Loading...
2018-02-06 City Council - Full Agenda-2043Agenda Edmonds City Council COUNCIL CHAMBERS 250 5TH AVE NORTH, EDMONDS, WA 98020 FEBRUARY 6, 2018, 7:00 PM Edmonds City Council Agenda February 6, 2018 Page 1 1. CALL TO ORDER/FLAG SALUTE 2. ROLL CALL 3. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA 4. APPROVAL OF THE CONSENT AGENDA 1. Approval of Council Special Meeting Minutes of January 23, 2018 2. Approval of Council Meeting Minutes of January 23, 2018 3. Approval of claim checks. 4. Acknowledge receipt of a Claim for Damages from Colleen Connolly (amount undetermined), Kirsten Johnson ($293.82), and Anna Hurd ($410.31). 5. Surplus City Computers 6. Confirmation of Soikowski Appointment to a Board or Commission 7. Confirmation of Oneill Appointment to a Board or Commission 8. Authorization for Mayor to approve recording of a 10-foot street dedication adjacent to 720 13th Way SW (PPP committee referral) 9. Authorization for Mayor to sign an Interlocal Agreement with City of Mukilteo to provide installation of slurry seals on various streets within the City of Edmonds (PPP committee referral) 10. Authorization for Mayor to sign a Supplemental Agreement with Tetra Tech for Alternative Refinement for the Lift Station #1 Basin and Flow Study (PPP committee referral) 11. Employee agreement 5. PRESENTATIONS 1. 2017 Public Defender's Annual Report (20 min) 2. Snohomish County Emergency Radio System Presentation (30 min) 3. Study of Economic Impacts of Arts and Culture (20 min) 4. Presentation of EDC Memo on BD1 Zone Ground-Floor Height (10 min) 6. AUDIENCE COMMENTS (3-MINUTE LIMIT PER PERSON) - REGARDING MATTERS NOT LISTED ON THE AGENDA AS CLOSED RECORD REVIEW OR AS PUBLIC HEARINGS 7. ACTION ITEMS 1. Authorization of Professional Services Agreement for Edmonds Marsh Study (5 min) 8. STUDY ITEMS 1. Discussion of current Council Committees and/or possible changes to those Committees (20 min) 9. REPORTS ON COUNCIL COMMITTEES Edmonds City Council Agenda February 6, 2018 Page 2 10. MAYOR'S COMMENTS 11. COUNCIL COMMENTS 12. CONVENE IN EXECUTIVE SESSION REGARDING PENDING OR POTENTIAL LITIGATION PER RCW 42.30.110(1)(I). (20 MIN.) 13. RECONVENE IN OPEN SESSION. POTENTIAL ACTION AS A RESULT OF MEETING IN EXECUTIVE SESSION. ADJOURN City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 02/6/2018 Approval of Council Special Meeting Minutes of January 23, 2018 Staff Lead: Scott Passey Department: City Clerk's Office Preparer: Scott Passey Background/History N/A Staff Recommendation Review and approve the draft meeting minutes on the Consent Agenda. Narrative N/A Attachments: Cmd012318 spec mtg 4.1 Packet Pg. 3 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes January 23, 2018 Page 1 + EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING DRAFT MINUTES JANUARY 23, 2018 Elected Officials Present Staff Present Kristiana Johnson, Councilmember none Mike Nelson, Council President Diane Buckshnis, Councilmember Dave Teitzel, Councilmember Thomas Mesaros, Councilmember Neil Tibbott, Councilmember Elected Officials Absent Adrienne Fraley-Monillas, Councilmember Dave Earling, Mayor 1. CALL TO ORDER/CONVENE IN JURY MEETING ROOM At 6:45 p.m., the City Council Special Meeting was called to order by Mayor Earling in the Council Chambers, 250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds. 2. CANDIDATE INTERVIEW FOR APPOINTMENT TO A CITY BOARD OR COMMISSION The City Council then adjourned to the Jury Meeting Room to interview Brian Potter, a candidate for appointment to the Edmonds Diversity Commission. ADJOURN At 7:01 p.m., the meeting was adjourned. 4.1.a Packet Pg. 4 Attachment: Cmd012318 spec mtg (Approval of Council Special Meeting Minutes) City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 02/6/2018 Approval of Council Meeting Minutes of January 23, 2018 Staff Lead: Scott Passey, City Clerk Department: City Clerk's Office Preparer: Scott Passey Background/History N/A Staff Recommendation Review and approve the draft meeting minutes on the Consent Agenda. Narrative N/A Attachments: 01-23-2018 Draft Council Meeting Minutes 4.2 Packet Pg. 5 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes January 23, 2018 Page 1 EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL DRAFT MINUTES January 23, 2018 ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT Dave Earling, Mayor Michael Nelson, Council President Kristiana Johnson, Councilmember Thomas Mesaros, Councilmember Diane Buckshnis, Councilmember Dave Teitzel, Councilmember Neil Tibbott, Councilmember ELECTED OFFICIALS ABSENT Adrienne Fraley-Monillas, Councilmember STAFF PRESENT Phil Williams, Public Works Director Patrick Doherty, Econ. Dev & Comm. Serv. Dir. Shane Hope, Development Services Director Mary Ann Hardie, HR Director Rob English, City Engineer Jen Machuga, Associate Planner Jeff Taraday, City Attorney Scott Passey, City Clerk Jerrie Bevington, Camera Operator Jeannie Dines, Recorder 1. CALL TO ORDER/FLAG SALUTE The Edmonds City Council meeting was called to order at 7:02 p.m. by Mayor Earling in the Council Chambers, 250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds. The meeting was opened with the flag salute. 2. ROLL CALL City Clerk Scott Passey called the roll. All elected officials were present with the exception of Councilmember Fraley-Monillas. 3. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA COUNCILMEMBER TIBBOTT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER JOHNSON, TO PULL ACTION ITEMS 6.1, 6.2 AND 6.4 FROM TONIGHT’S AGENDA FOR FURTHER DISCUSSION ON A NON-COMMITTEE NIGHT AGENDA. Councilmember Tibbott commented tonight is a committee night and he anticipated significant discussion on these topics, he preferred to move them to a non-committee meeting. He was comfortable taking action on Item 6.3 as it had been discussed last week and there was no appropriate committee to review it. Mayor Earling commented it would be preferable to know there was interest in removing those items from the agenda as there were staff members present for those items. UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION TIED (3-3), COUNCILMEMBERS JOHNSON, BUCKSHNIS AND TIBBOTT VOTING YES; AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT NELSON AND COUNCILMEMBERS MESAROS AND TEITZEL VOTING NO. MAYOR EARLING CAST THE TIE BREAKING VOTE, VOTING NO, AND THE MOTION FAILED (3-4) 4.2.a Packet Pg. 6 Attachment: 01-23-2018 Draft Council Meeting Minutes (Approval of Council Meeting Minutes) Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes January 23, 2018 Page 2 COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL, TO APPROVE THE AGENDA IN CONTENT AND ORDER. MOTION CARRIED 6-1, COUNCILMEMBER JOHNSON VOTING NO. Councilmember Johnson recommended if the Council was taking action on agenda items, the agenda should include an opportunity for public comments. COUNCILMEMBER JOHNSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO ADD AUDIENCE COMMENTS TO THE AGENDA. Mayor Earling added Audience Comments as Agenda Item 5.2 MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 4. APPROVAL OF THE CONSENT AGENDA COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER MESAROS, TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. The agenda items approved are as follows: 1. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF JANUARY 16, 2018 2. APPROVAL OF CLAIM, PAYROLL AND BENEFIT CHECKS, DIRECT DEPOSIT AND WIRE PAYMENTS. 3. ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT OF A CLAIM FOR DAMAGES FROM TEENA MORSE ($3,000.00) 4. CONFIRMATION OF BRIAN POTTER FOR APPOINTMENT TO DIVERSITY COMMISSION 5. ORDINANCE AMENDING ECC CHAPTER 1.20 RELATED TO PUBLIC RECORDS REQUEST POLICIES, AND RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE STATE DEFAULT FEES FOR ELECTRONIC RECORDS 5. PRESENTATION 1. CITY PROSECUTOR'S ANNUAL REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL HR Director Mary Ann Hardie introduced Jim Zachor, Zachor & Thomas, the City’s prosecutor. Mr. Zachor explained he began serving as the City’s prosecutor along with Jeff Goodwin in 1996. When Judge Goodwin was appointed to the bench in 2004, Zachor & Thomas was formed. Zachor & Thomas has 10 attorneys and has been located in the Sunset Building on Highway 99 for the past 11 years. Mr. Zachor introduced the three attorneys from his firm who are primary for Edmonds, Elisabeth Gribble, Patrick Lynch, and Chad Krepps. Mr. Zachor explained he does felon, drug and firearm forfeitures for Edmonds and described a recent forfeiture that he prosecuted that included $22,000, drugs, and two guns. He prosecutes forfeitures for other cities that Zachor & Thomas presents as well as represented the South Snohomish County Narcotics Task Force that was recently merged with the regional task force. He recommended the South Snohomish County Task Force be reestablished. Mr. Zachor relayed a full report would be provided in the near future; Melanie Thomas Dane was unable to complete the report before being called out of town. Zachor & Thomas represents 10 cities in Snohomish County. One of the advantages is dealing with all the police departments, forms, etc. His staff is trained in 4.2.a Packet Pg. 7 Attachment: 01-23-2018 Draft Council Meeting Minutes (Approval of Council Meeting Minutes) Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes January 23, 2018 Page 3 handling drug and alcohol DUIs. He had been hopeful the governor’s new education program would result in a decrease in DUIs but that has not happened. There are more marijuana and drug DUIs than there were in the past five years. His firm also prosecutes shoplifts; in over 60% of the shoplift arrests, the person is carrying drug paraphernalia. They are stealing so they can pawn the items for money for drugs. He commended on a fence operation in Mill Creek and efforts to find two more. Snohomish County no longer pursues shoplift cases so Zachor & Thomas prosecutes the majority of shoplift cases. Mr. Zachor commented on a unique case his staff prosecuted recently where the defendant was arrested for disorderly conduct and drug paraphernalia. The defense attorney claimed parts D and E of the five prongs for disorderly conduct were unconstitutional. In a hearing in Edmonds Municipal Court, Judge Coburn determined D was constitutional and one word in E was unconstitutional and dismissed the disorderly conduct charge, leaving only the drug paraphernalia charge. Prior to the hearing, negotiations with the public defender offered receive credit for time served if the individual pled guilty to disorderly conduct. The public defender declined the offer and requested a trial. As a result, two charges were added, harassment and obstruction of police officer. The case went to a jury trial and the individual was found guilty of paraphrenia, harassment and obstruction of a police officer. Mr. Zachor relayed a new prosecutor from Pierce County was hired recently. Rachel Hunter, who worked for Zachor & Thomas since 2009, left for private practice. Melanie Thomas Dane also prosecutes for Edmonds including reviewing reports. He reported:  99 DUIs filings in 2017  308 Other traffic (reckless, negligent) filings in 2017  446 Non-traffic (shoplift trespass, domestic violence assaults) filings in 2017  851 Total filings in 2017  923 Total filings in 2016)  DUIs at a higher rate in January 2018 than January 2017  6 firearm DUI forfeitures to date this year  Officers wrote over 4,000 traffic infractions in 2017 Mr. Zachor explained his staff prosecutes domestic violence cases even if victim no longer wants to pursue. He expressed appreciation for the City funding the Domestic Violence Coordinator position who assists with putting cases together. He commended the Edmonds Police Department for its outstanding, extremely polite officers who comply with the law, and give people every break. Chief Compaan does an outstanding job managing his staff. Councilmember Buckshnis looked forward to receiving a written report; she will forward questions to him via Ms. Hardie. 6. AUDIENCE COMMENTS Joe Scordino, Edmonds, retired fishery biologist, requested as the Council looks at the final drafting of the scope of work for the marsh study, that time for public input on deliverables, especially drafts provided by the contractor be included. He encouraged the Council to allow members of the public with knowledge and expertise to provide input on the drafts to the Council as well as to the researcher, for example the report on buffers as many in the community have studied buffers. He encouraged the Council to have the contractor collaborate with ongoing studies to realize cost efficiencies as well as sharing of information such as Pilchuck Audubon’s bird habitat study, collaborate on selecting sites for wildlife cameras, observation sites, etc. Similarly, the Students Saving Salmon and the Stream Team have established collection points for water quality and pollutant data in the marsh. If the contractor works with them and uses the same sites, the data can be used in future. The contract also specifies a meter they plan to rent; the Students Saving Salmon own that meter and can loan it to contractor at no cost. He summarized it will be 4.2.a Packet Pg. 8 Attachment: 01-23-2018 Draft Council Meeting Minutes (Approval of Council Meeting Minutes) Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes January 23, 2018 Page 4 important for the study to include the south side of the marsh although he was unsure if they would encounter difficulty with Chevron getting access to that area. It will be important to compare the south side of the marsh where there is a lot of vegetation to the north side and Harbor Square where there is less vegetation. 6. ACTION ITEMS 1. APPOINTMENT OF TREE BOARD ALTERNATE Development Services Director Shane Hope explained in accordance with the City code, each Councilmember appoints a Tree Board member and the Council President appoints an alternate. Council President Nelson has nominated Suzanne Juergensen. COUNCIL PRESIDENT NELSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO CONFIRM THE APPOINTMENT OF SUZANNE JUERGENSEN AS THE TREE BOARD ALTERNATE. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 2. GUNN STREET VACATION (FILE NO. PLN20170052) Associate Planner Jen Machuga explained the City received a petition to vacate a portion of unopened right- of-way adjacent to 10410 and 10430 231st St. SW. The location is identified on a vicinity map included in the packet as Exhibit 8. State law and City code require the City Council to consider street vacation requests in a public hearing; the public hearing date is established by resolution and cannot occur less than 20 days or more than 60 days after the passage of the resolution. Staff prepared a resolution for Council consideration (Exhibit 1), setting a hearing date of March 20, 2018. Public notice will be issued in advance of the hearing and staff will provide a report and an analysis of the proposal for the public hearing. The requested action tonight is to approve the resolution scheduling the public hearing. COUNCILMEMBER JOHNSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER MESAROS, TO ADOPT THE RESOLUTION IN EXHIBIT 1, SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING DATE OF MARCH 20, 2018. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 3. WRIA 8 (WATER RESOURCE INVENTORY AREA 8) SALMON RECOVERY Councilmember Buckshnis advised the ten-year updates will be available in the Council office. Neither she or Jason Mulvihill-Kuntz, Salmon Recovery Manager, WRIA 8, received any questions from Councilmembers following last week’s presentation. COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT NELSON, TO APPROVE THE WRIA 8 2017 PLAN UPDATE. Councilmember Tibbott inquired about the fiscal impact of the City’s participation in WRIA 8. Councilmember Buckshnis estimated the City’s contribution at $3,000-$4,000/year and offered to research and provide the exact amount to Council. Councilmember Tibbott inquired about the involvement of City staff and City Council. Councilmember Buckshnis advised staff is only involved in seeking grants. The City has submitted and been awarded funding for four grants. She serves on the grant funding team. When the plan update was developed, she reviewed it with Development Services Director Shane Hope and then-Senior Planner Kernen Lien. Other than that, she was unaware of any staff time devoted to WRIA 8. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 4.2.a Packet Pg. 9 Attachment: 01-23-2018 Draft Council Meeting Minutes (Approval of Council Meeting Minutes) Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes January 23, 2018 Page 5 4. FINALIZATION OF SCOPE AND CALENDAR FOR EDMONDS MARSH STUDY Councilmember Mesaros advised this was discussed at the previous Council meeting and he was hopeful the scope of the contract and draft calendar could be approved tonight. He referred to the calendar, noting one of the first items is to prepare a work plan which likely will alter the calendar. He referred to public comment, assuring ample time will be allowed for public comment on products developed by the consultant. Councilmember Johnson recommended including Task 5 in the initial scope of work; it is currently listed as to be determined in the future. COUNCILMEMBER JOHNSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO INCLUDE TASK 5 IN THE AMOUNT OF $14,370. Councilmember Johnson commented Task 5 is a very important element. According to the proposal, it naturally follows Task 2 and was information she eagerly looked forward to. If the funds were available, she questioned why Task 5 was to be determined. She recommended including Task 5 and if any modifications were necessary they could be taken into account in the future. Councilmember Mesaros explained as the Task Force formed its recommendation for the scope, it was their full intent to include Task 5 and 6. In conferring with the consultants, the Task Force felt more data could be added to the scope after the other tasks were completed. He referred to the proposed calendar, pointing out Task 5 begins before Task 4. The intent was to get the data from Tasks 1 and 2 first. He did not support the motion as the intent was to include Tasks 5 and 6 in the study and to return with a more comprehensive budget to accomplish those tasks. The 2018 budget includes ample funds to accomplish all tasks. Councilmember Buckshnis said Task 1 includes the east side of the marsh, assuring there will be ample information available to review. Once the information from Tasks 1 and 2 is available, the cost of Task 5 can be determined. UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION FAILED (2-4), COUNCILMEMBERS JOHNSON AND TEITZEL VOTING YES; AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT NELSON AND COUNCILMEMBERS BUCKSHNIS, MESAROS AND TIBBOTT VOTING NO. Councilmember Johnson said she received answers to a series of questions she sent to Ms. Hope and Councilmember Buckshnis and wanted to raise the questions for the record. She asked who will manage the contract. Councilmember Mesaros answered the Task Force will manage the contract. The Task Force will meet with the consultant once the contract is approved. The new Council Assistant will also assist and the Task Force may seek Ms. Hope and/or her staff’s expertise. Councilmember Johnson suggested there needed to be one point person. Councilmember Mesaros responded the Council President has requested he continue to chair the Task Force during the study; therefore, he will be the point person. Councilmember Johnson asked if there would be an oversight committee or how public comment would be obtained during the study. Councilmember Mesaros answered the intent is to develop a complete work plan that ensures ample opportunity for public comment. Councilmember Johnson suggested that be included in the scope of work and imbedded in the process. Councilmember Mesaros anticipated it would be included in the scope of work once a draft work plan is developed. Councilmember Buckshnis recalled the original proposal for a one-week turnaround was extended to two weeks to provide time for public comment. She assured the intent was to keep all Councilmembers apprised as it is a Council project. Councilmember Mesaros will be the point person. Councilmember Johnson 4.2.a Packet Pg. 10 Attachment: 01-23-2018 Draft Council Meeting Minutes (Approval of Council Meeting Minutes) Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes January 23, 2018 Page 6 commented it was good to have this discussion as none of that information was available to her. As she was not a Task Force member, she found it difficult to understand the process without this information. Councilmember Johnson suggested Shellabarger Creek be included in the modeling in Task 4. She noted there is a $2+ million project to install a pump station in an area known for tremendous flooding. Flooding has occurred for the past 40-50 years and she wanted to know if there were ecologically and fish friendly alternatives such as cleaning out the culvert and dredging a new area which require analysis and discussion. Although the City is awaiting FEMA funding, the budget includes $1.5 million for the project and this is a good opportunity to get that information before committing to that project. Councilmember Mesaros referred to the memo from Jenny Love, Windward, to Ms. Hope and a list of changes that apply to the scope of work for Task 1 – the baseline monitoring study – which indicates Shellabarger/Stella’s Marsh will be included in the baseline study. Councilmember Johnson suggested it be included in the modeling so the impact of cleaning the culvert and dredging could be modeled. She recognized daylighting of Willow Creek was 6+ years in the future but maybe something could be done sooner for Shellabarger Creek. Councilmember Buckshnis recalled the Western Washington University study specified Shellabarger and some of their data could be retested as she believed pollutants from SR-104 were a big cause of nightshade. The culverts have been cleaned out under SR-104. Councilmember Johnson suggested the water quality loggers could be donated to the Students Savings Salmon (SSS) once the study is completed and perhaps the consultant could borrow the SSS's monitor. Councilmember Mesaros assured the City would utilize any equipment that is available and any equipment that is purchased would be used for monitoring following the marsh study. Councilmember Johnson suggested coordinating the sites for taking observations. Councilmember Mesaros said the study will build on data collected from previous studies as well as make that data available for future studies. Councilmember Johnson referred to Mr. Scordino’s suggestion to collaborate with ongoing studies such as the Pilchuck Audubon observation sites. Councilmember Mesaros recalled that point was raised at the last Task Force meeting. There may be other regional studies that should be considered. Councilmember Johnson expressed appreciation for this discussion and the answers. She preferred that it be incorporated into the contract developed from the scope of work. She was accustomed to working with contracts that have much more specificity, especially around these key points. The information provided in the packet is essentially the same as was provided last week with assurances that everything will be taken care of and she preferred to see it in writing. Councilmember Buckshnis assured Ms. Love and Mr. Scordino have been in contact about the data loggers. One of the first tasks is a white paper/summary that identifies previous efforts including Western Washington University, WRIA 8, Shannon Wilson, SSS, etc.; all the studies that have been done in past and anticipated in the future will be part of the first phase so the contractor and the Council knows about all the data. She was certain everything will be shared, noting that Ron Gouguet, Windward, used to work with Dr. Mearns at NOAA. Councilmember Johnson suggested meeting dates be shared with the Council so the public and/or Councilmembers have an opportunity to observe. Councilmember Mesaros commented a contract has not yet been presented. The memo from Ms. Love to Ms. Hope refines the scope of work, budget and schedule. The original scope of work was a 3-year study which has been refined to 14 months to reduce the budget. More information will be provided as the process progresses. 4.2.a Packet Pg. 11 Attachment: 01-23-2018 Draft Council Meeting Minutes (Approval of Council Meeting Minutes) Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes January 23, 2018 Page 7 Councilmember Johnson asked if the Council would have an opportunity to review contract. Councilmember Mesaros assured the Council will approve the contract. Tonight is approval of the scope of work and budget and the City Attorney will develop a contract. City Attorney Jeff Taraday asked for clarification whether the contract will be returned to the City Council for authorization. Councilmember Mesaros answered yes. Councilmember Teitzel referred to Exhibit 1, Schedule and Timeline, pointing out Daylighting Willow Creek is shown as July to October 2019 and a footnote states it is assumed the Willow Creek daylighting project will be implemented in summer 2019 and that one additional year field data will be collected after that project has been completed. As all the funding for that project has not been collected, he doubted it would be completed in that timeframe. He asked if the consultant would be retained for another year and how that affected the cost of the contract. Councilmember Mesaros referred to the updated project schedule, advising the consultant was informed in late December that the daylighting of Willow Creek likely not take place in 2019 so it was not included in the updated schedule. Councilmember Teitzel referred to the updated project schedule and Task 4, Analyze Impacts from Daylighting Willow Creek using REA/HEA model scheduled January – February 2019. He suggested completing that modeling sooner. Councilmember Mesaros answered the intent is to build on the other data and the consultant recommended doing the other tasks first so that information can be included in the modeling. Councilmember Buckshnis suggested extending the study from May 31 to July 31, 2019. She was hopeful the gate could be left open as much as possible during the winter months anticipating that would have a large impact on spring/summer activity of the marsh. Councilmember Mesaros suggested as the start date of the study was unknown, extending the study for two months. COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER MESAROS, TO EXTEND THE STUDY FROM 14 MONTHS TO 16 MONTHS. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. COUNCILMEMBER JOHNSON MOVED TO INCORPORATE ALL THE DISCUSSION, NOTES AND ANSWERS INTO THE SCOPE OF WORK SO THERE IS A TRACKING SYSTEM RATHER THAN JUST THE ASSURANCES THAT IT WILL BE LOOKED INTO IN THE FUTURE. MOTION FAILED FOR LACK OF A SECOND. Councilmember Johnson commented there has been a lot of discussion but no update to the scope of work. COUNCILMEMBER JOHNSON MOVED BASED ON THE DISCUSSION TONIGHT AND AT LAST WEEK’S COUNCIL MEETING, THAT THE LEADER OF THE PROJECT REVISE THE SCOPE TO REFLECT THE COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS THAT HAVE BEEN MADE ABOUT ASPECTS OF THE SCOPE. MOTION DIED FOR LACK OF A SECOND. MAIN MOTION CARRIED (5-1), COUNCILMEMBER JOHNSON VOTING NO. Councilmember Mesaros requested Mr. Taraday finalize the contract for approval on the February 6 Council agenda. 7. ADJOURN TO COMMITTEE MEETINGS With no further business, the Council meeting was adjourned to committee meetings at 8:08 p.m. (Parks, Planning & Public Works Committee in the Jury Meeting Room, Finance Committee in Council Chambers and Public Safety & Personnel Committee in the Police Training Room.) 4.2.a Packet Pg. 12 Attachment: 01-23-2018 Draft Council Meeting Minutes (Approval of Council Meeting Minutes) City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 02/6/2018 Approval of claim checks. Staff Lead: Scott James Department: Administrative Services Preparer: Nori Jacobson Background/History Approval of claim checks #229463 though #229470 dated January 19, 2018 for $178,890.14. Approval of claim checks #229471 through #229592 dated January 25, 2018 for $969,242.60. Approval of reissue of claim checks #229593 through #229594 dated January 25, 2018 for $16,599.00. Approval of claim checks #229595 through #229675 dated February 1, 2018 for $158,053.88. Approval of payroll direct deposit and checks #63144 through #63152 for $550891.93, benefit checks #63153 through #63157 and wire payments of $518,045.29 for the pay period January 16, 2018 through January 31, 2018. Staff Recommendation Approval of claim checks. Narrative In accordance with the State statutes, City payments must be approved by the City Council. Ordinance #2896 delegates this approval to the Council President who reviews and recommends either approval or non-approval of expenditures. Attachments: 02-01-18 Voucher Listing claim cks 01-19-18 claim cks 01-25-18 Copy of FrequentlyUsedProjNumbers (003) Reissue Voucher List 01-25-18 02-01-18 Payroll 4.3 Packet Pg. 13 01/31/2018 Voucher List City of Edmonds 1 2:17:41PM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 229595 2/1/2018 041695 3M XAM3522 TP12416 TRAFFIC - RED EC FILM 30" X 50YD Traffic - Red EC Film 30" x 50YD 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 285.00 10.3% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 29.36 Total : 314.36 229596 2/1/2018 076459 ACHESON, CAROLYN 1/26 REFUND 1/26 REFUND CLASS CANCELLATION 1/26 REFUND CLASS CANCELLATION 001.000.239.200 10.50 Total : 10.50 229597 2/1/2018 065568 ALLWATER INC 012418051 WWTP: 1/24/18 DRINK WATER SERVICE 1/.24/18 Water services, rental & 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 15.90 10.3% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 1.64 Total : 17.54 229598 2/1/2018 073620 ALLWEST UNDERGROUND INC 70863 SEWER - SHORING EQUIPMENT RENTAL Sewer - Shoring Equipment Rental 423.000.75.535.80.45.00 36.36 7.7% sales tax 423.000.75.535.80.45.00 2.80 Total : 39.16 229599 2/1/2018 063862 ALPINE PRODUCTS INC TM-173378 TRAFFIC - SIGN POSTS, SUPPLIES Traffic - Sign Posts, Supplies 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 536.70 Freight 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 90.60 10.3% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 64.61 Total : 691.91 1Page: 4.3.a Packet Pg. 14 Attachment: 02-01-18 Voucher Listing (Approval of claim checks.) 01/31/2018 Voucher List City of Edmonds 2 2:17:41PM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 229600 2/1/2018 074306 AMWINS GROUP BENEFITS INC 5159487 FEB 2018 RETIREE PREMIUMS Barnard, Cooper and Weinz 617.000.51.517.20.23.10 1,161.12 All others 009.000.39.517.20.23.10 8,160.69 Total : 9,321.81 229601 2/1/2018 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 1990547832 WWTP UNIFORMS, TOWELS, & MATS WWTP UNIFORMS 423.000.76.535.80.24.00 5.10 WWTP TOWELS & MATS 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 115.98 10.3% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.24.00 0.53 10.3% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 11.94 PARKS MAINT UNIFORM SERVICE1990547833 PARKS MAINT UNIFORM SERVICE 001.000.64.576.80.24.00 77.27 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS1990551699 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS 001.000.65.518.20.41.00 1.61 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS 111.000.68.542.90.41.00 6.11 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 6.11 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS 422.000.72.531.90.41.00 6.11 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS 423.000.75.535.80.41.00 6.11 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 6.08 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.65.518.20.41.00 0.17 10.3% Sales Tax 2Page: 4.3.a Packet Pg. 15 Attachment: 02-01-18 Voucher Listing (Approval of claim checks.) 01/31/2018 Voucher List City of Edmonds 3 2:17:41PM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 229601 2/1/2018 (Continued)069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 111.000.68.542.90.41.00 0.63 10.3% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 0.63 10.3% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.41.00 0.63 10.3% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.41.00 0.63 10.3% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 0.62 FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS & MATS1990551700 FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS 511.000.77.548.68.24.00 5.68 FLEET DIVISION MATS 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 18.40 10.3% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.24.00 1.30 10.3% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 1.18 Total : 272.82 229602 2/1/2018 070305 AUTOMATIC FUNDS TRANSFER 98663 OUT SOURCING OF UTILITY BILLS UB Outsourcing area #500 Printing 422.000.72.531.90.49.00 37.28 UB Outsourcing area #500 Printing 421.000.74.534.80.49.00 37.28 UB Outsourcing area #500 Printing 423.000.75.535.80.49.00 38.41 UB Outsourcing area #500 Postage 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 133.45 UB Outsourcing area #500 Postage 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 133.44 10.1 % Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.49.00 3.77 10.1 % Sales Tax 3Page: 4.3.a Packet Pg. 16 Attachment: 02-01-18 Voucher Listing (Approval of claim checks.) 01/31/2018 Voucher List City of Edmonds 4 2:17:41PM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 229602 2/1/2018 (Continued)070305 AUTOMATIC FUNDS TRANSFER 421.000.74.534.80.49.00 3.77 10.1 % Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.49.00 3.87 OUT SOURCING OF UTILITY BILLS98819 UB Outsourcing area #600 Printitng 422.000.72.531.90.49.00 51.12 UB Outsourcing area #600 Printitng 421.000.74.534.80.49.00 51.12 UB Outsourcing area #600 Printitng 423.000.75.535.80.49.00 52.67 UB Outsourcing area #600 Postage 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 128.89 UB Outsourcing area #600 Postage 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 128.89 10.1 % Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.49.00 5.17 10.1 % Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.49.00 5.17 10.1 % Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.49.00 5.31 Total : 819.61 229603 2/1/2018 001801 AUTOMATIC WILBERT VAULT CO 52879 ROUGH BOX - LITETE ROUGH BOX - LITETE 130.000.64.536.20.34.00 493.00 Total : 493.00 229604 2/1/2018 075217 BASLER, TONY 24449 SPANISH INTERPRETER COURT 01/26/2018 SPANISH INTERPRETER COURT 01/26/2018 001.000.23.512.50.41.01 107.64 Total : 107.64 229605 2/1/2018 076260 BELAIR, ROGER 6362 6363 PICKLE-BAL 6362 6363 PICKLE-BALL CLINIC INSTRUCTION 6362 PICKLE-BALL CLINIC INSTRUCTION 001.000.64.571.25.41.00 75.00 4Page: 4.3.a Packet Pg. 17 Attachment: 02-01-18 Voucher Listing (Approval of claim checks.) 01/31/2018 Voucher List City of Edmonds 5 2:17:41PM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 229605 2/1/2018 (Continued)076260 BELAIR, ROGER 6363 PICKLE-BALL CLINIC INSTRUCTION 001.000.64.571.25.41.00 75.00 Total : 150.00 229606 2/1/2018 067594 BROWN, MICHAEL BC94818 SICK LEAVE BUYBACK REIMBURSEMENT FOR 14.65 UNPAID FMLA 422.000.72.531.70.11.00 196.84 Total : 196.84 229607 2/1/2018 076240 CADMAN MATERIALS INC 5484021 ROADWAY - ASPHALT Roadway - Asphalt 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 251.30 10.0% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 25.13 ROADWAY - ASPHALT5484352 Roadway - Asphalt 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 322.10 10.0% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 32.21 ROADWAY - ASPHALT5484694 Roadway - Asphalt 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 250.70 10.0% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 25.07 STORM DUMP FEES5485952 Storm Dump Fees 422.000.72.531.10.49.00 1,022.00 STORM DUMP FEES5487114 Storm Dump Fees 422.000.72.531.10.49.00 630.00 Total : 2,558.51 229608 2/1/2018 073029 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES 18203147 INV#18203147 - EDMONDS PD IR6255 COPIER RENT 01/01-01/31/18 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 151.87 5Page: 4.3.a Packet Pg. 18 Attachment: 02-01-18 Voucher Listing (Approval of claim checks.) 01/31/2018 Voucher List City of Edmonds 6 2:17:41PM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 229608 2/1/2018 (Continued)073029 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES B/W METER USE 12/1-12/31/17 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 47.14 IR3325I COPIER RENT 01/01-01/31/18 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 60.70 B/W METER USE 12/1-12/31/17 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 8.52 COLOR METER USE 12/1-12/31/17 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 63.49 IRC5240 COPIER RENT 01/01-01/31/18 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 160.00 B/W METER USE 12/1-12/31/17 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 16.63 COLOR METER USE 12/1-12/31/17 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 123.98 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 65.13 ENGINEERING COPIER - JANUARY 201818206919 Engineering Copier - January 2018 001.000.67.518.21.45.00 696.43 Total : 1,393.89 229609 2/1/2018 069457 CITY OF EDMONDS E7JA.ENG20180024 E7JA.ENG20180024 ROW PERMIT E7JA.ENG20180024 421.000.74.594.34.65.41 135.00 Total : 135.00 229610 2/1/2018 065683 CORRY'S FINE DRY CLEANING Jan 2018 DRY CLEANING DEC/JAN - EDMONDS PD CLEANING/LAUNDRY DEC/JAN 2018 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 543.84 Total : 543.84 229611 2/1/2018 075648 COVICH-WILLIAMS CO INC 0301764-IN UNIT 47 - PART Unit 47 - Part 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 24.51 10.3% Sales Tax 6Page: 4.3.a Packet Pg. 19 Attachment: 02-01-18 Voucher Listing (Approval of claim checks.) 01/31/2018 Voucher List City of Edmonds 7 2:17:41PM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 229611 2/1/2018 (Continued)075648 COVICH-WILLIAMS CO INC 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 2.52 Total : 27.03 229612 2/1/2018 006200 DAILY JOURNAL OF COMMERCE 3332947 RFP LEGAL AD FOR CONCESSIONS IN PARKS RFP LEGAL AD FOR CONCESSIONS IN PARKS 001.000.64.571.22.41.40 160.00 E5KA.INVITATION FOR BIDS3333011 E5KA.Invitation for Bids 421.000.74.594.34.65.41 556.00 Total : 716.00 229613 2/1/2018 006635 DEPT OF LICENSING 0047591 RICHARDSON.PE LICENSE RENEWAL Richardson.PE License Renewal 001.000.67.518.21.49.00 116.00 Total : 116.00 229614 2/1/2018 063037 EARLING, DAVE 013018 AWC ACTION DAYS mileage for travel to and from State 001.000.21.513.10.43.00 87.20 Total : 87.20 229615 2/1/2018 008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION 3-01808 LIFT STATION #11 6807 157TH PL SW / METE LIFT STATION #11 6807 157TH PL SW / 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 47.59 CLUBHOUSE 6801 N MEADOWDALE RD / METER 73-03575 CLUBHOUSE 6801 N MEADOWDALE RD / METER 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 348.49 HAINES WHARF PARK DRINKING FOUNTAIN3-07490 HAINES WHARF PARK DRINKING FOUNTAIN 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 96.88 LIFT STATION #12 16100 75TH AVE W / METE3-07525 LIFT STATION #12 16100 75TH AVE W / 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 47.59 LIFT STATION #15 7701 168TH ST SW / METE3-07709 LIFT STATION #15 7701 168TH ST SW / 7Page: 4.3.a Packet Pg. 20 Attachment: 02-01-18 Voucher Listing (Approval of claim checks.) 01/31/2018 Voucher List City of Edmonds 8 2:17:41PM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 229615 2/1/2018 (Continued)008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 47.59 LIFT STATION #4 8313 TALBOT RD / METER 23-09350 LIFT STATION #4 8313 TALBOT RD / METER 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 96.88 LIFT STATION #10 17612 TALBOT RD / METER3-09800 LIFT STATION #10 17612 TALBOT RD / 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 47.59 LIFT STATION #9 8001 SIERRA DR / METER 63-29875 LIFT STATION #9 8001 SIERRA DR / METER 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 47.59 SPRINKLER FOR RHODIES 18410 92ND AVE W3-38565 SPRINKLER FOR RHODIES 18410 92ND AVE W 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 47.59 Total : 827.79 229616 2/1/2018 009350 EVERETT DAILY HERALD EDH792141 E6JC.SEPA ADVERTISEMENT E6JC.SEPA Advertisement 421.000.74.594.34.65.41 46.44 RFP LEGAL AD FOR CONCESSIONS IN PARKSEDH792608 RFP LEGAL AD FOR CONCESSIONS IN PARKS 001.000.64.571.22.41.40 65.36 E5KA.INVITATION FOR BIDSEDH792909 E5KA.Invitation for Bids 421.000.74.594.34.65.41 230.48 Total : 342.28 229617 2/1/2018 076458 EWBANK, TOM 1/22 REFUND 1/22 REFUND DAMAGE DEPOSIT 1/22 REFUND DAMAGE DEPOSIT 001.000.239.200 200.00 Total : 200.00 229618 2/1/2018 076449 FAST, SAMANTHA 1/11-1/25 GYM ATTEND 1/11-1/25/18 VOLLEYBALL GYM ATTENDANT 1/11-1/25/18 VOLLEYBALL GYM ATTENDANT 001.000.64.571.25.41.00 103.50 1/16-1/30/18 VOLLEYBALL GYM ATTENDANT1/16-1/30 GYM ATTEND 8Page: 4.3.a Packet Pg. 21 Attachment: 02-01-18 Voucher Listing (Approval of claim checks.) 01/31/2018 Voucher List City of Edmonds 9 2:17:41PM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 229618 2/1/2018 (Continued)076449 FAST, SAMANTHA 1/16-1/30/18 VOLLEYBALL GYM ATTENDANT 001.000.64.571.25.41.00 103.50 Total : 207.00 229619 2/1/2018 011900 FRONTIER 253-007-4989 SEAVIEW RESERVOIR TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE SEAVIEW RESERVOIR TELEMETRY CIRCUIT 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 31.09 TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINES253-012-9166 TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINES 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 162.50 TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINES 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 301.79 TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE253-014-8062 TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 19.85 TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 36.86 TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE253-017-4360 TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 46.98 TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 87.24 CIVIC CENTER ELEVATOR PHONE LINE425-712-8347 CIVIC CENTER ELEVATOR PHONE LINE 250 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 69.69 MEADOWDALE PRESCHOOL425-745-3335 MEADOWDALE PRESCHOOL INTERNET 001.000.64.571.29.42.00 71.98 FIRE STATION #16 ALARM AND FAX LINES425-771-0158 FIRE STATION #16 ALARM AND FAX LINES 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 133.36 LIFT STATION #2 VG SPECIAL ACCESS LINE509-022-0049 LIFT STATION #2 VG SPECIAL ACCESS LINE 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 26.40 9Page: 4.3.a Packet Pg. 22 Attachment: 02-01-18 Voucher Listing (Approval of claim checks.) 01/31/2018 Voucher List City of Edmonds 10 2:17:41PM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total : 987.74 229619 2/1/2018 011900 011900 FRONTIER 229620 2/1/2018 065055 HANSON, TODD AR93613 SICK LEAVE BUYBACK REIMBURSEMENT FOR 12/25 & 12/26 111.000.68.544.70.11.00 222.92 REIMBURSEMENT FOR 1/1 HOLIDAY. TL 111.000.68.544.70.11.00 111.46 Total : 334.38 229621 2/1/2018 010900 HD FOWLER CO INC I4731190 WATER INVENTORY # 0435 - Water Inventory # 0435 - 421.000.74.534.80.34.20 2,190.24 Water - Quick Joints 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 1,290.64 10.3% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.34.20 225.59 10.3% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 132.94 Total : 3,839.41 229622 2/1/2018 074086 HEARING, SPEECH & DEAF CENTER 9028 P&R: ASL INTERPRETER P&R: ASL INTERPRETER 001.000.64.571.22.41.00 160.00 Total : 160.00 229623 2/1/2018 013140 HENDERSON, BRIAN 10 REIMBURSEMENT Reimbursement 009.000.39.517.20.23.00 1,320.00 Total : 1,320.00 229624 2/1/2018 074331 HOVICK, JAMES 13 REIMBURSEMENT Reimbursement 009.000.39.517.20.23.00 1,887.00 Total : 1,887.00 229625 2/1/2018 066256 IMSA NW CERTIFICATION Cert Renewal CERTIFICATION RENEWAL D BROWNING Certification Renewal D Browning 10Page: 4.3.a Packet Pg. 23 Attachment: 02-01-18 Voucher Listing (Approval of claim checks.) 01/31/2018 Voucher List City of Edmonds 11 2:17:41PM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 229625 2/1/2018 (Continued)066256 IMSA NW CERTIFICATION 111.000.68.542.90.49.00 40.00 Total : 40.00 229626 2/1/2018 073548 INDOFF INCORPORATED 3059203 WWTP: PENS pens 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 7.24 10.3% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 0.75 Total : 7.99 229627 2/1/2018 068712 INSITUFORM TECHNOLOGIES LLC E4GB.Ret Release E4GB.RETAINAGE RELEASE E4GB.Retainage Release 423.200.223.400 32,231.09 Total : 32,231.09 229628 2/1/2018 014940 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS 300-10035987 UNIT 438 - SUPPLIES Unit 438 - Supplies 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 47.70 10.3% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 4.91 Total : 52.61 229629 2/1/2018 075646 K-A GENERAL CONST CONTRACTOR E6MA.Pmt 7 E6MA.PMT 7 THRU 12/31/17 E6MA.Pmt 7 thru 12/31/17 332.000.64.594.76.65.00 11,633.94 E6MA.Ret 7 332.000.223.400 -527.38 Total : 11,106.56 229630 2/1/2018 072650 KCDA PURCHASING COOPERATIVE 300249465 INV#300249465 ACCT#100828 - EDMONDS PD HON HIGH BACK CHAIR (SGT DESK) 001.000.41.521.22.35.00 429.88 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.22.35.00 44.28 Total : 474.16 11Page: 4.3.a Packet Pg. 24 Attachment: 02-01-18 Voucher Listing (Approval of claim checks.) 01/31/2018 Voucher List City of Edmonds 12 2:17:41PM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 229631 2/1/2018 067877 KINGSTON LUMBER SUPPLY COMPANY 126624 TRAFFIC - 4X4'S FOR SIGN POSTS Traffic - 4x4's for Sign Posts 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 1,667.23 10.3% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 171.72 Total : 1,838.95 229632 2/1/2018 017050 KWICK'N KLEEN CAR WASH 01102018-2 CITY CAR WASH City Car Wash 511.000.77.548.68.48.00 5.06 Total : 5.06 229633 2/1/2018 017135 LANDAU ASSOCIATES INC 40580 TO 17-05.LORIAN WOODS SLIDE TO 17-05.Lorian Woods Slide 001.000.62.524.20.41.00 500.00 TO 17-05.Lorian Woods Slide 001.000.67.518.21.41.00 500.00 Total : 1,000.00 229634 2/1/2018 074417 LAW OFFICE OF CHRISTIAN SMITH 149 CONFLICT COUNSEL 7Z0651677 CONFLICT COUNSEL 7Z0651677 001.000.39.512.52.41.00 300.00 CONFLICT COUNSEL 7Z0781488150 CONFLICT COUNSEL 7Z0781488 001.000.39.512.52.41.00 300.00 Total : 600.00 229635 2/1/2018 076456 LEHRHOFF, CARL GRANT 6267 LAUGH YOUR WAY 6267 LAUGH YOUR WAY TO WELLNESS INSTRUCT 6267 LAUGH YOUR WAY TO WELLNESS 001.000.64.571.22.41.00 30.00 Total : 30.00 229636 2/1/2018 075159 LIFE INSURANCE CO OF NO AMER Cigna 02/18 FEBRUARY 2018 CIGNA PREMIUMS February 2018 Cigna Insurance Premiums 811.000.231.550 11,653.13 Total : 11,653.13 12Page: 4.3.a Packet Pg. 25 Attachment: 02-01-18 Voucher Listing (Approval of claim checks.) 01/31/2018 Voucher List City of Edmonds 13 2:17:41PM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 229637 2/1/2018 067631 LODESTAR COMPANY INC 147372 WWTP: HEATER PROBLEM SERVICE HEATER PROBLEM SERVICE 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 316.00 10.3% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 32.55 Total : 348.55 229638 2/1/2018 069053 MICRO COM SYSTEMS LTD 17061 FILE SCANNING FILE SCANNING 001.000.62.524.10.41.00 2,081.08 Total : 2,081.08 229639 2/1/2018 070028 MPA 01252018 MPA ANNUAL DUES OMAR GAMEZ MPA ANNUAL DUES OMAR GAMEZ 001.000.23.523.30.49.00 40.00 Total : 40.00 229640 2/1/2018 069471 NATIONAL LAW ENFORCEMENT, TRAINING CENTERLVNR INST GAGNER LVNR INSTRUCTOR TRAINING - GAGNER - EDMO COURSE FEE - LVNR INST - GAGNER 001.000.41.521.40.49.00 300.00 Total : 300.00 229641 2/1/2018 025690 NOYES, KARIN 000 00 795 HPC MEETING NOTES 1/11/18 HPC MEETING NOTES 1/11/18 001.000.62.558.60.41.00 126.50 Total : 126.50 229642 2/1/2018 065720 OFFICE DEPOT 997347142002 FAC MAINT CITY WIDE MAT REPLACEMENTS Fac Maint City Wide Mat Replacements 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 257.36 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 26.51 PROBATION SUPPLIES998147716001 PROBATION SUPPLIES 001.000.23.523.30.31.00 8.04 10.3% Sales Tax 13Page: 4.3.a Packet Pg. 26 Attachment: 02-01-18 Voucher Listing (Approval of claim checks.) 01/31/2018 Voucher List City of Edmonds 14 2:17:41PM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 229642 2/1/2018 (Continued)065720 OFFICE DEPOT 001.000.23.523.30.31.00 0.83 COURT SUPPLIES998374872001 COURT SUPPLIES 001.000.23.512.50.31.00 59.13 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.23.512.50.31.00 6.10 P&R ACCOUNT 90520437998729232001 PM: OFFICE SUPPLIES FILES, CARTRIDGES, 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 329.50 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 33.94 Total : 721.41 229643 2/1/2018 072739 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 3685-324130 UNIT 23 - AIR FILTER Unit 23 - Air Filter 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 11.08 10.3% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 1.14 UNIT 23 - SUPPLIES3685-324136 Unit 23 - Supplies 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 84.30 10.3% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 8.68 UNIT 23 - TRACK BAR3685-324180 Unit 23 - Track Bar 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 98.36 10.3% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 10.13 UNIT 23 - BALL JOINT3685-324208 Unit 23 - Ball Joint 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 34.45 10.3% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 3.55 FLEET RETURN UNIT 23 - SUPPLIES3685-324218 Fleet Return Unit 23 - Supplies 14Page: 4.3.a Packet Pg. 27 Attachment: 02-01-18 Voucher Listing (Approval of claim checks.) 01/31/2018 Voucher List City of Edmonds 15 2:17:41PM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 229643 2/1/2018 (Continued)072739 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 -30.68 10.3% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 -3.16 Total : 217.85 229644 2/1/2018 027060 PACIFIC TOPSOILS 18-T1031350 PM YARD WASTE DUMP CUST # 5130 PM YARD WASTE DUMP 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 96.00 PM YARD WASTE DUMP CUST # 513018-T1031363 PM YARD WASTE DUMP 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 84.00 PM YARD WASTE DUMP CUST # 513018-T1031408 PM YARD WASTE DUMP 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 96.00 PM YARD WASTE DUMP CUST # 513018-T1031416 PM YARD WASTE DUMP 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 96.00 PM YARD WASTE DUMP CUST # 513018-T1031432 PM YARD WASTE DUMP 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 96.00 Total : 468.00 229645 2/1/2018 075183 PETERSON FRUIT CO 376344 JAN 2017 WELLNESS FRUIT AUTUMN GLORY, TAYLOR GOLD, RED SEEDLESS 001.000.22.518.10.49.00 103.55 Total : 103.55 229646 2/1/2018 046900 PUGET SOUND ENERGY 200000704821 FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER 700 MAIN ST / ME FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER 700 MAIN ST / 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 1,952.34 YOST PARK/POOL 9535 BOWDOIN WAY / METER200002411383 YOST PARK/POOL 9535 BOWDOIN WAY / METER 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 156.84 OLD PUBLIC WORKS 200 DAYTON ST / METER 0200007876143 OLD PUBLIC WORKS 200 DAYTON ST / METER 15Page: 4.3.a Packet Pg. 28 Attachment: 02-01-18 Voucher Listing (Approval of claim checks.) 01/31/2018 Voucher List City of Edmonds 16 2:17:41PM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 229646 2/1/2018 (Continued)046900 PUGET SOUND ENERGY 421.000.74.534.80.47.00 447.85 FIRE STATION #16 8429 196TH ST SW / METE200009595790 FIRE STATION #16 8429 196TH ST SW / 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 876.25 FIRE STATION #20 23009 88TH AVE W / METE200011439656 FIRE STATION #20 23009 88TH AVE W / 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 309.10 CIVIC CENTER 250 5TH AVE N / METER 00052200016558856 CIVIC CENTER 250 5TH AVE N / METER 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 327.62 FIRE STATION #17 275 6TH AVE N / METER 0200016815843 FIRE STATION #17 275 6TH AVE N / METER 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 1,072.70 FLEET MAINTENANCE BAY 21105 72ND AVE W /200017676343 FLEET MAINTENANCE BAY 21105 72ND AVE W 511.000.77.548.68.47.00 536.84 MEADOWDALE CLUBHOUSE 6801 N MEADOWDALE R200019375639 MEADOWDALE CLUBHOUSE 6801 N MEADOWDALE 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 239.42 SNO-ISLE LIBRARY 650 MAIN ST / METER 001200019895354 SNO-ISLE LIBRARY 650 MAIN ST / METER 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 274.59 PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ST SW / METE200020415911 PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ST SW / 001.000.65.518.20.47.00 28.63 PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ST SW / 111.000.68.542.90.47.00 108.79 PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ST SW / 421.000.74.534.80.47.00 108.79 PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ST SW / 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 108.79 PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ST SW / 511.000.77.548.68.47.00 108.79 PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ST SW / 422.000.72.531.90.47.00 108.76 16Page: 4.3.a Packet Pg. 29 Attachment: 02-01-18 Voucher Listing (Approval of claim checks.) 01/31/2018 Voucher List City of Edmonds 17 2:17:41PM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 229646 2/1/2018 (Continued)046900 PUGET SOUND ENERGY CITY PARK BUILDING 600 3RD AVE S / METER200024711901 CITY PARK BUILDING 600 3RD AVE S / 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 271.76 Total : 7,037.86 229647 2/1/2018 070809 PUGET SOUND EXECUTIVE 18-0083 COURT SECURITY 01/16/2018-01/17/2018 COURT SECURITY 01/16/2018-01/17/2018 001.000.23.512.50.41.00 687.50 PROBATION SECURITY 01/17/2018 001.000.23.523.30.41.00 55.00 Total : 742.50 229648 2/1/2018 066590 ROBERT W FELIX LLC 6147 HYPNOSIS 6147 HYPNOSIS FOR WEIGHT LOSS INSTRUCTIO 6147 HYPNOSIS FOR WEIGHT LOSS 001.000.64.571.22.41.00 174.00 Total : 174.00 229649 2/1/2018 064769 ROMAINE ELECTRIC 5-016868 UNIT 902 - BATTERYS Unit 902 - Batterys 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 283.38 10.3% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 29.19 Total : 312.57 229650 2/1/2018 072725 SAGACITY CUSTOM PUBLISHING 2018-15941-1 LTAC TOURISM PROMO AD IN WASHINGTON STAT LTAC Tourism Promotion ad in Washington 120.000.31.575.42.41.40 1,245.00 Total : 1,245.00 229651 2/1/2018 074431 SEATTLE ASBESTOS TEST LLC 201809167 LEAD TESTING AT CIVIC LEAD TESTING AT CIVIC 125.000.64.594.75.65.00 650.00 Total : 650.00 229652 2/1/2018 067076 SEATTLE PUMP AND EQUIPMENT CO 18-0360 UNIT 106 - PARTS Unit 106 - Parts 17Page: 4.3.a Packet Pg. 30 Attachment: 02-01-18 Voucher Listing (Approval of claim checks.) 01/31/2018 Voucher List City of Edmonds 18 2:17:41PM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 229652 2/1/2018 (Continued)067076 SEATTLE PUMP AND EQUIPMENT CO 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 599.61 10.3% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 61.76 Total : 661.37 229653 2/1/2018 066918 SEDOR, NORMAN 11 REIMBURSEMENT Reimbursement 009.000.39.517.20.29.00 10,917.00 Total : 10,917.00 229654 2/1/2018 070495 SEPULVEDA, PABLO 25184 SPANISH INTERPRETER COURT 01/24/2018 SPANISH INTERPRETER COURT 01/24/2018 001.000.23.512.50.41.01 105.02 Total : 105.02 229655 2/1/2018 068489 SIRENNET.COM 0223767-IN UNIT 438- SUPPLIES Unit 438- Supplies 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 431.97 Freight 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 25.02 10.3% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 47.07 Total : 504.06 229656 2/1/2018 036955 SKY NURSERY T-1059041 FLOWER PROGRAM: PLANTS FOR FERRY GATEWAY FLOWER PROGRAM: PLANTS FOR FERRY GATEWAY 001.000.64.576.81.31.00 193.92 10.0% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.81.31.00 19.39 Total : 213.31 229657 2/1/2018 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 2003-8645-6 CLUBHOUSE 6801 MEADOWDALE RD / METER 100 CLUBHOUSE 6801 MEADOWDALE RD / METER 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 70.44 LIFT STATION #4 8311 TALBOT RD / METER 12004-6859-3 18Page: 4.3.a Packet Pg. 31 Attachment: 02-01-18 Voucher Listing (Approval of claim checks.) 01/31/2018 Voucher List City of Edmonds 19 2:17:41PM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 229657 2/1/2018 (Continued)037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 LIFT STATION #4 8311 TALBOT RD / METER 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 346.21 OLD PUBLIC WORKS 200 DAYTON ST / METER 12006-3860-9 OLD PUBLIC WORKS 200 DAYTON ST / METER 421.000.74.534.80.47.00 403.12 TRAFFIC LIGHT 9730 220TH ST SW / METER 12007-4860-6 TRAFFIC LIGHT 9730 220TH ST SW / METER 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 18.32 TRAFFIC LIGHT 23202 EDMONDS WAY / METER2009-4334-8 TRAFFIC LIGHT 23202 EDMONDS WAY / METER 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 54.42 FISHING PIER RESTROOMS2012-3682-5 FISHING PIER RESTROOMS 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 275.38 LIFT STATION #12 16121 75TH PL W / METE2012-6598-0 LIFT STATION #12 16121 75TH PL W / 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 224.52 LIFT STATION #11 6811 1/2 157TH PL W / M2013-7496-4 LIFT STATION #11 6811 1/2 157TH PL W / 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 24.73 TRAFFIC LIGHT 117 3RD AVE S / METER 10002015-7289-8 TRAFFIC LIGHT 117 3RD AVE S / METER 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 51.83 TRAFFIC LIGHT 19600 80TH AVE W / METER 12015-8215-2 TRAFFIC LIGHT 19600 80TH AVE W / METER 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 27.50 LIFT STATION #15 7710 168TH PL SW / METE2015-9448-8 LIFT STATION #15 7710 168TH PL SW / 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 21.08 TRAFFIC LIGHT 20801 76TH AVE W / METER 12016-1195-1 TRAFFIC LIGHT 20801 76TH AVE W / METER 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 35.15 TRAFFIC LIGHT 901 WALNUT ST / METER 10002017-8264-6 TRAFFIC LIGHT 901 WALNUT ST / METER 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 18.89 19Page: 4.3.a Packet Pg. 32 Attachment: 02-01-18 Voucher Listing (Approval of claim checks.) 01/31/2018 Voucher List City of Edmonds 20 2:17:41PM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 229657 2/1/2018 (Continued)037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 TRAFFIC LIGHT 7133 212TH ST SW / METER 12019-0786-2 TRAFFIC LIGHT 7133 212TH ST SW / METER 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 30.26 LIFT STATION #6 100 PINE ST / METER 10002020-8787-0 LIFT STATION #6 100 PINE ST / METER 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 181.57 TRAFFIC LIGHT 23801 HWY 99 / METER 100042022-8912-0 TRAFFIC LIGHT 23801 HWY 99 / METER 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 56.61 MATHAY BALLINGER PARK IRRIGATION & SUMP2026-2041-5 MATHAY BALLINGER PARK IRRIGATION & SUMP 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 17.17 WWTP: 12/16/17-1/16/18 METER 1000135381:2030-9778-7 12/16/17-1/16/18 200 2ND AVE S / METER 423.000.76.535.80.47.61 25,836.93 TRAFFIC LIGHT SR104 @ 95TH AVE W /2205-4758-2 TRAFFIC LIGHT SR104 @ 95TH AVE W / 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 38.62 Total : 27,732.75 229658 2/1/2018 063941 SNO CO SHERIFFS OFFICE I000463195 INV#I000463195 CUST#SSH00095-EDMONDS PD SCSO RANGE USAGE 9 HR 12/5/17 001.000.41.521.40.41.00 522.00 SCSO RANGE USAGE 10 HR 12/11/17 001.000.41.521.40.41.00 580.00 SCSO RANGE USAGE 10 HR 12/13/17 001.000.41.521.40.41.00 580.00 SCSO RANGE USAGE 9 HR 12/14/17 001.000.41.521.40.41.00 522.00 Total : 2,204.00 229659 2/1/2018 063941 SNO CO SHERIFFS OFFICE 2017-4332 INV 2017-4332 DEC 2017 INMATE MEDS - EDM DEC 2017 INMATE MEDS 001.000.39.523.60.31.00 40.73 20Page: 4.3.a Packet Pg. 33 Attachment: 02-01-18 Voucher Listing (Approval of claim checks.) 01/31/2018 Voucher List City of Edmonds 21 2:17:41PM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total : 40.73 229659 2/1/2018 063941 063941 SNO CO SHERIFFS OFFICE 229660 2/1/2018 076460 STOEHR, JUDY 1/26 REFUND 1/26 REFUND CLASS CANCELLATION 1/26 REFUND CLASS CANCELLATION 001.000.239.200 12.13 Total : 12.13 229661 2/1/2018 068360 SUMMIT LAW GROUP 89663 NEGOTIATIONS 2017 NEGOTIATIONS 001.000.64.571.21.41.00 558.54 2017 NEGOTIATIONS 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 636.12 2017 NEGOTIATIONS 423.000.75.535.80.41.00 636.12 2017 NEGOTIATIONS 422.000.72.531.90.41.00 636.12 2017 NEGOTIATIONS 111.000.68.542.31.41.00 636.10 Total : 3,103.00 229662 2/1/2018 040917 TACOMA SCREW PRODUCTS INC 18186151 TRAFFIC - SUPPLIES Traffic - Supplies 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 98.90 10.3% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 10.19 FLEET SHOP SUPPLIES18187028 Fleet Shop Supplies 511.000.77.548.68.31.20 135.96 10.3% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.20 14.00 STORM - SUPPLIES18187029 Storm - Supplies 422.000.72.531.40.31.00 90.64 10.3% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.40.31.00 9.34 TRAFFIC - SUPPLIES18187030 21Page: 4.3.a Packet Pg. 34 Attachment: 02-01-18 Voucher Listing (Approval of claim checks.) 01/31/2018 Voucher List City of Edmonds 22 2:17:41PM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 229662 2/1/2018 (Continued)040917 TACOMA SCREW PRODUCTS INC Traffic - Supplies 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 47.47 10.3% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 4.89 TRAFFIC - SUPPLIES18187031 Traffic - Supplies 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 79.90 10.3% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 8.23 WATER - PIPE EXTRACTORS18187032 Water - Pipe Extractors 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 247.37 10.3% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 25.48 Total : 772.37 229663 2/1/2018 013007 THE ESTATE OF EZRA J HASNER 8 REIMBURSEMENT Reimbursement 009.000.39.517.20.23.00 658.00 Total : 658.00 229664 2/1/2018 072649 THE WIDE FORMAT COMPANY 105247 MAINTENANCE FOR HP PAGEWIDE LX4000 Jan-18 Maintenance on HP Pagewide 512.000.31.518.88.48.00 175.00 10.3% Sales Tax 512.000.31.518.88.48.00 18.03 Total : 193.03 229665 2/1/2018 068724 US HEALTHWORKS MED GROUP OF WA 0762736-WA DOT PHYSICAL DOT Physical - Storm 422.000.72.531.90.41.00 99.00 Total : 99.00 229666 2/1/2018 064423 USA BLUE BOOK 466822 SEWER - ROOT CONTROL Sewer - Root Control 22Page: 4.3.a Packet Pg. 35 Attachment: 02-01-18 Voucher Listing (Approval of claim checks.) 01/31/2018 Voucher List City of Edmonds 23 2:17:41PM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 229666 2/1/2018 (Continued)064423 USA BLUE BOOK 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 953.88 Freight 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 91.70 10.3% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 107.69 Total : 1,153.27 229667 2/1/2018 067086 WASHINGTON CRANE AND HOIST CO 0035111-IN WWTP: HOIST & TROLLEY SERVICE HOIST & TROLLEY SERVICE 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 840.00 10.3% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 86.52 Total : 926.52 229668 2/1/2018 075635 WCP SOLUTIONS 10481239 PM: SUPPLIES PM: SUPPLIES 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 54.55 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 5.62 Total : 60.17 229669 2/1/2018 047960 WEAN, GREG 12 REIMBURSEMENT Reimbursement 009.000.39.517.20.23.00 1,869.71 Total : 1,869.71 229670 2/1/2018 073552 WELCO SALES LLC 7419 INV#7419 - EDMONDS PD 2,000 DOMESTIC CRISIS BROCHURES 001.000.41.521.11.31.00 480.00 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.11.31.00 49.44 Total : 529.44 229671 2/1/2018 064008 WETLANDS & WOODLANDS 22770 PM: GRAND FIRS PM: GRAND FIRS 23Page: 4.3.a Packet Pg. 36 Attachment: 02-01-18 Voucher Listing (Approval of claim checks.) 01/31/2018 Voucher List City of Edmonds 24 2:17:41PM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 229671 2/1/2018 (Continued)064008 WETLANDS & WOODLANDS 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 475.00 7.7% sales tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 36.58 PM: PLANTS FOR FERRY GATEWAY22795 PM: PLANTS FOR FERRY GATEWAY 001.000.64.576.81.31.00 154.50 7.7% sales tax 001.000.64.576.81.31.00 11.90 Total : 677.98 229672 2/1/2018 072634 WHISTLE WORKWEAR TR-390568 PM: BOOTS PM: BOOTS 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 116.99 9.7% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 11.35 Total : 128.34 229673 2/1/2018 071104 WIPPEL, TERESA 18012501 P&R: 2018 MONTHLY ADVERTISING P&R: 2018 MONTHLY ADVERTISING 001.000.64.571.22.41.40 2,400.00 Total : 2,400.00 229674 2/1/2018 066678 WSDA PESTICIDE MGMT DIVISION SIENKO EXAM AND LIC SIENKO EXAM AND LIC SIENKO EXAM AND LIC 001.000.64.576.80.49.00 58.00 Total : 58.00 229675 2/1/2018 051050 WYATT, ARTHUR D 9 REIMBURSEMENT Reimbursement 009.000.39.517.20.23.00 1,308.00 Total : 1,308.00 Bank total : 158,053.88 81 Vouchers for bank code :usbank 158,053.88Total vouchers :Vouchers in this report 81 24Page: 4.3.a Packet Pg. 37 Attachment: 02-01-18 Voucher Listing (Approval of claim checks.) 01/31/2018 Voucher List City of Edmonds 25 2:17:41PM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 25Page: 4.3.a Packet Pg. 38 Attachment: 02-01-18 Voucher Listing (Approval of claim checks.) 01/19/2018Voucher ListCity of Edmonds1 2:27:28PMPage:vchlistBank code :usbankVoucherDateVendorInvoicePO #Description/AccountAmount229463 1/19/2018070322 A&A LANGUAGE SERVICES INC 15-54195FARSI INTERPRETER COURT 10/27/2017FARSI INTERPRETER COURT 10/27/2017001.000.23.512.50.41.01 159.26Total :159.26229464 1/19/2018072005 BROCKMANN, KERRY 5944 5947 5953 YOGA5944 5947 5953 YOGA INSTRUCTION5944 YOGA INSTRUCTION001.000.64.571.27.41.00 290.705947 YOGA INSTRUCTION001.000.64.571.27.41.00 290.705953 YOGA INSTRUCTION001.000.64.571.27.41.00 254.25Total :835.65229465 1/19/2018076240 CADMAN MATERIALS INC 1603474CEMETERY PROJECTCEMETERY PROJECT130.000.64.536.50.31.00 355.5010.3% Sales Tax130.000.64.536.50.31.00 36.62Total :392.12229466 1/19/2018 060165 HWA GEOSCIENCES INC 27971VERT EXC ASSESS 2017-007-21Vert Exc Assess 2017-00-21001.000.62.524.20.41.00 1,150.00Total :1,150.00229467 1/19/2018070250 IRON MOUNTAIN 20150573312-17 OFF SITE DATA STORAGE SERVICESDec-2017 Off site data storage services512.000.31.518.88.41.00 159.58Total :159.58229468 1/19/2018067330 KAR-VEL CONSTRUCTION INC E5FE.Pmt 5E5FE.PMT 5 THRU 9/30/17E5FE.Pmt 5 thru 9/30/17422.200.72.594.31.65.00 183,063.99E5FE.Ret 51Page:4.3.bPacket Pg. 39Attachment: claim cks 01-19-18 (Approval of claim checks.) 01/19/2018Voucher ListCity of Edmonds2 2:27:28PMPage:vchlistBank code :usbankVoucherDateVendorInvoicePO #Description/AccountAmount229468 1/19/2018(Continued)067330 KAR-VEL CONSTRUCTION INC422.200.223.400 -8,298.46Total :174,765.53229469 1/19/2018027450 PAWSPAWS 12/2017ANIMAL SHELTERING - DEC 2017 - EDMONDS PBOARD 7 ANIMALS @ $175 - 12/17001.000.41.521.70.41.00 1,225.00INVOICE 1/8/18 FOR DEC 2017 - CREDITSPAWS 12/2017RECLAIM FEES FOR 2 DOGS @ $20001.000.41.521.70.41.00 -40.00BOARDING FEES FOR 4 DAYS @ $15001.000.41.521.70.41.00 -60.00Total :1,125.00229470 1/19/2018062693 US BANK 8349.17INV#8349 01/08/18 - ANDERSON - EDMONDS PPARKING TASK FORCE MTG-ANDERSON001.000.41.521.10.43.00 3.00Total :3.00Bank total : 178,590.148 Vouchers for bank code :usbank178,590.14Total vouchers :Vouchers in this report82Page:4.3.bPacket Pg. 40Attachment: claim cks 01-19-18 (Approval of claim checks.) 01/25/2018 Voucher List City of Edmonds 1 8:10:09AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 229471 1/25/2018 076040 911 SUPPLY INC IN-11219 INV#IN-11219 - EDMONDS PD - GIAMMALVA 5.11 TACLITE TDU PANTS 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 64.99 10.0% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 6.50 Total : 71.49 229472 1/25/2018 076010 AEROSPACE FUTURES ALLIANCE 833 AEROSPACE FUTURES ALLIANCE 2018 MEMBERSH Aerospace Futures Alliance 2018 001.000.61.558.70.49.00 1,000.00 Total : 1,000.00 229473 1/25/2018 076438 ALBRECHT, MARION 1/12 REFUND 1/12 REFUND CLASS CANCELLATION 1/12 REFUND CLASS CANCELLATION 001.000.239.200 10.50 Total : 10.50 229474 1/25/2018 074546 ALL POINTS HEATING & FIREPLACE BLD20171820 REFUND: APPLICANT MARKED GAS PIPING Refund: Applicant marked gas piping 001.000.257.620 4.00 REFUND: APPLICANT NOT INSTALLING GASBLD20180046 Refund: Applicant not installing gas 001.000.257.620 4.00 Total : 8.00 229475 1/25/2018 071634 ALLSTREAM 768328 C/A 768328 PR1-1 & 2 City Phone Service 512.000.31.518.88.42.00 954.99 Tourism Toll free lines 877.775.6929; 001.000.61.558.70.42.00 8.72 Econ Devlpmnt Toll free lines 001.000.61.558.70.42.00 8.72 Total : 972.43 229476 1/25/2018 063862 ALPINE PRODUCTS INC TM-173215 WATER - FIRE HYDRANT MAINT - BLUE 1Page: 4.3.c Packet Pg. 41 Attachment: claim cks 01-25-18 (Approval of claim checks.) 01/25/2018 Voucher List City of Edmonds 2 8:10:09AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 229476 1/25/2018 (Continued)063862 ALPINE PRODUCTS INC Water - Fire Hydrant Maint - Blue 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 300.00 Freight 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 39.53 10.3% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 34.97 Total : 374.50 229477 1/25/2018 073573 ANIXTER 605 489950 TRAFFIC CONTROL WIRE Traffic Control Wire 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 483.59 10.0% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 48.36 Total : 531.95 229478 1/25/2018 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 1990506156 FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS & MATS FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS 511.000.77.548.68.24.00 32.57 10.3% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.24.00 3.35 FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS1990516620 FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS 001.000.66.518.30.24.00 32.57 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.24.00 3.35 PARKS MAINT UNIFORM SERVICE1990527023 PARKS MAINT UNIFORM SERVICE 001.000.64.576.80.24.00 52.27 FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS1990527024 FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS 001.000.66.518.30.24.00 32.57 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.24.00 3.35 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS1990530879 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS 2Page: 4.3.c Packet Pg. 42 Attachment: claim cks 01-25-18 (Approval of claim checks.) 01/25/2018 Voucher List City of Edmonds 3 8:10:09AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 229478 1/25/2018 (Continued)069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 001.000.65.518.20.41.00 2.31 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS 111.000.68.542.90.41.00 8.77 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 8.77 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS 422.000.72.531.90.41.00 8.77 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS 423.000.75.535.80.41.00 8.77 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 8.74 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.65.518.20.41.00 0.24 10.3% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.90.41.00 0.90 10.3% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 0.90 10.3% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.41.00 0.90 10.3% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.41.00 0.90 10.3% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 0.91 FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS & MATS1990530880 FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS 511.000.77.548.68.24.00 5.68 FLEET DIVISION MATS 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 18.40 10.3% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.24.00 1.30 10.3% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 1.18 WWTP: 1/17/18 MATS,TOWELS,UNIFORMS1990537430 Mats & Towels 3Page: 4.3.c Packet Pg. 43 Attachment: claim cks 01-25-18 (Approval of claim checks.) 01/25/2018 Voucher List City of Edmonds 4 8:10:09AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 229478 1/25/2018 (Continued)069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 115.98 Uniforms 423.000.76.535.80.24.00 5.10 10.3% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 11.95 10.3% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.24.00 0.52 PARKS MAINT UNIFORM SERVICE1990537431 PARKS MAINT UNIFORM SERVICE 001.000.64.576.80.24.00 52.27 FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS1990537432 FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS 001.000.66.518.30.24.00 32.57 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.24.00 3.35 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS1990541319 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS 001.000.65.518.20.41.00 1.61 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS 111.000.68.542.90.41.00 6.11 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 6.11 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS 422.000.72.531.90.41.00 6.11 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS 423.000.75.535.80.41.00 6.11 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 6.08 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.65.518.20.41.00 0.17 10.3% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.90.41.00 0.63 10.3% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 0.63 4Page: 4.3.c Packet Pg. 44 Attachment: claim cks 01-25-18 (Approval of claim checks.) 01/25/2018 Voucher List City of Edmonds 5 8:10:09AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 229478 1/25/2018 (Continued)069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 10.3% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.41.00 0.63 10.3% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.41.00 0.63 10.3% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 0.62 FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS & MATS1990541320 FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS 511.000.77.548.68.24.00 5.68 FLEET DIVISION MATS 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 18.40 10.3% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.24.00 1.30 10.3% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 1.18 Total : 521.21 229479 1/25/2018 071124 ASSOCIATED PETROLEUM 1192207-IN WWTP: DIESEL FUEL DIESEL FUEL - ULSD #2 DYED - BULK fuel 423.000.76.535.80.32.00 1,689.64 10.3% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.32.00 174.04 Total : 1,863.68 229480 1/25/2018 002100 BARNARD, EARL 6 REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT 617.000.51.517.20.23.00 1,295.31 Total : 1,295.31 229481 1/25/2018 073062 BLUE FLAME BLD20180009 REFUND: CUSTOMER CANCELLED INSTALLATION Refund: Customer cancelled installation 001.000.257.620 60.00 Total : 60.00 229482 1/25/2018 074307 BLUE STAR GAS 9241 FLEET AUTO PROPANE 507.8 GAL 5Page: 4.3.c Packet Pg. 45 Attachment: claim cks 01-25-18 (Approval of claim checks.) 01/25/2018 Voucher List City of Edmonds 6 8:10:09AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 229482 1/25/2018 (Continued)074307 BLUE STAR GAS Fleet Auto Propane 507.8 Gal 511.000.77.548.68.34.12 667.62 FLEET AUTO PROPANE 520.4 GAL9275 Fleet Auto Propane 520.4 Gal 511.000.77.548.68.34.12 676.17 FLEET AUTO PROPANE 581.5 GAL9311 Fleet Auto Propane 581.5 Gal 511.000.77.548.68.34.12 752.24 FLEET AUTO PROPANE 601.9 GAL9347 Fleet Auto Propane 601.9 Gal 511.000.77.548.68.34.12 771.71 Total : 2,867.74 229483 1/25/2018 073250 BMI GENERAL LICENSING 31047784 2018 MUSIC LICENSE 2018 MUSIC LICENSE 001.000.64.571.22.49.00 349.00 Total : 349.00 229484 1/25/2018 003075 BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY E5AA.BNSF Dayton E5AA.DAYTON CONTRACT PAYMENT E5AA.Dayton Contract Payment 112.000.68.595.33.65.41 4,206.00 E5AA.MAIN CONTRACT PAYMENTE5AA.BNSF Main E5AA.Main Contract Payment 112.000.68.595.33.65.41 12,393.00 Total : 16,599.00 229485 1/25/2018 075874 BULGER SAFE & LOCK 36994 SR CENTER - LOCK SUPPLIES Sr Center - Lock Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 150.00 10.1 % Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 15.15 Total : 165.15 229486 1/25/2018 076451 BYUNG & YOUNG PARK 2-16130 #40190399-807-CR4 UTILITY REFUND #40190399-807-CR4 Utility refund - 6Page: 4.3.c Packet Pg. 46 Attachment: claim cks 01-25-18 (Approval of claim checks.) 01/25/2018 Voucher List City of Edmonds 7 8:10:09AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 229486 1/25/2018 (Continued)076451 BYUNG & YOUNG PARK 411.000.233.000 201.35 Total : 201.35 229487 1/25/2018 076453 CAMPBELL, KYLEIGH 1/18 REFUND 1/18 REFUND ACTIVITY CANCELLATION 1/18 REFUND ACTIVITY CANCELLATION 001.000.239.200 12.00 Total : 12.00 229488 1/25/2018 073029 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES 18203148 COPY MACHINE RENTAL COURT COPY MACHINE RENTAL COURT 001.000.23.512.50.45.00 59.52 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.23.512.50.45.00 6.13 C/A 572105 CONTRACT# 3091/0521418203149 Finance dept copier contract charge 001.000.31.514.23.45.00 209.61 B&W Meter usage IRC5250 12/1/17 - 001.000.31.514.23.45.00 12.84 Color Meter usage IRC5250 12/1/17 - 001.000.31.514.23.45.00 54.40 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.31.514.23.45.00 28.50 CITY CLERKS COPIER LEASE 01/01/2018 - 0118203150 CITY CLERKS COPIER LEASE 01/01/2018 - 001.000.25.514.30.45.00 572.04 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.25.514.30.45.00 58.92 PARKS & REC C5250 COPIER CONTRACT 001-0518203151 PARKS & REC C5250 COPIER CONTRACT 001.000.64.571.21.45.00 330.05 CANON 525018203152 contract charge 1/18 001.000.22.518.10.45.00 167.69 contract charge 1/18 001.000.61.557.20.45.00 20.96 7Page: 4.3.c Packet Pg. 47 Attachment: claim cks 01-25-18 (Approval of claim checks.) 01/25/2018 Voucher List City of Edmonds 8 8:10:09AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 229488 1/25/2018 (Continued)073029 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES contract charge 1/18 001.000.21.513.10.45.00 20.96 BW meter usage 12/17 001.000.22.518.10.45.00 19.26 BW meter usage 12/17 001.000.61.557.20.45.00 2.41 BW meter usage 12/17 001.000.21.513.10.45.00 2.40 CLR meter usage 12/17 001.000.22.518.10.45.00 75.72 CLR meter usage 12/17 001.000.61.557.20.45.00 9.47 CLR meter usage 12/17 001.000.21.513.10.45.00 9.46 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.22.518.10.45.00 27.06 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.61.557.20.45.00 3.38 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.21.513.10.45.00 3.38 WWTP: 1/1-1/31/18 MO CHG+12/1-12/31/17 M18203153 1/1-1/31/18 MO CHG+12/1-12/31/17 METER 423.000.76.535.80.45.00 158.90 CANON 250IF18203154 contract charge 1/18 001.000.21.513.10.45.00 26.44 B/W meter usage 12/17 001.000.21.513.10.45.00 1.86 CLR meter usage 12/17 001.000.21.513.10.45.00 17.89 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.21.513.10.45.00 4.76 COPIER/PRINTER CONTRACT BLD DIV-DSD18203155 Copier/Printer Contract Bld Div-DSD 8Page: 4.3.c Packet Pg. 48 Attachment: claim cks 01-25-18 (Approval of claim checks.) 01/25/2018 Voucher List City of Edmonds 9 8:10:09AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 229488 1/25/2018 (Continued)073029 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES 001.000.62.524.10.45.00 39.22 COPIER/PRINTER CONTRACT PLANNING DIV18203156 Copier/Printer Contract Planning Div 001.000.62.524.10.45.00 38.79 P&R PRINTER IRC250IF CONTRACT 001-05721018203157 P&R PRINTER IRC250IF CONTRACT 001.000.64.571.21.45.00 93.18 PARKS IRC250IF COPIER CONTRACT 001-0572118203158 PARKS IRC250IF COPIER CONTRACT 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 57.89 FLEET COPIER18203159 Fleet Copier 511.000.77.548.68.45.00 39.28 10.3% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.45.00 4.04 RECEPTIONIST DESK CITY CLERKS COPIER LEA18203160 RECEPTIONIST DESK CITY CLERKS COPIER 001.000.25.514.30.45.00 36.10 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.25.514.30.45.00 3.72 CONTRACT CHARGE FOR COPIER IRC2501F18203161 Contract charge 1/1/2018 - 1/31/2018 001.000.11.511.60.45.00 26.44 Black/white meter usage 001.000.11.511.60.45.00 2.26 Color Meter usage 001.000.11.511.60.45.00 8.10 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.11.511.60.45.00 3.81 INV#18203162 - EDMONDS PD18203162 IRC5550 COPIER RENT 01/01-01/31/18 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 185.74 B/W METER USE 12/01-12/31/17 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 33.50 9Page: 4.3.c Packet Pg. 49 Attachment: claim cks 01-25-18 (Approval of claim checks.) 01/25/2018 Voucher List City of Edmonds 10 8:10:09AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 229488 1/25/2018 (Continued)073029 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES COLOR METER USE 12/01-12/31/17 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 240.15 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 47.31 WATER SEWER COPIER18203163 Water Sewer Copier 421.000.74.534.80.45.00 76.51 Water Sewer Copier 423.000.75.535.80.45.00 76.51 10.3% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.45.00 7.88 10.3% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.45.00 7.88 PW ADMIN COPIER18203164 PW Office Copier for 001.000.65.518.20.45.00 102.13 PW Office Copier for 111.000.68.542.90.45.00 57.88 PW Office Copier for 422.000.72.531.90.45.00 57.88 PW Office Copier for 421.000.74.534.80.45.00 40.85 PW Office Copier for 423.000.75.535.80.45.00 40.85 PW Office Copier for 511.000.77.548.68.45.00 40.85 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.65.518.20.45.00 10.52 10.3% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.90.45.00 5.96 10.3% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.45.00 5.96 10.3% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.45.00 4.21 10Page: 4.3.c Packet Pg. 50 Attachment: claim cks 01-25-18 (Approval of claim checks.) 01/25/2018 Voucher List City of Edmonds 11 8:10:09AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 229488 1/25/2018 (Continued)073029 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES 10.3% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.45.00 4.21 10.3% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.45.00 4.21 CONTRACT CHARGE JAN. 1 - 31, 2018 ~18206920 Contract Charge Jan. 1 - 31, 2018 ~ 001.000.62.524.10.45.00 671.77 Total : 3,979.60 229489 1/25/2018 075023 CAROLYN DOUGLAS COMMUNICATIONS 74 COMMUNICATIONS CONSULTANT AND OUTREACH J Consulting: Communications and 001.000.61.557.20.41.00 2,500.00 Total : 2,500.00 229490 1/25/2018 075849 CARTER, JEANNE JANUARY 2018 DIVERSITY ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES FOR JA Diversity commission administrative 001.000.61.557.20.41.00 500.00 Total : 500.00 229491 1/25/2018 019215 CITY OF LYNNWOOD 13815 WWTP: JAN 2018 M/O+SEWER JAN 2018 M/O+SEWER 423.000.75.535.80.47.20 27,602.00 Total : 27,602.00 229492 1/25/2018 073617 CLIFTON, AMBER 01182018 MILEAGE FOR LASERFICHE TRAINING TUKWILA MILEAGE FOR LASERFICHE TRAINING TUKWILA 001.000.23.512.50.43.00 30.85 Total : 30.85 229493 1/25/2018 076321 CM HEATING INC BLD20171760 REFUND: APPLICANT SAYS OWNER HAS Refund: Applicant says owner has 001.000.257.620 48.00 REFUND: APPLICANT SAYS OWNER HASBLD20180003 Refund: Applicant says owner has 001.000.257.620 48.00 11Page: 4.3.c Packet Pg. 51 Attachment: claim cks 01-25-18 (Approval of claim checks.) 01/25/2018 Voucher List City of Edmonds 12 8:10:09AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total : 96.00 229493 1/25/2018 076321 076321 CM HEATING INC 229494 1/25/2018 062975 COLLISION CLINIC INC 36833 UNIT 285 - REPAIRS Unit 285 - Repairs 511.000.77.548.68.48.00 2,423.26 10.3% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.48.00 249.60 Total : 2,672.86 229495 1/25/2018 068161 COSCO FIRE PROTECTION INC 1000383655 PS - FIRE ALARM SERVICE AND REPAIRS PS - Fire Alarm Service and Repairs 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 569.00 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 58.61 Total : 627.61 229496 1/25/2018 075042 COVERALL OF WASHINGTON 7100175933 WWTP: JAN 2018 JANITORIAL SERVICE JAN 2018 JANITORIAL SERVICE 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 514.00 Total : 514.00 229497 1/25/2018 075648 COVICH-WILLIAMS CO INC 0301534-IN UNIT 9 & 21 - SUPPLIES Unit 9 & 21 - Supplies 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 62.26 10.3% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 6.42 Total : 68.68 229498 1/25/2018 076439 DAVIS, DIANE 1/12 REFUND 1/12 REFUND ACTIVITY CANCELLATION 1/12 REFUND ACTIVITY CANCELLATION 001.000.239.200 10.50 Total : 10.50 229499 1/25/2018 076381 DEAN, DANIEL BLD20171770 REFUND: APPLICANT DECIDED NOT TO DO Refund: Applicant decided not to do 001.000.257.620 344.00 12Page: 4.3.c Packet Pg. 52 Attachment: claim cks 01-25-18 (Approval of claim checks.) 01/25/2018 Voucher List City of Edmonds 13 8:10:09AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total : 344.00 229499 1/25/2018 076381 076381 DEAN, DANIEL 229500 1/25/2018 046150 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY 222212 FAC ELEVATOR CERT RENEWAL 2018 FAC Elevator Cert Renewal 2018 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 141.60 Library Elevator Cert Renewal 2018 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 129.00 Museum Elevator Cert Renewal 2018 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 129.00 CITY HALL ELEVATOR CERT RENEWAL 2018222214 City Hall Elevator Cert Renewal 2018 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 154.20 PW ELEVATOR CERT RENEWAL 2018222215 PW Elevator Cert Renewal 2018 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 129.00 Total : 682.80 229501 1/25/2018 064531 DINES, JEANNIE 18-3822 01/16/2018 CITY COUNCIL MEETING 01/16/2018 CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 001.000.25.514.30.41.00 394.40 Total : 394.40 229502 1/25/2018 076440 DOW, BARBARA 1/12 REFUND 1/12 REFUND ACTIVITY CANCELLATION 1/12 REFUND ACTIVITY CANCELLATION 001.000.239.200 13.00 Total : 13.00 229503 1/25/2018 007253 DUNN LUMBER 5265043 PM: CONCRETE MIX PM: CONCRETE MIX 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 15.72 10.0% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 1.57 PM: STRAP HINGE, PLYWOOD5270766 PM: STRAP HINGE, PLYWOOD 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 97.72 10.0% Sales Tax 13Page: 4.3.c Packet Pg. 53 Attachment: claim cks 01-25-18 (Approval of claim checks.) 01/25/2018 Voucher List City of Edmonds 14 8:10:09AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 229503 1/25/2018 (Continued)007253 DUNN LUMBER 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 9.77 Total : 124.78 229504 1/25/2018 007287 ECONOMIC ALLIANCE SNOHOMISH CO 2018-111 2018 EASC MEMBERSHIP DUES 2018 Economic Alliance Snohomish County 001.000.39.513.10.49.00 10,000.00 Total : 10,000.00 229505 1/25/2018 007905 EDMONDS FAMILY MEDICINE CLINIC E1943750 PRE-EMPLOYMENT TESTING PRE-EMPLOYMENT TESTING 001.000.22.521.10.41.00 76.00 PRE-EMPLOYMENT TESTINGE1946021 PRE-EMPLOYMENT TESTING 001.000.22.521.10.41.00 239.00 Total : 315.00 229506 1/25/2018 074302 EDMONDS HARDWARE & PAINT LLC 002624 PM: BULK FASTENERS, DRILL BIT, PADLOCK PM: BULK FASTENERS, DRILL BIT, PADLOCK 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 49.49 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 5.10 PM: DROPCLOTH, SCREWS, WASHERS, TAPE,002628 PM: DROPCLOTH, SCREWS, WASHERS, TAPE, 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 143.73 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 14.80 Total : 213.12 229508 1/25/2018 008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION 6-00025 MARINA BEACH PARK SPRINKLER MARINA BEACH PARK 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 191.45 FISHING PIER & RESTROOMS6-00200 FISHING PIER & RESTROOMS 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 810.55 BRACKETT'S LANDING SOUTH SPRINKLER6-00410 14Page: 4.3.c Packet Pg. 54 Attachment: claim cks 01-25-18 (Approval of claim checks.) 01/25/2018 Voucher List City of Edmonds 15 8:10:09AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 229508 1/25/2018 (Continued)008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION BRACKETT'S LANDING SOUTH SPRINKLER 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 363.48 ANWAY PARK RESTROOMS6-00475 ANWAY PARK RESTROOMS 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 1,019.02 WWTP:11/15/17-1/15/18 200 2ND AVE S METE6-01127 11/15/17-1/15/18: 200 2ND AVE S/METER 423.000.76.535.80.47.64 179.15 WWTP: 11/15/17-1/15/18 200 2ND AVE S MET6-01130 11/15/17-1/15/18: 200 2ND AVE S/METER 423.000.76.535.80.47.64 24.94 WWTP: 11/16/17-1/15/18: 200 2ND AVE S ME6-01140 1/16/17-1/15/18: 200 2ND AVE S METER 423.000.76.535.80.47.64 2,164.52 CITY PARK BALLFIELD SPRINKLER6-01250 CITY PARK BALLFIELD SPRINKLER 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 195.55 CITY PARK PARKING LOT6-01275 CITY PARK PARKING LOT 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 1,240.88 CITY PARK SPRAY PARK6-01280 CITY PARK SPRAY PARK 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 278.11 PINE STREET PLAYFIELD SPRINKLER6-02125 PINE STREET PLAYFIELD SPRINKLER 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 307.48 BOYS & GIRLS CLUB SPRINKLER6-02727 BOYS & GIRLS CLUB SPRINKLER 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 273.13 CIVIC CENTER PLAYFIELD SKATE PARK SPRINK6-02730 CIVIC CENTER PLAYFIELD SKATE PARK 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 273.13 PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX 250 5TH AVE N / ME6-02735 PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX 250 5TH AVE N / 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 2,144.58 15Page: 4.3.c Packet Pg. 55 Attachment: claim cks 01-25-18 (Approval of claim checks.) 01/25/2018 Voucher List City of Edmonds 16 8:10:09AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 229508 1/25/2018 (Continued)008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION FIRE STATION #17 FIRE 275 6TH AVE N / ME6-02736 FIRE STATION #17 FIRE 275 6TH AVE N / 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 14.25 FIRE STATION #17 275 6TH AVE N / METER 76-02737 FIRE STATION #17 275 6TH AVE N / METER 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 1,057.57 PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX IRRIGATION 250 5TH6-02738 PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX IRRIGATION 250 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 277.24 VETERANS PLAZA6-02745 VETERANS PLAZA 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 63.99 SNO-ISLE LIBRARY 650 MAIN ST / METER 7096-02825 SNO-ISLE LIBRARY 650 MAIN ST / METER 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 2,544.58 FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER FIRE 700 MAIN ST6-02875 FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER FIRE 700 MAIN 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 24.94 DOWNTOWN RESTROOM6-02885 DOWNTOWN RESTROOM 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 363.81 FAC SPRINKLER6-02900 FAC SPRINKLER 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 273.13 FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER 700 MAIN ST / ME6-02925 FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER 700 MAIN ST / 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 1,890.00 CIVIC CENTER PARKING LOT SPRINKLER6-03000 CIVIC CENTER PARKING LOT SPRINKLER 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 502.26 HUMMINGBIRD HILL PARK SPRINKLER6-03275 HUMMINGBIRD HILL PARK SPRINKLER 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 195.55 MAPLEWOOD PARK SPRINKLER6-03575 MAPLEWOOD PARK SPRINKLER 16Page: 4.3.c Packet Pg. 56 Attachment: claim cks 01-25-18 (Approval of claim checks.) 01/25/2018 Voucher List City of Edmonds 17 8:10:09AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 229508 1/25/2018 (Continued)008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 314.85 FIRE STATION #16 8429 196TH ST SW / METE6-04127 FIRE STATION #16 8429 196TH ST SW / 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 907.57 FIRE STATION #16 FIRE 8429 196TH ST SW /6-04128 FIRE STATION #16 FIRE 8429 196TH ST SW 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 14.25 SEAVIEW PARK SPRINKLER6-04400 SEAVIEW PARK SPRINKLER 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 273.13 SEAVIEW PARK6-04425 SEAVIEW PARK 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 524.14 SIERRA PARK SPRINKLER6-04450 SIERRA PARK SPRINKLER 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 387.53 PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ST SW / METE6-05155 PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ST SW / 001.000.65.518.20.47.00 158.80 PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ST SW / 111.000.68.542.90.47.00 603.45 PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ST SW / 421.000.74.534.80.47.00 603.45 PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ST SW / 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 603.45 PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ST SW / 511.000.77.548.68.47.00 603.45 PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ST SW / 422.000.72.531.90.47.00 603.44 PUBLIC WORKS OMC FIRE 7110 210TH ST SW /6-05156 PUBLIC WORKS OMC FIRE 7110 210TH ST SW 001.000.65.518.20.47.00 1.78 PUBLIC WORKS OMC FIRE 7110 210TH ST SW 111.000.68.542.90.47.00 6.76 17Page: 4.3.c Packet Pg. 57 Attachment: claim cks 01-25-18 (Approval of claim checks.) 01/25/2018 Voucher List City of Edmonds 18 8:10:09AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 229508 1/25/2018 (Continued)008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION PUBLIC WORKS OMC FIRE 7110 210TH ST SW 422.000.72.531.90.47.00 6.76 PUBLIC WORKS OMC FIRE 7110 210TH ST SW 421.000.74.534.80.47.00 6.76 PUBLIC WORKS OMC FIRE 7110 210TH ST SW 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 6.76 PUBLIC WORKS OMC FIRE 7110 210TH ST SW 511.000.77.548.68.47.00 6.77 5 CORNERS ROUNDABOUT IRRIGATION6-06040 5 CORNERS ROUNDABOUT IRRIGATION 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 47.59 MATHAY BALLINGER SPRINKLER6-07775 MATHAY BALLINGER SPRINKLER 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 343.55 YOST PARK SPRINKLER6-08500 YOST PARK SPRINKLER 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 1,225.74 YOST POOL6-08525 YOST POOL 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 278.11 Total : 24,201.38 229509 1/25/2018 075200 EDUARDO ZALDIBAR 25186 SPANISH INTERPRETER COURT 01/17/2018 SPANISH INTERPRETER COURT 01/17/2018 001.000.23.512.50.41.01 108.17 Total : 108.17 229510 1/25/2018 031060 ELECSYS INTERNATIONAL CORP 171571 RADIX MONTHLY MAINT AGREEMENT Radix Monthly Maint Agreement - Jan 2018 421.000.74.534.80.48.00 152.00 RADIX MONTHLY MAINT AGREEMENT171895 Radix Monthly Maint Agreement - Feb 2018 421.000.74.534.80.48.00 152.00 Total : 304.00 18Page: 4.3.c Packet Pg. 58 Attachment: claim cks 01-25-18 (Approval of claim checks.) 01/25/2018 Voucher List City of Edmonds 19 8:10:09AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 229511 1/25/2018 008812 ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINES AR90386 ACCT#MK5648 CONTRACT 2600-02 PRINTER MAI Maintenance for printers 12/21/17 - 512.000.31.518.88.48.00 307.20 10.3% Sales Tax 512.000.31.518.88.48.00 31.64 Total : 338.84 229512 1/25/2018 076170 EN POINTE TECHNOLOGIES SALES 93247156 MICROSOFT OFFICE PROFESSIONAL & WINDOWS Microsoft Office Professional, Windows 512.000.31.518.88.48.00 55,375.32 10.3% Sales Tax 512.000.31.518.88.48.00 5,703.66 Total : 61,078.98 229513 1/25/2018 076383 ENERGY WORKS BLD20171843 REFUND: APPLICANT NOT INSTALLING NEW Refund: Applicant not installing new 001.000.257.620 4.00 Total : 4.00 229514 1/25/2018 009350 EVERETT DAILY HERALD EDH791882 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PLN20170059 - PHONE Legal Description: PLN20170059 - Phone 001.000.62.558.60.41.40 61.92 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PLN20170058 -EDH791910 Legal Description: PLN20170058 - 001.000.62.558.60.41.40 80.84 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PLN2017049 - LYONSEDH792138 Legal Description: PLN2017049 - Lyons 001.000.62.558.60.41.40 67.08 Total : 209.84 229515 1/25/2018 067113 FAST WATER HEATER COMPANY BLD20180045 REFUND: APPLICANT CANCELLED Refund: Applicant cancelled 001.000.257.620 52.00 Total : 52.00 229516 1/25/2018 066378 FASTENAL COMPANY WAMOU47397 WATER / SEWER MARKING PAINT 19Page: 4.3.c Packet Pg. 59 Attachment: claim cks 01-25-18 (Approval of claim checks.) 01/25/2018 Voucher List City of Edmonds 20 8:10:09AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 229516 1/25/2018 (Continued)066378 FASTENAL COMPANY Water / Sewer Marking Paint 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 373.06 10.3% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 38.43 SEWER - PARTSWAMOU47553 Sewer - Parts 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 67.98 10.3% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 7.00 SEWER - PARTSWAMOU47639 Sewer - Parts 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 20.56 10.3% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 2.12 Total : 509.15 229517 1/25/2018 009815 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC 0581766 METER INVENTORY - #2024 Meter Inventory - #2024 421.000.74.534.80.34.30 3,144.00 10.3% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.34.30 323.83 SEWER - SUPPLIES0582764 Sewer - Supplies 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 185.71 Freight 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 8.54 10.3% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 20.01 Total : 3,682.09 229518 1/25/2018 011900 FRONTIER 253-011-1177 PUBLIC WORKS OMC RADIO LINE PUBLIC WORKS OMC RADIO LINE TO FIVE 001.000.65.518.20.42.00 6.42 PUBLIC WORKS OMC RADIO LINE TO FIVE 111.000.68.542.90.42.00 24.40 20Page: 4.3.c Packet Pg. 60 Attachment: claim cks 01-25-18 (Approval of claim checks.) 01/25/2018 Voucher List City of Edmonds 21 8:10:09AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 229518 1/25/2018 (Continued)011900 FRONTIER PUBLIC WORKS OMC RADIO LINE TO FIVE 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 24.40 PUBLIC WORKS OMC RADIO LINE TO FIVE 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 24.40 PUBLIC WORKS OMC RADIO LINE TO FIVE 511.000.77.548.68.42.00 24.40 PUBLIC WORKS OMC RADIO LINE TO FIVE 422.000.72.531.90.42.00 24.41 TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE425-712-0417 TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 34.02 TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 34.02 PUBLIC WORKS OMC ALARM, FAX, SPARE LINES425-712-8251 PUBLIC WORKS OMC FIRE AND INTRUSION 001.000.65.518.20.42.00 16.50 PUBLIC WORKS OMC FIRE AND INTRUSION 111.000.68.542.90.42.00 82.51 PUBLIC WORKS OMC FIRE AND INTRUSION 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 69.31 PUBLIC WORKS OMC FIRE AND INTRUSION 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 69.31 PUBLIC WORKS OMC FIRE AND INTRUSION 511.000.77.548.68.42.00 92.41 CLUBHOUSE ALARM LINES 6801 MEADOWDALE RD425-745-4313 CLUBHOUSE FIRE AND INTRUSION ALARM 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 133.36 LIFT STATION #8 VG SPECIAL ACCESS LINES425-774-1031 LIFT STATION #8 TWO VOICE GRADE SPECIAL 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 47.45 CIVIC CENTER ALARM LINES 250 5TH AVE N425-775-2455 CIVIC CENTER FIRE AND INTRUSION ALARM 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 64.97 UTILITY BILLING RADIO LINE425-775-7865 21Page: 4.3.c Packet Pg. 61 Attachment: claim cks 01-25-18 (Approval of claim checks.) 01/25/2018 Voucher List City of Edmonds 22 8:10:09AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 229518 1/25/2018 (Continued)011900 FRONTIER UTILITY BILLING RADIO LINE TO FIVE 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 67.86 SNO-ISLE LIBRARY ELEVATOR PHONE LINE425-776-1281 SNO-ISLE LIBRARY ELEVATOR PHONE LINE 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 55.26 LIFT STATION #7 VG SPECIAL ACCESS LINE425-776-2742 LIFT STATION #7 V/G SPECIAL ACCESS LINE 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 26.40 FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER ALARM LINE425-776-3896 FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER FIRE AND 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 133.36 Total : 1,055.17 229519 1/25/2018 076450 GARY DESCHAMP 3-00200 #500058004-KD UTILITY REFUND #500058004-KD Utility refund due to 411.000.233.000 110.11 Total : 110.11 229520 1/25/2018 076441 GILCHRIST, RACHAEL 1/12 REFUND 1/12 REFUND ACTIVITY CANCELLATION 1/12 REFUND ACTIVITY CANCELLATION 001.000.239.200 24.00 Total : 24.00 229521 1/25/2018 063137 GOODYEAR AUTO SERVICE CENTER 142193 FLEET TIRE INVENTORY (6) Fleet Tire Inventory (6) 511.000.77.548.68.34.30 1,095.58 State Tire Fees 511.000.77.548.68.34.30 6.00 10.4% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.34.30 113.94 Total : 1,215.52 229522 1/25/2018 072515 GOOGLE INC BID-3421107426 BID/ED! GOOGLE VAULT RENEWAL FOR WEBSITE BID/Ed! Google vault renewal for 140.000.61.558.70.49.00 275.00 22Page: 4.3.c Packet Pg. 62 Attachment: claim cks 01-25-18 (Approval of claim checks.) 01/25/2018 Voucher List City of Edmonds 23 8:10:09AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total : 275.00 229522 1/25/2018 072515 072515 GOOGLE INC 229523 1/25/2018 012199 GRAINGER 9663375062 WATER - SUPPLIES Water - Supplies 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 94.48 10.3% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 9.73 Total : 104.21 229524 1/25/2018 074722 GUARDIAN SECURITY SYSTEMS 785599 OLD PW ALARM MONITORING Old PW Alarm Monitoring 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 55.00 Total : 55.00 229525 1/25/2018 069733 H B JAEGER COMPANY LLC 195563/1 SEWER - SUPPLIES Sewer - Supplies 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 152.30 10.3% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 15.69 Total : 167.99 229526 1/25/2018 074944 HALLUM, DON 1/12 REFUND 1/12 REFUND ACTIVITY CANCELLATION 1/12 REFUND ACTIVITY CANCELLATION 001.000.239.200 10.50 Total : 10.50 229527 1/25/2018 076442 HANSON, KRISTIN 1/12 REFUND 1/12 REFUND ACTIVITY CANCELLATION 1/12 REFUND ACTIVITY CANCELLATION 001.000.239.200 10.57 Total : 10.57 229528 1/25/2018 074804 HARLES, JANINE 2018 - January PHOTOGRAPHY - JANUARY 2018 Photography for January2018 001.000.61.558.70.41.00 200.00 Total : 200.00 229529 1/25/2018 012900 HARRIS FORD INC 176293 UNIT 284 - PARTS 23Page: 4.3.c Packet Pg. 63 Attachment: claim cks 01-25-18 (Approval of claim checks.) 01/25/2018 Voucher List City of Edmonds 24 8:10:09AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 229529 1/25/2018 (Continued)012900 HARRIS FORD INC Unit 284 - Parts 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 49.42 10.4% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 5.14 UNIT 451 - HINGE ASSEMBLY176475 Unit 451 - Hinge Assembly 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 66.76 10.4% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 6.94 Total : 128.26 229530 1/25/2018 069409 HARRIS, LAURIE 1/12 REFUND 1/12 REFUND CREDIT ON ACCOUNT 1/12 REFUND CREDIT ON ACCOUNT 001.000.239.200 21.00 Total : 21.00 229531 1/25/2018 074966 HIATT CONSULTING LLC 2017-54 TOURISM PROMOTION AND MARKETING, WEBSITE Tourism promotion and marketing for 120.000.31.575.42.41.00 1,666.00 Tourism website maintenance 120.000.31.575.42.41.00 200.00 Total : 1,866.00 229532 1/25/2018 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 1012046 PM: WALL CAPS PM: WALL CAPS 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 16.44 10.0% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 1.64 PM: CHAIN LINK TIES1013063 PM: CHAIN LINK TIES 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 164.40 10.0% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 16.44 PM: FL DAYLIGHT1561886 PM: FL DAYLIGHT 24Page: 4.3.c Packet Pg. 64 Attachment: claim cks 01-25-18 (Approval of claim checks.) 01/25/2018 Voucher List City of Edmonds 25 8:10:09AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 229532 1/25/2018 (Continued)067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 14.98 10.0% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 1.50 PM: PARTS FOR BLN PLUMBING1586640 PM: PARTS FOR BLN PLUMBING 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 17.66 10.0% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 1.77 PM: SILT FENCE FOR CIVIC2012993 PM: SILT FENCE FOR CIVIC 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 744.21 10.0% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 74.42 PM: FLASHLIGHT, TUB2083203 PM: FLASHLIGHT, TUB 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 28.96 10.0% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 2.90 PM: BROOMS, DUST PANS, SQUEEGEE, POLE3084047 PM: BROOMS, DUST PANS, SQUEEGEE, POLE 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 198.74 10.0% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 19.87 PM: LANDSCAPE ADH4023887 PM: LANDSCAPE ADH 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 7.47 10.0% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 0.75 PM: TOTES5012568 PM: TOTES 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 84.79 10.0% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 8.48 PM: BIT SET, PLIERS, CRIMPER5023728 25Page: 4.3.c Packet Pg. 65 Attachment: claim cks 01-25-18 (Approval of claim checks.) 01/25/2018 Voucher List City of Edmonds 26 8:10:09AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 229532 1/25/2018 (Continued)067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES PM: BIT SET, PLIERS, CRIMPER 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 101.15 10.0% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 10.12 PM: CONCRETUBE, BELL END5025875 PM: CONCRETUBE, BELL END 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 9.57 10.0% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 0.96 PM: PVC, TAPE, ELBOWS6012458 PM: PVC, TAPE, ELBOWS 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 24.72 10.0% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 2.47 PM: WHITEWOOD STUD6023559 PM: WHITEWOOD STUD 130.000.64.536.50.31.00 11.48 10.0% Sales Tax 130.000.64.536.50.31.00 1.15 PM: TARP, STAPLES, HEATER7011638 10.0% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 9.06 PM: TARP, STAPLES, HEATER 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 90.55 PM: KNEELER BD, LQD DMNT, CREVICE TOOL9026586 PM: KNEELER BD, LQD DMNT, CREVICE TOOL 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 53.86 10.0% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 5.39 Total : 1,725.90 229533 1/25/2018 073548 INDOFF INCORPORATED 3054214 COPY PAPER Copy paper 001.000.31.514.23.31.00 239.94 10.3% Sales Tax 26Page: 4.3.c Packet Pg. 66 Attachment: claim cks 01-25-18 (Approval of claim checks.) 01/25/2018 Voucher List City of Edmonds 27 8:10:09AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 229533 1/25/2018 (Continued)073548 INDOFF INCORPORATED 001.000.31.514.23.31.00 24.71 CITY CLERKS FASTEN FOLDERS3056865 2 BOXES - SMEAD PRESSBOARD FASTENER 001.000.25.514.30.31.00 122.94 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.25.514.30.31.00 12.66 BEVERAGE CUPS FOR JURORS3058552 FILE FOLDERS 001.000.23.512.50.31.00 217.75 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.23.512.50.49.20 4.36 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.23.512.50.31.00 22.43 BEVERAGE CUPS FOR JURORS 001.000.23.512.50.49.20 42.36 Total : 687.15 229534 1/25/2018 076228 INSLEE BEST DOEZIE & RYDER PS 232102 INV 232102 ACCOUNT 365565-0002 IA INVEST 1/2 COST EXTERNAL IA INVESTIGATION 001.000.41.521.10.41.00 2,794.50 Total : 2,794.50 229535 1/25/2018 014940 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS 300-10035044 SHOP SUPPLIES Shop Supplies 511.000.77.548.68.31.20 47.88 10.3% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.20 4.93 PM: EAR PLUGS300-10035436 PM: EAR PLUGS 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 29.95 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 3.08 Total : 85.84 229536 1/25/2018 075356 JENNIFER ZIEGLER PUBLIC 031 STATE LOBBYIST FOR JANUARY 2018 27Page: 4.3.c Packet Pg. 67 Attachment: claim cks 01-25-18 (Approval of claim checks.) 01/25/2018 Voucher List City of Edmonds 28 8:10:09AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 229536 1/25/2018 (Continued)075356 JENNIFER ZIEGLER PUBLIC State lobbyist for January 2018 001.000.61.511.70.41.00 3,358.00 Total : 3,358.00 229537 1/25/2018 017050 KWICK'N KLEEN CAR WASH 01102018-1 INV#01102018-1 - EDMONDS PD - DEC 2017 24 CAR WASHES @ $5.06 (INC TX) 001.000.41.521.22.48.00 121.44 Total : 121.44 229538 1/25/2018 076443 LADD, YVONNE 1/12 REFUND 1/12 REFUND CREDIT ON ACCOUNT 1/12 REFUND CREDIT ON ACCOUNT 001.000.239.200 13.00 Total : 13.00 229539 1/25/2018 074417 LAW OFFICE OF CHRISTIAN SMITH 148 CONFLICT COUNSEL 7Z1316955 CONFLICT COUNSEL 7Z1316955 001.000.39.512.52.41.00 300.00 Total : 300.00 229540 1/25/2018 076198 LEBERG, GAYLE 01192018 TAMING BIGFOOT REIMBURSEMENT Reimbursement for Taming Bigfoot 421.000.74.537.90.49.00 350.00 Total : 350.00 229541 1/25/2018 067725 LES SCHWAB TIRE CENTER 80500220868 UNIT 66 - 3 TIRES Unit 66 - 3 Tires 511.000.77.548.68.34.30 1,427.99 State Tire Tax 511.000.77.548.68.34.30 3.00 10.3% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.34.30 147.08 Total : 1,578.07 229542 1/25/2018 076444 LEWIS, DANA 1/12 REFUND 1/12 REFUND CREDIT ON ACCOUNT 1/12 REFUND CREDIT ON ACCOUNT 001.000.239.200 21.00 28Page: 4.3.c Packet Pg. 68 Attachment: claim cks 01-25-18 (Approval of claim checks.) 01/25/2018 Voucher List City of Edmonds 29 8:10:09AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total : 21.00 229542 1/25/2018 076444 076444 LEWIS, DANA 229543 1/25/2018 076445 LIN-CHUNG, WEI-PING 1/12 REFUND 1/12 REFUND CREDIT ON ACCOUNT 1/12 REFUND CREDIT ON ACCOUNT 001.000.239.200 12.13 Total : 12.13 229544 1/25/2018 075480 MADATH, DONNA 6447 EDMONDS POLICE 6447 EDMONDS POLICE TOUR 6447 EDMONDS POLICE TOUR 001.000.64.571.22.41.00 85.80 Total : 85.80 229545 1/25/2018 068670 MARSHBANK CONSTRUCTION INC Fin#133 MARSHBANK HYDRANT DEPOSIT REFUND Marshbank Hydrant Deposit Refund 421.000.245.110 950.00 Total : 950.00 229546 1/25/2018 076446 MC GILLIE, MARY 1/12 REFUND 1/12 REFUND CREDIT ON ACCOUNT 1/12 REFUND CREDIT ON ACCOUNT 001.000.239.200 12.13 Total : 12.13 229547 1/25/2018 019920 MCCANN, MARIAN 84 REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT 009.000.39.517.20.29.00 6,245.00 Total : 6,245.00 229548 1/25/2018 020039 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO 54040322 WWTP: WRENCHES,WIRE CLOTHS,LATCHES,COUPL WRENCHES,WIRE 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 641.42 Freight 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 29.90 WWTP: HOSE COUPLING,PIPE FITTING54238823 HOSE COUPLING,PIPE FITTING 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 84.67 Freight 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 7.43 29Page: 4.3.c Packet Pg. 69 Attachment: claim cks 01-25-18 (Approval of claim checks.) 01/25/2018 Voucher List City of Edmonds 30 8:10:09AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 229548 1/25/2018 (Continued)020039 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO WWTP: BRACKETS,AHCNORS,CONNECTORS,TROLLE54267354 BRACKETS,AHCNORS,CONNECTORS,TROLLEY,PULL 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 409.90 Freight 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 12.25 WWTP: TUBE FITTINGS,SCREWS,NUTS,STEEL PA54423501 TUBE FITTINGS,SCREWS,NUTS,STEEL PAINT 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 267.54 Freight 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 14.38 Total : 1,467.49 229549 1/25/2018 069923 MOTION INDUSTRIES INC WA33-745424 WWTP: HI-VOL BALL BEARINGS HI-VOL BALL BEARINGS 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 119.28 10.3% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 12.29 WWTP:P BALL BEARINGS UC207-22WA33-745722 BALL BEARINGS UC207-22 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 27.62 10.3% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 2.84 Total : 162.03 229550 1/25/2018 021983 MOTOR TRUCKS INC ME127280 UNIT 106 - BLOWER MOTOR Unit 106 - Blower Motor 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 166.49 10.3% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 17.14 Total : 183.63 229551 1/25/2018 076447 MURPHY, NAOMI 1/12 REFUND 1/12 REFUND CREDIT ON ACCOUNT 1/12 REFUND CREDIT ON ACCOUNT 001.000.239.200 10.50 30Page: 4.3.c Packet Pg. 70 Attachment: claim cks 01-25-18 (Approval of claim checks.) 01/25/2018 Voucher List City of Edmonds 31 8:10:09AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total : 10.50 229551 1/25/2018 076447 076447 MURPHY, NAOMI 229552 1/25/2018 064570 NATIONAL SAFETY INC 0492970-IN SEWER - CREW RAIN GEAR Sewer - Crew Rain Gear 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 383.80 10.3% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 39.53 Total : 423.33 229553 1/25/2018 024302 NELSON PETROLEUM 0645259-IN FLEET FILTER INVENTORY Fleet Filter Inventory 511.000.77.548.68.34.40 45.36 10.3% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.34.40 4.67 Total : 50.03 229554 1/25/2018 076448 NORDSTEDT, LINDA 1/12 REFUND 1/12 REFUND CREDIT ON ACCOUNT 1/12 REFUND CREDIT ON ACCOUNT 001.000.239.200 12.00 Total : 12.00 229555 1/25/2018 065720 OFFICE DEPOT 993665052001 INV#993665052001 ACCT#90520437-EDMONDS P DRY ERASE BOARD FOR DAWSON 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 79.99 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 8.24 PW OFFICE SUPPLIES994373556001 PW Office Supplies 001.000.65.518.20.31.00 52.49 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.65.518.20.31.00 5.41 PW OFFICE SUPPLIES994374245001 PW Office Supplies 001.000.65.518.20.31.00 95.46 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.65.518.20.31.00 9.83 31Page: 4.3.c Packet Pg. 71 Attachment: claim cks 01-25-18 (Approval of claim checks.) 01/25/2018 Voucher List City of Edmonds 32 8:10:09AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 229555 1/25/2018 (Continued)065720 OFFICE DEPOT PW - ADMIN SUPPLIES994374246001 PW - Admin Supplies 001.000.65.518.20.31.00 149.94 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.65.518.20.31.00 15.44 PW OFFICE SUPPLIES995212810001 PW Office Supplies 001.000.65.518.20.31.00 80.12 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.65.518.20.31.00 8.25 P&R ACCOUNT 90520437995656748001 P&R: ADDING MACHINE ROLL 001.000.64.571.21.31.00 6.53 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.64.571.21.31.00 0.67 P&R ACCOUNT 90520437995657326001 P&R: MOUSEPAD 001.000.64.571.21.31.00 10.30 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.64.571.21.31.00 1.06 WATER/SEWER - HAND SANITIZERS996213506001 Water/Sewer - Hand Sanitizers 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 35.90 Water/Sewer - Hand Sanitizers 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 35.89 Street/Storm - Hand Sanitizers 111.000.68.542.90.31.00 35.90 Street/Storm - Hand Sanitizers 422.000.72.531.90.31.00 35.89 10.3% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 3.70 10.3% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 3.70 10.3% Sales Tax 32Page: 4.3.c Packet Pg. 72 Attachment: claim cks 01-25-18 (Approval of claim checks.) 01/25/2018 Voucher List City of Edmonds 33 8:10:09AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 229555 1/25/2018 (Continued)065720 OFFICE DEPOT 111.000.68.542.90.31.00 3.70 10.3% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.31.00 3.69 PW OFFICE SUPPLIES996213773001 PW Office Supplies 001.000.65.518.20.31.00 4.16 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.65.518.20.31.00 0.43 PW ADMIN SUPPLIES996317563001 PW Admin Supplies 001.000.65.518.20.31.00 46.44 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.65.518.20.31.00 4.78 Total : 737.91 229556 1/25/2018 073896 OLYMPIC BRAKE SUPPLY 2-419381 UNIT 453 - RACK & PINION PLUS CORE FEE Unit 453 - Rack & Pinion plus Core Fee 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 458.48 10.3% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 47.22 UNIT 453 - RETURNED CORE2-420389 Unit 453 - Returned Core 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 -150.00 10.3% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 -15.45 Total : 340.25 229557 1/25/2018 072739 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 3685-307676.FLEET FILTERS Fleet Filters 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 27.03 10.3% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 2.78 FLEET WIPER BLADES3685-316031 Fleet Wiper Blades 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 12.86 33Page: 4.3.c Packet Pg. 73 Attachment: claim cks 01-25-18 (Approval of claim checks.) 01/25/2018 Voucher List City of Edmonds 34 8:10:09AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 229557 1/25/2018 (Continued)072739 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 10.3% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 1.32 FLEET RETURNS3685-316038 Fleet Returns 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 -12.86 10.3% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 -1.34 UNIT M-16 WIPER BLADES3685-316039 Unit M-16 Wiper Blades 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 17.98 10.3% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 1.85 UNIT 72 - MARKER LIGHTS3685-317444 Unit 72 - Marker Lights 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 15.96 10.3% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 1.64 UNIT 106 - RADIATOR CAP3685-320228 Unit 106 - Radiator cap 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 14.85 10.3% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 1.53 FLEET V BELT3685-321008 Fleet V Belt 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 29.65 10.3% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 3.05 UNIT 10 - V BELT3685-321024 Unit 10 - V Belt 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 29.91 10.3% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 3.08 FLEET RETURN3685-321053 Fleet Return 34Page: 4.3.c Packet Pg. 74 Attachment: claim cks 01-25-18 (Approval of claim checks.) 01/25/2018 Voucher List City of Edmonds 35 8:10:09AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 229557 1/25/2018 (Continued)072739 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 -29.65 10.3% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 -3.05 UNIT 400 - IGNITION3685-321364 Unit 400 - Ignition 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 10.99 10.3% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 1.13 UNIT 2 - FLASHERS3685-323267 Unit 2 - Flashers 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 15.19 10.3% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 1.56 UNIT 106 - FILTER3685-323716 Unit 106 - Filter 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 15.87 10.3% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 1.63 FLEET RETURNS3745-141861 Fleet Returns 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 -44.97 10.3% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 -4.63 STREET DEPT - BELT FOR CONCRETE GRINDERRP3745-131645 Street Dept - Belt for Concrete Grinder 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 20.70 10.3% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 2.13 Total : 136.19 229558 1/25/2018 064951 OTIS ELEVATOR CO SS06279G218 PW ELEVATOR MAINT SVC CONTRACT FROM PW Elevator Maint Svc Contract from 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 3,593.64 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 370.15 35Page: 4.3.c Packet Pg. 75 Attachment: claim cks 01-25-18 (Approval of claim checks.) 01/25/2018 Voucher List City of Edmonds 36 8:10:09AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total : 3,963.79 229558 1/25/2018 064951 064951 OTIS ELEVATOR CO 229559 1/25/2018 026830 PACIFIC PLUMBING SUPPLY 04288268 SHED FIRE REPLACEMENT TOOLS Shed Fire Replacement Tools 001.000.66.518.30.35.00 1,132.38 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.35.00 116.64 Total : 1,249.02 229560 1/25/2018 028860 PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY INC P436285 WWTP: STR-CU/MALL COAT/HUBS STR-CU/MALL COAT/HUBS 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 866.13 10.3% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 89.21 Total : 955.34 229561 1/25/2018 073231 POLYDYNE INC 1203523 WWTP: CLARIFLOC Clarifloc 423.000.76.535.80.31.51 8,211.00 10.3% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.51 845.73 Total : 9,056.73 229562 1/25/2018 071811 PONY MAIL BOX & BUSINESS CTR 1112725 MAGIC SKY SVC - STORM - RETURN POSTAGE Magic Sky Svc - Storm - Return Postage 422.000.72.531.90.49.00 42.49 Packageing 422.000.72.531.90.49.00 4.00 10.3% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.49.00 0.39 AED ONE STOP SHOP - FAC MAINT - RETURN1112849 AED One Stop Shop - Fac Maint - Return 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 27.59 WWTP: SHIP CHG-RETURN VIDEO TO L&I1112856 Ship Charge - return dvd to L&I 423.000.76.535.80.42.00 31.77 36Page: 4.3.c Packet Pg. 76 Attachment: claim cks 01-25-18 (Approval of claim checks.) 01/25/2018 Voucher List City of Edmonds 37 8:10:09AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total : 106.24 229562 1/25/2018 071811 071811 PONY MAIL BOX & BUSINESS CTR 229563 1/25/2018 064088 PROTECTION ONE 291104 ALARM MONITORING - PARKS MAINT./FS #16 ALARM MONITORING FOR PARKS MAINTENANCE 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 22.22 ALARM MONITORING FOR PARKS MAINTENANCE 001.000.64.576.80.42.00 22.20 ALARM MONITORING FOR FIRE STATION #16 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 151.86 Total : 196.28 229564 1/25/2018 030400 PUGET SOUND CLEAN AIR AGENCY 18-038S Q1-2018 CLEAN AIR ASSESSMENT Q1-18 Clean Air Assessment per RCW 001.000.39.553.70.51.00 8,975.75 Total : 8,975.75 229565 1/25/2018 070809 PUGET SOUND EXECUTIVE 18-0015 COURT SECURITY 01/02/2018-01/12/2018 COURT SECURITY 01/02/2018-01/12/2018 001.000.23.512.50.41.00 2,530.00 PROBATION SECURITY DV-MRT 01/03/2018 001.000.23.523.30.41.00 178.75 Total : 2,708.75 229566 1/25/2018 066786 RELIABLE SECURITY SOUND & DATA 22520 INV#22520 - EDMONDS PD MAXXESS SINGLE DOOR CONTROLLER 001.000.41.521.11.41.00 280.88 HID ARCH WALL SWITCH 001.000.41.521.11.41.00 180.25 MAXXESS BUPS W/ENCLOSURE 001.000.41.521.11.41.00 218.75 HES 1006 SMART ELECRIC STRIKE 001.000.41.521.11.41.00 371.25 HES SMARTPAC 3 IN-LINE PWR CONT 001.000.41.521.11.41.00 57.09 SENTROL STEEL DOOR CONTACT 001.000.41.521.11.41.00 9.38 37Page: 4.3.c Packet Pg. 77 Attachment: claim cks 01-25-18 (Approval of claim checks.) 01/25/2018 Voucher List City of Edmonds 38 8:10:09AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 229566 1/25/2018 (Continued)066786 RELIABLE SECURITY SOUND & DATA SECURITRON MOTION EXIT DECTECT 001.000.41.521.11.41.00 121.50 MISC MATERIAL HARDWARE 001.000.41.521.11.41.00 406.25 INSTALL & PROGRAMMING INC TRAVEL 001.000.41.521.11.41.00 2,316.00 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.11.41.00 408.02 Total : 4,369.37 229567 1/25/2018 064769 ROMAINE ELECTRIC 5-016656 UNIT 960 - BATTERY Unit 960 - Battery 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 107.78 10.3% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 11.10 UNIT 872 - BATTERY5-016682 Unit 872 - Battery 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 87.47 10.3% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 9.01 UNIT 93 - BATTERY5-016719 Unit 93 - Battery 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 99.76 10.3% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 10.28 UNIT 29 - BATTERY5-016735 Unit 29 - Battery 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 83.35 10.3% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 8.59 Total : 417.34 229568 1/25/2018 076017 SEATTLE HISTORIC WINDOW CO 381 MUSEUM - WINDOW SASH LOCKS Museum - Window Sash Locks 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 226.08 38Page: 4.3.c Packet Pg. 78 Attachment: claim cks 01-25-18 (Approval of claim checks.) 01/25/2018 Voucher List City of Edmonds 39 8:10:09AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 229568 1/25/2018 (Continued)076017 SEATTLE HISTORIC WINDOW CO 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 23.29 Total : 249.37 229569 1/25/2018 063306 SHERWIN-WILLIAMS 5518-9 PM: PAINT YOST POOL PM: PAINT YOST POOL 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 249.35 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 25.68 Total : 275.03 229570 1/25/2018 076452 SMITH, STEPHANIE 1/17 REFUND 1/17 REFUND CREDIT BALANCE ON ACCOUNT 1/17 REFUND CREDIT BALANCE ON ACCOUNT 001.000.239.200 55.00 Total : 55.00 229571 1/25/2018 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 2002-0254-7 PEDEST CAUTION LIGHT 21930 95TH AVE W / PEDEST CAUTION LIGHT 21930 95TH AVE W / 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 16.60 TRAFFIC LIGHT 22000 84TH AVE W / METER 12003-4823-3 TRAFFIC LIGHT 22000 84TH AVE W / METER 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 46.84 FIRE STATION #16 8429 196TH ST SW / METE2003-9895-6 FIRE STATION #16 8429 196TH ST SW / 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 846.96 MAPLEWOOD PARK IRRIGATION METER2004-9314-6 MAPLEWOOD PARK IRRIGATION METER 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 18.32 LIFT STATION #10 17526 TALBOT RD / METER2004-9683-4 LIFT STATION #10 17526 TALBOT RD / 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 113.00 LIFT STATION #9 19300 80TH AVE W / METER2006-1131-7 LIFT STATION #9 19300 80TH AVE W / 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 155.78 SEAVIEW PARK2007-1403-8 39Page: 4.3.c Packet Pg. 79 Attachment: claim cks 01-25-18 (Approval of claim checks.) 01/25/2018 Voucher List City of Edmonds 40 8:10:09AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 229571 1/25/2018 (Continued)037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 SEAVIEW PARK 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 23.68 TRAFFIC LIGHT 961 PUGET DR / METER 100002007-2302-1 TRAFFIC LIGHT 961 PUGET DR / METER 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 31.32 SEAVIEW RESERVOIR 18520 90TH AVE W / MET2007-3984-5 SEAVIEW RESERVOIR 18520 90TH AVE W / 421.000.74.534.80.47.00 21.38 LIFT STATION #3 1529 NORTHSTREAM LN / ME2008-6520-2 LIFT STATION #3 1529 NORTHSTREAM LN / 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 86.13 SEAVIEW PARK2011-9708-4 SEAVIEW PARK 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 94.88 PINE ST PARK2013-2711-1 PINE ST PARK 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 16.60 PEDEST CAUTION LIGHT 9110 OLYMPIC VIEW D2014-3123-6 PEDEST CAUTION LIGHT 9110 OLYMPIC VIEW 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 17.74 TRAFFIC LIGHT 21531 HWY 99 / METER 100042014-4175-5 TRAFFIC LIGHT 21531 HWY 99 / METER 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 260.82 SNO-ISLE LIBRARY 650 MAIN ST / METER 1002015-5174-4 SNO-ISLE LIBRARY 650 MAIN ST / METER 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 2,698.54 TRAFFIC LIGHT 9932 220TH ST SW / METER 12017-5147-6 TRAFFIC LIGHT 9932 220TH ST SW / METER 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 72.25 ALDERWOOD INTERIE 6130 168TH ST SW / MET2017-9000-3 ALDERWOOD INTERIE 6130 168TH ST SW / 421.000.74.534.80.47.00 21.15 PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ST SW / METE2019-4248-9 PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ST SW / 001.000.65.518.20.47.00 98.75 40Page: 4.3.c Packet Pg. 80 Attachment: claim cks 01-25-18 (Approval of claim checks.) 01/25/2018 Voucher List City of Edmonds 41 8:10:09AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 229571 1/25/2018 (Continued)037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ST SW / 111.000.68.542.90.47.00 375.25 PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ST SW / 421.000.74.534.80.47.00 375.25 PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ST SW / 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 375.25 PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ST SW / 511.000.77.548.68.47.00 375.25 PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ST SW / 422.000.72.531.90.47.00 375.27 9TH/CASPER LANDSCAPED BED2022-5062-7 9TH/CASPER LANDSCAPED BED 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 18.32 TRAFFIC LIGHT 21931 HWY 99 / METER 100042022-8945-0 TRAFFIC LIGHT 21931 HWY 99 / METER 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 103.48 CIVIC CENTER & FIRE STATION #17 250 5TH2022-9166-2 CIVIC CENTER & FIRE STATION #17 250 5TH 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 5,834.46 STREET LIGHT 7601 RIDGE WAY / NOT METERE2023-8937-5 STREET LIGHT 7601 RIDGE WAY / NOT 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 8.59 CITY HALL 121 5TH AVE N / METER 100012612024-3924-6 CITY HALL 121 5TH AVE N / METER 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 4,316.30 TRAFFIC LIGHT 8429 196TH ST SW (FS #16)2028-0763-2 TRAFFIC LIGHT 8429 196TH ST SW (FIRE 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 19.74 FIVE CORNERS RESERVOIR 8519 BOWDOIN WAY2036-5215-1 FIVE CORNERS RESERVOIR 8519 BOWDOIN WAY 421.000.74.534.80.47.00 325.67 LIFT STATION #2 702 MELODY LN / METER 102044-2584-7 LIFT STATION #2 702 MELODY LN / METER 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 114.70 LIFT STATION #5 432 3RD AVE S / METER 102051-8438-5 41Page: 4.3.c Packet Pg. 81 Attachment: claim cks 01-25-18 (Approval of claim checks.) 01/25/2018 Voucher List City of Edmonds 42 8:10:09AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 229571 1/25/2018 (Continued)037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 LIFT STATION #5 432 3RD AVE S / METER 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 27.22 PEDEST CAUTION LIGHTS 8410 MAIN ST /2202-1638-6 PEDEST CAUTION LIGHTS 8410 MAIN ST / 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 95.79 TRAFFIC LIGHT SR104 @ 236TH ST SW / METE2205-4757-4 TRAFFIC LIGHT SR104 @ 236TH ST SW / 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 69.38 Total : 17,450.66 229572 1/25/2018 063941 SNO CO SHERIFFS OFFICE 2017-4311 CRS ON 2017-4311 SNO CO DEC 2017 CR 10 HOUSING @ $96.13 -GAMA 11/17 001.000.39.523.60.51.00 -961.30 CR 5 MED/SPEC @ $55.25 -PETTY 2/17 001.000.39.523.60.51.00 -276.25 CR 3 MED/SPEC @ $55.55-WALKER 3/17 001.000.39.523.60.51.00 -165.75 CR 5 MEN/HEALTH $133.39-WALKER 3/17 001.000.39.523.60.51.00 -666.95 CR 7 MEN/HEALTH $133.39-WALKER 4/17 001.000.39.523.60.51.00 -933.73 CR 31 MEN/HEALTH @$133.39-WALKER - 5/17 001.000.39.523.60.51.00 -4,135.09 CR 30 MEN/HEALTH @$133.39-WALKER - 6/30 001.000.39.523.60.51.00 -4,001.70 CR 1/2 MED/SPEC @ $55.25-STEACH 4/17 001.000.39.523.60.51.00 -27.63 CR 1 MED/SPEC @$55.25-WADE - 5/17 001.000.39.523.60.51.00 -55.25 CR 7 MEN/HEALTH @$133.39 -WADE 5/17 001.000.39.523.60.51.00 -933.73 INV#2017-4311 EDMONDS JAIL - DEC 20172017-4311 368.58 BASE HOUSING @ $96.13 001.000.39.523.60.51.00 35,431.60 42Page: 4.3.c Packet Pg. 82 Attachment: claim cks 01-25-18 (Approval of claim checks.) 01/25/2018 Voucher List City of Edmonds 43 8:10:09AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 229572 1/25/2018 (Continued)063941 SNO CO SHERIFFS OFFICE 52.75 BOOKINGS @ $118.23 001.000.39.523.60.51.00 6,236.63 51.5 MED/SPEC @ $55.25 001.000.39.523.60.51.00 2,845.38 67.42 MENTAL/HEALTH @ $133.39 001.000.39.523.60.51.00 8,993.15 11.50 VIDEO COURT @ $115.50 001.000.39.523.60.51.00 1,328.25 Total : 42,677.63 229573 1/25/2018 037075 SNOHOMISH CO AUDITOR'S OFFICE I-VR-4 2017 VOTER REGISTRATION DISTRICT PORTION 2017 Voter Registration - District 001.000.39.514.90.51.00 54,501.44 Total : 54,501.44 229574 1/25/2018 037303 SO SNOHOMISH CO FIRE & RESCUE EDMS 2018-2 FEB-2018 FIRE SERVICES CONTRACT Feb-2018 Fire Services Contract Payment 001.000.39.522.20.51.00 614,893.17 Total : 614,893.17 229575 1/25/2018 042750 TRIBUZIO, WALLACE 7 REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT 009.000.39.517.20.23.00 242.02 Total : 242.02 229576 1/25/2018 070902 ULVESTAD, KAREN 6164 DIGITAL PHOTO 6164 DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHY 6164 DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHY 001.000.64.571.22.41.00 322.00 Total : 322.00 229577 1/25/2018 070767 UNITED RENTALS NW INC 153388377-001 PM: BOOM GENIE PM: BOOM GENIE 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 1,621.23 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 166.99 43Page: 4.3.c Packet Pg. 83 Attachment: claim cks 01-25-18 (Approval of claim checks.) 01/25/2018 Voucher List City of Edmonds 44 8:10:09AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total : 1,788.22 229577 1/25/2018 070767 070767 UNITED RENTALS NW INC 229578 1/25/2018 068724 US HEALTHWORKS MED GROUP OF WA 0761340-WA DOT TESTING DOT TESTING 111.000.68.542.90.41.00 99.00 Total : 99.00 229579 1/25/2018 064423 USA BLUE BOOK 462110 SEWER - SUPPLIES Sewer - Supplies 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 212.91 Freight 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 29.83 10.3% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 25.00 Total : 267.74 229580 1/25/2018 076454 VAN HOLLEBEKE, MONDA 01192018 TAMING BIGFOOT REIMBURSEMENT Taming Bigfoot reimbursement 421.000.74.537.90.49.00 63.68 Total : 63.68 229581 1/25/2018 076382 VANDENBERGHE, BENJAMIN BLD20171619 REFUND: APPLICANT WANTS CONTRACTOR TO Refund: Applicant wants contractor to 001.000.257.620 120.00 Total : 120.00 229582 1/25/2018 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS 9799804250 C/A 671247844-00001 Cell Service-Eng 001.000.67.518.21.42.00 77.66 Cell Service Fac-Maint 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 75.38 Cell Service-PD 001.000.41.521.22.42.00 253.00 Cell Service-PW Street/Storm 111.000.68.542.90.42.00 18.68 Cell Service-PW Street/Storm 44Page: 4.3.c Packet Pg. 84 Attachment: claim cks 01-25-18 (Approval of claim checks.) 01/25/2018 Voucher List City of Edmonds 45 8:10:09AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 229582 1/25/2018 (Continued)067865 VERIZON WIRELESS 422.000.72.531.90.42.00 18.68 Cell Service-PW Water 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 18.68 Cell Service-PW Sewer 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 56.04 Cell Service-WWTP 423.000.76.535.80.42.00 18.68 Total : 536.80 229583 1/25/2018 045912 WASPC DUES 2018-00154 INV DUES 2018-00154 - COMPAAN - EDMONDS 2018 ACTIVE DUES - COMPAAN 001.000.41.521.10.49.00 305.00 Total : 305.00 229584 1/25/2018 026510 WCIA 14067 2018 UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK INSURANCE 2018 PW Underground Storage Tank 511.000.77.548.68.46.00 2,137.00 Total : 2,137.00 229585 1/25/2018 075635 WCP SOLUTIONS 10466540 FAC MAINT - BOWL MOP, FRESH SCENT, Fac Maint - Bowl Mop, Fresh Scent, 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 1,015.21 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 104.57 FAC MAINT - CLEANERS, HAND SOAP,10476804 Fac Maint - Cleaners, Hand Soap, 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 1,547.93 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 159.44 FAC MAINT - SUPPLIES10481240 Fac Maint - Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 85.40 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 8.80 45Page: 4.3.c Packet Pg. 85 Attachment: claim cks 01-25-18 (Approval of claim checks.) 01/25/2018 Voucher List City of Edmonds 46 8:10:09AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total : 2,921.35 229585 1/25/2018 075635 075635 WCP SOLUTIONS 229586 1/25/2018 048100 WEINZ, JACK D 85 REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT 617.000.51.517.20.23.00 1,272.00 Total : 1,272.00 229587 1/25/2018 073552 WELCO SALES LLC 7413 UTILITY BILLING - 5000 PINK SHEETS Utility Billing - 5000 Pink Sheets 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 61.11 Utility Billing - 5000 Pink Sheets 422.000.72.531.90.31.00 61.11 Utility Billing - 5000 Pink Sheets 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 61.11 10.3% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 6.29 10.3% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.31.00 6.29 10.3% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 6.30 ENVELOPES FOR DEV. SERV. DEPT.7420 Envelopes for Dev. Serv. Dept. 001.000.62.524.10.31.00 367.30 INV#7422 - EDMONDS PD7422 PRINTING OF 6 NEW BUSINESS CARDS 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 115.02 NEW UP OF 2 NEW NAMES 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 24.00 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 14.32 Total : 722.85 229588 1/25/2018 075926 WESTERN EXTERMINATOR 1626721 PS - MONTHLY SVC PS - Monthly Svc 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 99.00 10.3% Sales Tax 46Page: 4.3.c Packet Pg. 86 Attachment: claim cks 01-25-18 (Approval of claim checks.) 01/25/2018 Voucher List City of Edmonds 47 8:10:09AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 229588 1/25/2018 (Continued)075926 WESTERN EXTERMINATOR 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 10.20 Total : 109.20 229589 1/25/2018 064008 WETLANDS & WOODLANDS 22688 FLOWER PROGRAM: PLANTS FLOWER PROGRAM: PLANTS 001.000.64.576.81.31.00 549.25 7.7% sales tax 001.000.64.576.81.31.00 42.29 Total : 591.54 229590 1/25/2018 072634 WHISTLE WORKWEAR TR-390553 PM: RAINGEAR, VEST PM: RAINGEAR, VEST 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 161.97 9.7% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 15.71 Total : 177.68 229591 1/25/2018 066678 WSDA PESTICIDE MGMT DIVISION BOND EXAM AND LIC BOND EXAM AND LIC IPM BOND EXAM AND LIC IPM 001.000.64.576.80.49.00 58.00 Total : 58.00 229592 1/25/2018 061047 WWCPA 2018 Renewals CERTIFICATION RENEWALS FOR WATER- J Certification Renewals for Water- J 421.000.74.534.80.49.00 100.00 Certification Renewals for Sewer - T 423.000.75.535.80.49.00 120.00 Total : 220.00 Bank total : 969,242.60 121 Vouchers for bank code :usbank 969,242.60Total vouchers :Vouchers in this report 121 47Page: 4.3.c Packet Pg. 87 Attachment: claim cks 01-25-18 (Approval of claim checks.) 01/25/2018 Voucher List City of Edmonds 48 8:10:09AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 48Page: 4.3.c Packet Pg. 88 Attachment: claim cks 01-25-18 (Approval of claim checks.) PROJECT NUMBERS (By Engineering Number) Funding Engineering Project Number Project Accounting Number Project Title STR E1AA c342 Five Corners Roundabout (212th Street SW @ 84th Avenue W) STR E1CA c368 76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements STR E1DA c354 Sunset Walkway Improvements STM E1FM c374 Dayton Street & SR104 Storm Drainage Alternatives STM E1FN c376 Perrinville Creek Culvert Replacement STR E2AA c391 Transportation Plan Update STR E2AB c392 9th Avenue Improvement Project STR E2AD c405 Hwy 99 Enhancements (Phase III) STM E2FA c378 North Talbot Road Drainage Improvements STM E2FB c379 SW Edmonds Basin #3-238th St. SW to Hickman Park Infiltration System STM E2FC c380 Edmonds Marsh Feasibility Study SWR E2GB c390 2013 Sanitary Sewer Pipe Rehabilitation STR E3AB c427 SR104 Corridor Transportation Study STR E3DB c423 238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave) STR E3DC c424 15th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to 8th Ave) STR E3DD c425 236th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Madrona School) STR E3DE c426 ADA Curb Ramp Upgrades along 3rd Ave S STM E3FC c408 Perrinville Creek Stormwater Flow Reduction Retrofit Study STM E3FE c410 Northstream Pipe Abandonment on Puget Drive STM E3FG c429 Storm Drainage Improvements - 88th & 194th STM E3FH c430 SW Edmonds-105th/106th Ave W Storm Improvements SWR E3GA c398 2013 Sewerline Replacement Project WTR E3JB c418 224th Waterline Relocation (2013) FAC E3LB c419 ESCO III Project STR E4CA c438 2014 Overlay Program STR E4CB c451 2014 Chip Seals WTR E4CC c452 2014 Waterline Overlays STR E4CD c462 220th Street Overlay Project STR E4DA c453 Train Trench - Concept STR E4DB c454 SR104/City Park Mid-Block Crossing STM E4FA c433 2014 Drainage Improvements STM E4FB c434 LID Retrofits Perrinville Creek Basin STM E4FC c435 Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration STM E4FD c436 Lake Ballinger Associated Projects STM E4FE c455 Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station STM E4FF c459 Video Assessment of Stormwater Lines SWR E4GA c441 2015 Sewerline Replacement Project SWR E4GB c456 Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase I SWR E4GC c461 Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study Revised 2/2/2018 4.3.d Packet Pg. 89 Attachment: Copy of FrequentlyUsedProjNumbers (003) [Revision 1] (Approval of claim checks.) PROJECT NUMBERS (By Engineering Number) Funding Engineering Project Number Project Accounting Number Project Title WWTP E4HA c446 Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring WTR E4JB c440 2015 Waterline Replacement Program WTR E4JC c460 2016 Water Comp Plan Update FAC E4LA c444 Public Safety Controls System Upgrades PRK E4MA c417 City Spray Park FAC E4MB c443 Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab STR E5AA c470 Trackside Warning System STR E5AB c471 2015 Traffic Calming STR E5CA c463 2015 Overlay Program WTR E5CB c475 2015 Waterline Overlays SWR E5CC i007 2015 Sewerline Overlays STR E5DA c474 Bikelink Project General E5DB c478 Edmonds Waterfront Access Analysis STM E5FA c466 2015 Citywide Drainage Improvements/Rehab Projects STM E5FB c467 Update Stormwater Management Code & Associated Projects STM E5FC c472 Dayton Street Storm Improvements (6th Ave - 8th Ave) STM E5FD c479 Seaview Park Infiltration Facility STM E5FE c484 12th Ave & Sierra Stormwater System Improvements SWR E5GA c469 2016 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Projects SWR E5GB s011 Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study WWTP E5HA c481 WWTP Outfall Pipe Modifications WTR E5JA c468 2016 Waterline Replacement Projects WTR E5JB c482 Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave) WTR E5KA c473 Five Corners Reservoir Re-coating FAC E5LA c476 A/V Upgrades - Council Chambers UTILITIES E5NA s010 Standard Details Updates STR E6AA s014 Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization STR E6AB i015 Citywide Protected/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion STR E6CA i008 2016 Overlay Program WTR E6CB i009 2016 Waterline Overlays SWR E6CC i010 2016 Sewerline Overlays STR E6DA c485 238th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Hwy 99) STR E6DB s016 ADA Transition Plan STR E6DC i016 2016 Curb Ramp Upgrades STR E6DD i017 Minor Sidewalk Program STM E6FA i011 Northstream Culvert Repair Under Puget Drive STM E6FB c486 224th & 98th Drainage Improvements STM E6FC i012 3rd Ave Rain Gardens STM E6FD s017 Stormwater Comp Plan Update Revised 2/2/2018 4.3.d Packet Pg. 90 Attachment: Copy of FrequentlyUsedProjNumbers (003) [Revision 1] (Approval of claim checks.) PROJECT NUMBERS (By Engineering Number) Funding Engineering Project Number Project Accounting Number Project Title STM E6FE c491 183rd Pl SW Storm Repairs SWR E6GA i013 2017 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Project SWR E6GB c488 Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase II SWR E6GC c492 2018/19 Sewerline Replacement Project UTILITIES E6JA s013 Utility Rate Update WTR E6JB i014 2017 Waterline Replacement Projects WTR E6JC c493 2018 Waterline Replacement Project PRK E6MA c480 Veteran's Plaza PRK E6MB c477 FAC Band Shell Replacement PRK E6MC c494 Yost Park Spa STR E7AA i021 2017 Traffic Calming STR E7AB i024 Audible Pedestrian Signals STR E7AC i005 228th St. SW Corridor Improvements STR E7CA i018 2017 Overlay Program WTR E7CB i019 2017 Waterline Overlays SWR E7CC i020 2017 Sewerline Overlays STR E7CD i025 89th Pl W Retaining Wall STR E7DA i022 2017 Curb Ramp Upgrades STR E7DB i023 2017 Minor Sidewalk Program STR E7DC i026 Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements STM E7FA m105 OVD Slope Repair & Stabilization STM E7FB c495 Storm Drain Improvements @ 9510 232nd St. SW STM E7FG m013 NPDES (Students Saving Salmon) WTR E7JA c498 2019 Waterline Replacement PM E7MA c276 Dayton Street Plaza PRK E7MA m103 Waterfront Restoration STR E8AA i027 2018 Traffic Calming STR E8AB i028 220th Adaptive STR E8CA i029 76th Ave W & 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements STR E8CB i030 2018 Overlay Program STR E8CC i031 84th Ave W Overlay from 220th to 212th WTR E8CD i034 2018 Waterline Overlays SWR E8CE i035 2018 Sewerline Overlays STR E8DA i032 2018 Minor Sidewalk Project STR E8DB i033 ADA Curb Ramps PM E8MA c282 Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor Revised 2/2/2018 4.3.d Packet Pg. 91 Attachment: Copy of FrequentlyUsedProjNumbers (003) [Revision 1] (Approval of claim checks.) 01/29/2018 Voucher List City of Edmonds 1 11:52:57AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 229593 1/25/2018 003075 BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY E5AA.BNSF Main E5AA.MAIN CONTRACT PAYMENT E5AA.Main Contract Payment 112.000.68.595.33.65.41 12,393.00 Total : 12,393.00 229594 1/25/2018 003075 BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY E5AA.BNSF Dayton E5AA.DAYTON CONTRACT PAYMENT E5AA.Dayton Contract Payment 112.000.68.595.33.65.41 4,206.00 Total : 4,206.00 Bank total : 16,599.00 2 Vouchers for bank code :usbank 16,599.00Total vouchers :Vouchers in this report 2 1Page: 4.3.e Packet Pg. 92 Attachment: Reissue Voucher List 01-25-18 (Approval of claim checks.) 02/01/2018 City of Edmonds12:20PM 01/16/2018 to 01/31/2018- Type 2 Cycle 24 Payroll Final Check ListpyChkLst Page: 1 Bank: dirdep - US Bank Check #Date Employee #Name Check Amt Direct Deposit 97713 2/5/2018 2716 0.00 401.64BUCKSHNIS, DIANE 97714 2/5/2018 1356 0.00 656.46CHASE, SANDRA S 97715 2/5/2018 2713 0.00 1,340.85FRALEY-MONILLAS, ADRIENNE 97716 2/5/2018 2829 0.00 880.89JOHNSON, KRISTIANA 97717 2/5/2018 3072 0.00 1,090.48JUDGE, MAUREEN 97718 2/5/2018 2913 0.00 1,549.60MESAROS, THOMAS W 97719 2/5/2018 2956 0.00 1,753.28NELSON, MICHAEL 97720 2/5/2018 2988 0.00 1,532.93TEITZEL, DAVID L 97721 2/5/2018 2989 0.00 1,662.49TIBBOTT, NEIL 97722 2/5/2018 1207 0.00 2,235.49EARLING, DAVID O 97723 2/5/2018 2802 0.00 2,538.45LAFAVE, CAROLYN JC 97724 2/5/2018 3059 0.00 963.12DERRICK, CARLY 97725 2/5/2018 2398 0.00 3,665.95HARDIE, MARY ANN 97726 2/5/2018 3007 0.00 1,638.22WAGENER, EMILY 97727 2/5/2018 2958 0.00 917.74CHOI, SOPHIA 97728 2/5/2018 2673 0.00 1,871.41CLIFTON, AMBER R 97729 2/5/2018 2928 0.00 3,089.12COBURN, LINDA W 97730 2/5/2018 3067 0.00 254.78DELOS REYES, RAYMOND 97731 2/5/2018 2986 0.00 1,905.09GAMEZ, OMAR 97732 2/5/2018 1904 0.00 1,774.72GARNEY, RENEE A 97733 2/5/2018 2828 0.00 1,781.27GRANT, TAMMY 97734 2/5/2018 3022 0.00 1,498.59HASLAM, CARRIE 97735 2/5/2018 2761 0.00 931.50KERNS, LAUREN E 97736 2/5/2018 2907 0.00 119.89MOHANDESON, MICHAEL 97737 2/5/2018 3033 0.00 2,585.47WHITTAKER, SHARON 97738 2/5/2018 2672 0.00 1,954.20JACOBSON, NORI 97739 2/5/2018 1707 0.00 4,496.59JAMES, N SCOTT 97740 2/5/2018 1796 0.00 1,944.05KENYON, DENISE D 97741 2/5/2018 2806 0.00 2,278.64MAGER, SARAH 97742 2/5/2018 1835 0.00 2,021.08PALMER, LORI K 97743 2/5/2018 2808 0.00 1,940.37SATTERLUND, SUE D 97744 2/5/2018 1878 0.00 2,107.14SHARP, DEBRA L 97745 2/5/2018 3017 0.00 3,137.14TURLEY, DAVID 97746 2/5/2018 2675 0.00 2,288.46COCKRUM, MARK 97747 2/5/2018 2605 0.00 2,303.32ROHDE, DAVID W 97748 2/5/2018 2856 0.00 1,670.00STEVENS, KEVIN 97749 2/5/2018 2859 0.00 3,522.49TULEY, BRIAN 97750 2/5/2018 2003 0.00 2,020.43HYND, LINDA Page: 1 4.3.f Packet Pg. 93 Attachment: 02-01-18 Payroll (Approval of claim checks.) 02/01/2018 City of Edmonds12:20PM 01/16/2018 to 01/31/2018- Type 2 Cycle 24 Payroll Final Check ListpyChkLst Page: 2 Bank: dirdep - US Bank Check #Date Employee #Name Check Amt Direct Deposit 97751 2/5/2018 2976 0.00 1,351.56JOHNSON, GAYLE 97752 2/5/2018 2894 0.00 3,506.31PASSEY, SCOTT 97753 2/5/2018 2944 0.00 1,521.92QUAN, SUSAN 97754 2/5/2018 0946 0.00 4,244.78ANDERSON, DONALD F 97755 2/5/2018 0028 0.00 3,689.59BARD, MICHAEL J 97756 2/5/2018 0454 0.00 3,064.36BARKER, ROBERT 97757 2/5/2018 2832 0.00 2,713.07BICKAR, NICHOLAS LEWIS 97758 2/5/2018 2947 0.00 2,638.20BORST, DIETRICH 97759 2/5/2018 1105 0.00 3,608.10BOWER, MICHEAL C 97760 2/5/2018 0864 0.00 1,635.05BROMAN, MINDY A 97761 2/5/2018 3024 0.00 3,338.87BRUGGMAN, MICHAEL BOONE 97762 2/5/2018 2881 0.00 3,265.64CLARK, PATRICK J 97763 2/5/2018 1645 0.00 1,734.91COLLINS, AMY M 97764 2/5/2018 0345 0.00 2,466.65COMPAAN, ALAN D 97765 2/5/2018 1134 0.00 2,756.51COMPTON, DOUGLAS F 97766 2/5/2018 1771 0.00 3,650.90CRYSTAL, H KENNETH 97767 2/5/2018 2402 0.00 1,774.49DIEHL, SHARON R 97768 2/5/2018 0190 0.00 2,417.48DREYER, TIMOTHY E 97769 2/5/2018 2377 0.00 1,032.05EAGER, MARLENE A 97770 2/5/2018 1367 0.00 2,766.54FALK, ERIC M 97771 2/5/2018 2464 0.00 3,262.16FROLAND, MARK J 97772 2/5/2018 2899 0.00 2,812.93GAGNER, SAMUEL G 97773 2/5/2018 3069 0.00 1,584.04GIAMMALVA, JOCELYN 97774 2/5/2018 3050 0.00 1,623.76GILGINAS, JESSICA 97775 2/5/2018 2978 0.00 3,222.34GOVANTES, JULIE 97776 2/5/2018 1448 0.00 3,462.33GREENMUN, AARON P 97777 2/5/2018 2178 0.00 4,913.67HARDWICK, ALAN L 97778 2/5/2018 2945 0.00 2,515.74HAUGHIAN, NICHOLAS 97779 2/5/2018 1894 0.00 3,866.93HAWLEY, SHANE J 97780 2/5/2018 3051 0.00 1,477.70HENDERSON, JENNIFER 97781 2/5/2018 2952 0.00 2,703.92HWANG, JOSHUA Y 97782 2/5/2018 3070 0.00 1,536.46JAMES, ASHLEY 97783 2/5/2018 2990 0.00 2,560.52JOHNSEN, BRITTANY 97784 2/5/2018 0358 0.00 3,792.26JONES, JEFFREY D 97785 2/5/2018 1528 0.00 2,392.87KINNEY, DONALD D 97786 2/5/2018 1469 0.00 3,837.31LAWLESS, JAMES R 97787 2/5/2018 2269 0.00 3,285.55LEE, JUSTIN D 97788 2/5/2018 1015 0.00 3,774.29MACHADO, DAVID L Page: 2 4.3.f Packet Pg. 94 Attachment: 02-01-18 Payroll (Approval of claim checks.) 02/01/2018 City of Edmonds12:20PM 01/16/2018 to 01/31/2018- Type 2 Cycle 24 Payroll Final Check ListpyChkLst Page: 3 Bank: dirdep - US Bank Check #Date Employee #Name Check Amt Direct Deposit 97789 2/5/2018 2066 0.00 2,086.82MANDEVILLE, LYNNETTE K 97790 2/5/2018 1879 0.00 3,326.70MCCLURE, JOSHUA D 97791 2/5/2018 1608 0.00 3,281.60MCINTYRE, BRIAN V 97792 2/5/2018 2601 0.00 4,489.37MEHL, ANDREW M 97793 2/5/2018 1843 0.00 2,632.57MILLS, GREGORY B 97794 2/5/2018 1563 0.00 3,077.03MOORE, MELBRE K 97795 2/5/2018 1790 0.00 3,200.85MORRISON, STEPHEN J 97796 2/5/2018 2994 0.00 2,568.62PECK, ROBERT WILLIAM 97797 2/5/2018 1106 0.00 4,318.49PLOEGER, KENNETH D 97798 2/5/2018 2082 0.00 2,979.82POFF, MICHELLE A 97799 2/5/2018 1555 0.00 0.00RAMSEUR, RACHEL J 97800 2/5/2018 1104 0.00 4,073.84RICHARDSON, MICHAEL B 97801 2/5/2018 2715 0.00 4,533.41ROBINSON, JASON P 97802 2/5/2018 0886 0.00 3,286.46ROTH, KARL L 97803 2/5/2018 3060 0.00 749.66ROUSSEAU, KRISTI 97804 2/5/2018 3040 0.00 2,247.21SAUNDERS, ASHLEY 97805 2/5/2018 2720 0.00 1,793.69SCHEELE, DARCIE E 97806 2/5/2018 2890 0.00 1,241.20SCHICK, JILL A 97807 2/5/2018 2381 0.00 2,676.65SHIER, JASON J 97808 2/5/2018 2664 0.00 2,309.71SHOEMAKE, TABATHA S 97809 2/5/2018 2230 0.00 2,627.09SMITH, DAMIAN JO 97810 2/5/2018 1619 0.00 2,626.11SMITH, RICHARD T 97811 2/5/2018 2610 0.00 3,823.79SPEER, RYAN K 97812 2/5/2018 3045 0.00 2,585.13STANLEY, MARCUS J.X. 97813 2/5/2018 2833 0.00 2,813.20STRUM, KRAIG ROY 97814 2/5/2018 1522 0.00 2,709.12SUTTON, ROSS E 97815 2/5/2018 2985 0.00 2,562.88SWARTZ, SIERRA 97816 2/5/2018 2378 0.00 1,963.04THOMPSON, CAROLINE L 97817 2/5/2018 2527 0.00 3,337.36TRYKAR, STACIE M 97818 2/5/2018 2500 0.00 3,664.33YAMANE, EARL M 97819 2/5/2018 0039 0.00 552.38BARNARD, EARL 97820 2/5/2018 0040 0.00 669.52COOPER, JACK 97821 2/5/2018 2850 0.00 16.42KLEIN, RALPH 97822 2/5/2018 0049 0.00 2,889.36WEINZ, JACK 97823 2/5/2018 0385 0.00 2,181.58CRUZ, CYNTHIA L 97824 2/5/2018 2935 0.00 4,472.06DOHERTY, PATRICK 97825 2/5/2018 1124 0.00 4,018.56CHAVE, ROBERT W 97826 2/5/2018 2540 0.00 2,637.53CLUGSTON, MICHAEL Page: 3 4.3.f Packet Pg. 95 Attachment: 02-01-18 Payroll (Approval of claim checks.) 02/01/2018 City of Edmonds12:20PM 01/16/2018 to 01/31/2018- Type 2 Cycle 24 Payroll Final Check ListpyChkLst Page: 4 Bank: dirdep - US Bank Check #Date Employee #Name Check Amt Direct Deposit 97827 2/5/2018 0067 0.00 2,112.75CUNNINGHAM, DIANE M 97828 2/5/2018 2469 0.00 1,912.38MACHUGA, JENNIFER L 97829 2/5/2018 2948 0.00 2,884.90SHIPLEY, BRAD MICHAEL 97830 2/5/2018 3046 0.00 2,247.05SZAFRAN, MICHELE 97831 2/5/2018 2668 0.00 3,520.60BJORBACK, LEIF 97832 2/5/2018 3041 0.00 2,425.47CARTER, ERIC 97833 2/5/2018 2898 0.00 2,140.95JOHNS, KRISTIN LEE 97834 2/5/2018 2809 0.00 3,129.32MILLER, CHARLES R 97835 2/5/2018 2393 0.00 2,441.89THOMPSON, MILTON 97836 2/5/2018 2626 0.00 1,961.27THORNQUIST, LINDA J 97837 2/5/2018 2912 0.00 4,746.97HOPE, SHANE 97838 2/5/2018 2946 0.00 1,251.63NELSON, DENISE 97839 2/5/2018 1640 0.00 998.12SPELLMAN, JANA M 97840 2/5/2018 2257 0.00 1,621.66THIES, MICHAEL DEAN 97841 2/5/2018 2996 0.00 1,664.38WAYLAND, CHRISTINA 97842 2/5/2018 2762 0.00 3,903.35DELILLA, MICHELE F 97843 2/5/2018 2658 0.00 4,250.24ENGLISH, ROBERT S 97844 2/5/2018 2903 0.00 3,109.32HAGUE, RYAN 97845 2/5/2018 2555 0.00 3,194.70HAUSS, BERTRAND 97846 2/5/2018 2584 0.00 1,895.36LAMBERT, JENNIFER R 97847 2/5/2018 2079 0.00 1,241.00LUTTRELL, MEGAN N 97848 2/5/2018 1441 0.00 2,408.85MCCONNELL, JEANIE L 97849 2/5/2018 3068 0.00 2,958.61RICHARDSON, ZACHARY 97850 2/5/2018 2891 0.00 2,196.89RIVERA, CHRIS 97851 2/5/2018 2941 0.00 3,105.53SCHRODER, HENRY 97852 2/5/2018 2396 0.00 2,947.69SIBREL, EDWARD C 97853 2/5/2018 2403 0.00 2,281.46ZULAUF, JOANNE 97854 2/5/2018 2983 0.00 62.08AREVALO, SEFRAH 97855 2/5/2018 2887 0.00 11.68BABCOCK, SUSAN M 97856 2/5/2018 2297 0.00 1,779.41BAROKAS, VASILIKI 97857 2/5/2018 2330 0.00 300.97BEVINGTON, JERRIE 97858 2/5/2018 2893 0.00 234.46BIRKLAND, VALRIE M 97859 2/5/2018 1624 0.00 2,621.26CHAPIN, FRANCES WHITE 97860 2/5/2018 2991 0.00 611.25COLLEY, CASEY 97861 2/5/2018 2857 0.00 605.57CONLEY, LISA M 97862 2/5/2018 2434 0.00 2,973.32CORT, TODD R 97863 2/5/2018 2926 0.00 2,080.48CRUZ, CYNTHIA 97864 2/5/2018 3029 0.00 134.28DAY, CHARLOTTE Page: 4 4.3.f Packet Pg. 96 Attachment: 02-01-18 Payroll (Approval of claim checks.) 02/01/2018 City of Edmonds12:20PM 01/16/2018 to 01/31/2018- Type 2 Cycle 24 Payroll Final Check ListpyChkLst Page: 5 Bank: dirdep - US Bank Check #Date Employee #Name Check Amt Direct Deposit 97865 2/5/2018 3048 0.00 313.04FUJI, AIMEE 97866 2/5/2018 2766 0.00 4,608.64HITE, CARRIE S 97867 2/5/2018 3030 0.00 120.21IMMUCCI, DEANNA 97868 2/5/2018 3053 0.00 330.25KELLY, JADEN 97869 2/5/2018 2972 0.00 2,318.24LEACH, JENNIFER 97870 2/5/2018 2937 0.00 170.65NORMAN, CHRISTINE M 97871 2/5/2018 2717 0.00 820.11PARKER, MICHELE 97872 2/5/2018 2993 0.00 370.66PIZZUTO, MIA R 97873 2/5/2018 2414 0.00 2,657.33RANKINS, TAMMY 97874 2/5/2018 2925 0.00 1,790.29ROSE, LAURIE 97875 2/5/2018 2276 0.00 1,559.04STEELE-SMITH, PATRICIA 97876 2/5/2018 3036 0.00 433.33VOEHL, CHRISTIE 97877 2/5/2018 2918 0.00 1,725.76ARBANASIN, KIMBERLY A 97878 2/5/2018 2914 0.00 1,830.40BIRD, ERIC E 97879 2/5/2018 2999 0.00 1,508.04BOND, J TONY 97880 2/5/2018 1783 0.00 2,350.45CURRAN, JESSE J 97881 2/5/2018 2542 0.00 1,984.88DILL, DEBRA M 97882 2/5/2018 2084 0.00 1,824.10EDHOUSE, JEREMY 97883 2/5/2018 1085 0.00 2,258.29EDWARDS, CLIFFORD E 97884 2/5/2018 2785 0.00 2,160.66FREEBORN, ROBERT D 97885 2/5/2018 3061 0.00 1,906.36KAMACHO, COLE 97886 2/5/2018 0949 0.00 1,737.81MCGOWAN, STEPHEN P 97887 2/5/2018 2181 0.00 1,958.74ROCKNE, ANDREW G 97888 2/5/2018 3003 0.00 1,725.55SIENKO, JEFF 97889 2/5/2018 1292 0.00 2,205.35FISHER, STEPHEN D 97890 2/5/2018 2921 0.00 1,979.63NAPOLITINO, ROYCE WM 97891 2/5/2018 2754 0.00 4,498.47WILLIAMS, PHIL H 97892 2/5/2018 2922 0.00 1,877.27BRINKLEY, SARAH 97893 2/5/2018 2007 0.00 1,679.49CHINN, PENNY J 97894 2/5/2018 2961 0.00 1,924.96CLEVELAND, PATRICK 97895 2/5/2018 0075 0.00 2,252.59HOUSLER, DAN 97896 2/5/2018 3018 0.00 1,516.66KEENER, ALFRED 97897 2/5/2018 2412 0.00 693.70LAFAVE, LARRY M 97898 2/5/2018 2965 0.00 2,466.63ROLFE, JAMES 97899 2/5/2018 1460 0.00 1,552.52SOMERS, JAMES C 97900 2/5/2018 2995 0.00 3,412.44SULLIVAN, THOMAS 97901 2/5/2018 3015 0.00 1,482.00WILLIAMS, DAVID 97902 2/5/2018 1877 0.00 2,172.01BROWN, MICHAEL E Page: 5 4.3.f Packet Pg. 97 Attachment: 02-01-18 Payroll (Approval of claim checks.) 02/01/2018 City of Edmonds12:20PM 01/16/2018 to 01/31/2018- Type 2 Cycle 24 Payroll Final Check ListpyChkLst Page: 6 Bank: dirdep - US Bank Check #Date Employee #Name Check Amt Direct Deposit 97903 2/5/2018 2662 0.00 2,016.07CLEMENS, BRYAN D 97904 2/5/2018 2301 0.00 2,117.24HARRIS, KYLE 97905 2/5/2018 2953 0.00 2,010.66HILL, RYAN 97906 2/5/2018 0247 0.00 2,710.76JOHNSON, MICHAEL R 97907 2/5/2018 3052 0.00 1,622.04JUSTICE, TREVYR 97908 2/5/2018 1548 0.00 3,117.46MOLES, TOD D 97909 2/5/2018 3020 0.00 1,715.02WARD JR, JAMES 97910 2/5/2018 2081 0.00 1,926.35WHATMORE, JEFFREY J 97911 2/5/2018 1805 0.00 2,205.85BACH, TOM L 97912 2/5/2018 1786 0.00 2,862.70BROWNING, DARREN W 97913 2/5/2018 1797 0.00 2,612.59HANSON, TODD L 97914 2/5/2018 2321 0.00 2,052.83JOHNSON, PATRICK R 97915 2/5/2018 2840 0.00 1,893.71MERBACK, SKYLAR F 97916 2/5/2018 1787 0.00 2,574.33SANDERS, WILLIAM T 97917 2/5/2018 3016 0.00 1,724.47BECK, JAMES 97918 2/5/2018 1733 0.00 2,073.35DANIELS, JASON E 97919 2/5/2018 2463 0.00 2,272.05KOBYLK, JEFF J 97920 2/5/2018 2541 0.00 3,524.93KUHNHAUSEN, KRIS 97921 2/5/2018 2529 0.00 2,024.60LEONARD, STEVEN P 97922 2/5/2018 2073 0.00 1,961.14RAYMOND, CARLA M 97923 2/5/2018 2576 0.00 2,039.65ROCHFORD, PATRICK J 97924 2/5/2018 0877 0.00 2,015.45SHORE, RICHARD D 97925 2/5/2018 1355 0.00 0.00SMITH, VINCENT L 97926 2/5/2018 1689 0.00 2,897.61WAITE, JAMES T 97927 2/5/2018 1576 0.00 2,241.90CLEMENS, JAMES B 97928 2/5/2018 1615 0.00 2,317.86CRAWFORD, DONALD L 97929 2/5/2018 1220 0.00 2,542.18HARRIS, TIMOTHY A 97930 2/5/2018 2666 0.00 2,717.79LEDER II, DAVID 97931 2/5/2018 2090 0.00 2,782.04LONG, SOKHOM 97932 2/5/2018 2055 0.00 2,239.13MATTHEWS, STEVEN R 97933 2/5/2018 1452 0.00 2,051.08WICHERS, RICK L 97934 2/5/2018 3004 0.00 1,685.27CHLIEK, BATYAH 97935 2/5/2018 2855 0.00 2,522.19DUENAS, ERIC JOHN 97936 2/5/2018 2714 0.00 2,652.27GARCIA, DANIEL 97937 2/5/2018 2902 0.00 0.00JONES-THOMAS, JONATHAN 97938 2/5/2018 2815 0.00 2,489.05KORSTAD, DANIEL W 97939 2/5/2018 2842 0.00 2,634.31KRESTEL, LESLIE 97940 2/5/2018 2901 0.00 2,393.12MCKENZIE, JEANNE Page: 6 4.3.f Packet Pg. 98 Attachment: 02-01-18 Payroll (Approval of claim checks.) 02/01/2018 City of Edmonds12:20PM 01/16/2018 to 01/31/2018- Type 2 Cycle 24 Payroll Final Check ListpyChkLst Page: 7 Bank: dirdep - US Bank Check #Date Employee #Name Check Amt Direct Deposit 97941 2/5/2018 0366 0.00 2,254.37NORDQUIST, JAMES M 97942 2/5/2018 3023 0.00 1,985.56PANGELINAN, FRED 97943 2/5/2018 2799 0.00 4,030.38RANDOLPH, PAMELA J 97944 2/5/2018 2449 0.00 2,702.29SLENKER, ROBERT G 97945 2/5/2018 0257 0.00 2,504.34VAN PELT, MICHAEL 97946 2/5/2018 2613 0.00 1,540.94VAUGHAN, ERIC W 97947 2/5/2018 2002 0.00 2,772.02ADAMS, MICHAEL H 97948 2/5/2018 2862 0.00 2,022.13MYERS, DAVID M 97949 2/5/2018 2597 0.00 2,369.61RUGG, CARL M 0.00 530,712.60Employee Check Totals 0.00 530,712.60Bank dirdep Totals (237 Forms) Page: 7 4.3.f Packet Pg. 99 Attachment: 02-01-18 Payroll (Approval of claim checks.) 02/01/2018 City of Edmonds12:20PM 01/16/2018 to 01/31/2018- Type 2 Cycle 24 Payroll Final Check ListpyChkLst Page: 8 Bank: usbank - US Bank Check #Date Employee #Name Check Amt Direct Deposit 63144 2/5/2018 3026 239.80 0.00BOUFFIOU, VALERIE 63145 2/5/2018 2954 98.37 1,297.05MERRITT, CHELSEA LEANNE 63146 2/5/2018 2215 147.00 3,060.00HAWKINS, JAIME I 63147 2/5/2018 1611 1,547.32 0.00JOHNSON, DEBORAH A 63148 2/5/2018 2583 1,673.20 0.00GODBEY, TIM M 63149 2/5/2018 0137 3,105.50 0.00LINDSAY, RICHARD D 63150 2/5/2018 0881 707.39 1,925.00HIATT, CHUCK M 63151 2/5/2018 1347 1,739.56 750.00CLAY, JON E 63152 2/5/2018 1219 3,889.14 0.00SEBERS, RODERICK ROY 13,147.28 7,032.05Employee Check Totals Bank: usbank - US Bank Benefit Checks Check #Date Payee #Name Check Amt Direct Deposit 2/5/2018 garn2 -472.99 0.00CACH, LLC, C/O MANDARICH LAW G 63153 2/5/2018 epoa 1,196.00 0.00EPOA-1 POLICE 63154 2/5/2018 epoa4 130.00 0.00EPOA-4 POLICE SUPPORT 63155 2/5/2018 jhan 889.22 0.00JOHN HANCOCK, LTC POLICY HOLDE 63156 2/5/2018 flex 1,981.68 0.00NAVIA BENEFIT SOLUTIONS 63157 2/5/2018 icma 3,758.20 0.00VANTAGE TRANSFER AGENTS 304884 7,482.11Total 0.00 7,482.11 0.00 Payee Totals 20,629.39 7,032.05Bank usbank Totals (15 Forms) Page: 8 4.3.f Packet Pg. 100 Attachment: 02-01-18 Payroll (Approval of claim checks.) 02/01/2018 City of Edmonds12:20PM 01/16/2018 to 01/31/2018- Type 2 Cycle 24 Payroll Final Check ListpyChkLst Page: 9 Bank: wire - US BANK Benefit Checks Check #Date Payee #Name Check Amt Direct Deposit 2666 2/5/2018 pens 280,904.72 0.00DEPT OF RETIREMENT SYSTEMS 2667 2/5/2018 aflac 5,739.52 0.00AFLAC, ATTN: REMITTANCE 2671 2/5/2018 mebt 99,073.31 0.00WTRISC FBO #N3177B1 2672 2/5/2018 us 92,902.60 0.00US BANK 2673 2/5/2018 wadc 26,300.09 0.00WASHINGTON STATE TREASURER 2675 2/5/2018 pb 5,343.94 0.00NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTION 2677 2/5/2018 oe 299.00 0.00OFFICE OF SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT 510,563.18Total 0.00 510,563.18 0.00 Payee Totals 510,563.18 0.00Bank wire Totals (7 Forms) Grand Total 531,192.57 537,744.65 1,068,937.22Next Step: Account Posting (AP) Pay Period is Open (Locked) Totals Checks and Direct Deposit (259 Forms) Page: 9 4.3.f Packet Pg. 101 Attachment: 02-01-18 Payroll (Approval of claim checks.) 02/01/2018 City of Edmonds12:20PM 01/16/2018 to 01/31/2018- Type 2 Cycle 24 Payroll Final Check ListpyChkLst Page: 10 Employee Gender Statistics Number of males paid 152 1 Number of females paid 93 Total Employees Paid 246 Page: 10 4.3.f Packet Pg. 102 Attachment: 02-01-18 Payroll (Approval of claim checks.) City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 02/6/2018 Acknowledge receipt of a Claim for Damages from Colleen Connolly (amount undetermined), Kirsten Johnson ($293.82), and Anna Hurd ($410.31). Staff Lead: Claims Department: City Clerk's Office Preparer: Linda Hynd Background/History N/A Staff Recommendation Acknowledge receipt of the Claims for Damages by minute entry. Narrative Colleen Connolly 8010 224th St. SW Edmonds, WA 98026 (amount undetermined) Kirsten Johnson 9405 218th Pl. SW Edmonds, WA 98020 ($293.82) Anna Hurd 8713 238th St. SW #A2 Edmonds, Wa 98026 ($410.31) Attachments: Johnson Claim for Damages Connolly Claim redacted 4.4 Packet Pg. 103 4.4.a Packet Pg. 104 Attachment: Johnson Claim for Damages (Claims for Damages) 4.4.a Packet Pg. 105 Attachment: Johnson Claim for Damages (Claims for Damages) 4.4.a Packet Pg. 106 Attachment: Johnson Claim for Damages (Claims for Damages) 4.4.a Packet Pg. 107 Attachment: Johnson Claim for Damages (Claims for Damages) 4.4.a Packet Pg. 108 Attachment: Johnson Claim for Damages (Claims for Damages) 4.4.b Packet Pg. 109 Attachment: Connolly Claim redacted (Claims for Damages) 4.4.b Packet Pg. 110 Attachment: Connolly Claim redacted (Claims for Damages) City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 02/6/2018 Surplus City Computers Staff Lead: Brian Tuley Department: Information Services Preparer: Scott Passey Background/History Fifty (50) City computers were decommissioned in 2017 and are now ready to surplus. Staff Recommendation Information Services is submitting the attached list of computers that are beyond their useful life for Council approval to surplus. Narrative The equipment listed in the attached list has outlived its useful life with the City. Information Systems requests permission to recycle equipment listed and remove from City inventory. This equipment has no residual value. Attachments: Surplus_20171201 4.5 Packet Pg. 111 Model Model #Serial #Purchase Date HP ProBook 4540s laptop C6Z37UT#ABA 2CE30909X5 28-Feb-13 HP ProBook 4540s laptop D8C12UT#ABA 2CE3351JVF 11-Dec-13 HP ProBook 4540s laptop D8C12UT#ABA 2CE3382FZ0 24-Sep-13 HP Workstation Z220 A3J45AV 2UA2420WS3 18-Oct-12 HP Workstation Z220 A3J45AV 2UA2420WS6 18-Oct-12 HP Workstation Z220 A3J45AV 2UA2420WS7 18-Oct-12 HP EliteBook 8440P laptop NU545AV CND03802D6 24-Sep-10 HP EliteBook 6930p laptop KK082AV MXL020164Z 26-May-10 HP Compaq 8200 Elite USDT PC H2F93US#ABA MXL2180RN7 7-May-12 HP Compaq 8200 Elite USDT PC H2F93US#ABA MXL2180RN8 7-May-12 HP Compaq 8200 Elite USDT PC H2F93US#ABA MXL2180RN9 7-May-12 HP Compaq 8200 Elite USDT PC H2F93US#ABA MXL2180RND 7-May-12 HP Compaq 8200 Elite USDT PC H2F93US#ABA MXL2180RNH 7-May-12 HP Compaq 8200 Elite USDT PC H2F93US#ABA MXL2180RNK 7-May-12 HP Compaq 8200 Elite USDT PC H2F93US#ABA MXL2180RNL 7-May-12 HP Compaq 8200 Elite USDT PC H2F93US#ABA MXL2180RNN 7-May-12 HP Compaq 8200 Elite USDT PC H2F93US#ABA MXL2180RNP 7-May-12 HP Compaq 8200 Elite USDT PC H2F93US#ABA MXL2180RNQ 7-May-12 HP Compaq 8200 Elite USDT PC H2F93US#ABA MXL2180RNV 7-May-12 HP Compaq 8200 Elite USDT PC H2F93US#ABA MXL218135S 7-May-12 HP Compaq 8200 Elite USDT PC H2F93US#ABA MXL218135W 7-May-12 HP Compaq 8300 Elite USDT PC QV997AV MXL2431TJ7 26-Oct-12 HP Compaq 8300 Elite USDT PC QV997AV MXL2431TJ8 26-Oct-12 HP Compaq 8300 Elite USDT PC QV997AV MXL2431TJ9 26-Oct-12 HP Compaq 8300 Elite USDT PC QV997AV MXL2431TJB 26-Oct-12 HP Compaq 8300 Elite USDT PC QV997AV MXL2431TJC 26-Oct-12 HP Compaq 8300 Elite USDT PC B9C46AW#ABA MXL3070HLR 14-Feb-13 HP Compaq 8300 Elite USDT PC B9C46AW#ABA MXL3070HLS 14-Feb-13 HP Compaq 8300 Elite USDT PC B9C46AW#ABA MXL3070HLT 14-Feb-13 HP Compaq 8300 Elite USDT PC B9C46AW#ABA MXL3070HLV 14-Feb-13 HP Compaq 8300 Elite USDT PC B9C46AW#ABA MXL3070HLW 14-Feb-13 HP Compaq 8300 Elite USDT PC B9C46AW#ABA MXL3070J6B 14-Feb-13 HP Compaq 8300 Elite USDT PC B9C46AW#ABA MXL3070J6D 14-Feb-13 HP Compaq 8300 Elite USDT PC B9C46AW#ABA MXL3070J6F 14-Feb-13 HP Compaq 8300 Elite USDT PC B9C46AW#ABA MXL3070J6L 14-Feb-13 HP Compaq 8300 Elite USDT PC B9C46AW#ABA MXL3160T53 18-Apr-13 HP Compaq 8300 Elite USDT PC B9C46AW#ABA MXL3160T54 18-Apr-13 HP Compaq 8300 Elite USDT PC B9C46AW#ABA MXL3160T55 18-Apr-13 HP Compaq 8300 Elite USDT PC B9C46AW#ABA MXL3160T5D 18-Apr-13 HP Compaq 8300 Elite USDT PC B9C46AW#ABA MXL3160T5F 18-Apr-13 HP Compaq 8300 Elite USDT PC B9C46AW#ABA MXL3160T5H 18-Apr-13 HP Compaq 8300 Elite USDT PC B9C46AW#ABA MXL3160T5L 18-Apr-13 HP Compaq 8300 Elite USDT PC B9C46AW#ABA MXL3160T5N 18-Apr-13 HP Compaq 8300 Elite USDT PC QV997AV MXL3290GJM 18-Jul-13 HP Compaq 8300 Elite USDT PC QV997AV MXL3290GJN 18-Jul-13 HP Compaq 8300 Elite USDT PC QV997AV MXL3331P0G 19-Aug-13 4.5.a Packet Pg. 112 Attachment: Surplus_20171201 (Surplus City Computers) HP Compaq 8300 Elite USDT PC QV997AV MXL3340F69 22-Aug-13 HP Compaq 8300 Elite USDT PC QV997AV MXL3431F21 25-Oct-13 HP Compaq 8300 Elite USDT PC QV997AV MXL3431F23 25-Oct-13 HP Compaq Business Desktop dc5800 AJ408AV MXL81917QW 17-May-08 4.5.a Packet Pg. 113 Attachment: Surplus_20171201 (Surplus City Computers) City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 02/6/2018 Confirmation of Soikowski Appointment to a Board or Commission Staff Lead: Frances Chapin Department: Mayor's Office Preparer: Carolyn LaFave Background/History Position #5 (Performing) on the Arts Commission is currently open due to a retirement. The Arts Commission interviewed 6 candidates and recommended Rhonda Soikowski to Mayor Earling as the best candidate. Staff Recommendation Recommending confirmation of the appointment of Rhonda Soikowski to Arts Commission Position #5 (Performing). Narrative With her professional background in performing arts, the Arts Commission and Mayor Earling feel Rhonda will provide valuable input and knowledge to the Arts Commission work. 4.6 Packet Pg. 114 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 02/6/2018 Confirmation of Oneill Appointment to a Board or Commission Staff Lead: Frances Chapin Department: Mayor's Office Preparer: Carolyn LaFave Background/History Position #4 (General) on the Arts Commission is currently open due to a retirement. The Arts Commission interviewed 6 candidates and recommended Patricia Oneill to Mayor Earling as the best candidate. Staff Recommendation Recommending confirmation of the appointment of Patricia Oneill to Arts Commission Position #4 (General). Narrative With her strong background in film arts and literature, the Arts Commission and Mayor Earling feel Patricia will provide valuable input and knowledge to the Arts Commission work. 4.7 Packet Pg. 115 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 02/6/2018 Authorization for Mayor to approve recording of a 10-foot street dedication adjacent to 720 13th Way SW (PPP committee referral) Staff Lead: Rob English Department: Engineering Preparer: Megan Luttrell Background/History On January 23, 2018, staff presented this item to the Parks, Planning and Public Works committee and it was forwarded to the February 6th consent agenda for approval. Staff Recommendation Authorize Mayor to approve recording of a 10-foot street dedication adjacent to 720 13th Way SW. Narrative The City received an application for a five-lot plat on June 23, 2017. During review of the application and associated documents, it appeared as though the right-of-way width of 13th Way SW was sufficient for the required street improvements and no further street dedication would be required. A staff report was compiled with a recommendation to the Hearing Examiner to approve the proposed plat without a street dedication. Following the hearing, however, it was discovered that the right-of-way width of 13th Way SW, adjacent to the subject property, was not as wide as shown in the original survey. The applicant inquired with their surveyor who confirmed that a 10-foot street dedication would be required to match the width originally shown in their survey and provide enough right-of-way for the required street improvements. Attachment 2 is the revised plan showing the 10-foot street dedication for the short plat. Attachments: Attachment 1 - Vicinity Map Attachment 2 - Survey 4.8 Packet Pg. 116 © City of Edmonds THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION WGS_1984_Web_Mercator_Auxiliary_Sphere Feet Notes Legend This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is for reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accurate, current, or otherwise reliable. 376.170 1:9,028 720 13th Way SW - Vicinity Map 752.3 4.8.a Packet Pg. 117 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Vicinity Map (Jenkins Lane Street Dedication) 4.8.b Packet Pg. 118 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Survey (Jenkins Lane Street Dedication) City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 02/6/2018 Authorization for Mayor to sign an Interlocal Agreement with City of Mukilteo to provide installation of slurry seals on various streets within the City of Edmonds (PPP committee referral) Staff Lead: Rob English Department: Engineering Preparer: Megan Luttrell Background/History On January 23, 2018, staff presented this item to the Parks, Planning and Public Works committee and it was forwarded to the February 6th consent agenda for approval. Staff Recommendation Authorize Mayor to sign the Interlocal Agreement with City of Mukilteo. Narrative As part of ongoing efforts to manage the City of Edmonds’ road infrastructure, the City wishes to engage in a pilot program that will test the effectiveness of slurry seal. Slurry seal is a mixture of water, asphalt, and aggregate that is applied over an existing asphalt surface to extend its life. The City of Mukilteo is currently in design process for construction of slurry seals on various streets. The City of Edmonds plans to enter a partnership with the City of Mukilteo so Edmonds can install slurry seals as part of Mukilteo’s project. By teaming up and issuing one large contract rather than two smaller contracts, the two Cities can take advantage of economy of scale to get better prices for their slurry seal programs. The proposed Interlocal Agreement will establish a cooperative relationship between the City of Mukilteo and the City of Edmonds in order for both parties to save costs. Attachments: Interlocal Agreement 4.9 Packet Pg. 119 INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT CITY OF EDMONDS AND CITY OF MUKILTEO 2018 SLURRY SEAL PROJECT THIS INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) is entered into by and between the City of Edmonds, Washington (“Edmonds”) and the City of Mukilteo, Washington (“Mukilteo”) (collectively, the “Parties”) as of the date entered below. WHEREAS, Chapter 39.34 RCW authorizes two or more political subdivisions or units of local government of the State of Washington to cooperate on a basis of mutual advantage to provide for services and facilities; and WHEREAS, Mukilteo is currently planning a capital improvement project known as the 2018 Slurry Seal Project (the “Project”); and WHEREAS, Mukilteo plans to install slurry seal on various streets as part of the Project; and WHEREAS, Edmonds wishes to incorporate the use of slurry seal into its 2018 pavement preservation program; and WHEREAS, combining both cities’ slurry seal installations into one construction contract can create a mutual cost benefit by taking advantage of economy of scale; and WHEREAS, the Parties desire to enter into this Agreement for the purpose of defining their respective rights, obligations, costs and liabilities regarding this undertaking; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Edmonds has taken appropriate action to approve Edmonds’ entry into this Agreement; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Mukilteo has taken appropriate action to approve Mukilteo’s entry into this Agreement; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the terms, conditions and covenants contained herein, Edmonds and Mukilteo agree as follows: 4.9.a Packet Pg. 120 Attachment: Interlocal Agreement (ILA with Mukilteo for Slurry Seals) TERMS Section 1. Purpose. The purpose of this Agreement is to establish a formal arrangement under which Edmonds will pay Mukilteo to incorporate slurry seal work on various Edmonds streets into the Project and to construct said work in conjunction with Mukilteo’s construction of the Project. The terms, conditions and covenants of this Agreement shall accordingly be interpreted to advance this purpose. This Agreement further seeks to allocate and define the Parties’ respective rights, obligations, costs and liabilities concerning the establishment, operation and maintenance of this undertaking. Section 2. Term. This Agreement shall be effective upon filing with the Snohomish County Auditor in accordance with Section 14. Unless terminated in accordance with Section 3, this Agreement shall remain effective until the sooner of the following events: (a) Edmonds’ written acceptance of and payment for Mukilteo’s slurry seal work provided to Edmonds pursuant to this Agreement, or (b) December 31, 2018, when it shall expire automatically. The Parties may at their option renew this Agreement for a mutually agreed upon term by a writing signed by both Parties. Section 3. Termination. Either Party may terminate this Agreement with or without cause by providing the other Party with thirty (30) days’ written notice of its intent to terminate. Termination or expiration shall not alter Edmonds’ payment obligations under Section 6 for services already rendered, as well as for the normal and reasonable costs incurred by the contractor in terminating and closing out Edmonds’ portion of the work, and shall not alter the Parties’ respective obligations under Section 9 of this Agreement. Section 4. Obligations of Edmonds. Edmonds agrees to: A. Reimburse Mukilteo for all actual costs related to the slurry seal in accordance with the terms of Section 6 of this Agreement. B. Reimburse Mukilteo for Edmonds’ share of Mukilteo’s actual costs for design, construction engineering, inspection and management of the Project work. Edmonds’ share of Mukilteo’s actual costs shall be prorated based on Edmonds’ share of the total construction costs for the work. Edmonds’ share of Mukilteo’s actual costs for construction engineering and management shall not exceed $20,000.00 without prior approval by Edmonds, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. C. Respond promptly to information requests submitted by Mukilteo or its agents regarding the Project work. D. Provide written acceptance of the work to Mukilteo upon satisfactory completion of the Project work. Section 5. Obligations of Mukilteo. Mukilteo agrees to: A. Incorporate the streets identified by Edmonds into Project documents. B. Submit to Edmonds written invoices for payment in accordance with Section 6. Include copies of invoices or other documentation from consultants and/or contractors clearly indicating Edmonds’ portion of the invoices. C. Provide Edmonds personnel reasonable access to the Project’s construction area for purposes of inspecting and monitoring the progress of the work. D. Respond promptly to information requests submitted by Edmonds or its agents regarding the Project work. 4.9.a Packet Pg. 121 Attachment: Interlocal Agreement (ILA with Mukilteo for Slurry Seals) Section 13. Notices. Notices to Mukilteo shall be sent to the following address: Section 6. Payment Schedule. The Parties agree to the following billing and payment schedule: A. For design costs, construction contract costs, and for construction engineering and management costs incurred by Mukilteo for Edmonds’ work, Mukilteo shall within thirty (30) days submit an invoice to Edmonds for its share of said expenses. B. A fifteen percent (15%) administrative overhead charge shall be included to each billing to cover administrative costs incurred by Mukilteo in administering the Project. C. Within thirty (30) days of receiving any invoice pursuant to subsection 6.A, Edmonds shall tender payment to Mukilteo in the form of a check, money order or other certified funds for the invoiced amount for work approved by Edmonds, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. D. In the event that the Parties disagree regarding Edmonds’ share of any expense incurred by Mukilteo regarding the Project, the Parties may agree to submit the question for resolution by a mediator or arbitrator acceptable to both Parties. Section 7. Ownership and Disposition of Property. The Project work done for Edmonds pursuant to this Agreement shall become and remain the exclusive property of Edmonds upon completion. All other work constructed under the Project shall become and remain the exclusive property of Mukilteo upon completion. Section 8. Administration. No Separate Entity Created. The Assistant City Engineer for Mukilteo shall serve as the administrator of this Agreement. No separate legal entity is formed by this Agreement. Section 9. Release, Indemnification and Hold Harmless Agreement. Each Party to this Agreement shall be responsible for its own negligent and/or wrongful acts or omissions, and those of its own agents, employees, representatives, contractors or subcontractors, to the fullest extent required by the laws of the State of Washington. Each Party agrees to protect, indemnify and save the other Party harmless from and against any and all such liability for injury or damage to the other Party or the other Party’s property, and also from and against all claims, demands and causes of action of every kind and character arising directly or indirectly, or in any way incident to, in connection with, or arising out of work performed under the terms hereof, caused by its own fault or that of its agents, employees, representatives, contractors or subcontractors. Mukilteo specifically promises to indemnify Edmonds against claims or suits brought under Title 51 RCW by its own employees, contractors or subcontractors, and waives any immunity that Mukilteo may have under that title with respect to, but only to, the limited extent necessary to indemnify Edmonds. Section 10. Governing Law and Venue. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Washington. Any action arising out of this Agreement shall be brought in Snohomish County Superior Court. Section 11. No Employment Relationship Created. The Parties agree that nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to create an employment relationship between Edmonds and any employee, agent, representative or contractor of Mukilteo, or between Mukilteo and any employee, agent, representative or contractor of Edmonds. Section 12. No Third Party Rights. This Agreement is intended for the sole and exclusive benefit of the Parties hereto and no third party rights are created by this Agreement. 4.9.a Packet Pg. 122 Attachment: Interlocal Agreement (ILA with Mukilteo for Slurry Seals) City of Edmonds, Office of the City Attorney City of Mukilteo, Office of the City Attorney City of Mukilteo Assistant City Engineer 11930 Cyrus Way Mukilteo, WA 98275 Notices to Edmonds shall be sent to the following address: City of Edmonds City Engineer 121 Fifth Avenue N Edmonds, WA 98020 Section 14. Duty to File Agreement with County Auditor. Mukilteo shall, after this Agreement is executed by both Parties, file this Agreement with the Snohomish County Auditor. Section 15. Integration. This document constitutes the entire embodiment of the Agreement between the Parties and, unless modified in writing by an amendment to this Interlocal Agreement signed by the Parties hereto, shall be implemented as described above. Section 16. Non-Waiver. Waiver by any Party of any of the provisions contained within this Agreement, including but not limited to any performance deadline, shall not be construed as a waiver of any other provision. DATED this day of , 2018. CITY OF EDMONDS CITY OF MUKILTEO By: By: DAVID O. EARLING Date JENNIFER GREGERSON Date Mayor Mayor ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: Scott Passey, City Clerk Janet Keefe, City Clerk Approved as to form only: Approved as to form only: 4.9.a Packet Pg. 123 Attachment: Interlocal Agreement (ILA with Mukilteo for Slurry Seals) City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 02/6/2018 Authorization for Mayor to sign a Supplemental Agreement with Tetra Tech for Alternative Refinement for the Lift Station #1 Basin and Flow Study (PPP committee referral) Staff Lead: Rob English Department: Engineering Preparer: Megan Luttrell Background/History On May 5, 2015, Council authorized the Mayor to sign the Professional Services Agreement with Tetra Tech to provide services for the Lift Station #1 Basin and Flow Study. On May 16, 2017, Council authorized the Mayor to sign Supplemental Agreement #1 for additional geotechnical work to better understand underground soil conditions and groundwater levels and refine possible alternatives. On January 23, 2018, staff presented this item to the Parks, Planning and Public Works committee and it was forwarded to the February 6th consent agenda for approval. Staff Recommendation Forward this item to the consent agenda for approval at the February 6th Council meeting. Narrative Lift Station #1 is the City’s largest sewer lift station and serves over 25% of the City’s sewer service area. The lift station was originally built in 1957 and was upgraded in 2002. The lift station is located in City right of way north of the Edmonds ferry terminal. Effluent from the lift station is pumped to a gravity sewer main that flows to Edmonds’ Wastewater Treatment Plant. The plant is located in Edmonds at 200 2nd Ave South. As part of the original scope, Tetra Tech is providing a basin analysis and flow study of Lift Station #1. The analysis will determine: · If load/flows directed to the lift station can be reduced; · If an increase in wet well storage is possible; · If modifications to the existing Sanitary Sewer overflow and associated tie in to the storm system pipe basin are needed, including assessing the outfall in Puget Sound; · The viability/location of a scalping lift station; · The benefit/possibility of installing/replacing sewer mains so that a larger portion of this basin drains by gravity directly to the treatment plant; · Schematic level design and construction costs for each alternative. Amendment #1 added the following tasks: · Geotechnical investigation services to determine: o Soil types along the project alignment o Determine groundwater levels 4.10 Packet Pg. 124 o Recommended project alternatives based on geotechnical boring results o If a gravity pipe option that would drain the entire basin using newer boring technologies is viable Based on all the current available research and data so far, the two leading alternatives are #2 and #8. One of these alternatives would involve re-construction of the current pump station adding more storage and better back-up systems. The other alternative is an all-gravity conveyance system. Each alternative carries very different risk factors, different construction challenges, and different long term maintenance costs with associated easement acquisition. Supplement #2 will provide a more in depth evaluation and breakdown of the risks for the two leading alternatives, develop schematic (10%) alignment drawings and provide the associated costs. With this additional data a more informed decision can be made to select a preferred alternative. Staff and consultant have agreed upon a scope of services for Supplement #2. The total cost of Supplement #2 is $45,099. Attachments: Tetra Tech Supplemental Agreement 4.10 Packet Pg. 125 Original Contract No. Supplemental Agreement 2 No. CITY OF EDMONDS 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH · EDMONDS, WA 98020 · 425-771-0220 · FAX 425-672-5750 Website: www.edmondswa.gov PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Engineering Division DAVE EARLING MAYOR SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT 2 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT Lift Station #1 Basin and Flow Study WHEREAS, the City of Edmonds, Washington, hereinafter referred to as the “City”, and Tetra Tech, Inc., hereinafter referred to as the “Consultant”, entered into an underlying agreement for construction claim analysis and project advisement services, dated May 7, 2015 and amended on May 23, 2017: and WHEREAS, additional tasks to the original Scope of Work have been to provide and in depth evaluation and breakdown of the leading alternatives, flesh out schematic alignment drawings and provide the associates costs; NOW, THEREFORE, In consideration of mutual benefits occurring, it is agreed by and between the parties thereto as follows: 1. The underlying Agreement of May 7, 2015 between the parties, as amended by Supplemental Agreement No. 1 dated May 23, 2017 incorporated by this reference as fully as if herein set forth, is amended in, but only in, the following respects: 1.1 Scope of Work. The Scope of Work set forth in the underlying agreement and Supplemental Agreement No. 1 is hereby further amended to include the additional services and material necessary to accomplish the stated objectives as outlined in the attached Exhibit A incorporated by this reference as fully as if herein set forth. 1.2 The $173,702 amount set forth in paragraph 2A of the underlying Agreement and stated as an amount which shall not be exceeded, and which was increased by $49,880 by Supplemental Agreement No. 1, is hereby amended to include an additional not to exceed amount of $45,099 for the additional scope of work identified in Exhibit A to this supplemental agreement. As a result of this supplemental agreement, the total contract amount is increased to a new total not-to-exceed amount of $268,681 ($173,702, plus $49,880, plus $45,099). 1.3 Exhibit B to the underlying agreement, as amended by Supplemental Agreement No. 1, consisting of the rate and cost reimbursement schedule is hereby further amended to include the form set forth on the attached Exhibit B to this Supplemental Agreement No. 2, incorporated by this reference as fully as if herein set forth. 2. In all other respects, the underlying agreement between the parties shall remain in full force and effect, amended as set forth in Supplemental Agreement Nos. 1 and 2, but only as set forth therein. 4.10.a Packet Pg. 126 Attachment: Tetra Tech Supplemental Agreement (Lift Station No. 1 Basin & Flow Study Supp. with Tetra Tech) DONE this day of , 20 . CITY OF EDMONDS TETRA TECH, INC. By: By: Mayor David O. Earling Title: ATTEST/AUTHENTICATE: ________________________________ Scott Passey, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Office of the City Attorney 4.10.a Packet Pg. 127 Attachment: Tetra Tech Supplemental Agreement (Lift Station No. 1 Basin & Flow Study Supp. with Tetra Tech) STATE OF WASHINGTON ) )ss COUNTY OF ) On this day of , 20____, before me, the under-signed, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared , to me known to be the of the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he/she was authorized to execute said instrument and that the seal affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year first above written. NOTARY PUBLIC My commission expires: 4.10.a Packet Pg. 128 Attachment: Tetra Tech Supplemental Agreement (Lift Station No. 1 Basin & Flow Study Supp. with Tetra Tech) 1/18/2018 1 Exhibit A Scope of Work Exhibit A City of Edmonds Lift Station #1 Basin and Flow Study Amendment 2 – Alternative Refinement SCOPE OF WORK January 18, 2018 Project Overview This amendment includes work to refine and clarify two final alternatives which this project identified to correct deficiencies at Edmonds’ Lift Station No. 1 and the upstream sewer basin. The alternatives have very different scopes of work, costs and risks, and this work is needed to help the City select an alternative for implementation. One final alternative, Alternative 2 – Upgrade Lift Station No.1, requires the City to substantially upgrade the lift station to meet current state and federal standards, continue to operate and maintain the lift station, accept risk of sewage overflows to Edmonds’ Underwater Park, and accept risk of sewage backing up into low lying homes if the lift station fails. The other final alternative, Alternative 8 – Sunset Ave. Interceptor, completely eliminates Lift Station No. 1 and eliminates the risk of sewage overflows and backups by installing a new gravity sewer tunnel sewer under Sunset Ave. Alternative 8 is attractive because it would eliminate the risk of sewage overflows, and because current cost estimates indicate it has 50-year life cycle costs comparable to Alternative 2. However, Alternative 8 has a much higher risk of extra costs because of potential problems that could occur during tunneling/trenchless pipe construction under Sunset Avenue. The scope of work of this amendment is described below. Task 1 - Project Management Task 1 includes the effort required to manage the project. This task includes monitoring budgets, preparing and reviewing invoices. Task 1 - Assumptions: 1. NA Task 1 - Deliverables: 1. None 4.10.a Packet Pg. 129 Attachment: Tetra Tech Supplemental Agreement (Lift Station No. 1 Basin & Flow Study Supp. with Tetra Tech) SCOPE OF WORK – LIFT STATION #1 BASIN & FLOW STUDY AMENDMENT 1 1/18/2018 2 Exhibit A Scope of Work Task 5 – Alternative Analysis The subtasks below will supplement existing Task 5 work. These subtasks will refine the scope and cost estimates and clarify risks associated with two final alternatives: Alternative 2 Upgrade Lift Station No.1 and Alternative 8 – Sunset Avenue Interceptor. These subtasks will not refine or update Alternatives 1a, 1b, 1c, 1d, 1e, 2a, 2b, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7a, 7b or 8 (micro-tunneling). For reference, Alternative 2a includes an above grade diesel standby pump at Lift Station No. 1, Alternative 2b includes a second electrically powered lift station identical to existing Lift Station No. 1. Subtask 5.4 – Refine Alternative 2 - Upgrade Lift Station No.1 Tetra Tech will refine the scope and cost estimates and clarify risks for Alternative 2 – Upgrade Lift Station No. 1 as follows.  Update cost estimates for Alternatives 2 and 2c and adjust to 2018 costs based on the ENR construction cost index. Alternative 2 is the base alternative to meet current state and federal requirements and increase capacity. Alternative 2c adds a diesel powered pump in a below grade vault at the corner of Sunset Ave and Casper’s St to further improve lift station reliability.  Estimate land area requirements and costs for easements on private property to relocate existing utilities east of the existing lift station, as needed for construction of the proposed new wet well and other lift station improvements in the Sunset Ave. right-of way.  Refine utility relocation requirements and costs.  Estimate capital, O&M and life cycle costs for adding grinder pumps at low lying homes that could be flooded with sewage if Lift Station No. 1 fails and the existing overflow path to Puget Sound is eliminated by regulatory requirements.  Estimate capital, O&M and life cycle costs for new Alternative 2d to completely replace Lift Station No.1 with new facilities, instead of remodeling existing facilities, to bracket the upper range of potential construction costs for upgrading the pump station. Subtask 5.4 - Assumptions:  Utility relocation costs will be based on existing utility information from the City.  The cost for completely replacing Lift Station No. 1 will be based on providing a wet well/dry well lift station with 2 duty pumps+1 standby pump similar to the proposed lift station remodel. The new lift station will be located just north of existing Lift Station No. 1 in the Sunset Ave. right-of-way and new easements on private property east of Sunset Ave. Subtask 5.4- Deliverables:  Technical memorandum in Subtask 5.6. Subtask 5.5 – Refine Alternative 8 – Sunset Avenue Interceptor Tetra Tech and Staheli Trenchless Consultants (working as a subconsultant to Tetra Tech), will refine the scope and cost estimates and clarify risks for Alternative 8 – Sunset Avenue Interceptor as follows. 4.10.a Packet Pg. 130 Attachment: Tetra Tech Supplemental Agreement (Lift Station No. 1 Basin & Flow Study Supp. with Tetra Tech) SCOPE OF WORK – LIFT STATION #1 BASIN & FLOW STUDY AMENDMENT 1 1/18/2018 3 Exhibit A Scope of Work  Staheli Trenchless Consultants (STC) will prepare an independent analysis of the feasibility, risks and costs of the trenchless pipeline portion of Alternative 8 as described in their scope of work in Exhibit C.  Update cost estimates and adjust to current 2018 costs. Costs for trenchless pipelines will be updated based on the cost estimates in the STC feasibility memorandum, and costs for non- trenchless facilities will be adjusted based on the ENR construction cost index.  Refine utility relocation requirements and costs. Subtask 5.5 - Assumptions: 1. Pipeline is within public right-of-way and City owned property, and there are no easements and land acquisitions required for Alternative 8. 2. Utility relocation costs near Main Street and the ferry terminal will not be included in Alternative 8 costs, because these utilities will be relocated as part of a different City project. 3. Utility relocation costs will be based on existing utility information from the City. Subtasks 5.5 Deliverables: 1. Feasibility report by Staheli Trenchless Consultants, approximately 5 pages plus appendices. 2. Technical memorandum in Subtask 5.6. Subtask 5.6 – Technical Memorandum Tetra Tech will prepare a technical memorandum summarizing the supplemental alternatives analysis including updated alternative descriptions, cost estimates, and comparison ranking of alternatives. Subtask 5.6 - Assumptions: 1. Technical memorandum will be issued as draft only. Information will be finalized in Task 6 predesign report. Subtasks 5.6 Deliverables: 1. Technical memorandum. Subtask 5.7 – Alternative Refinement Meeting Tetra Tech and Staheli Trenchless Consultants will meet with the City to review the results of the alternative refinement analyses and assist the City with selecting a recommended alternative.  Prepare and present power point presentation which summarizes the results from the alternative refinement work to assist the City with selecting a recommended alternative.  Prepare meeting minutes with action items for proceeding with Task 6 of the project. Subtask 5.6 - Assumptions: 2. Meeting will be up to 2 hours long at City offices, attended by 3 Tt staff and Kim Staheli. Subtasks 5.6 Deliverables: 2. Power Point presentation for meeting. 4.10.a Packet Pg. 131 Attachment: Tetra Tech Supplemental Agreement (Lift Station No. 1 Basin & Flow Study Supp. with Tetra Tech) SCOPE OF WORK – LIFT STATION #1 BASIN & FLOW STUDY AMENDMENT 1 1/18/2018 4 Exhibit A Scope of Work 3. Meeting minutes with action items for proceeding with Task 6 of the project. Task 6 – Recommended Alternative and Report The subtask below will supplement the original scope of work for Task 6 which included preparation of the following items. 1. 10% Design Submittal 2. Probable Construction Cost Estimate 3. Implementation Schedule 4. Permit Identification 5. Predesign Report – draft and final. Subtask 6.2– Additional Alternatives & Report This subtask provides additional budget needed to complete Task 6, recognizing that additional alternatives were developed as requested by the City (2a, 2b, 2c, 7a, 7b and 8) after the Task 5 alternatives analysis was complete in July 2016, and that these added alternatives must now be presented in the report and that additional coordination with the City is required regarding these alternatives, Task 6 Assumptions:  Ten percent design submittal will consist of up to 7 preliminary design drawings for the preferred alternative.  Anticipated preliminary design drawings for Alternative 8 include: o One (1) Aerial plan with pipe alignment shown from Brookmere Drive to the Edmonds Wastewater Treatment Plant. o Four (4) plan and profile drawings from Brookmere Drive to the Edmonds Wastewater Treatment Plant (scale 1”=100’ on 11”x17” sht).  Anticipated preliminary design drawings for Alternative 2 include: o One (1) Aerial plan with pipe alignment and lift station facilities shown from Brookmere Drive to the Edmonds Wastewater Treatment Plant. o Three (3) Plan and profile drawings from Brookmere Drive to Edmonds St and from Main St to James St (scale 1”=100’ on 11”x17” sht). o One (1) Site plan for LS#1, standby generator/ & diesel pump (scale 1”=10’ on 11”x17” sht) o One (1) Plan and elevation views for LS#1 (scale ¼” =1’ on 11”x17” sht) o One (1) Plan elevation views for standby Generator & diesel pump (scale ¼”=1’ on 11”x17” sht)  Base mapping and drawings will come from available survey mapping. Task 6 Deliverables:  Draft Predesign Report, including preliminary design drawings, cost estimate, implementation schedule, and permit identification.  Final Predesign Report 4.10.a Packet Pg. 132 Attachment: Tetra Tech Supplemental Agreement (Lift Station No. 1 Basin & Flow Study Supp. with Tetra Tech) 5405 196th Street SW Lynnwood, WA 98036 Phone: 425-205-4930 www.StaheliTrenchless.com December 27, 2017 Jim Santroch, P.E. Director, Senior Project Manager Doug Genzlinger, P.E. Project Engineer Tetra Tech, Inc. Re: City of Edmonds Trenchless Evaluation Dear Jim: It was a pleasure talking to you about the proposed trenchless pipeline work on Lift Station #1 for the City of Edmonds. Having lived in Edmonds for years now, I am quite familiar with the project area and the geotechnical conditions at the site. In accordance with our discussions, Staheli Trenchless Consultants is pleased to offer this scope of services to provide an independent analysis of feasible trenchless installation methods for the pipeline. The feasibility analysis will include evaluation of the site-specific geotechnical and groundwater information to determine trenchless installation methods that provide the technical capabilities to install the pipeline within the project goals (such as line and grade tolerance, settlement tolerance, etc. as provided by Tetra Tech). Each technically feasible trenchless method will be described and the advantages/disadvantages will be discussed as they pertain to the site and geotechnical conditions on the Lift Station #1 project. Cost estimates will be developed for each of the trenchless methods and will be compared with previous estimates prepared by Tetra Tech to allow the most up-to-date information to be included into the base cost estimate for the trenchless portion of the project. A trenchless risk analysis will be performed for each of the feasible methods identified in the study. The risk analysis will identify general trenchless risks along with risks that are specific to each of the feasible methods. The occurrence probability for each risk will be discussed to determine a relative risk factor. Mitigation measures will be identified for each risk, should they occur during construction and costs will be established for each of the risk mitigation options. This material will be summarized in a table that allows the assignment of a weighted risk/cost for each of the feasible trenchless methods, allowing the City of Edmonds to clearly understand the risk exposure of each method and allowing them to choose a construction strategy that fits within their level of risk tolerance. Attached is a fee estimate based on the scope of work outlined in this letter. If you have any questions or would like to adjust the scope of services provided in this proposal, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you for this opportunity. Sincerely, Kimberlie Staheli, Ph.D., P.E. President, Staheli Trenchless Consultants, Inc. 4.10.a Packet Pg. 133 Attachment: Tetra Tech Supplemental Agreement (Lift Station No. 1 Basin & Flow Study Supp. with Tetra Tech) Page 2 of 2 Fee Estimate for: Principal Project Admin Project ManagementCoordination 2Contract Management and Invoicing 1 3 Trenchless Engineering Predesign and Pipeline Alignment Study Services Task 1 - Review project background information, e.g., geotech, alignment, etc.2 4 Task 2 - Preliminary Trenchless Alignment and Analysis 4 2 Task 3 - Trenchless Construction Methods Preliminary Feasibility Analysis 2 Task 4 - Trenchless risk analysis 3 5 Task 5 -Trenchless Cost Estimate 2 2Task 6 - Deliverable: Technical Memorandum Summary of Tasks 1 - 4 4 8 2Task 7 - Meetings with Client/Preparation and Presentation of Findings 4 PROJECT TOTALS 24 21 3Hourly Rates 225.00$ 185.00$ 90.00$ Total Billings 5,400.00$ 3,885.00$ 270.00$ STC Subtotal 9,555.00$ Other Direct Cost's (ODC's)(Estimated at 3%)286.65$ 9,841.65$ Total Budget City of Edmonds Trenchless Feasibility Study Principal Engineer Project Engineer Admin. Assistant 5405 196th Street SWLynnwood, WA 98036Phone: 425.205.4930 Fax: 425.205.4931www.stahelitrenchless.com 4.10.a Packet Pg. 134 Attachment: Tetra Tech Supplemental Agreement (Lift Station No. 1 Basin & Flow Study Supp. with Tetra Tech) Price Summary / Totals Task Pricing Totals 45,099 Bill Rate >213.27 186.90 209.70 156.75 124.02 130.11 102.30 81.90 Specify Add'l Fees on Setup 0 Technology Use Fee Proj Area >45,099 Submitted to: City of Edmonds (Attn: Mike DeLilla) Unit Rate >$0.72 Contract Type: T&M Unit >mile Charged to >M&E Project Phases / Tasks From Thru Months 198 42 27 25 86 10 - - 8 Quantities >40 0.00%34,529 9,842 - 29 699 45,099 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Task 1 Project Management 14 2 4 - - - - - 8 - 1,829 - - - 50 1,879 PM 14 2 4 - - 8 1,829 50 1,879 Task 5 Alternative Analysis 123 22 14 15 68 4 - - - 40 21,609 9,842 - 29 435 31,915 5.4 Refine Alternative 2 54 11 3 - 40 - - - - - 9,177 - - - 191 9,368 Update costs to 2018 - Alt 2 base & Alt 2c w/ diesel pump 12 2 2 8 - - 2,054 42 2,097 Estimate land costs 10 2 8 - - 1,681 35 1,716 Refine utility relocation costs 10 1 1 8 - - 1,654 35 1,690 Estimate grinder pump costs 10 2 8 - - 1,681 35 1,716 Estimate Alt 2d new pump station 12 4 8 - - 2,107 42 2,150 5.5 Refine Alternative 8 22 3 2 5 12 - - - - - 3,943 9,842 - - 78 13,863 STC independent review of trenchless alternative 5 1 2 2 - - 1,006 9,842 18 10,866 Update costs to 2018 - Alt 8 open face tunnel 10 1 1 8 - - 1,677 35 1,712 Refine utility relocation costs 7 1 2 4 - - 1,260 25 1,284 5.6 Technical memorandum 24 2 2 4 12 4 - - - - 4,016 - - - 85 4,101 Technical Memorandum 24 2 2 4 12 4 - - 4,016 85 4,101 5.7 Alternative refinement meeting 23 6 7 6 4 - - - - 40 4,473 - - 29 81 4,583 Prepare power point presentation 8 1 2 1 4 - - 1,424 28 1,452 Attend meeting 12 4 4 4 - - 40 2,439 29 42 2,511 Action item minutes 3 1 1 1 - - 610 11 620 Task 6 Recommended Alternative and Report 61 18 9 10 18 6 - - - - 11,090 - - - 214 11,304 6.2 Additional Alternatives & Report 61 18 9 10 18 6 - - - - 11,090 - - - 214 11,304 Additional coordination 25 14 5 6 - - 5,085 87 5,172 Draft report 22 2 2 2 12 4 - - 3,597 78 3,675 Final Report 14 2 2 2 6 2 - - 2,408 50 2,458 Totals 198 42 27 25 86 10 - - 8 Quantities >40 0.00%34,529 9,842 - 29 699 45,099 Task Pricing TotalsSchedule Work Days OffWork DaysTotal Labor Hrs Subs Travel Mat'ls & Equip ODCs Labor Rate Esc.Labor Items >Fleet Vehicles Senior Project Engineer (Doug Genzlinger)Civil Engineer (Candice Au-Yeung)Editor & graphics (Dan Portman)CAD Lead (Bryan Thomasy)CAD (Richard Morris)Admin (Lisa Fortney)Geotechnical Investigations to provide information relevant to trenchless design methods.Total Price Unit Rate Qty's Pricing by Resource Project Manager (James Santroch)Project Engineer/ Deputy PM (David Scott)8 Resource Lift Station #1 - Amendment 2 - Alternative Refinement Price Proposal Labor Plan Tetra Tech - Confidential and Proprietary Page 1 of 1 Printed 1/12/2018 EXHIBIT B 4.10.a Packet Pg. 135 Attachment: Tetra Tech Supplemental Agreement (Lift Station No. 1 Basin & Flow Study Supp. with Tetra Tech) City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 02/6/2018 Employee agreement Staff Lead: Mary Ann Hardie Department: Human Resources Preparer: MaryAnn Hardie Background/History Vince Smith's employment with the City ended in January 2018. Staff is proposing this separation agreement to finalize the terms of his separation. Staff Recommendation By approving this agenda memo, the City Council would be approving the separation agreement including compensation in the amount of approximately $23,102.46 and authorizing the Mayor to execute the same. Narrative Vince Smith's employment with the City ended in January 2018. Staff is proposing this separation agreement to finalize the terms of his separation. 4.11 Packet Pg. 136 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 02/6/2018 2017 Public Defender's Annual Report Staff Lead: Mary Ann Hardie Department: Human Resources Preparer: MaryAnn Hardie Background/History The public defenders provide an annual report and presentation to Council each year. Staff Recommendation None. As required for informational purposes. Narrative The City currently contracts with the Snohomish County Public Defense Association (SCPDA) for public defense services. As part of their services, they provide an annual report to Council each year for informational purposes. Their 2017 report is attached. Attachments: Edmonds 2017 Annual Report 5.1 Packet Pg. 137 Snohomish County Public Defender Association 2722 Colby Avenue, Suite 200 • Everett, WA 98201-3527 Phone: 425-339-6300 • Fax: 425-339-6363 • www.snocopda.org This is the 2017 Annual Report of the Snohomish County Public Defender Association (SCPDA) to the City of Edmonds. Public Defender Assignments In 2017, Edmonds Municipal Court appointed SCPDA as counsel in 570 pre-trial cases, 2 appeals to Snohomish County Superior Court, and 42 probation-only cases. This is consistent with the number of referrals contemplated in the contract.1 For the year, SCPDA attorneys had initiated 118 defense investigation requests, referred 35 cases for immigration consultation services, and submitted 23 social worker requests.2 These services help improve outcomes. During the course of the year, 709 cases were closed. Included in those outcomes were 246 case dismissals, 59 criminal traffic offenses reduced to civil infractions, and 38 cases that entered into stipulated orders of continuances, a path to case dismissal.3 Sometimes a case involves more than one criminal charge. In 2017, 273 counts resolved by guilty plea as charged and 82 counts resolved by guilty plea to a reduced charge. SCPDA public defenders also provided representation at 478 probation review hearings. SCPDA conducted seven jury trials and two appeals to Snohomish County Superior Court. 1 See Exhibits 1 and 2: Offense types for the year and by quarter. 2 See Exhibit 3: Investigation requests by offense type. 3 A stipulated order of continuance is an agreed continuance of the case and if the accused meets established goals, then the case will be dismissed upon completion of the agreed term. 5.1.a Packet Pg. 138 Attachment: Edmonds 2017 Annual Report (2017 Public Defender's Annual Report) 2017 Annual Report – Page 2 Current Criminal Justice Issues SCPDA continued to evolve over the past year. With support from Edmonds Municipal Court, SCPDA public defenders and staff were granted access to print court calendars in the Judicial Information System (JIS). I testified before the Data Dissemination Committee of the Administrative Office of the Courts to petition for the change. The change reduced the burden on the court and prosecutors who no longer need to provide court calendars to us. Other improvements this year included implementing Acuity, an electronic scheduling program for client appointments which sends text reminders to clients and upgrading our On Call System. SCPDA provides after hours attorneys available to persons under arrest who request to speak to an attorney. We had lost confidence in our commercial answering service and implemented a direct dial system that eliminated the problems with the answering service. Consistent with 2016, the majority of defendants represented by a public defender in Edmonds Municipal Court are charged with crimes related to poverty: driving while license suspended third degree4, third degree theft, and possession of drug paraphernalia. These offenses account for nearly 50% of the crimes charged in Edmonds Municipal Court. One pending bill that would significantly reduce public defender costs is SB 6189/HB 2481, which proposes to de-criminalize driving while license suspended third degree. Driving while license suspended is a third degree is classified as a misdemeanor crime. A person can commit driving while license suspended third degree in one of 9 ways. The bill would reduce driving while license suspended third degree to a traffic infraction with a $250 fine. There is not a constitutional right to an attorney for a traffic infraction. If this bill passed, the City of Edmonds would not have to assign public defender services to represent defendants charged with this traffic infraction. 4 Driving while license suspended third degree is listed as DWLS 3 in the tables that follow this report. 5.1.a Packet Pg. 139 Attachment: Edmonds 2017 Annual Report (2017 Public Defender's Annual Report) 2017 Annual Report – Page 3 Options to reduce the impact of crimes of poverty and reduce criminal justice costs include creating pre-prosecution diversion programs, a re-licensing program, implementing charging and quash standards for certain offenses, enacting crime prevention policies, and/or developing community resources to assist people with homelessness, addiction, mental wellness, and poverty. These types of offenses can often be reduced through diversion programs structured to address underlying cause(s) of the criminal behavior and provide education and resources to help participants avoid contact with the system in the future. The infrastructure needed to support these programs can be much more cost effective than the criminal justice system. Snohomish County Diversion Center SCPDA has participated in the workgroup that led to the planned development of the Snohomish County Diversion Center. Snohomish County Corrections shuttered the work release program and left part of its facility vacant. Snohomish County is working with Pioneer Human Services to develop a diversion program designed to divert non-violent, low-level offenders with substance abuse and behavioral health issues from the criminal justice system and into treatment and recovery. The former work release facility has been renamed the Snohomish County Diversion Center. It is being refurbished to provide approximately 40 beds for short-term placement/shelter. In the beginning, participants will be identified by the county’s law enforcement social worker teams. Participants will be assigned a case manager to help them enroll in treatment and other social services to address individual needs. The population served may be expanded. Pioneer Humans Services will provide the primary services to include providing staff on site 24/7, medical and behavioral health screening at intake, and medical support throughout stay. Funding is being sought with HB 2287/SB 6060. Snohomish County is also developing the Carnegie Resource Center next door to the Diversion Center. The Resource Center will serve as a gateway to a multitude of resources related to mental health treatment, substance use treatment, employment services, housing enrollment, veterans’ 5.1.a Packet Pg. 140 Attachment: Edmonds 2017 Annual Report (2017 Public Defender's Annual Report) 2017 Annual Report – Page 4 programs, DSHS services, energy assistance, and obtaining an ID from the Department of Licensing. Pioneer Human Services is recruiting service providers to be a presence at the Resource Center. There is a target date to open in June 2018. Competency Diversion Program Snohomish County was awarded grant funds in 2017 to start a Competency Diversion Program (CDP). The Snohomish County Public Defender Association facilitated the grant proposal. Most of the funds are allocated to support Sunrise Services, a community based mental health treatment program, and the Snohomish County Prosecutor’s Office Therapeutic Alternative to Prosecution (TAP) to divert mentally ill defendants who have been deemed so acutely mentally ill that they are not competent to proceed to trial. For more than a decade, incompetent defendants have been underserved by the capacity limitations at Western State Hospital (WSH). The state hospital is required to provide for restoration services during a hospital stay to restore competency so that mentally ill defendants are well enough to participate in the court process.5 WSH has long been unable to manage its capacity with the number of incompetent clients. This has led to significant delays in restoration services. A federal court has ruled the delay in restoration services is a violation of constitutional rights.6 Originally, the grant funds were allocated to divert mentally ill defendants held in custody pending restoration services. This fall, the program was expanded to accept out of custody defendants as well. The goals of the program are to reduce WSH resources, reduce the number of jail days for in custody defendants, and facilitate providing community-based resources to the mentally ill caught up in the criminal justice system. The prosecutor acts as the gatekeeper to determine which participants apply for the program. Sunrise Services completes an assessment to determine mental health needs. If 5 It is estimated that 80% of restoration services is related to prescription medication needs. 6 Federal Judge Marsha Peckman ruled that restoration delays were a violation of due process in Trueblood v. DSHS. 5.1.a Packet Pg. 141 Attachment: Edmonds 2017 Annual Report (2017 Public Defender's Annual Report) 2017 Annual Report – Page 5 accepted, the criminal matter is dismissed. The participant must agree to engage with Sunrise Services and a TAP counselor for 6 months. The prosecutor retains his or her discretion and can refile the criminal matter at any time if deemed appropriate due to nonengagement or new criminal behavior. The 6-month program is individualized to meet participant needs, but can include working with a case manager, prescriber, and therapist. The participant will be provided housing, a cell phone, if needed, and have access to other Sunrise programs to assist with accessing drug and alcohol treatment, work programs, and longer-term housing solutions. CDP is open to Snohomish County municipalities. The TAP counselor can provide updates to the prosecutor over the course of the program. The overarching goal of CDP is to provide the support that mentally ill defendants need to divert them from the criminal justice system. 5.1.a Packet Pg. 142 Attachment: Edmonds 2017 Annual Report (2017 Public Defender's Annual Report) 2017 Annual Report – Page 6 Exhibit 1: Cases by Offense Type Offense Type 2017 Cases % DWLS 3RD DEGREE 159 28% THEFT/SHOPLIFTING 123 22% ALL OTHER UNLISTED MISDEMEANORS 88 15% DOMESTIC VIOLENCE - ASSAULT, RECK ENDA 76 13% DUI AND PHYSICAL CONTROL 64 11% ASSAULT (NOT DV) 46 8% CRIMINAL TRESPASS 1 OR 2 33 6% VIOLATION OF COURT ORDER/ PROTECTIVE ORDER 21 4% DWLS 1ST AND 2ND DEGREE 17 2% MALICIOUS MISCHIEF 13 2% OBSTRUCT A PUBLIC SERVANT 10 2% Alcohol related offenses (excluding DUI) 10 2% HIT & RUN ATT AND UNATT 9 2% HARASSMENT 4 <1% SIMPLE TRAFFIC OFFENSES 3 <1% RECKLESS DRIVING 2 <1% WEAPONS RELATED OFFENSES 2 <1% DISORDERLY CONDUCT 2 <1% 5.1.a Packet Pg. 143 Attachment: Edmonds 2017 Annual Report (2017 Public Defender's Annual Report) 2017 Annual Report – Page 7 Exhibit 2: Cases by Quarter and Offense Type Offense Type 1st QUARTER 2nd QUARTER 3rd QUARTER 4th QUARTER Cases % Cases % Cases % Cases % DWLS 3RD DEGREE 43 27% 39 30% 45 27% 32 20% THEFT/SHOPLIFTING 42 26% 28 22% 25 15% 28 17% ALL OTHER UNLISTED MISDEMEANORS 22 14% 11 8% 21 12% 34 21% DOMESTIC VIOLENCE - ASSAULT, RECK ENDA 16 10% 18 14% 31 18% 11 7% DUI AND PHYSICAL CONTROL 11 7% 15 12% 18 11% 20 12% CRIMINAL TRESPASS 1 OR 2 7 4% 10 8% 7 4% 9 5% ASSAULT (NOT DV) 7 4% 10 8% 7 4% 5 3% VIOLATION OF COURT ORDER/ PROTECTIVE ORDER 10 6% 2 2% 5 3% 4 2% DWLS 1ST AND 2ND DEGREE 6 4% 1 <1% 6 4% 4 2% MALICIOUS MISCHIEF 2 1% 5 4% 5 3% 1 <1% OBSTRUCT A PUBLIC SERVANT 2 1% 1 <1% 3 2% 4 2% Alcohol related offenses (excluding DUI) 0 0% 0 0% 8 4% 2 1% HIT & RUN ATT AND UNATT 0 0% 2 2% 3 2% 4 2% HARASSMENT 0 0% 1 <1% 2 1% 1 1% SIMPLE TRAFFIC OFFENSES 2 1% 0 0% 1 <1% 0 0% RECKLESS DRIVING 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 2 1% WEAPONS RELATED OFFENSES 1 1% 0 0% 1 <1% 0 0% DISORDERLY CONDUCT 0 0 0 0% 1 <1% 1 <1% 5.1.a Packet Pg. 144 Attachment: Edmonds 2017 Annual Report (2017 Public Defender's Annual Report) 2017 Annual Report – Page 8 Exhibit 3: Investigations Requests by Offense Type Offense Type Investigations DWLS 3RD DEGREE 2 THEFT/SHOPLIFTING 15 ALL OTHER UNLISTED MISDEMEANORS 7 DOMESTIC VIOLENCE - ASSAULT, RECK ENDA 30 DUI AND PHYSICAL CONTROL 14 CRIMINAL TRESPASS 1 OR 2 3 VIOLATION OF COURT ORDER/ PROTECTIVE ORDER 7 HIT & RUN ATT AND UNATT 5 SIMPLE TRAFFIC OFFENSES 1 DWLS 1ST AND 2ND DEGREE 4 OBSTRUCT A PUBLIC SERVANT 0 RECKLESS DRIVING 0 HARASSMENT 1 ASSAULT (NOT DV) 6 MALICIOUS MISCHIEF 3 WEAPONS RELATED OFFENSES 1 5.1.a Packet Pg. 145 Attachment: Edmonds 2017 Annual Report (2017 Public Defender's Annual Report) City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 02/6/2018 Snohomish County Emergency Radio System Presentation Staff Lead: Al Compaan Department: Police Services Preparer: Al Compaan Background/History The Snohomish County Emergency Radio System (SERS) was formed in 1999 and provides the infrastructure for police/fire/aid first responders throughout Snohomish County. This includes the hardware and software to operate 22 transmission towers strategically located throughout the county to process 7,000,000 transmissions annually. It is a "mission critical" voice communications system that is vital to public safety on a 24/7 basis. Staff Recommendation Presentation by SERS representatives, and subsequent consideration of Council Resolution supporting Snohomish County funding of a new emergency radio system. Narrative The present SERS system is approaching end-of-life, as the manufacturer (Motorola) has informed SERS that they will no longer support the system with replacement parts after 2020. In addition, technological advancements over the years have rendered the present system obsolete. It is necessary that the system be replaced with up-to-date hardware and software. Projected cost for such an endeavor is $75 million. There are several revenue alternatives that need to be explored to secure funds for the new system. SERS representatives will provide an overview to Edmonds City Council on the system's present status, why there is a need for replacement, and the need for the City of Edmonds to support funding alternatives. Attachments: SERS NEWS RELEASE 1-18-2018 SERS FACTS SNOCO EMERGENCY 911 RADIO SYSTEM SERS Radio System Resolution City of Edmonds 5.2 Packet Pg. 146                                                                                                             FOR  RELEASE:                    FOR  FURTHER  INFORMATION:   January  18,  2018  -­‐  1:00pm            Ralph  Krusey,  SERS  CAO        (360)  243-­‐  9649  office,  (360)  965-­‐5099  mobile   911 EMERGENCY RADIO SYSTEM FAILING AND MUST BE REPLACED Local public safety leaders from throughout Snohomish County - including police and fire chiefs as well as locally elected officials, have sent a direct request to members of Snohomish County Council and County Executive Somers asking they take “urgent action” to help replace Snohomish County’s obsolete and potentially-failing, 20-year old emergency 911 radio system. The direct and “urgent” request was made for a “countywide funding mechanism” to purchase a new radio system in a letter to county officials from Board members of SERS, the Snohomish County Emergency Radio System, a non-profit, public agency serving 50 police and fire agencies throughout the County. In the letter to County officials, Marysville Mayor Jon Nehring. SERS Board president, wrote: “Funding is needed to replace Snohomish County’s outdated, analog emergency radio system. Soon our two-way radios will no longer be supported by the manufacturer and already are at increased risk of failing. A new, digital, P25 radio system is much needed, Mayor Nehring stated. P25 is a national standard designed to enhance interoperability between radio manufactures and radio systems. “In 2020, SERS countywide 20-year old, obsolete emergency radio system reaches its projected end-of-life. Radios now used by responders from 50 police and fire agencies will no longer be serviceable. No longer supported by its manufacturer, radio replacement parts are increasingly unavailable. Resulting increased risk of emergency radio system breakdowns and failure is unacceptable and must be avoided. A funding mechanism is urgently needed to finance a replacement for Snohomish County’s current 911 emergency radio system,” Mayor Nehring said. Three years ago SERS engaged the international consulting firm, Stantec, to do a two-part, technical study analyzing the County’s future radio system needs. The consultants found the existing radio system had deteriorated with age and was in need of replacement. Stantec preliminarily estimated capital costs to replace the radio system in the $70-75 million range. 5.2.a Packet Pg. 147 Attachment: SERS NEWS RELEASE 1-18-2018 (Snohomish County Emergency Radio System) -2- Last year Snohomish County’s Purchasing Division issued a request for competitive bid proposals (RFP) to procure a new countywide radio system. Four potential bidders have expressed interest in bidding on the project and a contract will be awarded this year to a successful bidder. Counties throughout the state have already obtained voter approval of special countywide ballot propositions of funding measures to finance upgrading their similarly, obsolete emergency radio systems. Counties already taking action include: Pierce, King, Spokane, Cowlitz, Pacific, Thurston and Benton counties. Voters in each county authorized tax measures to fund multi-year projects to design, equip and install a new countywide emergency radio systems. “Snohomish County is the only local government empowered by state law to authorize countywide financial resources needed to fund a new radio system. This proposal represents the broadest possible consensus of local public safety and elected local government leaders of what needs to be done to replace our obsolete, analog system,” said SERS Board Vice Chair, Mountlake Terrace Mayor Jerry Smith. Snohomish County Sheriff Ty Trenary, stated he supports replacing the SERS radio system as soon as possible. The Sheriff cited a December 8, 2017 letter sent to the County Council from the Snohomish County Sheriff and Police Chiefs Association. “Leaders of local law enforcement agencies from throughout Snohomish County know that our first responders must have reliable and dependable radios to communicate with each other and with the County’s 911 call dispatch center. Our responders cannot effectively and safely respond to police, fire and emergency medical emergencies without reliable and dependable two-way radios,” Sheriff Trenary said. A letter from the Snohomish County Fire Chief’s Association stated: “As Fire Chiefs we will support the County taking necessary actions to authorize a dedicated, countywide, equitable funding source for Snohomish County's emergency radio system…We unanimously decided to respectfully request that our elected Snohomish County leaders take necessary actions as soon as possible to replace our county's outdated emergency radio system. Accordingly, we respectfully urge that you approve the necessary financial resources to fund a new P25 emergency radio system.” The letter was signed by Fire District 22 Chief, Travis Hots, the group’s president. XXX (Please note: attached letters from the county sheriff and police chiefs and fire chiefs associations.) 5.2.a Packet Pg. 148 Attachment: SERS NEWS RELEASE 1-18-2018 (Snohomish County Emergency Radio System) SNOHOMISH  COUNTY’S  EMERGENCY  911  RADIO  SYSTEM   FACTS 1. RADIO SYSTEM OPERATOR: SERS, Snohomish County Emergency Radio System, a non-profit public agency governed by an 11-member, local government appointed Board. 2. RADIO SYSTEM USERS: 50 local agencies: 20 law enforcement agencies, 28 fire departments. Snohomish County 911, Snohomish County Department of Emergency Management 3. RADIO SYSTEM COUNTYWIDE VOLUME: 7,000,000 transmissions annually, 19,000 daily transmissions, one million emergency 911 calls annually dispatched to responders via two-way radios 4. CURRENT RADIO SYSTEM: 19-year old, 800 MHz trunked, simulcast, Motorola analogue system 5. CONDITION OF CURRENT RADIO SYSTEM: Poor - Deteriorating, in need of replacement and about to reach its end-of-life in 2020 when Motorola no longer will support the system by providing replacement parts. 6. COUNTY RADIO COVERAGE AREA: 940 square miles = 95% coverage of county’s highly inhabited densely populated areas 7. RADIO EQUIPMENT USED IN COUNTY TODAY: 20 SERS towers transmit microwave radio signals push-to-talk (PTT) transceivers to 5,000 portable or mobile 8. PEOPLE SERVED BY 911 EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS: county population of 789,400 plus tens of thousands of daily transient visitors 9. CONDITION OF CURRENT RADIO SYSTEM: System is about to reach its end-of-life in 2020 when Motorola will no longer support the system by providing replacement parts. International consultant, STANTEC, reported in its 2016 study/evaluation of the County’s radio system: “Because the existing analogue system is old, failures and repairs will increase. Current radio system doesn’t reliably cover the county’s sprawling population growth. The existing channels will meet communication capacity needs during major, mass casualty events, such as natural disasters.” 10. NEW RADIO SYSTEM BRINGS: A new P25 digital radio system will double transmission capacity, improve sound clarity and reduce background noise, expand the radio coverage area and allow for easier replacement of digital parts and equipment component upgrades as needed. 11. ESTIMATED COST ON NEW P25 RADIO SYSTEM: Consultants at Stantec in 2016 made preliminary cost estimates in the range of $70 to $75 million. Precise costs for procuring, designing, installing the new radio system will be known after a contract is awarded and signed by the County. 12. STATUS OF COUNTY/SERS PROCUREMENT EFFORT: An RFP was issued by the Snohomish County Purchasing Division on November 17, 2017 via a competitive bidding process. The deadline for submitting proposals is February 22, 2018. The successful bidder will be chosen in March, 2018. A contract will be negotiated and executed by May, 2018. 13. COUNTY DEADLINES FOR SUBMITTING BALLOT PROPOSITIONS: (a.) 2018 Primary election = May 11, 2018 (b.) 2018 General Election = August 7, 2018 14. COUNTIES ALREADY FUNDING A NEW COUNTY P25 RADIO SYSTEM: Pierce, King, Spokane, Clark, Thurston, Benton, and Cowlitz counties 15. HISTORY OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY’S RADIO SYSTEM: SERS was formed in 1999. Initial emergency radios in the county were VHF and UHF and eventually went to 150 MHz broadband. FCC required going to 800 MHz narrowband. In 1999 SERS system was built in two phases: Phase One was completed in 2003 with 7 towers constructed (West Loop South County) Phase two was completed in 2006 6 towers were constructed (East Loop North County). SERS is committed to replacing its outdated 20-year old system with a new P25 digital countywide system that to serves the public safety communication needs of the entire County. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: Ralph Krusey - SERS CAO - rkrusey@sers800.org 360) 243-9649 - Mobile: (360) 965-5099 SERS Office: 14900 40th Ave NE #102, Marysville, WA 5.2.b Packet Pg. 149 Attachment: SERS FACTS SNOCO EMERGENCY 911 RADIO SYSTEM (Snohomish County Emergency Radio System) DRAFT CITY RESOLUTION SUPPORTING COUNTY FUNDING OF A NEW EMERGENCY RADIO SYSTEM WHEREAS, the City of Edmonds serves its 41,260 residents by providing public safety services to our community; and WHEREAS, the safety of residents living and working in our community depends on continuing to have reliable and effective emergency communications between police and fire agency first responders; and WHEREAS, SERS, the Snohomish County Emergency Radio System, has since 1999 provided a dependable and reliable 911 emergency radio service for our city’s police and firefighters enabling them to effectively respond to emergency 911 call dispatches to respond to our city’s neighborhoods; and WHEREAS, SERS has two decades of technical expertise in developing, acquiring, installing, operating, maintaining, and managing the countywide emergency radio system; and WHEREAS, the SERS existing analogue, 800 MHz radio system is now outdated and about to reach its end-of- life in 2020, compromising communications between 911 call dispatchers and first responders; and WHEREAS, independent expert analysis has determined that a new replacement P25 radio system using modern digital technology will substantially reduce risk of future failure, provide better audio voice quality for simulcast, two-way, interoperable emergency communications; and WHEREAS, other counties in our region have already taken action to fund and replace their radio systems; and WHEREAS, a county competitive bidding procurement process has begun to select a qualified vendor to provide a new, countywide P25 radio system; and WHEREAS, the preliminarily estimated cost of a new radio system now projected at $75 million exceeds the existing revenue and budget sources of most all local governments and agencies within Snohomish County; and NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Edmonds supports Snohomish County government taking necessary action in 2018 to replace the outdated SERS emergency radio system. We respectfully urge Snohomish County elected officials authorize sufficient funding resources to purchase, design and install the much needed countywide P25 digital 911 emergency radio system. As elected officials of the City of Edmonds, we are resolved to support County passage in 2018 of a measure that provides a dedicated, countywide, equitable funding source for the new, countywide emergency 911 radio system. _______________________________________ ____________________________________ Council President Council Member _______________________________________ ____________________________________ Council Member Council Member ______________________________________ ___________________________________ Council Member Council Member ______________________________________ ___________________________________ Council Member Mayor _______________________________________ ____________________________________ Date Adopted City Clerk 5.2.c Packet Pg. 150 Attachment: SERS Radio System Resolution City of Edmonds (Snohomish County Emergency Radio System) City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 02/6/2018 Study of Economic Impacts of Arts and Culture Staff Lead: Patrick Doherty Department: Economic Development Preparer: Patrick Doherty Background/History The Community Cultural Plan, first created in 1994 and facilitated by the Edmonds Arts Commission under the Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services Department, focuses on strengthening and promoting arts and culture in Edmonds. The Economic Impact of Arts & Culture study implements a key strategy called out by the community in the 2014 Cultural Plan to conduct economic assessments of cultural tourism and the impact of arts and culture in the community. Community members emphasized the importance of quantifiable data to further Edmonds’ understanding of itself as an arts community and to inform future support for this important economic sector. The City engaged BERK Consulting and AdvisArts in early 2017 to conduct the study of economic impacts, gathering information from organizations in arts and culture, and surveying participants and attendees. The goals of the study included understanding the economic impacts of attendance and participation, a general profile of arts and culture audiences/participants, and an expanded inventory of entities, both not for profit and businesses, involved in arts and culture activities. Staff Recommendation Presentation only. No action required. Narrative Study Summary Here is a brief summary of key aspects of the attached Arts and Culture Economic Impact Study. Study goals: 1. Help Edmonds better understand the impact of its arts and culture scene on the local economy, as well as the broader community 2. Provide guidance on how Edmonds can continue to enhance the arts and culture sector to increase its positive impacts Led and guided by: City Project Team · Frances Chapin, Arts & Culture Manager 5.3 Packet Pg. 151 · Patrick Doherty, Economic Development/Community Services Director · Carrie Hite, Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services Director Project Advisory Group - 13 members of Edmonds boards, commissions, businesses and arts/cultural organizations, as well as Councilmembers Mesaros and Tibbott Study Process and Inputs Study centered on three main inputs: 1. Project Advisory Group: May-December 2017. Members informed and championed the project, bolstered data collection efforts, vetted survey findings, and guided recommendation development. 2. Stakeholder Interviews: May 2017. Conversations on the economic impact of arts and culture with more than 20 key partners, business owners, policymakers, and community representatives. 3. Online Surveys · Organization and Business Survey: August-October 2017 · Community and Visitor Survey: June-October 2017 · Arts & Culture Story Collector: June-October 2017 Key Findings: · ECA and major festivals are anchor attractions · Diversity in attractions gives the Edmonds arts and culture scene strength · Edmonds arts and culture sector produces multiple benefits: o Economic impact - $50 million/year, 440 FTE, $17 million in labor income o Quality of life - People in Edmonds describe arts and culture as one of those things they need or look for in quality of life. It’s what draws them to the community and makes Edmonds an appealing place to live. o Community image and identity - Arts and culture figure into how Edmonds is seen by the world (its image) and how the community views itself (its identity). It’s what draws residents, visitors and businesses to Edmonds. · People living with 30-minute drive serve as Edmonds’ primary market for arts/culture. · Base of participants is found among people 65 and older. Recommendations: · Strengthen the arts and culture sector citywide in economic development efforts · Integrate arts and culture’s contributions to the economy in new and existing community economic development efforts · Collaborate to attract target audiences · Work across the community to develop positive visitor experiences · Market Edmonds regionally and tier marketing investments and strategies An Appendix is attached here that contains summaries of survey data, story collector information, etc. As for sharing this information, findings and recommendations with the public, the report will be posted on the city’s website and will be presented in summary form at a public open house, tentatively scheduled for March 22nd or shortly thereafter. In addition a Communications Piece for dissemination to the broader community (in the form of an 11”x17” folded, four-panel brochure) will be distributed and 5.3 Packet Pg. 152 is also attached here for your perusal. A stand-alone, two-sided sheet will also be printed that contains just the Recommendations. Attachments: Edmonds Arts and Culture 2017 Economic Impact Study 2018_0130 Appendix 2018_0130 Communication Handout 2018_0130 Recommendations Insert 2018_0130 5.3 Packet Pg. 153 City of Edmonds Arts and Culture 2017 Economic Impact Study Full Report | January 30, 2018 5.3.a Packet Pg. 154 Attachment: Edmonds Arts and Culture 2017 Economic Impact Study 2018_0130 (Study of Economic Impacts of Arts and Culture) CITY OF EDMONDS PROJECT TEAM Frances White Chapin, Arts & Culture Manager Patrick Doherty, Economic Development Director Carrie Hite, Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services Director PROJECT ADVISORY GROUP Alicia Crank, Edmonds Planning Board Ed Dorame, Edmonds Diversity Commission Lindsey Echelbarger, Cascadia Art Museum Fred Gouge, Port of Edmonds Suzy Maloney, Edmonds Arts Commission Joe McIalwain, Edmonds Center for the Arts Tom Mesaros, Edmonds City Council Mary Monroe, Edmonds Economic Development Commission Tanya Sharp, Edmonds Arts Commission Kim Smith, Edmonds Driftwood Players Pam Stuller, Edmonds Downtown Alliance Neil Tibbott, Edmonds City Council Greg Urban, Edmonds Chamber of Commerce CONSULTANT PROJECT TEAM Brian Murphy, Project Manager Claudia Bach, Strategic Advisor, AdvisArts Bryce Anderson, Analyst Jason Hennessy, Analyst Sherrie Hsu, Analyst Claire Miccio, Analyst 5.3.a Packet Pg. 155 Attachment: Edmonds Arts and Culture 2017 Economic Impact Study 2018_0130 (Study of Economic Impacts of Arts and Culture) 1 City of Edmonds Arts and Culture 2017 Economic Impact Study Full Report | January 30, 2018 Contents Background and Purpose ...................................................................................................................... 2 Study Inputs .......................................................................................................................................... 3 Project Advisory Group ............................................................................................................................................ 3 Stakeholder Interviews.............................................................................................................................................. 3 Online Surveys ............................................................................................................................................................ 3 Community Profile of Edmonds ............................................................................................................ 5 Arts and Culture Organization and Business Survey .......................................................................... 11 Arts and Culture Organizations and Businesses in Edmonds ............................................................................ 11 Organization and Business Survey Findings........................................................................................................ 13 Arts and Culture Focus and Role ....................................................................................................................... 13 Financial Snapshot ............................................................................................................................................... 15 Income of Edmonds Arts and Culture Organizations and Businesses ......................................................... 16 Expenditures of Edmonds Arts and Culture Organizations.......................................................................... 19 Capital Improvement Spending ........................................................................................................................ 19 Employment .......................................................................................................................................................... 20 Volunteers ............................................................................................................................................................. 21 Attendees, Clients, or Customers ....................................................................................................................... 21 Lodging and Travel Accommodations.............................................................................................................. 23 Community and Visitor Survey ........................................................................................................... 24 Arts and Culture’s Economic Impacts and Community Benefits .......................................................... 36 Economic Impact ....................................................................................................................................................... 36 Understanding Arts and Culture’s Economic Impact: An Example .............................................................. 39 Community Benefits .................................................................................................................................................. 40 Quality of Life ...................................................................................................................................................... 40 Community Image and Identity ......................................................................................................................... 40 Takeaways and Recommendations .................................................................................................... 41 Bibliography ........................................................................................................................................ 44 5.3.a Packet Pg. 156 Attachment: Edmonds Arts and Culture 2017 Economic Impact Study 2018_0130 (Study of Economic Impacts of Arts and Culture) City of Edmonds | Arts and Culture 2017 Economic Impact Study 2 Background and Purpose The City of Edmonds has long nurtured its network of local arts and culture organizations. Every year, Edmonds’ businesses and not-for-profits attract tens of thousands of visitors interested in experiencing the community’s creative culture and distinctive visual, performing, and literary arts. Arts and culture benefit residents as well as visitors, and over the years, local tourism emerged as a potential arena for economic growth and community enhancement. In 1994, the City of Edmonds Arts Commission, in partnership with the Edmonds Arts Festival Foundation, developed its first community cultural plan, with updates in 2001, 2008, and 2014. The 2014 Community Cultural Plan is a testament to the City’s dedication to strengthen and promote the arts in Edmonds, and provides a framework to encourage and align action across all sectors of the community. One goal of the Plan is to increase awareness of the role – both economic and social – that arts and culture play in the community. To advance this goal, the Cultural Services Division of the City of Edmonds Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services Department, working with the Arts Commission and the Economic Development Department, identified the need for a study of the economic impact of arts and culture. BERK Consulting and AdvisArts conducted this study. It is an impact assessment that analyzes and tells the story of the arts and culture sector’s economic contributions to the community and region. This study will help the Edmonds community better understand the impact its vibrant arts and culture scene has on the local economy, and on the community more broadly. The study also provides guidance on how Edmonds can continue to enhance its creative offerings and increase their positive impacts. This report has four main sections. The first section, Arts and Culture Organization and Business Survey provides an overview of the organizations that constitute the arts and culture sector in Edmonds, and presents economic and financial benefits from data submitted by businesses and organizations that participated in the survey. The second section, Community and Visitor Survey presents data from residents and visitors on arts and culture preferences, attendance patterns, and household spending on art and arts-related activities, events, and equipment – all within Edmonds. The third section, Economic Impacts and Community Benefits, presents the economic impact of the arts and culture sector to the local Edmonds economy and region, and discusses the other, significant benefits that the sector provides the community, including image, identity, and quality of life. The fourth section, Takeaways and Recommendations, presents overall findings from the data and recommendations for how the City of Edmonds, its partners, and the broader community can further enhance and better support the arts and culture sector, so that it continues to grow and provide economic benefits. 5.3.a Packet Pg. 157 Attachment: Edmonds Arts and Culture 2017 Economic Impact Study 2018_0130 (Study of Economic Impacts of Arts and Culture) City of Edmonds | Arts and Culture 2017 Economic Impact Study 3 Study Inputs PROJECT ADVISORY GROUP Over the course of two meetings, a Project Advisory Group shaped and guided the study and its resulting recommendations. As representatives of the arts and culture community, the Advisory Group was a key resource for this study. Members were charged with informing and championing the project, as well as bolstering data collection efforts to ensure the analysis could accurately tell Edmonds’ story. The first meeting in early May 2017 focused on project promotion and survey development. The second meeting in early December 2017 centered on survey findings, recommendation development, community communications, and potential next steps. STAKEHOLDER INTERVIEWS To gain insight into stakeholder perspectives on the economic impact of arts and culture, and to raise community support for the effort, BERK Consulting and the City of Edmonds conducted conversations with more than 20 key partners, business owners, policymakers, and representatives from the arts and culture community. These interviews helped shape survey tools and frame analysis. Interviews took place in City Hall on May 1, 2017. See the Appendix for the complete Stakeholder Interview Summary. ONLINE SURVEYS Online surveys were the primary tool for the data collection effort. BERK, in collaboration with the City of Edmonds and the Advisory Group, designed and administered three surveys, each with the purpose of gathering information on the arts and culture sector, and better understanding who the current and potential supporters of the arts in Edmonds are. Each survey is described briefly below and the full instruments are found in the Appendix. The Organization and Business Survey was designed to reach public, private, and not-for-profit entities in the City’s arts and culture sector. The survey was sent directly to 31 not-for-profits, two public sector entities, and 38 businesses. Promotion for the survey included emails to organizations and businesses in the City Arts and Culture Inventory (an outgrowth of the 2014 Community Cultural Plan), and encouragement from City staff, Advisory Group members, and other community volunteers. The survey collected financial data to estimate economic impact and to describe economic contributions, and asked for complementary information to update the City’s Arts and Culture Inventory. A total of 40 organizations and businesses responded to this survey (56% response rate): 23 not-for- profit organizations, 15 businesses, and two public sector entities. The Community & Visitor Survey informs the discussion of arts and culture contributions to the local Advisory Group Members ▪ Alicia Crank, Planning Board ▪ Ed Dorame, Diversity Commission ▪ Lindsey Echelbarger, Cascadia Art Museum ▪ Fred Gouge, Port of Edmonds ▪ Joe McIalwain, Edmonds Center for the Arts ▪ Suzy Maloney, Arts Commission ▪ Tom Mesaros, City Council ▪ Mary Monroe, Economic Development Commission ▪ Tanya Sharp, Arts Commission ▪ Kim Smith, Edmonds Driftwood Players ▪ Pam Stuller, Downtown Alliance ▪ Neil Tibbott, City Council ▪ Greg Urban, Chamber of Commerce 5.3.a Packet Pg. 158 Attachment: Edmonds Arts and Culture 2017 Economic Impact Study 2018_0130 (Study of Economic Impacts of Arts and Culture) City of Edmonds | Arts and Culture 2017 Economic Impact Study 4 economy and profiles residents and visitors who participated in the arts between June 3, 2017 and October 24, 2017. The survey was promoted to arts and culture patrons and consumers – both residents and visitors – and was designed to be brief and approachable. To maximize participation at events throughout the summer, the survey consisted of close-ended questions and prioritized input needed for the primary purpose of this study: determining the economic impact of the arts and culture. This survey was promoted through a variety of channels including the City of Edmonds project website, local media, flyers, community newsletters, local arts and culture organizations, community volunteers, the Project Advisory Group, and City staff. The survey yielded 1,354 survey participants, consisting of 745 residents and 609 visitors. For a map of respondents see page 24. The Story Collector was a supplement to the Community & Visitor Survey, and collected data to tell a well-rounded story about the role arts and culture plays in Edmonds. The Story Collector was promoted similarly to the Community & Visitor Survey, and gathered qualitative information through open-ended questions about the ways people experience art in the Edmonds community and how those experiences impact their life and shape the community around them. Unlike the Community & Visitor Survey, the Story Collector was aimed at residents and business owners across Edmonds, not just those active in the arts and culture sector. A total of 34 people participated in the Story Collector, and shared their perspectives on how arts and cultural experiences in Edmonds have impacted their life and created a sense of community. These perspectives are displayed in quotes later in the report. 5.3.a Packet Pg. 159 Attachment: Edmonds Arts and Culture 2017 Economic Impact Study 2018_0130 (Study of Economic Impacts of Arts and Culture) City of Edmonds | Arts and Culture 2017 Economic Impact Study 5 Source: Esri; BERK 2017. Exhibit 2. Average Household Size Community Profile of Edmonds This section profiles the Edmonds community using available data on population growth, household income, race/ethnicity, and age. Data from Snohomish County and the area encompassing a 30-minute drivetime from downtown Edmonds are displayed for comparison. The area of the 30-minute drivetime can be seen in Exhibit 25, which shows the geography in the context of survey respondents. Edmonds saw modest population growth over the 2000-2017 period, as shown in Exhibit 1. In the first ten years of this period, Edmond’s Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) was 0.1%, as compared to Snohomish County, which grew at 1.6%, and the 30-minute drivetime area, which grew at 1.1%. However, since 2010, Edmonds has seen its average annual growth increase to 0.7% and the 30-minute drivetime area has increased to 1.6%, while the county slowed slightly to 1.4% growth per year. Exhibit 1. Population and Average Annual Growth Source: Esri; BERK, 2017. Exhibit 2 shows that the average household size in Edmonds decreased in the 2000- 2010 period, but has since slightly increased from 2010-2017. Snohomish County and the 30-minute drivetime area follow the same pattern of average household sizes in this period, but both have higher average household sizes. 39,509 41,793 716,296 891,373 606,024 784,389 2000 2010 2017 Edmonds 30-Min Drivetime Snohomish County 0.1% 1.1% 1.6% 0.7% 1.6% 1.4% Edmonds 30-Min Drivetime Snohomish County 2000-10 CAGR 2010-17 CAGR 2.32 2.37 2.65 2.26 2.36 2.62 2.27 2.38 2.64 Edmonds 30-Min Drivetime Snohomish County 2000 2010 2017 5.3.a Packet Pg. 160 Attachment: Edmonds Arts and Culture 2017 Economic Impact Study 2018_0130 (Study of Economic Impacts of Arts and Culture) City of Edmonds | Arts and Culture 2017 Economic Impact Study 6 Exhibit 3 displays household income, and shows that both the median and average household incomes in Edmonds are higher than those in the drivetime area and even larger compared to the county. Edmonds is projected to get wealthier over time. In 2017, 69% of households make $50,000 or more a year, and by 2022 it’s projected that 72% of households will make more than $50,000. Exhibit 3. Household Income Source: Esri; BERK, 2017. Note: Due to rounding, percentages presented in this chart do not add up to 100%. Edmonds 30-Min Drivetime Snohomish County ⬛ > $200,000 ⬛ $150,000 - $199,999 ⬛ $100,000 - $149,999 ⬛ $50,000 - $99,999 ⬛ < $50,000 Median Household Income 81,544$ 89,907$ 76,158$ 85,102$ 75,476$ 82,360$ Average Household Income 111,135$ 123,453$ 101,983$ 115,968$ 93,836$ 106,057$ Per Capita Income 48,781$ 54,073$ 42,294$ 47,868$ 35,467$ 39,884$ 31%28% 28%27% 19%21% 10%12% 11%12% 2017 2022 32%28% 31%29% 18%21% 9%10% 10%11% 2017 2022 31%28% 34%32% 19%22% 8%10% 7%8% 2017 2022 5.3.a Packet Pg. 161 Attachment: Edmonds Arts and Culture 2017 Economic Impact Study 2018_0130 (Study of Economic Impacts of Arts and Culture) City of Edmonds | Arts and Culture 2017 Economic Impact Study 7 As shown in Exhibit 4, Edmonds’ population is older than that of Snohomish County and the 30-minute drivetime area, and in all three geographies population is aging over time. In 2017, the city’s median age was 48, as compared to the county and drivetime area’s median age of 38. In 2010, 19% of Edmonds residents were older than 65, and by 2017 this had grown to 23%. During that same period, Snohomish County’s population of adults age 65 and older increased from 10% to 13%. Over the same time, the 30-minute drivetime area’s population of 65 and older increased from 11% to 14%. Exhibit 4. Age Source: Esri; BERK, 2017. ⬛ 65+ ⬛ 35 - 64 ⬛ 0 - 34 36%35% 45%42% 19%23% 2010 2017 Edmonds 48%46% 41%40% 11%14% 2010 2017 30-Min Drivetime 47%46% 43%41% 10%13% 2010 2017 Snohomish County 2017 Median Age Edmonds 48 30-Min Drivetime 39 Snohomish County 38 5.3.a Packet Pg. 162 Attachment: Edmonds Arts and Culture 2017 Economic Impact Study 2018_0130 (Study of Economic Impacts of Arts and Culture) City of Edmonds | Arts and Culture 2017 Economic Impact Study 8 As shown in Exhibit 5, Edmonds is growing in racial diversity, with the proportion of people of color increasing from 17% of the population in 2010 to 20% in 2017. Overall, Edmonds’ population is less racially diverse than the county and 30-minute drivetime area. The county proportion of people of color increased from 22% to 25% over the same period, as shown in Note: Due to rounding, percentage breakdown for people of color presented in this chart do not add up to total percentage. Exhibit 7. Over the same period the drivetime area proportion of people of color increased from 25% to 29%, as shown in Exhibit 6. Exhibit 5. Edmonds Race Source: Esri; BERK, 2017. Exhibit 6. 30-Minute Drivetime Race Source: Esri; BERK, 2017. Note: Due to rounding, percentage breakdown for people of color presented in this chart do not add up to total percentage. ⬛ Some Other Race Alone ⬛ Black Alone ⬛ Two or More Races ⬛ Asian Alone ⬛ Non-White ⬛ White Alone 2010 2017 Edmonds 0.2 83% 17% 7% 4% 3% 3% 0.10 0.2 80% 20% 9% 5% 3% 3% 20%17% ⬛ Some Other Race Alone ⬛ Black Alone ⬛ Two or More Races ⬛ Asian Alone ⬛ Non-White ⬛ White Alone 2010 2017 30 Minute Drivetime 0.2 71% 29% 15% 6% 4% 5% 0.2 75% 25% 12% 5% 3% 4% 0.10 29%25% 30-Minute Drivetime 5.3.a Packet Pg. 163 Attachment: Edmonds Arts and Culture 2017 Economic Impact Study 2018_0130 (Study of Economic Impacts of Arts and Culture) City of Edmonds | Arts and Culture 2017 Economic Impact Study 9 Exhibit 7. Snohomish County Race Source: Esri; BERK, 2017. Note: Due to rounding, percentage breakdown for people of color presented in this chart do not add up to total percentage. ⬛ Some Other Race Alone ⬛ Black Alone ⬛ Two or More Races ⬛ Asian Alone ⬛ Non-White ⬛ White Alone 2010 2017 Snohomish County 0.2 75% 25% 11% 5% 3% 6% 0.2 78% 22% 9% 5% 3% 6% 0.10 25%22% 5.3.a Packet Pg. 164 Attachment: Edmonds Arts and Culture 2017 Economic Impact Study 2018_0130 (Study of Economic Impacts of Arts and Culture) City of Edmonds | Arts and Culture 2017 Economic Impact Study 10 The population in Edmonds has become more educated over time and has greater educational attainment than in Snohomish County, and is about equal to the 30-minute drivetime area in 2017. As shown in Exhibit 8, the share of the population in Edmonds with a bachelor’s degree increased from 43% to 49% from 2010 to 2017. Over the same period, Snohomish County’s share increased from 28% to 32%. In 2017, the 30-minute drivetime area’s share of the population with a bachelor’s degree or higher was 50%. Educational attainment data for 2010 is unavailable for the 30-minute drivetime. Exhibit 8. Edmonds, Snohomish County, and 30-Minute Drivetime Adult (25+) Educational Attainment Source: American Community Survey, 2015 5-Year Estimates, Table S1501; Esri; BERK, 2017. Note: Due to rounding, some percentages presented in this chart does not add up to 100%. ⬛ No High School Diploma ⬛ High School Graduate ⬛ Associate's or Some College ⬛ Bachelor's Degree or Higher Edmonds 30-Minute Drivetime Snohomish County 43%49% 35%30% 18%17% 4%4% 2010 2017 50% 29% 16% 6% 2017 28%32% 37%36% 26%24% 9%8% 2010 2017 5.3.a Packet Pg. 165 Attachment: Edmonds Arts and Culture 2017 Economic Impact Study 2018_0130 (Study of Economic Impacts of Arts and Culture) City of Edmonds | Arts and Culture 2017 Economic Impact Study 11 Arts and Culture Organization and Business Survey In July 2017, the Arts and Culture Organization and Business Survey was provided to 71 entities listed in the May 2017 Directory of Arts Organizations and Businesses compiled by the Edmonds Arts Commission. A total of 40 organizations and businesses responded to the Edmonds Arts and Culture Organization and Business Survey (56% response rate): 15 businesses, 23 not-for-profit entities, and two public sector entities, namely the City of Edmonds Arts Commission and Edmonds Center for the Arts (ECA). The ECA facility is owned and operated by the Edmonds Public Facilities District (EPFD) established by the City in 2001 – a public sector entity with a five-member board. ECA operations are supported by a separate not-for-profit organization with its own Board of Directors, which works side by side with the EPFD board. Not all respondents completed every question, as noted in the exhibits and discussion that follow. The survey collected self-reported financial data on revenue, expenditures, and capital improvement spending; revenue sources for earned and contributed income; and business information on employment, visitor attendance, and overnight lodging. It’s important to note that there are likely other arts and cultural entities in Edmonds that were not listed in the May 2017 Directory and therefore did not receive the survey. These entities may include informal arts programs or faith-based communities. ARTS AND CULTURE ORGANIZATIONS AND BUSINESSES IN EDMONDS Edmonds prides itself on the significant role arts and culture play in the community’s quality of life, identify, and economic vitality. Many arts and culture entities – including for-profit businesses and public or not-for-profit organizations – are based in Edmonds, and offer a wide variety of visual, literary, and performing arts. As of late January 2018, the City counts at least 57 businesses and 46 not-for-profit entities (including “core” arts and culture not-for-profits with a central focus on providing arts-related activities as well as ECA, divisions or commissions of larger organizations such as the City, School District, Library, and small clubs or guilds) as part of the arts and culture sector. These entities represent a wide range of arts and culture focus – for example, music, visual arts, theater, and heritage – and arts-related roles, such as classes, sales of art, services, and festivals. The organizations themselves range in size from small, online businesses serving niche cultural interests to Edmonds Center for the Arts, a large performing arts venue with more than 75,000 attendees annually. For a city of Edmonds’ size, there is a bounty of unique arts and culture offerings, underscoring how the community is a cultural destination in the Puget Sound region. To learn more about the organizations and businesses that make up the arts and culture sector, see the 2018 Directory of Edmonds Arts Organizations and Businesses in the Appendix. 5.3.a Packet Pg. 166 Attachment: Edmonds Arts and Culture 2017 Economic Impact Study 2018_0130 (Study of Economic Impacts of Arts and Culture) City of Edmonds | Arts and Culture 2017 Economic Impact Study 12 The location of arts organizations and businesses with physical addresses listed in the City of Edmonds May 2017 Directory of Arts Organizations and Businesses are shown in Exhibit 9. Most arts organizations and businesses known by the City are clustered in the downtown Edmonds area. Exhibit 9. Arts Organizations and Businesses in Edmonds, with a Closeup of Downtown Source: BERK, 2017. 5.3.a Packet Pg. 167 Attachment: Edmonds Arts and Culture 2017 Economic Impact Study 2018_0130 (Study of Economic Impacts of Arts and Culture) City of Edmonds | Arts and Culture 2017 Economic Impact Study 13 ORGANIZATION AND BUSINESS SURVEY FINDINGS Arts and Culture Focus and Role Primary arts focus describes the main artistic discipline provided by the organization or business. All 40 entities provided information on their business or organization’s primary arts focus, as displayed in Exhibit 10. The largest group, 30% of respondents, focus on visual arts (12 organizations), followed by 15% (six organizations) in music, 13% (five organizations) in arts education, 10% (four organizations) with a multidisciplinary focus, and 8% (three organizations each) in dance, literary arts, and festivals and markets. The primary arts-related role refers to the primary function or method of delivery for the organization or business. All 40 respondents provided information on their role, as displayed in Exhibit 11. Thirty percent (12 organizations) present or produce performing arts; 28% (11 organizations) provide arts classes, workshops, and conferences; and 18% (seven organizations) sell works of art. Ten percent (four organizations) provide services to the arts and artists, including promoting arts in the community. Many organizations commented that they play multiple roles, such as providing classes as well as selling works of art, making it difficult to select just one role. As both Exhibit 10 and Exhibit 11 reveal, there is a great deal of crossover and complexity for arts and culture focus and role across responding organizations and businesses in Edmonds. Most focus areas are provided by both business and not-for-profit. 5.3.a Packet Pg. 168 Attachment: Edmonds Arts and Culture 2017 Economic Impact Study 2018_0130 (Study of Economic Impacts of Arts and Culture) City of Edmonds | Arts and Culture 2017 Economic Impact Study 14 Exhibit 10. Primary Arts Focus Source: BERK, 2017. Exhibit 11. Primary Arts-Related Role Source: BERK, 2017. 5% 10% 12.5% 10% 2.5% 2.5% 5% 7.5% 5% 2.5% 20% 2.5% 2.5% 2.5% 5% 2.5% 2.5% 12 6 5 4 3 3 3 2 1 1 Visual arts Music Arts education Multidisciplinary Dance Literary arts Festival/market Theater Heritage Film/media Public sector Not-for-profit Businesses 2.5% 2.5% 22.5% 15% 10% 7.5% 2.5% 5% 10% 17.5% 5% 12 11 7 4 3 2 1 Presenting/producing performing arts Arts classes, workshops, conferences Sales of works of art (visual, literary, etc.) Services to the arts and artists Museum/heritage Sales of arts supplies and materials Arts/cultural festivals Public sector Not-for-profit Businesses 5.3.a Packet Pg. 169 Attachment: Edmonds Arts and Culture 2017 Economic Impact Study 2018_0130 (Study of Economic Impacts of Arts and Culture) City of Edmonds | Arts and Culture 2017 Economic Impact Study 15 Financial Snapshot A snapshot of Edmonds arts organizations’ revenues, expenditures, and capital improvement spending is shown in Exhibit 12. Not all organizations reported financial data, and the totals in Exhibit 12 only reflect the data provided. All values are in 2017 dollars; data originally reported from fiscal year 2015-2016 have been adjusted to 2017 dollars using the CPI inflation index. Additional data points were filled in using publicly available grant applications. Exhibit 13 shows the percentage breakdown of total revenue and expenditures by category of arts and culture entity. Exhibit 12. Financial Snapshot of Edmonds Arts and Culture Organizations and Businesses, $2017 Total Gross Revenue Total Operating Expenditures Total Spending on Capital Improvements Public sector (ECA and the Arts Commission) $2,421,921 (n=2) $2,464,980 (n=2) $156,883 (n=1) Not-for-profit $3,842,371 (n=22) $3,736,628 (n=21) $48,577 (n=18) For-profit $1,623,997 (n=7) $1,337,499 (n=6) $19,690 (n=5) Total $7,888,289 $7,539,107 $225,150 * Public sector agencies are inclusive of Edmonds Center for the Arts and the Edmonds Arts Commission. Source: BERK, 2017. Exhibit 13. Total Gross Revenue and Operating Expenditures Source: BERK, 2017. Note: Due to rounding, percentages presented in this chart do not add up to 100%. 31% 33% 49% 50% 21% 18% $7,888,289 $7,539,107 Total Gross Revenue Total Operating Expenditures Public sector Not-for-profit Businesses 5.3.a Packet Pg. 170 Attachment: Edmonds Arts and Culture 2017 Economic Impact Study 2018_0130 (Study of Economic Impacts of Arts and Culture) City of Edmonds | Arts and Culture 2017 Economic Impact Study 16 Income of Edmonds Arts and Culture Organizations and Businesses Revenue sources can provide information on the sustainability and security of funds. Exhibit 14 breaks down income sources by earned and contributed income, and shows that Edmonds arts and culture organizations largely earn their revenues. Thirty-one organizations (two public sector entities, 22 not-for- profits, and seven businesses) provided revenue information. Earned income accounts for 99% of for- profit businesses’ revenues. One of the seven businesses reported receiving donated goods and services. Not-for-profits and government agencies also depend on earned income; 65% of not-for-profits’ revenues and 58% of public sector agencies’ revenues come from earned income. Exhibit 14. Composition of Revenue Sources Source: BERK, 2017. Comparisons to other national and regional studies are useful context for the results of this study. A 2014 ArtsFund study of the Central Puget Sound region found that across arts, cultural, and scientific organizations in the region, 56% of revenue came from earned income and 44% from contributed income (ArtsFund, 2014). A 2011 national study from Americans for the Arts found that not-for-profit arts organizations bring in 60% of revenue through earned income (Americans for the Arts, 2011). Nationally, not-for-profit arts organizations are generating an increasing share of their revenues through earned revenue as grant and public funding sources decline. A 2015 study from the Greater Philadelphia Cultural Alliance looked at not-for-profit arts and culture organizations across 11 cities and found that nonprofit arts and culture groups experienced an increase of 25.4% in earned income between 2009 and 2012, while contributed income declined 3.5% (Hrywna, 2015). The data from the Arts and Culture Organization and Businesses Survey are in line with these regional and national estimates of revenue sources. The results suggest that Edmonds not-for-profit arts organizations are meeting or exceeding sector benchmarks for earned revenue. 99% 65% 58% 1% 35% 42% $1,623,997 $3,842,371 $2,421,921 Businesses Not-for-profit Public sector Earned Income Contributed Income 5.3.a Packet Pg. 171 Attachment: Edmonds Arts and Culture 2017 Economic Impact Study 2018_0130 (Study of Economic Impacts of Arts and Culture) City of Edmonds | Arts and Culture 2017 Economic Impact Study 17 Earned income sources, shown in Exhibit 15, vary by types of arts and culture organization. Based on the financial data provided, businesses bring in 63% of their earned income through tuition and workshops, and 35% of earned income through sales. Not-for-profit organizations bring in earned income through a more diverse set of sources, including box office and admissions (36%), sales (30%), tuition and workshops (14%), and facility rentals (12%). Public sector entities, specifically ECA, bring in earned income primarily from box office and admissions (48%), and facility rentals (37%). Exhibit 15. Composition of Earned Income Sources Source: BERK, 2017. 2% 36% 48% 63% 14% 7% 35% 30% 8% 12% 37% 6% $1,607,997 $2,489,540 $1,416,392 Businesses Not-for-profit Public sector Box office/admissions (includes memberships)Tuition/workshops Sales (includes merchandise, concessions, artwork)Facility rentals Other % breakdown not reported 5.3.a Packet Pg. 172 Attachment: Edmonds Arts and Culture 2017 Economic Impact Study 2018_0130 (Study of Economic Impacts of Arts and Culture) City of Edmonds | Arts and Culture 2017 Economic Impact Study 18 Contributed income sources are shown in Exhibit 16. Individual contributions refer to financial contributions and donated goods and services from individual donors, while corporate gifts include financial contributions, employee matches, and donated goods or services from businesses. Government funding or grants refers to financial contributions from state, county, or city government. Foundation funding refers to giving from private grant-providing organizations. The mix of contributed income sources differs across types of organizations. Thirty-five percent of not-for- profit organizations’ contributed income comes from individual contributions, followed by 13% from government funding or grants and 10% each from corporate gifts and foundation funding. Among government agencies, 66% of contributed income comes from individuals, and 22% from corporate gifts. Nationally, the 2016 National Arts Index from Americans for the Arts found that federal funding from Congress for the arts has remained relatively stable, but state dollars flowing to state arts agencies has been fluid over the last decade (Americans for the Arts, 2016). The study also found that after declining for six consecutive years, state funding flowing to state arts agencies increased in 2013 as the economy recovered from the Great Recession. However, it’s important to note that Washington state’s legislative appropriation to state arts agencies is $0.23 per capita, which is less than Oregon ($0.46), Idaho ($0.48), Montana ($0.50), or California ($0.47), and ranks the state 45th in per capita arts appropriation (National Assembly of State Arts Agencies, 2018). Exhibit 16. Composition of Contributed Income Sources Source: BERK, 2017. 13% 4% 10% 8% 10% 22% 35% 66% 4%28%$1,352,832 $1,005,528 Not-for-profit Public sector Government funding or grants Foundation funding Corporate gifts Individuals Other % breakdown not reported 5.3.a Packet Pg. 173 Attachment: Edmonds Arts and Culture 2017 Economic Impact Study 2018_0130 (Study of Economic Impacts of Arts and Culture) City of Edmonds | Arts and Culture 2017 Economic Impact Study 19 Expenditures of Edmonds Arts and Culture Organizations Twenty-nine organizations (two public sector entities, 21 not-for-profits, and six businesses) provided information on operating expenditures as displayed in Exhibit 17. Personnel refers to salaries and benefits for full or part-time employees. Mortgage or rent includes facility space, office space, and any additional venue rentals. Equipment costs include purchase or rental fees. Costs of production and goods sold include artist/performance fees, wholesale costs of goods, rights fees. Marketing includes advertising, printing, and graphics. Professional services include accounting, auditing, and legal fees. Among not-for-profits, 31% of operating expenditures are in personnel, followed by 15% spent on production costs and goods sold, and 14% on mortgage or rent. Edmonds arts sector businesses spend 36% of operating expenditures on personnel, followed by 23% on mortgage or rent and 19% on production costs and goods sold. Government agencies spend 40% of operating expenditures on personnel, followed by 27% on mortgage or rent and 18% on professional services. Exhibit 17. Composition of Operating Expenditures Source: BERK, 2017. The 2014 ArtsFund study of the Central Puget Sound region found that 54% of expenditures were employee expenses, while 46% of expenditures were other operating expenses (ArtsFund, 2014). Compared to this number, Edmonds arts and culture organizations spend a lower percentage of operating expenditures on employee expenses. It is likely that some of these human resources costs may have been reported by respondents as part of cost of production. Capital Improvement Spending Capital expenditures can include spending for new facilities or physical improvements. Eighteen not-for- profit organizations spent a total of $48,577, one public sector agency (Edmonds Center for the Arts) spent $156,883, and five businesses spent $19,690. 36% 31% 40% 23% 14%7% 19% 15% 27% 10% 8%18% 6% 8% 4% 9% 11% $1,337,499 $3,736,628 $2,464,980 Businesses Not-for-profit Public sector Personnel Mortgage/rent Equipment costs Cost of production and/or goods sold Marketing Professional servicesTaxesOther % breakdown not reported 5.3.a Packet Pg. 174 Attachment: Edmonds Arts and Culture 2017 Economic Impact Study 2018_0130 (Study of Economic Impacts of Arts and Culture) City of Edmonds | Arts and Culture 2017 Economic Impact Study 20 Employment Thirty-eight Edmonds arts and culture organizations and businesses (two public sector entities, 22 not-for- profits, and 14 businesses) provided employment information. As shown in Exhibit 18, respondents reported that they employ a total of 207 positions, of which 27% (56 jobs) are full-time, 43% (88 jobs) are part-time, and 30% (63 jobs) are contract jobs. These estimates are roughly in line with the 2014 ArtsFund study, which found that in the Central Puget Sound region, employment in arts, cultural, and scientific organizations was made up of 17% full-time, 39% part-time, and 41% contractual positions (ArtsFund, 2014). The ArtsFund study also found that 27% of these positions are administrative, while 73% are non-administrative. Nationwide, the 2016 National Arts Index found that arts employment remains strong, and that the number of working artists grew from 2.1 million in 2002 to 2.22 million in 2013. Self-employed “artist- entrepreneurs” grew from 554,000 in 2002 to 766,000 in 2013 (Americans for the Arts, 2016). Exhibit 18. Employment in Edmonds Arts Organizations and Businesses EMPLOYEES Full-time 56 27% Part-time 88 43% Contract 63 30% Total employees 207 100% Source: BERK, 2017. The Bureau of Economic Analysis released data from its Arts and Cultural Production Satellite Account (ACPSA), and estimated that in 2014, there were 154,230 arts-related workers in Washington State. This number represents an increase of nearly 6% over the previous year’s data, and was much higher than the U.S. rate of growth in this sector. ACPSA employment growth rate of 1.26%. While Edmonds arts-related employment is but a small percentage of Washington’s total ACPSA count, it highlights the economic growth of the arts and culture sector both nationally and in Washington State (Bureau of Economic Analysis, 2017). 5.3.a Packet Pg. 175 Attachment: Edmonds Arts and Culture 2017 Economic Impact Study 2018_0130 (Study of Economic Impacts of Arts and Culture) City of Edmonds | Arts and Culture 2017 Economic Impact Study 21 Volunteers Volunteers provide valuable assistance to not-for-profit and public arts organizations both for administrative and artistic or technical work. In this survey, Edmonds not-for-profit arts and culture organizations estimated that 1,722 volunteers worked with their organizations, donating a total of 68,060 hours for an average of about 40 hours per volunteer annually. This information is displayed in Exhibit 19. This estimate roughly aligns with results of other regional and national studies on volunteer contributions in the arts community. The ArtsFund 2014 study found that across the Central Puget Sound region, volunteers in cultural organizations averaged 41 hours per volunteer (ArtsFund, 2014). A 2012 study from Americans for the Arts estimated an average of 43.2 hours per volunteer in metropolitan areas with a population of over one million (Americans for the Arts, 2012). Across the county, the 2016 National Arts Index found that volunteering at arts organizations was the choice of service for over 2.2 million people in 2013, a 16% increase from 2010 (Americans for the Arts, 2016). Exhibit 19. Volunteer Contributions to Edmonds Not-for-Profit Arts Organizations VOLUNTEERS Total annual volunteers 1,722 Annual volunteer hours 68,060 Average annual hours per volunteer 39.5 Source: BERK, 2017. Attendees, Clients, or Customers Thirty-five Edmonds arts and culture organizations and businesses (two public sector entities, 22 not-for- profits, and 11 businesses) provided information on their attendees and customers. As displayed in Exhibit 20, respondents reported a total of 424,197 visitors who participated in arts-related activities or visited arts-related venues in Edmonds. Exhibit 21 shows the reported attendee and customer resident profile, and Exhibit 22 shows the reported attendee and customer age demographic profile. Exhibit 20. Edmonds Arts Attendees, Clients, or Customers ATTENDEES, CLIENTS, CUSTOMERS From Edmonds 229,874 54% From outside Edmonds, within 50 miles 162,098 38% From over 50 miles away 31,806 7% Total attendees, clients, or customers 424,197 Source: BERK, 2017. Note: Due to rounding, the percentages in this table do not add up to 100%. 5.3.a Packet Pg. 176 Attachment: Edmonds Arts and Culture 2017 Economic Impact Study 2018_0130 (Study of Economic Impacts of Arts and Culture) City of Edmonds | Arts and Culture 2017 Economic Impact Study 22 Organizations and businesses report that 54% of attendees and customers are from Edmonds, 38% are from outside of Edmonds but within 50 miles, and 7% are from more than 50 miles away. The profile of visitors is similar across public sector agencies, not-for-profit organizations, and businesses, as shown in Exhibit 21. The reported figures suggest that attendees and customers from Edmonds are a solid foundation for organizations and business, but those who travel from a short distance beyond Edmonds are also a key market. Tourism from beyond a 50-mile radius represents a modest share for entities that responded. Exhibit 21. Composition of Edmonds Arts Attendee and Customer by Residence Source: BERK, 2017. Note: Due to rounding, some percentages in this chart do not add up to 100%. As shown in Exhibit 22, organizations report that 16% of visitors are 18 years old or younger, 28% are between 19 and 40 years old, and just more than half (55%) are older than 40 years old. The age demographics of attendees and customers are similar across public sector, not-for-profit, and for-profit organizations. The preponderance of attendees and customers older than 40 years of age aligns with the demographic profile of Edmonds described in Exhibit 4 of the Community Profile. Exhibit 22. Composition of Edmonds Arts Attendee and Customer by Age Source: BERK, 2017. Note: Due to rounding, some percentages in this chart do not add up to 100%. 57% 58% 40% 54% 34% 35% 53% 38% 9% 6% 7% 7% 164,235 173,962 86,000 424,197 Businesses Not-for-profit Public sector All organizations City of Edmonds Outside City of Edmonds, but within 50 miles More than 50 miles away 13% 18% 16% 16% 32% 29% 21% 28% 55% 52% 63% 55% 164,235 173,962 86,000 424,197 Businesses Not-for-profit Public sector All organizations 18 years old or younger 19-40 years old Older than 40 years old % breakdown not reported 5.3.a Packet Pg. 177 Attachment: Edmonds Arts and Culture 2017 Economic Impact Study 2018_0130 (Study of Economic Impacts of Arts and Culture) City of Edmonds | Arts and Culture 2017 Economic Impact Study 23 Lodging and Travel Accommodations Arts and culture businesses and organizations contribute to the local economy through lodging and travel accommodations for their visiting artists and performers. Out of 36 Edmonds arts and culture organizations that answered a survey question regarding lodging and travel accommodations, 13 responded that they had arranged or suggested accommodations for artists, performers, crew, and vendors to stay in Edmonds. As displayed in Exhibit 23, organizations arranged accommodations for 1,773 total nights of overnight stays from artists, performers, crew, and vendors; 1,766 of these nights (99%) were spent in paid lodging in Edmonds. Only five nights were spent in paid lodging outside of Edmonds, specifically at the Embassy Suites in Lynnwood. Two nights were reported spent in non-paid lodging in Edmonds – in members’ or friends’ homes. Edmonds Center for the Arts arranged 1,600 lodging nights, one organization arranged 100 nights, and the other organizations arranged under 25 nights of lodging each. According to the Washington State Office of Financial Management, Snohomish County’s Lodging Per Diem Rate for the summer season is $135 a night. This suggests that lodging for ECA performers alone contributed an estimated $216,000 in direct spending in Edmonds (Office of Financial Management Statewide Accounting, 2017). For more information on the economic benefits of travel and lodging from visitors see Exhibit 26 and Exhibit 27. Exhibit 23. Lodging and Travel Accommodations for Edmonds Arts Events LODGING NIGHTS Paid lodging in Edmonds 1,766 Paid lodging outside of Edmonds 5 Non-paid lodging in Edmonds 2 Total overnight stays 1,773 Source: BERK, 2017. 5.3.a Packet Pg. 178 Attachment: Edmonds Arts and Culture 2017 Economic Impact Study 2018_0130 (Study of Economic Impacts of Arts and Culture) City of Edmonds | Arts and Culture 2017 Economic Impact Study 24 Community and Visitor Survey A total of 1,354 respondents completed the Community and Visitor Survey. Of respondents, 745 live in Edmonds and 609 live outside of Edmonds. The survey asked participants about their preferences for arts and culture, how much they spend on arts and how often, and demographic information. Results were cross-tabbed by Edmonds resident and nonresident status and age. Because some respondents chose not to answer their age, cross-tabbed results will not equal the total number of survey respondents. Of respondents who provided identifiable ZIP code information, 823 people came from approximately 50 miles of downtown Edmonds, two people came from within Washington State but outside of 50-miles, and 50 people came from out of state. This information is displayed in Exhibit 24; it suggests that Edmonds is drawing attendees from North Seattle, Shoreline, Lynnwood, Everett, Kingston, and parts of Kirkland. Exhibit 24 also shows a 30-minute drivetime from downtown Edmonds. Exhibit 25 focuses on respondents within a 30-minute drivetime of downtown Edmonds. Drivetime analysis shows that the potential market for the Edmonds arts sector is more influenced by a person’s willingness to travel in time rather than in distance. Fifty-five percent of respondents came from within the approximate boundaries of a 30-minute drivetime. This aligns with a recent study from the National Center for Arts Research, which found that arts become “radically local” for communities where commute times are long and proximity to an arts and culture organization has a significant impact on purchase likelihood (National Center for Arts Research, 2017). 5.3.a Packet Pg. 179 Attachment: Edmonds Arts and Culture 2017 Economic Impact Study 2018_0130 (Study of Economic Impacts of Arts and Culture) City of Edmonds | Arts and Culture 2017 Economic Impact Study 25 Exhibit 24. Survey Respondents within 50 Miles of Downtown Edmonds Source: BERK, 2017. 5.3.a Packet Pg. 180 Attachment: Edmonds Arts and Culture 2017 Economic Impact Study 2018_0130 (Study of Economic Impacts of Arts and Culture) City of Edmonds | Arts and Culture 2017 Economic Impact Study 26 Exhibit 25. Survey Respondents within a 30-Minute Drivetime of Edmonds Source: BERK, 2017. 5.3.a Packet Pg. 181 Attachment: Edmonds Arts and Culture 2017 Economic Impact Study 2018_0130 (Study of Economic Impacts of Arts and Culture) City of Edmonds | Arts and Culture 2017 Economic Impact Study 27 In addition to admissions costs, arts events contribute to the local economy through food and lodging. Patrons who travel to Edmonds arts and cultural organizations will frequently spend money in areas beyond admissions costs, such as food, overnight accommodation, and other purchases. As shown in Exhibit 26, all age groups purchased (or planned to purchase) food, drink, and other items during their stay in Edmonds. The Americans for the Arts 2016 report, Arts & Economic Prosperity 5, provides a useful estimate regarding local business spending by arts audiences. Their average for per person expenditures (not including the cost of admission to an arts program) is $31.47, with more than half of that ($16.82) related to purchase of meals, snacks, and refreshments (Americans for the Arts, 2016). Research shows that an arts and culture organization’s proximity to complementary leisure activities, such as bars and restaurants, can increase patronage from greater physical distances. Evidence shows that people from areas with less access to arts and culture offerings nearby are more likely to travel further if they can reach a “concentrated arts district” (National Center for Arts Research, 2017). As shown in Exhibit 26, survey respondents under age 65 report having visited (or plan to visit) the waterfront or a park. This suggests that recreation plays a role in attracting younger populations to activities and events. According to the Wall Street Journal, current retail trends show that younger people prefer to engage in experiences and are more attracted to place-based activities than older generations (Binkley, 2017). Exhibit 26. What Visitors Do or Plan to Do During Their Stay in Edmonds Source: BERK, 2017. Note: Due to rounding, some percentages in this chart do not add up to 100%. 58% 59% 76% 17% 18% 24% 25% 22% 0%20%40%60%80%100% 0-34 35-64 65 and over Buy a meal, drink, or snack. Buy something. Visit the waterfront or a park. All responses 64% 20% 16% 5.3.a Packet Pg. 182 Attachment: Edmonds Arts and Culture 2017 Economic Impact Study 2018_0130 (Study of Economic Impacts of Arts and Culture) City of Edmonds | Arts and Culture 2017 Economic Impact Study 28 Exhibit 27 displays data on the percentage of overnight stays for visitors to Edmonds as well as distribution by age group. Most visitors are not staying overnight in their visit to Edmonds, but for those that are staying overnight, people older than 35 are more likely to pay for lodging either in or outside of Edmonds. Exhibit 27. Overnight Stays in Edmonds for Visitors Source: BERK, 2017. Note: Due to rounding, the percentages in the donut chart do not add up to 100%. 78% 82% 74% 6% 10% 11% 3% 3% 17% 5% 12% 0%20%40%60%80%100% 0-34 35-64 65 and over I am not staying overnight. In paid lodging in Edmonds. In paid lodging outside of Edmonds. With friends or family. All responses 81% 7% 2%9% 5.3.a Packet Pg. 183 Attachment: Edmonds Arts and Culture 2017 Economic Impact Study 2018_0130 (Study of Economic Impacts of Arts and Culture) City of Edmonds | Arts and Culture 2017 Economic Impact Study 29 Exhibit 28 shows that respondents who are older are more likely to visit Edmonds specifically for an arts or cultural activity. Exhibit 28. Respondents Who Came for an Arts or Cultural Activity Source: BERK, 2017. Note: Due to rounding, some percentages in age breakdown do not add up to 100%. Exhibit 29 through Exhibit 31display data solicited from residents only. Exhibit 29 shows that older respondents spend more annually on tickets for arts and cultural events or works of art than do younger respondents. Exhibit 29. Annual Household Spending on Tickets for Arts and Cultural Events or Works of Art in Edmonds Source: BERK, 2017. Note: Due to rounding, some percentages in age breakdown do not add up to 100%. 66% 80% 85% 14% 13% 12% 20% 8% 3% 0%20%40%60%80%100% 0-34 35-64 65 and over Yes, it was the most important reason for the trip. Yes, but it was not the most important reason for the trip. No. 78% 15% 7% All responses 28% 13% 5% 64% 67% 52% 5% 13% 28% 3% 8% 15% 0%20%40%60%80%100% 0-34 35-64 65 and over $0. Less than $500. Between $500 and $1,000. More than $1,000. 11% 62% 17% 10% All responses 5.3.a Packet Pg. 184 Attachment: Edmonds Arts and Culture 2017 Economic Impact Study 2018_0130 (Study of Economic Impacts of Arts and Culture) City of Edmonds | Arts and Culture 2017 Economic Impact Study 30 As shown in Exhibit 30 and Exhibit 31, younger respondents (ages 0-34 and 35-64) have a greater share of spending than respondents 65 and over in the “More than $500” category for spending that includes arts and culture lessons, classes, or workshops as well as arts-related equipment, supplies, and materials. These data suggest that younger people may have greater interest in participatory arts and culture experiences like dance or drawing lessons, as opposed to passive arts and culture experiences like going to show or buying a painting. This data is in line with national trends and research regarding increasing interest in participatory arts experiences. It also may suggest that households with children have costs associated with youth arts education, such as music or dance lessons. Exhibit 30. Annual Household Spending on Arts and Culture Lessons, Classes, or Workshops in Edmonds Source: BERK, 2017. Exhibit 31. Annual Household Spending on Arts-Related Equipment, Supplies, or Materials in Edmonds Source: BERK, 2017. 46% 38% 43% 34% 41% 47% 20% 21% 10% 0%20%40%60%80%100% 0-34 35-64 65 and over $0. Less than $500. More than $500. 41% 43% 16% All responses 25% 28% 40% 61% 62% 53% 14% 10% 7% 0%20%40%60%80%100% 0-34 35-64 65 and over $0. Less than $500. More than $500. 31% 59% 10% All responses 5.3.a Packet Pg. 185 Attachment: Edmonds Arts and Culture 2017 Economic Impact Study 2018_0130 (Study of Economic Impacts of Arts and Culture) City of Edmonds | Arts and Culture 2017 Economic Impact Study 31 As show in Exhibit 32, music is the primary arts and cultural interest for both residents and visitors, followed by theater, festivals, and visual arts (inclusive of art museums and galleries). Exhibit 32. Primary Arts and Cultural Interests by Resident Status Source: BERK, 2017. There is little difference in the primary arts and culture interests of resident and visitor respondents. The largest difference is in literary arts, with visitors preferring it four percentage points more than residents, though this may reflect that the timing of the survey included participants from the literary conference, “Write on the Sound.” The alignment between residents and visitors in the array of arts interests suggests that there is no specific arts and culture offering that attracts residents or visitors alone, but rather the array of options and active cultural atmosphere. 8% 6% 13% 14% 6% 8% 22% 20% 5% 9% 15% 16% 13% 13% 12% 10% 6% 4% 0%20%40%60%80%100% Residents Non-residents Dance Festivals Heritage, including historical museums, exhibits, and eventsMusic Literary arts Theater Visual arts, including art museums and galleriesFilm/Movies Events for children or youth 5.3.a Packet Pg. 186 Attachment: Edmonds Arts and Culture 2017 Economic Impact Study 2018_0130 (Study of Economic Impacts of Arts and Culture) City of Edmonds | Arts and Culture 2017 Economic Impact Study 32 Because both Edmonds residents and arts attendees in Edmonds skew older (see Exhibit 4 and Exhibit 22), it is important that arts and culture businesses and organizations in Edmonds explore the interests of younger audiences and build a pipeline for future arts and culture participation. As displayed in Exhibit 33, younger respondents are primarily interested in music, film/movies, and theater. These three interests account for 50% of interests selected by people aged 0-34. Edmonds may have an opportunity to connect with and market to younger audiences by concentrating on these interests. Exhibit 33. Primary Arts and Culture Interests for Ages 0-34 Source: BERK, 2017. 6% 7% 7% 8% 10% 12% 13% 15% 22% 0%5%10%15%20%25% 0-34 Music Film/Movies Theater Visual arts, including art museums and galleries Festivals Dance Events for children or youth Heritage, including historical museums, exhibits, and events Literary arts 5.3.a Packet Pg. 187 Attachment: Edmonds Arts and Culture 2017 Economic Impact Study 2018_0130 (Study of Economic Impacts of Arts and Culture) City of Edmonds | Arts and Culture 2017 Economic Impact Study 33 Exhibit 34 shows attendance frequency by resident status and age. Interestingly, respondents who are visitors consistently show higher rates of attendance than residents, across all age groups. This suggests that there is market potential in reaching outside of Edmonds to neighboring communities’ arts and culture supporters. However, it also possible that high-attending arts and culture visitors are overrepresented through self-selection or survey promotion at events like Taste of Edmonds and the Arts Festival. Age breakdowns of attendance frequency in Exhibit 34 show that older respondents – both residents and visitors – attend arts and cultural events with greater frequency than younger respondents. These data may suggest that free time is what constrains arts and cultural event attendance for younger people. As people grow older and retire, they have more time to pursue their arts and cultural interests. Exhibit 34. Arts and Culture Events Attendance Frequency by Resident Status and Age Source: BERK, 2017. Note: Due to rounding, some percentages in the age breakdown do not add up to 100%. 50% 62% 59% 26% 26% 25% 24% 10% 17% 1% 0%20%40%60%80%100% 0-34 35-64 65 and over Once a month or more. Once a quarter. Once or twice a year. Never 55% 27% 17%1% All non-residents 42% 41% 52% 20% 38% 30% 37% 20% 17% 1% 1% 0%20%40%60%80%100% 0-34 35-64 65 and over Once a month or more. Once a quarter. Once or twice a year. Never All residents 52% 30% 17%1% 5.3.a Packet Pg. 188 Attachment: Edmonds Arts and Culture 2017 Economic Impact Study 2018_0130 (Study of Economic Impacts of Arts and Culture) City of Edmonds | Arts and Culture 2017 Economic Impact Study 34 As shown in Exhibit 35, respondents from Edmonds are more likely than visitors to have children under 18 living in their households. Thirty-five percent of resident respondents have children living at home, while 27% of visitor respondents report having children living at home. Exhibit 35. Respondents with Children Under 18 in the Household Source: BERK, 2017. Respondents were asked about their preferred communication method for news about arts and culture. As shown in Exhibit 36, digital communications, such as email, social media, and online news or calendars, are preferred by over 50% of residents and visitors. Both residents and visitors prefer email to hear about arts and culture events. After email, visitors prefer social media and online news or calendars. This differs from residents who, after email, prefer newspaper and social media. This presents an opportunity for Edmonds as digital communication, marketing, and promotion are often less expensive than communication outlets like TV and radio. Exhibit 36. Preferred Arts and Culture Communication Methods Source: BERK, 2017. 35% 27% 65% 73% 0%50%100% Resident Non-resident Yes No Non-resident Resident Email 31%25% Newspaper 13%20% Social Media 18%18% Online news or calendars 17%17% Posters and banners 9%13% TV or radio 4%3% Text notifications 2%3% Not interested 6%1% Total 100%100% 5.3.a Packet Pg. 189 Attachment: Edmonds Arts and Culture 2017 Economic Impact Study 2018_0130 (Study of Economic Impacts of Arts and Culture) City of Edmonds | Arts and Culture 2017 Economic Impact Study 35 Exhibit 37 and Exhibit 38 focus on personal identity for survey respondents. Across residents and visitors, Edmonds arts and culture events attract similar distributions of racial/ethnic and gender identities. Women constitute a much larger portion of survey respondents in both resident and visitor categories, and across all age groups. Exhibit 37. Personal Identity Categories Source: BERK, 2017. Exhibit 38. Gender Identity Categories Source: BERK, 2017. Non-resident Resident American Indian or Alaska Native 0%1% Asian 4%5% Black or African American 2%1% Hispanic, Latino, or Spanish origin 2%2% Middle Eastern or North African 0%1% Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander 1%1% White 86%84% Prefer not to answer 4%6% Total 100%100% 73% 75% 76% 27% 25% 24% 0%50%100% 0-34 35-64 65 and over Non-resident 76% 79% 72% 24% 21% 28% 0%50%100% 0-34 35-64 65 and over Resident Female Male 5.3.a Packet Pg. 190 Attachment: Edmonds Arts and Culture 2017 Economic Impact Study 2018_0130 (Study of Economic Impacts of Arts and Culture) City of Edmonds | Arts and Culture 2017 Economic Impact Study 36 Arts and Culture’s Economic Impacts and Community Benefits Building on what we have learned of the organizations that make up the Edmonds arts and culture sector, as well as the community members and visitors who partake in the variety of offerings they produce, this section seeks to summarize the quantifiable and non-quantifiable benefits this activity generates for the Edmonds community. The economic impact of the arts and culture sector is estimated using the Washington State I-O Model and other, non-quantifiable benefits are described through the stories and perspectives of residents and visitors. ECONOMIC IMPACT Edmonds arts organizations stimulate the local economy through direct employment and spending, related spending by community members and visitors who participate in arts and cultural events and activities, and spending by the individuals who make up the arts and culture employment base. By understanding the level of activity and spending associated with arts and culture offerings, we can estimate the ripple- on impacts, such as spending on lodging for artists; essential goods, supplies, and services; and visitor spending in local restaurants, bars, and shopping establishments. These patterns are described in economic impact parlance as direct, indirect, and induced spending. BERK estimated the economic impacts of the arts and culture in Edmonds using the Washington Input- Output Model (I-O Model), created and maintained by the Washington State Office of Financial Management. The I-O Model is a tool for assessing changes in demand on the Washington State economy. Economic impacts tend to concentrate near their origin and dissipate with distance. Because arts and cultural establishments draw visitors from outside the Edmonds community, they are particularly well- suited to bringing dollars into the economy. A portion of these dollars leave the community almost immediately, in the hands of out-of-town performers and suppliers, while another portion remains in Edmonds to be recirculated and grow the economy before leaking away. As an important first step in moving to this estimate, we needed to estimate revenues for all Edmonds- based arts and culture organizations, including those who did not respond to the Organization and Business Survey. The January 2018 Directory maintained by the Edmonds Arts Commission lists two public sector entities, 44 not-for-profit organizations or programs, and 57 businesses, totaling more than 100 arts and culture organizations in Edmonds. In comparison, two public sector entities, 22 not-for-profits, and seven businesses completed our survey. To account for the missing information from 22 not-for-profits and 50 businesses (Line B) in Exhibit 39, BERK projected revenues (B Rows) using the range of reported revenues from survey respondents (A Rows). C Rows show revenue estimates for the total arts and culture sector (Line C). Since there is uncertainty about the finances for non-responding organizations, BERK created three projections using the minimum, median, and maximum reported revenues for each organization type. These projections allowed BERK to estimate an overall minimum, median, and maximum total revenue for the arts and culture sector in Edmonds. Exhibit 39 shows the three estimates for the total arts and culture sector, building on the survey results captured in Exhibit 12. 5.3.a Packet Pg. 191 Attachment: Edmonds Arts and Culture 2017 Economic Impact Study 2018_0130 (Study of Economic Impacts of Arts and Culture) City of Edmonds | Arts and Culture 2017 Economic Impact Study 37 Exhibit 39. Estimated Total Gross Revenue for Edmonds Arts and Culture Organizations and Businesses Source: BERK, 2017. In Exhibit 40, the rounded Low, Medium, and High estimated revenues received by arts and culture organizations are considered the economic value that has been created and the input used for the I-O Model. When these economic values are fed into the I-O Model, the model provides three estimates: the total economic output, labor income, and employment expressed in full-time equivalents. Exhibit 40. Economic Output Projections for Edmonds Arts and Culture INPUTS OUTPUTS Range Estimated Revenue Economic Output Employment (FTE) Labor Income (INCLUDES DIRECT, INDIRECT, AND INDUCED) Low $10,180,000 $26,940,000 230 $8,940,000 Medium $19,600,000 $51,910,000 440 $17,230,000 High $49,230,000 $130,350,000 1,100 $43,260,000 Source: WA Office of Financial Management; BERK, 2017. Using the I-O Model, the minimum arts and culture revenue in Edmonds (Low Projection) generated more than $26 million annually, creating demand for the equivalent of 230 full-time jobs, and contributing to $8.9 million in labor income. This employment may be in the arts and culture sector, or in other sectors supported by spending in the arts sector, including local restaurants, shops, and service businesses. The maximum arts and culture revenue in Edmonds (High Projection) generated more than $130 million annually, creating demand for the equivalent of 1,100 full-time positions, and contributing to $43 million Public Sector Not-for-profit Businesses Total A Number of Survey Respondents 2 22 7 31 Revenue Reported 2,421,921$ 3,842,371$ 1,623,997$ 7,888,289$ Minimum 61,465$ 1,500$ 45,075$ Median 1,210,960$ 66,916$ 204,885$ Maximum 2,360,455$ 724,431$ 508,021$ B Number of Non-Respondents 22 50 72 Revenue Projections Minimum - 33,000$ 2,253,731$ Median - 1,472,149$ 10,244,231$ Maximum - 15,937,483$ 25,401,074$ C Total Arts and Culture Sector 2 44 57 103 Revenue Estimates Minimum 2,421,921$ 3,875,371$ 3,877,728$ 10,175,020$ Median 2,421,921$ 5,314,521$ 11,868,228$ 19,604,669$ Maximum 2,421,921$ 19,779,854$ 27,025,071$ 49,226,846$ 5.3.a Packet Pg. 192 Attachment: Edmonds Arts and Culture 2017 Economic Impact Study 2018_0130 (Study of Economic Impacts of Arts and Culture) City of Edmonds | Arts and Culture 2017 Economic Impact Study 38 in labor income. Given the large range and the variety of arts-related organizations, we assume the real economic impact is most likely in the medium range with about $50 million in economic output, 440 full- time job equivalents, and $17 million in labor income. Based on these estimates, arts and culture’s economic impact constitutes between 3% (Low Projection) to 16% (High Projection) of the Edmonds economy (2016 taxable retail sales, adjusted for inflation to 2017 dollars). If we exclude automobile sales (NAICS code 4411 – Automobile Dealers), which is Edmonds’ largest economic sector by far, and functions as part of the broader regional economy, arts and culture’s economic impact is or 4% (Low Projection) to 21% (High Projection) of the Edmonds economy. As described on the following page, the arts and culture sector supports a variety of businesses throughout Edmonds’ economy and serves both visitors who bring new spending into the community and local residents, creating impact that ripples through the regional economy. While this kind of purely economic stimulus could come from any sector, there are two important considerations that highlight the significance of the fact that in this case, the economic stimulus in question is generated by arts and culture organizations in particular: 1. The economic boost generated by Edmonds’ arts and culture organizations occurs without the negative impacts associated with many other industries, such as air pollution, big box development, or large parking lots. There are no arts and culture smokestacks or acres of parking requiring high-capacity roads. 2. In addition to its clean economic stimulus, the arts and culture sector contributes significantly to the quality of life in Edmonds and promotes a positive community identity in the region. Arts and culture bring residents together to watch, listen, participate, and engage with their neighbors. This strengthens the community, creates a sense of place, and in turn, attracts more residents, visitors, and businesses to Edmonds, which is seen in a positive way throughout the region. These significant, non- economic benefits are explored on page 40. 5.3.a Packet Pg. 193 Attachment: Edmonds Arts and Culture 2017 Economic Impact Study 2018_0130 (Study of Economic Impacts of Arts and Culture) City of Edmonds | Arts and Culture 2017 Economic Impact Study 39 HOW IT WORKS IN THE I-O MODEL In the I-O Model, the INPUT is ECA’s REVENUE, or the market value of what ECA produces. The model then projects the economic impacts, or OUTPUT. This initial direct spending by ECA creates a “direct impact" measured by ECONOMIC OUTPUT, EMPLOYMENT FTE and LABOR INCOME. The revenue Salt & Iron receives from the impact of ECA’s attendees is an “indirect impact,” meaning it is output that is attributed to ECA. Businesses connected to the arts sector have other indirect impacts measured in the I-O model as EMPLOYMENT FTE and LABOR INCOME. Increased revenues for unrelated industries in Edmonds are the “induced impacts” of the I-O Model. The model projects economic output from the spending “rippling” through the local economy. This leads to induced economic output by increasing goods and services sold and rising incomes. Understanding Arts and Culture’s Economic Impact: An Example Edmonds Center for the Arts is the largest arts and culture organization in Edmonds, and can provide a look at how arts and culture economic impact can be measured. ECA draws visitors to Edmonds for multidisciplinary programming, and has become more popular over its ten- plus years of operation. To offer programming that attracts visitors to the community, ECA hires staff to manage its operations, such as a performance director, accountants, and cashiers. Employees allow ECA to produce its shows, and in return they receive wages and employment, which also contribute to the local economy as they spend money. People who visit ECA for arts programming may look for more experiences nearby in the city, such as the historic downtown and waterfront. Visitors may spend additional money on local businesses that are connected to arts and culture, such as bars and restaurants. For example, someone may enjoy “dinner and a show” in Edmonds: they attend ECA and follow it up with dinner at nearby Salt & Iron. As a thriving business, Salt & Iron can hire more employees, increase hours, and pay better wages to its employees. As Salt & Iron grows, other businesses in the area will also prosper. Some visitors may stop in at the Red Twig for a pastry, and others may buy books at the Edmonds Bookshop. With rising economic prosperity and increased visitors, the local real estate agency may decide to expand its office and contract with a local construction company to build new offices. The real estate agency, through increased revenue from expansion, may now increase administrative personnel, who now manage a larger firm. Eventually a construction worker may walk through town, see an advertisement for a performance at ECA, and buy two tickets to a show. This action completes an economic cycle of spending, as ECA increases its revenues from the construction worker’s purchase. Through this cycle, ECA’s impact on the local economy is greater than the total market value of what it produces. 5.3.a Packet Pg. 194 Attachment: Edmonds Arts and Culture 2017 Economic Impact Study 2018_0130 (Study of Economic Impacts of Arts and Culture) City of Edmonds | Arts and Culture 2017 Economic Impact Study 40 COMMUNITY BENEFITS The arts and culture sector does more than support the Edmonds economy. It also helps define Edmonds as a distinctive and vibrant place, and serves to enhance the quality of life of residents. This section describes some of the other significant benefits of arts and culture, using the words and phrases from residents and visitors who experience it as gathered in the Story Collector. Quality of Life Quality of life is used to describe a standard of happiness or general well-being for a community. People in Edmonds describe arts and culture as one of those things they need or look for in quality of life. It’s what draws them to the community and makes Edmonds an appealing place to live. ▪ It’s wonderful to walk downtown and find a bustling business district, hear music, see inspiring art, and take the time to stroll the area and hunt for painted rocks. ▪ The arts elevate the entire community. It not only adds interest and beauty, but it also increases property values by making it a desirable place to live. ▪ I think people love the events and opportunities to enrich their hearts and souls through arts in Edmonds and use the experience to relax and visit Edmonds, perusing shops, and eating out. Community Image and Identity Arts and culture figure into how Edmonds is seen by the world (its image) and how the community views itself (its identity). Through arts and culture, residents engage with their neighbors, meet friends, and engage in the civic life. Arts and culture are what make Edmonds distinct from its neighboring communities; they keep it fresh and attractive. Statements from the Story Collector include: ▪ Edmonds’ arts and culture give it its charm and distinctive community. It is definitely one of the city’s assets. ▪ Arts are an incredibly important point of connection across generations in Edmonds, especially since arts in schools are so strong and opportunities for student performances are abundant. Arts and culture are the greatest catalyst for fostering a sense of community, especially in nurturing and encouraging future generations. It’s what Edmonds, in my mind, is most known for, and best at. ▪ My entire family participates in the arts, primarily music and theater. It is central to our family’s identity. ▪ Arts and culture are the core of how we spend our spare time. We just moved to downtown Edmonds and one primary reason is because of the strong focus on the arts. ▪ As a new resident, I volunteered with the [Edmonds Arts] Festival and immediately met new people, made friends, and became more involved in other community activities. As a result, I feel connected to the community. ▪ The arts are a huge part of what makes our suburb attractive. I’ve lived here four years and with the busy-ness of work and the time it takes to network, I feel like I’m only now starting to understand how many wonderful arts opportunities we have here, even beyond the bigger venues. 5.3.a Packet Pg. 195 Attachment: Edmonds Arts and Culture 2017 Economic Impact Study 2018_0130 (Study of Economic Impacts of Arts and Culture) City of Edmonds | Arts and Culture 2017 Economic Impact Study 41 Takeaways and Recommendations This study demonstrates that the arts and culture sector has a significant positive impact on the Edmonds economy as well as other significant benefits to quality of life and community image and identity. The Edmonds community has worked hard to enhance the arts and culture sector since the latest update of the Community Cultural Plan in 2014, and the City and community partners have made efforts to integrate the arts into the city’s physical infrastructure, planning, image, and brand identity. With such continued effort, the community benefits are likely to continue to be further amplified, building beneficial connections between Edmonds and the surrounding region, and between current and future residents, business owners, and visitors. The data presented in this report reveal opportunities for Edmonds to build on its arts and culture strengths and further enhance the economy and the community overall. While a comprehensive arts and culture-based economic development strategy might be generated in the future, this study and the key findings below focus on actionable items that relate directly to findings from organizational and community surveys. KEY FINDINGS The arts and culture cluster has a significant positive impact on Edmonds, generating an estimated $50 million a year and 440 full-time equivalent positions to the regional economy. Residents and visitors attending arts and culture events in Edmonds spend more money than just the cost of their admission. Leisure activities, such as dining and shopping, are a consistent and connected part of their participation in arts and culture activities. While ECA is an anchor attraction, people come to Edmonds for a variety of arts and cultural attractions, including public, not-for-profit, and for-profit organizations. This diversity in attractions gives the Edmonds arts and culture scene its strength. People living within a short travelling distance of downtown Edmonds, especially within a 30-minute drive, serve as Edmonds’ primary market. ▪ Attendees from within a 30-minute drive are a majority of the audience for Edmonds largest arts and culture organizations, specifically Edmonds Center for the Arts. ▪ Tourism from beyond a 30-minute drive represents a modest share for all survey respondents. Edmonds has a firm foundation of arts and culture attendees and participants, particularly among people 65 and older. 5.3.a Packet Pg. 196 Attachment: Edmonds Arts and Culture 2017 Economic Impact Study 2018_0130 (Study of Economic Impacts of Arts and Culture) City of Edmonds | Arts and Culture 2017 Economic Impact Study 42 RECOMMENDATIONS Strengthen the arts and culture sector citywide in economic development efforts. ▪ Embrace arts and culture as a core part of the Edmonds community identity citywide. Consider the entire city in implementing arts and culture strategies, especially along Highway 99 where there is greater racial and ethnic diversity, and increase the arts and culture network to include new, informal, and non-traditional entities. Integrate arts and culture’s contributions to the economy in new and existing community economic development efforts. ▪ Seek Creative District designation through the Washington State Arts Commission. A “creative district” is a hub for social and business activity that includes cultural facilities, creative industries, and arts-related businesses. Designation enhances Edmonds’ ability to pursue creative industry- related grants, better promote the community’s arts and culture-focused identity, recruit creative entrepreneurs, and increase tourism. ▪ Identify arts and culture businesses and stakeholders as a targeted economic cluster along with others identified in the City’s Economic Development Element. Explore connections to technology firms and other organizations in creative industries. ▪ Advocate for city infrastructure decisions that support arts and culture growth. Bring artists, business leaders, and entrepreneurs into current discussions to improve infrastructure that allows more options to experience Edmond’s arts and culture attractions. For example, efforts include the 4th Avenue Arts Corridor to build a better walking connection between the ECA, Civic Field, and Main Street. ▪ Cultivate a robust arts and culture sector with a healthy array of large and small entities and a diverse constellation of attractions. ▪ Identify a limited number of cornerstone arts events or disciplines that can grow to become key anchors of arts and culture in Edmonds. The importance of Edmonds Center for the Arts in the Edmonds cultural ecosystem as demonstrated by this report may help to set such a direction. ▪ Explore ways to support small organizations and businesses, as many of Edmonds arts and culture organizations employ less than five people, such as economic gardening and business mentoring. The stronger the constellation of arts and culture organizations, big and small, the stronger the entire network. ▪ Foster diverse offerings across artistic disciplines, through a variety of settings from formal to informal. It is the diversity of arts offerings that create a positive arts and culture identity in Edmonds, draws participation, and is valued by residents and visitors alike. Collaborate to attract target audiences. To maintain a pipeline of arts and culture supporters, it will be important to actively address the arts and culture interests of individuals under 40 and to reflect the region’s evolving demographics regarding race and ethnicity. ▪ Coordinate efforts, including programming and promotions, to create a critical mass of offerings 5.3.a Packet Pg. 197 Attachment: Edmonds Arts and Culture 2017 Economic Impact Study 2018_0130 (Study of Economic Impacts of Arts and Culture) City of Edmonds | Arts and Culture 2017 Economic Impact Study 43 for target audiences, bridging across multiple venues. ▪ Expand arts programming targeted to those under 40. Consider ways to link social and entertainment components, especially around food and drink, as well as family-friendly opportunities. ▪ Design advisory functions for civic, not-for-profit, and public entities that bring representatives of those under 40 and underrepresented populations into planning and decision-making. This is likely to look different than traditional board roles, and should accommodate the limited time availability of those under 40. Work across the community to develop positive visitor experiences. The economic value of arts and culture visitors is enhanced when they eat, drink, and shop locally, or when they stay overnight. These extended experiences work best when place-based features are coordinated with arts and culture “products.” ▪ Bundle dining/drinking, recreation, and lodging opportunities with arts and cultural experiences. Some of these packages can be tailored at specific target audiences (see item above). ▪ Make sure the logistics of visitor experiences are easy, with convenient parking, clear wayfinding, etc. Understand and address existing barriers and points of friction. ▪ Promote Edmonds’ parks and waterfront activities at arts and culture venues, activities, and events. Market Edmonds regionally and tier marketing investments and strategies. This study shows that residents and “day trippers” are the primary sources of economic impact related to arts and culture in Edmonds today. There remains potential to reach and effectively serve visitors beyond a 30-minute drive time, and to intentionally build tourism linked to arts and culture, but more research is needed. ▪ Prioritize marketing and promotion in the areas of North Seattle, Kingston, and Snohomish County, defined roughly by a 30-minute drive. Assess competition within that drive time area, and identify program niches likely to draw from those communities. Consider opportunities to serve as a satellite for Seattle arts and culture organizations, thereby minimizing the need to drive into downtown Seattle. ▪ Explore additional opportunities to attract out-of-area tourists. While this study indicates that Edmonds is not currently an overnight destination but a regional attraction, the value of overnight visitors may make investment in the tourist market worthwhile. Explore opportunities, including ways to better connect Edmonds arts and culture with the cruise industry. ▪ Continue work with Snohomish County and Washington State arts, recreation, and tourism entities to strengthen and promote Edmonds’s offerings. 5.3.a Packet Pg. 198 Attachment: Edmonds Arts and Culture 2017 Economic Impact Study 2018_0130 (Study of Economic Impacts of Arts and Culture) City of Edmonds | Arts and Culture 2017 Economic Impact Study 44 Bibliography Americans for the Arts. (2011). Source of Revenue for Nonprofit Arts Organizations. Retrieved from https://www.americansforthearts.org/sites/default/files/pdf/get_involved/advocacy/research/ 2011/revenuesources11.pdf Americans for the Arts. (2012). Arts and Economic Prosperity IV. A Project of Americans for the Arts. Americans for the Arts. (2016). Arts and Economic Prosperity 5. Retrieved from https://www.americansforthearts.org/by-program/reports-and-data/research-studies- publications/arts-economic-prosperity-5 Americans for the Arts. (2016). National Arts Index: An Annual Measure of the Vitality of Arts and Culture in the United States: 2002-2013. Retrieved from http://www.artsindexusa.org/2016-national- arts-index ArtsFund. (2014). An Economic Impact Study of Arts, Cultural, and Scientific Organizations in the Central Puget Sound Region. Binkley, C. (2017, April 16). At Luxury Stores, It Isn't Shopping - It's an Experience. Retrieved from The Wall Street Journal: https://www.wsj.com/articles/at-luxury-stores-it-isnt-shopping-its-an- experience-1492394460 Bureau of Economic Analysis. (2017). Retrieved from https://www.bea.gov/regional/arts-and- culture/index.cfm Hrywna, M. (2015). Earned Income Jumps for Nonprofits. The Nonprofit Times. Retrieved from http://www.thenonprofittimes.com/news-articles/27406/ Korek, B. (2017, April 11). Angie Kim's Cultural Capital. Retrieved from Surface Magazine: https://www.surfacemag.com/articles/art-center-for-cultural-innovation-arts-funding-in-los- angeles/ National Assembly of State Arts Agencies. (2018, January). Research: Funding. Retrieved from National Assembly of State Arts Agencies: https://nasaa-arts.org/research/funding/ National Center for Arts Research. (2017, October). Retrieved from At What Cost? How Distance Influences Arts Attendance: http://mcs.smu.edu/artsresearch2014/ncar-arts-activity Office of Financial Management Statewide Accounting. (2017, September). Per Diem Rates - As of October 1, 2017. Retrieved from https://www.ofm.wa.gov/sites/default/files/public/legacy/resources/travel/colormap1017.pdf 5.3.a Packet Pg. 199 Attachment: Edmonds Arts and Culture 2017 Economic Impact Study 2018_0130 (Study of Economic Impacts of Arts and Culture) City of Edmonds Arts and Culture 2017 Economic Impact Study Appendix | January 30, 2018 5.3.b Packet Pg. 200 Attachment: Appendix 2018_0130 (Study of Economic Impacts of Arts and Culture) City of Edmonds Arts and Culture 2017 Economic Impact Study Appendix Contents I. STAKEHOLDER INTERVIEW SUMMARY II. SURVEY INSTRUMENTS III. 2018 DIRECTORY OF ARTS AND CULTURE ORGANIZATIONS AND BUSINESSES 5.3.b Packet Pg. 201 Attachment: Appendix 2018_0130 (Study of Economic Impacts of Arts and Culture) I. Stakeholder Interview Summary 5.3.b Packet Pg. 202 Attachment: Appendix 2018_0130 (Study of Economic Impacts of Arts and Culture) June 1, 2017 1 Stakeholder Interview Summary INTRODUCTION The City of Edmonds is working with BERK Consulting to study the economic impacts of the arts and culture sector in the Edmonds community. To gain more insight into stakeholder interests in this project, and to raise community support for the effort, Claire Miccio and Frances Chapin conducted brief conversations with key partners, business owners, policymakers, and representatives from the arts and culture community. Interviews took place in City Hall on May 1, 2017. In-person interviews ▪ Scott Barnes, Edmonds School District Music and Art Manager, Jazz Connection ▪ Melanie Calderwood, Phoenix Theatre, with Debra Gettleman ▪ Valerie Claypool, Waterfront Festival, Rotary ▪ Denise Cole, Gallery owner, Art Walk board, artist ▪ Diane Cutts, Edmonds Arts Festival Association, President, with Julaine Fleetwood and Janet Jensen, EAF board members ▪ Lindsey Echelbarger, Cascadia Art Museum, founder, developer ▪ Tracy Felix, Art store, DEMA, artist ▪ Farrell Fleming, Senior Center, Exec Director ▪ Barbara Hawksford, Demiero Jazz Fest, former Snohomish County Arts Commission ▪ Janet Hawse, Gallery North, artist, and Catherine C., artist ▪ Kristiana Johnson, City Council Member ▪ Barbara Kindness, Sno-King Chorale, publishing ▪ Chris Lindberg, Jazz Connection, Rotary ▪ Bob McChesney, Port of Edmonds Exec. Director, Snohomish County Tourism board, Chamber board ▪ Mike Popke, Public Facilities District Board, Lynnwood Honda ▪ Wayne Purser, Realtor, Driftwood Players Board ▪ Steve Shelton, ECA Board, Barclay Shelton Dance School, Snohomish County PFD board ▪ Terry Vehrs, Edmonds Arts Festival Foundation, President, realtor ▪ Larry Vogel, Historic Preservation Commission, media (My Edmonds News) Email interviews ▪ Barb Fahey, former City of Edmonds Mayor, History Museum board member ▪ Katie Kelly, Director, Edmonds Historical Museum ▪ Jackson Loos, Hazel Miller Foundation board member ▪ Rick Steves, Rick Steves Europe INTERVIEW THEMES Summaries of responses heard during interviews are provided below, organized by theme. 5.3.b Packet Pg. 203 Attachment: Appendix 2018_0130 (Study of Economic Impacts of Arts and Culture) City of Edmonds | Arts and Culture Economic Impact Study – Stakeholder Interview Summary 2 Economic Roles Many stakeholders described direct and indirect economic contributions when asked about the role that arts and culture play in the Edmonds community. Stakeholders mentioned benefits associated with real estate, property taxes, tourism, arts and music education, retail, arts services, food service, and local jobs and volunteerism. ▪ “Art impacts real estate here. You make a desirable cultural atmosphere and you get higher prices. Art enhances economic value. People pay more to be part of an area that is proud. There is a premium for living in a community that has and values art.” ▪ “We rent the ECA and that money stays in the community. There’s concession income, etc. But our biggest impact is bringing parents and grandparents into the core of Edmonds. They use services – restaurants and galleries. We have a lot of kids – 300 to 400 a year. Add families to that and that’s a lot of people in the town on a recital night.” ▪ “Arts is a huge draw for this town and it impacts the local economy. I have 50 artists that I represent, primarily from the Northwest, and my biggest collector group is from Edmonds. We have sold millions of dollars of art over the years in the community.” ▪ “People like staying local and seeing shows. North Seattle, Bothell, Mukilteo – these folks all come to Edmonds for events and shows. People like to come here and take advantage of the performing arts and visit restaurants. There’s always something going on and it’s cool.” ▪ “Arts and culture are the reason why the Edmonds business economy has grown. And now I’m trying to convey to arts organizations and businesses that they need to partner more so they can grow further.” Some stakeholders talked about the unifying civic identity and “pride” that arts and culture provides the Edmonds community. ▪ “If a thief in the night came and took away all the arts and culture of this community, it would be a beautiful but very boring bedroom community. With arts and culture, we have a safe, vibrant downtown that the community can enjoy.” ▪ “Arts defines the personality of Edmonds. Art keeps vitality in the community.” ▪ “Edmonds has a history of embracing the arts. The Edmonds Arts Festival is one of the oldest festivals in the state. I remember going to it as a child and seeing demonstrations because it took over the streets. It was all kinds of arts and I was just so excited by all of it. To this day I can remember the songs that were sung.” ▪ “Art of quality enhances the town and the community. When you’re walking around, it surprises you and it adds texture. I look for art that moves me and we are getting that around here. Art on the streets is the kind of thing that makes you stick around, buy an ice cream cone, and be a part of a community.” Opportunities for Enhancement Many stakeholders were interested in continued and/or greater support and coordination from the City in enhancing the arts and culture sector and facilitating partnerships among members of the public, private, and nonprofit sectors. ▪ “The City should be the coordinator and a resource and provide oversight and ideas on how to promote 5.3.b Packet Pg. 204 Attachment: Appendix 2018_0130 (Study of Economic Impacts of Arts and Culture) City of Edmonds | Arts and Culture Economic Impact Study – Stakeholder Interview Summary 3 our arts community - everybody has these ideas and we don't get together to go after the same vision.” ▪ “I would like to know about who is interested in collaborating. I think it's much easier to collaborate or partner than going about it yourself. If we knew who was interested in what, we could partner together.” ▪ “I would like there to be some way connect the minds of business owners that the people coming into their door were drawn to Edmonds were drawn to the arts. The people who came here came because of the arts. That could provide leverage.” ▪ “It’s a shame that the Chamber Arts and Culture awards ended. That event brought awareness of the arts into the community. It got out to the residents who don’t follow the arts. Maybe this is something the Rotary could collaborate on.” A few stakeholders were unaware of the arts and culture organization inventory the City maintains. ▪ “There are a lot of arts groups in town who we don't know much about at all. An overview of the organizations, communications with mission and a broad description of programs in a directory. And maybe a contact. That would be helpful.” One common suggestion for enhancing the arts and culture sector to support the local economy is to invest in children and families as the future of arts patronage. Stakeholders mentioned the need to continue and build on student learning about music, theater, and art, and to draw youth and families into Edmonds with diverse arts and culture offerings. ▪ “If we invest in students, we invest in the future of arts and culture. Building the audiences is investing in students learning about music, theater, art as kids and as students. We haven't done a good job of bringing in new audiences. I see this as a real key of bringing in the next generation and economic growth opportunities.” ▪ “As Edmonds starts to change from an older community, it'd be fun to see how we can make things more interesting for young families. Concerts at the Park is focused on older group.” Some stakeholders suggested expanding arts and culture offerings to neighborhoods outside of downtown Edmonds. ▪ “Westgate, Firdale Village, the Hwy 99 International District: How does the City put stuff up there to do cultural events? We need a gathering place. We do a lot of things down in downtown because that's where the infrastructure is. We need to expand to that area up there - where is a meeting or gathering place up there that could expand up in the Hwy 99 corridor?” ▪ “We should include Hwy 99 in our investments, and add more mainstream arts so people can see how art fits into their life. The arts have a reputation for being for those with education and money.” ▪ “I want to know if there are ways to bring low-income or disadvantaged families and children into the arts and culture community. We want people who are already interested in art but I want to reach out to all parts of our community. Community education and outreach, for example to the Hwy 99 corridor.” Hopes for the Impact Study Many stakeholders want to learn all they can about arts patrons in Edmonds. They are especially interested in understanding: ▪ Willingness to pay at different age ranges, 5.3.b Packet Pg. 205 Attachment: Appendix 2018_0130 (Study of Economic Impacts of Arts and Culture) City of Edmonds | Arts and Culture Economic Impact Study – Stakeholder Interview Summary 4 ▪ Preferences for arts and cultural offerings, ▪ Preferred communication methods, and ▪ Barriers to attendance (e.g. parking). Some stakeholders talked about how understanding of the economic impact of arts and culture in the City have been largely anecdotal to date. They hope this study would provide clarity on the economic contributions of arts and culture in Edmonds and be communicated widely. Stakeholders mentioned the difficulty of measuring and communicating something that they feel to be true – that an active arts and culture atmosphere drive the local economy – but don’t have evidence to support. ▪ “I would like to learn more about the economic multipliers - does everyone go out to dinner after or before? Is it just downtown Edmonds that we're talking about - are the arts just downtown or are we talking about our whole community?” ▪ “I want baseline data, quantitative and qualitative. I hope the study shows that arts and culture contribute to the local economy, and help us be a sustainable city in spirit and soul.” ▪ “I hope it will provide information about the extent to which arts are an economic driver of the arts. It's both a blatant and subtle thing and a frustration. It's a culture and there are a lot of people who benefit.” ▪ “In our gut, we know this is a unique community and we know that what we have is a fragile thing and it needs to be safeguarded. And fertilized to grow! We do a lot but there is a lot we can do to be better in supporting arts and culture.” ▪ “We need it to advocate and show the City where they need to invest and support more arts in the downtown. Lodging tax money is only collected from one Edmonds hotel.” ▪ “In the nonprofits, we are looking for money. We need to be able to tell the story about how much the arts mean to the community. I hope it gives us something to use and point at in talking to City council, funders, or applying for grants.” 5.3.b Packet Pg. 206 Attachment: Appendix 2018_0130 (Study of Economic Impacts of Arts and Culture) II. Survey Instruments 5.3.b Packet Pg. 207 Attachment: Appendix 2018_0130 (Study of Economic Impacts of Arts and Culture) On behalf of the City of Edmonds, BERK Consulting is surveying arts-related organizations and businesses in Edmonds to understand how arts and culture contributes to the community's economy. Thank you for participating! No proprietary data will be shared with others. Organizations that participate will receive a copy of the summary report. If you have questions, please contact: Claire Miccio claire@berkconsulting.com 206-493-2371 Welcome! Thanks for your interest. Edmonds Arts & Culture Organization Survey 5.3.b Packet Pg. 208 Attachment: Appendix 2018_0130 (Study of Economic Impacts of Arts and Culture) Contact Information Edmonds Arts & Culture Organization Survey 1. What is the name of your organization or business? 2. Who is the best contact at your organization or business for us to follow up with if we have questions? 3. Please provide a phone number or email address for the contact above. 5.3.b Packet Pg. 209 Attachment: Appendix 2018_0130 (Study of Economic Impacts of Arts and Culture) Basic Organizational Information Edmonds Arts & Culture Organization Survey 4. What is your organization's or business's primary arts-related role? Presenting/producing performing arts Museum/heritage Arts classes, workshops, conferences Arts/cultural festivals Sales of works of art (visual, literary, etc.) Sales of arts supplies and materials Services to the arts and artists Other (please specify) 5. Which of the following best describes your organization's or business's primary arts focus? Please choose the one category that best fits. Arts education Dance Festival/market Heritage Music Theater Visual arts Film/media Multidisciplinary Literary arts Other (please specify) 5.3.b Packet Pg. 210 Attachment: Appendix 2018_0130 (Study of Economic Impacts of Arts and Culture) 6. What kind of entity is your organization or business? Public sector agency Not-for-profit For-profit 5.3.b Packet Pg. 211 Attachment: Appendix 2018_0130 (Study of Economic Impacts of Arts and Culture) Employees and Volunteers Edmonds Arts & Culture Organization Survey 7. What is the last fiscal year for which you can share information? Full-time Part-time Contract 8. For the fiscal year you are reporting on, how many positions do you employ? 9. For not-for-profits: How many volunteers worked with your organization, including Board members and other volunteers) in the last fiscal year? 10. For not-for-profits: How many total volunteer hours were donated? 5.3.b Packet Pg. 212 Attachment: Appendix 2018_0130 (Study of Economic Impacts of Arts and Culture) Attendees or Customers Edmonds Arts & Culture Organization Survey 11. Approximately how many people visited your arts-related venue or participated in your arts-related activities in the fiscal year you are reporting on or in the last 12 months? the City of Edmonds Outside the City of Edmonds, but within 50 miles More than 50 miles away 12. (See map below) To the best of your knowledge, approximately what percentage of your attendees or customers live in: Map of 50-mile radius 18 years old or younger 19 years old to 40 years old Older than 40 years old 13. Approximately what percentage of attendees or customers are: 5.3.b Packet Pg. 213 Attachment: Appendix 2018_0130 (Study of Economic Impacts of Arts and Culture) Overnight Stays Edmonds Arts & Culture Organization Survey 14. Do you arrange or suggest accommodations for artists, performers, crew, and vendors to stay in Edmonds? Yes No Not applicable to my organization 15. If yes, how many total nights in the last fiscal year? 16. Where did they stay? Check all that apply. In paid lodging outside of Edmonds. In paid lodging in Edmonds. Other (please specify) 5.3.b Packet Pg. 214 Attachment: Appendix 2018_0130 (Study of Economic Impacts of Arts and Culture) Your information will help us understand the economic impact of arts and culture in Edmonds. No proprietary data will be published. Answer what you can, as best you can. Estimates are okay! You can contact claire@berkconsulting.com if you have questions. Financial Information Edmonds Arts & Culture Organization Survey 17. For the fiscal year you are reporting on, what was your total gross revenue? Earned income (ticket and merchandise sales, tuition, etc.) Contributed income (this most likely applies to non-profits or public organizations. Examples include: financial contributions, donated goods or services, grants, donations, etc.) 18. What percentage of your revenues came from the following categories? Your answers should sum to 100. Box office/admissions (includes memberships) Tuition/workshops Sales (includes merchandise, concessions, artwork) Facility rentals Other 19. With regard to your earned income, approximately what percentage comes from the following categories? Your answer should sum to 100. 5.3.b Packet Pg. 215 Attachment: Appendix 2018_0130 (Study of Economic Impacts of Arts and Culture) Government funding or grants (State, County, or City) Foundation funding Corporate gifts (financial contributions, employee matches, and donated goods or services) Individuals (financial contributions and donated goods or services) Other 20. With regard to your contributed income, approximately what percentage comes from the following categories? Your answers should sum to 100. 21. For the the fiscal year you are describing, what were your total operating expenditures? Personnel (salaries and benefits for full or part-time employees) Mortgage or rent (including facility space, office space, and any additional venue rentals) Equipment costs (purchase or rental fees) Cost of production and/or goods sold (artist/performance fees, wholesale cost of goods, rights fees, etc.) Marketing (advertising, printing, graphics, etc.) Professional services (accounting, auditing, legal fees, etc.) Taxes Other 22. Approximately what percentage of your operating expenditures were in each of the following categories? Please do not include donated goods or services. Your answer should sum to 100. 5.3.b Packet Pg. 216 Attachment: Appendix 2018_0130 (Study of Economic Impacts of Arts and Culture) 23. How much did you spend on capital improvements (e.g. new facilities or physical improvements) in the fiscal year you are reporting on? 24. Is there anything else you want to share with us? 5.3.b Packet Pg. 217 Attachment: Appendix 2018_0130 (Study of Economic Impacts of Arts and Culture) This survey will inform a study of how arts and culture impact Edmonds. Welcome! Edmonds Community & Visitor Survey 1. Do you live in Edmonds? (This question is required so we can ask the right follow-up questions.) * Yes No 2. What is your home ZIP code? 5.3.b Packet Pg. 218 Attachment: Appendix 2018_0130 (Study of Economic Impacts of Arts and Culture) Visitors Edmonds Community & Visitor Survey Please answer these questions with your current or most recent trip to Edmonds in mind. 3. Where did you (or will you) stay overnight in connection with your visit to Edmonds? I am not staying overnight. With friends or family. In paid lodging in Edmonds. In paid lodging outside of Edmonds. Other (please specify) 4. Which of the following did you (or will you) do while in Edmonds? Check all that apply. Eat a meal. Have a drink or snack. Buy something. Visit the waterfront or a park. 5. Does today’s visit (or your most recent trip to Edmonds) involve an arts or cultural activity, such as an event, performance, exhibition, class or an art-related business? No. Yes, but it was not the most important reason for the trip. Yes, it was the most important reason for the trip. 5.3.b Packet Pg. 219 Attachment: Appendix 2018_0130 (Study of Economic Impacts of Arts and Culture) Edmonds Residents Edmonds Community & Visitor Survey 6. In the last 12 months, roughly how much did your household spend on tickets for arts and cultural events or works of art in Edmonds? $0. Less than $500. Between $500 and $1,000. More than $1,000. 7. In the last 12 months, roughly how much did your household spend on arts and culture lessons, classes, or workshops in Edmonds? $0. Less than $500. More than $500. 8. In the last 12 months, roughly how much did your household spend on arts-related equipment, supplies, or materials in Edmonds? $0. Less than $500. More than $500. 5.3.b Packet Pg. 220 Attachment: Appendix 2018_0130 (Study of Economic Impacts of Arts and Culture) Your Interests Edmonds Community & Visitor Survey 9. What are your primary arts and cultural interests? Choose your top 3. Dance Festivals Heritage, including historical museums, exhibits, and events Music Literary arts Theater Visual arts, including art museums and galleries Film/Movies Events for children or youth 10. How often do you attend arts and culture events or activities? Never Once or twice a year Once a quarter Once a month Once a week Multiple times a week 11. Is there someone under 18 living in your household? Yes No 5.3.b Packet Pg. 221 Attachment: Appendix 2018_0130 (Study of Economic Impacts of Arts and Culture) 12. How would you like to hear about arts and culture activities in Edmonds in the future? Choose your top 2. Email Newspaper Online news or calendars Social Media Text notifications Posters and banners TV or radio Not interested 13. What is your age? Under 18 years old 18-24 years old 25-34 years old 35-44 years old 45-54 years old 55-64 years old 65-74 years old 75 years or older Prefer not to answer 14. Which of these categories describe you? Black or African American American Indian or Alaska Native Middle Eastern or North African Hispanic, Latino, or Spanish origin Asian White Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander Prefer not to answer 5.3.b Packet Pg. 222 Attachment: Appendix 2018_0130 (Study of Economic Impacts of Arts and Culture) 15. To which gender do you most identify? Male Female Transgender Prefer not to answer 16. If you would like to receive the City of Edmonds Quarterly Arts e-Newsletter, please enter your email address below. 17. Thank you for all your input! If you would like to enter a drawing for free tickets, please enter your email address below: 5.3.b Packet Pg. 223 Attachment: Appendix 2018_0130 (Study of Economic Impacts of Arts and Culture) Welcome! We want to hear your story. Edmonds Arts & Culture Story Collector 1. What role do arts or cultural experiences in Edmonds play in your or your family's life? 2. What impact do you think arts and culture have on the business sector in Edmonds? 3. How do arts and culture create a sense of community in Edmonds? Please share with us an example! 5.3.b Packet Pg. 224 Attachment: Appendix 2018_0130 (Study of Economic Impacts of Arts and Culture) III. 2018 Directory of Arts and Culture Organizations and Businesses 5.3.b Packet Pg. 225 Attachment: Appendix 2018_0130 (Study of Economic Impacts of Arts and Culture) City of Edmonds | 2018 Directory of Arts Organizations and Businesses Last Revised 1/30/2018 CODE NAME TYPE CONTACT EMAIL AREA WEBSITE NP Academy of Music NW (located in Bothell)Not-for-profit Jim Paul, President info@amnw.org Performing www.amnw.org B All Wound Up Yarn Shop Business Leslie Greenquist info@allwoundupyarnshop.com Visual https://www.allwoundupyarnshop.com/ B Alley Bell Music Business Sarah Richàrd alleybellmusic@gmail.com Music Education http://www.alleybellmusic.com/ B Ananda Piano Studio Business B Angela Michael Music Instruction B Aria Studio Gallery Business Joan Archer joanearcher@yahoo.com Visual www.joanarchergallery.com NP Art Start Northwest (Graphite)Not-for-profit Mary Olsen/ Tracy Felix msiegall@comcast.net Visual +https://www.facebook.com/ArtStartNorthwest/ NP Art Walk Edmonds Not-for-profit Rachel Dobbins info@artwalkedmonds.com Visual/Performing www.edmondsartwalk.com NP-CLUB Artists Connect (EAF affiliation thru ArtWorks)Not-for-profit webmistress@artists-connect.com Visual www.artists-connect.com B ARTspot Business Tracy Felix ARTspotEdmonds@gmail.com Visual www.artspot.squarespace.com NP ArtWorks (affiliated with EAFF and EAF)Not-for-profit Meredith Arnold meredith@artworks-edmonds.org Visual www.artworks-edmonds.org B Austin Harp Arts Business Alison Austin alison@austinharparts.com Performing http://www.austinharparts.com/ B Barclay Shelton Dance Centre Business Leanne Shelton,barclayshelton@gmail.com Performing www.barclaysheltondance.com NP Cascade Symphony Orchestra Not-for-profit Roberta McBride, president@cascadesymphony.org Performing www.cascadesymphony.org NP Cascadia Art Museum (CAM)Not-for-profit Lindsey Echelbarger director@cascadiaartmuseum.org Visual www.cascadiaartmuseum.org B C'est la Vie Business Colleen Bowman colleen.bowman@clvcatalog.com Visual www.clvcatalog.com B Christopher Framing & Gallery Business Michael Christopher michael@christopherframing.com Visual www.christopherframing.com NP-GOV City of Edmonds - Edmonds Arts Commission (EAC) / Write on the Sound writers' conference founded 1986 - other City Commissions Not-for-profit Frances Chapin, Arts Manager eac@edmondswa.gov; wots@edmondswa.gov patrick.doherty@edmondswa.gov diane.cunningham@edmondswa.gov carolyn.lafave@edmondswa.gov All www.edmondsartscommission.org; http://www.edmondswa.gov/diversity- commission-home.html; http://www.edmondswa.gov/historic- preservation-commission-15.html; http://www.edmondswa.gov/sister-city- commission.html B Cline Jewelers Business Andy Cline andy@clinejewelers.com Visual www.clinejewelers.com B Cole Gallery, Cole Contemporary, Cole Art Studio Business Denise Cole info@colegallery.net Visual www.colegallery.net www.coleartstudio.comBComstock Jewelers Business Brian Comstock info@comstockjewelers.com Visual www.comstockjewelers.com B Dark Stream Records Business Scott Lindenmuth info@scottlindenmuth.com Performing http://www.darkstreamrecords.com/ B Dayton Street Studio Business B Destination Music Business B Driftwood Modern Business Hannah Alex-Glasser driftwoodmodern@gmail.com Visual www.driftwoodmodern.com 4-EDUC EDCC Community Education Not-for-profit Mary Heffernan,mary.heffernan@edcc.edu http://www.campusce.net/edmondsarts/Category/category.aspx NP Edmonds Art Studio Tour (affiliated with EAF)Not-for-profit Nancy Thompson/tinamarohn@gmail.com Visual www.edmondsartstudiotour.com NP Edmonds Arts Festival Not-for-profit Diane Cutts, President twocutts@comcast.net Visual/Performing www.edmondsartsfestival.com NP Edmonds Arts Festival Foundation Not-for-profit Terry Vehrs, President vehrs@windermere.com Visual www.eaffoundation.org B Edmonds Bookshop Business Mary Kay Sneeringer edmondsbookshop@msn.com Literary www.edmondsbookshop.com B Edmonds Cello Studio Business NP-GOV Edmonds Center for the Arts/Edmonds Public Facilities Not-for-profit Joe McIalwain,joe@ec4arts.org Performing www.edmondscenterforthearts.org NP Edmonds Chamber of Commerce Not-for-profit Greg Urban, Ex. Dir.greg@edmondswa.com Festival/Market http://www.edmondswa.com/ NP Edmonds Driftwood Players Not-for-profit Kim Smith/ Ted Jaquith, President office@edmondsdriftwoodplayers.org Performing www.edmondsdriftwoodplayers.org * This Directory is a living document. Organizations, programs, and businesses are added to the Directory as the City identifies them and/or as they contact the City. 5.3.b Packet Pg. 226 Attachment: Appendix 2018_0130 (Study of Economic Impacts of Arts and Culture) City of Edmonds | 2018 Directory of Arts Organizations and Businesses Last Revised 1/30/2018 CODE NAME TYPE CONTACT EMAIL AREA WEBSITE NP-CLUB Edmonds Floretum Garden Club Not-for-profit Tia Scarce digdig@mac.com Floral www.edmondsfloretumgardenclub.org B Edmonds Frame Design & Atelier Business Barbara Hege Mercer bhmatelier@gmail.com Visual www.edmondsframe.com NP Edmonds Historical Museum Not-for-profit Caitin Kelly, Director director@historicedmonds.org Heritage +www.historicedmonds.org NP Edmonds In Bloom Not-for-profit Jeanne Thorsen information@edmondsinbloom.com Floral www.edmondsinbloom.com NP Edmonds Jazz Connection/ Rotary Club Edmonds Daybreakers Not-for-profit Christian Lindberg clindberg9568@gmail.com Performing www.jazzconnection.org NP Edmonds Phoenix Theatre Not-for-profit Melanie Calderwood/ Debra Rich Gettleman phoenixtheatreinfo@gmail.com Performing www.tptedmonds.org NP Edmonds Rotary Club Not-for-profit Valerie Claypool 247eventsnw@gmail.com Museum/Heritage https://www.edmondsrotary.com/ NP-EDUC Edmonds School District Visual and Performing Arts Not-for-profit Scott Barnes, Manager Barb Childs, Barnessc@edmonds.wednet.edu Arts Education www.edmonds.wednet.edu NP Edmonds Sno-Isle Library Not-for-profit Richard Suico, Library Manager rsuico@sno-isle.org Literary/Ed www.sno-isle.org/locations/edmonds B Elegant Gems Business NP EPIC Group Writers Not-for-profit Judith Works epic@epicgroupwriters.com Literary www.epicgroupwriters.com NP-EDUC ESD Edmonds Comedy Night Not-for-profit edmondscomedynight@gmail.com Performing www.edmondscomedynight.com NP-EDUC ESD Edmonds Heights Not-for-profit Performing NP-EDUC ESD EDWHS Jazz Colony Not-for-profit Pete Bennett pete@bennett-bennett.com Performing http://jazzcolony.blogspot.com/ NP-EDUC ESD SeaJazz Not-for-profit ESD and Port of Edmonds bmcchesney@portofedmonds.org Performing www.portofedmonds.org B Fabric of Life Business Carol Shillios http://fabricoflifeboutique.tumblr.com/about NP Frank Demiero Jazz Festival Not-for-profit Frank DeMiero frank@smpjazz.com Performing www.demierojazzfest.org NP Friends of the Edmonds Library Not-for-profit Luke Distelhorst edmondslibfriends@gmail.com Literary http://edmondslibraryfriends.org/ B Gallery North Business/Coop gallerynorth@yahoo.com Visual www.gallery-north.com B Garden Gear and Gallery Business Lili Hall sales@garden-gear.com Visual www.garden-gear.com B Gentryart Business B Glazed and Amazed Business Judy Salinas judyjudyjudy80@hotmail.com Visual http://glazedandamazed.com B Hamilton Music Instruction B J. Rankin Jewellers Business John Rankin john@jrankinjewelers.com Visual www.jrankinjewelers.com B Jam Town Instruments Business B Jon Inge Fine Art Photography Business B Kirkendall-Spring Photographers Business photoks@frontier.com Visual www.kirkendall-spring.photoshelter.com B Leap Frog Entertainment Business Rob Stuverud bookings@leapfrog-entertainment.com Performing http://leapfrog-entertainment.com/ B LHM Design Business B Lowell's Stained Glass Business Paul Lowell pklowell@juno.com Visual https://lowellsstainedglassstudio.wordpress.com B MaJe Gallery Business Manya Vee manya@majegallery.com Visual www.majegallery.com B Malya Muth, Singing Teacher Business Malya Muth info@nwvocalarts.com Performing www.NWvocalArts.com NP Maplewood Rock and Gem Club Not-for-profit Mary Ann Collins info@maplewoodrockclub.com Visual www.maplewoodrockclub.com * This Directory is a living document. Organizations, programs, and businesses are added to the Directory as the City identifies them and/or as they contact the City. 5.3.b Packet Pg. 227 Attachment: Appendix 2018_0130 (Study of Economic Impacts of Arts and Culture) City of Edmonds | 2018 Directory of Arts Organizations and Businesses Last Revised 1/30/2018 CODE NAME TYPE CONTACT EMAIL AREA WEBSITE NP Mosaic Arts Choir, North Sound Church Not-for-profit Allan Skoog allans@northsoundchurch.com Performing https://northsoundchurch.com B Mural Works Business Andy Eccleshall ajeccleshall@gmail.com Visual www.muralworks.com B My Sister's Place Needle Arts Business B Northwest Music Instruction & Guild Business NP Northwest Scottish Fiddlers Not-for-profit Marcia Thumma m.thumma@mac.com Performing www.nwscottishfiddlers.org B Olympic Ballet School Business Oleg Gorboulev/ Mara Vinson oleg@olympicballet.com Performing www.olympicballet.com NP Olympic Ballet Theatre Not-for-profit Oleg Gorboulev/ Mara Vinson oleg@olympicballet.com Performing www.olympicballet.com B Opticus Media Corporation Business Victoria and Cal Lewin cal@ofcstudio.com Visual/media http://www.opticusmedia.com B Otherworlds Business Ahren Paulson otherworldsstore@gmail.com Visual http://www.otherworldsstore.com/ B Pilgrim Media Services Business Chris Glanister chrisg@pilgrimmediasvcs.com Media www.pilgrimmediasvcs.com NP-CLUB Puget Sound Camera Club Not-for-profit Lauren Heerschap info@pugetsoundcamera.com Visual www.pugetsoundcamera.com NP Puget Sound Traditional Jazz Society Not-for-profit Carol Rippey jazzdancer2@msn.com Performing https://pstjs.org/ NP-CLUB Quilters Anonymous (Edmonds group)Not-for-profit info@quiltersanonymous.org Visual www.quiltersanonymous.org B Randall J Hodges Photography Business Randall J Hodges randall@randalljhodges.com Visual www.randalljhodges.com B Raspberry Records Business B Ray's Music Instruction Business B Re-Juiced Studio Business Candace Gaul candy@re-juiced.com Visual www.re-juiced.com NP Sacred Rocks Center for Learning & Arts Not-for-profit NP Sculptor's Workshop Not-for-profit Julie Perrine perrine3@comcast.net Visual https://www.facebook.com/sculptorsworkshopofedmonds/ B Seattle Jazz Singers Business Frank DeMiero frank@smpjazz.com Performing www.seattlejazzsingers.com NP Seaview Weavers & Fine Arts Guild Not-for-profit Heather McGilvray hmcgilvra@comcast.net Visual www.seaviewweavers.wordpress.com NP Sno-King Community Chorale Not-for-profit Frank DeMiero 2006@sno-kingchorale.org Performing www.sno-kingchorale.org B Something Special Press Business Jim Ballard jimballard@mac.com Visual NP South County Senior Center/ Edmonds Senior Center Not-for-profit Farrell Fleming execdirector@scscedmonds.org All www.scscedmonds.org B Spangler Books Business James Spangler Literary www.spanglerbookexch.com NP Steel Magic Northwest Not-for-profit Gary Gibson director@steelmagicnorthwest.org Performing www.steelmagicnorthwest.org B Studio Mackie B Super Books Business Joanne Nelson superbooks@superbooks.net Literary www.superbooks.net B Suzuki Violin School Business NP Swamp Creek and Western Railroad Not-for-profit Heritage www.scwrra.org * This Directory is a living document. Organizations, programs, and businesses are added to the Directory as the City identifies them and/or as they contact the City. 5.3.b Packet Pg. 228 Attachment: Appendix 2018_0130 (Study of Economic Impacts of Arts and Culture) City of Edmonds | 2018 Directory of Arts Organizations and Businesses Last Revised 1/30/2018 CODE NAME TYPE CONTACT EMAIL AREA WEBSITE NP The Cogworks Not-for-profit Kirk Siqveland kirk@thecogworks.org Visual & Media Arts www.thecogworks.org B The Edmonds Theater Business Chris Mayes theEdmondsTheaterWA@gmail.com Film www.theedmondstheater.com B Tovar Arts B Two Crows Studio NP Write On Calligraphers Not-for-profit Marita Sheehan info@writeoncalligraphers.org Visual www.writeoncalligraphers.org B Zinc Art + Object Business Laura Zeck laura@ZincArtObject.com Visual www.zincartobject.com * This Directory is a living document. Organizations, programs, and businesses are added to the Directory as the City identifies them and/or as they contact the City. 5.3.b Packet Pg. 229 Attachment: Appendix 2018_0130 (Study of Economic Impacts of Arts and Culture) ARTS & CULTURE ARTS & CULTURE 2017 ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY edmonds Arts and culture support Edmonds’ economic health and community vibrancy while strengthening the community’s regional image. There are at least 100 arts-related organizations, programs, and businesses in Edmonds, serving a range of residents and visitors. This study summarizes the economic contributions of the arts and culture sector in Edmonds using survey and interview data collected from May to October 2017. CITY OF EDMONDS January 30, 2018 Visit www.edmondswa.gov for the full report or more information. 5.3.c Packet Pg. 230 Attachment: Communication Handout 2018_0130 (Study of Economic Impacts of Arts and Culture) “ I think people love the events and opportunities to enrich their hearts and souls through arts in Edmonds. They the opportunity to relax and visit Edmonds, perusing shops, and eating out. — Survey Participant “ The arts elevate the entire community. It adds interest and beauty, and increases property values by making Edmonds a desirable place to live. — Survey Participant “ North Seattle, Bothell, Mukilteo—these folks all come to Edmonds for events and shows. People like to come here and take advantage of the performing arts and visit restaurants. There’s always something going on in Edmonds. — Study Participant Edmonds’ Arts & Culture Sector is an ECONOMIC CATALYST. Edmonds’ arts and culture sector serves residents and visitors who bring new spending into the community, creating an economic stimulus that ripples through the regional economy. The economic boost generated by Edmonds’ arts and culture organizations occurs in a clean manner, without the negative impacts associated with other industries such as air pollution or large development out of scale with the Edmonds Downtown. This economic activity creates community amenities that enhance QUALITY OF LIFE. Arts and culture help make Edmonds an attractive place to live, along with its beautiful setting on the Sound, well-maintained parks, and walkable downtown full of restaurants and shops. This accessible vibrancy is essential to the high quality of life enjoyed by Edmonds residents. Arts and culture’s positive impacts are central to Edmonds’ COMMUNITY IDENTITY & ATTRACTIVE IMAGE. Edmonds’ arts and culture sector brings residents together to watch, listen, participate, or volunteer in the arts. This strengthens the community, creates a sense of place, and promotes a positive image of Edmonds in the region. This positive image attracts residents, visitors, and businesses to Edmonds, all of whom could choose to go elsewhere. In turn, these residents, visitors, businesses stimulate Edmonds’ economy, increase quality of life, and bolster Edmonds’ identity and image, feeding a virtuous cycle. Edmonds’ Arts & Culture Sector Estimated $19 million revenues in 2016. Economic Impact About $50 million, the equivalent of 440 full-time jobs, and $17 million in labor income. REVENUES IMPACT JOBS & LABORINCOME »Edmonds Center for the Arts (ECA) draws nearly 50,000 visitors a year. »Some ECA visitors enjoy drinks and a meal at a restaurant, such as Salt & Iron. With this additional patronage, Salt & Iron increases hours, hires more employees, and pays higher wages. »ECA also hires additional staff to maintain their high-quality programming. These workers live in or nearby Edmonds and spend some of their salaries in local businesses. Understanding the Ripple Effect These figures represent total impact, with much of the benefit received by Edmonds and the surrounding region. Here’s an example of how the ripple works: 5.3.c Packet Pg. 231 Attachment: Communication Handout 2018_0130 (Study of Economic Impacts of Arts and Culture) What makes up Edmonds’ arts and culture sector? ECA and major festivals are anchor attractions, and people come to Edmonds for a variety of arts and cultural attractions provided by at least 100 arts and culture organizations, programs, and businesses. It is this diverse constellation of services and attractions that gives Edmonds’ arts and culture scene its strength. Public Sector2 Entities 57 Businesses 44 Not-for-profits What do arts participants do in Edmonds? Residents and visitors enjoy an array of arts disciplines, and have an especially strong interest in music. Most arts participants also dine or shop while in Edmonds, adding to their impact on the local economy. Visit theWaterfrontor a Park 16% BuySomething 20% Buy a Meal,Drink, orSnack 64% Who partakes in Edmonds’ arts and culture offerings? Edmonds residents take advantage of the proximity of arts and culture offerings, as do visitors who live within a 30-minute drive. Visitors from farther away remain an under-tapped market to augment Edmonds’ strong regional draw. FACTS & FIGURES 30-Minute Drivetime Respondents More Responses Fewer Responses 5.3.c Packet Pg. 232 Attachment: Communication Handout 2018_0130 (Study of Economic Impacts of Arts and Culture) RECOMMENDATIONS CITY OF EDMONDS ARTS & CULTURE The City of Edmonds Arts and Culture 2017 Economic Impact Study demonstrates that the arts and culture sector has a significant positive impact on the Edmonds economy and contributes to quality of life and community image and identity. The Edmonds community has worked hard to enhance the arts and culture sector since the latest update of the Community Cultural Plan in 2014, and the City and community partners have made efforts to integrate the arts into the city’s physical infrastructure, planning, image, and brand identity. Recommendations for how Edmonds can build on its arts and culture strengths and further enhance the economy and community overall are listed below. 1 Strengthen the arts and culture sector citywide in economic development efforts. »Embrace arts and culture as a core part of the Edmonds community identity citywide. Consider the entire city in implementing arts and culture strategies, especially along Highway 99 where there is greater racial and ethnic diversity, and increase the arts and culture network to include new, informal, and non-traditional entities. 2 Integrate arts and culture’s contributions to the economy in new and existing community economic development efforts. »Seek Creative District designation through the Washington State Arts Commission. A “creative district” is a hub for social and business activity that includes cultural facilities, creative industries, and arts-related businesses. Designation enhances Edmonds’ ability to pursue creative industry-related grants, better promote the community’s arts and culture-focused identity, recruit creative entrepreneurs, and increase tourism. »Identify arts and culture businesses and stakeholders as a targeted economic cluster along with others identified in the City’s Economic Development Element. Explore connections to technology firms and other organizations in creative industries. »Advocate for city infrastructure decisions that support arts and culture growth. Bring artists, business leaders, and entrepreneurs into current discussions to improve infrastructure that allows more options to experience Edmond’s arts and culture attractions. For example, efforts include the 4th Avenue Arts Corridor to build a better walking connection between the ECA, Civic Field, and Main Street. »Cultivate a robust arts and culture sector with a healthy array of large and small entities and a diverse constellation of attractions. 2017 ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY Visit www.edmondswa.gov for the full report or more information.January 30, 2018 5.3.d Packet Pg. 233 Attachment: Recommendations Insert 2018_0130 (Study of Economic Impacts of Arts and Culture) –Identify a limited number of cornerstone arts events or disciplines that can grow to become key anchors of arts and culture in Edmonds. The importance of Edmonds Center for the Arts in the Edmonds cultural ecosystem as demonstrated by this report may help to set such a direction. –Explore ways to support small organizations and businesses, as many of Edmonds arts and culture organizations employ less than five people, such as economic gardening and business mentoring. The stronger the constellation of arts and culture organizations, big and small, the stronger the entire network. –Foster diverse offerings across artistic disciplines, through a variety of settings from formal to informal. It is the diversity of arts offerings that create a positive arts and culture identity in Edmonds, draws participation, and is valued by residents and visitors alike.3 Collaborate to attract target audiences. To maintain a pipeline of arts and culture supporters, it will be important to actively address the arts and culture interests of individuals under 40 and to reflect the region’s evolving demographics regarding race and ethnicity. »Coordinate efforts, including programming and promotions, to create a critical mass of offerings for target audiences, bridging across multiple venues. »Expand arts programming targeted to those under 40. Consider ways to link social and entertainment components, especially around food and drink, as well as family-friendly opportunities. »Design advisory functions for civic, not-for-profit, and public entities that bring representatives of those under 40 and underrepresented populations into planning and decision-making. This is likely to look different than traditional board roles, and should accommodate the limited time availability of those under 40.4 Work across the community to develop positive visitor experiences. The economic value of arts and culture visitors is enhanced when they eat, drink, and shop locally, or when they stay overnight. These extended experiences work best when place-based features are coordinated with arts and culture “products.” »Bundle dining/drinking, recreation, and lodging opportunities with arts and cultural experiences. Some of these packages can be tailored at specific target audiences (see item above). »Make sure the logistics of visitor experiences are easy, with convenient parking, clear wayfinding, etc. Understand and address existing barriers and points of friction. »Promote Edmonds’ parks and waterfront activities at arts and culture venues, activities, and events.5 Market Edmonds regionally and tier marketing investments and strategies. This study shows that residents and “day trippers” are the primary sources of economic impact related to arts and culture in Edmonds today. There remains potential to reach and effectively serve visitors beyond a 30-minute drive time, and to intentionally build tourism linked to arts and culture, but more research is needed. »Prioritize marketing and promotion in the areas of North Seattle, Kingston, and Snohomish County, defined roughly by a 30-minute drive. Assess competition within that drive time area, and identify program niches likely to draw from those communities. Consider opportunities to serve as a satellite for Seattle arts and culture organizations, thereby minimizing the need to drive into downtown Seattle. »Explore additional opportunities to attract out-of-area tourists. While this study indicates that Edmonds is not currently an overnight destination but a regional attraction, the value of overnight visitors may make investment in the tourist market worthwhile. Explore opportunities, including ways to better connect Edmonds arts and culture with the cruise industry. »Continue work with Snohomish County and Washington State arts, recreation, and tourism entities to strengthen and promote Edmonds’s offerings. 5.3.d Packet Pg. 234 Attachment: Recommendations Insert 2018_0130 (Study of Economic Impacts of Arts and Culture) City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 02/6/2018 Presentation of EDC Memo on BD1 Zone Ground-Floor Height Staff Lead: Patrick Doherty Department: Economic Development Preparer: Patrick Doherty Background/History During 2017 the Development Feasibility Subgroup (consisting of three members) of the Economic Development Commission (EDC) discussed various issues related to potential barriers to development, redevelopment and economic vitality in Edmonds. One issue identified that appears to be holding back redevelopment in the BD1 zone of the City Center is the required 15-foot ground-floor height for new buildings. Within the 30-foot height limit, this restricts new buildings to two floors, while in other Downtown (BD) zones, 3 floors are possible. The Subgroup presented this issue, its analysis, and its recommendations to the full EDC in December and January, who approved the attached memo, outlining its recommendations. Staff Recommendation Presentation only at 2/6/18 meeting. Direction from City Council is requested regarding date and venue for discussion whether to send this issue to Planning Division for development and eventual presentation to Planning Board and City Council with recommendations. Narrative With the realization that only two floors are possible within the 30-foot height limit in the BD1 zone, the EDC unanimously recommended that alternatives be considered that could allow new buildings to include three floors within the height limit. The EDC believed that new in-fill development in the BD1 zone would provide the following benefits: · New cultural, shopping, and recreation opportunities within the community; as more space becomes available, new businesses will be able to find locations in Downtown Edmonds and existing businesses will have the opportunity to expand. · New infusion of revenue into the city or county budget as a result of redevelopment activities (sales tax, hotel tax, and utility tax revenues) in order to provide greater public safety, parks and transportation services. · More job opportunities (retail, service, office, and/or manufacturing jobs); more businesses result in job creation. · More housing opportunities in a walkable environment. Three floors allows for upper-level residential in the Downtown core. More downtown residents will contribute to a more vital and vibrant core, increase retail activity and the overall desirability of locating a business or office in Downtown Edmonds. 5.4 Packet Pg. 235 · Additions of one or two additional stories atop existing buildings (up to the 30-foot limit) could leverage needed restoration of existing buildings and/or building façades, improving the look and feel of Downtown. Existing building standards and design guidelines would remain in place, helping to maintain the character of our community. · Construction jobs will be created by the development of new buildings and new infrastructure and the remodeling of existing buildings. For these reasons, together with other information provided in detail in the attached memo, the EDC recommends its Preferred Alternative for consideration by City Council, as follows: Reduce the ground-floor height requirement in BD1 to 12 feet, as found in all other BD zones, while maintaining a 30 foot building height limit. Allowing a 12-foot ground-floor height makes developing three levels within the 30 foot height restriction possible. Attachments: Final EDC Memo ground floor height 5.4 Packet Pg. 236 M E M O R A N D U M TO: MAYOR EARLING AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: JAMIE REECE, CHAIR, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION SUBJECT: RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING 15-FOOT MINIMUM GROUND-FLOOR HEIGHT IN EDMONDS BD1 ZONE DATE: January 17, 2018 _____________________________________________________________________________________ OBJECTIVE: Increase City revenues, jobs, housing options and new cultural, shopping and recreation opportunities in Edmonds APPROACH: Stimulate economic growth in the downtown core by revising zoning standards in BD1 to encourage new construction and redevelopment of vacant sites and/or deteriorating structures. BACKGROUND: In January 2007, the Edmonds City Council passed Ordinance No. 3624, enacting a new chapter 16.43 relating to downtown business zoning. The Downtown Business zone (BD) was subdivided into 5 subdistricts, each with its own unique mix of permitted uses and zoning regulations. The intent was to promote Edmonds as a setting for retail, office, entertainment and associated businesses, define strong pedestrian links, and create a strong retail core at the downtown’s focal center. The code allows building heights of 30 feet in all BD zones except zone BD5, where it is 25 feet. Site development standards also call for a minimum ground-floor height of 12 feet in all BD zones, except BD1 where the minimum ground-floor height requirement is 15 feet. BD1 was singled out for the 15-foot height requirement because, at the time, it was thought a higher ground floor height (15 feet) would encourage a broader range of retail development, resulting in attractive development/redevelopment and a strong retail core. (add foot note: “Minimum height of ground floor within the designated street-front” means the vertical distance from top to top of the successive finished floor surfaces for that portion of the ground floor 5.4.a Packet Pg. 237 Attachment: Final EDC Memo ground floor height (Presentation of EDC Memo on BD1 Zone Ground-Floor Height) located within the designated street front (see ECDC 16.43.030(B)); and, if the ground floor is the only floor above street grade, from the top of the floor finish to the top of the ceiling joists or, where there is not a ceiling, to the top of the roof rafters.). DISCUSSION: The current zoning standards in zones BD1 through BD4 allow for structures 30 feet in height. In all BD zones except BD1, the minimum ground-floor height requirement is 12 feet. With a maximum building height of 30 feet, three levels of usable space may be achieved. However, in BD1, with the ground-floor minimum height requirement of 15 feet, only two floors of usable space may be achieved within the 30- foot height limit. In today’s market, most financially viable redevelopment requires a minimum of three levels of rentable space to “pencil out.” In BD1, with the ground floor height requirement of 15 feet, development/redevelopment has been stagnating, as contrasted with some new development/ redevelopment in other BD zones. As a result, there is a missed opportunity for commercial growth and increased housing. There is a demand and need for additional commercial space in the Downton Core. The City receives numerous inquiries from prospective retailers, gallery operators, lodging establishments, restaurateurs, and office-based employers, seeking Downtown tenant space. There is very little available as most existing buildings are small and mostly fully occupied. Discussions with property owners and potential developers indicate the few vacant or substantially under-developed sites in the BD1 are stymied from being (re)developed by the de facto two-story limit. While higher ground-level heights may be desirable for some uses, they are no longer considered necessary. Building owners and tenants are anxious for rentable, quality space in the Edmonds retail core. Edmonds has the opportunity to facilitate creating such space by reducing the minimum ground- floor height requirement in BD1 to 12 feet as found in other BD zones. Staff reviewed ground-floor height requirements for our competitive cities. For most, there is no minimum height other than that required by the International Building Code, (a 7 foot 6 inch minimum). Kirkland requires a 13 to 15-foot first floor, depending on the overall height of the building, which in commercial zones ranges from 30 feet to 55 feet. Shoreline and Downtown Tacoma require a 12-foot first floor. Seattle specifies 13 feet in the Neighborhood Commercial zones and 15 feet downtown, where buildings are significantly higher then 30 feet. The EDC considered several different approaches to address the issue of creating an environment to attract development and redevelopment; i.e. allowing for three-story structures in BD1. Three Alternatives were discussed: Alternative 1: Preferred Alternative. Reduce the ground-floor height requirement in BD1 to 12 feet, as found in all other BD zones, while maintaining a 30 foot building height limit. Allowing a 12-foot ground-floor height makes developing three levels within the 30 foot height restriction possible. Alternative 2: Maintain the 15 first floor requirement and allow building heights in BD1 in excess of 30 feet, possibly up to 35 feet. This option includes a potential stipulation that a view study 5.4.a Packet Pg. 238 Attachment: Final EDC Memo ground floor height (Presentation of EDC Memo on BD1 Zone Ground-Floor Height) be conducted to ensure any such additional height above 30 feet would not significantly impact views. This was viewed as a good compromise, but adding additional height was not considered a first choice by the Committee. Alternative 3: Combine Options 1 and 2; decrease the first-floor height requirement but allow overall building height, for three story structures, to increase. A 13-foot first floor requirement for example, could result in a 31-foot building, for example. RECOMMENDATION: The EDC recommends Alternative 1 to City Council for consideration: reduce the ground-floor height minimum in BD1 to 12 feet as required in other BD zones. The reduction in the ground-floor height requirement may improve the economic vitality of the City of Edmonds Downtown core by encouraging (re(development of downtown vacant sites and deteriorating or substantially under-developed structures and attracting new uses the core. There are many positive outcomes that may result from this proposed adjustment: • New cultural, shopping, and recreation opportunities within the community; as more space becomes available, new businesses will be able to find locations in Downtown Edmonds and existing businesses will have the opportunity to expand. • New infusion of revenue into the city or county budget as a result of redevelopment activities (sales tax, hotel tax, and utility tax revenues) in order to provide greater public safety, parks and transportation services. • More job opportunities (retail, service, office, and/or manufacturing jobs); more businesses result in job creation. • More housing opportunities in a walkable environment. Three floors allows for upper-level residential in the Downtown core. More downtown residents will contribute to a more vital and vibrant core, increase retail activity and the overall desirability of locating a business or office in Downtown Edmonds. • Additions of one or two additional stories atop existing buildings (up to the 30-foot limit) could leverage needed restoration of existing buildings and/or building façades, improving the look and feel of Downtown. Existing building standards and design guidelines would remain in place, helping to maintain the character of our community. • Construction jobs will be created by the development of new buildings and new infrastructure and the remodeling of existing buildings. The EDC discussed potential negative impacts of the proposed change and concluded they would be minimal. • Views would not be impacted as building heights will not be altered. • Increased density in terms of visitors to downtown and new residents would add vitality, but could also impact parking availability. 5.4.a Packet Pg. 239 Attachment: Final EDC Memo ground floor height (Presentation of EDC Memo on BD1 Zone Ground-Floor Height) • Changes in the character of the streetscape may be considered both a positive and a negative. Deteriorating buildings are an eyesore and can be dangerous. New construction will not necessarily be as quaint, but will keep the overall character of the Downtown. Current design standards, first adopted in 2008, ensure the desired “look and feel” of the Downtown Core will be maintained. Overall, in the opinion of the EDC, the positives outweigh the potential negatives. We encourage Council to amend the code in BD1 to reduce the minimum required ground-floor height to 12 feet. 5.4.a Packet Pg. 240 Attachment: Final EDC Memo ground floor height (Presentation of EDC Memo on BD1 Zone Ground-Floor Height) City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 02/6/2018 Authorization of Professional Services Agreement for Edmonds Marsh Study Staff Lead: City Council Department: Development Services Preparer: Diane Cunningham Background/History The City Council has been planning for a Marsh Study to be conducted that will provide scientific information on the Edmonds Marsh. A three-member Council task force has provided guidance and recommendations on the project. In 2017, a Request for Proposals (RFP) was issued and, after an extensive review process, a consultant (Windward) was selected and negotiation began on a professional services agreement for the project. The City Council considered the draft scope and schedule at two prior public meetings. Staff Recommendation Authorize the Mayor to sign the Marsh Study professional services agreement. Narrative Based on Windward's original project proposal, plus follow-up draft revisions and recent input from the City Council, a professional services agreement was developed. (Attachment 1). It has been reviewed by the City Attorney's Office. Per City Council direction, the estimated timelines have been extended two months, with a clause in the scope adding an extra two months beyond that if necessary. The total amount of the project is $119,419. Attachments: Ex. 1: Windward Edmonds Marsh Proposal_Final Ex. 2: Windward Exhibit A Ex. 3: Windward Exhibit B - Fee Schedule 7.1 Packet Pg. 241 CITY OF EDMONDS 121 5th Avenue North, Edmonds WA 98020 Phone: 425.771.0220 • Fax: 425.771.0221 • Web: www.edmondswa.gov DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT • PLANNING DIVISION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) is made and entered into between the City of Edmonds, hereinafter referred to as the “City”, and Windward Environmental, LLC, hereinafter referred to as the “Consultant”. WHEREAS, the City desires to engage the professional services and assistance of the Consultant for services related to performing a Site-specific, Planning-Level Scientific Study of the Edmonds Marsh; and WHEREAS, Windward Environmental, LLC, is qualified and available to provide those services under this Agreement; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of mutual benefits accruing, it is agreed by and between the parties hereto as follows: 1. Scope of work. The Scope of Work shall include all services and material necessary to accomplish the above-mentioned objectives in accordance with the Scope of Services that is marked as Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. 2. Payments. The Consultant shall be paid by the City for completed work for services rendered under this Agreement as provided hereinafter. Such payment shall be full compensation for work performed or services rendered and for all labor, materials, supplies, equipment and incidentals necessary to complete the work. A. Payment for work accomplished under the terms of this Agreement shall be based on a time and expense basis as set forth on the fee schedule found in Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated by this reference; provided in no event shall the payment for work performed pursuant to this Agreement exceed the sum of $119,419. B. All vouchers shall be submitted by the Consultant to the City for payment pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. The City shall pay the appropriate amount for each voucher to the Consultant. The Consultant may submit vouchers to the City monthly for services performed and accepted by the City. Billing shall be reviewed in conjunction with the City’s warrant process. No billing shall be considered for payment that has not been submitted to the City three days prior to the scheduled cut-off date. Such late vouchers will be checked by the City and payment will be made in the next regular payment cycle. 7.1.a Packet Pg. 242 Attachment: Ex. 1: Windward Edmonds Marsh Proposal_Final [Revision 4] (Edmonds Marsh Study Professional Services Agreement) C. The costs, records and accounts pertaining to this Agreement are to be kept available for inspection by representatives of the City for a period of three (3) years after final payment. Copies shall be made available upon request. 3. Ownership and use of documents. All research, tests, surveys, preliminary data and any and all other work product prepared or gathered by the Consultant in preparation for the services rendered by the Consultant under this Agreement shall be and are the property of Consultant, provided that: A. All fi nal reports, presentations and testimony prepared by the Consultant shall become the property of the City upon their presentation to and acceptance by the City and shall at that date become the property of the City. B. The City shall have the right, upon reasonable request, to inspect, review and subject to the approval of the Consultant, copy any work product. C. In the event that the Consultant shall default on this Agreement, or in the event that this Agreement shall be terminated prior to its completion as herein provided, the work product of the Consultant, along with a summary of work done to date of default or termination, shall become the property of the City and tender of the work product and summary shall be a prerequisite to final payment under this Agreement. The summary of work done shall be prepared at no additional cost. 4. Time of performance. The Consultant shall perform the work authorized by this Agreement promptly in accordance with the receipt of the required government approvals. 5. Hold Harmless agreement. The Consultant shall indemnify and hold the City and its officers and employees harmless from and shall process and defend at its own expense all claims, demands, or suits at law or equity arising in whole or in part from the Consultant’s negligence or breach of any of its obligations under this Agreement; provided that nothing herein shall require a Consultant to indemnify the City against and hold harmless the City from claims, demands or suits based solely upon the conduct of the City, its agents, officers and employees; and provided further that if the claims or suits are caused by or result from the concurrent negligence of (a) the Consultant’s agents or employees, and (b) the City, its agents, officers and employees, this indemnity provision with respect to (1) claims or suits based upon such negligence (2) the costs to the City of defending such claims and suits shall be valid and enforceable only to the extent of the Consultant’s negligence or the negligence of the Consultant’s agents or employees. 6. General and professional liability insurance. The Consultant shall obtain and keep in force during the terms of the Agreement, or as otherwise required, the following insurance with companies or through sources approved by the State Insurance Commissioner pursuant to Title 48 RCW. Insurance Coverage A. Worker’s compensation and employer’s liability insurance as required by the State. 7.1.a Packet Pg. 243 Attachment: Ex. 1: Windward Edmonds Marsh Proposal_Final [Revision 4] (Edmonds Marsh Study Professional Services Agreement) B. Commercial general liability and property damage insurance in an aggregate amount not less than two million dollars ($2,000,000) for bodily injury, including death and property damage. The per occurrence amount shall be written with limits no less than one million dollars ($1,000,000). C. Vehicle liability insurance for any automobile used in an amount not less than a one million dollar ($1,000,000) combined single limit. D. Professional liability insurance in the amount of one million dollars ($1,000,000). Excepting the Worker’s Compensation Insurance and Professional Liability Insurance secured by the Consultant, the City will be named on all policies as an additional insured. The Consultant shall furnish the City with verification of insurance and endorsements required by the Agreement. The City reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies at any time. All insurance shall be obtained from an insurance company authorized to do business in the State of Washington. The Consultant shall submit a verification of insurance as outlined above within fourteen days of the execution of this Agreement to the City. No cancellation of the foregoing policies shall be effective without thirty days prior notice to the City. The Consultant’s professional liability to the City shall be limited to the amount payable under this Agreement or one million dollars ($1,000,000), whichever is the greater, unless modified elsewhere in this Agreement. In no case shall the Consultant’s professional liability to third parties be limited in any way. 7. Discrimination prohibited. Consultant shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, national origin, age, sex, sexual orientation, marital status, veteran status, liability for service in the armed forces of the United States, disability, or the presence of any sensory, mental or physical handicap, or any other protected class status, unless based upon a bona fide occupational qualification. 8. Consultant is an independent contractor. The parties intend that an independent contractor relationship will be created by this Agreement. No agent, employee or representative of the Consultant shall be deemed to be an agent, employee or representative of the City for any purpose. Consultant shall be solely responsible for all acts of its agents, employees, representatives and subcontractors during the performance of this Agreement. 9. City approval of work. Notwithstanding the Consultant’s status as an independent contractor, results of the work performed pursuant to this Agreement must meet the approval of the City. 10. Termination. This Agreement may be terminated without cause by the City at any time during the term of the Agreement by ten (10) day written notice from the City to the Consultant. If City so terminates this Agreement, Consultant shall immediately stop all work herein and shall immediately cause its suppliers or 7.1.a Packet Pg. 244 Attachment: Ex. 1: Windward Edmonds Marsh Proposal_Final [Revision 4] (Edmonds Marsh Study Professional Services Agreement) subcontractors to cease work. Unless the termination is for cause, the City shall determine and pay to Consultant the percentage of the Agreement price equal to the percentage of conforming services performed and goods delivered or partially manufactured prior to the delivery of City’s termination notice, plus reasonable actual direct out-of-pocket expenses incurred by Consultant as a result of the termination (excluding any lost profits). 11. Integration. The Agreement between the parties shall consist of this document, the Consultant’s proposal attached hereto as Exhibit A, and Consultant’s fee schedule attached hereto as Exhibit B. These writings constitute the entire Agreement of the parties and shall not be amended except by a writing executed by both parties. In the event of any conflict between this written Agreement and provision of Exhibits A or B, this Agreement shall control. 12. Changes/Additional work. The City may engage Consultant to perform services in addition to those listed in this Agreement, and Consultant will be entitled to additional compensation for authorized additional services or materials. The City shall not be liable for additional compensation until and unless any and all additional work and compensation is approved in advance in writing and signed by both parties to this Agreement. If conditions are encountered which are not anticipated in the Scope of Work, the City understands that a revision to the Scope of Work and fees may be required. Provided, however, that nothing in this paragraph shall be interpreted to obligate the Consultant to render services, or the City to pay for services rendered, in excess of the Scope of Work in Exhibit A, unless or until an amendment to this Agreement is approved in writing by both parties. 13. Standard of care. Consultant represents that Consultant has the necessary knowledge, skill and experience to perform services required by this Agreement. Consultant and any persons employed by Consultant shall use their best efforts to perform the work in a professional manner consistent with sound practices, in accordance with the usual and customary professional care required for services of the type described in the Scope of Work. 14. Non-waiver. Waiver by the City of any provision of this Agreement or any time limitation provided for in this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other provision. 15. Non-assignable. The services to be provided by the Consultant shall not be assigned or subcontracted without the express written consent of the City. 16. Covenant against contingent fees. The Consultant warrants that it has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for the Consultant, to solicit or secure this contract, and that it has not paid or agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for the Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gifts or any other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award of making this Agreement. For breach or violation of this warranty, the City shall have the right to annul this Agreement without liability or, in its discretion to deduct from the contract price or consideration, or otherwise recover, the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift, or contingent fee. 7.1.a Packet Pg. 245 Attachment: Ex. 1: Windward Edmonds Marsh Proposal_Final [Revision 4] (Edmonds Marsh Study Professional Services Agreement) 17. Compliance with laws. The Consultant in the performance of this Agreement shall comply with all applicable Federal, State or local laws and ordinances, including regulations for licensing, certification and operation of facilities, programs and accreditation, and licensing of individuals, and any other standards or criteria as described in the Agreement to assure quality of services. 18. Notices. Notices shall be sent to the following address, with receipt of any notice being deemed effective three days after deposit of written notice. City of Edmonds Consultant City of Edmonds Windward Environmental, LLC 121 Fifth Avenue North 200 West Mercer St., Suite 401 Edmonds, WA 98020 Seattle, WA 98119 425-771-0220 206-378-1364 DATED THIS DAY OF , 2018. CITY OF EDMONDS WINDWARD ENVIRONMENTAL LLC David O. Earling, Mayor By: ________________________ Its: __________________________ ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: Scott Passey, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Office of the City Attorney 7.1.a Packet Pg. 246 Attachment: Ex. 1: Windward Edmonds Marsh Proposal_Final [Revision 4] (Edmonds Marsh Study Professional Services Agreement) STATE OF WASHINGTON ) )ss COUNTY OF ) On this day of , 2018, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared , to me known to be the _____ of the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he/she was authorized to execute said instrument and that the seal affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year first above written. NOTARY PUBLIC My commission expires: 7.1.a Packet Pg. 247 Attachment: Ex. 1: Windward Edmonds Marsh Proposal_Final [Revision 4] (Edmonds Marsh Study Professional Services Agreement) EXHIBIT A 200 West Mercer St.  Suite 401  Seattle, WA 98119 Phone: 206.378.1364  Fax: 206.973.3048  www.windwardenv.com SCOPE OF WORK The following subsections describe the approach to the scope of work for the Edmonds Marsh Study. The approaches for Components 1 through 4 (the required components from the Marsh Study RFP) are described in the correspondingly numbered task sections. Methods for the accomplishment of Components 5 and 9 are also included, described under Tasks 5 and 6, respectively. In general, Windward will implement these tasks in the order in which they are listed; however, certain steps may be done in a different order. For example, it may be determined that implementing Task 2 (Evaluation of Site-Specific Buffers for Ecological Functions) prior to Task 1 (Baseline Analysis), will be valuable in helping to inform the study design for Task 1. Task 1: Baseline Analysis The broad ecological functions currently being performed by the Edmonds Marsh and Shellabarger/Stella’s Marsh will be evaluated by implementing a baseline wetland monitoring study. Water level and quality, vegetation, and invertebrate1 data will be collected, and bird2 and other wildlife surveys3 will be performed as part of the study. In addition, conventional sediment chemistry data (e.g., total organic carbon [TOC], grain size, etc.) will be collected, and sediment redox profiles will be determined. Photos will also be taken at establish photo stations during each monitoring event. The first step in completing this task will be to develop a baseline wetland monitoring plan that will include detailed methods about how and when data will be collected. The monitoring plan will be developed in coordination with City staff and other stakeholders to ensure that it meets the requested goals and objectives of the baseline study. It is anticipated that the baseline study will be conducted over the course of one year, in order to gather data about conditions within the Marsh during all four seasons. The monitoring plan will further detail which monitoring parameters will be collected when, and how frequently they will be collected throughout the year. It will also identify specific monitoring locations for each of the metrics described herein, and will 1 Collected invertebrates will be identified by the field crew to the lowest taxonomic level possible (e.g., Order). 2 Bird surveys (e.g., point count surveys) will be conducted by Windward and by qualified volunteers/citizen scientists. Windward will oversee and coordinate these surveys. 3 Wildlife observations made at any time during monitoring events will be recorded in the field notebook and summarized in the monitoring reports. Wildlife cameras will also be used to assist with observations of animals using the marsh and its buffer areas. 7.1.b Packet Pg. 248 Attachment: Ex. 2: Windward Exhibit A [Revision 3] (Edmonds Marsh Study Professional Services Agreement) Exhibit A: Edmonds Marsh Study SOW, Deliverables, and Schedule January 12, 2018 Page 2 expand on the monitoring methods to be followed. A major goal for the monitoring plan will be to select and describe monitoring methods that are easy to implement and that can be repeated easily so that comparative data can be collected in the future. Throughout the baseline monitoring year, the project manager and senior advisor will attend quarterly council meetings as well as two or three public meetings in order to provide project updates. Task 2: Evaluation of Site-specific Buffers for Ecological Functions This task will consist of two steps: 1) the preparation of a white paper summarizing the available scientific literature on wetland buffer functions and recommended buffer widths, and 2) a site-specific evaluation of the Marsh, its surrounding land uses and land ownership, and opportunities for buffer restoration or enhancement. Windward anticipates that while these steps will result in two separate deliverables, the site- specific evaluation will rely heavily on the literature summarized in the white paper when making recommendations about Marsh buffer widths and buffer restoration opportunities. The White Paper The white paper will synthesize and summarize information about the functions and recommended widths of wetland buffers; this information will be gathered from a thorough review of scientific literature and guidance documents dealing with the topic. Documents specific to the Pacific Northwest and western United States will be prioritized. As much as possible, the white paper will include information about the range of buffer widths necessary to support the following ecological functions: 1. Improving water quality (removing sediment, nutrients, and toxics) 2. Maintaining an appropriate microclimate 3. Providing a screen sufficient to prevent the disturbance of wildlife that use the Marsh 4. Maintaining habitat connectivity and critical habitat for species that use the Marsh as forage habitat, breeding habitat, and refuge/shelter The white paper will also summarize the available information pertaining to buffer widths that have been found to be insufficient to provide the four ecological functions listed herein. Ideally, buffer width information will be summarized in a table that will rate the quality of specific buffer width ranges as “high,” “medium,” or “low” for each of the four ecological functions. Site-specific Evaluation The site-specific evaluation of the Marsh will evaluate the extent of the current Marsh buffers, as well as land uses and ownership immediately adjacent to the Marsh, extending at least 125 ft from the Marsh perimeter in all directions (125 ft is the combined distance of the 110-ft buffer and 15-ft setback proposed by the City for the 7.1.b Packet Pg. 249 Attachment: Ex. 2: Windward Exhibit A [Revision 3] (Edmonds Marsh Study Professional Services Agreement) Exhibit A: Edmonds Marsh Study SOW, Deliverables, and Schedule January 12, 2018 Page 3 Marsh). A map will be developed to clearly outline existing Marsh buffers and illustrate adjacent land uses and ownership; this map will be based on the map attached to this RFP. Any stormwater outfalls or areas where stormwater is known to flow overland into the Marsh will also be mapped. The ability of existing Marsh buffers to provide the four ecological functions listed will be evaluated by combining findings from the white paper with information about existing buffer widths and conditions. The site-specific evaluation will identify opportunities for buffer extension and restoration, and will make specific recommendations for such activities. The evaluation will also consider what impacts the Marsh could experience if existing buffers were to be affected by new development or other land use changes, or if proposed mitigation for a development project were to include relatively narrow buffers.4 Task 3: 2019 SMP Update Information The information gathered during Tasks 1 and 2—such as the current conditions of the Marsh and its existing buffers, as well as recommendations for restoration opportunities within buffer areas—will be available to help inform the 2019 Shoreline Master Program (SMP) update. Therefore, Task 3 will require a relatively low level of effort, which will include summarizing pertinent information from Tasks 1 and 2 in a format that will be easily incorporated into the 2019 SMP update. Windward will work with City staff to ensure that the information summarized as part of this task is appropriate for incorporation into the 2019 SMP update. Task 4: Willow Creek Daylighting Impacts The Willow Creek daylighting project is expected to increase the Marsh’s inundation area by approximately 2.5 ac, shift habitat areas that are currently freshwater and dominated by cattail to salt marsh habitat, and improve fish access to both the creek and the Marsh. The new daylighted channel (based on the preferred alignment alternative Option C described in the FS [Shannon & Wilson 2015]) will run midway through Marina Beach Park and discharge into Puget Sound to the south of the Edmonds Marina. Windward’s analysis will include recommendations for monitoring that could be conducted after the daylighting project is complete, as well as recommendations for native buffer plantings that could be installed along the daylighted creek banks. Windward will analyze how the Willow Creek daylighting project will likely affect ecological functions and conditions within the Marsh. We envision employing modeling tools such as Resource Equivalency Analysis (REA) or Habitat Equivalency Analysis (HEA), coupled with GIS, to quantitatively estimate the ecosystem service units that will be gained. REA typically uses a resource metric that has had a population or quantity change (e.g., number of juvenile coho salmon, biomass of benthic 4 For the purposes of this approach, “relatively narrow buffers” are considered to be those less than 110 ft with a 15-ft setback, as outlined in Option M of the FS (Shannon & Wilson 2015). 7.1.b Packet Pg. 250 Attachment: Ex. 2: Windward Exhibit A [Revision 3] (Edmonds Marsh Study Professional Services Agreement) Exhibit A: Edmonds Marsh Study SOW, Deliverables, and Schedule January 12, 2018 Page 4 organisms). The models are used to examine the compare the quantity of habitat services under current conditions to those expected to result from a future restored condition (in this case, the Willow Creek daylighting project). HEA is a version of REA that uses a habitat metric, such as acres of land, and analyzes a change in services provided by that habitat. Information gathered during Tasks 1 and 2 will be used to construct a GIS-based REA/HEA model and reflect baseline Marsh services, including support of plant or animal populations. Using the ecosystem changes that are anticipated to occur in the Marsh in response to the daylighting of Willow Creek, the model will be used to reflect the increased value of various metrics (i.e., productivity, biomass, etc.). The model will also allow ecosystem service credits to be calculated once the City implements the Willow Creek daylighting project. The quantity of ecosystem services generated by the project will be derived by comparing the resource functions of the baseline Marsh condition with the estimated future functions of the Marsh based on the literature and best professional judgement. Task 5: Vegetation Enhancement Project Impacts (Optional Component 5) Using information gathered during Task 2, Windward will work to identify specific areas around the Marsh where denser, more diverse, or otherwise better-quality buffers—which can be installed through volunteer vegetation enhancement projects— can serve to improve ecological functions within the marsh, or possibly reduce or otherwise alter the buffer widths necessary to protect and maintain those functions. The scope for this task will be developed further in the future in coordination with the City, after Tasks 1-4 are underway. Task 6: Preparation for a Long-term Watershed Management Study (Optional Component 9) In order to help determine an initial scope and process for developing a long-term watershed management study and strategy, Windward will work closely with City staff to ensure that we understand the broad range of issues related to the Marsh and its watershed, and to identify the best options for engaging the public in a management planning process. Information regarding the Marsh, Willow Creek, and Shellabarger Creek provided in the City’s Shoreline Master Program Restoration Plan (City of Edmonds 2015), Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan (City of Edmonds 2016a), City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan (City of Edmonds 2016b), and Storm and Surface Water Comprehensive Management Plan (Herrera and City of Edmonds 2010) will also be reviewed to help establish the steps and scope of the study plan, and to further develop a list of stakeholders. The scope for this task will be developed further in the future in coordination with the City, after Tasks 1-4 are underway. 7.1.b Packet Pg. 251 Attachment: Ex. 2: Windward Exhibit A [Revision 3] (Edmonds Marsh Study Professional Services Agreement) Exhibit A: Edmonds Marsh Study SOW, Deliverables, and Schedule January 12, 2018 Page 5 DELIVERABLES The deliverables for each task are described below. Task 1 A baseline wetland monitoring plan will be developed to guide field data collection efforts. The results of the baseline wetland monitoring study will be presented in a data report. The report will include a qualitative evaluation of the ecological functions being provided by the Marsh in its baseline condition, based on the data collected. For example, for each metric monitored, the ecological functions of the Marsh can be rated as “high,” “medium,” or “low” by comparing the baseline data for the Marsh to data from one or more reference marshes or data in the scientific literature. Task 2 The deliverables for this task will include the white paper summarizing available scientific information about wetland buffer functions, and a technical report with detailed maps presenting the results of the site-specific evaluation. Task 3 The deliverables for this task will be text sections that can be directly incorporated into the 2019 SMP update, as well as an updated GIS map of the Marsh and its surroundings (if the City desires such a map to be included in the update). Task 4 A technical memorandum will be prepared to describe the process used to develop the REA/HEA model and the results of the modeling effort. Task 5 The deliverable for this task will likely be a short report or technical memorandum summarizing recommendations for vegetation enhancement projects around the Marsh and the anticipated impacts of those projects. The appropriate deliverable will be determined in consultation with the City as the scope for this task is further developed. Task 6 The deliverable for this task will likely be a memorandum summarizing the goals and plans for the Marsh, Willow Creek, and Shellabarger Creek specified in existing City documents; an overview of stakeholders involved to-date in plans for the Marsh and its tributaries; ideas for public outreach activities (e.g., online surveys, community meetings) that could help further develop a strategy for the Marsh and its watershed; and an outline of the scope and process that could be used to develop a long-term watershed management study. The appropriate deliverable will be determined in consultation with the City as the scope for this task is further developed. 7.1.b Packet Pg. 252 Attachment: Ex. 2: Windward Exhibit A [Revision 3] (Edmonds Marsh Study Professional Services Agreement) Exhibit A: Edmonds Marsh Study SOW, Deliverables, and Schedule January 12, 2018 Page 6 SCHEDULE All tasks associated with this project will be substantially completed by the end of July 2019, as outlined in the project schedule table below, provided that any specific tasks may be extended an additional two months as necessary to effectively address the relevant issues 7.1.b Packet Pg. 253 Attachment: Ex. 2: Windward Exhibit A [Revision 3] (Edmonds Marsh Study Professional Services Agreement) EXHIBIT A 200 West Mercer St.  Suite 401  Seattle, WA 98119 Phone: 206.378.1364  Fax: 206.973.3048  www.windwardenv.com Table 2. Project schedule Project Task/Milestone Estimated Initiation Date Estimated Completion Date Kick-off Meeting with City January 1, 2018 February 27, 2018 Contract Approval by City by February 7, 2018 Task 1: Baseline Analysis – develop monitoring study work plan Prepare draft work plan March 19, 2018 April 16, 2018 City review of work plan April 17, 2018 May 1, 2018 Revise work plan per City comments May 2, 2018 May 9, 2018 Task 1: Baseline Analysis - field effort one field event per quarter for a year May 2018 April 2019 Task 1: Baseline Analysis – data report Prepare draft data report May 1, 2019 May 31, 2019 City review of data report June 3, 2019 June 14, 2019 Revise data report per City comments June 17, 2019 June 24, 2019 Task 2: Evaluation of Wetland Buffers Prepare draft deliverables March 1, 2018 April 2, 2018 City review of deliverables April 3, 2018 April 16, 2018 Revise deliverables per City comments April 17, 2018 April 24, 2018 Task 3: 2019 SMP Update Information Meet with City and prepare draft deliverables (text and map) August 16, 2018 September 7, 2018 City review of draft deliverables September 10, 2018 September 21, 2018 Revise deliverables per City comments September 24, 2018 September 28, 2018 Task 4: Analyze Impacts from Daylighting Willow Creek using REA/HEA model Develop model and draft tech memo February 1, 2019 March 1, 2019 City review of draft tech memo March 4, 2019 March 15, 2019 Revise tech memo per City comments March 18, 2019 March 25, 2019 Task 5: Vegetation Enhancement Project Impacts Draft tech memo June 1, 2018 June 22, 2018 City review of draft tech memo June 25, 2018 July 10, 2018 Revise tech memo per City comments July 11, 2018 July 18, 2018 Task 6: Preparation for a Long-term Watershed Management Study Meet with City and draft tech memo April 1, 2019 April 29, 2019 City review of draft tech memo May 1, 2019 May 15, 2019 Revise tech memo per City comments May16, 2019 May 30, 2019 7.1.b Packet Pg. 254 Attachment: Ex. 2: Windward Exhibit A [Revision 3] (Edmonds Marsh Study Professional Services Exhibit A: Edmonds Marsh Study SOW, Deliverables, and Schedule January 12, 2018 Page 8 Project Task/Milestone Estimated Initiation Date Estimated Completion Date Project completion July 31, 2019 7.1.b Packet Pg. 255 Attachment: Ex. 2: Windward Exhibit A [Revision 3] (Edmonds Marsh Study Professional Services EXHIBIT B Staff Role Rate Hours Cost Hours Cost Hours Cost Hours Cost Hours Cost Senior Advisor 195.00 16 3,120$ 16 3,120$ 16 3,120$ 14 2,730$ 62 12,090$ Project Manager 155.00 40 6,200$ 40 6,200$ 40 6,200$ 20 3,100$ 140 21,700$ Field Lead 110.00/140.00 40 5,600$ 120 13,200$ 24 3,360$ 184 22,160$ GIS Analyst 130.00 20 2,600$ 20 2,600$ 28 3,640$ 68 8,840$ Project Scientist 95.00/120.00 60 7,200$ 116 11,020$ 80 9,600$ 256 27,820$ Editorial Staff 125.00 20 2,500$ -$ 20 2,500$ 40 5,000$ Admininstrative Support 115.00 4 460$ 8 920$ 4 460$ 16 1,840$ Total Labor 200 27,680$ 320 37,060$ 212 28,880$ 34 5,830$ 766 99,450$ Other Direct Costs Field gear Water quality/level data loggers (7)$ 1,995 7 13,965$ 13,965$ Barometric pressure loggers (for WQ/water level data loggers) (3)$ 450 3 1,350$ 1,350$ YSI Professional Plus Multiparameter® water quality meter rental (unit/week)$ 330 4 1,320$ 1,320$ Sediment pH/ORP monitor (lump sum)$ 350 1 350$ 350$ Soil/sediment TOC and grain size analysis (per sample)$ 175 12 2,100$ 2,100$ High-precision GPS rental (unit/week)300$ 1 300$ 300$ Staff gage materials (lump sum)$ 300 1 300$ 300$ Wildlife cameras (3)$ 75 3 225$ 225$ Travel Mileage $ 0.530 111.3 59$ 59$ Total ODCs 19,969$ 19,969$ Total Costs 27,680$ 57,029$ 28,880$ 119,419$ Notes and Assumptions: Task 1 : Baseline Environmental Study - Design and Implementation Subtask 1 Subtask 2 Subtask 3 TotalWork Plan Development Field Work (4 events)Data Report Subtask 4 Attend City Council and Public Meetings Each deliverable will undergo one round of client review and subsequent revisions. The baseline monitoring work plan will be written so that it can also be used for future monitoring events. The study will include Edmonds Marsh and Shellabarger/Stella's Marsh. Project scientists will be charged at a rate of $95/hr for field work. The Field Lead will be charged at a rate of $110/hr for field work. Water level data loggers will be deployed continuously for the entire monitoring year. It will take 2 field staff 5 days (working 10 hour days) to establish baseline monitoring locations, deploy data loggers, and to collect monitoring data during the first (spring) event. It will take 2 field staff 3 days (working 10 hour days) to collect monitoring data during the second (summer) event. It will take 2 field staff 2 days (working 10 hour days) to collect monitoring data during the third (fall) event. It will take 2 field staff 1 day (working an 8-hour day) to collect monitoring data during the fourth (winter) event. Field work budget also includes one hour/month per water quality/level data logger for maintenance and calibration (for months when no other data collection is taking place). Windward will be responsible for collecting water level and water quality measurements, redox observations, and vegetation data. Windward will also note any incidental wildlife observations made while in the field, will deploy and maintain the wildlife cameras, and will take photos from the photo stations during each monitoring event. Citizen scientists (volunteers from the community) will help collect bird data (e.g., point count surveys), make additional wildlife observations, and possibly help with additional photos and measurements at the water level gage stations. Windward will help coordinate and oversee these efforts. Vegetation surveys will be conducted in spring and summer and will consist of 6 transects through the riparian/buffer zones up to the marsh edge, with 4 monitoring plots per transect. Vegetation within the marsh will be mapped using high-resolution aerial photos and ground truthing at strategic locations in the field. A high-precision GPS unit will be needed for one week at the beginning of the field effort to establish sampling locations to be visited throughout the monitoring year; the high-precision GPS will be able to produce sufficiently accurate locations coordinates and elevation information. A regular hand-held GPS unit will be sufficient for re-occupying sampling locations once they have been established. Seven water quality/level data loggers will be purchased to monitor water levels in the Marsh for extended periods of time throughout the monitoring year (it is likely that 5 will deployed and 2 will serve as spares). Three barometric pressure and temperature loggers, used to help establish the water quality loggers, will also be purchased. If the City of Edmonds purchases the loggers instead of Windward, these expenses will be subtracted from Windward's budget. 7.1.c Packet Pg. 256 Attachment: Ex. 3: Windward Exhibit B - Fee Schedule [Revision 3] (Edmonds Marsh Study Professional City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 02/6/2018 Discussion of current Council Committees and/or possible changes to those Committees Staff Lead: Mike Nelson Department: City Council Preparer: Maureen Judge Background/History N/A Staff Recommendation Discussion of current Council Committees and possible changes to those Committees. Narrative N/A 8.1 Packet Pg. 257