2017-10-25 Planning Board Packet�1 o� NJI Agenda
Edmonds Planning Board
"" Ixyo COUNCIL CHAMBERS
250 5TH AVE NORTH, EDMONDS, WA 98020
OCTOBER 25, 2017, 7:00 PM
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. Approval of Draft Minutes of October 11, 2017
3. ANNOUNCEMENT OF AGENDA
4. AUDIENCE COMMENTS
5. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS
A. Development Services Director Report
B. Five Corners Area -Development Feasibility Analysis
6. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Public Hearing on the Proposed 2018 - 2023 Capital Facilities Plan / Capital Improvement Plans
7. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
8. NEW BUSINESS
9. PLANNING BOARD EXTENDED AGENDA
A. Planning Board Extended Agenda
10. PLANNING BOARD CHAIR COMMENTS
11. PLANNING BOARD MEMBER COMMENTS
12. ADJOURNMENT
Edmonds Planning Board Agenda
October 25, 2017
Page 1
2.A
Planning Board Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 10/25/2017
Approval of Draft Minutes of October 11, 2017
Staff Lead: N/A
Department: Planning Division
Prepared By: Diane Cunningham
Background/History
N/A
Staff Recommendation
Review and approve draft minutes.
Narrative
Draft minutes are attached.
Attachments:
PB171011d
Packet Pg. 2
2.A.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
PLANNING BOARD MINUTES
October 11, 2017
Chair Rubenkonig called the meeting of the Edmonds Planning Board to order at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, Public
Safety Complex, 250 — 5`' Avenue North.
BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT
Carreen Rubenkonig, Chair
Nathan Monroe, Vice Chair
Matthew Cheung
Todd Cloutier
Alicia Crank
Phil Lovell
Daniel Robles
Mike Rosen
READING/APPROVAL OF MINUTES
STAFF PRESENT
Rob Chave, Planning Division Manager
Rob English, City Engineer
Jeanie McConnell, Engineering Project Manager
Carrie Hite, Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services Director
Jerrie Bevington, Video Recorder
Karin Noyes, Recorder
BOARD MEMBER CRANK MOVED THAT THE MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 27, 2017 BE APPROVED AS
CORRECTED. BOARD MEMBER CLOUTIER SECONDED THE MOTION, WHICH CARRIED
UNANIMOUSLY.
ANNOUNCEMENT OF AGENDA
The agenda was accepted as presented.
AUDIENCE COMMENTS
Nancy Sewell, Edmonds, submitted a petition from residents who would like a sidewalk on Maplewood Street. She said she
has been trying to get the City to construct a sidewalk in this location for 24 years. It is even more important now that traffic
is diverted from 196th Street and Main Street whenever there is an accident or snow situation. The sidewalk is blocked in two
different places so people have to walkout into the street. She noted that the petition is signed by 165 people, and about 100
live in in Edmonds. Quite a few are from the neighboring communities of Lynnwood and Mountlake Terrace, as well.
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR REPORT TO PLANNING BOARD
There was no Director's Report.
PUBLIC HEARING ON LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT CODE UPDATE
Ms. McConnell advised that the City of Edmonds is one of 94 cities that has been issued a Western Washington Phase II
Municipal Stormwater Permit by the Department of Ecology (DOE). In order to comply with the Permit, the City is required
to review and revise codes, policies and standard details to eliminate barriers that would prevent the incorporation of Low
Impact Development principles and Best Management Practices (BMPs). She explained that LID is a stormwater
Packet Pg. 3
management and land development strategy that emphasizes conservation and the use of on -site natural features. It is
commonly thought of as a way to manage stormwater, but also has a broader definition when looking at overall site design to
include preserving natural resources and arranging development in a way that minimizes grading and impervious surfaces
and opens up solar opportunities.
Ms. McConnell reviewed that in an effort to comply with the Department of Ecology's Permit Requirements, the City's
stormwater code went through a major overhaul starting in 2015. The updated code was approved by City Council in
October 2016, and became effective January 1, 2017. The new code requires stormwater runoff to be managed on site where
feasible. In addition, staff has been working with a consultant to identify potential amendments to the Edmonds Community
Development Code (ECDC) to encourage LID and eliminate any potential barriers. Although the City's code is not seen to
present any barriers to the inclusion of LID in a site design, the language needs to be tweaked to update terminology, better
present opportunities for LID and get applicants thinking about LID on the front end of their project design. She highlighted
the proposed changes as follows:
• ECDC 9.20.010(A) — Definitions. The definition for "concrete curbs and gutters" was updated to read, "that portion of
the roadway edge constructed to city standards. " The City has a separate manual that deals with specific design
standards, which includes a variety of curb types. Therefore, referencing a specific standard is not appropriate. Staff is
proposing that the reference be removed to eliminate a potential barrier when considering LID options.
• ECDC 18.00.010(B)(4) — Application. A site plan is required as part of a development permit application, and the
language in this section was changed to include vegetation and LID elements as part of the site plan requirement. This
amendment is intended to bring to light there are other features that need to be considered with development. If possible,
it is desirable for development to work around these features in order to protect and preserve them.
• ECDC 20.11.030(B)(1) — Criteria. This section deals specifically with site treatment and takes into consideration the
character of the site and the nearby area. The current language is vague, and staff is proposing it be amended to read,
"Grading, vegetation removal and other changes to the site shall be minimized to protect natural resources, limit
disturbance of native soils, and encourage low impact development. " The proposed language is more specific and
encourages the use of LID to protect natural resources and limit the disturbance of soils.
• ECDC 20.13.020(P) — General Design Standards. This is a new section that recognizes LID is something that should
be considered throughout the entire design process where feasible. As proposed, the section would read, "Stormwater
LID Best Management Practice integration into overall landscape design is strongly encouraged, where feasible. "
• ECDC 20.75.020(B), (C), and (F) — Purposes. These are new sections that provide additional language in the
subdivision code to promote the preservation of critical areas and encourage LID, encourage site design that can make
the best use of renewable energy resources, and encourage LID practices when providing for streets and sidewalks.
• ECDC 20.55(L) — Terms. This amendment would add a definition for Low Impact Development. As proposed, the
definition would read, `A stormwater management and land development strategy applied at the parcel and subdivision
scale that emphasizes conservation and the use of on -site natural features. " The language also provides a reference to
Title 18.30 (Stormwater Management) for more information about LID -related terms.
Board Member Lovell asked if the proposed amendments include technology to utilize solar energy as one LID option. Ms.
McConnell said the proposed amendments are intended to encourage developers to situate houses in areas on the site than can
allow for solar capabilities. Board Member Lovell pointed out that solar energy is specifically referenced in the proposed
amendment to ECDC 20.75.020. He suggested it should also be referenced in the proposed definition for "Low Impact
Development" (ECDC 21.55). Ms. McConnell responded that the intent was that the term "land development strategy"
would capture a variety of options, including solar energy. She explained that LID is not just specific to solar energy, but
includes minimizing grading, working with the topography of the site, and situating homes in areas that open them to solar
possibilities. These land use strategies are intended to get developers thinking about LID opportunities during the site design
stage.
Planning Board Minutes
October 11, 2017 Page 2
Packet Pg. 4
2.A.a
Board Member Lovell referred to the proposed amendments to ECDC 9.20.060 and suggested that a picture would be helpful
to illustrate what a planting strip is. Ms. McConnell noted that this term is defined elsewhere in the code. Next, Board
Member Lovell referred to ECDC 20.13.020(P) and recalled that Chair Rubenkonig had requested that the acronym "BMP"
should be spelled out as "Best Management Practices." Ms. McConnell advised that this change has already been made.
Lastly, Board Member Lovell reminded the Board that the Firdale Village Master Plan was adopted into the City's
Comprehensive Plan. He asked how the proposed amendment to ECDC 22.100, which requires that trees to be planted in
parking areas, would apply to the structured parking that is identified as part of that plan. Mr. Chave clarified that the
requirement would apply to open parking areas and not structured parking.
Vice Chair Monroe pointed out that the language in ECDC 9.20.070 is prescriptive rather than performance based. He
suggested that it could be altered to simply state that "Vegetation placed in the transition strip shall be maintained." Ms.
McConnell agreed that there are a few places in the cod that give examples of how maintenance could be performed. She
agreed to review the language and consider opportunities to condense it.
Vice Chair Monroe referred to ECDC 18.80.020(B)(8), which requires existing and proposed drainage structures to provide
rim and invert elevations. He asked if this requires developers to have a survey done. Ms. McConnell said it would depend
on the size of the development. It is important for the City to know that the stormwater system will be designed to flow right,
but a full survey may not be necessary to provide that information. The information could be collected from measurements
and/or data that already exists. For large projects, a survey would be required anyway.
Vice Chair Monroe asked what is meant by the term "feasible" and who would be responsible for determining whether or not
LID is feasible for a given project. Ms. McConnell explained that the DOE has been getting stricter in its requirements as
time moves along. For example, the last stormwater code iteration used the term "feasible." While it encouraged developers
to implement LID on the site where possible, it was not mandatory. The new stormwater code requires developers to go
through a process to determine if LID is possible. They are required to consider LID techniques on the site. The term
"feasible" is used to address situations where LID may not be possible because of soil conditions, etc. When considering
opportunities to address LID in the rest of the development code, they are still in the phase of encouraging and trying to
educate people to get them to rethink how they design a project. The term "feasible" is from an encouragement standpoint
and there will be times when it is not possible based on site conditions.
Vice Chair Monroe asked if cost would be one factor in the decision as to whether LID is feasible. Ms. McConnell said cost
is not part of the equation when it comes to stormwater and other DOE permit requirements. While a developer could
consider cost when looking at the overall site design, it is not specifically stated that cost is a consideration. Vice Chair
Monroe referred to ECDC 20.13.020(P), which strongly encourages stormwater LID BMP integration into the overall
landscape design where feasible. Ms. McConnell said this is a general statement that was added to encourage LID. At this
time, staff is not proposing to put anything in the code that mandates that LID be applied in landscaping requirements.
Vice Chair Monroe referred to ECDC 9.20.070 and asked if the word "living" needs to be included. Ms. McConnell said this
is pre-existing code language. When the staff and consultant reviewed the code, they were looking for barriers that prevent
LID techniques from being applied. She agreed there are areas where the code language could be cleaned up, and this might
be one. However, it was not something that the consultant and staff looked at as part of the review.
Board Member Crank referred to ECDC 9.20.070 and asked why staff is proposing to eliminate the word "spraying." Is the
intent to encourage more natural types of maintenance that do not include spraying chemicals. Ms. McConnell said that, as
proposed, the provision would not prohibit spraying, but it was taken out to avoid encouraging people to choose that option.
Chair Rubenkonig opened the public hearing, but there was no one in the audience to participate.
BOARD MEMBER LOVELL MOVED THAT THE BOARD FORWARD THE PROPOSED LOW IMPACT
DEVELOPMENT (LID) CODE AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY COUNCIL WITH A RECOMMENDATION OF
APPROVAL AS PRESENTED IN THE STAFF REPORT. BOARD MEMBER CRANK SECONDED THE
MOTION, WHICH CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Chair Rubenkonig closed the public hearing.
Planning Board Minutes
October 11, 2017 Page 3
Packet Pg. 5
2.A.a
PRESENTATION OF THE PROPOSED 2018-2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES/CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
(CIP/CFP) PLANS
Mr. English explained that the Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) is required by the Growth Management Act and covers a
planning horizon of 6 to 20 years. It is intended to identify longer term capital needs (not maintenance) and be tied to the
City's Level of Service (LOS) Standards. The Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) is a budgeting tool that includes capital and
maintenance projects, and it ties the projects to the various City funds and revenues. The CFP is required to be consistent
with the other elements of the Comprehensive Plan, and there are restrictions on how often it can be amended. There are no
restrictions tied to the CIP. The two plans intersect when identifying 6-year capital projects with funding sources. The CIP
is organized based on the City's financial funds and provides a description of each of the capital projects identified for the
six -year period.
Mr. English provided a handout for Fund 016 — Building Maintenance, noting that some changes were made to this fund after
the Staff Report was sent out. The intent was to provide more realistic information by identifying the projects that have
secured funding versus those that do not, thus showing a positive ending balance in the fund going forward. Staff felt it was
appropriate to list all projects, including those that do not have secured funding, to provide a clear understanding of the
projected needs over the next six years. He advised that the City's Finance Department has indicated that Fund 016 will be
rolled into the general fund next year, but all of the projects will still be accounted for in the Project Renewal Section of the
fund.
Mr. English referred to the 112 Fund and reviewed the projects that have taken place in 2017 as follows:
76`h Avenue and 2121h Street Intersection. This is a capacity enhancement project to improve LOS at the
intersection by adding dedicated left -turn lanes at the intersection to improve the through capacity. In addition, the
sidewalks are being widened and the utilities are being placed underground to provide safety and aesthetic
improvement. The project is anticipated for completion in November or December, but the final layer of pavement
might have to wait until spring, depending on the weather. A huge stormwater detention vault was installed to help
improve the discharge of stormwater that eventually ends up in Lake Ballinger.
Bike-2-Health Improvements. This project is being done in conjunction with the 76`h Avenue/212`h Street
Intersection Improvements. It is funded by the Verdant Health Commission and includes restriping several roads in
Edmonds, primarily 76`h Avenue and 212`h Street to add bike lanes. Some of the work has already been done, but
they are waiting to complete the intersection improvements before completing the project. In addition, a number of
signs have been added throughout the City to identify the designated bike routes, as well as the mileage associated
with getting to a certain point within the City.
• 236`h Street Walkway. This project provides a walkway to connect SR-104 to the Madrona Elementary School,
which is currently being constructed. Funding was provided via a Federal Safe Routes to School Grant.
• 2017 Overlay Program. In 2017 the City was able to do approximately $1.3 million worth of overlay
improvements, or about 3.9 lane miles of work. The program will continue in 2018. This is an important program
for maintaining the street infrastructure within the City.
Next, Mr. English reviewed the projects that are anticipated in 2018 as follows:
• 238`h Street Walkway (SR-104 to SR-99). The City has secured a State Transportation Grant to build a walkway
between the two state routes, and the project was bid earlier in 2017. However, due to the large amount of
construction taking place in the region, the bids came in very high. The City decided to withdraw the project and
rebid it in the winter hoping to receive a more competitive price.
• Highway 99 Gateway Revitalization Project. The City was able to secure $1 million of the $10 million needed
for the project from the State Legislature. The money will be combined with $300,000 in Real Estate Excise Tax
(REET) funding to move forward with design work in 2018. This will be a costly project to improve safety via
Planning Board Minutes
October 11, 2017 Page 4
Packet Pg. 6
2.A.a
access management improvements. They will also look at underground utilities and wider sidewalks. The project
will tie into the recently adopted Highway 99 Master Plan, and it is hoped the City can secure grant funding to make
the project move forward within a 10-year timeframe.
Edmonds Street Waterfront Connector. The City secured $700,000 from the State Legislature to move to the
next phase of the project. Following an alternative analysis, which was completed in 2016, the recommended
alternative is to build a waterfront connector off Edmonds Street down to Main Street. The additional funding from
the State will be combined with $140,000 from an outside agency, and $150,000 from the City and used for pre -
design and environmental documentation. It is anticipated the project will cost about $18 million to complete, and
the City intends to continue to apply for grant funding to keep the project moving forward.
• Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements. The City secured $1.4 million from the Federal Safe Routes to
School Program. The money will be used for design work in 2018, with the goal of starting construction in 2019.
The project will include a large number of safety improvements, including pedestrian curb ramps, flashing beacons,
and a hawk signal on SR-104 near 80'h Street.
• 84`h Avenue Overlay (220`h to 212`h). The City secured grant funding for the state to move this project forward, but
it was delayed as a result of an over -commitment of funds. The City is anticipating the funding will be available in
2018.
• 220`h Street/76`h Avenue Intersection. This project builds on the improvements that are currently taking place at
the 76`' Avenue/212th Street Intersection. A pre -design study will position the City for critical grant funding in the
spring. The initial study will be funded by traffic impact fees.
• Sunset Walkway. This project has been on the books for several years, and it has garnered significant public
interest. They are looking at pursuing the final design in 2018, but the construction schedule is still to be
determined. There are a lot of moving parts. For example, the waterfront connector and changes to the lift station
facility will have a significant impact on the project.
• Dayton Street Walkway. The City received a grant from the State to add a missing piece of sidewalk west of 80th
Avenue. The project will be designed in 2018, but construction is not anticipated to start until 2019.
Mr. English reviewed the proposed 2018 projects that will be funded by Funds 125 and 126 as follows:
• Pavement Preservation Program. $1.2 million has been proposed for this program in 2018. This will allow the
City to continue to make key infrastructure improvements.
• Pedestrian Curb Ramp Program. This is an ongoing program, but the intent is to increase funding to $50,000 in
2018. The City is working to implement an Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Transition Plan, which is
required when the City receives federal funding. It is estimated that approximately $11 million will be needed to
bring all of the curb ramps into ADA compliance. Completing the needed ADA improvements on all infrastructure
in the public right-of-way will cost about $151 million. The City's intent is to continue to invest in this program.
• Minor Sidewalk Replacement. This program will include a variety of projects, including a section of sidewalk
west of 100th Street along the north side of the cemetery.
• Protective/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion. As currently proposed, three protective/permissive traffic
signals will be added at three intersections in 2018.
• Sunset Parking and Safety Improvements. This project will improve access to driveways along Sunset Avenue,
as well as some signage improvements. There is also some concern about drivers going opposite of the one-way
direction, and there will be efforts to correct this problem.
Planning Board Minutes
October 11, 2017 Page 5
Packet Pg. 7
2.A.a
• 89th Place Retaining Wall. This project will replace the existing wall that is failing.
• Traffic Calming Program. This program has been funded for several years. The City does an annual outreach to
the community, asking for streets that people feel would benefit from some traffic calming improvements. The
Traffic Engineer evaluates the requests based on certain criteria and priorities, and improvements are made based on
available funding.
Mr. English reviewed the proposed 2018 utility projects (Funds 421, 422 and 423) as follows:
• 4,000 square feet of watermain replacement, as well as 1.1 lane miles of overlay on streets affected by waterline
replacement.
• Five Corners reservoir recoating and tank improvements to help with operation, safety and venting.
• Seaview infiltration project to allow water to go back into the ground to reduce the peak flows onto Dayton Street.
• New Dayton Street Pump Station to address flooding that occurs during heavy rain. This project is for a grant to
complete the funding package.
• Willow Creek/Edmonds Marsh pre -design work that will look at different options to improve the restoration
footprint after daylighting Willow Creek.
• 1,800 feet of sewer main replacement and pavement overlay on .7 lane miles affected by sewer main replacement.
• 3,400 feet of cured -in -place pipe (CIPP) sewer main rehabilitation.
Board Member Lovell highly recommended that the City work to incorporate art into the Edmonds Street Waterfront
Connector Project as soon as possible. He commented that there are methods to utilize design to make the crossing a piece of
art. Mr. English advised that the consultant is already preparing a scope of work that includes some consideration for art.
Board Member Lovell asked if the pavement and sidewalk and curb work that is anticipated on Railroad Avenue from
Dayton Street to SR-104 in 2021 and 2022 would require that the frontage improvements done as part of the Waterfront
Center be torn up. Mr. English said the two projects would be coordinated. The City is looking at applying for a grant to
improve the sidewalk, which has been impacted by trees.
Board Member Lovell noted that the traffic area along Railroad Avenue was recently paved. He heard that Burlington
Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) has indicated they will not need to impinge on Railroad Avenue to accommodate the second track.
Mr. English said that is not his understanding of the situation. Preliminary design indicates that the station will be located
west of the existing track, which means it will impact Railroad Avenue. All plans for Railroad Avenue will have to be
coordinated, included BNSF's proposal for a second track and station. Board Member Lovell noted that the right-of-way
phase will be funded by the City. Perhaps the City should look at these improvements in conjunction with the EAC
negotiations that are currently underway.
Vice Chair Monroe requested additional information about the estimated $151 million needed to complete ADA
improvements. Mr. English clarified that this amount would only fund improvements within the rights -of -way and does not
include City facilities and parks. Vice Chair Monroe asked if the improvements would require full replacement or can repairs
be done in some locations to meet ADA requirements. Mr. English said that full replacement would be required in most
situations in order to meet ADA standards. Vice Chair Monroe asked how the City would be graded in terms of ADA
compliance. Mr. English said that funding has been available the past few years to do curb and ramp replacement. In
addition, curbs and ramps have been replaced as part of overlay projects. There is investment going into the program now,
which was not the case four years ago. Vice Chair Monroe asked if the City is required to do ramp and curb replacement as
part of all overlay projects, or if they can assess the situation and use the money elsewhere. Mr. English answered that ADA
improvements must be done with all overlay projects. Vice Chair Monroe asked if the City is also required to bring all of its
sidewalks up to ADA standards. Mr. English answered affirmatively and said the estimated $151 million would include
improvements to all rights -of -way, including sidewalks. He recognized that it will be a challenge to find the needed funding
for this work to go forward.
Board Member Robles asked how the projects in the CIP were prioritized. He recalled that there was recently a fairly severe
accident on Olympic View Drive, and some signage was put up to slow traffic down. He asked if these situations would be
Planning Board Minutes
October 11, 2017 Page 6
Packet Pg. 8
considered adequate to warrant guard rails or some other safety improvement. Mr. English said the Traffic Engineer
evaluated Olympic View Drive in 2017 from the standpoint of both speed and accidents based on requests from citizens to
reduce the speed. The study found that the roadway does not have a particularly high volume of accidents when compared to
other locations in the City, but they tried to address speed by adding signage, rumble strips, etc. The City will continue to
monitor the road and take speed surveys, and the Police Department has also done some additional enforcement to help
maintain speeds to the posted limits.
Board Member Robles agreed that accidents on Olympic View Drive are rare, but the consequences are high. People tend to
cross the line and evasive action is common given that there are bike lanes, cross walks, etc. He asked if the City is
comfortable with the current condition or if more citizen input would be required to advance a potential solution. Mr.
English said it is a matter of balancing priorities with available funding. The CIP takes guidance from the Transportation
Master Plan, which was developed through significant community outreach. The plan includes projects for safety
improvements, and the projects are prioritized based on public input. That is not to say that the priority list cannot be
adjusted and/or new projects included. He noted that improvements on Olympic View Drive would require a significant
investment given the topography and geography.
Board Member Robles pointed out that traffic in the area around Olympic View Drive is increasing and spilling into
neighborhood streets such as 1715t Avenue, and people are putting up signs on their own requesting drivers to slow down.
These are citizen reactions to inadequate support from the City. He asked if this is the type of activity that would push the
City to consider solutions or does the community need to take a more formal approach. Mr. English responded that the
Traffic Engineer has had public meetings with the residents in this area, and a number of smaller improvements have been
made. Again, he said the City would continue to monitor the situation, but at this point, there is no significant Capital
Improvement Project earmarked for Olympic View Drive.
Board Member Cheung asked about the anticipated completion date for the 76th Avenue/212th Street Intersection Project. Mr.
English answered that the project will be primarily completed by November or December. However, it may be necessary to
postpone the final overlay, depending on weather conditions.
Chair Rubenkonig said she appreciates that a description of each individual project was included in the CIP. However, some
of the diagrams do not provide specific information about exactly where the work will be done. For example, the map
provided with the description for the 220th Street/Highway 99 Intersection Improvement Project does not identify exactly
where the work will occur. She felt this specific information on the maps would help her understand exactly where each
project will be.
Board Member Crank said she loves the flashing yellow light that was recently installed at the intersection of SR-104 and
100`h Avenue. It makes the intersection much more bearable, given the amount of traffic.
Ms. Hite advised that the Parks CIP and CFP are funded by the Real Estate Excise Tax (REST), park impact fees and grants.
She briefly reviewed the projects that have been accomplished in 2017 as follows:
• Civic Park Master Plan. Following a robust public process, the City Council adopted the Civic Park Master plan
in 2017. The master plan will be formally adopted into the Comprehensive Plan later in 2017. To prepare the site
for design and development, geotech work has been done, and test pits were dug in mid to late August. The goal
was to get a sense of what is underground before starting the design work. A land survey was also completed to
identify utilities and grades. The City is in the process of putting together bid documents to demolish the stadium,
and tenants were given notice to vacate by December 1st. They are currently doing some preliminary rodent control
before taking the stadium down to mitigate future impacts to the neighborhoods. It is anticipated the stadium will be
demolished in late 2017 or early 2018.
• Frances Anderson Center Bandshell. This project was completed in 2017 and was dedicated in June. It fits well
artistically in the community.
• Meadowdale Playfields. This project is currently underway and is a joint effort with the City of Lynnwood and the
Edmonds School District. The City uses the playfield mainly for adult softball and contributed $500,000 to a $5
Planning Board Minutes
October 11, 2017 Page 7
Packet Pg. 9
2.A.a
million project budget to develop two multi -use soccer and lacrosse fields and do some turf on the infields of the
softball fields to create opportunities for year-round play. They are hoping to complete the project by the end of
2017.
• Fishing Pier Rehabilitation. This project is currently underway and will probably continue into 2018. There were
some issues with the center joint repair and the contractor is working to finish the work. The pier is structurally safe
and sound and opened to the public before the end of August for fishing and crabbing seasons. They anticipate
having 500 people on the dock at night in December for squid jugging.
Waterfront Development/Walkway Design and Permitting. This project is being done in coordination with the
Waterfront Center, which will replace the Edmonds Senior Center. Most of the environmental permitting has been
done, and applications for state permits were turned in last month. The design process has started, and the goal is to
construct the two projects at the same time, hopefully breaking ground in May of next year. Because the State
Legislature did not pass the Capital Budget in 2017, the grant funding earmarked for the project will not be available
until 2018 when the Legislature is back in session. The City will also prepare grant applications for park funding in
2018.
• Veteran's Plaza. The City worked with a strong community group to open the Veteran's Plaza. The project turned
out great and it is a busy site. Funding was put together by a community group.
Next, Ms. Hite reviewed the proposed projects for 2018 as follows:
Waterfront Development/Walkway Completion. The City is hoping to start construction of this project in 2018.
In addition to the walkway in front of the Waterfront Center, the project will extend in front of the Ebb Tide
Condominiums to complete the walkway connection. City staff is in conversations with the Ebb Tide and they are
not very happy with the City's intent to develop the easement in front of their building. To be proactive, the City
Council unanimously approved a lawsuit, asking the court to declare a ruling on the legal means for the City to build
the walkway within the easement it owns. The intent is to do due diligence prior to design to avoid having the
process stalled waiting for a court ruling.
• Civic Park Design Development. The design process for Civic Park is underway, and geotech work has been done.
The stadium will be demolished soon. The City will be entering into a contract with Walker Macy, the consultant
who did the Master Plan for the park, to start the design/development process. Mayor Earling has set $2 million
aside in his proposed 2018 budget to show the City making an investment towards development of the park. They
will also apply for various state grants to obtain the $10 to $12 million needed for the project.
• Edmonds Marsh/Daylighting Willow Creek. The Parks Department is working jointly with the Stormwater
Utility Division to daylight Willow Creek and improve stormwater runoff. The Parks Department's interest is to
rehabilitate and create more of a salmon habitat in the marsh, and the stormwater benefit is to remedy the flooding
issues. They will continue to work on the design of this project.
• Parklet Development. This project was moved from 2017 to 2018.
• Outdoor Fitness Zones. The City is looking to put in small outdoor fitness zones, and some money has been set
aside in the CIP. However, they are waiting to hear on a grant from the Verdant Health Commission.
• City Storage Building. This project is in the design phase and will likely be located within the same footprint.
They are hoping to complete the project in 2018.
• Community Garden. Funding has been set aside for this project, which is in the design phase. The City is working
to plot the garden out and come up with policies and procedures for a pea patch garden. They are currently in
discussions with Snohomish County to create an interlocal agreement that would allow the garden to be located in a
portion of Esperance Park.
Planning Board Minutes
October 11, 2017 Page 8
Packet Pg. 10
2.A.a
• Frances Anderson Center Playground. They will follow the same process that was used when other playgrounds
were placed, the City will open a public process for the selection of the equipment.
• Fishing Pier Restrooms.
• Matthay Ballinger Trail. This project will connect the play area to the Interurban Trail.
• Seaview Park Improvements.
• Yost Park Locker Room Updates
• Hickman Park Hill Erosion
Board Member Lovell asked if a new retaining wall is being added as part of the Meadowdale Playfield Project. Ms. Hite
clarified that the wall structure shown in the picture provided in her presentation is a backstop for the softball field. Board
Member Lovell noted that the fields are located in the City of Lynnwood, and they recently approved a crumb rubber surface
material. He asked for an update regarding crumb rubber fields in Edmonds. Ms. Hite reported that the City Council
appointed a committee to study the issue, and the committee has met twice over the past year. The City Council recently
extended the moratorium that was set to expire in July. It now expires in February of 2018. The intent is to wait for the
Federal Government study on crumb rubber before taking final action. These results are anticipated by the end of the year.
At that time, the City Council will make a decision about whether to lift the moratorium or make it permanent.
Chair Rubenkonig asked if the walking route around the Meadowdale Playfields would remain intact. Ms. Hite answered
that it would be changed slightly, but there will be a walking route.
Board Member Rubenkonig asked if any thought has been given to making the storage building at City Park taller and more
useful or perhaps moving its function to the Public Works site off of 212th Street. Ms. Hite answered that the building is
addressed in the Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan, as it is the oldest building in the City's infrastructure and
needs to be replaced. However, no money has been set aside for the project, and it will be difficult to obtain grant funding
for a storage building. The current location at City Park works well, and there is not sufficient space to relocate the function
to the Public Works site. Co -locating the equipment for both Parks and Public Works could also significantly impact the
residential neighborhoods nearby. When the structure is replaced, the anticipation is that it will be larger and the entrance
and exit points will be reconfigured. She noted that the park is busier during the summer months since the spray pad opened,
and having diesel trucks coming and going throughout the day can be dangerous.
Chair Rubenkonig asked if there is sufficient space at the Frances Anderson Center for the Parks Department to expand when
needed. Ms. Hite answered that if more office space is needed for the Parks Department, they could reprioritize the use of the
existing space that is currently being leased out for a variety of community uses. Just recently, two classrooms were taken off
line and converted to office space. The intent is to configure the area so there is sufficient space for staff, but also provide for
the needs of the community. Chair Rubenkonig pointed out that additional community space will come on line with the new
Waterfront Center.
Board Member Robles recalled that a year ago there was a heavy rain event that caused stormwater systems in the City to
overflow. He asked if mapping was done to identify where flooding occurred and is there a plan to fix the problems. Mr.
English responded that, with climate change, there have been several significant storms in the last three to four years that
have caused flooding problems. One area is in the downtown near 51h Avenue and Dayton Street. The City has done survey
and modeling work to identify improvements to solve the issues. They are currently working to design a project on Dayton
Street between 3rd and 9th Avenues that will include stormwater infrastructure to help solve some of the constrictions in the
existing system. There are many areas in the City that can use stormwater improvements, and the City has to balance funds
based on the severity of the problems. In addition to infrastructure improvements to address flooding problems, it is also
important to maintain the existing stormwater pipes, which is something that was recently folded into the capital program.
The rates were increased to bring in more capital to address maintenance of the existing pipes in conjunction with flood
improvements.
Planning Board Minutes
October 11, 2017 Page 9
Packet Pg. 11
2.A.a
Board Member Robles commented that most insurance will not cover situations where a house is flooded because a storm
drain overflows. A lot of citizens get stuck paying a fairly large cost to repair the damages. He asked if these situations add
priority to the work. Mr. English said there are a number of situations that can result in flooding, such as blocked catch
basins and properties that are lower in elevation. The problem may not be a capacity issue, but the fact that the catch basin
wasn't open at the time of the event. The City tries to prioritize based on structure flooding first. Board Member Robles
asked if citizens have the ability to request a claim if their property floods. Mr. English answered that citizens can make a
claim against the City, but a lot of factors go into whether or not the claim is valid, such as the City's maintenance program,
condition of the street, etc.
Board Member Robles noted that the Esperance area is on a different stormwater system, yet the City is responsible for
managing the stormwater that flows into Edmonds from properties in Esperance. He asked if there is coordination between
the two systems. Mr. English said he is not aware of any improvements being made within the Esperance boundary, but he
also is not aware of any situations where water coming into Edmonds from Esperance has caused a flooding problem. There
are connections between the two systems.
Board Member Robles asked what the City does to educate citizens and make them aware of the need for maintenance to
ensure that the catch basins remain open. Mr. English said the City has a staff person assigned to work on public outreach,
emphasizing the need to keep catch basins free of debris, especially in the fall when the leaves fall from the trees. There are
things that homeowners can do to keep the street front clear.
Mr. English concluded his presentation by reviewing the CFP/CIP schedule, noting that the Planning Board will hold a public
hearing on the draft CFP and CIP on October 251h, and then forward a recommendation to the City Council. The plans will
be presented to the City Council in November, with final adoption anticipated in November or December. He thanked the
Board for their questions and feedback.
REVIEW OF EXTENDED AGENDA
Chair Rubenkonig reviewed that the agenda for the October 25th meeting will include a public hearing on the 2018-2023
CIP/CFP, a status report on the Five Corners Development Feasibility Study, and an update on the Housing Strategy. The
November 8th agenda will include a presentation on the draft Urban Forest Management Plan. Mr. Chave noted that the City
has hired consultants to assist with the Five Corners Feasibility Study and the Urban Forest Management Plan.
PLANNING BOARD CHAIR COMMENTS
Chair Rubenkonig did not provide any additional comments.
PLANNING BOARD MEMBER COMMENTS
There were no Planning Board Member comments.
ADJOURNMENT
The Board meeting was adjourned at 8:51 p.m.
Planning Board Minutes
October 11, 2017 Page 10
Packet Pg. 12
5.A
Planning Board Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 10/25/2017
Development Services Director Report
Staff Lead: Shane Hope, Director
Department: Planning Division
Prepared By: Diane Cunningham
Background/History
N/A
Staff Recommendation
Review and discuss
Narrative
Report is attached
Attachments:
Director. Report.10.20.17
Packet Pg. 13
5.A.a
� � a
MEMORANDUM
Date: October 20, 2017
To: Planning Board
From: Shane Hope, Development Services Director
Subject: Director Report
"Only in winter can you tell which trees are truly green. Only when the winds of adversity blow
can you tell whether an individual or a country has courage and steadfastness."
(John Kennedy)
Next Planning Board Meeting
The next meeting will be held October 25 at 7:00 pm in the Council Chambers. It will feature a
public hearing on the proposed 2018-2023 CIP and CFP, as well as an update on a development
feasibility analysis for the Five Corners Area.
REGIONAL NEWS
Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC)
❑ The draft Centers Framework proposal has been released by PSRC's Growth
Management Board for public comment. (See: draft centers framework proposal.) The
public comment period will run from Tuesday, October 10, 2017 through Wednesday,
November 8, 2017, at 5 pm.
o Regional and local centers are the cornerstone of the region's long-term plan for
growth in VISION 2040. The draft proposal includes minimum criteria and
expectations for regional growth centers and manufacturing/industrial centers,
guidance for countywide centers, and recommendations related to military
installations.
o In addition to general comments on the draft proposal, the Growth Management
Policy Board is particularly interested in feedback on certain topics to inform
their recommendation.
o The Growth Management Policy Board will review comments on the draft
proposal prior to making a recommendation to PSRC's Executive Board. The draft
centers framework proposal is available for review on the project webpage,
along with other project resources.
1 1 P a g e
Packet Pg. 14
5.A.a
❑ The PSRC Regional Staff Committee met October 19, with an agenda that included:
o Transportation 2040 Update (T2040 Plan Elements and Safety Targets)
o Regional Centers Framework Update
o VISION 2050 (the successor to VISION 2040)
❑ PSRC's Transportation Policy Board got a first look last month at modeling results for the
Transportation 2040 plan update. One of the takeaways: By 2040, over 620,000 more
people and 690,000 more jobs will be within a short walk of frequent transit. That's
about a 50 percent increase from today.
Snohomish County Tomorrow (SCT)
❑ The SCT Steering Committee, which is mainly comprised of local elected officials —
including Kristiana Johnson for Edmonds, will meet on October 25 in Everett, with an
agenda featuring:
o Update from Economic Alliance Snohomish County
o Applications for Community Advisory Board
o Approval of proposed criteria and process for selecting representatives to the
PSRC Regional Project Evaluation Committee
o Approval of a letter to PSRC regarding the updated draft Regional Centers
Framework
❑ The SCT Planning Advisory Committee, which is mainly comprised of community
development and planning directors, met October 12 and discussed:
o Proposal from Shoreline to amend Snohomish County countywide planning
policies to allow Shoreline to annex the Point Wells area. This will come back for
further discussion at the group's next meeting.
o Proposal for amending the countywide planning policies to allow "land swaps"
between different urban growth areas.
o Update on PSRC's Regional Open Space Conservation Plan
o Potential approach to the next multi -county Vision 2040 Update (especially for
allocating growth)
o Updates from members on local plans and projects
Temporary Shelter Program Forum
A presentation about Snohomish County's Temporary Shelter Program will be featured at a
breakfast forum, starting at 7:30 a.m., on December 14 in Everett. The event is sponsored by
the Housing Consortium of Everett and Snohomish County. For more information or
registration, go to: http://housingsnohomish.org/.
Study on State's Life Science Industry —Critical Needs
High demand, stiff competition for information technology, and lack of skilled workers are
critical challenges for Washington state's life science industry, according to a 2017 study
commission by a Governor's advisory council. For more information, see:
https://content.govdel ivery.com/accounts/WADOC/bu I leti ns/lbeadcc.
2 1 P a g e
Packet Pg. 15
5.A.a
LOCAL NEWS
"Taming Bigfoot" Kick -Off
A friendly competition (called "Taming Bigfoot") to reduce our carbon footprint is getting ready
for launch at a community meeting October 24, 7 pm, in the Edmonds United Methodist Church
auditorium. Teams can start signing up now. For more information, see:
www.tamingbigfoot.edmondswa.gov. Below is a brief summary of this three-month initiative.
What is it?
Taming Bigfoot Edmonds is a team -based Carbon Footprint Reduction Competition
designed to engage Edmonds community members in supporting the City of Edmonds'
commitment to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. The goal of this fun, friendly
competition is to increase awareness of the impact that our lifestyles have upon carbon
emissions. The program is based on a similar competition held in Jefferson County in
2016. A local steering committee leads this community effort under the aegis of the City
of Edmonds Climate Protection Committee and the Interfaith Climate Action Group.
How does it work?
Members of the community form teams composed ideally from seven diversified
players. Team members are expected to: participate in meetings, sessions, and
ceremonies; record their carbon -related behaviors; and engage in the reduction of
greenhouse gas emissions. Organizers will make the final determination of participating
teams. There are no limits to the number of teams that may participate.
Over a three-month period, individual team members track five categories of personal
carbon -related behaviors, including: home energy use; home water use; transportation;
waste generation & landfill disposal; and shopping & food consumption. These items are
recorded using a monthly tally sheet by the individual. A team leader enters individual
scores (using tally sheets), calculating individual carbon footprints. The sum of the
individual carbon footprints make up the team's carbon footprint. In the first month, the
team establishes a baseline footprint. Information and calculations will be made
available to all participants.
The first month's activity will have team members establish their baseline of their
current footprint. From the baseline, teams will work to reduce their carbon footprint in
the second and third months. Progress will be reported in March before the push to the
finish line near Earth Day in April. Awards will recognize teams, individuals, and other
special winners.
Mud Slide in Edmonds
A mudslide of about 50 by 100 feet occurred at 73rd Place West and N. Meadowdale Beach
Road on October 19. No one was hurt but the slide damaged a portion of the house and
ruptured a natural gas line. After first responders had assessed the immediate health/safety
issues, the City engaged the geotechnical firm of Landau Associates to provide an initial on -site
assessment. Landau Associates has preliminarily concluded that while there is risk for
31Pane
Packet Pg. 16
5.A.a
additional landslide activity in the neighborhood (as there was prior to the new slide), the risk
does not warrant restricting occupancy of any of the surrounding homes. The City has allowed
occupancy to resume at the neighboring properties.
Housing Strategy
F1 Background work for developing elements of a housing strategy continues. Meanwhile,
a website is being prepared to display information about this ongoing effort. We will let
you know when the website is ready.
F1 On October 26th at 3:15 pm in the Fourtner Room, the Mayor's Housing Strategy Task
Force will have its second meeting. An agenda has not yet been finalized but will
include two presentations: (1) Strengthening Regional Partnerships by Verdant, the
Hazel Miller Foundation, and the Edmonds School District; (2) Information On Transit -
Oriented Development (TOD) and Affordable Housing by Sound Transit representatives.
o NOTE: The Housing Strategy Task Force's mission is to recommend priorities to be
included in the draft Strategy. The recommendations would focus on activities or
programs that the City can carry out —whether on its own or in partnership with
others —to increase the supply of affordable housing and meet diverse housing
needs.
F1 The draft Strategy will work its way through a larger public process too, including
Planning Board and City Council discussion.
Student Rep for Planning Board
Recruitment for a student representative to serve on the Planning Board is underway. Planning
Board Chair Careen Rubenkonig has been working with City staff on the process. A press
release went out recently and information is being distributed to Edmonds/Woodway High and
the Edmonds Community College. The selected student, who may be in either high school or
college, will serve as a non -voting Board member for the remainder of the school year and
possibility into the summer. Currently, we are waiting for applications to be submitted. All
applications will be forwarded to the Board for consideration. Then nominations will be voted
on by the Board at an open public meeting.
Marsh Study
Two consultant teams are being considered by the City Council as finalists to prepare a science -
based study of the Edmonds Marsh. The two finalist teams, Windward and Watershed
Company, will each make a presentation and respond to Council member questions at the
Council's 7:00 pm, November 14 meeting.
Architectural Design Board (ADB)
The ADB met on October 18 to:
1) Approve the design of the HomeStreet Bank project at 614 - 616 61h Ave. S. The new
development will replace two older commercial buildings with a new two-story building that
would have the bank on the ground floor and office space for a future tenant on the second.
An outdoor plaza adjacent to 51h Avenue is proposed while surface parking and a drive -through
will be located more toward the rear of the site.
4 1 P a g e
Packet Pg. 17
5.A.a
2) Review design for Westgate Woods Townhomes, which is a 10-unit townhouse development
that would be located on at 9511 and 9513 Edmonds Way. The proposal consists of two 5-unit
townhouse buildings with each unit containing a two -car garage and an additional two surface
parking spaces for visitor parking. The ADB has recommended approval of the project design.
The applicant is also requesting a height variance due to special circumstances at the site. The
Hearing Examiner will hold a public hearing on the proposed developed on October 26tn
3) Review the Port of Edmonds' application for a new 6,650 square foot marine retail building
intended for boat sales and maintenance. The proposed building will be located south of
Jacobsen's Marine with a boat yard between the two developments. The ADB recommended
approval of the project design. The new marine retail building is located within shoreline
jurisdiction so a shoreline substantial development permit is required. The Hearing Examiner
will hold a public hearing on the proposed development on October 26tn
Diversity Commission
The Diversity Commission's next meeting will be on November 1. An agenda will be posted
online.
Economic Development Commission (EDC)
The EDC's next meeting will be on November 15. An agenda will be posted online.
Edmonds Downtown Alliance
Edmonds Downtown Alliance reports that Community Transit will be featuring downtown
Edmonds businesses as places to eat, shop, and enjoy during the upcoming holidays. The
campaign will begin at Thanksgiving, with promotion of the tree lighting ceremony, and will
continue to highlight other events during the season.
Hearing Examiner
The Hearing Examiner's next public hearings are scheduled for October 26. Topics are:
1. Westgate Woods Town homes (please see ADB item # 2 above)
2. The Port of Edmonds (please see ADB item # 3 above)
Historic Preservation Commission (HPC)
The Historic Preservation Commission recently lost a member Eric Livingston, to cancer. He will
be honored in the 2018 historical calendar which is being prepared for printing. The HPC meets
next on November 9. An agenda will be posted when available.
Parks & Recreation
Looking for an opportunity which gives you a voice in the cultural arts community of Edmonds?
The City of Edmonds is seeking an Edmonds resident with a professional background in
performing arts to fill a vacant four year term on the Edmonds Arts Commission starting in
2018. The application deadline is November 27. 2017 at 5:00 Dm.
The Arts Commission is made up of seven members who serve staggered 4-year terms. By
ordinance, four of these positions must be filled by people professionally engaged in the arts.
5 1 P a g e
Packet Pg. 18
5.A.a
This opening is for a person with professional experience in performing arts, including dance,
music, film and theater.
The application and position description are available online at
www.edmondsartscommission.org. For more information please call 425-771-0228.
Tree Board
The Tree Board's next meeting will be on November 2 at 6:00 pm. An agenda will be posted
online.
City Council
The October 17 City Council meeting included:
❑ Presentations:
o Domestic Violence Awareness Month
o Introduction of New Franchise for Verizon
o Snohomish County PUD Renewable Energy Program
❑ Consent Agenda Approval, including:
o Permit Software System —Professional Services Agreement & Budget Approval
o Critical Area Ordinance Section (about Select Vegetation Removal) to go to
Planning Board
o Utility easements within the hospital campus area
o Authorization for public pedestrian easement along Edmonds Way (at 10032
Edmonds Way)
❑ Public Hearing on Historic Preservation Commission's recommendation of eligibility for
Gerdon House (209 Caspers St) to be on Edmonds Register of Historic Places: Ordinance
adopted
❑ Closed record review of the Planning Board's recommendation to rezone property at
9601 Edmonds Way from Westgate Mixed Use to Community Business- Edmonds Way:
Approved
❑ Changing the Comp Plan land use designation for 2 properties (9111 and 9102 — 236t" St.
SW) from Single Family Urban 1 to Edmonds Way Corridor: Approved
❑ Fishing Pier Rehabilitation: Budget approval for additional expense
❑ Introduction to LID Code Integration: Questions asked; this will come back for a public
hearing on Nov. 6 and potential adoption
COMMUNITY CALENDAR
61
• October 21: Somewhere Between, First free screening of Diversity Film Series, 12 pm at
Edmonds Theater, 415 Main St.
• October 31: Halloween, Downtown Edmonds, 5 — 7pm
• November 4: International Games Day, Edmonds Library, 10 am — 6pm
• November 5: Daylight Saving Time ends
• November 11: Veteran's Day
• November 16: Edmonds Art Walk, Downtown Edmonds, 5 — 8 pm.
• November 25: Edmonds Tree Lighting Ceremony, Centennial Plaza, 3 — 5:15 pm
Packet Pg. 19
5.B
Planning Board Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 10/25/2017
Five Corners Area - Development Feasibility Analysis
Staff Lead: Shane Hope
Department: Planning Division
Prepared By: Diane Cunningham
Background/History
Several years ago, the City undertook planning processes for the Westgate area and the Five Corners
area, with assistance from the UW Green Futures Lab. Westgate planning moved forward to completion
first. Planning for the Five Corners area was put on temporary hold while other city projects, including a
new roundabout for the area, were being completed. Now the draft plan/code for Five Corners (six
years old) is being revisited. See the attached draft.
Staff Recommendation
Consider a presentation that will be provided at the October 25 meeting.
Narrative
A first step, before taking on a public process and potential adoption of the draft code, is an assessment
of whether development under the draft Five Corners code is feasible at key sites. (Attached is a brief
summary of draft code requirements.) If development seems feasible, it would be useful to move
forward as quickly as possible to any final clean-up and adoption of the draft code. If development
under the code and market conditions does not seem likely, the City may want to consider adjustments
to the draft code before proceeding.
The City Council provided direction to proceed with a feasibility study. Earlier this year, the Economic
Development Commission provided initial recommendations (attached) about a study. The firm
Heartland has been hired to conduct the feasibility study. Results should be ready by the end of the
year.
Attachments:
Attachment 1: UW Five Corners Plan (2)
Attachment 2: ReVisioning 5 Corners Fact Sheet
Attachment 3: ECDC Memo on Five Corners
Packet Pg. 20
5.B.a
Executive Summary
ReVisioning Five Corners: A Special District Form -Based Code
The University of Washington, Green Futures Lab (GFL) worked with the City of Edmonds to envision thefuture
of the neighborhood business center at Five Corners The project goal was.
• to partner with community members and leaders to assess wishes, needs and opportunities;
• to develop and evaluate alternatives related to both use and form; and
• to use the preferred alternative to inform new approaches to City code that will support economic
development and help to shape the desired future of this center.
The GFL team included graduate students in architecture, landscape architecture and urban planning led by
faculty from the Department of Urban Design and Planning and the Department of Landscape Architecture.
With direction from city staff, the team led an extensive public process, developed and presented distinct
alternatives for review and comment, and created illustrative site plans for the preferred development pattern.
The GFL team then produced this report, which documents that process and provides a draft form -based code
to be refined and adopted by the City.
The public involvement process included an on-line survey of Edmonds's residents, a listening session in January
2011 to assess local needs and issues, a half -day design workshop session with the public in March, and public
review of alternatives in May. Regu lar briefings were held for the Economic Development Commission (EDC)
throughout the process and more extensive work sessions were held for in-depth discussions of the alternatives
and preferred plans on April 2or May 20, and June 15, 2011.The preferred alternative was presented to the City
C o u ndI on June 21, which referred the project to the Planning Board for further review and refinement.
The following Re Visioning Five Corners. A Special District Farm -Based Code document is the culmination of
this year -long process of re5earchr analyr.is and pu b I i c input. For Five Corners, the plan envisions mixed use
developments of two stories in height including a variety of residential units attractive to young singles and
senior citizens alike_ Improvements in pedestrian and bicycling routes link various developments within the
neighborhood center to larger systems of pedlbike routes through the city. The neighborhood center provides
amenity spaces for outdoor gatherings and events and requires both landscaping and green development
features to filter storm ater and to protect natural resources. A unique bonus system allows for developers
to build 3-story projects fronting the proposed roundabout, provided that the development incorporates
community benefits such as additional open space, green features, affordable housing, workforce housing,
and alternative transportation incentives_
T he anticipated development will be regulated by the city, using the Form -Based Code designed specifically
for the Five Corners area. A form -based code is a method of regulating development to achieve a specific urban
form and to create a prod ic#able public reaIm. In general: form -based codes are focused less on permitted uses
L1r densities thiln a traditioriA zoning c ride_ Far the Fire Corners area, the form -based code will apply to the area
currently zoned Neighborhood Business (BN), using a process consistent with the city's adopted Development
Review FroCB55.
FpllOwing a process of review and re,risian by the PIAnning Advisory Board, the final document will be submitted
to the City C o u ndI for considera#ion_ If adopted, the Five Corners Special District Form -Based Code will be the
regulating dac+ament for new development in the Five Corners area, replacing existing zoning.
Additional information about the project and process can be found on the City of Edmonds'website.
http:/Iwww_cl_edmonds_wa_us/uwstud6es.strn, and
htt�� Jfedrru nds_F�atr:h_c:c�rnlar#icleslseccnd=Five Corner5five-corners-meeting-announced
Packet Pg. 21
5.B.a
Acknowledgements
ReVisioning Five Corners: A Special District Form -Based Code
Project Leaders:
Stephen Clifton, Director of Community Services and Economic Development
Rob Chave, Edmonds Planning Director
Jill Sterrett, FAICP, Sterrett Consulting, LLC; Lecturer, UW Department of Urban Design and Planning
Nancy Rottle, RLA, ASLA, Associate Professor, UW Department of Landscape Architecture,
Director UW Green Futures Lab
Core Student Team:
Julie Kriegh, AIA, LEE AP, Architect, PhD Candidate in the Built Environment
Betsy Jacobson, LEED AP, MLAIMUP Candidate in Landscape Architecture/Urban Design and Planning
Tom Jamieson, MLA, Landscape Architecture
Jeanine Matthews, MLA Candidate in Landscape Architecture
Eric Scharnhorst, MLA, Landscape Architecture
Brad Shipley, CEP, Urban Design and Planning
Cascade Land Conservancy
Jeff Aken, Planner and Project Manager
City Boards and Commissions
City of Edmonds, Economic Development Commission
City of Edmonds, Planning Board
ReVis ion ing Five Corners!A Special District Form -Based Code
Packet Pg. 22
5.B.a
Table of Contents
ReVisiolnIng Five Corners; A Special District Form -Based Code
1.0 i Introduction
1.1 i Irrtent and Coals
1.2 i Summary of Background Research
1.3 i Summary of Public Process
1.4 i Five Corners J I lustrative Site Plan
1.5 i Organization of the Plan
2.0 1The Regulating Framework
2.1 i Purpose. Principles a rrd Intent
7,2 I Core Concepts
2.3 j Amenity Spaces and Green FeatureTypes
2.4 Stmet Types and Regulating Building Lines
2,5 i 8uildingTypes
2.61 Frontage Types
3.0 i Building Types
3.I i Purpose, Principles and Intent
12 i 8uildingTypes
3.3 Frontage Types
3.4 Green RuiIding Construction and Nousiny Oiversity Requirements
4.0 I Civic Investment: Streetscape and Public Space Standards
4A I Purpose, Principles and Intent
4.2 Streels ape Des ign5tarTdard5
4.3 Public Space Standards
4.4 Sikeway Standards
4.5 Stormwater Standards
4.6 I Parking Standards
5.0 I Private Investment- Gathering Spaces and Green future Standards
5.1 j Purpose, Principles and Intent
5.2 j Green Factor Requirements and FuIlfiIIment
5.3 Open `pace Standards
5.4 Parking Standards
6.0 Administration and Implementation
6.1 Purpose, Principles and Intent
6.2 Administrative Review
6.3 Non -Conforming Uses and Structures
6.4 Departures
6.51 heeght Bonus
7.0 Recommendations
7.1 1 Purpose. Principles and latent
7.2 i Attracting Young Adults as Residents
7.a i Informal Uses for Vacant Buildings and Sites
7.4 i City investments to Foster Development
7.5 i Mowment and Opportunities
Appendix _
1 a Gehl Architects" 12=Quality Criteria Evaluation
1 bVisuaI Preference SuTVey
IC Design Workshop Conceptual Plans
I Public Preference CaTds
le Survey of Common Themes
1f Economic Overview
Sa Green Factor Components
5b Green Factor Plant list
Explanation ofTerms
Sources
Page
5
x
x
Packet Pg. 23
5.B.a
1.11 Intent and Goals for Five Corners
The ReVisioning Five Corners. A Special District Form -
Based Code (herein called "the plan") establishes
a vision for new types of development in the Five
Corners area, currently zoned Neighborhood Business.
The plan proposes mixed -use development, including
dwelling units, offices and retail spaces in a walkable
community center with many amenity spaces. The
intent of the plan is to establish a connection and
"gateway" to the Edmonds area; create a desirable
center for local residents, while being inviting to
visitors; and unify Five Corners district with a
distinctive character.
The goals for the Five Corners Special District
Form -Based Code include:
1. Creating mixed -use walkable, compact
development that is economically viable,
attractive and community -friendly,
2. Improving connectedness for pedestrian
and bicycle users,
3. Prioritizing amenity spaces for informal and
organizes! gatherings,
4_ Emphasizing green building construction,
stormwatpr infiltration, and a vanety of 9 rtterl
features,
5_ Establishing a flexible regulating system that
creates quality public spaces by regulating
building placement and form,
6_ FnsurinO [Ivir• And priVAW inVerllMen tS WnIribu to
to increased infrastructure capacity and benefit the
510rOunding neighborhoods and I he t 0HIM unity
at large, and
!. Encouraging the development of a variety of
housing choices available to residents of
all economic and age segments.
Recognizing the complexities associated with this
neighborhood business site, the plan seeks a balance
between open space, green featuresr commercial.
retail and residential needs. The planning process
addres5ed the Five Corners area in terms of Life, Space
and Buildings,a process pioneered by Gehl Architects
oft open hag en_ The Ge h I approa ch is 5urnmarized
below;
Life: a vision for public life begins with the people who
five in the neighborhood, Including everyone's input
helps paint a dear picture of neighborhood life, This
1.0 1 Introduction
undolSlanding is the key to im-
proving neighborhood vitality.
Space. -The next step is to envision
public spaces that can best Support
the life of the neighborhood. What
types of public spaces do people
need for the life that was dis-
cussed in the first step? A focus on
the fine-grained, human -scale of spaces is crucial.
Buildings: Hnally, planning should address the
quality, height, massing, scale and functions of the
buildings that will support neighborhood life Arid
fit the spaces that were defined in the second step.
For the Five Corners Special District, significan t
attributes of the Special District Form -Based Code
were made visible through applying the Gehl
approach. Specifically, the plan features:
Life; green, outdoor amenity spaces, pedestrian
access; good internal circulation, shopping destination
wl local attractions, especially bakeries, restaurants,
and a gym; protecting the character of low Seale
development; and retaining the sense of neighbor
hood. For Five Corners, the understanding of this
vision was derived from a series of public meetings,
described in Section 1.3 below;
- Space: safe crossings, green open space, defined
plaza space; buildings to street edges; circulation on
pedestrian corridors and internal streets, bike -friendly
routes and dedicated bike lanes, water quality features.
For Five Corners, our understanding of these public
spaces was derived from both research ( described
in Section 1.2) and the public process (described
in Section 1.3); and
• Buildings: buildings grouped and focused on the
roundabout, ample open space; activated facades,
green roofs and deck access; incentives and trade-offs
for additional building height; tuck -under parking,
parking structures, street parking and surface parking;
and a sense of enclosure for residential and open
areas. For Five Corners, the process of creating a
concept for development (shown in the illustrative
plan) began with a hands-on public workshop
(described in Section 1.3) and evolved through many
iterations of working with the initial products of the
workshop, the plans developed by the GFL team, and
the input of staff, the EEC and the Planning Board..
Section 1.4 further describes the plan concept and
attributes of the plan design.
Packet Pg. 24
5.B.a
1.2 1 Summary of Background Research
In Fall of 2010, an undergraduate student team from
the University of Washington initiated the background
research for the ReVisioning Five Corners project with
a preliminary site analyses of the Five Corners area.
The team mapped sidewalk conditions, measured the
distance travelled within 5 and 10-minute walks of
the main intersection, and Collected parking counts
to measure the current demand. The team used Gehl
Architects' 12-quality criteria methodology to evaluate
the project site on the basis of the site's current capac-
ity to provide protection, comfort, and enjoyment for
persons of all ages (fig. 1.2-1 ). See also Appendix 1 a.
fig. 1.2-1
12 Quality Criteria for Good Public Space
Key
0
1•Pa.cem.p.lict
�.r nme.�.q.ma
aara.rn�agama
rt
irtla.aa<aa�.ns
.. anaxx.
u.q..r.n<sm..
D
(f.tlingds.Myj
Exvxlmwa
r
•nrne kaenn
C
-fNrYtri�lr
•Iw.d inl Uwd
r
emvmiacrn
sn..ee:
•itrwP..kne�t
I
N-
yiiypv9 ryn<mnr
� �. Por>barcip fer SPoW nip' aiblrcin
D 1mIRNG STaNOMG/STAnNG S�rTMG
M
F ow. hrvar�rg �d;
"57NgXeaee-fdnfd sdrxN pxvdNeb
• efvfa[e •Mdr.sf«rbn
T. ulWlkl.sm i. fdl—N A ulGl¢IH
XEANNG ITAWXG FL4YIIMEDIGXGI
•f..rry dnuxb L=P.
i
+'iRhA'M+ �r*war
w�el �nnMa�� aEwrar
Wei ate..
IrFM. rar..lr 'FrW rA�NM
wuG�ia ��
The results indicated that opportunities to safely
sit, stand, walk, and talk were found to be especially
deficient at Westgate, while the site did provide
interesting and unhindered views.
Phase Two of the Pfc�eet was initiated in January
2011 by a team of graduate students from the UW
Green Fulures Lab (GFL)-This phase OfWork focuser
on researching case studies of other municipalities
and their work with Form Based Codes. In particular,
the team examined recently adopted form -based
codes from Benecia, Ca., Farmers Branch, Tx., Ventura.
Ca., Miami, FI.. One of the GFL team mernWrs also met
with city officials and residents in Miami to discuss the
public process, challenges, and successes of develop-
ing the Miami2l form -based code -The luliami2I city-
wide plan was developed by Duany, Plater- yWrk &
Company and was awarders the American Planning
Association's (APA) 2011 Natlonai Planning Excellence
Award for Best Practice,
losing G I S (Geographic Informatlon Systean) data, the
team mapped property lineSr steep slopes. identified
the locations of mature trees, topography in a digital
terrain model, identified 5idewaik breaks, and recorded
other existing conditions. With input from the public
at public meetings, the GFL team identified existing
blking/pe&?strian connections{ green features, and
movement corridors for wildlife habitat_
The focus of Phase Three of the Revision ing Rve
Corners project inCiudad the public involvement
process that is further described In Section I -3-
12 Quality Criteria Applied to Fiwe Corners
tiFvaluated by UW DesignTe"
Phase Four brought together the results of al I
proviaus public vu*rkshops and the Pxt4n%ive research
work of the GFL team. In a public open house setting,
I he puhlit reviewed and re"r)dpd tc two draft
a lternatives,representing alternative approaches
to development at Westgate_ The public marked
preference cards to identify sate features they found
most desirable,
Thro4Igh the duration of the project, the team
worked with the Edmonds Economic Development
Commission (EDC) to offer local perTective, critique
the findings of the GFL teaWs work, and offer
guidance when rbeedecf_ Regular briefings were
held for the EDC throughout the project and more
extern ive work sessions were held for in-depth
discussions of the alternatives and preferred plans
on April 20, May 20, and June 15. 2011.
Packet Pg. 25
5.B.a
1.31 Surnmary of Public Process
The GFL team began the four -phase public process
in Fall 2010. During the First phase, the team
conducted an online survey to gain insight of how the
public uses the site and to learn what improvements
the public might dL%sire. The survey was marketed
by the City of Edmonds through a postcard mailer
sent to approximately 2,200 residences within a
7000-ft radius of each center. The survey was open
from November 9, 2010 through March 22, 2011 and
received 36! individual responses_ The online survey
fcund respondents, of all ages, considered'more
public spaces'as the best way to improve the sites
(fig. 1.3-1). Many respondents also stated they
des! red better restwrants and safer streets_
five {ornor%: Improvements by Aqe ciroup
Aga e A loges 25 - MI
{4n mp&rdk" MrP4)NVwM;
1.1;J re'�dPn�57
Ceti a�spor�cerrts�
� � a• � w I
—
I r. TM
-
fig.13-1
PhaseTwo included a public meeting. termed a
Listening Session, with abotit 25 people attending.
Led by The Cascade La nd Conservancy K LC} and t he
GFL team, attends nts of this session were presented
with data from the Phase One online survey, shown
examples of local built projects that reflected best
practices for creating high quality public spaces, and
given a brief tutorial on green infrastructure. The
informational presentation was followed by are instant
polling audience -response, visual preference survey.
Participants were issued digital "clickers"that allowed
for real-time tabulations of thL4r responses, which
allowed each respondent to seethe combined
responses of the whole group, They were asked to
respond to multiple-choice questions and select
visual preferences to vaflous building cOMgufatlans
and street treatments. Figure 1.3-2 provides are
example question and the audience response.
See Appendix 1 b for additional highlights from
the visual preference survey. The participants
overwhelmingly expressed the desire to bring
building fronts to the street and to allow activities,
such as outdoor cafe tables, on the sidewalks
where appropriate.
The city staff organized individual meetings with
some of the property owners in the Five Corners area.
From these meetings staff and the consultant team
gained an understanding of the constraints and
potentials for new development at Five Corners.
Guided by what the team heard in the first two
phases, the Phase Three public involvement effort
focused on a half -day Saturday Design Workshop.
At this workshop, residents and local business
owners engaged with design professionals in a
hands-on effort to create designs for Five Corners.
The workshop began with summary of what the
GFL team heard from the public during the Phase
One and Two processes and a brief overview of
green infrastructure. Approximately 40 citizens
and members of the city s boards and City Council
attended the workshop. The attendees were divided
into nine small groups, separately addressinci Five
Corners or Westgate. Led by a design professional,
each group designed a plan by first considering the
life (activities), they would like to be able to do on
site. The teams then located plazas and open spaces
needed to support these life activities on the site.
Building Placement
M toe Intl"" El7i" pKWpents wveisad le m"oe mumltts is i pmtFu4n
Mpnw h.IM cke*es aW m mm1idenccr;hpk'�o* ike m4 vrKt to 4* Wsinnw5'
ii N a
aik.p.nb,r►.u�krq
�Nu � lara
EJ4M4kMS hl lPH� Wiw�l.w6{h,Ytl
�r a
.µ
1 13-z
Packet Pg. 26
5.B.a
1.3 1 Summary of Public Process
Lastly, the teams used wooden blocks, scaled to
represent building sizes, to place buildings on their
plans to define the edges of the desired life -space,
enhance the overall character, and activate the site.
Figure 1. 3-3 shows an example conceptual plan repre-
senting the results of one of the Five Corners teams
at this workshop. The conceptual plans developed
by the other teams are provided in Appendix 1 c.
Phase Four brought together the results of all previous
workshops and the extensive work of the GFL team.
In a public open house setting, the public reviewed
and responded to two draft alternatives, representing
alternative approaches to development at Westgate.
The public marked preference cards to identify site
features they found most desirable (fig 1.3-4). See
also Appendix 1 d.
Through the duration of the project, the team worked
with the Edmonds Economic Development Commission
(EDC) to offer local perspective, critique the findings of
the GFL team's work, and offer guidance when needed.
Regular briefings were held for the EDC throughout the
project and more extensive work sessions were held for
in-depth discussions of the alternatives and preferred
playas on April 20, May 20. and June 15_
A Summary of Common Themes heard
at these public meetings is provided
in Appendix le.
Frg.1,34
��vrrMrtlrMira
--' '�1h7
�Fybn
a.ai�..��r.re.y+Myn
� 4errrna�
Fanwg4�'�gI IrMln•H
r�
Y
,fYRp�Ta�lJ dT
r o �
y C
r a
1
x Aekad f
Retail Nol s l��j
ca$v . -
ohm I ReTaii lr
1
r�41111fiC�
RrTail ! Farmers
Outdoor 1
rkct F.ia
ca�!
N
FC7:High Five Staying Alive
fig- 1-3-1
FIVE CORNERS ALTERNATIVES:''-�'
Fukathim mrily- #Ih6dOMIA autlliTat#Ouil10WUMM
GARKN GATEWAY
W er=.,narrax..
F]1dnN Vmdmiwmi
3,0 Mlatl"A tw��tl,iy hnyr#rIntrrx�rt
W W4`n' Sa I.nX
I Iih, Ir+M+��p.'liu4i�l.'Ir �k111n'it.w�J
IJ ceder w,MnSun Wyl*Rs4kk',�r�un+r,Me'.
hmyr�mriwunirm opl�ns 1� a mm'rrlry
LJvAr �n��ai^9a +,pr'WF�Ndnar�q lk+�
k-i1.,rai'tr.t�vsa �ww
wa+hi C'NI,l{x+n ayiaerhli►L7apr
rw wM..n. n��u� "'a bead inuar C.
ff" drwaiaps ArNdN
k.yeryq
El�hL&alrea reh as NL
ax Hof tilud�u�kn pr�rnl
IJ op"r fthq inm lraiwrl
I 1=a pA:r.4 p+lNFm wlrlla rtPlrrrrTm n.n.
L] n F k.tS dif M1YM
n4rk-k.n+w I�rarl rt�yn#a1r
bU*r'dl ,M r's,k'itllalwreetlrlalhri brFer
f]tr4R,Q Crmwws-
V1iti4{ C dlh
f bu Ww%Wrnu4I it rode wl imu*Wn
r] ianay hrt*r 1Mi■ drodhard mmiglhnrlar
re4► :'"NK " nproranon dnP '
r !»irinM'•Y+..w,nn
L�
Etl7YYl51YY ftl�Mlll� W I'i Mp�n�
prru i Wf['tMrmura9F waidrprattrriMn #IMrrG
r%A da„arsk<uwUan rredti ur
mew—ftyrrwWA +Kw
Elr"nampakWPW traAabm ffhb* r
11wr.ay yl.,F.,.ir r2%A'pWiJe+
&Curs r�ihwrlaratl apn
onl—r..ixgaa tCn Y++q
,,Franc MIMUumU.
I 1 Wntn%mMigsrgrtAirn
El�.,h iy �I".I llu'w�jrnr. •►". 4'nk'+w�q
&9nxn lr+lawirs•r lx�wldF Lutrn Wrrnrn
Packet Pg. 27
5.B.a
1.4 I Five Corners Illustrative Site Plan
The Five Corners Special District encompasses the area
surrounding the intersection of Main Street, 212th
Street, Bowdoin Street, and 84th Avenue in the north
east portion of Edmonds. Currently, these streets meet
in an awkward 5-way intersection that is controlled
by stop signs. The City is currently studying this
intersection and is looking to design and roundabout
to provide for safer traffic flow.
This area is designated as a Neighborhood Business
district in the city's Comprehensive Plan and carries
a "BN - Neighborhood Business"designation in
the city's zoning code (Chapter 16.45). The City's
comprehensive Plan currently allows for new develop-
ment of 2 stories, or 25 feet in height throughout the
area, although much of the existing development is
one story in height, with some taller buildings at the
Jeremiah Center and in adjacent residential uses.
Five Corners has served the needs of the surrounding
residential areas and the larger Edmonds community
for many years with a variety of uses. Local residents
participating in the public process for this study value
the existing coffee shops and the gym, as neighbor-
hood activity spaces. Current residents of the area
actively support these uses and other businesses
throughout the area. Current uses in the Five Corners
Specal District are summarizer[ in Table 1.4 1.
Table 1.4-1
Summary of Laird Use Characteristics
I"iVoCoroore
Amg
514.0. sr
Ralail
Y,Q7
13.25G
Scrsicc
1,67
17,"4
0fficC
2.37
19.010
Institutiosa Church
L, Q
12.172
4ingId: Family Rc%idenIi, I
Multilamily Rcsidcntial
U ndty eloprd
0.73 9.404
Toiai 7.14 71,42ti
Sourar, Ecommle Poundal for" Cwrwi and Hw Corms Comminrdal
Cerra by Pmperty Cou nselors. F&Fuary 2411.
The market/economic overview conducted in
conjunction with the Special District planning
process determined that the surrounding residential
area include 16,O04 residents within a one mile radius
and over 54POO residents within a three mile radius.
See Appendix 1 f for a surn mary of the market/
economic overview.
These residents provide the primary support for
current and future retail and commercial uses in the
Five Corners area; however, the retail uses are also
supported by a substantial amount of pass -through
traffic (over 9,000 vehicles per day) just along the busy
Main Street connection between downtown Edmonds
and SR 99. The economic study also notes that some
redevelopment of the Five Corners area is possible
within five to ten years, with further development
thereafter, given the current economic climate and
the nature of potential development for this area.
As discussed in Section 1.3, local residents
participating in the public process for this Special Dis-
trict plan were strongly in favor of retaining the gym
and coffee shop, while adding outdoor gathering
spaces and uses such as bakeries, and more public
uses. Many residents wanted to maintain the small
scale of buildings in general and were concerned
about potential height increases of 3 to 4-stories,
although they also desired additional amenities.
The additional features most desired were plazas and
courtyardsfor socializing, amenities such as fountains
and public art, and improved area walkability.
The core concept for the Five Corners Special District
is to focus new development around the round-
about and lining the streets while retaining the basic
character of the area. The intent is to protect the low
scale neighborhood feel, while increasing walkability,
activating the streets and sidewalks, and providing
gathering spaces, such as plazas and open spaces.
To support this concept, the Form -Based Code for
Five Corners establishes a Required Building Line
of 5 feet from the public right-of-way along major
streets as well as maximum and minimum Required
Building Lines for the roundabout, thus encouraging
new development to line the streets and activate
the sidewalks. The Concept Plan for Five Corners is
described in Section 3.1.3 (See also, the Illustrative
Site Plan in Section 3.1.3).
Packet Pg. 28
5.B.a
1.4 1 Five Corners Illustrative Site Plan
Figure 1.4-1 shows a 3-dimensional view of possible
development in the Five Corners area under the
form -based code. This view shows the building scale
and types of uses of potential future development for
the Five Corners area over the next 10 to 20 years. This
vew illustrates how the area could develop, but is not
intended to regulate the exact land use, size, location,
or amenities of future development.
In meetings to discuss alternative plans for the
Five Corners area, the Economic Development
Commission and the Planning Board recognized the
local resident's interests and also felt it is necessary
to provide incentives to property owners to create
amenity space and the desired small -unit housing.
Thus, the Concept Plan for Five Corners allows for
3 story development around the roundabout where
significant amenity space is required and 2-story
throughout the remainder of the area. All parcels are
also eligible for height bonuses that would allow one
additional story, subject to the Development Review
Process as defined in City Code and the bonus
requirements (see Section 5.5).
Fig- IA-1
Amenity Spate; The variety of outdoor sRaces
required of ali future development, which
Includes ;awns, plazas, squares, accessible
rooftops. and sidewalks.
Packet Pg. 29
5.B.a
1.S I Organization of the Plan
Re0sioning Five Corners -A Special VistrictForm -[lased Code establishes standards for new development
in the Five Corners area. The plan is organized sc that the parts interrelate and often must be reviewed
together. The sections in the'rable of Contents shown the main topics and the overall organization of
the plan. Each of the major sections is described below.
Section 1- Introduction;
This section lays out the goals and intent of
the code. It also describes how the code was
constructed relevant to background research
and the public process. This section also explains
how the code is 5tructrlre4.
Section 2 - The Regulating Frarnework:
This section provides the Ivey for the Form -Based
Code. It provides an overvL6 -w of the information
relevant to the permitted development standards
for each site and For the adjacent pubilc rights -
of,way,
5Action 3 - Building Standards:
Thls section provides detalled standards For
building types, inckuding placement, height,
and Frontage types, as well as greed bull ding
1:0na tru<l i o r i anti 110USing divl�r5ity reCluereMer,ts.
Section 4 - Civic Investment: Streetscape
and PUbIic Space Standards:
This section sets the standard for sidewalks, street
IreL-S, hike lades, larkdsc ping, and stroe Is with
the intent to build cahereNnt, safe transportation
corridOr5 for all modes of trawl_ This se(:tion is al,o
intended to assist developers in understanding
how a building site relates to the street.
Section 5 - Private Invostmont: Gatlhnring
Spaces and Green Feature Standards:
`his section provideS information on how to fulfill
Green Factor requirements. This section also sets
the StandRF& for PIaZaS, gathering spaces, and
parking cordigurations,
Section C- Aid ministration
and Implementation-.
This sect ion rlewibes how tl,e review of
development proposals In the Five Corners area
will be 4andled under the roan -Based Code,
consistent with City procedures for other
development_ This section aNn identifies the
bonus system which allows for added bulid Ing
height when various ronditiorn, are rnet.
Section 7 - Recommendations:
This section provides information for the City
Councli, Boards and Commissions that describe
actions the city can take to foster development
under the Five Corners plan and to meet the
goals of thfe plan,
Packet Pg. 30
5.B.a
2.1 1 Purpose, Principles and Intent
Purpose
This section identifies the locations and sizes of open
space, building form, and land use types allowed
within the Five Corners Special District specifically
in terms of Street Types, Required Building Lines,
Frontage Types, Building Types, and Public Space
and Green Feature Types.
Principles and Intent
A Core principle of the Five Corners Form Based
Code is to provide spaces for the use and enjoyment
of the public, green features which protect and
enhance the environment, and multi -modal access
to amenity spaces as well as to businesses. The
Regulating framework is the controlling document
and principal tool for implementing the Five Corners
special Dist r i ct f o r m- based cod es. The Regulating
Framework provides standards for the development
of each property or lot and illustrates how each relates
to the adjacent properties and public right of way.
The Regulatin} framework for the five Corners Special
District identifies the Core Concepts of the plan,
Amenity space and Green Feat ureTypes, street Types
and Required Building Lines, Su lid! ng Types,
and Frontage Types.
.0 1 The Regulating Framework
2.2 1 Core Concepts
I he core corticept for the Five Corners Special Distri ct
is to create a vibrant mixed -use activity center tixat
enhances the economic development of the city and
provides housing as well as retail and office uses to
meet the needs of all age groups_ 1 he plan seeks to
retain key features of the area, including protecting
the overall neighborhood character of the area, w+xhiie
increasing walkability and gathering spaces, such
as plazas and open spaces. 7o support this concept,
the form Based Code for Five Corners establishes
a Required 0uild!ng Line of 5 feet fforn the public
i ight -of -way along major streets as well as maximum
and minimum Required Building Lines for the round-
about, thus encouraging new development to line
the streets and activate the sidewalks. Other important
aspects of the Concept Plan for Five Corners include:
• An emphasis on creating a lively pedestrian
environment with wide sidewalks and requirements
for buildings to be placed close to the sidewalk.
• An emphasis on landscaping the plazas, open
spaces, and parking areas with a requirement
of 15% landscaped open space.
• An emphasis on sustainable low -impact develop-
ment with a requirement for bioswales, rain
gardens, green roofs and other features to retain
and infiltrate storm water on private property, in
addition to the bioswales along the roadways.
- An emphasis on providing for workforce housing
and increasing residential uses with a requirement
for 10%small-sized dwelling units and 10%
affordable housing, meeting Snohomish County
standards for affordability.
- An emphasis on providing options for non -
motorized transportation linking new bike lanes
into the city's larger system of bike lanes and
extending sidewalks and pedestrian paths into
the surrounding residential areas.
Packet Pg. 31
5.B.a
2.3 1 Amenity Space & Green Features Types
As noted irk the previous section, an important cornpon ent of the FlveCorners Special MUM Form -[used Code
Is the prcvision of arnpte amen ity space a nd encou raga rnent of green features throughaut the Special Distri ct
In addition to the requirernent,5 for individual properties: the Five Corners Special District plan includes some
corn mon areas that will pfovideamenity space and greei7 features. Specifically, theseInclude:
• Expanded setback areas surrounding the
proposed roundabout to pfovide amenity
spaces and landscaping to enhance the
usability of The area and to reinforce the
focus on the roundabout,
• Landscape enh a n cein ents at the proposed
roundabout to create a clear identity and
a dtstincc central point for the Fire Corners
Special District,
• A public space in the SE sector of the site,
providing shared anwnity space fcr residents
in the area for use as a farrr er � market,
activities, and special events,
• Linkages from the Five Corners Special
District to surrounding residential arras to
encourage walking and bilging to the District,
F Broswales along gowdoln Way and
Both Avenue
Figure 2.3-1 provldes a map of potential deve Ipmer t at Five corners and photos illustrating the character
of the development 'that c441Id Occur.
Fig. 2.3-1
Packet Pg. 32
5.B.a
.4 1 Street Types & Required Building Lines
This section establishes the regulations for three
Street Types and for the Required Building Lines which
all buIIdings shall be built -to associated with each
street (within the five Carners Special District.
The 51reetscape standards (such as street widths,
placement of street trees, parking options, bike lanes,
and other amenities) associated with different street
types are Shown in Sectlon 4.2.
The purpose of the streetscape standards is to ensure
coherent streets and to assist developers and owners
with understanding the relationship between the
public spaces and individual buildings. The purpose
of Required Building Lines is to establish a consistency
between the building frontages along the street
and a defined relationship of the buildings to the
street and public right-of-way.
84th Avenue West
(Streetscape Standards on p.
27 Zth Street Southwest & Main St.
(Streetscape Standards on p. _ )
Bowdoln Way
{Streetscape Standards on p.
Required Buildinq Lines
shall be 5' from Right of Way
See Section 2.6 for maximum
and minimum setbacks for
properties with frontage on
the Roundabout.
f}rawi ng for €odtng purposes ordy_
13
Packet Pg. 33
5.B.a
2.5 J Building Types
Properties its the Rve Corners Special INstrict are allowed buildings of 1 to 2 stories in height. Because of the
additional open space requirements for propertiesfronting on the roundabout, these properties are allowed
up to 3 stories in height. All properties %Mthin the Five Corners Special District are allowed an additional
1 story in height for development meeting the bonus criteria_
1. Rowhouse Two or more attached two or three
storyw nhomeapartmentsorcondominiums.
2.Cvurtyhrd - AclUrter ofapiYrtmenL or BandOrrliniU M
flats arranged to share one or more common
courtyards.
3. Stacked Dwelhng-The building massing is
predlcated on horizontal repetition and vertical
stacking of nGn-residential commercial uses on the
ground level with r"dentSal above.
4. Live -work- An 1neegrate-d housing apartment or
condominium and working space designed to
accommodate joint residential and work activity uses.
5_ Loft Mixe d-Use- Loft Mixed -Ilse buMings are
predicated on horizontal repetition and vertical
Stacking of units organized on lobby, corridor, and
elevator access. Loft buildings have greater height
per fl= to accommodate the second floor loft area
within a gjni1.
b. Side Court Mixed -Use- Retail mixed -Use with office
or residential above, or community service mixed -use
With Of ii UT resid"tial above.
T Commercial Black I Mixed -Ilse- Retail mixed -Ilse
or commu nity service rnlxed-t�se with residential
above. retail only, Off1Ce Oilly Or 4 q*MMUnity $QfViCe
mixed -use with office or retail above.
Each Building Typc is allowed only within specified locations wlthln the Five Corners Special Distr]ct
as shown in figures below.
1. RGYJhous*
Fig. 2.5-1
S. Loft MWWHJJt
Fig. 25-5
w. Courtyard
6. Sfdo Caere
. 1 ha
�S•z
AIq. 2.5-d
3. Stacked
7. CommMcld
ft LS-7
Z"
Packet Pg. 34
5.B.a
.6 1 Frontage Types
This section establishes the regulations for Frontage Types within the Five Corners Special District, The pu rpose
of the Fron tage Types fs to ensure coherent streets and to assist developers and owners with kinderstan ding
the relationship between building fronts and public space. Building Fron mqe Types are Carefully coordinated
with Building Types, see Section 3.3 for regulations on which frontage types are allowed for each Bu iIding type -
Key
Maximum Setback 4D'from roundabout
• • • Minimum Setback 20 from roundabout
Required Building Line
Primary frontage
Secondary Frontage
Standards
A minimLIM of 60%of the primary facade shall be built
to the Required Ovilding Line -
Any section along the Required Building Line that is not
defined by a building must be defined by amenity or
green space except to allow for th a mini mum necessary
openings for veh[cular traffic
Awnings, bay windows, or other building design
features can encroach over the Required Building line,
but not the Property Line.
Drawing for iOCbng PVFPW$e' only.
Examples Gf possible Building Configurations
oriented to the roundabout
Maxfmixedfrontage built
Builttothe MinImum5et-
wMinlmumSetbackand
backand corners built to
Required Building Lines.
the Required Building
Line.
. ; I f
Two bu i I di ngs can be Corners are built to Required
used tO improve internal Building Line. All Wmary
pedestrian circulation. Frontage is within the
Maximum Setback -
Pubiac Pedestrian Right of Way
_ Required Setback
OptionaI Setback (must be Amenity
Space or building space)
Loading docks or other service entries are prohibited on
street facing fa�ades,
Farades on retail frorruges shall be glazed with clear
gla ss n o less tha n 70% of the sfde al k-level story.
Any building facade facing a public street shall include
changes in building form, modulation, archways,
entrances, porches, OF stoops for every 12'of frontage.
Access through the building to rear parking or amenity
spaces is required at intervals no less than every 15W of
the facade facing a public street.
Packet Pg. 35
5.B.a
3.11 Purpose, Principles and Intent
Purpose
This Section identifies the building types allowed
within the Five Corners Special District, and provides
design standards for each type, to ensure that
proposed development is consistent with the City's
and community's goals for building form and quality.
Principles and Intent
The intent of the Five Corners Special District Plan is
to create a lively and pedestrian friendly environment
by providing for a variety of mixed use buildings and
spaces. Each proposed building shall be designed in
compliance with the standards of this Section for the
applicable building type and with the neighborhood
character identity identified in Section 1.4.
Allowable Building Types by Zone
A lot may be developed only with a building type
allowed by Section 3.2 in the zone applicable to the
lot. There may be more than type allowed on a lot.
Mixed Type Development
The development regulations are stfuctured by
the definition of distinct building types of the Form
Based Code that have been identified as specifically
suitable for Five Corners special districts in scale and
coniiquration. On deep lots and aggregated lots, there
is an opportu nity to mix these types within a single
development project. Mixing building types within
a project encou rages variety in the massing and
organization of the buildings, open spaces on the
lot, and on the frontages at a scale that is appropriate
for Five Corners.
Scale and Massing
The scale and massing of buildings is to be calibrated
to the existing urban context with the intent of
breaking down large scale building masses and
elements into"walkable neighborhood"elements and
smaller scale building clusters. The contiguous lengths
of building facades are regulated in the Frontage Types
Section 3.3_ T he heights of buildings will be designated
by area using stories as the measure rather than a
prescribed height in feet_ tipper floors are encouraged
to be stepped back from street to allow an accessible
roof deck or green roof area_
3.01 Bu11dingTypes
Five Corners may have 1 to 3 stories allowed on
pamek fronFing on the roundabout r'neeling the pla/a
requirements and 1 to 2 stories allowed on all other
parcels, with a bonus of T additional story on any
property meeting Lonus criteria, See Section 6.5
for bonus provisions.
Allowable Building Types
3.2, l Rowhouse -Two or rnore attached two or
three-story town hame apartments or condominiums.
.3.2.2 Courtyard- A cluster of apartment or
con dominiurn fiats arranged to share one or more
common courtyards_
3.2..3 StackedDwelling- Thebuilding massing is
predicated on horizontal repetition and vertical
stacking of non-residential commercial uses on
the ground level with residential above.
3.2.4 Live -work- An integrated housing apartment
or condominium and working space designed to
accommodate joint residential and work activity uses.
3.2.5 Loft Mixed --use- Loft Mixed -use buildings are
predicated on horizontal repetition and vertical
stacking of units organized on lobby, corridor, and
elevator access. Loft buildings have greater height
per floor to accommodate the second floor loft area
within a unit.
3.2.6 Side Court Mixed -use- Retail mixed -use with
office or residential above, or community service
mixed- use with office or residential above.
3.2.7 Commercial Block I Mixed -Use- Retail mixed -
use or community service mixed -use with residential
above. Retail only, office only or community service
mixed -use with office or retail above.
Life Space Buildings and Illustrative Plans
For reference, see Section 3.1.2 and 3.1.3 for examples
of plans for the Five Corners special district depicting
the design intent for the neighborhood center.
-16
Packet Pg. 36
5.B.a
3.1.2 1 Life Space Buildings Plan
i
REV ISIONING Fire Corners
LIFE 5 PRICE BUILDINGS PLAN
FAA. Ui. P62.
Gr*Gn $JMG
.. GfMRIGGO�
RAM GWd4n
' l#o}IFMiE t
N
ZJZ: 'lyre
a » en iaa
Packet Pg. 37
3.1.3 1Illustrative Site Plan
RMSIONING Five Corners
ILLUSTRATIVE SITE PLAN
n&V, , - - , , A ' r.f!,,; r.i! ri;-d Prm! ij -r -1 -.qr4e
titi
OuQd Irig Footprint
� Plus
�Xr3TjFkqj1LLijKtjO
panffl aowmda y
9 OPMn SP4KM
qm1m Gmrdr N
WfiLmr Fewtv m
9 w m 179
I Packet Pg. 38
5.B.a
3.2.1 1 Rowhouse
6ui Idi ng Type Diagram
Description
Two or more attached two or three-story dwellings
with zero side yard setbacks located on a qualifying
lot in the Five Corners Special District as shown in
the Allocated Locations diagram.
Access
The primary entrance to each dwelling shall be
accessed directly From and face the external street If
feasible. Where dwellings are accessed from internAf
streets, then the primary entrance to each dwelling
shaII Ew Accessed dire{ t I y fr€ FTI Arid fare t he iinterrlA
street.
Parking and services shall be accessed from an internal
Street Or alley Or tuck -under parking in a Mixed TyFre
Development. Parking entrances are allowed on an
internal street If the garage entrance does not o€:€ uF)y
more than one half the building frontage.
AII4wed L8Cb1dM
Parking and Services
Requifed parking shall be one spa cefor each
dw*,lliny That shall be in a garage or 1n a designated
surface parking zone.
Corner lots shall not have garages that face the side
street if it is feasib]e tQ pT*vide parking off an alley
or parking court at the rear of the building.
Services, above ground equipment, and trash
containers shall be located on the alley or screened
from the street view. Heat pumps and other noise
polluting equipment shall be located to the rear of
the building or on the alley.
Amenity Space
Front yards are defined by the street build -to line and
frontage type requirements of the zone.
One usable outdoor space shall be provided behind
the rowhouse at no less than 15% of the lot area and
of a regular geometry with a minimum dimension of
20 feet. Where buildings back up to steep topography,
the open space is not required to be usable. Alterna-
tively, 50% of the usable open space may be provided
at the front of the lot.
-19
Packet Pg. 39
5.B.a
3. .1 1 Rowhouse
Illussrative Photo; Wallingford
Landscape
Landscape may be used to separate a Front yard from
the front yards on adjacent parcels. Front yard trees
shall be of porch scale where adjacent to the porch
(at matrxroty, no more than 1.5 tunes the height of the
porch) except at the margins of the lot and as a part
OfthefrontageIand. apirtgatthestreetsidewa[k
interface, where they may be of house scale {no more
than 1.5 times the height of the house at the Matt] Fity
of the tree)
At least one large tree shall be provided or an existing
significant tree shall be maintained in each rear yard
for shade and privacy. Where appropriate, connected
tree canonry design is desirable to promote habitat
corridors and shading.
See also, standards and rules of the Edmonds
MunidpaI Code, Landscaping Requirements (Chapter
20.13). especially General Design Standards (Chapter
20.13.020), and Landscape Types {Chapter 20.13.030}.
Building Size and Nlasshig
Buildings shall be composed of � and 1 or 3 story
volumes in compliance with the applicable zone.
Buildings on lots fronting on the roundabout shall be
designed with a main facade far intJ 1 he roundabout
and may have a secondary facade to provide street
frontage on both side st reets.
Illmnz6* Photo; Tsoomi
In a 3 story builIding, a townhouse dwelling may be
stacked over a ground floor flat. In this rase, the flat
shall be accessed by its own from doors at the street
and the townhouse dwelling shall be accessed by a
separate front door and an Internal stair.
In a 2 story bulIding, the ro house consists of a
townhouse dwelling that is accessed frQrn the 5treiet
and faces the street.
Sustainable Site Design
Green Factor Score requirements shall be used in
the design of sustainable site features and low -impact
stormwater treatment systems.
Pervious surfaces shall be used where possible and
may include: pervious pavement, pervious pavers
and vegetated roofs. Capture and reuse strategies
including the use of rainwater harvesting cisterns
can be substituted for the effective area of pervious
surface required.
Runoff generated on —site shall be routed through
a treatment system such as a structured stormwater
planter, bioswale, rain garden, pervious pavement,
or cisterns. Runoff leaving the site shall conform to City
of Edmonds Stormwater Management Code
Chapter 18.30 of the City of Edmonds Municipal Code.
Related Sections
Frontage Types per Section 3.3
Street Required Building Lines per Section 2.1
Green Building and Workforce Housing per Section 3.4
Green Factor Requirements per Section 5.2
Bonus Provisions per Section 6.5
20
Packet Pg. 40
5.B.a
3.2.2 1 Courtyard
Building Type Diagram
Description
A cluster of dwelling units arranged to share one or
more common courtyards. The individual units are
rowhouses or flats or stacked flats. The courtyard is
private space that is adjacent to the public realm and
may provide access to tuck -under parking. Courtyard
building types may house ground floor commercial/
flex uses if commercial uses are ancillary to the
residenti81 U54p_ t OUFtyard buildings away be located
on a qualifying lot in the Fire Corners Special District,
as shown in the Allocated Locations Diagram.
Access
- The main entry to each iJF0uod Floor dwellirg Shall
be directly off a common courtyard or directly
fFOrn an 4 SXlPF[lall Street- Access to COM FniY rcinI
uses shall be directly from an external street.
• Access to second -story units shall be through Ari
open or open roofed stair.
• Parking shall be accessed through an alley or
interior street if present.
Parking shall be accessed from the exterior street
via a driveway if no alley is present.
Parking and Services
• Required parking shall be one space for each
dwelling, that shall be in a garage or in a
designated su rface parking zDne.
• Required parking for commercial or office spaces
is one stall per 500 5I•.
• Where an alley exists or is planned, then parking,
utilities and above ground equipment, and trash
containers shall be located on the alley.
Alkwad uAc&fiw&
• Where no alley exists or is planned, then above-
ground equipMent, and trash container, shalt be
located at least 10 feet behind the buildingg facade
and be f ul ly screened from the street view with
landscaping or fencing,
A m4oity Spice
Front Yards are defined by the street bulId-to Iine-
Sites shall be designed to provide usable open space
with a total area of 15% of the lot. A central courtyard
and / or multiple separated or interconnected court-
yards, roof decks, green roofs, plaza and courtyards
may be included in the cumulative total area.
In a project with multiple courtyards at least two
of the courtyards shall conform to the patterns below:
• Optimal court dimensions are 40 feet when the
long axis of the court is oriented East/West and
30 feet when the court is oriented North/South.
• In 40-foot wide courts, the frontages and archi-
tectural projections allowed within the applicable
zone are permitted on two sides of the court; they
are permitted on one side of a 30-foot wide court.
Private open space is allowed in side and rear yard,
courtyards, balconies and roof decks.
• Courtyards shall be connected to the public way
and/or to each other. Connecting spaces shall
be 10-15 feet wide.
Packet Pg. 41
5.B.a
3.2.2 1 Courtyard
Landscape
Landscape may not be used to separate a front yard
from the front yards on adjacent parcels. Front yard
trees shall be of porch scale where adjacent to the
porc#, (at treed MAIUrity, no more than 1.5 times the
height of the porch) except at the margins of the l of
and as a parI of the frontage landscaping at the street
sidewalk interface, where they may be of house scale
(no more than 1.5 t imes the height of the hou seat
the maturity of the tree).
At least one large tree shall be provided or an existing
significant tree shall be maintained in each rear yard
for shade and privacy_ See also, Standards and rules
of the Edmonds Municipal Coda, Landscaping
Requirements (Chapter 20.13)r especially General
Design Standards (Chapter 20.13.020), and Landscape
Types (Chapter 20.13,030)-
Frontage
Entrance doors and living spaces (great room,
dining, living, family) should be oriented toward
the co u rtyard and exterior street. Service rooms
may be oriented toward the Side -yard, rear yard
or alley.
No axterior arcade may encroach into the required
minimum width of the courtyard.
Stoops up to 3 feet in height may be plaoed a hove
below grade parking.
Building Size and Massing
Buildings shall be composed of flats and
rovyhou5es,�Ilone or in €arnhination.
Units may be repetitive or unique in design_
tNL9Ir&tiVC'cNM' AAinbMdge
Buildings shall be composed of one, two, and
three story MaSSe~S, each dim igrwil to house Scale.
The building Is not required to appear to be one
building.
Sustoinable Site Design
Green Factor Score requirements shall be used in
the design of sustainable site features and low -impact
stormwater treatment systems.
Pervious surfaces shall be used where possible
and may include: pervious pavement, pervious pavers
and vegetated roofs. Capture and reuse strategies
including the use of rainwater harvesting cisterns can
be substituted for the effective area of pervious
surface required.
Runoff generated on —site shall be routed through
a treatment system such as a structured stormwater
planter, bioswale, rain garden, pervious pavement,
or cisterns. Runoff leaving the site shall conform to
City of Edmonds stormwater Management Code
Chapter 18.30 of the City of Edmonds Municipal Code.
Related Sections
Frontage Types per Section 3.3
Street Required Building Lines per Section 2.1
Green Building and Workforce Housing per Section 3.4
Green Factor Requirements per Section 5.2
Bonus Provisions per Section 6.5
2?
Packet Pg. 42
5.B.a
3.2.3 1 Stacked Dwellings
Building Type Diagram
Description
Stacked Dwellings are predicated on horizontal
repetition and vertical stacking of units organized on
lobby, corridor, and elevator access. These buildings
may be used for ancillary non-residential commercial
uses on the ground level only. These buildings are
located on a qualifying lot in the Five Corners Special
District, as shown in the Allocated Locations diagram.
Access
• The primary entrance to each dwelling shall be
arces5ed kx� thial;gh a street level lobby pr
through a combination of streetlporchlpiatforrn
level ley accessible from the street.
The entry to each ground floor dwelling shall be
IIirectly from the street_ Secondary access may
be through an elevatoUstalr corridor.
Interior circulation, to each unit shall be thrcaugF,
a double or single loaded corridor.
Parllcing and Services
• Requ1ired parking shall be one space for each
dwelling that Shall be in a garage or in a
designated surface parking zone.
• Required parking for commerbal l offioe spaces
is one stall per SO4 SF.
Units may have direct or indirect access to parking
stalls.
Where an alley exists or is planned, then parkingr
utilities and above ground equipment, and trash
containers shall be located on the alley,
• Where no alley exists or is planned, then above
ground equipment, and trash containers shall be
located at least 10 feet behind the building facade
and be fully screened from the street view with
landscaping or fencing.
*ice Lrrom
Parking entrances to garages and/or driveways
shall be located as close as possible to the side
or rear of ea€ h lot_
Amenity Space
Front Yards are defined by the street build-ta line_
The primary shared open space is the rear yard. which
shall be designed as a courtyard. The rear yard may
be designed for ground installation or for the lid of
a below- grade parking garage or garage deck. Side
yards are allowed for common use gardens.
Sites shall be designed to provide usable open space
with a total are of 15% of the lot. Central courtyards,
roof decks, green roofs, plaza and courtyards may
be included in the cumulative total area.
In a project with multiple courts at least two of the
courts shall conform to the patterns below:
• Optimal court dimensions are 40 feet when the
long axis of the court is oriented East/West and
30 feet when the court is oriented North/South.
• In 40-foot wide courts, the frontages and archi-
tectural projections allowed within the applicable
zone are permitted on two sides of the court; they
are permitted on one side of a 30-foot wide court.
• Private open space is allowed in side and rear yard,
courts, balconies and roof decks.
• Courts shall not be less than 1:1 between width
and height.
• Private patios may be provided in side and rear
yards.
- 23
Packet Pg. 43
5.B.a
3.2.3 1 Stacked Dwellings
Landscape
Landscape may not be used to separate a front yard
from I he front yards on adjacent parcels. Trees may be
placed In front ya rds a nd i n side yards to create a se nse
of Place_
At IPast one lame tree !,hall be provided aT an existing
significant tree stall be maintained In each rear yard
for shade and privacy -
Courtyards located over below grade garages shall be
designed to avoid the sense of planters and hardscape
landscaping.
See also, standards and rules of the Edmonds
Mu n id Pa I Code, Landscaping Requirements (Chapter
20.13), es pecially Ge ne ra I Design Standards (Chapter
20_13.020), and landscape Types (Chapter 20.13.030)-
Frontage
No arcade may encroach into the required minimu m
width of the courtyard.
Building Size and Massing
Buildings shall be composed of flats, lofts, and
ro houses alone or in combination.
• Units may be repetitive or unique in design.
Buildings shall be composed of one, two, and
three story rnasses, each designed to house scale.
The building is not required to appear to be one
building_
Ilrultrativa Photo, Ga piwi HiH
Sustainable Site Desi90
Green Factor Score requirements shall be used in the
design of sustainable site Wtures and low -impact
stormwater treatment systems.
Pervious surfaces shall be used where possible and
rrtiay in€:iude' pervgQus PaVeTTMent, pervious pagers
and vegetated roofs. Capture and reuse strategies
including the use of rainwater harvesting cisterns
can be substituted for the effective area of pervious
surface required.
Runoff generated on —site shall be routed through
a treatment system such as a structured stormwater
planter, bioswale, rain garden, pervious pavement,
or cisterns. Runoff leaving the site shall conform
to City of Edmonds Stormwater Management Code
Chapter 18.30 of the City of Edmonds Municipal Code.
Related Sections
FrontageTypes per Section 3.3
Street Required Building Lines per Section 2.1
Green Building and Workforce Housing per Section 3.4
Green Factor Requirements per Section 5.2
Bonus Rrovisions per Section 6.5
- 24
Packet Pg. 44
5.B.a
3.2.41 Live -Work
1�
1�
1�
_a
r"
Bui Idi ng Type Diagram
Description
An integrated housing unit and working space,
occupied an utilized by a single household in a
structure, either a single family in clusters or a multi-
family, that has been designed to accommodate joint
residential and work activity uses. Work uses shall
be at the ground floor. A live -work structure may be
located on a qualifying lot in the Five Corners Special
Dist ri€ t. a% shown in the Allocated L"i*n &AgrArn-
Access
The primary entrance to each ground floor work/flex
space shall be accessed directly from Arid face the
external street If feasible. Where dwellings are
accessed from interrkal streets, then I itie prirrlarY
entrance to each dwelling shall be accessed directly
from and face the internal street
The u pstairs residential unit shall be accessed by a
separate entry and internal stair that is also accessed
from and faces the street. Access may also be provided
by a shared lobby that provides separate access to the
rnmrrrerciallflax and dwelling uses_
Parking and services shall be accessed from an alley or
tuck -under parking. Parking entrances are allowed on
an internal street or ailey if the garage entrance does
not occupy more than one half the building frontage.
Akwcd Locbrlons
Parking and Services
Required parking shall be one space for each
dwelling that shall be in a 9af a go or 1n a designated
surface parking zone.
Corner lots s hal I not have garages that face the side
street if it is feasible to pfiovide parking off an alley
or parking court at the rear of the building.
Services, above ground equipment and trash
containers shall be located on the alley or screened
from the street view. Heat pumps and other noise
polluting equipment shall be located to the rear of
the building or on the alley.
Amenity Space
Front Yards are defined by the street build -to line and
frontage type requirements of the zone.
One usable outdoor space shall be provided behind
the live -work at no less than 15% of the lot area and
of a regular geometry with a minimum dimension
of 20 feet.
- 2s
Packet Pg. 45
5.B.a
3.2.4 1 Live -Work
Illustrar We Photo: captioi Hid
Landscape
Landscape shall not obscure the storefront of the
gfnund #lour flexlwork space_
At least one large tree ShaII be prnvided oT an existing
significant tree shall be malntalned In each rear yard
fn1 Shade find priva C:Y, See a]so, standards and rules
of the Edmonds Municipal Code, Landscaping
Requirements (Chapter 20A 3), especial ly Gen era l
Design Standards (Chapter 20.13_020), and Landscape
Types (Chapter 20.13ffi%
Frontage
Commercial/ orklflexspaceonthe9r€undfEoors
and Iliving areas on upper floors should be oriented
toward the fronting street. SerViCerO*MS should
be oriented towards the side and rear yards.
Cornme-rrial/wtirklfl:ex spaces shaIC conform to
51oref ron t Type Standards_
• Buildings on comer lots may provide an appropri-
ate frontage type on both the front street and a
secondary frontage type on the side street facade.
Building Size and Massing
Buildings shall be composed of 2 and/or 3 -story
volumes in compliance with the applicable zone.
IlMsst"tly* P�triw; Ctpito3 HiH
Sustainable Site Desi90
Green Factor Score requirements shall be used in the
design of sustairiable site features and low -impact
stormwater treatment systems.
Pervious surfaces shall be used where possible and
rTtiay inLille' perviQU9 pavement, pervious pavers
and vegetated roofs. Capture and reuse strategies
including the use of rainwater harvesting cisterns
can be substituted for the effective area of pervious
surface required.
Runoff generated on —site shall be routed through
a treatment system such as a structured stormwater
planter, bioswale, rain garden, pervious pavement, or
cisterns. Runoff leaving the site shall conform to City
of Edmonds Stormwater Management Code Chapter
18.30 of the City of Edmonds Municipal Code.
Related Sections
FrontageTypes per Section 3.3
Street Required Building Lines per Section 2.1
Green Building and Workforce Housing per Section 3.4
Green Factor Requirements per Section 5.2
Bonus Rrovisions per Section 6.5
2s
Packet Pg. 46
5.B.a
3.2.5 1 Loft Mixed -Use
6ui Idi ng Type Di ag ram
Description
Loft Mixed -use buildings are predicated on
horizontal repetition and vertical stacking of units
organized on lobby, corridor, and elevator access. Loft
buildings have greater height per floor to accomodate
the second floor loft area within a unit. These build-
ings may be used for non-residential commercial uses.
These buildings are located on a qualifying lot in the
Five COFners SpgCiAI Di514i[t, a5 shown in the AIIo(med
Location diagram,.
Access
• The primary entrance to each unit shall be
accessed be through a street level lobby or
through a combination of street/porch/platform
Ievel lobby accessible from the street_
- The entry to each ground floor unit may be
thrinugh an elevatarlstak corridor_
- Interior circulation to each unit shalll be through
a doable or single loaded corridor.
• Access to u pper level loft areas via an internal stair
Parking and Services
- Required parking shall be one space for each
dwelling that shall be in a garage or in a
designated surface parking zone.
• Required parking for commercial I office spaces
is one stall per SOO5F.
- Where an alley is exis#ing, par€cing, utili#ies and
above ground equipment, and trash containers
shall be located on the alley.
- Where no alley exists, above ground equipment,
and trash containers shall be located at least
10 feet behind the building facade aril be fully
screened from the street view with landscaping
or fencing.
Alluwiik LocHiM
• Parking entrances to garages and/or driveways
shall be located as close as possible to the side
or rear of each lot.
Amenity Space
front Yards are defined by the street build -to line_
The primary shared open space is the rear yard. The
yard may be designed for ground installation or for
the lid of a below grade parking garage or garage
deck. Side yards are allowed for common use gardens.
In a project with multiple courtyards at least two of
the courtyards shall conform to the patterns below:
• Optimal court dimensions are 40 feet when the
long axis of the court is oriented East/West and
30 feet when the court is oriented North/South.
• In 40-foot wide courts, the frontages and
architectural projections allowed within the
applicable zone are permitted on two sides of the
court; they are permitted on one side of a 30-foot
wide court.
Private open space is allowed in side and rear
yard, courtyards, balconies and roof decks.
• Courtyards shall not be less than 1.1 between
width and height.
Private patios may be provided in side and rear
yards.
• The minimum courtyard shall be 15% of the lot
area. Central courtyards, roof decks, green roofs,
plaza and courtyards may be included in the
cumulative total area.
- Z7
Packet Pg. 47
5.B.a
3. .5 1 Laft Mixed -Use
11lustratirefhoto. Capitol Hill
Landscape
Landscape may not be used to separate a front yard
frOrri front yards or) adjacent parcels. Trees may be
placed In front yards and in side yards to create a sense
of P[Rce-
Courtyards located over b�-low grade garages shall be
designed to avoid the sense of planters and handscape
landscaping -
At least one tree shall be provided in the rear yard
directly in the ground or as a part of podium landscape
design. See also, standards and rules of the Edmonds
Municipal Code. Landscaping Requirements (Chapter
20L13), especially General Design Standards (Chapter
20-13.020), and Landscape Types (Chapter 20-13.030)-
Frontage
No arcade may encroach into the required minimu m
width of a CQUrtyarCIL
Building Size and Massing
Buildings shall lw r (imposed of IOft s A11)r10 OF AI)OVS
comrnercial space on the ground level. Units may be
repetitive or u nique in design.
F Buildings shall be composed of one. two, and three
story masses, each designed to loft scale. The
building is required to appear to be one building.
• The Main Vplurrie ably be flanked by A Set 0rld11ry
volume.
Ilruatrativt Phonic room ont
Sustainable Site Design
Green tractor Score requirements shall be used in the
design of Sustainable site features and low -impact
stormwater treatment systems.
Pervious surfaces shall be used where possible and
rttiay in€:iude' Pervigaf5 paVernent, pervious pagers
and vegetated roofs. Capture and reuse strategies
including the use of rainwater harvesting cisterns
can be substituted for the effective area of pervious
surface required.
Runoff generated on —site shall be routed through
a treatment system such as a structured stormwater
planter, bioswale, rain garden, pervious pavement, or
cisterns. Runoff leaving the site shall conform to City
of Edmonds Stormwater Management Code Chapter
18.30 of the City of Edmonds Municipal Code.
Related Sections
FrontageTypes per Section 3.3
Street Required Building Lines per Section 2.1
Green Building and Workforce Housing per Section 3.4
Green Factor Requirements per Section 5.2
Bonus Provisions per Section 6.5
23
Packet Pg. 48
5.B.a
3.2.6 1 Side Court Mixed -use
r�
Bui Idi ng Type Diagram
Description
A single or cluster of buildings containing dwelling
units or office suites arranged to share one or more
common courtyards. The individual units or suites are
rowhouses, flats or stacked flats. The side courtyard
is a semi-public space that is adjacent to the public
realm. Side courtyard types may house ground floor
commercial spaces with office or dwelling units above.
Side court buildings may be located on a qualifying lot
in the Five Corners Special pistrict,as shown in
the Allocated Location diagram.
Access
The main entry to each ground floor dwelling shall
be directly off the common courtyard or directly
from, an eater nal street. Access to cornrnercial i r d
office uses shall be directly from an external street
or side coUrtyard.
• Access to second -story units or suites shall be
through an open, open roofed, or internal stair.
• Parking shall be accessed through an alley if
present.
• Parking shall be accessed from the exterior street
via a driveway if no alley i5 present. The drive shall
be 7 to 10 feet wide and with 2 foot planters on
each side.
• Parking entrances to below grade garages and
driveways should be located as close as possible
to the side or rear of each lot.
Allowed Lw&fiom
Parking and Services
• Required parkingshall beonespace for each
dwelling that shall be in a garage or in a
designated surface parking zone.
• Required parking for commercial or ofFrce spaces
Is one stal I per 500 SF.
• Who re,3r%aHey 4 e;(PSting, parking, utilities and
above ground equipment, and trash containers
shall be located on the alley.
• Where no alley exists, above ground equipment,
and trash containers shall be located at least
10 feet behind the building facade and befully
screened from the street view with landscaping
or fencing.
Amenity Spate
Front Yards are defined by the street build -to line.
Courtyard buildings shall be designed to provide
a side courtyard and or multiple separated or
interconnected courtyards with a minimum dimension
of 20 feet and 15% of the lot area.
In a project with multiple courtyards at least two of
the courtyards shall conform to the patterns below:
• Dwellings shall face an active side yard.
• Major ground floor rooms shall be open to the
active side yard with large windows and doors.
• When located on an active side yard, a driveway
shall be integrated into the design of the yard
through the use of a reduced paved area,
permeable paving materials for a landscaped area
and usable outdoor space.
• Rear yards are not required.
- 29
Packet Pg. 49
5.B.a
3. .6 1 Side Court Mixed -use
Landscape
Landscape may not be used to separate a front yard
from the front yards on adjacent parcels. Front yard
trees shall be of porch scale where adjacent to the
porc#, (at treed rnAturity, no more than, 1.5 times the
hefght of the porch) except at the margins of the lot
and as a paTI of the frontage landscaping at the street
sidewalk interface, where they may be of house scale
(no more than t _5 ti"s the height of the house at the
maturity of the tree)_
At least one large tree shall be provided or an existing
significant tree shall be maintained in each rear yard
for shade and privacy. Trees may also be placed in side
yards for privacy.
See also, stan dardsand rules of the Edmonds
Municipal Code, Landscaping Requirements (Chapter
20.13), especially General Design Standards (Chapter
20.13.020), and Landscape Types (Chapter 20.13.030)_
Frontage
F Entrarice doors and IWin q spaces (great room,
dining. living, family) should he oriented toward
the co rtyard and/or exterior street. Service
rooms may be oriented toward the side -yardr rear
yard or alley.
• No exterior arcade may ericroach into the required
minimum width of the side courtyard
Building Size and l ssing
Bu iIdings shall be corn posed as large single
buildings of primarily two story volumes, and to
the side yards as two -and thee -story masses where
g rades al I ow.
a, — — �-
lll dmlive Phow; 811 inbridge
The building elevation abutting an Inactive slide
yard shall be designed to provide at least one
horizontal break of at least three feet and one
VerticaI break,
Buildings on corner lots shall be designed with
two facades of equal architectural expression.
Lf nits within the bull'dings may be flats and/or
townhouses.
Sustainable Site Design
Green Factor Score requirements shall be used in the
design of sustainable site features and low -impact
stormwater treatment systems.
Pervious surfaces shall be used where possible and
may include: pervious pavement, pervious pavers
and vegetated roofs. Capture and reuse strategies
including the use of rainwater harvesting cisterns
can be substituted for the effective area of pervious
surface required.
Runoff generated on —site shall be routed through
a treatment system such as a structured stormwater
planter, bioswale, rain garden, pervious pavement, or
cisterns. Runoff leaving the site shall conform to City
of Edmonds Stormwater Management Code Chapter
18.30 of the City of Edmonds Municipal Code.
Related Sections
Frontage Types per Section 3.3
Street Required Building Lines per Section 2.1
Green Building and Workforce Housing per Section 3.4
Green Factor Requirements per Section 5.2
Bonus Provisions per Section 6.5
30
Packet Pg. 50
5.B.a
3.2.7 Commercial Block- Mixed -use
- -
-
'��
6ui Idi ng Type Diagram
Description
Commercial block dwellings are designed for retail,
service, and for office uses on the ground floor street
frontage, with upper floors configured for dwelling
units or commercial uses. The buildings are predicated
on horizontal repetition and vertical stacking of units
organized on lobby, corridor, and elevator access.
These buildings shall be used for non-residential com-
mercial uses on the ground level_ These buildings are
located on a qualifying lot in the Five Corners Special
District, a5 shown in the Allocated Location diagram.
Access
• I he primary entrance to each building shall be
accessed be through a street Jevel lobby or
through a combination of streetfporchlplatform
level lobby accessible from the street.
• I nterior circulation to each unit shall be through
a double or single loaded corridor.
• I he entry to each ground floor corn mercial space
shall be directly from and face the street.
Parking and Services
Required Parking shall be cane space for each
dwelling that shall be in a qurage or in a
designated su rface parking zone.
Required parking for commercial or office spates
is one stall per 500 SF.
• Where an alley is exis#ing, parking, utilities and
above ground equipment, and trash containers
shall be located on the alley.
Where no alley exists, above ground equipment,
and trash containers shall toe located at least
10 feet behind the building facade and be fully
screened from the street view with landscaping
or fencing.
,Ulowred Lacali'ons
• Parking entrances to garages and/or driveways
shall be loratt cd as close as posSiblt% to the side
or rear of each lot.
Amen ity Space
Front Yards are defined by the street bulId-to line
:grid fronIAgs tyFre requirerTionts of the,,om-_
The primary shared open space is the rear yard. The
yard may be designed for ground installation or for the
lid of a below grade parking garage or garage deck.
Side yards are allowed for common use gardens.
In a project with multiple courtyards at least two of
the courts shall conform to the patterns below:.
• Optimal court dimensions are 40 feet when the
long axis of the court is oriented East/West and
30 feet when the court is oriented North/South.
• In 40-foot wide courts, the frontages and
architectural projections allowed within the
applicable zone are permitted on two sides of the
court; they are permitted on one side of a 30-foot
wide court.
• Private open space is allowed in side and rear yard,
courts, balconies and roof decks.
• Courts shall not be less than 1:1 between width
and height.
• Private patios may be provided in side and rear
yards.
• The minimum courtyard shall be 15% of the lot
area. Central courtyards, roof decks, green roofs,
plaza and courtyards may be included in the
cumulative total area.
-31
Packet Pg. 51
5.B.a
3.2.7 1 Commercial Black- Mixed -use
IJluslrhtiva• Ph. to' Ff4emonl
Landscape
Private landscape is not required. Trees may be placed
in front yards and in :We ya rds to curate a sense of
place.
Courtyards located over below -grade garages shall be
desiype.d to 43void IFS sense Of F)iartitOrs and haTdscap*
landscaping, At least one tree shall be provided In the
rear yard directly iri the ground or a a part of podi urn
landscape design.
See also, standards acid rules of the Edmonds
Municipal Code. Landscaping Requirements (Chapter
20.13). especially General Design Standards (Chapter
20.13.020), and Landscape Types (Chapter 20.13.030).
Frontage
No arcade may encroach into the required minimum
width of a courtyard.
Building Size and Massing
Buildings shall be composed of office, retail, flats,
row houses or Iotts alone or above commercial space
on the ground level. units may be repetitive or unique
in design.
Buildings shall be composed of one, two, and three
stoi y masses. The building is required to appear to
be one building -
The main volu me may be flanked by a secondary
volume -
Large floor plate retail such as grocery stores,
nurseryr and exercise gyms are allowed on the first
or second floors of a mixed -use building,
III u s1 ratio! Phow; Fremont
Sustainable Site Design
Green Factor Score requirements shall be used In the
design of stistainable site features and low —imp
stormwater treatment systems.
Pervious surfaces shall be used where possible and
may in€:iude: perViUM PaVernertitr PAMViou5 Pavers
and vegetated roofs, Capture and reuse strategies
including the use of rainwater harvesting cisterns
can be substituted for the effective area of pervious
surface required.
Runoff generated on —site shall be routed through a
treatment system such as a structured stormwater
planter, bioswale, rain garden, pervious pavement, or
cisterns. Runoff leaving the site shall conform to City
of Edmonds Stormwater Management Code Chapter
18.30 of the City of Edmonds Municipal Code.
Related Sections
Frontage Types per Section 3.3
Street Required Building Lines per Section 2.1
Green Building and Workforce Housing per Section 3.4
Green Factor Requirements per Section 5.2
Bonus Provisions per Section 6.5
3�
Packet Pg. 52
5.B.a
3.3 1 Frontage Types
Purpose
This Section defines how the buildings within Five
Corners relate to the public realm of the sidewalk
and other common use areas. The purpose of defin-
ing Frontage Types is to encourage the development
of a variety of frontage types and to encourage each
building to relate to the public realm in ways that are
attractive, inviting, and accessible to all.
Principles and Standards
The frontage types for each proposed development
shall be designed in compliance with the principles
of the City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan Housing
Element and in concert with the Building Types
and standards presented in Section 3.0, 3.1, 3.2, 3.3,
3.4, and Section 5.5, as well as the neighborhood
character identity identified for the Special District
of Five Corners.
This section identifies five Frontage Types, as shown
in Figure 3.3.1. Each of the five frontage types
are described and depicted in a section view. For
each Frontage Type, the description concludes by
identifying those Building Types for which that
Frontage Type is permitted.
Fri rnary Frontage: Frontage that faces the public
space or areas of higher pedestrian irnpottance.
Fntrances aW fRgU[rQd.
Secondary Frontage: Frontage that faces public
space or areas of lesser pedestrian importance.
Entrances to buildings are not required.
s3
Packet Pg. 53
5.B.a
3.3 1 Frontage Types
lick 3.3-1
Private Op 4 Public
Frontage Frontage
Required Building
Line V
i
s I
s
�
t
l
r
44 b?
I
p
ki
a
a.Torraeo or Elevated Entry: The main fa4ade is setback from the frontage line by
an elevated terrace or entry. This type buffers residential use from sidewaIks.The
elevated terrace 15 also suitable for outdoor cafes. Terrace or Elevated Entry frontage
may Fw used on Rawhouse, Courtyard, Live -Work, Stacked Dwellings, Loft Mixed -
Use bulldIng types, Side Court Office, or Commercial Black Mixed -Use building
types.
b.Forocoort:The main fa4ade is at the required building line with a portion setback
for a small court space. The court could be used to provide shopping or restaurant
seating In commercial zones, or as an entry court for residential zones. This type
shuul€f be used sparingly. Forecourt frontage may be used on Courtyard, Stacked
Dwellingsr and Lure -Work building types.
r. Stoop -The main fa de is near the frontage line with the first story elevated to
provide privacy.The stoop is appropriate for ground floor residential use (1). Stoop
frontage may be used on Rowhouse, Courtyard, Live -Work, and Stacked Dwellings
building types.
d. Shopfront: The main fa4ade is aligned close to the frontage line with the building
entrance at sidewalk 9rade. The covering shall extent far enough to provide
p@destr ans protections From the weather. This type is appropriate for retail or office
use only. 5hopfront frontage may be used on Stacked Dwellings, Live -Work, Loft
Nlixed-U5e, Side Court Office, or Commercial Block Mixed -Use building types where
the building provides ground floor retail or office uses.
a.Gallary:The main facade is set back from the frontage line with an attached
cantilevered colonnade overlapping the sidewalk.The entry should be at sidewalk
grade_ The gallery should be no less than 8'feet wide. This type is appropriate for
retail or office use only. Gallery frontage may be used on Stacked Dwellings, Live -
Work, Loft Mixed -Use, Side Court Office, or Commercial Block Mixed -Use building
types where the building provides ground floor retail or office uses.
(1) Stoop type frontage (type c) is not allowed on buildings oriented to the roundabout.
34
Packet Pg. 54
5.B.a
3.4 1 Green Building Construction and Housing Diversity Requirements
Purpose
The purpose of this Section is to encourage the
development of a variety of housing choices available
to residents of all economic segments and to encour-
age sustainable development through the use of
development standards, requirements and incentives.
Principles and Standards
Each proposed development shall be designed in
compliance with the principles of the City of Edmonds
Comprehensive Plan Housing Element. In addition,
the standards of Section 3.0, 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4, and
Section 5.5 and with the neighborhood character iden-
tity identified for the Special District of Five Corners.
Community Resource Preservation Goals
The City's Comprehensive Plan encourages the
availability of basic community resources such as:
open space, parks and other recreation facilities;
preservation of light, privacy, views, open spaces,
shorelines and other natural features; and freedom
from air, water, noise and visual pollution. Land Use
policies encourage strategic planning for development
and redevelopment that achieve a balanced and coor-
dinated approach to econoric development, housing
and cultural goals; and encourage a more active and
vital setting for new business supported by nearby
residents, downtown commercial activity and visi-
tors_ Policies encourage significant public and private
social areas, cuItu raI facilities, and scenic areas; and the
preservation of his#orical sites. Commercial Land Use
policies encourage identification and reservation of
sufficient sites suited for a variety of commercial uses_
Housing Goals
i iousing goals are directed toward providing
opportunities for all segments of the city's households;
suppor#ing existing neighborhoods and preserving
housing stock; maintaining high quality residential
environments; and providing assistance to housing
development for A. broad FAnge of deco€ graphics
including a diversity of ago and cconornic levels. These
t oAK aro supporled by policies whi,-h in€:lude. revip.w
of regulatory impediments to control of housing costs
and affirm alive measures to supp€art €.Onslru€:tion Of
housing for projected groups; encouraging expan-
siMl € f ty[]es Of hOusin[J available, in( lading HCC: ',0ry
dwelling units, mixed use, and multi -family housing;
flexible development standards; and reVisian of devel-
opment regulations such as the Special Distrlct of Five
C.0rn*FS and the F€xm-$8sed Code PFOVision9 herein.
Innovative, Green Building and Site Design Goals
The goals of this Special District Form -Based Code are:
1. To encourage innovative, green building, and site
design in housing and mixed -use projects by:
a. increasing the housing supply and the choice
of housing styles available in the community,
b. promoting workforce housing encouraging smaller
and more varied home sizes and mixes of income
levels,
c. promoting affordable housing by creating
diversity in housing affordability, and
d. promoting high quality sustainable design.
2. To encourage the use of innovative site
development practices and green building
construction practices by encouraging the use of
conservation design methods and principles such as;
low impact development techniques, green building
materials, water and energy conservation, and
mitigation that offsets impacts to bi o d i ve rs it y.
3. To encourage innovative development projects by:
a. identifying zoning code amendments, such as
Form -Based Code Special Districts, that are necessary
to support the development of innovative housing
choices in the City of Edmonds,
b. identifying effective incentives to encourage green
building and low impact development standards, and
c. building to LEED, Built Green, Evergreen, Passive
House or other certifiable program standards.
4. Coupled with the goals of innovative housing and
green building is an equally vital goal to provide hous-
ing opportunities within Activity Centers consistent
with land use, transportation and economic activities.
a. provide for mixed -use development with Activity
Centers,
b. plan for housing that is located with easy access
to transit and economic activities that provide jobs
and shopping opportunities, and
c. consider adjusting parking standards for
housing within Activity Centers to provide incentives
for lower -cost housing when justified by available
transit service.
Green Building, and Site Design Criteria
All units shall meet Built Green or LEE Certified rating
or equivalent as a requirement and shall meet a mini-
mum Green Factor Score of 0.3 per Section 5.0.
- 35
Packet Pg. 55
5.B.a
3.4 1 Green Building Construction and Housing Diversity Requirements
Affordable Housing Criteria
At least 10% of the units must meet the following
affordable housing criteria as defined below.
Affordable housing or affordable dwelling unit means
a dwelling unit for use as a primary residence by a
household in any of the income groups described
below, which may be rented or purchased without
spending more than 30 percent of monthly household
income including utilities other than telephone and
cable TV. Monthly household income is categorized
into the following five groups using the median
household income for the region:
Extremely low income <30% of median
household income
Very low income 31%-50% of median
MIT•>� ITSICRi •• mum -
Low income 51%-80%of median
household income
Moderate income 81%-95%ofmedian
household income
Middle income 95%- 120%of median
household income
Median household income means the amount
calculated and published by the United States
Department and Urban Development JHUD) each
year far the Seattle Metropolitan Statistical Area IMSA)
as the median household or family 1ncorne, adjusted
by Hk iD for household size. The department of
planning for the City of Edmonds shall Calcillate
annually the maximum purchase prices and maximum
rents app] icable to each of the Income groups
describ-d above..
Workforce Housing Criteria
To promote a balance in age demographics and
encourage age diversity, the City of Fdmonds
Economic Development Commission Is actively
enrouTaging a gfeater nurnber of dwelling units
targeting young professionals and young workers
thTQL19h vuork OHS a housing pmvisinns_
At least 10% of the unity mosI meet thR f011OWing
workforce housing unit size criteria as defined below.
orkFnre6+ lunisifig is chararleri,,ed by smal1Pr dwelling
unit sizes ranging between 800 5F and 14600 SF. Work -
farce housing provisions encourage a mix of unlit si?P5
exclusive of garages, that provide for a broad mix of
incorne lovr is and farraily size and age groups..
The criteria for workforce housing is to provide a mix
of unit sizes within a development that meet the
following standards:
Very small unit
< 900 SF
Small unit
900 SF - 1000 SF
Moderate unit
1001 SF - 1200 SF
Middle unit
1201 SF - 1400 SF
Largest unit
1401 SF - 1600 SF
Applicability
This Section is applicable to all properties located
within the Five Corners Special District. The Section
applies to innovative housing projects that are multi-
family, mixed -use multifamily developments. Since
the purpose of this provision is to meet the underlying
Comprehensive Plan Goals that support the inclusion
of both green building construction, affordable
dwelling units and workforce housing, the City will
promote a variety of bonus incentives as described
in Section 6.5.3.
Permitted uses in the Five Corners Form -Based Code
Special District shall comply with the standards
established for permitted uses in the city's
Neighborhood Business district.
Linkage to Code and Comprehensive Plan
The City of Edmonds Community Development Code
is intended to work with Section 3 Building Types
of the Form Based Code. See Section 16 of the
Municipal Code for allowed uses in the Five Corners
Special District.
Sources
City of Bainbridge Island Municipal Code
Section 18.38.090 HDDP Density incentive Summary,
11.12.2009.
Housing Within Reach: A Call to Action for Snohomish
County Communities. June 2008. Housing Consortium
of Everett and Snohomish County.
Westview Village, Vision & Form -Based Code, City
of San Buenaventura, California.
-36
Packet Pg. 56
5.B.a
4.01 Civic Investment: Streetscape & Public apace Standards
4.11 Purpose, Principles and Intent
Purpose
This section identifies the street, streetscape, and
public space standards allowed within the Five Corners
Special District (as indicated in the Regulating Frame-
work) in order to ensure that proposed development
is consistent with the City of Edmonds goals for
character and quality of the public realm of the street.
Principles and Intent
The Five Corners Special District Plan calls for the
maintenance of existing public road alignments but
with enhancements and modifications to facilitate
non -motorized movement. Design treatments
have been established for proposed streets that are
appropriate to the vehicular and pedestrian use of
each street, as well as the adjacent land uses. The
intent of the proposed system is not only to establish
street types that serve regional, district, and local
access needs, but also to integrate the Five Corners
Special District with the surrounding neighborhoods,
especially as they connect to downtown Edmonds,
transit hubs, and public open space. A core principle
of the Five Corners Special District Plan is that the
public environment created by the streets is of great
importance. Local streets carry much of the life of a
mixed -use urban district; encouraging residents or
visitors to waIkr biker or drive to one's home, office,
store, or park.
Proposed Street Types
A consistent streetr Cape grog ram i5 reglaired to emu re
that a unified street scape Is developed. Streetscape
concepts have been developed to reinforce the several
different street types within the Flve Corners Special
District.
Individual streets are c:lassifled by MOV@ earit I yi -
Movemcnt type describes the expected driver
experience, asfoIlows in Table 4.1-1
Street Name
Movornerit Type
212th k a Main St.
(;I) free
$twrfnin Way
Sh1 slow
$41k Ave -west
ibl slaw
Table 4,1.7
4.2 1 Streetscape Design standards
This section illustrates various the street types within
the street network for the Five Corners Special District.
The requirements set forth in this section work
with the frontage standards and building standards
describers by the Regulating Framework to provide
the inforrrotion with which to modify existing streets.
The following street sections represent proposed
design changes to each street type in the Five Corners
Special District They do not represent approved
or final designs. Final design will be reviewed and
a pproved by the City of Ed monds-
(a) Free: Drivers can expect to travel generally with minimal delay at the
design speed; street design supports safe pedestrian movement separated
and protected from vehicle movement This movement type is appropriate
for thoroughfares designed to traverse longer distances or connect to
h ig her density locations. Design speed is 35mph.
(b) Slnw: Drivers should expect to proceed carefully with an occasional
stop to allow pedestrians to cross or another car to park. The character of
the street should make drivers uncomfortable exceeding the design speed
due to presence of pedestrian amenities, parked tars, enclosure, and other
design elements. Design speed is 25mph.
- 37
Packet Pg. 57
5.B.a
4.2 1 Streetscape Design Standards
212th Street Southwest & Main
Proposed Approach
The proposed aiterat ions maintain bath streets as major ea5tfwest connections but focus additionally
on enhancing the pedestr[an experience and strengthening each street as via bie corrlmerclal space for
cammuniIy residents. Amenities include transparent Staref ronIS, Street trees. hike lane.., and pedL-strian
scaled streetilghts.
Thoroughfare Type.
trlovanene
R GA W dth
DH1gn sp+ed;
I-andseape_
Tralfnr Laties'
ai ke Lbtic
parking'
YIwM^trl�er { rrrl�iq I]I5ihi5fl�r
Sidewalks'
Table +4.2
Fig. 4.1
Section a- a' ; Main St; iooki ng northeast from
proposed roundAma crosswalk
Secdon In - b� 2,12th St SW' looking east toward
prup+ased r mdat iut
commercW street
Iree
Eli]'
9 mph
sire" Imes planed In curb c1Fts between parking
41; One III w.tiy
VbScn h sides of strew
Tparallel pwiTking k)whsldes DIFureet
4h,
IF
on" VNEW
jr
01 ,w G
{kl Id: e
tnJklln�
Illw
Gnp
�{
k
1 k+11
rr� G
I
I
Iry ! + I
tke :anirbsn
wlb.
•
%idrwak ylLur Lw Ix`
irAW� lr.we1
t' i 14'
rl! •JtrLlr III if&WA*L wtb•tk
i i' 7'7'TS��
�
4uilsttriueb
FIg.4.2
Rio W d0•
NO7 10 SLA LE- FL r illuUrativa pui Nv%Lei uIIIy-
Packet Pg. 58
5.B.a
4.2 1 Streetscape Design Standards
Bowdoin Way
Proposed Approach
The proposed alterations maintal n the street's existing character while on haneing the quality of the
pedestrian expereience. Increased seIhacks provide more open space near the future roundabout. Existing
topography enccurag es bioswale on north side of street- PafaIleI parking wiII slow Iraffic and increase
pedestrian activity.
F6g-.4-2-5eWma-a% tooMrw.;mutWertfrmp"Vosad
rauDawb t
ThoroughhreTyp,t:
e"rn iial s[ree[
Wid woffWnt!
slow
R.QW YYadth:
54'
Nsign Sped;
25 mph
Landscape:
south side - scree[ trees pU n[ed do bulb -outs
IHer.� ec ry r}ti kiurl; riprth yids• IJe(i}milr
w1klr ny+Mlrmxa hrl'C rM 113VA1111 111Lmdnrl41131 nor
Tralfrc Lame
south side 14; north side 14' w! sharsow lane
Bike Lane:
south side 5'; north side shairow lane
Pa(king:
T pOrallel parking 4n south side of stmet
t' urh to {: a rkr I }l'.l. mi r-
4 V
Sidewalks:
S'
TableA,3
Id
� ��d' fr�rNk P��P Iw nxM rtr�iyurrewlw iq vxalr stl�w� 7�Cr�' r
r i i8r IV r IF d' 14------ 4
r.rtire errt .
ar
maw — -�
NPtlS:
J. Sebatkswlll Mary for those parcels frorttiAg the proposed r&undabourt. 5eelrun[age fHquim%men[s in 12eguia[in4 FramewarL
NOTTQ SCALE - For illustrative purposes only.
39
Packet Pg. 59
5.B.a
4.2 1 Streetscape Design Standards
84th Avenue West
Proposed Approach
The proposed alterations maintain existing right of way while bias ales fncrease the street's etiological
function and bike lanes enhance connectivity along proposed circling route.
Fib, 4.3
Sr-clion al -d= luokrnq north Gom proposrd rou"daixgn
Section b - b', looki ng south from proposed roundab mt
N-g;mi
huddr
rm.r
StreetTypa;
Makemerlt
R.Ow width!
oesw Speed:
Landscape
TraHrc Unex
glk[. L,Uw!
Parking;
Curb tpcurb pls#ance-
5i41�JdCkk
T.Ude 4A
cammerd&l SUM
slow
150'
2S mph
bloswaias S sirm %roes pawed 3Cron cemer
10: one each way
rW k.fih}idt..; c3fHit- 5trrrtr
nnne
3'
wbmk sadmA - iwado fare uawel travea Uoe wale jkkw9W mbbck
10, 6 T7' 71T S'
� raablacurB I
3Y
Fig. 4.4
1 FCO,hN GO'
NOT TO SCALE - For Ilfustratixe purposes only,
.K.
Packet Pg. 60
5.B.a
4.3 1 Public Space Standards
In the Five Corners Special District -and within the
larger context of the City of Edmonds -there are
multiple opportunities to enhance public space for
recreational use, pedestrian activity, and ecological
health. Future development of the Five Corners Special
District shall capitalize on these opportunities to
strengthen the overall character of the District's
overall public space.
Public Space
Public space shall enhance and promote the
environmental quality and the aesthetic character of
the Five Corners Special District in the following ways:
(a) the landscape shall define, unify and enhance the
public realm; including streets, parks, plazas, and
sidewalks;
(b) the landscape shall be sensitive to its
environmental context and utilize plant species that
reduce the need for supplemental irrigation water; and
(c) the landscape shall cleanse and detain storm water
on site by utilizing a combination of biofiltration,
permeable paving and subsurface detention methods.
Additionally, The City of Edmonds has the opportunity
to RXpAnd and enhance the puhhri sp ace of the Fire
Corners Special District by acquiring or leasing the
Fmr€:el irTimerlialely he. hind the Jererrtiah eriter-
Currently parcel is just outside the site boundaries of
the Five C€ rner5 $p2cial District bait if it ►uIerf� aggUired
by the city or integrated into future development
plans, it € OUId serve as space fOr a far rraer's market,
local event space, small park, or recreatlonaI activities,
artid therefore FrR'COrrip valued FRINic %Faa€:e fOF I he
community -
Public Space: S usta in a b i I ity
The goal for the overall landscape design of public
spaces is to create a unifiedr harmonious, socially
vibrant, and ap5thetically pleasing environment that
also integrates sustainable concepts and solutions
that FOSWH� rtidturaJ fUnttiOns Hnd The
public right of way and urbaMstreet runoff becomes
an eXV�nsi[In Of OXisting d1Ainage PAthways and the
natural ecology
Water efficient landscaping will be introduced to
reduce irrigation requirements based on a soil/
climate analysis to determine the most appropriate
indigenous/native-in-character, and drought tolerant
plants. All planted areas, except for lawn and seeded
groundcover, will receive a surface layer of specified
recycled mulch to assist in the retention of moisture
and reduce watering requirements, while minimizing
weed growth and reducing the need for chemical
herbicide treatments..
Where irrigation is required, high efficiency irrigation
technology with low-pressure applications such
as drip, soaker hose, rain shut- off devices, and
low volume spray will be used. The efficiency
and uniformity of a low water flow rate reduces
evaporation and runoff and encourages deep
percolation. After the initial growth period of three to
seven years, irrigation may be limited in accordance
with City requirements then in place.
The location and selection of all new tree planting will
adhere to'green infrastructure' principles by visually
expressing the underlying interconnectivity of the
neighborhood. Species selection will be in character
with the local and regional environment, and
comprised of an appropriate mix of evergreen and
deciduous trees. Trees will be used to define the
landscape character of recreation and open space
areas, identify entry points, and reinforce the legibility
of the neighborhood by defining major and minor
thoroughfares for pedestrians, bicycles, and vehicles.
Stormwater; Raid and snow melt that runs
off of rooftops and paved 5u rfaces. Often picks
up pollutants such as oil, pesticides and waste-
Typi€:allyr storrnwater flaws int0 a st€ Frn dfiain,
or directly into a water body, and has been
identified as a primary cause of degradation
to local streams, rivers and Pugets Sound,
41
Packet Pg. 61
5.B.a
4.4 1 Bikeway Standards
Proposed development in the Five Corners Special
District should provide bikeways for both short and
long distance movement. A bikeway is defined as a
continuously designated segment of the public right-
of-way that provides exclusive, preferential, or equal
priority for bicycle travel. It includes the riding surface
and any curbs, markings, and protective barriers, and
any plantings, lighting, and furniture that are specific
only to the bikeway. The 2009 Edmonds Transportation
Plan requires that the regional bikeway network
should be well -integrated with the regional and local
transit network and that bicycle parking facilities be
provided.
As the bikeway plan is an integral component of
the Five Corners Special District, it is the intent of
the plan that:
(a) civic and institutional destinations shall adapt their
facilities to accommodate bicyclists;
(b) bicycling shall be recognized as an essential form
of transportation and recreation within neighborhoods
and throughout the region; and
(c) new thoroughfares in urban contexts shall be
designed to target speeds that are safe for bi<yrlists
and provide appropriate markings For cyclist safety -
The Streetscape Standards (Section 4-2) identify two
types of bikeways as part of the I'Ive C,OFners Special
District plan:
(a) bicycle lane: as defined by Section 21.10.010 of
the 2011 City of Edmonds Municipal Code a bicycle
lane is a lane reserved for bicycle travel designated by
striping or curbs on an improved street right-of-way;
and
(b) sharrow: a lane that is shared by both bicycles and
automobiles. The lanes have special arrow markings to
alert cars to take caution and allow cyclists to travel in
these lanes when striping is not passible.
Design standards for the bicycle lane shall be derived
from the City of Edmonds- See Table 3-6 and Figure
3-8 of the 2009 Edmonds Transpo rta Lion Plan.
4.5 1 Stormwater Management
As outlined in Chapter 18.30 of the 2011 City of
Edmonds Municipal Code, the city has two broad
goals regarding the management of stormwater:
(a) to protect water resources and reduce the
discharge of pollutants to the maximum extent
practicable to local receiving waters; and
(b) to control storm water runoff generated by
development, redevelopment, construction sites.
Stormwater and hydrology components will be
integrated into the Five Corners Special Districts to
restore and maintain natural functions and processes,
mitigate negative environmental impacts.
Public rights -of -way, proposed open space and
parking lots will filter and infiltrate stormwater to the
maximum extent feasible to protect the natural stream
systems and the receiving waters of Puget Sound.
This ecological concept transcends the Five Corners
Special District site to positively affect the surrounding
neighborhoods, stream corridors, and the regional
watershed.
The two primary objectives of the proposed
stormwater and hydrology components are:
(a) to reduce volume and rate of runoff; and
(b) to eliminate or minimize runoff pollutants through
natural filtration.
These objectives will be met, to the extent feasible, by:
(a) maximizing pervious areas;
(b) maximizing the use of trees;
(c) controlling runoff into bioswales and biofiltration
strips;
(d) utilizing permeable paving surfaces where
applicable and feasible;
(e) utilizing portions of parks and recreational spaces
as detention basin; and
(f) removing sediments and dissolved pollutants from
runoff.
- 42
Packet Pg. 62
5.B.a
4.6 1 Civic Roles in Parking
New development occurs in the Five Corners Special
District, has the opportunity to utilize a lower standard
for required parking than was previously permitted
under City code (see Section 5.4). This suggests the
City should take an active role in promoting various
parking solutions. Appropriate parking solutions
can have many implications for the District and for
the City as a whole, including economic health, air
quality, traffic congestion and safety issues. The City
of Edmonds, therefore, has the opportunity to address
the issue of parking proactively and from a civic
improvement perspective, including the options
listed below:
• Retaining on -street parking wherever feasible,
• Building parking structures -these may remain
in public ownership or be reimbursed through
development fees,
• Creating an improvement district to fund shared
parking facilities, and
• Negotiating shared parking agreements between
property owners.
It is recommended that future development in the
Five Corners Special District include above -grade
parking structures and/or shared parking facilities for
adjacent residences, businesses, and office spaces.
Development and improvement of off-street parking
facilities to be shared for the purpose of meeting the
requirements, both public and private, is a desirable
and feasible alternat ve and improves the safety and
free flow of both pedestrians and vehicular traffic_
in addition, shared parking facilities are particularly
appropriate for the Five Corners Special District
because in a mixed -use development diverse activities
have different peals demand times. For example, an
office cornplex and restau rant could share parking,
since the office peak will be during the workday and
the restaurant demands will peak during evening
hO LLr i_
As the City of Edmonds mores for wArd with its pIAris
for the Five Corners Special District, it should recognize
that parking structures and shared parking facilities
are catalyzing amenities for future development_
All parking facilities within the Five Corners Special
District shall be regu lated according to the City of
Edmonds design standards for such facilities.
Mixed -use, A combination of retail, residential.
Offito and r:omrnonity gerVictz Spa[es in r3rW
building or on ore parcel.
a
Packet Pg. 63
5.B.a
5.01 Private Investment: Gathering Spaces
& Green Features Standards
5.11 Purpose, Principles and Intent
Purpose
This section identifies the types of amenity spaces
and green open space allowed within the Five Corners
Special District, as indicated by the Regulating
Framework, and provides design standards for
each type, to ensure that proposed development is
consistent with the City of Edmonds goals for character
and quality of the places surrounding the buildings
on private property within the Five Corners area. This
section also describes the Green Factor requirements
that apply to each development within Five Corners.
Principles and Intent
The intent of the proposed system is not only to
establish amenity spaces that serve the community
and local needs, but also to provide for the protection
and enhancement of natural resources for the benefit
of the greater community. Core principles of the Five
Corners Special District plan are to promote:
• an environment that encourages and facilitates
pedestrian activity —'walkable" streets that are
comfortable, efficient, safe, and interesting; and
• coherence of the public -right -of -war, serving to
assist residents, building owners and managers with
understanding the relationship between the public -
right -of -way and their own properties; and
• snstainab! lity by proviiding for trees and plants which
contribute to privacy, the reduction of noise and air
pollution, shade, maintenance of the natural habitat,
conservation of water and rainwater management.
Regulating Framework. The Regulating Framewor#
is the principal tool for implementing the Special
€)ktriet Forrn-Based Cores_ It provide, standards
for the deveIoprnE rnt of each property or Ior
and illustrates how each relates to the a6jacent
properties and street space.
,44
Packet Pg. 64
5.B.a
5.21 Green Factor Requirements and Fulfillment
In this Special District Form -Based Code, Seattle's
Green Factor is used to achieve ecological and
livability functions.This code for Five Corners utilizes
Seattle's Green Factor system. As a model for the City
of Edmonds, the Seattle Green Factor serves as an ex-
cellent precedent to use as a measure in future private
development projects. The revitalization of the Five
Corners neighborhood in Edmonds can be optimized
when planning incorporates function for multiple
systems. Including green, conservation, and habitat
elements in development plans, benefit all users of
the site. The Green Factor complements the future
thinking of the City of Edmonds Comprehensive
Plan. An overview of Seattle's Green Factor is
provided below.
Overview
Seattle's Green Factor is intended to improve livability
and benefit ecological functions, increasing the
quantity of landscape in private developments. It
is constructed as a framework intended to allow
flexibility within its implementation, with a point
rating system. Projects are calculated far landscape
elements, plantings, and certain built features.
Landscape elements include depth of soil and biore-
tettitlon faCilitieS. Credits for plaritirig s are PHFned
based upon quantity and size of trees, and shrubs.
Built features such as green roofs, vegetated walls
and permeable paving add credits with specified
installations, Bonus inclo sions of qu iiIilemfntary
elements such as drought tolerant and native
Plants, rainWa%-F irrigation, poblit visibility and food
cultivation, further add to credit totals. Scoring
priorities Come from livability considerdtiOnS, an
overall decrease in Impervious surfaces and climate
change adaptation_ The functional berief its target a
reduction In stormater runoff, a decrease in building
energy, a reduction in greekihouse gas emissions,
and an increase in habitat space,
The Green Factor for the Five Corners Special District
uses for reference the Seat I le Green Factor tools. They
include the Green Factor Worksheet and Score Sheet,
guidelines for a regtriFed Landscape Mil nagemQnt
Plan, and a Plant List; examples are Included in
AiaiaeridiCeS5-aand 54>_The Clirnateand geography
of the City of Edmonds are similar to the applicable
areas of Seattle's Green Factor; the 2010 GrOen Factor
Plant List Is very well suited for a re commended
vegetation palette_ Standards and Requirements
for the Seattle Green Factor are Included in the
Seattle Department of Planning and Development
(DPD) Director's Rule 10-2011, clarifying Landscape
Standards and Green Factor in Seattle's Land Use Code
(Title 23).
Application and Implementation
The Five Corners Special District is currently zoned
Neighborhood Business, BN (Chapter 16.45 of
Edmonds Municipal Code), which corresponds with
Seattle's Commercial and Neighborhood Commercial
zoning designations relevant to the Seattle Green
Factor. Each private development project shall achieve
a minimum total of .30 Green Factor score. The score
is a sum total (not a percentage) and is achieved by
scores earned through implementation of a variety
of green features. Values are assigned within the
Green Factor scoresheet, and based upon lot size.
Calculations for the score include required right-of-
way improvements, though the square footage of
the lot size calculation does not include this area.
The target of .30 for Five Corners is based upon
comparison with Seattle surrounding areas having
similar zoning. Min i mum scores are set for typical
development and reasonable achievements for Green
Factor application. Higher Green Factor scores can be
used to achieve points for bonus stories. See Section
5.5 for bonus provisions.' Detailed explanation of
the Green Factor features and scoring options can be
found in Functional Landscapes: Assessing Elements
of Seattle Green Factor: www.seattle.gov/dpd/cros/
g rou pslpa nl@pan1...Iweb...Idpdp016505.pdf
Upon scrutiny of Green Factor success in Seattle this
approach is well -suited for application to Five Corners.
Utilizing the Green Factor criteria for City of Edmonds
redevelopment projects strengthens standards and
rules of the Edmonds Municipal Code, Landscaping
Requirements (Chapter 20.13), especiallyGeneral
Design Standards (Chapter 20.13.020), and Landscape
Types (Chapter 20.13.030). Additionally, it is to be
used with current and revised Land Use Plans and
Policies (Title 15).
Using Green Factor with Other Requirements
While green features may count for both Green Factor
calculations and percentages of Amenity Space, the
requirements for each need to be met. Amenity Space
is usable open space with dimensions; for recreational
and passive leisure use. (See section 5.4 for additional
Amenity Space description). In conjunction with
the Green Factor requirements, the percentage of
Amenity Space for Five Corners is 15% of lot size,
to be addressed within each development project,
Packet Pg. 65
5.B.a
5.21 Green Factor Requirelments and Fulfil Iment
or cooperatively aggregated between projects. The
Amenity Space requirement i5 proposed to support,
and be supported by, Open Space Intentions within
the Edmonds Comprehensive Plan, and replace Open
Space refefences (Chapter 16,65) of the Edmonds
MunidpaI Code. <,, Is this true s> - Open space
allotments, green features and amenity space with!n
the live Corners Special District are essential for visual
appeal and varlety in the pattern of development,
As an elenient of the ReVjsioning document for
the Nve Corners Special District commercial center,
a Green Factor approach is induded in this Special
District dorm -leased Code, this is intended as a
complement to, and to be utilized in conjunctlori
with, the Edmonds Storrnwater Management Code
section (Chapter 18.30) of the Edmonds AA;nicipal
Code, and Supplements to this Code, including
Stormwater Management Requirements (Chapter
1 S. 30.060)- The Green Factor approach is also to be
non- contradictory W StorrrhWater nnan@.Vrnent Stan,
dard5 revised in respon5e to the Western Washington
Phase JI Municipal Stormwater Permit. The city of
Edmonds follows "best management" practices
and operates under this permit issued by state
Department of Ecology -
Green Factor Categories:
Landscape Elements
• Landscaped Areas (categories for soil
depth over or under 24 inches)
• Bio-retention Facilities
• Plantings (mulch and ground cover)
- Shrubs and Perennials
• Tree Canopy (based on tree sizes)
• Greezn Acicifs
• Vegetated walls
• Approved Water Features
- Permeable Paving
• Structural Sol] Systems
• Bonuses for Drou g ht To lera nt Plants,
f iarvested Rain water, Food Cultivation, etC-
For a complete description, see: Seattle DPD: Seattle
Green Factor: http://www.seattle.gov/dpd/Permits/
GreenFactor/Overview/; and Functional Landscapes:
Assessing Elements of Seattle Green Factor: www.
seattle.gov/dpd/cms/groups/pan/@pan/.../web.../
d pd p016505. pdf
1 Adopted For Seattle's commercialzones in 2006,
the Department of Planning and Development's
incentives and score sheet for the Green Factor are based
upon precedents from Berlin, Germany, and Malmo,
Sweden, in the 1990s. Seattle was the first city in the
U.S. to implement this type of program. The Seattle
version was initially part of the Neighborhood Business
District Strategy, which revised city commercial zoning
requirements. Currently, the landscape requirements
apply to new development in commercial areas and
neighborhoods outside of the downtown core. As a result,
marry of the conditions addressed by the Green Factor are
quite similar to those of the Five Corners neighborhood.
Sources
1. City of Seattle, Department of Planning &
Development: Director's Rule 10-2011. Clarifying
Landscapes, including the Seattle Green Factor. PDF
file at: http://www.seattle.gov/dpd/Permits/
Green Factor/O ve r v i ewe
2. Edmonds City Code: http://www.mrsc.org/wa/
edmonds/index-dtSeavch.html
3. Edmonds Comprehensive Plan:
http://www.ci.edmonds.wa.us/plan-ref.stm#CompPlan
4. Functional Landscapes: Assessing Elements of
Seattle Green Factor: 2008 Internship Report, www.
scattle.gov/dpd/cms/groups/pan/@pan/ ... /web...l
d pd p016505. pdf
5. Seattle DPD: Seattle Green Factor. http://
www.scattle.gov/dpd/Pevmits/GreenFactor/Ovevview/
- 46
Packet Pg. 66
5.B.a
5.3 1 Open Space Standards
The Five Corners Special District shall consist of two
types of open space: Amenity Space and Green Open
Space.
Amenity Space
Amenity space is designed to provide residents of all
ages with a variety of outdoor experiences. Although
the character of these amenity spaces will differ, they
form the places that encourage residents and visitors
alike to spend time in the company of others or to
find solitude.
All new development shall provide a minimum
of 15% of parcel size to amenity space. Additional
amenity space above the 15% base requirement
is encouraged and can be part of the development's
Green Factor plan outlined in Section 5.2.
The types of Amenity Space include:
(a) Lawns: An open space, available for unstructured
recreation. A lawn may be spatially defined by land-
scaping rather than building frontages. Its landscape
shall consist of lawn and trees and shall provide
a minimum of 60% planted pervious surface area
(5uch as a turf, groundcover, soil or mulch_)
(b) Plazas: An open space, available for civic purposes
and commercial activities. A plaza shalt be spatially
defined primarily by building facades, with strong
connections to interior uses. Its landscape shall
consist primarily of pavement. Frees are encouraged,
Plazas shall be located between buildings and at the
in#ersectiorx of important streets. Plazas shall provide
a rninimurn of 20% planted pervious surface area
(such as a rain garden, bioswale, turf, groundcover.
soil or mulch). The remaining balance may be any
paved surface with a maximum 30% impervious
paved surface.
(c) Squares: An open space available for unstructured
recreation and curio purposes. A square is spalially
defined by building facades with strong connections
to interior uses. Its landscape shall consist of paths.
lawns and trees with a minimum of 20% planted
pervious surface area (such as a rain garden, bioswa le,
Wrlf groundcover, soil or mulch), The remaining
balance may be any paved surface with a maximum
30% impervious paved surface.
(d) Arco ssibIs Careen Rooftops, ACCe9sible green
rooftops can confer significant added value to
building 5 mr upjnts a to the general puIIIit with
benefits ranging from enhanced educational
opportunities for schools,"roofparks", hortuculturaI
therapy, and even food production.
(e) Sidewalks: The purpose of sidewalks is to provide
safe, convenient, and pleasant pedestrian circulation
along all streets, access to shopfronts and businesses,
and to improve the character and identity of
commercial and residential areas consistent with
the City of Edmonds vision. New development
meeting the standards of this plan are allowed to
use a portion of the sidewalk area within the public
right-of-way for outdoor seating, temporary displays,
or other uses provided that pedestrian movement
is accommodated.
Green Open Space
The goal for the overall open space in the Five Corners
Special District is to create a unified, harmonious, and
aesthetically pleasing environment that also integrates
sustainable concepts and solutions that restore natural
functions and processes. In addition to amenity
space, the Westgate Special District shall, therefore,
be comprised of green open space, which includes:
(a) Trees: The location and selection of all new tree
planting will express the underlying interconnectivity
of the neighborhood. Species selection will be in
character with the local and regional environment,
and comprised of an appropriate mix of evergreen
and deciduous trees. Trees will be used to define the
landscape character of recreation and amenity space
areas, identify entry points, and reinforce the legibility
of the neighborhood by defining major and minor
thoroughfares for pedestrians, bicycles and vehicles.
• All new development shall preserve existing trees
wherever feasible.
• All new development shall plant new trees in
accordance with the Edmonds Municipal Code
Chapter 20.13.
(b) Steep Slopes: New development shall retain
all existing trees and vegetation on slopes
exceeding 15%.
(c) 5tormwater Management: Stormwater runoff
from sidewalks shall be conveyed to planted parkways.
Overflow from parkways and runoff from the roadways
will be directed into bioswales and/or pervious
paving in parallel parking areas, located along the
street edges, where it can infiltrate into the ground.
Perforated curbs through which street stormwater
runoff can flow to open vegetated swales can also
be provided, wherever feasible.
- 47
Packet Pg. 67
5.B.a
5.4 1 Parking Standards
The Five Corners Special District parking standards
are intended to reinforce that the area is pedestrian -
oriented and intended to be equally accessible
by people on foot, on bicycles, in wheelchairs, or
travelling by motorized vehicles. These standards
strive to:
(a) maximize on -street parking; and
(b) encourage the development of shared parking; and
(c) promote density and diversity of the built
environment.
In addition to the parking requirements outlined by
building type in Section 3.0, design standards for
parking lots include the following.
(a) All off-street surface parking lots shall be set back
at least 1Q'from the Required Building Line of each lot.
(b) No off-street surface parking lot shall occupy more
than seventy percent (70%) of the total lot.
(c) No parcel shall be used principally as a parking lot
unless provided on the Regulating Framework.
(d) The edge of any surface parking lot shall be planted
with shrubs or street trees, planted at an average
distance not to exceed thirty (30) teet on center and
a]igned three 0) to seven (/) feet behind the common
lot line. This requirement: may be reduced for parking
tot edges abutting parking on adjacent ]ot5, see item
a a" below,
(e) A minimum tree -canopy € ovearnge of 513% in
10 years and and no less than 80% in 20 years.
(f) Fdges along any common tot Iine shA11 have a
setback of at least (1) foot of the common lot line_
(g) Parking lot pathways are to be provided every four
rows of parking and a maximum distance of 180 feet
shall be maintained between paths. Pathways shall
connect with major building entries or other sidewalks,
pathways, and destinations, and rnust be univer,ally
accessible and meet ADA standards.
(h) Landscaping in parking lots shall integrate with
on -site pathways, include permeable pavements
or bios wales where feasible, and minimize use of
impervious pavement
(i) Where a parking lot is abutting another parking lot
on an adjacent parcel, a connection between lots is
strongly encouraged, to facilitate circulation within
Five corners and to reduce the need for vehicles to
return to the street when traveling between sites.
-48
Packet Pg. 68
5.B.a
6.0 [ Administration and Implementation
6.11 Purpose, Principles and Intent
Purpose
This Section identifies the building types
administrative procedures for proposed development
within the Five Corners Special District, and provides
for measures to implement the plan.
Principles and Intent
The intent of this section is to ensure that private
development is consistent with the provisions of The
ReVisioning Five Corners: A Special District Form Based
Code standards related to street, frontage, building,
and public space and green feature types.
6.2 1 Administrative Review
A staff planner will be assigned to coordinate the
technical review process for each new proposed
development within the Five Corners Special District.
Staff will first review the application and evaluate
whether the project meets zoning ordinance, as
well as general goals and objectives. During the
design review and approval process, stuff will ensure
compliance following the requirements imposed
by the Afchitecture Review Board (ARB) or other
designated authority, The staff planner will coordinate
the application process with other city d.epartrnents,
including Parks and Recreation, Ingineering, Public
Works,, Polite and Fire departments.
A trained staff member will review the Green Factor
application and assign a point value (see Section 5_2).
de;e,r•�rala�
ADB
rlli'Cn{hlElt 'i' isnle5
estahlrshecl pti,B„
Cbnildl+-
Y
FbiqulredFkv ADS Public
[epival k4eti^91w a1p9
R69n JJjrinp Place 11 *� , .,,e 7) App ml
Y * r
Y Y r
r r
1Y r
r !'€_ Yes
r ,
r
I
Y � iF.Plh Ay�ea I
t i saHE
1 �«
--__________________________--__ �iDesw appe-al
Development. Includes any Improvement to
property open to exterior view, such as bui€dings,
%tFUCtitfes, fiXJUF S., lar16SCOP41(}, SiJO $A rFognirt9,
signs, parkins} lots, Iighting, pedestrian facilities,
street furniture, use of open areas: whether all or
any are pUbGcly or privately sporl5ored-
6. .1 1 Design Review
District -based design review is applied to any area or
district that has adopted design guidelines or design
standards that apply specifically within that area
or district. 'The Five Corners Special District rneets
the City's requirements for Design Rear€ew, in accord
with Chapter 20.12 of the Edmonds Munidpal Code.
and development will folIaw the Design Review
process (Hg_ 6.1). I his ensures muftiple reviews by the
Architecture Review Board (ARB) and pu b I i c hearing
at two stages of design_ 30-percent and plans required
for building permit. The ARB is ultimately responsible
to interpret the goals, standards, and requirements
established by the Plan and determine if the
appplication is within compliance.
nal� A3klic11a^ I 4� Mrr,rtie„e& Pe,rrrt
0e k toC.[ &Ces;;nCedslon A,pwoyed
Fi&6,1-D►sWRwAawforMajorPunya,dapadfiamOrd 16 62,2007
49
Packet Pg. 69
5.B.a
6. .21 Desxgrt Review ApplicabiIity
Design Review process is specifically required for any development project within the boundaries of Five
Corners Special District falling into at least one of the fvllo%ding3 categories:
- All proposed deVelOpments that requires a threshold dete minatian under the State ErkvirOnmentaI
Policy Act (SEPA), including arry alterations to the building footprint.
- Any €ievefopment seeking to use the height bonus provisions (see section 6_5).
- Alteration of any existing structure that affects 50-percent or more of the exterior appearance
of a buildiPg or fF0F1Tai)e type visible from a public 6ghl-of-w+ay or public open space.
Sits irnpr�;verrrents triggered onder Green Factor Review {see Seoion 5,2}_
All other development must adhere to existing code and not lead to further r,oncorJiZ;rrnance witlti the
Five Corners plan, Such proposals may be approved by Aclminlstrative Review as a Type I decis Ion using the
process set forth in Edmonds Municipal Code 20.i 2.030, Specific actions exempt from design re+riew within
the Five Corners Special District are cued in the Edmonds Municipal Code 20-10,020 8_
6.3 1 Non -Conforming Uses
and Structures
It is the intent of this docornent to regulate
nonconforming uses and structures because they
have been found to be incompatible with the
pormitted uses and dimensional requirements set
forth in Five Cornea }plan_ the purpose is to encourage
the discontinuance of nonconforming uses and
structures, including buildings that do not meet
the Required Building Line. However, nothing herein
contained shall be construed as prohibiting the
change in tenancy, ownership, of managernent
Of a nonconforming lot. user or strucurre. provided
such change is otherwise lawful.
6.4 1 Departures
In those circurnstanoes where the applicant believes
that, due to unique characteristics of the site or other
special circumstances, a compliance with the Five
Corners pIAn is not feasible or desirable and that
deviation may be allow for equal or better results,
the applicant may be granted a departure relative
to the specific provision(s) in question.
Where a design guideline allows for a departure,
then a departure rn4y be granted under the followirwg
circumstances;
- I he applicant r-nu st demonstrate that the intent
and objectives of the design guidelines are being
met; and
The applicant must demonstrate that the project
has provided Other design r,lements that mare
than mitigate the minor impacts that could be
caused by the departure.
Staff may grant a design departure for guidelines
using "shall" The design departure shall be processed
as a Staff Decision, Notice Req Ui red_ The APB may also
grant a design departure for guldelInes using "shall"
The design departure shall be processed as prodded
In Edmonds Municipal Code <<20. 0??>>,
Packet Pg. 70
5.B.a
6.5 1 Height Bonus
6.5.1 1 Height Bonus Development
Agreement
An applicant may participate in a Development
Agreement with the City of Edmonds at the time of
project permit application as cited in Ord.. 3817 § 7,
2010; Ord. 3736 § 4. The purpose of the Development
Agreement is to specify Affordable Housing, Housing
Unit Size, Green Building Program, Sustainable Sites,
Amenity Space, and Alternative Transportation
required for extra floor height. The Agreement also
clarifies how the project will be phased, the required
timing of public improvements, the developer's
contribution toward funding system -wide community
improvements, and other conditions.
A Development Agreement is a contract detailing the
obligations of the developer and the City of Edmonds.
This must be reviewed by the city attorney and subject
to reviews by the Administrative Review, Design
Review and public hearing.
ReVis ion ing Five Corners!A Special Di stri ct Form -Based Code
6.5.2 1 Height Bonus Score sheet
The Height Bonus Score Sheet is to be filled out by
the applicant to illustrate the extra provision offered
in exchange for the extra height bonus. The Height
Bonus Score sheet becomes part of the Design
Checklist established by the staff planner to be
reviewed during the ARB.
A total of eight points are required to receive one
story of extra floor height. To ensure that the proposed
development addresses the community's desire for
more open space, at least one point must come from
either the Green Factor or the Amenity Space category.
Amenity Space: The variety of outdoor spaces
required of all future development, which includes
lawns, plazas, squares, accessible rooftops, and
sidewalks_
Careen Factor. A frameworks Intended to increase
ecological and livability qua]ity of landscape in
private developments, provides incentives for
soils, biofetention facilities, planted arras, trees,
permeable paving. etc_
Packet Pg. 71
5.B.a
6.5.3 1 Height Bonus Score Sheet
Nereq
Number of unit€, I(M
Credit I
Number of units, 15%
Credit 2
N umber of units, 20%
CnMh 3
Number of units, 7.q%
Credit 4
N umber of unite, k M%
Prereq.
Humber of units c 900sq. It„ 10%
Prereq.
No units, 1,600sq. ft.
Credit 1
N umber of units < 900 sq- ft. 20%
CieditI
NLimber afunit s5001000sq,ft.10%
CneO 3
Number of units 1001-1200 sq, ft' l04h
Criwdkt4
Number of units 1201-1400 tq, ft. 10%
Ll 11
Required
3
4
Required
Required
T
1
1
Preleq. RuiltGm4m*fLEER*Ceitifrec Rd;iiiyorequiwWilt R,:ciuu,:c1
Crud[ 1 kFED-Sil"rUingtftiStGmen-4-5fEvergreenSusta4nableDeueIupment5tandards I
Creditl LEED-Go1dR,iting 2
Credh3 PassiveHouseSrandardtLEED'PIN10LIMPM1M 3
Cfedit4 Llving9ulldInq- 4
Preieq, Green Factor Score 0.3
C+iit 1 Crum Factor Scare 0.4
CFWu Z Green Factor Scum US
CoAk3 Green Factor5care0.6
Credit 4 Green Factor Scow 2t 02 Sustainabpe Sites InkiativO.ar equWlem
Prare%
Parcentageofamanityspace oflot sIz215°k
Credo1
Perot n"aofamepityspace oflot sIze20%
Credit 2
Percentage of amenity space of lot size 25%
Csedit3
Percentageofamenityspace oflot3ize—>-30%
M1 -or
Required
2
3
4
5
Required
2
3
4
New% Fleet street standards, including; bikeway and pedestrian networks, and vehicle parking Required
Credit 1 Carr sirare parkiing, r,1ii,i,nul1x 2 parking spots 1
Credit2 Clsrrgiogf.,P Iityfor elecericcars 3
CFeA 3 Indoor bicycle storage and Changing facilities 1
Credit Priorltyparking for sub-compact{SmarrCars-and mororcyclesf T
❑ Poi ntsin4eategoriesrincludingatIeast one wMinGreenFar tor orAmen ity5pace Hytlt,u d
Packet Pg. 72
5.B.a
7.11 Purpose, Principles and Intent
Purpose
This Section identifies additional recommendations
for city staff, boards and commissions involved with
potential development within the Five Corners
Special District, and provides measures to encourage
development, enhance the Five Corners area, and to
foster interim uses of vacant properties.
Principles and Intent
Redevelopment of a multi -faceted and complex site,
such as Five Corners, does not happen quickly and,
often, cannot be the product of private development
acting alone. A core principle of the Five Corners plan
is that the city can and should be actively involved in
encouraging and supporting the type of development
desired. In meeting with the community, working with
the combined Economic Development Commission
(EDC), Planning Board (PB), and researching the issues
raised. the UW Green futures Lab Team identified a
number of recommendations that: we be]ieve will
assist the City in implementing the The ReVisioning
Five Corners; A Special District Form Based Code.
7.2 1 Attracting Young Adults
as Residents
During the 2011 Edmonds Special District Community
Workshops, there was a good disciission about the
need to attract young people to the Five Corners
Special District. In large part, the discussion focused
arou nd providing a substantial number of smaller
sized dwell! r)g u nits that might be attractive to the
needs and budget of young singles or couples without
children. The UW Green Futures Lab Team have also
researched and discussed a Hst of possible uses that
are attractive to this demographic, These include:
• thrift stores or consignment shops
activities such as flea markets, craft fairs, farmer's
markets
coffee shops with internet access
• new or used book stores
7.0 1 Recommendations
• bike supplles and fopair
rncvie theatres f cinema
• pizza places
- bars and pubs
• restaurants
• community center
• organic and fresh{local food shops and restau rants
public art
While the Five Corners plan cannot specify individual
uses for the area, city staff can work with developers to
identify the desirable +uses and provide administrative
assistance - such as expedited permitting - for projects
incorporating a healthy mix of smaller dwelling units
and act! vities of introrest to young people.
7.3 1 Interim Uses for Vacant Buildings
and Sites
In a few instances, there are vacant storefronts or offices
currently existing within the Special District. These
vacancies create a sense of dis-investment that detracts
from the desirability of the area for new development.
Additionally, they reduce the overall level of activity
and discourage users from coming to the area to shop
or dine. While specific uses and terms of the lease
are elements generally left to the property owner to
decide, the City might assist the owners by encouraging
new temporary uses or, possibly, relaxing city code
requirements for specific types of temporary uses.
These temporary uses might include:
• youth programs, after school day-care, teen centers
• drop in child care facilities for shoppers
• thrift stores or consignment shops - possibly church
operated
• used book exchange
• artist studios
incubator businesses
• community space for informal and `pop-up' activities
• interim art installations
• festivals and performances
- 53
Packet Pg. 73
5.B.a
7.4 1 City Investments to Foster Development
The City must recognize that redevelopment of the
nature and extent envisioned for Five Corners will
take many years to accomplish, especially in the
current economic climate. There are a number of
actions the City could take to encourage the desired
redevelopment. The Five Corners Plan is intended to
rely primarily on private investment, rather than on
public investment, however, public investment can
serve as a catalyst to encourage private investment.
Suggestions for Five Corners include:
Infrastructure and Open Space
• Provide a new roundabout at Five Corners to im-
prove traffic flow and enhance pedestrian safety.
• Provide enhanced landscaping of the roundabout
and adjacent public rights -of -way to increase the
attractiveness of the area, enhance stormwater
management and to signal the development
community that the city is interested in new
development activities at this location.
• Provide an outdoor activity space and/or park
- especially on the parcel located behind the
Jeremiah Center - for use as a farmer's market,
craft fair, civic events, etc.
• Improve the pedestrian connections between
the Five Corners Special District and surrounding
neighborhoods, connecting sidewalks and bike
trails to the surrau nding networks.
• Improve street rights of way to include th.e
landscaping, bike lanes, and bioswale5 (Sections
4.4 and 4.5). Often municipal Investment in an area
serves as a signal to developers that the City is
welcoming of new development In that area and
encourages &volnpers to get invdived.
• Improve street rights -of -way, Including the
landscaped areas alang the street edge, normally
required of the developer.These investments
lower the C*St'S fOr the private developer and
ensure that the City achieves a continuity of design
that may be difficult with individual developers -
Financing
• Apply for grants to fund some of the measu re
Abtive Under a Sustainable C*rnrnUr1itiS% prOgrarn
sponsorred by HUD, Washington State, the Puget
Si1L]nd Regional Council, Or 5 noi,orT1i%h Ci1LJrlty.
Marketing
Sponsor a public art program. In addition to
permanent pieces, there could be temporary!
interim art installations, perhaps with a combined
merchanticity tunding. Also, the city could sponsor
Image 7.1 - A Lobe lane ends and ramp alkml cKNst to uwsilion no-
si[Ir L>alll m10 a h11lp 14Q(-sg(6sr r„)akl SkLr-Orh to Vrely, wfxYebriarlelw
i nuns- Source. kehlke.inloldoaiments les and-roundLa ouvJ
a call for artists to fill art outdoor space, the center
of the new roundabout (when completed) or
utilize vacant spaces around Five Corners.
Roundabout Safety
Tile roundabout At Fi'1e Cc,ri>IerS Of eF rS a unique
opportunity to Improve traffic flow For motor vehicles,
as well as bicycles and pedestrians. However, some
modern roundabouts entail long crossing distances
far pedestri:tr,s and cyclists- Ir, areas with many ped-
estrians and cyclists such as Flve Corners, the diameter
df the roundabout should be a$ sr All 8s passible, t,rr
at the very least, the approaches should be narrowed
anal the entry angle int reasiAd to reduce Cr*SSing
distances and encourage drivers to slow down -
Below are specific recommendations for allowing
bicyclists td move safely through -
if vehicle speed is reduced to 15 Miles per hotLr, it
is safest for cyclists to take a lane and go through
the roundabout like a vehicle, which ke2pS them
out of motorlsts' blind spots,
Cy( lists that are not comfortable taking a lane, may
prefer to dismount and. become a pedestrian.
Some roundabouts
are designed for
cyclists to follow
alongside the �Y- --
pedestrian route, on
a marked shamow •
between the roadway �
ar+d the sidewalk
with a crossing +.•'*
perpendicular td each
approach marked
with sI riFs Or paint.
54
Packet Pg. 74
5.B.a
7.5.1 1 Movement Opportunities I Green Connections
By establishing green connections between destinations (such as schools and parks), the neighborhood becomes
inure walkable, aS well as pr*vides better curineraed habitat for uvi ldlafe. There is great opportunity to can nec I
existing parks, with new continuous green spaces providing significantly higher habitat value than isolated
spaces -These green improvements will provide the aesthetic features that will contribute to a more livable
residential environment surrounding live Corners (see Section 4).
Green connections and features can also help to re -du crsthe impacts of urbanization on the natural environrnent-
Currently rainwater runoff flows from Edmonds roads, roof&and parking lots directiy into the area's streams
and to Puget Sound, without 6rstfllteringthe petroleulnand metal sthat vehic€es generate. Streettree5, natural
areas and sustainab€e storrnwater infrastructure Wp tc slow and fi[ter this stormwater, to alleviate the pollution
buf den that city streets puts on local water bodies. Fi gure 7.1.1 shows some of the opportu nines to increase green
rennection s in the W S surrounding the Five Corners Special Di w io
Awpm r .+ yiU�L7h _ _ < < .G.i•7fFtlh #W4w hFs•IF.
� r
�{ 3
ACMU
f j�p7y� F ♦ �Ir9e rxef�rw
#LA+t1ikth 1
}2o7pIF �
f 2671h ;
Mali ' l�Jlh
s r a,2Wpl r
I mod, x nw, V -
!+ 7Mrh f} � t
I - 209[h S
hµK1w�IMJhra + f �+; �S 4
�` =•uln EL t 1L141 S 719rh
r
Lf " t
- +
i9Eh
f10Lh
2 LJ{ry
a }L71h
2 L67h
R
Legend
gmn con n+alons - Ipowntlal
� mov�rrr�gl runnPSlloers-piStF�j W�kilrl�
•— — — r0lus! 5 - 10 rlhlnutes
%PVHio•rr!}1°•Y'r. r,i ATpnimlMr.ri-!Fnrm?ti=rd4-Me
- 1011.
oc-
:�}fl
ilA1M1 rFApli1
rialh
r
r.�er
in HA me
Packet Pg. 75
5.B.a
7.5.2 1 Movement Opportunities I Sidewalks
By making good pedestrian connections to the Five Corr*rs Special Qiarict, pedestrian use of the pistrict may
Increase. This supports the plan's reduction In on -site parking requirements and enhanced amenity space, site
act ivitiw; and greed featQres. Figure 7,5.2 sbows sidewalk cmWitions in the vicinity of the Five Corners pistrir..t
and highlights areas where sidewalk improvements are needed,
flr + O.Wuhf —N[h
L� r ,1Lcest
� r a
]4F1Ll�
-
iyp{rtlY � I 75GinL ■ rw. lttl+. rY1L � �, ��� � `
f�u� ♦y6Gnl J
Amh t
r dr Myth 4%
F[f LYE C
Y I � � �OL - F
1 rf k
x 7{neh 7L
J511h ti
1
e +
1 l••grY •, .. 1. 1� i
I Pak 5
j A
a
115u1
}1i�1
7l7ek
. #L1Hr
#1�IIr
aL
{
Legend
F _,I oppor;unitylrnadkrbmierwblklncondltlons
IIra I R11 •,1 oFn
sidewalks
walkirig radius; S -10 minubm
'CdW 43 rlv • .q
!W fF Fxa .Lr.o-' 1y�k*o
.Sdrh
Dam �
J 1jUI
;kl.
Ydwr'. Iw.vLJ
N.M.
keel
a lw xn 1,oC9
Packet Pg. 76
5.B.a
7.5.31 Movement Opportunities I Cyr -ling
Making new bicycle connect iom will enable people to get to Five Corners Without getting in thelF Cars, and
create safe ways to cycle between schools, parks and residential areas. Figure 7.5,3 shows opportunitles to
improve hycycling roonerfions hfalvnaWl thip 1,ve Cvrner5 District and the surrounding neigh lawhoods-
c m s ti
As - 71x,h♦ �kiG�il Fries hn ":)8hth .
� ....rirr,+.
` t ' - 1x
I
]Ohh
j�}fi[h
;gTlh
�
ro-nn
,
5
i
,Xmh
-
4
J
f'
ii
Imh
k 5
'•
I
ti
20]gl Y
1
F� {7USh
n
I Milh
L
x
1
f
f
« rg
a'i i
1
1
c 7
Y
1
Sa•
I
1
I
�,��,'�
1
Y • wp .
� vpk
4 �,
$
1
P
{
Y i
4
4
x
JY+W1 iarvey. 5`vvJ�n�Wda
_
• 215LIF
14h J
1 K
f
1yU
IL
M71h
��
a
Wih
PAII
#
.E
11Trh
eL
}
`
ti �** 4
�71981
� �r�_pppYrLkti[�I##!�►
�Iws.'a�•
a
Legend
bike canne-rhoas - polern[[al
— — _ walking radius! S- 10minules
Ct� 14oe�a
45A� Pd.. ft k. H4ri.
]1 m
Y
0 7s0 �W IAW fk `ram'
?T
Packet Pg. 77
Edmonds Five Corners October 2017 // City of E5.B.b
Fact Sheet / "ReVisioning Five Corners: A Special District Form -Based Code"
Rey coning
FIVE CORNERS
CORE CONCEPTS
The intent for Five Corners is to create a vibrant mixed -use activity center that
enhances economic development, provides housing, and retail/office uses that
support the surrounding neighborhood. Core concepts include:
Emphasis on creating a lively pedestrian environment
with wide sidewalks and buildings placed close to the street.
A requirement for 15% landscaped open space. All units shall
meet a minimum Green Factor score of .30. Green Factor is a
score -based code requirement developed by the City of Seattle to
improve the quality of landscaping in new development.
Retain and infiltrate stormwater on private property through use
of low -impact development techniques.
Increase affordable housing and housing options. Require 10%
of new housing units to be made affordable to low- to moderate -
income households and require a mix in housing unit size —
ranging from 900- to 1,600-sf.
Provide options for active transportation by installing new bike
�♦i lanes and enlarging sidewalks.
EXISTING CONDITIONS
AGE OF
QUICK FACTS
0 STRUCTURE Approximately 12,000 people
a 1900's ! El1940's live within one mile of the
❑ !
1950's ! study area.
7r 1960's
! 1970s ! Median age of the population
-- 1980's ! is 46.6-years-old.
400
r 1990's !
�.� )
12T Homeownership rate is
P�7 about 72.7-percent.
u Z Average household income
p [1 �� � ❑ o is around $102,500 (2015
q ❑ �1 _ F1 dollars).
STUDY AREA: 9.6 sq. acres
EXISTING USES
SQUARE FOOTAGE
General Retail
36,694
Church
12,192
General Office
6,870
Multi -Family
I 3,780
Single -Family
I 3,670
TOTAL
63,206
CURRENT TENANTS
• Calvary Chapel Edmonds
• Cafe Ladro
• Casa Oaxaca
• A Brewed Awakening
• Bar Dojo
• Shooby Doo Catering
• Noodle Hut
• 5 Corners Teriyaki
• Frankie's Barber Shop
• Magic Nails
Source: 2011-2015 ACS 5-year sample,
census block level data
• City Dry Cleaners
• Namaste Salon
• Farmers Insurance
• State Farm Insurance
• My Sister's Place (art classes)
• Bridge Animal Referral Center
• Edmonds Veterinary Clinic
• Edmonds Foot & Ankle Clinic
• College Place Optical
E
0
m
a�
0
�a
m
L
L
0
U
m
m
r
R
LL
L
a�
F
0
U
L0
a�
c
0
a�
N
r
C
a�
E
R
Q
c
m
E
U
ca
r
Q
Packet Pg. 78
Edmonds Five Corners City of E 5.B.b
Commercial Block
Mixed -Use Courtyard Live -Work Loft Mixed -Use Rowhouse Side Court Stacked Dwelling
Required Building Line (Distance from Property Line)
Street 5' 5' 5' 5' 5' 5' 5'
Roundabout 20' min., 40' max. — — 20' min., 40' max. — 20' min., 40' max. 20' min., 40' max.
Miscellaneous
A minimum of 60% of the primary fagade shall be built to the Required Building Line.
All Properties 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Roundabout 3 — — 3 — 3 3
Miscellaneous
One bonus story is permittted for any property meeting the height bonus criteria (see section 6.5.3).
Frontage Types (See fig. 3.3-1)
Gallery, Shopfront, Forecourt, Stoop, Any Frontage Type Gallery, Shopfront, Stoop, Terrace Gallery, Shopfront, Any Frontage Type
Terrace Terrace Terrace Terrace
Miscellaneous
Any section of along the required building line that is not defined by a building must be defined by amenity or green space except for the minimum necessary opening for vehicular access.
Awnings, bay windows, or other building design features may encroach over the Required Building Line, but not the Property Line.
Loading docks or other service entries are prohibited on street facing facades.
Facades on retail frontages shall be glazed with clear glass no less than 70% of the sidewalk -level story.
Any building fa4ade facing a public street shall include changes in buiulding form, modulation, archways, entrances, porches, or stoops for every 12' of frontage.
Access through the building to rear parkign or amenity space is required at intervals no less than every 150' of the fa4ade facing the street.
Spaces
Residential: 1 space per unit
Other Uses: 1 space per 500 SF
w
Q
Packet Pg. 79
5.B.c
`0C. t Sy1
TO: MAYOR EARLING AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
FROM: JAMIE REECE, CHAIR, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
SUBJECT: RECOMMENDATIONS ON FIVE CORNERS PLANNING
DATE: FEBRUARY 15, 2017
The Edmonds Economic Development Commission has reviewed and discussed ideas regarding the current and
future state of planning and development within the Five Corners area. The completion of the roundabout, the UW
Green Futures Lab "ReVisioning" study and planning process, , and the current economic conditions suggest that
there is an opportunity to meet several needs of the greater Edmonds community. We believe the Five Corners area
serves as a "gateway" to the Bowl, and can provide a consistent and contiguous redevelopment opportunity from
Highway 99 through Downtown Edmonds. Our focus for Five Corners is to increase housing opportunities, including
affordable housing, within Edmonds, develop mixed -use buildings that are economically feasible for developers and
enhance the Five Corners community, and further increase the walkability along this vital main corridor into Edmonds.
As mentioned, we believe the roundabout is an excellent starting point, but believe further work is necessary. The
Revisioning Study that was conducted by the University of Washington highlights the community desires, but we
believe that there will be a need for high public input once the study is complete. Our recommendations, more
specifically:
• We encourage the Council to direct staff to conduct a detailed feasibility study for development
options within the Five Corners area. There are no current studies regarding the financial feasibility of
potential redevelopment scenarios within the Five Corners area. We strongly encourage Council to fund
such a detailed feasibility study that will be the basis for greater direction to the Council and Planning
departments on what conditions need to be in place to create an atmosphere that is welcoming to the
appropriate types of redevelopment further development of appropriate, such as zoning changes, and
identification and implementation of available redevelopment incentives. and provides
• We encourage the Council to move quickly on the study. During economic upturns, and during periods
of high growth, it is important to move quickly to adequately study and understand the potential marketplace
for redevelopment. As Edmonds continues to express concern regarding the lack of affordable housing, we
Packet Pg. 80
5.B.c
believe that a detailed study, incorporating a form -based code that includes a mandatory commercial
portion, will increase the likelihood that potential mixed -use development(s) will take place within the Five
Corners area.
• We encourage Council and staff to explore and develop incentives for desired development. We
understand that Washington limits certain incentives; however, local fees may be waived to attract
developers, County programs may exist for the development of affordable housing, and State or Federal
funds may be available for development of certain properties. Every incentive that the City of Edmonds can
offer to developers should be explored, as the Five Corners redevelopment inevitably will be a net gain to
our community.
• The Committee believes that the City's implementation of the Roundabout a catalyst project that will
help spur the redevelopment of the Five Corners Area ; however, certain code restrictions may be
hampering development. The Roundabout has created an attractive and smooth traffic flow in this key
area, and lends itself to future redevelopment. The feasibility study will outline specific concerns that are
preventing redevelopment in these areas. As Edmonds modernizes and enhances areas, it would be useful
to also implement acceptable code changes based on detailed studies and analysis. Although Five Corners
is not a high commercial corridor, the vision of mixed -use buildings that include sidewalk cafes, street -
forward building fronts, and residential components will greatly enhance Edmond's' ability to meet housing
demands, increase jobs within Edmonds, and create a more walkable and enticing environment in the Five
Corners area.
As with any economic development, we believe firmly that further study, public comment, and discussion are
necessary to allow for continued Edmonds growth in a smart and positive manner. By conducting a feasibility
study on the Five Corners area, Edmonds can continue the trend of smart development.
Packet Pg. 81
6.A
Planning Board Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 10/25/2017
Public Hearing on the Proposed 2018 - 2023 Capital Facilities Plan / Capital Improvement Plans
Staff Lead: Rob English, City Engineer
Department: Planning Division
Prepared By: Diane Cunningham
Background/History
See Narrative below.
Staff Recommendation
Recommend approval to City Council.
Narrative
The City's Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) Element is a document updated annually and identifies capital
projects for at least the next six years which support the City's Comprehensive Plan. The CFP contains a
list of projects that need to be expanded or will be new capital facilities in order to accommodate the
City's projected population growth in accordance with the Growth Management Act. Thus, capital
projects that preserve existing capital facilities are not included in the CFP. These preservation projects
are identified within the six -year capital improvement program (CIP) along with capital facility plan
projects that encompass the projected expenditure needs for all city capital related projects.
CIP vs. CFP
The CFP and CIP are not the same thing; they arise from different purposes and are in response to
different needs. While the CIP is a budgeting tool that includes capital and maintenance projects, tying
those projects to the various City funds and revenues, the CFP is intended to identify longer term capital
needs (not maintenance) and be tied to City level of service standards. The CFP is also required to be
consistent with the other elements (transportation, parks, etc.) of the Comprehensive Plan, and there
are restrictions as to how often a CFP can be amended. There are no such restrictions tied to the CIP.
The proposed 2018-2023 CFP is attached as Exhibit 1. The CFP has three project sections comprised of
General, Transportation and Stormwater. The proposed 2018-2023 CIP is attached as Exhibit 2. The CIP
has two sections related to general and parks projects and each project list is organized by the City's
financial fund numbers.
Following the Planning Board's public hearing and recommendation the City Council will also hold a
public hearing prior to final approval.
Attachments:
ATT. 1: CFP - Complete 10.20.17
ATT. 2: CIP - Complete 10.20.17
Packet Pg. 82
6.A
ATT. 3: CIP-CFP Comparison (2018-2023) - 10.6.17
ATT. 4: PB Change Summary 102017
Packet Pg. 83
6.A.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2018-2023
op .. EDP
�sr
1!0
Eo
DRAFT
Q
Packet Pg. 84
6.A.a
Q
Packet Pg. 85
6.A.a
CFP
GENERAL
Q
Packet Pg. 86
6.A.a
Q
Packet Pg. 87
6.A.a
U
N
O
LL d
U �
w c
m A o
o a
01 N
E w W o
m y N
w«, ar
N
yT LL N "
U d
.+ c
'a N
c7 �
U v
A
a
N
N
N
0
0
a
CD
N
O
N
CL
N
N
O E
_
W/.��
/
46
N
N
O V
\
a
N
N
N
p
O O O O O
0 0 0 0 0
O^ LL
O
O y Ny I.O'1 O O
M
n
N
c
�
O
O O
O O O
O O
O
16U
N
w w
N
O
N
9oc
a
9co
00
TO
0
mdom
0
> o
r>
>yua Co
-~`
Com
N
O~
10 °
O
°
UO
U
o
t
9
W UU
w
mU
c
a
LL
a O
0.
O
p a
o
O O O O O
O O
N U
o 0 0 0 0
0 0 O yOj
O ow
O O O
O c C
N O O N
O
p
Op N
00 N 00 n
w
w fA N
V w w Q
OJ
fA
N
o
e
fM �
N � M
_
O
c
c u d
d
rn
d d
a
d
rn
2
°
d
n
d
° t
d
m E
d E
- E
�
Uaa
V
a v
0
a o
v
U
fC
U
a =
°c
OU
c
a
K
c
m C
`0
c
�
c
o
o
w
a
ti
U d
o
I
a
C
3
d
d
rn
a
m
w
T
d
E
Q 0
3
a"
1° d
m
4
me
m
r
O
N >.
6
❑ l6
«
Co
N 9 Vl
y0
O y
O
a
o?
f0
9
W e
v
a c
o cdi
c
n m
T
mod=
a
�,
dam
aD
z10
3m
>a
om>.
€
of
>"
m vo
cm
d a
o
m2
KU
O1mx
N LL N
0?
G E N
U Ol
3
«
C
d
0E�
U
ma
d
mUo;
oL
'm
V
O
N
�UQ
N m
m'w
5 m c�
N-
Kn
N U N
K mU
d N
T
�
T
9
°
m
E
LL
�
T
2i
_
J
U
N
d
a
�
o.
O
a5
O
v
'C O
T
E
N
E
° a
U _
�
m
N
2i
°
a
F
«
R
2
«
V °O
C
p
d
O
E
L U
.dc.
m
E
Q
a`
o
Q t
rn
0
..
>
d
N =
F
v
9
m
0
Of
O
c
IL
C
'� 90
LL
y
U
x
@
=
E
p
y c.
o
y
V
2S
UO
am0:2'
3ci
W
Q
Packet Pg. 88
6.A.a
Q
Packet Pg. 89
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN DESCRIPTION
6.A.a
PROJECT NAME: Aquatic Facility ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $5,000,000 —
$23,000,000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Implement recommendations of the Aquatics Feasibility Study
completed in 2009. Six scenarios were presented and the plan recommended by the
consultants was a year round indoor pool with an outdoor recreational opportunity in the
summer. The project is dependent upon a public vote.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: The current Yost Pool, built in 1972, is nearing the end of
its life expectancy. The comprehensive study done in 2009 assessed the needs and wants of
Edmonds citizens in regard to its aquatic future as well as the mechanical condition of the
current pool.
SCHEDULE: 2024-2038
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024-2038
Planning/Study
Eng. & Admin.
Construction
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$5m - $23m
0
N
0
a�
r
a
E
0
U
d
LL
U
a
r
c
E
* all or part of this Project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts Q
7
Packet Pg. 90
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Civic Center Development ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $12,050,000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Civic Center Development / Stadium Demolition.
Develop the recently adopted master plan for Civic Park, including demolition of the stadium.
Develop plan adding amenities and recreation components, restrooms to accommodate
increased growth.
PROJECT BENEFITI RATIONALE: Civic Center Development.
The acquisition and development of Civic Center is a high priority in the PROS plan.
SCHEDULE: 2018 - 2023
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Design
500000
1,000,000
Construction
250000
10,000,000
TOTAL
750000
11,000,000
a
Packet Pg. 91
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Community Park / Athletic ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $6-8 M
Complex at the Former Woodway High School
ra CIA HOGAN
- --------- -
... - _ --
f I
rC)R lER wOODWAY HIGH SCHOOL
ATHLETIC FIELD IMPROVEMENTS
PRE PAnto fOX THE E DMON DS SCHOOL DISH ICT
MAY FOV
6.A.a
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Develop community park and regional athletic complex with lighted
or unlighted fields and recreational amenities in partnership with Edmonds School District,
community colleges, user groups, and other organizations. Development dependent upon
successful regional capital campaign. $10m - $12M project for all 3 phases.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: The site is currently an underutilized and under maintained
facility with great potential as community multi -use active park. Site has existing controlled
access, greenbelt, parking and 4-court tennis facility with substandard fields. Highly urbanized
area with 150,000 residents within 5-mile radius. Future maintenance supported by user fees.
Phase 1 was completed in 2015 for $4.2M, Phases 2 & 3 will be completed in the future for an
additional $6-8M.
SCHEDULE: 2018-2038
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024-
COST
2038
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
Construction
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$6-8M
" all or a portion of this project may quality for 1 % for the Arts
9
0
N
O
a�
a
a
E
0
U
a
LL
U
Q
r
c
E
a
Packet Pg. 92
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN DESCRIPTION
6.A.a
PROJECT NAME: Parks & Facilities ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $3-$4 Million
Maintenance & Operations Building
Existing Building Outline
Yard Fu Mo
4
0
0
L adirtg T..�
New One S,
1,600 sf MOO Sf
Building
Driveway — 15,800�
Yard Functions � 11,910 If
Perimeter zone — 4,200 st
Existing Fence Line
4
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The 40 year old maintenance building in City Park is reaching the
end of its useful life and is in need of major renovation or replacement.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Parks and Facilities Divisions have long outgrown this
existing facility and need additional work areas and fixed equipment in order to maintain City
parks and Capital facilities for the long term.
SCHEDULE: Contingent on finding additional sources of revenue from general and real
estate taxes.
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024-2038
Planning/Study
Eng. & Admin.
Construction
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$3m
a
* all or part of this Project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts
10
Packet Pg. 93
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN DESCRIPTION
6.A.a
PROJECT NAME: Waterfront Redevelopment ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $3,595,000
/ Waterfront Walkway Completion
_____________ Dar
Prapvwd Rmw4
W arerlront Ganrer
j
;I
;rrra5:
r �Mw ww
r
- .. K+rkrw rarer.
- � raecnrwrtdnn
� rrnrprre�
B.a Ova j � 1 FW"M"bRa•.-
r reaaeanw.. jw. r
9-drrti +M ply. q
O �-
zsz
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Work with Sr. Center to renovate surrounding park, parking lot
and walkway. Remove creosote pier, reintroduce habitat for fish and wildlife. Increase access
to the waterfront to accommodate increased growth. Connect waterfront walkway from
Brackett's Landing South to Olympic Beach, including completion in front of the Ebb tide
condominiums.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Provide anew Senior and Community Center and
provide a new beachfront walkway. One of the top priorities in the PROS plan is to open up
beach -front access.
SCHEDULE: 2018-2023
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Planning/Study
Eng. & Admin.
Construction
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$2,425,000
$1,170,000
0
0
0
0
* all or part of this Project may qualify for 1% for the Arts
a
11
Packet Pg. 94
6.A.a
Q
12
Packet Pg. 95
6.A.a
CFP
TRANSPORTATION
Q
13
Packet Pg. 96
6.A.a
Q
14
Packet Pg. 97
6.A.a
LL N
U
N
V R O
0 0 O N
y C O
v N p N
W = 10
0
r N O N
_ LL O. N
V r � N
i Cp
R
V N
a
's o 0 0
O N N yy O
O W m A N N CD
w w » w Q
L
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o Q-
o N N o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
o r n N ro io r o0
a w w vi -
i»
0 0 o uoi uoi o 0 o Q-
0 0 0 o V N O o o
w =
a
m
U-
o
o n
o o
o 0
Q
r
0
N N
N N N
aa
V O
N
U
M
N
O
N
U
U
U
U
U00
to LL O
In LL O
to LL O
In LL O
to LL CI
N
(n @ f
`o
to N f
@
U)
'o
o o
g~
`o
N m F
o lo
4%
_o
m
m"
o
o
o
o
o
o
O
LL
LL
m
LL
d
LL
m
LL, LL
d
LL
m
LL, LL
Q.
"
p
a
o
0 y
O c o0
o o io
uaoai N o
0 0
V O
0
O O O
o n
O
0 0
�
w
_
o
m
m
m
m
L
o
O
m
U
U
U
o
a'
ao
ao
a°
ao
O
2� o
y a
N
O
T
d
o
L
o 3 a
d
c
—
OD
y p
"O0
a
_
j m
m
o c
m N O
di
T
d a
mOOi
TNR]C
m o a m
O >..
E 3> oo
@ o E-
o `3 o
aEi
o 2
d
d o
`, m
o a m 'm
0 9 ml;
m m � o
oid E >
E rn
=
y E -o
E
m N
d m
Z m
m
c m 0 2
@ _H
o E
V
E
m
L
o c d
E
` c o o
o>�°>'e
m 2 d>
=r
>mo:;
H = 6
o�
;
a
�oN
Eo
�o
cE
E cEc
SOZ-E
_Finn
Uw0
a
33
V
m
o
a
No
a
H
T
U,
>
11) H
d
H
c
yd
U
d
=d
3
U
Q
aEi
N O
m
O
Q
N O
L
}I
aUE
m
N
L E
a
Ua E
4)
3
N
EaUE
;o
s
L o
n 5
OI
2
o
y5
C
L o
`n~o5
T 6
2 E
lC
r+
Q
15
Packet Pg. 98
6.A.a
U. N
U
d
c m o
O d 0 N
y C O
v N p N
W=;0Co
0o
, N O N
IL O
Y L
U
M
o O
O
yo
�
N
O
w y
iIl N
�
li
N
�
M
O O
O O
O
p
N
M M
N N
O
N
'
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0
0 0
L
Q
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 o
0 0
0 0
0 o
in y
o 0 0
0 y0
0 0
0 _
N
w
w N
fA
0 0 o
O O O
�
O O O
O O O
fA
CL
O O O
O O O
O O O
O O O
O O
y y O
O O
O O
O O O
O O O
O O O
N N
O O O
N
o
O O
N I� O
M N
O O O
N 0M
O O
N
O O O
O
N
V
y N tp
th y
y N A
01
m o
y O
O
(A y
y
y
1� A
M I�
r N O
N
a
N
ui
N
01
O
N
LL
_
Q.
O
O
N
U
M
N
O
N
00
3
=
d '
d '
d = s
d = -
_
m @ IL aR
in
_
� '�" IL
`�
_
5
3
5
2
_
D IL .�
w
W `O" IL r
5
u) B
`3
5
U
c
O
y m F
° oo
(n O
m m F
°
m o
m m F
° o
y o
m m F
° °
m 0
rn m F
°
(n °
m m F
° °
y 0
(n m F
° °
(n °
m F
y go
°
m 0
Z5
° o
c
Jo
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
LL
IOi
IL N
IL N
IL N
LL N
IL N
IL N
IL N
li N
Q.
`N
LL
LL
LL
LL
LL
LL
LL
O
O O O
O O
O O O
IL
Gi
M
N
O p
O O O
O O
O
O O
O O
O O O
O O
O O O
N C1
r
O
O C) O y
fA N M
M N M
O
O N O y
w O) ty
N N
� w N
O
O I� O
w y M O
O O M
m� Mw
N y 0
O r
w tC �j O
M y
� w N
O O O
O O
fA Ol V
r OI
� w N
O O
O O
to N fA y
O> Oi
� W
O H O pp
to I� M
M N M
O O O O
to to to w
O O O O
to to to M
O
�
m
L
Co
Co
—
@
N
N
L
d
O
yN�
O
O
O
o
y@�
o
O
pN�
o
O
T
i
a`
—
2
19
15
2
T
2
a'
0
�r
C7 p
-
-
2
-
_
p
mo
m
a°
a
a°
mui
m
m
J
N
O
T
g °
m` o
°
K
d
c c
x
D L
t
pN
p C
m m
2 C N
a H
V
N N N
me o.
3
O
m N
N>
d 3
O
n£@
E m o
d£
3
O
FL
c c
m
'o a E
m t
10 io
r N
o°
°,amd
'w o'�
odrn
v£
mgm
°
J
m mE°Hm
_gc
m
ESN
V
CL
a
o
4
C
00
>.
3 3"
N° o
c
n Z`
m
o T c
- 0. N o
O
N y
r £
lA N w
t a�
N
n=
m N 2
o
C 6.H
� o
C
m a°i p m
.m
N c E
3 E w U
0
m
r `m
a E o
d d E
w o -cco
m m d
o
o° H
,
mma
aain�rn
E
9n£
d>°O
o
cv rnU
�U`-'N
`S aim
�d°�o
3
m m d d
c Ud >$
m
a
c E
W E a E
U U
c> d'
— o
c 9 nip
V
0
o
o
L
y
H
g
g
N
C
N
Z
11)
u)
m
c
Q
n E
Q
d
in
t
>
E
>
>'.
a
N
a
N C
N C
L
N
o
= N
t
E
N—
L
W O
L
w
N y
o
N£
C
AW,
�E
(a) E'
aU
m£
aU°
aUE
aUE
>°
oo'm'o
S o
rn
'"�
d
N
�o
m'o
uy
Q�
i
U
3 �
3
W
Q
16
Packet Pg. 99
6.A.a
LL r
U
N
r R O
O d d N
y C O
v N O N
W _ Co
O 'o O
T N O N
LL 2
Y L
U
p
N
N
O
N
N
V V
-
iD
�
O O
O O
N 10f1
� W
a
N
e»
O O
� �
N
N
N
N
O
N
N
O
N
N
N
Of
O
N
O
N
3
o 'Z
IL �
N�
a
�
c
c
LL
m F
° ° °
LL N
.� iy
tp tp
a v
m F
m °
N
.LL. IL
ul m F
m ° o
N
•LL-• IL
M
N �
N U
�
°ti3 O OM C
. °tA . W
°tA . °tA .
N
U
U
N
l0
L
IL
;
d
'O
IL`
@
U
N
U
U
0
c7 0
O
a
mm�
=
m
`
W
o a�Oi°md
U y Q n a
m
_
o
£ d
O
CL
m
�90,30
am£
-'o rn
m
e
H a
C O o N
.. m
,s
R
N N& C
a L
J
o m
E Q d
O
m
°r
2 'E
9y
c o
d
N
N
m
C o
$ C
Z
at5i
O
o m
t
£
£ `9
3
WE
O E
O O
O O
�O N
O O
� IA
O O
N N
� N
O O O
O O �
N
� � N
�
N
F
o p 0
N
LL LL
F
p 00
N
LL LL
@ F
p o
N
LL LL
0 o
rW
c o
O
uo Lq o
-
m
d
U
o
°
U
m
o
C7
m
a
m
(�
d
0
a
o
0
o m N
o d
ob
'm' o
H
m O
�4
H �rn 4 Z'
m o
c d$
m d c m
o.u)
tD W
ono
oL��
oL�,o
Ems
N N
£M n,o
N
E-,. o
N 2
O
fV)
m
6
3
>
z
c�
=3
s
0
° o
w2
2 6
E
E W
o m
�¢
E 1
o m
`g
�
mo
u o
N o
u
S. E
N n
N
N W
Q
17
Packet Pg. 1 0771
6.A.a
LL N
U
N
V R O
O d ILN
y C O
v N p N
W = Co
oaro
T N O N
LL O
Y L
U
MID
N
N
O
_
N
�
CD
M
O O
O O
O O
N N
E
N
O
Q� OI
A W
O O
N
'
y'
0 o
O
L
Q
0
N
N
0 0
N N
0 0
O O
N
O O O
CL
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O O
N
O O
O M
O O
M N N
U
IL
N
N
N
Oa
O
N
U-
CL
N n W
O
N
M M
�
M
N
O
N
d
d
d
d
00
3
O
w
c
C
C
C
C
C
c
0
N
m LL O
N
LL O
N
LL O
N
LL O
N
LL O
N
N
C
W
fn 10 F
O o
(D
(n N F
p o
t4
U) <0 F
@ `0 'op
(D
fn N F
o
MS
(n <6 F
@ `0 go`O
(n @ F
o
A
N o
W
C
LLvO�
Co
76
li LL
LL N
IL N
IL N
IL N
ILL N
IL N
yi
LL
LL
LL
LL
LL
LL
p
o 0
0 o
aL
Gi
M
No O
o 0
O
0 0
0 0
n
N U
O O O O
O Oi O N
O O O O
O N O N
O O O O
O O O O
N
cb
M O fA O
to M to M
fA fA O O
43 O (A O
to G to C
M O N
to O r
C
N H
tm
�
m
L
U
C1
U
o
U
U
T
i
.O
U
U
U
U
U
U
�j
U
a`
—
c �
m
m
m
m
m
a
-
-
-
T
�
N
0
o
OI
o N
C 0 0
O T UOJ
o
N
N O c
N O
o
Gi
d
Z` 1
m' 1
m y
-- x
w o 0
of
o
3
o t/1
cc
mm
m
r
y+
CN
ma=
x
x
cd
�
cac
Q.
N
0
N C t6
C=
Ti
3_W Q
N
O E c
O E .H
E
E
7
O.
N
y o�
r
mZi
mg
m
a9i�
a
d y
H O
d O
o
.O N
a N
>�I
�_�
oQo
�m
a =Q
���
allo
a
m N
£ m w
N
a E
o:y=
a£ n
o
a
o�
a N Q>
o�v
a N m
LL
U
0
mo
o
=
in
y
m
�
o
o
Z
m
E
n
¢
3
C1
p
N
o
N
o
m
E
o
`E
0
3
alai
�y
0
��
�>
d
N
(n
41
> f/1
U)
T
N
>
41
f/1 >
(n
Q
(/1 U
(n
S
V M
O
N
�
N>
(O 1�
M
�•i
W N
b
M N
N
yt«
N M
fn
N S
N
Q
18
Packet Pg. 1 1771
6.A.a
LL N
U
N
V R O
O d d N
(0 C O
v N O N
W = '-;� CO
O '0 � O
T N O N
LL 2
Y L
U
M
N
N
N
O O
O O
O O
O O
16 N
m O
O O
O O
ro aD
� W
0 0
0 0
O O
O O
N� NM
Om
O
N N
�
(n
M
N
O
N
N
_ _
M
O O O
O O
�
N
O O
O O
M C09
O O O
O O O
E N O
N
N
Of
O
N
O
N
�
IS
IL
m U) O
c
U)
rn m
(n m
° p 0
m m
° p 0
(n m
° p o
(n m
° p o
LL
m-
O N v
LL LL
N N
IL LL
O N
LL IL
N N
IL LL
N N
LL LL
M N
N C1
O O O O
O O
i° 0 0
O O O O
O O O O
N � � N
� V o
aO
N
U
o
❑
N
l0
L
IL
d
ILCL
75
o
75
yy��
U
0
@
0
c �
m
is
p
a°
E
w N
@
❑
rn
E
m r
N
d
N Q
mt
N
c L w
oL
N
_
d
•-
H
o
m
m
C
oa)
oai
75N3
3rna
cm
-3
Ow.
?y
om
3
a'
Q
d
N2�
`°
x r E
6
r�
m
yt«
dxg
H
.mQ
Ev
a3iN�
d
E
o
m"
m o_^
N M
d E
Z
w u
= c°
Do
L
£ w
>
E O
23
Q
t
o
a` dim
U n
N
Q
m
(L(L
U£
O
n
N
N
O
U)
A
o
d
n
w
E
Z
L
o
¢
9
M
L
N
O
G)
o
a
o
IL
❑�
E
w
N
E
o
a
x
3
N M
o
d
N
E
w V)
m o
N
5
Cl
r n
m U)
c
0 0
O O
O
O O O
O O O
19
o O
O O
fA
_ _
O O O
O N O
M N o
O O o
O O y Oy
r N N
O O o
O O O
L6 o V
U
m LL O
fn 'S " O
U
to u) LL O
U
m� LL O
to N f
0 0 0
d
ILL li
(n @ f
`o 0 0
d
LL LL
m N f
0 0 0
d
LL Io
m N f
`o 0 0
d
LL Io
O O O
O O O
OW . .
W
o
U
O
U
U
o
U
U
o
U
m
0
m
a°
m
0
m
o
io
0
m
a°
o,
p
E Qo
m
o
o
L
n
c
c
c o
t m"
3 m £
y
L
c t
o E
a�
d a@
n m
y E
m
o
0°i
DNE
N
8 9
a N
N 9
'NOoN 8
d£
a
o d
N>
>O
E
0
z°
3 0
Q
�
°
a
o
inn
nmL
=
dEo
d
aU
K o
w
° n
0 0 0
ID O O O
_ H
O1 M
U
to LL O (n LL O m LL
m 5 F m N H n rt
m°° m O° m° c
d d d
LL IL ILL IL IL LL
O O O O O O O O O O C
to to fA N fA Vi (A IA to fA ff.
N - -
U L
0 o C
U U U
O o W N
O O N C O
yU)E
d Lc
._ .U)m dU)
o E oL'� oL
o ry E o 0
m E`-
d a _o o o
g ai c6 o
_ _
°¢¢ :2. a33
O V t0� o NN o N�
(L c a` a' in a-L
> fn m
U
°)
o Q t r
L °o m
0 N
�o _0 0
Q in > m > m
Q t Q r
�8 �s
a
19
Packet Pg. 1 2
6.A.a
LL N
U
d
V R O
O d d N
y C O
v N p N
W = 00
0
r N O N
_ LL 2 N
N
(Z � CO
R
V N
o
c
e
�
�
r
w
a
d
E
d
0
L
Q
E
Q
U
c
IL
m
ea
U-
Q
m
v
M
N
O
N
U
U
OD
N
U
� m F
o
U) m F
d
d
0
LL LL
LL LL
0
a
d
to to to W
to V3 6A t9
=
0
tm
_
-
m
m
L
0
0
a.
ti
T
0
N
O
tp
n
T
Hm
d
d
o 3
m
'o
QC.
o E
E
x
o £
G
m°
m°
��
0
ci
aN
aN
a�3
aN3
m
d
o �o aip
ate¢'
d
a`Na'
LL
V
3
3
Q
x
x
E
E
a+
0
0
=
d
E
N Q
N Q
Q
20
Packet Pg. 1 3
u
r 0
0 FL
v 21a
WCo
0o
»LL
Q-§
u
\
\ (
)
\ (
/
)/§
\ )0
LL
§j
aaa&
&a&a
0IL
\
\
k0
0
|
)\
))
>
9\«
(L
\\\
f6
|
/
/
}
r-
CS!
0
�
�
E
0
U
a
b
�
«
§
E
/
2
■
Packet Pg.�4
6.A.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: 228t" St. SW from Hwy. 99 ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $10,421,000
to 95t" PI. W
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Widen 228t" St. SW from Hwy. 99 to 95t" Pl. W to three lanes
(with two-way left turn lane), with curb and gutter, sidewalk, and bike lanes.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This project would improve pedestrian safety and traffic
flow along this corridor.
SCHEDULE: The design phase is scheduled to begin in 2022 (pending funding).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024-2038
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$75,000
$300,000
Construction
$10,046,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$75,000
$300,000
$10,046,000
a
22
Packet Pg. 105
6.A.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: 761h Ave W @ 21211 St. SW ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $6,500,000
Intersection Improvements
1
i
i
0
tUMUNUb-VVUUUVVHY
HIGH SCHOOL
man
W
a
R
Fi
L`
7301
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Add a northbound and southbound left -turn lane to convert the signal
operation for those approaches from split phasing to protected -permissive phasing. Add a right -turn
lane for the westbound, southbound, and northbound movements. The project also consists of
various utility upgrades and conversion of overhead utilities to underground.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Reduce the intersection delay and improve the existing level
of service to LOS C.
SCHEDULE: Design was completed in May 2016. The project was advertised in June 2016 but the
lowest bid was rejected since it was - approx. $1.3 Million over budget. The project was re -advertised in
February 2017 (under budget) and construction began in May 2017. The project is scheduled to be
completed in December 2017. A TIB grant was secured to cover the shortfall.
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration &
ROW
Construction
$353,740
1 % for Art
TOTAL $353,740
r
0
N
0
m
a
a
E
0
U
a
U_
U
t—
Q
c
m
E
M
a
23
Packet Pg. 106
6.A.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Highway 99 ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $190,000,000
Gateway/Revitalization
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The project would include, among other features, wider replacement
sidewalks or new sidewalk where none exist today, new street lighting, center medians for access
control and turning movements, etc., attractive and safe crosswalks, better stormwater
management, targeted utility replacements, potential undergrounding of overhead utilities,
landscaping and other softscape treatments to identify the area as being in Edmonds.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve aesthetics, safety, user experience, and access
management along this corridor. In addition, economic development would be improved.
SCHEDULE: The design phase is scheduled to begin in September 2017 and should be
completed between 2024 and 2038 (pending addition funding / $10M from Connecting
Washington allocation has been secured).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024-2038
COST
Planning/Study
Engineering &
$440,000
$436,000
$5,000,000
$4,300,000
$10,000,000
Administration
& ROW
Construction
$170,000,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$440,000
$436,000
$5,000,000
$4,300,000
$10,000,000
$170,000,000
a
24
Packet Pg. 107
6.A.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: SR-524 (19611 St. SW)/ 88' ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $903,000
Ave. W Intersection Improvements
SEVEN DAY
ADVENl1ST
CHURCH 4
196TH Sf SW
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install traffic signal at the intersection of 196th St. SW @ 88th Ave. W.
The modeling in the 2009 Transportation Plan indicated that restricting northbound and
southbound traffic to right -turn -only (prohibiting left -turn and through movements) would also
address the deficiency identified at this location through 2025. This is same alternative as one
concluded by consultant in 2007 study but not recommended by City Council. This could be
implemented as an alternate solution, or as an interim solution until traffic signal warrants are
met. The ex. LOS is F (below City Standards: LOS D). This project was ranked #6 in the
Roadway Project Priority in the 2015 Transportation Plan.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve traffic flow characteristics and safety at the
intersection. The improvement would modify LOS to A, but increase the delay along 196th St. SW.
SCHEDULE: The intersection LOS must meet MUTCD traffic signal warrants and be approved
by WSDOT since 196th St. SW is a State Route (SR524). No funding is currently allocated to this
project (pending grant funding).
COST
BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Planning/Study
Engineering &
$193,000
$175,000
Administration &
ROW
Construction
$535,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$193,000
$175,000
$535,000
a
25
Packet Pg. 108
CITY OF EDMONDS
6.A.a
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Main St and 9t" Ave. S ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $896,000
-11 Rk- �L_
BELL ST
M _
a
x
MAIN ST
J J _ L
WADEJAMES
`J THEATER
7111 W � �
a
x
H
DAYTON ST
�Z
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Installation of a traffic signal (or mini -roundabout is an alternative
solution).
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: The existing intersection is stop -controlled for all
approaches and the projected intersection LOS in 2035 is LOS F (below the City's
concurrency standards: LOS D). The installation of a traffic signal would improve the
intersection delay to LOS B. The project ranked #4 in the Roadway Project Priority of the 2015
Transportation Plan.
SCHEDULE: All phases are scheduled between 2018 and 2021 (unsecured funding)
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$120,000
Construction
$776,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$120,000
$776,000
a
26
Packet Pg. 109
6.A.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: 220th St SW @ 76th Ave W T$',925,000
TIMATED PROJECT COST:
Intersection Improvements
2,9rH sr sw
J
21919
J
J J
3 414
I' Lri
,a
Ui
in
J _J
1 2215TPLSW
TOP FOODS JSTARBU KS
J
220TH ST SW —
1
r
LYNWOOD
HONDA
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Reconfigure eastbound lanes to a left turn lane and through / right
turn lane. Change eastbound and westbound phases to provide protected -permitted phase for
eastbound and westbound left turns. Provide right turn overlap for westbound movement during
southbound left turn phase. (ROADWAY ROJECT PRIORITY #1 in 2015 Transportation Plan).
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Reduce the intersection delay and improve the LOS. The
projected LOS in 2035 would be improved from LOS F to LOS D.
SCHEDULE: Engineering, ROW, and construction scheduled between 2021 and 2023
(unsecured funding).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Planning/Study
Engineering & ROW
$330,000
$1,800,000
Administration
Construction
$3,795,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$330,000
$1,800,000
$3,795,000
' All or a portion of this project may quality for 1 % for the arts
27
Packet Pg. 110
6.A.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Hwy. 99 @ 212th St. SW ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $2,806,000
intersection improvements
i J
21 g sw I
i
w
W Pa Nung
s gn
shop
/
n
7373
P.U.B
3 Edmonds
Edmonds
/
W Family Clinic ei
Public 17-ks
ADX
KENNEL
21 1
27114 /
f Arbor
Q
2I /
P.
27109
R
n
lle Box /
/
212TH ST SW
7,.5�• CUPIC
a
LZF
"3'2"
PARK & RIDE
215TH
W
ST SW
U
o:
W
0
a
PLANT
AEGIS
W mMSWEDISH
DNnS CRM Pl15 '
ALLIED /
ROOFING /
/
/
B&M /
CON ST
21414 /
21448 /
/
/
NCnONRLD'
/ 01
1ALUE /
PILLAGE /
16TH ST/SW
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Widen 21211 St. SW to add a westbound left turn lane for 200'
storage length and an eastbound left turn lane for 300' storage length. Provide protected left
turn phase for eastbound and westbound movements. (ROADWAY PROJECT PRIORITY in
2015 Transportation Plan: #4)
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve intersection efficiency and reduce delay.
SCHEDULE: All phases are scheduled between 2021 and 2023 (unsecured funding).The
project cost is split between Lynnwood and Edmonds since half the project is within Lynnwood.
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Planning/Study
Engineering,
ROW, &
Administration
$175,000
$1,091,000
Construction
$1,540,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$175,000
$1,091,000
$1,540,000
0
N
O
a�
r
a�
a
E
0
U
a
LL
U
Q
c
a�
E
a
28
Packet Pg. 111
6.A.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Hwy. 99 @ 216th St. SW ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $2,335,000
intersection improvements
c^
2141021
13�408w
214021d12 {
21405
N
04
LU
U
2> 120L<
2i431MC�UHA6'
un
nz
150
r
2150021558EGIS
VALUE
VILLAGE
ST
qw
�/ �
• 216TH
21600 {� 21619
KRUGER
CLINIC f
"'01 r
21632 � � -
��I16e
2
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Widen 216th St. SW to add a westbound left turn lane for and an
eastbound left turn lane. Provide protected -permissive left turn phases for eastbound and
westbound movements. This project ranked #3 in the Roadway Project Priority in the 2015
Transportation Plan.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve intersection efficiency and reduce delay.
SCHEDULE: All phases are scheduled between 2021 and 2023 (unsecured funding).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Planning/Study
Engineering &
ROW &
Administration
$164,000
$334,000
Construction
$1,837,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$164,000
$334,000
$1,837,000
a
29
Packet Pg. 112
6.A.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Hwy. 99 @ 220th St. SW ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $3,215,000
intersection improvements
19TH sT SW
21919
f,ill
7514221 STPLSW
I
I
I
13
-- a
n
I
[:Z/II
TOP FOODS
220TH Sr SW
LYNWOOD
HONDA a
_ iL
FUN TA 91A
H'S IN N
L7
w .F 7223'J'
A.dy's
� td .D. 7391 R
A
a S
H ¢ nm
rsw
TIN
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Widen 220th St. SW to add Westbound right turn lane for 325'
storage length. Widen SR-99 to add 2nd Southbound left turn lane for 275' storage length.
(ROADWAY PROJECT PRIORITY in 2015 Transportation Plan: #1).
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Reduce intersection delay and improve traffic flow and
safety.
SCHEDULE: All Phases are scheduled between 2021 and 2023 (unsecured funding for all
phases).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
COST
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
& ROW
$175,000
$1,085,000
Construction
$1,955,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$175,000
$1,085,000
$1,955,000
a
30
Packet Pg. 113
6.A.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Hwy. 99 @ 234th St. SW ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $3,300,000
intersection improvements
ESPEMNCE
FS -
21207
S7ND PL W
�• �I� 2f731 .- F
'1 �233RD PL
'71J7tl' i _ e :331•. !9„ ]y0! 7131 -
Y"i �
2]40 o DIM 111 , 1717
ri 411 .,.
7yn7] -]y{f p uW
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install traffic signal at the intersection of Hwy. 99 @ 234th St.
SW to provide safer crossing of Hwy. 99 for vehicles and non -motorized transportation
(project identified in Hwy. 99 Sub Area Plan).
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve intersection safety and pedestrian conditions
along the corridor.
SCHEDULE: All Phases are scheduled between 2021 and 2023 (unsecured funding for all
phases).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration &
ROW
$300,000
$300,000
Construction
$1,200,000
$1,500,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$300,000
$1,500,000
1 $1,500,000
a
31
Packet Pg. 114
6.A.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Pedestrian Improvements ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $250,000
(SR-104 off ramps)
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install pedestrian improvements at the two SR-104 Off ramps
entering onto Hwy. 99 (project identified in Hwy. 99 Sub Area Plan).
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve pedestrian conditions along the Hwy. 99
Corridor.
SCHEDULE: All Phases are scheduled between 2021 and 2023 (unsecured funding for all
phases).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration &
ROW
$50,000
Construction
$200,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$50,000
$200,000
a
32
Packet Pg. 115
6.A.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: SR-104 @ 226th St. SW / ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $194,000
15th St. SW Intersection Improvements
:#Vu
14TH WAY SW
226TH ST SW
Fuj 226TH PL SW
m- �
_ a �
M
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Extend the left turn lane for the westbound movement on SR-104.
Complete various pedestrian and bicycle intersection improvements. This project was
identified in the SR-104 Complete Streets Corridor Analysis (completed in 2015).
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve non -motorized transportation safety at the
intersection and improve traffic flow along the SR-104 corridor.
SCHEDULE: 2021-2022 (unsecured funding)
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration &
ROW
$30,000
Construction
$164,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$30,000
$164,000
a
33
Packet Pg. 116
6.A.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: SR-104 @ 95t" PI. W ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $495,000
Intersection Improvements
W
H
r
1 CC
rn
cl
17,111= iCeys11=[0
PARKING j
ST SW
WESTGATE
CHAPEL
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Upgrade all ADA Curb Ramps; and add C-Curb for access
management.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve intersection safety for pedestrians and vehicles.
SCHEDULE: 2021-2022 unsecured funding)
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration &
ROW
$75,000
Construction
$420,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$75,000
$420,000
34
Packet Pg. 117
6.A.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: SR-104 @ 238t" St. SW ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,338,000
Intersection Improvements
i
10
■
To Hwy 99
41�
239TH ST SW
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install traffic signal. The warrants are met for such an installation.
This project was identified in the SR-104 Complete Street Corridor Analysis (completed in
2015).
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve vehicular and pedestrian safety.
SCHEDULE: 2021-2022 unsecured funding)
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration &
ROW
$200,000
Construction
$1,138,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$200,000
$1,138,000
35
r
0
N
0
a�
a�
a
E
0
U
a
U-
U
Q
c
m
E
M
a
Packet Pg. 118
CITY OF EDMONDS
6.A.a
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Olympic View Dr. @ 76th Ave. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST:
W Intersection Improvements $1,183,000
N
SEAVIEW
PARK
3
PLSW
186TH ST SW
m m
I
I
I
I
I
1 .
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install traffic signal (the intersection currently stop controlled for
all movements). (ROADWAY ROJECT PRIORITY in 2015 Transportation Plan: #11).
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: The improvement will reduce the intersection delay. The
projected Level of Service is LOS F in 2035, which is below the City's concurrency standards
(LOS D). The project will improve the Level of Service to LOS B.
SCHEDULE: Engineering and Construction are scheduled between 2024 and 2038
(unsecured funding).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024-2038
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$200,000
Construction
$983,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$1,183,000
a
36
Packet Pg. 119
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: 84th Ave. W (212th St. SW ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $15,441,000
to 238th St. SW)
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Widen 84th Ave. W to (3) lanes with curb, gutter, bike lanes, and
sidewalk on each side of the street. (part of this project was ranked #6 in the Long Walkway list of
the 2015 Transportation Plan).
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve overall safety of the transportation system along this
collector street: 1) the sidewalk and bike lanes would provide pedestrians and cyclists with their own
facilities and 2) vehicles making left turn will have their own lane, not causing any back-up to the
through lane when insufficient gaps are provided.
SCHEDULE: Engineering and Construction are scheduled between 2024 and 2038
(unsecured funding). The project cost is split between Snohomish County and Edmonds since
half the project is in Esperance.
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024-2038
Planning/Study
Engineering &
$2,000,000
Administration
Construction
$13,441,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$15,441,000
* all or part of this project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts.
Q
37
Packet Pg. 120
6.A.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: SR-104 @ 100t" Ave. W ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,017,468
Intersection Improvements / Access
Management
EDMONDS WAY
! 7;: A
ROJECT DESCRIPTION: Implement Westgate Circulation Access Plan, install mid -block
pedestrian crossing along 100t" Ave. W, improve safety to access the driveways within
proximity to the intersection, and re -striping of 100t" Ave. W with the potential addition of bike
lanes. This project was identified in the SR-104 Completed Streets Corridor Analysis
completed in 2015).
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve access and safety at the intersection and
improve non -motorized transportation safety.
SCHEDULE: All phases are scheduled between 2021 and 2022 (unsecured funding)
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024-2038
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$150,000
Construction
$867,468
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$150,000
$867,468
0 a
a
38
Packet Pg. 121
6.A.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: SR-104 @ 76t" Ave. W ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $3,017,000
Intersection Improvements
3
W
H
c6
n
hd
J
- -EDL WIW Dri 1ELAY- _ - - — - - - - - _ LAKE BALLING €R WAY
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Add a 2nd left turn lane along SR-104. This project was identified
in the SR-104 Complete Street Corridor Analysis (completed in 2015).
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve access and safety at the intersection and
improve non -motorized transportation safety.
SCHEDULE: 2024-2038. The project cost would be split between Shoreline and Edmonds
since half the intersection is in Shoreline.
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024-2038
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$453,000
Construction
$2,564,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$3,017,000
a
39
Packet Pg. 122
6.A.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Olympic View Dr. @ 17411 St. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $610,000
SW Intersection Improvements
L+ 4 + — Meadowdale Middle School — — —
J-/, Parking L_
b 6WI St. Thomas Moore
—� a e
I Catholic School
B Ilfield
y
ary
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Widen Olympic View Dr. to add a northbound left turn lane for 50'
storage length. Shift the northbound lanes to the east to provide an acceleration lane for
eastbound left turns. Install traffic signal to increase the LOS and reduce intersection delay.
(ROADWAY ROJECT PRIORITY in 2015 Transportation Plan: #13)
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve intersection efficiency and safety of drivers
accessing either street.
SCHEDULE: Engineering and Construction are scheduled between 2024 and 2038
(unsecured funding).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024-2038
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$100,000
Construction
$510,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$610,000
a
40
Packet Pg. 123
6.A.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Sunset Ave Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $3,200,000
from Bell St to Caspers St.
,% '� ��► 111E01■�
♦ ♦ � I■IN 11111■ - I
��' IIIIIII :M1■�■1 ■
♦ ON �♦
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Provide a walkway on the west side of the street, facing
waterfront (— 112 mile / more recent project).
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: To provide a safe and desirable walking route.
SCHEDULE: Temporary improvements have been installed to evaluate the alignment of the
proposed walkway and parking alternatives. Construction isn't scheduled to occur until 2022
when utility improvements are scheduled along this stretch. No grant funding has been
secured for the construction phase. The design phase will be completed in 2021.
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT
COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$170,000
$295,000
Construction
$2,595,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$170,000
$295,000
$2,595,000
all or part of this project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts.
a
41
Packet Pg. 124
6.A.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: 23211d St. SW Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,305,000
from 100th Ave. W to SR-104
EDMONDS WAY
W SANK
iwnRs
LLI
L !
Ell
2 .
■ ■ Qy -
1
�i
p Al. 10
UUT H '
CHURCH ■ ■
■ , Uj
7 , ■
°�' ■ Jr
AW �I
o
�0. c, 2
' ' I ESTATES ODWAY OLy I _ PR
RK
g 9 Dorn 9 8 7 6 5
' 30 2 15
3 14 t
J \32 95 �1 32
■ r
�jr
`4 7 1
■ ■ ■ 73373 733,E
733os (0)
1 TM FF
-T p a
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk along 232nd St. SW from 100th Ave. W to SR-104.
This project ranked #3 in the Long Walkway List of 2015 Transportation Plan.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This project would improve pedestrian safety.
SCHEDULE: 2022-2023 (unsecured funding)
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$200,000
Construction
$1,105,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$200,000
$1,105,000
42
ti
0
N
0
T
d
A)
0.
E
0
a
LL
t�
T
a
E
M
a
Packet Pg. 125
6.A.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: 236th St. SW Walkway from ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $900,000
Edmonds Way to Madrona Elementary School
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Construct an — 800' sidewalk on the south side of 236th St. SW
from SR-104 to Madrona Elementary as well as the addition of sharrows along that stretch.
(This is only part of a stretch of Walkway project, which ranked #1 in the Long Walkway list in
the 2009 Transportation Plan)
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: To provide a safe and desirable walking route near
Madrona Elementary School and along 236th St. SW.
SCHEDULE: Construction was completed in June 2017. The project was funded through the
Safe Routes to School Grant program, Fund 422 for stormwater improvements, and REET
funds for the pavement reconstruction. The remaining funding is to complete the Federal
Documentation.
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration &
ROW
Construction
$7,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$7,000
43
Packet Pg. 126
6.A.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: 23611 St. SW Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,395,000
from Madrona Elementary to 97th Ave. W
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk with curb and gutter along 236nd St. SW from
Madrona Elementary to 97th Ave. W. This project ranked #4 in Long Walkway list of the 2015
Transportation Plan.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This project would improve pedestrian safety.
SCHEDULE: 2021-2022
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$213,000
Construction
$1,182,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$213,000
$1,182,000
T
a
E
M
a
44
Packet Pg. 127
6.A.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: 84th Ave. W Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $585,000
From 238th St. SW to 234th ST. SW
L
PARK-
nHIRL
EDMONDS GALL
APTS m
w
w LL
CH RIST LN TH E RAN CH N RCH O
PART{
& RIDE
OFFICE
_Y�
236:1 4SUHSET
23603 SAFEWAY $23605 WH L NJIHG R23607 23619 0
P
�1� R AURORAS NLkRHETPLACET
N
239TH ST SW
W SEOUL
23821 PLAZA
2
ff
23827
TRAVEL LODGE
0"
NORTH
ry HAVEN z
n MANOR w
a �
R p
r~ }
n•1L LO'N
13ROCK
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk along 84th Ave. W from 238th St .SW to 234th St.
SW, with curb and gutter. This project ranked #5 in the Long Walkway List of the 2015
Transportation Plan.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This project would improve pedestrian safety.
SCHEDULE: Begin design in 2023 (unsecured funding)
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024-2038
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$90,000
Construction
$495,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$90,000
$495,000
r
0
N
O
a
E
0
U
d
LL
U
Q
c
a�
E
�a
a
45
Packet Pg. 128
6.A.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: 801h Ave. W Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,439,000
from 206th St. SW to 212th ST. SW
I
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk along 80th Ave. W from 206th St. SW to 212th St.
SW with curb and gutter. This project ranked #1 in Long Walkway List of the 2015
Transportation Plan.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: The improvements will improve non -motorized
transportation safety including for school kids due to proximity of several schools).
SCHEDULE: 2021-2022 (funding unsecured).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration &
ROW
$210,000
Construction
$1,229,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$210,000
$1,229,000
46
Packet Pg. 129
6.A.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: 2nd Ave. S Walkway from ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $30,000
James St. to Main St.
4t
<1 NG
4
►.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Construct a missing link of sidewalk (approximately 100') on
2nd Ave. S between Main St. and James St. (Ranked #2 in Short Walkway Project list in
2015 Transportation Plan).
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: To provide a safe and desirable walking route.
SCHEDULE: 2021
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT
COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
-Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
Construction
$30,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$30,000
* all or part of this project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts
Q
47
Packet Pg. 130
6.A.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: 21811 St. SW Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,305,000
from 76th Ave. W to 84th Ave. W
MENNEN
YEMEN
■■E
■
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk along 218th St. SW from 76th Ave. W to 84th Ave.
W with curb and gutter. This project ranked #2 in Long Walkway List of the 2015
Transportation Plan.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: The improvements will improve pedestrian safety.
SCHEDULE: 2022-2023 unsecured funding
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration &
ROW
$200,000
Construction
$1,105,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$200,000
$1,105,000
48
ti
0
N
O
d
a
a
E
0
a
LL
C)
T
a
E
M
a
Packet Pg. 131
6.A.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Walnut St. Walkway from 3rd ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $105,000
Ave. S to 4t" Ave. S
ARTS
W ENTER
a
Z UNDOW NEI
N
ALDER
ALDER ST
346
414 412 410
arking
5
5
LA
UJ
o SOUND VIEW
o:
HOWELL WAY
W
a
x
v
DAYTON ST
tMILLTOWN
MAPLE ST
TRIC
ALDER ST
N
W
a FBECKWT'S
z
BAN K
T-
409 530Pancak
407 540 Hau s
4003 546 0
401 w
a
WALNUT Sr
--F
GREGORY
e
H
525
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Construct a missing link of sidewalk (approximately 350') on
Walnut St. between 3rd Ave. S and 4t" Ave. S (ranked #3 in Short Walkway Project list in 2015
Transportation Plan).
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: To provide a safe and desirable walking route.
SCHEDULE: Engineering & Construction scheduled for 2021 (unsecured funding).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$10,000
Construction
$95,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$105,000
all or part of this project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts
49
Packet Pg. 132
6.A.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: 216th St. SW Walkway from ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $157,000
Hwy. 99 to 72nd Ave. W
21400 �
JJ
7200 B&M
PARK & RIDE CONS
E ar-
MAN J
w 21410 21408 0.
� o � 21401 �
21412 v
M1 2140
U v
W
214G7
�507
�
w � W /
21511 j
`
{
M DONAL6'
IL y
21431 r
p I N
21521
rn
Ilk
N
0
M STEVEN
A
21500
COURT
AEGIS 21558 `
VALUE
21527
VILLAGE
21674
ST SW ��
216TJ1
120
:VEN5
tILION
21600 { 21619
KRUGER *Aq
CLINIC , �11
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install 150' sidewalk on north side of 216th St. SW from Hwy. 99 to
72nd Ave. W (completing a missing link on north side of stretch). This project ranked #4 in the
Short Walkway List (from 2015 Transportation Plan).
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: To provide a safe and desirable walking route.
SCHEDULE: Engineering & Construction scheduled for 2021 (unsecured funding).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$30,000
Construction
$127,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$157,000
* all or part of this project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts
a
50
Packet Pg. 133
6.A.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: 238th St. SW Walkway from ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $491,000
Hwy. 99 to SR-104
i
1
L
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Ranked #12 in Long Walkway list from 2015
Transportation Plan. Install 5' sidewalk on the north side of 238th St. SW.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve pedestrian safety along that stretch
and creating safe pedestrian connection between Hwy. 99 and 76th Ave. W.
SCHEDULE: The design phase was completed in early 2017. The project was
advertised in May 2017 but the lowest bid was rejected since it was over budget.
The project will be re -advertised in early 2018. A TIB grant was secured to fund
the design and construction phases.
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
Construction
$370,977
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$370,977
* all or part of this project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts.
ti
0
N
O
d
A)
a
E
0
a
U.
c.�
T
a
E
0
M
a
51
Packet Pg. 134
6.A.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Elm Way Walkway from ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $789,000
8t" Ave. S to 9t" Ave. S
4
�^
I
r.
1
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk along Elm Way from 8t" Ave. S to 9t" Ave. S. This
project ranked #6 in the Short Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: This project would improve pedestrian safety.
SCHEDULE: 2021-2022 (funding unsecured).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$156,000
Construction
$633,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$156,000
$633,000
52
a
Packet Pg. 135
6.A.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Maplewood Dr. Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,591,000
from Main St. to 2001h St. SW
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Construct sidewalk on Maplewood Dr. from Main St. to 200th St.
SW (- 2,700'). A sidewalk currently exists on 200th St. SW from Main St. to 76th Ave. W,
adjacent to Maplewood Elementary School (rated #22 in the Long Walkway list of the 2015
Transportation Plan).
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Create pedestrian connection between Maplewood
Elementary School on 200th St. SW and Main St., by encouraging kids to use non -motorized
transportation to walk to / from school.
SCHEDULE: Engineering scheduled for 2021 and construction in 2022 / 2023 (funding
unsecured).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Planning/Study
Engineering &
$230,000
Administration
Construction
$681,000
$680,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$230,000
$681,000
$680,000
* all or part of this project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts.
ti
0
N
O
d
a�
a
0
IL
U.
T
a
c
m
E
z
M
Q
53
Packet Pg. 136
6.A.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Dayton St Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $250,000
between 3R1 Ave. S and 9t" Ave. S
.K
uysr �° a
ay T F
�MFS St M�
51 1� i
' - -
sue., L
---------------------
o- MAIM Si
-----------------
I
k A r._ii . ��
, ���
a _�i�*
IPSM
1
iil���1
I
AUXRSr--
=WAURMS�
■jjII ll��-y {�I
WALNUT SI
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Construct a missing link of sidewalk Dayton St. between 7tn
Ave. S and 8t" Ave. S and additional sidewalk improvements along the rest of the stretch
(ranked #2 in Short Walkway Project list in 2015 Transportation Plan).
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: To provide a safe and desirable walking route.
SCHEDULE: Engineering & Construction scheduled for 2018 and 2019. A TIB grant was
secured for this project in 2016.
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT
COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$27,500
Construction
$200,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$27,500
$200,000
" all or part of this project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts.
0
N
O
a�
a
a
E
0
U
a
U_
U
H
H
Q
c
m
E
t
M
Q
54
Packet Pg. 137
6.A.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: 951h PI. W Walkway from ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $550,000
224th ST. SW to 220th St. SW
F
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk along 95th PI. W from 224th ST. SW to
220th ST. SW, with curb and gutter. This project ranked #9 in the Long Walkway
List of the 2015 Transportation Plan.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This project would improve pedestrian safety.
SCHEDULE: Engineering scheduled for 2021 and construction in 2022 (funding
unsecured).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$105,000
Construction
$445,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$105,000
$445,000
55
Packet Pg. 138
6.A.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Minor Sidewalk Program ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: varies
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Complete missing sidewalk along short segments throughout the
City.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve pedestrian safety.
SCHEDULE: 2018
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration &
ROW
$10,000
Construction
$90,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$100,000
56
Packet Pg. 139
6.A.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Railroad Ave. Sidewalk from ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $862,000
Dayton St. to SR-104
bt.
4� fi
�tio-P W NAYTON 5T
P❑
c'
r�
j
a
? Fo
�ONn.
ea a
--^ DAYTON ST
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install new and wider sidewalk along Railroad St. from
Dayton St. to SR-104.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve non -motorized transportation safety along
Railroad St. from Dayton St. to SR-104, key stretch since connects to various destination
points such as Senior Center, Port of Edmonds, Downtown Edmonds... .
SCHEDULE: All Phases are scheduled in 2021 and 2022 (unsecured funding for all
phases). A TAP grant application was submitted in September '17 to fund the design and
construction phases. A 13.5% local match is required. The ROW phase will be funded by the
City.
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration &
ROW
$145,000
Construction
$555,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$145,000
$555,000
57
0
N
0
a�
r
0
U
IL
LL
U
Q
r
c
E
a
Packet Pg. 140
6.A.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Hwy. 99 @ SR-104 ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $700,000
Multi -Use path improvements
s� tia 1 jl
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install new non -motorized asphalt path along SR-104 from
SR-104 @ 240t" St. SW to Hwy. 99 @ 244t" St. SW.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve non -motorized transportation conditions along
the SR-104 / Hwy. 99 Corridors since this path is currently not easily accessible due to
significant uprooting.
SCHEDULE: All Phases are scheduled in 2021 and 2022 (unsecured funding for all
phases). A TAP grant application was submitted in September '17 to fund the design and
construction phases. A 13.5% local match is required. The ROW phase will be funded by the
City.
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration &
ROW
$145,000
Construction
$555,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$145,000
$555,000
a
58
Packet Pg. 141
6.A.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: SR-104 @ 76th Ave. W non- ESTIMATED PROJECT COST:
motorized transportation safety improvements $1,100,000
I
�49 kd,,AGN OS WA, aFFRA PIP i�
LAKE UtLINGER WAY T1E)PAONas WAV
.. _%
.2111 751 sw i
242Nb PL SW
I _LL I `-I� ■ `1�
r � �
LAKL UAL1.INGER WAY
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Extend bike lanes within proximity of the intersection in
northbound and southbound directions. Install APS on all corners and new ADA curb
ramps.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve non -motorized transportation safety along
this section of the Interurban Trail.
SCHEDULE: All Phases are scheduled in 2021 and 2022 (unsecured funding for all
phases). A TAP grant application was submitted in September '17 to fund the design and
construction phases. The City of Shoreline would fund the local match. The ROW phase
will be funded by the City.
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration &
ROW
$220,000
Construction
$880,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$220,000
$880,000
a
59
Packet Pg. 142
6.A.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: 191th St. SW Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $630,000
from 80th Ave. W to 76th Ave. W
z
a
i r
192ND PL 5W
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk along 191th St. SW from 80th Ave. W to 76th Ave.,
with curb and gutter. This project ranked #8 in Long Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation
Plan.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This project would improve pedestrian safety.
SCHEDULE: 2024-2038
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024-2038
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$90,000
Construction
$540,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$630,000
a
60
Packet Pg. 143
6.A.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: 10411 Ave. W Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $990,000
from 238th St. SW to 106th Ave. W
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk along 104th Ave. W from 238th ST. SW to 106th
Ave. W, with curb and gutter. This project ranked #10 in the Long Walkway List of the 2015
Transportation Plan.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This project would improve pedestrian safety.
SCHEDULE: 2024-2038
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024-2038
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$150,000
Construction
$840,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$990,000
61
Packet Pg. 144
6.A.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: 80th Ave. W Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $315,000
from 218th St. SW to 220th St. SW
n
STEVE
Golden
,
HEAL
Leaves
i
EVENS
A K
—
LEGEND
WES1
x
ESTATES
ISLE
-
'
J
a
218TH ST SW
781 r
r
L
-
219TH ST SW
r m
M1
-
or
Iti -
--- -----_228TH ST SW
—-------�T---------
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk along 80th Ave. W from 218th ST. SW to 220th ST.
SW, with curb and gutter. This project ranked #7 in the Short Walkway List of the 2015
Transportation Plan.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This project would improve pedestrian safety.
SCHEDULE: 2024-2038
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024-2038
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$55,000
Construction
$260,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$315,000
62
ti
0
N
O
T
d
a
E
0
a
IL
c�
T
F-
a
c
as
E
a
Packet Pg. 145
6.A.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: 841h Ave. W Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $315,000
from 188th St. SW to 186th St. SW
Sw ��lUJ
ucq�
Wr ri186TH ST W
i
■-d6
9P'`
`
,7
��
■
w
r■
i-�
--. r
■
18 TH
5 5W
■
i s
-
F
A
z�BrN
5
r5w
L
r
l
1
-■
�- I, I SFAMFW
!u � 0 � I - � �E, �-Er- Y"
I
-a-
°r
,
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk along 84th Ave. W from 188th St. SW to 186th St.
SW., with curb and gutter. This project ranked #5 in Short Walkway List of the 2015
Transportation Plan.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This project would improve pedestrian safety.
SCHEDULE: 2024-2038
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024-2038
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$60,000
Construction
$255,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$315,000
r
O
N
0
m
m
a
E
0
U
a
LL
U
Q
c
a�
E
M
a
63
Packet Pg. 146
6.A.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: 2361h St. SW Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $765,000
from Hwy 99 to 76th Ave. W
rM bI III -.P%
PARK
& RIDE
236TH ST SIN_
23601
23603 SAFE'
23605 L K.
23607 NON
0
W
Q
X Id
10-
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk along 236th St. SW from Hwy 99 to 76th Ave. W.
This project ranked #11 in Long Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This project would improve pedestrian safety.
SCHEDULE: 2024-2038
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024-2038
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$115,000
Construction
$650,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$765,000
64
Packet Pg. 147
6.A.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: 2381h St. SW Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,170,000
from Hwy 99 to 76th Ave. W
� PARK �•nrIRL
NA LN EOMOHos BALL
APTS
' • 1 � � � � I r • w
NORTH m
CH RIST LH THE RAN CHURCH Ov
N
PARK R ~ �+
& RIDE
OFFICE
2 TH T
23667 , I
r 23663 SAFEWAY �
23606 N4N L KJIHG R '
2367667 SUNSET
L • . 239 O
P '•n•1L LO•n:
Q , BROOK
R AURORA rotas
- ` S MARKETPLACE
T 1�
H FA MILV PA NCAKE '
r V �7-77„ -
238TH 5T 5W
■ 1 `
L821
seouL PLAZA _ 1
' MEN-
23627TRAVEL LOO EEST. FRANC-M IHHBA TA CO TIM MOTEL�WHSE�•� 1:11 RIl RIl II F 1■ ■ ■
IN
0
E
:yA
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk along 238th St. SW from Hwy. 99 to 76th Ave. W
This project ranked #12 in Long Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This project would improve pedestrian safety.
SCHEDULE: 2024-2038
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024-2038
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$175,000
Construction
$995,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$1,170,000
a
65
Packet Pg. 148
6.A.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: 801h Ave. W / 180th St. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,350,000
SW Walkway from 188th St. SW to OVD
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk along 80th Ave. W from 188th St. SW to OVD. This
project ranked #13 in Long Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This project would improve pedestrian safety.
SCHEDULE: 2024-2038
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024-2038
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$270,000
Construction
$1,080,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$1,350,000
a
66
Packet Pg. 149
6.A.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: 189th PI. SW Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $585,000
from 80th Ave. W to 76th Ave. W
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk along 189th PI. SW from 80th Ave. W to 76th Ave.
W. This project ranked #14 in Long Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This project would improve pedestrian safety.
SCHEDULE: 2024-2038
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024-2038
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$115,000
Construction
$470,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$585,000
a
67
Packet Pg. 150
6.A.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Ferry Storage ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $357,000
Improvements from Pine St. Dayton St.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Modify existing lane channelization on SR104 to add vehicle
storage for ferry users.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Reduce conflicts between ferry storage and access to
local driveways.
SCHEDULE: 2021 (unsecured funding)
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$50,000
Construction
$307,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$357,000
a
68
Packet Pg. 151
CITY OF EDMONDS
6.A.a
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Edmonds Street Overpass ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $29,000,000
FiA
A"
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This project builds a grade -separated overcrossing over the railroad
tracks as an extension of Edmonds Street connecting to Brackett's Landing north park (project
identified in Edmonds Waterfront Alternatives Access Study completed in 2016).
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Provide access for emergency vehicles, pedestrians, and
bicycles. The overpass could be utilized to offload passenger vehicles from a ferry during an
extended closure of the railroad track crossings.
SCHEDULE: 2018-2038. A State Appropriation for $700,000 was secured in 2017. Community
Transit, Sound Transit, BNSF, and the Port of Edmonds are contributed $140,000 to get this projec
started (Unsecured funding for Design and Construction Phases).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024-203E
Planning/Study
$175,000
$1,285,000
Engineering &
$1,000,000
$1,000,000
Administration
Right of Way /
$1,000,000
$1,000,000
Environment
Mitigation
Construction
$12,000,000
$11,000,00
TOTAL
$700,000
$1,285,000
$2,000,00
$2,000,000
$12,000,000
$11,000,00
a
69
Packet Pg. 152
6.A.a
CFP
STORMWATER
Q
70
Packet Pg. 153
/
2\,
Een
Lu
w§ate
0
ALL
320
\m
0
coo coo
coo coo
coo coo
coo coo
coo oo
coo coo
Im
o
j\\/o u)1.
\5 \_\/0
J7)§ 7)/ -§
\)4 {w /)4
§!_\\# _ \g _
ch
\cj �\�k
k
# 2 2
o\\
\a &o
}\ o«
;e
% \§,
- E�§
cL
o
o
o
CL ) &
)� k
\� kj>
_o
/§\
\2 = )kk
7 ; ] ± LL
76
12
!/\
k{ \ �E)
® ) \\}
/§ \ >
}§\
71
�
k
0
CD
E
0
U
a
b
�
«
§
E
2
a
2
Packet Pg.�4
6.A.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: 228t" St. SW from Hwy. 99 ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $10,421,000
to 95t" PI. W
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Widen 228t" St. SW from Hwy. 99 to 95t" Pl. W to three lanes
(with two-way left turn lane), with curb and gutter, sidewalk, and bike lanes.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This project would improve pedestrian safety and traffic
flow along this corridor.
SCHEDULE: The design phase is scheduled to begin in 2022 (pending funding).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024-2038
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$75,000
$300,000
Construction
$10,046,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$75,000
$300,000
$10,046,000
a
72
Packet Pg. 155
6.A.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: 761h Ave W @ 21211 St. SW ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $6,500,000
Intersection Improvements
1
i
i
0
tUMUNUb-VVUUUVVHY
HIGH SCHOOL
man
W
a
R
Fi
L`
7301
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Add a northbound and southbound left -turn lane to convert the signal
operation for those approaches from split phasing to protected -permissive phasing. Add a right -turn
lane for the westbound, southbound, and northbound movements. The project also consists of
various utility upgrades and conversion of overhead utilities to underground.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Reduce the intersection delay and improve the existing level
of service to LOS C.
SCHEDULE: Design was completed in May 2016. The project was advertised in June 2016 but the
lowest bid was rejected since it was - approx. $1.3 Million over budget. The project was re -advertised in
February 2017 (under budget) and construction began in May 2017. The project is scheduled to be
completed in December 2017. A TIB grant was secured to cover the shortfall.
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration &
ROW
Construction
$353,740
1 % for Art
TOTAL $353,740
r
0
N
0
m
a
a
E
0
U
a
LL
U
t—
Q
c
m
E
M
a
73
Packet Pg. 156
6.A.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Highway 99 ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $190,000,000
Gateway/Revitalization
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The project would include, among other features, wider replacement
sidewalks or new sidewalk where none exist today, new street lighting, center medians for access
control and turning movements, etc., attractive and safe crosswalks, better stormwater
management, targeted utility replacements, potential undergrounding of overhead utilities,
landscaping and other softscape treatments to identify the area as being in Edmonds.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve aesthetics, safety, user experience, and access
management along this corridor. In addition, economic development would be improved.
SCHEDULE: The design phase is scheduled to begin in September 2017 and should be
completed between 2024 and 2038 (pending addition funding / $10M from Connecting
Washington allocation has been secured).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024-2038
COST
Planning/Study
Engineering &
$440,000
$426,000
$5,000,000
$4,300,000
$10,000,000
Administration
& ROW
Construction
$170,000,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$440,000
$426,000
$5,000,000
$4,300,000
$10,000,000
$170,000,000
a
74
Packet Pg. 157
6.A.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: SR-524 (19611 St. SW)/ 88' ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $903,000
Ave. W Intersection Improvements
SEVEN DAY
ADVENl1ST
CHURCH 4
196TH Sf SW
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install traffic signal at the intersection of 196th St. SW @ 88th Ave. W.
The modeling in the 2009 Transportation Plan indicated that restricting northbound and
southbound traffic to right -turn -only (prohibiting left -turn and through movements) would also
address the deficiency identified at this location through 2025. This is same alternative as one
concluded by consultant in 2007 study but not recommended by City Council. This could be
implemented as an alternate solution, or as an interim solution until traffic signal warrants are
met. The ex. LOS is F (below City Standards: LOS D). This project was ranked #6 in the
Roadway Project Priority in the 2015 Transportation Plan.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve traffic flow characteristics and safety at the
intersection. The improvement would modify LOS to A, but increase the delay along 196th St. SW.
SCHEDULE: The intersection LOS must meet MUTCD traffic signal warrants and be approved
by WSDOT since 196th St. SW is a State Route (SR524). No funding is currently allocated to this
project (pending grant funding).
COST
BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Planning/Study
Engineering &
$193,000
$175,000
Administration &
ROW
Construction
$535,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$193,000
$175,000
$535,000
a
75
Packet Pg. 158
CITY OF EDMONDS
6.A.a
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Main St and 9t" Ave. S ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $896,000
-11 Rk- �L_
BELL ST
M _
a
x
MAIN ST
J J _ L
WADEJAMES
`J THEATER
7111 W � �
a
x
H
DAYTON ST
�Z
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Installation of a traffic signal (or mini -roundabout is an alternative
solution).
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: The existing intersection is stop -controlled for all
approaches and the projected intersection LOS in 2035 is LOS F (below the City's
concurrency standards: LOS D). The installation of a traffic signal would improve the
intersection delay to LOS B. The project ranked #4 in the Roadway Project Priority of the 2015
Transportation Plan.
SCHEDULE: All phases are scheduled between 2020 and 2021 (unsecured funding)
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$120,000
Construction
$776,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$120,000
$776,000
a
76
Packet Pg. 159
6.A.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: 220th St SW @ 76th Ave W T$',925,000
TIMATED PROJECT COST:
Intersection Improvements
2,9rH sr sw
J
21919
J
J J
3 414
I' Lri
,a
Ui
in
J _J
1 2215TPLSW
TOP FOODS JSTARBU KS
J
220TH ST SW —
1
r
LYNWOOD
HONDA
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Reconfigure eastbound lanes to a left turn lane and through / right
turn lane. Change eastbound and westbound phases to provide protected -permitted phase for
eastbound and westbound left turns. Provide right turn overlap for westbound movement during
southbound left turn phase. (ROADWAY ROJECT PRIORITY #1 in 2015 Transportation Plan).
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Reduce the intersection delay and improve the LOS. The
projected LOS in 2035 would be improved from LOS F to LOS D.
SCHEDULE: Engineering, ROW, and construction scheduled between 2018 and 2023
(unsecured funding).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Planning/Study
Engineering & ROW
$55,000
$330,000
$1,800,000
Administration
Construction
$3,795,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$55,000
$330,000
$1,800,000
$3,795,000
' All or a portion of this project may quality for 1 % for the arts
77
Packet Pg. 160
6.A.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Hwy. 99 @ 212th St. SW ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $2,806,000
intersection improvements
i J
21 g sw I
i
w
W Pa Nung
s gn
shop
/
n
7373
P.U.B
3 Edmonds
Edmonds
/
W Family Clinic ei
Public 17-ks
ADX
KENNEL
21 1
27114 /
f Arbor
Q
2I /
P.
27109
R
n
lle Box /
/
212TH ST SW
7,.5�• CUPIC
a
LZF
"3'2"
PARK & RIDE
215TH
W
ST SW
U
o:
W
0
a
PLANT
AEGIS
W mMSWEDISH
DNnS CRM Pl15 '
ALLIED /
ROOFING /
/
/
B&M /
CON ST
21414 /
21448 /
/
/
NCnONRLD'
/ 01
1ALUE /
PILLAGE /
16TH ST/SW
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Widen 21211 St. SW to add a westbound left turn lane for 200'
storage length and an eastbound left turn lane for 300' storage length. Provide protected left
turn phase for eastbound and westbound movements. (ROADWAY PROJECT PRIORITY in
2015 Transportation Plan: #4)
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve intersection efficiency and reduce delay.
SCHEDULE: All phases are scheduled between 2021 and 2023 (unsecured funding).The
project cost is split between Lynnwood and Edmonds since half the project is within Lynnwood.
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Planning/Study
Engineering,
ROW, &
Administration
$175,000
$1,091,000
Construction
$1,540,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$175,000
$1,091,000
$1,540,000
0
N
O
a�
r
a�
a
E
0
U
a
LL
U
Q
c
a�
E
a
78
Packet Pg. 161
6.A.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Hwy. 99 @ 216th St. SW ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $2,335,000
intersection improvements
c^
2141021
13�408w
214021d12 {
21405
N
04
LU
U
2> 120L<
2i431MC�UHA6'
un
nz
150
r
2150021558EGIS
VALUE
VILLAGE
ST
qw
�/ �
• 216TH
21600 {� 21619
KRUGER
CLINIC f
"'01 r
21632 � � -
��I16e
2
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Widen 216th St. SW to add a westbound left turn lane for and an
eastbound left turn lane. Provide protected -permissive left turn phases for eastbound and
westbound movements. This project ranked #3 in the Roadway Project Priority in the 2015
Transportation Plan.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve intersection efficiency and reduce delay.
SCHEDULE: All phases are scheduled between 2021 and 2023 (unsecured funding).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Planning/Study
Engineering &
ROW &
Administration
$164,000
$334,000
Construction
$1,837,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$164,000
$334,000
$1,837,000
a
79
Packet Pg. 162
6.A.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Hwy. 99 @ 220t" St. SW ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $3,215,000
intersection improvements
19TH sT SW
21919
f,ill
7514
221 ST PL SW
I
I
I
13
-- a
n
I
[:Z/II
TOP FOODS
220TH Sr SW
LYNWOOD
HONOR a
iL
FUN TA 91A
H'S IN N
L7
w .F 7223'J'
A.dy'.
� td .D. 7391 R
A
a S
H ¢ nm
rsw
TIN
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Widen 220t" St. SW to add Westbound right turn lane for 325'
storage length. Widen SR-99 to add 2nd Southbound left turn lane for 275' storage length.
(ROADWAY PROJECT PRIORITY in 2015 Transportation Plan: #1).
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Reduce intersection delay and improve traffic flow and
safety.
SCHEDULE: All Phases are scheduled between 2021 and 2023 (unsecured funding for all
phases).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
COST
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
& ROW
$175,000
$1,085,000
Construction
$1,955,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$175,000
$1,085,000
$1,955,000
ti
0
N
O
T
d
a�
a
E
0
c�
a
LL
0
T
F_
a
c
as
E
M
a
so
Packet Pg. 163
6.A.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Hwy. 99 @ 234th St. SW ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $3,300,000
intersection improvements
ESPEMNCE
FS -
21207
S7ND PL W
�• �I� 2f731 .- F
'1 �233RD PL
'71J7tl' i _ e :331•. !9„ ]y0! 7131 -
Y"i �
2]40 o DIM 111 , 1717
ri 411 .,.
7yn7] -]y{f p uW
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install traffic signal at the intersection of Hwy. 99 @ 234th St.
SW to provide safer crossing of Hwy. 99 for vehicles and non -motorized transportation
(project identified in Hwy. 99 Sub Area Plan).
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve intersection safety and pedestrian conditions
along the corridor.
SCHEDULE: All Phases are scheduled between 2021 and 2023 (unsecured funding for all
phases).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration &
ROW
$300,000
$300,000
Construction
$1,200,000
$1,500,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$300,000
$1,500,000
1 $1,500,000
a
81
Packet Pg. 164
6.A.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Pedestrian Improvements ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $250,000
(SR-104 off ramps)
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install pedestrian improvements at the two SR-104 Off ramps
entering onto Hwy. 99 (project identified in Hwy. 99 Sub Area Plan).
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve pedestrian conditions along the Hwy. 99
Corridor.
SCHEDULE: All Phases are scheduled between 2021 and 2022 (unsecured funding for all
phases).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration &
ROW
$50,000
Construction
$200,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$50,000
$200,000
a
sz
Packet Pg. 165
6.A.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: SR-104 @ 226th St. SW / ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $194,000
15th St. SW Intersection Improvements
:#Vu
14TH WAY SW
226TH ST SW
Fuj 226TH PL SW
m- �
_ a �
M
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Extend the left turn lane for the westbound movement on SR-104.
Complete various pedestrian and bicycle intersection improvements. This project was
identified in the SR-104 Complete Streets Corridor Analysis (completed in 2015).
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve non -motorized transportation safety at the
intersection and improve traffic flow along the SR-104 corridor.
SCHEDULE: 2021-2022 (unsecured funding)
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration &
ROW
$30,000
Construction
$164,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$30,000
$164,000
a
83
Packet Pg. 166
6.A.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: SR-104 @ 95t" PI. W ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $495,000
Intersection Improvements
W
H
r
1 CC
rn
cl
17,111= iCeys11=[0
PARKING j
ST SW
WESTGATE
CHAPEL
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Upgrade all ADA Curb Ramps; and add C-Curb for access
management.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve intersection safety for pedestrians and vehicles.
SCHEDULE: 2021-2022 unsecured funding)
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration &
ROW
$75,000
Construction
$420,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$75,000
$420,000
84
Packet Pg. 167
6.A.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: SR-104 @ 238t" St. SW ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,338,000
Intersection Improvements
i
10
■
To Hwy 99
41�
239TH ST SW
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install traffic signal. The warrants are met for such an installation.
This project was identified in the SR-104 Complete Street Corridor Analysis (completed in
2015).
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve vehicular and pedestrian safety.
SCHEDULE: 2021-2022 unsecured funding)
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration &
ROW
$200,000
Construction
$1,138,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$200,000
$1,138,000
85
0
N
0
a�
r
a�
a
E
0
U
a
U-
U
Q
r
c
a�
E
a
Packet Pg. 168
CITY OF EDMONDS
6.A.a
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Olympic View Dr. @ 76th Ave. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST:
W Intersection Improvements $1,183,000
N
SEAVIEW
PARK
3
PLSW
186TH ST SW
m m
I
I
I
I
I
1 .
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install traffic signal (the intersection currently stop controlled for
all movements). (ROADWAY ROJECT PRIORITY in 2015 Transportation Plan: #11).
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: The improvement will reduce the intersection delay. The
projected Level of Service is LOS F in 2035, which is below the City's concurrency standards
(LOS D). The project will improve the Level of Service to LOS B.
SCHEDULE: Engineering and Construction are scheduled between 2024 and 2038
(unsecured funding).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024-2038
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$200,000
Construction
$983,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$1,183,000
a
86
Packet Pg. 169
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: 84th Ave. W (212th St. SW ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $15,441,000
to 238th St. SW)
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Widen 84th Ave. W to (3) lanes with curb, gutter, bike lanes, and
sidewalk on each side of the street. (part of this project was ranked #6 in the Long Walkway list of
the 2015 Transportation Plan).
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve overall safety of the transportation system along this
collector street: 1) the sidewalk and bike lanes would provide pedestrians and cyclists with their own
facilities and 2) vehicles making left turn will have their own lane, not causing any back-up to the
through lane when insufficient gaps are provided.
SCHEDULE: Engineering and Construction are scheduled between 2024 and 2038
(unsecured funding). The project cost is split between Snohomish County and Edmonds since
half the project is in Esperance.
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024-2038
Planning/Study
Engineering &
$2,000,000
Administration
Construction
$13,441,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$15,441,000
* all or part of this project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts.
Q
87
Packet Pg. 170
6.A.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: SR-104 @ 100t" Ave. W ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,017,468
Intersection Improvements / Access
Management
EDMONDS WAY
! 7;: A
ROJECT DESCRIPTION: Implement Westgate Circulation Access Plan, install mid -block
pedestrian crossing along 100t" Ave. W, improve safety to access the driveways within
proximity to the intersection, and re -striping of 100t" Ave. W with the potential addition of bike
lanes. This project was identified in the SR-104 Completed Streets Corridor Analysis
completed in 2015).
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve access and safety at the intersection and
improve non -motorized transportation safety.
SCHEDULE: All phases are scheduled between 2021 and 2022 (unsecured funding)
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024-2038
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$150,000
Construction
$867,468
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$150,000
$867,468
0 a
a
88
Packet Pg. 171
6.A.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: SR-104 @ 76t" Ave. W ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $3,017,000
Intersection Improvements
ILI
1 w:
.W..%-Il i'' i'V 240TR PL SW. 'I i751M Sw
HT -LW
T I�, Ie2NV PL SW _
I438G PC SW . _ '
,$ �V4
0 as
u f,
V78 LN)111
LAKE 8AL C ING[-R WAY_ - _ - -- _ MP EF M(MDS WAY 71LKE eACL114GEi�1fVRl' -- -
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Add a 2nd left turn lane along SR-104. This project was identified
in the SR-104 Complete Street Corridor Analysis (completed in 2015).
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve access and safety at the intersection and
improve non -motorized transportation safety.
SCHEDULE: 2024-2038. The project cost would be split between Shoreline and Edmonds
since half the intersection is in Shoreline.
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024-2038
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$453,000
Construction
$2,564,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$3,017,000
a
89
Packet Pg. 172
6.A.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Olympic View Dr. @ 174t" St. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $610,000
SW Intersection Improvements
L+ 4 + — Meadowdale Middle School — — —
J-/, Parking L_
b 6WI St. Thomas Moore
—� a e
I Catholic School
B Ilfield
y
ar,
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Widen Olympic View Dr. to add a northbound left turn lane for 50'
storage length. Shift the northbound lanes to the east to provide an acceleration lane for
eastbound left turns. Install traffic signal to increase the LOS and reduce intersection delay.
ROADWAY ROJECT PRIORITY in 2015 Transportation Plan: #13
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve intersection efficiency and safety of drivers
accessing either street.
SCHEDULE: Engineering and Construction are scheduled between 2024 and 2038
(unsecured funding).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024-2038
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$100,000
Construction
$510,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$610,000
a
90
Packet Pg. 173
6.A.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Sunset Ave Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $3,200,000
from Bell St to Caspers St.
,% '� ��► 111E01■�
♦ ♦ � I■IN 11111■ - I
��' IIIIIII :M1■�■1 ■
♦ ON �♦
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Provide a walkway on the west side of the street, facing
waterfront (— 112 mile / more recent project).
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: To provide a safe and desirable walking route.
SCHEDULE: Temporary improvements have been installed to evaluate the alignment of the
proposed walkway and parking alternatives. Construction isn't scheduled to occur until 2022
when utility improvements are scheduled along this stretch. No grant funding has been
secured for the construction phase. The design phase will be completed in 2021.
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT
COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$245,900
$295,000
Construction
$2,595,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$245,900
$295,000
$2,595,000
all or part of this project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts.
a
91
Packet Pg. 174
6.A.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: 232nd St. SW Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,305,000
from 100th Ave. W to SR-104
EDMONDS WAY
W E:4NK a,A A,
MARS
REC OM 98 7 6 5
RO
24
71_ _143 7�
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk along 232nd St. SW from 100th Ave. W to SR-104.
This project ranked #3 in the Long Walkway List of 2015 Transportation Plan.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This project would improve pedestrian safety.
SCHEDULE: 2022-2023 (unsecured funding)
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$200,000
Construction
$1,105,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$200,000
$1,105,000
a
92
Packet Pg. 175
6.A.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: 236th St. SW Walkway from ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $900,000
Edmonds Way to Madrona Elementary School
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Construct an — 800' sidewalk on the south side of 236th St. SW
from SR-104 to Madrona Elementary as well as the addition of sharrows along that stretch.
(This is only part of a stretch of Walkway project, which ranked #1 in the Long Walkway list in
the 2009 Transportation Plan)
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: To provide a safe and desirable walking route near
Madrona Elementary School and along 236th St. SW.
SCHEDULE: Construction was completed in June 2017. The project was funded through the
Safe Routes to School Grant program, Fund 422 for stormwater improvements, and REET
funds for the pavement reconstruction. The remaining funding is to complete the Federal
Documentation.
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration &
ROW
Construction
$7,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$7,000
93
Packet Pg. 176
6.A.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: 23611 St. SW Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,395,000
from Madrona Elementary to 97th Ave. W
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk with curb and gutter along 236nd St. SW from
Madrona Elementary to 97th Ave. W. This project ranked #4 in Long Walkway list of the 2015
Transportation Plan.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This project would improve pedestrian safety.
SCHEDULE: 2021-2022
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$213,000
Construction
$1,182,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$213,000
$1,182,000
T
a
E
M
a
94
Packet Pg. 177
6.A.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: 84th Ave. W Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $585,000
From 238th St. SW to 234th ST. SW
L
PARK-
nHIRL
EDMONDS GALL
APTS m
w
w LL
CH RIST LN TH E RAN CH N RCH O
PART{
& RIDE
OFFICE
_Y�
236:1 4SUHSET
23603 SAFEWAY $23605 WH L NJIHG R23607 23619 0
P
�1� R AURORAS NLkRHETPLACET
N
239TH ST SW
W SEOUL
23821 PLAZA
2
ff
23827
TRAVEL LODGE
0"
NORTH
ry HAVEN z
n MANOR w
a �
R p
r~ }
n•1L LO'N
13ROCK
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk along 84th Ave. W from 238th St .SW to 234th St.
SW, with curb and gutter. This project ranked #5 in the Long Walkway List of the 2015
Transportation Plan.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This project would improve pedestrian safety.
SCHEDULE: Begin design in 2023 (unsecured funding)
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024-2038
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$90,000
Construction
$495,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$90,000
$495,000
r
0
N
O
a
E
0
U
d
LL
U
Q
c
a�
E
�a
a
95
Packet Pg. 178
6.A.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: 801h Ave. W Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,439,000
from 206th St. SW to 212th ST. SW
I
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk along 80th Ave. W from 206th St. SW to 212th St.
SW with curb and gutter. This project ranked #1 in Long Walkway List of the 2015
Transportation Plan.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: The improvements will improve non -motorized
transportation safety including for school kids due to proximity of several schools).
SCHEDULE: 2021-2022 (funding unsecured).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration &
ROW
$210,000
Construction
$1,229,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$210,000
$1,229,000
96
Packet Pg. 179
6.A.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: 2nd Ave. S Walkway from ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $30,000
James St. to Main St.
4t
<1 NG
4
►.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Construct a missing link of sidewalk (approximately 100') on
2nd Ave. S between Main St. and James St. (Ranked #2 in Short Walkway Project list in
2015 Transportation Plan).
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: To provide a safe and desirable walking route.
SCHEDULE: 2021
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT
COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
-Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
Construction
$30,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$30,000
* all or part of this project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts
Q
97
Packet Pg. 180
6.A.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: 21811 St. SW Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,305,000
from 76th Ave. W to 84th Ave. W
MENNEN
YEMEN
■■E
■
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk along 218th St. SW from 76th Ave. W to 84th Ave.
W with curb and gutter. This project ranked #2 in Long Walkway List of the 2015
Transportation Plan.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: The improvements will improve pedestrian safety.
SCHEDULE: 2022-2023 unsecured funding
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration &
ROW
$200,000
Construction
$1,105,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$200,000
$1,105,000
98
ti
0
N
O
d
a
a
E
0
a
LL
C)
T
a
E
M
a
Packet Pg. 181
6.A.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Walnut St. Walkway from 3rd ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $105,000
Ave. S to 4t" Ave. S
ARTS
W ENTER
a
Z UNDOW NEI
N
ALDER
ALDER ST
346
414 412 410
arking
5
5
LA
UJ
o SOUND VIEW
o:
HOWELL WAY
W
a
x
v
DAYTON ST
tMILLTOWN
MAPLE ST
TRIC
ALDER ST
N
W
a FBECKWT'S
z
BAN K
T-
409 530Pancak
407 540 Hau s
4003 546 0
401 w
a
WALNUT Sr
--F
GREGORY
e
H
525
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Construct a missing link of sidewalk (approximately 350') on
Walnut St. between 3rd Ave. S and 4t" Ave. S (ranked #3 in Short Walkway Project list in 2015
Transportation Plan).
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: To provide a safe and desirable walking route.
SCHEDULE: Engineering & Construction scheduled for 2021 (unsecured funding).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$10,000
Construction
$95,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$105,000
all or part of this project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts
99
Packet Pg. 182
6.A.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: 216th St. SW Walkway from ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $157,000
Hwy. 99 to 72nd Ave. W
21400 �
JJ
7200 B&M
PARK & RIDE CONS
E ar-
MAN J
w 21410 21408 0.
� o � 21401 �
21412 v
M1 2140
U v
W
214G7
� 507
�
w � W /
21511 j
`
{
M DONAL6'
IL y
21431 r
p I N
21521
rn
Ilk
N
0
M STEVEN
A
21500
COURT
AEGIS 21558 `
VALUE
21527
VILLAGE
21674
ST SW ��
216TJ1
120
:VEN5
tILION
21600 { 21619
KRUGER *Aq
CLINIC , �11
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install 150' sidewalk on north side of 216th St. SW from Hwy. 99 to
72nd Ave. W (completing a missing link on north side of stretch). This project ranked #4 in the
Short Walkway List (from 2015 Transportation Plan).
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: To provide a safe and desirable walking route.
SCHEDULE: Engineering & Construction scheduled for 2021 (unsecured funding).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$30,000
Construction
$127,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$157,000
* all or part of this project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts
a
100
Packet Pg. 183
6.A.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: 238th St. SW Walkway from ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $491,000
Hwy. 99 to SR-104
i
1
L
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Ranked #12 in Long Walkway list from 2015
Transportation Plan. Install 5' sidewalk on the north side of 238th St. SW.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve pedestrian safety along that stretch
and creating safe pedestrian connection between Hwy. 99 and 76th Ave. W.
SCHEDULE: The design phase was completed in early 2017. The project was
advertised in May 2017 but the lowest bid was rejected since it was over budget.
The project will be re -advertised in early 2018. A TIB grant was secured to fund
the design and construction phases.
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
Construction
$370,977
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$370,977
* all or part of this project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts.
a
101
Packet Pg. 184
6.A.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Elm Way Walkway from ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $789,000
8t" Ave. S to 9t" Ave. S
4
�^
I
r.
1
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk along Elm Way from 8t" Ave. S to 9t" Ave. S. This
project ranked #6 in the Short Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: This project would improve pedestrian safety.
SCHEDULE: 2021-2022 (funding unsecured).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$156,000
Construction
$633,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$156,000
$633,000
102
a
Packet Pg. 185
6.A.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Maplewood Dr. Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,591,000
from Main St. to 2001h St. SW
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Construct sidewalk on Maplewood Dr. from Main St. to 200th St.
SW (- 2,700'). A sidewalk currently exists on 200th St. SW from Main St. to 76th Ave. W,
adjacent to Maplewood Elementary School (rated #22 in the Long Walkway list of the 2015
Transportation Plan).
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Create pedestrian connection between Maplewood
Elementary School on 200th St. SW and Main St., by encouraging kids to use non -motorized
transportation to walk to / from school.
SCHEDULE: Engineering scheduled for 2021 and construction in 2022 / 2023 (funding
unsecured).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Planning/Study
Engineering &
$230,000
Administration
Construction
$681,000
$680,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$230,000
$681,000
$680,000
* all or part of this project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts.
ti
0
N
O
d
a�
a
0
IL
U.
T
a
c
m
E
z
M
Q
103
Packet Pg. 186
6.A.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Dayton St Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $250,000
between 3R1 Ave. S and 9t" Ave. S
.K
uysr �° a
ay T F
�MFS St M�
51 1� i
' - -
sue., L
---------------------
o- MAIM Si
-----------------
I
k A r._ii . ��
, ���
a _�i�*
IPSM
1
iil���1
I
AUXRSr--
=WAURMS�
■jjII ll��-y {�I
WALNUT SI
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Construct a missing link of sidewalk Dayton St. between 7tn
Ave. S and 8t" Ave. S and additional sidewalk improvements along the rest of the stretch
(ranked #2 in Short Walkway Project list in 2015 Transportation Plan).
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: To provide a safe and desirable walking route.
SCHEDULE: Engineering & Construction scheduled for 2018 and 2019. A TIB grant was
secured for this project in 2016.
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT
COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$27,500
Construction
$200,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$27,500
$200,000
" all or part of this project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts.
0
N
O
a�
a
a
E
0
U
a
U_
U
H
H
Q
c
m
E
t
M
Q
104
Packet Pg. 187
6.A.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: 951h PI. W Walkway from ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $550,000
224th ST. SW to 220th St. SW
F
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk along 95th PI. W from 224th ST. SW to
220th ST. SW, with curb and gutter. This project ranked #9 in the Long Walkway
List of the 2015 Transportation Plan.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This project would improve pedestrian safety.
SCHEDULE: Engineering scheduled for 2021 and construction in 2022 (funding
unsecured).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$105,000
Construction
$445,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$105,000
$445,000
105
Packet Pg. 188
6.A.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Minor Sidewalk Program ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: varies
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Complete missing sidewalk along short segments throughout the
City.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve pedestrian safety.
SCHEDULE: 2018
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration &
ROW
$10,000
Construction
$90,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$100,000
106
Packet Pg. 189
6.A.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Railroad Ave. Sidewalk from ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $862,000
Dayton St. to SR-104
bt.
4� fi
�tio-P W NAYTON 5T
P❑
c'
r�
j
a
? Fo
�ONn.
ea a
--^ DAYTON ST
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install new and wider sidewalk along Railroad St. from
Dayton St. to SR-104.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve non -motorized transportation safety along
Railroad St. from Dayton St. to SR-104, key stretch since connects to various destination
points such as Senior Center, Port of Edmonds, Downtown Edmonds... .
SCHEDULE: All Phases are scheduled in 2021 and 2022 (unsecured funding for all
phases). A TAP grant application was submitted in September '17 to fund the design and
construction phases (13.5% local match required). The ROW phase will be 100% funded by
the City.
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration &
ROW
$160,000
Construction
$702,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$160,000
$702,000
107
0
N
0
a�
r
a�
a
0
U
IL
LL
U
Q
r
c
E
a
Packet Pg. 190
6.A.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Hwy. 99 @ SR-104 ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $700,000
Multi -Use path improvements
s� tia 1 jl
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install new non -motorized asphalt path along SR-104 from
SR-104 @ 240t" St. SW to Hwy. 99 @ 244t" St. SW.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve non -motorized transportation conditions along
the SR-104 / Hwy. 99 Corridors since this path is currently not easily accessible due to
significant uprooting.
SCHEDULE: All Phases are scheduled in 2021 and 2022 (unsecured funding for all
phases). A TAP grant application was submitted in September '17 to fund the design and
construction phases (13.5% local match is required). The ROW phase will be 100% funded
by the City.
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration &
ROW
$145,000
Construction
$555,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$145,000
$555,000
a
108
Packet Pg. 191
6.A.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: SR-104 @ 76th Ave. W non- I ESTIMATED PROJECT COST:
motorized transportation safety improvements $1,2100,000
I
�49 kd,,AGN OS WA, aFFRA PIP i�
LAKE UtLINGER WAY T1E)PAONas WAV
.. _%
.2111 751 sw i
242Nb PL SW
I _LL I `-I� ■ `1�
r � �
LAKL UAL1.INGER WAY
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Extend bike lanes within proximity of the intersection in
northbound and southbound directions. Install APS on all corners and new ADA curb ramps.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve non -motorized transportation safety along this
section of the Interurban Trail.
SCHEDULE: All Phases are scheduled in 2021 and 2022 (unsecured funding for all
phases). A TAP grant application was submitted in September'17 to fund the design and
construction phases. The City of Shoreline would fund the local match. The ROW phase will
be 100% funded by the City.
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
1 2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration &
ROW
$224,000
Construction
$986,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$224,000
$986,000
a
109
Packet Pg. 192
6.A.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: 191th St. SW Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $630,000
from 80th Ave. W to 76th Ave. W
z
a
i r
192ND PL 5W
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk along 191th St. SW from 80th Ave. W to 76th Ave.,
with curb and gutter. This project ranked #8 in Long Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation
Plan.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This project would improve pedestrian safety.
SCHEDULE: 2024-2038
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024-2038
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$90,000
Construction
$540,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$630,000
a
110
Packet Pg. 193
6.A.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: 10411 Ave. W Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $990,000
from 238th St. SW to 106th Ave. W
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk along 104th Ave. W from 238th ST. SW to 106th
Ave. W, with curb and gutter. This project ranked #10 in the Long Walkway List of the 2015
Transportation Plan.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This project would improve pedestrian safety.
SCHEDULE: 2024-2038
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024-2038
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$150,000
Construction
$840,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$990,000
111
Packet Pg. 194
6.A.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: 80th Ave. W Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $315,000
from 218th St. SW to 220th St. SW
n
STEVE
Golden
,
HEAL
Leaves
i
EVENS
A K
—
LEGEND
WES1
x
ESTATES
ISLE
-
'
J
a
218TH ST SW
781 r
r
L
-
219TH ST SW
r m
M1
-
or
Iti -
--- -----_228TH ST SW
—-------�T---------
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk along 80th Ave. W from 218th ST. SW to 220th ST.
SW, with curb and gutter. This project ranked #7 in the Short Walkway List of the 2015
Transportation Plan.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This project would improve pedestrian safety.
SCHEDULE: 2024-2038
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024-2038
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$55,000
Construction
$260,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$315,000
"�a
ti
0
N
O
T
d
A)
0.
E
0
a
IL
c�
T
F-
a
c
as
E
a
Packet Pg. 195
6.A.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: 84th Ave. W Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $315,000
from 188th St. SW to 186th St. SW
r `T r
5■■
i i
.�
44 T'■
F U ti
ri
186TH ST W
m
w
i-�
--. r
■
■
18 TH 5 5W
■
1
L ■
-
��' - ■��
188TH 5T SW
LE
r7
■
L
1 �
�
WI
1
r
L
r
J
r
r
SFAMF W
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk along 84th Ave. W from 188th St. SW to 186th St.
SW., with curb and gutter. This project ranked #5 in Short Walkway List of the 2015
Transportation Plan.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This project would improve pedestrian safety.
SCHEDULE: 2024-2038
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024-2038
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$60,000
Construction
$255,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$315,000
113
0
N
0
m
r
m
a
E
0
U
a
LL
U
a
r
E
Q
a
Packet Pg. 196
6.A.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: 2361h St. SW Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $765,000
from Hwy 99 to 76th Ave. W
rM bI III -.P%
PARK
& RIDE
236TH ST SIN_
23601
23603 SAFE'
23605 L K.
23607 NON
0
W
Q
X Id
10-
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk along 236th St. SW from Hwy 99 to 76th Ave. W.
This project ranked #11 in Long Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This project would improve pedestrian safety.
SCHEDULE: 2024-2038
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024-2038
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$115,000
Construction
$650,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$765,000
114
Packet Pg. 197
6.A.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: 2381h St. SW Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,170,000
from Hwy 99 to 76th Ave. W
� PARK �•nrIRL
NA LN EOMOHos BALL
APTS
' • 1 � � � � I r • w
NORTH m
CH RIST LH THE RAN CHURCH Ov
N
PARK R ~ �+
& RIDE
OFFICE
2 TH T
23667 , I
r 23663 SAFEWAY �
23606 N4N L KJIHG R '
2367667 SUNSET
L • . 239 O
P '•n•1L LO•n:
Q , BROOK
R AURORA rotas
- ` S MARKETPLACE
T 1�
H FA MILV PA NCAKE '
r V �7-77„ -
238TH 5T 5W
■ 1 `
L821
seouL PLAZA _ 1
' MEN-
23627TRAVEL LOO EEST. FRANC-M IHHBA TA CO TIM MOTEL�WHSE�•� 1:11 RIl RIl II F 1■ ■ ■
IN
0
E
:yA
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk along 238th St. SW from Hwy. 99 to 76th Ave. W
This project ranked #12 in Long Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This project would improve pedestrian safety.
SCHEDULE: 2024-2038
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024-2038
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$175,000
Construction
$995,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$1,170,000
a
115
Packet Pg. 198
6.A.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: 801h Ave. W / 180th St. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,350,000
SW Walkway from 188th St. SW to OVD
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk along 80th Ave. W from 188th St. SW to OVD. This
project ranked #13 in Long Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This project would improve pedestrian safety.
SCHEDULE: 2024-2038
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024-2038
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$270,000
Construction
$1,080,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$1,350,000
a
116
Packet Pg. 199
6.A.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: 189th PI. SW Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $585,000
from 80th Ave. W to 76th Ave. W
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk along 189th PI. SW from 80th Ave. W to 76th Ave.
W. This project ranked #14 in Long Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This project would improve pedestrian safety.
SCHEDULE: 2024-2038
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024-2038
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$115,000
Construction
$470,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$585,000
a
117
Packet Pg. 200
6.A.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Ferry Storage ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $357,000
Improvements from Pine St. Dayton St.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Modify existing lane channelization on SR104 to add vehicle
storage for ferry users.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Reduce conflicts between ferry storage and access to
local driveways.
SCHEDULE: 2021 (unsecured funding)
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$50,000
Construction
$307,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$357,000
a
118
Packet Pg. 201
CITY OF EDMONDS
6.A.a
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Edmonds Street Waterfront ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $29,000,000
Connector
FiA
77
i
A"
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This project builds a grade -separated overcrossing over the railroad
tracks as an extension of Edmonds Street connecting to Brackett's Landing north park (project
identified in Edmonds Waterfront Alternatives Access Study completed in 2016).
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Provide access for emergency vehicles, pedestrians, and
bicycles. The overpass could be utilized to offload passenger vehicles from a ferry during an
extended closure of the railroad track crossings.
SCHEDULE: 2018-2038. A State Appropriation for $700,000 was secured in 2017. Community
Transit, Sound Transit, BNSF, and the Port of Edmonds are contributed $140,000 to get this projec
started (Unsecured funding for Design and Construction Phases).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024-203E
Planning/Study
$785,000
$530,000
Engineering &
$1,000,000
$1,000,000
Administration
Right of Way /
$1,000,000
$1,000,000
Environment
Mitigation
Construction
$12,000,000
$11,000,00
TOTAL
$785,000
$530,000
$2,000,00
$2,000,000
$12,000,000
$11,000,00
a
119
Packet Pg. 202
6.A.b
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
2018-2023
op .. EDP
�sr
1!0
Eo
DRAFT
Q
Packet Pg. 203
6.A.b
c
ca
a
c
m
E
m
O
L
Q
E
Q
V
a.
d
u
m
U-
.Q
V
M
N
O
N
Q
Packet Pg. 204
6.A.b
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (2017-2023)
Table of Contents
GENERAL
016
Building
Maintenance
Public Works
7
112
Transportation
Public Works
9
125
Capital
Projects Fund
Parks & Recreation/
Public Works
12
126
Special Capital /
Parks Acquisition
Parks & Recreation/
Public Works
14
129
Special Projects
Parks & Recreation
16
132
Parks Construction
Grant Funding)
Parks & Recreation
17
421
Water Projects
Public Works
19
422
Storm Projects
Public Works
20
423
Sewer Projects
Public Works
22
423.76
Waste Water
Treatment Plant
Public Works
24
PARKS — PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS
Capital
Parks & Recreation/
125
Projects Fund
Public Works
28
Special Capital /
Parks & Recreation/
126
Parks Acquisition
Public Works
52
Parks Construction
132
(Grant Funding)
Parks & Recreation
57
Q
Packet Pg. 205
6.A.b
c
ca
a
c
m
E
m
O
L
Q
E
Q
V
a.
d
u
m
U-
.Q
V
M
N
O
N
Q
Packet Pg. 206
6.A.b
Cip
GENERAL
Q
Packet Pg. 207
6.A.b
c
ca
a
c
m
E
m
O
L
Q
E
Q
V
a.
d
u
m
U-
.Q
V
M
N
O
N
Q
Packet Pg. 208
6.A.b
CO
N
O
N
00
O
N
O
N
U
N
.O
a`
C
En
O
a
U)
c
01
N
O
Q
m
a
m
U
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O
(y
N
O 0
O O
EA 000000000000000000000000000000000
O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
LO O
O LO
fA 6900690000000000
O O
O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O
O
OLO
O
LO LO
LO O
LO UO
O UO
O O
UO 000
m Un
ON
V)lO
00
m 0
mlO
0 LO
N LO
LON
00
O
UO UO
O O
LO CDlO
lOO
w N
NN
W
DNN
UO
MN
v)N
f--�
V
UON
f--
V
f--
0
Nm
NLO7
(h c0
000
OV3(h
UOO
U')0
p
Hta
Vf 64
V)
04 64
fH
6H V)
EA
6 S
f
V) 61)EA
61)
Cq 61)
'ITEf3
61) Ef3
Cq E!>
EA V93
V93 Ef3
U9.64
fA
fH 64
04 64
64
613,61)
61)E!>
61)
E!> E!>
64
O
N
O O
O
O O
O O
O
O O
O
O
O O
O C,
C,O
O
0
O O
O O
O
O
O O
O O
O O
O O
000
O
O O
O
O
O
O
O O
O O
0000
O O
L O O
O
O
0
O
M
LO LO
O
OO
LO UO
OLOO
O
V)V)O
OLON
LO
LO
UO
N
CDfA
613 64
N
7 Li)
fA fA
64 61)
N
f!>
N
6,3j 61),ffi
V)H>
H>
H>
N HJ
H>
64 64
09)
6%
N
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
LO
0
O
LO
LO
LO
U')
LO
to
O
UO
N
LO
O
fA
64
fA
ff3
fA
N
EJ>
O
N
d>
64
fA
N
00
O
p
O
O O
O
0 0
0
0 0
0 0
00
0 0
O
O
O
O
O O
O
O
O
00
O O
O
O
o
p
O
O
O O
O O
O
O
O O
O O
O
0
O O
0 0
O O
0 O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O O
O O
O
O
O
O
O
O
LOO
O
N
LO
O 6
U)000
00
V) LO
UOO
UOO
O
LO
O
000
CD
U)0
64 N
fA
(0
fA
vs
00
fA
M 61)
Q4
H>
U')
fA V>
(O
f!3
LO
ff3 fA
N f�
N fi?
Ef3 0
N LO
H> V>
fA
7
64
O
N
fA
UO 0
fA Q4
M
6q
Hj
0
64
N
v3
O
00
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
0
O
O
00
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
LO
O
O
O
O
O
O
0
0
O
LO
LO
LO
LO
O
to
O
N
O
O
O
LO
N
O
(fl
61)
61)
61)
N
ff)
61)N
Ef3
fA
Co
V3
(0
V3
N
V3
fA
N
0000
0
0
0 0
0 0
O
L O
0
O
lA
O N
O Un
O
N
Lf'i
W ,
UO H>
N
fA
CD
N
C)fA
H>
H>
V>
O
O
O
00000
0
00
O
O
O
O
O
O
00000
O O
O O
O
O
O
00
O O
00
LO
LO
O
to O
to to
O
O
LO LO
O
N
64
fA
0
EA N
61)
CO
Q4 Ef3
Ef3
V
K3
Cl) 64
64
N
(�
0)
r- j 0
O
O
O
O O
O
O
O
O
O
LO
O O
O
O
N
O
N N
V3
N
f!3
Q3,
Un
Ef3 613
M
fA
_O
fA
W
64
a
W
U
C
N
E
V
C
U
CD
E
Cl
C
0
C
N
_
Ca
E
l0
Cl
y
E
O
O
E
C
N
�
C
O
O
0)
-
C
N
O u)
N
0) l6
C
0)
C (0
C
r
U
@CL
LL
o
U)
CL
0
N
0
C
.0
O`
.@
C
C
N
O
E
O
V
N
0) 0>
E
0)
0)
a
a>
C
C
C
N
C
c
O N
O
m a
E a'
01 O
C
V@
U6 O
c 'O
7 Cr
L
0)
C
l6
U
C
C
C
—
@a
a)
4E)LL
0
m y(7
0x��
y
f0�
W
E m
`�
o U)
U
m@
m
a
s0
o
rcY
_ma)
a)
w
U
'90
0
m O
a16
a
a
'J rn
O O
Co
(6
°
N U
E 5
C
N N@
LL
a' Y
C U
c00 C
C
cy0 E
0)
O rn
m a'
V
C
li
O
O
O
E Q
@
0 7
F>
0
0
0 7
N
C
O
O N
O
V
L
C
0 C
U C
¢-N
Cl
D O'
0)
W
Ln
C
W x
Co X
W W
O X
J W
i
Co 1:0
t rn
O O
ILLUUUW
M-
0
0'
0 (�
00 N
N N
•@
N
c 0
ELL
C -O
>
C
�Q�
O N
N N
N N
N N
N N
N N
N N
N N
N N
N N
Cr,_O
�a�U
p
@U
0)"O�
coo
U
L6a�jU2UUW
OUW
Q
E C
C C
C C
C C
C C
C C
C C
C C
C C
C C
y U:
C—
'0
2 0
l0
a'
U`
U
W j
C C
0)
(�
O
N
O
N
c
>
o ¢
¢
-0 0
m'm'o
0
o a�
xt
� xt
�* �*
� �
xt �
it
r
ODUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUm
l0 .-
U �i
W W
O�
a x
7i
W m
OLL
x
W
U)
a as
W
C
C C
C C
C C
C C
c
U
` C
C C
C C
C C
C C
C C
C C
C C
C C
C C
C
J
LL
Y Y
_%
p
a O
p 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
W
O
E
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O p=_______----
01 N
N 01
01 01
01 01
(0 f0
m U6
f0 f0
- -
U
w
0
0 0
0) 0)
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 �xxxxxxxxxxx=aa000�
c(n
„@,
ninininininininin
0 0
0 0
0 0
0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0
E
UUU
t 0
-
C
C C
C C
C C
C C
C C
C C
C C
C C
C C
C N
._ ._
._ ._
._ ._
._ ._
._ ._
._ r'
z=
V) V)
"-
y
y
d
¢¢¢¢¢¢¢¢¢¢¢¢¢¢¢¢¢¢¢¢¢
U
U U
U U
U U
U U
U U
U U
U U
W W
W U
LL LL
LL LL
LL LL
LL LL
LL LL
LL
Q
Packet Pg. 209
6.A.b
O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O
O
O O
O O
O
O O
O
O
00
f
OV>00000(AO
0
00000
O
0000000
O O
O O
H
O C
oo
O
oa0000a
OOOOOOH>(AEs>
0LO
LO
0
U.)OLO
OLO
LO LO
LO LO
U.)LOO
LO
000�
LO
LO
N
64
(O
64
EH
LO
Cl) fA
O LO
EH EH
M
EH
6q 69
N (D
EH 69
OD 0)
69 V3,
EA
N
fA
f-
69
O
M Ln
69 69
M
EA 69
00
69
6s
61)
0
0
0
0
0
C
0
o
0
O
Ln
o
LO
LO
V3
V3
H>
69
H3
0
000
0
0
00
0000
0
0
000
000
O
O
o
o
00
00
0000
0000
Ln
Ln
Ln 0
U-)
U')
Ln 0
LO o
Ln
bp���6q
V3
Z9
ZN9
fA SEA
H>
00
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
00
00
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
0
0
0
C
O
O
O
O
66
O
O
O
0
0
LO
LO
LO
0
LO
LO
6q
�
V3
M
69
69
-
O
fA
H3
6q
H>
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
LO
O
O
LO
0
"q
V>
M
4>
N
V>
M
fA
00
Cl O
O
O
O
O
0
O
LO O
LO
LO
O
N� (»
69
�
69
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
6s
OD
69
N
ff>
p-
(A
O
O
O
00
000
000
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
00
O
O
0690
O
O
000
Ci
Ci Ci
O
O
0
0
O
LO
O
O
O O
LO
V>
N
V>
V3
V)
N
fA
69
N
V3
M
fA
EA EH
ER
i
C
CL
N
N
m
Co
m
�
�
m
C
a)
c
E
O
a)
0
E
C
U
N N
UL E
o
o m
_
(-°
(_U6
U�
Cy
Co
U
C,
C
cc
to `
.@
y
-O U
U
N
U
m
y
C
a)
c
a) l
a)
0)
�)
c
U
a)
cl
a)
E
c
O
c f0
@
.+
N
(0) 0
N LL'
4
y
Err.
c
c
(D
U
C
0 '(p
Q'
-
U
c
y `O"
C
0
Y
N
=0
0
LL'
c
l6 l6
E C
E
m O
(n
03
() M
N
O
N N
C
m
03
"0
0
0 m
(7
O
Q O
d'
V N
C)
m
a) 06
U)
a) od
• C
E O
C
Q
0 O
0
N 7
X 0
y
l6 l6
l6
C
Q'
C
A L
O
o i.
C
LL
m
m
m
Cl
°� m
m m
m
m
o
C
H
>
Co
$
m -o
m
�
a
f0
0
m
3
o°'
-
o
LL
U a)
m
E
(n
(ca
l6
U m
lc6
m
LL
>
O
>
C 0
> >
0 0
>
0
;
N
o a)°o'm
O N
N (n
°°
-_��
(..)
�Lu
a N
a)
c
c
�_
U
U
p
c a'
(6 N
y
a
C
a)
04it LU
m��U
_7
LLUUUU
C�
O
:t2
�
Cl-(
LL
W
(
W
O i
U2
N 0
O
C)
C
C-
N-
N O
V) m
m m
m m
m rn
l6
�O!�O!
m �C
�C U
c
O
y
Y Y
Y
C
c
0
0 c
M Y-
(6 O
m l6
-p
l6 l6
'0 '0
l6 l6
'0 '0
'O m
W W
W a)
w
c M
w
N
w
W
w w
W W
O O
O
O m
m
Na(na3:
O
O O
O O
OLL
E E
���»»UU
> >
>
>
(n
(n �
-0
-0 -0
-0 -0
.
7a=��
�
a
`o
aaaaa16ia16ia16ia16iaia`6iN>>>,wy������>>>aciaci
1
) m
m
JJJ�221
1 ����U�aaaaa0-0-0-
cn
8
O
LO
ri
O
O
Ln
LO
e>
00000
000
00
o v>
Ln
O o
o00
o
(n w
64
u> v>
000
C
�
_O N
O
N
�Q4
00000
000
00
O v>
O
O O
OOo
o
w w
u>
v> v>
N64
ui
000
000
O
fA Nam-
fA
N
000000000
O O
O V>
O
O O
O O
O O
O O
w w
Ef>
64 6G,
M
O O
O O
N
N
Et>
O O
cf>6C4
O O
(�> N
W9.
00000
000
00
O V>O
L O
O
O O
O
O
ww
ef)
64 EA
O
N
N
Ef>
O (C,4
to V3
O
fH
00
000000
O O
0 V>
O
O 0
d> E!>
H>
fn 63
O
C
M
H>
O
N
O c
CO
N
00
000
00
O V>
O
O
O
Lo U'>
Ei>
K> Ef>
W
r-
V>
Cl)
O
N
�
0000
000000
0�
0 0
Lo 0�
0
� 64
~
O
66
N
O
O
H>
N
64
M
V3 V>
y m
a0
M
CD�
O
a)a
�
c
C O
"O
N
O
L '@
N
LL o
p
Co (D
LO
a
N
N
Cr,
w
V%
to
O
U
C
Fo
C
@U
(COS
>>
ll
C
7LLLL
m o�
._
cc
m
a)
U
LL~~
ow-'-
N N
W LL
s
(co
aa))ww
c
E2
m
y
a
v�
Co
m
i7d'd'
C
N
O
E(�
y
E E
E'v
c)
Oo
- 0
M(L
v
�U
y c°
°
o
o
LL
LL U
E
c c
cLLwU
O
EU
W
m
W
O O
•>•>•>
0'0
d+-o>>t5
N y
N y
C
c
m���
U
y>O
y
'Op
LL
0�+0
E=.a)
r
In
0 0
0 CQC-aSUUUx
Ir(n�
O
O
00
L
N
b9
� = Q
>
>
r M 4)
C
C
y 7
�aV
ao V
�
m
a a
c
4 N +W
Q
F
F F
W
Packet Pg. O
6.A.b
N
N
N
0
N
N
O
N
O
N
N
n
N N
W
LL
U
n w
o
OOOOOOOoo
fA0
O
00
O O
00
O O
00
O O
0000oo
000000'0t
O O
O O
O O
to E9
V
N
n
M
to
�o cc
0) n
N 6
E9
Mcc
0 0)
O)0p
MEA
Occ
W O
6c4
fA EA
NNOvNaor
M«
MNM�
N M
M EA
O T
c'J���
M
0 M«
V MO
to
�
M
O
O
O
O
O
M
O
O
O
O
O
O
�3
O
O
O
i 0
M
i0
O O
O O
O O
i 0 0
O) V
n N
O O
O O
O O
n N
M M
W O)
O
O
O
0
O
i0
O
O
O
�
n
e»
O
O
O
ON(GO«V
O
M
O O
O O
O O
n n
n
O O
O O
O O
orn
roo
O O
O O
O O
NO
MaD
Mo�n�v�ro
O O
O O
O O
V
O<ON
O O
O O
O O
OW
M(O
W
(O
V
h
O
O
O
O
O
N
O O
O O
O O
MOON
�2
v> vs
O O
O O
O O
M
F» vs
O O
O O
O O
V N
�R
F» vs
O O
O O
O O
O O
M
F»
O O
O O
O O
i0 0
N
vs
O
O
O
0
�2
F»
O
O
M
O O
O O
W 7
O
O
N
LH
M
M O
n v
V �
aD O
N N
X X
X X
X X
X X
X X
X X
X X
X
E
E
d
m
c
E
E
d
>
O
ig
O
V O>
E
E
d
E
a ha
E
o
>«
2EEEEZcEEUo
C C
C c
C
C C n
o
6
y
12
E >
> 'o>
E2
E >
> f0 O)
C
E
C O
O O
O Y
y p
p E,
E3E
6EEEE-2EE�
3
oN a
d
N C
p
C C
o o
C
o m
E
E
O
`
`
Qi >
C �'
o o
o fn
o
O~
E T
C o
Q
N
2 L'
E L
U y
N>
O—
m
r
3
L
m
y
N 2
N In
o d
i2
d0
d---Eo
jai-ai3aU
Q>>u)
E��>�sminms_vlQ>c
n
L
L
a
U Oul
r
s
3 3
N
3��
t p O)
N
N N
N N
W N
O 3
nn
.
dc9���
6)
m
@
�
�
av)
min
mm
o
NN45
x IN
5
3
2K
2K
N
NNn2
w m
N2222mmmtnUN
00000000000m�n00000000000000
O O
O
O O
O O
O O
O N
(D 0
0 0
O
0
0 0
0 O
ON
O
N
NM V3
l��OO
EA
00)
M
W OHO
MM
fA
NnO
00
to
M
i00
M to
W pi
aD
� to
fA
«!�
ON
� to
M
O
N
M
N000
<O
to
co
� to
fA
(O
E9
fA
O
O
O
O
O
W
�3
O
O
O
O
O
W
N
O O
O O
0 0
00
no
N
O
O
O
N
w
N
O
O
O
W
N
N
O
O
O
O
o
0
O
O
M«
M
0
O
O
W
O
O
O
N
v
O
O
0
N
ow�no
O O
O O
0 0
(ONO
O
O
0
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
M
O O
O O
O O
0 0
O
O
O
Nn
O
O
O
O
O
O
t0
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
i0
O
O
O
O
O O
O O
O O
V NO
O
O
O
O
O
N
N
O
O
O
N
O
O
O
O
N
N
(O
O
l0
O
l0
O
O
O
NM
O
V t 0
N W
E9V
ap
o
.
N
M
O
I
O
O
N
N
N
N O
n o
1 i O
V O
� N
aD
V
N
O
O
M
N
�
O o]
O W
N M
N
X X
X X
X X
X X
X X
X X
X
X X
X
X X
X X
X
a
E
�
E
E
d
>
w>
�E
m
C
>
@
�
C
C
2>
>
>
Y
m
o
d
0
mOn(3n'o
Q
>
N
L
y�LO
> `
Ofn
(n fOaYn
C
E
E
@
Eg
N
>
EO
«ON«N
3 a
�NNN
W UJ�O)t
o>
Np
O >>
L
Qj
U
m
c
N
o L
O�
m
O
f0
3 3"
E o
3
o f0
3 g
« S
3
=
Q
N L
N Q
o
U ^..
L M
p
5
a>
m>>
y
fn
m O
Gi V=
o
O
C T
�; O)
0
E
N N
0
y
-p
ott
E
ostvl¢
°o
yN
> m
Ea
OZ
i�c`o
O
«0o
E
' ««
NaDN
y
d"
L N«
>
O
l0 N
>
O
o,g
my3
m c
s oEEEEE
ow�M�
N
En
N'
'O
EMmE16L
Y
>
cQ
E-Qo2EN«
OMym3da`�Q
°c'
m
mM
p'on
aEi O
o
o o
o E
9 E3
o
S
E
E'-h
1:
L
E
33
m
3 3
3-
°
3 o
3 3
0 E
0 o
o o
m'o
0
E
3 L
mul
3
n=—
E m«
d
>
nm<n
vo<n�<o
maw
p
o'
-2 o3:,v
n
@E�
m
m
^' �tttaa
E)
ct_t'o�
m EUa(L
000inUN
OMMMM
V
O�O
f00
M._
E
N N❑
��
5
O tO
d'd'
NOY
mNNNNOp
W NN3NNU
W
�OQQrn2�2mfndQfL
N
N
O
W
9
Packet Pg. 211
6.A.b
M
a
N
A
a
N
a
G
F
N
�0
n o
_N
0
0
O
N
N O
t0 O
�
O
O
N
N
V O
n o
n N
V
�
O
0
O
N
O o
O) O
O
O
Of
n O
7 O
N O
V M
O
O
O
O
Co
m0
W O
7 W
0
O
O
00
0 0
00
0
O
0
01
O O
O O
O) V
O O
O O
NM
O
O
c0�c0
O
M O
ap N
O) W
V �
O N
O c O
V W
aD O
C D O
aD OaDNOnOM000
n O
c O M
O N
O n
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
0
O O O
O O O
OOO
r A
�Nvn
W W
N
d3
V M�c0
d3
c0 c2-o
63 M
-NNO)ONOo
l0
c0
n
M
O)o
M W M
O V
M W
N
c0
O
M
d3 Yi
�
N
d3 Yi
N
Y3 Yi
N
Y3 Yi
N
Y3 Yi
Y3
d3 N M
N N
d3
63 d3
63
63 d3
d3
d3 63
111
0
0
0
0
m aEi
m m
c
o
c rn
0 0?
o
E L
O O
O Q
O
m m
o
0
0 =o,
d o
a«
o 0
0
0 o
a a`
C m
o n
U U
m
U
g
!n
o 0
0 0«
u�{
m
m
D-
o c
U o
c c
m r
y
y
y
y=
m
o N
M N
aci
E E
m m
E c
c
E
E O
O O`
>O
O
@
22mmLCLS�i'�°mmmn
NLL
O,C
mm>>.u)
�
cYa��u)
a. LL
�
N N
N
c d
3 <6
N <>6
fn a
E
M
N >
�i>
E E
h m
E o
E
m> m
N
d NNnN(nU
co
m m
mL
NQ
m
O>
C E>>
°D
co
fl
LL o
u
oW
m
N
N l6
C«Q
Q
Q c�ro
d R
to
CiUd
m C«
I` _
E
a
au)
a
N
V
C C
Q Q
Q O
N
0 N
L L
t0 i0
n n
L
t0 O
n y
Sj O
m
L ip
W M
M N
c0 W
M M<
N N
Q Q
Q
Q Q
"O
J O
Q
F U
w
W N
St
c0`p m
C
NNaN�
c N
w
w'c
w U
N w
,�OF
w wNc0
N NNN
c0 Nc0
c0a
N N
C
c m
acO
c N
�
cy
m—
LL LL
� LL
c
p
c
LL LL
LL
LT
U o
E E
m m
c E
o m
E d
E E
E-
E`
E-
E
c d
E E
d d
E E
E E
m m
m
E E
m m
d m
E E
m m
c c
o o
m ..
c E u
o m n
ami
t
�
C
C U
d d�
d
3
3
d n
d d
a 2
d n
d
io;oEEcEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEcccE
'd 'd
.d
'd
m
4'a
m o
m
d m
W W
o m
0K
K a
K¢
d
K¢
Z
K a
Z
K ad'Kd'K
d m
d m
d m
fr KU
o 0
UUKF
o m
v
Ii
r
V
n
N
n
Y
i
O
N
Ocli
N
0
0
N
N
O
O
O
g
u>
vi
N
N
O
O
O
N
O
O
c0'J
O
O
N
Y3
O
O
N
O
O
MM
O
N
O
O
N
000
N
n
Y)
W O
W O
Y)
c0
�
O
Y)
cOOc00
NONc00-
On
Y)
Wn
Y)
00
NO
c0 c0
Y)
d
O
0
N
aD00000cON
O�MNOOOONn
�MI�OOMO)�I�MNc01�0
7cOOV70
V
O V
c00
�
d)
OCO
V NfA�fAN
W nN0f0
V
G
N N
EAMN�
N
Y)
Y)�Yi
d3 N�tA�
W
fA
fA
E
3
CO
N
w
in
m
E
Z
m
c
d�
tN
>
EaE
d
o
a
mm3
2
2
ELL
�m>.LL4GLmOlmo01
>QOfLN�dN.>o•NEENdod0-:.
OcOtmnNm'.
@«S.
111--o-l-moo
NsEKNDC�Nmlmom0
w
2
\>N
Q
NUNmEdW
oY=O
I.
U)mA
I
F�
w
OW
0
o
0Coco
O
000
O O
O
00000
O O
O O
o
M
M o
d3
NrNWTN
d3 63
d3 63
d3
0
O
O
v
00
O
0
Y)Y3
O
0
00000000
O O
c 0 0
Y>n
O O
0 0
ino
Yi Y3
O O
0 0
Mo
Y3
O O
c 0 0
N
Yi
O O
O O
O O
O N
d3
O
O
O
O
d3
O O
O O
O O
N O
d3 63
O O
c 0 0
V O
c0 NNN
d3 63
O O
0 0
O O
d3 63
O O
0 c 0
IO N
O) M
d3
LLL
w
N
H
d
m
U
o
o d
m d
d
N
m
L
u)
£ V
E y
N d
O O
N
O E
V2N
L
y
E
U
`
rJ E
E E
-
E N
N
N
_
0 0
O
N N
9
L O'K
L 0
a
GO7
`
>i `
°' N
E
c H
0 H
0
lo
Q
N U
u C
u)u)
ai E
dmoN=�Q>
a;
Q
O
O
a a>>
m M>
>
N
(D O
N
V
N E
m>
M U
L>
M m
N
N
o`
J d
�inrnin
cL
«
> rn
Q oo
rnmrn
oom
m
> N
¢aJ
iq�N2o'�
n=
m==a
Q
10
Packet Pg. 2
6.A.b
0
0
CR
O
0
0
o
I
0
0
O
0
0
o
N
0
0
0
O
N
fA
O O
O O
0 0
V O
<O N
to E9�E9�E9�
O W
O (O
o v
W h
M cps
to
O 0
O O
o 0
W O
OaD
to
0
O
0
N
to
O O
O O
0 0
O) O
M O
�E9
to
O O
O O
0 0
W O
70)70aD
V3 MtA
O O
O O
0 0
N CO
MtA
O O
O O
0 0
fG O
W
E9
O
O
0
O
O
N
E9
O O
O O
O O
N iOM
O O
O O
O O
OIL
f9 fA
O
O
O
f9
O
O
N
t0
f9
O
O
O
O
f9
O O
O O
O O
N1�
f9 fA
O O
O O
O O
W O)N
fA
O O
O O
O V
W
f9 fA
O O
O O
O 0
V i0
f9
O O
O O
0 0
O)O
f9 N
N
a�
m
m
m
IL
$°�>
o
m
y o
E
'3
o
L
olpp
y
m
m
a>
l
=O
aEi E>
> m
o>
O O
"
m m
ry 0
N
E L
d
E
D
O
Q N
o
N C
N 10
o
w
°
EE
E E
oa
w a
o
o
L
m
o
m
o
o 0
`000$Lrn(n
v
RL
o
c
4
i"saL
y m
o
m m
L
M w
o 3>
ti g
m
0
" y
d
m E
E N
N E
E
L o
ry
o
N
U
Z.
Z.
L
E w°
o
o 2
2->
E'?
o o
.� _
E
E
m
E o
o «.
E
min
o
moo:
moo:
�rNi�
o°"0
v
(nfn(nfn(nN
yy
No�ON>N
W
O)
(nu)LL
W
a
Q
11
Packet Pg. 3
6.A.b
C
R
En
O
i
a
U)
C
0
0
O
CL
l6
m
U
O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O
O O
O
M
O
O O
O f A
0 0
0 0
0 0
f A 0
0 f A
0 0
0 0
O
f A 0
0
NC
C C
C
C C
C C
C C
C
C
C C
C C
O
O
C
O
O
LO L0
�OOO
v0
OO
0000
O
O
ui)
l4 N
YO
a0
e3 e3
O
O
N
O
O
Me3
64
7
e3
N N��
L0 N
e3 e3
Ui)
U0n
r _W
e3
e3 e3
fA
N
fA
e3 to
e3
to
to
O
�
�
N
O
O
O O
O
O
O
O O
O
ay
N
�
Goa
V> O
0
N
Goa
O
N
0
0
0
0
O
O
O
O
O
O0
V>
V
Go)
O
M
e3
LO
N
0
0
0 0
0
0
0
0
O
o
O O
O
O
O
O
In
O
In O
m
In
In
L6
Go)
Go> O
Goal
Go>
Goal
NN
O
Goal
N
0
0
0
0
0
0
O
O
O
O
O
O
00
O
O
0
O
O
Go>
Go>
d3
0Go)
�
N
O
N
O O
O
O
O
O
00
00
O
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
O1
Goal
)O
�
Goal
Goal
Goal
�
� �
�
O
Goal
Goal
N
O
O O
O
00
O
O
O O
O
00
00
O
O
Goal GoalO
O
CD CD
O O
O
O
O
O
000
O O
O
Oo
O O
00
00
O
O
0 0
O
0
O O
o
661
61
L61
O
n v
God
N
fn
N
God
U0 7
C, God
7
Goal
U0 �
God
U 0
Goal
n
e3
0
0
rn
0
o
0
0
0 0
0 o
0
Goa
0
o
0
C)
0 0
C) o
0 0
Goa o
0
Goa
0
o
0
Go3
0
Co
0
0 00
0
m
0 0
0 ui
0
0
0
[
n N
N
O
O
CD
N
N
r E
Go)
Go)
�
Go3
�
Goal
Go)
N N
W
IL
LL
x
x
X.
0
C
oa
E
c
U
o
�
O
Y
O
"O
O
C
O
0
a)
rn
m
O
C
N
U)
C
��„
y
c
E
Y a)
w
3 w
.y.
E
E
o
aci
r
c
m
u O
U
a)
`
w
C T
w
E>
a) O
U
E
a)
c Ear
a)
> rn
C
IX o
CL
E 0
0
a
E
vo)
'�
>o
a
C
aEi m
E
a)
E 'o
L
E
a)
3
v
LU
a)
aLL
E m
m
o o
o
a
�'`a�
a>
°' E
Qo
o
a)
E Co
Q
m
rnm
`m
N
Z
_0 o
f a)
°�
c`o a
rn U
a `m
a
E
-0 °o
a
v m
N
v
�
O N
U
N a_
E
C
°) o
C7
`m r
d U
o
C O
m
0 a
m
m
d
>
f0 0
2
a7 m
a
C
C
W
Q
0
m
m
°� 3
a)
3 0
Y
Co
m
°
s
c
LL
O
ai w
Y
m m
aci
Im
c E
3
d cL-Op-Op
3 L°
j�
t
0aY(7
c a)
oa
c
a) a)
E
O
c
cYia
m w
voi
>
S2 o
m `m
m ao
ao c
m o
`m w
Eo w
m
CL
aamUUrn�U�����a<n<
.>
ao
CL
LUU>x0
0
CD
N
N
O
O
C
w
0
0
0
N
VD
0
O
0
M
VD
0
0
0
C)
O
n
0
0
0
rn
ao
w
0
0
0
n
w
0
rn
m
of
n
Vk
u
41
4 Q
O d
a E
N
s
a �
0 a
`f%
Packet Pg. 4
6.A.b
o O
0 0
(n n
O
N n
V) V)
O O
O O
C C
� O
m 61
CO V)
O O
O O
C C
O O
(f7 O
m O
V)
O O
O O
C C
L OO
m m
V3 V)
0
C
0
O O
O O
(n O
O O
O O
O M
7(n
O N
ON
N (n
(o V)
V)
V) V)
c
O
a
O
X
U
T
m
Y
_
E N
j
N
O E
N
d
v
d
a>
c E
N
L
m
cO p
m (6
0.O
O
C
o
N
N
C
N E
C O
C
m
Cm'Dv
m
-o
Z a
m a
E Co
m
y
m
m a
O C
(�
N 0
Co
w E
2 M
Y
N N-
m o
C
m a>U)
1 D0d�a
3
°'m
p
EL '_.
n LL
Y a
N@
a .O
(n j
,
za-
'C
"�O
a
't
m
c LL
E
0)0
E
Q
U)
=p
N
N
>�
a)>
m c
CU
O
f0¢¢?
(n am
>OU
....
N U
m
....
`-'
d
04
04 0
0 0
a
'm
-oaaa?a
-o-oa
C
C C
caaga
C
C
C
c c
7
c c
7 7
c
7
>>>
LL
LL LL
LL>
Y LL
> O)
LL c
LL
LL LL
LL LL
LL
m
c
aaa
oaam'aU)ioio(n(iio
O
O O
"' 0
0 0
0
0 0
0 0
0 0
C
E
E E
am E
E E
E
E E
E E
E E
0
0 o
u, o
0 0
o
a7 0
0 0
0 0
a
E
a a
E E
a a
E E
a a
E E
a
E
D a
E E
a a
E E
a a
E E
0)
N
E
m
y
3
N �
c E
(D
E a
d o6
(D
3
f] U
E
O
z a`
m 6
o H
O O m
O O O
M V O
N
O
N
V) V3 V)
OD O OOD
O O m
N O
N V O
N
O
N
V) V3 V)
O (n0
O O n
OD O a
C V O
N
O
N
OD
V) Vd V)
(0 O m
N CD (NO
a O O
O O O
N � o
O
N
V) Vd V)
No
O O Cl!
OD o N
Q� Cl) O
r � N
O
N
V) V3 V3
OOD o CC)
O oD
m o c0
o Co v v
O
N
V3 Vd V)
(OCD O O N
r O O V
n N N a
O £ N
N N
W
04
Cq
N
0
N
(a N
d O
V C
C Cc
!0 �
m U
t Co
H (0 0
� m �
i � N
c Cc m c
7 C_ N W
C C in O N
N C w N
m
a>i a°i o 0
�ma❑r-
VT
0
(D
m
r
O
O
M
Co
0
0
O
n
Q
13
Packet Pg. 5
6.A.b
00a)"
Co
M
N
OcO-
O
Ln N
00
V
Cl)
59
00
C"0
Co
V3
V-) V)
V►
O
N
O
O O
O
0000
W
O N
00
O
C
M
Co
m n
O
N
00
LO N
Vi
h
O
613
Et3
N
W
O
LOO
� O
N
N
O
O Cfl
n
N
00
E4
(fl N
U3 U)
CO
O
N
Z.
O
O O
O
M
O O
N
Cl)C0
O
00
N r
N
CO n
LO
O N
00
LO N
t0
N O
V3
C4 V)
00 N
O
N
L
w
O
O O
O
y
CO
V O
M
N n
C`M
N N
00
LO N
O
.0 O
L N
V3
V) V)
a
O
Co
CM0
O 'o
Mao
to
O
01
o)M
n
O
LO N
01
Ln
r
Vs
N
O
O O
O
Co
CO
O oc
M W
Co
Of
Co
CTI
4 N
CO
�
O
V3
f4 V3
yg
N
000
O
CD
Co
C
O M
M Cfl
t0
Of
a+
ti
£
00
64
CO N
63 64
n
O .E
N N
W
IL
LL
0
t5
m Q
L
0
o
o0
0
a
m m
y w
Y
cc
-
J
E
m
Co
0
W
(
Q
L N
m C
C
QC N
Z
o
o
L
U U
U
C
Cm
F
L6
a+
W
aZi 00)
00) d
Ch 0
a c
O
110�
U LL
a
M
N
N
O
O
N
Va
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
N
Vt
O
O
O
N
V>
LO
N
CO
M
O
N
LO
V►
O
O
O
O
4a
d3
000
O O
O M
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0 0
00
C C
O
C
00
C 0)
O M
O M
V>t4
O Vl
O
V30
C
V>N 0
M O
LO 0
0
N LO
0 O
O
O
LO O
��2
N
6"tq 6"a
�! N
64
LO�
O
N f4
64
64 V3
V3
'
V3
V3
O
O
O
O
LO69
V
O
O
O
O
O
LO
O
V69
Nf4
O
O
O
O
LO69
V
O
O
O
O
O
LO69
�
O
Nf4
000
0 C
C
0
C
0
O
LO LMO
M
N
O
LO
0
N
V)64
C4
V3
00
00
0
C
0 0
C 0)
0 MM
O M
O
O
N
M
LO
CD
LON
C0 f4
��IN
64 t4
C00
N
N
64
M•
V3 68,
O
O LO
O
O LO
0 0
0
O O
O
M
OLO
Oa0
O
V
0n000
OnC
C
C
V 0
C0 O
n
O
CO
O o1
O CO
0
00 0
W
64 V3
64
M f4
eN4 el-91
N
N M
V3
164
f4 V3
X
X
X
X
X
N
�i
m
in
OL
m
U
Q
ui
o
m
n
>t
m
0
c0
O
0,ON
CA
C
(0i
NN
L O
m
pL
2
S�
m
O
U
OO
CO(n
O
O+N.
N
O
c
c
_
N
E
E 0
ci
C
y6
O
E
m
aF
C
0
—aa
N
>
E
y
c
Z•]
N
a)
a) .>
f0
� m
@
E
Cn
E E
l�
O
O
'C
p a)
E 0
Com
y
N
3
oY
0
2
o
m
a)
c
O Q C
C
aO3a)
cr
mmmCocom�a>°�c
aaa
c
m
V5 m
_
m
: a
>
m m
cQ
a�miYY�
m
m�
E y�wa
m
0
a'@
inccnUm
�U
m
a
3 06
��
a—�ir
yatr0
�FY
o
c c
o
c
cYmLoQ
Q
E
3 c
NCO
Q
S a
N to
a00 N
N Q
F Q
F W
0 i.�CO
LO O
LO O
LO n
(nCD
N
I W
LO O
V> V)
0 CD
O
C C
OO LO L LO
CO Co
Vk CO
0 CD
O
C C
Lnn O L LO
CO Co
VJ M,
O O
C C
LLnn LO
CO w
u�r V3
O C
O O
LO LOO
O Co
d1• to
0 0000
O LO
CO N
0) m
LO n
Vj4 61k
LO LO
LO O
LO Cl!
N LO
M
N n
d) V3
n �
OL O
M M
CO C
01 O
N
V! d)
s
`o
a.
y C
v m
N y
O �
a` a
y
Y N
U
c
a
V E
a o L
a. a L
;g E
0 0 a
O O
O O
O
O O
O O
O M
N
f4
M
0
O
N
V3
00
O O
0LO 0
LO
n
00
000
O -ItO
M LO
a00
n0
C C
0
O C00
n N
00 f4
0 O
M
m
O CO
N n
0 w
M
0
O
�
f4 �
f4
6-1 6-1f4
N
f4
f4
X
X
C C
y
`6 L
0o O
C
°�
o
a S=
m m
E
m
E
aEi
y
C L
0
0
L
N 2
m co
�
o m
o
c
C
co
it Em
ti
H
—
aa
c
o
cc rn
m�
m
E
c o
m m
c
a m
> E
m'g
=3:
aCn
>
0
E>
Cc
m
a 3
o
_ O
m
a3�
0
U F
m o
c w
� in
a
U
¢
F Q
3
m
0 r>
C O
L
Q
F Q
o
F O
n 3
m
Q N
o M
O O
N
04 �!
(L
�!
NNN�cc")tO
r
O L
a a
a a
a 85
2 27
C
C C
7
C C
7 7
C Co
7 N
j j
= C
LL
LL LL
LL LL
LL
LL LL
0 0
LL =
o LLn
0
0 0
0 0
0
c c
c c
c
E E
E
E w
E
E E
m m
E E
m m
E c
m
��N��LLLLLLL
E E
E E-E
E E
E E
E E
M
O
O
vol
V)
CD
V)
40
ti
T
O
N
O
d
CD
O.
O
ci
IL
y
C)
C
N
�
N
y
3
a
06
�
IL`
0
14
Packet Pg. 6
6.A.b
M
N
O
N
N
N
O
N
04
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
rn
CD
O
N
Co
CD
O
N
Q
15
Packet Pg. 7
6.A.b
M
EA CD
N
R O
y N
W
H
N
CD
IA
CD
U3
W
N
EA
r
N
N
N
IA
Cm
U3
N
W
N
01
O
N
O
yj
-
Fq
N
O
N
N
N
CD
CmIA
N
Uj
M
N r
r
W
N
01
r
r
O N
N O
N
O
yj
r
Fq
N
O
N
N
N
O
N
w
H
N
N
N
p)
d
N
Q O
N
N
O
N
yj
Fq
N
O
N
a`
CD
IA
Cm
CN
U3
W
N
01
r
O
r
O
yj
r
Fq
r
O
N
N
N
CD
CmIA
CN
U3
Co
O
W
N
01
O
r
r
yj
r
r
N
N
N
O
N V!
r R
O E
N N
W
IL
LL
U
E
i
O
a y
m
c o
E a`
E
w
O
Q
N
y
E
Z
d
U
o
W
a`
O
m
a
U Ui
F
N N Ef?
r E
W
16
r_
s
U
O
r.+
Q
Packet Pg. 218
6.A.b
_00000aaaaaaaaaa
M
v) 6,
fn 69
o o
fn9 b
fn o
fn b9
o CD o fn
N
R N
U)r
O CO
O
N
CD
6q
H
�! Cq
U�
m
ZJ,
N
Co
N
O
N
N
N
O
N
CD
O
O
04
N
LO
O
N
1
0
O
0
O
CIA O
O
m
O
Wi
O
N
00
O O
O
O O
O
N
O O
;: ;;
09.
CD CD
O O
O O
O
O
O O
O O
Co
LO I--
O
O O
h CO
N
r fA
N
�
N
!6
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
h
E
CD
N
CD
Co
M
M
W
n
O
N
a
LL
X
X
L)
C
O
L
U
EU
m
N
N
a
Cu
R
E 3
C
Y
R
R
N
Y
U C
N
C
O
U
C
ILL
C
E
o
4=
7
m
C
CoO
R
_
�
U
C
>
c
R
O
c
@
E
CO
t
3
Co
c
j
O (°
'm a
_
COa
0
3
V
o m
W
7 N.@7
c
2t
N
'D
O
Cr
ra
Z
�
cc>
- N
.S
m76
Cu
N
0 M R
I-
o
a5
�,
m
m LL
W
U`
fn
0 0
C
Co
U 06
LL
LL C
°o0
'O
Q a
o
m o
c
a
Y
R.
o
°�
N
Y 0
a
voUo"-0
L)�wLLaoo>
0
O
Ln
O
N
00
619,
O
Vk
O
Vk
O
O
U.,
Co
Cn
Ok
7
CN
CO
04
Cq
O
N
Cl
N
N
EA
7
CN
O
N
N
N
C,
N
M
N
N
EA
7
CN
N
{
O
M
N
N
EA
N
(C
O
N
M
C,
N
�
N
(D
0
O
O
C,
N
Co
0
LO
C,
N
N
N
Vi
O Co
Co r
0
CO
O
r
O 00
(ND
C,-
CD N -
N
b9
N
!6
t
t I_
LO
V
O
O
7 M
OCo
O
N
W
Vy
�
CN
O
N
U
Co
C
OO
H
C oO
"O H
C
UL (�
�
N
E
E
O
O
O O
O
C
CL
O
L
C
E
E
O
%�
m
c N
�>
Cu
Cl
O
N
= R
0=
U �
N 0
R�
c
�
�
7>
�-O
0
R N
Y=Y.3-.ALL
(n R
C
a 0
N E
c o'
RLL
M
C
7 (L
R 7
LL o
N
t
Q
L
CD
N
y0 O
- 't
4:
R
U
0 7
LL U
+' O
R 7
4: U
>
p R>
U``
C
R 0)
_
O
U
U
o>
LU
U
U
R
U g
LL
C
O>
o
O
o
O
0
0
0
0
0 0
N
C
30
C
N
N
0
0
0
C
U
C N
N
y Lo
N_
(O
N
O
r N
0 r-
N N
O Ln
N N
Ln LO
N N
Ln Ln
N N
(D
N O
Ln Ln
N N_
R
_
r0rrrrrrrrrrrEr
R
�LL
c�Q
-O -O
c c
-O -O
c c
-O -O
c c
-O -O
c c
-O -O
c c
-O �
c w
c c
In
L
C Cl R
C
CLLLL
>
4+LL
>
LLLL
LLLL
LLLL
LLLL
LL
>
LL
> >
LLLL
R
M E
R
Co
m
m E
Cuo
E�
E E
E E
E E
E E
E E
E
0
E E
U
CO
m
m w
0
w
0 0
w w
0 0
w w
0 0
w w
0 0
w w
0 0
w w
0
w E
0 o
w w
y
N
Coy
C
C
C C
C C
C C
C C
C C
C O
C C
C
cc
U
LL R
t U
R N
U E
0LL
E
00
E E
00
E E
00
E E
00
E E
00
E E
0w
E c
a) N
E E—
C
y
R
N
a)R
00
00
tU N
tU N
LU N
LU O
tU N
C
LN
N
C R
E C
C 7
7 E
7 7
7 7
7 7
7 7
7 7
7 S
7 7
E
E
m
cmY
c
c E
EY
E E
E E
E E
a m
`m am
a)z
z `R
z -as
z -as'a�
'a�
'a� 'a�
'a� 'a�
'a� o
'w 'o
>
wmmdmmofmamofafof
0mofS
N
N
M
N
4
N
N
M
N
4
N
N
M
N
a
N
O
N
N
li
N
N
ID
N
N
61r,
N
ID
N
N
A.
17
Packet Pg. 9
k
)
a
w
Q
e
C:,
jj
°C
Ca
\
(D
\}
)
}
|
®
LL%50
)§
Co
�T
o
!k
CUT
Eo
0
)Z5
§\
|k)
150
. ±(*
`)
>0,0
:20
-
�2\�G£\\)k}\j)
E-
*���o==°=°aoC
a33=2�oq
)$]
Sa«Ia2/�.=
o
o�«00
Z5
`E
't
Co
L
ft<mo4�o/of
L)
) §
)L)
Co
18
Packet Pg.2 0771
6.A.b
N
N
CD
a
LL
U
C
O
a.
C N
N O
E a`
> `y w
0
a a
Z
� U
RC w
U Li
O O
O O
O O
O O
M O
(O M
M 0 0
0 O
O O
Vi Vi
Vi cOO
N
Viw
O
CD
O O
V
l0
M c0
M M
V N
V
O c000
0
0 0
C.
N
W O
M M
W N
(O (O
CD
O 'It
n
Vi
(O
Vi
(O
O N
M Co
V
O
(O
O
W c0
O M
N V3
(O 61!3
(O
V3Cli
C4
Cli Cli'a
V3
W N
M co
co c00
v>
�
V
co
M
O
O
Lo
coW
N
V3
V) V
O M
O
O
LO Co
I-
C,
(0
�O
M
co
I,.
V
't
V>
co
(q
O
N
V>
0
V)
O
00 O
O l0
O
O
N
CO O
M
O M
V
��
O N
N
N v
N
V3
N
V3
V3
W
�0lO
O
OO
c0 M
O
V
7
O
Cl)
cO
c0 co
c0
M
(O
Vi
N
M M
M
N
N-
Vi
N Vi
613
V3
Vi
M
0)
E
O
`cl
c
E
@
@
a
E E
E
E
E E
E E
E E
0 4
c
y .—
1 y
g y...
C
O O@
O@
O@
O O
O O
O O
L E
@
o
> a
C C>
rn
C>
C>
C C
C C
C C
0 2
N N
O
O
0) O
0) O
0) 0)
0) 0)
0) 0)
y
E E
w a
E o
E o
E E
E E
E E
0 E@
y
U U=
C
U=
0) C
U=
N N
U U
N 4)
U U
N N
(n
0 @
0)
2
@
N—
@ N------
@ @
@ @
@ @
N (O
N
0) @@
>
Q
—
0 N@@
N N
N N
N N
E
> .@.
a@
d'
C
Q'
Q'
O 0
N
cOOO
Or
mCOMO
N
M�
UL
N(D
N
N N
N N@
N
C
ClLL'
N
N
N N
N N
N N
N N
N N
LL N
(n N
N
ON ON-
0
(O
c0
O
O
N
�
N
Vi
N
V!
(O OVi c0
M Cn
M �
OMO W
Vk V�
M
O M
O
O
M
M
V1
V!
M
M
O
O
(O
c0
M
M
K
VJ
M
M
N
N
M
M
V1
V!
(O
(O
O
N
O
N
Vk
�
h
N
� LO
N
N
M
O
M
Cn
�
V1
V
V!
M
M
M V
V
a LO
N(O
(O N
K
O
a
r
0a
(n LL
N U
E
N
O
u E
O N
N N
E N
•m �
IL >>>
@ £
E E
a@-. a@..
19
O
O
M
0CD
N
O
N
�
O
O
N
N
O
N
O-
O
O
Cl)
�
Cl)
O
N
_O
�
�
o
O
O
O
N
O
M
O
N
O
U')
O
00
r
O
N
N
O
O
O
M
O
O
Cl)
cmQ9�
O
M C.
M
V C.
O O
N
O
N A
00 O
n Co
O
r V
M O
£
O
O
V3 V)
V3 V3
.—
N to
w
t t
rn rn
0 0
P P
Cl) Cl)
J
O O
@ Co
t: 0
N
M
N
C
N
O
C C
E
C 0)
O
N
+-'
LL LL
LL O
�
E
V
O O
O
C
@ 0)
— —
—
@
m
=a
0)
N
C C
0) o
E E
C L6
0)
E
°
4) 4)
4 _
N a
7 7
7
U
oaaa
ii
LL
N
m
d d
d C
C li
0
=
C N
00 @
N
0) O
w @
U-) @
w p N
m U
C C
C N
O O
O �
C
O M
N
O
N
O O
CD O V)
O N
o N
� O
N
O O
r �
M
M
N N
� N
0 0
C
M O
CD
N N
Vt N
O O
LO
00
00
Vt N
CD
O O
to
CD
O)
� �
cncm
OD
cm CD
cq O
bi
(np N
r` m
o E
N N
w
ti
T
O
N
O
T
d
4+
d
CL
O
V
a_
V
N
N
C
L�
r
d
Q
m
0
U
E
0)
c
S
C1
7
w
ram+
F
Packet Pg. 2 1771
k(
k
)
/ §
�
m
m
k\
�
LL
0
/\
0
z
kCo
LL
619
Co
ƒ
\}
$\
CL
\
ID
0
�\
k
))o
)
IF/I
.2
_
§2(
v
\
\
~
E\�
A
G°°
a
r-
C"!
d
CD
CD
CL
E
0
U
a
�
�
Q
k
E
/
2
3
Packet Pg.22
6.A.b
Cl)
O
N
N
O
N
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
Of
O
N
O
O
N
C
C.
EH
0000000
EA
Ef) EA
Ef) EA
Ef) EA
7�h
O
O w
o0 O)O
a0 co
O)
aD
O)
IO
613
LO aD
co h
EA IO
613
a0 N
O) N
6F) N
613
LO
7
O)
613
U) N
L a
M N
N E
O Y
U
C =
O
N
o O
o
y
E
m
@ U
O @
>
Q
C
w
E 2
L
V
L
�
�M
N�
023
N
o
—
-2
M C
O
a) O
N
O
L
co
U
) O
N
d 0
O)
0
C
E
y
o
c
a
a
a
�W
o 0
0
(D
o
U EvQ
�
c
E
°
@
@ �• E
@
N 3
N
a)
co N
N Y
E
o a C
@
U
@
of
w 3
a L
"@O
y y
co
CO C
N
r- N
N
O
H
O
O
O
O
O
O
01
Co
h
a
N
O
613
O O
613
m 0
V>
0 0
613 613
h 0
O
N
(M
61)
N
(M
61)
0
V3 O
H3
Lo
N
V3
Lo
N
EH
N
(A
N
(A
� O
O
V3
O
N
E
.�
a
�
C
t
3
y
o
p
>
'>CL
a
aci
@
O
`0
@
E
O U
>
N
m
N
N LL
OL E
_
N
dy6060UE
aa))
o
y'o'o3c°
o
cl
a
a °
'2z
cl
�a
o
a)C
C
a)
U
warna)
C
y
yU
dL
@
c
d
E
04
@
= c
@@a)
O c
c
2 2
3
3 m
U
o
O
O
a) LLLL(7
O L
L 2
a
Y
Y
Nln
N
(7
=
L.
oQQQM3:
a 2
2 m
m
aciY
(D d
d N
o E
0)
L
•i .0
t
C o
E E
a p
w L
y o
M
�U
aoaow`h°
N�
N Co M
N N V
V)� Co
act
<D
M
O O
O
N
N
Ci
O N N
N N N
to I. -
Cm
O
N N h
N
N N N
O
a
h a0
� � n
O T
aO
to a0 T
1� O
N a
0a
O
N
Co
�
N
O
O
M
N
�
N
O
N
O
M
�
N
O
M
N
�
N
O
O
O
O
M
�
N
O
I�
O
O
M
EH
V
N
V3
lOO
O
M
O
M
61)
N
N
N
N
O
lO
M
61)
O
O
N
N
O
N
_
N
O
N
M
61)
O
N
N
613,
N
O
N
O
n
O
N
N
61)
61)
01
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
N
�
�
O
O
O
N
O
O
LOO
N
d3
V3
a)
h ld
O
N N
w
x
x
x
U)
U)
y
U
E
0
3
m
a
O
o
C
O
o
E
U
(D
O)
@
O
Co
O)
.0 N
@
C
'N
Co
Z
LL
0
M d
N C
=
iy
a
g 2.6
o
O
m °)
N fa
N
>
c
C
a °
te) t
a
E a)
5
O"O
m
O
.
CO
N
E a
w L
o
ID
i
7
C
a)
i O
O
O
ID
CT,L)
L)
N
J a)
a) O
a)
o
a)
=
C
U O@
O
m 0
7d
(Dz(D
i
(Dz
h
w
N
O
N
w
clj
O
N
O
O
ON
O
O
to
N
O
O
to
N
4a
N
m
a
=
O
L
O
U
N
V
QI
^
IL
h
ti
Jrnm
N
—_ N
3 a a
�
lL0 T
A
U
N UO
O
V
WE
a_
Nam
V
o
a
a o
a)
y
>
>
U
N <
y
o b b
LL'
d
"gym
m
O O O
w
o E E
O
wi!
N
m
H
Z c N c)
21
Packet Pg. 2 3
6.A.b
M
N
O
N
N
N
O
N
O
O
N
00
O
N
r
n E
O .—
N 0)
W
IL
LL
0
E
L
�
a
o
a
a
0
N
O
-p
U
Y
� m
m
E a`
r
E
E
a)
Of
m
0 3
c
L N
Q
O
N
E M
F
CO
CO a
CL
0
3
3
U
a
Li
Cn
in
O
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
N
LO
CO
000(Dn
00�
m
O
Ln
U)
(Al
(f3
O
(f3
O
(D
CO
O
O
Co
EA
M
LOO
N
O
O
V
V
V
ONLC�
O0
00
O
O
O
0
W
LO
O
0
M
LO
M
m
6S
Or--
04
V)
ER
O
N(D
N
T
�000NCl)
O
00
N
7
N
Il.M
M
CV
N
CV
-
C\
C
Efl
6s
V>
6s
V>
6s
6S
N
V)
00
00
7
M
O
O
-
fA
EH
ffi
O
CDL
Co
LO
O
N
O
LC)
O
CO
Co
CO
GO.
0
(v)
Co
(A
O
O
Co
O
O
O
(
iz
CD LC)
(M
N
(MD
EA
(D
m
ff3
Co
O
CO
Ni
0
N
v)
CM
CD
(D
Co
v)
7
ER
(fl
Com
h
LO
r
O
O
V
r
M
V
N
En
e,
CA
LO
O
O
O
N
LO
(V
Co
C:,0
C:,
O
C6
L6
CA
Efl
6s
�
EJ9
0
00
N
Co
m
M
C`OM
CD
Co
O
ON-
O
LO
M_
N
m
V!
ffi
N
C
(n
C
N
C
N
C
N
C
N
C
N
C
N
C
N
C
N
C
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
>
O
>
O
>>>>>>>
OOaa
O
O
O
O
O
r
N>
yO
Q.
a
a
a
t
a
(o
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
a
a
c
c
c
cc
(0
(0
C6
(0
cc
(0
cc
(0
cc
.O
O
O
-C
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
om
9
U)
-coo
c
C
N
C
N
T
c
C
c
C
c
C
c
E
E
E
m
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
>
m
a�
u
>
u
>
2
Y
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
3
3
3
0>
—
u
m
u
E
f0
rn
a)
a)
a)
a)
a)
a)
a
a)
CL
a)
Cl
a)
CL
a)
Cl
a)
CL
a)
Cl
a)
cn
a-
<i
pa'
a'
sw
c.E��aaaaaaaa
r
Cp
h
>
Q
-O
a)
3
N
a)
-
a)
a)
a)
3
=
N
3
3
N
3
a)
3
O)
3
a)
a)
a)
3
a)
a)
a)
a)
a
0
a
0
a
0
ly)
a)
a)
a)
a)
a)
a)
a)
a)
a)
a)
a)
a)
0)
a)
0)
°tS
c
(j
to
(n
-o
r
N
0
LO
CD
(O
O
N
M
I
N
O@
a)
0
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
0
0
N E S) a oo
N
Cp o0
O 00
00 00
Co
n
Q Co
C4 n
N
N
n
r
N
N
(9
VH
Co
� 00
cc
00
It
V
N
N
V3
V3
V
N
6�9 V
to
M
M
M
M
N
N
IS
(H
00
00
6
n
r
N
V
N
V
04
04
h
o h
V
V
N N
1717
N N
(9 (H
In
O
Vi lC/
T
T
Co
00
(A
(A
O
O
M
M
V3
V3
N n
1-
00 W
1, 0 LL7
V
N
V
111i (A
O
O
LO
OM
M V
EA N
VJ
(9 N
�
ER
O
E
w
O
t
0)
7
C7
r
E
N
c
12
N O
U
O
O
O
L
N
d
E
O Co
O
En
0
N
•N
o
2
N
a`
7
N
r
Ca
oCS LL
3
�
r
od
o
u
a>
c
a
>
v
>
w
C
C
V
LL
LL
N C
°1
2
,ts
°
°
E 2
L
p~
c
(u
c
m
L F
c r
m
c
od p
.c
=
u E
N E
aEi
N
Cn
.0u
E N
o m
m
°"
a
d o
(n
a)
a
E
E
a
J=
m
C J
J
H
H H
ti
T
O
N
O
T
d
CD
CL
0
ci
I
a_
V
N
H
Q
C
d
t
V
yr
Q
22
Packet Pg. 2 47
6.A.b
o
�
M
M
O
O
EF7
N
O
N
ER
O
0CIA
O
N
O
Hi
O
N
O
O
to
N
Vi
N
C)
p
O
O
r
N
N
O
N
O
O
N
�
G
O
N
EJ7
V3
O
C
O
N
O
Gq
O
N
O
O
U9
N
V!
N
o
O
O
O
01
O
N
fA
O
N
(A
O
C
O
C
EO9
00
00
p
00
T
O
O
64
!f)
O
to
N
N
y
O
C
O
O
y
EO9
{
O
O
� cc
O
O
N N
64
69
O
N N
W
C1
N_
W
E
N
C
N
�
O
J
y
N
C
C
O
�
M
N
N
O
N
N
N
C
Co
_
C
N
3
LL
M
-0
N
T
=
C
C
O
0-
fV
s
c
O
Co
?
ao
C
7
O
CO
C
m
7
N
Co
Of
L
Co
0)
0)
N
0)
_
u
N
N
LL
>
7
C
C
D:
U
o
>
y
O
6
U
V
Of
N
m
C
U
y
C
C1
y
y
C
O
C
O
L
N
a'cUm
c
N
d
a��
7
w
W C,4
ti
r
O
N
O
r
CD
d
Q
E
O
V
a.
V
N
H
Q
d
E
L
U
m
Q
23
Packet Pg. 225
6.A.b
M
00 6'9
O C'4
w N
N
O
O CD
U3
T
CO
�
O
N
fA
O
O
00
O O
o G
O C
Cl)
O
V) V)
00
N
N
M
N If)
n r
O n
o v
o m
v v
eo ao
CmCIA
O N
N N
O N
to Cli
N N
OK 00
O
N
(fi 61)
619
M
N p
pp N
T
O
N
O
w
W
V O
O N
O O
� N
IL
0)
T
O
N
Co
O
N
O (MD
O O �
I` N Lo Co
T
�! W)
O .— N
Cm0 V)
W
IL
LL
U
N
N
a) N a)
0 U C
2O
m o
c
C Cc
c U m
E
E V 6 .
W U a) N C
Q C O O LL
Z a)da
C C
O O U
C
a .
W Co
as c c a
O
ILUU0
N N
O IN
O Co
Ifj V)
H V�
�
OM
O
M M
N N
fA Vi
0 0
In
n
ri cd
N
U
N
0
3
m
� U
L) N y
L � �
Y Cl)
6 U :2 J
c m Q
0 � 00
�O
Q
24
Packet Pg. 2 6
6.A.b
CIP
PARKS
PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS
Q
25
Packet Pg. 227
6.A.b
c
ca
a
c
m
E
m
O
L
Q
E
Q
V
a.
d
u
m
U-
.Q
V
M
N
O
N
Q
26
Packet Pg. 228
6.A.b
CIP PARKS
PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS
FUND 125 - CAPITAL PROJECTS
Q
27
Packet Pg. 229
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Anderson Center ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $160000
Field/Court/Stage
700 Main Street, Snohomish County, within Edmonds City limits
2.3 acres; zoned public neighborhood park/openspace field
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Upgrades to youth sports field, picnic and playground amenities
and children's play equipment. In 2018, we will be replacing the play equipment, which is
beyond its use full life.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: As a neighborhood park, the Frances Anderson Center
serves the community with various sports, playground and field activities including various
special events. Upgrade and additions essential to meet demand for use.
SCHEDULE: 2018-2023
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Professional
services
$150,000
Engineering &
Administration
Construction
$
$5,000
$0
$5,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$150,000
$
$5,000
$0
$5,000
* all or a portion of this project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts.
Q
28
Packet Pg. 230
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Brackett's Landing ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $10,000
Improvements
4;
South: Main Street and Railroad Avenue south of Edmonds Ferry Terminal on Puget Sound
North: 2.7 acres with tidelands and adjacent to Department of Natural Resources public tidelands with Underwater Park
South: 2.0 acres with tidelands south of ferry terminal. Regional park/Zoned commercial waterfront. Protected as public park
through Deed -of -Right; partnership funding IAC/WWRC/LWCF /DNR-ALEA & Snohomish Conservation Futures
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Landscape beautification, irrigation, furnishings/bench
maintenance, exterior painting, repairs, jetty improvements/repair, north cove sand, habitat
improvement, fences, interpretive signs, structure repairs, sidewalk improvements, restroom
upgrades.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Retention of infrastructure for major waterfront park,
regional park that serves as the gateway to Edmonds from the Kitsap Peninsula.
SCHEDULE: 2018-2023
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
Construction
$
$
$5,000
$0
$5,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$
$
$5,000
$0
$5,000
' all or part of this project may quality for 1 % for the Arts
ti
0
N
O
a
a
Q.
E
0
U
U
N
F-
Q
a
W
E
U
�a
Q
29
Packet Pg. 231
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: City Park Improvements I ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $15,000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
City Park.
Continued pathway, access improvements and ongoing upgrades to
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Make ongoing upgrades to City Park as referenced in the
PROS plan.
SCHEDULE: 2018-2023
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
Construction
$
$5,000
$5,000
$
$5,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$
$5,000
$5,000
$
$5,000
*all or part of this project may qualify for 1 % for the arts
Q
30
Packet Pg. 232
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Civic Center ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $12,050,000
Improvements / Stadium Demolition
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Civic Center Improvements / Stadium Demolition As part of the
master planning process for Civic, and in consideration of the current condition of the stadium, it
is being recommended to demolish the current stadium. The City also has some grant funds
available to assist with this. In addition, the City will begin the design development process for
the completion of the master plan.
PROJECT BENEFITI RATIONALE:
The Civic Master plan was adopted in 2017. Funds will be set aside, and grant funds applied for
in order to develop the master plan. This is a high priority in the PROS plan.
SCHEDULE: 2018 - 2023
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Planning and
Stud
$500,000
Construction
$500,000
TOTAL
$500,000
$500,000
Q
31
Packet Pg. 233
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Fishing Pier & Restrooms I ESTIMATED COST: $125,000
LWCF/IAC Acquisition and Development Project
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Fishing pier parking lot landscape improvements. Re -tile and
renovate restroom facilities.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Capital improvements to retain capital assets and
enhance western gateway to the Puget Sound.
SCHEDULE: 2018-2023
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Planning/Study
Eng. & Admin.
Construction
$75,000
$10,000
$10,000
$10,000
$10,000
$10000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$75,000
$10,000
$10,000
$10,000
$10,000
$10000
* all or part of this Project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts
a
32
Packet Pg. 234
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN DESCRIPTION
6.A.b
PROJECT NAME: Community Garden ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $145,000
1
}
ar r
� t
t �
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Locate and develop a community garden site.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This was formerly planned for the Former Woodway HS
site. This is adopted as part of the PROS plan.
SCHEDULE: 2018-2023
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT
COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
Construction
$145,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$145000
all or a portion of this project may quality for 1 % for the Arts
33
ti
r
O
N
O
d
d
Q
E
0
U
E:
U
N
Q
r
c
a�
E
a
Packet Pg. 235
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Maplewood Park ESTIMATED COST: $15,000
Improvements
89th Place West and 197th Street SW, Edmonds City limits, within Snohomish County
12.7 acres (10.7 acres Open Space & 2 acres Neighborhood Park) Zoned Public
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Improvements to the picnic, roadway, parking, play area and
natural trail system to Maplewood Park.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improvements to retain site as an asset to the
neighborhood park system.
SCHEDULE: 2018-2023
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Planning/Study
Eng. & Admin.
Construction
$0
$5,000
$
$5,000
$0
$5000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$0
$5,000
$
$5,000
$0
$5000
* all or part of this Project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts
a
34
Packet Pg. 236
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Marina Beach Park ESTIMATED COST: $8-10M
Improvements
South of the Port of Edmonds on Admiral Way South, Edmonds City limits, Snohomish County
4.5 acres / Regional Park / Zoned Commercial Waterfront, marina beach south purchased with
federal transportation funds.
WWRC / IAC Acquisition Proiect; Protected through Deed -of -Right RCW
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
Begin development of Master plan, daylighting Willow Creek.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improvements to retain site as an asset to the regional
waterfront park system.
SCHEDULE: 2018-2023
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Planning/Study
Eng. & Admin.
Construction
$
$
$500,000
$500,000
$500,000
$500,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$
$
$500,000
$500,000
$500,000
$500,000
'all or part of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts.
35
Packet Pg. 237
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Mathay Ballinger Park I ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $30,000
781h Place W. & 241" St. at Edmonds City Limits. 1.5 acres/Neighborhood Park/Zoned Public.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
Improvements to Mathay Ballinger Park. This next year the City will be creating a pathway
from the park to the Interurban trail to promote both pedestrian and bicycle access to/from the
park and neighborhood.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improvements to retain site as an asset in the
neighborhood park system.
SCHEDULE: 2018-2023
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Planning/Study
Eng. & Admin.
Construction
$20,000
$5,000
$0
$5,000
$0
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$20,000
$5,000
$0
$5,000
1 $0
* all or part of this Project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts
Q
36
Packet Pg. 238
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Meadowdale Clubhouse ESTIMATED COST: $5,000
Grounds
6801 N. Meadowdale Road, Edmonds City limits, within Snohomish County
1.3 acres / Neighborhood Park / Zoned RS20
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Improvements to the parking area, wooded area, trail system and
landscaping of exterior clubhouse at Meadowdale Clubhouse site.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improvements to retain site as an asset with installation
that provides community use of the facility and north Edmonds programming for day care,
recreation classes and preschool activities.
SCHEDULE: 2017-2022
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Planning/Study
Eng. & Admin.
Construction
$
$0
$5,000
$0
$0
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$
$0
$5,000
$0
$0
. all or part of this Project may qualify for 1% for the Arts
a
37
Packet Pg. 239
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Pine Ridge Park ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $10,000
Improvements
83`a Avenue West and 204' St. SW, Edmonds City Limits, within Snohomish County
22 acres (20 acres zoned openspace/2 acres neighborhood park) Zoned Public; Adopted Master Plan
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Forest improvements, habitat improvements, tree planting, wildlife
habitat attractions, trail improvements, signs, parking. Natural trail links under Main Street
connecting to Yost Park.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Retention of natural open space habitat site and regional
trail connections.
SCHEDULE: 2018-2023
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Planning/Study
Eng. & Admin.
Construction
$0
$5,000
$0
$5,000
$0
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$
$5,000
$0
$5,000
$0
New additions meet the 1 % for the Arts Ordinance requirements
a
38
Packet Pg. 240
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Seaview Park ESTIMATED COST: $40,000
Improvements
8011 Street West and 18611 Street SW, Snohomish County, within Edmonds City limits
5.5 acres; Neighborhood Park/ Zoned Public; Purchased and developed with LWCF funds through IAC; protected with Deed -
Of -Right
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Annual repair and upgrade to facilities and fields. Maintenance of
tennis courts, pathway improvements, and play area. Replace roof on restrooms.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Site serves as neighborhood park with children's play
area, open lawn, softball/baseball fields and soccer fields, restroom facilities, basketball court,
parking and tennis courts.
SCHEDULE: 2018-2023
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Planning/Study
Eng. & Admin.
Construction
$25000
$10,000
$0
$5,000
$0
1 % for Art
TOTAL
1 $25000
$10,000
1 $0
�77$5,000
1 $0
* all or part of this Project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts
Q
39
Packet Pg. 241
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Waterfront Redevelopment ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $3,595,000
/ Waterfront Walkway Completion
--------------------------
.._--_.......
------------
A{�
Propvwd Edmonds
Wam(from Garver
Arws;
-ycox ww •a u.v�
r ,o. yyr .wo r
r,ce w careha �+•• s+� w.ra.
swa - Hsu m�
o E:..•
[�ebp Sewur bAemf•
lsa5z. '�
M9gwed Tbrn pfl w
Yom'MVronwb •..
gran W ran p.ur� o
6e-7�
wipf..d Mc`+.{4 P."
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Work with Sr. Center to renovate surrounding park, parking lot
and walkway. Remove creosote pier, reintroduce habitat for fish and wildlife. Increase access
to the waterfront. Connect waterfront walkway from Brackett's Landing South to Olympic
Beach, including completion in front of the Ebb tide condominiums.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Provide anew Senior and Community Center and
provide a new beachfront walkway. One of the top priorities in the PROS plan is to open up
beach -front access.
SCHEDULE: 2018-2023
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Planning/Study
$343000
Eng. & Admin.
Construction
$7000
$170000
$0
$0
$0
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$350000
$170000
$0
$0
$0
'all or part of this Project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts
Q
40
Packet Pg. 242
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Yost Park / Pool ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $220,000
Improvements
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Pool replastering, tile work, and annual anticipated and
unanticipated repairs. Add in -pool play amenities. Park site improvements and repairs to trails
and bridges, picnicking facilities, landscaping, parking, tennis/pickleball courts and erosion
control. ADA improvements.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Beautiful natural area serves as upland area for
environmental education programs as well as enjoyable setting for seasonal Yost Pool users.
SCHEDULE: 2018-2023
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
Construction
$40,000
$50,000
$50,000
$25,000
$30,000
$25000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
1 $40,000
$50,000
$50,000
$25,000
$30,000
$25000
* all or part of this project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts.
a
41
Packet Pg. 243
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Parklet Development, 4th ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $40,000
Avenue Cultural Corridor
A parklet is a small urban park that is made by creating a sidewalk extension that provides
more space and amenities for people using the street. Usually parklets are installed on top of
parking lanes and use one or more parking spaces, but do not permanently impact the
underlying street. Parklets typically extend out from the sidewalk at the level of the sidewalk to
the width of the adjacent parking space creating a patio and seating area, often including
plantings. Parklets are public space and open to everyone.
10
.ON
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Develop one or more parklets on the 4th Avenue Cultural Corridor.
The first parklet will be created on 4th Avenue adjacent to the ECA. The design will be
developed with Parks crew and an artist/landscape consultant.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Provide a small urban park along the 4th Avenue Cultural
Corridor with views of Puget Sound and seating on a popular walking route. Parklets are a
resting and a gathering space and highlight the social function integral to streets. The
importance of additional small gathering spaces is referred to in both the Community Cultural
Plan and the PROS Plan.
SCHEDULE: 2018-2023
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Construction
$40000
$0
$
$0
$0
TOTAL
$40000
$0
$
$0
$0
a
42
Packet Pg. 244
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: City Gateway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $40,000
Replacements
(.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Design and construct new gateway elements at SR 104 and 5`
Ave. S and at Sunset and Main St. to replace aging and deteriorated signage. In addition, find a
new location on the north entrance to Edmonds.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: The PROS Plan, Community Cultural Plan and Streetscape
Plan all refer to the importance of these visual "gateways" to the City of Edmonds. New signage
with artistic elements will enhance the gateways and reinforce Edmonds reputation as a cultural
destination for visitors.
SCHEDULE: 2018-2023
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Repairs &
Maintenance
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
TOTAL
$0
$40000
$0
$0
$0
a
43
Packet Pg. 245
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: City Park Storage Building � ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $150,000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Construct a new City Park Storage Building
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Construct a new City Park storage building to replace the
previous storage building which was destroyed by fire in 2016.
SCHEDULE: 2018 - 2023
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Construction
$150000
$0
$0
$0
$0
TOTAL
$150000
$0
$0
$0
$0
a
44
Packet Pg. 246
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Hickman Park
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $50,000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Secure park slope erosion area in northwest corner of park.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: The northwest area of Hickman park has experienced
some erosion on the slope that borders private residences. This project seeks to take care of
our current assets, as is a priority in the PROS plan.
SCHEDULE: 2018-2023
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Construction
$50000
$0
$0
$0
$0
TOTAL
$50000
$0
$0
$0
$0
a
45
Packet Pg. 247
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Outdoor Fitness Zones I ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $175,000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Create outdoor fitness zones by adding fitness equipment within
the park system.
PROJECT BENEFITI RATIONALE: Provide outdoor places to exercise to improve the health
and wellness of citizens and park users, which provides adults the opportunity to exercise while
their children play.
SCHEDULE: 2018-2023
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Professional
Services
$75000
Construction
$0
$0
$0
$0
TOTAL
$75000
$0
$0
$0
$0
a
46
Packet Pg. 248
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Citywide Beautification I ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $126,000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Beautification citywide to include Library, Senior Center, outdoor
plazas, City Park, corner parks, irrigation, planting, mulch, FAC Center, vegetation, tree
plantings, streetscape/gateways/street tree planting, flower basket poles.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve beautification citywide and provide
comprehensive adopted plan for beautification and trees.
SCHEDULE: 2018-2023
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
Construction
$21,000
$21,000
$21,000
$21,000
$21,000
$21000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$21,000
$21,000
$21,000
$21,000
$21,000
$21000
a
47
Packet Pg. 249
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Citywide Park ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $300,000
Improvements / Misc Small Projects
Z" `S
it,��•�- ,.
IS
1 - �
S.'
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Citywide park facility and public landscaping improvements
including signage, interpretive signs, buoys, tables, benches, trash containers, drinking
fountains, backstops, bike racks, lighting, small landscaping projects, play areas and
equipment. Landscape improvements at beautification areas and corner parks, public gateway
entrances into the city and 4th Avenue Corridor from Main St. to the Edmonds Center for the
Arts, SR 104, street tree and streetscape improvements.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Overall capital improvements for citywide park facilities
and streetscape improvements in public areas.
SCHEDULE: 2018-2023
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Planning/Study
Engineering / Administration
Construction
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
ti
r
0
N
0
a�
a�
Q.
E
0
U
a
U
N
Q
c
a�
E
U
ra
a
48
Packet Pg. 250
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Sports Field Upgrade / ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $50,000
Playground Partnerships
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Partnerships with local schools, organizations, or neighboring
jurisdictions to upgrade additional youth ball field or play facilities or playgrounds to create
neighborhood park facilities at non -City facilities.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Annual partnerships with matching funds to create
additional facilities.
SCHEDULE: 2018-2023
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Engineering &
Administration
Construction
$
$0
$25,000
$0
$25000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$
$0
$25,000
$0
$25000
a
49
Packet Pg. 251
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Miscellaneous Unpaved ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $ 20,000
Trail / Bike Path Improvements
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Complete portions of designated trail through public parks to meet the
goals of the Bicycle Plan and Pathway Plan.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Walking and connections was listed as a high priority in the
comprehensive Park Plan from public survey data. Creating trails, paths and bike links is essential to
meet the need for the community. Provides for the implementation of the citywide bicycle path
improvements and the elements and goals of the citywide walkway plan. Linked funding with
engineering funding.
SCHEDULE: 2018 - 2023
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
Construction
$0
$10,000
$0
$10,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$0
$10,000
$0
$10,000
* all or part of these projects may qualify for 1 % for the Arts.
a
50
Packet Pg. 252
6.A.b
CIP PARKS
PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS
FUND 126 - SPECIAL CAPITAL/ PARKS
ACQUISITION
Q
51
Packet Pg. 253
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
6.A.b
PROJECT NAME: Debt Service on Approved ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $988,118
Capital Projects and Acquisitions
Fi--
� RL
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Approximate annual debt service payments on:
Marina Beach / Library Roof: $80,830
PSCC (Edmonds Center for the Arts): $54,300
Anderson Center Seismic Retrofit: $26,850
PROJECT BENEFITI RATIONALE: Debt service to pay for approved capitol projects
SCHEDULE: 2017-2022
COST
BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Planning/Study
Eng. & Admin.
Construction
1 % for Art
Principal &
Interest
$161,980
$159,868
$163,120
$165,820
$167,250
$170,080
TOTAL
$161,980
$159,868
$163,120
$165,820
$167,250
$170,080
" all or part of this Project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts
Q
52
Packet Pg. 254
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Miscellaneous Open ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,200,000
Space / Land
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Acquisition of properties when feasible that will benefit citizens that
fit the definitions and needs identified in the Parks Comprehensive Plan.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Fulfills needs of citizens for parks, recreation and open
space.
SCHEDULE: 2018 - 2022
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT
COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Land
$0
$0
$200,000
$200,000
$200000
200000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$0
$0
$200,000
$200,000
$200000
200000
a
53
Packet Pg. 255
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
6.A.b
PROJECT NAME: Waterfront Redevelopment ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $3,595,000
/ Waterfront Walkway Completion
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Redevelop waterfront to secure access to Puget Sound and
walkways along the beachfront for public use as indentified in the Parks, Recreation & Open
Space Comprehensive Plan.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Public access of waterfront and tidelands on Puget
Sound.
SCHEDULE: 2018-2022
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Planning/Study
Eng. & Admin.
Construction
150000
$0
$0
$0
$0
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
a
54
Packet Pg. 256
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Civic Center Development ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $510,000
/ Stadium Demolition
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Civic Center Development / Stadium Demolition.
As part of the Master planning process for Civic, and in consideration of the current condition
of the stadium, it is being recommended to demolish the current stadium. The City also has
some grant funds available to assist with this. In addition, develop a signature downtown park
at this site.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Civic Center Development / Stadium Demolition.
The Civic Master plan will be complete by early 2017. Funds will be set aside, and grant
funds applied for in order to develop the master plan. This is a high priority in the PROS plan.
SCHEDULE: 2018 - 2023
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Planning
210,000
Construction
$0
$0
$0
$
$
TOTAL
$210,000
$0
$0
$
$
Q
55
Packet Pg. 257
6.A.b
CIP PARKS
PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS
FUND 132 - PARKS CONSTRUCTION
Q
56
Packet Pg. 258
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Civic Center Development ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $12,050,000
/ Stadium Demolition
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Civic Center Development / Stadium Demolition.
As part of the Master planning process for Civic, and in consideration of the current condition
of the stadium, it is being recommended to demolish the current stadium. The City also has
some grant funds available to assist with this. In addition, the City will begin the design
development process for the completion of the master plan.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Civic Center Development / Stadium Demolition.
The Civic Master plan was adopted in 2017. Funds will be set aside, and grant funds applied
for in order to develop the master plan. This is a high priority in the PROS plan.
SCHEDULE: 2018 - 2023
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT
COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Design
750,000
Construction
$0
$11,000,000
$300,000
TOTAL
$750,000
$11,000,000
$300,000
a
57
Packet Pg. 259
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Waterfront Redevelopment ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $2,875,000
/ Waterfront Walkway Completion
--------------------------
.._--_.......
------------
A{�
Propvwd Edmonds
Waterfront Genrer
ArUS;
-ycox ww •a u.v�
r ,o. yyr .wo r
r,ce w careha �+•• s+� w.ra.
swa - Hsu m�
f
o E:..•
[�ebp Sewur bAemf•
lsa5z. '�
M9gwed Tbrn pfl w
Yom'MVronwb •..
gran W ran p.ur� o
6e-7�
wipf..d Mc`+.{4 P."
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Work with Sr. Center to renovate surrounding park, parking lot
and walkway. Remove creosote pier, reintroduce habitat for fish and wildlife. Increase access
to the waterfront. Connect waterfront walkway from Brackett's Landing South to Olympic
Beach, including completion in front of the Ebb tide condominiums.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Provide anew Senior and Community Center and
provide a new beachfront walkway. One of the top priorities in the PROS plan is to open up
beachfront access.
SCHEDULE: 2018-2023
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Planning/Study
Eng. & Admin.
Construction
$1,875,000
$1,000,000
$0
$0
$0
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$1,875,000
1 $1,000,000
1 $0
$0
$0
0
* all or part of this Project may qualify for 1% for the Arts
Q
58
Packet Pg. 260
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
6.A.b
PROJECT NAME: Edmonds Marsh / Willow ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $3,200,000
Creek Daylighting
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Using strategies and recommendations identified in the comprehensive
management plan, protect site from adjacent development and storm water impacts. Continue to
support day -lighting of Willow Creek to Puget Sound. Sidewalk / pathway repairs and continuation
of walkway / viewing path to the hatchery if environmentally feasible. Work with Friends of the
Edmonds Marsh, People for Puget Sound and others in the rejuvenation and management of the
marsh. This also includes planning for the outfall of Willow Creek into Marina Beach Park.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: The Edmonds Marsh is a unique urban salt and fresh water
marsh with abundant habitat / wildlife species. It is a designated and protected bird sanctuary.
Protection is vital. Co -fund the completion of a master plan using Storm Water Utility funds as
defined in the comprehensive Storm Water Management Plan. As well as grant funds available
through various agencies and foundations.
SCHEDULE: 2018-2023
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
Construction
$0
$
$1,500,000
$1,500,000
$0
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$200,000
$
$1,500,000
$1,500,000
$0
all or part of this project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts.
Q
59
Packet Pg. 261
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Outdoor Fitness Zones I ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $100,000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Create outdoor fitness zones by adding fitness equipment within
the park system.
PROJECT BENEFITI RATIONALE: Provide outdoor places to exercise to improve the health
and wellness of citizens and park users, which provides adults the opportunity to exercise while
their children play.
SCHEDULE: 2018-2023
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Construction
$100000
$0
$0
$0
$0
TOTAL
$100,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
a
60
Packet Pg. 262
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: City Park Storage Building � ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $60,000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Construct a new City Park Storage Building
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Construct a new City Park storage building to replace the
previous storage building which was destroyed by fire in 2016.
SCHEDULE: 2018 - 2023
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Construction
$60000
$0
$0
$0
$0
TOTAL
$60000
$0
$0
$0
$0
a
61
Packet Pg. 263
UP / CIP COMPARISON (2017 TO 2018)
6.A.c
ADDED PROJECTS
FUND PROJECT NAME I CFP I DESCRIPTION
16
Museum exterior door replacements
Replace non -historic doors to comply with historic registry specifications
16
Museum East window replacement
Replace East facing windows that are damaged with approved replacement
double hung sash approved by State Historic Architect
16
Library West deck water seal and repair parking ceiling
Waterproof deck and repair pan -deck ceiling at covered parking
16
FAC metal flashing replacement and repair
Remove and replace failed metal flashing as needed to eliminate water intrusion
16
PW replace failed insulated window units
Replace glazing at failed window units
16
CH replace failed insulated window units
Replace glazing at failed window units
16
FAC add building controls to both boiler systems
Add Alerton building controls to existing boilers
16
FAC steam radiator retrofits
Retrofit steam radiators as needed to replace abandoned or leaking radiators
16
Exterior building washing, sealing and painting
Wash seal and paint building exteriors
16
Replace carpeting and flooring
Replace warn carpeting and flooring as necessary
16
CH electrical infastructure survey and replacement
Survey and replace electrical infastructure at CH, phase 1 of 5
16
Clean and maintenance City facility roofs
Cleand inspect and maintain roofs of all City Facilities
16
CH Planned maintenance and replacemnet of HVAC
Replace failed HVAC unit and maintain all existing end of life HVAC infastructure.
Yearly program
16
Retro comission City building
Retro Commission a City building to bring HVAC operation to engineered
specifications and optimize DDC system and energy performance.
16
CH heat tape installation
Add freeze protection to uninsulated vulnerable water pipes
16
Museum structural analysis of upper fa4ade
Analysis of upper fagade structrure since previous stop gap repair measure
16
Failed sash and glazing replacement
Replace failed window sash and glazing at various non -historic locations
16
MCH replace damaged and warn flooring at kitchen and entry
Replace existing damaged and warn flooring at Kitchen and entry
112
Hwy 99 @ 234th St. SW Intersection Improvements
X
Install traffic signal at Hwy 99 @ 234th St. SW
112
SR-104 @ 100th Ave. W Intersection Improvements /Access Management
X
Improve safety to access driveways at SR-104 @ 100th / installation of mid -block
crossing north of the intersection
112
89th PI. W Retaining Wall
Install new retaining wall along 89th Pl. W
112
Dayton St. Walkway from 3rd Ave. to 9th Ave.
X
Improve pedestrian safety along Dayton St. from 3rd Ave. to 9th Ave.
112
Railroad St. Sidewalk from Dayton St. to Main St. / SR-104
X
Improve pedestrian safety along Railroad St. from Dayton St. to Main St / SR-104
112
SR-104 @ 76th Ave. W Non -Motorized Transportation Improvements
X
Extend bike lanes and install APS / new ADA curb ramps at SR-104 @ 76th
112
SR-104 @ Hwy. 99 Multi Use path
X
improve non -motorized transportation safety from Hwy 99 @ 244th to SR-104 @
240th
112
Pedestrian Improvements (SR-104 Off -Ramps)
X
Improve pedestrian crossing safety at SR-104 off ramps along Hwy. 99
112
Admiral Way Crosswalk
Improve pedestrian crossing safety at Dayton St. @ Admiral Way
112
0
0
N
a)
N
O
O_
O
d
N
t
M
N
O
N
0
0
c
O
N
�L
CU
Q
E
O
U
d
LL
V
d
U
ni
H
Q
r
c
d
E
t
c�
tv
r
w
Q
Page 1 of 5 Packet Pg. 264
125
Frances Anderson Center Playground Replacement
I Consistent with PROS plan
125
Hickman Park, hillside erosion mitigation
Consistent with PROS plan, maintain parks.
125
126
Civic Park design
x
Consistent with PROS plan, master plan
126
Waterfront Redevelopment/Ebb tide walkway design
x
Consistent with PROS plan, master plan
126
84th Ave. W Overlay from 220th St. SW to 212th St. SW
Complete overlay along 84th Ave. W from 220th St. SW to 212th St. SW
126
89th PI. W Retaining Wall
Install new retaining wall along 89th PI. W
421
2024 Replacement Program
Estimated future costs for waterline replacements.
421
212th & 76th Improvements
Accounting changed to be by fund. So instead of a reinbursement, this project
was added to all respective utilities which contributed to this project.
421
2018 Waterline Overlays
Estimated future costs for road repairs due to waterline replacements.
Dayton 3rd to 9th
422
Accounting changed to be by fund. So instead of a reinbursement, this project
was added to all respective utilities which contributed to this project.
2017 Waterline Replacement Project
Accounting changed to be by fund. So instead of a reinbursement, this project
422
was added to all respective utilities which contributed to this project.
423
2024 Sewer Replacement/Rehab/Improvements
Estimated future costs for sewerline replacements/rehab/impr.
423
212th & 76th Improvements
Accounting changed to be by fund. So instead of a reinbursement, this project
was added to all respective utilities which contributed to this project.
423
Dayton 3rd to 9th
Accounting changed to be by fund. So instead of a reinbursement, this project
was added to all respective utilities which contributed to this project.
423
Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase 1
Separated from single line item to account by project.
423
Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase 2
Separated from single line item to account by project.
423
2018 Sewerline Overlays
Estimated future costs for road repairs due to sewerline repl/rehab/impr.
6.A.c
0
0
N
N
N
O
O_
O
d
N
t
M
N
0
N
0
0
c
O
N
�L
CL
E
O
U
d
U-
U
d
U
ni
H
t—
Q
r
c
m
E
t
c�
tv
r
w
Q
Page 2 of 5 Packet Pg. 265
CFP / CIP COMPARISON (2017 TO 2018)
6.A.c
DELETED PROJECTS
FUND I PROJECT NAME I
CFP DESCRIPTION
16
Museum exterior door replacements
Replace non -historic doors to comply with historic registry specifications
16
Museum East window replacement
Replace East facing windows that are damaged with approved replacement
double hung sash approved by State Historic Architect
16
Council/Court Chamber AV upgrade
Council/Court Chamber AV upgrade
16
MCH gutter replacement
Complted 2016
16
Estimate of CH security needs
Completed 2017
16
FAC spot flooring replacement in Beach Ranger office
Completed 2017
16
PW replace failed insulated window units
Scheduled to complete 2017
16
CH replace failed insulated window units
Scheduled t o complete 2017
16
FAC add building controls to both boiler systems
Scheduled to complete 2017
16
FAC steam radiator retrofits
Completed 2016
16
Replace carpeting and flooring
Complete 2017
16
16
Clean and maintenance City facility roofs
Scheduled to complete 20172017
16
CH Planned maintenance and replacemnet of HVAC
Completed /ongoing year to year
16
Retro comission City building
PS and CH scheduled for 2017
16
CH heat tape installation
Complete 2016
16
Museum structural analysis of upper fa4ade
Complete 2017
16
Failed sash and glazing replacement
Scheduled to be complete 2017
16
MCH replace damaged and warn flooring at kitchen and entry
Complete 2017
112
220th St. SW Overlay from 76th Ave. W to 84th Ave. W
Completed in 2017
Citywide Signal Improvements
Upgrades to be addressed as part of future intersection improvements projects
228th St. Corridor Safety Improvements
X
Completed in 2017
112
238th St. SW Walkway from 100th Ave. W to 104th Ave. W
X
Completed in 2017
112
Hwy 99 Enhancement (Phase 3)
Completed in 2017
112
ADA Curb Ramps along 3rd Ave. S from Pine St. to Main St.
X
Completed in 2017
125
Meadowdale Playfields
Anticipated completion
125
Veteran's Plaza
Anticipated completion
125
FAC Bandshell
Anticipated completion
125
Audible Pedestrian Signals
Upgrades to be addressed as part of future intersection improvements project
126
Trackside Warning System
I X
lCompleted in 2017
126
Citywide ADA Transition Plan
I
lCompleted in 2017
421 2015 Replacement Program I lCompleted in 2016.
421 2016 Waterline Overlays I lCompleted in 2016.
Q
422 88th & 194th Study I lCompleted in 2016.
Page 3 of 5 Packet Pg. 266
423
2016 Sewerline Overlays
lCompleted in 2016.
423
2015 Sewerline Replacement
lCompleted in 2016.
423
6.A.c
M
N
O
N
0
O
C
O
N
�L
Q
E
O
U
d
U-
U
d
U
ni
H
t—
Q
r
c
m
E
t
c�
tv
r
w
Q
Page 4 of 5 Packet Pg. 267
UP / CIP COMPARISON (2017 TO 2018)
6.A.c
CHANGED PROJECTS
FUND PROJECT NAME I CFP I CHANGE
16
OPW container storage
Scheduled 2017
16
PW conference/Library carpet replacement
Completed 2017
16
Facilites Condition /planning report (Mckinstry Study)
Year one of three 2017
16
CH West first floor window waterproofing
Scheduled 2017
16
Museum Sylight replacement
Scheduled 2017
16
FS-16,17,20 Roll up door defeciencies rectified
Scheduled 2017
16
CH Electrical infrastructure replacement study
Scheduled 2018
16
Library Failed window units
Added to 2017 Capital Renewal Projects
16
PS failed window units
Added to 2017 Capital Renewal Projects
16
Library West deck water seal and repair parking ceiling
Estimate came in in excess of $170,000 will look for alternative options
16
FAC metal flashing replacement and repair
IState Capital funding was not approved
423.76
423.76
423.76
y
Q
Page 5 of 5 Packet Pg. 268
6.A.d
Changes from Previous Draft Presented on 10/11/17
CAPTIAL FACILITIES PLAN
No.
Pg
Project Name
Change
1
8
Civic Center Development
Amount decreased to zero in 2020
21
15 & 24
Highway 99 Gateway/Revitalization
Local fund amount decreased in
2019
3
17 & 41
Sunset Ave Walkway Project
Amounts increased in 2018
4
19 & 57
Railroad St. Sidewalk
Amounts adjusted in 2021 and
2022
51
19
SR104 @ Hwy 99 Multi -Use Path
Amounts adjusted in 2021 and
2022
6
21 & 69
Edmonds St. Waterfront Connector
Amounts adjusted in 2018
7
26
Main St. and 9th Ave
Amounts adjusted in 2018, 2021
and 2022
81
27
220th St. SW @ 76th Ave W Intersection Improvements
Amount increased in 2018
9
59
SR104 @ 76th Ave non -motorized transportation safety
improvements
Amounts increased in 2021 and
2022
10
71
Perrinville Creek High Flow Reduction/Management
Project
Amounts adjusted in 2018 and
2019
Capital Improvement Program
No.
Pg
Project Name
Change
Fund No.
1
9
Annual Street Preservation Program
Amount increased in 2018
112
2
9
76th Ave @212th St. Intersection Improvements
Amount increased in 2017 estimate
112
31
9
Main St. and 9th Ave
Amount increased in 2021
112
4
9
SR104@76th Ave Non -Motorized Transportation
Improvements
Amount increased in 2021
112
5
9
Edmonds St. Waterfront Connector
Amount increased in 2019
112
61
10
Contribution - General Fund for Annual Street Preservation
Program
Amount increased in 2018
112
7
10
(Federal) for 76th Ave@212th St. Intersection
Improvements
Amount decreased in 2017
estimate
112
8
10
(State) Edmonds St. Waterfront Connector
Amounts changed in 2018 and
2019
112
9
11
Railroad St. Sidewalk from Dayton St to Main St/SR104
Amounts decreased in 2022 and
2023
112
10
11
SR104@Hwy99 Multi -Use Path
Amounts decreased in 2022 and
2023
112
11
21
City-wide Drainage Replacement Projects
Amount increased in 2023
422
12
21
1 Lake Ballinger Associated Projects
lAmount incresed in 2023
422
131
23
12021 Sewer Replacement/Rehab/Improvements
JAmount increased in 2021
423
RA
hol
Q
Packet Pg. 269
9.A
Planning Board Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 10/25/2017
Planning Board Extended Agenda
Staff Lead: N/A
Department: Planning Division
Prepared By: Diane Cunningham
Background/History
N/A
Staff Recommendation
N/A
Narrative
The Board's current extended agenda is attached.
Attachments:
10-25-2017 PB Extended Agenda
Packet Pg. 270
ov. E pMo�
o Items and Dates are subject to change
N
PLAIR Wf BOARD
ARDD
Extended Agenda
October 25, 2017
Meeting Item
OCTOBER
Oct. 25 1. Public Hearing on the proposed 2018 — 2023 CIP / CFP
2. Five Corners Area —Development Feasibility Analysis —Status report
NOVEMBER
Nov. 8 1. Draft Urban Forest Management Plan (UFMP)
2. Parks & Recreation Quarterly / End of Year Report
3. Comp Plan Amendments Hearing
Nov.22 HOLIDAY
DECEMBER
Dec. 13 1. PB & ADB Joint meeting on roles & responsibilities
2. Housing Strategy Update (#2)
3. Five Corners Area —Development Feasibility Analysis —Final report
4. Election of 2018 Officers
Dec.27 HOLIDAY
9.A.a
Q
Packet Pg. 271
Items and Dates are subject to change
9.A.a
Pending 1. Community Development Code Re -Organization
2017 2. Neighborhood Center Plans and zoning implementation, including:
✓ Five Corners
3. Further Highway 99 Implementation, including:
✓ Potential for "urban center" or transit -oriented design/development
strategies
✓ Parking standards
4. Exploration of incentive zoning and incentives for sustainable
development
Current Priorities
1. Neighborhood Center Plans & implementation.
2. Highway 99 Implementation.
Recurring 1. Annual Adult Entertainment Report (January -February as necessary)
Topics 2. Election of Officers (VY meeting in December)
3. Parks & Recreation Department Quarterly Report (January, April, July,
October)
4. Quarterly report on wireless facilities code updates (as necessary)
Packet Pg. 272