Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
2019-05-07 City Council - Full Agenda-2338
o Agenda Edmonds City Council snl. ,nyo COUNCIL CHAMBERS 250 5TH AVE NORTH, EDMONDS, WA 98020 MAY 7, 2019, 7:00 PM 1. CALL TO ORDER/FLAG SALUTE 2. ROLL CALL 3. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA 4. APPROVAL OF THE CONSENT AGENDA 1. Approval of Council Special Meeting Minutes of April 23, 2019 2. Approval of Council Meeting Minutes of April 23, 2019 3. Approval of claim, payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire payments. 4. Acknowledgment of Claim for Damages 5. Confirmation of Salary Commission Appointments 6. Confirm Appointment of Candidate for a Board and Commission 7. Shoreline Master Program Periodic Review Ordinance 8. Council Housing Commission Resolution 5. PRESENTATIONS 1. Planning Board Quarterly Report (15 min) 6. AUDIENCE COMMENTS (3-MINUTE LIMIT PER PERSON) - REGARDING MATTERS NOT LISTED ON THE AGENDA AS CLOSED RECORD REVIEW OR AS PUBLIC HEARINGS 7. ACTION ITEMS 1. Non -Represented Compensation Study (30 min) 2. Gateway sign recommendation (15 min) 3. Final Subdivision Approval for Jenkins Lane Plat at 720 13th Way (10 min) 8. STUDY ITEMS 1. Development Activities Update (15 min) 2. Fund Balance / Reserve Policy Discussion (20 min) 9. MAYOR'S COMMENTS 10. COUNCIL COMMENTS 11. CONVENE IN EXECUTIVE SESSION REGARDING PENDING OR POTENTIAL LITIGATION PER RCW 42.30.110(1)(1). 12. RECONVENE IN OPEN SESSION. POTENTIAL ACTION AS A RESULT OF MEETING IN EXECUTIVE SESSION. Edmonds City Council Agenda May 7, 2019 Page 1 ADJOURN Edmonds City Council Agenda May 7, 2019 Page 2 4.1 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 05/7/2019 Approval of Council Special Meeting Minutes of April 23, 2019 Staff Lead: Scott Passey Department: City Clerk's Office Preparer: Scott Passey Background/History N/A Staff Recommendation Review and approve the draft meeting minutes on the Consent Agenda. Narrative N/A Attachments: 04-23-2019 Draft Council Special Meeting Minutes Packet Pg. 3 4.1.a EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING DRAFT MINUTES APRIL 23, 2019 Elected Officials Present Staff Present Diane Buckshnis, Councilmember none Mike Nelson, Councilmember Adrienne Fraley-Monillas, Council President Dave Teitzel, Councilmember Tom Mesaros, Councilmember Mike Nelson, Councilmember (arrived 6:55 p.m.) Kristiana Johnson, Councilmember Neil Tibbott, Councilmember Dave Earling, Mayor Elected Officials Absent none 1. CALL TO ORDER/CONVENE IN JURY MEETING ROOM At 6:45 p.m., the City Council Special Meeting was called to order by Mayor Earling in the Council Chambers, 250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds. 2. CANDIDATE INTERVIEWS FOR APPOINTMENT TO A CITY BOARD OR COMMISSION The Council then convened in the Jury Meeting Room to interview Ray Liaw, a candidate for appointment to the Public Facilities District (PFD) Board. At 6:59 p.m., the meeting was adjourned. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes April 23, 2019 Page 1 Packet Pg. 4 4.2 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 05/7/2019 Approval of Council Meeting Minutes of April 23, 2019 Staff Lead: Scott Passey Department: City Clerk's Office Preparer: Scott Passey Background/History N/A Staff Recommendation Review and approve the draft meeting minutes on the Consent Agenda. Narrative N/A Attachments: 04-23-2019 Draft Council Meeting Minutes Packet Pg. 5 4.2.a EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL DRAFT MINUTES April 23, 2019 ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT Dave Earling, Mayor Adrienne Fraley-Monillas, Council President Michael Nelson, Councilmember Kristiana Johnson, Councilmember Thomas Mesaros, Councilmember Diane Buckshnis, Councilmember Dave Teitzel, Councilmember Neil Tibbott, Councilmember 1. CALL TO ORDER/FLAG SALUTE STAFF PRESENT Al Compaan, Police Chief Don Anderson, Assistant Police Chief Linda Coburn, Municipal Court Judge (by phone) Phil Williams, Public Works Director Patrick Doherty, Econ. Dev & Comm. Serv. Dir. Shane Hope, Development Services Director Scott James, Finance Director Mary Ann Hardie, HR Director Dave Turley, Assistant Finance Director Kernen Lien, Environmental Program Mgr. Frances Chapin, Arts & Culture Program Mgr. Maureen Judge, Council Legislative/Admin. Asst. Jeff Taraday, City Attorney Scott Passey, City Clerk Jerrie Bevington, Camera Operator Jeannie Dines, Recorder The Edmonds City Council meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Mayor Earling in the Council Chambers, 250 5t1i Avenue North, Edmonds. The meeting was opened with the flag salute. 2. ROLL CALL City Clerk Scott Passey called the roll. All elected officials were present. 3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL TO REMOVE STUDY ITEM 9.1, FUND BALANCE / RESERVE POLICY DISCUSSION. Councilmember Buckshnis explained Finance Director Scott James indicated not all the documents had uploaded correctly. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. COUNCIL PRESIDENT FRALEY-MONILLAS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO APPROVE THE AGENDA IN CONTENT AND ORDER AS AMENDED. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 4. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes April 23, 2019 Page 1 Packet Pg. 6 4.2.a COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. The agenda items approved are as follows: 1. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES OF APRIL 16, 2019 2. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF APRIL 16, 2019 3. APPROVAL OF CLAIM, PAYROLL AND BENEFIT CHECKS, DIRECT DEPOSIT AND WIRE PAYMENTS 4 PFD BOARD CANDIDATE CITY COUNCIL APPOINTMENT 5. PRESENTATIONS 1. BETTY LOU GAENG PROCLAMATION Mayor Earling read a proclamation thanking Betty Lou Gaeng for her community involvement, historical writings and research, and encouraging all residents to join him in extending our gratitude and sincere appreciation to her for her years of service. Ms. Gaeng thanked the City for the proclamation. She was sorry to leave Edmonds but was moving to Alaska to live with her son and grandchildren. Mayor Earling presented Ms. Gaeng with a small gift. 2. ARTS COMMISSION ANNUAL REPORT 2018 Arts & Cultural Program Manager Frances Chapin introduced Edmonds Arts Commission Chair Tanya Sharp. Chair Sharp explained the seven volunteer Arts Commissioners work with the Cultural Services Division on various projects, volunteering hundreds of hours each year. The Arts Commission works in partnership with many different arts organizations and funding partners who help make their programs possible. The Arts Commission was established by City Council 43 years ago to recognize the important role of visual, performing and literary arts in enhancing the quality of life in our community. Chair Sharp reviewed: • Mission: o Ensure that the arts are an integral part of the: ■ Central identity, ■ Quality of life, and ■ Economic vitality of Edmonds. • Cultural Planning & Implementation 2014 — 2018 o Key Strategy — assessment of cultural tourism and economic impact of arts and culture in Edmonds. o Economic Impact of Arts & Culture Study ■ Economic Impact = about $50 million, and 440 full-time job equivalents and $17 million in labor income generated by Arts & Culture in the City of Edmonds. o Creative District ■ Application for new State Creative District certification ■ Edmonds designated the first certified Creative District in State of Washington December 2018 Core Programs o Literary ■ 33 years of Write on the Sound writers' conference ■ Sold out - 275 attendees ■ Lodging revenue - overnight stays Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes April 23, 2019 Page 2 Packet Pg. 7 4.2.a o Literary/Visual ■ 21 years of the Best Book I Ever Read Poster Contest for third graders o Performing Arts ■ Music at the Library - 7 free music presentations in the Plaza Room, fall — spring ■ Concerts in the Parks Series - 19 free summer concerts at City Park and Hazel Miller Plaza o Visual Arts ■ Rotating exhibits in the library and the Frances Anderson Center ■ Youth Display Case for local high school students ■ On the fence temporary art installations Art in the Public Realm o City Art Collection — acquisition and maintenance ■ Over 150 original artworks located throughout City buildings ■ More than 35 permanently sited outdoor installations ■ 25 small sculptural artworks on new flower basket poles Economic Vitality/Cultural Tourism o Provide workshop resources to support artists and arts and culture organizations o Recommended $21,000 from Lodging Tax funds to community arts and culture organizations for advertising events which attract visitors Thank you partners, sponsors and volunteers o Over 1000 volunteer hours contributed for EAC o Partners and Sponsors include: ■ Edmonds Center for the Arts; Edmonds Library; Friends of the Edmonds Library; Edmonds Historical Museum; Wintergrass; EPIC Group Writers; Edmonds School District; Hazel Miller Foundation; Hubbard Foundation; Edmonds Arts Festival Foundation; Lynnwood Honda; Acura of Lynnwood; Edmonds Bookshop; Edmonds Theater; Harbor Square Best Western; Walnut Street Coffee; Windermere Real Estate Edmonds; Patricia Thorpe & Heather Krause/RBC Wealth Management Councilmember Johnson asked about the EAC's plans for the future. Ms. Chapin commented with the Creative District, there is a lot going on. There are ongoing public art projects and temporary art projects and they hope to do other larger projects. She advised of a new online public art walking tour map available on the Edmonds Arts Commission website of the City's collection of public art and other artwork that is visible in the public realm. Councilmember Buckshnis commented the first Creative Art District meeting included a lot of powerful people. She noted many people enjoy the Concerts in the Park and the concerts at Hazel Miller Plaza. Councilmember Tibbott commented he was in awe of the number of volunteer hours, noting those hours and activities help make visitors feel welcome and part of the community. He asked about the historical plaques in front of some buildings. Ms. Chapin answered the Stages of History plaques at 12 sites in downtown are part of the City's art collection and are considered one art installation. The plaques were installed in 2015 with matching funds from the Preserve American Program. The plaques recognize the community's heritage and each one is different and artist made. Ms. Chapin thanked all volunteers, especially the seven Art Commissioners and the Student Representative. She identified Commissioners Rhoda Soikowski and Patricia Oneill in the audience. 6. REPORTS ON OUTSIDE BOARD AND COMMITTEE MEETINGS Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes April 23, 2019 Page 3 Packet Pg. 8 4.2.a Councilmember Mesaros reported the SeaShore Transportation Forum meeting included discussion regarding King County Metro services updates to meet the demand; King County Metro is the fastest growing public transportation in the country. An update was also provided by Community Transit regarding the addition of a Swift Line from Bothell to north Paine Field that will reduce the commute time by about 30 minutes compared to regular public transportation and also takes cars off the road. Councilmember Mesaros explained the Snohomish County 911 Board discussed policies related to the purchase of the new emergency radio system that voters approved in November. The Board is comprised of half elected officials and half professionals working in police and fire. Due to the dedication of that group, when people dial 911, they get the best service. The legislature rated Snohomish County 911 as best 911 service in the state. Councilmember Mesaros reported the Edmonds Public Facilities District Board will meet on Thursday and their agenda includes routine financial information. Prior to tonight's meeting the Council interviewed the PFD Board's recommended candidate, Ray Liaw, and her appointment was approved on the Consent Agenda. He advised of the Edmonds Center for the Arts (ECA) Center Stage event on May 1 where the ECA introduces their upcoming season and auction sponsorships, an event that typically raises over $200,000. If anyone wants to attend, he invited them to contact the ECA. Councilmember Nelson reported the Lodging Tax Advisory Committee's retreat included an update on the Creative District and review of the current budget; lodging revenues are strong and Best Western indicated they have strong bookings through rest of the year. The committee also discussed a multi -year approach to lodging tax funds to potentially fund larger opportunities in the future. Councilmember Teitzel reported he and Councilmember Buckshnis serve on the Disability Board which administer benefits for the Law Enforcement Officers and Fire Firefighters (LEOFF), a group of 26 firefighters and police officers who retired decades ago for whom the City covers any medically necessary expenses not covered by insurance. There are currently two members in long term care and a third just entered long term care. The Board reviewed the medical data for this individual and agreed the care was necessary. Councilmember Teitzel reported on the quarterly meeting of the Lake Ballinger Watershed Forum. On March 14t'', there was an accidental sewer valve closure by a King County maintenance worker that resulted in a 250,000 gallon sewage spill that covered the yards of approximately 10 ten homes on the south end of the lake requiring a massive cleanup. Procedures have been implemented to ensure that does not occur in the future and remedial training has been conducted. The Forum also discussed plans to use an environmentally friendly chemical, Procellor, to control milfoil. Machine harvesting was tried but did not work because it caused the milfoil to break and sprouts new plants. The meeting also included a report that Sound Transit 3 will include the removal of approximately 5,000 trees, many of them in the Lake Ballinger Watershed; 20,000 trees will be replanted, a net benefit for the environment over time. Councilmember Teitzel reported on the Port of Edmonds Commission meeting; the Port is beautifying the intersection of SR104 & Dayton to match the Cascadia Museum side. The breakwater lighting was damaged by a storm this winter and had to be totally replaced. Freedom Boat Club recently opened in the Port; they are targeting younger boaters and hope to have ten members for each of their four boats. The boardwalk on the north side of the marsh is owned and maintained by the City but there has never been an easement; the easement has been written and engaged in by both the City and the Port. Council President Fraley-Monillas reported Snohomish County Tomorrow reviewed housing and development 2040-2050. The Diversity Commission retreat included discussion of goals for the coming year. She met with Verdant and had three Snohomish Health District meeting including an awards Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes April 23, 2019 Page 4 Packet Pg. 9 4.2.a ceremony last Saturday where the public health award was given to the Edmonds School District for their kitchens. A Joint Snohomish County Tomorrow & South County Cities including discussion on the need for housing for the future. Councilmember Tibbott reported the Alliance for Housing Affordability did not meet. He referred to the Economic Development Commission's (EDC) recent report to the City Council, commenting the EDC reviews economic data for the entire City including revenues by businesses. The EDC's meetings include updates from each of the members including the Port, Chamber, Planning Board, and the School District. One of the opportunities the EDC is considering is a joint advertising effort to make advertising dollars go further. He summarized the EDC serves an important purpose and have their eye on economic activities, sources of revenue and new opportunities. Councilmember Buckshnis reported the Creative District's first meeting included review of the five year strategic program which is available on the City's website. WRIA 8's grant funding committee is meeting for three days beginning next Monday to do walkabouts of 19 projects; the total ask is $5 million. Windward, the Council's appointed consultant studying the Marsh, has completed their third task which will be presented to the Council soon. The Earth Day ivy pull at City Park was well attended and very successful. Councilmember Johnson thanked the alternates who attended during her absence: Council President Fraley- Monillas who attended Snohomish County Tomorrow, Councilmember Teitzel who attended the Historic Preservation Commission and Councilmember Buckshnis for overseeing the Windward consultant contract. 7. AUDIENCE COMMENTS Ardis Santwire, Edmonds, a resident of Maplevine Condominiums, was concerned about the legally nonconforming condominium issue. The City code did not take into consideration older buildings that were built before the current code. The code needs to be amended so people living in the 20+ buildings can sell their homes and buyers can get financing. Barbara Pruitt, Edmonds, a resident of Maplevine Condominiums, was concerned about the legally nonconforming condominium issue. She questioned why these issues were not investigated before the new code was adopted, noting buildings constructed in the 1960s and 1970s may not conform with new building codes. She was hopeful the Council would recommend to the Planning Board grandfathering these older buildings, many of which are owned by seniors and is their sole source of money when they need to sell and move into assisted living. Tom Sullivan, Edmonds, a real estate broker, said his client at Maplevine Condominiums expected to close escrow next week until he told her that was no longer possible. His client, a 72-year old widow living on a fixed income and for whom the condominium is her sole asset, needs the money now. If she is not able to sell, she will experience negative consequences and the buyer, the broker and everyone involved will be upset. He estimated there were 260 units affected by this and it is the Council's job to fix it quickly. Samm Jaenicke, Edmonds, applauded the Council for forming the Housing Commission, a valuable step in ensuring diverse voices are heard. However, even though selecting members who are not members of other boards or commission was stated as a strong preference, it appears not to have been included in the resolution as a requirement. She requested when making selections for the commission, Councilmembers and the Mayor apply that standard, and select members who have not participated in other boards or commissions for the past two years. That would go a long way toward having a commission comprised of truly open minded individuals who do not bring biases into this work. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes April 23, 2019 Page 5 Packet Pg. 10 Marge Plecki, Edmonds, referred to the nonconforming condominium issue, explaining she has a condominium on the market and learned last week it is on the list of nonconforming buildings. She urged the Council to move forward tonight with at least a temporary solution to this problem and a permanent solution in the coming weeks. She expressed appreciation to several Councilmembers who reached out to her following her inquiry. She expressed support for this issue proceeding as a single item and not packaged with other amendments. Margie Clark, Edmonds, an owner of one of the legally nonconforming condominiums, urged the City Council to grandfather the nonconforming buildings as soon as possible. She read a letter from a neighbor Robert and Luann Ogeltree, residents of a 4t' floor condominium in Edmonds, who were informed it was not in compliance with the City's height limit although it was compliant when it was built. They invested hundreds of thousands to purchase and upgrade the unit, actions that were not opposed by the Council or Planning Board at the time they occurred. Now it appears they would potentially be prevented from selling or rebuilding should the need arise due to the change in height limits. This could be viewed as taking their investment without compensation and since nothing has changed legally since their purchase and the City, State, School District, etc. have assessed their property at much too high a value in the interim period. Taking their property without just compensation or any wrongdoing on their part is or should be illegal. They urged the City Council and Planning Board to adopt grandfathering language covering all similar buildings in the City. The alternative would be a protracted legal proceeding at great cost to the City and owners. Rebecca Anderson, Edmonds, referred to Action Item 3, Land Use Permit Decision Making and Quasi - Judicial Process and thanked the Council for taking time to carefully review this matter which speaks to their dedication and effort to carefully discern this important issue rather than hastily taking a vote to remove or retain this function. She opined that removing this function would bear undue burden on citizens; forcing residents to go outside the city limit to resolve an issue instead of having elected city government officials participating in the process. Liability continues to be main the reason this issue is being considered for removal. The logic is that by eliminating the quasi-judicial process from the Council, the risk to the City will be greatly reduced. It was her understanding this issue had been adopted and removed several times by the Council over the years. She encouraged the Council to consider the following before taking action, a) will removing Council from the process benefit residents of Edmonds today or in the future, b) will it make it easier for residents to resolve disagreements or issues or make it more complicated and costly, and c) will it keep the Council directly involved in all things Edmonds or give outside influence in the community? Abdicating this vital function will place a barrier between the Council and citizens who voted to place them in office and result in entities outside of Edmonds making important decisions for Edmonds instead of local elected government. Perhaps it is time to stop the game and figure out why quasi-judicial became such a hot potato in the first place and get to the root cause of the controversy instead of removing a Council function that best serves the residents of Edmonds. Michelle Dotsch, Edmonds, thanked the Council for passing the resolution establishing the new housing commission. However, in reviewing the resolution, an important part was left out. As the Council debated the creation of the commission including how to make it truly citizen driven, the practice of how City commissions, task forces, and boards are selected came up. Various groups include the Alliance for Citizens of Edmonds (ACE), a citizen group of about 29 residents, a grassroots citizens group of over 55 residents wrote and spoke to the Council recommending the Council include in the resolution that no residents be chosen who currently serve on any other board, commission or committee or have served in the last two years. She quoted Councilmember Tibbott, the liaison for the Economic Development Commission, who reported to the EDC last month that the Council voted to form a housing commission which will look at varieties of housing and a visioning process the next 10-20 years; no one on current boards/commissions will be eligible for an appointment to the housing commission. She requested the Council amend the resolution forming the housing commission to show they truly desire average residents to be included in Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes April 23, 2019 Page 6 Packet Pg. 11 the commission. Citizens are watching and listening for the Council to do the right thing this time, discard the old ways and be advocates for residents, the true stakeholders who elected the Council and ask to have their best interests at heart. Joan Longstaff, Edmonds, having had a real estate company in Edmonds for nearly 40 years and sold many condos, was horrified these residents would be unable to sell and buyers would be unable to get financing. She urged the Council to take the necessary action to prevent that from happening. Wendy Kondo, Edmonds, said what is needed most right now for the many people that have condominiums for sale is for the City to write a rebuild letter, a letter from the Planning Department that says the building can be rebuilt to the existing density. That is what started this issue and is what the bank she is working on the sale of a condo wants. With that letter, the condo sale can close; however, the Planning Department has said they cannot write that letter. Gary Nelson, Edmonds, spoke regarding the quasi-judicial issue, complimenting staff for the great overview in the packet. He explained with a vote tonight, the Council could overturn a Hearing Examiner or Architectural Design Board decision which the Council can do today. If the Council does not overturn that decision, residents are back to where they are today where the applicant or a citizen group has to go to Superior Court. It appears the Council is making a decision when it first comes to City Council so the Council might as well be making the final determination. 8. ACTION ITEMS TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT CONTRACT -COURT ADMINISTRATOR Municipal Court Judge Linda Coburn (participating by phone) explained the current Court Administrator Sharon Whittaker has accepted a position as the Everett Municipal Court Administrator which requires hiring a new court administrator and temporarily filling the position until a new court administrator is hired. The court administrator is an essential position for the court; the person basically runs the daily operations of the court and because Edmonds is a small court, existing staff cannot absorb that workload. Janet Vandiver is experienced and capable, temporarily held this position previously for former Court Administrator Joan Ferebee, and is available to start work May 1, Ms. Whittaker's last day. This is a temporary employment contract which requires Council approval. COUNCIL PRESIDENT FRALEY-MONILLAS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER MESAROS, APPROVE THE PROPOSED TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT CONTRACT FOR JANET VANDIVER. Council President Fraley-Monillas said she has discussed this position with Judge Coburn and agreed the position was warranted. She encouraged the Council to support Judge Coburn's request for a temporary employee until the position can be filled on a permanent basis. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 2. OPTION FOR ADDRESSING NONCONFORMANCE IN LIMITED MANNER Development Services Director Shane Hope reviewed: • Multifamily nonconforming Issue o Before the 1980s, multifamily buildings were allowed by zoning code to have more density and height than now Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes April 23, 2019 Page 7 Packet Pg. 12 4.2.a o Edmonds' nonconformance code does not currently allow multifamily buildings to be "grandfathered" to previously allowed density & other dimensions —except in commercial zones o So far, 633 units on 25 sites in town are known to be affected. ■ If they needed to be rebuilt, due to major damage (75% of replacement cost), they could be in limbo ■ Banks are beginning to turn down financing of these units... Map of Sites Identified So Far 0 633 units on 25 sites o Not comprehensive o More affected units maybe out there Parallel Tracks, based on April 16t' City Council discussion Interim Ordinance Longer Term Ordinance • Short-term (180 days) • Goes to Planning Board • No public hearing required o Intro — April 24 • Could be adopted by City Council as o Public hearing (with 2 week advance notice) emergency ordinance (immediate effect) May 8 and recommendation o SEPA documentation • Goes to City Council o Discussed April 16 and 23 o Public hearing with 2 week advance notice May 14 or 21 and possible adoption Some possible longer -term ordinance issues for multi -family nonconforming o Address "grandfathering" only for the number of units? o Also address building dimensions and setbacks? o Need longer than one year after major damage to apply for permit (with complete building plans)? o Should reference be added to building code? Ordinance guided by Comprehensive Plan o Required by state law to implement and to be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan o Comprehensive Plan includes a goal about retaining and preserving housing where possible and policy about reexamining the codes to see what can be done to retain existing housing stock. o Would be discussed at Planning Board Recommendation: o Decide whether to aim for public hearing on longer term ordinance to be May 14? o NOTE: Min. 14-day advance public notice is required Councilmember Mesaros encouraged Council President Fraley-Monillas to schedule a public hearing on May 14 so the issue can be resolved as soon as possible in a permanent manner to assure residents the investment they've made is truly a good investment. Councilmember Buckshnis spoke in favor of grandfathering, pointing out if a building were destroyed, it would be difficult to determine which unit did not get rebuilt. Common sense says the existing dimensions, height, etc. need to be respected. She supported adopting the interim ordinance, relaying in speaking with Mr. Lien, the language was taken from a previous ordinance. She assured Edmonds was not the only city where this issue arose; it was an anomaly found by an astute banker. Councilmember Tibbott agreed with Councilmember Buckshnis' comments. He asked what specifically changed in the last month that precipitated this issue. Ms. Hope answered the City received a call from a realtor whose client was in her 70's, had planned to sell her unit, had arranged a sale and made plans to Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes April 23, 2019 Page 8 Packet Pg. 13 4.2.a move into assisted living, and the bank refused to finance. Staff also learned there were other buildings that had a similar issue. Councilmember Tibbott asked if the banks had changed their way of evaluating buildings. Ms. Hope agreed there was a general trend of banks getting tighter in the last several years which increased the likelihood that they would notice this issue. Councilmember Tibbott referred to Ms. Kondo's comment about a letter from the Planning Department allowing the condo to be rebuilt and asked whether the interim ordinance would allow that letter to be provided. Ms. Hope said the interim ordinance would allow the City to issue a letter to the bank because it would state under the existing code, it would be allowed to be rebuilt. Councilmember Teitzel was concerned about the problem that had been created for citizens, noting in some cases, the ability to sell their condominium was their lifeblood, thus the need for the City to move quickly to resolve this issue. He asked whether the interim ordinance would apply to apartments buildings, duplexes, triplexes, fourplexes, etc. Ms. Hope said it applies to multifamily; there are a number of apartment and condominium buildings. She did not believe it would apply to duplexes but buildings with more units. Councilmember Teitzel was uneasy the full universe regarding the number of units was not well understood. He was hopeful that as work on a permanent ordinance continued, that could be identified. He supported the interim ordinance due to the need to move forward quickly on a temporary basis. COUNCIL PRESIDENT FRALEY-MONILLAS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL, TO ADOPT THE INTERIM ORDINANCE. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Ms. Hope asked about scheduling a public hearing on May 14. Council President Fraley-Monillas said she will research having a hearing prior to committee meetings. 3. LAND USE PERMIT DECISION -MAKING AND OUASI-JUDICIAL PROCESS Environmental Program Manager Kernen Lien reviewed: • Tonight looking for consensus on Council role: o Quasi-judicial appeal, or o Council as appellant • Regardless of decision on Council quasi-judicial role, move forward with other previously presented related code amendments o Type IV -A (Final Formal Plats and PRDs) o ECDC 17.00.030 — Public Agency Variances o ECDC 20.100.040 — Review of Approved Permits o ECDC 20.06 (Open Record Public Hearings) and ECDC 20.07 (Closed Record Public Hearings) o Development Agreements COUNCILMEMBER JOHNSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT FRALEY- MONILLAS TO REMOVE THE TOPIC FROM THE TABLE. MOTION CARRIED (6-1) COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL VOTING NO. Councilmember Johnson distributed a proposed amendment to 20.01.003.A Permit Type and Decision Framework. She expressed concern with the cost of outside counsel and staff resources following the quasi- judicial review of two major projects, the Burnstead subdivision near Hickman Park and Building 10 at Pt. Edwards. The Council discussed the quasi-judicial process at the Council retreat three years ago; this is an opportunity to consider all the public comments and give direction to staff. She proposed moving three decisions (design review, preliminary formal plat and preliminary planned residential development) from Type IIIB which includes Council review, to Type IIIA which does not include Council review. This would Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes April 23, 2019 Page 9 Packet Pg. 14 accomplish what she initially sought, to get the Council out of the protracted quasi-judicial hearing process, noting the Council's review of those two matters occurred prior to four Councilmembers being on Council. Mr. Lien displayed the table in ECDC 20.01.003.A. explaining generally Type IIIA decisions are not appealable to City Council and Type IIIB decisions are appealable to City Council. With regard to Building 10 and the Burnstead development, design review or a public hearing by the Architectural Design Board (ADB) is required. If that section were moved, it would apply to larger commercial developments as well. Generally projects that required ADB review also trigger SEPA, multifamily developments of five or more units or commercial developments with 4,000 square feet of commercial area and 20 new parking spaces. The Burnstead development was a preliminary formal plat and a planned residential development. If the Council only did not want to hear quasi-judicial on those type of projects, the simple fix would be to move them from Type IIIB column to the Type IIIA column and they would not be appealable to City Council which is basically Councilmember Johnson's proposed amendment. Councilmember Johnson asked City Attorney Jeff Taraday if that could legally be done. Mr. Taraday said there is no legal prohibition on creating different processes for different types of applications. If the Council wanted to retain its quasi-judicial role for a certain subset of applications and not have a quasi-judicial role for another subset, it was free to do that. Councilmember Mesaros asked if this was an action item. Mr. Lien said the action staff is seeking is direction whether the Council wants to remain in quasi-judicial and whether to bring back the other amendments. Councilmember Mesaros referred to public comment that there is less cost to appeal to the City Council compared to Superior Court and asked Mr. Lien what the fee was to appeal to City Council. Mr. Lien answered an appeal of a Type IIIB decision to City Council is $500; the filing fee for a judicial appeal to Superior Court is $240. The cost is in regard to legal representation; appeals to Superior Court may be more likely to have legal representation although appeals to City Council often have legal representation. For example, both the Burnstead and Building 10 appeals had legal representation for all parties involved. Councilmember Mesaros asked how many items that have come to the City Council for quasi-judicial review were then appealed to Superior Court, thereby adding a step for citizens rather than making it simpler. Mr. Lien said there have been four appeals to City Council in the last ten years (Burnstead Plat, Hillman critical area variance, Pt. Edwards Building 10, and the Willowdale Fence), two went on to Superior Court. There were two closed record appeals on the Burnstead development, one in 2007 that went to the appellant court and was remanded back to the Council. The second closed record appeal in 2012 was not appealed further. Building 10 was appealed to Superior Court; prior to a decision being issued in Superior Court, a settlement agreement was reached. Councilmember Mesaros said his concern was related to cost and the fact that if an appellant does not like the Council's decision, they have expended a considerable amount of money and then have to spend more to appeal to Superior Court. This is an opportunity for the City Council to be advocates for constituents which is not allowed under the current quasi-judicial process. During a quasi-judicial review, the Council cannot talk to constituents and can only review the record created by the hearing examiner. He referred to Councilmember Johnson's proposal, noting it may reduce the number of City Council quasi-judicial reviews thereby creating less bureaucracy for citizens. Mr. Lien said the packet included a comparison prepared by the City Attorney of the Council in the quasi-judicial role versus the other role. Councilmember Buckshnis said in the nine years she and Council President Fraley-Monillas have been on Council there have been eight quasi-judicial reviews where the Council either affirms or disagrees with the hearing examiner's decision and in most cases have affirmed the hearing examiner's decision. Mr. Lien displayed the chart in 20.01.003.A, advising in addition to appeals, the Council also makes quasi-judicial Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes April 23, 2019 Page 10 Packet Pg. 15 4.2.a decisions such as formal plats, final formal plats, final planned residential development (PRD), site specific rezones, and public agency variances such as high school. He summarized there have been other quasi- judicial decisions that have come to the City Council, but only four Type IIIB quasi-judicial appeals. Councilmember Buckshnis said citizens have a right to speak to their Councilmembers rather than go to Superior Court. The change was made in 2010 and it has remained for 9 years. The problem she envisioned with the Council advocating was the possibility of a 4-3 Council vote. For example if she was on the minority side, City employees would be advocating for the majority and she anticipated this could become a political hot potato when the minority did not want staff to advocate for a citizen in Superior Court. Councilmember Buckshnis asked if respected Councilmember Johnson's proposal only addressed multifamily. Mr. Lien said if the highlighted decisions were moved, design review by the ADB would apply to design reviews that trigger SEPA which is multifamily of 5+ units or commercial of 4,000+ square feet. Councilmember Buckshnis referred to the quasi-judicial review related to locating a house in a critical area. Mr. Lien explained that was the Hillman Variance; critical area variances are now in the Type IIIA column. When the critical area code was updated a few years ago, based on the resolution that the Council wanted to get out of quasi-judicial review, those no longer come to City Council. Councilmember Buckshnis supported having the Council in a quasi-judicial role because she believed citizens have a right to appeal to City Council. Council President Fraley-Monillas supported retaining the City Council in a quasi-judicial role. If Councilmember Johnson's proposal is approved, individual homeowners could still appeal to City Council. Mr. Lien explained if the amendments proposed by Councilmember Johnson were approved, essential public facilities, conditional use permits which require a public hearing by the hearing examiner, zoning variances, height and setback variances and home occupation permits where a public hearing is required by the hearing examiner, would remain in the Type IIIB column. Council President Fraley-Monillas asked for examples of essential public facilities. Mr. Taraday answered it is anything that is difficult to site such as jail, a train station, garbage dump, or other public facilities that are essential to society that are generally difficult to site. State law required cities adopt processes for siting essential public facilities. Councilmember Tibbott said he has thought a lot about whether the Council should remain in the quasi- judicial process. He was not confident sending an appeal to Superior Court would serve their best interest. Due to ambiguities in the code, it serves citizens well for the City Council to hear appeals. He was in favor of the Council maintaining its quasi-judicial role. However, he appreciated Councilmember Johnson's amendment because it eliminated a couple of the topics he was most reluctant to review, partially because of what he witnessed as a Planning Board member when the Burnstead development and Building 10 came to the City Council. He was in favor of the amendments proposed by Councilmember Johnson and requested additional language in the code to help buttress the way reviews come to the City Council. Often the Council is surprised by them or not well informed in advance so there is the potential for Councilmember to hear additional information about a site outside the record. He suggested there be a better process for bringing information to the City Council and Planning Board. Councilmember Tibbott relayed his discussion with Mr. Taraday about a recent Council quasi-judicial review. In the beginning he had no conflict of interest, but as the process unfolded, he realized he had more information about the topic than was introduced. He suggested training for the Council that allows an executive session or ability to voice concern about continuing as an impartial member of the review panel. Mr. Taraday had assured him that could be part of the quasi-judicial process. Councilmember Tibbott said if WCIA is concerned about the Council's exposure to liabilities, it may be helpful for WCIA to provide Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes April 23, 2019 Page 11 Packet Pg. 16 4.2.a training regarding how quasi-judicial reviews are conducted. He summarized he was in favor of retaining the Council in a quasi-judicial role and supported the amendment proposed by Councilmember Johnson. Councilmember Teitzel found the decision matrix very helpful. There has been a great deal of discussion about the cost to a citizen under the current quasi-judicial process to bring an issue to Council versus the new process. It was his understanding the cost to bring an appeal to the City Council was $500. Under the new process where a citizen brings an issue to Council and states their belief that an error has been made and Council agrees to advocate for the citizen, there is no cost to the citizen. Mr. Lien agreed. Councilmember Nelson expressed support for the Council's role in quasi-judicial reviews. It is a way for citizens to have an accessible form of quasi judiciary. It may be imperfect but it works and allows citizens to come to City Council. In practice, the Council rarely exercises the role. It is a small price to pay for that accessibility. Mr. Lien summarized a majority of the City Council wants to stay in the quasi-judicial role. Staff will prepare an ordinance, taking into consideration Councilmember Tibbott's comments. He asked for confirmation that the Council supported Councilmember Johnson's proposed amendment, remaining in a quasi-judicial role but moving the highlighted permit types into the Type IIIA column. A majority of the Council supported Councilmember Johnson's proposed amendment. Mr. Lien advised that change would be included in the ordinance. Mayor Earling declared a brief recess. Discussion about adding an agenda item regarding rring the Citizen's Housing Commission Council President Fraley-Monillas referred to comments during Audience Comments regarding the Housing Commission. COUNCIL PRESIDENT FRALEY-MONILLAS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO ADD TO THE HOUSING COMMISSION RESOLUTION THAT APPLICANTS MUST NOT CURRENTLY BE SERVING ON BOARDS OR COMMISSIONS OR HAVE SERVED ON BOARDS OR COMMISSIONS OVER THE PAST TWO YEARS. City Attorney Jeff Taraday said as this was a regular meeting, items could be added to the agenda via a vote of the Council. If the intent is to amend a resolution that has already been adopted, that requires another resolution. Council President Fraley-Monillas asked why the resolution could not simply be amended. Mr. Taraday advised the resolution could be amended via another resolution. If the Council's intent is to vote on a resolution not currently before the Council and have it signed by the Mayor without coming back to the Council, that intent should be clear in the motion as that is not the normal process. Councilmember Johnson raised a point of order and suggested putting this on a future agenda due to procedural issues. Council President Fraley-Monillas suggested the Council adopt a new resolution, adding that no citizen currently serving on a board or commission or serving on a board or commission for the last two years for review at the next Council meeting. Mayor Earling spoke in favor of the point of order made by Councilmember Johnson. Mr. Taraday explained as the Council President, Council President Fraley-Monillas could schedule a new resolution on the next agenda without a vote of the Council. Council President Fraley-Monillas said the amendment does not change the intent of the resolution establishing the housing commission. Mr. Taraday Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes April 23, 2019 Page 12 Packet Pg. 17 4.2.a relayed his understand that Council President Fraley-Monillas was directing him to bring back a resolution for the next Council meeting making that amendment. Council President Fraley-Monillas said she did not want to delay the process. She asked if the application process could proceed assuming that additional language. Development Services Director Hope advised staff is ready to seek applications. The current language states preference will be given to those who are not on a City -appointed board or commission; it does not say anything about other organizations that may already be taking positions on housing issues. She suggested slightly modifying that by indicating the Council intends to reexamine that issue and may exclude citizens serving on a board or commission or who have served on a board or commission in the last two years. Council President Fraley-Monillas asked if it was reasonable to inform applicants that a pending amendment could affect certain people's qualifications. Mr. Taraday said it would be okay to inform applicants of that. He suggested ascertaining if there was majority support for that concept by Council. Ms. Hope advised information on the website would be updated as new information arises. Councilmember Johnson reiterated her point of order point of order, expressing concern with just having a head -nod to make a decision this important. She requested it be added to the agenda or to direct the City Attorney to bring it back in two weeks. Councilmember Buckshnis agreed with Councilmember Johnson's point of order. She supported proceeding with the application process with the preference language and Councilmembers could review applications with that in mind. Council President Fraley-Monillas asked if a vote of the Council was required. Mr. Taraday answered as the maker of motion, if it was Council President Fraley-Monillas' desire that staff notify applicants that they may ultimately be disqualified by a future Council action, a vote tonight on that future Council action would be helpful. Otherwise there is no point in providing that notice to applicants. If the Council is content to accept applications and not say anything to the applicants and take action at the next meeting, no vote is necessary as the Council President can put the item on the next Council agenda. His understanding is the Council President has the authority to set the agenda prior to a meeting. Once the Council meeting starts, the agenda is controlled by the Council, not the Council President and adding an agenda item requires a vote of the Council. COUNCILMEMBER NELSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT FRALEY- MONILLAS, TO ADD THIS TO THE AGENDA AS ITEM 8.4. Councilmember Teitzel said as drafted, the resolution did not ignore or disrespect citizen input, it was intended to create flexibility. For example, there was a representative from ACE on Ms. Hope's task force; if the amendment to the resolution is not worded carefully, that person, who has some very good, very definite, valuable thoughts about the housing process could potentially be precluded from serving on the new housing commission. He summarized the wording of resolution provided flexibility and the ability for Councilmembers to use their judgment in allowing citizens to participate. Councilmember Buckshnis agreed with Councilmember Teitzel that there is a difference between a board and a commission and a mayor -selected committee. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 4. RESOLUTION FORMING CITIZENS' HOUSING COMMISSION Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes April 23, 2019 Page 13 Packet Pg. 18 COUNCIL PRESIDENT FRALEY-MONILLAS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER NELSON, TO CREATE A NEW RESOLUTION AS THE OLD RESOLUTION STATES WITH THE EXCEPTION OF ADDING ANYBODY CURRENTLY ON A CODIFIED BOARD OR COMMISSION OR HAS BEEN ON A CODIFIED BOARD OR COMMISSION IN THE LAST TWO YEARS SHALL NOT BE PERMITTED TO SERVE. MOTION CARRIED (6-1), COUNCILMEMBER JOHNSON VOTING NO. Councilmember Johnson commented there are many members of boards and commissions with experience with housing such as the Planning Board who has dealt with this issue in many ways. For that reason, she opposed the amendment. Mr. Taraday summarized the revised resolution will be on the May 7, 2019 Consent Agenda. 9. STUDY ITEMS 1. FUND BALANCE / RESERVE POLICY DISCUSSION This item was removed from the agenda via action taken under Agenda Item 3. 2. PRELIMINARY DECEMBER 2018 QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT Finance Director Scott James 2018 financial highlights o Overall City-wide Financial Performance Results Include: ■ Revenues finished $2.9 million ahead of last year ■ Expenses finished $706,000 lower than last year ■ Debt was reduced by $2.507 million ■ Capital expenses totaled $13.1 million ■ Investment income totaled $917,754, an increase $264,000 o General Fund Financial Performance Results Include: ■ Revenues finished $2 million ahead of last year ■ Sales tax revenues increase by $1 million ■ Development related revenues decreased $426,000 ■ Expenditures finished the year at 91 % of Budget ■ Ending Fund Balance increased $707,886 o Comparison of General Fund Changes in Fund Balance ■ General Fund ending fund balance: $10.. . o Sales Tax by Source (12 months ended December 31, 2018) 2018 Total $8,406,296 Retail Automotive $1,770,393 Manufacturing $102,598 Gasoline $35,957 Eating & Drinking $1,021,386 Health & Personal Care $235,903 Others $155,487 Construction Trade $1,80,883 Clothing & Accessories $244,814 Amusement & Recreation $87,647 Misc Retail $1,168,815 Wholesale Trade $309,738 Communications $241,468 Accommodations $47,962 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes April 23, 2019 Page 14 Packet Pg. 19 4.2.a Business Services $690,265 Retail Food Stores $297,098 Automotive Repair $191,884 Change in Sales Tax Revenue December 31, 2018 compared to December 2017 2018 Total $1,011,182 Retail Automotive $51,189 Manufacturing $8,400 Gasoline $70 Eating & Drinking $78,474 Health & Personal Care $7,604 Others $107,528 Construction Trade $503,310 Clothing & Accessories $16,200 Amusement & Recreation $1,974 Misc Retail $213,661 Wholesale Trade ($9,360) Communications 414,763 Accommodations $531 Business Services $80,985 Retail Food Stores $25,876 Automotive Repair $12,356 • Comparison of top five sales tax cate ories 2013-2018 Source 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Construction Trade $724,302 $835,645 $1,348,832 1,060,245 $1,397,738 $1,804,883 Retail Automotive $1,256,641 $1,522,374 1,630,09 $1,769,983 $1,819,035 $1,770,393 Misc Retail $677,361 $741,537 $813,560 $858,108 $955,035 $1,168,815 Eating and Drinking Similar to Misc. Retail $1,021,386 Business Services 1 $425,615 1 $430,383 1 $458,071 1 $499,728 1 $609,233 $690,265 • Investment Annual Interest Income o Investment Committee comprised of Mayor Earling, Assistant Finance Director Dave Turley and Finance Director Scott James o Investment income expected to increase in 2019 2014 12015 12016 12017 12018 $163,214 1 $335,926 1 $423,816 1 $653,690 1 $917,754 • Real Estate Excise Tax Comparison 2014 12015 12016 12017 12018 $1,879,861 1 $2,699,178 1 $2,589,551 1 $2,983,643 1 $3,583,153 • Recovery on Track to Break Record (Source: NEBR) o Average Recessions Lasted Approximately 14 Months o Average Recovery Lasted Approximately 75 Months o We are now in our 119' Month of Recovery 0 39 Days and Counting to Break 120t1i Month Record • City Fleet Environmental Improvements o Between October 2012 and January 2013, fifteen police vehicles and one street vehicle converted to propane o Now have a total of 36 propane and 10 hybrid vehicles out of a fleet of 118 Autogas Savings Report (through November 30, 2018) Fuel Savings Last 3 Months $13,193 Fuel Savings Last 12 Months $48,503 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes April 23, 2019 Page 15 Packet Pg. 20 4.2.a Total Savings to Date 1 $255,681 Summary Cost Savings Analysis Gasoline Average Price Last 3 Months $4.39 Auto as Average Price Last 3 Months $1.71 Average Savings Per Gallon Last 3 Months $1.49 Autogas Gallons Used Last 3 Months 9,849 Fuel Savings Last 3 Months $13,193 44% Total Fuel Savings to Date $255,681 51% Environmental Savings Analysis (to date) CO2 Emission Reduction Overall (in pounds) 453,812 Gasoline Gallons Displaced Overall 151,885 • Graph of Outstanding Governmental Debt (2019-2030) o Current outstanding debt: $5.5M o Will be retired in 2030 • Graph of Outstanding Utility Debt (2019-2039) o Current outstanding debt: $42M o Will be retired in 2039 Councilmember Buckshnis commended staff on the investment income. She liked the new slides regarding the five top revenues. She commented on the great recession in the late 2000s in which Lehman Brothers closed, Goldman's became a bank, Chase absorbed Washington Mutual, etc., a total mess. With regard to being in the 119' month of recovery, she anticipated months of recovery because the president continues to deregulate and past recessions have just been normal blips. Mr. James commented in December 2018 for the first time there was an inversion in the yield curve for treasuries, where short term rates paid higher than 10 year treasury bonds. That has been a signal in the past of a precursor to a recession, but it could be anywhere from 9 to 19 months later. He agreed the economy was still strong and the City is showing good financial results this year. Councilmember Buckshnis anticipated there would be some market adjustments but she believed the economy would still be good for a couple years. Councilmember Teitzel agreed it was a rosy picture, but that makes him uneasy because it will not stay rosy. There also can be disagreements about how long it will take for the cycle to go south; everyone knows it will as the economy runs in cycles. He wanted to be prepared to avoid headcount reductions, lack of street maintenance, etc. He referred to the sales tax by source pie chart, noting approximately 1/3 of the City's sales tax comes from retail auto sales and eating and drinking establishments, sources he considered volatile during a down economy as people stop buying cars and/or going out to eat. During the next economic downturn, 1/3 of the City's revenue could be at risk. He recommended being conservative and planning for that, acknowledging it was difficult to say exactly when it would happen but it was coming. Councilmember Johnson commented the presentation highlights some of the great things in the City. She thanked the fleet manager for all the conversions and fuel efficiencies and the investment committee for their investments which have paid off. With regard to debt, she expressed interest in learning more about utility debt and plans to reduce it over time and be self -funded, what the $5M was being spent on and how it could be spent in the future such as undergrounding utilities. She acknowledged the City still has roads, sewers, etc. to build and suggested this be discussed with the Finance Committee. Councilmember Tibbott especially liked the year to year charts showing changes and top five categories of sales tax. He suggested that information be provided to the EDC. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes April 23, 2019 Page 16 Packet Pg. 21 4.2.a 3. DISCUSSION OF NON -REPRESENTED STAFF SALARY INCREASES Council President Fraley-Monillas explained their research found Non -Represented staff are paid within the median of salary; some comparator cities pay above and some pay below. With the assistance of Council Legislative/Admin. Assistant Maureen Judge, Council President Fraley-Monillas reviewed: • Background o At the December 11, 2018 Committee Meeting of Personnel and Public Safety, the HR department introduced a Non -Represented Compensation Study with the Mayor's recommendation to increase Edmonds Director's salary band and increases for two Assistant Police Chiefs and three employees with pay disparities, and give the Police Chief a $4500 one- time contribution to deferred compensation. In addition, provide a one-time, $500 per non - represented employee contribution to a health retirement account (HRA-VEBA). • Optics o Mayor Earling's recommendation to increase Edmonds Director's, Police Chief and Assistant Police Chief s salary band —for the highest paid earners in the city— negatively effects morale of all of the city employees, in particular those at the top step of their salary band. This issue is not being addressed for the rest of the city employees o Fairness ■ 50 Rank and File Represented Employees: - Have not had a cost of living adjustment (COLA) since 2017; - They are paying more for health insurance in 2019 and are not beneficiaries of the VEBA one-time payment; - Many believe they are not being heard by this administration. o Parity ■ COLA Increases to director -level positions result in significant raises: - When you are an Administrative Assistant making approximately $50k per year, a 3% COLA amounts to $1,500 per year. - When you area Director and you make $159,700, a 3% COLA equals $4,791 per year. o Totals ■ The Mayor's total requested increase of approximately 8% for Directors and Assistant Police Chiefs equals a low of approximately: - $12,080 each per year to a high of $13,036 each per year - Totaling approximately: $115,851 for (9) employees The Council's comparator cities for Edmonds are o Within <10k> of Edmonds population of 41,820 o Within the greater four -county Metro area o Reminder: salaries should reflect the median, not the high or low end of each range Positions for salary benchmark comparators o Public Works Director o Finance Director o Human Resources Director o Parks & Recreation Director o Development Services Director o Community Services/Economic Development Director o Assistant Police Chiefs Tables for each position comparing salaries in other cities/counties, Mayor's proposal, cost and notes Council President Fraley-Monillas apologized to the Director she used last week as an example in her presentation; it was not meant to be directed specifically toward one Director. She continued her presentation: Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes April 23, 2019 Page 17 Packet Pg. 22 Finally: Results of the study: o Net result of the salary research: current city salaries for the six Director positions, Police Chief, and two Assistant Police Chiefs are well within comparator -city range. ■ They currently reflect the MEDIAN o Mayor proposed increases are not aimed at employee retention The Mayor's proposed increases are excessive at a time when Edmonds citizens are reportedly being taxed out of their homes or are on the edge of losing their homes due to increased taxes in all sources. The median income for Edmonds households: $82,697 (Source: American Community Survey, 2017) Definitions: o According to Patrick Doherty who was asked what the average income for an Edmonds citizen: "That would come from the American Community Survey (subset of the US Census). BUT they don't show the "average" (btw, they use the word "mean") individual income. They do have the mean household income, estimated in 2017 for 2016 earnings, which is $112,186, or mean family income which is $137,537. The only thing close to what you're specifically asking for (what "people" make), I guess, would be the "median earnings for workers" BUT that's not a good figure to use for any comparison of other figures that is based on "averages" or "means" because "medians" are MUCH lower. For example, the median household income is $82,697, while the mean is $112,186. The mean is the typical mathematical average — each individual income number totaled up and divided by the total number of incomes. The median is just the midpoint numerically in the range from the highest income to the lowest income. It doesn't represent what the average person makes." For context - State and County agency executive salaries for 2018-2019 are included to highlight positions with greater responsibility and scope of influence, as example: o Governor Jay Inslee: $177,107 ■ Employees: 64,039 o WA State Treasurer: $144,679 o WA State Commissioner of Public Lands: $138,225 o Snohomish County Executive Dave Somers: $183,939 o Employees: Over 2,500 o Snohomish County Treasurer: $136,356 o Snohomish County Sheriff Ty Trenary: $168,021 Council action on April 2nd: o Increased salaries for the three employees with pay disparities outlined in the Non -Represented Compensation Study. o The Directors, Assistant Police Chiefs, among the 44 non -represented employees receiving a one-time $500 contribution to HRA-VEBA accounts and a 3% COLA. Recommendation o No salary increases for Directors, Police Chief, or Assistant Police Chiefs at this time based on research on public employees. o Re-evaluate Directors, Police Chief, and Assistant Police Chiefs salaries and benefits in the next three-year review cycle for potential increases in 2022. Council President Fraley-Monillas said one issue that is not addressed that she would be willing to address if necessary would be the benefit packages which vary by city and count toward additional compensation such as extra time off, city -owned vehicles, clothing allowance, etc. which they did not have an opportunity to research. Two more comparator cities were added to their analysis. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes April 23, 2019 Page 18 Packet Pg. 23 4.2.a Councilmember Teitzel asked why the comparator cities were not the same as those used by HR Director Mary Ann Hardie in her analysis, in some cases they are different and the salary ranges differ. Council President Fraley-Monillas said they did not use every comparator city due to the time that would require. Councilmember Teitzel observed Ms. Hardie used eight comparator cities; Council President Fraley- Monillas used a different number. Council President Fraley-Monillas said they added the 3% COLA to the total compensation which may not have been added to Ms. Hardie's analysis. She did not receive Ms. Hardie's report until about 11 am today. The general rule of thumb is they believe the Directors are paid within the median. Councilmember Buckshnis apologized to the Public Works Director for being singled out during last week's presentation. She and Council President Fraley-Monillas have worked in the public sector and knew raises were not given, let alone 5% raises. Rather than a 5% increase, she suggested hiring a consultant to review the bands. Council President Fraley-Monillas said there needs to be a policy regarding what happens when employees reach the top step because there are a large number of City employees at the top step of their scale as well. When she worked in government, employees got promoted or changed jobs when they reached the top band. Councilmember Buckshnis reiterated it may be necessary to have an outside consultant conduct an independent review. Councilmember Johnson recalled that was last done in 2012. Councilmember Buckshnis recalled in 2012 Councilmember Johnson and then-Councilmember Bloom reviewed all the job descriptions. Council President Fraley-Monillas said it is common in government to work in a salary range/band and generally the only increase at the top of the band is a COLA which the Directors and Police have all received. For Councilmember Mesaros, Council President Fraley-Monillas assured in her years of public service and working for government, the bands were never changed. Councilmember Mesaros asked for clarification; if someone was working in an administrative role 38 years ago and their salary range was $10,000 - $25,000, the salary range was the same 38 years later. Council President Fraley-Monillas said the only time there was an increase in the band was when a particular job category was reviewed; she recalled that was done once every ten years. Councilmember Mesaros said he would like to see some facts around that because that statistic of 38 years with no change in the band seemed unrealistic. Council President Fraley-Monillas corrected him that it was 33 years and she did not say there was no change, just no changes that she remembered. She recalled there were changes made to job classes but not jobs as a whole, those were addressed via COLAs. Councilmember Mesaros said the current policy states the bands will be considered and adjustments made based on comparator cities. Human Resources is charged with that task and presenting information to the Council which the Council had an opportunity to review last week. The Council should be following that policy. Council President Fraley-Monillas said it is up to Council's purview. Councilmember Mesaros observed although Council President Fraley-Monillas was recommending the Assistant Police Chiefs (ACOP) not receive an increase, there is one Officer and three Sergeants who make more than the ACOPs in straight salary. Given there are opportunities they have to serve in different cities in the area, that is a disparity in salaries for the senior employees in leadership. Council President Fraley-Monillas said that is a factor for all employees. Councilmember Mesaros summarized those providing significant leadership should not be penalized. Council President Fraley-Monillas relayed their research found the ACOPs were paid within the median and most departments only had one ACOP, not two. Councilmember Mesaros asked which cities comprised "most." Council President Fraley-Monillas referred to the listed comparator cities, Lake Stevens, Lacey, Burien, Puyallup, Lynnwood, and Bothell, and said only Bothell and Edmonds have two ACOPs. She noted there were a number of no matches in the comparator cities. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes April 23, 2019 Page 19 Packet Pg. 24 4.2.a Council President Fraley-Monillas said their response today was primarily regarding parity and fairness versus specifically whether they should be paid one range up or down. Citizens are concerns about their own salaries and the fact that an average citizen's salary is $87,000/year. Councilmember Johnson raised a point of order, stating according to Roberts Rules of Order, it was not appropriate to have a one-on-one discussion between Councilmembers. Mayor Earling ruled Councilmember Mesaros could proceed. Councilmember Johnson requested Mr. Taraday research and Mayor Earling proceed to the next Councilmember. Mayor Earling reiterated Councilmember Mesaros would be allowed to continue. Councilmember Mesaros said what is missing is an overall view of salaries and suggested a fuller salary study needed to be done in the future. The current policy states a review of the bands using comparator cities and information presented by the Human Resources Department. The Council needs to follow the policy by looking at the data from the Human Resources who has provided that data in the past. To have a secondary set of data presented along with a lot of editorial comment is not a good way to review information. He summarized this was moving in the wrong direction. With regard to several Directors being at the top of their range, Councilmember Teitzel said the current policy under annual salary adjustment states, "Each employee will maintain the same step within the newly approved salary range that they held prior to the adjustment." He asked what that statement meant to Council President Fraley-Monillas relative to Directors that are currently at the top step within that range. Council President Fraley-Monillas said she did not have an answer. Councilmember Teitzel interpreted that to mean if a Director was at the top of their range and a new salary range was approved, that Director would move to the top of the range in the new salary band. Council President Fraley-Monillas agreed. Councilmember Buckshnis observed the Council previously did not have a Legislative Assistant. Having one now allows the Council to do due diligence to check financial information which is appropriate because the Council controls budget. Council President Fraley-Monillas agreed which is the reason she began this process. Councilmember Buckshnis said she was not happy there was a placeholder in the budget without a full Council vetting. Human Resources Director Mary Ann Hardie explained her presentation was follow-up to help clarify the Mayor's recommendation for the Directors, Chief of Police and Assistant Chief positions from the 2018 Non -Represented Compensation Study. 5.5 NR Employees (Compensation Policy) o City Policy approved by Council in 2012. Created to help ensure equity and to maintain competitive salaries and benefits in order to attract and retain high quality staff and an effective work force and to maintain salaries that are internally equitable, in proper relationship to all other jobs within the City, within reasonable budget parameters. o Study of 45 employee positions (almost all exempt and salaried employees) Includes paraprofessional, professional and managerial and director positions. o Study analysis completed by HR staff every three (3) years as required by Council approved policy. o Based on the study results and policy language, the Mayor brings forward salarylbenefit recommendations from the study to Council for approval. o The 2018 study was first presented to Public Safety, Personnel and Planning (PSPP) Committee on 12/11/18. • By policy, the comparable cities must be located in Snohomish, King, Pierce, [and] or Thurston counties; with a population that is no more than 10,000 over or no more than 10,000 under the population of the City of Edmonds. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes April 23, 2019 Page 20 Packet Pg. 25 o The application of the above criteria is then utilized to select a minimum of eight (8) agencies that are closest in population to the City of Edmonds. 0 2018 comparable cities (by population): Burien (51,850) Lake Stevens (32,750) Puyallup (41,100) Bothell (45,260) Lynnwood (38,260) University Place (32,820) Issaquah (37,110) Lacey (50,170) o By policy, the compensation philosophy is to pay at the median of the market comparators. o Benefits have been compared separately (as has been the study presentation practice), however, the benefits comprise an important part of total compensation. Study Analysis Methodology "Matching" o Each position is compared to other positions at the comparators cities to see if there is a "MATCH." o If a position is a "MATCH," then the position's duties, at Edmonds are at least an 80% match (by policy) for the scope of duties at the comparator city. o If not, they are considered a "NO MATCH." This may mean that a position of similar title or identical title at a comparator city may not be a match for the survey position in Edmonds. ■ For example, with the Public Works Director position, the City of Burien's Public Works Director position is not responsible for utilities, WWTP, fleet or facilities. For this reason, the survey reflects "NO MATCH." o Also, some positions have been "levelled" with up to an additional % added to the pay range (such as an extra 5% for the PW Director for oversight of the WWTP, which other cities do not have). Study Analysis Methodology - Midpoints o The Council approved policy language states: ■ Every three years, based upon the survey data, the Mayor will recommend salary range market adjustments for non -represented positions to City Council. The Mayor will consider the following criteria in developing the recommendation: - Maintain the mid -point of each salary range between 5% high/low of the mid -point of the comparator city - median. - Positions requiring adjustment will be assigned to the new salary range within the salary range table that places the position closest to the comparator city median. o All of the Director and Assistant Chief of Police positions (with the exception of the Police Chief position), based on the study, are out of alignment with the median of the midpoint by policy and are recommended for adjustment to the next pay band. They are also out of alignment with the top end of their salary range(s) for both 2018 and 2019, which can affect pay competitiveness and recruitment. Study Analysis - Midpoint o Median, Current Edmonds Range, Proposed Base Range for min, mid and max, and Edmonds current actual pay range for Assistant Police Chief, and all Director positions o Minus 5% from the midpoint of the median of the comparator cities, by policy it must be within 5% of the range and if not, by policy, the salary moves to the next pay range o Chart of Directors and ACOPs comparing 2019 data with 3% COLA with other cities ■ Salaries are still not in alignment with median midpoint Study Data Results o Independent study information was presented at the 4/16/19 Council meeting that was not the basis of the Mayor's recommendations. o The 4/16/19 study information presented at Council has been reviewed with the Mayor's recommendations (from the City policy based study completed by HR) in order to better understand the Mayor's recommendations. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes April 23, 2019 Page 21 Packet Pg. 26 4.2.a o In review, the Mayor's study data confirms the Mayor's study recommendations for the Directors (except the Police Chief — that position is not recommended for a salary range increase) and the Assistant Chiefs) salary increases and the 2.5% deferred compensation contribution for the Police Chief in order to maintain external equity and competiveness. o The resulting slides show a review of the information that was provided at the 4/16/19 Council meeting with data from the HR completed study. Review of 4/16 Study Data Sheets for each Director and ACOP position o Many cities no longer have ACOP and have a commander structure; these are not comparator positions to ACOP. o Burien, who contracts with King County Sheriff's Office, is not a comparator city 2018 and 2019 Study Data for the Mayor's Recommendations for each Director and ACOP position Directors Leave Benefits — Study Data o The Director positions do not receive any "additional" compensation or "extra" benefits, which other comparator cities receive. o The City's Manager and also the Director positions receive Management Leave annually by Council approved policy: ■ 8.20 MANAGEMENT LEAVE to be more competitive in the market place, the City will provide non -represented employees who are ineligible for compensatory time with 24 hours of Management Leave annually. Management Leave will have no cash -out value and will not be carried over at the end of the calendar year. o The following data sheet shows a comparison of director position leaves compared to the comparator cities. This data was provided at the 12/11/18 PSPP Committee meeting as well as for the 4/2/19 Council meeting. ■ Bothell — Managers and Directors eligible for up to 80 hours of management leave annually ■ Burien — No additional leave ■ Edmonds — Managers and Directors receive 24 hours of management leave per year ■ Issaquah — Directors may accrue 150 compensatory hours per year ■ Lacey — No additional leave ■ Lake Stevens — Directors receive 80 hours of additional leave per year ■ Lynnwood — Directors receive up to 80 hours of merit/administrative leave per year ■ Puyallup — All employees may receive 16 hours of management leave per year ■ University Place — All employees may receive up to 40 hours of merit leave per year Police Chief — Other Elements of Compensation o The Police Chief position (as well as the Assistant Police Chief positions(s)), when compared to the market (policy) study comparators, typically receive other, additional forms of total compensation (in addition to base salary) such as: deferred compensation, educational and/or longevity incentives, etc. o The Mayor is recommending a 2.5% base wage, employer contribution into deferred compensation for the Police Chief position. o Examples of the different forms of compensation that are provided by comparator cities. Summary o The Mayor's recommendations are in alignment with the current, Council approved policy language and process for the study. o The Mayor is recommending adjustment to the salary wage ranges for the director positions (except the Police Chief) and the Assistant Police Chief positions(s) by one pay grade as reflective of the HR study results. This would add only one additional pay step (from the current pay grade) to the pay scale for these positions for a maximum total of a 5% increase. o By existing, Council approved, policy language, it will be three (3) years before another study of all of the Non -Represented positions will be performed. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes April 23, 2019 Page 22 Packet Pg. 27 4.2.a o The compensation study policy language is City policy approved by Council. It is solely within the purview of Council to approve changes to the compensation policy (including the labor market and comparator cities) should Council desire to do so. Council President Fraley-Monillas advised every city used in the data she and Ms. Judge compiled was a comparator city. Councilmember Mesaros commented two sets of information were presented tonight; supposedly they are both using comparator cities and he questioned how that was possible and why was there two sets of data. He agreed more with Human Resources' information because it seemed more comprehensive. Ms. Hardie said she could not speak to that without understanding the methodology used to compile the data Council President Fraley-Monillas presented and how the information was derived. She could only speak to the data she has researched. Councilmember Mesaros referred to Council President Fraley-Monillas' "optics" regarding fairness and using county and state elected officials as comparators. He asked if the City has ever used elected officials to compare Directors' salaries. Ms. Hardie answered not that she was aware of. Councilmember Mesaros commented there were a number of Directors at the county level that make more than the County Executive. Ms. Hardie agreed. Councilmember Mesaros said he has gotten to know the Snohomish County Sheriff quite well through his work with Snohomish County 911 and he knew all the Assistant Sheriffs make more than the Sheriff does. It is somewhat common for elected officials to be paid at a much lower level and he anticipated there were thousands of state employees who make more than the Governor. Councilmember Mesaros commented talking about salaries is always a tenuous thing, some make more than others and there is the idea of fairness and responsibility. During his career he was fortunate to work for organizations who did not want to pay their employees the average; they wanted to aspire to be above the average, not necessary at the top of the marketplace, but to ensure they paid their leaders at a level that attracted people to the job and retained them. The loss of personnel is a loss of institutional knowledge; losing institutional knowledge takes a long time to replace. He was appreciative of the work Ms. Hardie put into her analysis, it seems to be complete information, uses the comparator cities and follows the policy that the Council adopted many years ago. It does not seem to be practical to deviate from the policy at this point in time. Councilmember Teitzel referred to the Finance Director position, noting Bothell was not included in Council President Fraley-Monillas' analysis but it was included in Ms. Hardie's analysis. Bothell tends to be a highly paid city by comparison so omitting that would skew the medians. He did not necessarily like or dislike the policy but that is the policy that has been adopted and it was incumbent on the Council to look to the policy for guidance in establishing salaries. The work Ms. Hardie has done follows the policy. In looking at the high band in the current range versus the proposed range, it is within 5% of the median which complies with policy. With regard to Directors that are at the top of the range currently, Councilmember Teitzel referred to Item 4 on the last page of policy which states, "Any employee whose actual salary exceeds the top of the approved salary range will have their salary frozen until such time that market rates or pay range adjustment for their job classification" He asked what actual salary meant. Ms. Hardie said when the study was performed, if a position's actual salary was outside of the salary range it was supposed to be in, it would mean, study or not, their salary would be frozen until such time as there was a market rate or pay range adjustment which means no COLAs. Councilmember Teitzel observed the Council could potentially approve a new salary band and if a Director was at the top of that band, by policy they would not receive the next year's COLA. Ms. Hardie explained Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes April 23, 2019 Page 23 Packet Pg. 28 4.2.a as part of the budget process the Council approves the COLA which is added to the range. There should not be a situation where a position would exceed the pay range; that would only occur with a market study. The COLA increases the bands each year. The Mayor's recommendation is a market rate adjustment to the next band. COUNCILMEMBER MESAROS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TIBBOTT, TO EXTEND THE MEETING UNTIL 10:20 P.M. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Council President Fraley-Monillas acknowledged their analysis did not include every city due to time constraints, but they included a majority of the cities. She asked for confirmation that every Director received a 3% COLA in January and all other staff received a 3% COLA with the exception of ASMI. Ms. Hardie said Police and Law Support received 2.5% based on their contract, the Teamsters and Non - Represented received 3%. Council President Fraley-Monillas referred to the Mayor's Recommendation 2018 Director and ACOP Salary Adjustments, advising her analysis matches that exactly. For example, the Finance Director's current salary with a 3% COLA is approximately $160,000/year which increases the band. The Mayor's proposal is to increase the salary to $162,000. She summarized all the information in their analysis was included in the Mayor's Recommendation 2018 Director and ACOP Salary Adjustments provided by Ms. Hardie. Councilmember Tibbott asked if any wage adjustments were made before the COLAs for any other categories of employees. Ms. Hardie said there are reclassifications as part of the collective bargaining process. Market rate adjustments are not uncommon in that process because HR looks at the total costs of compensation and compares to similar cities. She could not recall which specific positions had been adjusted; the former SEI group included several market rate adjustments. A market rate study is not typically done during each negotiation. Councilmember Tibbott said he was interested in wage adjustment that had been made in other jobs. He asked if Ms. Hardie could recall a time when wage adjustments of this scale had been made in previous years, a wage adjustment of approximately 5%. Ms. Hardie said the difficulty is it is somewhat of an apples to oranges comparison because collective bargaining agreements include the total cost of compensation which includes longevity, educational incentive, deferred compensation, etc. that have been increased. The overall package would need to be compared and she could not speak to the cost of the overall package comparatively speaking because it is very different. They receive a COLA as well as other incentives. In recent collective bargaining processes, there have been increases in other forms of compensation. Councilmember Tibbott asked if those wage adjustments were prior to the COLA or rolled into the COLA. Ms. Hardie answered it is part of the overall package and it depends on what is being negotiated. Councilmember Tibbott said he would like to have an opportunity to study the tables in context with Council President Fraley-Monillas and Ms. Hardie's analyses to determine appropriate adjustments. Councilmember Buckshnis said she did not find any language in the policy about match or no match and asked HR to provide the Council the latest policy. The policy does state that the HR Department will conduct compensation surveys for each non -represented benchmark position no later than September 1", which she said was not achieved. Ms. Hardie said the information provided last week by Councilmember Mesaros included the 5.5 Non -Represented Employees Compensation Policy; the last paragraph on the second page under Market Analysis addresses benchmarked positions and states classifications that are selected as comparable for survey purposes must match the benchmark positions by 80% in level of work and responsibility. The use of the phrase "match/no match" is common public sector practice for compensation studies. With regard to the timing of the survey, Ms. Hardie agreed the policy states September; due to timing issues, the earliest the surveys could be presented was November but it was moved from the November calendar. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes April 23, 2019 Page 24 Packet Pg. 29 4.2.a It was never intended to be a non -transparent process; she was not aware Councilmember Buckshnis wanted the study results to go through the Finance Committee and Council process. She emphasized it was simply a timing issue, not a lack of complete data. Councilmember Teitzel expressed confusion with matching up the numbers. He referred to the Mayor's Recommendation 2018 Director and ACOP Salary Adjustments in Ms. Hardie's presentation which does not include the 3% COLA which indicates the current salary/wage range for the Finance Director is $115,803 to $155,187 versus Council President Fraley-Monillas' numbers that state it includes the 3%COLA. Councilmember Johnson left the meeting at 10:19 p.m. COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TIBBOTT, TO EXTEND THE MEETING FOR 10 MINUTES. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. (Councilmember Johnson was not present for the vote.) Council President Fraley-Monillas clarified the current salary in her analysis for the Finance Director of $159,843 included the COLA and the Mayor's proposal included the 5%. Councilmember Teitzel noted the 2019 Salary/Wage Ranges Recommended New Range in Ms. Hardie's presentation includes the 3% COLA plus the 5%. Ms. Hardie agreed when the information was originally provided it only included 2018 Salary/Wage Ranges because the 3% COLA had not yet been approved. The 2019 Salary/Wage Ranges do include the 3% COLA. Councilmember Teitzel referred to the 2019 Salary/Wage Ranges-3% COLA which reflects a minimum in the salary range for the Finance Director of $119,277 and Council President Fraley- Monillas' analysis reflects $115,803. The 3% COLA is not included in the Mayor's proposal figure in the information provided by Council President Fraley-Monillas. In response to an earlier comment by Councilmember Tibbott, Council President Fraley-Monillas asked how many employees are at the top of the band for their position. Ms. Hardie estimated approximately half as the City had good tenure. Council President Fraley-Monillas asked how the band is increased for those employees. Ms. Hardie said for employees at the top of their band, the only adjustment they receive is a COLA. Council President Fraley-Monillas observed the bands also increased based on the COLA similar to the increase in Directors' band due to the COLA. Councilmember Buckshnis reiterated her suggestion to have an independent consultant do a salary comparison. She asked what that cost in 2012. Ms. Hardie recalled the contract was $50,000 including job descriptions, but due to HR's involvement, it was closer to $30,000. Councilmember Buckshnis asked Ms. Hardie's opinion about having an independent comparison done. Ms. Hardie explained the policy is under Council's purview; the salary comparison was done according to the policy. If the Council wants to hire an independent consultant, she will do whatever is necessary to assist that process. Councilmember Buckshnis said the policy states the analysis is to be done by September 1. Ms. Hardie said there were timing issues due to negotiations. Mayor Earling said Ms. Hardie had done a fabulous job assembling clear, concise information that follows the policy adopted in 2012 and was discussed again in 2015. The work had been done according to policy and it was troubling to have it disputed at this point. If another study was needed, he would support that, but recognized it would take a while and meanwhile 2018-2019 needed to be addressed. He appreciated the work Council President Fraley-Monillas and Ms. Judge had done but it is now April 23. Council President Fraley-Monillas said policy or not, it is within the purview of the Council to determine. She understood there was a policy, but 2012 was 7 years ago and things have changed since then. Mayor Earling agreed but the Council is now five months from when a decision process could have begun and have been made. Council President Fraley-Monillas said since then the Directors have received the same Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes April 23, 2019 Page 25 Packet Pg. 30 4.2.a raise the rest of staff received, a COLA and VEBA contribution. Mayor Earling said staff has tried to make contact throughout this four month period to define the issues. If the Council wanted do another policy review, he was fine with that, but it did not address the current issue. Council President Fraley-Monillas said she understood Mayor Earling's concerns, but she had a less than a part-time staff to do this work and it had been a long process to pull this information together. It may have been clearer if they had had more time to clean it up. Councilmember Mesaros asked how often the salary ranges for other employees are looked at and adjustments made. Ms. Hardie said the last full study was in 2014. Councilmember Mesaros asked if there was a policy related to that. Ms. Hardie said there was not. COUNCILMEMBER MESAROS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL, THAT THE COUNCIL APPROVE THE RECOMMENDATION THAT'S PRESENTED BY THE MAYOR TO INCLUDE THE 2.5% FOR DEFERRED COMPENSATION FOR THE CHIEF OF POLICE. UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION CARRIED (4-2), COUNCILMEMBERS NELSON, MESAROS, TEITZEL AND TIBBOTT VOTING YES; AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT FRALEY- MONILLAS AND COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS VOTING NO. (Councilmember Johnson was not present for the vote.) Council President Fraley-Monillas expressed a desire to continue this discussion when the seventh Councilmember was present, noting Councilmember Johnson had to leave medically. COUNCILMEMBER MESAROS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL, TO EXTEND THE MEETING FOR SEVEN MINUTES. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. (Councilmember Johnson was not present for the vote.) COUNCIL PRESIDENT FRALEY-MONILLAS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO TABLE FURTHER DISCUSSION UNTIL COUNCILMEMBER JOHNSON WAS ABLE TO PROVIDE HER INPUT AS SHE WAS UNAWARE COUNCILMEMBER JOHNSON HAD LEFT. Councilmember Mesaros asked what was being tabled. Council President Fraley-Monillas answered further discussion regarding the salary increase. Councilmember Mesaros noted it had been approved via the previous motion; he restated his motion, to approve the recommendation that's presented by the Mayor including the Police Chief of 2.5% for deferred compensation. Several Councilmembers indicated they only heard the portion regarding the Police Chief's deferred compensation. Mr. Taraday said if there was confusion over the motion, a Councilmember voting in favor of the motion could move for reconsideration based upon the confusion. Councilmember Mesaros restated his motion: to approve the information presented by the Mayor, including the 2.5% deferred compensation for the Police Chief. COUNCILMEMBER NELSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TIBBOTT, TO RECONSIDER THE MOTION. COUNCIL PRESIDENT FRALEY-MONILLAS WITHDREW HER MOTION (TO TABLE) WITH THE AGREEMENT OF THE SECOND. MOTION CARRIED (5-1), COUNCILMEMBER MESAROS VOTING NO. (Councilmember Johnson was not present for the vote.) COUNCIL PRESIDENT FRALEY-MONILLAS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO TABLE THE DISCUSSION ON ITEM 9.3 PENDING THE RETURN OF Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes April 23, 2019 Page 26 Packet Pg. 31 COUNCILMEMBER JOHNSON IN TWO WEEKS. UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION CARRIED (4- 2), COUNCIL PRESIDENT FRALEY-MONILLAS AND COUNCILMEMBERS NELSON, COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, AND COUNCILMEMBER TIBBOTT VOTING YES; AND COUNCILMEMBER MESAROS AND COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL VOTING NO. (Councilmember Johnson was not present for the vote.) 10. MAYOR'S COMMENTS Mayor Earling reported on the auction for Clothes for Kids that raised $125,000 and the Easter egg hunt at the Frances Anderson Center field. II. COUNCIL COMMENTS Councilmember Nelson expressed appreciation for the Council's decision tonight to support the interim ordinance on non -conforming condominiums and other multifamily buildings. The ordinance is a temporary measure and responsive solution to an immediate problem. Acting quickly to protect citizens from the City's error is what a responsive government should do. Council President Fraley-Monillas advised she will schedule discussion on the Non -Represented Staff Salary Increases early on a future agenda, likely May 7'. She reminded there is no Council meeting next Tuesday, April 30. Councilmember Tibbott suggested when the topic of Non -Represented Staff Salary Increases returns to Council, he would like to see the charts side -by -side and arranged in the same way to facilitate comparison. He announced today was Mayor Earling's birthday and his 25t' wedding anniversary. Councilmember Buckshnis wished Mayor Earling Happy Birthday. She was ecstatic the legislature passed the orca-related bills including vessel noise and disturbance, oil transport which reduces the threat of oil spills, and habitat protection which keeps vessels further from orcas. 12. CONVENE IN EXECUTIVE SESSION REGARDING PENDING OR POTENTIAL LITIGATION PER RCW 42.30.110(1)(i) This item was not needed. 13. RECONVENE IN OPEN SESSION. POTENTIAL ACTION AS A RESULT OF MEETING IN EXECUTIVE SESSION This item was not needed. 14. ADJOURN With no further business, the Council meeting was adjourned at 10:40 p.m. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes April 23, 2019 Page 27 Packet Pg. 32 4.3 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 05/7/2019 Approval of claim, payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire payments. Staff Lead: Scott James Department: Administrative Services Preparer: Nori Jacobson Background/History Approval of claim checks #236493 through #236597 dated April 25, 2019 for $747,949.44, checks #236598 through #236686 dated May 2, 2019 for $409,254.95 and wire payments of $2,359.41 and 417.67. Approval of payroll direct deposit and checks #63720 through #63726 for $598,150.41, benefit checks #63727 through #63731 and wire payments of $576,575.83 for the pay period April 16, 2019 through April 30, 2019. Staff Recommendation Approval of claim, payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire payments. Narrative In accordance with the State statutes, City payments must be approved by the City Council. Ordinance #2896 delegates this approval to the Council President who reviews and recommends either approval or non -approval of expenditures. Attachments: claims 04-25-19 claims 05-02-19 wire 04-19-19 wire 04-30-19 FrequentlyUsedProjNumbers 05-01-19 payroll summary 05-05-19 payroll benefit 05-05-19 Packet Pg. 33 4.3.a vchlist 04/25/2019 7:45:54AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 236493 4/25/2019 076040 911 SUPPLY INC Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account 72958 INV 72958 EDMONDS PD - SAUNDE NAMETAPES FOR JACKETS 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 SEAM SEAL FOR JACKET 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 BLAUER 4660 SOFT SHELL JACKE- 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 BLAUER 9820 TAC SHELL JACKET 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 10.0% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 73210 CM 73210 - SAUNDERS JACKET - C NAMETAPES FOR JACKETS 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 G SEAM SEAL PATCH 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 BLAUER 4660 SOFTSHELL JACKET 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 G BLAUER 9820 TACSHELL JACKET 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 10.0% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 73302 INV 73302 - EDMONDS PD - PANTS BLAUER 8567 PANTS 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 10.0% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 73303 INV 73303 EDMONDS PD - STOCKIr BLAUER 160 B. WARM CAPS 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 POLICE EMBROIDERED ON CAPS 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 10.0% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 Page: 1 aD L 3 c �a .y Amoun 0 a aD r U d 16.0( N 10.0( m t 119.9c v m 229.9� d 37.6( �a 0 L -16.0( a -10.0( E -11 9.9� ,- 0 -229.9� > 0 L Q -37.6( Q rn 84.9� 6 N 8.5( c E M 199.9( U c 80.0( t 27.9� Q Page: 1 Packet Pg. 34 vchlist 04/25/2019 7:45:54AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 236493 4/25/2019 076040 911 SUPPLY INC 236494 4/25/2019 070090 AADVANCED PRODUCTS LLC Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) 73304 INV 73304 EDMONDS PD - GAGNEF EMBROIDERED NAMETAPES & VEL 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 EXTERNAL VEST CARRIER 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 TOURNIQUET POUCH 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 HEATPRESS LETTERS 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 10.0% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 73308 INV 73308 EDMONDS PD - KERN SI BLAUER 8421 S/S SHIRT 001.000.41.521.11.24.00 10.0% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.11.24.00 73309 INV 73309 EDMONDS PD - BURKLA BLAUER 8421 S/S SHIRT 001.000.41.521.11.24.00 10.0% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.11.24.00 73310 INV 73310 EDMONDS PD - GAGNEF SAFARILAND 2.0 SX02 3A BALL. VE 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 VEST COVER 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 SOFT TRAUMA PLATE 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 10.0% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 Total 20042021 INV 20042021 EDMONDS PD COUNTER ASSAULT 1-41F FOGGER; 001.000.41.521.40.31.00 4.3.a Page: 2 a� L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 a m U m 26.0( 200.0( m 36.0( u 20.0( c 28.2( �a 0 44.9� >+ M a 4.5( U 4- 44.9c 0 7a 4.5( o a a Q 855.0( rn 80.0( N 0 20.0( M 95.5( Z 1,861.0E W E t U �a 550.2( Q Page: 2 Packet Pg. 35 vchlist 04/25/2019 7:45:54AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 4.3.a Page: 3 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 236494 4/25/2019 070090 AADVANCED PRODUCTS LLC (Continued) Freight 001.000.41.521.40.31.00 8.9E Tota I : 559.1 E 236495 4/25/2019 070322 A&A LANGUAGE SERVICES INC 15-68969 CANTONESE INTERPRETER COUR CANTONESE INTERPRETER COUR 001.000.23.512.50.41.01 168.5E Total : 168.5E 236496 4/25/2019 065052 AARD PEST CONTROL 20219 MEADOWDALE CC PEST CONTROI MEADOWDALE CC PEST CONTROI 001.000.64.576.80.41.00 99.3( Total: 99.3E 236497 4/25/2019 077039 ALL STAR POOL & SPA INC 13590 PM: YOST POOL DIVING BOARD PM: YOST POOL DIVING BOARD 125.000.64.594.76.65.00 5,147.2( 10.4% Sales Tax 125.000.64.594.76.65.00 535.3" Total : 5,682.51 236498 4/25/2019 063862 ALPINE PRODUCTS INC TM-183470 E9DB.CROSSWALK FLAGS E9DB.Crosswalk Flags 126.000.68.595.33.65.00 345.0( Freight 126.000.68.595.33.65.00 25.6z 10.3% Sales Tax 126.000.68.595.33.65.00 38.1 E Tota I : 408.8, 236499 4/25/2019 074306 AMWINS GROUP BENEFITS INC 31686 RETIREE PREMIUMS - MAY LEOFF PREMIUMS 009.000.39.517.20.23.10 8,428.6E FIRE PREMIUMS 617.000.51.517.20.23.10 1.193.1( Page: 3 Packet Pg. 36 vchlist 04/25/2019 7:45:54AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # 236499 4/25/2019 074306 074306 AMWINS GROUP BENEFITS INC (Continued) 236500 4/25/2019 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 1991179114 1991179115 Description/Account Total ; PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE 111.000.68.542.90.41.00 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE 422.000.72.531.90.41.00 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE 423.000.75.535.80.41.00 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.65.518.20.41.00 10.4% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.90.41.00 10.4% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 10.4% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.41.00 10.4% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.41.00 10.4% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE 001.000.65.518.20.41.00 FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS & MAT FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS 511.000.77.548.68.24.00 FLEET DIVISION MATS 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 10.4% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.24.00 10.4% Sales Tax 4.3.a Page: 4 Amoun 1 i 9,621.7; 6.1- -0 N 6.1- 6.1- c 6.1- 6.0£ 0 �a a 0.6z E 0.6z U 4- 0 0.6z > 0 L 0.6z a Q 0.6" rn 1.6" N 0 9.2� . R U 19.1( aD 0.9; E U �a Q Page: 4 Packet Pg. 37 vchlist 04/25/2019 7:45:54AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 236500 4/25/2019 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES (Continued) 1991183488 1991189311 1991189312 PO # Description/Account 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS 001.000.66.518.30.24.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.24.00 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE 001.000.65.518.20.41.00 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE 111.000.68.542.90.41.00 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE 422.000.72.531.90.41.00 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE 423.000.75.535.80.41.00 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.65.518.20.41.00 10.4% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.90.41.00 10.4% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 10.4% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.41.00 10.4% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.41.00 10.4% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS & MAT FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS 511.000.77.548.68.24.00 4.3.a Page: 5 aD L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 a aD 1.9£ 'D U m 31.4, N 3.2, v 1.6' c aD M 6.1' �a 6.1' o L 6.1' a E 6.1 - 'ca 6.0£ 0 7a 0.1 m, o a a 0.6, Q rn 0.6, N 0.6z o 0.6z 9 0.6' a� E t 9.2� Q Page: 5 Packet Pg. 38 vchlist 04/25/2019 7:45:54AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 236500 4/25/2019 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES (Continued) 1991193628 1991193630 236501 4/25/2019 070670 AUTHOR TALL TALES 4/17/19 BEST BOOK 236502 4/25/2019 077010 AZIMZADEH, ROYA 04182019 236503 4/25/2019 072577 BAURECHT, MAGRIT LTAC-1245 PO # Description/Account FLEET DIVISION MATS 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 10.4% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.24.00 10.4% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 WWTP: 4/10/19 UNIFORMS,TOWEL Mats/Towels 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 Uniforms 423.000.76.535.80.24.00 10.4% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 10.4% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.24.00 FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS 001.000.66.518.30.24.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.24.00 Total EAC: 4/17/19 BEST BOOK RECEPTI EAC: 4/17/19 BEST BOOK RECEPTI 117.100.64.573.20.41.00 Total 1 DAY JURY SERVICE 04/18/2019 8; 1 DAY JURY SERVICE 04/18/2019 8; 001.000.23.512.50.49.20 Total PRINTING OF TOURISM BROCHUR Printing of tourism brochures 120.000.31.575.42.41.00 4.3.a Page: 6 a� L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 a m 19.1( L 0.91 N 1.9E v 47.8E c a� 3.5( �a 4.9E o L �a 0.3E E 31.4, u 0 3.2, > 259.8: o a a Q rn 100.0( 100.0( N 0 E 13.1' R 13.1: c a� E t U 3,095.0( Q Page: 6 Packet Pg. 39 vchlist 04/25/2019 7:45:54AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 236503 4/25/2019 072577 BAURECHT, MAGRIT 236504 236505 W-1.7iZ: 236507 4/25/2019 077011 BECKER, ANDREA Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice (Continued) LTAC-1246 04182019 4/25/2019 075734 BEHAVIORAL HEALTH & CRISIS CON 3/31/19 4/25/2019 076260 BELAIR, ROGER 4/25/2019 077012 BLUME, BRYAN 7246 7247 PICKLEBALL 04182019 PO # Description/Account Charge for splitting delivery 120.000.31.575.42.41.00 10.4% Sales Tax 120.000.31.575.42.41.00 DESIGN ADJUSTMENT FOR 2019 Ti Design adjustment for 2019 tourism 120.000.31.575.42.41.00 Total 1 DAY JURY SERVICE 04/18/2019 8; 1 DAY JURY SERVICE 04/18/2019 8: 001.000.23.512.50.49.20 Total PEER SUPPORT SERVICES - 1 ST G 1/8/19 PEER SUPPORT MTG. 001.000.41.521.10.41.00 2/1/19 - 1:1 PEER SUPPORT CONTF 001.000.41.521.10.41.00 3/12/19 CSD FOR INFANT DEATH 001.000.41.521.10.41.00 Total 7246 7247 PICKLEBALL CLINIC INS' 7246 PICKLEBALL CLINIC BEGINNE 001.000.64.571.25.41.00 7247 PICKLEBALL CLINIC INTERME 001.000.64.571.25.41.00 Total 1 DAY JURY SERVICE 04/18/2019 8: 1 DAY JURY SERVICE 04/18/2019 8: 001.000.23.512.50.49.20 Total 4.3.a Page: 7 a� L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 a m 55.0( u L 321.8E N m z 552.5( U 4,024.3F 5 c 11.1E � 11.1E o L �a a 150.0( •� U 100.0( c Ta 200.0( p 450.0( a a Q rn 60.0( N 105.0( 165.0( E 2 U c 13.7- E 13.71 t U �a Q Page: 7 Packet Pg. 40 vchlist 04/25/2019 7:45:54AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 4.3.a Page: 8 a� L 3 Bank code : usbank c �a Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun N 236508 4/25/2019 077013 BRAVETTI, SYLVIO 04182019 1 DAY JURY SERVICE 04/18/2019 8: 0 m 1 DAY JURY SERVICE 04/18/2019 8; -0 001.000.23.512.50.49.20 13.0, u Total: 13.0: •`- 236509 4/25/2019 072005 BROCKMANN, KERRY 7275 7279 YOGA 7275 7279 YOGA INSTRUCTION N 7275 YOGA GENTLE WED CLASS If 001.000.64.571.27.41.00 469.2E 7279 YOGA TH W/ KERRY CLASS II` 001.000.64.571.27.41.00 232.1( 7283 7271 CLASS 7283 7271 PILATES AND YOGA INS- 7283 PILATES CLASS INSTRUCTIOI 001.000.64.571.27.41.00 394.5z 7271 YOGA WED W/ KERRY CLASS o 001.000.64.571.27.41.00 778.2E j, Total: 1,874.1° a 236510 4/25/2019 069295 BROWN, CANDY 4/17/19 CLASS VISIT 4/17/19 BIRD NATURALIST CLASSR 4/17/19 BIRD NATURALIST CLASSR U 001.000.64.571.23.41.00 47.6E c Total: 47.6( 236511 4/25/2019 077038 BRYAN & LAURI OLSON 1-24975 #500079864-KD UTILITY REFUND 0 a #500079864-KD Utility refund - receN 0- Q 411.000.233.000 176.1 £ Total : 176.1 f r' 236512 4/25/2019 074776 BUCKSHNIS, DIANE Buckshnis /Tree Brd REFRESHMENTS FOR TREE BOAR N Refreshments for Tree Board Earth D o 001.000.62.524.10.31.00 14.9E Buckshnis Tree Board REFRESHMENTS FOR EARTH DAY Refreshments for Earth Day 001.000.62.524.10.31.00 68.5E Buckshnis, D - TreeB REFRESHMENTS FOR TREE BOAR 0 Refreshments for Tree Board Plantinc E t 001.000.62.524.10.31.00 20.1, Q Page: 8 Packet Pg. 41 vchlist 04/25/2019 7:45:54AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 236512 4/25/2019 074776 074776 BUCKSHNIS, DIANE 236513 4/25/2019 077034 BURLEY, SHANNON 236514 4/25/2019 073029 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) Total 4/23/2019 CLAIM FOR EXPENSES - 2019 WRF REIMBURSE TRAVEL EXPENSES R 001.000.64.571.22.43.00 Total 19988522 INV 19988522 EDMONDS PD COPIER LEASE IR6255 - APR 2019 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 B/W COPIES IR6255 - MARCH 2O19 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 COPIER LEASE IRC3325I - APR 201 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 B/W COPIES IRC3325I - MARCH 20 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 COLOR COPIES IRC5240A- MAR 2( 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 COLOR COPIES IRC3325I - MARCH 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 COPIER LEASE IRC5240A - APR 20 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 B/W COPIES IRC5240A- MARCH 2C 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 19988523 COURT PHOTOCOPY MACHINE CC COURT PHOTOCOPY MACHINE CC 001.000.23.512.50.45.00 COURT PHOTOCOPY MACHINE B1A 001.000.23.512.50.45.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.23.512.50.45.00 19988524 C/A 572105 CONTRACT# 3091 /0521 Finance dept copier contract charge 001.000.31.514.23.45.00 4.3.a Page: 9 W L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 103.7( 0 U d L_ 223.8 1 223.8 A m z v 151.8, m c d 17.4' -a c �a 60.7( — 0 10.1( a 26.4E •� U 56.0 c 7a 89.0E p L a 160.0( Q 23.1( N 59.5, N E 75.4, f° 14.0< y z U 209.6' Q Page: 9 Packet Pg. 42 vchlist 04/25/2019 7:45:54AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 236514 4/25/2019 073029 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) B&W Meter usage IRC5250 001.000.31.514.23.45.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.31.514.23.45.00 Color Meter usage IRC5250 001.000.31.514.23.45.00 19988525 CITY CLERKS COPIER LEASE 4/1/1 CITY CLERKS COPIER LEASE 4/1/1 001.000.25.514.30.45.00 19988526 PARKS & REC C5250 COPIER CON' PARKS & REC C5250 COPIER CON' 001.000.64.571.21.45.00 19988527 CANON 5250 contract charge April 2019 001.000.22.518.10.45.00 contract charge April 2019 001.000.61.557.20.45.00 contract charge April 2019 001.000.21.513.10.45.00 bw meter usage March 2019 001.000.22.518.10.45.00 bw meter usage March 2019 001.000.61.557.20.45.00 clr meter usage March 2019 001.000.22.518.10.45.00 clr meter usage March 2019 001.000.61.557.20.45.00 clr meter usage March 2019 001.000.21.513.10.45.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.22.518.10.45.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.61.557.20.45.00 10.4% Sales Tax 4.3.a Page: 10 a� L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 a m 24.6E u L 31.4( N 67.8( v 11018.7f c a� c 401.0E 0 L 167.6E a E 20.9E .� w 20.9E 0 0 22.5( o a a 2.8- Q rn 93.2( N 11.6E o 11.6E 9 29.4E 3.6E t U �a Q Page: 10 Packet Pg. 43 vchlist 04/25/2019 7:45:54AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 4.3.a Page: 11 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account a� L 3 c �a Amoun y 236514 4/25/2019 073029 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES (Continued) 0 001.000.21.513.10.45.00 as 3.6� -0 bw meter usage March 2019 001.000.21.513.10.45.00 2.8, .L 19988529 CANON 2501F contract charge April 2019 001.000.21.513.10.45.00 26.4z BWmeter usage March 2019 U 001.000.21.513.10.45.00 1.8� color meter usage March 2019 c 001.000.21.513.10.45.00 18.8 1 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.21.513.10.45.00 4.9' 19988530 BLD PRINTER/COPIER: CONTRAC' 0 Bld Printer/Copier: Contract/copies `>, 001.000.62.524.10.45.00 40.1 � a 19988531 PLANNING COPIER/PRINTER CON - Planning Copier/Printer contract/copif 001.000.62.524.10.45.00 39.3' u 19988532 P&R PRINTER IRC2501F CONTRAC' 0 P&R PRINTER IRC2501F CONTRAC' 001.000.64.571.21.45.00 90.1' o 19988533 PARK MAINT IRC2501F COPIER COI a a PARKS IRC2501F COPIER CONTRAi Q 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 65.1 19988535 RECEPTION DESK CITY CLERKS C RECEPTION DESK CITY CLERKS C N 001.000.25.514.30.45.00 36.7( c 19988536 COUNCIL CANON COPIER LEASE E April Contract Charge 001.000.11.511.60.45.00 26.4z B/W Meter Usage }; 001.000.11.511.60.45.00 3.1( W Color Meter Usage E t 001.000.11.511.60.45.00 63.4E um Q Page: 11 Packet Pg. 44 vchlist 04/25/2019 7:45:54AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 236514 4/25/2019 073029 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES 236515 236516 236517 4/25/2019 071816 CARLSON, JESSICA Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice (Continued) 19988537 19992524 19992525 7151 DRAWING 4/25/2019 075023 CAROLYN DOUGLAS COMMUNICATION 89 4/25/2019 003360 CENTENNIAL GLASS 26012 PO # Description/Account 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.11.511.60.45.00 INV 19988537 EDMONDS PD - CAN( COPIER LEASE C5550 - APR 2019 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 B/W COPIES C5550 - MARCH 2O19 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 COLOR COPIES C5550 - MARCH 2C 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 INV 19988549 EDMONDS PD - FAX I LEASE - FAX BOARD - APR 2019 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 ENG COPIER APRIL 2019 Eng Copier April 2019 001.000.67.518.21.45.00 DEV. SERV. COPIER/PRINTER: Dev. Serv. Copier/Printer: 001.000.62.524.10.45.00 Total 7151 ADVENTURES IN ANIME WOP 7151 ADVENTURES IN ANIME WOP 001.000.64.571.22.41.00 Total COMMUNICATIONS CONSULTANT/ Consulting: Communications and 001.000.61.557.20.41.00 Total PM: 28" CLEAR 1/4" POLYCARBON/ 4.3.a Page: 12 aD L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 a m 9.61 u 185.7z 19 m t 31.2( u 4 352.3( c 59.2( �a 0 36.0, >+ M a 3.7E E U 4- 630.1- 0 Ta 0 L 915.4£ a 5,528.3, Q rn N 137.5( c 137.5( ,n E 2 U 2,500.0( r- 2,500.0( E t U �a Q Page: 12 Packet Pg. 45 vchlist 04/25/2019 7:45:54AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 236517 4/25/2019 003360 CENTENNIAL GLASS Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice (Continued) 236518 4/25/2019 067314 CERTIFIED FOLDER DISPLAY SVC LTAC-562579 236519 4/25/2019 068116 CLIFTON, STEPHEN 04182019 236520 4/25/2019 076914 CM DESIGN GROUP LLC 19006 236521 4/25/2019 064369 CODE PUBLISHING CO 63239 236522 4/25/2019 065566 COLLINS, AMY COLLINS 4/19 PO # Description/Account PM: 28" CLEAR 1/4" POLYCARBON/ 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 Total DISTRIBUTION OF TOURISM BROC Distribution of tourism brochures 120.000.31.575.42.41.00 Total 1 DAY JURY SERVICE 04/18/2019 8: 1 DAY JURY SERVICE 04/18/2019 8: 001.000.23.512.50.49.20 Total E9CA.SERVICES THRU 3/31/19 E9CA.Services thru 3/31/19 112.000.68.542.30.41.00 E9CA.Services thru 3/31/19 125.000.68.542.30.41.00 E9CA.Services thru 3/31/19 126.000.68.542.30.41.00 Total CITY CODE WEB UPDATE & ORDIN EDMONDS CITY CODE WEB UPDAI 001.000.25.514.30.41.00 Total COLLINS EXPENSE CLAIM - NEW V AIRFARE TO/FM DALLAS, TX 001.000.41.521.40.43.00 AIRPORT PARKING 4/7-4/10/19 001.000.41.521.40.43.00 4.3.a Page: 13 aD L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 a m 125.0( u L 13.1< 138.1: m v 4,787.5' 4,787Z5 c �a 13.2E 13.2E a E U 5,381.8, c Ta 4,346.3< o a 41856.8( Q 14,585.0( " rn N 236.2, o 236.2, 2 U 431.6" (D E t 120.0( um Q Page: 13 Packet Pg. 46 vchlist 04/25/2019 7:45:54AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 236522 4/25/2019 065566 COLLINS, AMY Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice (Continued) 236523 4/25/2019 077014 COPLAND, DAWN 04182019 236524 4/25/2019 064531 DINES, JEANNIE 19-3927 236525 4/25/2019 072145 DISTINCTIVE WINDOWS INC 21697 236526 4/25/2019 076610 EDMONDS HERO HARDWARE 1296 1299 PO # Description/Account UBER TO DALLAS HOTEL 001.000.41.521.40.43.00 HOTEL 4/7-4/10/19 001.000.41.521.40.43.00 PER DIEM - 3 BREAKFAST, 1 LUNC 001.000.41.521.40.43.00 UBER TO DALLAS/FW AIRPORT 001.000.41.521.40.43.00 Total 1 DAY JURY SERVICE 04/18/2019 8; 1 DAY JURY SERVICE 04/18/2019 8: 001.000.23.512.50.49.20 Total 4/09/19 COMMITTEE MIN & 4/16/19 4/9/19 PPW COMM 001.000.25.514.30.41.00 Total PM: OLYMPIC BEACH RESTROOME PM: OLYMPIC BEACH RESTROOME 125.000.64.594.76.65.41 10.4% Sales Tax 125.000.64.594.76.65.41 Total PM SUPPLIES: NUTS, BOLTS, SCRE PM SUPPLIES: NUTS, BOLTS, SCRE 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 PM SUPPLIES: NUTS, BOLTS, SCRE PM SUPPLIES: NUTS, BOLTS, SCRE 125.000.64.576.80.31.00 4.3.a Page: 14 a� L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 a m 32.9, u L 722.E N 56.7E v 28.4, 1,392.4 c d c �a 18.21 o 18.2' �a a E 486.5( U 486.5( c Ta 0 a 2,041.4E Q 212.3" 2,253.75 N 0 E 24.34 'M 2.5' aD E t 25.1 , Q Page: 14 Packet Pg. 47 vchlist 04/25/2019 7:45:54AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 236526 4/25/2019 076610 EDMONDS HERO HARDWARE 236527 236528 236529 236530 4/25/2019 008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice (Continued) 1301 IiBlIM 4-34080 4/25/2019 008812 ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINES AR132878 4/25/2019 008969 ENGLAND, CHARLES 4/25/2019 008975 ENTENMANN ROVIN CO 7055 DANCE 7056 DANCE 0142807-IN PO # Description/Account 10.4% Sales Tax 125.000.64.576.80.31.00 PM SUPPLIES: PRIMER PM SUPPLIES: PRIMER 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 PM SUPPLIES: NUTS, BOLTS, SCRE PM SUPPLIES: NUTS, BOLTS, SCRE 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 Total LIFT STATION #14 7909 211TH PL S' LIFT STATION #14 7909 211TH PL S' 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 Total ACCT#MK5648 CONTRACT 2600-02 Maintenance for printers 04/21/19 - 512.000.31.518.88.48.00 10.4% Sales Tax 512.000.31.518.88.48.00 Total 7055 BALLROOM DANCE INSTRUC 7055 BALLROOM DANCE INSTRUC' 001.000.64.571.22.41.00 7056 WEST COAST SWING DANCE 7056 WEST COAST SWING DANCE 001.000.64.571.22.41.00 Total INV 0142807-IN ACCT 0011847 EDM 4.3.a Page: 15 a� L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 a m 2.6- u L_ 13 15.1E m z 1.5E U m c 6.7E M c 0.7- 78.8d o L a 51.2, 51.2: 0 Ta 0 307.2( a a Q 31.9E 339.1E r' N 0 341.0( E 190.9E 531.9E E t U �a Q Page: 15 Packet Pg. 48 vchlist 04/25/2019 7:45:54AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 236530 4/25/2019 008975 ENTENMANN ROVIN CO 236531 236532 Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice (Continued) 4/25/2019 075136 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE ASSOC 144937 4/25/2019 077037 ESTATE OF ELVA ERICKSON 4-22825 PO # Description/Account 30 YEAR SERVICE PINS 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 25 YEAR SERVICE PINS 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 20 YEAR SERVICE PINS 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 10 & 15 YEAR SERVICE PINS 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 EMPLOY & OFFICER OF YEAR BAD 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 CITIZEN SERVICE CITATION PINS 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 NEW OFFICER BADGES 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 NEW CORPORAL BADGE 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 NEW SERGEANT BADGE 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 NEW STAFF ASST. BADGES 001.000.41.521.11.24.00 PACKAGEINSURANCE 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 PACKAGE & HANDLING FEES 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 Freight 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 Total PROF. SERV.: CLIMATE GOALS & P Prof. Serv.: Climate Goals & Measun 001.000.62.524.10.41.00 Total #40218877-KB1 UTILITY REFUND #40218877-KB1 Utility refund due to 4.3.a Page: 16 aD L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 a m 148.0( u 144.0( N 144.0( U 114.0( m c 190.0( M c 204.0( f° 0 L 490.0( a 98.0( E 98.0( ,- 0 196.0( > 0 23.0( a Q 9.8( 0) 18.0( N 1,876.8( c E 2 U 2,986.2E c 2,986.2E t U �a Q Page: 16 Packet Pg. 49 vchlist 04/25/2019 7:45:54AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 4.3.a Page: 17 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 236532 4/25/2019 077037 ESTATE OF ELVA ERICKSON (Continued) 411.000.233.000 285.4f Tota I : 285.4f 236533 4/25/2019 077015 FITZGERALD, LINDA 04182019 1 DAY JURY SERVICE 04/18/2019 8: 1 DAY JURY SERVICE 04/18/2019 8; 001.000.23.512.50.49.20 13.1 Total : 13.1; 236534 4/25/2019 070777 FROLAND, MARK J FROLAND 4-19 FROLAND EXPENSE CLAIM HNT TF PER DIEM 4/6-4/10/19 001.000.41.521.40.43.00 244.5( Tota I : 244.5( 236535 4/25/2019 011900 FRONTIER 425-775-2455 CIVIC CENTER ALARM LINES 250 5 CIVIC CENTER FIRE AND INTRUSIC 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 68.5, 425-776-3896 FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER AL, FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER FIF 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 138.& Total : 207.3! 236536 4/25/2019 077016 GONZALEZ, NATHAN 04182019 3 DAY JURY SERVICE 3 DAY JURY SERVICE 001.000.23.512.50.49.20 40.7� Tota I : 40.75 236537 4/25/2019 077017 GROVER, MARIA 04182019 3 DAY JURY SERVICE 3 DAY JURY SERVICE 001.000.23.512.50.49.20 41.8' Total : 41.& 236538 4/25/2019 074804 HARLES, JANINE 527274 PHOTOGRAPHY - APRIL 2019 Photography for April 2019 001.000.61.558.70.41.00 200.0( Total : 200.0( Page: 17 Packet Pg. 50 vchlist 04/25/2019 7:45:54AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 4.3.a Page: 18 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account a� L 3 c �a Amoun N 236539 4/25/2019 077035 HART, KIM 2002006.009 REFUND: DANCE CLASS 0 m REFUND: DANCE CLASS 001.000.239.200 124.0( u Total: 124.0( .` 236540 4/25/2019 074966 HIATT CONSULTING LLC 2018-149 TOURISM PROMOTION AND MARKI N Tourism promotion and marketing for 120.000.31.575.42.41.00 1,666.0E r Tourism website maintenance for Apri 120.000.31.575.42.41.00 200.0( Total : 1,866.0( 236541 4/25/2019 073880 HITE, CARRIE 4/23/2019 CLAIM FOR EXPENSES - 2019 WRF REIMBURSE TRAVEL EXPENSES R — 001.000.64.571.21.43.00 203.7< Total: 203.7; a 236542 4/25/2019 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 1070145 PM SUPPLIES: TAPE DISPENSER, ( E PM SUPPLIES: TAPE DISPENSER, ( fd U 125.000.64.576.80.31.00 74.4E — 10.2% Sales Tax —a 125.000.64.576.80.31.00 7.5� o 2205318 PM SUPPLIES: LATCHING BOX, BRi a PM SUPPLIES: LATCHING BOX, BRi Q- Q 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 97.4( 10.2% Sales Tax r' 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 9.91 3974088 PM: GREENHOUSE REFRIGERAT0 N PM: GREENHOUSE REFRIGERATO' o 001.000.64.576.80.35.00 549.0( E 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.35.00 56.5E 5052217 PM SUPPLIES: PAINT PM SUPPLIES: PAINT E 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 17.9 1 10.2% Sales Tax Q Page: 18 Packet Pg. 51 vchlist 04/25/2019 7:45:54AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 236542 4/25/2019 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES (Continued) 5086486 615609 236543 4/25/2019 061013 HONEY BUCKET 0551031236 236544 4/25/2019 077018 HUANG, AILEEN 04182019 236545 4/25/2019 077019 HUNEKE, DAVID 04182019 236546 4/25/2019 076993 INDIGENOUZ PLACEMAKERZ MUSIC AT LIBRARY PO # Description/Account 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 PM SUPPLIES: SPRINKLERS, TRAS PM SUPPLIES: SPRINKLERS, TRAS 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 10.0% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 PM SUPPLIES: LEAF RAKE, HOT W PM SUPPLIES: LEAF RAKE, HOT W 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 10.0% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 PM: PAINT SUPPLIES PM: PAINT SUPPLIES 125.000.64.576.80.31.00 10.2% Sales Tax 125.000.64.576.80.31.00 Total OLYMPIC BEACH RESTROOMS HO OLYMPIC BEACH RESTROOMS HO 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 Total 1 DAY JURY SERVICE 04/18/2019 8: 1 DAY JURY SERVICE 04/18/2019 8; 001.000.23.512.50.49.20 Total 3 DAY JURY SERVICE 3 DAY JURY SERVICE 001.000.23.512.50.49.20 Total : EAC: MUSIC AT LIBRARY: CONTRA, EAC: MUSIC AT LIBRARY: CONTRA, 4.3.a Page: 19 a� L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 a aD 1.8< 'D U d L 178.8" N 17.8E v 255.2f a� 25.5( �a 0 62.7, `5, M a 6.4( 1,361.31 0 Ta 395.0( o L 395.0( a Q rn 13.4E N 1141 � 0 E 34.1 E 34.1 F a� E t U �a Q Page: 19 Packet Pg. 52 vchlist 04/25/2019 7:45:54AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 236546 4/25/2019 076993 INDIGENOUZ PLACEMAKERZ 236547 4/25/2019 073548 INDOFF INCORPORATED Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) 117.100.64.573.20.41.00 Tota I : 3233955 ENGINEERING STAMPS Engineering Stamps 001.000.67.518.21.49.00 Replacement Ink Pad 001.000.67.518.21.49.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.67.518.21.49.00 3235092 OFFICE SUPPLIES SHARED COPY PAPER 001.000.61.557.20.31.00 SHARED COPY PAPER 001.000.21.513.10.31.00 SHARED COPY PAPER 001.000.22.518.10.31.00 CANNED AIR DUSTERS 001.000.22.518.10.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.61.557.20.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.21.513.10.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.22.518.10.31.00 3235754 COPY PAPER Copy paper 001.000.31.514.23.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.31.514.23.31.00 3236739 CATALOG ENVELOPES, POST IT TA Kraft Catalog envelopes, Dymo clear 001.000.31.514.23.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.31.514.23.31.00 4.3.a Page: 20 Page: 20 Packet Pg. 53 vchlist 04/25/2019 7:45:54AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 4.3.a Page: 21 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 236547 4/25/2019 073548 073548 INDOFF INCORPORATED (Continued) Total : 823.9: 236548 4/25/2019 073015 INTERCONNECTION 0926663 PRINTER RECYCLING Printer recycling and handling fee 512.000.31.518.88.49.00 24.0( Total : 24.0( 236549 4/25/2019 075356 JENNIFER ZIEGLER PUBLIC 046 STATE LOBBYIST FOR APRIL 2019 State lobbyist for April 2019 001.000.61.511.70.41.00 3,358.0( Total: 3,358.0( 236550 4/25/2019 077020 KAPPES, CLARENCE 04182019 1 DAY JURY SERVICE 04/18/2019 8: 1 DAY JURY SERVICE 04/18/2019 8; 001.000.23.512.50.49.20 19.1 E Total: 19.1E 236551 4/25/2019 077021 KOHL, RICHARD 04182019 1 DAY JURY SERVICE 04/18/2019 8: 1 DAY JURY SERVICE 04/18/2019 8: 001.000.23.512.50.49.20 11.5- Total : 11.51 236552 4/25/2019 077022 KRAMER, FARAH 04182019 3 DAY JURY SERVICE 3 DAY JURY SERVICE 001.000.23.512.50.49.20 35.5, Tota I : 35.5 , 236553 4/25/2019 077023 KUMMET, CAROL 04182019 1 DAY JURY SERVICE 04/18/2019 8; 1 DAY JURY SERVICE 04/18/2019 8; 001.000.23.512.50.49.20 13.1 Total: 13.1: 236554 4/25/2019 075159 LIFE INSURANCE CO OF NO AMER May Cigna MAY CIGNA PREMIUMS May Cigna insurance premiums 811.000.231.550 12,571.2E Total : 12,571.2E Page: 21 Packet Pg. 54 vchlist 04/25/2019 7:45:54AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 236555 4/25/2019 076001 LUCIE R BERNHEIM, ATTY AT LAW 27189 236556 4/25/2019 074263 LYNNWOOD WINSUPPLYCO 236557 4/25/2019 077024 MATHIAS, PATRICK 236558 4/25/2019 072746 MURRAYSMITH INC PO # Description/Account CONFLICT COUNSEL 7Z0414920 CONFLICT COUNSEL 7Z0414920 001.000.39.512.52.41.00 Total 030099 00 PM: IRRIGATION SUPPLIES PM: IRRIGATION SUPPLIES 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 04182019 18-2194-10 236559 4/25/2019 074866 NORTHWEST PLAYGROUND EQUIPMEN RM04181901 236560 4/25/2019 025690 NOYES, KARIN 00 00 905 Total : 1 DAY JURY SERVICE 04/18/2019 8: 1 DAY JURY SERVICE 04/18/2019 8: 001.000.23.512.50.49.20 Total EBGA.SERVICES THRU 3/31/19 EBGA.Services thru 3/31/19 423.000.75.594.35.65.41 Total PICNIC BENCH FOR SEAVIEW PAR 50% DEPOSIT FOR PICNIC BENCH 127.000.64.575.50.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 127.000.64.575.50.31.00 Total PLANNING BOARD MINUTES 4/10/1 Planning Board Minutes 4/10/19 001.000.62.558.60.41.00 HPC MEETING MINUTES 4/11/19 HPC Meeting Minutes 4/11/19 001.000.62.558.60.41.00 Total 4.3.a Page: 22 aD L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 a m 300.0( u 300.0( .` N m 434.9' 45.2' 480.1( c �a 12.6, 12.6 i a E U 1,758.0( o 1,758.0( 0 0 a a 2,276.9z Q rn 236.8( ,n 2,513.7' 0 E 2 333.0( U c aD 74.0( E 407.0( um Q Page: 22 Packet Pg. 55 vchlist 04/25/2019 7:45:54AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 4.3.a Page: 23 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account a� L 3 c �a Amoun N 236561 4/25/2019 077006 NUUR, MOHAMED BLD2019.0128 REFUND FOR BUILDING PERMIT: 0 m Refund for Building Permit: job scop( 001.000.257.620 38.4( u Total : 38.4( .`- 236562 4/25/2019 077025 OBRIEN, JANET 04182019 1 DAY JURY SERVICE 04/18/2019 8: N 1 DAY JURY SERVICE 04/18/2019 8; 001.000.23.512.50.49.20 10.2 r Total : 10Z m 236563 4/25/2019 077026 PARTIDA, RAFAEL 04182019 3 DAY JURY SERVICE a0i 3 DAY JURY SERVICE 001.000.23.512.50.49.20 41.& r- Total : 41.W — 0 236564 4/25/2019 027450 PAWS MARCH 2O19 ANIMAL SHELTERING - EDMONDS I L >' �a 4 ANIMALS @200 - $135 RECLAIM F a 001.000.41.521.70.41.00 665.0( .E Total: 665.0( 236565 4/25/2019 008350 PETTY CASH 4/24 PARKS PETTY CSH 4/24/19 PARKS PETTY CASH 0 _ BRINTON: Edmonds Kwick N Kleen: fd 001.000.64.571.22.43.00 20.0( o PARKER: Smart Foodservice: Presch a 001.000.64.571.29.31.00 20.1 £ Q PARKER: Fred Meyer: Preschool scie M 001.000.64.571.29.31.00 8.4, ,n BURLEY: Bartell Drugs: Rec supplies 001.000.64.571.22.31.00 11.5E c COLLEY: Joann Fabrics: Discovery E 001.000.64.571.23.31.00 COLLEY: Fred Meyer: Discovery cam 001.000.64.571.23.31.00 26.2( COLLEY: Fred Meyer: Discovery cam t 001.000.64.571.23.31.00 22.2E HASLAM: Trader Joe's: Depratment Q Page: 23 Packet Pg. 56 vchlist 04/25/2019 7:45:54AM Bank code : usbank Voucher List City of Edmonds Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 236565 4/25/2019 008350 PETTY CASH (Continued) 236566 4/25/2019 064088 PROTECTION ONE 291104 236567 4/25/2019 077033 PSYCHLAW F9102018 236568 4/25/2019 070809 PUGET SOUND EXECUTIVE 19-0693 PO # Description/Account 001.000.64.571.21.31.00 CORT: City of Vancouver: WRPA 001.000.64.571.22.43.00 LEACH: Edmonds Hero Hardware: Hi 001.000.64.571.23.31.00 COLLEY: Edmonds Hero Hardware: 001.000.64.571.23.31.00 Total ALARM MONITORING - PARKS MAII ALARM MONITORING FOR PARKS I 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 ALARM MONITORING FOR PARKS I 001.000.64.576.80.42.00 FIRE & ALARM MONITORING FOR F 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 Fire Station #20 - May Fire Monitorinc 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 Old Public Works - May Fire Monitorir 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 Yost Pool - May Fire Monitoring 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 Total EXPERT SERVICES FORENSIC PS` EXPERT SERVICES FORENSIC PS` 001.000.39.512.52.41.00 Total COURT SECURITY 04/08/2019-04/1 COURT SECURITY 04/08/2019-04/1, 001.000.23.512.50.41.00 PROBATION MRT SECURITY 04/10/ 001.000.23.523.30.41.00 4.3.a Page: 24 aD L 3 c �a Amoun y 0 a aD 35.4( 'D r U d 3.8( 4.4( Y m t 17.61 U 177.21 m c aD 24.1- 0 24.1- �a a 86.3" 21.4z u 4- 0 16.5, 0 L 18.1( a 190.55 Q rn N 3,375.0( Iq 3,375.0( N E M 1,127.5( as E 96.2.' U co Q Page: 24 Packet Pg. 57 vchlist 04/25/2019 7:45:54AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # 236568 4/25/2019 070809 070809 PUGET SOUND EXECUTIVE (Continued) 236569 4/25/2019 077040 RAINE, JONNATHAN 03282019 236570 4/25/2019 074834 ROBINSON, JASON 236571 4/25/2019 077027 SCHWABE, GOTTFRIED 236572 4/25/2019 068698 SEBRIS BUSTO JAMES 236573 4/25/2019 066918 SEDOR, NORMAN 236574 4/25/2019 036955 SKY NURSERY 236575 4/25/2019 077028 SLOTHAUG, GUNNAR ROBINSON 4-19 077027 69325 Description/Account Total : LASERFICHE TRAINING RENTON V LASERFICHE TRAINING RENTON V 001.000.23.512.50.43.00 Total ROBINSON EXPENSE CLAIM - HNT PER DIEM SPOKANE 4/6-4/10/19 001.000.41.521.40.43.00 Total 1 DAY JURY SERVICE 04/18/2019 8: 1 DAY JURY SERVICE 04/18/2019 8; 001.000.23.512.50.49.20 Total ANTI -HARASSMENT TRAINING 3/11/2019 training with Tina 001.000.22.518.10.41.00 3/26/2019 training with Jennifer 001.000.22.518.10.41.00 Total 34 REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT 009.000.39.517.20.29.00 Total T-1335603 PM: FLOWER PROGRAM PLANTS PM: FLOWER PROGRAM PLANTS 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 10.2% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 Total 04182019 1 DAY JURY SERVICE 04/18/2019 8; 4.3.a Page: 25 aD L 3 c �a Amoun y 0 1,223.7° 0 U d L_ 43.2� 43.25 m 244.5( m 244.5( a0i c �a 12.2( o 12.2( a E 2,135.0( u 0 2,345.0( 4,480.0( o a a Q rn 6,004.0( 6,004.0( N 0 E 190.8, f° 19.4, y 210.3' E t U �a Q Page: 25 Packet Pg. 58 vchlist 04/25/2019 7:45:54AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 236575 4/25/2019 077028 SLOTHAUG, GUNNAR 236576 4/25/2019 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) 1 DAY JURY SERVICE 04/18/2019 8; 001.000.23.512.50.49.20 Tota I : 200202547 PEDEST CAUTION LIGHT 21930 95- PEDEST CAUTION LIGHT 21930 95- 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 200260271 YOST POOL YOST POOL 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 200348233 TRAFFIC LIGHT 22000 84TH AVE W TRAFFIC LIGHT 22000 84TH AVE W 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 200398956 FIRE STATION #16 8429 196TH ST FIRE STATION #16 8429 196TH ST ; 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 200493146 MAPLEWOOD PARK IRRIGATION M MAPLEWOOD PARK IRRIGATION M 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 200496834 LIFT STATION #10 17526 TALBOT R LIFT STATION #10 17526 TALBOT R 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 200611317 LIFT STATION #9 19300 80TH AVE V LIFT STATION #9 19300 80TH AVE V 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 200638609 OLD PUBLIC WORKS 200 DAYTON OLD PUBLIC WORKS 200 DAYTON 421.000.74.534.80.47.00 200714038 SEAVIEW PARK SEAVIEW PARK 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 200723021 TRAFFIC LIGHT 961 PUGET DR / MI TRAFFIC LIGHT 961 PUGET DR / MI 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 200739845 SEAVIEW RESERVOIR 18520 90TH 4.3.a Page: 26 aD L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 a m 14.81 U 14.8, •L N m 16.0' m c 133.6' M c �a 33.2z o �a a 915.5E U 16.6( IS 7a 0 L 81.5, m Q rn 127.8� N 4 234.0£ N E 2 U 23.2£ c aD E 26.5( U Q Page: 26 Packet Pg. 59 vchlist 04/25/2019 7:45:54AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 236576 4/25/2019 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) SEAVIEW RESERVOIR 18520 90TH 421.000.74.534.80.47.00 200865202 LIFT STATION #3 1529 NORTHSTRE LIFT STATION #3 1529 NORTHSTRE 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 201197084 SEAVIEW PARK SEAVIEW PARK 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 201236825 FISHING PIER RESTROOMS FISHING PIER RESTROOMS 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 201327111 PINE ST PARK PINE ST PARK 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 201431236 PEDEST CAUTION LIGHT 9110 OLY PEDEST CAUTION LIGHT 9110 OLY 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 201431244 PEDEST CAUTION LIGHT 9301 PUC PEDEST CAUTION LIGHT 9301 PUC 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 201441755 TRAFFIC LIGHT 21531 HWY 99 / ME TRAFFIC LIGHT 21531 HWY 99 / ME 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 201551744 SNO-ISLE LIBRARY 650 MAIN ST / IN SNO-ISLE LIBRARY 650 MAIN ST / 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 201572898 TRAFFIC LIGHT 117 3RD AVE S / ME TRAFFIC LIGHT 117 3RD AVE S / ME 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 201751476 TRAFFIC LIGHT 9932 220TH ST SW TRAFFIC LIGHT 9932 220TH ST SW 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 201942489 PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ; PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ; 001.000.65.518.20.47.00 4.3.a Page: 27 aD L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 a m 20.3, u 58.0z Y m t 32.3E m c a� 214.9( �a 0 17.1, `5% M a E 17.11 'ij U 4- 0 16.6( 0 L Q a 189.4- Q rn 1,873.2' N 0 40.8E . �a U 43.1E y E t 91.01 Q Page: 27 Packet Pg. 60 vchlist 04/25/2019 7:45:54AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 236576 4/25/2019 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ; 111.000.68.542.90.47.00 PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ; 421.000.74.534.80.47.00 PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ; 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ; 511.000.77.548.68.47.00 PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ; 422.000.72.531.90.47.00 202250627 9TH/GASPER LANDSCAPED BED 9TH/GASPER LANDSCAPED BED 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 202289450 TRAFFIC LIGHT 21931 HWY 99 / ME TRAFFIC LIGHT 21931 HWY 99 / ME 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 202291662 CIVIC CENTER & FIRE STATION #1 , CIVIC CENTER & FIRE STATION #1, 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 202439246 CITY HALL 121 5TH AVE N / METER CITY HALL 121 5TH AVE N / METER 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 202540647 SIERRA PARK IRRIGATION 8100 191 SIERRA PARK IRRIGATION 8100 191 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 202807632 TRAFFIC LIGHT 8429 196TH ST SW TRAFFIC LIGHT 8429 196TH ST SW 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 203652151 FIVE CORNERS RESERVOIR 85191 FIVE CORNERS RESERVOIR 85191 421.000.74.534.80.47.00 204425847 LIFT STATION #2 702 MELODY LN / LIFT STATION #2 702 MELODY LN / 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 220216386 PEDEST CAUTION LIGHTS 8410 MF 4.3.a Page: 28 aD L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 a m 345.9( u L 345.9( N 345.9( v 345.9( Im- (D c 345.9( m c �a 17.1 1 o L �a a 78.2( U 4- 4,824.2, 0 7a 0 L 2,227.71 Q Q rn 16.6( N 0 17.8� E 2 U 248.6, aD E t 80.3 -, U Page: 28 Packet Pg. 61 Q vchlist 04/25/2019 7:45:54AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 236576 4/25/2019 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice (Continued) 220547574 236577 4/25/2019 037303 SO SNOHOMISH CO FIRE & RESCUE EDMS 2019-5 236578 4/25/2019 074797 SUPER CHARGE MARKETING LLC 5892 236579 4/25/2019 077007 TAP RACK TACTICAL INC 236580 4/25/2019 077029 TAYLOR, ROBERT 236581 4/25/2019 065459 THE HERALD SUBSCRIPTION 236582 4/25/2019 027269 THE PART WORKS INC 386 �ItiE�iiE 4/27/19 ANNUAL I N V40697 PO # Description/Account PEDEST CAUTION LIGHTS 8410 MI 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 TRAFFIC LIGHT SR104 @ 236TH S1 TRAFFIC LIGHT SR104 @ 236TH S1 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 Total MAY-2019 FIRE SERVICES CONTRE May-2019 Fire Services Contract Pay 001.000.39.522.20.41.50 Total SOCIAL MEDIA SERVICES FOR APF Social media services for April 2019 001.000.61.557.20.41.00 Total INV 386 EDMONDS PD - DAVID MA( TACTICAL PISTOL 4/13-14 - MACHA 001.000.41.521.40.49.00 Total 1 DAY JURY SERVICE 04/18/2019 8: 1 DAY JURY SERVICE 04/18/2019 8: 001.000.23.512.50.49.20 Total DAILY 4/27/19-4/26/20 EDMONDS PI YEAR SUBSCRIPTION DAILY HERA 001.000.41.521.10.49.00 Total PM: OLYMPIC BEACH RESTROOMS PM: OLYMPIC BEACH RESTROOME 125.000.64.576.80.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 4.3.a Page: 29 aD L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 a m 69.7' u 70.1( 13,602.9: m c 614,893.1 1 a 614,893.1 , c �a 0 300.0( a 300.0( E U 4- 450.0( c 450.0( c L Q a Q 12.6, c� 12.6 , N 0 239.8E . 239.8E c aD E 1,682.2( U Q Page: 29 Packet Pg. 62 vchlist 04/25/2019 7:45:54AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 4.3.a Page: 30 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 236582 4/25/2019 027269 THE PART WORKS INC (Continued) 125.000.64.576.80.31.00 174.9E Total: 1,857.1 236583 4/25/2019 072649 THE WIDE FORMAT COMPANY 114884 PAPER FOR IT Paper for IT 512.000.31.518.88.31.00 155.5( 10.4% Sales Tax 512.000.31.518.88.31.00 16.1 115178 MAINTENANCE FOR HP PAGEWIDE Apr-19 Maintenance on HP PagewidE 512.000.31.518.88.48.00 175.0( 10.4% Sales Tax 512.000.31.518.88.48.00 18.2( 115197 REPLACE HEAD ON LARGE FORM) Replace head on large format printer. 001.000.62.524.10.48.00 539.7f 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.62.524.10.48.00 56.1 Total : 960.7< 236584 4/25/2019 077030 VAUDRIN, DONNA 04182019 3 DAY JURY SERVICE 3 DAY JURY SERVICE 001.000.23.512.50.49.20 36.2E Total : 36.2E 236585 4/25/2019 077036 VENTRON LLC Bus License Refund LI Refund Cst #00008387 LI Refund Cst #00008387 - Business 001.000.257.310 150.0( Tota I : 150.0( 236586 4/25/2019 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS 9828074738 C/A 671247844-00001 Cell Service-Eng 001.000.67.518.21.42.00 18.6E Cell Service Fac-Maint 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 95.8E Page: 30 Packet Pg. 63 vchlist 04/25/2019 7:45:54AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 236586 4/25/2019 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS (Continued) 236587 4/25/2019 077031 VICKERS, JOEL 04182019 236588 4/25/2019 047605 WA ST TREASURER Q1-2019 FORFEIT. 236589 4/25/2019 077032 WALL, CHRISTINE 04182019 236590 4/25/2019 067917 WALLY'S TOWING INC 62541 PO # Description/Account Cell Service-PD 001.000.41.521.22.42.00 Cell Service-PW Street/Storm 111.000.68.542.90.42.00 Cell Service-PW Street/Storm 422.000.72.531.90.42.00 Cell Service-PW Water 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 Cell Service-PW Sewer 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 Cell Service-WWTP 423.000.76.535.80.42.00 3 DAY JURY SERVICE 3 DAY JURY SERVICE 001.000.23.512.50.49.20 Total Total : Q1-2019 FORFEITURES -STATE SHf 01-2019 FORFEITURES -STATE SH/ 104.000.237.100 Total 1 DAY JURY SERVICE 04/18/2019 8: 1 DAY JURY SERVICE 04/18/2019 8: 001.000.23.512.50.49.20 Total INV 62541 EDMONDS PD CASE 19 TOW BJH2170 - LINC. NAVIGATOR 001.000.41.521.22.41.00 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.22.41.00 4.3.a Page: 31 a� L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 a m 302.8, u L 18.6E N 18.6E v 18.6E 4- m c 56.2' m c 18.6E f° 548.1( o L a E 54.7' 54.71 0 Ta 0 716.3E a 716.3E Q rn N 13.2E 13.2.' o E 189.0( aD 19.8E t U �a Q Page: 31 Packet Pg. 64 vchlist 04/25/2019 7:45:54AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 236590 4/25/2019 067917 067917 WALLY'STOWING INC 236591 4/25/2019 075283 WAVE Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice (Continued) 8136 50 211 00055035 236592 4/25/2019 075635 WCP SOLUTIONS 11147971 11154602 236593 4/25/2019 064800 WEHOP 640680 236594 4/25/2019 073137 WELCH-LANG, CAROLE 7340 FUN FACTORY 236595 4/25/2019 065535 WESTERN FACILITIES SUPPLY 026786 PO # Description/Account Total : FIBER HIGH SPEED INTERNET SEF High Speed Internet service 05/01/19 512.000.31.518.87.42.00 Total PM: SUPPLIES: TOILET PAPER DISI PM: SUPPLIES: TOILET PAPER DISI 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 PM: SUPPLIES: CAN LINERS PM: SUPPLIES: CAN LINERS 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 Total FLOWER PROGRAM: PLANTS FLOWER PROGRAM: PLANTS 125.000.64.576.80.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 125.000.64.576.80.31.00 Total 7340 FUN FACTORY INSTRUCTION 7340 FUN FACTORY INSTRUCTION 001.000.64.571.22.41.00 Total INV 0268786 CUST 0701480 EDMOP #68 BLACK CAN LINERS 001.000.41.521.70.31.00 FUEL SURCHARGE 001.000.41.521.70.31.00 4.3.a Page: 32 a� L 3 c �a Amoun y 0 208.8! U d L_ 816.0( 816.0( m 150.4( m c 15.61 -a c �a 1,012.0( �a a 105.2.E 1,283.25 .� 0 600.3E > 0 a 62.4E Q- 662.7' Q rn N 632.7( o 632.7( E 2 U 156.3, (D E t 4.0( u Q Page: 32 Packet Pg. 65 vchlist 04/25/2019 7:45:54AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 236595 4/25/2019 065535 WESTERN FACILITIES SUPPLY 236596 4/25/2019 064008 WETLANDS & WOODLANDS 236597 4/25/2019 063008 WSDOT 105 Vouchers for bank code : usbank 105 Vouchers in this report Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.70.31.00 Tota I : 26975 PM: FLOWER PROGRAM PLANTS PM: FLOWER PROGRAM PLANTS 125.000.64.576.80.31.00 7.8% Sales Tax 125.000.64.576.80.31.00 Total RE 41 JZ0249 L005 E7JA.PROJECT COSTS FOR MARC E7JA.Project Costs for March 2019 421.000.74.594.34.65.41 Total Bank total Total vouchers 4.3.a Page: 33 aD L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 a m 16.61 u 176.95 •`- 13 N m 1,144.0( r 89.2' 1,233Z c �a 592.1- 592.11 a 747,949.4' E 747,949.4' ,- 0 Ta 0 L Q Q Q r N O N E 2 V a 4) E t V f6 Q Page: 33 Packet Pg. 66 vchlist Voucher List Page 05/02/2019 9:10:44AM City of Edmonds Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account 236598 5/1/2019 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 203097787 WWTP: 3/20-4/16/19 METER 10001� 3/20-4/16/19 200 2ND AVE S / METE 423.000.76.535.80.47.61 Total 236599 5/2/2019 065052 AARD PEST CONTROL 20425 PM & SENIOR CENTER PEST CONI PM & SENIOR CENTER PEST CONI 001.000.64.576.80.41.00 Total 236600 5/2/2019 061029 ABSOLUTE GRAPHIX 419301 P&R WINTER ADULT LEAGUE SHIR P&R WINTER ADULT LEAGUE SHIR 001.000.64.571.25.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.64.571.25.31.00 Total 236601 5/2/2019 065568 ALLWATER INC 041919007 FINANCE DEPT WATER Finance dept water 001.000.31.514.23.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.31.514.23.31.00 Tota I : 236602 5/2/2019 063862 ALPINE PRODUCTS INC TM-184371 TRAFFIC - YELLOW ,WHITE TRAFF Traffic - Yellow ,White Traffic Paint, 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 Freight 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 Tota I : 236603 5/2/2019 076987 ANG, HUAY SIN 7348 ART CLASS 7348 PRESCHOOL ART CLASS INS- 7348 PRESCHOOL ART CLASS INS Page: 1 Packet Pg. 67 vchlist 05/02/2019 9:10:44AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 236603 5/2/2019 076987 ANG, HUAY SIN 236604 5/2/2019 073573 ANIXTER 236605 5/2/2019 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) 001.000.64.571.22.41.00 23K219507 CITY HALL - LOCK City Hall - Lock 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 1991199345 1991209438 Total : Total ; FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS & MAT FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS 511.000.77.548.68.24.00 FLEET DIVISION MATS 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 10.4% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.24.00 10.4% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 PUBLIC WORKS CIVIC LOBBY MATE PUBLIC WORKS CIVIC LOBBY MATE 001.000.65.518.20.41.00 PUBLIC WORKS CIVIC LOBBY MATE 111.000.68.542.90.41.00 PUBLIC WORKS CIVIC LOBBY MATE 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 PUBLIC WORKS CIVIC LOBBY MATE 422.000.72.531.90.41.00 PUBLIC WORKS CIVIC LOBBY MATE 423.000.75.535.80.41.00 PUBLIC WORKS CIVIC LOBBY MATE 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.65.518.20.41.00 10.4% Sales Tax 4.3.b Page: 2 Page: 2 Packet Pg. 68 vchlist 05/02/2019 9:10:44AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 4.3.b Page: 3 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account a� L 3 c �a Amoun y 236605 5/2/2019 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES (Continued) 0 111.000.68.542.90.41.00 as 0.6z -0 10.4% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 m 0.6z .L 10.4% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.41.00 0.6z Y 10.4% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.41.00 t 0.6z u 10.4% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 0.6' c 1991209439 FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS & MAT FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS 511.000.77.548.68.24.00 9.2� FLEET DIVISION MATS 0 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 19.1( >% 10.4% Sales Tax a 511.000.77.548.68.24.00 0.9, 10.4% Sales Tax ca 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 1.9£ U 1991213751 PARKS MAINT UNIFORM SERVICE 0 PARKS MAINT UNIFORM SERVICE > 001.000.64.576.80.24.00 52.0� o 10.4% Sales Tax a 001.000.64.576.80.24.00 5.4, Q Total: 155.6E c, T- 236606 5/2/2019 072576 ARTACCESS 15271 EAC LIBRARY LISTING JULY-DECEI c EAC LIBRARY LISTING JULY-DECEI c 117.100.64.573.20.41.40 117.0( Total : 117.0( . 236607 5/2/2019 001795 AUTOGRAPHICS 82751 PARKS & REC - STICKERS FOR SIC U Parks & Rec - Stickers for Signs 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 50.0( E 10.4% Sales Tax U 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 5.2( Q Page: 3 Packet Pg. 69 vchlist 05/02/2019 9:10:44AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 236607 5/2/2019 001795 001795 AUTOGRAPHICS 236608 5/2/2019 076923 BALING, GIEANI Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice (Continued) 4/2-4/30 GYM MONITOR 4/4-4/25 GYM MONITOR 236609 5/2/2019 012005 BALLAND GILLESPIE POLYGRAPH 2O19-42 236610 5/2/2019 002258 BENS EVER READY 17327 236611 5/2/2019 069226 BHC CONSULTANTS LLC 0010885 236612 5/2/2019 074307 BLUE STAR GAS 10385 10417 PO # Description/Account Total : 4/2-4/30/19 VOLLEYBALL GYM MON 4/2-4/30/19 VOLLEYBALL GYM MON 001.000.64.571.25.41.00 4/4-4/25/19 VOLLEYBALL GYM MON 4/4-4/25/19 VOLLEYBALL GYM MON 001.000.64.571.25.41.00 Total INV 2019-42 EDMONDS PD - 4/26/1 ADMIN ASST EXAM 001.000.41.521.10.41.00 Freight 001.000.41.521.10.41.00 Total 2019 ANNUAL FIRE EXT CITY WIDE 2019 Annual Fire Ext City Wide Svc E 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 Total PROF SERVICES THROUGH 3/22/1! Professional Services through 3/22/V 001.000.62.524.20.41.00 Total FLEET AUTO PROPANE 667 GAL Fleet Auto Propane 667 Gal 511.000.77.548.68.34.12 FLEET AUTO PROPANE 572.4 GAL Fleet Auto Propane 572.4 Gal 511.000.77.548.68.34.12 Total 4.3.b Page: 4 aD L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 55.2( 0 U d L_ 180.0( N m 144.0( v 324.0( m c d M 225.0( r- 8.0( o 233.0( ca a E U 986.0( c 102.5z > 1,088.5' a a Q rn 1,294.1( N 1,294.1( c LO 0 V) E 1,096.3E c a� 1,007.0E E 2,103.4: U Q Page: 4 Packet Pg. 70 vchlist 05/02/2019 9:10:44AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 236613 5/2/2019 069295 BROWN, CANDY 236614 5/2/2019 073029 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account 4/23-4/24 VISIT 4/23-4/24/19 BIRD NATURALIST CLI 4/23-4/24/19 BIRD NATURALIST CLf 001.000.64.571.23.41.00 Total 19988534 FLEET COPIER Fleet Copier 511.000.77.548.68.45.00 10.4% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.45.00 19988538 WATER SEWER COPIER Water Sewer Copier 421.000.74.534.80.45.00 Water Sewer Copier 423.000.75.535.80.45.00 10.4% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.45.00 10.4% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.45.00 19988539 PW ADMIN COPIER PW Office Copier for 001.000.65.518.20.45.00 PW Office Copier for 111.000.68.542.90.45.00 PW Office Copier for 422.000.72.531.90.45.00 PW Office Copier for 421.000.74.534.80.45.00 10.4% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.45.00 10.4% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.45.00 10.4% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.45.00 10.4% Sales Tax 4.3.b Page: 5 a� L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 a m 190.4( u 190.4( N m 45.4E v 4.7' a� 78.5� 0 78.5E �a a 8.1 E 8.1; u 0 �a 86.1 ', o a a 48.8( Q rn 48.8( N 0 34.4E c 5.0E . R U 3.5f aD 3.5E t U �a Q Page: 5 Packet Pg. 71 vchlist 05/02/2019 9:10:44AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 4.3.b Page: 6 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account a� L 3 c �a Amoun y 236614 5/2/2019 073029 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES (Continued) 0 511.000.77.548.68.45.00 as 3.5£ -0 PW Office Copier for 423.000.75.535.80.45.00 34.4E .L PW Office Copier for 511.000.77.548.68.45.00 34.4E Y 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.65.518.20.45.00 z 8.9E u 10.4% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.90.45.00 5.0£ c Total : 540.6: M 236615 5/2/2019 071816 CARLSON, JESSICA 7149 DRAWING 7149 ADVENTURES IN DRAWING IP 7149 ADVENTURES IN DRAWING IP o 001.000.64.571.22.41.00 410.9< 7158 DRAWING 7158 ADVENTURES IN DRAWING IP a 7158 ADVENTURES IN DRAWING IP 001.000.64.571.22.41.00 250.8( Total: 661 X 0 236616 5/2/2019 061773 CHAVE, ROBERT 04252019 REIMB FOR NATIONAL APA CON F E �a Reimb for National APA Conference 0 001.000.62.558.60.43.00 3,056.8� a Meals Q 001.000.62.558.60.43.00 494.0( v Total : 3,550.85 r' 236617 5/2/2019 069457 CITY OF EDMONDS E4FE.BLD20190469 E4FE.BLD20190469 FENCE PERMIT N 9 E4FE.BLD20190469. Fence Permit FE 422.000.72.594.31.65.41 95.0( E Total: 95.0( 'M z 236618 5/2/2019 069457 CITY OF EDMONDS E8CC.ENG20190019 E8CC.ENG20190019 ROW PERMIT E8CC.ENG20190019 ROW Permit 0 422.000.72.542.30.41.00 335.0( t Total: 335.0( Q Page: 6 Packet Pg. 72 vchlist 05/02/2019 9:10:44AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 4.3.b Page: 7 a� L 3 Bank code : usbank c �a Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun N 236619 5/2/2019 019215 CITY OF LYNNWOOD 15252 INV 15252 EDMONDS PD - 1 ST QTF 0 m SOCIAL WORKER - 1 ST QTR 2019 001.000.39.565.40.41.00 13,388.7.E u SOCIAL WORKER - 1 ST QTR 2019 ( L 001.000.39.565.40.41.00 35.1 LICSW SUPERVISION FOR SOC WI Y 001.000.39.565.40.41.00 52.8( z Total: 13,476.7E u 236620 5/2/2019 006200 DAILY JOURNAL OF COMMERCE 3346826 EBDC.INVITATION TO BID ADVERTI; c EBDC.Invitation to Bid Advertisement °' 125.000.68.542.30.41.00 714.0E c 3346918 EBCC.RFQ ADVERTISEMENT EBCC.RFQ Advertisement o 112.000.68.542.30.41.00 256.0< EBCC.RFQ Advertisement `0 a 126.000.68.542.30.41.00 64.0- E8CC.RFQ Advertisement 422.000.72.542.30.41.00 213.3E u Total: 1,247.4E o 236621 5/2/2019 076849 DE SANTIS, ANNE 37574 SPANISH INTERPRETER COURT 04 7a 0 SPANISH INTERPRETER COURT 04 a 001.000.23.512.50.41.01 103.8( Q Total: 103.8E .. rn 236622 5/2/2019 064531 DINES, JEANNIE 19-3928 4/23/2019 CITY COUNCIL MEETING C� 4/23/2019 CITY COUNCIL MEETING G LO 001.000.25.514.30.41.00 444.5( Total: 444.5( E 2 236623 5/2/2019 076172 DK SYSTEMS 23110 PS - REPAIRS U PS - Repairs 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 280.0( E 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 29.1 , Q Page: 7 Packet Pg. 73 vchlist 05/02/2019 9:10:44AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 236623 5/2/2019 076172 DK SYSTEMS 236624 236625 Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice (Continued) 23116 5/2/2019 070244 DUANE HARTMAN & ASSOCIATES INC 19-2886.1 5/2/2019 007253 DUNN LUMBER 6246257 6249934 �Y7iE•�7 6284036 6287241 PO # Description/Account PS - MOTOR REPLACEMENT PS - Motor Replacement 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 Prevailing Wages 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 Total EBFC.SERVICES THRU 4/21/19 EBFC.Services thru 4/21/19 422.000.72.594.31.65.41 Total CITY PARK SHOP PROJECT SUPPI City Park Shop Project Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.2% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 FAC MAINT SUPPLIES Fac Maint Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.2% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 CITY PARK SHED PROJECT - SUPP City Park Shed Project - Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.2% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 CITY PARK SHED PROJECT SUPPL City Park Shed Project Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.2% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 PS - SUPPLIES 4.3.b Page: 8 a� L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 a m U 2,564.8( m 40.0( m z 266.71 u 3,180.6E m c a� 4,142.9( 4,142.9( o 0 �a a 285.4E •� U 29.1 c Ta 0 98.6< a a Q 10.0( rn N 123.5z 0 12.6( E .ii U 15.9E E 1.6< U Q Page: 8 Packet Pg. 74 vchlist 05/02/2019 9:10:44AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 4.3.b Page: 9 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account a� L 3 c �a Amoun y 236625 5/2/2019 007253 DUNN LUMBER (Continued) 0 PS - Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 24.21 U 10.2% Sales Tax L 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 2.4E Total: 603.7: m 236626 5/2/2019 008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION 2-25150 WEST PLANTER IRRIGATION 870 C v WEST PLANTER IRRIGATION 870 C 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 51.2, 2-25175 EAST PLANTER IRRIGATION 875 Cj EAST PLANTER IRRIGATION 875 C) 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 51.2, 2-26950 LIFT STATION #3 729 NORTHSTRE/ LIFT STATION #3 729 NORTHSTRE/ o 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 104.2E a 2-28275 PLANTER IRRIGATION 1400 9TH AV PLANTER IRRIGATION 1400 9TH AV 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 51.2� U 2-29118 LIFT STATION #2 702 MELODY LN / o LIFT STATION #2 702 MELODY LN / 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 55.6< o 2-37180 SAM STAMM OVERLOOK / METER E L a SAM STAMM OVERLOOK / METER E Q 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 70.4� 7-05276 CEMETERY SEWER & STORM 820 CEMETERY SEWER & STORM 820 c 130.000.64.536.50.47.00 194.1 , Total : 0 578.2( E 236627 5/2/2019 047407 EMPLOYMENT SECURITY DEPT 312 000 093 ES REF # 94513310 7 M 01-19 Unemployment Claims 001.000.39.517.78.23.00 9,147.4z Q1-19 Unemployment Claims a�0i E 421.000.74.534.80.23.10 1,650.0( U Q Page: 9 Packet Pg. 75 vchlist 05/02/2019 9:10:44AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # 236627 5/2/2019 047407 047407 EMPLOYMENT SECURITY DEPT (Continued) 236628 5/2/2019 009350 EVERETT DAILY HERALD EDH851491 236629 5/2/2019 076751 FALK, NICHOLAS 236630 5/2/2019 065427 FCS GROUP 236631 5/2/2019 071998 FOSTER, KELSEY 236632 5/2/2019 011900 FRONTIER EDH852206 04222019 2964-21904014 BID-8376 253-007-4989 253-012-9166 Description/Account Total : EBDC.INVITATION TO BID ADVERTI EBDC.Invitation to Bid Advertisement 125.000.68.542.30.41.00 EBCC.RFQ ADVERTISEMENT EBCC.RFQ Advertisement 112.000.68.542.30.41.00 EBCC.RFQ Advertisement 126.000.68.542.30.41.00 EBCC.RFQ Advertisement 422.000.72.542.30.41.00 Total MILEAGE REIMB (TO SNO CO REC( Reimb for miles driven to Sno County 001.000.62.524.10.43.00 Total EBJB.SERVICES THRU 4/19/19 EBJB.Services thru 4/19/19 421.000.74.534.80.41.10 EBJB.Services thru 4/19/19 422.000.72.531.90.41.20 EBJB.Services thru 4/19/19 423.000.75.535.80.41.30 Total BID/ED! COPYWRITING FOR APRIL BID/Ed! copywriting for April 2019 140.000.61.558.70.41.00 Total SEAVIEW RESERVOIR TELEMETR) SEAVIEW RESERVOIR TELEMETR) 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINES 4.3.b Page: 10 W L 3 c �a Amoun y 0 10,797.4' 0 U d L_ 313.0, N m 106.5( 26.6' c d 88.7E 534.9, 0 �a a 42.0( 42.0( .E ca U 0 3,407.5( c a 3,407.5( Q 3,407.5( r' 10,222.5( N 0 0 600.0( 600.0( c a� E t 31.1, u Q Page: 10 Packet Pg. 76 vchlist 05/02/2019 9:10:44AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 236632 5/2/2019 011900 FRONTIER Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice (Continued) 253-012-9189 4*01 WIYiZsM 253-017-4360 425-712-8347 425-771-0158 425-771-5553 N7i>raiy�iZ1l�] 236633 5/2/2019 076932 GIRARD RESOURCES & RECYCLING 58915 59056 PO # Description/Account TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINES 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINES 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 WWTP: 4/25-5/24/19 AUTO DIALER 4/25-5/24/19 AUTO DIALER - 1 VOI 423.000.76.535.80.42.00 TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 CIVIC CENTER ELEVATOR PHONE CIVIC CENTER ELEVATOR PHONE 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 FIRE STATION #16 ALARM AND FA} FIRE STATION #16 ALARM AND FA} 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 WWTP: 4/25-5/24/19 AUTO DIALER: 4/25-5/24/19 AUTO DIALER - 1 BUS 423.000.76.535.80.42.00 LIFT STATION #2 VG SPECIAL ACC[ LIFT STATION #2 VG SPECIAL ACC[ 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 Total STORM ASPHALT DUMP FEES Storm Asphalt Dump Fees 422.000.72.531.10.49.00 STORM CONCRETE DUMPING FEE 4.3.b Page: 11 a� L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 a m 162.7- u 302.1, N m 41.5E v m c 19.81 M c 36.9( 0 L 47.0z a E 87.3E .� 0 73.2- > 0 a a 138.& Q rn 04 123.5( c LO 0 V) 26.4' . 1,090.7( c a� E 224.0( U �a Q Page: 11 Packet Pg. 77 vchlist 05/02/2019 9:10:44AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 236633 5/2/2019 076932 GIRARD RESOURCES & RECYCLING (Continued) 236635 5/2/2019 063137 GOODYEAR AUTO SERVICE CENTER 151999 PO # Description/Account Storm Concrete Dumping Fees 422.000.72.531.10.49.00 Total UNIT 796 TIRE Unit 796 Tire 511.000.77.548.68.34.30 State Tire Fee 511.000.77.548.68.34.30 10.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.34.30 Total 5/2/2019 012199 GRAINGER 9143988898 OLY BEACH RESTROOM PROJECT Oly Beach Restroom Project Supplies 125.000.64.576.80.31.00 9.8% Sales Tax 125.000.64.576.80.31.00 9143988906 OLY BEACH RESTROOM PROJECT Oly Beach Restroom Project Supplies 125.000.64.576.80.31.00 9.8% Sales Tax 125.000.64.576.80.31.00 9146587515 FAC MAINT - SUPPLIES Fac Maint - Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 9150956861 FAC MAINT - SUPPLIES Fac Maint - Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 Total: 4.3.b Page: 12 a� L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 a m 490.0( u 714.0( .L N m 94.8E 1.0( a� 9.9E 105.8, 0 �a a 137.2z E 13.4E U 4- 0 �a 12.6E p L a 1.2z Q rn 82.41 c 8.5E E 2 132.1E U c a� 13.7E E 401.5f U �a Q Page: 12 Packet Pg. 78 vchlist 05/02/2019 9:10:44AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 4.3.b Page: 13 a� L 3 Bank code : usbank c �a Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun N 236636 5/2/2019 076542 GRANICUS 112433 LEGISLATIVE MANAGEMENT - AGE 0 m LEGISLATIVE MANAGEMENT - AGE 001.000.25.514.30.48.00 1,564.9z u Total: 1,564.91 236638 5/2/2019 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 1024067 PARKS SHOP BLDG PROJECT SUP N Parks Shop Bldg Project Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 325.7E 10.0% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 32.5E 1024091 STORM - SUPPLIES (D Storm - Supplies 422.000.72.531.40.31.00 10.7E 10.0% Sales Tax o 422.000.72.531.40.31.00 1.0E 1024131 FISHING PIER - SUPPLIES ca a Fishing Pier - Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 17.5E 10.0% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 1.7E o 1065129 SEWER - SUPPLIES �a Sewer - Supplies o 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 29.9z 0- 10.0% Sales Tax Q 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 2.9E 1084224 SEWER - TRUCK SUPPLIES Sewer - Truck Supplies c 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 470.2, c 10.0% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 47.0, . 14632 PS - PROJECT SUPPLIES PS - Project Supplies }; 001.000.41.521.22.35.00 45.3" y 10.0% Sales Tax E 001.000.41.521.22.35.00 t 4.5< U 1510749 TRAFFIC - SUPPLIES Q Page: 13 Packet Pg. 79 vchlist 05/02/2019 9:10:44AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 236638 5/2/2019 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) Traffic - Supplies 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 10.0% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 1523373 PD - HD LIFT SYSTEM PD - HD Lift System 001.000.41.521.11.35.00 10.0% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.11.35.00 163005 OLYMPIC BEACH - RETURNS Olympic Beach - Returns 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.0% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 2015723 PS - PROJECT SUPPLIES PS - Project Supplies 001.000.41.521.22.35.00 10.0% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.22.35.00 22974 PS - SUPPLIES PS - Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.0% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 2621917 OLYMPIC BEACH -PROJECT SUPF Olympic Beach - Project Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.0% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 3014204 PS - SUPPLIES PS - Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.0% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 4.3.b Page: 14 W L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 a m 36.4E u L 3.6E N m t 84.9E u 8.5( c c 0 L -8.9( a E 39.7E 'ca 3.9E 0 Ta 0 L 103.4,' a Q 10.3E N 0 89.0( c 8.9( c 40.0' t 4.0( um Q Page: 14 Packet Pg. 80 vchlist 05/02/2019 9:10:44AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 236638 5/2/2019 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) 3015571 FAC MAINT UNIT 5 SUPPLIES Fac Maint Unit 5 Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.0% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 3022524 CITY PARK - STORAGE SHED LIGH City Park - Storage Shed Lights 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.0% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 3023806 BOYS & GIRLS CLUB - SUPPLIES Boys & Girls Club - Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.0% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 32380 PS - SUPPLIES PS - Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.0% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 3255003 OLYMPIC BEACH RETURNS g Olympic Beach Returns 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.0% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 3623482 FAC MAINT - SUPPLIES Fac Maint - Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.0% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 4022316 CITY HALL - SUPPLIES City Hall - Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.0% Sales Tax 4.3.b Page: 15 a� L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 a m U m 46.4E 4.6E m 651.0E m c 65.1- c �a 21.1, 0 L 2.1, a E 71.8( u 4- 0 7.1 £ > 0 L Q a -94.8( Q rn -9.4� N 0 LO 0 29.9 , E 2 3.0( U c a� 78.3z E U �a Q Page: 15 Packet Pg. 81 vchlist 05/02/2019 9:10:44AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 236638 5/2/2019 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES (Continued) 4025149 4082342 4514242 4620053 5024978 5025023 6013850 PO # Description/Account 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 TRAFFIC - RED PAINT FOR LOCATE Traffic - Red Paint for Locates 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 10.0% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 WATER - SUPPLIES Water - Supplies 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 10.0% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 ROADWAY - SUPPLIES Roadway - Supplies 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 10.0% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 OLYMPIC BEACH RANGER OFFICE Olympic Beach Ranger Office SuppliE 125.000.64.576.80.31.00 10.0% Sales Tax 125.000.64.576.80.31.00 BEACH RANGER SUPPLIES Beach Ranger Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 Parks Storage Shed Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.0% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 FAC MAINT SHOP SUPPLIES Fac Maint Shop Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.0% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 CITY PARK STORAGE BLDG - PRO, 4.3.b Page: 16 a� L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 a aD 7.8( 'D r U d L 17.9z N 1.7� v 80.5E d 8.0E �a 0 66.6( `>, M a 6.6E U 45 284.5- 0 �a 28.4E o a a Q 28.2< N 169.9z c LO 0 19.81 E 26.3E a� 2.6z E U co Q Page: 16 Packet Pg. 82 vchlist 05/02/2019 9:10:44AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 236638 5/2/2019 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) City Park Storage Bldg - Project 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.0% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 6015064 BEACH RANGER - PROJECT SUPPI Beach Ranger - Project Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.0% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 6023512 FAC MAINT - SUPPLIES Fac Maint - Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.0% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 622303 OLYMPIC BEACH - PROJECT SUPP Olympic Beach - Project Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.0% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 64776 SEWER LS 11 - SUPPLIES Sewer LS 11 - Supplies 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 10.0% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 6622944 CITY HALL - SUPPLIES City Hall - Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.0% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 7013766 FAC MAINT UNIT 5 - SUPPLIES 10.0% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 Fac Maint Unit 5 - Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 4.3.b Page: 17 aD L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 a m 72.3, u L 7.2i N m z 104.6, u 10.41 c aD M c 61.1( 0 6.1' `>+ M a E 31.7' 'ca 3.11 0 7a 0 L 14.9E a Q 1.5( rn N 0 36.4, c 3.6E c 3.4f t 34.7E Q Page: 17 Packet Pg. 83 vchlist 05/02/2019 9:10:44AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 236638 5/2/2019 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) 7026225 FLEET - SUPPLIES Fleet - Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.0% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 7086265 PW - SUPPLIES PW - Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.0% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 7624591 PW - SUPPLIES PW - Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.0% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 8032494 CITY PARK - SUPPLIES City Park - Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 FAC - Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 Fac Maint Unit 5 - Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.0% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 8074745 FAC MAINT UNIT 42 - SUPPLIES Fac Maint Unit 42 - Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.0% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 8419922 MCH - BLINDS MCH - Blinds 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 4.3.b Page: 18 a� L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 a m U m 19.9' 1.9( m 45.4( m c 4.5z c �a 44.9, 0 L 4.4� a E 39.91 u 0 3.8z > 0 L 42.8< a Q 8.6E N 0 36.1E c 3.6' c 230.0E E s 23.6E L) Q Page: 18 Packet Pg. 84 vchlist 05/02/2019 9:10:44AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 236638 5/2/2019 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) 9023070 PS - SUPPLIES PS - Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.0% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 9023137 BEACH RANGER STATION - SUPPL Beach Ranger Station - Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.0% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 9023138 PS - PROJECT PARTS PS - Project Parts 001.000.41.521.23.35.00 10.0% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.23.35.00 9024368 BEACH RANGERS PROJECT SUPP Beach Rangers Project Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.0% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 9025915 FAC MAINT SHOP SUPPLIES Fac Maint Shop Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.0% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 9042080 FAC MAINT - CITY WIDE - SUPPLIE; Fac Maint - City Wide - Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.0% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 9060331 FAC MAINT - CITY WIDE SUPPLIES Fac Maint - City Wide Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.0% Sales Tax 4.3.b Page: 19 a� L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 a m U m 33.7z 3.3-, Y m 38.1- c 3.8- c �a 23.6z o L 2.3E m E 43.3E u 4- 0 4.3z > 0 L Q a 249.2z Q rn 24.9, N 0 0 549.0( 2 54.9( U c a� 33.6E E U �a Q Page: 19 Packet Pg. 85 vchlist 05/02/2019 9:10:44AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 236638 5/2/2019 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES (Continued) 9084437 9253958 9615700 9622487 236639 5/2/2019 061013 HONEY BUCKET 0551036840 0551039023 0551039024 0551039025 PO # Description/Account 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 STORM - SUPPLIES FOR 240TH PL Storm - Supplies for 240th PL 422.000.72.531.40.31.00 10.0% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.40.31.00 PS - RETURNS PS - Returns 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.0% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 SEWER - LK BALLINGER KING CO Sewer - Lk Ballinger King Co Sewer 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 10.0% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 CITY HALL - SUPPLIES City Hall - Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.0% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 Total SEAVIEW PARK HONEY BUCKET SEAVIEW PARK HONEY BUCKET 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 HICKMAN PARK HONEY BUCKET HICKMAN PARK HONEY BUCKET 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 YOST PARK POOL HONEY BUCKET YOST PARK POOL HONEY BUCKET 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 HAINES WHARF PARK HONEY BUC HAINES WHARF PARK HONEY BUC 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 4.3.b Page: 20 aD L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 a m 3.3-, 'D U m 27.51 13 N 2.7E 33.7� c aD M �a 0 295.& `>, M a 29.5E U 45 54.8' 0 �a 5.4E o 5,299.1 ( a Q rn 111.6E c LO 0 V) 607.6, E U 309.2- y E t U 234.8E Q Page: 20 Packet Pg. 86 vchlist 05/02/2019 9:10:44AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 236639 5/2/2019 061013 HONEY BUCKET 236640 5/2/2019 073548 INDOFF INCORPORATED Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) 0551039026 PINE STREET PARK HONEY BUCKE PINE STREET PARK HONEY BUCKE 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 0551039027 SIERRA PARK HONEY BUCKET SIERRA PARK HONEY BUCKET 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 0551039028 WILLOW CREEK FISH HATCHERY I WILLOW CREEK FISH HATCHERY I 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 0551039029 CIVIC FIELD 6TH & BELL HONEY Bl CIVIC FIELD 6TH & BELL HONEY B( 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 0551039030 MARINA BEACH/DOG PARK HONED MARINA BEACH/DOG PARK HONED 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 0551039031 CIVIC CENTER PLAYFIELD HONEY CIVIC CENTER PLAYFIELD HONEY 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 0551039032 CIVIC FIELD 6TH & EDMONDS HON CIVIC FIELD 6TH & EDMONDS HON 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 0551039034 MAPLEWOOD PARK HONEY BUCKI MAPLEWOOD PARK HONEY BUCK[ 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 Total 3229948 CHAIR FOR M CAIN Chair, monitor risers for M Cain 001.000.31.514.23.35.00 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.31.514.23.35.00 3237728 AA BATTERIES Duracell AA Batties - 24 pk 001.000.31.514.23.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 4.3.b Page: 21 aD L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 a m U m 113.8E N 113.8E 215.0E c aD M 113.8E 0 L 1,394.2< a E 113.8E u 4- 0 �a 113.8E o a a Q 175.0( rn 3,616.8E N 0 0 524.8E E 2 54.0E c aD E 30.3f Q Page: 21 Packet Pg. 87 vchlist 05/02/2019 9:10:44AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 4.3.b Page: 22 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account a� L 3 c �a Amoun y 236640 5/2/2019 073548 INDOFF INCORPORATED (Continued) 0 001.000.31.514.23.31.00 as 3.1 E -0 3239525 P&R SUPPLIES: COPY PAPER P&R SUPPLIES: COPY PAPER L 001.000.64.571.22.31.00 79.9E 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.64.571.22.31.00 8.3, 3239595 POST IT NOTE PADS Post it note pads 001.000.31.514.23.31.00 18.9E 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.31.514.23.31.00 1.9 Total: 721.6f sa 236641 5/2/2019 069851 JACKYE'S JACKETS 11861 STREET / STORM WORK WEAR PE 0 Street / Storm Work Wear personalizi a 422.000.72.531.90.24.00 616.8' Street / Storm Work Wear personalizi 111.000.68.542.90.24.00 616.8� u 10.4% Sales Tax o 422.000.72.531.90.24.00 64.1 f Ta 10.4% Sales Tax o L 111.000.68.542.90.24.00 64.1E a Total: 1,361.9° Q 236642 5/2/2019 075769 MAILFINANCE INC N7695644 POSTAGE MACHINE LEASE 2/23/2a °- POSTAGE MACHINE LEASE 02/23/2 c 001.000.25.514.30.45.00 1,542.6( LO 10.4% Sales Tax c 001.000.25.514.30.45.00 160.4' E Total: 1,703.0: 2 236643 5/2/2019 075716 MALLORY PAINT STORE INC E0106951 CITY PARK SHED PROJECT SUPPL City Park Shed Project Supplies E 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 398.9' Sales Tax Q Page: 22 Packet Pg. 88 vchlist 05/02/2019 9:10:44AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account 236643 5/2/2019 075716 MALLORY PAINT STORE INC (Continued) 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 Tota I : 236644 5/2/2019 072136 MANAGERPLUS SOLUTIONS LLC 425-771-02336/2/2019 FLEET - SOFTWARE SUPPORT 6/3/ FLEET - SOFTWARE SUPPORT 6/3/ 511.000.77.548.68.49.00 10.4% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.49.00 Total 236645 5/2/2019 072223 MILLER, DOUG 4/3-4/24 GYM MON ITO 4/3-4/24/19 BASKETBALL GYM MON 4/3-4/24/19 BASKETBALL GYM MON 001.000.64.571.25.41.00 Total 236646 5/2/2019 020900 MILLERS EQUIP & RENT ALL INC 301893 STREET - SUPPLIES Street - Supplies 111.000.68.542.71.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.71.31.00 Total 236647 5/2/2019 064570 NATIONAL SAFETY INC 0539138-IN STORM - WORK EAR PLUGS Storm - Work Ear Plugs 422.000.72.531.90.24.00 10.4% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.24.00 Tota I : 236648 5/2/2019 024001 NC MACHINERY S2850501 UNIT E166WQ 2019 CATERPILLER Unit E166WQ 2019 Caterpiller Mini 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 10.4% Sales Tax 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 Tota I : 4.3.b Page: 23 aD L 3 c �a Amoun y 0 a aD 39.8� -0 438.8: m L_ N 1,918.8( y t U 199.5E 2,118.3E c c �a 120.0( — 120.0( �a a E 87.7E 4- 0 9.1< 70 96.W c 0 Q a Q 133.0( cn r. 13.81 c 146.8' o E 2 U 129,782.3z aD 13,497.3E E 143,279.7( um Q Page: 23 Packet Pg. 89 vchlist 05/02/2019 9:10:44AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 236649 5/2/2019 024302 NELSON PETROLEUM Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice 0692447-I N 0693014-IN 236650 5/2/2019 074866 NORTHWEST PLAYGROUND EQUIPMEN 44059 236651 5/2/2019 064215 NORTHWEST PUMP & EQUIP CO 2962602-00 2985532-00 PO # Description/Account FLEET FILTER INVENTORY Fleet Filter Inventory 511.000.77.548.68.34.40 10.4% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.34.40 FLEET FILTER INVENTORY Fleet Filter Inventory 511.000.77.548.68.34.40 10.4% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.34.40 Total ; REMAINING BALANCE -BENCHES A REMAINING BALANCE -BENCHES A 127.000.64.575.50.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 127.000.64.575.50.31.00 Total FLEET SHOP REPAIRS AND PARTS Fleet Shop Repairs and Parts with 511.000.77.548.68.49.00 10.3% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.49.00 FLEET SHOP SPILL CONTAINER & I FLEET SHOP Spill Container & Parts 511.000.77.548.68.49.00 10.3% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.49.00 Total 236652 5/2/2019 025690 NOYES, KARIN 000 00 908 PLANNING BOARD MINUTES Planning Board Minutes (4/29/19) 001.000.62.558.60.41.00 Total 4.3.b Page: 24 a� L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 o_ m 22.6< u L 2.3E N m z 20.2' u 2.1( c 47.25 c �a 0 3,520.7E �a a 366.1E 3,886.9( 0 �a 494.5, p L a 50.9< Q rn 550.8( c LO 56.7' N 1,152.9F E .ii U c 425.5( E 425.5( �a Q Page: 24 Packet Pg. 90 vchlist 05/02/2019 9:10:44AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 236653 5/2/2019 065720 OFFICE DEPOT 236654 236655 236656 Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice 301101119001 301101119002 KZ�ii[IYZ:Z�Pi 5/2/2019 077041 ON TARGET SOLUTIONS GROUP INC 1388 5/2/2019 008475 PETTY CASH 042919 5/2/2019 071811 PONY MAIL BOX & BUSINESS CTR 1115354 PO # Description/Account PW OFFICE SUPPLIES PW Office Supplies 001.000.65.518.20.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.65.518.20.31.00 PW OFFICE SUPPLIES PW Office Supplies 001.000.65.518.20.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.65.518.20.31.00 PW OFFICE SUPPLIES PW Office Supplies 001.000.65.518.20.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.65.518.20.31.00 Total INV 1388 - EDMONDS PD - LEADER LEADERSHIP FOR LE - GOVANATE; 001.000.41.521.40.49.00 Total PW SUPPLIES PW Supplies 001.000.65.518.20.31.00 Water CDL Renewal - J Kobylk 421.000.74.534.80.49.00 Sewer Truck Supplies 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 Sewer TV Trcuk Supplies 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 Sewer Work Jeans Replaced - D Led 423.000.75.535.80.24.00 Total WATER - POLLARD RETURN MAIL I 4.3.b Page: 25 a� L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 o_ m 18.9E u L 1.9E N v m 10.3z v 1.0f c a� c 18.1f 0 1.8f >+ M 52.4° m E U 150.0( o 150.0( �a 0 L a a Q 29.9E rn 102.0( c 19.8E N E 5.5( R U 42.4E y 199.8( E t U �a Q Page: 25 Packet Pg. 91 vchlist 05/02/2019 9:10:44AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 236656 5/2/2019 071811 PONY MAIL BOX & BUSINESS CTR 236657 5/2/2019 046900 PUGET SOUND ENERGY Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) Water - Pollard Return Mail Fees 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 Tota I : 200000704821 FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER 70( FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER 70( 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 200002411383 YOST PARK/POOL 9535 BOWDOIN YOST PARK/POOL 9535 BOWDOIN 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 200007876143 OLD PUBLIC WORKS 200 DAYTON OLD PUBLIC WORKS 200 DAYTON 421.000.74.534.80.47.00 200009595790 FIRE STATION #16 8429 196TH ST FIRE STATION #16 8429 196TH ST ; 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 200011439656 FIRE STATION #20 23009 88TH AVE FIRE STATION #20 23009 88TH AVE 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 200016558856 CIVIC CENTER 250 5TH AVE N / ME CIVIC CENTER 250 5TH AVE N / ME 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 200016815843 FIRE STATION #17 275 6TH AVE N / FIRE STATION #17 275 6TH AVE N / 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 200017676343 FLEET MAINTENANCE BAY 21105 7 FLEET MAINTENANCE BAY 21105 7 511.000.77.548.68.47.00 200019375639 MEADOWDALE CLUBHOUSE 6801 MEADOWDALE CLUBHOUSE 6801 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 200019895354 SNO-ISLE LIBRARY 650 MAIN ST / IN SNO-ISLE LIBRARY 650 MAIN ST / 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 200020415911 PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH 4.3.b Page: 26 a� L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 a m 24.9z u 24.9' •L N m 1,122.5" v m c 157.7( c �a 184.0( o �a a 481.6" U 126.0' o �a 0 L 145.0z m Q rn 513.6, N 0 258.7, N E 2 125.0 , c a� E 118.8E U �a Q Page: 26 Packet Pg. 92 vchlist 05/02/2019 9:10:44AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 4.3.b Page: 27 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account a� L 3 c �a Amoun y 236657 5/2/2019 046900 PUGET SOUND ENERGY (Continued) 0 PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ; 001.000.65.518.20.47.00 18.6( u PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ; L 111.000.68.542.90.47.00 70.7E PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ; Y 421.000.74.534.80.47.00 70.7E PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ; v 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 70.7E PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ; c 511.000.77.548.68.47.00 70.7E m PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ; 422.000.72.531.90.47.00 70.71 f° 200021829581 WWTP: 3/21-4/22/19 METER 00039( o 3/21-4/22/19 200 2ND AVE S / METE `>+ 423.000.76.535.80.47.63 �a 42.9, 200024711901 CITY PARK BUILDING 600 3RD AVE CITY PARK BUILDING 600 3RD AVE ca 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 220.4E ,u Total: 3,869.1; 0 7a 236658 5/2/2019 062657 REGIONAL DISPOSAL COMPANY 0000052629 STORM - STREET SWEEPING DUM o L Storm - Street Sweeping Dump Fees a 422.000.72.531.10.49.00 7,512.0( Q Total : 7,512.0( 236659 5/2/2019 064769 ROMAINE ELECTRIC 5-022517 UNIT 104 - BATTERY N 0 Unit 104 - Battery LO 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 96.2( N 10.4% Sales Tax E 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 10.0" R Total: 106Z U c 236660 5/2/2019 067802 SAN DIEGO POLICE EQUIP CO 637195 INV 637195 CUST 1733 - EDMONDS E 9 CASES FED 12 GA SLUGS 001.000.41.521.40.31.00 1,180.8E Q Page: 27 Packet Pg. 93 vchlist 05/02/2019 9:10:44AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 4.3.b Page: 28 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account a� L 3 c �a Amoun y 236660 5/2/2019 067802 SAN DIEGO POLICE EQUIP CO (Continued) 0 m 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.40.31.00 122.8- u Total: 1,303.7( 236661 5/2/2019 067076 SEATTLE PUMP AND EQUIPMENT CO 203552-1 PM: SUCTION FLANGE, FLAPPER C N PM: SUCTION FLANGE, FLAPPER C 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 95.3( r 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 9.9- Total : 105.21 236662 5/2/2019 070495 SEPULVEDA, PABLO 36561 SPANISH INTERPRETER COURT 04 SPANISH INTERPRETER COURT 04 — 001.000.23.512.50.41.01 105.3z L, Total: 105.3z m CL 236663 5/2/2019 068489 SIRENNET.COM 0238415-IN UNIT E155PO - ARROW E Unit E155PO - Arrow fd U 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 1,458.0( o 10.4% Sales Tax 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 M 151.6< o Total: 1,609.6: a a 236664 5/2/2019 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 200386456 CLUBHOUSE 6801 MEADOWDALE Q CLUBHOUSE 6801 MEADOWDALE c� 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 66.2- N 200422418 FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER 70( G FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER 70( o 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 1,245.6( 200468593 LIFT STATION #4 8311 TALBOT RD / M LIFT STATION #4 8311 TALBOT RD / z 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 241.1 c 200748606 TRAFFIC LIGHT 9730 220TH ST SW TRAFFIC LIGHT 9730 220TH ST SW E 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 17.7z Q Page: 28 Packet Pg. 94 vchlist 05/02/2019 9:10:44AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 236664 5/2/2019 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) 201265980 LIFT STATION #12 16121 75TH PL � LIFT STATION #12 16121 75TH PL � 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 201374964 LIFT STATION #11 6811 1/2 157TH P LIFT STATION #11 6811 1/2 157TH P 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 201582152 TRAFFIC LIGHT 19600 80TH AVE W TRAFFIC LIGHT 19600 80TH AVE W 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 201594488 LIFT STATION #15 7710 168TH PL S LIFT STATION #15 7710 168TH PL S 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 201611951 TRAFFIC LIGHT 20801 76TH AVE W TRAFFIC LIGHT 20801 76TH AVE W 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 201656907 DECORATIVE LIGHTING 413 MAIN DECORATIVE LIGHTING 413 MAIN 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 201762101 415 5TH AVE S 415 5TH AVE S 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 201782646 TRAFFIC LIGHT 901 WALNUT ST / � TRAFFIC LIGHT 901 WALNUT ST / � 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 201907862 TRAFFIC LIGHT 7133 212TH ST SW TRAFFIC LIGHT 7133 212TH ST SW 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 202087870 LIFT STATION #6 100 PINE ST / MEl LIFT STATION #6 100 PINE ST / MEl 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 202289120 TRAFFIC LIGHT 23801 HWY 99 / ME TRAFFIC LIGHT 23801 HWY 99 / ME 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 202421582 LOG CABIN & DECORATIVE LIGHTI LOG CABIN & DECORATIVE LIGHTI 4.3.b Page: 29 a� L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 a m U m 162.6" N 21.0, 31.8( 17.2 - 0 L 30.4z a E 113.4' u 0 �a 20.1 � 0 a a Q 18.3, N 0 28.5" c V) E 154.5z u c aD 53.2z E t U co Q Page: 29 Packet Pg. 95 vchlist 05/02/2019 9:10:44AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 4.3.b Page: 30 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account a� L 3 c �a Amoun y 236664 5/2/2019 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 (Continued) 0 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 as 125.5( -0 202620415 MATHAY BALLINGER PARK IRRIGA MATHAY BALLINGER PARK IRRIGA L 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 16.0< 204292213 CHARGE STATION #1 552 MAIN ST CHARGE STATION #1 552 MAIN ST d 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 61.3" U Total : 2,424.9: V m 236665 5/2/2019 037800 SNOHOMISH HEALTH DISTRICT IN0041124 SPRAY PARK PERMIT ACCT AR000( c SPRAY PARK PERMIT ACCT AR000( 001.000.64.576.80.49.00 470.0( IN0041221 YOST POOL PERMIT ACCT AR0004! YOST POOL PERMIT ACCT AR0004! o 001.000.64.576.80.49.00 760.0( a Total : 1,230.0( 236666 5/2/2019 038100 SNO-KING STAMP 65321 FLEET STAMPS Fleet Stamps c 001.000.65.518.20.31.00 69.6" -ii Freight > 0 001.000.65.518.20.31.00 3.7E a 10.4% Sales Tax Q 001.000.65.518.20.31.00 65357 FLEET STAMP r' Fleet Stamp c 001.000.65.518.20.31.00 34.8" Freight 001.000.65.518.20.31.00 3.5( E 10.4% Sales Tax 2 001.000.65.518.20.31.00 3.9E Total: 123.2f a� t 236667 5/2/2019 038410 SOUND SAFETY PRODUCTS 67721/4 SEWER - WORK JEANS 2 T HARRI: Sewer - Work Jeans 2 T Harris Q Page: 30 Packet Pg. 96 vchlist 05/02/2019 9:10:44AM Bank code : usbank Voucher List City of Edmonds Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account 236667 5/2/2019 038410 SOUND SAFETY PRODUCTS (Continued) 423.000.75.535.80.24.00 10.3% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.24.00 70307/4 SEWER - EXCHANGE DIFFERENCE Sewer - Exchange difference 423.000.75.535.80.24.00 10.4% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.24.00 K63924/1 STORM WORK WEAR Storm Work Wear 422.000.72.531.90.24.00 9.7% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.24.00 Tota I : 236668 5/2/2019 040430 STONEWAY ELECTRIC SUPPLY S102717693.001 PW - SUPPLIES PW - Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 Tota I : 236669 5/2/2019 076474 STROMME, JOANNE 7253 YOGA 7253 YOGA INSTRUCTION 7253 YOGA INSTRUCTION 001.000.64.571.27.41.00 7256 7250 YOGA 7256 7250 YOGA INSTRUCTION 7256 YOGA INSTRUCTION 001.000.64.571.27.41.00 7250 YOGA CLASS INSTRUCTION 001.000.64.571.27.41.00 Tota I : 236670 5/2/2019 065578 SYSTEMS INTERFACE INC 23659 WATER / SEWER - TELEMETRY MC Water / Sewer - Telemetry Modems 421.000.74.534.80.35.00 4.3.b Page: 31 aD L 3 c �a Amoun y 0 a aD 59.0( 'D r U d 6.0£ N -3.7< m c a� 43.9� �a 4.2, 0 109.2, `5% M a E 127.M U 4- 0 13.3z 140.4: o L Q Q Q 673.2( r' N O 701.2E N E 470.8( R 1,845.2E c aD E t U 674.1 z Q Page: 31 Packet Pg. 97 vchlist 05/02/2019 9:10:44AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 4.3.b Page: 32 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account a� L 3 c �a Amoun y 236670 5/2/2019 065578 SYSTEMS INTERFACE INC (Continued) 0 m Water / Sewer - Telemetry Modems 423.000.75.535.80.35.00 674.1 < u 10.4% Sales Tax L 421.000.74.534.80.35.00 70.1- 10.4% Sales Tax Y 423.000.75.535.80.35.00 70.1 Total: 1,488.45 u 236671 5/2/2019 040917 TACOMA SCREW PRODUCTS INC 18236269 ROADWAY - SUPPLIES c Roadway - Supplies (D 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 321.3- -a 10.4% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 33.4, o 18237879 ROADWAY - SUPPLIES Roadway - Supplies a 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 118.4E 10.4% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 12.3, u Total: 485.5: o 236672 5/2/2019 073621 TANIMURA, NAOAKI 7285 7286 KENDO 7285 7286 KENDO CLASS INSTRUC Ta 0 7285 KENDO CLASS INSTRUCTION a 001.000.64.571.27.41.00 181.4� Q 7286 KENDO CLASS INSTRUCTION 001.000.64.571.27.41.00 1,150.4- 7287 KENDO CLASS 7287 KENDO CLASS INSTRUCTION c 7287 KENDO CLASS INSTRUCTION 001.000.64.571.27.41.00 277.5( N Total : 1,609.4( E .ii 236673 5/2/2019 071666 TETRATECH INC 51431859 EBCC.SERVICES THRU 3/31/19 U EBCC.Services thru 3/31/19 c 112.000.68.542.30.41.00 21,144.1( E EBCC.Services thru 3/31/19 U 126.000.68.542.30.41.00 5,286.0' +° Q Page: 32 Packet Pg. 98 vchlist 05/02/2019 9:10:44AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 4.3.b Page: 33 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 236673 5/2/2019 071666 TETRATECH INC (Continued) EBCC.Services thru 3/31/19 422.000.72.542.30.41.00 11,076.11 Total: 37,506.3( 236674 5/2/2019 074942 THE MURAL WORKS INC 1915 PAINT MISSION STATEMENT ON W) PAINT MISSION STATEMENT ON Wj 001.000.23.512.50.41.00 1,050.0( 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.23.512.50.41.00 109.2( Total : 1,159.2( 236675 5/2/2019 027269 THE PART WORKS INC INV41207 PLAZA RM - SUPPLIES Plaza Rm - Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 294.6, Freight 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 8.2 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 31.5( Total : 334.35 236676 5/2/2019 070744 TIGER OAK MEDIA 2019-210779 BUSINESS RECRUITMENT ADS SE) Business recruitment ads Seattle 001.000.61.558.70.41.40 1,750.0( Total : 1,750.0( 236677 5/2/2019 063939 TYLER TECHNOLOGIES INC 045-252599 INV 045-252599 COLLINS - NEW W( COLLINS - TYLER NEW WORLD CC 001.000.41.521.40.49.00 950.0( Tota I : 950.0( 236678 5/2/2019 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS 9828696198 C/A 571242650-0001 iPhone/iPad Cell Service Bld Dept 001.000.62.524.20.35.00 463.2z iPhone/iPad Cell Service Bld Dept 001.000.62.524.20.42.00 561.9z Page: 33 Packet Pg. 99 vchlist 05/02/2019 9:10:44AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 236678 5/2/2019 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) iPhone/iPad Cell Service City Clerk 001.000.25.514.30.42.00 iPhone/iPad Cell Service Econ 001.000.61.557.20.42.00 iPad Cell Service Council 001.000.11.511.60.42.00 iPhone/iPad Cell Service Court 001.000.23.512.50.42.00 iPhone/iPad Cell Service Developmer 001.000.62.524.10.42.00 iPhone/iPad Cell Service Engineering 001.000.67.518.21.42.00 iPhone/iPad Cell Service Facilities 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 iPhone/iPad Cell Service Finance 001.000.31.514.23.42.00 iPhone/iPad Cell Service HR 001.000.22.518.10.42.00 iPhone/iPad Cell Service IS 512.000.31.518.88.42.00 iPhone/iPad Cell Service Mayor's Offi 001.000.21.513.10.42.00 iPhone/iPad Cell Service Parks Dept 001.000.64.571.21.42.00 iPhone/iPad Cell Service Police Dept 001.000.41.521.22.42.00 Air cards Police Dept 001.000.41.521.22.42.00 iPhone/iPad Cell Service Planning DE 001.000.62.558.60.42.00 iPhone/iPad Cell Service PW Admin 001.000.65.518.20.42.00 iPhone/iPad Cell Service PW Admin 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 4.3.b Page: 34 aD L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 a m 75.8E u L 96.1E N 558.6E U 75.8E Im- (D c 152.3 , m c 1,261.1 E f° 0 L 244.4( a 106.1E 96.1 � ,- 0 384.4< > 0 57.7, a Q 56.1 £ 0 N 1,926.4E 9 0 1,080.2, E 120.0< c 26.5E t U 7.5� a Q Page: 34 Packet Pg. 100 vchlist 05/02/2019 9:10:44AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 236678 5/2/2019 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) iPhone/iPad Cell Service PW Admin 422.000.72.531.90.42.00 iPhone/iPad Cell Service PW Admin 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 iPhone/iPad Cell Service PW Admin 423.000.76.535.80.42.00 iPhone/iPad Cell Service PW Street C 111.000.68.542.90.42.00 iPhone/iPad Cell Service PW Fleet 511.000.77.548.68.42.00 iPhone/iPad Cell Service PW Water/,r 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 iPhone/iPad Cell Service PW Water/,r 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 iPhone/iPad Cell Service Sewer Dept 423.000.75.535.80.35.00 iPhone/iPad Cell Service Sewer Dept 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 iPhone/iPad Cell Service Water 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 iPad Cell Service Storm 422.000.72.531.90.42.00 iPad Cell Service Street/Storm 111.000.68.542.90.42.00 iPad Cell Service Street/Storm 422.000.72.531.90.42.00 iPhone/iPad Cell Service WWTP 423.000.76.535.80.42.00 iPhone/iPad Cell Service Parks 001.000.64.576.80.42.00 iPhone/iPad Cell Service Parks 001.000.64.571.21.42.00 iPad Cell Service Parks Discovery 001.000.64.571.23.42.00 4.3.b Page: 35 a� L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 a m 26.5E u L 7.5< 'a N 7.5E v 228.2< m c 56.1 £ m c 164.2E f° 0 L 164.2E a 287.0< E 329.8E ,- 0 384M > 0 L 155.8E a Q 200.0E 0) N 200.0E 9 0 637.2E E M 152.3 , c 96.1E t 40.0- Q Page: 35 Packet Pg. 101 vchlist 05/02/2019 9:10:44AM Bank code : usbank Voucher List City of Edmonds Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 236678 5/2/2019 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS (Continued) 9828826021 236679 5/2/2019 073832 WA ST DEPT OF ENTERPRISE SVCS 73186219 236680 5/2/2019 075635 WCP SOLUTIONS 11011909 CR 11115613 CR 11167278 11169204 11173416 PO # Description/Account C/A 772540262-00001 Lift Station access 512.000.31.518.88.42.00 Total : INV 73186219 EDMONDS PD - SILH 4,000 SILHOUETTE TARGETS 001.000.41.521.40.31.00 Freight 001.000.41.521.40.31.00 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.40.31.00 Total FAC MAINT RETURNS Fac Maint Returns 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 FAC MAINT RETURNS Fac Maint Returns 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 FAC MAINT - SUPPLIES Fac Maint - Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 FAC MAINT SUPPLIES Fac Maint Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 FAC MAINT SUPPLIES 4.3.b Page: 36 a� L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 a m U m 54.6( .L 10,543.45 N m 1,038.0( m c 126.2E � 119.91 1,284.1f o 0 �a a -64.7E •� U -6.61 c �a 0 -218.4( a a Q -22.5( rn N 0 340.0( 0 35.3E E U 2,051.81 r- E 213.3� U Q Page: 36 Packet Pg. 102 vchlist 05/02/2019 9:10:44AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 236680 5/2/2019 075635 WCP SOLUTIONS 236681 5/2/2019 077043 WEDER, GWENDOLYN 236682 5/2/2019 073552 WELCO SALES LLC Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) Fac Maint Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 Tota I : 4/9-4/30 PICKLEBALL 4/9-4/30/19 PICKLEBALL LEAGUE IV 4/9-4/30/19 PICKLEBALL LEAGUE IV 001.000.64.571.25.41.00 Total 7638 UTILITY BILLING - 5000 #9 ENV, 50( Utility Billing - 5000 #9 Env, 5000 #10 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 Utility Billing - 5000 #9 Env, 5000 #10 422.000.72.531.90.31.00 Utility Billing - 5000 #9 Env, 5000 #10 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 7640 250 2 PART NOTICE OF CORRECTI, 250 2 Part Notice of Correction Form: 001.000.62.524.10.31.00 7642 UTILITY BILLING - 5000 PINK SHEE Utility Billing - 5000 Pink Sheets 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 Utility Billing - 5000 Pink Sheets 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 Utility Billing - 5000 Pink Sheets 422.000.72.531.90.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 4.3.b Page: 37 aD L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 a m 127.2( u L 13.2< 2,468.61 m z v 144.0( 144.0t c �a 218.0( �a a 218.0( 218.0E U 4- 0 22.6 , 0 22.6, a a Q 22.6E rn N 0 262.5( 0 E 66.61 R U 66.6 -, y E 66.6E U �a Q Page: 37 Packet Pg. 103 vchlist 05/02/2019 9:10:44AM Bank code : usbank Voucher List City of Edmonds Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account 236682 5/2/2019 073552 WELCO SALES LLC (Continued) 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.31.00 7644 LETTERHEAD FOR FINANCE DEPT Letterhead for Finance dept 001.000.31.514.23.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.31.514.23.31.00 Total 236683 5/2/2019 069691 WESTERN SYSTEMS 0000038652 TRAFFIC - SIGNAL BOX UPGRADE Traffic - Signal Box Upgrade Parts 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 Freight 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 Total 236684 5/2/2019 076938 W ISEMAN, HALEY 7356 ART CLASS 7356 PRINCESS DOLLHOUSE ART 7356 PRINCESS DOLLHOUSE ART 001.000.64.571.22.41.00 Total 236685 5/2/2019 070432 ZACHOR & THOMAS PS INC 19-EDM0004 APR-19 RETAINER Monthly Retainer 001.000.36.515.33.41.00 Tota I : 236686 5/2/2019 076937 ZARD, ECHO 37619 ASL INTERPRETER COURT 04-24-2 ASL INTERPRETER COURT 04-24-2 001.000.23.512.50.41.01 Tota I : 4.3.b Page: 38 a� L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 a m 6.9< 'D U m 6.9< 6.91 Y m 145.0( m c 15.Of M 1,365.4( �a 0 21,808.0( a 1,194.0( 2,392.2 0 25,394.21 0 L a a Q 68.7E " 68.7E r' N O LO 0 23,870.1( E 23,870.1( 'R c 104.3 t 104.3 , Q Page: 38 Packet Pg. 104 vchlist 05/02/2019 9:10:44AM Bank code: usbank Voucher Date Vendor 88 Vouchers for bank code : usbank 88 Vouchers in this report Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account Bank total Total vouchers 4.3.b Page: 39 Amoun 1 i 409,254.9! i 409,254.9° i rn N O LA O N E 2 U C E t V f6 Q Page: 39 Packet Pg. 105 4.3.c vchlist 04/19/2019 11:44:55AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 4192019 4/19/2019 062693 US BANK Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account 4675 4675 PARKS CREDIT CARD AMAZON: REC SUPPLIES: WRITING 001.000.64.571.22.31.00 AMAZON: REC SUPPLIES: POST -IT 001.000.64.571.22.31.00 AMAZON: LAPEL MICROPHONE 001.000.64.571.22.31.00 AMAZON: IPHONE TRIPOD 001.000.64.571.22.31.00 AMAZON: REC SUPPLIES: WRITINC 001.000.64.571.22.31.00 AMAZON: ADOBE PHOTOSHOP ELI 001.000.64.571.21.49.00 COMCAST BUSINESS: MEADOWDF 001.000.64.571.29.42.00 COMCAST BUSINESS: CEMETERY 130.000.64.536.20.42.00 AMAZON: PM SUPPLIES: UMBRELL 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 AMAZON: REC SUPPLIES: PRINTEF 001.000.64.571.22.31.00 AMAZON: REC SUPPLIES: BUBBLE 001.000.64.571.22.31.00 PACIFIC COAST MEMORIALS: VETE 127.000.64.575.50.31.00 SURVEY MONKEY: PLAYGROUND 001.000.64.571.21.41.00 BRINE SHRIMP DIRECT: SHRIMP El 001.000.64.571.23.31.00 JOANN STORES: DISCOVERY SUPI 001.000.64.571.23.31.00 JOANN STORES: DISCOVERY SUPI 001.000.64.571.23.31.00 DOLLAR STORE: DISCOVERY PRO, Page: 1 m L 3 c ea Amoun 00 0 a d 0 17.2, m =a 18.6, Y m 24.3� u 26.4E aD 28.6( c �a 110.2� o 336.2( a 386.2( 57.1 IS R 47.2, o L a a 13.2' a rn 231.6' o" 185.1' c m L 11.01 E t 5.3E a Page: 1 Packet Pg. 106 vchlist 04/19/2019 11:44:55AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 4192019 4/19/2019 062693 US BANK 1 Vouchers for bank code : usbank 1 Vouchers in this report Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) 001.000.64.571.23.31.00 AMAZON: PM SUPPLIES: GRAFFITI 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 AMAZON: PM SUPPLIES: HAZEL MI 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 ISSUU: DIGITAL CRAZE 001.000.64.571.22.49.00 AMAZON: PRESCHOOL SUPPLIES 001.000.64.571.29.31.00 DSS: PRESCHOOL SUPPLIES 001.000.64.571.29.31.00 WASHINGTON STATE FERRIES FEE 001.000.64.576.80.49.00 AMAZON: WOTS SUPPLIES: LABEL 117.100.64.573.20.31.00 FACTORY DIRECT PARTY: GYMNA; 001.000.64.571.28.31.00 B I D-1 687/0907 BID/ED! ANNUAL MEETING SUPPLI BID/Ed! supplies for annual meeting 140.000.61.558.70.31.00 BID/Ed! Facebook advertising and 140.000.61.558.70.41.40 BID/Ed! HDMI cable for annual meetii 140.000.61.558.70.31.00 Total: Bank total Total vouchers 4.3.c Page: 2 m L 3 c Amoun .y 0 a 5.4, 91.4� =a 76.0E ui Y m 38.9� 81.5� m c aD 202.7E c �a 23.4( o 66.7( a 51.8E •� U 0 13.1E 0 155.3' a a Q 2,359.41 rn 2,359.41 0 2,359.41 3 c E a Page: 2 Packet Pg. 107 4.3.d vchlist 04/30/2019 9:13:37AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 4302019 4/30/2019 076380 BETTER PROPERTIES METRO 1 Vouchers for bank code : usbank 1 Vouchers in this report Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account May 2019 ACCT #00397358 4TH AVE PARKIN( 4th Avenue Parking Lot Rent - May 2( 001.000.39.542.64.45.00 Total Bank total : Total vouchers : Page: 1 m L 3 c ea Amoun 00 a 0 0 417.E , m 417.6 , 15 N 417.61 c 0 L Q G 2 V 4- 0 El 3 El Page: 1 Packet Pg. 108 4.3.e PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title) Project Engineering Accounting Project Funding Protect Title Number Number c a� STM 174th St. & 71st Ave Storm Improvements c521 E8F6 E STM 183rd PI SW Storm Repairs c491 E6FE R 0. m L SWR 2016 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Projects c469 ESGA 3 SWR 2017 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Project i013 E6GA c WTR 2017 Waterline Replacement Projects i014 E6J13 N 0 STM 2018 Lorian Woods Study s018 EBFA m STR 2018 Minor Sidewalk Project i032 EBDA +. U STR 2018 Overlay Program i030 EBCB SWR 2018 Sewerline Overlays i035 EBCE Y SWR 2018 Sewerline Replacement Project c492 E6GC STR 2018 Traffic Calming i027 EBAA r WTR 2018 Waterline Overlays i034 EBCD WTR 2018 Waterline Replacement Project c493 E6JC m STR 2019 Guardrail Install i039 E9AB M STR 2019 Overlay Program i036 E9CA 0 STR 2019 Pedestrian Safety Program i041 E9DB Q. SWR 2019 Sewerline Replacement Project c516 EBGA E STM 2019 Storm Maintenance Project c525 EBFC 0 WTR 2019 Swedish Waterline Replacement c523 EBJA STR 2019 Traffic Calming i038 E9AA 0 UTILITIES 2019 Utility Rate & GFC Update s020 EBJB Q WTR 2019 Waterline Overlay i043 E9CB .. a� WTR 2019 Waterline Replacement c498 E7JA r 0 STR 2020 Overlay Program i042 EOCA c STR 220th Adaptive i028 EBAB ;n STM 224th & 98th Drainage Improvements c486 E6FB m E STR 228th St. SW Corridor Improvements i005 E7AC 0 z 'o STR 236th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Madrona School) c425 E3DD a STR 238th St. Island & Misc. Ramps i037 EBDC y D STR 238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave) c423 E3DB >+ STR 238th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Hwy 99) c485 E6DA r STR 76th Ave W & 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements i029 EBCA m STR 76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements c368 E1 CA u_ ; c STR 84th Ave W Overlay from 220th to 212th i031 EBCC m E STR 89th PI W Retaining Wall i025 E7CD U 0 STR ADA Curb Ramps i033 EBDB r Q STR ADA Transition Plan s016 E6DI3 STR Admiral Way Pedestrian Crossing i040 E9DA Revised 5/1/2019 Packet Pg. 109 4.3.e PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title) Project Engineering Accounting Project Funding Protect Title Number Number STIR Audible Pedestrian Signals i024 E7AB STIR Bikelink Project c474 E5DA SWR Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase I c456 E4GB SWR Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase II c488 E6GB STIR Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements i026 E7DC STIR Citywide Protected/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion i015 E6AB WTR Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave) c482 E5JB STM Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station c455 E41FE FAC Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab c443 E4MB STM Edmonds Marsh Feasibility Study c380 E2FC STIR Edmonds Street Waterfront Connector c478 E5DB WTR Five Corners Reservoir Re -coating c473 E5KA PM Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor c282 E8MA STIR Hwy 99 Enhancements (Phase III) c405 E2AD STIR Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization s014 E6AA STM Lake Ballinger Associated Projects c436 E4FD SWR Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study sol 1 E5GB SWR Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study c461 E4GC STIR Minor Sidewalk Program i017 E6DD STM Northstream Culvert Repair Under Puget Drive i011 E61FA STM Northstream Pipe Abandonment on Puget Drive c410 E31FE STM NPDES (Students Saving Salmon) m013 E7FG STM OVD Slope Repair & Stabilization m105 E71FA STM Seaview Park Infiltration Facility c479 E5FD WWTP Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring c446 E4HA UTILITIES Standard Details Updates solo E5NA STM Storm Drain Improvements @ 9510 232nd St. SW c495 E7FB STM Stormwater Comp Plan Update s017 E6FD STIR Sunset Walkway Improvements c354 El DA STIR Trackside Warning System c470 E5AA UTILITIES Utility Rate Update s013 E6JA PRK Veteran's Plaza c480 E6MA PRK Waterfront Restoration m103 E7MA STM Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration c435 E4FC WWTP WWTP Outfall Pipe Modifications c481 E5HA Revised 5/1/2019 Packet Pg. 110 4.3.e PROJECT NUMBERS (By Engineering Number) Engineering Project Project Accounting Funding Number Number Project Title M 2020 Overlay Progra STR E1 CA c368 76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements TR c354 Sunset Walkway Improvements STR E2AD c405 Hwy 99 Enhancements (Phase III) S c380 Edmonds Marsh Feasibility Study STR E3DB c423 238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave) STR 236th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Madrona School) STM E31FE c410 Northstream Pipe Abandonment on Puget Drive Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration STM E4FD c436 Lake Ballinger Associated Projects 455 Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station EM SWR E4GB c456 Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase I 4GC c461 Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow gtlAx/ A , WWTP E4HA c446 Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring ir Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab STR E5AA c470 Trackside Warning System Bikelink Project STR E5DB c478 Edmonds Street Waterfront Connector E5FD A0479 Seaview Park Infiltration Facility SWR E5GA c469 2016 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Projects Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Stud _ WWTP E5HA c481 WWTP Outfall Pipe Modifications WTR yton St l�RepIacemPn�ct (3rd Ave to 9th Ave) - WTR E5KA c473 Five Corners Reservoir Re -coating solo Standard Details Updates STR E6AA s014 Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization i01�Citywide Protected/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion STR E6DA c485 238th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Hwy 99) 016 ADA Transition Plan STR E6DD i017 Minor Sidewalk Program E6FA _ Northstream Culvert Repair Under Puget Drive STM E6FB c486 224th & 98th Drainage Improvements s017 Stormwater Comp Plan Update dohm it STM E61FE c491 183rd PI SW Storm Repairs i013 2017 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Project SWR E6GB c488 Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase II TSWR 492 2018 Sewerline Replacement Project UTILITIES E6JA s013 Utility Rate Update Revised 5/1/2019 Packet Pg. 111 4.3.e PROJECT NUMBERS (By Engineering Number) Engineering Protect Project Accounting Funding Number Number Protect Title WTR E6J13 i014 2017 Waterline Replacement Projects WTR E6JC c493 2018 Waterline Replacement Project RK E6MA Veteran's Plaza STR E7AB i024 Audible Pedestrian Signals STR E7AC i005 228th St. SW Corridor Improvements STR E7CD i025 89th PI W Retaining Wall STR i026& Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements STM E71FA m105 OVD Slope Repair & Stabilization W499V Storm Drain Improvements @ 9510 232nd St. SW STM E7FG m013 NPDES (Students Saving Salmon) 2019 Waterline Replacement , PRK E7MA m103 Waterfront Restoration TR 2018 Traffic Calming , STR E8AB i028 220th Adaptive i029 76th Ave W & 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements STR E8CB i030 2018 Overlay Program Fr i031 84th Ave W Overlay from 220th to 212th WTR E8CD i034 2018 Waterline Overlays E8CE i035 2018 Sewerline Overlays STR E8DA i032 2018 Minor Sidewalk Project E8DB i033 ADA Curb Ramps STR E8DC i037 238th St. Island & Misc. Ramps �n� STM E8FA 2018 Lorian Woods Study STM E8FB c521 174th St. & 71 st Ave Storm Improvements c525 2019 Storm Maintenance Project SWR E8GA c516 2019 Sewerline Replacement Project 2019 Swedish Waterline Replacement c523 UTILITIES E8J13 s020 2019 Utility Rate & GFC Update PM jME81 c282 Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor STR E9AA i038 2019 Traffic Calming i039 ardrail Install STR E9CA i036 2019 Overlay Program i043 2019 Waterline Overl STR E9DA i040 Admiral Way Pedestrian Crossing i041 2019 Pedestrian Safety Program Revised 5/1/2019 Packet Pg. 112 4.3.e PROJECT NUMBERS (By New Project Accounting Number) Engineering Protect Protect Accounting Funding Number Number Protect Title c a� PM E8MA c282 Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor STIR E1 DA c354 Sunset Walkway Improvements R 0. m L STIR E1 CA c368 76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements 3 STM E2FC c380 Edmonds Marsh Feasibility Study c STIR E2AD c405 Hwy 99 Enhancements (Phase III) N 0 STM EYE c410 Northstream Pipe Abandonment on Puget Drive m STIR E3DB c423 238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave) STIR E3DD c425 236th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Madrona School) STM E4FC c435 Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration Y STM E4FD c436 Lake Ballinger Associated Projects FAC E4MB c443 Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab r WWTP E4HA c446 Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring STM E4FE c455 Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station m SWR E4GB c456 Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase I M SWR E4GC c461 Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study 0 SWR E5GA c469 2016 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Projects Q. STIR E5AA c470 Trackside Warning System WTR E51KA c473 Five Corners Reservoir Re -coating 0 STIRE5DA c474 Bikelink Project STIR E5DB c478 Edmonds Street Waterfront Connector 0 a STM E51FD c479 Seaview Park Infiltration Facility a Q PRK E6MA c480 Veteran's Plaza WWTP E5HA c481 WWTP Outfall Pipe Modifications r 0 WTR E5JB c482 Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave) 'n 0 STIR E6DA c485 238th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Hwy 99) m STM E6FB c486 224th & 98th Drainage Improvements E 0 SWR E6GB c488 Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase II ? 0 STM E6FE c491 183rd PI SW Storm Repairs Lm a SWR E6GC c492 2018 Sewerline Replacement Project y D WTR E6JC c493 2018 Waterline Replacement Project r c STM E7FB c495 Storm Drain Improvements @ 9510 232nd St. SW WTR E7JA c498 2019 Waterline Replacement m L LL SWR E8GA c516 2019 Sewerline Replacement Project c STM E8FB c521 174th St. & 71 st Ave Storm Improvements m E WTR E8JA c523 2019 Swedish Waterline Replacement t U STM E8FC c525 2019 Storm Maintenance Project r Q STIR E7AC i005 228th St. SW Corridor Improvements STM E6FA i011 Northstream Culvert Repair Under Puget Drive Revised 5/1/2019 Packet Pg. 113 4.3.e PROJECT NUMBERS (By New Project Accounting Number) Engineering Protect Protect Accounting Funding Number Number Protect Title SWR E6GA i013 2017 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Project WTR E6J13 i014 2017 Waterline Replacement Projects STIR E6AB i015 Citywide Protected/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion STIR E6DD i017 Minor Sidewalk Program STIR E7AB i024 Audible Pedestrian Signals STIR E7CD i025 89th PI W Retaining Wall STIR E7DC i026 Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements STIR EBAA i027 2018 Traffic Calming STIR EBAB i028 220th Adaptive STIR EBCA i029 76th Ave W & 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements STIR EBCB i030 2018 Overlay Program STIR EBCC i031 84th Ave W Overlay from 220th to 212th STIR EBDA i032 2018 Minor Sidewalk Project STIR EBDB i033 ADA Curb Ramps WTR EBCD i034 2018 Waterline Overlays SWR EBCE i035 2018 Sewerline Overlays STIR E9CA i036 2019 Overlay Program STIR EBDC i037 238th St. Island & Misc. Ramps STIR E9AA i038 2019 Traffic Calming STIR E9AB i039 2019 Guardrail Install STIR E9DA i040 Admiral Way Pedestrian Crossing STIR E9DB i041 2019 Pedestrian Safety Program STIR EOCA i042 2020 Overlay Program WTR E9CB i043 2019 Waterline Overlay STM E71FG m013 NPDES (Students Saving Salmon) PRK E7MA m103 Waterfront Restoration STM E7FA m105 OVD Slope Repair & Stabilization UTILITIES ESNA solo Standard Details Updates SWR ESGB s0l l Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study UTILITIES E6JA s013 Utility Rate Update STIR E6AA s014 Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization STIR E6DB s016 ADA Transition Plan STM E6FD s017 Stormwater Comp Plan Update STM EBFA s018 2018 Lorian Woods Study UTILITIES EBJB s020 2019 Utility Rate & GFC Update Revised 5/1/2019 Packet Pg. 114 4.3.e PROJECT NUMBERS (By Funding) Project Engineering Accounting Project Funding Protect Title Number Number FAC Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab c443 E4MB PM Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor c282 EBMA PRK Veteran's Plaza c480 E6MA PRK Waterfront Restoration m103 E7MA STM 174th St. & 71st Ave Storm Improvements c521 EBFB STM 183rd PI SW Storm Repairs c491 E61FE STM 2018 Lorian Woods Study s018 EBFA STM 2019 Storm Maintenance Project c525 EBFC STM 224th & 98th Drainage Improvements c486 E6FB STM Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station c455 E41FE STM Edmonds Marsh Feasibility Study c380 E2FC STM Lake Ballinger Associated Projects c436 E4FD STM Northstream Culvert Repair Under Puget Drive i011 E61FA STM Northstream Pipe Abandonment on Puget Drive c410 EYE STM NPDES (Students Saving Salmon) m013 E7FG STM OVD Slope Repair & Stabilization m105 E71FA STM Seaview Park Infiltration Facility c479 ESFD STM Storm Drain Improvements @ 9510 232nd St. SW c495 E7FB STM Stormwater Comp Plan Update s017 E6FD STM Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration c435 E4FC STIR 2018 Minor Sidewalk Project i032 EBDA STIR 2018 Overlay Program i030 EBCB STIR 2018 Traffic Calming i027 EBAA STIR 2019 Guardrail Install i039 E9AB STIR 2019 Overlay Program i036 E9CA STIR 2019 Pedestrian Safety Program i041 E9DB STIR 2019 Traffic Calming i038 E9AA STIR 2020 Overlay Program i042 EOCA STIR 228th St. SW Corridor Improvements i005 E7AC STIR 236th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Madrona School) c425 E3DD STIR 238th St. Island & Misc. Ramps i037 EBDC STIR 238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave) c423 E3DB STIR 238th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Hwy 99) c485 E6DA STIR 76th Ave W & 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements i029 EBCA STIR 76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements c368 E1CA STIR 84th Ave W Overlay from 220th to 212th i031 EBCC STIR 89th PI W Retaining Wall i025 E7CD Revised 5/1/2019 Packet Pg. 115 4.3.e PROJECT NUMBERS (By Funding) Project Engineering Accounting Project Funding Project Title Number Number STIR ADA Curb Ramps i033 E8DB STIR ADA Transition Plan s016 E6DB STIR Admiral Way Pedestrian Crossing i040 E9DA STIR Audible Pedestrian Signals i024 E7AB STIR Bikelink Project c474 E5DA STIR Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements i026 E7DC STIR Citywide Protected/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion i015 E6AB STIR Edmonds Street Waterfront Connector c478 E5DB STIR Hwy 99 Enhancements (Phase III) c405 E2AD STIR Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization s014 E6AA STIR Minor Sidewalk Program i017 E6DD STIR Sunset Walkway Improvements c354 E1DA STIR Trackside Warning System c470 E5AA STIR 220th Adaptive i028 E8AB SWR 2016 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Projects c469 E5GA SWR 2017 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Project i013 E6GA SWR 2018 Sewerline Overlays i035 E8CE SWR 2018 Sewerline Replacement Project c492 E6GC SWR 2019 Sewerline Replacement Project c516 E8GA SWR Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase I c456 E4GB SWR Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase II c488 E6GB SWR Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study sol 1 E5GB SWR Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study c461 E4GC UTILITIES 2019 Utility Rate & GFC Update s02o E8J13 UTILITIES Standard Details Updates solo E5NA UTILITIES Utility Rate Update s013 E6JA WTR 2017 Waterline Replacement Projects i014 E6J13 WTR 2018 Waterline Overlays i034 E8CD WTR 2018 Waterline Replacement Project c493 E6JC WTR 2019 Swedish Waterline Replacement c523 E8JA WTR 2019 Waterline Overlay i043 E9CB WTR 2019 Waterline Replacement c498 E7JA WTR Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave) c482 E5J13 WTR Five Corners Reservoir Re -coating c473 E51KA WWTP Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring c446 E4HA WWTP WWTP Outfall Pipe Modifications c481 E5HA Revised 5/1/2019 Packet Pg. 116 4.3.f Payroll Earnings Summary Report City of Edmonds Pay Period: 920 (04/16/2019 to 04/30/2019) c Hour Type Hour Class Description Hours Amount -ed2 REGULAR HOURS Educational Pav Correction 0.00 -156.28 111 ABSENT NO PAY LEAVE 1.50 0.00 112 ABSENT NO PAY NON HIRED 40.00 0.00 121 SICK SICK LEAVE 618.50 22,138.90 122 VACATION VACATION 736.00 33,582.23 123 HOLIDAY HOLIDAY HOURS 61.00 2,294.41 124 HOLIDAY FLOATER HOLIDAY 58.50 1,741.42 125 COMP HOURS COMPENSATORY TIME 205.50 7,952.60 130 COMP HOURS Holidav Compensation Used 9.00 283.29 131 MILITARY MILITARY LEAVE -12.00 -420.50 141 BEREAVEMENT BEREAVEMENT 9.50 238.32 150 REGULAR HOURS Kelly Dav Used 252.00 11,147.88 155 COMP HOURS COMPTIME AUTO PAY 309.31 14,539.28 157 SICK SICK LEAVE PAYOFF 149.03 6,004.54 158 VACATION VACATION PAYOFF 189.41 7,631.48 160 VACATION MANAGEMENT LEAVE 29.00 1,655.97 170 REGULAR HOURS COUNCIL BASE PAY 700.00 8,750.00 174 REGULAR HOURS COUNCIL PRESIDENTS PAY 0.00 200.00 175 REGULAR HOURS COUNCIL PAY FOR NO MEDICP 0.00 3,521.58 190 REGULAR HOURS REGULAR HOURS 18,316.70 700,963.78 191 REGULAR HOURS FIRE PENSION PAYMENTS 4.00 4,781.92 210 OVERTIME HOURS OVERTIME -STRAIGHT 2.00 66.70 215 OVERTIME HOURS WATER WATCH STANDBY 48.00 2,660.28 216 MISCELLANEOUS STANDBY TREATMENT PLANT 15.00 1,371.01 220 OVERTIME HOURS OVERTIME 1.5 325.75 21,992.26 225 OVERTIME HOURS OVERTIME -DOUBLE 3.00 197.52 400 MISCELLANEOUS MISC PAY 0.00 100.00 410 MISCELLANEOUS WORKING OUT OF CLASS 0.00 450.84 411 SHIFT DIFFERENTIAL SHIFT DIFFERENTIAL 0.00 1,466.61 600 RETROACTIVE PAY RETROACTIVE PAY 0.00 349.11 602 COMP HOURS ACCRUED COMP 1.0 109.00 0.00 604 COMP HOURS ACCRUED COMP TIME 1.5 282.00 0.00 606 COMP HOURS ACCRUED COMP 2.0 2.00 0.00 05/02/2019 Packet Pg. 117 4.3.f Payroll Earnings Summary Report City of Edmonds Pay Period: 920 (04/16/2019 to 04/30/2019) c Hour Type Hour Class Description Hours Amount acc MISCELLANEOUS ACCREDITATION PAY 0.00 78.66 acs MISCELLANEOUS ACCRED/POLICE SUPPORT 0.00 172.00 boc MISCELLANEOUS BOC II Certification 0.00 91.74 colre MISCELLANEOUS Collision Reconstruction ist 0.00 117.51 cpl MISCELLANEOUS TRAINING CORPORAL 0.00 160.86 crt MISCELLANEOUS CERTIFICATION III PAY 0.00 564.90 det MISCELLANEOUS DETECTIVE PAY 0.00 111.20 det4 MISCELLANEOUS Detective 4% 0.00 1,075.64 ed1 EDUCATION PAY EDUCATION PAY 2% 0.00 649.78 ed2 EDUCATION PAY EDUCATION PAY 4% 0.00 829.56 ed3 EDUCATION PAY EDUCATION PAY 6% 0.00 4,944.27 k9 MISCELLANEOUS K-9 PAY 0.00 217.06 Iq1 LONGEVITY LONGEVITY PAY 2% 0.00 816.16 Ig10 LONGEVITY LONGEVITY 5.5% 0.00 148.17 Ig11 LONGEVITY LONGEVITY PAY 2.5% 0.00 958.20 Ig12 LONGEVITY Lonqevitv 9% 0.00 5,734.58 Ig13 LONGEVITY Lonqevitv 7% 0.00 1,733.25 Ig14 LONGEVITY Lonqevitv 5% 0.00 1,322.33 Ig15 LONGEVITY LONGEVITY 7.5% 0.00 381.68 Igo LONGEVITY Lonqevitv 1 % 0.00 371.14 Iq5 LONGEVITY Lonqevitv 3% 0.00 444.80 Ig6 LONGEVITY Lonqevitv .5% 0.00 286.96 Iq7 LONGEVITY Lonqevitv 1.5% 0.00 507.39 Ig9 LONGEVITY Lonqevitv 3.5% 0.00 104.93 mtc MISCELLANEOUS MOTORCYCLE PAY 0.00 222.40 pds MISCELLANEOUS Public Disclosure Specialist 0.00 101.78 phv MISCELLANEOUS PHYSICAL FITNESS PAY 0.00 2,107.53 prof MISCELLANEOUS PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS ; 0.00 173.48 sdp MISCELLANEOUS SPECIAL DUTY PAY 5% 0.00 287.66 sqt MISCELLANEOUS ADMINISTRATIVE SERGEANT 0.00 173.48 sro MISCELLANEOUS School Resource Officer 0.00 111.20 str MISCELLANEOUS STREET CRIMES 0.00 462.88 traf MISCELLANEOUS TRAFFIC 0.00 241.31 05/02/2019 Packet Pg. 118 4.3.f Payroll Earnings Summary Report City of Edmonds Pay Period: 920 (04/16/2019 to 04/30/2019) Hour Type Hour Class Description Hours 22,463.70 Total Net Pay: Amount $881,209.64 $598,150.41 05/02/2019 Packet Pg. 119 4.3.g Benefit Checks Summary Report City of Edmonds Pay Period: 920 - 04/16/2019 to 04/30/2019 Bank: usbank - US Bank Check # Date Payee # Name Check Amt Direct Deposit 63727 05/03/2019 epoa EPOA-1 POLICE 69.00 0.00 63728 05/03/2019 jhan JOHN HANCOCK 619.70 0.00 63729 05/03/2019 flex NAVIA BENEFIT SOLUTIONS 2,337.07 0.00 63730 05/03/2019 icma VANTAGE TRANSFER AGENTS 304884 4,582.81 0.00 63731 05/03/2019 afscme WSCCCE, AFSCME AFL-CIO 2,250.38 0.00 9,858.96 0.00 Bank: wire - US BANK Check # Date Payee # Name Check Amt Direct Deposit 2869 05/03/2019 pens DEPT OF RETIREMENT SYSTEMS 309,872.14 0.00 2873 05/03/2019 aflac AFLAC 6,069.58 0.00 2876 05/03/2019 us US BANK 107,227.10 0.00 2877 05/03/2019 mebt WTRISC FBO #N3177B1 107,541.81 0.00 2878 05/03/2019 pb NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTION 6,497.32 0.00 2879 05/03/2019 wadc WASHINGTON STATE TREASURER 28,880.42 0.00 2880 05/03/2019 oe OFFICE OF SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT 628.50 0.00 566,716.87 0.00 Grand Totals: 576,575.83 0.00 rn Lh 0 LO 0 a� c m 0 L CD E V Q 5/2/2019 Packet Pg. 120 4.4 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 05/7/2019 Acknowledgment of Claim for Damages Staff Lead: WCIA Claims Department: City Clerk's Office Preparer: Nicholas Falk Background/History n/a Staff Recommendation Acknowledge receipt of Claims for Damages by minute entry. Narrative Barbara Soltess submitted a claim for damages in an undetermined amount. Attachments: Barbara Soltess CFD Packet Pg. 121 4.4.a CITY OF EDMONDS CLAIM FOR RfWXdVBEbRM Date Claim Form MAY 0 2 2019 Received by City �r��� S9�ss EDMONDS CITY CLERK Please take note that , who currently resides at mailing address 17{c 1 -70 home phone # SOq'1 2 S�� , work phone #51q-0:S] 1 and who resided at 1 I S at the time of the occurrence and whose date of birth is & — I'u, is claiming damages against S in the sum of $ arising out of the following circumstances listed below. DATE OF OCCURRENCE: 317, 2-1" f TIME: 3'g50L LOCATION OF OCCURRENCE: •SG e 9NC A S ` �ll DESCRIPTION:�� * mtB+1 4, Describe the conduct and circumstance that brought about the injury or damag Also describe the injury or dama e. I 1 VV S 1 Y 0 fv sI :5 0lUld Wd 1 0 ffy r, Wr- A a"Y 6 1- &,r?A.4s� p, 4 +r 1AA t ' 5r S I k tv MLPA - tfot 10 kwm 110f- Cr ttach an 1r sheet additional information, if needed) � S � W S� 6-0A fV 1rY C(AfI (sfe p ( �q F -ds�t� J. or 2. Provide a list,of witnesses, if applicable, to the occurrence including names, addresses, and phone numbers. Attach copies of all documentation relating to expenses, injuries, losses, and/or estimates for repair. Have you submitted a claim for damages to your insurance company? Yes No If so, please provide the name of the insurance company: and the policy #: . * * ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR AUTOMOBILE CLAIMS ONLY * License Plate # Type Auto: (year) (make) DRIVER: Address: Phone#: Passengers: Name: Address: !7onni Revised aSIW14 Driver License # (model) OWNER: Address: Phone#: Name: Address: WCASq 11)' lly id my UM04 [ but sIm �X 6kj fb BLS rx0 co loon- I ofttw V Oft l id. -1b qft jnfifno If was Nf 14 -6twW C %t/V� PA (zo Pagc I of 2 �� Packet Pg. 122 4.4.a * * NOTE: THIS FORM MUST BE SIGNED AND NOTARIZED * * 1 ��^ �� I fc S S' being first duly sworn, depose and say that I am the claimant for the above described; that I have read the above claim, know the contents thereof and believe the same to be true. I further acknowledge that any information I provide as part of this claim may be considered a public record and may be subject to disclosure pursuant to RCW 42.% X od&(L� A4'w Signature of Claimant(s) State of Washington County of C.' KQ.IC-*l I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that tr44f 6&v-(k C�,p 1-k5e, is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that (he/she) signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be (his/her) free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. D ed. �" $O -tnl AMY C HOLMES tu ignature NOTARY PUBLIC ti ) STATE OF WASHINGTON Title COMMISSION EXPIRES My appointment expires: JUNE 25, 2020 Please present the completed claim form to: Fonu Revised 05/06/14 City Clerk's Office City of Edmonds 121 51h Avenue North Edmonds, WA, 98020 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Page 2 of 2 Packet Pg. 123 4.5 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 05/7/2019 Confirmation of Salary Commission Appointments Staff Lead: Mary Ann Hardie Department: Human Resources Preparer: Scott Passey Background/History 2019 is a Salary Commission year. The Salary Commission will meet between July 1 - September 30, 2019 to review the salaries paid by the City of each elected official (for Mayor and the Council) and make a determination of any salary changes for these positions. There are five (5) members that serve on the commission, who are appointed by the Mayor and confirmed by Council. There were two (2) vacancies to the Salary Commission for members whose terms are expired or are expiring this year prior to the start of the commission's work. The City published the Commission vacancy notice in March 2019 and, after the application deadline date, the Mayor interviewed candidates for the vacancies. From this process, the Mayor has selected both Jeff Hodson and Don Hall for appointment to a second term to the commission to fill these vacancies. Jeff Hodson was initially appointed and confirmed to serve a one year term to the 2017 Salary Commission that expired in 2018. With his term expiration, there was a vacancy to the commission and he applied to serve another term. Don Hall was initially appointed and confirmed to serve a two year term to the 2017 Salary Commission that expires before the start of the July 2019 commission. With his term expiration, there is a vacancy to the commission for this year's commission and he has applied to serve another term. Following the vacancy selection process, the Mayor intends to appoint both Hodson and Hall for a second term to the commission, subject to Council interview and confirmation. Staff Recommendation Confirmation of appointments for both Jeff Hodson and Don Hall to each serve a three (3) year term to the Salary Commission for the period 6/1/19 - 5/31/22. Narrative There were two (2) vacancies to the Salary Commission for members whose terms had expired or were expiring before the start of the Salary Commission this year. The City published the Salary Commission vacancy notice in March 2019 and after the application deadline date, the Mayor interviewed candidates for the vacancies. From this process, the Mayor has selected both Jeff Hodson and Don Hall for an appointment to a second term to the Salary Commission to fill these vacancies. Packet Pg. 124 4.5 The Commission applications for Hodson & Hall are attached. Attachments: Hodson - application Hall - application Packet Pg. 125 4.5.a ity of Edmonds Citizen Board and Commission Application (PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE) NOTE: This form is a public record and may be subject to disclosure upon request Salary Commission (Board or Commission) Name: Jeff Hodson Address: Occupational status and background: See attached Organizational affiliations: University of Washington Why are you seeking this appointment? See attached Date: March 9, 2019 :.►��;;;y� Day Phone: Evening Phone:, Cell. E-mail: What skills and knowledge do you have to meet the selection criteria? See attached Please list any other Board, Commission, Committee, or official positions you currently hold with the City of Edmonds: None Additional comments: See attached Please return this completed form to: Edmonds City Hall 121 51" Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 carolyn.lafave@edmondswa.gov Phone:425.771.0247 1 Fax:425.771.0252 Jeffrey A Hodson Signature r a Revised 4130114 Packet Pg. 126 4.5.a Application from Jeff Hodson, `or reappointment to the City of Edmonds Salary Commission Occupational Status and Background I serve as Director of Communications at the UW School of Public Health, overseeing internal and external communications, media relations, branding, etc., and have worked at the UW for seven years. I serve on numerous leadership and steering committees for the School of Public Health and sit on the UW's Marketing and Communications Executive Council. I am a former journalist and media trainer with extensive overseas experience (13 years in Cambodia, Thailand and India), and spent 10 years working at newspapers in the Chicago area. I am nearly a native, having grown up in what is now Shoreline. I graduated from Shorewood High School and have lived in Edmonds since 2012. Organizational Affiliations University of Washington Why are you seeking this appointment? I had the pleasure of serving on the Salary Commission in the summer of 2017. It was a rewarding experience to give back to the community in a small way and to work with fellow Edmonds citizens toward a common goal. As I wrote in my previous application, it's really critical to get the salaries right —to attract the best and brightest public servants and to ensure they are compensated fairly. I was encouraged to apply for another term by several people. What skills do you have to meet the selection criteria? I have good analytical, communication and consensus -building skills. In my service as salary commissioner, I helped develop an outreach and communications strategy, drafted a press release, and pushed for transparency about the commission's process. With my (basic) skills in Excel, I created numerous charts and graphs analyzing city officials' pay over time, including comparisons to other comparably sized cities in the region and to changes in the Consumer Price Index. This helped the commission clearly see the trends and enabled us to come to a thoughtful decision on salaries. I also helped put together a PowerPoint presentation for the Commission Chair to use when submitting our findings to Council. Please list any other Board, Commission, Committee, or official positions you currently hold with the City of Edmonds: None (previously Salary Commission, one-year term, 2017-18) Additional comments: It would be an honor to serve on the commission again. Sincerely, Jeff Hodson Packet Pg. 127 4.5.b City of Edmonds Citizen :board and Commission Application (PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE) P. \/ C t hr fY! i 3S ) (Board or Commission) Name: D o ;d A 4 P ),614— Address `*70. i S9" Date: 3 -- /: Day Phone: P Evening Phone: Cell: E-mail:- Occupational status and background: /Z'+i Re d Organizational affiliations: Why are you seeking this appointment? Prt�Lv12r-,P What skills and knowledge do you have to meet the selection criteria? O'Al jo-j S'4�v'ecwZs Please list any other Board, Commission, Committee, or official positions you currently hold with the City of Edmonds:. -/Vz) /V Additional comments: Please return this completed form to: Edmonds City Hall 121 5ch Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 carolvn.lafave@edmondswa.gov Q Signature Revised 418114 Phone:425.771.0247 1 Fax:425.771.0252 Packet Pg. 128 4.6 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 05/7/2019 Confirm Appointment of Candidate for a Board and Commission Staff Lead: Mayo Earling Department: Mayor's Office Preparer: Carolyn LaFave Background/History Due to a resignation, the position of Planning Board Alternate became open. Three qualified candidate applications were received. Mayor Earling interviewed the three candidates. Staff Recommendation Confirm appointment of Eric Moss to the Planning Board Alternate position. Narrative After interviewing the 3 candidates for the Planning Board Alternate position, Mayor Earling has chosen to appoint Eric Moss to the position. The Mayor believes Eric has the necessary skills and experience, and that he will be an asset to this board. Packet Pg. 129 4.7 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 05/7/2019 Shoreline Master Program Periodic Review Ordinance Staff Lead: Kernen Lien Department: Planning Division Preparer: Kernen Lien Background/History Under the Shoreline Management Act (SMA), each city and county with "shorelines of the state" must prepare and adopt a Shoreline Master Program (SMP) that is based on state laws and rules but tailored to the specific geographic, economic and environmental needs of the community. The SMP is essentially a combined comprehensive plan, zoning ordinance, and development permit system for shoreline specific uses. The SMA requires each city and county to review, and if necessary, revise their SMP at least once every eight years. The legislature set a staggered schedule that alternates with similar reviews under the Growth Management Act. The City of Edmonds is required to complete its SMP periodic review by June 30, 2019. The Edmonds City Council adopted Resolution No. 1411 initiating the periodic review and adopting the Work Program and Public Participation Plan on May 22, 2018. The Planning Board reviewed the SMP Periodic Review over the course of three meetings including a December 12, 2018 public hearing and has forwarded a recommendation to the City Council to adopt the proposed code amendments in the Marsh Memorandum as an addendum to the Shoreline Inventory and Characterization. The City Council heard an introduction on the SMP Periodic Review at the February 12, 2019 council meeting and held a public hearing on April 2, 2019. Following the April 2, 2019 public hearing, the Council directed staff to prepare an ordinance for adoption on the consent agenda. Staff Recommendation Adopt the attached ordinance approving the revisions to the Shoreline Master Program identified during this periodic review. Narrative The periodic review ensures the SMP stays current with changes in laws and rules, remains consistent with other City of Edmonds plans and regulations, and is responsive to changed circumstances, new information and improved data. The City of Edmonds just completed a comprehensive update of its SMP in June 2017. This Packet Pg. 130 4.7 comprehensive update took many years to complete and some recent amendments to the SMA and shoreline guidelines did not get incorporated in the City's SMP. As part of the process, a periodic review checklist was reviewed and completed to identify recent statutory and regulatory amendments that relate to shorelines in Edmonds. Most of the updates identified in the SMP Periodic Review Checklist are minor in nature and do not lead to substantially modifying the SMP adopted in 2017. Staff added the Other Review Elements section to the end of Ecology's checklist to identify a couple of other items that are being considered with this periodic update. Updates to the SMP may result from the site specific study of the Edmonds Marsh being undertaken by the City, such as updating the Shoreline Inventory and Characterization and potential modifications to the development regulations associated with the Urban Mixed Use IV shoreline jurisdiction. Exhibit 2 is a memorandum from Windward Environmental LLC which will serve as the addendum to the Shoreline Inventory and Characterization providing more information on the existing conditions of the Edmonds Marsh than currently exists in the Shoreline Inventory and Characterization. Additionally, staff identified section ECDC 24.80.100 for process clarifications how a shoreline permit review moves from a staff decision process (Type II) to a public hearing process (Type III). Revisions to this section were modeled on a similar process in the City's critical area regulations. Staff also recommended that the City of Edmonds revise its critical area ordinance (CAO) wetland regulations for consistency with Department of Ecology's most recent Wetland Guidance for CAO Updates. The recent CAO update was completed prior to Ecology's issuance of their updated wetland guidance. This updated guidance was incorporated into the SMP, but the CAO has yet to be revised to include the most recent guidance on wetlands. As a result, the City currently has two sets of wetland regulations, one that applies in shoreline jurisdiction and a second that applies outside of shoreline jurisdiction. Updating the CAO and incorporating the CAO by reference will provide consistency for wetland regulation within the City. The revised wetland regulations were adopted by the City Council on October 16, 2018 under Ordinance No. 4127. Attached is an ordinance adopting the Shoreline Master Program code revisions in Title 24 ECDC and the Windward Environmental LLC Memorandum as an addendum to the Shoreline Inventory and Characterization. Following adoption of the ordinance by the Council, the SMP will be forwarded to Ecology for their review and adoption process. The ordinance and SMP revisions will become effective 14 days after the Department of Ecology's final action on the SMP. Attachments: SMP Periodic Review Adopting Ordinance Packet Pg. 131 4.7.a ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, CONCERNING THE SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM PERIODIC REVIEW REQUIRED BY RCW 90.58.080(4). WHEREAS, the Shoreline Management Act (SMA) requires the City of Edmonds to develop and administer a Shoreline Master Program (SMP); and WHEREAS, the City of Edmonds, through Ordinance 4072, adopted a comprehensive SMP update as required by RCW 90.58.080(2), which was effective as of June 23, 2017; and WHEREAS, RCW 90.58.080(4) requires the City of Edmonds to periodically review and, if necessary, revise the master program, in this cycle, on or before June 30, 2019; and WHEREAS, the review process is intended to bring the SMP into compliance with requirements of the act or state rules that have been added or changed since the last SMP amendment, ensure the SMP remains consistent with amended comprehensive plans and regulations, and incorporate amendments deemed necessary to reflect changed circumstances, new information, or improved data; and WHEREAS, the City of Edmonds developed a public participation program for this periodic review in accordance with WAC 173-26-090(3)(a) to inform, involve and encourage participation of interested persons and private entities, tribes, and applicable agencies having interests and responsibilities relating to shorelines; and WHEREAS, the Edmonds City Council adopted Resolution No. 1411 initiating the periodic review and adopting the Work Program and Public Participation Plan on May 22, 2018; and WHEREAS, the City of Edmonds used Ecology's checklist of legislative and rule amendments to review amendments to chapter 90.58 RCW and department guidelines that have occurred since the master program was last amended, and determine if local amendments are needed to maintain compliance in accordance with WAC 173-26-090(3)(b)(i); and Packet Pg. 132 4.7.a WHEREAS, the City of Edmonds reviewed changes to the comprehensive plan and development regulations to determine if the shoreline master program policies and regulations remain consistent with them in accordance with WAC 173-26-090(3)(b)(ii); and WHEREAS, the City of Edmonds considered whether to incorporate any amendments needed to reflect changed circumstances, new information or improved data in accordance with WAC 173-26-090(3)(b)(iii); and WHEREAS, the City of Edmonds solicited comments on the draft proposal from the Department of Ecology in accordance with WAC 173-26-100(5); and WHEREAS, the City of Edmonds conducted a formal public comment period in compliance with requirements of WAC 173-26-100; and WHEREAS, the City of Edmonds published a legal notices for public hearings before the Planning Board and City Council, including a statement that the hearings were intended to address the periodic review in accordance with WAC 173-26-090(3)(c)(ii); and WHEREAS, a State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) environmental checklist was prepared based upon the Planning Board public hearing draft, and the City of Edmonds SEPA responsible official issued and circulated a copy of the checklist and a Determination of Non - Significance (DNS) on November 19, 2018; and WHEREAS, the City provided Notice of Intent to Adopt to the Washington State Department of Commerce in accordance with WAC 173-26-100(5); and WHEREAS, the City of Edmonds has followed its adopted public participation program, including the Planning Board's consideration of the SMP Periodic Review over the course of three meetings including a December 12, 2018 public hearing; and WHEREAS, the City of Edmonds Planning Board completed a review of staff recommendations; and WHEREAS, the Planning Board recommended approval of the proposed amendments and forwarded it to the City Council for review and adoption on December 12, 2018; and WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on the Planning Board recommendation on April 2, 2019; and Packet Pg. 133 4.7.a WHEREAS, after considering all public comments and evidence, the Council determined that the proposed amendments comply with all applicable laws and rules; and WHEREAS, this completes the City's required process for periodic review in accordance with RCW 90.58.080(4) and applicable state guidelines (WAC 173-26); NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Review and Evaluation. The Council hereby finds that the review and evaluation required by RCW 90.58.080(4) have occurred, as described in the recitals above. Section 2. Revisions to the SMP Regulations. Section 24.40.020 of the Edmonds Community Development Code, entitled "Critical areas," Section 24.70.010 of the Edmonds Community Development Code, entitled "Nonconforming Uses," 24.70.020 of the Edmonds Community Development Code, entitled "Nonconforming development, building and/or structure," 24.80.010 of the Edmonds Community Development Code, entitled "Exemptions from shoreline substantial development permit process," Section 24.80.100 of the Edmonds Community Development Code, entitled "Public hearings," Section 24.80.150 of the Edmonds Community Development Code, entitled "Administrative authority and responsibility," and Subsection 24.90.020.I of the Edmonds Community Development Code, entitled "Development," are hereby amended to read as set forth in Exhibit 1, attached to this ordinance and incorporated herein by this reference (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown in strike -through). Section 24.80.025 of the Edmonds Community Development Code, entitled "Developments not required to obtain shoreline permits or local reviews," Section 24.80.095 of the Edmonds Community Development Code, entitled "Shoreline restoration projects —Relief from shoreline master program development standards and use regulations," Section 24.80.105 of the Edmonds Community Development Code, entitled "Special procedures for WSDOT projects," and Subsection 24.90.020.GG of the Edmonds Community Development Code, entitled "Floodway," are hereby added to the Edmonds Community Development Code as new sections to read as set forth in Exhibit 1, attached to this ordinance and incorporated herein by Packet Pg. 134 4.7.a this reference (new text is shown in underline). All other portions of the City's SMP Regulations in Title 24 ECDC shall remain unchanged. Section 3. Revisions to the SMP Shoreline Inventory and Characterization. The Shoreline Inventory and Characterization is hereby supplemented to include the memorandum set forth in Exhibit 2, attached to this ordinance and incorporated herein by this reference. The memorandum attached as Exhibit 2 provides more information on the existing conditions of the Edmonds Marsh than previously existed in the Shoreline Inventory and Characterization. To the extent that any conflict exists between Exhibit 2 and the other portions of the Shoreline Inventory and Characterization, Exhibit 2 shall control. Section 4. Adoption. The Council hereby adopts the SMP revisions referenced above in Sections 2 and 3, finding the amended SMP consistent with the requirements of chapter 90.58 RCW and chapter 173-26 WAC, as they apply to these amendments. Section 5. Submission to Department of Ecology. The Development Services director or her designee is directed to submit the SMP and associated documents to the Department of Ecology for its review and approval. Once approved by the Department of Ecology no further action is necessary for compliance with RCW 90.58.080(4) for the periodic review update due on June 30, 2019. Section 6. Effective Date. The amendments to the SMP adopted through this Ordinance shall be effective 14 days after Department of Ecology final action as provided by RCW 90.58.090(7). Section 7. Severability. If any section, subsection, clause, sentence, or phrase of this ordinance should be held invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. Section 8. Publication. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifically delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum and shall take effect no earlier than five (5) days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the title. APPROVED: Packet Pg. 135 4.7.a MAYOR DAVE EARLING ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY: Im JEFF TARADAY FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE DATE: ORDINANCE NO. Packet Pg. 136 4.7.a SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. of the City of Edmonds, Washington On the day of , 2019, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed Ordinance No. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting of the title, provides as follows: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, CONCERNING THE SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM PERIODIC REVIEW REQUIRED BY RCW 90.58.080(4). The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request. DATED this day of 12019. 4840-7251-8158,v. 1 0 CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY Packet Pg. 137 EXHIBIT 1 4.7.a Edmonds Chapter 24.60 SPECIFIC USE POLICIES AND REGULATIONS Page 1115 24.40.020 Critical areas. A. Applicability. Critical areas include the following areas and ecosystems: wetlands, areas with a critical recharging effect on aquifers used for potable water, fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas, frequently flooded areas, and geologically hazardous areas. B. The city of Edmonds critical area ordinance, as codified in Chapters 23.40 through 23.90 ECDC (dated May 3, 2016, Ord. 4026 and as amended by Ord. 4106 and Ord. 4127), is herein adopted as a part of this program, except for the specific subsections list below in subsection (C) of this section. All references to the city of Edmonds critical area ordinance in this program are for this specific version. As a result of this incorporation of the Edmonds critical area ordinance, the provisions of Chapters 23.40 through 23.90 ECDC, less the exceptions listed in subsection (C) of this section, shall apply to any use, alteration or development within shoreline jurisdiction whether or not a shoreline permit or written statement of exemption is required. In addition to the critical area regulations in Chapters 23.40 through 23.90 ECDC (Appendix B of this master program), the regulations identified in this section also apply to critical areas within shoreline jurisdiction. Where there are conflicts between the city of Edmonds critical area ordinance and this shoreline master program, provisions of the shoreline master program shall prevail. C. Exceptions. The specific provisions of the critical area ordinance listed below shall not apply to development within shoreline jurisdiction. 1. General Provisions. a. ECDC 23.40.130(D), Monitoring Program. b. ECDC 23.40.210, Variances. 2.. ail a. ECDCz3.50.ntn�):WedaRatings. b. ECDC 23.50.040i Standard Buffer- Widths. e. ECDCc3.��i)(s),Required Measures to Minimize impacts to Wetlands. d. ECDC 23.5A-040(Kr Small, u..,trolegieally iselated Wetlands. -32. Geologically Hazardous Areas. a. ECDC 23.80.040(B)(1) and (2), allowed activities in geologically hazardous areas. D. Development Limitations. 1. All uses, modifications and activities on sites containing marine shorelines, environmentally sensitive areas and/or critical areas must comply with all applicable local, state, and federal laws pertaining to development in these areas unless in conflict with the provisions of this master program. 2. The site must be specifically designed so that hazards from or impact on the environmentally sensitive area and/or critical areas will be mitigated. 3. Mitigation Sequencing. In order to comply with subsection (D)(2) of this section, a shoreline permit applicant or project proponent shall demonstrate all reasonable efforts have been taken to provide sufficient mitigation such that the activity does not have significant adverse impacts. Mitigation shall occur in the following prioritized order: a. Avoiding the impact altogether by not taking a certain action or parts of an action. b. Minimizing impacts by limiting the degree or magnitude of the action and its implementation by using appropriate technology or by taking affirmative steps, such as project redesign, relocation, or timing to avoid or reduce impacts. The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code are current through Ordinance 4112, passed May 15, 2018. Packet Pg. 138 EXHIBIT 1 4.7.a Edmonds Chapter 24.60 SPECIFIC USE POLICIES AND REGULATIONS Page 2/15 c. Rectifying the impact by repairing, rehabilitating, or restoring the affected environment to the historical conditions or the conditions existing at the time of the initiation of the project. d. Reducing or eliminating the impact or hazard over time by preservation and maintenance operations during the life of the action. e. Compensating for the impact by replacing, enhancing, or providing substitute resources or environments. 4. Monitoring Program. Mitigation plans shall include a program for monitoring construction and for assessing a completed project. A protocol shall be included outlining the schedule for site monitoring (for example, monitoring shall occur in years one, two, three, five, seven, and 10 after site construction), and how the monitoring data will be evaluated to determine if the performance standards are being met. A monitoring report shall be submitted as needed to document milestones, successes, problems, and contingency actions of the compensation project. The compensation project shall be monitored for a period necessary to establish that performance standards have been met, but not for a period less than 10 years. 5. Long -Term Protection of Mitigation Sites. The city shall require documentation that a mitigation site has been permanently preserved from future development or alteration that would be inconsistent with the functions of the mitigation. The documentation may include, but is not limited to, a conservation easement, deed restriction or other agreement between the applicant and the owner of a mitigation site. Such documentation shall be recorded with the Snohomish County auditor. �.es�es;,�r- �s:�r�n�e:rs�rsj�sf�se:Ls�rsss. .ers�!� e. Category HL Category H! wetlands are: (i) wetlands with a moderate level of funetions (seoring between 16 and 19 points); (ii) can often be adequately replaeed with a well planned mitigation proj ; and (iii) interdunal wetlands between one tenth and one aere. Wetlands seoring between 16 and 19 poi generally have been disturbed in some ways and are often less diverse or more isolated from other natLffal resourees in the landseape than Category 11 wetlands. Q The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code are current through Ordinance 4112, passed May 15, 2018. Packet Pg. 139 EXHIBIT 1 4.7.a Edmonds Chapter 24.60 SPECIFIC USE POLICIES AND REGULATIONS Page 3/15 Ewr Tz..rr, r Width (in Feet) Based ,... u..T.atat e,.,...,. [Mledand Category-5 64 -r CategoryT 7-5 4AD5 �T 440 22-5 a The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code are current through Ordinance 4112, passed May 15, 2018. Packet Pg. 140 EXHIBIT 1 4.7.a Edmonds Chapter 24.60 SPECIFIC USE POLICIES AND REGULATIONS Page 4/15 c,.ore Buffer Width /:« Feet) Based on [R et and Category�..4 } 5 LLu�'.fbitat OT cn Categefy w• 1�5 MENEENEL— Forested "5 �_ Esttwine 4-50 /bu ff ..ykdth not based on habitat s Fe\ �22e 7-5 )95 4§55 Category r T«..,7tmal . etl,.«, s te ii5 Category IT -,.«:«e 4-W / 1... FF «.. :.7t1. not 1.....e.7 on l...l.it..t - «e\ on Category 60 ) 95 5 5 Categery A' 1"I 40 The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code are current through Ordinance 4112, passed May 15, 2018. Packet Pg. 141 EXHIBIT 1 4.7.a Edmonds Page 5115 Chapter 24.60 SPECIFIC USE POLICIES AND REGULATIONS Dtist I Use be��ge en4 praefieesto� �l lost lost' qw BUffleF Width (in Feet) Based on Habitat SC;OF am7efland Catego -7 EE. Geologically Hazardous Areas. Development in designated geologically hazardous areas shall be regulated in accordance with the following: 1. New development or the creation of lots should not be allowed that would cause foreseeable risk from geological conditions to people or improvements during the life of the development. 2. New development should not be allowed that would require structural shoreline stabilization over the normal, useful life of the development. Exception may be made for instances where stabilization is necessary to protect allowed uses where no alternative locations are available and no net loss of ecological functions will result. The stabilization measures shall conform to ECDC 24.50.020, Shoreline stabilization. 3. Where no alternatives, including relocation or reconstruction of existing structures, are found to be feasible, and less expensive than the proposed stabilization measure, stabilization structures or measures to protect existing primary residential structures may be all in conformance with ECDC 24.50.020 requirements and then only if no net loss of ecological functions will result. The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code are current through Ordinance 4112, passed May 15, 2018. Packet Pg. 142 EXHIBIT 1 Edmonds Chapter 24.60 SPECIFIC USE POLICIES AND REGULATIONS GF. Critical Saltwater Habitats. Page 6/15 1. Development shall not intrude into or over critical saltwater habitats except when all of the conditions below are met: a. The public's need for such an action or structure is clearly demonstrated and the proposal is consistent with protection of the public trust, as embodied in RCW 90.58.020. b. Avoidance of impacts to critical saltwater habitats by an alternative alignment or location is not feasible or would result in unreasonable and disproportionate cost to accomplish the same general purpose. c. The project, including any required mitigation, will result in no net loss of ecological functions associated with critical saltwater habitat. d. The project is consistent with the state's interest in resource protection and species recovery. 2. Private, noncommercial docks for individual residential or community use may be allowed; provided, that: a. Avoidance of impacts to critical saltwater habitats by an alternative alignment or location is not feasible; b. The project, including any required mitigation, will result in no net loss of ecological functions associated with critical saltwater habitat. 3. Where inventory of critical saltwater habitat has not been completed, all overwater and nearshore developments in marine and estuarine waters shall be required to conduct a habitat assessment of the site and adjacent beach sections to assess the presence of critical saltwater habitats and functions. 14G. Critical Freshwater Habitats. Existing hydrological connections into and between water bodies, such as streams and wetlands, shall be maintained. Obstructed channels shall be reestablished as a condition of non -water -dependent uses, where feasible. 1=H. Additional Authority. In addition to any other authority the city may have, the city is hereby authorized to condition or deny a proposed use, modification or activity or to require site redesign because of hazards associated with the use, modification or activity on or near an environmentally sensitive and/or critical area, and/or the effect of the proposal on the environmentally sensitive area and/or critical area. [Ord. 4072 § 1 (Att. A), 2017]. The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code are current through Ordinance 4112, passed May 15, 2018. Packet Pg. 143 EXHIBIT 1 4.7.a Edmonds Chapter 24.70 NONCONFORMING DEVELOPMENT Chapter 24.70 NONCONFORMING DEVELOPMENT Sections: 24.70.000 Purpose. 24.70.010 Nonconforming uses. 24.70.020 Nonconforming development, building and/or structure. 24.70.030 Nonconforming lots. 24.70.040 Nonconforming signs. 24.70.050 Nonconforming local public facilities. Page 7/15 24.70.010 Nonconforming uses. A. Nonconforming uses are shoreline uses which were lawfully established prior to the effective date of the Shoreline Management Act or this master program, or amendments thereto, but which do not conform to present regulations or standards of this master program or policies of the Act. B. A use which is listed as a conditional use but which existed prior to adoption of this master program or any relevant amendment and for which a conditional use permit has not been obtained shall be considered a nonconforming use. A use which is listed as a conditional use but which existed prior to the applicability of this master program to the site and for which a conditional use permit has not been obtained shall be considered a nonconforming use. C. A nonconforming use may continue, unless required to be abated by subsection (D) of this section, but it may not be expanded in any way, including additional lot areas, floor area, height, number of employees, equipment, or hours of operation, except as otherwise provided in ECDC 24.70.050. D. Lapse of Time. 1. If a nonconforming use is discontinued for six consecutive months or for 12 months during any two-year period, any subsequent use shall be conforming. It shall not be necessary to show that the owner of the property intends to abandon such nonconforming use in order for the nonconforming rights to expire. Uses such as agricultural or aquiculture, which vary seasonally, shall be deemed abandoned if the seasonal use is not utilized during one full season consistent with the traditional use. 2. If a nonconforming use ceases because its building is damaged in excess of 75 percent of its replacement cost, the use may be reestablished if, but only if, an application for a building permit which vests as provided in ECDC 19.00.015, et seq., is filed within six -eighteen months of the date such damage occurred. After the application has been filed, only one 180-day extension may be granted. 3. The right of reestablishment of use described in subsection (D)(2) of this section shall not apply if: a. The building or structure was damaged or destroyed due to the unlawful act of the owner or the owner's agent; or b. The building is damaged or destroyed due to the ongoing neglect or gross negligence of the owner or the owner's agent. c. In the event that subsection (D)(3)(a) or (b) of this section applies, the nonconforming use shall be abated if damage exceeds 25 percent of replacement cost. "Replacement cost" shall be determined as proved in ECDC 24.70.020. E. A nonconforming use shall not be changed to another nonconforming use, regardless of the conforming or nonconforming status of the building or structure in which it is housed. [Ord. 4072 § 1 (Att. A), 2017]. The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code are current through Ordinance 4112, passed May 15, 2018. Packet Pg. 144 EXHIBIT 1 Edmonds Page 8/15 Chapter 24.70 NONCONFORMING DEVELOPMENT 24.70.020 Nonconforming development, building and/or structure. A. Nonconforming development means a shoreline development which was lawfully constructed or established prior to the effective date of the Shoreline Management Act or this master program, or amendments thereto, but which does not conform to present regulations or standards of the program. B. A nonconforming building is one which once met bulk zoning standards and the site development standards applicable to its construction, but which no longer conforms to such standards due to the enactment or amendment of the zoning ordinance of the city of Edmonds or the application of such ordinance in the case of a structure annexed to the city. Subject to the other provisions of this section, an accessory building that is not an accessory dwelling unit shall be presumptively nonconforming if photographic or other substantial evidence conclusively demonstrates that the accessory building existed on or before January 1, 1981. In the case of a property that was annexed after January 1, 1981, then the date shall be that of the effective date of the annexation of the city of Edmonds. Such presumption may be overcome only by clear and convincing evidence. C. A structure for which a variance has been issued shall be considered a legal nonconforming structure and the requirements of this section shall apply as they apply to preexisting nonconformities. D. A nonconforming development, building and/or structure which is moved any distance must be brought as closely as practicable into conformance with this master program. E. Nonconforming development, building and/or structure may be maintained and continued, unless required to be abated elsewhere in this chapter or section; provided, that it is not enlarged, intensified, increased, or altered in any way which increases its nonconformity except as expressly provided in subsections (F) though (L) of this section. F. Historic Buildings and Structures. Nothing in this section shall prevent the full restoration by reconstruction of a building or structure which is either listed on the National Register of Historic Places, the Washington State Register of Historic Places, the Washington State Cultural Resource Inventory, or the Edmonds register of historic places, or is listed in a council approved historical survey meeting the standards of the State Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation. "Restoration" means reconstruction of the historic building or structure with as nearly the same visual design appearance and materials as is consistent with full compliance with the State Building Code and consistent with the requirements of Chapter 20.45 ECDC, Edmonds Register of Historic Places. The reconstruction of all such historic buildings and structures shall comply with the life safety provisions of the State Building Code. G. If a nonconforming development, building and/or structure is destroyed or damaged to an extent not exceeding 75 percent replacement cost at the time of destruction, it may be restored to its former size, shape and lot location as existing immediately prior to the time the structure was damaged, so long as restoration is either: 1. Completed within one year of the date of damage; or 2. Completed within one year of the date of issuance of all required permits, so long as applications for such permits are vested within si*-eiehteen months of the date of damage and are pursued in a timely manner. H. Determination of replacement costs and the level of destruction shall be made by the building official and shall be appealable as Type II staff decision under the provisions of Chapter 20.06 ECDC. I. The right of restoration described in subsection (E) of this section shall not apply if: 1. The development, building and/or structure was damaged or destroyed due to the unlawful act of the owner or the owner's agent; or 2. The development, building and/or structure is damaged or destroyed due to the ongoing neglect or gross negligence of the owner or the owner's agents. J. Residential Buildings in Commercial Zones. Existing nonconforming buildings in commercial zones in use solely for residential purposes, or structures attendant to such residential use, may be remodeled or reconstructed without regard to the limitations of subsections (D), (E) and (G) of this section, if, but only if, the following conditions are met: The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code are current through Ordinance 4112, passed May 15, 2018. Packet Pg. 145 EXHIBIT 1 4.7.a Edmonds Page 9/15 Chapter 24.70 NONCONFORMING DEVELOPMENT 1. The remodel or reconstruction takes place within the footprint of the original building or structure. "Footprint" shall mean an area equal to the smallest rectangular area in a plane parallel to the ground in which the existing building could be placed, exclusive of uncovered decks, steps, porches, and similar features; and provided, that the new footprint of the building or structure shall not be expanded by more than 10 percent and is found by the city staff to be substantially similar to the original style and construction after complying with current codes. 2. All provisions of the State Building and Electrical Codes can be complied with entirely on the site. No nonconforming residential building may be remodeled or reconstructed if, by so doing, the full use under state law or city ordinance of a conforming neighboring lot or building would be limited by such remodel or reconstruction. 3. These provisions shall apply only to the primary residential use on site and shall not apply to nonconforming accessory buildings or structures. 4. A nonconforming residential single-family building may be rebuilt within the defined building envelope if it is rebuilt with materials and design which are substantially similar to the original style and structure after complying with current codes. "Substantial compliance" shall be determined by the city as a Type II staff decision, except that any appeal of the staff decision shall be to the ADB rather than the hearing examiner. The decision of the ADB shall be final and appealable only as provided in ECDC 20.07.006. K. Subject to the other provisions of this section, an accessory building that is not an accessory dwelling unit shall be presumptively nonconforming if photographic or other substantial evidence conclusively demonstrates that the accessory building existed on or before January 1, 1981. In the case of a property that was annexed after January 1, 1981, then the date shall be that of the effective date of the annexation to the city of Edmonds. Such presumption may be overcome only by clear and convincing evidence. L. B135 Zone. The B135 zone was created in part to encourage the adoption and reuse of existing residential structures for live/work and commercial use as set forth in ECDC 16.43.030(B)(5). In the BD5 zone, conforming and nonconforming buildings may be converted to commercial or other uses permitted by ECDC 16.43.020 and this master program without being required to come into compliance with the ground floor elevation requirements of ECDC 16.43.030(B). [Ord. 4072 § 1 (Att. A), 2017]. The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code are current through Ordinance 4112, passed May 15, 2018. Packet Pg. 146 EXHIBIT 1 Page 10115 Chapter 24.80 ADMINISTRATION — SHORELINE PERMITS Sections: 24.80.000 Purpose. 24.80.010 Exemptions from shoreline substantial development permit process. 24.80.020 Letter of exemption. 24.80.025 Developments not required to obtain shoreline permits or local reviews. 24.80.030 Review criteria for all development. 24.80.040 Substantial development permit criteria. 24.80.050 Conditional use permit criteria. 24.80.060 Variance permit criteria. 24.80.070 Minimum application requirements. 24.80.080 Notice of application. 24.80.090 Special procedures for limited utility extensions and bulkheads. 24.80.095 Shoreline restoration projects — Relief from shoreline master program development standards and use reeulations 24.80.100 Public hearings. 24.80.105 Special procedures for WSDOT projects. 24.80.110 Notice of decision, reconsideration, and appeals. 24.80.120 Initiation of development. 24.80.130 Revisions. 24.80.140 Time requirements of shoreline permits. 24.80.150 Administrative authority and responsibility. 24.80.160 Compliance. 24.80.170 Enforcement. 24.80.010 Exemptions from shoreline substantial development permit process. A. Application and Interpretation. 1. Exemptions shall be construed narrowly. Only those developments that meet the precise terms of one or more of the listed exemptions may be granted exemption from the substantial development permit process. 2. An exemption from the substantial development permit process is not an exemption from compliance with the Shoreline Management Act or the city of Edmonds shoreline master program, or from any other regulatory requirements. To be authorized, all uses and developments must be consistent with the policies and provisions of this master program and the Shoreline Management Act. 3. When a development or use is proposed that does not comply with the bulk, dimensional and performance standards of the master program, such development or use can only be authorized by approval of a variance. 4. A development or use that is listed as a conditional use pursuant to this master program, or is an unlisted use, must obtain a conditional use permit even though the development or use does not require a substantial development permit. 5. The burden of proof that a development or use is exempt from the permit process is on the applicant. 6. If any part of a proposed development is not eligible for exemption, then a substantial development permit is required for the entire proposed development project. 7. The city of Edmonds may attach conditions to the approval of exempted developments and/or uses as necessary to assure consistency of the project with the Shoreline Management Act and this master program. B. Exemptions Listed. The following developments shall not require substantial development permits: The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code are current through Ordinance 4112, passed May 15, 2018. Packet Pg. 147 EXHIBIT 1 Page 11115 4.7.a 1. Any development of which the total cost or fair market value, whichever is higher, does not exceed $5-,7U7,047, if such development does not materially interfere with the normal public use of the water or shorelines of the state. The dollar threshold established in this subsection must be adjusted for inflation every five years consistent with WAC 173-27-040(2)(a). For purposes of determining whether or not a permit is required, the total cost or fair market value shall be based on the value of development that is occurring on shorelines of the state as defined in RCW 90.58.030(2)(c). The total cost or fair market value of the development shall include the fair market value of any donated, contributed or found labor, equipment or materials. 2. Normal maintenance or repair of existing structures or developments, including damage by accident, fire or elements. "Normal maintenance" includes those usual acts to prevent a decline, lapse, or cessation from a lawfully established condition. "Normal repair" means to restore a development to a state comparable to its original condition, including but not limited to its size, shape, configuration, location and external appearance, within a reasonable period after decay or partial destruction, except where repair causes substantial adverse effects to shoreline resource or environment. Replacement of a structure or development may be authorized as repair where such replacement is the common method of repair for the type of structure or development and the replacement structure or development is comparable to the original structure or development including but not limited to its size, shape, configuration, location and external appearance and the replacement does not cause substantial adverse effects to shoreline resources or environment. 3. Construction of the normal protective bulkhead common to single-family residences. A "normal protective" bulkhead includes those structural and nonstructural developments installed at or near, and parallel to, the ordinary high water mark for the sole purpose of protecting an existing single-family residence and appurtenant structures from loss or damage by erosion. A normal protective bulkhead is not exempt if constructed for the purpose of creating dry land. When a vertical or near vertical wall is being constructed or reconstructed, not more than one cubic yard of fill per one foot of wall may be used as backfill. When an existing bulkhead is being repaired by construction of a vertical wall fronting the existing wall, it shall be constructed no further waterward of the existing bulkhead than is necessary for construction of new footings. When a bulkhead has deteriorated such that an ordinary high water mark has been established by the presence and action of water landward of the bulkhead then the replacement bulkhead must be located at or near the actual ordinary high water mark. Beach nourishment and bioengineered erosion control projects may be considered a normal protective bulkhead when any structural elements are consistent with the above requirements and when the project has been approved by the Department of Fish and Wildlife. 4. Emergency construction necessary to protect property from damage by the elements. An "emergency" is an unanticipated and imminent threat to public health, safety, or the environment which requires immediate action within a time too short to allow full compliance with this chapter. Emergency construction does not include development of new permanent protective structures where none previously existed. Where new protective structures are deemed by the administrator to be the appropriate means to address the emergency situation, upon abatement of the emergency situation the new structure shall be removed or any permit which would have been required, absent an emergency, pursuant to Chapter 90.58 RCW, these regulations, or the local master program, obtained. All emergency construction shall be consistent with the policies of Chapter 90.58 RCW and the local master program. As a general matter, flooding or other seasonal events that can be anticipated and may occur but that are not imminent are not an emergency. 5. Construction or modification of navigational aids such as channel markers and anchor buoys. 6. Construction on shorelands by an owner, lessee or contract purchaser of a single-family residence for their own use or for the use of their family, which residence does not exceed a height of 25 feet above average grade level and which meets all requirements of the state agency or local government having jurisdiction thereof, other than requirements imposed pursuant to Chapter 90.58 RCW. "Single-family residence" means a detached dwelling designed for and occupied by one family including those structures and developments within a contiguous ownership which are a normal appurtenance as defined in ECDC 24.90.010(F). Construction authorized under this exemption shall be located landward of the ordinary high water mark. 7. Construction of a dock, including a community dock, designed for pleasure craft only, for the private noncommercial use of the owner, lessee, or contract purchaser of single-family and multiple -family residences. The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code are current through Ordinance 4112, passed May 15, 2018. Packet Pg. 148 EXHIBIT 1 Page 12/15 A dock is a landing and moorage facility for watercraft and does not include recreational decks, storage facilities or other appurtenances. This exception applies if either: a. In salt waters (Puget Sound), the fair market value of the dock does not exceed $2,500; or b. In fresh waters (Lake Ballinger) the fair market value of the dock does not exceed: (A) twent. thousand five hundred dollars for docks that are constructed to replace existing docks, are of equal or lesser square footage than the existing dock being replaced; or (B) $10,000eleven thousand two hundred dollars for all other docks constructed in fresh waters., but -However, if subsequent construction fair- ma fLotyalt e exceeding $2 500 occurs within five years of completion of the prior construction, and the combined fair market value of the subsequent and prior construction exceeds the amount specified above, the subsequent construction shall be considered a substantial development for the purpose of this chapter. 8. Operation, maintenance, or construction of canals, waterways, drains, reservoirs, or other facilities that now exist or are hereafter created or developed as a part of an irrigation system for the primary purpose of making use of system waters, including return flow and artificially stored ground water from the irrigation of lands. 9. The marking of property lines or corners on state-owned lands, when such marking does not significantly interfere with normal public use of the surface of the water. 10. Operation and maintenance of any system of dikes, ditches, drains, or other similar drainage or utility facilities existing on September 8, 1975, which were created, developed or utilized primarily as a part of an agricultural drainage or diking system. 11. Any project with a certification from the governor pursuant to Chapter 80.50 RCW. 12. Site exploration and investigation activities that are prerequisite to preparation of an application for development authorization under this chapter, if. a. The activity does not interfere with the normal public use of the surface waters; b. The activity will have no significant adverse impact on the environment including but not limited to fish, wildlife, fish or wildlife habitat, water quality, and aesthetic values; c. The activity does not involve the installation of any structure, and upon completion of the activity the vegetation and land configuration of the site are restored to conditions existing before the activity; d. A private entity seeking development authorization under this section first posts a performance bond or provides other evidence of financial responsibility to the local jurisdiction to ensure that the site is restored to preexisting conditions; and e. The activity is not subject to the permit requirements of RCW 90.58.550. 13. The process of removing or controlling aquatic noxious weeds, as defined in RCW 17.26.020, through the use of an herbicide or other treatment methods applicable to weed control that are recommended by a final environmental impact statement published by the Department of Agriculture or the Department of Ecology jointly with other state agencies under Chapter 43.21C RCW. 14. Watershed restoration projects as defined in WAC 173-27-040(2)(o). The administrator shall review the projects for consistency with the shoreline master program in an expeditious manner and shall issue its decision along with any conditions within 45 days of receiving all materials necessary to review the request for exemption from the applicant. No fee may be charged for accepting and processing requests for exemption for watershed restoration projects as used in this section. 15. Consistent with WAC 173-27-040, a public or private project designed to improve fish or wildlife habitat or fish passage, that conforms to the provisions of RCW 77.55.181. ^ —L E . - ate „ eet that is designed*� fish of �A41dlife habitat of f4sh passage, when The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code are current through Ordinance 4112, passed May 15, 2018. Packet Pg. 149 EXHIBIT 1 Page 13/15 a. The project has been approved in vffiting by the Department of Fish and Wildlife; rt,apter 77.55 n CIAI; and The has deter that the is the local eivy -mined project substantially eonsisten4 with shoreline master- program.e. The determination in timely it by letter to the .-. N city shall make such a manner and provide q1t, V [Ord. 4072 § 1 (Att. A), 2017]. c 16. The external or internal retrofitting of an existing structure with the exclusive purpose of compliance with Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. Sec. 12101 et seq.) or to otherwise provide physical access O to the structure by individuals with disabilities. a) 24.80.025 Developments not required to obtain shoreline permits or local reviews 0 Requirements to obtain a substantial development permit, conditional use permit, variance, letter of exemption, or other review to implement the Shoreline Management Act do not apply to the following; a E A. Remedial actions. Pursuant to RCW 90.58.355, any�erson conducting a remedial action at a facility pursuant L co to a consent decree, order, or agreed order issued pursuant to Chapter 70.1051) RCW, or to the Department of o Ecology when it conducts a remedial action under Chapter 70.105D RCW. (L L d B. Boatyard improvements to meet NPDES permit requirements. Pursuant to RCW 90.58.355, M person cNo installingsite 'te improvements for storm water treatment in an existing boatyard facility to meet requirements of a � national pollutant discharge elimination system storm water general permit. c L C. WSDOT facility maintenance and safety improvements. Pursuant to RCW 90.58.356, Washington State 0 Department of Transportation projects and activities meeting the conditions of RCW 90.58.356 are not required to W obtain a substantial development permit, conditional use permit, variance, letter of exemption, or other local review. c D. Projects consistent with an environmental excellence program agreement pursuant to RCW 90.58.045. EL E. Projects authorized through the Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council process, pursuant to Chapter 80.50 O RCW. c 0. 0 a 24.80.095 Shoreline restoration proiects—Relief from shoreline master program development standards 3 and use regulations. The city may grant relief from shoreline master program development standards and use regulations resulting from a) shoreline restoration projects within urban growth areas consistent with criteria and procedures in WAC 173-27-215. U 24.80.100 Public hearings. A. The administrator shall determine whether an application requires a public hearing pursuant to the criteria below a no later than 15 days after the minimum public comment period provided by ECDC 24.80.080(B). An open record public hearing shall be required for all of the following: y 1. One interested has to the 15 days the final c or more per -sons submitted administrator, within of publication d � o 21. The proposal is determined to have a significant adverse impact on the environment and an environmental a impact statement is required in accordance with the State Environmental Policy Act; or -32. The proposal requires a variance and/or conditional use approval pursuant to this master program; or The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code are current through Ordinance 4112, passed May 15, 2018. Packet Pg. 150 EXHIBIT 1 Page 14/15 34. The use or development requires an open record public hearing for other city of Edmonds approvals or permits, or . [Ord. 4072 § 1 (Att. A), 2017]. 4. The city receives a request from any interested person within 14 days of the date of the notice of application and the public hearing request is accompanied by a hearing fee, to be paid by the persons requesting the hearing, in the amount of 50 percent of the difference between the Type II and Type III application fee. B. When a public hearingis s triggered pursuant to subsection A.4 of this section, the project applicant shall pay the other 50 percent of the difference between the Type 11 and Type III application fee, on top of the previously paid Type II application fee. The applicant shall pay this fee within 30 days of notice from the city that the fee is due. If the applicant fails to pay the additional fee within the required 30-dayperiod, the application for the project shall be deemed withdrawn. The city shall not schedule the public hearing until the additional fee has been paid. For these Dublic hearings. the cost of the hearing examiner shall be borne by the citv. 24.80.105 Special procedures for WSDOT proiects. A. Permit review time for projects on a state highway. Pursuant to RCW 47.01.485, the Legislature established a target of 90 days review time for local governments. B. Optional process allowing construction to commence twenty-one days after date of filing. Pursuant to RCW 90.58.140, Washington State Department of Transportation projects that address significant public safety risks may begin twenty-one days after the date of filing if all components of the project will achieve no net loss of shoreline ecological functions. 24.80.150 Administrative authority and responsibility. A. Shoreline Administrator. The shoreline administrator shall be the planning manager or his/her designee and is vested with the following authority and responsibility to: 1. Have overall administrative responsibility for this master program; 2. Determine if a public hearing should be held on a shoreline permit application by the hearing examiner pursuant to ECDC 24.80.100; 3. Grant or deny written permit exemptions from shoreline substantial development permit requirements of this master program; 4. Authorize, approve or deny shoreline substantial development permits, except for those for which a public hearing is required pursuant to ECDC 24.80.100; 5. Make written recommendation to the hearing examiner or city council as appropriate and insofar as possible, in order to assure that all relevant information, testimony, and questions regarding a specific matter are made available during their respective reviews of such matter; 6. Review and evaluate the records of project review actions (permits and exemptions) in shoreline areas and report on the cumulative effects of authorized development of shoreline conditions at a minimum every s� eight years when this master program is updated. The administrator shall coordinate such review with the Washington State Department of Ecology, Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife, and other interested parties; 7. Advise interested citizens and project proponents of the goals, policies, regulations and procedures of this master program; and 8. Make administrative decisions and interpretations of the policies and regulations of this master program and the Shoreline Management Act. B. Hearing Examiner. The hearing examiner is vested with the following authority: 1. To grant or deny shoreline substantial development permits requiring public hearings pursuant to ECDC 24.80.100; The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code are current through Ordinance 4112, passed May 15, 2018. Packet Pg. 151 EXHIBIT 1 Page 15115 4.7.a 2. To grant or deny shoreline conditional use permits under this master program; 3. To grant or deny variances from this master program; and 4. To decide on appeals of administrative decisions issued by the administrator of this master program in accord with procedures set forth in ECDC Title 20. C. City Council. 1. The Edmonds city council is vested with the authority to approve any revisions or amendments to this master program in accordance with the applicable requirements of the Shoreline Management Act and the Washington Administrative Code. 2. To become effective any amendment to this master program must be reviewed and adopted by the Department of Ecology pursuant to RCW 90.58.190 and Chapter 173-26 WAC. [Ord. 4072 § 1 (Att. A), 2017] 3. The City Council will conduct the periodic review process consistent with the requirements of RCW 90.58.080 and WAC 173-26-090. 24.90.020 Definitions — C to F. I. "Development" means a use consisting of the construction or exterior alteration of structures; dredging; drilling; dumping; grading; filling; removal of any sand, gravel, or minerals; bulk heading; driving of piling; placing of obstructions; or any project of a permanent or temporary nature which interferes with the normal public use of the surface of the waters overlying lands subject to the act at any stage of water level. "Development" does not include dismantling or removing structures if there is no other associated development or re -development. GG. "Floodway" means the area that has been established in effective Federal Emergency Management Agency flood insurance rate maps or floodway maps. The floodway does not include lands that can reasonably be expected to be protected from flood waters by flood control devices maintained by or maintained under license from the federal government, the state, or a political division of the state. The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code are current through Ordinance 4112, passed May 15, 2018. Packet Pg. 152 Exhibit 2 4.7.a Wi-,,O/wardLLC environmental 200 West Mercer St. • Suite 401 • Seattle, WA 98119 Phone: 206.378.1364 • Fax: 206.973.3048 • www.windwardenv.com MEMORANDUM To: Michael Nelson, Diane Buckshnis, Kristiana Johnson, Shane Hope, Kernen Lien, and Maureen Judge, City of Edmonds From: Jennifer Love and Ron Gouguet Subject: Description of Edmonds Marsh for inclusion in the 2019 Shoreline Master Program periodic review Date: April 18, 2019 INTRODUCTION The Edmonds Marsh (Marsh) is a tidally influenced' wetland occupying approximately 27 acres in the heart of Edmonds, Washington (Figure 1); it is the remnant of a much larger estuarine wetland that was once located along the shores of Puget Sound (Sea - Run Consulting et al. 2007). Historically, the Marsh was a pocket estuary more than 100 acres in size and protected by a barrier sand spit (Shannon & Wilson 2015). It extended from Point Edmonds (located at the southern end of Marina Beach Park) north to Brackett's Landing near the Washington State Department of Transportation ferry terminal. The purpose of this memorandum is to provide updated information regarding the Marsh, its tributary creeks, and Shellabarger Marsh to be included with the 2019 Shoreline Master Program (SMP) periodic review. A great deal of data and other information has been collected regarding the Marsh and its tributary creeks since 2007, when the last shoreline inventory and characterization document was published (Sea - Run Consulting et al.). The western portion of the Marsh contains mudflat habitat and tidal channels and supports saltmarsh plants (Figure 2). This area is understood to be brackish in the winter months, when the tide gate downstream of the Marsh typically is closed, and saline in the spring and summer months, when the tide gate typically is open (Sea -Run 1 The Marsh is tidally influenced when the tide gate downstream of the Marsh is open, typically in the spring and summer months (April through September) (Sea -Run Consulting et al. 2007). Packet Pg. 153 Exhibit 2 4.7.a Edmonds Marsh Description for 2019 SMP Update April 18, 2019 Page 2 Consulting et al. 2007). The eastern portion of the Marsh is a predominantly freshwater system fed by two tributary creeks —Willow Creek and Shellabarger Creek (Figure 1). Shellabarger Marsh is an approximately 5-acre freshwater wetland located on the east side of State Route (SR)104 (Figure 1). It was once part of the Marsh, but the two areas were separated when SR 104 was constructed. The two marshes are still hydraulically connected via a pair of culverts that run under SR-104 (Sea -Run Consulting et al. 2007) Both marshes provide valuable habitat to birds and other wildlife, in addition to conveying large quantities of stormwater and surface water. The Marsh is connected to Puget Sound via Willow Creek, which currently flows out of the Marsh into an approximately 2,200-ft-long system of ditches, pipes, culverts, and flood gate infrastructure prior to discharging into Puget Sound via a submerged outfall. The City of Edmonds (City) plans to daylight (i.e., bring aboveground) Willow Creek, a project that will improve hydraulic and habitat connectivity between the Marsh and Puget Sound (Shannon & Wilson 2015). As the Marsh is the only remaining salt marsh within the nearshore habitat zone of Watershed Resources Inventory Area (WRIA) 8 (the Lake Washington/ Cedar/ Sammamish Watershed), daylighting Willow Creek is ranked as a high priority restoration project (SRFB 2014, 2018). SITE SETTING AND DRAINAGE BASIN The Marsh is surrounded by commercial development, as well as transportation rights -of -way (ROWs) and a former (now vacant) industrial site. The Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) railroad ROW runs northeast to southwest along the western boundary of the Marsh, and SR 104 runs north to south along the eastern boundary of the Marsh, as shown on Figure 1. The Port of Edmonds's Harbor Square property, which contains buildings, paved areas, and recreational facilities (e.g., tennis courts and a paved trail), is adjacent the Marsh to the north. Two properties are adjacent to the Marsh to the south: the Willow Creek Fish Hatchery (Hatchery) property, which is owned by the City, and a former bulk fuel terminal known as the Unocal property, which is owned by the Chevron Corporation (Chevron). Shellabarger Marsh is surrounded primarily by residential developments, both single-family homes and apartment and condominium buildings (Figure 1). The drainage basin of Willow Creek is approximately 393 acres in size and encompasses residential land to the south and east of the Marsh (Shannon & Wilson 2015; SAIC and Herrera 2013). Willow Creek enters the Marsh as two separate branches, flowing into the southeastern side of the Marsh via the Hatchery property (Figure 1). The drainage basin of Shellabarger Creek is approximately 378 acres in size and encompasses dense residential developments to the north, east, and south of the Marsh (SAIC and Herrera 2013). Shellabarger Creek flows through Shellabarger Marsh and other privately owned residential properties to the south of Shellabarger Marsh before passing through the SR 104 culverts into the Marsh. Upon exiting the culverts, Shellabarger Creek flows in an unconfined path (i.e., it is not contained within a distinct channel) through the dense Marsh vegetation (predominantly cattails [Typha latifolia]). Including the two creeks and Tin ward en�iranmentaf LLC Packet Pg. 154 Exhibit 2 4.7.a Edmonds Marsh Description for 2019 SMP Update April 18, 2019 Page 3 other areas that discharge surface water to the Marsh, the drainage basin of the Marsh is approximately 900 acres in size. Other smaller areas also contribute surface water flows to the Marsh. Stormwater enters the Marsh from the Harbor Square property and Dayton Street via two stormwater outfalls on the northern edge of the Marsh (Figure 1). After exiting the outfalls, the stormwater flows into patches of cattail and other emergent vegetation at the Marsh perimeter. Stormwater from a portion of SR 104 also discharges directly to the eastern portion of the Marsh. Water flowing out of the Marsh enters the lower, channelized portion of Willow Creek. Just downstream of the primary tidal channel of the Marsh, Willow Creek makes a sharp turn to the south and runs through a 600-ft-long open ditch parallel to and alongside the BNSF railroad tracks (Shannon & Wilson 2015) (Figure 1). The creek then flows into double culverts that run underneath the railroad tracks before entering a 1,600-ft-long series of underground pipes and other drainage infrastructure, including a tide gate (Shannon & Wilson 2015). The tide gate is made of steel and has a top -hinged flap gate within a large storm drain vault. It is chained open in spring and summer (from March until October), allowing tidal flow into the Marsh. It is closed in fall and winter (from October until March), although it is not totally watertight when closed. After passing through the underground drainage system, Willow Creek discharges to the Puget Sound via a submerged outfall located approximately 200 ft offshore from Marina Beach Park (Shannon & Wilson 2015). The current drainage system through which Willow Creek passes prior to discharging to the Puget Sound limits both tidal flow and fish passage into and out of the Marsh and its tributary creeks (Shannon & Wilson 2015). Even with the existing tide gate open, tidal flow into the portion of Willow Creek adjacent to the Unocal property detention basin is muted (i.e., reduced) by 1 to 2 ft of elevation owing to the seaward pipes and other drainage infrastructure that Willow Creek passes through before connecting to Puget Sound. The City is planning the Edmonds Marsh Estuary Restoration Project in order to daylight the portion of Willow Creek downstream of the Marsh and conduct other habitat restoration activities within the Marsh. The project would restore a more natural, aboveground creek channel in this portion of Willow Creek, removing the creek from the subsurface pipes, culverts, and other drainage infrastructure through which it currently flows. Ultimately the creek would flow to the Puget Sound by way of Marina Beach Park (Shannon & Wilson 2015, 2017). The project would also include the excavation of channels through the Marsh in order to improve the flow of Shellabarger and Willow Creeks downstream of the SR 104 culverts and through the eastern portion of the Marsh, re-establish connections between Willow and Shellabarger Creeks, and increase the extent of saltwater influence within the Marsh. Extending saltwater influence would allow native salt marsh vegetation to re -occupy some of the areas that W� ward environmenwl LLC Packet Pg. 155 Exhibit 2 4.7.a Edmonds Marsh Description for 2019 SMP Update April 18, 2019 Page 4 are currently dominated by cattail, and opening up the creek channels would allow fish to access the stream habitat (Shannon & Wilson 2015). MARSH HABITAT AND WILDLIFE The US Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Internet soil survey lists Mukilteo muck as the dominant soil type within the Marsh (USDA 2011). Mukilteo muck is typically found in depressions, and its parent material is herbaceous organic material. It is very poorly drained soil with a moderately high to high capacity to transmit water. The NRCS rates Mukilteo muck as hydric. Minor soil types are also present on the margins of the Marsh, including Alderwood- Everett gravelly sandy loams and Everett very gravelly sandy loam. Urban land, consisting of level areas where structures and altered soils are present, is also present on the Marsh's margins. Alderwood-Everett and Everett soil types are found on terraces and outwash plains formed by glacial outwash. These soil types drain moderately well, and their surface layer is gravelly sandy loam. As part of a baseline study being conducted within the Marsh in 2018 and 2019, water depth and salinity data are being collected from several monitoring stations within the Marsh using conductivity, temperature, and depth (CTD) recorders. An additional CTD recorder is being used in the fenced basin west of the BNSF tracks, which receives outflow from the Marsh and Willow Creek. CTD data from July 17, 2018 through March 7, 2019, are currently available; the network of CTD recorders will be maintained for a total of one year as part of the baseline study. To date, salinity within the Marsh has typically ranged from 0 to 25 parts per thousand (ppt).2 Absolute tide (referenced to the geoid) will be calculated after a real-time kinematic (RTK) GPS survey is completed toward the end of the baseline monitoring period. Vegetation in the eastern portion of the Marsh is dominated by cattail, with some patches of alder and willow intermixed (Figure 2). The western portion of the Marsh contains tidal channels, mudflat habitat, and a greater diversity of Marsh plants, several of which are salt -tolerant, such as pickleweed (Salicornia depressa), saltgrass (Distichlis spicata), cosmopolitan bulrush (Bolboschoenus maritimus), and seaside arrowgrass (Triglochin maritima). Figure 2 shows the existing boundary between the cattail - dominated eastern portion of the Marsh and the western portion, which is tidally influenced. 2 In 1978, the Practical Salinity Scale, which uses a ratio of measured conductivity to the conductivity of a standard potassium chlorine solution to determine salinity, was adopted by oceanographers (Thermo Scientific 2011). This scale is referred to as PSS-78 and has no units, as it measures ratios, but it does report salinity in "practical salinity units' (psu). One psu is virtually equivalent to 1 ppt, and salinity is often still reported in ppt. The salinity measurements being taken in the Marsh are calculated from conductivity and temperature in psu but are reported herein as ppt for comparison with regulatory standards. wig ward en�iranmentaf LLC Packet Pg. 156 Exhibit 2 Edmonds Marsh Description for 2019 SMP Update April 18, 2019 Page 5 A diverse mix of both native and non-native vegetation is also present within the Marsh's buffer areas. Native species observed along the northern portion of the Marsh within the Harbor Square property include Pacific willow (Salix lucida ssp. lasiandra), Scouler's willow (Salix scouleriana), red alder (Alnus rubra), paper birch (Betula papyrifera), western red cedar (Thuja plicata) seedlings, common snowberry (Symphoricarpos albus), red -flowering currant (gibes sanguineum), and red -osier dogwood (Cornus sericea), among other species. The diversity of native plants in this area has been enhanced by recent restoration efforts. Invasive species, including reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea) and Himalayan blackberry (Rubus armeniacus), are also present, as are ornamental plantings along the northern side of the paved pedestrian path. The Hatchery property contains relatively high -quality, forested upland and wetland habitat with a diversity of native species, including red alder, bigleaf maple (Acer macrophyllum), Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga douglasii), western red cedar, and western hemlock (Tsuga heterophylla). The understory contains a variety of native shrub and ground cover species, including salmonberry (Rubus spectabilis), osoberry (Oemleria cerasiformis), red -osier dogwood, red -flowering currant, vine maple (Acer circinatum), western red cedar seedlings and saplings, red elderberry (Sambucus racemosa), stink currant (Ribes bracteosum), lady fern (Athyrium filix femina), fringecup (Tellima grandiflora), youth -on -age (Tolmiea menziesii), lily -of -the -valley (Convallaria majalis), western bleeding heart (Dicentra formosa), and a good number of skunk cabbages (Lysichitum americanum) beneath the tree canopy along Willow Creek. Invasive species, including Himalayan blackberry, English ivy (Hendra helix) and a few scattered seedlings of English holly (Ilex aquifolium), have also been observed within the Hatchery property, but for the most part these exist in sparse and non -dominant patches. A very dense patch of bittersweet nightshade (Solanum dulcamara) is present near the transition from the forested wetland habitat of the Hatchery to the emergent area of the Marsh interior. Forest vegetation along the southwestern portion of the Marsh, located on the Unocal property, appears to be similar to that of the Hatchery property. Vegetation growing between SR 104 and the Marsh consists of a narrow but dense strip of red alder, Himalayan blackberry, Scotch broom (Cytisus scoparius), and Pacific willow. Near the location where Shellabarger Creek passes through the double culverts to enter the Marsh, cattails extend from the Marsh all the way to the sidewalk along the highway. The invasive species bittersweet nightshade, Himalayan blackberry, and reed canarygrass are also present in this area. The strip of trees and shrubs between the highway and the Marsh widens as it extends south from the Shellabarger Creek culverts. The forest here is a mix of native trees, including red alder, water birch (Betula occidentalis), Douglas fir, bigleaf maple, and western hemlock. Edmonds Marsh and its adjacent buffer areas are home to 190 bird species, including waterfowl, shorebirds, herons, raptors, and passerines (Riddell and Peterson 2016). Eastern cottontail rabbits, coyotes, and deer are some of the mammal species that have been observed in the Marsh and its buffer areas. W� ward environmenwl LLC Packet Pg. 157 Exhibit 2 Edmonds Marsh Description for 2019 SMP Update April 18, 2019 Page 6 While fish are not currently known to use the Marsh's tidal channels, coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch), chum salmon (Oncorhynchus keta), resident and sea -run cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarkii), sculpins, and threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) were observed in Willow Creek historically (Sea -Run Consulting et al. 2007; Shannon & Wilson 2015).3 Prior to the early 2000s (when the Willow Creek outfall pipe was lengthened and submerged deeper into the Puget Sound), small numbers of adult coho salmon were known to return to Willow Creek and migrate into Upper Willow Creek (Shannon & Wilson 2015). After the early 2000s, very small numbers of adult salmon or sea -run cutthroat trout were reportedly able to find the submerged pipe and migrate up into Willow Creek, but none have been observed for the past several years (Shannon & Wilson 2015). In 2008, more than 5,500 threespine stickleback, a pair of prickly sculpin (Cottus asper), and a single starry flounder (Platichthys stellatus) were captured in the lower portion of Willow Creek adjacent to the Unocal property and the BNSF railway line (Arcadis 2010).4 No salmonids were observed in this portion of the creek in 2008. One of the goals of the Willow Creek daylighting project is to promote the use of the Marsh and its tributary creeks by juvenile Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha). Additional data and information regarding the habitat value and other ecological functions provided by the Marsh and its adjacent buffer areas are being collected as part of the Edmonds Marsh Baseline Study. This study started in the summer of 2018 and will continue for one year. Additional information generated by the study will be available in the future to help inform the SMP periodic review process. REFERENCES Arcadis. 2010. Final - Phase II remedial implementation as -built report. Appendix E. Fish relocation, Willow Creek, former Unocal/ Chevron Edmonds terminal site. ARCADIS, Seattle, WA. Riddell C, Peterson T. 2016.190 bird species of Edmonds Marsh. Edmonds, WA. SAIC, Herrera. 2013. Dayton Street and SR 104 storm drainage alternatives study, City of Edmonds. SAIC and Herrera Environmental Consultants. Sea -Run Consulting, Tetra Tech Inc., Reid Middleton Inc., Pentec. 2007. Shoreline master program update. Shoreline inventory & characterization. Prepared for City of Edmonds, Washington. Shannon & Wilson. 2015. Final feasibility study, Willow Creek daylighting, Edmonds, Washington. Shannon & Wilson, Inc., Seattle, WA. 4.7.a 3 Fish were observed within Willow Creek; it is not clear whether they were also observed in the Marsh's tidal channels or in Shellabarger Creek. 4 The fish were captured and removed from this portion of Willow Creek because it was undergoing remediation by Chevron. W� ward environmentA LLC Packet Pg. 158 Exhibit 2 4.7.a Edmonds Marsh Description for 2019 SMP Update April 18, 2019 Page 7 Shannon & Wilson. 2017. Willow Creek daylight project, expanded marsh concept design and hydraulic modeling report. Shannon & Wilson, Inc., Seattle, WA. SRFB. 2014. Lake Washington/ Cedar/ Sammamish Watershed (WRIA 8) project subcommittee report. 2014 grant round - salmon recovery funding board (SRFB) & Puget Sound acquisition and restoration (PSAR). WRIA 8 Salmon Recovery Council, Salmon Recovery Funding Board. SRFB. 2018. Approved 2018 WRIA 8 four-year work plan - capital project and program priorities. Salmon Recovery Funding Board. Thermo Scientific. 2011. Applications tip of the week. Conductivity and salinity. Thermo Scientific. USDA. 2011. Natural Resources Conservation Service soils data interactive map: areas of interest [online]. US Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC. [Cited 4/8/11.] Available from: http: / /websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/WebSoilSurvey.aspx. W� ward environmenwl LLC Packet Pg. 159 Exhibit 2 4.7.a ` 5 :"��f .. (� �.r� ��4 ., k�� //LL/�__ "Y> _ QF -.._ � I1®� ■■ J�'n .. .�c.�w �i��� .- .. N 0 0.1 0.2 Win war Miles environmental LLC 0 500 i,000 Feet Major vegetation transition line F=—] Parcel • Storm culvert � City of Edmonds boundary Storm line — Storm ditch/creek Figure 1. Site setting and stormwater structures Note: Shellabarger and Willow Creeks no longer flow through defined channels in the eastern portion of the marsh; however, their previous flow paths are shown. Packet Pg. 160 Exhibit 2 4.7.a Patch ID No. Species Present Within Patch '. 1 seaside arrowgrass and cosmopolitan bulrush.12 }•' n d * ' 2 brass buttons growing along mudflat perimeter 3 L n b e's sedge cattail and hardstem bulrush; cosmopolitan bulrush growing 4 along mudflat perimeter 5 hardstem bulrush T f ` { - ,�� M f "r '.f 11Jo •' 6 hardstem bulrush 7 common reed © l� �• 8 saltgrass, Pacific silverweed 9 4 saltgrass 10 cosmopolitan bulrush 11 cosmopolitan bulrush, seaside arrowgrass 12 baltic rush, salt rass, Pacific silverweed, meadow barley1 CS•J' i © +�, w'' t 13 Pacific silverweed band Himalayan blackberry - �7-'' narrow of reed canarygrass and 14 along wooden boardwalkk 15 cattail and bittersweet nightshade ' "�r:= .•-'� "rah , �� " -� i •k native shrub buffer (e.g., snowbenroses, red -flowering 16 currant) - planted � , �, ky, Japanese knotweed, hops, reed canarygrass, small -fruited 17 bulrush growingadjacent to boardwalk 18 cosmopolitan bulrush, Pacific silverweed,IL - © r _ s ' } 19 saltgrass P cattail and common reed (common reed in western portion of 20patch)'_r saltgrass, Pacific silverweed, baltic rush, Lyngbye's sedge, 1. ya••' ." r4' _ �' small patch cosmopolitan bulrush, brass buttonsspear 21 saltbush and ickleweed alongmudflat perimeter' -` ^'R 22 spear saltbush, saltgrass 23 spear saltbush, saltgrass, meadow bane O ,� L' - 24 sear saltbush, salt rass, meadow bane r " 25 hardstem bulrush, creeping bentgrass 26 cattail lCLla:LlG15 L •f .44 LP and r CLI� alder iL �p r V --. �• •�fl S��L �.�Y.-11 l Imagery taken May 2018 provided by Google Earth • N o Wi1war 0.01 0.02 Miles �❑ Unique vegetation patches o Major vegetation transition line Figure 2. Marsh interior vegetation environmentaILLC 0 50 100eet Q Packet Pg. 1 1771 4.8 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 05/7/2019 Council Housing Commission Resolution Staff Lead: Shane Hope Department: Development Services Preparer: Diane Cunningham Background/History Resolution No. 1427 was adopted by the City Council on April 16, 2019, to establish the Citizens' Housing Commission, the Commission's mission, application process, opportunities for public outreach, and a process for making appointments. The Resolution specified that Commissioners must come from diverse areas of the city (reflecting a seven -zone map of the City based on Census information). Each Council member could appoint two members and an alternate from his/her assigned area (or "zone). The Mayor could appoint one member and one alternate. A range of other provisions applied too. Staff Recommendation Adopt the proposed resolution (Attachment 1). This would preclude anyone who now serves or has served on a codified City board or commission during the last two years from serving on the Housing Commission. Narrative At its April 23d meeting, the Council added a new agenda item to discuss having a new or amended resolution to preclude anyone who had served on a codified City board or commission during the last two years from being appointed to the Housing Commission. The Council's general consensus (see Attachment 2, which is an excerpt from draft Council minutes of April 23) was to have the City Attorney bring back a new resolution for this purpose. The new resolution (Attachment 1) to amend the original Resolution No. 1427 has since been prepared by the City Attorney. The City Council may adopt this new resolution by approving the Consent Agenda or by separate action. Attachments: 2019-05-02 resolution to amend housing commission Council Draft Minutes 4-23-19 Citizen's Housing Commission discussion Packet Pg. 162 4.8.a RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING RESOLUTION 1427, WHICH ESTABLISHED THE CITIZENS' HOUSING COMMISSION. WHEREAS, on April 16, 2019, the Edmonds City Council adopted Resolution 1427, which established the Citizens' Housing Commission; and WHEREAS, the Council desires to ensure that the Citizens' Housing Commission supplements the work being performed by its other boards and commissions by bringing forward fresh perspectives on the subject of housing in Edmonds; and WHEREAS, to make it more likely that the Citizens' Housing Commission does not duplicate the work done or perspectives shared previously by the City's other boards and commissions, the Council would like to amend the eligibility requirements for the Citizens' Housing Commission; now therefore, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Subsection 3.A of Resolution 1427, entitled "Qualifications," is hereby amended to read as follows (new text shown in underline): A. Qualifications. Commission applicants must be current residents of Edmonds. PROVIDED THAT, an applicant shall not be eligible for appointment to the Citizens' Housing Commission if that applicant currently holds a position on a City board or commission codified in Title 10 ECC, or if that applicant has held such a position at any time in the two years prior to the date of their application to the Citizens' Housing Commission. RESOLVED this day of May, 2019. CITY OF EDMONDS MAYOR, DAVE EARLING ATTEST: Packet Pg. 163 4.8.a CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: RESOLUTION NO. Packet Pg. 164 4.8.b training regarding how quasi-judicial reviews are conducted. He summarized he was in favor of the Cpuncil in a quasi-judicial role and supported the amendment proposed by Councilmember J Councilmember Teitzel found the decision matrix very helpful. There has been a grea a] of discussion about the cost to a citizen under the current quasi-judicial process to bring an iss o Council versus the new process. It was his understanding the cost to bring an appeal to the it uncil was $500. Under the new process where a citizen brings an issue to Council and states thei ief that an error has been made and Council agrees to advocate for the citizen, there is no cost to citizen. Mr. Lien agreed. Councilmember Nelson expressed s.�upport for the Co 's role in quasi judicial reviews. It is a way for citizens to have an accessible form orgpasi judiu' It may be imperfect but it works and allows citizens to come to City Council. In practice, the'Cl p i1 rarely exercises the role. It is a small price to pay for that accessibility. Mr. Lien summarized a inapnty of the City Council wants to stay in the quasi-judicial role. Staff will prepare an ordinance, Jaling into consideration Coulsciltnember Tibbott's comments. He asked for confirmation that the ouncil supported Councilmember �J hnson's proposed amendment, remaining in a quasi-judicial I�ut moving the highlighted permit types o the Type IIIA column. A majority of the Council sup orted Councilmember Johnson's proposed arriendrilie��t. Mr. Lien advised that change would be includ6d in the ordinance. \ Earling declared a brief recess. Discussion about addingan agenda item regarding the Citizen's I -lousing Commission Council President Fraley-Monillas referred to comments during Audience Comments regarding the Housing Commission. COUNCIL PRESIDENT FRALEY-MONILLAS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO ADD TO THE HOUSING COMMISSION RESOLUTION THAT APPLICANTS MUST NOT CURRENTLY BE SERVING ON BOARDS OR COMMISSIONS OR HAVE SERVED ON BOARDS OR COMMISSIONS OVER THE PAST TWO YEARS. City Attorney Jeff Taraday said as this was a regular meeting, items could be added to the agenda via a vote of the Council. If the intent is to amend a resolution that has already been adopted, that requires another resolution. Council President Fraley-Monillas asked why the resolution could not simply be amended. Mr. Taraday advised the resolution could be amended via another resolution. If the Council's intent is to vote on a resolution not currently before the Council and have it signed by the Mayor without coming back to the Council, that intent should be clear in the motion as that is not the normal process. Councilmember Johnson raised a point of order and suggested putting this on a future agenda due to procedural issues. Council President Fraley-Monillas suggested the Council adopt a new resolution, adding that no citizen currently serving on a board or commission or serving on a board or commission for the last two years for review at the next Council meeting. Mayor Earling spoke in favor of the point of order made by Councilmember Johnson. Mr. Taraday explained as the Council President, Council President Fraley-Monillas could schedule a new resolution on the next agenda without a vote of the Council. Council President Fraley-Monillas said the amendment does not change the intent of the resolution establishing the housing commission. Mr. Taraday Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes April 23, 2019 Page 12 Packet Pg. 165 4.8.b relayed his understand that Council President Fraley-Monillas was directing him to bring back a resolution for the next Council meeting making that amendment. Council President Fraley-Monillas said she did not want to delay the process. She asked if the application process could proceed assuming that additional language. Development Services Director Hope advised staff is ready to seek applications. The current language states preference will be given to those who are not on a City -appointed board or commission; it does not say anything about other organizations that may already be taking positions on housing issues. She suggested slightly modifying that by indicating the Council intends to reexamine that issue and may exclude citizens serving on a board or commission or who have served on a board or commission in the last two years. Council President Fraley-Monillas asked if it was reasonable to inform applicants that a pending amendment could affect certain people's qualifications. Mr. Taraday said it would be okay to inform applicants of that. He suggested ascertaining if there was majority support for that concept by Council. Ms. Hope advised information on the website would be updated as new information arises. Councilmember Johnson reiterated her point of order point of order, expressing concern with just having a head -nod to make a decision this important. She requested it be added to the agenda or to direct the City Attorney to bring it back in two weeks. Councilmember Buckshnis agreed with Councilmember Johnson's point of order. She supported proceeding with the application process with the preference language and Councilmembers could review applications with that in mind. Council President Fraley-Monillas asked if a vote of the Council was required. Mr. Taraday answered as the maker of motion, if it was Council President Fraley-Monillas' desire that staff notify applicants that they may ultimately be disqualified by a future Council action, a vote tonight on that future Council action would be helpful. Otherwise there is no point in providing that notice to applicants. If the Council is content to accept applications and not say anything to the applicants and take action at the next meeting, no vote is necessary as the Council President can put the item on the next Council agenda. His understanding is the Council President has the authority to set the agenda prior to a meeting. Once the Council meeting starts, the agenda is controlled by the Council, not the Council President and adding an agenda item requires a vote of the Council. COUNCILMEMBER NELSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT FRALEY- MONILLAS, TO ADD THIS TO THE AGENDA AS ITEM 8.4. Councilmember Teitzel said as drafted, the resolution did not ignore or disrespect citizen input, it was intended to create flexibility. For example, there was a representative from ACE on Ms. Hope's task force; if the amendment to the resolution is not worded carefully, that person, who has some very good, very definite, valuable thoughts about the housing process could potentially be precluded from serving on the new housing commission. He summarized the wording of resolution provided flexibility and the ability for Councilmembers to use their judgment in allowing citizens to participate. Councilmember Buckshnis agreed with Councilmember Teitzel that there is a difference between a board and a commission and a mayor -selected committee. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 4. RESOLUTION FORMING CITIZENS' HOUSING COMMISSION Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes April 23, 2019 Page 13 Packet Pg. 166 4.8.b COUNCIL PRESIDENT FRALEY-MONILLAS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER NELSON, TO CREATE A NEW RESOLUTION AS THE OLD RESOLUTION STATES WITH THE EXCEPTION OF ADDING ANYBODY CURRENTLY ON A CODIFIED BOARD OR COMMISSION OR HAS BEEN ON A CODIFIED BOARD OR COMMISSION IN THE LAST TWO YEARS SHALL NOT BE PERMITTED TO SERVE. MOTION CARRIED (6-1), COUNCILMEMBER JOHNSON VOTING NO. Councilmember Johnson commented there are many members of boards and commissions with experience with housing such as the Planning Board who has dealt with this issue in many ways. For that reason, she opposed the amendment. Mr. Taraday summarized the revised resolution will be on the May 7, 2019 Consent Agenda. 9. STUDY ITEMS 1. FUND BALANCE / RESERVE POLICY DISCUSSION This iterii.,was removed from the agenda via action taken under Agenda Item 3. 2. PRELIMINARY DECEMBER 2d1S QUARTERLY CINANGx�AI Finance Director Scott James • 2018 financial highlights o Overall City-wide Financial Performance Results Include: • Revenues finished $2.9 million ahead of last year ■ Expenses finished $706,000 lower than last ar ■ Debt was rest ced by $2.507 million ■ Capital expens s totaled $13.1 million • Investment income totaled $917,754,�n increase $264,000 o General Fund Financ4l� erfbr nance Re Its Include: ■ Revenues finished $2'million ahead of last year ■ Sales tax revenues incrc s by $ million ■ Development related revel ues decreased $426,000 ■ Expenditures finished the ye)' at 91 % of Budget ■ Ending Fund Balance increase $707,886 o Comparison of General Fund,, rarigesiin Fund Balance ■ General Fund ending f��.fid balance: $10... o Sales Tax by Source (12 rrionths ended Ncember 31, 2018) II 2018 Total / $8,406,20 Retail Automotiy6 $1,770,393 ManufacturinAz$102,598 Gasoline $35,957 Eating & Diinking $1,021,386 Health & Oersonal Care $235,903 Others $155,487 Constr ction Trade $1,80,883 Clotling & Accessories $244,814 A sement & Recreation $87,647 sc Retail $1,168,815 holesale Trade $309,738 'Communications $241,468 Accommodations $47,962 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes April 23, 2019 Page 14 Packet Pg. 167 4.8.b r Q Packet Pg. 168 5.1 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 05/7/2019 Planning Board Quarterly Report Staff Lead: Matt Cheung, Planning Board Chair Department: Planning Division Preparer: Diane Cunningham Background/History The Planning Board will be presenting their quarterly report. Staff Recommendation N/A Narrative Planning Board 2019 chair Matt Cheung will present to the Council the quarterly report. This meeting was originally scheduled for Jan. and moved to this date. Attached as Exhibit 1 is the Planning Board presentation. Attachments: Exhibit 1: Planning Board Presentation to Council Packet Pg. 169 5.1.a s rm'mToT "mrs 0 1. 0 8 Packet Pg. 170 5.1.a Planning Board Members Phil Lovell (retired) Todd Cloutier Carreen Nordling Rubenlconig Dan Robles Matt Cheung Nathan Monroe Alicia Crank Mike Rosen Connor Bryan (student rep) March Zoo8 January zoio May 2014 May 2014 October aoi4 june2015 February 2oi6 june2017 April zoi9 Packet Pg. 171 L O IZ W L L Map of M L R O I m �s�wau Poi Lyi ® Meadowdale C Beach Park 6 R d .0 C 16@:, si Sid 7 U O ® U O C Southwest $ O County Park C o� O to � PERRINVILLE �xsns d } � L IL � E L spa Lynnwood //0./� ix5a: Sl v W Edmonds ponds_ KimJston Ferry °` z Community College C Edmonds uy.,� � soarnmsw � fC Q Edm�p^ynds Noodle Hut d Marina Beach Park Ciiyf ark = r x}xu a sw f -2 22W, SSW 72DI, G%SW K va Waodway Q 99 Ranch Market LV Esperance d a d Nle + E i 8 Mountlake '3- iOq Terrace Q a Packet Pg. 172 5.1.a Occupations Civil Engineer Software Designer and Program Manager Engineer /Business Owner Planner /Business Owner Construction Manager Corporate Relations Officer Lawyer Marketing Executive Student Packet Pg. 173 5.1.a Demographics Age Ranges 0 <30 30 - 39 40-49 0 50 - 59 6o+ 0 Undecided t Seven male 0 Two female Packet Pg. 174 5.1.a Phil Lovell (retired) Has lived in Edmonds for 25+years Loves that Edmonds is near the water Fun Fact: He lived in Germany for 5 years as a child Packet Pg. 175 5.1.a Todd Cloutier Has lived in Edmonds for iq. years Loves the sense of community in Edmonds Fun Fact: He is a former submarine officer Packet Pg. 176 5.1.a Carreen Nordling Rubenkonig Has lived in Edmonds for 35 years Loves the Edmonds sunsets and watching ferries glide across the Sound Fun Fact: She has lived in Z5 residences in 5 cities in 5 states Packet Pg. 177 5.1.a Dan Robles Has lived in Edmonds for iq. years He loves that Edmonds is quirky Fun Fact: He was a prog rock drummer in Hollywood Packet Pg. 178 5.1.a Matt Cheung Has lived in Edmonds for 6 years Loves that Edmonds is an amazing place to raise a family Fun Fact: He still uses a Blackberry Packet Pg. 179 5.1.a Nathan Monroe Has lived in Edmonds for zz years Loves how connected Edmonds is Fun Fact: He coaches both his nieces' softball teams Packet Pg. 180 5.1.a Alicia Crank Has lived in Edmonds for 5 years Loves that Edmonds is a ferry town Fun Fact: She has been a ghostwriter Packet Pg. 181 5.1.a Mike Rosen Has lived in Edmonds for q. years Loves Edmonds for the people, the charm, the location, and the potential Fun Fact: His grandmother was Betty Crocker Packet Pg. 182 5.1.a Connor Bryan (student rep) Has lived in Edmonds for: s 1Z ears Loves Edmonds for its downtown area because of its small town F_ character and close =` proximity to the beaches p Y . Fun Fact: One of his - s hobbies is making maps of fictitious placesr Packet Pg. 183 5.1.a Topics This Year Small Cell Wireless Haines Wharf Amendment Packet Pg. 184 5.1.a Upcoming Topics Non -Conforming Buildings Joint City Council /Planning Board Meeting -June 18 Housing Communication between City Council and Planning Board Planning Board Alternate Packet Pg. 185 5.1.a Questions? a Packet Pg. 186 7.1 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 05/7/2019 Non -Represented Compensation Study Staff Lead: {Type Name of Staff Lead} Department: City Council Preparer: Maureen Judge Background/History The non -represented compensation study was discussed at the 4/16 and 4/23/19 Council meetings. Staff Recommendation N/A Narrative Continue Council discussions regarding the non -represented compensation study; expected action to occur. Packet Pg. 187 7.2 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 05/7/2019 Gateway sign recommendation Staff Lead: Carrie Hite Department: Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services Preparer: Carrie Hite Background/History Council heard as preliminary proposal for a replacement sign in July of 2018. After some public comment, the Council requested more public process be engaged before finalizing a sign design. Staff Recommendation Approve recommendation from Gateway Sign Committee to complete development of the post & panel sign concept specifications by Forma for fabrication and installation at SR 104 & 5th Ave S. Preliminarily approve additional funds in order to complete the fabrication and installation. Narrative The Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services Department is responsible for wayfinding signage in the City, including park ID signs and gateway entry signage. The wood "Welcome to Edmonds" sign located in the SR 104 WSDOT right of way where it joins 51h Avenue South has been deteriorating for many years. It was determined several years ago that this entry sign for downtown Edmonds needed to be replaced in the near future and replacement was called out in the 2016 CIP with a budget of $40,000. The Parks Department contracted with environmental graphics firm Forma to work with an advisory committee consisting of staff and citizen members of the Arts Commission, Economic Development Commission and Planning Board in October 2017. The committee met three times and recommended a design direction which would meet WSDOT requirements regarding location, foundation, and landscaping. A proposal to City Council was presented in July 2018. The process was sent back to the drawing board after public comment indicated a desire to have the replacement design have more of the look and feel of the existing sign. The committee was expanded to a total of 9 community members, and a process was developed to include two community open houses and two online surveys. The Gateway Sign Committee and designer were tasked with taking into consideration functional requirements associated with the site on highway right of way, keeping in mind the purpose of the sign as an entry to downtown Edmonds from both roadways, and at the same time working with a creative aesthetic that provides some sense of continuity and tells a story for Edmonds. The WSDOT guidelines were shared with the committee regarding size of the marker and message area, issues of potential for traffic distraction, safety and security, visibility, and scale and context compatibility with the landscape and land use. The Committee helped create criteria, reviewing functional and aesthetic elements, and reviewed public Packet Pg. 188 7.2 comment gathered at the first Open House on November 29, 2018 and through an online survey about design elements and sign types that reflect Edmonds. The first Open House included a review of sign types, advantages and disadvantages of each, and elicited comments including thoughts about themes, art elements, fonts, colors, and landscaping. Over 500 responses from the public indicated a preference for post and panel type signage with monument signage being the second choice. There was lively discussion at the first meeting about how the welcome to downtown Edmonds sign should be a reflection of Edmonds' culture and community values while welcoming visitors to the downtown/waterfront business district. The Committee role was to give advice and direction to guide the development of three new concepts presented at the second Open House on February 27, 2019. The three new concepts reflected public comment and the guidance of the committee. A fourth concept by local sign artist Mack Benek was presented as well by a citizen request. In addition, an image of the original sign was included in the survey. The City of Edmonds Gateway Sign survey received a total of 1305 responses through the online version and including the February 27 Open House responses. The results for the question to rank all five of the sign concept options were as follows: 44.14% of respondents ranked the post and panel sign by Clayton Moss as first choice, and 29.20% ranked Mack Benek's post and panel design as their first choice. The more traditional monument sign came in third with 15.48%, the existing sign garnered 6.21%, and the freeform monument sign concept received 4.98%. After five committee meetings, two public open houses, and two online surveys with over 1800 responses, the Edmonds Gateway Sign Committee met and reviewed the information. The Committee unanimously recommended that the post and panel sign concept by Clayton Moss of Forma, which received the strongest public support, be developed for fabrication and installation at SR 104 and 5t" Ave S. The 2019 budget currently includes $10,000 for the gateway sign. Next steps include WSDOT review and approval (up to $2,000), final design specifications for the selected concept, lighting options, and fabrication. Estimated costs for final specifications from designer, WSDOT review, fabrication and lighting are approximately $20,000. Installation and landscaping will be completed by owner. We request preliminary approval of an additional $10,000 to complete the sign project. This can be brought forward as a budget amendment in the next cycle. Schedule for completion depends on promptness of WSDOT review and fabrication timelines but it is anticipated that the sign will be installed by Fall 2019. The Gateway Sign committee will be in attendance and two members will be assisting in the presentation. Packet Pg. 189 7.3 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 05/7/2019 Final Subdivision Approval for Jenkins Lane Plat at 720 13th Way Staff Lead: Mike Clugston Department: Planning Division Preparer: Michael Clugston Background/History Jenkins Lane is a five lot subdivision located at 720 13th Way (File PLN20170028). The applicant applied for preliminary subdivision approval on June 23, 2017. A public hearing on the preliminary plat was held by the Hearing Examiner on October 12, 2017 and approval was granted on November 9, 2017 (Exhibit 3). Documents were submitted for final plat approval on January 15, 2019 and the applicant has now completed all of the requirements of the preliminary plat approval or has provided a bond for their completion (Exhibit 4). The final Jenkins Lane plat signed by the Public Works and Development Services Directors is included as Exhibit 1. Staff Recommendation Approve the resolution in Exhibit 2 in preparation for recording the plat with the Snohomish County Auditor. Narrative Final plats are Type IV -A decisions made by the City Council according to Chapters 20.01 and 20.75 ECDC. If the Council finds that the public use and interest will be served by the proposed subdivision and that all requirements of the preliminary approval have been met or bonded for, the final plat shall be approved and the mayor and city clerk shall sign the statement of city council approval on the final plat. Since all the conditions and requirements of the preliminary plat have been completed or bonded for, the final plat should be approved. Attachments: Exhibit 1 - Jenkins Lane final plat Exhibit 2 - Resolution of approval Jenkins Lane plat Exhibit 3 - Hearing Examiner Preliminary Plat Approval Exhibit 4 - Engineering approval final plat Packet Pg. 190 I 7.3.a I DECLARATION OF PLAT KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: THAT ECHELBARGER HOMES AND LAND, LLC, A WASHINGTON LIMIMTED LIABILITY COMPANY AND THE BANK OF WASHINGTON, THE UNDERSIGNED OWNERS OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED PROPERTY DOES HEREBY DECLARE AND DEDICATE THIS PLAT, AS APPROVED BY THE CITY OF EDMONDS, ON THE — DAY OF 20—, UNDER THE CITY OF EDMONDS FILE NO. PLN20170028, AS THEIR FREE AND VOLUNTARY ACT AND DEED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR DESIRES. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, WE HEREBY SET OUR HANDS AND SEALS THIS S DAY OF 4e-f + _ 20j--j_ THE UNDERSIGNED OWNER OR OWNERS OF THE INTEREST IN THE REAL ESTATE DESCRIBED HEREIN HEREBY DECLARE THIS MAP AND DEDICATE THE SAME FOR THIS PIAT OF JENKINS LANE, AS THAT TERM IS DEFINED IN THE WASHINGTON UNIFORM COMMON INTEREST OWNERSHIP ACT. SOLELY TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE WASHINGTON UNIFORM COMMON INTEREST OWNERSHIP ACT AND NOT FOR ANY PUBLIC PURPOSE. THIS MAP AND ANY PORTION THEREOF IS RESTRICTED BY LAW AND THE DECLARATION FOR JENKINS LANE, RECORDING UNDER SNOHOMISH COUNTY RECORDING NUMBER TODD ECHELBARCER OWNER, ECHEL9ARGER HOrWES AND LAND, LLC, A WASHINGTON LIMIMTED LIABILITY COMPANY. JEANNE M. HANSE SR V10EjPRESIDENT/CHIEF CREDIT OFFICER FOR THE BANK OF WASHINGTON DEDICATION KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS THAT ECHELEIARGER HOMES AND LAND, A WASHINGTON LIMIMTED LABILITY COMPANY AND JEANNE N. HANSEN SR. VICE--PRESIDENT/CHIEF CREDIT OFFICER FOR THE SANK OF WASHINGTON, THE UNDERSIGNED OWNER(S), IN FEE SIMPLE OF THE LAND HEREBY PLATTED, FILE NUMBER PLN20170028, DOES HEREBY DECLARE THIS PLAT AND DEDICATE TO THE USE OF THE PUBLIC FOREVER ALL STREETS, EASEMENTS OR WHATEVER PUBLIC PROPERTY THERE IS SHOWN ON THE PLAT, AND THE USE FOR ANY AND ALL PUBLIC PURPOSES. ALSO, THE RIGHT TO MAKE ALL NECESSARY SLOPES FOR CUTS AND FILLS UPON LOTS, OR TRACT, SHOWN ON THIS PLAT IN THE REASONABLE ORIGINAL GRADING OF ALL THE STREET IMPROVEMENTS. ALSO THE RIGHT OF ACCESS OVER THE LOTS OR TRACT TO THE UTILITY EASEMENT AT ANY TIME FOR THE STATED PURPOSE. IN WETNESS WHEREOF, WE SET OUR HANDS AND SEALS THIS —DAY OF _Ae +-- 2019. TODD ECHELBARGER DATED: HOMES AND LAND, LLC A WASHINGTON LIMIMTED LIABILITY COMPANY JEANNE M. HA EIS SR VICE-PREMEAVCHIEF CREDIT OFFICER FOR THE BANK OF WASHINGTON ACKNOWLEDGMENTS STATE OF WASHINGTON SS COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH I CERTIFY THAT I KNOW OR HAVE SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE THAT TOM ECHFe. F.R IS THE PERSON WHO APPEARED BEFORE ME, AND SAID PERSON ACKNOWLEDGED THAT THEY SIGNED THIS INSTRUMENT ON OATH STATING THAT HE WAS AUTHORIZED TO EXECUTE THE INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED IT AS THE OWNER OF ECHEL6IARGER HOMES AND LAND, LLC, TO BE THE FREE AND VOLUNTARY ACT AND DEED OF SUCH PARTY FOR THE USE AND PURPOSES MENTIONED IN THIS INSTRUMENT FZ_'C7`� DA TEO: No A sIGNATJRE- (PRINT NAME) LYNN K RDWE NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND F_ OR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON Notary Public RESIDING AT L «k t ;$ fcJe_n t) State of Washington MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES. + 1 My Appointment Expires May 12, 2021 STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH J'S I CER77FY THAT I KNOW OR HAVE SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE THAT JEANNE M. HANSEN IS THE PERSON WHO APPEARED BEFORE ME, AND SAID PERSON ACKNOWLEDGED THAT THEY SIGNED THIS INSTRUMENT ON OATH STATING THAT SHE WAS AUTHORIZED TO EXECUTE THE INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED IT AS THE SR. VICE-PRESIDENT/CHIEF CR®1T OFFICER FOR THE BANK OF WASHINGTON, TO BE THE FREE AND VOLUNTARY ACT D DEED OF SUCH PARTY FOR THE USE AND PURPOSES MENTIONED IN THIS INSTRUMENT. �rC DATED: `I ' 5 1 NOTARY 1GNATURE (PRINT NAME) LYNN K ROWE Notary Public NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON State t Washington RESIDING AT-, _ au Cr�1 I My Appointment Expires MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES: IVlay i z, 2021 HOLD HARMLESS AGREEMENT OWNERS, AND ALL PERSONS HAVING ANY PRESENT OR SUBSEQUENT OWNERSHIP INTEREST IN THESE LANDS, AND THEIR SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS OF OWNERS OR OTHER PARTIES HAVING ANY SAID INTEREST, HEREBY AGREE THAT THE CITY OF EDMONDS SHALL BE HELD HARMLESS IN ALL RESPECTS FROM ANY AND ALL CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF WHICH MAY BE OCCASIONED NOW OR IN THE FUTURE TO ADJACENT LAND OR IMPROVEMENT'S BY REASON OF THE CONSTRUCTION, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM, AND HEREBY WAIVE AND RELEASE THE CITY OF EDMONDS FROM ANY AND ALL CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES, EXCLUDING DAMAGE CAUSED SOLELY BY AN ACT OF OMISSION OF S41D CITY, AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF, WHICH THE OWNERS, OR THEIR SUCCESSORS OR ASSIGNS, MAY THEMSELVES HAVE NOW OR IN THE FUTURE BY REASON OF CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION OF SAID DRAINAGE SYSTEM. STORMWATER ACCESS EASEMENT A PERMANENT ACCESS EASEMENT IS HEREBY GRANTED TO THE CITY OF EDMONDS FOR ACCESS AND INSPECTION OF ANY AND ALL AREAS WITHIN LOTS 1, 2, J. 4, 5 AND TRACT 999 OF THIS SHORT PLAT THAT MAY NOW, OR IN THE FUTURE, CONTAIN ANY STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FACILITIES AND/OR SYSTEM(S), INCLUDING ALL APPURTENANCES THEREOF AND THERETO. SAID ACCESS EASEMENT SHALL BE FOR INSPECTION PURPOSES TO ENSURE THAT THE STORMWATER FACILITIES AND/OR SYSTEM(S) ARE PROPERLY OPERATED AND MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY OF EDMONDS CODE CITY OF EDMONDS FINAL PLAT PROJECT NO. PLN20170028 EASEMENT PROVISIONS AND MAINTENANCE THE INGRESS/EGRESS AND UTILITY EASEMENT OVER, UNDER AND ACROSS TRACT 999 AS SHOWN HEREON IS RESERVED FOR AND GRANTED TO LOTS 1 THROUGH 5 FOR THE PURPOSE OF MAINTENANCE, REPAIR AND/OR RECONSTRUCTION OF ANY UTILITY SYSTEMS AND ROADWAY AND APPURTENANCES, TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT OF INGRESS AND EGRESS FOR SUCH PURPOSES. ALL MAINTENANCE, REPAIRS, IMPROVEMENTS AND/OR REBUILDING OF SAID EASEMENT SHALL BE THE OBLIGATION AND RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNERS AND/OR CONTRACT PURCHASERS OF SAID LOTS AND THEIR SUCCESSORS, HEIRS OR ASSIGNS. LOT I DOES NOT, HOWEVER, TAKE ACCESS ACROSS TRACT 999 AND THEREFORE SHALL BE EXEMPT FROM PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE OBLIGATIONS. THE DRAINAGE EASEMENTS FOR STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FOR THE ACCESS ROAD, OVER, UNDER AND ACROSS TRACT 999 AS SHOWN HEREON ARE RESERVED FOR AND GRANTED TO LOTS I THROUGH 5 FOR THE PURPOSE OF MAINTENANCE, REPAIR ANDIOR RECONSTRUCTION OF ANY UTILITY SYSTEMS AND APPURTENANCES, TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT OF INGRESS AND EGRESS FOR SUCH PURPOSES. ALL MAINTENANCE, REPAIRS, IMPROVEMENTS AND/OR REBUILDING OF SAID EASEMENT SHALL BE THE OBLIGATION AND RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNERS ANDIOR CONTRACT PURCHASERS OF SAID LOTS AND THEIR SUCCESSORS, HEIRS OR ASSIGNS. DRAINAGE EASEMENT PROVISIONS CONSISTENT WITH APPROVED STORM DRAIN PLANS FILED WITH THE CITY OF EDMONDS UNDER PLN20170028' TRACT 999 CONTAINS A STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FACILITY REFERRED TO AS AN "LID BMP", WHICH WAS INSTALLED TO MITICATE THE STORMWATER QUANTITY AND QUALITY IMPACTS OF SOME OR ALL OF THE IMPERVIOUS OR NON—NATIVE PERVIOUS SURFACES ON THE PROPERTY. LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT" MEANS DEVELOPMENT CONDUCTED IN A WAY THAT SEEKS TO MINIMIZE OR COMPLETELY PREVENT ALTERATIONS TO THE NATURAL HYDROLOGY OF THE SITE LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT INCLUDES SITE PLANNING AND DESIGN TO REDUCE ALTERATIONS OF NATURAL SOIL AND VEGETATIVE COVER, MINIMIZE IMPERVIOUS SURFACES, AND SPECIFIC PRACTICES THAT HELP TO REPLICATE NATURAL HYDROLOGY SUCH AS PERMEABLE PAVEMENTS, GREEN ROOFS, SOIL AMENDMENTS, BIORETENTION SYSTEMS, AND DISPERSION OF RUNOFF. THE OWNERS SHALL MAINTAIN THE SIZE PLACEMENT, AND DESIGN OF THE LID BMP AS DEPICTED ON THE APPROVED CIVIL CONSTRUCTION PLANS AND DESIGN DETAILS SHALL BE MAINTAINED AND MAY NOT BE CHANGED WITHOUT WRITTEN APPROVAL EITHER FROM THE ENGINEERING DIVISION OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS OR THROUGH A FUTURE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT FROM THE CITY OF EDMONDS. CHEMICAL FERTILIZERS AND PESTICIDES SHALL NOT BE USED WHERE LID BMP IS LOCATED. ALL COSTS OF MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR SHALL BE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNERS. THE OWNERS SHALL INSPECT LID BMPS ANNUALLY FOR PHYSICAL DEFECTS. AFTER MAJOR STORM EVENTS, THE SYSTEM SHALL ALSO BE CHECKED TO ENSURE THAT THE OVERFLOW SYSTEM IS WORKING PROPERLY. THE OWNERS ALSO SHALL MAINTAIN ALL LID BMPS SO THEY FUNCTION AS DESIGNED ON A YEAR-ROUND BASIS. THE PRIVATE SEWER EASEMENT OVER, UNDER AND ACROSS LOTS 4 AND 5 AS SHOWN HEREON IS RESERVED FOR AND GRANTED TO LOTS 2 THROUGH 5, AND TAX PARCELS 27032500314200, 27032500314300 AND 27032500JI4400 FOR THE PURPOSE OF MAINTENANCE, REPAIR AND/OR RECONSTRUCTION OF ANY UTILITY SYSTEMS AND APPURTENANCES, TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT OF INGRESS AND EGRESS FOR SUCH PURPOSES. ALL MAINTENANCE, REPAIRS, IMPROVEMENTS AN01OR REBUILDING OF SAID EASEMENT SHALL BE BORNE JOINTLY AND EQUALLY BY THE OWNERS OF LOTS 2 THROUGH 5, AND TAX PARCELS 27032500314200, 27032500314300 AND 27032500314400, EXCEPT NO OWNER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE REPAIR, AND/OR RECONSTRUCTION OF THAT PORTION OF THE COMMONLY USED SYSTEMS LOCATED UPSTREAM FROM THE POINT OF CONNECTION OF THAT RESPECTIVE LOT OWNER. THE EASEMENT ALSO BENEFITS THE LOTS DIRECTLY TO THE WEST OF SUBJECT PROPERTY. CONSTRUCTION OF INDIVIDUAL STORM WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS HAS BEEN DEFERRED TO COINCIDE WITH THE FUTURE DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL FOR LOTS 1 THROUGH 5. THE STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM SHALL BE DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY OF EDMONDS STORM WATER MANAGEMENT CODES AND REGULATIONS EFFECTIVE AT THE TIME OF DEVELOPMENT THE STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM SHALL BE REVIEWED FOR COMPLIANCE AT THE TIME OF BUILDING PERMIT SUBMITTAL AND CONSTRUCTED IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE APPROVED BUILDING PERMIT. TRACT 999, AS SHOWN HEREON IS RESERVED FOR AND GRANTED TO THE JENKINS LANE HOME OWNERS ASSOCIATION UPON RECORDING OF THIS PLAT FOR THE PURPOSE OF MAINTENANCE; REPAIR AND/OR RECONSTRUCTION OF ANY UTILITY SYSTEMS, ROADWAY AND APPURTENANCES, TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT OF INGRESS AND EGRESS FOR SUCH PURPOSES. ALL MAINTENANCE, REPAIRS, IMPROVEMENTS AND/OR REBUILDING OF SAID TRACT SHALL BE THE OBLIGATION AND RESPONSIBILITY OF THE SAYLOR LANE HOME OWNERS ASSOCIATION AND THEIR SUCCESSORS, HEIRS OR ASSIGNS. RESTRICTIONS 1. COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, RESTRICTIONS, RECITALS, RESERVATIONS, EASEMENTS, EASEMENT PROVISIONS, DEDICATIONS, BUILDING SETBACK LINES, NOTES, STATEMENTS, AND OTHER MATTERS, IF ANY, BUT OMITTING ANY COVENANTS OR RESTRICTIONS, IF ANY. INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THOSE BASED UPON RACE COLOR, RELIGION, SEX SEXUAL ORIENTATION, FAMILIAL STATUS, MARITAL STATUS, DISABILITY, HANDICAP, NATIONAL ORIGIN, ANCESTRY, OR SOURCE OF INCOME, AS SET FORTH IN APPLICABLE STATE OR FEDERAL LAWS, EXCEPT TO THE EXTENT THAT SAID COVENANT OR RESTRICTION IS PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW, AS SET FORTH ON CITY OF EDMONDS PLAT NO. S-50-79: RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 8108120198. 2. SUBJECT TO AN EASEMENT TO THE CITY OF EDMONDS, PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 1 OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY AND GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY OF THE NORTHWEST INC., FOR INGRESS, EGRESS AND UTILITIES AS RECORDED THEREIN UNDER RECORDING NO. 8105040217, S41D EASEMENT SUPERSEDES THAT INSTRUMENT AS RECORDED THEREIN UNDER RECORDING NO. 8012150166. SAID EASEMENT CONTAINS A PROVISION FOR BEARING A PROPORTIONATE OR EQUAL COST OF MAINTENANCE, REPAIR OR RECONSTRUCTION OF SAID ACCESS AND UTILITIES BY THE COMMON USERS. J. RELEASE OF DAMAGES TO ROBERT LEE WETTER AND MURIEL WETTER FOR THE LOCATION, ESTABLISHMENT, CONSTRUCTION, DRAINAGE AND MAINTENANCE OF SAID STREET, AS RECORDED THEREIN UNDER RECORDING NO. 2170084. 4, ANY RIGHTS, INTERESTS, OR CLAIMS WHICH MAY EXIST OR ARISE BY REASON OF THE FOLLOWING MATTERS DISCLOSED i3Y SURVEY, AS RECORDED THEREIN UNDER RECORDING NO. 8103195019. 5. ANY RIGHTS, INTERESTS, OR CLAIMS WHICH MAY EXIST OR ARISE BY REASON OF THE FOLLOWING MATTERS DISCLOSED BY SURVEY, AS RECORDED THEREIN UNDER RECORDING NO. 8105285006. 6. SUBJECT TO AN EASEMENT TO PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT NO. I OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY AND FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS NORTHWEST, FOR ELECTRIC AND UTILITY DISTRIBUTION AS RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 201808150499. 7. SUBJECT TO DEED OF TRUST TO THE BANK OF WASHINGTON, AS RECORDED OCTOBER 3, 2017 UNDER RECORDING NO. 201710030529. ASSIGNMENTS OF RENTS AND LEASES AS RECORDED OCTOBER 3, 2017 UNDER RECORDING NO. 201710030530, 8. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL MUST BE MET AND CAN BE FOUND IN THE FINAL APPROVAL FOR THE SUBDIVISION LOCATED IN FILE NO. PLN20170028 IN THE CITY OF EDMONDS PLANNING DIVISION. io FOOT FRONTAGE UTILITY EASEMENT AN EASEMENT SHALL BE RESERVED FOR AND GRANTED TO ALL UTILITIES SERVING THE SUBJECT PLAT AND THEIR RESPECTIVE SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, UNDER AND UPON THE EXTERIOR (10) FEET PARALLEL WITH AND ADJOINING THE STREET FRONTAGE OF ALL LOTS IN WHICH TO INSTALL, LAY, CONSTRUCT, RENEW, OPERATE AND MAINTAIN UNDERGROUND CONDUITS, CABLES, PIPE AND WIRES WITH NECESSARY FACILITIES AND OTHER EQUIPMENT FOR THE PURPOSE OF SERVING THIS SUBDIVISION AND OTHER PROPERTY WITH ELECTRIC, TELEPHONE, AND UTILITY SERVICE, TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT TO ENTER UPON THE LOTS AT ALL TIMES FOR THE PURPOSE HEREIN STATED. ENCROACHMENT NOTES: EVIDENCE OF LAND OCCUPATION SUCH AS FENCES, STRUCTURES, PAVED OR GRAVELED SURFACES, LANDSCAPING, ETC. MAY NOT COINCIDE WITH THE DEEDED BOUNDARY LINES, AS SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING. THERE ARE AREAS ON THIS SURVEY APPEARWG TO HAVE DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN THE DEEDED BOUNDARY LINES AND CERTAIN EVIDENCE OF OCCUPATION. THE OWNER OR POTENTIAL PURCHASER SHOULD CONSULT WITH LEGAL COUNSEL WHEREVER DISCREPANCIES EXIST TO DETERMINE HOW BEST TO INTERPRET THEIR PROPERTY RIGHTS AND ADDRESS POTENTIAL BOUNDARY DISPUTES, APPROVALS DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS THE SURVEY DATE, LAYOUT OF STREETS, ALLEYS AND OTHER RIGHTS OF WAY, DESIGN OF BRIDGES, SEWAGE AND WATER SYSTEM AND OTHER STRUCTURES ARE APPROVED AND THE SUBJECT FINAL PLAT 1SFOR �ECrSjRDI)W BY THE CITY OF EDMONDS PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR BY.. THIS :> 0— DAY OF 2079 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR THE SUBJECT FINAL PLAT CONFORMS TO THE APPROVED PRELIMINARY PLAT AND ALL CONDITIONS OF THE PRELIMINARY APPROVAL AND 1S APPROVED AND AUTHORIZED FOR RECORDING BY THE CITY OF EDMONDS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR BY L6 THISDAY OF , 2019 •" 1 MAYOR THE CITY COUNCIL HAS ACCEPTED THE STREET DEDICATION ASSOCIATED WITH THE SUBJECT PLAT. EXAMINED AND APPROVED THIS DAY OF 2019_ MAYOR, CITY OF EDMONDS ATTEST, CITY CLERK COUNTY TREASURER'S CERTIFICATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ALL STATE AND COUNTY TAXES HERETOFORE LEVIED AGAINST THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN, ACCORDING TO THE BOOKS AND RECORDS OF MY OFFICE, HAVE BEEN FULLY PAID AND DISCHARGED, INCUDING TAXES. TREASURER, SNOHOMISH COUNTY BY: DEPUTY COUNTY TREASURER TAX PARCEL NUMBER: 270325--003-141-00 AUDITOR'S CERTIFICATE FILED FOR RECORD THIS AT M., IN BOOK DAY OF _ _ , 20L—, OF SURVEYS, AT PAGE AT THE REQUEST OF PACIFIC COAST SURVEYS, INC. COUNTY AUDITOR DEPUTY COUNTY AUDITOR LAND SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE THIS MAP CORRECTLY REPRESENTS A SURVEY MADE BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SURVEY RECORDING ACT AT THE REQUEST OF TODD ECHELBARGER IN JANUARY, 2019. 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT OF JENKINS LANE IS BASED UPON AN ACTUAL SURVEY OF THE PROPERTY HEREIN DESCRIBED; THAT THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES ARE CORRECTLY SHOWN; THAT ALL INFORMATION REQUIRED BY THE WASHINGTON UNIFORM COMMON INTEREST OWNERSHIP ACT IS SUPPLIED HEREIN; AND THAT ALL HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL BOUNDARIES OF THE UNITS, (1) TO THE EXTENT DETERMINED BY THE WALLS, FLOORS OR CEILINGS THEREOF, OR OTHER PHYSICAL MONUMENTS, ARE SUBSTANTALLY COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID MAP, OR (2) TO THE EXTENT SUCH BOUNDARIES ARE NOT DEFINED BY PHYSICAL MONUMENTS, SUCH BOUNDARIES ARE SHOWN ON THE MAP. - - Ok DARREN J. RIDDLE PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR CERTIFICATE NO. 37535 THIS SURVEY DISCLOSES FACTORS OF RECORD AND ON THE GROUND AFFECTING THE SUBJECT PROPERTY BOUNDARY, BUT IT DOES NOT PURPORT TO LEGALLY RESOLVE RELATED PROPERTY LINE DISPUTES. WHERE AMBIGUITIES ARE NOTED, THE OWNER OR POTENTIAL PURCHASER SHOULD CONSULT WITH A LEGAL COUNSEL TO DETERMINE HOW BEST TO INTERPRET THEIR PROPERTY RIGHTS AND ADDRESS ANY POTENTIAL PROPERTY LINE DISPUTES. A. F. NO. Pacific Coast Surveys, Inc. LAND SURVEYING &MAPPING P.O. BOX 1361q MILL CREEK, WA 98o82 PH. 425.512-7099 FAX 425,357.3577 www.PCSurveys.net DATE 1 OF 2- PLAT MAP FOR: JENKINS LANE NE 7 4, SW 1141 SEC 25, T 27N., R.3E., W.M. DRAWN 13Y DATE DRAWING FILE NAME SCALE JOB NO. DPIMAH o¢.27.19 771279fsp.6 NONE 17-1279 Packet Pg. 191 7.3.a C/TY OF EDMONDS FINAL PLAT PROJECT NO. PLN20170028 FOUND 3" BRASS DISK SURFACE W/X. RPRIL LEGAL DESCRIPTION - EXISTING PARCEL 4 OF CITY OF EDMONDS SHORT PLAT NO. S-50-79, RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 8108120198, BEING A PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 25, TOWNSHIP 27 NORTH, RANGE 3 FAST, W.M., IN SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON. SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH, STATE OF WASHINGTON. LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS - NEW LOT 1: LO 1, OF CITY OF EDMONDS SUBDIVISION, PLN20170028. SENATE IN THE COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH, STATE OF WASHINGTON. LOT 2: LOT 2; OF CITY OF EDMONDS SUBDIVISION, PLN20170028. SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH, STATE OF WASHINGTON. LOT 3: LOT 3, OF CITY OF EDMONDS SUBDIVISION, PLN20170028. SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH, STATE OF WASHINGTON. LOT 4: CUT-+F OF CITY OF EDMONDS SUBDIVISION, PW20170028. SITUATE 1N THE COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH, STATE OF WASHINGTON. LOT 5_ TUF-S, OF CITY OF EDMONDS SUBDIVISION, PLN20170028. SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH, STATE OF WASHINGTON. LEGEND SET 1/2" X 24" REBAR W/GAP STAMPED "LS. 37536" * EXISTING REBAR W/CAP, AS NOTED ❑ SET PROPERTY LINE STAKES FOUND EXISTING CASED CONCRETE MONUMENT AS DESCRIBED SET CONCRETE MONUMENT IN CASE WITH BRASS DISC PUNCHED AND STAMPED LS. 37536' RIGHT OF WAY CENTERLINE EQUIPMENT & PROCEDURES NETH090 OF SURVEY• SURVEY PERFORMED BY FIELD TRAVERSE INSWMETYTATKW. LEICA TS15 ROBOTIC ELECTRONIC TOTAL STATION PREC1SM-1 MEETS OR EXCEEDS STATE STANDARDS WAC 332-130-090 THE MONUMENTED CENTERLINE OF 7TH PL S., AS THE BEARING OF N 01'37 34" E, PER TFfE PLAT OF BIRCH ADDITION DIV. NO. 2 RECORDED IN VOLUME 37 OF PLATS, PAGES 71- 72, RECORDS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON. GENERAL NOTES 1.) THIS SURVEY HAS BEEN PREPARED FOR THE EXCLUSIVE USE OF PARTIES WHOSE NAMES APPEAR HEREON ONLY, AND DOES NOT EXTEND TO ANY UNNAMED THIRD PAR71ES WITHOUT EXPRESS RECERTIFICATION BY THE LAND SURVEYOR. 2.) BOUNDARY LINES SHOWN AND CORNERS SET REPRESENT DEED LOCATIONS; OWNERSHIP LINES MAY VARY. NO GUARANTEE OF OWNERSHIP IS EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED. 3.) SETBACKS SHOWN ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY AND VEST NO RIGHT. 0 2017. CURVE TABLE �a LINE TABLE LINE I BEARING DISTANCE L1 1 N 01'3734 E 25.07 L2 N 01'37 34 E 10.00 L3 IN 88'22 26 W 20.06 L4 IN 05'57 32 E 4.36 L5 I N 1702 35 E 10.37 L6 N 01'3734 E t I BIRCH ADD. DIV. 2 i VOL. 37, PC. 71- 72 14 00657000001400 CARVE RADIU NGTH ANGLE Cl 257.79 65.70 14'36 O9 C2 25T7-9 10.57 2'2100 C3 257.79 55.13 12'15 09 C4 20.00 31.42 9O'OO OO C5 20.00 ST42 9O'OO GD 35.01 � '•. FOUND 3" BRASS DISK SURFACE W/X. APRIL s` 2017. I + BIRCH ADD. DIV. 2 VOL. 31, PC. 71--72 1 4 s `- 12 1 10 I 0 L 00657000001200 i 00657000001000 0 00657000001100 00 rn cx PROPOSED 10' RIGHT OF WAY ' v FOUND 3" BRASS DISK SURFACE DEDICATION TO THE CITY OF 15' '��y � MON. NO PUNCH, HELD CENTER EDMONDS 1,984 SO. FT. 13TH WAY S.W. OF MOH. APRfL 2017. _ N 88'22'26' W 319.78' T _j - :- N 88'22'26ik-- W 179.77' (EXISTING) :, - �o. s5 2.98' r 7 N 88'22 26' W ]77.01 ' a I FOUND 3" BRASS DISK SURFACE 1n I r A 44.95' 20.06' ROW AFTER 10DEDICATION T 12.0O' MOH. W/X. APRfL 2017. T + 10' + a 27032500314400 I ' ,•c� T - - - - -' - - - - - - - - "- - - - ----- --. FOUND REBAR W/GAP STAMPED ----------------- ---------- ___ - ~ ,`� 7RI-CO 14490" 10' SOUTH OF N / + I 10, UT ui CORNER ON PROPERTY LINE EASEMENT I'• ---------------------------------- ( o g +sZ v r 720 13TH WAY S.W. I ____________'_ 5 '° $ 6,360 SF (NET/GROSS) r am + 706 13TH WAY S.W. II�LI +� -- -- - _____-858L TYP. -- ----------�r FENCE CORNER IS 0.2'(E) I W I._ I LEEEVRE 6,121 SF (NET/GROSS) I `G "' ' p , � OF PROPERTY LINE y t L► I I ' VOL. 3, f G. 144 I +- 10' SEWER ;a $ a+'= 4i N 88'2226" W 100.00' `4 0064 7000000100 1 i l EASEMENT 16n v �V ",:4 ry Q 25' ACCESS r4 UTILITY I 25' •"� - -- I� n - -- _ - - -- - - --SsBL EASEMENT A.F.18105040217 1¢ ~ ' 2 1 v I + +� +z I I 27032500314300 _ BSBL 7YP; + 2 ;� 10' SS EASEMENT + PER AFN 7702170252 ! ' 716 13TH WAY S.W. Z 1 '\ N 88'22'2S'" W 63.27' �i I 6,077 SF (NET/GROSS) i+- + --------L------...._---- = I \ � 1O' 10' LOT 4 ;-�-•-_____-----------------------------_-__-r - - - � �` -----_--____-__-_-- _ _ 2703250431A100 i 1 35,161 SF ; Y - - - T -------'-------------------- ! FENCE END IS 1 S'(w) I + + / f ; FOUND RE64R W CAP I . r OF PROPERTY LINE 10' SEWER f o ,' EASEMENT n I 3 A ' 4 27032500JI4200 ' "� i 712 13TH WAY S.W. 6,049 SF (NET/GROSS) + iEn ra FENCE CORNER is 0.3'(E) :k. + I OF PROPERTY LINE e r I `------------- ------ I 12 ` 00390100001200 `. FENCE IS 1.7'(N) OF t r+ PROPERTY CORNER L_-, 858E TYP,......... FENCE IS 1.2'(N) OF PROPERTY CORNER I1 00390100001100 SCALE: 1" = 3D' 0 30 60 1 STAMPED *RI -CO 14490' L4 - N 8$`2226" W 8700' -- 0.1'(W) OF PROPERTY LINE ` - FENCE CORNER IS 0.2'(W) f L _ _ - _ _ - - - _ _ --R5L�L_p p _ _ _ _ _ - -- - - OF PROPERTY LINE I I i r � 714 1SIN WAY S.W. Try r 6,150 SF (NET/GROSS) � r r r i r + FENCE IS 1.3'(N) OF L - - -MOD - ` - - - - 85R! TYP-- - - i PROPERTY CORNER -._H'TLOD FENCE - - nc� - N 8822 26' W 173 86' 10 00390100001000 BEL AIR DIV C VOL. 20, PG. 117 2 00547000000200 SUNSET W. DIV. 7 VOL. 35, PG. 77 FOUND NAIL IN FENCE i--------------------------_ 1.0'(N) OF CORNER ON r PROPERTY LINE I 9 i 8 i 7 00390100000900 ' 00390100000800 i 00390100000700 Pacific Coast Surveys, Inc. LAND SURVEYING &MAPPING P.O. BOX 13619 MILL CREEK, WA 98082 PH. 425.572-7099 FAX 425.357.3577 www.PCSurveys.net OF 2 PLAT MAP FOR: JENKINS LANE 111E 1 4, SW 1 4, SEC.25, T.27N., R.3E., W.M. DRAWN BY DATE 1DRAWINC FILE NAME SCALE JOB NO. DP/MAH 04..21.19 171279fSF.dwg I" = 30 17-1279 Packet Pg. 192 7.3.b RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, APPROVING THE JENKINS LANE FINAL PLAT. a d c M J WHEREAS, the Hearing Examiner approved a five lot preliminary plat for the c Jenkins Lane subdivision (PLN20170028) on November 9, 2017, subject to several L conditions; and M WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted documents for final plat approval; and o a WHEREAS, staff has reviewed those documents and determined that all 0 conditions of preliminary approval have been satisfied; and •T �a WHEREAS, all approved civil site improvements have been installed or a bond Cn has been provided for their completion; and c UM WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the final plat documents on May 7, 2019; M a and a! WHEREAS, based on those documents, the City Council finds that the subdivision conforms to all terms of the Hearing Examiner's preliminary plat approval, and that the subdivision meets the requirements of chapter 58.17 RCW, other applicable state laws, and all local ordinances adopted under chapter 58.17 RCW that were in effect at the time of preliminary plat approval; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The city council hereby approves the Jenkins Lane final plat described in the WHEREAS clauses above, having satisfied the terms of approval established by the Hearing Examiner. Section 2. The Mayor is hereby authorized to inscribe and execute this approval on the face of the plat on behalf of the City Council. 1 Packet Pg. 193 7.3.b Section 3. The City Clerk is hereby authorized to record, at the expense of the applicant, said final plat approval, in accordance with the ordinances of the City of Edmonds. RESOLVED THIS DAY OF , 2019: MAYOR DAVE EARLING ATTEST: CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: RESOLUTION NO. Packet Pg. 194 7.3.c I 2 'fIc. 1$9" 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CITY OF EDMONDS 121 51h Avenue North, Edmonds WA 98020 Phone: 425.771.0220 • Fax: 425.771.0221 • Web: www.edmondswa.gov DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT • PLANNING DIVISION BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR THE CITY OF EDMONDS Phil Olbrechts, Hearing Examiner RE: Jenkins Lane FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS Preliminary Plat OF LAW AND FINAL DECISION PLN20170028 INTRODUCTION The Applicant is proposing to subdivide a 33,177sf property located at 720 13th Way SW into five lots. The preliminary plat application is approved subject to conditions. ORAL TESTIMONY Jen Machuga, Edmonds Associate Planner, summarized the proposal. In response to Examiner questions, Jean McConnell, City Engineering Program Manager, noted that no trip generation study was required because the proposal didn't generate enough traffic for the study threshold. In response to Examiner questions, Ms. Machuga clarified that students would have to cross 13th to get to sidewalks located only on the other side. In response to a question from Ms. Po, Ms. Machuga responded that no sidewalks were required of the Applicant for 13th Ken McIntyre, Applicant's Engineer, noted that 13th Way SW would be widened. Access to the plat will be off a single driveway cut off of 13th and then a shared driveway. Stormwater management will be provided on site through infiltration of good soils. Preliminary Plat P. 1 Findings, Conclusions and Decision Packet Pg. 195 1 7.3.c 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Tom Wolfe, neighbour, inquired whether there would be construction in the private road west of Lots 4 and 5. Tom Eichelbarger, applicant, responded there was no intention of going into the western road. He noted he has rights to use the road but there's no proposal to use it. In response to another question from Mr. Wolfe, Mr. Eichelbarger responded that the project wouldn't be connecting to the public drainage system but would rather be infiltrating into the ground. Bill Westgard, neighbour, noted the proposal would increase traffic. He noted that 13th would not be the same along the project frontage as the rest of 13th. He believed that the street would be marked as a fire lane, which would prevent people from parking, which means a loss of parking for area residents. He also noted that the fire apparatus turning radius for the project doesn't meet code. He noted that many neighbors have seen owls and eagles using trees at the project site. In rebuttal, Ms. McConnell stated that there were no fire lane requirements for 13th, that those standards only applied to interior streets. She noted that the improvements made by the Applicant to 13th would not reduce the amount of parking currently available on the street in the sense that no on street parking is designated now for 13th and none will be with the improvements. Mr. Westgard asserted that the reduced pavement width along 13th was inconsistent with City objectives in having a uniform street system. The City Engineer noted that the width along project frontage is less than other portions of 13th but that this width reduction furthers City objectives of limiting impervious surface and also, in response to Examiner questions, that the proposed width meets City street standards and no waivers of those standards is involved. In response to questions from Mr. Wolfe, Mr. Eichelbarger noted that there would not be a need to close any surrounding street for construction activity. Mr. Eichelbarger also noted that trees located within required road improvements will have to be removed. In response to questions from Ms. Po about the trees located on the northeast corner of the property, Mr. Eichelbarger noted that there are seven trees there and three are scheduled to come down. Three trees in the middle of the property will be removed. Three of nine trees near Mr. O'Neal's property on the south property line will also be removed. Ms. Po asked about how one lot would access 13th. Mr. Eichelbarger noted that access would be through the curb cut shown on the plat map. EXHIBITS Ex. 1: Staff report with 24 attachments Ex. 2: October 6, 2017 Letter from Snohomish County PUD No. 1 Ex. 3: Email from Michael O'Neal, received 10/9/17 Ex. 4: Email with Attached Letter from Michael O'Neal, received 10/9/17 Ex. 5: Email from Michael O'Neal, received 10/12/17 Preliminary Plat p. 2 Findings, Conclusions and Decision Packet Pg. 196 1 7.3.c 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Ex. 6: Staff Response to Michael O'Neal, sent 10/12/17 Ex. 7: O'Neal Comments Received 10/13/17 and 10/16/17 Ex. 8: Applicant email response from Tom Echelbarger dated October 17, 2017 Ex. 9: October 17, 2017 Letter to Examiner from Edmonds Staff Ex. 10: Order Extending Staff and Appellant Reply Deadline to October 26, 2017 Ex. 11: October 26, 2017 Email from City Staff to Examiner with 6 attachments Ex. 12: Applicant's Cover letter, dated 10/18/17 Ex. 13: Revised Preliminary Plat, dated 10/17/17 Ex. 14: Revised Preliminary Development Plans, dated 10/18/17 Ex. 15: Revised Engineering Requirements, dated October 23, 2017 FINDINGS OF FACT Procedural: 1. Applicant/Owner. The property owner is Annette Kessler, PR of Leo William LeFevre Estate. The Applicant is Echelbarger Investments, LLC. 2. Hearing. The Hearing Examiner conducted a hearing on the application on October 13, 2017 at 3:00 p.m. at the Edmonds Public Safety Complex in the Council Chambers. The hearing was left open through October 19, 2017 to enable hearing participants an opportunity to comment on Exhibits 2-6. By Order dated October 18, 2017, the response deadline was extended to October 26, 2017 to provide an opportunity to respond to an error in the Applicant's application materials. Substantive: 3. Site/Proposal Description. The Applicant is proposing to subdivide a 33,177sf property located at 720 13th Way SW into five lots. An existing single- family home will be demolished. Vehicular access to Lot 1 is proposed to be directly off of 13th Way SW, while Lots 2 through 5 would gain access via a shared vehicular access tract. The following tables summarizes the dimensions of the proposed lots: Required LotArea Proposed Gross Area (sq. ft, Proposed het Area, (sq. ft.) Lot 2 6,000 6,360 6X0 Lot'_ 6.00D 6,077 6,077 Lot 3 6_C! �U 6J50 6J50 Lot 4 6,CIJ 6,049 6,049 Lot 5 6,00o 6J21 6J21 Tract 999 0 2,420 2,420 lNote= Net lot area excludes the area of any vehicular ingresslegress easements. Preliminary Plat p. 3 Findings, Conclusions and Decision Packet Pg. 197 1 7.3.c 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 4. Characteristics of the Area. The site is located within a single-family residential neighborhood in Edmonds. The subject property and the surrounding area are zoned RS-6 (single-family residential; 6,000 square foot minimum lot size). The subject property is developed with an existing single-family residence and associated structures, including a pool and two sheds. Surrounding properties are much smaller in size than the subject site, but are also developed with single-family residences. 5. Adverse Impacts. There are no significant adverse impacts created by the proposal. Impacts are more specifically addressed as follows: A. Critical Areas. There are no critical areas on the project site. B. Views. Adjoining neighbors expressed concern over the loss of views due to landscape alteration and the change in density (Ex. 4). The surrounding area is developed with single-family residences. The proposal will also develop single-family residences. There is no identified view feature that would be blocked by the development. The Applicant is limited to a 25-foot building height by the RS-6 zoning district, which is a legislative determination of what height is reasonable for this area. Any view impacts created by the proposal that conform to the 25-foot height limit must be considered nonsignificant for purposes of project mitigation. At any rate there are no City regulations that specifically regulate impact on views, other than to require that impacts to views be minimized. In the absence of any specific guidelines, the Applicant should have a reasonable opportunity to develop their property just as the neighbors did with their property. C. Street. Tract 999 will intersect with 13th Way SW. All of the lots except Lot 1 will access Tract 999. Lot 1 will directly access 131h Way SW. Traffic impact fees consistent with Chapter 18.82 ECDC will be collected with building permits for each individual lot to mitigate system -wide traffic impacts. No hazardous impacts are anticipated from the low volume of traffic generated by the new subdivision and it is not expected to impact congestion on streets and highways. D. Grading. The proposal minimizes grading because all but one (Lot 1) of the proposed residences will gain access via the proposed private drive shown as Tract 999 on the preliminary plat map, and the future home sites generally conform to the existing topography. The access for Lot 1 will not result in a significant amount of increased grading. E. Hazardous Conditions. The staff report notes that there are no known hazardous conditions, such as flood plains, steep slopes, or unstable soil or geologic conditions at the project site. Given that there is no evidence to the contrary, the staff finding is taken as a verity. Preliminary Plat p. 4 Findings, Conclusions and Decision Packet Pg. 198 1 7.3.c 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 F. Trees. There are 37 trees on the subject site. 16 of these are evergreen trees within the roadway dedication along the northern property line. These 16 trees will likely be removed in order to widen 131h Way SW (Ex. 1, Att. 21 and Ex. 15). The majority of the trees are evergreen and are located near the northeastern corner and along the southern side of the site, while a few of the trees are fruit trees located near the middle of the site. Outside of the dedication area, some of the trees are in locations that could be retained during future development of the proposed lots. The Applicant presently intends to preserve nine trees near the southern property boundary (Ex. 12). Tree retention will be reviewed with the civil improvement plans for the subdivision. A condition of approval requires the Applicant to submit a tree cutting plan for approval with the civil permits. During the civil construction plan review phase of the process, the Applicant will need to revise the development plans such that the clearing limits are consistent with tree retention requirements. Mr. O'Neal contends removal of trees along the southern property boundary will create a "wind tunnel" during storms that could cause damage to remaining trees and surrounding houses (Ex. 4). There was no expert testimony regarding the health of the on -site trees or the affects that might be caused by removal of some or all of the trees. As noted above, the Applicant will provide a tree cutting plan. As part of the condition of approval, the Applicant must provide an arborist report describing the general hazards represented by each tree and by the cumulative effect of removing the trees. Only trees that will be impacted by the civil improvements or that are hazardous may be removed during the civil construction plan review phase of the process. Any other tree removal that is proposed would be reviewed during the building permit application review process for the future single- family residences. G. Construction Noise. Mr. O'Neal expressed concerns about the duration and level of construction noise (Ex. 4). The Staff response (Ex. 10) correctly noted that construction noise must comply with the City's noise ordinance, ECC 5.30. ECC 5.30.1103 exempts sounds originating from temporary construction sites as a result of construction activity during the hours of 7:00 am to 6:00 pm on weekdays and 10:00 am to 6:00 pm on Saturdays, excluding Sundays and federal holidays. Construction will be required to comply with this schedule to minimize impacts from noise. These standards set a legislative standard of what has been determined to be acceptable construction noise impacts and therefore compliance is not found to create any significant adverse noise impacts. The City has established a procedure for citizen complaints for violation of the above code (ECC 5.30.140) and penalties for confirmed violations (ECC 5.30.150). H. Dust. Dust will be mitigated. Mr. O'Neal expressed concern regarding the amount of dust coming from the property during construction (Ex. 4). The Preliminary Plat p. 5 Findings, Conclusions and Decision Packet Pg. 199 1 7.3.c 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Applicant will be required to prepare a temporary erosion and sediment control plan as part of the civil construction plan review stages and during subsequent building permit review. The City requires dust control measures consistent with Best Management Practices pursuant to ECC 18.30. I. Property Line. Mr. O'Neal contends that the existing fence line defines the property line, even though the fence is approximately 1.3 feet north of the surveyed southern property boundary of the subject site (Ex. 4 and 9). The examiner has no authority to adjudicate boundary line disputes — Mr. O'Neal's likely recourse should he choose to pursue it would have to be a quiet title action in superior court. See Halverson v. Bellevue, 41 Wn. App. 457 (1985). Staff note the Title Report shows no pending quiet title actions against the subject property (Ex. 1, Att. 13 and Ex. 9). Staff further notes that even if Mr. O'Neal were to prevail in a claim of adverse possession, the proposed lots would still contain the minimum required area per ECDC 17.40.030(D). The Applicant intends to leave the existing fence line in place (Ex. 12). 6. Adequacy of Infrastructure and Public Services. As conditioned by this decision, adequate and appropriate infrastructure will serve development as follows: A. Drainage: The City's drainage standards impose detailed requirements that mandate that the development maintain pre -development off -site stormwater flow volumes and velocities. Consequently, no adverse impacts to adjoining properties are anticipated. A preliminary drainage assessment, Ex. 1, Att. 9, has been completed for the project and reviewed by engineering staff. Based on the preliminary assessment, the general preliminary plat design can accommodate the stormwater facilities necessary to control drainage. More detailed engineering and construction of required improvements will be installed prior to approval of the final plat. The Applicant plans to infiltrate stormwater at the site. However, a condition of approval in the Engineering Memorandum of Compliance (Ex. 15), requires the Applicant to connect all impervious surfaces to storm systems which may or may not be required to connect to the public system, depending on the feasibility of infiltration. B. Transportation: Vehicular access to Lot 1 is proposed to be directly off of 13th Way SW, while Lots 2 through 5 would gain access via a shared vehicular access tract (Tract 999), which will not be a hi hway, arterial or collector street. Tract 999 will enter the site from 13t Way SW. Trip generation is designated under City standards as not significant enough to require a traffic impact study. Given the moderate trip generation and that Tracts 2-5 access Tract 999 and only Lot 1 accesses 13th Way SW directly, transportation impacts are minimized and access and congestion are adequately addressed. C. Parks and Open Space: According to ECDC 20.75.090, before or concurrent with the approval of the final plat of any subdivision, the subdivider shall Preliminary Plat p. 6 Findings, Conclusions and Decision Packet Pg. 200 1 7.3.c 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 dedicate land, pay a fee in -lieu of dedication, or do a combination of both, for park and recreational purposes. With the adoption of Ordinance 3934 in 2013, park impacts are now addressed through the assessment of park impact fees in accordance with Edmonds City Code (ECC) Chapter 3.36. No park dedication or fees are required with the subdivision. Park impact fees will be assessed with issuance of the future building permits on the new lots consistent with ECC 3.36. D. Water and Sewer: Water and sewer will be provided by the Olympic View Water and Sewer District. The staff report does not identify whether there is adequate capacity to serve the proposed development, but given its small scale it is safe to presume that is the case. Olympic View Water and Sewer District reviewed the application and raised no capacity concerns (Ex. 1, Att. 23). The applicant will need to work with Olympic View Water and Sewer District during the civil construction plan review phase to ensure any applicable requirements from Olympic View Water and Sewer District have been met. E. Schools and Sidewalks: The subject parcel is primarily served by three area schools: Sherwood Elementary School, College Place Middle School, and Edmonds Woodway High School. Bus service is provided to all three schools. The bus stop for service to/from Sherwood Elementary School is located at the intersection of 8th Ave. S and 13th Way SW. The bus stop for service to/from College Place Middle School and Edmonds Woodway High School is located at the intersection of 8th Ave. S and 14th St. SW. There is also a bus stop for service from Edmonds Woodway High School located at the intersection of 7th Pl. S and 15th St. SW. Though there are sidewalks in the vicinity, they do not lead from the subject to all of the bus stops. There are sidewalks along the bus stop to Sherwood Elementary School. Sidewalks are discontinuous along the route to the bus stops for College Place Middle School and Edmonds Woodway High School at 8th and 14th. However, sidewalks are continuous from 8th and 14th to 15th and 7th. Sidewalks are not required adjacent to the subject site per the Engineering Requirements (Ex. 1, Att. 21). Sidewalks are only required on one side of 13th Way SW, and sidewalk alignment has already been established along the north side of the road. Since the subject site is located on the south side of 13th Way SW, sidewalks are not required along the frontage of the subject site. There is no direct evidence in the record on the safety of walking conditions to the school bus stops. Since the availability of sidewalks to the bus stops is not continuous, safety is a valid point of concern. The limited evidence in the record establishes that more likely than not walking conditions to and from the bus stops are safe. The available evidence shows that vehicular traffic is Preliminary Plat p. 7 Findings, Conclusions and Decision Packet Pg. 201 1 7.3.c 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 minor and there are no apparent pedestrian hazards present. The aerial photographs and vicinity map in the stormwater report (Ex. 1, att.9), critical area documentation (Ex. 1, att. 17) and separate aerial exhibit (Ex.l, att. 24) show the surrounding streets to only serve single-family development with no major through streets present. The gaps in sidewalks are fairly nominal and the fact that street standards don't require sidewalks on project street frontage evidences a legislative determination that sidewalks on both sides of the street are not necessary for safety in these types of environments. The staff report, and engineering conditions don't identify any sidewalks for the interior private access road, however, the design drawings, Ex. 13, do show a road cross-section that appears to at least propose a two foot shoulder along the private access road. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Procedural: 1. Authority of Hearing Examiner. ECDC 20.01.003 provides the Hearing Examiner with the authority to hold a hearing and issue a final decision on preliminary subdivision applications, classifying them as Type III-B applications. Substantive: 2. Zoning n�. The subject property is zoned Single -Family Residential (RS-6). 3. Review Criteria and Application. Chapter 20.75 ECDC governs the review criteria for subdivisions. Relevant criteria are quoted below and applied through corresponding conclusions of law. ECDC 20.75.080: General Findings. A proposed subdivision may be approved only if all of the following general findings can be made for the proposal, as approved or as conditionally approved: A. Subdivision Ordinance. The proposal is consistent with the purposes of this chapter (as listed in ECDC 20.75.020) and meets all requirements of this chapter. 4. The proposal, as conditioned, is consistent with ECDC 20.75.020 and the requirements of the ECDC subdivision chapter. The proposal is consistent with ECDC 20.75.020 because it will not generate any significant adverse impacts as determined in Finding of Fact No. 5 and will be served by adequate infrastructure as determined in Finding of Fact No. 6. Staff will verify the adequacy of legal descriptions and monuments during civil review. As to compliance with the Preliminary Plat P. 8 Findings, Conclusions and Decision Packet Pg. 202 1 7.3.c 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 requirements of Chapter 20.75 ECDC, this decision addresses all pertinent requirements and finds the proposal consistent with all such requirements. B. Comprehensive Plan. The proposal is consistent with the provisions of the Edmonds Comprehensive Plan, or other adopted city policy, and is in the public interest. 5. The proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan for all the reasons specified on Pages 4-5 of the Staff Report (Ex. 1.), adopted herein as if set out in full. C. Zoning Ordinance. The proposal meets all requirements of the zoning ordinance, or a modification has been approved as provided for in this chapter. 6. The proposal is consistent with the Zoning Ordinance (ECDC 16.20.030) for the reasons specified on pages 5-7 of the Staff Report (Ex. 1), adopted herein as if set out in full. D. Floodplain Management. The proposal meets all requirements of the Edmonds Community Development Code relating to floodplain management. 7. The proposed project is not located within a designated flood plain management area. ECDC 20.75.085(A): Environmental. 1. Where environmental resources exist, such as trees, streams, ravines or wildlife habitats, the proposal shall be designed to minimize significant adverse impacts to the resources. Permanent restrictions may be imposed on the proposal to avoid impact. 2. The proposal shall be designed to minimize grading by using shared driveways and by relating street, house site and lot placement to the existing topography. 3. Where conditions exist which could be hazardous to the future residents of the land to be divided, or to nearby residents or property, such as flood plains, steep slopes or unstable soil or geologic conditions, a subdivision of the hazardous land shall be denied unless the condition can be permanently corrected, consistent with paragraphs A(1) and (2) of this section. 4. The proposal shall be designed to minimize off -site impacts on drainage, views and so forth. Preliminary Plat P. 9 Findings, Conclusions and Decision Packet Pg. 203 1 7.3.c 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 8. The criterion is satisfied. As determined in Finding of Fact No 5, as conditioned there are no significant adverse environmental impacts associated with the project and there are no environmental resources on or near the site. Impacts to trees and native vegetation are addressed through compliance with the City's native vegetation retention standards, ECDC 23.90.040(C), as discussed at page 5 of the staff report. As further determined in Finding of Fact No. 5(D), the proposal minimizes grading through use of a shared private access tract to serve all proposed lots. As determined in Finding of Fact No. 5(B), there are no adverse view impacts created by the proposal and the project site has no hazardous conditions (Finding of Fact 5(B) and (E)). A preliminary drainage plan was submitted with the preliminary plat, (Ex. 1, Att. 9) and as determined in FOF No. 6(A) the proposed drainage facilities have been determined to be adequate. ECDC 20.75.085(B): Lot and Street Layout. 1. Lots shall be designed to contain a usable building area. If the building area would be difficult to develop, the lot shall be redesigned or eliminated, unless special conditions can be imposed on the approval which will ensure that the lot is developed properly. 2. Lots shall not front on highways, arterials or collector streets unless there is no other feasible access. Special access provisions, such as shared driveways, turnarounds or frontage streets may be required to minimize traffic hazards. 3. Each lot shall meet the applicable dimensional requirements of the zoning ordinance. 4. Pedestrian walks or bicycle paths shall be provided to serve schools, parks, public facilities, shorelines and streams where street access is not adequate. 9. The criteria quoted above are met. As determined in the staff report, all proposed lots meet the dimensional requirements of the RS-6 zoning district. Each lot contains a buildable area as is readily evident from the plat map, Ex. 13, and the fact that the project site is relatively level without any environmental constraints. The proposed lots do not front on any highways, arterials or collector streets. The access road does not meet City road standards and is therefore not required to have the full frontage profile. The proposal provides for adequate and safe sidewalks for the reasons identified in Finding of Fact No. 6(E). . ECDC 20.75.085(C): Dedications. 1. The city council may require dedication of land in the proposed subdivision for public use. Preliminary Plat P. 10 Findings, Conclusions and Decision Packet Pg. 204 1 7.3.c 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 2. Only the city council may approve a dedication of park land to satisfy the requirements of ECDC 20.75.090. The council may request a review and written recommendation from the planning advisory board. 3. Any approval of a subdivision shall be conditioned on appropriate dedication of land for streets, including those on the official street map and the preliminary plat. 10. To meet City street standards the Applicant is required to make a 10-foot roadway dedication along the proposal's northern property line (Ex. 15.). This dedication is reflected in the preliminary plat map (Ex. 13). ECDC 20.75.085(D): Improvements. 1. Improvements which may be required, but are not limited to, streets, curbs, pedestrian walks and bicycle paths, sidewalks, street landscaping, water lines, sewage systems, drainage systems and underground utilities. 2. The person or body approving a subdivision shall determine the improvements necessary to meet the purposes and requirements of this chapter, and the requirements of: a. ECDC Title 18 Public Works Requirements; b. Chapter 19.75, Fire Code, as to fire hydrants, water supply and access. This determination shall be based on the recommendations of the community development director, the public works director, and the fire chief. 11. The project has undergone extensive review by the community development director, the public works director (specifically engineering) and Fire District No. 1. A number of improvements have been recommended as a result of this review and they have been incorporated into the conditions of approval (via requiring compliance with Ex. 15) and have been found to provide for adequate public infrastructure in FOF No. 6. Further, since RCW 58.17.110 mandates that preliminary plats may not be approved absent a finding of adequate infrastructure, the criterion above is broadly construed to require the findings required by RCW 58.17.110 and those findings are met for the reasons identified in FOF No. 6. ECDC 20.75.085(E): Flood Plain Management. All subdivision proposals shall comply with the criteria set forth in the Edmonds Community Development Code for flood plain management. 12. This project is not in a Flood Plain Management area. Preliminary Plat P. 11 Findings, Conclusions and Decision Packet Pg. 205 1 7.3.c 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 DECISION All subdivision criteria are met, and the subdivision is approved as proposed in Ex. 13 and 14, subject to the following conditions: 1. This application is subject to all applicable requirements contained in the Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC). It is the responsibility of the applicant to ensure compliance with all applicable requirements. 2. The applicant is responsible for obtaining all local, state, and/or federal permits or approvals applicable to the proposal. 3. The existing single-family residence and associated improvements must be demolished prior to final approval of the subdivision. Contact the Building Division for demolition permit requirements prior to conducting such work. 4. Prior to recording, the applicant must complete the following requirements: a) Civil plans must be approved prior to recording. In completing the civil plans, the following must be addressed: i. Complete the Engineering Division conditions listed "Required as a Condition of Subdivision" on Ex. 1, Attachment 21 and as revised by Ex. 15, the revised requirements memorandum. ii. Comply with the applicable requirements stated in the Fire District memorandum in Attachment 19. iii. A tree cutting plan shall be submitted and approved with the civil plans for removal of trees impacted by the subdivision improvements. Any tree cutting proposed on the site that is not a hazardous situation and/or not necessary as part of the subdivision improvements shall be reviewed at the time of building permit application or through the appropriate land use permit application and review process. All trees that are to be retained during the development process and trees located on adjacent properties must be protected according to the performance standards found in ECDC 18.45.050.H. If during construction it is realized that certain trees that were planned to be retained will be damaged due to the construction activities, replacement may be required per ECDC 18.45.050.F. iv. The Applicant must provide an arborist report describing the general hazards represented by each tree and by the cumulative effect of removing the trees. b) Make the following revisions to the plat: i. Indicate the locations of all new easements, and provide easement descriptions and maintenance provisions for all new easements. Preliminary Plat p. 12 Findings, Conclusions and Decision Packet Pg. 206 1 7.3.c 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ii. Indicate the gross and net areas of each lot on the final plat. iii. Include on the plat all required information, including owner's certification, hold harmless agreement, Development Services and Public Works director's approval blocks. iv. Make sure all documents to be recorded meet the Snohomish County Auditor's requirements for recording. 5. Submit an updated copy of the title report (plat certificate) with the documents proposed to be recorded. The title report must be prepared within 30 days of submittal for final review. 6. Submit two copies of the documents to be recorded for the Planning Division and Engineering Division's approval. Once approved, the documents must be recorded with the Snohomish County Auditor's office. 7. After recording the plat, the applicant must complete the following: a) Complete the Engineering Division conditions listed "Required as a Condition of Building Permit" in Ex. 1, Attachment 21 and as revised by Ex. 15, the revised requirements memorandum. Dated this 9th day of November 2017. Plu'r A.01brachts City of Edmonds Hearing Examiner Appeal Right and Valuation Notices A party of record may submit a written appeal of a Type III-B decision within 14 days the date of issuance of the decision. The appeal will be heard at a closed record revi before the City Council according to the requirements of ECDC Chapter 20.07. Affected property owners may request a change in valuation for property tax notwithstanding any program of revaluation. Preliminary Plat p. 13 Findings, Conclusions and Decision Packet Pg. 207 1 7.3.d CITY OF EDMONDS ENGINEERING DIVISION Date: April 26, 2019 To: Mike Clugston, Senior Planner From: Jeanie McConnell, Engineering Program Manager Subject: PLN20170028, Jenkins Lane - Final Plat 720 —13t' Way SW — 5 lot Plat The Engineering Division has found that the subject 5-lot plat meets the requirements established for civil subdivision improvements in accordance with Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) 20.75. The Hearing Examiner's Decision, which provided preliminary plat approval, was issued on November 9, 2017 and included engineering conditions of approval. Civil construction plans were submitted to the Engineering Division on December 22, 2017 consistent with the conditions of approval and ECDC 20.75.120. The plans were approved for construction on June 21, 2018. The improvements shown on the approved plans have not yet been constructed in their entirety. Consistent with ECDC 20.75.130, a performance bond has been posted as surety that these improvements will be completed within 12 months following recording of the plat. A performance bond was submitted by the developer and accepted by the City on August 31, 2018 reflecting the total cost to construct all required improvements in the amount of $231,708.00. As a condition of development the subject plat will dedicate a 10-foot strip of property as public street to the City of Edmonds along 131h Way SW. The dedication was reviewed by the Council's Planning, Parks and Public Works committee on January 23, 2018 and approval was given to forward to the full council. Consistent with ECDC 18.30.090, a permanent access easement has been granted to the City of Edmonds for access to the private stormwater facility located in Tract 999. Access is for inspection purposes to ensure that stormwater facilities are properly operated and maintained in accordance with City of Edmonds Code. Thank you. City of Edmonds Packet Pg. 208 8.1 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 05/7/2019 Development Activities Update Staff Lead: Shane Hope Department: Development Services Preparer: Diane Cunningham Background/History Highlights of Development Services activities are presented to the City Council each spring. Staff Recommendation N/A Narrative A presentation will be given on May 7 to highlight: (1) Permit data (2) Development projects Permit data In 2018, the number of building permits and permit revenues were down a little from 2017. Regardless, 2018 numbers were still strong --and the revenues were higher than any of the previous "peak years" of 2004-2007. Development protects Updates on 23 development projects in town are included in the presentation. Attachments: Deve_Serv_Pres_2019 Packet Pg. 209 8.1.a SHANE HOPE Development Services Director DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES r Q CITYOF EDM Development S Packet Pg. 210 8.1.a s� J w ir 71 Counter service, pre - application meetings, intake appointments. a� R s?. a� 2 r 0 Q c E Q 0 0) > r i N d 0 N I N L a I L 0^ v! I 0 E M a CITY OF EDM Development 5 Packet Pg. 211 PrE application Meetings 5 31T :1:�iTriiiiiT: L t� Q r+ C CL E O. O d d G 7 � T •> d u w � T 0 N - L IL _ oI m d c c m E z a Packet Pg. 213 V . w 00 o� v o Q Cr Vb • KI& Permit history, valuation of activities, solar, impact fees and general facility charges (GFC) CITYOF EDM Packet Pg. 214 Development S Development Services Permit History $2,000,000 $1,800,000 $1,600,000 $1,400,000 $1,200,000 $1,000,000 $800,000 $600,000 $400,000 $200,000 $0 1,800 1,600 1,400 1,200 1,000 800 600 400 200 0 Wn 110 l- 00 01 O N M W) l- 00 O - N M Wn "O l- 00 01 O N M kn 00 00 00 00 00 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 Q1 Q1 D1 D1 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O --� --� --� --� --� --� --� --� --� --� --� --� •--� � ^-a N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Total Devel Svc Revenue # Building Permits CITY OF EDM packet Pg. 215 Development 5 8.1.a Permits Reviewed by development services 2017 vs. 2018 Type of Permit 2017 2018 2017 2018 # Issued # Issued Valuation Valuation New Single Family Duplex Apartment/Condo Commercial Mixed Use (Office/condo) Additions / Alterations Single Family Apartment / Condo Commercial Other Mechanical / Plumbing Demolition Miscellaneous Total 60 57 $2111831868 $2190639845 2 (4units) 2 (4units) $788,348 $935,029 1 (9units) 1 ( 4units) $8931224 $4021926 1 1 $7,549,151 $2,619,780 2(111units) 0 $14,756,385 0 159 143 $8,9471055 $9081843 21 15 $3,654,817 $78501 63 50 $1213 84,817 $101100,15 8 431/414 23 581 1774 413/442 24 482 1646 $171224,983 $87,3829648 CU 4 E 0. 0 0 0 2 0 N I V) L a I co N' 0 E a $3,051,647 $48 I Packet Pg. 216 8.1.a Engineering Division Right-of-way, side sewer, street use, and encroachment activity 2016-18 2016 Permits Issued 429 Permit Revenue $581082 Inspection & Review Revenue $214,337 2017 415 $42,806 $416,959 $58,221 $249,427 CU 2 a E 0. 0 r 0 r O N I N L a I L U) I 0 E a CITYOF EDM packet Pg. 217 Development 5 8.1.a IMPACT FEES AND GENERAL FACILITY CHARGES (GEC's) FOR 2018 Transportation Impact Fees $2011348.49 Parks Impact Fees $1521152.79 Water GFC $196,293.00 Sewer GFC $400,755.78 Storm GFC $35,991.22 CITYOF EDM Development SA Packet Pg. 218 Solar Permits N N Year # of Permits # of Permits Online % Online kW a E 0. 0 2012 3 0 0% 11 0 2013 6 5 83% 41 0 2014 39 35 90% 241 2015 32 29 91% 211 0 NI N N L 2016 17 16 94% 137 . 2017 0 0 0% 0 > 0 2018 3 2 67% 28.7 E Totals 100 87 87% 669.7 a CITYOF EDM Packet Pg. 219 Development S 1 � � 1 l r _age 8.1.a -• ' Y ir inspections •Q - # IL kperformed _ - • Development'" - -op 7 _ y i 1 I 0. _ r-1 R = 7,552 0 a }' 0 Building ,i _ i - � s _ '� Inspections N •� &mpg-_ +• L r_ ` •�- {� 3J58 LI . • ~ �� •L• Engineering o •I 1 I Y ..`1 L' �. Y 4 .. T L L r� . • C •r I 1 . �1� 1 •�- �� - # Inspections E 4LF• 1 r CITY OF EDM s Development S Packet Pg. 220 � f o jw o � c 0 N m M ■ �M M Key projects rn 0 N N N L a CITYOF EDM Development S Packet Pg. 221 wM Post Office Mixed Use Beach Walk Apts. .;C i Waterfront w Center Marine Retail ** * *Civic Field Graphite Art ' HomeStreet Bank` Westhaven Pla Northpoint* (Recovery ItCummings Apts.* .a iim q Paradise Heights 11ror Westgate Westgat *Woods ill i &,� Sim Nyland Apts. ,10 Meitzner * Plat 4r Woodwa Court- 1 Doug's Mazda GRE Apartments �Arii IWAM I 8.1.a t a Kid's Pbundatic /Academ, Edmonds Village I Packet Pg. 222 1 }4. v$ Point Edwardbldg. #10 '" 68 Units Pine St. a L._ COM MA I A 4-/A w1 - Beachwall Apartments �F Lr 4 y ' r F .v 9 Units Edmonds Way 11 T I I I �u �„-.r• tr+Lu ' .... ..,, yr .141.E - ':ate 1i.1R1i�1�...-. .. - � v.�:�`5: •+: r,�. COMM fi Imp I MR 7w NorthDOir it e cover �idrqlftmn Tenant Improvement 212th St. �t. ;L;a Completecs . Packet Pg. 225 ............... Post OffiCE phase II 1'"q I 1. n"il, �idil ff IvW Ou - f •l 1 f1_ 28 Units + 75600 sf New Commercial Main St. FD I Pg. 226 `�V, I':p ��k� 3 CL d CL Q0 . d OPENIN-a -- JLY 2019 _ a �� rn i s r -- ` NI — N r r`• '• low i e � ills.• �dl Packet Pg. 227 Doug's Mazda 12,000 sf New Commercial Highway 99 M II E,,IU- A A i 5.� pygl� Constr-,m,,-,'-:AoftNO% z ' 228 acket P.S► Cumming. Apartments rM NO to% _+[ 4 New Residential Units 72ndAve W I !, L W I I `� law '! - Constructiol WOODS 4 COFFEE � I V L AGE m �v V a N d 'a+ t� Q r+ C d E Q O - > d G pwr -; T O Mh NNd 1.6 r 04 �i• N L a r NI I N d r C d E t v R r r Q CITYOF EDV P cket Pg. 230 Development Meitzne Plat 11 New Residential Units 244th St. SW Issued Kids Founda i le 4'' >yiY F w. 7 Change of Use 76thAve W i ion Academy -� 0 Issued ST SW i I I I , I W I I i I I I I Q If � I � 3 �W� II II I I 3D.00' Mr PLAr 3-02-204 NO. 2003072550011 4 215M PL SW ._ i a� Cu s?. a� 2 Q c aD Q O d > C O N m r O N I N i a >I L O^ v! I > M ci CITYOF EDM Packet Pg. 233 Development 5 GRE Apartments I Y its 0 � , ■, too go .,, , `M a'o �-.000 wooer 192 New Residential Units Highway 99 'A P goad - I Tft.— .ft qj r r VA .•� _ .�• do 01 ��. . a C Packet Pg. 234 Paradise Heights I !B 1 12 New Residential Units Paradise Lane IBM 101 Applied 8.1.a Ah F rl—A IJJII/ltiJJtt� ; yJ�/ /I�IrIMrf m Packet Pg. 236 Edmonds Crossing . •"j `.... IIIIE 10 New Residential Units Edmonds Way Design Reviel Kisai Apartments M oil 18 New esidential Units Edmonds Way DC esign Revie Graphite Studios i Artist studios, art gallery, cafe, + 3 residential units Main St. 0 0 NOW. n. o oil Design Review Civic Field Sprague St AL Rw r e 4 1 h r _ M EADOWS THE GREAT LAWN MAW 1 i Sprague St 'Mat, Edmonds' 140n., Master Pla 40 AhyAh milt kit �Jjw ll%l Retaii, restaurant event space 011111110 I w cu 2 U CL 0 LA (D w I Ch IL U) Packet Pg. 241 1 New Downtown Restaurants i Alt J Ob, �4 mom 1 zi-�t�mj Mimi Future Cafe" / Restaurant ii ®■ .���i�1i ���+if �i I�f�iil� �I� 1� fills 1! ,�l 1 Kelnero W I 1n1I7ev,noi'lniil:i M E do -E —- 0 I - v - - PAIRING .N ©— > � r r Q CITYOF EDM Development 5 Packet Pg. 243 Nev Single Family Homes f. may• �� �. S•• ilk 44�� LLb Ox a mr � U _� US - or A W 1N 184th St. SW 236th St. SW Ah Am hik 40 --r- owa. i Ah �r J N a` 1 r Q CITY OF EDV Packet Pg. 245 Development 8.1.a ViLaW:univM.ta0 0urW Ah r Q CITYOF EDM Development S Packet Pg. 2 66 Port Marine Reta P_ I R MR r1ilL N, . 6,650 New Commercial "W Ef On -hold Homestree Bank ■om USE AL JL 01_� 6,763 sf New Commercial On -hold THANKYOU r Q CITYOF EDM Development Packet Pg. 249 / S 8.2 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 05/7/2019 Fund Balance / Reserve Policy Discussion Staff Lead: Scott James Department: Administrative Services Preparer: Scott James Background/History The City Council Finance Committee last reviewed the draft Fund Balance Policy on March 12, 2019. Here are the key takeaways: Finance Committee has the opinion that the Risk Management Reserve can be discontinued and balance of the Risk Management Reserve can be combined with the General Fund. The chart below shows use of Risk Management funds over the past five years. Ultimately, after Council discusses this as a study item, it will need to be brought back to Council for a formal vote to either keep or discontinue the fund. Prior Five Year of Risk Management Fund Expe History % of General Fund Revenue Year Expenditures Description of Use Budget 2018 $0 None Expended 0.0% 2017 581,277 Clans Settlement 0.2% 2016 SO None Expended 0.0% 2015 571,528 Claim Settlement 0.2% 2014 $0 None Expended 0.0% There was consensus we need clearer financial policies to guide us as we move forward, especially with regard to fund balance and reserves. MRSC recommends reserves of at least 16% of operating expenses. There is currently a fairly wide range of reserve levels in nearby cities. Each city needs to consider how much risk they are willing to take as they establish reserve levels. Those that have stable revenue streams are prone to take more risk by maintaining reserve levels below 16% while those with greater revenue volatility have a more conservative approach and maintain reserves higher than that level. Attached to this Agenda Memo is a Fund Balance Reserve Policy Summary From Other Cities. There was agreement we need to keep our policies as simple as possible, recognizing there is a need for at enough detail to inform future administrators and Councilmembers of terminology and the need for certain reserve funds. The Committee agreed our policies should strive to maintain sufficient reserve levels to sustain city operations during economic downturns or natural disasters while not being excessive, as we don't want to create a "dead money" situation. The essential thing here is for Council to come to agree on what we believe is "sufficient" for reserve levels. Packet Pg. 250 8.2 The updated draft policy now calls for a total combined fund reserves not to exceed 20% of the Adopted General Fund Operating Revenue Budget. The 20% fund balance target shall 1) not exceed the limitations set forth by RCW 35A.33.145, which sets the statutory maximum at $0.375 per $1,000 of assessed valuation and 2) when combined with the General Fund Operating Reserve, the two fund balance reserves shall not exceed 20% of the General Fund's Adopted Annual Revenue Operating Budget. In other words, if the General Fund Operating Reserve balance equals 16% of operating budget, then the Contingent Reserve Fund balance cannot exceed 4% of the operating budget The current Fund Balance policy does not incorporate Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Pronouncement No.54. This pronouncement mandates the inclusion of Fund Balance Classifications in the City's Annual Financial Report (CAFR). The attachment includes a summary of this Pronouncement. Please see attachment: GASB 54 Fund Balance Classifications Summary. Staff Recommendation Review Amended policy and supporting documents, provide feedback and recommendations. Narrative N/A Attachments: Reserve Policy GASB 54 Fund Balance Classifications Summary RCW 35A.33.145 Contingency Reserve Fund Limitations GFOA Fund Balance Guidelines for the General Fund Fund Balance Reserve Policy Summary From Other Cities Draft Fund Balance Reserve Policy Which Finance Policies Work Best It Depends 2019 May 7 Council Fund Balance Presentation Packet Pg. 251 8.2.a 1.0 2.0 3.0 Subject: Reserve Policy CITY OF EDMONDS RESERVE POLICY Original Policy Date: Originating Department: Finance Division Last Revision Date: PURPOSE: To establish a Reserve Policy for the City which is capable of addressing the various types (categories) of the City's operating and restricted use funds. The objectives of this Policy are to (i) provide a clear understanding of the goals and objectives of reserve establishment, (ii) offer guidance and limitations regarding the establishment, use and replenishment of City reserves, and (iii) establish a process for periodic reporting and review of City reserves. ORANANIZATION AFFECTED: All City funds. REFERENCES: GENERAL FUND RESERVE POLICY: The General Fund is used to account for all general revenues of the City not specifically levied or collected for other City funds, and for expenditures related to providing general services by the City. For the purpose of this policy and as it applies to the General Fund only, the City will establish a Contingency Reserve Fund with a minimum balance of 8% of annual General Fund revenues. At no time, however, shall the balance in the Contingency Reserve Fund fall below 8% unless specifically waived by the City Council because of an unforeseen emergency. The City shall maintain a targeted balance of 16% of annual General Fund revenues. 4.1 If actual expenditures in the General Fund are less than budgeted expenditures, and the General Fund does not end the year at a deficit, at least 5% of the difference between actual revenue and actual expenditures will revert to the Contingency Reserve Fund and may then be re -appropriated at the discretion of the City Council. 4.2 The City will annually direct a minimum of 5% of sales tax receipts from new construction (NAICS Industry Classification Code 23) to the Contingency Reserve Fund, up to $100,000 per year. Packet Pg. 252 8.2.a 4.3 Total annual transfers to the Contingency Reserve Fund shall not be more than 125% of the amounts calculated in Sections 4.0, 4.1 and 4.2 above. Once funded up to the 16% target, there shall be no limitation on the maximum annual contribution to the Contingency Reserve Fund. 4.4 Use of Contingency Reserve Fund — To the extent that there is an imbalance in the General Fund between budgeted revenues and budgeted expenditures, City Council and administration will strive to address the imbalance first with revenue increases, expenditure reductions, or a combination of the two. Use of the Contingency Reserve Fund is a one-time, non -recurring funding source. If an imbalance in the General Fund occurs that cannot be addressed with additional revenues or expenditure reductions, a multiyear plan shall be developed to address the imbalance concurrently with the planned reserve draw down of the Contingency Fund. The implementation of the replenishment plan will be done in accordance with the guidelines below (see "Replenishment of Reserves"). A planned draw down of the fund's reserves should: a) not exceed 50% of the balance in the Contingency Reserve Fund, and b) not reduce the reserve below 4% of annual General Fund revenues. 4.5 Replenishment of Reserves — The following criteria will be used to restore the Contingency Reserve Fund based upon the remaining fund balance compared to the minimum reserve guideline: 1. If the reserves are drawn down by 25-50% of reserve fund balance, then a budgetary plan shall be implemented to return the reserve level to between 75% and 100% of the minimum balance over a 5 to 7 year period. 2. If the reserves are drawn down by 10-25% of reserve fund balance, then the budgetary plan to restore the reserve shall be structured over a 3 to 5 year period. 3. If the reserves are drawn down by 0-10% of reserve fund balance, then a solution to replenish to at least the minimum shall be structured over a 1 to 3 year period. 4.6 Annual Status Reporting and Periodic Review — Annually, after presentation of the City's Comprehensive Annual Financial Report, the Finance Director will prepare and present an updated Reserve Level Status report by August 1 st of the following year. 4.7 At least every five years, the Mayor, based on advice from the Finance Director, will ask the City Council to reaffirm or revise this policy, including the percentages established herein. 2 Packet Pg. 253 8.2.a 5.0 RISK MANAGEMENT RESERVE POLICY: 5.1. The City shall maintain a Risk Management Reserve Fund dedicated to mitigation of the risk of loss arising from potential claims and lawsuits against the City for general liability purposes as well as claims resulting from natural disasters such as earthquakes. Amounts not needed for current or estimated future claims will be made available along with the Contingency Reserve Fund in Section 4 for unanticipated expenditures or significant declines in actual revenue versus budgeted revenue. 5.2. The Risk Management Reserve Fund shall be set at 2% of annual General Fund revenues. The City shall reach the target of 2% no later than fiscal year 2014. 5.3. Legal claims expenses incurred below the City's insurance deductible amounts will be paid for out of the Risk Management Reserve Fund. Uninsured legal claim expenses will also be deducted from the Risk Management Reserve Fund. 5.4. Use of the Risk Management Reserve Fund — A draw down of the fund's reserves should: a) not exceed 50% of the balance in the Risk Management Reserve Fund, and b) not reduce the reserve below 0.5% of annual General Fund revenues. Council may grant exceptions to this limitation on draw down of reserves at its discretion. Any exception granted will be adopted as part of the City's annual budgeting process. 5.5. Replenishment of Reserves — The following criteria will be used to restore the Risk Management Reserve Fund based upon the remaining fund balance compared to the minimum reserve guideline: 1. If the reserves are drawn down by 25-50% of reserve fund balance, then a budgetary plan shall be implemented to return the reserve level to between 75% and 100% of the minimum balance over a 3 to 5 year period. 2. If the reserves are drawn down by 10-25% of reserve fund balance, then the budgetary plan to restore the reserve shall be structured over a 2 to 3 year period. 3. If the reserves are drawn down by 0-10% of reserve fund balance, then a solution to replenish to at least the minimum shall be structured over a 1 to 2 year period. 5.6. The City Council may, at their discretion and as necessary, transfer funds between the Contingency Reserve Fund and the Risk Management Reserve Fund. Once the two reserve funds are fully funded up to the minimum levels as established within this policy, at no time will the combined balances of both funds decline below 8% of annual General Fund revenues without adopting of a replenishment plan. Packet Pg. 254 8.2.b GASB 54 Fund Balance Classifications Summar The objective of this Statement is to enhance the usefulness of fund balance information by providing clearer fund balance classifications that can be more consistently applied and by clarifying the existing governmental fund type definitions. This Statement establishes fund balance classifications that comprise a hierarchy based primarily on the extent to which a government is bound to observe constraints imposed upon the use of the resources reported in governmental funds. The initial distinction that is made in reporting fund balance information is identifying amounts that are considered nonspendable, such as fund balance associated with inventories. This Statement also provides for additional classification as restricted, committed, assigned, and unassigned based on the relative strength of the constraints that control how specific amounts can be spent. The restricted fund balance category includes amounts that can be spent only for the specific purposes stipulated by constitution, external resource providers, or through enabling legislation. The committed fund balance classification includes amounts that can be used only for the specific purposes determined by a formal action of the government's highest level of decision -making authority. Amounts in the assigned fund balance classification are intended to be used by the government for specific purposes but do not meet the criteria to be classified as restricted or committed. In governmental funds other than the general fund, assigned fund balance represents the remaining amount that is not restricted or committed. Unassigned fund balance is the residual classification for the government's general fund and includes all spendable amounts not contained in the other classifications. In other funds, the unassigned classification should be used only to report a deficit balance resulting from overspending for specific purposes for which amounts had been restricted, committed, or assigned. Governments are required to disclose information about the processes through which constraints are imposed on amounts in the committed and assigned classifications. Governments also are required to classify and report amounts in the appropriate fund balance classifications by applying their accounting policies that determine whether restricted, committed, assigned, and unassigned amounts are considered to have been spent. Disclosure of the policies in the notes to the financial statements is required. This Statement also provides guidance for classifying stabilization amounts on the face of the balance sheet and requires disclosure of certain information about stabilization arrangements in the notes to the financial statements. How the Changes in This Statement Will Improve Financial Reporting The requirements in this Statement will improve financial reporting by providing fund balance categories and classifications that will be more easily understood. Elimination of the reserved component of fund balance in favor of a restricted classification will enhance the consistency between information reported in the government -wide statements and information in the governmental fund financial statements and avoid confusion about the relationship between reserved fund balance and restricted net assets. The fund balance classification approach in this Statement will require governments to classify amounts consistently, regardless of the fund type or column in which they are presented. As a result, an amount cannot be classified as restricted in one fund but unrestricted in another. The fund balance disclosures will give users information necessary to understand the Packet Pg. 255 8.2.b processes under which constraints are imposed upon the use of resources and how those constraints may be modified or eliminated. The clarifications of the governmental fund type definitions will reduce uncertainty about which resources can or should be reported in the respective fund types. Nonsoendable Fund Balance The nonspendable fund balance classification includes amounts that cannot be spent because they are either (a) not in spendable form or (b) legally or contractually required to be maintained intact. The "not in spendable form" criterion includes items that are not expected to be converted to cash, for example, inventories and prepaid amounts. It also includes the long-term amount of loans and notes receivable, as well as property acquired for resale. However, if the use of the proceeds from the collection of those receivables or from the sale of those properties is restricted, committed, or assigned, then they should be included in the appropriate fund balance classification (restricted, committed, or assigned), rather than nonspendable fund balance. The corpus (or principal) of a permanent fund is an example of an amount that is legally or contractually required to be maintained intact. Restricted Fund Balance Net Assets Restricted by Enabling Legislation, should be reported as restricted fund balance. Fund balance should be reported as restricted when constraints placed on the use of resources are either: a. Externally imposed by creditors (such as through debt covenants), grantors, contributors, or laws or regulations of other governments; or Imposed by law through constitutional provisions or enabling legislation. Enabling legislation, as the term is used in this Statement, authorizes the government to assess, levy, charge, or otherwise mandate payment of resources (from external resource providers) and includes a legally enforceable requirement that those resources be used only for the specific purposes stipulated in the legislation. Legal enforceability means that a government can be compelled by an external party — such as citizens, public interest groups, or the judiciary —to use resources created by enabling legislation only for the purposes specified by the legislation. Committed Fund Balance Amounts that can only be used for specific purposes pursuant to constraints imposed by formal action of the government's highest level of decision -making authority should be reported as committed fund balance. Those committed amounts cannot be used for any other purpose unless the government removes or changes the specified use by taking the same type of action (for example, legislation, resolution, ordinance) it employed to previously commit those amounts. The authorization specifying the purposes for which amounts can be used should have the consent of both the legislative and executive branches of the government, if applicable. Committed fund balance also should incorporate contractual obligations to the extent that existing resources in the fund have been specifically committed for use in satisfying those contractual requirements. In contrast to fund balance that is restricted by enabling legislation, as discussed above, amounts in the committed fund balance classification may be redeployed for other purposes with appropriate due process, as explained below. Constraints imposed on the use of committed amounts are imposed by the government, separate from the authorization to raise the underlying revenue. Packet Pg. 256 8.2.b The formal action of the government's highest level of decision -making authority that commits fund balance to a specific purpose should occur prior to the end of the reporting period, but the amount, if any, which will be subject to the constraint, may be determined in the subsequent period. Assiened Fund Balance Amounts that are constrained by the government's intent to be used for specific purposes, but are neither restricted nor committed, should be reported as assigned fund balance, except for stabilization arrangements, as discussed below. Intent should be expressed by (a) the governing body itself or (b) a body (a budget or finance committee, for example) or official to which the governing body has delegated the authority to assign amounts to be used for specific purposes. Both the committed and assigned fund balance classifications include amounts that have been constrained to being used for specific purposes by actions taken by the government itself. However, the authority for making an assignment is not required to be the government's highest level of decision - making authority. Furthermore, the nature of the actions necessary to remove or modify an assignment is not as prescriptive as it is with regard to the committed fund balance classification. Constraints imposed on the use of assigned amounts are more easily removed or modified than those imposed on amounts that are classified as committed. Some governments may not have both committed and assigned fund balances, as not all governments have multiple levels of decision -making authority. Unassigned Fund Balance Unassigned fund balance is the residual classification for the general fund. This classification represents fund balance that has not been assigned to other funds and that has not been restricted, committed, or assigned to specific purposes within the general fund. The general fund should be the only fund that reports a positive unassigned fund balance amount. Stabilization Arraneements Some governments formally set aside amounts for use in emergency situations or when revenue shortages or budgetary imbalances arise. Those amounts are subject to controls that dictate the circumstances under which they can be spent. Many governments have formal arrangements to maintain amounts for budget or revenue stabilization, working capital needs, contingencies or emergencies, and other similarly titled purposes. The authority to set aside those amounts generally comes from statute, ordinance, resolution, charter, or constitution. Stabilization amounts may be expended only when certain specific circumstances exist. The formal action that imposes the parameters for spending should identify and describe the specific circumstances under which a need for stabilization arises. Those circumstances should be such that they would not be expected to occur routinely. For example, a stabilization amount that can be accessed "in an emergency" would not qualify to be classified within the committed category because the circumstances or conditions that constitute an emergency are not sufficiently detailed, and it is not unlikely that an "emergency" of some nature would routinely occur. Similarly, a stabilization amount that can be accessed to offset an "anticipated revenue shortfall" would not qualify unless the shortfall was quantified and was of a magnitude that would distinguish it from other revenue shortfalls that occur during the normal course of governmental operations. Packet Pg. 257 8.2.b Fund Balance Classification Policies and Procedures Governments should disclose the following about their fund balance classification policies and procedures in the notes to the financial statements: a. For committed fund balance: (1) the government's highest level of decision -making authority and (2) the formal action that is required to be taken to establish (and modify or rescind) a fund balance commitment b. For assigned fund balance: (1) the body or official authorized to assign amounts to a specific purpose and (2) the policy established by the governing body pursuant to which that authorization is given Governments that establish stabilization arrangements, should disclose the following information in the notes to the financial statements: a. The authority for establishing stabilization arrangements (for example, by statute or ordinance) b. The requirements for additions to the stabilization amount C. The conditions under which stabilization amounts may be spent d. The stabilization balance, if not apparent on the face of the financial statements. Minimum Fund Balance Policies If a governing body has formally adopted a minimum fund balance policy (for example, in lieu of separately setting aside stabilization amounts), the government should describe in the notes to its financial statements the policy established by the government that sets forth the minimum amount. Packet Pg. 258 RCW 35A.33.145: Contingency fund —Creation. Page 1 of 1 8.2.c RCW 35A.33.145 Contingency fund —Creation. Every code city may create and maintain a contingency fund to provide moneys with which to meet any municipal expense, the necessity or extent of which could not have been foreseen or reasonably evaluated at the time of adopting the annual budget, or from which to provide moneys for those emergencies described in RCW 35A.33.080 and 35A.33.090. Such fund may be supported by a budget appropriation from any tax or other revenue source not restricted in use by law, or also may be supported by a transfer from other unexpended or decreased funds made available by ordinance as set forth in RCW 35A.33.120: PROVIDED, That the total amount accumulated in such fund at any time shall not exceed the equivalent of thirty-seven and one-half cents per thousand dollars of assessed valuation of property within the city at such time. Any moneys in the contingency fund at the end of the fiscal year shall not lapse except upon reappropriation by the council to another fund in the adoption of a subsequent budget. [ 1973 1st ex.s. c 195 § 28; 1967 ex.s. c 119 § 35A.33.145.1 NOTES: Severability—Effective dates and termination dates—Construction-1973 1st ex.s. c 195: See notes following RCW 84.52.043. http://app.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=35A.33.145 Packet Pg. 259 4/20/2018 8.2.d Government Finonce Officers Associotion Fund Balance Guidelines for the General Fund Type: Best Practice Background: In the context of financial reporting, the term fund balance is used to describe the net position of governmental funds calculated in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). Budget professionals commonly use this same term to describe the net position of governmental funds calculated on a government's budgetary basis.' While in both cases fund balance is intended to serve as a measure of the financial resources available in a governmental fund; it is essential that differences between GAAP fund balance and budgetary fund balance be fully appreciated. GAAP financial statements report up to five separate categories of fund balance based on the type and source of constraints placed on how resources can be spent (presented in descending order from most constraining to least constraining): nonspendable fund balance, restricted fund balance, committed fund balance, assigned fund balance, and unassigned fund balance.' The total of the amounts in these last three categories (where the only constraint on spending, if any, is imposed by the government itself) is termed unrestricted fund balance. In contrast, budgetary fund balance, while it is subject to the same constraints on spending as GAAP fund balance, typically represents simply the total amount accumulated from prior years at a point in time. The calculation of GAAP fund balance and budgetary fund balance sometimes is complicated by the use of sub -funds within the general fund. In such cases, GAAP fund balance includes amounts from all of the subfunds, whereas budgetary fund balance typically does not. Often the timing of the recognition of revenues and expenditures is different for purposes of GAAP financial reporting and budgeting. For example, encumbrances arising from purchase orders often are recognized as expenditures for budgetary purposes, but never for the preparation of GAAP financial statements. The effect of these and other differences on the amounts reported as GAAP fund balance and budgetary fund balance in the general fund should be clarified, understood, and documented. It is essential that governments maintain adequate levels of fund balance to mitigate current and future risks (e.g., revenue shortfalls and unanticipated expenditures) and to ensure stable tax rates. In most cases, discussions of fund balance will properly focus on a government's general fund. Nonetheless, financial resources available in other funds should also be considered in assessing the adequacy of unrestricted fund balance in the general fund. Recommendation: GFOA recommends that governments establish a formal policy on the level of unrestricted fund balance that should be maintained in the general fund for GAAP and budgetary purposes.' Such a guideline should be set by the appropriate policy body and articulate a framework and process for how the government would increase or decrease the level of unrestricted fund balance over a specific time Packet Pg. 260 8.2.d period.' In particular, governments should provide broad guidance in the policy for how resources will be directed to replenish fund balance should the balance fall below the level prescribed. Appropriate Level. The adequacy of unrestricted fund balance in the general fund should take into account each government's own unique circumstances. For example, governments that may be vulnerable to natural disasters, more dependent on a volatile revenue source, or potentially subject to cuts in state aid and/or federal grants may need to maintain a higher level in the unrestricted fund balance. Articulating these risks in a fund balance policy makes it easier to explain to stakeholders the rationale for a seemingly higher than normal level of fund balance that protects taxpayers and employees from unexpected changes in financial condition. Nevertheless, GFOA recommends, at a minimum, that general-purpose governments, regardless of size, maintain unrestricted budgetary fund balance in their general fund of no less than two months of regular general fund operating revenues or regular general fund operating expenditures.' The choice of revenues or expenditures as a basis of comparison may be dictated by what is more predictable in a government's particular circumstances.' Furthermore, a government's particular situation often may require a level of unrestricted fund balance in the general fund significantly in excess of this recommended minimum level. In any case, such measures should be applied within the context of long-term forecasting, thereby avoiding the risk of placing too much emphasis upon the level of unrestricted fund balance in the general fund at any one time. In establishing a policy governing the level of unrestricted fund balance in the general fund, a government should consider a variety of factors, including: 1. The predictability of its revenues and the volatility of its expenditures (i.e., higher levels of unrestricted fund balance may be needed if significant revenue sources are subject to unpredictable fluctuations or if operating expenditures are highly volatile); 2. Its perceived exposure to significant one-time outlays (e.g., disasters, immediate capital needs, state budget cuts); 3. The potential drain upon general fund resources from other funds, as well as, the availability of resources in other funds; 4. The potential impact on the entity's bond ratings and the corresponding increased cost of borrowed funds; 5. Commitments and assignments (i.e., governments may wish to maintain higher levels of unrestricted fund balance to compensate for any portion of unrestricted fund balance already committed or assigned by the government for a specific purpose). Governments may deem it appropriate to exclude from consideration resources that have been committed or assigned to some other purpose and focus on unassigned fund balance, rather than on unrestricted fund balance. Use and Replenishment. The fund balance policy should define conditions warranting its use, and if a fund balance falls below the government's policy level, a solid plan to replenish it. In that context, the fund balance policy should: 1. Define the time period within which and contingencies for which fund balances will be used; 2. Describe how the government's expenditure and/or revenue levels will be adjusted to match any new economic realities that are behind the use of fund balance as a financing bridge; 3. Describe the time period over which the components of fund balance will be replenished and the means by which they will be replenished. Generally, governments should seek to replenish their fund balances within one to three years of use. Specifically, factors influencing the replenishment time horizon include: 1. The budgetary reasons behind the fund balance targets; 2. Recovering from an extreme event; 3. Political continuity; 4. Financial planning time horizons; Packet Pg. 261 8.2.d 5. Long-term forecasts and economic conditions; 6. External financing expectations. Revenue sources that would typically be looked to for replenishment of a fund balance include nonrecurring revenues, budget surpluses, and excess resources in other funds (if legally permissible and there is a defensible rationale). Year-end surpluses are an appropriate source for replenishing fund balance. Unrestricted Fund Balance Above Formal Policy Requirement. In some cases, governments can find themselves in a position with an amount of unrestricted fund balance in the general fund over their formal policy reserve requirement even after taking into account potential financial risks in the foreseeable future. Amounts over the formal policy may reflect a structural trend, in which case governments should consider a policy as to how this would be addressed. Additionally, an education or communication strategy, or at a minimum, explanation of large changes in fund balance is encouraged. In all cases, use of those funds should be prohibited as a funding source for ongoing recurring expenditures. Committee: Accounting, Auditing, and Financial Reporting Governmental Budgeting and Fiscal Policy Notes: 1. For the sake of clarity, this recommended practice uses the terms GAAP fund balance and budgetary fund balance to distinguish these two different uses of the same term. 2. These categories are set forth in Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Statement No. 54, Fund Balance Reporting and Governmental Fund Type Definitions. 3. Sometimes restricted fund balance includes resources available to finance items that typically would require the use of unrestricted fund balance (e.g., a contingency reserve). In that case, such amounts should be included as part of unrestricted fund balance for purposes of analysis. 4. See Recommended Practice 4.1 of the National Advisory Council on State and Local Budgeting governments on the need to "maintain a prudent level of financial resources to protect against reducing service levels or raising taxes and fees because of temporary revenue shortfalls or unpredicted one-time expenditures" (Recommended Practice 4.1). 5. In practice, a level of unrestricted fund balance significantly lower than the recommended minimum may be appropriate for states and America's largest governments (e.g., cities, counties, and school districts) because they often are in a better position to predict contingencies (for the same reason that an insurance company can more readily predict the number of accidents for a pool of 500,000 drivers than for a pool of fifty), and because their revenues and expenditures often are more diversified and thus potentially less subject to volatility. 6. In either case, unusual items that would distort trends (e.g., one-time revenues and expenditures) should be excluded, whereas recurring transfers should be included. Once the decision has been made to compare unrestricted fund balance to either revenues and/or expenditures, that decision should be followed consistently from period to period. Packet Pg. 262 8.2.e W. WASHINGTON MID -SIZED FINANCIAL POLICY SUMMARY RISK FUND RESERVE TARGET BALANCE CONTINGENCY CITY POLICY RANGE POLICY TARGET RANGE RESERVE POLICY TARGET RANGE AUBURN N N/A Y 8-12% NOTE #2 NOTE #2 N/A BOTHELL N N/A Y 15% of operating expenditures N/A N/A BREMERTON Y NOTE #1 minimum of 8.5% of operating Y NOTE #3 expenditures (NOTE #6) DES MOINES N N/A y NOTE #4 NOTE #5 NOTE #5 KENT N N/A Y cap of 18% of general fund y 10% of total city revenues fiscal year budget KIRKLAND N N/A N If uncommitted ending fund Y 80%of statutory balance dollars are available, cap of $0.375 per policy calls for distributing 50% $1000 of assessed of fund balance to the various valuaton reserve funds ISSAQUAH N N/A Y cap of 20% of general fund Y no cap defined in expenditures policy LYNNWOOD N N/A Y NOTE#7 N N/A MARYSVILLE N N/A Y 10% of general fund revenue N NOTE #8 MILL CREEK N N/A Y at least 15% of total general N NOTE #10 fund budgeted revenue (NOTE #9) MUKILTEO N N/A Y NOTE#11 Y Minimum of $1m PUYALLUP N N/A Y 8 - 15% of operating revenues N NOTE #12 REDMOND N N/A Y 12.% of operating revenues N NOTE #13 RENTON N N/A Y 12%of general fund operating N N/A expenditures SHORELINE N N/A Y 10% of economical ly-sensitive Y "Budget revenues (NOTE #14) Contingency" reserve of $805k NOTE 1: Bremerton is self -insured, and risk management pool varies each year based on claims activity. There is no specific funding target range. NOTE 2: Auburn also maintains a "cumulative reserve fund" with a range of 5-10% of general governmental operating expenditures. Other proprietary funds target balances of 10-20%of budgeted operating, maintenance and capital expenditures NOTE 3: Target is $0.375/$1000 of assessed valuation of property within the city. NOTE 4: Target is mimimum of 16.67%of recurring operating expenditures NOTE5: Has "stabilization reserve", which is 5%of general fund revenues NOTE 6: 2018 actual ending fund balance was 14.2%of operating expenditures NOTE 7: 19.5% of general fund operating expenses are allocated to two reserve funds: revenue stabilization fund and unencumbered (unassiged) fund balance. NOTE 8: endingfund balance may be held as reserve of reappropriated to a capital reserve, long term obligaton or debt service fund. NOTE 9: excluding beginning fund balance NOTE 10: General fund surpluses will be used to fund onttime operations,capital expenditures or dedicated to the CIP NOTE 11: General fund operating reserve is established as a "cash flow reserve," equal to two months (or 16.6%) of budgeted operating expenditures NOTE 12: Inclusion of all reserves brings total to 18.7%of general fund revneues NOTE 13: General fund reserve is also used to cover contingencies such as natural disasters NOTE 14: Economically sensitive revenues are "volatile" revenues such as taxes from sales tax, gambling tax, state -shared revenues, recreation fees, etc. Shoreline also maintains a $3m General Fund Operating Reserve for cash flow purposes Packet Pg. 263 8.2.f City of Edmonds r I$90 DRAFT Fund Balance Reserve Policy May 2019 Q Packet Pg. 264 8.2.f Table of Contents DRAFT.........................................................................................................................................1 ARTICLE I INTRODUCTION.........................................................................................................3 ARTICLE II CRITERIA FOR ESTABLISHING APPROPRIATE FUND BALANCE RESERVE LEVELS........................................................................................................................................4 Section1. Volatility.....................................................................................................................4 Section2. Operating Fund Size.....................................................................................................4 Section 3. Purpose of Fund Balance Reserves.................................................................................4 Section4. Bond Ratings...............................................................................................................4 ARTICLE III COMMITTED GENERAL FUND BALANCE RESERVES POLICY .............................4 Section 1. Establishment and Purpose of Operating General Fund Operating Reserve .........................4 ARTICLE IV CONTINGENT RESERVE FUND BALANCE POLICY...............................................5 ARTICLE V ANNUAL FUND BALANCE TYPES - STATUS REPORT............................................6 ARTICLE VI FIVE-YEAR RESERVE RATE REVIEW....................................................................6 ARTICLE VII DEVIATIONS FROM POLICY.................................................................................7 ARTICLE VIII DEFINITIONS........................................................................................................7 ARTICLE IX EFFECTIVE DATE....................................................................................................9 Page 2 Packet Pg. 265 8.2.f ARTICLE I INTRODUCTION The overall objective of Fund Balance/Reserve Management Policy is to define that portion of fund balance that is unavailable to support the current budget. In many ways, fund balance represents working capital, which can either be used as a liquidity reserve or for spending in future years. A comprehensive fund balance/reserve management policy provides guidelines for the major funds of the City of Edmonds and provides a structured approach in setting reserve levels in specifically designated funds. This Fund Balance/Reserve Management Policy is intended to guide prudent use of resources to provide for the much needed services to taxpayers and to maintain sound management policies. It is essential that governments maintain adequate levels of fund balance reserves to mitigate risks and provide a back-up for revenue shortfalls. Policy It is the policy of the City of Edmonds to provide for the continuity of City government by planning ahead for economic uncertainties and unforeseen or unplanned major expenditures. In order to achieve reserve goals the City must exercise prudent debt and liability management policies and follow sound fiscal management policies that prioritize the City's core services. This policy establishes reserve fund balance accounts that will provide funding for emergencies, economic uncertainties and for unanticipated operating expenses or revenue shortfalls. In addition, this policy incorporates provisions of Governmental Accounting Standards Board Statement (GASB) no. 54, Fund Balance Reporting and Governmental Fund Type Definitions. Objectives The purpose of this Fund Balance/Reserve Management Policy is to assist the City in the pursuit of the following equally important objectives: 1. Build adequate reserves which will provide the City the resources necessary for financial stabilization, particularly during times of unforeseen emergencies and economic downturns; 2. Establish sound fiscal reserve policies that will serve as the foundation for ensuring that strong fiscal management policies guide future City decisions; 3. Provide prudent guidelines regarding the establishment, use and replenishment of City committed or assigned fund balances/reserves; 4. Establish a process for periodic reporting and review of the City's various fund balances (reserves); and 5. Enhance the City's credit ratings received from rating institutions through the establishment of clearly delineated Fund/Reserve policies that promote strong fiscal management; 6. Establish reserve policies that are in full compliance with GASB 54 financial reporting requirements. Page 3 Packet Pg. 266 8.2.f ARTICLE II CRITERIA FOR ESTABLISHING APPROPRIATE FUND BALANCE RESERVE LEVELS There are key elements that must be reviewed and analyzed to determine the appropriate size of a given fund balance reserve. Failure to follow the guidelines established in this policy can result in developing unattainable fund reserve goals or unsustainable fund balance reserve levels. The following criteria shall be used in determining the appropriate fund balance reserve levels: Section 1. Volatility The predictability and/or the volatility of its revenues or its expenditures (i.e., higher levels of fund balance reserves may be needed if significant revenue sources are subject to unpredictable fluctuations or if operating expenditures are highly volatile). Section 2.Operating Fund Size The overall size of the fund's budgetary events should be taken into consideration in setting the required fund balance reserve level and type for a particular fund. Section 3. Purpose of Fund Balance Reserves Another consideration for determining the size of each reserve will be the purpose of the reserve: Is there significant or perceived exposure to one-time outlays (e.g., disasters, immediate capital needs, state budget cuts, or are there potential drains upon fund resources from other funds, or conversely, are there potential reductions in funding transfers from other funds)? Section 4. Bond Ratings The potential impact on the entity's bond ratings and the corresponding increased cost of borrowed funds. ARTICLE III COMMITTED GENERAL FUND BALANCE RESERVES POLICY This Policy shall establish a committed fund balance reserve within the General Fund, define funding levels and call the reserve the General Fund Operating Reserve. The purpose of the reserve is for meeting economic uncertainties, and for unanticipated expenses or revenue shortfalls. This Policy requires the City to establish and maintain a General Fund Operating Reserve in an amount equal to or greater than 16% of the General Fund's Adopted Annual Operating Expenditure Budget. If it is determined that the reserve balances are not adequate, the Finance Director shall propose an amendment to these policies. A detailed accounting of this reserve account will be maintained by the Finance Department to show deposits, withdrawals (when authorized pursuant to policies contained herein) and interest earned. All accounting for these accounts shall be recorded in the City's ERP system. A detailed report, prepared by the Finance Department, shall be presented annually to the Council. Section 1. Establishment and Purpose of Operating General Fund Operating Reserve A separate balance sheet account shall be setup by the Finance Director for the General Fund Operating Reserve, to be used in instances of fiscal emergencies that include: economic uncertainties, unforeseen emergencies and unanticipated operating expenses or revenue shortfalls. Page 4 Packet Pg. 267 The Mayor has the power to declare a fiscal emergency based upon one of the following: 1) A natural catastrophe; 2) An immediate threat to health and public safety; or 3) A significant decline in General Fund revenues. The fiscal emergency declared by the Mayor must be approved by a simple majority of the City Council. Limitations of Fund Use Any use of the committed General Fund Operating Reserves shall be used only in cases of fiscal emergency and shall not be used to augment ongoing budgetary/operating spending increases. The committed General Fund Operating Reserve may also be used for one-time non -reoccurring expenditures and/or capital projects (operations and maintenance shall not be included), all as submitted by the Mayor and approved by the Council. The amount of funds to be withdrawn from this committed fund balance reserve shall be determined by the Mayor. In his/her presentation to the Council, the Mayor or his/her designee shall include a detailed list of how the funds will be applied. A simple majority vote of the Council shall be required to approve the amount and use of funds. Transition Policy Council adoption of this policy will trigger moving an amount not less than 16% of the General Fund's Adopted Annual Operating Expenditure Budget from unrestricted fund balance to the General Fund Operating Reserve. Committed Fund Balance Reserve Replenishment The Committed General Fund Reserve shall be restored pursuant to the guidelines delineated below: 1) If a reserve is drawn down by 0-10% of reserve fund balance, then a solution to replenish to at least the minimum shall be structured over a 1 to 3 year period. 2) If a reserve is drawn down by 11-25% of reserve fund balance, then the budgetary plan to restore the reserve shall be structured over a 3 to 5 year period. 3) If the reserve is drawn down by 26-50% of reserve fund balance, then a budgetary plan shall be implemented to return the reserve level to between 75% and 100% of the minimum balance over a 5 to 7 year period. ARTICLE IV CONTINGENT RESERVE FUND BALANCE POLICY This Policy shall establish a fund and define funding levels for a committed Fund Balance Reserve to be called the Contingent Reserve Fund. The primary purpose of the reserve is for meeting emergencies of the City and, secondarily, if the General Fund Operating Reserve have been exhausted, the Contingent Reserve Fund can be use in times of economic uncertainties, and for unanticipated expenses or revenue shortfalls. The target balance of the Reserve shall 1) not exceed the limitations set forth by RCW 35A.33.145, which sets the statutory maximum at $0.375 per $1,000 of assessed valuation and 2) when combined with the General Fund Operating Reserve, the two fund balance reserves shall not exceed 20% of the General Fund's Adopted Annual Operating Expenditure Budget. In other words, if the General Fund Operating Reserve balance equals 16% of operating budget, then the Contingent Reserve Fund balance cannot exceed 4% of the operating budget. It Page 5 Packet Pg. 268 8.2.f further requires a simple majority vote of Council with a statement declaring the reason for their use. A detailed accounting of the Fund shall be maintained by the Finance Department to show deposits, withdrawals (when authorized pursuant to policies contained herein) and be presented annually to the Council. The Mayor has the power to declare a fiscal emergency based upon one of the following: 1) A natural catastrophe; 2) An immediate threat to health and public safety; or 3) A significant economic decline in General Fund revenues. The fiscal emergency declared by the Mayor must be approved by a simple majority of the City Council. Limitations of Fund Use Any use of the committed Contingent Reserves shall be used in cases of fiscal emergency, shall not be used to augment ongoing budgetary/operating spending increases and should be used only after the General Fund Operating Reserves have been exhausted or when City Council approves specific used of the committed Contingent Reserve for one-time non -reoccurring expenditures and/or capital projects (operations and maintenance shall not be included). The amount of funds to be withdrawn from this committed fund balance reserve shall be determined by the Mayor. In his/her presentation to the Council, the Mayor or his/her designee shall include a detailed list of how the funds will be applied. A simple majority vote of the Council shall be required to approve the amount and use of funds. Replenishment of the Reserve 1) If a reserve is drawn down by 0-10% of reserve fund balance, then a solution to replenish to at least the minimum shall be structured over a 1 to 3 year period. 2) If a reserve is drawn down by 11-25% of reserve fund balance, then the budgetary plan to restore the reserve shall be structured over a 3 to 5 year period. 3) If the reserve is drawn down by 26-50% of reserve fund balance, then a budgetary plan shall be implemented to return the reserve level to between 75% and 100% of the minimum balance over a 5 to 7 year period. ARTICLE V ANNUAL FUND BALANCE TYPES - STATUS REPORT Once a year, in August, the City Finance Director shall present to the Council Finance Committee a comprehensive report on the City's fund balance reserve types as of June 30th. The report shall include an updated fund balance reserve level for each fund balance type. This report shall include the following funds: 1. General Fund Operating Reserve balance; 2. Contingency Reserve Fund balance. ARTICLE VI FIVE-YEAR RESERVE RATE REVIEW Page 6 Packet Pg. 269 8.2.f Every five years, during the annual budget hearings, the Mayor, based upon a comprehensive financial and economic review of all City fund balance types and in consultation with the City Finance Director, and Department Directors as necessary, shall make recommendations to the City Council for either maintaining existing fund balance reserve polices or revising fund balance reserve policies including percentage ranges established by category herein and replenishment requirements by categories established herein. ARTICLE VII DEVIATIONS FROM POLICY No deviations from the fund balance reserve polices set forth in this Policy will be allowed except as approved by a simple majority of vote by the Council. This includes any increase or decrease in the base fund balance reserve levels established by this policy and expenditures from fund balance reserve accounts for anything other than the intended budgeted use of said fund balance. ARTICLE VIII DEFINITIONS Budget - A plan of financial operation containing an estimate of proposed expenditures for a given period (usually a fiscal year) and a proposed forecast of revenues (receipts) to cover them. A budget is also a plan that outlines an organization's financial and operational goals and strategies in monetary terms. Capital Expenditures are expenditures incurred when monies are spent either to buy fixed assets or to add to the value of an existing fixed asset with a useful life that extends beyond the fiscal year. In accounting, a capital expenditure is added to an asset account ("capitalized"), thus increasing the asset's basis (the cost or value of an asset). The general rule (even for municipalities) is that if the property acquired has a useful life longer than the fiscal year, the cost must be capitalized. The capital expenditure costs are then amortized or depreciated over the life of the asset in question. Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) - A CAFR is a set of financial statements for a state, municipality or other governmental entity that comply with the accounting requirements established by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB). It must be audited by an independent auditor using generally accepted government auditing standards. The CAFR consists of three sections: Introductory, Financial and Statistical. The Introductory section orients and guides the reader through the report. The Financial section presents the entity's basic financial statements as well as notes to the statements and the independent auditors' report. The Statistical section provides additional financial and statistical data, including data about financial trends that may better inform the reader about the government's activities. Council - Means the legislative body (the city council) that governs the City of Edmonds. Expenditure - The actual payment of cash or cash equivalent for goods delivered or services rendered, or a charge against available funds in settlement of an obligation as evidenced by an invoice, voucher or other such document during the fiscal year. For governmental reporting purposes, expenditures include expenses or a provision for debt retirement not reported as a liability of the fund from which retired. Page 7 Packet Pg. 270 8.2.f Fiscal Year - A 12 month period to which the annual operating budget applies and the end of which a governmental unit determines its financial position and the results of its operations. The City has specified January 1 through December 31 as its fiscal year. Fund - A fund is a self -balancing set of accounts recording cash and other financial resources, together with all related liabilities and "residual" equity or balances, and changes therein, which are segregated for the purpose of carrying on specific activities or attaining certain planned objectives in accordance with special regulations, restrictions or limitations. Fund Balances - The overall objective of fund balance reporting is to isolate that portion of a fund balance that is unavailable to support the following period's budget (see GASB 54 definition below). In general, an unassigned fund balance shall be defined as those amounts that are not restricted, committed, or assigned, of a particular fund at the end of the fiscal year. GASB 54 - Fund Balance Reporting and Governmental Fund Type Definitions - The City of Edmonds's CAFR Financial Statements are required to comply with GASB 54 beginning with its Fiscal Year End 2011 CAFR going forward. GASB 54 changes and identifies fund balance classifications that can be more consistently applied by clarifying existing governmental fund type definitions. Fund balance is basically the difference between the assets and liabilities reported in a fund. GASB statement No. 54 provides the following five categories for classifying fund balance and related definitions to be used for describing the components of fund balance: 1. Nonsuendable Fund Balance Amounts that are not in a spendable form or are required to be maintained intact. Due to the nature or form of the resources, they generally cannot be expected to be converted into cash or a spendable form (e.g. Inventories and prepaid amounts). This also includes long-term loan and notes receivable and property held for resale. Applies as well to amounts that must be retained intact legally or contractually. 2. Restricted Fund Balance — Amounts that can be spent only for the specific purposes stipulated. Constraints are placed on the use of resources by external parties (e.g. by creditors, grant providers, contributors) or by laws or regulations (e.g. constitution or legally enforceable language). Restrictions may be changed or lifted only with the consent of the resource provider. 3. Committed Fund Balance — Amounts can only be used for the specific purposes determined by a formal action of City Council. Constraints on fund balance use are imposed by internal formal action of the government's highest level of decision -making authority (e.g. City Council) and can only be removed or changed by taking the same type of action it employed to commit those amounts through legislation, resolution, or ordinance (e.g. funds committed to satisfy contractual obligations). Action to constrain resources must occur prior to year-end; however the amount can be determined in the subsequent period. 4. Assigned Fund Balance — Assigned fund balances include amounts that are limited by the Council, Mayor, or his/her designee, for its intended use, but little or no formal action is required to modify or eliminate those limitations. Assigned fund balances comprises amounts intended to be used for a specific purpose. Amounts reported as assigned should not result in a deficit in unassigned fund balance. Also relates to all governmental funds other than the General Fund, with any remaining positive amounts not classified as nonspendable, restricted or committed. Page 8 Packet Pg. 271 8.2.f 5. Unassigned Fund Balance — Comprises the residual classification for the General Fund and includes all amounts not contained in the other classifications. Unassigned amounts are available for any purpose. This represents the residual amount of the fund balance that has not been restricted, committed, or assigned. General Fund - In public sector accounting, the General Fund is the primary operating fund for all revenues of the City that are not otherwise restricted as to their use, including monies from local property and sales tax, and other revenue sources that are not assigned for a specific purpose. The General Fund provides the resources necessary to pay/sustain the day-to-day activities for City services such as administration, community services, parks and recreation, police, fire, public works, elected officials, Mayor, and City Council. When governments or administrators talk about "balancing the budget" they typically mean balancing the budget for their general fund. Government Accounting Standards Board (GASB) - GASB is the private, nonpartisan, nonprofit organization that works to create and improve the rules U.S. state and local governments follow when accounting for their finances and reporting them to the public. While the GASB does not have the power to enforce compliance with the standards it promulgates, the authority for its standards is recognized under the Rules of Conduct of the AICPA. Also, legislation in many states requires compliance with GASB standards, and governments usually are expected to prepare financial statements in accordance with those standards when they issue bonds or notes or otherwise borrow from public credit markets. The GASB was established in 1984 and is funded by publication sales, contributions from state and local governments, and voluntary assessment fees from municipal bond issues. Operating Budget — A detailed projection of all estimated income and expenses based on forecasted revenue during a given period (usually one year). Since an operating budget is a short-term budget, capital outlays are excluded because they are long-term costs. One-time revenues, such as grants, settlements, sales of assets and transfers are excluded because often they are non -recurring sources of revenues and cannot be counted on coming in from one budget cycle to the next. Revenue - The income of a government from all sources appropriated for the payment of the public expenses. It includes such items as tax payments, fees from specific services, receipts from other governments, fines, forfeitures, grants, shared revenues and interest income. Structural Budget Deficit or "Gap" - A budget deficit (Gap) that results from a fundamental imbalance whereby current year governmental expenditures exceed current year revenues without any consideration of carryover or prior year unspent revenue balances if they exist. A structural deficit remains across the operating fiscal cycle because the general level of government spending is too high for the prevailing revenue structure (e.g., taxes, fees and other sources). A fiscal Gap, is a structural budget deficit over an extended period of time and not only includes the structural deficit at a given point in time but also the difference between promised future government commitments, such as health and retirement spending, and future planned or anticipated tax and other revenues. Another description is that the current revenue structure is insufficient to maintain services at the current level. ARTICLE IX EFFECTIVE DATE Page 9 Packet Pg. 272 8.2.f This policy shall take effect upon its final adoption by the City Council. Page 10 a Packet Pg. 273 MRSC - Which Financial Policies Work Best? 'It Depends.' Page I of 4 8.2.g �MRSC Local Government Success Which Financial Policies Work Best? 'It Depends.' April 26, 2017 by Mike Bailey Category: Finance Advisor, Finance Policies I was preparing a presentation on financial management recently and was reminded of a concept that has been reinforced to me many times over the years. For purposes of this blog post, I'll call it the 'It Depends' concept. I first gave some thought to this idea some time ago when I was involved in a discussion on what the right level of fund balance should be for local governments. This discussion occurred in the Committee on Budgeting and Financial Management for the Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA). The most common question GFOA regularly got from its 19,000 members was "what is the right level of fund balance for local government?" and the answer, in its entirety, was "it depends." That was all — an "it depends" followed by a "thank you for asking!" Fortunately, we soon realized that while "it depends" was the right answer, it was also totally unsatisfying. Real GFOA members, who worked with real councils / boards seeking to adopt meaningful financial policies, wanted more. So the budget committee went on to provide some additional guidance around the "it depends" answer. The current GFOA best practice has since evolved into different aspects on the fund balance question. There are published best practice documents on Fund Balance in the General Fund and Working Capital in Enterprise Funds. Essentially, the general guidance is to maintain at least two months of fund balance or working capital — but, of course, it depends. Different Strokes for Different Folks So, why do I think that "it depends" is the right answer? As pointed out in the GFOA's best practice documents on the topic, each government's context will be different. Our economies are different, our sources of revenues are different, our habits and practices are different. These differences are what makes local government an interesting and challenging place to work. Packet Pg. 274 http://mrsc.org/Home/Stay-Informed/MRSC-Insight/May/Best-Financial-Policy-It-Depend... 5/18/2017 MRSC - Which Financial Policies Work Best? 'It Depends.' Page 2 of 4 8.2.g No one set of answers will always (or ever) apply to the challenges and opportunities that we are confronted with. But these differences also need to be taken into account when we determine the best policies for our specific jurisdiction. Have a Conversation I also like this answer because it gets at the heart of what makes for the best policy guidance: Before a meaningful policy can be developed, a good conversation needs to occur. This conversation should be informed by such things as the best practice guidance mentioned above, your own past experiences, a review of the issues and influences that may come into play, and other elements. A discussion of this nature allows participants to interact with data, advice, experience, their own ideas, and the ideas of others. Thoughtful discussion allows best policy guidance to emerge, to be documented, and then, to be adopted by the legislative body. This is a great way to start a budget process. Take a look at the policies you've adopted (or maybe should still adopt) and consider if these continue to provide the best 'guardrails' to guide your local government into the future. Have the conversation! Beyond Fund Balance The "it depends" concept extends beyond fund balance. There are many, many areas where it is important to provide policy guidance for an organization to work effectively together and make progress over time. There is a tension inherent in these discussions that should be recognized as part of the discussion. Too much policy control will limit the flexibility of the staff to function as efficiently as possible. Too little control may enable administrative action that is outside the bounds of what the legislative (policy) body would prefer. Finding that happy medium between efficiency and preferred behavior will only occur through a thoughtful discussion. Potential Discussions Examples of potential discussions resulting in good policy guidance include: Purchasing limits —At what points do procurement of goods and services require council / board approval? Fees and charges —Who has what authority for setting fees in your organization? What are the goals in fee setting: cost recovery, equity, accessibility? Grants —Who can apply for grants? Are there any priorities for which grants to pursue? Where is responsibility for grant compliance? Investments —Who is authorized to invest public funds? What are the goals of the program? What investments are permissible? Balanced budgets —Is cash forward, or fund balance, available as a revenue to balance budgets? Capital expenditures —What is the capitalization threshold? What qualifies for a capital project in the budget: cost and life of the resulting asset? In each of these examples it can be very helpful to know the right answer before confronted with the challenge. The 'right' answer will be different from one local government to another. Therefore some discussion will be necessary to arrive at the best answer for your entity. Packet Pg. 275 http://mrsc.org/Home/Stay-Informed/MRSC-Insight/May/Best-Financial-Policy-It-Depend... 5/18/2017 MRSC - Which Financial Policies Work Best? 'It Depends.' Page 3 of 4 8.2.g Fortunately, in the public sector we can benefit from each other's experiences. The MRSC website has many good examples of financial policies adopted by various local governments (and is a great place to start). However, at the end of the day, the best financial policies for your jurisdiction can only be determined after a good conversation. That is because the answer to any of these questions is - "It depends." Not sure what the right financial policies are for your jurisdiction? MRSC has just launched a new series of online resources to help you develop policies and procedures that are tailored to your jurisdiction's needs. We've focused on five key areas in particular: • Asset management • Cost allocation • Debt • Fund balance/reserves • Investments For each area, we provide key questions to consider as well as links to best practices and examples from local jurisdictions in Washington. We can't give you the right answer — like Mike says, "it depends" — but we can help you ask the right questions to get there! About Mike Bailey Mike Bailey writes for MRSC as a Finance Advisor. Mike Bailey is currently the Finance Director for the city of Redmond. Previously he worked as Administrator of Finance and Information Services for the city of Renton and as the Director of Finance for the city of Lynnwood. Mr. Bailey also served as president of the Washington Finance Officers Association and is the Vice Chair of the GFOA Budget Committee. An experienced CPA and GFOA budget reviewer, Mr. Bailey co-founded the annual Budget and Fiscal Management Workshops held each summer. Mr. Bailey conducts numerous workshops and has authored various articles on local government finance, including Effective Budgeting in Washington State Cities published by the Association of Washington Cities. The views expressed in Advisor columns represent the opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those ofMRSC. VIEW ALL POSTS BY MIKE BAILEY / Leave a Comment - Comments Packet Pg. 276 http://mrsc.org/Home/Stay-Informed/MRSC-Insight/May/Best-Financial-Policy-It-Depend... 5/18/2017 MRSC - Which Financial Policies Work Best? 'It Depends.' Page 4 of 4 8.2.g 0 comments on Which Financial Policies Work Best? 'It Depends.' Blog post currently doesn't have any comments. © 2015 MRSC of Washington. All rights reserved. Privacy & Terms. Packet Pg. 277 http://mrsc.org/Home/Stay-Informed/MRSC-Insight/May/Best-Financial-Policy-It-Depend... 5/18/2017 8.2.h Fund Balance / Reserve Policy .FPC. t g9" ➢During the last recession, the City lost over $13.3 In revenues ➢We laid -off 21 employees ➢Impacts to citizens included the elimination of: 1) The Block Watch Program million m 2) The Police Department's Vacation House Check Program 3) We eliminated the Crime Prevention Unit 4) We had less Police Officers to keep our City safe 5) City Hall Closed one day a week 6) We also stopped our Street Preservation Program 7) Staff had to do more with less resources ➢Tonight we are going to discuss a plan that has a goal to limit future impacts to citizens and staff Packet Pg. 278 8.2.h Fund Balance / Reserve Policy . /1C IS9V ➢ Quick overview of current policy ➢ Overview of factors considered for draft Fund Balance / Reserve Policy ➢ Introduce draft amendments to the City's Fund Balance / Reserve Policy ➢ Council Feedback & Q & A after presentation Packet Pg. 279 Fund Balance / Reserve ./1C IS9V ➢ Policy Calls For a total of 18% 8.2.h Policy� Current Policy y m 1) Contingency Reserve Fund — Target 8 — 16% o 2) Risk Management — Target 2% d IL a) ➢ Use of Contingency reserves limited to solving imbalances in the General FundCO ➢ Use of Risk Management reserves limited to = mitigation of legal matters or natural disasters T -- I Packet Pg. 280 `4e. ]S9V 82.h Fund Balance / Reserve Policy Factors to Consider When Setting Your Fund Balance Level z GASB 54 ➢The first factor incorporates the requirements of the m Governmental Accounting Standards Board or GASBymm. ➢For those unfamiliar with GASB, GASB is the body that establishes Generally Accepted Accounting Principles or (GAAP), the accounting rules we have to follow ➢GASB issued Statement 54 requiring Fund Balance Classifications ➢We implemented this rule in 2014 and now updating the policy to include GASB Statement 54 requirement 14 Packet Pg. 281 ➢ RCW 35A.33.145 Fund Creation. 8.2.h Fund Balance / Reserve Policy Factors to Consider When Setting Your Fund Balance Level RCW 35A.33.145 establishes authority for Contingency ➢ This RCW allows us to create a Contingency Reserve Fund to: ➢ Meet any municipal expense which could not have been foreseen or for emergencies ➢ The RCW limits the size of the reserve to thirty-seven and one-half cents per thousand dollars of assessed property valuation or $3,830,000 Packet Pg. 282 ./1C I s9v 8.2.h Fund Balance / Reserve Policy Factors to Consider When Setting Your Fund Balance Level GFOA Best Practice Guideline ➢ GFOA recommends a fund balance reserve of no less m then two months of regular general fund operating revenue or operating expenditures ➢ The choice of revenues or expenditures as a basis of comparison may be dictated by what is more predictable Packet Pg. 283 `'? C . iQ 9M 0 82.h Fund Balance / Reserve Policy Factors to Consider When Setting Your Fund Balance Level 0� GFOA Best Practice Guideline 0' (continued) 1. The predictability / volatility of revenues and 3 expenses 0 ➢ GFOA states higher levels may be needed if revenues or expenses are unpredictable or volatile 2. Perceived exposure to significant one-time outlays, e.g., disasters, state budget cuts, or immediate capital needs 3. The potential drain upon the general fund from other funds 4. The potential impact on the entity's bond rating __ 7 Packet Pg. 284 ./1C l s9v 8.2.h Fund Balance / Reserve Policy Factors to Consider When Setting Your Fund Balance Level GFOA Best Practice Guideline ➢ Past experiences (continued) C — During last recession 9 LL 1. Lost Revenues - EMS Levy, Sales Tax & Development Related Revenues 2. Impacts to City Services as 21 positions were laid off during the last recession & staff furloughs I Stopped Street preservation Packet Pg. 285 8.2.h Fund Balance / Reserve Policy Factors to Consider When Setting Your Fund Balance Level ,,,� l �y� CFOA Best Practice Guideline (continued) m ➢ Past experiences — Lost revenues during last recession $4,250,000 $4,000,000 $ 3, 75 0,000 $3,500,000 $3,250,000 $3,000,000 $2,750,000 $2,500,000 Lost EMS Revenue Totals $4,494,460 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2009 Voted Levy Amount Actual Levy Packet Pg. 286 ./1C I s9m 8.2.h Fund Balance / Reserve Policy Factors to Consider When Setting Your Fund Balance Level GFOA Best Practice Guideline (continued) m ➢ Past experiences — Lost revenues during last recession $6,000,000 $ 5, 75 0,000 $5,500,000 $ 5, 25 0,000 $5,000,000 $4,750,000 $4,500,000 $4,250,000 $4,000,000 Lost Sales Tax Revenue Totals $4,383,724 z 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2007 Sales Tax Revenuf Actual Revenuf in Packet Pg. 287 8.2.h Fund Balance / Reserve Policy Factors to Consider When Setting Your Fund Balance Level w s i g y GFOA Best Practice Guideline (continued) )'w'- Past experiences — Lost revenues during last recession $2,000,000 T Lost Development Related Revenue Totals $4,052,843 $1, 750,000 $1, 500,000 $1, 25 0,000 $1, 000,000 $750,000 $500,000 Air 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2008 Developmen Revenues Actual Revenue 11 Packet Pg. 288 . /1C I s9v 82.h Fund Balance / Reserve Policy Factors to Consider When Setting Your Fund Balance Level GFOA Best Practice Guideline (continued) Past experiences — Lost revenues during last recession Cumulative Revenues Lost due to Recession $14,000,000 $13,000,000 $12,000,000 $11,000,000 $10,000,000 $9,000,000 $8,000,000 $7,000,000 $6,000,000 $5,000,000 $4,000,000 $3,000,000 $2,000,000 $1,000,000 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 19 Packet Pg. 289 ./1C I s9m 30% 8.2.h Fund Balance / Reserve Policy Factors to Consider When Setting Your Fund Balance Level Neighboring Cities Reserve Policies Approximate Reserve Policies in Neighboring CitiesLU 28% 20% 20% 21% 22% 22% 20% - 19% 17% 15% 15% 12% 12% 12% 10% 10% 8% - 0% Packet Pg. 290 ./,C 130 82.h Fund Balance / Reserve Policy Draft PolicvOverview'. Article I m To provide for the continuity of City government by', 0 planningahead for uncertainties or unforeseen expenditures ➢ Article II Criteria that should be considered 1. Volatility 2. Fund size 3. Purpose of reserve 4. Bond Ratings 14 Packet Pg. 291 `ne. to 82.h Fund Balance / Reserve Policy Draft Policy Overview continued ➢ Article III General Fund Operating Reserve m ➢ Policy would set reserve to equal 16% of General 0 Fund Adopted Operating Expenditure Budget d ➢ Finance to deliver annual report to CouncilEL ➢ Limitations of Fund Use ➢ Mayor can declare a fiscal emergency based upon: 1. Natural catastrophe 2. Threat to health or public safety, or 3. Significant decline in General Fund revenues ➢ Fiscal emergency must be approved by a sim leg Y pp p majority vote of the Council a Packet Pg. 292 ./1C l s9v 82.h Fund Balance / Reserve Policy Draft Policy Overview continued m ➢ Primary differences between the two reserves 1. Contingency Reserve limited by RCW 2. The two reserves cannot surpass 20% of the General ➢ Article IV Contingency Reserve Fund Fund Adopted Operating Expenditure Budget 3. If the General Fund Operating Reserve equals 16%, then the Contingency Reserve cannot exceed 4% 4. General Fund Operating Reserve should be exhausted prior to utilizing the Contingency Reserve ➢ Fiscal emergency must be approved by a simple majority vote of the Council ig Packet Pg. 293 82.h Fund Balance / Reserve Policy Draft Policv Overview continued M ➢ Replenishment of the Reserve Funds 1. 0 — 10%use of funds be replenished over 3 years 2. 11 — 25%use of funds be replenished over 5 years 3. 26 — 50%use of funds be replenished over 7 years 17 Packet Pg. 294 82.h Fund Balance / Reserve Policy `'? C . 1Q 9M 0 )'w- Article V -Reporting Draft Policy Overview continued ➢ During month of August, Council to receive comprehensive fund balance reserve report ➢ Article VI —Five Year Review ➢ Article VII —Any deviations from policy requires Council approval ➢ Article VIII -Definitions m 12 Packet Pg. 295 82.h Fund Balance / Reserve Policy Review / Recommendations ./1C IS9V ➢ Current Policy Calls For a total of 18% 9 ➢ The amended policy calls for a total of 20% ➢ Finance Committee recommends closing the d a Risk Management Fund into the General Fund ➢ Council Feedback & Q & A m LL 1A Packet Pg. 296