The URL can be used to link to this page

2018-10-16 City Council - Full Agenda-2207Agenda Edmonds City Council COUNCIL CHAMBERS 250 5TH AVE NORTH, EDMONDS, WA 98020 OCTOBER 16, 2018, 7:00 PM Edmonds City Council Agenda October 16, 2018 Page 1 1. CALL TO ORDER/FLAG SALUTE 2. ROLL CALL 3. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA 4. APPROVAL OF THE CONSENT AGENDA 1. Approval of Council Meeting Minutes of October 9, 2018 2. Approval of claim checks. 3. August 2018 Monthly Financial Report 4. Critical Area Regulations for Wetlands 5. Street Dedication at 7922 180th Ave W 6. Street Dedication at 18807 88th Ave W. 7. Pedestrian Easement at 8609 244th St.SW 8. WWTP Job Descriptions 9. Excelsior Place Street Vacation - Resolution of Intent to Vacate 5. PRESENTATIONS 1. Presentation of Policy Recommendations from Diversity Commission (20 min) 6. AUDIENCE COMMENTS (3-MINUTE LIMIT PER PERSON) - REGARDING MATTERS NOT LISTED ON THE AGENDA AS CLOSED RECORD REVIEW OR AS PUBLIC HEARINGS 7. ACTION ITEMS 1. Closed Record Review of the Planning Board’s recommendation to approve an application for rezone at 9111 and 9107 — 236th St. SW. from Single-Family Residential (RS-8) to Multiple Residential (RM-1.5) (20 min) 2. Third Quarter 2018 Budget Amendment (10 min) 8. STUDY ITEMS 1. Mayor's Recommendation on the Edmonds Street Waterfront Connector Project (25 min) 2. 2019 Budget Presentations (60 min) 3. Discussion on Prohibiting Expanded Polystyrene (EPS or “Styrofoam”) in Food Packaging (20 min) 9. COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS AND MINUTES 1. Council Committee Reports and Minutes (10 min) 10. MAYOR'S COMMENTS Edmonds City Council Agenda October 16, 2018 Page 2 11. COUNCIL COMMENTS 12. CONVENE IN EXECUTIVE SESSION REGARDING PENDING OR POTENTIAL LITIGATION PER RCW 42.30.110(1)(I). 13. RECONVENE IN OPEN SESSION. POTENTIAL ACTION AS A RESULT OF MEETING IN EXECUTIVE SESSION. ADJOURN City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 10/16/2018 Approval of Council Meeting Minutes of October 9, 2018 Staff Lead: Scott Passey Department: City Clerk's Office Preparer: Scott Passey Background/History N/A Staff Recommendation Review and approve the draft meeting minutes on the Consent Agenda. Narrative N/A Attachments: 10-09-2018 Draft Council Meeting Minutes 4.1 Packet Pg. 3 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 9, 2018 Page 1 EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL DRAFT MINUTES October 9, 2018 ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT Dave Earling, Mayor Michael Nelson, Council President Kristiana Johnson, Councilmember Thomas Mesaros, Councilmember Adrienne Fraley-Monillas, Councilmember Diane Buckshnis, Councilmember Dave Teitzel, Councilmember Neil Tibbott, Councilmember STAFF PRESENT Jim Lawless, Assistant Police Chief Phil Williams, Public Works Director Carrie Hite, Parks, Rec. & Cult. Serv. Dir. Patrick Doherty, Econ. Dev & Comm. Serv. Dir. Shane Hope, Development Services Director Scott James, Finance Director Dave Turley, Assistant Finance Director Rob English, City Engineer Jeff Taraday, City Attorney Scott Passey, City Clerk Jerrie Bevington, Camera Operator Jeannie Dines, Recorder 1. CALL TO ORDER/FLAG SALUTE The Edmonds City Council meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Mayor Earling in the Council Chambers, 250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds. The meeting was opened with the flag salute. 2. ROLL CALL City Clerk Scott Passey called the roll. All elected officials were present. 3. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TIBBOTT, TO APPROVE THE AGENDA IN CONTENT AND ORDER. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 4. APPROVAL OF THE CONSENT AGENDA COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL, TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. The agenda items approved are as follows: 1. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF OCTOBER 2, 2018 2. APPROVAL OF CLAIM, PAYROLL AND BENEFIT CHECKS, DIRECT DEPOSIT AND WIRE PAYMENTS 3. ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT OF CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES TOTALING $2,081.08 AND AN AMOUNT UNDETERMINED 5. PRESENTATIONS 4.1.a Packet Pg. 4 Attachment: 10-09-2018 Draft Council Meeting Minutes (Approval of Council Meeting Minutes) Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 9, 2018 Page 2 1. EMERGENCY NURSES WEEK PROCLAMATION Mayor Earling said this proclamation was of personal interest to him; 13 years ago he was in the emergency room and the hospital did a wonderful job. He read a proclamation proclaiming October 7-13, 2018 Emergency Nurses Week in the City of Edmonds and calling upon all citizens to recognize and honor the great contributions of emergency nurses to our community and society. He presented the proclamation to Mike Hastings, Manager, Swedish Edmonds Emergency Department. Mr. Hastings said Swedish Edmonds Emergency Department, the largest and busiest emergency department in the Swedish system, will serve about 53,000 patients this year. He recognized members of the emergency nurse team in the audience and thanked the Council for honoring and recognizing the great care that the emergency care team provides every day. 2. PRESENTATION OF THE PROPOSED 2019 CITY BUDGET Mayor Earling presented the 2019 budget message. Members of the Edmonds City Council, Staff and Citizens: I am pleased to present the City of Edmonds 2019 Proposed Budget. As most of us would acknowledge, we continue to have a strong economy across the nation, state and region. We in Edmonds have also been obvious beneficiaries of the strong economy. Whether Downtown, in Westgate, or along Highway 99, we have witnessed a sustained and growing energy in our community these past several years. Younger families moving in, strong sales tax revenues, new construction projects, and a growing and exciting business community. Yet, we also know the economic "bump in the road" will show up at some point. Consider this: we are in the 112th month of sustained economic growth. The record duration of an economic expansion is 120 months. With that in mind, prudence dictates that we begin to focus on that fact and not engage in excessive spending. And I know I’m not alone among regional mayors in recognizing this reality. Nevertheless, our current city economy is very strong. To be blunt, we have had another banner revenue year; as an example, our sales tax has again set a record of over$8,000,000. However, as I mentioned, we also know how important it is to pay very close attention to the trends in local revenue generation. And to be equally blunt, amid the financial successes there are also sobering signs that we need to, and will, seriously consider. So also consider this: In the past few months, automobile sales, while still strong, have begun to slow. And we have all heard the reports of real estate sales leveling off, with fewer properties receiving multiple offers, and in some cases, price reductions. Also our building permit activity, while still good, has similarly slowed. These are three important indicators we need to closely watch. Are we now saying we are on the brink of a recession? No! We expect the economy to remain healthy in 2019. However, recent indications tell us to pay very close attention to shifting trends. So the budget this year is a mix of new, one-time expenditures and some additions which require long- term financial commitments. A few important examples to highlight: While we have included limited staff additions in the 2019 budget, there are two additional Public Works positions, a new Safety and Risk Management Coordinator position, a half-time position for the newly created Youth Commission, and a School Resource Officer for Scriber Lake High School located at the former Woodway High School. This last position is funded with the same-cost sharing arrangement we have with the Edmonds School District at Edmonds-Woodway High School. 4.1.a Packet Pg. 5 Attachment: 10-09-2018 Draft Council Meeting Minutes (Approval of Council Meeting Minutes) Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 9, 2018 Page 3 Council is aware that South Snohomish County Fire & Rescue has not yet settled their union agreement, so we have set aside an additional $495,000 for its estimated impact on our budget. We will continue to improve our street overlay program with an additional $1.5 million dollars. We are still trying to catch-up in this area from previous years of neglect. We will also increase our building repair and maintenance fund for city buildings from $400,000 to $700,000. Again catch-up from years of lack of attention. With the increasing growth in our city, we have included $75,000 for a needed downtown parking study, as well as $2.5 M for City-Wide Pedestrian Safety Improvement projects. We will also commit $4.3M to the beach rehabilitation and parking improvements associated with the Waterfront Center in 2019. We have been setting aside our dollars and have also secured approximately $1.125M in grants. As Council knows, you gave the Administration a series of priorities you would like to include in the budget. For many of these initiatives we are on the same page as they are also priorities for the administration. Our rough calculation for your variety of requests is $1.88M. With that in mind, we cannot fully fund all of your requested priorities; however, the list and amounts we have included in the budget are: 1) Sidewalk improvements: $323,000. This includes the afore-mentioned 2 Public Works employees 2) ECA funding for operations: $75,000 3) Transitional Housing: $250,000 (It is hoped council would include an additional $250,000 from their 2018 budget for a total of $500,000) 4) Waterfront Center: $250,000 5) Marsh enhancements: $100,000 6) Additional $1 per capita to the Health District above the existing $1 per capita commitment Longer term, while our economy remains strong in the short term, our five-year projection shows some economic softening, which would send us modestly into the red by the fifth year. We will continue to monitor the trends, and over the next year, if that trend holds true, either we will need to have further strengthened our tax base or we will need to consider other sources such as additional Transportation Benefit District fees or raising EMS fees. Council and citizens of Edmonds, we have a successful, energetic community with an exciting and quality business community. We have every reason to expect that to continue. As I have mentioned before, we continue to grow our reputation as a Puget Sound area daytime destination, drawing visitors from throughout the region. We have a strong and growing health-care sector. More and more families are moving to Edmonds, seeking quality schools and housing opportunities. Downtown has become a lively destination for shopping, dining and entertainment. All of this has benefitted our local economy greatly and will continue to be the cornerstones of our local economic strength. In closing we need to thank staff, Directors and most of all our fine Finance Department for their patience and hard work in assembling the 2019 City of Edmonds budget. Finance Director Scott James James distributed 2019 budget books. 68. ADJOURN TO COMMITTEE MEETINGS With no further business, the Council meeting was adjourned to committee meetings at 7:16 p.m. (Parks & Public Works Committee in Council Chambers, Finance Committee in the Jury Meeting Room and Public Safety, Personnel & Planning Committee in the Police Training Room.) 4.1.a Packet Pg. 6 Attachment: 10-09-2018 Draft Council Meeting Minutes (Approval of Council Meeting Minutes) City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 10/16/2018 Approval of claim checks. Staff Lead: Scott James Department: Administrative Services Preparer: Nori Jacobson Background/History Approval of claim checks #233472 through #233626 dated October 11, 2018 for $447,303.24. Staff Recommendation Approval of claim checks. Narrative In accordance with the State statutes, City payments must be approved by the City Council. Ordinance #2896 delegates this approval to the Council President who reviews and recommends either approval or non-approval of expenditures. Attachments: claims 10-11-18 FrequentlyUsedProjNumbers 10-11-18 4.2 Packet Pg. 7 10/11/2018Voucher ListCity of Edmonds110:22:44AMPage:vchlistBank code :usbankVoucherDateVendorInvoicePO #Description/AccountAmount23347210/11/2018076040 911 SUPPLY INC 65514INV#65514 - EDMONDS PD - K. BROWN8560W-04-2 BLAUER TROUSER LOW DRK NAVY001.000.41.521.22.24.00 79.9910.0% Sales Tax001.000.41.521.22.24.00 8.00INV#65519 - EDMONDS PD - K. BROWN65519PC90P- NAVY PORT & CO XS ULT SWEATPANT001.000.41.521.22.24.00 18.9910.0% Sales Tax001.000.41.521.22.24.00 1.90Total :108.8823347310/11/2018065052 AARD PEST CONTROL 14911MEADOWDALE CC PEST CONTROL CUST 1-23276MEADOWDALE CC PEST CONTROL CUST 1-23276001.000.64.576.80.41.00 80.0010.3% Sales Tax001.000.64.576.80.41.00 8.24PM & SENIOR CENTER PEST CONTROL CUST 1-114940PM & SENIOR CENTER PEST CONTROL CUST001.000.64.576.80.41.00 125.0010.3% Sales Tax001.000.64.576.80.41.00 12.88Total :226.1223347410/11/2018061029 ABSOLUTE GRAPHIX 1018527P&R LEAGUE SHIRTSP&R LEAGUE SHIRTS001.000.64.571.25.31.00 1,605.0010.4% Sales Tax001.000.64.571.25.31.00 166.92Total :1,771.9223347510/11/2018072189 ACCESS INFORMATION MANAGEMENT 2834159STORAGE OF DOCUMENTS 10/01/18 - 10/31/18STORAGE OF DOCUMENTS 10/01/2018 -001.000.25.514.30.41.00 121.691Page:4.2.aPacket Pg. 8Attachment: claims 10-11-18 (Approval of claim checks.) 10/11/2018Voucher ListCity of Edmonds210:22:44AMPage:vchlistBank code :usbankVoucherDateVendorInvoicePO #Description/AccountAmount(Continued)Total :121.6923347510/11/2018072189072189 ACCESS INFORMATION MANAGEMENT23347610/11/2018069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 1990919597PARKS MAINT UNIFORM SERVICEPARKS MAINT UNIFORM SERVICE001.000.64.576.80.24.00 56.86Total :56.8623347710/11/2018068245 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES INC 46081E5FD.SERVICES THRU 9/16/18E5FD.Services thru 9/16/18422.000.72.594.31.65.41 2,862.50Total :2,862.5023347810/11/2018001795 AUTOGRAPHICS 82412UNIT 527 - VEHICLE GRAPHICS REPLACEMENTSUnit 527 - Vehicle Graphics Replacements511.000.77.548.68.48.00 265.0010.3% Sales Tax511.000.77.548.68.48.00 27.30Total :292.3023347910/11/2018070305 AUTOMATIC FUNDS TRANSFER 103617OUT SOURCING OF UTILITY BILLSUB Outsourcing area Printing #600422.000.72.531.90.49.00 34.67UB Outsourcing area Printing #600421.000.74.534.80.49.00 34.67UB Outsourcing area Printing #600423.000.75.535.80.49.00 35.73UB Outsourcing area Postage #600421.000.74.534.80.42.00 131.04UB Outsourcing area Postage #600423.000.75.535.80.42.00 131.0410.1 % Sales Tax422.000.72.531.90.49.00 3.5010.1 % Sales Tax421.000.74.534.80.49.00 3.5010.1 % Sales Tax423.000.75.535.80.49.00 3.612Page:4.2.aPacket Pg. 9Attachment: claims 10-11-18 (Approval of claim checks.) 10/11/2018Voucher ListCity of Edmonds310:22:44AMPage:vchlistBank code :usbankVoucherDateVendorInvoicePO #Description/AccountAmount23347910/11/2018(Continued)070305 AUTOMATIC FUNDS TRANSFEROUT SOURCING OF UTILITY BILLS103753UB Outsourcing area Printing #300422.000.72.531.90.49.00 149.96UB Outsourcing area Printing #300421.000.74.534.80.49.00 149.96UB Outsourcing area Printing #300423.000.75.535.80.49.00 154.49UB Outsourcing area Postage #300421.000.74.534.80.42.00 541.83UB Outsourcing area Postage #300423.000.75.535.80.42.00 541.8210.1 % Sales Tax422.000.72.531.90.49.00 15.1510.1 % Sales Tax421.000.74.534.80.49.00 15.1510.1 % Sales Tax423.000.75.535.80.49.00 15.60Total :1,961.7223348010/11/2018001801 AUTOMATIC WILBERT VAULT CO 56777ROUGH BOX - RODENROUGH BOX - RODEN130.000.64.536.20.34.00 613.00Total :613.0023348110/11/2018076730 AUTONOMY TECHNOLOGY INC 202632-00UNIT E156WR - PARTSUnit E156WR - Parts511.100.77.594.48.64.00 2,821.86Total :2,821.8623348210/11/2018061659 BAILEY'S TRADITIONAL TAEKWON 6861 TAEKWONDO 6861 TAEKWONDO INSTRUCTION6861 TAEKWONDO INSTRUCTION001.000.64.571.27.41.00 735.50Total :735.5023348310/11/2018076618 BALMER, BOB WOTS PRESENTATION WOTS PRESENTATION SERVICES3Page:4.2.aPacket Pg. 10Attachment: claims 10-11-18 (Approval of claim checks.) 10/11/2018Voucher ListCity of Edmonds410:22:44AMPage:vchlistBank code :usbankVoucherDateVendorInvoicePO #Description/AccountAmount23348310/11/2018(Continued)076618 BALMER, BOBWOTS PRESENTATION SERVICES117.100.64.573.20.41.00 265.00Total :265.0023348410/11/2018073158 BARDSLEY, JENNIFER WOTS PRESENTATION WOTS PRESENTATIONWOTS PRESENTATION117.100.64.573.20.41.00 150.00Total :150.0023348510/11/2018076631 BARKER, MICHELLE WOTS PRESENTATION WOTS PRESENTATION SERVICESWOTS PRESENTATION SERVICES117.100.64.573.20.41.00 415.00Total :415.0023348610/11/2018070634 BAUGHER, JANEE WOTS PRESENTATION WOTS PRESENTATION SERVICESWOTS PRESENTATION SERVICES117.100.64.573.20.41.00 330.00Total :330.0023348710/11/2018075594 BENNETT, SOPHIA WOTS PRESENTATION WOTS PRESENTATION SERVICESWOTS PRESENTATION SERVICES117.100.64.573.20.41.00 350.00Total :350.0023348810/11/2018069989 BERK CONSULTING INC 10251-09-18 HOUSING STRATEGYHousing Strategy001.000.62.524.10.41.00 1,675.17Total :1,675.1723348910/11/2018070641 BHARTI KIRCHNER WOTS PRESENTATION WOTS PRESENTATIONWOTS PRESENTATION117.100.64.573.20.41.00 190.00Total :190.0023349010/11/2018069226 BHC CONSULTANTS LLC 10225E5JB.SERVICES THRU 8/24/18E5JB.Services thru 8/24/184Page:4.2.aPacket Pg. 11Attachment: claims 10-11-18 (Approval of claim checks.) 10/11/2018Voucher ListCity of Edmonds510:22:44AMPage:vchlistBank code :usbankVoucherDateVendorInvoicePO #Description/AccountAmount23349010/11/2018(Continued)069226 BHC CONSULTANTS LLC421.000.74.594.34.65.41 9,730.03E5JB.Services thru 8/24/18423.000.75.594.35.65.41 9,730.03E5JB.Services thru 8/24/18422.000.72.594.31.65.41 9,730.03Total :29,190.0923349110/11/2018076770 BLACK-ISHIMURO, CARA WOTS PRESENTATION WOTS PRESENTATIONWOTS PRESENTATION - KEYNOTE117.100.64.573.20.41.00 4,250.00Total :4,250.0023349210/11/2018076741 BLOSSMAN SERVICES INC SO0038459UNIT 284 - PARTSUnit 284 - Parts511.000.77.548.68.31.10 131.61Freight511.000.77.548.68.31.10 9.48Total :141.0923349310/11/2018074307 BLUE STAR GAS 12631FLEET AUTO PROPANE 530.5 GALFleet Auto Propane 530.5 Gal511.000.77.548.68.34.12 882.64Total :882.6423349410/11/2018076341 BRK THRU DIGITAL LLC BID-2068BID/ED! DIGITAL ADVERTISING SEPTEMBER 20BID/Ed! Digital advertising for140.000.61.558.70.41.40 1,500.00Total :1,500.0023349510/11/2018072005 BROCKMANN, KERRY 6896 6886 YOGA 6896 6886 YOGA INSTRUCTION6896 YOGA INSTRUCTION001.000.64.571.27.41.00 623.706886 YOGA INSTRUCTION001.000.64.571.27.41.00 539.006902 6882 PILATES/YOGA INSTRUCTION6902 6882 PILATES5Page:4.2.aPacket Pg. 12Attachment: claims 10-11-18 (Approval of claim checks.) 10/11/2018Voucher ListCity of Edmonds610:22:44AMPage:vchlistBank code :usbankVoucherDateVendorInvoicePO #Description/AccountAmount23349510/11/2018(Continued)072005 BROCKMANN, KERRY6902 PILATES INSTRUCTION001.000.64.571.27.41.00 271.506882 YOGA INSTRUCTION001.000.64.571.27.41.00 793.10Total :2,227.3023349610/11/2018076240 CADMAN MATERIALS INC 1642164STREET - CONCRETEStreet - Concrete111.000.68.542.61.31.00 358.60Env Surcharge111.000.68.542.61.31.00 16.507.7% sales tax111.000.68.542.61.31.00 28.88ROADWAY - ASPHALT5546626Roadway - Asphalt111.000.68.542.31.31.00 157.0010.0% Sales Tax111.000.68.542.31.31.00 15.70ROADWAY - ASPHALT5547080Roadway - Asphalt111.000.68.542.31.31.00 157.0010.0% Sales Tax111.000.68.542.31.31.00 15.70ROADWAY - ASPHALT5548872Roadway - Asphalt111.000.68.542.31.31.00 459.5010.0% Sales Tax111.000.68.542.31.31.00 45.95ROADWAY - ASPHALT5548903Roadway - Asphalt111.000.68.542.31.31.00 675.6410.0% Sales Tax111.000.68.542.31.31.00 67.56ROADWAY - ASPHALT5549225Roadway - Asphalt6Page:4.2.aPacket Pg. 13Attachment: claims 10-11-18 (Approval of claim checks.) 10/11/2018Voucher ListCity of Edmonds710:22:44AMPage:vchlistBank code :usbankVoucherDateVendorInvoicePO #Description/AccountAmount23349610/11/2018(Continued)076240 CADMAN MATERIALS INC111.000.68.542.31.31.00 341.7510.0% Sales Tax111.000.68.542.31.31.00 34.18Total :2,373.9623349710/11/2018076637 CALLANAN MEDIA SERVICES WOTS PRESENTATION WOTS PRESENTATION SERVICESWOTS PRESENTATION SERVICES117.100.64.573.20.41.00 150.00Total :150.0023349810/11/2018018495 CALPORTLAND COMPANY 93893051STREET - CEMENTStreet - Cement111.000.68.542.90.31.00 182.8510.0% Sales Tax111.000.68.542.90.31.00 18.29Total :201.1423349910/11/2018071816 CARLSON, JESSICA 6800 DRAWING6800 ADVENTURES IN DRAWING INSTRUCTION6800 ADVENTURES IN DRAWING INSTRUCTION001.000.64.571.22.41.00 454.30Total :454.3023350010/11/2018076804 CASTER, CAROLYN WOTS AWARDWOTS AWARD FIRST PLACE NONFICTIONWOTS AWARD FIRST PLACE NONFICTION117.100.64.573.20.41.00 100.00Total :100.0023350110/11/2018003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY RN09181012 HELIUMHELIUM001.000.64.576.80.45.00 16.0010.3% Sales Tax001.000.64.576.80.45.00 1.65Total :17.6523350210/11/2018076643 CHRISTY KARRAS EDITORIAL SVCS WOTS PRESENTATION WOTS PRSENTATION SERVICESWOTS PRESENTATION SERVICES7Page:4.2.aPacket Pg. 14Attachment: claims 10-11-18 (Approval of claim checks.) 10/11/2018Voucher ListCity of Edmonds810:22:44AMPage:vchlistBank code :usbankVoucherDateVendorInvoicePO #Description/AccountAmount23350210/11/2018(Continued)076643 CHRISTY KARRAS EDITORIAL SVCS117.100.64.573.20.41.00 150.00Total :150.0023350310/11/2018069457 CITY OF EDMONDS E8CC.ENG20180449 E8CC.ENG20180449 ROW PERMITE8CC.ENG20180449 ROW Permit126.000.68.542.30.41.00 31.04E8CC.ENG20180449 ROW Permit112.000.68.542.30.41.00 124.17E8CC.ENG20180449 ROW Permit422.000.72.542.30.41.00 179.79Total :335.0023350410/11/2018063902 CITY OF EVERETT I18003346WATER QUALITY - WATER LAB ANALYSISWater Quality - Water Lab Analysis421.000.74.534.80.41.00 900.00Total :900.0023350510/11/2018019215 CITY OF LYNNWOOD 14685MEADOWDALE PLAYFIELDS JOINT MAINT/OPERATMEADOWDALE PLAYFIELDS JOINT MAINTENANCE001.000.64.576.80.51.00 35,638.32Total :35,638.3223350610/11/2018073737 CITY OF SEATTLE SU1001358GPS ANNUAL SUBSCRIPTION FOR DATUMSGPS Annual Subscription for Datums421.000.74.534.80.49.00 633.33GPS Annual Subscription for Datums422.000.72.531.40.49.00 633.33GPS Annual Subscription for Datums423.000.75.535.80.49.00 633.34Total :1,900.0023350710/11/2018076642 CLAUDIA CASTRO LUNA WOTS PRESENTATION WOTS PRESENTATIONWOTS PRESENTATION117.300.64.573.20.41.00 400.00WOTS PRESENTATION SERVICESWOTS PRSEENTATION8Page:4.2.aPacket Pg. 15Attachment: claims 10-11-18 (Approval of claim checks.) 10/11/2018Voucher ListCity of Edmonds910:22:44AMPage:vchlistBank code :usbankVoucherDateVendorInvoicePO #Description/AccountAmount23350710/11/2018(Continued)076642 CLAUDIA CASTRO LUNAWOTS PRESENTATION SERVICES117.100.64.573.20.41.00 150.00Total :550.0023350810/11/2018064369 CODE PUBLISHING CO 61393CITY CODE AND COMMUNITY DEVECITY CODE AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT001.000.25.514.30.41.00 136.77Total :136.7723350910/11/2018073135 COGENT COMMUNICATIONS INC OCT-18C/A CITYOFED00001Oct-18 Fiber Optics Internet Connection512.000.31.518.87.42.00 406.10Total :406.1023351010/11/2018074382 CONTECH ENGINEERED SOLUTIONS 17344470STORM - STORMWATER FILTERSStorm - StormWater Filters422.000.72.531.40.31.00 1,310.0010.3% Sales Tax422.000.72.531.40.31.00 134.94Total :1,444.9423351110/11/2018076806 CONVERGENT CORPORATION WOTS AWARDWOTS AWARD FIRST PLACE POETRYWOTS AWARD FIRST PLACE POETRY117.100.64.573.20.41.00 100.00Total :100.0023351210/11/2018071417 CORE & MAIN LP J514975STORM - GRATE AND PIPEStorm - Grate and Pipe422.000.72.531.40.31.00 149.32Freight422.000.72.531.40.31.00 11.7210.3% Sales Tax422.000.72.531.40.31.00 16.58Total :177.6223351310/11/2018065683 CORRY'S FINE DRY CLEANING SEPT 2018DRY CLEANING AUG/SEPT - EDMONDS PD9Page:4.2.aPacket Pg. 16Attachment: claims 10-11-18 (Approval of claim checks.) 10/11/2018Voucher ListCity of Edmonds1010:22:44AMPage:vchlistBank code :usbankVoucherDateVendorInvoicePO #Description/AccountAmount23351310/11/2018(Continued)065683 CORRY'S FINE DRY CLEANINGCLEANING/LAUNDRY AUG/SEPT 2018001.000.41.521.22.24.00 638.61Total :638.6123351410/11/2018069529 D & G BACKHOE INC E6JC.Pmt 5E6JC.PMT 5 THRU 8/31/18E6JC.Pmt 5 thru 8/31/18421.000.74.594.34.65.10 94,672.42E6JC.Ret 5421.000.223.400 -4,291.59Total :90,380.8323351510/11/2018006200 DAILY JOURNAL OF COMMERCE 3340923BUSINESS RECRUITMENT ADS FOR SEPTEMBER 2Business recruitment ads for September001.000.61.558.70.41.40 400.00Total :400.0023351610/11/2018064531 DINES, JEANNIE 18-388210/02/2018 CITY COUNCIL MEETING10/02/2018 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES AND001.000.25.514.30.41.00 404.60Total :404.6023351710/11/2018074592 DRISCOLL, SCOTT WOTS PRESENTATION WOTS PRESENTATIONWOTS PRESENTATION117.100.64.573.20.41.00 475.00Total :475.0023351810/11/2018076807 DULING, JESSICA WOTS AWARDWOTS AWARD FIRST PLACE FICTIONWOTS AWARD FIRST PLACE FICTION117.100.64.573.20.41.00 100.00Total :100.0023351910/11/2018007735 EDMONDS BOOKSHOP BID-5635BID/ED! GRANT REIMBURSEMENT FOR WHERE'SBID/Ed! Grant for Where's Waldo event140.000.61.558.70.41.00 978.04Total :978.0410Page:4.2.aPacket Pg. 17Attachment: claims 10-11-18 (Approval of claim checks.) 10/11/2018Voucher ListCity of Edmonds1110:22:44AMPage:vchlistBank code :usbankVoucherDateVendorInvoicePO #Description/AccountAmount23352010/11/2018076610 EDMONDS HERO HARDWARE 1104PM: PLANT SUPPLIES (ROSE CARE)PM: PLANT SUPPLIES (ROSE CARE)001.000.64.576.81.31.00 45.9810.3% Sales Tax001.000.64.576.81.31.00 4.74PM: SUPPLIES - FLEX TAPE1143PM: SUPPLIES - FLEX TAPE001.000.64.576.80.31.00 13.9910.3% Sales Tax001.000.64.576.80.31.00 1.44Total :66.1523352110/11/2018038500 EDMONDS SENIOR CENTER 2018-10-0110/18 RECREATION SERVICES CONTRACT FEE10/18 Recreation Services Contract Fee001.000.39.569.10.41.00 6,250.00Total :6,250.0023352210/11/2018008688 EDMONDS VETERINARY HOSPITAL 250242INV#250242 - CLIENT#308-10 - EDMONDS PDPREVENTATIVE CARE EXAM $57.00 + FECAL001.000.41.521.26.41.00 102.00BORDETELLA ORAL VACCINE 1 YEAR001.000.41.521.26.31.00 19.00LEPTOSPIROSIS VACCINE 1 YEAR001.000.41.521.26.31.00 19.00ADJUSTMENT ON INV#247194 - CITY DISCOUNTCM247194CITY DISCOUNT ON PREVENTATIVE CARE EXAM001.000.41.521.26.41.00 -11.40ADJUSTMENT ON INV#247925 - CITY DISCOUNTCM247925CITY DISCOUNT ON PREVENTATIVE CARE EXAM001.000.41.521.26.41.00 -11.40ADJUSTMENT ON INV#250242 - CITY DISCOUNTCM250242ADJUSTMENT ON INV#250242 - CITY001.000.41.521.26.41.00 -11.40Total :105.8023352310/11/2018008812 ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINES AR113911INV#AR113911 ACCT#MK5031 - EDMONDS PD11Page:4.2.aPacket Pg. 18Attachment: claims 10-11-18 (Approval of claim checks.) 10/11/2018Voucher ListCity of Edmonds1210:22:44AMPage:vchlistBank code :usbankVoucherDateVendorInvoicePO #Description/AccountAmount23352310/11/2018(Continued)008812 ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINESC1435 - BLACK & WHITE - CONTRACT001.000.41.521.10.45.00 15.7410.3% Sales Tax001.000.41.521.10.45.00 1.62Total :17.3623352410/11/2018071922 ENGLISH, CRAIG WOTS PRESENTATION WOTS PRESENTATIONWOTS PRESENTATION117.100.64.573.20.41.00 200.00Total :200.0023352510/11/2018069469 ENNIS-FLINT INC 227930STREET - ARROWS, WHITE LINES FOR 9TH &Street - Arrows, White Lines for 9th &112.000.68.542.64.41.00 3,650.6410.3% Sales Tax112.000.68.542.64.41.00 376.02Total :4,026.6623352610/11/2018009350 EVERETT DAILY HERALD EDH827187LEGAL AD-PLN20170047Legal Ad-PLN20170047001.000.62.524.10.41.00 63.64Total :63.6423352710/11/2018076449 FAST, SAMANTHA 9/18-9/25 GYM ATTEND9/18-9/25 VOLLEYBALL GYM ATTENDANT9/18-9/25 VOLLEYBALL GYM ATTENDANT001.000.64.571.25.41.00 72.009/20-9/27 VOLLEYBALL GYM ATTENDANT9/20-9/27 GYM ATTEND9/20-9/27 VOLLEYBALL GYM ATTENDANT001.000.64.571.25.41.00 72.00Total :144.0023352810/11/2018066378 FASTENAL COMPANY WAMOU50813 TRAFFIC - SUPPLIESTraffic - Supplies111.000.68.542.64.31.00 26.3610.3% Sales Tax12Page:4.2.aPacket Pg. 19Attachment: claims 10-11-18 (Approval of claim checks.) 10/11/2018Voucher ListCity of Edmonds1310:22:44AMPage:vchlistBank code :usbankVoucherDateVendorInvoicePO #Description/AccountAmount23352810/11/2018(Continued)066378 FASTENAL COMPANY111.000.68.542.64.31.00 2.72WATER / SEWER - MARKING PAINTWAMOU50981Water / Sewer - Marking Paint421.000.74.534.80.31.00 239.04Water / Sewer - Marking Paint423.000.75.535.80.31.00 239.0410.3% Sales Tax421.000.74.534.80.31.00 24.6210.3% Sales Tax423.000.75.535.80.31.00 24.62Total :556.4023352910/11/2018009880 FEDEX6-321-41600 E5AA.SHIPPING DOCUMENTSE5AA.Shipping Documents126.000.68.595.33.65.41 51.37Total :51.3723353010/11/2018069090 FITZGERALD, WAVERLY WOTS PRESENTATION WOTS PRESENTATIONWOTS PRESENTATION117.100.64.573.20.41.00 225.00Total :225.0023353110/11/2018071998 FOSTER, KELSEY BID-8362BID/ED! COPYWRITING FOR OCTOBER 2018BID/Ed! copywriting for October 2018140.000.61.558.70.41.00 600.00Total :600.0023353210/11/2018011900 FRONTIER 425-776-5316425-776-5316 PARKS MAINT FAX LINE425-776-5316 PARKS MAINT FAX LINE001.000.64.576.80.42.00 103.69Total :103.6923353310/11/2018076809 GAGNER, SAMUEL GAGNER 9/18 SWATGAGNER 9/18 EXP CLAIM FOR SWAT TRAININGPER DIEM - SWAT TRAINING 9/23-29001.000.41.521.40.43.00 323.2513Page:4.2.aPacket Pg. 20Attachment: claims 10-11-18 (Approval of claim checks.) 10/11/2018Voucher ListCity of Edmonds1410:22:44AMPage:vchlistBank code :usbankVoucherDateVendorInvoicePO #Description/AccountAmount(Continued)Total :323.2523353310/11/2018076809 076809 GAGNER, SAMUEL23353410/11/2018075316 GEBBEN, CLAIRE WOTS PRESENTATION WOTS PRESENTATIONWOTS PRESENTATION117.100.64.573.20.41.00 150.00Total :150.0023353510/11/2018076778 GO NATIVES! NURSERY 6420STREET - TREE REPLACEMENT ON OVDStreet - Tree Replacement on OVD111.000.68.542.71.31.00 496.5010.0% Sales Tax111.000.68.542.71.31.00 49.65PM: PLANTS - OVD6720PM: PLANTS - OVD001.000.64.576.80.31.00 60.4010.0% Sales Tax001.000.64.576.80.31.00 6.04Total :612.5923353610/11/2018076805 GORBMAN, NANCY ELAINE WOTS AWARDWOTS AWARD SECOND PLACE POETRYWOTS AWARD SECOND PLACE POETRY117.100.64.573.20.41.00 75.00Total :75.0023353710/11/2018076628 GRIEP, CAMILLE WOTS PRESENTATION WOTS PRESENTATIONWOTS PRESENTATION117.100.64.573.20.41.00 150.00Total :150.0023353810/11/2018063819 HALL, LESLIE WOTS PRESENTATION WOTS PRESENTATIONWOTS PRESENTATION117.100.64.573.20.41.00 180.00Total :180.0023353910/11/2018076617 HARRIS, LOIS WOTS PRESENTATION WOTS PRESENTATIONWOTS PRESENTATION117.100.64.573.20.41.00 190.0014Page:4.2.aPacket Pg. 21Attachment: claims 10-11-18 (Approval of claim checks.) 10/11/2018Voucher ListCity of Edmonds1510:22:44AMPage:vchlistBank code :usbankVoucherDateVendorInvoicePO #Description/AccountAmount(Continued)Total :190.0023353910/11/2018076617 076617 HARRIS, LOIS23354010/11/2018010900 HD FOWLER CO INC I4954167WATER INVENTORY - 12 EA #0435Water Inventory - 12 ea #0435421.000.74.534.80.34.20 3,482.40Water Supplies421.000.74.534.80.31.00 395.0410.3% Sales Tax421.000.74.534.80.34.20 358.6810.3% Sales Tax421.000.74.534.80.31.00 40.69WATER INVENTORY - 2 ROLLS #0333I4954172Water Inventory - 2 Rolls #0333421.000.74.534.80.34.20 1,062.0010.3% Sales Tax421.000.74.534.80.34.20 109.39WATER SUPPLIESI4969437Water Supplies421.000.74.534.80.31.00 98.7610.3% Sales Tax421.000.74.534.80.31.00 10.17WATER INVENTORY 2 ROLLS #0333I4969440Water Inventory 2 Rolls #0333421.000.74.534.80.34.20 354.0010.3% Sales Tax421.000.74.534.80.34.20 36.46Total :5,947.5923354110/11/2018066575 HERC RENTALS INC 30245299-001EXCAVATOR FOR ACITY PARK STORAGE SHED GREXCAVATOR FOR CITY PARK STORAGE SHED125.000.64.594.76.65.00 4,305.0010.3% Sales Tax125.000.64.594.76.65.00 443.43Total :4,748.4323354210/11/2018074746 HIGUCHI, ROD 6784 UKELELE 6784 UKELELE INSTRUCTION15Page:4.2.aPacket Pg. 22Attachment: claims 10-11-18 (Approval of claim checks.) 10/11/2018Voucher ListCity of Edmonds1610:22:44AMPage:vchlistBank code :usbankVoucherDateVendorInvoicePO #Description/AccountAmount23354210/11/2018(Continued)074746 HIGUCHI, ROD6784 UKELELE INSTRUCTION001.000.64.571.22.41.00 552.42Total :552.4223354310/11/2018073880 HITE, CARRIE 10/08/2018CLAIM FOR EXPENSESREIMBURSE TRAVEL EXPENSES FOR001.000.64.571.21.43.00 189.00Total :189.0023354410/11/2018061013 HONEY BUCKET 0550814396SEAVIEW PARK HONEY BUCKETSEAVIEW PARK HONEY BUCKET001.000.64.576.80.45.00 111.65Total :111.6523354510/11/2018075966 HULBERT, CARRIE BID-0021BID/ED! PROGRAM MANAGER SEPTEMBER 2018BID/ED! program management for140.000.61.558.70.41.00 2,866.50Total :2,866.5023354610/11/2018076488 HULBERT, MATTHEW STIEG BID-ED2018-08BID/ED! PHOTOGRAPHY SEPTEMBER 2018BID/Ed! photography September 2018140.000.61.558.70.41.00 500.00Total :500.0023354710/11/2018076773 HUTCHINSON, LISA WOTSWOTS CART SERVICES FOR CONFEWOTS CART SERVICES FOR SPECIFIED117.100.64.573.20.41.00 935.00Total :935.0023354810/11/2018060165 HWA GEOSCIENCES INC 28704E5KA.SERVICES THRU 9/29/18E5KA.Services thru 9/29/18421.000.74.594.34.65.41 1,979.80Total :1,979.8023354910/11/2018076769 IDE, JOSEPH DEAN WOTS PRESENTATION WOTS PRESENTATIONWOTS PRESENTATION16Page:4.2.aPacket Pg. 23Attachment: claims 10-11-18 (Approval of claim checks.) 10/11/2018Voucher ListCity of Edmonds1710:22:44AMPage:vchlistBank code :usbankVoucherDateVendorInvoicePO #Description/AccountAmount23354910/11/2018(Continued)076769 IDE, JOSEPH DEAN117.100.64.573.20.41.00 400.00Total :400.0023355010/11/2018073548 INDOFF INCORPORATED 3159179BINDERS FOR PROPOSED BUDGETBinders for proposed budget - Qty 24001.000.31.514.23.31.00 95.5210.3% Sales Tax001.000.31.514.23.31.00 9.84COPY PAPER3159189Copy Paper001.000.62.524.10.31.00 94.84OFFICE SUPPLIES - PAPER3159301OFFICE SUPPLIES - PAPER001.000.64.571.22.31.00 113.8510.3% Sales Tax001.000.64.571.22.31.00 11.73Total :325.7823355110/11/2018014940 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS 300-10047192 UNIT G-10 - CHARGERUnit G-10 - Charger511.000.77.548.68.31.10 44.9510.3% Sales Tax511.000.77.548.68.31.10 4.63UNIT 72 - PLUG300-10047362Unit 72 - Plug511.000.77.548.68.31.10 37.2010.3% Sales Tax511.000.77.548.68.31.10 3.83UNIT G10 - BATTERY621698Unit G10 - Battery511.000.77.548.68.31.10 173.95Core Fee511.000.77.548.68.31.10 57.0010.3% Sales Tax511.000.77.548.68.31.10 17.9217Page:4.2.aPacket Pg. 24Attachment: claims 10-11-18 (Approval of claim checks.) 10/11/2018Voucher ListCity of Edmonds1810:22:44AMPage:vchlistBank code :usbankVoucherDateVendorInvoicePO #Description/AccountAmount23355110/11/2018(Continued)014940 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMSUNIT G04- BATTERY622644Unit G04- Battery511.000.77.548.68.31.10 173.9510.3% Sales Tax511.000.77.548.68.31.10 17.92Total :531.3523355210/11/2018075062 JAMESTOWN NETWORKS 5083FIBER OPTICS INTERNET CONNECTIONOct-18 Fiber Optics Internet Connection512.000.31.518.87.42.00 500.0010.3% Sales Tax512.000.31.518.87.42.00 51.50Total :551.5023355310/11/2018065528 JOHNSON, PATRICK Johnson.ElectrofishJOHNSON.ELECTROFISHING PER DIEMJohnson.Electrofishing Per Diem001.000.67.518.21.43.00 153.00Total :153.0023355410/11/2018065225 KEMPTON, GLORIA WOTS PRESENTATION WOTS PRESENTATION SERVICESWOTS PRESENTATION SERVICES117.100.64.573.20.41.00 985.00Total :985.0023355510/11/2018074958 KENOWER, WILLIAM WOTS PRESENTATION WOTS PRESENTATIONWOTS PRESENTATION117.100.64.573.20.41.00 150.00Total :150.0023355610/11/2018071137 KIDZ LOVE SOCCER 6373 6374 KIDZ LOVE6373 6374 KIDZ LOVE SOCCER INSTRUCTION6373 KIDZ LOVE SOCCER INSTRUCTION001.000.64.571.25.41.00 585.006374 KIDZ LOVE SOCCER INSTRUCTION001.000.64.571.25.41.00 507.006375 6376 KIDZ LOVE SOCCER INSTRUCTION6375 6376 KIDZ LOVE18Page:4.2.aPacket Pg. 25Attachment: claims 10-11-18 (Approval of claim checks.) 10/11/2018Voucher ListCity of Edmonds1910:22:44AMPage:vchlistBank code :usbankVoucherDateVendorInvoicePO #Description/AccountAmount23355610/11/2018(Continued)071137 KIDZ LOVE SOCCER6375 KIDZ LOVE SOCCER INSTRUCTION001.000.64.571.25.41.00 390.006376 KIDZ LOVE SOCCER INSTRUCTION001.000.64.571.25.41.00 234.006377 6583 KIDZ LOVE SOCCER INSTRUCTION6377 6583 KIDZ LOVE6377 KIDZ LOVE SOCCER INSTRUCTION001.000.64.571.25.41.00 195.006583 KIDZ LOVE SOCCER INSTRUCTION001.000.64.571.25.41.00 156.006579 6581 KIDZ LOVE SOCCER INSTRUCTION6579 6581 KIDZ LOVE6579 KIDZ LOVE SOCCER INSTRUCTION001.000.64.571.25.41.00 780.006581 KIDZ LOVE SOCCER INSTRUCTION001.000.64.571.25.41.00 468.006580 6582 KIDZ LOVE SOCCER INSTRUCTION6580 6582 KIDZ LOVE6580 KIDZ LOVE SOCCER INSTRUCTION001.000.64.571.25.41.00 312.006582 KIDZ LOVE SOCCER INSTRUCTION001.000.64.571.25.41.00 663.00Total :4,290.0023355710/11/2018067568 KPG INC 8-3918E7DC.SERVICES THRU 8/25/18E7DC.Services thru 8/25/18112.000.68.595.33.65.41 32,959.09Total :32,959.0923355810/11/2018075848 KUOW PUGET SOUND PUBLIC RADIO IN-1180932972BUSINESS RECRUITMENT RADIO ADS FOR SEPTEBusiness recruitment radio ads for001.000.61.558.70.41.40 2,133.50Total :2,133.5023355910/11/2018074662 LATITUDE GEOGRAPHICS GROUP INV0009839GEOCORTEX ESSENTIALS ANNUAL MAINTGeocortex Essentials Annual Maint001.000.62.558.60.48.00 2,500.00Geocortex Essentials Annual Maint19Page:4.2.aPacket Pg. 26Attachment: claims 10-11-18 (Approval of claim checks.) 10/11/2018Voucher ListCity of Edmonds2010:22:44AMPage:vchlistBank code :usbankVoucherDateVendorInvoicePO #Description/AccountAmount23355910/11/2018(Continued)074662 LATITUDE GEOGRAPHICS GROUP422.000.72.531.90.48.00 625.00Geocortex Essentials Annual Maint111.000.68.542.90.48.00 625.00Geocortex Essentials Annual Maint421.000.74.534.80.48.00 625.00Geocortex Essentials Annual Maint423.000.75.535.80.48.00 625.0010.3% Sales Tax001.000.62.558.60.48.00 257.5010.3% Sales Tax422.000.72.531.90.48.00 64.3810.3% Sales Tax111.000.68.542.90.48.00 64.3810.3% Sales Tax421.000.74.534.80.48.00 64.3810.3% Sales Tax423.000.75.535.80.48.00 64.36Total :5,515.0023356010/11/2018067725 LES SCHWAB TIRE CENTER 805002455546 UNIT 66 - FLAT REPAIRUnit 66 - Flat Repair511.000.77.548.68.48.00 37.0010.3% Sales Tax511.000.77.548.68.48.00 3.81Total :40.8123356110/11/2018076529 LUKAS, MICHAEL DAVID WOTS PRESENTATION WOTS PRESENTATION SERVICESWOTS PRESENTATION SERVICES117.100.64.573.20.41.00 1,400.00Total :1,400.0023356210/11/2018076620 LUNSTRUM, KIRSTEN WOTS PRESENTATION WOTS PRESENTATIONWOTS PRESENTATION117.100.64.573.20.41.00 150.0020Page:4.2.aPacket Pg. 27Attachment: claims 10-11-18 (Approval of claim checks.) 10/11/2018Voucher ListCity of Edmonds2110:22:44AMPage:vchlistBank code :usbankVoucherDateVendorInvoicePO #Description/AccountAmount(Continued)Total :150.0023356210/11/2018076620 076620 LUNSTRUM, KIRSTEN23356310/11/2018064478 LYON, ELIZABETH WOTS PRESENTATION WOTS PRESENTATION SERVICESWOTS PRESENTATION SERVICES117.100.64.573.20.41.00 1,040.00Total :1,040.0023356410/11/2018072886 MACDONALD-MILLER FAC.SOLUTIONS SVC141433YOST POOL BOILER REPAIRYOST POOL BOILER REPAIR001.000.64.576.80.48.00 2,845.0010.3% Sales Tax001.000.64.576.80.48.00 293.04Total :3,138.0423356510/11/2018019582 MANOR HARDWARE 915079-00FAC MAINT & PARKS - LASER SELF LEVELFac Maint & Parks - Laser Self Level001.000.66.518.30.35.00 387.50Fac Maint & Parks - Laser Self Level001.000.64.576.80.35.00 387.5010.4% Sales Tax001.000.66.518.30.35.00 40.3010.4% Sales Tax001.000.64.576.80.35.00 40.30Total :855.6023356610/11/2018064477 MARSHALL, GARY WOTS PRESENTATION WOTS PRESENTATIONWOTS PRESENTATION117.100.64.573.20.41.00 150.00Total :150.0023356710/11/2018076626 MCCANN TRUCKING AND EXCAVATING E6GC.Ret ReleaseE6GC.RETAINAGE RELEASE - BOND IN PLACE IE6GC.Retainage Release - Bond in Place423.000.223.400 39,570.87Total :39,570.8723356810/11/2018075746 MCMURRAY, LAURA 6905 FELDENKRAIS 6905 FELDENKRAIS INSTRUCTOR6905 FELDENKRAIS INSTRUCTOR21Page:4.2.aPacket Pg. 28Attachment: claims 10-11-18 (Approval of claim checks.) 10/11/2018Voucher ListCity of Edmonds2210:22:44AMPage:vchlistBank code :usbankVoucherDateVendorInvoicePO #Description/AccountAmount23356810/11/2018(Continued)075746 MCMURRAY, LAURA001.000.64.571.27.41.00 195.00Total :195.0023356910/11/2018076627 MEYERS, SUSAN VIRGINIA WOTS PRESENTATION WOTS PRESENTATIONWOTS PRESENTATION117.100.64.573.20.41.00 625.00Total :625.0023357010/11/2018069053 MICRO COM SYSTEMS LTD 17210LARGE FORMAT SCANNINGLarge Format Scanning001.000.62.524.10.41.00 21,120.81Total :21,120.8123357110/11/2018075596 MOE, LAURA WOTS PRESENTATION WOTS PRESENTATIONWOTS PRESENTATION117.100.64.573.20.41.00 150.00Total :150.0023357210/11/2018076803 MORRIS, ELIZABETH READ WOTS AWARDWOTS AWARD SECOND PLACE NONFICTIONWOTS AWARD SECOND PLACE NONFICTION117.100.64.573.20.41.00 75.00Total :75.0023357310/11/2018064570 NATIONAL SAFETY INC 0519229-INSTORM - EAR PLUGSStorm - Ear Plugs422.000.72.531.90.24.00 266.0010.3% Sales Tax422.000.72.531.90.24.00 27.40Total :293.4023357410/11/2018074866 NORTHWEST PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENTEA10082018 WATERFRONT BENCHES50% DEPOSIT FOR 11 WATERFRONT BENCHES127.000.64.575.50.31.00 11,157.5010.3% Sales Tax127.000.64.575.50.31.00 1,149.2222Page:4.2.aPacket Pg. 29Attachment: claims 10-11-18 (Approval of claim checks.) 10/11/2018Voucher ListCity of Edmonds2310:22:44AMPage:vchlistBank code :usbankVoucherDateVendorInvoicePO #Description/AccountAmount(Continued)Total :12,306.7223357410/11/2018074866074866 NORTHWEST PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT23357510/11/2018025690 NOYES, KARIN 000 00 859ADB MINUTESABD Minutes001.000.62.524.10.41.00 270.00Total :270.0023357610/11/2018068570 O'CONNELL III, NICHOLAS WOTS PRESENTATION WOTS PRESENTATION SERVICESWOTS PRESENTATION SERVICES117.100.64.573.20.41.00 150.00Total :150.0023357710/11/2018065720 OFFICE DEPOT 210369489001 PW - SUPPLIESPW - Supplies001.000.65.518.20.31.00 22.2410.3% Sales Tax001.000.65.518.20.31.00 2.29PW - SUPPLIES210372806001PW - Supplies001.000.65.518.20.31.00 23.0910.3% Sales Tax001.000.65.518.20.31.00 2.38PW - SUPPLIES210373387001PW - Supplies001.000.65.518.20.31.00 4.6910.3% Sales Tax001.000.65.518.20.31.00 0.48PW - OFFICE SUPPLIES210602168001PW - Office Supplies001.000.65.518.20.31.00 69.7910.3% Sales Tax001.000.65.518.20.31.00 7.20Total :132.1623357810/11/2018074545 OLDS-OLYMPIC INC 000511-1827301 FLEET FUELFleet Fuel23Page:4.2.aPacket Pg. 30Attachment: claims 10-11-18 (Approval of claim checks.) 10/11/2018Voucher ListCity of Edmonds2410:22:44AMPage:vchlistBank code :usbankVoucherDateVendorInvoicePO #Description/AccountAmount23357810/11/2018(Continued)074545 OLDS-OLYMPIC INC511.000.77.548.68.34.11 59.32Total :59.3223357910/11/2018026200 OLYMPIC VIEW WATER DISTRICT 0054671HICKMAN PARK IRRIGATIONHICKMAN PARK IRRIGATION001.000.64.576.80.47.00 3,502.46HICKMAN PARK DRINKING FOUNTAIN & SPRINKL0060860HICKMAN PARK DRINKING FOUNTAIN &001.000.64.576.80.47.00 127.71Total :3,630.1723358010/11/2018072739 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 3685-370060 UNIT 19 - AIR FILTERSUnit 19 - Air Filters511.000.77.548.68.31.10 57.0610.3% Sales Tax511.000.77.548.68.31.10 5.88Total :62.9423358110/11/2018073871 PERSONNEL EVALUATION INC 29442INV 29442 - EDMONDS PDWEB-BASED PEP TEST001.000.41.521.10.41.00 100.00Total :100.0023358210/11/2018062657 REGIONAL DISPOSAL COMPANY 0000052024STORM STREET SWEEPING DUMP FEESStorm Street Sweeping Dump Fees422.000.72.531.10.49.00 3,566.70Total :3,566.7023358310/11/2018031500 REID MIDDLETON & ASSOC INC 1809055E6FA.SERVICES THRU 9/21/18E6FA.Services thru 9/21/18422.000.72.594.31.65.41 3,128.75Total :3,128.7523358410/11/2018069103 ROGERS, MAUREEN WOTS AWARDWOTS AWARD SECOND PLACE FICTIONWOTS AWARD SECOND PLACE FICTION117.100.64.573.20.41.00 75.0024Page:4.2.aPacket Pg. 31Attachment: claims 10-11-18 (Approval of claim checks.) 10/11/2018Voucher ListCity of Edmonds2510:22:44AMPage:vchlistBank code :usbankVoucherDateVendorInvoicePO #Description/AccountAmount(Continued)Total :75.0023358410/11/2018069103 069103 ROGERS, MAUREEN23358510/11/2018075742 ROSE, LAURIE 10/08/2018CLAIM FOR EXPENSESREIMBURSE EXPENSES INCURRED FOR THE117.100.64.573.20.31.00 139.41Total :139.4123358610/11/2018076800 ROTHFUS, DEBRA Rothfus, DebraREIMBURSE EXPENSES FOR NOTARYReimburse for Misc Notary Expenses001.000.62.524.10.49.00 310.00Total :310.0023358710/11/2018076328 SCJ ALLIANCE 54710E6AA.SERVICES THRU 8/24/18E6AA.Services thru 8/24/18112.000.68.595.33.65.41 6,345.66Total :6,345.6623358810/11/2018076017 SEATTLE HISTORIC WINDOW CO 417LIBRARY - WINDOWS RESTORATIONLibrary - Windows Restoration001.000.66.518.30.48.00 972.5010.3% Sales Tax001.000.66.518.30.48.00 100.17Total :1,072.6723358910/11/2018074997 SEITEL SYSTEMS, LLC 46080REMOTE COMPUTER SUPPORTRemote computer support - 9/11/18512.000.31.518.88.41.00 660.00Total :660.0023359010/11/2018065194 SEWER EQUIPMENT CO OF AMERICA 0000167909UNIT 98 - FANUnit 98 - Fan511.000.77.548.68.31.10 444.73Freight511.000.77.548.68.31.10 40.5810.3% Sales Tax511.000.77.548.68.31.10 49.9925Page:4.2.aPacket Pg. 32Attachment: claims 10-11-18 (Approval of claim checks.) 10/11/2018Voucher ListCity of Edmonds2610:22:44AMPage:vchlistBank code :usbankVoucherDateVendorInvoicePO #Description/AccountAmount(Continued)Total :535.3023359010/11/2018065194065194 SEWER EQUIPMENT CO OF AMERICA23359110/11/2018063306 SHERWIN-WILLIAMS 3203-9PM: PAINT SUPPLIES - SEAVIEWPM: PAINT SUPPLIES - SEAVIEW001.000.64.576.80.31.00 36.9810.3% Sales Tax001.000.64.576.80.31.00 3.81Total :40.7923359210/11/2018036950 SIX ROBBLEES INC 14-375245UNIT 72 - JACKUnit 72 - Jack511.000.77.548.68.31.10 76.3410.3% Sales Tax511.000.77.548.68.31.10 7.86Total :84.2023359310/11/2018036955 SKY NURSERY T-1241376PM: SUPPLIES STRAW BALESPM: SUPPLIES STRAW BALES001.000.64.576.80.31.00 51.9610.0% Sales Tax001.000.64.576.80.31.00 5.20Total :57.1623359410/11/2018075590 SMARSH INV0041070009-18 NETGUARD MONTHLY SERVICENetGuard Monthly Service Building001.000.62.524.20.42.00 39.00NetGuard Monthly Service City Clerk001.000.25.514.30.42.00 6.50NetGuard Monthly Service Community001.000.61.557.20.42.00 6.50NetGuard Monthly Service Court001.000.23.512.50.42.00 6.50NetGuard Monthly Service Development001.000.62.524.10.42.00 13.00NetGuard Monthly Service Engineering001.000.67.518.21.42.00 97.5026Page:4.2.aPacket Pg. 33Attachment: claims 10-11-18 (Approval of claim checks.) 10/11/2018Voucher ListCity of Edmonds2710:22:44AMPage:vchlistBank code :usbankVoucherDateVendorInvoicePO #Description/AccountAmount23359410/11/2018(Continued)075590 SMARSHNetGuard Monthly Service Facilities001.000.66.518.30.42.00 52.00NetGuard Monthly Service Finance001.000.31.514.23.42.00 6.50NetGuard Monthly Service Human Resources001.000.22.518.10.42.00 6.50NetGuard Monthly Service Information512.000.31.518.88.42.00 19.50NetGuard Monthly Service Mayor's Office001.000.21.513.10.42.00 6.50NetGuard Monthly Service Parks001.000.64.571.21.42.00 6.50NetGuard Monthly Service Parks001.000.64.576.80.42.00 13.00NetGuard Monthly Service Police001.000.41.521.22.42.00 286.00NetGuard Monthly Service PW Water421.000.74.534.80.42.00 39.00NetGuard Monthly Service PW Water/Sewer421.000.74.534.80.42.00 3.25NetGuard Monthly Service PW Water/Sewer423.000.75.535.80.42.00 3.25NetGuard Monthly Service PW Sewer423.000.75.535.80.42.00 32.50NetGuard Monthly Service PW Storm422.000.72.531.90.42.00 6.50NetGuard Monthly Service PW Street111.000.68.542.90.42.00 19.50NetGuard Monthly Service PW Fleet511.000.77.548.68.42.00 6.50NetGuard Monthly Service PW Admin001.000.65.518.20.42.00 2.28NetGuard Monthly Service PW Admin421.000.74.534.80.42.00 0.6527Page:4.2.aPacket Pg. 34Attachment: claims 10-11-18 (Approval of claim checks.) 10/11/2018Voucher ListCity of Edmonds2810:22:44AMPage:vchlistBank code :usbankVoucherDateVendorInvoicePO #Description/AccountAmount23359410/11/2018(Continued)075590 SMARSHNetGuard Monthly Service PW Admin422.000.72.531.90.42.00 2.28NetGuard Monthly Service PW Admin423.000.75.535.80.42.00 0.65NetGuard Monthly Service PW Admin423.000.76.535.80.42.00 0.64NetGuard Monthly Service PW Street/Storm111.000.68.542.90.42.00 6.50NetGuard Monthly Service PW Street/Storm422.000.72.531.90.42.00 6.50NetGuard Monthly Service WWTP423.000.76.535.80.42.00 78.00NetGuard Monthly Service Parks -001.000.64.571.21.42.00 6.50Total :780.0023359510/11/2018073690 SMILEY-FAIRBANKS, MONA 10/04/2018ARTIST SERVICES - COBBLED HOME TEMP ARTWARTIST SERVICES - COBBLED HOME TEMP117.100.64.573.20.41.00 500.00Total :500.0023359610/11/2018066748 SNO CO DEPT OF INFO SERVICES I0004798502018 FIBER NETWORK HOSTING SERVICES2017 Fiber Network Hosting Services512.000.31.518.87.42.00 600.00Total :600.0023359710/11/2018037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 2003-2646-0HUMMINGBIRD PARK 1000 EDMONDS ST / METERHUMMINGBIRD PARK 1000 EDMONDS ST /001.000.64.576.80.47.00 19.46ANWAY PARK 131 SUNSET AVE / METER 1000252006-6395-3ANWAY PARK 131 SUNSET AVE / METER001.000.64.576.80.47.00 121.79BRACKETT'S LANDING NORTH 50 RAILROAD AVE2010-5432-7BRACKETT'S LANDING NORTH 50 RAILROAD001.000.64.576.80.47.00 43.5028Page:4.2.aPacket Pg. 35Attachment: claims 10-11-18 (Approval of claim checks.) 10/11/2018Voucher ListCity of Edmonds2910:22:44AMPage:vchlistBank code :usbankVoucherDateVendorInvoicePO #Description/AccountAmount23359710/11/2018(Continued)037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1CEMETERY BUILDING2015-5730-3CEMETERY BUILDING130.000.64.536.50.47.00 62.85BRACKETT'S LANDING SOUTH 100 RAILROAD AV2021-3965-5BRACKETT'S LANDING SOUTH 100 RAILROAD001.000.64.576.80.47.00 24.35CEMETERY WELL PUMP2021-6153-5CEMETERY WELL PUMP130.000.64.536.50.47.00 111.149TH/CASPER LANDSCAPE BED / METER 10004452022-5063-59TH/CASPER LANDSCAPE BED / METER001.000.64.576.80.47.00 19.46Total :402.5523359810/11/2018038300 SOUND DISPOSAL CO 103587PARKS MAINT GARBAGE AND RECYCLINGPARKS MAINT GARBAGE AND RECYCLING001.000.64.576.80.47.00 1,199.51Total :1,199.5123359910/11/2018076811 STANLEY, MARCUS STANLEY EX CL 9/18STANLEY EXPENSE CLAIM - SWAT TRAINING -PER DIEM SWAT TRAIN. 9/23-9/29/18001.000.41.521.40.43.00 323.25Total :323.2523360010/11/2018076324 SUPERION LLC 216039PROF SVCS - TRAKITProfessional Svcs - Trakit001.000.62.524.10.41.00 240.00Total :240.0023360110/11/2018075938 SUTTER HOME & HEARTH BLD20181239REFUND: EXISTING REMODEL PERMIT ALREADYREFUND: EXISTING REMODEL PERMIT ALREADY001.000.257.620 64.00Total :64.0023360210/11/2018040917 TACOMA SCREW PRODUCTS INC 18216825FLEET SHOP SUPPLIESFleet Shop Supplies29Page:4.2.aPacket Pg. 36Attachment: claims 10-11-18 (Approval of claim checks.) 10/11/2018Voucher ListCity of Edmonds3010:22:44AMPage:vchlistBank code :usbankVoucherDateVendorInvoicePO #Description/AccountAmount23360210/11/2018(Continued)040917 TACOMA SCREW PRODUCTS INC511.000.77.548.68.31.20 22.2010.3% Sales Tax511.000.77.548.68.31.20 2.29TRAFFIC SUPPLIES18216826Traffic Supplies111.000.68.542.64.31.00 30.5410.3% Sales Tax111.000.68.542.64.31.00 3.15Total :58.1823360310/11/2018074965 THAYER, JAMES WOTS PRESENTATION WOTS PRESENTATIONWOTS PRESENTATION117.100.64.573.20.41.00 150.00Total :150.0023360410/11/2018075139 THE LOUIS BERGER GROUP INC 188920E4FE.SERVICES THRU 9/28/18E4FE.Services thru 9/28/18422.000.72.594.31.65.41 3,355.63Total :3,355.6323360510/11/2018072649 THE WIDE FORMAT COMPANY 111126MAINTENANCE FOR HP PAGEWIDE LX4000Oct-18 Maintenance on HP Pagewide512.000.31.518.88.48.00 208.39Total :208.3923360610/11/2018076797 THE WRITERS CONNECTION WOTS PRESENTATION WOTS PRESENTATIONWOTS PRESENTATION117.100.64.573.20.41.00 220.00Total :220.0023360710/11/2018072469 THOMAS, KIM WOTSWOTS SITE OPERATION ASSISTANCEWOTS SITE OPERATION ASSISTANCE117.100.64.573.20.41.00 560.00Total :560.0023360810/11/2018076812 THOMPSON, CAROLINE THOMPSON EX CL 10/18THOMPSON EXPENSE CLAIM - YAMANE CERTIFIC30Page:4.2.aPacket Pg. 37Attachment: claims 10-11-18 (Approval of claim checks.) 10/11/2018Voucher ListCity of Edmonds3110:22:44AMPage:vchlistBank code :usbankVoucherDateVendorInvoicePO #Description/AccountAmount23360810/11/2018(Continued)076812 THOMPSON, CAROLINEREIMBURSE - YAMANE PROMO CERT FRAMING001.000.41.521.10.31.00 176.93Total :176.9323360910/11/2018074123 TRAHAN, ROBERTA NEL WOTS PRESENTATION WOTS PRESENTATIONWOTS PRESENTATION117.100.64.573.20.41.00 225.00Total :225.0023361010/11/2018067904 TRENCHLESS RESOURCES INTL INC 100918PACP TRAINING FOR S MATTHEWSPACP Training for S Matthews423.000.75.535.80.49.00 810.00Total :810.0023361110/11/2018075506 US BANK 5069783EDMLTGOREF12City of Edmonds Limited General001.000.39.592.18.89.00 218.04City of Edmonds Limited General126.000.39.592.75.89.00 76.59City of Edmonds Limited General423.100.76.592.39.89.00 5.37EDMWATREF115069785City of Edmonds Water and Sewer421.000.74.592.34.89.00 180.00City of Edmonds Water and Sewer422.000.72.592.31.89.00 87.00City of Edmonds Water and Sewer423.000.75.592.35.89.00 27.00City of Edmonds Water and Sewer423.100.76.592.39.89.00 6.00EDMWATSEW135069786City of Edmonds Water and Sewer Revenue421.000.74.592.34.89.00 105.00City of Edmonds Water and Sewer Revenue422.000.72.592.31.89.00 18.0031Page:4.2.aPacket Pg. 38Attachment: claims 10-11-18 (Approval of claim checks.) 10/11/2018Voucher ListCity of Edmonds3210:22:44AMPage:vchlistBank code :usbankVoucherDateVendorInvoicePO #Description/AccountAmount23361110/11/2018(Continued)075506 US BANKCity of Edmonds Water and Sewer Revenue423.000.75.592.35.89.00 177.00EDMWATSEW155069787City of Edmonds WA Water and Sewer421.000.74.592.34.89.00 90.00City of Edmonds WA Water and Sewer422.000.72.592.31.89.00 60.00City of Edmonds WA Water and Sewer423.000.75.592.35.89.00 150.00Total :1,200.0023361210/11/2018044960 UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOC CTR 8090151UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOCATION CENTERUTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOCATION CENTER421.000.74.534.80.41.00 125.16UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOCATION CENTER422.000.72.531.90.41.00 125.16UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOCATION CENTER423.000.75.535.80.41.00 128.94Total :379.2623361310/11/2018068259 WA ST CRIMINAL JUSTICE 201131061INV 201131061 FIREARMS RIFLE INSTRUCTORCLARK - FIREARMS RIFLE INST 2014-2001.000.41.521.40.49.00 500.00SPEER - FIREARMS RIFLE INST 2014-2001.000.41.521.40.49.00 500.00INV 201131093 ADV. COLL INVEST - SAUNDER201131093SAUNDERS - ADV COLL INV 0202-01001.000.41.521.40.49.00 100.00SWARTZ - ADV COLL INV 0202-01001.000.41.521.40.49.00 100.00Total :1,200.0023361410/11/2018075155 WALKER MACY LLC P3282.04-5CIVIC LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE PERIODCIVIC LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE PERIOD125.000.64.594.76.65.41 50,924.6132Page:4.2.aPacket Pg. 39Attachment: claims 10-11-18 (Approval of claim checks.) 10/11/2018Voucher ListCity of Edmonds3310:22:44AMPage:vchlistBank code :usbankVoucherDateVendorInvoicePO #Description/AccountAmount(Continued)Total :50,924.6123361410/11/2018075155 075155 WALKER MACY LLC23361510/11/2018071424 WASHINGTON ENERGY SERVICES BLD20181243REFUND: PERMIT CANCELLED BY APPLICANTRefund: permit cancelled by applicant001.000.257.620 41.60Total :41.6023361610/11/2018065035 WASHINGTON STATE PATROL I19002186INV#I1900286 - ID#EDM301 - EDMONDS PD -BACKROUND CHECKS - SEPTEMBER 2018001.000.237.100 188.00Total :188.0023361710/11/2018067195 WASHINGTON TREE EXPERTS I18-647TREE REMOVAL - SEAVIEW PARKTREE REMOVAL - SEAVIEW PARK001.000.64.576.80.48.00 875.0010.3% Sales Tax001.000.64.576.80.48.00 90.13TREE MAINTENANCE - HUMMINGBIRD PARKI18-648TREE MAINTENANCE - HUMMINGBIRD PARK001.000.64.576.80.48.00 750.0010.3% Sales Tax001.000.64.576.80.48.00 77.25Total :1,792.3823361810/11/2018074609 WEST COAST ARMORY NORTH 1373972INV#1373972 CUST ID EDMONDS PD - SEPT 20BAY RENTAL 9/19/2018 3 @ $55.00001.000.41.521.40.41.00 165.00RANGE USAGE:~001.000.41.521.40.41.00 176.8010.3% Sales Tax001.000.41.521.40.41.00 18.20Total :360.0023361910/11/2018072627 WEST SAFETY SERVICES INC 7008468MONTHLY 911 DATABASE MAINTMonthly 911 database maint512.000.31.518.88.48.00 200.0033Page:4.2.aPacket Pg. 40Attachment: claims 10-11-18 (Approval of claim checks.) 10/11/2018Voucher ListCity of Edmonds3410:22:44AMPage:vchlistBank code :usbankVoucherDateVendorInvoicePO #Description/AccountAmount(Continued)Total :200.0023361910/11/2018072627 072627 WEST SAFETY SERVICES INC23362010/11/2018076794 WILLIAMS, CHARLOTTE ANN BLD20181286REFUND: WATERLINE NOT REPAIRED. NO PERMREFUND: WATERLINE NOT REPAIRED. NO001.000.257.620 121.60Total :121.6023362110/11/2018073018 WINFIELD SOLUTIONS LLC 000062737265 PARKS GRASS SEEDPARKS GRASS SEED001.000.64.576.80.31.00 210.0010.3% Sales Tax001.000.64.576.80.31.00 21.63Total :231.6323362210/11/2018072484 WRIGHT, CAROLYNE WOTS PRESENTATION WOTS PRESENTATIONWOTS PRESENTATION117.100.64.573.20.41.00 150.00Total :150.0023362310/11/2018064213 WSSUA TREASURER 580SOFTBALL LEAGUE UMPIRESSOFTBALL LEAGUE UMPIRES001.000.64.571.25.41.00 4,480.00Total :4,480.0023362410/11/2018076813 WWCICC EvensenICC PLUMBING SYSTEMS TRAININGICC Plumbing Systems Training001.000.62.524.20.49.00 85.00Total :85.0023362510/11/2018075122 YAKIMA CO DEPT OF CORR SEPT 2018INMATE HOUSING - EDMONDS PD - SEPT 201830 INMATE HOUSING DAYS 09/18001.000.39.523.60.51.00 1,795.50Total :1,795.5023362610/11/2018051282 ZUMAR INDUSTRIES INC 24582TRAFFIC - WARNING FLAGS AND HOLDERSTraffic - Warning Flags and Holders111.000.68.542.64.31.00 390.6034Page:4.2.aPacket Pg. 41Attachment: claims 10-11-18 (Approval of claim checks.) 10/11/2018Voucher ListCity of Edmonds3510:22:44AMPage:vchlistBank code :usbankVoucherDateVendorInvoicePO #Description/AccountAmount23362610/11/2018(Continued)051282 ZUMAR INDUSTRIES INCFreight111.000.68.542.64.31.00 14.2110.3% Sales Tax111.000.68.542.64.31.00 41.70PINE ST ROAD IMPROVEMENTS - BLANK SIGNS24612Pine St Road Improvements - Blank Signs112.000.68.542.64.41.00 208.50Freight112.000.68.542.64.41.00 12.8910.3% Sales Tax112.000.68.542.64.41.00 22.819TH & MAIN PROJECT - SIGNS247759th & Main Project - Signs112.000.68.542.64.41.00 503.80Freight112.000.68.542.64.41.00 32.0010.3% Sales Tax112.000.68.542.64.41.00 55.19Total :1,281.70Bank total : 447,303.24155 Vouchers for bank code :usbank447,303.24Total vouchers :Vouchers in this report15535Page:4.2.aPacket Pg. 42Attachment: claims 10-11-18 (Approval of claim checks.) PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title) Funding Project Title Project Accounting Number Engineering Project Number STM 12th Ave & Sierra Stormwater System Improvements c484 E5FE STR 15th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to 8th Ave)c424 E3DC STM 174th St. & 71st Ave Storm Improvements c521 E8FB STM 183rd Pl SW Storm Repairs c491 E6FE SWR 2013 Sanitary Sewer Pipe Rehabilitation c390 E2GB SWR 2013 Sewerline Replacement Project c398 E3GA STR 2014 Chip Seals c451 E4CB STM 2014 Drainage Improvements c433 E4FA STR 2014 Overlay Program c438 E4CA WTR 2014 Waterline Overlays c452 E4CC STM 2015 Citywide Drainage Improvements/Rehab Projects c466 E5FA STR 2015 Overlay Program c463 E5CA SWR 2015 Sewerline Overlays i007 E5CC SWR 2015 Sewerline Replacement Project c441 E4GA STR 2015 Traffic Calming c471 E5AB WTR 2015 Waterline Overlays c475 E5CB WTR 2015 Waterline Replacement Program c440 E4JB STR 2016 Curb Ramp Upgrades i016 E6DC STR 2016 Overlay Program i008 E6CA SWR 2016 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Projects c469 E5GA SWR 2016 Sewerline Overlays i010 E6CC WTR 2016 Water Comp Plan Update c460 E4JC WTR 2016 Waterline Overlays i009 E6CB WTR 2016 Waterline Replacement Projects c468 E5JA STR 2017 Curb Ramp Upgrades i022 E7DA STR 2017 Minor Sidewalk Program i023 E7DB STR 2017 Overlay Program i018 E7CA SWR 2017 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Project i013 E6GA SWR 2017 Sewerline Overlays i020 E7CC STR 2017 Traffic Calming i021 E7AA WTR 2017 Waterline Overlays i019 E7CB WTR 2017 Waterline Replacement Projects i014 E6JB STM 2018 Lorian Woods Study s018 E8FA STR 2018 Minor Sidewalk Project i032 E8DA STR 2018 Overlay Program i030 E8CB SWR 2018 Sewerline Overlays i035 E8CE SWR 2018 Sewerline Replacement Project c492 E6GC STR 2018 Traffic Calming i027 E8AA WTR 2018 Waterline Overlays i034 E8CD WTR 2018 Waterline Replacement Project c493 E6JC STR 2019 Overlay Program i036 E9CA Revised 10/10/2018 4.2.b Packet Pg. 43 Attachment: FrequentlyUsedProjNumbers 10-11-18 (Approval of claim checks.) PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title) Funding Project Title Project Accounting Number Engineering Project Number SWR 2019 Sewerline Replacement Project c516 E8GA STM 2019 Storm Maintenance Project c525 E8FC WTR 2019 Swedish Waterline Replacement c523 E8JA WTR 2019 Waterline Replacement c498 E7JA STR 220th Adaptive i028 E8AB STR 220th Street Overlay Project c462 E4CD STM 224th & 98th Drainage Improvements c486 E6FB WTR 224th Waterline Relocation (2013)c418 E3JB STR 228th St. SW Corridor Improvements i005 E7AC STR 236th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Madrona School)c425 E3DD STR 238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave)c423 E3DB STR 238th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Hwy 99)c485 E6DA STM 3rd Ave Rain Gardens i012 E6FC STR 76th Ave W & 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements i029 E8CA STR 76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements c368 E1CA STR 84th Ave W Overlay from 220th to 212th i031 E8CC STR 89th Pl W Retaining Wall i025 E7CD STR 9th Avenue Improvement Project c392 E2AB FAC A/V Upgrades - Council Chambers c476 E5LA STR ADA Curb Ramp Upgrades along 3rd Ave S c426 E3DE STR ADA Curb Ramps i033 E8DB STR ADA Transition Plan s016 E6DB STR Audible Pedestrian Signals i024 E7AB STR Bikelink Project c474 E5DA PRK City Spray Park c417 E4MA SWR Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase I c456 E4GB SWR Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase II c488 E6GB STR Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements i026 E7DC STR Citywide Protected/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion i015 E6AB WTR Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave)c482 E5JB STM Dayton Street & SR104 Storm Drainage Alternatives c374 E1FM PM Dayton Street Plaza c276 E7MA STM Dayton Street Storm Improvements (6th Ave - 8th Ave)c472 E5FC STM Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station c455 E4FE FAC Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab c443 E4MB STM Edmonds Marsh Feasibility Study c380 E2FC General Edmonds Waterfront Access Analysis c478 E5DB FAC ESCO III Project c419 E3LB PRK FAC Band Shell Replacement c477 E6MB WTR Five Corners Reservoir Re-coating c473 E5KA STR Five Corners Roundabout (212th Street SW @ 84th Avenue W)c342 E1AA Revised 10/10/2018 4.2.b Packet Pg. 44 Attachment: FrequentlyUsedProjNumbers 10-11-18 (Approval of claim checks.) PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title) Funding Project Title Project Accounting Number Engineering Project Number PM Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor c282 E8MA STR Hwy 99 Enhancements (Phase III)c405 E2AD STR Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization s014 E6AA STM Lake Ballinger Associated Projects c436 E4FD SWR Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study s011 E5GB STM LID Retrofits Perrinville Creek Basin c434 E4FB SWR Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study c461 E4GC STR Minor Sidewalk Program i017 E6DD STM North Talbot Road Drainage Improvements c378 E2FA STM Northstream Culvert Repair Under Puget Drive i011 E6FA STM Northstream Pipe Abandonment on Puget Drive c410 E3FE STM NPDES (Students Saving Salmon)m013 E7FG STM OVD Slope Repair & Stabilization m105 E7FA STM Perrinville Creek Culvert Replacement c376 E1FN STM Perrinville Creek Stormwater Flow Reduction Retrofit Study c408 E3FC FAC Public Safety Controls System Upgrades c444 E4LA STM Seaview Park Infiltration Facility c479 E5FD WWTP Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring c446 E4HA STR SR104 Corridor Transportation Study c427 E3AB STR SR104/City Park Mid-Block Crossing c454 E4DB UTILITIES Standard Details Updates s010 E5NA STM Storm Drain Improvements @ 9510 232nd St. SW c495 E7FB STM Storm Drainage Improvements - 88th & 194th c429 E3FG STM Stormwater Comp Plan Update s017 E6FD STR Sunset Walkway Improvements c354 E1DA STM SW Edmonds Basin #3-238th St. SW to Hickman Park Infiltration System c379 E2FB STM SW Edmonds-105th/106th Ave W Storm Improvements c430 E3FH STR Trackside Warning System c470 E5AA STR Train Trench - Concept c453 E4DA STR Transportation Plan Update c391 E2AA STM Update Stormwater Management Code & Associated Projects c467 E5FB UTILITIES Utility Rate Update s013 E6JA PRK Veteran's Plaza c480 E6MA STM Video Assessment of Stormwater Lines c459 E4FF PRK Waterfront Restoration m103 E7MA STM Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration c435 E4FC WWTP WWTP Outfall Pipe Modifications c481 E5HA PRK Yost Park Spa c494 E6MC Revised 10/10/2018 4.2.b Packet Pg. 45 Attachment: FrequentlyUsedProjNumbers 10-11-18 (Approval of claim checks.) PROJECT NUMBERS (By Engineering Number) Funding Engineering Project Number Project Accounting Number Project Title STR E1AA c342 Five Corners Roundabout (212th Street SW @ 84th Avenue W) STR E1CA c368 76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements STR E1DA c354 Sunset Walkway Improvements STM E1FM c374 Dayton Street & SR104 Storm Drainage Alternatives STM E1FN c376 Perrinville Creek Culvert Replacement STR E2AA c391 Transportation Plan Update STR E2AB c392 9th Avenue Improvement Project STR E2AD c405 Hwy 99 Enhancements (Phase III) STM E2FA c378 North Talbot Road Drainage Improvements STM E2FB c379 SW Edmonds Basin #3-238th St. SW to Hickman Park Infiltration System STM E2FC c380 Edmonds Marsh Feasibility Study SWR E2GB c390 2013 Sanitary Sewer Pipe Rehabilitation STR E3AB c427 SR104 Corridor Transportation Study STR E3DB c423 238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave) STR E3DC c424 15th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to 8th Ave) STR E3DD c425 236th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Madrona School) STR E3DE c426 ADA Curb Ramp Upgrades along 3rd Ave S STM E3FC c408 Perrinville Creek Stormwater Flow Reduction Retrofit Study STM E3FE c410 Northstream Pipe Abandonment on Puget Drive STM E3FG c429 Storm Drainage Improvements - 88th & 194th STM E3FH c430 SW Edmonds-105th/106th Ave W Storm Improvements SWR E3GA c398 2013 Sewerline Replacement Project WTR E3JB c418 224th Waterline Relocation (2013) FAC E3LB c419 ESCO III Project STR E4CA c438 2014 Overlay Program STR E4CB c451 2014 Chip Seals WTR E4CC c452 2014 Waterline Overlays STR E4CD c462 220th Street Overlay Project STR E4DA c453 Train Trench - Concept STR E4DB c454 SR104/City Park Mid-Block Crossing STM E4FA c433 2014 Drainage Improvements STM E4FB c434 LID Retrofits Perrinville Creek Basin STM E4FC c435 Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration STM E4FD c436 Lake Ballinger Associated Projects STM E4FE c455 Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station STM E4FF c459 Video Assessment of Stormwater Lines SWR E4GA c441 2015 Sewerline Replacement Project SWR E4GB c456 Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase I SWR E4GC c461 Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study WWTP E4HA c446 Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring WTR E4JB c440 2015 Waterline Replacement Program Revised 10/10/2018 4.2.b Packet Pg. 46 Attachment: FrequentlyUsedProjNumbers 10-11-18 (Approval of claim checks.) PROJECT NUMBERS (By Engineering Number) Funding Engineering Project Number Project Accounting Number Project Title WTR E4JC c460 2016 Water Comp Plan Update FAC E4LA c444 Public Safety Controls System Upgrades PRK E4MA c417 City Spray Park FAC E4MB c443 Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab STR E5AA c470 Trackside Warning System STR E5AB c471 2015 Traffic Calming STR E5CA c463 2015 Overlay Program WTR E5CB c475 2015 Waterline Overlays SWR E5CC i007 2015 Sewerline Overlays STR E5DA c474 Bikelink Project General E5DB c478 Edmonds Waterfront Access Analysis STM E5FA c466 2015 Citywide Drainage Improvements/Rehab Projects STM E5FB c467 Update Stormwater Management Code & Associated Projects STM E5FC c472 Dayton Street Storm Improvements (6th Ave - 8th Ave) STM E5FD c479 Seaview Park Infiltration Facility STM E5FE c484 12th Ave & Sierra Stormwater System Improvements SWR E5GA c469 2016 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Projects SWR E5GB s011 Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study WWTP E5HA c481 WWTP Outfall Pipe Modifications WTR E5JA c468 2016 Waterline Replacement Projects WTR E5JB c482 Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave) WTR E5KA c473 Five Corners Reservoir Re-coating FAC E5LA c476 A/V Upgrades - Council Chambers UTILITIES E5NA s010 Standard Details Updates STR E6AA s014 Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization STR E6AB i015 Citywide Protected/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion STR E6CA i008 2016 Overlay Program WTR E6CB i009 2016 Waterline Overlays SWR E6CC i010 2016 Sewerline Overlays STR E6DA c485 238th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Hwy 99) STR E6DB s016 ADA Transition Plan STR E6DC i016 2016 Curb Ramp Upgrades STR E6DD i017 Minor Sidewalk Program STM E6FA i011 Northstream Culvert Repair Under Puget Drive STM E6FB c486 224th & 98th Drainage Improvements STM E6FC i012 3rd Ave Rain Gardens STM E6FD s017 Stormwater Comp Plan Update STM E6FE c491 183rd Pl SW Storm Repairs SWR E6GA i013 2017 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Project SWR E6GB c488 Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase II SWR E6GC c492 2018 Sewerline Replacement Project Revised 10/10/2018 4.2.b Packet Pg. 47 Attachment: FrequentlyUsedProjNumbers 10-11-18 (Approval of claim checks.) PROJECT NUMBERS (By Engineering Number) Funding Engineering Project Number Project Accounting Number Project Title UTILITIES E6JA s013 Utility Rate Update WTR E6JB i014 2017 Waterline Replacement Projects WTR E6JC c493 2018 Waterline Replacement Project PRK E6MA c480 Veteran's Plaza PRK E6MB c477 FAC Band Shell Replacement PRK E6MC c494 Yost Park Spa STR E7AA i021 2017 Traffic Calming STR E7AB i024 Audible Pedestrian Signals STR E7AC i005 228th St. SW Corridor Improvements STR E7CA i018 2017 Overlay Program WTR E7CB i019 2017 Waterline Overlays SWR E7CC i020 2017 Sewerline Overlays STR E7CD i025 89th Pl W Retaining Wall STR E7DA i022 2017 Curb Ramp Upgrades STR E7DB i023 2017 Minor Sidewalk Program STR E7DC i026 Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements STM E7FA m105 OVD Slope Repair & Stabilization STM E7FB c495 Storm Drain Improvements @ 9510 232nd St. SW STM E7FG m013 NPDES (Students Saving Salmon) WTR E7JA c498 2019 Waterline Replacement PM E7MA c276 Dayton Street Plaza PRK E7MA m103 Waterfront Restoration STR E8AA i027 2018 Traffic Calming STR E8AB i028 220th Adaptive STR E8CA i029 76th Ave W & 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements STR E8CB i030 2018 Overlay Program STR E8CC i031 84th Ave W Overlay from 220th to 212th WTR E8CD i034 2018 Waterline Overlays SWR E8CE i035 2018 Sewerline Overlays STR E8DA i032 2018 Minor Sidewalk Project STR E8DB i033 ADA Curb Ramps STM E8FA s018 2018 Lorian Woods Study STM E8FB c521 174th St. & 71st Ave Storm Improvements STM E8FC c525 2019 Storm Maintenance Project SWR E8GA c516 2019 Sewerline Replacement Project WTR E8JA c523 2019 Swedish Waterline Replacement PM E8MA c282 Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor STR E9CA i036 2019 Overlay Program Revised 10/10/2018 4.2.b Packet Pg. 48 Attachment: FrequentlyUsedProjNumbers 10-11-18 (Approval of claim checks.) PROJECT NUMBERS (By New Project Accounting Number) Funding Engineering Project Number Project Accounting Number Project Title PM E7MA c276 Dayton Street Plaza PM E8MA c282 Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor STR E1AA c342 Five Corners Roundabout (212th Street SW @ 84th Avenue W) STR E1DA c354 Sunset Walkway Improvements STR E1CA c368 76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements STM E1FM c374 Dayton Street & SR104 Storm Drainage Alternatives STM E1FN c376 Perrinville Creek Culvert Replacement STM E2FA c378 North Talbot Road Drainage Improvements STM E2FB c379 SW Edmonds Basin #3-238th St. SW to Hickman Park Infiltration System STM E2FC c380 Edmonds Marsh Feasibility Study SWR E2GB c390 2013 Sanitary Sewer Pipe Rehabilitation STR E2AA c391 Transportation Plan Update STR E2AB c392 9th Avenue Improvement Project SWR E3GA c398 2013 Sewerline Replacement Project STR E2AD c405 Hwy 99 Enhancements (Phase III) STM E3FC c408 Perrinville Creek Stormwater Flow Reduction Retrofit Study STM E3FE c410 Northstream Pipe Abandonment on Puget Drive PRK E4MA c417 City Spray Park WTR E3JB c418 224th Waterline Relocation (2013) FAC E3LB c419 ESCO III Project STR E3DB c423 238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave) STR E3DC c424 15th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to 8th Ave) STR E3DD c425 236th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Madrona School) STR E3DE c426 ADA Curb Ramp Upgrades along 3rd Ave S STR E3AB c427 SR104 Corridor Transportation Study STM E3FG c429 Storm Drainage Improvements - 88th & 194th STM E3FH c430 SW Edmonds-105th/106th Ave W Storm Improvements STM E4FA c433 2014 Drainage Improvements STM E4FB c434 LID Retrofits Perrinville Creek Basin STM E4FC c435 Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration STM E4FD c436 Lake Ballinger Associated Projects STR E4CA c438 2014 Overlay Program WTR E4JB c440 2015 Waterline Replacement Program SWR E4GA c441 2015 Sewerline Replacement Project FAC E4MB c443 Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab FAC E4LA c444 Public Safety Controls System Upgrades WWTP E4HA c446 Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring STR E4CB c451 2014 Chip Seals WTR E4CC c452 2014 Waterline Overlays STR E4DA c453 Train Trench - Concept STR E4DB c454 SR104/City Park Mid-Block Crossing Revised 10/10/2018 4.2.b Packet Pg. 49 Attachment: FrequentlyUsedProjNumbers 10-11-18 (Approval of claim checks.) PROJECT NUMBERS (By New Project Accounting Number) Funding Engineering Project Number Project Accounting Number Project Title STM E4FE c455 Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station SWR E4GB c456 Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase I STM E4FF c459 Video Assessment of Stormwater Lines WTR E4JC c460 2016 Water Comp Plan Update SWR E4GC c461 Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study STR E4CD c462 220th Street Overlay Project STR E5CA c463 2015 Overlay Program STM E5FA c466 2015 Citywide Drainage Improvements/Rehab Projects STM E5FB c467 Update Stormwater Management Code & Associated Projects WTR E5JA c468 2016 Waterline Replacement Projects SWR E5GA c469 2016 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Projects STR E5AA c470 Trackside Warning System STR E5AB c471 2015 Traffic Calming STM E5FC c472 Dayton Street Storm Improvements (6th Ave - 8th Ave) WTR E5KA c473 Five Corners Reservoir Re-coating STR E5DA c474 Bikelink Project WTR E5CB c475 2015 Waterline Overlays FAC E5LA c476 A/V Upgrades - Council Chambers PRK E6MB c477 FAC Band Shell Replacement General E5DB c478 Edmonds Waterfront Access Analysis STM E5FD c479 Seaview Park Infiltration Facility PRK E6MA c480 Veteran's Plaza WWTP E5HA c481 WWTP Outfall Pipe Modifications WTR E5JB c482 Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave) STM E5FE c484 12th Ave & Sierra Stormwater System Improvements STR E6DA c485 238th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Hwy 99) STM E6FB c486 224th & 98th Drainage Improvements SWR E6GB c488 Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase II STM E6FE c491 183rd Pl SW Storm Repairs SWR E6GC c492 2018 Sewerline Replacement Project WTR E6JC c493 2018 Waterline Replacement Project PRK E6MC c494 Yost Park Spa STM E7FB c495 Storm Drain Improvements @ 9510 232nd St. SW WTR E7JA c498 2019 Waterline Replacement SWR E8GA c516 2019 Sewerline Replacement Project STM E8FB c521 174th St. & 71st Ave Storm Improvements WTR E8JA c523 2019 Swedish Waterline Replacement STM E8FC c525 2019 Storm Maintenance Project STR E7AC i005 228th St. SW Corridor Improvements SWR E5CC i007 2015 Sewerline Overlays STR E6CA i008 2016 Overlay Program Revised 10/10/2018 4.2.b Packet Pg. 50 Attachment: FrequentlyUsedProjNumbers 10-11-18 (Approval of claim checks.) PROJECT NUMBERS (By New Project Accounting Number) Funding Engineering Project Number Project Accounting Number Project Title WTR E6CB i009 2016 Waterline Overlays SWR E6CC i010 2016 Sewerline Overlays STM E6FA i011 Northstream Culvert Repair Under Puget Drive STM E6FC i012 3rd Ave Rain Gardens SWR E6GA i013 2017 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Project WTR E6JB i014 2017 Waterline Replacement Projects STR E6AB i015 Citywide Protected/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion STR E6DC i016 2016 Curb Ramp Upgrades STR E6DD i017 Minor Sidewalk Program STR E7CA i018 2017 Overlay Program WTR E7CB i019 2017 Waterline Overlays SWR E7CC i020 2017 Sewerline Overlays STR E7AA i021 2017 Traffic Calming STR E7DA i022 2017 Curb Ramp Upgrades STR E7DB i023 2017 Minor Sidewalk Program STR E7AB i024 Audible Pedestrian Signals STR E7CD i025 89th Pl W Retaining Wall STR E7DC i026 Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements STR E8AA i027 2018 Traffic Calming STR E8AB i028 220th Adaptive STR E8CA i029 76th Ave W & 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements STR E8CB i030 2018 Overlay Program STR E8CC i031 84th Ave W Overlay from 220th to 212th STR E8DA i032 2018 Minor Sidewalk Project STR E8DB i033 ADA Curb Ramps WTR E8CD i034 2018 Waterline Overlays SWR E8CE i035 2018 Sewerline Overlays STR E9CA i036 2019 Overlay Program STM E7FG m013 NPDES (Students Saving Salmon) PRK E7MA m103 Waterfront Restoration STM E7FA m105 OVD Slope Repair & Stabilization UTILITIES E5NA s010 Standard Details Updates SWR E5GB s011 Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study UTILITIES E6JA s013 Utility Rate Update STR E6AA s014 Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization STR E6DB s016 ADA Transition Plan STM E6FD s017 Stormwater Comp Plan Update STM E8FA s018 2018 Lorian Woods Study Revised 10/10/2018 4.2.b Packet Pg. 51 Attachment: FrequentlyUsedProjNumbers 10-11-18 (Approval of claim checks.) PROJECT NUMBERS (By Funding) Funding Project Title Project Accounting Number Engineering Project Number FAC A/V Upgrades - Council Chambers c476 E5LA FAC Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab c443 E4MB FAC ESCO III Project c419 E3LB FAC Public Safety Controls System Upgrades c444 E4LA General Edmonds Waterfront Access Analysis c478 E5DB PM Dayton Street Plaza c276 E7MA PM Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor c282 E8MA PRK City Spray Park c417 E4MA PRK FAC Band Shell Replacement c477 E6MB PRK Veteran's Plaza c480 E6MA PRK Waterfront Restoration m103 E7MA PRK Yost Park Spa c494 E6MC STM 12th Ave & Sierra Stormwater System Improvements c484 E5FE STM 174th St. & 71st Ave Storm Improvements c521 E8FB STM 183rd Pl SW Storm Repairs c491 E6FE STM 2014 Drainage Improvements c433 E4FA STM 2015 Citywide Drainage Improvements/Rehab Projects c466 E5FA STM 2018 Lorian Woods Study s018 E8FA STM 2019 Storm Maintenance Project c525 E8FC STM 224th & 98th Drainage Improvements c486 E6FB STM 3rd Ave Rain Gardens i012 E6FC STM Dayton Street & SR104 Storm Drainage Alternatives c374 E1FM STM Dayton Street Storm Improvements (6th Ave - 8th Ave)c472 E5FC STM Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station c455 E4FE STM Edmonds Marsh Feasibility Study c380 E2FC STM Lake Ballinger Associated Projects c436 E4FD STM LID Retrofits Perrinville Creek Basin c434 E4FB STM North Talbot Road Drainage Improvements c378 E2FA STM Northstream Culvert Repair Under Puget Drive i011 E6FA STM Northstream Pipe Abandonment on Puget Drive c410 E3FE STM NPDES (Students Saving Salmon)m013 E7FG STM OVD Slope Repair & Stabilization m105 E7FA STM Perrinville Creek Culvert Replacement c376 E1FN STM Perrinville Creek Stormwater Flow Reduction Retrofit Study c408 E3FC STM Seaview Park Infiltration Facility c479 E5FD STM Storm Drain Improvements @ 9510 232nd St. SW c495 E7FB STM Storm Drainage Improvements - 88th & 194th c429 E3FG STM Stormwater Comp Plan Update s017 E6FD STM SW Edmonds Basin #3-238th St. SW to Hickman Park Infiltration System c379 E2FB STM SW Edmonds-105th/106th Ave W Storm Improvements c430 E3FH Revised 10/10/2018 4.2.b Packet Pg. 52 Attachment: FrequentlyUsedProjNumbers 10-11-18 (Approval of claim checks.) PROJECT NUMBERS (By Funding) Funding Project Title Project Accounting Number Engineering Project Number STM Update Stormwater Management Code & Associated Projects c467 E5FB STM Video Assessment of Stormwater Lines c459 E4FF STM Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration c435 E4FC STR 15th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to 8th Ave)c424 E3DC STR 2014 Chip Seals c451 E4CB STR 2014 Overlay Program c438 E4CA STR 2015 Overlay Program c463 E5CA STR 2015 Traffic Calming c471 E5AB STR 2016 Curb Ramp Upgrades i016 E6DC STR 2016 Overlay Program i008 E6CA STR 2017 Curb Ramp Upgrades i022 E7DA STR 2017 Minor Sidewalk Program i023 E7DB STR 2017 Overlay Program i018 E7CA STR 2017 Traffic Calming i021 E7AA STR 2018 Minor Sidewalk Project i032 E8DA STR 2018 Overlay Program i030 E8CB STR 2018 Traffic Calming i027 E8AA STR 2019 Overlay Program i036 E9CA STR 220th Street Overlay Project c462 E4CD STR 228th St. SW Corridor Improvements i005 E7AC STR 236th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Madrona School)c425 E3DD STR 238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave)c423 E3DB STR 238th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Hwy 99)c485 E6DA STR 76th Ave W & 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements i029 E8CA STR 76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements c368 E1CA STR 84th Ave W Overlay from 220th to 212th i031 E8CC STR 89th Pl W Retaining Wall i025 E7CD STR 9th Avenue Improvement Project c392 E2AB STR ADA Curb Ramp Upgrades along 3rd Ave S c426 E3DE STR ADA Curb Ramps i033 E8DB STR ADA Transition Plan s016 E6DB STR Audible Pedestrian Signals i024 E7AB STR Bikelink Project c474 E5DA STR Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements i026 E7DC STR Citywide Protected/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion i015 E6AB STR Five Corners Roundabout (212th Street SW @ 84th Avenue W)c342 E1AA STR Hwy 99 Enhancements (Phase III)c405 E2AD STR Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization s014 E6AA STR Minor Sidewalk Program i017 E6DD STR SR104 Corridor Transportation Study c427 E3AB STR SR104/City Park Mid-Block Crossing c454 E4DB Revised 10/10/2018 4.2.b Packet Pg. 53 Attachment: FrequentlyUsedProjNumbers 10-11-18 (Approval of claim checks.) PROJECT NUMBERS (By Funding) Funding Project Title Project Accounting Number Engineering Project Number STR Sunset Walkway Improvements c354 E1DA STR Trackside Warning System c470 E5AA STR Train Trench - Concept c453 E4DA STR Transportation Plan Update c391 E2AA STR 220th Adaptive i028 E8AB SWR 2013 Sanitary Sewer Pipe Rehabilitation c390 E2GB SWR 2013 Sewerline Replacement Project c398 E3GA SWR 2015 Sewerline Overlays i007 E5CC SWR 2015 Sewerline Replacement Project c441 E4GA SWR 2016 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Projects c469 E5GA SWR 2016 Sewerline Overlays i010 E6CC SWR 2017 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Project i013 E6GA SWR 2017 Sewerline Overlays i020 E7CC SWR 2018 Sewerline Overlays i035 E8CE SWR 2018 Sewerline Replacement Project c492 E6GC SWR 2019 Sewerline Replacement Project c516 E8GA SWR Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase I c456 E4GB SWR Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase II c488 E6GB SWR Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study s011 E5GB SWR Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study c461 E4GC UTILITIES Standard Details Updates s010 E5NA UTILITIES Utility Rate Update s013 E6JA WTR 2014 Waterline Overlays c452 E4CC WTR 2015 Waterline Overlays c475 E5CB WTR 2015 Waterline Replacement Program c440 E4JB WTR 2016 Water Comp Plan Update c460 E4JC WTR 2016 Waterline Overlays i009 E6CB WTR 2016 Waterline Replacement Projects c468 E5JA WTR 2017 Waterline Overlays i019 E7CB WTR 2017 Waterline Replacement Projects i014 E6JB WTR 2018 Waterline Overlays i034 E8CD WTR 2018 Waterline Replacement Project c493 E6JC WTR 2019 Swedish Waterline Replacement c523 E8JA WTR 2019 Waterline Replacement c498 E7JA WTR 224th Waterline Relocation (2013)c418 E3JB WTR Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave)c482 E5JB WTR Five Corners Reservoir Re-coating c473 E5KA WWTP Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring c446 E4HA WWTP WWTP Outfall Pipe Modifications c481 E5HA Revised 10/10/2018 4.2.b Packet Pg. 54 Attachment: FrequentlyUsedProjNumbers 10-11-18 (Approval of claim checks.) City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 10/16/2018 August 2018 Monthly Financial Report Staff Lead: Dave Turley Department: Administrative Services Preparer: Sarah Mager Background/History N/A Staff Recommendation No action needed; informational only Narrative August 2018 Monthly Financial Report Attachments: August 2018 Monthly Financial Report 4.3 Packet Pg. 55 CITY OF EDMONDS MONTHLY BUDGETARY FINANCIAL REPORT AUGUST 2018 4.3.a Packet Pg. 56 Attachment: August 2018 Monthly Financial Report (August 2018 Monthly Financial Report) 1 Page 1 of 1 Fund No.Title 2018 Amended Budget 8/31/2017 Revenues 8/31/2018 Revenues Amount Remaining % Received 001 GENERAL FUND 39,484,055$ 24,441,266$ 26,213,586$ 13,270,469$ 66% 009 LEOFF-MEDICAL INS. RESERVE 285,650 144,272 143,442 142,208 50% 011 RISK MANAGEMENT FUND 19,180 12,810 15,836 3,344 83% 012 CONTINGENCY RESERVE FUND 64,750 53,017 95,191 (30,441) 147% 014 HISTORIC PRESERVATION GIFT FUND 5,170 108 2,645 2,525 51% 016 BUILDING MAINTENANCE - 337,241 - - 0% 017 MARSH RESTORATION & PRESERVATION FUND 300,000 - 306,850 (6,850) 102% 018 EDMONDS HOMELESSNESS RESPONSE FUND 250,000 - 250,000 - 100% 019 EDMONDS OPIOID RESPONSE FUND 250,000 - 250,000 - 100% 104 DRUG ENFORCEMENT FUND 130,560 31,380 58,598 71,962 45% 111 STREET FUND 1,784,270 1,333,598 1,031,832 752,438 58% 112 COMBINED STREET CONST/IMPROVE 3,634,203 2,624,559 3,039,845 594,358 84% 117 MUNICIPAL ARTS ACQUIS. FUND 146,200 33,486 85,460 60,740 58% 118 MEMORIAL STREET TREE 400 256 318 82 80% 120 HOTEL/MOTEL TAX REVENUE FUND 87,960 52,555 53,658 34,302 61% 121 EMPLOYEE PARKING PERMIT FUND 25,640 13,501 13,130 12,510 51% 122 YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP FUND 850 617 428 422 50% 123 TOURISM PROMOTIONAL FUND/ARTS 30,520 18,261 23,946 6,574 78% 125 REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 2 1 1,446,880 1,016,251 1,293,174 153,706 89% 126 REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 1, PARKS ACQ FUND 1 1,448,300 1,018,462 1,301,150 147,150 90% 127 GIFTS CATALOG FUND 53,810 29,021 57,176 (3,366) 106% 129 SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND - 547 - - 0% 130 CEMETERY MAINTENANCE/IMPROVEMT 180,170 150,527 137,690 42,480 76% 136 PARKS TRUST FUND 3,150 2,171 2,735 415 87% 137 CEMETERY MAINTENANCE TRUST FD 33,360 27,249 29,077 4,283 87% 138 SISTER CITY COMMISSION 10,170 7,205 5,162 5,008 51% 140 BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT - 63,381 69,484 (69,484) 0% 211 L.I.D. FUND CONTROL 14,400 - - 14,400 0% 231 2012 LT GO DEBT SERVICE FUND 708,700 64,938 59,284 649,416 8% 332 PARKS CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION FUND 1,621,977 280,446 861,889 760,088 53% 411 COMBINED UTILITY OPERATION - 102,862 94,096 (94,096) 0% 421 WATER UTILITY FUND 2 9,660,690 5,367,002 5,965,019 3,695,671 62% 422 STORM UTILITY FUND 2 5,317,996 3,008,177 3,383,631 1,934,365 64% 423 SEWER/WWTP UTILITY FUND 3 11,917,843 8,776,072 7,559,156 4,358,687 63% 424 BOND RESERVE FUND 1,991,530 654,346 640,747 1,350,783 32% 511 EQUIPMENT RENTAL FUND 1,624,640 1,264,299 1,138,622 486,018 70% 512 TECHNOLOGY RENTAL FUND 1,268,390 649,018 848,978 419,412 67% 617 FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND 69,690 60,705 49,564 20,126 71% 83,871,104$ 51,639,609$ 55,081,395$ 28,789,709$ 66% 3 Differences primarily due to differences in contributed capital billings to WWTP partners in 2018. CITY OF EDMONDS REVENUES BY FUND - SUMMARY 2 Differences primarily due to a 9% increase in water, and 10% increase in storm base rates in 2018. 1 Differences primarily due to a $418,216 deposit in total for Real Estate Excise Tax in March 2018 from the State. 4.3.a Packet Pg. 57 Attachment: August 2018 Monthly Financial Report (August 2018 Monthly Financial Report) 2 Page 1 of 1 Fund No.Title 2018 Amended Budget 8/31/2017 Expenditures 8/31/2018 Expenditures Amount Remaining % Spent 001 GENERAL FUND 44,334,660$ 25,860,948$ 26,305,714$ 18,028,946$ 59% 009 LEOFF-MEDICAL INS. RESERVE 363,438 199,587 265,598 97,840 73% 011 RISK MANAGEMENT FUND - 81,277 - - 0% 012 CONTINGENCY RESERVE FUND 4 49,584 - 334,494 (284,910) 675% 014 HISTORIC PRESERVATION GIFT FUND 5,400 - - 5,400 0% 016 BUILDING MAINTENANCE - 206,006 - - 0% 104 DRUG ENFORCEMENT FUND 103,252 48,587 72,276 30,976 70% 111 STREET FUND 1,856,507 1,114,484 1,129,150 727,357 61% 112 COMBINED STREET CONST/IMPROVE 3,747,838 2,780,102 2,382,221 1,365,617 64% 117 MUNICIPAL ARTS ACQUIS. FUND 183,892 34,950 41,004 142,889 22% 120 HOTEL/MOTEL TAX REVENUE FUND 90,550 44,189 29,171 61,379 32% 121 EMPLOYEE PARKING PERMIT FUND 26,880 1,638 - 26,880 0% 122 YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP FUND 1,000 1,021 1,532 (532) 153% 123 TOURISM PROMOTIONAL FUND/ARTS 29,700 17,531 9,059 20,641 31% 125 REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 2 2,733,000 752,938 662,049 2,070,951 24% 126 REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 1, PARKS ACQ FUND 2,651,867 179,271 392,898 2,258,969 15% 127 GIFTS CATALOG FUND 70,900 28,309 15,606 55,294 22% 130 CEMETERY MAINTENANCE/IMPROVEMT 213,509 107,439 134,541 78,968 63% 138 SISTER CITY COMMISSION 10,500 4,285 385 10,115 4% 140 BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 5 - 50,504 58,055 (58,055) 0% 211 L.I.D. FUND CONTROL 16,450 16,450 - 16,450 0% 231 2012 LT GO DEBT SERVICE FUND 708,700 64,938 59,284 649,416 8% 332 PARKS CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION FUND 2,346,881 497,500 260,329 2,086,552 11% 421 WATER UTILITY FUND 13,434,675 5,160,481 6,976,403 6,458,272 52% 422 STORM UTILITY FUND 6,953,660 2,275,698 2,323,341 4,630,319 33% 423 SEWER/WWTP UTILITY FUND 14,166,002 8,554,084 6,865,075 7,300,927 48% 424 BOND RESERVE FUND 1,991,520 654,342 640,742 1,350,778 32% 511 EQUIPMENT RENTAL FUND 1,670,082 1,275,404 803,858 866,224 48% 512 TECHNOLOGY RENTAL FUND 1,335,413 483,955 725,215 610,198 54% 617 FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND 75,218 45,604 51,286 23,932 68% 99,171,078$ 50,541,521$ 50,539,286$ 48,631,792$ 51% CITY OF EDMONDS EXPENDITURES BY FUND - SUMMARY 5 Business Improvement District is not included in the City Budget; activity is here for reporting purposes only. 4 2018 Expenditures includes interfund loans to 104 for $16,680 and to 112 for $268,230. 4.3.a Packet Pg. 58 Attachment: August 2018 Monthly Financial Report (August 2018 Monthly Financial Report) 3 Page 1 of 3 Title 2018 Amended Budget 8/31/2017 Revenues 8/31/2018 Revenues Amount Remaining % Received TAXES: REAL PERSONAL / PROPERTY TAX 6 10,367,860$ 5,562,817$ 5,654,951$ 4,712,909$ 55% EMS PROPERTY TAX 4,027,540 2,150,538 2,167,386 1,860,154 54% VOTED PROPERTY TAX 2,500 14,116 2,969 (469) 119% LOCAL RETAIL SALES/USE TAX 7 7,275,000 4,805,603 5,410,151 1,864,849 74% NATURAL GAS USE TAX 7,140 7,239 3,142 3,999 44% 1/10 SALES TAX LOCAL CRIM JUST 730,000 461,459 499,070 230,930 68% ELECTRIC UTILITY TAX 1,611,600 1,217,184 1,213,435 398,165 75% GAS UTILITY TAX 620,200 528,405 466,145 154,055 75% SOLID WASTE UTILITY TAX 321,600 218,817 234,231 87,369 73% WATER UTILITY TAX 1,201,100 754,603 764,658 436,442 64% SEWER UTILITY TAX 769,800 458,180 510,565 259,235 66% STORMWATER UTILITY TAX 406,200 266,375 291,071 115,129 72% T.V. CABLE UTILITY TAX 867,200 579,055 542,066 325,134 63% TELEPHONE UTILITY TAX 1,093,200 736,483 670,052 423,148 61% PULLTABS TAX 56,600 40,587 39,163 17,437 69% AMUSEMENT GAMES 40 - - 40 0% LEASEHOLD EXCISE TAX 263,600 162,364 204,447 59,153 78% 29,621,180 17,963,824 18,673,502 10,947,678 63% LICENSES AND PERMITS: FIRE PERMITS-SPECIAL USE 250 150 155 95 62% POLICE - FINGERPRINTING 300 513 635 (335) 212% PROF AND OCC LICENSE-TAXI 330 - - 330 0% AMUSEMENTS 6,330 6,325 5,950 380 94% VENDING MACHINE/CONCESSION 50,000 40,862 28,489 21,511 57% FRANCHISE AGREEMENT-COMCAST 721,000 544,624 513,468 207,532 71% FRANCHISE FEE-EDUCATION/GOVERNMENT 42,600 28,169 27,833 14,767 65% FRANCHISE AGREEMENT-VERIZON/FRONTIER 105,500 79,762 80,664 24,836 76% FRANCHISE AGREEMENT-BLACKROCK 18,600 10,106 7,220 11,380 39% OLYMPIC VIEW WATER DISTRICT FRANCHISE 263,800 215,607 244,463 19,337 93% GENERAL BUSINESS LICENSE 121,600 66,435 76,253 45,347 63% DEV SERV PERMIT SURCHARGE 64,940 50,547 54,645 10,295 84% NON-RESIDENT BUS LICENSE 69,000 48,450 45,750 23,250 66% RIGHT OF WAY FRANCHISE FEE 12,000 13,880 52,816 (40,816) 440%BUILDING STRUCTURE PERMITS 715,600 574,525 498,945 216,655 70% ANIMAL LICENSES 24,500 12,689 11,544 12,956 47% STREET AND CURB PERMIT 40,000 32,466 40,835 (835) 102% OTR NON-BUS LIC/PERMITS 14,500 12,447 15,601 (1,101) 108% 2,270,850 1,737,555 1,705,268 565,582 75% INTERGOVERNMENTAL: DOJ 15-0404-0-1-754 - BULLET PROOF VEST 7,930 5,949 4,535 3,395 57% TARGET ZERO TEAMS GRANT 4,000 1,030 2,937 1,063 73% HIGH VISIBILITY ENFORCEMENT 7,100 4,767 8,602 (1,502) 121% DOCKSIDE DRILLS GRANT REIMBURSE - 1,399 1,455 (1,455) 0% DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES - - 17,347 (17,347) 0% WA STATE TRAFFIC COMM GRANT - - 3,623 (3,623) 0% STATE GRANTS - BUDGET ONLY 18,000 - - 18,000 0% WATERFRONT ANALYSIS GRANT - 10,000 - - 0% PUD PRIVILEDGE TAX 198,000 - - 198,000 0% MVET/SPECIAL DISTRIBUTION 12,790 8,612 8,906 3,884 70% TRIAL COURT IMPROVEMENT 16,716 8,358 12,400 4,316 74% AOC PRO-TEM JUDGE REIMBURSEMENT - - 705 (705) 0% CRIMINAL JUSTICE-SPECIAL PROGRAMS 43,700 31,283 32,213 11,487 74% MARIJUANA ENFORCEMENT - - - 0% MARIJUANA EXCISE TAX DISTRIBUTION 23,700 - 44,380 (20,680) 187% DUI - CITIES 3,000 4,660 4,575 (1,575) 152% LIQUOR EXCISE TAX 203,000 143,816 152,009 50,991 75% LIQUOR BOARD PROFITS 350,600 172,712 170,954 179,646 49% MISCELLANEOUS INTERLOCAL REVENUE 2,500 - - 2,500 0% INTERLOCAL GRANTS - 35,000 25,000 (25,000) 0% VERDANT INTERLOCAL GRANTS 2,000 2,000 5,810 (3,810) 291% FIRST RESPONDERS FLEX FUND - - 1,737 (1,737) 0% POLICE TRAINING CLASSES - 300 - - 0% DISCOVERY PROGRAMS TECHNOLOGY ACQ.- - 2,190 (2,190) 0% 893,036 429,885 499,379 393,657 56% REVENUES - GENERAL FUNDCITY OF EDMONDS 7 2018 Local Retail Sales/Use Tax revenues are $604,548 higher than 2017 revenues. Please also see pages pages 18 & 19. 6 2018 Real Personal/Property Tax Revenues are $92,134 higher than 2017 revenues. 4.3.a Packet Pg. 59 Attachment: August 2018 Monthly Financial Report (August 2018 Monthly Financial Report) 4 Page 2 of 3 Title 2018 Amended Budget 8/31/2017 Revenues 8/31/2018 Revenues Amount Remaining % Received CHARGES FOR GOODS AND SERVICES: RECORD/LEGAL INSTRUMENTS 2,500 2,958 4,150 (1,650) 166% ATM SURCHARGE FEES 400 306 338 63 84% CREDIT CARD FEES 10,000 6,722 8,751 1,249 88% COURT RECORD SERVICES - 367 71 (71) 0% D/M COURT REC SER 400 202 124 276 31% CIVIL FEE - APPEAL - 53 - - 0% WARRANT PREPARATION FEE - - 3,858 (3,858) 0% IT TIME PAY FEE - 14 788 (788) 0% MUNIC.-DIST. COURT CURR EXPEN 300 182 109 191 36% SALE MAPS & BOOKS 100 36 14 86 14% CLERKS TIME FOR SALE OF PARKING PERMITS 25,100 - - 25,100 0% BID SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 600 - - 600 0% PHOTOCOPIES 1,000 677 376 624 38% POLICE DISCLOSURE REQUESTS 4,000 2,321 69 3,931 2% ENGINEERING FEES AND CHARGES 200,000 289,490 173,259 26,741 87% ELECTION CANDIDATE FILING FEES - - 1,486 (1,486) 0% SNO-ISLE 78,000 60,131 70,950 7,050 91% PASSPORTS AND NATURALIZATION FEES 23,000 17,250 16,530 6,470 72% POLICE SERVICES SPECIAL EVENTS 30,000 13,703 32,951 (2,951) 110% CAMPUS SAFETY-EDM. SCH. DIST.66,280 3,161 26,413 39,867 40% WOODWAY-LAW PROTECTION 60,000 50,261 41,488 18,512 69% MISCELLANEOUS POLICE SERVICES 1,500 - - 1,500 0% DUI EMERGENCY FIRE SERVICES 100 - - 100 0% FIRE PROTECTION & EMS FOR DUI - 53 - - 0% FIRE DISTRICT #1 STATION BILLINGS 50,000 42,179 42,516 7,484 85% LEGAL SERVICES - - 731 (731) 0% ADULT PROBATION SERVICE CHARGE 48,600 32,020 39,282 9,318 81% ELECTRIC MONITORING - - 100 (100) 0% BOOKING FEES 3,000 1,884 1,191 1,809 40% FIRE CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION FEES 15,560 13,182 10,865 4,695 70% EMERGENCY SERVICE FEES 4,500 2,719 1,968 2,532 44% EMS TRANSPORT USER FEE 826,000 423,461 838,399 (12,399) 102% FLEX FUEL PAYMENTS FROM STATIONS 2,500 1,743 2,195 305 88% ANIMAL CONTROL SHELTER 250 50 15 235 6% ZONING/SUBDIVISION FEE 80,250 64,643 105,196 (24,946) 131% PLAN CHECKING FEES 443,000 310,171 256,276 186,724 58% FIRE PLAN CHECK FEES 8,000 6,900 5,965 2,035 75% PLANNING 1% INSPECTION FEE 1,600 733 669 931 42% S.E.P.A. REVIEW 5,000 8,040 6,030 (1,030) 121% CRITICAL AREA STUDY 14,000 12,140 13,000 1,000 93% DV COORDINATOR SERVICES 11,460 7,639 8,402 3,058 73% GYM AND WEIGHTROOM FEES 12,000 8,912 8,737 3,263 73% LOCKER FEES - 15 - - 0% PROGRAM FEES 910,100 651,199 671,398 238,702 74% TAXABLE RECREATION ACTIVITIES 1,300 1,008 264 1,036 20% WINTER MARKET REGISTRATION FEES 5,000 700 1,940 3,060 39% BIRD FEST REGISTRATION FEES 1,250 980 805 445 64% INTERFUND REIMBURSEMENT-CONTRACT SVCS 2,043,950 1,574,480 1,719,582 324,368 84% 4,990,600 3,612,685 4,117,249 873,351 83% CITY OF EDMONDS REVENUES - GENERAL FUND 4.3.a Packet Pg. 60 Attachment: August 2018 Monthly Financial Report (August 2018 Monthly Financial Report) 5 Page 3 of 3 Title 2018 Amended Budget 8/31/2017 Revenues 8/31/2018 Revenues Amount Remaining % Received FINES AND PENALTIES: PROOF OF VEHICLE INS PENALTY 5,000 3,224 4,595 405 92% TRAFFIC INFRACTION PENALTIES 215,000 146,289 188,695 26,305 88% NC TRAFFIC INFRACTION 34,000 23,022 21,572 12,428 63% CRT COST FEE CODE LEG ASSESSMENT (LGA)20,700 14,610 23,083 (2,383) 112% NON-TRAFFIC INFRACTION PENALTIES 400 400 3,500 (3,100) 875% OTHER INFRACTIONS '04 3,400 2,091 620 2,780 18% PARKING INFRACTION PENALTIES 48,000 31,189 112,275 (64,275) 234% PARK/INDDISZONE 2,600 1,645 585 2,015 22% DWI PENALTIES 6,000 4,423 4,753 1,247 79% DUI - DP ACCT 2,000 1,234 575 1,425 29% CRIM CNV FEE DUI 200 130 97 103 48% DUI - DP FEE - 53 1,431 (1,431) 0% OTHER CRIMINAL TRAF MISDEM PEN 135 176 96 39 71% CRIMINAL TRAFFIC MISDEMEANOR 8/03 36,000 23,722 23,261 12,739 65% CRIMINAL CONVICTION FEE CT 2,600 1,805 2,585 15 99% CRIM CONV FEE CT 1,600 1,099 722 878 45% OTHER NON-TRAF MISDEMEANOR PEN 100 32 38 62 38% OTHER NON TRAFFIC MISD. 8/03 9,300 6,305 7,903 1,397 85% COURT DV PENALTY ASSESSMENT 600 413 403 197 67% CRIMINAL CONVICTION FEE CN 1,100 787 1,033 67 94% CRIM CONV FEE CN 500 253 342 158 68% CRIMINAL COSTS-RECOUPMENTS - 6,171 - - 0% PUBLIC DEFENSE RECOUPMENT 18,500 11,280 13,228 5,272 72% BANK CHARGE FOR CONV. DEFENDANT 6,000 5,906 7,952 (1,952) 133% COURT COST RECOUPMENT 5,000 - 3,986 1,014 80% COURT INTERPRETER COSTS - 246 - - 0% BUS. LICENSE PERMIT PENALTY 11,000 9,330 10,510 490 96% MISC FINES AND PENALTIES 2,000 1,440 505 1,495 25% 431,735 297,276 434,342 (2,607) 101% MISCELLANEOUS: INVESTMENT INTEREST 156,840 92,539 112,314 44,526 72% INTEREST ON COUNTY TAXES 7,130 6,628 11,725 (4,595) 164% INTEREST - COURT COLLECTIONS 6,500 4,631 5,957 543 92% PARKING 15,600 11,961 4,062 11,538 26% SPACE/FACILITIES RENTALS 147,000 98,964 108,364 38,636 74% BRACKET ROOM RENTAL 5,000 3,520 1,540 3,460 31% LEASES LONG-TERM 185,000 121,590 125,228 59,772 68% OTHER RENTS & USE CHARGES 2,400 1,800 - 2,400 0% DONATION/CONTRIBUTION - - 1,281 (1,281) 0% PARKS DONATIONS 4,350 3,650 3,380 970 78% BIRD FEST CONTRIBUTIONS 1,500 1,890 1,390 110 93% FIRST RESPONDERS - PRIVATE SOURCE - - 28,000 (28,000) 0% VOLUNTEER PICNIC CONTRIBUTIONS 1,000 - - 1,000 0% POLICE CONTRIBUTIONS FROM PRIV SOURCES 1,000 - - 1,000 0% SALE OF JUNK/SALVAGE 300 4,842 58 242 19% SALES OF UNCLAIM PROPERTY 3,000 1,738 1,631 1,369 54% CONFISCATED AND FORFEITED PROPERTY 2,000 - - 2,000 0% OTHER JUDGEMENT/SETTLEMENT 2,000 7 - 2,000 0% POLICE JUDGMENTS/RESTITUTION 200 86 60 140 30% CASHIER'S OVERAGES/SHORTAGES - 222 (76) 76 0% OTHER MISC REVENUES 8 652,000 5,477 308,712 343,288 47% SMALL OVERPAYMENT 30 29 51 (21) 171% NSF FEES - PARKS & REC 120 - - 120 0% NSF FEES - MUNICIPAL COURT 300 335 236 64 79% NSF FEES - POLICE - 60 30 (30) 0% US BANK REBATE 7,500 6,629 7,168 332 96%1,200,770 366,598 721,112 479,658 60% TRANSFERS-IN: INSURANCE RECOVERIES - 7,143 - - 0% INTERFUND TRANSFER FROM FUND 012 49,584 - 49,584 - 100% TRANSFER FROM FUND 127 26,300 26,300 13,150 13,150 50%75,884 33,443 62,734 13,150 83% TOTAL GENERAL FUND REVENUE 39,484,055$ 24,441,266$ 26,213,586$ 13,270,469$ 66% CITY OF EDMONDS 8 $650,000 of this represents a short-term loan to the ECA for a roof/equipment project. REVENUES - GENERAL FUND 4.3.a Packet Pg. 61 Attachment: August 2018 Monthly Financial Report (August 2018 Monthly Financial Report) 6 Page 1 of 6 Title 2018 Amended Budget 8/31/2017 Expenditures 8/31/2018 Expenditures Amount Remaining % Spent GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES (001) SALARIES AND WAGES 15,512,846$ 9,304,936$ 9,702,032$ 5,810,814$ 63% OVERTIME 493,580 341,151 447,897 45,683 91% HOLIDAY BUY BACK 243,389 4,413 4,268 239,121 2% BENEFITS 6,172,380 3,610,428 3,771,037 2,401,343 61% UNIFORMS 88,785 43,138 57,762 31,023 65% SUPPLIES 378,580 223,579 248,552 130,028 66% SMALL EQUIPMENT 56,160 39,394 54,943 1,217 98% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3,934,985 1,722,915 1,788,482 2,146,503 45% COMMUNICATIONS 166,585 83,231 97,943 68,642 59% TRAVEL 55,330 33,850 30,376 24,954 55% EXCISE TAXES 6,500 3,287 3,534 2,966 54% RENTAL/LEASE 1,988,447 1,132,444 1,320,388 668,059 66% INSURANCE 624,530 616,495 437,253 187,277 70% UTILITIES 457,800 305,020 325,396 132,404 71% REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 590,713 171,950 182,702 408,011 31% MISCELLANEOUS 517,497 184,339 236,790 280,707 46% INTERGOVERNMENTAL SERVICES 9,901,462 7,455,630 6,317,980 3,583,482 64% INTERGOVERNMENTAL PAYMENTS 9 695,000 - 403,135 291,865 58% INTERFUND SUBSIDIES 1,863,370 537,130 779,625 1,083,745 42% LAND 200,000 - 4,884 195,116 2% BUILDINGS 60,000 - - 60,000 0% MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT 128,721 33,408 80,159 48,562 62% GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND PRINCIPAL 176,340 - - 176,340 0% OTHER INTEREST & DEBT SERVICE COSTS 500 222 - 500 0% INTEREST ON LONG-TERM EXTERNAL DEBT 21,160 13,990 10,576 10,584 50% 44,334,660$ 25,860,948$ 26,305,714$ 18,028,946$ 59% LEOFF-MEDICAL INS. RESERVE (009) BENEFITS 184,000$ 112,922$ 113,183$ 70,817$ 62% PENSION AND DISABILITY PAYMENTS 172,158 84,466 149,054 23,104 87% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 7,000 1,800 2,962 4,038 42% MISCELLANEOUS 280 400 400 (120) 143% 363,438$ 199,587$ 265,598$ 97,840$ 73% RISK MANAGEMENT RESERVE FUND (011) MISCELLANEOUS -$ 81,277$ -$ -$ 0%-$ 81,277$ -$ -$ 0% CONTINGENCY RESERVE FUND (012) INTERFUND SUBSIDIES 49,584$ -$ 49,584$ -$ 100% INTERFUND LOAN 10 - - 284,910 (284,910) 0% 49,584$ -$ 334,494$ (284,910)$ 675% HISTORIC PRESERVATION GIFT FUND (014) SUPPLIES 100$ -$ -$ 100$ 0% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 200 - - 200 0% MISCELLANEOUS 5,100 - - 5,100 0%5,400$ -$ -$ 5,400$ 0% BUILDING MAINTENANCE SUBFUND (016) PROFESSIONAL SERVICES -$ 41,444$ -$ -$ 0% REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - 69,893 - - 0% CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 94,669 - - 0% -$ 206,006$ -$ -$ 0% DRUG ENFORCEMENT FUND (104) FUEL CONSUMED 3,000$ 1,142$ -$ 3,000$ 0% SMALL EQUIPMENT 5,000 - - 5,000 0% COMMUNICATIONS 2,230 802 - 2,230 0% REPAIR/MAINT 800 - - 800 0% MISCELLANEOUS 20,000 5,000 - 20,000 0% INTERGOVERNMENTAL SERVICES 72,222 41,642 72,276 (54) 100%103,252$ 48,587$ 72,276$ 30,976$ 70% EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL CITY OF EDMONDS 9 $650,000 of this represents a short-term loan to the ECA for a roof/equipment project. 10 2018 Expenditures includes interfund loans to 104 for $16,680 and to 112 for $268,230. 4.3.a Packet Pg. 62 Attachment: August 2018 Monthly Financial Report (August 2018 Monthly Financial Report) 7 Page 2 of 6 Title 2018 Amended Budget 8/31/2017 Expenditures 8/31/2018 Expenditures Amount Remaining % Spent STREET FUND (111) SALARIES AND WAGES 551,495$ 351,015$ 330,944$ 220,551$ 60% OVERTIME 24,400 19,129 16,656 7,744 68% BENEFITS 286,892 180,070 163,342 123,550 57% UNIFORMS 6,000 3,711 3,136 2,864 52% SUPPLIES 310,000 127,120 137,695 172,305 44% SMALL EQUIPMENT 20,000 8,892 396 19,604 2% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 16,050 9,654 8,431 7,619 53% COMMUNICATIONS 4,500 4,526 4,840 (340) 108% TRAVEL 1,000 - - 1,000 0% RENTAL/LEASE 187,150 121,564 126,010 61,140 67% INSURANCE 113,230 110,508 156,645 (43,415) 138% UTILITIES 273,170 158,808 165,167 108,003 60% REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 45,000 12,894 13,884 31,116 31% MISCELLANEOUS 8,000 2,595 829 7,171 10% INTERGOVERNMENTAL SERVICES 5,000 3,644 854 4,146 17% GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND PRINCIPAL 3,970 - - 3,970 0% INTEREST 650 354 322 328 50% 1,856,507$ 1,114,484$ 1,129,150$ 727,357$ 61% COMBINED STREET CONST/IMPROVE (112) SALARIES AND WAGES -$ 13,853$ 14,754$ (14,754)$ 0% OVERTIME - 672 - - 0% BENEFITS - 5,891 10,186 (10,186) 0% SMALL EQUIPMENT - 2,056 - - 0% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 353,118 623,521 257,794 95,324 73% REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 300,000 34,602 - 300,000 0% INTERFUND SUBSIDIES 47,910 40,711 40,515 7,395 85% LAND 25,000 - - 25,000 0% MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT - 8,166 - - 0% CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 2,946,900 1,975,392 1,984,096 962,804 67% INTERGOVERNMENTAL LOANS 72,220 72,201 72,201 19 100% INTEREST 2,690 3,035 2,674 16 99% 3,747,838$ 2,780,102$ 2,382,221$ 1,365,617$ 64% MUNICIPAL ARTS ACQUIS. FUND (117) SUPPLIES 4,900$ 623$ 171$ 4,729$ 3% SMALL EQUIPMENT 1,700 733 - 1,700 0% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 168,312 30,164 37,090 131,222 22% TRAVEL 80 35 9 71 11% RENTAL/LEASE 2,000 - - 2,000 0% REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 300 - - 300 0% MISCELLANEOUS 6,600 3,395 3,734 2,866 57% 183,892$ 34,950$ 41,004$ 142,889$ 22% HOTEL/MOTEL TAX REVENUE FUND (120) PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 86,300$ 42,189$ 27,171$ 59,129$ 31% MISCELLANEOUS 250 - - 250 0% INTERFUND SUBSIDIES 4,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 50% 90,550$ 44,189$ 29,171$ 61,379$ 32% EMPLOYEE PARKING PERMIT FUND (121) SUPPLIES 1,790$ 1,638$ -$ 1,790$ 0% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 25,090 - - 25,090 0% 26,880$ 1,638$ -$ 26,880$ 0% YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP FUND (122) MISCELLANEOUS 1,000$ 1,021$ 1,532$ (532)$ 153% 1,000$ 1,021$ 1,532$ (532)$ 153% TOURISM PROMOTIONAL FUND/ARTS (123) PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 28,200$ 15,431$ 7,595$ 20,605$ 27% MISCELLANEOUS 1,500 2,100 1,464 36 98% 29,700$ 17,531$ 9,059$ 20,641$ 31% REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 2 (125) SUPPLIES 21,000$ 48,567$ 17,082$ 3,918$ 81% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 65,040 261,471 68,442 (3,402) 105% UTILITIES - 1,649 - - 0% REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 600,000 - 23,121 576,879 4% BUILDINGS 150,000 - - 150,000 0% CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 1,896,960 441,252 553,404 1,343,556 29% 2,733,000$ 752,938$ 662,049$ 2,070,951$ 24% CITY OF EDMONDS EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL 4.3.a Packet Pg. 63 Attachment: August 2018 Monthly Financial Report (August 2018 Monthly Financial Report) 8 Page 3 of 6 Title 2018 Amended Budget 8/31/2017 Expenditures 8/31/2018 Expenditures Amount Remaining % Spent REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 1, PARKS ACQ (126) PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 160,555$ 11,409$ 110,576$ 49,979$ 69% REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 1,031,762 - - 1,031,762 0% INTERFUND SUBSIDIES 135,130 16,163 15,063 120,068 11% LAND - 43,201 - - 0% MISCELLANEOUS 216,720 - 216,720 - 100% CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 1,080,850 106,364 48,666 1,032,184 5% GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS 23,100 - - 23,100 0% INTEREST 3,750 2,062 1,873 1,877 50% OTHER INTEREST & DEBT SERVICE COSTS - 72 - - 0% 2,651,867$ 179,271$ 392,898$ 2,258,969$ 15% GIFTS CATALOG FUND (127) SUPPLIES 37,500$ 2,009$ 2,302$ 35,198$ 6% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 6,500 - - 6,500 0% MISCELLANEOUS 600 - 154 446 26% INTERFUND SUBSIDIES 26,300 26,300 13,150 13,150 50% 70,900$ 28,309$ 15,606$ 55,294$ 22% CEMETERY MAINTENANCE/IMPROVEMENT (130) SALARIES AND WAGES 91,711$ 49,780$ 58,238$ 33,473$ 64% OVERTIME 3,500 2,935 2,122 1,378 61% BENEFITS 38,253 23,471 24,098 14,155 63% UNIFORMS 1,000 - 675 325 67% SUPPLIES 22,995 1,117 17,079 5,916 74% SUPPLIES PURCHASED FOR INVENTORY/RESALE 20,000 8,204 16,281 3,719 81% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 4,200 5,463 1,406 2,794 33% COMMUNICATIONS 1,410 903 1,036 374 73% TRAVEL 500 - - 500 0% RENTAL/LEASE 11,640 7,193 7,760 3,880 67% UTILITIES 3,800 3,209 2,985 815 79% REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 500 - - 500 0% MISCELLANEOUS 14,000 5,162 2,861 11,139 20% 213,509$ 107,439$ 134,541$ 78,968$ 63% SISTER CITY COMMISSION (138) SUPPLIES 1,500$ 243$ 27$ 1,473$ 2% TRAVEL 4,500 2,839 - 4,500 0% MISCELLANEOUS 4,500 1,203 357 4,143 8% 10,500$ 4,285$ 385$ 10,115$ 4% BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT FUND (140) SUPPLIES -$ 842$ 6,892$ (6,892)$ 0% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES - 48,337 47,114 (47,114) 0% MISCELLANEOUS - 1,326 4,049 (4,049) 0% -$ 50,504$ 58,055$ (58,055)$ 0% LID FUND CONTROL (211) INTERFUND SUBSIDIES 16,450$ 16,450$ -$ 16,450$ 0% 16,450$ 16,450$ -$ 16,450$ 0% 2012 LTGO DEBT SERVIC FUND (231) GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND 589,630$ -$ -$ 589,630$ 0% INTEREST 118,580 64,938 59,284 59,296 50% OTHER INTEREST & DEBT SERVICE COSTS 490 - - 490 0% 708,700$ 64,938$ 59,284$ 649,416$ 8% PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND (332) PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 7,160$ 86,049$ 8,146$ (986)$ 114% INTERFUND SUBSIDIES 200,000 - 200,000 - 100% CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 2,139,721 411,450 52,184 2,087,537 2% 2,346,881$ 497,500$ 260,329$ 2,086,552$ 11% CITY OF EDMONDS EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL 4.3.a Packet Pg. 64 Attachment: August 2018 Monthly Financial Report (August 2018 Monthly Financial Report) 9 Page 4 of 6 Title 2018 Amended Budget 8/31/2017 Expenditures 8/31/2018 Expenditures Amount Remaining % Spent WATER FUND (421) SALARIES AND WAGES 828,440$ 500,099$ 486,116$ 342,324$ 59% OVERTIME 24,000 13,813 14,769 9,231 62% BENEFITS 392,984 238,221 227,858 165,126 58% UNIFORMS 4,000 4,727 2,747 1,253 69% SUPPLIES 220,000 103,773 109,023 110,977 50% FUEL CONSUMED - - 70 (70) 0% WATER PURCHASED FOR RESALE 1,800,000 1,043,361 1,169,057 630,943 65% SUPPLIES PURCHASED FOR INVENTORY/RESALE 170,000 149,488 71,061 98,939 42% SMALL EQUIPMENT 11,000 2,165 2,236 8,764 20% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 836,294 968,796 473,664 362,630 57% COMMUNICATIONS 30,000 21,003 18,266 11,734 61% TRAVEL 200 - - 200 0% EXCISE TAXES 400,000 249,921 278,660 121,340 70% RENTAL/LEASE 144,907 95,405 95,005 49,902 66% INSURANCE 56,050 58,214 56,738 (688) 101% UTILITIES 35,000 16,571 16,598 18,402 47% REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 239,500 34,765 16,619 222,881 7% MISCELLANEOUS 84,785 52,299 67,622 17,163 80% INTERGOVERNMENTAL SERVICES 30,000 27,686 28,059 1,941 94% INTERFUND TAXES 1,209,700 754,603 764,658 445,042 63% INTERFUND SUBSIDIES 644,620 215,315 211,087 433,533 33% MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT 15,000 - - 15,000 0% CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 5,648,935 460,364 2,722,157 2,926,778 48% GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS 2,670 - - 2,670 0% REVENUE BONDS 344,650 - - 344,650 0% INTERGOVERNMENTAL LOANS 25,840 25,839 25,839 1 100% INTEREST 236,100 123,678 118,495 117,605 50% OTHER INTEREST & DEBT SERVICE COSTS - 375 - - 0% 13,434,675$ 5,160,481$ 6,976,403$ 6,458,272$ 52% STORM FUND (422) SALARIES AND WAGES 677,138$ 388,887$ 427,897$ 249,241$ 63% OVERTIME 6,000 8,071 6,809 (809) 113% BENEFITS 356,297 204,327 218,029 138,268 61% UNIFORMS 6,500 4,600 4,831 1,669 74% SUPPLIES 46,000 25,729 22,079 23,921 48% SMALL EQUIPMENT 4,000 5,880 74 3,926 2% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 686,923 672,524 476,596 210,327 69% COMMUNICATIONS 3,200 3,316 3,105 95 97% TRAVEL 4,300 - 840 3,460 20% EXCISE TAXES 55,000 37,697 41,531 13,469 76% RENTAL/LEASE 250,767 173,970 164,451 86,316 66% INSURANCE 71,540 72,028 178,798 (107,258) 250% UTILITES 10,500 6,563 6,537 3,963 62% REPAIR & MAINTENANCE 15,000 13,943 11,160 3,840 74% MISCELLANEOUS 88,500 55,004 65,498 23,002 74% INTERGOVERNMENTAL SERVICES 150,000 66,686 80,523 69,477 54% INTERFUND TAXES AND OPERATING ASSESSMENT 406,100 266,375 291,071 115,029 72% INTERFUND SUBSIDIES 298,500 84,737 83,159 215,341 28% MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT 315,000 - - 315,000 0% CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 3,074,815 84,252 142,827 2,931,988 5% GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS 97,320 - - 97,320 0% REVENUE BONDS 168,360 - - 168,360 0% INTERGOVERNMENTAL LOANS 32,070 32,063 32,063 8 100% INTEREST 129,830 68,881 65,463 64,367 50% OTHER INTEREST & DEBT SERVICE COSTS - 165 - - 0% 6,953,660$ 2,275,698$ 2,323,341$ 4,630,319$ 33% EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL CITY OF EDMONDS 4.3.a Packet Pg. 65 Attachment: August 2018 Monthly Financial Report (August 2018 Monthly Financial Report) 10 Page 5 of 6 Title 2018 Amended Budget 8/31/2017 Expenditures 8/31/2018 Expenditures Amount Remaining % Spent SEWER FUND (423) SALARIES AND WAGES 1,793,854$ 1,119,780$ 1,106,388$ 687,466$ 62% OVERTIME 95,000 66,410 58,999 36,001 62% BENEFITS 821,233 512,455 500,960 320,273 61% UNIFORMS 9,500 7,363 6,287 3,213 66% SUPPLIES 432,200 116,159 201,875 230,325 47% FUEL CONSUMED 80,000 51,745 35,918 44,082 45% SUPPLIES PURCHASED FOR INV OR RESALE 4,000 2,989 - 4,000 0% SMALL EQUIPMENT 50,000 17,570 31,998 18,002 64% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,307,274 1,368,283 686,071 621,203 52% COMMUNICATIONS 43,000 26,187 28,593 14,407 66% TRAVEL 5,000 - 2,122 2,878 42% EXCISE TAXES 200,000 154,508 144,260 55,740 72% RENTAL/LEASE 310,809 202,074 205,206 105,603 66% INSURANCE 109,270 116,720 117,717 (8,447) 108% UTILITIES 1,217,860 452,976 676,491 541,369 56% REPAIR & MAINTENANCE 340,000 171,408 288,320 51,680 85% MISCELLANEOUS 105,450 71,758 55,822 49,628 53% INTERGOVERNMENTAL SERVICES 168,000 66,576 95,112 72,888 57% INTERFUND TAXES AND OPERATING ASSESSMENT 763,000 458,180 510,565 252,435 67% INTERFUND SUBSIDIES 1,678,327 1,210,036 413,431 1,264,896 25% MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT 85,000 87,791 79,862 5,138 94% CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 4,068,435 2,068,705 1,397,862 2,670,573 34% GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS 148,140 - - 148,140 0% REVENUE BONDS 77,010 - - 77,010 0% INTERGOVERNMENTAL LOANS 171,890 157,346 171,872 18 100% INTEREST 81,750 43,880 44,050 37,700 54% OTHER INTEREST & DEBT SERVICE COSTS - 3,187 5,297 (5,297) 0% 14,166,002$ 8,554,084$ 6,865,075$ 7,300,927$ 48% BOND RESERVE FUND (424) REVENUE BONDS 710,020$ -$ -$ 710,020$ 0% INTEREST 1,281,500 654,342 640,742 640,758 50% 1,991,520$ 654,342$ 640,742$ 1,350,778$ 32% EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL CITY OF EDMONDS 4.3.a Packet Pg. 66 Attachment: August 2018 Monthly Financial Report (August 2018 Monthly Financial Report) 11 Page 6 of 6 Title 2018 Amended Budget 8/31/2017 Expenditures 8/31/2018 Expenditures Amount Remaining % Spent EQUIPMENT RENTAL FUND (511) SALARIES AND WAGES 250,519$ 155,735$ 168,649$ 81,870$ 67% OVERTIME 2,000 48 - 2,000 0% BENEFITS 114,956 68,670 72,047 42,909 63% UNIFORMS 1,000 595 852 148 85% SUPPLIES 110,000 45,983 45,351 64,649 41% FUEL CONSUMED 1,000 - - 1,000 0% SUPPLIES PURCHASED FOR INVENTORY/RESALE 268,000 115,596 109,954 158,046 41% SMALL EQUIPMENT 58,000 52,788 5,621 52,379 10% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 44,000 1,839 2,720 41,280 6% COMMUNICATIONS 3,000 1,493 1,496 1,504 50% TRAVEL 1,000 - 339 661 34% RENTAL/LEASE 9,780 9,958 6,250 3,530 64% INSURANCE 29,010 26,351 29,464 (454) 102% UTILITIES 14,000 8,463 8,720 5,280 62% REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 60,000 33,792 19,525 40,475 33% MISCELLANEOUS 12,000 7,829 7,445 4,555 62% INTERGOVERNMENTAL SERVICES 2,500 1,189 1,489 1,011 60% MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT 689,317 745,075 323,937 365,380 47% 1,670,082$ 1,275,404$ 803,858$ 866,224$ 48% TECHNOLOGY RENTAL FUND (512) SALARIES AND WAGES 283,742$ 184,870$ 186,309$ 97,433$ 66% OVERTIME 2,000 30 1,330 670 66% BENEFITS 98,101 61,136 62,169 35,932 63% SUPPLIES 5,000 12,225 3,661 1,339 73% SMALL EQUIPMENT 300,000 37,421 88,756 211,244 30% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 203,300 17,662 162,866 40,434 80% COMMUNICATIONS 58,770 28,720 27,657 31,113 47% TRAVEL 1,500 (17) 412 1,088 27% RENTAL/LEASE 6,810 6,251 5,559 1,251 82% REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 315,190 126,182 130,597 184,593 41% MISCELLANEOUS 5,000 9,474 9,320 (4,320) 186% MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT 56,000 - 46,580 9,420 83% 1,335,413$ 483,955$ 725,215$ 610,198$ 54% FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND (617) BENEFITS 23,000$ 14,053$ 15,687$ 7,313$ 68% PENSION AND DISABILITY PAYMENTS 51,018 31,551 35,061 15,957 69% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,200 - 538 662 45% 75,218$ 45,604$ 51,286$ 23,932$ 68% TOTAL EXPENDITURE ALL FUNDS 99,171,078$ 50,541,521$ 50,539,286$ 48,631,792$ 51% CITY OF EDMONDS EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL 4.3.a Packet Pg. 67 Attachment: August 2018 Monthly Financial Report (August 2018 Monthly Financial Report) 12 Page 1 of 1 Title 2018 Amended Budget 8/31/2017 Expenditures 8/31/2018 Expenditures Amount Remaining % Spent CITY COUNCIL 580,919$ 197,804$ 309,376$ 271,543$ 53% OFFICE OF MAYOR 297,088 182,492 192,272 104,816 65% HUMAN RESOURCES 477,314 245,681 279,002 198,312 58% MUNICIPAL COURT 1,105,852 640,933 663,923 441,929 60% CITY CLERK 697,748 428,048 464,996 232,752 67% FINANCE 1,237,786 709,795 722,494 515,292 58% CITY ATTORNEY 847,480 509,955 552,195 295,285 65% NON-DEPARTMENTAL 14,260,547 8,967,984 8,273,085 5,987,462 58% POLICE SERVICES 11,294,351 6,479,161 7,232,795 4,061,556 64% COMMUNITY SERVICES/ECONOMIC DEV.590,461 335,997 372,264 218,197 63% DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 3,318,150 1,743,617 1,740,882 1,577,268 52% PARKS & RECREATION 4,411,972 2,595,035 2,536,505 1,875,467 57% PUBLIC WORKS 3,114,829 1,761,753 1,829,913 1,284,916 59% FACILITIES MAINTENANCE 2,100,163 1,062,692 1,136,010 964,153 54% 44,334,660$ 25,860,948$ 26,305,714$ 18,028,946$ 59% Title 2018 Amended Budget 8/31/2017 Expenditures 8/31/2018 Expenditures Amount Remaining % Spent WATER UTILITY FUND 13,434,675$ 5,160,481$ 6,976,403$ 6,458,272$ 52% STORM UTILITY FUND 6,953,660 2,275,698 2,323,341 4,630,319 33% SEWER/WWTP UTILITY FUND 14,166,002 8,554,084 6,865,075 7,300,927 48% BOND RESERVE FUND 1,991,520 654,342 640,742 1,350,778 32% 36,545,857$ 16,644,604$ 16,805,562$ 19,740,295$ 46% EXPENDITURES - GENERAL FUND - BY DEPARTMENT IN SUMMARY EXPENDITURES - UTILITY- BY FUND IN SUMMARY CITY OF EDMONDS CITY OF EDMONDS 4.3.a Packet Pg. 68 Attachment: August 2018 Monthly Financial Report (August 2018 Monthly Financial Report) 13 Page 1 of 4 Title 2018 Amended Budget 8/31/2017 Expenditures 8/31/2018 Expenditures Amount Remaining % Spent CITY COUNCIL SALARIES 169,808$ 113,382$ 107,684$ 62,124$ 63% OVERTIME 1,000 - - 1,000 0% BENEFITS 119,687 69,298 61,711 57,976 52% SUPPLIES 2,000 1,059 884 1,116 44% SMALL EQUIPMENT - 285 15,089 (15,089) 0% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 237,160 1,644 102,018 135,142 43% COMMUNICATIONS 3,000 2,101 2,511 489 84% TRAVEL 6,700 1,095 1,430 5,270 21% RENTAL/LEASE 16,064 5,720 10,879 5,185 68% REPAIRS/MAINTENANCE 500 - - 500 0% MISCELLANEOUS 25,000 3,220 7,171 17,829 29% 580,919$ 197,804$ 309,376$ 271,543$ 53% OFFICE OF MAYOR SALARIES 208,326$ 134,880$ 139,544$ 68,782$ 67% BENEFITS 53,611 32,982 33,277 20,334 62% SUPPLIES 1,500 416 387 1,113 26% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,000 1,582 1,943 57 97% COMMUNICATION 1,400 810 1,188 212 85% TRAVEL 4,000 1,053 829 3,171 21% RENTAL/LEASE 21,801 7,275 13,845 7,956 64% MISCELLANEOUS 4,450 3,494 1,258 3,192 28% 297,088$ 182,492$ 192,272$ 104,816$ 65% HUMAN RESOURCES SALARIES 249,577$ 144,600$ 152,969$ 96,608$ 61% OVERTIME - 369 - - 0% BENEFITS 84,882 50,014 58,158 26,724 69% SUPPLIES 2,300 850 2,845 (545) 124% SMALL EQUIPMENT 300 110 - 300 0% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 78,000 27,164 36,520 41,480 47% COMMUNICATIONS 700 713 811 (111) 116% TRAVEL 1,000 337 1,201 (201) 120% RENTAL/LEASE 25,525 14,267 17,703 7,822 69% REPAIR/MAINTENANCE 7,850 7,056 7,326 524 93%MISCELLANEOUS 27,180 202 1,469 25,711 5% 477,314$ 245,681$ 279,002$ 198,312$ 58% MUNICIPAL COURT SALARIES 587,898$ 388,256$ 375,717$ 212,181$ 64% OVERTIME 800 441 75 725 9% BENEFITS 245,141 151,658 148,891 96,250 61% SUPPLIES 9,600 4,458 5,870 3,730 61% SMALL EQUIPMENT 1,000 474 35 965 4% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 91,925 53,876 62,290 29,635 68% COMMUNICATIONS 2,700 1,724 1,714 986 63% TRAVEL 6,500 1,708 3,565 2,935 55% RENTAL/LEASE 71,204 26,296 48,210 22,994 68% REPAIR/MAINTENANCE 4,263 537 - 4,263 0% MISCELLANEOUS 14,000 11,505 17,556 (3,556) 125% MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT 70,821 - - 70,821 0% 1,105,852$ 640,933$ 663,923$ 441,929$ 60% EXPENDITURES - GENERAL FUND - BY DEPARTMENT IN DETAIL CITY OF EDMONDS 4.3.a Packet Pg. 69 Attachment: August 2018 Monthly Financial Report (August 2018 Monthly Financial Report) 14 Page 2 of 4 Title 2018 Amended Budget 8/31/2017 Expenditures 8/31/2018 Expenditures Amount Remaining % Spent CITY CLERK SALARIES AND WAGES 345,266$ 217,796$ 257,931$ 87,335$ 75% BENEFITS 163,547 98,612 104,624 58,923 64% SUPPLIES 10,240 3,104 2,572 7,668 25% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 28,310 21,446 14,137 14,173 50% COMMUNICATIONS 50,000 17,691 16,649 33,351 33% TRAVEL 1,000 315 437 563 44% RENTAL/LEASE 64,305 33,984 41,187 23,118 64% REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 31,080 30,422 22,298 8,782 72% MISCELLANEOUS 4,000 4,679 5,160 (1,160) 129% 697,748$ 428,048$ 464,996$ 232,752$ 67% FINANCE SALARIES 821,066$ 455,260$ 480,900$ 340,166$ 59% OVERTIME 4,500 - 146 4,354 3% BENEFITS 284,724 150,220 154,259 130,465 54% SUPPLIES 7,350 3,136 2,186 5,164 30% SMALL EQUIPMENT 5,400 1,612 3,831 1,569 71% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 9,300 32,838 109 9,191 1% COMMUNICATIONS 2,000 1,098 891 1,109 45% TRAVEL 3,100 1,577 3,043 57 98% RENTAL/LEASE 48,146 20,801 32,592 15,554 68%REPAIR/MAINTENANCE 38,500 40,372 41,121 (2,621) 107%MISCELLANEOUS 13,700 2,880 3,417 10,283 25% 1,237,786$ 709,795$ 722,494$ 515,292$ 58% CITY ATTORNEY PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 847,480$ 509,955$ 552,195$ 295,285$ 65% 847,480$ 509,955$ 552,195$ 295,285$ 65% NON-DEPARTMENTAL BENEFITS - UNEMPLOYMENT -$ 811$ 8,709$ (8,709)$ 0% SUPPLIES 5,000 889 679 4,321 14% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 717,430 318,092 297,568 419,862 41% EXCISE TAXES 6,500 3,287 3,534 2,966 54% RENTAL/LEASE 10,307 8,187 7,579 2,728 74% INSURANCE 624,530 616,495 437,253 187,277 70% MISCELLANEOUS 164,070 49,206 49,695 114,375 30% INTERGOVT SERVICES 9,776,340 7,419,677 6,269,849 3,506,491 64% ECA LOAN PAYMENT 695,000 - 403,135 291,865 58% INTERFUND SUBSIDIES 1,863,370 537,130 779,625 1,083,745 42% LAND 200,000 - 4,884 195,116 2% GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND 176,340 - - 176,340 0% INTEREST ON LONG-TERM DEBT 21,160 13,990 10,576 10,584 50% FISCAL AGENT FEES 500 222 - 500 0% 14,260,547$ 8,967,984$ 8,273,085$ 5,987,462$ 58% CITY OF EDMONDS EXPENDITURES - GENERAL FUND - BY DEPARTMENT IN DETAIL 4.3.a Packet Pg. 70 Attachment: August 2018 Monthly Financial Report (August 2018 Monthly Financial Report) 15 Page 3 of 4 Title 2018 Amended Budget 8/31/2017 Expenditures 8/31/2018 Expenditures Amount Remaining % Spent POLICE SERVICES SALARIES 6,560,766$ 3,847,834$ 4,166,771$ 2,393,995$ 64% OVERTIME 463,280 310,134 412,239 51,041 89% HOLIDAY BUYBACK 243,389 4,413 4,268 239,121 2% BENEFITS 2,543,628 1,497,212 1,642,254 901,374 65% UNIFORMS 78,650 36,526 51,063 27,587 65% SUPPLIES 86,500 36,354 53,638 32,862 62% SMALL EQUIPMENT 28,610 17,055 19,783 8,827 69% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 123,420 58,584 78,467 44,953 64% COMMUNICATIONS 32,000 23,268 26,631 5,369 83% TRAVEL 19,310 18,322 14,887 4,423 77% RENTAL/LEASE 984,878 557,551 653,564 331,314 66% REPAIR/MAINTENANCE 15,120 4,235 6,314 8,806 42% MISCELLANEOUS 46,350 26,188 39,372 6,978 85% INTERGOVTL SERVICES 10,550 8,078 4,259 6,291 40% MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT 57,900 33,408 59,284 (1,384) 102% 11,294,351$ 6,479,161$ 7,232,795$ 4,061,556$ 64% COMMUNITY SERVICES/ECON DEV. SALARIES 238,449$ 154,134$ 157,168$ 81,281$ 66% BENEFITS 76,571 47,820 49,453 27,118 65% SUPPLIES 7,000 7,155 6,335 665 91% SMALL EQUIPMENT 800 - - 800 0% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 240,400 117,268 146,060 94,340 61% COMMUNICATIONS 1,490 717 808 682 54% TRAVEL 2,000 529 746 1,254 37% RENTAL/LEASE 13,751 6,383 8,082 5,669 59% REPAIR/MAINTENANCE 500 - - 500 0% MISCELLANEOUS 9,500 1,991 3,613 5,887 38% 590,461$ 335,997$ 372,264$ 218,197$ 63% DEVELOPMENT SERVICES/PLANNING SALARIES 1,623,298$ 986,682$ 983,233$ 640,065$ 61% OVERTIME 1,300 6,881 16,789 (15,489) 1291% BENEFITS 625,023 359,516 368,849 256,174 59% UNIFORMS 500 - - 500 0% SUPPLIES 16,100 7,938 6,964 9,136 43% SMALL EQUIPMENT 6,100 4,874 5,930 170 97% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 789,960 253,099 227,775 562,185 29% COMMUNICATIONS 9,000 4,815 5,708 3,292 63% TRAVEL 4,750 4,208 2,583 2,167 54% RENTAL/LEASE 156,959 98,069 104,147 52,812 66% REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 31,100 - 15 31,085 0% MISCELLANEOUS 54,060 17,535 18,888 35,172 35% 3,318,150$ 1,743,617$ 1,740,882$ 1,577,268$ 52% ENGINEERING SALARIES 1,661,359$ 952,791$ 949,761$ 711,598$ 57% OVERTIME 5,000 104 4,968 32 99% BENEFITS 710,496 395,183 391,147 319,349 55% UNIFORMS 360 - - 360 0% SMALL EQUIPMENT 2,200 2,126 3,645 (1,445) 166% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 28,240 23,898 14,587 13,653 52% COMMUNICATIONS 16,625 7,657 9,569 7,056 58% TRAVEL 600 39 89 511 15% RENTAL/LEASE 120,624 59,886 79,169 41,456 66% REPAIR/MAINTENANCE 2,600 587 - 2,600 0% MISCELLANEOUS 52,677 10,383 40,838 11,839 78% 2,600,781$ 1,452,654$ 1,493,771$ 1,107,010$ 57% CITY OF EDMONDS EXPENDITURES - GENERAL FUND - BY DEPARTMENT IN DETAIL 4.3.a Packet Pg. 71 Attachment: August 2018 Monthly Financial Report (August 2018 Monthly Financial Report) 16 Page 4 of 4 Title 2018 Amended Budget 8/31/2017 Expenditures 8/31/2018 Expenditures Amount Remaining % Spent PARKS & RECREATION SALARIES 2,048,165$ 1,262,798$ 1,266,654$ 781,511$ 62% OVERTIME 10,000 16,448 9,691 309 97% BENEFITS 847,782 496,433 479,870 367,912 57% UNIFORMS 6,275 3,020 2,583 3,692 41% SUPPLIES 125,390 92,326 96,671 28,719 77% SMALL EQUIPMENT 7,750 12,330 5,161 2,589 67% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 595,160 290,043 231,447 363,713 39% COMMUNICATIONS 30,320 11,157 19,734 10,586 65% TRAVEL 4,870 4,668 1,566 3,304 32% RENTAL/LEASE 264,378 192,019 178,687 85,691 68% PUBLIC UTILITY 175,000 112,313 128,349 46,651 73% REPAIR/MAINTENANCE 29,700 23,374 3,315 26,385 11% MISCELLANEOUS 92,610 50,232 48,030 44,580 52% INTERGOVTL SERVICES 114,572 27,876 43,872 70,700 38% BUILDINGS 60,000 - - 60,000 0% MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT - - 20,875 (20,875) 0% 4,411,972$ 2,595,035$ 2,536,505$ 1,875,467$ 57% PUBLIC WORKS SALARIES 279,248$ 183,056$ 184,004$ 95,244$ 66% OVERTIME 200 - - 200 0% BENEFITS 92,055 58,427 66,783 25,272 73% SUPPLIES 8,600 3,403 2,138 6,462 25% SMALL EQUIPMENT 1,000 - - 1,000 0% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 200 65 68 132 34% COMMUNICATIONS 1,350 436 443 907 33% TRAVEL 500 - - 500 0% RENTAL/LEASE 122,195 61,751 80,695 41,500 66% PUBLIC UTILITY 2,800 1,686 1,720 1,080 61% REPAIR/MAINTENANCE 1,000 - - 1,000 0% MISCELLANEOUS 4,900 274 290 4,610 6% 514,048$ 309,099$ 336,142$ 177,906$ 65% FACILITIES MAINTENANCE SALARIES 719,620 463,467 479,696 239,924 67% OVERTIME 7,500 6,775 3,987 3,513 53% BENEFITS 325,233 202,242 203,052 122,181 62% UNIFORMS 3,000 3,593 4,116 (1,116) 137% SUPPLIES 87,000 62,491 67,383 19,617 77% SMALL EQUIPMENT 3,000 528 1,470 1,530 49% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 156,000 13,360 23,298 132,702 15% COMMUNICATIONS 16,000 11,044 11,287 4,713 71% TRAVEL 1,000 - - 1,000 0% RENTAL/LEASE 68,310 40,255 44,048 24,262 64% PUBLIC UTILITY 280,000 191,021 195,327 84,673 70% REPAIR/MAINTENANCE 428,500 65,368 102,313 326,187 24% MISCELLANEOUS 5,000 2,549 34 4,966 1% BUILDINGS - - - - 0% 2,100,163$ 1,062,692$ 1,136,010$ 964,153$ 54% TOTAL GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES 44,334,660$ 25,860,948$ 26,305,714$ 18,028,946$ 59% CITY OF EDMONDS EXPENDITURES - GENERAL FUND - BY DEPARTMENT IN DETAIL 4.3.a Packet Pg. 72 Attachment: August 2018 Monthly Financial Report (August 2018 Monthly Financial Report) 17 General Fund Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals % January 1,987,736$ 1,987,736$ 2,195,035$ 10.43% February 4,780,064 2,792,328 4,464,993 -6.59% March 7,140,338 2,360,274 7,004,229 -1.91% April 10,849,567 3,709,230 9,270,240 -14.56% May 18,359,346 7,509,778 18,167,955 -1.04% June 20,430,442 2,071,096 21,117,777 3.36% July 22,471,701 2,041,259 23,448,404 4.35% August 24,804,374 2,332,674 26,213,586 5.68% September 26,845,572 2,041,198 28,370,751 5.68% October 29,646,753 2,801,181 31,331,076 5.68% November 37,298,673 7,651,920 39,417,724 5.68% December 39,484,055 2,185,382 41,727,264 5.68% Real Estate Excise Tax 1 & 2 Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals % January 219,352$ 219,352$ 251,030$ 14.44% February 381,613 162,261 407,050 6.67% March 588,896 207,283 1,009,202 71.37% April 780,860 191,964 1,240,201 58.83% May 1,005,087 224,227 1,528,062 52.03% June 1,248,349 243,262 1,830,143 46.61% July 1,653,074 404,724 2,138,601 29.37% August 1,929,331 276,257 2,514,349 30.32% September 2,197,100 267,769 2,863,311 30.32% October 2,416,963 219,864 3,149,842 30.32% November 2,630,341 213,377 3,427,920 30.32% December 2,800,000 169,659 3,649,024 30.32% *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. 2018 City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Revenue Summary-General Fund 2018 City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Revenue Summary-Real Estate Excise Tax 0 5,000,000 10,000,000 15,000,000 20,000,000 25,000,000 30,000,000 35,000,000 40,000,000 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC General Fund Current Year Budget Prior Year 0 500,000 1,000,000 1,500,000 2,000,000 2,500,000 3,000,000 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Real Estate Excise Tax 1 & 2 Current Year Budget Prior Year 4.3.a Packet Pg. 73 Attachment: August 2018 Monthly Financial Report (August 2018 Monthly Financial Report) 18 SALES TAX SUMMARY Wholesale Trade, $187,475 Communications, $161,560 Clothing and Accessories, $159,970 Accommodation, $26,364 Construction Trade, $1,149,091 Health & Personal Care, $159,280 Automotive Repair, $125,512 Amusement & Recreation, $58,621 Business Services, $491,373 Gasoline, $22,886 Retail Food Stores, $195,518 Retail Automotive, $1,134,651 Manufacturing, $70,235 Eating & Drinking, $660,965 Others, $38,496 Misc Retail, $768,156 Sales Tax Analysis By Category Current Period: August 2018 Year-to-Date Total $5,410,151 $5,325,287 $5,840,764 $6,741,838 $6,905,122 $7,395,114 $5,410,151 0 2,000,000 4,000,000 6,000,000 8,000,000 10,000,000 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 YTD 2018 Annual Sales Tax Revenue 4.3.a Packet Pg. 74 Attachment: August 2018 Monthly Financial Report (August 2018 Monthly Financial Report) 19 Sales and Use Tax Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals % January 552,482$ 552,482$ 585,948$ 6.06% February 1,249,207 696,725 1,321,958 5.82% March 1,777,304 528,097 1,886,310 6.13% April 2,272,493 495,189 2,452,585 7.92% May 2,906,618 634,125 3,194,085 9.89% June 3,468,607 561,989 3,866,411 11.47% July 4,058,559 589,952 4,614,605 13.70% August 4,707,320 648,761 5,410,151 14.93% September 5,334,689 627,369 6,131,190 14.93% October 5,989,537 654,848 6,883,811 14.93% November 6,670,224 680,687 7,666,128 14.93% December 7,275,000 604,776 8,361,201 14.93% Gas Utility Tax Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals % January 88,482$ 88,482$ 97,973$ 10.73% February 187,698 99,217 187,404 -0.16% March 267,256 79,558 268,029 0.29% April 335,144 67,888 323,194 -3.57% May 387,986 52,843 383,162 -1.24% June 424,966 36,979 415,620 -2.20% July 453,766 28,800 442,776 -2.42% August 477,013 23,247 466,145 -2.28% September 498,430 21,418 487,075 -2.28% October 523,180 24,749 511,260 -2.28% November 561,415 38,235 548,624 -2.28% December 620,200 58,785 606,070 -2.28% *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. 2018 City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Revenue Summary-Sales and Use Tax 2018 City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Revenue Summary-Gas Utility Tax 0 1,000,000 2,000,000 3,000,000 4,000,000 5,000,000 6,000,000 7,000,000 8,000,000 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Sales and Use Tax Current Year Budget Prior Year 0 100,000 200,000 300,000 400,000 500,000 600,000 700,000 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Gas Utility Tax Current Year Budget Prior Year 4.3.a Packet Pg. 75 Attachment: August 2018 Monthly Financial Report (August 2018 Monthly Financial Report) 20 Telephone Utility Tax Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals % January 101,864$ 101,864$ 94,392$ -7.34% February 202,129 100,265 183,702 -9.12% March 294,029 91,900 265,638 -9.66% April 390,095 96,066 350,982 -10.03% May 478,713 88,617 430,977 -9.97% June 568,042 89,329 512,099 -9.85% July 652,808 84,766 592,511 -9.24% August 740,812 88,004 670,052 -9.55% September 832,244 91,432 752,751 -9.55% October 920,171 87,927 832,279 -9.55% November 1,003,763 83,592 907,887 -9.55% December 1,093,200 89,437 988,781 -9.55% Electric Utility Tax Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals % January 171,906$ 171,906$ 169,967$ -1.13% February 353,028 181,122 380,238 7.71% March 518,242 165,214 535,565 3.34% April 683,645 165,403 714,751 4.55% May 824,846 141,201 864,247 4.78% June 940,385 115,539 989,943 5.27% July 1,050,933 110,549 1,098,482 4.52% August 1,157,071 106,138 1,213,435 4.87% September 1,262,180 105,109 1,323,664 4.87% October 1,372,403 110,223 1,439,256 4.87% November 1,490,337 117,934 1,562,935 4.87% December 1,611,600 121,263 1,690,105 4.87% *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. 2018 City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Revenue Summary-Telephone Utility Tax 2018 City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Revenue Summary-Electric Utility Tax 0 200,000 400,000 600,000 800,000 1,000,000 1,200,000 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Telephone Utility Tax Current Year Budget Prior Year 0 200,000 400,000 600,000 800,000 1,000,000 1,200,000 1,400,000 1,600,000 1,800,000 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Electric Utility Tax Current Year Budget Prior Year 4.3.a Packet Pg. 76 Attachment: August 2018 Monthly Financial Report (August 2018 Monthly Financial Report) 21 Meter Water Sales Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals % January 671,144$ 671,144$ 686,803$ 2.33% February 1,136,017 464,873 1,148,411 1.09% March 1,808,515 672,498 1,786,469 -1.22% April 2,250,797 442,282 2,228,766 -0.98% May 2,907,543 656,746 2,899,778 -0.27% June 3,420,955 513,413 3,395,518 -0.74% July 4,227,120 806,165 4,220,193 -0.16% August 4,933,718 706,598 4,933,652 0.00% September 5,902,426 968,708 5,902,347 0.00% October 6,565,192 662,766 6,565,104 0.00% November 7,332,394 767,202 7,332,296 0.00% December 7,804,500 472,106 7,804,396 0.00% Storm Water Sales Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals % January 293,128$ 293,128$ 287,956$ -1.13% February 924,642 631,514 913,794 7.71% March 1,217,367 292,725 1,201,441 3.34% April 1,476,942 259,575 1,457,402 4.55% May 1,769,842 292,900 1,745,509 4.78% June 2,030,237 260,395 2,001,084 5.27% July 2,324,515 294,278 2,286,682 -1.63% August 2,956,345 631,830 2,911,729 -1.51% September 3,248,569 292,224 3,199,543 -1.51% October 3,508,364 259,794 3,455,417 -1.51% November 3,801,321 292,958 3,743,953 -1.51% December 4,061,395 260,074 4,000,102 -1.51% *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. 2018 City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Revenue Summary-Meter Water Sales 2018 City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Revenue Summary-Storm Water Sales 0 1,000,000 2,000,000 3,000,000 4,000,000 5,000,000 6,000,000 7,000,000 8,000,000 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Meter Water Sales Current Year Budget Prior Year 0 500,000 1,000,000 1,500,000 2,000,000 2,500,000 3,000,000 3,500,000 4,000,000 4,500,000 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Storm Water Sales Current Year Budget Prior Year 4.3.a Packet Pg. 77 Attachment: August 2018 Monthly Financial Report (August 2018 Monthly Financial Report) 22 Unmeter Sewer Sales Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals % January 691,863$ 691,863$ 707,735$ 2.29% February 1,253,067 561,204 1,269,207 1.29% March 1,943,785 690,719 1,962,615 0.97% April 2,507,611 563,825 2,530,122 0.90% May 3,199,180 691,569 3,257,122 1.81% June 3,770,233 571,053 3,824,244 1.43% July 4,484,245 714,012 4,538,764 1.22% August 5,054,160 569,916 5,108,881 1.08% September 5,782,066 727,906 5,844,667 1.08% October 6,358,537 576,471 6,427,380 1.08% November 7,064,218 705,680 7,140,700 1.08% December 7,629,500 565,282 7,712,103 1.08% City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Revenue Summary-Unmeter Sewer Sales 2018 *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. 0 1,000,000 2,000,000 3,000,000 4,000,000 5,000,000 6,000,000 7,000,000 8,000,000 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Unmeter Sewer Sales Current Year Budget Prior Year 4.3.a Packet Pg. 78 Attachment: August 2018 Monthly Financial Report (August 2018 Monthly Financial Report) 23 General Fund Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals % January 5,436,298$ 5,436,298$ 4,000,420$ -26.41% February 7,967,688 2,531,391 7,074,254 -11.21% March 11,754,241 3,786,552 9,997,735 -14.94% April 15,713,351 3,959,110 13,366,102 -14.94% May 18,085,623 2,372,273 16,471,112 -8.93% June 21,982,527 3,896,904 20,515,429 -6.67% July 25,691,269 3,708,741 23,760,976 -7.51% August 29,708,087 4,016,818 26,305,714 -11.45% September 33,169,246 3,461,159 29,370,477 -11.45% October 36,032,535 2,863,289 31,905,842 -11.45% November 40,167,372 4,134,837 35,567,130 -11.45% December 44,334,660 4,167,288 39,257,151 -11.45% Non-Departmental Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals % January 2,936,502$ 2,936,502$ 1,916,589$ -34.73% February 3,199,198 262,696 2,811,392 -12.12% March 4,637,183 1,437,985 3,588,829 -22.61% April 6,109,820 1,472,637 4,704,813 -23.00% May 6,254,049 144,228 5,479,175 -12.39% June 7,756,163 1,502,115 7,214,671 -6.98% July 8,909,705 1,153,542 8,153,117 -8.49% August 10,239,438 1,329,733 8,273,085 -19.20% September 11,222,490 983,052 9,067,354 -19.20% October 11,660,691 438,201 9,421,404 -19.20% November 13,002,819 1,342,128 10,505,794 -19.20% December 14,260,547 1,257,728 11,521,991 -19.20% *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. 2018 City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report-General Fund 2018 City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report-Non-Departmental 0 5,000,000 10,000,000 15,000,000 20,000,000 25,000,000 30,000,000 35,000,000 40,000,000 45,000,000 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC General Fund Current Year Budget Prior Year 0 2,000,000 4,000,000 6,000,000 8,000,000 10,000,000 12,000,000 14,000,000 16,000,000 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Non-Departmental Current Year Budget Prior Year 4.3.a Packet Pg. 79 Attachment: August 2018 Monthly Financial Report (August 2018 Monthly Financial Report) 24 City Council Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals % January 39,156$ 39,156$ 20,137$ -48.57% February 81,707 42,551 43,001 -47.37% March 131,158 49,452 67,048 -48.88% April 177,465 46,306 93,044 -47.57% May 223,060 45,595 148,289 -33.52% June 282,118 59,058 211,018 -25.20% July 332,530 50,412 235,182 -29.27% August 383,904 51,375 309,376 -19.41% September 442,045 58,140 356,229 -19.41% October 480,175 38,130 386,957 -19.41% November 530,273 50,099 427,330 -19.41% December 580,919 50,646 468,144 -19.41% Office of Mayor Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals % January 24,264$ 24,264$ 23,355$ -3.75% February 49,615 25,351 47,920 -3.42% March 74,439 24,823 71,633 -3.77% April 98,806 24,367 97,145 -1.68% May 123,154 24,348 120,989 -1.76% June 147,440 24,286 144,437 -2.04% July 172,527 25,087 168,565 -2.30% August 197,868 25,341 192,272 -2.83% September 222,303 24,435 216,016 -2.83% October 247,077 24,774 240,089 -2.83% November 271,327 24,250 263,653 -2.83% December 297,088 25,761 288,685 -2.83% *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. 2018 City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report-City Council 2018 City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report-Office of Mayor 0 100,000 200,000 300,000 400,000 500,000 600,000 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC City Council Current Year Budget Prior Year 0.00 50,000.00 100,000.00 150,000.00 200,000.00 250,000.00 300,000.00 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Office of Mayor Current Year Budget Prior Year 4.3.a Packet Pg. 80 Attachment: August 2018 Monthly Financial Report (August 2018 Monthly Financial Report) 25 Human Resources Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals % January 36,684$ 36,684$ 36,984$ 0.82% February 77,607 40,923 73,258 -5.60% March 118,303 40,696 107,255 -9.34% April 153,693 35,390 140,435 -8.63% May 191,411 37,718 175,117 -8.51% June 229,956 38,546 205,285 -10.73% July 270,034 40,078 242,785 -10.09% August 308,510 38,475 279,002 -9.56% September 345,878 37,368 312,796 -9.56% October 385,381 39,503 348,521 -9.56% November 421,760 36,379 381,421 -9.56% December 477,314 55,554 431,661 -9.56% Municipal Court Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals % January 82,608$ 82,608$ 80,036$ -3.11% February 175,964 93,357 159,028 -9.62% March 269,619 93,655 241,304 -10.50% April 356,946 87,327 326,606 -8.50% May 446,138 89,192 413,053 -7.42% June 534,494 88,356 492,913 -7.78% July 623,552 89,059 570,967 -8.43% August 718,039 94,486 663,923 -7.54% September 811,352 93,313 750,204 -7.54% October 908,794 97,442 840,302 -7.54% November 1,003,801 95,007 928,149 -7.54% December 1,105,852 102,051 1,022,509 -7.54% *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. 2018 City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report-Human Resources 2018 City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report-Municipal Court 0 50,000 100,000 150,000 200,000 250,000 300,000 350,000 400,000 450,000 500,000 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Human Resources Current Year Budget Prior Year 0 200,000 400,000 600,000 800,000 1,000,000 1,200,000 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Municipal Court Current Year Budget Prior Year 4.3.a Packet Pg. 81 Attachment: August 2018 Monthly Financial Report (August 2018 Monthly Financial Report) 26 Community Services/Economic Development Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals % January 35,508$ 35,508$ 43,517$ 22.56% February 78,575 43,067 85,170 8.39% March 122,808 44,233 137,596 12.04% April 183,062 60,254 179,612 -1.88% May 221,918 38,856 227,250 2.40% June 264,589 42,671 269,991 2.04% July 310,671 46,082 315,110 1.43% August 361,283 50,612 372,264 3.04% September 410,573 49,289 423,052 3.04% October 462,272 51,699 476,323 3.04% November 518,901 56,629 534,673 3.04% December 590,461 71,560 608,408 3.04% City Clerk Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals % January 61,917$ 61,917$ 61,232$ -1.11% February 118,102 56,185 116,550 -1.31% March 174,765 56,663 172,403 -1.35% April 233,347 58,582 222,183 -4.78% May 287,099 53,752 277,663 -3.29% June 339,462 52,363 329,209 -3.02% July 395,577 56,115 380,418 -3.83% August 454,007 58,430 464,996 2.42% September 510,652 56,645 523,012 2.42% October 579,368 68,715 593,391 2.42% November 638,746 59,378 654,206 2.42% December 697,748 59,002 714,637 2.42% *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. 2018 City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report-Community Services/Economic Development 2018 City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report-City Clerk 0 100,000 200,000 300,000 400,000 500,000 600,000 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Community Services/Economic Development Current Year Budget Prior Year 0 100,000 200,000 300,000 400,000 500,000 600,000 700,000 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC City Clerk Current Year Budget Prior Year 4.3.a Packet Pg. 82 Attachment: August 2018 Monthly Financial Report (August 2018 Monthly Financial Report) 27 Technology Rental Fund Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals % January 143,632$ 143,632$ 144,135$ 0.35% February 300,838 157,206 204,078 -32.16% March 388,705 87,867 293,273 -24.55% April 473,229 84,524 351,042 -25.82% May 541,119 67,890 487,412 -9.93% June 613,434 72,315 615,817 0.39% July 720,259 106,826 663,312 -7.91% August 840,735 120,476 725,215 -13.74% September 955,896 115,161 824,553 -13.74% October 1,040,611 84,714 897,627 -13.74% November 1,136,112 95,501 980,006 -13.74% December 1,335,413 199,301 1,151,923 -13.74% Finance Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals % January 124,798$ 124,798$ 125,728$ 0.75% February 223,504 98,706 210,861 -5.66% March 319,397 95,892 296,541 -7.16% April 425,251 105,855 383,670 -9.78% May 523,182 97,931 467,718 -10.60% June 620,315 97,133 552,805 -10.88% July 716,459 96,144 637,823 -10.98% August 814,575 98,117 722,494 -11.30% September 925,150 110,574 820,569 -11.30% October 1,031,905 106,755 915,257 -11.30% November 1,131,680 99,774 1,003,753 -11.30% December 1,237,786 106,106 1,097,865 -11.30% *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. 2018 City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report-Technology Rental Fund 2018 City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report-Finance Prior Year amounts are from the Information Services Budget 0 200,000 400,000 600,000 800,000 1,000,000 1,200,000 1,400,000 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Technology Rental Fund Current Year Budget Prior Year 0 200,000 400,000 600,000 800,000 1,000,000 1,200,000 1,400,000 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Finance Current Year Budget Prior Year 4.3.a Packet Pg. 83 Attachment: August 2018 Monthly Financial Report (August 2018 Monthly Financial Report) 28 City Attorney Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals % January 70,623$ 70,623$ 46,119$ -34.70% February 141,247 70,623 136,648 -3.26% March 211,870 70,623 182,768 -13.74% April 282,493 70,623 252,179 -10.73% May 353,117 70,623 342,708 -2.95% June 423,740 70,623 411,032 -3.00% July 494,363 70,623 483,871 -2.12% August 564,986 70,623 552,195 -2.26% September 635,610 70,623 621,219 -2.26% October 706,233 70,623 690,244 -2.26% November 776,856 70,623 759,268 -2.26% December 847,480 70,623 828,292 -2.26% Police Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals % January 889,068$ 889,068$ 871,900$ -1.93% February 1,784,246 895,177 1,788,816 0.26% March 2,672,941 888,695 2,677,649 0.18% April 3,565,257 892,316 3,581,604 0.46% May 4,451,291 886,034 4,507,241 1.26% June 5,370,025 918,734 5,475,264 1.96% July 6,283,947 913,922 6,356,315 1.15% August 7,183,331 899,385 7,232,795 0.69% September 8,094,615 911,283 8,150,354 0.69% October 9,104,818 1,010,204 9,167,514 0.69% November 10,340,935 1,236,117 10,412,143 0.69% December 11,294,351 953,416 11,372,124 0.69% *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. 2018 City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report-City Attorney 2018 City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report-Police 0 100,000 200,000 300,000 400,000 500,000 600,000 700,000 800,000 900,000 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC City Attorney Current Year Budget Prior Year 0 1,000,000 2,000,000 3,000,000 4,000,000 5,000,000 6,000,000 7,000,000 8,000,000 9,000,000 10,000,000 11,000,000 12,000,000 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Police Current Year Budget Prior Year 4.3.a Packet Pg. 84 Attachment: August 2018 Monthly Financial Report (August 2018 Monthly Financial Report) 29 Development Services Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals % January 242,480$ 242,480$ 175,855$ -27.48% February 503,145 260,664 378,818 -24.71% March 782,715 279,570 591,734 -24.40% April 1,035,937 253,221 817,737 -21.06% May 1,313,615 277,679 1,046,070 -20.37% June 1,575,680 262,064 1,273,975 -19.15% July 1,845,523 269,844 1,515,745 -17.87% August 2,139,905 294,382 1,740,882 -18.65% September 2,409,284 269,379 1,960,031 -18.65% October 2,702,050 292,765 2,198,205 -18.65% November 3,005,916 303,866 2,445,410 -18.65% December 3,318,150 312,234 2,699,423 -18.65% Parks & Recreation Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals % January 293,333$ 293,333$ 258,749$ -11.79% February 599,800 306,468 530,383 -11.57% March 926,080 326,279 815,736 -11.92% April 1,249,317 323,237 1,159,777 -7.17% May 1,601,878 352,560 1,462,933 -8.67% June 1,953,226 351,348 1,773,743 -9.19% July 2,434,795 481,570 2,146,804 -11.83% August 2,983,135 548,340 2,536,505 -14.97% September 3,365,079 381,944 2,861,266 -14.97% October 3,703,882 338,803 3,149,344 -14.97% November 4,009,836 305,954 3,409,491 -14.97% December 4,411,972 402,136 3,751,420 -14.97% *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. 2018 City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report-Development Services 2018 City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report-Parks & Recreation 0 500,000 1,000,000 1,500,000 2,000,000 2,500,000 3,000,000 3,500,000 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Development Services Current Year Budget Prior Year 0 500,000 1,000,000 1,500,000 2,000,000 2,500,000 3,000,000 3,500,000 4,000,000 4,500,000 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Parks & Recreation Current Year Budget Prior Year 4.3.a Packet Pg. 85 Attachment: August 2018 Monthly Financial Report (August 2018 Monthly Financial Report) 30 Public Works Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals % January 42,035$ 42,035$ 42,488$ 1.08% February 85,654 43,620 84,736 -1.07% March 128,689 43,035 126,826 -1.45% April 171,578 42,889 168,659 -1.70% May 214,645 43,067 210,364 -1.99% June 257,701 43,056 251,929 -2.24% July 301,222 43,521 294,549 -2.22% August 343,666 42,444 336,142 -2.19% September 384,825 41,159 376,399 -2.19% October 426,961 42,136 417,613 -2.19% November 469,006 42,045 458,737 -2.19% December 514,048 45,042 502,794 -2.19% Facilities Maintenance Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals % January 164,689$ 164,689$ 133,250$ -19.09% February 332,420 167,731 273,490 -17.73% March 509,854 177,434 416,025 -18.40% April 679,027 169,173 558,614 -17.73% May 851,467 172,439 704,933 -17.21% June 1,002,627 151,161 829,817 -17.24% July 1,200,111 197,483 979,062 -18.42% August 1,359,814 159,704 1,136,010 -16.46% September 1,542,717 182,903 1,288,809 -16.46% October 1,711,435 168,718 1,429,759 -16.46% November 1,898,800 187,365 1,586,287 -16.46% December 2,100,163 201,363 1,754,508 -16.46% *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. 2018 City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report-Public Works 2018 City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report-Facilities Maintenance 0 100,000 200,000 300,000 400,000 500,000 600,000 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Public Works Current Year Budget Prior Year 0 200,000 400,000 600,000 800,000 1,000,000 1,200,000 1,400,000 1,600,000 1,800,000 2,000,000 2,200,000 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Facilities Maintenance Current Year Budget Prior Year 4.3.a Packet Pg. 86 Attachment: August 2018 Monthly Financial Report (August 2018 Monthly Financial Report) 31 Engineering Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals % January 200,507$ 200,507$ 164,481$ -17.97% February 398,504 197,996 334,182 -16.14% March 613,516 215,012 504,388 -17.79% April 833,268 219,752 680,024 -18.39% May 1,042,728 209,460 887,608 -14.88% June 1,264,837 222,109 1,079,339 -14.67% July 1,477,294 212,457 1,280,665 -13.31% August 1,702,007 224,713 1,493,771 -12.23% September 1,918,545 216,538 1,683,816 -12.23% October 2,140,781 222,236 1,878,862 -12.23% November 2,357,334 216,553 2,068,920 -12.23% December 2,600,781 243,447 2,282,582 -12.23% *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report-Engineering 2018 0 300,000 600,000 900,000 1,200,000 1,500,000 1,800,000 2,100,000 2,400,000 2,700,000 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Engineering Current Year Budget Prior Year 4.3.a Packet Pg. 87 Attachment: August 2018 Monthly Financial Report (August 2018 Monthly Financial Report) 32 INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO SUMMARY Years Agency/Investment Purchase to Par Market Maturity Coupon Issuer Type Price Maturity Value Value Date Rate FFCB Bonds 2,010,790 0.33 2,000,000 1,993,776 12/28/18 1.42% First Financial CD 3,000,000 0.40 3,000,000 3,000,000 01/24/19 2.34% FFCB Bonds 2,000,000 0.40 2,000,000 1,990,440 01/25/19 1.23% FICO Bonds 1,009,725 0.65 1,035,000 1,019,427 04/25/19 1.42% SCIP CD 2,500,000 0.76 2,500,000 2,500,000 06/04/19 2.65% FNMA Bonds 999,750 0.78 1,000,000 992,146 06/13/19 1.40% FHLB Bonds 1,000,400 0.80 1,000,000 991,849 06/20/19 1.40% FNMA Bonds 988,720 1.07 1,000,000 989,779 09/27/19 1.50% FHLMC Bonds 995,970 1.09 1,000,000 986,522 10/02/19 1.25% FNMA Bonds 1,994,310 1.16 2,000,000 1,970,508 10/28/19 1.35% FNMA Bonds 997,300 1.58 1,000,000 978,828 03/30/20 1.38% FHLB Bonds 2,003,780 1.58 2,000,000 1,963,640 03/30/20 1.45% FNMA Bonds 2,000,000 1.58 2,000,000 1,970,546 03/30/20 1.65% FHLMC Bonds 2,003,868 1.66 2,000,000 1,958,636 04/28/20 1.35% FNMA Bonds 1,000,000 1.83 1,000,000 977,457 06/30/20 1.38% FNMA Bonds 1,000,000 1.83 1,000,000 977,457 06/30/20 1.38% FHLB Bonds 3,000,000 1.87 3,000,000 2,920,482 07/13/20 1.20% RFCS Bonds 1,999,698 1.87 2,120,000 2,014,047 07/15/20 1.60% FHLB Bonds 2,000,000 1.92 2,000,000 1,966,048 07/30/20 1.75% FNMA Bonds 1,000,000 1.99 1,000,000 973,629 08/28/20 1.40% FNMA Bonds 1,000,000 1.99 1,000,000 973,629 08/28/20 1.40% FHLMC Bonds 999,500 2.33 1,000,000 977,838 12/30/20 1.75% FNMA Bonds 2,005,474 2.39 2,000,000 1,944,856 01/19/21 1.50% FM Bonds 2,000,000 2.59 2,000,000 1,952,358 04/01/21 1.87% FHLB Bonds 2,000,000 2.81 2,000,000 1,964,284 06/22/21 2.18% FFCB Bonds 968,940 3.04 1,000,000 968,637 09/13/21 1.73% FHLMC Bonds 2,000,000 3.24 2,000,000 1,951,296 11/26/21 2.13% FHLMC Bonds 999,400 3.33 1,000,000 971,807 12/30/21 2.00% FHLMC Bonds 1,000,000 3.49 1,000,000 975,957 02/25/22 2.15% TOTAL SECURITIES 46,477,626 1.7 46,655,000 45,815,879 Washington State Local Gov't Investment Pool 8,073,940 8,073,940 Demand 2.01% Snohomish County Local Gov't Investment Pool 6,438,884 6,438,884 Demand 1.76% TOTAL PORTFOLIO 61,167,823$ 60,328,702$ As of August 31, 2018 City of Edmonds Investment Portfolio Detail SCIP -CD, 5% First Financial - CD, 6% RFCS, 5% FHLMC, 17% FFCB, 11% FICO, 2% FHLB, 21%FM, 4% FNMA, 28% Issuer Diversification Checking, $3.2 , 5% State LGIP, $8.1 , 12% County LGIP, $6.4 , 10% CD's, $5.5 , 9% Bonds, $41.2 , 64% Cash and Investment Balances (in $ Millions) 4.3.a Packet Pg. 88 Attachment: August 2018 Monthly Financial Report (August 2018 Monthly Financial Report) 33 INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO SUMMARY $74,830 $163,214 $335,926 $423,816 $653,690 $608,918 $- $100,000 $200,000 $300,000 $400,000 $500,000 $600,000 $700,000 $800,000 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 YTD 2018 Annual Interest Income 0.0% 0.3%0.5%0.8%1.0%1.3%1.5%1.8%2.0% 2.3% 2.5% August October December February April June Edmonds Rate of Return Compared to Benchmark (Rolling 12 months) 6 Month Treasury Rate (Benchmark)City Blended Rate 0.00% 0.50% 1.00% 1.50% 2.00% 2.50% $- $5,000,000 $10,000,000 $15,000,000 $20,000,000 0-6 Mo 6-12 Mo 12-18 Mo 18-24 Mo 24-30 Mo 30-36 Mo 36-42 Mo Maturity Distribution and Rate of Return 4.3.a Packet Pg. 89 Attachment: August 2018 Monthly Financial Report (August 2018 Monthly Financial Report) 34 GENERAL FUND OVERVIEW 12/31/2017 6/30/2018 8/31/2018 Q2 YTD 001-General Fund 10,273,342$ 10,875,690$ 10,181,215$ 3,595,853$ (92,127)$ 009-Leoff-Medical Ins. Reserve 417,154 359,615 294,997 56,897 (122,157) 011-Risk Management Fund 902,700 913,902 918,536 4,785 15,836 012-Contingency Reserve Fund *5,447,144 5,465,041 5,207,841 (20,777) (239,303) 014-Historic Preservation Gift Fund 7,356 9,951 10,001 2,542 2,645 016-Building Maintenance 210,221 210,221 210,221 (0) - 017 - Marsh Restoration & Preservation - 306,850 306,850 300,025 306,850 018 - Edmonds Homelessness Response - 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 019 - Edmonds Opioid Response - 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 Total General Fund & Subfunds 17,257,917$ 18,641,270$ 17,629,661$ 4,439,326$ 371,744$ GENERAL FUND & SUBFUNDS FUND BALANCES CHANGE IN FUND BALANCES ---- ACTUAL -------- ACTUAL ---- *Fund 012 made interfund loans to fund 104 for $16,680 and to fund 112 for $268,230 in August 2018. $17.26 $18.64 $17.63 - 4 8 12 16 20 24 Dec 2017 June 2018 Aug 2018MillionsGeneralFund & Subfunds *Please note that these revenues and expenses occur within annual cycles. This Interim Report is not adjusted for accruals or those annual cycles. 4.3.a Packet Pg. 90 Attachment: August 2018 Monthly Financial Report (August 2018 Monthly Financial Report) 35 GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS OVERVIEW 12/31/2017 6/30/2018 8/31/2018 Q2 YTD General Fund & Subfunds 17,257,917$ 18,641,270$ 17,629,661$ 4,439,326$ 371,744$ Special Revenue 8,273,865 9,828,515 10,548,780 (323,709) 2,274,915 Debt Service 3,812 3,812 3,812 (0) - Capital Projects 1,544,084 1,910,156 2,145,644 313,063 601,560 Total Governmental Funds 27,079,678$ 30,383,753$ 30,327,897$ 4,428,679$ 3,248,219$ CHANGE IN FUND BALANCESGOVERNMENTAL FUNDS FUND BALANCES ---- ACTUAL -------- ACTUAL ---- $17.26 $18.64 $17.63 $8.27 $9.83 $10.55 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1.54 $1.91 $2.15 - 4 8 12 16 20 Dec 2017 June 2018 Aug 2018Millions General Fund & Subfunds Special Revenue Debt Service Capital Projects Governmental Fund Balances-By Fund GroupGovernmentalFund Balances-By Fund Group $27.08 $30.38 $30.33 - 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Dec 2017 June 2018 Aug 2018MillionsGovernmentalFund Balances -Combined *Please note that these revenues and expenses occur within annual cycles. This Interim Report is not adjusted for accruals or those annual cycles. 4.3.a Packet Pg. 91 Attachment: August 2018 Monthly Financial Report (August 2018 Monthly Financial Report) 36 SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS OVERVIEW 12/31/2017 6/30/2018 8/31/2018 Q2 YTD 104 - Drug Enforcement Fund *692$ (9,866)$ (12,987)$ (17,775)$ (13,679)$ 111 - Street Fund 1,102,078 986,820 1,004,760 54,857 (97,318) 112 - Combined Street Const/Improve *728,782 1,162,003 1,386,406 (643,632) 657,624 117 - Municipal Arts Acquis. Fund 533,208 543,112 577,664 5,928 44,456 118 - Memorial Street Tree 18,349 18,574 18,667 97 318 120 - Hotel/Motel Tax Revenue Fund 82,355 92,613 106,842 (471) 24,487 121 - Employee Parking Permit Fund 69,294 80,636 82,424 2,317 13,130 122 - Youth Scholarship Fund 15,348 14,657 14,244 (441) (1,104) 123 - Tourism Promotional Fund/Arts 59,886 70,755 74,773 1,154 14,887 125 - Real Estate Tax 2 1,901,003 2,375,978 2,532,128 92,137 631,125 126 - Real Estate Excise Tax 1 2,165,209 2,817,776 3,073,461 150,200 908,252 127 - Gifts Catalog Fund 265,666 301,924 307,236 7,219 41,570 130 - Cemetery Maintenance/Improvement 188,885 192,306 192,034 19,122 3,149 136 - Parks Trust Fund 155,907 157,842 158,642 827 2,735 137 - Cemetery Maintenance Trust Fund 938,109 958,680 967,186 10,508 29,077 138 - Sister City Commission 7,598 12,313 12,375 4,680 4,777 140 - Business Improvement Disrict 41,496 52,393 52,925 (10,435) 11,429 Total Special Revenue 8,273,865$ 9,828,515$ 10,548,780$ (323,709)$ 2,274,915$ GOVERNMENTAL SPECIAL REVENUE FUND BALANCES CHANGE IN FUND BALANCES ---- ACTUAL -------- ACTUAL ---- *Fund 012 made interfund loans to fund 104 for $16,680 and to fund 112 for $268,230 in August 2018. $8.27 $9.83 $10.55 - 3 6 9 12 15 Dec 2017 June 2018 Aug 2018Millions Special Revenue Special Revenue Funds *Please note that these revenues and expenses occur within annual cycles. This Interim Report is not adjusted for accruals or those annual cycles. 4.3.a Packet Pg. 92 Attachment: August 2018 Monthly Financial Report (August 2018 Monthly Financial Report) 37 ENTERPRISE FUNDS OVERVIEW 12/31/2017 6/30/2018 8/31/2018 Q2 YTD 421 - Water Utility Fund 19,153,889$ 18,561,330$ 18,142,504$ (1,114,350)$ (1,011,385)$ 422 - Storm Utility Fund 10,990,767 11,596,209 12,051,057 17,846 1,060,290 423 - Sewer/WWTP Utility Fund 44,666,806 45,940,706 45,360,886 265,921 694,080 424 - Bond Reserve Fund 843,960 843,964 843,965 2 5 411 - Combined Utility Operation - 72,418 94,096 32,291 94,096 Total Enterprise Funds 75,655,422$ 77,014,626$ 76,492,509$ (798,291)$ 837,087$ ENTERPRISE FUNDS FUND BALANCES CHANGE IN FUND ---- ACTUAL -------- ACTUAL ---- $94,096 $18,142,504 $12,051,057 $45,360,886 $843,965 $224,758 0 5,000,000 10,000,000 15,000,000 20,000,000 25,000,000 30,000,000 35,000,000 40,000,000 45,000,000 50,000,000 55,000,000 Combined Utility Water Storm Sewer/WWTP Bond Reserve Firemen's Pension Fund Enterprise and Agency Fund Balances as of August 31, 2018 *Please note that these revenues and expenses occur within annual cycles. This Interim Report is not adjusted for accruals or those annual cycles. 4.3.a Packet Pg. 93 Attachment: August 2018 Monthly Financial Report (August 2018 Monthly Financial Report) 38 SUMMARY OVERVIEW 12/31/2017 6/30/2018 8/31/2018 Q2 YTD Governmental Funds 27,079,678$ 30,383,753$ 30,327,897$ 4,428,679$ 3,248,219$ Enterprise Funds 75,655,422 77,014,626 76,492,509 (798,291) 837,087 Internal Services Fund 9,250,186 9,484,501 9,708,712 (50,723) 458,526 Agency Funds 226,480 236,045 224,758 29,250 (1,722) Total City-wide Total 112,211,766$ 117,118,925$ 116,753,876$ 3,608,916$ 4,542,110$ CITY-WIDE FUND BALANCES ---- ACTUAL ---- CHANGE IN FUND BALANCES ---- ACTUAL ---- $2,145,644 $3,812 $52,925 $12,375 $967,186 $158,642 $192,034 $307,236 $3,073,461 $2,532,128 $74,773 $14,244 $82,424 $106,842 $18,667 $577,664 $1,386,406 $1,004,760 $- $500,000 $1,000,000 $1,500,000 $2,000,000 $2,500,000 $3,000,000 $3,500,000 Parks Capital Construction Fund L.I.D. Fund Control Business Improvement District Sister City Commission Cemetery Maintenance Trust Fund Parks Trust Fund Cemetery Maintenance/Improvement Gifts Catalog Fund Real Estate Excise Tax 1, Parks Acq Real Estate Excise Tax 2 Tourism Promotional Fund/Arts Youth Scholarship Fund Employee Parking Permit Fund Hotel/Motel Tax Revenue Fund Memorial Street Fund Municipal Arts Acquis. Fund Combined Street Const/Improve Fund Street Fund Drug Enforcement Fund $ (29,667) Governmental Fund Balances (Excluding General Fund) as of August 31, 2018 *Please note that these revenues and expenses occur within annual cycles. This Interim Report is not adjusted for accruals or those annual cycles. 4.3.a Packet Pg. 94 Attachment: August 2018 Monthly Financial Report (August 2018 Monthly Financial Report) 39 INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS OVERVIEW 12/31/2017 6/30/2018 8/31/2018 Q2 YTD 511 - Equipment Rental Fund 8,996,077$ 9,209,823$ 9,330,841$ (46,284)$ 334,764$ 512 - Technology Rental Fund 254,109 274,678 377,872 (4,439) 123,763 Total Internal Service Funds 9,250,186$ 9,484,501$ 9,708,712$ (50,723)$ 458,526$ INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS FUND BALANCES CHANGE IN FUND BALANCES ---- ACTUAL -------- ACTUAL ---- $8,996,077 $9,209,823 $9,330,841 $254,109 $274,678 $377,872 - 2,000,000 4,000,000 6,000,000 8,000,000 10,000,000 12,000,000 Dec 2017 June 2018 Aug 2018 511 - Equipment Rental Fund 512 - Technology Rental Fund Internal Service Fund Balances *Please note that these revenues and expenses occur within annual cycles. This Interim Report is not adjusted for accruals or those annual cycles. 4.3.a Packet Pg. 95 Attachment: August 2018 Monthly Financial Report (August 2018 Monthly Financial Report) City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 10/16/2018 Critical Area Regulations for Wetlands Staff Lead: Kernen Lien Department: Planning Division Preparer: Kernen Lien Background/History The Planning Board heard an introduction to this limited code update at the June 13, 2018 meeting and held a public hearing on July 11, 2018 after which a recommendation was forwarded to the City Council. The day after the Planning Board's public hearing, the Department of Ecology issued updated guidance for wetland buffers. Staff informed the City Council of the updated wetland guidance at the July 24, 2018 Council meeting and confirmed that the City Council wished to update the wetland regulations with the most recent guidance. Staff informed the Planning Board about the updated wetland guidance at the July 25, 2018 Planning Board meeting at which time the Planning Board scheduled another public hearing on the updated wetland buffer guidance. The Board's new public hearing was then held on August 22, 2018. The City Council heard an introduction to the proposed wetland updates at the September 4, 2018 Council meeting and directed staff to prepare an ordinance for the consent agenda following a public hearing on September 25, 2018. Staff Recommendation Adopt the ordinance provided in Exhibit 1. Narrative The City of Edmonds completed a comprehensive review of its critical area ordinance (CAO) as required by the Growth Management Act in May 2016 with the adoption of Ordinance No. 4026. The wetland section of the CAO (ECDC 23.50) was developed from Ecology Publication No. 10-06-002 Wetlands & CAO Updates: Guidance for Small Cities. In June 2016, Ecology issued new guidance for wetlands under Publication No. 16-06-001 Wetland Guidance for CAO Updates (Exhibit 1). At the time, the City was also in the process of a comprehensive update of the Shoreline Master Program (SMP). The City Council desired to have to most current wetland regulations apply to shoreline jurisdiction, so certain wetland sections of the CAO were excepted from the SMP (which means they do not apply in shoreline jurisdiction). Within the SMP, wetland regulations consistent with Publication No. 16-06-001 were provided to replace the excepted sections. As a result the City of Edmonds has two versions of wetland regulations, one that applies within shoreline jurisdiction and a second that applies outside of shoreline jurisdiction. The City of Edmonds is required to complete a periodic review of the Shoreline Master Program by June 2019. In order to provide consistent regulations throughout the City, as part of the work program adopted by the City Council for the SMP periodic review, the City identified updating the COA wetland provisions excepted from the SMP to be consistent with Publication No. 16-06-001. 4.4 Packet Pg. 96 Following the July 11, 2018 Planning Board public hearing, the Department of Ecology issued updated guidance on wetland buffers. A FAQ sheet on the updated guidance and Ecology recommendations are included in Exhibit 2 and 3 respectively. The primary change between the 2016 and 2018 guidance is a regrouping of the habitat scores. Wetland buffers widths are determined by the habitat score assessed when the wetland determination is made. The 2016 wetland guidance had four potential buffer widths based on habitat score. The 2018 guidance provides three potential buffers widths based on habitat score. Below is a summary from the FAQ explaining why Ecology has issued the updated guidance: We made the changes based on public feedback and our own review of the reference wetland data used to calibrate the Washington State Wetland Rating System. We knew we needed to make modifications in the grouping of habitat scores. Low habitat function was previously represented by a score of 3 or 4 points and moderate habitat function by 5-7 points. Detailed analysis of the habitat scores for the 211 reference wetlands used to calibrate the rating system indicate that wetlands scoring 3, 4, or 5 points for habitat are similarly distributed to those that scored <19 in the 2004 version. Habitat scores of <19 points were considered low in the 2004 rating system. As a result, we need to adjust the wetland buffer break points in the 2014 habitat scores. The modified tables now group habitat scores of 3-5 into low habitat function and scores of 6-7 into moderate habitat function. Exhibit 4 contains the proposed amendment to the City’s wetland buffer regulations consistent with Publication No. 16-06-001 and the updated 2018 guidance. Two other minor revisions to the CAO are also proposed at this time. The first corrects a scriveners error in Section ECDC 23.50.040.G.3.d and the second deletes an allowed activity in section ECDC 23.50.020.E. The allowed activity related to development within the previously developed footprint for which specific regulations were included during the CAO update (see ECDC 23.50.040.J) and this section should have been deleted. Attachments: Exhibit 1: Critical Areas Ordinance Wetlands Update Exhibit 2: Wetland Guidance for CAO Updates Publication No. 16-06-001 Exhibit 3: FAQ - July 2018 Modified Habitat Score Ranges Exhibit 4: Ecology July 2018 Code Recommendations for Modified Habitat Scores Exhibit 5: Septebmer 4, 2018 City Council Minutes Excerpt Exhibit 6: September 25, 2018 City Council Minutes Excerpt 4.4 Packet Pg. 97 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE CRITICAL AREAS REGULATIONS CONTAINED IN EDMONDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE CHAPTER 23.50, ENTITLED “WETLANDS.” WHEREAS, the City of Edmonds is required to plan under RCW 36.70A.040; and WHEREAS, RCW 36.70A.130(1) requires City of Edmonds to take legislative action to review and, if needed, revise its comprehensive plan and development regulations, including its policies and regulations designating and conserving natural resource lands and designating and protecting critical areas to comply with the requirements in chapter 36.70A RCW (the Growth Management Act or GMA); and WHEREAS, the City of Edmonds completed a comprehensive review of its critical area regulations in 2016 with the adoption of Ordinance No. 4026 in May 2016; and WHEREAS, in June 2016 the Department of Ecology issued Publication No. 16-06-001 Wetland Guidance for CAO Updates which contained recommendations for wetland buffers different than the City of Edmonds adopted under Ordinance No. 4026; and WHEREAS, the Department of Ecology issued updated guidance to Publication No. 16-06- 001 Wetland Guidance for CAO Updates in July 2018; and WHEREAS, the City of Edmonds wishes to update its wetland regulations to conform with the most recent guidance from the Department of Ecology; and WHEREAS, the Planning Board reviewed proposed changes to the critical area wetland regulations over the course of three Planning Board meetings between June 13 and August 22, 2018; and WHEREAS, the Board's review included an August 22, 2018 public hearing; and WHEREAS, the Planning Board forwarded its recommended changes to the City's critical area wetland regulations to the City Council; and 4.4.a Packet Pg. 98 Attachment: Exhibit 1: Critical Areas Ordinance Wetlands Update (Critical Area Regulations for Wetlands) WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the draft updated critical area wetland regulation as recommended by the Planning Board at the September 4, 2018 Council; and WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing at the September 25, 2018 City Council meeting; and NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Section 23.50.010 of the Edmonds Community Development Code, entitled “Designation, rating and mapping – Wetlands,” is hereby amended to read as follows (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown in strike-through): 23.50.010 Designation, rating and mapping – Wetlands. A. Designating Wetlands. Wetlands are those areas, designated in accordance with the approved federal delineation manual and applicable regional supplements as set forth in WAC 173-22-035, that are inundated or saturated by surface or ground water at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation adapted for life in saturated soil conditions. All areas within the city of Edmonds meeting the wetland designation criteria, regardless of any formal identification, are hereby designated critical areas and are subject to the provisions of this title. B. Wetland Ratings. Wetlands shall be rated according to the Washington Department of Ecology wetland rating system, as set forth in the Washington State Wetland Rating System for Western Washington: 2014 Update (Ecology Publication #14-06-029, or as revised and approved by Ecology), which contains the definitions and methods for determining whether the criteria below are met. Wetlands shall be rated according to the Washington State Department of Ecology wetland rating system found in the 2014 Washington State Wetland Rating System for Western Washington Ecology Publication No. 14-06-029. Consistent with the wetland rating system criteria and parameters within this document, wetlands that are rated for ecological functions with highest point totals (23 points or higher) perform ecological functions associated 4.4.a Packet Pg. 99 Attachment: Exhibit 1: Critical Areas Ordinance Wetlands Update (Critical Area Regulations for Wetlands) with water flow, water quality and habitat at highest levels, whereas wetlands that are rated with lowest point totals (15 points or lower) perform ecological functions at lowest levels. Wetlands that are rated with points between 16 and 22 points perform ecological functions at moderate to high levels. 1. Category I. Category I wetlands are: (1) relatively undisturbed estuarine wetlands larger than 1 acre; (2) wetlands of high conservation value that are identified by scientists of the Washington Natural Heritage Program/DNR; (3) bogs; (4) mature and old-growth forested wetlands larger than 1 acre; (5) wetlands in coastal lagoons; (6) interdunal wetlands that score 8 or 9 habitat points and are larger than 1 acre; and (7) wetlands that perform many functions well (scoring 23 points or more). These wetlands: (1) represent unique or rare wetland types; (2) are more sensitive to disturbance than most wetlands; (3) are relatively undisturbed and contain ecological attributes that are impossible to replace within a human lifetime; or (4) provide a high level of functions. 2. Category II. Category II wetlands are: (1) estuarine wetlands smaller than 1 acre, or disturbed estuarine wetlands larger than 1 acre; (2) interdunal wetlands larger than 1 acre or those found in a mosaic of wetlands; or (3) wetlands with a moderately high level of functions (scoring between 20 and 22 points). 3. Category III. Category III wetlands are: (1) wetlands with a moderate level of functions (scoring between 16 and 19 points); (2) can often be adequately replaced with a well-planned mitigation project; and (3) interdunal wetlands between 0.1 and 1 acre. Wetlands scoring between 16 and 19 points generally have been disturbed in some ways and are often less diverse or more isolated from other natural resources in the landscape than Category II wetlands. 4. Category IV. Category IV wetlands have the lowest levels of functions (scoring fewer than 16 points) and are often heavily disturbed. These are wetlands that we should be able to replace, or in some cases to improve. However, experience has shown that replacement cannot be guaranteed in any specific case. These wetlands may provide some important functions, and should be protected to some degree. 4.4.a Packet Pg. 100 Attachment: Exhibit 1: Critical Areas Ordinance Wetlands Update (Critical Area Regulations for Wetlands) 5. Illegal modifications. Wetland rating categories shall not change due to illegal modifications made by the applicant or with the applicant’s knowledge. 1. The City of Edmonds Wetland Rating Categories: a. Category I Wetlands. Category I wetlands are those that represent a unique or rare wetland type; are more sensitive to disturbance than most wetlands; are relatively undisturbed and contain ecological attributes that are impossible to replace within a human lifetime; or provide a high level of function. The following types of wetlands are Category I: i. Relatively undisturbed estuarine wetlands larger than one acre; ii. Wetlands of high conservation value that are identified by scientists of the Washington Natural Heritage Program/DNR; iii. Bogs; iv. Wetlands with mature and old-growth forests larger than one acre; v. Wetlands in coastal lagoons; vi. Wetlands that perform functions at high levels as indicated by a score of 23 points or more based on functions. b. Category II Wetlands. Category II wetlands are those that are difficult, though not impossible, to replace, and provide high levels of some functions. The following types of wetlands are Category II: i. Estuarine wetlands smaller than one acre, or disturbed estuarine wetlands larger than one acre; ii. Wetlands with a moderately high level of functions as indicated by a score of 20 to 22 points based on functions. c. Category III Wetlands. Category III wetlands are wetlands with a moderate level of functions as indicated by a score of 16 to 19 points based on functions. 4.4.a Packet Pg. 101 Attachment: Exhibit 1: Critical Areas Ordinance Wetlands Update (Critical Area Regulations for Wetlands) d. Category IV Wetlands. Category IV wetlands are those with the lowest levels of functions as indicated by scores below 16 points based on functions. All wetlands should be rated consistent with the 2014 Washington State Wetland Rating System for Western Washington using the 2014 Western Washington Rating Form. C. Date of Wetland Rating. Wetland rating categories shall be applied as the wetland exists on the date of adoption of the rating system by the local government, as the wetland naturally changes thereafter, or as the wetland changes in accordance with permitted activities. Wetland rating categories shall not change due to illegal modifications. D. Mapping. The approximate location and extent of wetlands are shown on the city of Edmonds critical areas inventory. In addition, the National Wetlands Inventory and Soil Maps produced by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Resources Conservation Service may be useful in helping to identify potential wetland areas. The inventory and cited resources are to be used as a guide for the city of Edmonds, project applicants, and/or property owners, and may be continuously updated as new critical areas are identified. They are a reference and do not provide a final critical area designation. E. Delineation. The exact location of a wetland’s boundary shall be determined through the performance of a field investigation by a qualified professional wetland scientist applying the approved federal wetland delineation manual and applicable regional supplements. Wetland delineations are valid for five years; after such date the city shall determine whether a revision or additional assessment is necessary. F. Lake Ballinger. Lake Ballinger is designated on the U.S. National Wetlands Inventory as a lacustrine (lake) environment and should not be delineated as a wetland in its entirety. Lake fringe wetlands existing along the periphery of Lake Ballinger shall be identified according to specific criteria provided in this section. Consistent with guidance for delineating lake fringe wetlands provided in these resources, the existence of jurisdictional wetlands along Lake Ballinger shorelines shall be largely based upon the presence of persistent emergent vegetation in shoreline areas less than 6.6 feet in depth. Provisions for protection of Lake Ballinger shorelines 4.4.a Packet Pg. 102 Attachment: Exhibit 1: Critical Areas Ordinance Wetlands Update (Critical Area Regulations for Wetlands) not meeting criteria for jurisdictional wetlands are provided in the city of Edmonds shoreline master program. G. Edmonds Marsh. The city has a 23-acre Edmonds marsh wetland which in addition to a wildlife habitat and natural resource sanctuary is also classified by the state as a priority habitat. H. Other Significant Wetlands. 1. Good Hope Pond. 2. Mouth of Shell Creek. [Ord. 4026 § 1 (Att. A), 2016; Ord. 3527 § 2, 2004]. Section 2. Section 23.50.020 of the Edmonds Community Development Code, entitled “Allowed activities - Wetlands,” is hereby amended to read as follows (deleted text is shown in strike-through): 23.50.020 Allowed activities – Wetlands. The activities listed below are allowed in wetlands in addition to those activities listed in, and consistent with, the provisions established in ECDC 23.40.220, and do not require submission of a critical areas report, except where such activities result in a loss to the functions and values of a wetland or wetland buffer. These activities include: A. Conservation or preservation of soil, water, vegetation, fish, shellfish, and other wildlife that does not entail changing the structure or functions of the existing wetland. B. The harvesting of wild crops in a manner that is not injurious to natural reproduction of such crops and provided the harvesting does not require tilling of soil, planting of crops, chemical applications, or alteration of the wetland by changing existing topography, water conditions, or water sources. C. Drilling for utilities under a wetland; provided, that the drilling does not interrupt the ground water connection to the wetland or percolation of surface water down through the soil column. Specific studies by a hydrologist are necessary to determine whether the ground water 4.4.a Packet Pg. 103 Attachment: Exhibit 1: Critical Areas Ordinance Wetlands Update (Critical Area Regulations for Wetlands) connection to the wetland or percolation of surface water down through the soil column could be disturbed. D. Enhancement of a wetland through the removal of nonnative invasive species. Weeding shall be restricted to hand removal and weed material shall be removed from the site. Bare areas that remain after weed removal shall be revegetated with native shrubs and trees at natural densities. Some hand seeding may also be done over the bare areas with native herbs. Noxious weeds listed on the Washington State Noxious Weed Control Board list must be handled and disposed of according to a noxious weed control plan appropriate to that species. E. Permitted alteration to a legally constructed structure existing within a wetland or wetland buffer that does not increase the footprint of development or impervious surfacing or increase the impact to a wetland or wetland buffer. Section 3. Section 23.50.030 of the Edmonds Community Development Code, entitled “Development standards - Wetlands,” is hereby amended to read as follows (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown in strike-through): 23.50.040 Development standards – Wetlands. A. Activities may only be permitted in a wetland buffer if the applicant can show that the proposed activity will not degrade the functions and functional performance of the wetland and other critical areas. B. Activities and uses shall be prohibited in wetlands and wetland buffers, except as provided for in this title. C. Category I Wetlands. Activities and uses shall be prohibited from Category I wetlands, except as provided for in the public agency and utility exception, reasonable use exception, and variance sections of this title. D. Category II Wetlands. With respect to activities proposed in Category II wetlands, the following standards shall apply: 4.4.a Packet Pg. 104 Attachment: Exhibit 1: Critical Areas Ordinance Wetlands Update (Critical Area Regulations for Wetlands) 1. Water-dependent activities may be allowed where there are no practicable alternatives that would have a less adverse impact on the wetland, its buffers and other critical areas. 2. Where non-water-dependent activities are proposed, it shall be presumed that alternative locations are available, and activities and uses shall be prohibited, unless the applicant demonstrates that: a. The basic project purpose cannot be accomplished as proposed and successfully avoid, or result in less adverse impact on, a wetland on another site or sites in the general region; and b. All alternative designs of the project as proposed, such as a reduction in the size, scope, configuration, or density of the project, would not avoid or result in less of an adverse impact on a wetland or its buffer. E. Category III and IV Wetlands. Activities and uses that result in unavoidable and necessary impacts may be permitted in Category III and IV wetlands and associated buffers in accordance with an approved critical areas report and mitigation plan. F. Wetland Buffers. 1. Buffer Requirements. The following buffer widths have been established in accordance with the best available science. They are based on the category of wetland and the habitat score as determined by a qualified wetland professional using the Washington State Wetland Rating System for Western Washington: 2014 Update (Ecology Publication #14-06-029, or as revised and approved by Ecology). The adjacent land use intensity is assumed to be high. a. For wetlands that score 6 points or more for habitat function, the buffers in subsection F.1.e can be used if both of the following criteria are met: i. A relatively undisturbed, vegetated corridor at least 100 feet wide is protected between the wetland and any other Priority Habitats as defined by the Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife. The corridor must be protected for the entire distance between the wetland and the Priority Habitat by some type of legal protection such as a conservation easement. 4.4.a Packet Pg. 105 Attachment: Exhibit 1: Critical Areas Ordinance Wetlands Update (Critical Area Regulations for Wetlands) Presence or absence of a nearby habitat must be confirmed by a qualified biologist. If no option for providing a corridor is available, subsection F.1.e may be used with the required measures in subsection F.1.f alone. ii. The measures in subsection F.1.f are implemented, where applicable, to minimize the impacts of the adjacent land uses. b. For wetlands that score 3-5 habitat points, only the measures in subsection F.1.f are required for the use of subsection F.1.e c. If an applicant chooses not to apply the mitigation measures in subsection F.1.f, or is unable to provide a protected corridor where available, then subsection F.1.g must be used. d. The buffer widths in subsection F.1.e and subsection F.1.g assume that the buffer is vegetated with a native plant community appropriate for the ecoregion. If the existing buffer is unvegetated, sparsely vegetated, or vegetated with invasive species that do not perform needed functions, the buffer should either be planted to create the appropriate plant community or the buffer should be widened to ensure that adequate functions of the buffer are provided. e. Wetland Buffer Requirements for Western Washington if subsection F.1.f is Implemented and Corridor Provided Buffer Width (in Feet) Based on Habitat Score Wetland Category Habitat Score: 3-5 Habitat Score: 6-7 Habitat Score: 8-9 Category I: Based on total score 75 110 225 Category I: Bogs and wetlands of high conservation value 190 225 4.4.a Packet Pg. 106 Attachment: Exhibit 1: Critical Areas Ordinance Wetlands Update (Critical Area Regulations for Wetlands) Category I: Forested 75 110 225 Category I: Interdunal 225 (buffer width not based on habitat scores) Category I: Estuarine and Coastal Lagoons 150 (buffer width not based on habitat scores) Category II: Based on score 75 110 225 Category II: Interdunal wetlands 110 (buffer width not based on habitat scores) Category II: Estuarine and Coastal Lagoons 110 (buffer width not based on habitat scores) Category III (all) 60 110 225 Category IV (all) 40 f. Required Measures to Minimize Impacts to Wetlands (All measures are required if applicable to a specific proposal). Disturbance Required Measures to Minimize Impacts Lights • Direct lights away from wetland 4.4.a Packet Pg. 107 Attachment: Exhibit 1: Critical Areas Ordinance Wetlands Update (Critical Area Regulations for Wetlands) Noise • Locate activity that generates noise away from wetland • If warranted, enhance existing buffer with native vegetation planting adjacent to noise source • For activities that generate relatively continuous, potentially disruptive noise, such as certain heavy industry or mining, establish an additional 10-foot heavily vegetated buffer strip immediately adjacent to the outter wetland buffer Toxic runoff • Route all new, untreated runoff away from wetland while ensuring wetland is not dewatered • Establish covenants limiting use of pesticides within 150 feet of wetland • Apply integrated pest management Stormwater runoff • Retrofit stormwater detention and treatment for roads and existing adjacent development • Prevent channelized flow from lawns that directly enters the buffer • Use low intensity development techniques (for more information see stormwater ordinance and manual) Change in water regime • Infiltrate or treat, detain, and disperse into buffer new runoff from impervious surfaces and new lawns 4.4.a Packet Pg. 108 Attachment: Exhibit 1: Critical Areas Ordinance Wetlands Update (Critical Area Regulations for Wetlands) Pets and human disturbance • Use privacy fencing OR plant dense vegetation to delineate buffer edge and to discourage disturbance using vegetation appropriate for ecoregion • Place wetland and its buffer in a separate tract to protect with a conservation easement Dust • Use best management practices to control dust g. Wetland Buffer Requirements for Western Washington if subsection F.1.f is NOT Implemented or Corridor NOT provided Buffer Width (in Feet) Based on Habitat Score Wetland Category Habitat Score: 3-5 Habitat Score: 6-7 Habitat Score: 8-9 Category I: Based on total score 100 150 300 Category I: Bogs and wetlands of high conservation value 250 300 Category I: Forested 100 150 300 Category I: Interdunal 300 (buffer width not based on habitat scores) 4.4.a Packet Pg. 109 Attachment: Exhibit 1: Critical Areas Ordinance Wetlands Update (Critical Area Regulations for Wetlands) Category I: Estuarine and Coastal Lagoon 200 (buffer width not based on habitat scores) Category II: Based on score 100 150 300 Category II: Interdunal wetlands 150 (buffer width not based on habitat scores) Category II: Estuarine and Coastal Lagoons 150 (buffer width not based on habitat scores) Category III (all) 80 150 300 Category IV (all) 50 1. Standard Buffer Widths. The standard buffer widths in subsection (F)(1)(d) of this section have been established in accordance with best available science. The buffers are based on the category of wetland and the habitat score as determined by a qualified wetland professional using the Washington State Wetland Rating System for Western Washington. a. The use of the standard buffer widths requires the implementation of the measures in subsection (F)(2) of this section, where applicable, to minimize the impacts of the adjacent land uses. b. If an applicant chooses not to apply the mitigation measures in subsection (F)(2) of this section, then a 33 percent increase in the width of all buffers is required. c. The standard buffer widths presume the existence of a relatively intact native vegetation community in the buffer zone adequate to protect the wetland functions and values 4.4.a Packet Pg. 110 Attachment: Exhibit 1: Critical Areas Ordinance Wetlands Update (Critical Area Regulations for Wetlands) at the time of the proposed activity. If the buffer is composed of nonnative vegetation, lawn, or bare ground, then, at the discretion of the director, the buffer width may be increased or an applicant may be required to either develop and implement a wetland buffer enhancement plan to maintain the standard width or widen the standard width to ensure that adequate functions of the buffer are provided. d. Standard Wetland Buffer Widths Table. Wetland Category Minimum Buffer Width (Wetland scores 3 – 4 habitat points) Buffer Width (Wetland scores 5 habitat points) Buffer Width (Wetland scores 6 – 7 habitat points) Buffer Width (Wetland scores 8 – 9 habitat points) Category I: Based on total score 75 ft 105 ft 165 ft 225 ft Category I: Bogs and wetlands of high conservation value 190 ft 190 ft 190 ft 225 ft Category I: Forested 75 ft 105 ft 165 ft 225 ft Category I: Estuarine 150 ft 150 ft 150 ft 150 ft Category II: 75 ft 105 ft 165 ft 225 ft 4.4.a Packet Pg. 111 Attachment: Exhibit 1: Critical Areas Ordinance Wetlands Update (Critical Area Regulations for Wetlands) Wetland Category Minimum Buffer Width (Wetland scores 3 – 4 habitat points) Buffer Width (Wetland scores 5 habitat points) Buffer Width (Wetland scores 6 – 7 habitat points) Buffer Width (Wetland scores 8 – 9 habitat points) Based on score Category III (all) 60 ft 105 ft 165 ft 165 ft Category IV (all) 40 ft 40 ft 40 ft 40 ft 2. Required Measures to Minimize Impacts to Wetlands. The standard wetland buffer widths in subsection (F)(1)(d) of this section assumes implementation of the following measures, where applicable to a specific proposal: Disturbance Required Measures to Minimize Impacts Lights • Direct lights away from wetland Noise • Locate activity that generates noise away from wetland • If warranted, enhance existing buffer with native vegetation plantings adjacent to noise source • For activities that generate relatively continuous, potentially disruptive noise, such as certain heavy industry or mining, establish an additional 10 ft heavily vegetated buffer strip immediately adjacent to the outer wetland buffer Toxic runoff • Route all new, untreated runoff away from wetland while ensuring wetland is not dewatered 4.4.a Packet Pg. 112 Attachment: Exhibit 1: Critical Areas Ordinance Wetlands Update (Critical Area Regulations for Wetlands) Disturbance Required Measures to Minimize Impacts • Establish covenants limiting use of pesticides within 150 ft of wetland • Apply integrated pest management Storm water runoff • Retrofit storm water detention and treatment for roads and existing adjacent development • Prevent channelized flow from lawns that directly enters the buffer • Use low impact development techniques (per Puget Sound Action Team publication on LID techniques) Change in water regime • Infiltrate or treat, detain, and disperse into buffer new runoff from impervious surfaces and new lawns Pets and human disturbance • Use privacy fencing OR plant dense vegetation to delineate buffer edge and to discourage disturbance using vegetation appropriate for the ecoregion • Place wetland and its buffer in a separate tract or protect with a conservation easement Dust • Use best management practices to control dust Disruption of corridors or connections • Maintain connections to off-site areas that are undisturbed • Restore corridors or connections to off-site habitats by replanting 3. Increased Wetland Buffer Widths. The director shall require increased buffer widths in accordance with the recommendations of an experienced, qualified professional wetland 4.4.a Packet Pg. 113 Attachment: Exhibit 1: Critical Areas Ordinance Wetlands Update (Critical Area Regulations for Wetlands) scientist and the best available science on a case-by-case basis when a larger buffer is necessary to protect wetland functions and values based on site-specific characteristics. This determination shall be based on one or more of the following criteria: a. A larger buffer is needed to protect other critical areas; b. The buffer or adjacent uplands has a slope greater than 15 percent or is susceptible to erosion and standard erosion control measures will not prevent adverse impacts to the wetland; or c. The buffer area has minimal vegetative cover. In lieu of increasing the buffer width where existing buffer vegetation is inadequate to protect the wetland functions and values, development and implementation of a wetland buffer enhancement plan in accordance with this subsection (F)(3) may substitute. d. The wetland and/or buffer is occupied by a federally listed threatened or endangered species, a bald eagle nest, a great blue heron rookery, or a species of local importance; and it is determined by the director that an increased buffer width is necessary to protect the species. 4. Measurement of Wetland Buffers. All buffers shall be measured from the wetland boundary as surveyed in the field. The buffer for a wetland created, restored, or enhanced as compensation for approved wetland alterations shall be the same as the buffer required for the category of the created, restored, or enhanced wetland. 5. Buffer Consistency. All mitigation sites shall have buffers consistent with the buffer requirements of this chapter. 6. Buffer Maintenance. Except as otherwise specified or allowed in accordance with this title, wetland buffers shall be retained in an undisturbed or enhanced condition. Removal of invasive nonnative weeds is required for the duration of the mitigation bond. G. Wetland Buffer Modifications and Uses. 4.4.a Packet Pg. 114 Attachment: Exhibit 1: Critical Areas Ordinance Wetlands Update (Critical Area Regulations for Wetlands) 1. Where wetland or buffer alterations are permitted by the city of Edmonds, the applicant shall mitigate impacts to achieve no net loss of wetland acreage and functions consistent with ECDC 23.50.050 and other applicable provisions of this title. 2. At the discretion of the director, standard wetland buffers may be averaged or reduced when consistent with all criteria in this subsection (G). Wetland buffer averaging with enhancement shall be preferred over wetland buffer reduction with enhancement. Wetland buffer reduction shall only be approved by the director when buffer averaging cannot be accomplished on site. 3. Wetland Buffer Width Averaging with Buffer Enhancement. The director may allow modification of a standard wetland buffer width in accordance with an approved critical areas report and the best available science on a case-by-case basis by averaging buffer widths. Any allowance for averaging buffer widths shall only be granted concomitant to the development and implementation of a wetland buffer enhancement plan for areas of buffer degradation. Only those portions of a wetland buffer existing within the project area or subject parcel shall be considered the total standard buffer for buffer averaging. Averaging of buffer widths may only be allowed where a qualified professional wetland scientist demonstrates that: a. The buffer averaging and enhancement plan provides evidence that wetland functions and values will be: i. Increased or retained through plan implementation for those wetlands where existing buffer vegetation is generally intact; or ii. Increased through plan implementation for those wetlands where existing buffer vegetation is inadequate to protect the functions and values of the wetland; b. The wetland contains variations in sensitivity due to existing physical characteristics or the character of the buffer varies in slope, soils, or vegetation, and the wetland would benefit from a wider buffer in places and would not be adversely impacted by a narrower buffer in other places; 4.4.a Packet Pg. 115 Attachment: Exhibit 1: Critical Areas Ordinance Wetlands Update (Critical Area Regulations for Wetlands) c. The total area contained in the buffer area, or the total buffer area existing on a subject parcel for wetlands extending off site, after averaging is no less than that which would be contained within a standard buffer; and d. The buffer width at any single location is not reduced by more than 25 percent to less than 50 percent of the standard buffer width. 4. Buffer Width Reductions through Buffer Enhancement. At the discretion of the director, and only when buffer averaging cannot be accomplished on site, wetland buffer width reductions (or approval of standard buffer widths for wetlands where existing buffer conditions require increased buffer widths) may be granted concomitant to the development and implementation of a wetland buffer enhancement plan for Category III and IV wetlands only. Approval of a wetland buffer enhancement plan shall, at the discretion of the director, allow for wetland buffer width reductions by no more than 25 percent of the standard width; provided, that: a. The plan provides evidence that wetland functions and values will be: i. Increased or retained through plan implementation for those wetlands where existing buffer vegetation is generally intact; or ii. Increased through plan implementation for those wetlands where existing buffer vegetation is inadequate to protect the functions and values of the wetland; b. The plan documents existing native plant densities and provides for increases in buffer native plant densities to no less than three feet on center for shrubs and eight feet on center for trees; c. The plan requires monitoring and maintenance to ensure success in accordance with ECDC 23.40.130(D); and d. The plan specifically documents methodology and provides performance standards including but not limited to: i. Percent vegetative cover; ii. Percent invasive species cover; 4.4.a Packet Pg. 116 Attachment: Exhibit 1: Critical Areas Ordinance Wetlands Update (Critical Area Regulations for Wetlands) iii. Species richness; and iv. Amount of large woody debris. 5. Buffer Uses. The following uses may be permitted within a wetland buffer in accordance with the review procedures of this title; provided, they are not prohibited by any other applicable law and they are conducted in a manner so as to minimize impacts to the buffer and adjacent wetland: a. All activities allowed by ECDC 23.50.020, Allowed activities – Wetlands. b. Conservation and Restoration Activities. Conservation or restoration activities aimed at protecting the soil, water, vegetation, or wildlife. c. Passive Recreation. Passive recreation facilities designed and in accordance with an approved critical area report, including: i. Walkways and trails; provided, that those pathways are generally constructed with a surface that does not interfere with substrate permeability, are generally located only in the outer 25 percent of wetland buffers, and are located to avoid removal of significant trees. Where existing legally established development has reduced the width of the wetland buffer, trails may be placed in the outer 25 percent of the remaining wetland buffer. The trail shall be no more than five feet in width and for pedestrian use only. Raised boardwalks utilizing nontreated pilings may be acceptable. The director may allow trails within the inner 25 percent of wetland buffers when required to provide access to wildlife viewing structures, fishing access areas, or connections to other trail facilities; ii. Wildlife viewing structures; and iii. Fishing access areas down to the water’s edge that shall be no larger than six feet. d. Storm Water Management Facilities. Storm water management facilities, limited to outfalls, pipes and conveyance systems, storm water dispersion outfalls and bioswales, may be allowed within the outer 25 percent of a standard or modified buffer for Category III or IV wetlands only; provided, that: 4.4.a Packet Pg. 117 Attachment: Exhibit 1: Critical Areas Ordinance Wetlands Update (Critical Area Regulations for Wetlands) i. No other location is feasible; and ii. The location and function of such facilities will not degrade the functions or values of the wetland. iii. Storm water management facilities are not allowed in buffers of Category I or II wetlands. iv. Projects shall also comply with all applicable requirements in Chapter 18.30 ECDC, Storm Water Management, including Minimum Requirement No. 8, Wetland Protection. H. Signs and Fencing of Wetlands. 1. Temporary Markers. The outer perimeter of the wetland or buffer and the limits of those areas to be disturbed pursuant to an approved permit or authorization shall be marked in the field in such a way as to ensure that no unauthorized intrusion will occur and is subject to inspection by the director prior to the commencement of permitted activities. The director may require the use of fencing to protect wetlands from disturbance and intrusion. Temporary marking shall be maintained throughout construction and shall not be removed until permanent signs, if required, are in place. 2. Permanent Signs. As a condition of any permit or authorization issued pursuant to this chapter, the director may require the applicant to install permanent signs along the boundary of a wetland or buffer. a. Permanent signs shall be made of an enamel-coated metal face and attached to a metal post or another nontreated material of equal durability. Signs must be posted at an interval of one per lot or every 50 feet, whichever is less, and must be maintained by the property owner in perpetuity. The sign shall be worded as follows or with alternative language approved by the director: Protected Wetland Area Do Not Disturb Contact the City of Edmonds 4.4.a Packet Pg. 118 Attachment: Exhibit 1: Critical Areas Ordinance Wetlands Update (Critical Area Regulations for Wetlands) Regarding Uses and Restrictions b. The provisions of subsection (H)(2)(a) of this section may be modified as necessary to assure protection of sensitive features or wildlife. 3. Permanent Fencing. Permanent fencing shall be required at the outer edge of the critical area buffer under the following circumstances; provided, that the director may waive this requirement: a. As part of any development proposal for single-family plats, single-family short plats, multifamily, mixed use, and commercial development where the director determines that such fencing is necessary to protect the functions of the critical area; provided, that breaks in permanent fencing may be allowed for access to permitted buffer uses (subsection (G)(5) of this section); b. As part of development proposals for parks where the adjacent proposed use is active recreation and the director determines that such fencing is necessary to protect the functions of the critical area; c. When buffer averaging is employed as part of a development proposal; d. When buffer reductions are employed as part of a development proposal; or e. At the director’s discretion to protect the values and functions of a critical area. I. Additions to Structures Existing within Wetlands and/or Wetland Buffers. 1. Additions to legally constructed structures existing within wetlands or wetland buffers that increase the footprint of development or impervious surfacing shall be permitted consistent with the development standards of this section; provided, that a wetland and/or buffer enhancement plan is provided to mitigate for impacts consistent with this title; and provided, that all impacts from temporary disturbances within the critical area buffer shall be addressed through use of best management plans and buffer enhancement plantings during and following construction of the allowed alteration. Provisions for standard wetland buffers, wetland buffer 4.4.a Packet Pg. 119 Attachment: Exhibit 1: Critical Areas Ordinance Wetlands Update (Critical Area Regulations for Wetlands) averaging with enhancement, and buffer reductions with enhancement require applicants to locate such additions in accordance with the following sequencing: a. Outside of the standard wetland buffer; b. Outside of a wetland buffer averaged (with enhancement) per subsection (G)(3) of this section; c. Outside of a wetland buffer reduced (with enhancement) per subsection (G)(4) of this section; d. Outside of the inner 25 percent of the standard wetland buffer width with no more than 300 square feet of structure addition footprint within the inner 50 percent of the standard wetland buffer width; provided, that enhancement is provided at a minimum three-to-one (3:1) ratio (enhancement-to-impact); e. Outside of the inner 25 percent of the standard wetland buffer width with no more than 500 square feet of new footprint within the inner 50 percent of the standard wetland buffer width; provided, that enhancement is provided at a minimum five-to-one (5:1) ratio (enhancement-to-impact), and that storm water low impact development (LID) techniques and other measures are included as part of the wetland/buffer enhancement plan. 2. Where meeting wetland buffer enhancement requirements required by subsection (I)(1) of this section would result in enhancement that is separated from the critical area due to uncommon property ownership, alternative enhancement approaches may be approved by the director. Alternative approaches could include a vegetated rain garden that receives storm runoff, replacement of existing impervious surfaces with pervious materials, or other approaches that provide ecological benefits to the adjacent critical area. 3. Additions to legally constructed structures existing within wetlands or wetland buffers that cannot be accommodated in accordance with the sequencing in subsection (I)(1) of this section (i.e., additions proposed within a wetland or the inner 25 percent of a standard buffer width) may be permitted at the director’s discretion as a variance subject to review by the city hearing examiner and the provisions of ECDC 23.40.210. 4.4.a Packet Pg. 120 Attachment: Exhibit 1: Critical Areas Ordinance Wetlands Update (Critical Area Regulations for Wetlands) J. Development Proposals within the Footprint of Existing Development. New development shall be allowed within the footprint of existing development occurring within a wetland buffer; provided, that the following conditions are met: 1. The footprint of existing development was legally established, and is consistent with the definition provided in ECDC 23.40.005; 2. The proposed development within the footprint of existing development is sited as far away from the wetland edge as is feasible; 3. As part of the development proposal, opportunities to reduce the footprint of existing development are implemented where such reduction would increase the buffer width adjacent to the wetland and not represent an undue burden given the scale of the proposed development; 4. The proposed development includes enhancement to the adjacent wetland and associated buffer in order to improve functions degraded by previous development; 5. Enhancement is provided as wetland or buffer enhancement for an equivalent area of the footprint of the newly proposed development within the footprint of existing development occurring in a wetland buffer, or through an alternative approach approved by the director that restores degraded functions of the wetland and remaining buffer; and 6. Impacts from temporary disturbances within the wetland buffer shall be addressed through use of best management plans and buffer enhancement plantings during and following construction of the allowed alteration. K. Exemptions and Allowed Uses in Wetlands. The following wetlands may be exempt from the requirement to avoid impacts (ECDC 23.40.120.B.1), and they may be filled if the impacts are fully mitigated based on the remaining actions in ECDC 23.40.120.B.2 through 6. If available, impacts should be mitigated through the purchase of credits from an in-lieu fee program or mitigation bank, consistent with the terms and conditions of the program or bank. In order to verify the following conditions, a critical area report for wetlands meeting the requirements in ECDC 23.50.030 must be submitted. 1. All isolated Category IV wetlands less than 4,000 square feet that: 4.4.a Packet Pg. 121 Attachment: Exhibit 1: Critical Areas Ordinance Wetlands Update (Critical Area Regulations for Wetlands) a. Are not associated with riparian areas or their buffers; b. Are not associated with shorelines of the state or their associated buffers; c. Are not part of a wetland mosaic; d. Do not score 6 or more points for habitat function based on the 2014 update to the Washington State Wetland Rating System for Western Washington: 2014 Update (Ecology Publication #14-06-029, or as revised and approved by Ecology); and e. Do not contain a Priority Habitat or a Priority Area1 for a Priority Species identified by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, do not contain federally listed species or their critical habitat, or species of local importance identified in Chapter 23.90 ECDC. 2. Wetlands less than 1,000 square feet that meet the above criteria and do not contain federally listed species or their critical habitat are exempt from the buffer provisions contained in this Chapter. K. Small, Hydrologically Isolated Wetlands. The director may allow small, hydrologically isolated Category III or IV wetlands under 1,000 square feet in area to be exempt from the avoidance sequencing provisions of ECDC 23.40.120 and the wetland development standards provisions of subsection (F) of this section. At the discretion of the director such wetlands may be altered; provided, that a submitted critical areas report and mitigation plan provides evidence that all of the following conditions are met: 1. The wetland is less than 1,000 square feet in area; 2. The wetland does not provide significant habitat value for wildlife; 3. The wetland is not adjacent to a riparian area; 4. The wetland has a score of three to four points for habitat in the adopted Western Washington rating system; and 5. A mitigation plan to replace lost wetland functions and values is developed, approved and implemented consistent with ECDC 23.50.050. 4.4.a Packet Pg. 122 Attachment: Exhibit 1: Critical Areas Ordinance Wetlands Update (Critical Area Regulations for Wetlands) Section 6. Severability. If any section, subsection, clause, sentence, or phrase of this ordinance should be held invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. Section 7. Effective Date. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifically delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum and shall take effect five (5) days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the title. APPROVED: MAYOR DAVE EARLING ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY: BY JEFF TARADAY FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE DATE: ORDINANCE NO. 4.4.a Packet Pg. 123 Attachment: Exhibit 1: Critical Areas Ordinance Wetlands Update (Critical Area Regulations for Wetlands) 27 SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. __________ of the City of Edmonds, Washington On the ____ day of ___________, 2018, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed Ordinance No. _____________. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting of the title, provides as follows: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE CRITICAL AREAS REGULATIONS CONTAINED IN EDMONDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE CHAPTER 23.50, ENTITLED “WETLANDS.” The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request. DATED this _____ day of ________________, 2018. CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY 4840-7251-8158, v. 1 4.4.a Packet Pg. 124 Attachment: Exhibit 1: Critical Areas Ordinance Wetlands Update (Critical Area Regulations for Wetlands) Wetland Guidance for CAO Updates Western Washington Version June 2016 Publication No. 16-06-001 4.4.b Packet Pg. 125 Attachment: Exhibit 2: Wetland Guidance for CAO Updates Publication No. 16-06-001 (Critical Area Regulations for Wetlands) Publication and Contact Information This report is available on the Department of Ecology’s website at https://fortress.wa.gov/ecy/publications/SummaryPages/1606001.html For more information contact: Shorelands and Environmental Assistance Program P.O. Box 47600 Olympia, WA 98504-7600 Phone: 360-407-6600 Washington State Department of Ecology - www.ecy.wa.gov o Headquarters, Olympia 360-407-6000 o Northwest Regional Office, Bellevue 425-649-7000 o Southwest Regional Office, Olympia 360-407-6300 o Central Regional Office, Yakima 509-575-2490 o Eastern Regional Office, Spokane 509-329-3400 To ask about the availability of this document in a format for the visually impaired, call the Shorelands and Environmental Assistance Program at 360-407-6600. Persons with hearing loss can call 711 for Washington Relay Service. Persons with a speech disability can call 877-833-6341. 4.4.b Packet Pg. 126 Attachment: Exhibit 2: Wetland Guidance for CAO Updates Publication No. 16-06-001 (Critical Area Regulations for Wetlands) Wetland Guidance for CAO Updates Western Washington Version By Donna Bunten, Rick Mraz, Lauren Driscoll and Amy Yahnke Shorelands and Environmental Assistance Program Washington State Department of Ecology Olympia, Washington June 2016 Publication No. 16-06-001 4.4.b Packet Pg. 127 Attachment: Exhibit 2: Wetland Guidance for CAO Updates Publication No. 16-06-001 (Critical Area Regulations for Wetlands) This page is purposely left blank 4.4.b Packet Pg. 128 Attachment: Exhibit 2: Wetland Guidance for CAO Updates Publication No. 16-06-001 (Critical Area Regulations for Wetlands) Table of Contents Summary .......................................................................................... 1 Introduction ...................................................................................... 2 Guidance on the Science of Wetland Protection ............................. 3 Relationship between the GMA and the SMA ................................ 4 Policy Discussion for Your Wetlands Chapter ................................ 4 PURPOSE ........................................................................................................................... 4 DEFINITIONS ..................................................................................................................... 4 IDENTIFYING, DESIGNATING, AND RATING WETLANDS .................................................... 5 REGULATED USES AND ACTIVITIES .................................................................................. 7 EXEMPTIONS .................................................................................................................... 7 FOREST PRACTICES .......................................................................................................... 9 AGRICULTURAL ACTIVITIES ............................................................................................. 9 Strategies for Protecting Wetlands from Impacts .......................... 10 WETLANDS INVENTORY ................................................................................................. 10 ABCS ............................................................................................................................. 10 BUFFERS ......................................................................................................................... 11 BUFFER AVERAGING ...................................................................................................... 13 MITIGATION ................................................................................................................... 13 MITIGATION ALTERNATIVES .......................................................................................... 14 Mitigation Banking ............................................................................................... 15 In-Lieu Fee (ILF) .................................................................................................. 15 Off-Site Mitigation ................................................................................................ 16 Advance Mitigation ............................................................................................... 16 Conclusion ..................................................................................... 16 Appendix A - Sample Wetlands Chapter ...................................... 19 Appendix B - Wetland Definitions ................................................ 51 4.4.b Packet Pg. 129 Attachment: Exhibit 2: Wetland Guidance for CAO Updates Publication No. 16-06-001 (Critical Area Regulations for Wetlands) This page is purposely left blank 4.4.b Packet Pg. 130 Attachment: Exhibit 2: Wetland Guidance for CAO Updates Publication No. 16-06-001 (Critical Area Regulations for Wetlands) Wetlands Guidance for CAO Updates Western Washington Version Page 1 Summary This publication replaces Wetlands & CAO Updates: Guidance for Small Cities (Western Washington Version), Publication No. 10-06-002, January 2010. It also replaces the 1st revision dated July 2011 and the 2nd revision dated October 2012. This new publication, for the most part, contains the same guidance as the “small cities guidance” referenced above. Over the last few years, it became obvious that the information in that document could apply to all cities and counties, not just small cities. However, the wetland buffer table may be too restrictive for county use because it assumes that adjacent land use intensity is high. Counties and larger cities generally have more staff and resources that allow more sophisticated approaches to assigning wetland buffers. In addition, these jurisdictions may be able to provide additional protection for habitat function by requiring protected wildlife corridors between the wetland and other priority habitats in exchange for buffer reduction—something that is often impossible in small, urban jurisdictions. Check with Ecology wetland staff for more information about using this guidance in your particular jurisdiction http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/sea/wetlands/contacts.htm. Specific changes to this new publication include: • Reference to the updated 2014 wetland rating system • Updated definitions based on the updated 2014 wetland rating system • Buffer tables that include habitat scores from the updated 2014 wetland rating system • Addition of buffer table to be used if minimizing measures are not used • Emphasis on the requirement to provide wildlife corridors where possible in exchange for buffer reduction • Guidance on using wetlands for stormwater management facilities • Revisions to exemptions for small wetlands • Recommended language addressing agricultural activities in non-VSP jurisdictions • Addition of recent mitigation documents and guidance • Corrected links to resource documents and web pages 4.4.b Packet Pg. 131 Attachment: Exhibit 2: Wetland Guidance for CAO Updates Publication No. 16-06-001 (Critical Area Regulations for Wetlands) Wetlands Guidance for CAO Updates Western Washington Version Page 2 Introduction This document is intended to provide guidance and tools useful in developing a wetland protection program for jurisdictions that are in the process of updating their critical areas ordinances (CAOs) to meet the Growth Management Act (GMA) requirements. Wetlands are one of the five types of critical areas identified in the GMA. We recognize that many local governments lack the planning staff and resources necessary to develop and implement wetland standards that are both locally appropriate and based on best available science (BAS). Nonetheless, they must comply with the GMA requirement to designate and protect wetlands. The first part of this document describes the important topics that should be addressed in the wetlands section of your CAO. It includes recommendations for wetland protection based on BAS. Appendix A is a sample CAO chapter for wetlands that incorporates these recommendations into a format similar to that found in many local CAOs. (Please note that the sample CAO will need to be tailored to your jurisdiction’s naming and numbering system. There are several generic “XX” references throughout the text.) Appendix B contains definitions that are commonly used in wetlands regulations. This document does not include the more general provisions typically found in regulations related to all critical areas. These can be found in Appendix A of the Critical Areas Assistance Handbook published by the Washington State Department of Commerce (formerly the Department of Community, Trade, and Economic Development) in November 2003 http://www.commerce.wa.gov/Documents/GMS- Critical-Areas-Appendix-A-Sample-Code-Provisions.pdf. This document revises the wetland-specific provisions in the Critical Areas Assistance Handbook. The recommendations in this document and the sample ordinance may not be appropriate for use by rural county governments. Factors to consider are the county’s rate of growth, the nature and intensity of land uses in the county, the wetland resources at risk, and the ability of the county to implement its CAO. We suggest that you contact us to determine whether this guidance is applicable to your county. Please use the following link to find Ecology’s wetland specialist for your area: http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/sea/wetlands/contacts.htm. 4.4.b Packet Pg. 132 Attachment: Exhibit 2: Wetland Guidance for CAO Updates Publication No. 16-06-001 (Critical Area Regulations for Wetlands) Wetlands Guidance for CAO Updates Western Washington Version Page 3 Guidance on the Science of Wetland Protection Ecology has produced several different tools that can help local governments develop a comprehensive wetlands protection program for their jurisdictions. The Washington Departments of Ecology (Ecology) and Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) have published a two-volume guidance document to help local governments protect and manage wetlands: ● Wetlands in Washington State, Volume 1: A Synthesis of the Science (Washington State Department of Ecology Publication #05-06-006, Olympia, WA, March 2005). This volume is the result of an extensive search of over 17,000 scientific articles and synthesizes over 1,000 peer-reviewed works relevant to the management of Washington’s wetlands. ● Wetlands in Washington State, Volume 2: Managing and Protecting Wetlands (Washington State Department of Ecology Publication #05-06-008, Olympia, WA, April 2005). This volume was developed with the assistance of local government planners and wetland consultants. It can be used to craft regulatory language that is based on BAS. We recommend that you review Chapter 8 and its appendices as you begin to work on updating your existing regulations. (Please note: Appendix 8-C was revised in October 2014.) In October 2013, Ecology released an update of the science pertaining to wetland buffers. The new information on buffers provides a refinement of our knowledge and revisits the conclusions and key points in the 2005 synthesis. • Update on Wetland Buffers: The State of the Science (Washington State Department of Ecology Publication #13-06-011, Olympia, WA, October 2013. Ecology, in coordination with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), has also developed a two-part guidance document aimed at improving the quality and effectiveness of compensatory mitigation in Washington State: ● Wetland Mitigation in Washington State – Part 1: Agency Policies and Guidance (Version 1) (Washington State Department of Ecology Publication #06-06-011a, Olympia, WA, March 2006). Part 1 provides a brief background on wetlands, an overview of the factors that go into the agencies’ permitting decisions, and detailed guidance on the agencies’ policies of wetland mitigation, particularly compensatory mitigation. It outlines the information the agencies use to determine whether specific mitigation plans are appropriate and adequate. ● Wetland Mitigation in Washington State–Part 2: Developing Mitigation Plans (Version 1) (Washington State Department of Ecology Publication #06-06-011b, Olympia, WA, March 2006). Part 2 provides technical information on preparing plans for compensatory mitigation. 4.4.b Packet Pg. 133 Attachment: Exhibit 2: Wetland Guidance for CAO Updates Publication No. 16-06-001 (Critical Area Regulations for Wetlands) Wetlands Guidance for CAO Updates Western Washington Version Page 4 Ecology has also developed a wetland ratings system for western Washington. The rating system is a useful tool for dividing wetlands into groups that have similar needs for protection. • Washington State Wetland Rating System for Western Washington: 2014 Update (Washington State Department of Ecology Publication #14-06-29, Olympia, WA, October 2014). Links to all of these documents can be found at: http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/sea/wetlands/gma/index.html. Relationship between the GMA and the SMA You may be planning to adopt a Shoreline Master Program (SMP) that will rely on the CAO for protection of wetlands and other critical areas in shoreline jurisdiction. Ecology does not have an approval role in the CAO adoption process; our role is advisory. The SMP, however, is a joint document of Ecology and the local government requiring Ecology approval. Before the SMP can be approved by Ecology, the CAO must meet the “no net loss of ecological functions” requirement (WAC 173-26-186(8)(b)(i)). You should be aware that the Shoreline Management Act (SMA) may preclude or alter the administration of your CAO. For example, certain activities exempted under the CAO will not qualify for exemption under the SMP. In addition, activities allowed without permits under the CAO may require permits under the SMP. For assistance with CAO-SMP integration, please use the following link to find the shoreline planner for your area: http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/sea/sma/contacts/index.html. Policy Discussion for Your Wetlands Chapter Your wetlands chapter will exist as one of several in your critical areas ordinance. Below we describe some of the important subsections in the wetlands chapter and include our recommendations for protecting wetlands based on the best available science. Purpose The chapter typically begins with a purpose statement, followed by designation criteria, which include a definition of wetlands and the methods by which they are identified and rated and other details listed below. The purpose statement may also state that this chapter is intended to be consistent with the requirements of 36.70A RCW and to implement the goals and policies of your Comprehensive Plan for protecting wetlands. Definitions Your wetlands chapter may include a separate list of definitions, or the definitions may be included in the general definitions section of the CAO. Appendix B is a list of 4.4.b Packet Pg. 134 Attachment: Exhibit 2: Wetland Guidance for CAO Updates Publication No. 16-06-001 (Critical Area Regulations for Wetlands) Wetlands Guidance for CAO Updates Western Washington Version Page 5 definitions relevant to your wetlands chapter. This list includes terms identified in state law and agency guidance documents. Clarity and consistency in the use of these terms will make ordinance implementation easier. Identifying, Designating, and Rating Wetlands The first steps in regulating wetlands are to define what is being regulated and specify how these areas will be identified. The GMA requires the use of the following definition of wetlands and specifies how to identify and delineate them. In designating wetlands for regulatory purposes, counties and cities are required to use the definition of wetlands in RCW 36.70A.030(21): “Wetland” or “wetlands” means areas that are inundated or saturated by surface water or ground water at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions. Wetlands generally include swamps, marshes, bogs, and similar areas. Wetlands do not include those artificial wetlands intentionally created from non- wetland sites, including, but not limited to, irrigation and drainage ditches, grass-lined swales, canals, detention facilities, wastewater treatment facilities, farm ponds, and landscape amenities, or those wetlands created after July 1, 1990, that were unintentionally created as a result of the construction of a road, street, or highway. Wetlands may include those artificial wetlands intentionally created from non-wetland areas created to mitigate conversion of wetlands. Wetlands are subject to a local government’s regulatory authority if they meet the criteria in this definition. This includes Prior Converted Croplands (PCCs) and isolated wetlands. These wetlands can provide critical functions and habitat and should be regulated. The GMA does not allow flexibility in adopting a modified definition of wetlands. Irrigation practices, such as the Irrigation District ditches in Sequim, can result in human- created wetlands. More frequently, however, irrigation practices may augment natural sources of water to a wetland. Wetlands that form along irrigation ditches that were intentionally created in uplands may be exempted from regulation. However, if a wetland is the unintentional by-product of irrigation activities, the wetland should be regulated. If a wetland disappears as the result of a change in irrigation practice, it will not be regulated in the future. However, most wetlands will not disappear completely as a result of local changes in irrigation practices because of natural sources of water or regional irrigation influences. Please see http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/sea/wetlands/irrigation.html for more information on how Ecology regulates irrigation-influenced wetlands. Ecology is most concerned about those changes in land use that would eliminate wetlands as the result of fill or grading, such as a conversion to commercial or residential use. These activities should be regulated by the CAO, and appropriate protection standards 4.4.b Packet Pg. 135 Attachment: Exhibit 2: Wetland Guidance for CAO Updates Publication No. 16-06-001 (Critical Area Regulations for Wetlands) Wetlands Guidance for CAO Updates Western Washington Version Page 6 (such as buffers and mitigation) should be required in order to minimize the loss of wetland area and function. Many jurisdictions use the National Wetland Inventory (NWI) to determine whether wetlands exist within their boundaries. Since the NWI is based on photographs that are over 30 years old and provides only a general approximation of wetland location, it cannot be used alone to designate wetlands. Wetlands are those areas that meet the above definition of “wetland.” Wetlands are also dynamic systems that change over time. It is important to adopt the GMA definition and to have regulations in place to protect wetland functions and values, should wetlands that do not currently appear on the NWI or other maps be identified in the future. State laws require that wetlands protected under the GMA and the SMA be delineated using a manual that is developed by Ecology and adopted into rules (RCW 36.70A.175; RCW 90.58.380). The Department of Ecology adopted a wetland delineation manual in 1997 (WAC 173-22-080) that was based on the original 1987 Corps of Engineers manual and subsequent Regulatory Guidance Letters. During the last few years the Army Corps of Engineers has updated and expanded their delineation manual with regional supplements. To maintain consistency between the state and federal delineations of wetlands, Ecology has repealed WAC 173-22-080 (the state delineation manual) and replaced it with a revision of WAC 173-22-035 that states that delineations should be done according to the currently approved federal manual and regional supplements. The changes became effective March 14, 2011. The GMA states that “wetlands regulated under development regulations adopted pursuant to this chapter shall be delineated in accordance with the manual adopted by the department pursuant to RCW 90.58.380.” RCW 90.58.380 allows the Department of Ecology to adopt rules that incorporate changes to the manual. Therefore, the currently approved federal manual and regional supplements should be used for delineating wetlands in GMA jurisdiction. See: http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/sea/wetlands/delineation.html. Local governments are not required to rate or classify wetlands when regulating them. However, methods that classify, categorize, or rate wetlands help target the appropriate level of protection to particular types of wetlands and avoid the “one-size-fits-all” approach. If a local government uses a wetland rating system, it must consider the criteria described in WAC 365-190-090(3). The Washington State Wetland Rating System for Western Washington: 2014 Update (Effective January 2015), (Ecology Publication #14-06-029, October 2014) is a useful tool for dividing wetlands into groups that have similar needs for protection. The revised rating system represents the best available science, as it is based on a better understanding of wetland functions, ways to evaluate them, and what is needed to protect them. It provides a quick “snapshot” characterization of a particular wetland. In many cases, it will provide enough information about existing wetland functions to allow 4.4.b Packet Pg. 136 Attachment: Exhibit 2: Wetland Guidance for CAO Updates Publication No. 16-06-001 (Critical Area Regulations for Wetlands) Wetlands Guidance for CAO Updates Western Washington Version Page 7 adequate plan review and land use decisions to be made without the additional expense of a separate wetland functional assessment. While local governments are not required to use Ecology’s revised rating system, we strongly encourage you to adopt wetland regulations that require its use. Most qualified wetland specialists are using the revised rating system. In cases where state and federal permits are required, the use of this rating system would benefit applicants by eliminating the need to rate wetlands according to a different local standard. If you choose not to use the state’s wetland rating system, you must provide a rationale for this decision according to WAC 365-190-090(3). We recommend that you include language that describes the four categories of wetlands. This text is different for eastern and western Washington jurisdictions. Please refer to Appendix A, Section XX.020.B.1-4 for the specific category descriptions. Regulated Uses and Activities Your wetland section should list those uses and activities that are regulated under the critical areas ordinance. Some of these items include: removal, excavation, grading, or dredging of material of any kind; draining, flooding, or disturbing of the wetland, water level, or water table; the construction, reconstruction, demolition, or expansion of any structure; etc. More extensive examples are provided in the sample ordinance. Wetlands are often impacted by unauthorized clearing and grading that takes place before application for development permits. You should make sure your CAO adequately regulates clearing and grading. If it doesn’t, you should adopt a separate clearing and grading ordinance. The Department of Commerce (formerly Community, Trade and Economic Development) published technical guidance on developing a clearing and grading ordinance: http://www.commerce.wa.gov/Documents/GMS- Clearing-and-Grading-Technical-Guidance-Final-2005.pdf. Most forest practices (as defined in RCW 76.09 are exempted from the provisions of a wetlands chapter in the CAO. However, those forest practices that are Class IV general should be regulated. These activities constitute a conversion from forestry to some other use. As such, buffers and wetland protections are appropriate. Exemptions Your wetlands section should identify those activities in or near wetlands that are regulated and those that are exempt from regulation. Exemptions include activities that will have little or no environmental effect or are an emergency that threatens public health or safety. In the case of emergency response activities that affect wetlands and buffers, the responsible party should be required to obtain after-the-fact permits and to rectify impacts. Some jurisdictions place the exemptions or exceptions in a general exemptions section near the front of the CAO. However, some exemptions or exceptions may apply only to wetlands, so it may be more practical to have these specific exemptions in the wetlands section. 4.4.b Packet Pg. 137 Attachment: Exhibit 2: Wetland Guidance for CAO Updates Publication No. 16-06-001 (Critical Area Regulations for Wetlands) Wetlands Guidance for CAO Updates Western Washington Version Page 8 Exempt activities should be limited to those that will not have a significant impact on a wetland’s structure and function (including its water, soil, or vegetation) and those that are expected to be very short term. Local governments should, however, also consider the cumulative impacts from exempted activities. They can result in a loss of wetland acreage and function that are not replaced through compensatory mitigation. The scope, coverage, and applicability of a critical areas ordinance should capture the full range of activities that are detrimental to wetland functions. Therefore, exemptions should be supported by the scientific literature and be carefully crafted to minimize the potential for adverse impacts. However, a local government should not assume that an exemption is appropriate in the absence of science to refute the exemption. The language should clearly state whether a given activity is exempt from applicable standards in the code or whether it is exempt from needing a permit but still must comply with the code. Exemptions should be limited and construed narrowly. For more information on this topic, please refer to Chapter 8 of Wetlands in Washington State, Volume 2: Managing and Protecting Wetlands (Ecology Publication #05-06-008, Olympia, WA, April 2005: https://fortress.wa.gov/ecy/publications/summarypages/0506008.html). The GMA, in RCW 36.70a.030(21), requires local governments to regulate wetlands that meet the GMA-required definition of “wetland” (see the definition of “wetland” in the previous section). This includes Prior Converted Croplands (PCCs) and hydrologically isolated wetlands, two types of wetlands that have been exempt from federal regulation at times. PCCs are wetlands that have been ditched and drained for active agricultural use before December 23, 1985. Isolated wetlands are those wetlands that have no surface hydrologic connection to waters of the United States. These wetlands must be regulated by your CAO. Please see http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/sea/wetlands/isolated.html for more information on how the state of Washington currently regulates isolated wetlands. The scientific literature does not support exempting wetlands that are below a certain size. While we recognize an administrative desire to place size thresholds on wetlands that are to be regulated, you need to be aware that it is not possible to conclude from size alone what functions a particular wetland may be providing. Ecology has developed a strategy for exempting small wetlands when additional criteria are considered. This language is present in the sample ordinance. However, impacts to small wetlands are NOT exempt from the requirement to provide compensatory mitigation for those impacts. If an in-lieu fee (ILF) program or a mitigation bank is available in your area (see page 15), these mitigation alternatives can help prevent a net loss of wetland function from impacts to small wetlands in your jurisdiction. Exceptions are typically addressed in a CAO in the context of reasonable use of property. For more information about this regulatory tool, see Section VII of the Critical Areas Assistance Handbook published by the Washington State Department of Commerce: http://www.commerce.wa.gov/Documents/GMS-Critical-Areas-Assist-Handbook.pdf . You should keep in mind that the Shoreline Management Act does not allow reasonable 4.4.b Packet Pg. 138 Attachment: Exhibit 2: Wetland Guidance for CAO Updates Publication No. 16-06-001 (Critical Area Regulations for Wetlands) Wetlands Guidance for CAO Updates Western Washington Version Page 9 use exceptions, providing instead a variance pathway to afford regulatory relief. If you decide to incorporate your CAO into your SMP when the latter document is updated, you will need to address this potential inconsistency. Forest Practices Class I, II, and III forest practices should be exempted from the wetlands section of your CAO. These activities are regulated through RCW 76.09, the Forest Practices Act. Agricultural Activities In 2011 the Washington Legislature created the Voluntary Stewardship Program (VSP) as an alternative for meeting GMA requirements related to protecting critical areas and agricultural lands. In 2015 the state provided funding for participating counties to begin the VSP planning process. For more information on this program, see http://www.scc.wa.gov/voluntary-stewardship/. For the GMA update cycle beginning 2015, some counties will begin addressing critical area issues related to agriculture through a VSP work plan. If your jurisdiction is not in a participating county or not in a participating watershed, then you must review and revise your development regulations for protecting wetlands as they apply to agricultural activities (see RCW 36.70A.710). If your jurisdiction is in a VSP watershed designated by a participating county, your GMA responsibilities to protect critical areas from agricultural activities in or near wetlands will be achieved through the VSP work plan. However, it is important to keep in mind that federal and state regulations, such as the Clean Water Act and the State Water Pollution Control Act are still applicable in all jurisdictions regardless of participation or non-participation in the VSP. The VSP does not alter the responsibility of property owners to meet water quality standards, protect wetlands, and comply with state and federal environmental regulations. Ecology recommends the following for non-VSP jurisdictions: “Existing and ongoing agricultural activities” are often exempted from the provisions of a CAO. These activities should be clearly defined and should not include removing trees, diverting or impounding water, excavation, ditching, draining, culverting, filling, grading, or similar activities that introduce new adverse impacts to wetlands or other aquatic resources. Maintenance of agricultural ditches should be limited to removing sediment in existing ditches to a specified depth at date of last maintenance. Conversion of wetlands that are not currently in agricultural use to a new agricultural use should be subject to the same regulations that govern new development. Ecology encourages the use of Best Management Practices (BMPs), farm conservation plans, and incentive-based programs to improve agricultural practices in and near wetlands. The goal of the BMPs should be to ensure that ongoing agricultural activities 4.4.b Packet Pg. 139 Attachment: Exhibit 2: Wetland Guidance for CAO Updates Publication No. 16-06-001 (Critical Area Regulations for Wetlands) Wetlands Guidance for CAO Updates Western Washington Version Page 10 minimize their effects on water quality, riparian ecology, salmonid populations, and wildlife habitat. Strategies for Protecting Wetlands from Impacts Wetlands Inventory You may wish to pursue accurate identification and rating of all wetlands in your planning area based on the Washington State Wetland Rating System for Western Washington: 2014 Update (Washington State Department of Ecology Publication #14- 06-29, Olympia, WA, October 2014) and the approved federal wetland delineation manual and applicable regional supplements. These documents can be downloaded at: • http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/sea/wetlands/ratingsystems/index.html (rating systems) • http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/sea/wetlands/delineation.html (delineation manual and supplements) While this approach may initially be more labor intensive and expensive, such information will allow rapid review of development proposals and can help your jurisdiction prioritize areas for preservation or acquisition. This approach is consistent with BAS. It can help with the development of a landscape- analysis approach to protecting wetlands in your jurisdiction. Landscape analysis for critical areas facilitates and informs long-range planning. The City of Aberdeen used this approach in their CAO update. (See Section XX.050.B in the sample ordinance.) ABCs The most basic approach to protecting wetland functions and values can be summarized as the A-B-C Approach, or Avoid-Buffer-Compensate. This means that a CAO should contain language to ensure that: 1. Wetlands impacts are avoided to the extent practicable. 2. Wetlands are buffered to protect them from adjacent land-use impacts. 3. Unavoidable impacts are compensated, or replaced. Your CAO should provide requirements on how to reduce the severity of impacts to wetlands. When an alteration to a wetland is proposed, impacts should be avoided, minimized, or compensated for in the following sequential order of preference: 1. Avoiding the impact altogether by not taking a certain action or parts of an action; 4.4.b Packet Pg. 140 Attachment: Exhibit 2: Wetland Guidance for CAO Updates Publication No. 16-06-001 (Critical Area Regulations for Wetlands) Wetlands Guidance for CAO Updates Western Washington Version Page 11 2. Minimizing impacts by limiting the degree or magnitude of the action and its implementation, by using appropriate technology, or by taking affirmative steps to avoid or reduce impacts; 3. Rectifying the impact by repairing, rehabilitating, or restoring the affected environment; 4. Reducing or eliminating the impact over time by preservation and maintenance operations during the life of the action; 5. Compensating for the impact by replacing, enhancing, or providing substitute resources or environments; and/or 6. Monitoring the impact and taking appropriate corrective measures. Buffers Establishing standards for wetland buffers is usually the most challenging part of developing a CAO. However, developing a predictable, reasonable approach for establishing buffers that includes the best available science is not as difficult as it may seem. The scientific literature is unequivocal that buffers are necessary to protect wetland functions and values. The literature consistently reports that the primary factors to evaluate in determining appropriate buffer widths are: 1. The wetland type and functions needing protection (buffers filter sediment, nutrients, or toxics; screen noise and light; provide forage, nesting, or resting habitat for wetland-dependent species; etc.). 2. The types of adjacent land use and their expected impacts. 3. The characteristics of the buffer area (slope, soils, vegetation). The widths of buffers needed vary widely, depending on these three factors. For example, providing filtration of coarse sediment from residential development next to a low-quality wetland would require only a relatively flat buffer of dense grasses or forest/shrub vegetation in the range of 20 to 30 feet. However, providing forage and nesting habitat for common wetland-dependent species such as waterfowl, herons, or amphibians in a high-quality wetland adjacent to residential development would require a buffer vegetated with trees and shrubs in the range of 200 to 300 feet. This illustrates the necessity of using an approach to buffers that incorporates wetland type and functions (based on an appropriate rating system), types of land use, and the environmental characteristics of the existing buffer. Your CAO should require buffers for activities that will impact wetland functions. Ecology’s complete buffer recommendations are presented in Appendix 8-C of Wetlands 4.4.b Packet Pg. 141 Attachment: Exhibit 2: Wetland Guidance for CAO Updates Publication No. 16-06-001 (Critical Area Regulations for Wetlands) Wetlands Guidance for CAO Updates Western Washington Version Page 12 in Washington State, Volume 2 (revised October 2014). We recommend using the tables shown in the sample ordinance. Tables XX.1 and XX.3 are derived from the more-detailed tables in Volume 2. They are easy to use and are based on BAS. This approach provides the important balance of predictability and flexibility. Determination of buffer size is simply a matter of applying the results of the wetland rating system score to the buffer matrix, based on the wetland category and wildlife habitat score. It generally requires smaller buffers for those wetlands that do not have much wildlife use. Table XX.1 requires the use of the minimizing measures in Table XX.2. These measures are intended to reduce the impacts of the adjacent land use on the wetland. If impacts are reduced, the size of the buffer required to protect the wetland’s functions can be reduced. The buffer widths in Table XX.1 represent a 25% reduction in our recommended buffers in Volume 2. Table XX.1 also requires the protection of a wildlife corridor between wetlands that score 5 or more habitat points and any other Priority Habitat. This requirement is particularly applicable in large or rural jurisdictions where species need to have access to other habitats to meet their life needs. A buffer is the usual means of providing this necessary habitat. However, if buffer reduction is allowed, we cannot ensure that these species will have adequate access to habitat without providing a connective corridor. In urban areas, the best solution is a landscape-based approach that takes into account actual species use and spatial arrangement and connectivity of habitats. Without such an approach, jurisdictions should use the guidance provided in the sample wetland chapter. If your jurisdiction is small and urban, providing a wildlife corridor may not be an option. You should consult with Ecology wetland staff to determine whether using Tables XX.1 and XX.2 alone will provide adequate protection for your wetland functions. Table XX.3 shows the buffer widths required if the minimizing measures in Table XX.2 are not implemented and if a wildlife corridor is not protected. These buffers are wider than those in Table XX.1, because the impacts to the wetland functions are potentially greater. The buffer tables XX.1 and XX.3 do not consider land-use intensity in the buffer calculation, since it is presumed that most urban land uses will be high or moderate intensity. However, if your jurisdiction has an activity that can be considered low intensity, such as a passive recreation area or nature park with undeveloped trails, you may wish to prescribe a smaller buffer for that area only. The buffer for an area should be no less than 75% of the otherwise required buffer. Such a “low-intensity” buffer is not appropriate for residential, commercial, or industrial uses. Of course, if your jurisdiction includes rural land uses, you should consider using the buffer tables in Appendix 8-C of Wetlands in Washington State, Volume 2 (revised October 2014). 4.4.b Packet Pg. 142 Attachment: Exhibit 2: Wetland Guidance for CAO Updates Publication No. 16-06-001 (Critical Area Regulations for Wetlands) Wetlands Guidance for CAO Updates Western Washington Version Page 13 Some wetland types listed in the buffer tables may not be present in your jurisdiction (e.g., coastal lagoons, bogs, interdunal wetlands, etc.). If you are certain that these wetlands do not occur within your jurisdiction and would not be introduced by future annexations, you may remove those wetland types from the buffer tables. You may wish to adopt an even simpler approach to wetland buffers, one based only on wetland category. In this case, buffers must be large enough to protect the most-sensitive wetlands from the most-damaging land-use impacts. Please refer to Table 8C-1 of Appendix 8-C of Wetlands in Washington State, Volume 2 (revised October 2014) for this example. Ecology’s buffer recommendations are based on a moderate-risk approach to protecting wetland functions. This means that there is a moderate risk that wetland functions will be impacted. Adopting smaller buffers represents a high-risk approach, and you need to be prepared to justify why such an approach is necessary and to offer alternative means of protecting wetland functions that help reduce the risk. Ecology’s buffer recommendations are also based on the assumption that the buffer is well vegetated with native species appropriate to the ecoregion. If the buffer does not consist of vegetation adequate to provide the necessary protection, then either the buffer area should be planted or the buffer width should be increased. Buffer Averaging Local governments often wish to allow buffer widths to be varied in certain circumstances. This may be reasonable if your standard buffers are adequate. The width of buffers may be averaged if this will improve the protection of wetland functions, or if it is the only way to allow for reasonable use of a parcel. We recommend that a request for buffer averaging include a wetland report. The report should be prepared by a qualified professional describing the current functions of the wetland and its buffer and the measures that will be taken to ensure that there is no loss of wetland function due to the buffer averaging. The width of the buffer at any given point after averaging should be no smaller than 75% of the standard buffer. If you choose to adopt narrower buffer widths than those supported by BAS, then further reductions to the buffer width should not be allowed under any circumstances. Mitigation Applicants are required by state and federal permitting agencies to show that they have followed mitigation sequencing and have first avoided and minimized impacts to wetlands wherever practicable. Your CAO should include the definition of mitigation sequencing and require applicants to demonstrate that they have applied avoidance and minimization. For more information and sample checklists, see http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/sea/wetlands/avoidance.html. 4.4.b Packet Pg. 143 Attachment: Exhibit 2: Wetland Guidance for CAO Updates Publication No. 16-06-001 (Critical Area Regulations for Wetlands) Wetlands Guidance for CAO Updates Western Washington Version Page 14 Unavoidable impacts to wetlands should be offset by compensatory mitigation. Your CAO should include standards for the type, location, amount, and timing of the mitigation. It should also include clear guidance on the design considerations and reporting requirements for mitigation plans. Ecology’s recommendations for the amount of mitigation (ratios) are based on wetland category, function, and special characteristics. Requiring a greater area for mitigation than the wetland area that will be impacted helps offset both the risk that compensatory mitigation will fail and the temporal loss of functions that may occur. We recommend using the ratio table shown in the sample ordinance. It is derived from the more-detailed tables in Part 1 of the joint agency guidance on mitigation: Wetland Mitigation in Washington State, Parts 1 and 2 (Ecology Publications #06-06-011a & b, March 2006). As an alternative to the mitigation ratios found in the joint guidance, Ecology has developed a credit-debit tool for calculating when a proposed wetland mitigation project adequately replaces the functions and values lost when wetlands are impacted. The tool is designed to provide guidance for both regulators and applicants during two stages of the mitigation process: 1. Estimating the functions and values lost when a wetland is altered (debits), and 2. Estimating the gain in functions and values that result from the mitigation (credits). The Department of Ecology, however, does not require the use of this credit-debit method. It provides one method for determining the adequacy of compensatory wetland mitigation. It does not set any new regulatory requirements. The document and worksheets can be downloaded at: http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/sea/wetlands/mitigation/creditdebit/index.html. In 2008 the Corps and the EPA issued a rule governing compensatory mitigation. The rule establishes performance standards and criteria to improve the quality and success of compensatory mitigation, mitigation banks, and in-lieu fee programs. For more information on the federal rule, see: http://water.epa.gov/lawsregs/guidance/wetlands/wetlandsmitigation_index.cfm. By adopting mitigation standards based on the state and federal guidance and rules, you will be providing consistency for applicants who must also apply for state and federal permits. Mitigation Alternatives Various options are available for mitigation, in addition to the traditional on-site concurrent option. These options include placing the mitigation away from the project site (off-site mitigation), building mitigation in advance of project impacts, and using third-party mitigation providers such as wetland banks and in-lieu-fee programs. Deciding which option should be used depends on what works best for the applicant and 4.4.b Packet Pg. 144 Attachment: Exhibit 2: Wetland Guidance for CAO Updates Publication No. 16-06-001 (Critical Area Regulations for Wetlands) Wetlands Guidance for CAO Updates Western Washington Version Page 15 for the environment. Some of these options may not be available in your area at this time. However, we recommend that your CAO allow these options. They can be effective and valuable tools in preventing a net loss of wetland functions. Some project applicants may propose mitigation that is consistent with sound ecological principles but is located outside of your jurisdiction. You may wish to include language in your CAO that enables your government to allow such out-of-jurisdiction mitigation opportunities. In addition to the following options, you might want to consider allowing transfer of development rights (TDR) as a tool for protecting wetlands. The Department of Commerce is working with four Puget Sound counties in a pilot TDR program. For more information, contact the Commerce planner for your jurisdiction or see: Commerce Regional Assistance Teams. Mitigation Banking A mitigation bank is a site where wetlands, streams, and/or other aquatic resource areas have been restored, established, enhanced, or (in certain circumstances) preserved for the purpose of providing compensation for unavoidable impacts to aquatic resources. A mitigation bank may be created by a government agency, corporation, nonprofit organization, or other entity. The bank sells its credits to permittees who are required to compensate for wetland impacts. Mitigation banks allow a permittee to simply write a check for their mitigation obligation. It is the bank owner who is responsible for the mitigation success. Mitigation banks require a formal agreement with the Corps, Ecology, and the local jurisdiction to be used for federal or state permits. Ecology adopted the final Wetland Mitigation Banks Rule (WAC 173-700) in 2009. The purpose of the rule is to provide a framework for the certification, operation, and monitoring of wetland mitigation banks. To learn more about wetland banking and the rule, see Ecology’s website at http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/sea/wetlands/mitigation/banking/index.html. In-Lieu Fee (ILF) In this approach to mitigation, a permittee pays a fee to a third party in lieu of conducting project-specific mitigation or buying credits from a mitigation bank. ILF mitigation is used mainly to compensate for impacts to wetlands when better approaches to compensation are not available or practicable, or when the use of an ILF is in the best interest of the environment. An ILF represents the expected costs to a third party of replacing the wetland functions lost or degraded as a result of the permittee’s project. Fees are typically held in trust until sufficient funds have been collected to finance a mitigation project. Only a nonprofit organization such as a local land trust, private conservation group, or government agency with demonstrated competence in natural resource management may operate an ILF program. All ILF programs must be approved by the Corps to be used for Section 404 4.4.b Packet Pg. 145 Attachment: Exhibit 2: Wetland Guidance for CAO Updates Publication No. 16-06-001 (Critical Area Regulations for Wetlands) Wetlands Guidance for CAO Updates Western Washington Version Page 16 permits. To learn more about ILF programs, see Ecology’s website at http://www.ecy.wa.gov/mitigation/ilf.html. Off-Site Mitigation This refers to compensatory mitigation that is not located at or near the project that generates impacts to wetlands. Off-site mitigation is generally allowed when on-site mitigation is not practicable or environmentally preferable. The 2008 federal rule on compensatory mitigation requires that some type of watershed approach be used in siting mitigation. Ecology, the Corps of Engineers, and EPA have developed guidance to help applicants select potential off-site mitigation sites. To download a copy of this guidance, Selecting Wetland Mitigation Sites Using a Watershed Approach (Western Washington) (Ecology Publication #09-06-032, December 2009), please see https://fortress.wa.gov/ecy/publications/summarypages/0906032.html. Advance Mitigation When compensatory mitigation is implemented before, and in anticipation of, future known impacts to wetlands, it is referred to as “advance mitigation.” Advance mitigation has been used mostly for large mitigation projects that are constructed in distinct phases where the unavoidable impacts to wetlands are known. Advance mitigation lets an applicant provide all of the compensation needed for the entire project affecting wetlands at one time, which may result in more favorable mitigation ratios. Although similar to mitigation banking, advance mitigation is different in several ways. Most importantly, advance mitigation is used only to compensate for the permittee’s specific project (or projects) with pre-identified impacts to wetlands. Wetland banks provide mitigation for unknown future impacts within a specific “service” area. The advance mitigation can be used only by the permittee. Advance mitigation may not be sold unless it is changed to a wetland bank. Ecology, WDFW, and the Corps have developed guidance to help applicants develop advance mitigation proposals. To download a copy of this guidance, Interagency Regulatory Guide: Advance Permittee-Responsible Mitigation (Ecology Publication #12-06-015, December 2012), please see https://fortress.wa.gov/ecy/publications/SummaryPages/1206015.html Conclusion We hope you find this information helpful. If you have questions about this document or need additional assistance with the wetlands section of your critical areas ordinance update, please call Donna Bunten at (360) 407-7172 or donna.bunten@ecy.wa.gov. You may also contact one of Ecology’s regional wetland specialists. They are available to work with you during your update process. For example, they can offer presentations to elected officials and planning commissions. They can also provide technical assistance including help with wetland delineation, wetland rating, ordinary high water 4.4.b Packet Pg. 146 Attachment: Exhibit 2: Wetland Guidance for CAO Updates Publication No. 16-06-001 (Critical Area Regulations for Wetlands) Wetlands Guidance for CAO Updates Western Washington Version Page 17 mark determination, and project review. Please use the following link to find the wetland specialist for your area: http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/sea/wetlands/contacts.htm. For assistance with other aspects of your critical areas ordinance update, please contact the Department of Commerce at (360) 725-3000. 4.4.b Packet Pg. 147 Attachment: Exhibit 2: Wetland Guidance for CAO Updates Publication No. 16-06-001 (Critical Area Regulations for Wetlands) Wetlands Guidance for CAO Updates Western Washington Version Page 18 This page is purposely left blank 4.4.b Packet Pg. 148 Attachment: Exhibit 2: Wetland Guidance for CAO Updates Publication No. 16-06-001 (Critical Area Regulations for Wetlands) Wetlands Guidance for CAO Updates Western Washington Version Page 19 Appendix A - Sample Wetlands Chapter (Western Washington) 4.4.b Packet Pg. 149 Attachment: Exhibit 2: Wetland Guidance for CAO Updates Publication No. 16-06-001 (Critical Area Regulations for Wetlands) Wetlands Guidance for CAO Updates Western Washington Version Page 20 This page is purposely left blank 4.4.b Packet Pg. 150 Attachment: Exhibit 2: Wetland Guidance for CAO Updates Publication No. 16-06-001 (Critical Area Regulations for Wetlands) Wetlands Guidance for CAO Updates Western Washington Version Page 21 Subchapter XX.XX Wetlands Sections: XX.010 Purpose XX.020 Identification and Rating XX.030 Regulated Activities XX.040 Exemptions and Allowed Uses in Wetlands XX.050 Wetland Buffers XX.060 Critical Area Reports XX.070 Compensatory Mitigation XX.080 Unauthorized Alterations and Enforcement XX.010 Purpose The purposes of this Chapter are to: A. Recognize and protect the beneficial functions performed by many wetlands, which include, but are not limited to, providing food, breeding, nesting and/or rearing habitat for fish and wildlife; recharging and discharging ground water; contributing to stream flow during low flow periods; stabilizing stream banks and shorelines; storing storm and flood waters to reduce flooding and erosion; and improving water quality through biofiltration, adsorption, and retention and transformation of sediments, nutrients, and toxicants. B. Regulate land use to avoid adverse effects on wetlands and maintain the functions and values of wetlands throughout (name of jurisdiction). C. Establish review procedures for development proposals in and adjacent to wetlands. 1. Compliance with the provisions of the Chapter does not constitute compliance with other federal, state, and local regulations and permit requirements that may be required (for example, Shoreline Substantial Development Permits, HPA permits, Army Corps of Engineers Section 404 permits, NPDES permits). The applicant is responsible for complying with these requirements, apart from the process established in this Chapter. XX.020 Identification and Rating A. Identification and Delineation. Identification of wetlands and delineation of their boundaries pursuant to this Chapter shall be done in accordance with the approved federal wetland delineation manual and applicable regional supplement. All areas within the City meeting the wetland designation criteria in that procedure are hereby designated critical areas and are subject to the provisions of this Chapter. Wetland delineations are 4.4.b Packet Pg. 151 Attachment: Exhibit 2: Wetland Guidance for CAO Updates Publication No. 16-06-001 (Critical Area Regulations for Wetlands) Wetlands Guidance for CAO Updates Western Washington Version Page 22 valid for five years; after such date the City shall determine whether a revision or additional assessment is necessary. B. Rating. Wetlands shall be rated according to the Washington Department of Ecology wetland rating system, as set forth in the Washington State Wetland Rating System for Western Washington: 2014 Update (Ecology Publication #14-06-029, or as revised and approved by Ecology), which contains the definitions and methods for determining whether the criteria below are met. 1. Category I. Category I wetlands are: (1) relatively undisturbed estuarine wetlands larger than 1 acre; (2) wetlands of high conservation value that are identified by scientists of the Washington Natural Heritage Program/DNR; (3) bogs; (4) mature and old-growth forested wetlands larger than 1 acre; (5) wetlands in coastal lagoons; (6) interdunal wetlands that score 8 or 9 habitat points and are larger than 1 acre; and (7) wetlands that perform many functions well (scoring 23 points or more). These wetlands: (1) represent unique or rare wetland types; (2) are more sensitive to disturbance than most wetlands; (3) are relatively undisturbed and contain ecological attributes that are impossible to replace within a human lifetime; or (4) provide a high level of functions. 2. Category II. Category II wetlands are: (1) estuarine wetlands smaller than 1 acre, or disturbed estuarine wetlands larger than 1 acre; (2) interdunal wetlands larger than 1 acre or those found in a mosaic of wetlands; or (3) wetlands with a moderately high level of functions (scoring between 20 and 22 points). 3. Category III. Category III wetlands are: (1) wetlands with a moderate level of functions (scoring between 16 and 19 points); (2) can often be adequately replaced with a well-planned mitigation project; and (3) interdunal wetlands between 0.1 and 1 acre. Wetlands scoring between 16 and 19 points generally have been disturbed in some ways and are often less diverse or more isolated from other natural resources in the landscape than Category II wetlands. 4. Category IV. Category IV wetlands have the lowest levels of functions (scoring fewer than 16 points) and are often heavily disturbed. These are wetlands that we should be able to replace, or in some cases to improve. However, experience has shown that replacement cannot be guaranteed in any specific case. These wetlands may provide some important functions, and should be protected to some degree. C. Illegal modifications. Wetland rating categories shall not change due to illegal modifications made by the applicant or with the applicant’s knowledge. 4.4.b Packet Pg. 152 Attachment: Exhibit 2: Wetland Guidance for CAO Updates Publication No. 16-06-001 (Critical Area Regulations for Wetlands) Wetlands Guidance for CAO Updates Western Washington Version Page 23 XX.030 Regulated Activities A. For any regulated activity, a critical areas report (see Chapter XX.060 of this Chapter) may be required to support the requested activity. B. The following activities are regulated if they occur in a regulated wetland or its buffer: 1. The removal, excavation, grading, or dredging of soil, sand, gravel, minerals, organic matter, or material of any kind. 2. The dumping of, discharging of, or filling with any material. 3. The draining, flooding, or disturbing of the water level or water table. 4. Pile driving. 5. The placing of obstructions. 6. The construction, reconstruction, demolition, or expansion of any structure. 7. The destruction or alteration of wetland vegetation through clearing, harvesting, shading, intentional burning, or planting of vegetation that would alter the character of a regulated wetland. 8. "Class IV - General Forest Practices" under the authority of the "1992 Washington State Forest Practices Act Rules and Regulations," WAC 222- 12-030, or as thereafter amended. 9. Activities that result in: a. A significant change of water temperature. b. A significant change of physical or chemical characteristics of the sources of water to the wetland. c. A significant change in the quantity, timing, or duration of the water entering the wetland. d. The introduction of pollutants. C. Subdivisions. The subdivision and/or short subdivision of land in wetlands and associated buffers are subject to the following: 1. Land that is located wholly within a wetland or its buffer may not be subdivided. 4.4.b Packet Pg. 153 Attachment: Exhibit 2: Wetland Guidance for CAO Updates Publication No. 16-06-001 (Critical Area Regulations for Wetlands) Wetlands Guidance for CAO Updates Western Washington Version Page 24 2. Land that is located partially within a wetland or its buffer may be subdivided provided that an accessible and contiguous portion of each new lot is: a. Located outside of the wetland and its buffer; and b. Meets the minimum lot size requirements of Chapter XX.XX. XX.040 Exemptions and Allowed Uses in Wetlands A. The following wetlands may be exempt from the requirement to avoid impacts (Chapter XX.070.A.1), and they may be filled if the impacts are fully mitigated based on the remaining actions in Chapter XX.070.A.2 through 6. If available, impacts should be mitigated through the purchase of credits from an in-lieu fee program or mitigation bank, consistent with the terms and conditions of the program or bank. In order to verify the following conditions, a critical area report for wetlands meeting the requirements in Chapter XX.060 must be submitted. 1. All isolated Category IV wetlands less than 4,000 square feet that: a. Are not associated with riparian areas or their buffers b. Are not associated with shorelines of the state or their associated buffers c. Are not part of a wetland mosaic d. Do not score 5 or more points for habitat function based on the 2014 update to the Washington State Wetland Rating System for Western Washington: 2014 Update (Ecology Publication #14-06-029, or as revised and approved by Ecology) e. Do not contain a Priority Habitat or a Priority Area1 for a Priority Species identified by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, do not contain federally listed species or their critical habitat, or species of local importance identified in Chapter XX.XX. 2. Wetlands less than 1,000 square feet that meet the above criteria and do not contain federally listed species or their critical habitat are exempt from the buffer provisions contained in this Chapter. 1See page 6 of “Priority Habitat and Species List,” Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, 2008, Olympia, Washington. 177 pp. 4.4.b Packet Pg. 154 Attachment: Exhibit 2: Wetland Guidance for CAO Updates Publication No. 16-06-001 (Critical Area Regulations for Wetlands) Wetlands Guidance for CAO Updates Western Washington Version Page 25 B. Activities Allowed in Wetlands. The activities listed below are allowed in wetlands. These activities do not require submission of a critical area report, except where such activities result in a loss of the functions and values of a wetland or wetland buffer. These activities include: 1. Existing and ongoing agricultural activities, provided that they implement applicable Best Management Practices (BMPs) contained in the latest editions of the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Field Office Technical Guide (FOTG); or develop a farm conservation plan in coordination with the local conservation district. BMPs and/or farm plans should address potential impacts to wetlands from livestock, nutrient and farm chemicals, soil erosion and sediment control and agricultural drainage infrastructure. BMPs and/or farm plans should ensure that ongoing agricultural activities minimize their effects on water quality, riparian ecology, salmonid populations, and wildlife habitat. 2. Those activities and uses conducted pursuant to the Washington State Forest Practices Act and its rules and regulations, WAC 222-12-030, where state law specifically exempts local authority, except those developments requiring local approval for Class 4 – General Forest Practice Permits (conversions) as defined in RCW 76.09 and WAC 222- 12. 3. Conservation or preservation of soil, water, vegetation, fish, shellfish, and/or other wildlife that does not entail changing the structure or functions of the existing wetland. 4. The harvesting of wild crops in a manner that is not injurious to natural reproduction of such crops and provided the harvesting does not require tilling of soil, planting of crops, chemical applications, or alteration of the wetland by changing existing topography, water conditions, or water sources. 5. Drilling for utilities/utility corridors under a wetland, with entrance/exit portals located completely outside of the wetland buffer, provided that the drilling does not interrupt the ground water connection to the wetland or percolation of surface water down through the soil column. Specific studies by a hydrologist are necessary to determine whether the ground water connection to the wetland or percolation of surface water down through the soil column will be disturbed. 6. Enhancement of a wetland through the removal of non-native invasive plant species. Removal of invasive plant species shall be restricted to hand removal unless permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies have been obtained for approved biological or chemical treatments. All removed plant material shall be taken away from the site and appropriately 4.4.b Packet Pg. 155 Attachment: Exhibit 2: Wetland Guidance for CAO Updates Publication No. 16-06-001 (Critical Area Regulations for Wetlands) Wetlands Guidance for CAO Updates Western Washington Version Page 26 disposed of. Plants that appear on the Washington State Noxious Weed Control Board list of noxious weeds must be handled and disposed of according to a noxious weed control plan appropriate to that species. Re- vegetation with appropriate native species at natural densities is allowed in conjunction with removal of invasive plant species. 7. Educational and scientific research activities. 8. Normal and routine maintenance and repair of any existing public or private facilities within an existing right-of-way, provided that the maintenance or repair does not expand the footprint of the facility or right- of-way. 9. Stormwater management facilities. A wetland or its buffer can be physically or hydrologically altered to meet the requirements of an LID, Runoff Treatment or Flow Control BMP if ALL of the following criteria are met: a. The wetland is classified as a Category IV or a Category III wetland with a habitat score of 3-4 points, and b. There will be “no net loss” of functions and values of the wetland, and c. The wetland does not contain a breeding population of any native amphibian species, and d. The hydrologic functions of the wetland can be improved as outlined in questions 3, 4, 5 of Chart 4 and questions 2, 3, 4 of Chart 5 in the “Guide for Selecting Mitigation Sites Using a Watershed Approach,” (available here: http://www.ecy.wa.gov/biblio/0906032.html); or the wetland is part of a priority restoration plan that achieves restoration goals identified in a Shoreline Master Program or other local or regional watershed plan, and e. The wetland lies in the natural routing of the runoff, and the discharge follows the natural routing, and f. All regulations regarding stormwater and wetland management are followed, including but not limited to local and state wetland and stormwater codes, manuals, and permits, and g. Modifications that alter the structure of a wetland or its soils will require permits. Existing functions and values that are lost would have to be compensated/replaced. 4.4.b Packet Pg. 156 Attachment: Exhibit 2: Wetland Guidance for CAO Updates Publication No. 16-06-001 (Critical Area Regulations for Wetlands) Wetlands Guidance for CAO Updates Western Washington Version Page 27 Stormwater LID BMPs required as part of New and Redevelopment projects can be considered within wetlands and their buffers. However, these areas may contain features that render LID BMPs infeasible. A site- specific characterization is required to determine if an LID BMP is feasible at the project site. XX.050 Wetland Buffers A. Buffer Requirements. The following buffer widths have been established in accordance with the best available science. They are based on the category of wetland and the habitat score as determined by a qualified wetland professional using the Washington State Wetland Rating System for Western Washington: 2014 Update (Ecology Publication #14-06-029, or as revised and approved by Ecology). The adjacent land use intensity is assumed to be high. 1. For wetlands that score 5 points or more for habitat function, the buffers in Table XX.1 can be used if both of the following criteria are met: • A relatively undisturbed, vegetated corridor at least 100 feet wide is protected between the wetland and any other Priority Habitats as defined by the Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife. The latest definitions of priority habitats and their locations are available on the WDFW web site at: http://wdfw.wa.gov/hab/phshabs.htm ) The corridor must be protected for the entire distance between the wetland and the Priority Habitat by some type of legal protection such as a conservation easement. Presence or absence of a nearby habitat must be confirmed by a qualified biologist. If no option for providing a corridor is available, Table XX.1 may be used with the required measures in Table XX.2 alone.2 • The measures in Table XX.2 are implemented, where applicable, to minimize the impacts of the adjacent land uses. 2. For wetlands that score 3-4 habitat points, only the measures in Table XX.2 are required for the use of Table XX.1 3. If an applicant chooses not to apply the mitigation measures in Table XX.2, or is unable to provide a protected corridor where available, then Table XX.3 must be used. 2 See discussion in the Introduction, page 12 as to whether this applies in small urban jurisdictions. 4.4.b Packet Pg. 157 Attachment: Exhibit 2: Wetland Guidance for CAO Updates Publication No. 16-06-001 (Critical Area Regulations for Wetlands) Wetlands Guidance for CAO Updates Western Washington Version Page 28 4. The buffer widths in Table XX.1 and XX.3 assume that the buffer is vegetated with a native plant community appropriate for the ecoregion. If the existing buffer is unvegetated, sparsely vegetated, or vegetated with invasive species that do not perform needed functions, the buffer should either be planted to create the appropriate plant community or the buffer should be widened to ensure that adequate functions of the buffer are provided. Table XX.1 Wetland Buffer Requirements for Western Washington if Table XX.2 is Implemented and Corridor Provided Buffer width (in feet) based on habitat score Wetland Category 3-4 5 6-7 8-9 Category I: Based on total score 75 105 165 225 Category I: Bogs and Wetlands of High Conservation Value 190 225 Category I: Coastal Lagoons 150 165 225 Category I: Interdunal 225 Category I: Forested 75 105 165 225 Category I: Estuarine 150 (buffer width not based on habitat scores) Category II: Based on score 75 105 165 225 Category II: Interdunal Wetlands 110 165 225 Category II: Estuarine 110 (buffer width not based on habitat scores) Category III (all) 60 105 165 225 Category IV (all) 40 4.4.b Packet Pg. 158 Attachment: Exhibit 2: Wetland Guidance for CAO Updates Publication No. 16-06-001 (Critical Area Regulations for Wetlands) Wetlands Guidance for CAO Updates Western Washington Version Page 29 Table XX.2 Required measures to minimize impacts to wetlands (Measures are required if applicable to a specific proposal) Disturbance Required Measures to Minimize Impacts Lights • Direct lights away from wetland Noise • Locate activity that generates noise away from wetland • If warranted, enhance existing buffer with native vegetation plantings adjacent to noise source • For activities that generate relatively continuous, potentially disruptive noise, such as certain heavy industry or mining, establish an additional 10’ heavily vegetated buffer strip immediately adjacent to the outer wetland buffer Toxic runoff • Route all new, untreated runoff away from wetland while ensuring wetland is not dewatered • Establish covenants limiting use of pesticides within 150 ft of wetland • Apply integrated pest management Stormwater runoff • Retrofit stormwater detention and treatment for roads and existing adjacent development • Prevent channelized flow from lawns that directly enters the buffer • Use Low Intensity Development techniques (for more information refer to the drainage ordinance and manual) Change in water regime • Infiltrate or treat, detain, and disperse into buffer new runoff from impervious surfaces and new lawns Pets and human disturbance • Use privacy fencing OR plant dense vegetation to delineate buffer edge and to discourage disturbance using vegetation appropriate for the ecoregion • Place wetland and its buffer in a separate tract or protect with a conservation easement Dust • Use best management practices to control dust 4.4.b Packet Pg. 159 Attachment: Exhibit 2: Wetland Guidance for CAO Updates Publication No. 16-06-001 (Critical Area Regulations for Wetlands) Wetlands Guidance for CAO Updates Western Washington Version Page 30 Table XX.3 Wetland Buffer Requirements for Western Washington if Table XX.2 is NOT Implemented or Corridor NOT provided Buffer width (in feet) based on habitat score Wetland Category 3-4 5 6-7 8-9 Category I: Based on total score 100 140 220 300 Category I: Bogs and Wetlands of High Conservation Value 250 300 Category I: Coastal Lagoons 200 220 300 Category I: Interdunal 300 Category I: Forested 100 140 220 300 Category I: Estuarine 200 (buffer width not based on habitat scores) Category II: Based on score 100 140 220 300 Category II: Interdunal Wetlands 150 220 300 Category II: Estuarine 150 (buffer width not based on habitat scores) Category III (all) 80 140 220 300 Category IV (all) 50 4.4.b Packet Pg. 160 Attachment: Exhibit 2: Wetland Guidance for CAO Updates Publication No. 16-06-001 (Critical Area Regulations for Wetlands) Wetlands Guidance for CAO Updates Western Washington Version Page 31 5. Increased Wetland Buffer Area Width. Buffer widths shall be increased on a case-by-case basis as determined by the Administrator when a larger buffer is necessary to protect wetland functions and values. This determination shall be supported by appropriate documentation showing that it is reasonably related to protection of the functions and values of the wetland. The documentation must include but not be limited to the following criteria: a. The wetland is used by a state or federally listed plant or animal species or has essential or outstanding habitat for those species, or has unusual nesting or resting sites such as heron rookeries or raptor nesting trees; or b. The adjacent land is susceptible to severe erosion, and erosion-control measures will not effectively prevent adverse wetland impacts; or c. The adjacent land has minimal vegetative cover or slopes greater than 30 percent. 6. Buffer averaging to improve wetland protection may be permitted when all of the following conditions are met: a. The wetland has significant differences in characteristics that affect its habitat functions, such as a wetland with a forested component adjacent to a degraded emergent component or a “dual-rated” wetland with a Category I area adjacent to a lower-rated area. b. The buffer is increased adjacent to the higher-functioning area of habitat or more-sensitive portion of the wetland and decreased adjacent to the lower-functioning or less-sensitive portion as demonstrated by a critical areas report from a qualified wetland professional. c. The total area of the buffer after averaging is equal to the area required without averaging. d. The buffer at its narrowest point is never less than either ¾ of the required width or 75 feet for Category I and II, 50 feet for Category III, and 25 feet for Category IV, whichever is greater. 7. Averaging to allow reasonable use of a parcel may be permitted when all of the following are met: a. There are no feasible alternatives to the site design that could be accomplished without buffer averaging. 4.4.b Packet Pg. 161 Attachment: Exhibit 2: Wetland Guidance for CAO Updates Publication No. 16-06-001 (Critical Area Regulations for Wetlands) Wetlands Guidance for CAO Updates Western Washington Version Page 32 b. The averaged buffer will not result in degradation of the wetland’s functions and values as demonstrated by a critical areas report from a qualified wetland professional. c. The total buffer area after averaging is equal to the area required without averaging. d. The buffer at its narrowest point is never less than either ¾ of the required width or 75 feet for Category I and II, 50 feet for Category III and 25 feet for Category IV, whichever is greater. B. To facilitate long-range planning using a landscape approach, the Administrator may identify and pre-assess wetlands using the rating system and establish appropriate wetland buffer widths for such wetlands. The Administrator will prepare maps of wetlands that have been pre-assessed in this manner. C. Measurement of Wetland Buffers. All buffers shall be measured perpendicular from the wetland boundary as surveyed in the field. The buffer for a wetland created, restored, or enhanced as compensation for approved wetland alterations shall be the same as the buffer required for the category of the created, restored, or enhanced wetland. Buffers must be fully vegetated in order to be included in buffer area calculations. Lawns, walkways, driveways, and other mowed or paved areas will not be considered buffers or included in buffer area calculations. D. Buffers on Wetland Mitigation Sites. All wetland mitigation sites shall have buffers consistent with the buffer requirements of this Chapter. Buffers shall be based on the expected or target category of the proposed wetland mitigation site. E. Buffer Maintenance. Except as otherwise specified or allowed in accordance with this Chapter, wetland buffers shall be retained in an undisturbed or enhanced condition. In the case of compensatory mitigation sites, removal of invasive non-native weeds is required for the duration of the mitigation bond (Section XX.070.J.2.a.x). F. Impacts to Buffers. Requirements for the compensation for impacts to buffers are outlined in Section XX.070 of this Chapter. G. Overlapping Critical Area Buffers. If buffers for two contiguous critical areas overlap (such as buffers for a stream and a wetland), the wider buffer applies. H. Allowed Buffer Uses. The following uses may be allowed within a wetland buffer in accordance with the review procedures of this Chapter, provided they are not prohibited by any other applicable law and they are conducted in a manner so as to minimize impacts to the buffer and adjacent wetland: 1. Conservation or restoration activities aimed at protecting the soil, water, vegetation, or wildlife. 4.4.b Packet Pg. 162 Attachment: Exhibit 2: Wetland Guidance for CAO Updates Publication No. 16-06-001 (Critical Area Regulations for Wetlands) Wetlands Guidance for CAO Updates Western Washington Version Page 33 2. Passive recreation facilities designed and in accordance with an approved critical area report, including: a. Walkways and trails, provided that those pathways are limited to minor crossings having no adverse impact on water quality. They should be generally parallel to the perimeter of the wetland, located only in the outer twenty-five percent (25%) of the wetland buffer area, and located to avoid removal of significant trees. They should be limited to pervious surfaces no more than five (5) feet in width for pedestrian use only. Raised boardwalks utilizing non-treated pilings may be acceptable. b. Wildlife-viewing structures. 3. Educational and scientific research activities. 4. Normal and routine maintenance and repair of any existing public or private facilities within an existing right-of-way, provided that the maintenance or repair does not increase the footprint or use of the facility or right-of-way. 5. The harvesting of wild crops in a manner that is not injurious to natural reproduction of such crops and provided the harvesting does not require tilling of soil, planting of crops, chemical applications, or alteration of the wetland by changing existing topography, water conditions, or water sources. 6. Drilling for utilities/utility corridors under a buffer, with entrance/exit portals located completely outside of the wetland buffer boundary, provided that the drilling does not interrupt the ground water connection to the wetland or percolation of surface water down through the soil column. Specific studies by a hydrologist are necessary to determine whether the ground water connection to the wetland or percolation of surface water down through the soil column would be disturbed. 7. Enhancement of a wetland buffer through the removal of non-native invasive plant species. Removal of invasive plant species shall be restricted to hand removal. All removed plant material shall be taken away from the site and appropriately disposed of. Plants that appear on the Washington State Noxious Weed Control Board list of noxious weeds must be handled and disposed of according to a noxious weed control plan appropriate to that species. Revegetation with appropriate native species at natural densities is allowed in conjunction with removal of invasive plant species. 4.4.b Packet Pg. 163 Attachment: Exhibit 2: Wetland Guidance for CAO Updates Publication No. 16-06-001 (Critical Area Regulations for Wetlands) Wetlands Guidance for CAO Updates Western Washington Version Page 34 8. Repair and maintenance of non-conforming uses or structures, where legally established within the buffer, provided they do not increase the degree of nonconformity. I. Signs and Fencing of Wetlands and Buffers: 1. Temporary markers. The outer perimeter of the wetland buffer and the clearing limits identified by an approved permit or authorization shall be marked in the field with temporary “clearing limits” fencing in such a way as to ensure that no unauthorized intrusion will occur. The marking is subject to inspection by the Administrator prior to the commencement of permitted activities. This temporary marking shall be maintained throughout construction and shall not be removed until permanent signs, if required, are in place. 2. Permanent signs. As a condition of any permit or authorization issued pursuant to this Chapter, the Administrator may require the applicant to install permanent signs along the boundary of a wetland or buffer. a. Permanent signs shall be made of an enamel-coated metal face and attached to a metal post or another non-treated material of equal durability. Signs must be posted at an interval of one (1) every fifty (50) feet, or one (1) per lot if the lot is less than fifty (50) feet wide, and must be maintained by the property owner in perpetuity. The signs shall be worded as follows or with alternative language approved by the Administrator: Protected Wetland Area Do Not Disturb Contact [Local Jurisdiction] Regarding Uses, Restrictions, and Opportunities for Stewardship b. The provisions of Subsection (a) may be modified as necessary to assure protection of sensitive features or wildlife. 3. Fencing a. The applicant shall be required to install a permanent fence around the wetland or buffer when domestic grazing animals are present or may be introduced on site. b. Fencing installed as part of a proposed activity or as required in this Subsection shall be designed so as to not interfere with species migration, including fish runs, and shall be constructed in a manner that minimizes impacts to the wetland and associated habitat. 4.4.b Packet Pg. 164 Attachment: Exhibit 2: Wetland Guidance for CAO Updates Publication No. 16-06-001 (Critical Area Regulations for Wetlands) Wetlands Guidance for CAO Updates Western Washington Version Page 35 XX.060 Critical Area Report for Wetlands A. If the Administrator determines that the site of a proposed development includes, is likely to include, or is adjacent to a wetland, a wetland report, prepared by a qualified professional, shall be required. The expense of preparing the wetland report shall be borne by the applicant. B. Minimum Standards for Wetland Reports. The written report and the accompanying plan sheets shall contain the following information, at a minimum: 1. The written report shall include at a minimum: a. The name and contact information of the applicant; the name, qualifications, and contact information for the primary author(s) of the wetland critical area report; a description of the proposal; identification of all the local, state, and/or federal wetland-related permit(s) required for the project; and a vicinity map for the project. b. A statement specifying the accuracy of the report and all assumptions made and relied upon. c. Documentation of any fieldwork performed on the site, including field data sheets for delineations, rating system forms, baseline hydrologic data, etc. d. A description of the methodologies used to conduct the wetland delineations, wetland ratings, or impact analyses, including references. e. Identification and characterization of all critical areas, wetlands, water bodies, shorelines, floodplains, and buffers on or adjacent to the proposed project area. For areas off site of the project site, estimate conditions within 300 feet of the project boundaries using the best available information. f. For each wetland identified on site and within 300 feet of the project boundary, provide: the wetland rating, including a description of and score for each function, per Wetland Ratings (Section XX.020.B) of this Chapter; required buffers; hydrogeomorphic classification; wetland acreage based on a professional survey from the field delineation (acreages for on-site portion or estimate entire wetland area including off-site portions); Cowardin classification of vegetation communities; habitat elements; soil conditions based on site assessment and/or soil survey information; and to the extent possible, hydrologic information such as location and condition of inlets/outlets (if they can be legally accessed), estimated water depths within the wetland, and estimated hydroperiod patterns based on visual cues (e.g., 4.4.b Packet Pg. 165 Attachment: Exhibit 2: Wetland Guidance for CAO Updates Publication No. 16-06-001 (Critical Area Regulations for Wetlands) Wetlands Guidance for CAO Updates Western Washington Version Page 36 algal mats, drift lines, flood debris, etc.). Provide acreage estimates, classifications, and ratings based on entire wetland complexes, not only the portion present on the proposed project site. g. A description of the proposed actions, including an estimation of acreages of impacts to wetlands and buffers based on the field delineation and survey and an analysis of site development alternatives, including a no-development alternative. h. An assessment of the probable cumulative impacts to the wetlands and buffers resulting from the proposed development. i. A description of reasonable efforts made to apply mitigation sequencing pursuant to Mitigation Sequencing (Chapter XX.070.A) to avoid, minimize, and mitigate impacts to critical areas. j. A discussion of measures, including avoidance, minimization, and compensation, proposed to preserve existing wetlands and restore any wetlands that were degraded prior to the current proposed land-use activity. k. A conservation strategy for habitat and native vegetation that addresses methods to protect and enhance on-site habitat and wetland functions. l. An evaluation of the functions of the wetland and its buffer. Include references for the method used and data sheets. 2. A copy of the site plan sheet(s) for the project must be included with the written report and must include, at a minimum: a. Maps (to scale) depicting delineated and surveyed wetland and required buffers on site, including buffers for off-site critical areas that extend onto the project site; the development proposal; other critical areas; grading and clearing limits; and areas of proposed impacts to wetlands and/or buffers (include square footage estimates). b. A depiction of the proposed stormwater management facilities and outlets (to scale) for the development, including estimated areas of intrusion into the buffers of any critical areas. The written report shall contain a discussion of the potential impacts to the wetland(s) associated with anticipated hydroperiod alterations from the project. 4.4.b Packet Pg. 166 Attachment: Exhibit 2: Wetland Guidance for CAO Updates Publication No. 16-06-001 (Critical Area Regulations for Wetlands) Wetlands Guidance for CAO Updates Western Washington Version Page 37 XX.070 Compensatory Mitigation. A. Mitigation Sequencing. Before impacting any wetland or its buffer, an applicant shall demonstrate that the following actions have been taken. Actions are listed in the order of preference: 1. Avoid the impact altogether by not taking a certain action or parts of an action. 2. Minimize impacts by limiting the degree or magnitude of the action and its implementation, by using appropriate technology, or by taking affirmative steps to avoid or reduce impacts. 3. Rectify the impact by repairing, rehabilitating, or restoring the affected environment. 4. Reduce or eliminate the impact over time by preservation and maintenance operations. 5. Compensate for the impact by replacing, enhancing, or providing substitute resources or environments. 6. Monitor the required compensation and take remedial or corrective measures when necessary. B. Requirements for Compensatory Mitigation: 1. Compensatory mitigation for alterations to wetlands shall be used only for impacts that cannot be avoided or minimized and shall achieve equivalent or greater biologic functions. Compensatory mitigation plans shall be consistent with Wetland Mitigation in Washington State–Part 2: Developing Mitigation Plans—Version 1, (Ecology Publication #06-06- 011b, Olympia, WA, March 2006, or as revised), and Selecting Wetland Mitigation Sites Using a Watershed Approach (Western Washington) (Publication #09-06-32, Olympia, WA, December 2009). 2. Mitigation ratios shall be consistent with Subsection H of this Chapter. 3. Mitigation requirements may also be determined using the credit/debit tool described in Calculating Credits and Debits for Compensatory Mitigation in Wetlands of Western Washington: Final Report (Ecology Publication #10-06-011, Olympia, WA, March 2012, or as revised) consistent with subsection H of this Chapter. C. Compensating for Lost or Affected Functions. Compensatory mitigation shall address the functions affected by the proposed project, with an intention to achieve functional equivalency or improvement of functions. The goal shall be for the 4.4.b Packet Pg. 167 Attachment: Exhibit 2: Wetland Guidance for CAO Updates Publication No. 16-06-001 (Critical Area Regulations for Wetlands) Wetlands Guidance for CAO Updates Western Washington Version Page 38 compensatory mitigation to provide similar wetland functions as those lost, except when either: 1. The lost wetland provides minimal functions, and the proposed compensatory mitigation action(s) will provide equal or greater functions or will provide functions shown to be limiting within a watershed through a formal Washington state watershed assessment plan or protocol; or 2. Out-of-kind replacement of wetland type or functions will best meet watershed goals formally identified by the City, such as replacement of historically diminished wetland types. D. Approaches to Compensatory Mitigation. Mitigation for lost or diminished wetland and buffer functions shall rely on the approaches listed below. 1. Wetland mitigation banks. Credits from a certified wetland mitigation bank may be used to compensate for impacts located within the service area specified in the mitigation bank instrument. Use of credits from a wetland mitigation bank certified under Chapter 173-700 WAC is allowed if: a. The approval authority determines that it would provide appropriate compensation for the proposed impacts; and b. The impact site is located in the service area of the bank. c. The proposed use of credits is consistent with the terms and conditions of the certified mitigation bank instrument. d. Replacement ratios for projects using bank credits is consistent with replacement ratios specified in the certified mitigation bank instrument. 2. In-Lieu Fee Mitigation: Credits from an approved in-lieu-fee program may be used when all of the following apply: a. The approval authority determines that it would provide environmentally appropriate compensation for the proposed impacts. b. The proposed use of credits is consistent with the terms and conditions of the approved in-lieu-fee program instrument. c. Projects using in-lieu-fee credits shall have debits associated with the proposed impacts calculated by the applicant’s qualified wetland professional using the credit assessment method specified in the approved instrument for the in-lieu-fee program. 4.4.b Packet Pg. 168 Attachment: Exhibit 2: Wetland Guidance for CAO Updates Publication No. 16-06-001 (Critical Area Regulations for Wetlands) Wetlands Guidance for CAO Updates Western Washington Version Page 39 d. The impacts are located within the service area specified in the approved in-lieu-fee instrument. 3. Permittee-responsible mitigation. In this situation, the permittee performs the mitigation after the permit is issued and is ultimately responsible for implementation and success of the mitigation. Permittee-responsible mitigation may occur at the site of the permitted impacts or at an off-site location within the same watershed. Permittee-responsible mitigation shall be used only if the applicant’s qualified wetland professional demonstrates to the approval authority’s satisfaction that the proposed approach is ecologically preferable to use of a bank or ILF program, consistent with the criteria in this section. E. Types of Compensatory Mitigation. Mitigation for lost or diminished wetland and buffer functions shall rely on a type listed below in order of preference. A lower- preference form of mitigation shall be used only if the applicant’s qualified wetland professional demonstrates to the approval authority’s satisfaction that all higher-ranked types of mitigation are not viable, consistent with the criteria in this section. 1. Restoration: The manipulation of the physical, chemical, or biological characteristics of a site with the goal of returning natural or historic functions to a former or degraded wetland. For the purpose of tracking net gains in wetland acres, restoration is divided into: a. Re-establishment: The manipulation of the physical, chemical, or biological characteristics of a site with the goal of returning natural or historic functions to a former wetland. Re-establishment results in a gain in wetland acres (and functions). Activities could include removing fill material, plugging ditches, or breaking drain tiles. b. Rehabilitation: The manipulation of the physical, chemical, or biological characteristics of a site with the goal of repairing natural or historic functions of a degraded wetland. Rehabilitation results in a gain in wetland function but does not result in a gain in wetland acres. Activities could involve breaching a dike to reconnect wetlands to a floodplain or return tidal influence to a wetland. 2. Establishment (Creation): The manipulation of the physical, chemical, or biological characteristics of a site to develop a wetland on an upland or deepwater site where a wetland did not previously exist. Establishment results in a gain in wetland acres. Activities typically involve excavation of upland soils to elevations that will produce a wetland hydroperiod, create hydric soils, and support the growth of hydrophytic plant species. a. If a site is not available for wetland restoration to compensate for expected wetland and/or buffer impacts, the approval authority may 4.4.b Packet Pg. 169 Attachment: Exhibit 2: Wetland Guidance for CAO Updates Publication No. 16-06-001 (Critical Area Regulations for Wetlands) Wetlands Guidance for CAO Updates Western Washington Version Page 40 authorize creation of a wetland and buffer upon demonstration by the applicant’s qualified wetland professional that: i. The hydrology and soil conditions at the proposed mitigation site are conducive for sustaining the proposed wetland and that creation of a wetland at the site will not likely cause hydrologic problems elsewhere; ii. Adjacent land uses and site conditions do not jeopardize the viability of the proposed wetland and buffer (e.g., due to the presence of invasive plants or noxious weeds, stormwater runoff, noise, light, or other impacts); and iii. The proposed wetland and buffer will eventually be self-sustaining with little or no long-term maintenance. 3. Enhancement. The manipulation of the physical, chemical, or biological characteristics of a wetland site to heighten, intensify, or improve specific function(s) or to change the growth stage or composition of the vegetation present. Enhancement is undertaken for specified purposes such as water quality improvement, flood water retention, or wildlife habitat. Enhancement results in a change in some wetland functions and can lead to a decline in other wetland functions, but does not result in a gain in wetland acres. Activities typically consist of planting vegetation, controlling non-native or invasive species, modifying site elevations or the proportion of open water to influence hydroperiods, or some combination of these activities. Applicants proposing to enhance wetlands or associated buffers shall demonstrate how the proposed enhancement will increase the wetland’s/buffer’s functions, how this increase in function will adequately compensate for the impacts, and how existing wetland functions at the mitigation site will be protected. 4. Protection/Maintenance (Preservation). Removing a threat to, or preventing the decline of, wetland conditions by an action in or near a wetland. This includes the purchase of land or easements, or repairing water control structures or fences. This term also includes activities commonly associated with the term preservation. Preservation does not result in a gain of wetland acres. Permanent protection of a Category I or II wetland and associated buffer at risk of degradation can be used only if: a. The approval authority determines that the proposed preservation is the best mitigation option; b. The proposed preservation site is under threat of undesirable ecological change due to permitted, planned, or likely actions that will not be adequately mitigated under existing regulations; 4.4.b Packet Pg. 170 Attachment: Exhibit 2: Wetland Guidance for CAO Updates Publication No. 16-06-001 (Critical Area Regulations for Wetlands) Wetlands Guidance for CAO Updates Western Washington Version Page 41 c. The area proposed for preservation is of high quality or critical for the health of the watershed or basin due to its location. Some of the following features may be indicative of high-quality sites: i. Category I or II wetland rating (using the wetland rating system for western Washington) ii. Rare or irreplaceable wetland type (for example, bogs, mature forested wetlands, estuarine wetlands) or aquatic habitat that is rare or a limited resource in the area; iii. The presence of habitat for priority or locally important wildlife species; or also list has provides biological and/or hydrological connectivity; iv. Provides biololgical and/or hydrological connectivity; v. Priority sites in an adopted watershed plan. d. Permanent preservation of the wetland and buffer will be provided through a conservation easement or tract held by an appropriate natural land resource manager, such as a land trust. e. The approval authority may approve other legal and administrative mechanisms in lieu of a conservation easement if it determines they are adequate to protect the site. f. Ratios for preservation in combination with other forms of mitigation generally range from 10:1 to 20:1, as determined on a case-by-case basis, depending on the quality of the wetlands being impacted and the quality of the wetlands being preserved. Ratios for preservation as the sole means of mitigation generally start at 20:1. F. Location of Compensatory Mitigation. Compensatory mitigation actions shall generally be conducted within the same sub-drainage basin and on the site of the alteration except when the applicant can demonstrate that off-site mitigation is ecologically preferable. The following criteria will be evaluated when determining whether the proposal is ecologically preferable. When considering off-site mitigation, preference should be given to using alternative mitigation, such as a mitigation bank, an in-lieu-fee program, or advance mitigation. 1. There are no reasonable opportunities on site or within the sub-drainage basin (e.g., on-site options would require elimination of high-functioning upland habitat), or opportunities on site or within the sub-drainage basin do not have a high likelihood of success based on a determination of the capacity of the site to compensate for the impacts. Considerations should 4.4.b Packet Pg. 171 Attachment: Exhibit 2: Wetland Guidance for CAO Updates Publication No. 16-06-001 (Critical Area Regulations for Wetlands) Wetlands Guidance for CAO Updates Western Washington Version Page 42 include: anticipated replacement ratios for wetland mitigation, buffer conditions and required widths, available water to maintain anticipated hydrogeomorphic classes of wetlands when restored, proposed flood storage capacity, and potential to mitigate riparian fish and wildlife impacts (such as connectivity); 2. On-site mitigation would require elimination of high-quality upland habitat. 3. Off-site mitigation has a greater likelihood of providing equal or improved wetland functions than the altered wetland. 4. Off-site locations shall be in the same sub-drainage basin unless: a. Established watershed goals for water quality, flood storage or conveyance, habitat, or other wetland functions have been established by the City and strongly justify location of mitigation at another site; or b. Credits from a state-certified wetland mitigation bank are used as compensation, and the use of credits is consistent with the terms of the certified bank instrument; c. Fees are paid to an approved in-lieu-fee program to compensate for the impacts. 5. The design for the compensatory mitigation project needs to be appropriate for its location (i.e., position in the landscape). Therefore, compensatory mitigation should not result in the creation, restoration, or enhancement of an atypical wetland. G. Timing of Compensatory Mitigation. It is preferred that compensatory mitigation projects be completed prior to activities that will impact wetlands. At the least, compensatory mitigation shall be completed immediately following disturbance and prior to use or occupancy of the action or development. Construction of mitigation projects shall be timed to reduce impacts to existing fisheries, wildlife, and flora. 1. The Administrator may authorize a one-time temporary delay in completing construction or installation of the compensatory mitigation when the applicant provides a written explanation from a qualified wetland professional as to the rationale for the delay. An appropriate rationale would include identification of the environmental conditions that could produce a high probability of failure or significant construction difficulties (e.g., project delay lapses past a fisheries window, or installing plants should be delayed until the dormant season to ensure greater survival of installed materials). The delay shall not create or perpetuate hazardous conditions or environmental damage or degradation, and the 4.4.b Packet Pg. 172 Attachment: Exhibit 2: Wetland Guidance for CAO Updates Publication No. 16-06-001 (Critical Area Regulations for Wetlands) Wetlands Guidance for CAO Updates Western Washington Version Page 43 delay shall not be injurious to the health, safety, or general welfare of the public. The request for the temporary delay must include a written justification that documents the environmental constraints that preclude implementation of the compensatory mitigation plan. The justification must be verified and approved by the City. H. Wetland Mitigation Ratios3: Category and Type of Wetland Creation or Re-establishment Rehabilitation Enhancement Category I: Bog, Natural Heritage site Not considered possible Case by case Case by case Category I: Mature Forested 6:1 12:1 24:1 Category I: Based on functions 4:1 8:1 16:1 Category II 3:1 6:1 12:1 Category III 2:1 4:1 8:1 Category IV 1.5:1 3:1 6:1 I. Credit/Debit Method. To more fully protect functions and values, and as an alternative to the mitigation ratios found in the joint guidance Wetland Mitigation in Washington State Parts I and II (Ecology Publication #06-06-011a-b, Olympia, WA, March 2006), the administrator may allow mitigation based on the “credit/debit” method developed by the Department of Ecology in Calculating Credits and Debits for Compensatory Mitigation in Wetlands of Western Washington: Final Report, (Ecology Publication #10-06-011, Olympia, WA, March 2012, or as revised). 3 Ratios for rehabilitation and enhancement may be reduced when combined with 1:1 replacement through creation or re-establishment. See Table 1a, Wetland Mitigation in Washington State – Part 1: Agency Policies and Guidance –Version 1, (Ecology Publication #06-06-011a, Olympia, WA, March 2006 or as revised). See also Paragraph D.4 for more information on using preservation as compensation. 4.4.b Packet Pg. 173 Attachment: Exhibit 2: Wetland Guidance for CAO Updates Publication No. 16-06-001 (Critical Area Regulations for Wetlands) Wetlands Guidance for CAO Updates Western Washington Version Page 44 J. Compensatory Mitigation Plan. When a project involves wetland and/or buffer impacts, a compensatory mitigation plan prepared by a qualified professional shall be required, meeting the following minimum standards: 1. Wetland Critical Area Report. A critical area report for wetlands must accompany or be included in the compensatory mitigation plan and include the minimum parameters described in Minimum Standards for Wetland Reports (Section XX.060.B) of this Chapter. 2. Compensatory Mitigation Report. The report must include a written report and plan sheets that contain, at a minimum, the following elements. Full guidance can be found in Wetland Mitigation in Washington State– Part 2: Developing Mitigation Plans (Version 1) (Ecology Publication #06-06- 011b, Olympia, WA, March 2006 or as revised). a. The written report must contain, at a minimum: i. The name and contact information of the applicant; the name, qualifications, and contact information for the primary author(s) of the compensatory mitigation report; a description of the proposal; a summary of the impacts and proposed compensation concept; identification of all the local, state, and/or federal wetland-related permit(s) required for the project; and a vicinity map for the project. ii. Description of how the project design has been modified to avoid, minimize, or reduce adverse impacts to wetlands. iii. Description of the existing wetland and buffer areas proposed to be altered. Include acreage (or square footage), water regime, vegetation, soils, landscape position, surrounding land uses, and functions. Also describe impacts in terms of acreage by Cowardin classification, hydrogeomorphic classification, and wetland rating, based on Wetland Ratings (Section XX.XX) of this Chapter. iv. Description of the compensatory mitigation site, including location and rationale for selection. Include an assessment of existing conditions: acreage (or square footage) of wetlands and uplands, water regime, sources of water, vegetation, soils, landscape position, surrounding land uses, and functions. Estimate future conditions in this location if the compensation actions are NOT undertaken (i.e., how would this site progress through natural succession?). v. Surface and subsurface hydrologic conditions, including an analysis of existing and proposed hydrologic regimes for enhanced, created, or restored compensatory mitigation areas. 4.4.b Packet Pg. 174 Attachment: Exhibit 2: Wetland Guidance for CAO Updates Publication No. 16-06-001 (Critical Area Regulations for Wetlands) Wetlands Guidance for CAO Updates Western Washington Version Page 45 Include illustrations of how data for existing hydrologic conditions were used to determine the estimates of future hydrologic conditions vi. A description of the proposed actions for compensation of wetland and upland areas affected by the project. Include overall goals of the proposed mitigation, including a description of the targeted functions, hydrogeomorphic classification, and categories of wetlands. vii. A description of the proposed mitigation construction activities and timing of activities. viii. Performance standards (measurable standards for years post- installation) for upland and wetland communities, a monitoring schedule, and a maintenance schedule and actions proposed by year. ix. A discussion of ongoing management practices that will protect wetlands after the development project has been implemented, including proposed monitoring and maintenance programs (for remaining wetlands and compensatory mitigation wetlands). x. A bond estimate for the entire compensatory mitigation project, including the following elements: site preparation, plant materials, construction materials, installation oversight, maintenance twice per year for up to five (5) years, annual monitoring field work and reporting, and contingency actions for a maximum of the total required number of years for monitoring. xi. Proof of establishment of Notice on Title for the wetlands and buffers on the project site, including the compensatory mitigation areas. b. The scaled plan sheets for the compensatory mitigation must contain, at a minimum: i. Surveyed edges of the existing wetland and buffers, proposed areas of wetland and/or buffer impacts, location of proposed wetland and/or buffer compensation actions. ii. Existing topography, ground-proofed, at two-foot contour intervals in the zone of the proposed compensation actions if any grading activity is proposed in the compensation area(s). Also include existing cross-sections (estimated one-foot intervals) of wetland areas on the development site that are proposed to be altered and for the proposed areas of wetland or buffer compensation. 4.4.b Packet Pg. 175 Attachment: Exhibit 2: Wetland Guidance for CAO Updates Publication No. 16-06-001 (Critical Area Regulations for Wetlands) Wetlands Guidance for CAO Updates Western Washington Version Page 46 iii. Conditions expected from the proposed actions on site, including future hydrogeomorphic types, vegetation community types by dominant species (wetland and upland), and future water regimes. iv. Required wetland buffers for existing wetlands and proposed compensation areas. Also identify any zones where buffers are proposed to be reduced or enlarged outside of the standards identified in this Chapter. v. A planting plan for the compensation area, including all species by proposed community type and water regime, size and type of plant material to be installed, spacing of plants, typical clustering patterns, total number of each species by community type, and timing of installation. K. Buffer Mitigation Ratios. Impacts to buffers shall be mitigated at a minimum 1:1 ratio. Compensatory buffer mitigation shall replace those buffer functions lost from development. L. Protection of the Mitigation Site. The mitigation area and any associated buffer shall be located in a critical area tract or a conservation easement consistent with Chapter XX.XX. M. Monitoring. Mitigation monitoring shall be required for a period necessary to establish that performance standards have been met, but not for a period less than five years. If a scrub-shrub or forested vegetation community is proposed, monitoring may be required for ten years or more. The project mitigation plan shall include monitoring elements that ensure certainty of success for the project’s natural resource values and functions. If the mitigation goals are not obtained within the initial five-year period, the applicant remains responsible for restoration of the natural resource values and functions until the mitigation goals agreed to in the mitigation plan are achieved. N. Advance Mitigation. Mitigation for projects with pre-identified impacts to wetlands may be constructed in advance of the impacts if the mitigation is implemented according to federal rules, state policy on advance mitigation, and state water quality regulations consistent with Interagency Regulatory Guide: Advance Permittee- Responsible Mitigation (Ecology Publication #12-06-015, Olympia, WA, December 2012). O. Alternative Mitigation Plans. The Administrator may approve alternative wetland mitigation plans that are based on best available science, such as priority restoration plans that achieve restoration goals identified in the SMP. Alternative mitigation proposals must provide an equivalent or better level of protection of wetland functions and values than would be provided by the strict application of this chapter. The Administrator shall consider the following for approval of an alternative mitigation proposal: 4.4.b Packet Pg. 176 Attachment: Exhibit 2: Wetland Guidance for CAO Updates Publication No. 16-06-001 (Critical Area Regulations for Wetlands) Wetlands Guidance for CAO Updates Western Washington Version Page 47 1. The proposal uses a watershed approach consistent with Selecting Wetland Mitigation Sites Using a Watershed Approach (Western Washington) (Ecology Publication #09-06-32, Olympia, WA, December 2009). 2. Creation or enhancement of a larger system of natural areas and open space is preferable to the preservation of many individual habitat areas. 3. Mitigation according to Section E is not feasible due to site constraints such as parcel size, stream type, wetland category, or geologic hazards. 4. There is clear potential for success of the proposed mitigation at the proposed mitigation site. 5. The plan shall contain clear and measurable standards for achieving compliance with the specific provisions of the plan. A monitoring plan shall, at a minimum, meet the provisions in Section J. 6. The plan shall be reviewed and approved as part of overall approval of the proposed use. 7. A wetland of a different type may be justified based on regional needs or functions and values; the replacement ratios may not be reduced or eliminated unless the reduction results in a preferred environmental alternative. 8. Mitigation guarantees shall meet the minimum requirements as outlined in Section J.2.a.viii. 9. Qualified professionals in each of the critical areas addressed shall prepare the plan. 10. The City may consult with agencies with expertise and jurisdiction over the critical areas during the review to assist with analysis and identification of appropriate performance measures that adequately safeguard critical areas. XX.080 Unauthorized Alterations and Enforcement A. When a wetland or its buffer has been altered in violation of this Chapter, all ongoing development work shall stop, and the critical area shall be restored. The City shall have the authority to issue a “stop-work” order to cease all ongoing development work and order restoration, rehabilitation, or replacement measures at the owner’s or other responsible party’s expense to compensate for violation of provisions of this Chapter. 4.4.b Packet Pg. 177 Attachment: Exhibit 2: Wetland Guidance for CAO Updates Publication No. 16-06-001 (Critical Area Regulations for Wetlands) Wetlands Guidance for CAO Updates Western Washington Version Page 48 B. Requirement for Restoration Plan. All development work shall remain stopped until a restoration plan is prepared and approved by the City. Such a plan shall be prepared by a qualified professional using the currently accepted scientific principles and shall describe how the actions proposed meet the minimum requirements described in Subsection C below. The Administrator shall, at the applicant or other responsible party’s expense, seek expert advice in determining the adequacy of the plan. Inadequate plans shall be returned to the applicant or other responsible party for revision and re- submittal. C. Minimum Performance Standards for Restoration. The following minimum performance standards shall be met for the restoration of a wetland, provided that if the applicant or other responsible party can demonstrate that greater functions and habitat values can be obtained, these standards may be modified: 1. The historic structure, functions, and values of the affected wetland shall be restored, including water quality and habitat functions. 2. The historic soil types and configuration shall be restored to the extent practicable. 3. The wetland and buffers shall be replanted with native vegetation that replicates the vegetation historically found on the site in species types, sizes, and densities. The historic functions and values should be replicated at the location of the alteration. 4. Information demonstrating compliance with other applicable provisions of this Chapter shall be submitted to the Administrator. D. Site Investigations. The Administrator is authorized to make site inspections and take such actions as are necessary to enforce this Chapter. The Administrator shall present proper credentials and make a reasonable effort to contact any property owner before entering onto private property. E. Penalties. Any person, party, firm, corporation, or other legal entity convicted of violating any of the provisions of this Chapter shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. 1. Each day or portion of a day during which a violation of this Chapter is committed or continued shall constitute a separate offense. Any development carried out contrary to the provisions of this Chapter shall constitute a public nuisance and may be enjoined as provided by the statutes of the state of Washington. The City may levy civil penalties against any person, party, firm, corporation, or other legal entity for violation of any of the provisions of this Chapter. The civil penalty shall be assessed at a maximum rate of $XX dollars per day per violation. 2. If the wetland affected cannot be restored, monies collected as penalties shall be deposited in a dedicated account for the preservation or 4.4.b Packet Pg. 178 Attachment: Exhibit 2: Wetland Guidance for CAO Updates Publication No. 16-06-001 (Critical Area Regulations for Wetlands) Wetlands Guidance for CAO Updates Western Washington Version Page 49 restoration of landscape processes and functions in the watershed in which the affected wetland is located. The City may coordinate its preservation or restoration activities with other cities in the watershed to optimize the effectiveness of the restoration action. 4.4.b Packet Pg. 179 Attachment: Exhibit 2: Wetland Guidance for CAO Updates Publication No. 16-06-001 (Critical Area Regulations for Wetlands) Wetlands Guidance for CAO Updates Western Washington Version Page 50 This page is purposely left blank 4.4.b Packet Pg. 180 Attachment: Exhibit 2: Wetland Guidance for CAO Updates Publication No. 16-06-001 (Critical Area Regulations for Wetlands) Wetlands Guidance for CAO Updates Western Washington Version Page 51 Appendix B - Wetland Definitions (Western Washington) 4.4.b Packet Pg. 181 Attachment: Exhibit 2: Wetland Guidance for CAO Updates Publication No. 16-06-001 (Critical Area Regulations for Wetlands) Wetlands Guidance for CAO Updates Western Washington Version Page 52 This page is purposely left blank 4.4.b Packet Pg. 182 Attachment: Exhibit 2: Wetland Guidance for CAO Updates Publication No. 16-06-001 (Critical Area Regulations for Wetlands) Wetlands Guidance for CAO Updates Western Washington Version Page 53 Appendix B – Wetland Definitions Agricultural Activities, Existing and Ongoing – Those activities conducted on lands defined in RCW 84.34.020(2), and those activities involved in the production of crops and livestock, including but not limited to operation, maintenance and conservation measures of farm and stock ponds or drainage ditches, irrigation systems, changes between agricultural activities, and normal operation, maintenance or repair of existing serviceable structures, facilities or improved areas. Activities which bring an area into agricultural use are not part of an ongoing activity. An operation ceases to be ongoing when the area in which it was conducted is proposed for conversion to a nonagricultural use or has lain idle for a period of longer than five years, unless the idle land is registered in a federal or state soils conversation program. Alteration – Any human-induced change in an existing condition of a critical area or its buffer. Alterations include, but are not limited to, grading, filling, channelizing, dredging, clearing of vegetation, construction, compaction, excavation, or any other activity that changes the character of the critical area. Best Available Science – Current scientific information used in the process to designate, protect, or restore critical areas; that is, derived from a valid scientific process as defined by WAC 365-195-900 through 925. Best Management Practices (BMPs) – Conservation practices or systems of practices and management measures that: (a) Control soil loss and reduce water quality degradation caused by high concentrations of nutrients, animal waste, toxics, or sediment; (b) Minimize adverse impacts to surface water and ground water flow and circulation patterns and to the chemical, physical, and biological characteristics of wetlands; (c) Protect trees, vegetation, and soils designated to be retained during and following site construction and use native plant species appropriate to the site for re-vegetation of disturbed areas; and (d) Provide standards for proper use of chemical herbicides within critical areas. Bog – A low-nutrient, acidic wetland with organic soils and characteristic bog plants, as described in Washington State Wetland Rating System for Western Washington: 2014 Update (Washington State Department of Ecology Publication #14-06-29, Olympia, WA, October 2014). Buffer or Buffer Zone – The area contiguous with a critical area that maintains the functions and/or structural stability of the critical area. 4.4.b Packet Pg. 183 Attachment: Exhibit 2: Wetland Guidance for CAO Updates Publication No. 16-06-001 (Critical Area Regulations for Wetlands) Wetlands Guidance for CAO Updates Western Washington Version Page 54 Coastal Lagoon – A shallow body of water partly or completely separated from the sea by a barrier beach that receives periodic influxes of salt water, as described in Washington State Wetland Rating System for Western Washington: 2014 Update (Washington State Department of Ecology Publication #14-06-29, Olympia, WA, October 2014). Critical Areas – Critical areas include any of the following areas or ecosystems: critical aquifer recharge areas, fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas, geologically hazardous areas, frequently flooded areas, and wetlands, as defined in RCW 36.70A and this Chapter. Creation – The manipulation of the physical, chemical, or biological characteristics to develop a wetland on an upland or deepwater site where a wetland did not previously exist. Creation results in a gain in wetland acreage and function. A typical action is the excavation of upland soils to elevations that will produce a wetland hydroperiod and hydric soils, and support the growth of hydrophytic plant species. Cumulative Impacts or Effects – The combined, incremental effects of human activity on ecological or critical area functions and values. Cumulative impacts result when the effects of an action are added to or interact with the effects of other actions in a particular place and within a particular time. It is the combination of these effects, and any resulting environmental degradation, that should be the focus of cumulative impact analysis and changes to policies and permitting decisions. Development – A land use consisting of the construction or exterior alteration of structures; grading, dredging, drilling, or dumping; filling; removal of sand, gravel, or minerals; bulk heading; driving of pilings; or any project of a temporary or permanent nature which modifies structures, land, wetlands, or shorelines and which does not fall within the allowable exemptions contained in the City Code. Enhancement – The manipulation of the physical, chemical, or biological characteristics of a wetland to heighten, intensify, or improve specific function(s) or to change the growth stage or composition of the vegetation present. Enhancement is undertaken for specified purposes such as water quality improvement, flood water retention, or wildlife habitat. Enhancement results in a change in wetland function(s) and can lead to a decline in other wetland functions, but does not result in a gain in wetland acres. Examples are planting vegetation, controlling non-native or invasive species, and modifying site elevations to alter hydroperiods. Estuarine Wetland – A vegetated wetland with a water regime that is predominately tidal, as described in Washington State Wetland Rating System for Western Washington: 2014 Update (Washington State Department of Ecology Publication #14-06-29, Olympia, WA, October 2014). Functions and Values – The services provided by critical areas to society, including, but not limited to, improving and maintaining water quality, providing fish and wildlife habitat, supporting terrestrial and aquatic food chains, reducing flooding and erosive 4.4.b Packet Pg. 184 Attachment: Exhibit 2: Wetland Guidance for CAO Updates Publication No. 16-06-001 (Critical Area Regulations for Wetlands) Wetlands Guidance for CAO Updates Western Washington Version Page 55 flows, wave attenuation, historical or archaeological importance, educational opportunities, and recreation. Growth Management Act – RCW 36.70A and 36.70B, as amended. Hazardous Substances – Any liquid, solid, gas, or sludge, including any material, substance, product, commodity, or waste, regardless of quantity, that exhibits any of the physical, chemical, or biological properties described in WAC 173-303-090 or 173-303- 100. Impervious Surface – A surface area which either prevents or retards the entry of water into the soil mantle as under natural conditions prior to development. A non-vegetated surface area which causes water to run off the surface in greater quantities or at an increased rate of flow from the flow present under pre-development or pre-developed conditions. Common impervious surfaces include, but are not limited to, roof tops, walkways, patios, driveways, parking lots or storage areas, concrete or asphalt paving, gravel roads, packed earthen materials, and oiled, macadam or other surfaces which similarly impede the natural infiltration of stormwater. In-Kind Compensation – To replace critical areas with substitute areas whose characteristics and functions closely approximate those destroyed or degraded by a regulated activity. In-Lieu-Fee Program – An agreement between a regulatory agency (state, federal, or local) and a single sponsor, generally a public natural resource agency or non-profit organization. Under an in-lieu-fee agreement, the mitigation sponsor collects funds from an individual or a number of individuals who are required to conduct compensatory mitigation required under a wetland regulatory program. The sponsor may use the funds pooled from multiple permittees to create one or a number of sites under the authority of the agreement to satisfy the permittees’ required mitigation. Infiltration – The downward entry of water into the immediate surface of soil. Interdunal Wetland – A wetland that forms in the deflation plains and swales that are geomorphic features in areas of coastal dunes, as described in Washington State Wetland Rating System for Western Washington: 2014 Update (Washington State Department of Ecology. Isolated Wetland – A wetland that is hydrologically isolated from other aquatic resources, as determined by the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). Isolated wetlands may perform important functions and are protected by state law (RCW 90.48) whether or not they are protected by federal law. Mature and Old-Growth Forested Wetland – A wetland having at least 1 contiguous acre of either old-growth forest or mature forest, as described in Washington State Wetland Rating System for Western Washington: 2014 Update (Washington State Department of Ecology Publication #14-06-29, Olympia, WA, October 2014). 4.4.b Packet Pg. 185 Attachment: Exhibit 2: Wetland Guidance for CAO Updates Publication No. 16-06-001 (Critical Area Regulations for Wetlands) Wetlands Guidance for CAO Updates Western Washington Version Page 56 Mitigation – Avoiding, minimizing, or compensating for adverse critical areas impacts. Mitigation, in the following sequential order of preference, is: (a) Avoiding the impact altogether by not taking a certain action or parts of an action; (b) Minimizing impacts by limiting the degree or magnitude of the action and its implementation by using appropriate technology or by taking affirmative steps to avoid or reduce impacts; (c) Rectifying the impact to wetlands, critical aquifer recharge areas, and habitat conservation areas by repairing, rehabilitating, or restoring the affected environment to the conditions existing at the time of the initiation of the project; (d) Reducing or eliminating the impact or hazard over time by preservation and maintenance operations during the life of the action; (e) Compensating for the impact to wetlands, critical aquifer recharge areas, and habitat conservation areas by replacing, enhancing, or providing substitute resources or environments; and (f) Monitoring the hazard or other required mitigation and taking remedial action when necessary. Mitigation for individual actions may include a combination of the above measures. Monitoring – Evaluating the impacts of development proposals on the biological, hydrological, and geological elements of such systems, and assessing the performance of required mitigation measures through the collection and analysis of data by various methods for the purpose of understanding and documenting changes in natural ecosystems and features. Monitoring includes gathering baseline data. Native Vegetation – Plant species that occur naturally in a particular region or environment and were present before European colonization. Off-Site Compensation – To replace critical areas away from the site on which a critical area has been impacted. On-Site Compensation – To replace critical areas at or adjacent to the site on which a critical areas has been impacted. Ordinary High Water Mark – That mark which is found by examining the bed and banks of water bodies and ascertaining where the presence and action of waters are so common and usual, and so long continued in all ordinary years, that the soil has a character distinct from that of the abutting upland in respect to vegetation. 4.4.b Packet Pg. 186 Attachment: Exhibit 2: Wetland Guidance for CAO Updates Publication No. 16-06-001 (Critical Area Regulations for Wetlands) Wetlands Guidance for CAO Updates Western Washington Version Page 57 Preservation – The removal of a threat to, or preventing the decline of, wetland conditions by an action in or near a wetland. This term includes the purchase of land or conservation easements, repairing water control structures or fences, or structural protection. Preservation does not result in a gain of wetland acres but may result in a gain in functions over the long term. Project Area – All areas, including those within fifty (50) feet of the area, proposed to be disturbed, altered, or used by the proposed activity or the construction of any proposed structures. When the action binds the land, such as a subdivision, short subdivision, binding site plan, planned unit development, or rezone, the project area shall include the entire parcel, at a minimum. Prior Converted Croplands – Prior converted croplands (PCCs) are defined in federal law as wetlands that were drained, dredged, filled, leveled, or otherwise manipulated, including the removal of woody vegetation, before December 23, 1985, to enable production of an agricultural commodity, and that: 1) have had an agricultural commodity planted or produced at least once prior to December 23, 1985; 2) do not have standing water for more than 14 consecutive days during the growing season, and 3) have not since been abandoned. Qualified Professional – A qualified professional for wetlands must be a professional wetland scientist with at least two years of full-time work experience as a wetlands professional, including delineating wetlands using the federal manual and supplements, preparing wetlands reports, conducting function assessments, and developing and implementing mitigation plans. Re-establishment – The manipulation of the physical, chemical, or biological characteristics of a site with the goal of returning natural or historic functions to a former wetland. Re-establishment results in rebuilding a former wetland and results in a gain in wetland acres and functions. Activities could include removing fill, plugging ditches, or breaking drain tiles. Rehabilitation – The manipulation of the physical, chemical, or biological characteristics of a site with the goal of repairing natural or historic functions and processes of a degraded wetland. Rehabilitation results in a gain in wetland function but does not result in a gain in wetland acres. Activities could involve breaching a dike to reconnect wetlands to a floodplain or returning tidal influence to a wetland. Repair or Maintenance – An activity that restores the character, scope, size, and design of a serviceable area, structure, or land use to its previously authorized and undamaged condition. Activities that change the character, size, or scope of a project beyond the original design and drain, dredge, fill, flood, or otherwise alter critical areas are not included in this definition. Restoration – Measures taken to restore an altered or damaged natural feature, including: 4.4.b Packet Pg. 187 Attachment: Exhibit 2: Wetland Guidance for CAO Updates Publication No. 16-06-001 (Critical Area Regulations for Wetlands) Wetlands Guidance for CAO Updates Western Washington Version Page 58 (a) Active steps taken to restore damaged wetlands, streams, protected habitat, or their buffers to the functioning condition that existed prior to an unauthorized alteration; and (b) Actions performed to re-establish structural and functional characteristics of a critical area that have been lost by alteration, past management activities, or catastrophic events. SEPA – Washington State Environmental Policy Act, 43.21C RCW. Service Area – The geographic area within which impacts can be mitigated at a specific mitigation bank or an in-lieu-fee program, as designated in its instrument. Soil Survey – The most recent soil survey for the local area or county by the National Resources Conservation Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture. Species – Any group of animals or plants classified as a species or subspecies as commonly accepted by the scientific community. Species of Local Importance – Those species of local concern designated by the City in Chapter XX.XX due to their population status or their sensitivity to habitat manipulation. Species, Listed -- Any species listed under the federal Endangered Species Act or state endangered, threatened, and sensitive, or priority lists (see WAC 232-12-297 or page 6 of “Priority Habitat and Species List,” Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, 2008, Olympia, Washington. 177 pp.) Stream – An area where open surface water produces a defined channel or bed, not including irrigation ditches, canals, storm or surface water runoff devices, or other entirely artificial watercourses, unless they are used by salmonids or are used to convey a watercourse naturally occurring prior to construction. A channel or bed need not contain water year-round, provided there is evidence of at least intermittent flow during years of normal rainfall. Unavoidable Impacts – Adverse impacts that remain after all appropriate and practicable avoidance and minimization has been achieved. Washington Administration Code (WAC) – Administrative rules implementing state laws. Wetlands – Those areas that are inundated or saturated by surface or ground water at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation adapted for life in saturated soil conditions. Wetlands generally include swamps, marshes, bogs, and similar areas. Wetlands do not include those artificial wetlands intentionally created from non-wetland sites, including, but not limited to, irrigation and drainage ditches, grass-lined swales, canals, detention facilities, wastewater treatment facilities, farm ponds, and landscape amenities, or those wetlands created after July 1, 1990, that were unintentionally created as a result of the construction 4.4.b Packet Pg. 188 Attachment: Exhibit 2: Wetland Guidance for CAO Updates Publication No. 16-06-001 (Critical Area Regulations for Wetlands) Wetlands Guidance for CAO Updates Western Washington Version Page 59 of a road, street, or highway. Wetlands may include those artificial wetlands intentionally created from non-wetland areas to mitigate the conversion of wetlands. Wetland of High Conservation Value – A wetland that has been identified by scientists from the Washington Natural Heritage Program (WHNHP) as an important ecosystem for maintaining plant diversity in Washington State. See http://www.dnr.wa.gov/data- information-natural-heritage-features . Wetland Mitigation Bank – A site where wetlands are restored, created, enhanced, or in exceptional circumstances, preserved, expressly for the purpose of providing compensatory mitigation in advance of unavoidable impacts to wetlands or other aquatic resources that typically are unknown at the time of certification to compensate for future, permitted impacts to similar resources. Wetland Mosaic – An area with a concentration of multiple small wetlands, in which each patch of wetland is less than one acre; on average, patches are less than 100 feet from each other; and areas delineated as vegetated wetland are more than 50% of the total area of the entire mosaic, including uplands and open water. 4.4.b Packet Pg. 189 Attachment: Exhibit 2: Wetland Guidance for CAO Updates Publication No. 16-06-001 (Critical Area Regulations for Wetlands) 4.4.c Packet Pg. 190 Attachment: Exhibit 3: FAQ - July 2018 Modified Habitat Score Ranges (Critical Area Regulations for Wetlands) 4.4.c Packet Pg. 191 Attachment: Exhibit 3: FAQ - July 2018 Modified Habitat Score Ranges (Critical Area Regulations for Wetlands) July 2018 Modifications for Habitat Score Ranges July 2018 Modified from Wetland Guidance for CAO Updates Western Washington Version Ecology Publication No. 16-06-001 Section XX.040 Exemptions and Allowed Uses in Wetlands A.1.d Do not score 6 or more points for habitat function based on the 2014 update to the Washington State Wetland Rating System for Western Washington: 2014 Update (Ecology Publication #14-06-029, or as revised and approved by Ecology) B.9.a The wetland is classified as a Category IV or a Category III wetland with a habitat score of 3-5 points, and XX.050 Wetland Buffers A. Buffer Requirements. The following buffer widths have been established in accordance with the best available science. They are based on the category of wetland and the habitat score as determined by a qualified wetland professional using the Washington State Wetland Rating System for Western Washington: 2014 Update (Ecology Publication #14-06-029, or as revised and approved by Ecology). The adjacent land use intensity is assumed to be high. 1. For wetlands that score 6 points or more for habitat function, the buffers in Table XX.1 can be used if both of the following criteria are met: • A relatively undisturbed, vegetated corridor at least 100 feet wide is protected between the wetland and any other Priority Habitats as defined by the Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife. The latest definitions of priority habitats and their locations are available on the WDFW web site at: http://wdfw.wa.gov/hab/phshabs.htm ) The corridor must be protected for the entire distance between the wetland and the Priority Habitat by some type of legal protection such as a conservation easement. Presence or absence of a nearby habitat must be confirmed by a qualified biologist. If no option for providing a corridor is available, Table XX.1 may be used with the required measures in Table XX.2 alone.1 1 See discussion in the Introduction, page 12 as to whether this applies in small urban jurisdictions. 4.4.d Packet Pg. 192 Attachment: Exhibit 4: Ecology July 2018 Code Recommendations for Modified Habitat Scores (Critical Area Regulations for Wetlands) July 2018 Modifications for Habitat Score Ranges July 2018 Modified from Wetland Guidance for CAO Updates Western Washington Version Ecology Publication No. 16-06-001 • All of the measures in Table XX.2 are implemented, where applicable, to minimize the impacts of the adjacent land uses. 2. For wetlands that score 3-5 habitat points, only the measures in Table XX.2 are required for the use of Table XX.1 3. If an applicant chooses not to apply the mitigation measures in Table XX.2, or is unable to provide a protected corridor where available, then Table XX.3 must be used. 4. The buffer widths in Table XX.1 and XX.3 assume that the buffer is vegetated with a native plant community appropriate for the ecoregion. If the existing buffer is unvegetated, sparsely vegetated, or vegetated with invasive species that do not perform needed functions, the buffer should either be planted to create the appropriate plant community or the buffer should be widened to ensure that adequate functions of the buffer are provided. 4.4.d Packet Pg. 193 Attachment: Exhibit 4: Ecology July 2018 Code Recommendations for Modified Habitat Scores (Critical Area Regulations for Wetlands) July 2018 Modifications for Habitat Score Ranges July 2018 Modified from Wetland Guidance for CAO Updates Western Washington Version Ecology Publication No. 16-06-001 Table XX.1 Wetland Buffer Requirements for Western Washington if Table XX.2 is Implemented and Corridor Provided Buffer width (in feet) based on habitat score Wetland Category 3-5 6-7 8-9 Category I: Based on total score 75 110 225 Category I: Bogs and Wetlands of High Conservation Value 190 225 Category I: Interdunal 225 (buffer width not based on habitat scores) Category I: Forested 75 110 225 Category I: Estuarine and Coastal Lagoons 150 (buffer width not based on habitat scores) Category II: Based on score 75 110 225 Category II: Interdunal Wetlands 110 (buffer width not based on habitat scores) Category II: Estuarine and Coastal Lagoons 110 (buffer width not based on habitat scores) Category III (all) 60 110 225 Category IV (all) 40 4.4.d Packet Pg. 194 Attachment: Exhibit 4: Ecology July 2018 Code Recommendations for Modified Habitat Scores (Critical Area Regulations for Wetlands) July 2018 Modifications for Habitat Score Ranges July 2018 Modified from Wetland Guidance for CAO Updates Western Washington Version Ecology Publication No. 16-06-001 Table XX.2 Required measures to minimize impacts to wetlands (All measures are required if applicable to a specific proposal) Disturbance Required Measures to Minimize Impacts Lights • Direct lights away from wetland Noise • Locate activity that generates noise away from wetland • If warranted, enhance existing buffer with native vegetation plantings adjacent to noise source • For activities that generate relatively continuous, potentially disruptive noise, such as certain heavy industry or mining, establish an additional 10’ heavily vegetated buffer strip immediately adjacent to the outer wetland buffer Toxic runoff • Route all new, untreated runoff away from wetland while ensuring wetland is not dewatered • Establish covenants limiting use of pesticides within 150 ft of wetland • Apply integrated pest management Stormwater runoff • Retrofit stormwater detention and treatment for roads and existing adjacent development • Prevent channelized flow from lawns that directly enters the buffer • Use Low Intensity Development techniques (for more information refer to the drainage ordinance and manual) Change in water regime • Infiltrate or treat, detain, and disperse into buffer new runoff from impervious surfaces and new lawns Pets and human disturbance • Use privacy fencing OR plant dense vegetation to delineate buffer edge and to discourage disturbance using vegetation appropriate for the ecoregion • Place wetland and its buffer in a separate tract or protect with a conservation easement Dust • Use best management practices to control dust 4.4.d Packet Pg. 195 Attachment: Exhibit 4: Ecology July 2018 Code Recommendations for Modified Habitat Scores (Critical Area Regulations for Wetlands) July 2018 Modifications for Habitat Score Ranges July 2018 Modified from Wetland Guidance for CAO Updates Western Washington Version Ecology Publication No. 16-06-001 Table XX.3 Wetland Buffer Requirements for Western Washington if Table XX.2 is NOT Implemented or Corridor NOT provided Buffer width (in feet) based on habitat score Wetland Category 3-5 6-7 8-9 Category I: Based on total score 100 150 300 Category I: Bogs and Wetlands of High Conservation Value 250 300 Category I: Interdunal 300 (buffer width not based on habitat scores) Category I: Forested 100 150 300 Category I: Estuarine and Coastal Lagoons 200 (buffer width not based on habitat scores) Category II: Based on score 100 150 300 Category II: Interdunal Wetlands 150 (buffer width not based on habitat scores) Category II: Estuarine and Coastal Lagoons 150 (buffer width not based on habitat scores) Category III (all) 80 150 300 Category IV (all) 50 4.4.d Packet Pg. 196 Attachment: Exhibit 4: Ecology July 2018 Code Recommendations for Modified Habitat Scores (Critical Area Regulations for Wetlands) Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes September 4, 2018 Page 9 fence was measured. Mr. Lien clarified it was a fence on top of a retaining wall. Councilmember Fraley- Monillas recalled that decision was reversed. Mr. Lien advised it was upheld. With regard to ex-parte contact, in all the years she was on Council and heard appeals, she had only been contacted twice about cases and in both she very professionally said she could not discuss it and that stopped the conversation. She recalled during the process Councilmembers are asked to reveal ex-parte contact and on occasion a Councilmember recused themselves. Councilmember Mesaros recalled visiting City Hall and upon seeing Mr. Lien, asking him about a project and if there were any problems. Mr. Lien responded they should not talk about it because if there were problems and they were appealed, Councilmember Mesaros could be required to make a decision in a quasi- judicial hearing. That was insightful on Mr. Lien’s part. As Councilmember Tibbott said, a Councilmember may be talking to citizens about a project in its infancy and unknowingly be tainted by that discussion later in the process. As Mr. Taraday said, Councilmembers pride themselves on their accessibility to citizens; however, citizens may offer input early in the process before an appeal, resulting in a Councilmember being involved in ex-parte contact before the appeal process even begins. Mr. Lien said in reviewing the three meetings in 2016 agendas, none of them were public hearings. This item is on the extended agenda for September 18; the Council could have further discussion prior to a public hearing or schedule a public hearing. Mayor Pro Tem Nelson offered to work with Mr. Lien to select a date for the public hearing. Councilmembers were agreeable to that approach. 2. INTRODUCTION TO UPDATING CRITICAL AREA REGULATIONS FOR WETLANDS Environmental Program Manager Kernen Lien said this is the third time this topic has been presented to the Council. He reviewed:  Background o Completed comprehensive CAO update in May 2016 o June 2016 Department of Ecology Issues updated Wetland Guidance in Publication No. 16-06- 001 o Updated Wetland Guidance Incorporated into Shoreline Management Program o Shoreline Management Act vs. Growth Management Act  Shoreline Master Program applies in shoreline jurisdiction  CAO applies outside of shoreline jurisdiction o SMP Periodic Review  This updated focuses on SMP Excepted Sections o ECDC 23.50.010.B, Wetland Ratings. o ECDC 23.50.040.F.1, Standard Buffer Widths. o ECDC 23.50.040.F.2, Required Measures to Minimize Impacts to Wetlands. o ECDC 23.50.040.K, Small, Hydrologically Isolated Wetlands  History repeats itself (almost) o Public Hearing before Planning Board on July 11, 2018 o Ecology issues new wetland guidance on July 12, 2018  “If you are a local planner in the process of updating your CAO, we recommend that you use these modified wetland buffer tables in your update.”  Ecology 2018 Wetland Guidance o “We made the changes based on public feedback and our own review of the reference wetland data used to calibrate the Washington State Wetland Rating System. We knew we needed to make modifications in the grouping of habitat scores.” o Wetland Buffer Requirement Tables 2016 Table XX.1 Wetland Buffer Requirements for Western Washington 4.4.e Packet Pg. 197 Attachment: Exhibit 5: Septebmer 4, 2018 City Council Minutes Excerpt (Critical Area Regulations for Wetlands) Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes September 4, 2018 Page 10 If Table XX.2 is Implemented and Corridor Provided Buffer Width (in feet) based on habitat score Wetland Category 3-4 5 6-7 8-9 Category 1: Based on total score 75 105 165 225 2018 Table XX.1 Wetland Buffer Requirements for Western Washington If Table XX.2 is Implemented and Corridor Provided Buffer Width (in feet) based on habitat score Wetland Category 3-5 6-7 8-9 Category 1: Based on total score 75 110 225 Councilmember Johnson asked the wetland category for the Edmonds Marsh. Mr. Lien said the Edmonds Marsh is a Category II estuarian wetland. The buffers do not change from 2016 to the 2018 Guidance. The buffers for estuarian wetland is not based on the wetland habitat score. Mr. Lien continued his presentation:  Other minor amendments o ECDC 23.50.020.E – Wetland activities  Related to expansion of a structure that does not increase “footprint of development”  New section ECDC 23.50.040.J – Development Proposals with the Footprint of Existing Development o ECDC 23.50.040.G.3.d – buffer averaging scrivener’s error  Public hearing scheduled for September 25 Council President Pro Tem Buckshnis said although this is a minor update, there are a lot of code changes. She complimented Mr. Lien on very good packet. Councilmember Teitzel referred to ECDC 23.50.020.E related to expansion of a structure that does not increase the footprint of the development. He asked if footprint of the development applied to the structure or the structure and the paved area. Mr. Lien answered it does not apply to just the structure which is why he suggested deleting that section. When the CAO was updated in 2016, a definition of footprint of development was added which includes legally established impervious surface. The new section still allows development within the developed footprint but requires enhancement as well. That was discussed in 2016 and should have been deleted at that time. 3. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP) - CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN (CFP) DISCUSSION City Engineer Rob English provided a diagram showing components found only in the CIP and only in the CFP and components found in both the CIP and CFP. The CIP contains 6-year maintenance projects with funding sources, the CFP contains long range (20-year) capital project needs, and both contain 6-year capital projects with funding sources. He explained several sources are used to select projects for both the CIP and CFP, the first, the Comprehensive Plan which contains nine elements, four of which are used in developing the CIP and CFP (Utilities Plan, Transportation, Plan, Parks & Recreation Open Space Plan and Capital Facilities Plan). He reviewed:  Comprehensive Plan elements o Establish goals and policies o Assessment of future needs based on land use and modeling o Identifies infrastructure and services to support future needs o Public participation 4.4.e Packet Pg. 198 Attachment: Exhibit 5: Septebmer 4, 2018 City Council Minutes Excerpt (Critical Area Regulations for Wetlands) Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes September 25, 2018 Page 6 approved a moratorium on August 21 on the development of new housing units that do not have on-site vehicle parking. That ordinance also set a public hearing date for September 25th so the Council can determine whether to continue the moratorium. If the Council chooses not to take action to continue the moratorium, the moratorium automatically expires. The packet includes a resolution with findings that would continue the moratorium for six months. Staff will work on updating the code with regard to that specific issue which requires a significant public process. In February, Council could take action to extend the moratorium or the Council could end the moratorium sooner if the code is updated sooner than six months. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas commented when there were already such difficulties with parking, it was a tragedy that this had occurred. She encouraged the Council to support the moratorium to allow staff time to recommend amendments to require on-site parking. Mayor Earling opened the public participation portion of the public hearing. Michelle Dodge, Edmonds, explained after seeing this in the news, she conducted some research including speaking to neighbors. She learned when this was reviewed by the Planning Board three years ago, the neighbors expressed concern about the lack of parking including one neighbor who submitted a letter to the Planning Board. She was concerned that apparently the Planning Board was not talking to the Council. In April 2018, My Edmonds News referenced an April 24th presentation to the Council regarding new developments which touted these Beach Walk apartments as well as the Westgate Apartments although the lack of parking was not mentioned at that time. Hearing no further comment, Mayor Earling closed the public participation portion of the public hearing. Councilmember Buckshnis recalled the presentation Ms. Dodge referenced, noting at that level, the Council does not inquire about parking nor is there a large enough schematic provided to illustrate parking. She did not recall the Planning Board reviewing that project. Ms. Hope answered it would not have come to the Planning Board because it was allowed outright under code. Environmental Programs Manager Kernen Lien advised it went to the Architectural Design Board (ADB). Ms. Hope explained the ADB reviews the design, but they cannot make a decision on the parking requirements. She was not aware there was no parking required for that building until one of the residents expressed concern. When this issue first arose and it was determined the code allowed it outright, she was asked how that was included in the code. In checking with staff, the only thing they could remember was maybe the Council wanted small buildings to be allowed without requiring parking. However, there are no records regarding the intent. Councilmember Buckshnis asked if the moratorium is for all BD zones. Ms. Hope answered it is all the BD zones but only affects residential development in the BD zones. It does not affect other zones, but that is not allowed in any other zones. COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY-MONILLAS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 1418, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT TO SUPPORT THE ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE 4124 WHICH ESTABLISHED A MORATORIUM ON CERTAIN TYPES OF RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IN THE BD ZONES. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 3. PUBLIC HEARING ON CRITICAL AREA REGULATIONS FOR WETLANDS Environmental Programs Manager Kernen Lien reviewed:  Background o Completed comprehensive CAO update in May 2016 4.4.f Packet Pg. 199 Attachment: Exhibit 6: September 25, 2018 City Council Minutes Excerpt (Critical Area Regulations for Wetlands) Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes September 25, 2018 Page 7 o June 2016 Department of Ecology Issues updated Wetland Guidance in Publication No. 16-06- 001 o Updated Wetland Guidance Incorporated into Shoreline Management Program o Shoreline Management Act vs. Growth Management Act  Shoreline Master Program applies in shoreline jurisdiction  CAO applies outside of shoreline jurisdiction o SMP Periodic Review  SMP Excepted Sections o ECDC 23.50.010.B, Wetland Ratings. o ECDC 23.50.040.F.1, Standard Buffer Widths. o ECDC 23.50.040.F.2, Required Measures to Minimize Impacts to Wetlands. o ECDC 23.50.040.K, Small, Hydrologically Isolated Wetlands  History repeats itself (almost) o Public Hearing before Planning Board on July 11, 2018 o Ecology issues new wetland guidance on July 12, 2018  “If you are a local planner in the process of updating your CAO, we recommend that you use these modified wetland buffer tables in your update.”  Ecology 2018 Wetland Guidance o “We made the changes based on public feedback and our own review of the reference wetland data used to calibrate the Washington State Wetland Rating System. We knew we needed to make modifications in the grouping of habitat scores.” o Wetland Buffer Requirement Tables 2016 Table XX.1 Wetland Buffer Requirements for Western Washington If Table XX.2 is Implemented and Corridor Provided Buffer Width (in feet) based on habitat score Wetland Category 3-4 5 6-7 8-9 Category 1: Based on total score 75 105 165 225 2018 Table XX.1 Wetland Buffer Requirements for Western Washington If Table XX.2 is Implemented and Corridor Provided Buffer Width (in feet) based on habitat score Wetland Category 3-5 6-7 8-9 Category 1: Based on total score 75 110 225  Other minor amendments o ECDC 23.50.020.E – Wetland activities  Related to expansion of a structure that does not increase “footprint of development”  New section ECDC 23.50.040.J – Development Proposals within the Footprint of Existing Development o ECDC 23.50.040.G.3.d – buffer averaging scrivener’s error  Staff recommendation o Direct staff to prepare ordinance for further consent agenda Councilmember Tibbott inquired about the redlined Section E on page 279 of the packet. Mr. Lien explained expansion of a structure that does not increase footprint of development is an allowed activity in 23.50.020.E so a critical area report is not required; ECDC 23.50.40.J still allows it, but requires enhancement at a ratio of 1:1. Due to the conflict, 23.50.020.E should have been deleted in the earlier update. Councilmember Tibbott provided an example, on 1,000 square foot parking lot, a 100 square foot shed would be allowed activity because they were not changing the footprint. Mr. Lien answered in 23.50.020.E it would be an allowed activity; under 23.50.40.J it is still allowed but 100 square feet of 4.4.f Packet Pg. 200 Attachment: Exhibit 6: September 25, 2018 City Council Minutes Excerpt (Critical Area Regulations for Wetlands) Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes September 25, 2018 Page 8 mitigation or enhancement to the critical area would be required. Councilmember Tibbott asked what that mitigation would look like. Mr. Lien answered it was likely to be buffer enhancement. Many streams and wetlands in the City have lawn or development up to the edge of the critical area; the intent is to enhance the buffer through additional plantings to provide a more functional buffer. Councilmember Buckshnis asked about the wetland category for the Edmonds Marsh. Mr. Lien answered the marsh is a Category I estuarian wetland. The 2016 and the 2018 guidance did not change because the buffer on estuarian wetlands are not based on habitat score. Estuarian wetland was not called out in the current CAO; there is Category I-IV based on habitat and only Category I Estuarian wetland. The Category II Estuarian Wetland is included in the SMP with a 115-foot buffer. Councilmember Buckshnis inquired about setback. Mr. Lien advised setback is addressed in a different section of the code and that is not proposed to be changed. Mayor Earling opened the public participation portion of the public hearing. Roger Hertrich, Edmonds, commented on polluted water that enters the marsh, noting he had never seen additional controls on waterways or drainage that enters the marsh from uphill. He questioned whether a study had ever been done regarding what exists uphill that might pollute the marsh. He recalled last week’s discussion regarding the Waterfront Connector and past plans to move the ferry to Pt. Edward. He questioned how the marsh buffers would affect construction at Pt. Edwards. Hearing no further public comment, Mayor Earling closed the public participation portion of the public hearing. COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL, TO DIRECT STAFF TO PREPARE AN ORDINANCE CONSISTENT WITH THE UPDATES PROPOSED IN EXHIBIT 4 FOR A FUTURE CONSENT AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 4. PUBLIC HEARING ON MORATORIUM EXTENSION ON CRUMB RUBBER ATHLETIC FIELDS Council President Nelson recalled The City Council originally adopted the crumb rubber moratorium with Ordinance 4013 on December 8, 2015. That moratorium has been extended several times, most recently via Ordinance 4125 on August 21, 2018 to extend the prohibition of certain installations of SBR (styrene- butadiene rubber) on public lands in the City of Edmonds for six months. The moratorium extension requires a public hearing within 60 days. Mayor Earling opened the public participation portion of the public hearing. David Morton, Redmond, expressed support for Edmonds’ moratorium extension on crumb rubber athletic fields. More definitive information on crumb rubber’s effects on people is still needed and he applauded the Council for continuing its precautionary ban on the use of crumb rubber. Some people who support the use of crumb rubber have chosen to accept the results of a January 2017 report of the Washington State Department of Health (DOH). The authors of the report admit “assurances of the safety of artificial turf are limited by lack of adequate information.” In the study the DOH set out to determine whether the number of cancer diagnoses among soccer players reported to DOH was higher than would be expected of a random sample. However, the study was poorly designed to accomplish this goal and the conclusions in the report are not supported by the studies’ own data. The report uses an informal, incomplete list of cancer cases compiled by Amy Griffin, a University of Washington soccer coach; this list cannot be assumed to represent all cases of cancer among soccer players in Washington. The report presents an invalid and misleading calculation of an observed to expected ratio. No systematic effort was made to identify all 4.4.f Packet Pg. 201 Attachment: Exhibit 6: September 25, 2018 City Council Minutes Excerpt (Critical Area Regulations for Wetlands) City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 10/16/2018 Street Dedication at 7922 180th Ave W Staff Lead: Phil Williams Department: Engineering Preparer: Megan Luttrell Background/History On October 9, 2018, staff presented this item to the Parks & Public Works Committee and it was forwarded to the October 16th consent agenda for approval. Staff Recommendation Approve the street dedication. Narrative The property owner at 7922 180th St. SW is dedicating a portion of his property to enable the City to install a bench in memory of his late wife (along 80th Ave W). The City is also looking to install a sidewalk along 80th Ave W and 180th St. SW from 188th St. SW to Olympic View Dr. and complete corner improvements at 80th Ave W at 180th St. SW (once funding is secured). This project is identified in the long walkway list of the 2015 Walkway Plan (total cost ~ $1.35M). This dedication would enable all these items to be completed without any future right-of-way takes from this property. The total dedication amounts to 1,235 Square Feet. Since the lot size will still be greater than 12,000 SF with this dedication, this property will remain large enough for a Single Family Residence (based on RS- 12 requirements in Edmonds City Code 16.20.030). Attachments: Deed for Dedication Vicinity Map 4.5 Packet Pg. 202 Page 1 of 5 2018-09-12 Deed of Dedication Return Address: Scott Passey City Clerk City of Edmonds 121 5th Avenue N Edmonds, WA 98020 (425) 775-2525 Document Title(s): Deed of Dedication for Right-of-Way Assessor's Property Tax Parcel/Account Number: 00370800100202 Reference Number(s) of Documents assigned or released if applicable: Additional reference numbers are on page of document. N/A Grantor(s) (Last name first, then first name and initials): 1. Fiene, Frederick D. 2. 3. Grantee(s) (Last name first, then first name and initials): 1. City of Edmonds, a Washington Municipal Corporation 2. 3. Legal Description (abbreviated: i.e., lot, block, plat or section, township, range): Additional legal is on page 5 of document. A PORTION OF ADMIRALTY ACRES BLK 001 D-02 - N 119.00 FT OF LOT 2 EXC E 97 FT THOF The Auditor/Recorder will rely on the information provided on the form. The staff will not read the document to verify the accuracy or completeness of the indexing information provided herein. 4.5.a Packet Pg. 203 Attachment: Deed for Dedication (Street Dedication at 7922 180th Ave W) Page 2 of 5 2018-09-12 Deed of Dedication DEED OF DEDICATION FOR RIGHT-OF-WAY The GRANTOR, Frederick D. Fiene , a single person, for Ten Dollars and other valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, dedicate and convey to the City of Edmonds a right-of-way for the use of the public forever over, under, and across the following described real estate, situate in the city of Edmonds, county of Snohomish, state of Washington: See Exhibit A for legal description and Exhibit B for graphical depiction, both attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof Together with the right to make all necessary slopes for cuts and fills upon the abutting property on each side of any right-of-way improvements that are now, or may be in the future, constructed on said property, in conformity with standard plans and specifications for right- of-way purposes, and to the same extent and purposes as if the rights herein granted had been dedicated in conjunction with the recording of a final plat under the subdivision statutes of the State of Washington. Grantors also hereby waive, on behalf of themselves, their successors, heirs, and assigns, all claims for damages against the city of Edmonds which may be occasioned to the adjacent land by the established construction, drainage and maintenance of said right-of-way. Dated this ______ day of ______________________, 20 . GRANTOR Signature THIS DEDICATION is accepted by the City of Edmonds pursuant to Resolution No. ___, adopted by the Edmonds City Council on the ____ day of ___________, 20__. 4.5.a Packet Pg. 204 Attachment: Deed for Dedication (Street Dedication at 7922 180th Ave W) Page 3 of 5 2018-09-12 Deed of Dedication STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss. COUNTY OF ____________ ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that he signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Printed Name Residing at: Appointment Expires: STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss. COUNTY OF ____________ ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that she signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be her free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Printed Name Residing at: Appointment Expires: 4.5.a Packet Pg. 205 Attachment: Deed for Dedication (Street Dedication at 7922 180th Ave W) Page 4 of 5 2018-09-12 Deed of Dedication Exhibit A - legal description A portion of Lot 2, Block 1 of the Plat of Admiralty Acres, according to the Plat recorded in Volume 12 of Plats, page 48, in Snohomish County, Washington, more particularly described as follows: The west five feet of the north 119 feet of that Lot 2, together with: Commencing at the northwest corner of the same Lot 2, Thence easterly along the northern line of the same Lot 2, a distance of 5 feet to the True Point of Beginning, Thence easterly along the same northern line an additional 32 feet; Thence southwesterly to a point 40 feet south of the northern line of Block 1, also being 5 feet easterly of the western line of Lot 2; Thence northerly a distance of 40 feet, closing at the True Point of Beginning. 4.5.a Packet Pg. 206 Attachment: Deed for Dedication (Street Dedication at 7922 180th Ave W) 4.5.a Packet Pg. 207 Attachment: Deed for Dedication (Street Dedication at 7922 180th Ave W) N7922 180th St. SWSouthwest County Park4.5.bPacket Pg. 208Attachment: Vicinity Map (Street Dedication at 7922 180th Ave W) City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 10/16/2018 Street Dedication at 18807 88th Ave W. Staff Lead: Rob English Department: Engineering Preparer: Megan Luttrell Background/History On October 9, 2018, staff presented this item to the Parks & Public Works Committee and it was forwarded to the October 16th consent agenda for approval. Staff Recommendation Approve the street dedication. Narrative The City of Edmonds is currently reviewing a proposed development project, Select Homes 3 lot Short Plat located at 18807 88th Ave W. The Official City of Edmonds Street Map indicates that 10 ft shall be dedicated to the City for right of way adjacent to the west property line on 88th Ave W. The total square footage to be dedicated is equal to 1240.30 sf. Attachments: Vicinity Map Dedication Detail Site Plan with Dedication 4.6 Packet Pg. 209 © City of Edmonds THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION WGS_1984_Web_Mercator_Auxiliary_Sphere Feet Notes Legend This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is for reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accurate, current, or otherwise reliable. 752.330 1:18,056 18807 88th Ave W 1,504.7 4.6.a Packet Pg. 210 Attachment: Vicinity Map (Street Dedication at 18807 88th Ave SW) 4.6.bPacket Pg. 211Attachment: Dedication Detail (Street Dedication at 18807 88th Ave SW) 4.6.c Packet Pg. 212 Attachment: Site Plan with Dedication (Street Dedication at 18807 88th Ave SW) City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 10/16/2018 Pedestrian Easement at 8609 244th St.SW Staff Lead: Rob English Department: Engineering Preparer: Megan Luttrell Background/History On October 9, 2018, staff presented this item to the Parks & Public Works Committee and it was forwarded to the October 16th consent agenda for approval. Staff Recommendation Approve the pedestrian easement. Narrative The City of Edmonds is currently reviewing a proposed development project, Meitzner Multi-Family, which includes construction of three multi-family buildings to be platted into 11 unit lots at 8609 244th St SW. Edmonds Community Development Code requires a minimum width of 5 ft for sidewalks. To meet this requirement, a portion of the sidewalk must be widened onto private property to provide a 5 ft. clearance behind the mailbox installation. For this reason, a public pedestiran easement will be provided to the City. Attachments: Vicinity Map Site Plan with Easement Easement Detail 4.7 Packet Pg. 213 4.7.a Packet Pg. 214 Attachment: Vicinity Map (Pedestrian Easement at 8609 244th St.SW) 4.7.b Packet Pg. 215 Attachment: Site Plan with Easement (Pedestrian Easement at 8609 244th St.SW) 4.7.c Packet Pg. 216 Attachment: Easement Detail (Pedestrian Easement at 8609 244th St.SW) City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 10/16/2018 WWTP Job Descriptions Staff Lead: Phil Williams Department: Public Works & Utilities Preparer: Phil Williams Background/History These new position descriptions were included in the 2018 Teamsters Contract negotiations presented to City Council on September 18, 2018. On October 9th, 2018 the City Council Public Safety, Personnel, & Planning Committee approved these job descriptions and recommended they be forwarded to the consent agenda for October 16th, 2018. Staff Recommendation Staff recommend the approval of job descriptions for Sr. Instrument Technician/Plant Electrician and Sr. Wastewater Treatment Plant Laboratory Technician in accordance with the Teamster's collective bargaining agreement. These two new job descriptions were part of the negotiations and newly approved contract for 2018- 2020 with Teamsters Local 763. The new job descriptions were discussed in executive session with Council in December 2017 and September 2018. This agenda item requests that Council formally approve the job descriptions for which the positions were authorized in the new Teamsters contract. Typically, WWTP job descriptions have been written for entry level and/or generalist applicants in order to increase the pool of candidates able to apply. Once hired, some of these individuals begin to acquire very specific knowledge, education and experience relevant to the industry and valuable to the City. In order to attract and preserve these competent and motivated staff, it is vital to be able to provide on- going challenges and competitive compensation. These new job descriptions (Senior WWTP Instrument Technician/Plant Electrician), as approved by the union, require the advanced education and certification cited above in addition to long-term demonstrated competence and a willingness to accept increased responsibility at this level. New applicants would hire into the entry level positions (WWTP Instrument Technician/Plant Electrician or WWTP Laboratory Technician), commensurate with their education and experience. Once further advanced education and certification, demonstrated competence and willingness to accept increased responsibility are documented, the employee may be able to be placed into the higher classification. These new positions do not increase the current FTE count for the WWTP. The newly proposed job descriptions provide added value to the organization, help to ensure retention of in-house experts and to continue to develop our processes and programs. Furthermore, the new positions provide critical backup for emergency responses and Department of Ecology requirements. 4.8 Packet Pg. 217 The new job descriptions are attached. Attachments: Senior WWTP Instrument Technician.Plant Electrician 9.18 Senior WWTP Laboratory Technician - 9.18 4.8 Packet Pg. 218 Sr. WWTP Instrument Technician/Plant Electrician September 2018 City of EDMONDS Washington SR. INSTRUMENT TECHNICIAN/PLANT ELECTRICIAN Department: Public Works – Wastewater Treatment Pay Grade: M Bargaining Unit: Teamsters FLSA Status: Non-Exempt Revised Date: September 2018 Reports To: WWTP Manager POSITION PURPOSE: The Sr. Instrument Technician/Plant Electrician is differentiated from the Instrument Technician/Plant Electrician by advanced level industry specific system knowledge and application, demonstrated control systems expertise, ability to manage capital projects and support of the plants energy management program. Under general supervision, performs journey-level technical support work related to the Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) instrumentation, controls, and telemetry and power distribution systems and maintains and repairs Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) system. Work assignments are received via work orders, email or written log and require the incumbent to understand, investigate and determine the appropriate procedures to follow to complete the work. Works independently with little or no direct supervision or may lead a small cross functional team in the completion of assigned work. Evaluates and troubleshoots equipment and systems to determine appropriate repairs. Works closely with leadership team to assure compliance with all Federal, State and local laws, set priorities and manage I&C/E elements of larger projects. Work is reviewed in progress and upon completion for compliance with instructions and work standards. ESSENTIAL FUNCTIONS AND RESPONSIBILITIES: The following duties ARE NOT intended to serve as a comprehensive list of all duties performed by all employees in this classification, only a representative summary of the primary duties and responsibilities. Incumbent(s) may not be required to perform all duties listed and may be required to perform additional, position-specific duties.  Performs a variety of Journey level work related to WWTP Instrumentation including: process control instrumentation, programmable logic controllers (PLC), tone telemetry systems and instrumentation calibration control system software.  Performs a variety of journey level work related to the WWTP electrical systems including: power distribution system, motor controls, basic wiring and electrical circuits.  Determines priorities and troubleshoots emergency situations related to equipment failure or process downtime.  Performs routine maintenance, repair and calibration on a variety of instrumentation and control equipment, including: transducers, timers, switches, sensors, transmitters, monitors, level indicators, detectors, pressure sensors, flow meters, signal conditioners, enunciators, controllers, motor starters and relays.  Maintains and repairs the Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) system and performs scheduled routine calibrations to ensure proper maintenance and accuracy of equipment operation.  Assists in the development and implementation of preventive maintenance programs related to the WWTP’s instrumentation and control equipment, including: preventive maintenance schedules, record keeping, and inventory and equipment repairs.  Prepares and maintains a variety of records and reports, maintain technical manuals and drawing and schematics for plant equipment. 4.8.a Packet Pg. 219 Attachment: Senior WWTP Instrument Technician.Plant Electrician 9.18 (WWTP Job Descriptions) JOB DESCRIPTION Senior WWTP Instrument Technician/Plant Electrician Sr. WWTP Instrument Technician/Plant Electrician September 2018  Operates and maintains a variety of specialized tools and equipment, including: computer diagnostic equipment, oscilloscope, signal simulator, calibrators, solder equipment and others. Determines most cost effective manner to ensure equipment is calibrated and maintained properly.  Coordinates daily work activities with Operations and Maintenance based on established priorities, verifies work is completed to standards with effective resource utilization.  Energy Management Champion; responsible for helping to manage electrical usage and distribution.  Assists IT in the maintenance of plant PC’s and plant servers.  Performs basic programming of PLC’s, ensuring documentation is properly updated and make minor modifications to Control Strategies within SCADA while ensuring that the plants programming standards are met and that appropriate personnel are trained on the modifications.  Troubleshoots generator malfunctions and Automatic Transfer Switches for energy management. Required Knowledge of:  Instrumentation of electrical systems related to industrial applications.  Electrical theory, principles and practices of AC/DC power, electrostatic discharge and control circuits and motor control circuits.  Instrumentation theory and process controls fundamentals, ladder logic diagrams, tone telemetry equipment and PLC logic.  Methods and procedures of operating electronic computers and peripheral equipment.  Methods and practices of preventive maintenance, troubleshooting and equipment malfunction diagnosis.  Health and safety regulations and procedures, including safe work practices with high voltage equipment.  Proper methods of storing equipment, materials and supplies.  Technical aspects of the building maintenance trades.  Effective oral and written communication principles and practices.  Modern office equipment including computers and computer applications to include such programs as Microsoft Office Suite or others in order to sufficiently to perform work assignments.  English usage, spelling, grammar and punctuation. Required Skill in:  Performing a variety of technical support work related to the WWTP instrumentation and electrical systems.  Inspecting, adjusting, repairing and replacing mechanical and electrical units and related parts.  Reading and understanding complex electronic schematics and technical manuals.  Maintaining, repairing and calibrating plant instrumentation, controls and telemetry; maintaining and repairing the SCADA system.  Troubleshooting, adjusting and servicing specialized equipment used in the WWTP.  Calibrating process instruments and PID loops.  Operating computers and peripheral equipment properly and efficiently.  Learning department goals and objectives.  Reading, interpreting, applying and explaining rules, regulations, policies and procedures.  Maintaining current knowledge of technological advances in the field.  Observing health and safety regulations and safe driving practices.  Following oral and written instructions.  Working various shifts and being available to be on call for 24 hour emergency response. 4.8.a Packet Pg. 220 Attachment: Senior WWTP Instrument Technician.Plant Electrician 9.18 (WWTP Job Descriptions) JOB DESCRIPTION Senior WWTP Instrument Technician/Plant Electrician Sr. WWTP Instrument Technician/Plant Electrician September 2018 MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS: Education and Experience: Required: Any combination equivalent to: two years of vocational training in design of control loops, industrial instrumentation, electronic controls, AC/DC Power, electrical circuits and electrical systems to include wiring of 480 volt equipment and interpretation of electrical wiring diagrams and two years’ experience troubleshooting electrical systems and documenting modifications. Preferred: Five years’ experience with instrumentation and Controls in a secondary wastewater facility and responsible for the daily O&M of the plants SCADA, PLC’s, Laboratory and Historical Data Management. Experience in developing procedures and training others to ensure safety in and around 480 volt, 3 phase equipment. Four years’ experience troubleshooting and testing Automatic Transfer Switches designed for power management. Required Licenses or Certifications: ControlLogic Maintainer Certification Valid State of Washington Driver’s License. CPR, First Aid, AED, and Bloodborne Pathogen Cards within 6 months of hire date. Must be able to successfully complete and pass a background check. Mandatory drug test subject to conditional job offer. WORKING CONDITIONS: Environment:  Indoor/outdoor work environment.  Driving a vehicle to conduct work.  Working in a confined or classified space. Physical Abilities:  Hearing, speaking or otherwise communicating to exchange information in person or on the phone.  Operating a variety of grounds equipment and power and hand tools.  Operating a computer keyboard or other office equipment.  Reading a variety of materials and instruments and possess close vision, far vision, side vision, depth perception, night vision and color vision.  Ascending/descending ladders.  Lifting/ carrying or otherwise moving or transporting heavy objects frequently up to 50lbs.  Sitting/standing or otherwise remaining in a stationary position for extended periods of time.  Walking or otherwise moving over rough or uneven surfaces while performing inspections and investigations.  Performing repetitive motions, including: balancing, stooping, kneeling, bending, crouching, crawling, reaching overhead, above the shoulders and horizontally and standing, pushing, pulling and using stairs.  Working in tight spaces.  Ability to wear appropriate personal protective equipment based on required City Policy. Hazards: 4.8.a Packet Pg. 221 Attachment: Senior WWTP Instrument Technician.Plant Electrician 9.18 (WWTP Job Descriptions) JOB DESCRIPTION Senior WWTP Instrument Technician/Plant Electrician Sr. WWTP Instrument Technician/Plant Electrician September 2018  Exposure to chemicals, used in Wastewater treatment such as: Sodium Hypochlorite, Caustic Soda, Bisulfate, Polymers, Clay, Lime and Carbon.  Exposure to raw and treated sewage, odors associated with sewage treatment, high heat and moving equipment.  Exposure to cleaning chemicals, herbicides and dust.  Working at heights using ladders and structures.  Working around and with sometimes noisy machinery having moving parts.  Exposure to slippery surfaces and damp spaces while cleaning in and around equipment.  Exposure to electrical power supply and high voltage. Incumbent Signature: ____________________________________ Date: ________________________ Department Head: _______________________________________ Date: ________________________ 4.8.a Packet Pg. 222 Attachment: Senior WWTP Instrument Technician.Plant Electrician 9.18 (WWTP Job Descriptions) Senior WWTP Laboratory Technician September 2018 City of EDMONDS Washington SENIOR WWTP LABORATORY TECHNICIAN Department: Public Works – Wastewater Treatment Pay Grade: M Bargaining Unit: Teamsters FLSA Status: Non Exempt Revised Date: September 2018 Reports To: WWTP Supervisor POSITION PURPOSE: The Sr. WWTP Laboratory Technician is differentiated from the WWTP Laboratory Technician by the requirement for industry specific system knowledge and application, advanced demonstrated process control expertise, ability to manage research projects, ability to write technical documents and assist the Plant Manager with preparation of regulatory reports. Under general supervision, performs chemical and microbiological tests to ensure that the parameters for the plant discharge permit are met; maintains the quality assurance program to meet the Department of Ecology and Environmental Protection Agency requirements; maintains accurate records on all tests performed; ensures final effluent is sent out to private laboratories to test for priority pollutants, heavy metals, and other toxic organics to meet permit requirements; runs regular and periodic proficiency tests on permit parameters to show that lab procedures are producing acceptable results and advises supervisors of large changes in the process so corrective action can be taken. ESSENTIAL FUNCTIONS AND RESPONSIBILITIES: The following duties ARE NOT intended to serve as a comprehensive list of all duties performed by all employees in this classification, only a representative summary of the primary duties and responsibilities. Incumbent(s) may not be required to perform all duties listed and may be required to perform additional, position-specific duties.  Performs a variety of technical work related to chemical, physical and biological laboratory analysis of process samples in wastewater, and ensures compliance with standard testing methods, procedures and regulations.  Utilizes manual and automatic samplers to collect samples; utilizes a variety of field equipment probes, such as: pH and temperature meters, dissolved oxygen probe and core sampler. Calibrates field meters as needed such as TSS and DO meters.  Ensures proper handling, storage and transport of samples to maintain integrity based on standard methods.  Conducts laboratory analysis such as: pH, suspended solids, volatile and total solids, BOD, COD, ammonia, nitrate, chlorides, chlorine residual, fecal coliform and alkalinity.  Operates a computer terminal to prepare a variety of reports and records related to lab test results according to established EPA and Department of Ecology requirements; calculates and compiles data and test records.  Maintains State accreditation of laboratory by ensuring staff is properly trained; applies appropriate analytical methods and assures equipment is maintained and operating properly in order for the lab to meet Quality Assurance/Quality Control guidelines and parameters.  Interprets lab data and determines appropriate process control parameters and works with operators to ensure daily compliance with the parameters. 4.8.b Packet Pg. 223 Attachment: Senior WWTP Laboratory Technician - 9.18 (WWTP Job Descriptions) JOB DESCRIPTION Senior WWTP Laboratory Technician Senior WWTP Laboratory Technician September 2018  Prepares periodic and special reports related to quality control and results of laboratory tests according to compliance and certification requirement including: discharge monitoring quality control and assurance reports, laboratory analysis worksheets, equipment maintenance and calibration records and others; submits reports to appropriate agencies or department(s) as required.  Interprets lab data and determines appropriate laboratory corrective action; notifies operators in cases of potential permit violations as appropriate.  Prepares and standardizes chemical reagents and establishes chemical adjustments for the process equipment.  Maintains current knowledge of technical advances in the field; reads and remains current on new method development procedures and validation including additional testing and other procedures as required by regulatory agencies.  Operates and maintains a variety of test equipment such as: pH probe, incubators, autoclave, microscope, DO probes, balances and Chlorine test kits. Required Knowledge of:  Principles of microbiology, physics and statistics.  Principles of activated sludge and wastewater treatment.  NPDES, Department of Ecology and EPA accreditation and permit regulations, policies and procedures.  Appropriate quality assurance and quality control laboratory analysis.  Current laboratory procedures, techniques and related equipment operation, including analytical instruments utilized in water and wastewater analysis.  Proper laboratory health and safety practices.  General operations of a secondary treatment plant.  Technical record keeping and report preparation techniques and practices.  Modern office procedures, methods, and equipment including computers and computer applications sufficient to perform work assignments.  Hazardous chemical handling and disposal requirements related to MSDS. Required Skill in:  Performing a variety of technical work related to chemical, physical and biological laboratory analysis of process samples in wastewater.  Preparing periodic and special reports related to quality control and results of laboratory tests according to compliance and certification requirements.  Operating a computer terminal to enter data, maintain records and generate reports.  Learning department and program objectives and goals.  Maintaining current knowledge of technological advances in the field.  Observing health and safety regulations and procedures.  Observing changes in colors during titration. MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS: Education and Experience: High School Diploma/GED Certificate supplemented by college level coursework in chemistry, physics, or microbiology and four years of experience in water, wastewater, or process industry laboratory work that includes experience with collecting, testing, and recording a variety of test samples; OR an equivalent combination of education, training and experience. 4.8.b Packet Pg. 224 Attachment: Senior WWTP Laboratory Technician - 9.18 (WWTP Job Descriptions) JOB DESCRIPTION Senior WWTP Laboratory Technician Senior WWTP Laboratory Technician September 2018 Preferred Education and Experience: Bachelor’s Degree in Environmental Science, Chemistry or Microbiology. Required Licenses or Certifications: State of WA Group IV Certification Valid State of Washington Driver’s License. Valid CPR, First Aid, AED, and Bloodborne Pathogen Cards. Must be able to successfully complete and pass a background check. Mandatory drug test subject to conditional job offer. WORKING CONDITIONS: Environment:  Indoor/outdoor work environment.  Driving a vehicle to conduct work.  Working in a confined or classified space. Physical Abilities:  Hearing, speaking or otherwise communicating to exchange information in person or on the phone.  Operating a variety of grounds equipment and power and hand tools.  Operating a computer keyboard or other office equipment.  Reading a variety of materials and instruments and possess close vision, far vision, side vision, depth perception, night vision and color vision.  Ascending/descending ladders.  Lifting/ carrying or otherwise moving or transporting heavy objects frequently up to 50lbs.  Sitting/standing or otherwise remaining in a stationary position for extended periods of time  Walking or otherwise moving over rough or uneven surfaces while performing inspections and investigations.  Performing repetitive motions, including: balancing, stooping, kneeling, bending, crouching, crawling, reaching overhead, above the shoulders and horizontally, and standing, pushing, pulling and using stairs.  Working in tight spaces.  Ability to wear appropriate personal protective equipment based on required City Policy. Hazards:  Exposure to chemicals, used in Wastewater treatment such as: Sodium Hypochlorite, Caustic Soda, Bisulfate, Polymers, Clay, Lime and Carbon.  Exposure to raw and treated sewage, odors associated with sewage treatment, high heat and moving equipment.  Exposure to cleaning chemicals, herbicides and dust.  Working at heights using ladders and structures  Working around and with sometimes noisy machinery having moving parts  Exposure to slippery surfaces, damp spaces while cleaning in and around equipment.  Exposure to electrical power supply and high voltage. 4.8.b Packet Pg. 225 Attachment: Senior WWTP Laboratory Technician - 9.18 (WWTP Job Descriptions) JOB DESCRIPTION Senior WWTP Laboratory Technician Senior WWTP Laboratory Technician September 2018 Incumbent Signature: ____________________________________ Date: ________________________ Department Head: _______________________________________ Date: ________________________ 4.8.b Packet Pg. 226 Attachment: Senior WWTP Laboratory Technician - 9.18 (WWTP Job Descriptions) City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 10/16/2018 Excelsior Place Street Vacation - Resolution of Intent to Vacate Staff Lead: Kernen Lien Department: Planning Division Preparer: Kernen Lien Background/History Duane Landsverk and A.P. VanMeter have submitted a petition to vacate a portion of Excelsior Place that lies adjacent to and north of the property addressed at 19511 94th Place West. The City Council is required to consider street vacations in a public hearing set by resolution. The City Council passed Resolution No. 1417 setting the public hearing for September 25, 2018. Staff Recommendation Adopt the Resolution of Intent to Vacate provided in Exhibit 1. Narrative The portion of Excelsior Place that is adjacent to and north of the property addressed at 19511 94th Place West is the subject of this application. This section of right-of-way was created in 1906 with the Edmonds Sea View Tracts plat. The right-of-way is 20 feet wide and the portion of this vacation request is approximately 500 feet long. The City of Edmonds has sanitary sewer and water lines located within the right-of-way. Two-thirds of property owners abutting this section of Excelsior Place have signed the petition for street vacation. Pursuant to ECDC 20.70.070, the City Council is to consider the vacation request at a public hearing set by resolution. The City Council passed Resolution No. 1417 setting the public hearing for September 25, 2018. Additional information was provided by the applicant in advance of the public hearing on September 25, 2018. City staff requested a continuation of the hearing to October 2, 2018 so the additional information could be reviewed. Following the October 2, 2018 continued public hearing, the City Council directed staff to prepare a Resolution of Intent to Vacate with the conditions identified in the staff report. The conditions in the Resolution of Intent to Vacate provided in Exhibit 1 have been clarified at the suggestion of the City Attorney. The intent or substantive result of the conditions has not been modified. Attachments: Exhbit 1: Resolution of Intent to Vacate Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachments Exhibit 3: September 25, 2018 City Council Minutes Excerpt Exhibit 4: October 2, 2018 City Council Minutes Excerpt 4.9 Packet Pg. 227 1 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, STATING ITS INTENT TO VACATE A PORTION OF 92ND AVENUE WEST LYING SOUTH OF A PORTION OF EXCELSIOR PLACE ADJACENT TO THE PROPERTY ADDRESSED AT 19511 94TH PLACE WEST UPON THE FULFILLMENT OF CERTAIN CONTIONS. WHEREAS, on August 21, 2018, the Edmonds City Council adopted resolution No. 1371 establishing a public hearing on a proposed street vacation, File No. PLN20180021; and WHERES, a public hearing on the proposed street vacation was held on September 25, 2018 and continued to October 2, 2018; and WHEREAS, the subject right-of-way was originally acquired pursuant to dedication and not at public expense; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds and determines that the vacation is in the public interest, and that no property will be denied access as a result of the vacation; and WHEREAS, public utilities consisting of sewer and water lines are located within the proposed street vacation area; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds it necessary to retain an easement allowing the continuing use, repair and maintenance of the City’s water and sewer facilities; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The city council hereby states its intent to vacate by ordinance that portion of Excelsior Place that lies adjacent to and north of the property addressed at 19511 – 94th Place West as shown on the attached Exhibit A and further described in File 4.9.a Packet Pg. 228 Attachment: Exhbit 1: Resolution of Intent to Vacate (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - Resolution of Intent to Vacate) 2 No. PLN20180021, which are incorporated by this reference as fully as if herein set forth as long as the following conditions are met within ninety (90) days: 1. A street vacation ordinance shall be brought to city council for consideration and action, which shall retain for the City of Edmonds a public utility easement for the installation, construction, operation, maintenance, repair, reconstruction and/or replacement of the water and sewer systems and necessary appurtenances, over, across, through, and below the subject Excelsior Place right-of-way to be vacated. 2. The applicants shall convey and deliver to the City for future recording, a utility access and emergency vehicle turn-around shall be constructed to City standards in a location to be agreed upon by the property owners, the City Engineering Division, and South County Fire for the benefit of the City of Edmonds and South County Fire. 3. The applicants shall convey and deliver to the City for future recording, a private access easement for the benefit of all lots with frontage on the vacated portion of Excelsior Place. 4. The applicants shall convey and deliver to the City for future recording, an emergency access easement in a location to be agreed upon by the property owners, the City Engineering Division, and South County Fire for the benefit of South County Fire. Additionally, a covenant shall be executed and delivered to the City to be recorded against the properties that comprise the proposed lot line adjustment requiring the construction of an emergency access road within the easement consistent with South County Fire’s Fire Lane Standards. The covenant shall provide that construction of the emergency access road will be a condition of building permit approval in the event that an additional single family residence is proposed to be constructed and take primary or secondary access from any portion of the area to be vacated. Section 2. If the applicants fail to deliver the easements referenced in sub- paragraphs 1.2, 1.3 and 1.4, and the covenant referenced in sub-paragraph 1.4, above, 4.9.a Packet Pg. 229 Attachment: Exhbit 1: Resolution of Intent to Vacate (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - Resolution of Intent to Vacate) 3 within ninety (90) days of the date of adoption of this resolution, then this resolution shall become null and void. RESOLVED THIS 16th DAY OF OCTOBER, 2018: MAYOR DAVE EARLING ATTEST: CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: RESOLUTION NO. ___ 4.9.a Packet Pg. 230 Attachment: Exhbit 1: Resolution of Intent to Vacate (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - Resolution of Intent to Vacate) CITY OF EDMONDS 121 5th Avenue North, Edmonds WA 98020 Phone: 425.771.0220 • Fax: 425.771.0221 • Web: www.edmondswa.gov DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT • PLANNING DIVISION PLN20180021 Page 1 of 14 REPORT & RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL Project: Consideration of vacating a portion of Excelsior Place adjacent to the property addressed at 19511 – 94th Place West Requested Permits: PLN20180021 Date of Report: September 28, 2018 Staff Contacts: Jeanie McConnell, Engineering Program Manager Kernen Lien, Environmental Programs Manager Public Hearing: October 2, 2018 Council Chambers 250 - 5th Avenue North, Edmonds I. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL AND PROCESS An application and petition has been filed with the City of Edmonds to vacate that portion of Excelsior Place that lies adjacent to and north of the property addressed at 19511 – 94th Place West (Attachments 1 – 7). Two of the three property owners who abut the section of Excelsior Place proposed for vacation have signed the petition to vacate. The right-of-way is 20 feet wide and the portion of this vacation request is approximately 500 feet in length (Attachments 4 - 5). The City Council is required to consider street vacations in a public hearing set by resolution. The Council passed Resolution No. 1417 (Attachment 8) which set the public hearing for September 25, 2018. Additional information was provided by the applicant in advance of the public hearing on September 25th. City staff requested a continuation of the hearing to October 2nd, so the additional information could be reviewed (Attachment 28). Below is staff’s evaluation of the street vacation criteria as established in Chapter 20.70 Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC). 4.9.b Packet Pg. 231 Attachment: Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachments (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - PLN20180021 – Excelsior Place Street Vacation Page 2 of 14 II. GENERAL INFORMATION 1. Location: The subject street vacation is for that portion of Excelsior Place that lies adjacent to and north of the property addressed at 19511 – 94th Place West (Attachment 9). 2. Zoning: Public right-of-ways are unzoned. The properties surrounding Excelsior Place are all zoned RS-12 (Single-family Residential; 12,000 square feet minimum lot size). See Attachment 9 for zoning and vicinity map. The Comprehensive Plan designation for the immediately adjacent properties is “Single Family - Resource”. Given the surrounding Comprehensive Plan and zoning designations, if the City Council approves the proposed street vacation, the vacated right-of-way should be zoned RS-12 with a Comprehensive Plan designation of “Single Family - Resource.” This would be consistent with the existing zoning and Comprehensive Plan designations of the abutting land surrounding the subject right-of-way. 3. Size: The area of the proposed vacation is approximately 10,240 square feet. 4. Existing Use: The portion of Excelsior Place that is the subject of this vacation request primarily serves as the driveway to 19511 - 94th Place West. Public utilities are also located within the right-of-way, including water and sanitary sewer lines (Attachment 5). Overhead power lines run adjacent to the right-of-way just north of the Excelsior Place right-of-way. III. NOTICE Public Notice requirements for street vacations are detailed in ECDC 20.70.090. A notice for the council’s consideration of vacation was published in the Herald Newspaper on September 9, 2018. A notice was also posted at the subject site and mailed to property owners within 300 feet of the site. In accordance with ECDC 20.70.090, the public notice included description of easements that may be retained during the vacation process (Attachment 10). The City has complied with the noticing provisions of ECDC 20.70.090. At the September 25, 2018 public hearing, the City Council continued the public hearing to October 2, 2018. Pursuant to ECDC 20.70.120, since the Council announced the date of the next hearing no further notice of the hearing is required. IV. PUBLIC COMMENTS The City of Edmonds has received three sets of written comments on the proposed street vacation. 4.9.b Packet Pg. 232 Attachment: Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachments (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - PLN20180021 – Excelsior Place Street Vacation Page 3 of 14 Shirley and John Vicklund submitted comments (Attachment 24) concerned about safety issues with access to Puget Drive from 94th Place West and indicated the neighbors currently use Excelsior Place to head east. Staff Response: Regarding safety concerns at the 94th Place West and Puget Drive intersection, this is an existing condition that is not impacted by the street vacation. Attachments 18 – 19 provided by the applicant document issues with this intersection in 1984 and a City Determination that access into and out of 94th Place West is to be via right turns only. Traffic flow signage (Attachment xx) at 94th Place West and Puget Drive address the traffic safety concerns. Documentation provided by the applicants (Attachment 17 and 20) indicates notice has been provided to the Vicklund’s prohibiting them from using the private drives to head east. Jerry Janacek spoke at the September 25, 2018 public hearing and submitted the written comments in Attachment 25 at the hearing. Mr. Janacek was primarily concerned about future development and protection of the critical areas in the vicinity of the Excelsior Place vacation. Staff Response: The subject vacation is not specifically a development proposal. Any subsequent development on the property must be consistent with the City of Edmonds Critical Area regulations. One of the public benefits associated with the proposed vacation is that vacating this portion of Excelsior Place would allow a lot line adjustment to be processed that would result in avoiding impacts to critical areas in the area. Ken Reidy submitted an email to City Council on September 25, 2018 (Attachment 26) questioning to the City requiring an appraisal at time of application and requested clarification on state law with regard to one of the potential options for the City Council in approving the vacation (Option B discussed in Section VI of this staff report). Staff Response: Pursuant to ECDC 20.70.060.G, an appraisal prepared by a qualified land appraiser with an M.A.I. is an application requirement. Staff’s recommendation is not to the Option the Mr. Reidy is seeking clarification on state law. Should the Council wish to move forward with Option B, they may wish to seek clarification from the City Attorney on these questions. V. TECHNICAL COMMITTEE This application was reviewed and evaluated by Snohomish County Fire District #1 and City of Edmonds Engineering and Maintenance & Operations Divisions of Public Works. Snohomish County Fire District #1: Snohomish County Fire District #1 provided the following comments and recommendations (Attachment 11): 4.9.b Packet Pg. 233 Attachment: Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachments (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - PLN20180021 – Excelsior Place Street Vacation Page 4 of 14 1. No easement is currently required. If property in the area of vacation is developed and the vacation area will serve three or more lots, an emergency access road consistent with Snohomish County Fire District No. 1 Fire Lane Standards will be required. 2. The fire hydrant located in the vacation area is to remain a public hydrant. City of Edmonds Engineering and Maintenance & Operations Divisions: The Engineering Division provided the following comments and recommendation regarding the proposed street vacation (Attachment 12): The Engineering and Maintenance & Operations Divisions of Public Works have reviewed the subject application and recommend approval of the proposed Excelsior Place street vacation. The proposal was found to meet the street vacation criteria established in Edmonds Community Development Code 20.70.020 as it relates to transportation and utility systems. 1) Traffic flow and sight distance concerns were reviewed in consideration of the subject Excelsior Place street vacation. That portion of Excelsior Place right-of-way subject this street vacation, is connected to other sections of City right-of-way (Puget Drive to the west and 196th St SW to the east) through private roadways. The currently accessible public portions of Excelsior Place right-of-way are highlighted in the map below. That portion of Excelsior Place right-of-way adjacent to 19515 and 19511 does not directly connect to Puget Drive or 196th St SW right-of-ways. A couple residents off 94th Pl W (the western extents of Excelsior Place) have informed the City of their historical use of the private roads on the eastern extents of the proposed vacation, however, the information submitted to the City as part of the street vacation indicates only certain properties have easements of record. Please refer to Attachment 15 of the staff report. The applicant provided additional 4.9.b Packet Pg. 234 Attachment: Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachments (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - PLN20180021 – Excelsior Place Street Vacation Page 5 of 14 information to the City on September 25th further purporting the properties on the west side of Excelsior Place do not have access through the private access road on the east side of Excelsior Place. Photos were provided showing “private driveway” signage (Attachment 21). The applicant also stated “over the past 18 years we continually have stopped traffic trying to pass through on these driveways. We have spoken to ALL the property owners on the west end and they are all aware that there is no legal access through our driveway or across the driveways to the east” (Attachment 17). While some of the residents have stated they have historically used these private driveways, it appears as though this has not been a permissible action by the owners of the property in which the driveway is located. In addition to traffic flow, the City received comments regarding sight distance concerns at the intersection of 94th Pl W and Puget Drive. The City Transportation Engineer reviewed sight distance at this intersection and determined that it does not comply with standards. To meet sight distance standards, a motorist exiting 94th Pl W onto Puget Drive should have clear sight lines to the east for a distance of 300-ft. This lineal footage is based upon the speed posted on the road, which is 30mph. The current sight distance is 200-ft, which falls 100-ft short of being in compliance. However, this has been a long standing issue that was specifically identified during review of a short plat (S-12-81) in 1982. The engineering requirements established by the City Engineer at the time, Jim Adams, restricted the turning movement onto 196th to a right turn only (Attachment 22). It has been confirmed that signage currently exists along Puget Drive (196th) and at the intersection of 94th Pl W to restrict traffic movements to right-in and right-out (Attachment 23). With this analysis, it has been determined that the street vacation has little to no effect on the existing traffic flow and sight distance conditions. 2) In addition to the transportation considerations, the City currently owns and maintains a sanitary sewer main and water main, including a fire hydrant through the subject vacation area. 4.9.b Packet Pg. 235 Attachment: Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachments (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - PLN20180021 – Excelsior Place Street Vacation Page 6 of 14 Operation and maintenance of utilities is more efficient when utilities are located within a public right-of-way versus a private easement. This is found to be true as decisions regarding the use of the right-of-way remains with the public and access to the utility systems is not restricted by a private property owner. In this particular case, the existing water and sewer mains are located mostly within the existing paved driveway area, which helps to prevent the overgrowth of vegetation and backyard improvements that tend to be the most burdensome in maintaining utility systems located within easements. In addition, the applicant has offered to provide a public safety and utility easement turn-around as a condition of the subject street vacation (Attachment 17). The turn-around area would be seen as a public benefit as it would improve existing access conditions and provide an unobstructed area for public safety and utility maintenance & operations vehicles to maneuver within the limited space. When City utilities exist within an area to be vacated, staff considers whether the utility systems should remain public or become private should the street vacation be approved. In this particular case, it would be appropriate for City to continue to own and maintain the utility systems for the following reasons: a. The subject street vacation abuts 19511 94th Pl W and within the boundaries of these limits, there is not a clear point in the utility systems to distinguish between public and private ownership. In finding a point at which this clear distinction could be made, public utilities would either fall within private property or private utilities would fall within public right-of-way. 4.9.b Packet Pg. 236 Attachment: Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachments (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - PLN20180021 – Excelsior Place Street Vacation Page 7 of 14 b. If the water main were to become private, the water meters would need to be re-located to fall within City right-of-way and new water service lines would need to be run to the individual properties. This would create long runs of water service line, which could create long term maintenance issues. c. With the relocation of the water meters, the private water main and fire hydrant would essentially serve as a private fire line. The change from a public water main to a private fire line would spur the requirement for the property owners to install a backflow assembly in a vault in order to provide water quality protection between the public water system and the private fire line. d. The sewer main could provide sewer service to other properties in the area should those lots be developed in the future. VI. ECDC 20.70 – STREET VACATIONS A. ECDC 20.70.050 Initiation of Proceedings Pursuant to ECDC 20.70.050.B a vacation may be initiated by petition of the owners of more than two-thirds of property abutting the portion of the street or alley to be vacated. Three property owners abut this portion of Excelsior Place. The two property owners lying north and south of the right-of-way, Edgar Mallory Living Trust (represented by Duane Landsverk) and A.P. VanMeter, that would receive half of the vacated right-of-way should the Council approve the vacation signed the petition to vacate (Attachment 2). A third property owner whose property (9123 – 196th Street SW) is located at the western terminus of Excelsior Place did not sign the vacation request. Since two-thirds of the property owners abutting the right-of-way signed the vacation request, the initiation of vacation proceedings is compliant with ECDC 20.70.050. B. ECDC 20.70.020 Criteria for Vacation The City Council may vacate a street, alley or easement only if it finds the following criteria have been met: 1. The vacation is in public interest. The applicants submitted a statement in support of the public interest criterion (Attachment 3). The applicants note that the proposed street vacation would vacate a substandard road and revert the road back to private ownership. The proposed street to be vacated was created as a 20-foot right-of-way in 1906 as part of the Edmonds Sea View Tracts plat (Attachment 13). Since that time, the 4.9.b Packet Pg. 237 Attachment: Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachments (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - PLN20180021 – Excelsior Place Street Vacation Page 8 of 14 right-of-way has not been widened or improved to current city street standards. The portion of right-of-way to be vacated is presently maintained by the adjoining property owners. The applicants argue it is in the public interest to return the right-of-way to private ownership, where the current adjoining owners will continue to maintain property that they can then lawfully own and relieve the city of any financial burden or liability that comes with public right-of- way. In addition, the applicants offered to provide a public safety and utility easement turn-around, which could also be seen as providing a public benefit. This street vacation petition was precipitated by a lot line adjustment application made under file number PLN20170050 (Attachment 14). The lot line adjustment proposes to rearrange five lots of record (also created via the Edmonds Sea View Tracts plat) in order to develop that lots in a manner that would have less impact on the critical areas within the surrounding area (steep slopes, wetland and stream). See Attachment 27 demonstrating the location of critical areas in relation to the existing and proposed lot lay out. The lot line adjustment application had one of the newly configured lots bisected by Excelsior Place. The City’s Engineering Division noted that in order to approve the proposed lot line adjustment either a street vacation request must be submitted and approved or the lot line adjustment must be altered so no lot is bisected by the Excelsior Place right-of-way. In an effort to avoid and minimize impacts to the critical areas, the applicants chose to pursue the street vacation. The lot line adjustment application has been put on hold pending the outcome of the street vacation request. City staff reviewed the information provided by the applicant, existing site conditions - including traffic flow and public utility systems, comments received from the public and documentation related to previous development of the area. With the analysis outlined in this staff report, staff has concluded the proposed street vacation meets the public interest criterion. 2. No property will be denied direct access as a result of the vacation. The applicants indicated the portion of right-of-way requested to be vacated serves as access to the five legal lots as noted on the lot line adjustment application referenced above (Attachment 3). As currently configured, three of the five properties have direct frontage on Excelsior Place, while the other two rely on private easements for access to the Excelsior Place public right-of-way. Should the vacation and lot line adjustment both be approved, the rearrangement of lot lines would allow all five lots to have direct access to the vacated portion of Excelsior Place through a shared private access road easement. A series of private access easements (both existing and proposed with the street vacation) would provide direct access to Puget Drive and/or 196th Street SW. 4.9.b Packet Pg. 238 Attachment: Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachments (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - PLN20180021 – Excelsior Place Street Vacation Page 9 of 14 The applicants provided a map (Attachment 15) and access easements of record (Attachment 16) related to the private access roads serving residences on the eastern and western extents of the proposed Excelsior Place vacation. The western extent of this section of Excelsior Place connects to a private road, 94th Place West, which serves five residences and provides access to Puget Drive. The eastern extent connects to another private road which provides access to eight houses and ultimately ties into 196th Street SW, a public street. Additional information was provided by the applicants to support their position that properties on the west end of Excelsior Place do not have rights to access the private access easement area on the east side of Excelsior Place (Attachments 17, 20, and 21). The applicants have noted that only 19511 – 94th Place West has legal access from the west and east ends of the proposed Excelsior Place vacation. In summary, no properties would be denied direct access as a result of the vacation. C. ECDC 20.70.040 Limitations on Vacations 1. Pursuant to ECDC 20.70.040.A, “the city may not vacate any street, alley, easement, or part thereof that abuts any body of water unless all elements of RCW 35.79.035 are complied with, and the vacated area will thereby become available for the city or other public entity to acquire and to use for a public purpose.” The proposed vacation area does not abut any bodies of water. 2. Pursuant to ECDC 20.70.040.B, “the city shall not proceed with the vacation if the owners of 50 percent or more of the property abutting the street or alley or part thereof, or underlying the easement or part thereof, to be vacated file a written objection in the planning division prior to the time of the hearing.” As of the writing of this staff report, the City has not received any written objections to the proposed street vacation. D. ECDC 20.70.140 Final Decision 1. ECDC 20.70.140.A provides the following: Following the public hearing, the city council shall, by motion approved by a majority of the entire membership in a roll call vote, either: 1. Adopt an ordinance granting the vacation; or 2. Adopt a motion denying the vacation; or 4.9.b Packet Pg. 239 Attachment: Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachments (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - PLN20180021 – Excelsior Place Street Vacation Page 10 of 14 3. Adopt a resolution of intent to vacate stating that the city council will, by ordinance, grant the vacation if the owner(s) of property abutting upon the street or alley, or part thereof so vacated, meet specific conditions within 90 days. The city may require the following as conditions: a. Either: i. Monetary compensation to be paid to the city in the amount of up to one-half the fair market value for the street, alley, or part thereof to be vacated unless acquired at “public expense,” then full appraised value shall be paid; or ii. The grant of a substitute public right-of-way which has value as an access way at least equal to the vacated street, alley, or part thereof; or iii. Any combination of subsections (A)(3)(a)(i) and (A)(3)(a)(ii) of this section totaling but not more than one-half the fair market value of the street, alley, or part thereof to be vacated. OR b. A grant of an easement to the city in exchange for the easement vacated. If the abutting property owner(s) complies with conditions imposed in the resolution of intent to vacate within 90 days, the city council shall adopt an ordinance granting the vacation. 2. The City Council has three options with the current street vacation application. The Council may a) Deny the vacation petition, b) Approve the vacation subject to the applicant assuming ownership of the utilities in the right-of-way and require monetary compensation for the right-of-way to be vacated, or c) Approve the vacation subject to the granting of an easement to the City of Edmonds for the public utilities located within the right-of-way. Each option is discussed below. a. Deny the application: Should the City Council find the street vacation petition does not meet the criteria for vacation in ECDC 20.70.020, the City Council may deny the street vacation. In recent street vacations before the City Council, it has been noted that the monetary compensation for the vacation supports the public interest criteria. If easements are retained for 4.9.b Packet Pg. 240 Attachment: Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachments (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - PLN20180021 – Excelsior Place Street Vacation Page 11 of 14 the public utilities (as noted in option c below), then pursuant to ECDC 20.70.140.A.3 the City cannot receive monetary compensation. The City could relinquish ownership of the utilities (as noted in option b below); however, the Public Works Utilities Maintenance & Operations Division finds it to be in the public interest to retain ownership of the utilities. b. Approve the vacation subject to the applicant assuming ownership of the utilities in the right-of-way and requiring monetary compensation for the right-of-way to be vacated: City owned utilities are located within the Excelsior Place right-of-way, including a water main with fire hydrant and a sanitary sewer main (Attachment 5). Should the City Council desire to receive monetary compensation for the street vacation, the Council could condition vacation approval on the applicant assuming ownership of the utilities and requiring compensation for half the appraised value of the area to be vacated. An appraisal prepared by an MAI certified appraiser was submitted in support of the vacation petition (Attachment 7). The appraised value of the right-of-way proposed for vacation is $10,800. Pursuant to ECDC 20.70.140.A.3.a.i, the city can require monetary compensation up to one-half of the appraised value, which $5,400 the proposed vacation. As noted, the city utilities in the right-of-way consist of a sanitary sewer main and water main with fire hydrant (Attachment 5). The water main, besides providing water service to several properties along Excelsior Place, supplies water to an existing public fire hydrant which Snohomish County Fire District No. 1 requested to remain public. In addition to the Fire District’s comments, the Public Works Utilities Maintenance & Operations Division has indicated a desire to retain ownership of the utilities due to the extent of modifications to the water system that would be required to make the system private, along with the benefits that come with operating and maintaining City utilities located within public right-of-way. The City Council should consider the low appraised value of the right-of-way along with Public Works’ and the Fire District’s desire to maintain ownership of the utilities in the right-of-way in evaluating this option. c. Approve the vacation subject to the granting of easements to the City of Edmonds for the utilities located within the right-of-way: Public benefit can be seen through eliminating any financial burden or liability that comes with public right-of-way, by providing a street turn-around, and through subsequent reconfiguration of lots that will mitigate potential development impacts on existing critical areas. Access will not be denied to any properties. Sight distance concerns have been raised at the intersection of 4.9.b Packet Pg. 241 Attachment: Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachments (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - PLN20180021 – Excelsior Place Street Vacation Page 12 of 14 94th Pl W and Puget Drive; however, it has been concluded that this is a pre- existing condition currently managed by restricting turning movements at the intersection to right-in and right-out. The subject street vacation will not improve nor make worse this condition. Based on the analysis throughout this report, staff recommends approving the subject street vacation conditioned upon securing a utility easement for the public water and sewer utilities located within Excelsior Place and the development of a public safety and utility easement turn-around. VII. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The subject site is located within the “Single Family – Resource” designation of the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan has the following stated goals and policies for Residential Development that apply to this project. Residential Development A. Goal. High quality residential development which is appropriate to the diverse lifestyle of Edmonds residents should be maintained and promoted. The options available to the City to influence the quality of housing for all citizens should be approached realistically in balancing economic, social, aesthetic and environmental considerations. A.1. Encourage those building custom homes to design and construct homes with architectural lines which enable them to harmonize with the surroundings, adding to the community identity and desirability. A.3. Minimize encroachment on view of existing homes by new construction or additions to existing structures. A.4. Support retention and rehabilitation of older housing within Edmonds whenever it is economically feasible. A.5. Protect residential areas from incompatible land uses through the careful control of other types of development and expansion based upon the following principles: A.5.b. Traffic not directly accessing residences in a neighborhood must be discouraged A.5.d. Private property must be protected from adverse environmental impacts of development including noise, drainage, traffic, slides, etc. A.6. Require that new residential development be compatible with the natural constraints of slopes, soils, geology, drainage, vegetation and habitat. (Comprehensive Plan, Pg. 66) 4.9.b Packet Pg. 242 Attachment: Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachments (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - PLN20180021 – Excelsior Place Street Vacation Page 13 of 14 Nothing in the proposed right-of-way vacation is in conflict with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. Additionally, the proposal is not in conflict with the goals and policies of the Transportation Comprehensive Plan. The proposed street vacation would be consistent with the City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan. VIII. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION Based on the analysis in and the attachments to this report, staff finds the requested vacation of Excelsior Place to be in accordance with the criteria in ECDC 20.70.020 and the Comprehensive Plan. Therefore, staff recommends APPROVAL of the street right-of- way vacation with the following conditions: 1. A public utility easement shall be provided to the City of Edmonds for the installation, construction, operation, maintenance, repair, reconstruction and/or replacement of the water and sewer systems and necessary appurtenances, over, across, through, and below the subject Excelsior Place vacation. 2. A utility access and emergency vehicle turn-around shall be constructed to City standards and easement shall be provided in a location agreed upon by the property owners and the City Engineering Division and Snohomish County Fire District No. 1. 3. A private access easement shall be provided to all lots with frontage on the vacated portion of Excelsior Place. 4. If property in the area of vacation is developed and the vacation area will serve three or more lots, an emergency access road consistent with Snohomish County Fire District No. 1 Fire Lane Standards will be required. IX. ATTACHMENTS 1. Land Use Application 2. Petition for Vacation 3. Applicant Response Letter 4. Legal Description and Survey 5. Survey with Utilities 6. Applicant Location Map 7. MAI Appraisal 8. Resolution No. 1417 9. Zoning and Vicinity Map 10. Public Notice Documentation 11. Snohomish County Fire District No. 1 Comments 12. Engineering Division Comments 13. Edmonds Sea View Tracts Plat 4.9.b Packet Pg. 243 Attachment: Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachments (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - PLN20180021 – Excelsior Place Street Vacation Page 14 of 14 14. Proposed Lot Line Adjustment under PLN20170050 15. Easement Access Map 16. Related Access Easements 17. Landsverk September 25, 2018 Email 18. 1984 Correspondence Regarding 94th PL W and Puget Drive 19. 1984 Letter from City of Edmonds City Engineer Regarding 94th PL W and Puget Drive 20. Documentation limiting Vicklund’s access to and through Landsverk Property 21. Photos of “Private Drive” signage 22. Recommendation traffic mitigations from S-12-81 23. Traffic Flow Signage 24. Vicklund September 21, 2018 Email 25. Janacek September 25, 2018 Written Testimony 26. Reidy September 25, 2018 Email 27. Critical Area and Lot Layout Map 28. September 25, 2018 Draft Council Minutes X. PARTIES OF RECORD City of Edmonds 121 – 5th Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 Duane and Deanne Landsverk Edgar Mallory Living Trust 24113 – 56th Avenue West Mountlake Terrace, WA 98043 A.P. VanMeter 9055 – 196th Street SW Edmonds, WA 98020 Lee Michaelis Puget Sound Planning 24113 – 56th Avenue West Mountlake Terrace, WA 98043 Shirely and John Vicklund 19515 94th Place West Edmonds, WA 98020 Jerry and Barbara Janacek 19228 92nd Avenue West Edmonds, WA 98020 Ken Reidy 771 8th Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 4.9.b Packet Pg. 244 Attachment: Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachments (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - City of Edmonds Land Use Applic, tion rrtu + PL,n/Zi2!8-0 0ÐJ zoNE - DArE 3' i3't€ REC'DBY vvr 3 eeu.-í GÐ- Rrceipr# t] FIE tr STAFF tr PB ! ADB tr CC HEARIN,jDATE I tr tr tr l ! ü I I uÍ ü u n D ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN REVIEW COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CoNDITIONAL USE PERMIT HoME OCCUPATION FORMAL SUBDIVISION SHORT SUBDIVISION LoT LINE ADJUSTMENT PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT OFFICIAL STREET MAP AMENDMENT STREET VACATION REZONE SHORELINE PERMIT VARÌANCE / REASONABLE USE EXCEPTION OTHER: . PLEASE NOTE THAT ALL INI.oRMATIoN CoNTAINED VITHIN THE APPLICATION IS .4 PUßLIC RECORD . pROpERTy ADDRESS OR LOCATION¡ ROw adjacent ro 19511 94th pL W PROJECT NAME (IF APPLICABLE)Edmonds BLA PROPERTY OwNItR Dune Landsverk Pgo¡¡e # 42\-l42t-"t42 ADDRESS 241 13 56th Avç W Mountlake Terrace , WA 98043 E-MAIL dual€@lqh-inc.com FAX # TAX ACCOUNT # 000043460000s805 SEC. 13 T'wP. 27 RNG. 03 DEScRrprroN oF PRoJEcr oR Pnoroslo usn IATTAcH coveR LETTER AS NECESSAR adjacent to l95l I 94th PL W. Street vacation ofthe ROW DESCRIBE How THE PROJECT MEETS APPLICABLE CODES (ATTACH COVER LETTER AS NECESSAR APPLIcANT Hmah Philbrick pHONe# 206-2s0-'t9s2 ADDRESS 241 13 56th Ave W Mountlake Tenace, WA 98043 E-MAIL hannah@pugetsoundplæning.com F¡x # CONTACT PERgg¡/d6p,¡1 Lee A Michaelis p¡19¡g # ¿zs-szo-to¿r, ADDRESS 24113 56th Ave W Mountlake Tenace, WA 98043 E-MAIL lee.michaelis@pugetsoundplming.com FAX # The undersigned applicant, and his/her/its heirs, and assigns, in consideration on the processing of the application agrees to release, indemnifr, defend and hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any and all damages, including reasonable attomey's fees, arising from any action or infraction based in whole or part upon false, misleading, inaccurate or incomplete information fumished by the applicant, his/her/its agents or employees. By my signature, I certi$r that the information and that I am authorized to lile;his application and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge on the behalfofthe owner as listed below. SIGNATURE oF DATE Property Owner's Authorization L Dun^¿--LaJst*¿-'certify urder the penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that the following is a true and conect statement: I have authorized the above ApplicanVAgent to apply for the subject land use application, and grant my permission for the public officials and the staffof the City of Edmonds to enter the subject prope(y for the purposes of inspection and posting attendant to this application. SIGNATIIRE oF Questions? Call (425) 7 7 1 -0220. Revised on 8/22/l 2 B - Land Use Application Page I of lAttachment 1 4.9.b Packet Pg. 245 Attachment: Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachments (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - Edgar Mallory Living Trust 247t3 56th Ave. W. Mountlake Terrace, WA 98043 RECETI/Er} l'tAR - . ZÏtg ¡:,:|ttå\lifrI[ì i. TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN Per the terms of the Edgar Mallory Living Trust dated June 24, 2008: Duane Landsverk and or/ Deanne Landsverk are both Trustees for the Edgar Mallory Living Trust. Both individually or both jointly may act for and conduct business on behalf of the trust without the consent of any other Trustee. nne Landsverk D n Co-Trustee Co-Trustee Attachment 1 4.9.b Packet Pg. 246 Attachment: Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachments (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - PETITION F'OR STREET OR ALLEY VACATIONTO: TI{E HONORABLE Crry COLJNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WAStr{INGTON\le, lbe undersigned olvneñi of trvo-thirds of the real property abutting upon that public rigþtof-way deseribed below, pursuant to RC\ry 35.79.010,do hereby petition úe City of Edmonds to vacate said public right-of-way, rlessribod æ follows:all. siù¡¿æ inthe City of Edmonds, C¡uúy of Snohomis\ State oflfashingtorl and request thæ said City Councit by Resolution fix a time and place whenthis Petition sb¿ll be heard and determined by that authority, r¡'hich time shall not be more than sixty (60) days nor less than twenty (20) days after thepassage of such ResolutionThese pages are a group ofpages containing an identical text and prayer intenderl by the signers ofttris Petition to be presented and considered as onoPetition and rnay be filed witì other pages containing additional sþatures which cumulatively may be considered as a single Pøition.W-ARNING: Every person who signs this petition with any other than his or her true naÍie, or who lnowingly sig's more than one of these petitions, orsigns a petition seeking an election when he or she is not a legal voter, or signs a petition when he.or she is oúherwise not qualifiod tcr sing, or who makesherein any false statemed, shall be guilty of a nrisde¡neanor.PRAYER Otr PETIIION: Fort]evacation ofSTV¡CPEI-mC¿0ÀIOV-96f,ECE r/Ërtí/'R : " Ztlg' ,4T1#UllgË i,,FILES/ÀIASIEß/TMISC¡/t /ts//t /tQil1ii( 1?fL ?t,v)Pa;s l9(ri 54/ zØ-n, ¿n'!-.nrlsuo- [,l)i,,^n^ o.-4"/2r"2/--äø,zruPageofAttachment 24.9.bPacket Pg. 247Attachment: Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachments July 11,2018 RECEMED JUL 2 3 2rTS DEVELOPgEilTsER\/lcES PSP Puget Sound Planning lalncj use ctnsuf ting Jen Machuga, Associate Planner City of Edmonds 121 5th Avenue North Edmonds WA 98020 Jeannie McConnell, Engineering Program Manager RE: StreetVacationRequestAdjacenttol9Sll 94thPl.W(FileNumberPLN20180021) Jen & Jeannie Please accept this letter on behalf of the project applicants, in response to your letter of May 3, 2018. The review comments, from your letter, are numbered in this letter and are addressed in ihlícs as follows: Please accept this letter and the attached documents to continue your review, 1. Provide a cover letter indicating compliance with all applicable review criteria of Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) Chapter 20.70 and indicating how all the comments below have been addressed with your resubmittal. Please accept the following nanative as our cover letter addresstng the review criteria for vacation found in Chapter 20.70.020 (Criteria forVacation) of the ECDC. "A, The vacation is in the public interest; and" The proposed sfreef vacation would vacate a substandard road and revertthe road back to private ownershíp. The proposed sfreef to be vacated is a porfion of Excelsior Ptace that was created as a 20' right of way as part of the original Plat of Ednonds Sea Víew Tractsin 1906. Since thattime,therightof wayhasnotbeenwidenedorimproved to cunent cig standards for public residential sfreefs. The portion of roadway to be vacated is presently maintained by the adjoining propefi owners and not the City of Ednonds. lf is in the public inúeresf to return the right of way back to private ownership, where the current adioining owners will continue to maintain property that they can then lawfully own and relieve the city of any financial burden or liabilig that comes with public right of way. Vacating the portion of right of way wilt also altow the cunent city street to became prìvate property where it can be taxed like all residenfial property in the Ci$ of Edmonds. "8. No property will be denied direct açcess as a result of the vacation." The portion of right of way requesting to be vacated currently se,ves as access to îive iegal lots as sfiown on the Boundary Line Adjustment application submitted with the vacation reguesf. Currently, fhree of fhos e five properties have direct frontage on Excelsior Place, while the other two would rely on easemenfs for access fo public right of way. Foltowing the Boundary Line Adiustment and creation of private ingress/egress easemenfs all 5 lots would have dlrect access fo an access easement which provide direcf access fo a public right of way (Puget Drive). Chapter 20.70.040 (Limitations on Vacation) "A. Areas thatWay NotBeVacated. The ci$ may notvacate any streel alley, easement, or partthereof that abuts any body oî water unless all elemenfs of RCW 35.79.035 are complied with, and the vacated area will thereby become available for the city or other publíc entity to acquire and to use for a public Puget Sound Planning 5005 200r" Street SW, Suite 101-ts | L.ynnwood WA 98036 425 830 1 046 | lee. rnichaelrs@pugelsoundplannin g corn I www. pugetsoundplannrng.com Attachment 3 4.9.b Packet Pg. 248 Attachment: Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachments (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - P6PJuly 11 , 2018 purpose." The portion of right of way requesting to be vacated does not abut any body of water; therefore' this code section does not apply. "8. Objection by Propefi Owner, The city shall not proceed with the vacation iî the owners of 50 percent or more of the propefi abutting the street ar alley or part thereof , or underlying the easement or part thereof, to be vacated file a written objection in the planning division prior to the time of the hearing." As provided with our initial submittal, 100 percent of the proper$ owners who abut the sfreef are in îavor of fåe sfreef vacation. 2. Provide a surveyimap that shows the proposed area of vacation along with existing improvements. Attached lor your review is a map showing fñe proposed area of vacation along with fñe exisfing improvements within the area to be vacated, 3. Pursuant to ECDC 20.70.020.4, one of the criteria the City Council must consider in evaluating a street vacation is whetherthe vacation is in the public interest. Please submit a statement regarding what public interest would be served by the vacation of this portion of right-otway. Pleaseseefñeresponse underCommentI above. Thepublicinferesfs insummaryinclude, release of financiat burden needed to maintain a public right of way; release of liability associated with public right of way regarding accidenfs and injury; and increase in tax revenue as fñe propefi ls vacafed and returned to private residential owned property. 4. Pursuant to ECDC 20.70,020.8, the City Council may vacate a street if it finds that "no property will be denied direct access as a result of the vacation." Please provide evidence of how the proposed street vacation would not deny direct access to any properties. The survey provided with the pending lot line adjustment application (P1N20170050) indicates a portion of the driveway, at the NE corner of the street vacation, is currently located within the City right-otway. Please see fhe response under Comment I above. The portion of driveway referenced is for the house located at 9055 196r,, Sf Sl,y. The property owner is pad .to the sfreef vacation and would receive one hatf the width of the right of way upon sfreef vacatio¡i. The referenced driveway would then be consolídafed with the propefi located at905519ôn' Sf Sl'y. 5. P/ease provide documentation indicating how the subject right-of-way was originally deeded to the Ctty of Edmonds. Confirm whether the right-of-way was deeded by properties on both srdes of the right-of- way or just one side, The appraisa/ seems to indicate the right-of-way was deeded entirely frsm the parceltothesouth addressed as19511 94tl1Pl.W. lf thiswasnot ffiecase, theappraisalshouldbe revised accordingly. Excelsior Place was created in 1906 with thç recording of the Plat of Edmonds Sea View Tracts. Neither the properties to the north, nor the property to the south dedicated land to create Excelsior Place. The right af way and lots were created atthe same fime from the larger parcel as descnbed on the face of the recorded plat. Pursuant to RCW 35.79.040 Title to Vacated Sfreef, it is agreed on by atl parties of the petition, that each abutting property owner would receive one-half the width of the vacated sfreef. Page 2 City of Ëdmonds File No. P1N20180Û21Attachment 3 4.9.b Packet Pg. 249 Attachment: Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachments (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - P$PJuly 11.2018 6. ECDC 20.70.060.G requires "an appraisal prepared by a qualified land appraiser with an M.A.l. designation, establishing the fair market value of the street, alley, or part thereof to be vaçated." P/ease respond to the following comnents relatsd to the appraisal provided with your application: a. The code requiresthatthe appraisalbe prepared by an appraiserwtth an M.A.L designation. tt is unclear if Mr, McGauhey has an M.A.l, designation. Please either provide evidence that Mr. McGauhey has this designation or provide an appraisal by an appraiser with this designation. Attached úo fhis cover letter is e new appreisal prepared by James B. Price, MAI of the Appraisal Group oîthe NW b. The appraisal pravided with your application concludes that vacation of the subiect right-ol way would add only $4,A00 in value to the adjacent propefty addressed 19511 94th Pl, W. The appraisal concludes that the additional lot area would add minimal value to the subiect site; however, the appraisal does not appear to consider the effecfs of a future proposed /of line adjustment (referto separate pending application PLN20170050), which ts onlypossib/e with vacation of the subject segment af right-of-way and/or any increased potential in being able to subdivide or create additional lots in the general area, Please see fñe attached reyised appraisal for the new appraised value and rationale used fo appraise the portion of vacated right of way c. The appraisal refers to the subject right-of-way as betng "the remnant of an unused road originally platted, but never developed nar used, " However, fhrs secfíon of rþht-of-way was in fact improved, but with a character that more closely matches a private driveway. This should be clarified in the appraisal. The revised report refers to the vacated portion of right of way as descrlbed and graphically depicted by the surveyor exhibiß. d. The City Councit recently approved a resolution of intent to vacate a portion of unopened right-of-way appraximately 20 feet by 320 feet in size adjacent to the properties addressed 10410 and 10430 231st Sf. Stl/lF,/e No. PLN20170052) forwhich fhe assessed valuewas $57,60A. Nthough there are differences in the circumsfances related to that application and the subject application, the difference in assessed value between fhese two applications is sizeable, which gives reason to question the accuracy of the subject appraisal. Please note, future submittals may be senf fo an outside consultant for peer review, The revised report attached to this caver letter concludes thatthe value of the portion of right of way to be vacated is $10,800 more than two and a half times the previous report. 7. Clfy G/S utitity maps (see below) indicate water and sewer mains exist within the existing public right'of way. Please show exisfrng City utilities located within the proposed sfreef vacation area, as well as other dry utitities that may exisf such as power, phone, cable, etc. Additionally, please note that should the right-of-way be vaçated, the City will either require easomenfs to be retained for utilitíes or deternine that ownership of City utilities should be transferred to the private propefty owners, The map showing the area proposed for vacation also includes the city water and sewer mains. There are utility lines iusf oufside of the right of way and other private utilities are located oufside the portion of the right of way to be vacated. Page 3 tity of Ëdmonds tile No. P1N20180021Attachment 3 4.9.b Packet Pg. 250 Attachment: Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachments (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - P$PJuly 11,2018 Thank you for accepting and reviewing this document as part of the requested street vacation. lf you should need additional information in the processing and review of this submittal, please contact me at lee.michaelis@pugetsoundplanning.com or (425) 830-1 046. Sincerely, Puget Sound Planning Lee A. Michaelis, AICP Page 4 City of Edmonds File No. P1N30180û21Attachment 3 4.9.b Packet Pg. 251 Attachment: Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachments (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - a^27 tt.R3.è. H;til,{îiüffiffi.:"" ' s#f$î'ffii*t""*-, .r", tru¡iy L yrwt, tu"rt Mfi m.t¿,¡¿g!Ét.SEA VIE\V nffi;il,i*r,ii å nn-s&' [¡Ñn í-üx¡ta' bÄtt I'o¿ì. l,J€r¡ ¿ C T S !.rèrþ^r"kh*;,,ïî*'fa *H**w&IR Fûãí|r"::íiÉM PL'r Ávdumltld trÉttr i@6 ÐßdgrNltY ouaucåI ftï+J !Wêr../ Þ¡ørr \d¡ñ tatt d Olidd n cd4 nlrl-iñatt ¡r wHlat, cdt Mu .t tut J kt1t.lût Se ttrte L1/Asetyarop U*ttttt¡o Poa¡tot 6ot¡aoat.¡ Lot N'¿ å t $ TRA Scate ltucn - SOO aÃ¿7. Morch -9 -t9ôó ÐEt ilr I \ Ctut 6tetn¿aas I\ À E( ò í /,t c tt ,o ^r' oY ao- -"- ,u{ .¡ ,1, 4^ 'o f5ße 7tfc heNil 8. 0fEid ¡p-?L *ntf' 4 {tùô ¡0 o h,. rt"¿ ./'a.-..N 5.^ v''-NtN)tÉ{ ñ, ì.ti\ \)) \"--\\-...t'rUr{' r*twÃtø'rw ¿æÈ,lUrRre_.vdtñ.. l, 1.1 d oflici.l âæùd, Ea. lZ.?oE^il v. wrllrAÀts. cdnty r;l|Lfrí1 f...,t' tactet.s dt. fè4.*.àt.t.t.'ttu tã¿1t i^ Sà.hd-ö a..nlt 7,.^ì! af/ lı1¿. ..|tr. a,ù. ./ f '. N..^ ê.. á.t/ ./ d. A c/ J".¿..',ù c.e.ù' V.!ô,.:¿... ñ. &.'.tt'ant a44 /.¡.haã Ò/ ar/ a'.tr t^,il.t.6 rá¡?..ù (q'in¿n'¿F L!ãt é.,r4 (a7) úutA C.-J¿ ,^...tr) ÈÁt. rl tÁ. f,,tt..,.¿. ùr.irÀ^ fà. Á^.'"r. ^úÍ ô/ .A. ôoed|..t tuett . (et ft' b) t$ ./, q 1ø. f,. (¿) lltht t.t6 ./ tl. ?th|',.J d¿ü4hi ó..,à,-t - ê.fi,..ùt ı1 ¿P.'^t .^ Á. ."ì t'. '/t'¡tS.¡a,^ Ã,,h.ã /'t), -^'.1 f..ãt ¡t f.r-/..a ^4ô ñt'ìt ^"d¿,.¿dt(la.to| ./r.,.! l.i^ ./ *. tta,f.' rftnaã co'¡t, l¡l*'¡¡ sa¡ 5dàil n,.¿..^ 'tt .nJ 5.¡n.1 Ãt^t..4 l.a/ t^ 7 af N 4 + 6 ,r'/ .¡) "sü' . ¿ã4 .rl^út ¿a.làtt d. ,,i^¿../. -.t tt|a.r ı 4. J.â'il. Âòr' þ'a¡â¡ã R^¡"nd a.h/.,t- éJ Ad.t H.a/.,.ttr .n¿ -,/. ,t ttl d'tN ilt¿¿-tl" ¿tt '.eo ../ ,...>d.J ¡\ vo... /ì .f Þ..rt ai P^t. atr y' d, 4.o'dt v 54 .'td d. d,t¡¡ "^./ /"t"î;ù .l^ilt¡'r4 '...b .;{t."èr .4 ?t!.3 .F- dr/.... / .t ¿à¡t .^¿ c..,.û ./. Jât4 5..à.,t tal h, ...tod ò¡.¡t á.aò t'd,../.¿ ¿t/J ã'. ¡1.-ã ". ã. ?t"t .ù¿ d. r.¡^¡¡.û o/ *^... rtu'*û. .(.,.t 1-t'.abl "/ ¡4. d.fe/,'. rl l, ,\ bt i..d. aaa fht d. t,..¿ .t..'.'¿'..t ,., /y'.. ",. ñ/.il¿ .. .ü¿ .oñ^..ı¿ oy' .1. f.'¿¿ 1/... â¿ ú. ñea ./ Êd', /,,¡¡ ¡4¿¿. ¡1,,¡ta Ac'.ãt. tl.*\ .. ã,i t'¿".¿¡, lh ø.a4àtt ¡.ro,¿.d ".^ ¿r,. ||..^ tÁ. ù.'.ttâ. ed .¡ ?4, f/.¿ ê/ nd. L.^¿t .^d¿ .J aría¿^ùa ¿r Ì¿' P^ttè' ã41 M¿.^4.' 5a >\ ù ¡t- '' \ \ ù¡\ ¡at ì t c"httaea Ô d. ..ãh, .f 'ta'ù '. ^4 '6J". î 2'ilRJâ ìl\,¡>'I t\\ N\r { ¡. ñ\ !¡\ 't\\ I Þ ul é+ óJ 6l 77 ,o 8t A? tt +9 te 10 05 8+ 6t --Tl i øt I ! as an streets,not a suryey modifìed by endorsement,any, the CompanYdepictcd. Except to the extenl a polioy oftille insurance is expressly or olher mÊtters shown thereon. does not insure dimensions, distances, locatiot" Attachment 3 4.9.b Packet Pg. 252 Attachment: Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachments (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - .\Ì'\tuey<lt¿¡ v g lg.n ,rò tott .'w/ rW .;;/îr¿'¿y;"",.:Tut logrr.a oz t¡¿J tqau.,¿ ¡t- ¿i' lo6t trôa tt¿tP'' øA rt*¿'a/ Qeias y..ú.r.!î Jè ¿..,..¿ ¿d Pr.þtt r.t r-r''rgl?oe/ tf)\¿w ¡/" loPp¿tcøy¡ î-'¿t.¡uu.' pua 2 én r:tu¿,2o¡d y4.,tx,p .ttú fe't, ./'¿.t.tfa/t"¿i:4/F "tdù¿ v.ll¿tt J.rl,v'J¿¿p.!îrd qfp,o/ao'¿ 7 g; 12zttouo2 \¡tto/aotz' ' ,ot/¿to¿¿l¿o¿ vt ¡:uo ltolttzç'3'tþn-tt7--L''.1 y¿¿ût,lt î toy ."¿1,,.p"a y'o vqs 4uôêJ yt.tz'téù¡ l¿.à¡orq Çu,oJ qJooq y /1t '!ûòr',t-_-_- ¡il¿ttu¡tt¡,ust¿ t.ttr¿cla a,'ry 'y¿ /è tñtJ,q¡¿À ç ¿ttltvto"'o' "'.u*¡ro, ,r, .,rt"a úuaÐ rt'N'puc /o '2'¿a'ril.¿t'o) $uaø¿ /a pto"7 ayt t7 pao,Jlyttttt'"s,litao2¿rlo7 't"'¡3gtat d V V-bw /. ¡lutt, .'g pt..ldL pú. Pt4,u¡EtX2*.tt rt a.'rr¡tt .øa¿rñ' ''.o.eg.ilsî{ !"t -ñ.!i'""¡lv.JoÙ,qî¿a !4 .¿uJçJ"N3 T,J9O 3lMON)'9Vil80¿¿tttya ote stattutsty¿ pttt¿l/t .Ju.t¿ry /.'a 9 '19 *,-u :lozoJeot r¿t u' ptôr.,t t9o2 a¿uttt'cl tr.g ,¿.àat tîa. t.!lÞpt r.yJ rø Æ4oA p'uc/o î"2ttù o Jo pa*o</ 4.p !îÐttuu /a p.toe/o úørapil! . þ t)'n /2 *y ectouo3 Ç yo.,/aot2 lttoc r,¡1 þ*ty. s."t,^'ao¿.tw ua.?¡ t¿uo) Pu! '1ta4t'rpø.2t ,auy' zqlaJty /o ti",p E ,¿"rryr¿r lgttty c.,p tut ¿a1ë ota1r>p /9uty ît6r..rt¿tdl at'4 v'5. co.onag-./c ¿"¡/ tty¡ dutculu'ot pu.¡¿¿v¿t ** /o ¿y'q'¡ e¿¡t'u' '.uãø ¿y|t 6t', Puù | a./6.ay..4 ¡.c ¿9¡ prctqr;¿r3. /.û.D rprð ¡..u'r4t y'ø oto¡J ¡"r''.--! qt &'.uy puo'us6u1yt16 e.ts' ¿yl l¿ h.r .y¿ ..su" La,,,, pur p,,'""Lê uoyotoúo: v tzttou,q ¿,,o¿/øt"2 ¿-g ¡J!.¡.¿J ...k, t, ,.¿,u //,, Àø,.N^.-- ! a,r /, O,,")¿NOILvJlAlO tt' |,,errriv,qq¡,io¿ç,s¿oltîpu't ¿u¿p.¡s¿¿¿ c¿t p¿o¡/*¿tct..v.¿¿Ã trt?¿ ¿e"a an4 2ar att ts ,..¡ ,ù. ru.( uc r.¡ .¿ù,t¿tt t.,/¡ /t.r.lz ft.91- .l.e,!rë.¿¿., ,¿r¡ /. .rt¡',4 to ?rt.a .ø t, o.!),¿.r.¿' r.ra...t,'.t?,r¡t.P t¿r.'r¿.p't¿¡r' lu,¡ù"r'ø.'¿e t9 l-yaa>.t u' 4plrt.Jn /2Vt"t!"uùù )ùt?'..¿d t't",tyt,/" t¿- a,". ,tr rt?! ynu' v.uút,p¿o P,"¡ q ..^dù9 1Pry/ùv.t¡',ty'o lor ryrú'at t9' tr¿.'/Jþ ry y'-ry¿ -r'p.¿t"t ¡oft¡ q2 ca rút, trilti)p,ìyq-ou2tø ¿/.t¿ p'v vúlt uoao'"J"2 p'"r/o f'n¿t,tt1 pt.lltct¡ e9ft¡2 ¡ør.y¿ ,v puv prt.!¿¿ú t.'¿'.p .¿!o¿¿N Fuo 1Þ1. tyt ,.y' :¿"¿sc¿ ia ,',."/è.Q P,eieW /- /'.r/r pu, tra ..ve¿!ó^ r,.o ¿"/.v""/ P"" ¡6 eê'¿ú)tP¿o 1-.'/vú¿1"!r'.èþ t")âtù ,t,fttlt.¿ ñw¿,¿¡C tut ¿.¿)a't..? y'ô¡.v lts ¿o9'ze o¿pî¿1-tuYcvy'þ¿tívà.t.s- 9.r tþ u¿¿/t..J þvî.t) p,ar.yJ ,y PûôtJù.P"tU yt"r tu 2,o/*tt5. 7 s Þ,¿¡ rW ,V lu.'tnlrt,P¿O î¿ttt.Jþôttt .V) pt¿.trt. ólb /ù. ,¿t ltrtrrúP'.þ.//Ò ,'t,orz¿¿ou.Jçpa/^"t2 /o r,"¿*tts 'er ry oJ ua.ur tu,E p,"./^"t2 usû¡3¿,ùotlu¿l'¡ry .g.roJ .arer r- "¿ p,"./^"'2 a î P¿¿w¿¿r 't"a.!.,y'','.!îe,trrÁ!" ¿tvs',v¿ ..J pilo n' tttkl úor¿il. 2tn6ttttpua ¿vJ tu/ ¿¿ó/'1 ,o.t ø vv¿.!d /. h2 ,,é t.,y¿ ,c t"y¿ t/t.e'vs' e.v¿!t"rlì:II.t'lI./{î¡?. fl¡ìr:l'tr..,) _,2","1...ù'l"li,.lI!liril.¡tsciì{5tqlìJJII.tt I et:F_ar!lru4'n,"r¡ r o.tt,n, L-,li 'iii:*:.#îHüilr.¡¡¡,,",r r .ã¡!,u .ni,,¡,¡¡t r/,"rJ'r.þ.9ñ¡ rrì¡s¡çtrrA to Çt tat¡,rr, J, o ;?r:l:d.¿!t. ru 5ú rrr ¡o ¡vJd¡¡ ,y6¿2 atot tr¿p¿¿J 4.4:rlItt1 g îòì+æIIfItlt¿tzìeIIffittd¿f,"*.. itf ifl\.1ttatsL1t9Ag¿13¿¿tet¿ao?9¿?¿antostrccts,notsurveymod¡fiedbycndorsemenl,ifany'theCompanydepicted.Excepttoth€ €xtentpolicyof rirlernsurance tsexpresslyorÒthermãll€fsshowhthereon.doesñottnsu¡edimensions,distances,locationofeåsem€nls,Attachment 34.9.bPacket Pg. 253Attachment: Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachments (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - ÐfilBlT A - Legal Description for Right-of-Way VacationTHAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST OUARTER OF SECTION 13,TOWNSHIP 27 NORTH, RANGE 3 EAST, W.M., MORE PARTICULARLY DËSCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:COMMENCING AT THE SOUTH EAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 13; THENCE NORTH 0O'18'06'EAST ALONG THE EAST IINE THEREOF A DISTANCE OF 37O.BO FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OFBEGINNING AND THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 1 OF CITY OF EDMONDS BOUNDARY LINEADJUSTMENT RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 199912175W7 AND CORRECTIONTHERFTO UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 2011041s0312; THENCE SOUTH 83"52'21" WEST ALONGTHE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 1 A DISTANCE OF 509.23 FEET TO THE NORHTWESTERLYCORNER OF SAID LOT 1; THENCE NORTH 06"13''13" WEST 20.00 FEFI-; THENCE NORTH83"52'21" EAST 511.52 TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 13; THENCE SOUTH00'18'06" WEST ALONG SAID EAST LINE A DISTANCE OF 20.13 FEET TO THE POINT OFBÊGINNING.SITUATE IN THE COUNWOF SNOHOMISH, STATE OFWASHINGTON.ÐECETT¿ErMAR i; 20lgr-ffi¡¡p;.Attachment 44.9.bPacket Pg. 254Attachment: Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachments (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - Resolution of Intent to Vacate) A PORTON OF rHE S-E. 1/4 OF THE S-E.. 1/4 OFsEcïoN 13, ï.27N., R-5E-, w'M.SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTONï.P-O.8.O)NOOl8'06"Es.w. coR. GoyT LoT 4sEc'noN coR. 18-27-4MONUMENT NOT FOUNDPOSIÏON ESTABUSH BYTHE PLAT OF SEAVIEWPINES NO. 2, VOL 59, PG. 170Þ.ÐÞÕ¡r]Irrr'-o\ffl(¡'u,l.J\jo-É"ON'MESCALE-1"=100'^&tr{TBT?RffiËeEjvEDTri-CountyLand Surveying Company4610 200th St. S.W. Suite ALynnwood, Wo. 98036 (425\776-2926 Fox:776-2850UNE TABLEBEARINGsoola'06"wN06'1J'13"wLENG'fH20.1320-ooLINEL1L2TO BE VACA'IEDRIGHT-OF_WAY$utt$H.g¿ú20'lg"""1ffif¡¡p 1',.Attachment 44.9.bPacket Pg. 255Attachment: Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachments (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - Resolution of Intent to Vacate) Attachment 5 4.9.b Packet Pg. 256 Attachment: Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachments (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - Resolution of Intent to Vacate) v,Ë Ëan=og þ luÊx Uz v0 2rF".2ZU<É f ñ:Éa-Z y Sa5*3:z< ¡¡ s'\I' < -J t- trl ;ir^. lO¡¿]3\Jrrì < GØrto J ÈF-:;iEL!ñ<{U ıÈ ô- à=oëÈui ËÈË Ë=Ësi ÌË3 S Ëi.P $ñF*qyØO È¡tòòì$sñu JIIAWN UAIE: oJ/12/2ots )MWN BY: LN ;HLCKLD BY: Uil INC. TERRACE, 2411J 56TH AVE W MOUNTUKE ]K(NLÇI NU, 2016-48 Î'CALE l'= 200' ïHEET NAME SITE MAP ìHEET NUMBER lofl 54 4 g-o29 UNPUTTED UNOPENED RIGHT OF WAY 5 55 3-O38 UNPIÀTTED 3-O50 UNPUTTED59 vTO *-r* ROWFROMRADIUS n*of ,*Ñ 57 56 OPEN 3-OO1 UNPIÀTTED 2 o-o99 UNPUTTED 9 3-o51\t lto 1 \3-O20 TEDVACAROW TO BE 4 SPs- l 2-81 ROW FROM !'f.l¡ ril¡¡l,tl,l'::.: I ¡-,; ¡,, I: l I i I i 1 l 1 I J II I t5¡{ j I J ! ì . i':.i:f ,ß¿4 | i.. \, t, ,. il ¡:iiìlj;iÌ I )l ') ì I ¡ Iì t ì' J,I+ ; I I \. ..i' ¡ : j i 1 1 I ¡ I lt I : I i i,.. :., it.. l:II iì iìili1 l li rlt,.i i''. I ii i r¡ ¡ ì t.i \,¡r,,' I ¡ t;".: ",i i.i,:tiil t : II I I I I ! ¡ I 1 t lt.. 1 I I I Him. Attachment 6 4.9.b Packet Pg. 257 Attachment: Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachments (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - APPRAISAL OF REAL PROPERTYReport Number A-5590TOGATED AT19511 94th PIWEdmonds, WA 98020FORDeanne Landsverk19511 94rh Pr WEdmonds, WA 98020oPliltolt oF vAtuEof Risht of Way Vacation - $10,800AS OFJune 29,2018BYJames B. Price, MAl, SRM/A, Andrew F. SorbaAppraisalGroup of the NW1409 140th St NE, Suite 105Bellevue, WA 98007425453-9292jprice@appraisalg roupnw.comappraisalgroupnw.comAttachment 74.9.bPacket Pg. 258Attachment: Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachments (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - Resolution of Intent to Vacate) BonowerFile No. A-5590Property Address 19511 94th pt WCityEdmondsCount! g¡eþe¡¡s¡State wA Zip Code 98020Lender/Client Deanne LandsverkTABTE OF GOl{TEilTSCover PaqeGP LandAdditional Comparables 4-6Supplemental Addendum ...,Subiect PhotosSubiect PhotosAddenda AAddenda BLocation MapComparable Photos 1-3Comparable Photos 4-6Ceftifications & Limiting Conditions - ResidentialAppraise/s Oualificatrons - Page 1Appraise/s 0ualifications - Page 212367II101112131415171819Attachment 74.9.bPacket Pg. 259Attachment: Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachments (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - Resolution of Intent to Vacate) Appraisal Group of the NorthWest LLP, 9 l -1 704802,(425)453'9292PRAISAL REPOFile No.:Change in Land UseX NotLikelyI Likely * f] ln Process ** To:5%2-4 UnitPresent Land Useone-Unit 70%5%Multi-UnitComm'l 10%Recreational 5%5%VacantThethistoanof: Market Value0r otherOne-Unit HousingPRICE AGE$(000) (yrs)220 Low New6 403 Hiqh 1001.200 Pred 28uqùvr ru!This reflects thevaluenolseeCunentDate is the EffectivePredominantOccupancyX OwnerE Tenant! Vacant (0-5%)! Vacant (>5%)monthHOA:OtherFeeLeaseholdLeased Fee0ther1951 IEdmondsWA98020St SW to the north. turnino south at Washinoton State Hiohwav 525 and intersectinolnterstate 5 to the east. Washinoton State Hiohwav 104 to the south. and Puoet Sound to the west.Market Area Comments: The area bounded bv 1Deanne Landsverk and Citv of Edmondslntended Use(s) (by name ortype)Client DeanneLandsverkAddress: 19s11 94th PtW, Edmonds,wA 98020Aooraiser: James B. Price. MAl. SR A/AAddress: 1409 l40th St NE Suite 105. Bellevue, WA 98007CharacteristicsLocation: IUrban XSuburban ERuralBuiltup: ffi Over75% ll25-75V, I Under2S%Growth rate: X Rapid X Sta¡te I SlowProperty values: X lncreasing E StaUe I DecliningDemand/supply: X Shortage I ln Balance I OverSupplyMarketinq time:, X Under 3 Mos. f] g-6 lt¡os. fl Over 6 Mos.ItenEmployment StabilityConvenience to EmploymentConvenience to ShoppingConvenience to SchoolsAdequacy of Public TransportationRecreational FacilitiesGoodxxxxTxAveragetrluTxnFair Poor N/At]TTTtrTTtrTTTTTTTt=lnnItenAdequacy of UtilitiesProperty CompatibilityProtection from Detrimental ConditionsPolice and Fire ProtectionGeneral Appearance of PropertiesApoeal to MarketGoodxTTxxxtrxxTtrTFairTTtrtrTTPoorunTTTTN/AnnTTTnAverageFactors Affec{in g Ma*etabilityED BLA REC AFN 1999121201104130312Assessois Parcel #:TaxYear: 2018 R.E. Tues:Assessments: $Market Area Name:ReferenceCensus Tract 0503.Cunent 0wner of Record: Deanne LandsverkBonowerProiect Type (if applicable): [l pU0 E De Minimis PUD IAre there any existing improvements to the property? E No X yes lf Yes, indicate current occupancy:X Owner I Tenant I Vacant I Nothabitableresidence with a 1 ,1 38 Sq. Ft. attachedcarnort all built in 2001. The home has three bedrooms and four bathrooms. Forino value is not imoacted bv the rioht of wav vacation: therefore the dwellinq will maintain the same valueannraiealrrñ^eêcnt.,^^^¡^¡before the riqht of wav vacation occurs and after the riqht of way isThe site is improvedoarâoe. 1.592 So.Ft. detached oaraoe. and 384Ft.a 4.132 So.Ft. AGLA 2 storv sinqle familvthe dwellof thislf Yes, give a brief description:fair markat rrah re nf lhp rinhl nf wav fn he vacafedlntended Use: Estimate theDescriotion: Section 13 Townshio 27 Ranoe 03 Quarter SE - EDMONDS SEA VIEWCITY OF ED BLA 5-9.89 REC AFN 8906200263 EXC TH PTN DAF:BEG AT SE COR OF SD PAR B THN23* 06 18W178.53FT TH N42* 18 1 1E 106.86FT TO NE COR OF SD LOTB & E LN OF SEC TH SOO* 2621W ALG SD E LN 243.25FT TOLeqalBLK OOO D-05 - PAR B OFCountv: SnohomishTÞAl1TqCopyright@ 2007 by a la mode, inc. This form may be reproduced unmodified without writtenGPLANDForm GPLND LT - "TOTAL" appraisal software by a la mode, inc. - 1-800-ALAM0DEmust312007Attachment 74.9.bPacket Pg. 260Attachment: Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachments (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - Resolution of Intent to Vacate) LANDL REPORTFile No.:Copyrìght@ 2007 by a la mode, inc. This form may be reproduced unmodified without wrìtten permission, however, a la mode, inc. nlust be acknowledgedForm GPLND LT -"T0TAL'appraisal software by a la mode, inc. - 1-800-ALAM0DEUtilitiesElectricityGasWaterSanitary SewerStorm SewerTelephoneMultimediaPublicxxxxxxStreet\/vidthSurfaceCurb/GutterSidewalkt._Corner Lotlnside LotGood0therUuateABpears Adgqnd UtilitiesFrontagePublic PrivateTopographyx¡Cul de SacOther site elementsSizeShapeDrainageViewl-0ther Provider/DescriptionlrçsllqrOtf-sitelmprovements TYPeStreet LightsSjqnifican!$loping3.28 acrerslr4th Plw-1-1234.541.5812t23t16Edmonds+1 10COMPARABLE NO. 2Snohomish/R101622175thPtW73.67mil2.81+141et Sound0007+11+Net990+50$NE-LNet2+130.06ificantFeeGoodi q .1 , 1, -0_0_,$ roo1.981Il-evelNNWMLS 6864191.13 miles NEN0. 37704 Olympic View DrwA 98026Snohomish/RS12Tr3NWMLS 861235Fee Sit16+(DESCRIPTIONNoneCOMPARABLE NO. 1DESCRIPTIONNone6.843.219.319.3X+NetNWMLS 869808Cou¡ty8eçSrdq¿lSe¡l16 XXX 76th Ave WEdmonds. WA 98026r$ 9?9,Address 19s1 1 94th Pt wnificant SlGood-Pu SoundPROPERTYnlaFeetntoViewNetmeDESCRIPTIONRecordsFEATUREwA 98020Sale PricePrice/ AcreVALUE ADJUSTMENTLocationSite AreaData Source(s)Verification Source(s)Sales or FinancingConcessionsFEMA Soec'l Flood Hazard Area r Yes X No FEMA Fl00d Zone XFEMA Map # 53061C1305EFEMA Map Date 1 1/08/1 999Site Comments: The site is deveþpedlrylllaqlnglq famrly leqidç!çq, lClached Sa@Sq, qnq privatelqedtVay- Tbe dwellinçrc¡d 4etachellevel area of the parcel, the þClê!çq Sllhq pqrcel lLaqqIS¡lIS qS¡ificallslopinq. The qite he! !ee! !!!ptoveì withmainder of the pqfcel haq lleIute tqllye gro!4h-oâraoe are built on aThe reificant landscaDo present improvements comply with existing zoning requirements? f, Yes - l\o Ll No lmprovements12Uses allowed under cunent zoning: ResidentialZoningClassification: RSDescription: l dtyellittg BCII2,000 S!.EI,Are CC&Rs applicable? I Yes [l No X Unknown Have the documents been reviewed?Comments:I Yes X No Ground Rent (if applicable) $ /The site is developed with an estate style residenceithis is the higheqt and !e9!uqe-0ther use (explain)nole Familv ResidenceHighest & Best Use as improved: X Present use, orActual Use as of Effective Date: iSummary of Highest & Best Use:Use as appraised in this reporl Vacant LqndDimensions: See Plat MSite Area:3.28 AcresooÉ,Èo.zoat,É,d=ooor¡¡(t,zot-ÈÉ,oøt¡¡c¡l¡¡tsøGDLAND312007Attachment 74.9.bPacket Pg. 261Attachment: Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachments (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - Resolution of Intent to Vacate) LAND APPRTCopyright@ 2007 by a la mode, inc. This form mayA-5590mode, inc. must be acknowledged and credited.SUPERVISORY APPRAISER (if required)E-Mail: ioricetOaooraisalorouDnw.comta¡/': 42s-4ss-974oI Did Not lnspect07to5t2019Aooraisal Grouo of the NWCompany:07to5t2018Date of Report (Signature):applicableor co-APPRAISER (ifState: WAPhone: 425-453-9292Designation:Supervisory orCo-Appraiser Name:Expiration Date of License or Certification:lnspection of Subiect N Did lnspectDate of lnspection: June 29.2018License or Certification #: 1002080Analysis of sale/transfer history and/or any cunent agreement of sale/listing:There has been no sale of the subiectl/êârcthreeneclwithin theEclmonds WA 98020Address: 19511 94th Pt W,E-Mail: deanne(@loh-inc.comClient Name: Deanne LandsverkClient Contact Deanne LandsverkName: James B. Price. MAl. SRM/AE-Mail: ioricerôaooraisalorouonw.comState: WAX Did Not lnspect (DesKop)Fal/.: 42s-4s5-974o06t13t2019Ø./^*APPRAISERPhone: 425-4sg-9292Appraiser07to5t2018Date of Report (Signature):Aooraisal Grouo of the NWCompany:MAIDesignationExpiration Date of License or Certification:lnspection of Subject f, Did tnspectDate of lnsoection: June 29.2018License or Certification #: 1100229fl This reoort is also subiect t0 other Hvoothetical Conditions and/or Extraordinary Assumptions as specified in the attached addenda.This appraisal is made X "as is", 0r I subiecttothe following conditions:Based upon an inspection of the sub¡ect property, defined Scope of Work, Statement of Assumptions and Limiting Conditions, and Appraise/s Certifications'my (ouri 0pinion öf the Market Valúe (ór ôthei specified vaiue type), as def¡ned herein, of the real property.tfa! is the--subiect.gf q!.report is: .$ - ' 1,000,000 ,asof: June 29,2018 , which is the effective date of this appraisal.If indicated above, this Ooinion of Value is subiect to Hvpothetical Conditions and/or Extraordinary Assumptions included in this repoñ. See attac[QllAdC9llla.A true and complete copy of this report contains 19 pages, including exhibits which areproperly understood without reference to the information contained in the complete report, which contains the following attached exhibits: I Scope of WorkX timiting cond./Certifications X Nanative Addendum X Location Map(s) I nooO Addendum I Additional Salesconsidered an integral part of the report. This appraisal report may not beI Hypothetical ConditionsX ParcelMaoX Photo Addendaf-l ExtraordinarvAssumotions X Aooraise/s0ualificationsMy research I did N did not reveal any prior sales or transfers of the subject property for the üree years prior to the efiective date of thisappraisalData Source(s): Countv Records. NWMLS1st Prior Subiect SaleÆransferDate: None in the previous 3 vearPriceSource(s):2nd Prior Subiect Sale/IransferDate:Price:Source(s)deweloned bêær¡se it is not a rêliâble indiætion of mârket velue: and for this tvoe of assionment. it does not produce meaninqful results. Theof a Planned Unitwh¡ch wasISTheselesbecausenotfL^fhis tvoe of Drooertv is nôt oenerâllv used for income oeneration. and the results would not bein thiswas notll. The costFinal ReconciliationDescribe common elements and recreational facilities:PROJECT INFORMATION FOR PUDsName of$lndicated Valuesize. and tooooraohv adiustments have been made based on statistical analvsis of2 3 are considered most similar to the subiect and have been oiven orimary valuation weiqht. SalesSale I isarrrentlvIS4and5fha ¡nmnafifir¡asiteisted on NWMLS 1265549 for $1.200.000. and with 464 CDOM, thelikalrr lnn hinh fnr nr rrrenl markct narticinanfsliclinn nrinphave been oiven secondarv valuationmarkel area. Sales 1indicates thelann awnacr rra limaGPLANDForm GPLND LT - "TOTAL" appraisal software by a la mode, inc. - 1-800-ALAM0DE312007Attachment 74.9.bPacket Pg. 262Attachment: Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachments (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - Resolution of Intent to Vacate) +G) $ Adiust$$$COMPARABLE NO.6$DESCRIPTIONll +il+Gì S Adiust+120.000-130 000-117.500+100.000$ -zz.soc$ r.r¿z.soo$ t tzs ooofl + X-anahamiah/trÞDÞQAveraoe-TerritorialCOMPARABLE NO.511521 N Dogwood LnWoodwav- WA 980202.18 miles SW$ zøzzza¡sNWMLS 965629Countv Records/AoentDESCRIPTIONNone10t27t16Fee SimoleWoodwav448Generallv Level+ l-) $ Adiust+30.000-255.000+100 000s -125.000875.000$$ r.ooo.ooo12t15t17Fee SimpleLake Forest Park5.6Sionificant SlooinoKino/RS9600Averaoe-Territorialfl+ XCOMPARABLE NO.419031 40th Pt NELake Forest Park- WA 981555.11 miles SE$ rzs 871 43NWMLS 114U15Countv Records/AoentDESCRIPTONNoneSUBJECT PROPERTYnla$$County RecordsDESCRIPTIONnlanlaFee SimoleEdmonds3.28Sionificant SlooinoSnohomish/RS12Good-Puqet SoundNet Adiustnent lTotal. in $)Adiusted Sale Price fin $ìSummary of Sales Comparison ApproachFEATUREAddress 19511 94th pt WEdmonds, WA 98020Proximitv to SubieclSale PricePrice/ AcreData Source(s)Verification Source(s)VALUE ADJUSTMENTSales or FinancingConcessionsDate of Sale/timeRiohts AopraisedLocationSite Area lin Acres)TooooraohvCountvZoninoViewNAL MPARABLE SALESmayFile No.:however, a la mode, inc. must be acknowledged and credited.GPLANDForm GPLND LT.(AC) -'T0TAL" appraisalsoftware by a la mode, inc. - 1-800-ALAM0DE312007Attachment 74.9.bPacket Pg. 263Attachment: Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachments (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - Resolution of Intent to Vacate) RnrrnwprPrnoertvArklress 19511 94th PIWCitvEdmondsCountv SnohomishStateWA Zio Code 98020A-5590Valuation Analysis of Road Vacationln order to estimate the value of the land and percentage of value we've utilized the "across the fence" technique, we mustfind comparable land sales to the subject and determine what rights were conveyed.Fee-Simple real estate comes with a "bundle of rights", which includes the right of possession, the right of control, the rightof exclusion, the right of enjoyment, and the right of disposition. Whenever one or more of these rights is impinged upon,the value of a piece of real estate is decreased. The traditional bundle of rights is:.Right of Possession: Very basically put, this is basic use of the property. This right can be impinged upon through thegovernment's Police power, Right of Eminent Domain, Taxation, and Escheat..Right of Control: This right allows the property owner the ability to manage the use of the property in any means deemedlegal within the jurisdiction(s) in which the property exists..Right of Exclusion: This right allows the property owner the ability to limit who or what may enter their property..Right of Enjoyment: This right asserts the property owner's right to participate in any lawful activities he finds pleasurablewhile on the property..Right of Disposition: This right allows the property owner to rent, lease, or sell, permanently or temporarily, fully orpartially, the property rights owned.The owner still retains the partial right of possession and the right of enjoyment. The right of way vacation would revert allother rights back to the subject.The proposed right of way vacation area includes the area described in Exhibits A and B, an estimated total area of 10,240sq ft (20.065'x 510.375').Based on our above land value analysis, the subject land value is estimated at $7 per square foot, when all rights areconveyed in a Fee Simple lnterest. While the subject and sales are potentially sub dividable based on zoning, this wouldnot represent the highest and best use. Therefore, we must treat the the additional land is as surplus, which is typicallyless valuable than excess land. Additionally, some rights are still held by the subject owner, it would not be appropriate tovalue the reverting land rights at 100% of value. The easement itself provides little public utility as it stands; this area hasbeen left almost entirely unused by the public since the creation of the right of way. Due to significant sloping in the right ofway vacation area, and limited utility, usability, and marketability, we estimate that the value associated with the rightsreverting to the subiect owner to be 15o/o.Right of Way Vacation Area: 10,240sqftMarket Value of Land: $7/sqftReverting Value of Land: 15%10,240sqft x $7/sqft x 15o/o = $10,800 (R)$10,800 - Estimated Value of Right of Way VacationAttachment 74.9.bPacket Pg. 264Attachment: Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachments (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - Resolution of Intent to Vacate) Subiect Photo PageBonowerProperty Address 1951 1 94th Pt WCitvEdmondsCounty SnohomishState wA Zip Code 98020Deanne LandsverkSubiect Front19511 94th Pt WSales PriceGross Living AreaTotal RoomsTotal BedroomsTotal BathroomsLocationViewSite0ualityAgeSubiect Rear$ubieet StreetAttachment 74.9.bPacket Pg. 265Attachment: Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachments (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - Resolution of Intent to Vacate) Subiect Photo PageBonowerPropertv Address 19s11 94th Pt WCrtyEdmondsCounty SnohomishState WA ZipCode 98020Lender/Client Deanne LandsverkRight of Way to be VacatedSales PriceGross Living AreaTotal Roomsïotal BedroomsTotal BathroomsLocationViewSite0ualityAgeRight of Way to be VacatedRight of Way to be VacatedAttachment 74.9.bPacket Pg. 266Attachment: Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachments (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - Resolution of Intent to Vacate) Addenda AÐfilBfT A - bgal Desaiptim for Rightd-\ryay VacationTHAT POR-TTON OF THE SOUTHEST SUARTER OF T}E SOUTHEAST OIIARTEF OF SECNON 13,TOWNSHIP 27 NOHTH. RANGE 3 EAST. W.M., MORE PAFITICULAFLY DESCRIBÊÐ A.S FOLLOWS:COMMÊNüNG AT.ÍT{E SC{.JT}I EAST CÛRNER OF SAID SECTON 13: T}IËNCË NORTI{ 0(118,06'FAST ALONG lHE EAST UNE 1TIERÊOF A DISTANCE OF 370.80 FEET TO THE TFUE POINT OFBEGINMNG AND TþlE NORTHEÀST CffiNEB OF LOT 1 OF CÍTY OF EDI,IOND€ BOUNDAFY UNEÄDJUSTMENT RECOFDED UNDER AUDÍIORS FltE NO. 190912175007 AtlD COBHECnONttEFE[O UNDEH AUDÍfORS F¡tE NO. æ1 104130312; THENCE SOUTH 8f5U21 " WEST ALONG.IHE NORTTI IJNE OF SAIÐ LOT 1 A D]STANCE OF s{XI.æ FEEÍ TO THE NORI-ITWESTERI.YCOHNER OF SAID LOT 1; 'IFIENCE NORIH 06"13'13" WEST 20.00 FEFf; TIIENCE NORTH8815â21" EAST 511 .52 TO A POINT ON THE EAST UNE OF SAID SECTON 13i .IHENCE SOUTHtr15!6- WEST ALONG SAID EAST UNE A DISÍANCE OF æ.13 FEET TO THE PO]NT OFEGINNING.STUA:TE IN lHE COUNTY OF g\¡OI-OM]SH, STATE OF WASHINGTON.Form SCNLTR - 'TOTAL" appraisal software by a la mode, inc. - 1-800-ALAM0DEAttachment 74.9.bPacket Pg. 267Attachment: Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachments (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - Resolution of Intent to Vacate) Addenda BILEtsLATIINGsÕo1a'06'wN(161-'l'13"wLLNS ¡H20.1320.00LINLL1L?"-.T"-é^ "$Y-RIGHT-OF-WAYBÊ VACAÌÊDA PORTON OF'rì-{Ë S.E. 1/4 OF THE S.E. 1/4 WsEcTroN 13. T.27N.. R.3E., W.M.SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTONT'P'O'B' NoolB'06'E370.os.w. coR. coyT LoT 4sEcnoN coR. 18-27-4MOI.IUMENT NOT FOUNDPOSÌOl.l ÊSlABUslr BY]}IE PLAÍ OF SEAVIEWPTNES NO. 2, VOL. 59. PG. 170Þ.ì-rrì{I*z\-lo-\IscALE-r"=100'.&W[RNRTri-CounLand Surveying4610 200th st. s.w.tyCompanySuite ALyrnwood, Wo. 98056 (423)776-2526 Fox:776-2850H.of\9Form SCNLTR - "T0TAL" appraisal software by a la mode, inc. - 1-800-ALAM0DEAttachment 74.9.bPacket Pg. 268Attachment: Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachments (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - Resolution of Intent to Vacate) Location MapCounty SnohomishDeanne LandsverkEdmondsState wA Zio Code 98020BonowerAddress 19s1 I 94th Pt wa ta mode, incjn#lhtlåf ûa¡ffiiëtKrtÉyfnrefcily ¡ùt¡,tu,PtsçessiDnAÀf,rC1ÊfoinrFråtri- 5ñffrtffrrth füÉ,TF.ü.ïMukilteoHarbour FointF7-tFdrlnsnt IiH Ì/ rfl{lrq -l-' -.ä¡':g=;';i: .î,TllJrh irriït,99..'ì4ù&E:tr3i1üii!Murp"ttysf+merMe¡dolr¡dalejJtlr.l! f'l3ûHl 5r,|{! Ë,, þ !,:¡þy.rt;-.;¡.'rzìì¡n¿lare qåj}sManorL¡kq Fqrest P-¿rk:?lSher¡d¿n BeadhBnercr.Erl¿qÈ:il{d'\¡f¡Kenmcire,Mcorl¡rndst¡kr Pút!r .'#Jlh t-5tir")U¡r;ñ'r't¡r¿tqËr-r{rE-q+¡{!î!o:'trnyon Ferk:?:lCreelr!r iE5*-4fo.::-+;'t'¿ì,qìÞf{enn¡rdCÕmEfBothelVfãyr,rù¿l¿lü¡n,J.ftbtfeEsperanceTle l{ighfanoså¡:.f,¡Jr,14¿,'dEt+R\. HrohlandsShoreltne " ;'td slr 5!il¿úÞr¡Ð=tt-]¿n rÌ,;'4oãqûÞg4rlParËwoad.tû{.rq *{il f[Il'+å lr;räÉs _ ..l.lmt.iü-3 Ê.äIaflEfiEczals fiFc¡o--ofi Êmpdion"sl¡gtnrtrÐL--COI|PARABLE Ho. il.16221 75$ Pl WZ"3o mlles NE16 XXX 76th Ave W1..52 miles 5ENo, I7704 olympic View Drl,13 mlles NE319031 4ûft pl NË5,1I miles SENo.419511 94th Pl W11521 N Dogwood Ln¿.r8 rn¡lËs 5WCOI,IPARABLE No".hS6r**,'r+dæi¡-¡¿'-ÊÊl.[:+rAttachment 74.9.bPacket Pg. 269Attachment: Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachments (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - Resolution of Intent to Vacate) Gomparable Photo PageBonowerAddressWCouState WACodeDeanneGomparable 116 XXX 76th Ave WProx. to Subject 1.52 miles SESale Price 920,000Gross Living AreaTotal RoomsTotal BedroomsTotal BathroomsLocation EdmondsViewSite 1.980ualrtyAgeGomparable 21622175t11PlWProx. to Subject 2.30 miles NESale Price 830,000Gross Living AreaTotal RoomsTotal BedroomsTotal BathroomsLocation EdmondsViewSite 2.810ualityAgeGomparable 37704 Olympic View DrProx. to Subiect 1.13 miles NESale Price 1,100,000Gross Living AreaTotal RoomsTotal BedroomsTotal BathroomsLocation EdmondsViewSite 4.690ualityAgeAttachment 74.9.bPacket Pg. 270Attachment: Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachments (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - Resolution of Intent to Vacate) Gomparable Photo PageBorrowerPropertv Address 1951 1 94th pt wCitvEclmondsCounty SnohomishState WA Zip Code 98020Deanne LandsverkGomparable 419031 40th Pt NEProx. to Subiect 5.1 1 miles SESale Price 1,000,000Gross Living AreaTotal RoomsTotal BedroomsTotal BathroomsLocation Lake Forest ParkViewSite 5.60ualityAgeGomparable 511521 N Dogwood LnProx. to Subiect 2.18 miles SWSale Pdce 1 ,175,000Gross Living AreaTotal RoomsTotal BedroomsTotal BathroomsLocation WoodwayViewSite 4.480ualityAgeGomparable 6Prox. to SubiectSale PdceGross Living AreaTotal RoomsTotal BedroomsTotal BathroomsLocationViewSite0ualityAge$i cr¡FAttachment 74.9.bPacket Pg. 271Attachment: Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachments (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - Resolution of Intent to Vacate) A-5590Deanne Landsverk19511 94th Pl W, Edmonds, WA 98020MARKET VALUE is defined as the most probable price which a property should bring in a competitive and open market under all conditionsrequisite to a fair sale, the buyer and seller each acting prudently and knowledgeably, and assuming the price is not affected by undue stimulus.lmplicit in this definition is the consummation of a sale as of a specified date and the passing of title from seller to buyer under conditionswhereby:1. buyer and seller are typically motivated;2. both parties are well informed or well advised and acting in what they consider their own best interests;3. a reasonable time is allowed for exposure in the open market;4. payment is made in terms of cash in U.S. dollars or in terms of financial arrangements comparable thereto; and5. the price represents the normal consideration forthe property sold unaffected by special or creative financing or sales concessions granted byanyone associated with the sale.Source: The Dictionary of Real Eslate Appraisal, 5th ed., Appraisal lnstituteThis appraisal is subjectto the following assumptions and limiting conditions:. Th¡s report is prepared using forms developed and copyrighted by the Appraisal lnstitute. However, the content, analyses, and opinions setforth in this reporl are the sole product of the appraiser. The Appraisal lnstitute is not liable for any of the content, analyses, or opinions setforth herein.. No responsibility is assumed for matters legal in character or nature. No opinion is rendered as to title, which is assumed to be good andmarketable. All existing liens, encumbrances, and assessments have been disregarded, unless otherwise noted, and the property isappraised as though free and clear, having responsible ownership and competent management.. I have examined the property described herein exclusively for the purposes of identification and description of the real property. The objectiveof our data collection is to develop an opinion of the highest and best use of the sublect property and make meaningful comparisons in thevaluation of the property. The appraiser's observations and reporting of the subject improvements are for the appraisal process and valuationpurposes only and should not be considered as a warranty of any componenl of the property. This appraisal assumes (unless otherwisespecifically stated) that the subject is structurally sound and all components are in working condition.r I will not be required to give testimony or appear in court because of having made an appraisal of the properly in question, unless specificarrangements to do so have been made in advance, or as otherwise required by law.. I have noted in this appraisal report any significant adverse conditions (such as needed repairs, depreciation, the presence of hazardouswasles, toxic substances, etc.) discovered during the data collection process in performing the appraisal. Unless otherwise stated in thisappraisal report, I have no knowledge of any hidden or unapparent physical deficiencies or adverse conditions ofthe property (such as, butnot limited to, needed repairs, deterioration, the presence of hazardous wastes, toxic substances, adverse environmenlal conditions, etc.)that would make the property less valuable, and have assumed that there are no such conditions and make no guarantees or warranties,express or implied. I will not be responsible for any such conditions that do exist or for any engineering or testing that might be required todiscover whether such conditions exist. Because I am not an expert in the field of environmental hazards, this appraisal report must not beconsidered as an environmental assessment of the property. I obtained the information, estimates, and opinions furnished by other partiesand expressed in this appraisal reportfrom reliable public and/or private sources that I believe to be true and correcl.¡ I will not disclose the contents of this appraisal report except as provided for in the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice,and/or applicable federal, state or local laws.. The Client is the party or parties who engage an appraiser (by employment contract) in a specific assignment. A party receiving a copy of thisreportfrom the client does not, as a consequence, become a party to the appraiser-client relationship. Any person who receives a copy ofthis appraisal report as a consequence of disclosure requirements that apply to an appraiser's client, does not become an intended user ofthis report unless the client specifically identified them at the time of the assignment. The appraiser's written consenl and approval must beobtained before this appraisal report can be conveyed by anyone to the public through advertising, public relations, news, sales, or othermedia.' lf this valuation conclusion is subject to satisfactory completion, repairs, or alterations, it is assumed that the improvements will becompleted compelently and without significant deviation.STATEMENT OF ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITING CONDITIONSVALUE DEFINITIONthe data, analysis or any other work product provided by the individual appraise(s).Al Reports@ Al-900.04 Certification, Assumptions and Limiting Conditions @ Appraisal lnstitute 2013, All Righls Reserved January 2013Form A19004 - "T0TAL" appraisal software by a la mode, inc. - 1-800-ALAM0DEAttachment 74.9.bPacket Pg. 272Attachment: Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachments (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - Resolution of Intent to Vacate) A-5590Client File #:AppraisalHle #:Deanne Landsverk195'11 94th Pl W, Edmonds, WA 98020ClientSubþct Property:Andrew F. SorbaØ.,/^*SR^/vADate oTtost2olqReportCO-APPRAISERAPPRAISERSignatureCertified Residential E Certified General IState WACertified Residential X Certified General EState WASignatureNameExpirationDate 06t13t2019ExpirationDate 0Tt0st201sTrainee I Licensed ELicense # 1100229Trainee X Licensed ELicense # 1002080Report Date 0710512018Name James B.' I am a Designated Member of the Appraisal lnstitute.As of the date of this report, I have completed the continuingeducation program of the Appraisal lnstitute.' I am not a Member, Candidate or Practicing Affiliate of theAppraisal lnstitute.I certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:. The statements of fact contained in this report are true and conect.r The reported analysis, opinions, and conclusions are limited only by the report assumptions and limiting conditions, and are my personal,unbiased professional analysis, opinions, and conclusions.. I have no present (unless specified below) or prospective interest in the property that is the subiect of this report, and I have no (unlessspecified below) personal interest with respect to the parties involved.. I have no bias with respect to any property that is the subject of this report or to the parties involved with this assignment.. My engagement in this assignment was not contingent upon the developing or reporting predetermined results.r My compensation for completing this assignment is not contingent upon the development or reporting of a predetermined value or directionin value that favors the cause of the client, the amount of the value opinion, the attainment of a slipulated result, or the occurrence of asubsequent event directly related to the intended use of this appraisal.. My analysis, opinions, and conclusions were developed, and this report has been prepared, in conformity with the Uniform Standards ofProfessional Appraisal Practice.r lndividuals who have provided significant real property appraisal assistance are named below. The specific tasks performed by those namedare outlined in the Scope of Work section of this report.X None tr Name(s)As previously identified in the Scope of Work section of this report, the signer(s) of this report certify to the inspection of the property that isthe subiect of this repoft as follows:Property inspected by Appraiser I Yes X NoProperty inspected by Co-Appraiser X Yes :l No. Services provided, as an appraiser or in any other capacity, regarding the propefi that is the subject of this report within the three-yearperiod immediately preceding acceptance of this assignment X None I Specify services provided:Appraisal lnstitute Designated Member, Candidate for Designation, or Practicing Affiliate Certify:. The reported analyses, opinions, and conclusions were developed, and this report has been prepared, in conformity with the requirements ofthe Code of Professional Ethics and the Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice of the Appraisal lnstitute, which include the lUniformStandards of Professional Appraisal Practice.. The use of this report is subject to the requirements of the Appraisal lnstitute relating to review by its duly authorized representatives.the data, analysis or any other work product provided by the individual appraise(s).Al Reports@ Al-900.04 Certification, Assumptions and Limiting Condilions @ Appraisal lnstitute 2013, All Rights Reserved January 2013Form 419004 -'TOTAL" appraisalsoftware by a la mode, inc. - 1-800-ALAM0DEAttachment 74.9.bPacket Pg. 273Attachment: Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachments (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - Resolution of Intent to Vacate) Appraiser's Qualifications - Page 1Qulrmc.lrrons or Arrn¡rsnnJrn'ms B. Pntct, MAf, SRYWÄwww.Af?ß rsAr,GRorip¡tw.coM ; JPRTcE(AAr"ßA¡sALGnouPhIvy.coMPtroNf, No.: (425) 4ß-9Ð2Blrr #ll0; FrxNo. 625¡ 45"ntn01409 140" Pr.tcn ITE, SrT l0s,Bu^rævur" WÀ 9E0ø-3963EDUCATIONBachelor of Science in Finance, Real Estate Ernphasis; Northem lllinois Univenity/Unive,rsity of lllinois.Appraisal Institutß cou$¡es include Capitalization fr*ty, Residential Valuation, EasementValuation, Uniform Appraisal Standa¡ds for Federal Lan<l Acquisitions, and Standardsof Professional Practice.Seminars and Classes inchrde: AI Course 833- Fundamentals of Separating Real Property,Penonal Property and Intangible Business Assets, Real Estate Feasibility, Busi¡essValuation, Valuation of Easements and Litigation Skills, and Appnaisal of PartialAcquisitions,2016.PROß.ESSIONA,L MEMBERSHIPSAppraisat InstituteIVfembership: MAI Designated Member of the Appraisal Institute since 1979Formerly: President, Dircctor, and Vice President, Seattle Chryter and AlaskaChapterInternational Right of Way AssociationDesignation: SR/WA(SeniorRightoflMayAgent)Position: International Right of Way Association Valuation Committee, pastchairFormerly: Regional Chair, Region 7, International Right of WayAssociationInternational Right of Way Association Director, President, and ViceP¡esident Seattle, Washington and Fafubanks, Alaska ChaptersEXPERIHYCE: Over 43 yearcCurrently: General Partner, Appn¡rser Gnoup oF THENoRTlrwEs-T LLPDeveloper of subdivision, office building, and reside,ncesOwner of office buildings and apartuentsFormerþ: Proprietor, Appn¡ser Gnoup or runNonï{wrsrAppraisea Schueler, McKor¡m & KeenanParfirer, Price & Associates, AlaskaSeniorAppraiser, Fint State Bank of OregonAppraiser, Pacific First Fedemal Savings BankAppraiser, U.S. Smel I Br¡siness AdministrationAppraiser, rWashington State De,pt of TransportationAppraiser, U. S. Snall Business AdministrationQUalified as an expert wilness in Superior Court, Federâl Cor¡rt Master's Hearings, andFederal Bankruptcy Court Servd as an arbitrator in property valuation and lease renewals.Washington State Deparment of Transportation approved appraiser.Fee reviewer; Washington Dept of Transportation, rnajorbanls, and governmental cliEnts.Qualified as a Master; held Master's Hearings in AlaskaArrently certified rmder the cmtinuing education program of the Appraisal Inst'ttute.Curr@tly certified in Washington State as a General Apraiser (CertificateNo. I100229)Vice President- Newcastle TrailsArryn¡rs¡,r Gnoup or nm Nonïrwr'gr LLPForm SCNLTR - "T0TAL" appraisal software by a la mode, inc. - 1 -800-ALAM0DEAttachment 74.9.bPacket Pg. 274Attachment: Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachments (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - Resolution of Intent to Vacate) Appraiser's Qualifications - Page 2çualifications of JA¡,rEs B. Prucr. u¡,1 sn/WnPage2CT.IENTS SERVEI)Abeyta & Associates, R./W CompanyBenson & Mclaughlin, AccountantsBellerue CollegeBellewe SchoolDisFictBoston Private BankBricklin Neu¡man, AtûorneysBullivant, Houser, Bailey, Pendergrass &Hoffuan;Bureau of Tndian AffairsBr¡¡eau of I¿nrl Manage,nrenfCamp KoreyCherÆon Products CompanyChr¡rch of God, Western WashingtonCity ofAuburnCity ofBelleweCityofDes MoinesCity of IssaquahCþoflCrktandCity of Maple ValleyCity ofMount VernonCityofNewcastleCity of Port AngelesCityofRedmondCity of SeaTaeCity of SeattleCþof ShorelineCity ofTacomaCityofTukwilaColumbiaBankC.ostcoEastmån, Scott, Atbmey, BellernreEl CentroDel¿RazaEnumclaw Pr¡blic SchoolsFirst Sound BankHDR EngineeringJeffenonCountyJohn Lpch, CPA, BellernreJohns Monroe Mitnrnaga, Attorneys;Michael Monroe, Da¡rell MitsunagaKeating Bucklin & McCormack,Kent SchoolDistictKeyBank of WashingtonKing CountyKing County Library SptemKittitâs CountyKorea Exchange Ba¡k (KEB)O. R. Colan Assooiates, Inc.(Acquisition Specialists)Ogden Murphy W'allace, AttorneysOpenBankOverlake HospitalPerkins Coie, LLCPlazaBankPortof FridayHa$orPortof Orc.asPort of SeattleRryet SoundEnergyReid Middleton, EngineersSaehanBankSeattle City LightSeattle School DistrictSharon Cates, AtùorneySound TransitTacoma SchoolDistictTacoma UtilitiesUrnpquaBankU.S. BankU.S. Fidetity & GuaranteeU.S. Postal SenriceUniBankUnionBankUniversal Field SsvioesWashington Federal BankWashington Dept. of Transportation-Approved Appraiser & ReviswerWashington State Dept. ofNaturalResourcesWashington State Parks & RecreationC.ornmissionWasteManage, entWilliams Northwest PipelineWïlshire BankArpn¡rs¡r, Gnow or mr Nonn¡wrgr LLPForm SCNLTR - "T0TAL" appraisal software by a la mode, inc. - 1 -800-ALAM0DEAttachment 74.9.bPacket Pg. 275Attachment: Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachments (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - Resolution of Intent to Vacate) Go-Appraiser's QualificationsQualifications of AppraiserAndrew F. Sorbaw$w-Appn tIsAtGRonPNW.coM ; AsonnA@fl¡rya¡¡¡5¡lGnoupNlt¡.couPnoxr No.: 425-453-9292 x128; Flx rrto.: 425-455-97401409 140il Pr.¡,cs NE, Sunr 105, Bru¡wE, WA 98007-3693EducationBachelor of Arts - Double Major in Political Science & Laws, Societies,and Justice; Universþ of Washingtonkofessional DesþnationsLicensed RealEstaæ Appraiser Trainee, State of Vlashington;Certificate No. 1002080Appraisal CoursesGeneral Appraiser Income Approach Part I - Appraisal InstituteGeneral Appraiser Site Valuation & Cost Approach - Appraisal InstitutsBasic Appraisal Principles - App.aisal InstituteBasic Appraisal Prccedures - Appraisal lnstitr¡teUSPAP 2016-n17 - Appraisal Instiû¡tßT'.qlerience2017-Present Appraiser, Appraisal Group of the Northwest, LLPClients Served:Elliot & Corryany Appraiserstlargiss Properties, LLCHDR,IncKent School DisfictLasher Holzapfel Sperry & EbbersonLaw Ofñces of Beth A. McDaniel, PLLCPerkins Coie, LLPPierce CountySchweet Linde & Coulson" PLLCForm SCNLTR - "T0TAL" appraisal software by a la mode, inc. - 1-800-ALAM0DEAttachment 74.9.bPacket Pg. 276Attachment: Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachments (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - Resolution of Intent to Vacate) Attachment 8 4.9.b Packet Pg. 277 Attachment: Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachments (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - 13141912819303 9022 20021 20020 1 9 3 0 0 110510291001 20031 19128 1305 193058920 19324 1112194131324 910123519218 9116 1123 89001912019105 88181416 920 1231 1121 1241871219232 1122 20106 19722950019428 1011 931 4 1007 834 19902 19900 12139511 20018 871019111 19204 199058912 1981720029 9109 888987061961519711132719243 12161306 1224 19817 19226 90099706 19230 19311 20028 192219118 1205104119105 1025 19327 9035 88201021 19210 9220 12301118 862919308 921 1410 892019624926 20103 1015 1011 19517194051312 19801 101490008909 1911519115 192111026953119903 1303 1214 19200 19532 19309 19225 1121 1992719619 1323 123410321304 19515 131214399010 192269630 1010 193 1 6 19227 19314 153 0 19102 8826821 19213 19409 8908 1020 197039049 1108 11161225 820 197158907 19305151 5 19516 915 903155119117 9007 1430 880211038918880619805 19730 8911 93019209 19918 19928192289507 19522 19128 19524 9106110710311206 141 7 1930519306 8726 2002119215 1004 1428 1400 922 5 112012251152 19214 19905 9029420757 8718120019125 1992519312 8715891519226 1922519129 1139 1412 197141450 870419501 1201199141225 911191231141 200098909 1991214289513 88201972119918 911 19130 198242002319220 144 9 93151932 3 200301204115419222192311040 198159007 1230 19115 19219 9108 19124 1031 100619911 19401 1012 20017 102793028710 19919 19230 11201920819229 19205 14418902194011318 1309 931 890219702 19822932 9121198188721124619315 19910 197 1 0 112519105 1111 140514071409 19412 19915 1403 19210 19911 194208815131619705 124511011028102711121016 111620024 929 193031911419106 19411 920 199181114 91198932 19212 1217 9110 891119308110419301830 835918 1420 1251201041942695108812 19402 928 1008 1055 11101103 871519830 19726 19210 19904871419309 9509 1432195081009 2000219226 1971319106 1218 1931019248 1561 199281313 19311 200198820927 19102 19222 1930190551115 10101215151 2 19225 8917 11161140 19906 19804 8629193101439870419125 19228 1126 836 8925901 19509 19810 200299241440 19409131519811 1011 892811359515 9125 89198907 8720 19127 142 4 9525150 5 19727 19829 1992219211 8201923520026 19623 1313 1923119317 19520 9303 19129 1312 19109 9199608 9011 961019223 110219407 8940 10251008 870420019 8718 87111542 19110 1125 88141231913 19121 19115 8915 1305 9212892411009005 1109 1109 930 8927 19910 19902 1136 198131220200258840910219925824 1450 19917 19518 11191117 10051025 2003119228 1047 9129THESE LOTS ADDRESSED OFF 192NDPARKING MAPLEWOODHILL PARK 8705PUDSUB STATIONROCK & GEMCLUB87128904 19507 8717 9016 1132 828 826 8719 19511 8710PUGET D R VIEWLAND WAY 191ST PL SW MAPLEWOOD DR194TH ST SW 192ND ST SW92ND AVE WVIEWLAND WAYOLYMPICAVE12THAVEN 88TH AVE WMAPLEWOODDROLYMPICVIEW DR200TH ST SW VISTA WAYOLYMPIC AVEP U G ET DR91ST AVE W11TH PL N12THAVEN88TH AVE W196TH ST SW 89TH AVE W12TH PL N88TH AVE W89TH PL W192ND PLSW94THAVEW 93RD PL WVISTA WAY VISTA PL EUCLID AVE 89TH PL W89TH PLWFOREST DELL DR 192ND ST S W EXCELSIOR PL 94THPLWSR 524 SR524 H Vacation Request Zoning and Vicinity MapExcelsior Place Street VacationPLN20180021 1 inch = 400 feet Scale Attachment 9 4.9.b Packet Pg. 278 Attachment: Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachments (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - Attachment 10 4.9.b Packet Pg. 279 Attachment: Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachments (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - Sign Posting Locations (Excelsior Place) East end of the indicated area on the easement Middle area of the indicated area on the easement West end of the indicated area on the easement Attachment 10 4.9.b Packet Pg. 280 Attachment: Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachments (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - Attachment 10 4.9.b Packet Pg. 281 Attachment: Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachments (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - Attachment 10 4.9.b Packet Pg. 282 Attachment: Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachments (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - Attachment 10 4.9.b Packet Pg. 283 Attachment: Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachments (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - Attachment 10 4.9.b Packet Pg. 284 Attachment: Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachments (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - Attachment 10 4.9.b Packet Pg. 285 Attachment: Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachments (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - CITY OF EDMONDS – PLANNING DIVISION STAFF COMMENT FORM  PW-Engineering  Fire  PW - Maintenance  Building Project Number: Applicant’s Name: Property Location: Date Application Received: Date Application Routed: Zoning: Project Description: If you have any questions or need clarification on this project, please contact: Responsible Staff: Ext. Name of Individual Submitting Comments: Title: Date:  I have reviewed this land use proposal for my department and I do not have any comments. My department may also review this project during the building permit process (if applicable) and reserves the right to provide additional comments at that time.  I have reviewed this land use proposal for my department and have the following comments or conditions: Attachment 11 4.9.b Packet Pg. 286 Attachment: Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachments (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - Updated: Jan 2018 NOTE: Detailed plans must be submitted, and approved, prior to painting any new fire lane or modifying any existing fire lane. Fire Lanes must: 1) Be a minimum unobstructed width of 20 feet and minimum unobstructed vertical clearance of 13 feet, 6 inches. *Fire lanes shall be a minimum of 26 feet wide in the immediate vicinity of any building over 30 feet in height above grade. Such fire lanes shall be located a minimum of 15 feet and a maximum of 25 feet from the building. 2) Provide Fire Department access to within 150 feet of any portion of an un-sprinkled building. In buildings that provided with an automatic sprinkler, access may be increased, at the discretion of the Fire Marshal. 3) Provide Fire Department access to all on-site fire hydrants and fire department connections (FDC) for sprinkler and standpipe. A hydrant must be located to within 25’ of a fire department connection. 4) Have adequate turning radius to allow maneuvering of fire apparatus: inside radius 25 feet; outside radius 45 feet. 5) Be circulating or have an approved turn-around if over 150 feet long. Have grades of no more than 12%. 6) Be paved with asphalt or approved equivalent and be capable of supporting the imposed loads of fire apparatus. 7) Be marked with words “FIRE LANE – NO PARKING.” Words to be painted on the pavement inside the lane. Letters to be a minimum of 12” high, 2” stroke, yellow in color, and alternately spaced every 50 feet. 8) Have perimeter striping/curbing to delineate the boundaries of the Fire Lane. Striping to be a minimum of 4 inches wide and striping/curbing to be yellow in color. 9) When required by the Fire Marshal, signs shall be used in addition to or in lieu of striping. Signs, when approved, shall meet the following requirements: a) Size: 18” high x 12” wide (min.) b) Mounting: Bottom of sign 48” to 60” above grade. c) Style: Industry standard (Vulcan %7-6-9, Rainbow 01-527, EMED TC 18816 or approved equivalent). d) Color: Red lettering on white background e) Spacing: 50’ between signs or as required by Fire Marshal. 10) Fire lanes shall be established by these requirements to provide access to buildings during construction, alteration or demolition. Fire Code Supplemental Rules and Regulations are designated interpretations of the adopted International Fire Code, Edmonds Community Development Code and national standards allowed by IFC 102.7,102.8 and 102.9 and ECDC 19.25 which provide specifics and details to aid in conformance with the intent of the governing laws, statutes, ordinances and fire- and life safety-related requirements. FIRE LANE STANDARDS Attachment 11 4.9.b Packet Pg. 287 Attachment: Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachments (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - City of Edmonds Date: September 27, 2018 To: Kernen Lien, Environmental Programs Manager From: Jeanie McConnell, Engineering Program Manager Subject: PLN20180021 – Street Vacation: A Portion of Excelsior Place Landsverk – 19511 94th Pl W The Engineering and Maintenance & Operations Divisions of Public Works have reviewed the subject application and recommend approval of the proposed Excelsior Place street vacation. The proposal was found to meet the street vacation criteria established in Edmonds Community Development Code 20.70.020 as it relates to transportation and utility systems. 1) Traffic flow and sight distance concerns were reviewed in consideration of the subject Excelsior Place street vacation. That portion of Excelsior Place right-of-way subject this street vacation, is connected to other sections of City right-of-way (Puget Drive to the west and 196th St SW to the east) through private roadways. The currently accessible public portions of Excelsior Place right-of-way are highlighted in the map below. That portion of Excelsior Place right-of-way adjacent to 19515 and 19511 does not directly connect to Puget Drive or 196th St SW right-of-ways. MEMORANDUM Attachment 12 4.9.b Packet Pg. 288 Attachment: Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachments (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - A couple residents off 94th Pl W (the western extents of Excelsior Place) have informed the City of their historical use of the private roads on the eastern extents of the proposed vacation, however, the information submitted to the City as part of the street vacation indicates only certain properties have easements of record. Please refer to Attachment 15 of the staff report. The applicant provided additional information to the City on September 25th further purporting the properties on the west side of Excelsior Place do not have access through the private access road on the east side of Excelsior Place. Photos were provided showing “private driveway” signage (Attachment 21). The applicant also stated “over the past 18 years we continually have stopped traffic trying to pass through on these driveways. We have spoken to ALL the property owners on the west end and they are all aware that there is no legal access through our driveway or across the driveways to the east” (Attachment 17). While some of the residents have stated they have historically used these private driveways, it appears as though this has not been a permissible action by the owners of the property in which the driveway is located. In addition to traffic flow, the City received comments regarding sight distance concerns at the intersection of 94th Pl W and Puget Drive. The City Transportation Engineer reviewed sight distance at this intersection and determined that it does not comply with standards. To meet sight distance standards, a motorist exiting 94th Pl W onto Puget Drive should have clear sight lines to the east for a distance of 300-ft. This lineal footage is based upon the speed posted on the road, which is 30mph. The current sight distance is 200-ft, which falls 100-ft short of being in compliance. However, this has been a long standing issue that was specifically identified during review of a short plat (S-12-81) in 1982. The engineering requirements established by the City Engineer at the time, Jim Adams, restricted the turning movement onto 196th to a right turn only (Attachment 22). It has been confirmed that signage currently exists along Puget Drive (196th) and at the intersection of 94th Pl W to restrict traffic movements to right-in and right-out (Attachment 23). With this analysis, it has been determined that the street vacation has little to no effect on the existing traffic flow and sight distance conditions. 2) In addition to the transportation considerations, the City currently owns and maintains a sanitary sewer main and water main, including a fire hydrant through the subject vacation area. Attachment 12 4.9.b Packet Pg. 289 Attachment: Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachments (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - Operation and maintenance of utilities is more efficient when utilities are located within a public right-of-way versus a private easement. This is found to be true as decisions regarding the use of the right-of-way remains with the public and access to the utility systems is not restricted by a private property owner. In this particular case, the existing water and sewer mains are located mostly within the existing paved driveway area, which helps to prevent the overgrowth of vegetation and backyard improvements that tend to be the most burdensome in maintaining utility systems located within easements. In addition, the applicant has offered to provide a public safety and utility easement turn-around as a condition of the subject street vacation (Attachment XX Landsverk email). The turn-around area would be seen as a public benefit as it would improve existing access conditions and provide an unobstructed area for public safety and utility maintenance & operations vehicles to maneuver within the limited space. When City utilities exist within an area to be vacated, staff considers whether the utility systems should remain public or become private should the street vacation be approved. In this particular case, it would be appropriate for City to continue to own and maintain the utility systems for the following reasons: a. The subject street vacation abuts 19511 94th Pl W and within the boundaries of these limits, there is not a clear point in the utility systems to distinguish between public and private ownership. In finding a point at which this clear distinction could be made, public utilities would either fall within private property or private utilities would fall within public right-of-way. b. If the water main were to become private, the water meters would need to be re-located to fall within City right-of-way and new water service lines would Attachment 12 4.9.b Packet Pg. 290 Attachment: Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachments (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - need to be run to the individual properties. This would create long runs of water service line, which could create long term maintenance issues. c. With the relocation of the water meters, the private water main and fire hydrant would essentially serve as a private fire line. The change from a public water main to a private fire line would spur the requirement for the property owners to install a backflow assembly in a vault in order to provide water quality protection between the public water system and the private fire line. d. The sewer main could provide sewer service to other properties in the area should those lots be developed in the future. Thank you. Attachment 12 4.9.b Packet Pg. 291 Attachment: Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachments (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - Attachment 134.9.bPacket Pg. 292Attachment: Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachments (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - Resolution of Intent to Vacate) Attachment 13 4.9.b Packet Pg. 293 Attachment: Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachments (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - Resolution of Intent to Vacate) Attachment 14 4.9.b Packet Pg. 294 Attachment: Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachments (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - Resolution of Intent to Vacate) Attachment 14 4.9.b Packet Pg. 295 Attachment: Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachments (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - Resolution of Intent to Vacate) Attachment 14 4.9.b Packet Pg. 296 Attachment: Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachments (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - Resolution of Intent to Vacate) Attachment 14 4.9.b Packet Pg. 297 Attachment: Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachments (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - Resolution of Intent to Vacate) Attachment 14 4.9.b Packet Pg. 298 Attachment: Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachments (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - Resolution of Intent to Vacate) Attachment 14 4.9.b Packet Pg. 299 Attachment: Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachments (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - Resolution of Intent to Vacate) CURRENTLYIMPROVED ROADTHIS AREA TOO STEEP FORFUTURE IMPROVEMENTUNIMPROVED RIGHT OFWAY TO BE VACATEDTHIS PROPERTY AS ACCESSRIGHTS TO BOTH THE BLUE &READ ACCESS ROADSAttachment 154.9.bPacket Pg. 300Attachment: Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachments Attachment 16 4.9.b Packet Pg. 301 Attachment: Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachments (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - Attachment 16 4.9.b Packet Pg. 302 Attachment: Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachments (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - Attachment 16 4.9.b Packet Pg. 303 Attachment: Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachments (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - Attachment 16 4.9.b Packet Pg. 304 Attachment: Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachments (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - Attachment 16 4.9.b Packet Pg. 305 Attachment: Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachments (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - Attachment 16 4.9.b Packet Pg. 306 Attachment: Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachments (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - Attachment 16 4.9.b Packet Pg. 307 Attachment: Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachments (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - Attachment 16 4.9.b Packet Pg. 308 Attachment: Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachments (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - Attachment 16 4.9.b Packet Pg. 309 Attachment: Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachments (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - Attachment 16 4.9.b Packet Pg. 310 Attachment: Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachments (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - Attachment 16 4.9.b Packet Pg. 311 Attachment: Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachments (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - Attachment 16 4.9.b Packet Pg. 312 Attachment: Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachments (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - Attachment 16 4.9.b Packet Pg. 313 Attachment: Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachments (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - Attachment 16 4.9.b Packet Pg. 314 Attachment: Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachments (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - Attachment 16 4.9.b Packet Pg. 315 Attachment: Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachments (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - Attachment 16 4.9.b Packet Pg. 316 Attachment: Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachments (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - Attachment 16 4.9.b Packet Pg. 317 Attachment: Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachments (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - From:Deanne Landsverk To:Lien, Kernen; Duane Landsverk; lee.michaelis@pugetsoundplanning.com Cc:Williams, Phil; English, Robert; Hope, Shane; McConnell, Jeanie Subject:RE: Public Hearing Continuation Date:Tuesday, September 25, 2018 11:42:30 AM Attachments:180925 dml Attachment #1.pdf180925 dml Attachment #2.pdf180925 dml Attachment #3.pdf180925 dml Attachment #4.pdf180925 dml Attachment #5.pdf180925 dml Attachment #6.pdf Good Morning Everyone – Thank you for taking the time to meet with us yesterday to discuss our concerns with the Staff recommendation to Council to deny the request to vacate a portion of Excelsior Place. The first concern is the premise that there is a prescriptive easement for the properties to the west of 19511 to traverse over 5 properties for safer access out to 196th from their homes. In your report and recommendation to City Council you state the following “Considering this potential safety issue, it would be in the best interest of the public to maintain the Excelsior Place right-of-way, which would in turn allow traffic flow to continue through the private access roads and public right-of-way as it historically has. “the street vacation could place access restrictions on the properties along the western extents of the Excelsior Place street vacation. “ These statements are both incorrect and misleading. There are no access rights for any properties to the west for access across any of the properties to the east for access to 196th – prescriptive or otherwise. A Private Driveway sign (Photo #1) is clearly posted at the west end of the property at 19511. There is also a Private Driveway sign (Photo #2) at the east end of these private driveways as well. ALL properties owners on the west end have been informed that there is no access out to 196th via these private driveways. Over the past 18 years we continually have stopped traffic trying to pass through on these driveways. We have spoken to ALL the property owners on the west end and they are all aware that there is no legal access through our driveway or across the driveways to the east. We are not home 24/7 and we prefer not to have to gate our property so cars do on occasion pass through, however, it is clearly signed that this is a Private Driveway. Please also see attachments #1-3 where the original owners of these west side properties wrote letters to the City of Edmonds in 1984 regarding their concerns with their access from 94th to 196th. This street vacation will not change any of the existing conditions as it relates to ingress and egress for those properties. Attachment #4 is the City Engineer’s response to their concerns. This site distance issue has been a concern of all property owners for over 30+years and we would like to see the City put this on their CIP list for future consideration. Even if this portion of Excelsior Place were to be Attachment 17 4.9.b Packet Pg. 318 Attachment: Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachments (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - improved (which it currently is a 20’ unopened right of way), there would be no public access to it, one would have to Trespass over private property in order to get to it. In addition, this portion of Excelsior could not be improved to meet current road standards as it is only 20’ wide. The only public written response to our vacation request was from John Vicklund. If the City were so inclined to request it, I would be happy to provide you with a novel of paperwork documenting our interactions with Mr. & Mrs. Vicklund since 1999. I am including Attachment #5 which is a restraining order we were forced to get against the Vicklunds when we were building our home in 2000. They were extremely opposed to us building our home and fought us at every turn in the application process. Things got to the point where Mrs. Vicklund physically assaulted Duane and was charged and found guilty of that assault. We formally notified Mr. & Mrs. Vicklund through their attorney that their presence on any portion of our property would be considered trespassing (see Attachment #6). Nothing to that end has changed over the past 19 years. Mr. Vicklund would like you to believe that the building of our home and legally removing trees created the situation at the juncture of 196th and 94th when the documents provided herein clearly illustrate that this situation existed long before we bought our property. Mr. Vicklund continues with his lies when stating that he and the neighbors use Excelsior Place to go east. Again I refer you to Attachmet #5. Excelsior Place is an unopened Right of Way at this point, so there is no way that he or the others legally use this road to go east. If they use our driveway to go east, they are in fact knowingly trespassing and for the City to deny the vacation request on this premise, is in fact encouraging this illegal activity. Regarding the 2nd concern of the street vacation, the utilities. As discussed, in order provide a greater public benefit, we would agree to place the utilities that are now legally inaccessible to City maintenance vehicles to maintain said utilities into an easement with a proper turn around as a condition of the vacation. This would resolve several outstanding issues with the current conditions with the utilities. The other issue that should be given greater weight in this matter is the public benefit of protecting critical areas. There are 11+ acres owned by us along with A.P. Van Meter. On these 11+acres there are significant challenges. This vacation will allow for us to address these challenges with a BLA that will significantly reduce the impact on critical areas that include steep slopes, wetlands and a stream. Again thank you for your time and we look forward to moving this process forward in a manner that benefits us all. Regards, Duane Landsverk Attachment 17 4.9.b Packet Pg. 319 Attachment: Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachments (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - From: Lien, Kernen [mailto:Kernen.Lien@edmondswa.gov] Sent: Monday, September 24, 2018 4:54 PM To: Duane Landsverk <duane@lqh-inc.com>; Deanne Landsverk <deanne@lqh-inc.com>; lee.michaelis@pugetsoundplanning.com Cc: Williams, Phil <Phil.WIlliams@edmondswa.gov>; English, Robert <Robert.English@edmondswa.gov>; Hope, Shane <Shane.Hope@edmondswa.gov>; McConnell, Jeanie <Jeanie.McConnell@edmondswa.gov> Subject: Public Hearing Continuation Duane et. al, Based on the additional information discussed today, staff will request a continuation of the public hearing. Please follow up in writing with details related to access, turn-around, etc. In order to prepare for the hearing on October 2nd, the information would need to be received by noon on Wednesday September 26th. Please let us know if you have any questions. Kernen Lien | Environmental Programs Manager City of Edmonds – Planning Division 425-771-0220 Attachment 17 4.9.b Packet Pg. 320 Attachment: Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachments (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - Attachment 18 4.9.b Packet Pg. 321 Attachment: Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachments (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - Attachment 18 4.9.b Packet Pg. 322 Attachment: Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachments (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - Attachment 18 4.9.b Packet Pg. 323 Attachment: Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachments (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - Attachment 19 4.9.b Packet Pg. 324 Attachment: Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachments (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - Attachment 20 4.9.b Packet Pg. 325 Attachment: Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachments (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - Attachment 20 4.9.b Packet Pg. 326 Attachment: Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachments (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - Attachment 20 4.9.b Packet Pg. 327 Attachment: Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachments (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - Attachment 20 4.9.b Packet Pg. 328 Attachment: Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachments (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - Attachment 20 4.9.b Packet Pg. 329 Attachment: Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachments (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - Attachment 20 4.9.b Packet Pg. 330 Attachment: Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachments (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - Attachment 20 4.9.b Packet Pg. 331 Attachment: Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachments (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - Attachment 21 4.9.b Packet Pg. 332 Attachment: Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachment 22 4.9.b Packet Pg. 333 Attachment: Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachments (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - Attachment 22 4.9.b Packet Pg. 334 Attachment: Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachments (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - “No Left Turn” sign placed in the East Bound direction on Puget Drive to prevent vehicles from turning left onto 94th Pl W. “Right Turn Only” sign placed at the intersection of 94th Pl W and Puget Drive to prevent left hand turns onto Puget Drive. Attachment 23 4.9.b Packet Pg. 335 Attachment: Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachments (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - “Hidden Driveway Ahead” signage placed in the West Bound direction on Puget Drive to give drivers advanced warning of the driveway access at 94th Pl W and Puget Drive. Attachment 23 4.9.b Packet Pg. 336 Attachment: Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachments (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - 1 Lien, Kernen From:John Vicklund <johnvicklund@hotmail.com> Sent:Friday, September 21, 2018 1:46 PM To:Lien, Kernen Cc:Earling, Dave; Shirley Vicklund Subject:Vacation of a portion of Excelsior Place Dear Kernen Lien and the Edmonds City Council, As we are unable to attend the Council meeting on September on September 25th, we are writing our concerns of access and safety regarding this matter. Currently, the neighbors use Excelsior Place to go East up the hill. This is a necessary exit to 94th Place West because of increased traffic on SR524(Puget Drive) and the blind corner as we enter SR524. When the retaining rockery was put in many years ago, the neighbors could see clearly up the hill at the stop sign on 94th Place and Puget Drive. In 1999 Duane Landsverk and his logging crew cut down over a hundred trees in this environmentally sensitive area. The result is that the hillside has pushed the rockery out over four feet towards the road and many trees are falling over in the area. This destruction over the years has cause an extremely dangerous blind corner for traffic coming down Puget drive and cars leaving 94th Place West. Tuning left up Puget drive is an extreme hazard. We oppose the plan to remove Excelsior Place as a city street that is open to the neighborhood. We recommend that the Council reject this proposal to turn it into private property and thus eliminating a safe exit to 194th Place West. Enclosed find a copy of the restrictions on Lot of the sub division by Lois Vinyard in 1984. Line 6 of filing 8408290222 clearly gives the City of Edmonds authority to deny any more houses or traffic on the difficult ingress and egress of 94th Place West. Thank you for consideration of the safety of our neighborhood. Please visit our driveway and the difficult entry onto Puget Drive before you make any decisions on removing Excelsior Place from our citizens safe use. Sincerely, Shirley and John Vicklund John H. Vicklund 19515 94th Pl. W. Edmonds, WA 98020 johnvicklund@hotmail.com Cell: 425‐754‐3054 Attachment 24 4.9.b Packet Pg. 337 Attachment: Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachments (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - Attachment 25 4.9.b Packet Pg. 338 Attachment: Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachments (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - Attachment 25 4.9.b Packet Pg. 339 Attachment: Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachments (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - 1 Lien, Kernen From:Ken Reidy <kenreidy@hotmail.com> Sent:Tuesday, September 25, 2018 12:44 PM To:Nelson, Michael; Buckshnis, Diane; Monillas, Adrienne; Mesaros, Thomas; Johnson, Kristiana; Tibbott, Neil; Teitzel, Dave; Lien, Kernen Cc:Taraday, Jeff; Earling, Dave Subject:Public comments for tonight's public hearing Agenda Item 6.1 To All, As I stated during a street vacation public hearing on November 1, 2016, requiring an appraisal with a street vacation application seems premature. Per the Supreme Court, the authority to require compensation is permissive which means such is allowed but it is not the Council’s obligation to require compensation for a street vacation. As such, why should an applicant have to acquire and pay for an appraisal with the application prior to City Council’s discussion on whether to grant the petition and/or require compensation? I think the City should consider reimbursing the applicants for the cost of the appraisal. Before City Council votes on Agenda Item 6.1 this evening, please consider this a formal request for City Staff to provide City Council and all citizens of Edmonds answers to the following questions: What State Law allows the City Council to approve a street vacation subject to the applicant assuming ownership of public utility infrastructure located in the public right‐of‐way? What State Law allows the City Council to transfer public utility repair and maintenance responsibilities to a private party as part of a street vacation legislative process? Again, please answer all the above questions before City Council votes on Agenda Item 6.1. Please provide the specific RCW or case law that allows the City Council to do what City staff lists as option b). Thank You, Ken Reidy Attachment 26 4.9.b Packet Pg. 340 Attachment: Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachments (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - Attachment 274.9.bPacket Pg. 341Attachment: Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachments (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - Resolution of Intent to Vacate) Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes September 25, 2018 Page 2 Doug Swartz, Edmonds, referred to Housing Task Force, a task force with members hand-picked by the Mayor, and found it appalling that many of the members do not live in or have a connection to Edmonds and a majority are in the homelessness business or building business. He challenged the task force to provide examples where input from the public changed anything in the document, noting most of the project was done out of the public’s sight. Passage of the Housing Strategy will fundamentally and permanently change Edmonds. The zoning changes that will quickly be passed after the approval of the Strategy will present a field day for developers with the development of taller buildings and buildings with insufficient parking. At its core, the document is focused on removing regulations that have made Edmonds what it is and have kept developers responsible. These are the same tactics that have been repeatedly tried and failed in San Francisco, Portland and Seattle. He quoted the head of the Portland Police Union, “homelessness has turned Portland into a cesspool.” The San Francisco Chronicle reported the San Francisco tourism industry struggles to explain the street misery that horrified visitors see. Examples of Seattle’s failed efforts regarding the homeless are readily apparent in the local news. He requested the City Council form a new group of regular citizens, for and against the current document, to discuss in an open forum whether the current draft Housing Strategy is what citizens want. He requested the Council commit to taking no action on this document until they obtain citizen feedback. Even if Councilmembers agree with the draft document, it is their responsibility to listen to the arguments of their constituents. 6. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. PUBLIC HEARING FOR EXCELSIOR PLACE STREET VACATION Environmental Program Manager Kernen Lien explained additional information was received after staff prepared the agenda memo and recommendation. Therefore, staff requests that following public comment, the hearing be continued until next Tuesday. He reviewed: • Initiation of proceedings: o ECDC 20.70.050.B – Petition of owners of more than two-thirds of property abutting the portion of street or alley to be vacated o Resolution No. 1417 set public hearing for tonight • Map identifying vacation request area • Right-of-way established via 20’ right-of-way in the Edmonds Seaview tract in 1906 and has not been brought u to City standards since 1906 • ECDC 20.70.020 – Criteria for Vacation o The vacation is in the public interest o No property will be denied direct access as a result of the vacation • Vacation request an outgrowth of a lot line adjustment application the City received o One of proposed lots, Parcel A spanned the Excelsior Place right-of-way and City could not approve a lot that straddles a right-of-way o Applicants given options  Amend lot line adjustment so no parcels straddle the right-of-way or  Apply for a street vacation o Five existing lots of record  Public benefit of vacation - Allows lot line adjustment to proceed and minimizes potential impacts to critical areas - City no longer have responsibility and liability associated with right-of-way • Issues staff considered o Traffic Flow  Excelsior Place right-of-way improved in two places - Area between improved areas is steep so Excelsior Place unlikely to be extended - City received comment that some residents use improved area and private road to access 196th St SW Attachment 28 4.9.b Packet Pg. 342 Attachment: Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachments (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes September 25, 2018 Page 3 o Sight Distance  Required sight distance to turn left from 94th Place W onto Puget Drive is 300 feet; actual sight distance is 200 feet • Aerial map of access based on Easements of Record o Properties that have rights to use 94th Place W o Private drive that connects 196th to improved area of Excelsior Place o Properties that has legal rights to use both In its previous recommendation, staff considered whether residents who have historically used the private road have prescriptive rights to continue. Staff received additional information since the staff report was prepared regarding how the area is signed and communications over the years. He displayed: • View into the right-of-way proposed to be vacated from the west and east • Photograph of private drive signs on the west and east • Applicants provided correspondence with residents on the west informing them this is not a public road and indicating on occasion they have stopped people driving on the private road • Staff plans to further research the turn from 94th Place W to Puget Drive o When some of the lots were platted in 1984, the City conditioned the plat to be right turn in/out from 94th Place W - Some striping remains hinting at right in/out - Drivers currently make left turns in/out • Utilities o Water and sewer mains exist in the right-of-way, installed by the applicant who is requesting the street vacation o Options  City maintain ownership and require utility easement  Applicant assume ownership of water and sewer mains - City typically relinquishes ownership at manhole; existing manholes result in private utility within the public right-of-way - Water meters would need to be moved back to the public right-of-way and separate water lines installed o Applicant proposed to give the City a utility easement and provide a turnaround for City and emergency vehicles • ECDC 20.70.140 Final Decision o Following the public hearing, the City Council shall 1. Adopt an ordinance granted the vacation; or 1. Adopt an ordinance granted the vacation; or 2. Adopt a motion denying the vacation; or 3. Adopt a resolution of intent were specific conditions must be met within 90 days a. Either i. Monetary compensation up to one-half fair market value ii. Grant of substitute public right-of-way iii. Any combination of a.i or a.ii Or b. Grant of an easement to the City in exchange for easement vacated Mr. Lien explained monetary compensation cannot be required if the City receives a utility easement. The appraised value of the right-of-way is $10,500; per City Code, if monetary compensation could be accepted, it would be half the appraised value or approximately $5,000. Attachment 28 4.9.b Packet Pg. 343 Attachment: Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachments (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes September 25, 2018 Page 4 Staff’s previous recommendation was to deny the vacation; given the additional information received since the staff report was issued, staff requests the City Council continue the public hearing to October 2 to allow staff time to consider the new information, conduct further research and reconsider its recommendation. Councilmember Tibbott referred to the map identifying the critical areas and asked if the stream is open or in a culvert. Mr. Lien answered it is open to the middle of the wetland area. Councilmember Teitzel said he drove to the site yesterday and looked at 94th Place West. As he exited south, he noticed a right turn only sign in addition to the yellow marking. He asked if drivers turning left were breaking the law. Mr. Lien answered staff will research that. Applicant Duane Landsverk, agreed 94th Place W was signed no left turn but most officers have been fairly lenient when issues have occurred there over the years as the sign has been missing at times, etc. Even prior to 1984, that intersection was difficult. That condition will not change for the existing lots that use that intersection. He was confused with staff’s concern with that situation when new lots were not being created. The lots exist; their goal is to create a better situation and avoid building on a critical slope, in a wetland or next to a stream. This intersection is a problem and they support having the City resolve an issue that was allowed in 1984. He appreciated the neighbors’ concerns, but they are not proposing any change to the intersection. He was not prepared to make a presentation tonight as staff planned to request the public hearing be continued. He requested an opportunity to provide additional information next week. Mayor Earling opened the public participation portion of the public hearing. Jerry Janacek, Edmonds, resident to the north of the requested vacation, said the notice of public hearing that he and his neighbors received stated, Dedication of a Portion of Excelsior Place Adjacent to the Property Located at 19511 94th Place West. Most of the residents have lived in their homes for 30-40 years and were here to ask questions: 1. Vacation is often a process used for real estate development. Is this the ultimate intent of this request? 2. If this is a correct assumption, how much of the several acres of greenbelt would potentially be developed? 3. Does the City have a policy to reduce or eliminate greenbelts and would this be one of the effects? 4. Since the nearby property is located on a steep slope along a ravine with a year-round stream, how would this impact nearby properties? Stream requires 75-foot setbacks; an issue if the property is to be developed. 5. As there are owls, woodpeckers and other wildlife in this area, is an Environmental Impact Study needed? In summary, what impact would this proposed change to Excelsior Place have on their neighborhood? He submitted written comments. Hearing no further comment, Mayor Earling closed the public participation portion of the hearing. Mr. Lien said the public hearing is solely on the vacation request which was precipitated via the lot line adjustment so he was hesitant to talk about the criteria for lot line adjustment versus the vacation. Minimizing impacts to the critical areas is one of the public benefits provided by vacation. He identified the location of the five existing lots of record. Accessing some of those lots would require crossing a steep slope, going through a wetland, and across the stream and development would likely occur through the critical area reasonable use exception variance process and would likely impact some of the critical areas. The lot line adjustment rearranges the existing five lots to provide more building area outside the critical areas and critical area buffers. Attachment 28 4.9.b Packet Pg. 344 Attachment: Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachments (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes September 25, 2018 Page 5 Mr. Lien explained if/when development applications are submitted on the lot line adjustment, they would be subject to critical area review. If they are within 50 feet of the top of the slope, geotechnical reports would be required; if they are within 200 feet of the wetland, they would be likely to require a wetland determination. The boundaries of the wetlands are known but not the classification; the classification and habitat score determine the buffer. With regard to critical areas and environmental concerns, they would be considered in accordance with the City’s regulations at the time of development review. With regard to the question about the intent to further develop the area, Mr. Landsverk answered the purpose of this exercise was to limit the amount of development. They are not proposing a land action application, simply a boundary line adjustment to avoid the critical areas. Doing the vacation in conjunction with the boundary line adjustment will allow the home sites to be located in the least critical, flattest area of the 11+ acres. Councilmember Buckshnis suggested superimposing the critical area map on the map of the boundary line adjustment lots. As there are a lot of wetlands, native birds, trees and nature in this area, it would be helpful to see how that is impacted. She asked whether an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) would be required. Mr. Lien answered street vacation, lot line adjustment and single family development are all exempt from SEPA review, therefore, an EIS is not required. Councilmember Buckshnis asked about the zoning of the area. Mr. Lien answered it is RS-12. Councilmember Buckshnis recalled across street the RS-12 zoning was changed to RS-8. Mr. Lien said a Comprehensive Plan change would be required to change the zoning from RS-12. Councilmember Teitzel recalled Mr. Lien’s comment that if the vacation were granted, a water meter would need to be installed at the boundary of the vacation. He asked if only one home to the east is served by that water line or would multiple meters and water mains need to be installed to serve those residents. Engineering Program Manager Jeanie McConnell explained if the City were to relinquish ownership of a portion of the water main and it became private, the water meters for properties served from that portion of the public main that would then be private would have their water service relocated to the public portion of the main and spaghetti lines installed from the meter to those homes. She asked how many homes are currently served from the portion of water main adjacent to Mr. Landsverk’s property. Mr. Landsverk said one home. Ms. McConnell explained if the City relinquished more of the public main beyond the area of vacation and further west where Excelsior intersects with 94th Place West, additional homes would have their water services relocated. Councilmember Teitzel asked the cost to the City for installing new water meters and reconfiguring the sewer main if the vacation were granted. Ms. McConnell answered the City would need to do new taps on the water mains and set new meters; those costs would be the applicant’s as a condition of the vacation. COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR EXCELSIOR PLACE STREET VACATION TO OCTOBER 2, 2018. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY 2. PUBLIC HEARING TO CONTINUE MORATORIUM ON DEVELOPMENT OF RESIDENTIAL UNITS IN THE BD ZONING DISTRICT WITHOUT ON-SITE VEHICLE PARKING SPACES Development Services Director Shane Hope explained when permits were issued for a property downtown under the existing code which allowed buildings in the BD zone not to provide parking if the building footprint was 4800 square feet or less, staff approved it based on the existing code. To allow the Council, Planning Board and public to weigh in on appropriate regulations for parking in the BD Zone, the Council Attachment 28 4.9.b Packet Pg. 345 Attachment: Exhibit 2: PLN20180021 Staff Report for October 2nd Council Hearing with Attachments (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes September 25, 2018 Page 2 Doug Swartz, Edmonds, referred to Housing Task Force, a task force with members hand-picked by the Mayor, and found it appalling that many of the members do not live in or have a connection to Edmonds and a majority are in the homelessness business or building business. He challenged the task force to provide examples where input from the public changed anything in the document, noting most of the project was done out of the public’s sight. Passage of the Housing Strategy will fundamentally and permanently change Edmonds. The zoning changes that will quickly be passed after the approval of the Strategy will present a field day for developers with the development of taller buildings and buildings with insufficient parking. At its core, the document is focused on removing regulations that have made Edmonds what it is and have kept developers responsible. These are the same tactics that have been repeatedly tried and failed in San Francisco, Portland and Seattle. He quoted the head of the Portland Police Union, “homelessness has turned Portland into a cesspool.” The San Francisco Chronicle reported the San Francisco tourism industry struggles to explain the street misery that horrified visitors see. Examples of Seattle’s failed efforts regarding the homeless are readily apparent in the local news. He requested the City Council form a new group of regular citizens, for and against the current document, to discuss in an open forum whether the current draft Housing Strategy is what citizens want. He requested the Council commit to taking no action on this document until they obtain citizen feedback. Even if Councilmembers agree with the draft document, it is their responsibility to listen to the arguments of their constituents. 6. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. PUBLIC HEARING FOR EXCELSIOR PLACE STREET VACATION Environmental Program Manager Kernen Lien explained additional information was received after staff prepared the agenda memo and recommendation. Therefore, staff requests that following public comment, the hearing be continued until next Tuesday. He reviewed:  Initiation of proceedings: o ECDC 20.70.050.B – Petition of owners of more than two-thirds of property abutting the portion of street or alley to be vacated o Resolution No. 1417 set public hearing for tonight  Map identifying vacation request area  Right-of-way established via 20’ right-of-way in the Edmonds Seaview tract in 1906 and has not been brought u to City standards since 1906  ECDC 20.70.020 – Criteria for Vacation o The vacation is in the public interest o No property will be denied direct access as a result of the vacation  Vacation request an outgrowth of a lot line adjustment application the City received o One of proposed lots, Parcel A spanned the Excelsior Place right-of-way and City could not approve a lot that straddles a right-of-way o Applicants given options  Amend lot line adjustment so no parcels straddle the right-of-way or  Apply for a street vacation o Five existing lots of record  Public benefit of vacation - Allows lot line adjustment to proceed and minimizes potential impacts to critical areas - City no longer have responsibility and liability associated with right-of-way  Issues staff considered o Traffic Flow  Excelsior Place right-of-way improved in two places - Area between improved areas is steep so Excelsior Place unlikely to be extended - City received comment that some residents use improved area and private road to access 196th St SW 4.9.c Packet Pg. 346 Attachment: Exhibit 3: September 25, 2018 City Council Minutes Excerpt (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - Resolution of Intent to Vacate) Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes September 25, 2018 Page 3 o Sight Distance  Required sight distance to turn left from 94th Place W onto Puget Drive is 300 feet; actual sight distance is 200 feet  Aerial map of access based on Easements of Record o Properties that have rights to use 94th Place W o Private drive that connects 196th to improved area of Excelsior Place o Properties that has legal rights to use both In its previous recommendation, staff considered whether residents who have historically used the private road have prescriptive rights to continue. Staff received additional information since the staff report was prepared regarding how the area is signed and communications over the years. He displayed:  View into the right-of-way proposed to be vacated from the west and east  Photograph of private drive signs on the west and east  Applicants provided correspondence with residents on the west informing them this is not a public road and indicating on occasion they have stopped people driving on the private road  Staff plans to further research the turn from 94th Place W to Puget Drive o When some of the lots were platted in 1984, the City conditioned the plat to be right turn in/out from 94th Place W - Some striping remains hinting at right in/out - Drivers currently make left turns in/out  Utilities o Water and sewer mains exist in the right-of-way, installed by the applicant who is requesting the street vacation o Options  City maintain ownership and require utility easement  Applicant assume ownership of water and sewer mains - City typically relinquishes ownership at manhole; existing manholes result in private utility within the public right-of-way - Water meters would need to be moved back to the public right-of-way and separate water lines installed o Applicant proposed to give the City a utility easement and provide a turnaround for City and emergency vehicles  ECDC 20.70.140 Final Decision o Following the public hearing, the City Council shall 1. Adopt an ordinance granted the vacation; or 1. Adopt an ordinance granted the vacation; or 2. Adopt a motion denying the vacation; or 3. Adopt a resolution of intent were specific conditions must be met within 90 days a. Either i. Monetary compensation up to one-half fair market value ii. Grant of substitute public right-of-way iii. Any combination of a.i or a.ii Or b. Grant of an easement to the City in exchange for easement vacated Mr. Lien explained monetary compensation cannot be required if the City receives a utility easement. The appraised value of the right-of-way is $10,500; per City Code, if monetary compensation could be accepted, it would be half the appraised value or approximately $5,000. 4.9.c Packet Pg. 347 Attachment: Exhibit 3: September 25, 2018 City Council Minutes Excerpt (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - Resolution of Intent to Vacate) Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes September 25, 2018 Page 4 Staff’s previous recommendation was to deny the vacation; given the additional information received since the staff report was issued, staff requests the City Council continue the public hearing to October 2 to allow staff time to consider the new information, conduct further research and reconsider its recommendation. Councilmember Tibbott referred to the map identifying the critical areas and asked if the stream is open or in a culvert. Mr. Lien answered it is open to the middle of the wetland area. Councilmember Teitzel said he drove to the site yesterday and looked at 94th Place West. As he exited south, he noticed a right turn only sign in addition to the yellow marking. He asked if drivers turning left were breaking the law. Mr. Lien answered staff will research that. Applicant Duane Landsverk, agreed 94th Place W was signed no left turn but most officers have been fairly lenient when issues have occurred there over the years as the sign has been missing at times, etc. Even prior to 1984, that intersection was difficult. That condition will not change for the existing lots that use that intersection. He was confused with staff’s concern with that situation when new lots were not being created. The lots exist; their goal is to create a better situation and avoid building on a critical slope, in a wetland or next to a stream. This intersection is a problem and they support having the City resolve an issue that was allowed in 1984. He appreciated the neighbors’ concerns, but they are not proposing any change to the intersection. He was not prepared to make a presentation tonight as staff planned to request the public hearing be continued. He requested an opportunity to provide additional information next week. Mayor Earling opened the public participation portion of the public hearing. Jerry Janacek, Edmonds, resident to the north of the requested vacation, said the notice of public hearing that he and his neighbors received stated, Dedication of a Portion of Excelsior Place Adjacent to the Property Located at 19511 94th Place West. Most of the residents have lived in their homes for 30-40 years and were here to ask questions: 1. Vacation is often a process used for real estate development. Is this the ultimate intent of this request? 2. If this is a correct assumption, how much of the several acres of greenbelt would potentially be developed? 3. Does the City have a policy to reduce or eliminate greenbelts and would this be one of the effects? 4. Since the nearby property is located on a steep slope along a ravine with a year-round stream, how would this impact nearby properties? Stream requires 75-foot setbacks; an issue if the property is to be developed. 5. As there are owls, woodpeckers and other wildlife in this area, is an Environmental Impact Study needed? In summary, what impact would this proposed change to Excelsior Place have on their neighborhood? He submitted written comments. Hearing no further comment, Mayor Earling closed the public participation portion of the hearing. Mr. Lien said the public hearing is solely on the vacation request which was precipitated via the lot line adjustment so he was hesitant to talk about the criteria for lot line adjustment versus the vacation. Minimizing impacts to the critical areas is one of the public benefits provided by vacation. He identified the location of the five existing lots of record. Accessing some of those lots would require crossing a steep slope, going through a wetland, and across the stream and development would likely occur through the critical area reasonable use exception variance process and would likely impact some of the critical areas. The lot line adjustment rearranges the existing five lots to provide more building area outside the critical areas and critical area buffers. 4.9.c Packet Pg. 348 Attachment: Exhibit 3: September 25, 2018 City Council Minutes Excerpt (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - Resolution of Intent to Vacate) Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes September 25, 2018 Page 5 Mr. Lien explained if/when development applications are submitted on the lot line adjustment, they would be subject to critical area review. If they are within 50 feet of the top of the slope, geotechnical reports would be required; if they are within 200 feet of the wetland, they would be likely to require a wetland determination. The boundaries of the wetlands are known but not the classification; the classification and habitat score determine the buffer. With regard to critical areas and environmental concerns, they would be considered in accordance with the City’s regulations at the time of development review. With regard to the question about the intent to further develop the area, Mr. Landsverk answered the purpose of this exercise was to limit the amount of development. They are not proposing a land action application, simply a boundary line adjustment to avoid the critical areas. Doing the vacation in conjunction with the boundary line adjustment will allow the home sites to be located in the least critical, flattest area of the 11+ acres. Councilmember Buckshnis suggested superimposing the critical area map on the map of the boundary line adjustment lots. As there are a lot of wetlands, native birds, trees and nature in this area, it would be helpful to see how that is impacted. She asked whether an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) would be required. Mr. Lien answered street vacation, lot line adjustment and single family development are all exempt from SEPA review, therefore, an EIS is not required. Councilmember Buckshnis asked about the zoning of the area. Mr. Lien answered it is RS-12. Councilmember Buckshnis recalled across street the RS-12 zoning was changed to RS-8. Mr. Lien said a Comprehensive Plan change would be required to change the zoning from RS-12. Councilmember Teitzel recalled Mr. Lien’s comment that if the vacation were granted, a water meter would need to be installed at the boundary of the vacation. He asked if only one home to the east is served by that water line or would multiple meters and water mains need to be installed to serve those residents. Engineering Program Manager Jeanie McConnell explained if the City were to relinquish ownership of a portion of the water main and it became private, the water meters for properties served from that portion of the public main that would then be private would have their water service relocated to the public portion of the main and spaghetti lines installed from the meter to those homes. She asked how many homes are currently served from the portion of water main adjacent to Mr. Landsverk’s property. Mr. Landsverk said one home. Ms. McConnell explained if the City relinquished more of the public main beyond the area of vacation and further west where Excelsior intersects with 94th Place West, additional homes would have their water services relocated. Councilmember Teitzel asked the cost to the City for installing new water meters and reconfiguring the sewer main if the vacation were granted. Ms. McConnell answered the City would need to do new taps on the water mains and set new meters; those costs would be the applicant’s as a condition of the vacation. COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR EXCELSIOR PLACE STREET VACATION TO OCTOBER 2, 2018. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY 2. PUBLIC HEARING TO CONTINUE MORATORIUM ON DEVELOPMENT OF RESIDENTIAL UNITS IN THE BD ZONING DISTRICT WITHOUT ON-SITE VEHICLE PARKING SPACES Development Services Director Shane Hope explained when permits were issued for a property downtown under the existing code which allowed buildings in the BD zone not to provide parking if the building footprint was 4800 square feet or less, staff approved it based on the existing code. To allow the Council, Planning Board and public to weigh in on appropriate regulations for parking in the BD Zone, the Council 4.9.c Packet Pg. 349 Attachment: Exhibit 3: September 25, 2018 City Council Minutes Excerpt (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - Resolution of Intent to Vacate) Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes October 2, 2018 Page 7 1. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING FOR EXCELSIOR PLACE STREET VACATION Mayor Earling recalled due to information submitted prior to the public hearing last week, at staff’s request, the public hearing was continued. Environmental Programs Manager Kernen Lien displayed a map of the proposed street vacation, a portion north of 19511 94th Place West, just above Puget Drive. He reviewed:  Initiation of proceedings: o ECDC 20.70.050.B – Petition of owners of more than two-thirds of property abutting the portion of street or alley to be vacated o Resolution No. 1417 set public hearing September 25, 2018 o Continued public hearing to October 2nd  ECDC 20.70.020 – Criteria for Vacation o The vacation is in the public interest o No property will be denied direct access as a result of the vacation  Applicant submitted a statement in support of the public interest criteria o Proposed street vacation would vacate a substandard road and revert the road back to private ownership  Street proposed to be vacated was created in 1906 via the Edmonds Seaview Tracts  Since 1906 the right-of-way has not been widened or improved to City standards o Vacating will relieve the City of any financial burden or liability associated with the public right-of-way  Vacation request an outgrowth of a lot line adjustment application the City received o One of proposed lots, Parcel A, extended across the Excelsior Place right-of-way and City could not approve a lot that extends over a right-of-way o Applicants then applied for a street vacation o Map of five existing lots of record and critical areas  Lot line adjustment allows more developable area outside the critical areas, minimizing impacts to critical area o Map of location of the five proposed lots  Vacation allows lot line adjustment to proceed and minimizes potential impacts to critical  Issues staff considered related to the street vacation o Traffic Flow  Portion of Excelsior Place that is the subject of the vacation is not directly connected to a right-of-way - Private road to Puget Drive - Excelsior Place right-of-way open in small area off Olympic Avenue but is not connected - City received comment that some residents use the private road to access Puget Drive instead of using 94th Place  Aerial map of access based on Easements of Record identifying: - Properties that have rights to use 94th Place W - Properties that have rights to use private drive that connects to Puget Drive - Properties that have legal rights to use both - Although some residents state they historically used the private drive, it may not be a permissible action - Private drive signage on both ends of the private drive - Applicants have frequently stopped drivers using their private drive o Safety issues with access from 94th Place West to Puget Drive  Required sight distance is 300 feet; actual sight distance is 200 feet 4.9.d Packet Pg. 350 Attachment: Exhibit 4: October 2, 2018 City Council Minutes Excerpt (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - Resolution of Intent to Vacate) Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes October 2, 2018 Page 8 - Long standing issue, first noted with a 4-lot subdivision approved in 1982 - At that time, City Engineer required access onto Puget Drive from 94th Place W be right in/out only - Existing signage: right turn only on 94th Place W, no left turn from Puget Drive and Hidden Driveway Ahead sign on Puget Drive o Staff determined the street vacation has little or no effect on existing traffic flow or sight distance conditions  Other issues City staff considered o Utilities  Water and sewer mains exist in the right-of-way  Operation and maintenance of utilities typically more efficient when utilities located in public right-of-way versus private easement  Existing water and sewer mains located mostly within paved driveway areas which helps prevent overgrowth and backyard improvements  Applicant has offered to provide public safety and utility easement turnaround as a condition of the subject street vacation. Turnaround would be a public benefit as it improves existing access conditions  ECDC 20.70.140 Final Decision o Following the public hearing, the City Council shall 1. Adopt an ordinance granted the vacation; or 1. Adopt an ordinance granted the vacation; or 2. Adopt a motion denying the vacation; or 3. Adopt a resolution of intent were specific conditions must be met within 90 days a. Either i. Monetary compensation up to one-half fair market value ii. Grant of substitute public right-of-way iii. Any combination of a.i or a.ii Or b. Grant of an easement to the City in exchange for easement vacated o Monetary compensation cannot be required if the City receives a utility easement within the right-of-way  The appraised value of the Excelsior vacation area is $10,500; per City Code, if monetary compensation could be accepted, it would be half the appraised value or approximately $5,000.  Staff Recommendation o Staff has found the proposed street vacation to be in accordance with the criteria in ECDC 20.70.020 and recommends approval with the following conditions: 1. A public utility easement shall be provided to the City of Edmonds for the installation, construction, operation, maintenance, repair, reconstruction and/or replacement of the water and sewer systems and necessary appurtenances, over, across, through and below the subject Excelsior Place vacation. 2. A utility access and emergency vehicle turn-around shall be constructed to City standards and easement shall be provided in a location agreed upon by the property owners and the City Engineering Division and Snohomish County Fire District No. 1. 3. A private access easement shall be provided to all lots with frontage on the vacated portion of Excelsior Place. 4. If the property in the area of vacation is developed and the vacation area will serve three or more lots, an emergency access road consistent with Snohomish County Fire District No. 1 Fire Lane Standards will be required. 4.9.d Packet Pg. 351 Attachment: Exhibit 4: October 2, 2018 City Council Minutes Excerpt (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - Resolution of Intent to Vacate) Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes October 2, 2018 Page 9 Mr. Lien said if the Council agrees with staff’s recommendation, the Council should direct staff to prepare a resolution of intent for approval at a future Council meeting. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas asked for clarification that the turning directions onto and from 94th would not change. Mr. Lien agreed they would not change. Councilmember Buckshnis referred to page 117 of the packet that states as of the writing of this staff report the City had not received any written objections to the proposed street vacation, however, page 215 of the packet is a letter from John and Shirley Vicklund stating they hope the City will reject the proposal. Mr. Lien said the comment referenced on page 117 is in response to ECDC 20.040.B that the states, “The city shall not proceed with the vacation if the owners of 50 percent or more of the property abutting the street or alley or part thereof, or underlying the easement or part thereof, to be vacated file a written objection in the planning division prior to the time of the hearing.” The Vicklund’s property does not directly abut the street. The packet includes comments from Vicklund, Janacek and Reidy but none of them directly abut the street. Councilmember Teitzel recalled in last week’s agenda memo, staff recommended denial; he asked what had changed. Mr. Lien answered what changed was the additional information received, particularly with regard to access and utilities which were staff’s primary concerns when reviewing the street vacation request. The applicant submitted additional information about the history of people driving through the property, both sides are marked private drive, the applicant stated over the years they have stopped people driving through the private drive. Since the original staff report, the applicant also proposed a turnaround for emergency vehicles and utility maintenance. The history of the access and the fact that that will not change with the vacation and the additional public benefit provided by the turnaround were the primary reasons for the change in staff’s recommendation. Since Excelsior place has been a public right-of-way for all these years, Councilmember Teitzel asked how the property owners could legally post that portion of Excelsior Place as a private driveway. Engineering Program Manager Jeanie McConnell explained it is currently considered a driveway that meanders through the right-of-way, partially on private property and partially within the Excelsior Place right-of-way. Due to its meandering onto private property, it is not a completely accessible public right-of-way. Councilmember Johnson asked for an explanation of the fourth recommendation. Mr. Lien explained that was a comment from Snohomish County Fire when they reviewed the street vacation; they require emergency access up to fire standards at the time of development of three or more lots. Councilmember Johnson asked the standard requirement for a fire road. Mr. Lien answered they are included in the packet. Councilmember Johnson asked if this is considered three or more because of the two existing lots. Mr. Lien answered there are only two now. Councilmember Johnson asked if two more buildable lots would count as four. Mr. Lien said if additional single-family residences are built after the lot line adjustment, it would serve three or more lots and that is when Snohomish County Fire would require the road be brought up to their standards. Councilmember Johnson asked what Snohomish County Fire’s standards were compared to the City’s standards. Ms. McConnell said access via driveway with 1-2 lots would require a 15-foot wide access easement with 12-feet paved. If that is increased to three or more lots, the Fire Department would require 20 feet be paved. The lots currently exist but if they are developed, Fire would require the road be improved to their standards. Councilmember Johnson asked how the right-of-way be can vacated if the current Excelsior place right-of-way width is 20 feet and the Fire Department asks for 20 feet. Ms. McConnell answered Excelsior place right-of-way is 20 feet, but the paved area may not be 20 feet in that area. Regardless of whether it is a public right-of-way or an access easement, there are standards for pavement 4.9.d Packet Pg. 352 Attachment: Exhibit 4: October 2, 2018 City Council Minutes Excerpt (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - Resolution of Intent to Vacate) Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes October 2, 2018 Page 10 width. With the development of additional lots, the Fire Department has the authority within the City Code to require the pavement area be widen. Councilmember Johnson reiterated if the current easement is 20 feet and the Fire Department requires 20 feet, why would the City choose to vacate Excelsior Place. Mr. Lien displayed a survey of the property, pointing out the existing driveway that zigzags through Excelsior Place and is not completely contained within the 20-foot right-of-way. If Excelsior Place were vacated and Fire required the paved are be expanded, it would not necessarily be within the existing Excelsior Place right-of-way. Considering that the City wants to maintain the sewer and water in the roadway, Councilmember Johnson asked if staff could forecast the right-of-way location if a road had to be built to Fire’s standards. Ms. McConnell said it potentially still could be provided in a similar alignment as the existing driveway but widened as needed to meet Fire Department requirements. Given there are existing paved areas, it could follow the same alignment and simply be wider. It would not necessarily need to fall within the exact Excelsior Place right-of-way as it currently exists. Councilmember Johnson relayed her understanding that that determination would be made in the future. Ms. McConnell said the existing conditions meet the requirement of the City and the Fire Department. If additional building permits are issued for single family residences, the Fire Department has stated they will require the road meet Fire Department standards. Councilmember Johnson observed the purpose of the lot line adjustment was to build new homes. Mr. Lien answered yes and the applicant has proposed to install a turnaround for utility maintenance and emergency vehicles. If additional lots are developed, per this condition, the road would need to be brought up to Fire standards and the turnaround provided. Even with the vacation, the access currently meets City and Fire standards. Councilmember Johnson said it potentially may not meet future Fire standards. Mr. Lien explained the lot line adjustment does not create additional buildable lots. There are currently five lots of record and with the lot line adjustment, there will still be five lots of record. Even with the current layout, if development were proposed, Fire would still require the existing driveway to be brought up to Fire standards, whether it is in the Excelsior Place right-of-way or other right-of-way. That will be part of development permit review when single family residences are proposed. Councilmember Johnson asked for clarification regarding the nature of the road itself and asked staff to explain how private driveways are determined, whether they could serve nine single family lots. Ms. McConnell answered there are variations. In general, 1-4 lots would be accessed from a private road. Five lots or more there is potential for the City to require a dedication of public right-of-way; it is somewhat dependent on the utilities, ability to access, etc. Generally with 10 lots or more there is a guarantee of dedication of public right-of-way. Between five to nine lots, there are variations, sometimes the access is via a private access road and sometimes it is a public road. Councilmember Johnson asked how many lots would have access if the lot line adjustment were made. Mr. Lien answered with the lot line adjustment, there is no change to the number of lots that have access in this area now because there are five lots of record now and there would still be five lots of record after the lot line adjustment. Councilmember Johnson asked if the four lots to the west were counted. Mr. Lien identified the five existing lots of record. Councilmember Johnson asked if the lot to the west was accessed via a private drive or public street. Mr. Lien identified the private drives. Councilmember Johnson said four lots plus five makes nine lots. She was having difficulty with the definition of private drive because if the entire extent was private, it served ten or more even though they were built at different times. Ms. McConnell said in the development review process, staff considers existing conditions as well as access easement or right-of-way that the lots to be developed abut. During the development process, existing 4.9.d Packet Pg. 353 Attachment: Exhibit 4: October 2, 2018 City Council Minutes Excerpt (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - Resolution of Intent to Vacate) Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes October 2, 2018 Page 11 private driveways would not be required to be converted to public right-of-way, only the portion where additional homes are being constructed would be considered. Due to existing conditions and the nature of the development in the area with private drives on either end of Excelsior Place, the portion of Excelsior Place would not be required to be converted to public right-of-way. She clarified if Councilmember Johnson’s question was if Excelsior Place is vacated now, would it later be required to be public right-of- way and if so, the answer was no. The lot currently exist so there would not be additional development conditions to create public right-of-way when homes are built on those lots. The Fire Department has the authority via the code to require additional paved area with the construction of single-family residences. Councilmember Johnson commented there are different requirements and different definitions and it was difficult for her to understand how it added up to a street vacation. She felt she was missing a vital piece of information but was unsure what that was. Lee Michaelis, Puget Sound Planning, representing the applicants and the adjacent property owners, displayed the proposed Boundary Line Adjustment, explaining the north two lots are on the north side of the ravine. The best way to develop those is via a lot line adjustment to reconfigure the lots to avoid crossing the stream or impacting the wetland or steep slopes. He displayed a drawing of the five buildable areas via the reconfiguration. As the lot on the far left crosses the right-of-way, staff suggested a street vacation. He summarized the lot line adjustment to create five suitable areas for development rather than the five legal lots was the reason for the street vacation request. Councilmember Tibbott asked for clarification, when the street is vacated it is no longer City right-of-way, but the City retains an easement. Ms. McConnell answered because of the water and sewer utilities, the City would retain an easement for utilities through the vacated portion of right-of-way. Councilmember Tibbott asked if there would be any language that the easement would be paved and maintained in a manner so as to provide access to those utilities. Ms. McConnell assured there would be language in the easement document specific to access and maintenance. Councilmember Tibbott said the expectation was that the meandering driveway would be maintained for easement purposes. Ms. McConnell answered yes. Applicant Mr. Michaelis reviewed: 1) Vacation is in the public interest:  Preservation/reduced impact to critical area. The proposed boundary line adjustment, which triggered the need for the street vacation, allows construction to take place on more suitable areas of the property rather than on or close to critical areas.  Provide a much-needed vehicle turnaround that will be used by emergency and maintenance vehicles. The location of the turnaround will be agreed upon by the property owners, City Engineering Division, and Snohomish County Fire District No. 1. 2) No property will be denied direct access as a result of the vacation  All five reconfigured lots will have direct access to the new private access easement, with continued access to 196th St SW and Puget Drive.  Public Comments o Comment #1 (Vicklund)  City has implemented right in / right out at the intersection of 94th Pl W and Puget Drive.  There is no public connection from the properties west of the proposed vacation to 194th St SW.  The subsequent lot line adjustment will not increase traffic from what can be allowed today. o Comment #2 (Janacek)  The purpose of the street vacation is to allow the reconfiguration of 5 lots of record, to reduce the impacts to the critical areas (wetlands, streams, steep slopes) and wildlife habitat associated with the critical areas. 4.9.d Packet Pg. 354 Attachment: Exhibit 4: October 2, 2018 City Council Minutes Excerpt (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - Resolution of Intent to Vacate) Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes October 2, 2018 Page 12  In general, future construction will take place in the shaded area previously shown, reducing the impact to properties to the north. o Comment #3(Reidy)  We concur with the city staff’s conclusion that under current regulations, the appraisal was required and submitted. Proposed Option C does not require the need for an appraisal and the clarification requested by Mr. Reidy should not hold up the decision on the proposed street vacation  Applicant agrees with staff’s conditions of approval. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas referred to the applicant’s proposed Boundary Line Adjustment (BLA) map illustrating the new configuration of the five lots, observing Excelsior extends through the middle of the lot to the west. Mr. Michaelis said if Excelsior Place remained, it would go through that lot. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas asked whether they could build on that area if the street vacation is granted. Mr. Michaelis answered it would depend on the utility and access easements which cannot be built on. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas asked if they were contemplating moving the right-of-way to create a buildable area. Mr. Michaels said the right-of-way would be replaced with an easement for City services and a private access easement. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas asked where the easement would be. Mr. Michaelis answered it would generally be along the current meandering driveway; the utility easement would be over the existing water and sewer lines. For Councilmember Buckshnis, Mr. Lien identified the existing lots of record and the new configuration. Councilmember Buckshnis commented basically the vacation is being done to provide buildable lots and stay out of the critical areas. Mr. Michaelis agreed, noting that is the primary public interest. Councilmember Teitzel said he drove the property, trespassing on the private driveway and found exiting 94th Place onto Puget Drive very disconcerting because drivers cannot see very far and that was exacerbated if a driver was speeding around the corner. Observing this is not a safe intersection, he asked if there was a way to improve the safety, particularly since more drivers would be using it and potentially turning left even though that was not allowed. Ms. McConnell said there are no projects planned for that intersection; that could be discussed with the Transportation Engineer. The street vacation will not change that condition. Councilmember Teitzel said westbound on Puget Drive there is a limited sight distance sign on the bank that is not easily visible. He suggested making the signage regarding the dangerous intersection ahead more apparent. Mayor Earling opened the public participation portion of the public hearing. Shirley Vicklund, Edmonds, said the Puget Drive hillside is unstable and the retaining wall has slid 4 feet, making it difficult to see to the east. When the wall was first built, drivers could see up the road. Emergency vehicles leaving Fire Station 16 stop traffic which results in 10-15 vehicles coming down the road, causing a 3-5 minute delay to exit their driveway. Drivers speed on Puget Drive; a nearby speed camera often registers 36 mph. She relayed their desire to have the neighborhood remain as it is. The Tuttles use the driveway to the east, her landscaper was given permission to use the east driveway, the applicant’s mother who lives at 19518 and her two renters use that driveway and other neighbors occasionally use the driveway. In 1989 they did a lot line adjustment on their property at the request of Lois Vineyard; the lot line adjustment included several conditions on developing Lot 1 and Lot 4 (the applicant’s) and giving the City the right to deny any more development on 94th Place West. The vacation is purely for the applicant’s personal gain to build houses and it impacts the critical area. Last week staff recommended denial and she hoped the Council would support denying the vacation. They were told by Duane Bowman in 1989 that only 7 houses could be on a private road; there are 6 lots on this road now and 1 owned by the Tuttles. 4.9.d Packet Pg. 355 Attachment: Exhibit 4: October 2, 2018 City Council Minutes Excerpt (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - Resolution of Intent to Vacate) Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes October 2, 2018 Page 13 Roger Hertrich, Edmonds, said he has observed this hill many times as he lives down the street and has always wondered how drivers exit that road because it is a very dangerous intersection. He has also seen the changes in the hillside when the trees were cut. He objected to turning City streets into private streets because the restrictions go away and the property owners can do whatever they want. He has enjoyed visiting that neighborhood to see the view but would not be welcome if it were a private road. Hearing no further public comment, Mayor Earling closed the public participation portion of the public hearing. Councilmember Buckshnis asked if the lots could be developed if they remained in the original configuration. Mr. Lien answered to build on the back two lots would require a critical area economic reasonable use variance, so they could potentially build on them via that process. Councilmember Buckshnis observed that was Lots 54 and 55. Councilmember Tibbott said he did not have a problem with the street vacation and was supportive of the proposal as it makes sense to adjust the lots as proposed so that development would occur away from the critical areas. It is currently a private drive and it is his understanding the lots to the west do not have an easement to use the private drive; that condition would not change with the street vacation. He did not see that the street vacation changed the use of the existing street and he found benefit in the environmental improvement and the turnaround. He supported the street vacation as long as the City retained a utility easement. Councilmember Johnson said in theory she had no problem with the lot line adjustment. She asked why the lot line adjustment was bundled with the street vacation. Mr. Lien explained when the applicant applied for the lot line adjustment, one of the lots would straddle Excelsior Place. The City would not approve the lot line adjustment that is bisected by right-of-way. Although the City’s code does not specifically address that, other jurisdictions and possibly state law indicate a lot bisected by right-of-way essentially creates two lots. One of the criteria for a lot line adjustment is it cannot create a new lot. The proposed configuration which included one lot bisected by Excelsior Place resulted in six lots which could not be approved. The applicants were given the option to adjust via a lot line adjustment or put the lot line adjustment on hold and apply for the street vacation; the applicant chose the street vacation. Councilmember Johnson observed the applicant could have chosen the lot line adjustment which would not create two lots. Mr. Lien answered they could have; he referred to the applicants BLA map, that results in more buildable area. The proposed configuration is a better layout which is why they chose the vacation process versus adjusting the lots. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas said she has heard from multiple sources that this is a private driveway, but her understanding is it is a City street. She asked if the property owners built on City land. Ms. McConnell explained Excelsior Place is a public right-of-way. The driveway was constructed when one of the lots was developed and served only one home. The property owner chose to meander that driveway within the public right-of-way and on private property, something the City found acceptable at that time. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas observed it is a public right-of-way, not a private driveway, but the City was aware the driveway was built on the public right-of-way. Ms. McConnell explained access to that portion of Excelsior Place is via existing private roads; the driveway that was constructed does not fall entirely or solely within Excelsior Place and meanders both within the right-of-way and onto private property which is what makes it inaccessible to some of the other properties. Councilmember Fraley- Monillas reiterated part of the driveway was built on Excelsior Place with the City’s knowledge and permission. Ms. McConnell agreed, referring to a map of the east end of Excelsior where the private driveway was not built within the right-of-way; that portion does not have public access. 4.9.d Packet Pg. 356 Attachment: Exhibit 4: October 2, 2018 City Council Minutes Excerpt (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - Resolution of Intent to Vacate) Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes October 2, 2018 Page 14 Council President Nelson relayed his understanding that if the Council did nothing and the applicant was interested in developing the top two properties, they would need to obtain a critical areas variance. Mr. Lien explained a critical area variance is a reasonable economic use variance. The process is a variance via the Hearing Examiner with specific criteria that needs to be met. One of the major criteria is minimum necessary development so the property owner can achieve reasonable economic use from the property. A reasonable economic use variance was recently approved where the minimum necessary was a house with an approximately 300 square foot footprint. There can still be impacts to the critical area as a result; the development could be in the wetland or the road could go through the wetland and/or stream provided it is the minimum necessary and it meets all the criteria. City Attorney Jeff Taraday said the recent approval of a home constructed pursuant to this standard established a ceiling above which single family homes were not likely to be approved under the minimum economic use variance. That square footage is probably the ceiling of what could be approved under that standards. Council President Nelson said he asked that question because he found it interesting one could enhance a critical areas by developing property. He was trying to understand the logic, one way or another the property would be developed; the question was which way had the least impact to the critical area. Mr. Lien said the configuration after the lot line adjustment has less impact to the critical areas. Councilmember Tibbott asked the difference between a public street, a City right-of-way and an easement and whether this would be considered a public street. Ms. McConnell answered Excelsior place is public right-of-way which would allow for the construction of a public street within the right-of-way. The right- of-way establishes the limits in which the public road could be built. An easement for the utility would give the City the right to operate, own, maintain, construct and reconstruct utilities within that easement area. The underlying ownership of the property would belong to the property owner, but the easement gives the City rights with regard to the utilities. Councilmember Tibbott said the right-of-way is not currently a public street; it is a private driveway that allows adjoining properties easement to the east but properties to the west do not have an easement to use the private driveway. Ms. McConnell answered the Excelsior Place public right-of-way has not been developed to public street standards. Councilmember Teitzel observed if the City choses to vacate, there are two choices, retain an easement or not. If the City does not retain an easement, water meters would need to be installed at the border of City property. Ms. McConnell agreed, explaining in addition to water meters, the portion of the water main that becomes private would be considered a fire line and other backflow devices would need to be installed to provide water quality protection between that fire line and the City system. An extensive amount of work would need to be done to covert that system from a public utility to a private system. Councilmember Teitzel asked who bore the cost of that conversation. Ms. McConnell answered it would not be borne by the City. Councilmember Teitzel asked if the sewer line served the five homes in the area or other homes uphill. Ms. McConnell answered there is potential for an additional lot on the eastern end that is currently on septic to tie into the sewer main. In addition, when the existing lots of record or as they are configured via the lot line adjustment are developed with single family residences, they would also connect to that sewer main. Councilmember Teitzel observed if the City vacated with no easement, the property owner was responsible for all costs associated with connection to that existing main. Ms. McConnell answered in a development process, even if a sewer is located in a public right-of-way versus an easement, the cost to connect to the City’s sewer system is borne by the property owner. Councilmember Teitzel said in effect if the right-of- way is vacated without retaining an easement, the existing water line and sewer main become private property. Ms. McConnell said if the City does not retain easements, it would be relinquished as privately- owned utility systems. 4.9.d Packet Pg. 357 Attachment: Exhibit 4: October 2, 2018 City Council Minutes Excerpt (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - Resolution of Intent to Vacate) Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes October 2, 2018 Page 15 Councilmember Buckshnis referred to staff’s recommendation, pointing out having the utilities become private was not one of the options. She asked if privatization of water and sewer was common in a city like Edmonds. Ms. McConnell answered it is not common. With a new subdivision with a private road where there is not a need for the City to own and maintain the utility system, a private sewer main may be installed via the development process. The water main would be in the City street and water service lines to individual properties. Councilmember Buckshnis asked for confirmation that staff was not recommending privatization. Ms. McConnell agreed staff was not. Councilmember Buckshnis commented the City needed to protect environment. Councilmember Johnson referred to the applicant’s BLA map, relaying her understanding there were two issues, first the lot line adjustment. It would be possible to create the amber and green lots in such a way that they could be built upon by allocating the northern portion of the amber lot to a different lot. If the intent was two building sites, one south of Excelsior Place and another north of Excelsior Place, both would be outside the critical areas and it would be possible build there. The second issue is the vacation of Excelsior Place. Although Excelsior Place serves as a private driveway, it is serving more than what a normal private driveway would serve, especially due to the northern, western and eastern sections. An improvement would be appropriate notwithstanding the current meandering onto private property. Since the Fire Department may require a 20-foot wide right-of-way, she concluded it did not make sense to abandon the public right-of-way so she will vote no. Duane Landsverk, applicant, asked Councilmember Johnson if she felt it was appropriate for the additional lots to the east, for them to suggest that they open the public right-of-way of Excelsior. First it would need to be constructed and then people would be sent to the end of Excelsior where they would trespass across neighboring lots to the east where there is no public access. Excelsior dead-ends and is only 20 feet wide. Councilmember Johnson said testimony has stated one can travel Excelsior Place and exit to the east. Mr. Landsverk said his private driveway meanders in and out of Excelsior; it is marked private and anyone using it is on private property. The public portion of Excelsior is 100% cut off. Councilmember Johnson asked if it was physically possible to drive to the east. Mr. Landsverk answered not without trespassing. COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TIBBOTT, TO DIRECT STAFF TO PREPARE A RESOLUTION OF INTENT TO VACATE WITH THE CONDITIONS IN THE STAFF REPORT IN EXHIBIT 1. MOTION CARRIED (5-1), COUNCILMEMBER JOHNSON VOTING NO. Mayor Earling declared a brief recess. 2. PUBLIC HEARING ON PERMIT DECISION MAKING AND QUASI-JUDICIAL PROCESSES Mayor Earling announced the Council would not discuss Agenda Items 8.1 and 8.2 tonight. Environmental Program Manager Kernen Lien reviewed:  Resolution No. 1367 o Council discussions in 2016 regarding the City Council sitting in a quasi-judicial capacity  Frustrations with ex-parte contact prohibitions  Liability issues for councilmembers o Resolution No. 1367  Requests city staff and Planning Board to prepare and forward to the City Council revisions to the ECDC modifying the City Council’s role in quasi-decision making processes o Code amendments since adoption of Resolution No. 1367 4.9.d Packet Pg. 358 Attachment: Exhibit 4: October 2, 2018 City Council Minutes Excerpt (Excelsior Place Street Vacation - Resolution of Intent to Vacate) City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 10/16/2018 Presentation of Policy Recommendations from Diversity Commission Staff Lead: Patrick Doherty Department: Community Services Preparer: Patrick Doherty Background/History In fulfillment of the following two key components of the Diversity Commission’s mandate, as laid out in the Edmonds City Code at 10.65.040: · Recommend to the Mayor and City Council diversity opportunities to promote programs, and provide guidance to assure an accessible, safe, welcoming and inclusive government and community, and · Support, challenge, and guide government and the community to eliminate and prevent all forms of discrimination The issues and recommendations contained in the attached memorandum were the result of the Commission’s work over the past few months which included interviews with Department heads, the Mayor, and two City Councilmembers. The recommendations are offered for consideration by the Mayor and/or Council, as appropriate. Staff Recommendation Presentation only. Council direction as to steps for further consideration may be offered. Narrative The attached memorandum contains the detailed recommendations from the Diversity Commission on five issues: 1. Create visibility within the City that the community is caring and embraces inclusiveness, equity and diversity. 2. Include diversity, equity and inclusiveness as an initiative within the City's employee Wellness Committee. 3. Ensure that transparent, accessible, safe and secure protocols be in place for dealing with discriminatory or hateful acts against both the public and employees. 4. Engage the City Council and Diversity Commission in more frequent dialogue about issues of diversity, equity and inclusion. 5. Increase staff support for the Diversity Commission and its programs and activities. Presentation will be made at Council meeting from Diversity Commission Chair, Vice-Chair and 5.1 Packet Pg. 359 supporting Commissioners. Attachments: Diversity Commission Memo 10-16-18 5.1 Packet Pg. 360 5.1.a Packet Pg. 361 Attachment: Diversity Commission Memo 10-16-18 (Presentation of Policy Recommendations from Diversity Commission) 5.1.a Packet Pg. 362 Attachment: Diversity Commission Memo 10-16-18 (Presentation of Policy Recommendations from Diversity Commission) 5.1.a Packet Pg. 363 Attachment: Diversity Commission Memo 10-16-18 (Presentation of Policy Recommendations from Diversity Commission) 5.1.a Packet Pg. 364 Attachment: Diversity Commission Memo 10-16-18 (Presentation of Policy Recommendations from Diversity Commission) City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 10/16/2018 Closed Record Review of the Planning Board’s recommendation to approve an application for rezone at 9111 and 9107 — 236th St. SW. from Single-Family Residential (RS-8) to Multiple Residential (RM-1.5) Staff Lead: Brad Shipley Department: Planning Division Preparer: Brad Shipley Background/History Martin Reimers, acting as an agent for the two property-owners, applied for a rezone of two properties located at 9107 and 9111-236th St. SW. If approved, the requested rezone would change the zoning of the properties from Single-Family Residential (RS-8) to Multiple Residential (RM-1.5). Staff Recommendation Accept the Planning Board's recommendation and adopt the ordinance provided in Attachment 6 rezoning the properties from RS-8 to RM-1.5. Narrative The subject properties were developed with a single family home (9107-236th St. SW) and two duplexes (9111-236th St. SW) at the time they were annexed into the City in 1997. Both parcels were designated Single Family (RS-8) when they were annexed. This created a legal non-conforming use on the property developed as multi-family. A site-specific rezone is a "Type IV-B" application. The Planning Board conducts a public hearing, reviews the proposal for consistency with Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) 20.40 (Rezones) and the Comprehensive Plan, then forwards a recommendation to City Council. The Council holds a closed- record review of the project and makes a final decision. Planning Board held a public hearing on July 25, 2018 and forwarded a recommendation to City Council to approve the rezone. Attachments: Attachment 1 - Staff Report with Attachments Attachment 2 - Zoning and Vicinity Map Attachment 3 - Staff's Public Hearing PowerPoint Presentation Attachment 4 - Public Hearing Sign-in Sheet Attachment 5 - Approved July 25, 2018 Planning Board Minutes Excerpt Attachment 6 - Draft Ordinance 7.1 Packet Pg. 365 CITY OF EDMONDS l2l 5th Avenue North, Edmonds WA 98020 Phone : 425.7 7 I .0220 . Fax : 425 .7 7 I .0221' Web : www.EdmondsWA. gov DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT . PLANNING DIVISION c. 18 9s PLANNING DIVISION ADVISORY REPORT FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS To: tr'rom: File: Project Summary: Public Hearing: City Planning Board ,As PLN20160044 A Type IV-B rezone application initiated by property owners, Frasier Fir, LLC and Pinewood Management, LLC. to change the zoning designation of properties located at9107l9l11 - 236th Street SV/ from Single Family Residential (RS-9) to Multiple Residentiol (RM-1.5). Julv 25,2018 at 7:00 PM Edmonds City Council Chambers / Public Safety Complex 250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds WA 98020 7 adS Page I of6 7.1.a Packet Pg. 366 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Staff Report with Attachments (Closed Record Review of Proposal to Rezone Property) I Pinegrove Properties Rezone: File PLN20l 80044 INTRODUCTION A. Applicant: Property owners Frasier Fir, LLC. & Pinewood Management, LLC. B. Sife Location: Two palcels located at9107 and 9111 - 236th Street SW (Attachment A). C. Request: To change the zoning designation from Single Family Residential (RS- 8) to Multiple Residential (RM-L.5) (Attachment B). D. Review Process: Arezone is a Type IV-B application. Staff makes a recommendation to the Planning Board. The Planning Board conducts a public hearing and forwards a recommendation to the City Council for a final decision. The application was submitted on September 12,2016 and determined to be complete on October 10,2016. A combinedNotice of Application and Public Hearing was issued (mailed/posted/published) on July 10,2018. This application has demonstrated compliance with the requirements of ECDC Chapter 20.02 (Development Project Permit Applications)' E. Major Issues: Compliance with ECDC Chapter 20.40 (Rezones). FINDINGS OF FACT A. Site Description: The site contains two parcels comprised of a total of approximatèty O.ZS acres or 33,000 square feet. The site addressed 9l l 1 -236rhSt. SW is developed with single family home and legal non-conforming multi- family building. Currently, the zoning designation is Single Family Residential "RS-8." B. Neighboring Development & Zoning: The neighborhood is mainly developed with multi-family homes (north, south, and east), with a less intense single family zoning and development pattem west of the site. The properties to the north, south, and east arc zoned RM-l.5 (Attachment A) while the properties to the west are zoned RS-8. The neighborhood is conveniently located near Edmonds Way, Highway 99, with public transit available along Edmonds V/ay. The adjacent "RM-1 .5" zonedproperties to the north and east are developed with a 120-unit affordable housing apartment complex, owned and managed by the Housing Authority of Snohomish County (HASCO), and four buildings, each containing four units for a total of 16 units. The three adjacent "RS-8" zoned properties are developed with two single family homes and a legal non-conforming duplex. C. State Environmental Policy Act: A Determination of Non-significance (DNS) was issued for the subject properties on September 11, 2017 for the preceding comprehensive plan map amendment (Attachment J). The DNS was adopted for the purposes of rezone on June 25,2018 (Attachment I). II. Page 2 of6 7.1.a Packet Pg. 367 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Staff Report with Attachments (Closed Record Review of Proposal to Rezone Property) Pinegrove Properties Rezone: File PLN20l 80044 D. Te'chnical Review Committee: This application was reviewed by the City of Edmonds Public Works Department, Engineering Division, and Snohomish County Fire District #1. Engineering provided a Memorandum of Compliance, noting that atransportation analysis shall be completed, as required, with future development of the property (Attachment H). No comments or conditions were noted by Snohomish County Fire District #1. E. Public Comments: To date, no public comments have been received on the rezone proposal. F. Edmonds Community Development Code Compliance: The Planning Board and City Council shall review the proposed rezone and the following factors shall be considered pursuant to ECDC Chapter 20.40 (Rezones): A. Comprehensive Plan. llhether the proposal is consistent with the comprehensive plan; The Comprehensive Plan map designation change from Single Family Urban I to Edmonds Way Corridor was heard by City Council on October 17,2017, under file 4MD20160008. Council made a motion to approve the comprehensive plan map designation change; however, the amendment was inadvertently omitted from the ordinance adopting the 2017 comprehensive plan amendments. Council is scheduled to take action on the 2018 comprehensive plan amendments on August 2I,2018. Once adopted, this proposal will be consistent with the comprehensive plan. The compatible zoning classifications for Edmonds Way Corridor plan map designation are BP, BN, BC, or similar commercialzone, or RM zones. There are several Comprehensive Plan goals and policies for the Multi Family designation (p. 68 of the 2017 Comprehensive Plan), most of which are policies of how new multi-family buildings should look in relation to neighboring single family developments. A discussion on building design would be premature at this point, but the following policy is still applicable: C.Z.a.i. RM uses should be located near arterial or collector streets. The proposal is located along 236th Street SW, approximately 300 feet from SR- 104, which is considered a major arterial. B. Zoníng Ordìnance. Whether the proposal is consistent with the purposes of the zoning ordinance, and whether the proposal is consistent with the purposes of the propo s ed zone district ; The current zoning designation allows one single family home per lot. The proposed new zoning designation of RM- I .5 would allow a density of six (6) dwelling units on property addressed 9107 - 236th Street SW and 14 dwelling units on property addressed 9111 - 236th Street SV/. The change from single famity (RS-S) to multiple residential (RM-1.5) would mean a potential increase in dwelling units. Below is a comparison of site development standards between the existing single family zone and the applicable compatible zoning classifications for the Multi Family Medium Density plan map designation. Page 3 of 6 7.1.a Packet Pg. 368 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Staff Report with Attachments (Closed Record Review of Proposal to Rezone Property) Zone Street Setback Side Setback Rear Setback Height Lot Coverage RS-8 25'7.s',15',25',3s% RM-l.5 15'10'15',25',4s% P ine gr ov e P r op erti es Rez one : F il e PLN 2 0 I 80044 C. Surrounding Area. The reløtionship of the proposed zoning change to the existing land uses and zoning of surrounding or nearby property; Surrounding uses in the subject areaare primarily multi-family and single family residential. There is some light commercial at the corner of 236th Street SV/ and SR-104. The subject site is bordered on three sides by multi-family (RM-1.5) zoning. Single-family (RS-8) zoning abuts the subject site to the west. The proposed rezone is compatible with the surrounding area. D. Chønges. llhether there has been sfficient change in the character of the immediate or surrounding area or in city policy to iustify the rezone; The proposed zoning is justified as the area is already developed with multi- family residential - which has existed since the late 1970's. In fact, a rezone of the property would bring a current legal non-conforming multi-family use located atglll -236th Street SV/ into compliance. E. Suitability. Whether the property is economically and physically suitable for the uses øllowed under the existing zoning, and under the proposed zoning. One factor could be the length of time the property has remained undeveloped compared to the surrounding area, and parcels elsewhere with the same zoning; The neighborhood comprising the subject properties has long been developed with either single family homes or apartments. The site is located approximately 300 feet from a major arterial so the traffic impact to the neighborhood would be minimal. If rezoned for multi-family use, a future development application would be required to submit atrafftc impact analysis. Also, a SEPA review would need to be conducted for any proposal with more than four (4) dwelling units. A thorough design review by the Architectural Design Board would also be required. F. Vølue. The relative gain to the public health, safety and welfare compared to the potentisl increase or decrease in value to the property owners. There is a potential increase in value to the applicants, because if the rezone is approved, then the property could eventually be re-developed with multiple dwelling units, whereas now the zoning constraints require only one house per lot. l:¡c:r I I izt*st l5r5 Rt.8 9l t5 rð zt tî*I i I I ?36'Ilt S I 5W 0 ó ô 911't Page 4 of6 7.1.a Packet Pg. 369 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Staff Report with Attachments (Closed Record Review of Proposal to Rezone Property) Pinegrove Properties Rezone: File PLN2OI 80044 Al$o, all of the RM-zones would allow an applicant to propose an office use (through the conditional use permit process, which requires a public hearing before the Hearing Examiner). The greatest impact of a future development wciuld be for the single family homes to the west; however, no questions or comments about this rezone application have been received to date. ilI. COI{CLUSIONS A. The proposal will be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan once amended. City Council is scheduled to take action on the 2018 comprehensive plan amendments on August 2I,2018. B. The proposal is consistent with proposed zoning district, in that multi-family residential uses already exist on one of the properties and single family homes are still permitted primary uses in multiple residential zones. C. The proposal is appropriate given the surrounding area, given that the subject site is bordered on three sides by multi-family zoning (RM-1.5). D. The surrounding area has been developed with multi-family uses since the late 1970's. E. The neighborhood appears to be both economically and physically suitable for the proposed zoningdesignation, as the property is flat and is located near amajor arterial and bus stops. F. There does not appear to be a gain in public health/safety/welfare compared to the potential increase in value to the property owners. There would be an increase in the tax base if we allowed a potential for more dwelling units, which would benefit the City as well as the property owner. G. After taking into consideration the above fezone factors, the rezone should be approved. IV. RECOMMENDATION Based on the findings of facts, analysis, conclusions, and attachments to this report, staff recommends that the Planning Board make a recommendation to the City Council to APPROVE the requested rezone from Single Family Residential (RS-9) to Multiple Residential (RM-1.5). Page 5 of6 7.1.a Packet Pg. 370 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Staff Report with Attachments (Closed Record Review of Proposal to Rezone Property) V P inegrov e Pr operties Rezone : File PLN20 I 80044 ATTACTIMENTS A. Zoningmap B. Land use application form C. Applicant Cover letter D. ECDC Chapter 20.40 (Rezones) E. ECDC Chapter 16.30 (RM - Multiple Residential) F. Multi-family Residential Land Use Policies, Comprehensive Plan,2017. Pg. 68 G. City Council Meeting Minutes, October 17,2017. H. Engineering Division Memorandum of Compliance, dated July 10, 2018. I. SEPA Adoption Notice J. SEPA DNS and Environmental Checklist K. Public Notices VI. PARTIES OF RECORI) A. Frasier Fir Tree, LLC. - 433 Sprague St., Edmonds V/A 98020 B. Pinewood Managem ent - 433 Sprague St., Edmonds V/A 98020 C. Martin Reimers - 1712 Pacific Ave., Suite 107, Everett, V/A 98201 D. City of Edmonds Planning Division Page 6 of6 7.1.a Packet Pg. 371 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Staff Report with Attachments (Closed Record Review of Proposal to Rezone Property) ffictuerZoning & VicinitY MaPI473I4757,3+22234305169205234734292351 5Ii gtlsï4315i5579i54723&"tr,u&z5Ëiiqozo\n508Subject Sites91119107Ií1oEroj{iiIcoóñlTÜÈ.23619âNotesLegendReZonesPRDRoWZoningI RS-6RS-8RS-10t\ Rs-12fl RSW-12fl RS-20n RS-MPI RM-3I RM-2.4I RM-1.5I nu-ewH BD1H BD2H BD3H BD4sl BDs#oR! wMUm"PIBNI FVMUIBc-Ita-WGS-1 984-Web-Mercator-Auxiliary-SphereO City of EdmondsThis map is a user generated static output from an lnternet mapping site and is forreference only. Data layers that appear on th¡s map may or may not be accurate,current, or otherw¡se relìableTHIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION94.0435071:2,2570,lê$'lATTACHMENT A7.1.aPacket Pg. 372Attachment: Attachment 1 - Staff Report with Attachments (Closed Record Review of Proposal to Rezone City of Edmonds Land Use Application T-f-() Q\ .-l_\r -¿.L ; ; è eÞ )-.)¿ cì-l) Øø .ø** 4-t;> and to tr ARCHITECTURAL DESICN REVIEW E CoMPREHENSIVEPLANAMENDMENT t] CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ! HoME OCCUPATION tr FORMAL SUBDIVISION D SHORT SUBDIVISION tr LoTLINEADJUSTMENT Ü PLANNEDRESIDENTIALDEVELOPMENT tr OFFICIAL STREET MAP AMENDMENT D STREETVACATIONx REZoNE P e nt 2o I (t o ct 1t1tr SHORELINE PERMIT t] VARIANCE / REASONABLE USE EXCEPTION D OTHER:- FILE I zoNE DATE q Ltz lt(REC,D BY RECEIPT#Fsp lZ, loo.<'o HEARING DATE - ! HE tr STAFF F,PB tr ADB reC . PLEASE NOTE THAT ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED WITHIN THE APPLICATION IS A PUBLIC RECORD . PROPERTY ADDRESS OR LOCATTON 9107 and 9113 236th Street SW PROJECT NAME (IF APPLICABLE) Fraser Fir The Pinegrove Properties Rezone I ree, LLU ano PROPERTY OWNER Pinewood Mont.llli PHONE # ADDRESS 433 Sprague St, Edmonds, WA cchuckbi .com FAX # TAxACCOUNT#005553001 001 02, 005553001 001 04 sEc 31 rwp. 27 RNc. 04 DEScpJprIoN oF PROJECT oR PRoPosED UsE (ATTACH covER LETTER AS NECESSARY)- Rezone and nrchensive Plan Amenclment DESCRIBEHowTHEPRoJECTMEETSAPPLIcABLECoDES(ATTACHCoVERLETTERASNECESSARY)- APPLIcANT Alan Sze PHor.iE #206.919.4612 ADDRESS E-MAIL FAx # CoNTAcr PERSoN/Acnnr Martin * 425.377.8786 Aoon¡ss 1 712 Pacific Avenue, Suite 107, Everett, WA E-MAIL mreimers@conceptarchitectu re.com FAX # T'þe undersigned applicant, and his/her/its heirs, and assigns, in consideration on the processing of the application agrees to release, indernniff,defend and hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any and all damages, including reasonable attorney's fees, arising from any action or infraction based in whole or part upon false, misleading, inaccurate or incomplete information furnished by the applicant, his/her/its agents or employees. By my signature, I certiff that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that I am authorized to file this application on the behalfofthe owner as listed below. STGNATURE oF AppuceNr/AcEt¡T DArE Property Owner's Authorization I,Alan Sze the penalty of perJury under the laws of the State of Washington that the following is a the above ApplicanVAgent to apply for the subject land use application, and and the staff of the City of Edmonds to enter the subject property for the purposes of SIGNATURE OF OWNER under application. DATE llOlì Ol l;l('lAt tJSh ONl \ Revised on 8/22/l 2 B - Land Use Page I of I ATTACHMENT B 7.1.a Packet Pg. 373 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Staff Report with Attachments (Closed Record Review of Proposal to Rezone Property) GOI\IGEPT ,I},FT Ül-{ ITMM-TUtrìË, LLN 6 September 2016 City of Edmonds Development Services Department 121 1th Avenue N Edmonds, WA 98020 e€c€.dvÈÐ Þt ^^ - (AlÊ. "atVUtkÇft_f RE: Rezone 9107 and 91 11 236th Street SW Dear Edmonds Planning Attached please find our application for processing a rezone of the two above referenced properties. We believe the zone change will be þeneficial and acceptable to the city. When viewing the zoning map of the area of our properties, it is immediately evident that the properties in question would be included in our desired zone had a straight line been used to define the limits of the zones. We are currently an RS-8 and desire a change to RM-1.5. Further, the 9111 property is currently a legally non-conforming multi-family use. A zone change would place this property in the proper zone for its current use. There are six criteria to be considered for your decision as follows: 1. Comprehensive Plan. The project will require a concurrent application for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment. ïhe current Comprehensive Plan Designation is Single Family Urban 1. This designation is consistent with the current zoning of RM-1.5. The subject property is surrounded on three sides with land that is designated Edmonds Way Corridor which allows RM zoning that we seek. The designation boundary lines are the same as the zoning boundary lines in this vicinity. Attached please find a project description which addresses the Comprehensive Plan directly, Because the goals of the Comprehensive Plan would be met by approving this modification, we believe this is a reasonable request.2. Zoning Ordinance. The current zoning is RS-8 which allows single family residences on lots with a minimum lot size of 8,000 SF. The subject properties are surrounded on two sides as well as across the street by Multi-Family zoned properties RM-1.5. Changing the zone in which our properties reside, would be consistent with current zoning in the area as it tends to simplify the boundaries of the zone and creates a more logical boundary.3. Surrounding Area. The property to the north of the subject property contains apartment units, the property to the east of the subject property contains condominiums, and the property across the street to the south contains a 4-plex multifamily building. One property to the west contains a duplex and the other single family zoned property to the west contains a single family dwelling. Properties radiating in the various directions from the subject property are consistent with their zoning.4. Change. The immediate area has been stable with the apartments to the north being newest, built in 1987. The neighborhood is made up of older structures and will be in need of updating or re-developing in the near future. A re-zoning of this property may result in new development which could spark a revitalizing of this area. 'l 7'12 Facifiu Âvenu* - $uite 1û7, Hvsræt1, WÅ 982ü1 - 42ã.377 .*78â 1ü0S Terminal l'{/ay - $uite 245, Êeno, NV 8S$ü? - î7S.?47.788S I/ii\$w.mnçeptarc hitecture.csm ATTACHMENT C 7.1.a Packet Pg. 374 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Staff Report with Attachments (Closed Record Review of Proposal to Rezone Property) 5. Suitability. The neighborhood and especially the immediate vicinity includes a great many multifamily units. The zoning of the subject properties to multi-family would be very suitable to the area that is already largely multifamily. 6. Value. The re-zoning of the subject property would enable new residential units to be developed in the city. By virtue of the new regulations in place, the new units would be more efficient and sustainable. This adds value to the city as a whole. New development would add to the property value of each property in the immediate vicinity as the financial investment shows confidence in the neighborhood. lf you have any questions or comments on the above or the attached, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Martin mers, AIA 7.1.a Packet Pg. 375 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Staff Report with Attachments (Closed Record Review of Proposal to Rezone Property) 7/20/2018 Chapter 20.40 REZONES http://www.codepublishing.com/WA/Edmonds/1/2 Chapter 20.40 REZONES Sections: 20.40.000 Scope. 20.40.010 Review. 20.40.020 Contract rezones. 20.40.030 Notice. 20.40.000 Scope. The requirements of this chapter apply to proposed rezones, which are changes in the zone districts by amendment to the official zoning map that apply to parcels of property. 20.40.010 Review. The planning advisory board shall review the proposed rezone as provided in ECDC 20.100.020. At least the following factors shall be considered in reviewing a proposed rezone: A. Comprehensive Plan. Whether the proposal is consistent with the comprehensive plan; B. Zoning Ordinance. Whether the proposal is consistent with the purposes of the zoning ordinance, and whether the proposal is consistent with the purposes of the proposed zone district; C. Surrounding Area. The relationship of the proposed zoning change to the existing land uses and zoning of surrounding or nearby property; D. Changes. Whether there has been sufficient change in the character of the immediate or surrounding area or in city policy to justify the rezone; E. Suitability. Whether the property is economically and physically suitable for the uses allowed under the existing zoning, and under the proposed zoning. One factor could be the length of time the property has remained undeveloped compared to the surrounding area, and parcels elsewhere with the same zoning; F. Value. The relative gain to the public health, safety and welfare compared to the potential increase or decrease in value to the property owners. 20.40.020 Contract rezones. An applicant may propose conditions to be imposed by contract on a rezone. If the applicant wishes to take this approach, the proposed conditions shall be reviewed at all public hearings on the rezone. 20.40.030 Notice. Notice of rezone hearings (and text change) before the planning board shall be the same as set forth for proposed amendments to the comprehensive plan in ECDC 20.00.020 for newspaper publication, and pursuant to ECDC 20.03.003. [Ord. 3817 § 11, 2010; Ord. 3736 § 56, 2009; Ord. 3112 § 14, 1996]. ATTACHMENT D 7.1.a Packet Pg. 376 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Staff Report with Attachments (Closed Record Review of Proposal to Rezone Property) 7/20/2018 Chapter 20.40 REZONES http://www.codepublishing.com/WA/Edmonds/2/2 The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code are current through Ordinance 4112, passed May 15, 2018. Disclaimer: The City Clerk's Office has the official version of the Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code. Users should contact the City Clerk's Office for ordinances passed subsequent to the ordinance cited above. 7.1.a Packet Pg. 377 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Staff Report with Attachments (Closed Record Review of Proposal to Rezone Property) 7/20/2018 Chapter 16.30 RM – MULTIPLE RESIDENTIAL http://www.codepublishing.com/WA/Edmonds/1/4 Chapter 16.30 RM – MULTIPLE RESIDENTIAL Sections: 16.30.000 Purposes. 16.30.010 Uses. 16.30.020 Subdistricts. 16.30.030 Site development standards. 16.30.040 Site development exceptions. 16.30.000 Purposes. The RM zone has the following specific purposes in addition to the general purposes for residential zones of ECDC 16.00.010 and 16.10.000: A. To reserve and regulate areas for a variety of housing types, and a range of greater densities than are available in the single-family residential zones, while still maintaining a residential environment; B. To provide for those additional uses which complement and are compatible with multiple residential uses. [Ord. 3943 § 2 (Exh. 1), 2013; Ord. 3627 § 1, 2007]. 16.30.010 Uses. A. Permitted Primary Uses. 1. Multiple dwellings; 2. Single-family dwellings; 3. Retirement homes or congregate care facilities, assisted living facilities; 4. Group homes for the disabled, foster family homes and state-licensed group homes for foster care of minors; provided, however, that halfway houses and group homes licensed for juvenile offenders are not permitted uses in a residential zone of the city; 5. Boarding houses and rooming houses; 6. Housing for low income elderly in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 20.25 ECDC; 7. Churches, subject to the requirements of ECDC 17.100.020; 8. Primary schools subject to the requirements of ECDC 17.100.050(G) through (R); 9. Local public facilities that are planned, designated, and sited in the capital improvement plan, subject to the requirements of ECDC 17.100.050; 10. Neighborhood parks, natural open spaces, and community parks with an adopted master plan subject to the requirements of ECDC 17.100.070. B. Permitted Secondary Uses. 1. All permitted secondary uses in the RS zone, if in conjunction with a single-family dwelling; 2. Home occupations, subject to the requirements of Chapter 20.20 ECDC; 3. The following accessory uses: ATTACHMENT E 7.1.a Packet Pg. 378 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Staff Report with Attachments (Closed Record Review of Proposal to Rezone Property) 7/20/2018 Chapter 16.30 RM – MULTIPLE RESIDENTIAL http://www.codepublishing.com/WA/Edmonds/2/4 a. Private parking, b. Private swimming pools and other private recreational facilities, c. Private greenhouses covering no more than five percent of the site in total; 4. Commuter parking lots containing less than 10 designated parking spaces in conjunction with a church, school, or local public facility allowed or conditionally permitted in this zone. Any additionally designated parking spaces that increase the total number of spaces in a commuter parking lot to 10 or more shall subject the entire commuter parking lot to a conditional use permit as specified in subsection (D)(2) of this section, including commuter parking lots that are located upon more than one lot as specified in ECDC 21.15.075. C. Primary Uses Requiring a Conditional Use Permit. 1. Offices, other than local public facilities; 2. Local public facilities not planned, designated, or sited in the capital improvement plan, subject to the requirements of ECDC 17.100.050; 3. Day-care centers and preschools for 13 or greater children; 4. Hospitals, convalescent homes, rest homes, sanitariums, and assisted living facilities; 5. Museums, art galleries, zoos, and aquariums of primarily local concern that do not meet the criteria for regional public facilities as defined in ECDC 21.85.033; 6. Counseling centers and residential treatment facilities for current alcoholics and drug abusers; 7. High schools, subject to the requirements of ECDC 17.100.050(G) through (R); 8. Regional parks and community parks without a master plan subject to the requirements of ECDC 17.100.070. D. Secondary Uses Requiring a Conditional Use Permit. 1. Day-care facilities or preschools of any size to be operated in a separate, nonresidential portion of a multifamily residential dwelling primary permitted structure operated primarily for the benefit of the residents thereof; 2. Commuter parking lots with 10 or more designated parking spaces in conjunction with a church, school, or local public facility allowed or conditionally permitted in this zone. [Ord. 3988 § 8, 2015; Ord. 3943 § 2 (Exh. 1), 2013; Ord. 3627 § 1, 2007]. 16.30.020 Subdistricts. There are established four subdistricts of the RM zone, in order to provide site development standards for areas which differ in topography, location, existing development and other factors. [Ord. 3943 § 2 (Exh. 1), 2013; Ord. 3627 § 1, 2007]. 16.30.030 Site development standards. A. Table. 7.1.a Packet Pg. 379 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Staff Report with Attachments (Closed Record Review of Proposal to Rezone Property) 7/20/2018 Chapter 16.30 RM – MULTIPLE RESIDENTIAL http://www.codepublishing.com/WA/Edmonds/3/4 Subdistrict Minimum Lot Area Per Dwelling Unit3 (Sq. Ft.) Minimum Street Setback2 Minimum Side Setback2 Minimum Rear Setback Maximum Height Maximum Coverage RM-1.5 1,500 15'10' 15'25'1 45% RM-EW 1,500 15'10' 15'25'4 45% RM-2.4 2,400 15'10' 15'25'1 45% RM-3 3,000 15'15' 15'25'1 45% 1 Roof only may extend five feet above the stated height limit if all portions of the roof above the stated height limit have a slope of four inches in 12 inches or greater. 2 RS setbacks may be used for single-family homes on lots of 10,000 square feet or less in all RM zones. 3 See definition of townhouse. 4 The maximum base height of any building fronting on Edmonds Way may be increased to 35 feet if the following apply to the site and proposed development: (a) At least two of the following techniques shall be incorporated into the building and/or site’s design: (1) Achievement of at least LEED gold certification or comparable green building certification; (2) Inclusion of housing units affordable to persons at low/moderate income as determined by Snohomish County Tomorrow. The number of affordable units must be at least 15 percent of the gross number of units proposed; (3) Low impact development (LID) techniques are employed. LID best management practices include, but are not limited to: bioretention/rain gardens, permeable pavements, roof downspout controls, dispersion, soil quality and depth, minimal excavation foundations, vegetated roofs, and water re-use. B. See Parking (Chapter 17.50 ECDC), Design Review (Chapter 20.10 ECDC), and Sign Code (Chapter 20.60 ECDC) for additional standards. The following design standards shall also apply to buildings within the RM-EW zone: 1. Seventy-five percent of a building facade facing a public right-of-way shall be clad with preferred building materials which include natural stone, wood, architectural metal, brick and glass. Concrete, laminates, veneers, fiber cement products and the like may be permitted if they replicate the appearance of the listed preferred materials. At least 55 percent of building facade materials must be salvaged, recycled content, bio- based or indigenous. C. Location of Parking. No parking spaces may be located within the street setback. [Ord. 3943 § 2 (Exh. 1), 2013; Ord. 3627 § 1, 2007]. 16.30.040 Site development exceptions. A. Maximum height for accessory structures is 15 feet. B. Satellite Television Antenna. Satellite television antennas shall be regulated as set forth in ECDC 16.20.050. C. Setback Encroachments. 1. Eaves and chimneys and bay windows, utility lines and meters, and “similar minor improvements,” etc., may project into a required setback not more than 30 inches. 7.1.a Packet Pg. 380 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Staff Report with Attachments (Closed Record Review of Proposal to Rezone Property) 7/20/2018 Chapter 16.30 RM – MULTIPLE RESIDENTIAL http://www.codepublishing.com/WA/Edmonds/4/4 2. Except as authorized by subsection (C)(3) of this section, uncovered and unenclosed porches, steps, patios, and decks may project into a required setback not more than one-third of the required setback, or four feet, whichever is less; provided, that they are no more than 30 inches above the ground level at any point. 3. In the RM – Edmonds Way zone, uncovered and unenclosed porches, steps, patios, and decks may occupy up to one-half of the required street setback area along Edmonds Way; provided, that these structures or uses are located no more than 20 feet above the ground level at any point. D. Corner Lots. Corner lots shall have no rear setback; all setbacks other than street setbacks shall be side setbacks. [Ord. 3943 § 2 (Exh. 1), 2013; Ord. 3652 § 1, 2007; Ord. 3627 § 1, 2007]. The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code are current through Ordinance 4112, passed May 15, 2018. Disclaimer: The City Clerk's Office has the official version of the Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code. Users should contact the City Clerk's Office for ordinances passed subsequent to the ordinance cited above. 7.1.a Packet Pg. 381 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Staff Report with Attachments (Closed Record Review of Proposal to Rezone Property) in PRD's near downtown and shopping centers as an alternative to 8.2 Multiple. The City's development policies encourage sustainable high quality site and building design to promote coordinated development and to preserve the trees, topography and other natural features of the site. Stereotyped, boxy multiple unit residential (RM) buildings are to be avoided. 8.2.a Location Policies. 8.2.a.i. RM uses should be located near arterial or collector streets. 8.2.b Compatibility Policies. B.2.b.i RM developments should preserve the privacy and view of surrounding buildings, wherever feasible. B.2.b.ii The height of RM buildings that abut single family residential (RS) zones shall be similar to the height permitted in the abutting RS zone except where the existing vegetation andlor change in topography can substantially screen one use from another' B.2.b.iiiThe design of RM buildings located next to RS zones should be similar to the design idiom of the single family residence. 8.2.c. General Design Policies. B.2.c.i The nonstructural elements of the building (such as decks, lights, rails, doors, windows and window easements, materials, textures and colors) should be coordinated to carry out a unified design concept. 8.2.c.ä Site and building plans should be designed to preserve the natural features (trees, streams, topography, etc.) of the site rather than forcing the site to meet the needs of the imposed plan. 8.3 Mobile Homes. Update design standards to ensure quality parks heavily landscaped both for screening exterior and for appearance of interior. CommercialLand Use Past and present commercial development in the City of Edmonds has been oriented ing the needs of its citizens. It also has attempted to offer a unique array ofSETV Milltown fype shopping opportunities for the public. In the downtown area, the is an excellent example of this type of development. lt is essential that continue to harmonize and enhance the residential small town strongly desire to retain. By the same token, the City should residents to help it grow and prosper while assisting future commercial deve character of Edmonds that its develop a partnership with business, to meet the various requirements of the City's policies. The Highway 99 arterial has been recognized historically as a community's tax and employment base. Its economic vitality is ial district which adds to the Land Use and should be 68 ATTACHMENT F 7.1.a Packet Pg. 382 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Staff Report with Attachments (Closed Record Review of Proposal to Rezone Property) EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL APPROVED MINUTES October 17,2017 The ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT Dave Earling, Mayor (arrived 9:00 p.m.) Thomas Mesaros, Council President Kristiana Johnson, Councilmember Michael Nelson, Councilmember Adrienne Fraley-Monillas, Councilmember Diane Buckshnis, Councilmember Dave Teitzel, Councilmember Neil Tibbott, Councilmember Council ,, City Clerk Scott Passey Earling. 3. APPROVALOFAGENDA COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY STAFF PRESENT S. Gagner, Police Officer Phil Williams, Public Works Director Shane Hope, Development Services Director Scott James, Finance Director Rob English, City Engineer Kernen Lien, Senior Planner Jeanie McConnell, Engineering Program Mgr. Brad Shipley, Associate Planner Jeff Taraday, City Attomey Scott Passey, City Clerk Jerrie Bevington, Camera Operator Jeannie Dines, Recorder MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER IN CONTENT AND ORDER. MOTION CARRIED 17 as Domestic Violence Violence in Edmonds. He Corporate Relations awareness ractsm, an Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes October 17,201'7 Page I CALL TO ORDER/FLAG SALUTE City Council meeting was called to order af 7:00 p.m.by Council President Mesaros in the 250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds. The meeting was opened with the flag salute. the roll. All elected officials were present with the exception of Mayor "ÎET"TZEL, TO APPROVE THE AG UNANIMOUSLY. 4. PRESENTATIONS I TIC Council President Mesaros read a proclamation proclaiming Awareness Month and the third week of October as YV/CA Week Wi presented the proclamation to YWCA Executive Director Mary Anne Officer Alicia Crank. On behalf of the YWCA, Ms. Dillon thanked the City Council and Mayor Earling for about domestic violence through this proclamation. The YWCA is on a mission to eli empower women, help families and strengthen communities. For more than 20 years, YWCAs the country have designated the third week of October as Week Without Violence. Domestic all-too-common thread in the lives of people the YMCA serves as well as neighbors, friends, relati ATTACHMENT G 7.1.a Packet Pg. 383 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Staff Report with Attachments (Closed Record Review of Proposal to Rezone Property) Taraday clarified the motion was to approve the ordinance in the packet and Councilmember Buckshnis was her intent U CALL, MOTION CARRIED (4-2-1), COUNCILMEMBERS FRALEY-MONILLAS' TEITZEL AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT MESAROS VOTING YES; COUNCILM NELSON AND TIBBOTT VOTING NOO AND COUNCILMEMBER JOHNSON ABST Council President Mesaros declared a Mayor Earling announced due to the late hour,would consider Agenda Items 8.2, 8.3 and 9.1 and the remaining agenda items would be continued to meeting. COUNCIL PRESIDENT MESAROS MOVED,BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO AMEND THE AGENDA TO CONSIDER ITEMS 8.2,8.3 AND 9.1 AND CONTINUE THE REMAINING ITEMS TO A FUTURE MEE (6-1), COUNCTLMEMBER JOHNSON VOTING NO. OTION CARRIED COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY-MONILLAS MOVED, SECONDED BY CO BUCKSHNIS, TO EXTEND THE MEETING UNTIL 10:30 P.M. MOTION COUNCILMEMBER JOHNSON VOTING NO. PLANNING BOARD RECOMMENDATION TO CHANGE THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION FOR PROPERTIES AT 9111 AND 9107-236TH ST. SW FROM SINGLE FAMILY URBAN I ISFU1I TO EDMONDS WAY CORRIDOR (E\A/C) Associate Planner Brad Shipley reviewed:. Process: Type V Legislative Actiono Applicationo Public hearing before Planning Board o Public hearing before City Council o City Council takes action on all Comprehensive Plan amendments collectively o If Comprehensive Plan amendment is approved, applicant may submit for a rezone to a compatible zoning classifi cation. Aerial map of subject site - 2361h St SW & Edmonds Way, between Edmonds Way and Madrona Schoolo History: o Currently developed with a SFR and legal, non-conforming multi-family residence o 9107 236th St. SW Developed in 1960 o 91 1 1 236th St. SW Developed in 1958 and 1970 o Parcels were annexed into the City in 1997 . Proposal o Change Comp Plan designation from Single Family Urban 1 to Edmonds Way Conidor o If a change to the Comp Plan designation is approved, the applicant indicated that they would seek a rezone to RM-l.5 Comprehensive Plan Designation Land Use Tvne Compatible Zoning ClassifÏcations Edmonds Way Corridor Commercial BP, BN, BC or other similar commercial zone; RM Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes October 17,2017 Page20 ) 7.1.a Packet Pg. 384 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Staff Report with Attachments (Closed Record Review of Proposal to Rezone Property) . Planning Board reviewed the criteria on April 26,2017 and made the recommendation to approve the proposed Comp Plan amendment. r Today, we are seeking approval to continue with the process with the understanding that final approval will occur al alater da|e. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas said Ms. Hope had answered all her questions. Councilmember Tibbott asked how many parcels would be allowed if the property were rezoned to RM 1.5. Mr. Shipley said RM 1.5 allows I unit for every 1,500 square feet of lot area so approximately 21 units would be allowed. Councilmember Tibbott commented 21 units appeared to be compatible with other multifamily in the area. Mr. Shipley agreed there was multifamily development on three sides and one of the sites is currently developed multifamily although it is a legal non-conforming building. Councilmember Tibbott expressed support for changing the Comprehensive Plan designation. COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER NELSON, TO APPROVAL CHANGING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION FOR PROPERTIES AT 9111 AND 9107-236TH ST. SW FROM SINGLE FAMILY URBAN 1 (SFUI) TO EDMONDS WAY CORRIDOR (EWC). MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 3.FISHING PIER REHABILITATION PROJECT Rob English explained this is a request for additional funding for the fishing pier. It wasCity Parks, Planning & Public Works Committee who recommended it be presented to the full Council. The ect began in spring 2016, fhe bulk of the improvements were built between spring and December.were made to the top of the pier deck (shelters, railing, benches, lighting and other amenities) as as structural repairs to the underside of the pier structure. In May 2016, sfaff requested additional due to the condition of the edge on both sides of the pier. He displayed photographs ofthe crete and rebar, described the edge repair and displayed a photograph ofthe alternate edge repair. The oint repairs met contract requirements. This funding request is related to the repairs. He displayed a cross-section of the pier illustrating the two piers coming out of the water at an a pile cap on top with two T-cross sections on the pile capfhatabut to ajoint in the center ofthe pier thatjoint was part ofthe contract and the contractor attempted to make those repairs. He displayed a of the demolition of the existing concrete and prepped for the new concrete patch. The contractor woul have placed a form board under the pier and bottom and poured high strength concrete through bored the void. He displayed a photograph of the finished product showing the deficient center joint repair bond strenglh testing, the first pier bay passed but all subsequent pier bays failed the bond strength the bond strength test. Mr. English reviewed:r Constructiontimeline of 12 Tofal bays, only #3 passed o Contractor's submittal is currently being reviewed. One of the advantages is it would be a much quicker repair than removing the concrete patch. Likely the contractor will do one pier bay and Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes October 17,2017 Page 2l ContractawardedfoRazzConstruction \Feb 2016 NTP providedtoRazz \March2016 Edge repairs unforeseen condition \April2016 repairs completed, center ioint repairs cofuetedAlternate edgeMay-August 2016 Contractor notified of failed tests on center ioint \August & September Aue-Dec 2016 Contractor completes remaining improvements =R Iulv 2017 Razz remobilized onsite July & Sept 2017 Razz performs testing on center.ioint repairs Oct2017 Razz submits epoxy iniection submittal 7.1.a Packet Pg. 385 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Staff Report with Attachments (Closed Record Review of Proposal to Rezone Property) MEMORANDUM Date To: From July 10,2018 Brad Shipley, Associate Planner Jeanie McConnell, Engineering Program Manager Bertrand Hauss, Transportation Engineer Subject:PLN20160044 - Rezone from RS-8 to RM-1.5 Fraser Fir Tree, LLC and Pinewood Mgmt 9107 and 9ll3 236th St S\il Engineering has reviewed the subject application and found the information provided is consistent with Title 18 Edmonds Community Development Code & Engineering standards It is requested that the following be included as a condition of project approval. A tranpsortation analysis shall be completed, as required, with future development of the property. Thank you. City of Edmonds ATTACHMENT H 7.1.a Packet Pg. 386 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Staff Report with Attachments (Closed Record Review of Proposal to Rezone Property) CITY OFEDMONDS L21.1'IIJAVENUE NORTH, EDMONDS, WA 98020 (425) 77L-0220 RCW 197-11-965 Adoption Notice ADOPTION OF EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT -t Adoption of (check appropriate box) El lNs E Bls tr Descriptionofcurrentp¡spe5¿l: Rezonetwoparcels(9107and9111-236thSt.SW)fromSingleFamilY IRS-8ì to Multi-fa lv lRfvl-1 5ì Frasier Fir c &Pinewood ManL LLCProponent: Location ofproposal, including street address ifany:9107 and 911 I - 236rh St. SW. Edmonds,WA Title of document being adopted: Pineqrove Properties Rezone and Comprehensive Plan Amendment Environmental Checklist and DNS Agency that prepared document being adopted: Pine Wood Manaqement, LLC (rep. Martin Riemers) Date adopted document was prepared: July 2S, 2016 (checklist) and September '1 I , 2017 (DNS) Description of document (or portion) being adopted: Environmental determination for the Comprehensive Plan amendment associated with the same site (file 4MD20160008). There will be no additional environmental i from rezonino the site. If the document being adopted has been challenged (WAC 197-11-630), please describe: The Pineqrove Properties Rezone and Comprehensive Plan Amendment DNS not timelv aooealed. The document is available to be read at (place/time;: The document is available on the Citv's website (file PLN20160044) and for review during business hours at the Development Services permit counter, 2nd Floor, City Hall, 121 Sth Ave. N, Edmonds. Vy'e have identified and adopted this document as being appropriate for this proposal after independent review' The document meets our environmental review needs for the current proposal and will accompany the proposal to the decision maker. Name of agency adopting document: Citv of Edmonds Contact person, ifother than responsible official:ner Rob ChaveResponsible official: Date 425.0220 121 WA wAc (4/15/98) ATTACHMENT I 7.1.a Packet Pg. 387 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Staff Report with Attachments (Closed Record Review of Proposal to Rezone Property) ;¿ STATE OF WASHINGTOITI ÐEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 1011 Ptum s¡reel Sf . PA Box 12525 . O¡ympia, WaslingÍon 9e5tut-2525 . {360} 725'400t www,ç o m m erc g,19â, grov May 15,2018 Robert Chave Planning Manager City of Edmonds 121 - 5lh Avenue North Edmonds, Washington 98020 Dear Mr. Chave: Thank you for sending the Washington State Department of Commerce (Commerce) the following materials as required under RCW 36.704.106. Please keep this letter as documentation that you have met this procedural requirement. City of Edmonds - Proposed text amendments to the comprehensive plan to reference adopted Highway 99 subarea plan. These materials were received on May 11,2018 and processed with the Material lD # 24916. We have forwarded a copy of this notice to other state agencies. lf this submitted material is an adopted amendment, then please keep this letter as documentation that you have met the procedural requirement under RCW 36.704.106. lf you have submitted this material as a draft amendment, then final adoption may occur no earlier than sixty days following the date of receipt by Commerce. Please remember to submit the final adoþted amendment to Commerce within ten days of adoption. lf you have any questions, please contact Growth Management Services at reviewteam@commerce.wa.gov, or call Dave Andersen (509) 434-4491 or Paul Johnson (360) 725-3048. Sincerely, Review Team Growth Management Services 7.1.a Packet Pg. 388 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Staff Report with Attachments (Closed Record Review of Proposal to Rezone Property) CITY OF EDMONDS 121 sTH AVENUE NORTH, EDMONDS, WA 98020 (4251771-0220 WAC 197-11-970 Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Description of proposal: Application for a 'Type V' Comprehensive Plan amendment for a proposed change in plan map designation from'Single Family Urban 1'to'Edmonds Way Corridor'for two nronerties located in fhe Sinole Familv Residential Tone IRS-81 A nublic hearino is schedLrled brefore ther.-rv'.J,-._..._\.._-l'..r-...'-..--.....9.--. City Council on 1010312017. Proponent: Fraser Fir Tree, LLC and Pinewood Management, LLC Location of proposal, including street address if any: 9107 and 9111 2361h Street SW, Edmonds, WA Tax Parcel Numbers: 00555300100104 (91 1 1), 00555300100102 (9107) Lead agency: City of Edmonds The lead agency has determined that the requirements for environmental analysis and protection have been adequately addressed in the development regulations and comprehensive plan adopted under chapter 36.70A RCW, and in other applicable local, state, or federal laws or rules, as provided by RCW 43.21C.240 and WAC 197-11-158 and/or mitigating measures have been applied that ensure no significant adverse impacts will be created. An environmental impact statement is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. There is no comment period for this DNS. XX This DNS is issued under 197-11-3a0Q); the lead agency will not act on this proposalfor 14 days from the date below. Comments must be submitted by 912612Ù'17. Project Planner: Brad Shipley, Associate Planner Responsible Official; Rob Chave, Planning Manager Contact lnformation: City of Edmonds | 121 1lh Avenue North, Edmonds WA 98020 | 425-771-0220 Date '1 -\'17 Signature: XX You may appeal this determination to Robert Chave, Planning Manager, at 121 5th Avenue North, Edmonds, WA 98020, by filing a written appeal citing the specific reasons for the appeal with the required appeal fee, adjacent property owners list and notarized affidavit form no later than 1010212017. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact Rob Chave to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. XX Posted on 911112017, at the Edmonds Public Library and Edmonds Public Safety Building. Published in the Everett Herald. Emailed to the Department of Ecology SEPA Center (SEPAunit@ecv.wa.gov). Mailed to property owners within 300 feet of the site. XX Distribute to "Checked" Agencies below. The SEPA Checklist, project plans, location map, and DNS are available at https://permits.edmonds.wa.us/citizen. Search for file number PLN20160008. These materials are also available for viewing at the Planning Division - located on the second floor of City Hall: 121 lth Avenue North, Edmonds WA 98020. SEPA DETERMINATION 9/8/] 7 SEPA Page I of2 ATTACHMENT J 7.1.a Packet Pg. 389 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Staff Report with Attachments (Closed Record Review of Proposal to Rezone Property) Notice Mailed to the following XX Environmental Review Section Department of Ecology P.O. Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 Email: SEPAunit@ecv.wa.qov COMCAST Outsideplant Engineer, North Region 152575"' St. SW Ste 200 Everett, WA 98203 DNR SEPA Center P.O. Box 47015 Olympia, WA 98504-7015 SEPACENTER@DN R.WA.GOV Tulalip Tribal Council 6700 Totem Beach Road Marysville, WA 98270 XX XX XX Community Transit Attn.: Kate Tourtellot 7100 Hardeson Road Everett, WA 98203 xx Olvmoic View Water & Sewer District 8128'228'," St. SW Edmonds, WA 98026 XX Puget Sound Energy Attn: David Matulich PO Box 97034, M/S BOT-1G Bellevue, WA 98009-9734 david. matulich@pse.com XX Applicant: Martin Reimers 1712Pacific Ave., Suite 107 XX Attachments xx Everett, WA 98201 Department of Archology & Historic Preservation P.O. Box 48343 Olympia, WA 98290 Kristin@futurewise. org XX XX Seattle District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers P.O. Box 3755 Seattle, WA 98124-3755 Snohomish County Fire District No. I Headquarters Station No. 1 Attn.: Director of Fire Services 12310 Meridian Avenue South Everett, WA 98208-5764 pc File No.4MD20160008 SEPA Notebook SEPA DETERMINATION 9/8/1 7.SEPA Page2 of2 7.1.a Packet Pg. 390 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Staff Report with Attachments (Closed Record Review of Proposal to Rezone Property) Everett Daily Herald Affïdavit of Publication State of Washington ) County of Snohomish ì ss Dicy Sheppard being first duly sworn, upon oath deposes and says: that he/she is the legal representative of the Everett Daily Herald a daily newspaper. The said newspaper is a legal newspaper by order of the superior court in the county in which it is published and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of the first publication of the Notice hereinafter referred to, published in the English language continually as a daily newspaper in Snohomish County, Washington and is and always has been printed in whole or part in the Everett Daily Herald and is of general circulation in said County, and is a legal newspaper, in accordance with the Chapter 99 of the Laws of 1921, as amended by Chapter 213, Laws of 1941, and approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of Snohomish County, State of Washington, by order dated June 16, 1941, and that the annexed is a true copy of EDH7765I8 SEPA DNS as it was published in the regular and entire issue of said paper and not as a supplement form thereof for a period of I issue(s), such publication commencing on 0911112017 and ending on 09117/2017 and that said newspaper was regularly distributed to its subscribers during all ofsaid period. The amount of the fee for such publication is $53.32. Subscribed and sworn me on thislzday of ^2zz Washington. City ofEdñonds - LBCAL ADS | 14101416 BRAD SHIPLEY Public in and for the State of Linda philtips Nolary pubtic State of Washinoton My Appornùnent E xpuesóar29t2ozt 7.1.a Packet Pg. 391 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Staff Report with Attachments (Closed Record Review of Proposal to Rezone Property) lrom plica on 'Typ€ V'Plan map 'Fdmonds a NOTICE OF NOTTCE lS a P ROJ DNS PROJECT 91 07 and 91 | TAX PARCEL 00555300100 SEPA Search SW Edmonds, WA 00555300100102 (9107) SÉPA Fâmlly belore and DNS arg Onl¡nô a also availåblesocond floor wA 98020.crw coNTAcl:Brad Shiplêy, Associâte Planner brad.Fhþley@ edmondsa.gov 425-771.0220 S€pt€mb€r 1'1, 2017. 8DH776518 þv 7.1.a Packet Pg. 392 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Staff Report with Attachments (Closed Record Review of Proposal to Rezone Property) STATE OF WASHI}¡GTOI{ DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE l0ll Ptum S¡reetSE . POBox12525 . Olympia, t!Ácsr|tE[oil 9850ct-2525 ' $6A)72540Ü0 $nþ.cofitnerca,w8.gev October 25,2017 Robert Chave Planning Manager City of Edmonds 121 - 5th Avenue North Edmonds, Washington 98020 Dear Mr. Chave: Thank you for sending the Washington State Department of Commerce (Commerce) the following materials as requireâ under RCWã6.704.106. Þlease keep this letter as documentation that you have met this procedural requirement. City of Edmonds - Proposed comprehensive plan amendment to change land use designation from Single Family Urban f (SFUf ) to Edmonds Way Corridor (EWC) to allow for a future proposalto cnange the ioning. The site is located at 9111 & 9107 236th St. SW, Edmonds. These materials were received on October 20,2017 and processed with the Material lD # 24268. We have forwarded a copy of this notice to other state agencies' lf this submitted mate¡al is an adopted amendment, then please keep this letter as documentation that you have met the procedural requirement under RCW 36.704.106' lf you have submitted this material as a draft amendment, then final adoption may occur no earlier than sixty dãys following the date of receipt by Commerce. Please remember to submit the final adopted amendment to Commerce within ten days of adoption. lf you have any questions, please contact Growth Management services at reiiewteam@ðommerce.wa.gov, or call Dave Andersen (509) 434-4491 or Paul Johnson (360) 725-3048 Sincerely, Review Team Growth Management Services 7.1.a Packet Pg. 393 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Staff Report with Attachments (Closed Record Review of Proposal to Rezone Property) Department of Commerce lnnovation is in our nature, Notice of lntent to Adopt Amendment 60 Days Prior to Adoption lndicate one (or both, if applicable) Itr Gomprehensive Plan Amendment Development Regulation Amendment Pursuant to RCW 36.704.106, the following jurisdiction provides notice of intent to adopt a proposed comprehensive plan amendment and/or development regulation amendment under the Growth Management Act. REQUIRED: Attach or include a copy of the proposed amendment text or document(s). We do not accept a website hyperlink requiring us to retrieve external documents. Jurisdictions must submit the actual document(s) to Gommerce. lf you experience difficulty, please contact reviewteam(Ocommerce.wa.oov. Jurisdiction:City of Edmonds Mailing Address:121 5Ïn Ave. N., Edmonds, WA 98020 Date:October 20,2017 Contact Name:Rob Chave Title/Position:Planning Manager Phone Number:425.771.0220 E-mail Address:Rob. chave@ed mondswa. g ov Brief Description of the Proposed/Draft Amendment: lf this draft amendment is provided to supplement an existing 60-day notice already submitted, then please provide the date the original notice was submitted and the Commerce Material lD number located in your Commerce acknowledge ment I etter. Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment to change land use designation from Single Family Urban 1 (SFU1) to Edmonds Way Corridor (EWC) to allow for a future proposal to change the zoning. The site is located at 9111 & 91 07 236tn St. SW, Edmonds. ls this action part of the scheduled review and update? GMA requires review every I years u nder RCW 36.7 0A. 1 30 (4)-ß). Yes: No: X Public Hearing Date:Plann ing Board/Commission Cou ncil/County Commission April 26, 2017 December 2017 Proposed Adoption Date:December 2017 Rev 03/2015 7.1.a Packet Pg. 394 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Staff Report with Attachments (Closed Record Review of Proposal to Rezone Property) #P7I T:..:rzq¡,ro*,*ír!J, ED CITY OF EDMONDS ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Purpose of Checklisl: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43,21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identi$' impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Inslructions fo r Ap p lícants : This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. Ifyou have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Use of checklìstfor nonprojecl proposals: For nonproject proposals complete this checklist and the supplemental sheet for nonproject actions (Part D). the leasd ageîcy may exclude any question for the environmental elements (Part B) which they determine do not contribute meaningfully to the analysis of the proposalFor nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND l. Name of proposed project, if applicablez Pinegrove Properties Rezone and Comprehensive Plan Amendment- Name of applicant: Pine L\/ood Manqgemen¿ LLC - Alan .1zo Address and phone number ofapplicant and contact person: 0to ¿61) .t ,, 3. Annli¡:nnt - Álnn ,\ze 41f ,1nraque St ErJm.onrJs WA - 206 Contact - Martin Reímers. AIA. Concent Architecture. I7l2 Pacifìc Ave. Suite 107. Everett. WA 98201 4. Date checklist prepared :7/25/2016 5. Agency requesting checklist: Ciry o.f Edmonds Raidon4/1U14 P7 1 _-_EPA_C\æ\d i d Pi nqrove Pagel of27 7.1.a Packet Pg. 395 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Staff Report with Attachments (Closed Record Review of Proposal to Rezone Property) 7 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable 'We orooose to comolete the re-zone and bv October 20rc if le. (STAFF Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? Ifyes, explain. None at this time. 8. Nn pnttìrnnmenlnl (STAFFCOMMENT$ lê *PPa..oueD | fl lz&o¡ø. t^tsu¿-ù &- ßæ&,"trze¡ List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. 9. (STAFF Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? Ifyes, explain. Nnne knnwn (srAFF coMMENrSl NON€ Ratiæd on 41Y14 P7 1 _- _EPA_Chækl ¡ g Pi nqr ove Page2 of 27 7.1.a Packet Pg. 396 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Staff Report with Attachments (Closed Record Review of Proposal to Rezone Property) 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposalo if known. Reznne and enqiwc Þlan A menr{menf 12. ll. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. The proiect includes the rezone of 2 lots from single famil)¡ zoning (RS-8) to Multifamily Housing (RMl.51. (srAFF'rnunT t (srAFF COMMENT s) I Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide legal description, site plan' vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The proiect is located at 9107 and 9l I I 236th Sheet SW. Edmonds. WA Secfinn ?1 Townshin 27,oeO4 NW% /(STAFF TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a.General description of the site (circle one): FIat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other Rwidon 41914 Genflv slonins P7 1 --_æPA_C\æ\d i É Pi nqrove Page3 of 27 7.1.a Packet Pg. 397 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Staff Report with Attachments (Closed Record Review of Proposal to Rezone Property) (STAFF b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? on is annrox. l3%oThe site slooes stentlv to the east. The steenest (STAFF c.What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sando gravel, peat, and muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any agricultural land of longterm commercial significance and whether the proposal results in removing any of these soils. Alderwood Urban Land Complex is the soil type of the site. This classification taken from the USGS Soil Data (STAFF d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so' describe.- No rrnsfahle soils are evl nn cife nr in the immediafe vicinifv e. (STAFF ,/ Describe the purpose, type, total area and approximate quantities and total affected area of any filling, excayation, and grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. No eradine or land disturbance are orooosed with this (STAFF f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. is nronosed- Rwiæd on 4/1914 No erosion can occur as no P7 1 _-_æPA_C\æ\4 i É Pi nqrove Page4 of 27 7.1.a Packet Pg. 398 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Staff Report with Attachments (Closed Record Review of Proposal to Rezone Property) g. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, ifany: None neerled About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? The site is fullv looed. No chanses to impervious nrooosed. (srAFF COMMENTS) t/ (srAFF COMMENTS) V/ (STAFF CO 2. AIR â.What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, and industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any' generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. No chanses nronosed-qite h¡q nrfo narkins for resiriential use. (STAFF b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may effect your proposal? If so, generally describe. None (STAFF c.Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to the, if any: Ratigd on 4/1914 None nronoserl P7 1 _-_SEPA_Chd<l i É Pi nqrove Page 5 of 27 7.1.a Packet Pg. 399 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Staff Report with Attachments (Closed Record Review of Proposal to Rezone Property) (STAFF 3. WATER a. Surface: (1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, and wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. Nn qrrrfnce water is locafed in the immediate vicinifu- (STAFF CO (2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No (srAFF CO (3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. 0- No eadhwork nronosed. (STAFF COMMENTÐ y' (4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No / Reu'ædon 4M4 (STAFF P7 1 _-_æPA_Chdd i É Pi nqrove Page6 of 27 7.1.a Packet Pg. 400 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Staff Report with Attachments (Closed Record Review of Proposal to Rezone Property) (s)Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No The nroiect is nof in fhe floodnlane. (STAFF COMMENTS) (6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If soo describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. (srAFF COMMENTS) y' b. Ground: (1) \ilill ground water be withdrawn from a well for drinking water or other purposes? If so, give a general description of the well, proposed uses and approximate quantities withdrawn from the well Will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No well is oroposed. Citv water is alreadv on site. (STAFF (2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serye. No waste material will be dischareed into a seotic svstem. Sewer is available and in use. Reviú on 4/1914 (STAFF P7 1 _--æPA_Çhæ14 i I Pi nqrove Page7 of 27 7.1.a Packet Pg. 401 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Staff Report with Attachments (Closed Record Review of Proposal to Rezone Property) c.Water Runoff (including storm water): (1)Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal' if any (include quantities, if known). Where wilt this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. The existing site includes roof and drivewa)¡ and flalwork runoff. The roof runoff is collected in gutters and riirected to the with rtownsnouts. (STAFF (2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No waste materials are currentl)¡ able to enter surface waters and no change to this will occur with the proiecL- (srAFF CO (3) Does the proposal alter or otherwise affect drainage patterns in the vicinityof the site? If so, describe. No chanses are fo the tonosraohv or svsfem. (STAFF CO d Proposed measures to reduce or control surfaceo ground, runoff water, and drainage pattern impacts' if any: No mor{ificafions The site is firllv develoned. (STAFF 4. Plants Ratisd on 4/1914 P7 1 _- _æPA_Chd4 i É Pi nq rove Page I of 27 7.1.a Packet Pg. 402 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Staff Report with Attachments (Closed Record Review of Proposal to Rezone Property) a.Check or circle types ofvegetation found on the site: Xdeciduoustree:alder,mapleoaspen'other: X evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other: X shrubs X grass - pasture crop or graln Orchards,vineyardsorotherpermanentcrops wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage' other: water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other: other types of vegetation: (STAFF b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? No chanses oronosed to on site. (STAFF COMMENTS) ^rollg t,Jrf 4 'l nrS P¡rsflr¡^Êr- Raiædon 41Y14 P7 1 _-_æPA_Chdd i É Pi nqrove Page9 of 27 7.1.a Packet Pg. 403 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Staff Report with Attachments (Closed Record Review of Proposal to Rezone Property) c.List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Nnne knnwn (STAFF COMMENTS),/ Proposed landscaping, use ofnative plants, or other materials to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: No landscanins nronosed. d. e. (STAFF COMMENTS) y' List all noxious \ryeeds and invasive species known to be on or near the site. None known. (srAFF coMMENrÐ Ep {*Lt 5¡f nl'/ 5. Animals a.List any birds and other animals that have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site. Examples include: birds: hawþ heron, eagle, songbirds, other: small birds mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other:none fÏsh: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other:none Roìdon4/1Y14 P71 - æPA ChækliÉ Pinqrove Page 10 of 27 7.1.a Packet Pg. 404 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Staff Report with Attachments (Closed Record Review of Proposal to Rezone Property) (srAFF COMMENTS) b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known (STAFF c.Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. None known. (STAFF CO d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife' if any: No measrrres (STAFF e.List any invasive animal species known to be on or near the site. None known. tutlædon 4/1114 ISTAF'F'COMMENTSI ,/ P7 1 _-_æPA_Chdd i É Pi nqrove Page11 of27 7.1.a Packet Pg. 405 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Staff Report with Attachments (Closed Record Review of Proposal to Rezone Property) 6.Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Project ah'ead)¡ serviced with electrical" natural gas for heat. power and lights. No changes to energv needs oroposed or as Dart ofthe proposed proiect. (srAFF b.IVould your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. NO No nhvsical chanses to the qife are nronosed c. (STAFF What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts' if any: No new conservation nronoserl. (STAFF 7. EnvironmentalHealth a.Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result ofthis proposal? Ifso describe. Re,tidon41g14 No. No changes to site P7 1 _-_æPA_Chdd i S Pi nqrove Page 12 of 27 7.1.a Packet Pg. 406 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Staff Report with Attachments (Closed Record Review of Proposal to Rezone Property) (STAFF (l) Describe any known or possible contamination at the site from present or past uses. None known (STAFF (2) Describe existing hazardous chemicals/conditions that might affect project development and design. This includes undergrand hazardous liquid and gas transmission pipelines located within the project area and in the vicinity. No such conditions are known to exist. (STAFF (3) Describe any toxic or hazardous chemicals that might be stored, used, or produced during the project's development or constructions, or at any time during the operating life of the project. No nroiect develonment or construction orooosed. (STAFF / (4) Describe special emergency services that might be required Onlv normal public services needed which are already nrovided. Revidon4/1914 (STAFF P7 1 _-_æPA_Chdd i É Pi nqrove Page 13 of 27 7.1.a Packet Pg. 407 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Staff Report with Attachments (Closed Record Review of Proposal to Rezone Property) (S) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, ifany: I health hazards exisfNn new meâslres cre nrnnnqed Nn knnwn (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Noise (1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffÏc, equipment, operation, other)? Reqrl¡r fraffic n se eviqfs /(STAFF (Z) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hour's noise would come from the site, Nn ch¡nses fo noise levels nrnnnccd (STAFF (3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None. No noise tuvidon4/1914 (srAFF P7 1 _-_æPA_Chdd i É Pi nqrove Page 14 of 27 7.1.a Packet Pg. 408 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Staff Report with Attachments (Closed Record Review of Proposal to Rezone Property) 8. Land and Shoreline Use What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Will the proposal affect current land uses on nearby or adjacent properties? Ifso, describe. Sinqle familv and Iti-famìlv ìrses âre adiacent to the (STAFF b.Has the project site been used as working farmlands or working forest lands? If so, describe. How much agricultural or forest land of long-term commercial significance will be converted to other uses as a result oi th" proposal, if any? If resource lands have not been designated, how many acres in farmland or forest land tax status will be converted to nonfrom or nonforest use? No. The site has been used as a farm or working a. (STAFF (1) Will the proposal affect or be affected by surrounding working farm or forest land normal business operations, such as oversize equipment access, the application ofpesticides, tilling, and harvesting? If so, how: Nof af all. No qntronndins rrses exl'st. (srAFF coMMENrs) y' c.Describe any structures on the site. 9107 - Sinsle lv Residence Slll-Multi-F Residential Ruildinps. Rettiúonqlil4 (STAFF P7 1 _-_SEPA_C\æ\{ i É Pi nqrove Page 15 of 27 7.1.a Packet Pg. 409 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Staff Report with Attachments (Closed Record Review of Proposal to Rezone Property) d. Will any structures be demolished? If so' what? No No sfnrchrre chanses (STAFF e.What is the current zoning classification of the site? RS-R - Sinole F'nmilv (STAFFCOMMENTS) t/ f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Sinsle Familv Urban 1 (STAFF g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline mâster plan designation of the site? N/A (STAFF h.Has any part of the site been classified critical area by the city? If so, specify Not to our knowledee. Revid on 4/1914 (srAFF P7 1 _-_æPA_C\æ\4 i ú Pi nqrove Page 16 of 27 7.1.a Packet Pg. 410 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Staff Report with Attachments (Closed Record Review of Proposal to Rezone Property) l.Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Nn nhenoe fn evist Crrrrenflv ânnrô.l¿ R rnits nhrs .l unif (STAFF',CO j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None (STAFF k.Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None Needed. (STAFF t.Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible \ilith existing and projected land uses and plansn if any: The proposal is consistent with existing uses as the sitp is surrounded on 3 sides by multi-family zoned land. (STAFF Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with nearby agricultural and forest lands of long- term commercial significance, if any: None nearby. No measures proposed. m. tuvidon4/1914 (STAFF CO P7 1 _-_gPA_Chd4 i É Pi nqrove Page 17 of 27 7.1.a Packet Pg. 411 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Staff Report with Attachments (Closed Record Review of Proposal to Rezone Property) 9. Housing a.Approximately how many units would be providedo if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Nn chanoeq to evisfino nronoserl (STAFF CO Approximately how many units, if any would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. No chanses to exist. Prooosed. (STAFF CO b. c.Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: Prooosal does not impact existine conditions. (srAFF CO 10. Aesthetics a.What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principle exterior building material(s) proposed? No consfnrction nronosed, / Reviæd on 4/1914 (STAFF P7 1 _-_æPA_Chdd i É Pi nqrove Page 18 of 27 7.1.a Packet Pg. 412 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Staff Report with Attachments (Closed Record Review of Proposal to Rezone Property) b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None No nronoseri (STAFF COMMENTS) c.Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts' if any: No construction is orooosed so nô meâsrìres nronosed. (srAFF 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? No chanse to existine s. (STAFF b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No (STAFF CO c.What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None. All neishborins es are develoned and no oroblems exist. Re"tid on 4/1914 (STAFF P7 1 _-_æPA_Chd4 i É Pi nqrove Page 19 of 27 7.1.a Packet Pg. 413 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Staff Report with Attachments (Closed Record Review of Proposal to Rezone Property) d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: No measures nrooosed. (STAFF 12. Recreation a,What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? None known. (STAFF b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreation uses? If so, describe. No. c.Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant' if any: No measures as no imnacts anticinated. (srAFF COMMENT S) t/ Røtisd on 4/1114 (STAFF P7 1 _-_æPA-Chdd i É Pi nqrove Page21 of 27 7.1.a Packet Pg. 414 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Staff Report with Attachments (Closed Record Review of Proposal to Rezone Property) 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation Are there any buildings, structures, or sites located on or near the site that are over 45 years old listed in, or eligible for listing in national, state, or local preservation registers located on or near the site? If so' specifically describe. No historical ss on site. (STAFF CO b.Are there any landmarks, features, or other evidence of Indian or historic use or occupation? This may include human burials or old cemeteries. Are there any material evidence, artifacts, or areas of cultural importance on or near the site? Please list any professional studies conducted at the site to identify such resources. Nnne known The site is fir r¡ r{er¡elonerì nnrl locaferl in nn exisfinq neishhorhood- a. c. (STAFF Describe the methods used to assess the potential impacts to cultural and historic resources on or near the project site. Examples include consultation with tribes and the Department of Archeology and Historic Preservation, archaeological surveys, historic maps' GIS date' etc. No assessment of alreadv loned site was conducted. d. (STAFF Proposed measures to avoid, minimize, or compensate for loss, changes to, and disturbance to resources. Please include plans for the above and any permits that may be required. No chanses to site therefore ncì resources can be affected. Ralædon 4/1914 (STAFF P7 1 _-_æPA*Chdd i ú Pi nqrove Page21 of27 7.1.a Packet Pg. 415 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Staff Report with Attachments (Closed Record Review of Proposal to Rezone Property) 14. Transportation a.Identify public streets and highways serving the site or affected geographic area, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The site is accessed b], 236th St. SV/ y¡hich intersects Edmonds way which is also State Hwy.l04. Edmonds Way leads to T-5 (STAFF CO Is the site or affected geographic area currently served by public transit? If so, generally describe. If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? (srAFF b. c. 41 .t-ã\ How many additional parking spaces would the completed project or nonproject proposal have? How many would the project or proposal eliminate? Existing parking totals approx. 15 spaces. None will be added or eliminated with this project. (STAFF COMMENTS d.Will the proposal require any new or improvements to existing roads, streets, pedestrian, bicycle or state transportation facilityes not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No improvements needed. ReviØ on 4/1914 P7 1 _-_æPA_Chækl i í Pi nqrove Page22 of 27 7.1.a Packet Pg. 416 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Staff Report with Attachments (Closed Record Review of Proposal to Rezone Property) (srAFF COMMENTS) / , e. f. Will the project or proposal use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail' or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. The proj.ect will not use nor is in the vicinity of air hansport. Rail and Water transport are available in downtown Edmonds. Our project will not use these per se' (STAFF How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur and what percentage of the volume would be trucks (such as commercial and anpassenger vehicles). What data or transporation models were used to make these estimates? No chnnse fo hâffeñrq will resrlf íÌom fhis nroiect-Nrmher of crrrrenf trins are unknown g. (STAFF Will the proposal interfere with, affect or be affected by the movement of agricultural and forest products on roads or streets in the area? Ifso, generally describe. Not at all. (STAFF h. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: nre anticinafed-- Rs/id on 4/1914 No transnofiation P7 1 _-_æPA_Chd<l i ú Pi nqrove Paç23 of 27 7.1.a Packet Pg. 417 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Staff Report with Attachments (Closed Record Review of Proposal to Rezone Property) (STAFF 15. Public Services a,Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, public transit, health care, schools, other)? Ifso, generally describe. No. There will be chanøe in need for nublic services. (STAFF CO b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any: None oroposed. (STAFF 16. Utilities a.Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, \ryater, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other: F.lecfricifv. Gas. W'ater-Phone and Sewer are availahle to the site. Revid on 4/1914 (STAFF P71 -,æPA_Chækl i d Pi nqrove Page24 of 27 7.1.a Packet Pg. 418 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Staff Report with Attachments (Closed Record Review of Proposal to Rezone Property) b.Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, ¿rnd the general construction activitles on tho site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. No chansee fo ar¿ nrnnnred Nn consfnrctinn is (STAFF C. SIGNATURE I that penalty of the above ans'wers are true and comeot tct the best of my knowledge' I understand its decision. Dâts Submitted tuÈ#on4/1ï14 P7 1 _-*æPLChæ'Id i É Pl nqrove Pagez,of27 7.1.a Packet Pg. 419 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Staff Report with Attachments (Closed Record Review of Proposal to Rezone Property) D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (do not use this sheetfor project øctions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. /J I How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production ofnoise? The nroiecf will have no imnRct on fl-rese items- No chanses to nre nronosed Proposal measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: No mensrrreq nronoserl /,How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals' fish, or marine life? Prniecf will nof nffrecf nlants animals- fish- etc- Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals' fish, or marine life are: No meesrrres nronoserl ,/ 3.How would the proposal be tikely to deplete energy or natural resources? The nroiecf will have no imnacf ôn enersv or nahrral resources. Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: Nnne nronnqe¡l Reidon4/1914 P7 1 _-_æPA_Chdd i É Pi nqrove Paç26of 27 7.1.a Packet Pg. 420 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Staff Report with Attachments (Closed Record Review of Proposal to Rezone Property) 4. "/ rdj¡:-4: How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic riverso threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? The nronos¡l is nof near or will nnf rrqe nr nffect environmenf¡llv sensitive areas 5. Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: None orooosed. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? The nroiecf is not near the shoreline nor will it affect these areas Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: None nronosed- /6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? No chanses to demands on transoofiation. public services. or ities. ,7 Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: None nronosed Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. The nomosed nroiect does not conflict with environmental on recrriremenfs Ratíæd on 4/1il14 P7 1 _-_æPA_Chdd i É Pi nqrove Page27 of 27 7.1.a Packet Pg. 421 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Staff Report with Attachments (Closed Record Review of Proposal to Rezone Property) FILE NO.: PtN2Ol 60044 APPLICANT: Froser DECTARATION OF POSTING NOTICE OF APPLICATION & PUBL¡C HEARING On the 9 doy of July, 2018 the ottoched Nolice of Applicotion ond Public Heoring wos posted os prescribed by Ordinonce ond in ony event where opplicoble on or neor the subjeci property. l, Jennifer Mochugo hereby declore under penolty of perjury under lhe lows of the Siote of Woshinglon thot the foregoing is true ond correct this 9 doy of July, 2018, of Edmonds, Woshington. Signed IBFPT 47 892.DOC; 1 \00006.900000\ )ATTACHMENT K 7.1.a Packet Pg. 422 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Staff Report with Attachments (Closed Record Review of Proposal to Rezone Property) FILE NO.: P1N20160044 APPLICANT: Frasier Fir Tree, LLC. and Pine Wood Management, LLC DECLARATION OF MAILING On the 9'h day ofJuly, 2078, the attacbed Notice of ,{.pplication was mailed by the City to property owners within 300-feet of the property that is subject of the application referenced above. The names wete'provided by the applicant. I, Denise Nelson, hereby declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of \X/ashington that the foregoing is ftue and correct this 9'h day ofJuly, 201"8, at Edmonds, Washington. Sþed: 7.1.a Packet Pg. 423 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Staff Report with Attachments (Closed Record Review of Proposal to Rezone Property) ¡¡c. I t CITY OF EDMONDS NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PUBLIC HEARING PROJECT DESCRIPTION: NAME OF APPLICANT: PROJECT LOCATION: FILE NUMBER: DATE OF APPLICATION: g I tz I zot6 DATE OF NOTICE: 7 I 1'o I 2o1B DATE OF COMPLETENESS: B I 7 I zo16 REQUESTED PERMIT: Rezone Application for a rezone from Single Famiiy (RS-B) to Rèiidential Multi-family (RM-r.s) for two properties located at g1o7 and 9rú - 236rh St. SW. Fraser Fir Tree, LLC. + Pinewood Management, LLC' gtoTlgtrt- e36ti'St. SW, Edmonds WA. PLNzor6oo44 OTER REQUIRED PERMITS: SEPA review REQUIRED STUDIES: NONC EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS : SBPA Environmental Checklist (adopted from AMDzor6ooo8) COMMENTS ON PROPOSAL DUE: July 25, zorS(see public hearing information below) Any person may comment on this application up to- the time of the public co-mment perio-d' receive notice u"a pãtti"ipate in any hearings, and request a copy of the decision on the àppfì""ti"". rhe cit¡imuy Ë"à"pt public commãnts at ary iime prior to the d-oti3g of the r.ecor.d ;i-u,' ;*,' record "pr"áä.i.io" Ìiearing, if any, or, if n_o open rec^ord predecision hearing is pt""i¿Àä, prior to thie decision on the nJoþc1 permit. Only.parties of record as defined in ECDC Lo.oZ.oo'Shave sanding to initiate an administrative appeal' Information on this proposal can be viewed or obtained by,contactilq the^City of-Edmonds ó;";l;p;"nt Services Department aI tzt - Sth Ave North, Edmonds, WA 98ozo. Office hours ãt" fVfo"¿uy, Tuesday, Thursday & Friday from B:oo am to 4:3o pT, and-Wednesdays from B:oo am to noon or online itrràugh t"he city's website at www.permits.edmonds.wa.us/citizen through the*online permits" link. Search foi the above referenced permit file number. Comments may be mailed, emailed, or made in person at the public hearing' CITY CONTACT:Brad Shipley, Associate Planner 4zS-7T r-o2zo, brad.shipley@edmondswa.gov PUBLIC HEARTNG: A public hearing wiil be held before the Planning Bggd on July 25, 2or.8 at 7 p'm', in the Cóuncil Chambãrs located at 25o - 5th Ave North, Edmonds, WA 98ozo. 7.1.a Packet Pg. 424 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Staff Report with Attachments (Closed Record Review of Proposal to Rezone Property) REGEIVED Jtfi 2'l 20ß ADJACENT eROPERTY OWNERS LIST .",¡ËVEIOPMENT SERVICES Attach this notarized declaration to the adjacent property owners list. On my oath, I certify that the names and addresses provided represent all properties located within 300 feet of the subject property' Signatu plicant or Applicant's Representative subscribed and sworn to before me this @-day of )ur^'T"'.tK otary Pub lic in and for the State of Washington Residing at þ'txX ul Wft¡ltt¡l, Ì.¡OTARY PUBIJT Revised on 9/30/I I P2 - Adjacent PropertY Owners List Page 2 of2 7.1.a Packet Pg. 425 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Staff Report with Attachments (Closed Record Review of Proposal to Rezone Property) 00555300100200 611912018 EATON BRAO G &ANNAWoT RESIDENT 563 8TH AVE MENLO PARK, CA 94063 00447000100300 611912019 TAYLOR JAMES & SANDRA OT RESIDENT 2342292ND AVEW EDMONDS, WA 98020 00555300100101 6/19/2018 PINE GREEN MANAGEMENT OT RESIDENT 433 SPRAGUE ST EDMONDS, WA 98020 00555300100201 611912018 LAMMERSDORF VICKI L OT RESIDENT 9792 EDMONDS WAY PMB #320 EDMONDS, WA 98020 00944200000001 MILLER BEN or RESIDENT 22703105TH AVEW EDMONDS, WA 98020 6t19t2018 27033600111700 611912018 MESLER KRISTIN OT RESIDENT 23507 93RD AVE W EDMONDS, WA 98020 00447000f00400 6/19/2018 NICHOLAS JESSICA E or RESIDENT 23430 92ND AVE W EDMONDS, WA 98020-5603 004470001006q1 6l19nu8 PORTUGAL ESTEBAN OT RESIDENT 23516 92ND AVE W EDMONDS, WA 98020-5604 00504€00000400 6/19/2018 HOLMES AtvlY or RESIDENT 23627 92ND AVE W EDMONDS, WA 98020-5605 00837000000200 6l1sl201s FIEDLER ASTRID I OT RESIDENT 9025 236TH ST SW # 2 EDMONDST WA 98026 00944200000400 6/19/2018 SHEEHAN GLEE V or RESIDENT 1,143 GRANTAVE sAN FRANCISCO, CA 94133-3303 00447000200300 611912018 GUTIERREZ TAURA N OT RESIDENT 23429 92ND AVE W EDMONDS, WA 98020 00555300100102 6/19/2018 FRASER FIR TREE LLC OT RESIDENT 433 SPRAGUE ST EDMONDS, WA 98020 00555300100502 6/192018 WARD PATRICN C OT RESIDENT 23411 92NDAVEW EDMONDS, WA 98020 00944200000800 6t1912018 MILLER BENJAMIN D & DI OT RESIDENT 22703 1O5TH AVE W EDMONDS, WA 98020 27033600'111800 d19no18 TODD JUL¡ET ANGELINA/S OT RESIDENT 23515 93RD AVE W EDMONDS, WA 98020 00447000200200 611912018 SHIPLEY CI-IRISTOPHER A OT RESIDENT 23423 92ND AVE W EDMONDS, WA 98020-5603 00447000200400 611912015 BANDY JEFFERY A OT RESIDENT 23507 92ND AVE W EDMONDS, WA 98020-5604 27033600111500 6n9nú8 ANDERSON.TAYLOR J F OT RESIDENT 9205 236TH ST SW EDMONDS, WA 98020-5679 00898400000100 6/19/2018 HSIUNG Yl KAI or RESIDENT 9O2O 236TH STREET SE UNIT 1 EDMONDS, WA 98026 00463300400302 6t19t2018 WALKER WILLIAM P & DIA or RESIDENT IO2O1 RIDGEVIEW DR GRASS VALLEY, CA 95945 00504800000200 611912018 WHITEMAN LOWELL & CYNT OT RESIDENT 23619 92ND AVE W EDMONDS, WA 9EO2O 005s5300100104 6/19/2018 PINEWOOD MANAGEMENT OT RESIDENT 433 SPRAGUE ST EDMONDS, WA 98020 00572300200100 ts11912018 SHEPARD RANDOLPH C OT RESIDENT 23431 93RDAVEW EDMONDS, WA 98020 27033€00111600 611912018 ORVIS JAMES W & MARY H OT RESIDENT 23529 93RDAVENUE W EDMONDS, WA 98020 00447000100200 611912014 SINGKEO LA & KEOGH E OT RESIDENT 23414 92ND AVE W EDMONDS, WA 98020-5603 m447000100500 6/'19/2018 RAYBURN EVELYN C OT RESIDENT 23508 92ND AVE W EDMONDS, WA 98020-5604 00504800000300 6/19/2018 CURRIE CHRISTINE OT RESIDENT 23621 92NDAVEW EDMONDS, WA 98020.5605 00463300400300 611912018 RADOVICH DARWIN or RESIDENT 5327 157TH PL SW EDMONDS, WA 98026 00898400000200 611912018 LEE SUMI oT RESIDENT 9020 236TH ST SW UN|T 2 EDMONDS, WA 98026 7.1.a Packet Pg. 426 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Staff Report with Attachments (Closed Record Review of Proposal to Rezone Property) 00944200000002 6/19/2018 FISCHER SHERRILL F or RESIDENT 23616 EDMONDS WAY UNIT C EDMONDS, WA 98026 00944200000200 6/19/2018 BUTLER SUSAN OT RESIDENT 23616 EDMONDS WAY UNIT B EDMONDS, WA 98026 00944200000700 6lßn018 GAAL JENNIFER L OT RES¡DENT 23616 EDMONDS WAY UNIT G EDMONDS, WA 98026 00504800000100 611912018 SANDERSON WILLIAM Wor RESIDENT 91 I8 236TH ST SW EDMONDS, WA 98026-8925 00837000000400 6/19/2018 SANDOZ JULIE M or RËSIDENÏ 9025 236TH ST SW UNIT 4 EDMONDS, WA 98026-8934 00897000000800 6l19nO1E GARTON GARY & I,ARTHA / OT RESIDENT 9025 236TH ST SW UNIT 6 EDMONDS, WA 98026-8934 00898400000300 6/19/2018 FELSENSTEIN MICHAEL Z or RES¡DENT 9O2O 236TH ST SW UNIT 3 EDMONDS, WA 98026-9512 00555300100109 6119n018 BIN LIN AND YU HONG LU OT RESIDENT 20817 NE 15TH STREET SAMMAMISH, WA 98074 00944200000004 6l19no1a KIM HAEB¡N/SEAMAN SLOA OT RESIDENT 1537 NW 51ST ST SEATTLE, WA 98107 00944200000003 6/19/2018 GAAL JENNIFER L OT RESIDENT 23616 EDMONDS WAY UNIT G EDMONDS, WA 98026 009¡14200000300 611912018 FISCHER SHERRILL F OT RESIDENT 236,16 EDMONDS WAY UNIT C EDMONDS, WA 98026 00463300400101 6/1912018 PERRAULT JEAN Of RESIDENT 900ô 236TH ST SW EDMONDS, WA 98026-8924 00837000000100 â119t2018 ANDERSEN REGGIEA/ KUJ OT RESIDENT 9025 236TH ST SW UNIT 1 EDMONDS, WA 98026-8934 00837000000600 611912018 GARTON GARY L & LAURA OT RESIDENT 9025 236TH ST SW UNIT 6 EDMONDS, WA 98026-8934 00837000000900 61191201A DAVIS TONI K OT RESIDENT 9025 236TH ST SW UNIT 9 EDMONDS, WA 98026-8934 00447000200500 6/19/2018 AGASSIZ SARA JOYCE & R or RESIDENT 979 HIGHWOOD DR SW tssAouAl-|, wA 96027 00555300'100110 6/19/201E BIN LIN AND YU HONG LU or RESIDENT 20817 NE 1sTH ST SAMMAMISH, WA 98074 00944200000600 611912018 KIM HAEBIN/SEAMAN SLOA OT RESIDENT 1537 NW 51ST ST SEATTLE, WA 98107 00463300400204 611912018 PAYNE GREGORY OT RESIDENT 8837 29TH NW SEATTLE, WA 98117 00944200000100 611912018 ARZUi¿IANOV ALBERT E ANZ OT RESIDENT 23616 EDMONDS WAY UNITA EDMONDS, WA 98026 00944200000500 6/19/2018 MONILLAS AMARA & JONAT OT RESIDENT 23616 EDMONDS WAY UNIT E EDMONDS, WA 98026 00¡nr3300400400 5li9l20iE MORRIS KIMBERLY or RESIDENT 9120 236TH ST SW EDMONDS, WA 98026.8925 00837000000300 d19n018 SCHAMEL STACY M TTEE OT RESIDENT 9025 236TH ST SW UNIT 3 EDMONDS, WA 98026-8934 00837000000700 611912018 CROTTS STEPHEN J & TRA OT RESIDENT 9025 236TH ST SW UNIT 7 EDMONDS, WA 98026.8934 00837000000500 d1912018 GRACE CYNTHI¡A A or RESIDENT 23632 HWY 99 STE F EDMONDS, WA 98026-9205 2703360040¿1600 6l1gn018 EDMONDS SCHOOL DIST.IS of RESIDENT 20420 68TH AVE W LYNNWOOD, WA 9E036-7405 00463300400103 6r19t2018 DOMAR ACACIO M OT RESIDENT 2233 NW 59TH STAPT 105 SEATTLE, WA 98107 00463300400200 PAYNE GREG oT RESIDENT 8837 29 NW SEATTLE, WA 98117 6/19nu8 00463300400202 PAYNE GREG oT RESIDENT 8837 29 NW SEATTLE, WA 98117 00¡163300400301 611912üA 9108 DOUGIAS LANDING L OT RESIDENT PO BOX 4188 EVERETT, WA 98204 6t19t2018 7.1.a Packet Pg. 427 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Staff Report with Attachments (Closed Record Review of Proposal to Rezone Property) 00555it00100300 d19n0ß HOUSING AUTHORIW OF S Or RESIDENT 127114THAVEW EVERETT, WA 98204.5783 0ø€fr300300503 611912018 NOVAK RANDALL C OT RESIDENT 26424 174TH ST SE MONROE, WA98272-9200 00¡147000200100 6nSr2o1g JWA INVESTMENTS LLC or RESIDENT PO tsOX 8085 YAKIMA, WA 98908 7.1.a Packet Pg. 428 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Staff Report with Attachments (Closed Record Review of Proposal to Rezone Property) 7.1.b Packet Pg. 429 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Zoning and Vicinity Map (Closed Record Review of Proposal to Frasier Fir + Pinewood Rezone1 236thSt. SWFrasier Fir + Pinewood Application for Rezone Public Hearing before Planning Board July 25, 2018 PLN20160044 7.1.c Packet Pg. 430 Attachment: Attachment 3 - Staff's Public Hearing PowerPoint Presentation [Revision 1] Frasier Fir + Pinewood Rezone2 OVERVIEW —Request —Site History —Review Criteria —Recommendation 7.1.c Packet Pg. 431 Attachment: Attachment 3 - Staff's Public Hearing PowerPoint Presentation [Revision 1] Frasier Fir + Pinewood Rezone3 REQUEST Rezone two parcels from Single Family (RS-8) to Multi-Family (RM-1.5) 7.1.c Packet Pg. 432 Attachment: Attachment 3 - Staff's Public Hearing PowerPoint Presentation [Revision 1] Frasier Fir + Pinewood Rezone4 SITE HISTORY Parcels were developed under Snohomish County development code between 1958-1970 with single family and multi-family uses. The subject site was annexed into Edmonds in 1997. The multi-family development is currently a legal, non-conforming use. 7.1.c Packet Pg. 433 Attachment: Attachment 3 - Staff's Public Hearing PowerPoint Presentation [Revision 1] Frasier Fir + Pinewood Rezone5 REVIEW CRITERIA ECDC 20.40.010 states, “…the following factors shall be considered in reviewing a proposed rezone:” 7.1.c Packet Pg. 434 Attachment: Attachment 3 - Staff's Public Hearing PowerPoint Presentation [Revision 1] Frasier Fir + Pinewood Rezone6 REVIEW CRITERIA Comprehensive Plan. Whether the proposal is consistent with the comprehensive plan; Policies within the Comprehensive Plan mostly address design elements —which will be considered during future design review. One policy relevant to this project is the requirement for RM uses to “…be located near arterial or collector streets.” Edmonds Way is classified as a major arterial. City Council made a motion to approve the Comprehensive Plan map designation change October 2017; however, the amendment was inadvertently left off the ordinance that adopted the 2017 Comprehensive Plan amendments. City Council is scheduled to take action on the 2018 Comprehensive Plan amendments on August 21, 2018. 7.1.c Packet Pg. 435 Attachment: Attachment 3 - Staff's Public Hearing PowerPoint Presentation [Revision 1] Frasier Fir + Pinewood Rezone7 REVIEW CRITERIA Surrounding Area. The relationship of the proposed zoning change to the existing land uses and zoning of surrounding or nearby property; The subject site is situated between multi-family (RM-1.5) and single-family (RS-8) zones. The proposal is consistent with existing land uses in the area. 7.1.c Packet Pg. 436 Attachment: Attachment 3 - Staff's Public Hearing PowerPoint Presentation [Revision 1] Frasier Fir + Pinewood Rezone8 REVIEW CRITERIA Zoning Ordinance. Whether the proposal is consistent with the purposes of the zoning ordinance, and whether the proposal is consistent with the purposes of the proposed zone district; The current zoning designation allows one unit per lot. One of the subject parcels is developed with a multi-family use. Rezoning the property would bring the use into conformance with ECDC. If rezoned, the subject parcels could potentially increase the overall density to 20 units or up to 21 units if the properties are combined. 7.1.c Packet Pg. 437 Attachment: Attachment 3 - Staff's Public Hearing PowerPoint Presentation [Revision 1] Frasier Fir + Pinewood Rezone9 REVIEW CRITERIA Changes. Whether there has been sufficient change in the character of the immediate or surrounding area or in city policy to justify the rezone; The character of the immediate area is a combination of multi-family, single family, and small commercial. The subject site is surrounded on three sides by existing multi- family development. 7.1.c Packet Pg. 438 Attachment: Attachment 3 - Staff's Public Hearing PowerPoint Presentation [Revision 1] Frasier Fir + Pinewood Rezone10 REVIEW CRITERIA Suitability. Whether the property is economically and physically suitable for the uses allowed under the existing zoning, and under the proposed zoning; Re-development is unlikely without a rezone due to the probable scenario where an income-producing, non-conforming multi-family use not being allowed to continue. If rezoned and subsequently re-developed, the site is located in a physically suitable location for the proposed use. A traffic study will be required with any future proposal for redevelopment. 7.1.c Packet Pg. 439 Attachment: Attachment 3 - Staff's Public Hearing PowerPoint Presentation [Revision 1] Frasier Fir + Pinewood Rezone11 REVIEW CRITERIA Value. The relative gain to the public health, safety and welfare compared to the potential increase or decrease in value to the property owners. There would be an increase in value to the property owners if the proposal is approved. The greatest impact of future development would be to the single family zone adjacent to the subject site. During the Comprehensive Plan amendment public hearing, one neighbor voiced concern about allowable building heights under RM-1.5, but appeared satisfied after the discussion. There have been no comments or questions on this rezone application to date 7.1.c Packet Pg. 440 Attachment: Attachment 3 - Staff's Public Hearing PowerPoint Presentation [Revision 1] Frasier Fir + Pinewood Rezone12 The site is well-situated for an upzone. It is surrounded on three sides by high density, multi-family zoning and adjacent to a major arterial with access to public transit. Staff recommends that Planning Board make the recommendation to City Council to APPROVE the requested rezone CONCLUSIONS + RECOMMENDATION 7.1.c Packet Pg. 441 Attachment: Attachment 3 - Staff's Public Hearing PowerPoint Presentation [Revision 1] Frasier Fir + Pinewood Rezone13 236thSt. SWDiscussion 7.1.c Packet Pg. 442 Attachment: Attachment 3 - Staff's Public Hearing PowerPoint Presentation [Revision 1] PLANNING BOARD PUBLIC HEARINGJuly 25, zOLgPUBLIC HEARIN: REZEAT& 9111 236rH ST. SWig',1i--,: !"r i' l¡i iliil.trl.: -tt, \. r":NAMEÞø- (ANC^(ADDRESSZIP CODEEMAIL ADDRESSCITYfæ oTvzz7.1.dPacket Pg. 443Attachment: Attachment 4 - Public Hearing Sign-in Sheet (Closed Record Review of Proposal to Rezone APPROVED Planning Board Minutes July 25, 2018 Page 8 Board Member Rosen said the severity of the situation appears to come from City Councilmembers who cross the line. It would help him to better understand the problems they are trying to solve. Is the problem based on exposure to risk they have encountered over the many years they have been doing quasi-judicial appeals, or were the amendments initiated based on feedback from the WCIA? Mr. Chave answered that in his tenure with the City he has seen things that concerned him in terms of how things play out at the Council level. This is not simply an academic discussion but based on real-life experiences. Board Member Rosen asked, in the scheme of risk, how does the Council’s involvement in quasi-judicial appeals compare. City Attorney Taraday said the amendments are intended to manage but not eliminate risk. In his opinion, the amendments represent a very sensible way to manage risk. Divorcing politics from the land use issues, you get a better land use application process and better policies. It is important to understand that, while the City Councilmembers may have a better sense of the values of the City than a Hearing Examiner or judge, those values are not supposed to be expressed when processing land use applications. They are supposed to be expressed when adopting code regulations. Mr. Lien referred to City Attorney Taraday’s 2016 memorandum stating that not only is it a risk to the City but individual Councilmembers could also be liable for decisions made in the quasi-judicial process. CHAIR MONROE SECONDED THE MOTION. Chair Monroe voiced reservations about the proposed amendment to take the Council out of the quasi-judicial decision-making process, recognizing that it is nearly impossible to write codes that developers cannot eventually find loopholes around. He said he is shocked that the City Council wants to give away this power. He believes the proposed changes will eventually be adopted by the City Council but the Board should emphasize the need for the Council to take a hard and careful look at the pros and cons before making a final decision. CHAIR MONROE MOVED TO AMEND THE MOTION TO ADD THAT THE BOARD ADVISES THE CITY COUNCIL TO TAKE A HARD LOOK BEFORE GIVING AWAY THIS PUBLIC TRUST. VICE CHAIR CHEUNG SECONDED THE MOTION TO AMEND. Vice Chair Cheung voiced concern about turning over quasi-judicial decisions to a judge who may not be as familiar with the City’s codes as the City Council. The City Councilmembers are accountable to their constituents. He understands the potential conflicts of interest but agrees the Council should carefully weigh the pros and cons before making a decision. It is different for petitioners to stand in front of a judge who would expect them to present their appeal in a more legal manner versus speaking before the City Council. On the other hand, it sounds like appeals are not common and most people who appeal are probably more experienced and have their own counsel. THE MAIN MOTION, AS AMENDED, WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. Chair Monroe closed the public hearing. The Board took a 5-minute break at 8:32 p.m. They reconvened the meeting at 8:37 p.m. PUBLIC HEARING ON REZONE AT 9107 AND 9111 – 236TH STREET SW FROM RS-8 TO RM-1.5 Chair Monroe reviewed the rules and procedures for the public hearing and then opened the hearing. He reminded the Board of the appearance of Fairness Doctrine and asked if any member of the Board had engaged in communication with opponents or proponents regarding the issues in the rezone application outside of the public hearing process. All Board Members answered no. He also invited Board Members to disclose any ex-parte communications, and none indicated any. He asked if any member of the Board had a conflict of interest or believed he/she could not hear and consider the application in a fair and objective manner. None indicated a concern. Lastly, he asked if anyone in the audience objected to any Board Member’s participation as a decision maker in the hearing. No one in the audience indicated a concern. All those who planned to participate in the hearing were asked to stand, raise their right hand, and affirm that the testimony they give would be the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth. Mr. Shipley presented the Staff Report and Martin Reimers was present to represent the applicant. 7.1.e Packet Pg. 444 Attachment: Attachment 5 - Approved July 25, 2018 Planning Board Minutes Excerpt (Closed Record Review of Proposal to Rezone Property) APPROVED Planning Board Minutes July 25, 2018 Page 9 Mr. Shipley advised that the applicant is proposing to rezone the subject sites (9107 and 9111 – 236th Street SW) from Single-Family Residential (RS-8) to Multi-Family Residential (RM-1.5). The two sites are currently developed with a single-family residential use and a legal, non-conforming multi-family use. If adopted, the proposal would bring the non-conforming multi-family use into compliance with the zoning ordinance. The parcels were developed under Snohomish County zoning between 1958 and 1970, and the subject site was annexed into the City in 1997. Mr. Shipley reminded the Board of the criteria it must consider when reviewing site-specific rezone applications: • Comprehensive Plan. Whether the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan Map designation change from Single Family Urban I to Edmond Way Corridor was heard by the City Council on October 17, 2017. The Council made the motion to approve the map change, but the amendment was inadvertently omitted from the ordinance adopting the 2017 Comprehensive Plan amendments. The Council is scheduled to take action on the 2018 Comprehensive Plan amendments on August 21st. Once adopted, the zoning proposal will be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The proposal is also consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Policy that multi-family uses must be located near arterial or collector streets. The parcels are located on 236th Street SW but are within 300 feet of Edmonds Way where there is public transportation. Therefore, the proposal meets the criteria for being adjacent to a major arterial. • Zoning Ordinance. Whether the proposal is consistent with the purposes of the zoning ordinance and whether the proposal is consistent with the purposes of the proposed zone district. The current zoning designation allows one single-family home per lot, and the proposed new zoning designation would allow a density of six units on the 9107 property and 14 units on the 9111 property. If the lots are combined, a total of 21 units would be allowed. Rezoning the property would bring the current multi-family use into conformance with the code. • Surrounding Area. The relationship of the proposed zoning change to the existing land uses and zoning of surrounding or nearby property. Surrounding uses in the subject area are primarily multi-family and single-family residential. There is some light commercial at the corner of 236th Street SW and SR-104. The subject site is bordered on three sides by multi-family (RM-1.5) zoning, and single-family (RS-8) zoning abuts the subject site to the west. Staff believes the proposed rezone is compatible with the surrounding area. • Changes. Whether there has been sufficient change in the character of the immediate or surrounding area or in city policy to justify the rezone. The proposed zoning is justified as the area is already developed with multi-family residential that has existed since the late 1970’s. Rezoning the property would bring the current non-conforming multi-family use into compliance. • Suitability. Whether the property is economically and physically suitable for the uses allowed under the existing zoning and under the proposed zoning. One factor could be the length of time the property has remained undeveloped compared to the surrounding area and parcels elsewhere in the same zoning. The neighborhood surrounding the subject parcels has long been developed with either single-family homes or apartments. The site is located about 300 feet from a major arterial so the traffic impact to the neighborhood would be minimal. If rezoned for multi-family use, a future development application would be required to submit a traffic impact analysis. A SEPA and Architectural Design Board review would also be required for any proposal with more than four units. • Value. The relative gain to the public health, safety and welfare compared to the potential increase or decrease in value to the property owner. There would be an increase in value to the property owners if the proposal is approved, and the greatest impact of future development would be to the single-family zone adjacent to the subject site. During the Comprehensive Plan amendment public hearing, one neighbor voiced concern about the allowable building heights under RM-1.5 but appeared satisfied after the discussion. There have been no comments or questions related to the rezone proposal to date. Mr. Shipley recommended the Planning Board make a recommendation to the City Council to approve the requested rezone as outlined in the Staff Report. The applicant, Martin Reimers, did not have any additional comments to add but indicated he was available to answer questions. 7.1.e Packet Pg. 445 Attachment: Attachment 5 - Approved July 25, 2018 Planning Board Minutes Excerpt (Closed Record Review of Proposal to Rezone Property) APPROVED Planning Board Minutes July 25, 2018 Page 10 John Lange, Edmonds, said that until three years ago, he was the property manager for the apartment units located on the subject site. He was impressed with the quality of the owners. The owners repaired things and managed the properties well, doing upgrades when needed. They did not let them fall into disrepair with the hope of getting a rezone at some point in the future. They maintained high-quality tenants, as well. The property was a benefit to the community. Board Member Lovell asked about access to the property, and Mr. Shipley answered that each property has a separate access from 236th Street SW. Board Member Lovell asked if surrounding property owners have commented regarding the proposed rezone, and Mr. Shipley answered that no comments were received relative to the rezone application, but one adjacent property owner voiced concern during the Comprehensive Plan amendment hearing about height. After he let her know that the height limit would not be significantly different, she appeared to be satisfied with the proposed change. Board Member Lovell asked if the property owner intends to demolish the existing buildings and redevelop the site. Mr. Reimers indicated the intent is to redevelop the site under the RM-1.5 zoning. Chair Monroe asked how many people live on the subject site now, and Mr. Reimers answered that there are seven apartment units and one single-family home. Chair Monroe pointed out that the rezone would allow up to 21 units, depending on whether or not the lots are combined. He asked about traffic impacts, and Mr. Shipley reminded the Board that a traffic study would be required as part of any development application. Board Member Robles pointed out that 236th Street is posted as 25 miles per hour and is a major driveway to Madrona School. It also connects with SR-104, which has a D rating for traffic with a recent motorcycle accident. It is important to note that a traffic study will be required. Board Member Robles asked if adjacent property owners were actively notified of the proposed change, and Mr. Shipley answered that notices were posted on the site and mailed to property owners. Notice was also published in the local newspapers and on the City’s website. Board Member Robles recalled that there were some recent problems with stormwater runoff during a significant storm. He asked if stormwater issues would be addressed as part of a development proposal. Mr. Shipley responded that improvements have been made in the area recently and stormwater would be reviewed by the Engineering Department prior to issuance of a development permit. BOARD MEMBER LOVELL MOVED THAT, BASED ON THE FINDINGS OF FACT, ANALYSIS, CONCLUSIONS AND ATTACHMENTS IN THE STAFF REPORT, THE BOARD FORWARD A RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL TO APPROVE THE REQUESTED REZONE FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 9107 AND 9111 – 236TH STREET SW FROM SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (RS-8) TO MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (RM-1.5). CHAIR MONROE SECONDED THE MOTION, WHICH CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. DISCUSSION ON POTENTIAL PLANNING BOARD RETREAT In light of the Board’s recent work on the Housing Strategy, Board Member Lovell suggested it would be helpful to talk about one or more aspects of the strategies implementation at their retreat. Options include: • Invite a developer to talk about what they need to develop affordable housing on a given piece of land in Edmonds. • An independent discussion and presentation by staff as to the available lands. The Available Lands Inventory could be used to identify where different types of housing might be developed. • Pick a hypothetical property that may involve a rezone to accommodate affordable housing. What would the steps and process be to get that done? Chair Monroe noted that Board Member Crank previously suggested that a representative from Blockable be invited to share information with the Board. The Board decided to postpone further discussion about the retreat until more Board Members were present to participate. They were invited to email potential agenda topics to staff. 7.1.e Packet Pg. 446 Attachment: Attachment 5 - Approved July 25, 2018 Planning Board Minutes Excerpt (Closed Record Review of Proposal to Rezone Property) ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS AND APPROVING A CHANGE IN ZONING FOR CERTAIN PROPERTY LOCATED AT 9107 AND 9111—236TH ST. SW FROM SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (RS-8) TO MULTIPLE RESIDENTIAL (RM-1.5); AUTHORIZING AMENDMENT TO THE CITY’S OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE. WHEREAS, on September 12, 2016, a land use application was submitted by Martin Reimers on behalf of Frasier Fir Tree, LLC and Pinewood Management, LLC for a rezone of certain real property totaling 0.75 acres with the Snohomish County tax parcel numbers of 00555300100102 and 00555300100104; and WHEREAS, the application was determined to be complete on October 10, 2016; and WHEREAS, a combined Notice of Application and Public Hearing was issued on July 10, 2018; and WHEREAS, a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) was issued for the subject properties on September 11, 2017 for the associated Comprehensive Plan Map amendment (AMD20160008), which was adopted in Ordinance 4123 on June 25, 2018; and WHEREAS, the Comprehensive Plan Map land use designation for the subject properties was amended and became effective on August 31, 2018 from Single-Family Urban 1 to Edmonds Way Corridor; and WHEREAS, the proposed rezone to Multiple Residential (RM-1.5) is compatible with the Edmonds Way Corridor Comprehensive Plan land use designation; and WHEREAS, a site-specific rezone is a “Type IV-B” application, where staff makes a recommendation to Planning Board who conducts a public hearing and forwards a recommendation to City Council; and 7.1.f Packet Pg. 447 Attachment: Attachment 6 - Draft Ordinance (Closed Record Review of Proposal to Rezone Property) WHEREAS, Planning Board held an open public hearing on July 25, 2018, adopted staff’s findings, and unanimously agreed to forward the recommendation to approve the requested rezone to City Council; and WHEREAS, City Council conducted a closed record review of the proposal on October 16, 2018; and WHEREAS, City Council reviewed the full record before Planning Board, including the Planning Advisory Report: Findings, Analysis, and Recommendations dated July 20, 2018, and the various attachments thereto; and WHEREAS, the Edmonds City Council agrees with Planning Board’s analysis that the proposed rezone is in the public interest and satisfies all applicable criteria of the Edmonds Community Development Code; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. For its findings and conclusions in support of the rezone effected by this ordinance, the City Council hereby adopts by reference the findings and conclusions contained within the Planning Division Advisory Report: Findings, Analysis, and Recommendations dated July 20, 2018 (File No. PLN20160044). Section 2. The certain real property identified by Snohomish County tax parcel numbers 00555300100102 and 00555300100104, as shown on the attached zoning map (Exhibit A) is hereby rezoned from RS-8 to RM-1.5. Exhibit A attached hereto is hereby incorporated by this reference as if herein set forth in full. Section 3. The Development Services Director or designee is hereby authorized and directed to make appropriate amendments to the Edmonds Zoning Map in order to properly designate the rezoned property as Multiple Residential (RM-1.5) pursuant to Section 2 of this ordinance. Section 4. Effective Date. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifically delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum and shall take effect five (5) days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the title. 7.1.f Packet Pg. 448 Attachment: Attachment 6 - Draft Ordinance (Closed Record Review of Proposal to Rezone Property) APPROVED: MAYOR DAVE EARLING ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY: BY JEFF TARADAY FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE DATE: ORDINANCE NO. 7.1.f Packet Pg. 449 Attachment: Attachment 6 - Draft Ordinance (Closed Record Review of Proposal to Rezone Property) 4 SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. __________ of the City of Edmonds, Washington On the ____ day of ___________, 2018, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed Ordinance No. _____________. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting of the title, provides as follows: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS AND APPROVING A CHANGE IN ZONING FOR CERTAIN PROPERTY LOCATED AT 9107 AND 9111—236TH ST. SW FROM SINGLE- FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (RS-8) TO MULTIPLE RESIDENTIAL (RM-1.5); AUTHORIZING AMENDMENT TO THE CITY’S OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE. . The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request. DATED this _____ day of ________________, 2018. CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY 4840-7251-8158, v. 1 7.1.f Packet Pg. 450 Attachment: Attachment 6 - Draft Ordinance (Closed Record Review of Proposal to Rezone Property) 5 EXHIBIT A 7.1.f Packet Pg. 451 Attachment: Attachment 6 - Draft Ordinance (Closed Record Review of Proposal to Rezone Property) City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 10/16/2018 Third Quarter 2018 Budget Amendment Staff Lead: Scott James Department: Administrative Services Preparer: Debra Sharp Background/History Amend the 2018 Budget Ordinance No. 4118 Staff Recommendation Motion to approve third quarter budget amendment Ordinance No. XXXX amending the 2018 Budget. Narrative There are a total of nineteen budget amendments. All of the amendments are new items for Council to review. There are twelve General Fund requests. Six of the amendments do not effect the General Fund ending fund balance. They include four police amendments for overtime which are offset by new grant revenue, one amendment for the diversity film series which is also offset by new revenue and a request to move engineering salaries to engineering overtime. There are six amendments that reduce the General Fund balance by $210,200. They include the holiday market, facilities salaries, facilities overtime, facilities condition assessment, fire panels for city buildings and recommended security measures. There are six non-general fund amendments. They include two amendments for the Construction Street Fund. One of the street amendments is for an intrafund transfer between programs in order to transfer mitigation fees to the construction program. There are three amendments for the utilities funds plus a transfer from the sewer utility fund to the Municipal Arts Fund for a sewer project. A request, submitted by the Building Department, was added to the third quarter budget amendment during the Finance Committee for MyBuildingPermit in the amount of $39,566. Attachments: 2018 3rd Quarter Budget Amendment Ordinance 7.2 Packet Pg. 452 1 ORDINANCE NO. _______ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 4118 AS A RESULT OF UNANTICIPATED TRANSFERS AND EXPENDITURES OF VARIOUS FUNDS, AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE. WHEREAS, previous actions taken by the City Council require Interfund Transfers and increases in appropriations; and WHEREAS, state law requires an ordinance be adopted whenever money is transferred from one fund to another; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the amended budget appropriations and information which was made available; and approves the appropriation of local, state, and federal funds and the increase or decrease from previously approved programs within the 2018 Budget; and WHEREAS, the applications of funds have been identified; THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Section 1. of Ordinance No. 4118 adopting the final budget for the fiscal year 2018 is hereby amended to reflect the changes shown in Exhibits A, B, C, D, and E adopted herein by reference. 7.2.a Packet Pg. 453 Attachment: 2018 3rd Quarter Budget Amendment Ordinance (Third Quarter 2018 Budget Amendment) 2 Section 2. Effective Date. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifically delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum, and shall take effect five (5) days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the title. APPROVED: MAYOR, DAVE EARLING ATTEST/AUTHENTICATE: CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY: APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY: BY JEFF TARADAY FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE DATE: ORDINANCE NO. 7.2.a Packet Pg. 454 Attachment: 2018 3rd Quarter Budget Amendment Ordinance (Third Quarter 2018 Budget Amendment) 3 SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. __________ of the City of Edmonds, Washington On the ____ day of ___________, 2018, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed Ordinance No. _____________. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting of the title, provides as follows: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 4118 AS A RESULT OF UNANTICIPATED TRANSFERS AND EXPENDITURES OF VARIOUS FUNDS, AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE. The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request. DATED this _____ day of ________________, 2018. CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY 7.2.a Packet Pg. 455 Attachment: 2018 3rd Quarter Budget Amendment Ordinance (Third Quarter 2018 Budget Amendment) EXHIBIT “A”: Budget Amendment Summary (October 2018) 4 2018 2018 FUND FUND BEGINNING ENDING NO.DESCRIPTION FUND BALANCE REVENUE EXPENDITURES FUND BALANCE 001 GENERAL FUND 10,273,340 39,501,682 44,602,053 5,172,969 009 LEOFF-MEDICAL INS. RESERVE 417,150 285,650 363,438 339,362 011 RISK MANAGEMENT RESERVE FUND 902,700 19,180 - 921,880 012 CONTINGENCY RESERVE FUND 5,447,140 64,750 49,584 5,462,306 014 HISTORIC PRESERVATION GIFT FUND 7,360 5,170 5,400 7,130 016 BUILDING MAINTENANCE FUND 210,220 - - 210,220 017 MARSH RESTORATION & PRESERVATION FUND - 300,000 - 300,000 018 EDMONDS HOMELESSNESS RESPONSE FUND - 250,000 - 250,000 019 EDMONDS OPIOID RESPONSE FUND - 250,000 - 250,000 104 DRUG ENFORCEMENT FUND 690 130,560 103,252 27,998 111 STREET FUND 1,102,080 1,784,270 1,856,507 1,029,843 112 COMBINED STREET CONST/IMPROVE 728,770 3,731,003 3,844,638 615,135 117 MUNICIPAL ARTS ACQUIS. FUND 533,200 149,385 183,892 498,693 118 MEMORIAL STREET TREE 18,350 400 - 18,750 120 HOTEL/MOTEL TAX REVENUE FUND 82,360 87,960 90,550 79,770 121 EMPLOYEE PARKING PERMIT FUND 69,290 25,640 26,880 68,050 122 YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP FUND 15,350 850 1,000 15,200 123 TOURISM PROMOTIONAL FUND/ARTS 59,890 30,520 29,700 60,710 125 PARK ACQ/IMPROVEMENT 1,901,000 1,446,880 2,733,000 614,880 126 SPECIAL CAPITAL FUND 2,165,210 1,448,300 2,651,867 961,643 127 GIFTS CATALOG FUND 265,670 53,810 70,900 248,580 130 CEMETERY MAINTENANCE/IMPROV 188,880 180,170 213,509 155,541 136 PARKS TRUST FUND 155,910 3,150 - 159,060 137 CEMETERY MAINTENANCE TRUST FD 938,110 33,360 - 971,470 138 SISTER CITY COMMISSION 7,600 10,170 10,500 7,270 211 LID FUND CONTROL 3,810 14,400 16,450 1,760 231 2012 LTGO DEBT SERVICE FUND - 708,700 708,700 - 332 PARKS CONSTRUCTION 1,544,080 1,621,977 2,346,881 819,176 421 WATER 19,153,890 9,660,690 13,465,028 15,349,552 422 STORM 10,990,760 5,317,996 6,986,013 9,322,743 423 SEWER / TREATMENT PLANT 44,666,810 11,917,843 14,654,540 41,930,113 424 BOND RESERVE FUND 843,960 1,991,530 1,991,520 843,970 511 EQUIPMENT RENTAL FUND 8,996,080 1,624,640 1,670,082 8,950,638 512 Technology Rental Fund 254,110 1,268,390 1,335,413 187,087 617 FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND 226,480 69,690 75,218 220,952 Totals 112,170,250 83,988,716 100,086,515 96,072,451 7.2.a Packet Pg. 456 Attachment: 2018 3rd Quarter Budget Amendment Ordinance (Third Quarter 2018 Budget Amendment) EXHIBIT “B”: Budget Amendments by Revenue (October 2018) 5 ORD. NO.ORD. NO.ORD. NO.ORD. NO.ORD. NO.ORD. NO.2018 FUND FUND 4089 4094 4096 4109 4118 Amended NO.DESCRIPTION 1/1/2018 1/1/2018 3/2/2018 4/27/2018 8/3/2018 10/2018 Budget 001 General Fund 38,783,555$ -$ 18,000$ 682,500$ -$ 17,627$ 39,501,682$ 009 Leoff-Medical Ins. Reserve 285,650 - - - - - 285,650 011 Risk Management Reserve Fund 19,180 - - - - - 19,180 012 Contingency Reserve Fund 64,750 - - - - - 64,750 014 Historic Preservation Gift Fund 5,170 - - - - - 5,170 017 Marsh Restoration & Preservation Fund - - - 300,000 300,000 018 Edmonds Homelessness Response Fund - - - 250,000 250,000 019 Edmonds Opioid Response Fund - - - 250,000 250,000 104 Drug Enforcement Fund 130,560 - - - - - 130,560 111 Street Fund 1,784,270 - - - - - 1,784,270 112 Combined Street Const/Improve 2,942,656 - 659,547 32,000 - 96,800 3,731,003 117 Municipal Arts Acquis. Fund 146,200 - - - - 3,185 149,385 118 Memorial Street Tree 400 - - - - - 400 120 Hotel/Motel Tax Revenue Fund 87,960 - - - - - 87,960 121 Employee Parking Permit Fund 25,640 - - - - - 25,640 122 Youth Scholarship Fund 850 - - - - - 850 123 Tourism Promotional Fund/Arts 30,520 - - - - - 30,520 125 Park Acq/Improvement 1,446,880 - - - - - 1,446,880 126 Special Capital Fund 1,448,300 - - - - - 1,448,300 127 Gifts Catalog Fund 53,810 - - - - - 53,810 130 Cemetery Maintenance/Improv 180,170 - - - - - 180,170 136 Parks Trust Fund 3,150 - - - - - 3,150 137 Cemetery Maintenance Trust Fd 33,360 - - - - - 33,360 138 Sister City Commission 10,170 - - - - - 10,170 211 Lid Fund Control 14,400 - - - - - 14,400 231 2012 LTGO Debt Service fund 708,700 - - - - - 708,700 332 Parks Construction 1,494,534 - 127,443 - - - 1,621,977 421 Water 9,660,690 - - - - - 9,660,690 422 Storm 5,317,996 - - - - - 5,317,996 423 Sewer / Treatment Plant 11,566,980 - 350,863 - - - 11,917,843 424 Bond Reserve Fund 1,991,530 - - - - - 1,991,530 511 Equipment Rental Fund 1,624,640 - - - - - 1,624,640 512 Technology Rental Fund 1,268,390 - - - - 1,268,390 617 Firemen'S Pension Fund 69,690 - - - - - 69,690 Totals 81,200,751$ -$ 1,155,853$ 1,514,500$ -$ 117,612$ 83,988,716$ 7.2.a Packet Pg. 457 Attachment: 2018 3rd Quarter Budget Amendment Ordinance (Third Quarter 2018 Budget Amendment) EXHIBIT “C”: Budget Amendments by Expenditure (October 2018) 6 ORD. NO.ORD. NO.ORD. NO.ORD. NO.ORD. NO.ORD. NO.2018 FUND FUND 4089 4094 4096 4109 4118 0 Amended NO.DESCRIPTION 1/1/2018 1/1/2018 3/2/2018 4/27/2018 8/3/2018 10/2018 Budget 001 General Fund 43,086,131$ 272,000$ 186,030$ 709,577$ 80,922$ 267,393$ 44,602,053$ 009 Leoff-Medical Ins. Reserve 294,270 - - - 69,168 - 363,438 012 Contingency Reserve Fund 49,584 - - - - - 49,584 014 Historic Preservation Gift Fund 5,400 - - - - - 5,400 104 Drug Enforcement Fund 103,252 - - - - - 103,252 111 Street Fund 1,856,507 - - - - - 1,856,507 112 Combined Street Const/Improve 2,823,041 - 670,547 254,250 - 96,800 3,844,638 117 Municipal Arts Acquis. Fund 182,480 - 1,412 - - - 183,892 120 Hotel/Motel Tax Revenue Fund 90,550 - - - - - 90,550 121 Employee Parking Permit Fund 26,880 - - - - - 26,880 122 Youth Scholarship Fund 1,000 - - - - - 1,000 123 Tourism Promotional Fund/Arts 29,700 - - - - - 29,700 125 Park Acq/Improvement 2,432,040 - 300,960 - - - 2,733,000 126 Special Capital Fund 1,734,535 - 782,862 (82,250) 216,720 - 2,651,867 127 Gifts Catalog Fund 45,900 - - 25,000 - - 70,900 130 Cemetery Maintenance/Improv 197,514 - 15,995 - - - 213,509 138 Sister City Commission 10,500 - - - - - 10,500 211 Lid Fund Control 16,450 - - - - - 16,450 231 2012LTGO Debt Service Fund 708,700 - - - - - 708,700 332 Parks Construction 1,982,160 - 164,721 200,000 - - 2,346,881 421 Water 12,270,201 - 1,025,274 139,200 - 30,353 13,465,028 422 Storm 6,562,877 - 273,583 117,200 - 32,353 6,986,013 423 Sewer / Treatment Plant 13,066,764 - 1,092,038 7,200 - 488,538 14,654,540 424 Bond Reserve Fund 1,991,520 - - - - - 1,991,520 511 Equipment Rental Fund 1,662,265 - - - 7,817 - 1,670,082 512 Technology Rental Fund 1,191,113 - 144,300 - - - 1,335,413 617 Firemen'S Pension Fund 75,218 - - - - - 75,218 Totals 92,496,552$ 272,000$ 4,657,722$ 1,370,177$ 374,627$ 915,437$ 100,086,515$ 7.2.a Packet Pg. 458 Attachment: 2018 3rd Quarter Budget Amendment Ordinance (Third Quarter 2018 Budget Amendment) EXHIBIT “D”: Budget Amendment Summary (October 2018) 7 Fund Number Change in Beginning Fund Balance Revenue Expense Change in Ending Fund Balance 001 - 17,627 267,393 (249,766) 112 - 96,800 96,800 - 117 - 3,185 - 3,185 421 - - 30,353 (30,353) 422 - - 32,353 (32,353) 423 - - 488,538 (488,538) Total Change - 117,612 915,437 (797,825) 7.2.a Packet Pg. 459 Attachment: 2018 3rd Quarter Budget Amendment Ordinance (Third Quarter 2018 Budget Amendment) EXHIBIT “E”: New Items for Council to Consider (October 2018) 8 Budget Amendment for:Third Quarter Item Description: Department: Division: Title: Preparer: Department Account Number: Budget Amendment Type? What is the nature of the expenditure?One-Time Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital?Operating Fill In Item Description[s] Baseline Budget 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 50,000 7,114 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sub-Total $50,000 $7,114 $0 $0 $0 $0 $57,114 $0 $0 $0 $0 Revenue and Ending Cash 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Ending Cash: Decrease (Increase)0 0 0 0 0 Ending Cash: Decrease (Increase)0 0 0 0 0 Grants/Contributions 0 0 0 0 0 General Fund Subsidy 0 0 0 0 0 New Revenue 7,114 0 0 0 0 Other 0 0 0 0 0 Total Revenue and Ending Cash $7,114 $0 $0 $0 $0 Snohomish County Human Services made available funding for first responders and social workers to assist individuals or households with whom they come in contact who are 1) identified as high risk for chemical dependency or mental health issues, and 2) who need assistance to abate an emergency situation. The City's shared social worker is utilizing these funds to provide travel to treatment, temporary housing, clothing and supplies. Nondepartmental GENERALHomeless Services Fund Name:First Responder Flex Fund Project Caroline Thompson Total Expenses Comments 001.000.337.40.000.00 If previously discussed, date(s) of discussion: 001.000.39.565.40.41.00 Homeless Services 001.000.39.565.40.41.00 New Item For Council To Consider 7.2.a Packet Pg. 460 Attachment: 2018 3rd Quarter Budget Amendment Ordinance (Third Quarter 2018 Budget Amendment) EXHIBIT “E”: New Items for Council to Consider (October 2018) 9 Budget Amendment for:Third Quarter Item Description: Department: Division: Title: Preparer: Department Account Number: Budget Amendment Type? What is the nature of the expenditure?One-Time Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital?Operating Fill In Item Description[s] Baseline Budget 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 28,500 2,812 0 0 0 0 0 423 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sub-Total $28,500 $3,235 $0 $0 $0 $0 $31,735 $0 $0 $0 $0 Revenue and Ending Cash 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Ending Cash: Decrease (Increase)0 0 0 0 0 Ending Cash: Decrease (Increase)0 0 0 0 0 Grants/Contributions 0 0 0 0 0 General Fund Subsidy 0 0 0 0 0 New Revenue 3,235 0 0 0 0 Other 0 0 0 0 0 Total Revenue and Ending Cash $3,235 $0 $0 $0 $0 If previously discussed, date(s) of discussion: Total Expenses Comments 001.000.342.10.000.00 Each year the Police Department estimates the amount of reimbursable overtime that will be earned for security provided for community events like the Edmonds Arts Festival and Taste of Edmonds. This budget amendment increases the reimbursable overtime budget for Patrol for hours already worked for events, matched by higher than budgeted revenues paid by the sponsors of the events. Police GENERALField Services - Patrol Fund Name:Police Reimbursable Overtime - Special Events Caroline Thompson 001.000.41.521.22.12.10; 001.000.41.521.22.23.10 Patrol OT-Reimbursable 001.000.41.521.22.12.10 Patrol Benefits-Reimb. 001.000.41.521.22.23.10 New Item For Council To Consider 7.2.a Packet Pg. 461 Attachment: 2018 3rd Quarter Budget Amendment Ordinance (Third Quarter 2018 Budget Amendment) EXHIBIT “E”: New Items for Council to Consider (October 2018) 10 Budget Amendment for:Third Quarter Item Description: Department: Division: Title: Preparer: Department Account Number: Budget Amendment Type? What is the nature of the expenditure?One-Time Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital?Operating Fill In Item Description[s] Baseline Budget 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 28,500 1,266 0 0 0 0 0 189 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sub-Total $28,500 $1,455 $0 $0 $0 $0 $29,955 $0 $0 $0 $0 Revenue and Ending Cash 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Ending Cash: Decrease (Increase)0 0 0 0 0 Ending Cash: Decrease (Increase)0 0 0 0 0 Grants/Contributions 1,455 0 0 0 0 General Fund Subsidy 0 0 0 0 0 New Revenue 0 0 0 0 0 Other 0 0 0 0 0 Total Revenue and Ending Cash $1,455 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Expenses Comments 001.000.333.97.056.00 Members of the Police Department participate in periodic Marine Vessel RAD/NUC Detection exercises coordinated by Seattle Fire Department. Grant funding available through Seattle Fire reimburses for staff overtime spent participating in the drills. Neither the expenditures nor the offsetting revenue were budgeted in the 2018 budget due to the sporadic nature of the drills. Police GENERALField Services - Patrol Fund Name:Police Reimbursable Overtime - DNDO Drill Caroline Thompson 001.000.41.521.22.12.10, 001.000.41.521.22.23.10 Patrol OT-Reimbursable 001.000.41.521.22.12.10 If previously discussed, date(s) of discussion: Patrol Benefits-Reimb. 001.000.41.521.22.23.10 New Item For Council To Consider 7.2.a Packet Pg. 462 Attachment: 2018 3rd Quarter Budget Amendment Ordinance (Third Quarter 2018 Budget Amendment) EXHIBIT “E”: New Items for Council to Consider (October 2018) 11 Budget Amendment for:Third Quarter Item Description: Department: Division: Title: Preparer: Department Account Number: Budget Amendment Type? What is the nature of the expenditure?One-Time Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital?Operating Fill In Item Description[s] Baseline Budget 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 8,200 3,155 0 0 0 0 0 468 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sub-Total $8,200 $3,623 $0 $0 $0 $0 $11,823 $0 $0 $0 $0 Revenue and Ending Cash 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Ending Cash: Decrease (Increase)0 0 0 0 0 Ending Cash: Decrease (Increase)0 0 0 0 0 Grants/Contributions 3,623 0 0 0 0 General Fund Subsidy 0 0 0 0 0 New Revenue 0 0 0 0 0 Other 0 0 0 0 0 Total Revenue and Ending Cash $3,623 $0 $0 $0 $0 001.000.41.521.71.12.10, 001.000.41.521.71.23.10 Traffic OT-Reimbursable 001.000.41.521.71.12.10 If previously discussed, date(s) of discussion: Traffic Benefits-Reimb. 001.000.41.521.71.23.10 New Item For Council To Consider In January 2018 the Police Department received new funding from the Washington State Traffic Safety Commission, via the Snohomish County Sheriff's Office, for pedestrian safety activities. The funding covered education and enforcement in three areas of Edmonds where clusters of car versus pedestrian accidents occurred in 2017. Police GENERALField Services - Traffic Fund Name:Police Reimbursable Overtime - Pedestrian Safety Caroline Thompson Total Expenses Comments 001.000.334.03.500.00 7.2.a Packet Pg. 463 Attachment: 2018 3rd Quarter Budget Amendment Ordinance (Third Quarter 2018 Budget Amendment) EXHIBIT “E”: New Items for Council to Consider (October 2018) 12 Budget Amendment for:Third Quarter Item Description: Department: Division: Title: Preparer: Department Account Number: Budget Amendment Type? What is the nature of the expenditure?One-Time Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital?Operating Fill In Item Description[s] Baseline Budget 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 38,000 6,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sub-Total $38,000 $6,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $44,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 Revenue and Ending Cash 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Ending Cash: Decrease (Increase)5,000 0 0 0 0 Ending Cash: Decrease (Increase)0 0 0 0 0 Grants/Contributions 0 0 0 0 0 General Fund Subsidy 0 0 0 0 0 New Revenue 1,000 0 0 0 0 Other 0 0 0 0 0 Total Revenue and Ending Cash $6,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 001.000.61.558.70.41.00 Professional Services If previously discussed, date(s) of discussion: New Item For Council To Consider Holiday Market revenue and expenditures. Every year we receive revenue in the form of vendor fees, which we use to off-set costs associated with producing the Holiday Market. Revenue from fees is approximately $6000. Costs usually run approximately $6000 as well. This amendment would allow the Dept. to expend revenues received to cover costs. Economic Development/Community Services GENERALEconomic Development Fund Name:Holiday Market revenue and expenditures Patrick Doherty Total Expenses Comments 001.000.39.508.00.00.00 001.000.347.93.000.00 7.2.a Packet Pg. 464 Attachment: 2018 3rd Quarter Budget Amendment Ordinance (Third Quarter 2018 Budget Amendment) EXHIBIT “E”: New Items for Council to Consider (October 2018) 13 Budget Amendment for:Third Quarter Item Description: Department: Division: Title: Preparer: Department Account Number: Budget Amendment Type? What is the nature of the expenditure?One-Time Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital?Operating Fill In Item Description[s] Baseline Budget 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 0 1,200 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sub-Total $0 $1,200 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,200 $0 $0 $0 $0 Revenue and Ending Cash 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Ending Cash: Decrease (Increase)0 0 0 0 0 Ending Cash: Decrease (Increase)0 0 0 0 0 Grants/Contributions 1,200 0 0 0 0 General Fund Subsidy 0 0 0 0 0 New Revenue 0 0 0 0 0 Other 0 0 0 0 0 Total Revenue and Ending Cash $1,200 $0 $0 $0 $0 If previously discussed, date(s) of discussion: 001.000.61.557.20.41.00 Diversity Film Series expenditures New Item For Council To Consider Total Expenses Comments 001.000.367.00.000.00 Diversity Film Series. The first season of the Diversity Commission film series (running Oct 2017 to Apr 2018) yielded $500 in sponsorship fees from Rick Steves' Europe and $480 in attendee donations. Two screenings of the Film Series' second season will occur this year, likely yielding another $200+ in donations. The total revenue expected this year is approximately $1200. This amendment is to allow expenditure of this revenue to cover film series production costs, which exceed $1000. Economic Development/Community Services GENERALCommunity Services Fund Name:Diversity Film Series Patrick Doherty 7.2.a Packet Pg. 465 Attachment: 2018 3rd Quarter Budget Amendment Ordinance (Third Quarter 2018 Budget Amendment) EXHIBIT “E”: New Items for Council to Consider (October 2018) 14 Budget Amendment for:Third Quarter Item Description: Department: Division: Title: Preparer: Department Account Number: Budget Amendment Type? What is the nature of the expenditure?One-Time Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital?Operating Fill In Item Description[s] Baseline Budget 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 0 (13,000)0 0 0 0 0 23,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sub-Total $0 $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 Revenue and Ending Cash 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Ending Cash: Decrease (Increase)10,000 0 0 0 0 Ending Cash: Decrease (Increase)0 0 0 0 0 Grants/Contributions 0 0 0 0 0 General Fund Subsidy 0 0 0 0 0 New Revenue 0 0 0 0 0 Other 0 0 0 0 0 Total Revenue and Ending Cash $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 001.000.66.518.30.11.00 Salaries - Unpaid time, 3 months If previously discussed, date(s) of discussion: Salaries- 2 (1/2 time) positions for 3 months New Item For Council To Consider Custodial Staffing, Temporary/Seasonal Labor - Two long-term medical leaves of absence from senior members of the custodial staff has left the Facilities division in need of immediate support. We are asking for two temporary Custodian positions to be funded to bridge the gap in labor hours due to the long term medical leaves. Unpaid status for one of the two employee frees salary costs to afford a portion of the expense for temporary labor. Public Works GENERALFacilities Fund Name:Custodial Staffing, Temporary Labor Thom Sullivan Total Expenses Comments 001.000.39.508.00.00.00 7.2.a Packet Pg. 466 Attachment: 2018 3rd Quarter Budget Amendment Ordinance (Third Quarter 2018 Budget Amendment) EXHIBIT “E”: New Items for Council to Consider (October 2018) 15 Budget Amendment for:Third Quarter Item Description: Department: Division: Title: Preparer: Department Account Number: Budget Amendment Type? What is the nature of the expenditure?One-Time Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital?Operating Fill In Item Description[s] Baseline Budget 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 7,500 3,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sub-Total $7,500 $3,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 Revenue and Ending Cash 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Ending Cash: Decrease (Increase)3,000 0 0 0 0 Ending Cash: Decrease (Increase)0 0 0 0 0 Grants/Contributions 0 0 0 0 0 General Fund Subsidy 0 0 0 0 0 New Revenue 0 0 0 0 0 Other 0 0 0 0 0 Total Revenue and Ending Cash $3,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 If previously discussed, date(s) of discussion: 001.000.66.518.30.12.00 Overtime New Item For Council To Consider Total Expenses Comments 001.000.39.508.00.00.00 Custodial Staffing, Overtime - The current service level for Facilities demands 240 hours per week when just 160 hours is available with current staffing (less in the event of illness or vacation). Additional overtime is requested to temporarily bridge the gap in labor hours. Public Works GENERALFacilities Fund Name:Custodial Staffing, Overtime Thom Sullivan 7.2.a Packet Pg. 467 Attachment: 2018 3rd Quarter Budget Amendment Ordinance (Third Quarter 2018 Budget Amendment) EXHIBIT “E”: New Items for Council to Consider (October 2018) 16 Budget Amendment for:Third Quarter Item Description: Department: Division: Title: Preparer: Department Account Number: Budget Amendment Type? What is the nature of the expenditure?One-Time Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital?Operating Fill In Item Description[s] Baseline Budget 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 200 10,200 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sub-Total $200 $10,200 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,400 $0 $0 $0 $0 Revenue and Ending Cash 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Ending Cash: Decrease (Increase)10,200 0 0 0 0 Ending Cash: Decrease (Increase)0 0 0 0 0 Grants/Contributions 0 0 0 0 0 General Fund Subsidy 0 0 0 0 0 New Revenue 0 0 0 0 0 Other 0 0 0 0 0 Total Revenue and Ending Cash $10,200 $0 $0 $0 $0 If previously discussed, date(s) of discussion: 001.000.66.518.30.41.00 Professional Services - McKinstry Corp New Item For Council To Consider Total Expenses Comments 001.000.39.508.00.000.00 Facilities Condition Assessment - McKinstry Corporation is conducting a three- year study to assess and grade the condition of the City-owned properties. The Finance Department asked for this study to be concluded one year earlier. Our request funds the remainder of the assessment (anticipated in 2019) to complete the study in 2018. Public Works GENERALFacilities Fund Name:Facilities Assessment Thom Sullivan 7.2.a Packet Pg. 468 Attachment: 2018 3rd Quarter Budget Amendment Ordinance (Third Quarter 2018 Budget Amendment) EXHIBIT “E”: New Items for Council to Consider (October 2018) 17 Budget Amendment for:Third Quarter Item Description: Department: Division: Title: Preparer: Department Account Number: Budget Amendment Type? What is the nature of the expenditure?One-Time Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital?Operating Fill In Item Description[s] Baseline Budget 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 City Hall 0 35,000 0 0 0 0 0 60,000 0 0 0 0 0 13,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sub-Total $0 $108,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $108,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 Revenue and Ending Cash 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Ending Cash: Decrease (Increase)108,000 0 0 0 0 Ending Cash: Decrease (Increase)0 0 0 0 0 Grants/Contributions 0 0 0 0 0 General Fund Subsidy 0 0 0 0 0 New Revenue 0 0 0 0 0 Other 0 0 0 0 0 Total Revenue and Ending Cash $108,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 Public Safety & Fire New Item For Council To Consider Fire Panels - Fire panels in multiple location suffering from compatability and compliance issues discovered during routine inspection. Monitored life safety systems are a function of the City's facilities and the use of devices to accomplish this requires replacement or upgrade of panes, the installation of new systems and the improvement of existing systems to comply. See Attached. Public Works GENERALFacilities Fund Name:Fire Panels Thom Sullivan Museum If previously discussed, date(s) of discussion: Total Expenses Comments 001.000.39.508.00.00.00 7.2.a Packet Pg. 469 Attachment: 2018 3rd Quarter Budget Amendment Ordinance (Third Quarter 2018 Budget Amendment) EXHIBIT “E”: New Items for Council to Consider (October 2018) 18 Budget Amendment for:Third Quarter Item Description: Department: Division: Title: Preparer: Department Account Number: Budget Amendment Type? What is the nature of the expenditure?One-Time Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital?Operating Fill In Item Description[s] Baseline Budget 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 0 23,000 0 0 0 0 0 23,000 0 0 0 0 0 28,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sub-Total $0 $74,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $74,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 Revenue and Ending Cash 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Ending Cash: Decrease (Increase)74,000 0 0 0 0 Ending Cash: Decrease (Increase)0 0 0 0 0 Grants/Contributions 0 0 0 0 0 General Fund Subsidy 0 0 0 0 0 New Revenue 0 0 0 0 0 Other 0 0 0 0 0 Total Revenue and Ending Cash $74,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 001.000.66 Equipment 594.18.64.00 Repair and Maintenance 518.30.48.00 If previously discussed, date(s) of discussion: Building 594.18.62.00 New Item For Council To Consider Security Measures - Camera monitoring deters and documents (potentially reducing liability associated with) criminal or malicious activity. Monitored panic buttons and security panels installed as uniform and monitored 24/7 by third- party. Lock down rooms as active intruder locations per Tacoma risk management training and recommendation. Public Works GENERALFacilities Fund Name:Security Measures Thom Sullivan Total Expenses Comments 001.000.39.508.00.00.00 7.2.a Packet Pg. 470 Attachment: 2018 3rd Quarter Budget Amendment Ordinance (Third Quarter 2018 Budget Amendment) EXHIBIT “E”: New Items for Council to Consider (October 2018) 19 Budget Amendment for:Third Quarter Item Description: Department: Division: Title: Preparer: Department Account Number: Budget Amendment Type? What is the nature of the expenditure?One-Time Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital?Operating Fill In Item Description[s] Baseline Budget 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 5,000 3,800 0 0 0 0 1,661,359 (3,800)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sub-Total $1,666,359 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,666,359 $0 $0 $0 $0 Revenue and Ending Cash 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Ending Cash: Decrease (Increase)0 0 0 0 0 Ending Cash: Decrease (Increase)0 0 0 0 0 Grants/Contributions 0 0 0 0 0 General Fund Subsidy 0 0 0 0 0 New Revenue 0 0 0 0 0 Other 0 0 0 0 0 Total Revenue and Ending Cash $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 This amendment will provide additional budget in 2018 for staff overtime. The initial 2018 overtime budget has been used to maintain progress on the implementation of the Trakit permit software and miscellaneous inspection effort on construction projects. The additional amount will be off-set in salary savings related to positions that were not immediately filled, because of difficulties in recruiting qualified candidates. Public Works GENERALEngineeringFund Name:Overtime Rob English Total Expenses New Item For Council To Consider If previously discussed, date(s) of discussion: 001.000.67.518.21.12.00 Overtime 001.000.67.518.21.11.00 Salaries/Wages Comments 7.2.a Packet Pg. 471 Attachment: 2018 3rd Quarter Budget Amendment Ordinance (Third Quarter 2018 Budget Amendment) EXHIBIT “E”: New Items for Council to Consider (October 2018) 20 Budget Amendment for:Third Quarter Item Description: Department: Division: Title: Preparer: Department Account Number: Budget Amendment Type? What is the nature of the expenditure?One-Time Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital?Capital Fill In Item Description[s] Baseline Budget 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 0 55,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sub-Total $0 $55,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $55,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 Revenue and Ending Cash 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Ending Cash: Decrease (Increase)(55,000)0 0 0 0 Ending Cash: Decrease (Increase)55,000 0 0 0 0 Grants/Contributions 0 0 0 0 0 General Fund Subsidy 0 0 0 0 0 New Revenue 0 0 0 0 0 Other 55,000 0 0 0 0 Total Revenue and Ending Cash $55,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 112.000.397.95.001.00 Comments 112.000.68.508.30.00.00 112.502.68.508.30.00.00 Total Expenses 112.502.68.597.95.55.12 Interfund Transfer This amendment will transfer $55,000 in traffic impact fees to pay for the pre- design study for the 76th Ave/220th St. Intersection Improvements. The costs can be reimbursed by traffic impact fees since it is a concurrency project and was included in the traffic impact fee calculation. Public Works STREET CONSTRUCTION Engineering Fund Name:76th Ave/220th St. Intersection Improvements Rob English New Item For Council To Consider If previously discussed, date(s) of discussion: 7.2.a Packet Pg. 472 Attachment: 2018 3rd Quarter Budget Amendment Ordinance (Third Quarter 2018 Budget Amendment) EXHIBIT “E”: New Items for Council to Consider (October 2018) 21 Budget Amendment for:Third Quarter Item Description: Department: Division: Title: Preparer: Department Account Number: Budget Amendment Type? What is the nature of the expenditure?One-Time Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital?Capital Fill In Item Description[s] Baseline Budget 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 10,000 12,800 0 0 0 0 10,000 (3,000)0 0 0 0 12,000 32,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sub-Total $32,000 $41,800 $0 $0 $0 $0 $73,800 $0 $0 $0 $0 Revenue and Ending Cash 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Ending Cash: Decrease (Increase)0 0 0 0 Ending Cash: Decrease (Increase)0 0 0 0 0 Grants/Contributions 0 0 0 0 0 General Fund Subsidy 0 0 0 0 0 New Revenue 32,130 0 0 0 0 Other 9,670 0 0 0 0 Total Revenue and Ending Cash $41,800 $0 $0 $0 $0 This amendment provides an adjustment for the final close-out cost on the 228th St. Corridor Improvements Project. The contractor submitted invoices that previously had not been provided for construction work paid on a time and material payment method. The cost will be paid by grant funds. Public Works STREET CONSTRUCTION Engineering Fund Name:228th St. Corridor Improvements Rob English Total Expenses New Item For Council To Consider If previously discussed, date(s) of discussion: 112.000.68.542.33.41.67-Interfund Services 112.000.68.595.33.65.41-Prof Serv Roadway 112.000.68.595.33.65.00-Const Roadway 112.000.333.20.205.08 FED Comments 112.000.334.03.800.00 TIB 7.2.a Packet Pg. 473 Attachment: 2018 3rd Quarter Budget Amendment Ordinance (Third Quarter 2018 Budget Amendment) EXHIBIT “E”: New Items for Council to Consider (October 2018) 22 Budget Amendment for:Third Quarter Item Description: Department: Division: Title: Preparer: Department Account Number: Budget Amendment Type? What is the nature of the expenditure?One-Time Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital?Operating Fill In Item Description[s] Baseline Budget 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 0 3,333 0 0 0 0 0 27,020 0 0 0 0 0 3,333 0 0 0 0 0 27,020 0 0 0 0 0 3,333 0 0 0 0 0 27,020 0 0 0 0 Sub-Total $0 $91,059 $0 $0 $0 $0 $91,059 $0 $0 $0 $0 Revenue and Ending Cash 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Ending Cash: Decrease (Increase)30,353 0 0 0 0 Ending Cash: Decrease (Increase)30,353 0 0 0 0 Ending Cash: Decrease (Increase)30,353 0 0 0 0 General Fund Subsidy 0 0 0 0 0 New Revenue 0 0 0 0 0 Other 0 0 0 0 0 Total Revenue and Ending Cash $91,059 $0 $0 $0 $0 Utility Rate and GFC Study Michele (Mike) De Lilla New Item For Council To Consider If previously discussed, date(s) of discussion: Total Expenses Interfund Services 423.000.75.535.80.41.67 Prof Services Engr 423.000.75.535.80.41.30 Interfund Services 422.000.72.531.70.41.67 Prof Services Engr 422.000.72.531.90.41.20 Interfund Services 421.000.74.534.80.41.67 Prof Services Engr 421.000.74.534.80.41.10 Study to review current utility and General Facility Charge (GFC) Rates and determine future GFC and utility rates so that funding is available for our future Capital Projects. In addition, our utility funding reserves and policies will be reviewed and updated. Public Works WATER Engineering Fund Name: Comments 423.000.75.508.00.00.00 422.000.72.508.00.00.00 421.000.74.508.00.00.00 7.2.a Packet Pg. 474 Attachment: 2018 3rd Quarter Budget Amendment Ordinance (Third Quarter 2018 Budget Amendment) EXHIBIT “E”: New Items for Council to Consider (October 2018) 23 2018 Decision Package Third Quarter Item Description: Department: Division: Title: Preparer: Department Account Number: Strategic Plan Task Action Item: Budget Amendment Type? What is the nature of the expenditure?One-Time Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital?Operating Fill In Item Description[s] Baseline Budget 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 6,000 2,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sub-Total $6,000 $2,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $8,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 Revenue and Ending Cash 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Ending Cash: Decrease (Increase)2,000 0 0 0 0 Ending Cash: Decrease (Increase)0 0 0 0 0 Grants/Contributions 0 0 0 0 0 General Fund Subsidy 0 0 0 0 0 New Revenue 0 0 0 0 0 Other 0 0 0 0 0 Total Revenue and Ending Cash $2,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 New Item For Council To Consider 422.000.72.531.90.41.00 Professional Services A new opportunity to particpiate in a stormwater commerical series arose and staff acted quickly to partipcate in the fast-moving project. As one of 36 jurisdictions that participated, we were able to get storm water messaging to a signaifcantly larger audience than we have beena ble to reach in the past. The three 30-second commericald aired through-out western Washignton and the City will own a copy of each to use on City TV broadcast, City events, on social media, etc. Public Works STORMEngineeringFund Name:NPDES Phase II Permit Compliance Zachary Richardson If previously discussed, date(s) of discussion: Total Expenses Comments 422.000.72.508.00.00.00 7.2.a Packet Pg. 475 Attachment: 2018 3rd Quarter Budget Amendment Ordinance (Third Quarter 2018 Budget Amendment) EXHIBIT “E”: New Items for Council to Consider (October 2018) 24 Budget Amendment for:Third Quarter Item Description: Department: Division: Title: Preparer: Department Account Number: Budget Amendment Type? What is the nature of the expenditure?One-Time Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital?Capital Fill In Item Description[s] Baseline Budget 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 0 3,185 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sub-Total $0 $3,185 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,185 $0 $0 $0 $0 Revenue and Ending Cash 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Ending Cash: Decrease (Increase)3,185 0 0 0 0 Ending Cash: Decrease (Increase)(3,185)0 0 0 0 Grants/Contributions 0 0 0 0 0 General Fund Subsidy 0 0 0 0 0 New Revenue 0 0 0 0 0 Other 3,185 0 0 0 0 Total Revenue and Ending Cash $3,185 $0 $0 $0 $0 1% for the Arts (2018 Sewer Repl, Phase 6) Michele (Mike) De Lilla New Item For Council To Consider If previously discussed, date(s) of discussion: Total Expenses 423.000.75.597.73.55.17 Interfund Transfer 1% for the Arts transfer to account for new sewer pipe and appurtenances that were constructed as part of the 2018 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Project. Public Works SEWER / TREATMENT PLANT Engineering Fund Name: 117.200.397.73.411.00 Comments 423.000.75.508.00.00.00 117.200.64.508.40.00.00 7.2.a Packet Pg. 476 Attachment: 2018 3rd Quarter Budget Amendment Ordinance (Third Quarter 2018 Budget Amendment) EXHIBIT “E”: New Items for Council to Consider (October 2018) 25 Budget Amendment for:Third Quarter Item Description: Department: Division: Title: Preparer: Department Account Number: Budget Amendment Type? What is the nature of the expenditure?One-Time Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital?Capital Fill In Item Description[s] Baseline Budget 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 40,462 30,000 0 0 0 0 120,000 50,000 0 0 0 0 1,473,000 375,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sub-Total $1,633,462 $455,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,088,462 $0 $0 $0 $0 Revenue and Ending Cash 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Ending Cash: Decrease (Increase)455,000 0 0 0 0 Ending Cash: Decrease (Increase)0 0 0 0 0 Grants/Contributions 0 0 0 0 0 General Fund Subsidy 0 0 0 0 0 New Revenue 0 0 0 0 0 Other 0 0 0 0 0 Total Revenue and Ending Cash $455,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Expenses Comments 423.000.75.508.00.00.00 Additional funds to cover work done as part of the 2018 Sanitary Sewer Replacement project that took place on Edmonds Street east of 7th Ave. Area of work was within an area of peat soil that complicated construction even more than what was expected. Public Works SEWER / TREATMENT PLANT Engineering Fund Name:2018 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Project (Phase 6) Michele (Mike) De Lilla Interfund Services 423.000.75.535.80.41.67 Construction 423.000.75.594.35.65.30 If previously discussed, date(s) of discussion: Professional Services 423.000.75.594.35.65.41 New Item For Council To Consider 7.2.a Packet Pg. 477 Attachment: 2018 3rd Quarter Budget Amendment Ordinance (Third Quarter 2018 Budget Amendment) EXHIBIT “E”: New Items for Council to Consider (October 2018) 26 Budget Amendment for:Third Quarter Item Description: Department: Division: Title: Preparer: Department Account Number: Budget Amendment Type? What is the nature of the expenditure?One-Time Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital?Operating Fill In Item Description[s] Baseline Budget 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 0 39,566 0 23,000 23,000 23,000 0 0 0 0 0 0000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Sub-Total $0 $39,566 $0 $23,000 $23,000 $23,000 $39,566 $0 $0 $0 $0 Revenue and Ending Cash 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Ending Cash: Decrease (Increase)39,566 0 23,000 23,000 23,000 Ending Cash: Decrease (Increase)0 0 0 0 0 Grants/Contributions 0 0 0 0 0 General Fund Subsidy 0 0 0 0 0 New Revenue 0 0 0 0 0 Other 0 0 0 0 0 Total Revenue and Ending Cash $39,566 $0 $23,000 $23,000 $23,000 Comments 001.000.39.508.00.00.00 MyBuildingPermit Leif Bjorback If previously discussed, date(s) of discussion: Total Expenses 001.000.62.524.20.41.00 MyBuildingPermit New Item For Council To Consider Participate in the MyBuildingPermit portal. This service is a regional permitting consortium providing comprehensive and coordinated access to permitting to share best practices, align on building standards, and develop materials to help customers navigate the permitting process. This will provide a seamless online portal to internal Edmonds permit review and issuance, integrating with the new Trakit system. Ongoing system costs are expected to be $23,000 per year. Development Services GENERALBuildingFund Name: 7.2.a Packet Pg. 478 Attachment: 2018 3rd Quarter Budget Amendment Ordinance (Third Quarter 2018 Budget Amendment) City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 10/16/2018 Mayor's Recommendation on the Edmonds Street Waterfront Connector Project Staff Lead: Phil Williams Department: Engineering Preparer: Megan Luttrell Background/History On July 28, 2015, Council unanimously moved to emphasize and prioritize near term solutions for waterfront access. On October 20, 2015, Council unanimously authorized a Professional Services Agreement with Tetra Tech for the Edmonds Waterfront Analysis Project. On November 15, 2016, Council unanimously moved to add the Edmonds Street Waterfront Connector Project (the Connector) to the CIP. On December 5, 2017, Council authorized a Professional Services Agreement with Parametrix for the project. On April 4, 2018, staff presented an update on project progress. On August 28, 2018, staff presented an update on project progress. On September 18, 2018, a Public Hearing was held on the Edmonds Street Waterfront Connector. Staff Recommendation The Mayor will provide a recommendation on the preferred alternative. Narrative This presentation and recommendation follows the public hearing at City Council as part of the alternatives evaluations for the Edmonds Street Waterfront Connector Project. The purpose of this presentation is to provide: · A review of project history, public and advisory input; · A summary of the current design and cost reduction efforts, including; o Narrowing the Landbridge width crossing the tracks o Removing the cantilevered overlook o Simplifying the bridge cross section, and o Shifting the bridge alignment eastward · The Mayor’s Recommendation, and presentation of the preferred alternative. 8.1 Packet Pg. 479 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 10/16/2018 2019 Budget Presentations Staff Lead: Scott James Department: Administrative Services Preparer: Scott James Department Budget Presentations Staff Recommendation N/A Narrative Mayor submitted his recommended 2019 Budget to the Council on October 9th. Departments present their budget requests for Council review and consideration of the Budget and possible amendments that will result in an adopted 2019 Edmonds City Budget. The 2019 Proposed Budget can be found at the City of Edmonds website at: http://www.edmondswa.gov/images/COE/Government/Departments/Administrative_Services/Finance/ Budget/2019/2019_Preliminary_Budget.pdf The 2019 Budget Presentations are scheduled as follows: October 16th: Public Works Utilities, Street, Public Works Administration, Facilities Maintenance, Equipment Rental and Engineering. October 23th: 1. Economic Development; 2. Development Services; 3. Parks; 4. Human Resources; 4. City Attorney and 5. Municipal Court. November 5th: 1. Police Department; 2. City Clerk; 3. Mayor’s Office, Council; 4. Finance & Information Services and 5. Non-departmental. November 13th: Revenue Sources. November 20th: Public Hearing on Preliminary 2019 Budget and Public Comment. November 20th: 8.2 Packet Pg. 480 Public Hearing on Property Tax Resolution and Ordinance Adoption and Public Comment. November 27th: Final Public Hearing on the 2019 Budget and Public Comment. November 27th: 2019 Budget Review and/or Adoption of the 2019 Budget. December 4th: 2019 Budget Review and Adoption of the 2019 Budget (if necessary). 8.2 Packet Pg. 481 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 10/16/2018 Discussion on Prohibiting Expanded Polystyrene (EPS or “Styrofoam”) in Food Packaging Staff Lead: Steve Fisher/Adrienne Fraley-Monillas Department: City Council Preparer: Maureen Judge Background/History The Edmonds City Council adopted Resolution 1357 on April 16, 2016 which adopts both Zero Waste Washington’s and the State of Washington’s “Beyond Waste Plan” as long-term goals to eliminate waste and pollution in the extraction, manufacture, transportation, storage, use, reuse and recycling of materials. Expanded polystyrene (EPS or “Styrofoam”) breaks down into smaller pieces but does not fully biodegrade and pollutes the Puget Sound and other area waterways. In the interest of public health as well as the environment, the Council is asked to consider prohibiting expanded polystyrene (EPS) by food and beverage service providers (e.g., restaurants, fast food providers, cafes, convenience markets, delicatessens, coffee shops, schools, hospitals, grocery store take-out food counters, vending trucks or other businesses selling prepared food and beverages for consumption on or off the premises within the Edmonds city limits. Many municipalities--including Seattle, WA, currently have EPS/Styrofoam bans in effect: New York City (and several other cities in New York), Takoma Park, MD, Washington DC, Miami Beach, FL, Freeport and Portland Maine, and Nantucket Massachusetts. Staff Recommendation Steve Fisher, Recycling Coordinator in Public Works recommends the Council move forward to prohibit the use of expanded polystyrene (EPS) by food and beverage service providers. Narrative Council will discuss prohibiting (EPS/Styrofoam) in food packaging. The intent of this discussion and possible future ordinance is to put forth notice to the citizens and food service businesses of Edmonds that in January 2020, an ordinance prohibiting EPS/Styrofoam in Edmonds will be established. Training and guidance on the Styrofoam ban for local businesses will be provided by City of Edmonds staff. Attachments: 2018-09-17 styrofoam ban ordinance 8.3 Packet Pg. 482 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING A BAN ON THE USE OF EXPANDED POLYSTYRENE BY FOOD SERVICE BUSINESSES WITHIN THE CITY. WHEREAS, the City of Edmonds Climate Change Action Plan states our vision by 2050 as: “Edmonds is one of many flourishing communities in the Puget Sound region of Western Washington with our energy coming from nearly 100% renewable sources, our waste streams approaching zero, and nearly all our products and services obtained from sustainable sources,” and; and WHEREAS, item B.4 in Edmonds’ Comprehensive Plan states: “Promote a healthy community by seeking to protect and enhance the natural environment through a balanced program of education, regulation, and incentives. Environmental programs in Edmonds should be tailored to and reflect the unique opportunities and challenges embodied in a mature, sea-side community with a history of environmental protection and awareness,”; and WHEREAS, the Edmonds City Council adopted Resolution 1357 on April 16, 2016 which adopts both Zero Waste Washington’s and the State of Washington’s “Beyond Waste Plan” as long-term goals to eliminate waste and pollution in the extraction, manufacture, transportation, storage, use, reuse and recycling of materials; and WHEREAS, these goals can be supported through strategies, policies and action plans that significantly reduce waste and pollution; and WHEREAS, “Expanded polystyrene,” as defined below, breaks down into smaller pieces but does not fully biodegrade, and is polluting the Puget Sound and other area waterways; and WHEREAS, the City of Edmonds desires to protect the integrity of the natural environment, fish and wildlife from litter and pollution caused by expanded polystyrene; and WHEREAS, the City intends to improve the environment, in part, by prohibiting the use of certain types of expanded polystyrene within the City; and 8.3.a Packet Pg. 483 Attachment: 2018-09-17 styrofoam ban ordinance (Discussion on Prohibiting Expanded Polystyrene (EPS or “Styrofoam”) in Food Packaging) WHEREAS, this Ordinance will serve in the interest of public health safety as well as the environment in an effort to reduce litter and pollutants onto the land and the waters of the city and beyond; and WHEREAS, notifying the local food industry now of the expanded polystyrene ban that will take effect in 2020 will provide the food industry a fair opportunity to use up their current supplies of expanded polystyrene and order supplies of compostable alternative products before the ordinance banning the expanded polystyrene products takes effect; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. A new chapter 6.90 of the Edmonds City Code, entitled “Expanded Polystyrene Prohibition,” is hereby adopted to read as follows: 6.90.010 Definitions. 6.90.020 Expanded Polystyrene Prohibition. 6.90.030 Violations. 6.90.010 Definitions. For purposes of this chapter, the following definitions shall apply. A. "Expanded polystyrene" means blown polystyrene and expanded and extruded foams (sometimes called Styrofoam, a Dow Chemical Co. trademarked form of polystyrene foam insulation) which are thermoplastic petrochemical materials utilizing a styrene monomer and processed by any number of techniques including, but not limited to, fusion of polymer spheres (expandable bead polystyrene), injection molding, foam molding, and extrusion-blow molding (extruded foam polystyrene). B. "Expanded polystyrene food service products" means food containers, plates, "clamshells," hot and cold beverage cups, meat and vegetable trays, egg cartons, and other products, made of expanded polystyrene and used for selling or providing food for consumption on or off the premises. 8.3.a Packet Pg. 484 Attachment: 2018-09-17 styrofoam ban ordinance (Discussion on Prohibiting Expanded Polystyrene (EPS or “Styrofoam”) in Food Packaging) C. "Food service businesses" means full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafes, delicatessens, coffee shops, grocery stores, retail food vendors, home delivery services, non- profit food providers, vending trucks or carts, business or institutional cafeterias, or other businesses, selling or providing food within the City of Edmonds for consumption on or off the premises. 6.90.020 Expanded Polystyrene Prohibition. A. Effective January 1, 2020, food service businesses in the City of Edmonds shall be prohibited from selling or providing food in expanded polystyrene food service products; nor shall any food service business purchase, obtain, or possess any expanded polystyrene food service products, except as otherwise provided under subsections B. In addition, the following requirements shall apply to food service products that are used: i. All disposable food service products shall be either compostable or recyclable, and ii. To qualify as compostable or recyclable, disposable food service products must be considered compostable or recyclable by the solid waste collection provider that services the subject property. B. Prepackaged soups and other prepackaged foods that food service businesses sell or otherwise provide to their customers in expanded polystyrene food service products that have been filled and sealed prior to receipt by the food service business shall be exempt from the prohibition established in subsection A. 6.90.030 Violations. A violation of any provision of this chapter shall constitute a Class I civil infraction pursuant to Chapter 7.80 RCW. Issuance and disposition of infractions issued for violations of this chapter shall be in accordance with Chapter 7.80 RCW. The penalty for violation of a provision of this chapter shall be $100.00. The penalty for a second or subsequent offense in violation of the provision of this chapter within two years of any previous offense shall be $250.00. 8.3.a Packet Pg. 485 Attachment: 2018-09-17 styrofoam ban ordinance (Discussion on Prohibiting Expanded Polystyrene (EPS or “Styrofoam”) in Food Packaging) Section 2. Severability. If any section, subsection, clause, sentence, or phrase of this ordinance should be held invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance is subject to referendum and shall take effect thirty (30) days after final passage of this ordinance. APPROVED: MAYOR DAVE EARLING ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY: BY JEFF TARADAY FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE DATE: ORDINANCE NO. 8.3.a Packet Pg. 486 Attachment: 2018-09-17 styrofoam ban ordinance (Discussion on Prohibiting Expanded Polystyrene (EPS or “Styrofoam”) in Food Packaging) 5 SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. __________ of the City of Edmonds, Washington On the ____ day of ___________, 2018, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed Ordinance No. _____________. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting of the title, provides as follows: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING A BAN ON THE USE OF EXPANDED POLYSTYRENE BY FOOD SERVICE BUSINESSES WITHIN THE CITY. . The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request. DATED this _____ day of ________________, 2018. CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY 8.3.a Packet Pg. 487 Attachment: 2018-09-17 styrofoam ban ordinance (Discussion on Prohibiting Expanded Polystyrene (EPS or “Styrofoam”) in Food Packaging) City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 10/16/2018 Council Committee Reports and Minutes Staff Lead: Council Department: City Clerk's Office Preparer: Scott Passey Background/History N/A Staff Recommendation N/A. For information only. Narrative This is an opportunity for Councilmembers to report on items discussed at their committee meetings held the previous week. The committee meeting minutes are attached. Attachments: FC100918 PPW100918 PSPP100918 9.1 Packet Pg. 488 Minutes FINANCE COMMITTEE MEETING October 9, 2018 _________________________________________________________________________________ Elected Officials Present Staff Present Councilmember Dave Teitzel (Chair) Scott James, Finance Director Councilmember Diane Buckshnis Dave Turley, Assistant Finance Director Mayor Dave Earling (portion of meeting) Jeff Taraday, City Attorney Shane Hope, Development Services Director Jerrie Bevington, Recorder The meeting was called to order at 7:20 p.m. in the Jury Meeting Room. Renewal of the City Attorney Contract was added to the agenda. 3. Renewal of the City Attorney Contract Councilmember Teitzel referred to the existing Agreement for Legal Services which expires in December 31, 2018 and includes a flat fee of $41,000/month which under the terms of the contract increased by 4% each year. He reviewed preliminary data points with regard to the contract renewal including the base fee for Lighthouse 2015-2022, annual increases in contracted City Attorney rates in Lynnwood and Issaquah, increase in City employee salaries/benefits 2016-2018, CPI-U for Seattle/Tacoma/Bremerton 2016-2018, and Edmonds union contract rate increases 2017-2020. Mr. Taraday explained Lighthouse’s flat per month fee for legal services with Edmonds is unique; other cities pay a retainer and hourly attorney fees. The flat fee is similar to an in-house legal department in that the City does not take on the risk of litigation costs. The flat fee also aligns the interests of the law firm with the City; Lighthouse has an incentive to keep the City out of trouble and litigate efficiently. He concluded the flat per month fee has worked well for both parties. Discussion followed regarding whether the data points were relevant, difficulty comparing professional services and staff salaries, determining the total that other cities pay for contract attorney services, the City’s legal expenditures prior to contracting with Lighthouse, how the existing Lighthouse base rate was determined, predictability of the flat fee rate, information provided in the City Attorney’s annual report, CPI-U forecast, and minimal changes to the contract. Committee members were supportive of renewing the City Attorney contract and the 4% annual increase. Action: Schedule on Consent Agenda 2. Third Quarter 2018 Budget Amendment Mr. James reviewed:  $117,612 in revenue  $875,871 in new expenses  Third quarter budget amendments: 1. Funding from First Responder Flex Fund Project for social worker to assist individuals/households identified as high risk for chemical dependency or mental health issues or to abate an emergency situation 2. Reimbursable Police Department overtime – special events 3. Reimbursable Police Department overtime – DNDO Drill 4. Reimbursable Police Department overtime – pedestrian safety activities 9.1.a Packet Pg. 489 Attachment: FC100918 (Council Committee Reports and Minutes) 10/09/18 Finance Committee Minutes, Page 2 5. Holiday Market revenue and expenditures 6. Diversity Film Series 7. Custodial staffing, temporary/seasonal labor due to long term medical leaves of absence 8. Custodial staff overtime related to above 9. Complete the Facility Condition Assessment in 2018 10. Fire panels in multiple locations 11. Security measures – cameras, panic buttons, security panels, lock down rooms 12. Engineering staff overtime 13. Transfer traffic impact fees to fund pre-design study for 76th Ave/220th St intersection improvements 14. Adjustment for final closeout cost on the 228th St Corridor Improvement Project 15. Study to review current Utility and General Facilities Charge Rates 16. Stormwater commercial 17. 1% for the Arts transfer for new sewer pipe and appurtenances constructed as part of the 2018 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Project 18. Additional work done on Edmonds Street as part of the 2018 Sanitary Sewer Replacement 19. Participate in MyBuildingPermit portal Mr. James responded to Council questions regarding the amendments. Ms. Hope provided details regarding the MyBuildingPermit system and savings it will provide. Action: Schedule for full Council The meeting was recessed at 8:04 p.m. and reconvened at 8:10 p.m. 1. August 2018 Monthly Financial Report Committee members and staff discussed leading economic indicators such as softening of the housing market and car sales, and the decrease in building permits and whether these were predictors of a downturn. Mr. Turley and Mr. James highlighted:  Sales tax and property tax revenues are ahead of last year o Sales tax forecast: $8.1 million in 2018, not expected to continue at that rate in 2019  Expenditures lower than revenues but higher compared to last year  Building structure permits are down  Fund 012 made interfund loans to Fund 104 (drug enforcement) and to Fund 112 due to grants not yet received Staff responded to questions regarding LEOFF Medical Insurance Reserve expenditures, establishing a minimum and maximum on long term care expenditures, having an actuarial study conducted on LEOFF members, decrease in building permits, Lynnwood Mazda (in Edmonds) adding Hyundai, non- traffic infraction penalty revenue, source of First Responder grant, advertising expenditures, expenditures from the Park Construction Fund, and developing a policy for budgeting for capital projects. Committee requested City Attorney expenditures for Lighthouse and the prosecutor be reported separately. Action: Schedule on Consent Agenda The meeting was adjourned at 8:34 p.m. 9.1.a Packet Pg. 490 Attachment: FC100918 (Council Committee Reports and Minutes) Minutes PARKS & PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE MEETING October 9, 2018 Elected Officials Present Staff Present Councilmember Neil Tibbott (Chair) Phil Williams, Public Works Director Councilmember Kristiana Johnson Rob English, City Engineer Carrie Hite, Parks & Recreation Director Jeannie Dines, Recorder The meeting was called to order at 7:25 p.m. in the Council Chambers. “Park Updates” was added to the agenda. 1. Street Dedication at 18807 88th Ave W Mr. English reported a 3-lot short plat has been proposed at the southeast corner of 88th and 188th. The street right-of-way on 88th is 20 feet and the street map requires 30 feet which will require a 10-foot street dedication, a total of 240 square feet of dedication. Discussion followed regarding the location of the sidewalk, the joint utility easement for private utilities, and the developer providing the street dedication. Action: Schedule on Consent Agenda 2. Pedestrian Easement at 8609 244th St SW Mr. English reported this is a proposed multi-family development, 3 separate buildings with 11 units on the north side of 244th west of Hwy 99. A portion of the sidewalk must be widened onto private property to provide a 5-foot clearance behind the mailbox installation. Total dedication is ½ foot by 7 feet. Action: Schedule on Consent Agenda 3. Street Dedication at 7922 180th St SW Mr. English explained the property owner at 7922 180th St SW proposed dedicating a portion of his property (1,235 square feet) for a sidewalk and installation of a bench dedicated to his late wife. The City is interested in installing a sidewalk on 80th Ave W and 180th St SW once funding is secured. Staff found the dedication worthwhile and recommends it be accepted. Discussed followed regarding timeframe for building the sidewalk, grant application submitted to a WSDOT bike and pedestrian program, estimated cost in the TIP, benefits of a sidewalk in this location, the property remaining large enough for a single family residence, staff working with the property owner to determine the bench location and the City paying the $2000-2500 cost of the bench. Action: Schedule on Consent Agenda 5. Park Updates Councilmember Tibbott referred to an email received last week regarding needles in parks and around a school and asked if that was staff’s experience. Ms. Hite advised staff has not seen an increase in encampments and/or needles other than one encampment at Pine Ridge Park a couple years ago. Mr. Williams all the locations cited in the email, except Pine Ridge Park, were in Lynnwood. The Public 9.1.b Packet Pg. 491 Attachment: PPW100918 (Council Committee Reports and Minutes) 10/09/18 PPW Committee Minutes, Page 2 Works shop is located at 210th & 76th and he has not seen what the person described in that area and Public Works crews have not reported any issues. He has asked Recycling Coordinator Steve Fisher to follow up with Lynnwood Public Works and Park staff. Councilmember Johnson relayed she heard that the tidegate to the Edmonds Marsh was closed on Friday, October 5th. It was her understanding the tidegate was to remain open this year for the purposes of the study. Mr. Williams explained the tidegate was closed to avoid flooding from expected 11+ foot tides. The tidegate has been open all summer and has remained open later this year than usual. Councilmember Johnson suggested staff confer with Maureen Judge, the coordinator for that study. Her understanding was the tidegate would remain open, and the consultant would do quarterly inventories of salinity as well as fish and fowl. Discussion followed regarding funds in the 2019 budget for the final 25% of the Beach Place pump station which will prevent flooding and allow the tidegate to remain open. the marsh study looking at the storm drains under SR104, creeks/culverts that cross that property, past discussions about installing new culverts, the State adding those to their list of culvert projects, issues with the grade and culverts filling with silt. Councilmember Tibbott inquired about trash accumulating around bus stops, recalling Community Transit was not interested in installing trash cans. Mr. Williams assumed Community Transit did not want the responsibility of emptying the cans. Neither he nor Ms. Hite have seen an accumulation of litter or heard any complaints. Action: Discussion only. 4. Five Corners Reservoir Recoating Project Update Mr. English explained the Five Corners site contains a 3 million-gallon (MG) reservoir built in 1979 and a 1.5MG reservoir built in 1960; both were recoated in 1994. He described unanticipated conditions that have been encountered in the current recoating project in the 1.5MG tank:  Exterior steel delamination o Required 490 repairs o $37,000 additional cost  Interior corrosion pit repairs o Structural engineer recommends repair to maintain structural seismic integrity o Pits were present under recoating done in 1994 o No additional corrosion since 1994 recoating o Repair ongoing, total cost unknown, likely over $100,000  Rafter to roof-plate gap due to plate unevenness and plat lapping o Will make best effort to sandblast and recoat, modifications meet code o Roof may need to be replaced earlier than entire tank o May need to be monitored every five years  Extra Work Items (estimated cost) 1. Charge order #1 = $1,343 2. Change order #2 = $45,853 3. Change order #3 = $2,067 4.Pending CO's (estimated) = $21,500 Total = $70,763 5. Corrosion Pit Repairs = TBD  Five Corners Reservoir Recoating Project Description Original Budget Construction Contract $2,822,374 Management Reserve $282,200 9.1.b Packet Pg. 492 Attachment: PPW100918 (Council Committee Reports and Minutes) 10/09/18 PPW Committee Minutes, Page 3 Construction Management $366,900 Permits $5,500 Total $3,476,974  Issues: o Cost to complete corrosion pit repairs in the interior of the 1.5MG reservoir o Extended roof life of 1.5MG reservoir o Condition of the 3MG reservoir  Corrosion, delamination or other? o Schedule to complete 3MG reservoir o Budget Mr. English and Mr. Williams responded to questions and discussion followed regarding the normal cycle for recoating (20-25 years), conversations that will occur with the contractor regarding specs and pricing, timing for beginning and completing recoating of the 3MG reservoir, potential operational issues if the 3MG tank is not complete by summer, changes to the project over time due to seismic/structural issues, whether recoating of the 3MG reservoir could be delayed, whether work could begin on the interior of the 3MG tank before the exterior, whether the interior could be completed in the winter and the recoating done the next year, whether the tank could be recoated while full, and anticipation a change order will be necessary to increase the management reserve. Action: Update only The meeting was adjourned at 8:20 p.m. 9.1.b Packet Pg. 493 Attachment: PPW100918 (Council Committee Reports and Minutes) Minutes PUBLIC SAFETY, PERSONNEL & PLANNING COMMITTEE MEETING October 9, 2018 Elected Officials Present Staff Present Councilmember Tom Mesaros (Chair) Phil Williams, Public Works Director Councilmember Adrienne Fraley-Monillas Mary Ann Hardie, HR Director The meeting was called to order at 7:24 p.m. in the Police Training Room. 1. WWTP Job Descriptions Mr. Williams explained these two job descriptions, Senior WWTP Instrument Technician/Plant Electrician and Senior WWPT Laboratory Technician, were developed over a year ago and at the union’s request, were included in negotiations and the newly approved contract for 2018-2020. The intent was to recognize the expertise and increase in the scope/responsibility of existing employees Dan Korstad and Jeanne McKenzie. Discussion included hiring at the journey-level if the positions were vacated, tasks these individuals perform, when the existing job descriptions were adopted, retroactivity to the date the contract was ratified by the union, retention of the journey-level job description, tenure of the existing employees and language in the job descriptions. Action: Schedule on Consent Agenda The meeting was adjourned at 7:32 p.m. 9.1.c Packet Pg. 494 Attachment: PSPP100918 (Council Committee Reports and Minutes)