2018-10-10 Planning Board Packeto Agenda
Edmonds Planning Board
snl. ynyo COUNCIL CHAMBERS
250 5TH AVE NORTH, EDMONDS, WA 98020
OCTOBER 10, 2018, 7:00 PM
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
3. ANNOUNCEMENT OF AGENDA
4. AUDIENCE COMMENTS
5. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS
A. Development Services Director Report
6. PUBLIC HEARINGS
7. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
8. NEW BUSINESS
A. Presentation of the Proposed 2019 - 2024 Capital Facilities Plan/Captial Improvement Plans
B. Moratorium on development of residential units without parking in BD zones
9. PLANNING BOARD EXTENDED AGENDA
A. Review Planning Board Extended Agenda
10. PLANNING BOARD CHAIR COMMENTS
11. PLANNING BOARD MEMBER COMMENTS
12. ADJOURNMENT
Edmonds Planning Board Agenda
October 10, 2018
Page 1
5.A
Planning Board Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 10/10/2018
Development Services Director Report
Staff Lead: Shane Hope
Department: Planning Division
Prepared By: Diane Cunningham
Background/History
N/A
Staff Recommendation
N/A
Narrative
The current report from Development Services Director Shane Hope is attached.
Attachments:
Director. Report. 10.05.18
Packet Pg. 2
5.A.a
Date:
To:
From:
Subject
MEMORANDUM
October 5, 2018
Planning Board
Shane Hope, Development Services Director
Director Report
A city is not gauged by its length and width,
but by the broadness of its vision and the height of its dreams.
(Herb Caen)
Next Planning Board Meeting
The Planning Board meets next on October 10 and will review the proposed 2019-2023 Capital
Improvement Program and long-term Capital Facilities Plan.
REGIONAL AND NATIONAL NEWS
Ferries Plan Open House
A long-range plan (thorough 2040) for the State's ferry system has been drafted. It is being
discussed around the region. On October 4t", a public open house was held in Edmonds to
provide more information.
The draft plan recognizes ferry ridership will increase and that new ferries, facilities, and
operational efficiencies will be needed. To review the draft plan, see:
http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/ferries/planning/long-range-plan/the-plan. Comments may be
provided to Washington State Ferries through October 25.
EnviroStars Program
EnviroStars, Washington's green business program, has helped more than 150 businesses
improve their sustainability during the program's first year across the region and state.
Participating businesses in Edmonds include the city's first certified green business, Walnut
Street Coffee. In the next several months, additional Edmonds businesses are likely to become
green certified through EnviroStars. Consumers can visit EnviroStars.org to find businesses of all
types that are committed to environmental values — whether they're looking for a brewery, auto
body shop, or insurance agency.
Packet Pg. 3
5.A.a
Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC)
❑ PSRC is encouraging public comment on a $6.4 billion draft regional Transportation
Improvement Program, with 377 projects underway in the region through 2022. The TIP
includes 124 projects that will receive about $533 million in PSRC funds. Over 70% of the
projects are for construction phases.
Small Cell Facilities
At both the national and state level, current technology for wireless communication is moving
toward "small cell" facilities that can be deployed in cities to improve wireless services. The
small cells —not surprisingly —are smaller in size than the more familiar macro cell towers that
serve as the backbone of the wireless industry. Typically, small cells are attached to utility poles
in the public rights -of -way and connect to fiber and power. The new facilities, while much
smaller, still have a visual impact and may add to the complexity of maintaining infrastructure in
the rights -of -way. Cities in our region are considering how to address the technology. We
expect that, after more research is done, a proposal for any potential amendments to the
Edmonds code will be brought forward to the Planning Board and City Council as part of a public
process.
LOCAL NEWS
Architectural Design Board (ADB)
The Architectural Design Board met on October 3. The agenda included:
❑ Discussion on the ADB's role in the design review process has grown out of several issues:
■ The Board has indicated that they have noticed less meaningful impact at the project -
review level. Projects are often completely 'designed' by the time they get to review it
and so only have the ability to offer input on minor details.
■ The City Council's has indicated their desire to see code changes that remove volunteer
boards like the ADB from the quasi-judicial decision -making process (Resolution 1367).
■ The Board has indicated an interest to do post -project reviews to see if the existing design
guidance and standards are resulting in the type of development envisioned for Edmonds
and, if not, propose refinements to the guidelines and standards.
Cemetery Board
The Cemetery Board meets next on October 18. The agenda includes,
❑ Officers for 2019
❑ Staff Reports on cemetery sales and burials, financial and other items
❑ Themes for 2019
❑ Walk Back in Time for teachers
❑ Memorial Day
❑ Satisfaction Survey
❑ Seeking two new members by 2019
2 1 P a g e
Packet Pg. 4
5.A.a
Diversity Commission
The Diversity Commission met on October 3, with an agenda that included:
❑ Grand Alliance Project discussion
❑ Update from the city
❑ Washington State Voting Rights Act
❑ Discussion on Closed Captioning in Public Venues
Economic Development Commission (EDC)
The EDC's next meeting is scheduled for October 17. An agenda will be posted online when
available.
Hearing Examiner
The next Hearing Examiner meeting is on October 11. Mietzner Brothers Properties, LLC has
applied for a unit lot subdivision at the 2441" Street project (eleven lots with a central access
tract). Permits for the eleven dwelling units and site improvements are currently under review
The site is at 8609, 8611 & 8615 244t" St SW and is zoned Residential Multifamily (RM-2.4).
Historic Preservation Commission (HPC)
The Historic Preservation Commission's next meeting is October 11. An agenda will be posted
online when available.
Tree Board
The Tree Board met on October 4. Its agenda included:
❑ Budget for October tree planting event
❑ Summer Market update
❑ Tree brochure update
❑ Options for partnering with the Mayors Climate Protection Committee
City Council
The City Council's September 25 meeting included:
❑ Public hearings on:
o Excelsior Place street vacation
o Continuation of moratorium on new residential units in BD zone without on -site
vehicle parking
o Critical areas update for wetland regulations
o Moratorium extension for crumb rubber athletic fields
❑ Approval of 2018 sewer replacement change order.
The October 2 meeting included:
❑ Presentations:
o Fire Prevention proclamation
o National Arts & Humanities Month proclamation
o Sister City Commission for 30th anniversary visit to Hekinan
o Snohomish County PUD on renewable energy credits pilot program
3 1 P a g e
Packet Pg. 5
5.A.a
❑ Public hearings:
o (Continuation for) Excelsior Place Street Vacation
❑ Permit Decision -making & Quasi -Judicial Processes
❑ Study items:
o Possible video -streaming of Council committee meetings
COMMUNITY CALENDAR
• October 1— November 2: Edmonds Scarecrow Festival. Information can be found at
www.historicedmonds.or�
• October 5: Write on the Sound writers' Conference, Frances Anderson Center, 9:30 am
• October 6: Raingarden Tour and Information Session, Park and meet on 3rd Ave. S. under
SR104 underpass in Edmonds, 10 am
• October 6: Last Summer Market of 2018
• October 18: September 20: Art Walk, Downtown, 5 pm
• October 31: Museum Haunted House, 5 — 7 pm
4 1 P a g e
Packet Pg. 6
8.A
Planning Board Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 10/10/2018
Presentation of the Proposed 2019 - 2024 Capital Facilities Plan/Captial Improvement Plans
Staff Lead: Rob English, City Engineer
Department: Planning Division
Prepared By: Diane Cunningham
Background/History
See Narrative below.
Staff Recommendation
Hold public hearing on October 24, 2018.
Narrative
The City's Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) Element is a document updated annually and identifies capital
projects for at least the next six years which support the City's Comprehensive Plan. The CFP contains a
list of projects that need to be expanded or will be new capital facilities in order to accommodate the
City's projected population growth in accordance with the Growth Management Act. Thus, capital
projects that preserve existing capital facilities are not included in the CFP. These preservation projects
are identified within the six -year capital improvement program (CIP) along with capital facility plan
projects that encompass the projected expenditure needs for all city capital related projects.
CIP vs. CFP
The CFP and CIP are not the same thing; they arise from different purposes and are in response to
different needs. While the CIP is a budgeting tool that includes capital and maintenance projects, tying
those projects to the various City funds and revenues, the CFP is intended to identify longer term capital
needs (not maintenance) and be tied to City level of service standards. The CFP is also required to be
consistent with the other elements (transportation, parks, etc.) of the Comprehensive Plan, and there
are restrictions as to how often a CFP can be amended. There are no such restrictions tied to the CIP.
The proposed 2019-2024 CFP is attached as Exhibit 1. The CFP has four project sections comprised of
General, Transportation and Stormwater. The proposed 2019-2024 CIP is attached as Exhibit 2. The CIP
has two sections related to general and parks projects and each project list is organized by the City's
financial fund numbers.
Following the Planning Board's public hearing and recommendation the City Council will also hold a
public hearing prior to final approval.
Attachments:
Exhibit 1: CFP Draft
Exhibit 2: CIP Draft
Packet Pg. 7
8.A
Exhibit 3: Comparison Matrix
Packet Pg. 8
8.A.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
U~�
2019-2024
�F� - EDP
St. 0
DRAFT
n,o
►Wi
Packet Pg. 9
8.A.a
N
C
d
r
C
d
E
d
O
L
Q
E
U
c
cv
d
m
r
v
O
U-
.Q
U
Iq
N
O
N
a
Packet Pg. 10
8.A.a
CFP
GENERAL
N
C
d
r
C
d
E
d
O
E
U
c
cv
d
A)
m
U-
.Q
U
Iq
N
O
N
a
Packet Pg. 11
8.A.a
N
C
d
r
C
d
E
d
O
L
Q
E
U
c
cv
d
m
r
v
O
U-
.Q
U
Iq
N
O
N
a
Packet Pg. 12
8.A.a
y
U
N
.O
LL a
U m
a m o
O d y N
E y � O
'a N N
W « C T
T lL m N
U � d
r C
'Q d
{fl
U
a
q
N
^
m
�
N
C
N
O
N
�
{vil
f9
W
N
N
a
N
� N
O rn O O ^
i0 O V O
M M O M O
p
OI
N
W
w
W
aWi >
`o
ro =
V'oi
E m
> o
m
w
itl w E O o f
O¢
U w o c `= F
!9 ¢
a F
>
s m
LL
a' (7
a O
U N
C'1
a
N O
O a0 O O W
o m o 0
O1 W
� O O M C
fA fR fA fR fA N
fR fA fR N
o
N
M ro o M
MM
E9 a N
3
n
c 7a W
a
m
v W W
a
0
V y ILM
d o
U
�j
Y
W r
a
W
O
¢
a
OU
7
'm
a c
o
>
9
a
a o O`
y
0
o>` O U
A
N
o
ro�-o o m
w9
a
M o d
o
t m
d x
n
A
E o
to �
c
a E
n E d
d a
0 0 n o
o E n
m a
n-
> of
N ro U o
of
AHro ro
Sro
¢n'
CO
m
d
n
O
M
v
ro
N
dy
E
oa
`m
z
m
o o
- o
d
0
E
d
y
`
ro
a`
o
Q
Y 2
N
�
a m
N
c
c
LL
o
o
E3
o
�o
()
U O
a
COI
Ci
O
M O M
O O
W n �
o,
O O b
M O O N
CM9 N O M NN n
aWi w
LL
w ro n g o
¢ (ry W
s m
`m ?
a a`
0 o ro rn
W 0^D Oo c W
rn o_
rn z ^
o E w
a (coJ
3
3 �
O Q
ir
W O - z L
O O W ro o W .. co
N m O w w itl N m U O
��y�O C E 'p_ C
Eoo E._E
mEU ^ W d ro _ > o - t ; o y �
U o n U^ s^ E'
n Etdo 'o
in rn� W e 0'3 o o c
o W d W c a
O W — 3: N W Lu
U a
m
Y
m
3
0
3d
E
o
W
d
ac c
� n
W E
m
3 coy
m
IL
r
c
m
E
m
0
L
0.
E
Ag
V
IL
0
A)
I.Y
V
N
O
N
CD
O
N
d
0
0
am
0
aL
d
0
r_
m
d
N
d
IL
CD
L
IL
U.
ci
r
r
t
x
w
C
t
v
m
r+
Q
Packet Pg. 13
8.A.a
N
C
d
r
C
d
E
d
O
L
Q
E
U
c
cv
d
m
r
v
O
U-
.Q
U
Iq
N
O
N
a
Packet Pg. 14
8.A.a
This page intentionally left blank
Packet Pg. 15
8.A.a
PROJECT NAME: Civic Center Development ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $11,750,000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Civic Center Development / Stadium Demolition.
Develop the recently adopted master plan for Civic Park, including demolition of the stadium.
Develop plan adding amenities and recreation components, restrooms to accommodate
increased growth.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Civic Center Development.
The acquisition and development of Civic Center is a high priority in the PROS plan.
SCHEDULE: 2018 - 2023
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT
COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Design
$1,000,000
Construction
$10,000,000
TOTAL
$11,000,000
8 Packet Pg. 16
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Community Park / Athletic ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $6-8 M
Complex at the Former Woodway High School
ra CIA HOGAN
HQm
t
rt II
y I —
w -
rC)R lER wOODWAY HIGH SCHOOL
ATHLETIC FIELD IMPROVEMENTS
PRE PAnto fOR THE E DMON DS SCHOOL DISH ICT
MAY FOV
8.A.a
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Develop community park and regional athletic complex with lighted
or unlighted fields and recreational amenities in partnership with Edmonds School District,
community colleges, user groups, and other organizations. Development dependent upon
successful regional capital campaign. $10m - $12M project for all 3 phases.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: The site is currently an underutilized and under maintained
facility with great potential as community multi -use active park. Site has existing controlled
access, greenbelt, parking and 4-court tennis facility with substandard fields. Highly urbanized
area with 150,000 residents within 5-mile radius. Future maintenance supported by user fees.
Phase 1 was completed in 2015 for $4.2M, Phases 2 & 3 will be completed in the future for an
additional $6-8M.
SCHEDULE: 2018-2038
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025-
COST
2038
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
Construction
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$6-8M
" all or a portion of this project may quality for 1 % for the Arts
9
Packet Pg. 17
a
8.A.a
PROJECT NAME: Parks & Facilities ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $3-$4 Million
Maintenance & Operations Building
Existing Building Outline
Yard Fu Mo
4
0
0
�,Ikw — 100
Ldading r New One
1, 00 Sf 6,600 Sf
Building
Driveway — 15,600—sf--
L)L--- --
Yard Functions � 11,910 If
Pedmeter zone — 4,200 Sf
Existing Fence Line
4
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The 40 year old maintenance building in City Park is reaching the
end of its useful life and is in need of major renovation or replacement.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Parks and Facilities Divisions have long outgrown this
existing facility and need additional work areas and fixed equipment in order to maintain City
parks and Capital facilities for the long term.
SCHEDULE: Contingent on finding additional sources of revenue from general and real
estate taxes.
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025-2038
Planning/Study
Eng. & Admin.
Construction
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$3m - $41nn
r
a
* all or part of this Project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts
10 Packet Pg. 18
8.A.a
PROJECT NAME: Waterfront Redevelopment ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $3,595,000
/ Waterfront Walkway Completion
•..•�� .1�C R�.�
� � _
� � o _
tAAOG�pi1� �.
.
�.
�"
r1N1d 11KAV
y ....
t rre.w x•,.
Ae,...e, R..., y
INV
o.ern+aor�.a
Pra00$44 FdrrrO+rti5
W nufrom Gan[er
�1
r�
sr�w5:
r �o. yer w w
. -:• .rx. �.� .ra+ nsr sc.ac..o.�wrr rr o. rr
r
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Work with Sr. Center to renovate surrounding park, parking lot
and walkway. Remove creosote pier, reintroduce habitat for fish and wildlife. Increase access
to the waterfront to accommodate increased growth. Connect waterfront walkway from
Brackett's Landing South to Olympic Beach, including completion in front of the Ebb tide
condominiums.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Provide anew Senior and Community Center and
provide a new beachfront walkway. One of the top priorities in the PROS plan is to open up
beach -front access.
SCHEDULE: 2018-2023
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Planning/Study
Eng. & Admin.
Construction
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$1,170,000
0
0
0
0
* all or part of this Project may qualify for 1% for the Arts
r
a
11 Packet Pg. 19
8.A.a
N
C
d
r
C
d
E
d
O
L
Q
E
U
c
cv
d
m
r
v
O
U-
.Q
U
Iq
N
O
N
a
12 Packet Pg. 20
8.A.a
CFP
TRANSPORTATION
N
C
d
r
C
d
E
d
O
E
U
c
cv
d
A)
m
U-
.Q
U
Iq
N
O
N
a
13 Packet Pg. 21
8.A.a
N
C
d
r
C
d
E
d
O
L
Q
E
U
c
tv
d
m
r
v
O
U-
.Q
U
Iq
N
O
N
a
14 Packet Pg. 22
8.A.a
LL u1
y C N
m
C S a N
y e o
a m o N
W of
° N
r LL a"
U c
m
m ~
U
N
Nty
O
N
S
<ti
13
Y3
YJ
Y3
S
S
S
S
N
S
S
8
�
Q
Q
Q
Q
�
S
S
oa b S
S
S
S
N
S
U
U
U
U
1.tE
o
sC5-
igs
S
O
olSQ,
Qa o
S S S
Qa S
-
N
S
R
2
S
2
H
H
H H
H H
H
S
o8
O
U
T.5
O
U
S S
N
y
_
oS
a&
g
8
8
8
a&
8
8
S&
y
S
O
N
y O
(p O
1
fp O
(p O
1
(p O
65 O
N O
6, m O
N O
(p O
N O
(pog ig O
~
y U F
~
w U H
~
� w° F
y° F
~
w° F
`
Ul ° F
w° F
`
y° F
w° F
y U F
`
O
-
N J
-
-
m
-
m
-
-
m
-
N
- °
E
-
m J
- °
m
- °
N
-
m
IL
S8
V
o°S
g 8
S S
IZ
-
-
- -
-
d a
�
U
()
U
(5J
U
(5J
U
(5J
U
(5J
U
C
m
� O
w
�
m
N 1
p
a
<
a
a
a
a
°' wm
a
a
a
a
1-2£
mm
^c
sg
3
a'o
m
mamof
�
'-
O
m
a
o
o
N
N
-
o S.
6
E 6
E°
m
E
tap n° Eo
.a
n
m .E
°L'�Bo
a
a
5 o�p1
Wr3il o.3
mm�y
.ov=$
m: n
oOa`
m�pb
`o
,+
`yQ
c
c°
c 3 0°
ip -
- E
Q�mim
�i,
E 3r �'
�2
N
'Sa
-nN
cEp
9Q
cE
sEE
�i 3h
sEs'
3^°.3
:s vrn9E
�i mm�h
9a°o
N�'o
g
EucEc
5dzd
c(pW
Uwu
WE'DE
r
o
'o
3
�N
o
tl
I
d
m
w
Q
L
v
am
��
c
-
y
-
N
�^
E
m
=
7
x
w E
w
y
3 E
w
y E
0
3
y
E
o
m
y Q
N i
N o
to E
a
°
qq
V
(djE
c7
5 E
S'
UE
go
-
IL
\
E
m E
m
m .4
u E
w2
mo
w'
w
¢'
o=
oa
N3
st
Y
xE
3T
xE
xE
3T
x
rc
w
2
1
ww
wE
15
Packet Pg. 23
8.A.a
LL u1
y C �
y
o S a N
y e o
a w o a
W o6
O N
r LL a"
U c
y
m f
U
o
N
«i
e
N
ci
N
t�
N�
$
ow
"oo
$
ow
N
O
N
N $
�
�
N
N
O
O
N
y
O
N
ol
'o
N
LL O
3
C
8
F
U J
_
N O
ol 1.
Wl I
w
'o t
U
(J
U
(J
U
(J
C
EU10
7
m
O
-
�
A
o
a
a
omN
°io
�93�3
a
oa
9B�c�
4
�E
�'m
W QYY.No
20
E w c ;
N
5o
_`'2
m
m
oE
¢
¢
oE
N
O
a
N
3
0
E
> .4
E
E
o
> .4
¢-ma
yE
O_
�ti
yE
yE
_
Oc
's
g
g
g
$
gi
$_
$
$
$
$
m $
_
=
li
O
li .�
N O
y 9 O
t
H
� Vl � H
� N .Z H
� y H
w
N$
Oy g
O»
o g
a
U
a
(J
a
U
a
(J
a
U
O
(7
O
(7
m
E
m�
�T4 �
u�iy
uitli Et
y
2
N
n
of
nN CW
a0
n';T
Nc
00o
Qta
o33
y
Q3o
.w
N
E"w
EN n�
E¢y
Ea3
a`E
3
3
y
3
`a
0
a
m
k
o
E
E
E
ai,
y z
3 v3i
Q
3 r3ii
y
m o
c in
4t
¢t
3
N N
N W
N 3
Q
16
Packet Pg. 24
8.A.a
LL u1
(i N
y C'
y
C S a N
y eO o
'a W N
W = , Ap 'm 0 O
LL a�
U c
y
W ~
U
c
m
IL
r
c
O
/
N
0
L
Q.
o
g
N
S
NHi
�n N
++
S8
SS
8
8
S88
8
N
o 8
o
Nw
M
M w
w 10H
i9
W
i9
V
S
S 8
S 8
8
S_ 8
8
88
N
W
8
N $
N tg
N
M
w
M
w
w
(9
w
^
li
�
N
N
1.�
LL
O
N
N
w!
L4
O
N
�
N
O
N
8
L
g&
&
&
8
&
8
&
8
g&
2
r
)
ai
m w
fn LL O
m m
N LL O
m m a
f9 m LL 0
N
m w
N LL O
m w
N LL O
m m
N LL O
m ii 3
(q O
m LL g
N O
w
(q LL O
ii 3
6 43 O
A
(9 � LL O
_
m ii 3
N� O
O
N
C
V
y F
o vg
rn F
o_
H
aqo
y F
o qo
y F
o qo
N F
o 0
y F
0
y F
o 0
y H
o vqo
y H
o 1.
y H
o qoo
y H
m 5
7ja15
LL
LL8
LL&
LL8
LL&
LL&
&
LL8
&
LL8
&
LL8
&
fA
0
0
N
00
0�
os
a
N ii
1 q,
_
NF
F»
w
wi
d'
w wi
xi
wi
xi wi
i+
0
Q
a
a
a
a
a
a
y N
ts
a
_
VC
or
2
0
lo
o
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
c
n
o x
'm
amw5
E
0 1
5
n
o�
0
cr
33Em
SQyE
sr
�yw
o
oQ
oN
y9_
c
.��
Ep
n02
o9
saw
.E
m
•i`i
G
y a
-
W
c
x
c_
x 0
y E
O
c N
x
y2 N?
e&
c o
a
o N y
3 2
.; 9 m
E
x 0 Oi
•/
a
sN
.E
o
—_m
&may
—�
W U
�Q o
—¢
m
b
mix
�Q
y c
—cam
Eo
w
�.�
—_
�N(D
m
m
o'f3n
min3
myo
mT
m�S=
Ea
o'a
�y—Sio
—SiE
1 En
d
2
6
d N
aC m oU
d3
d maN
Uiq
a1N
2'v4i
W o
d�a
L
2
a
a
3
_C3
o
o
3
a
v
o
E
o
o
o
LL
E
N
z o
¢
V
A
2
r
w
a
a.
x
7
y
¢
p
3 p
t
y
E
-
E
a
E
2
M
N
1�
a n
E
r
G
a
eEi
E
3
0
1'
E
Q
E
EE
y N
S c
Q
y3
E
E
Na
if
L
c3
m�
E
��
5'
.1
¢o2
Tnt
i�
¢3
W
c�
G
t
v
Q
17 Packet Pg. 25
8.A.a
ps
's
ps
's
ps
ps
O
N
C
O
N
N
O
N
g
-
N
O
N
S
tN
N
N
O
O
N
y
O
N
2
L
O
N
y 9 w 0
N w 0
65 m- O
N w 0
65 'S w 0
N w 0
65 m- O
C
8
U J
N- J
� N
O
Nii
N H
HM
S
�
H H pH
w
o t
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
U
(J
U
(J
U
(J
U
m t
�
O
a
c
p t3i1E
4
4m
o
:ymy
oTZ
4 i
¢
O
om
j
a
N o
x ro
x�
0 E
0 E
;�3
Eo
mE
y
y
n
3
s
y
3
p y
03:3:
i
m�
53
t3
mm�
o3 d
to
m
e�
2
a`N¢
33E
E
z
It
_
65
x
x
N
¢ a
E
E
o
E
E
E
a
�y
3r3n
3v3i
ran
y
3�
y3
55
¢t
at
y3
y3
a'o.
rla
N¢
N¢
.10
° L
Packet Pg. 26
8.A.a
PROJECT NAME: 228t" St. SW from Hwy. 99 ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $10,421,000
to 95t" PI. W
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Widen 228t" St. SW from Hwy. 99 to 95t" Pl. W to three lanes
(with two-way left turn lane), with curb and gutter, sidewalk, and bike lanes.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This project would improve pedestrian safety and traffic
flow along this corridor.
SCHEDULE: The design phase is scheduled to begin in 2023 (pending funding). These
project costs would be split between Snohomish County and Edmonds since half the project is
within Esperance.
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025-2039
Planning/Study
Engineering,
Administration, &
ROW
$75,000
$300,000
$1,200,000
Construction
$8,846,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$75,000
$300,000
$10,046,000
19 Packet Pg. 27
8.A.a
PROJECT NAME: 761h Ave W @ 2121h St. SW ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $7,700,000
Intersection Improvements
1
i
i
0
tUMUNUb-VVUUUVVHY
HIGH SCHOOL
man
W
a
R
L`
7301
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Add a northbound and southbound left -turn lane to convert the signal
operation for those approaches from split phasing to protected -permissive phasing. Add a right -turn
lane for the westbound, southbound, and northbound movements. The project also consists of
various utility upgrades and conversion of overhead utilities to underground.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Reduce the intersection delay and improve the existing level
of service to LOS C.
SCHEDULE: Substantial completion will be reached in October 2018 and the remaining Federal
documentation will be completed in 2019. Federal and State transportation grants were secured to
complete the different project phases (through CMAQ and TIB secured grants).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration &
ROW
Construction
$10,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$10,000
c
0
A
N
w
0
a
LL
U
x
w
c
E
a
20 Packet Pg. 28
8.A.a
PROJECT NAME: Highway 99 ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $175,000,000
Gateway/Revitalization
N
C
d
a�
E
a�
O
L
Q
E
U
c
cv
d
m
r
v
O
U-
.Q
U
Iq
N
O
N
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The project would include, among other features, wider replacement
sidewalks or new sidewalk where none exist today, new street lighting, center medians for access contro
0
and turning movements, etc., attractive and safe crosswalks, better stormwater management, targeted
o
utility replacements, potential undergrounding of overhead utilities, landscaping and other softscape
treatments to identify the area as being in Edmonds.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve aesthetics, safety, user experience, and access
a
management along this corridor. In addition, economic development would be improved.
c
SCHEDULE: The conceptual phase began in September 2017 and should be completed by November
.°
2018. The design phase for the stretch from 224t" St SW to 220t" St. SW is scheduled to begin in 2019
(pending additional funding). A HSIP grant application was submitted to fund a portion of the design /
ROW phases (pending response). $10M from Connecting Washington allocation has been secured, of
which $91VI isn't available until 2021.
o
COST BREAKDOWN
U-
PROJECT
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025-203�
COST
Planning/Study
Engineering &
$437,376
$1,540,000
$3,750,000
$2,000,000
$2,000,000
$16,000,OC
w
Administration
& ROW
E
Construction
$15,000,000
$13,000,000
$121,000,OC
1 % for Art
a
TOTAL
1 $437,376
$1,540,000
$3,750,000
$15,000,000
$15,000,000
$2,000,000
$137,000,0(
21 Packet Pg. 29
8.A.a
PROJECT NAME: Hwy. 99 @ 212th St. SW ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $2,806,000
intersection improvements
i
21 g sw I
i
w
W Paalung
s gn
shop
/
n
7313
P.U.B
3 Edmonds
Edmonds
/
W Family Clinic ei
Public 17-ks
ADX
KENNEL
21 1
27114 /
f Arbor
Q
2I /
P.
27109
R
n
lle Box /
/
212TH ST SW
7,.59RI
"3"2"
L
215THSTSW
PLANT
AEGIS
W SWEDISH
m MDNnSCAM— '
ALLIED /
ROOFING /
/
/
B&M /
CON ST
21414 /
21448 /
/
/
NCnONRLD'
/ 01
1ALUE /
PILLAGE /
16TH ST/SW
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Widen 21211 St. SW to add a westbound left turn lane for 200'
storage length and an eastbound left turn lane for 300' storage length. Provide protected left
turn phase for eastbound and westbound movements. (ROADWAY PROJECT PRIORITY in
2015 Transportation Plan: #4). The cost for the intersection improvements are included within
the Hwy. 99 Revitalization / Gateway project costs.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve intersection efficiency and reduce delay.
SCHEDULE: All phases are scheduled between 2022 and 2024 (unsecured funding).The
project cost is split between Lynnwood and Edmonds since half the project is within Lynnwood.
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Planning/Study
Engineering,
$175,000
$1,091,000
ROW, &
Administration
Construction
$1,540,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$175,000
$1,091,000
$1,540,000
r
a
22
Packet Pg. 30
8.A.a
PROJECT NAME: Hwy. 99 @ 216th St. SW ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $2,335,000
intersection improvements
2141021408w
c^
13�{
214021d12
21405
04
LU
N
U
2> 120L<
2i431MC�UHA6'
un
�
anz
150
r
215 AEGIS
21558
VA LU E
VILLAGE
ST
SVU
—
21BTlM
21600 {� 21619
KRUGER
CLINIC f
21632 � � -
��I16e
2
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Widen 216th St. SW to add a westbound left turn lane and an
eastbound left turn lane. Provide protected -permissive left turn phases for eastbound and
westbound movements. This project ranked #3 in the Roadway Project Priority in the 2015
Transportation Plan. The cost for the intersection improvements are included within the Hwy.
99 Revitalization / Gateway project costs.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve intersection efficiency and reduce delay.
SCHEDULE: All phases are scheduled between 2022 and 2024 (unsecured funding).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Planning/Study
Engineering &
ROW &
Administration
$204,000
$334,000
Construction
$1,837,000
1 %for Art
TOTAL
$204,000
$334,000
$1,837,000
r
a
23 Packet Pg. 31
8.A.a
PROJECT NAME: Hwy. 99 @ 220th St. SW ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $3,215,000
intersection improvements
TOP FOODS v �,
19TH sr SW /
21919 STARBU S /
/
220TH ST SW
I
I
I
I
1221
I
I
I
I
I
13
_I �
� l4
n
III
•0. 7301 W
U
O
e S
C m
.M.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Widen 220th St. SW to add Westbound right turn lane for 325'
storage length. Widen SR-99 to add 2nd Southbound left turn lane for 275' storage length.
(ROADWAY PROJECT PRIORITY in 2015 Transportation Plan: #2). The cost for the
intersection improvements are included within the Hwy. 99 Revitalization / Gateway project
costs.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Reduce intersection delay and improve traffic flow and
safety.
SCHEDULE: All Phases are scheduled between 2022 and 2024 (unsecured funding for all
phases).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
COST
-Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
& ROW
$175,000
$1,085,000
Construction
$1,955,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$175,000
$1,085,000
$1,955,000
24 Packet Pg. 32
8.A.a
PROJECT NAME: Hwy. 99 @ 234th St. SW ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $3,300,000
intersection improvements
ESPE&ANCE
' I3IiN �
FS
1 i711
21202
17
S-IMO PL W
ircn
�• �I 21]31
�33Rf1 Pt
] S'e 1'i L M1
1,03
1312 812: �
•71J7C'. _ — : i31'• !911 ]y0! 7731 !$
ff
-- �34TFS ST.SW _.—.
} l3 a'•• 3]406■�� 1 DIM ]l1 1 1712
1�
234f{7 r3111
wul
_ Y3U] € 7i.ti11'
131*1 ;salt nb
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install traffic signal at the intersection of Hwy. 99 @ 234t" St.
SW to provide safer crossing of Hwy. 99 for vehicles and non -motorized transportation
(project identified in Hwy. 99 Sub Area Plan). These intersection improvements are included
as part of the Hwy. 99 Revitalization / Gateway project. The cost for the intersection
improvements are included within the Hwy. 99 Revitalization / Gateway project costs.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve intersection safety and pedestrian conditions
along the corridor.
SCHEDULE: All Phases are scheduled between 2022 and 2024 (unsecured funding for all
phases).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration &
ROW
$300,000
$300,000
Construction
$1,200,000
$1,500,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$300,000
$1,500,000
$1,500,000
a
25 Packet Pg. 33
8.A.a
PROJECT NAME: 196th St. SW (SR-524) @ ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $903,000
88th Ave. W Intersection Improvements
1em
3
ILU
_
a_
.~a
I
m
:VEN DAY
WENTIST
:HURCH
4
1eeTM sr sw
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install traffic signal at the intersection
of 196th St. SW @ 88th Ave. W. The modeling in the 2009 Transportation Plan indicated that
restricting northbound and southbound traffic to right -turn -only (prohibiting left -turn and through
movements) would also address the deficiency identified at this location through 2025. This is
same alternative as one concluded by consultant in 2007 study but not recommended by City
Council. This could be implemented as an alternate solution, or as an interim solution until
traffic signal warrants are met. The ex. LOS is F (below City Standards: LOS D). This project
was ranked #6 in the Roadway Project Priority in the 2015 Transportation Plan.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve traffic flow characteristics and safety at the
intersection. The improvement would modify LOS to A, but increase the delay along 196th St.
SW.
SCHEDULE: All project phases are scheduled between 2022 and 2024 (unsecured funding).
In order to allow the installation of a traffic signal, the MUTCD traffic signal warrants must be
met and the installation must be approved by WSDOT (since 196th St. SW is a State Route /
SR-524).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Planning/Study
Engineering &
$193,000
$175,000
Administration
Construction
$535,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$193,000
$175,000
$535,000
26 Packet Pg. 34
8.A.a
PROJECT NAME: Main St and 9t" Ave. S ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $896,000
N
Q
x
J 91 MH--iI -—�,
BELL ST
UJ
a
I - �
P
MAIN ST
A WADE JAM ES
THEATER
� W�a
r
H
oavraN n
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Installation of a traffic signal or mini -roundabout.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: The existing intersection is stop -controlled for all
approaches and the projected intersection LOS in 2035 is LOS F (below the City's
concurrency standards: LOS D). The installation of a traffic signal would improve the
intersection delay to LOS B. The project ranked #4 in the Roadway Project Priority of the 2015
Transportation Plan. In Fall 2018, turn lanes will be added to the intersection to improve safety
and traffic flow through the intersection.
SCHEDULE: The design phase is scheduled to begin in 2019 (through local funds) and
construction in 2022 unsecured funding).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Planning/Study
Engineering,
$120,000
Administration
& ROW
Construction
$776,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$120,000
$776,000
27 Packet Pg. 35
8.A.a
PROJECT NAME: 7611 Ave. W @ 22011 St. SW ESTIMATED PROJECT COST:
Intersection Improvements $8,125,000
2,9rH sr sw
J
21919
J
J JI
3 14
IW
,a
r—i
i
J � �
2215TPLSW
ll!�U QIM
TOP FOODS
IsTARBILIll KS
J
220TH ST SW -
1
r
LYNWOOD
HONDA
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Reconfigure eastbound lanes to a left turn lane and through / right
turn lane. Change eastbound and westbound phases to provide protected -permitted phase for
eastbound and westbound left turns. Provide right turn overlap for westbound movement during
southbound left turn phase. (ROADWAY ROJECT PRIORITY #1 in 2015 Transportation Plan).
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Reduce the intersection delay and improve the LOS. The
projected LOS in 2035 would be improved from LOS F to LOS D.
SCHEDULE: A STP Federal grant was secured in 2018 for the Design Phase (funds not
available until 2021). The ROW phase is scheduled to be completed in 2022 and construction
in 2024 (pending additional funds).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Planning/Study
Engineering & ROW
$533,000
$892,000
Administration
Construction
$3,000,000
$3,700,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$533,000
$892,000
$3,000,000
$3,700,000
"All or a portion of this project may qualify for 1 % for the arts
Packet Pg. 36
8.A.a
PROJECT NAME: SR-104 @ 22611 St. SW / ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $194,000
15' St. SW Intersection Improvements
14TH WAY SW
226TH ST SW
uJ 226TH PL SW
M
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Extend the left turn lane for the westbound movement on SR-104.
Complete various pedestrian and bicycle intersection improvements. This project was
identified in the SR-104 Complete Streets Corridor Analysis (completed in 2015).
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve non -motorized transportation safety at the
intersection and improve traffic flow along the SR-104 corridor.
SCHEDULE: 2022-2023 (unsecured funding)
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration &
ROW
$30,000
Construction
$164,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$30,000
$164,000
a
29 Packet Pg. 37
8.A.a
PROJECT NAME: SR-104 @ 95t" PI. W ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $495,000
Intersection Improvements
W
H
r
ST S
a
CC
rn
cl
WESTGATE
CHAPEL
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Upgrade all ADA Curb Ramps; and add C-Curb for access
management. This project was identified in the SR-104 Complete Streets Corridor Analysis
completed in 2015).
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve intersection safety for pedestrians and vehicles.
SCHEDULE: 2022-2023 unsecured funding
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration &
ROW
$75,000
Construction
$420,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$75,000
$420,000
30 Packet Pg. 38
8.A.a
PROJECT NAME: SR-104 @ 238t" St. SW ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,338,000
Intersection Improvements
i
10
■
To Hwy 99
41�
239TH ST SW
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install traffic signal. The warrants are met for such an installation.
This project was identified in the SR-104 Complete Street Corridor Analysis (completed in
2015).
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve vehicular and pedestrian safety.
SCHEDULE: 2022-2023 unsecured funding)
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration &
ROW
$200,000
Construction
$1,138,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$200,000
$1,138,000
r
a
31
Packet Pg. 39
8.A.a
PROJECT NAME: Olympic View Dr. @ 76th Ave. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST:
W Intersection Improvements $1,183,000
N
SEAVIEW
PARK
3
PLSW
186TH ST SW
ml I m—I
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install traffic signal (the intersection currently stop controlled for
all movements). (ROADWAY ROJECT PRIORITY in 2015 Transportation Plan: #11).
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: The improvement will reduce the intersection delay. The
projected Level of Service is LOS F in 2035, which is below the City's concurrency standards
(LOS D). The project will improve the Level of Service to LOS B.
SCHEDULE: Engineering and Construction are scheduled between 2025 and 2039
(unsecured funding).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025-2039
Planning/Study
Engineering,
Administration,
& ROW
$200,000
Construction
$983,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$1,183,000
32 Packet Pg. 40
8.A.a
PROJECT NAME: 84th Ave. W (212th St. SW ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $15,441,000
to 238th St. SW)
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Widen 84th Ave. W to (3) lanes with curb, gutter, bike lanes, and
sidewalk on each side of the street. (part of this project was ranked #6 in the Long Walkway list of
the 2015 Transportation Plan).
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve overall safety of the transportation system along this
collector street: 1) the sidewalk and bike lanes would provide pedestrians and cyclists with their own
facilities and 2) vehicles making left turn will have their own lane, not causing any back-up to the
through lane when insufficient gaps are provided.
SCHEDULE: All project phases are scheduled between 2025 and 2039 (unsecured funding).
The project costs would be split between Snohomish County and Edmonds since half the project
is located within Esperance.
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025-2039
Planning/Study
Engineering,
$2,000,000
Administration,
& ROW
Construction
$13,441,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$15,441,000
all or part of this project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts.
33 Packet Pg. 41
8.A.a
PROJECT NAME: SR-104 @ 100t" Ave. W ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,017,468
Intersection Improvements / Access
Management
I
EDMONDS WAY
�% � MMI -a 0L I
r
NEI
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Implement Westgate Circulation Access Plan, install mid -block
pedestrian crossing along 100t" Ave. W, improve safety to access the driveways within
proximity to the intersection, and re -striping of 100t" Ave. W with the potential addition of bike
lanes. This project was identified in the SR-104 Completed Streets Corridor Analysis
completed in 2015).
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve access and safety at the intersection and
improve non -motorized transportation safety.
SCHEDULE: All phases are scheduled between 2022 and 2023 (unsecured funding)
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025-2039
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$150,000
Construction
$867,468
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$150,000
$867,468
r
a
34 Packet Pg. 42
8.A.a
PROJECT NAME: SR-104 @ 76t" Ave. W ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $3,017,000
Intersection Improvements
240iA PL SW . 74751 S1 sw
LT
11!!w'1l�iil�
I ietluvnLsw
�y LY4Y
ai F J
tp,J,ON05
LAKE BALLINGEA HAY— - — - —. — MP EMA(MI)S WAY
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Add a 2nd left turn lane along SR-104. This project was identified
in the SR-104 Complete Street Corridor Analysis (completed in 2015).
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve access and safety at the intersection and
improve non -motorized transportation safety.
SCHEDULE: 2025-2039. The project costs would be split between Shoreline and Edmonds
since half the intersection is located within Shoreline.
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025-2039
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$453,000
Construction
$2,564,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$3,017,000
35 Packet Pg. 43
8.A.a
PROJECT NAME: Olympic View Dr. @ 17411 St. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $610,000
SW Intersection Improvements
L+ 4 + — Meadowdale Middle School — — —
J-/, Parking L_
b 6WI St. Thomas Moore
—� a e
I Catholic School
B Ilfield
y
uarY
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Widen Olympic View Dr. to add a northbound left turn lane for 50'
storage length. Shift the northbound lanes to the east to provide an acceleration lane for
eastbound left turns. Install traffic signal to increase the LOS and reduce intersection delay.
(ROADWAY ROJECT PRIORITY in 2015 Transportation Plan: #13)
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve intersection efficiency and safety of drivers
accessing either street.
SCHEDULE: Engineering and Construction are scheduled between 2025 and 2039
(unsecured funding).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025-2039
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$100,000
Construction
$510,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$610,000
r
a
36 Packet Pg. 44
8.A.a
PROJECT NAME: Sunset Ave Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $3,050,000
from Bell St to Caspers St.
♦ ♦ �� I■� 11111■0 I
� ���' IIIIIII :�1■�■1 ■
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Provide a walkway on the west side of the street, facing
waterfront (— 112 mile / more recent project).
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: To provide a safe and desirable walking route.
SCHEDULE: Temporary improvements were installed in 2017 through striping, in order to
evaluate the alignment of the proposed walkway and parking alternatives The design phase
is scheduled to be completed in 2022. Construction isn't scheduled to occur until 2023 when
utility improvements are scheduled to be completed along this stretch. No grant funding has
been secured for the construction phase.
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
COST
Planning/Study
Engineering &
$295,000
Administration
Construction
$2,595,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$295,000
$2,595,000
* all or part of this project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts.
r
a
37 Packet Pg. 45
8.A.a
PROJECT NAME: 23211d St. SW Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,305,000
from 100th Ave. W to SR-104
EDMONDS WAY
W SAME
iwnRs
LLI
L !
Ell
2 .
■ ■ Qy -
1
�i
IF Al. 10
UUT H '
CHURCH, (jr
■ ■
■ , Uj
7 , ■
AW �I
o
�0 c� 2
ODW' ' I ESTATES AY OLy I _ PR
RK
\29 9 Dorn 98 7 6 5
' 30 2 15
3 14 7•
J \32 45 32
■ r
jr
r
`2q
7 1
nm (0)
1 � ■ � e
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk along 232nd St. SW from 100th Ave. W to SR-104.
This project ranked #3 in the Long Walkway List of 2015 Transportation Plan.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This project would improve pedestrian safety.
SCHEDULE: 2023-2024 (unsecured funding)
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$200,000
Construction
$1,105,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$200,000
$1,105,000
a
Packet Pg. 46
8.A.a
PROJECT NAME: 2361" St. SW Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,395,000
from Madrona Elementary to 97t" Ave. W
S
Q
1t
2j=
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk with curb and gutter along 236nd St. SW from
Madrona Elementary to 97t" Ave. W. This project ranked #4 in Long Walkway list of the 2015
Transportation Plan.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This project would improve pedestrian safety.
SCHEDULE: 2022-2023 (unsecured funding)
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$213,000
Construction
$1,182,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$213,000
$1,182,000
r
a
39 Packet Pg. 47
8.A.a
PROJECT NAME: 84th Ave. W Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $585,000
From 238th St. SW to 234th ST. SW
L
PARK
EonnoNos SAL GALLL
APTS m
w
w LL
CH RIST LNTH E RAN CH N RCH O
PARK
& RIDE
OFFICE
236:1 4SUHSET
23603 SAFEWAY $23605 WH L KJIHG R23607 23619 0
P
���R AURORAS MARKETPLACET
N
239TH ST SW
W SEOUL
23821 PLAZA
2
23827
TRAVEL LODGE
0"
NORTH
ry HAVEN z
n MANOR w
a �
R p
r~ }
n•1L LO'N
13ROCK
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk along 84th Ave. W from 238th St .SW to 234th St.
SW, with curb and gutter. This project ranked #5 in the Long Walkway List of the 2015
Transportation Plan.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This project would improve pedestrian safety.
SCHEDULE: Begin design in 2024 (unsecured funding)
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025-2039
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$90,000
Construction
$495,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$90,000
$495,000
c
0
A
w
0
IL
LL
U
x
w
r
c
as
E
a
Packet Pg. 48
8.A.a
PROJECT NAME: 801h Ave. W Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,199,000
from 206th St. SW to 212th ST. SW
I
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk along 80th Ave. W from 206th St. SW to 212th St.
SW with curb and gutter. This project ranked #1 in Long Walkway List of the 2015
Transportation Plan.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: The improvements will improve non -motorized
transportation safety including for school kids due to proximity of several schools).
SCHEDULE: 2022-2023 (funding unsecured).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration &
ROW
$200,000
Construction
$999,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$200,000
$999,000
41
Packet Pg. 49
8.A.a
PROJECT NAME: 2nd Ave. S Walkway from ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $30,000
James St. to Main St.
4t
3�
<1 NG
4
►.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Construct a missing link of sidewalk (approximately 100') on
2nd Ave. S between Main St. and James St. (Ranked #2 in Short Walkway Project list in
2015 Transportation Plan).
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: To provide a safe and desirable walking route.
SCHEDULE: 2022
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT
COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
Construction
30,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$30,000
* all or part of this project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts
Q
42 Packet Pg. 50
8.A.a
PROJECT NAME: 21811 St. SW Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,305,000
from 76th Ave. W to 84th Ave. W
■■■■N� ���■■
mom
r-
�A ■■
oil
OENT ER
Ira&,
U1
E
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk along 218th St. SW from 76th Ave. W to 84th Ave.
W with curb and gutter. This project ranked #2 in Long Walkway List of the 2015
Transportation Plan.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: The improvements will improve pedestrian safety.
SCHEDULE: 2023-2024 unsecured funding
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration &
ROW
$200,000
Construction
$1,105,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$200,000
$1,105,000
a
43 Packet Pg. 51
8.A.a
PROJECT NAME: Walnut St. Walkway from 3rd ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $105,000
Ave. S to 4t" Ave. S
ARTS
W ENTER
a
Z UNDOW NEI
N
ALDER
ALDER ST
346
414 412 410
arking
5
5
LA
UJ
o SOUND VIEW
o:
HOWELL WAY
W
a
x
v
DAYTON ST
tMILLTOWN
MAPLE ST
RICC
ALDER ST
N
W
a BECK'S
z
BAN K
T-
409 530Pancak
407 540 Hau s
4003 546 0
401 w
a
WALNUT Sr
--F
GREGORY
e
H
525
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Construct a missing link of sidewalk (approximately 350') on
Walnut St. between 3rd Ave. S and 4t" Ave. S (ranked #3 in Short Walkway Project list in 2015
Transportation Plan).
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: To provide a safe and desirable walking route.
SCHEDULE: Engineering & Construction scheduled for 2022 (unsecured funding).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$10,000
Construction
$95,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$105,000
all or part of this project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts
44 Packet Pg. 52
8.A.a
PROJECT NAME: 216th St. SW Walkway from ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $157,000
Hwy. 99 to 72nd Ave. W
21400 �
JJ
7200 B&M
PARK & RIDE CONS
S0T7V30I9
MAN J
w 21410 21408 0.
o � 21401 �
M1 2140
021412 v
U v
214G7
�507
W �
w � W /
21511 j
`
{
M DONAL6'
IL y
21431 .r
p I N
rn
21521
N Ilk
0
M STEVEN
T
21500
AEGIS 215587
E
VALUE
VILLAGE
21 B TH
ST Z IW
16 TJ1
120
:VEN5
tILION
21600 { 21619 ci'
KRUGER *Aq
CLINIC , .01
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install 150' sidewalk on north side of 216th St. SW from Hwy. 99 to
72nd Ave. W (completing a missing link on north side of stretch). This project ranked #3 in the
Short Walkway List (from 2015 Transportation Plan).
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: To provide a safe and desirable walking route.
SCHEDULE: Engineering & Construction scheduled for 2022 (unsecured funding).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$30,000
Construction
$127,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$157,000
* all or part of this project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts
r
a
45 Packet Pg. 53
8.A.a
PROJECT NAME: 238th St. SW Walkway from ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $712,000
Hwy. 99 to SR-104
i
1
L
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Ranked #10 in Long Walkway list from 2015
Transportation Plan. Install 7' sidewalk on the north side of 238th St. SW.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve pedestrian safety along that stretch
and creating safe pedestrian connection between Hwy. 99 and 76th Ave. W.
SCHEDULE: The construction phase began in May'18 and was completed in
August '18. Documentation will be completed in 2019. A TIB grant was secured to
fund the design and construction phases.
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
Construction
$5,750
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$5,750
* all or part of this project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts.
46 Packet Pg. 54
8.A.a
PROJECT NAME: 238th St. SW Island and ADA ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $251,850
Curb Ramps
t
LYE+I
-Tij J F1'
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Reconstruct the island on the west side of SR-104
@ 238th St. SW to provide an ADA compliant path and installation of ADA
compliant curb ramps at Walnut St. @ 6th Ave. S, Walnut St. @ 7th Ave. S, and
Alder St. @ 7th Ave. S.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve pedestrian safety along this island
and along several other stretches throughout the City..
SCHEDULE: The design began in 2018 and construction is scheduled to be
completed in 2019.
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
Construction
$251,850
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$251,850
* all or part of this project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts.
47 Packet Pg. 55
8.A.a
PROJECT NAME: Elm Way Walkway from ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $830,000
8t" Ave. S to 9t" Ave. S
4
�^
I
1
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk along Elm Way from 8t" Ave. S to 9t" Ave. S. This
project ranked #6 in the Short Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: This project would improve pedestrian safety.
SCHEDULE: 2022-2023 (funding unsecured). A Safe Routes to School grant was submitted
in April 2018 to fund the design and construction phases (pending response).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$175,000
Construction
$655,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$175,000
$655,000
r
a
48 Packet Pg. 56
8.A.a
PROJECT NAME: Maplewood Dr. Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,591,000
from Main St. to 2001h St. SW
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Construct sidewalk on Maplewood Dr. from Main St. to 200th St.
SW (- 2,700'). A sidewalk currently exists on 200th St. SW from Main St. to 76th Ave. W,
adjacent to Maplewood Elementary School (rated #18 in the Long Walkway list of the 2015
Transportation Plan).
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Create pedestrian connection between Maplewood
Elementary School on 200th St. SW and Main St., by encouraging kids to use non -motorized
transportation to walk to / from school.
SCHEDULE: Engineering scheduled for 2022 and construction in 2023 / 2024 (funding
unsecured). A Pedestrian and Bicycle Program grant application was submitted in 2018 to fund
the design phase (response pending).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Planning/Study
Engineering &
$230,000
Administration
Construction
$681,000
$680,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
230,000
$681,000
$680,000
* all or part of this project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts.
49 Packet Pg. 57
8.A.a
PROJECT NAME: Dayton St Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $252,500
between 7t" Ave. S and 8t" Ave. S
FMONM 5f S2 UM-11 Si
a
- IIUSi- -
e 1 l�li�t Ia�l iYi
b
0 r1ol 07
Q---------------- M '=- Fm
MAIM S7
�: • -- .T �-ice � �I '���11 I�,�
--------------------- _ ki 1�N.. d rr
-_a ■: OMAN-11fi l
011' I01t0141
L�
a
AMOSi�
WALNuT SI
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Construct a missing link of sidewalk Dayton St. between 7tn
Ave. S and 8t" Ave. S and additional sidewalk improvements along the rest of the stretch
(ranked #1 in Short Walkway Project list in 2015 Transportation Plan).
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: To provide a safe and desirable walking route.
SCHEDULE: Construction is scheduled for 2019 (as part of the Dayton St. Utility
Improvements project). A Complete Streets grant is reasonably expected to be secured in
2019 to fund the construction of this project.
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT
COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
Construction
$252,500
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$252,500
* all or part of this project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts.
a
50 Packet Pg. 58
8.A.a
PROJECT NAME: 95th PI. W Walkway from ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $585,000
224th ST. SW to 220th St. SW
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk along 95th PI. W from 224th ST. SW to 220th ST.
SW, with curb and gutter. This project ranked #8 in the Long Walkway List of the 2015
Transportation Plan.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This project would improve pedestrian safety.
SCHEDULE: Engineering scheduled for 2022 and construction in 2023 (funding unsecured).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$100,000
Construction
$485,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$100,000
$485,000
51 Packet Pg. 59
8.A.a
PROJECT NAME: Railroad Ave. Sidewalk from ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $862,000
Dayton St. to SR-104
bt.
4fi
P❑�tio-� W NAY TON 5T
a
? Fo
�ONn.
ea a
4k
D,SYTON ST
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install new and wider sidewalk along Railroad St. from
Dayton St. to SR-104.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve non -motorized transportation safety along
Railroad St. from Dayton St. to SR-104, key stretch since connects to various destination
points such as Senior Center, Port of Edmonds, Downtown Edmonds... .
SCHEDULE: All Phases are scheduled in 2022 and 2023 (unsecured funding for all
phases).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration &
ROW
$160,000
Construction
$702,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$160,000
$702,000
r
a
52 Packet Pg. 60
8.A.a
PROJECT NAME: SR-104 @ 76th Ave. W non- I ESTIMATED PROJECT COST:
motorized transportation safety improvements $1,210,000
mr—
Ra In a.
IqN r� w
MS.
-V
�.m9 ka,,rd1795 WAY aFFRq .. _
LAKE 8At LINGER WRIT-- - - -- - - - Tio MONO WAY
PLO
a
,.fir
r s� sw
zr
Nla
V ,
--�dND5
RFLIIVF
LAKi iiAL1.IN
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Extend bike lanes within proximity of the intersection in
northbound and southbound directions. Install APS on all corners and new ADA curb ramps.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve non -motorized transportation safety along this
section of the Interurban Trail.
SCHEDULE: All Phases are scheduled in 2022 and 2023 (unsecured funding for all
phases). This intersection is shared with Shoreline and they own the traffic signal.
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration &
ROW
$224,000
Construction
$986,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$224,000
$986,000
r
a
53 Packet Pg. 61
8.A.a
PROJECT NAME: 191th St. SW Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $630,000
from 80th Ave. W to 76th Ave. W
1�
192ND PL 5W
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk along 191th St. SW from 80th Ave. W to 76th Ave.,
with curb and gutter. This project ranked #8 in Long Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation
Plan.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This project would improve pedestrian safety.
SCHEDULE: 2025-2039
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025-2039
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$90,000
Construction
$540,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$630,000
54 Packet Pg. 62
8.A.a
PROJECT NAME: 10411 Ave. W Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $990,000
from 238th St. SW to 106th Ave. W
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk along 104th Ave. W from 238th ST. SW to 106th
Ave. W, with curb and gutter. This project ranked #10 in the Long Walkway List of the 2015
Transportation Plan.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This project would improve pedestrian safety.
SCHEDULE: 2025-2039
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025-2039
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$150,000
Construction
$840,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$990,000
55 Packet Pg. 63
8.A.a
PROJECT NAME: 801h Ave. W Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $315,000
from 218th St. SW to 220th St. SW
a
2
ey
00
L
5TEVE
ft
K
a
H
n
n
----- 77T---------------220THSTSW—
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk along 80th Ave. W from 218th ST. SW to 220th ST.
SW, with curb and gutter. This project ranked #7 in the Short Walkway List of the 2015
Transportation Plan.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This project would improve pedestrian safety.
SCHEDULE: 2025-2039
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025-2039
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$55,000
Construction
$260,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$315,000
56 Packet Pg. 64
8.A.a
PROJECT NAME: 841h Ave. W Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $315,000
from 188th St. SW to 186th St. SW
Sw ��lUJ
ucq�
Wr ri186TH ST W
i
■-d6
9P'`
`
,7
��
■
w
F■
i-�
--. r
■
18 TH
5 5W
■
i s
-
F
A
z�BrN
5
r5w
L 1
r 1 l -■
�- I, I SFAMFW
!u � 0 � I - � �E, �-Er- Y"
I
-a-
°r
,
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk along 84th Ave. W from 188th St. SW to 186th St.
SW., with curb and gutter. This project ranked #5 in Short Walkway List of the 2015
Transportation Plan.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This project would improve pedestrian safety.
SCHEDULE: 2025-2039
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025-2039
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$60,000
Construction
$255,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$315,000
a
57
Packet Pg. 65
8.A.a
PROJECT NAME: 2361h St. SW Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $765,000
from Hwy 99 to 76th Ave. W
rM bI III -.P%
PARK
& RIDE
236TH ST SIN_
23601
23603 SAFE'
23605 L K.
23607 NON
0
W
Q
X Id
1
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk along 236th St. SW from Hwy 99 to 76th Ave. W.
This project ranked #10 in Long Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This project would improve pedestrian safety.
SCHEDULE: 2025-2039
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025-2039
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$115,000
Construction
$650,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$765,000
58 Packet Pg. 66
8.A.a
PROJECT NAME: 23811 St. SW Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,170,000
from Hwy 99 to 76th Ave. W
1
PARK
r
.•nrIRL
NA LN
'
, ■ '
EOMONOs
APTS
BALL
' •
•
1
��r�
W
w
Ov
NORTH
m
CH RIST LH THE RAN CHURCH
S
N
PARK
�.
a
& RIDE
R
n -
2
TH T
OFFICE
■
d `�
,4
,
W
r
SAFEWAY
�
L KJIHG
FC,�
I
'
L • .
SUNSET
•n•1L LO•n�
CEj
BROOK
■
AURORA-
MARKETPLACE
FAMILYPANCAKEr
j7'
1 ■
238TH ST SW
"'
■
■
■
23821
seouL
PLAZA
'
■ ►
1
23827,
TRAVEL
LODGE
2397 ■
-MISISON TACO TIM
■
ST. FRA NCIS
MOTEL
WHSE ■
. .
.
- ■
■ ■
_+
K&EMOTEL
1
1
■
■
RARI. F
1 ■
■ ■
■♦
,
IN
■
■
:yA
C�)
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk along 238th St. SW from Hwy. 99 to 76th Ave. W
This project ranked #10 in Long Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This project would improve pedestrian safety.
SCHEDULE: 2025-2039
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025-2039
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$175,000
Construction
$995,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$1,170,000
a
59 Packet Pg. 67
8.A.a
PROJECT NAME: 801h Ave. W / 180th St. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,506,000
SW Walkway from 188th St. SW to OVD
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk along 80th Ave. W from 188th St. SW to OVD. This
project ranked #13 in Long Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This project would improve pedestrian safety.
SCHEDULE: 2022-2023 (unsecured funding). A Safe Routes to School grant application was
submitted in April 2018 to fund the design and construction phases (pending response).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025-2039
Planning/Study
Engineering, ROW,
& Administration
$315,000
Construction
$1,191,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$315,000
$1,191,000
60 Packet Pg. 68
8.A.a
PROJECT NAME: 189th PI. SW Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $585,000
from 80th Ave. W to 76th Ave. W
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk along 189th PI. SW from 80th Ave. W to 76th Ave.
W. This project ranked #14 in Long Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This project would improve pedestrian safety.
SCHEDULE: 2025-2039
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025-2039
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$115,000
Construction
$470,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$585,000
61 Packet Pg. 69
8.A.a
PROJECT NAME: Ferry Storage ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $357,000
Improvements from Pine St. Dayton St.
5�
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Modify existing lane channelization on SR104 to add vehicle
storage for ferry users.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Reduce conflicts between ferry storage and access to
local driveways.
SCHEDULE: 2022 (unsecured funding)
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$50,000
Construction
$307,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$357,000
62 Packet Pg. 70
8.A.a
PROJECT NAME: Edmonds Street Waterfront ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $29,885,000
Connector
.{
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This project builds a grade -separated overcrossing over the railroad
tracks as an extension of Edmonds Street connecting to Brackett's Landing north park (project
identified in Edmonds Waterfront Alternatives Access Study completed in 2016).
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Provide access for emergency vehicles, pedestrians, and
bicycles. The overpass could be utilized to offload passenger vehicles from a ferry during an
extended closure of the railroad track crossings.
SCHEDULE: 2019-2022. A State Appropriation for $700,000 was secured in 2017. In 2018, an
additional State Appropriation for $6,000,000 was secured. BUILD, FMSIB, TIGER, FASTLANE,
and Pedestrian and Bicycle Program grants were submitted in 2018 to fund the remaining costs to
complete the project (pending response). In 2019, RCO and Ecology grants will be submitted.
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025-203f
COST
Planning/Study
Engineering &
$3,000,000
$3,500,000
Administration
Right of Way /
$12,000,000
$9,000,00
Environment
Mitigation
Construction
TOTAL
$3,000,000
$3,500,000
$12,000,00
$9,000,000
r
a
63 Packet Pg. 71
8.A.a
N
C
d
r
C
d
E
d
O
L
Q
E
U
c
tv
d
m
r
v
O
U-
.Q
U
Iq
N
O
N
a
64 Packet Pg. 72
8.A.a
CFP
U
c
tv
d
STORMWATER
m
U-
N
O
N
a
65 Packet Pg. 73
8.A.a
N
C
d
r
C
d
E
d
O
L
Q
E
U
c
tv
d
m
r
v
O
U-
.Q
U
Iq
N
O
N
a
66 Packet Pg. 74
a
LL
U m
� d _
r
o
E N a o
-U y N
W ' m
= R .0 3 N
T LL E v
V � o
•Q N
R
U
o0 00
O O N N
N
O O O O
O O N N
�.•� N N N N
O
N
O O N O N
0o aNrn
N n n O W N N U3 V) NfAN
N � �
Oy O O O O
O O O O
6? fR
O O O O
O V
N
O O O O O O N N
O O O O O O
O O O r N n n n
p N N W O E9 E9 fA fA
N d3 fA d3 �
J d) J J d)
V U N lL U N d� U N LL
j N C� N C td N C B
in
EF �ulv�f Sul EF
O o
i o in 'o oo in
� aaiv� dv� dvo
LL N � LL d) LL dl
0
N U O 000 00 V (NOO
Of n! V O'.N 6
IOf1 430(NO4
Of
d
.O � T
y a p rn cn
U
T p p
m t m
0
C- � C7 i2
cc Tcs
Q T Q (n 2 O d)
cC7 c� OM om
c� ULL ¢a° wao
c
N > ca
rn �
o
N
U L X O
J N
L a dN
3
� T N U
6 J
O U E
N «
w CC o o N
d U O d t
U N « U
p N j
a o m
d 3o c o o
OCb r w O L U
d1
N O d
N r C E
O C
O C i d o L O d
U 2 ld d]
2
N L O O
OmEi N
- � w E
'a0 N O C O tV
Q C p (n lL N L
N i
N U
E N °
df p o cL
Z 7 C EL C O
W T a O E
1 a N p d d] Y
n E d o a
C
ma � d d a10i
p 3 a c[ (n
67
8.A.a
Packet Pg. 75
8.A.a
N
C
d
r
C
d
E
d
O
L
Q
E
U
c
cv
d
m
r
v
O
U-
.Q
U
Iq
N
O
N
a
68 Packet Pg. 76
8.A.a
PROJECT NAME: Dayton St and Hwy 104 ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $2.41VI
Drainage Improvements
184 /X
/ \170 _
GJ �200 200
_4qp
Egmo w�Sl -?q�,l 146� Qcw
a -W3
r Ha
z a
LULU c
F N
f!3 3 a r
JA
R _P30
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Add lift station in the Beach Place parking lot and other new
stormwater infrastructure.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: To reduce flooding at the intersection of Dayton St and
State Hwy 104.
SCHEDULE: Construction scheduled for 2019.
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT
COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Planning/Study
Eng. & Admin.
$23,000
Construction
$1,884,000
1 % for Art
$15,000
TOTAL
$1,922,000
r
a
69 Packet Pg. 77
8.A.a
PROJECT NAME: Willow Creek Daylighting ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $5M to $10M
Edmonds Marsh as seen from the viewing platform.
Previously restored section of Willow Creek. Source:
www.unocaledmonds.info/clean-up/gallery.php
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Building on the studies completed in 2013 and 2015 that assessed the
feasibility of daylighting the Willow Creek channel, this project will likely construct a new tide gate and
1,100 linear ft of new creek channel lined with an impermeable membrane. Funds will be used for
design and construction but exact breakdown cannot be assessed at this time.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: The daylighting of Willow Creek will help reverse the negative
impacts to Willow Creek and Edmonds Marsh that occurred when Willow Creek was piped in the early
1960s. This project will provide habitat for salmonids, including rearing of juvenile Chinook. This project,
along with its companion CIP projects "Edmonds Marsh Channel Improvements" and "Dayton Street
Pump Station," will also help reduce the flooding problem at the intersection of SR-104 and Dayton
Street.
SCHEDULE: Actual schedule dependent on available funding.
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Planning/Study
Eng. & Admin.
$75,000
$940,000
$675,000
$75,000
$75,000
$75,000
Construction
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$75,000
$940,000
$675,000
$75,000
$75,000
$75,000
70 Packet Pg. 78
8.A.a
PROJECT NAME: Perrinville Creek High Flow ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $21VI to $10M
Reduction/Management Project
ue �d
172 n
y 4
°' 173 d
T31t]Ot
PerrinvilleN„
Frederick
Creek
th
ti
M
77t 1 7 h
78th
79th
a
Z
H
180
1 Oth c°7o
h `m
181s
2nd
18 nd 4`
c
a1 M
00
M
M
185th °O
85th
o
u* N
87th
18 h
r
Perrinville Creek Channel illustrating the channel incision
that will be addressed by restoration.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A flow reduction study for the Perrinville Creek basin was
completed in 2014. This study recommended a number of flow control and water quality
projects to improve the conditions in Perrinville Creek. The City applied for and won a grant
from the Department of Ecology for $633,750 to design and construct a stormwater infiltration
facility in Seaview Park. This facility is being constructed and will be completed by the end of
2018. The dollars allocated in the out years are to implement additional water quality and flow
control projects in the Perrinville Creek basin as recommended by the Flow Reduction Study.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Urbanization of the Perrinville Creek Basin has increased
flows in the creek, incision of the creek, and sedimentation in the low -gradient downstream
reaches of the creek. Before any habitat improvements can be implemented, the flows must be
controlled or these improvements will be washed away.
SCHEDULE: Construction at Seaview park taking place in 2018. Other open sites to be
determined in the future.
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
COST
Planning/Study
Eng. & Admin.
$10,000
$125,000
$125,000
$12,500
$12,500
$12,500
Construction
$65,000
$510,450
1% for Art
$1,125
TOTAL
$76,125
$126,250
$126,250
$12,500
$12,500
$12,500
r
a
71 Packet Pg. 79
8.A.a
N
C
d
r
C
d
E
d
O
L
Q
E
U
c
cv
d
m
r
v
O
U-
.Q
U
Iq
N
O
N
a
72 Packet Pg. 80
8.A.b
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
2019-2024
� OF EDP
KWA
Packet Pg. 81
8.A.b
c
FL
c
a�
E
m
O
L
CL
E
CL
U
c
IL
d
U.
Q
U
N
O
N
CD
O
N
N
N
O
CL
O
L-
a.
a�
z
O
c
O
c
a�
m
L
IL
L
a_
U
N
t
K
W
r-�
C
d
E
t
c�
R
r
Q
Packet Pg. 82
8.A.b
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (2019-2024)
Table of Contents
GENERAL
112
Transportation
Public Works
7
125
Capital
Projects Fund
Parks & Recreation/
Public Works
10
126
Special Capital /
Parks Acquisition
Parks & Recreation/
Public Works
12
332
Parks Construction
(Grant Funding)
Parks & Recreation
14
421
Water Projects
Public Works
16
422
Storm Projects
Public Works
17
423
Sewer Projects
Public Works
19
423.76
Waste Water
Treatment Plant
Public Works
20
PARKS — PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS
Capital
Parks & Recreation/
125
Projects Fund
Public Works
23
Special Capital /
Parks & Recreation/
126
Parks Acquisition
Public Works
51
Parks Construction
332
Grant Funding)
Parks & Recreation
56
3 Packet Pg. 83
8.A.b
c
FL
c
a�
E
m
O
L
CL
E
CL
U
c
IL
d
U.
Q
U
N
O
N
CD
O
N
N
N
O
CL
O
L-
a.
a�
z
O
c
O
c
a�
m
L
IL
L
a_
U
N
t
K
W
r-�
C
d
E
t
c�
R
r
Q
Packet Pg. 84
8.A.b
Cip
GENERAL
c
c�
a
c
O
L
Q
E
a.
m
U-
.Q
Iq
N
O
N
On
T-
O
N
N
N
O
O_
O
L
d
t
4-
O
C
O
d
d
L
L
IL
u
N
a+
t
K
W
C
N
E
t
u
ca
Q
Packet Pg. 85
8.A.b
c
c�
a
c
m
E
m
O
L
Q
E
Q
V
a.
d
u
m
U-
.Q
V
Iq
N
O
N
On
T-
O
N
N
N
O
O_
O
L
d
t
4-
O
C
O
d
d
L
IL
m
L
IL
c�
N
a+
t
K
W
C
N
E
t
u
ca
Q
Packet Pg. 86
8.A.b
_ N
O N
F T
O
N
a
N
O
N
CO
N
O
N
Cli
N N
W O
N
0
N
O
N
V
d
'p N
O
d Cl
O
N
O
N
01
O
N
d
CO a7
O
N N
W
a
LL
U
= CCV �7Q a N
as 0 E E L C
e� 0 o c o m
W = 0 N N O O C Q
a g a > > j)
OOO/��"Oa W
w`n>>o��
a) C ..
CCL a 4 7 O) N {gyp
IL aQoonaU2 U
0000
O O
O O
C O 0 0
LO
P�
01,
CO
M(D
O1INMrMM
Oar
0M
Cl)
EA
fHa
^
M
H3
0)1l
fA H3
W 6'3
fH
Oa M
' 6'3 '
H3 H3
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
Cl)
O
O
O
Cl)
619.
0
�
If)
rl
M
ur w
N
0 0 0
D U
w w
N
0 0 0
U U
64
O
O
0
O
0
O
0 0
O O
0 0 0 0
(D 0 0
C
C
U U
U U
O
O O
a 0 0
r
O
CD 0
0 0
0 C)
0 0
^
0
f^D N M
Q9
0
`
`
�
H3
O
M d3
H3
M a
613 613
4,
C C
.2.2.2.2
C C
3
.� .�
N N
p O
.� .�
N N
O O
O
q>
5
5-
O O
0 0
O O
0 0
O O O
0 0 0
O
0����
N N
N a)M
CON
D)I�
001f)0
a)CM
if)I1 O
I4
CO Efl
Efl N
Lr)
C) C)
C) C)
is is
is is
ODUUU
0
O
O O
O O
O
O
M
n
M
2222
C C
C C
if)
._ .
0 MM C)
M
0 C)
.2
O
O.64
C C
C C
u
N N
u uJ
N N
LO
N
O O
O O
N N
O O
C Q
N m
O O
Q Q
O O
O M
O 1-
Efl M
CD
M C
Cl
M
H3
I� O
V V
VEiT VEiT
Cl)
LO
EA
X X
Ix
111trIx
X
Ill
c
E
C
CO
CCi
aa)
a)
w
O
CEi
u O
U
u
c
a
aa) 0.
Q
a)
E
ywww
C c
c c
E
0
E E
�
> C
ur ur
4C
C
oID
>
0
N N
o 0
y
"0
0
N
p
m
O
m m
O O
C£
i
C)
i
O C) 0
cO
UE
o
a
a a
m£c0oa£i>
p
0
o
a
E E
E E-
c 0
'o
c
a> a
aE
2—
E>
>a
0
5
0
C�C-�v�icE0
_
_ _
E
a�
g—
L
i
.2.0.0.0
>
I.
5
0
E n
M
a) c
C
ati
i
ati ati
l i
c
a 0
L
a) L)
>. O-
is
i
m d
d d
L V
-.2
0 U i
d O
N
a C
C C
CO 0
O r
s i C
�0�03333�2�3
p
(n >
m
(�! (n
(n (n
C
-
L O
��
-
U
L
N_
UUU
E
�(n
. >
N UQ
U
0
N1 N
"'fDOaOL
COp
fN�1 r-
v
CO
v N
�
N N
N
rn
N
C, M N
U U
�
@J
@J @J
(0
L L
Q M
M M
M M
O
NLO
0 0
0 0 0
N N
M22222CA�
MUUUU
0000000
O O
fH 0
0 0
O
0 0
O O
0 0
O O
0�
M
1�
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
EfJ 0
O O O
0 0 fA
O LO
a 0
O
MMMOM00061)
O M
f D O
O O
1 l o
COM
r r
W
fD
0 0
ow
N
(Dr
CON
O O
0
OM
� d3
M61)
fA
"
H3
0H3Mr
H3
fH
H3
H3
r
"fA
H3
ON
'
d3
LO
fA H3
fA
N
' H3
H3
O
O
O
00
O O
M M
�
O
O
O
O
O
W
�
613,
00
00
O C
do
W' NMNN
O
O
C
No
O
00
C
O
C
r
O
O
O
C
O
O O
O O
C 0
O r
MM
to
O
O
O
L6
a
O
O
O
N
r
O O
00
C C
f D O
N
W
fH
EA
SO
H3
H3
fA
H3 fA
KJ
D3
H3 H3
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
M
O O
00
O O
2MO
O
00
O
O
O
If
O O
00
O O
c)
O
O
O
OpN
O
000
O
O O
O O
LO
H3
N
EA
M
64
63
63
N
EA 63
63
63
N64
63
U')
lD n
O
e3
N ao
N
66,
Ef3
W
Cl)
m
M
�
N
Ll
MD
R
M
O
C
V
O
H3
U�
O
V
�R
X X
Ix
111XIIIX
X
X X
X X
11
ur
c
a)
E
a)
E
o
0
CO
o
a
E
CO
C
CO
U
-a
— ul
Q
°Ci
3
3
U0E
N Q
C)
CO
U
N
ID
CD
OL
N
O M
U)
> ?�
Ca
NC
O
uv0$UUQ
Y
�>
¢
C\lto
a
0
g
C
°o
mom
Dram
iLL
f6a
fD
E
T
L
�
p
W
E
CO CJ
in
OL
�
0~
7
N�
0
a)
W a)rn
a) °'9
C)O
Ci�
�
U)
u�
U) 0
Ca E
o 0
0co
0 a¢
N
Q u)
a
o
a
Ong
E
CO >
"NO NOOO
£ YOQ
(M
a) N
EL
CD
0 oininU)U)
E a
Qi
poQ
U) c
E
Ea
£z
p
O
>
>
c
>
N
W 2
N N
W E
r- 72
-0 C
Q E
'p
C) N
C) C
Y 2
E E
E'
O M
N Q
CO
r
CO
M 3
a)
Q T
mw
O O
000E
£��yyao
EY
pmLy
V?UU
UU,,;UUUa�
0
_�
CU)
a) a)
D"OOOQ
U?UUU"00
O N
C
W O
o M
V) C
Q
Q>
QL
C.L..
.L..
.L.. •z5-.
O a-
O
CV
M
(0(0
M M
C�
O
M
M
E
'�
Y
U NNN
4 0
W..NN�NNNUW
0
2M0M2�U2In
7
Packet Pg. 87
8.A.b
00 N
(^p 4 O C)O
O (0D M
O
O O
O �
N
O
O
W CO
W CD
M N
R O
N CO N
M
fq
p CO a) I� M
a
ap W - M M
N M r
q �69. 619. yJ
N
N O (D T
O C') (D W r
W N M M
O O OC') N
CO
y" ao v v
N CO �
69
y orn
O Lq a0
b W N M a
Nf;; 613, 03, r
LLJ
M n
a0 N
N L, M r-
00 - v v
��C
t=
N
C w
O R
U Un
2
v y o
aa)) 0 Cr
00 m
UA 05 Q
L L L
N N O
N N
N M
J J J
y O O O
Qf V U U U
a` w aZ a0 d
COCl) (0 (0
� �
V O
O O
c
N O
r m
O O
UO
EA
EA
CO
M
n O
c0 O
• �
00
O O
In O
N
6N�
ERr
EA
N
N
N O
O
00
M m
O O
O O
00
O
N
p
Lo
r
e-I r
EA
N
coo
W �
� mu)
00
cc
N
l-1
p
O
Ci c
V 7
O O
c O
L O
N
cM, O
120
N
r
O)
r o
ln0
co O
O.tO
m
0
O
O
0
0 0
00
O O
u)O
N
T
U)
fRN
U)
a)r`aar�oowoo
o o
O V
O O
O 0 0
co 10
oo'TONO
Lo(O
Un Lo
C E
n�
007 N
2 O
Ef3 H3N
N u)
H3 E9
V3
H3 E9
%
W
IL
LL
U
c
E
d
O
N=
O
O N
` o
5 C
O ._
o O
a N
o0
c 0dO
o
tm
E
O
N
(D
ro
R
O
O
N
...) y
CL
v
o
5' 3
U c
n c
clj
N
��
>
y O
c E�
E
t
oo
o
a
c ��wYw
O Wo
.'oo_U
clj
y
E¢
O
W y
i
d)
O
�
� N
�a
•` U
caa
m
U x
L ELL
¢LL
LL
L
Ca
fQ U
N
N
U°��acid(`nddm
CO
o
ayLLO?U>00LL
C
R
R o
U
c 0
c c
c c c
y
L
O E
O O
O O
d
c m
N
E
a)
._ O
m
m
m 2
U¢
0 0
0 U H
V
N
M
Cl)
69.
Ir
T
0
Cn
07
C
CO
CO00
O
Cli
a
N
O
N
M
N
0
N
N
N
O
a00
UO
000)
O O
OO
-,
a
N
EA
O M
fD di
H3
fH
0
a0
00
00
00
00
O
N
O
N
O
p
N
O
64
N
O O
M
O
W
0
N O
Of
(D
O
N
(O
ER
4a
�N
fA
O
M
H3
d0
W �
000
OD
M N
cm,
a
O £
^
1N CON
O UMf1
7
M
M C', UMfI
N •0
H3
EA EA
6
7�
EA
W
IL
LL
U
L
N
a)
=
R
O
N
E
N
N
N
y
W
C m
NCa
Up
m
E c
O
L 3
> a)
>.
oU
CO
aa)
N>
o.Q
aN
Eo
EQ
va)
C
C O
aE
O
ECCru
a)
U) >,
.0
C
a) c
tU
((
U)
Ccc lcS
U)oa)
L
w�
V
Yu)Ol2
R
W o
CD C)>
N�oE�a).0
a) r-
a)
c y
c
c
O
U
w
m
c
CO
O
E 2
0
O
Ein
E
=(oo
>(n—
O
Q653:
..
N .j
U/)-oa
O
E
Q U
�D)a
E.L.
U=L>
>O
R�
ca0
CO
c O
> Eo
O"OONL�
NY
O
N
O.-U
@J�
�@J�
Ea
o
�
N
a)m
� �
� U
� N
>
� �
a)
.e
a a
3:
d�ia
Q)
ai¢�U
U)
OQ
¢
L �¢
�¢
ID
N"NO
N
L L
•
00 U�
L y
>
W L
W
C U
= L
L fD
= C
O
C
a�O�NL
^¢`^UaDMNUN
E
Cli
y
t6 (6
W
(y N
=L
(y (O
2==
R
N.-.--Y
(y
(y
v ._ W
oa
oCMt
6
ma)C7mtit
CD
@aaa�^p
a)a)a)_o_
CO
Yaa
a)
Rmaam
a)
Y
H
LL H
Un LL
LL (n
U LL
LL H (n
W3i
409
Ln
N
O
6H
0
CD
N
H
O
61)
CM
O
CD
6-1
U71
61)
a
coca
coca
O
O O
O
O
O
O O
O O
U)
M
N
O
�
� NO
�
N
-,
0 0
0000
0 0
C C
00
O
O
O O
O
U O
Cl)
C) U)
l O N
Un
I�
Un O
I� 000
r�
0
N
fl 7
v3 EA
ER
ER c
ER
N
2
EA
0
0
C.
C. C.
0
0
C.
C.
0
00
N
N
n
EA
f-
O
O
N r-
r U`
p
EA
Qi
EA EA
N
yj
0
O
N
m
N
EA
O
O
N
O
Un
O
N
N
H3
01
N
d
co
G.-
N
W
a
LL
U
w
to
Co
N
U)
O
m
L
U
a)
>
Co
E m
C
0
M
O E
-a
i
E y
no a)
N y
'RO
a c
L O
y>
i
U
O (i
> a
> `
O N
5 E
N
aclQ
cl
O '-
o m
o
O
N
O >
a) U
l0
d c
L C
o
m
C¢
> N
i
:
o cn_
L
N
N
y
` c
a)
E R
a0
W
y¢
d>)Q
Ma0a
R
u)
Q
V
u) M>
�rnc)@
m
R
C R
C C
L
ao
L C
-
M co
lS¢a
n2
N2-2
Q
Packet Pg. 88
8.A.b
0
0
0
0
Da)
0�
0
o
0
0
0
C
Co
KJ
0
EA
a)a)
��
�
69
00
000000000
O O
O O
fD O
a C
O O
C C
O O
C C
000
000
O
O O
00
00
O O
0000
0000
O
O O
O
Oa
O fD(DN
1, 000
OON
M1�
o0D
O�
O
O
W O
O�
000
LO00(D0
000000
0
M d3
EA
00a
fA d3
ODN
EA EA
H3
fA
N
H3
H3
H3
LOfD
d3 H3
a
H3
(D 0)
fA fA
N
69
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O
O
O
O
O
120
O
O
O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O
O
0
O O
O O
7 0
O O O
O O O
0 0 0
r-120
OI20M
(D
O
127
0I-n
O O2
O
O2
0w70m0
O
M I�
00
M EH
di
�2 tli
di
di
di
M
di
di EA
N
EA 64
di
di di
EA d
fA
O
O
O
O
N
EA
O
O
O
N
EH
E
v�
6s
3
c
E
U
a.
L
m
a >
O
Q
aci
Q
rn
�
�
Q
OC E
OTC
E
v
v
O
3
(n
>
m
m v
E c
m
E in
m
c
�
>
Q
CO
L
Cl)°
L
(A m
O
a
a E
m m
p
m
ai o
N
N
o
6 Q7
0
C O
Q>
`Q IL
O N
L L
7`
N
L O
YO
C
Ir
° a
5 E
E °
QC
E m
U
ai w
Q wCq
M fO
N
L
QCC0
^
rn
j�
o m
•F
(n
p
V1 C
c
0 E
0 YO
C
YO YO
O
L O
O�
Q
CO-p
Y
C U
O 0
U
U C
y 0
U
N M
O 'O
O N
L L
aD N
L
U) (O
7
O
- L
O N
S•. O
O C
d
>>C
> N
U
OCO
E
N N
1-'O2Q
YO
E
ONQ
O>
O
y<i
Co a?
y
E
O E
E E
E
M E
L o
N
?
2 c
c
(pL25�
.2
E
,P O
D D
L o
Co >.o>.E
o
m¢
ai
o
E c
° D
Q 0 O
E Er
L
(n
N
T T
OD N
N
O 3
Z
CD N
O
d
N
M N
R>
N c6
N L
�(O
L
O.L.•
L Y
OD>�>>
>° >m
Co Co
o > m
Y > m
E Y
O N
a
05 .L.•
w E
a) N
N
O In
M >
�_ 2i
(n (/^�0�
a N (n
aj V
V V
V Q
min
O O
N
>in
T O
U) -3
M V
0
O O Vl
>aaav
Q O
O O
O N
.0 L
> >
Q Q
a L_
in
C L_
6 3
N
c
O d
O7
55 c
O
L
7
J
N p
L L
L O
R p
E N
N L(0
E
Cl)
Cl) Cl)
Cl) (n
Cl) Cl)
000 w
w N�
N
W 2
�
Cr Cl)
2 LL W
to to
a a
7 7
N N
O O
Cl) CO
60! E!!
O LO
O m
O) O
R
I� O
N
N G
N N
fA Kf
O O
O O
O O
O Co
LO lD
I-- N
N lD
fA Kf
O O
O O
C C
O O
Ln Ln
N N
7
HJ EH
O rn
O N
O (D
O Cl)
O Co
N l0
6f1 LO
N
W
Packet Pg. 89
8.A.b
E
L
O
a LL
rty+ C7
C a
� Q
E a
d
O
L cc
� �0
E U
Ln
� N
=- c
U Li
O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
�
OO
069.0
00
000000000
0
0H
EA K30
N
o00
0000000000a0000
00
O
LO
L2 O
O
O LL1
O O
O ll1
O O
LOlf7
O
lf7
O LOjp
N
Cl)
6Fk
LO
fA 6s
f�
EA
-lO
V3
OMH4
H3 LO
V3
Mr�N
H3
H3
LO LOM
CD
ff3
Ors
Cl) 64
O
6.
r
EA
6c
O
N
O
O
O
O
O
O O
O
LO
613
LO
EH
o
o
O
LO
E9
LO LO
EH 6s
LO
cq
N
lb�
V9
O
N
O
O
O CDO
M
LO
V3
O
LO O
V3
LO
cq
N
O
u0
7
EA
N
00
O
O
O
N
Lfl
Ln
6s
O
O
O
m
N
LO
u07
O
N
O
O
O
O
O
O O
O O
O
N
N
fA
V
0
E!l
V3
V3
V3O
N O
E03 LO
O
co
O
N
O
O
O
O
0 0
0 0
O
O
O
o
O o
0 0
O
N
LO
V3
LO
d3
O
LO
EA
LO O
r 10A
0 O
LO �
O
V3
N
00
fii O
O
O
O O
O O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O O
O O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O O
O
O
W
O O
O
O
O
O
O Lo
O
O
7
0 0
In
Lf)
d3
fH
6%
fii
rEiJ
Ei) H3
63
fH
O
V9
V9
�
N
w
O
O
O O
fii fH
w O
w O
O O
O H3
O
E03.
O
O
O
O
L- 0
V 6e*
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
0
E
O
LO O
It co
LO
rl
O
LO
O
co
LO O
T
LO
H
t
H3
(A
fH
N
E9
6%
fA
fR
V9
63
W
W
O
N
IL
X
X
X
U
O
E
U
N
Y
N
O
c
N
N
U)
�
N
C
N
r
E
E
7
C N
C
O
U
o
w
N N
N o
O
CLS
N
N d
N N
N
N
O
C
o
Eo
o°
N
o d
m E>
`o
co
E Y
a
n
w
a
a a)
E m>
—
O
a E�
O
a>
E o
a.—
O-�
d
C LE
E
O
C
E Y
O
O
N—Is
U
m
O
Q
Em°Om
uaaUmE°aOm�'yLouc
N
Z
o o
cc aEaxfC7a
c
aYE�aO�`�
> C
o mY
S
U
m >a
m=
rna
ma3i�Y
yaLL
a c
a' N
rnYa
ca'c
w U
E
omma
m a
t
o>
o
Y a
c
a3 a
.�
0 o
a �
E
W C
(y03
>>
9 O
coN
0 N
c d
N�
p L�E
d
a
aQmUCJULLU2222'acnU5�iY4U1U>xo
10
O O O O O O O O
O 0 LOO�0 O Lon
C �Ln Vk
to
O O O O
� O O O
co O O O O
� f!3 �
� O O O
O O O
O O O
�
� O O O
G O O O
n O O O
�
oc o o O
O O 00 O
O O O
U)
O o 0 0
O O O
W) H3 LO
O O O O
O O LO 0 I
CT C4 CT cm
fh 7 � ff3 Ln
H3 E9
O M O O 0', LO O
O O O N cm V O O
� M LP) 6q lf3 ; n
H3 H3 60
U
N
(�
L
co
a_
r
V
U
N
N
�
�
a)
.0
N
O
i
o
N
y
`--' CL
is
a
E E
W
t
YO
O n
M
++
a
as
a m 7
m
d
c E w U
a)�co
>oam�
p
a
m
s
w
�.0
t
CN
ll
O
0 w E c a c c
i
r
E~
E'�Ya d
a`
Ha
Co
Q
C
a
� U a�cnin a
a
�
C
a
E
.�..
Q c'Qa OLa
CO
l
,�..
I`
w
H
ILQ Q Q of
F
Packet Pg. 90
�
\
/$r,
a
o
*
7
7#�
cD
§
� -
\
; CM
co
oD
�Cl
kkk
- -
\
�
r§
d
/-
\k�
-
5
4§°
\-
jkk
§
-
C
cli
4§r
Ln
»
L§Ln
//Q
}
z-
e±m
C4
\
oDwLn
�77
G
0a82
40
- -
n
w
§
/\
ca
2/
�2(
�_\
&
e�(ts
§/e
t
!
(�]
)-
\
cc
m))
cc\jj\
k�2
2
]]
Packet Pg. g1
8.A.b
07O
Ln
0�000
OMO
N
O
m (C
0)N
M CO
C.)L0
r C
0�
l0 r%
0)
(C N
d1 C,fD
(D
O
(O r
O
N
O O
O It
(0 O
C rn
O
O
O
O
C\j 00
n
a
c
W Lo
613� 6C�
N (0
03� in
O
�
O
Cli
49
N
W O
00 O
O Co
N O
O
O
O
C
CO
0
Cl)
O
(00
613 V)
N n
613
O
NEfJ
NVJ
N
0 O
O
0 0
O
00 O
r
r l0
m N
O
O
O
O
N
N
O N
�O
��
NN
N O
cf?
V)
� N
O
N
O
0 O
O
0 0
O
y
M O
r (0O
M N
q
O
O
O
C
V
r
O Cm
��O
NN�
•p N
if}
69
V}
a
0
CO C)
N
r
0�0 CD
r O
00
O
O
NO
00LO
613 V)
N fM0
V) V7
N 0
� �
V) f,
� O G9
N
On
Co0000
0
(C �
7
OD 0
00
0 0
O 00)
10 10
a
0)
r-NN
N
004
(0
O
613 V3
6F3 V�
r, C\j
-e
N
40
0En-
CD
Oi-
Cl) O
IOf) 00
�
�
O
00 CO
00 O)
0
N
E
W UUf)
69 fA
OD
e4 rV)
C
N N
W
a
LL
U
E
a
L
O Y
r
O
a
Co
y
*• _2
t
.
E
Nm
(Ud d
a
0)
E U
m C)
COv
E
UU
�O
Q.O
y
Oy N
rL
C (n
CL
Q
c
N C
N
Q.
Q
as C
2 0
0 V
E Cl a)
a
0)
N
E
Z
a) c)
a) y
a O
d &n
oC x
U
m °>
N
y
o m
T
❑
d
QCO
Co
Cn
YOU
U
U Li
a
o0o
r MU
r a'
000000v0000000000
O OOEA
Ef3 EAM
OEA
EA0000000
0000
Oc (O
0000000
O cM
0
N
66
O m
0 0
0 0 0
ocO CM
" EA
EA
0NNm,r
EA EA
000
EA EA
V3
O
O
0
0
O
O
Cl)69
NfF?
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
CO69
NfF?
O
O
O
O
0El3
69
N
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
N
ea
(00
E9
N
i3
O
O
C.
O
C.
�
O
0
M 69
�
0 0
CoO
0
0 0
0 0 Q
000
00 (O
00000
0�
10
Ed
n
NNOn�
7r
69 V3
7V3
V)
V3
V)r
fC>
00
(NOO
COM
N 00,
00
0E!?-
00
r-
O-
r L00�
rgC,
�n(DOnOn
Or
O V3
V3
'Nr
6q r
'�tNN
Ef3 Vf
Vf Co
Ef3
V3
x
t
x
U
tl)
(6
ul
O7
C
O-
N
y
>
o(D
>
U
m
y
N
Q
Cn
m
s
>
3
0
N
UO
0)�0
(6
(n
❑
U
O�cp�S
=>
E
os
2d5
•N
E
2<
"
U)
ma
c
ns
IL Cl
N
O
N
Q
`�
7 a
O C,)
C
0
O c
aC
O
N
g—oC
r
E
(o
E2
N
O
d
o.
N N
r Co
Cn �-
qj,
O V
y
N
N Col
U) >.
� .N
"a
a�
E OS
>s
O �O)
d C
N Ca
Caio
O )
�
V) C
O
d>
>
>. N
(o E
O
o
c
> Y
a E�
io
Cu
Q C
O)
m0
� a)
U
(a
3�
c ns
.a
N �:;
d
x
E
C)0)
C C
c (o Co
_
Cn
Cn _
C
U oa
w
a)'(E
C O
mU
IL(�
a
C
�(�a)
�sds
=Y
£2rn
£a
C
oo�Oo
N
is
is
Q 00
SdN
00
Co
Cm
LU
W(50
NFQ
oo
a �
r
n (O
N R
40 69
O O
O O
0 0
O O
N f`
V) VT
O O
O O
O O
O O
� �
O O
O O
O O
)O O
V) VT
O O
O O
O
fR "
O N
O 0
O
Ln
T to
R
V)
64
V N
M M
Co
Co
N i!)
N fl
N
69 64
Co
R R
N N
0 00
r
V} VT
Q
12
Packet Pg. 92
8.A.b
Ln
e
a
O
Cl)
ER
M
O
M
Co
f0
O
N
O
W
N
O
VT
O
R
�O
n
Co
N
n
�O
n
O
O
0)
60
n
0
a
r
Co
Lq
Cl)
(a
13
Packet Pg. 93
8.A.b
LL
O O
O C D
O 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
N
o
a0 00
O
C
N
W)
O N
(�
N
G
M M
to
N
O
0
�
o
N
O
O
LQ
N
fR
O
O
Cn
N
O
O
o
N
"?
H3
O
0
0
N
N
O
LQ
N
ER
N
O
O
O
O
00
00
0
0
c
0�
N
N
0 K3
_o
K3
ER
O Co
O
O o0
O
C)
CD N
LO
Uf M
H3
_0
e3
(0
O N
CO
000 �
N
W
eD
e3
00
C
N
IL
LL
x
X
U
C
O
=
C
O.
E
("a
O
�N
o
m
C
l6
Y
Co
C
Cn
U
Co
�
O
�
U
3
0
�
o
Co
Cz
O
c
C
C
3
O
4
ECL
w
oa0
O
cc
a)
W
F
0 m
y c
p-0
3 o
a)
QO
01
aa)) 'OO
Co f6
N a)
y
Y f0
Z
�:
(} o)
co OC
d a)Co
U
U2
a�Y-
��Y
mCL
a) i0
o'E
U .�
ova
c
c O
m o
y
Co
0
Q o
.
0 o
ca
E —
o c
Era
o Oa
°
(ca
> m
IL
vtUiU�U�wiia0iU>
6%
Co
Co
Co
nCli
Cm
N
N
4
N
co
N
N
O M
N C\j
7
(ND
M N
N N
O C'
N N
N
co
N
N N
N ch
N 69
V
(No
N
Cm
C'
O
N C\l
N
co
O N
N N
°7-
O
N
N
(oN
(Zo0
C
O Cm
01)
(n
IN(VH)
N CD
Co((a
O
O W
£07
(No
W
N Nff)
W y3
z;
ao
O
N
C
c
O
F
_�
g
C
O
F (3
y
C
N
E
O
C E
N O.
6
'
Cz O
a)
O
La>
CL
O
a
N
(o ��
>a)
c
aO)Eo
Co
>
O N
N "O
=
i0
f0 f0
•�
= (n
01
i0
N N
s(L
O (6
0 T
O
.y
Co
c
`y
F
>
U CO
Y=
Y
Y -�
_
L. L C
y•=
0 u
O
C L
01
c't
C�
�a
U 17L
O 2
'tQ�r
O
O)^
_
mE
Z5
Z5(o7m
O
nsy
d
OpUUo
3i
O
17L
N
�
C
N--------O
N
4) 7
C
y
a)
3 fi
O Y(Cl
w>
(a-O^
N N
w
Ou7
N N
f� Ou7
N N
u7
N N
u7 u7
N N
u7 (a
N N
,mo
L ((�«)
O N
w
N
(c
a�
_ err
�rrrrrrrrrrr
E
l6
f0
LL
U
2rr
U
L L
iO L
L L
L L
L L
L L
L L
-O
W L
L
a)
a) a)
�LLLL,O.LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL
7 7
7
7 7
7 7
7 7
7 7
7 7
7
OLL
7
W
t cz
E
5
E E
(° E
E E
E E
E E
E E
E E
E
E
" O
U CO
1 yCO
O O
CO.�
0 0�
O
y�wwww������
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
Eww
O y
y
'acycy'
a y
y y
C
Cm
O Cm
Cm o
Co
RUUUEE.OEEEEEEE
LL
Co Co
a)
LL a
aa
am
C) C)EEEE
m m
m
c E
EL
—
a a
aa
aa
aa
aa
aa
O
)
acacc
E
Co E'E'E��
2
2 2
2 e
e e
2
2 a)
> O
O)Y
a a.9
E
—DaaaaaaaDaa�aa
Y E
E E
E E
E E
E E
E E
E
E 2)
ccccmmammacacaccocacaco[o[o[o[o[ccccUM
u
a
N
n c
c
A C
N
a
u
u C
n c
u c
u
a
u
u c
n C
A C
N
a
N
n C
.iiy c
u
a
N c
u n c c
N C
A
a
N c
7 C,
7 C
0
0
0
fA
O O
O
O O
N
LO
O
CD r
H3
O
H3
O
O O
O
0(Oo
U-)
cl fH
C,
U
a)
V1
Co
d
O
a)
Z
a)
N
E
N
EE
Cl
O
N
Cr,
C
O
m
>
O
C
.L
w
N
c
2a`
Co
�
I
a)'It--
0
o m
m
a) 3
m
E
C
F C
y
E ..
y
Co
°'LL-OYOC7
C
o
a)
m
= m
>
F
c
`mLL
2
d "
(i'—
m
a C
C O c
o
N
U
(oi
y,
>
ooa)IDaa))
U
>
U
y L
o
�xC7�ott
.
Sc
ca
m('n�EEa
o
o�
y
o LL
a-
a-c
g o
0 o
o
a 0
vUUILCCU)U)
c
c o
U
0cC
Q
14
Packet Pg. 94
8.A.b
Vy
O
O
O
N
O
61)
O
O
O
O
O
N
co
a
N
7
N
R
C
v
N
c
r
`o
a
R
C7
0
3
O
eu
N
N
N
U
w
W
c
RO
c
a
J
U!
m 5
L .O
N
T
N
R
16 d
U r
-a o
0 a
0
U
m d
F
a
> 0
m
N
U N
T /
cc U
C W
F
w a
15
Packet Pg. 95
8.A.b
R
N
0
N
O
0
O
N
O
E
(6
O
a.
M W
C v
d AD
E O
m a`
E
N
v
Q C
C
U i
0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 (O
(O M
n M
0 0
0 0
O
O 6-1ERJ
E9
r O
l!7C
EF} CA
C�M7
l!7 7
O n
L M0
O E9
O 6-100
O
Oh
C00
0N0r(DN
0
Co
N
r Co
Coo
Cn0
0 U
M
(0D
�
N
6C,
N
M Cl)7�
r
49
sl
4R}
E9
V31 E9
V3,
V3,
Co
r-
M 00
N N
0
M �
ER}
000
n
N
r
Co
CO
O
M
�
E9
N r
C)7
(0D
O
n
00 0
N fn
f13�
4RT
LO
O
7
D>
0
O
w
n
Sri
CoI
N
E9
CD
Co
CD
C.
in
a
o
ai
m
O
O
0
fA
fA
E9
0
0
0 0
O
O
0
O
C
00
O O
O
0
O
n
LU O
N
n
CO
n
O
E9 M
o
M
eq�
r
09,
U3
EF}
00
CM Co
O
O
C2 U)
rOn00
0 0
N
0
N 0
(qo
le
n
N
N
0 Ln
N 0
W
0 n
EA
49 (D
EA
LO N
- Hi
N
49
49
EH
V3,
n
y
Co
D.
W
C
E
fN
>
C
O
O r
N M
M
N 0
CA
p_ r
N
N
N
£ N
N N
N N
a)
CO
L
L
L
L L
L L
p
(a
aaaa�aaaaa
C
o
E
a
Cu
O
O
Cu
C i
as 0
c0 0
O
U (A
--
O
O y
0 y
E 0
0 0
0 0
G= N
C
oDa`d
�d
(Dddddd
E
(°
CCt
J
O> C
C C)
C C)
(O C
C C
C C�>
O
E
E
E O
E O
o E
E E
E E
N`
3
Y m
a U
M (0
U 0
CS C
U 0
CS C
0
N (0
0 0
N CS
U U
CS CS
G= £
Vl
(n
Cl CL
Cl CL
N L
> (D�QLLm
US
> C)
(D
N
C)
N .
N C)
C
y
C
O
nSm
ns
CnLLLLLLLLLL
nsOns(„)064�
Q ns
Ell
O
C C
C C
C C
0(VCO(n
Co
0
NQQ
Q Q
Q Q
LLN(nN
� 6
01
n
D7
n
Co
M
M
M
N
N
49
to
N
O N
`�
O
n
n
o
O
O
O
v
N
�
�
CD
N
_00
O
� O
O
a)
07
O
O
Ln
0
M
COD
cc
N
Co
�
N
_
Co
CD m
O
O
O
O
0
N
O
n
n
N
O
N
_
Q!k
ta
a
am
O a
6G, rn
o0
0
Ci
a
O
Co
17�
al
T
O
M
N
N
fn
09�
49
to
O
O (D
y3 to
0
o
a
o
0
Co
CDO
C
CI
N
Co
N
En
En
4E 1
6G,
O
CD4H
O O
CDO
_ O
0
'o
(D
(D
O
V O
LO
00
CO
N
N
r
n O
CO
T
-It
N
(D"
E9
E9
N
CD
O to
6a CD
0)
(D O
O
a
a
m
E
0000
n
n
Co O
Cl)
T
y
T O
N
N
to
W
D) 64
4H
00
r
r
EH
0
N
ul
N
O
C
N
N
E
fA
Of
C
O
N
O
r
Cl
3
N
i
U
C
Co
C
O
r
a N
to
C N
Cu
U
vJ
m
o v
ob
LL N V
t
0
2
FA 010D
C i "
0
Cu(C
iL
E
E a a
aimLLa
'p N
N E "•
Wa
O
LL
3
7 Of OS
(D
7
C U
C
i0
(Dm
m E
E 03 03
0
C
C
F CCO
H H
C00000U(3
(a
O
O
O
VR
(a
n
Co
OI
Co
4NA
0
0
R
M
N
(a
ql>
Q
16
Packet Pg. 96
/
6�
\
§
Cli
k §
Cm
Cli
A
ƒ CD
k
a
�$64
§g
OD
69
w
\
x
/
EE
0
a
ƒ)
f
�k
chj
\
E
§
�4
C
E
0
Cn
7
_a
�*
§
§
§%
)
j
\�
0.
(D f !
wo
Co
vy
�
Lq
a a
_ 7
E
Co /
CL
_ E
�
.
Ci
0.
\
a IL
q
k
\ U.
m
v
2
# 2
/ k
CS
_ 2
0
CL
Cn o
R a
§ 2
e I �
f
�
�
)
a
=
Q
)
_
§
\
°
w
q\
t
0
IL
�
k
tam
a
�
7,
Q
_
k2a)
\
■§,
IL
\ME
2
17
Packet Pg. 97
8.A.b
N
O
N
H p
O
N
N
O
N
m
N
O
N
V
N N
O N
N p
W N
O
N
O
N
V
d N
p CD
N
a`
O
N
O
N
O1
O
N
O
N N
W
O O O
�' o S
Ld N
K3 d?
H04 O O
O
dT
Q
O
dT
0
O O
O O
L61 LO
I
dT
� � N
3 O �
O T N
= N 6 7
E y U m
w ¢ (D a�
CO O
£d m
2FD H CL H
O
O
N
O
Co
N
O
O
O
O
Cl)
O
O
N
O
N
O
O
O
O
LO
In
N
O
N
O
O
O
O
m
V
N
m
Cl)
N
0
0
0
0
O
N
O
Co
m
N
O
O
Ni
O
O
O
O
fl
O N
V
V
O
p�
fA
LO
O
N O
O
vs
R
N
O
N
Cl)
N
O
N
LO
N O
N
O �
N
N
N
O
N
O
N
O
O
O O
NLO
1
O
69
O
f9
0
9 �
3 Q N
a_
U
N
N
rn +'
ty
N
T W
9
w v C
= U
d o t
a) aMo
V
d Q � o
w Co
C 00
H Z
18 Packet Pg. 98
8.A.b
R
N
O
N
r
O
N
O
N
00
O ._
N N
W
a
a
U
E
03
CL
O
C_
a
�
y
a
C d
O
�
E CL
E
0)
m
w
v
o
a
a
to
Z
E
c
M
H
R
W
Q
7
O
3
U Li
a
in
00000000m0(D
I, 0ON
fA
O o
Ef3 fA
O o
O r
O OD
O 0
00 Cl)
00
000
'IT
(D NNV(DM
OIl
LO LO
OOO
LO
7 M(Dm
00
rl 6s(D
ONr(D
Or
NICT
6c" M
E9.
Il o
6e. N
O N
r N
Cl) Cl)
N 6
Il
N
fA
fA
Y3 fA
Y3
fA
000
00 A
� �
O
Cl)
(D (D
m Cl)
N
LO
r EA
EA
Ef3
N
I-
N
lL7
7
LfJ
00
00
CA
m
O
00
r
0')
V3
EA
6
EA
O
O
O V
00
LO n
LO O
LO
N
O
(D (D
N
(0 Cl)00
EH
6c.*
O
0
W
00
O
lO 0
Es
0)
(D
N
m
(MD
r
69-
EA
lf3
C.
O
O M
O
O
O
0 r
LO COO
N
m
T M
(D Cl)
H3
El? EfJ
El)
000
O
O
000
O O
O
00
( D
O
�
P, �
EH
�
O
�
N
H3
LO
ODD
LO
00
r N
O
LN
r
O
Eli
EA
T
H)
EH
EA
x
N
N
N N
N N
N N
L
L
L L
L L
L L
a
aaaaaaa
1
i
16 i
16 vi
1 vi
C
C
C C
C C
C C
E
E
E E
E E
E E
N
Cl
a
-la a
-la CLla
E
E
E E
E E
E E
a
Cu
as((aaasCuas((a
aas.c
0
0
C
0) N
N N
O) N
O) N
O) N
L L
E
(D aS
ro aEi
aEi aEi
aEi aEi
aEi aEi
o°'c oTC
>ro
_"amN
3 3
Q
a
Y L
a>>
00
a
O N
a a
0) N
a a
0) N
a a
0) N
O) N
E
Co
a�
mG=Q:C=CccrCcC=(n(n
=E
as
-E
>
(D--3333333aa
Q M
(n
U)
(n (n
Cn (n
(n U)
°a
c
N
(n
(D
(n is
�a is
�a is
�a is
0) N
g a
L
N D
7 OO
0 7
7 7
7 7
7 7
(V
C
7 a7
C
C p
C
p
C C
C C
C C
N(n�QNNQQQQQQQUU
O O Co 44 0
O O O O
n (co L( N
O r r
On O G)
00 EH 00
CO 00
C1 m
Cq W
N N
EA ER
00 CD
r EH r-
N N
O O
N N
ER
N O N
00 EA 00
00 00
ZT R
M Cl)
O O
64
a 6 v
to Ln
(M M
Cl) Cl)
L!) LA
N N
fA EH
a
6 00
n
�
N
LO
R
R
N
N
W!
ER
O O
O O
Co
O
� 00
O
LD
Co
MM
01
(M
O
Cl)
1LO
ER
Co
FLO1
EA
L19 0
tT M
O r-
(p
0
0
Cl)
000 �
Ei? EA
T
-
�
O
Ln
�
44
N
O
C
m
E
as
d
L
ILN
a
� a
a
Co
3
E
R
3
C
o
C
a)
O N
LL 3
m
(n
co
m
Ca
N
C
N
N a)
C
c
o
U
(D 2
as
Q
E
(�
U)
m r
N
r
i N
AL
Co
O E
a
Y
o
•a; O
m a`
U) a)
- N
R E
a5
J J
p 0)
o-,(a
r
H Cc
H r
CD
O
O
O
O
Ef?
O
O
O
0
fA
O
O
O
O
613
0
0
O
O
fiJ
O
O
O
O
N)
00
O
Lr
co
tT
M
M
N
M
N
N
009
i9
Q
19
Packet Pg. 99
8.A.b
Cl)
N
O
N
Co
O
N
O
0
M 60
O
N N
O
N
O
M O
Ln O
O O
M Ln O
N N eq
n00
M LT Ln O
Lr n diO
N LO ) r
r 6 O ri LB
N V}
O O O Cl
O N m O O
O MV?OO
O r «j O
Lo N W V) —
O V3 Ln V)
N V}
Ln O O
� N Ln O
n MVLJO
N LD n V)
O
N � V}
O O O O
O N L O O O
O MV?O O
T OLOD LnO
r N 00 T
V3 Fs
NO
00
O O
00
O O
001 �
fR V3
n n
v rn
0 n
N n
LOLo
Lo
V) Vy
Cm O LNO
C1 W
LO
N V
n m
vV! V3
n N
M O7
to r
Ln
n n
� V)
O LD
r LD
r O
O LD
T LD
LD LD
N N
Vi Vi
Cl)
N r
OD OD
V) V)
n
n
M
Ln
Co
O
V)
M
N
(D
Ln
O
V)
.E.
0
in
m
c
m
N Co
7
C U N
d m
> o U
o[ a a
Co
0 0 0
LP n LO
n r Ln
O MLD
m N r
U U
C
N An
R
T �
� 3
c
3 in
o 0
a �
m .L
d U N
N
O F N N
3 y o N
c E E c F
Vw25CrI
Q
20
Packet Pg. 100
8.A.b
c
c�
a
c
CIPO
L
Q
Q
PARKS U
m
PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS'a
lq
N
O
N
O�
O
N
N
N
O
O_
O
L
a.
d
i
4-
O
c
O
d
d
L
L
a
u
N
a+
t
K
W
C
N
E
t
c�
cC
Q
21 Packet Pg. 101
8.A.b
c
FL
c
a�
E
m
O
L
CL
E
CL
U
c
IL
d
U.
Q
U
N
O
N
CD
O
N
N
N
O
CL
O
L-
a.
a�
z
O
c
O
c
a�
m
L
IL
L
a_
U
N
t
K
W
r-�
C
d
E
t
c�
R
r
Q
22 Packet Pg. 102
8.A.b
CIP PARKS
PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS
FUND 125 - CAPITAL PROJECTS
23 Packet Pg. 103
8.A.b
c
FL
c
a�
E
m
O
L
CL
E
CL
U
c
IL
d
U.
Q
U
N
O
N
CD
O
N
N
N
O
CL
O
L-
a.
a�
z
O
c
O
c
a�
m
L
IL
L
a_
U
N
t
K
W
r-�
C
d
E
t
c�
R
r
Q
24 Packet Pg. 104
8.A.b
PROJECT NAME: Sierra Park Improvements ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $75,000
LACE LEA F JAPAN ESh XIAPLE
{Aaer polma,um dhrccmm]
ihIkdc0d.... shrub or t—h --tire to Japan and Korea, 1,
Is mfe q-liv many -mme and Is the moss akn' and dell,-,, oS
all mapl,s. Its l,-rn are 2 fp a inrpes in I,n1;lh prc fl Delp cu,
Inrn threadlike -eel Wo . 1.to( roinr r-rFts by %orksy hul the
meet common colors are hrEphr V,--- and red. 'I hcse ,r
hart a mvunded form with weepkpµ branch,,. The.' cat bt
Rlo,.n In labs and are ta[eileal for bamal.
8011 Street West and 19111 Street SW, Snohomish County, within Edmonds City limits
5.5 acres; Neighborhood Park/ Zoned Public
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Playground replacement.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Site serves as neighborhood park with children's play
area, open lawn, softball/baseball fields and soccer fields, portable restroom facilities,
basketball hoops, parking and Braille interpretive trail for the blind.
SCHEDULE: 2019-2024
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Planning/Study
Eng. & Admin.
Construction
0
$75,000
$0
0
$0
0
1 % for Art
TOTAL
1 0
1 $75,000
1 $0
0
$0
0
* all or part of this Project may qualify for 1% for the Arts
a
25 Packet Pg. 105
8.A.b
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Final design and construction of 4th Avenue Cultural Corridor. Starting
from 2009 public process and concept design, develop site design and construction documents for a
safe, pedestrian friendly, and art enhanced corridor in the public right of way which provides a strong
visual connection along 4th Avenue N between Main Street and Edmonds Center for the Arts.
Interim work on this project since the concept was developed includes a 2015 temporary light artwork
"Luminous Forest", installed to draw attention and interest to the corridor and enhance the visual
connection between Main Street and the Edmonds Center for the Arts. The Cultural Heritage Walking
Tour project, funded in part with a matching grant from the National Park Service Preserve America
rant program, was implemented in 2011-2014 with 8 artist made historic plaques on 4th Avenue.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: The corridor improvements in the public right of way will
encourage pedestrian traffic & provide a strong visual connection between the ECA and downtown
retail. Improvements will enhance connectivity as an attractive walking corridor & contribute to the
economic vitality in the downtown. The project has been supported by the community in the 2014
Community Cultural Plan and in the recently established goals and priorities for the State certified
Creative District application.
Timing for final design development is crucial as the City begins to address utility projects in the area.
Design completion will assist the City in the process of identifying & acquiring funding sources for the
total project implementation phase.
SCHEDULE: 2019-2024
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Planning/Study
50,000
Engineering & Administration
Construction
100,000
1,000,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
* all or part of this Project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts
c
R
a
c
aD
E
m
0
L
0.
E
R
Q
R
U
c
M
d
d
r
0
R
u_
R
.Q
R
U
N
0
N
0
N
a�
Cn
0
a
0
a
a�
0
c
0
M
r-
aD
Cn
a�
L
a
0
a
U
N
r
x
w
c
a�
E
CU
a
26 Packet Pg. 106
8.A.b
PROJECT NAME: Anderson Center ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $35,000
Field/Court/Stage
700 Main Street, Snohomish County, within Edmonds City limits
2.3 acres; zoned public neighborhood park/openspace field
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Upgrades to youth sports field, picnic and playground amenities
and children's play equipment.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: As a neighborhood park, the Frances Anderson Center
serves the community with various sports, playground and field activities including various
special events. Upgrade and additions essential to meet demand for use.
SCHEDULE: 2019-2024
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Professional
services
Engineering &
Administration
Construction
$
$5,000
$20000
$5,000
$5000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$
$5,000
$20000
$5,000
$5000
* all or a portion of this project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts.
a
27 Packet Pg. 107
8.A.b
PROJECT NAME: Citywide Beautification I ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $126,000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Beautification citywide to include Library, Senior Center, outdoor
plazas, City Park, corner parks, irrigation, planting, mulch, FAC Center, vegetation, tree
plantings, streetscape/gateways/street tree planting, flower basket poles.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve beautification citywide and provide
comprehensive adopted plan for beautification and trees.
SCHEDULE: 2019-2024
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
Construction
$21,000
$21,000
$21,000
$21,000
$21000
$21,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$21,000
$21,000
$21,000
$21,000
$21000
$21,000
a
28 Packet Pg. 108
8.A.b
PROJECT NAME: Miscellaneous Unpaved ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $ 30,000
Trail / Bike Path Improvements
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Complete portions of designated trail through public parks to meet the
goals of the Bicycle Plan and Pathway Plan.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Walking and connections was listed as a high priority in the
comprehensive Park Plan from public survey data. Creating trails, paths and bike links is essential to
meet the need for the community. Provides for the implementation of the citywide bicycle path
improvements and the elements and goals of the citywide walkway plan. Linked funding with
engineering funding.
SCHEDULE: 2019 - 2024
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
Construction
$0
$10,000
$0
$10,000
$10,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$0
$10,000
$0
$10,000
$10,000
* all or part of these projects may qualify for 1 % for the Arts.
Q
29 Packet Pg. 109
8.A.b
PROJECT NAME: Brackett's Landing ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $15,000
Improvements
South: Main Street and Railroad Avenue south of Edmonds Ferry Terminal on Puget Sound
North: 2.7 acres with tidelands and adjacent to Department of Natural Resources public tidelands with Underwater Park
South: 2.0 acres with tidelands south of ferry terminal. Regional park/Zoned commercial waterfront. Protected as public park
through Deed -of -Right; partnership funding IAC/WWRC/LWCF /DNR-ALEA & Snohomish Conservation Futures
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Landscape beautification, irrigation, furnishings/bench
maintenance, exterior painting, repairs, jetty improvements/repair, north cove sand, habitat
improvement, fences, interpretive signs, structure repairs, sidewalk improvements, restroom
upgrades.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Retention of infrastructure for major waterfront park,
regional park that serves as the gateway to Edmonds from the Kitsap Peninsula.
SCHEDULE: 2019-2024
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
Construction
$
$5,000
$0
$5,000
$5000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$
1 $5,000
$0
$5,000
$5000
* all or part of this project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts
a
30 Packet Pg. 110
8.A.b
PROJECT NAME: Edmonds Marsh Feasibility ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $150,000
& Restoration / Walkway
South of Dayton Street and Harbor Square, east of BSNF railroad, west of SR 104, north of UNOCAL
23.2 acres; Natural Open Space / Zoned Open Space
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Using strategies and recommendations identified in the
comprehensive management plan, protect site from adjacent development and storm water
impacts. Continue to support daylighting of Willow Creek to Puget Sound. Continue to
maintain current sidewalk / pathway/boardwalk. For 2018, a section of the boardwalk will be
replaced. Continue to work with Friends of the Edmonds Marsh, Earthcorps and others in the
rejuvenation and management of the marsh.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: The Edmonds Marsh is a unique urban salt and fresh
water marsh with abundant habitat / wildlife species. It is a designated and protected bird
sanctuary. Protection is vital. Co -fund the completion of design of daylighting Willow Creek
using Storm Water Utility funds as defined in the comprehensive Storm Water Management
Plan, as well as grant funds available through various agencies and foundations.
SCHEDULE: 2019 - 2024
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
COST
Professional
$25000
$25,000
$25,000
$25,000
$25000
$25,000
Services
Construction
$0
$0
$0
$0
TOTAL
$25000
$25000
$25000
$25000
$25000
$25,000
a
31 Packet Pg. 111
8.A.b
PROJECT NAME: Flower Pole Replacement I ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $120,000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Replacement of Flower Poles in various places as needed
throughout City.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Replacement of Flower Poles in various places as needed
throughout City.
SCHEDULE: 2019 - 2024
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Construction
$20000
$20000
$20000
$20000
$20000
$20000
TOTAL
$20000
$20000
$20000
$20000
$20000
$20000
32 Packet Pg. 112
8.A.b
PROJECT NAME: City Park Improvements I ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $50,000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Continued pathway, access improvements and ongoing upgrades to
City Park.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Make ongoing upgrades to City Park as referenced in the
PROS plan.
SCHEDULE: 2019-2024
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
Construction
$40,000
$5,000
$
$5,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$40,000
$5,000
$
$5,000
*all or part of this project may qualify for 1 % for the arts
Q
33 Packet Pg. 113
8.A.b
PROJECT NAME: Citywide Park ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $300,000
Improvements / Misc Small Projects
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Citywide park facility and public landscaping improvements
including signage, interpretive signs, buoys, tables, benches, trash containers, drinking
fountains, backstops, bike racks, lighting, small landscaping projects, play areas and
equipment. Landscape improvements at beautification areas and corner parks, public gateway
entrances into the city and 4t" Avenue Corridor from Main St. to the Edmonds Center for the
Arts, SR 104, street tree and streetscape improvements.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Overall capital improvements for citywide park facilities
and streetscape improvements in public areas.
SCHEDULE: 2019-2024
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Planning/Study
Engineering / Administration
Construction
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
1 $50,000
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
Q
34 Packet Pg. 114
8.A.b
PROJECT NAME: Civic Center Park
".} r..�-= `�
M -'
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $12,170,000
B..
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Civic Center Improvements / Stadium Demolition As part of the
master planning process for Civic, and in consideration of the current condition of the stadium, it
is being recommended to demolish the current stadium. The City also has some grant funds
available to assist with this. In addition, the City will begin the design development process for
the completion of the master plan.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE:
The Civic Master plan was adopted in 2017. Funds will be set aside, and grant funds applied for
in order to develop the master plan. This is a high priority in the PROS plan.
SCHEDULE: 2019 - 2024
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT
COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Planning and
Study
$70,000
$1,930,000
Construction
$10,000,170
TOTAL
a
35 Packet Pg. 115
8.A.b
PROJECT NAME: Sports Field Upgrade / ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $50,000
Playground Partnerships
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Partnerships with local schools, organizations, or neighboring
jurisdictions to upgrade additional youth ball field or play facilities or playgrounds to create
neighborhood park facilities at non -City facilities.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Annual partnerships with matching funds to create
additional facilities.
SCHEDULE: 2018-2023
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Engineering &
Administration
Construction
$0
$25,000
$0
$25000
0
0
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$0
$25,000
$0
$25000
0
0
a
36 Packet Pg. 116
8.A.b
PROJECT NAME: Fishing Pier & Restrooms I ESTIMATED COST: $70,000
LWCF/IAC Acquisition and Development Project
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Fishing pier parking lot landscape improvements. Re -tile and
renovate restroom facilities.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Capital improvements to retain capital assets and
enhance western gateway to the Puget Sound.
SCHEDULE: 2019-2024
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Planning/Study
Eng. & Admin.
Construction
$20,000
$10,000
$10,000
$10,000
$10000
$10,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$20,000
$10,000
E $10,000
$10,000
$10000
$10,000
a
* all or part of this Project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts
37 Packet Pg. 117
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN DESCRIPTION
8.A.b
PROJECT NAME: Community Garden ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $155,000
1 !,]Lamm
}
ar r
} t
t �
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Locate and develop a community garden site.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This was formerly planned for the Former Woodway HS
site. This is adopted as part of the PROS plan.
SCHEDULE: 2019-2024
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT
COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
Construction
$155,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
1$155,000
a
all or a portion of this project may quality for 1 % for the Arts
38
Packet Pg. 118
8.A.b
PROJECT NAME: Maplewood Park ESTIMATED COST: $10,000
Improvements
89t" Place West and 197t" Street SW, Edmonds City limits, within Snohomish County
12.7 acres (10.7 acres Open Space & 2 acres Neighborhood Park) Zoned Public
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Improvements to the picnic, roadway, parking, play area and
natural trail system to Maplewood Park.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improvements to retain site as an asset to the
neighborhood park system.
SCHEDULE: 2019-2024
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Planning/Study
Eng. & Admin.
Construction
0
$
$5,000
$0
$5000
0
1 % for Art
TOTAL
0
$
$5,000
$0
$5000
0
* all or part of this Project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts
Q
39 Packet Pg. 119
8.A.b
PROJECT NAME: Marina Beach Park ESTIMATED COST: $8-10M
Improvements
F
1
AL ` -44�-O� _ M
l it
South of the Port of Edmonds on Admiral Way South, Edmonds City limits, Snohomish County
4.5 acres / Regional Park / Zoned Commercial Waterfront, marina beach south purchased with
federal transportation funds.
WWRC / IAC Acquisition Proiect; Protected through Deed -of -Right RCW
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
Begin development of Master plan, daylighting Willow Creek.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improvements to retain site as an asset to the regional
waterfront park system.
SCHEDULE: 2019-2024
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Planning/Study
Eng. & Admin.
Construction
$
$500,000
$500,000
$500,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$
$500,000
$500,000
$500,000
x all or part of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts.
a
40 Packet Pg. 120
8.A.b
PROJECT NAME: Mathay Ballinger Park I ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $30,000
781h Place W. & 241" St. at Edmonds City Limits. 1.5 acres/Neighborhood Park/Zoned Public.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
Improvements to Mathay Ballinger Park. This next year the City will be creating a pathway
from the park to the Interurban trail to promote both pedestrian and bicycle access to/from the
park and neighborhood.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improvements to retain site as an asset in the
neighborhood park system.
SCHEDULE: 2019-2024
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Planning/Study
Eng. & Admin.
Construction
$20,000
$0
$5,000
$0
0
0
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$20,000
$0
$5,000
$0
0
$5000
* all or part of this Project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts
a
41 Packet Pg. 121
8.A.b
PROJECT NAME: Meadowdale Clubhouse ESTIMATED COST: $5,000
Grounds
6801 N. Meadowdale Road, Edmonds City limits, within Snohomish County
1.3 acres / Neighborhood Park / Zoned RS20
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Improvements to the parking area, wooded area, trail system and
landscaping of exterior clubhouse at Meadowdale Clubhouse site.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improvements to retain site as an asset with installation
that provides community use of the facility and north Edmonds programming for day care,
recreation classes and preschool activities.
SCHEDULE: 2017-2022
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Planning/Study
Eng. & Admin.
Construction
$0
$5,000
$0
$0
0
0
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$0
$5,000
$0
$0
0
0
. all or part of this Project may qualify for 1% for the Arts
42 Packet Pg. 122
8.A.b
PROJECT NAME: Pine Ridge Park ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $10,000
Improvements
83" Avenue West and 2041h St. SW, Edmonds City Limits, within Snohomish County
22 acres (20 acres zoned openspace/2 acres neighborhood park) Zoned Public; Adopted Master Plan
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Forest improvements, habitat improvements, tree planting, wildlife
habitat attractions, trail improvements, signs, parking. Natural trail links under Main Street
connecting to Yost Park.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Retention of natural open space habitat site and regional
trail connections.
SCHEDULE: 2019-2024
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Planning/Study
Eng. & Admin.
Construction
$0
$0
$5,000
$0
$5000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
I
$0
$0
$5,000
1 $0
I
I $5,000
New additions meet the 1 % for the Arts Ordinance requirements
Q
43 Packet Pg. 123
8.A.b
PROJECT NAME: Seaview Park ESTIMATED COST: $130,000
Improvements
8011 Street West and 18611 Street SW, Snohomish County, within Edmonds City limits
5.5 acres; Neighborhood Park/ Zoned Public; Purchased and developed with LWCF funds through IAC; protected with Deed -
Of -Right
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Annual repair and upgrade to facilities and fields. Maintenance of
tennis courts, pathway improvements, and play area. Replace roof on restrooms.
Replacement of play equipment in 2019.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Site serves as neighborhood park with children's play
area, open lawn, softball/baseball fields and soccer fields, restroom facilities, basketball court,
parking and tennis courts.
SCHEDULE: 2019-2024
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Planning/Study
Eng. & Admin.
Construction
$120,000
$0
$5,000
$0
$5000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$120,000
$0
$5,000
$0
$5000
* all or part of this Project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts
0
a
U
N
a+
x
w
c
a�
E
a
44 Packet Pg. 124
8.A.b
PROJECT NAME: Waterfront Redevelopment ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $5,889,299
/ Waterfront Walkway Completion
r
• 1hY�d 1\IW 11� I
-------------------
AccvM•ov R..p
lA�6Ui.»l 2o�
Propmod Edmwids
Wam(from Garver
;r�urs;
sr-v. - .au •al
Isw45m0,: .—
r .•
__
M9gwed Tbrnpi��
bn b •..
•Y.grOn JN�
yyetln W ran p•ur� a
.
PMcFW.4 P-�
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Work with Sr. Center to renovate surrounding park, parking lot
and walkway. Remove creosote pier, reintroduce habitat for fish and wildlife. Increase access
to the waterfront to accommodate increased growth. Connect waterfront walkway from
Brackett's Landing South to Olympic Beach, including completion in front of the Ebb tide
condominiums.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Public access of waterfront and tidelands on Puget
Sound. Provide a new Senior and Community Center and provide a new beachfront walkway.
One of the top priorities in the PROS plan is to open up beachfront access.
SCHEDULE: 2019-2024
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Planning/Study
Eng. & Admin.
Construction
624,800
500,000
$0
$0
0
0
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$624,800
$500,000
$0
$0
0
0
* all or part of this Project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts
Q
45 Packet Pg. 125
8.A.b
PROJECT NAME: Yost Park / Pool ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $165,000
Improvements
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Pool replastering, tile work, and annual anticipated and
unanticipated repairs. Add in -pool play amenities. Park site improvements and repairs to trails
and bridges, picnicking facilities, landscaping, parking, tennis/pickleball courts and erosion
control. ADA improvements.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Beautiful natural area serves as upland area for
environmental education programs as well as enjoyable setting for seasonal Yost Pool users.
SCHEDULE: 2019-2024
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
Construction
$10,000
$50,000
$25,000
$30,000
$25000
$25,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$10,000
$50,000
$25,000
$30,000
$25000
$25,000
all or part of this project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts.
a
46 Packet Pg. 126
8.A.b
PROJECT NAME: City Gateway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $35,000
Replacements
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Design and construct new gateway elements at SR 104 and 5`
Ave. S and at Sunset and Main St. to replace aging and deteriorated signage. In addition, find a
new location on the north entrance to Edmonds.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: The PROS Plan, Community Cultural Plan and Streetscape
Plan all refer to the importance of these visual "gateways" to the City of Edmonds. New signage
with artistic elements will enhance the gateways and reinforce Edmonds reputation as a cultural
destination for visitors.
SCHEDULE: 2019-2024
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Repairs &
Maintenance
$0
$0
$0
$0
0
0
Construction
$35,000
TOTAL
$35000
$0
$0
$0
0
0
a
47 Packet Pg. 127
8.A.b
PROJECT NAME: Hickman Park I ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $300,000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install new restrooms at park.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE:
and is identified in the PROS plan.
This project seeks to enhance one of our busiest parks
SCHEDULE: 2019-2024
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Construction
$0
$0
$300000
$0
0
0
TOTAL
$0
$0
$300000
$0
0
0
a
48 Packet Pg. 128
8.A.b
PROJECT NAME: Outdoor Fitness Zones I ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $200,000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Create outdoor fitness zones by adding fitness equipment within
the park system.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Provide outdoor places to exercise to improve the health
and wellness of citizens and park users, which provides adults the opportunity to exercise while
their children play. This is a priority in the PROS plan.
SCHEDULE: 2019-2024
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Professional
Services
Construction
$75,000
$0
$0
$0
0
0
TOTAL
$75,000
$0
$0
$0
0
0
a
49 Packet Pg. 129
8.A.b
c
c�
a
c
m
E
m
O
L
Q
E
Q
V
a.
d
u
m
U-
.Q
V
Iq
N
O
N
On
T-
O
N
N
N
O
O_
O
L
d
t
4-
O
C
O
d
d
L
IL
m
L
IL
c�
N
a+
t
K
W
C
N
E
t
u
ca
Q
50 Packet Pg. 130
8.A.b
CIP PARKS
PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS
FUND 126 - SPECIAL CAPITAL/ PARKS
ACQUISITION
51 Packet Pg. 131
8.A.b
PROJECT NAME: Debt Service on Approved ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $988,118
Capital Projects and Acquisitions
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Approximate annual debt service payments on:
Marina Beach / Library Roof: $80,830
PSCC (Edmonds Center for the Arts): $54,300
Anderson Center Seismic Retrofit: $26,850
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Debt service to pay for approved capitol projects
SCHEDULE: 2019-2024
COST
BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Planning/Study
Eng. & Admin.
Construction
1 % for Art
Principal &
Interest
$159,868
$163,120
$165,820
$167,250
$170,080
TOTAL
$159,868
$163,120
$165,820
$167,250
$170,080
" all or part of this Project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts
Q
52 Packet Pg. 132
8.A.b
PROJECT NAME: Miscellaneous Open ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,000,000
Space / Land
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Acquisition of properties when feasible that will benefit citizens that
fit the definitions and needs identified in the Parks Comprehensive Plan.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Fulfills needs of citizens for parks, recreation and open
space.
SCHEDULE: 2019 - 2024
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT
COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Land
$0
$200,000
$200,000
$200,000
$200,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$0
$200,000
$200,000
$200,000
$200,000
53 Packet Pg. 133
8.A.b
PROJECT NAME: Waterfront Redevelopment ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $3,595,000
/ Waterfront Walkway Completion
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Redevelop waterfront to secure access to Puget Sound and
walkways along the beachfront for public use as indentified in the Parks, Recreation & Open
Space Comprehensive Plan.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Public access of waterfront and tidelands on Puget
Sound.
SCHEDULE: 2019-2024
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Planning/Study
Eng. & Admin.
Construction
$0
$0
$0
$0
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$0
$0
$0
$0
a
54 Packet Pg. 134
8.A.b
PROJECT NAME: Civic Center Development ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $510,000
/ Stadium Demolition
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Civic Center Development / Stadium Demolition.
As part of the Master planning process for Civic, and in consideration of the current condition
of the stadium, it is being recommended to demolish the current stadium. The City also has
some grant funds available to assist with this. In addition, develop a signature downtown park
at this site.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Civic Center Development / Stadium Demolition.
The Civic Master plan will be complete by early 2017. Funds will be set aside, and grant
funds applied for in order to develop the master plan. This is a high priority in the PROS plan.
SCHEDULE: 2019 - 2024
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Planning
Construction
$0
$0
$
$
TOTAL
$0
$0
$
$
a
55 Packet Pg. 135
8.A.b
CIP PARKS
PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS
FUND 332 - PARKS CONSTRUCTION
56 Packet Pg. 136
8.A.b
PROJECT NAME: Civic Center Development
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $12,170,000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Civic Center Improvements / Stadium Demolition As part of the
master planning process for Civic, and in consideration of the current condition of the stadium, it
is being recommended to demolish the current stadium. The City also has some grant funds
available to assist with this. In addition, the City will begin the design development process for
the completion of the master plan.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE:
The Civic Master plan was adopted in 2017. Funds will be set aside, and grant funds applied for
in order to develop the master plan. This is a high priority in the PROS plan.
SCHEDULE: 2019 - 2024
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Planning and
Stud
2,000,000
Construction
$
10,000,170
TOTAL
a
57
Packet Pg. 137
8.A.b
PROJECT NAME: Edmonds Marsh / Willow ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $6-8M
Creek Daylighting
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Using strategies and recommendations identified in the comprehensive
management plan, protect site from adjacent development and storm water impacts. Continue to
support day -lighting of Willow Creek to Puget Sound. Sidewalk / pathway repairs and continuation
of walkway / viewing path to the hatchery if environmentally feasible. Work with Friends of the
Edmonds Marsh, People for Puget Sound and others in the rejuvenation and management of the
marsh. This also includes planning for the outfall of Willow Creek into Marina Beach Park.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: The Edmonds Marsh is a unique urban salt and fresh water
marsh with abundant habitat / wildlife species. It is a designated and protected bird sanctuary.
Protection is vital. Co -fund the completion of a master plan using Storm Water Utility funds as
defined in the comprehensive Storm Water Management Plan. As well as grant funds available
through various agencies and foundations.
SCHEDULE: 2019-2024
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
Construction
0
0
0
$1,500,000
$1,500,000
$1,500,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$1,500,000
$1,500,000
$1,500,000
all or part of this project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts.
a
58 Packet Pg. 138
8.A.b
PROJECT NAME: Waterfront Redevelopment ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $5,889,299
/ Waterfront Walkway Completion
r
• 1hY�d 1\IW 11� I
-------------------
AccvM•ov R..p
lA�6Ui.»l 2o�
Propmod Edmwids
Wam(from Garver
;r�urs;
sr-v. - .au •al
Isw45m0,: .—
r .•
__
M9gwed Tbrnpi��
bn b •..
•Y.grOn JN�
yyetln W ran p•ur� a
.
PMcFW.4 P-�
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Work with Sr. Center to renovate surrounding park, parking lot
and walkway. Remove creosote pier, reintroduce habitat for fish and wildlife. Increase access
to the waterfront to accommodate increased growth. Connect waterfront walkway from
Brackett's Landing South to Olympic Beach, including completion in front of the Ebb tide
condominiums.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Public access of waterfront and tidelands on Puget
Sound. Provide a new Senior and Community Center and provide a new beachfront walkway.
One of the top priorities in the PROS plan is to open up beachfront access.
SCHEDULE: 2019-2024
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Planning/Study
263,581
150000
Eng. & Admin.
$130,000
70000
Construction
3,904,685
$1,371,033
$0
$0
0
0
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$4,298,266
$1,591,033
$0
$0
0
0
'all or part of this Project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts
L
a
U
N
r
x
w
r
c
a�
E
R
Q
59 Packet Pg. 139
8.A.b
PROJECT NAME: Outdoor Fitness Zones I ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $200,000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Create outdoor fitness zones by adding fitness equipment within
the park system.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Provide outdoor places to exercise to improve the health
and wellness of citizens and park users, which provides adults the opportunity to exercise while
their children play. This is a priority in the PROS plan.
SCHEDULE: 2019-2024
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Professional
Services
Construction
$100000
$100000
$0
$0
0
0
TOTAL
$100000
$100000
$0
$0
0
0
a
60 Packet Pg. 140
CFP / CIP COMPARISON (2018 TO 2019)
8.A.c
ADDED PROJECTS
FUND
PROJECT NAME
CFP
DESCRIPTION
112
76th Ave. W Overlay from 196th St. SW to Olympic View Dr.
Overlay along 76th Ave. W from 196th St. SW to Olympic View Dr., with
stormwater improvements, ADA curb ramp upgrades, and addition of flashing
beacons at existing crosswalk.
112
80th Ave. Walkway from 188th St. SW to Olympic View Dr.
Install walkway along 80th Ave. W Walkway from 188th St. SW to Olympic View
X
Dr. (also funded by Fund 422 / pending grant application response).
112
238th St. SW Island and ADA Curb Ramps
Reconstruct existing island on west side of Hwy. 99 @ 238th St. SW and upgrade
various curb ramps throughout the City (also funded by Fund 125).
112
Pavement Rating Study
Evaluation of the pavement condition of every City street , in order to determine
the future priority overlay stretches (to be completed every 3 years).
125
Frances Anderson Center Playground Replacement
lCompleted
125
Hickman Park, hillside erosion mitigation
lCompleted
125
126
Civic Park design
x
Ongoing, anticipated completion in 2020/2021
126
Waterfront Redevelopment/Ebb tide walkway design
x
Ongoing, anticipated completion in 2019/2020
126
Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Project
Complete pedestrian crossing enhancements at (9) locations throughout the City,
through the installation of flashing beacons, fully -actuated traffic signal, or HAWK
signal.
126
Guardrail installations
Install new guardrails at various locations throughout the City, since the existing
one needs to be upgraded or none currently exists.
126
2019 Pedestrian Safety Program
Complete various pedestrian improvements throughout the City.
126
Traffic Signal Upgrades
Complete traffic signal upgrades at various intersections (such as new detection
and / or new cabinets)
126
Admiral Way Crossing
Install new pedestrian crossing at the intersection of Dayton St. @ Admiral Way
with flashing beacons, bub-outs, and lighting improvements.
M
Q
tv
U
N
O
N
a�
r
0
N
m
N
0
0.
0
IL
CD
4-
0
c
0
:r
M
c
a)
N
L
a
c
O
m
u
x
r
c
0
0
�L
R
0.
E
0
U
t
K
LU
r
c
m
E
t
R
r
r
Q
Page 1 of 3 Packet Pg. 141
421 1 Annual Replacement Program (Phase 14
421 I Swedish & 76th Waterline Replacement
Estimated future costs for waterline replacements. 8.A.c
Estimated future costs for waterline replacements and replacement of existing
water meter service Swedish Edmonds.
I 421 I 2019 Waterline Overlays I I Estimated future costs for road repairs due to waterline replacements.
Ballinger Regional Facility Pre -Design
422
Preliminary Data gathering for determining feasibility for regional drainage
facility in the Lake Ballinger Basin.
Phase 1 Annual Storm Replacement Project
422
Estimated future cost for Storm pipe replacements
422
Phase 2 Annual Storm Replacement Project
Estimated future cost for Storm pipe replacements
422
Phase 3 Annual Storm Replacement Project
Estimated future cost for Storm pipe replacements
Phase 4 Annual Storm Replacement Project
422
Estimated future cost for Storm pipe replacements
Phase 5 Annual Storm Replacement Project
422
Estimated future cost for Storm pipe replacements
422
Phase 6 Annual Storm Replacement Project
Estimated future cost for Storm pipe replacements
84th Ave. W Overlay from 220th St. SW to 212th St. SW
Complete stormwater improvements as part of the 84th Ave. W Overlay from
422
220th St. SW to 212th St. SW
Elm Way Walkway from 8th Ave. S and 9th Ave. S
Install sidewalk along Elm Way from 8th Ave. S to 9th Ave. S. (pending grant
422
X
application response)
80th Ave. W Walkway from 212th St. SW to 206th St. SW
Install sidewalk along 80th Ave. W from 212th St. SW to 206th St. SW (pending
422
X
grant application response).
423
Phase 12 Sewer Replacement/Rehab/Improvements
Estimated future costs for sewerline replacements/rehab/impr.
423
2019 Sewerline Overlays
Estimated future costs for road repairs due to sewerline repl/rehab/impr.
a
U
N
O
N
CD
0
N
m
N
O
O.
O
L
IL
CD
t
4-
0
c
O
:r
.r
c
a�
N
L
a
c
O
m
u
x
r
c
O
N
�L
Q
E
O
U
t
K
W
r
C
d
E
t
v
R
r
r
Q
Page 2 of 3 Packet Pg. 142
8.A.c
UP / CIP COMPARISON (2018 TO 2019)
DELETED PROJECTS
FUND
I PROJECT NAME
CFP
I
DESCRIPTION
112
228th St. SW Corridor Improvements
X
Completed in 2018
112
236th St. SW Walkway from Edmonds Way to Madrona Elementary
X
Completed in 2018 (removed from Fund 126 as well)
112
Bike-2 Health
Completed in 2018
112
Trackside Warning System
Anticipated completion in 2018
125
Anderson Center playground
Completed
125
Civic Stadium removal
Completed
125
Veterans Plaza
Completed
125
Civic Park Storage
Anticipate completion
125
ADA Curb Ramp Improvements
Two new employees are proposed in the 2019 budget to create a concrete crew
that will construct new pedestrian curb ramps compliant with ADA standards.
This new program will replace the ADA Curb Ramp Improvements.
125
Minor Sidewalk Program
Two new employees are proposed in the 2019 budget to create a oncrete crew
that will construct short sections of missing sidewalk throughout the City. This
new program will replace the Minor Sidewalk Program.
126
Citywide Protective / Permissive Traffic Signal conversion
Completed in 2018 at (3) signalized intersections (SR-104 @ 100th Ave. W, SR-10
@ 95th PI. W, and 100th Ave. W @ 238th St. SW)
126
220th St. SW Signal Coordination from Hwy. 99 to 76th Ave. W
Anticipated completion in 2018
126
Trackside Warning System
Anticipated completion in 2018
421 2016 Replacement Program I lCompleted in 2017.
421 2017 Waterline Overlays I lCompleted in 2017.
422 Edmonds Marsh Channel Improvements I lCombined into Willow Creek Feasibility Study/Design/Construction
422 Willow Creek Pipe Rehab I lCombined into Willow Creek Feasibility Study/Design/Construction
423 1 2017 Sewerline Overlays I lCompleted in 2017.
CL
U
N
O
N
a%
r
0
N
m
N
0
0.
0
L-
a.
CD
4-
0
c
0
:r
tv
c
a�
N
N
L
a
c
0
A
m
u
x
r
c
0
N
�L
Q
E
0
U
t
K
W
r
c
m
E
t
R
r
r
Q
Page 3 of 3 Packet Pg. 143
8.6
Planning Board Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 10/10/2018
Moratorium on development of residential units without parking in BD zones
Staff Lead: Planning
Department: Planning Division
Prepared By: Rob Chave
Background/History
On August 21, 2018, the City Council adopted a moratorium on new residential units in the BD zones
that don't have any on -site parking. This issues has been referred to the Planning Board for a
recommendation.
Staff Recommendation
Discuss the issue and prepare for a public hearing in November.
Narrative
A complete application for a nine -unit apartment building in the City's Downtown Business District (BD2
zone) was recently submitted and approved under the City's existing code. The proposed development
will have no on -site vehicle parking. That is consistent with the existing code for this particular zoning
district, which states plainly: "No parking is required for any floor area in any building with a total
building footprint of less than 4,800 square feet." (See Attachment 3, highlighted in ECDC 16.43.D.3).
The code chapter applies only to the BD zones.
Note that "footprint" simply means the ground area occupied by the building. Therefore, because the 9
units were comprised of three units on each floor and the building footprint was less than 4,800 square
feet, no parking could be required. Project approval must be decided based on the existing code at the
time of application submittal.
The issue was brought to Council and a moratorium was adopted on August 21, 2018, to give the
Planning Board time to study the issue and forward a recommendation to the Council on any potential
code amendment regarding this code provision.
The exemption for residential parking in downtown BD -zoned buildings was adopted by a previous
Council over 10 years ago (2006) with the purpose of incentivizing small -footprint buildings in the
downtown area. At that time, new limits had been placed on downtown buildings regarding first floor
height and placement, requiring 12- or 15-foot first floor heights and pinning the ground floor to the
adjacent grade level. These provisions had been adopted so that the ground floor of a building was not
sunk below ground level, which had started to happen with some new development. With these new
restrictions, the Council at the time also wanted to provide incentives for property owners or developers
to build smaller -footprint buildings, thus the exemption from residential parking for building footprints
under 4,800 square feet. Since there was also no commercial parking requirement, it was possible that
Packet Pg. 144
8.B
no on -site parking need be provided. This may not have been fully appreciated at the time.
The potential for no onsite parking for a new building was recently realized with the application for a
new 9-unit residential building downtown. Other property owners on the street became aware of the
project and expressed great concern over the potential impact on the street and available parking.
Attachment 3 contains the general downtown parking provisions, highlighted in ECDC 17.50.010, that
normally require one parking space for each residential unit. Since the language in ECDC 16.43.D.3
specifies an exemption from this provision, the easiest change that would reinstate a minimum
residential parking standard for downtown development in small (4,800 SF) buildings would be to simply
delete this section. The exemption would no longer exist.
The Planning Board should discuss available options for consideration at a public hearing in November.
The Planning Board recommendation would be forwarded to the Council while the moratorium is still in
effect.
Attachments:
Attachment 1: BD Residential Parking 2018-08-21 City Council agenda item
Attachment 2: CC Minutes 2018-08-21 BD parking
Attachment 3: ECDC 16.43 BD Parking
Packet Pg. 145
8.B.a
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 08/21/2018
Moratorium on Development of Residential Units Without On -Site Vehicle Parking Space in the BD
Zoning District
Staff Lead: Shane Hope
Department: Planning Division
Preparer: Diane Cunningham
Background/History
A complete application for a nine -unit apartment building in the City's Downtown Business (BD)District
was recently submitted and approved under the City's existing code. The proposed development will
have no on -site vehicle parking. That is consistent with the existing code for this particular zoning
district, which states plainly: "No parking is required for any floor area in any building with a total
building footprint of less than 4,800 square feet." (See ECDC 16.43.D.3.) The code chapter applies only
to the BD zones.
Note that "footprint" simply means the ground area occupied by the building. Therefore, because the 9
units were comprised of three units on each floor and the building footprint was less than 4,800 square
feet, no parking could be required. Project approval must be decided based on the existing code at the
time of application submittal.
Amending a city code related to development or zoning typically takes at least 3 months to be prepared
and brought through a required public process. The required process includes:
Analysis of the issue and options to address the problem
Development of specific language for the code amendment
Review under SEPA and its timelines
Public hearings of the proposed amendment by both the Planning Board and City Council (each
with minimum 14-day public notice ahead of the hearing)
Additional meetings by the Planning Board or City Council, as needed
A 60-day notice to the state (although the state will sometimes approve an expedited notice and
review process)
Preparation or review of an ordinance by the City Attorney
Final decision by the City Council.
Sometimes the need for a code amendment --and the possibility that more development would proceed
under a problematic part of the existing code --is strong enough that the City temporarily intervenes by
adopting a limited moratorium on that type of development. That intervention is proposed with this
agenda item.
Staff Recommendation
Adopt the attached ordinance
Packet Pg. 146
8.B.a
Narrative
State law authorizes the legislative bodies of city and county governments to establish and continue
moratoria in increments of no more than 6 months, while a more permanent solution is sought. Such a
moratorium ordinance does not require a public hearing or other advance process steps. However, a
public hearing on whether to continue or change the moratorium must be held within 60 days of the
ordinance's adoption.
Moratoria are not to be considered lightly. It is a significant step that takes time and energy and should
be narrowly crafted so as to not affect other types of development.
The nine -unit apartment building recently approved without on -side parking in a BD zone may be an
anomaly. This is the first time the on -site parking exemption has been used and no new applications
have been submitted for development of housing without on -site parking in the BD zone. However,
without a moratorium or similar legislative action, if such an application were submitted before a code
amendment can be adopted to add a parking requirement, the application would be subject only to the
existing code.
The attached ordinance:
1. Precludes City acceptance of applications for new housing in the BD zone that does not have
one or more on -site parking spaces per unit; and
2. Sets a public hearing for September 25 to consider whether to continue the moratorium.
3. Has an immediate effective date and stays in place for 6 months unless certain other legislative
actions are taken to shorten or extend the time period.
Options:
A. Do not adopt a moratorium, thus allowing potential development applications to proceed under
the existing code, while a code amendment goes through the normal public process.
B. Adopt the moratorium as a temporary measure while a code amendment goes through the
normal public process and can be considered for adoption.
Attachments:
2018-08-16 Moratorium - residential without parking
Packet Pg. 147
8.B.a
CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON,
RELATING TO RESIDENTIAL UNITS IN THE BD ZONES,
ESTABLISHING AN IMMEDIATE EMERGENCY MORATORIUM
ON THE PERMITTING, SITING, ESTABLISHMENT AND
CONSTRUCTION OF ANY NEW RESIDENTIAL UNITS WITHIN
THE BD ZONES THAT DO NOT PROVIDE AT LEAST ONE
PARKING SPACE PER DWELLING UNIT, TO BE IN EFFECT UNTIL
THE CITY OF EDMONDS ADOPTS ZONING REGULATIONS
ADDRESSING SUCH USES, SETTING SIX MONTHS AS THE
EFFECTIVE PERIOD OF THE MORATORIUM, ESTABLISHING THE
DATE OF THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THE MORATORIUM AND
DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
WHEREAS, the City recently approved an application for a new 9-unit apartment
building that did not provide any vehicle parking on site; and
WHEREAS, the zoning code for the BD zones currently exempts buildings with a
footprint (not total area) of less than 4800 sq. ft. from the City's normal on -site parking
requirements; and
WHEREAS, the City considers it likely that development permit applications could
become vested soon which would permit additional residential units that would not provide on -
site parking; and
WHEREAS, the City is questioning whether this exemption should continue to be
allowed for residential buildings and residential portions of buildings; and
WHEREAS, the Edmonds City Council therefore believes a moratorium to preserve the
status quo is necessary, until the Edmonds City Council can study, hold public hearings,
deliberate, and adopt appropriate regulations to address such residential structures or units; and
WHEREAS, the Edmonds City Council does not have sufficient information to consider
the impacts of and the options to allowing additional residential structures or units that do not
provide parking; and
WHEREAS, Section 36.70A.390 of the Revised Code of Washington authorizes the City
Council to adopt an immediate moratorium for a period of up to six months without holding a
public hearing on the proposal provided that a public hearing is held within at least sixty days of
its adoption,
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to impose an immediate six-month moratorium on
the acceptance of any development permit application for the permitting, siting, establishment or
Packet Pg. 148
8.B.a
construction of any residential structures or units in the BD zones that do not provide parking on -
site; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS DOES ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Purpose. The purpose of this moratorium is to allow the City adequate
time to study the impacts associated with the permitting, siting, establishment or construction of
residential structures and units in the BD zones that do not provide parking on -site and to
consider options for imposing new requirements for residential units and their associated parking
in the BD zones. The City's goal is to ultimately draft zoning regulations to address such
structures and units in the BD zones, to hold public hearings on such draft regulations, and to
adopt such regulations.
Section 2. Moratorium Imposed. The City Council hereby imposes an immediate
six-month moratorium in the BD zones on the acceptance of all development permit applications
to permit, site, establish or construct residential structures or units that do not provide at least one
on -site parking space per residential unit. This moratorium shall apply equally to new residential
structures, residential additions to existing structures, and changes of use to residential within
existing structures.
Section 3. Duration of Moratorium. The moratorium imposed by this Ordinance shall
commence on the date of the adoption of this Ordinance. As long as the City holds a public
hearing on the moratorium and adopts findings and conclusions in support of the moratorium (as
contemplated by Section 4 herein), the moratorium shall not terminate until six (6) months after
the date of adoption, or at the time all of the events described in Section 1 have been
accomplished, whichever is sooner. The Council shall make the decision to terminate the
moratorium by ordinance, and termination shall not otherwise be presumed to have occurred.
Packet Pg. 149
8.B.a
Section 4. Public Hearing on Moratorium. Pursuant to RCW 36.70A.390 and RCW
35A.63.220, the City Council shall hold a public hearing on a moratorium within sixty (60) days
of its adoption. In this case, the hearing shall be held on September 25, 2018 unless the City
Council, by subsequently adopted resolution, provides for a different hearing date. No later than
the next Council meeting immediately following the hearing, the City Council shall adopt
findings of fact on the subject of this moratorium and either justify its continued imposition or
cancel the moratorium.
Section 5. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance
should be held to be unconstitutional or unlawful by a court of competent jurisdiction, such
invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other
section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance.
Section 6. Declaration of Emergent. The City Council hereby declares that an
emergency exists necessitating that this Ordinance take effect immediately upon passage by a
majority vote plus one of the whole membership of the Council, and that the same is not subject
to a referendum (RCW 35A.12.130). Without an immediate moratorium on the City's
acceptance of development permit applications, such applications could become vested, leading
to the construction or establishment of additional residential units in the BD zones which do not
provide on -site parking. Therefore, the moratorium must be imposed as an emergency measure
to protect the public health, safety and welfare, and to prevent the submission of applications to
the City in an attempt to vest rights for an indefinite period of time. This Ordinance does not
affect any existing vested rights.
Section 7. Publication. This Ordinance shall be published by an approved summary
consisting of the title.
Packet Pg. 150
8.B.a
Section 8. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force and
effect immediately upon passage, as set forth herein, as long as it is approved by a majority plus
one of the entire membership of the Council, as required by RCW 35A.12.130.
APPROVED:
MAYOR DAVE EARLING
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED:
CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY:
M.
JEFF TARADAY
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
PUBLISHED:
EFFECTIVE DATE:
ORDINANCE NO.
Packet Pg. 151
8.B.a
SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO.
of the City of Edmonds, Washington
On the day of , 2018, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed
Ordinance No. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting of the
title, provides as follows:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON, RELATING TO RESIDENTIAL UNITS IN
THE BD ZONES, ESTABLISHING AN IMMEDIATE
EMERGENCY MORATORIUM ON THE PERMITTING,
SITING, ESTABLISHMENT AND CONSTRUCTION OF ANY
NEW RESIDENTIAL UNITS WITHIN THE BD ZONES THAT
DO NOT PROVIDE AT LEAST ONE PARKING SPACE PER
DWELLING UNIT, TO BE IN EFFECT UNTIL THE CITY OF
EDMONDS ADOPTS ZONING REGULATIONS
ADDRESSING SUCH USES, SETTING SIX MONTHS AS THE
EFFECTIVE PERIOD OF THE MORATORIUM,
ESTABLISHING THE DATE OF THE PUBLIC HEARING ON
THE MORATORIUM AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request.
DATED this day of , 2018.
CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY
Packet Pg. 152
8.B.b
■ All property located south of 240th St. SW, between 84th Ave. W and Edmonds Way.
Change Comprehensive Plan designation from Edmonds Way Corridor to Corridor
Development (Hwy 99) (AMD20180001).
o Comprehensive Plan amendments related to the budget will occur at a later date.
Councilmember Johnson commented these amendments are proposed in anticipation of being the only
Comprehensive Plan amendment this year; however, the City has until December to adopt the amendments
and things are afoot in other areas such as the moratorium related to parking in the BD zone and the
Council's role in development review applications. She asked if any further 2018 Comprehensive Plan
amendments were anticipated through the end of the year. Development Services Director Shane Hope
answered these are the only Comprehensive Plan amendments proposed during the period that
Comprehensive Plan Amendments were accept for 2018. The exception would be anything related to the
CFP or CIP which are done during the budget process. The moratorium is not addressed in the
Comprehensive Plan as it is a zoning issue. The Council's role in development review applications would
be an amendment to zoning procedures in Title 17and possibly other sections and no Comprehensive Plan
amendment would be required.
Ms. Hope clarified zoning regulations need to be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, but that does not
mean the Comprehensive Plan contain everything that is in the zoning regulations, building code, etc. The
Comprehensive Plan can only be amended once a year with certain exceptions. Development regulations,
as long as they do not conflict with the Comprehensive Plan, can be amended at any time.
COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL, TO
ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 4123, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON, ADOPTING THE 2018 AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
4. MORATORIUM ON DEVELOPMENT OF RESIDENTIAL UNITS WITHOUT ON -SITE
VEHICLE PARKING SPACE IN THE BD ZONING DISTRICT
Development Services Director Shane Hope explained the current code does not require a building in the
Downtown Business (BD) zone with a footprint of less than 4800 square feet current code to provide onsite
parking. Most buildings have provided onsite parking in spite of the code because the developer felt it was
needed. A complete application was submitted and approved under the City's existing code. Although there
were concerns with that proposal, the application had to be approved as it met the code. The concern now
is whether other development could be proposed before the code is adjusted. A code amendment typically
takes three months due to public hearing, approval by the state, SEPA process, etc. Even though there are
no other applications for residential units without onsite parking in the BD zone, it seemed a good
precaution to propose a moratorium on new residential without at least one space per unit of onsite parking
while that issue is studied.
Councilmember Buckshnis thanked staff for acting swiftly, noting she was shocked when she received an
email that this had occurred, thinking a residential building would have to have onsite parking. She clarified
a commercial building with a footprint under 4800 would still follow the code. Ms. Hope agreed, explaining
the moratorium would only effect residential. The moratorium requires a public hearing within 60 days and
sets a date. Following the public hearing, the moratorium would continue for up to six months unless the
Council decides otherwise.
COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY-MONILLAS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER
BUCKSHNIS, TO ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 4124, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF
EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, RELATING TO RESIDENTIAL UNITS IN THE BD ZONES,
ESTABLISHING AN IMMEDIATE EMERGENCY MORATORIUM ON THE PERMITTING,
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes Q
August 21, 2018
Page 10
Packet Pg. 153
8.B.b
SITING, ESTABLISHMENT AND CONSTRUCTION OF ANY NEW RESIDENTIAL UNITS
WITHIN THE BD ZONES THAT DO NOT PROVIDE AT LEAST ONE PARKING SPACE PER
DWELLING UNIT, TO BE IN EFFECT UNTIL THE CITY OF EDMONDS ADOPTS ZONING
REGULATIONS ADDRESSING SUCH USES, SETTING SIX MONTHS AS THE EFFECTIVE
PERIOD OF THE MORATORIUM, ESTABLISHING THE DATE OF THE PUBLIC HEARING ON
THE MORATORIUM AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. MOTION CARRIED
UNANIMOUSLY.
5. CRUMB RUBBER EXTENSION OF MORATORIUM
Council President Nelson explained the City Council adopted a moratorium in December 2015 on crumb
rubber on publicly owned athletic fields within the City. The intent at that time was to extend the
moratorium until a federal study was completed by the Environmental Protection Agency Center for
Disease Control and the Consumer Product Safety Commission. A draft report, Federal Research Action
Plan on Recycled Tire Crumb Used on Playing Fields and Playgrounds, was sent to peer review in May
2018 and the next step is public comment this summer. In the meantime, he requested extending the crumb
rubber moratorium until November 15, 2018.
COUNCIL PRESIDENT NELSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY-
MONILLAS, TO ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 4125, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF
EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, EXTENDING THE PROHIBITION OF THE INSTALLATION OF
STYRENE-BUTADIENE RUBBER (ALSO KNOWN AS SBR OR "CRUMB RUBBER") ON
PUBLICLY -OWNED ATHLETIC FIELDS WITHIN THE CITY OF EDMONDS UNTIL
NOVEMBER 15, 2018; DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
Councilmember Teitzel agreed with extending the moratorium but was concerned about the proposed
extension to November 2018 because the moratorium also refers to the federal study as well as the study
by the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment in California is due to be released in mid-2019.
The California study will study fields in hot temperatures and assessing off gassing. He preferred to extend
the moratorium through June 30, 2019 to allow the California study to be completed before a decision is
made.
COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER MESAROS, TO
AMEND THE MOTION TO EXTEND THE MORATORIUM UNTIL JUNE 30, 2019.
Councilmember Johnson relayed her understanding the City was only allowed to extend a moratorium for
six months. She preferred to extend the moratorium for six months. City Attorney Tom Brubaker agreed.
COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL WITHDREW THE MOTION WITH THE AGREEMENT OF THE
SECONDER.
COUNCILMEMBER JOHNSON MOVED TO AMEND THE MOTION TO EXTEND THE
MORATORIUM FOR SIX MONTHS.
Mr. Brubaker said with this amendment, the moratorium would be extended for six months from the date
of publication, late February 2018.
Councilmember Mesaros suggested extending the moratorium from the expiration of the previous
moratorium. Mr. Brubaker advised the current moratorium expired on August 15, 2018.
Councilmember Tibbott recalled in the past he requested the Council consider excluding the school district
from the moratorium. At that time, he was concerned the federal study would not be completed by July
which in fact is the case and now the Council is considering extending the moratorium to February 2019.
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes Q
August 21, 2018
Page 11
Packet Pg. 154
Edmonds Community Development Code
Chapter 16.43 BD — DOWNTOWN BUSINESS
Chapter 16.43
BD — DOWNTOWN BUSINESS
Sections:
16.43.000
Purposes.
16.43.010
Subdistricts.
16.43.020
Uses.
16.43.030
Site development standards.
16.43.035
Design standards — BD zones.
16.43.040
Operating restrictions.
Page 1/3
16.43.000 Purposes.
The BD zone has the following specific purposes in addition to the general purposes for business and commercial
zones listed in Chapter 16.40 ECDC:
A. Promote downtown Edmonds as a setting for retail, office, entertainment and associated businesses supported by
nearby residents and the larger Edmonds community, and as a destination for visitors from throughout the region.
B. Define the downtown commercial and retail core along streets having the strongest pedestrian links and
pedestrian -oriented design elements, while protecting downtown's identity.
C. Identify supporting arts and mixed use residential and office areas which support and complement downtown retail
use areas. Provide for a strong central retail core at downtown's focal center while providing for a mixture of
supporting commercial and residential uses in the area surrounding this retail core area.
D. Focus development between the commercial and retail core and the Edmonds Center for the Arts on small-scale
retail, service, and multifamily residential uses. [Ord. 3918 § 1 (Att. 1), 2013; Ord. 3700 § 1, 2008].
16.43.010 Subdistricts.
The "downtown business" zone is subdivided into five distinct subdistricts, each intended to implement specific
aspects of the comprehensive plan that pertain to the Downtown Waterfront Activity Center. Each subdistrict contains
its own unique mix of uses and zoning regulations, as described in this chapter. The five subdistricts are:
BD 1 — Downtown Retail Core;
BD2 — Downtown Mixed Commercial;
BD3 — Downtown Convenience Commercial;
BD4 — Downtown Mixed Residential;
BD5 — Downtown Arts Corridor. [Ord. 3918 § 1 (Att. 1), 2013; Ord. 3700 § 1, 2008].
16.43.030 Site development standards.
A. Table 16.43-2.
Minimum Height
of Ground Floor
within the
Minimum Lot Minimum Lot Minimum Minimum Side Minimum Rear Maximum Designated Street
Sub District Area Width Street Setback Setback' Setback' Height2 Front°
BD15 0 0 0 0 0 30' 15'
The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code are current through Ordinance 4125, passed August 21, 2018.
Packet Pg. 155
Edmonds Community Development Code
Chapter 16.43 BD — DOWNTOWN BUSINESS
Minimum Lot Minimum Lot Minimum Minimum Side Minimum Rear Maximum
Sub District Area Width Street Setback Setback' Setback' Height2
BD2' 0 0 0 0 0 30'
BD3' 0 0 0 0 0 30'
BD4"' 0 0 0 0 0 30'
BD5' 0 0 0 0 0 25'
1 The setback for buildings and structures located at or above grade (exempting buildings
and structures entirely below the surface of the ground) shall be 15 feet from the lot line
adjacent to residentially (R) zoned property.
Specific provisions regarding building heights are contained in ECDC 16.43.030(C).
S Within the BD4 zone, site development standards listed in Table 16.43-2 apply when a
building contains a ground floor consisting of commercial space to a depth of at least 45 feet
measured from the street front of the building. If a proposed building does not meet this ground
floor commercial space requirement (e.g., an entirely residential building is proposed), then the
building setbacks listed for the RM-1.5 zone shall apply. See ECDC 16.43.030(B)(8) for further
details.
"Minimum height of ground floor within the designated street -front" means the vertical
distance from top to top of the successive finished floor surfaces for that portion of the ground
floor located within the designated street front (see ECDC 16.43.030(B)); and, if the ground
floor is the only floor above street grade, from the top of the floor finish to the top of the ceiling
joists or, where there is not a ceiling, to the top of the roof rafters. "Floor finish" is the exposed
floor surface, including coverings applied over a finished floor, and includes, but is not limited
to, wood, vinyl flooring, wall-to-wall carpet, and concrete, as illustrated in Figure 16.43-1.
Figure 16.43-1 shows an example of a ground floor height of 15 feet; note that the "finished"
ceiling height is only approximately 11 feet in this example.
5 Site development standards for single-family dwellings are the same as those specified for
the RS-6 zone.
Page 2/3
Minimum Height
of Ground Floor
within the
Designated Street
Front'
12'
12'
12'
12'
D. Off -Street Parking and Access Requirements. The parking regulations included here apply specifically within the
BD zone. Whenever there are conflicts between the requirements of this chapter and the provisions contained in
Chapter 17.50 ECDC, Off -Street Parking Regulations, the provisions of this chapter shall apply.
1. Within the BD zone, no new curb cuts are permitted along 5th Avenue or Main Street.
2. No parking is required for any commercial floor area of permitted uses located within the BD 1, BD2, BD4, and
BD5 zones.
3. No parking is required for any floor area in any building with a total building footprint of less than 4,800 square
feet.
The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code are current through Ordinance 4125, passed August 21, 2018.
Packet Pg. 156
Edmonds Community Development Code
Chapter 16.43 BD — DOWNTOWN BUSINESS
17.50.010 Off-street parking required.
C. The Downtown Business Area.
Page 3/3
1. All new buildings or additions in the downtown business area shall provide parking at a flat rate of one parking
stall for every 500 sq. ft. of gross floor area of building. If it is a mixed use building, the portions of the building
used exclusively for residential uses shall only be required to provide parking at one stall per dwelling unit. For
purposes of this chapter, "residential uses" shall refer to lobbies, stairwells, elevators, storage areas and other
similar features.
2. All existing and new uses in existing buildings are considered to comply with the parking requirements set
forth in this chapter of the code. [Ord. 3496 § 2, 2004].
The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code are current through Ordinance 4125, passed August 21, 2018.
Packet Pg. 157
9.A
Planning Board Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 10/10/2018
Review Planning Board Extended Agenda
Staff Lead: N/A
Department: Planning Division
Prepared By: Diane Cunningham
Background/History
N/A
Staff Recommendation
N/A
Narrative
The Board's current extended agenda is attached.
Attachments:
10-10-2018 PB Extended Agenda
Packet Pg. 158
Items and Dates are subject to change
pLAKN�Ng BOARD
R90 Extended Agenda
October 10, 2018
Meeting Item
OCTOBER 2018
October 10 1. Presentation on CIP /CFP 2019 — 2023
2. Presentation on proposed amendment regarding BD
parking requirements
October 24 1. Public Hearing on CIP / CFP 2019 — 2023
NOVEMBER 2018
November 1. Public Hearing on proposed Amendment to BD parking
14 requirements
2. Public Hearing on Shoreline Master Program (SMP) Update
November CANCELLED DUE TO HOLIDAY
28
DECEMBER 2018
December 1. Finalization of Recommendation on SMP Update
12 (if necessary)
December CANCELLED DUE TO HOLIDAY
26
Packet Pg. 159
9.A.a
Items and Dates are subject to change
Pending 1. Community Development Code Re -Organization
2018 2. Neighborhood Center Plans and zoning implementation, including:
✓ Five Corners
3. Further Highway 99 Implementation, including:
✓ Potential for "urban center" or transit -oriented design/development
strategies
✓ Parking standards
4. Exploration of incentive zoning and incentives for sustainable
development
Current Priorities
1. Neighborhood Center Plans & implementation.
2. Highway 99 Implementation.
Recurring 1. Annual Adult Entertainment Report (January -February as necessary)
Topics 2. Election of Officers (Vt meeting in December)
3. Parks & Recreation Department Quarterly Report (January, April, July,
October)
4. Quarterly report on wireless facilities code updates (as necessary)
Packet Pg. 160