Interlocal Agreement with Mountlake Terrace for Joint Use of Sewage Disposal Facilities-i LLB i ll J
S
AGREEMENT FOR THE JOINT USE OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL FACILITIES 0L '
BY THE CITIES OF EDMONDS AND MOUNTLAKE TERRACE
THIS AGREEMENT, made and executed this day of
between the CITY OF EDMONDS, a municipal corporation of the State of Washington,
hereinafter referred to as "Edmonds," and the CITY OF MOUNTLAKE TERRACE, a municipal
corporation of the State of Washington, hereinafter referred to as "Mountlake,"
W I T N E S S E T H:
WHEREAS, on February 28, 1959, Edmonds and Mountlake did enter into an
agreement for the construction and joint use of certain sanitary sewage disposal
facilities, including a lift station, force main and trunk sewer to be owned and
operated by Mountlake, and a trunk sewer, outfall sewer and sewage treatment plant
to be owned and operated by Edmonds; and
WHEREAS, the said agreement established, among other things, the apportion—
ment of capital costs for which each party,would be responsible; and
WHEREAS, under the said agreement Edmonds advanced the amount of approxi—
mately $252,700.00 of capital costs for which Mountlake was to be responsible,
subject to the agreed intent that said capital costs thereafter would be repaid to
Edmonds, together with accrued interest, through a monthly surcharge on Mountlake
sanitary sewage delivered to Edmonds; and
WHEREAS, the amount of said capital reimbursement surcharge was established
as $15.00 per million gallons of sewage delivered by Mountlake to Edmonds, on the
assumption that such a surcharge would repay to Edmonds the said capital costs,
plus accrued interest, within the term of the revenue bonds issued by Edmonds to
finance the said capital costs; and
WHEREAS, under conditions actually experienced subsequent to the entering
into of said agreement, the said capital reimbursement surcharge has proved
entirely insufficient for the timely repayment to Edmonds of the said capital costs
for which Mountlake -is responsible; and
WHEREAS, on September 15, 1961, Mountlake and Edmonds did enter into an
agreement which provided for the construction and joint use of a trunk sewer
extending along the westerly side of Lake Ballinger, and established a capital cost
surcharge to be paid by Edmonds to Mountlake Terrace as reimbursement for a prorata
of Mountlake's cost of construction of its Lake Ballinger lift station and pressure
pipeline in 1959; and
WHEREAS, the future proportionate use of the said lift station and pressure
pipeline will differ from that contemplated in the said agreement of September 15,
1961; and ,
WHEREAS, the large increases in the number of persons served by the Edmonds
treatment plant have resulted in a complete overtaxing of the plant sludge digestion
facilities, necessitating construction of new sludge disposal facilities by Edmonds
in 1967 at a substantial cost to Edmonds; and
WHEREAS, by reason of the large increases in sewage flows which already have
occurred and the substantial further increases which are anticipated, construction
of an additional plant expansion must be undertaken early in 1971; and
WHEREAS, by reason of changes in requirements by State agencies relating to
discharge of sanitary wastes into Puget Sound, extension and modification of the
Edmonds sewer outfall must be undertaken early in 1971; and
WHEREAS, by reason of these and of other unforeseen circumstances and events,
the said agreements of February 28, 1959, and of September 15, 1961, no longer are
deemed suitable nor adequate to fulfill either the original intent or the present
and future needs of the parties thereto;
NOW, THEREFORE, and in consideration of the promises and the mutual covenants
contained herein, the said parties HEREBY ENTER INTO A NEW AGREEMENT AS FOLLOWS:
Section I. Definition of Terms. The following words and phrases as used
in this contract shall have the meanings hereinafter set forth in this section:
(a) The terms "Joint Sewerage Facilities" or "Joint System" shall mean all
of the facilities heretofore constructed or to be constructed and used jointly by
Edmonds and Mountlake for transporting, treatment and/or disposal of sanitary
sewage wastes.
(b) The terms "Joint Sewerage Service Area" or "Joint Service Area" shall
mean the area ultimately contemplated to be served through the joint sewerage
facilities, as described hereinafter and as indicated on Exhibit A, attached hereto,
and by this reference incorporated herein.
Cc) The term "Capital Costs" shall include all costs of actual construction,
together with costs of acquisition of real property and/or rights -of -way, engineering
design and inspection fees, costs of preparation of construction contract documents,
legal costs directly related to the acquisition of rights -of -way, and the disposition
2
of claims incident to construction, but shall exclude any bond discount or similar
financing costs incurred by the parties. Wherever the term "capital costs" occurs,
it shall mean the costs as herein defined less,the pro rata of any applicable State
and/or Federal construction grant.
(d) The term "Operation and Maintenance Costs" shall mean all costs of labor,
power, chemicals, equipment, material, supplies, insurance premiums, water, light,
telephone and gas charges, contract services, and other work and materials directly
chargeable to operation and maintenance, to which shall be added an amount equal to
ten per cent (10%) of all such costs as reimbursement for civic burden and responsi-
bility and for that portion of the costs of general city administrative and super-
visory services and other indirect miscellaneous costs applicable to such operation
and maintenance.
(e) The term "Sanitary Sewage" or the term "Sewage" shall mean all water -
carried domestic, commercial and industrial wastes normally collected in a sanitary
sewerage system.
(f) The term "Treatment Plant" or"Sewage Treatment Plant" shall mean the
existing sewage treatment plant of the City of Edmonds and any additions thereto
and improvements thereof which may be hereafter constructed or installed.
(g) The.term "Outfall Sewer" shall mean the existing sewer and submarine
pipeline transporting liquid effluent from the Edmonds sewage treatment plant to
point of discharge into deep water in Puget Sound, and any additions thereto and
improvements thereof which hereafter may be constructed or installed.
(h) The abbreviation "MG" shall mean million gallons of sewage quantity.
U ) The abbreviation "MGD" shall mean a rate of flow which would result in
one million gallons per day of sewage quantity.
(j) The term "annual average 24-hour flow" shall mean the total flow of
sewage in millions of gallons during a full calendar year in which the joint sewer
facilities shall have been used, divided by the number of days in such year; and
shall be expressed in MGD.
(k) The term "monthly maximum flow" shall mean the total flow of sewage in
millions of gallons divided by the total number of days in that month during which
the greatest volume of flow occurs, in any given calendar year; and shall be
expressed in MGD.
(1) The term "weekly maximum flow" shall mean one -seventh of the total flow
of sewage in millions of gallons occurring during the week of maximum aggregate flow
3
in any given calendar year, and shall be expressed in MGD; provided, that should
this flow result from abnormal and temporary conditions subsequently corrected,
the said flow shall be appropriately adjusted. The term "week" herein shall not
refer to calendar week, but shall represent the 7-day periods covered by individual
7-day charts of the recording meters at the various meter stations. For proper
correlation, the charts in all meter stations shall be changed on the same day, on
a regular schedule, at as nearly the same time as practicable.
(m) The term "24-hour maximum flow" shall mean the total flow of sewage in
millions of gallons during that day in each calendar year in which the greater
volume of flow in one day occurs; and shall be expressed in MGD; provided, that
should an abnormal flow occur on any one day due to temporary conditions which are
subsequently corrected, then such abnormal flow shall not be considered.
(n) The term "12-hour maximum flow" shall mean the total flow of sewage in
millions of gallons during the 12 consecutive hours of maximum flow occurring
during the "24-hour maximum flow," multiplied by two to be expressed in MGD.
(o) The term "I -hour maximum flow" shall mean the total flow of sewage in
millions of gallons during the one hour of maximum flow occurring during the
11I2-hour maximum flow," multiplied by 24 to be expressed in MGD.
(p) The term "customer" shall mean a "single family residence" and/or an
"equivalent customer," defined as follows:
(1) The term "single family residence" shall mean one structure, all
connected and under the same roof, located on a lot or tract of real property
having a separate and individual property description, with no other structure
used for human occupancy located on that tract or lot, and which structure is used
as a single family dwelling.
(2) The term "equivalent customer" shall apply to all users other than
"single family residences" which are served into the joint sewerage system. The
number of "equivalent customer" units assigned to any user (such as apartment houses,
motels, schools, hospitals, nursing homes, and other public and/or commercial
establishments) shall in principle be the ratio of (a) monthly volume of waste water
received from said user to (b) the average volume of waste water received from a
typical single family residence. To serve as a practicable basis for computing the
number of "equivalent customer" units served into the joint system, a list of types
of users and the corresponding "equivalent customer" ratings is attached hereto as
Appendix B.
4
Section 2. Nomenclature and Description of Units of Joint Sewerage Facilities.
The various elements of the joint system shall be designated as follows:
Unit 7A - The existing 24-inch diameter trunk sewer (Ballinger Trunk)
constructed jointly by Edmonds and Mountlake in 1962 pursuant to the joint use agree-
ment dated September 15, 1961.
Unit 8 - The existing sewage lift station constructed by Mountlake at the
southerly end of Lake Ballinger in 1959, and presently operated by Mountlake.
Unit-9 - The existing 18-inch diameter pressure pipeline constructed by
Mountlake in 1959 along 244th Street S.W. from the said lift station (Unit 8) to its
point of discharge into a gravity trunk sewer (Unit 10) at Highway 99.
Unit 10 - The existing gravity trunk sewer constructed by Mountlake in
1959 along Edmonds Way from Highway 99 to 98th Avenue West in Edmonds, the most
southerly 1,115 lineal feet thereof being 30-inch diameter pipe and the remainder
being of 24-inch diameter pipe.
Unit II - The existing 24-inch and 30-inch gravity trunk sewer constructed
by Edmonds in 1959 from the end of Unit 10 at 98th Avenue West along Edmonds Way and
Fifth Avenue in the City of Edmonds to Elm Street, thence westerly on Elm Street and
northerly to existing treatment plant of the City of Edmonds at Second Avenue and
Dayton Street.
Unit 12 - The original sewage treatment plant at Second Avenue and Dayton
Street in Edmonds, as it existed on February 28, 1959.
Unit 12A - The existing 36-inch diameter sewer outfall extending a distance
of approximately 1,800 lineal feet from the Edmonds sewage treatment plant into deep
salt water, and constructed by Edmonds in 1959.
Unit 12B - The modifications and additions to the original Edmonds sewage
treatment plant (Unit 12) as constructed by Edmonds in 1959 to expand the original
plant capacity for service to Mountlake under the joint use agreement of February 28,
1959.
Unit 12C - The modifications and additions to the Edmonds sewage treatment
plant as constructed by Edmonds in 1967 for conversion from sludge digestion to a
sludge thickening and incineration process for sewage sludge disposal.
Unit 12D - The additions to the Edmonds sewage treatment plant as scheduled
for construction in 1971 to increase plant capacity to meet present and future needs.
Unit 12E - The extension and modification of the existing 36-inch diameter
sewer out -fall as scheduled for construction in 1971, in compliance with changes in
5
requirements by State agencies.
Meter Stations A, B, C, D & E. - The existing metering stations which serve
to measure and record sewage flows into Units 8, 10 and 7A, situated as indicated on
the Service Area Map comprising Appendix A.
Section 3. Ownership and Operating Resaonsibilily for Individual Units of the
Joint_System. The ownership and operational responsibility of each party for individual
units of the joint sewerage system shall be as follows:
Unit 7A shall continue to be owned and operated by Edmonds.
Units 8 and 9 shall continue to be owned, operated and maintained by
Mountlake. Any expansions or additions thereto shall be constructed, owned, operated
and maintained by Mountlake.
Unit 10, heretofore constructed, owned and operated by Mountlake, shall be
transferred to jurisdiction, operation and maintenance by Edmonds, effective on the
date of this agreement.
Unit II shall continue to be owned, operated and maintained by Edmonds.
Units 12, 12A, 12B and 12C shall continue to be owned, operated and
maintained by Edmonds.
Units 12D and 12E shall be constructed by Edmonds and thereafter shall be
owned, operated and maintained by Edmonds.
Mountlake.
Meter Stations A, B, D and E shall be owned, operated and maintained by
Meter Station C shall be transferred to ownership by Edmonds, but shall
continue to be operated and maintained by Mountlake.
Section 4. Reapportionment of Capital Costs of Individual Units of Joint
System. Effective January I, 1971, a reapportionment of the capital cost of each
unit of the joint sewerage system, plus applicable accrued interest, shall be made
between Edmonds and Mountlake in direct proportion to the percentages of the total
capacity of each said unit which are utilized by each party. The method of deter-
mining the percentages of the total capacity of each unit deemed to be utilized by
each party under this Section shall be as follows:
a. For Units 7A, 8, 9, 12A and 12E, the aforesaid percentages of capacity
use shall be equivalent to the ratios that the sewage flows of each party bear to the
total sewage flows in each unit. For purposes of this section the term "sewage flow"
shall mean "monthly maximum flow," as defined in preceding Section (1).
!:
b. For Units 10 and II, by reason of a lack of appropriate metering of
related sewage flows therein, the applicable percentages of capacity use shall be
deemed as proportionate to the number of customers of each party served by this trunk
sewer, calculated as set forth hereinafter in Appendix D.
c. For Units 12, 12B, 12C and 12D, the aforesaid percentages of capacity
use shall be deemed equivalent to the combined weighted ratios of the sewage flows
and the number of customers of each party served by the Edmonds treatment plant,
calculated from the following formula:
P = (0.75) (q/Q) + (0.25) (n/N)
in which:
P = Percentage of capacity use of plant by said party.
q = Monthly maximum sewage flow of said party to plant.
Q = Monthly maximum total sewage flow to plant.
n = Number of customers of said party served by plant.
N = Total number of customers served by plant.
The capital costs which are to be reapportioned in accordance with this Section
shall be as set forth in Appendix C of this agreement. The monthly maximum flows to
be utilized in calculation of the aforesaid percentages of capacity use shall be as
set forth in Appendix D. The numbers of customers to be utilized in calculation of
the aforesaid percentages of capacity use shall be as set forth in Appendix E. The
resultant reapportionment of capital costs shall be as computed in Appendix F. The
said monthly maximum flows, numbers of customers served, and the reapportionment of
capital costs shall be reviewed periodically, as provided for in a subsequent section
of the agreement.
Section 5. Determination of Mountlake's Reimbursable Cost Balance for Unit 7A.
The formula set forth in Section 6 of the joint agreement of September 5, 1961, for
prorating of the cost of the Ballinger Trunk Sewer (Unit 7A) is hereby abrogated; and
in lieu thereof Mountlake shall become responsible for a reimbursable cost balance for
Unit 7A computed as (a) that proportion of the original capital cost of Unit 7A corres-
ponding to the ratio which Mountlake's sewage flow in Unit 7A bears to the total sewage
flow in Unit 7A, less (b) that portion of the original capital cost of said Unit 7A
heretofore paid to Edmonds by Mountlake under the terms of the joint agreement of
September 15, 1961, computed as twenty-five per cent (25%) of the said original capital
cost, plus (c) applicable interest on said capital cost balance from January I, 1962,
to December 31; 1970. The determination of Mountlake's reimbursable capital cost
balance in Unit 7A shall be as set forth in Appendix I.
7
Section 6. Determination of Reimbursable Capital Cost Balances for Units 8,
9, 12, 12A and 12B. A compilation shall be made of capital reimbursement payments
made by Mountlake to Edmonds and by Edmonds to Mountlake, to December 31, 1970, under
the terms of prior joint sewerage agreements, as follows:
a. Payments by Mountlake to Edmonds pursuant to the joint agreement -of
February 28, 1959;
(1) Subsection 6(c) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 9.25/MG of Sewage
(2) Section 7 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r 5.75/MG of Sewage
$15.00/MG of Sewage
b. Payments by Edmonds to Mountlake under the joint agreement of September
15, 1961, consisting of $2,000.00 per annum.
These said payments then shall be applied to the reapportioned capital costs,
with a determination made as to which portions of the said payments shall constitute
payments upon principal, and which shall constitute payments of interest on the
declining principal balance. The reimbursable capital cost balance owed by each
party as of December 31, 1970, then shall be computed from the reapportioned capital
costs, plus accrued interest, less applicable payments made.
The determination of Edmonds' reimbursable balance for Units 8 and 9 shall be
as set forth in Appendix G.
The determination of Mountlake's reimbursable capital balance for Units 12, 12A
and 12B shall be as set forth in Appendix H.
Section 7. Determination of Edmonds' Reimbursable Capital Cost Balance for
Unit 10. The formula set forth in subsection 13(a) of the joint agreement of February
28, 1959, for sharing by Edmonds of capital costs of Unit 10 trunk sewer is hereby
abrogated; and in lieu thereof Edmonds shall become responsible for a reimbursable
capital cost balance therein, computed as a cost apportionment proportional to the
number of customers of each party served through Unit 10, as set forth in Appendix F,
plus accrued interest thereon at the effective interest rate, from the initial financ-
ing date to December 31, 1970. The determination of Edmonds' reimbursable capital
cost balance in Unit-10 shall be as set forth in Appendix T.
Section 8. Determination of Mountlake's Reimbursable Capital Cost Balance
for Unit II. The formula set forth in subsection 13(b) of the joint agreement of
February 28, 1959, for capital cost reimbursement by Mountlake for Unit II trunk sewer
when 24-hour maximum flows from Mountlake exceed 3 MGD (which have occurred each year
L
since the winter of 1965-66) is hereby abrogated; and in lieu thereof Mountlake
shall become responsible for a reimbursable capital cost balance for Unit 11
computed as (a) an apportionment of the original capital cost of Unit II in pro-
portion to the number of Mountlake customers served through Unit 11, less (b) that
portion of cost of construction of Unit 11 previously paid to Edmonds by Mountlake,
plus (c) accrued interest on the difference of (a) - (b) at the effective interest
rate of the applicable revenue bonds, from the initial financing date to December
31, 1970. The determination of Mountlake's reimbursable capital cost balance in
Unit II shall be as set forth in Appendix I.
Section 9. Establishment of Single Capital Cost Reimbursement Surcharge
to be Paid to Edmonds by Mountlake. Effective January I, 1971, the parties
hereto shall terminate payments of the following:
a. Capital reimbursement surcharge of $15.00 per MG of sewage, required
to be paid to Edmonds by Mountlake under the joint sewerage agreement of February
28, 1959.
b. The capital reimbursement payment of $2,000.00 per year required
to be paid to Mountlake by Edmonds under the joint sewerage agreement of September
15, 1961.
In lieu of the said discontinued surcharges and/or payments, Mountlake shall
make to Edmonds monthly capital reimbursement payments equal to no less than one -
twelfth of that annual sum which is deemed sufficient to amortize within a period
of twenty years from January I, 1971, the net balance of capital costs owed to
Edmonds on December 31, 1970, plus applicable interest on the declining balance
thereof until paid in full. This annual sum shall be as calculated in Appendix K.
The aforesaid monthly capital cost payments shall be made coincident with
original payments of operation and maintenance costs, as provided for hereinafter.
Section 10. Civic Burden Surcharge. Edmonds' acceptance of sanitary sewage
wastes from Mountlake for treatment and disposal constitutes a continuing serious
responsibility and a civic burden not adequately compensated by Mountlake's payments
of its prorata share of operation and maintenance costs as provided for herein.
9
Elements of such civic burden include problems of offensive odors originating from
sewage transported from Mountlake, a degradation of the receiving waters of Puget
Sound contiguous to the Edmonds waterfront, aggravation of pollution and/or nuisances
resulting from unavoidable plant malfunctions, sewage bypassing and overflows. In
consideration thereof, Mountlake heretofore has paid to Edmonds a related monthly
surcharge equal to $5.00 per MG of sewage delivered to Edmonds. However, during the
period since inception of joint sewerage system operations, Edmonds has developed
extensive sewerage facilities connecting into the Ballinger Lift Station (Unit 8);
and the related service requirements likewise constitutes a continuing responsibility
and civic burden to Mountlake in the following respects:
a. Hazards of pollution of Lake Ballinger in event of mechanical and/or
electrical failure in the pumping plant.
b. Problems of station odors offensive to nearby residents.
c. A very exacting responsibility for maintenance and operation of
Meter Stations A, B, C, D and E, the compilation of flow records and calculation of
monthly costs applicable to each party.
The aforesaid civic burden aspects of the two parties are partially off—
setting. Further, the factor of ten per cent (10%) added to actual costs in computing
"Operation and Maintenance Costs", pursuant to Section I(d) herein, may be reasonably
expected to derive revenues in excess of applicable unreimbursed indirect costs for
which the said factor was established; and said excess therefore may be deemed as a
Civic Burden reimbursement, which is reasonably and equitably proportioned between
the parties under the agreed formula for computing and payment of Operation and
Maintenance Costs.
It is therefore agreed that the monthly payment of $5.00 per MG of sewage
heretofore made by Mountlake to Edmonds as a "Civic Burden" surcharge therefore
shall be discontinued as of December 31, 1970.
Section II. Payment of Operation and Maintenance Costs_ Each operating
entity shall make payments of all operation and maintenance costs of units for which
it has operating responsibility, and reimbursement shall be made for certain portions
of such costs in accordance with the following provisions of this subsection:
a. By February 15 of each year commencing in 1971, Mountlake shall prepare
and furnish to Edmonds the following:
(I) A tabulation of all flows through Meter Stations A, B, C, D, and E
IN
during the preceding calendar year, by weeks, with a summary of the total flows
for which each party is responsible.
(2) A summary of the actual operating and maintenance costs incurred
during the preceding calendar year for Units 8 and 9 and for Meter Stations A, B, C,
D and E, including an amount equal to ten per cent (10%) thereof, as provided for in
foregoing Section I(d) of this agreement.
(3) A calculation of the average cost per MG calculated by dividing
the said total operating and maintenance costs by the total million gallons of sewage
flow through Units 8 and 9 for the said preceding calendar year.
(4) A calculation of Edmonds' prorata of the said operating and
maintenance costs for the preceding calendar year, which shall be in direct propor-
tion to the ratio that Edmonds' aggregate flow bears to the total aggregate flow,
through Units 8 and 9, during the said calendar year.
(5) A calculation of the difference between (1) Edmonds' said prorata
of operating and maintenance costs and (2) the aggregate of monthly payments there-
tofore made (or credits allowed to Mountlake therefor) by Edmonds for the said
preceding calendar year.
(6) A summary of the number of sewer customers of Mountlake (including
Ronald Sewer District) as of December 31 of the preceding calendar year, segregated
by the Meter Stations through which they are served.
b. By March I of each year Edmonds shall prepare and furnish to Mountlake
the following:
(1) A summary of the total sewage flows through the treatment plant
(Units 12, 12B, 12C, 12D), by weeks, comprised of the same 7-day periods covered by
individual 7-day charts from Meter Stations A, B, C, D.and E.
(2) A summary of the actual operating and maintenance costs incurred
during the preceding calendar year for those units of the joint sewerage system under
its jurisdiction, including an amount equal to ten per cent (10%) thereof, as provided
for in foregoing Section I(d) of this agreement, and segregated as follows:
(a) Unit 7A (Ballinger Trunk)
(b) Unit 10 (East Edmonds Way Trunk)
(c) Unit II (West Edmonds Way Trunk)
(d) Units 12-12E, Inclusive (Treatment plant and outfall)
(3) A summary of the number of sewer customers of Edmonds (and Olympic
View Water District) as of December 31 of the preceding calendar year, segregated by
i
the individual units of the joint sewerage system through which they are served, as
listed in subsection (a) preceding.
(4) A calculation of Mountlake's prorata of the said operating and
maintenance costs for the preceding calendar year, which (a) for Units 10 and II
shall be in direct proportion to the ratio that the total number of customers of
Mountlake (including Ronald Sewer District) bears to the total number of customers
served through each of the said units, and (b) for Units 12 through 12E, inclusive,
and for Unit 7A, shall be in direct proportion, respectively, to the ratio that
Mountlake's aggregate flows (including flow from Ronald Sewer District) bear to the
total aggregate flows through the said units during the preceding calendar year.
(5) A calculation of the difference between (a) Mountlake's prorata
of the said operating and maintenance costs and (b) the aggregate of monthly payments
theretofore made Cor applicable credits allowed) for the preceding calendar year.
(6) A billing (or a credit statement, if overpayment has been made)
to Mountlake for the net balance of operating and maintenance costs owed for the
preceding calendar year.
c. Calibration of all sewer system flow meters prior to month of maximum
flow, furnishing of copies of monthly meter flow charts and joint reading monthly of
system meters shall be accomplished by engineering and/or maintenance and operation
personnel of each municipality to facilitate calculation and checking of prorata costs.
d. Commencing in March of each year, and continuing until the following
March, each party shall make monthly payments to the other, as reimbursement of oper-
ation and maintenance expenses, in an amount equal to one -twelfth (1/12) of its com-
puted prorata of the other party's operation and maintenance costs applicable to the
joint system, for the year last ended.
If mutually desired, monthly billings may be exchanged, and monthly pay-
ments made only by the party owing the greater amount, with said payments to be in
amount equal to the difference between the two said billings. Billings are to be
submitted on or about the first day of each month, and shall be payable within three
weeks thereafter.
Section II -A. Additional Maintenance and Operational Cost Payments and
Sewage Flow Adjustments. The City of Mountlake Terrace and the Ronald Sewer District
agree to provide sewer service to the Edmonds residents (II) on the south side of
12
Lake Ballinger and to the Olympic View Water District customers (14) in the
vicinity of 90th Avenue West and 89th Place West, north of 244th Street S.W.
based upon the following considerations:
(a) The City of Edmonds shall reimburse Mountlake Terrace at the
rate of $1.00 per month per customer for the eleven Lake Ballinger customers.
(b) Sewage flows from the eleven Lake Ballinger residents shall be
deducted from the total Mountlake Terrace flows involving the proration of capital
improvements costs,and the flows from the fourteen Olympic View Water District
residents shall be deducted from the Mountlake Terrace and Ronald Sewer District
sewage flows involving the proration of maintenance, operation and capital improve-
ment costs.
Section 12. Updating of Appendices Following Construction of Unit 12D. The
parties hereto do recognize that, for the intent of this agreement to be properly
and fairly fulfilled, the various appendices hereinafter listed and attached as an
integral part of this agreement must from time to time be carefully reviewed, updated
and reevaluated to accurately reflect pertinent changes in significant basic data
relating to this agreement, such as changes in numbers of customers and/or in
magnitudes of metered sewage flows which, if taken into account, would appreciably
alter the "percentages of capacity use" initially established for computation of
12-A
"reapportionment of capital costs by units" (Appendix F), reimbursable capital cost
balances of all units (Appendices G, H, L and J), and Mountlake's monthly payment for
capital cost reimbursement to Edmonds (Appendix K). The parties further recognize
that the accuracy of the initial determinations of "percentages of capacity use" on
the effective date of this agreement are necessarily limited by the following
deficiencies in flow data:
a. The total maximum monthly flow to the Edmonds treatment plant cannot
now be reliably measured, by reason that present peak flows exceed the hydraulic
capacity of the plant and its flow metering devices. Flow measurements necessary
for accurate determination of "percentages of capacity use" in the treatment plant,
as defined herein, must be deferred until after construction of the 1971 plant expan-
sion (Unit 12D), hereinbefore described.
b. The latest records of "maximum monthly flow" measurements at Meter
Stations D and E, taken during the 1969-70 winter months, are not deemed fairly
representative of "percentages of capacity use," by reason that (1) such measurements
did not fully reflect the sewage loading from Olympic View Water District customers,
who were still in the process of being initially connected, and (2) such measurements
included substantial overflows into Mountlake's sewers, from a major lift station
operated by City of Lynnwood, which station shortly is to be modified with a view
to eliminating such overflow.
The parties therefore concur in and accept the initial computations as set
forth in the various applicable appendices for the basic purpose of determining the
amount of Mountlake's monthly payments for capital cost reimbursement to Edmonds,
until such time that the flow data necessary for a proper and accurate determination
of percentages of capacity use can be secured. It is agreed that such data shall be
compiled by Edmonds promptly following the first December -January winter season
during which the new treatment plant metering facilities are in operation. At such
time, Edmonds shall appropriately update and amend the various appendices as follows:
Appendix C - revise the capital cost figures for Units 12D and 12E (and
the resultant cost totals) to reflect the actual costs of these units, in lieu of
the estimated costs initially shown.
Appendices D through K, inclusive - revise the figures therein to accu-
rately reflect the updated cost data and sewage flow data.
Updating and amending of the said Appendices shall be the responsibility of
Edmonds, and may be accomplished by either (1) the Edmonds City Engineer in collabora-
tion with the Mountlake City Engineer, or (2) through the employment of a qualified
13
consultant acceptable to both parties.
Costs thereof shall be shared between Edmonds and Mountlake in the same
proportion as the ratios of their respective total sewage flows to the Edmonds
plant.
Section 13. Periodic Review and Updating of Appendices. Following the
initial updating and amendment of the appendices to this agreement, they thereafter
shall be reviewed no less frequently than once in each five years, to determine
whether or not changes which may have occurred in numbers of customers and/or sewage
flows of either party warrant an adjustment in Mountlake's reimbursable capital cost
balance and the monthly payments made thereon. An interim review shall be made at
the request of either party at any time that an imbalance of 5 per cent or greater
in the last preceding capital cost apportionment may be deemed to exist as a result
of additional capital expenditures or in changes in capacity -use of joint facilities
by either party. Reviews may be made at any other time when mutually agreed upon by
both parties. The costs of said periodic, interim and/or mutually agreed upon reviews
shall be shared in the same manner as set forth for the initial updating and amendment.
The Appendices shall be reviewed and updated at any time upon submission of
written request by either party. However; in such instance that such review does not
constitute a periodic or interim review as provided for in the preceding paragraph, and
the need therefor is not concurred in by the other party, then the costs of the said
review are to be borne by the party initiating the request.
Section 14. Construction of Required Additional Joint Facilities. In the
event that additions or improvements to any unit of the joint facilities becomes
necessary for the continued satisfactory functioning of the joint system, whether as
a result of increased sewage loading, upgrading by State Agencies of standards of
sewage waste treatment and disposal, or similar reasons, the related costs and
responsibilities relating thereto shall be equitably borne by both parties in the
manner set forth following:
a. The party having jurisdiction, under the terms of this agreement, of
the joint system unit or units which require the said capital improvements shall be
responsible for the planning, financing and construction of the said improvements.
b. The other party thereupon shall become responsible for a fair prorata
of the resultant actual increase in capital cost, based upon the said other party's
"percentage of capacity use"in the expanded or improved facility, in the same manner
as herein applied to the pending 1971 construction of Units 12D and 12E.
C. In this event, Appendices C through K, inclusive, shall be amended
IA
to reflect properly the resulting changes in prorata capital cost accounts, and
in the amount of the monthly payments made by Mountlake for capital cost reimburse-
ment to Edmonds.
Section 15. Termination of Capital Cost Reimbursement Payments by Mountlake.
At such future time that Mountlake's reimbursable capital cost balance has been
completely repaid, the monthly capital cost reimbursement payments stipulated herein
shall be terminated. If thereafter a reimbursable cost balance becomes owed by
either party, as a result of applicable capital cost expenditures by the other, or
from changes in percentages of capacity use, a fair and equitable schedule of capital
cost reimbursement payments shall be reestablished by negotiation between the two
parties, in conformity with the basic principles and philosophy of this agreement.
Section 16. Construction and Operational Standards. In their common interest,
each party shall observe the highest practicable standards and practices in the cons-
truction, operation and maintenance of sewerage facilities, with a view to the
following:
a. Minimizing entry into the sewerage system of ground water and/or
surface water.
b. Maintaining a favorable character and quality of sewage, with elimin-
ation of septicity and objectionable odors, entry of petroleum wastes or other
chemicals and/or wastes detrimental to sewer lines, pumping stations, sewage treat-
ment plant and the final receiving waters in Puget Sound.
c. Maintaining an efficient and economical utility operation, while
achieving optimum pollution and environmental control.
Section 17. Approved Sewerage Service Areas. By this agreement Edmonds
hereby recognizes Mountlake's right to deliver to Edmonds through the joint sewerage
system any sanitary sewage of acceptable quality collected from (a) any part of its
incorporated area, including possible future annexations northerly to a common
boundary with the City of Lynnwood and/or easterly to a common boundary with the
City of Brier, (b) the present area served within the Ronald Sewer District,
including the Holyrood Cemetery property as used for cemetery purposes only, and/or
(c) any other areas or agencies which have been heretofore or may be hereafter
mutually agreed upon; and both parties agree that all such areas shall be considered
15
a part of Mountlake for purposes of this contract. Mountlake similarly recognizes
Edmonds' right to provide, through the joint sewerage system, sanitary sewer service
to (a) any part of its incorporated area, including future annexations, which is
logically tributary to the Edmonds' sewage treatment plant, (b) presently unincor-
porated additional areas lying within the boundaries of Olympic View Water District,
(c) presently unincorporated additional areas lying within the boundaries of
Alderwood Water District southerly of 208th Street S.W. and westerly of the City
limits of Mountlake, and/or (d) any other areas or agencies which have been hereto-
fore or may be hereafter mutually agreed upon; and both parties agree that all such
areas shall be considered a part of Edmonds for purposes of this contract.
The parties further agree that (a) Edmonds will not withhold approval for
Mountlake to provide sewerage service to limited areas within the southerly portion
of the City of Lynnwood and/or the westerly portion of the City of Brier, and (b)
Mountlake will not withhold approval for Edmonds to provide sewerage service to
limited incidental areas within the Town of Woodway and/or the northwesterly portion
of Ronald Sewer District, where provision of such service by Mountlake and/or Edmonds
is in the public good, and obviates need for construction of costly alternative or
duplicate facilities, and provided that the aggregate number of customers to be
served within the said incidental areas by either party does not exceed seven
hundred (700).
Section 18. Books and Accounts. Each party shall keep full and complete
books of accounts showing the operation and maintenance costs incurred in connection
with the joint facilities under its jurisdiction, and the portion thereof applicable
to each of the units operated and maintained by said party. The cost of keeping said
books shall be considered to be included in the 10% allowance set forth in Section I(d).
Either party may at any time request an audit of the books of the other party
showing the expenses of maintenance and operation; and the cost of such audit shall
be borne by the party initiating the request.
Section 19. Insurance and Liability for Damages. Edmonds and Mountlake
each shall maintain insurance on the respective project facilities owned and operated
by each, in an amount sufficient to enable the replacement or restoration of any such
facilities damaged as a result of casualties normally insured against by sewer
utilities operated in a reasonable and prudent manner. Each of such parties shall
lime
also maintain public liability insurance with bodily injury limitations of not
less than $100,000.00 per person and $300,000.00 per accident, and property damage
limitations of not less than $10,000.00 per claim and $20,000.00 per accident. The
cost of such insurance shall be considered a part of the cost of operation and main-
tenance of the respective facilities insured. Any liability incurred by either
party as a result of operation of that portion of the joint system owned and operated
by them shall be the joint liability and obligation of Edmonds and Mountlake, with
the cost thereof to be shared in the same proportion as the operation and maintenance
costs for the said portion of the joint system.
Section 20. Notice. Whenever in this agreement notice is required to be
given, the same shall be given by registered mail addressed to the party at the
following addresses:
City of Edmonds
Civic Center
Edmonds, Washington 98020
City of Mountlake Terrace
Civic Center
Mountlake Terrace, Washington 98043
unless a different address shall be hereafter designated in writing by either of
such parties.
The date of giving such notice shall be deemed to be the date of mailing
thereof. Billings for and payments of operation and maintenance costs may be made
by regular mail.
Section 21. Execution of Documents and Adoption of Resolutions and Ordinances.
Each party agrees that it will execute any and all instruments, documents and resolu-
tions or ordinances necessary to give effect to the terms of this contract.
Section 22. Effective Date. The effective date of this agreement shall be
retroactive to January I, 1971, notwithstanding that actual signing thereof, and/or
the adoption of supporting resolutions and ordinances may take place at some later
date.
Section 23. Term. This contract shall be in full force and effect until
February 28, 1999.
Section 24. Assignment. Neither of the parties hereto shall have the right
17
to assign this agreement or any of its rights and obligations hereunder, nor to
terminate its obligations hereunder by dissolution or otherwise, without first
securing the written consent of the other party, and this agreement shall be
binding upon and inure to the benefit of the respective successors and assigns
of the parties hereto.
Section 25. Waiver. No waiver by either party of any term or condition
of this agreement shall be deemed or construed as a waiver of any other term or
condition, nor shall a waiver of any breach be deemed to constitute a waiver of
any subsequent breach, whether of the same or a different provision of this agreement.
Section 26. Remedies. In addition to the remedies provided by law, \this
contract shall be specifically enforceable by either party.
Section 27. Entirety. This agreement merges and supersedes all prior
negotiations, representations and agreements between the parties hereto relating
to the subject matter hereof, and constitutes the entire contract between Edmonds
and Mountlake concerning the disposal of sewage by Mountlake and the acceptance
of such sewage by Edmonds for disposal and treatment.
Section 28. Arbitration Clause. In the event that any dispute shall arise
as to the -meaning of any of the provisions of this agreement, or to the proper
application thereof, and provided such dispute connot be mutually resolved, then
said dispute shall be submitted to a board of three arbitrators, one of whom shall
be selected by Edmonds and one by Mountlake, and the third selected jointly by the
first two; and the parties hereto agree that any decision of the said board of
arbitrators shall be binding upon both parties hereto, and the said parties shall
abide by the decision of the said board.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this agreement as of
the day and year first above written.
ATTEST: ,fir
City Cleyk
ATTEST:
City Clerk
CITY OF EDMONDS
BY
Mayor
CITY OF MOUNTLAKE TERRACE
By:,�
Mayor
12/14/70
AGREEMENT FOR THE JOINT USE OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL FACILITIES
BY THE CITIES OF EDMONDS AND MOUNTLAKE TERRACE
L I S T O F A P P E N D I C I E S
Appendix
No. Description
A Map of Joint Sewerage System Service Area
B Tabulation of "Equivalent Customer" Ratings
C Computation of Capital Costs by Units of Joint Sewerage System
D Determination of Percentages of Capacity Use of Units of Joint
Sewerage System
E-1 Tabulation of Acreages and Customers Served by Units of Joint
Sewerage System
E-2 Tabulation of Numbers and Ratios of Customers Served by Units of
Joint Sewerage System
F Reapportionment of Capital Costs by Units of Joint Sewerage System
G Summary of Capital Cost Payments by Edmonds for Use of Units 8 and 9
H Summary of Capital Cost Payments by Mountlake for Use of Units
12, 12A and 12B
I Determination of Reimbursable Capital Cost Balances for all Units
of Joint Sewerage System to December 31, 1970
J Summary of Reimbursable Capital Cost Balances on December 31, 1970,
for all Units of Joint Sewerage System
K Determination of Annual Payment by Mountlake for Capital Cost
Reimbursement to Edmonds
12/7/70
APPENDIX B
TABULATION OF "EQUIVALENT CUSTOMER" RATINGS
Type of Establishment
I. Single Family Residence
2. Multiple Family Residence, Duplex,
Apartment, Trailer Court
3. Hotel, Motel
4. Schools
a. Elementary
b. Junior High School
c. Senior High School
5. Commercial
a. Small shop, store or business
establishment
b. Supermarket (markets over
5,000 sq. ft.)
c. Restaurant
d. Tavern
e. Laundromat
f. Professional Office
g. Bowling Alley (exclusive of
restaurant)
h. Hospital, Nursing Home
6. Churches, Service Organizations,
Meeting Halls
"Equivalent Customer" Units
1.0
2.0/first two units + 0.7/each
additional unit
1.0 + 0.4/rental unit
1.0/30 students (Min. 4.0)
1.0/20 students (Min. 5.0)
1.0/15 students (Min. 6.0)
fus
4.0
3.0 + 1.0/each 20 seats over 40
16KI]
0.7/machine
1.0
1.0/each 10 lanes
2.0 + 0.4/bed
1.0
For any and all establishments not listed herein, the "Equivalent Customer"
units shall be computed as the quotient of the annual average monthly metered water
use in cubic feet divided by 700, and used to the nearest tenth; excepting that
reasonable allowance may be made for metered water which is used for sprinkling and/or
similar purposes not contributing to sewage flows; and provided that no establishment
shall be rated at less than one unit. The Aurora Village complex and the King's
Garden school campus may be computed on the monthly meter basis.
12/7/70
APPENDIX C
COMPUTATION OF CAPITAL COSTS BY UNITS
OF JOINT SEWERAGE SYSTEM
CONSTRUCTION
INDIRECT
TOTAL
FEDERAL
CAPITAL
UNIT
DESCRIPTION
CONTRACT
COST
COST
GRANT
NET COST
7A
Ballinger
Trunk Sewer
$ 120,021
$ 30,833
$ 150,854
-- $
150,854
8
Lake
Ballinger Pumping Station
103,780
20,756
124,536
$ 30,636*
93,900
9
Force
Main to Highway 99
42,007
8,401
50,408
12,408*
38,000
10
East
Edmonds Way Trunk
94,165
18,833
112,998
*
27,798
85,200
II
West
Edmonds Way Trunk
119,473
23,895
143,368
35,383*
107,985
12
Edmonds
Original Tr.Plant
--
--
--
--
1.35,000
12A
Edmonds
Outfall Sewer
66,781
13,356
80,137
*
19,777
60,360
12B
1959
Tr. Plant Expansion
63,439
12,688
76,127
18,787*
57,340
12C
1967
Tr. Plant Expansion
372,000
37,000
409,000
194,500R
214,500
12D
1 1971
Tr. Plant Expansion
592,000
158,500
750,500
361,000A
389,500
12E
1971
Outfall Extension
52,000
10,500
62,500
30,000A
32,500
TOTALS
*24.68% of Total Cost
RReceived April 1969
$1,625,666 $334,762 $1,960,428 $730,289 $1,365,139
AAnticipated upon completion of construction
12/22/70
APPENDIX D
DETERMINATION OF PERCENTAGES OF CAPACITY USE
OF UNITS OF JOINT SEWERAGE SYSTEM
UNIT 7A (Ballinger Trunk)
I. Criteria
Percentages of capacity use are to be equivalent to ratios of monthly
maximum flows.
2. Special Provisions
Most recent maximum monthly flows occurred in December 1969, at which time
the full flow impact from initial hook-up of tributary Olympic View customers had
not yet occurred. For purpose of interim determination of percentages of capacity
use, an assumption is made that Edmonds -Olympic View flows for December 1969 should
be increased by 15 per cent, as a reasonable projection of flow data to December 31,
1970.
3. Calculation of Percentages of Capacity Use (Projected to December 31, 1970)
Meter D Meter E
(Total Flow (Mountlake Flow
Item in Unit 7A) in Unit 7A)
a. Metered Flows in M.G.
Dec. 1-31, 1969, Incl. 15.123 4.1813
b. Projected Flow Increase
in M.G. from O.V.W.D. 1.641* ---
c. Projected Total M.G. 16.764 4.1813
d. Mountlake Percentage
of Capacity Use (E/D) 25%
e. Edmonds Percentage of
Capacity Use 75%
*(15%) (15.123 - 4.1813) = 1.641
**Potential increases in Mountlake flow deemed offset by planned elimination of
overflow from Lynnwood pumping station.
I IN I TC R R A
I. Criteria
Percentages of capacity use are to be equivalent to ratios of monthly
maximum flows.
2. Special Provisions
Most recent maximum monthly flows occured in December 1969, at which time
the full flow impact from initial hook-up of tributary Olympic View customers had
not yet occurred. For purpose of interim determination of percentages of capacity
use, an assumption is made that Edmonds -Olympic View flows for Decem-ber 1969 should
be increased by 15 per cent, as a reasonable projection of flow data to December 31,
1970.
2/15/71 9/30/71
Appendix D, continued.
3. Calculation of Percentages of Capacity Use (Projected to December 31, 1970).
Meters A+B+D Meters D-E
(Total Flow in (Edmonds Flow in
Item Units 8 & 9) Units 8 & 9)
a. Metered Flows in M.G.,
Dec. 1-31, 1969, Incl. 67.4683 10.9417
b. Projected Flow Increase
in M.G. from O.V.W.D. 1.641 1.641
c. Projected Total M.G. 69.1093 12.5827
d. Edmonds Percentage of
Capacity Use 20.9%
e. Mountlake Percentage of
Capacity Use 79.1%
UNIT 10
1. Criteria
Percentages of capacity use are to be equivalent to ratios of numbers of
customers served, in lieu of comparative monthly maximum flows, for the reason that
sewage flows from Olympic View Water District discharging directly into Unit 10
(East Edmonds Way Trunk) are not metered.
2. Calculation of Percentages of Capacity Use
a. Estimated numbers of customers served:
No. of
Per Cent
Agency
Customers
of Total
Mountlake (City)
4790
46.77
Mountlake (Ronald)
2150
20.99
Total Mountlake
6940
67.76
Edmonds (City)
1521
14.86
Edmonds (Olympic View)
1780
17.38
Total Edmonds
3301
32.24
z.
Grand Total
10,241
100.00
b. From the foregoing tabulation,
the percentages
of capacity use in
Unit 10 are as follows:
Mountlake
67.76%
Edmonds
32.24%
UNIT II
I. Criteria
Percentages of capacity use are to be equivalent to ratios of numbers of
cusommers served,in lieu of comparative monthly maximum flows, for the reason that
(2)
Appendix D, continued.
sewage flows from Olympic View Water District and City of Edmonds discharging directly
into Units 10 and II are not metered.
2. Calculation of Percentages of Capacity Use
a. Estimated numbers of customers served:
No. of
Per Cent
Agency
Customers
of Total
Mountlake (City)
4790
41.28
Mountlake (Ronald)
2150
18.53
Total Mountlake
6940
59.81
Edmonds (City)
1808
15.58
Edmonds (Olympic View)
2856
24.61
Total Edmonds
4664
40.19
Grand Total
11604
100.0
b. From the foregoing tabulation, the percentages of capacity use in
Unit II are as follows:
Mountlake 59.81%
Edmonds 40.19%
UNITS 12, 1213, 12C and 12D
I. Criteria
Percentages of capacity use are to be calculated from weighted ratios of
sewage flows and numbers of customers, by means of the formula
in which
P = (0.75) (q/Q) + (0.25) (n/N)
P = Percentage of capacity use of plant by the given party.
q = Monthly maximum sewage flow of the given party to the plant.
Q = Monthly maximum total sewage flow to the plant.
n = Number of customers of the given party served by the plant.
N = Total number of customers served by the plant.
2. Special Provisions
Prior to completion of the 1971 treatment plant expansion project (Unit 12D),
total monthly maximum flows to the treatment plant cannot be measured, for the reason
that winter -time peak flows exceed the present hydraulic capacity of the plant influent
channel and the present master flow meter. For purpose of interim determination of
percentages of capacity use, an assumption is made that the maximum monthly flow per
customer for Edmonds is ten per cent higher than that for Mountlake, by reason of the
past history of the sewer system of the old town area of Edmonds, which was constructed
and operated for many years as a combined storm and sanitary sewer. Although extensive
storm water separation programs have been consummated during recent years, flows in
this portion of the Edmonds system still are effected strongly by storm conditions.
3. Calculations of Percentages of Capacity Use
a. Ratios of numbers of customers served:
(3)
Appendix D, continued.
No. of Per Cent
Agency Customers of Total
Mountlake 6940 42.06
Edmonds 9562 57.94
Total 16,502 100.00
b. Assumed Ratios of Monthly Maximum Flows
Assume Mountlake monthly maximum flow equals the number of Mountlake
customers multiplied by the factor "G". Edmonds monthly maximum flow then will
equal the number of Edmonds customers multiplied by the factor "I.IOG". The total
flow thus equals '
(6)-940) (G) + (9.562) (1.I0G) = 17,458G
Edmonds ratio of flow then equals
10;5.18G/17,458G = 0.6025-
and Mountlakes ratio of flow equals
1.0000 - 0.6025 = 0.3975
c. Edmonds Percentage of Capacity Use
PE = (0.75) (0.6025)+ (0.25) (0.5794) = 59.67%
d. Mountlake Percentage of Capacity Use
PM = 100% - 59.67% = 40.33%
UNITS 12A and 12E
I. Criteria
Percentages of capacity use are to be equivalent to ratios of monthly
maximum flows.
2. Special Provisions
Monthly maximum flows through Edmonds Outfall Sewer (Units 12A and 12E)
cannot be determined prior to completion of the 1971 treatment plant expansion
project (Unit 12D), for the reason that the present capacity of the plant influent
channel and master meter is insufficient to accommodate winter -time peak flows. An
interim determination of ratios of monthly maximum flows therefore must be predicated
upon weighted ratios of numbers of customers served.
3. Calculation of Percentages of Capacity Use
The calculations for interim determination of percentages of capacity use
for Units 12A and 12E are as heretofore set forth in subparagraphs 3a and 3b of the
immediately preceding section of Appendix D relating to Units 12, 1213, 12C and 12D.
From the said calculations the percentages of capacity use for Units 12A and 12E
are as follows:
Percentage of
Agency Capacity Use
Mountlake 39.75
Edmonds 60.25
(4)
e
.1
0
t`
W
m
W
U
W
0
LL
0
cf5
Q
LLI
CO
cn
u.1
U
Q
of
W
3
W
O
F-
Z
0
LL-
(D
U)
F-
Z
m
W
cif
Lli
O
cry
LLJ
0
F-
O
U
Z
Q
O
W
CD
Q
W
U
Q
L.L
0
Z
0
F-
Q
J
m
Q
F-
J
(L
J
W
J
C_) LSO
O O
O
O O
O
O
T1 co r-- 0 00
cO
M cO - O O lO
c0
N
N
-
cn
1,O M
O\
00 r
U-1
rn O o0 cor-
lD
r N 00110 � -
CIA
�o
CD
0O
M
r
ON-
a�
01% IslNrO
�jO
� N O
co
ul
n
N
�O
N N
\,O
- -
CV
O\
�o
W .b
-
N
- F-
I Z
N Q
- J
c�O
NO
r-
00
�,O
Nr—rMLn
MO't CD 00
-
r-
W
000r--
nNr-
n
MOM;i-r—
O\
M-N N N -
M
K)
00
-
Qf
LC1 M
D`
-
Ill
L(1
M N - 0 -
co
N 0 ill
Ct
M
00
Q
Y
v5
W
Z
LU
�2:
000
000
O
Ln\,Ol-- 1 I
CO
MHO- O 10
cO
d
F-
0
0 M
a1
co r--
Ufl
M CO CO I I
O
rl- N O �,O I-
ul
�.o
O
F-
M
r-
co N-
C\
O\ Ill N I 1
0
N 0 1
O
-
- Q
D
-
- 3
U
o
Z Z
0
2:
to
ko N
co
1r -
co
cO
N I` N I I
\,O
H M co I O
C
M
m
m col
r--
Ln N
r-
LC
O 1 1
M M
r-
Nl - N N I--
m
�
Lu
Of
Ill MOl
't -
n
L(1
MN- I I
cO
N Ln I
I;*-
O
�
.0
-
-
N
-
3
Q
Y
Z
LO
Of
cr�
W
�2:
O O
O
O O
O
O
ul0 1 1 I
t
MHO--
0
co M
Ol
00 r—
Lcl
't
M CO I I I
I N
r- N O I I I
O
OA
ON
-
m
CTLn I I I
Ln
d N I I I
- Q
Lo
-
N
cO
-
-
M
O
3
J
-
�
U
- cn
Z O
� Z
O
mac!)
�O N
co
r-
ON
1,O
Nr I I I
Or)
HMO 1 1 1
ill
r
O
0
W
O1 Or-
LnNr
Ill
M O I I I
M
M-N 11 I
r`
-
r—
W
or_
Ill rn
Ol
-
11
Ill
to N I I I
In
N \�o I 1 I
,30
0-\
•
U
-
-
N
-
rn
W
Q
Z
-
cn
Q
0-1
W2:
O O
O
O I
O
O
Ill 0 1 1 1-
M I I I E I
M
D\ U
O
110 M
O\
co t
0
r
M CO I I I
N
� I I I 1 1�
m
0
ct�
F-
M
r--
co 1
co
co
Ol Ill I I I
Ill
I I I I 1
m
�
d5 0
u5
-
-
cO
-
-
W
:D
co
U
df
U)
F-
- F-
Z cn
0
co
�O N
O
r I
r—
n
N r I 1 I
a,
't I I I I I
It
M
O
W
W
m 00
I`
U') I
n
M
M O 1 1 1
M
M I 1 1 1 1
M
r
0
��
Ln M
ON
d I
M N 1 1 t
o
N I I I I I
N
r
N
:D
U
-
-
N
M
1L
Q
3
co
W
iY
co
W
I O
O
1 I
1
0
n cO I I 1-
M I I I t I
M
't
Y
O
I M
M
I I
I
M
M CO 1
I
1 I
I
O\ Lcl I I I
I I I 1 I
CT
N
Q=D
t
F-
U
F-
- Of
LU
:D CC-D
Z
-
O
I N
N
I I
I
N
N r- t I 1
O\
M
n
1 0
co
I I
1
00
M O I I I
M
M I I I I 1
M
r-
n
Jo-
I MM
I I
I
M
M N I I I
n
N I I I I I
N
r-
-
U
-
m
Q
3
W
Y
0
Q
U)
_
J
J
>-
4
F-
U
Z
J
F-
W
0
:D
>-
IL
O
-
O
F-
-
v
t6
W
F-
+
U
+-
J
+-
'6
Y
O
W
O
J
O
0
O
J
0
Q
?-
Q
Q
F—
co
-0
co
-0
F-
U
J
J
7
O
0
7
0
3
O
(if
Z
F--N
O
F- -Ncn
F-
Z-NM,:I-LnV)
Z -NM "ZtLC) Mcn
F-
(D
W
Z I I
Z I I
0 1 1 1 1 1
0 1 1 1 1 1 1
C>
Z:�E:
OIror-,
2:w W W W W
2:00000of
O
0
Cl
0
s
LU
Lu
0
r
N
N
N
O
r
rn
tz
w
co
w
U
W
0
LL
O
U)
Q
w
cn
r
W
CD
Q
W
3
W
Z
0
LL
O
G)
F-
Z
m
0
ui
W
Lo
U)
of
LLJ
cn
U
LL
0
to
O
F-
Q
LY
Z
Q
Of
LLJ
00
Z
LL.
O
Z
0
F-
2
J
C3
Q
F--
J
F- J
N —
M
Q �
M
�D
r Ln ;:I- Ln ON
O
r lO k.D N '� O
Ln
't
. J
Z Q
'T LD
O
rrl D
O
O
�O Ln r CO Ln
IZI-
O— r't N—
Ln
C\
O
J Q
LLJ
0LL-
UO
ON
--M
N
LnM—LONO
NOr�O OOr
r
O
Z F-
F-
N
N
—
—
't
— —
Ln
O
— =D
O
—
O
W LL-
LLJ
VZ O
N df
I
U)
N Z
LL Of
— Q
O W
0 0
0
0 0
0
O
Ln �O Ir 0 CO
lD
M %,D — O O LD
\,O
(,.j
N
Cf)IZ
• 0
110MO'\
OrLn
1�
MCC) CC) 00rLO
rN 00l0 4—C'\
�o
O
F-
O F-
MITr
O(N—
O)
a>L1NrOt0
N0
00
T)
Ln
—
Z cn
—
N
\,D
N N
tiD
— —
N
ON
1,D
—
=D F-
U
Z
F-J
r—O
OMM
—
\DLnr
co
00N M mot—
D1
J
Z Q
LIIrN
NMLn
00
00;zj- I I
Ln
ONO— I —LO
—
O
U 0
M
I0 N
00
of
00 Ln N I I
Ln
-T O_ O\ I O
I l
N
CD
O
>
O
-
- Q
W LL
— 3
W O
— 0
v)
Z Z
LL of
O
0 w
7
O 0
0
0 0
0
O
Ln LO r I I
ao
M O 1 10
LO
p
p
\.D Pr)
ON
00 F--Ln
't
N-)COCO I I
0
r N 00 �0 I—
Ln
\,D
o
w
OF-
Mir
00N—
(),\
all LnN 1 I
c
N O I
C
Z cn
—
N
l0
— —
—
3
U
Y
F- J
r O
r
Ln 't
m
l0
M M
ID
N n —
ao
Z
Z Q
LnNr
MLD(ON
r
—r I I I
\,DNLn I I I
M
N
O
cr-IU
O
NO
r
(D�Ln
ON 1 1 1
r
I—
F-
d
—
N
lD
—
—
—
M
O
tz
—
r
W LL
0 Q
a- O
Ln
Ln
— p
LL tY
Z Z
O LU
ZO
2:
000
000
O
Ln
Mk0 — I 1 1
O
—
—
:
O
�JO K)
G%
CO r
Ln
�
M 00 1 I I
N
r N 00 I I I
co
CD
;I-
0
O F-
N-) 't
h
00 N—
m
01\ Ln 1 I 1
Ln
N I I V
r
Z co
�t
—
N
�O
—
—
—
N')
CDW
W
U
z
J
M LD
CO
O
O
0\
O'\ LD
lfl
�O
l0
QZ
Q
M m
N
r I
r
m
rr I I I
T)
't I I I I I�
O
O
2:
LLJU
W
O
O:I-
Ln
• I
— I
k0
• I I I
O �10 I I I
r
• I I I I I
Ln I I I I I
Ln
M
O
m U
F-
L11
In
N
r
—
N
O
Of
of
—
df O
W LL
LL.
IL p
a0
Fes- .LLB
— F-
Z cn
O LJ
:-5,
O O
O
O I
O
O
Z
• 0
�10 M
0)
00 1
00
r
M cO I I I
N
r I 1 I I I
h
ON
�D
IL
O F-
M'T
r
00 1
co
l0
cy\ Ln I I I
Ln
� I ! 1 I I
'mot
D1
�
IL
U
W
Z Q
I
I I
I
r
Ln I f I
r
Ln 1 1 1 1 1
Ln
N
O
cn
W F-
O
I
I r�
I !
I I
I
I
r
I I I
oJN I I 1
N
. 1 I I I I
� I I I 1 I
O\
YU
tIn
O
p
Z
of
—
=)
W LL
r 01-
CL 0
F-
- ct�
ui
Z LLJ
LL W
BCD
Z
O W
:l2i:
1 00
1 I
1
O
1 1 1—
M I I I I I
M
zttt
—
O
1 M
M
I I
I
M
M 00 1 1 1
'N
r 1 I I 1 I
r
O'
N
O F-
1
I I
I
M Ln I I I
:n
J
Z N
—
N
Q
:D
In
U
3
w
LL..I
p
Q
>
cn
J
J
0
Q
>
<
F-
U
Z
J
LLI
F-
Z
Z
—
O
Q
Q
U
—
�
—
O
H
—
—
O
O
..
..
J
W
F-
od
+
U
4
+--
v
OZ
Y
+-
Y
4-
Q
f-
4-
Q
U
Q
-0
<
co
U)
I—
Q
J
D
J
p
0
0
0
Of
W
F--Ncn
♦--Nco
F-
Z — NM KtulLO
Z —NM 3- LnMv)
F-
CD
(.D
Z I I
Z I 1
O 1 1 1 1 1
0 1 1 1 1 1 1
Q
Z��
�LILLJ W W W
�0000 0of
O
O
0
0
�
2:
LLJ
LLJ
9/7/71
APPENDIX F
REAPPORTIONMENT OF CAPITAL COSTS BY UNITS
OF JOINT SEWERAGE SYSTEM
UNIT
DESCRIPTION
CAPITAL
COST
USAGE
EDMONDS
RATIOS
MOUNTLAKE
COST APPORTIONMENT
EDMONDS MOUNTLAKE
7A
Ballinger Truck
$ 150,854
0.750
0.250
$113,140
$ 37,714
8
Lake Ballinger Pumping Sta.
93,900
0.209
0.791-
19,625
74,275
9
Force Main to Highway 99
38,000
0.209
0.791
7,942
30,058
10
Edmonds Way Trunk (SE)
85,200
0.3224
0.6776
27,468
57,732
II
Edmonds Way Trunk (NW)
107,985
0.4019
0.5981
43,399
64,586
12
Edmonds Original Tr. Plant
135,000
0.5967
0.4033
80,554
54,446
12A
Edmonds Outfall Sewer
60,360
0.6025
0.3975
36,367
23,993
12B
1959 Tr. Plant Expansion
57,340
0.5967
0.4033
34,215
23,125
12C
1967 Tr. Plant Expansion
214,500
0.5967
0.4033
127,992
86,508
Subtotals
$ 943,139
$490, 702
$452, 437
12D
1971 Tr. Plant Expansion
389,500*
0.5967
0.4033
232,415
157,08.5
12E
1971 Outfall Extension
32,500*
0.6025
0.3975
19,581
12,919
TOTALS
$1 , 365, 139*
$742, 698
$622, 441
*Estimated (with allowance for anticipated State and Federal grants)
12/22/70
APPENDIX G
SUMMARY OF CAPITAL COST PAYMENTS BY EDMONDS
FOR USE OF UNITS 8 & 9
Calendar
Annual Payments as
Year
Cost Reimbursement
1962
$ 666.64
1963
2,000.00
1964
2,000.00
1965
2,000.00
1966
2,000.00
1967
2,000.00
1968
2,000.00
1969
2,000.00
1970
2,000.00
TOTALS
$16,666.64
9/7/71
APPENDIX H
SUMMARY OF CAPITAL COST PAYMENTS BY MO.UNTLAKE
FOR USE OF UNITS 12, 12A & 12B
Yea r
1962
1963
1964
1965
1966
1967
1968
1969
1970
TOTALS
(1)Including Ronald
Mountlake
Flow-MG(I)
192.689
304.980
306.020
357.430
424.9 20
431.180
438.824
553.958
598.873
510.581
511.9956
4,631.451
Total Annual Capital
Cost Reimbursement
$ 2,890
4,575
4,590
5,361
6,375
6,473
6,582
8,309
8,983
7,659
7,680
$69 ,477
9/7/71
O
r
Ln
LLI
Z M
J �
In �
F- LLI
cn U
O LLI
U p
J O
Q F--
F-
a- LLI
H U v~i
X LJ Un
J
p m LLI
Z Q CD
LLJ 0- � �
0- ZD LLI
Q m 3
LLI
Cn
LLr
(if F-
Z
LL
O O
Z
OL- _
O
F-
Q c1�
Z F-
� Z
0-1 O
LLI
F--
J
LLJ J
p Q
(Y
O
LL
LLr ..
Ln
N
o
r`
O
o
0
- F-
O
O\
N
O
N
CV
Z
Ln
M
(T
O
O
O
O
O
m:D^
- O
N
O
N
r`
N
N
Z 7-
M
-
-
-
p .1
M
N
O
M
Ln
Ln
Ln
-
O
O
co
O
00
co
n
O^
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
{- :Dz
.
— O
m
O
r-
r`
r-
r-
Z �
OD
Ln
Ln
Lfl
rn
-
-
-
U
M
r`
O
O
N
O
Ln
N
O
M
co
kp
LC)
-
d"
Ln
O
O
(T
— F-
O
O
O
zt
O\
^
Z
Ln
Ln
—
F- O
\
Ln
—
O
- O
�Zt
o
\.D
rr
-
o
-
z
-
co
-
� �
N
c0
M
m
oo
M
co
Ln
N
O
M
Ln
Ln
�O
Ln
t0
O �
co
O
O
N
\
—
N
M
O
—
O
ON
O
�t
kO
r`
-0
r-
O
rrl
O
-
-
M
-
-
Z �
Ln
N
-
Q .-.
If1
tT
O
M
�
�+
N
(Dr�
M I
Lfl
�O
Ln
00
r�
N
N
N1
M
r-
O
l0
l0
(X3
C)
O
I
CD-
-
rn
Z 0
N
M
N
O
rfl
l0
M
OA
Ln
�r
-
O
O
-4-Ln
M
O
't
co
I-
Z
O
St
\
00
Ln
Ln
O\
Lfl
O
�'
F-
^
co
^
- O
Ln
O
�
N
-
M
N
l0
10
O
Z
M
Ln
\
—
N
t`
M
—
N
Ln
00
IQO
OT
M
N
M
F-
co
ON
CC)
TN
Ln
F-
�
Ln
\
N
�
N
M
00
O
Z O
r-
p�
CDD
O
-
M
Ln
N
-
O cn
O N
Cp
C\
N
O O O ID-
p
O N
-,0
Ln M O
Ln
N O Izi- 00
Z
N tr)
\ Lfl Ln
N
r N �t
F- O
O
r�
- -
4
- -
Z p
O
N
\ -
-
::I-
LLI
�.O
O'\ -
6 (n
O (T
r-
N
V)
O
M
00 p
O O
O
Lp M O
M
O
M
Z
01\ N
Ln
\ M Ln
M
1
m l0 O
N
Lo O
^
^
N
^
w
w
F-
- O
r
\ 0b
lc
-
- p
M
N
-
M -
N
Z LLJ
ZD
Q
O
N
M
00
M
r- F-
Ln
Ln
-
r %
O
co
-
Z
00
N
r-
\
M
Ln
-
ON
r-
-
O
F- =
-
- O
O
O
r-
\
CO
4
N
r
Z
Ln
rn
-
Ln
M
-
O
r`
\
Ull
cn
at;
O
M
M
(0
-
N
O
±\
F
N
Un
N
E
+-
N
ttnn
(o
E
O
E
N
N
(n(n
(o
O
LL-
C
IL
Un
UD L
U
U
O
—
N
c
L
L Z
C
UJ
-
F-
c
--
(D -0
N O
~
L
(ll
L
C
j
L
E
C •�
z
a
a
a
O
Ctf
(n (o
a
(Z
_0
U
L
U
O
01
O
L CO
(o
Q
Q
(D
UD
(ll
Q)
F-
Q
a) L-
�
+
D
4-
+-
4-
L
D O
-
4-
+-
L-
�
C
4-
+-
O
L- •-
E Un
0
(n
(n
U
LL
W
Ln
L
'-O
OU
UCop
Q
U
a-
Q
�
9/7/71
APPENDIX J
SUMMARY OF REIMBURSABLE CAPITAL COST BALANCES ON DECEMBER 31, 1970
FOR ALL UNITS OF JOINT SEWERAGE SYSTEM
REIMBURSABLE
CAPITAL COST BALANCES
UNIT
NO. DESCRIPTION EDMONDS MOUNTLAKE
7A
(Ballinger Trunk Sewer)
--
--
8, 9
(Ballinger Lift Station 8 Force Main)
$21,233
--
10
(E. Edmonds Way Trunk Sewer)
41,480
--
II
(W. Edmonds Way Trunk Sewer)
--
$15,014
12, 12B
(Edmonds Original Plant + 1960 Exp.)
-
58 349
12A
(Edmonds OutfaII - 1960)
--
18,629
12C
(Edmonds Plant Expansion - 1967)
--
1.01,950
12D
(Edmonds Plant Expansion - 1971)
--
157,085
12E
(Edmonds Outfall Extension - 1971)
--
12,920
TOTALS
$62.713
$ 36_—� 3 , 947
NET BALANCE OF
CAPITAL COSTS*
OWED BY MOUNTLAKE TO EDMONDS
$ 301_,234
*Including Accrued Interest
9/7/71
APPENDIX K
DETERMINATION OF ANNUAL PAYMENT BY MOUNTLAKE
FOR CAPITAL COST REIMBURSEMENT TO EDMONDS
A. Calculation of Effective Interest Rate on
Net Capital Cost Balance Owed by Mountlake
Reimbursable
Effective
Interest
Capital Cost
Interest
Weight
Unit
Balance
Rate (%)
Factor
(1) Owed by Mountlake
Unit 7A
$ -0-
4.50
$ -0-
Units 11, 12A, 12B
51,548
4.25
2,191
Unit 12
38,446
3.50
1,415
Unit 12C
101,950
5.10
5,199
Units 12D, 12E
170,005
7.00
11,900
Subtotal
$363,947
5.69
$20,705
( (2) Owed by Edmonds
Units 8, 9, 10
62,713
4.50
2,822
(3) Net Balance Owed by Mountlake
$301,234
5.94
$17,883
B. Calculation of Mountlake's Annual Payments for Capital Cost Reimbursement
(1) Capital Recovery Factor (for 20-year term and
5.94 per cent effective interest rate) = 0.08684
(2) Required Annual Capital Reimbursement Payment:
P = (0.08684)($301,234) _ $26,159