency notice and billing will be provided 35 days following the mailing of a regular utility bill. This charge shall be applicable to all delinquent utility billing accounts. In order to be c considered delinquent the outstanding principal balance of an account must total at least $40.00, and no delinquency N charge shall be levied against any account balance under $40.00. This delinquency charge shall be paid prior to the m application of any payment against the fee or charge initially assessed and nothing herein shall be interpreted to limit a the city's collection of its attorneys' fees and other reasonable costs and charges in the event it is forced to seek ti judicial remedy for collection. Nothing herein shall be interpreted to limit the city's ability to enforce a sewerage lien on properties for delinquent and unpaid sewerage utility bills, as authorized by RCW 35.67.200 through 35.67.290, including terminating water service until charges are paid and/or pursuing sewerage lien foreclosure. m [Ord. 4000 § 1, 2015; Ord. 3629 § 4, 2007]. 2 7.10.030 Suspension of water use - Procedure. m Should a customer desire to discontinue the use of water for a period of time, notice thereof must be given in writing to the utility billing department. The water will then be shut off and turned on again upon notice to the utility billing department. The customer shall be required to pay charges as set forth in ECC 7.10.070. [Ord. 3629 § 5, 2007; Ord. Q 1942 § 2, 1977; Ord. 1448, 1969; Ord. 413 § 17, 1929]. r 0 N 7.10.040 Access to buildings. Employees of the water division shall have access during business hours to all parts of buildings to which water may be delivered from the city mains for the purpose of ascertaining the number of rooms and families in the house or inspecting the conditions of the pipes and fixtures and the manner in which water is used. [Ord. 413 § 19, 1929]. M a 7.10.050 Access to curb cocks and meter covers. E d The water division shall have free access to curb cocks and water meter covers. All persons are prohibited from piling rubbish, building, or other materials thereon. [Ord. 413 § 20, 1929]. Cn 7.10.060 Limitation on water use. L M In the event that a supplier notifies the city of a shortage of water or the director reasonably determines such a shortage to be imminent, the community services director or his/her designee is authorized to implement the water -a shortage response plan in order to efficiently safeguard the safety and health of the general public or to provide for c the public convenience. The use of water in the city, or in any portion thereof, for irrigation, cooling, sprinkling or E other uses may be forbidden, restricted, or regulated and such regulations may be made effective as to all customers w or as to particular classes of customers. Rationing may be imposed during any shortage of water, either in lieu of or in addition to other measures hereby authorized. E t M Q The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code are current through Ordinance 4061, passed March 23, 2017. Packet Pg. 416 Edmonds Page 3/18 Chapter 7.10 WATER SERVICE A. Upon receiving notification from a water supplier of an impending water emergency, the community services director will notify the mayor and city council within 24 hours or on the next business day that a water emergency will be or has been declared. a E B. The mayor or community services director will issue a public notification of the declaration of water emergency and imposition of restrictions. Cn C. Restrictions will be in effect immediately upon issuance of the public notification. Restrictions and the amount of a; surcharge for violations of mandatory restrictions will be posted and published within seven days of declaration at f° least one time in a daily newspaper of general circulation. Notification will be delivered to television and radio (D stations to provide public information coverage. > .y D. For emergencies when restrictions may extend beyond 21 days, public hearing before the city council will be c scheduled by the community services director within seven days following the declaration of emergency. [Ord. 2774 a § 1, 1990]. E 0 c.� 7.10.061 Water restrictions — Powers of the city. n The community services director or his/her designee shall conduct public education efforts regarding the benefits c and necessity of conservation by the public, and is authorized to promulgate such rules and regulations as may be necessary to implement water use restriction. The regulations will be on file with the city clerk, and the regulations 0 and any amendment thereto shall be effective 30 days after said filing with the city clerk. The community services 0 director or his/her designee is further authorized to make exceptions to such restrictions in specific cases as he/she a finds reasonable which may in the director's discretion include, but are not limited to, watering newly seeded or sodded lawns, food sources, landscape ornamental plantings required by the architectural design board, when U) necessary to alleviate unnecessary economic hardship to commercial or industrial activities, or to prevent possible a` damage to health, safety or welfare. [Ord. 2774 § 2, 1990]. m 7.10.062 Water restrictions — Surcharge. v It is unlawful for any person to violate water use and restrictions and violation of these provisions shall be a misdemeanor punishable under the general penalty provisions of this code. In addition to other lawful remedies, the m community services director or his/her designee is authorized to impose a surcharge for the first occurrence after a documented warning notice and each subsequent violation in which a customer's water usage practices exceed water conservation restrictions as provided for in this chapter. Said surcharge will be added to and become a part of the water bill for the customer in addition to any service rate amounts as set forth in Chapter 7.10 ECC. Prior to the d imposition of the first surcharge, a public works division representative shall deliver in person or post a notice at the Q service address advising of the customer's water usage practices in excess of mandatory water shortage restrictions r and advising that a surcharge may be imposed for any further violations. A copy of the violation notice shall also be c N mailed to the owner and/or occupant. The community services director shall promulgate regulations providing for m appeal of any notice of violation. Appeals must be received within five working days of delivery of notice of violation. c 0 A. Surcharges for violations of water restrictions in effect for the balance of 1990 and until thereafter adjusted shall a be: E d $25.00 for first violation; >% Cn $50.00 for each violation thereafter. L B. Surcharges for all customer classes will be reviewed annually based on actual or projected expenses of the water division necessary to maintain a water supply during an emergency. [Ord. 2774 § 3, 1990]. c E 7.10.063 Enforcement. w A. The community services director, or his/her designee, including any employee of the city of Edmonds public works division, or field personnel of the community services department, or police officer of the city, shall have the d authority to enforce the provisions of this chapter. E t 0 Q The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code are current through Ordinance 4061, passed March 23, 2017. Packet Pg. 417 8.A.a Edmonds Page 4/18 Chapter 7.10 WATER SERVICE B. In addition to the surcharges provided in ECC 7.10.062, the community services director or his/her designee is authorized to install a water restricting device on the waterline or lines serving any person who commits a second or subsequent violation of any of the provisions of this chapter. Alternatively, after such notice of a violation as may reasonably be given based on the circumstances, the community services director or his/her designee may cause water service to be terminated for subsequent or continuing violation of water conservation restrictions. [Ord. 2774 § 4, 1990; Ord. 2214 § 3, 1981; Ord. 1942 § 3, 1977; Ord. 547, 1943; Ord. 413 § 21A, 1929]. 7.10.065 Suspension of service — Failure to comply with sewer connection notice. A. There exists within the city of Edmonds certain earth subsidence and landslide hazard areas, and other environmentally sensitive areas in which the discharge of sanitary waste from private septic tanks constitutes a hazard to the public health, safety and welfare of the city. Such areas may be designated by the city council or by order of the public works director. The Meadowdale landslide hazard area, as defined and described in documents on file with the city of Edmonds and available for inspection at the request of any individual, is hereby declared to be such an area. Failure of any owner or owners of residential or commercial structures located within such a designated area to connect with available sanitary sewers following notice given in accordance with RCW 35.67.190 is hereby declared to be a public hazard and nuisance. B. When any owner or owners of property have failed to connect within the period established by written notification, the community services director or his designee shall cause a notification of shut-off of water service to be delivered to the owners of such properties by registered mail. The notice shall specify that water service shall be terminated by the city within 10 days of the date of notice unless: 1. The owner or owners shall cause the property to be connected to the public sewer within such period; or 2. The owner or owners shall apply for a building permit within said 10-day period and connect to the sewer line, present a written contract or adequate assurance between the owner and a licensed plumber evidencing an enforceable obligation and intent to connect to such line and provide a bond in an amount sufficient to fulfill the terms of such agreement in the event that the owner defaults thereon. C. In the event the owner fails to connect to the sewer line within the 10-day period or to provide the adequate assurances required by subsection (13)(2) of this section, water service to such residential or commercial structures and to the property on which they are located shall be discontinued. Service shall not again be instituted until such time as the owner has connected to the sewer system, paid the actual costs of the city including, but not limited to, disconnecting, reconnecting, notifying the owner and otherwise taking action with respect to the requirements of this section. The actual cost thereof may vary, but the city council hereby establishes such reconnection fee to be $250.00; provided, however, that in the event the actual costs are greater, they may be imposed by written order of the community services director or his designee and the reconnection shall not be completed until such time such assessed costs are paid. In the event that the owner or owners believe that the reconnection charges are in excess of the amount actually incurred or which reasonably may be incurred the city, the owner or owners may appeal the set fee or additionally designated fee to the hearing examiner in the same manner as if it were a Type II decision (see Chapter 20.01 ECDC). [Ord. 3736 § 6, 2009; Ord. 2676 § 1, 1988]. 7.10.070 Turn on and turn off charges. The charge for turning off the water at the main shall be $20.00 and the charge for turning on the water at the main shall be $20.00 if done during regular working hours. If the water is turned on or off at any time other than during regular working hours, there shall be an additional charge of $125.00. [Ord. 4000 § 2, 2015; Ord. 3629 § 6, 2007; Ord. 2880 § 2, 1992; Ord. 2214 § 4, 1981; Ord. 2179 § 2, 1980; Ord. 2139 § 5, 1980; Ord. 1942 § 5, 1977]. 7.10.080 Request for inspection of meters. The water division, upon the request of any water user, shall inspect the water meter on the user's premises. A deposit of $20.00 shall be made with such request to cover the cost of such inspection. In the event such meter is found to be overregistering, such deposit shall be returned to the depositor; otherwise, said deposit shall be retained by the city. [Ord. 3629 § 7, 2007; Ord. 821, 1960; Ord. 413 § 22, 1929]. 7.10.110 Charge and bill adjustments. The administrative services director, or such authorized representative as he may designate, is authorized to make adjustments or corrections to billings for any charge for water service, including but not limited to connection The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code are current through Ordinance 4061, passed March 23, 2017. Packet Pg. 418 8.A.a Edmonds Page 5/18 Chapter 7.10 WATER SERVICE charges, minimum monthly billings, meter charges, penalty and special charges, improperly charged rates, and, subject to the city council's approval, the cancellation of uncollectible bills and accounts. [Ord. 3629 § 8, 2007; Ord. 0 2179 § 2, 1980]. a E 7.10.120 Service connections. °' A. All tapping of mains, installation of corporation cock, service pipe leading from the mains to the property line, as well as the turning on and off of the water shall be performed by the water division. All connections inside of the Cn L_ premises shall be made by the owner and at his expense. 4) B. In case of application for water service on premises not abutting upon a street upon which there is a city water (D main, the city will lay its connection from the main toward the premises for a distance equal to the distance from the > .y main to the curbline, the distance in no case to exceed 40 feet, and permit connection therewith by means of a union, d or may, at the discretion of the director of public works, upon advance payment of the estimated cost thereof, extend d the service to the premises of the applicant, but shall not cross or enter private property. [Ord. 413 § 12, 1929]. a E 7.10.130 Service pipe — Depth and size — Work left uncovered until inspected. V All pipes leading from the city's service connection shall be laid not less than 24 inches below the surface of the r� ground and no work shall be covered up until it has been inspected and accepted by the water division. No such N pipes smaller than three -fourths of an inch shall be used. [Ord. 413 § 13, 1929]. — 7.10.140 Dormant services — Connections. c o Any service connection which shall have been inactive, unused or abandoned for a period of 60 days or the house a removed from the lot for at least one day shall be considered a dormant service and the meter shall be removed by the water division. If a service connection is subsequently desired for all or a portion of the premises or property previously supplied by a dormant service, the owner of the premises or property or his authorized agent shall make a` application and pay a service charge in the amount shown in ECC 7.10.090. m 7.10.150 Service pressure corrections. v A. Where the water pressure at the main is 80 PSI or greater, the customer may install an approved type strainer and $ pressure regulator on his own premises in an accessible location. All costs of installation, operation, and m maintenance shall be borne by the customer. B. In services where the water pressure at the main is considered by the customer to be lower than the desired pressure, such customer may, after first requesting and receiving approval of the director of public works, install a d pump and pneumatic tank, or by other approved means provide increased pressure to the premises. The location of Q such installation shall be on the customer's premises and he shall bear all costs of installation, operation, and i• maintenance thereof. o N 7.10.160 Stop and waste valves. 4) Customers shall, at their own expense, install and maintain all pipes, connections and fixtures from the meter placed by the city. All pipes must be provided with stop and waste valves, protected from freezing and accessible at all M times to the customer. The valves shall be located in such manner that said pipes may be drained to prevent freezing a and the water may be shut off to repair pipes, fixtures, and appliances, and also to safeguard premises from water E damage in case the meter is accidentally turned on. Additional stop and waste valves shall also be placed at all low N points in the pipes when they cannot be otherwise drained. The city shall refuse to turn on the water until the N provisions of this section are complied with. The city shall not be responsible for freezing, accident or damage of any kind beyond the property line. [Ord. 2179 § 1, 1980; Ord. 413 § 14, 1929]. M 7.10.170 Water shut-off — Temperature relief valve, pressure relief valve, and check valve required. A. The city may shut off water from the main at any time for the purpose of making repairs without giving advance 0 notice to the property owner. The city shall not be responsible for any damage proximately caused by said shut-off E or failure to give notice of said shut-off. w B. All persons having boilers on their premises for the purpose of heating with hot water or radiant heat are required to have installed, at their expense, a temperature relief valve, pressure relief valve, and a check valve. The owner of E the premises shall be responsible to the city for any damages to city water meters caused by water from the owner's U M Q The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code are current through Ordinance 4061, passed March 23, 2017. Packet Pg. 419 Edmonds Chapter 7.10 WATER SERVICE Page 6/18 premises. The city shall not be responsible for the safety of boilers, hot water tanks, piping or other similar apparatus on the premises of any water customer. C. The provisions of subsection B shall apply to all boilers presently existing in the city and those installed in the future. All boilers not in compliance at the effective date of this section shall be brought into compliance within six months of the effective date of this section. [Ord. 2009 § 1, 1978; Ord. 413 § 15, 1929]. 7.10.180 Unlawful acts. It is unlawful for any person, corporation, or association to break, damage, or injure in any way any pipe, gate, meter or other water system appliance, or to interfere in any manner with the proper operation of any part of the water system of the city of Edmonds, or to make connection to or alterations in any pipe whereby water may be drawn from the city mains or to take water from any fire hydrant, bibb, pipe, or fixture of any kind, without first having secured a permit from the water division or proper city official. [Ord. 821, 1960; Ord. 413 § 16, 1929]. The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code are current through Ordinance 4061, passed March 23, 2017. Packet Pg. 420 8.A.a Edmonds Chapter 7.20 BACKFLOW PREVENTION Chapter 7.20 BACKFLOW PREVENTION Page 7/18 Sections: 7.20.010 Definitions. 7.20.020 Cross -connections declared unlawful. 7.20.030 Backflow prevention devices to be installed. 7.20.040 Private water supply systems. 7.20.050 Adoption of state regulations. 7.20.060 Abatement of unlawful cross -connections and installation of backflow prevention devices — Procedures 7.20.070 Penalties. 7.20.010 Definitions. A. "Backflow" means a flow, other than the intended direction of flow, of any foreign liquids, gases, or substances into the distribution system of a public water supply. B. `Backflow prevention device" means a device approved by the state of Washington, Department of Social and Health Services or such other state department as has jurisdiction over the subject matter and by the American Water Works Association, used to counteract back pressure or prevent back siphonage into the distribution system of a public water supply. C. "Cross -connection" means any physical arrangement whereby a public water supply is connected, directly or indirectly, with any other water supply system, sewer, drain, conduit, pool, storage reservoir, plumbing fixture or other device which contains or may contain contaminated water, sewage or other wastes or liquids of unknown or unsafe quality, which may be capable of imparting contamination to a public water supply as a result of backflow. [Ord. 1711 § 1, 1974]. 7.20.020 Cross -connections declared unlawful. The installation or maintenance of a cross -connection, which, in the opinion of the director of public works or his designee, will endanger the water quality of the potable water supply of the city of Edmonds, is unlawful. [Ord. 1711 § 1, 1974]. 7.20.030 Backflow prevention devices to be installed. Backflow prevention devices, when required to be installed in the opinion of the director of public works or his designated representative, shall be installed and maintained by the service customer on any service connection to the city of Edmonds water supply system where the backflow prevention devices are necessary for the protection of the city of Edmonds' water supply. [Ord. 1711 § 1, 1974]. 7.20.040 Private water supply systems. Use or operation of a private water supply system, contrary to the provisions of the ordinances of the city of Edmonds, or the laws of the state of Washington or the rules and regulations of the State Board of Health regarding public water supplies where the private system is served by the city public water supply is unlawful. [Ord. 1711 § 1, 1974]. 7.20.050 Adoption of state regulations. The community services director or his/her designee is hereby authorized to develop rules and regulations based upon and including the requirements of the rules and regulations of the State Board of Health regarding public water supplies and the protection of such supplies from contamination entitled "Cross -Connection Control Regulations in Washington State," the provisions of WAC 246-290-490, and the American Waterworks Association, Pacific Northwest Second Edition of "Accepted Procedure and Practice in Cross -Connection Manual." The provisions of the Washington Administrative Code, the rules and regulations of the Department of Health set forth in the Cross -Connection Control Regulations in Washington State and the previously referenced Accepted Procedure and Practice in Cross -Connection Manual are hereby adopted by this reference as fully as if herein set forth in full. Any additional rules and procedures necessary to implement such regulations shall be developed by the community services director or his/her designee as appropriate. Such rules and regulations shall be kept on file along with copies The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code are current through Ordinance 4061, passed March 23, 2017. Packet Pg. 421 Edmonds Page 8/18 Chapter 7.20 BACKFLOW PREVENTION of the above referenced regulations and manuals in the office of the city engineer of the city of Edmonds. [Ord. 2956 § 1, 1993; Ord. 1711 § 1, 1974]. r_ M a 7.20.060 Abatement of unlawful cross -connections and installation of backflow prevention devices — E Procedures. +3 Cross -connections declared in this chapter to be unlawful whether presently existing or hereinafter installed and/or services requiring backflow prevention devices and/or unlawful use or operation of a private water supply system served by the city public water supply are public nuisances and, in addition to any other provisions of this code or the ordinances of the city of Edmonds on abatement of public nuisances, shall be subject to abatement in accordance with the following procedure: > Z A. In the event that the director of public works or his designee determines that a nuisance as herein provided does d exist, written notice shall be sent to the person in whose name the water service is established under the records of d the city of Edmonds water division, or alternatively, a copy of such written notice shall be posted on the premises a served. o V B. The notice shall provide that the nuisance described herein shall be corrected within 30 days of the date the notice r- is mailed or posted on the premises. N C. In the event the nuisance is not abated within the prescribed time, water service to the premises shall be 4- 0 discontinued. c o M D. In the event that the nuisance, in the opinion of the director of public works or his designated representative, presents an immediate danger of contamination to the public water supply, service from the city water supply system U) to the premises may be terminated without prior notice; provided, however, notice will be posted on the premises in a the manner heretofore provided at the time the service is terminated. [Ord. 1711 § 1, 1974]. ti m 7.20.070 Penalties. N In addition to the remedies set forth herein, any person found guilty of violating any of the provisions of this chapter 3 shall be subject to the penalties as set forth in ECC 5.50.020. [Ord. 1711 § 1, 1974]. m m c d a� Q ti T 0 N C 7 7 C R (L E Q The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code are current through Ordinance 4061, passed March 23, 2017. Packet Pg. 422 Edmonds Chapter 7.30 WATER RATES AND SEWER CHARGES Chapter 7.30 WATER RATES AND SEWER CHARGES Sections: 7.30.010 Definitions. 7.30.020 Separate single-family residence meters. 7.30.030 Water rates — Meter installation charges. 7.30.035 Water and sewer utility general facilities charges. 7.30.036 Sewer special connection districts. 7.30.040 Utility charges — Sanitary sewer. 7.30.045 Special connection charge. 7.30.050 Unauthorized use of water. 7.30.060 Severability. 7.30.070 Water, sewer and stormwater rate reductions for low income citizens. 7.30.080 Reserved. 7.30.090 Penalties. Page 9/18 7.30.010 Definitions. A. "Dwelling unit" means a building or portion thereof providing complete housekeeping facilities for one family. B. "Single-family residence" means a detached building containing one dwelling unit only. C. "Duplex" means a building, occupying a lot, containing two dwelling units. D. "Apartment houses" and other "multiple units" (except hotels, tourist courts, trailer parks, and motels) means a building or buildings used for and containing three or more dwelling units occupied on a weekly or monthly basis. Units rented on a weekly or monthly basis shall not be deemed to be tourist courts or motels. E. "Hotels" means any place with individual rooms rented on a daily or weekly basis. F. "Tourist courts" and "motels" means detached multiple units, occupied and paid for on a daily basis. G. "Office buildings" includes all types of professional and business offices, including but not limited to architects, engineers, lawyers, doctors, dentists, real estate offices, etc. H. "Commercial" and "retail buildings" mean all types of retail and commercial business establishments other than office buildings and other than industrial or manufacturing, and each such business shall be considered as a separate unit even though two or more may be in the same building. I. In the event there is more than one type of operation in the same building, i.e., a professional office, a retail store, a restaurant, or an apartment, then in that case each separate category or type shall pay at the rate fixed under that particular category or type. J. "Equivalent residential unit" or "ERU" means a sewer connection charge based upon the winter standard water consumption of a single-family residence of 7.07 per 100 cubic feet of water. [Ord. 3339 § 1, 2000; Ord. 786 § 1, 1959]. 7.30.020 Separate single-family residence meters. Each single-family residence building or structure served by water shall be provided with its own separate water meter. Prior to the time when such additional separate meters can be installed, water rates shall be applicable on the same basis as if the separate meters were actually installed. [Ord. 1449, 1969]. 7.30.030 Water rates — Meter installation charges. A. Base Rate. The bimonthly rates of water supplied through meters shall be fixed at the following levels: The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code are current through Ordinance 4061, passed March 23, 2017. Packet Pg. 423 8.A.a Edmonds Page 10/18 Chapter 7.30 WATER RATES AND SEWER CHARGES Current 1/1/2017 1/1/2018 1/1/2019 Single-family residence (per unit) $28.68 $31.26 $34.07 $37.14 Duplex, apartment houses, condos and other multiunit $25.26 $27.53 $30.01 $32.71 residences (per unit) All other customers: Current Meter 1/1/2017 1/1/2018 1/1/2019 $34.68 3/4" $37.80 $41.20 $44.91 $70.60 1" $76.95 $83.88 $91.43 $130.55 11/2" $142.30 $155.11 $169.07 $199.04 2" $216.95 $236.48 $257.76 $429.38 3" $468.02 $510.15 $556.06 $608.22 4" $662.96 $722.63 $787.66 $1,233.55 6" $1,344.57 $1,465.58 $1,597.48 B. Variable Rate. In addition to the base rate set forth above, the customer shall be charged the following rate per 100 cubic feet of water consumed: Current 1/1/2017 1/1/2018 1/1/2019 $2.99 $3.26 $3.55 $3.87 All water base rate and variable rate charges on water utility bills mailed on or after January 1 st of each year shall be based on rates as reflected in this section corresponding with said time period. C. Meter Installation Charges. 1. New service line and meter installation charges are fixed as follows: a.3/4" $550.00 b. 1" $800.00 2. The actual cost of street restoration (with regard to all surface streets) shall be added to any meter installation charge, if applicable. 3. When approved by the city engineer, new service lines installed by a developer on a plat shall be credited as follows: a.3/4" $175.00 b. 1" $200.00 D. All rates set forth in this section shall be exclusive of any applicable taxes. E. Repealed by Ord. 3618. [Ord. 4052 § 1, 2016; Ord. 3945 § 1, 2013; Ord. 3903 § 1, 2012; Ord. 3802 § 1, 2010; Ord. 3618 § 2, 2006; Ord. 3616 §§ 1 - 3, 2006; Ord. 3400 § 1, 2002; Ord. 3339 § 2, 2000; Ord. 2974 §§ 1 and 2, 1994; Ord. 2898 § 1, 1992; Ord. 2880 § 1, 1992; Ord. 2657 § 1, 1988; Ord. 2361 § 1, 1983; Ord. 2339 § 2, 1982; Ord. 2305 § 2, 1982; Ord. 2255 § 1, 1981; Ord. 2211 § 1, 1981; Ord. 2197 § 1, 1981; Ord. 2139, 1980; Ord. 1963 § The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code are current through Ordinance 4061, passed March 23, 2017. Packet Pg. 424 8.A.a Edmonds Chapter 7.30 WATER RATES AND SEWER CHARGES Page 11/18 1, 1977; Ord. 1898 § 1, 1977; Ord. 1709 § 1, 1974; Ord. 1457 § 1, 1970; Ord. 1385 § 2, 1968; Ord. 1263 § 1, 1967; Ord. 901, 1961; Ord. 786 § 2, 1959]. 7.30.035 Water and sewer utility general facilities charges. A general facilities charge (GFC) (formerly known as a "connection charge") shall be paid by each new customer connecting to the city's water or sewer system in accordance with the following requirements: A. Sewer System GFC. The sanitary sewer GFC shall be paid by the applicant at the time and according to the date of side sewer permit issuance in an amount per equivalent residential unit (ERU) added as a result of the development as set forth in the table below; provided, that nonresidential building permit and business license applicants shall pay sewer system GFC when the proposed structure and/or business activity would generate additional probable sewer usage. 2012 effective date 2012 before effective date forward 2013 2014 and beyond Sewer GFC per ERU $730.00 $2,573.50 $3,495.25 $4,417.00 1. A single-family residential applicant shall pay a GFC equal to one ERU per dwelling unit. 2. A multifamily residential applicant shall pay a GFC equal to 0.67 ERU per dwelling unit. 3. Applicants for nonresidential development shall pay a GFC equal to the ERU determination that is made by the public works director. This determination shall be made by estimating the probable sewer usage of the proposed development. In estimating the probable sewer usage, the public works director may consider, among other factors, the average winter water consumption for similar existing development in the city. If the applicant disagrees with the director's ERU determination, the applicant may submit additional information and analysis from a qualified engineer, with an additional $200.00 review fee, in support of a request for an alternate ERU determination. The director shall review the request for an alternate ERU determination and may accept the alternate calculation, revise the earlier ERU determination based on the new information, or uphold the earlier ERU determination. Once the director has made a final ERU determination, the applicant may pay the GFC under protest and appeal the determination, along with the underlying permit, to the hearing examiner. B. Water System GFC. The water system GFC shall be paid upon, and according to the date of, application for water service, and based upon the size of the meter to be installed, as set forth in the table below: 2012 effective date Water Meter Size 2012 before effective date forward 2013 2014 and beyond 3/4" meter $908.00 $2,979.00 $4,014.50 $5,050.00 1" meter $2,270.00 $7,447.00 $10,035.50 $12,624.00 1.5" meter $4,540.00 $14,894.00 $20,071.00 $25,248.00 2" meter $7,264.00 $23,830.50 $32,113.75 $40,397.00 3" meter $14,528.00 $47,661.00 $64,227.50 $80,794.00 4" meter $22,700.00 $74,470.00 $100,355.00 $126,240.00 6" meter $45,400.00 $148,940.00 $200,710.00 $252,480.00 8" meter $72,640.00 $238,304.00 $321,136.00 $403,968.00 C. No water connection charge shall be levied for connections to water mains installed pursuant to Local Improvement District Nos. 115, 146 and 152 by properties which participated in the establishment of said local improvement districts. [Ord. 3883 § 1 (Att. A), 2012; Ord. 3339 § 3, 2000]. The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code are current through Ordinance 4061, passed March 23, 2017. Packet Pg. 425 Edmonds Chapter 7.30 WATER RATES AND SEWER CHARGES Page 12/18 7.30.036 Sewer special connection districts. A. A connection charge shall be paid by each new customer connecting to the city's sewer system within the following described district(s). This special connection charge is based upon the actual cost of constructing improvements which relate directly and exclusively to homes within the district(s) and which are, because of the special nature of the construction, separate and distinct from the overall costs of the system paid by a customer pursuant to ECC 7.30.035. These charges shall be in addition to the charges paid by a new customer pursuant to ECC 7.30.035 and do not duplicate any costs contained in the underlying sewer utility connection charge. B. 88th Avenue West Sewer Special Connection District. 1. Properties addressed as 21903, 21904, and 21911 88th Avenue West shown on Exhibit A attached to the ordinance codified in this section maintained on file in the city clerk's office and any subdivision, lot line adjustment or reconfiguration of the lots or the property represented by such addresses shall pay a special connection fee, to be paid in full at the time of connection to the sewer system, of $2,941.39 per lot. 2. Due to the significant additional sewer system construction that will be required at the property owners' expense to connect these properties to the sewer system after completion of the sewer project by the city, these properties may defer connection and shall not be required to connect to the sewer system within the time limit requirements of ECDC 18.10.010 and ECC 7.30.040. 3. The owner of any of these properties that does not connect to the sewer system within the time limits in accordance with ECDC 18.10.010 shall, upon connection to the sewer system, pay the above established special connection fee, increased based upon the Department of Labor Bureau of Labor Statistics Consumer Price Index for construction for the Seattle -Bellevue -Everett area from the effective date of the ordinance codified in this section to the time of connection to the sewer system. C. Olympic View Drive Sewer Special Connection Districts. 1. Properties legally described, addressed and identified on the attached Exhibit A (maintained on file in the city clerk's office) as 7101, 7109, 7115, 7327, and 7333 Olympic View Drive, and 7530 184th Place SW/Olympic View Drive, or any subdivision, lot line adjustment, reconfiguration, or modification (including but not limited to legal description, address and other identification) of the lots or the property represented by those addresses shall pay, in addition to other connection charges and/or permit fees required by ordinance and/or resolution, a special connection fee, to be paid in full at the time of initial connection to the sewer laterals constructed in Olympic View Drive as identified on sheets 72-78 of the city of Lynnwood's construction drawings for the Olympic View Drive Phase 2 — 76th Ave W to 178th Place SW, as follows: Special Address Connection Fee 7101 Olympic View Drive $4,015.85 7109 Olympic View Drive $3,720.56 7115 Olympic View Drive $3,569.45 7327 Olympic View Drive $3,009.26 7333 Olympic View Drive $2,939.29 7530 184th Place SW $3,798.31 Upon declaration by the city that the aforementioned sewer laterals constructed in Olympic View Drive are operational, the properties in Exhibit A shall connect to the sewer system in accordance with the requirements of ECDC 18.10.010 and ECC 7.30.040; provided, that a four -month extension to connect shall be granted to any of said properties that is developed upon payment, before the expiration of the time limit to connect set forth in ECDC 18.10.010, of one-third of the respective special connection fee charged above. The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code are current through Ordinance 4061, passed March 23, 2017. Packet Pg. 426 Edmonds Chapter 7.30 WATER RATES AND SEWER CHARGES Page 13/18 Any of said properties that is undeveloped at the time the sewer laterals are declared operational shall be allowed to defer connection to the public sewer system until the time when the property is developed. The owner of a property with deferred connection shall pay, upon initial connection to sewer laterals in Olympic View Drive, the special connection fee as set forth above, increased by a cumulative multiple, to the extent permitted under RCW 35.92.025, equal to the Department of Labor Bureau of Labor Statistics Consumer Price Index for construction for the Seattle -Bellevue -Everett area from the expiration of the time limits to connect set forth in ECDC 18.10.010, which would then have applied had the property not been undeveloped, to the time of initial connection. 2. Properties legally described, addressed and identified on the attached Exhibit B (maintained on file in the city clerk's office) as 17632, 17708, 17626, 17806, 17810, 17910, and certain unaddressed property located between 17810 and 17910 Olympic View Drive and any subdivision, lot line adjustment, reconfiguration, or modification (including but not limited to legal description, address and other identification) of the lots or the property represented by such addresses shall pay, in addition to other connection charges and/or permit fees required by ordinance and/or resolution, a special connection fee, to be paid in full at the time of initial connection to the public sewer manhole and stub pipe located at the northwest corner of 180th St. SW and Olympic View Drive as identified on sheet 60 of the city of Lynnwood's construction drawings for the Olympic View Drive Phase 1 — 178th Place SW to 168th St. SW (public sewer manhole), of $4,932.85 per lot. Due to the significant additional sewer system construction that will be required at the property owners' expense to connect to the above referenced public sewer manhole and stub pipe, the properties in Exhibit B, regardless of whether they are developed or not, may, notwithstanding the requirements of ECDC 18.10.010 and ECC 7.30.040, defer connection to the same. The owner of a property that defers connection shall pay, upon initial connection to the public sewer manhole and stub pipe, the above established special connection fee, increased by a cumulative multiple, to the extent permitted under RCW 35.92.025, equal to the Department of Labor Bureau of Labor Statistics Consumer Price Index for construction for the Seattle -Bellevue -Everett area from the expiration of the time limits to connect set forth in ECDC 18.10.010 to the time of connection; provided, that if the property with deferred connection was undeveloped when the public sewer manhole and stub pipe were declared operational by the city, its owner shall pay, upon initial connection to the same, the above established special connection fee, increased to the extent permitted under RCW 35.92.025 by the aforementioned index from the expiration of the time limits to connect set forth in ECDC 18.10.010, which would then have applied had the property not been undeveloped, to the time of connection. [Ord. 3777 § 1, 2010; Ord. 3657 § 1, 2007]. 7.30.040 Utility charges — Sanitary sewer. The utility charges for sanitary sewer service set forth in this section shall be added to and made a part of the bimonthly or monthly rates for water supplied through the meters as set forth in ECC 7.30.030: A. The following rates shall be charged on all billings after the effective date shown with respect to the following customers and/or service: Current 1/1/2017 1/1/2018 1/1/2019 Single-family residence (bimonthly per unit) Connected $66.49 $72.81 $79.72 $87.30 Unconnected $10.74 $11.76 $12.88 $14.10 Duplex, apartment houses, condos, and other multiunit residences (bimonthly per unit) Connected $53.42 $58.49 $64.05 $70.14 Unconnected $10.74 $11.76 $12.88 $14.10 Duplex, apartment houses, condos, and other multiunit residences (monthly) Connected $26.71 $29.25 $32.03 $35.07 The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code are current through Ordinance 4061, passed March 23, 2017. Packet Pg. 427 Edmonds Chapter 7.30 WATER RATES AND SEWER CHARGES Current 1/1/2017 Unconnected $5.37 $5.88 All other customers (monthly) Fixed rate Volume charge (per ccf)* *per 100 cubic feet (1 unit) of metered water consumption Page 14/18 1/1/2018 1/1/2019 $6.44 $7.05 $3.78 $4.14 $4.53 $4.96 $4.28 $4.69 $5.13 $5.62 B. For customers who are not served by city waterlines but who are connected to city sewers, the charges shall be the same as set forth in subsection A of this section and its subparagraphs. C. These rates do not apply to industries or manufacturing concerns which have industrial wastes. These, together with other activities not covered in this chapter, shall be dealt with on a special basis and have special rates set for the particular business by the water/utility administrative staff, subject to review and approval by the city council. D. All property owners within an area served by a sanitary sewer system in the city of Edmonds are hereby directed and compelled to connect their private drains and sewers to the city system. Failure to do so within 30 days of written notice to connect by the city shall subject the property owner to a monthly penalty equal to that charge imposed by subsections A, B, and/or C above. Said penalty shall be billed to the property owner, and they shall be subject to payment, collection and enforcement in all respects as though they were utility customers of the city. All penalties collected shall be considered revenues of the sewer utility system. [Ord. 4052 § 2, 2016; Ord. 3945 § 2, 2013; Ord. 3570 § 2, 2005; Ord. 3400 § 2, 2002; Ord. 3339 § 4, 2000; Ord. 3195 § 1, 1998; Ord. 2823, 1991; Ord. 2657 § 2, 1988; Ord. 2551, 1986; Ord. 2361 § 2, 1983; Ord. 2255 § 2, 1981; Ord. 2197 § 2, 1981; Ord. 2181 § 1, 1980; Ord. 2147, 1980; Ord. 2139, 1980; Ord. 1898 § 2, 1977; Ord. 1465, 1970; Ord. 1458 § 1, 1970; Ord. 1264 § 1, 1967; Ord. 1051, 1964; Ord. 786 § 3, 1959]. 7.30.045 Special connection charge. In addition to any other charges prescribed by this chapter, a special connection charge shall be paid by the owner of any property, residential dwelling unit, or other structure that may hereafter connect to the sanitary sewer improvements constructed by any local improvement district formed by the city and for which no assessment was imposed or charged under the said LID. The special connection charge for each property, residential dwelling unit, or other structure so connected shall be equal to the amount of the assessment that would have been levied against such property, residential dwelling unit, or structure under the final assessment roll of the appropriate LID if the said property, residential dwelling unit, or other structure had been so assessed, together with interest thereon at the rate established by the ordinance authorizing issuance of the bonds for said LID, from the time of such authorization until the time of connection. The special connection charge shall be paid in a lump sum prior to connection to the sanitary sewer. The special connection charge provided for in this section shall apply only where the debt used to finance the local improvements has not yet been fully retired through assessment payments. If such debt has been fully retired through payment of such assessments, the special connection charge shall not apply. [Ord. 3332 § 1, 2000]. 7.30.050 Unauthorized use of water. It is unlawful for any person, firm, corporation, or other organization of any type whatsoever to take, or allow to be taken, water from the Edmonds water system without a valid per- mit issued by the Edmonds water division. Any person, including the officers and/or directors of any firm, corporation or other organization of any type, who shall take water from the Edmonds water system without such permit shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and subject to the penalties set forth in ECC 5.50.020. In addition to such penalties there shall be a charge by the water division for the taking of such water at a minimum of $100.00 plus $1.00 per 100 cubic feet of water taken. Said water charge may be charged against the premises from which the water was taken and enforced by available liens or, where applicable, against the individual, firm, corporation or other organization of any type, including the officers and directors thereof, who took or caused to be taken said unauthorized water. References herein to water permits shall include all permits required for water usage within the city of Edmonds, or from the Edmonds water system, as required by the Edmonds City Code. [Ord. 1562, 1971]. The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code are current through Ordinance 4061, passed March 23, 2017. Packet Pg. 428 Edmonds Page 15/18 Chapter 7.30 WATER RATES AND SEWER CHARGES 7.30.060 Severability. Should any section, clause or provision of this chapter be declared by the courts to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the chapter as a whole or any part thereof, other than the part so declared to be invalid. [Ord. 786 § 6, 1959]. 7.30.070 Water, sewer and stormwater rate reductions for low income citizens. A. Definitions. For the purposes of implementing water, sewer and stormwater rate reductions under the provisions of this section, the following words or phrases shall have the following definitions: 1. "Low income citizen" shall mean a person who has established Edmonds as their residence and whose total disposable income including that of his or her spouse or cotenant does not exceed the amount specified in RCW 84.36.381(5)(b) as the same exists or is hereafter amended. 2. The definition of terms such as "residence," "total disposable income," "combined disposable income," and other such terms used in this section shall be given those meanings established by RCW 84.36.383 as the same exists or is hereafter amended. In the event that any provision of the Revised Code of Washington incorporated by reference or implication in this definitional section shall be amended, such amendment shall be deemed to be incorporated within or utilized in interpretation of this section. B. Low income citizens shall be given reductions in the water, sewer and stormwater rates as those rates are established from time to time by the city council: 1. A rate reduction of 30 percent shall be afforded those low income citizens who meet the qualifying income and asset levels established by RCW 84.36.381(5)(b)(i) as the same exists or shall hereafter be amended. 2. A 50 percent rate reduction shall be afforded those low income citizens qualifying under the provisions of RCW 84.36.381 (5)(b)(ii). 3. No rate reduction shall be afforded to any person shown as a dependent on the income tax return of any other individual, whether or not such person resides at the location for which the rate reduction is sought, unless the total combined disposable income of the applicant, along with their spouse, cotenant and all family members shown on the income tax return in which the applicant is shown as a dependent, meets the standards established by this section. C. The administrative services director is authorized to establish an application for low income citizens rate reduction applications. The application shall be provided without cost by the utility billing division of the city and shall include such information as may reasonably be required by the administrative services director to verify eligibility. [Ord. 3629 § 9, 2007; Ord. 2807 § 1, 1990; Ord. 2805 § 2, 1990; Ord. 2777 § 1, 1990]. 7.30.080 Reserved. [Ord. 2777 § 2, 1990; Ord. 2773 § 1, 1990; Ord. 2440, 1984; Ord. 2198 § 2, 1981]. 7.30.090 Penalties. A. Any person knowingly making any false or misleading statement in any application and/or renewal for rate reduction to any city employee with intent to secure the rate reduction authorized herein shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and punished as set forth in ECC 5.50.020. B. Further, in the event of any such misrepresentation, the water rate may be increased retroactively and assessed against the applicant and/or premises as may be allowable by law including but not limited to lien procedures. [Ord. 2198 § 3, 1981]. The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code are current through Ordinance 4061, passed March 23, 2017. Packet Pg. 429 Edmonds Chapter 7.40 FIRE PROTECTION WATER SERVICE Chapter 7.40 FIRE PROTECTION WATER SERVICE Sections: 7.40.010 Application — Information. 7.40.020 Ownership and costs. 7.40.030 Fire service to be metered — Second service to premises. 7.40.040 Fire service monthly service charges. 7.40.050 Violation — Penalty. Page 16/18 7.40.010 Application — Information. Water shall be supplied for fire protection purposes only after application has been made by the customer or his agent and approved by the water division and fire department. Sufficient information shall be supplied at the time of making application for service to enable the water division to fully determine the nature and extent of the proposed system. Detailed drawings of the proposed system shall be provided, which shall contain adequate information showing the locations and sizes of the system's piping and appurtenances. [Ord. 1561, 1971]. 7.40.020 Ownership and costs. All fire service connections shall be installed by and remain the property of the water division. The expense for all labor, materials and equipment rental, including street restoration required for tapping mains, making connections, placing valves, meters, or any other protective device deemed necessary by the water division to prevent the unauthorized use of water, including the testing of completed work, meter pits and/or vaults, shall be paid for by the customer. [Ord. 1561, 1971]. 7.40.030 Fire service to be metered — Second service to premises. Fire service connections shall be supplied only through an approved fire service meter or a detector check meter. In the case of premises for which both fire protection and other water service for such uses as domestic, commercial, industrial, or manufacturing purposes is supplied, there may be two service installations made to the premises: one for fire service only and one for other water service. These service functions may also be combined in a single service connection with the approval of the water division. In the event two separate service connections are installed, the fire protection system so served shall consist of an automatic sprinkler system only, without additional outlets which could normally be used for other than fire suppression purposes. [Ord. 1561, 1971]. 7.40.040 Fire service monthly service charges. A. The monthly rates for inspection and maintenance of detector check systems are fixed as follows: Fire Service or Detector Meter Size Up to 4" 6" 8" Bimonthly Service Charge $12.34 $21.59 $30.81 Water used through the fire service line for fire suppression purposes and limited testing of the system will normally be furnished without any charge in addition to the bimonthly minimum charge set forth for fire service meter or detector check meter. B. If a detector check meter proves, or proof is otherwise provided, leakage or unauthorized usage of water which is not for fire suppression purposes, the customer shall pay for all water used at the applicable metered rate. The rates for water so used are fixed as follows: at the time of first written notice from the city water division the applicable rate shall be the same as the domestic rate for comparable size of domestic water meter for unauthorized use over 100 cubic feet per month; in the event the unauthorized use again occurs after the period of time specified in the The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code are current through Ordinance 4061, passed March 23, 2017. Packet Pg. 430 Edmonds Chapter 7.40 FIRE PROTECTION WATER SERVICE Page 17/18 written notice from the water division, the rate shall be double the domestic rate for a comparable size domestic water for such unauthorized use over 100 cubic feet per month. C. References made by this chapter as to existing metered rates shall be to Chapter 7.30 ECC. [Ord. 3629 § 10, 2007; Ord. 3457 § 1, 2003; Ord. 1561, 1971]. 7.40.050 Violation — Penalty. In addition to all civil rights of collection, liens, shut -offs and other remedies available to the city of Edmonds as prescribed by statute and ordinance for unauthorized use and/or nonpayment of charges, any person, firm, corporation or other organization, including any officers, directors and managers thereof, who violate any provision of this chapter shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and subject to penalties as set forth in ECC 5.50.020. [Ord. 1561, 1971]. The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code are current through Ordinance 4061, passed March 23, 2017. Packet Pg. 431 Edmonds Chapter 7.60 COMBINED UTILITY Chapter 7.60 COMBINED UTILITY Sections: 7.60.010 Combination of combined water and sewer utility and stormwater management utility. 7.60.020 Separate rates — Accountability. 7.60.030 Utility assistance fund. Page 18/18 7.60.010 Combination of combined water and sewer utility and stormwater management utility. The city is maintaining and operating a combined water supply and distribution system and sanitary sewage disposal system and, by Chapter 7.50 ECC, has created a stormwater management utility. Pursuant to the provisions of RCW 35.67.331, the present combined water and sewer utility, and the stormwater management utility, together with all additions, extensions and betterments thereof at any time made, are hereby combined into a single utility; provided, that the accounting procedure for each system shall be kept separate as required by RCW 35.37.010. The combined water, sewer and stormwater management utility of the city, together with all additions, extensions and betterments thereof at any time made, shall hereinafter be called the "combined utility." 7.60.020 Separate rates — Accountability. The council declares its intent to establish rates for the combined water and sewer utility and stormwater management utility. In order to better account for the costs of the respective components of the combined utility, the administrative services director is directed to maintain such separate funds and accounting structures as may be necessary to discretely account for the costs, expenses and revenues of each component utility. When the staff makes recommendations for the establishment, increase or decrease in any rate, it is directed to provide supporting data which separately reflects such costs, expenses and revenues for each component utility. 7.60.030 Utility assistance fund. A. Purpose. The city council establishes the utility assistance fund in order to accept, hold and dispense funds contributed either from the city's general fund, from charitable and civic organizations or from individual rate -payers who have made donations for the assistance of a category of citizens known under Article 8, Section 7 of the Washington State Constitution as the "poor and infirm" and under other provisions of other state statutes and local ordinance as the low-income, elderly and disabled. B. Disbursement. Such monies as are contributed shall be held and disbursed to persons qualifying for the assistance programs established by ECC 7.30.070 and the provisions of state law incorporated in that section. Disbursements may be made, to the extent of monies held within the fund, for utility charges, connection fees, and other exactments levied by the utilities which, taken as whole, constitute the combined utility. The monies may be expended for purposes which generally benefit the public health, safety and welfare or are designated by the donor of the fund. C. The administrative services director or his/her designee is hereby authorized to adopt forms and procedures for the acceptance of contributions to the fund and for the disbursement of monies from the fund. [Ord. 3393 § 1, 2002]. The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code are current through Ordinance 4061, passed March 23, 2017. Packet Pg. 432 8.A.a ti r N d d V C O Q ti r O N d C 7 7 C fC d E O r N Cn L O E W r :.i APPENDIX M Packet Pg. 433 8.A.a E a� THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK L .N C d L L Q E O U r O N O C O O C N N d L Q. Q Packet Pg. 434 8.A.a Agency Review Comments To be provided prior to final Plan adoption. Packet Pg. 435 8.A.a E a� THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK L .N C d L L Q O U r O N O C O O C N N d L Q. Q Packet Pg. 436 8.A.a Q Packet Pg. 437 8.A.a murraysmilh www.murraysmith.us TACOMA / EVERETT / SEATTLE / VANCOUVER / SPOKANE / PORTLAND / EUGENE / BOISE Packet Pg. 438 8.6 Planning Board Agenda Item Meeting Date: 06/28/2017 Review of Draft Planned Action Code Language Staff Lead: Shane Hope Department: Planning Division Prepared By: Diane Cunningham Background/History "Planned actions" are an option for local governments under the state Growth Management Act (GMA) and State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). A planned action provides for development projects, for which impacts have been addressed by an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) in association with a plan for a specific geographic area, to not be subject to additional SEPA review. Of course, any such projects would still be subject to all other regulations and laws. Edmonds had not previously used the planned action option. Recently, the city's first Planned Action EIS, which focuses on the Highway 99 area, was drafted and is within the public review time frame. (The draft may be viewed online at: http://www.edmondshwy99.org/planned-action-eis.) A final EIS will be issued later this summer. After completion of the final EIS, the City may adopt the Highway 99 Subarea Plan, related development regulations, and a "planned action" ordinance. The planned action ordinance is intended to describe the parameters by which development projects can be covered under a relevant EIS, instead of needing separate SEPA review. (Of course, a project with impacts that don't fit under the EIS can still be required to undergo additional SEPA review.) Staff Recommendation Review the information and ask any questions Narrative A draft Planned Action Ordinance for the Highway 99 Area, based on the draft EIS for the Highway 99 Subarea Plan, has been prepared. (See Attachment 1.) Some aspects of the draft ordinance will be filled in or revised later, after the Highway 99 Area EIS process is complete. This will include information on "pm peak hour trips" (a congestion measure) and any changes to reflect the final EIS analysis for the number of square feet of building area and the number of dwelling units. In addition, Appendix B of the Planned Action Ordinance will be completed to include a summary of mitigation measures. Section 5 of the draft Planned Action Ordinance states that the City will monitor the progress of development in the Highway 99 subarea and review the Planned Action Ordinance within five years of its effective date. This review is to result in a report from the City's SEPA official about whether to propose amendments to the Planned Action Ordinance and whether to supplment or revise the underlying EIS. The Planning Board's June 28 review of the draft Planned Action Ordinance is a chance to review basic Packet Pg. 439 8.6 concepts and ask any questions. After the June 28 meeting, next steps include: d Continuation of the SEPA process for the Highway 99 Subarea Plan d Possible revisions/corrections to the draft Planned Action Ordinance 6 July 12 public hearing by the Planning Board on the proposed Planned Action Ordinance and a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council will then consider the Planning Board's recommendation in public meetings during July and August. The full set of proposed Highway 99 Subarea documents (Subarea Plan, development regulation amendments, and planned action ordinance) is scheduled for Council action on August 15. Attachments: Att. 1: HWY99 PAO DRAFT.06.22.17 Packet Pg. 440 8.B.a JUNE 2017 - DRAFT ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Edmonds, Washington, establishing a Planned Action for the Highway 99 Subarea, pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act WHEREAS, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) and implementing rules provide for the integration of environmental review with land use planning and project review through designation of Planned Actions by jurisdictions planning under the Growth Management Act "GMA); and v WHEREAS, the City has adopted a Comprehensive Plan complying with the GMA; and o WHEREAS, the City has adopted development regulations providing for planned actions; r U Q WHEREAS, the City has prepared a subarea plan and development regulations for the Highway 99 Subarea; and M a WHEREAS, designation of a Planned Action expedites the permitting process for subsequent, implementing projects whose impacts have been previously addressed in a Planned Action environmental impact statement (EIS), and thereby encourages desired growth and o 3 economic development; and WHEREAS, the Highway 99 Planned Action EIS identifies impacts and mitigation a� measures associated with planned development in the subarea; and ti WHEREAS, the City has adopted development regulations which will help protect the v environment, and is adopting zoning regulations specific to the sub -area which will guide the amount, location, form, and quality of desired development; N Vi co 0 WHEREAS, the Highway 99 Subarea is deemed to be appropriate for designation of a Planned Action; LL < WHEREAS, the Edmonds Planning Board held an open record public hearing on May 10, 0 O 2017 to consider Highway 99 Subarea development regulations and on July 12, 2017 to consider Q a the proposed planned action ordinance; rn WHEREAS, the Edmonds City Council held an open record public hearing on June 20, 2017 to consider Highway 99 Subarea development regulations and on August 1, 2017, to = consider the proposed planned action ordinance; Q NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY r ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: c SECTION 1. Recitals. The Recitals set forth above are hereby adopted and incorporated .r by reference. The City Council bases its findings and conclusions on the entire record of Q testimony and exhibits, including all written and oral testimony before the Planning Board and City Council. SECTION 2. Purpose. The City Council declares that the purpose of this ordinance is to: Highway 99 Subarea Plan — Planned Action Ordinance Packet Pg. 441 8.B.a JUNE 2017 - DRAFT A. Combine analysis of environmental impacts with the City's development of plans and regulations; B. Designate the Highway 99 Subarea as a Planned Action for purposes of environmental review and permitting of subsequent, implementing projects pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), RCW 43.21C.031; C. Determine that the EIS prepared for the sub -area plan meets the requirements of a m 3 Planned Action EIS pursuant to SEPA; D. Establish criteria and procedures, consistent with state law, that will determine c� J whether subsequent, implementing projects qualify as Planned Actions; G U E. Provide the public with information about planned actions and how the City will process applications for implementing projects; ro U Q F. Streamline and expedite the land use review and approval process for qualifying c projects by relying on the EIS completed for the Planned Action; and a G. Apply the City's development regulations together with the mitigation measures described in the Planned Action EIS and this Ordinance to address the impacts of future o development contemplated by the Planned Action. o 3 SECTION 3. Findings. The City Council finds as follows: A. The City is subject to the requirements of the Growth Management Act, RCW 36.70A, W and is located within an Urban Growth Area; ti B. The City has adopted a Comprehensive Plan complying with the GMA, and is N amending the Comprehensive Plan to incorporate a subarea element specific to the Highway 99 ti Subarea; N C' co 0 C. The City is adopting development regulations to implement the Highway 99 Subarea LL Plan to implement said Plan; 0 D. The City has prepared an EIS for the Highway 99 subarea (Planned Action EIS) and O finds that this EIS adequately addresses the probable significant environmental impacts a associated with the type and amount of development planned to occur in the designated Planned Action area; E. The mitigation measures identified in the Planned Action EIS and attached to this x ordinance as Exhibit B, together with adopted City development regulations, will adequately mitigate significant impacts from development within the Planned Action area; a r F. The Subarea Plan and Planned Action EIS identify the location, type and amount of c m E development that is contemplated by the Planned Action; G. Future projects that are implemented consistent with the Planned Action will protect Q the environment, benefit the public and enhance economic development; Highway 99 Subarea Plan — Planned Action Ordinance Packet Pg. 442 8.B.a JUNE 2017 - DRAFT H. The City has provided numerous opportunities for meaningful public involvement in the proposed Planned Action; has considered all comments received; and, as appropriate, has modified the proposal or mitigation measures in response to comments; I. The Highway 99 Subarea Plan is not an essential public facility as defined by RCW 36.70A.200(1), and any future projects which meet the definition of an essential public facility will not qualify as Planned Actions; J. The Planned Action applies to a defined area that is smaller than the overall City boundaries; and K. Public services and facilities are adequate to serve the proposed Planned Action, with implementation of mitigation measures identified in the EIS. SECTION 4. Procedures and Criteria for Evaluating and Determining Projects as Planned Actions. A. Planned Action Area. The Planned Action designation shall apply to the area shown in Exhibit A. B. Environmental Document. A Planned Action determination for a site -specific o implementing project application shall be based on the environmental analysis contained in the o Draft EIS issued by the City on June 2, 2017, and the Final EIS published on . The Draft and Final EISs shall comprise the Planned Action EIS. The mitigation measures contained in > Exhibit B are based upon the findings of the Planned Action EIS and shall, along with adopted City regulations, provide the framework that the City will use to impose appropriate conditions i on qualifying Planned Action projects. `= ti C. Planned Action Designated. Land uses and activities described in the Planned Action N EIS, subject to the thresholds described in subsection ID and the mitigation measures N contained in Exhibit B, are designated Planned Actions or Planned Action Projects pursuant to RCW 43.21C.031. A development application for a site -specific Planned Action project located within the Highway 99 Subarea Planned Action Area shall be designated as a Planned Action if it o meets the criteria set forth in subsection ID of this ordinance and applicable laws, codes, a development regulations and standards of the City. a- a� D. Planned Action Qualifications. The following thresholds shall be used to determine if a site -specific development proposed within the Highway 99 Planned Action Area is contemplated by the Planned Action and has had its environmental impacts evaluated in the Planned Action EIS: a (1) Land Use. The following general categories/types of land uses, which are permitted or conditionally permitted in zoning districts applicable to the Highway 99 E Planned Action Area, and subject to any limitations in size contained in the applicable zoning districts, are considered Planned Actions: Anticipated land uses are further Q identified below: (a) Multiple dwellings; (b) Office uses, including but not limited to medical office; Highway 99 Subarea Plan — Planned Action Ordinance 3 Packet Pg. 443 JUNE 2017 - DRAFT 8.B.a (c) Retail and service uses; (d) Medical and health care uses; (e) Mixed use development (e) Utilities and capital facilities. Individual land uses considered to be Planned Actions shall include those uses specifically listed in development regulations applicable to the zoning classifications applied to properties within the Planned Action Area. (2) Development Thresholds. a) The following amount of various new land uses are contemplated by the Planned Action: Land Use Development Amount Non-residential uses, including 1,634,685 square feet of building office, retail, service and area medical/health care uses Residential 3,325 dwelling units (b) If future development proposals in the Highway 99 Planned Action Area exceed the development thresholds specified in this ordinance, further environmental review may be required pursuant to WAC 197-11-172. Furthermore, if proposed development would alter the assumptions and analysis in the Planned Action EIS, further environmental review may be required. Shifting the development amount between categories of uses may be permitted so long as the total build -out does not exceed the aggregate amount of development and trip generation reviewed in the EIS, and so long as the impacts of that development have been identified in the Planned Action EIS and are mitigated consistent with Exhibit B. (c). Building Heights. Building heights shall be as established in the applicable zoning classification and as evaluated in the Planned Action EIS. (3) Transportation. (a) Trip Ranges & Thresholds. The Planned Action EIS analyzed and identified mitigation for X,XXX new pm peak hour trips in the Planned Action area. Uses or activities that would exceed these maximum trip levels will require additional SEPA review. Highway 99 Subarea Plan — Planned Action Ordinance 4 Packet Pg. 444 8.B.a JUNE 2017 - DRAFT (b) Concurrency. The determination of transportation impacts shall be based on the City's concurrency management program and the level of service standards copted in the Comprehensive Plan. (c) Traffic Impact Mitigation. All planned action projects shall pay, as a condition of approval, their proportionate share of local street improvements according to the schedule in Edmonds City Code 3.36.125. Impact fees will be determined according to the methodology contained in Chapter 3.36. (d) Director Discretion. The Development Services Director, in consultation with the City c —J Engineer, shall have discretion to determine incremental and total trip generation, consistent c with the Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual (latest edition) or an v alternative manual accepted by the Director at his or her sole discretion, for each project permit c r application proposed under this Planned Action. Q (4) Elements of the Environment and Degree of Impacts. A proposed project that would c result in a significant change in the type or degree of impacts to any of the elements of the c environment analyzed in the Planned Action EIS, would not qualify as a Planned Action. a $ L (5) Changed Conditions. Should environmental conditions change significantly from o those analyzed in the Planned Action EIS, the City's SEPA Responsible Official may determine G that the Planned Action designation is no longer applicable until supplemental environmental m review is conducted. E. Planned Action Review Criteria. ti (1) The City's SEPA Responsible Official may designate as planned actions, pursuant to `= RCW 43.21C.030, applications that meet all of the following conditions: N (a) the proposal is located within the Planned Action area identified in Exhibit A of this N ordinance; U- (b) the proposed uses and activities are consistent with those described in the Planned Action EIS and Section 4.D of this ordinance; O (c) the proposal is within the Planned Action thresholds and other criteria of Section 3.D a of this ordinance; a� a, (d) the proposal is consistent with the City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan and the x Highway 99 Subarea Plan; (e) the proposal's significant adverse environmental impacts have been identified in the a Planned Action EIS; (f) the proposal's significant impacts have been mitigated by application of the m measures identified in Exhibit B, and other applicable city regulations, together with any modifications or variances or special permits that may be required; Q (g) the proposal complies with all applicable local, state and/or federal laws and regulations, and the Responsible Official determines that these constitute adequate mitigation; and Highway 99 Subarea Plan — Planned Action Ordinance 5 Packet Pg. 445 8.B.a JUNE 2017 - DRAFT (h) the proposal is not an essential public facility as defined by RCW 36.70A.200(1). (2) The City shall base its decision on review of a SEPA checklist, or an alternative form approved by the Department of Ecology, and review of the application and supporting documentation. (3) A proposal that meets the criteria of this section shall be considered to qualify and be designated as a Planned Action, consistent with the requirements or RCW 43.21C.030, WAC 197-11-164 et seq, and this ordinance. F. Effect of Planned Action (1) Designation as a Planned Action project means that a qualifying proposal has been reviewed in accordance with this ordinance and found to be consistent with its development parameters and thresholds, and with the environmental analysis contained in the Planned Action EIS. (2) Upon determination by the City's SEPA Responsible Official that the proposal meets the criteria of Section 3.D and qualifies as a Planned Action, the proposal shall not require a o SEPA threshold determination, preparation of an EIS, or be subject to further review pursuant to 0 SEPA. 3 m G. Planned Action Permit Process. Applications for Planned Actions shall be reviewed pursuant to the following process. ti (1) Development applications shall meet all applicable requirements of the Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code. Applications for Planned Actions shall be made on forms provided by the City and shall include a SEPA checklist, or an approved Planned Action N checklist. 0 t- (2) The City's Director of Development Services or designee shall determine whether the a application is complete as provided in Edmonds City Code 20.02.003. p (3) If the application is for a project within the Planned Action Area defined in Exhibit A, a the application will be reviewed to determine if it is consistent with the criteria of this ordinance a- a� and thereby qualifies as a Planned Action project. The SEPA Responsible Official shall notify the applicant of his/her decision. If the project is determined to qualify as a Planned Action, it shall x proceed in accordance with the applicable permit review procedures specified in Edmonds City Code Chapter 20.02, except that no SEPA threshold determination, EIS or additional SEPA review a shall be required. The decision of the SEPA Responsible Official regarding qualification as a c Planned Action shall be final. E (4) Public notice and review for projects that qualify as Planned Actions shall be tied to the underlying permit and shall follow the procedures set forth in Edmonds City Code Chapter Q 20.03. If notice is otherwise required for the underlying permit, the notice shall state that the project has qualified as a Planned Action. If notice is not otherwise required for the underlying permit, no special notice is required by this ordinance. Highway 99 Subarea Plan — Planned Action Ordinance Packet Pg. 446 JUNE 2017 - DRAFT 8.B.a (5) If a project is determined to not qualify as a Planned Action, the SEPA Responsible Official shall so notify the applicant and prescribe a SEPA review procedure consistent with the City's SEPA regulations and the requirements of state law. The notice shall describe the elements of the application that result in failure to qualify as a Planned Action. (6) Projects that fail to qualify as Planned Actions may incorporate or otherwise use relevant elements of the Planned Action EIS, as well as other relevant SEPA documents, to meet their SEPA requirements. The SEPA Responsible Official may limit the scope of SEPA review for the non -qualifying project to those issues and environmental impacts not previously addressed in the Planned Action EIS. SECTION 5. Monitoring and Review. A. The City shall monitor the progress of development in the designated Planned Action Sub -area to ensure that it is consistent with the assumptions of this ordinance and the Planned Action EIS regarding the type and amount of development and associated impacts, and with the mitigation measures and improvements planned for the Highway 99 Planned Action Area. B. This Planned Action Ordinance shall be reviewed no later than five years from its effective date by the SEPA Responsible Official to determine the continuing relevance of its assumptions and findings with respect to environmental conditions in the Planned Action area, the impacts of development, and required mitigation measures. Based upon this review, the City may propose amendments to this ordinance or may supplement or revise the Planned Action EIS. SECTION 6. Conflict. In the event of a conflict between this Ordinance or any mitigation measure imposed thereto, and any ordinance or regulation of the City, the provisions of this ordinance shall control EXCEPT that the provision of any International Code shall supersede. SECTION 7. Severability. Should any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance or its application be declared to be unconstitutional or invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the constitutionality or validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance or its application to any other person or situation. SECTION 8. Effective Date. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifically delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum, and shall take effect five (5) days after its passage, approval and publication as provided by law. APPROVED , MAYOR ATTEST: Highway 99 Subarea Plan — Planned Action Ordinance 7 a Packet Pg. 447 8.B.a JUNE 2017 - DRAFT APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY PASSED _ day of 2017 APPROVED _ day of .2017 PUBLISHED _ day of 2017 I hereby certify that this is a true copy of Ordinance No. passed by the City Council of the City of Edmonds, Washington, and approved by the Mayor of the City of Edmonds as hereon indicated. CITY CLERK Highway 99 Subarea Plan — Planned Action Ordinance 8 Packet Pg. 448 JUNE 2017 - DRAFT 8.B.a EXHIBIT A PLANNED ACTION AREA UOTH Si 5W --------------------- ESPERANCE #+ 28TH S�rSW 230TH SP ,SW TFf ST $4+! Highway 99 Subarea Plan — Planned Action Ordinance LYNNWOOD 1 4�aa; r MOUNTLAXE TERRACE r a R r f i r �t i 4 i a i 5 t i t t Q 9 Packet Pg. 449 8.B.a JUNE 2017 - DRAFT EXHIBIT B Highway 99 Subarea Plan PLANNED ACTION EIS MITIGATION DOCUMENT The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) requires environmental review for project and non - project proposals that may have adverse impacts on the environment. In order to meet SEPA requirements, the City of Edmonds issued the Draft Highway 99 Planned Action Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) on June 2, 2017 and the Final Highway 99 Planned Action EIS on XXXXX, 2017. The Draft and Final EIS are referenced collectively herein as the "EIS." The EIS has identified probably significant impacts that would occur with future development in the Planned Action area, together with a number of potential measures to mitigate those significant impacts. The purpose of this Mitigation Document is to establish specific mitigation measure for qualified planned action development proposals, based on significant impacts identified in the EIS. The mitigation measures would apply to future development proposals that are consistent with the planned action development envelope reviewed in the EIS and that are located within the Planned Action area (see Exhibit A). USE OF TERMS o 3 m Brief definitions of terms used in this Mitigation Document are provided below. SEPA Terms ti The discussion of mitigation measures may refer to the word's action, planned action or proposal and for reference, these terms are defined below: ti • "Action" means projects or programs financed, licensed, regulated, conducted or N W approved by an agency. "Project actions" involve decisions on a specific project such as a construction or management activity for a defined geographic area. "Non -project" u_ Q actions involve decisions about policies, plans or programs (WAC 197-11-704) 0 • "Planned Action" refers to types of project actions that are designated by ordinance for 0 Q a specific geographic area and addressed in an EIS in conjunction with a comprehensive a- a� plan or subarea plan, a fully contained community, a master planned resort, a master planned development or phased project (WAC 197-11-164). x • "Proposal" means a proposed action that may be an action or regulatory decision of an agency, or any action proposed by applicants (WAC 197-11-784) a r Other Terms m E The Planned Action area may be referred to as the Highway 99 Planned Action Area, Highway 99 Subarea, project area or project site in this document. a General Interpretation Where a mitigation measure includes the words "shall" or "will," inclusion of that measure is mandatory in order to qualify a project as a Planned Action. Where "should" or "would" appear, Highway 99 Subarea Plan — Planned Action Ordinance 10 Packet Pg. 450 8.B.a JUNE 2017 - DRAFT the mitigation measures may be considered by the project applicant as a source of additional mitigation, as feasible or necessary, to ensure that a project qualifies as a planned action and/or to reduce or avoid impacts. Unless stated specifically otherwise, the mitigation measures that require preparation of plans, conduct of studies, construction of improvements, conduct of maintenance activities, etc., are the responsibility of the applicant or designee to fund and/or perform. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED UNDER THE PLANNED ACTION The proposal reviewed in this EIS include designation of the Highway 99 Subarea (see Exhibit A) as a Planned Acton area for the purpose of SEPA compliance, pursuant to RCW 43.21C.440 and WAC 197-11-164, adoption of comprehensive plan amendments for the Highway 99 Subarea, and adoption of zoning code amendments addressing zoning classifications, design standards, parking standards. The planned action designation would encourage redevelopment in the Highway 99 Subarea to create increased housing choices and an attractive pedestrian -oriented streetscape, provide opportunities for medical services growth, provide for enhanced multi - modal mobility, and provide for a greater mix of uses in the subarea. Under this Planned Action, redevelopment would add about 3,013 new jobs and 3,325 new housing units through 2035. MITIGATION G 3 Based on the EIS, which are incorporated by reference, this Mitigation Document summarizes significant adverse environmental impacts that are anticipated to occur in conjunction with the W development of planned action projects. Mitigation measures, identified in the EIS, are reiterated here for inclusion in conjunction with proposed projects to mitigate related impacts N and to qualify as planned action projects. Consistency review under the Planned Action, site plan review, and other permit approvals will N be required for specific development actions proposed under the Planned Action designation c (WAC 197-11-172). Additional project conditions may be imposed on planned action projects Q based upon the analysis of the Planned Action in relationship to independent requirements of o the City, state or federal requirements or review criteria. 0 a Any applicant for a project within the planned action area may propose alternative mitigation a - measures, if appropriate and/or as a result of changed circumstance, in order to allow an M equivalent substitute mitigation for identified impacts. Such modifications would be evaluated by the City SEPA Responsible Official prior to any project approvals by the City. As permitted by WAC 197-11-660, there may be some adverse impacts that are unavoidable a because reasonable or feasible mitigation cannot be achieved for the Planned Action m The combination of regulations applicable to each element of the environment and mitigation E measures identified in the EIS and documented in this Mitigation Document that are applied to cc any planned action proposal will adequately mitigate all significant environmental impacts Q associated with planned action proposals, except for those impacts that are identified as significant unavoidable adverse impacts. Highway 99 Subarea Plan — Planned Action Ordinance 11 Packet Pg. 451 8.B.a JUNE 2017 - DRAFT Mitigation measures are provided below for each element of the environment considered in the EIS. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES The EIS identifies significant impacts, unavoidable adverse impacts, and mitigation measures for potential impacts associated with land use, plans and policies, aesthetics, transportation, and public services and utilities. Please refer to the Draft and Final EIS for complete text associated with each element of the environment. The following lists all mitigation measures applicable to impacts for each element of the environment. Land Use [insert final mms] Plans and Policies [insert final mms] Aesthetics [insert final mms] Transportation [insert final mms] Public Services and Utilities [insert final mms] Highway 99 Subarea Plan — Planned Action Ordinance 12 Packet Pg. 452 9.A Planning Board Agenda Item Meeting Date: 06/28/2017 Review of Extended Agenda Staff Lead: N/A Department: Planning Division Prepared By: Diane Cunningham Background/History N/A Staff Recommendation Review Extended Agenda Narrative Extended Agenda is attached Attachments: 06-28-2017 PB Extended Agenda Packet Pg. 453 OY F.➢M N PILANN 9 BOARD "nc. 1890 Extended Agenda June 28, 2017 Meeting Item TUNE 2017 9.A.a Items and Dates are subject to change June 28 1. Review of Proposed Planned Action Code Language 2. Presentation of 2017 Update to Water Comprehensive Plan 1 U LY 2017 July 12 1. Public Hearing on 2017 Update to Water Comprehensive Plan 2. Public Hearing on Proposed Planned Action Code Language July 26 AUGUST 2017 August 9 August 23 SEPTEMBER 2017 Sept. 13 Sept. 27 OCTOBER 2017 Oct. 11 Oct. 25 NOVEMBER 2017 Nov. 8 Nov. 22 DECEMBER 2017 Dec. 13 Dec. 27 r Q Packet Pg. 454 Items ana Dates are 9.A.a to change Pending 1. Community Development Code Re -Organization 2017 2. Neighborhood Center Plans and zoning implementation, including: ✓ Five Corners 3. Further Highway 99 Implementation, including: ✓ Potential for "urban center" or transit -oriented design/development strategies ✓ Parking standards 4. Exploration of incentive zoning and incentives for sustainable development Current Priorities 1. Neighborhood Center Plans & implementation. 2. Highway 99 Implementation. Recurring 1. Annual Adult Entertainment Report (January -February as necessary) Topics 2. Election of Officers (VY meeting in December) 3. Parks & Recreation Department Quarterly Report (January, April, July, October) 4. Quarterly report on wireless facilities code updates (as necessary) Packet Pg. 455