2018-02-20 City Council - Full Agenda-2056Agenda
Edmonds City Council
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
250 5TH AVE NORTH, EDMONDS, WA 98020
FEBRUARY 20, 2018, 7:00 PM
Edmonds City Council Agenda
February 20, 2018
Page 1
1. CALL TO ORDER/FLAG SALUTE
2. ROLL CALL
3. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA
4. PRESENTATIONS
1. Hearing Examiner Annual Report (15 min)
2. Update on Highway 99 Gateway Revitalization Project (30 min)
5. AUDIENCE COMMENTS (3-MINUTE LIMIT PER PERSON) - REGARDING MATTERS NOT LISTED ON
THE AGENDA AS CLOSED RECORD REVIEW OR AS PUBLIC HEARINGS
6. APPROVAL OF THE CONSENT AGENDA
1. Approval of Council Special Meeting Minutes of February 13, 2018
2. Approval of Council Meeting Minutes of February 13, 2018
3. Approval of claim checks, wire payment and payroll check.
4. Preliminary 2017 December Quarterly Financial Report
5. Authorization to award a construction contract for the Northstream Pipe Abandonment and
Culvert Rehabilitation Project (PPP committee referral)
6. Authorization for Mayor to sign an Interlocal Agreement with the Edmonds School District to
fund overlay of 236th St. from 94th Ave to 92nd Ave (PPP committee referral)
7. Authorization for Mayor to sign a Supplemental Agreement with Murraysmith (formerly MSA)
for Five Corners Reservoir Re-Coating Project (PPP committee referral)
8. 2018 Carryforward Budget Amendments
7. ACTION ITEMS
1. Crumb Rubber extension of moratorium (20 min)
2. Approval of Professional Services Agreement for the Edmonds Marsh Study (20 min)
3. ECC Amendment to Allow Boards/Commissions Remote Participation (10 min)
4. Discussion of current Council Committees and possible changes to those Committees (20 min)
8. REPORTS ON COUNCIL COMMITTEES
1. Council Committee Reports and Minutes (10 min)
9. MAYOR'S COMMENTS
10. COUNCIL COMMENTS
Edmonds City Council Agenda
February 20, 2018
Page 2
11. CONVENE IN EXECUTIVE SESSION REGARDING PENDING OR POTENTIAL LITIGATION PER RCW
42.30.110(1)(I).
12. RECONVENE IN OPEN SESSION. POTENTIAL ACTION AS A RESULT OF MEETING IN EXECUTIVE
SESSION.
ADJOURN
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 02/20/2018
Hearing Examiner Annual Report
Staff Lead: Shane Hope
Department: Planning Division
Preparer: Diane Cunningham
Background/History
Phil Olbrechts, Edmonds Hearing Examiner, will present his annual report. Mr. Olbrechts has been the
city Hearing Examiner since 2011.
Staff Recommendation
N/A
Narrative
City Council approved ordinance #4076 establishing the timing of the Hearing Examiner's Annual Report
to be given during the first quarter of each year.
4.1
Packet Pg. 3
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 02/20/2018
Update on Highway 99 Gateway Revitalization Project
Staff Lead: Rob English
Department: Engineering
Preparer: Megan Luttrell
Background/History
On September 5, 2017, Council authorized Mayor to sign a Local Agency Agreement with SCJ Alliance for
the Highway 99 Gateway Revitalization Project.
On January 23, 2018, staff presented this item to Parks, Planning and Public Works committee.
Staff Recommendation
For information only.
Narrative
The Highway 99 Gateway Revitalization project consists of extending the recent transformation of
Highway 99 in Shoreline through Edmonds. The scope of the project includes wider replacement
sidewalks, new street lighting, raised center medians for access management, safe and attractive
crosswalks, improved stormwater management, targeted utility replacements, potential
undergrounding of overhead utilities, landscaping, softscape treatments and other enhancements to
identify the area as being in Edmonds. Access management is being proposed due to the high accident
history from 216th St. SW to 224th St. SW (rest of corridor will also be assessed as part of this project).
The projects identified in the Edmonds Highway 99 Subarea Plan will be integrated into the project.
SCJ Alliance was selected to develop a corridor plan with project costs, environmental documentation,
and right of way requirements. Since the project began in September 2017, the consultant has worked
on the following tasks:
· Crash History along entire corridor;
· Preliminary cross-sections;
· Access management; and
· Urban Design Concepts.
A stakeholder meeting was held in January, with representatives from Lynnwood, Mountlake Terrace,
Snohomish County, Washington Department of Transportation, and Community Transit to update the
adjacent jurisdictions of the project. The Public Outreach will begin in February 2018 with an Open
House. Property owner meetings will follow thereafter because the project will involve access
modifications for nearly all properties along the corridor. A preliminary cost estimate to cover all the
improvements will be submitted in April 2018, allowing the City to apply for a Federal grant for
additional funds in the Design and /or ROW Phases in May 2018.
Attachments:
4.2
Packet Pg. 4
Presentation
4.2
Packet Pg. 5
City of Edmonds
Highway 99 Gateway-Revitalization Project
City Council Meeting
February 20, 2018
4.2.a
Packet Pg. 6 Attachment: Presentation [Revision 2] (Update on Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization Project)
Agenda
♦Edmonds Hwy 99 Subarea Plan
♦Project Introduction
♦Crash History
♦Access Management
♦Cross Sections
♦Urban Design Concepts
♦Related Projects
♦Outreach Plan
♦Schedule
2/15/2018SCJ Alliance | scjalliance.com 2
4.2.a
Packet Pg. 7 Attachment: Presentation [Revision 2] (Update on Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization Project)
Edmonds Hwy 99 Subarea Plan
♦Addressed future land use and transportation needs on and around the Highway 99 corridor
♦Identified Key Transportation
Improvements for all different modes
♦Identified 3 Districts
♦Gateway
♦International
♦Health
2/15/2018SCJ Alliance | scjalliance.com 3
4.2.a
Packet Pg. 8 Attachment: Presentation [Revision 2] (Update on Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization Project)
Project Introduction
♦244th St SW to 212th St SW
♦City Limits:
♦Edmonds
♦Esperance (Snohomish Co.)
♦Mountlake Terrace
♦Lynnwood
♦Interurban Trail
♦Lynnwood Link
2/15/2018SCJ Alliance | scjalliance.com 4
4.2.a
Packet Pg. 9 Attachment: Presentation [Revision 2] (Update on Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization Project)
Crash History
♦8.61 crashes per million miles traveled
2/15/2018SCJ Alliance | scjalliance.com 5
4.2.a
Packet Pg. 10 Attachment: Presentation [Revision 2] (Update on Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization Project)
Crash Diagram Legend
2/15/2018SCJ Alliance | scjalliance.com 6
4.2.a
Packet Pg. 11 Attachment: Presentation [Revision 2] (Update on Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization Project)
Crash Diagram –244th
and SR 104
2/15/2018SCJ Alliance | scjalliance.com 7
4.2.a
Packet Pg. 12 Attachment: Presentation [Revision 2] (Update on Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization Project)
Crash Diagram –236th
2/15/2018SCJ Alliance | scjalliance.com 8
4.2.a
Packet Pg. 13 Attachment: Presentation [Revision 2] (Update on Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization Project)
Crash Diagram –236th
to 232nd
2/15/2018SCJ Alliance | scjalliance.com 9
4.2.a
Packet Pg. 14 Attachment: Presentation [Revision 2] (Update on Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization Project)
Crash Diagram –232nd
to 228th
2/15/2018SCJ Alliance | scjalliance.com 10
4.2.a
Packet Pg. 15 Attachment: Presentation [Revision 2] (Update on Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization Project)
Crash Diagram –228th
to 224th
2/15/2018SCJ Alliance | scjalliance.com 11
4.2.a
Packet Pg. 16 Attachment: Presentation [Revision 2] (Update on Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization Project)
Crash Diagram –224th
to 220th
2/15/2018SCJ Alliance | scjalliance.com 12
4.2.a
Packet Pg. 17 Attachment: Presentation [Revision 2] (Update on Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization Project)
Crash Diagram –220th
2/15/2018SCJ Alliance | scjalliance.com 13
4.2.a
Packet Pg. 18 Attachment: Presentation [Revision 2] (Update on Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization Project)
Crash Diagram –216th
2/15/2018SCJ Alliance | scjalliance.com 14
4.2.a
Packet Pg. 19 Attachment: Presentation [Revision 2] (Update on Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization Project)
Crash Diagram –212th
2/15/2018SCJ Alliance | scjalliance.com 15
4.2.a
Packet Pg. 20 Attachment: Presentation [Revision 2] (Update on Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization Project)
Access Management
♦Median Control
♦Protected Left-turns
♦Protected Dual Left-Turns
♦212th –NB and SB
♦220th –NB and SB
♦238th –NB
♦Driveway Revisions
♦Relocate to locations with median openings
♦Consolidate multiple driveways
♦Move further from intersections
♦Combine with adjacent parcels
2/15/2018SCJ Alliance | scjalliance.com 16
4.2.a
Packet Pg. 21 Attachment: Presentation [Revision 2] (Update on Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization Project)
Cross Sections -Existing
2/15/2018SCJ Alliance | scjalliance.com 17
4.2.a
Packet Pg. 22 Attachment: Presentation [Revision 2] (Update on Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization Project)
Cross Sections -Existing
2/15/2018SCJ Alliance | scjalliance.com 18
4.2.a
Packet Pg. 23 Attachment: Presentation [Revision 2] (Update on Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization Project)
2/15/2018SCJ Alliance | scjalliance.com 19
URBAN DESIGN CONCEPTS
4.2.a
Packet Pg. 24 Attachment: Presentation [Revision 2] (Update on Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization Project)
2/15/2018SCJ Alliance | scjalliance.com 20
CONCEPT IDEAS
4.2.a
Packet Pg. 25 Attachment: Presentation [Revision 2] (Update on Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization Project)
2/15/2018SCJ Alliance | scjalliance.com 21
CONCEPT IDEAS
4.2.a
Packet Pg. 26 Attachment: Presentation [Revision 2] (Update on Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization Project)
2/15/2018SCJ Alliance | scjalliance.com 22
CONCEPT IDEAS
4.2.a
Packet Pg. 27 Attachment: Presentation [Revision 2] (Update on Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization Project)
2/15/2018SCJ Alliance | scjalliance.com 23
CONCEPT IDEAS CONCEPT IDEAS
4.2.a
Packet Pg. 28 Attachment: Presentation [Revision 2] (Update on Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization Project)
Related Projects
♦Edmonds/Lynnwood
♦212th Street SW Arterial Improvements♦216th Street SW Channelization Adjustments to Remove Split Phase Signal Timing
♦Snohomish County
♦None
♦Mountlake Terrace
♦220th Street SW –WB Right-turn Lane
♦WSDOT
♦Coordinate with SR 99 Paving Cycles
♦Community Transit
♦216th Street SW –Strengthen Connections to Swedish Hospital
♦Feasibility Study –Swift Blue Line Extension to 185th Street and to Link Station
2/15/2018SCJ Alliance | scjalliance.com 24
4.2.a
Packet Pg. 29 Attachment: Presentation [Revision 2] (Update on Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization Project)
Outreach Plan
♦Process
♦Stakeholder Meetings
♦Public Meetings
♦Council/Committee Meetings
♦Scoped Meetings
♦Jan 16 –Stakeholder Meeting (adjacent jurisdictions, CT, WSDOT)
♦Jan 23 –Parks, Planning, and Public Works Committee Meeting
♦Jan 25 –WSDOT Meeting
♦Feb 20 –City Council Meeting
♦March 7 –Public Open House
♦May 15–City Council Meeting
2/15/2018SCJ Alliance | scjalliance.com 25
4.2.a
Packet Pg. 30 Attachment: Presentation [Revision 2] (Update on Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization Project)
Schedule
2/15/2018SCJ Alliance | scjalliance.com 26
4.2.a
Packet Pg. 31 Attachment: Presentation [Revision 2] (Update on Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization Project)
Questions & Answers
2/15/2018SCJ Alliance | scjalliance.com 27
4.2.a
Packet Pg. 32 Attachment: Presentation [Revision 2] (Update on Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization Project)
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 02/20/2018
Approval of Council Special Meeting Minutes of February 13, 2018
Staff Lead: Scott Passey
Department: City Clerk's Office
Preparer: Scott Passey
Background/History
N/A
Staff Recommendation
Review and approve the draft meeting minutes on the Consent Agenda.
Narrative
N/A
Attachments:
02-13-2018 Draft Council Special Meeting Minutes
6.1
Packet Pg. 33
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
February 13, 2018
Page 1
+
EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING
DRAFT MINUTES
FEBRUARY 13, 2018
Elected Officials Present Staff Present
Dave Teitzel, Councilmember Carrie Hite, PRCS Director
Neil Tibbott, Councilmember Jeff Taraday, City Attorney
Kristiana Johnson, Councilmember
Diane Buckshnis, Council President Pro Tem
Tom Mesaros, Councilmember
Adrienne Fraley-Monillas, Councilmember
Mike Nelson, Mayor Pro Tem
Elected Officials Absent
Dave Earling, Mayor
1. CALL TO ORDER/CONVENE IN JURY MEETING ROOM
At 6:45 p.m., the City Council Special Meeting was called to order by Mayor Pro Tem Nelson in
the Council Chambers, 250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds.
2. EXECUTIVE SESSION: PENDING OR POTENTIAL LITIGATION PER RCW
42.30.110(1)(I).
The City Council then adjourned to the Jury Meeting Room in executive session to discuss pending
or potential litigation.
EXTENSION
At 7:00 p.m., the executive session was extended for five minutes.
ADJOURN
At 7:02p.m., the executive session concluded and the meeting adjourned.
6.1.a
Packet Pg. 34 Attachment: 02-13-2018 Draft Council Special Meeting Minutes (Approval of Council Special Meeting Minutes)
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 02/20/2018
Approval of Council Meeting Minutes of February 13, 2018
Staff Lead: Scott Passey, City Clerk
Department: City Clerk's Office
Preparer: Scott Passey
Background/History
N/A
Staff Recommendation
Review and approve the draft meeting minutes on the Consent Agenda.
Narrative
N/A
Attachments:
E021318
6.2
Packet Pg. 35
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
February 13, 2018
Page 1
EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL DRAFT MINUTES
February 13, 2018
ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT
Michael Nelson, Mayor Pro Tem
Diane Buckshnis, Council President Pro Tem
Kristiana Johnson, Councilmember
Thomas Mesaros, Councilmember
Adrienne Fraley-Monillas, Councilmember
Dave Teitzel, Councilmember
Neil Tibbott, Councilmember
ELECTED OFFICIALS ABSENT
Dave Earling, Mayor
STAFF PRESENT
Al Compaan, Police Chief
Phil Williams, Public Works Director
Carrie Hite, Parks, Rec. & Cult. Serv. Dir.
Patrick Doherty, Econ. Dev & Comm. Serv. Dir.
Scott James, Finance Director
Mary Ann Hardie, HR Director
Dave Turley, Assistant Finance Director
Rob English, City Engineer
Jeff Taraday, City Attorney
Scott Passey, City Clerk
Jerrie Bevington, Camera Operator
Jeannie Dines, Recorder
1. CALL TO ORDER/FLAG SALUTE
The Edmonds City Council meeting was called to order at 7:03 p.m. by Mayor Pro Tem Nelson in the
Council Chambers, 250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds. The meeting was opened with the flag salute.
2. ROLL CALL
City Clerk Scott Passey called the roll. All elected officials were present with the exception of Mayor
Earling.
3. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA
COUNCILMEMBER MESAROS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL, TO
APPROVE THE AGENDA IN CONTENT AND ORDER.
COUNCILMEMBER TIBBOTT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER MESAROS, TO
AMEND TO ADD COUNCIL COMMITTEE ROOM ASSIGNMENTS AS ITEM 5.1. AMENDMENT
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
MAIN MOTION AS AMENDED CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
4. APPROVAL OF THE CONSENT AGENDA
COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL, TO
APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. The agenda items
approved are as follows:
1. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 6, 2018
2. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 6, 2018
6.2.a
Packet Pg. 36 Attachment: E021318 (Approval of Council Meeting Minutes)
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
February 13, 2018
Page 2
3. ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT OF A CLAIM FOR DAMAGES FROM EDNA BURGEN
(AMOUNT UNDETERMINED)
4. APPROVAL OF CLAIM AND REPLACEMENT PAYROLL CHECKS
5. EPOA -LAW SUPPORT COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENT (1/1/17-12/31/19)
6. RESOLUTION FOR SERS FUNDING
5. ACTION ITEM
1. COUNCIL COMMITTEE ROOM ASSIGNMENTS
Councilmember Tibbott recalled the Council previously discussed room assignments for committee
meetings. As the Parks, Planning & Public Works (PPP) Committee often has citizens attending meetings,
it would be helpful to hold the meeting in a space larger than the Jury Meeting Room.
COUNCILMEMBER MESAROS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY-
MONILLAS, TO HAVE THE PARKS, PLANNING & PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE MEET IN
THE POLICE TRAINING ROOM AND THE PUBLIC SAFETY & PERSONNEL COMMITTEE
MEET IN THE JURY MEETING ROOM.
Council President Pro Tem Buckshnis did not support the motion as she preferred the Finance Committee
meet in the Jury Meeting Room, recalling that was the location for many years. She suggested the PPP
Committee meet in Council Chambers, commenting it may be difficult for the public wishing to attend a
PPP Committee meeting to find the Police Training Room.
Councilmember Johnson concurred with Councilmember Buckshnis, preferring the PPP Committee meet
in Council Chambers.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas suggested trying the proposed locations tonight and if it works well,
putting notices on the door on committee nights identifying where the committees are meeting.
UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION CARRIED (4-3), MAYOR PRO TEM NELSON AND
COUNCILMEMBERS FRALEY-MONILLAS, MESAROS, AND TIBBOTT VOTING YES; AND
COUNCILMEMBERS JOHNSON AND TEITZEL AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT PRO TEM
BUCKSHNIS VOTING NO.
6. ADJOURN TO COMMITTEE MEETINGS
With no further business, the Council meeting was adjourned to committee meetings at 7:10 p.m. (Parks,
Planning & Public Works Committee in the Police Training Room, Finance Committee in Council
Chambers and Public Safety & Personnel Committee in the Jury Meeting Room.)
6.2.a
Packet Pg. 37 Attachment: E021318 (Approval of Council Meeting Minutes)
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 02/20/2018
Approval of claim checks, wire payment and payroll check.
Staff Lead: Scott James
Department: Administrative Services
Preparer: Nori Jacobson
Background/History
Approval of claim checks #229786 through #229897 dated February 15, 2018 for $427,763.21 and wire
payment of $301.00. Approval of payroll check #63164 dated February 13, 2018 for $343.15.
Staff Recommendation
Approval of claim checks, wire payment and payroll check.
Narrative
In accordance with the State statutes, City payments must be approved by the City Council. Ordinance
#2896 delegates this approval to the Council President who reviews and recommends either approval or
non-approval of expenditures.
Attachments:
claim cks 02-15-18
wire 02-06-18
FrequentlyUsedProjNumbers 02-15-18
payroll summary 02-13-18
6.3
Packet Pg. 38
02/14/2018Voucher ListCity of Edmonds1 2:56:51PMPage:vchlistBank code :usbankVoucherDateVendorInvoicePO #Description/AccountAmount229786 2/15/2018070322 A&A LANGUAGE SERVICES INC 15-57161MONGOLIAN INTERPRETER COURT 01/17/2018MONGOLIAN INTERPRETER COURT 01/17/2018001.000.23.512.50.41.01 167.80AMHARIC/TIGRINYA INTERPRETER COURT15-57387AMHARIC/TIGRINYA INTERPRETER COURT001.000.23.512.50.41.01 172.70SPANISH INTERPRETER PROBATION15-57590SPANISH INTERPRETER PROBATION001.000.23.523.30.41.01 170.52SPANISH INTERPRETER PUB DEF 01/23/201815-57673SPANISH INTERPRETER PUB DEF 01/23/2018001.000.23.512.50.41.01 183.60MANDARIN INTERPRETER PUB DEF 01/23/201815-57674MANDARIN INTERPRETER PUB DEF 01/23/2018001.000.23.512.50.41.01 174.88SPANISH INTERPRETER PUB DEF 7Z094875415-57774SPANISH INTERPRETER PUB DEF 7Z0948754001.000.23.512.50.41.01 183.60SPANISH INTERPRETER COURT 01/24/201815-58072SPANISH INTERPRETER COURT 01/24/2018001.000.23.512.50.41.01 170.52LITHUANIAN INTERPRETER COURT 01/31/201815-58324LITHUANIAN INTERPRETER COURT 01/31/2018001.000.23.512.50.41.01 160.90Total :1,384.52229787 2/15/2018075836 AAKAVS CONSULTING LLC EDMONDS/2018/01WATER/SEWER/STREET/STORM - 2018 ANNUALWATER/SEWER/STREET/STORM - 2018 ANNUAL111.000.68.542.90.41.00 2,750.00WATER/SEWER/STREET/STORM - 2018 ANNUAL422.000.72.531.90.41.00 2,750.00WATER/SEWER/STREET/STORM - 2018 ANNUAL421.000.74.534.80.41.00 2,750.00WATER/SEWER/STREET/STORM - 2018 ANNUAL423.000.75.535.80.41.00 2,750.001Page:6.3.aPacket Pg. 39Attachment: claim cks 02-15-18 (Approval of claim checks, wire payment and payroll check.)
02/14/2018Voucher ListCity of Edmonds2 2:56:51PMPage:vchlistBank code :usbankVoucherDateVendorInvoicePO #Description/AccountAmount229787 2/15/2018(Continued)075836 AAKAVS CONSULTING LLC10.3% Sales Tax111.000.68.542.90.41.00 283.2510.3% Sales Tax422.000.72.531.90.41.00 283.2510.3% Sales Tax421.000.74.534.80.41.00 283.2510.3% Sales Tax423.000.75.535.80.41.00 283.25Total :12,133.00229788 2/15/2018065052 AARD PEST CONTROL 397750MEADOWDALE CC PEST CONTROL CUST 1-23276MEADOWDALE CC PEST CONTROL CUST 1-23276001.000.64.576.80.41.00 88.24PM & SENIOR CENTER PEST CONTROL CUST 1-1397786PM & SENIOR CENTER PEST CONTROL CUST001.000.64.576.80.41.00 137.88Total :226.12229789 2/15/2018061029 ABSOLUTE GRAPHIX 2188351P&R LEAGUE SHIRTS VOLLEYBALLP&R LEAGUE SHIRTS001.000.64.571.25.31.00 42.9010.4% Sales Tax001.000.64.571.25.31.00 4.46P&R LEAGUE SHIRTS PICKLE-BALL2188352P&R LEAGUE SHIRTS001.000.64.571.25.31.00 57.2010.4% Sales Tax001.000.64.571.25.31.00 5.95Total :110.51229790 2/15/2018075470 ACCELA INC INV-ACC36680LEGISLATIVE MANAGEMENT - AGENDA & MINUTELEGISLATIVE MANAGEMENT - AGENDA &001.000.25.514.30.48.00 1,417.51Total :1,417.512Page:6.3.aPacket Pg. 40Attachment: claim cks 02-15-18 (Approval of claim checks, wire payment and payroll check.)
02/14/2018Voucher ListCity of Edmonds3 2:56:51PMPage:vchlistBank code :usbankVoucherDateVendorInvoicePO #Description/AccountAmount229791 2/15/2018076229 ADAMS RESOURCE CONSULTANTS CO 19560438HICKMAN REVIEW FINAL INVOICEHICKMAN REVIEW FINAL INVOICE125.000.64.594.76.65.41 4,104.00Total :4,104.00229792 2/15/2018074143 AFFORDABLE WA BACKFLOW TESTING 174852017 BACKFLOW TESTS2017 BACKFLOW TESTS001.000.64.576.80.41.00 180.00Total :180.00229793 2/15/2018000850 ALDERWOOD WATER DISTRICT 10222MONTHLY WHOLESALE WATER CHARGESMONTHLY WHOLESALE WATER CHARGES421.000.74.534.80.33.00 105,994.71Total :105,994.71229794 2/15/2018065568 ALLWATER INC 012418050FINANCE DEPT WATERFinance dept water001.000.31.514.23.31.00 19.69FINANCE DEPT WATER020718003Finance dept water001.000.31.514.23.31.00 48.20WWTP: 2/7/18 DRINK WATER SERVICE0207180042/7/18 Water services, rental &423.000.76.535.80.31.00 20.9010.3% Sales Tax423.000.76.535.80.31.00 2.15Total :90.94229795 2/15/2018076455 AMERICAN STAR PLUMBING BLD20180104 REFUND WRONG ITEM LISTEDRefund, wrong item listed on permit001.000.257.620 12.00Total :12.00229796 2/15/2018069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 1990558455FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMSFACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS001.000.66.518.30.24.00 32.573Page:6.3.aPacket Pg. 41Attachment: claim cks 02-15-18 (Approval of claim checks, wire payment and payroll check.)
02/14/2018Voucher ListCity of Edmonds4 2:56:51PMPage:vchlistBank code :usbankVoucherDateVendorInvoicePO #Description/AccountAmount229796 2/15/2018(Continued)069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES10.3% Sales Tax001.000.66.518.30.24.00 3.35WWTP: 2/7/18 UNIFORMS,TOWELS+MATS1990568834Mats/Towels423.000.76.535.80.41.00 115.98Uniforms423.000.76.535.80.24.00 5.1010.3% Sales Tax423.000.76.535.80.41.00 11.9510.3% Sales Tax423.000.76.535.80.24.00 0.52PARKS MAINT UNIFORM SERVICE1990568835PARKS MAINT UNIFORM SERVICE001.000.64.576.80.24.00 56.86PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS1990572687PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS001.000.65.518.20.41.00 1.61PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS421.000.74.534.80.41.00 6.11PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS422.000.72.531.90.41.00 6.11PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS423.000.75.535.80.41.00 6.11PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS511.000.77.548.68.41.00 6.0810.3% Sales Tax001.000.65.518.20.41.00 0.3310.3% Sales Tax111.000.68.542.90.41.00 0.6610.3% Sales Tax421.000.74.534.80.41.00 0.6610.3% Sales Tax422.000.72.531.90.41.00 0.6610.3% Sales Tax4Page:6.3.aPacket Pg. 42Attachment: claim cks 02-15-18 (Approval of claim checks, wire payment and payroll check.)
02/14/2018Voucher ListCity of Edmonds5 2:56:51PMPage:vchlistBank code :usbankVoucherDateVendorInvoicePO #Description/AccountAmount229796 2/15/2018(Continued)069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES423.000.75.535.80.41.00 0.6610.3% Sales Tax511.000.77.548.68.41.00 0.34PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS111.000.68.542.90.41.00 6.11FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS & MATS1990572688FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS511.000.77.548.68.24.00 5.68FLEET DIVISION MATS511.000.77.548.68.41.00 18.4010.3% Sales Tax511.000.77.548.68.24.00 1.3010.3% Sales Tax511.000.77.548.68.41.00 1.18Total :288.33229797 2/15/2018071124 ASSOCIATED PETROLEUM 1201103-INWWTP: 2/1/18 DIESEL FUELULSD #2 DYED - BULK fuel (includes423.000.76.535.80.32.00 2,569.3410.3% Sales Tax423.000.76.535.80.32.00 264.65Total :2,833.99229798 2/15/2018064807 ATS AUTOMATION INC S 094410ALERTON SYSTEM - PW - PM CONTRACTALERTON SYSTEM - PW - PM CONTRACT001.000.66.518.30.48.00 2,866.5010.3% Sales Tax001.000.66.518.30.48.00 295.25Total :3,161.75229799 2/15/2018066891 BEACON PUBLISHING INC 28202CEMETERY ADCEMETERY AD130.000.64.536.20.41.40 176.00Total :176.005Page:6.3.aPacket Pg. 43Attachment: claim cks 02-15-18 (Approval of claim checks, wire payment and payroll check.)
02/14/2018Voucher ListCity of Edmonds6 2:56:51PMPage:vchlistBank code :usbankVoucherDateVendorInvoicePO #Description/AccountAmount229800 2/15/2018073041 BECK & ASSOCIATES PLLC 2018-EDM-1 PLAN REVIEW BLD20171835Plan review BLD20171835001.000.62.524.20.41.00 1,537.65Total :1,537.65229801 2/15/2018069226 BHC CONSULTANTS LLC 9575E5JB.SERVICES THRU 1/26/18E5JB.Services thru 1/26/18421.000.74.594.34.65.41 2,749.91E5JB.Services thru 1/26/18423.200.75.594.35.65.41 2,749.91E5JB.Services thru 1/26/18422.000.72.594.31.65.41 2,749.90Total :8,249.72229802 2/15/2018073760 BLUELINE GROUP LLC 14510E6JC.SERVICES THRU JANUARY 2018E6JC.Services thru January 2018421.000.74.594.34.65.41 15,306.25E6JB.SERVICES THRU JANUARY 201814511E6JB.Services thru January 2018421.000.74.594.34.65.41 20,197.60E7JA.SERVICES THRU JANUARY 201814530E7JA.Services thru January 2018421.000.74.594.34.65.41 22,503.50Total :58,007.35229803 2/15/2018072005 BROCKMANN, KERRY WINTER SPRING YOGA6301 6304 6307 6310 6313 6316 6321 YOGA6301 YOGA INSTRUCTION001.000.64.571.27.41.00 646.806304 YOGA INSTRUCTION001.000.64.571.27.41.00 486.206307 YOGA INSTRUCTION001.000.64.571.27.41.00 424.056310 YOGA INSTRUCTION001.000.64.571.27.41.00 958.656313 YOGA INSTRUCTION001.000.64.571.27.41.00 757.356Page:6.3.aPacket Pg. 44Attachment: claim cks 02-15-18 (Approval of claim checks, wire payment and payroll check.)
02/14/2018Voucher ListCity of Edmonds7 2:56:51PMPage:vchlistBank code :usbankVoucherDateVendorInvoicePO #Description/AccountAmount229803 2/15/2018(Continued)072005 BROCKMANN, KERRY6316 YOGA INSTRUCTION001.000.64.571.27.41.00 517.376321 YOGA INSTRUCTION001.000.64.571.27.41.00 460.35Total :4,250.77229804 2/15/2018074776 BUCKSHNIS, DIANE 02/04/18REIMBURSEMENT FOR TRAVELWRIA8 Meeting001.000.11.511.60.43.00 45.49Total :45.49229805 2/15/2018 075874 BULGER SAFE & LOCK 37413FAC - LOCK SUPPLIESFAC - Lock Supplies001.000.66.518.30.31.00 300.0010.1 % Sales Tax001.000.66.518.30.31.00 30.30Total :330.30229806 2/15/2018076240 CADMAN MATERIALS INC 5490232ROADWAY - ASPHALTRoadway - Asphalt111.000.68.542.31.31.00 778.5010.0% Sales Tax111.000.68.542.31.31.00 77.85Total :856.35229807 2/15/2018071816 CARLSON, JESSICA 6173 DRAWING6173 ADVENTURES IN DRAWING INSTRUCTION6173 ADVENTURES IN DRAWING INSTRUCTION001.000.64.571.22.41.00 519.206263 ADVENTURES IN ANIME INSTRUCTION6263 ANIME6263 ADVENTURES IN ANIME INSTRUCTION001.000.64.571.22.41.00 82.50Total :601.70229808 2/15/2018067446 CEM CORPORATION 580390WWTP: SOLUTION KITS/APPLICATIONSOLUTION KITS/APPLICATION7Page:6.3.aPacket Pg. 45Attachment: claim cks 02-15-18 (Approval of claim checks, wire payment and payroll check.)
02/14/2018Voucher ListCity of Edmonds8 2:56:51PMPage:vchlistBank code :usbankVoucherDateVendorInvoicePO #Description/AccountAmount229808 2/15/2018(Continued)067446 CEM CORPORATION423.000.76.535.80.31.00 124.00Freight423.000.76.535.80.31.00 24.8710.3% Sales Tax423.000.76.535.80.31.00 15.33Total :164.20229809 2/15/2018 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY RN0118004WWTP: CYLINDER RENTAL+HAZMAT CHG nitrogen, oxygen, carbon monoxide +423.000.76.535.80.31.00 101.2510.3% Sales Tax423.000.76.535.80.31.00 10.43GYMNASTICS HELIUMRN01181003GYMNASTICS HELIUM001.000.64.571.28.45.00 15.2510.3% Sales Tax001.000.64.571.28.45.00 1.57WWTP: REGULATORS/OUTLETS/NIPPLESXC27890REGULATORS/OUTLETS/NIPPLES423.000.76.535.80.48.00 754.5010.3% Sales Tax423.000.76.535.80.48.00 77.71Total :960.71229810 2/15/2018065519 CITY OF LYNNWOOD 13571INV#13571 CUST#200966 - EDMONDS PD1/2 NARC SGT SAL & BEN - 3RD QTR104.000.41.521.21.51.00 15,976.47INV#13823 CUST#200966 - EDMONDS PD138231/2 NARCS SGT SAL & BEN - 4TH QTR104.000.41.521.21.51.00 16,962.40Total :32,938.87229811 2/15/2018004867 COOPER, JACK F 17REIMBURSEMENTREIMBURSEMENT617.000.51.517.20.23.00 1,363.678Page:6.3.aPacket Pg. 46Attachment: claim cks 02-15-18 (Approval of claim checks, wire payment and payroll check.)
02/14/2018Voucher ListCity of Edmonds9 2:56:51PMPage:vchlistBank code :usbankVoucherDateVendorInvoicePO #Description/AccountAmount(Continued)Total :1,363.67229811 2/15/2018 004867 004867 COOPER, JACK F229812 2/15/2018 073759 CRITERION PICTURES USA INC 425049aOUTDOOR MOVIE LICENSE KUNG FU PANDAOUTDOOR MOVIE LICENSE KUNG FU PANDA001.000.64.571.22.49.00 300.00Total :300.00229813 2/15/2018005965 CUES INC 497444SEWER - CAMERASewer - Camera423.000.75.535.80.31.00 3,320.64Freight423.000.75.535.80.31.00 84.8110.3% Sales Tax423.000.75.535.80.31.00 350.77SEWER TRUCK CAMERA SOFTWARE500146Sewer Truck Camera Software and Support423.000.75.535.80.49.00 3,200.00Total :6,956.22229814 2/15/2018063519 CUZ CONCRETE PRODUCTS INC 248791STORM - 10 CONCRETE CATCH BASINSStorm - 10 Concrete Catch Basins422.000.72.531.40.31.00 1,612.40Fuel Surcharge422.000.72.531.40.31.00 27.5010.3% Sales Tax422.000.72.531.40.31.00 168.91Total :1,808.81229815 2/15/2018006200 DAILY JOURNAL OF COMMERCE 3333204E6DA.INVITATION TO BID ADVERTISEMENTE6DA.Invitation to Bid Advertisement112.000.68.595.61.65.41 540.00Total :540.00229816 2/15/2018074444 DATAQUEST LLC CIEDMONDS CREDIT CHECKS - JAN 2018Credit Checks for January001.000.22.521.10.41.00 40.009Page:6.3.aPacket Pg. 47Attachment: claim cks 02-15-18 (Approval of claim checks, wire payment and payroll check.)
02/14/2018Voucher ListCity of Edmonds10 2:56:51PMPage:vchlistBank code :usbankVoucherDateVendorInvoicePO #Description/AccountAmount(Continued)Total :40.00229816 2/15/2018 074444 074444 DATAQUEST LLC229817 2/15/2018 047450 DEPT OF INFORMATION SERVICES2018010041CUSTOMER ID# D200-0 SWV#0098113-06Scan Services for January 2018512.000.31.518.88.42.00 285.00Total :285.00229818 2/15/2018064531 DINES, JEANNIE 18-38282/6/18 CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES2/06/2018 CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES001.000.25.514.30.41.00 336.60Total :336.60229819 2/15/2018076172 DK SYSTEMS 20007FS 16 - REPAIRS AND MAINTFS 16 - Repairs and Maint001.000.66.518.30.48.00 420.0010.3% Sales Tax001.000.66.518.30.48.00 43.26MUSEUM - MAINT20123Museum - Maint001.000.66.518.30.48.00 140.0010.3% Sales Tax001.000.66.518.30.48.00 14.42CITY PARKS BLDG - MAINT20124City Parks Bldg - Maint001.000.66.518.30.48.00 210.0010.3% Sales Tax001.000.66.518.30.48.00 21.63Total :849.31229820 2/15/2018065739 DTG ENTERPRISES INC 12347STORM DUMP FEESStorm Dump Fees422.000.72.531.10.49.00 120.00Total :120.00229821 2/15/2018 007253 DUNN LUMBER 5305757PM: SCREWS, TAPE MEASURE ACCT E000027PM: SCREWS, TAPE MEASURE001.000.64.576.81.31.00 47.0610Page:6.3.aPacket Pg. 48Attachment: claim cks 02-15-18 (Approval of claim checks, wire payment and payroll check.)
02/14/2018Voucher ListCity of Edmonds11 2:56:51PMPage:vchlistBank code :usbankVoucherDateVendorInvoicePO #Description/AccountAmount229821 2/15/2018(Continued)007253 DUNN LUMBERPM: LEVEL, SHOVEL ACCT E0000275322000PM: LEVEL, SHOVEL001.000.64.576.80.31.00 24.54Total :71.60229822 2/15/2018038500 EDMONDS SENIOR CENTER 2018-02-0102/18 RECREATION SERVICES CONTRACT FEE02/18 Recreation Services Contract Fee001.000.39.569.10.41.00 6,250.00Total :6,250.00229823 2/15/2018 068803 EJ USA INC 110180008487 STORM - VANE GRATESStorm - Vane Grates422.000.72.531.40.31.00 2,178.4810.3% Sales Tax422.000.72.531.40.31.00 224.38Total :2,402.86229824 2/15/2018008969 ENGLAND, CHARLES 6154 6156 DANCE 6154 6156 DANCE INSTRUCTION6154 DANCE INSTRUCTION001.000.64.571.22.41.00 150.006156 DANCE INSTRUCTION001.000.64.571.22.41.00 384.00Total :534.00229825 2/15/2018009350 EVERETT DAILY HERALD EDH793829E6DA.INVITATION TO BID ADVERTISEMENTE6DA.Invitation to Bid Advertisement112.000.68.595.61.65.41 227.04E4FE.SEPA ADVERTISEMENTEDH794307E4FE.SEPA Advertisement422.000.72.594.31.65.41 89.44LEGAL AD PLN20170063EDH794703legal ad PLN20170063001.000.62.558.60.41.40 61.92Total :378.40229826 2/15/2018066378 FASTENAL COMPANY WAMOU47808 PM: SUPPLIES11Page:6.3.aPacket Pg. 49Attachment: claim cks 02-15-18 (Approval of claim checks, wire payment and payroll check.)
02/14/2018Voucher ListCity of Edmonds12 2:56:51PMPage:vchlistBank code :usbankVoucherDateVendorInvoicePO #Description/AccountAmount229826 2/15/2018(Continued)066378 FASTENAL COMPANYPM: SUPPLIES001.000.64.576.80.31.00 188.4410.3% Sales Tax001.000.64.576.80.31.00 19.41Total :207.85229827 2/15/2018009815 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC 0584581WATER PARTSWater Parts421.000.74.534.80.31.00 65.7110.3% Sales Tax421.000.74.534.80.31.00 6.77Total :72.48229828 2/15/2018071562 FORMA145602WOTS 2018 PRINT ADWOTS 2018 PRINT AD123.000.64.573.20.41.40 1,715.00Total :1,715.00229829 2/15/2018011900 FRONTIER 253-011-1177 PUBLIC WORKS OMC RADIO LINEPUBLIC WORKS OMC RADIO LINE TO FIVE001.000.65.518.20.42.00 6.42PUBLIC WORKS OMC RADIO LINE TO FIVE111.000.68.542.90.42.00 24.40PUBLIC WORKS OMC RADIO LINE TO FIVE421.000.74.534.80.42.00 24.40PUBLIC WORKS OMC RADIO LINE TO FIVE423.000.75.535.80.42.00 24.40PUBLIC WORKS OMC RADIO LINE TO FIVE511.000.77.548.68.42.00 24.40PUBLIC WORKS OMC RADIO LINE TO FIVE422.000.72.531.90.42.00 24.41WWTP: 2/7-3/6/18 AFTER HR BUS. LINE425-712-0423WWTP: 2/7-3/6/18 AFTER HOUR BUSINESS423.000.76.535.80.42.00 73.12CLUBHOUSE ALARM LINES 6801 MEADOWDALE RD425-745-431312Page:6.3.aPacket Pg. 50Attachment: claim cks 02-15-18 (Approval of claim checks, wire payment and payroll check.)
02/14/2018Voucher ListCity of Edmonds13 2:56:51PMPage:vchlistBank code :usbankVoucherDateVendorInvoicePO #Description/AccountAmount229829 2/15/2018(Continued)011900 FRONTIERCLUBHOUSE FIRE AND INTRUSION ALARM001.000.66.518.30.42.00 133.36425-771-4741 CEMETERY PHONE/INTERNET425-771-4741425-771-4741 CEMETERY PHONE/INTERNET130.000.64.536.20.42.00 128.66LIFT STATION #8 VG SPECIAL ACCESS LINES425-774-1031LIFT STATION #8 TWO VOICE GRADE SPECIAL423.000.75.535.80.42.00 47.45425-775-1344 RANGER STATION425-775-1344425-775-1344 RANGER STATION001.000.64.571.23.42.00 68.07UTILITY BILLING RADIO LINE425-775-7865UTILITY BILLING RADIO LINE TO FIVE421.000.74.534.80.42.00 67.86SNO-ISLE LIBRARY ELEVATOR PHONE LINE425-776-1281SNO-ISLE LIBRARY ELEVATOR PHONE LINE001.000.66.518.30.42.00 55.26LIFT STATION #7 VG SPECIAL ACCESS LINE425-776-2742LIFT STATION #7 V/G SPECIAL ACCESS LINE423.000.75.535.80.42.00 26.40425-776-5316 PARKS MAINT FAX LINE425-776-5316425-776-5316 PARKS MAINT FAX LINE001.000.64.576.80.42.00 102.41Total :831.02229830 2/15/2018 071467 GATEWAY PET MEMORIAL WA70014-I-0005INV#WA70014-I-0005 - EDMONDS PD1 ANIMAL DISPOSAL @ $12.47 1/11/18001.000.41.521.70.41.00 12.47Total :12.47229831 2/15/2018012199 GRAINGER 9689778612WATER - SUPPLIESWater - Supplies421.000.74.534.80.31.00 477.9010.3% Sales Tax421.000.74.534.80.31.00 49.2213Page:6.3.aPacket Pg. 51Attachment: claim cks 02-15-18 (Approval of claim checks, wire payment and payroll check.)
02/14/2018Voucher ListCity of Edmonds14 2:56:51PMPage:vchlistBank code :usbankVoucherDateVendorInvoicePO #Description/AccountAmount(Continued)Total :527.12229831 2/15/2018 012199 012199 GRAINGER229832 2/15/2018 012555 H & L SPORTING GOODS 815195SOFTBALLSSOFTBALLS001.000.64.571.25.31.00 4,980.0010.4% Sales Tax001.000.64.571.25.31.00 517.92Total :5,497.92229833 2/15/2018076333 HASA INC 536458WWTP: SODIUM HYPOCHLORITESODIUM HYPOCHLORITE423.000.76.535.80.31.53 2,464.9210.3% Sales Tax423.000.76.535.80.31.53 253.89Total :2,718.81229834 2/15/2018010900 HD FOWLER CO INC I4737192WATER INVENTORY - #0573AWater Inventory - #0573A421.000.74.534.80.34.20 1,546.3210.3% Sales Tax421.000.74.534.80.34.20 159.27Total :1,705.59229835 2/15/2018072647 HERRERA ENVIRONMENTAL 41772EDMONDS WATERFRONT REDEVELOPMENTEDMONDS WATERFRONT REDEVELOPMENT125.000.64.594.76.65.41 293.85Total :293.85229836 2/15/2018074746 HIGUCHI, ROD 6329 UKULELE 6329 UKULELE INSTRUCTION6329 UKULELE INSTRUCTION001.000.64.571.22.41.00 445.50Total :445.50229837 2/15/2018 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 1020395CITY HALL - 2ND FLR ENG KITCHEN DRAINCity Hall - 2nd Flr Eng Kitchen Drain001.000.66.518.30.31.00 64.2210.0% Sales Tax14Page:6.3.aPacket Pg. 52Attachment: claim cks 02-15-18 (Approval of claim checks, wire payment and payroll check.)
02/14/2018Voucher ListCity of Edmonds15 2:56:51PMPage:vchlistBank code :usbankVoucherDateVendorInvoicePO #Description/AccountAmount229837 2/15/2018(Continued)067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES001.000.66.518.30.31.00 6.42FS 20 - SUPPLIES1020455FS 20 - Supplies001.000.66.518.30.31.00 30.2610.0% Sales Tax001.000.66.518.30.31.00 3.02BOYS & GIRLS CLUB - SUPPLIES13259Boys & Girls Club - Supplies001.000.66.518.30.31.00 13.0710.0% Sales Tax001.000.66.518.30.31.00 1.31PS - SUPPLIES2010202PS - Supplies001.000.66.518.30.31.00 246.2210.0% Sales Tax001.000.66.518.30.31.00 24.62FS 16 - SUPPLIES2014274FS 16 - Supplies001.000.66.518.30.31.00 34.7010.0% Sales Tax001.000.66.518.30.31.00 3.46CITY PARK BLDG - SUPPLIES20564City Park Bldg - Supplies001.000.66.518.30.31.00 72.5810.0% Sales Tax001.000.66.518.30.31.00 7.26WATER - SUPPLIES2086142Water - Supplies421.000.74.534.80.31.00 17.9810.0% Sales Tax421.000.74.534.80.31.00 1.80CITY PARK BLDG SHOP SUPPLIES26436City Park Bldg Shop Supplies001.000.66.518.30.31.00 83.3115Page:6.3.aPacket Pg. 53Attachment: claim cks 02-15-18 (Approval of claim checks, wire payment and payroll check.)
02/14/2018Voucher ListCity of Edmonds16 2:56:51PMPage:vchlistBank code :usbankVoucherDateVendorInvoicePO #Description/AccountAmount229837 2/15/2018(Continued)067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES10.0% Sales Tax001.000.66.518.30.31.00 8.32FAC MAINT SHOP AND TRUCK SUPPLIES3010026Fac Maint Shop and Truck Supplies001.000.66.518.30.31.00 42.9410.0% Sales Tax001.000.66.518.30.31.00 4.29MCH - SUPPLIES3012929MCH - Supplies001.000.66.518.30.31.00 36.2510.0% Sales Tax001.000.66.518.30.31.00 3.63STORM - PARTS FOR CIB INSTALL3560651Storm - Parts for CIB Install422.000.72.531.40.31.00 13.0710.0% Sales Tax422.000.72.531.40.31.00 1.31FAC MAINT SHOP SUPPLIES402127210.0% Sales Tax001.000.66.518.30.31.00 14.25Fac Maint Shop Supplies001.000.66.518.30.31.00 142.56FAC MAINT SHOP SUPPLIES5021173Fac Maint Shop Supplies001.000.66.518.30.31.00 58.8510.0% Sales Tax001.000.66.518.30.31.00 5.88PS - SUPPLIES5025922PS - Supplies001.000.66.518.30.31.00 44.6410.0% Sales Tax001.000.66.518.30.31.00 4.46PS - SUPPLIES5092680PS - Supplies16Page:6.3.aPacket Pg. 54Attachment: claim cks 02-15-18 (Approval of claim checks, wire payment and payroll check.)
02/14/2018Voucher ListCity of Edmonds17 2:56:51PMPage:vchlistBank code :usbankVoucherDateVendorInvoicePO #Description/AccountAmount229837 2/15/2018(Continued)067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES001.000.66.518.30.31.00 22.6010.0% Sales Tax001.000.66.518.30.31.00 2.26FAC MAINT UNIT 40 SUPPLIES572155Fac Maint Unit 40 Supplies001.000.66.518.30.31.00 32.4410.0% Sales Tax001.000.66.518.30.31.00 3.24WATER - TOOL BOX6026921Water - Tool Box421.000.74.534.80.31.00 39.9710.0% Sales Tax421.000.74.534.80.31.00 4.00LIBRARY - LED DIMMERS6583770Library - LED Dimmers001.000.66.518.30.31.00 82.7210.0% Sales Tax001.000.66.518.30.31.00 8.26FAC MAINT SHOP - SUPPLIES7026817Fac Maint Shop - Supplies001.000.66.518.30.31.00 126.7810.0% Sales Tax001.000.66.518.30.31.00 12.68SR CENTER - SUPPLIES8013330Sr Center - Supplies001.000.66.518.30.31.00 32.3210.0% Sales Tax001.000.66.518.30.31.00 3.26FAC MAINT SHOP SUPPLIES9013380Fac Maint Shop Supplies001.000.66.518.30.31.00 113.0710.0% Sales Tax001.000.66.518.30.31.00 11.31LIBRARY - SUPPLIES901463017Page:6.3.aPacket Pg. 55Attachment: claim cks 02-15-18 (Approval of claim checks, wire payment and payroll check.)
02/14/2018Voucher ListCity of Edmonds18 2:56:51PMPage:vchlistBank code :usbankVoucherDateVendorInvoicePO #Description/AccountAmount229837 2/15/2018(Continued)067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICESLibrary - Supplies001.000.66.518.30.31.00 3.7710.0% Sales Tax001.000.66.518.30.31.00 0.38FAC MAINT - SUPPLIES9014671Fac Maint - Supplies001.000.66.518.30.31.00 45.3910.0% Sales Tax001.000.66.518.30.31.00 4.53Total :1,539.66229838 2/15/2018073548 INDOFF INCORPORATED 3062731COPY PAPERcopy paper001.000.62.524.10.31.00 191.48DIVIDERS3064006dividers001.000.62.524.10.31.00 38.54NOTEBOOKS3064578notebooks001.000.62.524.10.31.00 32.74PAPER SANITIZING WIPES3065990PAPER SANITIZING WIPES001.000.23.523.30.31.00 52.5710.3% Sales Tax001.000.23.523.30.31.00 5.42CITY CLERKS OFFICE SUPPLIES3066005THERMAL PAPER, TISSUE, WHITE OUT,001.000.25.514.30.31.00 167.7710.3% Sales Tax001.000.25.514.30.31.00 17.28STAPLER COURT3066006STAPLER COURT001.000.23.512.50.31.00 22.3010.3% Sales Tax001.000.23.512.50.31.00 2.3018Page:6.3.aPacket Pg. 56Attachment: claim cks 02-15-18 (Approval of claim checks, wire payment and payroll check.)
02/14/2018Voucher ListCity of Edmonds19 2:56:51PMPage:vchlistBank code :usbankVoucherDateVendorInvoicePO #Description/AccountAmount229838 2/15/2018(Continued)073548 INDOFF INCORPORATEDPHOTO COPY PAPER3066473PHOTO COPY PAPER001.000.23.512.50.31.00 199.9510.3% Sales Tax001.000.23.512.50.31.00 20.59Total :750.94229839 2/15/2018 070250 IRON MOUNTAIN 20152725101-18 OFF SITE DATA STORAGE SERVICESJan-2018 Off site data storage services512.000.31.518.88.41.00 190.61Total :190.61229840 2/15/2018075062 JAMESTOWN NETWORKS 4773FIBER OPTICS INTERNET CONNECTIONFeb-18 Fiber Optics Internet Connection512.000.31.518.87.42.00 500.0010.3% Sales Tax512.000.31.518.87.42.00 51.50Total :551.50229841 2/15/2018076470 JENNINGS, JAMES 18-013E8CB.SERVICES THRU JANUARY 2018E8CB.Services thru January 2018126.000.68.542.30.41.00 400.00Total :400.00229842 2/15/2018066489 KENT D BRUCE CO LLC 3159UNITS 284, 285 - SEAT COVERSUnits 284, 285 - Seat Covers511.000.77.548.68.31.10 1,690.00Freight511.000.77.548.68.31.10 59.7510.3% Sales Tax511.000.77.548.68.31.10 180.22Total :1,929.97229843 2/15/2018073603 LIGHTHOUSE LAW GROUP PLLC Feb-1802-18 LEGALS FEES02-18 Legal fees19Page:6.3.aPacket Pg. 57Attachment: claim cks 02-15-18 (Approval of claim checks, wire payment and payroll check.)
02/14/2018Voucher ListCity of Edmonds20 2:56:51PMPage:vchlistBank code :usbankVoucherDateVendorInvoicePO #Description/AccountAmount229843 2/15/2018(Continued)073603 LIGHTHOUSE LAW GROUP PLLC001.000.36.515.31.41.00 46,119.42Total :46,119.42229844 2/15/2018075480 MADATH, DONNA 6444 ART & PLAY 6444 ART & PLAY INSTRUCTION6444 ART & PLAY INSTRUCTION001.000.64.571.22.41.00 75.00Total :75.00229845 2/15/2018075769 MAILFINANCE INC N6960303POSTAGE MACHINE LEASE 11/23/17 - 02/22/2POSTAGE MACHINE LEASE 11/23/2017 -001.000.25.514.30.45.00 1,542.6010.3% Sales Tax001.000.25.514.30.45.00 158.88LEASE#N16073348 UB FOLDING MACHINEN6967508LEASE#N16073348 UB FOLDING MACHINE421.000.74.534.80.48.00 193.58LEASE#N16073348 UB FOLDING MACHINE423.000.75.535.80.48.00 193.58LEASE#N16073348 UB FOLDING MACHINE422.000.72.531.90.48.00 193.5810.3% Sales Tax421.000.74.534.80.48.00 19.9410.3% Sales Tax423.000.75.535.80.48.00 19.9410.3% Sales Tax422.000.72.531.90.48.00 19.94Total :2,342.04229846 2/15/2018019940 MC COMAS, GARY 15REIMBURSEMENTREIMBURSEMENT009.000.39.517.20.23.00 1,751.43Total :1,751.43229847 2/15/2018019920 MCCANN, MARIAN 18REIMBURSEMENTREIMBURSEMENT20Page:6.3.aPacket Pg. 58Attachment: claim cks 02-15-18 (Approval of claim checks, wire payment and payroll check.)
02/14/2018Voucher ListCity of Edmonds21 2:56:51PMPage:vchlistBank code :usbankVoucherDateVendorInvoicePO #Description/AccountAmount229847 2/15/2018(Continued)019920 MCCANN, MARIAN009.000.39.517.20.29.00 9,001.00REIMBURSEMENT19REIMBURSEMENT009.000.39.517.20.29.00 2,637.50Total :11,638.50229848 2/15/2018 075746 MCMURRAY, LAURA 6399 FELDENKRAIS 6399 FELDENKRAIS INSTRUCTION6399 FELDENKRAIS INSTRUCTION001.000.64.571.27.41.00 234.00Total :234.00229849 2/15/2018066878 METAL SUPERMARKETS 1014668WWTP: ALUMINUM PLATE CUTTING SERVICEALUMINUM PLATE CUTTING SERVICE - picked423.000.76.535.80.48.00 172.539.7% Sales Tax423.000.76.535.80.48.00 16.74Total :189.27229850 2/15/2018020450 MICRO DATA BUSINESS FORMS 42085INV#42085 - EDMONDS PD3,000 PARKING TICKETS001.000.41.521.11.31.00 529.62Freight001.000.41.521.11.31.00 42.3510.3% Sales Tax001.000.41.521.11.31.00 58.91Total :630.88229851 2/15/2018020900 MILLERS EQUIP & RENT ALL INC 275190PM: CHAINSAW, CONCRETEPM: CHAINSAW, CONCRETE001.000.64.576.80.45.00 104.5010.3% Sales Tax001.000.64.576.80.45.00 10.76PM: CHAIN275238PM: CHAIN001.000.64.576.80.31.00 36.0821Page:6.3.aPacket Pg. 59Attachment: claim cks 02-15-18 (Approval of claim checks, wire payment and payroll check.)
02/14/2018Voucher ListCity of Edmonds22 2:56:51PMPage:vchlistBank code :usbankVoucherDateVendorInvoicePO #Description/AccountAmount229851 2/15/2018(Continued)020900 MILLERS EQUIP & RENT ALL INC10.3% Sales Tax001.000.64.576.80.31.00 3.72Total :155.06229852 2/15/2018076264 MONO ROOFTOP SOLUTIONS 24159FAC - ROOF REPAIRSFAC - Roof Repairs001.000.66.518.30.48.00 460.0010.3% Sales Tax001.000.66.518.30.48.00 47.38Total :507.38229853 2/15/2018 076469 MORTON, VISOCHANEA 25176CAMBODIAN INTERPRETER PROBATIONCAMBODIAN INTERPRETER PROBATION001.000.23.523.30.41.01 102.32CAMBODIAN INTERPRETER PROBATION25820CAMBODIAN INTERPRETER PROBATION001.000.23.523.30.41.01 102.32CAMBODIAN INTERPRETER PROBATION26271CAMBODIAN INTERPRETER PROBATION001.000.23.523.30.41.01 102.32Total :306.96229854 2/15/2018067834 NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION RENTALS 4945217PM: TEMPORARY PANELSPM: TEMPORARY PANELS001.000.64.576.80.45.00 28.0810.3% Sales Tax001.000.64.576.80.45.00 2.89Total :30.97229855 2/15/2018064570 NATIONAL SAFETY INC 0494071-INSEWER - PARTSSewer - Parts423.000.75.535.80.31.00 2.1010.3% Sales Tax423.000.75.535.80.31.00 0.22SEWER - SUPPLIES0495442-IN22Page:6.3.aPacket Pg. 60Attachment: claim cks 02-15-18 (Approval of claim checks, wire payment and payroll check.)
02/14/2018Voucher ListCity of Edmonds23 2:56:51PMPage:vchlistBank code :usbankVoucherDateVendorInvoicePO #Description/AccountAmount229855 2/15/2018(Continued)064570 NATIONAL SAFETY INCSewer - Supplies423.000.75.535.80.31.00 140.2510.3% Sales Tax423.000.75.535.80.31.00 14.45Total :157.02229856 2/15/2018075140 NORTHWEST PERMIT BLD201741145 CANCELLED JOB BLD20170587CANCELLED JOB BLD20170587001.000.257.620 80.00Total :80.00229857 2/15/2018 065720 OFFICE DEPOT 102279623001 P&R ACCOUNT 90520437P&R: DUCT TAPE001.000.64.571.21.31.00 8.9910.3% Sales Tax001.000.64.571.21.31.00 0.93P&R ACCOUNT 90520437102279813001P&R: TISSUE, PURELL001.000.64.571.21.31.00 27.2610.3% Sales Tax001.000.64.571.21.31.00 2.81Total :39.99229858 2/15/2018070166 OFFICE OF THE STATE TREASURER January, 2018COURT, BLDG CODE & JIS TRANSMITTALEmergency Medical Services & Trauma001.000.237.120 1,891.31PSEA 1, 2 & 3 Account001.000.237.130 29,053.57Building Code Fee Account001.000.237.150 191.00State Patrol Death Investigation001.000.237.330 39.89Judicial Information Systems Account001.000.237.180 8,756.19School Zone Safety Account23Page:6.3.aPacket Pg. 61Attachment: claim cks 02-15-18 (Approval of claim checks, wire payment and payroll check.)
02/14/2018Voucher ListCity of Edmonds24 2:56:51PMPage:vchlistBank code :usbankVoucherDateVendorInvoicePO #Description/AccountAmount229858 2/15/2018(Continued)070166 OFFICE OF THE STATE TREASURER001.000.237.200 10.92Washington Auto Theft Prevention001.000.237.250 3,774.75Traumatic Brain Injury001.000.237.260 746.96Accessible Communities Acct001.000.237.290 11.11Multi-Model Transportation001.000.237.300 11.11Hwy Safety Acct001.000.237.320 122.48Crime Lab Blood Breath Analysis001.000.237.170 28.00WSP Hwy Acct001.000.237.340 226.73Domestic Violence Prevention001.000.237.370 1.94Total :44,865.96229859 2/15/2018 069338 PARTNER CONSTRUCTION PRODUCT8823ROADWAY - SEALANTRoadway - Sealant111.000.68.542.31.31.00 1,687.50Freight111.000.68.542.31.31.00 75.0010.0% Sales Tax111.000.68.542.31.31.00 176.25Total :1,938.75229860 2/15/2018 074830 PERFORMANCE SYSTEMS INTEG 654296MUSEUM - ANNUAL FIRE ALARM INSPECTIONMuseum - Annual Fire Alarm Inspection001.000.66.518.30.48.00 715.00Total :715.00229861 2/15/2018073871 PERSONNEL EVALUATION INC 26494INV 26494 EDMONDS PD JAN 2018WEB-BASED PEP TEST24Page:6.3.aPacket Pg. 62Attachment: claim cks 02-15-18 (Approval of claim checks, wire payment and payroll check.)
02/14/2018Voucher ListCity of Edmonds25 2:56:51PMPage:vchlistBank code :usbankVoucherDateVendorInvoicePO #Description/AccountAmount229861 2/15/2018(Continued)073871 PERSONNEL EVALUATION INC001.000.41.521.10.41.00 40.00Total :40.00229862 2/15/2018074793 PETDATA INC 6428INV#6428 - EDMONDS PD - JAN 2018320 - 1 YR LICENSES @ $3.90001.000.41.521.70.41.00 1,248.00Total :1,248.00229863 2/15/2018008350 PETTY CASH 2/8 PARKS PETTY CASH 2/8/18 PARKS PETTY CASHCOLLEY: DOLLAR STORES: DISCOVERY001.000.64.571.23.31.00 6.00CHAPIN: AARON BROTHERS: FRAMES117.100.64.573.20.31.00 17.60COLLEY: STORMING THE SOUND: REGISTRATION001.000.64.571.23.49.00 10.00HITE: UBER: TRANSPORTATION WHEN CITY001.000.64.571.21.43.00 26.50CHAPIN: STATE OF WASHINGTON PARKING:117.100.64.573.20.43.00 9.00Total :69.10229864 2/15/2018071783 PIGSKIN UNIFORMS 2018-08INV#2018-08 - EDMONDS PD - COMPTONWINTER WEIGHT JUMPSUIT001.000.41.521.22.24.00 440.00UNDER ARM VENTS001.000.41.521.22.24.00 25.00NAME PATCH001.000.41.521.22.24.00 10.00POLICE - FRONT001.000.41.521.22.24.00 10.00HIDDEN POCKETS001.000.41.521.22.24.00 30.00Freight001.000.41.521.22.24.00 20.00Sales Tax25Page:6.3.aPacket Pg. 63Attachment: claim cks 02-15-18 (Approval of claim checks, wire payment and payroll check.)
02/14/2018Voucher ListCity of Edmonds26 2:56:51PMPage:vchlistBank code :usbankVoucherDateVendorInvoicePO #Description/AccountAmount229864 2/15/2018(Continued)071783 PIGSKIN UNIFORMS001.000.41.521.22.24.00 45.48Total :580.48229865 2/15/2018028860 PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY P591181FS 20 - PARTSFS 20 - Parts001.000.66.518.30.31.00 643.9310.3% Sales Tax001.000.66.518.30.31.00 66.32PS - SUPPLIESP593385PS - Supplies001.000.66.518.30.31.00 182.9110.3% Sales Tax001.000.66.518.30.31.00 18.84TRAFFIC - SUPPLIESP618566Traffic - Supplies111.000.68.542.64.31.00 105.4210.3% Sales Tax111.000.68.542.64.31.00 10.86CITY PARKS BLDG - PARTSP640963City Parks Bldg - Parts001.000.66.518.30.31.00 37.6610.3% Sales Tax001.000.66.518.30.31.00 3.88Total :1,069.82229866 2/15/2018 062807 PLOEGER, KENNETH TRAVEL 01/18EXPENSE CLAIM TRAVEL 01/18 LAS VEGAS - PAIRFARE TO/FM LAS VEGAS001.000.41.521.40.43.00 219.40LYFT TO/FM AIRPORT, TRAINING, HOTEL001.000.41.521.40.43.00 80.11AIRPORT PARKING SEA 1/22-1/26/18001.000.41.521.40.43.00 140.00TRAINING REGISTRATION001.000.41.521.40.49.00 70.004 NIGHTS HOTEL LAS VEGAS26Page:6.3.aPacket Pg. 64Attachment: claim cks 02-15-18 (Approval of claim checks, wire payment and payroll check.)
02/14/2018Voucher ListCity of Edmonds27 2:56:51PMPage:vchlistBank code :usbankVoucherDateVendorInvoicePO #Description/AccountAmount229866 2/15/2018(Continued)062807 PLOEGER, KENNETH001.000.41.521.40.43.00 522.44MEAL PER DIEM 1/22-1/26/18001.000.41.521.40.43.00 242.25Total :1,274.20229867 2/15/2018064167 POLLARD WATER 0100850WATER - VITA-D CHLOR TABLETSWater - VITA-D Chlor Tablets421.000.74.534.80.31.00 595.00Freight421.000.74.534.80.31.00 25.6510.3% Sales Tax421.000.74.534.80.31.00 63.93Total :684.58229868 2/15/2018029117 PORT OF EDMONDS 03870PORT RIGHT-OF-WAY LEASE FOR CITYPORT RIGHT-OF-WAY LEASE FOR CITY422.000.72.531.90.51.00 3,047.76Total :3,047.76229869 2/15/2018070809 PUGET SOUND EXECUTIVE 18-0186COURT SECURITY 01/29/2018-01/31/2018COURT SECURITY 01/29/2018-01/31/2018001.000.23.512.50.41.00 412.50PROBATION DV MRT SECURITY 01/31/2018001.000.23.523.30.41.00 55.00Total :467.50229870 2/15/2018062657 REGIONAL DISPOSAL COMPANY 0000051338STORM - STREET SWEEPINGStorm - Street Sweeping422.000.72.531.10.49.00 2,979.90Total :2,979.90229871 2/15/2018061540 REPUBLIC SERVICES #197 3-0197-0800478FIRE STATION #20 23009 88TH AVE WFIRE STATION #20 23009 88TH AVE W001.000.66.518.30.47.00 156.58PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ST SW3-0197-080089727Page:6.3.aPacket Pg. 65Attachment: claim cks 02-15-18 (Approval of claim checks, wire payment and payroll check.)
02/14/2018Voucher ListCity of Edmonds28 2:56:51PMPage:vchlistBank code :usbankVoucherDateVendorInvoicePO #Description/AccountAmount229871 2/15/2018(Continued)061540 REPUBLIC SERVICES #197PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ST SW001.000.65.518.20.47.00 31.23PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ST SW111.000.68.542.90.47.00 118.68PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ST SW421.000.74.534.80.47.00 118.68PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ST SW423.000.75.535.80.47.10 118.68PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ST SW511.000.77.548.68.47.00 118.68PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ST SW422.000.72.531.90.47.00 118.69FIRE STATION #16 8429 196TH ST SW3-0197-0801132FIRE STATION #16 8429 196TH ST SW001.000.66.518.30.47.00 166.37CLUBHOUSE 6801 N MEADOWDALE RD3-0197-0829729CLUBHOUSE 6801 N MEADOWDALE RD001.000.66.518.30.47.00 71.95Total :1,019.54229872 2/15/2018073567 RF VALVES, INC 10656WWTP: ACTUATORACTUATOR423.000.76.535.80.48.00 2,027.00Freight423.000.76.535.80.48.00 165.86Total :2,192.86229873 2/15/2018 064769 ROMAINE ELECTRIC 5-017016UNIT 13 - BATTERYUnit 13 - Battery511.000.77.548.68.31.10 47.4010.3% Sales Tax511.000.77.548.68.31.10 4.88Total :52.28229874 2/15/2018068489 SIRENNET.COM 0224232-INUNIT E150PO - SPEAKERS28Page:6.3.aPacket Pg. 66Attachment: claim cks 02-15-18 (Approval of claim checks, wire payment and payroll check.)
02/14/2018Voucher ListCity of Edmonds29 2:56:51PMPage:vchlistBank code :usbankVoucherDateVendorInvoicePO #Description/AccountAmount229874 2/15/2018(Continued)068489 SIRENNET.COMUnit E150PO - Speakers511.100.77.594.48.64.00 76.00Freight511.100.77.594.48.64.00 12.2510.3% Sales Tax511.100.77.594.48.64.00 9.09UNIT E149,152,153PO - LINERS0224252-INUnit E149,152,153PO - Liners511.100.77.594.48.64.00 866.6710.3% Sales Tax511.100.77.594.48.64.00 89.26UNITS E151,154,157PO - LINERS0224254-INUnits E151,154,157PO - Liners511.100.77.594.48.64.00 866.6710.3% Sales Tax511.100.77.594.48.64.00 89.26UNIT E150PO - CLEAR LENS0224257-INUnit E150PO - Clear Lens511.100.77.594.48.64.00 158.0010.3% Sales Tax511.100.77.594.48.64.00 16.27UNIT E153WR - LINER0224297-INUnit E153WR - Liner511.100.77.594.48.64.00 288.8910.3% Sales Tax511.100.77.594.48.64.00 29.76UNIT E153WR - LED ARROW BOARD AND STAND0224456-INUnit E153WR - LED Arrow Board and Stand511.100.77.594.48.64.00 1,645.76Freight511.100.77.594.48.64.00 76.5210.3% Sales Tax511.100.77.594.48.64.00 177.40UNIT E150PO - LED FLATLIGHTER, RED0224591-IN29Page:6.3.aPacket Pg. 67Attachment: claim cks 02-15-18 (Approval of claim checks, wire payment and payroll check.)
02/14/2018Voucher ListCity of Edmonds30 2:56:51PMPage:vchlistBank code :usbankVoucherDateVendorInvoicePO #Description/AccountAmount229874 2/15/2018(Continued)068489 SIRENNET.COMUnit E150PO - LED flatlighter, Red511.100.77.594.48.64.00 397.9110.3% Sales Tax511.100.77.594.48.64.00 40.98Total :4,840.69229875 2/15/2018036950 SIX ROBBLEES INC 14-363027UNIT 872 - WIRING HARNESSUnit 872 - Wiring Harness511.000.77.548.68.31.10 54.9710.3% Sales Tax511.000.77.548.68.31.10 5.66Total :60.63229876 2/15/2018036955 SKY NURSERY T-1060836PM: MULCHPM: MULCH001.000.64.576.81.31.00 760.0010.3% Sales Tax001.000.64.576.81.31.00 78.28PM: MULCHT-1060865PM: MULCH001.000.64.576.80.31.00 456.0010.3% Sales Tax001.000.64.576.80.31.00 46.97Total :1,341.25229877 2/15/2018075590 SMARSH INV0032867501-18 NETGUARD MONTHLY SERVICENetGuard Monthly Service Building001.000.62.524.20.42.00 36.00NetGuard Monthly Service City Clerk001.000.25.514.30.42.00 6.00NetGuard Monthly Service Community001.000.61.557.20.42.00 6.00NetGuard Monthly Service Court001.000.23.512.50.42.00 6.00NetGuard Monthly Service Development30Page:6.3.aPacket Pg. 68Attachment: claim cks 02-15-18 (Approval of claim checks, wire payment and payroll check.)
02/14/2018Voucher ListCity of Edmonds31 2:56:51PMPage:vchlistBank code :usbankVoucherDateVendorInvoicePO #Description/AccountAmount229877 2/15/2018(Continued)075590 SMARSH001.000.62.524.10.42.00 6.00NetGuard Monthly Service Engineering001.000.67.518.21.42.00 84.00NetGuard Monthly Service Facilities001.000.66.518.30.42.00 48.00NetGuard Monthly Service Finance001.000.31.514.23.42.00 6.00NetGuard Monthly Service Human Resources001.000.22.518.10.42.00 6.00NetGuard Monthly Service Information512.000.31.518.88.42.00 18.00NetGuard Monthly Service Mayor's Office001.000.21.513.10.42.00 6.00NetGuard Monthly Service Parks001.000.64.571.21.42.00 6.00NetGuard Monthly Service Parks001.000.64.576.80.42.00 12.00NetGuard Monthly Service Police001.000.41.521.22.42.00 246.00NetGuard Monthly Service PW Water421.000.74.534.80.42.00 36.00NetGuard Monthly Service PW Water/Sewer421.000.74.534.80.42.00 3.00NetGuard Monthly Service PW Water/Sewer423.000.75.535.80.42.00 3.00NetGuard Monthly Service PW Sewer423.000.75.535.80.42.00 30.00NetGuard Monthly Service PW Storm422.000.72.531.90.42.00 6.00NetGuard Monthly Service PW Street111.000.68.542.90.42.00 18.00NetGuard Monthly Service PW Fleet511.000.77.548.68.42.00 6.00NetGuard Monthly Service PW Admin31Page:6.3.aPacket Pg. 69Attachment: claim cks 02-15-18 (Approval of claim checks, wire payment and payroll check.)
02/14/2018Voucher ListCity of Edmonds32 2:56:51PMPage:vchlistBank code :usbankVoucherDateVendorInvoicePO #Description/AccountAmount229877 2/15/2018(Continued)075590 SMARSH001.000.65.518.20.42.00 2.10NetGuard Monthly Service PW Admin421.000.74.534.80.42.00 0.60NetGuard Monthly Service PW Admin422.000.72.531.90.42.00 2.10NetGuard Monthly Service PW Admin423.000.75.535.80.42.00 0.60NetGuard Monthly Service PW Admin423.000.76.535.80.42.00 0.60NetGuard Monthly Service PW Street/Storm111.000.68.542.90.42.00 6.00NetGuard Monthly Service PW Street/Storm422.000.72.531.90.42.00 6.00NetGuard Monthly Service WWTP423.000.76.535.80.42.00 72.00Total :684.00229878 2/15/2018037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 2002-0255-4WWTP: 1/4-2/2/18 FLOWMETER 1000541493: 21/4-2/2/18 FLOW METER 2400 HIGHWAY 99423.000.76.535.80.47.62 17.17LIFT STATION #8 113 RAILROAD AVE / METER2002-0291-9LIFT STATION #8 113 RAILROAD AVE /423.000.75.535.80.47.10 211.84CITY PARK RESTROOMS2006-5085-1CITY PARK RESTROOMS001.000.64.576.80.47.00 20.38PARK MAINTENANCE SHOP2006-5164-4PARK MAINTENANCE SHOP001.000.64.576.80.47.00 799.08HICKMAN PARK2011-8453-8HICKMAN PARK001.000.64.576.80.47.00 89.17CITY PARK GAZEBO2013-8327-0CITY PARK GAZEBO001.000.64.576.80.47.00 16.6032Page:6.3.aPacket Pg. 70Attachment: claim cks 02-15-18 (Approval of claim checks, wire payment and payroll check.)
02/14/2018Voucher ListCity of Edmonds33 2:56:51PMPage:vchlistBank code :usbankVoucherDateVendorInvoicePO #Description/AccountAmount229878 2/15/2018(Continued)037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1CIVIC CENTER PLAYFIELD LIGHTS2014-5305-7CIVIC CENTER PLAYFIELD LIGHTS001.000.64.576.80.47.00 61.63ALDERWOOD INTERIE 6130 168TH ST SW / MET2017-9000-3ALDERWOOD INTERIE 6130 168TH ST SW /421.000.74.534.80.47.00 20.78WWTP: 1/4-2/2/18 FLOWMETER 1000488223: 82019-2988-21/4-2/2/18 FLOW METER 8421 244TH ST SW423.000.76.535.80.47.62 17.17CITY PARK S RESTROOMS & SHELTER2021-1448-4CITY PARK S RESTROOMS & SHELTER001.000.64.576.80.47.00 40.98LIFT STATION #5 432 3RD AVE S / METER 102051-8438-5LIFT STATION #5 432 3RD AVE S / METER423.000.75.535.80.47.10 21.53Total :1,316.33229879 2/15/2018006630 SNOHOMISH COUNTY 72024PARKS MAINT 5005 DUMP FEESPARKS MAINT DUMP FEES001.000.64.576.80.47.00 537.00Total :537.00229880 2/15/2018067809 SNOHOMISH COUNTY FINANCE I000464825WWTP: 1/31/18 HAZARDOUS WASTEHazardous Waste423.000.76.535.80.47.66 90.00Total :90.00229881 2/15/2018070167 SNOHOMISH COUNTY TREASURER January 2018 Crime Victims Court RemittanceCrime Victims Court Remittance001.000.237.140 645.20Total :645.20229882 2/15/2018038100 SNO-KING STAMP 63017INV#63017 - EDMONDS PDLOCKER MAGNET - ARVAN001.000.41.521.22.31.00 4.5033Page:6.3.aPacket Pg. 71Attachment: claim cks 02-15-18 (Approval of claim checks, wire payment and payroll check.)
02/14/2018Voucher ListCity of Edmonds34 2:56:51PMPage:vchlistBank code :usbankVoucherDateVendorInvoicePO #Description/AccountAmount229882 2/15/2018(Continued)038100 SNO-KING STAMPMAGMATE PLATES - ARVAN001.000.41.521.22.31.00 6.00MAGMATE PLATES - DOMICO001.000.41.521.11.31.00 6.00Freight001.000.41.521.22.31.00 3.5010.3% Sales Tax001.000.41.521.22.31.00 1.4410.3% Sales Tax001.000.41.521.11.31.00 0.62Total :22.06229883 2/15/2018038300 SOUND DISPOSAL CO 103587PARKS MAINT GARBAGE AND RECYCLINGPARKS MAINT GARBAGE AND RECYCLING001.000.64.576.80.47.00 938.35Total :938.35229884 2/15/2018 038410 SOUND SAFETY PRODUCTS 50531/4WWTP: JMCKENZIE-LYNNWOOD STOJEANNE MCKENZIE - PARTIAL UNIFORM423.000.76.535.80.24.00 107.2110.3% Sales Tax423.000.76.535.80.24.00 11.04Total :118.25229885 2/15/2018027269 THE PART WORKS INC INV22460LIBRARY - PARTSLibrary - Parts001.000.66.518.30.31.00 292.22Freight001.000.66.518.30.31.00 8.0710.3% Sales Tax001.000.66.518.30.31.00 30.93Total :331.22229886 2/15/2018072649 THE WIDE FORMAT COMPANY 105128PLANS COPY PAPERPlans copy paper34Page:6.3.aPacket Pg. 72Attachment: claim cks 02-15-18 (Approval of claim checks, wire payment and payroll check.)
02/14/2018Voucher ListCity of Edmonds35 2:56:51PMPage:vchlistBank code :usbankVoucherDateVendorInvoicePO #Description/AccountAmount229886 2/15/2018(Continued)072649 THE WIDE FORMAT COMPANY001.000.62.524.10.31.00 176.66Total :176.66229887 2/15/2018068724 US HEALTHWORKS MED GROUP OF WA0765640-WA DOT TESTINGSEWER DOT TESTING X3423.000.75.535.80.41.00 297.00STORM DOT TESTING X2422.000.72.531.90.41.00 198.00Total :495.00229888 2/15/2018 047605 WA ST TREASURER 2017EDMONDS FORFEITURES FOR 20174TH QTR/PROCEEDS/DRUG104.000.237.100 4,267.523RD QTR/PROCEEDS/NON DRUG001.000.237.240 180.50Total :4,448.02229889 2/15/2018067086 WASHINGTON CRANE AND HOIST CO 0035269-INWWTP: FOUNDRY HOOKFoundry Hook423.000.76.535.80.48.00 254.33Freight423.000.76.535.80.48.00 27.7710.3% Sales Tax423.000.76.535.80.48.00 29.06Total :311.16229890 2/15/2018065035 WASHINGTON STATE PATROL I18005172INV#I18005172 ID#EDM301-EDMONDS PD-JAN 1BACKGROUND CHECKS - JAN 2018001.000.237.100 252.00Total :252.00229891 2/15/2018067195 WASHINGTON TREE EXPERTS I18-183STREET - 23925 97TH PL W TREE REMOVALStreet - 23925 97th Pl W Tree Removal111.000.68.542.71.48.00 780.0010.3% Sales Tax35Page:6.3.aPacket Pg. 73Attachment: claim cks 02-15-18 (Approval of claim checks, wire payment and payroll check.)
02/14/2018Voucher ListCity of Edmonds36 2:56:51PMPage:vchlistBank code :usbankVoucherDateVendorInvoicePO #Description/AccountAmount229891 2/15/2018(Continued)067195 WASHINGTON TREE EXPERTS111.000.68.542.71.48.00 80.34Total :860.34229892 2/15/2018064800 WEHOP 637006FLOWER PROGRAM: PLANTSFLOWER PROGRAM: PLANTS001.000.64.576.81.31.00 126.8910.3% Sales Tax001.000.64.576.81.31.00 13.07FLOWER PROGRAM: PLANTS637136FLOWER PROGRAM: PLANTS125.000.64.576.80.31.00 451.0010.3% Sales Tax125.000.64.576.80.31.00 46.45Total :637.41229893 2/15/2018 074609 WEST COAST ARMORY NORTH 1172715INV#1172715 CUST ID EDMONDS PD - JAN 201BAY RENTAL 1/4/2018 3.5 HR @$40001.000.41.521.40.41.00 140.00RANGE USAGE - ANDERSON 1/5/18001.000.41.521.40.41.00 13.60RANGE USAGE- GAGNER 1/9/18001.000.41.521.40.41.00 13.60RANGE USAGE - HWANG 1/9/18001.000.41.521.40.41.00 13.60RANGE USAGE - HWANG 1/10/18001.000.41.521.40.41.00 13.60RANGE USAGE - ANDERSON 1/18/18001.000.41.521.40.41.00 13.60RANGE USAGE- GAGNER 1/24/18001.000.41.521.40.41.00 13.60RANGE USAGE - ANDERSON 1/24/18001.000.41.521.40.41.00 13.60RANGE USAGE - ANDERSON 1/27/18001.000.41.521.40.41.00 13.60RANGE USAGE - JAMES 1/27/1836Page:6.3.aPacket Pg. 74Attachment: claim cks 02-15-18 (Approval of claim checks, wire payment and payroll check.)
02/14/2018Voucher ListCity of Edmonds37 2:56:51PMPage:vchlistBank code :usbankVoucherDateVendorInvoicePO #Description/AccountAmount229893 2/15/2018(Continued)074609 WEST COAST ARMORY NORTH001.000.41.521.40.41.00 13.6010.3% Sales Tax001.000.41.521.40.41.00 12.60Total :275.00229894 2/15/2018072627 WEST SAFETY SERVICES INC 7005826MONTHLY 911 DATABASE MAINTMonthly 911 database maint512.000.31.518.88.48.00 100.00Total :100.00229895 2/15/2018 069691 WESTERN SYSTEMS 0000035104TRAFFIC - CABINET RISER FOR OVD & PUGETTraffic - Cabinet Riser for OVD & Puget111.000.68.542.64.31.00 421.6710.3% Sales Tax111.000.68.542.64.31.00 43.43Total :465.10229896 2/15/2018075161 WHISTLE WORKWEAR K13568WWTP: DKORSTAD UNIFORM ALLOW.-SILVERDALEDan Korstad UNIFORM ALLOWANCE PURCHASE423.000.76.535.80.24.00 242.019.0% Sales Tax423.000.76.535.80.24.00 21.78WWTP: DGARCIA UNIFORM ALLOW.-SILVERDALEK13570Dan Garcia UNIFORM ALLOWANCE PURCHASE @423.000.76.535.80.24.00 226.749.0% Sales Tax423.000.76.535.80.24.00 20.41Total :510.94229897 2/15/2018075122 YAKIMA CO DEPT OF CORR JAN 2018INMATE HOUSING - EDMONDS - JAN 2018HOUSE 1 INMATE - 2 DAYS001.000.39.523.60.31.00 119.70Total :119.70Bank total : 427,763.21112 Vouchers for bank code :usbank37Page:6.3.aPacket Pg. 75Attachment: claim cks 02-15-18 (Approval of claim checks, wire payment and payroll check.)
02/14/2018Voucher ListCity of Edmonds38 2:56:51PMPage:vchlistBank code :usbankVoucherDateVendorInvoicePO #Description/AccountAmount427,763.21Total vouchers :Vouchers in this report11238Page:6.3.aPacket Pg. 76Attachment: claim cks 02-15-18 (Approval of claim checks, wire payment and payroll check.)
02/08/2018Voucher ListCity of Edmonds112:35:08PMPage:vchlistBank code :usbankVoucherDateVendorInvoicePO #Description/AccountAmount2062018 2/6/2018076380 BETTER PROPERTIES METRO Feb 2018ACCT #00365662 4TH AVE PARKING LOT RENT4th Avenue Parking Lot Rent - February001.000.39.542.64.45.00 301.00Total :301.00Bank total : 301.001 Vouchers for bank code :usbank301.00Total vouchers :Vouchers in this report11Page:6.3.bPacket Pg. 77Attachment: wire 02-06-18 (Approval of claim checks, wire payment and payroll check.)
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title)
Funding Project Title
Project
Accounting
Number
Engineering
Project
Number
STM 12th Ave & Sierra Stormwater System Improvements c484 E5FE
STR 15th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to 8th Ave)c424 E3DC
STM 183rd Pl SW Storm Repairs c491 E6FE
SWR 2013 Sanitary Sewer Pipe Rehabilitation c390 E2GB
SWR 2013 Sewerline Replacement Project c398 E3GA
STR 2014 Chip Seals c451 E4CB
STM 2014 Drainage Improvements c433 E4FA
STR 2014 Overlay Program c438 E4CA
WTR 2014 Waterline Overlays c452 E4CC
STM 2015 Citywide Drainage Improvements/Rehab Projects c466 E5FA
STR 2015 Overlay Program c463 E5CA
SWR 2015 Sewerline Overlays i007 E5CC
SWR 2015 Sewerline Replacement Project c441 E4GA
STR 2015 Traffic Calming c471 E5AB
WTR 2015 Waterline Overlays c475 E5CB
WTR 2015 Waterline Replacement Program c440 E4JB
STR 2016 Curb Ramp Upgrades i016 E6DC
STR 2016 Overlay Program i008 E6CA
SWR 2016 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Projects c469 E5GA
SWR 2016 Sewerline Overlays i010 E6CC
WTR 2016 Water Comp Plan Update c460 E4JC
WTR 2016 Waterline Overlays i009 E6CB
WTR 2016 Waterline Replacement Projects c468 E5JA
STR 2017 Curb Ramp Upgrades i022 E7DA
STR 2017 Minor Sidewalk Program i023 E7DB
STR 2017 Overlay Program i018 E7CA
SWR 2017 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Project i013 E6GA
SWR 2017 Sewerline Overlays i020 E7CC
STR 2017 Traffic Calming i021 E7AA
WTR 2017 Waterline Overlays i019 E7CB
WTR 2017 Waterline Replacement Projects i014 E6JB
STR 2018 Minor Sidewalk Project i032 E8DA
STR 2018 Overlay Program i030 E8CB
SWR 2018 Sewerline Overlays i035 E8CE
STR 2018 Traffic Calming i027 E8AA
WTR 2018 Waterline Overlays i034 E8CD
WTR 2018 Waterline Replacement Project c493 E6JC
SWR 2018/19 Sewerline Replacement Project c492 E6GC
WTR 2019 Waterline Replacement c498 E7JA
Revised 2/14/2018
6.3.c
Packet Pg. 78 Attachment: FrequentlyUsedProjNumbers 02-15-18 (Approval of claim checks, wire payment and payroll check.)
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title)
Funding Project Title
Project
Accounting
Number
Engineering
Project
Number
STR 220th Adaptive i028 E8AB
STR 220th Street Overlay Project c462 E4CD
STM 224th & 98th Drainage Improvements c486 E6FB
WTR 224th Waterline Relocation (2013)c418 E3JB
STR 228th St. SW Corridor Improvements i005 E7AC
STR 236th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Madrona School)c425 E3DD
STR 238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave)c423 E3DB
STR 238th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Hwy 99)c485 E6DA
STM 3rd Ave Rain Gardens i012 E6FC
STR 76th Ave W & 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements i029 E8CA
STR 76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements c368 E1CA
STR 84th Ave W Overlay from 220th to 212th i031 E8CC
STR 89th Pl W Retaining Wall i025 E7CD
STR 9th Avenue Improvement Project c392 E2AB
FAC A/V Upgrades - Council Chambers c476 E5LA
STR ADA Curb Ramp Upgrades along 3rd Ave S c426 E3DE
STR ADA Curb Ramps i033 E8DB
STR ADA Transition Plan s016 E6DB
STR Audible Pedestrian Signals i024 E7AB
STR Bikelink Project c474 E5DA
PRK City Spray Park c417 E4MA
SWR Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase I c456 E4GB
SWR Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase II c488 E6GB
STR Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements i026 E7DC
STR Citywide Protected/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion i015 E6AB
WTR Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave)c482 E5JB
STM Dayton Street & SR104 Storm Drainage Alternatives c374 E1FM
PM Dayton Street Plaza c276 E7MA
STM Dayton Street Storm Improvements (6th Ave - 8th Ave)c472 E5FC
STM Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station c455 E4FE
FAC Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab c443 E4MB
STM Edmonds Marsh Feasibility Study c380 E2FC
General Edmonds Waterfront Access Analysis c478 E5DB
FAC ESCO III Project c419 E3LB
PRK FAC Band Shell Replacement c477 E6MB
WTR Five Corners Reservoir Re-coating c473 E5KA
STR Five Corners Roundabout (212th Street SW @ 84th Avenue W)c342 E1AA
PM Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor c282 E8MA
STR Hwy 99 Enhancements (Phase III)c405 E2AD
Revised 2/14/2018
6.3.c
Packet Pg. 79 Attachment: FrequentlyUsedProjNumbers 02-15-18 (Approval of claim checks, wire payment and payroll check.)
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title)
Funding Project Title
Project
Accounting
Number
Engineering
Project
Number
STR Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization s014 E6AA
STM Lake Ballinger Associated Projects c436 E4FD
SWR Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study s011 E5GB
STM LID Retrofits Perrinville Creek Basin c434 E4FB
SWR Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study c461 E4GC
STR Minor Sidewalk Program i017 E6DD
STM North Talbot Road Drainage Improvements c378 E2FA
STM Northstream Culvert Repair Under Puget Drive i011 E6FA
STM Northstream Pipe Abandonment on Puget Drive c410 E3FE
STM NPDES (Students Saving Salmon)m013 E7FG
STM OVD Slope Repair & Stabilization m105 E7FA
STM Perrinville Creek Culvert Replacement c376 E1FN
STM Perrinville Creek Stormwater Flow Reduction Retrofit Study c408 E3FC
FAC Public Safety Controls System Upgrades c444 E4LA
STM Seaview Park Infiltration Facility c479 E5FD
WWTP Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring c446 E4HA
STR SR104 Corridor Transportation Study c427 E3AB
STR SR104/City Park Mid-Block Crossing c454 E4DB
UTILITIES Standard Details Updates s010 E5NA
STM Storm Drain Improvements @ 9510 232nd St. SW c495 E7FB
STM Storm Drainage Improvements - 88th & 194th c429 E3FG
STM Stormwater Comp Plan Update s017 E6FD
STR Sunset Walkway Improvements c354 E1DA
STM SW Edmonds Basin #3-238th St. SW to Hickman Park Infiltration System c379 E2FB
STM SW Edmonds-105th/106th Ave W Storm Improvements c430 E3FH
STR Trackside Warning System c470 E5AA
STR Train Trench - Concept c453 E4DA
STR Transportation Plan Update c391 E2AA
STM Update Stormwater Management Code & Associated Projects c467 E5FB
UTILITIES Utility Rate Update s013 E6JA
PRK Veteran's Plaza c480 E6MA
STM Video Assessment of Stormwater Lines c459 E4FF
PRK Waterfront Restoration m103 E7MA
STM Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration c435 E4FC
WWTP WWTP Outfall Pipe Modifications c481 E5HA
PRK Yost Park Spa c494 E6MC
Revised 2/14/2018
6.3.c
Packet Pg. 80 Attachment: FrequentlyUsedProjNumbers 02-15-18 (Approval of claim checks, wire payment and payroll check.)
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Engineering Number)
Funding
Engineering
Project
Number
Project
Accounting
Number Project Title
STR E1AA c342 Five Corners Roundabout (212th Street SW @ 84th Avenue W)
STR E1CA c368 76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements
STR E1DA c354 Sunset Walkway Improvements
STM E1FM c374 Dayton Street & SR104 Storm Drainage Alternatives
STM E1FN c376 Perrinville Creek Culvert Replacement
STR E2AA c391 Transportation Plan Update
STR E2AB c392 9th Avenue Improvement Project
STR E2AD c405 Hwy 99 Enhancements (Phase III)
STM E2FA c378 North Talbot Road Drainage Improvements
STM E2FB c379 SW Edmonds Basin #3-238th St. SW to Hickman Park Infiltration System
STM E2FC c380 Edmonds Marsh Feasibility Study
SWR E2GB c390 2013 Sanitary Sewer Pipe Rehabilitation
STR E3AB c427 SR104 Corridor Transportation Study
STR E3DB c423 238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave)
STR E3DC c424 15th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to 8th Ave)
STR E3DD c425 236th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Madrona School)
STR E3DE c426 ADA Curb Ramp Upgrades along 3rd Ave S
STM E3FC c408 Perrinville Creek Stormwater Flow Reduction Retrofit Study
STM E3FE c410 Northstream Pipe Abandonment on Puget Drive
STM E3FG c429 Storm Drainage Improvements - 88th & 194th
STM E3FH c430 SW Edmonds-105th/106th Ave W Storm Improvements
SWR E3GA c398 2013 Sewerline Replacement Project
WTR E3JB c418 224th Waterline Relocation (2013)
FAC E3LB c419 ESCO III Project
STR E4CA c438 2014 Overlay Program
STR E4CB c451 2014 Chip Seals
WTR E4CC c452 2014 Waterline Overlays
STR E4CD c462 220th Street Overlay Project
STR E4DA c453 Train Trench - Concept
STR E4DB c454 SR104/City Park Mid-Block Crossing
STM E4FA c433 2014 Drainage Improvements
STM E4FB c434 LID Retrofits Perrinville Creek Basin
STM E4FC c435 Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration
STM E4FD c436 Lake Ballinger Associated Projects
STM E4FE c455 Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station
STM E4FF c459 Video Assessment of Stormwater Lines
SWR E4GA c441 2015 Sewerline Replacement Project
SWR E4GB c456 Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase I
SWR E4GC c461 Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study
Revised 2/14/2018
6.3.c
Packet Pg. 81 Attachment: FrequentlyUsedProjNumbers 02-15-18 (Approval of claim checks, wire payment and payroll check.)
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Engineering Number)
Funding
Engineering
Project
Number
Project
Accounting
Number Project Title
WWTP E4HA c446 Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring
WTR E4JB c440 2015 Waterline Replacement Program
WTR E4JC c460 2016 Water Comp Plan Update
FAC E4LA c444 Public Safety Controls System Upgrades
PRK E4MA c417 City Spray Park
FAC E4MB c443 Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab
STR E5AA c470 Trackside Warning System
STR E5AB c471 2015 Traffic Calming
STR E5CA c463 2015 Overlay Program
WTR E5CB c475 2015 Waterline Overlays
SWR E5CC i007 2015 Sewerline Overlays
STR E5DA c474 Bikelink Project
General E5DB c478 Edmonds Waterfront Access Analysis
STM E5FA c466 2015 Citywide Drainage Improvements/Rehab Projects
STM E5FB c467 Update Stormwater Management Code & Associated Projects
STM E5FC c472 Dayton Street Storm Improvements (6th Ave - 8th Ave)
STM E5FD c479 Seaview Park Infiltration Facility
STM E5FE c484 12th Ave & Sierra Stormwater System Improvements
SWR E5GA c469 2016 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Projects
SWR E5GB s011 Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study
WWTP E5HA c481 WWTP Outfall Pipe Modifications
WTR E5JA c468 2016 Waterline Replacement Projects
WTR E5JB c482 Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave)
WTR E5KA c473 Five Corners Reservoir Re-coating
FAC E5LA c476 A/V Upgrades - Council Chambers
UTILITIES E5NA s010 Standard Details Updates
STR E6AA s014 Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization
STR E6AB i015 Citywide Protected/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion
STR E6CA i008 2016 Overlay Program
WTR E6CB i009 2016 Waterline Overlays
SWR E6CC i010 2016 Sewerline Overlays
STR E6DA c485 238th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Hwy 99)
STR E6DB s016 ADA Transition Plan
STR E6DC i016 2016 Curb Ramp Upgrades
STR E6DD i017 Minor Sidewalk Program
STM E6FA i011 Northstream Culvert Repair Under Puget Drive
STM E6FB c486 224th & 98th Drainage Improvements
STM E6FC i012 3rd Ave Rain Gardens
STM E6FD s017 Stormwater Comp Plan Update
Revised 2/14/2018
6.3.c
Packet Pg. 82 Attachment: FrequentlyUsedProjNumbers 02-15-18 (Approval of claim checks, wire payment and payroll check.)
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Engineering Number)
Funding
Engineering
Project
Number
Project
Accounting
Number Project Title
STM E6FE c491 183rd Pl SW Storm Repairs
SWR E6GA i013 2017 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Project
SWR E6GB c488 Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase II
SWR E6GC c492 2018/19 Sewerline Replacement Project
UTILITIES E6JA s013 Utility Rate Update
WTR E6JB i014 2017 Waterline Replacement Projects
WTR E6JC c493 2018 Waterline Replacement Project
PRK E6MA c480 Veteran's Plaza
PRK E6MB c477 FAC Band Shell Replacement
PRK E6MC c494 Yost Park Spa
STR E7AA i021 2017 Traffic Calming
STR E7AB i024 Audible Pedestrian Signals
STR E7AC i005 228th St. SW Corridor Improvements
STR E7CA i018 2017 Overlay Program
WTR E7CB i019 2017 Waterline Overlays
SWR E7CC i020 2017 Sewerline Overlays
STR E7CD i025 89th Pl W Retaining Wall
STR E7DA i022 2017 Curb Ramp Upgrades
STR E7DB i023 2017 Minor Sidewalk Program
STR E7DC i026 Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements
STM E7FA m105 OVD Slope Repair & Stabilization
STM E7FB c495 Storm Drain Improvements @ 9510 232nd St. SW
STM E7FG m013 NPDES (Students Saving Salmon)
WTR E7JA c498 2019 Waterline Replacement
PM E7MA c276 Dayton Street Plaza
PRK E7MA m103 Waterfront Restoration
STR E8AA i027 2018 Traffic Calming
STR E8AB i028 220th Adaptive
STR E8CA i029 76th Ave W & 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements
STR E8CB i030 2018 Overlay Program
STR E8CC i031 84th Ave W Overlay from 220th to 212th
WTR E8CD i034 2018 Waterline Overlays
SWR E8CE i035 2018 Sewerline Overlays
STR E8DA i032 2018 Minor Sidewalk Project
STR E8DB i033 ADA Curb Ramps
PM E8MA c282 Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor
Revised 2/14/2018
6.3.c
Packet Pg. 83 Attachment: FrequentlyUsedProjNumbers 02-15-18 (Approval of claim checks, wire payment and payroll check.)
PROJECT NUMBERS (By New Project Accounting Number)
Funding
Engineering
Project
Number
Project
Accounting
Number Project Title
PM E7MA c276 Dayton Street Plaza
PM E8MA c282 Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor
STR E1AA c342 Five Corners Roundabout (212th Street SW @ 84th Avenue W)
STR E1DA c354 Sunset Walkway Improvements
STR E1CA c368 76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements
STM E1FM c374 Dayton Street & SR104 Storm Drainage Alternatives
STM E1FN c376 Perrinville Creek Culvert Replacement
STM E2FA c378 North Talbot Road Drainage Improvements
STM E2FB c379 SW Edmonds Basin #3-238th St. SW to Hickman Park Infiltration System
STM E2FC c380 Edmonds Marsh Feasibility Study
SWR E2GB c390 2013 Sanitary Sewer Pipe Rehabilitation
STR E2AA c391 Transportation Plan Update
STR E2AB c392 9th Avenue Improvement Project
SWR E3GA c398 2013 Sewerline Replacement Project
STR E2AD c405 Hwy 99 Enhancements (Phase III)
STM E3FC c408 Perrinville Creek Stormwater Flow Reduction Retrofit Study
STM E3FE c410 Northstream Pipe Abandonment on Puget Drive
PRK E4MA c417 City Spray Park
WTR E3JB c418 224th Waterline Relocation (2013)
FAC E3LB c419 ESCO III Project
STR E3DB c423 238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave)
STR E3DC c424 15th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to 8th Ave)
STR E3DD c425 236th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Madrona School)
STR E3DE c426 ADA Curb Ramp Upgrades along 3rd Ave S
STR E3AB c427 SR104 Corridor Transportation Study
STM E3FG c429 Storm Drainage Improvements - 88th & 194th
STM E3FH c430 SW Edmonds-105th/106th Ave W Storm Improvements
STM E4FA c433 2014 Drainage Improvements
STM E4FB c434 LID Retrofits Perrinville Creek Basin
STM E4FC c435 Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration
STM E4FD c436 Lake Ballinger Associated Projects
STR E4CA c438 2014 Overlay Program
WTR E4JB c440 2015 Waterline Replacement Program
SWR E4GA c441 2015 Sewerline Replacement Project
FAC E4MB c443 Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab
FAC E4LA c444 Public Safety Controls System Upgrades
WWTP E4HA c446 Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring
STR E4CB c451 2014 Chip Seals
WTR E4CC c452 2014 Waterline Overlays
Revised 2/14/2018
6.3.c
Packet Pg. 84 Attachment: FrequentlyUsedProjNumbers 02-15-18 (Approval of claim checks, wire payment and payroll check.)
PROJECT NUMBERS (By New Project Accounting Number)
Funding
Engineering
Project
Number
Project
Accounting
Number Project Title
STR E4DA c453 Train Trench - Concept
STR E4DB c454 SR104/City Park Mid-Block Crossing
STM E4FE c455 Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station
SWR E4GB c456 Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase I
STM E4FF c459 Video Assessment of Stormwater Lines
WTR E4JC c460 2016 Water Comp Plan Update
SWR E4GC c461 Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study
STR E4CD c462 220th Street Overlay Project
STR E5CA c463 2015 Overlay Program
STM E5FA c466 2015 Citywide Drainage Improvements/Rehab Projects
STM E5FB c467 Update Stormwater Management Code & Associated Projects
WTR E5JA c468 2016 Waterline Replacement Projects
SWR E5GA c469 2016 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Projects
STR E5AA c470 Trackside Warning System
STR E5AB c471 2015 Traffic Calming
STM E5FC c472 Dayton Street Storm Improvements (6th Ave - 8th Ave)
WTR E5KA c473 Five Corners Reservoir Re-coating
STR E5DA c474 Bikelink Project
WTR E5CB c475 2015 Waterline Overlays
FAC E5LA c476 A/V Upgrades - Council Chambers
PRK E6MB c477 FAC Band Shell Replacement
General E5DB c478 Edmonds Waterfront Access Analysis
STM E5FD c479 Seaview Park Infiltration Facility
PRK E6MA c480 Veteran's Plaza
WWTP E5HA c481 WWTP Outfall Pipe Modifications
WTR E5JB c482 Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave)
STM E5FE c484 12th Ave & Sierra Stormwater System Improvements
STR E6DA c485 238th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Hwy 99)
STM E6FB c486 224th & 98th Drainage Improvements
SWR E6GB c488 Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase II
STM E6FE c491 183rd Pl SW Storm Repairs
SWR E6GC c492 2018/19 Sewerline Replacement Project
WTR E6JC c493 2018 Waterline Replacement Project
PRK E6MC c494 Yost Park Spa
STM E7FB c495 Storm Drain Improvements @ 9510 232nd St. SW
WTR E7JA c498 2019 Waterline Replacement
STR E7AC i005 228th St. SW Corridor Improvements
SWR E5CC i007 2015 Sewerline Overlays
STR E6CA i008 2016 Overlay Program
Revised 2/14/2018
6.3.c
Packet Pg. 85 Attachment: FrequentlyUsedProjNumbers 02-15-18 (Approval of claim checks, wire payment and payroll check.)
PROJECT NUMBERS (By New Project Accounting Number)
Funding
Engineering
Project
Number
Project
Accounting
Number Project Title
WTR E6CB i009 2016 Waterline Overlays
SWR E6CC i010 2016 Sewerline Overlays
STM E6FA i011 Northstream Culvert Repair Under Puget Drive
STM E6FC i012 3rd Ave Rain Gardens
SWR E6GA i013 2017 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Project
WTR E6JB i014 2017 Waterline Replacement Projects
STR E6AB i015 Citywide Protected/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion
STR E6DC i016 2016 Curb Ramp Upgrades
STR E6DD i017 Minor Sidewalk Program
STR E7CA i018 2017 Overlay Program
WTR E7CB i019 2017 Waterline Overlays
SWR E7CC i020 2017 Sewerline Overlays
STR E7AA i021 2017 Traffic Calming
STR E7DA i022 2017 Curb Ramp Upgrades
STR E7DB i023 2017 Minor Sidewalk Program
STR E7AB i024 Audible Pedestrian Signals
STR E7CD i025 89th Pl W Retaining Wall
STR E7DC i026 Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements
STR E8AA i027 2018 Traffic Calming
STR E8AB i028 220th Adaptive
STR E8CA i029 76th Ave W & 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements
STR E8CB i030 2018 Overlay Program
STR E8CC i031 84th Ave W Overlay from 220th to 212th
STR E8DA i032 2018 Minor Sidewalk Project
STR E8DB i033 ADA Curb Ramps
WTR E8CD i034 2018 Waterline Overlays
SWR E8CE i035 2018 Sewerline Overlays
STM E7FG m013 NPDES (Students Saving Salmon)
PRK E7MA m103 Waterfront Restoration
STM E7FA m105 OVD Slope Repair & Stabilization
UTILITIES E5NA s010 Standard Details Updates
SWR E5GB s011 Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study
UTILITIES E6JA s013 Utility Rate Update
STR E6AA s014 Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization
STR E6DB s016 ADA Transition Plan
STM E6FD s017 Stormwater Comp Plan Update
Revised 2/14/2018
6.3.c
Packet Pg. 86 Attachment: FrequentlyUsedProjNumbers 02-15-18 (Approval of claim checks, wire payment and payroll check.)
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Funding)
Funding Project Title
Project
Accounting
Number
Engineering
Project
Number
FAC A/V Upgrades - Council Chambers c476 E5LA
FAC Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab c443 E4MB
FAC ESCO III Project c419 E3LB
FAC Public Safety Controls System Upgrades c444 E4LA
General Edmonds Waterfront Access Analysis c478 E5DB
PM Dayton Street Plaza c276 E7MA
PM Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor c282 E8MA
PRK City Spray Park c417 E4MA
PRK FAC Band Shell Replacement c477 E6MB
PRK Veteran's Plaza c480 E6MA
PRK Waterfront Restoration m103 E7MA
PRK Yost Park Spa c494 E6MC
STM 12th Ave & Sierra Stormwater System Improvements c484 E5FE
STM 183rd Pl SW Storm Repairs c491 E6FE
STM 2014 Drainage Improvements c433 E4FA
STM 2015 Citywide Drainage Improvements/Rehab Projects c466 E5FA
STM 224th & 98th Drainage Improvements c486 E6FB
STM 3rd Ave Rain Gardens i012 E6FC
STM Dayton Street & SR104 Storm Drainage Alternatives c374 E1FM
STM Dayton Street Storm Improvements (6th Ave - 8th Ave)c472 E5FC
STM Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station c455 E4FE
STM Edmonds Marsh Feasibility Study c380 E2FC
STM Lake Ballinger Associated Projects c436 E4FD
STM LID Retrofits Perrinville Creek Basin c434 E4FB
STM North Talbot Road Drainage Improvements c378 E2FA
STM Northstream Culvert Repair Under Puget Drive i011 E6FA
STM Northstream Pipe Abandonment on Puget Drive c410 E3FE
STM NPDES (Students Saving Salmon)m013 E7FG
STM OVD Slope Repair & Stabilization m105 E7FA
STM Perrinville Creek Culvert Replacement c376 E1FN
STM Perrinville Creek Stormwater Flow Reduction Retrofit Study c408 E3FC
STM Seaview Park Infiltration Facility c479 E5FD
STM Storm Drain Improvements @ 9510 232nd St. SW c495 E7FB
STM Storm Drainage Improvements - 88th & 194th c429 E3FG
STM Stormwater Comp Plan Update s017 E6FD
STM SW Edmonds Basin #3-238th St. SW to Hickman Park Infiltration System c379 E2FB
STM SW Edmonds-105th/106th Ave W Storm Improvements c430 E3FH
STM Update Stormwater Management Code & Associated Projects c467 E5FB
Revised 2/14/2018
6.3.c
Packet Pg. 87 Attachment: FrequentlyUsedProjNumbers 02-15-18 (Approval of claim checks, wire payment and payroll check.)
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Funding)
Funding Project Title
Project
Accounting
Number
Engineering
Project
Number
STM Video Assessment of Stormwater Lines c459 E4FF
STM Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration c435 E4FC
STR 15th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to 8th Ave)c424 E3DC
STR 2014 Chip Seals c451 E4CB
STR 2014 Overlay Program c438 E4CA
STR 2015 Overlay Program c463 E5CA
STR 2015 Traffic Calming c471 E5AB
STR 2016 Curb Ramp Upgrades i016 E6DC
STR 2016 Overlay Program i008 E6CA
STR 2017 Curb Ramp Upgrades i022 E7DA
STR 2017 Minor Sidewalk Program i023 E7DB
STR 2017 Overlay Program i018 E7CA
STR 2017 Traffic Calming i021 E7AA
STR 2018 Minor Sidewalk Project i032 E8DA
STR 2018 Overlay Program i030 E8CB
STR 2018 Traffic Calming i027 E8AA
STR 220th Street Overlay Project c462 E4CD
STR 228th St. SW Corridor Improvements i005 E7AC
STR 236th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Madrona School)c425 E3DD
STR 238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave)c423 E3DB
STR 238th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Hwy 99)c485 E6DA
STR 76th Ave W & 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements i029 E8CA
STR 76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements c368 E1CA
STR 84th Ave W Overlay from 220th to 212th i031 E8CC
STR 89th Pl W Retaining Wall i025 E7CD
STR 9th Avenue Improvement Project c392 E2AB
STR ADA Curb Ramp Upgrades along 3rd Ave S c426 E3DE
STR ADA Curb Ramps i033 E8DB
STR ADA Transition Plan s016 E6DB
STR Audible Pedestrian Signals i024 E7AB
STR Bikelink Project c474 E5DA
STR Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements i026 E7DC
STR Citywide Protected/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion i015 E6AB
STR Five Corners Roundabout (212th Street SW @ 84th Avenue W)c342 E1AA
STR Hwy 99 Enhancements (Phase III)c405 E2AD
STR Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization s014 E6AA
STR Minor Sidewalk Program i017 E6DD
STR SR104 Corridor Transportation Study c427 E3AB
STR SR104/City Park Mid-Block Crossing c454 E4DB
Revised 2/14/2018
6.3.c
Packet Pg. 88 Attachment: FrequentlyUsedProjNumbers 02-15-18 (Approval of claim checks, wire payment and payroll check.)
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Funding)
Funding Project Title
Project
Accounting
Number
Engineering
Project
Number
STR Sunset Walkway Improvements c354 E1DA
STR Trackside Warning System c470 E5AA
STR Train Trench - Concept c453 E4DA
STR Transportation Plan Update c391 E2AA
STR 220th Adaptive i028 E8AB
SWR 2013 Sanitary Sewer Pipe Rehabilitation c390 E2GB
SWR 2013 Sewerline Replacement Project c398 E3GA
SWR 2015 Sewerline Overlays i007 E5CC
SWR 2015 Sewerline Replacement Project c441 E4GA
SWR 2016 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Projects c469 E5GA
SWR 2016 Sewerline Overlays i010 E6CC
SWR 2017 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Project i013 E6GA
SWR 2017 Sewerline Overlays i020 E7CC
SWR 2018 Sewerline Overlays i035 E8CE
SWR 2018/19 Sewerline Replacement Project c492 E6GC
SWR Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase I c456 E4GB
SWR Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase II c488 E6GB
SWR Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study s011 E5GB
SWR Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study c461 E4GC
UTILITIES Standard Details Updates s010 E5NA
UTILITIES Utility Rate Update s013 E6JA
WTR 2014 Waterline Overlays c452 E4CC
WTR 2015 Waterline Overlays c475 E5CB
WTR 2015 Waterline Replacement Program c440 E4JB
WTR 2016 Water Comp Plan Update c460 E4JC
WTR 2016 Waterline Overlays i009 E6CB
WTR 2016 Waterline Replacement Projects c468 E5JA
WTR 2017 Waterline Overlays i019 E7CB
WTR 2017 Waterline Replacement Projects i014 E6JB
WTR 2018 Waterline Overlays i034 E8CD
WTR 2018 Waterline Replacement Project c493 E6JC
WTR 2019 Waterline Replacement c498 E7JA
WTR 224th Waterline Relocation (2013)c418 E3JB
WTR Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave)c482 E5JB
WTR Five Corners Reservoir Re-coating c473 E5KA
WWTP Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring c446 E4HA
WWTP WWTP Outfall Pipe Modifications c481 E5HA
Revised 2/14/2018
6.3.c
Packet Pg. 89 Attachment: FrequentlyUsedProjNumbers 02-15-18 (Approval of claim checks, wire payment and payroll check.)
Payroll Earnings Summary ReportCity of EdmondsPay Period: 906 (02/13/2018 to 02/13/2018)Hours AmountHour Type Hour Class DescriptionCLOTHING ALLOWANCEMISCELLANEOUS9030.00 375.00Total Net Pay: $343.15$375.000.0002/14/2018Page 1 of 16.3.dPacket Pg. 90Attachment: payroll summary 02-13-18 (Approval of claim checks, wire payment and payroll check.)
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 02/20/2018
Preliminary 2017 December Quarterly Financial Report
Staff Lead: Dave Turley
Department: Administrative Services
Preparer: Sarah Mager
Background/History
N/A
Staff Recommendation
No action needed; informational only.
Narrative
Preliminary 2017 December Quarterly Financial Report
Attachments:
Complete Preliminary December 2017 Financial Report
6.4
Packet Pg. 91
Preliminary Financial Management Report as of December 31, 2017
CITY OF MUKILTEO
Revenue Highlights:
Overall preliminary General Fund
revenues are ahead of budget by
$1.7M, and 2017 ongoing
revenues are ahead of 2016 by
$923K.
2017 tax revenues are $271K
higher than 2016, and $664K
higher than budget forecast. This
increase is led by sales taxes,
which are up $489,992.
Breakdown of General Fund Reve-nues:
General Fund revenues for 2017 are
higher than 2016 in the categories of
Taxes, Licenses and Permits, and
Charges for Goods and Services.
General Fund revenues are falling
behind 2016’s pace in Intergovern-
mental revenues (primarily grant rev-
enues) and in Fines and Forfeitures.
Revenue from Parking Infractions is up
by $28,952 over last year, or 68%.
More detail for General Fund revenues
can be found beginning on page 3.
Special Revenue Funds revenues are
$2,657,792 or 19% lower than last
year. This decrease is primarily due to a
$1.6 million drop in revenues in the
Parks Construction Fund, largely due to
smaller grant billings, and a $714,495
decrease in the Street Construction
Fund. Revenues are still being recorded
in this fund, however, as year-end
transfers and revenue accruals are being
made. The decrease in revenue in the
special revenue funds was offset some-
what by a $196,798 increase in REET
revenues, as well as a $80,085 increase
Summary of All Operating Funds: Revenue
INSIDE THIS
Revenues By Fund Summary 1
Expenditures By Fund
Summary
2
General Fund
Revenues
3
Expenditures By Fund
Details
6
General Fund
Expenditure Detail
13
Investment Portfolio 32
Fund Balance
Overview
34
Below: City Hall invaded by a local
biker gang during the Halloween Cos-
tume Contest!
Financial Management Report
As of December 31, 2017 AT A GLANCE:
The unemployment rate for
Seattle/Bellevue/Everett was at
3.7% in December. Home sales continue at a high rate. Accord-ing to NWMLS, we are at 1.2 months of home supply in Snohomish County — industry experts consider a 4 to 6 months supply to be a “Balanced Mar-
ket.”
The Financial Management Report is a summary of the City’s preliminary
2017 financial results with a comparison to 2016.
6.4.a
Packet Pg. 92 Attachment: Complete Preliminary December 2017 Financial Report (Preliminary 2017 December Quarterly Financial Report)
Preliminary Financial Management Report as of December 31, 2017
Above: Now you
See It, Now You
Don’t! The begin-
nings of the devel-
opment of Civic
Field are evident as the bleachers, built
in 1937, come down.
Below: One of the
highlights of Fall in Edmonds is the
annual Scarecrow Festival, now in its
fifth year.
Summary of All Operating Funds: Expenditures
Preliminary General Fund ex-
penditures ended the year with
97% of the budget expended, sim-
ilar to last year’s 96% pace at
year end.
General Fund expense by catego-
ries are on page 6 and depart-
mental expenses are on pages 13-
16.
More General Fund expenditure
information in graphical form can
be found on pages 23-31.
Special Revenue Fund expendi-
tures increased $84,294 during
2017 compared to 2016. The ma-
jority of this increase comes
from a $1,944,457 increase
in expenditures
for the Combined
Street Construc-
tion Fund and a
$1,250,315 in-
crease in REET 2
spending. These
increases were
offset somewhat
by a $1,726,757
decrease in the
Parks Construc-
tion Fund. Addi-
tional Special
Revenue Fund expenditure infor-
mation can be found on pages 6-8.
Through December 31 the Enterprise
Funds (the Water fund, Storm fund, and
Sewer fund) expenses increased by
$1.7 million over last year, primarily
due to increased capital expenses in the
sewer fund. Additional Utility Fund
expense information can be found on
pages 9-10.
Other Highlights during the Quarter
The Finance Department produced the
City’s first ever Popular Annual
Financial Report (PAFR) in 2017.
The Department was notified by the
GFOA that the City had been awarded
the Certificate of Achievement in Fi-
nancial Reporting for both the 2016
Comprehensive Annual
Financial Report
(CAFR) and for the 2016
PAFR. To be awarded
these Certificates, the
reports must satisfy
Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles
and applicable legal
requirements, as well as
be easily readable and
efficiently organized.
6.4.a
Packet Pg. 93 Attachment: Complete Preliminary December 2017 Financial Report (Preliminary 2017 December Quarterly Financial Report)
CITY OF EDMONDS
QUARTERLY BUDGETARY FINANCIAL REPORT
DECEMBER 2017
6.4.a
Packet Pg. 94 Attachment: Complete Preliminary December 2017 Financial Report (Preliminary 2017 December Quarterly Financial Report)
1
Page 1 of 1
Fund
No.Title
2017 Amended
Budget
12/31/2016
Revenues
12/31/2017
Revenues
Amount
Remaining % Received
001 GENERAL FUND 37,886,876$ 40,123,476$ 39,552,609$ (1,665,733)$ 104%
009 LEOFF-MEDICAL INS. RESERVE 278,630 279,902 283,858 (5,228) 102%
011 RISK MANAGEMENT FUND 6,800 9,987 17,523 (10,723) 258%
012 CONTINGENCY RESERVE FUND 44,650 712,465 81,422 (36,772) 182%
013 MULTIMODAL TRANSPORTATION FUND - 373 - - 0%
014 HISTORIC PRESERVATION GIFT FUND 5,030 5,057 5,151 (121) 102%
016 BUILDING MAINTENANCE 1 552,000 1,990,652 399,329 152,671 72%
104 DRUG ENFORCEMENT FUND 130,000 85,052 45,221 84,779 35%
111 STREET FUND 1,851,750 1,978,481 2,058,566 (206,816) 111%
112 COMBINED STREET CONST/IMPROVE 2 7,386,277 5,531,211 4,816,716 2,569,561 65%
117 MUNICIPAL ARTS ACQUIS. FUND 140,200 95,801 96,787 43,413 69%
118 MEMORIAL STREET TREE 110 182 351 (241) 319%
120 HOTEL/MOTEL TAX REVENUE FUND 91,200 88,491 90,605 595 99%
121 EMPLOYEE PARKING PERMIT FUND 24,600 26,039 32,705 (8,105) 133%
122 YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP FUND 1,800 1,048 1,877 (77) 104%
123 TOURISM PROMOTIONAL FUND/ARTS 30,450 29,871 31,199 (749) 102%
125 REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 2 1,311,900 1,316,519 1,537,990 (226,090) 117%
126 REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 1, PARKS ACQ FUND 1,314,400 1,566,483 1,541,810 (227,410) 117%
127 GIFTS CATALOG FUND 50,390 36,995 30,603 19,787 61%
129 SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND 1,220 389 753 467 62%
130 CEMETERY MAINTENANCE/IMPROVEMT 177,820 174,486 202,585 (24,765) 114%
132 PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND 3 2,656,940 2,316,868 684,746 1,972,194 26%
136 PARKS TRUST FUND 1,070 1,544 2,985 (1,915) 279%
137 CEMETERY MAINTENANCE TRUST FD 22,880 24,034 35,589 (12,709) 156%
138 SISTER CITY COMMISSION 10,010 8,300 7,245 2,765 72%
139 TRANSPORTATION BENEFIT DISTRICT - 601,316 - - 0%
140 BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT - 77,253 84,238 (84,238) 0%
211 L.I.D. FUND CONTROL 14,400 18,208 - 14,400 0%
231 2012 LT GO DEBT SERVICE FUND 695,830 676,867 695,321 509 100%
232 2014 DEBT SERVICE FUND - 936,429 - - 0%
411 COMBINED UTILITY OPERATION - - (578) 578 0%
421 WATER UTILITY FUND 8,469,570 8,768,603 9,032,264 (562,694) 107%
422 STORM UTILITY FUND 4,789,173 4,009,114 4,197,401 591,772 88%
423 SEWER/WWTP UTILITY FUND 4 12,712,567 11,468,352 13,601,495 (888,928) 107%
424 BOND RESERVE FUND 1,988,720 1,989,892 1,988,690 30 100%
511 EQUIPMENT RENTAL FUND 1,628,910 1,724,500 1,838,585 (209,675) 113%
512 TECHNOLOGY RENTAL FUND 956,490 - 960,768 (4,278) 100%
617 FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND 66,000 66,300 69,425 (3,425) 105%
85,298,663$ 86,740,539$ 84,025,832$ 1,272,831$ 99%
1 Difference between 2016 and 2017 is due to grant invoicing for Fishing Pier Rehab & Mid-Year Transfer difference from 001.
CITY OF EDMONDS
REVENUES BY FUND - SUMMARY
4 Difference between 2016 and 2017 is primarily due to increase in WWTP billings to Partners and the City's share.
3 Differences between 2016 and 2017 are due to SnoCo Grant, parks donations, and park impact fees.
2 Difference between 2016 and 2017 is due to grant invoicing for various projects.
6.4.a
Packet Pg. 95 Attachment: Complete Preliminary December 2017 Financial Report (Preliminary 2017 December Quarterly Financial Report)
2
Page 1 of 1
Fund
No.Title
2017 Amended
Budget
12/31/2016
Expenditures
12/31/2017
Expenditures
Amount
Remaining % Spent
001 GENERAL FUND 40,596,240$ 40,257,530$ 39,216,873$ 1,379,367$ 97%
009 LEOFF-MEDICAL INS. RESERVE 450,067 255,291 410,725 39,342 91%
011 RISK MANAGEMENT RESERVE FUND 100,000 - 81,277 18,723 81%
013 MULTIMODAL TRANSPORTATION FUND - 56,860 - - 0%
014 HISTORIC PRESERVATION GIFT FUND 5,400 - 5,437 (37) 101%
016 BUILDING MAINTENANCE 5 620,500 2,213,511 340,162 280,338 55%
104 DRUG ENFORCEMENT FUND 76,030 62,292 49,458 26,572 65%
111 STREET FUND 2,002,810 1,758,339 1,741,508 261,302 87%
112 COMBINED STREET CONST/IMPROVE 6 7,265,677 3,104,251 5,048,708 2,216,969 69%
117 MUNICIPAL ARTS ACQUIS. FUND 181,880 69,244 58,643 123,237 32%
120 HOTEL/MOTEL TAX REVENUE FUND 104,100 147,691 102,546 1,554 99%
121 EMPLOYEE PARKING PERMIT FUND 26,880 26,816 26,728 152 99%
122 YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP FUND 2,000 1,585 1,375 625 69%
123 TOURISM PROMOTIONAL FUND/ARTS 61,700 29,996 55,461 6,239 90%
125 REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 2 3,106,566 668,915 1,919,230 1,187,336 62%
126 REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 1, PARKS ACQ FUND 2,650,058 1,810,814 1,064,996 1,585,062 40%
127 GIFTS CATALOG FUND 51,220 - 39,535 11,685 77%
129 SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND 40,000 38,434 27,938 12,062 70%
130 CEMETERY MAINTENANCE/IMPROVEMT 234,520 164,289 160,090 74,430 68%
132 PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND 7 2,719,363 2,029,137 302,380 2,416,983 11%
138 SISTER CITY COMMISSION 10,500 5,669 6,023 4,477 57%
139 TRANSPORTATION BENEFIT DISTRICT - 601,316 - - 0%
140 BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT - 93,858 92,321 (92,321) 0%
211 L.I.D. FUND CONTROL 16,450 7,600 16,450 - 100%
213 L.I.D. GUARANTY FUND - 105,135 - - 0%
231 2012 LT GO DEBT SERVICE FUND 695,830 676,867 695,321 509 100%
232 2014 DEBT SERVICE FUND - 936,429 - - 0%
421 WATER UTILITY FUND 13,173,652 9,006,049 10,429,355 2,744,297 79%
422 STORM UTILITY FUND 8,296,711 5,041,811 4,134,213 4,162,498 50%
423 SEWER/WWTP UTILITY FUND 17,449,376 14,214,206 15,411,465 2,037,911 88%
424 BOND RESERVE FUND 1,989,720 1,989,884 1,988,684 1,036 100%
511 EQUIPMENT RENTAL FUND 2,034,173 1,576,102 1,807,239 226,934 89%
512 TECHNOLOGY RENTAL FUND 925,130 - 714,607 210,523 77%
617 FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND 72,070 44,705 67,641 4,429 94%
104,958,623$ 86,994,625$ 86,016,387$ 18,942,236$ 82%
7 Differences between 2016 and 2017 are due to purchase of Civic Field in 2016.
6 Differences between 2016 and 2017 are due to construction projects in 2017, primarily the 76th & 212th Intersection Project.
CITY OF EDMONDS
EXPENDITURES BY FUND - SUMMARY
5 Differences between 2016 and 2017 are primarily due to Fishing Pier Rehabilitation Project.
6.4.a
Packet Pg. 96 Attachment: Complete Preliminary December 2017 Financial Report (Preliminary 2017 December Quarterly Financial Report)
3
Page 1 of 3
Title
2017 Amended
Budget
12/31/2016
Revenues
12/31/2017
Revenues
Amount
Remaining % Received
TAXES:
REAL PERSONAL / PROPERTY TAX 8 10,221,670$ 10,010,270$ 10,213,223$ 8,448$ 100%
EMS PROPERTY TAX 9 3,911,080 3,664,210 3,956,624 (45,544) 101%
VOTED PROPERTY TAX 10 10,000 944,383 15,167 (5,167) 152%
LOCAL RETAIL SALES/USE TAX 11 6,875,000 6,905,122 7,395,114 (520,114) 108%
NATURAL GAS USE TAX 7,040 6,236 9,441 (2,401) 134%
1/10 SALES TAX LOCAL CRIM JUST 687,500 679,138 707,862 (20,362) 103%
ELECTRIC UTILITY TAX 1,604,000 1,580,287 1,693,313 (89,313) 106%
GAS UTILITY TAX 608,000 574,714 686,531 (78,531) 113%
SOLID WASTE UTILITY TAX 313,600 327,242 334,191 (20,591) 107%
WATER UTILITY TAX 1,235,300 1,217,914 1,228,927 6,373 99%
SEWER UTILITY TAX 632,300 629,926 694,870 (62,570) 110%
STORMWATER UTILITY TAX 331,300 328,981 364,927 (33,627) 110%
T.V. CABLE UTILITY TAX 857,600 865,531 868,950 (11,350) 101%
TELEPHONE UTILITY TAX 1,263,200 1,212,526 1,076,870 186,330 85%
PULLTABS TAX 52,000 52,368 53,103 (1,103) 102%
AMUSEMENT GAMES 40 141 777 (737) 1943%
LEASEHOLD EXCISE TAX 262,300 266,223 236,510 25,790 90%
28,871,930 29,265,213 29,536,400 (664,470) 102%
LICENSES AND PERMITS:
FIRE PERMITS-SPECIAL USE 250 310 335 (85) 134%
POLICE - FINGERPRINTING 300 465 770 (470) 257%
PROF AND OCC LICENSE-TAXI 330 - - 330 0%
AMUSEMENTS 4,740 - 6,325 (1,585) 133%
VENDING MACHINE/CONCESSION 50,000 50,490 52,964 (2,964) 106%
FRANCHISE AGREEMENT-COMCAST 716,800 716,840 730,530 (13,730) 102%
FRANCHISE FEE-EDUCATION/GOVERNMENT 42,100 42,216 40,248 1,852 96%
FRANCHISE AGREEMENT-VERIZON/FRONTIER 102,300 102,954 105,604 (3,304) 103%
FRANCHISE AGREEMENT-BLACKROCK 16,600 17,672 13,904 2,696 84%
OLYMPIC VIEW WATER DISTRICT FRANCHISE 298,200 298,389 323,198 (24,998) 108%
GENERAL BUSINESS LICENSE 116,600 131,778 99,293 17,308 85%
DEV SERV PERMIT SURCHARGE 44,940 54,665 77,667 (32,727) 173%
NON-RESIDENT BUS LICENSE 67,800 68,650 71,500 (3,700) 105%
RIGHT OF WAY FRANCHISE FEE 10,700 91,860 22,955 (12,255) 215%
BUILDING STRUCTURE PERMITS 651,100 708,865 905,602 (254,502) 139%
ANIMAL LICENSES 35,090 24,471 27,676 7,414 79%
STREET AND CURB PERMIT 48,150 48,022 42,691 5,459 89%
OTR NON-BUS LIC/PERMITS 13,200 18,196 18,449 (5,249) 140%
2,219,200 2,375,843 2,539,711 (320,511) 114%
INTERGOVERNMENTAL:
DOJ 15-0404-0-1-754 - BULLET PROOF VEST 7,930 6,920 11,118 (3,188) 140%
ROOFTOP SOLAR CHALLENGE II - 5,250 - - 0%
WAASSOC OF SHERIFFS TRAFFIC GRANT - 992 - - 0%
TARGET ZERO TEAMS GRANT 4,000 3,348 1,030 2,970 26%
HIGH VISIBILITY ENFORCEMENT 7,100 4,675 8,226 (1,126) 116%
DOCKSIDE DRILLS GRANT REIMBURSE 3,092 614 3,092 0 100%
WATERFRONT ANALYSIS GRANT - 490,000 10,000 (10,000) 0%
PUD PRIVILEDGE TAX 195,500 197,399 198,479 (2,979) 102%
MVET/SPECIAL DISTRIBUTION 12,680 11,152 11,564 1,116 91%
JUDICIAL SALARY CONTRIBUTION-STATE 18,000 17,677 16,711 1,289 93%
CRIMINAL JUSTICE-SPECIAL PROGRAMS 42,500 40,661 41,971 529 99%
MARIJUANA ENFORCEMENT 23,700 - - 23,700 0%
MARIJUANA EXCISE TAX DISTRIBUTION - - 11,143 (11,143) 0%
DUI - CITIES 3,000 6,313 6,198 (3,198) 207%
LIQUOR EXCISE TAX 191,000 188,912 197,143 (6,143) 103%
LIQUOR BOARD PROFITS 345,600 348,792 345,313 287 100%
MISCELLANEOUS INTERLOCAL REVENUE - 77,153 - - 0%
INTERLOCAL GRANTS - - 35,000 (35,000) 0%
VERDANT INTERLOCAL GRANTS 2,000 7,754 2,000 - 100%
POLICE TRAINING CLASSES - - 300 (300) 0%
856,102 1,407,614 899,288 (43,186) 105%
REVENUES - GENERAL FUNDCITY OF EDMONDS
9 2017 EMS PropertyTax revenues are $292,414 higher than 2016 revenues.
11 2017 Local Retail Sales/Use Tax revenues are $489,991 higher than 2016 revenues. Please also see pages pages 18 & 19.
8 2017 Real Personal/Property Tax revenues are $202,952 higher than 2016 revenues.
10 Difference between 2016 and 2017 is due to Public Safety Debt being paid off in 2016, and taxes no longer levied in 2017.
6.4.a
Packet Pg. 97 Attachment: Complete Preliminary December 2017 Financial Report (Preliminary 2017 December Quarterly Financial Report)
4
Page 2 of 3
Title
2017 Amended
Budget
12/31/2016
Revenues
12/31/2017
Revenues
Amount
Remaining % Received
CHARGES FOR GOODS AND SERVICES:
MUNICIPAL COURT CIVIL FILINGS - 49 - - 0%
COURT RECORD SERVICES - - 579 (579) 0%
RECORD/LEGAL INSTRUMENTS 2,000 2,572 4,019 (2,019) 201%
ATM SURCHARGE FEES 300 408 537 (237) 179%
CREDIT CARD FEES 15,000 - 10,915 4,085 73%
D/M COURT REC SER 10 47 246 (236) 2456%
CIVIL FEE - APPEAL - - 53 (53) 0%
WARRANT PREPARATION FEE - - 775 (775) 0%
IT TIME PAY FEE - - 271 (271) 0%
MUNIC.-DIST. COURT CURR EXPEN 600 577 238 362 40%
SALE MAPS & BOOKS 100 4 36 64 36%
CLERKS TIME FOR SALE OF PARKING PERMITS 25,100 25,090 25,090 10 100%
BID SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 600 548 - 600 0%
PHOTOCOPIES 2,000 1,009 953 1,047 48%
POLICE DISCLOSURE REQUESTS 4,000 3,989 2,428 1,572 61%
ENGINEERING FEES AND CHARGES 12 200,000 216,919 416,959 (216,959) 208%
SNO-ISLE 58,000 74,184 82,902 (24,902) 143%
PASSPORTS AND NATURALIZATION FEES 17,000 19,609 21,950 (4,950) 129%
POLICE SERVICES SPECIAL EVENTS 32,603 31,852 32,603 0 100%
CAMPUS SAFETY-EDM. SCH. DIST.68,000 13,689 14,721 53,279 22%
WOODWAY-LAW PROTECTION 44,538 61,411 60,856 (16,318) 137%
MISCELLANEOUS POLICE SERVICES 1,500 3,038 - 1,500 0%
DUI EMERGENCY FIRE SERVICES 300 - - 300 0%
FIRE PROTECTION & EMS FOR DUI - 63 77 (77) 0%
FIRE DISTRICT #1 STATION BILLINGS 45,000 48,748 52,894 (7,894) 118%
LEGAL SERVICES - 177 - - 0%
ADULT PROBATION SERVICE CHARGE 56,000 66,778 49,585 6,415 89%
ELECTRONIC MONITORING - 100 - - 0%
BOOKING FEES 4,200 3,663 2,704 1,496 64%
FIRE CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION FEES 8,560 23,806 23,139 (14,579) 270%
EMERGENCY SERVICE FEES 8,000 6,923 3,779 4,221 47%
EMS TRANSPORT USER FEE 824,200 900,604 828,041 (3,841) 100%
FIBER SERVICES - 10,780 - - 0%
INTERGOVERNMENTAL FIBER SERVICES - 7,200 - - 0%
FLEX FUEL PAYMENTS FROM STATIONS 1,800 2,274 2,547 (747) 141%
ANIMAL CONTROL SHELTER 250 404 55 195 22%
ZONING/SUBDIVISION FEE 80,250 99,938 124,171 (43,921) 155%
PLAN CHECKING FEES 458,500 510,697 458,206 294 100%
FIRE PLAN CHECK FEES 3,210 11,520 12,720 (9,510) 396%
PLANNING 1% INSPECTION FEE 1,600 2,294 1,646 (46) 103%
S.E.P.A. REVIEW 2,140 6,710 10,050 (7,910) 470%
CRITICAL AREA STUDY 18,190 20,435 17,390 800 96%
DV COORDINATOR SERVICES 11,460 11,119 11,459 1 100%
GYM AND WEIGHTROOM FEES 12,000 12,923 13,335 (1,335) 111%
LOCKER FEES - 120 30 (30) 0%
PROGRAM FEES 910,100 897,579 825,641 84,459 91%
TAXABLE RECREATION ACTIVITIES 1,300 1,023 1,504 (204) 116%
WINTER MARKET REGISTRATION FEES 11,000 5,400 5,100 5,900 46%
BIRD FEST REGISTRATION FEES 750 916 1,030 (280) 137%
INTERFUND REIMBURSEMENT-CONTRACT SVCS 2,044,540 2,293,193 2,369,392 (324,852) 116%
4,974,701 5,400,381 5,490,623 (515,922) 110%
CITY OF EDMONDS
REVENUES - GENERAL FUND
12 2017 Engineering Fees and Charges are $200,040 higher than 2016 revenues.
6.4.a
Packet Pg. 98 Attachment: Complete Preliminary December 2017 Financial Report (Preliminary 2017 December Quarterly Financial Report)
5
Page 3 of 3
Title
2017 Amended
Budget
12/31/2016
Revenues
12/31/2017
Revenues
Amount
Remaining % Received
FINES AND FORFEITURES:
PROOF OF VEHICLE INS PENALTY 7,200 6,564 4,851 2,349 67%
TRAFFIC INFRACTION PENALTIES 232,500 214,231 216,333 16,167 93%
NC TRAFFIC INFRACTION 32,800 53,275 33,829 (1,029) 103%
CRT COST FEE CODE LEG ASSESSMENT (LGA)20,700 21,379 23,015 (2,315) 111%
CURRENT TRAFFIC INFRACTIONS - - - - 0%
NON-TRAFFIC INFRACTION PENALTIES - 40,088 1,000 (1,000) 0%
OTHER INFRACTIONS '04 2,100 1,761 2,544 (444) 121%
PARKING INFRACTION PENALTIES 25,300 42,657 71,609 (46,309) 283%
PARK/INDDISZONE 3,600 3,472 1,954 1,646 54%
DWI PENALTIES 8,000 19,626 8,458 (458) 106%
DUI - DP ACCT 2,800 2,389 1,648 1,152 59%
CRIM CNV FEE DUI 500 437 170 330 34%
DUI - DP FEE - - 176 (176) 0%
OTHER CRIMINAL TRAF MISDEM PEN - 88 260 (260) 0%
CRIMINAL TRAFFIC MISDEMEANOR 8/03 33,600 30,951 33,446 154 100%
CRIMINAL CONVICTION FEE CT 2,000 2,841 2,488 (488) 124%
CRIM CONV FEE CT 2,000 1,584 1,547 453 77%
OTHER NON-TRAF MISDEMEANOR PEN - - 32 (32) 0%
OTHER NON TRAFFIC MISD. 8/03 9,300 8,352 8,729 571 94%
COURT DV PENALTY ASSESSMENT 600 445 570 30 95%
CRIMINAL CONVICTION FEE CN 1,900 1,687 1,257 643 66%
CRIM CONV FEE CN 500 577 456 44 91%
CRIMINAL COSTS-RECOUPMENTS 30,900 23,870 7,859 23,041 25%
PUBLIC DEFENSE RECOUPMENT 25,600 23,018 16,787 8,813 66%
BANK CHARGE FOR CONV. DEFENDANT 6,000 7,532 8,996 (2,996) 150%
COURT INTERPRETER COSTS 100 75 246 (146) 246%
BUS. LICENSE PERMIT PENALTY 11,000 13,585 9,630 1,370 88%
MISC FINES AND PENALTIES 1,400 1,565 2,040 (640) 146%
460,400 522,051 459,929 471 100%
MISCELLANEOUS:
INVESTMENT INTEREST 40,400 58,828 122,707 (82,307) 304%
INTEREST ON COUNTY TAXES 5,700 6,412 11,722 (6,022) 206%
INTEREST - COURT COLLECTIONS 5,400 5,950 6,187 (787) 115%
PARKING 15,600 16,475 17,942 (2,342) 115%
SPACE/FACILITIES RENTALS 147,000 147,324 128,769 18,231 88%
BRACKET ROOM RENTAL 5,000 4,800 4,840 160 97%
LEASES LONG-TERM 175,000 179,444 182,969 (7,969) 105%
OTHER RENTS & USE CHARGES 2,400 1,800 1,800 600 75%
DONATION/CONTRIBUTION - 1,500 1,133 (1,133) 0%
PARKS DONATIONS 4,350 4,350 3,650 700 84%
BIRD FEST CONTRIBUTIONS 3,000 2,142 2,044 956 68%
VOLUNTEER PICNIC CONTRIBUTIONS 1,000 1,701 - 1,000 0%
POLICE CONTRIBUTIONS FROM PRIV SOURCES 55,943 - 58,428 (2,485) 104%
PARKS GRANTS - PRIVATE SOURCES - - 1,030 (1,030) 0%
SALE OF JUNK/SALVAGE 300 304 4,945 (4,645) 1648%
SALES OF UNCLAIM PROPERTY 3,000 7,190 2,353 647 78%
CONFISCATED AND FORFEITED PROPERTY 2,000 - - 2,000 0%
OTHER JUDGEMENT/SETTLEMENT 2,000 3,876 31,468 (29,468) 1573%
POLICE JUDGMENTS/RESTITUTION 200 296 99 101 50%
CASHIER'S OVERAGES/SHORTAGES - 254 276 (276) 0%
OTHER MISC REVENUES 2,000 12,336 2,580 (580) 129%
SMALL OVERPAYMENT 30 26 42 (12) 140%
NSF FEES - PARKS & REC 120 - - 120 0%
NSF FEES - MUNICIPAL COURT 300 178 346 (46) 115%
NSF FEES - POLICE - - 60 (60) 0%
US BANK REBATE 7,500 6,947 7,827 (327) 104%
478,243 462,132 593,216 (114,973) 124%
TRANSFERS-IN:
PROCEEDS OF REFUNDING DEBT 13 - 549,095 - - 0%
INSURANCE RECOVERIES - 58,451 7,143 (7,143) 0%
OPERATING TRANSFER-IN - 56,860 - - 0%
TRANSFER FROM FUND 127 26,300 25,835 26,300 - 100%
26,300 690,241 33,443 (7,143) 127%
TOTAL GENERAL FUND REVENUE 37,886,876$ 40,123,476$ 39,552,609$ (1,665,733)$ 104%
CITY OF EDMONDS
13 Difference between 2016 and 2017 is due to Bond Proceeds from Refunding 2007 Debt in November of 2016.
REVENUES - GENERAL FUND
6.4.a
Packet Pg. 99 Attachment: Complete Preliminary December 2017 Financial Report (Preliminary 2017 December Quarterly Financial Report)
6
Page 1 of 6
Title
2017 Amended
Budget
12/31/2016
Expenditures
12/31/2017
Expenditures
Amount
Remaining % Spent
GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES (001)
SALARIES AND WAGES 14,814,103$ 13,569,133$ 14,233,337$ 580,766$ 96%
OVERTIME 506,493 522,114 576,741 (70,248) 114%
HOLIDAY BUY BACK 226,420 195,915 201,476 24,944 89%
BENEFITS 5,475,855 5,188,028 5,586,670 (110,815) 102%
UNIFORMS 85,110 80,392 74,707 10,403 88%
SUPPLIES 386,509 379,291 370,679 15,830 96%
SMALL EQUIPMENT 64,107 138,781 75,248 (11,141) 117%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3,660,453 3,048,318 2,967,593 692,860 81%
COMMUNICATIONS 159,170 190,775 147,756 11,414 93%
TRAVEL 50,430 41,273 48,511 1,919 96%
EXCISE TAXES 6,500 - 4,820 1,680 74%
ADVERTISING - 4,662 - - 0%
RENTAL/LEASE 1,708,050 934,810 1,701,796 6,254 100%
INSURANCE 609,550 538,732 616,495 (6,945) 101%
UTILITIES 457,800 489,902 513,093 (55,293) 112%
REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 224,830 322,314 241,761 (16,931) 108%
MISCELLANEOUS 396,800 300,425 300,805 95,995 76%
INTERGOVERNMENTAL SERVICES 10,016,530 9,948,606 9,911,131 105,399 99%
INTERGOVERNMENTAL PAYMENTS 135,000 125,000 70,000 65,000 52%
INTERFUND SUBSIDIES 14 1,263,200 3,429,141 1,284,758 (21,558) 102%
BUILDINGS 10,197 - - 10,197 0%
MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT 134,263 56,662 91,135 43,128 68%
GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND PRINCIPAL 164,790 699,636 170,160 (5,370) 103%
DEBT ISSUE COSTS - 5,327 - - 0%
OTHER DEBT 500 235 222 278 44%
INTEREST ON LONG-TERM EXTERNAL DEBT 39,580 48,058 27,979 11,601 71%
40,596,240$ 40,257,530$ 39,216,873$ 1,379,367$ 97%
LEOFF-MEDICAL INS. RESERVE (009)
BENEFITS 183,190$ 156,239$ 148,068$ 35,122$ 81%
PENSION AND DISABILITY PAYMENTS 259,597 96,548 253,428 6,169 98%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 7,000 1,286 8,828 (1,828) 126%
TRAVEL - 447 - - 0%
MISCELLANEOUS 280 770 400 (120) 143%
450,067$ 255,291$ 410,725$ 39,342$ 91%
RISK MANAGEMENT RESERVE FUND (011)
MISCELLANEOUS 100,000$ -$ 81,277$ 18,723$ 81%
100,000$ -$ 81,277$ 18,723$ 81%
MULTIMODAL TRANSPORTATION FUND (013)
INTERFUND SUBSIDIES -$ 56,860$ -$ -$ 0%-$ 56,860$ -$ -$ 0%
HISTORIC PRESERVATION GIFT FUND (014)
SUPPLIES 100$ -$ -$ 100$ 0%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 200 - - 200 0%
MISCELLANEOUS 5,100 - 5,437 (337) 107%
5,400$ -$ 5,437$ (37)$ 101%
BUILDING MAINTENANCE SUBFUND (016)
SUPPLIES -$ 1,756$ 22,654$ (22,654)$ 0%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 77,000 391,031 81,038 (4,038) 105%
REPAIRS & MAINTENANENCE 193,500 205,349 210,030 (16,530) 109%
MISCELLANEOUS - 11,760 - - 0%
MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT - 191,821 - - 0%
CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 350,000 1,411,794 26,440 323,560 8%620,500$ 2,213,511$ 340,162$ 280,338$ 55%
DRUG ENFORCEMENT FUND (104)
FUEL CONSUMED 3,000$ 1,350$ 2,001$ 999$ 67%
SMALL EQUIPMENT 5,000 5,768 - 5,000 0%
COMMUNICATIONS 2,230 1,676 815 1,415 37%
REPAIR/MAINT 800 - - 800 0%
MISCELLANEOUS 20,000 10,459 5,000 15,000 25%
INTERGOVERNMENTAL SERVICES 45,000 43,039 41,642 3,358 93%
76,030$ 62,292$ 49,458$ 26,572$ 65%
EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL
CITY OF EDMONDS
14 Difference between 2016 and 2017 is primarily due to final payment of 2014 debt.
6.4.a
Packet Pg. 100 Attachment: Complete Preliminary December 2017 Financial Report (Preliminary 2017 December Quarterly Financial Report)
7
Page 2 of 6
Title
2017 Amended
Budget
12/31/2016
Expenditures
12/31/2017
Expenditures
Amount
Remaining % Spent
STREET FUND (111)
SALARIES AND WAGES 555,070$ 579,092$ 519,755$ 35,315$ 94%
OVERTIME 18,400 25,395 29,914 (11,514) 163%
BENEFITS 318,720 303,678 270,940 47,780 85%
UNIFORMS 6,000 3,745 3,711 2,289 62%
SUPPLIES 350,000 171,386 229,749 120,251 66%
SMALL EQUIPMENT 24,000 6,645 11,054 12,946 46%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 15,050 17,160 19,193 (4,143) 128%
COMMUNICATIONS 3,500 4,335 7,506 (4,006) 214%
TRAVEL 1,000 - - 1,000 0%
RENTAL/LEASE 181,020 191,086 181,931 (911) 101%
INSURANCE 113,230 97,912 110,508 2,722 98%
UTILITIES 270,170 268,000 272,803 (2,633) 101%
REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 111,550 26,585 28,387 83,163 25%
MISCELLANEOUS 25,000 13,873 2,697 22,303 11%
INTERGOVERNMENTAL SERVICES 5,000 1,990 5,324 (324) 106%
MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT - - 43,427 (43,427) 0%
GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND PRINCIPAL 3,490 45,225 3,900 (410) 112%
INTEREST ON LONG-TERM EXTERNAL DEBT 1,610 1,818 709 901 44%
DEBT ISSUE COSTS - 412 - - 0%
OTHER INTEREST & DEBT SERVICE COSTS - 1 - - 0%
2,002,810$ 1,758,339$ 1,741,508$ 261,302$ 87%
COMBINED STREET CONST/IMPROVE (112)
SALARIES AND WAGES -$ -$ 15,383$ (15,383)$ 0%
OVERTIME - - 672 (672) 0%
BENEFITS - - 6,409 (6,409) 0%
SMALL EQUIPMENT - - 2,056 (2,056) 0%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,625,385 719,681 1,265,374 1,360,011 48%
REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE - 467,086 5,228 (5,228) 0%
INTERFUND SUBSIDIES 328,100 136,194 40,711 287,389 12%
LAND - 208,554 - - 0%
MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT - - 8,166 (8,166) 0%
CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 4,236,922 1,497,139 3,629,473 607,449 86%
INTERGOVERNMENTAL LOANS 72,220 72,201 72,201 19 100%
INTEREST 3,050 3,396 3,035 15 100%
7,265,677$ 3,104,251$ 5,048,708$ 2,216,969$ 69%
MUNICIPAL ARTS ACQUIS. FUND (117)
SUPPLIES 4,700$ 5,032$ 4,013$ 687$ 85%
SMALL EQUIPMENT 1,700 685 902 798 53%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 166,500 58,248 49,567 116,933 30%
TRAVEL 80 11 35 46 43%
RENTAL/LEASE 2,000 - - 2,000 0%
REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 300 - - 300 0%
MISCELLANEOUS 6,600 5,268 4,127 2,473 63%
181,880$ 69,244$ 58,643$ 123,237$ 32%
HOTEL/MOTEL TAX REVENUE FUND (120)
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 93,300$ 82,696$ 97,846$ (4,546)$ 105%
MISCELLANEOUS 6,800 994 700 6,100 10%
INTERFUND SUBSIDIES 4,000 4,000 4,000 - 100%
CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS - 60,000 - - 0%
104,100$ 147,691$ 102,546$ 1,554$ 99%
EMPLOYEE PARKING PERMIT FUND (121)
SUPPLIES 1,790$ 1,726$ 1,638$ 152$ 92%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 25,090 25,090 25,090 - 100%
26,880$ 26,816$ 26,728$ 152$ 99%
YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP FUND (122)
MISCELLANEOUS 2,000$ 1,585$ 1,375$ 625$ 69%
2,000$ 1,585$ 1,375$ 625$ 69%
TOURISM PROMOTIONAL FUND/ARTS (123)
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 57,200$ 26,793$ 51,806$ 5,394$ 91%
MISCELLANEOUS 4,500 3,203 3,655 845 81%
61,700$ 29,996$ 55,461$ 6,239$ 90%
CITY OF EDMONDS
EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL
6.4.a
Packet Pg. 101 Attachment: Complete Preliminary December 2017 Financial Report (Preliminary 2017 December Quarterly Financial Report)
8
Page 3 of 6
Title
2017 Amended
Budget
12/31/2016
Expenditures
12/31/2017
Expenditures
Amount
Remaining % Spent
REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 2 (125)
SUPPLIES 21,000$ 48,756$ 54,963$ (33,963)$ 262%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 150,000 180,169 452,586 (302,586) 302%
RENTAL/LEASE - 2,790 - - 0%
UTILITIES - - 1,649 (1,649) 0%
REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 140,000 113,591 305,000 (165,000) 218%
MISCELLANEOUS - 181 - - 0%
CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 2,795,566 323,428 1,105,033 1,690,533 40%
3,106,566$ 668,915$ 1,919,230$ 1,187,336$ 62%
REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 1, PARKS ACQ (126)
SALARIES AND WAGES -$ 14,404$ -$ -$ 0%
SUPPLIES - 4,623 - - 0%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 118,255 298,758 158,693 (40,438) 134%
REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE - 567,277 311,654 (311,654) 0%
INTERFUND SUBSIDIES 142,330 139,425 142,325 5 100%
LAND 200,000 436,864 43,201 156,799 22%
CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 2,159,843 73,154 382,224 1,777,619 18%
GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS 20,280 263,250 22,701 (2,421) 112%
INTEREST 9,350 10,584 4,125 5,225 44%
DEBT ISSUE COSTS - 2,396 - - 0%
OTHER INTEREST & OTHER DEBT SERVICE COSTS - 79 72 (72) 0%
2,650,058$ 1,810,814$ 1,064,996$ 1,585,062$ 40%
GIFTS CATALOG FUND (127)
SUPPLIES 17,820$ 6,156$ 1,638$ 16,182$ 9%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 6,500 6,443 - 6,500 0%
MISCELLANEOUS 600 - - 600 0%
INTERFUND SUBSIDIES 26,300 25,835 26,300 - 100%
51,220$ 38,434$ 27,938$ 23,282$ 55%
SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND (129)
INTERFUND SUBSIDIES 40,000$ -$ 39,535$ 465$ 99%
40,000$ -$ 39,535$ 465$ 99%
CEMETERY MAINTENANCE/IMPROVEMENT (130)
SALARIES AND WAGES 124,410$ 81,638$ 74,427$ 49,983$ 60%
OVERTIME 3,500 1,671 3,526 (26) 101%
BENEFITS 35,910 35,115 35,095 815 98%
UNIFORMS 1,000 - - 1,000 0%
SUPPLIES 24,500 4,764 7,037 17,463 29%
SUPPLIES PURCHASED FOR INVENTORY/RESALE 20,000 19,285 10,704 9,296 54%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 4,200 3,896 6,712 (2,512) 160%
COMMUNICATIONS 1,410 999 1,376 34 98%
TRAVEL 500 - - 500 0%
RENTAL/LEASE 10,790 11,550 10,790 (0) 100%
UTILITIES 3,800 1,999 5,208 (1,408) 137%
REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 500 - - 500 0%
MISCELLANEOUS 4,000 3,371 5,215 (1,215) 130%
234,520$ 164,289$ 160,090$ 74,430$ 68%
PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND (132)
SUPPLIES 20,000$ 25$ -$ 20,000$ 0%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 600,000 47,017 89,146 510,854 15%
INTERFUND SUBSIDIES 3,000 - - 3,000 0%
LAND - 1,466,247 - - 0%
CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 2,096,363 515,848 213,234 1,883,129 10%
2,719,363$ 2,029,137$ 302,380$ 2,416,983$ 11%
SISTER CITY COMMISSION (138)
SALARIES AND WAGES -$ 45$ -$ -$ 0%
BENEFITS - 5 - - 0%
SUPPLIES 1,500 255 390 1,110 26%
TRAVEL 4,500 2,515 2,839 1,661 63%
MISCELLANEOUS 4,500 2,850 2,794 1,706 62%
10,500$ 5,669$ 6,023$ 4,477$ 57%
TRANSPORTATION BENEFIT DISTRICT (139)
INSURANCE -$ 2,500$ -$ -$ 0%
INTERGOVERNMENTAL SERVICES - 598,816 - - 0%
-$ 601,316$ -$ -$ 0%
CITY OF EDMONDS
EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL
6.4.a
Packet Pg. 102 Attachment: Complete Preliminary December 2017 Financial Report (Preliminary 2017 December Quarterly Financial Report)
9
Page 4 of 6
Title
2017 Amended
Budget
12/31/2016
Expenditures
12/31/2017
Expenditures
Amount
Remaining % Spent
BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT FUND (140)
SUPPLIES -$ 21,192$ 5,483$ (5,483)$ 0%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES - 61,293 84,831 (84,831) 0%
MISCELLANEOUS - 11,373 2,007 (2,007) 0%-$ 93,858$ 92,321$ (92,321)$ 0%
LID FUND CONTROL (211)
INTERFUND SUBSIDIES 16,450$ 7,600$ 16,450$ -$ 100%
16,450$ 7,600$ 16,450$ -$ 100%
LID GUARANTY FUND (213)
INTERFUND SUBSIDIES -$ 105,135$ -$ -$ 0%
-$ 105,135$ -$ -$ 0%
2012 LTGO DEBT SERVIC FUND (231)
GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND 565,450$ 536,265$ 565,444$ 6$ 100%
INTEREST 129,880 140,602 129,877 3 100%
OTHER INTEREST & DEBT SERVICE COSTS 500 - - 500 0%
695,830$ 676,867$ 695,321$ 509$ 100%
2014 DEBT SERVICE FUND (232)
2014 PRINCIPAL PAYMENT -$ 933,208$ -$ -$ 0%
INTEREST - 3,221 - - 0%
-$ 936,429$ -$ -$ 0%
WATER FUND (421)
SALARIES AND WAGES 844,510$ 776,424$ 736,913$ 107,597$ 87%
OVERTIME 24,000 25,018 20,833 3,167 87%
BENEFITS 405,720 359,325 345,434 60,286 85%
UNIFORMS 4,000 3,000 4,727 (727) 118%
SUPPLIES 150,000 120,616 140,699 9,301 94%
WATER PURCHASED FOR RESALE 1,667,500 1,598,912 1,803,521 (136,021) 108%
SUPPLIES PURCHASED FOR INVENTORY/RESALE 143,000 124,923 206,445 (63,445) 144%
SMALL EQUIPMENT 19,730 10,087 6,115 13,615 31%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,181,281 1,150,662 1,636,269 545,012 75%
COMMUNICATIONS 30,000 29,597 29,829 171 99%
TRAVEL 200 - 45 155 23%
EXCISE TAXES 340,000 420,933 433,540 (93,540) 128%
RENTAL/LEASE 146,130 97,858 144,501 1,629 99%
INSURANCE 56,050 52,335 58,214 (2,164) 104%
UTILITIES 35,000 25,839 28,582 6,418 82%
REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 17,500 52,961 387,983 (370,483) 2217%
MISCELLANEOUS 83,500 75,183 94,553 (11,053) 113%
INTERGOVERNMENTAL SERVICES 30,000 32,496 38,184 (8,184) 127%
INTERFUND TAXES 1,229,110 1,217,914 1,228,927 183 100%
INTERFUND SUBSIDIES 642,020 639,215 642,016 4 100%
MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT 25,000 15,065 - 25,000 0%
CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 4,488,771 1,568,656 1,831,365 2,657,406 41%
GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS 2,340 2,295 2,619 (279) 112%
REVENUE BONDS 335,510 323,868 335,504 6 100%
INTERGOVERNMENTAL LOANS 25,840 25,839 25,839 1 100%
INTEREST 246,940 256,375 246,323 617 100%
DEBT ISSUE COSTS - 276 - - 0%
OTHER INTEREST & DEBT SERVICE COSTS - 378 375 (375) 0%
13,173,652$ 9,006,049$ 10,429,355$ 2,744,297$ 79%
CITY OF EDMONDS
EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL
6.4.a
Packet Pg. 103 Attachment: Complete Preliminary December 2017 Financial Report (Preliminary 2017 December Quarterly Financial Report)
10
Page 5 of 6
Title
2017 Amended
Budget
12/31/2016
Expenditures
12/31/2017
Expenditures
Amount
Remaining % Spent
STORM FUND (422)
SALARIES AND WAGES 523,320$ 521,872$ 595,532$ (72,212)$ 114%
OVERTIME 6,000 14,335 12,578 (6,578) 210%
BENEFITS 262,680 265,373 312,763 (50,083) 119%
UNIFORMS 6,500 5,756 5,689 811 88%
SUPPLIES 46,000 34,047 39,233 6,767 85%
SMALL EQUIPMENT 5,730 1,823 6,873 (1,143) 120%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,191,297 1,502,439 1,131,838 1,059,460 52%
COMMUNICATIONS 3,200 3,652 5,453 (2,253) 170%
TRAVEL 4,300 300 - 4,300 0%
EXCISE TAXES 55,000 54,350 59,416 (4,416) 108%
RENTAL/LEASE 264,970 248,248 260,398 4,572 98%
INSURANCE 71,540 63,187 72,028 (488) 101%
UTILITES 10,500 9,421 9,789 711 93%
REPAIR & MAINTENANCE 13,000 14,183 52,858 (39,858) 407%
MISCELLANEOUS 101,000 73,919 89,379 11,621 88%
INTERGOVERNMENTAL SERVICES 150,000 139,029 118,354 31,646 79%
INTERFUND TAXES AND OPERATING ASSESSMENT 330,430 328,981 364,927 (34,497) 110%
INTERFUND SUBSIDIES 293,910 290,752 279,445 14,465 95%
MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT - - 18,630 (18,630) 0%
CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 3,517,344 1,017,870 270,691 3,246,653 8%
GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS 85,440 83,793 95,635 (10,195) 112%
REVENUE BONDS 164,000 158,297 163,993 7 100%
INTERGOVERNMENTAL LOANS 32,070 32,063 32,063 8 100%
INTEREST 158,480 167,835 136,480 22,000 86%
DEBT ISSUE COSTS - 10,095 - - 0%
OTHER INTEREST & DEBT SERVICE COSTS - 193 165 (165) 0%
8,296,711$ 5,041,811$ 4,134,213$ 4,162,498$ 50%
SEWER FUND (423)
SALARIES AND WAGES 1,783,120$ 1,710,519$ 1,676,647$ 106,473$ 94%
OVERTIME 95,000 91,465 99,065 (4,065) 104%
BENEFITS 784,430 766,178 768,089 16,341 98%
UNIFORMS 9,500 6,538 7,466 2,034 79%
SUPPLIES 417,200 281,380 235,852 181,348 57%
FUEL CONSUMED 80,000 47,744 74,580 5,420 93%
SUPPLIES PURCHASED FOR INV OR RESALE 4,000 - 2,989 1,011 75%
SMALL EQUIPMENT 62,730 26,850 38,969 23,761 62%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,837,472 2,399,116 2,381,089 (543,617) 130%
COMMUNICATIONS 43,000 39,853 40,657 2,343 95%
TRAVEL 5,000 3,122 54 4,947 1%
EXCISE TAXES 170,000 194,744 220,201 (50,201) 130%
RENTAL/LEASE 306,650 179,111 302,604 4,046 99%
INSURANCE 109,270 106,915 116,720 (7,450) 107%
UTILITIES 1,217,860 1,135,718 1,154,616 63,244 95%
REPAIR & MAINTENANCE 340,000 1,078,968 360,339 (20,339) 106%
MISCELLANEOUS 117,950 86,901 102,660 15,290 87%
INTERGOVERNMENTAL SERVICES 178,000 162,276 138,256 39,744 78%
INTERFUND TAXES AND OPERATING ASSESSMENT 629,140 629,926 694,870 (65,730) 110%
INTERFUND SUBSIDIES 2,800,118 2,222,004 2,624,635 175,483 94%
MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT 110,000 94,337 258,036 (148,036) 235%
CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 5,854,736 2,463,288 3,632,853 2,221,883 62%
GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS 132,950 130,123 145,273 (12,323) 109%
REVENUE BONDS 75,510 72,836 75,503 7 100%
INTERGOVERNMENTAL LOANS 171,240 170,603 171,230 10 100%
INTEREST 114,500 95,235 82,276 32,224 72%
DEBT ISSUE COSTS - 12,214 - - 0%
OTHER INTEREST & DEBT SERVICE COSTS - 6,242 5,939 (5,939) 0%
17,449,376$ 14,214,206$ 15,411,465$ 2,037,911$ 88%
BOND RESERVE FUND (424)
REVENUE BONDS 680,020$ 655,000$ 680,000$ 20$ 100%
INTEREST 1,308,700 1,334,884 1,308,684 16 100%
OTHER INTEREST & DEBT SERVICE COSTS 1,000 - - 1,000 0%
1,989,720$ 1,989,884$ 1,988,684$ 1,036$ 100%
EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL
CITY OF EDMONDS
6.4.a
Packet Pg. 104 Attachment: Complete Preliminary December 2017 Financial Report (Preliminary 2017 December Quarterly Financial Report)
11
Page 6 of 6
Title
2017 Amended
Budget
12/31/2016
Expenditures
12/31/2017
Expenditures
Amount
Remaining % Spent
EQUIPMENT RENTAL FUND (511)
SALARIES AND WAGES 238,360$ 224,287$ 235,126$ 3,234$ 99%
OVERTIME 2,000 488 48 1,952 2%
BENEFITS 103,580 98,024 104,157 (577) 101%
UNIFORMS 1,000 952 716 284 72%
SUPPLIES 110,000 84,861 79,962 30,038 73%
FUEL CONSUMED 1,000 - - 1,000 0%
SUPPLIES PURCHASED FOR INVENTORY/RESALE 294,200 134,869 222,002 72,198 75%
SMALL EQUIPMENT 110,111 22,322 55,394 54,717 50%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 44,000 46,517 2,351 41,649 5%
COMMUNICATIONS 3,000 2,418 2,314 686 77%
TRAVEL 1,000 1,000 - 1,000 0%
RENTAL/LEASE 15,350 19,157 14,995 355 98%
INSURANCE 29,010 29,967 26,351 2,659 91%
UTILITIES 14,000 11,891 12,886 1,114 92%
REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 64,246 51,980 58,680 5,566 91%
MISCELLANEOUS 12,000 7,266 8,196 3,804 68%
INTERGOVERNMENTAL SERVICES 2,500 1,455 1,765 735 71%
INTERFUND SUBSIDIES 10,450 - 10,450 - 100%
MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT 978,366 838,650 971,846 6,520 99%
2,034,173$ 1,576,102$ 1,807,239$ 226,934$ 89%
TECHNOLOGY RENTAL FUND (512)
SALARIES AND WAGES 277,270$ -$ 276,098$ 1,173$ 100%
OVERTIME 2,000 - 30 1,970 2%
BENEFITS 92,150 - 93,053 (903) 101%
SUPPLIES 5,000 - 12,737 (7,737) 255%
SMALL EQUIPMENT 57,700 - 57,582 118 100%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 114,000 - 27,163 86,837 24%
COMMUNICATIONS 65,270 - 42,827 22,443 66%
TRAVEL 1,500 - (17) 1,517 -1%
RENTAL/LEASE 7,850 - 7,868 (18) 100%
REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 241,390 - 179,622 61,768 74%
MISCELLANEOUS 5,000 - 17,643 (12,643) 353%
MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT 56,000 - - 56,000 0%
925,130$ -$ 714,607$ 210,523$ 77%
FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND (617)
BENEFITS 22,550$ 16,555$ 18,357$ 4,193$ 81%
PENSION AND DISABILITY PAYMENTS 48,320 27,936 48,062 258 99%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,200 214 1,222 (22) 102%
72,070$ 44,705$ 67,641$ 4,429$ 94%
TOTAL EXPENDITURE ALL FUNDS 104,958,623$ 86,994,625$ 86,016,387$ 18,942,236$ 82%
EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL
CITY OF EDMONDS
6.4.a
Packet Pg. 105 Attachment: Complete Preliminary December 2017 Financial Report (Preliminary 2017 December Quarterly Financial Report)
12
Page 1 of 1
Title
2017 Amended
Budget
12/31/2016
Expenditures
12/31/2017
Expenditures
Amount
Remaining % Spent
CITY COUNCIL 376,120$ 243,590$ 268,921$ 107,199$ 71%
OFFICE OF MAYOR 276,700 255,933 273,638 3,062 99%
HUMAN RESOURCES 456,490 366,117 394,259 62,231 86%
MUNICIPAL COURT 1,016,040 878,809 987,572 28,468 97%
CITY CLERK 640,700 571,620 632,191 8,509 99%
FINANCE 1,061,570 1,594,043 1,046,698 14,872 99%
CITY ATTORNEY 818,780 726,741 802,103 16,677 98%
NON-DEPARTMENTAL 12,992,880 15,335,077 12,743,022 249,858 98%
POLICE SERVICES 10,769,230 9,496,074 10,488,864 280,366 97%
COMMUNITY SERVICES/ECONOMIC DEV.576,730 511,942 549,794 26,936 95%
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 3,117,387 2,386,294 2,823,518 293,869 91%
PARKS & RECREATION 4,185,215 3,648,633 3,884,744 300,471 93%
PUBLIC WORKS 2,713,370 2,782,287 2,639,574 73,796 97%
FACILITIES MAINTENANCE 1,595,028 1,460,372 1,681,976 (86,948) 105%
40,596,240$ 40,257,530$ 39,216,873$ 1,379,367$ 97%
Title
2017 Amended
Budget
12/31/2016
Expenditures
12/31/2017
Expenditures
Amount
Remaining % Spent
WATER UTILITY FUND 13,173,652$ 9,006,049$ 10,429,355$ 2,744,297$ 79%
STORM UTILITY FUND 8,296,711 5,041,811 4,134,213 4,162,498 50%
SEWER/WWTP UTILITY FUND 17,449,376 14,214,206 15,411,465 2,037,911 88%
BOND RESERVE FUND 1,989,720 1,989,884 1,988,684 1,036 100%
40,909,459$ 30,251,950$ 31,963,716$ 8,945,743$ 78%
EXPENDITURES - GENERAL FUND - BY DEPARTMENT IN SUMMARY
EXPENDITURES - UTILITY- BY FUND IN SUMMARY
CITY OF EDMONDS
CITY OF EDMONDS
6.4.a
Packet Pg. 106 Attachment: Complete Preliminary December 2017 Financial Report (Preliminary 2017 December Quarterly Financial Report)
13
Page 1 of 4
Title
2017 Amended
Budget
12/31/2016
Expenditures
12/31/2017
Expenditures
Amount
Remaining % Spent
CITY COUNCIL
SALARIES 144,170$ 129,449$ 149,178$ (5,008)$ 103%
OVERTIME 1,000 140 - 1,000 0%
BENEFITS 58,520 92,845 93,903 (35,383) 160%
SUPPLIES 2,000 1,747 1,079 921 54%
SMALL EQUIPMENT - 2,980 285 (285) 0%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 126,160 1,432 2,172 123,988 2%
COMMUNICATIONS 3,000 3,611 3,601 (601) 120%
TRAVEL 6,700 1,572 1,323 5,377 20%
RENTAL/LEASE 9,070 278 8,845 225 98%
REPAIRS/MAINTENANCE 500 15 - 500 0%
MISCELLANEOUS 25,000 9,522 8,535 16,465 34%
376,120$ 243,590$ 268,921$ 107,199$ 71%
OFFICE OF MAYOR
SALARIES 202,230$ 197,482$ 202,299$ (69)$ 100%
BENEFITS 49,670 48,114 49,668 2 100%
SUPPLIES 1,500 1,069 1,041 459 69%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,000 1,311 1,582 418 79%
COMMUNICATION 1,400 1,322 1,346 54 96%
TRAVEL 4,000 1,488 2,121 1,879 53%
RENTAL/LEASE 11,450 1,381 11,041 409 96%
MISCELLANEOUS 4,450 3,764 4,539 (89) 102%
276,700$ 255,933$ 273,638$ 3,062$ 99%
HUMAN RESOURCES
SALARIES 249,980$ 216,664$ 216,082$ 33,898$ 86%
OVERTIME - 43 369 (369) 0%
BENEFITS 79,390 74,675 77,909 1,481 98%
SUPPLIES 2,300 4,984 2,600 (300) 113%
SMALL EQUIPMENT 300 1,322 1,818 (1,518) 606%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 78,000 61,512 61,233 16,767 79%
COMMUNICATIONS 700 1,197 1,223 (523) 175%
TRAVEL 1,000 1,058 1,099 (99) 110%
RENTAL/LEASE 19,790 2,369 22,280 (2,490) 113%
REPAIR/MAINTENANCE 7,850 - 7,056 794 90%
MISCELLANEOUS 17,180 2,294 2,590 14,590 15%
456,490$ 366,117$ 394,259$ 62,231$ 86%
MUNICIPAL COURT
SALARIES 609,690$ 564,264$ 577,923$ 31,767$ 95%
OVERTIME 600 2,067 455 145 76%
BENEFITS 222,520 205,470 228,482 (5,962) 103%
SUPPLIES 9,200 7,809 22,136 (12,936) 241%
SMALL EQUIPMENT 900 326 4,098 (3,198) 455%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 90,000 76,126 87,836 2,164 98%
COMMUNICATIONS 2,700 2,800 2,791 (91) 103%
TRAVEL 4,500 3,188 1,861 2,639 41%
RENTAL/LEASE 39,780 735 39,812 (32) 100%
REPAIR/MAINTENANCE 1,250 1,024 4,448 (3,198) 356%
MISCELLANEOUS 34,900 15,001 17,730 17,170 51%
1,016,040$ 878,809$ 987,572$ 28,468$ 97%
EXPENDITURES - GENERAL FUND - BY DEPARTMENT IN DETAIL
CITY OF EDMONDS
6.4.a
Packet Pg. 107 Attachment: Complete Preliminary December 2017 Financial Report (Preliminary 2017 December Quarterly Financial Report)
14
Page 2 of 4
Title
2017 Amended
Budget
12/31/2016
Expenditures
12/31/2017
Expenditures
Amount
Remaining % Spent
CITY CLERK
SALARIES AND WAGES 326,390$ 330,742$ 327,277$ (887)$ 100%
OVERTIME 1,000 1,978 180 820 18%
BENEFITS 140,440 131,842 148,985 (8,545) 106%
SUPPLIES 10,240 6,846 4,674 5,566 46%
SMALL EQUIPMENT - 1,416 - - 0%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 28,310 27,789 29,695 (1,385) 105%
COMMUNICATIONS 50,000 19,750 30,158 19,842 60%
TRAVEL 1,000 38 368 632 37%
RENTAL/LEASE 50,810 16,326 51,414 (604) 101%
REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 28,510 28,384 31,111 (2,601) 109%
MISCELLANEOUS 4,000 6,509 8,329 (4,329) 208%
640,700$ 571,620$ 632,191$ 8,509$ 99%
FINANCE
SALARIES 696,560$ 875,019$ 686,431$ 10,129$ 99%
OVERTIME 4,500 1,810 - 4,500 0%
BENEFITS 235,920 290,051 237,293 (1,373) 101%
SUPPLIES 7,350 32,078 5,968 1,382 81%
SMALL EQUIPMENT 2,650 69,236 1,612 1,038 61%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 32,800 32,845 34,266 (1,466) 104%
COMMUNICATIONS 2,000 64,676 1,859 141 93%
TRAVEL 2,600 2,141 2,654 (54) 102%
RENTAL/LEASE 30,340 11,259 31,512 (1,172) 104%REPAIR/MAINTENANCE 38,500 152,028 40,372 (1,872) 105%MISCELLANEOUS 8,350 33,685 4,732 3,618 57%MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT - 29,213 - - 0%
1,061,570$ 1,594,043$ 1,046,698$ 14,872$ 99%
CITY ATTORNEY
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 818,780$ 724,604$ 802,103$ 16,677$ 98%
MISCELLANEOUS - 2,137 - - 0%
818,780$ 726,741$ 802,103$ 16,677$ 98%
NON-DEPARTMENTAL
SALARIES -$ -$ -$ -$ 0%
BENEFITS - UNEMPLOYMENT 25,000 3,090 2,975 22,025 12%
SUPPLIES 5,000 2,870 5,127 (127) 103%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 729,000 545,648 610,247 118,753 84%
EXCISE TAXES 6,500 4,662 4,820 1,680 74%
RENTAL/LEASE 10,480 3,600 10,480 (0) 100%
INSURANCE 609,550 538,732 616,495 (6,945) 101%
MISCELLANEOUS 69,000 69,889 67,274 1,726 97%
INTERGOVT SERVICES 9,935,280 9,859,189 9,872,485 62,795 99%
ECA LOAN PAYMENT 135,000 125,000 70,000 65,000 52%
INTERFUND SUBSIDIES 15 1,263,200 3,429,141 1,284,758 (21,558) 102%
GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND 164,790 699,636 170,160 (5,370) 103%
INTEREST ON LONG-TERM DEBT 39,580 48,058 27,979 11,601 71%
DEBT ISSUE COSTS - 5,327 - - 0%
FISCAL AGENT FEES 500 235 222 278 44%
12,992,880$ 15,335,077$ 12,743,022$ 249,858$ 98%
CITY OF EDMONDS
EXPENDITURES - GENERAL FUND - BY DEPARTMENT IN DETAIL
15 Difference between 2016 and 2017 is primarily due to final payment of Voted Public Safety Debt in February of 2016.
6.4.a
Packet Pg. 108 Attachment: Complete Preliminary December 2017 Financial Report (Preliminary 2017 December Quarterly Financial Report)
15
Page 3 of 4
Title
2017 Amended
Budget
12/31/2016
Expenditures
12/31/2017
Expenditures
Amount
Remaining % Spent
POLICE SERVICES
SALARIES 6,357,958$ 5,639,474$ 6,061,429$ 296,529$ 95%
OVERTIME 475,393 481,745 525,621 (50,228) 111%
HOLIDAY BUYBACK 226,420 195,915 201,476 24,944 89%
BENEFITS 2,347,255 2,215,297 2,395,050 (47,795) 102%
UNIFORMS 75,450 69,632 65,229 10,221 86%
SUPPLIES 88,500 79,499 76,129 12,371 86%
SMALL EQUIPMENT 34,151 34,269 29,846 4,305 87%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 117,670 90,895 91,026 26,644 77%
COMMUNICATIONS 27,210 33,453 37,861 (10,651) 139%
TRAVEL 17,310 17,492 22,867 (5,557) 132%
RENTAL/LEASE 842,630 590,296 839,264 3,366 100%
REPAIR/MAINTENANCE 15,120 9,172 7,277 7,843 48%
MISCELLANEOUS 46,350 28,275 33,886 12,464 73%
INTERGOVTL SERVICES 10,550 10,660 10,771 (221) 102%
MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT 87,263 - 91,135 (3,872) 104%
10,769,230$ 9,496,074$ 10,488,864$ 280,366$ 97%
COMMUNITY SERVICES/ECON DEV.
SALARIES 230,850$ 225,939$ 231,254$ (404)$ 100%
BENEFITS 69,230 67,272 71,152 (1,922) 103%
SUPPLIES 7,000 6,711 6,485 515 93%
SMALL EQUIPMENT 800 376 792 8 99%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 246,900 204,196 221,952 24,948 90%
COMMUNICATIONS 1,490 1,161 1,196 294 80%
TRAVEL 2,000 2,053 2,347 (347) 117%
RENTAL/LEASE 10,960 1,455 9,819 1,141 90%
REPAIR/MAINTENANCE 500 - - 500 0%
MISCELLANEOUS 7,000 2,778 4,797 2,203 69%
576,730$ 511,942$ 549,794$ 26,936$ 95%
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES/PLANNING
SALARIES 1,547,970$ 1,418,261$ 1,486,357$ 61,613$ 96%
OVERTIME 1,300 6,228 16,820 (15,520) 1294%
BENEFITS 568,060 522,042 544,072 23,988 96%
UNIFORMS 500 598 - 500 0%
SUPPLIES 16,100 17,413 13,482 2,618 84%
SMALL EQUIPMENT 6,000 8,844 6,473 (473) 108%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 755,567 304,112 535,639 219,928 71%
COMMUNICATIONS 8,700 7,279 8,285 415 95%
TRAVEL 4,750 7,734 7,190 (2,440) 151%
RENTAL/LEASE 147,580 21,455 148,629 (1,049) 101%
REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 6,800 8,973 2,489 4,311 37%
MISCELLANEOUS 54,060 35,907 54,081 (21) 100%
MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT - 27,449 - - 0%
3,117,387$ 2,386,294$ 2,823,518$ 293,869$ 91%
ENGINEERING
SALARIES 1,479,070$ 1,303,402$ 1,416,750$ 62,320$ 96%
OVERTIME 5,000 4,777 760 4,240 15%
BENEFITS 572,030 519,524 593,758 (21,728) 104%
UNIFORMS 360 926 - 360 0%
SUPPLIES - 79 - - 0%
SMALL EQUIPMENT 3,930 2,072 3,383 547 86%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 48,080 532,790 40,186 7,894 84%
COMMUNICATIONS 14,700 11,956 13,044 1,656 89%
TRAVEL 600 1,311 45 555 8%
RENTAL/LEASE 93,250 24,194 90,033 3,217 97%
REPAIR/MAINTENANCE 2,600 346 587 2,013 23%
MISCELLANEOUS 23,000 22,700 17,733 5,267 77%
2,242,620$ 2,424,076$ 2,176,279$ 66,341$ 97%
CITY OF EDMONDS
EXPENDITURES - GENERAL FUND - BY DEPARTMENT IN DETAIL
6.4.a
Packet Pg. 109 Attachment: Complete Preliminary December 2017 Financial Report (Preliminary 2017 December Quarterly Financial Report)
16
Page 4 of 4
Title
2017 Amended
Budget
12/31/2016
Expenditures
12/31/2017
Expenditures
Amount
Remaining % Spent
PARKS & RECREATION
SALARIES 2,003,255$ 1,749,408$ 1,868,199$ 135,056$ 93%
OVERTIME 10,000 16,106 23,659 (13,659) 237%
BENEFITS 728,320 667,163 744,418 (16,098) 102%
UNIFORMS 5,800 5,347 4,834 966 83%
SUPPLIES 117,390 128,620 122,075 (4,685) 104%
SMALL EQUIPMENT 3,250 11,430 15,464 (12,214) 476%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 576,240 441,375 434,952 141,288 75%
COMMUNICATIONS 29,920 26,217 27,737 2,183 93%
TRAVEL 4,470 2,357 5,819 (1,349) 130%
RENTAL/LEASE 283,560 201,967 285,772 (2,212) 101%
PUBLIC UTILITY 175,000 212,117 215,664 (40,664) 123%
REPAIR/MAINTENANCE 37,700 45,297 37,074 626 98%
MISCELLANEOUS 92,610 62,473 71,202 21,408 77%
MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT 47,000 - - 47,000 0%
INTERGOVTL SERVICES 70,700 78,758 27,876 42,824 39%
4,185,215$ 3,648,633$ 3,884,744$ 300,471$ 93%
PUBLIC WORKS
SALARIES 270,330$ 261,802$ 273,428$ (3,098)$ 101%
OVERTIME 200 - - 200 0%
BENEFITS 83,880 80,718 87,663 (3,783) 105%
SUPPLIES 9,600 4,718 4,432 5,168 46%
SMALL EQUIPMENT 1,000 108 - 1,000 0%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 200 87 100 100 50%
COMMUNICATIONS 1,350 696 702 648 52%
TRAVEL 500 828 656 (156) 131%
RENTAL/LEASE 93,990 6,321 92,761 1,229 99%
PUBLIC UTILITY 2,800 2,479 2,535 265 91%
REPAIR/MAINTENANCE 1,000 - 109 891 11%
MISCELLANEOUS 5,900 454 908 4,992 15%
470,750$ 358,210$ 463,295$ 7,455$ 98%
FACILITIES MAINTENANCE
SALARIES 695,650 657,227 736,729 (41,079) 106%
OVERTIME 7,500 7,220 8,878 (1,378) 118%
BENEFITS 295,620 269,925 311,341 (15,721) 105%
UNIFORMS 3,000 3,889 4,644 (1,644) 155%
SUPPLIES 102,829 84,849 105,453 (2,624) 103%
SMALL EQUIPMENT 3,000 6,402 11,478 (8,478) 383%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 18,246 3,595 14,603 3,643 80%
COMMUNICATIONS 16,000 16,657 17,953 (1,953) 112%
TRAVEL 1,000 12 162 838 16%
RENTAL/LEASE 64,360 53,175 60,133 4,227 93%
PUBLIC UTILITY 280,000 275,306 294,894 (14,894) 105%
REPAIR/MAINTENANCE 84,500 77,076 111,238 (26,738) 132%
MISCELLANEOUS 5,000 5,039 4,470 530 89%
BUILDINGS 18,323 - - 18,323 0%
1,595,028$ 1,460,372$ 1,681,976$ (86,948)$ 105%
TOTAL GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES 40,596,240$ 40,257,530$ 39,216,873$ 1,379,367$ 97%
CITY OF EDMONDS
EXPENDITURES - GENERAL FUND - BY DEPARTMENT IN DETAIL
6.4.a
Packet Pg. 110 Attachment: Complete Preliminary December 2017 Financial Report (Preliminary 2017 December Quarterly Financial Report)
17
General Fund
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals %
January 1,848,996$ 1,848,996$ 2,222,449$ 20.20%
February 4,491,526 2,642,529 4,590,134 2.20%
March 6,716,556 2,225,031 7,111,840 5.89%
April 10,361,498 3,644,941 10,413,847 0.51%
May 17,663,331 7,301,833 18,087,809 2.40%
June 19,617,793 1,954,462 20,280,036 3.38%
July 21,581,521 1,963,728 22,295,216 3.31%
August 23,785,565 2,204,044 24,441,266 2.76%
September 25,709,993 1,924,428 26,771,944 4.13%
October 28,469,012 2,759,019 29,893,590 5.00%
November 35,868,690 7,399,678 37,320,136 4.05%
December 37,886,876 2,018,186 39,552,609 4.40%
Real Estate Excise Tax 1 & 2
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals %
January 207,208$ 207,208$ 214,967$ 3.74%
February 377,258 170,050 425,156 12.70%
March 561,933 184,674 517,163 -7.97%
April 738,924 176,991 759,746 2.82%
May 921,191 182,267 1,057,416 14.79%
June 1,156,829 235,638 1,336,234 15.51%
July 1,491,329 334,500 1,651,931 10.77%
August 1,747,148 255,819 1,967,363 12.60%
September 1,998,654 251,505 2,268,591 13.51%
October 2,216,068 217,414 2,563,627 15.68%
November 2,456,999 240,931 2,782,543 13.25%
December 2,600,000 143,001 2,983,643 14.76%
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
2017
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Revenue Summary-General Fund
2017
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Revenue Summary-Real Estate Excise Tax
0
5,000,000
10,000,000
15,000,000
20,000,000
25,000,000
30,000,000
35,000,000
40,000,000
45,000,000
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
General Fund
Current Year Budget Prior Year
0
500,000
1,000,000
1,500,000
2,000,000
2,500,000
3,000,000
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Real Estate Excise Tax 1 & 2
Current Year Budget Prior Year
6.4.a
Packet Pg. 111 Attachment: Complete Preliminary December 2017 Financial Report (Preliminary 2017 December Quarterly Financial Report)
18
Wholesale Trade,
$324,280
Communications,
$226,475
Clothing and
Accessories, $228,700
Accommodation,
$47,432
Construction Trade,
$1,297,738
Health & Personal Care,
$228,080
Automotive Repair,
$179,602 Amusement &
Recreation, $85,625
Business Services,
$609,233
Gasoline, $35,887
Retail Food Stores,
$271,195
Retail Automotive,
$1,819,035
Manufacturing, $95,863Eating & Drinking,
$942,912
Others, $48,021
Misc Retail, $955,035
Sales Tax Analysis By Category
Current Period: December 2017
Year-to-Date
Total $7,395,114
($50,000)$0 $50,000 $100,000 $150,000 $200,000 $250,000 $300,000 $350,000 $400,000 $450,000 $500,000
Communications
Manufacturing
Others
Accommodation
Gasoline
Retail Food Stores
Automotive Repair
Clothing and Accessories
Health & Personal Care
Amusement & Recreation
Business Services
Wholesale Trade
Retail Automotive
Eating & Drinking
Misc Retail
Construction Trade
Total
($25,321)
($18,537)
($11,802)
($770)
$1,420
$4,884
$5,974
$9,531
$10,706
$11,050
$21,124
$27,010
$53,940
$65,927
$97,174
$237,679
$489,991
Change in Sales Tax Revenue:
December 2017 compared to
December 2016
6.4.a
Packet Pg. 112 Attachment: Complete Preliminary December 2017 Financial Report (Preliminary 2017 December Quarterly Financial Report)
19
Sales and Use Tax
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals %
January 528,142$ 528,142$ 554,719$ 5.03%
February 1,179,855 651,712 1,307,546 10.82%
March 1,679,874 500,020 1,829,850 8.93%
April 2,159,477 479,603 2,327,446 7.78%
May 2,755,486 596,009 2,970,761 7.81%
June 3,293,571 538,085 3,524,666 7.02%
July 3,847,001 553,430 4,140,510 7.63%
August 4,458,173 611,171 4,805,603 7.79%
September 5,050,960 592,787 5,439,449 7.69%
October 5,666,829 615,869 6,091,098 7.49%
November 6,303,607 636,779 6,800,816 7.89%
December 6,875,000 571,393 7,395,114 7.57%
Gas Utility Tax
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals %
January 86,887$ 86,887$ 93,550$ 7.67%
February 183,529 96,642 203,652 10.96%
March 260,361 76,832 294,027 12.93%
April 328,823 68,462 372,490 13.28%
May 381,147 52,324 429,203 12.61%
June 416,950 35,802 475,324 14.00%
July 446,516 29,566 504,267 12.93%
August 469,952 23,437 528,405 12.44%
September 491,313 21,360 550,214 11.99%
October 515,645 24,332 574,774 11.47%
November 552,451 36,806 617,837 11.84%
December 608,000 55,549 686,531 12.92%
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
2017
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Revenue Summary-Sales and Use Tax
2017
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Revenue Summary-Gas Utility Tax
0
1,000,000
2,000,000
3,000,000
4,000,000
5,000,000
6,000,000
7,000,000
8,000,000
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Sales and Use Tax
Current Year Budget Prior Year
0
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
700,000
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Gas Utility Tax
Current Year Budget Prior Year
6.4.a
Packet Pg. 113 Attachment: Complete Preliminary December 2017 Financial Report (Preliminary 2017 December Quarterly Financial Report)
20
Telephone Utility Tax
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals %
January 114,426$ 114,426$ 105,424$ -7.87%
February 223,803 109,377 199,068 -11.05%
March 330,274 106,471 290,145 -12.15%
April 436,772 106,497 403,189 -7.69%
May 549,330 112,558 492,059 -10.43%
June 651,204 101,874 582,703 -10.52%
July 754,077 102,873 650,709 -13.71%
August 855,646 101,570 736,483 -13.93%
September 961,054 105,407 821,864 -14.48%
October 1,062,454 101,400 907,617 -14.57%
November 1,159,179 96,725 993,334 -14.31%
December 1,263,200 104,021 1,076,870 -14.75%
Electric Utility Tax
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals %
January 171,830$ 171,830$ 175,773$ 2.29%
February 347,448 175,618 382,822 10.18%
March 515,770 168,322 549,954 6.63%
April 678,100 162,330 729,784 7.62%
May 824,207 146,107 863,230 4.73%
June 937,922 113,715 991,566 5.72%
July 1,049,475 111,553 1,107,717 5.55%
August 1,155,197 105,722 1,217,184 5.37%
September 1,260,458 105,261 1,327,189 5.29%
October 1,368,262 107,804 1,432,952 4.73%
November 1,486,788 118,526 1,553,264 4.47%
December 1,604,000 117,212 1,693,313 5.57%
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
2017
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Revenue Summary-Telephone Utility Tax
2017
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Revenue Summary-Electric Utility Tax
0
200,000
400,000
600,000
800,000
1,000,000
1,200,000
1,400,000
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Telephone Utility Tax
Current Year Budget Prior Year
0
200,000
400,000
600,000
800,000
1,000,000
1,200,000
1,400,000
1,600,000
1,800,000
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Electric Utility Tax
Current Year Budget Prior Year
6.4.a
Packet Pg. 114 Attachment: Complete Preliminary December 2017 Financial Report (Preliminary 2017 December Quarterly Financial Report)
21
Meter Water Sales
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals %
January 573,159$ 573,159$ 599,648$ 4.62%
February 966,145 392,986 1,027,975 6.40%
March 1,529,375 563,229 1,658,808 8.46%
April 1,906,725 377,350 2,057,951 7.93%
May 2,464,794 558,070 2,660,519 7.94%
June 2,900,426 435,631 3,101,835 6.94%
July 3,585,922 685,496 3,777,591 5.35%
August 4,167,341 581,419 4,420,673 6.08%
September 4,962,652 795,311 5,351,996 7.85%
October 5,517,073 554,421 6,008,717 8.91%
November 6,167,530 650,457 6,760,633 9.62%
December 6,572,750 405,220 7,199,319 9.53%
Storm Water Sales
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals %
January 245,291$ 245,291$ 261,646$ 2.29%
February 773,850 528,559 828,655 10.18%
March 1,018,952 245,102 1,089,708 6.63%
April 1,236,230 217,279 1,322,203 7.62%
May 1,481,659 245,428 1,583,130 4.73%
June 1,699,683 218,024 1,815,097 5.72%
July 1,946,434 246,751 2,077,219 6.72%
August 2,474,151 527,717 2,643,230 6.83%
September 2,718,865 244,714 2,904,264 6.82%
October 2,936,691 217,826 3,135,355 6.76%
November 3,181,934 245,242 3,397,293 6.77%
December 3,400,000 218,066 3,628,556 6.72%
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
2017
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Revenue Summary-Meter Water Sales
2017
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Revenue Summary-Storm Water Sales
0
1,000,000
2,000,000
3,000,000
4,000,000
5,000,000
6,000,000
7,000,000
8,000,000
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Meter Water Sales
Current Year Budget Prior Year
0
500,000
1,000,000
1,500,000
2,000,000
2,500,000
3,000,000
3,500,000
4,000,000
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Storm Water Sales
Current Year Budget Prior Year
6.4.a
Packet Pg. 115 Attachment: Complete Preliminary December 2017 Financial Report (Preliminary 2017 December Quarterly Financial Report)
22
Unmeter Sewer Sales
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals %
January 572,309$ 572,309$ 623,336$ 8.92%
February 1,034,805 462,496 1,135,356 9.72%
March 1,603,135 568,330 1,767,521 10.25%
April 2,067,863 464,728 2,277,537 10.14%
May 2,638,929 571,065 2,905,981 10.12%
June 3,109,116 470,187 3,422,308 10.07%
July 3,696,739 587,623 4,070,136 10.10%
August 4,167,756 471,017 4,584,464 10.00%
September 4,763,468 595,712 5,263,696 10.50%
October 5,237,994 474,526 5,784,247 10.43%
November 5,818,870 580,876 6,438,230 10.64%
December 6,291,410 472,540 6,952,698 10.51%
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Revenue Summary-Unmeter Sewer Sales
2017
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
0
1,000,000
2,000,000
3,000,000
4,000,000
5,000,000
6,000,000
7,000,000
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Unmeter Sewer Sales
Current Year Budget Prior Year
6.4.a
Packet Pg. 116 Attachment: Complete Preliminary December 2017 Financial Report (Preliminary 2017 December Quarterly Financial Report)
23
General Fund
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals %
January 4,467,612$ 4,467,612$ 4,856,792$ 8.71%
February 7,134,942 2,667,330 7,118,110 -0.24%
March 10,285,235 3,150,292 11,124,815 8.16%
April 14,185,922 3,900,687 13,496,549 -4.86%
May 16,340,655 2,154,733 15,723,883 -3.77%
June 20,073,206 3,732,551 19,674,034 -1.99%
July 23,249,149 3,175,943 22,850,406 -1.72%
August 27,224,108 3,974,958 25,860,948 -5.01%
September 30,377,931 3,153,823 28,147,013 -7.34%
October 32,963,896 2,585,965 32,226,466 -2.24%
November 36,620,525 3,656,629 36,205,378 -1.13%
December 40,596,240 3,975,715 39,216,874 -3.40%
Non-Departmental
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals %
January 2,193,629$ 2,193,629$ 2,867,736$ 30.73%
February 2,756,887 563,258 2,992,431 8.54%
March 3,753,002 996,115 4,967,917 32.37%
April 5,344,648 1,591,646 5,263,262 -1.52%
May 5,490,628 145,980 5,385,911 -1.91%
June 6,937,376 1,446,749 7,243,467 4.41%
July 7,805,656 868,280 8,185,101 4.86%
August 9,275,338 1,469,681 8,967,984 -3.31%
September 10,198,248 922,910 9,058,597 -11.17%
October 10,597,245 398,997 10,640,517 0.41%
November 11,702,690 1,105,445 12,074,146 3.17%
December 12,992,880 1,290,190 12,743,022 -1.92%
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
2017
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report-General Fund
2017
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report-Non-Departmental
0
5,000,000
10,000,000
15,000,000
20,000,000
25,000,000
30,000,000
35,000,000
40,000,000
45,000,000
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
General Fund
Current Year Budget Prior Year
0
2,000,000
4,000,000
6,000,000
8,000,000
10,000,000
12,000,000
14,000,000
16,000,000
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Non-Departmental
Current Year Budget Prior Year
6.4.a
Packet Pg. 117 Attachment: Complete Preliminary December 2017 Financial Report (Preliminary 2017 December Quarterly Financial Report)
24
City Council
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals %
January 24,382$ 24,382$ 22,742$ -6.73%
February 52,318 27,936 44,954 -14.07%
March 83,798 31,480 70,026 -16.43%
April 111,661 27,864 93,544 -16.23%
May 142,110 30,449 118,441 -16.66%
June 179,407 37,297 147,770 -17.63%
July 211,248 31,841 172,790 -18.21%
August 243,636 32,388 197,804 -18.81%
September 280,710 37,075 215,030 -23.40%
October 307,316 26,606 233,786 -23.93%
November 340,142 32,826 252,877 -25.66%
December 376,120 35,978 268,921 -28.50%
Office of Mayor
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals %
January 23,100$ 23,100$ 22,135$ -4.18%
February 46,663 23,563 46,116 -1.17%
March 69,540 22,877 68,939 -0.87%
April 92,124 22,584 91,090 -1.12%
May 114,857 22,733 113,581 -1.11%
June 137,580 22,723 135,664 -1.39%
July 160,958 23,378 158,405 -1.59%
August 184,229 23,271 182,492 -0.94%
September 207,064 22,834 204,943 -1.02%
October 230,074 23,010 227,415 -1.16%
November 252,731 22,657 249,397 -1.32%
December 276,700 23,969 273,638 -1.11%
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
2017
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report-City Council
2017
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report-Office of Mayor
0
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
300,000
350,000
400,000
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
City Council
Current Year Budget Prior Year
0.00
50,000.00
100,000.00
150,000.00
200,000.00
250,000.00
300,000.00
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Office of Mayor
Current Year Budget Prior Year
6.4.a
Packet Pg. 118 Attachment: Complete Preliminary December 2017 Financial Report (Preliminary 2017 December Quarterly Financial Report)
25
Human Resources
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals %
January 33,336$ 33,336$ 35,109$ 5.32%
February 71,046 37,709 63,054 -11.25%
March 115,092 44,047 93,670 -18.61%
April 148,861 33,769 122,632 -17.62%
May 188,582 39,721 152,171 -19.31%
June 226,982 38,400 177,689 -21.72%
July 266,054 39,073 215,405 -19.04%
August 302,670 36,616 245,681 -18.83%
September 336,201 33,531 280,584 -16.54%
October 375,053 38,852 309,144 -17.57%
November 408,108 33,055 342,379 -16.11%
December 456,490 48,382 394,259 -13.63%
Municipal Court
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals %
January 76,169$ 76,169$ 76,438$ 0.35%
February 160,499 84,331 170,699 6.35%
March 247,877 87,378 249,970 0.84%
April 328,604 80,727 330,859 0.69%
May 410,974 82,370 407,638 -0.81%
June 493,268 82,293 488,007 -1.07%
July 576,475 83,207 563,868 -2.19%
August 663,963 87,488 640,933 -3.47%
September 749,628 85,665 719,187 -4.06%
October 839,421 89,793 798,191 -4.91%
November 926,818 87,397 878,792 -5.18%
December 1,016,040 89,222 987,572 -2.80%
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
2017
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report-Human Resources
2017
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report-Municipal Court
0
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
300,000
350,000
400,000
450,000
500,000
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Human Resources
Current Year Budget Prior Year
0
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
700,000
800,000
900,000
1,000,000
1,100,000
1,200,000
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Municipal Court
Current Year Budget Prior Year
6.4.a
Packet Pg. 119 Attachment: Complete Preliminary December 2017 Financial Report (Preliminary 2017 December Quarterly Financial Report)
26
Community Services/Economic Development
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals %
January 32,279$ 32,279$ 41,399$ 28.25%
February 75,682 43,404 82,958 9.61%
March 119,244 43,562 124,227 4.18%
April 179,524 60,280 168,847 -5.95%
May 220,780 41,257 213,705 -3.20%
June 263,589 42,809 252,311 -4.28%
July 310,443 46,854 292,103 -5.91%
August 359,638 49,195 335,997 -6.57%
September 408,107 48,469 379,173 -7.09%
October 456,589 48,482 430,400 -5.74%
November 509,519 52,930 481,259 -5.55%
December 576,730 67,211 549,794 -4.67%
City Clerk
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals %
January 53,784$ 53,784$ 63,151$ 17.42%
February 104,286 50,502 115,829 11.07%
March 157,201 52,915 165,932 5.55%
April 207,322 50,121 232,085 11.94%
May 256,511 49,189 282,468 10.12%
June 307,559 51,048 328,184 6.71%
July 359,433 51,874 381,124 6.03%
August 413,315 53,882 428,048 3.56%
September 466,515 53,200 478,264 2.52%
October 530,442 63,926 523,808 -1.25%
November 586,438 55,996 579,731 -1.14%
December 640,700 54,262 632,191 -1.33%
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
2017
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report-Community Services/Economic Development
2017
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report-City Clerk
0
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Community Services/Economic Development
Current Year Budget Prior Year
0
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
700,000
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
City Clerk
Current Year Budget Prior Year
6.4.a
Packet Pg. 120 Attachment: Complete Preliminary December 2017 Financial Report (Preliminary 2017 December Quarterly Financial Report)
27
Technology Rental Fund
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals %
January 92,520$ 92,520$ 68,612$ -25.84%
February 184,699 92,179 177,236 -4.04%
March 246,797 62,098 225,779 -8.52%
April 303,091 56,294 277,784 -8.35%
May 351,294 48,204 327,297 -6.83%
June 402,836 51,541 373,016 -7.40%
July 470,720 67,884 428,076 -9.06%
August 548,835 78,115 483,955 -11.82%
September 622,311 73,476 544,855 -12.45%
October 685,986 63,675 590,947 -13.85%
November 766,981 80,995 650,430 -15.20%
December 925,130 158,149 714,607 -22.76%
Finance
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals %
January 103,377$ 103,377$ 122,581$ 18.58%
February 192,121 88,744 199,380 3.78%
March 274,955 82,833 281,459 2.37%
April 365,390 90,435 364,229 -0.32%
May 447,590 82,201 453,448 1.31%
June 528,981 81,391 543,908 2.82%
July 610,748 81,767 629,442 3.06%
August 695,097 84,349 709,795 2.11%
September 790,122 95,024 792,011 0.24%
October 881,200 91,078 886,813 0.64%
November 966,964 85,764 966,915 -0.01%
December 1,061,570 94,606 1,046,698 -1.40%
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
2017
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report-Technology Rental Fund
2017
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report-Finance
Prior Year amounts are from the Information Services Budget
0
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
700,000
800,000
900,000
1,000,000
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Technology Rental Fund
Current Year Budget Prior Year
0
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
700,000
800,000
900,000
1,000,000
1,100,000
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Finance
Current Year Budget Prior Year
6.4.a
Packet Pg. 121 Attachment: Complete Preliminary December 2017 Financial Report (Preliminary 2017 December Quarterly Financial Report)
28
City Attorney
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals %
January 68,232$ 68,232$ 44,346$ -35.01%
February 136,463 68,232 133,495 -2.18%
March 204,695 68,232 199,483 -2.55%
April 272,927 68,232 265,386 -2.76%
May 341,158 68,232 331,290 -2.89%
June 409,390 68,232 397,194 -2.98%
July 477,621 68,232 441,539 -7.55%
August 545,853 68,232 509,955 -6.58%
September 614,085 68,232 598,879 -2.48%
October 682,316 68,232 664,783 -2.57%
November 750,548 68,232 734,024 -2.20%
December 818,780 68,232 802,103 -2.04%
Police
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals %
January 849,006$ 849,006$ 780,892$ -8.02%
February 1,700,656 851,650 1,625,589 -4.41%
March 2,563,367 862,710 2,399,391 -6.40%
April 3,416,290 852,923 3,219,838 -5.75%
May 4,264,113 847,823 4,002,270 -6.14%
June 5,169,535 905,422 4,792,427 -7.29%
July 6,026,464 856,930 5,702,618 -5.37%
August 6,896,555 870,091 6,479,161 -6.05%
September 7,758,425 861,870 7,317,041 -5.69%
October 8,657,029 898,604 8,485,904 -1.98%
November 9,859,567 1,202,538 9,587,220 -2.76%
December 10,769,230 909,663 10,488,864 -2.60%
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
2017
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report-City Attorney
2017
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report-Police
0
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
700,000
800,000
900,000
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
City Attorney
Current Year Budget Prior Year
0
1,000,000
2,000,000
3,000,000
4,000,000
5,000,000
6,000,000
7,000,000
8,000,000
9,000,000
10,000,000
11,000,000
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Police
Current Year Budget Prior Year
6.4.a
Packet Pg. 122 Attachment: Complete Preliminary December 2017 Financial Report (Preliminary 2017 December Quarterly Financial Report)
29
Development Services
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals %
January 235,285$ 235,285$ 177,820$ -24.42%
February 480,958 245,673 416,189 -13.47%
March 751,100 270,142 613,958 -18.26%
April 991,519 240,419 831,603 -16.13%
May 1,250,878 259,359 1,076,107 -13.97%
June 1,497,579 246,701 1,291,724 -13.75%
July 1,755,943 258,364 1,503,700 -14.37%
August 2,029,313 273,370 1,743,617 -14.08%
September 2,287,754 258,442 1,958,291 -14.40%
October 2,569,912 282,157 2,204,563 -14.22%
November 2,826,227 256,316 2,565,669 -9.22%
December 3,117,387 291,160 2,823,518 -9.43%
Parks & Recreation
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals %
January 278,773$ 278,773$ 260,128$ -6.69%
February 568,715 289,942 525,411 -7.61%
March 874,135 305,420 828,782 -5.19%
April 1,183,309 309,174 1,110,332 -6.17%
May 1,521,495 338,186 1,417,439 -6.84%
June 1,857,466 335,971 1,763,105 -5.08%
July 2,332,300 474,834 2,123,498 -8.95%
August 2,844,103 511,803 2,595,035 -8.76%
September 3,205,638 361,535 2,960,855 -7.64%
October 3,531,920 326,282 3,263,586 -7.60%
November 3,816,917 284,998 3,545,043 -7.12%
December 4,185,215 368,298 3,884,745 -7.18%
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
2017
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report-Development Services
2017
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report-Parks & Recreation
-100,000
200,000
500,000
800,000
1,100,000
1,400,000
1,700,000
2,000,000
2,300,000
2,600,000
2,900,000
3,200,000
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Development Services
Current Year Budget Prior Year
0
500,000
1,000,000
1,500,000
2,000,000
2,500,000
3,000,000
3,500,000
4,000,000
4,500,000
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Parks & Recreation
Current Year Budget Prior Year
6.4.a
Packet Pg. 123 Attachment: Complete Preliminary December 2017 Financial Report (Preliminary 2017 December Quarterly Financial Report)
30
Public Works
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals %
January 38,606$ 38,606$ 37,599$ -2.61%
February 77,835 39,229 79,084 1.61%
March 117,100 39,265 117,357 0.22%
April 156,588 39,488 155,173 -0.90%
May 196,390 39,802 193,212 -1.62%
June 235,491 39,101 232,019 -1.47%
July 275,204 39,712 270,583 -1.68%
August 314,352 39,148 309,099 -1.67%
September 352,464 38,113 346,985 -1.55%
October 393,232 40,768 384,903 -2.12%
November 429,298 36,066 422,823 -1.51%
December 470,750 41,452 463,295 -1.58%
Facilities Maintenance
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals %
January 127,054$ 127,054$ 128,273$ 0.96%
February 257,275 130,221 264,009 2.62%
March 393,296 136,021 404,318 2.80%
April 523,097 129,801 528,660 1.06%
May 653,776 130,679 672,777 2.91%
June 769,798 116,022 792,861 3.00%
July 920,705 150,908 933,921 1.44%
August 1,041,207 120,502 1,062,692 2.06%
September 1,179,252 138,045 1,209,713 2.58%
October 1,302,136 122,884 1,365,309 4.85%
November 1,442,204 140,068 1,527,302 5.90%
December 1,595,028 152,824 1,681,976 5.45%
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
2017
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report-Public Works
2017
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report-Facilities Maintenance
0
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
300,000
350,000
400,000
450,000
500,000
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Public Works
Current Year Budget Prior Year
0
200,000
400,000
600,000
800,000
1,000,000
1,200,000
1,400,000
1,600,000
1,800,000
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Facilities Maintenance
Current Year Budget Prior Year
6.4.a
Packet Pg. 124 Attachment: Complete Preliminary December 2017 Financial Report (Preliminary 2017 December Quarterly Financial Report)
31
Engineering
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals %
January 173,221$ 173,221$ 176,444$ 1.86%
February 343,088 169,868 358,913 4.61%
March 528,927 185,839 539,386 1.98%
April 717,207 188,280 719,010 0.25%
May 896,313 179,105 903,426 0.79%
June 1,086,359 190,047 1,087,704 0.12%
July 1,266,754 180,394 1,276,308 0.75%
August 1,462,189 195,435 1,452,654 -0.65%
September 1,650,292 188,104 1,627,459 -1.38%
October 1,848,198 197,905 1,807,345 -2.21%
November 2,031,168 182,970 1,997,799 -1.64%
December 2,242,620 211,452 2,176,279 -2.96%
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report-Engineering
2017
0
250,000
500,000
750,000
1,000,000
1,250,000
1,500,000
1,750,000
2,000,000
2,250,000
2,500,000
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Engineering
Current Year Budget Prior Year
6.4.a
Packet Pg. 125 Attachment: Complete Preliminary December 2017 Financial Report (Preliminary 2017 December Quarterly Financial Report)
32
INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO SUMMARY
Years
Agency/Investment Purchase to Par Market Maturity Coupon
Issuer Type Price Maturity Value Value Date Rate
FFCB Bonds 995,820 0.55 1,000,000 995,169 07/18/18 0.75%
FFCB Bonds 2,010,790 0.99 2,000,000 1,992,306 12/28/18 1.42%
FFCB Bonds 2,000,000 1.07 2,000,000 1,987,220 01/25/19 1.23%
FICO Bonds 1,009,725 1.32 1,035,000 1,009,210 04/25/19 1.42%
FNMA Bonds 999,750 1.45 1,000,000 992,359 06/13/19 1.40%
FHLB Bonds 1,000,400 1.47 1,000,000 991,186 06/20/19 1.40%
FHLMC Bonds 995,970 1.75 1,000,000 988,067 10/02/19 1.25%
FNMA Bonds 1,994,310 1.82 2,000,000 1,973,670 10/28/19 1.35%
FNMA Bonds 997,300 2.25 1,000,000 984,766 03/30/20 1.38%
FHLB Bonds 2,003,780 2.25 2,000,000 1,970,068 03/30/20 1.45%
FNMA Bonds 2,000,000 2.25 2,000,000 1,976,584 03/30/20 1.65%
FHLMC Bonds 2,003,868 2.33 2,000,000 1,969,928 04/28/20 1.35%
FNMA Bonds 1,000,000 2.50 1,000,000 974,965 06/30/20 1.38%
FNMA Bonds 1,000,000 2.50 1,000,000 974,965 06/30/20 1.38%
FHLB Bonds 3,000,000 2.53 3,000,000 2,934,537 07/13/20 1.20%
RFCS Bonds 1,999,698 2.54 2,120,000 2,009,794 07/15/20 1.60%
FHLB Bonds 2,000,000 2.58 2,000,000 1,983,872 07/30/20 1.75%
FNMA Bonds 1,000,000 2.66 1,000,000 980,497 08/28/20 1.40%
FNMA Bonds 1,000,000 2.66 1,000,000 980,497 08/28/20 1.40%
FHLMC Bonds 999,500 3.00 1,000,000 986,212 12/30/20 1.75%
FNMA Bonds 2,005,474 3.05 2,000,000 1,938,578 01/19/21 1.50%
FM Bonds 2,000,000 3.25 2,000,000 1,966,674 04/01/21 1.87%
FHLB Bonds 2,000,000 3.48 2,000,000 1,997,592 06/22/21 2.18%
FHLMC Bonds 2,000,000 3.91 2,000,000 1,985,686 11/26/21 2.13%
FHLMC Bonds 999,400 4.00 1,000,000 984,145 12/30/21 2.00%
FHLMC Bonds 1,000,000 4.16 1,000,000 993,671 02/25/22 2.15%
TOTAL SECURITIES 40,015,786 2.4 40,155,000 39,522,218
Washington State Local Gov't Investment Pool 6,706,292 6,706,292 Demand 1.26%
Snohomish County Local Gov't Investment Pool 10,830,115 10,830,115 Demand 1.33%
TOTAL PORTFOLIO 57,691,407$ 57,058,624$
As of December 31, 2017
City of Edmonds Investment Portfolio Detail
RFCS, 5%
FHLMC,
20%
FFCB, 12%
FICO, 3%FHLB, 25%
FM, 5%
FNMA, 30%
Issuer Diversification
Checking,
$3.7 , 6%
State LGIP,
$6.7 , 11%
County
LGIP,
$10.8 , 18%Bonds,
$40.2 , 65%
Cash and Investment Balances
(in $ Millions)
6.4.a
Packet Pg. 126 Attachment: Complete Preliminary December 2017 Financial Report (Preliminary 2017 December Quarterly Financial Report)
33
INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO SUMMARY
$57,334 $74,830
$163,214
$335,926
$423,816
$653,690
$-
$100,000
$200,000
$300,000
$400,000
$500,000
$600,000
$700,000
$800,000
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Annual Interest Income
0.0%0.1%0.2%0.3%0.4%0.5%0.6%0.7%0.8%0.9%1.0%1.1%1.2%1.3%1.4%1.5%1.6%1.7%
Jan March May July September November
Edmonds Rate of Return Compared to Benchmark (Rolling 12 months)
6 Month Treasury Rate (Benchmark)City Blended Rate
0.00%
0.50%
1.00%
1.50%
2.00%
2.50%
$-
$2,000,000
$4,000,000
$6,000,000
$8,000,000
$10,000,000
$12,000,000
0-6 Mo 6-12 Mo 12-18 Mo 18-24 Mo 24-30 Mo 30-36 Mo 36-42 Mo 42-48 Mo 48-54 Mo 54-60 Mo
Maturity Distribution and Rate of Return
6.4.a
Packet Pg. 127 Attachment: Complete Preliminary December 2017 Financial Report (Preliminary 2017 December Quarterly Financial Report)
34
GENERAL FUND OVERVIEW
12/31/2016 9/30/2017 12/31/2017 Q4 YTD
001-General Fund 9,841,719$ 8,466,650$ 10,177,454$ 1,710,805$ 335,736$
009-Leoff-Medical Ins. Reserve 540,254 383,856 413,387 29,531 (126,866)
011-Risk Management Fund 963,026 895,103 899,272 4,169 (63,754)
012-Contingency Reserve Fund 5,367,841 5,424,137 5,449,264 25,127 81,422
014-Historic Preservation Gift Fund 7,647 7,760 7,361 (399) (286)
016-Building Maintenance 98,436 209,877 157,602 (52,275) 59,166
Total General Fund & Subfunds 16,818,922$ 15,387,382$ 17,104,340$ 1,716,958$ 285,418$
GENERAL FUND
& SUBFUNDS
FUND BALANCES CHANGE IN FUND BALANCES
---- ACTUAL -------- ACTUAL ----
$16.82
$15.39 $17.10
-
4
8
12
16
20
Dec 2016 Sept 2017 Dec 2017MillionsGeneralFund & Subfunds
*Please note that these revenues and expenses occur within annual cycles.
This Interim Report is not adjusted for accruals or those annual cycles.
The ending fund balances for 2017 are preliminary, these will be updated
after the completion of the 2017 Financial Statements.
6.4.a
Packet Pg. 128 Attachment: Complete Preliminary December 2017 Financial Report (Preliminary 2017 December Quarterly Financial Report)
35
GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS OVERVIEW
12/31/2016 9/30/2017 12/31/2017 Q4 YTD
General Fund & Subfunds 16,818,922$ 15,387,382$ 17,104,340$ 1,716,958$ 285,418$
Special Revenue 8,664,435 10,178,420 9,270,064 (908,356) 605,630
Debt Service 20,262 3,812 3,812 0 (16,450)
Total Governmental Funds 25,503,619$ 25,569,614$ 26,378,216$ 808,602$ 874,598$
CHANGE IN FUND
BALANCESGOVERNMENTAL
FUNDS
FUND BALANCES
---- ACTUAL -------- ACTUAL ----
$16.82
$15.39
$17.10
$8.66
$10.18
$9.27
$0.02 $0.00 $0.00 -
4
8
12
16
20
Dec 2016 Sept 2017 Dec 2017Millions General
Fund &
Subfunds
Special
Revenue
Debt
Service
Governmental Fund Balances-By Fund GroupGovernmentalFund Balances-By Fund Group
$25.50 $25.57 $26.38
-
6
12
18
24
30
Dec 2016 Sept 2017 Dec 2017MillionsGovernmentalFund
Balances -Combined
*Please note that these revenues and expenses occur within annual cycles.
This Interim Report is not adjusted for accruals or those annual cycles.
The ending fund balances for 2017 are preliminary, these will be updated
after the completion of the 2017 Financial Statements.
6.4.a
Packet Pg. 129 Attachment: Complete Preliminary December 2017 Financial Report (Preliminary 2017 December Quarterly Financial Report)
36
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS OVERVIEW
12/31/2016 9/30/2017 12/31/2017 Q4 YTD
104 - Drug Enforcement Fund 34,632$ 17,143$ 30,394$ 13,251$ (4,237)$
111 - Street Fund 790,428 1,039,208 1,107,487 68,278 317,058
112 - Combined Street Const/Improve 91,959 (21,116) (140,034) (118,918) (231,992)
117 - Municipal Arts Acquis. Fund 493,080 528,838 531,223 2,385 38,143
118 - Memorial Street Tree 18,101 18,368 18,453 85 351
120 - Hotel/Motel Tax Revenue Fund 94,468 110,138 82,527 (27,611) (11,941)
121 - Employee Parking Permit Fund 63,704 75,763 69,680 (6,082) 5,977
122 - Youth Scholarship Fund 14,931 14,396 15,433 1,037 502
123 - Tourism Promotional Fund/Arts 84,371 88,739 60,108 (28,631) (24,262)
125 - Real Estate Tax 2 2,259,949 2,654,724 1,878,708 (776,016) (381,240)
126 - Real Estate Excise Tax 1 1,977,485 2,965,816 2,454,299 (511,517) 476,814
127 - Gifts Catalog Fund 263,544 264,630 254,613 (10,017) (8,932)
129 - Special Projects Fund 38,782 39,353 11,597 (27,756) (27,185)
130 - Cemetery Maintenance/Improvement 142,339 174,417 184,833 10,417 42,494
132 - Parks Construction Fund 1,185,146 1,053,036 1,567,511 514,475 382,365
136 - Parks Trust Fund 153,793 156,058 156,778 720 2,985
137 - Cemetery Maintenance Trust Fund 901,173 928,985 936,762 7,777 35,589
138 - Sister City Commission 6,415 7,603 7,638 35 1,222
140 - Business Improvement Disrict 50,137 62,323 42,055 (20,268) (8,082)
Total Special Revenue 8,664,435$ 10,178,420$ 9,270,064$ (908,356)$ 605,630$
GOVERNMENTAL
SPECIAL REVENUE
FUND BALANCES CHANGE IN FUND BALANCES
---- ACTUAL -------- ACTUAL ----
$8.66
$10.18 $9.27
-
3
6
9
12
15
Dec 2016 Sept 2017 Dec 2017Millions Special
Revenue
Special Revenue Funds
*Please note that these revenues and expenses occur within annual cycles.
This Interim Report is not adjusted for accruals or those annual cycles.
The ending fund balances for 2017 are preliminary, these will be updated
after the completion of the 2017 Financial Statements.
6.4.a
Packet Pg. 130 Attachment: Complete Preliminary December 2017 Financial Report (Preliminary 2017 December Quarterly Financial Report)
37
ENTERPRISE FUNDS OVERVIEW
12/31/2016 9/30/2017 12/31/2017 Q4 YTD
421 - Water Utility Fund 17,869,639$ 18,322,936$ 16,472,355$ (1,850,581)$ (1,397,283)$
422 - Storm Utility Fund 10,246,573 11,053,479 10,309,568 (743,911) 62,995
423 - Sewer/WWTP Utility Fund 42,695,395 42,443,151 40,885,233 (1,557,918) (1,810,163)
424 - Bond Reserve Fund 843,960 843,965 843,966 2 6
411 - Combined Utility Operation - 122,894 - (122,894) -
Total Enterprise Funds 71,655,567$ 72,786,425$ 68,511,123$ (4,275,303)$ (3,144,444)$
ENTERPRISE
FUNDS
FUND BALANCES CHANGE IN FUND
---- ACTUAL -------- ACTUAL ----
$-
$16,472,355
$10,309,568
$40,885,233
$843,966 $226,480
0
5,000,000
10,000,000
15,000,000
20,000,000
25,000,000
30,000,000
35,000,000
40,000,000
45,000,000
50,000,000
Combined Utility Water Storm Sewer/WWTP Bond Reserve Firemen's Pension
Fund
Enterprise and Agency Fund Balances as of December 31, 2017
*Please note that these revenues and expenses occur within annual cycles.
This Interim Report is not adjusted for accruals or those annual cycles.
The ending fund balances for 2017 are preliminary, these will be updated
after the completion of the 2017 Financial Statements.
6.4.a
Packet Pg. 131 Attachment: Complete Preliminary December 2017 Financial Report (Preliminary 2017 December Quarterly Financial Report)
38
SUMMARY OVERVIEW
12/31/2016 9/30/2017 12/31/2017 Q4 YTD
Governmental Funds 25,503,619$ 25,569,614$ 26,378,216$ 808,602$ 874,598$
Enterprise Funds 71,655,567 72,786,425 68,511,123 (4,275,303) (3,144,444)
Internal Services Fund 8,311,631 8,544,858 8,589,138 44,280 277,508
Agency Funds 224,696 234,653 226,480 (8,172) 1,784
Total City-wide Total 105,695,513$ 107,135,550$ 103,704,957$ (3,430,593)$ (1,990,555)$
CITY-WIDE
FUND BALANCES
---- ACTUAL ----
CHANGE IN FUND
BALANCES
---- ACTUAL ----
$3,812
$42,055
$7,638
$936,762
$156,778
$1,567,511
$184,833
$11,597
$254,613 $2,454,299
$1,878,708
$60,108
$15,433
$69,680
$82,527
$18,453
$531,223
$1,107,487
$30,394
$- $500,000 $1,000,000 $1,500,000 $2,000,000 $2,500,000 $3,000,000 $3,500,000
L.I.D. Fund Control
Business Improvement District
Sister City Commission
Cemetery Maintenance Trust Fund
Parks Trust Fund
Parks Construction Fund
Cemetery Maintenance/Improvement
Special Projects Fund
Gifts Catalog Fund
Real Estate Excise Tax 1, Parks Acq
Real Estate Excise Tax 2
Tourism Promotional Fund/Arts
Youth Scholarship Fund
Employee Parking Permit Fund
Hotel/Motel Tax Revenue Fund
Memorial Street Fund
Municipal Arts Acquis. Fund
Combined Street Const/Improve Fund
Street Fund
Drug Enforcement Fund
Governmental Fund Balances (Excluding General Fund) as of December 31, 2017
$(140,034)
*Please note that these revenues and expenses occur within annual cycles.
This Interim Report is not adjusted for accruals or those annual cycles.
The ending balances for 2017 are preliminary, these will be updated
after the completion of the 2017 Financial Statements.
6.4.a
Packet Pg. 132 Attachment: Complete Preliminary December 2017 Financial Report (Preliminary 2017 December Quarterly Financial Report)
39
INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS OVERVIEW
12/31/2016 9/30/2017 12/31/2017 Q4 YTD
511 - Equipment Rental Fund 8,311,631$ 8,365,513$ 8,342,977$ (22,536)$ 31,347$
512 - Technology Rental Fund - 179,345 246,161 66,816 246,161
Total Internal Service Funds 8,311,631$ 8,544,858$ 8,589,138$ 44,280$ 277,508$
INTERNAL SERVICE
FUNDS
FUND BALANCES CHANGE IN FUND
BALANCES
---- ACTUAL -------- ACTUAL ----
$8,311,631 $8,365,513 $8,342,977
$0 $179,345 $246,161
-
2,000,000
4,000,000
6,000,000
8,000,000
10,000,000
Dec 2016 Sept 2017 Dec 2017
511 - Equipment Rental Fund
512 - Technology Rental Fund
Internal Service Fund Balances
*Please note that these revenues and expenses occur within annual cycles.
This Interim Report is not adjusted for accruals or those annual cycles.
The ending fund balances for 2017 are preliminary, these will be updated
after the completion of the 2017 Financial Statements.
6.4.a
Packet Pg. 133 Attachment: Complete Preliminary December 2017 Financial Report (Preliminary 2017 December Quarterly Financial Report)
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 02/20/2018
Authorization to award a construction contract for the Northstream Pipe Abandonment and Culvert
Rehabilitation Project (PPP committee referral)
Staff Lead: Rob English
Department: Engineering
Preparer: Megan Luttrell
Background/History
On February 13, 2017, staff presented this item to the Parks, Planning and Public Works Committee and
it was forwarded to the February 20th meeting for approval.
Staff Recommendation
Award contract to Trimaxx Construction in the amount of $273,985.20, and authorize a 20%
management reserve for changes and unforeseen conditions during construction.
Narrative
The project entails the abandonment of approximately 600 lineal feet of storm pipe paralleling SR
524. This pipe originally conveyed Northstream Creek, and was left over from a 2006 emergency project
to redirect the creek. The project also rehabilitates the storm culvert running under SR 524 at
approximately 11th Place North. A vicinity map is attached as Exhibit 1.
On February 6, 2018, the City received two construction bids for the project. The bids ranged from a low
of $273,985.20 to a high of $304,761.66. The bid and funding summary is attached as Exhibit 2. Trimaxx
Construction submitted the low responsive bid in the amount of $273,985.20. A review of the low
bidder’s record for responsibility and responsiveness is underway. The project costs are being funded
by the 422 Stormwater Fund.
Attachments:
Exhibit 1 - Vicinity Map
Bid Summary
6.5
Packet Pg. 134
Sibrel, City of Edmonds, 2018
City of Edmonds
Vicinity Map
Northstream Pipe
Abandonment and Culvert
Rehabilitation Project
Project Extent
Project Location
EXHIBIT 1
6.5.a
Packet Pg. 135 Attachment: Exhibit 1 - Vicinity Map (Authorization to award a construction contract for the Northstream Pipe Abandonment/Culvert Rehab)
City of Edmonds
Northstream Pipe Abandonment and Culvert Rehab
Bid Summary
6-Feb-18
Construction Contract
Mgmt Reserve (20%)2018 Fund 422, Storm 438,000$
Construction Mgmt 15%Total Available Funds 438,000$
Total Construction
Trimaxx Construction North Hill Construction
54,797$
Available Funding
Construction Estimate & Bids $294,524.16 $273,985.20 $304,761.66
369,880$
Construction Contract Funds Required
273,985.20$
41,098$
Engineer's Estimate
6.5.b
Packet Pg. 136 Attachment: Bid Summary (Authorization to award a construction contract for the Northstream Pipe Abandonment/Culvert Rehab)
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 02/20/2018
Authorization for Mayor to sign an Interlocal Agreement with the Edmonds School District to fund
overlay of 236th St. from 94th Ave to 92nd Ave (PPP committee referral)
Staff Lead: Rob English
Department: Engineering
Preparer: Megan Luttrell
Background/History
On February 13, 2017, staff presented this item to the Parks, Planning and Public Works Committee and
it was forwarded to the February 20th meeting for approval.
Staff Recommendation
Authorize Mayor to sign the Interlocal Agreement.
Narrative
As part of the ongoing construction of the Madrona School in Edmonds, Edmonds School District (ESD)
will be reconstructing a portion of 236th St SW.
This section of 236th St in front of Madrona School is scheduled for an overlay, but the ongoing
construction at the school presents coordination challenges.
In order to minimize disruption and avoid conflicts between contractors, staff recommends ESD’s
contractor pave 236th St SW at the same time they’re performing their own paving work.
The proposed Interlocal Agreement will establish a cooperative relationship between ESD and the City of
Edmonds in order to complete the proposed paving.
Attachments:
ESD ILA 236th St. (with SEC edits) 2.8.18
6.6
Packet Pg. 137
00358-0863/138457520.2
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT
CITY OF EDMONDS AND EDMONDS SCHOOL DISTRICT
236TH ST SW PAVING
THIS INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) is entered into by and between the City of
Edmonds, Washington (the “City”) and Edmonds School District (the “District”) (collectively, the
“Parties”) as of the date entered below.
WHEREAS, Chapter 39.34 RCW authorizes two or more political subdivisions or units of local
government of the State of Washington to cooperate on a basis of mutual advantage to provide for
services and facilities; and
WHEREAS, the District is currently constructing a new Madrona School (the “Project”); and
WHEREAS, the District plans to install certain frontage improvements on the south side of 236th St SW
within the limits of the Project; and
WHEREAS, the Project will require a half width pavement reconstruction of 236th St SW from
approximately 9315 236th St. SW to 92nd Ave W; and
WHEREAS, the City desires to expand the District’s half-width pavement reconstruction to include a half
width pavement grind and overlay of 236th St SW from approximately 23520 94th Ave W to 92nd Ave W
per attached exhibit; and
WHEREAS, a half width pavement grind and overlay of 236th St SW will provide a durable and
consistent pavement section; and
WHEREAS, adding the half width pavement grind and overlay work to the District’s Project will
minimize the disruption to residents on 236th St SW; and
WHEREAS, the Parties agree to share the cost of the pavement grind and overlay on 236th St SW and
establish a formal arrangement under which the City will pay the District in exchange for the District
incorporating the City’s pavement overlay work into the Project; and
WHEREAS, the Parties desire to enter into this Agreement for the purpose of defining their respective
rights, obligations, costs and liabilities regarding this undertaking; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Edmonds has taken appropriate action to approve the City’s
entry into this Agreement; and
WHEREAS, the District Board has taken appropriate action to approve the District’s entry into this
Agreement;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the terms, conditions and covenants contained herein, the City
and the District agree as follows:
6.6.a
Packet Pg. 138 Attachment: ESD ILA 236th St. (with SEC edits) 2.8.18 (ILA with Edmonds School District for Overlay of 236th)
00358-0863/138457520.2
TERMS
Section 1. Purpose. The purpose of this Agreement is to establish a formal arrangement under which the
City will pay the District to incorporate the overlay work into the Project and to construct said work in
conjunction with the District’s construction of the Project. The terms, conditions and covenants of this
Agreement shall accordingly be interpreted to advance this purpose. This Agreement further seeks to
allocate and define the Parties’ respective rights, obligations, costs and liabilities concerning the
establishment, operation and maintenance of this undertaking.
Section 2. Term. This Agreement shall be effective upon its execution by the Parties hereto. Unless
terminated in accordance with Section 3, this Agreement shall remain effective until the sooner of the
following events: (a) the City’s written acceptance of and payment for the District overlay work provided
to the City pursuant to this Agreement, or (b) December 31, 2018, when it shall expire automatically. The
Parties may at their option renew this Agreement for a mutually agreed upon term by a writing signed by
both Parties.
Section 3. Termination. Either Party may terminate this Agreement with or without cause by providing
the other Party with thirty (30) days’ written notice of its intent to terminate. Termination or expiration
shall not alter the City’s payment obligations under Section 6 for services already rendered, or for the
normal and reasonable costs incurred by the contractor in terminating and closing out the City’s portion of
the work, and shall not alter the Parties’ respective obligations under Section 10 of this Agreement.
Section 4. Obligations of the City. The City agrees to:
A. Reimburse the District for all actual costs related to the pavement overlay in accordance with
the terms of Section 6 of this Agreement. The City’s share of construction cost shall not
exceed $35,000.00 without prior approval by the City, which approval shall not be
unreasonably withheld.
B. Reimburse the District for the City’s prorated share of the District’s actual consultant cost for
construction engineering and management of the pavement grind and overlay work. The City’s
share of the District’s actual costs for construction engineering and management shall be
prorated based on the City’s share of the total construction cost for the pavement grind and
overlay work. The City share shall not exceed $3,500.00 without prior approval by the City,
which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld.
C. Respond promptly to information requests submitted by the District or its agents regarding the
pavement grind and overlay work.
D. Provide written acceptance of the work to the District upon satisfactory completion of the
pavement grind and overlay work.
Section 5. Obligations of the District. The District agrees to:
A. Incorporate the half width pavement grind and overlay work into project documents by change
order.
B. Submit to the City written invoices for payment in accordance with Section 6. Include copies
of invoices or other documentation from consultants and/or contractors clearly indicating the
City’s portion of the invoices.
C. Provide City personnel reasonable access to the Project’s construction area for purposes of
inspecting and monitoring the progress of the work.
D. Respond promptly to information requests submitted by the City or its agents regarding the
Project.
6.6.a
Packet Pg. 139 Attachment: ESD ILA 236th St. (with SEC edits) 2.8.18 (ILA with Edmonds School District for Overlay of 236th)
00358-0863/138457520.2
Section 6. Payment Schedule. The Parties agree to the following billing and payment schedule:
A. For construction contract costs and for construction engineering and management costs
incurred by the District for the City’s pavement grind and overlay work, the District shall
within thirty (30) days submit an invoice to the City for the City’s share of said expenses for
the pavement grind and overlay. Said invoice shall contain a reasonably detailed explanation
of the methodology utilized by the District in determining the City’s share of each expense. To
the extent reasonably possible, the District shall document and tabulate separately the actual
quantities of work installed to clearly identify the City’s cost for the pavement grind and
overlay work.
B. Within thirty (30) days of receiving any invoice pursuant to subsection 6.A, the City shall
tender payment to the District in the form of a check, money order or other certified funds for
the invoiced amount, provided that such invoiced amounts shall not exceed an aggregate total
of $38,500.00 unless approved by the City pursuant to Sections 4(A) and 4(B) of this
Agreement.
C. In the event that the Parties disagree regarding the City’s share of any expense incurred by the
District regarding the Project, the Parties may agree to submit the question for resolution by a
mediator or arbitrator acceptable to both Parties.
Section 7. Ownership and Disposition of Property. The pavement grind and overlay work done pursuant
to this Agreement shall become and remain the exclusive property of the City upon completion.
Section 8. Administration. No Separate Entity Created. The General Manager for the District shall serve
as the administrator of this Agreement. No separate legal entity is formed by this Agreement.
Section 9. Release, Indemnification and Hold Harmless Agreement. Each Party to this Agreement shall be
responsible for its own negligent and/or wrongful acts or omissions, and those of its own agents,
employees, representatives, contractors or subcontractors, to the fullest extent required by the laws of the
State of Washington. Each Party (the “Indemnifying Party”) agrees to protect, indemnify and save the
other Party (the “Indemnified Party”) harmless from and against any and all such liability for injury or
damage to the Indemnified Party or the Indemnified Party’s property, and also from and against all
claims, demands and causes of action of every kind and character arising directly or indirectly, or in any
way incident to, in connection with, or arising out of work performed under the terms hereof, to the extent
caused by the Indemnifying Party’s fault or that of its agents, employees, representatives, contractors or
subcontractors. The Indemnifying Party specifically promises to indemnify the Indemnified Party against
claims or suits brought under Title 51 RCW by its own employees, contractors or subcontractors, and
waives any immunity that the Indemnifying Party may have under that title with respect to, but only to,
the limited extent necessary to indemnify the Indemnified Party.
Section 10. Governing Law and Venue. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of
Washington. Any action arising out of this Agreement shall be brought in Snohomish County Superior
Court.
Section 11. No Employment Relationship Created. The Parties agree that nothing in this Agreement shall
be construed to create an employment relationship between the City and any employee, agent,
representative or contractor of the District, or between the District and any employee, agent,
representative or contractor of the City.
6.6.a
Packet Pg. 140 Attachment: ESD ILA 236th St. (with SEC edits) 2.8.18 (ILA with Edmonds School District for Overlay of 236th)
00358-0863/138457520.2
Section 12. No Third Party Rights. This Agreement is intended for the sole and exclusive benefit of the
Parties hereto and no third party rights are created by this Agreement.
Section 13. Notices. Notices to the District shall be sent to the following address:
EDMONDS SCHOOL DISTRICT
Capital Projects Office
20420 68th Avenue W
Lynnwood, WA 98036-7400
Notices to the City shall be sent to the following address:
City of Edmonds
City Engineer
121 Fifth Avenue N
Edmonds, WA 98020
Section 14. Duty to Post Agreement to District Website. The District shall, after this Agreement is
executed by both Parties, post this Agreement to the District website.
Section 15. Integration. This document constitutes the entire embodiment of the Agreement between the
Parties and, unless modified in writing by an amendment to this Agreement signed by the Parties hereto,
shall be implemented as described above.
Section 16. Non-Waiver. Waiver by any Party of any of the provisions contained within this Agreement,
including but not limited to any performance deadline, shall not be construed as a waiver of any other
provision.
Section 17. Entire Agreement. These provisions represent the entire and integrated agreement of the
parties regarding the subject matter hereof and may not be modified or amended except as provided
herein. Any understanding, whether oral or written, which is not incorporated herein, is expressly
excluded.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement, effective on the latest date
shown below. Each party represents and warrants that its signatory below possesses the authority to
execute this Agreement and bind on behalf of such party their respective entities.
CITY OF EDMONDS EDMONDS SCHOOL DISTRICT
By: By:
DAVID O. EARLING Date Dr. Kris McDuffy Date
Mayor Superintendent
Approved as to form only:
City of Edmonds
Office of the City Attorney
6.6.a
Packet Pg. 141 Attachment: ESD ILA 236th St. (with SEC edits) 2.8.18 (ILA with Edmonds School District for Overlay of 236th)
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 02/20/2018
Authorization for Mayor to sign a Supplemental Agreement with Murraysmith (formerly MSA) for Five
Corners Reservoir Re-Coating Project (PPP committee referral)
Staff Lead: Rob English
Department: Engineering
Preparer: Megan Luttrell
Background/History
On April 5, 2016, Council authorized the Mayor to sign Supplemental Agreement No. 1 with Murray,
Smith & Associates.
On April 4, 2017, Council authorized the Mayor to sign Supplemental Agreement No. 2 with Murray,
Smith & Associates.
On February 13, 2017, staff presented this item to the Parks, Planning and Public Works Committee and
it was forwarded to the February 20th meeting for approval.
Staff Recommendation
Authorize Mayor to sign the Supplemental Agreement.
Narrative
The Five Corners Reservoir Re-Coating project will complete the recoating of the City’s 1.5 million gallon
(MG) and 3.0MG welded steel reservoirs and provide seismic upgrades to the 1.5MG reservoir. Other
improvements include installation of overflow piping, roof vented hood assemblies, and cathodic
protection for both reservoirs. Additional improvements to the $1.5MG reservoir include a new roof
access hatch and miscellaneous pipe improvements within the site. The project is anticipated to begin
in March and continue until summer 2019.
The proposed supplemental agreement with Murraysmith will provide engineering support services
during the construction phase. The scope of work includes the following support tasks: (1) shop drawing
and submittal reviews; (2) Request for Information and Change Orders; (3) On-call construction
observation support; (4) Sub-consultant support; (5) Special Inspections; (6) Final inspection and start-
up; and (7) record drawings. The supplement also includes extra design costs to complete the
construction documents and a management reserve of $8,000.
The professional services fee for the Supplement Agreement is $107,846. With this supplement, the
total professional service fee with Murraysmith is $418,159. The project costs are being paid by the
Water Utility Fund. Construction bids will be opened on Thursday, February 8, 2018. The bid results and
construction budget will be provided to the committee.
6.7
Packet Pg. 142
BACKGROUND:
On August 3, 2015 the City entered into a $71,019 contract with MSA to provide evaluations and
recommendations for the Five Corners Reservoir. A structural analysis was performed using available as-
built records and seismic codes updated since the City’s 2004 structural evaluation. The results of the
analysis led to concerns about the structural integrity of the two reservoirs.
On April 18, 2016 the City entered into a Professional Services Supplemental Agreement 1 with MSA for
$60,465. MSA’s technical memorandum concluded that the reservoirs could meet current seismic codes
and be operational within the City’s parameters for water service by lowering the level of the reservoir
overflow pipes and making minor structural enhancements to the roof of the 1.5 MG tank.
On April 7, 2017 the City entered into a Professional Services Supplemental Agreement 2 with MSA for
$178,829 to provide plans, specifications and construction cost estimates for reservoir improvements
including recoating, structural modifications, site piping modifications and water quality and safety
improvements.
Attachments:
MSA.Supp 3
6.7
Packet Pg. 143
6.7.a
Packet Pg. 144 Attachment: MSA.Supp 3 (Murraysmith Supplement for Five Corners Reservoir Re-Coating)
6.7.a
Packet Pg. 145 Attachment: MSA.Supp 3 (Murraysmith Supplement for Five Corners Reservoir Re-Coating)
6.7.a
Packet Pg. 146 Attachment: MSA.Supp 3 (Murraysmith Supplement for Five Corners Reservoir Re-Coating)
6.7.a
Packet Pg. 147 Attachment: MSA.Supp 3 (Murraysmith Supplement for Five Corners Reservoir Re-Coating)
6.7.a
Packet Pg. 148 Attachment: MSA.Supp 3 (Murraysmith Supplement for Five Corners Reservoir Re-Coating)
6.7.a
Packet Pg. 149 Attachment: MSA.Supp 3 (Murraysmith Supplement for Five Corners Reservoir Re-Coating)
6.7.a
Packet Pg. 150 Attachment: MSA.Supp 3 (Murraysmith Supplement for Five Corners Reservoir Re-Coating)
6.7.a
Packet Pg. 151 Attachment: MSA.Supp 3 (Murraysmith Supplement for Five Corners Reservoir Re-Coating)
6.7.a
Packet Pg. 152 Attachment: MSA.Supp 3 (Murraysmith Supplement for Five Corners Reservoir Re-Coating)
6.7.a
Packet Pg. 153 Attachment: MSA.Supp 3 (Murraysmith Supplement for Five Corners Reservoir Re-Coating)
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 02/20/2018
2018 Carryforward Budget Amendments
Staff Lead: Scott James
Department: Administrative Services
Preparer: Debra Sharp
Background/History
During the development and approval of the 2018 Budget, staff included estimated budget amounts for
projects that were underway. As the 2017 Budget Year came to a close, actual project expenditures
were determined. The 2018 Carryforward Budget Amendment will roll the unexpended 2017
expenditures into the 2018 Budget.
Council Finance Committee Recommendation To Approve the 2018 Carryforward Budget Amendment
on the Consent Agenda
Since the 2018 Carryforward Budget Amendment is only rolling forward unexpended 2017 Budget into
2018 so staff can complete 2017 projects, the Finance Committee recommends Council to approve the
2018 Carryforward Budget Amendment, Ordinance No. XXXX as presented as a Consent Agenda item.
Narrative
Staff prepared 44 decision package requests to present Council for their review and approval. The
Carryforward Budget Amendment will roll the unexpended 2017 project budgets into the 2018 Budget.
Each decision package includes budgeted amounts that Council approved during the 2017 Budget Year.
Since each item was already discussed and approved by Council, staff will be prepared to answer
questions regarding the carryforward budget requests.
Attachments:
2018 Carryforward Budget Amendment Ordinance
6.8
Packet Pg. 154
1
ORDINANCE NO. _______
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 4094 AS A RESULT OF UNANTICIPATED TRANSFERS AND EXPENDITURES OF VARIOUS FUNDS, AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE.
WHEREAS, previous actions taken by the City Council require Interfund
Transfers and increases in appropriations; and
WHEREAS, state law requires an ordinance be adopted whenever money is
transferred from one fund to another; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the amended budget appropriations
and information which was made available; and approves the appropriation of local, state, and
federal funds and the increase or decrease from previously approved programs within the 2018
Budget; and
WHEREAS, the applications of funds have been identified;
THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Section 1. of Ordinance No. 4094 adopting the final budget for the
fiscal year 2018 is hereby amended to reflect the changes shown in Exhibits A, B, C, D, and E
adopted herein by reference.
Section 2. Effective Date. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power
specifically delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum, and shall take
6.8.a
Packet Pg. 155 Attachment: 2018 Carryforward Budget Amendment Ordinance (2018 Carryforward Budget Amendments)
2
effect five (5) days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of
the title.
APPROVED:
MAYOR, DAVE EARLING ATTEST/AUTHENTICATE:
CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY:
BY
JEFF TARADAY
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
PUBLISHED:
EFFECTIVE DATE:
ORDINANCE NO.
6.8.a
Packet Pg. 156 Attachment: 2018 Carryforward Budget Amendment Ordinance (2018 Carryforward Budget Amendments)
3
SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. __________
of the City of Edmonds, Washington
On the ____ day of ___________, 2018, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed Ordinance No. _____________. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting of the title, provides as follows:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING
ORDINANCE NO. 4094 AS A RESULT OF UNANTICIPATED TRANSFERS AND EXPENDITURES OF VARIOUS FUNDS, AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE.
The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request.
DATED this _____ day of ________________, 2018.
CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY
6.8.a
Packet Pg. 157 Attachment: 2018 Carryforward Budget Amendment Ordinance (2018 Carryforward Budget Amendments)
EXHIBIT “A”: Budget Amendment Summary (February 2018)
4
2018 2018
FUND FUND BEGINNING ENDING
NO.DESCRIPTION FUND BALANCE REVENUE EXPENDITURES FUND BALANCE
001 GENERAL FUND 8,848,530 38,801,555 43,544,161 4,105,924
009 LEOFF-MEDICAL INS. RESERVE 651,630 285,650 294,270 643,010
011 RISK MANAGEMENT RESERVE FUND 881,320 19,180 - 900,500
012 CONTINGENCY RESERVE FUND 5,430,360 64,750 49,584 5,445,526
014 HISTORIC PRESERVATION GIFT FUND 7,410 5,170 5,400 7,180
104 DRUG ENFORCEMENT FUND 111,460 130,560 103,252 138,768
111 STREET FUND 751,270 1,784,270 1,856,507 679,033
112 COMBINED STREET CONST/IMPROVE 960,515 3,602,203 3,493,588 1,069,130
117 MUNICIPAL ARTS ACQUIS. FUND 503,752 146,200 183,892 466,060
118 MEMORIAL STREET TREE 18,480 400 - 18,880
120 HOTEL/MOTEL TAX REVENUE FUND 82,000 87,960 90,550 79,410
121 EMPLOYEE PARKING PERMIT FUND 62,380 25,640 26,880 61,140
122 YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP FUND 14,910 850 1,000 14,760
123 TOURISM PROMOTIONAL FUND/ARTS 58,610 30,520 29,700 59,430
125 PARK ACQ/IMPROVEMENT 1,864,140 1,446,880 2,733,000 578,020
126 SPECIAL CAPITAL FUND 2,037,992 1,448,300 2,517,397 968,895
127 GIFTS CATALOG FUND 261,230 53,810 45,900 269,140
130 CEMETERY MAINTENANCE/IMPROV 225,425 180,170 213,509 192,086
136 PARKS TRUST FUND 156,800 3,150 - 159,950
137 CEMETERY MAINTENANCE TRUST FD 941,518 33,360 - 974,878
138 SISTER CITY COMMISSION 6,080 10,170 10,500 5,750
211 LID FUND CONTROL 16,210 14,400 16,450 14,160
231 2012 LTGO DEBT SERVICE FUND - 708,700 708,700 -
332 PARKS CONSTRUCTION 1,925,658 1,621,977 2,146,881 1,400,754
421 WATER 16,542,613 9,660,690 13,295,475 12,907,828
422 STORM 9,619,892 5,317,996 6,836,460 8,101,428
423 SEWER / TREATMENT PLANT 40,160,311 11,917,843 14,158,802 37,919,352
424 BOND RESERVE FUND 842,990 1,991,530 1,991,520 843,000
511 EQUIPMENT RENTAL FUND 8,236,930 1,624,640 1,662,265 8,199,305
512 Technology Rental Fund 201,600 1,268,390 1,335,413 134,577
617 FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND 222,880 69,690 75,218 217,352
Totals 101,644,896 82,356,604 97,426,274 86,575,226
6.8.a
Packet Pg. 158 Attachment: 2018 Carryforward Budget Amendment Ordinance (2018 Carryforward Budget Amendments)
EXHIBIT “B”: Budget Amendments by Revenue (February 2018)
5
ORD. NO.ORD. NO.ORD. NO.2018
FUND FUND 4089 4094 Amended
NO.DESCRIPTION 1/1/2018 1/1/2018 Budget
001 General Fund 38,783,555$ -$ 18,000$ 38,801,555$
009 Leoff-Medical Ins. Reserve 285,650 - - 285,650
011 Risk Management Reserve Fund 19,180 - - 19,180
012 Contingency Reserve Fund 64,750 - - 64,750
014 Historic Preservation Gift Fund 5,170 - - 5,170
104 Drug Enforcement Fund 130,560 - - 130,560
111 Street Fund 1,784,270 - - 1,784,270
112 Combined Street Const/Improve 2,942,656 - 659,547 3,602,203
117 Municipal Arts Acquis. Fund 146,200 - - 146,200
118 Memorial Street Tree 400 - - 400
120 Hotel/Motel Tax Revenue Fund 87,960 - - 87,960
121 Employee Parking Permit Fund 25,640 - - 25,640
122 Youth Scholarship Fund 850 - - 850
123 Tourism Promotional Fund/Arts 30,520 - - 30,520
125 Park Acq/Improvement 1,446,880 - - 1,446,880
126 Special Capital Fund 1,448,300 - - 1,448,300
127 Gifts Catalog Fund 53,810 - - 53,810
130 Cemetery Maintenance/Improv 180,170 - - 180,170
136 Parks Trust Fund 3,150 - - 3,150
137 Cemetery Maintenance Trust Fd 33,360 - - 33,360
138 Sister City Commission 10,170 - - 10,170
211 Lid Fund Control 14,400 - - 14,400
231 2012 LTGO Debt Service fund 708,700 - - 708,700
332 Parks Construction 1,494,534 - 127,443 1,621,977
421 Water 9,660,690 - - 9,660,690
422 Storm 5,317,996 - - 5,317,996
423 Sewer / Treatment Plant 11,566,980 - 350,863 11,917,843
424 Bond Reserve Fund 1,991,530 - - 1,991,530
511 Equipment Rental Fund 1,624,640 - - 1,624,640
512 Technology Rental Fund 1,268,390 - - 1,268,390
617 Firemen'S Pension Fund 69,690 - - 69,690
Totals 81,200,751$ -$ 1,155,853$ 82,356,604$
6.8.a
Packet Pg. 159 Attachment: 2018 Carryforward Budget Amendment Ordinance (2018 Carryforward Budget Amendments)
EXHIBIT “C”: Budget Amendments by Expenditure (February 2018)
6
ORD. NO.ORD. NO.ORD. NO.2018
FUND FUND 4089 4094 0 Amended
NO.DESCRIPTION 1/1/2018 1/1/2018 Budget
001 General Fund 43,086,131$ 272,000$ 186,030$ 43,544,161$
009 Leoff-Medical Ins. Reserve 294,270 - - 294,270
011 Risk Management Reserve Fund - - - -
012 Contingency Reserve Fund 49,584 - - 49,584
014 Historic Preservation Gift Fund 5,400 - - 5,400
104 Drug Enforcement Fund 103,252 - - 103,252
111 Street Fund 1,856,507 - - 1,856,507
112 Combined Street Const/Improve 2,823,041 - 670,547 3,493,588
117 Municipal Arts Acquis. Fund 182,480 - 1,412 183,892
120 Hotel/Motel Tax Revenue Fund 90,550 - - 90,550
121 Employee Parking Permit Fund 26,880 - - 26,880
122 Youth Scholarship Fund 1,000 - - 1,000
123 Tourism Promotional Fund/Arts 29,700 - - 29,700
125 Park Acq/Improvement 2,432,040 - 300,960 2,733,000
126 Special Capital Fund 1,734,535 - 782,862 2,517,397
127 Gifts Catalog Fund 45,900 - - 45,900
130 Cemetery Maintenance/Improv 197,514 - 15,995 213,509
136 Parks Trust Fund - - - -
137 Cemetery Maintenance Trust Fd - - - -
138 Sister City Commission 10,500 - - 10,500
211 Lid Fund Control 16,450 - - 16,450
231 2012LTGO Debt Service Fund 708,700 - - 708,700
332 Parks Construction 1,982,160 - 164,721 2,146,881
421 Water 12,270,201 - 1,025,274 13,295,475
422 Storm 6,562,877 - 273,583 6,836,460
423 Sewer / Treatment Plant 13,066,764 - 1,092,038 14,158,802
424 Bond Reserve Fund 1,991,520 - - 1,991,520
511 Equipment Rental Fund 1,662,265 - - 1,662,265
512 Technology Rental Fund 1,191,113 - 144,300 1,335,413
617 Firemen'S Pension Fund 75,218 - - 75,218
Totals 92,496,552$ 272,000$ 4,657,722$ 97,426,274$
6.8.a
Packet Pg. 160 Attachment: 2018 Carryforward Budget Amendment Ordinance (2018 Carryforward Budget Amendments)
EXHIBIT “D”: Budget Amendment Summary (February 2018)
7
Fund Number
Change in
Beginning Fund
Balance Revenue Expense
Change in Ending
Fund Balance
001 168,030 18,000 186,030 -
112 11,000 659,547 670,547 -
117 1,412 - 1,412 -
125 300,960 - 300,960 -
126 782,862 - 782,862 -
130 15,995 - 15,995 -
332 37,278 127,443 164,721 -
421 1,025,274 - 1,025,274 -
422 273,583 - 273,583 -
423 741,175 350,863 1,092,038 -
512 144,300 - 144,300 -
Total Change 3,501,869 1,155,853 4,657,722 -
6.8.a
Packet Pg. 161 Attachment: 2018 Carryforward Budget Amendment Ordinance (2018 Carryforward Budget Amendments)
EXHIBIT “E”: Carryforward Items for Council to Consider (February 2018)
8
Budget Amendment for:Carryforward Item
Item Description:
Department:
Division:
Title:
Preparer:
Department Account Number:
Budget Amendment Type?
What is the nature of the expenditure?One-Time
Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital?Capital
Fill In Item Description[s]
Baseline
Budget 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
0 10,000 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
Sub-Total $0 $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
$10,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
Revenue and Beginning Cash 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Beginning Cash: Carryforward 10,000 0 0 0 0
Beginning Cash: Carryforward 0 0 0 0 0
Grants/Contributions 0 0 0 0 0
General Fund Subsidy 0 0 0 0 0
New Revenue 0 0 0 0 0
Other 0 0 0 0 0
Total Revenue and Beginning Cash $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
001.00.22.518.10.49.00
Miscellaneous
If previously discussed, date(s) of discussion:
Carryforward
Safety program costs (SAW reimbursements) - carry forward $10,000 of unused
funds from SAW reimbursements and program monies to continue to fund
training costs.
Human Resources
GENERALFund
Name:Mary Ann Hardie
same as ablove
Total Expenses
Comments
001.000.308.00.000.00
6.8.a
Packet Pg. 162 Attachment: 2018 Carryforward Budget Amendment Ordinance (2018 Carryforward Budget Amendments)
EXHIBIT “E”: Carryforward Items for Council to Consider (February 2018)
9
Budget Amendment for:Carryforward Item
Item Description:
Department:
Division:
Title:
Preparer:
Department Account Number:
Budget Amendment Type?
What is the nature of the expenditure?One-Time
Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital?Operating
Fill In Item Description[s]
Baseline
Budget 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
31,000 2,000 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
Sub-Total $31,000 $2,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
$33,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
Revenue and Beginning Cash 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Beginning Cash: Carryforward 2,000 0 0 0 0
Beginning Cash: Carryforward 0 0 0 0 0
Grants/Contributions 0 0 0 0 0
General Fund Subsidy 0 0 0 0 0
New Revenue 0 0 0 0 0
Other 0 0 0 0 0
Total Revenue and Beginning Cash $2,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
If previously discussed, date(s) of discussion:
001.000.61.558.70.41.00
Professional Services
Carryforward
Total Expenses
Comments
001.000.308.00.00.00
$2,000 contribution to Port of Edmonds tourism advertising project for Denver
market, not expended in 2017.
Community Services and Economic Development
GENERALEconomic Development Fund
Name:Port of Edmonds Marketing Project
Community Services and Economic Development
6.8.a
Packet Pg. 163 Attachment: 2018 Carryforward Budget Amendment Ordinance (2018 Carryforward Budget Amendments)
EXHIBIT “E”: Carryforward Items for Council to Consider (February 2018)
10
Budget Amendment for:Carryforward Item
Item Description:
Department:
Division:
Title:
Preparer:
Department Account Number:
Budget Amendment Type?
What is the nature of the expenditure?One-Time
Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital?Operating
Fill In Item Description[s]
Baseline
Budget 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
31,000 5,000 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
Sub-Total $31,000 $5,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
$36,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
Revenue and Beginning Cash 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Beginning Cash: Carryforward 5,000 0 0 0 0
Beginning Cash: Carryforward 0 0 0 0 0
Grants/Contributions 0 0 0 0 0
General Fund Subsidy 0 0 0 0 0
New Revenue 0 0 0 0 0
Other 0 0 0 0 0
Total Revenue and Beginning Cash $5,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
If previously discussed, date(s) of discussion:
001.000.61.558.70.41.00
Professional Services
Carryforward
Total Expenses
Comments
001.000.308.00.00.00
Contribution from Economic Development 2017 budget of $5,000 for the Arts &
Culture Economic Impact Study. This will constitute the final payment to the
consultant team who did not finalized the study in 2017, but will be presenting
final report at City Council 2/26/18.
Community Services and Economic Development
GENERALEconomic Development Fund
Name:Professional Services
Community Services and Economic Development
6.8.a
Packet Pg. 164 Attachment: 2018 Carryforward Budget Amendment Ordinance (2018 Carryforward Budget Amendments)
EXHIBIT “E”: Carryforward Items for Council to Consider (February 2018)
11
Budget Amendment for:Carryforward Item
Item Description:
Department:
Division:
Title:
Preparer:
Department Account Number:
Budget Amendment Type?
What is the nature of the expenditure?One-Time
Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital?Operating
Fill In Item Description[s]
Baseline
Budget 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
0 3,030 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
Sub-Total $0 $3,030 $0 $0 $0 $0
$3,030 $0 $0 $0 $0
Revenue and Beginning Cash 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Beginning Cash: Carryforward 3,030 0 0 0 0
Beginning Cash: Carryforward 0 0 0 0 0
Grants/Contributions 0 0 0 0 0
General Fund Subsidy 0 0 0 0 0
New Revenue 0 0 0 0 0
Other 0 0 0 0 0
Total Revenue and Beginning Cash $3,030 $0 $0 $0 $0
In 2017, the city budgeted $125,000 to begin implementation of a new digital
permit tracking system. $121,970 of the budgeted amount was spent in 2017, and
the remaining $3,030 is being carried forward to 2018 to add to the 2018 budget for
the project.
Development Services
GENERALDevelopment Services Admin Fund
Name:Digital Permit Tracking System
Rob Chave
Total Expenses
Comments
001.000.308.00.000.00
If previously discussed, date(s) of discussion:
001.000.62.524.10
DS-Admin Professional Services
Carryforward
6.8.a
Packet Pg. 165 Attachment: 2018 Carryforward Budget Amendment Ordinance (2018 Carryforward Budget Amendments)
EXHIBIT “E”: Carryforward Items for Council to Consider (February 2018)
12
Budget Amendment for:Carryforward Item
Item Description:
Department:
Division:
Title:
Preparer:
Department Account Number:
Budget Amendment Type?
What is the nature of the expenditure?One-Time
Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital?Operating
Fill In Item Description[s]
Baseline
Budget 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
0 30,000 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
Sub-Total $0 $30,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
$30,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
Revenue and Beginning Cash 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Beginning Cash: Carryforward 30,000 0 0 0 0
Beginning Cash: Carryforward 0 0 0 0 0
Grants/Contributions 0 0 0 0 0
General Fund Subsidy 0 0 0 0 0
New Revenue 0 0 0 0 0
Other 0 0 0 0 0
Total Revenue and Beginning Cash $30,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
If previously discussed, date(s) of discussion:2017 Budget
001.000.62.524
001.000.62.524.10.41.00 Prof. Svcs
Carryforward
Total Expenses
Comments
001.000.308.00.000.00
At the end of 2017, $30,000 in professional services remained unspent on updating
the development code. This amount is requested to be carried forward as part of
completing the next phase of the code update in 2018.
Development Services
GENERALDevelopment Services Fund
Name:Rewrite ECDC
Shane Hope
6.8.a
Packet Pg. 166 Attachment: 2018 Carryforward Budget Amendment Ordinance (2018 Carryforward Budget Amendments)
EXHIBIT “E”: Carryforward Items for Council to Consider (February 2018)
13
Budget Amendment for:Carryforward Item
Item Description:
Department:
Division:
Title:
Preparer:
Department Account Number:
Budget Amendment Type?
What is the nature of the expenditure?One-Time
Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital?Operating
Fill In Item Description[s]
Baseline
Budget 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
0 20,000 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
Sub-Total $0 $20,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
$20,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
Revenue and Beginning Cash 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Beginning Cash: Carryforward 20,000 0 0 0 0
Beginning Cash: Carryforward 0 0 0 0 0
Grants/Contributions 0 0 0 0 0
General Fund Subsidy 0 0 0 0 0
New Revenue 0 0 0 0 0
Other 0 0 0 0 0
Total Revenue and Beginning Cash $20,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
001.000.62.524
001.000.62.524.10.41.00 Prof. Svcs
If previously discussed, date(s) of discussion:2017 Budget
Carryforward
At the end of 2017, $20,000 in professional services remains unspent on
developing a Housing Strategy by 2019 for increasing the supply of affordable
housing and meeting diverse housing needs. A consultant was hired and this
amount is requested to be carried forward as part of completing the Housing
Strategy in 2018.
Development Services
GENERALDevelopment Services Fund
Name:Housing Strategy
Shane Hope
Total Expenses
Comments
001.000.308.00.000.00
6.8.a
Packet Pg. 167 Attachment: 2018 Carryforward Budget Amendment Ordinance (2018 Carryforward Budget Amendments)
EXHIBIT “E”: Carryforward Items for Council to Consider (February 2018)
14
Budget Amendment for:Carryforward Item
Item Description:
Department:
Division:
Title:
Preparer:
Department Account Number:
Budget Amendment Type?
What is the nature of the expenditure?One-Time
Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital?Operating
Fill In Item Description[s]
Baseline
Budget 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
0 12,000 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
Sub-Total $0 $12,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
$12,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
Revenue and Beginning Cash 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Beginning Cash: Carryforward 12,000 0 0 0 0
Beginning Cash: Carryforward 0 0 0 0 0
Grants/Contributions 0 0 0 0 0
General Fund Subsidy 0 0 0 0 0
New Revenue 0 0 0 0 0
Other 0 0 0 0 0
Total Revenue and Beginning Cash $12,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
001.000.62.524.20.41
Professional Services
If previously discussed, date(s) of discussion:
Carryforward
Professional Services are used for outside consultant plan review of major building
projects. The 2017 adjusted appropriation amount was $92,000 of which only
$80,000 was spent. This amount is requested to be carried forward in 2018.
Development Services
GENERALBuildingFund
Name:Professional Services
Leif Bjorback
Total Expenses
Comments
001.000.308.00.000.00
6.8.a
Packet Pg. 168 Attachment: 2018 Carryforward Budget Amendment Ordinance (2018 Carryforward Budget Amendments)
EXHIBIT “E”: Carryforward Items for Council to Consider (February 2018)
15
Budget Amendment for:Carryforward Item
Item Description:
Department:
Division:
Title:
Preparer:
Department Account Number:
Budget Amendment Type?
What is the nature of the expenditure?One-Time
Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital?Operating
Fill In Item Description[s]
Baseline
Budget 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
0 45,000 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
Sub-Total $0 $45,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
$45,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
Revenue and Beginning Cash 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Beginning Cash: Carryforward 45,000 0 0 0 0
Beginning Cash: Carryforward 0 0 0 0 0
Grants/Contributions 0 0 0 0 0
General Fund Subsidy 0 0 0 0 0
New Revenue 0 0 0 0 0
Other 0 0 0 0 0
Total Revenue and Beginning Cash $45,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
If previously discussed, date(s) of discussion:2017 Budget
001.000.62.558
001.000.62.558.60.41.00 Prof. Svcs
Carryforward
Total Expenses
Comments
001.000.308.00.000.00
At the end of 2017, $45,000 remains to complete the two-year project to develop
an Urban Forest Management Plan to provide the policy and implementation basis
for a sustainable approach to managing the city's urban forest. This request
moves forward the amount from 2017 into 2018 to complete the project.
Development Services
GENERALPlanningFund
Name:Urban Forest Management Plan
Shane Hope
6.8.a
Packet Pg. 169 Attachment: 2018 Carryforward Budget Amendment Ordinance (2018 Carryforward Budget Amendments)
EXHIBIT “E”: Carryforward Items for Council to Consider (February 2018)
16
Budget Amendment for:Carryforward Item
Item Description:
Department:
Division:
Title:
Preparer:
Department Account Number:
Budget Amendment Type?
What is the nature of the expenditure?One-Time
Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital?Operating
Fill In Item Description[s]
Baseline
Budget 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
0 20,000 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
Sub-Total $0 $20,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
$20,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
Revenue and Beginning Cash 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Beginning Cash: Carryforward 2,000 0 0 0 0
Beginning Cash: Carryforward 18,000 0 0 0 0
Grants/Contributions 0 0 0 0 0
General Fund Subsidy 0 0 0 0 0
New Revenue 0 0 0 0 0
Other 0 0 0 0 0
Total Revenue and Beginning Cash $20,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
Carryforward from 2017 to 2018 budget for expenditures not completed in 2017.
Parks had an abandoned boat at Marina Beach Park in the off leash area. Staff
worked with DNR to establish custody and remove the boat. The boat has been
removed and is being stored pending the establishment of ownership. We are now
waiting the period of appeal before we can have the boat destroyed. We will submit
this to DNR for a 90% reimbursement.
Once DNR reimburses the City, DNR will pursue owner for boat removal costs.
Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services
GENERALParks Maintenance Fund
Name:Boat Removal
Cynthia Cruz for Carrie Hite
Total Expenses
001.000.64.576.80.41.00
Carryforward
If previously discussed, date(s) of discussion:11/28/17 4th Quarter 2017 Budget Amendment
Professional Services 001.000.64.576.80.41.00
Comments
001.000.308.00.000.00
001.000.334.00.000.00
6.8.a
Packet Pg. 170 Attachment: 2018 Carryforward Budget Amendment Ordinance (2018 Carryforward Budget Amendments)
EXHIBIT “E”: Carryforward Items for Council to Consider (February 2018)
17
Budget Amendment for:Carryforward Item
Item Description:
Department:
Division:
Title:
Preparer:
Department Account Number:
Budget Amendment Type?
What is the nature of the expenditure?One-Time
Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital?Operating
Fill In Item Description[s]
Baseline
Budget 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
4,000 1,412 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
Sub-Total $4,000 $1,412 $0 $0 $0 $0
$5,412 $0 $0 $0 $0
Revenue and Beginning Cash 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Beginning Cash: Carryforward 1,412 0 0 0 0
Beginning Cash: Carryforward 0 0 0 0 0
Grants/Contributions 0 0 0 0 0
General Fund Subsidy 0 0 0 0 0
New Revenue 0 0 0 0 0
Other 0 0 0 0 0
Total Revenue and Beginning Cash $1,412 $0 $0 $0 $0
Comments
117.100.308.40.000.00
Total Expenses
117.100.64.573.20.41.40
A portion of funds from lodging tax allocated to the 117 Arts Fund which were
budgeted for tourism promotion in 2017 but won't be expended until 2018.
Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services
MUNICIPAL ARTSCultural Services Fund
Name:Tourism Promotion
Cynthia Cruz for Frances Chapin
117.100.64.573.20.41.40
Carryforward
If previously discussed, date(s) of discussion:2017 Budget
6.8.a
Packet Pg. 171 Attachment: 2018 Carryforward Budget Amendment Ordinance (2018 Carryforward Budget Amendments)
EXHIBIT “E”: Carryforward Items for Council to Consider (February 2018)
18
Budget Amendment for:Carryforward Item
Item Description:
Department:
Division:
Title:
Preparer:
Department Account Number:
Budget Amendment Type?
What is the nature of the expenditure?One-Time
Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital?Capital
Fill In Item Description[s]
Baseline
Budget 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
0 40,000 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
Sub-Total $0 $40,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
$40,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
Revenue and Beginning Cash 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Beginning Cash: Carryforward 40,000 0 0 0 0
Beginning Cash: Carryforward 0 0 0 0 0
Grants/Contributions 0 0 0 0 0
General Fund Subsidy 0 0 0 0 0
New Revenue 0 0 0 0 0
Other 0 0 0 0 0
Total Revenue and Beginning Cash $40,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
Gateway Sign Replacement Project carryforward from 2017 to 2018 budget for
design, fabrication and installation expenditures not completed in 2017. A staff and
citizen committee has been working with artist/designer Clayton Moss on the entry
way sign to Edmonds. They will be to Council soon with some designs.
Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services
REET 2ParksFund
Name:Gateway Replacement
Cynthia Cruz for Carrie Hite
Total Expenses
125.000.64.594.76.65.00
Carryforward
If previously discussed, date(s) of discussion:2017 Budget
Projects 125.000.64.594.76.65.00
Comments
125.000.308.30.000.00
6.8.a
Packet Pg. 172 Attachment: 2018 Carryforward Budget Amendment Ordinance (2018 Carryforward Budget Amendments)
EXHIBIT “E”: Carryforward Items for Council to Consider (February 2018)
19
Budget Amendment for:Carryforward Item
Item Description:
Department:
Division:
Title:
Preparer:
Department Account Number:
Budget Amendment Type?
What is the nature of the expenditure?One-Time
Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital?Capital
Fill In Item Description[s]
Baseline
Budget 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
0 23,747 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
Sub-Total $0 $23,747 $0 $0 $0 $0
$23,747 $0 $0 $0 $0
Revenue and Beginning Cash 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Beginning Cash: Carryforward 23,747 0 0 0 0
Beginning Cash: Carryforward 0 0 0 0 0
Grants/Contributions 0 0 0 0 0
General Fund Subsidy 0 0 0 0 0
New Revenue 0 0 0 0 0
Other 0 0 0 0 0
Total Revenue and Beginning Cash $23,747 $0 $0 $0 $0
Carryforward from 2017 to 2018 budget for expenditures not completed in 2017
($115,000 less expenditures of $91,252.85). We are in the middle of a some work in
the lockerroom and are carrying this over to complete it. We received donated new
lockers and will be replacing the tile, partitions, lockers and painting the walls and
flooring.
Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services
REET 2ParksFund
Name:Yost Pool Improvements
Cynthia Cruz for Carrie Hite
Total Expenses
125.000.64.594.75.65.00
Carryforward
If previously discussed, date(s) of discussion:2017 Budget
Projects 125.000.64.594.75.65.00
Comments
125.000.308.30.000.00
6.8.a
Packet Pg. 173 Attachment: 2018 Carryforward Budget Amendment Ordinance (2018 Carryforward Budget Amendments)
EXHIBIT “E”: Carryforward Items for Council to Consider (February 2018)
20
Budget Amendment for:Carryforward Item
Item Description:
Department:
Division:
Title:
Preparer:
Department Account Number:
Budget Amendment Type?
What is the nature of the expenditure?One-Time
Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital?Capital
Fill In Item Description[s]
Baseline
Budget 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
0 25,000 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
Sub-Total $0 $25,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
$25,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
Revenue and Beginning Cash 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Beginning Cash: Carryforward 25,000 0 0 0 0
Beginning Cash: Carryforward 0 0 0 0 0
Grants/Contributions 0 0 0 0 0
General Fund Subsidy 0 0 0 0 0
New Revenue 0 0 0 0 0
Other 0 0 0 0 0
Total Revenue and Beginning Cash $25,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
Carryforward from 2017 to 2018 budget for expenditures not completed in 2017.
Parks has been waiting for the PW project at Seaview Park in order to complete the
tennis court resurfacing and striping.
Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services
REET 2ParksFund
Name:Seaview Park
Cynthia Cruz for Carrie Hite
Total Expenses
125.000.64.594.76.65.00
Carryforward
If previously discussed, date(s) of discussion:2017 Budget
Projects 125.000.64.594.76.65.00
Comments
125.000.308.30.000.00
6.8.a
Packet Pg. 174 Attachment: 2018 Carryforward Budget Amendment Ordinance (2018 Carryforward Budget Amendments)
EXHIBIT “E”: Carryforward Items for Council to Consider (February 2018)
21
Budget Amendment for:Carryforward Item
Item Description:
Department:
Division:
Title:
Preparer:
Department Account Number:
Budget Amendment Type?
What is the nature of the expenditure?One-Time
Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital?Capital
Fill In Item Description[s]
Baseline
Budget 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
0 10,000 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
Sub-Total $0 $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
$10,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
Revenue and Beginning Cash 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Beginning Cash: Carryforward 10,000 0 0 0 0
Beginning Cash: Carryforward 0 0 0 0 0
Grants/Contributions 0 0 0 0 0
General Fund Subsidy 0 0 0 0 0
New Revenue 0 0 0 0 0
Other 0 0 0 0 0
Total Revenue and Beginning Cash $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
Carryforward from 2017 to 2018 budget for expenditures not completed in 2017.
Staff anticipated spending this $10,000 on the planning and design of the garden.
When this item was pulled from the Council Committee conversation, we put this
effort on hold and did not spend this $10,000 for the plan/design. Staff have been in
touch with a private land owner that may be interested in donating her land. Staff
also would like to discuss with Council the possibility of continuing efforts to
establish a community garden at Esperance Park.
Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services
REET 2ParksFund
Name:Community Garden
Cynthia Cruz for Carrie Hite
Total Expenses
125.000.64.594.76.65.00
Carryforward
If previously discussed, date(s) of discussion:2017 Budget
Projects 125.000.64.594.76.65.00
Comments
125.000.308.30.000.00
6.8.a
Packet Pg. 175 Attachment: 2018 Carryforward Budget Amendment Ordinance (2018 Carryforward Budget Amendments)
EXHIBIT “E”: Carryforward Items for Council to Consider (February 2018)
22
Budget Amendment for:Carryforward Item
Item Description:
Department:
Division:
Title:
Preparer:
Department Account Number:
Budget Amendment Type?
What is the nature of the expenditure?One-Time
Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital?Capital
Fill In Item Description[s]
Baseline
Budget 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
0 20,000 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
Sub-Total $0 $20,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
$20,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
Revenue and Beginning Cash 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Beginning Cash: Carryforward 20,000 0 0 0 0
Beginning Cash: Carryforward 0 0 0 0 0
Grants/Contributions 0 0 0 0 0
General Fund Subsidy 0 0 0 0 0
New Revenue 0 0 0 0 0
Other 0 0 0 0 0
Total Revenue and Beginning Cash $20,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
Carryforward from 2017 to 2018 budget for expenditures not completed in 2017. We
were not able to complete this work before the weather window in 2017. We are in
the process now of replacing 5 of our older flower poles downtown.
Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services
REET 2ParksFund
Name:Flower Pole Replacement
Cynthia Cruz for Carrie Hite
Total Expenses
125.000.64.594.76.65.00
Carryforward
If previously discussed, date(s) of discussion:2017 Budget
Projects 125.000.64.594.76.65.00
Comments
125.000.308.30.000.00
6.8.a
Packet Pg. 176 Attachment: 2018 Carryforward Budget Amendment Ordinance (2018 Carryforward Budget Amendments)
EXHIBIT “E”: Carryforward Items for Council to Consider (February 2018)
23
Budget Amendment for:Carryforward Item
Item Description:
Department:
Division:
Title:
Preparer:
Department Account Number:
Budget Amendment Type?
What is the nature of the expenditure?One-Time
Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital?Capital
Fill In Item Description[s]
Baseline
Budget 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
0 72,300 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
Sub-Total $0 $72,300 $0 $0 $0 $0
$72,300 $0 $0 $0 $0
Revenue and Beginning Cash 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Beginning Cash: Carryforward 72,300 0 0 0 0
Beginning Cash: Carryforward 0 0 0 0 0
Grants/Contributions 0 0 0 0 0
General Fund Subsidy 0 0 0 0 0
New Revenue 0 0 0 0 0
Other 0 0 0 0 0
Total Revenue and Beginning Cash $72,300 $0 $0 $0 $0
Carryforward from 2017 to 2018 budget for expenditures not completed in 2017.
Staff did not want to proceed with the stadium demo in December of 2017 because of
the disturbance to residents during the holiday season. We spent some funds in
2017 on the demo plan and permitting. The remainder is being carried over for
expenditure in 2018.
Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services
REET 2ParksFund
Name:Civic Stadium Demo
Cynthia Cruz for Carrie Hite
Total Expenses
125.000.64.594.76.65.00
Carryforward
If previously discussed, date(s) of discussion:2017 Budget
Projects 125.000.64.594.76.65.00
Comments
125.000.308.30.000.00
6.8.a
Packet Pg. 177 Attachment: 2018 Carryforward Budget Amendment Ordinance (2018 Carryforward Budget Amendments)
EXHIBIT “E”: Carryforward Items for Council to Consider (February 2018)
24
Budget Amendment for:Carryforward Item
Item Description:
Department:
Division:
Title:
Preparer:
Department Account Number:
Budget Amendment Type?
What is the nature of the expenditure?One-Time
Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital?Capital
Fill In Item Description[s]
Baseline
Budget 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
0 68,913 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
Sub-Total $0 $68,913 $0 $0 $0 $0
$68,913 $0 $0 $0 $0
Revenue and Beginning Cash 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Beginning Cash: Carryforward 68,913 0 0 0 0
Beginning Cash: Carryforward 0 0 0 0 0
Grants/Contributions 0 0 0 0 0
General Fund Subsidy 0 0 0 0 0
New Revenue 0 0 0 0 0
Other 0 0 0 0 0
Total Revenue and Beginning Cash $68,913 $0 $0 $0 $0
Carryforward from 2017 to 2018 budget for expenditures not completed in 2017. The
Council approved the PSA for Barker Landscape to complete the design for this
project. This is for the permitting and design of the waterfront walkway project in
front of the new Waterfront Center. This is the amount I projected to spend in
2017, but was not spent.
Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services
REET 2ParksFund
Name:Senior Center/Ebb Tide Walkway
Cynthia Cruz for Carrie Hite
Total Expenses
125.000.64.594.76.65.00
Carryforward
If previously discussed, date(s) of discussion:2017 Budget
Projects 125.000.64.594.76.65.00
Comments
125.000.308.30.000.00
6.8.a
Packet Pg. 178 Attachment: 2018 Carryforward Budget Amendment Ordinance (2018 Carryforward Budget Amendments)
EXHIBIT “E”: Carryforward Items for Council to Consider (February 2018)
25
Budget Amendment for:Carryforward Item
Item Description:
Department:
Division:
Title:
Preparer:
Department Account Number:
Budget Amendment Type?
What is the nature of the expenditure?One-Time
Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital?Capital
Fill In Item Description[s]
Baseline
Budget 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
0 41,000 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
Sub-Total $0 $41,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
$41,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
Revenue and Beginning Cash 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Beginning Cash: Carryforward 41,000 0 0 0 0
Beginning Cash: Carryforward 0 0 0 0 0
Grants/Contributions 0 0 0 0 0
General Fund Subsidy 0 0 0 0 0
New Revenue 0 0 0 0 0
Other 0 0 0 0 0
Total Revenue and Beginning Cash $41,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
Carryforward from 2017 to 2018 budget for expenditures not completed in 2017.
This amount was already approved by Council in 2017, and is for the electrical work.
This has not been expended yet, but the electrical contractor is set to start in the
next few weeks.
Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services
REET 2ParksFund
Name:Veterans Plaza
Cynthia Cruz for Carrie Hite
Total Expenses
125.000.64.594.76.65.00
Carryforward
If previously discussed, date(s) of discussion:10/10/17 3rd Quarter 2017 Budget Amendment
Projects 125.000.64.594.76.65.00
Comments
125.000.308.30.000.00
6.8.a
Packet Pg. 179 Attachment: 2018 Carryforward Budget Amendment Ordinance (2018 Carryforward Budget Amendments)
EXHIBIT “E”: Carryforward Items for Council to Consider (February 2018)
26
Budget Amendment for:Carryforward Item
Item Description:
Department:
Division:
Title:
Preparer:
Department Account Number:
Budget Amendment Type?
What is the nature of the expenditure?One-Time
Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital?Operating
Fill In Item Description[s]
Baseline
Budget 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
0 15,995 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
Sub-Total $0 $15,995 $0 $0 $0 $0
$15,995 $0 $0 $0 $0
Revenue and Beginning Cash 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Beginning Cash: Carryforward 15,995 0 0 0 0
Beginning Cash: Carryforward 0 0 0 0 0
Grants/Contributions 0 0 0 0 0
General Fund Subsidy 0 0 0 0 0
New Revenue 0 0 0 0 0
Other 0 0 0 0 0
Total Revenue and Beginning Cash $15,995 $0 $0 $0 $0
If previously discussed, date(s) of discussion:10/10/17 3rd Quarter 2017 Budget Amendment
130.000.64.536.50.31.00
Software
Carryforward
Total Expenses
Comments
130.000.308.40.000.00
Carryforward from 2017 to 2018 budget for expenditures not completed in 2017, ($17,500 -
$1,505 paid to date). Software to manage the Cemetery plots, sales, burials, create an online
presence and search funcationality, and utilize the information generated by the WWU
sustainability project. This will create an efficient, user friendly database complete with a
web interface. $17,500 is the one-time expense for the purchase of software and there will be
an ongoing expense of $2,000 for yearly maintenance costs. $8,927 of funds come from funds
left over from the WWU sustainability initiative, with the remainder coming from the general
fund.
Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services CEMETERY
MAINTENANCE/
IMPROVEMENT
Parks Fund
Name:Cemetery Software
Ccruz for Carrie Hite
6.8.a
Packet Pg. 180 Attachment: 2018 Carryforward Budget Amendment Ordinance (2018 Carryforward Budget Amendments)
EXHIBIT “E”: Carryforward Items for Council to Consider (February 2018)
27
Budget Amendment for:Carryforward Item
Item Description:
Department:
Division:
Title:
Preparer:
Department Account Number:
Budget Amendment Type?
What is the nature of the expenditure?One-Time
Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital?Capital
Fill In Item Description[s]
Baseline
Budget 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
0 35,000 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
Sub-Total $0 $35,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
$35,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
Revenue and Beginning Cash 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Beginning Cash: Carryforward 35,000 0 0 0 0
Beginning Cash: Carryforward 0 0 0 0 0
Grants/Contributions 0 0 0 0 0
General Fund Subsidy 0 0 0 0 0
New Revenue 0 0 0 0 0
Other 0 0 0 0 0
Total Revenue and Beginning Cash $35,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
Carryforward from 2017 to 2018 budget for expenditures not completed in 2017.
Staff did not want to proceed with the stadium demo in December of 2017 because of
the disturbance to residents during the holiday season. We spent some funds in
2017 on the demo plan and permitting. The remainder is being carried over for
expenditure in 2018. This particular request is for the remainder of the RCO grant,
so this amount wil be reimbursed.
Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services
PARKS
CONSTRUCTION
Parks Fund
Name:Civic Stadium Demo
Cynthia Cruz for Carrie Hite
Total Expenses
332.000.64.594.76.65.00
Carryforward
If previously discussed, date(s) of discussion:2017 Budget
Projects 332.000.64.594.76.65.00
Comments
332.000.308.30.000.00
6.8.a
Packet Pg. 181 Attachment: 2018 Carryforward Budget Amendment Ordinance (2018 Carryforward Budget Amendments)
EXHIBIT “E”: Carryforward Items for Council to Consider (February 2018)
28
Budget Amendment for:Carryforward Item
Item Description:
Department:
Division:
Title:
Preparer:
Department Account Number:
Budget Amendment Type?
What is the nature of the expenditure?One-Time
Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital?Capital
Fill In Item Description[s]
Baseline
Budget 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
0 2,278 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
Sub-Total $0 $2,278 $0 $0 $0 $0
$2,278 $0 $0 $0 $0
Revenue and Beginning Cash 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Beginning Cash: Carryforward 2,278 0 0 0 0
Beginning Cash: Carryforward 0 0 0 0 0
Grants/Contributions 0 0 0 0 0
General Fund Subsidy 0 0 0 0 0
New Revenue 0 0 0 0 0
Other 0 0 0 0 0
Total Revenue and Beginning Cash $2,278 $0 $0 $0 $0
Carryforward from 2017 to 2018 budget for expenditures not completed in 2017.
This amount was already approved by Council in 2017, and is for the remaining
punch list items. This has not been expended yet, but this should be completed in
Q1.
Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services
PARKS
CONSTRUCTION
Parks Fund
Name:Veterans Plaza
Cynthia Cruz for Carrie Hite
Total Expenses
332.000.64.594.76.65.00
Carryforward
If previously discussed, date(s) of discussion:2017 Budget
Projects 332.000.64.594.76.65.00
Comments
332.000.308.30.000.00
6.8.a
Packet Pg. 182 Attachment: 2018 Carryforward Budget Amendment Ordinance (2018 Carryforward Budget Amendments)
EXHIBIT “E”: Carryforward Items for Council to Consider (February 2018)
29
Budget Amendment for:Carryforward Item
Item Description:
Department:
Division:
Title:
Preparer:
Department Account Number:
Budget Amendment Type?
What is the nature of the expenditure?One-Time
Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital?Capital
Fill In Item Description[s]
Baseline
Budget 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
0 127,443 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
Sub-Total $0 $127,443 $0 $0 $0 $0
$127,443 $0 $0 $0 $0
Revenue and Beginning Cash 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Beginning Cash: Carryforward 127,443 0 0 0 0
Beginning Cash: Carryforward 0 0 0 0 0
Grants/Contributions 0 0 0 0 0
General Fund Subsidy 0 0 0 0 0
New Revenue 0 0 0 0 0
Other 0 0 0 0 0
Total Revenue and Beginning Cash $127,443 $0 $0 $0 $0
Projects 332.000.64.594.76.65.00
Carryforward from 2017 to 2018 budget for expenditures not completed in 2017.
This $127,443 is the remainder in the Fishing Pier budget that will be reimbursed
from WDFW. Razz Construction will be mobilizing after the weather window (
approx March) to complete repairs on the center joint.
Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services
PARKS
CONSTRUCTION
Parks Fund
Name:Fishing Pier
Cynthia Cruz for Carrie Hite
332.000.64.594.76.65.00
Carryforward
If previously discussed, date(s) of discussion:10/17/17 and 11/28/17 4th Quarter 2017 Budget Amendment
Comments
332.000.334.02.500.00
Total Expenses
6.8.a
Packet Pg. 183 Attachment: 2018 Carryforward Budget Amendment Ordinance (2018 Carryforward Budget Amendments)
EXHIBIT “E”: Carryforward Items for Council to Consider (February 2018)
30
Budget Amendment for:Carryforward Item
Item Description:
Department:
Division:
Title:
Preparer:
Department Account Number:
Budget Amendment Type?
What is the nature of the expenditure?One-Time
Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital?Capital
Fill In Item Description[s]
Baseline
Budget 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
1,000 9,450 0 0 0 0
5,500 179,564 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
Sub-Total $6,500 $189,014 $0 $0 $0 $0
$195,514 $0 $0 $0 $0
Revenue and Beginning Cash 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Beginning Cash: Carryforward 0 0 0 0 0
Beginning Cash: Carryforward 0 0 0 0 0
Grants/Contributions 163,308 0 0 0 0
Grants/Contributions 25,706 0 0 0 0
New Revenue 0 0 0 0 0
Other 0 0 0 0 0
Total Revenue and Beginning Cash $189,014 $0 $0 $0 $0
Comments
Vrdnt-112.000.333.20.205.14
TIB-112.000.337.20.000.00
Total Expenses
c474/E5DA
Carryforward
If previously discussed, date(s) of discussion:
Interfund Serv Rdwy - 112.000.68.542.33.41.67
Construction Projects - 112.000.68.595.33.65.00
The project wayfinding signs have been installed. The remaining work that will be
paid in 2018 includes catch basin retrofits and remaining paint striping and
thermoplastic pavement markings.
Public Works
STREETEngineeringFund
Name:Bike2Health
Bertrand Hauss
6.8.a
Packet Pg. 184 Attachment: 2018 Carryforward Budget Amendment Ordinance (2018 Carryforward Budget Amendments)
EXHIBIT “E”: Carryforward Items for Council to Consider (February 2018)
31
Budget Amendment for:Carryforward Item
Item Description:
Department:
Division:
Title:
Preparer:
Department Account Number:
Budget Amendment Type?
What is the nature of the expenditure?One-Time
Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital?Capital
Fill In Item Description[s]
Baseline
Budget 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
9,655 5,000 0 0 0 0
125,000 58,342 0 0 0 0
25,000 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
Sub-Total $159,655 $63,342 $0 $0 $0 $0
$222,997 $0 $0 $0 $0
Revenue and Beginning Cash 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Beginning Cash: Carryforward 0 0 0 0 0
Beginning Cash: Carryforward 0 0 0 0 0
Grants/Contributions 63,342 0 0 0 0
General Fund Subsidy 0 0 0 0 0
New Revenue 0 0 0 0 0
Other 0 0 0 0 0
Total Revenue and Beginning Cash $63,342 $0 $0 $0 $0
Comments
112.000.333.10.000.00
Total Expenses
Interfund Serv Rdwy- 112.000.68.542.33.41.67
Professional Serv Rdwy- 112.000.68.595.33.65.41
Intangible Rights to Land-112.000.68.595.20.61.00
The project wayfinding signs have been installed. The remaining work that will be
paid in 2018 includes catch basin retrofits and remaining paint striping and
thermoplastic pavement markings.
Public Works
STREETEngineeringFund
Name:Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Improvements
Bertrand Hauss
i026/E7DC
Carryforward
If previously discussed, date(s) of discussion:
6.8.a
Packet Pg. 185 Attachment: 2018 Carryforward Budget Amendment Ordinance (2018 Carryforward Budget Amendments)
EXHIBIT “E”: Carryforward Items for Council to Consider (February 2018)
32
Budget Amendment for:Carryforward Item
Item Description:
Department:
Division:
Title:
Preparer:
Department Account Number:
Budget Amendment Type?
What is the nature of the expenditure?One-Time
Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital?Capital
Fill In Item Description[s]
Baseline
Budget 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
5,000 20,910 0 0 0 0
40,000 10,455 0 0 0 0
251,000 386,826 0 0 0 0
0 8,660 0 0 0 0
0 1,730 0 0 0 0
0 162,844 0 0 0 0
0 10,480 0 0 0 0
0 2,090 0 0 0 0
0 196,958 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
Sub-Total $296,000 $800,953 $0 $0 $0 $0
$1,096,953 $0 $0 $0 $0
Revenue and Beginning Cash 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Beginning Cash: Carryforward 50,000 0 0 0 0
Beginning Cash: Carryforward 173,234 0 0 0 0
Beginning Cash: Carryforward 209,528 0 0 0 0
Beginning Cash: Carryforward 0 0 0 0 0
Fed Grant 220,915 0 0 0 0
TIB Grant 147,276 0 0 0 0
Total Revenue and Beginning Cash $800,953 $0 $0 $0 $0
c368/E1CA
Interfund Serv 112.000.68.542.33.41.67
112.000.333.20.205.14
The project is nearly completed and the remaining work in 2018 includes completing
the traffic signal, property restoration, final pavement overlay, paint striping and
miscellaneous close-out work.
Public Works
STREET
CONSTRUCTION
Engineering Fund
Name:76th Ave & 212th St Intersection Improvements
Rob English
If previously discussed, date(s) of discussion:
Carryforward
Cap Prof Serv 112.000.68.595.33.65.41
Construction 112.000.68.595.33.65.00
Construction 423.200.75.594.35.65.00
Intefund Serv 421.000.74.534.80.41.67
Cap Prof Serv 421.000.74.594.34.65.41
Construction 421.000.74.594.34.65.10
Interfund Serv 423.200.75.535.35.41.67
Cap Prof Serv 423.200.75.594.35.65.41
Total Expenses
Comments
112.000.308.30.000.00
423.200.308.30.000.00
112.000.333.20.205.09
421.000.308.00.000.00
6.8.a
Packet Pg. 186 Attachment: 2018 Carryforward Budget Amendment Ordinance (2018 Carryforward Budget Amendments)
EXHIBIT “E”: Carryforward Items for Council to Consider (February 2018)
33
Budget Amendment for:Carryforward Item
Item Description:
Department:
Division:
Title:
Preparer:
Department Account Number:
Budget Amendment Type?
What is the nature of the expenditure?One-Time
Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital?Capital
Fill In Item Description[s]
Baseline
Budget 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
0 39,000 0 0 0 0
0 5,000 0 0 0 0
0 6,277 0 0 0 0
0 288,723 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
Sub-Total $0 $339,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
$339,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
Revenue and Beginning Cash 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Beginning Cash: Carryforward 39,000 0 0 0 0
Beginning Cash: Carryforward 300,000 0 0 0 0
Beginning Cash: Carryforward (39,000)0 0 0 0
General Fund Subsidy 39,000 0 0 0 0
New Revenue 0 0 0 0 0
Other 0 0 0 0 0
Total Revenue and Beginning Cash $339,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
Professional Serv Rdwy - 126.000.68.595.33.65.41
Carryforward
City staff is working on the final design issues and permitting with BNSF.
Construction will be completed in 2018.
Public Works
REET 1EngineeringFund
Name:Trackside Warning System
Bertrand Hauss
c470/E5AA
Interfund Serv Rdwy - 126.000.68.542.30.41.67
Interfund Transfer 001.000.39.597.42.55.12
If previously discussed, date(s) of discussion:
Construction Rdwy126.000.68.595.33.65.00
Total Expenses
Comments
001.000.308.00.000.00
126.000.308.30.000.00
112.000.308.30.000.00
112.000.397.95.001.00
6.8.a
Packet Pg. 187 Attachment: 2018 Carryforward Budget Amendment Ordinance (2018 Carryforward Budget Amendments)
EXHIBIT “E”: Carryforward Items for Council to Consider (February 2018)
34
Budget Amendment for:Carryforward Item
Item Description:
Department:
Division:
Title:
Preparer:
Department Account Number:
Budget Amendment Type?
What is the nature of the expenditure?One-Time
Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital?Capital
Fill In Item Description[s]
Baseline
Budget 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
1,000 2,000 0 0 0 0
4,000 7,762 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
Sub-Total $5,000 $9,762 $0 $0 $0 $0
$14,762 $0 $0 $0 $0
Revenue and Beginning Cash 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Beginning Cash: Carryforward 9,762 0 0 0 0
Beginning Cash: Carryforward 0 0 0 0 0
Grants/Contributions 0 0 0 0 0
General Fund Subsidy 0 0 0 0 0
New Revenue 0 0 0 0 0
Other 0 0 0 0 0
Total Revenue and Beginning Cash $9,762 $0 $0 $0 $0
Comments
126.000.308.30.000.00
Total Expenses
Interfund Serv Rdwy- 126.000.68.542.30.41.67
Repair&Maint Overlays 126.000.68.542.30.48.00
All upgrades to the intersections programmed in 2017 have been completed and
were under-budget. Another location (Hwy. 99 @ 216th St. SW) has been
identified in 2018 and the carryforward will be used to complete the conversion.
Public Works
REET 1EngineeringFund
Name:Protected / Permissive Signal Conversion
Bertrand Hauss
i015/E6AB
Carryforward
If previously discussed, date(s) of discussion:
6.8.a
Packet Pg. 188 Attachment: 2018 Carryforward Budget Amendment Ordinance (2018 Carryforward Budget Amendments)
EXHIBIT “E”: Carryforward Items for Council to Consider (February 2018)
35
Budget Amendment for:Carryforward Item
Item Description:
Department:
Division:
Title:
Preparer:
Department Account Number:
Budget Amendment Type?
What is the nature of the expenditure?One-Time
Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital?Capital
Fill In Item Description[s]
Baseline
Budget 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
5,000 0 0 0 0 0
32,000 5,000 0 0 0 0
5,000 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
Sub-Total $42,000 $5,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
$47,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
Revenue and Beginning Cash 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Beginning Cash: Carryforward 5,000 0 0 0 0
Beginning Cash: Carryforward 0 0 0 0 0
Grants/Contributions 0 0 0 0 0
General Fund Subsidy 0 0 0 0 0
New Revenue 0 0 0 0 0
Other 0 0 0 0 0
Total Revenue and Beginning Cash $5,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
Comments
126.000.308.30.000.00
Total Expenses
Interfund Serv Rdwy - 126.000.68.542.30.41.67
Construction Rdwy - 126.000.68.595.33.65.00
Professional Serv Rdwy-126.000.68.595.33.65.41
The 90% design plans are close to being completed. The design phase has taken
longer due to WSDOT's review on the coordination with the signals at the I-5
interchage. Construction is scheduled in 2018.
Public Works
REET 1EngineeringFund
Name:220th St. SW Signal Coordination from Hwy. 99 to 76th
Bertrand Hauss
i028/E8AB
Carryforward
If previously discussed, date(s) of discussion:
6.8.a
Packet Pg. 189 Attachment: 2018 Carryforward Budget Amendment Ordinance (2018 Carryforward Budget Amendments)
EXHIBIT “E”: Carryforward Items for Council to Consider (February 2018)
36
Budget Amendment for:Carryforward Item
Item Description:
Department:
Division:
Title:
Preparer:
Department Account Number:
Budget Amendment Type?
What is the nature of the expenditure?One-Time
Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital?Capital
Fill In Item Description[s]
Baseline
Budget 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
126.000.68.542.30.41.67 Interfund Services 15,000 0 0 0 0 0
126.000.68.595.33.65.41 Professional Services 10,000 0 0 0 0 0
100,000 3,600 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
Sub-Total $125,000 $3,600 $0 $0 $0 $0
$128,600 $0 $0 $0 $0
Revenue and Beginning Cash 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Beginning Cash: Carryforward 3,600 0 0 0 0
Beginning Cash: Carryforward 0 0 0 0 0
Grants/Contributions 0 0 0 0 0
General Fund Subsidy 0 0 0 0 0
New Revenue 0 0 0 0 0
Other 0 0 0 0 0
Total Revenue and Beginning Cash $3,600 $0 $0 $0 $0
Comments
126.000.308.30.000.00
Total Expenses
126.000.68.595.33.65.00 Construction
In-house design deallyed due to change in Surface Water Engineer position. The
design phase is underway and the project will be advertised for construction bids
by spring 2018.
Public Works
REET 1EngineeringFund
Name:89th Retaining Wall
Zachary Richardson
E7CD / i025
Carryforward
If previously discussed, date(s) of discussion:
6.8.a
Packet Pg. 190 Attachment: 2018 Carryforward Budget Amendment Ordinance (2018 Carryforward Budget Amendments)
EXHIBIT “E”: Carryforward Items for Council to Consider (February 2018)
37
Budget Amendment for:Carryforward Item
Item Description:
Department:
Division:
Title:
Preparer:
Department Account Number:
Budget Amendment Type?
What is the nature of the expenditure?One-Time
Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital?Capital
Fill In Item Description[s]
Baseline
Budget 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
50,000 22,000 0 0 0 0
600,000 420,000 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
Sub-Total $650,000 $442,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
$1,092,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
Revenue and Beginning Cash 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Beginning Cash: Carryforward 442,000 0 0 0 0
Beginning Cash: Carryforward 0 0 0 0 0
Grants/Contributions 0 0 0 0 0
General Fund Subsidy 0 0 0 0 0
New Revenue 0 0 0 0 0
Other 0 0 0 0 0
Total Revenue and Beginning Cash $442,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
Interfund Serv Overlays-126.000.68.542.30.41.67
Repair&Maint Overlays 126.000.68.542.30.48.00
It was estimated going into the 2017 construction program with the County Paving
Contract that the City would expend about 1.65M, but only about 1.2M worth of
improvements were installed. City staff became aware of the shortfall after
project completion when the County submitted invoices for payment. This amount
is the remaining balance from the 2017 Pavement Preservation Program.
Public Works
REET 1EngineeringFund
Name:Pavement Preservation Program
Rob English
i030/E8CB
Carryforward
If previously discussed, date(s) of discussion:
Comments
126.000.308.30.000.00
Total Expenses
6.8.a
Packet Pg. 191 Attachment: 2018 Carryforward Budget Amendment Ordinance (2018 Carryforward Budget Amendments)
EXHIBIT “E”: Carryforward Items for Council to Consider (February 2018)
38
Budget Amendment for:Carryforward Item
Item Description:
Department:
Division:
Title:
Preparer:
Department Account Number:
Budget Amendment Type?
What is the nature of the expenditure?One-Time
Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital?Capital
Fill In Item Description[s]
Baseline
Budget 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
2,500 2,500 0 0 0 0
Professional Serv Rdwy-126.000.68.595.33.65.41 25,000 20,000 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
5,000 5,958 0 0 0 0
65,250 20,000 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
5,000 5,593 0 0 0 0
65,250 22,000 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
5,000 0 0 0 0 0
65,250 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
Sub-Total $210,750 $76,051 $0 $0 $0 $0
$286,801 $0 $0 $0 $0
Revenue and Beginning Cash 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Beginning Cash: Carryforward 22,500 0 0 0 0
Beginning Cash: Carryforward 25,958 0 0 0 0
Beginning Cash: Carryforward 27,593 0 0 0 0
Other 0 0 0 0 0
Total Revenue and Beginning Cash $76,051 $0 $0 $0 $0
Construction 423.200.75.594.35.65.00
If previously discussed, date(s) of discussion:
Prof Serv (Storm)422.000.72.594.31.65.41
Construction(Storm)422.000.72.594.31.65.20
Interfund Serv Rdwy - 126.000.68.542.30.41.67
Total Expenses
Comments
421.000.308.00.000.00
422.000.308.00.000.00
126.000.308.30.000.00
Unspent Design Phase funds in 2017 moved to 2018. Design is expected to be
complete by winter 2018.
Public Works
WATER Engineering Fund
Name:Dayton 3rd to 9th Utility Replacement
Michele (Mike) De Lilla
E5JB/c482
Interfund Services (Water)421.000.74.534.34.41.67
Professional Services 423.200.75.594.35.65.41
Carryforward
Professional Services (Water)421.000.74.594.34.65.41
Construction(Water)421.000.74.594.34.65.10
Construction Rdwy - 126.000.68.595.33.65.00
Interfund Services 423.200.75.535.35.41.67
Interfund Services (Storm)422.000.72.531.31.41.67
6.8.a
Packet Pg. 192 Attachment: 2018 Carryforward Budget Amendment Ordinance (2018 Carryforward Budget Amendments)
EXHIBIT “E”: Carryforward Items for Council to Consider (February 2018)
39
Budget Amendment for:Carryforward Item
Item Description:
Department:
Division:
Title:
Preparer:
Department Account Number:
Budget Amendment Type?
What is the nature of the expenditure?One-Time
Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital?Operating
Fill In Item Description[s]
Baseline
Budget 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
0 1,500 0 0 0 0
0 1,500 0 0 0 0
0 1,500 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
Sub-Total $0 $4,500 $0 $0 $0 $0
$4,500 $0 $0 $0 $0
Revenue and Beginning Cash 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Beginning Cash: Carryforward 1,500 0 0 0 0
Beginning Cash: Carryforward 1,500 0 0 0 0
Grants/Contributions 1,500 0 0 0 0
General Fund Subsidy 0 0 0 0 0
New Revenue 0 0 0 0 0
Other 0 0 0 0 0
Total Revenue and Beginning Cash $4,500 $0 $0 $0 $0
Prof Serv Engr 421.000.74.534.80.41.10
Prof Serv Engr 422.000.72.531.90.41.20
Prof Serv Engr 423.000.75.535.80.41.30
The carryforward will program unspent utility funds from 2017 to complete the
update to the Engineering Standard Details.
Public Works
WATER Engineering Fund
Name:Engineering Standard Details Update
Rob English
s010/E5NA
Carryforward
If previously discussed, date(s) of discussion:
Comments
421.000.308.00.000.00
422.000.308.00.000.00
423.000.308.00.000.00
Total Expenses
6.8.a
Packet Pg. 193 Attachment: 2018 Carryforward Budget Amendment Ordinance (2018 Carryforward Budget Amendments)
EXHIBIT “E”: Carryforward Items for Council to Consider (February 2018)
40
Budget Amendment for:Carryforward Item
Item Description:
Department:
Division:
Title:
Preparer:
Department Account Number:
Budget Amendment Type?
What is the nature of the expenditure?One-Time
Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital?Capital
Fill In Item Description[s]
Baseline
Budget 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
15,000 30,000 0 0 0 0
20,000 40,000 0 0 0 0
17,000 724,118 0 0 0 0
1,000 1,000 0 0 0 0
2,000 1,804 0 0 0 0
0 57,000 0 0 0 0
Sub-Total $55,000 $853,922 $0 $0 $0 $0
$908,922 $0 $0 $0 $0
Revenue and Beginning Cash 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Beginning Cash: Carryforward 794,118 0 0 0 0
Beginning Cash: Carryforward 59,804 0 0 0 0
Grants/Contributions 0 0 0 0 0
General Fund Subsidy 0 0 0 0 0
New Revenue 0 0 0 0 0
Other 0 0 0 0 0
Total Revenue and Beginning Cash $853,922 $0 $0 $0 $0
Fund
Name:2017 Waterline Replacement Program
Ed Sibrel
Comments
421.000.308.00.000.00
422.000.308.00.000.00.
Construction time was underestimated for the project and will be complete by
February 2018. Unspent construction funding moved from 2017 to 2018.
Total Expenses
E6JB/i014
Carryforward
If previously discussed, date(s) of discussion:
Interfund Services (Water)421.000.74.534.34.41.67
Professional Services (Water)421.000.74.594.34.65.41
Construction(Water)421.000.74.594.34.65.10
Interfund Services (Storm)422.000.72.531.31.41.67
Prof Serv (Storm)422.000.72.594.31.65.41
Construction(Storm)422.000.72.594.31.65.20
Public Works
WATER Engineering
6.8.a
Packet Pg. 194 Attachment: 2018 Carryforward Budget Amendment Ordinance (2018 Carryforward Budget Amendments)
EXHIBIT “E”: Carryforward Items for Council to Consider (February 2018)
41
Budget Amendment for:Carryforward Item
Item Description:
Department:
Division:
Title:
Preparer:
Department Account Number:
Budget Amendment Type?
What is the nature of the expenditure?One-Time
Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital?Capital
Fill In Item Description[s]
Baseline
Budget 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
60,542 0 0 0 0 0
180,000 23,015 0 0 0 0
1,777,538 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
Sub-Total $2,018,080 $23,015 $0 $0 $0 $0
$2,041,095 $0 $0 $0 $0
Revenue and Beginning Cash 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Beginning Cash: Carryforward 23,015 0 0 0 0
Beginning Cash: Carryforward 0 0 0 0 0
Grants/Contributions 0 0 0 0 0
General Fund Subsidy 0 0 0 0 0
New Revenue 0 0 0 0 0
Other 0 0 0 0 0
Total Revenue and Beginning Cash $23,015 $0 $0 $0 $0
Comments
421.000.308.00.000.00
Total Expenses
E6JC/c493
Carryforward
If previously discussed, date(s) of discussion:
Interfund Services 421.000.74.534.34.41.67
Professional Services 421.000.74.594.34.65.41
Construction(Water)421.000.74.594.34.65.10
Carryforward of portion of design phase work that did not get completed in 2017
and will be completed in 2018. Construction is still planned to start in 2018 and be
completed in 2018.
Public Works
WATER Engineering Fund
Name:2018 Waterline Replacement Project
Ed Sibrel
6.8.a
Packet Pg. 195 Attachment: 2018 Carryforward Budget Amendment Ordinance (2018 Carryforward Budget Amendments)
EXHIBIT “E”: Carryforward Items for Council to Consider (February 2018)
42
Budget Amendment for:Carryforward Item
Item Description:
Department:
Division:
Title:
Preparer:
Department Account Number:
Budget Amendment Type?
What is the nature of the expenditure?One-Time
Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital?Capital
Fill In Item Description[s]
Baseline
Budget 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
20,000 1,000 0 0 0 0
90,000 6,449 0 0 0 0
2,090,000 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
Sub-Total $2,200,000 $7,449 $0 $0 $0 $0
$2,207,449 $0 $0 $0 $0
Revenue and Beginning Cash 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Beginning Cash: Carryforward 7,449 0 0 0 0
Beginning Cash: Carryforward 0 0 0 0 0
Grants/Contributions 0 0 0 0 0
General Fund Subsidy 0 0 0 0 0
New Revenue 0 0 0 0 0
Other 0 0 0 0 0
Total Revenue and Beginning Cash $7,449 $0 $0 $0 $0
Comments
421.000.308.00.000.00
Total Expenses
E5KA/c473
Carryforward
If previously discussed, date(s) of discussion:
Interfund Services 421.000.74.534.34.41.67
Professional Services 421.000.74.594.34.65.41
Construction(Water)421.000.74.594.34.65.10
Unspent design funds moved from 2017 to 2018 to cover final design of project.
Construction is still expected to begin in 2018.
Public Works
WATER Engineering Fund
Name:5 Corners Reservoir Recoating
Michele (Mike) De Lilla
6.8.a
Packet Pg. 196 Attachment: 2018 Carryforward Budget Amendment Ordinance (2018 Carryforward Budget Amendments)
EXHIBIT “E”: Carryforward Items for Council to Consider (February 2018)
43
Budget Amendment for:Carryforward Item
Item Description:
Department:
Division:
Title:
Preparer:
Department Account Number:
Budget Amendment Type?
What is the nature of the expenditure?One-Time
Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital?Capital
Fill In Item Description[s]
Baseline
Budget 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
2,000 4,000 0 0 0 0
0 2,000 0 0 0 0
0 152,890 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
Sub-Total $2,000 $158,890 $0 $0 $0 $0
$160,890 $0 $0 $0 $0
Revenue and Beginning Cash 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Beginning Cash: Carryforward 158,890 0 0 0 0
Beginning Cash: Carryforward 0 0 0 0 0
Grants/Contributions 0 0 0 0 0
General Fund Subsidy 0 0 0 0 0
New Revenue 0 0 0 0 0
Other 0 0 0 0 0
Total Revenue and Beginning Cash $158,890 $0 $0 $0 $0
Comments
422.000.308.00.000.00
Total Expenses
E5FE/c484
Carryforward
If previously discussed, date(s) of discussion:
Interfund Services 422.000.72.531.31.41.67
Professional Services 422.000.72.531.90.41.20
Construction 422.000.72.594.31.65.20
Project is completed later in 2017 than planned. Closeout and final payment
extended to 2018.
Public Works
STORMEngineeringFund
Name:Sierra & 12th
Michele (Mike) De Lilla
6.8.a
Packet Pg. 197 Attachment: 2018 Carryforward Budget Amendment Ordinance (2018 Carryforward Budget Amendments)
EXHIBIT “E”: Carryforward Items for Council to Consider (February 2018)
44
Budget Amendment for:Carryforward Item
Item Description:
Department:
Division:
Title:
Preparer:
Department Account Number:
Budget Amendment Type?
What is the nature of the expenditure?One-Time
Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital?Capital
Fill In Item Description[s]
Baseline
Budget 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
36,200 9,030 0 0 0 0
58,960 16,766 0 0 0 0
343,200 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
Sub-Total $438,360 $25,796 $0 $0 $0 $0
$464,156 $0 $0 $0 $0
Revenue and Beginning Cash 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Beginning Cash: Carryforward 25,796 0 0 0 0
Beginning Cash: Carryforward 0 0 0 0 0
Grants/Contributions 0 0 0 0 0
General Fund Subsidy 0 0 0 0 0
New Revenue 0 0 0 0 0
Other 0 0 0 0 0
Total Revenue and Beginning Cash $25,796 $0 $0 $0 $0
Comments
422.000.308.00.000.00
Total Expenses
E6FA / i011
Carryforward
If previously discussed, date(s) of discussion:
Interfund Services 422.000.72.531.31.41.67
Professional Services 422.000.72.531.90.41.20
Construction 422.000.72.594.31.65.20
The final design activities extended from 2017 into 2018. The project has been
advertised for construction bids and work is scheduled to begin in spring.
Public Works
STORMEngineeringFund
Name:Northstream Culvert Replacement & Pipe Abandmt.
Ed Sibrel
6.8.a
Packet Pg. 198 Attachment: 2018 Carryforward Budget Amendment Ordinance (2018 Carryforward Budget Amendments)
EXHIBIT “E”: Carryforward Items for Council to Consider (February 2018)
45
Budget Amendment for:Carryforward Item
Item Description:
Department:
Division:
Title:
Preparer:
Department Account Number:
Budget Amendment Type?
What is the nature of the expenditure?One-Time
Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital?Capital
Fill In Item Description[s]
Baseline
Budget 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
0 4,000 0 0 0 0
0 10,000 0 0 0 0
0 31,107 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
Sub-Total $0 $45,107 $0 $0 $0 $0
$45,107 $0 $0 $0 $0
Revenue and Beginning Cash 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Beginning Cash: Carryforward 45,107 0 0 0 0
Beginning Cash: Carryforward 0 0 0 0 0
Grants/Contributions 0 0 0 0 0
General Fund Subsidy 0 0 0 0 0
New Revenue 0 0 0 0 0
Other 0 0 0 0 0
Total Revenue and Beginning Cash $45,107 $0 $0 $0 $0
Comments
423.200.308.30.000.00
Total Expenses
E5ga/c469
Carryforward
If previously discussed, date(s) of discussion:
Interfund Services 423.200.75.535.35.41.67
Professional Services 423.200.75.594.35.65.41
Construction 423.200.75.594.35.65.00
Project was completed later in 2017 than planned. Closeout extended to 2018.
Public Works
SEWER / TREATMENT
PLANT
Engineering Fund
Name:2016 Sewer Replacement
Michele (Mike) De Lilla
6.8.a
Packet Pg. 199 Attachment: 2018 Carryforward Budget Amendment Ordinance (2018 Carryforward Budget Amendments)
EXHIBIT “E”: Carryforward Items for Council to Consider (February 2018)
46
Budget Amendment for:Carryforward Item
Item Description:
Department:
Division:
Title:
Preparer:
Department Account Number:
Budget Amendment Type?
What is the nature of the expenditure?One-Time
Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital?Capital
Fill In Item Description[s]
Baseline
Budget 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
5,000 8,000 0 0 0 0
32,000 43,089 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
Sub-Total $37,000 $51,089 $0 $0 $0 $0
$88,089 $0 $0 $0 $0
Revenue and Beginning Cash 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Beginning Cash: Carryforward 51,089 0 0 0 0
Beginning Cash: Carryforward 0 0 0 0 0
Grants/Contributions 0 0 0 0 0
General Fund Subsidy 0 0 0 0 0
New Revenue 0 0 0 0 0
Other 0 0 0 0 0
Total Revenue and Beginning Cash $51,089 $0 $0 $0 $0
Comments
423.200.308.30.000.00
Total Expenses
E4GC/c461
Carryforward
If previously discussed, date(s) of discussion:
Interfund Services 423.200.75.535.35.41.67
Professional Services 423.200.75.594.35.65.41
Construction 423.200.75.594.35.65.00
Study Work extended into 2018 due to additional data gathering needed to
complete a deeper evaluation of the two leading alternatives. Study is planned on
being complete by 2018.
Public Works
SEWER / TREATMENT
PLANT
Engineering Fund
Name:LS#1 Metering & Flow Study
Michele (Mike) De Lilla
6.8.a
Packet Pg. 200 Attachment: 2018 Carryforward Budget Amendment Ordinance (2018 Carryforward Budget Amendments)
EXHIBIT “E”: Carryforward Items for Council to Consider (February 2018)
47
Budget Amendment for:Carryforward Item
Item Description:
Department:
Division:
Title:
Preparer:
Department Account Number:
Budget Amendment Type?
What is the nature of the expenditure?One-Time
Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital?Capital
Fill In Item Description[s]
Baseline
Budget 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
12,981 3,000 0 0 0 0
96,912 100,108 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
Sub-Total $109,893 $103,108 $0 $0 $0 $0
$213,001 $0 $0 $0 $0
Revenue and Beginning Cash 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Beginning Cash: Carryforward 103,108 0 0 0 0
Beginning Cash: Carryforward 0 0 0 0 0
Grants/Contributions 0 0 0 0 0
General Fund Subsidy 0 0 0 0 0
New Revenue 0 0 0 0 0
Other 0 0 0 0 0
Total Revenue and Beginning Cash $103,108 $0 $0 $0 $0
Comments
423.200.308.30.000.00
Total Expenses
E5GB/s011
Carryforward
If previously discussed, date(s) of discussion:
Interfund Services 423.200.75.535.35.41.67
Professional Services 423.200.75.594.35.65.41
Construction 423.200.75.594.35.65.00
Carryforward of unused 2017 consultant budget for study that are planned on
being spent in 2018.
Public Works
SEWER / TREATMENT
PLANT
Engineering Fund
Name:LakeBallinger Trunk Sewer Study
Michele (Mike) De Lilla
6.8.a
Packet Pg. 201 Attachment: 2018 Carryforward Budget Amendment Ordinance (2018 Carryforward Budget Amendments)
EXHIBIT “E”: Carryforward Items for Council to Consider (February 2018)
48
Budget Amendment for:Carryforward Item
Item Description:
Department:
Division:
Title:
Preparer:
Department Account Number:
Budget Amendment Type?
What is the nature of the expenditure?One-Time
Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital?Capital
Fill In Item Description[s]
Baseline
Budget 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
36,452 0 0 0 0 0
100,966 77,650 0 0 0 0
591,612 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
Sub-Total $729,030 $77,650 $0 $0 $0 $0
$806,680 $0 $0 $0 $0
Revenue and Beginning Cash 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Beginning Cash: Carryforward 77,650 0 0 0 0
Beginning Cash: Carryforward 0 0 0 0 0
Grants/Contributions 0 0 0 0 0
General Fund Subsidy 0 0 0 0 0
New Revenue 0 0 0 0 0
Other 0 0 0 0 0
Total Revenue and Beginning Cash $77,650 $0 $0 $0 $0
Carryforward of portion of design phase work that did not get completed in 2017
and will be completed in 2018. Construction is still planned to start in 2018.
E6GB/c488
Interfund Services 423.200.75.535.35.41.67
Carryforward
Public Works
SEWER / TREATMENT
PLANT
Engineering Fund
Name:Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase II
Ed Sibrel
Construction 423.200.75.594.35.65.00
If previously discussed, date(s) of discussion:
Total Expenses
Comments
423.200.308.30.000.00
Professional Services 423.200.75.594.35.65.41
6.8.a
Packet Pg. 202 Attachment: 2018 Carryforward Budget Amendment Ordinance (2018 Carryforward Budget Amendments)
EXHIBIT “E”: Carryforward Items for Council to Consider (February 2018)
49
Budget Amendment for:Carryforward Item
Item Description:
Department:
Division:
Title:
Preparer:
Department Account Number:
Budget Amendment Type?
What is the nature of the expenditure?One-Time
Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital?Capital
Fill In Item Description[s]
Baseline
Budget 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
0 75,000 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
Sub-Total $0 $75,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
$75,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
Revenue and Beginning Cash 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Beginning Cash: Carryforward 75,000 0 0 0 0
Beginning Cash: Carryforward 0 0 0 0 0
Grants/Contributions 0 0 0 0 0
General Fund Subsidy 0 0 0 0 0
New Revenue 0 0 0 0 0
Other 0 0 0 0 0
Total Revenue and Beginning Cash $75,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
423
423.000.75.594.35.64.00
If previously discussed, date(s) of discussion:
Carryforward
A 50 Kilowatt, Portable Generator is needed for Emergency Backup. The pump
stations were recently upgraded and the smaller, portable generators are
undersized for the demand required. Locating and procuring a Portable Generator
that fits the needs of the department and can comply with Emissions Standards
has proven difficult. The Sewer Division intends to purchase a Cummins brand
generator that can fulfill that requirement by the end of 2018.
Public Works
SEWER / TREATMENT
PLANT
Water Fund
Name:Budget Carryover for Equipment
Waite/Napolitino
Total Expenses
Comments
423.000.308.00.000.00
6.8.a
Packet Pg. 203 Attachment: 2018 Carryforward Budget Amendment Ordinance (2018 Carryforward Budget Amendments)
EXHIBIT “E”: Carryforward Items for Council to Consider (February 2018)
50
Budget Amendment for:Carryforward Item
Item Description:
Department:
Division:
Title:
Preparer:
Department Account Number:
Budget Amendment Type?
What is the nature of the expenditure?One-Time
Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital?Capital
Fill In Item Description[s]
Baseline
Budget 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
0 178,193 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 350,863 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
Sub-Total $0 $529,056 $0 $0 $0 $0
$529,056 $0 $0 $0 $0
Revenue and Beginning Cash 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Beginning Cash: Carryforward 178,193 0 0 0 0
Beginning Cash: Carryforward 0 0 0 0 0
City Edmonds Contribution 178,193 0 0 0 0
City of Mountlake Terrace 81,309 0 0 0 0
Olympic View Water District 58,071 0 0 0 0
Ronald Wastewater 33,290 0 0 0 0
Total Revenue and Beginning Cash $529,056 $0 $0 $0 $0
Carryforward is required to ensure remaining commitments are met. Projects
which were scheduled for completion in 2017 were not completed due to unforseen
impacts. Carryforward for project C465.tp.wtp (Clarifier #3), C431.tp.wtp (Phase
5 Energy), and C481.tp.wtp (Outfall repair projects).
Wastewater Treatment
SEWER / TREATMENT
PLANT
Public Works Fund
Name:2017 to 2018 Carryover WWTP
Randolph
Total Expenses
423.100.374.07.030.00
Comments
423.000.308.00.000.00
423.100.397.38.423.20
423.100.374.07.010.00
423.100.374.07.020.00
Construction (65)
If previously discussed, date(s) of discussion:
423.100.76.594.39
423.000.75.597.35.55.23 Transfer from Sewer
Carryforward
6.8.a
Packet Pg. 204 Attachment: 2018 Carryforward Budget Amendment Ordinance (2018 Carryforward Budget Amendments)
EXHIBIT “E”: Carryforward Items for Council to Consider (February 2018)
51
Budget Amendment for:Carryforward Item
Item Description:
Department:
Division:
Title:
Preparer:
Department Account Number:
Budget Amendment Type?
What is the nature of the expenditure?One-Time
Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital?Operating
Fill In Item Description[s]
Baseline
Budget 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
20,000 14,300 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
94,000 75,000 0 0 0 0
252,590 55,000 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
Sub-Total $366,590 $144,300 $0 $0 $0 $0
$510,890 $0 $0 $0 $0
Revenue and Beginning Cash 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Beginning Cash: Carryforward 144,300 0 0 0 0
Beginning Cash: Carryforward 0 0 0 0 0
Grants/Contributions 0 0 0 0 0
General Fund Subsidy 0 0 0 0 0
New Revenue 0 0 0 0 0
Other 0 0 0 0 0
Total Revenue and Beginning Cash $144,300 $0 $0 $0 $0
If previously discussed, date(s) of discussion:
512.000.31.518
512.000.31.518.87.41.00- Fiber Prof Serv
Carryforward
512.000.31.518.88.41.00 Professional Service
512.000.31.518.88.48.00 Repair & Maintenance
Total Expenses
Comments
512.000.308.00.000.00
Carry forward for telephone / networking preliminary work of cabling and fiber.
Includes end point equipment upgrades
Administrative Services
GENERALInformation Technology Fund
Name:Telephone/Networking
Brian Tuley
6.8.a
Packet Pg. 205 Attachment: 2018 Carryforward Budget Amendment Ordinance (2018 Carryforward Budget Amendments)
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 02/20/2018
Crumb Rubber extension of moratorium
Staff Lead: Carrie Hite
Department: Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services
Preparer: Carrie Hite
Background/History
The City Council extended this prohibition of SBR installations on April 11, 2017. This new extension
expires on February 28, 2018.
The City Council adopted the first ordinance 4013 on December 8th, 2015 prohibiting certain
installations of SBR until July 11, 2017.
The City Council identified this issue at their Council retreat in January 2017 as needing some discussion
and attention.
Staff Recommendation
Council to discuss and consider adoption of an ordinance to extend the ban on the use of SBR infill in the
City of Edmonds.
Narrative
The City Council adopted Ordinance 4065.1 on April 11, 2017 to extend the prohibition of certain
installations of SBR on public lands in the City of Edmonds. The Council's intent was to extend it until
the Federal study was completed and a report issued. The Federal Study is being conducted by the US
Environmental Protection Agency and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Center
for Environmental Health/Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. In addition, the Council
was monitoring the OEHHA Synthetic Turf Study from the California EPA.
In recent contact with the staff public relations lead for the Federal effort, although the study was
projected to be issued by the end of 2017, she is now projecting mid 2018. Currently, they have
completed collecting all samples and will be issuing a draft report for peer review in February 2018.
They then will release the final report once it completes the peer review process.
The most recent update from the California study can be found at this link:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8U5LfN6Z3sg&feature=youtu.be
The OEHHA study hopes to release their report this year as well.
The PPP committee of Council discussed this matter at the February 13th Council Committee meeting.
They proposed a few changes in the draft ordinance, including extending the timeline of the ban to
August 7, 2018, and clarifying the requirements of holding a public hearing. Attached in this packet are
both the draft ordinance for consideration and a memo from City Attorney Jeff Taraday addressing the
public hearing requirements.
7.1
Packet Pg. 206
As way of background, the initial Ordinance 4013 prohibits certain installations of SBR in the City of
Edmonds limits. It also called for the Council to engage an independent consultant with appropriate
expertise to review the research that has been completed. In addition, the Council was to provide a
report sometime in 2016 that would allow for the risks associated with crumb rubber to be reassessed
basing on the latest authoritative information. It then called for a public hearing in June of 2017 to
determine whether the ordinance should be extended.
A Council subcommittee comprised of Mike Nelson, Dave Tietzel, and Kristiana Johnson had met several
times with staff, and it was recommended the Council not conduct an independent study because of the
current efforts already happening. In addition, it was requested that Council consider a new ordinance
to extend the moratorium until February 28, 2018. It also called out the requirement to continue to
monitor the status of ongoing and new research as it becomes available.
Attached is the explanation of the Federal study and the OEHHA California study, the first Ordinance
4013, the second Ordinance 4065.1, and a draft Ordinance to extend the moratorium if Council so
desires.
Attachments:
2018-02-14 ordinance extending ban on crumb rubber committee edits
2018-02-14 memo re public hearing on crumb rubber
Ordinance 4065.1
Ordinance 4013
2017-03-29 Attachment A
2017-03-29 Attachment B
7.1
Packet Pg. 207
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON, EXTENDING THE PROHIBITION OF THE INSTALLATION OF STYRENE-BUTADIENE RUBBER
(ALSO KNOWN AS SBR OR “CRUMB RUBBER”) ON
PUBLICLY-OWNED ATHLETIC FIELDS WITHIN THE CITY
OF EDMONDS UNTIL AUGUST 7, 2018.
WHEREAS, the city council adopted Ordinance 4013 on December 8, 2015; and
WHEREAS, Ordinance 4013 prohibited certain installations of SBR until July 11, 2017;
and
WHEREAS, the city council adopted Ordinance 4065.1 on April 11, 2017, which
extended the sunset date of the prohibitions set forth in Ordinance 4013 until February 28, 2018;
and
WHEREAS, the Edmonds City Council intended for additional analysis to be done
during the prohibition period to determine whether the duration of the prohibition should be
extended; and
WHEREAS, on February 12, 2016, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA),
the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease
Registry (ATSDR), and the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) launched a multi-
agency Federal Research Action Plan on Recycled Tire Crumb Used on Playing Fields and
Playgrounds to study key environmental and human health questions; and
WHEREAS, on December 30, 2016, these agencies released a status report describing the
progress of the research to date. The status report includes the final peer-reviewed Literature
Review/Gaps Analysis report and describes the progress to date on other research activities that
are part of the effort including:
• Characterization of the chemicals found in tire crumb.
• Characterization of the exposure scenarios for those who use turf fields containing tire
crumb.
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 208 Attachment: 2018-02-14 ordinance extending ban on crumb rubber committee edits (Crumb Rubber extension of moratorium)
• Study to better understand how children use playgrounds containing tire crumb.
• Outreach to key stakeholders; and
WHEREAS, the status report does not include research findings. For the characterization
of the chemicals research, tire crumb material has been collected from tire recycling plants and
synthetic turf fields around the U.S. Tire crumb samples have been gathered from nine tire
crumb recycling plants, 19 fields located on US Army installations and 21 community fields
including both indoor and outdoor fields. Analysis of the tire crumb samples collected from
fields and recycling facilities, and the exposure characterization component of the study will
continue in 2017. Parts of the exposure study may be conducted during the hotter months of
2017. The CPSC playground study also will continue in 2017; and
WHEREAS, this federal research effort won’t provide all the answers about whether
synthetic turf fields are safe, it represents the first time that such a large study is being conducted
across the U.S. The study will provide a better understanding of potential exposures that athletes
and others may experience and will help answer some of the key questions that have been raised.
Depending upon the findings, available resources and other considerations, additional research
beyond the first year may be conducted; and
WHEREAS, the EPA has provided a question and answer sheet regarding tire crumb
which is attached hereto as Attachment A; and
WHEREAS, on August 2, 2017, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) approved
the Information Collection Request for the continuation of the exposure characterization part of
the study; and
WHEREAS, with the OMB approval, the EPA and CDC/ATSDR team were able to
complete the field work associated with the exposure characterization in the Fall of 2017; and
WHEREAS, prior to the August 2017 OMB approval, the exposure characterization
portion of the study as outlined in the Federal Research Action Plan was posted for public
comment in February 2017; and
WHEREAS, an additional requirement of a 30-day Federal Register Notice, along with
the Information Collection Request package was published on June 12, 2017; and
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 209 Attachment: 2018-02-14 ordinance extending ban on crumb rubber committee edits (Crumb Rubber extension of moratorium)
WHEREAS, the draft report will be sent to external peer-review in Spring 2018, with the
expectation of releasing a final peer-reviewed report summarizing study results in mid-2018; and
WHEREAS, the California Environmental Protection Agency’s Office of Environmental
Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) is also conducting a study on synthetic turf and potential
human health impacts. An August 30, 2016 fact sheet related to that study is attached hereto as
Attachment B; and
WHEREAS, OEHHA will release a draft report describing the preliminary data and
results of the study in mid-2018; and
WHEREAS, given the ongoing nature of this significant research effort, the city council
would like to extend the prohibition contained in Ordinance 4013 until August 7, 2018; and
WHEREAS, it is possible that the city council will want to extend the prohibition again
depending on the status of these ongoing research efforts and the findings that they might
generate; and
WHEREAS, since the adoption of Ordinance 4013, the City of Seattle, as a pilot project,
has replaced the SBR material at its Bobby Morris Playfield with an infill made from cork; and
WHEREAS, Seattle’s pilot project will test the durability, safety, playability,
maintainability and environmental health of the cork turf infill material;
NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN
AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Definitions.
The following definitions shall apply to Section 2 of this ordinance:
A. SBR. “SBR” is an athletic field material consisting of recycled tires consisting
of styrene-butadiene rubber. It is commonly known as “crumb rubber.” It is used as an infill
material and/or as a base layer under the infill.
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 210 Attachment: 2018-02-14 ordinance extending ban on crumb rubber committee edits (Crumb Rubber extension of moratorium)
B. Publicly-owned athletic fields. A “publicly-owned athletic field” is an athletic
field owned by a city, county, school district, port district, hospital district, other special purpose
district or government entity.
Section 2. SBR Prohibition.
For as long as this ordinance remains in effect, it shall be unlawful to:
A. Install SBR on publicly-owned athletic fields already existing within the City of
Edmonds if those fields have not already been converted to an SBRcomposition;
B. Install SBR on new public-owned athletic fields within the City of Edmonds;
C. Install SBR on existing publicly-owned SBR athletic fields within the City of
Edmonds as part of a substantial renovation of such existing SBR fields,
PROVIDED THAT, for maintenance purposes, infill top dressing of existing SBR
fields shall be allowed as needed to keep an appropriate amount of the fiber
exposed and to maintain proper infill depth.
Section 3. Additional Analysis. During the above-described prohibition, city council
intends to:
A. Monitor the status of ongoing and new research into the health effects of SBR,
including but not limited to the significant studies being performed by the federal
government and the state of California;
B. Conduct a public hearing to determine whether this ordinance should be extended
when there is sufficient new information to warrant a public hearing.
Section 4. Sunset. Unless the effective duration of this ordinance is extended by a
subsequently adopted ordinance, the provisions of this ordinance shall be null, void, and of no
force and effect on or after August 7, 2018.
Section 5. Severability. If any section, subsection, clause, sentence, or phrase of this
ordinance should be held invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of
the remaining portions of this ordinance.
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 211 Attachment: 2018-02-14 ordinance extending ban on crumb rubber committee edits (Crumb Rubber extension of moratorium)
Section 6. Effective Date. This ordinance is subject to referendum and shall take effect
thirty (30) days after final passage of this ordinance.
APPROVED:
MAYOR DAVE EARLING
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED:
CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY APPROVED AS TO FORM:
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY:
BY
JEFF TARADAY
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: PUBLISHED:
EFFECTIVE DATE:
ORDINANCE NO.
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 212 Attachment: 2018-02-14 ordinance extending ban on crumb rubber committee edits (Crumb Rubber extension of moratorium)
6
SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. _4013
of the City of Edmonds, Washington
On the ____ day of ___________, 2018, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed Ordinance No. _____________. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting
of the title, provides as follows:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON, EXTENDING THE PROHIBITION OF THE INSTALLATION OF STYRENE-BUTADIENE RUBBER (ALSO KNOWN AS SBR OR “CRUMB
RUBBER”) ON PUBLICLY-OWNED ATHLETIC
FIELDS WITHIN THE CITY OF EDMONDS UNTIL
AUGUST 7, 2018. .
The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request.
DATED this _____ day of ________________, 2018.
CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 213 Attachment: 2018-02-14 ordinance extending ban on crumb rubber committee edits (Crumb Rubber extension of moratorium)
Date: February 14, 2018
To: Edmonds City Council
Copy: David Earling, Mayor
Carrie Hite, Parks, Recreation, and Cultural Serv. Director
From: Jeff Taraday
Re: Public hearings regarding the proposed extension of the
crumb rubber prohibition
On December 8, 2015, the city council adopted Ordinance 4013,
prohibiting certain installations of SBR or crumb rubber until July 11,
2017. The city council adopted Ordinance 4065.1 on April 11, 2017, which
extended the sunset date of the prohibitions set forth in Ordinance 4013
until February 28, 2018. The Edmonds City Council intended for
additional analysis to be done during the prohibition period to determine
whether the duration of the prohibition should be extended. For this
reason, the city council included language in Section 3 of Ordinance
4065.1 stating:
During the above-described prohibition, city council intends to:
A. Monitor the status of ongoing and new research into the
health effects of SBR, including but not limited to the significant
studies being performed by the federal government and the state
of California;
B. Conduct a public hearing in January of 2018 to
determine whether this ordinance should be extended.
Ordinance 4065.1 (emphasis added). No public hearing was conducted in
January 2018 as neither of the two studies referenced in Section 3.A of
Ordinance 4065.1 had been completed as of that date. A question has been
7.1.b
Packet Pg. 214 Attachment: 2018-02-14 memo re public hearing on crumb rubber (Crumb Rubber extension of moratorium)
posed regarding whether the council’s not holding the hearing in January
2018 has any effect on its ability to extend the prohibition to August 7,
2018 as proposed. For the following reasons, we do not consider the public
hearing referenced in Section 3.A to be a prerequisite to the extension of
the crumb rubber ban.
In temporarily banning the installation of crumb rubber, the city is using
its police power. “Any county, city, town or township may make and
enforce within its limits all such local police, sanitary and other
regulations as are not in conflict with general laws.” Wa. Const. art. XI, §
11. “[A]n ordinance is valid under this provision unless: (1) the Ordinance
conflicts with some general law; (2) the Ordinance is not a reasonable
exercise of the [local government's] police power; or (3) the subject matter
of the Ordinance is not local.” Cannabis Action Coal. v. City of Kent, 183
Wn.2d 219, 225–26, 351 P.3d 151, 154 (2015).
No state law conflicts with the city’s adoption of the proposed ordinance.
This ordinance, extending a temporary prohibition of certain crumb
rubber installations, should be distinguished from an interim zoning
ordinance or moratorium. Unlike this ordinance, those actions do require
a public hearing to renew the action for another six months. This
ordinance is not an interim zoning ordinance because the city is not
exercising its zoning power in extending this prohibition. Unlike a zoning
regulation, this prohibition applies to all locations within Edmonds,
regardless of the zoning. Nor is the prohibition a moratorium on new
development. A moratorium suspends all new development. Here, athletic
fields and playgrounds may still be constructed in Edmonds from various
different materials. But they cannot be constructed from crumb rubber
during this temporary prohibition. Because the city’s temporary
prohibition is neither an interim zoning ordinance or a moratorium, the
public hearing requirement related to those two types of action does not
apply. We know of no other law that would require a public hearing as a
prerequisite to adoption of this ordinance.
7.1.b
Packet Pg. 215 Attachment: 2018-02-14 memo re public hearing on crumb rubber (Crumb Rubber extension of moratorium)
Finally, the language of the Ordinance 4065.1 did not require a public
hearing in January 2018. It expressed a statement of intent to hold a
public hearing. But the language of Section 3 evinces an intent to hold a
substantive hearing as to how the findings of the new studies should
influence the city’s crumb rubber policy. The language does not suggest an
intent to hold a hearing for the sake of holding a hearing. Because the two
studies still have not been completed, it is unlikely that conducting a
public hearing at this time would be helpful to the city council’s
deliberative process.
Having said that, the city council can hold a public hearing on any matter
whenever it chooses. Taking action on the proposed ordinance does not
foreclose the possibility of a public hearing in the near future if the council
deems a hearing to be warranted.
Finally, it should be noted that the temporary prohibition could be
repealed by the city council prior to the scheduled sunset date if the
council deems it necessary to lift the crumb rubber ban earlier than
expected, e.g., if the studies are released earlier than expected and their
findings do not suggest a need to continue the ban.
7.1.b
Packet Pg. 216 Attachment: 2018-02-14 memo re public hearing on crumb rubber (Crumb Rubber extension of moratorium)
7.1.c
Packet Pg. 217 Attachment: Ordinance 4065.1 (Crumb Rubber extension of moratorium)
7.1.c
Packet Pg. 218 Attachment: Ordinance 4065.1 (Crumb Rubber extension of moratorium)
7.1.c
Packet Pg. 219 Attachment: Ordinance 4065.1 (Crumb Rubber extension of moratorium)
7.1.c
Packet Pg. 220 Attachment: Ordinance 4065.1 (Crumb Rubber extension of moratorium)
7.1.c
Packet Pg. 221 Attachment: Ordinance 4065.1 (Crumb Rubber extension of moratorium)
7.1.c
Packet Pg. 222 Attachment: Ordinance 4065.1 (Crumb Rubber extension of moratorium)
7.1.c
Packet Pg. 223 Attachment: Ordinance 4065.1 (Crumb Rubber extension of moratorium)
7.1.c
Packet Pg. 224 Attachment: Ordinance 4065.1 (Crumb Rubber extension of moratorium)
7.1.c
Packet Pg. 225 Attachment: Ordinance 4065.1 (Crumb Rubber extension of moratorium)
7.1.c
Packet Pg. 226 Attachment: Ordinance 4065.1 (Crumb Rubber extension of moratorium)
7.1.c
Packet Pg. 227 Attachment: Ordinance 4065.1 (Crumb Rubber extension of moratorium)
7.1.c
Packet Pg. 228 Attachment: Ordinance 4065.1 (Crumb Rubber extension of moratorium)
7.1.c
Packet Pg. 229 Attachment: Ordinance 4065.1 (Crumb Rubber extension of moratorium)
7.1.c
Packet Pg. 230 Attachment: Ordinance 4065.1 (Crumb Rubber extension of moratorium)
7.1.c
Packet Pg. 231 Attachment: Ordinance 4065.1 (Crumb Rubber extension of moratorium)
7.1.c
Packet Pg. 232 Attachment: Ordinance 4065.1 (Crumb Rubber extension of moratorium)
7.1.c
Packet Pg. 233 Attachment: Ordinance 4065.1 (Crumb Rubber extension of moratorium)
7.1.c
Packet Pg. 234 Attachment: Ordinance 4065.1 (Crumb Rubber extension of moratorium)
7.1.c
Packet Pg. 235 Attachment: Ordinance 4065.1 (Crumb Rubber extension of moratorium)
7.1.d
Packet Pg. 236 Attachment: Ordinance 4013 (Crumb Rubber extension of moratorium)
7.1.d
Packet Pg. 237 Attachment: Ordinance 4013 (Crumb Rubber extension of moratorium)
7.1.d
Packet Pg. 238 Attachment: Ordinance 4013 (Crumb Rubber extension of moratorium)
7.1.d
Packet Pg. 239 Attachment: Ordinance 4013 (Crumb Rubber extension of moratorium)
7.1.d
Packet Pg. 240 Attachment: Ordinance 4013 (Crumb Rubber extension of moratorium)
7.1.d
Packet Pg. 241 Attachment: Ordinance 4013 (Crumb Rubber extension of moratorium)
7.1.d
Packet Pg. 242 Attachment: Ordinance 4013 (Crumb Rubber extension of moratorium)
7.1.d
Packet Pg. 243 Attachment: Ordinance 4013 (Crumb Rubber extension of moratorium)
Tire Crumb Questions and Answers
Q. Which agencies are involved with the Federal Research Action Plan?
This plan is led and chiefly implemented by the US Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s National
Center for Environmental Health/Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease
Registry (CDC-NCEH/ATSDR), in cooperation with the US Consumer Product
Safety Commission (CPSC) and other agencies. Other agencies such as National
Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, the U.S. Department of Defense and
California’s Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) will
provide expertise, facilities and/or sharing of information.
Q. What research is included in the Federal Research Action Plan? Will it
answer the question of whether tire crumb is safe?
The plan includes four research activities:
1. Outreach to key stakeholders - EPA, CDC/ATSDR, and CPSC are having
discussions with other government agencies that have researched or are
currently researching tire crumb that provide expertise to inform the federal
study, and other key stakeholder groups including tire crumb
manufacturers, non-profit organizations, field installers and maintenance
professionals, and field users.
2. Analysis of data gaps - EPA, CDC/ATSDR, and CPSC evaluated the
existing scientific information related to the use of recycled rubber tire
crumb in synthetic turf fields to understand the current state-of-the-science
and inform the research activities. The Literature Review and Data Gaps
Analysis is included in the status report released in December 2016.
3. Characterization of the chemicals found in tire crumb - EPA,
CDC/ATSDR, and CPSC are testing tire crumb from different
manufacturing plants and fields. These tests, along with existing scientific
information from the literature, will help us better understand the make-up
of tire crumb.
4. Characterization of the exposure scenarios - EPA, CDC/ATSDR, and
CPSC are conducting several activities to better understand potential
exposures that may occur when people use synthetic turf fields. This work
is considering all possible ways that one may be exposed including by
breathing, unintentionally ingesting, or touching tire crumb or the
chemicals in tire crumb.
While this effort won’t provide all the answers, the information will help answer
some of the key questions that have been raised about tire crumb used in synthetic
turf fields and will provide a better understanding of potential exposures that field
users may experience by using these fields. The research activities have been
prioritized based on data needs and available resources. This study will provide a
better understanding of the chemicals found in tire crumb and the potential
7.1.e
Packet Pg. 244 Attachment: 2017-03-29 Attachment A (Crumb Rubber extension of moratorium)
exposures that field users may experience by using these fields. This study, in and
of itself, will not determine if fields are safe, but this work is a necessary first step
that needs to be taken.
Depending on the findings, available resources and other considerations,
additional research beyond the first year may be conducted.
Q. What is the status of the research?
On December 30, 2016, the agencies released a status report describing the
progress of the research to date. The status report includes the final peer-reviewed
Literature Review/Gaps Analysis report and describes the progress to date on
other research activities that are part of the effort including:
Characterization of the chemicals found in tire crumb.
Characterization of the exposure scenarios for those who use turf fields
containing tire crumb.
Study to better understand how children use playgrounds containing tire
crumb.
Outreach to key stakeholders.
A final peer-reviewed Literature Review/Gaps Analysis was publicly released in
December 2016 as part of the status report. The status report does not include
research findings.
Collection of tire crumb samples from fields and recycling facilities is complete.
Tire crumb samples were gathered from nine tire crumb manufacturing plants, 19
fields located on U.S. Army installations and 21 community fields across the U.S.
Fields included both outdoor and indoor fields. Analysis of the tire crumb samples
collected from fields and recycling facilities, and the exposure characterization
component of the study, will continue in 2017. Parts of the exposure study may be
conducted during the hotter months of 2017. The CPSC playground study will
continue in 2017.
The Synthetic Turf Fields with Tire Crumb Rubber Infill Research Protocol
document was extensively reviewed, including a peer-review and an Institutional
Review Board review, and the document is now final. Data collection components
of the Federal Research on Recycled Tire Crumbs went through a public comment
period and an Information Collection Request review conducted by the Office of
Management and Budget. Peer-review and public comments are publicly
available on the OMB’s website. One of the main research activities gathered tire
crumb samples from tire crumb manufacturing plants and from fields across the
country.
EPA, ATSDR, and CPSC have engaged various stakeholder groups through a
number of outreach activities including a public comment process, webinars,
conference calls, and in-person meetings. Stakeholder outreach efforts were
targeted to the public as well as specific stakeholder groups, such as government
organizations (other federal agencies, state agencies, local government and
international government), industry and non-profit/interest groups.
7.1.e
Packet Pg. 245 Attachment: 2017-03-29 Attachment A (Crumb Rubber extension of moratorium)
As it is available, updated information will be posted to EPA’s tire crumb website
(www.epa.gov/tirecrumb).
Q. When did the research begin and when will it end?
The Federal Research Action Plan launched on February 12, 2016. The data
collection components (tire crumb sample collection and exposure
chracterization) of the study received OMB approval in August 2016. EPA,
ATSDR, and CPSC engaged various stakeholder groups through a number of
outreach activities including a public comment process, webinars, conference
calls, and in-person meetings. The final peer reviewed Literature Review/Gaps
Analysis report along with a progress report for other components of the study
was released in December 2016. Analysis of the tire crumb samples collected
from fields and recycling facilities, and the exposure characterization component
of the study, will continue in 2017. Parts of the exposure study may be conducted
during the hotter months of 2017. The CPSC playground study also will continue
in 2017.
Q. Where can I find responses to the public comments on this research
submitted through the Federal Register Notice?
Public comments submitted in response to the Federal Register Notice have been
reviewed by EPA and CDC/ATSDR. EPA and CDC/ATSDR responses to public
comments are available online -
http://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAViewDocument?ref_nbr=201607-0923-001
.
Q. What is the research protocol document?
The research protocol document describes the study design and protocol for three
research activities in the Federal Research Action Plan including the literature
review and data gaps analysis; the tire crumb collection and characterization; and
the characterization of human exposure to tire crumb in synthetic turf fields. The
document explains the study objectives, research design, methods that are being
used to characterize tire crumb and the exposures, data analysis techniques and
the quality assurance/quality control measures in place to ensure the integrity of
the research.
Q: Where are the fields located that will be studied?
Tire crumb samples were gathered from nine tire crumb manufacturing plants, 19
fields located on U.S. Army installations and 21 community fields across the U.S.
Fields included both outdoor and indoor fields. The analysis of the tire crumb
samples is underway. These locations include both outdoor and indoor playing
fields. To protect privacy, the names of the specific locations sampled will not be
released to the public.
Q. How can I find out more information about this research?
As it is available, updated information about the study will be posted to EPA’s
Tire Crumb Website: www.epa.gov/tirecrumb.
7.1.e
Packet Pg. 246 Attachment: 2017-03-29 Attachment A (Crumb Rubber extension of moratorium)
Q. What stakeholder outreach activities have been completed as part of this
study?
EPA, ATSDR, and CPSC have engaged various stakeholder groups through a
number of outreach activities including a public comment period, webinars,
conference calls, and in-person meetings. Stakeholder outreach efforts were
targeted to the public as well as specific stakeholder groups such as government
organizations (other federal agencies, state agencies, local government and
international government), industry and non-profit/interest groups.
The purpose of the stakeholder outreach was to inform the public about the
Federal Research Action Plan on Recycled Tire Crumb Used on Playing Fields
and Playgrounds and to encourage stakeholders to provide feedback on studies
that are part of the research. The outreach to specific stakeholder groups also
included information sharing around the manufacturing and the use of tire crumb
in synthetic turf fields.
Q. What are the key findings of the Literature Review/Gaps Analysis?
An important component of any research is to understand the state of the science
and any data gaps. The peer-reviewed Literature Review/Gaps Analysis (LRGA)
provides a current summary of the available literature and capture the data gaps as
characterized in those publications. The overall goals of the LRGA were to inform
the interagency research study and to identify potential areas for future research
that might be needed. The LRGA identified 90 references. Each reference
reviewed was categorized according to 20 general information categories (e.g.,
study topic, geographic location, sample type, conditions, and populations
studied) and more than 100 sub-categories (e.g., study topic subcategories: site
characterization, production process, leaching, off-gassing, microbial analysis,
and human risk). The research in the Federal Research Action Plan addresses
many of the gaps identified, particularly with respect to tire crumb rubber
characterization and exposure characterization. The review provides information
useful for guiding and designing future research efforts needed to further address
questions regarding exposures and risks for tire crumb rubber used in synthetic
turf fields and playgrounds.
Q. How is the Federal Government working with California?
California’s Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA), under
contract from CalRecycle, is conducting a comprehensive evaluation of tire
crumb. This evaluation is being designed to deliver the kind of information states,
communities and parents are looking for so they can make informed decisions for
their communities and their families. The US National Toxicology Program, at the
request of California’s Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment,
initiated a research program to better understand potential health impacts of
chemicals released from synthetic turf with an emphasis on crumb rubber. More
information about the NTP research is online
at http://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/results/areas/syntheticturf/research.html. EPA, CPSC
and other federal agencies are also working with California's OEHHA to provide
7.1.e
Packet Pg. 247 Attachment: 2017-03-29 Attachment A (Crumb Rubber extension of moratorium)
expertise to assist with OEHHA’s evaluation of tire crumb. More information
about California’s study is online - http://oehha.ca.gov/risk-assessment/synthetic-
turf-studies.
Q. How is the US Federal Government working with other international
government organizations interested in this topic, including the European
Chemicals Agency?
The European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) contacted EPA expressing their interest
in the U.S. study. ECHA is an agency of the European Union that implements
chemical legislation for the protection of human health and the environment. This
interest has resulted in regular calls with ECHA and an in-person meeting. During
these meetings, information related to research efforts are shared. In addition, the
Netherlands and France are also interested in studying tire crumb rubber exposure
and characterization and communications with these organizations are on-going.
More information about ECHA’s study is online -
https://echa.europa.eu/addressing-chemicals-of-concern/restriction/calls-for-
comments-and-evidence/-/substance-rev/15331/term.
Q. What advice do you have for communities who are concerned about the
use of tire crumb in fields?
We recognize that communities, parents and state and local officials are concerned
about tire crumb used in synthetic turf fields. While this short-term study won’t
provide all the answers, the study’s findings will provide a better understanding of
the chemical composition of tire crumb and the potential exposures people may
experience by using these fields.
Communities, parents, state and local officials are encouraged to explore the
federal agencies’ websites (CPSC - https://www.cpsc.gov/Safety-
Education/Safety-Education-Centers/Crumb-Rubber-Safety-Information-Center
and EPA - www.epa.gov/tirecrumb) to review the research results available to-
date on the use of recycled tire rubber in playgrounds and synthetic turf fields. In
addition, concerned individuals can check their state’s public health agency
websites to determine if there are state-specific recommendations. EPA compiled
a list of information from state government websites, which can be found online –
www.epa.gov/tirecrumb .
Q. Are there any alternative materials/products that can be used?
EPA is aware of a few alternatives to tire crumb that can be used as infill in
synthetic turf, such as organic materials like sand, coconut husks, or cork. In
addition, CPSC has suggested that the public and homeowners may use shredded
mulch, and other materials to create a shock-absorbing surface under backyard
and public playgrounds. However, EPA has not independently studied or
evaluated any of these alternative materials.
Q. Who regulates the management and disposal of used tires?
State solid waste agencies are primarily responsible for regulating the
management of used tires at their end of life, including options for recycling and
7.1.e
Packet Pg. 248 Attachment: 2017-03-29 Attachment A (Crumb Rubber extension of moratorium)
disposal. You can consult your state solid waste regulatory agency for information
and guidance on the proper management of used tires in a particular state.
Q. How is tire crumb produced?
Tire crumb is manufactured by reducing scrap tires down to various sizes
depending on its intended application and market use, and by removing 99
percent or more of the steel and fabric from them. The tire crumb is classified by
sifting screens that return oversize pieces back into the reduction process.
Magnets are used throughout the process to remove the wire and other metal
contaminants and air separators are used to remove the fabric. The American
Society for Testing Materials (ASTM) has a standard test method (ASTM D5644)
for determining the particle size distribution of recycled vulcanized particulate
rubber (a.k.a. tire crumb). ASTM D5603 classifies recycled vulcanized particulate
rubber based on particle size distribution and origin of the rubber.
Q. States and other organizations have conducted studies on tire crumb.
What have they concluded?
Current information from a number of studies does not show an elevated health
risk from playing on fields with tire crumb. However, these studies do not
comprehensively address the concerns about the potential health risks associated
with exposure to tire crumb.
Q. Will the results of the federal research be made public? Will states be
given access to help them make decisions about use?
Analysis of the tire crumb samples collected from fields and recycling facilities,
and the exposure characterization component of the study will continue in 2017.
Parts of the exposure study may be conducted during the hotter months of 2017.
The CPSC playground study also will continue in 2017. The agencies will release
to the public a final peer-reviewed report describing the findings and conclusions
of the studies.
Q. What are the various markets for tire crumb?
In the U.S., markets for tire crumb include new rubber products, playground and
other sports surfacing, and rubber-modified asphalt. The tire crumb used in these
ground rubber applications consumed 1,020,000 tons of scrap tires in 2015, or
about 26% of the volume of scrap tires generated. Sports surfaces accounted for
25% of tire crumb use.
Ground Rubber
Markets
7.1.e
Packet Pg. 249 Attachment: 2017-03-29 Attachment A (Crumb Rubber extension of moratorium)
Molded/Extruded Rubber
Products (e.g. rubber
gaskets)
35%
Playground Mulch 22%
Sports Surfaces 25%
Asphalt 15%
Automotive 2%
Export 1%
Source: Rubber Manufacturers Association: 2015 U.S. Scrap Tire Management
Summary.
LAST UPDATED ON DECEMBER 30, 2016
7.1.e
Packet Pg. 250 Attachment: 2017-03-29 Attachment A (Crumb Rubber extension of moratorium)
Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA)
California Environmental Protection Agency
1
Environmental Health Study of Synthetic Turf –
August 2016 Update
The California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) is conducting a
study of the potential health effects associated with the chemicals released from synthetic turf
and playground mats containing recycled waste tires. The California Department of
Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle), which regulates the use of waste tires in
California, has contracted with OEHHA to perform the study.
What’s New?
OEHHA has amended the contract with CalRecycle based upon input from the Synthetic Turf
Scientific Advisory Panel and input from the public. The scope of the synthetic turf field
investigation has been expanded to include: methods to extract as many chemicals as
possible from crumb rubber samples for identification, the use of more suitable artificial bio-
fluids (such as fluids that mimic human sweat) to evaluate the chemicals that enter the body,
and measurements of crumb rubber particle size to understand if inhalation of small particles
occurs. To accommodate the additional analyses, OEHHA has extended the project
completion date to mid-2019.
What is OEHHA studying?
The study is assessing the potential health impacts associated with playing on synthetic turf
fields and playground mats. It is examining athletic fields and playground mats made from
crumb rubber derived from recycled waste tires. Major parts of the study include:
Identifying and measuring chemicals released from crumb rubber and artificial grass
blades in indoor and outdoor fields and playground mats throughout California.
o Synthetic turf fields of various ages and subjected to various weather conditions
will be studied.
o Air above synthetic turf fields and playgrounds will be monitored for particulate
matter and specific chemicals that can be inhaled.
o The size distribution of the collected particulate matter will be characterized.
Evaluating exposures to chemicals released from crumb rubber and synthetic grass
blades through inhalation, swallowing, and skin contact. This includes consideration of:
o The extent to which individuals (for example athletes and bystanders) are
exposed, based on their activity patterns and how often and long they stay on
the field.
7.1.f
Packet Pg. 251 Attachment: 2017-03-29 Attachment B (Crumb Rubber extension of moratorium)
Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA)
California Environmental Protection Agency
2
o How exposure to the chemicals varies by age groups of athletes and bystanders.
o Movement of chemicals from turf into body fluids.
Evaluating the hazards and toxicological activities of chemicals released from turf. This
includes examining the ways that sensitive populations, such as children, may be more
vulnerable to chemicals released from synthetic turf fields.
Developing a study protocol for measuring chemicals from synthetic turf in urine or
other bodily fluids of athletes, or using personal monitors worn by athletes. (The current
study plan calls for developing a study plan but not undertaking these measurements.
These studies could take place after completion of the current study.)
Conducting an assessment of potential health impacts associated with exposures to
chemicals released from synthetic turf and playground mats, taking into account the
findings of the above activities.
What information will the study provide?
The study is scheduled for completion in mid-2019 with the release of a report on the field
monitoring results, exposure characterization, and health risk assessment. Prior to
completion, OEHHA will release a draft report describing the preliminary data and results of
the study in mid-2018.
The information generated in the study will enable OEHHA to determine the types and
concentrations of chemicals individuals are exposed to when playing on synthetic turf and
playground mats, estimate the level of exposures associated with various activities, and
assess whether these exposures pose potential health risks. CalRecycle will use this
information in making future decisions regarding the use of crumb rubber in synthetic turf and
playground mats.
How is OEHHA obtaining input on the study?
OEHHA began the study by conducting an interactive webinar and public meetings in Los
Angeles, San Diego, and Berkeley to seek input from athletes, coaches, parents and other
interested individuals. OEHHA also convened a panel of scientific experts in exposure and
biomedical sciences to provide input and advice on the study. The first meeting of the panel
was held in February 2016, and there will be additional panel meetings throughout the study.
All meetings of the panel will be held in public, with opportunities for the public to comment.
Has OEHHA studied synthetic turf in the past?
OEHHA conducted two studies on the potential human health effects associated with use of
recycled waste tires in playground and synthetic turf products in 2007 and 2010. These
studies evaluated key aspects of synthetic turf fields, including inhalation of chemicals,
7.1.f
Packet Pg. 252 Attachment: 2017-03-29 Attachment B (Crumb Rubber extension of moratorium)
Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA)
California Environmental Protection Agency
3
bacterial infections, and skin abrasions. OEHHA’s current effort will fill in data gaps and
address the potential risks from chemical exposures resulting from skin contact with, breathing
or ingesting crumb rubber from synthetic turf fields. The California Integrated Waste
Management Board, which has since been reorganized as CalRecycle, also contracted with
OEHHA to perform the previous two studies:
Evaluation of Health Effects of Recycled Waste Tires in Playground and Track
Products, January 2007
Safety Study of Artificial Turf Containing Crumb Rubber Infill Made From Recycled
Tires: Measurements of Chemicals and Particulates in the Air, Bacteria in the Turf, and
Skin Abrasions Caused by Contact with the Surface, October 2010
These studies can be found at: http://oehha.ca.gov/risk-assessment/synthetic-turf-studies.
First Published on: October 20, 2015
Updated on: August 30, 2016
7.1.f
Packet Pg. 253 Attachment: 2017-03-29 Attachment B (Crumb Rubber extension of moratorium)
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 02/20/2018
Approval of Professional Services Agreement for the Edmonds Marsh Study
Staff Lead: Diane Buckshnis
Department: City Council
Preparer: Maureen Judge
Background/History
The City Council has been planning for a Marsh Study to be conducted that will provide scientific
information on the Edmonds Marsh. A Request for Proposals (RFP) was issued in 2017 and, after an
extensive review process, a consultant (Windward) was selected and negotiation began on a
professional services agreement for the project.
Staff Recommendation
Task Force recommends finalizing and approving the Professional Services Agreement including project
scope and calendar with Windward.
Narrative
At the Council's January 16 meeting, the draft materials were discussed again as the original project
proposal came from Windward (Exhibit 1). After deliberations, Council Member Buckshnis and City
Attorney Jeff Taraday were asked to modify Exhibit A to further explain the Council's role in this
scientific study baseline process and a redline version is attached as Exhibit 3. A fee and timeline
schedule (Exhibits 4 & 5) is also attached which may be modified to reflect new dates, as on February
6th the Council voted to approve a 16-month project.
Attachments:
Ex 1 Windward_Edmonds Marsh Proposal
Ex 3 Windward_Scope
Ex 4 Project Schedule
Ex 5 Edmonds Marsh Updated Budget 1_3_18
Ex 2 Updated Windward Professional Services Agreement
7.2
Packet Pg. 254
Proposal
CITY OF EDMONDS
SITE-SPECIFIC, PLANNING-LEVEL SCIENTIFIC STUDY OF THE
EDMONDS MARSH
presented by:
200 West Mercer Street, Suite 401
Seatt le, WA 98119
206.378.1364 (p)
206.973.3048 (f)
www.windwardenv.com
City of Edmonds
August 15, 2017
presented to:
Printed on recycled paper
composed of 100% post-consumer waste
7.2.a
Packet Pg. 255 Attachment: Ex 1 Windward_Edmonds Marsh Proposal (Approval of Professional Services Agreement for the Edmonds Marsh Study)
7.2.a
Packet Pg. 256 Attachment: Ex 1 Windward_Edmonds Marsh Proposal (Approval of Professional Services Agreement for the Edmonds Marsh Study)
Site-Specifi c, Planning-Level Scientifi c Study of the Edmonds Marsh
- 1 -
1 INTRODUCTION
Windward Environmental LLC (Windward) is excited
to submit this proposal in response to the Request for
Proposals (RFP) from the City of Edmonds (City) to
conduct a planning-level assessment of the Edmonds
Marsh (Marsh). Th e RFP is multi-faceted, outlining
several components related to evaluating the ecological
condition of the Marsh, both now and in the future.
Windward is uniquely qualifi ed to provide support to the
City for this work, thanks to the diverse expertise of our
staff in the areas of habitat assessment and restoration
planning, fi eld study design and data collection,
stormwater management, ecological risk assessment
(ERA), and ecosystem services accounting. Th e following
proposal frames our ideas of how to approach the
range of tasks outlined by the City in the RFP. We are
confi dent that our expansive range of expertise, depth of
institutional knowledge, and focus on maintaining good
communication with and service to our clients will allow
us to perform the work to the City’s utmost satisfaction.
For more than 15 years, Windward has provided clients
with high-quality strategic advice on environmental issues
from both scientifi c and regulatory perspectives. We have
a reputation for technical objectivity and excellence, so
our work is given serious consideration by all parties—
even in contested situations. Windward places a great
deal of importance on understanding our clients’ needs
and objectives, because that understanding enables us to
provide insightful, practical solutions to specifi c technical
and regulatory problems.
Our staff are experienced in conducting habitat
assessments and monitoring for a variety of aquatic
and terrestrial environments. We have designed and
implemented monitoring plans to periodically assess
hydrology; water quality; plant and aquatic invertebrate
communities; and habitat availability and use by
amphibians, reptiles, birds, and other wildlife. We have
also conducted baseline surveys in preparation for
project initiation or construction, and then monitored
the site during and aft er project completion to document
changes. Windward’s habitat restoration approach focuses
on assessing both the historical and current conditions
of potential restoration sites, while considering how
the restoration project will fi t within the surrounding
landscape, complement the conservation goals of
local government, and foster goodwill within the local
community. Windward also has a great deal of familiarity
with ecosystem accounting techniques. Our staff are
skilled in using the Habitat Equivalency Analysis (HEA)
and Resource Equivalency Analysis (REA) ecosystem
services models, which can quantify the injury to natural
areas caused by habitat alteration, establish baseline
environmental conditions and ecological functions, and
assess and compare the ecological values of diff erent
restoration scenarios.
Windward staff have extensive experience conducting
fi eld survey and sampling eff orts in both upland and
aquatic environments for a variety of media, including
water, soil, sediment, and biota. We have collected benthic
invertebrates as part of community surveys; gathered
fi sh, crab, mussel, and small mammal tissue for chemical
analysis; and performed macroinvertebrate sampling
to determine the presence of fi sh prey resources. Th ese
eff orts have taken place under a variety of environmental
conditions and ranged in scope from several days’ work
for a 2-person fi eld crew to 6 months of continuous
sampling, involving the coordination of half a dozen boats
and the activities of more than 20 individuals. Windward
staff are also skilled at using site-specifi c environmental
data to assess potential ecological risks to invertebrates,
birds, and mammals.
Our staff are profi cient in applying environmental models
to both simple and complex site-related questions; this
process can help highlight the environmental issues
potentially of the highest concern, and can provide
answers to questions when fi eld-collected data are limited.
Models can be used to predict the fate and transport of
contaminants in the environment, to provide information
about the bioaccumulation of contaminants through the
7.2.a
Packet Pg. 257 Attachment: Ex 1 Windward_Edmonds Marsh Proposal (Approval of Professional Services Agreement for the Edmonds Marsh Study)
Request for Proposal
- 2 -
food web, and to calculate dilution factors in stormwater
receiving waters. Windward has experience with all of
these types of modeling. In addition, Windward staff have
been instrumental in the development and application
of the biotic ligand model, a tool for predicting the
bioavailability and toxicity of metals to aquatic organisms
under various water chemistry conditions.
An introduction to Windward’s key staff is provided
in Section 2. To further demonstrate our qualifi cations
for assisting the City with the tasks outlined in the RFP,
discussion of our related project work is provided in
Section 3. Th e specifi c components for the Marsh project,
both required and optional, are discussed in
Section 4. Th e budget is discussed in Section 5, the
references are provided in Section 6, and the schedule is
outlined in Section 7.
2 KEY STAFF
Th is section provides an overview of our proposed project
team, including a description of each member’s role and
a summary of related expertise. Detailed resumes for all
team members are provided in Appendix A.
Jennifer Love is the proposed project manager.
Ms. Love is an experienced project manager with an
extensive background in habitat restoration, horticulture,
multi-media sampling, site assessment, and stormwater
management. Ms. Love currently manages a 10-year
monitoring program at a stream and wetland restoration
site in Federal Way, Washington (the Karileen Restoration
Project). She has developed costs for restoration
monitoring tasks, compiled and submitted monitoring
reports to the resource and permitting agencies, and
coordinated with multiple site stakeholders. Ms. Love
is trained in wetland delineation and classifi cation and
is familiar with both Washington State and federal
wetland regulations. She has participated in the planning,
permitting, construction, invasive plant removal, and
native plant installation phases of multiple restoration
projects in Western Washington.
Ron Gouguet is the proposed senior advisor.
Mr. Gouguet is a multidisciplinary scientist with nearly 40
years of experience evaluating and quantifying ecosystem
services, primarily within the context of natural resource
damage assessment (NRDA). Mr. Gouguet
uses a variety of methods to evaluate ecosystem services,
such as HEA, REA, relative risk assessment, and
market-based approaches. With his experience as both a
public employee and a private consultant, Mr. Gouguet
has the depth, breadth, and perspective to accomplish
environmental goals while accommodating regulatory,
legal, fi nancial, and ecological circumstances. His unique
approach to resolving natural resource damage (NRD)
claims and other disputes relies on impartially evaluating
scientifi c data, identifying common goals among all
interested parties, and maintaining transparency to
establish trust among the parties.
Th ai Do is the proposed fi eld lead; he will also contribute
to research for and preparation of deliverables. As
an environmental scientist, Mr. Do has managed
numerous site-wide terrestrial and aquatic fi eld studies
to collect biological (e.g., fi sh and invertebrate tissue),
soil, sediment, seep, groundwater, and surface water
data for risk assessments, site characterizations, and
monitoring programs. He has expertise in the design
and implementation of multi-media and -seasonal fi eld
studies, monitoring programs, and sampling eff orts that
rely on a variety of environmental assessment approaches
and sampling techniques. Mr. Do has conducted
numerous assessments that have focused on contaminant
criteria and eff ects on ecological receptors at industrial
sites and waterways throughout the United States. He has
fi eld supervisory training and is also Windward’s health
and safety manager.
Michael Yarnes is the proposed geographic information
system (GIS) analyst; he will also assist with fi eld data
collection. Mr. Yarnes has a background in geography and
12 years of experience in providing geographic expertise
to both public and private entities. His GIS skills include
spatial analysis, data collection and management, 3-D
mapping, and spatial statistics. Mr. Yarnes has worked
on projects involving communication among multiple
agencies, stakeholder groups, and fi rms in order to share
both GIS data and maps. He has also worked as a fi eld
support technician, is skilled in conducting environmental
sampling efforts, and has experience with using
AutoCAD® soft ware to provide clients with 2- and 3-D
products. Prior to joining Windward, Mr. Yarnes worked
with the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) to
orthorectify aerial photos, and helped build wetland maps
for the Bureau of Land Management. Mr. Yarnes has nine
years of experience providing fi eld support, and is skilled
in conducting environmental sampling eff orts.
Jenna Rheuben is a project scientist who will support
fi eld eff orts, research, and deliverable preparation. She has
an educational background in environmental toxicology,
chemistry, and wetland science and management, and has
been involved with ERAs, NRDAs, and bioaccumulation
7.2.a
Packet Pg. 258 Attachment: Ex 1 Windward_Edmonds Marsh Proposal (Approval of Professional Services Agreement for the Edmonds Marsh Study)
Site-Specifi c, Planning-Level Scientifi c Study of the Edmonds Marsh
- 3 -
food web modeling. She is experienced in data analysis, as
well as the presentation of data in graphical and written
formats in both technical documents and platform
presentations. Ms. Rheuben recently completed the
Wetland Science and Management certifi cate program
at the University of Washington, where she gained
experience in wetland science and management issues
such as fi eld wetland delineation methods; wetland
classifi cation and rating; and federal, state, and local
wetland regulations. She also had the opportunity to
study several wetland and riverine restoration projects in
King and Snohomish Counties. Ms. Rheuben has aided
in several fi eld eff orts, including wetland determinations,
stormwater monitoring, and marine sediment and bivalve
sampling.
Nina Maas is a project scientist who will also support
fi eld eff orts, research, and deliverable preparation.
She is an environmental scientist with experience in risk
assessment and environmental monitoring, including
water quality and site assessment. Her broad background
includes work in both the public and private sectors.
Since joining Windward, Ms. Maas has participated
in numerous projects involving ERAs, fi eld sampling,
and large amounts of data collection and management.
Prior to her time at Windward, Ms. Maas performed
many aspects of habitat restoration for the Washington
Conservation Corps., including noxious weed control,
native plant installation, and vegetation monitoring.
3 RELATED PROJECTS
Th e Windward team has years of experience working
on projects with elements similar to those required to
carry out the study of the Marsh and its buff er habitat,
as well as the other components outlined by the City.
Windward staff possess a unique mix of expertise,
including experience in habitat surveys, a range of fi eld
data collection, ecological services accounting, restoration
planning, and stormwater management.
Karileen Restoration Project
In association with the NRDA of the Hylebos Waterway in
Tacoma, Washington, Windward assisted General Metals
of Tacoma in identifying a restoration project that would
compensate for NRD claims made pertaining to one of
its facilities. Th e result, the Karileen Restoration Project,
is a 10-ac restoration site on the west branch of Hylebos
Creek in Federal Way, Washington, that includes wetland,
stream, and upland habitat. Windward helped General
Metals select this restoration project aft er evaluating a
number of potential projects based on:
▪Th e number of potential restoration credits each
project could provide (calculated using the HEA
model)
▪Th e ability of each project to address limiting factors
associated with Chinook salmon habitat (and
habitat for other fi sh and wildlife species) in the
Commencement Bay watershed
▪Th e potential of each project to increase
ecosystem services through habitat restoration
and enhancement, considering factors such as
hydrogeology, plant community composition, fi sh
community composition, and connectivity with
adjacent habitat areas
Once the Karileen Restoration Project had been selected,
Windward worked with the Commencement Bay Natural
Resources Trustee Council (Trustees), permitting
jurisdictions, and local community groups to identify the
best possible scenario for restoration at this site. Th e result
was a publicly supported restoration design that would
provide compensation for the NRD claims by restoring
fi sh and wildlife habitat, in particular salmon spawning
habitat. Windward also produced the project planning
documents, procured the necessary permits, provided
monitoring and oversight during habitat construction,
and developed the 10-year post-restoration monitoring
program for the site. Now in its eighth year
post-restoration, the Karileen Restoration Project is
7.2.a
Packet Pg. 259 Attachment: Ex 1 Windward_Edmonds Marsh Proposal (Approval of Professional Services Agreement for the Edmonds Marsh Study)
Request for Proposal
- 4 -
continuing to develop well and meet its restoration goals.
All monitoring reports submitted to the permitting
agencies and Trustees to date have been approved.
Jennifer Love is the project manager, and Jenna Rheuben
has assisted in the preparation of monitoring reports.
City of Seattle Habitat Evaluation Procedures
and Restoration Cost Estimating
On behalf of the City of Seattle, Windward developed a
standardized Habitat Evaluation Procedure (HEP) for
determining the impacts of and providing mitigation for
development activities that occur within Seattle’s shoreline
jurisdiction. Th e HEP uses habitat units (HUs) that are
based on a method developed by the US Fish and Wildlife
Service (USFWS) to document the quality and quantity
of available habitat for selected wildlife species. Th e HEP
is based on the assumption that the value of habitat to
a given species can be described by a habitat suitability
index (HSI), which can range from 0.0 to 1.0, representing
unsuitable to optimal habitat quality, respectively.
Windward convened a panel of experts to develop
HSI models representing ecological services provided
to juvenile Chinook salmon by Seattle’s estuarine and
marine shorelines. Th e resulting HSI models were used to
evaluate the shorelines on a landscape scale using readily
available GIS data, and on a project-specifi c scale using
site-scale data and drawings from representative shoreline
habitat enhancement projects.
Windward also conducted a restoration cost analysis
as part of this project. Example restoration projects
(i.e., projects that were in the planning phase or already
implemented) within Seattle or its environs were
identifi ed, and the costs of those projects were researched
and compiled to create a searchable database of cost
information. To obtain the most comprehensive and
up-to-date restoration cost information available,
Windward searched for online information and also
contacted project planners directly. Th e costs of all
components of restoration—from planning and
permitting to post-construction monitoring and
maintenance—were included in the database. Th is
analysis will allow the City of Seattle to understand the
potential costs associated with future restoration projects
and the costs per HU for the City of Seattle’s fee-in-lieu
program for mitigating shoreline development.
Ron Gouguet was the senior advisor, Jennifer Love led
the development of the restoration cost database, and
Mike Yarnes was the GIS lead for this project.
Tillamook County Creamery Association
Wetland Monitoring
Windward developed an innovative fi ve-year wetland
monitoring program for the Tillamook County Creamery
Association (TCCA) to evaluate potential eff ects of
discharging wastewater effl uent from the TCCA facility
into an adjacent wetland. Th e monitoring program
was a requirement of TCAA’s National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) waste discharge
permit. Of primary concern was the possibility that
the wastewater effluent would raise the water level
throughout the wetland and possibly the surface water
temperature, thereby altering and possibly negatively
impacting wetland habitat resources for amphibians,
birds, and wildlife, as well as other wetland functions
such as water quality fi ltration. Windward designed the
monitoring plan to evaluate these possible impacts, and
included tasks to assess hydrology; water quality; plant
community composition and structure; the aquatic
invertebrate community; and habitat availability and
site use by amphibians, reptiles, birds, and wildlife. Th e
key element of the wetland monitoring plan was that
qualitative conclusions regarding wetland functions
could be assigned to TCCA wetlands based on a rigorous
quantitative sampling design.
Prior to construction of the effl uent discharge pipe,
Windward conducted a baseline survey of the wetland in
order to assess and document the function and condition
of the wetland prior to wastewater discharge. Th e baseline
survey showed that the wetland provided moderate
to high functions for water quality improvement and
biological habitat. Later, the results of the baseline survey
were compared to those from wetland monitoring events
conducted at 6 months and 1.5, 2.5, 3.5, and 4.5 years
following the initiation of wastewater discharge to the
wetland. Th e comparison results indicated that wetland
functions were not being negatively affected by the
discharge of effluent.
Th ai Do assisted with the vegetation and wildlife surveys
for this project, and also collected hydrology and water
quality measurements.
7.2.a
Packet Pg. 260 Attachment: Ex 1 Windward_Edmonds Marsh Proposal (Approval of Professional Services Agreement for the Edmonds Marsh Study)
Site-Specifi c, Planning-Level Scientifi c Study of the Edmonds Marsh
- 5 -
Armstrong St. Helens Facility Site
Characterization and Remedial Investigation
Windward provided environmental support services
to the Armstrong World Industries St. Helens facility,
which is located on the northern end of Scappoose Bay
in St. Helens, Oregon. Because the site was undergoing
a remedial investigation, human health risk assessment,
and ERAs, Windward conducted habitat surveys to refi ne
the ecological conceptual site model and characterize
the lowland habitat (which contained wetlands) and
its functional value. Plant community surveys were
conducted, and the presence of birds was noted.
Windward also collected and analyzed environmental
data from the site and regional areas—including
surface soil, surface and subsurface sediment, small
mammal (i.e., mouse and shrew), fi sh, and shellfi sh
data—to derive exposure concentrations for humans
and ecological organisms. In support of subsequent
remedial action at the facility, co-located soil/sediment
and tissue concentrations were evaluated to determine any
correlation between tissue and soil chemistry. Windward
also performed a wetland determination in one portion
of the property to determine if cleanup actions would
potentially encroach on wetlands and require regulatory
approval.
Th ai Do served as the fi eld lead for the diff erent sampling
eff orts associated with this project, and Jennifer Love
assisted with small mammal collection and conducted the
wetland determination.
Woodard Bay NRCA Restoration Feasibility
Study
Windward was retained by the Washington State
Department of Natural Resources (WDNR) to complete
an assessment of wood waste impacts as defi ned by the
Washington State Sediment Management Standards
(SMS), and to conduct a feasibility study (FS) to evaluate
restoration options for the nearshore area of the Woodard
Bay Natural Resource Conservation Area (NRCA). Th e
Woodard Bay NRCA consists of hundreds of acres of
undeveloped uplands and tidelands in Henderson Inlet
(near Olympia, Washington), and was used as a log dump
site from 1928 to 1985. Th e overall goal of this FS was
to select an approach to restoring or enhancing aquatic
ecosystem structure, functions, and processes to protect
native species and communities within the NRCA.
Windward developed four restoration options for the site
using HEA. Th ese options were based on site-specifi c
actions that could achieve the restoration goals and
priorities for individual species, habitats, or ecosystem
processes. Th e approach to developing restoration options
involved:
1. Identifying a series of individual restoration actions
that could achieve one or more objectives for one or
more resources
2. Assigning ecosystem service values to each action
3. Compiling individual actions into four alternatives
4. Aggregating the overall change in ecosystem services
for each alternative
5. Developing preliminary unit costs associated with
each alternatives
6. Examining the relative ecosystem benefi t vs. fi nancial
and management costs
Th e alternative that best balanced the overall goals for
the site was identifi ed, and restoration at the Woodard
Bay NRCA began in November of 2012. Since that time,
multiple eff orts have taken place to improve degraded
wetlands and saltwater shoreline habitat. Th e removal
of 2,140 tons of creosote-contaminated materials and of
1,220 pilings from Henderson Inlet at the site has been
completed. Habitat improvements have included the
installation of 50 nesting boxes for purple martins and the
restoration of 30 ac of riparian and upland habitat.
Ron Gouguet served as senior advisor and helped develop
the HEA model and select the remedy for this project, and
Michael Yarnes was the GIS lead.
Seattle-Tacoma International Airport
Construction Stormwater Monitoring
Windward provides support to the Port of Seattle (Port)
to meet the construction stormwater discharge quality
requirements of its NPDES permit and Section 401 Water
Quality Certifi cation, as applicable to master plan update
improvement projects and other construction activities
at the Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (STIA).
Windward performs all monitoring preparation and fi eld
sampling, and provides related support in accordance
with the Port’s standard operating procedures (SOPs)
for construction stormwater monitoring at STIA. Runoff
samples from stormwater drainage system outfalls, as
well as receiving water from upstream and downstream
monitoring locations, are collected and analyzed in the
fi eld for turbidity and pH. If required (based on the
presence or absence of a visual sheen), samples for total
petroleum hydrocarbon analysis are also collected and
7.2.a
Packet Pg. 261 Attachment: Ex 1 Windward_Edmonds Marsh Proposal (Approval of Professional Services Agreement for the Edmonds Marsh Study)
Request for Proposal
- 6 -
submitted to a commercial analytical laboratory. Aft er
each monitoring event, Windward submits construction
monitoring data reports to Port Aviation Division
environmental staff for use in monthly discharge
monitoring reports to the Washington State Department
of Ecology (Ecology).
Windward also provides other services in support of the
Port’s NPDES permit. Th ese include the preparation of
construction stormwater monitoring plans for submittal
to Ecology for planned projects at the 90% design level,
review of individual project or programmatic stormwater
pollution prevention plans (SWPPPs), on-site inspection
of construction site best management practices (BMPs)
and stormwater treatment facilities, monitoring of
construction dewatering discharges and in-stream
construction work, and permit renewal assistance.
Michael Yarnes is the project manager and fi eld lead, and
Jenna Rheuben and Nina Maas provide fi eld support for
this project. Ms. Maas also assists in updating stormwater
permit-related documents.
Task 1 (Baseline Analysis), as the information gathered
during Task 2 will be valuable in helping to inform the
study design for Task 1. If we are selected for this project,
our fi rst action will be to hold a kick-off meeting with City
staff to ensure that we clearly understand the overall goals
for the project, and to develop data quality objectives for
the baseline analysis. In addition, we will confi rm that the
data and other information to be collected throughout
the project will support the City in its decision-making
processes related to the Marsh and its buff ers.
Task 1: Baseline Analysis
Th e broad ecological functions currently being performed
by the Marsh will be evaluated by implementing a baseline
wetland monitoring study. Water level and quality,
vegetation, and invertebrate data will be collected, and
fi sh and wildlife surveys will be performed as part of
the study. In addition, conventional sediment chemistry
data (e.g., total organic carbon [TOC], grain size, etc.)
will be collected, and sediment redox profi les will be
determined.
Western Washington University recently published
a report on various management facets of the Marsh
(Western SCP 2017). Two sections of the report will be
particularly useful for this eff ort, namely Sea Level Rise
and the Edmonds Marsh: An Issue Beyond Traditional
Planning Horizons and Vegetation in the Edmonds Salt
Marsh: Invasives Management, Native Reintroduction, &
Planning for the Future. Each provides excellent examples
of the fi eld work and analyses necessary to establish
physico-chemical and vegetative baseline conditions.
Additionally, the report presents Marsh elevation and
vegetation mapping information that will be useful.
Th e fi rst step in completing this task will be to develop
a baseline wetland monitoring plan that will include
detailed methods about how and when data will be
collected. Th e monitoring plan will be developed in
coordination with City staff and other stakeholders to
ensure that it meets the requested goals and objectives of
the baseline study. It is anticipated that the baseline study
will be conducted over the course of one year, in order
to gather data about conditions within the Marsh during
all four seasons. Th e monitoring plan will further detail
which monitoring parameters will be collected when, and
how frequently they will be collected throughout the year.
It will also identify specifi c monitoring locations for each
of the metrics described herein, and will expand on the
monitoring methods to be followed. A major goal for the
monitoring plan will be to select and describe monitoring
4 APPROACH FOR EDMONDS MARSH
STUDY
Th e following subsections describe our approach to the
scope of work outlined in the RFP. Th e approaches for
Components 1 through 4 (the required components of the
RFP) are described in the correspondingly numbered task
sections. Methods for the accomplishment of
Components 5 and 9 are also included, described under
Tasks 5 and 6, respectively.
In general, Windward will implement these tasks in the
order in which they are listed; however, we feel that it
would be benefi cial to implement Task 2 (Evaluation of
Site-Specifi c Buff ers for Ecological Functions) prior to
7.2.a
Packet Pg. 262 Attachment: Ex 1 Windward_Edmonds Marsh Proposal (Approval of Professional Services Agreement for the Edmonds Marsh Study)
Site-Specifi c, Planning-Level Scientifi c Study of the Edmonds Marsh
- 7 -
methods that are easy to implement and that can be
repeated easily so that comparative data can be collected
in the future.
In order to monitor water levels in the Marsh, water level
staff gages and data loggers will be installed at multiple
locations, primarily in areas where water fl ows into or
out of the Marsh, and in at least one location within the
Marsh interior; Western SCP (2017) shows a reasonable
deployment pattern for continuous data loggers.
Additionally, water level data will be collected manually
at least once during each season of the year at the staff
gage locations. Data collection dates will be selected to
capture both high fl ow/high water and low fl ow/low water
conditions.
Instantaneous water parameter measurements will be
made for water temperature, pH, conductivity, salinity,
and dissolved oxygen (DO) using a YSI Professional Plus
Multiparameter® water quality meter. Water quality will be
measured at each of the water level gage stations and at a
few additional locations selected in the fi eld, if necessary
for adequate coverage, particularly near areas where
stormwater outfalls are located or where large quantities
of surface water runoff enter the Marsh.
Th e sediment redox interface depth will be determined
using either visual observations (e.g., shallow sediment
profi le imaging) or redox vs. sediment depth profi les
collected using a pH/oxidizing-reduction potential (ORP)
meter (e.g., Hach® HQ11D Portable pH meter with ORP).
Knowing the depth of the redox interface is useful when
documenting sediment habitat values and how they
change over time.
Th e fi rst step in performing the necessary vegetation
surveys will be to acquire spatial data used by Western
SCP (2017) to map the diff erent vegetation types within
the Marsh. Th ese data will be compared to available
high-resolution aerial photographs of the Marsh and its
existing vegetated buff ers. Qualitative vegetation surveys
will then be performed to ground-truth the fi ndings of
the default map and aerial photo survey. Quantitative
vegetation monitoring (e.g., percent cover surveys)
will also be conducted in the riparian and upland areas
surrounding the Marsh using established transects lines,
with monitoring plots located along the transects. Th e
acreage of each habitat type/vegetation community
within the Marsh will be determined using the updated
vegetation map.
Th e invertebrate community within the Marsh will also be
surveyed. A sweep net will be used to collect invertebrates
from the water column and submersed plants. To
supplement the sweep net method, corers will be used
to sample both the water column and the top 10 cm of
sediment for benthic and water column invertebrates.
Invertebrates collected in sweep nets and sediment corer
samples will be passed through a series of sieves (US
Standard Nos. 18, 30, and 70) to separate the organisms
from sediment and organic matter, and will be preserved
in 70% ethanol. Samples will be sent to EcoAnalysts, Inc.
of Moscow, Idaho, for taxonomic identifi cation. Taxa will
be identifi ed to the genus (species level when practical),
and interpretation will focus on the presence or absence
of particular species. Th e baseline survey of wetland
invertebrates will allow comparisons to be made among
the invertebrate communities in diff erent areas of the
Marsh (e.g., areas with diff erent buff er conditions, water
depths, and plant communities),1 and will also provide
important insight regarding the food resources available
to other wetland fauna.
Fish and wildlife surveys will also be conducted as part of
the baseline study. Observations of reptiles, amphibians,
and birds (including adults, juveniles, and eggs) made at
any time during the monitoring events will be recorded
in the fi eld notebook and summarized in the monitoring
reports. Individuals observed will be identifi ed to the
species level whenever possible. Bird point count surveys
may also be incorporated into the monitoring plan,
depending on the importance of such information to the
City.
Although fi sh migration into the Marsh from the Puget
Sound is severely limited by the submerged outlet of
Willow Creek and a tide gate, aft er implementation of the
Willow Creek daylighting project and replacement of the
old tide gate with a new one, fi sh passage is expected to
increase. Th erefore, if the baseline study is conducted aft er
the daylighting project has been completed, it will include
visual surveys for both juvenile and adult salmonids.2
Th ese surveys will begin at the Marsh and progress
downstream through the daylighted creek channel, if
1 Th e National Database of Wetland Invertebrate Sensitivities to
Enrichment and Hydrologic Alteration (EPA 2002)
provides information on the sensitivity of assemblages of
wetland invertebrates, particularly to hydrologic alteration and
enrichment. Th is database can be used to qualitatively
determine the relative proportions of sensitive and tolerant
species present in the Marsh.
2 Based on information provided in the Willow Creek
Daylighting FS (Shannon & Wilson 2015), adult and juvenile
coho salmon, an occasional adult chum salmon, and resident
and sea-run cutthroat trout have been observed in the Marsh.
7.2.a
Packet Pg. 263 Attachment: Ex 1 Windward_Edmonds Marsh Proposal (Approval of Professional Services Agreement for the Edmonds Marsh Study)
Request for Proposal
- 8 -
access is permitted. Th e timing of these salmonid surveys
will be determined in coordination with local fi shery
biologists, such as those from the Suquamish Tribe.
Observations of any other fi sh species (e.g., three-spined
stickleback and sculpin) made during the salmonid
surveys will also be recorded.
Th e baseline study will also establish photopoint stations
throughout and along the perimeter of the Marsh. To
facilitate comparison, photos will be taken facing the same
cardinal directions from each photopoint station during
every monitoring event. Photos are quick and easy to take,
and they oft en provide a wealth of information and assist
in the interpretation of quantitative data.
Deliverables
A baseline wetland monitoring plan will be developed
to guide fi eld data collection eff orts. Th e results of the
baseline wetland monitoring study will be presented
in a data report. Th e report will include a qualitative
evaluation of the ecological functions being provided by
the Marsh in its baseline condition, based on the data
collected. For example, for each metric monitored, the
ecological functions of the Marsh can be rated as “high,”
“medium,” or “low” by comparing the baseline data for the
Marsh to data from one or more reference marshes or data
in the scientifi c literature. In addition, the results of the
baseline survey can be compared to those of similar future
surveys. Th ese comparisons will assess changes in the
Marsh, such as those that will occur aft er the daylighting
of Willow Creek, the installation of the Dayton Street
stormwater pump, and any other future restoration or
development activities.
Task 2: Evaluation of Site-specifi c Buff ers for
Ecological Functions
Th is task will consist of two steps: 1) the preparation
of a white paper summarizing the available scientifi c
literature on wetland buff er functions and recommended
buff er widths, and 2) a site-specifi c evaluation of the
Marsh, its surrounding land uses and land ownership,
and opportunities for buff er restoration or enhancement.
Windward anticipates that while these steps will result in
two separate deliverables, the site-specifi c evaluation will
rely heavily on the literature summarized in the white
paper when making recommendations about Marsh buff er
widths and buff er restoration opportunities.
Th e White Paper
Th e white paper will synthesize and summarize
information about the functions and recommended
widths of wetland buff ers; this information will be
gathered from a thorough review of scientifi c literature
and guidance documents dealing with the topic.
Documents specifi c to the Pacifi c Northwest and western
United States will be prioritized. As much as possible,
the white paper will include information about the range
of buff er widths necessary to support the following
ecological functions:
1. Improving water quality (removing sediment,
nutrients, and toxics)
2. Maintaining an appropriate microclimate
3. Providing a screen suffi cient to prevent the
disturbance of wildlife that use the Marsh
4. Maintaining habitat connectivity and critical habitat
for species that use the Marsh as forage habitat,
breeding habitat, and refuge/shelter
Th e white paper will also summarize the available
information pertaining to buff er widths that have been
found to be insuffi cient to provide the four ecological
functions listed herein. Ideally, buff er width information
will be summarized in a table that will rate the quality of
specifi c buff er width ranges as “high,” “medium,” or “low”
for each of the four ecological functions.
Site-specifi c Evaluation
Th e site-specifi c evaluation of the Marsh will evaluate
the extent of the current Marsh buff ers, as well as land
uses and ownership immediately adjacent to the Marsh,
extending at least 125 ft from the Marsh perimeter in
all directions (125 ft is the combined distance of the
110-ft buff er and 15-ft setback proposed by the City for
7.2.a
Packet Pg. 264 Attachment: Ex 1 Windward_Edmonds Marsh Proposal (Approval of Professional Services Agreement for the Edmonds Marsh Study)
Site-Specifi c, Planning-Level Scientifi c Study of the Edmonds Marsh
- 9 -
the Marsh). A map will be developed to clearly outline
existing Marsh buff ers and illustrate adjacent land uses
and ownership; this map will be based on the map
attached to this RFP. Any stormwater outfalls or areas
where stormwater is known to fl ow overland into the
Marsh will also be mapped. Th e ability of existing Marsh
buff ers to provide the four ecological functions listed
will be evaluated by combining fi ndings from the white
paper with information about existing buff er widths
and conditions. Th e site-specifi c evaluation will identify
opportunities for buff er extension and restoration, and
will make specifi c recommendations for such activities.
Th e evaluation will also consider what impacts the Marsh
could experience if existing buff ers were to be aff ected
by new development or other land use changes, or if
proposed mitigation for a development project were to
include relatively narrow buff ers.3
Deliverables
Th e deliverables for this task will include the white paper
summarizing available scientifi c information about
wetland buff er functions, and a technical report with
detailed maps presenting the results of the site-specifi c
evaluation.
Task 3: 2019 SMP Update Information
Th e information gathered during Tasks 1 and 2—such
as the current conditions of the Marsh and its existing
buff ers, as well as recommendations for restoration
opportunities within buff er areas—will be available to
help inform the 2019 Shoreline Master Program (SMP)
update. Th erefore, Task 3 will require a relatively low
level of eff ort, which will include summarizing pertinent
information from Tasks 1 and 2 in a format that will be
easily incorporated into the 2019 SMP update. Windward
will work with City staff to ensure that the information
summarized as part of this task is appropriate for
incorporation into the 2019 SMP update.
Deliverables
Th e deliverables for this task will be text sections that can
be directly incorporated into the 2019 SMP update, as well
as an updated GIS map of the Marsh and its surroundings
(if the City desires such a map to be included in the
update).
3 For the purposes of this approach, “relatively narrow buff ers”
are considered to be those less than 110 ft with a 15-ft setback,
as outlined in Option M of the FS (Shannon & Wilson 2015).
Task 4: Willow Creek Daylighting Impacts
Th e Willow Creek daylighting project is expected to
increase the Marsh’s inundation area by approximately
2.5 ac, shift habitat areas that are currently freshwater and
dominated by cattail to salt marsh habitat, and improve
fi sh access to both the creek and the Marsh. Th e new
daylighted channel (based on the preferred alignment
alternative Option C described in the FS [Shannon &
Wilson 2015]) will run midway through Marina Beach
Park and discharge into Puget Sound to the south of the
Edmonds Marina.
Th e changes in the Marsh’s inundation area (slight
expansions to the south and east [Shannon & Wilson
2015]) may similarly shift the locations of the buff ers
needed to protect the Marsh and to comply with the City’s
required setbacks. Aft er the daylighting project has been
completed, it will be possible to further evaluate such
buff er location changes by observing the new boundaries
of the marsh’s inundation area. In addition, installing a
dense riparian buff er of native plant species along each
bank of the creek will enhance the ability of the daylighted
channel to provide suitable habitat for fi sh, invertebrates,
and other wildlife. Such a buff er will reduce stream
temperature fl uctuations, provide food and habitat for
insects and other invertebrates (prey sources for fi sh),
increase inputs of detritus to the creek, and provide
other water quality improvements and habitat structure
within the channel. Th erefore, Windward’s analysis will
recommend that an area along both banks of the creek be
considered for the installation of buff er plantings.
One approach to analyzing how the Willow Creek
daylighting project may aff ect ecological functions and
conditions within the Marsh will be to repeat the baseline
study outlined under Task 1 in the years following the
completion of the daylighting project (assuming the
7.2.a
Packet Pg. 265 Attachment: Ex 1 Windward_Edmonds Marsh Proposal (Approval of Professional Services Agreement for the Edmonds Marsh Study)
Request for Proposal
- 10 -
baseline data is collected prior to daylighting of the
creek).4 Post-daylighting data will then be compared to
baseline data in order to help evaluate changes in Marsh
conditions. Salinity levels, water levels and temperature,
vegetation zones, and fi sh access are all parameters likely
to change as a result of the daylighting project.
Another approach that could be used for this task
would be to employ models such as those for REA or
HEA, coupled with GIS, to quantitatively estimate the
ecosystem service units that will be gained. REA typically
uses a resource metric (e.g., juvenile coho salmon) that
has had a population or quantity change. Th e model
equates the quantity of services lost due to past habitat
impacts with the quantity that will be created by proposed
compensatory restoration project (or in this case, the
Willow Creek daylighting project). HEA is a version of
REA that uses a habitat metric, such as acres of land, and
analyzes a change in services provided by that habitat,
such as a percent reduction in services as a result of a
habitat injury.
Information gathered during Tasks 1 and 2, as well as
any fi eld data collected aft er completion of the Willow
Creek daylighting project, could be used to construct a
GIS-based REA/HEA model would refl ect baseline Marsh
services, including support of plant or animal populations.
Using the ecosystem changes that are anticipated to occur
in the Marsh in response to the daylighting of Willow
Creek, the model would also refl ect the increased value of
various metrics (i.e., productivity, biomass, etc.). A REA/
HEA model would allow ecosystem service credits5 to be
calculated once the City implements the Willow Creek
daylighting project. Th e quantity of ecosystem services
generated by the project would be derived by comparing
the resource functions of the baseline Marsh condition
with the estimated future functions of the Marsh based
on the literature and best professional judgement. Th e use
of a REA/HEA model is an optional component of this
approach that could be conducted either with or without
the collection of post-daylighting fi eld data.
4 An adapted version of the baseline wetland monitoring study
described under Task 1 could also be developed, allowing the
daylighted creek to be included in future monitoring eff orts.
5 Credits generated by the daylighting of Willow Creek and
enumerated using a REA or similar ecosystem services model
could possibly be used by the City to satisfy future mitigation
requirements.
Deliverables
If additional fi eld monitoring data are collected, a data
evaluation report will be produced that summarizes the
baseline and post-daylighting data; the report will include
comparison and interpretation of the results. If a REA is
performed, the process used to develop the model and the
results will both be summarized for the City in a technical
memorandum.
Task 5: Vegetation Enhancement Project
Impacts (Optional Component 5)
Using information gathered during Task 2, Windward
will work to identify specifi c areas around the Marsh
where denser, more diverse, or otherwise better-quality
buff ers—which can be installed through volunteer
vegetation enhancement projects—can serve to improve
ecological functions within the marsh, or possibly reduce
or otherwise alter the buff er widths necessary to protect
and maintain those functions. For example, specifi c areas
of the Marsh (e.g., along Edmonds Way or the trail at the
perimeter of Harbor Square) are particularly aff ected by
nearby human activity. At such locales, the installation
or enhancement of a very dense buff er of native shrubs
and trees will signifi cantly reduce disturbances to wildlife.
Scientifi c material gathered as part of Task 2 will provide
valuable information on both the quality and width of
buff er necessary to protect specifi c ecological functions;
this information will be used to guide this eff ort. Task 5
could be completed at the same time as Task 3, and would
likely provide information that could be included in the
2019 SMP update.
Deliverables
Th e deliverable for this task will be a short report or
technical memorandum summarizing recommendations
for vegetation enhancement projects around the Marsh
and the anticipated impacts of those projects.
In addition, if the baseline study of the Marsh (Task 1)
were to be repeated aft er each of the activities described
under Optional Components 6, 7, and 8 of the RFP,
Windward could use the amassed information to analyze
the eff ects of those activities on the ecological functions
of and conditions within the Marsh. Data gathered from
the repeated baseline study could then be compared, and
changes—such as expansion of the tidal prism, deepening
redox interfaces and increased oxidation of surface
sediment, or changes in the plant community—could be
identifi ed. HEA/REA models could also be used to help
quantify the increase in ecological functions resulting
7.2.a
Packet Pg. 266 Attachment: Ex 1 Windward_Edmonds Marsh Proposal (Approval of Professional Services Agreement for the Edmonds Marsh Study)
Site-Specifi c, Planning-Level Scientifi c Study of the Edmonds Marsh
- 11 -
from those activities, and the spatial extent of the change.
As these are preliminary suggestions, no formal proposal,
budget, or timeline are included herein for Optional
Components 6, 7, and 8. However, once the initial task
work outlined in this proposal has been completed and
a better understanding of the baseline conditions of the
Marsh has been established, Windward would be happy to
further develop ideas for addressing these components.
Task 6: Preparation for a Long-term Watershed
Management Study (Optional Component 9)
Windward understands that the residents of Edmonds
are very interested in any activities conducted either
in or around the Marsh, and that there is a range of
diff erent interests and opinions in play. We realize that
whereas some people in the community strongly favor the
preservation and restoration of the Marsh and as much of
its surroundings as possible, others favor protecting the
Marsh while making allowances for nearby development.
Any long-term plans for the Marsh and its watershed will
have to explore and consider compromises that will garner
public support from all corners.
In order to help determine an initial scope and process
for developing a long-term watershed management study
and strategy, Windward will work closely with City staff
to ensure that we understand the broad range of issues
related to the Marsh and its watershed, and to identify
the best options for engaging the public in a management
planning process. Information regarding the Marsh,
Willow Creek, and Shellabarger Creek provided in the
City’s Shoreline Master Program Restoration Plan (City of
Edmonds 2015), Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan
(City of Edmonds 2016a), City of Edmonds Comprehensive
Plan (City of Edmonds 2016b), and Storm and Surface
Water Comprehensive Management Plan (Herrera and City
of Edmonds 2010) will also be reviewed to help establish
the steps and scope of the study plan, and to further
develop a list of stakeholders.
Deliverables
Th e deliverable for this task will be a memorandum
summarizing the goals and plans for the Marsh, Willow
Creek, and Shellabarger Creek specifi ed in existing City
documents; an overview of stakeholders involved
to-date in plans for the Marsh and its tributaries; ideas for
public outreach activities (e.g., online surveys, community
meetings) that could help further develop a strategy for
the Marsh and its watershed; and an outline of the scope
and process that could be used to develop a long-term
watershed management study.
7.2.a
Packet Pg. 267 Attachment: Ex 1 Windward_Edmonds Marsh Proposal (Approval of Professional Services Agreement for the Edmonds Marsh Study)
Request for Proposal
- 12 -
5 BUDGET
Task Proposed Budget
a
Task 1: Baseline Analysis $153,804
Task 2: Evaluation of Site-specifi c Buff ers for
Ecological Functions $44,319
Task 3: 2019 SMP Update Information $8,180
Task 4: Willow Creek Daylighting Impacts $98,171
b
Task 5: Optional Project Component No. 5 $14,370
Task 6: Optional Project Component No. 9 $29,950
Grand Total: $348,793
a Additional detail regarding the proposed budgets for these tasks is available upon request.
b Th e budget for this task would be lower ($21,540) if the REA model analysis approach alone were selected by the
City as the preferred approach.
6 PROJECT REFERENCES
Below is the contact information for three client references for Windward projects that involved professional services
similar to those defi ned in the RFP. We encourage you to contact these individuals inasmuch they can best speak to the
high quality of our technical work and client service.
Karileen Restoration Project
Bryan Graham
Schnitzer Steel Industries
1902 Marine View Drive
Tacoma, WA 98422
253.404.6686
bgraham@schn.com
City of Seattle Habitat Evaluation Procedure and Restoration Cost Estimating
Maggie Glowacki
City of Seattle Dept. of Construction and Inspections
P.O. Box 34019
Seattle, WA 98124
206.386.4036
margaret.glowacki@seattle.gov
Armstrong St. Helens Facility Site Characterization and Remedial Investigation
Ross Rieke
Rieke Consulting Services LLC
10457 Southwest Lady Marion Drive
Tigard, OR 97224
503.329.1550
rrieke@riekecs.com
7.2.a
Packet Pg. 268 Attachment: Ex 1 Windward_Edmonds Marsh Proposal (Approval of Professional Services Agreement for the Edmonds Marsh Study)
Site-Specifi c, Planning-Level Scientifi c Study of the Edmonds Marsh
- 13 -7 SCHEDULE/TIMELINESeptNov DecJan2018Jan2019Feb Mar April MayJun JulAugOct SeptNov DecJan2020Feb Mar April MayJun JulAug OctSeptNov DecJan2021FebFebMar April MayJun JulAug Octa The dates for completing this task can be moved to earlier in 2019 if needed based on the SMP update schedule.b It is assumed that the Willow Creek daylighting project will be implemented in the summer of 2019, and that 1 additional year of field data will be collected after the project has been completed.c It is assumed that it would best serve the City to make preparations for a long-term watershed management study after all other project tasks have been complete. However, if necessary, such preparations could be completed at almost any time during the overall life of the project, as they are understood to compose a relatively independent task.Feb 19 - Mar 30Task 3aTask 6cTask 5Daylighting of Willow Creek (assumed)Jul 1 - Jul 15Jul 1 - Jul 15Task 4bOct 1 - Dec 4 Dec 7 - Jan 29Task 1:field effortTask 1:data reportApr 2 - Mar 30 Apr 2 - Jun 28Kick-offMeetingwith CityProjectApprovalby CityTask 2Jan 1Jan 15-16Jan 8Task 1:developmonitoringstudy7.2.a
Packet Pg. 269 Attachment: Ex 1 Windward_Edmonds Marsh Proposal (Approval of Professional Services Agreement for the Edmonds Marsh Study)
Edmonds MarshHarbor SquareUnocal SiteWillow CreekFishHatcheryEdmondsCity ParkEdmondsMarinaEdmondsWastewaterTreatmentPlant¬«104Edmonds Marsh site mapDRAFTPrepared by mikey, 8/11/2017; W:\Marketing\Proposals\2017\Edmonds Marsh\GIS\6659_SiteMap.mxd±0 0.05 0.1Miles0 400 800FeetParcelLLCenvironmental Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User CommunityContent may not reflect National Geographic's current map policy. Sources: National Geographic, Esri, DeLorme, HERE, UNEP-WCMC, USGS,NASA, ESA, METI, NRCAN, GEBCO, NOAA, increment P Corp., Snohomish County[7.2.aPacket Pg. 270Attachment: Ex 1 Windward_Edmonds Marsh Proposal (Approval of Professional Services Agreement for
Appendix A – Resumes
7.2.a
Packet Pg. 271 Attachment: Ex 1 Windward_Edmonds Marsh Proposal (Approval of Professional Services Agreement for the Edmonds Marsh Study)
7.2.a
Packet Pg. 272 Attachment: Ex 1 Windward_Edmonds Marsh Proposal (Approval of Professional Services Agreement for the Edmonds Marsh Study)
Resume
Jennifer Love, MS
Senior Associate/Environmental Scientist
Summary of Expertise
Ms. Love is an environmental scientist with 12 years’ diverse experience
in environmental assessment, habitat restoration project planning and
design, natural resource damage assessment (NRDA), horticulture,
remedial investigation, source control evaluation, stormwater permitt ing
and compliance, and multimedia sampling. She has participated in the
planning, permitt ing, construction, invasive plant removal, and native
plant installation phases of various restoration projects in wetland,
stream, and upland forested habitat areas. She has also conducted site
assessments at a variety of sites for the purpose of assessing ecological
conditions and screening for the presence of chemical contamination.
Ms. Love has participated in a number of environmental sampling eff orts
involving sediment, groundwater, surface water, and biota.
As part of her work in NRDA, Ms. Love has been involved in identifying,
prioritizing, planning, and producing conceptual designs for ecological
restoration projects across the country. She has evaluated restoration
projects using decision matrix analyses, cost-benefi t rankings, and other
techniques using criteria such as ecological signifi cance, feasibility,
project cost, and social benefi t. She has worked with Natural Resource
Trustee groups in both the planning and monitoring phases of natural
resource damage (NRD) habitat restoration projects. Ms. Love also
has experience using the Habitat Equivalency Analysis (HEA) model
to evaluate the potential restoration credit of habitat projects, and she
has assisted in the planning, permitt ing, construction oversight, and
monitoring of stream and wetland restoration projects in Western
Washington. She is also practiced in plant and avian identifi cation, has
been trained in wetland delineation and classifi cation techniques, and is
familiar with state and federal wetland regulations.
Ms. Love has been involved in source control evaluations conducted in
association with Superfund sediment sites and individual properties,
and has evaluated information on general sources and pathways of
contaminants present in urban and industrialized areas. She also has a
strong background in stormwater permitt ing and compliance under the
industrial stormwater general National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System (NPDES) permit, and has prepared and updated stormwater
pollution prevention plans and spill prevention and emergency control
plans, produced and delivered employee training presentations, and
conducted stormwater and storm solids sampling and discharge
monitoring reporting.
Project Experience
Karileen Restoration Project
Ms. Love is the project manager for a stream and wetland restoration
project on the West Branch of Hylebos Creek in Federal Way,
Washington. She was involved in compiling the biological assessment,
wetland delineation, and monitoring work plan reports during the
planning phase of the project. Species of concern at the site included
Chinook salmon, bull trout, western toad, and bald eagle. Ms. Love was
also active in the permitt ing process and worked with representatives
from various regulatory agencies to address their comments on elements
of the proposed project plan. She was also involved in planning
for invasive plant species removal at the site and other elements of
Areas of Specialization
▪Restoration design, planning,
and monitoring
▪Environmental assessment
▪Multi-media sampling
▪Source control research and
assessment
▪Stormwater permitt ing
compliance
Education
▪How to Determine the
Ordinary High Water Mark,
Coastal Training Program,
Washington, 2013
▪MS, Environmental
Horticulture and Certifi cate
in Restoration Ecology,
University of Washington, 2011
▪Wetland Mitigation,
Construction, and Installation
Course, Portland State
University Wetland, River
and Watershed Professional
Development Program, 2008
▪Wetland Delineation Course,
University of Washington
Extension School, 2006
▪BS, Environmental Science,
Western Washington
University, 2003
Work History
▪Environmental Scientist
and Associate, Windward
Environmental LLC,
2006-present
▪Environmental Scientist, Tetra
Tech, Inc., 2005-2006
▪Research Scientist, University
of Washington, 2003-2005
7.2.a
Packet Pg. 273 Attachment: Ex 1 Windward_Edmonds Marsh Proposal (Approval of Professional Services Agreement for the Edmonds Marsh Study)
Resume
Jennifer Love, MS (cont.)
Senior Associate/Environmental Scientist
project construction. During the construction phase, Ms. Love provided construction coordination and oversight
documentation and also assisted with permit-required fi sh and water quality monitoring. Post-restoration,
she has assisted with the collection of monitoring data and has prepared annual monitoring reports, making
recommendations for adaptive management, when needed. The project is in its 8th year of post-construction
monitoring and maintenance, and the site is developing well and meeting its restoration goals. All monitoring
reports submitt ed to the permitt ing agencies and NRD Trustees to date have been approved.
Armstrong St. Helens Facility Site Characterization
In support of an ongoing contaminated site investigation at an industrial facility in St. Helens, Oregon, Ms. Love
assisted in the collection of white-footed mice as part of an ecological risk assessment (ERA). Sampling eff orts
included constructing pit traps and drift nets to catch specimens, and documenting site conditions through fi eld
notes and photographs. In support of an early remedial action, Ms. Love also conducted a wetland determination
in one portion of the property to determine if cleanup actions would potentially encroach on wetlands and
require regulatory approval. Evaluations were performed to determine the presence or absence of the hydric soil,
hydrophytic vegetation, and wetland hydrology indicators at several locations around the perimeter of a proposed
project area. The determination was complicated by the presence of historical fi ll material and an abundance of
invasive species (e.g., Himalayan blackberry, reed canarygrass). Ms. Love also developed a revegetation plan for
installing native plants within the footprint of the proposed project area after cleanup actions have been completed.
City of Seatt le Habitat Evaluation Procedures
Ms. Love led the eff ort to create a restoration cost database for the City of Seatt le to support sett ing appropriate costs
for its fee-in-lieu program. This task required identifying appropriate example restoration projects (i.e., projects
that were in the planning phase or that had been implemented) in the City of Seatt le and nearby jurisdictions.
Once a suite of example restoration projects had been identifi ed, each had to be thoroughly researched in order to
compile detailed line item cost information for each phase of the project: from planning, permitt ing, and design
to implementation and post-restoration monitoring. Costs were compiled by using online resources such as the
Washington State Recreation and Conservation Offi ce’s Project Information System (PRISM) database, by reviewing
project planning documents, and in many cases, by contacting the project planners directly to request cost data
and check the accuracy of information found online. Once cost information had been compiled, it was entered
into an Excel® database that Ms. Love helped design in consultation with the City of Seatt le project manager to
be both comprehensive and user-friendly. In addition to her work on the cost database, Ms. Love assisted with
the convention of a panel of experts to develop Habitat Suitability Index (HIS) models representative of ecological
services provided to juvenile Chinook salmon by the City of Seatt le’s estuarine and marine shorelines.
NRDA for Former Paper Mill, Port Angeles, Washington
Ms. Love is assisting with the conceptual design and project planning for a stream and estuary restoration project
in Port Angeles, Washington. The stream runs through a former mill site and has been degraded by bank armoring
structures, numerous over-water crossings, and loss of riparian habitat. Ms. Love is working with federal, state, and
tribal agencies to help establish a conceptual restoration design that is ecologically appropriate and acceptable to all
parties. She is also involved in developing the planning documents for the restoration project.
Stormwater Quality Support Services
For the past 9 years, Ms. Love has been involved with several stormwater quality support services at an industrial
site along the Duwamish River in Washington State. She helped develop and regularly updates the facility’s
stormwater pollution prevention plan (SWPPP), including the spill prevention and emergency cleanup plan
(an att achment to the SWPPP), in compliance with the facility’s National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
(NPDES) permit. These documents are routinely reviewed and updated to ensure that they refl ect any changes in
site conditions, upgrades in best management practices (BMPs), and changes in permit requirements, etc. Ms. Love
also conducts stormwater sampling and prepares discharge monitoring reports for submitt al to the Washington
State Department of Ecology, and performs monthly site inspections and other general record-keeping requirements
under the permit. She develops and delivers annual employee training presentations as required by the NPDES
permit to help familiarize staff with permit requirements and SWPPP practices. She has been involved in the clean
out and mapping of catch basins and drainage lines at the facility and in the clean out and maintenance of the
stormwater treatment facilities.
7.2.a
Packet Pg. 274 Attachment: Ex 1 Windward_Edmonds Marsh Proposal (Approval of Professional Services Agreement for the Edmonds Marsh Study)
Resume
Ron Gouguet
Partner
Summary of Expertise
Mr. Gouguet is a multidisciplinary scientist who focuses on a consensus
driven approach to natural resource damage assessment (NRDA) and on
the integration of site cleanup with restoration of ecological function. With
nearly 40 years of experience as a public servant and a private consultant,
Mr. Gouguet has the depth, breadth, and perspective to meet environmental
goals while accommodating regulatory, legal, fi nancial, and ecological
circumstances.
Whether as a trustee of public benefi ts or on behalf of a responsible party,
Mr. Gouguet evaluates data impartially, identifi es common goals, and
establishes trust among all interested parties. He then advocates the use of
shared databases, GIS, and other information visualization techniques to
transparently share information, reach consensus, and promote informed
decisions.
Mr. Gouguet uses various methods to quantify material and intangible
benefi ts provided by functioning natural systems (“ecosystem services”)
such as Habitat Equivalency Analysis (HEA), Resource Equivalency Analysis
(REA), relative risk assessment, and market-based approaches.
During the fi rst 16 years of his NRDA career, Mr. Gouguet helped direct
integrated remediation and restoration planning eff orts at federal and
state-lead sites throughout the country. During that time, he gained in-depth
experience working with att orneys to complete the legally required damage
assessment, sett lement, and restoration planning steps.
Since then, Mr. Gouguet has worked with and for private clients to achieve
similar goals using similar approaches. While building consensus among
natural resource trustee representatives remains the preferred path to claim
resolution, Mr. Gouguet also undertakes defensive NRDA activities and
evaluates potential trustee claims using natural resource damage (NRD)
scaling tools like those used by trustees.
The US Department of Justice, US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA),
and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) have
acknowledged Mr. Gouguet’s success by awarding him several bronze
medals for his contributions to successful remediation and restoration
projects.
Project Experience
NRDA for Former Paper Mill, Port Angeles, Washington
As NRDA lead, Mr. Gouguet holds responsibility for building a
harbor-wide NRD evaluation tool using existing information; he is
working in cooperation with the Natural Resource Trustee Council. Mr.
Gouguet is also charged with developing multiple visions of the fully
restored site, and with calculating the restoration values of potential
coastal habitat mosaics. At present, the NRD claims of the Natural
Resource Trustee Council have been tentatively resolved.
Feasibility Study Woodard Bay Natural Resources Conservation Area
Restoration
Mr. Gouguet provided technical assistance for the feasibility study
(FS) to develop and evaluate restoration options for a historical log
dump facility in Henderson Inlet in Thurston County, Washington. The
Areas of Specialization
▪Restoration alternatives and
NEPA compliance
▪Sediment remedial
investigation planning and
remedy selection
▪Natural resource damage
assessment and restoration
▪Coastal and aquatic ecological
risk assessment
▪Net environmental benefi ts
analysis
▪Integration of response and
restoration
Education
▪BA, Biology, University of New
Orleans, 1977
Work History
▪Partner, Windward
Environmental LLC,
2008-present
▪NOAA, Offi ce of Response and
Restoration, Coastal Protection
and Restoration Division
−DARRP Senior Policy
Analyst, 2005-2008
−Chief Coastal Resource
Coordinator, 2003-2005
−Coastal Resource
Coordinator, Region 6,
1992-2003
▪Deputy Oil Spill Coordinator,
Offi ce of the Louisiana Oil Spill
Coordinator, 1991-1992
▪Municipal Water Quality
Enforcement Coordinator,
Water Pollution Control
Division, Louisiana
Department of Environmental
Quality, 1990
▪Marine Fisheries Biologist/
Project Leader, Professional
Biologist II, and Professional
Biologist I, Louisiana
Department of Wildlife and
Fisheries, 1980-1990
7.2.a
Packet Pg. 275 Attachment: Ex 1 Windward_Edmonds Marsh Proposal (Approval of Professional Services Agreement for the Edmonds Marsh Study)
Resume
Ron Gouguet (cont.)
Partner
facility is currently administered as a natural resources conservation area by the Washington State Department
of Natural Resources (WDNR). HEA was used to aggregate changes in ecosystem services for various restoration
alternatives, each of which allowed diff erent resource management goals to be achieved. Mr. Gouguet worked
with the project team (WDNR, US Army Corps of Engineers, The Nature Conservancy, Hart Crowser, and SAIC)
to defi ne parameters for the HEA model, assisted with the analysis of stressors, helped develop a conceptual model
of potential ecosystem service benefi ts from various restoration actions, and helped prepare the FS report, which
compared restoration alternatives and proposed a preferred alternative that optimized restoration value for dollars
expended. In particular, Mr. Gouguet provided advice on the expected eff ects of actions that would increase wind
and wave energy impingement on the beach. Furthermore, he provided insights on changes in ecological service
fl ows and how to summarize those changes with HEA.
NRDA for a Confi dential Client in Northeastern Washington
Mr. Gouguet is advising a client on a strategy to address NRD claims at a contaminated sediment site. At present, he
is negotiating a technical basis for a NRDA sett lement for aquatic and terrestrial resource categories related to the
facility.
NRDA for a Shipyard in Astoria, Oregon
Mr. Gouguet is advising the owner of a marine construction company on a strategy to address NRD at his shipyard,
and to integrate NRDA into the cleanup process. The Oregon State court order that will allow the remediation to
proceed, and that will contain a release of NRDA liability, is expected to be lodged late fall 2017.
Marine Facility, Portland, Oregon
Mr. Gouguet provides an industrial marine client with technical insights on techniques by which to quantify
ecosystem services, as proposed in the City of Portland plan to remediate the north reach of the Lower Willamett e
River. The client draws on Mr. Gouguet’s extensive experience with habitat evaluation, ecosystem services
accounting (e.g., REA/HEA), and restoration to evaluate the City of Portland’s proposals, and to provide meaningful
input during the public vett ing process.
NRDA for the Port of Everett , Washington
Mr. Gouguet is advising the Port of Everett on NRD claims by the trustees. Activities include “shadow”
(i.e., informal or estimated) damage assessment, including calculation and allocation of NRDA lost discounted
service acre-years (dSAYs) and their comparison with dSAY credits (restoration or mitigation bank) expected with
restoration of the Snohomish River Estuary’s Blue Heron Slough.
NRDA for a Confi dential Client in Western Oregon
Mr. Gouguet used spatial analysis, models to simulate chemical-specifi c loss of services, HEA, and analysis of
the local restoration banking market (cost per dSAY) to develop and present an independent estimate of the
Natural Resource Trustee Council’s potential NRDA claim at a site on Scapoose Bay.
NRDA for a Confi dential Client in Tacoma, Washington
Mr. Gouguet evaluated the potential liability exposure of a confi dential client to recovery claims for site
investigation and remediation costs. The cost recovery claim was based on an allocation analysis stating that the
client had been responsible for the majority of historical releases of several chemicals. However, the chemicals
were common to a large number of operational activities locally and, therefore, to a potentially large number of
sources. To bett er defi ne the likely sources of these chemicals, Mr. Gouguet used a production-specifi c chemical
that was unique to a single manufacturer and facility—a chemical fi ngerprint. Maps showing the distribution of the
fi ngerprint chemical served as a guide for understanding the likely sources of other chemicals. The analysis revealed
similar distribution patt erns for a number of other chemicals, demonstrating that the most likely signifi cant source
was the same as the source of the fi ngerprint chemical.
Lower Willamett e River Remedial Investigation and NRDA, Oregon
From 2003 through 2007, Mr. Gouguet was NOAA’s lead technical trustee for the remedial investigation and NRDA
of the Portland Harbor Superfund site. During this time, he helped the 10 co-trustees bett er communicate as a team
and found progress paths for diffi cult issues, including the importance of Pacifi c lamprey and white sturgeon to
Native American tribes. Mr. Gouguet also helped EPA Region 10 apply the national ecological risk assessment
guidance paradigm to the Portland Harbor site.
7.2.a
Packet Pg. 276 Attachment: Ex 1 Windward_Edmonds Marsh Proposal (Approval of Professional Services Agreement for the Edmonds Marsh Study)
Resume
Thai Do, MS
Field Supervisor/Environmental Scientist
Summary of Expertise
Mr. Do is an environmental scientist with more than 13 years
of experience in fi sheries biology, sediment and water quality
studies, site assessments, and data interpretation. Throughout this
experience, he has supported sediment, soil, seep, groundwater, and
surface water quality analyses, as well as sampling in terrestrial,
tidally infl uenced upland, and aquatic systems. Using a variety of
environmental assessment approaches and sampling techniques,
he has designed and managed the implementation of numerous
fi eld programs at sites both large and small, collecting data for site
characterizations, formal risk assessments, and monitoring programs.
These investigations have been conducted in compliance with
regulations and protocols at the state level (e.g., the Washington State
Model Toxics Control Act [MTCA], Puget Sound Dredge Disposal
Analysis), and at the national level (e.g., Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act [RCRA], and Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation and Liability Act [CERCLA]).
Mr. Do has particular expertise in designing and implementing fi eld
studies and in techniques for collection of sediment, soil, water, and
biological samples.
Project Experience
Tillamook County Creamery Association Wetland Monitoring
Mr. Do assisted in the implementation of a wetland monitoring plan
designed to determine the impacts of warm-water effl uent discharged
by the Tillamook County Creamery Association (TCCA) on an
adjacent wetland in Tillamook, Oregon; this plan was implemented
in order to satisfy the requirements of a National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) waste discharge permit.
Mr. Do conducted a vegetation survey to assess plant community
composition and structure, identifi ed the presence of wildlife,
assessed wildlife habitat availability and resources within
the wetland, and collected hydrology and water quality
measurements infl uencing biological and chemical processes
throughout the wetland.
Armstrong St. Helens Facility Site Characterization
Mr. Do performed a qualitative habitat survey of the lowland
habitat surrounding the Armstrong St. Helens facility in St. Helens,
Oregon. The survey was intended to refi ne an initial conceptual site
model that had been developed for the site ERA. He surveyed plant
community structure and composition by identifying and estimating
the abundance and density of dominant fl ora; verifying the presence
of small mammals, birds, and other wildlife; and identifying and
assessing areas of deposition and erosion throughout the lowlands.
He designed, coordinated, and led several additional elements of the
survey: the collection and analysis of tissue from plants and small
Areas of Specialization
▪Biological and environmental
assessment
▪Fisheries biology
▪State-wide multi-media
investigation planning and
implementation
▪Water quality and sediment
investigation
▪Data interpretation and
reporting
▪Data management and analysis
Education
▪MS, Tropical Biology, James
Cook University, 2002
▪BS, Environmental Science,
Western Washington
University, 2000
Work History
▪Field Supervisor/
Environmental Scientist,
Windward Environmental
LLC, 2003–Present
▪Marine Observer, Alaskan
Observers, Inc., 2003
▪Biological Sciences Technician,
Olympic National Park, 1996,
1998–2000, 2002
Licenses/Certifi cations
▪HAZWOPER 40-Hour
Certifi cation
▪American Red Cross First Aid
and Adult CPR
▪Transit Worker Identifi cation
Credential
▪PADI Advanced Open Water
Scuba Diver Certifi cation
7.2.a
Packet Pg. 277 Attachment: Ex 1 Windward_Edmonds Marsh Proposal (Approval of Professional Services Agreement for the Edmonds Marsh Study)
Resume
Thai Do, MS (cont.)
Field Supervisor/Environmental Scientist
mammals to determine whether certain chemicals were accumulating via the food chain; the in-water sediment
investigation to determine the nature, extent, and distribution of hazardous substances in the adjacent
Scappoose Bay; and the electrofi shing effort to collect aquatic receptor tissue and co-located sediment data to
determine whether chemicals in the sediment entered the food chain.
Lower Passaic River Superfund Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study
Mr. Do led and supported numerous tasks related to the baseline ecological risk assessment (ERA) for the
Lower Passaic River Superfund site in New Jersey. To date, these tasks have included the development of
quality assurance project plans (QAPPs) and preparation of data reports for fi eld sampling events to gather
data on surface sediment quality, water quality, fi sh and decapod tissue, the fi sh community, benthic toxicity,
the benthic community, and habitat structure. He collected fi sh tissue and community data, using boat and
backpack electrofi shing equipment, cast nets, gill nets, and set lines and fi sh traps. Mr. Do also designed and
implemented a caged bivalve study and a near-bott om dissolved oxygen monitoring program. As fi eld team
leader, he managed logistics, fi eld staff, and subconsultants during sampling events along the 17-mile study
area in all four seasons.
Portland Harbor Superfund Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study
Mr. Do participated in beach, surface sediment, subsurface sediment, and surface water sampling to defi ne the
nature and extent of contamination at the Portland Harbor Superfund site in Portland, Oregon. He played lead
roles in the design and execution of fi eld work to collect tissues for analysis of bioaccumulation in subyearling
Chinook salmon, lamprey ammocoetes, white sturgeon, and benthic invertebrates. These sampling results
were used to develop dietary exposure models, to evaluate risk to benthic invertebrates, to calibrate a food web
model, and to calculate site-specifi c biota-sediment accumulation factors. Mr. Do also led electrofi shing efforts
to collect additional ammocoetes for the purpose of conducting acute chemical toxicity range-fi nding and
exposure tests.
7.2.a
Packet Pg. 278 Attachment: Ex 1 Windward_Edmonds Marsh Proposal (Approval of Professional Services Agreement for the Edmonds Marsh Study)
Resume
Michael T. Yarnes, MS
GIS Analyst
Summary of Expertise
Mr. Yarnes is a geographic information system (GIS) analyst with
a background in geography and 12 years’ experience in providing
geographic expertise to both public and private entities with regard
to GIS-related issues. His GIS skills include spatial analysis, data
collection and management, 3-D mapping, and spatial statistics.
Mr. Yarnes has worked on projects that have involved multiple
agencies, stakeholder groups, and fi rms to form geographic networks
in order to share both GIS data and maps. He has also worked as a
fi eld support technician and is skilled in conducting environmental
sampling efforts.
Prior to joining Windward, Mr. Yarnes worked with the US Army
Corps of Engineers to capture, scan, and orthorectify aerial photos
and was involved in efforts to build wetland maps for the Bureau of
Land Management. Earlier in his career, he was responsible for the
acquisition and subsequent rectifi cation of color infrared photography
of Iowa quarter quadrangles across the entire state for the Iowa
Geological Survey Bureau in Iowa City, Iowa. As part of this effort,
Mr. Yarnes created, maintained, and interpreted spatial data within
a network database, digitized archived drainage district maps, and
catalogued Iowa River basins.
Project Experience
City of Seatt le Habitat Evaluation Procedures
Mr. Yarnes was the GIS lead for this project. He worked directly
with the Windward project team to formulate GIS habitat model
guidelines, which were used to implement strategic GIS methods to
evaluate habitat along the shoreline suitable for migrating fi sh species
in the greater Seatt le area. He used digitization, spatial analyses, and
orthorectifi cation to build inputs for the model, which was created
to assist decision makers in determining where habitat could be
improved as part of future projects. Mr. Yarnes had to meet a strict
budget and overcome GIS data limitations throughout the life of the
project. He also worked closely with City of Seatt le project staff to
provide deliverables before and after the term of the project.
Conceptual Site Model and Data Summary Report
Mr. Yarnes is the lead GIS analyst for all tasks associated with
a conceptual site model and marine data summary report for a
confi dential client in the Pacifi c Northwest. He has constructed both
fundamental and dynamic map layouts for the site and worked
closely with other consultants involved in the project to achieve an
advanced level of data coordination and sharing. Mr. Yarnes has
also worked one on one with various agencies to ensure that data
coordination remains as fl uid and transparent as possible, while
respecting confi dentiality.
Areas of Specialization
▪Spatial analysis
▪Digitizing
▪Imagery orthorectifi cation
▪Spatially weighted average
concentrations
▪Data management
▪Field sampling
Education
▪MS, Geographic Information
Science, Saint Mary’s
University, 2008
▪BS, Geography, University of
Iowa, 2003
Licenses/Certifi cations
▪HAZWOPER 40-Hour
Certifi cation
▪Certifi ed Erosion and Sediment
Control Lead
▪Confi ned space entry training
▪SIDA/AOA training
Work History
▪GIS Analyst, Windward
Environmental LLC,
2008-present
▪GIS Technician, GeoSpatial
Services, 2006-2007
▪GIS Technician, Institute for
Natural Resource Analysis and
Management, 2005
▪GIS Technician, Iowa
Geological Survey Bureau,
2001-2003
7.2.a
Packet Pg. 279 Attachment: Ex 1 Windward_Edmonds Marsh Proposal (Approval of Professional Services Agreement for the Edmonds Marsh Study)
Resume
Michael T. Yarnes, MS (cont.)
GIS Analyst
Natural Resource Damage Support
Mr. Yarnes has served as the lead GIS analyst on a project to provide natural resource damage (NRD) support
to a confi dential client. He has managed internal and external GIS data and created numerous conceptual and
general site maps, including those displaying pre- and post-restoration conditions. In addition, he contributed
to the Habitat Equivalency Analysis (HEA), using spatial analysis to help distinguish between baseline and
restored conditions.
City of Sammamish Neighborhood Drainage Plan
Mr. Yarnes served as the lead GIS analyst on a neighborhood drainage plan for the City of Sammamish,
Washington. As part of this effort, he managed internal and external GIS data and created numerous maps
depicting the stormwater alternatives and basin delineations for multiple neighborhoods. Mr. Yarnes
delineated existing stormwater infrastructure based on as-built drawings and worked with CAD layers
within GIS to form useful infrastructure maps. He also analyzed parcels, zoning descriptions, and geology to
determine areas of future development.
USCG West Coast ID/IQ Environmental Engineering Services Contract
Mr. Yarnes was the lead GIS analyst on all tasks for Windward’s indefi nite delivery/indefi nite quantity
(ID/IQ) on-call services contract with the US Coast Guard (USCG) for the West Coast and Alaska. Working
closely with Windward’s project manager, he constructed both fundamental and dynamic map layouts. Major
areas of mapping focus included groundwater contamination levels, contamination plumes, well evolution,
site maps, and chemistry maps. The maps involved numerous USCG sites and were used in a variety of
documents. Mr. Yarnes also constructed site, vicinity, topographic, and various types of chemistry maps for
remote areas of Alaska. When the need arose for computer-aided design (CAD) data to work interchangeably
with GIS data, Mr. Yarnes was involved in developing CAD and GIS fi le interoperability processes.
USCG Base Kodiak, Site 2, Navy Landfi ll ERA
Mr. Yarnes was the lead GIS analyst for an ecological risk assessment (ERA) at a USCG landfi ll at Base
Kodiak in Alaska. The project involved the investigation and sampling of surface water, sediment, soil, and
groundwater, as well as the installation of new monitoring wells. Mr. Yarnes worked to develop site location
and proposed sampling location maps, digitize areas of importance, and orthorectify imagery to be used in the
maps.
Terminal 117 Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis
Mr. Yarnes served as the lead GIS analyst for the Terminal 117 engineering evaluation/cost analysis (EE/CA) for
the Port of Seatt le. His primary duty was to construct maps and maintain the GIS database. Mapping efforts
included creating detailed maps of surface sediment sampling locations and concentrations and incorporating
revisions to older maps. He also served as a liaison with the client’s GIS personnel in the exchange of data.
Project Cost-recovery Support
Mr. Yarnes served as the lead GIS analyst on a cost-recovery effort for a confi dential client in Tacoma,
Washington. He managed GIS data and developed surface and subsurface sediment concentration maps for
two separate waterways within the study area. These maps showed natural neighbor interpolated surface
concentrations in the area. The project had tight deadlines, and Mr. Yarnes was responsible for providing a
quick turn-around in addressing client-requested map revisions.
7.2.a
Packet Pg. 280 Attachment: Ex 1 Windward_Edmonds Marsh Proposal (Approval of Professional Services Agreement for the Edmonds Marsh Study)
Resume
Jenna Rheuben
Environmental Scientist
Summary of Expertise
Ms. Rheuben is an environmental scientist with an educational
background in environmental toxicology, chemistry, and wetland
science and management. She has two years of professional
experience as a consultant working on ecological risk assessments
(ERAs), natural resource damage assessments (NRDAs), and
bioaccumulation food web modeling. Ms. Rheuben is experienced
in data analysis, as well as the presentation of data in graphical
and writt en formats in both technical documents and platform
presentations. Her experience in wetland science and management
includes fi eld wetland delineation methods; classifi cation and
rating of wetland sites per federal, state, and local regulations, and
restoration principles applied to sites in Western Washington.
Project Experience
Karileen Restoration Project
Ms. Rheuben has assisted in the preparation of annual monitoring
reports for the Karileen restoration project in Federal Way,
Washington, for the past several years. Her tasks have included
data entry and analysis to identify changes from the previous year’s
annual report. The year fi ve report was submitt ed to the natural
resource damage Trustees and US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE)
for review in July 2015. The year seven monitoring report is currently
being drafted.
Natural Resource Damage Allocation Support for Confi dential
Client
Ms. Rheuben assisted in the NRDAs conducted for a confi dential
client at two sites in Seatt le. These efforts included the assessment
of current and former property uses and activities at the parcels that
made up the client’s sites. This information was used to evaluate
service losses associated with the client’s activities, and to compare
those losses to losses associated with historical owners’ activities on
the sites. This comparison was then used to allocate the appropriate
discounted service acre years (dSAYs) for which the client was
responsible. This information was conveyed to clients and Trustees
for the purposes of NRD sett lement.
Seatt le-Tacoma International Airport Stormwater Monitoring
Ms. Rheuben serves as a fi eld technician for the Seatt le-Tacoma
International Airport construction stormwater monitoring project.
She aids in the collection and processing of stormwater samples
from locations near airport construction sites during signifi cant
precipitation events.
Areas of Specialization
▪Environmental toxicology
▪Risk assessment
▪Food web modeling
▪Wetland science
Education
▪Certifi cate in Wetland Science
and Management, University
of Washington, 2017
▪BS, Environmental Science,
Western Washington
University, 2014
Licenses/Certifi cations
▪HAZWOPER 40-Hour
Certifi cation
▪American Red Cross First Aid
and Adult CPR
Work History
▪Environmental Scientist,
Windward Environmental
LLC, 2015-present
▪Research Associate, Institute
of Environmental Toxicology,
Western Washington
University, 2014
▪Intern, Windward
Environmental LLC, 2014
7.2.a
Packet Pg. 281 Attachment: Ex 1 Windward_Edmonds Marsh Proposal (Approval of Professional Services Agreement for the Edmonds Marsh Study)
Resume
Jenna Rheuben (cont.)
Environmental Scientist
Lower Passaic River Superfund Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study
Ms. Rheuben provided support for revisions to the fi nal draft of the baseline ERA (BERA) produced as part of
the remedial investigation (RI) for the Lower Passaic River Study Area (LPRSA) in New Jersey. These revisions
required the review of a large body of scientifi c literature for a wide array of toxicants and receptors to develop
scientifi cally defensible toxicity reference values (TRVs) and evaluate ecological risk to receptors. Ms. Rheuben
also developed several species sensitivity distributions (SSDs), from which TRVs were derived when possible,
and incorporated US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and client comments into Windward’s risk
assessment methods. In both the BERA and communications with EPA, Ms. Rheuben provided discussion on
TRV applicability and uncertainty concerns for certain risk assessment applications requested by EPA.
Ms. Rheuben has also provided technical support in developing the LPRSA bioaccumulation modeling of
polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and 2, 3, 7, 8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) in select aquatic receptors.
This work has included the quality control of model code, model calibration, and documentation of the
Microsoft Excel-based version of the model. Ms. Rheuben currently provides background research that aids
in model parameterization. The model will be used to bett er understand the relationship between fate and
transport inputs and the process of PCB bioaccumulation within LPRSA biota, and to inform the effects of
remediation alternatives of predicted biota concentrations.
Edge Moor Plant and Hay Road Landfi ll: Natural Resource Damage Assessment
Ms. Rheuben assisted in natural resource damage (NRD) screening and scaling assessments conducted for
the Chemours Edge Moor Plant and Hay Road Landfi ll in Wilmington, Delaware. As part of this effort, she
was responsible for research concerning site history and baseline condition, as well as a review of relevant
toxicology literature. This information was drafted into several documents and presentations to clients and
natural resource damage Trustees for the purposes of NRD sett lement.
Lower Duwamish Waterway Administrative Order on Consent
As part of the Third Amendment of the Lower Duwamish Waterway Superfund site administrative order
on consent (AOC), Ms. Rheuben served as a fi eld technician during the collection of fi sh and benthic
invertebrates. She has also been involved in the planning for an upcoming fi eld sampling eff ort that will use
passive samplers to measure surface water PCBs.
Upper Columbia River Superfund Remedial Investigation/ Feasibility Study
Ms. Rheuben provided support for the development of TRVs for the Upper Columbia River wildlife risk
assessment conducted as part of the RI/feasibility study (FS). This task included compiling toxicity studies for
birds and mammals, and reviewing and distilling these studies based on the acceptability of study design. The
studies were then entered into a database capturing all elements of study design, including species, dosing
information, and results. The compiled information was used to develop TRVs.
SMWG Toxicity Compendia
While an intern at Windward, Ms. Rheuben conducted literature searches of a primary literature database for
recently published toxicological data on chemicals in tissue, diet, and sediment for an annual update of the
Sediment Management Work Group (SMWG) toxicity compendia.
Elk Valley Water Quality Plan Support
Ms. Rheuben provided technical support for the compilation of a synthesis report for a Teck Mining Company
project in Elk Valley, British Columbia. Her responsibilities included receiving raw environmental data and
preparing it for presentation in the report. Tasks involved calculating reference percentiles, grouping data
by sampling site, composing graphs for publication, and comparing site data with reference site data and
established water quality standards.
7.2.a
Packet Pg. 282 Attachment: Ex 1 Windward_Edmonds Marsh Proposal (Approval of Professional Services Agreement for the Edmonds Marsh Study)
Resume
Nina Maas
Environmental Scientist
Summary of Expertise
Ms. Maas is an environmental scientist with experience in risk
assessment and environmental monitoring, including water quality
sampling and site assessment. Since joining Windward, Ms. Maas
has participated in numerous projects involving ecological risk
assessments (ERAs), fi eld sampling, and the collection, management,
synthesis, and summary of large amounts of data and other
information. Ms. Maas has a diverse background that includes work
in both the public and private sectors.
Project Experience
Willamett e Slough Risk Assessment
Ms. Maas is currently working on the ERA of the Willamett e Slough
in Salem, Oregon. Her contributions include a site assessment
developed using a combination of Windward site visit observations
and historical records. Ms. Maas will also be assisting in the
completion of risk calculations and project compliance with the
requirements of the Oregon State Department of Environmental
Quality. Risk calculations will be performed using site-specifi c fi sh
tissue and sediment data for a variety of receptors, including birds,
piscivorous mammals, and fi sh.
Seatt le-Tacoma International Airport Stormwater Monitoring
Ms. Maas serves as a fi eld lead for the Seatt le-Tacoma International
Airport on-call construction stormwater monitoring project. During
precipitation-triggered monitoring events, Ms. Maas determines the
quantity of construction site discharge and measures turbidity and
pH at outfall, upstream, and downstream locations. As part of this
eff ort, Ms. Maas also assists in updating stormwater
permit-related documents, including stormwater pollution prevention
plans (SWPPPs) and standard operating procedures.
Lower Duwamish Waterway Administrative Order on Consent
Ms. Maas is assisting in numerous eff orts associated with the third
amendment of the Lower Duwamish Waterway (LDW) Superfund site
administrative order on consent (AOC). She has completed
permit determinations and applications for sampling eff orts along the
LDW; her eff orts to coordinate with governing bodies have ensured
correct permitt ing and application fees of the lowest possible cost.
Ms. Maas has conducted clam sampling in the LDW, which involved
accessing intertidal areas at low tide, identifying the locations of
clams in situ, and manually digging clams from the substrate. She has
also assisted compiling the data from all previous studies performed
in the area—including storm drain solids, sediment, groundwater,
tissue, and outfall data—to assist in determining the nature of
available data and need for future sampling eff orts to evaluate the
restoration process of the LDW.
Areas of Specialization
▪Ecological risk calculation and
assessment
▪Data analysis and management
▪Stormwater sample collection
▪Field sampling
Education
▪BS, Environmental Science,
Western Washington
University, 2013
Licenses/Certifi cations
▪HAZWOPER 40-Hour
Certifi cation
▪American Red Cross First Aid
and Adult CPR
▪Certifi ed Erosion and Sediment
Control Lead
Work History
▪Environmental Scientist,
Windward Environmental
LLC, 2016-present
▪Intern, Windward
Environmental LLC, 2016
▪Environmental Monitor, City
of Everett , 2015
7.2.a
Packet Pg. 283 Attachment: Ex 1 Windward_Edmonds Marsh Proposal (Approval of Professional Services Agreement for the Edmonds Marsh Study)
Resume
Nina Maas (cont.)
Environmental Scientist
Teck Upper Columbia River RI/FS
Ms. Maas was responsible for the review of relevant literature in regards to bird and mammal toxicity studies
being performed as part of the Upper Columbia River remedial investigation/feasibility study. If a published
study fulfi lled the requirements set by Windward (i.e., relevant endpoints, chemicals, receptors, etc.), the data
were extracted and used in the development of toxicity reference values (TRV). After data compilation was
complete, Ms. Maas ran the most relevant studies through the US Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA’s)
Toxicity Relationship Analysis Program, creating and compiling dose response curves for the selection of
TRVs.
Los Alamos National Laboratory
Ms. Maas was responsible for a literature search and review pertaining to constituents of interest in
stormwater, soil, and atmospheric deposition in urban environments. The literature search focused on
quantifying the contaminants in diff erent media from general urban development without strong point source
contamination. Following the literature search, Ms. Maas compiled all relevant data into a robust master
database for the development of upper tolerance limits. She also assembled statistics that met
project-specifi c prerequisites, which the Los Alamos National Laboratory then used to help meet its release
permit requirements. The literature review was summarized and processes were documented in an in depth
memorandum to the client.
City of Everett
While working for the City of Everett as an environmental monitor, Ms. Maas was responsible for weekly
water sampling of the drinking water reservoir and occasional stream sampling. Samples were analyzed for
water quality parameters, including zooplankton and phytoplankton. Ms. Maas was then responsible for
identifying and quantifying the zooplankton populations within the reservoir. The water quality data collected
were used to determine the general health of the reservoir, and in an att empt to predict large zooplankton and
phytoplankton blooms, which could clog fi lters and cause the drinking water facility to run at sub-optimal
volumes.
7.2.a
Packet Pg. 284 Attachment: Ex 1 Windward_Edmonds Marsh Proposal (Approval of Professional Services Agreement for the Edmonds Marsh Study)
EXHIBIT A
200 West Mercer St. Suite 401 Seattle, WA 98119
Phone: 206.378.1364 Fax: 206.973.3048 www.windwardenv.com
SCOPE OF WORK
The goal of this Scope of Work is to provide a scientific baseline study of the Edmonds
Marsh for the city council along with related tasks as described below. The following
subsections describe the approach to the scope of work for the Edmonds Marsh Study.
The approaches for Components 1 through 4 (the required components from the Marsh
Study RFP) are described in the correspondingly numbered task sections. Methods for
the accomplishment of Components 5 and 9 are also included, described under Tasks 5
and 6, respectively. In general, Windward will implement these tasks in the order in
which they are listed; however, certain steps may be done in a different order. For
example, it may be determined that implementing Task 2 (Evaluation of Site-Specific
Buffers for Ecological Functions) prior to Task 1 (Baseline Analysis), will be valuable in
helping to inform the study design for Task 1. The primary point of contact for the City
of Edmonds shall be Maureen Judge, Executive Assistant to the City Council: (425) 771-
0248; Maureen.judge@edmondswa.gov.
Task 1: Baseline Analysis
The broad ecological functions currently being performed by the Edmonds Marsh and
Shellabarger/Stella’s Marsh will be evaluated by implementing a baseline wetland
monitoring study. Water level and quality, vegetation, and invertebrate1 data will be
collected, and bird2 and other wildlife surveys3 will be performed as part of the study.
In addition, conventional sediment chemistry data (e.g., total organic carbon [TOC],
grain size, etc.) will be collected, and sediment redox profiles will be determined.
Photos will also be taken at establish photo stations during each monitoring event.
The first step in completing this task will be to develop a baseline wetland monitoring
plan that will include detailed methods about how and when data will be collected. The
monitoring plan will be developed in coordination with the City Council, City staff and
other stakeholders to ensure that it meets the requested goals and objectives of the
baseline study. It is anticipated that the baseline study will be conducted over the
course of one year, in order to gather data about conditions within the Marsh during all
1 Collected invertebrates will be identified by the field crew to the lowest taxonomic level possible (e.g.,
Order).
2 Bird surveys (e.g., point count surveys) will be conducted by Windward and by qualified
volunteers/citizen scientists. Windward will oversee and coordinate these surveys.
3 Wildlife observations made at any time during monitoring events will be recorded in the field notebook
and summarized in the monitoring reports. Wildlife cameras will also be used to assist with
observations of animals using the marsh and its buffer areas.
7.2.b
Packet Pg. 285 Attachment: Ex 3 Windward_Scope [Revision 1] (Approval of Professional Services Agreement for the Edmonds Marsh Study)
Exhibit A: Edmonds Marsh Study SOW, Deliverables, and Schedule
January 12February 6, 2018 Page 2
four seasons.4 The monitoring plan will further detail which monitoring parameters will
be collected when, and how frequently they will be collected throughout the year. It
will also identify specific monitoring locations for each of the metrics described herein,
and will expand on the monitoring methods to be followed. A major goal for the
monitoring plan will be to select and describe monitoring methods that are easy to
implement and that can be repeated easily so that comparative data can be collected in
the future.
Throughout the baseline monitoring year, the project manager and senior advisor will
apprise the City Council and attend quarterly council meetings as well as two or three
public meetings in order to provide project updates.
Task 2: Evaluation of Site-specific Buffers for Ecological Functions
This task will consist of two steps: 1) the preparation of a white paper summarizing the
available scientific literature on wetland buffer functions and recommended buffer
widths, and 2) a site-specific evaluation of the Marsh, its surrounding land uses and
land ownership, and opportunities for buffer restoration or enhancement. Windward
anticipates that while these steps will result in two separate deliverables, the site-
specific evaluation will rely heavily on the literature summarized in the white paper
when making recommendations about Marsh buffer widths and buffer restoration
opportunities.
The White Paper
The white paper will synthesize and summarize information about the functions and
recommended widths of wetland buffers; this information will be gathered from a
thorough review of scientific literature and guidance documents dealing with the topic.
Documents specific to the Pacific Northwest and western United States will be
prioritized. As much as possible, the white paper will include information about the
range of buffer widths necessary to support the following ecological functions:
1. Improving water quality (removing sediment, nutrients, and toxics)
2. Maintaining an appropriate microclimate
3. Providing a screen sufficient to prevent the disturbance of wildlife that use the
Marsh
4. Maintaining habitat connectivity and critical habitat for species that use the
Marsh as forage habitat, breeding habitat, and refuge/shelter
The white paper will also summarize the available information pertaining to buffer
widths that have been found to be insufficient to provide the four ecological functions
listed herein. Ideally, buffer width information will be summarized in a table that will
rate the quality of specific buffer width ranges as “high,” “medium,” or “low” for each
of the four ecological functions.
4 A tide gate currently alters natural tidal flow from November through March.
7.2.b
Packet Pg. 286 Attachment: Ex 3 Windward_Scope [Revision 1] (Approval of Professional Services Agreement for the Edmonds Marsh Study)
Exhibit A: Edmonds Marsh Study SOW, Deliverables, and Schedule
January 12February 6, 2018 Page 3
Site-specific Evaluation
The site-specific evaluation of the Marsh will also evaluate the extent of the current
Marsh buffers, as well as land uses and ownership immediately adjacent to the Marsh,
extending at least 125 ft from the Marsh perimeter in all directions (125 ft is the
combined distance of the 110-ft buffer and 15-ft setback proposed byunder the City’s
current SMP regulations for the Marsh). A map will be developed to clearly outline
existing Marsh buffers and illustrate adjacent land uses and ownership; this map will be
based on the map attached to this RFP. Any stormwater outfalls or areas where
stormwater is known to flow overland into the Marsh will also be mapped. The ability
of existing Marsh buffers to provide the four ecological functions listed will be
evaluated by combining findings from the white paper with information about existing
buffer widths and conditions. The site-specific evaluation will identify opportunities for
buffer extension and restoration, and will make specific recommendations for such
activities. The evaluation will also consider what impacts the Marsh could experience if
existing buffers were to be affected by new development or other land use changes, or if
proposed mitigation for a development project were to include relatively narrow
buffers.5
Task 3: 2019 SMP Update Information
The information gathered during Tasks 1 and 2—such as the current conditions of the
Marsh and its existing buffers, as well as recommendations for restoration opportunities
within buffer areas—will be available to help inform the 2019 Shoreline Master Program
(SMP) update. Therefore, Task 3 will require a relatively low level of effort, which will
include summarizing pertinent information from Tasks 1 and 2 in a format that will be
easily incorporated into the 2019 SMP update. Windward will work with the City
Council and City staff to ensure that the information summarized as part of this task is
appropriate for incorporation into the 2019 SMP update.
Task 4: Willow Creek Daylighting Impacts
The Willow Creek daylighting project is expected to increase the Marsh’s inundation
area by approximately 2.5 ac, shift habitat areas that are currently freshwater and
dominated by cattail to salt marsh habitat, and improve fish access to both the creek
and the Marsh. Windward’s analysis will be based on The the City’s current design for
the new daylighted channel through the Marsh, (based on the preferred alignment
alternative Option C described in the FS [Shannon & Wilson 2015]) which will continue
beyond the Marsh to run midway through Marina Beach Park and discharge into Puget
Sound to the south of the Edmonds Marina.
5 For the purposes of this approach, “relatively narrow buffers” are considered to be those less than 110 ft
with a 15-ft setback, as outlined in Option M of the FS (Shannon & Wilson 2015).
7.2.b
Packet Pg. 287 Attachment: Ex 3 Windward_Scope [Revision 1] (Approval of Professional Services Agreement for the Edmonds Marsh Study)
Exhibit A: Edmonds Marsh Study SOW, Deliverables, and Schedule
January 12February 6, 2018 Page 4
Windward’s analysis will include recommendations for monitoring that could be
conducted after the dayilighting project is complete, as well as recommendations for
native buffer plantings that could be installed along the daylighted creek banks.
Windward will analyze how the Willow Creek daylighting project will likely affect
ecological functions and conditions within the Marsh. We envision employing
modeling tools such as Resource Equivalency Analysis (REA) or Habitat Equivalency
Analysis (HEA), coupled with GIS, to quantitatively estimate the ecosystem service
units that will be gained. REA typically uses a resource metric that has had a population
or quantity change (e.g., number of juvenile coho salmon, biomass of benthic
organisms). The models are used to examine the compare the quantity of habitat
services under current conditions to those expected to result from a future restored
condition (in this case, the Willow Creek daylighting project). HEA is a version of REA
that uses a habitat metric, such as acres of land, and analyzes a change in services
provided by that habitat.
Information gathered during Tasks 1 and 2 will be used to construct a GIS-based
REA/HEA model and reflect baseline Marsh services, including support of plant or
animal populations. Using the ecosystem changes that are anticipated to occur in the
Marsh in response to the daylighting of Willow Creek, the model will be used to reflect
the increased value of various metrics (i.e., productivity, biomass, etc.). The model will
also allow ecosystem service credits to be calculated once the City implements the
Willow Creek daylighting project. The quantity of ecosystem services generated by the
project will be derived by comparing the resource functions of the baseline Marsh
condition with the estimated future functions of the Marsh based on the literature and
best professional judgement.
Task 5: Vegetation Enhancement Project Impacts (Optional Component 5)
Using information gathered during Task 2, Windward will work to identify specific
areas around the Marsh where denser, more diverse, or otherwise better-quality
buffers—which can be installed through volunteer vegetation enhancement projects—
can serve to improve ecological functions within the marsh, or possibly reduce or
otherwise alter the buffer widths necessary to protect and maintain those functions. The
scope for this task will be developed further in the future in coordination with the City,
after Tasks 1-4 are underway.
Task 6: Preparation for a Long-term Watershed Management Study (Optional Component
9)
In order to help determine an initial scope and process for developing a long-term
watershed management study and strategy, Windward will work closely with the City
Council and City staff to ensure that we understand the broad range of issues related to
the Marsh and its watershed, and to identify the best options for engaging the public in
a management planning process. Information regarding the Marsh, Willow Creek, and
Shellabarger Creek provided in the City’s Shoreline Master Program Restoration Plan
7.2.b
Packet Pg. 288 Attachment: Ex 3 Windward_Scope [Revision 1] (Approval of Professional Services Agreement for the Edmonds Marsh Study)
Exhibit A: Edmonds Marsh Study SOW, Deliverables, and Schedule
January 12February 6, 2018 Page 5
(City of Edmonds 2015), Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan (City of Edmonds
2016a), City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan (City of Edmonds 2016b), and Storm and
Surface Water Comprehensive Management Plan (Herrera and City of Edmonds 2010)
will also be reviewed to help establish the steps and scope of the study plan, and to
further develop a list of stakeholders. The scope for this task will be developed further
in the future in coordination with the City, after Tasks 1-4 are underway.
DELIVERABLES
The deliverables for each task are described below.
Task 1
A baseline wetland monitoring plan will be developed to guide field data collection
efforts. The results of the baseline wetland monitoring study will be presented in a data
report. The report will include a qualitative evaluation of the ecological functions being
provided by the Marsh in its baseline condition, based on the data collected. For
example, for each metric monitored, the ecological functions of the Marsh can be rated
as “high,” “medium,” or “low” by comparing the baseline data for the Marsh to data
from one or more reference marshes or data in the scientific literature.
Task 2
The deliverables for this task will include the white paper summarizing available
scientific information about wetland buffer functions, and a technical report with
detailed maps presenting the results of the site-specific evaluation.
Task 3
The deliverables for this task will be text sections that can be directly incorporated into
the 2019 SMP update, as well as an updated GIS map of the Marsh and its surroundings
(if the City desires such a map to be included in the update).
Task 4
A technical memorandum will be prepared to describe the process used to develop the
REA/HEA model and the results of the modeling effort.
Task 5
The deliverable for this task will likely be a short report or technical memorandum
summarizing recommendations for vegetation enhancement projects around the Marsh
and the anticipated impacts of those projects. The appropriate deliverable will be
determined in consultation with the City as the scope for this task is further developed.
Task 6
The deliverable for this task will likely be a memorandum summarizing the goals and
plans for the Marsh, Willow Creek, and Shellabarger Creek specified in existing City
documents; an overview of stakeholders involved to-date in plans for the Marsh and its
7.2.b
Packet Pg. 289 Attachment: Ex 3 Windward_Scope [Revision 1] (Approval of Professional Services Agreement for the Edmonds Marsh Study)
Exhibit A: Edmonds Marsh Study SOW, Deliverables, and Schedule
January 12February 6, 2018 Page 6
tributaries; ideas for public outreach activities (e.g., online surveys, community
meetings) that could help further develop a strategy for the Marsh and its watershed;
and an outline of the scope and process that could be used to develop a long-term
watershed management study. The appropriate deliverable will be determined in
consultation with the City as the scope for this task is further developed.
SCHEDULE
All tasks associated with this project will be substantially completed by the end
of July 2019, as outlined in the project schedule table below, provided
that any specific tasks may be extended an additional two months as
necessary to effectively address the relevant issues.
7.2.b
Packet Pg. 290 Attachment: Ex 3 Windward_Scope [Revision 1] (Approval of Professional Services Agreement for the Edmonds Marsh Study)
Exhibit A: Edmonds Marsh Study SOW, Deliverables, and Schedule
January 12February 6, 2018 Page 7
Table 2. Project schedule
Project Task/Milestone Estimated Initiation
Date
Kick-off Meeting with City January 1, 2018
Contract Approval by City by January 31, 2018
Task 1: Baseline Analysis – develop monitoring study
work plan
Prepare draft work plan March, 2018
City review of work plan April 19, 2018
Revise work plan per City comments May 2, 2018
Task 1: Baseline Analysis - field effort one field event per quarter for a year May 2018
Task 1: Baseline Analysis – data report
Prepare draft data report May 1, 2018
City review of data report June1, 2018
Revise data report per City comments June 16, 2018
Task 2: Evaluation of Wetland Buffers
Prepare draft deliverables March 1, 2018
City review of deliverables April 5, 2018
Revise deliverables per City comments April 19, 2018
Task 3: 2019 SMP Update Information
Meet with City and prepare draft deliverables (text and map) August 16, 2018
City review of draft deliverables September 6, 2018
Revise deliverables per City comments September 20, 2018
Task 4: Analyze Impacts from Daylighting Willow Creek
using REA/HEA model
Develop model and draft tech memo February 2, 2019
City review of draft tech memo March 4, 2019
Revise tech memo per City comments March 19, 2019
Task 5: Vegetation Enhancement Project Impacts Draft tech memo June 1, 2018
City review of draft tech memo June 21, 2018
Revise tech memo per City comments July 4, 2018
Task 6: Preparation for a Long-term Watershed
Management Study
Meet with City and draft tech memo April 4, 2019
City review of draft tech memo May, 2019
Revise tech memo per City comments May15, 2019
Project completion
7.2.b
Packet Pg. 291 Attachment: Ex 3 Windward_Scope [Revision 1] (Approval of Professional Services Agreement for the Edmonds Marsh Study)
EXHIBIT A
200 West Mercer St. Suite 401 Seattle, WA 98119
Phone: 206.378.1364 Fax: 206.973.3048 www.windwardenv.com
Table 2. Project schedule
Project Task/Milestone Estimated Initiation
Date
Estimated
Completion Date
Kick-off Meeting with City January 1, 2018 February 27, 2018
Contract Approval by City by February 7, 2018
Task 1: Baseline Analysis – develop monitoring study
work plan
Prepare draft work plan March 19, 2018 April 16, 2018
City review of work plan April 17, 2018 May 1, 2018
Revise work plan per City comments May 2, 2018 May 9, 2018
Task 1: Baseline Analysis - field effort one field event per quarter for a year May 2018 April 2019
Task 1: Baseline Analysis – data report
Prepare draft data report May 1, 2019 May 31, 2019
City review of data report June 3, 2019 June 14, 2019
Revise data report per City comments June 17, 2019 June 24, 2019
Task 2: Evaluation of Wetland Buffers
Prepare draft deliverables March 1, 2018 April 2, 2018
City review of deliverables April 3, 2018 April 16, 2018
Revise deliverables per City comments April 17, 2018 April 24, 2018
Task 3: 2019 SMP Update Information
Meet with City and prepare draft deliverables (text and map) August 16, 2018 September 7, 2018
City review of draft deliverables September 10, 2018 September 21, 2018
Revise deliverables per City comments September 24, 2018 September 28, 2018
Task 4: Analyze Impacts from Daylighting Willow Creek
using REA/HEA model
Develop model and draft tech memo February 1, 2019 March 1, 2019
City review of draft tech memo March 4, 2019 March 15, 2019
Revise tech memo per City comments March 18, 2019 March 25, 2019
Task 5: Vegetation Enhancement Project Impacts Draft tech memo June 1, 2018 June 22, 2018
City review of draft tech memo June 25, 2018 July 10, 2018
Revise tech memo per City comments July 11, 2018 July 18, 2018
Task 6: Preparation for a Long-term Watershed
Management Study
Meet with City and draft tech memo April 1, 2019 April 29, 2019
City review of draft tech memo May 1, 2019 May 15, 2019
Revise tech memo per City comments May16, 2019 May 30, 2019
7.2.c
Packet Pg. 292 Attachment: Ex 4 Project Schedule (Approval of Professional Services Agreement for the Edmonds
Exhibit A: Edmonds Marsh Study SOW, Deliverables, and Schedule
January 12, 2018 Page 8
Project Task/Milestone Estimated Initiation
Date
Estimated
Completion Date
Project completion July 31, 2019
7.2.c
Packet Pg. 293 Attachment: Ex 4 Project Schedule (Approval of Professional Services Agreement for the Edmonds
Staff Role Rate Hours Cost Hours Cost Hours Cost Hours Cost Hours Cost
Senior Advisor 195.00 16 3,120$ 16 3,120$ 16 3,120$ 14 2,730$ 62 12,090$
Project Manager 155.00 40 6,200$ 40 6,200$ 40 6,200$ 20 3,100$ 140 21,700$
Field Lead 110.00/140.00 40 5,600$ 120 13,200$ 24 3,360$ 184 22,160$
GIS Analyst 130.00 20 2,600$ 20 2,600$ 28 3,640$ 68 8,840$
Project Scientist 95.00/120.00 60 7,200$ 116 11,020$ 80 9,600$ 256 27,820$
Editorial Staff 125.00 20 2,500$ -$ 20 2,500$ 40 5,000$
Admininstrative Support 115.00 4 460$ 8 920$ 4 460$ 16 1,840$
Total Labor 200 27,680$ 320 37,060$ 212 28,880$ 34 5,830$ 766 99,450$
Other Direct Costs
Field gear
Water quality/level data loggers (7) $ 1,995 7 13,965$ 13,965$
Barometric pressure loggers (for WQ/water
level data loggers) (3) $ 450 3 1,350$ 1,350$
YSI Professional Plus Multiparameter®
water quality meter rental (unit/week) $ 330 4 1,320$ 1,320$
Sediment pH/ORP monitor (lump sum) $ 350 1 350$ 350$
Soil/sediment TOC and grain size analysis
(per sample) $ 175 12 2,100$ 2,100$
High-precision GPS rental (unit/week) $ 300 1 300$ 300$
Staff gage materials (lump sum) $ 300 1 300$ 300$
Wildlife cameras (3) $ 75 3 225$ 225$
Travel
Mileage $ 0.530 111.3 59$ 59$
Total ODCs 19,969$ 19,969$
Total Costs 27,680$ 57,029$ 28,880$ 119,419$ 93929
Notes and Assumptions:
Project scientists will be charged at a rate of $95/hr for field work.
The Field Lead will be charged at a rate of $110/hr for field work.
Water level data loggers will be deployed continuously for the entire monitoring year.
It will take 2 field staff 3 days (working 10 hour days) to collect monitoring data during the second (summer) event.
It will take 2 field staff 2 days (working 10 hour days) to collect monitoring data during the third (fall) event.
It will take 2 field staff 1 day (working an 8-hour day) to collect monitoring data during the fourth (winter) event.
Each deliverable will undergo one round of client review and subsequent revisions.
Citizen scientists (volunteers from the community) will help collect bird data (e.g., point count surveys), make additional wildlife observations, and possibly help
with additional photos and measurements at the water level gage stations. Windward will help coordinate and oversee these efforts.
Vegetation surveys will be conducted in spring and summer and will consist of 6 transects through the riparian/buffer zones up to the marsh edge, with 4
monitoring plots per transect. Vegetation within the marsh will be mapped using high-resolution aerial photos and ground truthing at strategic locations in the field.
A high-precision GPS unit will be needed for one week at the beginning of the field effort to establish sampling locations to be visited throughout the monitoring
year; the high-precision GPS will be able to produce sufficiently accurate locations coordinates and elevation information.
A regular hand-held GPS unit will be sufficient for re-occupying sampling locations once they have been established.
Seven water quality/level data loggers will be purchased to monitor water levels in the Marsh for extended periods of time throughout the monitoring year (it is
likely that 5 will deployed and 2 will serve as spares). Three barometric pressure and temperature loggers, used to help establish the water quality loggers, will
also be purchased. If the City of Edmonds purchases the loggers instead of Windward, these expenses will be subtracted from Windward's budget.
The baseline monitoring work plan will be written so that it can also be used for future monitoring events. The study will include Edmonds Marsh and
Shellabarger/Stella's Marsh.
It will take 2 field staff 5 days (working 10 hour days) to establish baseline monitoring locations, deploy data loggers, and to collect monitoring data during the first
(spring) event.
Field work budget also includes one hour/month per water quality/level data logger for maintenance and calibration (for months when no other data collection is
taking place).
Windward will be responsible for collecting water level and water quality measurements, redox observations, and vegetation data. Windward will also note any
incidental wildlife observations made while in the field, will deploy and maintain the wildlife cameras, and will take photos from the photo stations during each
monitoring event.
Task 1 : Baseline Environmental Study -
Design and Implementation
Subtask 1 Subtask 2 Subtask 3
Total
Work Plan Development Field Work (4 events)Data Report
Subtask 4
Attend City Council and
Public Meetings
7.2.d
Packet Pg. 294 Attachment: Ex 5 Edmonds Marsh Updated Budget 1_3_18 (Approval of Professional Services Agreement for the Edmonds Marsh Study)
CITY OF EDMONDS
121 5th Avenue North, Edmonds WA 98020
Phone: 425.771.0220 • Fax: 425.771.0221 • Web: www.edmondswa.gov
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT • PLANNING DIVISION
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) is made and entered into between the City
of Edmonds, hereinafter referred to as the “City”, and Windward Environmental, LLC,
hereinafter referred to as the “Consultant”.
WHEREAS, the City desires to engage the professional services and assistance of the Consultant
for services to the Edmonds City Council and the public related to performing a site-specific, planning-
level scientific study of the Edmonds Marsh that will:
1) assess and report the current state of the ecological functions of the Edmonds Marsh, including
but not limited to its: (a) biogeochemical functions, (b) hydrologic functions; and (c) food web and
wildlife habitat functions;
2) identify and report what properly functioning ecological conditions are for the Edmonds Marsh;
3) evaluate and report the range of buffer widths that will ensure effective site-specific buffer
functions for: (a) removing sediment; (b) removing excess nutrients, (c) removing toxics, (d) influencing
the microclimate, (e) screening adjacent disturbances to wildlife (including noise and light), (f)
maintaining habitat connectivity, and (g) maintaining habitat critical for the life needs of wildlife that
utilize the Edmonds Marsh including refuge/shelter, feeding, breeding, and distancing wildlife sensitive to
human activities;
4) analyze and report how the daylighting of Willow Creek may alter the Marsh’s environmental
conditions and how that may affect the location and ranges of buffer widths that are necessary for the
protection and maintenance of ecological functions;
5) analyze and report what vegetation enhancements are needed at the Edmonds Marsh and how
they may affect the location and ranges of buffer widths necessary for the protection and maintenance of
ecological functions;
6) analyze and report how the excavation of channels to extend tidal flow and increase capacity
and circulation within the Marsh (including the portion known as Shellabarger Marsh on the east side of
Highway 104) may affect environmental conditions and the location and ranges of buffer widths that are
necessary for the protection and maintenance of ecological functions;
7) utilize data from ongoing studies and collaborate with local citizens conducting studies and/or
observations at the Edmonds Marsh to determine baseline ecological conditions;
8) provide information on updating the City’s Shoreline Management Program in 2019;
7.2.e
Packet Pg. 295 Attachment: Ex 2 Updated Windward Professional Services Agreement [Revision 1] (Approval of Professional Services Agreement for the
9) identify a scope and process, with options and recommendations, for developing a watershed
management study and strategy for the Edmonds Marsh; and
WHEREAS, Windward Environmental, LLC, is qualified and available to provide
those services under this Agreement;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of mutual benefits accruing, it is agreed
by and between the parties hereto as follows:
1. Scope of work. The Scope of Work shall include all services and material
necessary to accomplish the above-mentioned objectives in accordance with the Scope of
Services that is marked as Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this
reference.
2. Payments. The Consultant shall be paid by the City for completed work
for services rendered under this Agreement as provided hereinafter. Such payment shall
be full compensation for work performed or services rendered and for all labor,
materials, supplies, equipment and incidentals necessary to complete the work.
A. Payment for work accomplished under the terms of this Agreement
shall be based on a time and expense basis as set forth on the fee schedule found in Exhibit
B, attached hereto and incorporated by this reference; provided in no event shall the payment
for work performed pursuant to this Agreement exceed the sum of
$119,419.
B. All vouchers shall be submitted by the Consultant to the City for
payment pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. The City shall pay the appropriate amount
for each voucher to the Consultant. The Consultant may submit vouchers to the City monthly
for services performed and accepted by the City. Billing shall be reviewed in conjunction
with the City’s warrant process. No billing shall be considered for payment that has not
been submitted to the City three days prior to the scheduled cut-off date. Such late vouchers
will be checked by the City and payment will be made in the next regular payment cycle.
7.2.e
Packet Pg. 296 Attachment: Ex 2 Updated Windward Professional Services Agreement [Revision 1] (Approval of Professional Services Agreement for the
C. The costs, records and accounts pertaining to this Agreement are to
be kept available for inspection by representatives of the City for a period of three (3) years
after final payment. Copies shall be made available upon request.
3. Ownership and use of documents. All research, tests, surveys,
preliminary data and any and all other work product prepared or gathered by the Consultant
in preparation for the services rendered by the Consultant under this Agreement shall be
and are the property of Consultant, provided that:
A. All f i n a l reports, presentations and testimony prepared by the
Consultant shall become the property of the City upon their presentation to and acceptance
by the City and shall at that date become the property of the City.
B. The City shall have the right, upon reasonable request, to inspect,
review and subject to the approval of the Consultant, copy any work product.
C. In the event that the Consultant shall default on this Agreement, or
in the event that this Agreement shall be terminated prior to its completion as herein
provided, the work product of the Consultant, along with a summary of work done to date
of default or termination, shall become the property of the City and tender of the work product
and summary shall be a prerequisite to final payment under this Agreement. The summary
of work done shall be prepared at no additional cost.
4. Time of performance. The Consultant shall perform the work authorized
by this Agreement promptly in accordance with the receipt of the required government
approvals.
5. Hold Harmless agreement. The Consultant shall indemnify and hold the City
and its officers and employees harmless from and shall process and defend at its own expense
all claims, demands, or suits at law or equity arising in whole or in part from the Consultant’s
negligence or breach of any of its obligations under this Agreement; provided that nothing
herein shall require a Consultant to indemnify the City against and hold harmless the City from
claims, demands or suits based solely upon the conduct of the City, its agents, officers and
employees; and provided further that if the claims or suits are caused by or result from the
concurrent negligence of (a) the Consultant’s agents or employees, and (b) the City, its agents,
officers and employees, this indemnity provision with respect to (1) claims or suits based upon
such negligence (2) the costs to the City of defending such claims and suits shall be valid and
enforceable only to the extent of the Consultant’s negligence or the negligence of the
Consultant’s agents or employees.
6. General and professional liability insurance. The Consultant shall obtain
and keep in force during the terms of the Agreement, or as otherwise required, the following
insurance with companies or through sources approved by the State Insurance Commissioner
pursuant to Title 48 RCW.
Insurance Coverage
A. Worker’s compensation and employer’s liability insurance as
required by the State.
7.2.e
Packet Pg. 297 Attachment: Ex 2 Updated Windward Professional Services Agreement [Revision 1] (Approval of Professional Services Agreement for the
B. Commercial general liability and property damage insurance in an
aggregate amount not less than two million dollars ($2,000,000) for bodily injury, including
death and property damage. The per occurrence amount shall be written with limits no less
than one million dollars ($1,000,000).
C. Vehicle liability insurance for any automobile used in an amount not
less than a one million dollar ($1,000,000) combined single limit.
($1,000,000).
D. Professional liability insurance in the amount of one million dollars
Excepting the Worker’s Compensation Insurance and Professional Liability Insurance
secured by the Consultant, the City will be named on all policies as an additional insured.
The Consultant shall furnish the City with verification of insurance and endorsements required
by the Agreement. The City reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all
required insurance policies at any time.
All insurance shall be obtained from an insurance company authorized to do business in the
State of Washington. The Consultant shall submit a verification of insurance as outlined
above within fourteen days of the execution of this Agreement to the City.
No cancellation of the foregoing policies shall be effective without thirty days prior notice to
the City.
The Consultant’s professional liability to the City shall be limited to the amount payable
under this Agreement or one million dollars ($1,000,000), whichever is the greater, unless
modified elsewhere in this Agreement. In no case shall the Consultant’s professional liability
to third parties be limited in any way.
7. Discrimination prohibited. Consultant shall not discriminate against any
employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, national origin, age,
sex, sexual orientation, marital status, veteran status, liability for service in the armed forces
of the United States, disability, or the presence of any sensory, mental or physical handicap,
or any other protected class status, unless based upon a bona fide occupational qualification.
8. Consultant is an independent contractor. The parties intend that an
independent contractor relationship will be created by this Agreement. No agent, employee
or representative of the Consultant shall be deemed to be an agent, employee or
representative of the City for any purpose. Consultant shall be solely responsible for all acts
of its agents, employees, representatives and subcontractors during the performance of this
Agreement.
9. City approval of work. Notwithstanding the Consultant’s status as an
independent contractor, results of the work performed pursuant to this Agreement must
meet the approval of the City.
10. Termination. This Agreement may be terminated without cause by the
City at any time during the term of the Agreement by ten (10) day written notice from
the City to the Consultant. If City so terminates this Agreement, Consultant shall
7.2.e
Packet Pg. 298 Attachment: Ex 2 Updated Windward Professional Services Agreement [Revision 1] (Approval of Professional Services Agreement for the
immediately stop all work herein and shall immediately cause its suppliers or
7.2.e
Packet Pg. 299 Attachment: Ex 2 Updated Windward Professional Services Agreement [Revision 1] (Approval of Professional Services Agreement for the
subcontractors to cease work. Unless the termination is for cause, the City shall determine
and pay to Consultant the percentage of the Agreement price equal to the percentage of
conforming services performed and goods delivered or partially manufactured prior to the
delivery of City’s termination notice, plus reasonable actual direct out-of-pocket expenses
incurred by Consultant as a result of the termination (excluding any lost profits).
11. Integration. The Agreement between the parties shall consist of this
document, the Consultant’s proposal attached hereto as Exhibit A, and Consultant’s fee
schedule attached hereto as Exhibit B. These writings constitute the entire Agreement of the
parties and shall not be amended except by a writing executed by both parties. In the event of
any conflict between this written Agreement and provision of Exhibits A or B, this Agreement
shall control.
12. Changes/Additional work. The City may engage Consultant to perform
services in addition to those listed in this Agreement, and Consultant will be entitled to
additional compensation for authorized additional services or materials. The City shall not
be liable for additional compensation until and unless any and all additional work and
compensation is approved in advance in writing and signed by both parties to this
Agreement. If conditions are encountered which are not anticipated in the Scope of Work,
the City understands that a revision to the Scope of Work and fees may be required.
Provided, however, that nothing in this paragraph shall be interpreted to obligate the
Consultant to render services, or the City to pay for services rendered, in excess of the
Scope of Work in Exhibit A, unless or until an amendment to this Agreement is approved in
writing by both parties.
13. Standard of care. Consultant represents that Consultant has the necessary
knowledge, skill and experience to perform services required by this Agreement. Consultant
and any persons employed by Consultant shall use their best efforts to perform the work
in a professional manner consistent with sound practices, in accordance with the usual and
customary professional care required for services of the type described in the Scope of Work.
14. Non-waiver. Waiver by the City of any provision of this Agreement or any
time limitation provided for in this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other
provision.
15. Non-assignable. The services to be provided by the Consultant shall not
be assigned or subcontracted without the express written consent of the City.
16. Covenant against contingent fees. The Consultant warrants that it has
not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working
solely for the Consultant, to solicit or secure this contract, and that it has not paid or
agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely
for the Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gifts or any other
consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award of making this Agreement. For
breach or violation of this warranty, the City shall have the right to annul this A g r e e m
e n t without liability or, in its discretion to deduct from the contract price or consideration,
or otherwise recover, the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift,
or contingent fee.
7.2.e
Packet Pg. 300 Attachment: Ex 2 Updated Windward Professional Services Agreement [Revision 1] (Approval of Professional Services Agreement for the
17. Compliance with laws. The Consultant in the performance of this
Agreement shall comply with all applicable Federal, State or local laws and ordinances,
including regulations for licensing, certification and operation of facilities, programs and
accreditation, and licensing of individuals, and any other standards or criteria as described
in the Agreement to assure quality of services.
18. Notices. Notices shall be sent to the following address, with receipt of any
notice being deemed effective three days after deposit of written notice.
City of Edmonds Consultant
City of Edmonds Windward Environmental, LLC
121 Fifth Avenue North 200 West Mercer St., Suite 401
Edmonds, WA 98020 Seattle, WA 98119
425-771-0220 206-378-1364
DATED THIS DAY OF , 2018.
CITY OF EDMONDS WINDWARD ENVIRONMENTAL LLC
David O. Earling, Mayor By: _
Its:
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED:
Scott Passey, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Office of the City Attorney
7.2.e
Packet Pg. 301 Attachment: Ex 2 Updated Windward Professional Services Agreement [Revision 1] (Approval of Professional Services Agreement for the
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
)ss
COUNTY OF )
On this day of , 2018, before me, the undersigned, a
Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn,
personally appeared , to me known to be the
of the corporation that executed the
foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary
act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath
stated that he/she was authorized to execute said instrument and that the seal affixed is the
corporate seal of said corporation.
WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year first above
written.
NOTARY PUBLIC
My commission expires:
7.2.e
Packet Pg. 302 Attachment: Ex 2 Updated Windward Professional Services Agreement [Revision 1] (Approval of Professional Services Agreement for the
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 02/20/2018
ECC Amendment to Allow Boards/Commissions Remote Participation
Staff Lead: Patrick Doherty
Department: Community Services
Preparer: Patrick Doherty
Background/History
Chapter 1.05 of the Edmonds City Code provides the basic requirements for attendance and quorums
for City boards and commissions. Additional specific provisions regarding quorums and other details are
provided for in the respective sections for each board and commission found in Title 10 ECC.
Staff Recommendation
Approve proposed Ordinance.
Narrative
The Citizens Economic Development Commission voted at its November 15, 2017 to propose
amendments to applicable city regulations to accommodate remote (telephone, video conference or
other remote communications device) participation by members up to three times per calendar year
and to allow such telephonic participation to be counted both towards a meeting quorum and vote
counts in transacting business. This matter was brought to the City Council’s Public Safety and
Personnel Committee on January 23, 2018, at which time Committee members expressed their desire to
allow for remote participation by members of all city boards and commissions, requesting that the
proposal be revised to encompass all boards and commissions. Upon presentation to the revised
proposal to the Public Safety and Personnel Committee on February 13, 2018, Committee members
offered two amendments: 1) that only two incidents of remote participation be allowed per year; and 2)
members participating remotely must attend the entire meeting to join in actions, votes, etc.
The attached, revised ordinance provides the necessary amendments to ECC Chapter 1.05 to allow for
such remote participation at boards and commission meetings, as well as allowance for such remote
participants to be counted towards the necessary quorum of each respective board or commission,
including the amendments recommended by the Council Committee members.
Attachments:
Ordinance for Remote Participation Boards Commissions-V2
7.3
Packet Pg. 303
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING
CHAPTER 1.05 OF THE EDMONDS CITY CODE TO ALLOW FOR REMOTE
PARTICIPATION BY MEMBERS CITY BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS.
WHEREAS, Chapter 1.05 of the Edmonds City Code provides the basic requirements for
attendance and quorums for City boards and commissions, and
WHEREAS, additional specific provisions regarding quorums and other details are provided for in
the respective sections for each board and commission found in Title 10 ECC, and
WHEREAS, the Citizens Economic Development Commission voted at its November 15, 2017 to
propose amendments to applicable city regulations to accommodate remote (telephone,
videoconference or other remote communications device) participation by members up to three times
per calendar year and to allow such telephonic participation to be counted both towards a meeting
quorum and vote counts in transacting business, and
WHEREAS, this matter was brought to the City Council’s Public Safety and Personnel Committee
on January 23, 2018, at which time Committee members expressed their desire to allow for remote
participation by members of all city boards and commissions, requesting that the proposal be revised to
encompass all boards and commissions, and
WHEREAS, the Mayor and City Council find it to be in the public interest to enable all city board
and commission members to take advantage of technology to participate in board and commission
meetings in order to facilitate an informed and timely discussion and consideration of their respective
issues of importance to the City;
NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Section 1.05.010 of the Edmonds City Code, entitled “Attendance required,” is hereby
amended to read as follows (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown in strike-through):
1.05.010 Attendance required – Remote Participation.
A. In addition to being subject to removal for other particularized grounds as set forth in applicable
provisions of the Edmonds City Code, members of all city boards, commissions and committees
(hereinafter “members”) except as set forth herein, shall be removed from office, and the position
7.3.a
Packet Pg. 304 Attachment: Ordinance for Remote Participation Boards Commissions-V2 (ECC Amendment to Allow Boards/Commissions Remote
deemed vacant as set forth in ECC 1.05.020(C) if such member attends less than 70 percent of the
regular meetings in any one calendar year, and/or is not in attendance at three or more consecutive
regular meetings. Members may participate in board and commission meetings remotely (by telephone,
videoconference, etc.) up to two times per calendar year, and such participation shall be considered
attendance for the purposes of this subsection, PROVIDED THAT any such participation must allow for all
other members of the board or commission and any public in attendance to hear the member on the
remote device, and PROVIDED FURTHER THAT any member participating remotely must commence
participation at the beginning of the meeting and must declare an intention to participate until the end
of the meeting. After resuming a remote connection after any technical disruption of said connection,
the Chair shall determine whether a member may participate in any action on a matter that may have
been discussed during the disconnection, based on the duration of the disconnection, nature of the
discussion, etc.
B. The chairperson of the particular board, commission or committee may excuse any member from
attendance at any particular meeting or meetings for reasons that are (1) work related, (2) due to illness
or death in the family, or (3) extended vacations in excess of two weeks in length; provided, however,
each such excused absence shall be so noted by the chairperson at the meeting from which the member
is being excused and such fact shall be recorded in the minutes along with the reason given for the
excused absence by the member. Excused absences shall not be counted for purposes of removal from
office, but only if so noted in the minutes as set forth herein. In the absence of the chairperson, the
member acting in the chairperson’s behalf, such as vice-chairperson or pro tem, shall make the
determination of whether the absence is excused, and announce the same for recording in the minutes
of the meeting from which the member is excused. [Ord. 2556, 1986; Ord. 2033 § 2, 1978; Ord. 2156 §
1, 1980].
Section 2. Section 1.05.050 of the Edmonds City Code, entitled “Quorum requirements,” is
hereby amended to read as follows (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown in strike-
through):
1.05.050 Quorum requirements.
A. Notwithstanding any other provision of the Edmonds City Code, if the number of members of any city
board, commission or committee having seven positions and subject to this chapter, should be reduced
to six or less for any reason, including a member’s removal for failure to maintain attendance, three
members shall constitute a quorum. [Ord. 2033 § 6, 1978].
7.3.a
Packet Pg. 305 Attachment: Ordinance for Remote Participation Boards Commissions-V2 (ECC Amendment to Allow Boards/Commissions Remote
B. Members participating in a board or commission meeting remotely, as provided for in ECC 1.05.010,
shall be counted towards the number of members required to constitute a quorum by the regulations
pertaining to each board or commission, provided in Title 10 ECC.
Section 3. Severability. If any section, subsection, clause, sentence, or phrase of this ordinance
should be held invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining
portions of this ordinance.
Section 4. Effective Date. This ordinance is subject to referendum and shall take effect thirty
(30) days after final passage of this ordinance.
APPROVED:
MAYOR DAVE EARLING
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED:
CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY:
BY
JEFF TARADAY
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
PUBLISHED:
EFFECTIVE DATE:
ORDINANCE NO.
7.3.a
Packet Pg. 306 Attachment: Ordinance for Remote Participation Boards Commissions-V2 (ECC Amendment to Allow Boards/Commissions Remote
SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. __________
of the City of Edmonds, Washington
On the ____ day of ___________, 2018, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed
Ordinance No. _____________. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting of the
title, provides as follows:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING
CHAPTER 1.05 OF THE EDMONDS CITY CODE TO ALLOW FOR REMOTE
PARTICIPATION BY MEMBERS CITY BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS.
.
The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request.
DATED this _____ day of ________________, 2018.
CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY
4840-7251-8158, v. 1
7.3.a
Packet Pg. 307 Attachment: Ordinance for Remote Participation Boards Commissions-V2 (ECC Amendment to Allow Boards/Commissions Remote
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 02/20/2018
Discussion of current Council Committees and possible changes to those Committees
Staff Lead: Maureen Judge
Department: City Council
Preparer: Maureen Judge
Background/History
Council last made changes to Council Committee structure in the summer of 2017. At the February 6th
Council meeting Council President Nelson asked members for suggestions on changing, improving, or
keeping the status quo on Council Committee structure.
Staff Recommendation
N/A
Narrative
Council will continue discussion of Council Committee structure and possibly take ACTION to change
structure. Suggestions/comments from City Council members at the Feb. 6th meeting include:
· Move Planning & Parks to another committee other than Parks, Planning & Public Works (PPP)
so that Public Works can focus mostly on Public Works project?
· Should the PPP committee switch with another committee and move into Council Chambers?
Public interest is high for Public Works projects and the jury meeting room gets full. (Council
already took action on this on 2/13)
· Should the Council return to one Committee meeting per month and three Business meetings?
Meetings are running late because there is so much business to cover.
· Should Council change structure to one Committee night and one study-session night to allow
more time for each subject?
· Should Committee meeting night only be for Committee work. Business meetings have occurred
every week including on Committee night meetings and there has not been a night dedicated to
just Committee meeting work.
7.4
Packet Pg. 308
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 02/20/2018
Council Committee Reports and Minutes
Staff Lead: Council
Department: City Clerk's Office
Preparer: Scott Passey
Background/History
N/A
Staff Recommendation
N/A
Narrative
This is an opportunity for the Council to report on items discussed in their committee meetings. The
committee meeting minutes are attached.
Attachments:
FC021318
PPP021318
PSP021318
8.1
Packet Pg. 309
Minutes
FINANCE COMMITTEE MEETING
February 13, 2018
_________________________________________________________________________________
Elected Officials Present Staff Present
Councilmember Dave Teitzel (Chair) Scott James, Finance Director
Councilmember Diane Buckshnis Dave Turley, Assistant Finance Director
Carrie Hite, Parks & Recreation Director
Jerrie Bevington, Recorder
The meeting was called to order at 7:15 p.m. in Council Chambers. The following items were added to
the agenda:
• Item 5: Pending Ordinances regarding the Edmonds Marsh, Opioid Response and
Homelessness
• Item 6: Sno-Isle Library
• Item 7: Budget Process Improvements
• Item 8: Potential Funding Options for Snohomish County Emergency Radio System (SERS)
• Item 9: Utility Tax Payments
1. Preliminary December 2017 Quarterly Financial Report
Councilmembers Teitzel and Buckshnis complimented Mr. James and Mr. Turley for the City’s receipt
of the Certificate of Achievement in Financial Reporting for both the 2016 Comprehensive Annual
Financial Report (CAFR) and for the 2016 PAFR.
Mr. Turley highlighted:
• General Fund revenues higher than budget
• General Fund expenditures under budget
• REET revenue higher than budget and higher than 2016
• Personal and EMS property taxes higher than budget and higher than 2016
• Sales tax higher than budget and higher than 2016
• Possible interfund to Combined Street Construction/Improvement Fund
Staff responded to questions and discussion followed regarding cities that do/do not prepare a CAFR,
under budget General Fund expenditures, budgeting by priorities, LEOFF-Medical Insurance Reserve,
actuarial study of LEOFF retirees, expectation that sales tax will decline in 2018, fire construction
inspection fees 2017 compared to 2016, building permit revenue, technology rental fund carryover for
technology upgrades, professional services expenditures lower than budget, police holiday buyback,
REET revenue forecasts, and increases in annual investment income.
Action: Schedule for presentation to full Council
2. Capital Asset Policy
Committee members and staff discussed the value and description of small and attractive assets,
timing of annual audit of small and attractive assets, threshold for capital assets, adding “electronic” to
the description of small and attractive assets and extending the date of the annual inventory of small
and attractive assets.
8.1.a
Packet Pg. 310 Attachment: FC021318 (Council Committee Reports)
02/13/18 Finance Committee Minutes, Page 2
Action: Further discussion with directors regarding the date of the inventory of small and attractive
assets. Return to committee followed by brief presentation to full Council.
3. Draft Finance Committee 2018 Work Plan
Mr. James reviewed the proposed work plan for existing policies/codes, potential policies to develop
and policy amendment & development schedule. Discussion followed regarding an earlier draft of a
budget policy, and prioritizing policies to be developed.
Action: Return policies to committee for review.
4. 2018 Carryforward Budget Amendments
Mr. James summarized budget amendments:
• Revenue: $1,116,853
• Expenditures: $4,657,722
Mr. James and Ms. Hite responded to questions regarding removal of the abandoned boat at Marina
Beach Park and reimbursement of costs via a DNR program, and telephone/networking preliminary
work. Committee suggested adding to the description of the entryway sign that the cost includes
design, fabrication and installation.
Action: Schedule on Consent Agenda
5. Pending Ordinances regarding the Edmonds Marsh, Opioid Response Fund and
Homelessness Fund
Committee members and staff reviewed a proposed ordinance regarding Edmonds Marsh
Restoration/Preservation Fund and offered several revisions. Discussion followed regarding
similarities/differences of the Edmonds Marsh Fund and other trust funds, other funds established in
code, administration of the Edmonds Marsh Fund, and restricting use of citizen donations but not City
contributions. Councilmember Buckshnis will review the draft ordinance and return for further
committee review.
Mr. James reported on discussions related to the Opioid Response Fund and Homelessness Fund.
Discussion followed regarding homeless individuals the Lynnwood/Edmonds social worker
encounters, the Homelessness Task Force assisting with development of an ordinance, hiring a
consultant to assist with determining how to distribute funds, determining a target for homelessness
funds such as housing for families with children, developing a mechanism for disbursing funds and
accepting contributions, using the City’s allocation to leverage grant funds, distributing funds via a
grant program, and Council authorization required for any spending. Staff will draft ordinance for
review by Homelessness Task Force.
Action: Edmonds Marsh Fund ordinance return to committee for further review. Staff draft
Homelessness Fund ordinance for review by Homelessness Task Force.
6. Sno-Isle Library
Councilmember Teitzel relayed the property taxes collected by Sno-Isle Edmonds from citizens
exceed Sno-Isle’s investment in the Edmonds Library which equates to Edmonds subsidizing the Sno-
Isle Library system. The amounts Sno-Isle collects from other Snohomish County cities was provided
at a previous Finance Committee meeting; Mr. James has researched the amounts collected from
Island County cities.
8.1.a
Packet Pg. 311 Attachment: FC021318 (Council Committee Reports)
02/13/18 Finance Committee Minutes, Page 3
Mr. James reported on a meeting he, Mayor Earling and City Attorney Jeff Taraday had with the Sno-
Isle Director and Assistant Director regarding the disparity. A future meeting is being scheduled to
determine how this can be rectified. Discussion followed regarding options for rectifying the situation.
Action: Finance Committee discuss again after City staff’s second meeting with Sno-Isle staff
7. Budget Process Improvements
Councilmember Teitzel relayed his concern that changes are proposed very late in the budget
process and that practice not allowing enough opportunity for citizens and Councilmembers to ask
questions. He distributed information from several other several cities regarding budget retreats,
budgeting methods, and requiring Council proposed budget amendments to be submitted in writing.
Discussion followed regarding concern that amendments proposed late in the process do not allow
adequate time for citizen and/or Council consideration/comment, plans to discuss the CIP/CFP earlier
in the process, and staff including Council requests in the budget,
Action: Request Council President Nelson include this topic on the budget retreat agenda
8. Potential Funding Options for Snohomish County Emergency Radio System (SERS)
Mr. James relayed Mayor Earling organized a meeting with representatives of Marysville, Everett,
Lynnwood and Edmonds to discuss SERS funding. Options include property tax and sales tax. A
meeting with the cities’ Finance Directors is being scheduled. Discussion followed regarding pros and
cons of funding options and other funding options such as a phone user fee.
Action: Information only
9. Utility Tax Payments
Mr. James distributed code language regarding utility tax payments. He suggested revising the code
to define a threshold (such as $10,000) to bill monthly versus quarterly.
Action: Schedule for full Council
The meeting was adjourned at 8:55 p.m.
8.1.a
Packet Pg. 312 Attachment: FC021318 (Council Committee Reports)
Minutes
PARKS, PLANNING AND PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE MEETING
February 13, 2018
Elected Officials Present Staff Present
Councilmember Neil Tibbott (Chair) Phil Williams, Public Works Director
Councilmember Kristiana Johnson Rob English, City Engineer
Carrie Hite, Parks & Recreation Director
Jeff Taraday, City Attorney
Jeannie Dines, Recorder
The meeting was called to order at 7:14 p.m. in the Jury Meeting Room.
1. Crumb Rubber Extension of Moratorium
Ms. Hite reported the Council was interested in two studies, 1) the California EPA study, and 2) a federal
study that is a collaboration between three agencies; neither of the studies have been published yet but
are expected to be published by June 2018. Mr. Taraday drafted an ordinance extending the moratorium
to July 15, providing time for the study results, Council discussion, and possibly hold public hearings.
The moratorium could then be allowed to expire, the Council could extend it further, etc.
Councilmember Johnson expressed concern with the short turnaround once the studies are published.
Councilmember Tibbott relayed the previous ordinance stated the Council intends to hold a public
hearing in January 2018 prior to extending the moratorium and asked if a public hearing was required
before extending the moratorium. Mr. Taraday advised because this is not a GMA moratorium, state
law does not require a public hearing be conducted prior to extending the moratorium. If the Council felt
now was an appropriate time to hear from the public, a public hearing could be held after the moratorium
was extended. The Council always has the ability to repeal an extended moratorium. Councilmember
Tibbott suggested Mr. Taraday provide a memo to Council with that information
Following further discussion, the Committee provided the following direction:
• Revise ordinance to change date of moratorium extension from July 15 to August 7
• Revise language in Section 3B to be more open ended regarding when a public hearing would
be conducted
• Mr. Taraday draft memo to Council regarding holding a public hearing
Action: Schedule for full Council next week.
2. Briefing on the City-Wide Pavement Rating Report
Mr. Williams reviewed:
• Why rate pavement?
o Assess overall health of the City street system
o Prioritize streets for preservation and/or reconstruction efforts
o Facilitate long range financial forecasts
o Required for some grant applications
• How is pavement rated?
o Pavement condition index (PCI)
▪ Developed by US Army Corps of Engineers
▪ Two primary methods
8.1.b
Packet Pg. 313 Attachment: PPP021318 (Council Committee Reports)
02/13/18 PPP Committee Minutes, Page 2
1. Pavement can be walked by trained and certified pavement rater
➢ Less expensive
➢ Can be accomplished by City staff
➢ Highly subjective, grades are subject to human variance
2. Pavement can be driven by a specialized ruck with laser-assed grading
➢ Lasers collect data grades are objective and repeatable
➢ Cannot be accomplished by City Staff, must be contracted out
▪ System analyses surface distresses such as cracking, rutting, patching, etc.
▪ Distress measurements used to grade streets 0-100
• 2017 City of Edmonds Pavement Rating
o IMS (Infrastructure Management Services) brought in for laser-assisted rating
▪ $43,450 contract signed in March 2017
▪ IMS moved into Edmonds in mid-July
▪ Survey collected data on all city-owned streets (not alleys)
▪ Scores were compiled and moved into a pavement management spreadsheet
▪ Recommendations were made for future annual budget
• 2017 Pavement Rating Results
o Average Scores
▪ Principal arterials – 77
▪ Minor arterials – 76
▪ Collectors – 77
▪ Local – 70
▪ Total – 72
o Net worth of road network - $118 million
o Total backlog (failed streets) approx. 3%
• Graph of asphalt performance over time
• Graph of when improvements could be done
o Slurry seal (5-10 yrs)
o Chip seal (10-17 yrs)
o Overlay (17-25 yrs)
o Rebuild (25-40 yr)
• Budget Recommendations
o Scenarios
▪ 2.6M/yr – City road network maintains approximate PCI score of 72
▪ 2.2M/yr – City road network lowers to and maintains PCI score of 70
▪ 1.5M/yr – PCI steadily drops. Anything less than 1.5 M causes backlog to skyrocket
▪ 0.0M/yr – After only 7 years, PCI plummets to 63 and backlog quadruples
• Map of 2014-2018 overlays
• Detailed map of 2018 overlay
• 2017 Pavement Preservation Budget
2017 Overlay Budget $1,135,000
2016 Carryover $150,000
Total Revenue $1,285,000
2017 Expenditures $837,636
2018 Carryover (budget amendment) $442,000
o County routinely overestimates costs
• 2018 Pavement Preservation Budget
2018 Overlay Budget $1,500,000
2017 Carryover $442,000
Total Revenue $1,942,000
• City will not be able to use the county paving program after 2018
o City will develop its own package for 2019 paving
• Too late to add $442,000 to county paving program
8.1.b
Packet Pg. 314 Attachment: PPP021318 (Council Committee Reports)
02/13/18 PPP Committee Minutes, Page 3
o If Council approves carryover, intent to use to build ramps as part of 2019 and 2020 paving
program.
Mr. Williams responded to questions and discussion followed regarding PSRC’s distribution of federal
funds for paving, information the pavement rating provides, crack sealing, IMS scoring done on only
City Streets not state highways, condition of specific road sections, streets to be slurry sealed, Council
approval of funds for overlays in the budget, budget scenarios do not include ADA (typically an
additional 30%), whether an in-house crew could do curb ramps, coordinating future paving program
with other cities for economies of scale, issues associated with proposal for an in-house crew to do
walkways/sidewalks/ramps, issues associated with using existing maintenance staff for capital projects,
accelerating construction of short sidewalks and missing sidewalk sections, and Council support for
establishing an in-house crew to construct walkways, sidewalks and ramps.
Action: For April PPP meeting, staff develop costs of constructing walkways, sidewalks, and ramps in-
house versus via contract and the process and issues associated with developing an in-house crew.
3. Presentation of an Interlocal Agreement with the Edmonds School District to Fund
Overlay of 236th St. from 94th Ave to 92nd Ave
Mr. English explained as part of construction of Madrona School, ESD will be doing frontage
improvements on 236th. The City planned to pave the other side of 236th; via this interlocal ESD will
overlay the entire street and the City will fund half. Cost is approximately $38,000.
Action: Schedule on Consent Agenda
4. Report on Bids for the 238th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Hwy 99)
Mr. English explained the federal and state government pulled rectangular rapid flashing beacons from
the allowable transportation devices due to a patent issue. This addendum, to replace the rectangular
flashing beacon with a round flashing beacon required bid opening be postponed to Thursday.
Committee members disagreed whether the report on bids should return to committee or be forwarded
to Council for action.
Action: Council President make decision whether to schedule for action at the next Council meeting or
returned to committee.
5. Report on Bids for the Northstream Pipe Abandonment and Culvert Rehabilitation Project
Mr. English explained this project is to abandon 600 lineal feet of storm pipe that originally conveyed
Northstream Creek and was left over from an emergency project in 2006 to redirect the creek. The
project also rehabilitates the storm culvert running under SR 524 at approximately 11th Place North.
Bids were opened last Tuesday. The engineer’s estimate was $294,524; the low bid of $273,985 was
submitted by Trimaxx. The construction budget will be $273,985, management reserve of 20%
($54,797) and 15% construction management for a total of approximately $370,000 which is well within
the funding allocated in the stormwater fund. A brief discussion followed regarding construction
management.
Action: Schedule on Consent Agenda
6. Report on Bids for the Five Corners Reservoir Re-Coating Project
Mr. English reported bids were opened Thursday, the City received five bids. The engineer’s estimate
was $2.9 million; the low bid of $2.43 million was thrown out due to a documentation error. The second
8.1.b
Packet Pg. 315 Attachment: PPP021318 (Council Committee Reports)
02/13/18 PPP Committee Minutes, Page 4
and third low bids are being reviewed and staff is conferring with the City Attorney tomorrow regarding
the required experience. Discussion followed regarding the amount of the second and third low bids,
the paint color, and drying the tank interior prior to painting.
Action: Staff return to PPP Committee in two weeks with bid recommendation and paint color
7. Presentation of a Supplemental Agreement with Murraysmith (formerly MSA) for Five
Corners Reservoir Re-Coating Project
Mr. English reported a supplemental agreement with Murraysmith is necessary for engineering support
during the construction phase of the reservoir re-coating project. The fee is $107,846 which includes
support for reviewing RFIs, change orders, and special inspections.
Action: Schedule on Consent Agenda
Discussion followed regarding potentially raising the authorization threshold for Public Works projects,
identifying efficiencies for the PPP Committee, analyzing project values brought to the PPP Committee
during the past year and the committee’s recommendation, impacts of changing to one committee
meeting/month, and a suggestion to start committee meetings at 6 p.m.
The meeting was adjourned at 9:00 p.m.
8.1.b
Packet Pg. 316 Attachment: PPP021318 (Council Committee Reports)
Minutes
PUBLIC SAFETY & PERSONNEL COMMITTEE MEETING
February 13, 2018
Elected Officials Present Staff Present
Councilmember Tom Mesaros (Chair) Al Compaan, Police Chief
Councilmember Adrienne Fraley-Monillas Patrick Doherty, Econ. Dev/Comm. Serv. Dir.
The meeting was called to order at 7:12 p.m. in the Police Training Room
1. Special Event Parking Discussion
Chief Compaan referred to a letter in the Edmonds Beacon from an individual who received a parking
citation for parking all day in a 3-hour zone which raises the issue of day-long events that necessitate
attendees finding all-day parking. Options include, 1) venues informing attendees and perhaps
providing a map of parking areas outside the 3-hour zone, 2) special event permit process, or 3)
shuttle.
Discussion followed regarding pros and cons of events/venues providing a parking pass, identifying
parking lots with whom a venue/event could coordinate parking, insurance indemnification for public
parking on private property, and the BID’s program for after hour and weekend parking,
Action: Refer to Mr. Doherty for discussion with ad hoc parking recommendation group
2. ECC Amendment to Allow Boards/Commissions Remote Participation
Mr. Doherty distributed the revised ordinance and described the issue raised by the Economic
Development Commission regarding how to accommodate members participating by phone. At the
previous the PSP Committee meeting, it was suggested the rules regarding remote participation apply
to all boards and commission.
Discussion followed regarding other cities’ practices, importance of members attending meetings in
person, circumstances that allow remote participation, importance of allowing remote participants to
vote and count toward quorum, reasons for absences, and ability to participate remotely encouraging
absent members to participate. Mr. Doherty will research other cities’ practices and revise ordinance
to require attendance at entire meeting and reduce remote participation to twice a year.
Action: Forward to full Council with above information/revisions
The meeting was adjourned at 7:40 p.m.
8.1.c
Packet Pg. 317 Attachment: PSP021318 (Council Committee Reports)