Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
2019-06-25 City Council - Full Agenda-2384
1 2 3 4 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. o Agenda Edmonds City Council snl. ,nyo COUNCIL CHAMBERS 250 5TH AVE NORTH, EDMONDS, WA 98020 JUNE 25, 2019, 7:00 PM CALL TO ORDER/FLAG SALUTE ROLL CALL APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA APPROVAL OF THE CONSENT AGENDA 1. Approval of Council Special Meeting Minutes of June 18, 2019 2. Approval of Council Meeting Minutes of June 18, 2019 3. Approval of claim, payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire payments. 4. Edmonds Employee Association, Local 3517 (AFSCME Council 2) 2018-2020 collective bargaining agreement 5. ECC 5.32 and 5.05.060; Park Rules and Dog Rules 6. Settlement Agreement and Release AUDIENCE COMMENTS (3-MINUTE LIMIT PER PERSON) - REGARDING MATTERS NOT LISTED ON THE AGENDA AS CLOSED RECORD REVIEW OR AS PUBLIC HEARINGS REPORTS ON OUTSIDE BOARD AND COMMITTEE MEETINGS (15 MIN.) STUDY ITEMS 1. Utility Rate Analysis & future adoption of a Utility Rate Ordinance (30 min) 2. Indigenous Peoples Land Acknowledgment for Public Meetings (20 min) ACTION ITEM 1. Draft Urban Forest Management Plan (30 min) MAYOR'S COMMENTS (5 MIN.) COUNCIL COMMENTS (10 MIN.) CONVENE IN EXECUTIVE SESSION REGARDING PENDING OR POTENTIAL LITIGATION PER RCW 42.30.110(1)(1). (30 MIN.) RECONVENE IN OPEN SESSION. POTENTIAL ACTION AS A RESULT OF MEETING IN EXECUTIVE SESSION. ADJOURN Edmonds City Council Agenda June 25, 2019 Page 1 4.1 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 06/25/2019 Approval of Council Special Meeting Minutes of June 18, 2019 Staff Lead: Scott Passey Department: City Clerk's Office Preparer: Scott Passey Background/History N/A Staff Recommendation Review and approve the draft meeting minutes on the Consent Agenda. Narrative N/A Attachments: 06-18-2019 Draft Council Special Meeting Minutes Packet Pg. 2 4.1.a EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING DRAFT MINUTES JUNE 189 2019 Elected Officials Present Diane Buckshnis, Councilmember Mike Nelson, Councilmember Adrienne Fraley-Monillas, Council President Dave Teitzel, Councilmember Tom Mesaros, Councilmember Kristiana Johnson, Councilmember Neil Tibbott, Councilmember Dave Earling, Mayor Elected Officials Absent Mike Nelson, Councilmember Staff Present Jeff Taraday, City Attorney Rob English, City Engineer CALL TO ORDER/CONVENE IN JURY MEETING ROOM At 6:20 p.m., the City Council Special Meeting was called to order by Mayor Earling in the Council Chambers, 250 5t' Avenue North, Edmonds. 2. EXECUTIVE SESSION: PENDING OR POTENTIAL LITIGATION The City Council then adjourned to the Jury Meeting Room in closed session to discuss pending or potential litigation per RCW 42.30.110(1)(i). 3. CANDIDATE INTERVIEWS FOR APPOINTMENT TO A CITY BOARD OR COMMISSION At approximately 6:27 p.m., the executive session concluded and the Council interviewed Suzanne Herivel Maloney, candidate for appointment to the Edmonds Public Facilities District. The Council then interviewed the following students for appointment to the Edmonds Youth Commission: Sydney Pearson, Alissa Berman, Jacob Sawyer, Caroline Wills, and Brook Roberts. ADJOURN At 6:58 p.m., the meeting was adjourned. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes June 18, 2019 Page 1 Packet Pg. 3 4.2 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 06/25/2019 Approval of Council Meeting Minutes of June 18, 2019 Staff Lead: Scott Passey Department: City Clerk's Office Preparer: Scott Passey Background/History N/A Staff Recommendation Review and approve the draft meeting minutes on the Consent Agenda. Narrative N/A Attachments: 06-18-2019 Draft Council Meeting Minutes Packet Pg. 4 4.2.a EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL DRAFT MINUTES June 18, 2019 ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT Dave Earling, Mayor Adrienne Fraley-Monillas, Council President Michael Nelson, Councilmember Kristiana Johnson, Councilmember Thomas Mesaros, Councilmember Diane Buckshnis, Councilmember Dave Teitzel, Councilmember Neil Tibbott, Councilmember 1. CALL TO ORDER/FLAG SALUTE STAFF PRESENT Ken Ploeger, Police Sergeant David Machado, Police Sergeant Phil Williams, Public Works Director Carrie Hite, Parks, Rec. & Cult. Serv. Dir. Patrick Doherty, Econ. Dev & Comm. Serv. Dir Shane Hope, Development Services Director Scott James, Finance Director Kernen Lien, Environmental Program Mgr. Shannon Burley, Deputy Parks Director Rob English, City Engineer Ed Sibrel, Capital Projects Manager Jeff Taraday, City Attorney Scott Passey, City Clerk Jerrie Bevington, Camera Operator Jeannie Dines, Recorder The Edmonds City Council meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Mayor Earling in the Council Chambers, 250 5' Avenue North, Edmonds. The meeting was opened with the flag salute. 2. ROLL CALL City Clerk Scott Passey called the roll. All elected officials were present. 3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA COUNCIL PRESIDENT FRALEY-MONILLAS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO APPROVE THE AGENDA IN CONTENT AND ORDER. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 4. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS COUNCILMEMBER MESAROS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT FRALEY- MONILLAS, TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. The agenda items approved are as follows: 1. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES OF JUNE 4, 2019 2. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF JUNE 4, 2019 3. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES OF JUNE 11, 2019 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes June 18, 2019 Page 1 Packet Pg. 5 4.2.a 4 APPROVAL OF CLAIM, PAYROLL AND BENEFIT CHECKS, DIRECT DEPOSIT AND WIRE PAYMENTS 5. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF CLAIM FOR DAMAGES 6. APRIL 2019 MONTHLY FINANCIAL REPORT 7. PFD BOARD CANDIDATE CITY COUNCIL APPOINTMENT 8. CONFIRM APPOINTMENT OF CANDIDATES FOR THE YOUTH COMMISSION 9. CONFIRM APPOINTMENT OF CANDIDATE TO A BOARD OR COMMISSION 10. CONFIRM APPOINTMENT OF CANDIDATE TO A BOARD OR COMMISSION it. BARNARD SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT 12. AUTHORIZATION FOR MAYOR TO SIGN AN INTERGOVERNMENTAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH THE SNOHOMISH COUNTY, FOR DEVELOPMENT OF AN ON- GOING WATER QUALITY MONITORING PROGRAM FOR LAKE BALLINGER 13. AUTHORIZATION FOR MAYOR TO SIGN AN INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF MOUNTLAKE TERRACE FOR AQUATIC VEGETATION REMOVAL IN LAKE BALLINGER 14. 10-FT SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT ALONG THE WEST PROPERTY BOUNDARY OF 625 ALDER STREET 5. PRESENTATION AND PUBLIC COMMENTS AUTHORIZATION FOR MAYOR TO SIGN A SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT WITH PARAMETRIX FOR THE EDMONDS STREET WATERFRONT CONNECTOR Mayor Earling expressed appreciation for everyone in the attendance. He described the sequence for this agenda item: staff will make a presentation, Councilmembers will have an opportunity to ask questions followed by an opportunity for public comment. He requested audience members with signs ensure there were not blocking others' views. He requested a respectful opportunity for whoever is speaking without waving and/or yelling so that everyone has an opportunity to speak. He described the light system at the podium and requested everyone remain civil. Mayor Earling provided introductory remarks: "I stand here this evening to kick off the staff presentation on the Edmonds Street Waterfront Connector, taking a moment to offer preliminary remarks to the public assembled here and, of course, the Council. The following presentation will offer important information and updates, which are of particular importance at this time of mounting public debate, as a way of clearing up any confusions or misstatements. As I've said and written before, the Waterfront Connector continues to be of grave importance to me in light of the primary duty as your Mayor: to ensure the safety of our residents, businesses and visitors — whenever and wherever they are in the community. As you know, the Waterfront District is a complex community of businesses, residences, community attractions, marine -related activities, events, and the Ferry Terminal. Hundreds of people cross the railroad tracks hourly, thousands daily, and millions yearly. What's more, at any one time there are hundreds of people present in the Waterfront District. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes June 18, 2019 Page 2 Packet Pg. 6 4.2.a And folks, all of this — residents, workers, visitors, buildings, improvements, boats and equipment — is at risk daily because of the at -grade crossings that can delay emergency -response vehicles at any time simply from passing trains; or worse - when trains stall and block both Main Street and Dayton Street, emergency response is entirely cut off for extended periods of time. And this is today's reality. Imagine the risk in, say, 20 years when instead of 40+ trains a day we see up to 100 trains a day and may be blocking instead of 1-2 hours, be blocking up to 4 hours in a 24 hour period. Instead of one or two train -related accidents or break -downs, we see several a year. This is what we have to plan for. It's not about how many incidents we have had to date or even this year. It's about the future. We plan for the future in everything we do, and the Waterfront Connector is precisely that: a project for the future of our community. At the risk of sounding dramatic, the following scenarios are very real possibilities if we do not construct the Waterfront Connector: • A kitchen fire in one of our Waterfront restaurants escalates to engulf the entire building as fire trucks cannot respond in time due to passing trains; • A diver struggling out of the water from the Dive Park suffers an embolism and needs urgent care, yet cannot be attended to in time; • A child playing on the beach with her family chokes on a toy and cannot be reached in time It is precisely these — and other — potential, tragic scenarios that we wish to prevent by proposing the construction of the Waterfront Connector. The following presentations by Mr. Williams and others will: • offer a summary of the very real safety issues we are hoping to address; • include a recap of the process we conducted to analyze 51 alternatives before choosing the Edmonds Street Waterfront Connector as the preferred alternative; • present the current design concept; and, • offer a summary of the projected costs, funding sources and next steps. And an important final note is that a key element of the next steps for this project is a thorough environmental analysis that will consider the structure's environmental and aesthetic impacts and the identification of mitigation measures — all of which we know are of vital importance to those of us in this room this evening." Public Works Director Phil Williams introduced City Engineer Rob English, Project Manager Ed Sibrel, and Sandy Glover, Project Manager, Parametrix. Mr. Williams explained this item is a supplement to the Parametrix, the lead consultant, who is joined by Tetra Tech, and a team of consultants who have been working with the City to bring the project to this point. The supplement is for a design phase to reach 30% and then 60% design which includes environmental documentation in preparation for permit applications and an environmental assessment for the project, mitigation for any impacts identified during that process, public outreach, additional education and working with stakeholders. Mr. Williams displayed a conceptual drawing of the Waterfront Connector that begins at Edmonds Street & Sunset Avenue, extends over the railroad tracks without rising up, makes a left turn and ends at the north end of the cul-de-sac attached to the parking lot at Brackett's Landing North. He identified the manmade spit, advising that the connector is north of the spit. He reviewed: • Purpose and Need o Growing rail traffic (40+ increasing to 100 trains/day) 0 2" d track construction o BNSF trains getting longer, faster, heavier which makes stopping more difficult and takes longer Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes June 18, 2019 Page 3 Packet Pg. 7 4.2.a o Increased frequency of emergency response delays o Extended closure risks 0 50 emergency calls/year to the waterfront 0 50 emergency calls/year to Marine Rescue — Fire personnel confirm they have experienced train -related delays o At -Grade C Clo suresExtendedCrossing Date Closure Description May 1, 2010 Few hours Train — pedestrian fatality July 25, 2012 Over 1 hour Disabled train October 15, 2012 Train — truck collision December 29, 2012 Train — vehicle collision September 11, 2013 45 minutes Disabled train November 15, 2013 4.5 hours Train — pedestrian fatality November 17, 2015 3+ hours Saturated railbed closed gates November 24, 2015 30 minutes Weather and high water impacts April 19, 2016 Several hours Train — pedestrian fatality April 11, 2018 Train — vehicle collision June 16, 2018 1 Train — pedestrian fatality Routine Calls to the Waterfront Call Description # of Calls Percent of Calls Medical/ALSBLS 199 67% Fire/Smoke/Electrical 21 7% Gas/Hazmat/Flammable 8 3% Water/Surf/Beach Rescue 8 3% Accident/Police Assist 6 2% Service Call/Alarm Only 30 10% Cancelled en route 23 8% Other 4 1 % Total 299 100% ■ 299 calls to the waterfront over 5 years + 5 months = 1.06 calls per week ■ Additional 1 call per week to Marine Rescue boat Graph of 24 hour distribution of emergency calls west of the tracks and gate closures at Main Street • Timeline and next steps o 2012 ■ Don't Block our Beach Rally o 2013 ■ First Responders recognition of access issues o 2014 ■ Council prioritizes and emphasizes need for access o 2015-2016 ■ Alternatives analysis 0 2017-2019 ■ Preliminary design 0 2019-2020 ■ 30% / 60% design 0 2020 ■ 90% Design 0 2021 ■ Final design • Edmonds Waterfront At -Grade Crossing Analysis Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes June 18, 2019 Page 4 Packet Pg. 8 4.2.a o Led by a task force appointed by Mayor Earling that included City staff, three citizens, representation from WSDOT including Ferries, BNSF, Sound Transit, Community Transit, co- chair by a Port Commissioner and a City Councilmember o Held 4 public meetings (in person and online) attended by over 750 community members o Held 21 advisory task force meetings o Gave 4 City Council briefings o Received 124 written comment cards, emails or surveys with over 450 specific points of feedback o Featured in 42 local media articles o Mailer sent to every physical address in Edmonds inviting people to meetings to suggest alternatives for emergency service response enhancement Phase 1 concluded with the Council's vote in late 2016 to select the Waterfront Connector as the preferred alternative. Waterfront Connector Preliminary Design Outreach 0 2 in -person public meetings attended by over 140 community members 0 4 neighborhood drop -in sessions 0 2 online open houses visited by over 700 community members 0 3 Mayor's Advisory Committee meetings 0 2 Design Committee meetings 0 2 City Council briefings o Received over 260 comments o Featured in 11 local media articles Mr. Williams reviewed the next phase to reach 30%/60% design: • Scope Review — Major tasks and how tasks fit together o Public Involvement (Tasks 202, 302, 402) ■ 3 open houses ■ 3 online open houses ■ Up to 18 informal booths ■ 6 property owner briefings ■ 6 City Council briefings o Art/Cultural Collaboration (Tasks 207, 305, 405) ■ Meetings for art integration ■ Meetings with Arts Commission ■ Up to 6 meetings with Tribes ■ Open houses o Stakeholder coordination (Tasks 203, 303, 403) ■ WDFW ■ Ecology ■ Corps of Engineers ■ BNSF ■ Parks/Planning/Building ■ Recreation and Conservation Office (RCO) ■ Fire and Rescue ■ WSDOT/WSF o Architectural Collaboration (Tasks 205, 304, 404) ■ Lighting ■ Throw barriers and rails ■ Seating ■ Plaza areas ■ Restroom plan Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes June 18, 2019 Page 5 Packet Pg. 9 4.2.a o Environmental Documentation (Tasks 214, 308) ■ Ecology Resources Analysis ■ Visual Quality Analysis ■ Hazardous Materials Analysis ■ Environmental Assessment ■ Endangered Species Act ■ National Historic Preservation Act Section 106 ■ Bridge Permit ■ Shoreline Permit ■ JARPA/HPA Application ■ SEPA Checklist ■ Cultural Resources Technical Report ■ Conduct Archaeological Inventory ■ Critical Areas Report ■ Mitigation Design ■ Proposed restoration activities ■ Monitoring plan ■ Contingency plan ■ Shading calculations and figure Cost Review Phase 2 — 60% Phase 3 — 90% Phase 4 —100% Project Totals Design $2,153,594 $891,609 $637,558 $3,682,961 M mt Reserve 150,000 150,000 50,000 350,000 Total $2,303,594 $1,041,609 $687,758 $4,032,961 Expenses 4,540 6,267 2,750 58,512 Phase Totals $2,353,134 $1,047,876 $690,463 $4,091,473 • Project Partners Project Partners Amount Phase City of Edmonds $100,000 Study $150,000 Planning BNSF Railway $50,000 Study $50,000 Planning Community Transit $5,000 Study $5,000 Planning Port of Edmonds $25,000 Study $75,000 Planning $1,500,000 Construction Sound Transit $10,000 Study $10,000 Planning Washington State $500,000 Study $700,000 Planning $6,000,000 Design/Const $1,050,000 Design/Const • Project Funding Status Grant Requests Amount Phase BUILD (Federal) $18,856,000 Construction Grant opportunities Amount Phase INFRA (Federal) TBD Construction RCO (State) TBD Construction Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes June 18, 2019 Page 6 Packet Pg. 10 4.2.a Dept of Ecology (State) TBD Construction Bicycle & Ped II (State) TBD Construction PSRC (County) TBD Construction PSAR Large Capital (State) TBD Construction Mr. Williams displayed a letter from South County Fire signed by Interim Fire Chief Doug Dahl, and highlighted the following statement: "When asked the BEST solution to adequately provide emergency response on the west side of the railroad tracks which creates an access point for emergency vehicles to respond, is the proposed waterfront connector project." Councilmember Nelson asked if any ground has been broken for the project. Mr. Williams answered no, other than samples and geotechnical, no construction has been done. Councilmember Buckshnis said in speaking with friends at WRIA 8, they believe an environmental study should be done first before anything is done related to the marine sanctuary. She asked if he was aware the marine sanctuary was on the national and local register, recalling a statement that the City could write a variance for the connector to go over a marine sanctuary. Mr. Williams said when he was asked about the marine sanctuary, he interpreted the question to mean the one set up by the City in 1982 and that was the basis of his response. Councilmember Buckshnis said the Brackett's Landing shoreline sanctuary is reserved solely to provide public, scientists and students the opportunity to examine over a time of time the ecological relationship within such an area. She asked if he was saying the addition of a massive concrete structure would not violate this law. Mr. Williams said yes, Section 125.32.120 talks about the permit program in a marine sanctuary that's established by the City; if there is a question of public safety, a permit can be issued. Councilmember Buckshnis said that is only if there are no other areas available; in this case there are other areas available than the marine sanctuary. Councilmember Buckshnis pointed out it is also a Washington Department Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) conservation sanctuary. She asked whether WDFW needed to be asked before further design was done and $2.3M expended. Mr. Williams said WDFW was listed as one of the project's primary stakeholders. Staff has already had conversations with WDFW. Councilmember Buckshnis said she spoke WDFW today and they would like to see why the City was not doing the EIS and SEPA themselves. Mr. Williams said he was confused by the last part of Councilmember Buckshnis' statement, why the City was not doing the environmental work ourselves. Councilmember Buckshnis pointed out the City did their own SEPA for the Waterfront Center. Mr. Williams said Edmonds will be the responsible official for the SEPA and NEPA with assistance from the consultant as their expertise is necessary. Councilmember Buckshnis said the environmental aspects should be done first before signing any contracts that are bundled into this contact for $2.3M. She pointed out there is $300,000 for environmental aspects. Mr. Williams explained additional design is necessary to get the information necessary to do the right job on environmental documentation; locations need identified and documentation collected with that in mind. A higher level of design is needed to do a good job on the environmental documentation. This next phase is to collect data about environmental impacts and the City will be the sponsor. Councilmember Mesaros referred to comments he has heard about parking at the foot of the connector and asked about existing parking in the area by the restrooms. Mr. Williams said he did not have the current number of spaces with him, but could provide it. The current design either eliminates 0-2 spaces. Councilmember Mesaros summarized there would still be parking there and the most that would be lost would be two. Ms. Glover concurred. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes June 18, 2019 Page 7 Packet Pg. 11 4.2.a Councilmember Mesaros relayed after a meeting today with Fire Chief Dahl on another subject, he mentioned the timeline on this project to him. Chief Dahl recalled being a Battalion Captain in Edmonds when discussions began in 2009. Councilmember Mesaros said this topic has been under discussion for 10 years and the City needs to make choices about whether it wants to continue taking the risks it has taken over the last 10 years especially with increases in rail traffic. Mr. Williams displayed a video clip taken by a friend, an Edmonds dentist, on March 2019 on a ferry coming to Edmonds about 10 p.m. of an unresponsive young woman. Ferry personnel are providing first aid and the aid unit met the ferry and drove onto boat. When the aid unit left the ferry, it was delayed by a passing train. His friend, who has been taking the ferry for 20+ years, said these anecdotes are not uncommon. Council President Fraley-Monillas said she has heard about double tracking in Edmonds for over 10 years, probably more like 15 years. She understands BNSF will install double tracks one day but she was not convinced they would do it any time soon. Mr. Williams said it is designed; BNSF refused to show the City the design but allow the consultant to look at the design. BNSF has plans and specifications for double tracks ready to go; it is a question of sequencing it into their capital program. Council President Fraley- Monillas reiterated she has heard that for quite a while. Council President Fraley-Monillas referred to the table of Recent Extended At -Grade Crossing Closures, pointing out three of the four pedestrian fatalities have been suicides. She asked how the bridge would resolve suicides. Mr. Williams agreed it would not although a 4 quadrant gate might help. Council President Fraley-Monillas said the documentation is not quite complete with regard to pedestrian fatalities when the majority have been suicides. Mr. Williams said the point is not whether the person in the fatality would have been saved, it is the resulting delay that it caused. Council President Fraley-Monillas referred to comments about the safety of residents and visitors and asked how many fatalities there have been on Hwy 99 between 2010-2019. Mr. Williams said in the past three years there has been one pedestrian fatality and no fatal vehicle accidents on Hwy 99 within Edmonds. Council President Fraley-Monillas commented it was a matter of making choices and priorities regarding projects. She acknowledged the money that has been approved for this could not be moved to projects on Hwy 99, it was allocated for a specific purpose. She was concerned the City was not prioritizing the safety of citizens who live along the Hwy 99 corridor. Not only was the City not prioritizing redevelopment of the road, but also sidewalks, lighting, etc. in residential areas of the corridor. She found it hypocritical for the City to be worried about safety on west side of tracks and not people of color and the working class neighborhoods along Hwy 99. The City is not doing a good job prioritizing projects in other areas. Mr. Williams said although he does not live in Edmonds, it feels like home. He took issue with the statement that the City was not prioritizing Hwy 99. The City received a $1 OM grant from the State to begin the process of modernizing Hwy 99, making it a safer corridor, hoping to slow speeds, intersection projects, etc. He assured the City was working that problem as hard as they can. Council President Fraley-Monillas understood he felt that way but the City has been allocated $1 OM out of a $150M project of which the City received $1 M three years ago out of the $1 OM and $300,000 in the most recently biennium. She understands the City does not control those funds, but if the City had prioritized Hwy 99 as high as this bridge, the City would have had the money for Hwy 99. She had concerns with continuing this project based on other projects that are needed. She expressed appreciation for Mr. Williams and his staff s work on this project. Councilmember Tibbott referred to the table of Recent Extended At -Grade Crossing Closures and asked if there were any difficulties on the west side of the tracks as a result of the delays and if so, how were they handled. Mr. Williams referred to a photograph of an aid unit on the east side of the tracks with a stopped train in the background. He recalled there were two medical calls while the train was delayed for several Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes June 18, 2019 Page 8 Packet Pg. 12 4.2.a hours, one was a woman giving birth and a person who broke their ankle. BNSF does not want people climbing through their trains or in between the train cars. First responders are trained to help people; they put the woman on a gurney and passed her through a boxcar to reach the aid car. The same thing was done with the person with the broken ankle. He summarized emergency personnel did their best, it was not ideal and it delayed their response significantly. Councilmember Tibbott asked if there was documentation regarding other times that delays caused problems on the west side of the tracks. Mr. Williams explained Fire District 1/South County Fire's database does not document that. There is a longer average response time to the west side of the tracks but the data does not document why. Undoubtedly, some of the delays are due to trains. Councilmember Tibbott asked how many trains passed through Edmonds in 2010 compared to 2012. He first became aware of this issue when the rally was held in 2012. Mr. Williams said no one consistently counts the trains and BNSF will not provide that information. When the trains have been counted for short periods of time, he recalled 35-40 trains/day in 2012 and now there are approximately 45 trains. The number of trains appears to be growing. The number increased with coal trains but those have been decreasing. None of the projections included coal and oil trains, it was freight and passenger trains. There is expected to be a large increase in freight trains over time. Councilmember Tibbott was frustrated there was not an accurate count. He has heard consistently since 2012 that there would be an increase in the number of trains passing through Edmonds, but he has not heard that it is actually happening. He said that would be important information to have to understand the importance of this project. Councilmember Teitzel recognized this was a complex issue and he appreciated Mr. Williams' diligence. With regard to the comments about the lack of focus on Hwy 99, and whether that effort is being deprioritized in favor of the Waterfront Connector, he pointed out the City is planning to install C-curbing on the Edmonds section of Hwy 99 to limit left turns to decrease accident rates for vehicles and pedestrians. He pointed out it is not a matter of either or, the City is doing both. Mr. Williams said a request has been submitted to WSDOT for an interim project with the funds available. The remainder of the $lM and $300,000 would be enough to install C-curbs which would dramatically reduce left turning accidents on Hwy 99. Councilmember Teitzel referred to comments in recent emails about a third ferry that WSF will likely implement at some point and that the real reason for the Waterfront Connector was to accommodate loading and unloading of the third ferry. He did not believe that was accurate but it was concerning to people. Mr. Williams said that is not accurate. Ferries has a 5-8 years plan and they do not have enough money to buy the boats they need to keep the ferry inventory where it should be. The Olympic class 144 car boats are WSF's swiss army knife. The super jumbos on the Edmonds -Kingston run, like the Walla Walla and the Spokane or on the Bainbridge run, are not as cost effective to operate although there are plans to electrify a couple. Ultimately WSF wants to go from a two big boat operation between Edmonds and Kingston to a three smaller boat operation. Mr. Williams assured that would not change anything about the Waterfront Connector because it will not be used to load and unload ferries. If a train was blocking both crossings and it appeared it would be for an extended period and the ferry was about to dock or had docked, there is a possibility that the boat could be unloaded over the Waterfront Connector, leaving the biggest rigs on the dock. That could happen a few times a year but would not be the normal day-to-day operation. The only vehicles that would access this structure would be emergency response vehicles. Councilmember Teitzel asked how Council could be assured that loading and unloading of ferries would not be the standard practice. Mr. Williams said there would be an operating agreement between City and WSF that spells out exactly how it would be used. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes June 18, 2019 Page 9 Packet Pg. 13 4.2.a Councilmember Johnson referred to the cost of phases, pointing out Phase 2 was 60%, but her understanding was the next phase was 30%, 60% and 90% design. Mr. Williams said Phase 2 is 30% with public input and taking the result of the 30% design to 60% design in Phase 2. He clarified Phase 2 was 30% and 60% design; Phase 3 is 90% and Phase 4 is 100% design. Councilmember Johnson relayed her understanding that an engineering plan was necessary to do the environmental assessment. Mr. Williams said the design did not need be beyond 60%; enough would be known at that stage to do the environmental assessment. The details occur in the 90% and 100% phases. Precise locations, material types, etc., all the information necessary to do the environmental documentation would be available at 60% design. Councilmember Johnson asked what was the least amount of engineering that needed to be done to do the environmental analysis, whether it was 30%. Mr. Williams said 30% would provide the vast majority of what would be needed to do a good job on the environmental work. Councilmember Johnson asked how much would 30% design cost if 60% was $2M. Mr. Williams estimated the cost of 30% design, environmental documentation, and the public involvement would be $1.55M. Councilmember Johnson said that might be a smaller bite that the City Council would be willing to take and still make an informed decision. She pointed out the environmental analysis includes a build and no build so the Council would get a range of options to make an informed decision. Councilmember Nelson said he looked forward to hearing from the public. He relayed the following statistics: there was an average of two collisions a day, a drunk driver arrested every three days, 65 miles of roadways without sidewalks, roadways exceed the statewide average for collisions involving serious/fatal injuries to pedestrians, exceed the statewide average for crashes on major arterials by four times, and the number of fatal and serious injuries from crashes has doubled in the last five years. A lot has been said about public safety, particularly response times to the waterfront, but what are the response times to the entire city? What happened when fire services are cut? A bridge will not save someone; firefighters and paramedics will. Firefighters will always find a way to save lives and rescue the injured. Councilmember Nelson continued, today EMS cuts made by this Council in the name of efficiencies are taking longer to respond to medical emergencies citywide. Today, there is a 100% increase in the number of Lynnwood units responding to Edmonds. Today, there is a 50% increase in the number of Mountlake Terrace units responding to Edmonds. Why is a Lynnwood paramedic respond to Edmonds vehicle crashes, to swimmer rescues at Edmonds beaches? Because there are simply not enough Edmonds EMS available. There are Edmonds residents injured and waiting in pain, waiting to be saved today, not in the future, because of cuts that were made, scaring people with doomsday scenarios. The City has a fire contract that recommends removing the downtown fire station. If people want to decrease response times, bring back the 12 EMS -firefighters that were cut, the dedicated paramedic that was cut. The people of Edmonds are not buying this. He has heard from hundreds of people; it is clear the only thing that can be done is to make the following motion: COUNCILMEMBER NELSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO PROHIBIT THE MAYOR FROM SIGNING A SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT WITH PARAMETRIX FOR THE WATERFRONT CONNECTOR PROJECT. Councilmember Teitzel said he had an amendment to the motion but would first like to hear public comment. Councilmember Buckshnis said she would like the administration to discuss the local match that she found out about when she was in Washington D.C. that Mr. Williams and Mayor Earling said was 100% approved by the citizens. They did not speak about Hwy 99, only the Waterfront Connector project and how everyone was behind it. She said if that were true, there would not be 7,000+ signatures to remove the Waterfront Connector. She asked the amount the City would be required to pay up front, recalling she heard 60% in Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes June 18, 2019 Page 10 Packet Pg. 14 4.2.a Washington, D.C. Mr. Williams said that was wrong across the board as it was the match for the federal grant. The feds call it a local match, but that does not mean City of Edmonds; it is any non-federal money. The City already has $10.23M in non-federal funds; the $8.55M available to spend on design and construction is all non-federal money so it is all local match. The City currently needs 40-60% local match. The City would need a BUILD grant in the amount indicated to supplement the current funding. If a local (non-federal money) match was needed, there would be about a $2.73 gap in the necessary funds. Councilmember Buckshnis said the Council was never made aware of this until she went to Washington D.C. which she anticipated would have been a deal breaker at the beginning in addition to there being a marine sanctuary. Mr. Williams said that is not correct, he has mentioned several times during presentations that federal transportation grants have changed compared to the past. The City used to get funds that required no local match such as the roundabout and the 228t"/Hwy 99 project. Typically the local match was 13.5% which includes state money to match an 86.5% federal grant. That changed a couple years ago and more match is required which is why the project funding looks this way. He agreed the City would need to come up with more money but he has been saying that all along. Mayor Earling was baffled with as many presentations as have been made with Councilmember Buckshnis' comment that there was 100% support by citizens. That was never the case, they stated there had been two votes by the Council and a majority were in support. Mr. Williams was clear about matching funds and none of the discussion included the amount the City had contributed other than the City's $250,000. The next phase would be funded using State money and no additional funds from Edmonds. He was sorry there was this much misinformation and for Mr. Williams to be the whipping post when it was simply not the truth. Councilmember Mesaros stated he was originally appointed to the Council and later reelected. He recalled when he was interviewed by the Council, one of the questions was whether he was supportive of emergency access to the waterfront. He was in support of it. At that time there was no design, no location, and no inkling of what it would look like but it was priority to solve. The Council seems to have lost focus on that, the sense of importance. The connector began the same way as tonight's meeting; people were so concerned that they demonstrated on the waterfront encouraging the City to solve the problem. Maybe this solution is not to people's liking, but just dismissing it does not solve the problem. Councilmember Mesaros explained the task force that Port Commissioner Orvis and Councilmember Nelson co-chaired looked at 51 options. He believed that somewhere in those 51 was another serviceable option. That group recommended this location and the Council unanimously approved it. He recognized things change but there did not need to be contention in making that change but instead there should be reasonable discussion in making a change. He was highly disappointed since the Council all voted to move the project forward, many were now approaching it from a contentious standpoint instead of what is the best answer for Edmonds. Councilmember Mesaros said in his opinion there was not have enough information and an environmental impact study needed to be done to find out the facts. He had a sense of what the facts would be but acknowledged he could be wrong and having that data is important. He was old enough to remember a time when city governments did not want to do environmental studies because they wanted to move projects forward. It would require people advocating for the studies in order to have them done. Now, a group of people think they know what the study will say, so many do not want the study done. He preferred to have the facts. The sense of contentiousness was not good for the City and he preferred to work together to solve the problem. The initial problem is how to project people who may get harmed on the west side of tracks. Just like a fire insurance policy that people pay annually or take the risk and not have a fire insurance policy. If that's what the City decides to do, okay, but he wanted to be respectful and not throw accusations at one another. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes June 18, 2019 Page 11 Packet Pg. 15 4.2.a Council President Fraley-Monillas responded to the comment about having the facts. She acknowledged 51 different options were studied. She received approximately 400 emails, many that included different solutions to the problem. Her opposition to the project developed due to the cost and the effect on the environment, something that was not addressed initially. The Council had no idea what the cost would be or the effect on the beach environment. As time went on, the Council learned about the cost and the environment and then some objections arose. There are many different ways to create emergency access. She still believed emergency access was needed but it did not need to be a $30M project. Mayor Earling asked Mr. Williams to respond to the comment about not knowing about the cost. Mr. Williams did not recall the date of the first cost estimate, but when the connector was first contemplated, the estimated cost was $25-30M, the current estimate is $27.5M. That number has been available for a very long time. Experts and/or staff can opine on the logical environmental impacts, but the answers are not available until that work is done. This supplemental agreement with Parametrix is to do the detailed environmental work to answer questions about the environmental impacts this project might create and if there are impacts, how they would be mitigated. Council President Fraley-Monillas said she has been opposed to this project since the beginning and liked some of the other 51 alternatives better. She has never said she loved the Waterfront Connector project. She believed emergency access was needed but did not believe the City needed to spend $30M to get there. Mr. Williams clarified he was responding to when the cost estimates were known and the environmental impact. Councilmember Nelson said it was no secret that he was appointed by Mayor Earling to look into alternatives and it was no secret that he supported having a safe way to get to the other side of the tracks. His eyes were opened when the same administration with vigor decided to cut fire service and then the data said it has made the City less safe. He did not buy that the Waterfront Connector made the City more safe. He agreed there needed to be a reliable way to reach the west side of the tracks, but did not think the City needed to spend $30M. He was happy to work with anyone to consider other more affordable options find a reliable, safety way to reach the west side of tracks. Councilmember Buckshnis said she is not a scientist but found out after she voted for this location that there is a marine sanctuary and many scientists have contacted her. She has always fought for the marsh and as soon as found out about the marine sanctuary, she fought for preserving it. She apologized for her email to Mr. Williams and Mayor Earling that stated she did not know about the local match. COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER JOHNSON, TO AMEND THE MOTION TO STATE THE COUNCIL WOULD APPROVE PART OF THIS PHASE, TO GET TO 30% DESIGN AND THE ENVIRONMENT ASSESSMENT TO HAVE FACTS AND DATA IN HAND RELATIVE TO THE DEGREE TO WHICH THERE MAY OR MAY NOT BE DAMAGE TO THE MARINE ECOLOGY AT BRACKETT'S LANDING NORTH AND THE DIVE PARK. Councilmember Tibbott inquired about funding for 30% design, whether it would be $1.5M. Mr. Williams said $1.55M was the approximate cost of 30% design, environmental work and public outreach. Councilmember Tibbott asked if there was a lower amount to determine whether the marine sanctuary is buildable, whether a basic environmental assessment could be done prior to design work or does the design work need to be done. Mr. Williams said it was hard to say but 30% was a generally accepted number that most of the resource agencies that would review the environmental documentation would want to ensure the City knows enough about the project and that the documentation fits the project. Councilmember Teitzel said he respects the public process, recognizing there was an extensive effort to reach this point. He also respected the time of the people in attendance and the hundreds of emails the Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes June 18, 2019 Page 12 Packet Pg. 16 4.2.a Council received, all of which he has read. A number of the emails express concern that the project would destroy the marine environment at the dive park at Brackett's Landing North. That may or may not be true; he has seen no facts to prove it either way. As Councilmember Johnson mentioned, Councilmembers have a duty to listen to all the input and consider the data in making a decision. He needed to see data before taking a vote on the next steps. Councilmember Nelson said he was confident in saying he did not need an environmental study to tell him that putting a concrete overpass through a beach would not be helpful to the environment. UPON ROLL CALL, AMENDMENT FAILED (3-4), COUNCILMEMBERS JOHNSON, MESAROS AND TEITZEL VOTING YES; AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT FRALEY-MONILLAS AND COUNCILMEMBERS NELSON, BUCKSHNIS AND TIBBOTT VOTING NO. UPON ROLL CALL, MAIN MOTION CARRIED (4-3), COUNCIL PRESIDENT FRALEY- MONILLAS AND COUNCILMEMBERS NELSON, BUCKSHNIS AND TIBBOTT VOTING YES; AND COUNCILMEMBERS JOHNSON, MESAROS AND TEITZEL VOTING NO. Mayor Earling declared a brief recess. 7w113104.ry D[Kl]u lu l N.Y 0 A brief discussion ensued regarding whether comments should be on topics other than the Waterfront Connector as that matter had already been voted on. Council agreed to allow the public to speak on any topic including the Waterfront Connector. Roger Hertrich, Edmonds, said he had never seen as strong a reaction except for trees; the environmental question has never really been answered for a lot of people. With this many people interested in the waterfront and concerned about the environment, they should be aware that the ferry system's next move is a second slip which will be against one of the beaches. The City said no a long time ago and Ferries built a pedestrian overhead loading that could be moved and there was a plan to study alternate sites. The result of that study was the Unocal property which did not move forward due to the cost. He envisioned the future of the Edmonds waterfront with double tracks, 70-100 trains/day, and the ferry unable to operate. He suggested using the same principle of reaching the west side of tracks and engineering it into the hillside. He noted the dive park is a pristine study area, the City cannot ruin the waterfront, and the Council made the right choice. Brian Thompson relayed his understanding that there has been concern expressed with fire and medical safety in the City. In 2006, the Council passed a resolution stating 9 out of 10 calls needed to be answered timely, 1 out of 10 calls, time does not matter. Based on Parametrix's data, calls west of tracks represent about 1% of the call volume, therefore, there is no obligation to compel the fire district to do better. A presentation last month stated the fire district is failing to meet the 90%; he was curious what will happen to their compliance. With regard to the letter from Fire Chief Dahl, it was in stark contrast to statements of Chief Widdis who told the Council on July 21, 2015 that they were contemplating a potential response for an oil train accident at the ferry terminal that blocked both crossing and would render access south of Main infeasible. As the Council considers how to provide access and improving the service demanded by the resolution, he urged them keep in mind points south so that not all the connections to the waterfront are in same location. Pamela Bond, Edmonds, a member of the Snohomish Tribal Council and the Snohomish Tribe's fish, wildlife and environment director, relayed the Tribe was the second signer to Point Elliott Treaty. They have seen that voices in Edmonds are not being heard, but she was glad to witness a change tonight and she hoped that continued. Since Edmonds' inception, the City has been actively participating in environmental Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes June 18, 2019 Page 13 Packet Pg. 17 4.2.a and cultural genocide. Mr. Brackett ruined marsh lands, allowed mills to be built and felled every millable tree in the City. She hoped the Council would continue supporting the environment. This land was occupied by her people for millennia upon millennia. Although people may think there was no permanent village here, there are midden piles and archeological dig sites along Edmonds beaches. This is a cultural preservation area, not just an environmental preservation area. She hoped the Council's vote was permanent. Just as she serves her people, she reminded the Council they were voted into office to serve their people and it was a privilege to listen to citizens. She suggested if things like coal trains or fracked oil tankers come through Edmonds, maybe citizens needed to take non-violent action. She concluded the Snohomish Tribe did not receive free and informed consent and the City did not have it. Mike McMurray, Edmonds, asked if it was possible to have a motion to kill this option permanently. The Council already approved the Waterfront Connector; the motion was to kill the funding for this contractor. He requested this area be permanently protected. Most people support some kind of connector and he suggested the Dayton option as an opportunity to have a nice pedestrian walkway that would accentuate Edmonds as an art center and actually draw people to the city. He thanked the Council for their work tonight, noting 8,000 people signing a petition was a lot. Laura Johnson, Edmonds, recognized the Brackett's Landing Task Force who came to Council meetings to ask the Council to protect and preserve the waterfront. It was due to their efforts that the City has the natural beaches it has today. At that time the elected leaders listened to concerns and declared the water and the beach, the area from the ferry dock to Caspers Street, as a protected marine sanctuary. She supported the need for emergency access on the waterfront, however, as a mother of three teens, she does not ask them to avoid the waterfront due to safety concerns but does advise her teen drivers to avoid Hwy 99 because it has 4 times the number of accidents as comparable roads. In a recent letter to the editor, two pro -connector Councilmembers asked the casualty limit that triggers a response, one life lost or two? They asked this knowing full well there are documented injuries and deaths on Hwy 99. If public safety is a priority, she asked why the City doesn't put more effort there. It does not have to be done all at once; 1-2 intersections could be done at a time and the Council needs to commit to moving forward. She requested the Council put the same effort into improving safety on Hwy 99 and continue to protect and preserve the beautiful waterfront and beaches for future generations. Tara Ashton, Edmonds, Secretary of Save Richmond Beach and outreach liaison, said the connector and the public opposition reminded her of the debacle at Point Wells, the proposed site in unincorporated Snohomish County for over 3000 condos and thousands of square feet of retail, which was quickly green lighted by Snohomish County Council to be built at the end of 2-lane road. If not for the creation of Save Richmond Beach by Caycee Holt in 2011, that massive development by Blue Square Real Estate would be nearly complete. The project was denied and it is currently under appeal due to citizen involvement and grassroots outreach just like what was witnessed tonight. She was shocked and disappointed the City Council approved the Waterfront Connector in 2016. She suggested a narrow pedestrian overpass similar to the one at Richmond Beach along with a small fire station could elegantly, discretely and aesthetically serve the concerns of the Mayor, the City Council and the public. Thomas Sawtell, Edmonds, said coastal communities from San Diego to Cold Bay, Alaska are suffering with the same problems whether it is trains or tsunamis. He suggested looking for guidance from communities in Oregon who have strong watershed management, community -led grassroots organizations. What happened tonight would not happen there because stakeholders would have been brought in and marine affairs representatives would have been involved. The process was so oriented toward transportation that it left out that aspect. He applauded Councilmember Johnson's comment at the Parks & Public Works Committee that there needs to be a renewed effort to reach out to stakeholders. He relayed Meadowdale Park received funding to expand the bridge over the creek so users do not have to go over one of the most dangerous railroad tracks in the state. He referred to a comment letter from Duane Johnson that envisioned Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes June 18, 2019 Page 14 Packet Pg. 18 4.2.a an interpretive science center at Brackett's Landing Park, possibly 2 story with a walkway over the railroad. That would not be possible with the overpass. Lee Kimmelman, Edmonds, said he claimed some responsibility for the mess that happened today. He has been aware of everything that has been going on for 10 years, has read the newspaper articles, knew about the meetings but did not attend any of them because he did not realize the environmental impacts. When this issues arose two weeks ago, he was playing catch up. He was glad the public was able to catch up in time to prevent the wrong solution. To those who think this happened without proper oversight and opportunity for the public to speak their mind, there was that opportunity but the public missed it. He applauded Mr. Williams and the others involved for their efforts and diligence without an agenda or personal gain in mind. They developed what they thought was the best possible solution using the feedback they received. There is a disconnect between Hwy 99 and the Waterfront Connector. The safety issue at the waterfront is related to response time when trains block access to the waterfront and prevent emergency vehicles from crossing the tracks. The hazards on Hwy 99 are safety issues and the two issues should not be confused. Both are both serious and important but require different attention, different solutions and different resources to solve them. He applauded the Council for their decision and looked forward to seeing more community input on important issues. Bob Kleinschmidt, Edmonds, requested the speed limit on 3' North from Edmonds to Caspers be reduced to 25 mph, the same as other residential streets. With vehicles accelerating and decelerating, it is more of a noise issue but also a safety issue, particularly due to the proximity to ECA and people parking there. Bob Brown, commended the City Council for their vote to deny the Waterfront Connector. Rosy Bailer, Edmonds, said she had a great story to tell about going to Edmonds Beach with her grandma, digging a hole and watching the water pour in and a metaphor about watching money pouring into the connector, but it was unnecessary due to the Council's decision. She assured the Council that citizens know the issue of the connector is not over and citizens need to stay vigilant, present and active. She is a registered voter and is paying attention. Kelly Picasso, Edmonds, commended the Council on their vote. She has been a complacent voter in the past and vows to be a more attentive citizen. She acknowledged what it takes to be an elected official and the delicate balance between the City's economic progress, what citizens wants and the environment. When she saw the connector design, all she saw was a tombstone to her involvement. She envisioned her children, who are not old enough to vote, saying how did you let them build that, where were you? She appreciated the Council's vote tonight and vowed to pay more attention. Cam Tripp, Edmonds, said he started the petition, the Facebook account, the website, the Instagram account and the Twitter feed due to his visceral reaction when he saw what the connector would do to the beach. He was happy about the Council's action tonight but was not confident it would stick. He assured the petition will continue to be circulated, anticipating 200-300 signatures would be added per day, citizen will watch the issue all summer, TV stations will continue to cover it. He referred to 30 pages of comments from people wanting to save the beach, a 2" printout of all 8,000 signatures, the majority of which are Edmonds voters who are watching. He acknowledged the difficulty of being a public servant and thanked the Council for their service, for having the courage to make tough decisions and to change their mind. He said the number one option according to the 200 page report was the mid -block pedestrian overpass by the senior center that cost $20M less. It was higher rated than the Sunset connector and equal in safety. The public was baffled by the City spending $20M extra for an inferior solution that ruins the beach. He encouraged the Council to do the right thing, look at the report the City funded and save the beach for everyone. 8. POTENTIAL ACTION ITEMS Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes June 18, 2019 Page 15 Packet Pg. 19 4.2.a 1. ECC 5.32 AND 5.05.060, PARK RULES AND DOG RULES Parks & Recreation Carrie Hite said Jennifer Reed, Snohomish Health District, was here earlier to talk about the proposal to prohibit smoking and vaping in parks, but she had to leave. The proposed changes were discussed at the Parks & Public Works Committee and forwarded to full Council. The Edmonds City Code includes chapters on parks rules and dog rules; the park rules have not been changed for a long time. The City was approached by Snohomish County Health District to ban smoking vaping and marijuana in public parks. Parks in Edmonds have no smoking signs but it is not codified so it is not enforceable. She displayed a sign provided by Snohomish Health District, advising a reference to the ECC would be added to allow enforcement. With the change to park rules regarding smoking, staff was interested in making some other housekeeping changes. Ms. Hite reviewed: Changes to Park Rules: 1. Add a chapter to prohibit smoking, vaping, marijuana in parks. 2. Add a chapter to prohibit feeding wildlife on waterfront beaches 3. Change park hours to read " closed from sunset to sunrise" 4. Clarify chapter 5.32.030 about the allowance motor vehicles in parks 5. Clarify 5.32.040 to be consistent with the City's practice 6. Small housekeeping items a. ADA language b. Drinking of intoxicants is prohibited in parks unless authorized by a special event permit. The use of controlled substances was added. With regard to dog rules, Ms. Hite explained dogs on public grounds is addressed in ECC 5.05.060. People often call asking where they can walk their dog; staff refers them to the code which contains a list of very specific locations which is confusing. The City's animal control is reactive to problems with animals and does not patrol. Staff does "soft enforcement" such as beach rangers reminding people that dogs are not allowed on the beach. Park Maintenance Manager Rich Lindsay, who has served the City for 48 years, said the reason the dog rules were so explicit was because people did not pick up after dogs. Now people pick up after their dogs and parks have dog waste bag dispensers. The proposal is to allow dogs in parks except waterfront beaches, athletic fields, spray ground, playgrounds, and school grounds. If the change is approved, Parks is prepared to add dog waste bags, to encourage people to pick up after their dogs, launch an educational campaign, promote this as a pilot and to change the rules again if necessary. Most other cities in the Puget Sound region allow dogs in parks on leash and under voice control. Councilmember Buckshnis said she is also known as Dog Park Diane because she helped start Off Leash Area Edmonds in 2005 and knows a lot about the dog community. The changes were not done at her request. She will abstain from the vote due to her connections with the dog community and to avoid any conflict of interest but will help with publication as she writes the dog park newsletter. Council President Fraley-Monillas said she was willing to try it and see if owners are responsible. People are different than they were 20 years ago and most pets are leashed. She lives near a park that allows dogs, Mathay Ballinger, and does not see much of a problem. Councilmember Tibbott agreed with Council President Fraley-Monillas about trying it. He liked prohibiting dogs on sports fields, playgrounds, spray park, etc., commenting those restrictions area were somewhat obvious and he hoped they would be obvious to others. He asked if there was any language related to dogs staying on paths in parks. Ms. Hite said the current code identifies specific park paths; the proposal is to generally allow dogs in parks. One benefit of leashed dogs in parks, especially at Civic where there are a Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes June 18, 2019 Page 16 Packet Pg. 20 4.2.a lot of geese, is the presence of dogs will disrupt their nesting. Councilmember Tibbott commented there is a park in his neighborhood where it is difficult to tell where the sports fields end and the park begins. He assumed that would be left to the owners discretion. He supported putting up signs in parks prohibiting smoking, vaping, etc. Councilmember Teitzel agreed with doing this on trial basis. He has two dogs so may be somewhat biased. He agreed people are more responsible although it was not 100%. He inquire about the fine if someone did not pick up after their dog. Ms. Hite said it was in a different chapter and she could provide it to Council. Councilmember Teitzel asked who is authorized to ticket someone not picking up after their dog. Ms. Hite answered the animal control officer and police officers. The Parks crews are the eyes in the park and can encourage/discourage behaviors but cannot write tickets. Councilmember Teitzel asked the cost of providing dog waste bags in additional locations. Ms. Hite estimated $5,000-$6,000. Council President Fraley-Monillas referred to 5.23.020, motor vehicle prohibited in City Parks, and the statement regarding battery operated vehicles, relaying when she thinks of a battery operated vehicle, she thinks of a Tesla. Ms. Hite recalled the Planning Board discussed battery operated uniwheels, scooters, etc. and their interest in keeping them on designated roadways not paths. Council President Fraley-Monillas suggested "battery operated devices." Council President Fraley-Monillas observed horses are not allowed in parks. Ms. Hite said the current language in the code does not allow horses and "unless used for ADA purposes" was added. Council President Fraley-Monillas recalled riding her horse from Woodway to City Park as a kid. She noted pigs had been added to the list of animals not allowed in parks unless utilized for ADA purposes. Ms. Hite said someone had pig in a park recently. Councilmember Nelson said these are common sense updates. Park hours sunrise to sunset is very common, he was surprised the City did not have something in the code prohibiting smoking, it will prohibit feeding wildlife on beaches and will alleviate confusion about where dogs are allowed. He supported making the change on a trial basis. Councilmember Mesaros relayed there are now battery powered bicycles. Ms. Hite said they are allowed everywhere bicycles are allowed. COUNCIL PRESIDENT FRALEY-MONILLAS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER MESAROS TO APPROVE THE CHANGES AND PLACE AN ORDINANCE ON THE CONSENT AGENDA FOR APPROVAL. MOTION CARRIED (6-0-1), COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS ABSTAINING. 7. ACTION ITEMS 1. LAND USE PERMIT DECISION -MAKING AND QUASI-JUDICIAL PROCESS Environmental Program Manager Kernen Lien advised he will provide an overview of the proposed code amendments. A packet includes a draft ordinance; he recommended approval on Consent following Department of Commerce's review. He reviewed: • ECDC 20.01.003 — Permit Type and Decision Framework Type I TypeII Type II-B TYPE III -A Type III-B Type IV Type V Zoning Compliance Letter Accessory dwelling unit Contingent critical area review Outdoor dining Essential public facilities :Final f4mFA plat Site specific rezone Development agreements Lot line adjustment Formal I interpretation of Shoreline 1 substantial Technical I impracticality ew i. Fiplal Plamwd Development Zoning text I amendment; area I agreements Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes June 18, 2019 Page 17 Packet Pg. 21 4.2.a the text of the development waiver for hearing b residential wide zoning map ECDC by the permit, where amateur radio areh eetu-al-al development amendments director public hearing antennas design oard not required is feqtlkft� per ECDC 24.80.100 Critical area SEPA Critical area Comprehensive determinations determinations variance lap amendments Shoreline Preliminary Contingent Conditional Annexations exemptions short plat critical area use permits review if (where public public hearing hearing by requested hearing examiner is required) Minor Land Shoreline Variances Development amendments to clearing/grading substantial regulations planned development residential permit where development public hearing is required per ECDC 24.80.100 Minor Revisions to Shoreline 149me preliminary plat shoreline conditional eeeupAien amendment management use pef ffli r-e permits publie hearing by heafing e�an3iner�s Staff design Administrative Shoreline Pr�i review, including variances variance f4mal-plat signs Final short plat Land use permit Design ;pr-el i ^,,.warp extension review planned requests where esi ial ublic dev hearing by architectural design board Lis required) Sales Guest house Preliminary office/model lap nned (ECDC residential 17.70.005) development Final formal Innocent plats purchaser determination Final planned residential development B. Optional Consolidated Permit Processing. An application that involves two or more procedures may be processed collectively under the highest numbered procedure required for any part of the application or may be processed individually under each of the application procedures identified in ECDC 20.01.003. The applicant may determine whether the application will be processed collectively or individually. If the applications are processed individually, the highest numbered type procedure shall be undertaken first, followed by the other procedures in sequence from the highest numbered to the lowest. When Type III -A and Type III-B permits are consolidated under this subsection, the proiect shall proceed under the Type III -A permit process. • Type IV -A: Subdivisions and PRDs o City Council approves final formal subdivisions and Planned Residential Developments Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes June 18, 2019 Page 18 Packet Pg. 22 Q 4.2.a o All requirements of preliminary approval of been met o Often all of the subdivision improvements are installed prior to application for final approval o Senate Bill 5674 allows legislative authority to be delegated to administrative personnel o Amendments to ECDC 20.75 and ECDC 20.35 delegate City Council's role in reviewing final formal subdivisions ECDC 170.00.030 - Public Agency Variances o C. Public Structures and Uses. All public structures and uses built or altered by the city or any other public agency shall comply with this zoning ordinance. Where it is a public necessity to build, or alter, a structure or use in a location or in a manner not complying with this zoning ordinance, a variance may be considered. In this case, the action of the hearing examiner shall be a recommendation to the city council. ECDC 20.100.040 Review of Approved Permits o Conflicts with state law ■ Regulatory Reform Act, Chapter 36.70B RCW - One open record public hearing - ECDC 20.100.040 could result in endless public hearings ■ Land Use Petition Act, Chapter 36.70C RCW - "Finality" - Once a land use permit has been approved and no appeal has been timely filed, the land use permit can no longer by judicially appealed even if it did not comply with permitting criteria when approved (Chelan County v. Nykreim) - Habitat Watch v. Skagit County - Projects cannot be collaterally attacked through another administrative permit review process ■ New section ECDC 20.110.045 added to code enforcement chapter that all the City to suspend or revoke a permit that fails to comply with conditions of approval or which operates in a manner inconsistent with the representations made in the application ECDC 20.06 Open Record Public Hearings and 20.07 Closed Recording Public Hearings o Confusing cross references regarding appeals o Combine into a single chapter o Added some language for prehearing conferences o Added some details regarding briefing order, rebuttals and questions during hearings Development Agreements o Change Development Agreement from Type V legislative decision to a Type IV quasi-judicial decision with recommendation from the Planning Board to City Council o Council considers development agreement in closed record review o Likely process in conjunction with site specific rezone ... Councilmember Buckshnis thanked Mr. Lien for the recap, summarizing there will still be quasi-judicial review but not for large projects. Mr. Lien answered essentially yes, there are three type of permits appealable to the Council: essential public facilities, conditional use permits, and variances. Councilmember Buckshnis asked why Department of Commerce approval was required. Mr. Lien answered it is a change to a development regulation that requires notice to Commerce. For Councilmember Buckshnis, Mr. Lien described the combination of 20.06 and 20.07. Councilmember Tibbott asked how conflicts between the RCWs and ECDC were rectified. Mr. Lien answered 21.00.040 was deleted. Recognizing the City still wants the ability to suspend or revoke a permit that is not complying with conditions of approval or was achieved under false information, a new section, 20.110.045, was added to recognize the City's ability revoke a permit in certain situations. Councilmember Tibbott observed a development agreement was similar to a site specific rezone. It was his understanding there would not be a closed record review on development agreements; the Planning Board would provide a recommendation to the City Council. Mr. Lien explained currently development Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes June 18, 2019 Page 19 Packet Pg. 23 4.2.a agreements are a Type V legislative process which allows an open record hearing at the Planning Board and at the City Council. Moving it to a Type IV, the open record occurs at the Planning Board and a closed record review occurs at the City Council. Councilmember Tibbott asked about advantage of a closed record review. City Attorney Jeff Taraday referred to other Type V actions in the table such as zoning, text amendments, area wide zoning map amendments, comprehensive plan amendments, all things that are not one parcel and are appropriately Type V. Development agreements will usually have one applicant similar to a site specific rezone. It sets up a proponent -applicant situation and the Type IV process is more appropriate because of the site specific nature and the likelihood that one person will have a vested interest in lobbying for their application. Councilmember Tibbott assumed disclosures, potential disagreements with neighbors, etc. would be addressed during the Planning Board hearing but the City Council would not have opportunity to discover additional information. Mr. Taraday said if Council approved that change, the typical quasi-judicial limitations would apply to the development agreement such as no ex parte communication, no evidence outside the record, etc. Councilmember Tibbott asked how that is handled in other cities. Development Services Director Shane Hope answered it is mixed, one of the reason other cities have gone to a quasi-judicial process rather than a legislative was because at one time people thought of development agreements as a rezone opportunity specific to one property. Under state law an applicant for a development agreement cannot rezone the property. Councilmember Tibbott summarized development agreements have more limited use now. Councilmember Buckshnis said the City has not had any development agreements in the last 9 years. She agreed with having it be quasi-judicial and asked if a development agreement could be used as an incentive for a developer. She recalled Mr. Taraday saying development agreements were used in Seattle to encourage escalators. Mr. Taraday said the discussion Councilmember Buckshnis recalled pertained to incentive zoning rather than development agreements. Escalators can be incentivized via the zoning code. He said Ms. Hope was correct in saying that under state law development agreement have to be consistent with development regulations; an applicant cannot use a development agreement to create exceptions to development regulations. Where a development agreement was most likely to occur in Edmonds was an applicant proposing a site specific rezone combined with a development agreement that limits the use of the property to a particular use. In the past that was called a concomitant agreement, it is now called a development agreement. This would allow those two things to proceed together using the same Type IV process so the site specific rezone and the development agreement could be considered on a parallel track. For Councilmember Buckshnis, Mr. Lien explained a site specific rezone and development agreement would go to the Planning Board and then to the Council and any subsequent development would follow the appropriate process. COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER MESAROS, TO MOVE THE ORDINANCE PROVIDED IN EXHIBIT 1 TO A FUTURE CONSENT AGENDA TO BE ADOPTED FOLLOWING THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE NOTICE PERIOD. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. COUNCILMEMBER MESAROS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL, TO EXTEND THE MEETING UNTIL 10:05 P.M. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 8. POTENTIAL ACTION ITEMS (Con't) 2. UTILITY RATE ANALYSIS & FUTURE ADOPTION OF A UTILITY RATE ORDINANCE Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes June 18, 2019 Page 20 Packet Pg. 24 4.2.a Due to the late hour, This item was postponed to a future meeting. 9. REPORTS ON COUNCIL COMMITTEES 1. MONTHLY COUNCIL SUBCOMMITTEE REPORTS AND MINUTES Due to the late hour, this item was omitted from the agenda. 10. MAYOR'S COMMENTS Mayor Earling reported the Arts Festival was a tremendous success. It was fun to see the arts being celebrated and the first Saturday Market was also very successful. Mayor Earling relayed with the action the Council took tonight, he will notify the state and federal legislators that the interest in the connector has been withdrawn as well as notify the legislature that the City no longer needs $7.05M and he assumed the Port will withdraw their $1.5M contribution. 11. COUNCIL COMMENTS Councilmember Teitzel reported he also attended the Arts Festival. He thanked Councilmember Buckshnis and Councilmember Johnson for service at the beverage garden. Councilmember Tibbott said tonight he voted not to move forward with the connector, a vote that surprised a lot of people so he wanted to explain the reasoning behind his decision. He has spent a considerable amount of time talking with people, and the Council has heard a lot of public comment. He has heard a common theme, a desire to preserve the waterfront as a natural amenity for the City in perpetuity and the fear that a concrete structure on the waterfront would destroy it. Interestingly, that sentiment came from a diversity of people across the spectrum of the City. That caused him to realize something about the process; somehow the City missed an important part of process, engaging the public about their vision of the waterfront. When the idea of an at -grade crossing study was first proposed, he assumed it would be some kind of crossing from Sunset down to the waterfront. He didn't realize, 1) how the big structure would need to be to transport vehicles, and 2) what it would mean to the waterfront. Councilmember Tibbott said as a Councilmember he wants to do better getting public input, to better anticipate options for consideration, how it will impact citizens and to ensure the taskforce is proactive. He expressed interest in redouble efforts to solicit a wide range of opinions. As a result of that discovery, he could not support going forward with connector. He offered to work with the Council President to bring forward a study item to review the actions of the task force that looked at the 51 options to recap what happened and to understand the process. He was also interested in summarizing what the Council heard from the public during this process. He suggested setting a deadline to complete a study/review of the task force's efforts and the public response. Councilmember Tibbott said people still want some kind of access to the west side of the tracks in the event of a train blockage and suggested looking at short term public safety options to protect people on the waterfront side of the tracks and create options for response that could include emergency response via water and/or materials/equipment on the waterfront to facilitate an emergency response until an access is developed. Councilmember Tibbott recognized the Council put Mayor Earling in an awkward position. The task force was commissioned, the task force provided a recommendation, the Council voted unanimously to move forward and then the Council backed away. He wanted to figure out what happened, what changed and when it changed, when new information arose, and how could the Council have respond earlier. He Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes June 18, 2019 Page 21 Packet Pg. 25 4.2.a summarized it was important to review what happened with the task force, summarize the public's comments and explore options for safety measures that could be implemented in the near future. COUNCILMEMBER MESAROS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL, TO EXTEND THE MEETING UNTIL 10:10 P.M. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Council President Fraley-Monillas said she was a little confused by Councilmember Tibbott's statement and she and he will need to talk about what he wants to have occur next. She thanked staff and citizens who came out tonight and spoke and all the work that has been done. It has been an enormous feat of work by everyone. She said the Council recent retreat included discussion about engaging the public; it seems the public is coming out later and later, clearly the City is doing something wrong. The City needs to do a better job notifying people and getting people engaged. The lack of full public engagement was the problem. She appreciated everyone who came to tonight's meeting; the Council has received hundreds of emails. With regard to public safety options, she suggested reaching out to police and fire regarding their emergency response protocols if a train is blocking and something occurs on the west side of the tracks. She recognized that some people were disappointed they did not have the opportunity to speak tonight. Councilmember Buckshnis thanked everyone who visited her at the grotto this weekend and thanked Councilmember Johnson for her assistance. With regard to the connector, she has always been a proponent of the marsh and buffers and wished that the marine sanctuary, which was established in 1970, had been brought up right away. The public got involved once they found out what was going on. She appreciated all the work everyone has done including Mayor Earling's efforts at the state and federal level. The City has to reassess a location that will not ruin open space for future generations. Councilmember Nelson said he was interested in moving forward and finding another option to provide emergency access to the other side of the tracks that does not harm the natural environment. He believed that solution could be identified and looked forward to working with Councilmembers and the public to achieve that. In response to Councilmember Buckshnis' comments, Mayor Earling said when he, Councilmember Buckshnis and staff were in Washington D.C., they spoke about the Waterfront Connector and the marsh. 12. CONVENE IN EXECUTIVE SESSION REGARDING PENDING OR POTENTIAL LITIGATION PER RCW 42.30.110(1)(i) This item was not needed. 13. RECONVENE IN OPEN SESSION. POTENTIAL ACTION AS A RESULT OF MEETING IN EXECUTIVE SESSION This item was not needed. 14. ADJOURN With no further business, the Council meeting was adjourned at 10:10 p.m. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes June 18, 2019 Page 22 Packet Pg. 26 4.3 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 06/25/2019 Approval of claim, payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire payments. Staff Lead: Scott James Department: Administrative Services Preparer: Nori Jacobson Background/History Approval of claim checks #237341 through #237437 dated June 20, 2019 for $872,505.55 (re -issued checks #237376 $600.00 and #237380 $200.00) and wire payment of $9,864.94. Approval of payroll direct deposit and checks #63752 through #63758 for $582,089.09, benefit checks #63759 through #63763 and wire payments of $585,818.10 for the pay period June 1, 2019 through June 15, 2019. Staff Recommendation Approval of claim, payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire payments. Narrative In accordance with the State statutes, City payments must be approved by the City Council. Ordinance #2896 delegates this approval to the Council President who reviews and recommends either approval or non -approval of expenditures. Attachments: claims 06-20-19 wire 06-20-19 FrequentlyUsedProjNumbers 06-20-19 payroll summary 06-20-19 payroll benefits 06-20-19 Packet Pg. 27 4.3.a vchlist Voucher List Page: 06/20/2019 7:51:40AM City of Edmonds L 3 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account .y Amoun 0 a m 237341 6/20/2019 062614 ABPA 48662950 2019 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL- J K 2019 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL- J K U 421.000.74.534.80.49.00 85.0( Total: 85.0( ui 237342 6/20/2019 000850 ALDERWOOD WATER DISTRICT 10462 MONTHLY WHOLESALE WATER Cl- MONTHLY WHOLESALE WATER Cl- U 421.000.74.534.80.33.00 184,794.4( Total: 184,794.4( d 237343 6/20/2019 071634 ALLSTREAM 16196849 C/A 768328 PR1-1 & 2 City Phone Service 512.000.31.518.88.42.00 11006.6( o Tourism Toll free lines 877.775.6929; 001.000.61.558.70.42.00 10.3" a Econ Devlpmnt Toll free lines 001.000.61.558.70.42.00 10.3' •� Total: 1,027.2: 237344 6/20/2019 001528 AM TEST INC 110718 WWTP: TEST SAMPLE # 10-AO0635 4- 0 TEST SAMPLE # 10-AO06355-6356 7a > 0 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 205.0( a Total: 205.0( Q 237345 6/20/2019 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 1991263683 FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS c� FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS c 001.000.66.518.30.24.00 31.4 1 10.4% Sales Tax c 001.000.66.518.30.24.00 3.2, E 1991273594 FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS M FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS z 001.000.66.518.30.24.00 31.4, 10.4% Sales Tax E 001.000.66.518.30.24.00 3.2 � t 1991279241 PUBLIC WORKS CIVIC LOBBY MATE Q Page: 1 Packet Pg. 28 vchlist 06/20/2019 7:51:40AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 237345 6/20/2019 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE 001.000.65.518.20.41.00 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE 111.000.68.542.90.41.00 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE 422.000.72.531.90.41.00 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE 423.000.75.535.80.41.00 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.65.518.20.41.00 10.4% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.90.41.00 10.4% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 10.4% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.41.00 10.4% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.41.00 10.4% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 1991279242 FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS & MAT FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS 511.000.77.548.68.24.00 FLEET DIVISION MATS 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 10.4% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.24.00 10.4% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 1991283504 WWTP: 6/12/19 UNIFORMSJOWEL 4.3.a Page: 2 aD L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 a m 1.6' u L_ 6.1' N 6.1- v 6.1' 4- m c 6.1' c 6.0£ f° 0 L 0.1 i a 0.6, E 0.6z ,- 0 0.6z > 0 L 0.6z a Q 0.6' 0 N 9.2� o E 19.1(M 0.9-, aD 1.9£ t U �a Q Page: 2 Packet Pg. 29 vchlist 06/20/2019 7:51:40AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 4.3.a Page: 3 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account a� L 3 c �a Amoun N 237345 6/20/2019 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES (Continued) 0 m Mats/Towels 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 47.8£ u Uniforms L 423.000.76.535.80.24.00 3.5( 10.4% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 4.9£ 10.4% Sales Tax U 423.000.76.535.80.24.00 0.3E 1991283505 PARKS MAINT UNIFORM SERVICE c PARKS MAINT UNIFORM SERVICE 001.000.64.576.80.24.00 51.5E 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.24.00 5.3E o 1991283506 FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS >+ FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS a 001.000.66.518.30.24.00 31.4, 10.4% Sales Tax ca 001.000.66.518.30.24.00 3.2, ,u Total: 284.6E 0 237346 6/20/2019 071124 ASSOCIATED PETROLEUM 1443558-IN WWTP: DIESEL FUEL o L ULSD #2 DYED - BULK fuel (include a 423.000.76.535.80.32.00 4,567.7, Q 10.4% Sales Tax rn 423.000.76.535.80.32.00 475.0z 1446639-IN WWTP: 6/11/19 DIESEL FUEL N 6/11/19 ULSD #2 DYED - BULK fuel 0 423.000.76.535.80.32.00 2,678.8E 10.4% Sales Tax E 423.000.76.535.80.32.00 278.6' u Total : 8,000.2: }; c 237347 6/20/2019 075390 AUSTIN MAC INC 29540 WWTP: REDUCERS 0 E reducers 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 5,956.2( Q Page: 3 Packet Pg. 30 vchlist 06/20/2019 7:51:40AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 4.3.a Page: 4 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 237347 6/20/2019 075390 AUSTIN MAC INC (Continued) 10.4% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 619.4z Total: 6,575.6' 237348 6/20/2019 003001 BUILDERS SAND & GRAVEL 331435 PW YARD - GRAVEL PW Yard - Gravel 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 979.9E PW Yard - Gravel 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 979.9E PW Yard - Gravel 422.000.72.531.40.31.00 979.9f PW Yard - Gravel 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 979.9E 10.4% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 101.91 10.4% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 101.91 10.4% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.40.31.00 101.91 10.4% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 101.9- Total : 4,327.55 237349 6/20/2019 076240 CADMAN MATERIALS INC 1666848 STREET - SUPPLIES Street - Supplies 111.000.68.542.61.31.00 565.0( 7.7% sales tax 111.000.68.542.61.31.00 43.5- 1667261 STREET - SUPPLIES Street - Supplies 111.000.68.542.61.31.00 542.3' 7.7% sales tax 111.000.68.542.61.31.00 41.7E 1668370 STREET SUPPLIES Street Supplies Page: 4 Packet Pg. 31 vchlist 06/20/2019 7:51:40AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 4.3.a Page: 5 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account a� L 3 c �a Amoun y 237349 6/20/2019 076240 CADMAN MATERIALS INC (Continued) 0 111.000.68.542.61.31.00 as 275.9( -0 7.7% sales tax 111.000.68.542.61.31.00 m 21.21 .L 1668603 STREET - SUPPLIES Street - Supplies 111.000.68.542.61.31.00 488.4; 7.7% sales tax 111.000.68.542.61.31.00 37.6' 1673147 STREET - SUPPLIES (ORIGINAL IN\ Street - Supplies- 111.000.68.542.61.31.00 -565.0( c 7.7% sales tax sa 111.000.68.542.61.31.00 -43.5- 0 1673148 STREET - SUPPLIES (ORIGINAL IN\ Street - Supplies- a 111.000.68.542.61.31.00 -542.31' 7.7% sales tax 111.000.68.542.61.31.00 -41.7E u 1673149 STREET SUPPLIES (ORIGINAL INV 0 Street Supplies- 111.000.68.542.61.31.00 -275.9( o 7.7% sales tax a 111.000.68.542.61.31.00 -21.2, Q 1673150 STREET - SUPPLIES (ORIGINAL IN\ Street - Supplies- c 111.000.68.542.61.31.00 -488.4< N 7.7% sales tax c 111.000.68.542.61.31.00 -37.6' 1673151 STREET - SUPPLIES (ORIGINAL IN\ Street - Supplies- 111.000.68.542.61.31.00 565.0( +: 7.8% Sales Tax W 111.000.68.542.61.31.00 44.0E E 1673152 STREET - SUPPLIES (ORIGINAL IN\ U �a Q Page: 5 Packet Pg. 32 vchlist 06/20/2019 7:51:40AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 237349 6/20/2019 076240 CADMAN MATERIALS INC Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) Street - Supplies- 111.000.68.542.61.31.00 7.8% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.61.31.00 1673153 STREET SUPPLIES (ORIGINAL INV Street Supplies- 111.000.68.542.61.31.00 7.8% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.61.31.00 1673154 STREET - SUPPLIES (ORIGINAL IN\ Street - Supplies- 111.000.68.542.61.31.00 7.8% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.61.31.00 5604979 ROADWAY - ASPHALT Roadway - Asphalt 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 10.0% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 5605328 ROADWAY - ASPHALT Roadway - Asphalt 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 10.0% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 5605676 ROADWAY - ASPHALT Roadway - Asphalt 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 10.0% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 5606718 ROADWAY - ASPHALT Roadway - Asphalt 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 10.0% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 4.3.a Page: 6 aD L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 a m 542.3< u L 42.3( N m z 275.9( u 21.5, c d c 488.4( 0 38.1( >+ M a E 688.3, .� 68.8' 0 0 0 L 211.0� a Q 21.1- 0 N 549.1 < c 54.9- c 329.2E E t 32.9< L) Q Page: 6 Packet Pg. 33 vchlist 06/20/2019 7:51:40AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 237349 6/20/2019 076240 CADMAN MATERIALS INC 237350 6/20/2019 073029 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) 5607050 ROADWAY - ASPHALT Roadway - Asphalt 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 10.0% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 5607413 ROADWAY - ASPHALT Roadway - Asphalt 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 10.0% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 5608124 ROADWAY - ASPHALT Roadway - Asphalt 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 10.0% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 Total: 20211724 INV 20211724 EDMONDS PD COPY CNTRCT CHG IR6255 6/19 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 B/W METER USE 5/19 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 COPY CNTRCT CHRG IRC5240A 6/1 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 B/W METER USE 5/19 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 COLOR METER USE 5/19 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 CONTRACT CHARGE IRC33251 6/1 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 B/W METER USE 5/2019 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 COLOR METER USE 5/19 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 4.3.a Page: 7 aD L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 a m U 209.4E m 13 20.9E m 689.1 < m c 68.9- M c �a 390.2 - o L 39.0, a 5,390.9, U 0 151.8 0 L 28.3, a Q 160.0( rn 32.8E N to 0 23.5( 60.7( u 7.7z (D E t 155.0E U Q Page: 7 Packet Pg. 34 vchlist 06/20/2019 7:51:40AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 4.3.a Page: 8 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account a� L 3 c �a Amoun y 237350 6/20/2019 073029 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES (Continued) 0 m 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 64.5( u 20211726 C/A 572105 CONTRACT# 3091 /0521 L Finance dept copier contract charge 001.000.31.514.23.45.00 209.6" B&W Meter usage IRC5250 5/1/19 001.000.31.514.23.45.00 21.0, u Color Meter usage IRC5250 5/1/19 - 001.000.31.514.23.45.00 29.8( c 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.31.514.23.45.00 27.Of 20211729 CANON 5250 contract charges June 2019 0 001.000.22.518.10.45.00 167.6� >+ contract charges June 2019 a 001.000.61.557.20.45.00 20.9E contract charges June 2019 0 001.000.21.513.10.45.00 20.9E u bw meter usage May 2019 0 001.000.22.518.10.45.00 11.2z > bw meter usage May 2019 001.000.61.557.20.45.00 1.4- a bw meter usage May 2019 Q 001.000.21.513.10.45.00 1.4( c� clr meter usage May 2019 c 001.000.22.518.10.45.00 115.2( N clr meter usage May 2019 0 001.000.61.557.20.45.00 14.4( clr meter usage May 2019 001.000.21.513.10.45.00 14.4( 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.22.518.10.45.00 30.5 , E 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.61.557.20.45.00 3.8, Q Page: 8 Packet Pg. 35 vchlist 06/20/2019 7:51:40AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 4.3.a Page: 9 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account a� L 3 c �a Amoun y 237350 6/20/2019 073029 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES (Continued) 0 m 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.21.513.10.45.00 3.8< u 20211730 WWTP: 6-2019 MO CHG+ 5-2019 MI L 6-2019 MO CHG+ 5-2019 METER UE 423.000.76.535.80.45.00 155.5£ Y 20211731 CANON 2501F contract charge Jun 2019 001.000.21.513.10.45.00 26.4, bw meter usage May 2019 c 001.000.21.513.10.45.00 2.3 1 clr meter usage May 2019 001.000.21.513.10.45.00 23.1 10.4% Sales Tax o 001.000.21.513.10.45.00 5.3� >+ 20211733 PLANNING PRINTER/COPIER/COPI a Planning printer/copier/copies E 001.000.62.524.10.45.00 44.7< 'Fa 20211737 RECEPTION DESK CITY CLERKS C U ECEPTION DESK CITY CLERKS CO 0 001.000.25.514.30.45.00 30.5E 10.4% Sales Tax o 001.000.25.514.30.45.00 3.1 £ a 20211738 COUNCIL CANON MONTHLY LEASE Q Contract Charge a, 001.000.11.511.60.45.00 26.4z B/W Meter usage c N 001.000.11.511.60.45.00 0.7£ c Color Meter Usage 001.000.11.511.60.45.00 29.6z 10.4% Sales Tax z 001.000.11.511.60.45.00 5.9, 20215748 ENG COPIER JUNE 2019 Eng. Copier June 2019 E 001.000.67.518.21.45.00 602.1( Q Page: 9 Packet Pg. 36 vchlist 06/20/2019 7:51:40AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # 237350 6/20/2019 073029 073029 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES (Continued) 237351 6/20/2019 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY RN05191005 237352 6/20/2019 077134 CHERIE ANDERSEN 237353 6/20/2019 063902 CITY OF EVERETT 237354 6/20/2019 077001 COMMON, LYNNEA DAWN 237355 6/20/2019 006200 DAILY JOURNAL OF COMMERCE 237356 6/20/2019 076013 DAVEY RESOURCE GROUP 237357 6/20/2019 064531 DINES, JEANNIE 3-23300 119001966 JUNE MILEAGE 3348590 83903 19-3938 Description/Account Total : WWTP: 5/31/19 CYLINDER RENTAL 5/31/19 nitrogen, oxygen, carbon 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 Total #40227540-803-CJ2 UTILITY REFUN #40227540-803-CJ2 Utility refund du( 411.000.233.000 Total WATER QUALITY LAB ANALYSYS Water Quality Lab Analysys 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 Total JUNE RANGER CLASSROOM VISIT JUNE RANGER CLASSROOM VISIT 001.000.64.571.23.43.00 Total P&R: WATERFRONT REDEVELOPIV P&R: WATERFRONT REDEVELOPIV 126.000.64.594.76.65.00 Total PROF. SERV.: URBAN FOREST MA Prof. Serv.: Urban Forest Manageme 001.000.62.558.60.41.00 Total 6/11/19 COMMITTEE MIN 6/11/19 PPW COMM- 001.000.25.514.30.41.00 4.3.a Page: 10 aD L 3 c �a Amoun y 0 2,334.25 0 U d L_ 124.0( N 12.9( y 136.9( m c d 242.9< 242.9: 0 L �a 1,652.4( a 1,652.4( E U 4- 0 10.4z > 10.4z a a Q rn LO- 197.4( 197.4( N 0 E 1,505.0( 2 1,505.0( U c aD E t U 325.5( Q Page: 10 Packet Pg. 37 vchlist 06/20/2019 7:51:40AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 4.3.a Page: 11 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account a� L 3 c �a Amoun N 237357 6/20/2019 064531 064531 DINES, JEANNIE (Continued) Total : 0 325.5( 0 237358 6/20/2019 072145 DISTINCTIVE WINDOWS INC 21740-1 Yost Pool YOST POOL- 1/2 OF QUOTE FOR E Yost Pool - 1 /2 of Quote For Door P 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 4,964.4( 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 516.3( Total: 5,480.7( 237359 6/20/2019 076172 DK SYSTEMS 23297 CITY HALL - HEAT PUMPS INSPECT m City Hall - Heat Pumps Inspection 001.000.66.518.30.41.00 315.0( 10.4% Sales Tax �a 001.000.66.518.30.41.00 32.7, _ Total : 347.71 �a 237360 6/20/2019 007253 DUNN LUMBER 6333602 FAC MAINT - WORK WARE a Fac Maint - Work Ware E 001.000.66.518.30.24.00 54.3, 2 10.2% Sales Tax 4- 001.000.66.518.30.24.00 5.5z 0 6350212 PS - SUPPLIES > PS - Supplies 0 a 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 82.0z 10.5% Sales Tax Q -- 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 8.6' r' 6359263 PLAZA RM - SUPPLIES o Plaza Rm - Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 37.6E 10.2% Sales Tax N E 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 3.8E 'R 6405482 PM: SUPPLIES ACCT E000027 PM: SUPPLIES: LUMBER, WOOD F/ 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 85.8( E 10.2% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 U 8.7E Q Page: 11 Packet Pg. 38 vchlist 06/20/2019 7:51:40AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 4.3.a Page: 12 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account a� L 3 c �a Amoun N 237360 6/20/2019 007253 007253 DUNN LUMBER (Continued) Total : 0 286.55 0 237361 6/20/2019 008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION 1-00025 WILLOW CREEK HATCHERY/ METI WILLOW CREEK HATCHERY WATE 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 369.9- 1-00575 OLYMPIC BEACH SPRINKLER / ME- OLYMPIC BEACH SPRINKLER / ME- 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 123.1 f 1-00655 LIFT STATION #7 71 W DAYTON ST LIFT STATION #7 71 W DAYTON ST 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 51.2, 1-00825 BRACKETT'S LANDING RESTROON BRACKETT'S LANDING RESTROON �a 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 1,249.1 E o 1-00875 SPRINKLER 21 MAIN ST/ METER 11 SPRINKLER 21 MAIN ST / METER 11 a 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 55.6' 1-00925 LIFT STATION #8 107 RAILROAD AV LIFT STATION #8 107 RAILROAD AV U 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 51.2, 0 1-01950 LIFT STATION #1 450 SUNSET AVE 7 LIFT STATION #1 450 SUNSET AVE, 0 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 51.2� m 1-02125 SUNSET & CASPER SPRINKLER/ M Q SUNSET & CASPER SPRINKLER/ M 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 51.2, r' 1-03710 SPRINKLER 290 MAIN ST/ METER' N SPRINKLER 290 MAIN ST/ METER' 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 55.6< N 1-03900 SPRINKLER 290 DAYTON ST / METE E SPRINKLER 290 DAYTON ST / METE 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 51.2, 1-03950 OLD PUBLIC WORKS (NORTH) 200 OLD PUBLIC WORKS 200 DAYTON E 421.000.74.534.80.47.00 843.7' u 1-05125 SPRINKLER 101 2ND AVE N / METE +° Q Page: 12 Packet Pg. 39 4.3.a vchlist Voucher List Page: 13 06/20/2019 7:51:40AM City of Edmonds a� L 3 Bank code : usbank c �a Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun y 237361 6/20/2019 008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION (Continued) 0 SPRINKLER 101 2ND AVE N / METE 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 55.6' u 1-05285 SPRINKLER 102 W DAYTON ST / MI L SPRINKLER 102 W DAYTON ST / MI 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 99.7, 1-05340 SPRINKLER 190 DAYTON ST / MET[ SPRINKLER 190 DAYTON ST / MET[ 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 60.0E 1-05350 OLD PUBLIC WORKS (SOUTH) 200 c OLD PUBLIC WORKS (SOUTH) 200 421.000.74.534.80.47.00 109.7z 1-05650 CITY PARK SPRINKLER/ METER 71. sa CITY PARK SPRINKLER/ METER 71. o 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 51.2, 1-05675 CITY PARK MAINTENANCE SHOP / a CITY PARK MAINTENANCE SHOP / E 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 1,011.2z '76 1-05700 SPRINKLER @ 3RD/PINE / METER' SPRINKLER @ 3RD/PINE / METER' o 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 86.5' 1-05705 LIFT STATION #6 100 PINE ST/ MEl o LIFT STATION #6 100 PINE ST / MEl a a 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 108.6� Q 1-09650 SPRINKLER 350 MAIN ST / METER i SPRINKLER 350 MAIN ST / METER i 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 77.7( N 1-09800 SPRINKLER 390 DAYTON ST / MET[ c SPRINKLER 390 DAYTON ST / MET[ ,n 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 51.2, . 1-10778 FOUNTAIN 490 MAIN ST/METER 75' fd U FOUNTAIN 490 MAIN ST/METER 75' }; 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 1,428.3" y 1-10780 SPRINKLER 500 MAIN ST / METER ! E SPRINKLER 500 MAIN ST / METER! U 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 �a 77.7( Q Page: 13 Packet Pg. 40 vchlist 06/20/2019 7:51:40AM Bank code : usbank Voucher List City of Edmonds Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 237361 6/20/2019 008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION (Continued) 1-13975 1-16130 1-16300 1-16420 1-16450 1-16630 1-17475 1-19950 1-36255 237362 6/20/2019 031060 ELECSYS INTERNATIONAL CORP 193866 237363 6/20/2019 075136 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE ASSOC 146376 PO # Description/Account CITY HALL 121 5TH AVE N / METER CITY HALL 121 5TH AVE N / METER 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 SPRINKLER 439 5TH AVE S / METEI SPRINKLER 439 5TH AVE S / METEI 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 SPRINKLER 500 DAYTON ST / MET[ SPRINKLER 500 DAYTON ST / MET[ 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 LOG CABIN SPRINKLER / METER 6' LOG CABIN SPRINKLER / METER 6'' 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 CENTENNIAL PLAZA SPRINKLER 1 CENTENNIAL PLAZA SPRINKLER 1 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 SPRINKLER 575 MAIN ST / METER SPRINKLER 575 MAIN ST / METER 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 SPRINKLER 590 DAYTON ST / MET[ SPRINKLER 590 DAYTON ST / METE 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 PINE STREET PLAYFIELD / METER PINE STREET PLAYFIELD / METER 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 SPRINKLER 1141 9TH AVE S / METE SPRINKLER 1141 9TH AVE S / METE 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 Total RADIX MONTHLY MAINTAGREEME Radix Monthly Maint Agreement - 421.000.74.534.80.48.00 Total PROF SERV: ESA - CLIMATE GOAL 4.3.a Page: 14 aD L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 a m U m 835.5� N 113.0" v 135.0E c aD M 51.2, 0 L 153.3E a E 139.5( u 4- 0 �a 157.1E o a a Q 101.4E 0 N 51.2, c 7,90817 E 2 U 152.0( 152.0( E t U �a Q Page: 14 Packet Pg. 41 vchlist 06/20/2019 7:51:40AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 237363 6/20/2019 075136 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE ASSOC (Continued) 237364 237365 237366 237367 6/20/2019 009350 EVERETT DAILY HERALD 6/20/2019 065427 FCS GROUP EDH859580 EDH860044 EDH860195 2964-21905038 6/20/2019 062193 FIELD INSTRUMENTS & CONTROLS 170810 6/20/2019 065023 FLUKE ELECTRONICS 39797916 PO # Description/Account Prof Serv: ESA - Climate Goals & 001.000.62.524.10.41.00 Total LEGAL DESCRIP: PLN 2019 0021 R Legal Descrip: PLN 2019 0021 Remi 001.000.62.558.60.41.00 INV EDH860044 ACCT 14126500 El UNCLAIMED PROPERTY AD -HERA 001.000.41.521.10.41.40 CITY ORDINANCE CITY ORDINANCE 4151 001.000.25.514.30.41.40 Total EBJB.SERVICES THRU 5/17/19 EBJB.Services thru 5/17/19 421.000.74.534.80.41.10 EBJB.Services thru 5/17/19 422.000.72.531.90.41.20 EBJB.Services thru 5/17/19 423.000.75.535.80.41.30 Total WWTP: PRECISION DIGITAL PROVI PRECISION DIGITAL PROVU PROC 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 Freight 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 10.4% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 Total WWTP: INSULATION MULTIMETER INSULATION MULTIMETER CALIBR) 4.3.a Page: 15 a� L 3 c �a Amoun y 0 a m 4,178.0z u 4,178.0' �a N m 59.7' m c 21.7, (D c �a 25.3z o 106.7< �a a E 5,704.4E 0 5,704.4E 0 5,704.4E a 17,113.3, Q rn 0 888.0( 0 28.3E E M 95.3( 1,011.6E c W E t v �a Q Page: 15 Packet Pg. 42 vchlist 06/20/2019 7:51:40AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 237367 6/20/2019 065023 FLUKE ELECTRONICS 237368 6/20/2019 011900 FRONTIER Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 REPAIR MULTIMETER 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 10.4% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 Tota I : 253-011-1177 PUBLIC WORKS OMC RADIO LINE PUBLIC WORKS OMC RADIO LINE 001.000.65.518.20.42.00 PUBLIC WORKS OMC RADIO LINE 111.000.68.542.90.42.00 PUBLIC WORKS OMC RADIO LINE 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 PUBLIC WORKS OMC RADIO LINE 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 PUBLIC WORKS OMC RADIO LINE 511.000.77.548.68.42.00 PUBLIC WORKS OMC RADIO LINE 422.000.72.531.90.42.00 425-712-0417 TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 425-712-8251 PUBLIC WORKS OMC ALARM, FAX, PUBLIC WORKS OMC FIRE AND IN' 001.000.65.518.20.42.00 PUBLIC WORKS OMC FIRE AND IN' 111.000.68.542.90.42.00 PUBLIC WORKS OMC FIRE AND IN' 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 PUBLIC WORKS OMC FIRE AND IN' 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 4.3.a Page: 16 a� L 3 c �a Amoun y 0 a aD 213.0( 'D r U d 168.0( 17.4, Y 398.4, m c 6.4' 24.4< 0 24.4< �a a 24.4< 24.4' u 0 24.4' 0 L a a 35.7z Q rn 35.7< c N 0 17.0E 85.2 71.6' (D E t 71.6< U Q Page: 16 Packet Pg. 43 vchlist 06/20/2019 7:51:40AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 237368 6/20/2019 011900 FRONTIER Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) PUBLIC WORKS CIVIC FIRE AND IN' 511.000.77.548.68.42.00 425-745-4313 CLUBHOUSE ALARM LINES 6801 M CLUBHOUSE FIRE AND INTRUSION 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 425-775-1344 425-775-1344 RANGER STATION 425-775-1344 RANGER STATION 001.000.64.571.23.42.00 425-775-2455 CIVIC CENTER ALARM LINES 250 5 CIVIC CENTER FIRE AND INTRUSIC 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 425-775-7865 UTILITY BILLING RADIO LINE UTILITY BILLING RADIO LINE TO FI 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 Total: 237369 6/20/2019 069571 GOBLE SAMPSON ASSOCIATES INC BINV0007693 237370 6/20/2019 074722 GUARDIAN SECURITY SYSTEMS 237371 6/20/2019 076333 HASA INC WWTP: WATM01 WATM01 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 Freight 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 10.4% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 Total : 915182 OLD PW - SECURITY OLD PW - SECURITY 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 Total 642160 WWTP: SOD. HYPOCHLORITE SOD. HYPOCHLORITE 423.000.76.535.80.31.53 4.3.a Page: 17 a� L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 a m 95.5( u L_ 138.& m 70.9( m c a� 68.5, �a 0 71.3( `>, 890.E< a E U 1,107.0( o Ta 26.3< o L a a 117.8, Q 1,251.2( 0 N to 55.0( N E 5.7< 2 60.7: c aD E t 1,980.3( ;a Q Page: 17 Packet Pg. 44 vchlist 06/20/2019 7:51:40AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 237371 6/20/2019 076333 HASA INC (Continued) 237372 6/20/2019 065764 HASNER, THOMAS W 47 237373 6/20/2019 072647 HERRERA ENVIRONMENTAL 44577 237374 6/20/2019 061013 HONEY BUCKET 0551100299 0551108095 0551108096 0551108097 0551108098 0551108099 0551108100 PO # Description/Account 10.4% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.53 REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT 009.000.39.517.20.23.00 Total : Total ; EDMONDS WATERFRONT REDEVE EDMONDS WATERFRONT REDEVE 001.000.64.571.21.41.00 EDMONDS WATERFRONT REDEVE 125.000.64.594.76.65.41 Total CIVIC FIELD 6TH & EDMONDS HON CIVIC FIELD 6TH & EDMONDS HON 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 HICKMAN PARK HONEY BUCKET HICKMAN PARK HONEY BUCKET 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 YOST PARK POOL HONEY BUCKET YOST PARK POOL HONEY BUCKET 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 HAINES WHARF PARK HONEY BUC HAINES WHARF PARK HONEY BUC 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 PINE STREET PARK HONEY BUCKE PINE STREET PARK HONEY BUCKE 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 SIERRA PARK HONEY BUCKET SIERRA PARK HONEY BUCKET 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 WILLOW CREEK FISH HATCHERY I 4.3.a Page: 18 aD L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 a m 205.9E u 2,186.2° -a N m 224.0' v 224.W m c a� 4,077.3-, 840.2E 4,917.6! a E U -24.4( o Ta 607.6, a a Q 309.2- r' 0 N 233.7E o E M 113.8E c aD E 113.8E �a Q Page: 18 Packet Pg. 45 vchlist 06/20/2019 7:51:40AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 237374 6/20/2019 061013 HONEY BUCKET (Continued) 0551108101 0551108102 0551108103 237375 6/20/2019 060165 HWA GEOSCIENCES INC 29338 237376 6/20/2019 076993 INDIGENOUZ PLACEMAKERZ MUSIC AT LIBRARY 237377 6/20/2019 014940 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS 300-10055786 300-10056330 300-10058405 PO # Description/Account WILLOW CREEK FISH HATCHERY I 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 CIVIC FIELD 6TH & BELL HONEY Bl CIVIC FIELD 6TH & BELL HONEY Bl 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 MARINA BEACH/DOG PARK HONED MARINA BEACH/DOG PARK HONEI 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 CIVIC CENTER PLAYFIELD HONEY CIVIC CENTER PLAYFIELD HONEY 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 Total E8FC.SERVICES THRU 5/25/19 E8FC.Services thru 5/25/19 422.000.72.594.31.65.41 Total EAC: MUSIC AT LIBRARY: CONTRA, EAC: MUSIC AT LIBRARY: CONTRA, 117.100.64.573.20.41.00 Total WATER - WORK WEAR Water - Work Wear 421.000.74.534.80.24.00 10.4% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.24.00 WATER - WORK WEAR Water - Work Wear 421.000.74.534.80.24.00 10.4% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.24.00 FLEET SHOP SUPPLIES Fleet Shop Supplies 4.3.a Page: 19 a� L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 a m 215.0E u 113.8E m 1,394.2' m c d M 113.8E 3,190.8< sa 0 �a a 202.5( 202.5( 0 �a 600.0( o 600.0( a a Q rn 79.9( o N 8.3- o E M 39.9E c 4.1E E t U �a Q Page: 19 Packet Pg. 46 vchlist 06/20/2019 7:51:40AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 237377 6/20/2019 014940 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS (Continued) 237378 6/20/2019 070250 IRON MOUNTAIN 201901075 237379 6/20/2019 068816 JOHNSON CONTROLS FIRE PROT LP 85918308 237380 6/20/2019 075279 JOHNSON, RONALD 5/3-7/30 SR SB UMP 237381 6/20/2019 063493 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY 13142525-00 237382 6/20/2019 068401 KING CO OFFICE OF FINANCE PO # Description/Account 511.000.77.548.68.31.20 10.4% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.20 Total : 05-19 OFF SITE DATA STORAGE SE May-2019 Off site data storage servic 512.000.31.518.88.41.00 Total WWTP: 5-YR OBSTRUCTION & INTI 5-YR OBSTRUCTION & INTERNAL II 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 10.4% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 Total 5/3-7/30/16 SENIOR SOFTBALL UMI 5/3-7/30/16 SENIOR SOFTBALL UMI 001.000.64.571.25.41.00 Total PM: YOST POOL POWER VENTER, PM: YOST POOL POWER VENTER, 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 10.0% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 PM: CREDIT FOR RETURNED ITEM PM: CREDIT FOR RETURNED ITEM 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 Total WLRD WRIA8-AWARD 114450 4.3.a Page: 20 a� L 3 c �a Amoun y 0 a aD 39.8( 'D r U d 4.1� L 176.2° N Y V m z U 267.2( 267.2( c c �a 930.0( — 0 96.7, a 1,026.7: U 4- 200.0( o 200.0( 0 Q a Q 931.7E c� 0 93.1 N 0 0 -267.7E -27.8z 729.3F E t U co Q Page: 20 Packet Pg. 47 vchlist 06/20/2019 7:51:40AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 4.3.a Page: 21 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 237382 6/20/2019 068401 KING CO OFFICE OF FINANCE (Continued) WLRD WRIA8-Award 114450 422.000.72.531.90.41.50 14,282.0( Total: 14,282.0( 237383 6/20/2019 073603 LIGHTHOUSE LAW GROUP PLLC Jun-19 06-19 LEGALS FEES 06-19 Legal fees 001.000.36.515.31.41.00 47,964.0( Total : 47,964.0( 237384 6/20/2019 018980 LYNNWOOD HONDA 5009415 PM: SUPPLIES: BLADE HOLDER, BI PM: SUPPLIES: BLADE HOLDER, BI 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 45.4( 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 4.7, Total : 50.1: 237385 6/20/2019 075716 MALLORY PAINT STORE INC E0108172 BEACH RANGER FISHING PIER - S1 Beach Ranger Fishing Pier - Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 72.9( Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 7.2� E0109114 FS 17 - SUPPLIES FS 17 - Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 78.0, Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 7.8( Tota I : 166.0' 237386 6/20/2019 019582 MANOR HARDWARE 975587-00 FAC - SUPPLIES FAC - Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 148.8� 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 15.6' Total : 164.5: Page: 21 Packet Pg. 48 vchlist 06/20/2019 7:51:40AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 4.3.a Page: 22 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 237387 6/20/2019 068670 MARSHBANK CONSTRUCTION INC E1CA.Pmt 19 ElCA.PMT 1 THRU 6/1/19 E1CA.Pmt 1 thru 6/1/19 112.000.68.595.33.65.00 14,069.71 Tota I : 14,069.7 , 237388 6/20/2019 019920 MCCANN, MARIAN 46 REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT 009.000.39.517.20.29.00 8,349.5( Total : 8,349.5( 237389 6/20/2019 020039 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO 97172260 WWTP: PLIERS & SORBENT FOR C PLIERS & SORBENT FOR OIL 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 123.6E Freight 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 23.6� 10.4% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 15.3, Total : 162.6E 237390 6/20/2019 069053 MICRO COM SYSTEMS LTD 17339 SCANNING FOR BUILDING Scanning for Building 001.000.62.524.10.41.00 905.2z Total : 905.2z 237391 6/20/2019 020900 MILLERS EQUIP & RENT ALL INC 304525 STREET - TRIMMER SUPPLIES Street - Trimmer Supplies 111.000.68.542.71.31.00 32.9� 10.4% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.71.31.00 3.4< 305524 STREET - SUPPLIES Street - Supplies 111.000.68.542.71.31.00 54.1 , 10.4% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.71.31.00 5.6' Total : 96.1 j Page: 22 Packet Pg. 49 vchlist 06/20/2019 7:51:40AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 237392 6/20/2019 075590 MOBILE GUARD 237393 6/20/2019 072746 MURRAYSMITH INC 237394 6/20/2019 025690 NOYES, KARIN 237395 6/20/2019 065720 OFFICE DEPOT 237396 6/20/2019 027060 PACIFIC TOPSOILS Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account INVO0510287 NETGUARD ANNUAL SERVICE 5/1/ NetGuard Annual Service 5/01/19 - 512.000.31.518.88.42.00 Total 15-1715-43 ESKA.SERVICES THRU 5/31/19 ESKA.Services thru 5/31/19 421.000.74.594.34.65.41 Total 000 00 918 ADB MINUTES JUNE 5, 2019 ADB Minutes June 5, 2019 001.000.62.558.60.41.00 Total 315075336001 PW - OFFICE SUPPLIES PW - Office Supplies 001.000.65.518.20.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.65.518.20.31.00 325406129001 INV 325406123001 ACCT 90520437 BLUE COPY PAPER 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 PAPER FASTENER BASES 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 SILVER SHARPIE PENS 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 FINE BLACK SHARPIE PENS 001.000.41.521.70.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.70.31.00 Total 2-01050079-01 PM: TOPSOIL 3 WAY, COMPLIANCE 4.3.a Page: 23 a� L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 a m 10,668.0( u 10,668.0( N m 8,733.9E 8,733.9E m c a� 296.0( 296.0( — 0 L �a a 34.5E .E �a U 3.5� o �a 25.1 f a a 2.2E Q rn 18.8� o N to 8.7< o E 4.8, .m 0.9" c 98.9j E t U co Q Page: 23 Packet Pg. 50 vchlist 06/20/2019 7:51:40AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 237396 6/20/2019 027060 PACIFIC TOPSOILS (Continued) 237397 6/20/2019 065051 PARAMETRIX INC 10013 237398 6/20/2019 027450 PAWS J U N E 2019 237399 6/20/2019 073871 PERSONNEL EVALUATION INC 32576 237400 6/20/2019 074793 PETDATA INC 7708 237401 6/20/2019 062296 PETTY CASH PC2019-1 PO # Description/Account PM: TOPSOIL 3 WAY, COMPLIANCE 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 Total ESDB.SERVICES THRU 5/4/19 ESDB.Services thru 5/4/19 112.000.68.595.33.65.41 Total ANIMAL SHELTERING JUNE 2019 - 7 ANIMALS AT $200 -$100 RECLAIM 001.000.41.521.70.41.00 Total INV32576 EDMONDS PD - MAY 201 � 6 WEB -BASED PEP TESTS @ $20/E 001.000.41.521.10.41.00 Total INV 7708 EDMONDS PD - MAY PET 30 PET LICENSE @ $4.20 EA 001.000.41.521.70.41.00 REPLACEMENT TAG 2 @ $4.20 EA 001.000.41.521.70.41.00 2 LATE FEES @ $2.50 EA 001.000.41.521.70.41.00 Total WWTP: PETTY CASH DIST 1/1-6/17, Ace Hardware: 1/24 & 6/11/19 Ice for 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 Certified Mail Postage for NPDES Pei 423.000.76.535.80.42.00 4.3.a Page: 24 aD L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 a m 410.0( u L 42.6z 452.6z m v 30,690.9E 30,690.9F c �a 1,300.0( 1,300.0( a E U 120.0( o 120.0( 0 a a 126.0( Q rn 8.4( c N 5.0( c 139.4( U 9.9E (D E t 8.9E L) Q Page: 24 Packet Pg. 51 vchlist 06/20/2019 7:51:40AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 237401 6/20/2019 062296 PETTY CASH 237402 6/20/2019 028860 PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) Home Depot 5/24/19 Shop Vak for 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 Tota I : V076476 HAZEL MILLER - SUPPLIES Hazel Miller - Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 V305785 WWTP: HOF Al 086CHORFG HOF A1086CHORFG 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 10.4% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 V342134 PLAZA ROOM - SUPPLIES Plaza Room - Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 237403 6/20/2019 071811 PONY MAIL BOX & BUSINESS CTR 1115583 237404 6/20/2019 068697 PUBLIC SAFETY TESTING INC 237405 6/20/2019 071702 RAILROAD MGMT CO III LLC Total ; WATER QUALITY - ANNUAL WATEF Water Quality -Annual Water Analys 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 Total 2019-0098 SUBSCRIPTION FEES Q1 01 JAN-MARCH 2O19 SUBSCRIPTI( 001.000.22.521.10.41.00 Total 392299 ANNUAL LEASE FOR LIC AGREEME Annual Lease for Lic Agreement #301� 423.000.75.535.80.45.00 397325 ANNUAL LICENSE FEES #305234 N 4.3.a Page: 25 aD L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 a m 197.4E u 216.3 , •`— N m 277.4, 28.8E a� 101.8E 0 10.6( �a a 306.1 £ U 31.8, o 75617 0 0 L a a Q 361.9E v 361.9E r' 0 N to 0 786.0( E 786.0( 'M c 863.01 t U �a Q Page: 25 Packet Pg. 52 vchlist 06/20/2019 7:51:40AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 237405 6/20/2019 071702 RAILROAD MGMT CO III LLC Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice (Continued) 237406 6/20/2019 076687 REBUILD -IT SERVICES GROUP LLC 10833 237407 6/20/2019 076493 BEDSIDE CONSTRUCTION LLC E5KA.Pmt 14 237408 6/20/2019 066786 RELIABLE SECURITY SOUND & DATA 23005 237409 6/20/2019 075601 RUSHWORKS 237410 6/20/2019 077135 RYAN & SARA PETERSON 237411 6/20/2019 067802 SAN DIEGO POLICE EQUIP CO EDMON042419 3-00325 637906 PO # Description/Account Annual License Fees #305234 Mead 422.000.72.531.90.45.00 Total WWTP: REBUILD EIMCO C40LT DR LABOR SERVICES 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 REBUILD EIMCO C40LT DRIVE 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 10.4% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 Total E5KA.PMT 14 THRU 5/31/19 E5KA.Pmt 14 thru 5/31/19 421.000.74.594.34.65.10 Total INDIGO ULTRA SUPPORT RENEWA Indigo Ultra Support Renewal 512.000.31.518.88.48.00 10.4% Sales Tax 512.000.31.518.88.48.00 Total A -LIST BROADCAST 1-CH AUTOMA A -LIST Broadcast 1-CH Automation 512.000.31.518.88.48.00 Total #611206564-KK UTILITY REFUND #611206564-KK Utility refund due to 411.000.233.000 Total INV 637906 CUST 1733 EDMONDS I 4.3.a Page: 26 W L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 a m 235.4- u 1,098.4E N m 35,627.0( r 23,630.0( 2,457.5, 61,714.5, 0 �a a 127,515.9E 127,515.9E •� 0 �a 342.7, o a 35.6, 378.3E Q rn 0 N 5,171.0( c 5,171.0( E 2 U 202.8£ (D 202.8E E U �a Q Page: 26 Packet Pg. 53 4.3.a vchlist Voucher List Page: 27 06/20/2019 7:51:40AM City of Edmonds Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account a� L 3 c �a Amoun y 237411 6/20/2019 067802 SAN DIEGO POLICE EQUIP CO (Continued) 0 m 9MM AMMO 001.000.41.521.23.31.00 1,470.2f u 10.4% Sales Tax L 001.000.41.521.23.31.00 152.9" 637965 INV 637965 CUST 1733 EDMONDS I 8 CASE 9MM AMMO 001.000.41.521.23.31.00 t 1,473.5, u 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.23.31.00 .E 153.2c Total : 3,249.9E M 237412 6/20/2019 072733 SCHWING BIOSET INC 61422048 WWTP: RAM FLANGE STYLE RAM FLANGE STYLE o 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 286.3, j, Freight a 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 387.1 , Total : 673.41 237413 6/20/2019 068132 SHORELINE CONSTRUCTION CO ESJB.Pmt 1 ESJB.PMT 1 THRU 5/31/19 c ESJB.Pmt 1 thru 5/31/19 7a 421.000.74.594.34.65.10 13,248.0( p ESJB.Pmt 1 thru 5/31/19 a 423.000.75.594.35.65.30 202,846.5< Q Total : 216,094.5: 237414 6/20/2019 036850 SMITH, SHERLUND D 48 REIMBURSEMENT o REIMBURSEMENT N 009.000.39.517.20.23.00 31397.5, c Total: 3,397.5, E .ii 237415 6/20/2019 060889 SNAP -ON INDUSTRIAL ARV/ 39990349 TRAFFIC - SUPPLIES U Traffic - Supplies 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 114.8E E 10.4% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 11.9z M Q Page: 27 Packet Pg. 54 vchlist 06/20/2019 7:51:40AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 237415 6/20/2019 060889 060889 SNAP -ON INDUSTRIAL 237416 6/20/2019 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) Total 200202554 WWTP: 5/4-6/4/19 FLOWMETER 101 5/4-6/4/19 FLOW METER 2400 HIGF 423.000.76.535.80.47.62 200260271 YOST POOL YOST POOL 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 200398956 FIRE STATION #16 8429 196TH ST ; FIRE STATION #16 8429 196TH ST 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 200496834 LIFT STATION #10 17526 TALBOT R LIFT STATION #10 17526 TALBOT R 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 200611317 LIFT STATION #9 19300 80TH AVE V LIFT STATION #9 19300 80TH AVE V 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 200650851 CITY PARK RESTROOMS CITY PARK RESTROOMS 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 200651644 PARK MAINTENANCE SHOP PARK MAINTENANCE SHOP 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 200723021 TRAFFIC LIGHT 961 PUGET DR / MI TRAFFIC LIGHT 961 PUGET DR / MI 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 201184538 HICKMAN PARK HICKMAN PARK 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 201383270 CITY PARK GAZEBO CITY PARK GAZEBO 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 201431236 PEDEST CAUTION LIGHT 9110 OILY PEDEST CAUTION LIGHT 9110 OILY 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 201431244 PEDEST CAUTION LIGHT 9301 PUC 4.3.a Page: 28 aD L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 126.8( 0 U d L_ 18.3, N m 1,438.4- v m c 894.1 < � c �a 66.2( o �a a 131.1� U 17.2, 0 �a 0 498.5' a a Q 28.3z 0 N 23.2, N E 17.1; c a� E 17.1; u �a Q Page: 28 Packet Pg. 55 vchlist 06/20/2019 7:51:40AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 237416 6/20/2019 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) PEDEST CAUTION LIGHT 9301 PUC 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 201441755 TRAFFIC LIGHT 21531 HWY 99 / ME TRAFFIC LIGHT 21531 HWY 99 / ME 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 201453057 CIVIC CENTER PLAYFIELD LIGHTS CIVIC CENTER PLAYFIELD LIGHTS 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 202114484 CITY PARK S RESTROOMS & SHEL CITY PARK S RESTROOMS & SHEL 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 202250627 9TH/GASPER LANDSCAPED BED 9TH/GASPER LANDSCAPED BED 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 202289450 TRAFFIC LIGHT 21931 HWY 99 / ME TRAFFIC LIGHT 21931 HWY 99 / ME 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 202540647 SIERRA PARK IRRIGATION 8100 191 SIERRA PARK IRRIGATION 8100 191 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 203652151 FIVE CORNERS RESERVOIR 85191 FIVE CORNERS RESERVOIR 85191 421.000.74.534.80.47.00 204425847 LIFT STATION #2 702 MELODY LN / LIFT STATION #2 702 MELODY LN / 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 205184385 LIFT STATION #5 432 3RD AVE S / fV LIFT STATION #5 432 3RD AVE S / fV 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 220216386 PEDEST CAUTION LIGHTS 8410 MF PEDEST CAUTION LIGHTS 8410 MF 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 220547574 TRAFFIC LIGHT SR104 @ 236TH Sl TRAFFIC LIGHT SR104 @ 236TH Sl 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 4.3.a Page: 29 a� L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 a m 16.6( u 167.6( m t U 63.7.E 45 m c a� 58.7, �a 0 18.8� `>, M a E 77.3E 'ij U 4- 0 16.6( 0 L Q a 227.2( Q rn 62.7 N to 0 23.11 .E ca U 60.1 £ y E t U �a 67.6E Q Page: 29 Packet Pg. 56 vchlist 06/20/2019 7:51:40AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 4.3.a Page: 30 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 237416 6/20/2019 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 (Continued) 221732084 VETERANS PLAZA METER 1000597 VETERANS PLAZA METER 1000597 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 111.9 Total : 4,121% 237417 6/20/2019 006630 SNOHOMISH COUNTY 74941 PARKS MAINT 5005 DUMP FEES PARKS MAINT DUMP FEES 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 978.0( DUMP FEES - PUBLIC WORKS 422.000.72.531.10.49.00 53.0( Tota I : 1,031.0( 237418 6/20/2019 038300 SOUND DISPOSAL CO 104757 WWTP: 5-2019 ROLLOFF ASH DISI 5-2019 Ash disposal & taxes 423.000.76.535.80.47.65 2,609.9E Total : 2,609.9E 237419 6/20/2019 068439 SPECIALTY DOOR SERVICE 51943 FS 20 - DOOR REPAIRS FS 20 - Door Repairs 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 1,481.4E 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 154.0 , Total : 1,635.5: 237420 6/20/2019 074568 SPROUT DESIGN 1304 WOTS BROCHURE & POSTER DES WOTS BROCHURE & POSTER DES 123.000.64.573.20.41.00 1,200.0( Tota I : 1,200.0( 237421 6/20/2019 040430 STONEWAY ELECTRIC SUPPLY S102771281.001 FAC MAINT - SUPPLIES Fac Maint - Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 626.2.E 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 65.7E Total: 692.01 Page: 30 Packet Pg. 57 vchlist 06/20/2019 7:51:40AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 237422 6/20/2019 068360 SUMMIT LAW GROUP 237423 6/20/2019 072790 TCC PRINTING & IMAGING 237424 6/20/2019 027269 THE PART WORKS INC 237425 6/20/2019 075587 THE UPS STORE #6392 Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account 102707 REIMBURSEMENT FOR EXPENSES Delivery service/messengers & Trial 001.000.36.515.32.41.00 Total 1715 EAC: WOTS BROCHURE EAC: WOTS BROCHURE 123.000.64.573.20.49.00 10.4% Sales Tax 123.000.64.573.20.49.00 1721 EAC: WOTS POSTER EAC: WOTS POSTER 123.000.64.573.20.49.00 10.4% Sales Tax 123.000.64.573.20.49.00 Total INV43052 PS - SUPPLIES PS - Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 Freight 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 INV43162 FAC MAINT - SUPPLIES Fac Maint - Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 Freight 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 Tota I : 0000029 WWTP: 4/10/19 SHIP CHG 4/10/19 Ship Charges $15.21 that ha( 423.000.76.535.80.42.00 4.3.a Page: 31 a� L 3 c �a Amoun y 0 a m 671.5( u 671.5( .L N m 1,193.8, 124.1E a� 136.2E 0 14.1, 1,468.4: a E U 226.3, c �a 8.3( p L a 24.4( Q rn 176.5, N 8.3( N E 19.2, 2 463.0E c a� E t 13.6E Q Page: 31 Packet Pg. 58 vchlist 06/20/2019 7:51:40AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 4.3.a Page: 32 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 237425 6/20/2019 075587 075587 THE UPS STORE #6392 (Continued) Total : 13.65 237426 6/20/2019 068105 THORSON BARNETT & MCDONALD PC 82145 MEBT SERVICES MEBT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 001.000.22.518.10.41.00 68.0( Total : 68.0( 237427 6/20/2019 077070 UNITED RECYCLING & CONTAINER 78042 STORM - DUMP FEES Storm - Dump Fees 422.000.72.531.10.49.00 216.5( Total: 216.5( 237428 6/20/2019 076234 WASHINGTON TREE & LAWN CARE 1249127 PM: TREE SPRAYING 6TH & BELL PM: TREE SPRAYING DOWNTOWN 001.000.64.576.80.41.00 260.0( 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.41.00 27.0z Tota I : 287.0z 237429 6/20/2019 067195 WASHINGTON TREE EXPERTS 119-380 STREET - 18824 81 ST AVE W CEDA Street - 18824 81 st Ave W Cedar tree 111.000.68.542.71.48.00 750.0( 10.4% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.71.48.00 78.0( Tota I : 828.0( 237430 6/20/2019 075635 WCP SOLUTIONS 11214379 FAC MAINT - SUPPLIES Fac Maint - Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 85.4( 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 8.8£ 11214380 FAC MAINT - TT SUPPLIES Fac Maint - TT Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 339.0E 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 35.2E 11230276 FAC MAINT SUPPLIES Page: 32 Packet Pg. 59 vchlist 06/20/2019 7:51:40AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 4.3.a Page: 33 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account a� L 3 c �a Amoun y 237430 6/20/2019 075635 WCP SOLUTIONS (Continued) 0 m Fac Maint Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 187.0( u 10.4% Sales Tax L 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 19.4E 11232486 FAC MAINT - SUPPLIES Y Fac Maint - Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 737.6( u 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 76.7- c 11232488 FAC - SUPPLIES FAC - Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 474.9( 10.4% Sales Tax o 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 49.3� >% 11234717 FAC - SUPPLIES a FAC - Supplies E 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 147.2( .i 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 15.3- 0 11237122 FAC MAINT - SUPPLIES > Fac Maint - Supplies 0 L 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 224.0( a 10.4% Sales Tax Q 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 23.3( rn Total: 2,423.4E c N 237431 6/20/2019 073552 WELCO SALES LLC 7666 #10 WINDOW ENVELOPES FOR FII co #10 Window envelopes for Finance - 0 001.000.31.514.23.31.00 369.0( . 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.31.514.23.31.00 38.3E }; Total: 407.3f a0i E 237432 6/20/2019 075926 WESTERN EXTERMINATOR 2048750 PS - BIMONTHLY SVC U PS - BiMonthly Svc Q Page: 33 Packet Pg. 60 vchlist 06/20/2019 7:51:40AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 4.3.a Page: 34 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 237432 6/20/2019 075926 WESTERN EXTERMINATOR (Continued) 001.000.66.518.30.41.00 99.0( 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.41.00 10.3( Total: 109.3( 237433 6/20/2019 069691 WESTERN SYSTEMS 0000038860 TRAFFIC - SUPPLIES Traffic - Supplies 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 800.0( Freight 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 21.8E 10.4% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 85.4, Total: 907.3( 237434 6/20/2019 077047 WESTSIDE CONCRETE ACCESSORIES 1286107-IN STREET - SUPPLIES Street - Supplies 111.000.68.542.61.31.00 59.7.E 10.4% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.61.31.00 6.2E Tota I : 65.9E 237435 6/20/2019 076625 WINDWARD ENVIRONMENTAL LLC 16560-16563 WINDWARD APRIL'19 FOUR INVOI Tasks 1,3, and 4 baseline study and 001.000.11.511.60.41.00 23,208.7E Total : 23,208.7E 237436 6/20/2019 075122 YAKIMA CO DEPT OF CORR JUNE 10, 2019 JUNE 10, 2019 EDMONDS PD - MAY 4 DAYS INMATE HOUSING @a $63.6! 001.000.39.523.60.41.50 254.6( INMATE MEDS - APRIL 2019 001.000.39.523.60.31.00 48.1E Total : 302.71 237437 6/20/2019 051282 ZUMAR INDUSTRIES INC 27679 TRAFFIC - SUPPLIES Traffic - Supplies Page: 34 Packet Pg. 61 vchlist 06/20/2019 7:51:40AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 237437 6/20/2019 051282 ZUMAR INDUSTRIES INC 97 Vouchers for bank code : usbank 97 Vouchers in this report Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 Total Bank total Total vouchers 4.3.a Page: 35 W L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 a aD 105.0( '0 r U d 10.9< .L 115.9: N 873,305.5! t U 873,305.5° LP m c d c �a 0 L Q U 4- 0 0 L Q Q Q r O N O O N E 2 V a 4) E t V f6 Q Page: 35 Packet Pg. 62 4.3.b vchlist 06/20/2019 11:13:28AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 6202019 6/20/2019 062693 US BANK Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account 0091 MAY VISA - EW JOB POSTING SUBSCRIPTION - CA 001.000.22.518.10.41.40 JOB POSTING SUBSCRIPTION - BA 001.000.22.518.10.41.40 JOB POSTING - HR DIR - IPMA 001.000.22.518.10.41.40 JOB POSTINGS - AWC 001.000.22.518.10.41.40 AMAZON - INADVERTENT CHARGE 001.000.22.518.10.49.00 0747 COVOCH-WILLIAMS - UNIT 66 SUPI Covoch-Williams - Unit 66 Supplies 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 Amazon - Otterbox City Cell Phone C 001.000.65.518.20.31.00 Amazon - PW Supplies 001.000.65.518.20.31.00 PayPal - NWWA-AWWA- Training Cc 421.000.74.534.80.49.00 Costco - Supplies 001.000.65.518.20.31.00 Amazon - PW - EOC Supplies 001.000.65.518.20.31.00 Amazon - PW - Office Supplies 001.000.65.518.20.31.00 Amazon - PW Office Supplies 001.000.65.518.20.31.00 1937 THE TRUCK SHOP - UNIT 98 PARTr The Truck Shop - Unit 98 Parts and 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 Amazon - City Cell Phone Case 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 WA DOL Lic Fees - Unit E166EO Page: 1 m L 3 c ea Amoun 00 a 0 0 12.9E m =a 50.0( Y m 300.0( u 350.0( aD 14.6E c �a 13.9-, �a 0_ 16.5( E .ii 61.8" U 4- 0 220.0( 0 L 351.7, 0- Q 401.9E rn 12.6E N W 0 81.6E 3 52.9E E 30.8E �a Q Page: 1 Packet Pg. 63 vchlist 06/20/2019 11:13:28AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 6202019 6/20/2019 062693 US BANK Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 Nebar Hose - Unit M16 - Exhaust Ho: 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 Good To Go - City Vehicle Toll Fees 511.000.77.548.68.49.00 AMSOil - Fleet Shop Greese 511.000.77.548.68.31.20 Integrity Machines - Unit M16 - Repai 511.000.77.548.68.48.00 Mitchelll - Fleet Software 511.000.77.548.68.49.00 The Truck Shop - Parts 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 Diamond Mowers - Unit 19 - Parts 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 Good To Go - Unit 891 Useage 511.000.77.548.68.49.00 State Of WA - Underground Storage 511.000.77.548.68.49.00 Home Depot - Unit 19 - Parts 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 PayPal - Unit 960 Parts 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 PayPal - Unit M16 - Parts 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 Fisheries - Units El61,162,163EQ - F 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 Home Depot - Fleet Shop Supplies 511.000.77.548.68.31.20 Amazon - Fleet Shop Supplies 511.000.77.548.68.31.20 Diamond Mower - Parts 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 Factory Outlet Store - Unit M16 - Part 4.3.b Page: 2 m L 3 c Amoun .y 0 a 37.2E 194.5� =a 2.7E ui Y m 6.4� 976.6( m c a� 1,907.7- c �a 12.5E o 244.8, a 12.0( •� U 545.7 o R 15.2• o L a 58.6E Q rn 20.2E 0 N 143.2( co 0 m 24.0( 3 128.1( E 174.4- �a a Page: 2 Packet Pg. 64 vchlist 06/20/2019 11:13:28AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 6202019 6/20/2019 062693 US BANK Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 Fisheries Supply - Parts 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 UPS - Return Shipping 511.000.77.548.68.42.00 The Truck Shop - Parts 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 Omni Packing - Unit M16 - Parts 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 Amazon - Unit 50 - parts 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 UPS - Unit 106 Returns Postage 511.000.77.548.68.49.00 3355 CHINOOKFLIGHT - ANNUAL AIRMAI ChinookFlight - Annual Airman Knowl 422.000.72.531.90.49.00 3439 PAYPAL "NWWA-AWWA SHORT SCI PayPal "NWWA-AWWA Short School 421.000.74.534.80.49.00 PayPal "NWWA-AWWA Short School 423.000.75.535.80.49.00 4474 US BANK COUNCIL VISA MAY 2019 Snohomish Co Cities Dinner for CM 001.000.11.511.60.43.00 AWC Webinar Series for CM Johnsor 001.000.11.511.60.49.00 Snohomish Co Cities Dinner for CM 001.000.11.511.60.43.00 Amazon supplies minus credit for 001.000.11.511.60.31.00 AWC Annual Conference Registratior 001.000.11.511.60.43.00 5593 CITY CLERK- RECORDING, WAPRC SNOHOMISH COUNTY RECORDINC 4.3.b Page: 3 m L 3 c Amoun .y 0 a 87.1- 33.2, m =a 10.4z ui Y m 54.8( 9.6� m c a� 168.0( c �a 17.2, o �a a 165.0( E U 440.0( o R 440.0( o L a a Q rn 125.0( N w 45.0( L 25.3E 3 c 475.0( E t �a Q Page: 3 Packet Pg. 65 vchlist 06/20/2019 11:13:28AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 6202019 6/20/2019 062693 US BANK Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) 421.000.74.534.80.49.00 SNOHOMISH COUNTY RECORDINC 423.000.75.535.80.49.00 SNOHOMISH COUNTY RECORDINC 001.000.25.514.30.49.00 WAPRO 2019 SPRING TRAINING RI 001.000.25.514.30.49.00 AMAZON - CLIP BOARDS 001.000.25.514.30.31.00 WAPRO MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL- 001.000.25.514.30.49.00 AMAZON - WINDOW SIGN HOLDEF 001.000.25.514.30.31.00 SNOHOMISH COUNTY - PARKING F 001.000.25.514.30.49.00 SNOHOMISH COUNTY RECORDINC 001.000.25.514.30.49.00 SNOHOMISH COUNTY RECORDINC 001.000.25.514.30.49.00 AMAZON - WINDOW SIGN HOLDEF 001.000.25.514.30.49.00 7483 WASHINGTON DC TRIP in flight food service 001.000.21.513.10.43.00 Breakfast 001.000.21.513.10.43.00 meal 001.000.21.513.10.43.00 Parking -- Seattle PSRC meeting 001.000.21.513.10.43.00 lunch meeting 001.000.21.513.10.49.00 mayor's luncheon meeting 001.000.21.513.10.49.00 4.3.b Page: 4 m L 3 c Amoun .y 0 a 37.0( 37.0( =a 106.0( ui Y m 200.0( 9.8£ m c aD 25.0( c �a 5.9`. o 3.0( a 101.0( •� U 184.0( o �a 66.2, o L a a Q 4.5( rn 6.6( N W CD 78.8" m L 12.0( 3 c 31.0( E t 21.7, Q Page: 4 Packet Pg. 66 vchlist 06/20/2019 11:13:28AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 6202019 6/20/2019 062693 US BANK 1 Vouchers for bank code : usbank 1 Vouchers in this report Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) 8305 HYATT REGENCY WASH DC - EXPE Hyatt Regency Wash DC - Expenses 001.000.65.518.20.43.00 STIA Public Parking for Wash DC 001.000.65.518.20.43.00 APL'ITUNES - icloud for City cell pho 001.000.65.518.20.31.00 B I D-1 687/0907 BID/ED! ADVERTISING, FOLDERS BID/Ed! new member folders 140.000.61.558.70.31.00 BID/Ed! advertising in MyEdmondsNE 140.000.61.558.70.41.40 Tota I : Bank total Total vouchers 4.3.b Page: 5 m L 3 c Amoun .y 0 a m 130.2( =a 120.0( ui Y m 0.9� m 12.0( (D 55.0( 9,864.91 — 0 L 9,864.9i tu 9,864.9i E U 4- 0 �a 0 L Q a r O N W O d L 3 c as E a Page: 5 Packet Pg. 67 4.3.c PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title) Project Engineering Accounting Project Funding Protect Title Number Number c W STM 174th St. & 71st Ave Storm Improvements c521 EBFB E STM 183rd PI SW Storm Repairs c491 E61FE R 0. m SWR 2016 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Projects c469 ESGA 3 SWR 2017 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Project i013 E6GA WTR 2017 Waterline Replacement Projects i014 E6J13 r STM 2018 Lorian Woods Study s018 EBFA Q. am STR 2018 Minor Sidewalk Project i032 EBDA U STR 2018 Overlay Program i030 EBCB 4) SWR 2018 Sewerline Overlays i035 EBCE is ui lid SWR 2018 Sewerline Replacement Project c492 E6GC U STR 2018 Traffic Calming i027 EBAA U r WTR 2018 Waterline Overlays i034 EBCD c WTR 2018 Waterline Replacement Project c493 E6JC STR 2019 Downtown Parking Study s021 E9AC STR 2019 Guardrail Install i039 E9AB c 0 STR 2019 Overlay Program i036 E9CA STR 2019 Pedestrian Safety Program i041 E9DB SWR 2019 Sewerline Replacement Project c516 EBGA f° v STM 2019 Storm Maintenance Project c525 EBFC 0 WTR 2019 Swedish Waterline Replacement c523 EBJA > 0 STR 2019 Traffic Calming i038 E9AA a a STR 2019 Traffic Signal Upgrades i045 E9AD Q UTILITIES 2019 Utility Rate & GFC Update s020 EBJB WTR 2019 Waterline Overlay i043 E9CB N WTR 2019 Waterline Replacement c498 E7JA co c N STR 2020 Overlay Program i042 EOCA L STR 220th Adaptive i028 EBAB E STM 224th & 98th Drainage Improvements c486 E6FB z o L STR 228th St. SW Corridor Improvements i005 E7AC IL STR 236th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Madrona School) c425 E3DD d rn D STR 238th St. Island & Misc. Ramps i037 EBDC c STR 238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave) c423 E3DB STR 238th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Hwy 99) c485 E6DA Li STR 76th Ave W & 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements i029 EBCA STR 76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements c368 E1CA E t STR 84th Ave W Overlay from 220th to 212th i031 EBCC U STR 89th PI W Retaining Wall i025 E7CD r r Q STR ADA Curb Ramps i033 EBDB STR ADA Transition Plan s016 E6DB Revised 6/12/2019 Packet Pg. 68 4.3.c PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title) Project Engineering Accounting Project Fundinq Project Title Number Number STR Admiral Way Pedestrian Crossing i040 E9DA STR Audible Pedestrian Signals i024 E7AB STR Bikelink Project c474 E5DA SWR Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase I c456 E4GB SWR Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase II c488 E6GB STR Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements i026 E7DC STR Citywide Protected/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion i015 E6AB WTR Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave) c482 E5J13 STM Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station c455 E4FE FAC Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab c443 E4MB STM Edmonds Marsh Feasibility Study c380 E2FC STR Edmonds Street Waterfront Connector c478 E5DB WTR Five Corners Reservoir Re -coating c473 E51KA PM Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor c282 E8MA STR Hwy 99 Enhancements (Phase III) c405 E2AD STR Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization s014 E6AA STM Lake Ballinger Associated Projects c436 E4FD SWR Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study s011 E5GB SWR Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study c461 E4GC STR Minor Sidewalk Program i017 E6DD STM Northstream Culvert Repair Under Puget Drive i011 E6FA STM Northstream Pipe Abandonment on Puget Drive c410 EYE STM NPDES (Students Saving Salmon) m013 E7FG STM OVD Slope Repair & Stabilization m105 E7FA STM Seaview Park Infiltration Facility c479 E5FD WWTP Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring c446 E4HA UTILITIES Standard Details Updates solo E5NA STM Storm Drain Improvements @ 9510 232nd St. SW c495 E7FB STM Stormwater Comp Plan Update s017 E6FD STR Sunset Walkway Improvements c354 ElDA STR Trackside Warning System c470 E5AA UTILITIES Utility Rate Update s013 E6JA PRK Veteran's Plaza c480 E6MA PRK Waterfront Restoration m103 E7MA STM Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration c435 E4FC WWTP WWTP Outfall Pipe Modifications c481 E5HA Revised 6/12/2019 Packet Pg. 69 4.3.c PROJECT NUMBERS (By Engineering Number) Engineering Protect Project Accounting Funding Number Number Protect Title STR EOCA i042 2020 Overlay Program STIR E1CA c368 76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements c354 Sunset Walkway Improvements STIR E2AD c405 Hwy 99 Enhancements (Phase III) E2FC Edmonds Marsh Feasibility Study STIR E3DB c423 238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave) ■ STIR E3DD c425 236th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Madrona School) STM E3FE c410 Northstream Pipe Abandonment on Puget Drive E4FC M" Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration STM E4FD c436 Lake Ballinger Associated Projects FEB Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station SWR E4GB c456 Citvwide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase I c461 Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study WWTP E4HA c446 Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring E4MB Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab STIR ESAA c470 Trackside Warning System iSTIR ESDA Bikelink Project STIR ESDB c478 Edmonds Street Waterfront Connector STM c479 Seaview Park Infiltration Facility SWR ESGA c469 2016 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Projects SWR s011 Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study I WWTP ESHA c481 WWTP Outfall Pipe Modifications Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave) J WTR ESKA c473 Five Corners Reservoir Re -coating Standard Details Updates - STIR E6AA s014 Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization Citywide Protected/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion STIR E6DA c485 238th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Hwy 99) s016 ADA Transition Plan STIR E6DD i017 Minor Sidewalk Program 1 Northstream Culvert Repair Under Puget Drive STM E6FB c486 224th & 98th Drainage Improvements STM E61FE c491 183rd PI SW Storm Repairs SWR i013 2017 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Project SWR E6GB c488 Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase II SWR c492 2018 Sewerline Replacement Project UTILITIES E6JA s013 Utility Rate Update WTR E6JB i014 2017 Waterline Replacement Projects Revised 6/12/2019 Packet Pg. 70 4.3.c PROJECT NUMBERS (By Engineering Number) Engineering Protect Project Accounting Funding Number Number Protect Title WTR E6JC c493 2018 Waterline Replacement Project PRK �MA c480 Veteran's Plaza STR E7AB i024 Audible Pedestrian Signals STR i005 228th St. SW Corridor Improvements STR E7CD i025 89th PI W Retaining Wall STR i026 Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements STM E7FA m 105 OVD Slope Repair & Stabilization STM caft provements @ 9510 232nd St. SW STM E7FG m013 NPDES (Students Saving Salmon) 2019 Waterline Replacement PRK E7MA m103 Waterfront Restoration 2018 Traffic Calming STR E8AB i028 220th Adaptive i029 76th Ave W & 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements STR E8CB i030 2018 Overlay Program CC i031 84th Ave W Overlay from 220th to 212th WTR E8CD i034 2018 Waterline Overlays i035 2018 Sewerline Overlays STR E8DA i032 2018 Minor Sidewalk Project i033 ADA Curb Ramps STR E8DC i037 238th St. Island & Misc. Ramps 018 oods Study STM E8FB c521 174th St. & 71 st Ave Storm Improvements 525 2019 Storm Maintenance Project SWR E8GA c516 2019 Sewerline Replacement Project 3 2019 Swedish Waterline Replacement UTILITIES E8JB s020 2019 Utility Rate & GFC Update c282 Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor STR E9AA i038 2019 Traffic Calming i039 2019 Guardrail Install STR E9AC s021 2019 Downtown Parking Study 2019 Traffic Signal Upgrades STR E9CA i036 2019 Overlay Program WTR E9CB i043 2019 Waterline Overlay STR E9DA i040 Admiral Way Pedestrian Crossing STR E9DB i041 2019 Pedestrian Safety Progr Revised 6/12/2019 Packet Pg. 71 4.3.c PROJECT NUMBERS (By New Project Accounting Number) Engineering Protect Project Accounting Funding Number Number Protect Title PM E8MA c282 Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor STR E1DA c354 Sunset Walkway Improvements STR E1 CA c368 76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements STM E2FC c380 Edmonds Marsh Feasibility Study STR E2AD c405 Hwy 99 Enhancements (Phase III) STM EYE c410 Northstream Pipe Abandonment on Puget Drive STR E3DB c423 238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave) STR E3DD c425 236th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Madrona School) STM E4FC c435 Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration STM E4FD c436 Lake Ballinger Associated Projects FAC E4MB c443 Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab WWTP E4HA c446 Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring STM E4FE c455 Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station SWR E4GB c456 Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase I SWR E4GC c461 Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study SWR E5GA c469 2016 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Projects STR E5AA c470 Trackside Warning System WTR E51KA c473 Five Corners Reservoir Re -coating STR E5DA c474 Bikelink Project STR E5DB c478 Edmonds Street Waterfront Connector STM E5FD c479 Seaview Park Infiltration Facility PRK E6MA c480 Veteran's Plaza WWTP E5HA c481 WWTP Outfall Pipe Modifications WTR E5J13 c482 Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave) STR E6DA c485 238th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Hwy 99) STM E6FB c486 224th & 98th Drainage Improvements SWR E6GB c488 Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase 11 STM E6FE c491 183rd PI SW Storm Repairs SWR E6GC c492 2018 Sewerline Replacement Project WTR E6JC c493 2018 Waterline Replacement Project STM E7FB c495 Storm Drain Improvements @ 9510 232nd St. SW WTR E7JA c498 2019 Waterline Replacement SWR E8GA c516 2019 Sewerline Replacement Project STM E8FB c521 174th St. & 71st Ave Storm Improvements WTR E8JA c523 2019 Swedish Waterline Replacement STM E8FC c525 2019 Storm Maintenance Project STR E7AC i005 228th St. SW Corridor Improvements STM E6FA i011 Northstream Culvert Repair Under Puget Drive SWR E6GA i013 2017 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Project Revised 6/12/2019 Packet Pg. 72 4.3.c PROJECT NUMBERS (By New Project Accounting Number) Engineering Protect Project Accounting Funding Number Number Protect Title WTR E6JB i014 2017 Waterline Replacement Projects STR E6AB i015 Citywide Protected/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion STR E6DD i017 Minor Sidewalk Program STR E7AB i024 Audible Pedestrian Signals STR E7CD i025 89th PI W Retaining Wall STR E7DC i026 Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements STR EBAA i027 2018 Traffic Calming STR EBAB i028 220th Adaptive STR EBCA i029 76th Ave W & 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements STR EBCB i030 2018 Overlay Program STR EBCC i031 84th Ave W Overlay from 220th to 212th STR EBDA i032 2018 Minor Sidewalk Project STR EBDB i033 ADA Curb Ramps WTR EBCD i034 2018 Waterline Overlays SWR EBCE i035 2018 Sewerline Overlays STR E9CA i036 2019 Overlay Program STR EBDC i037 238th St. Island & Misc. Ramps STR E9AA i038 2019 Traffic Calming STR E9AB i039 2019 Guardrail Install STR E9DA i040 Admiral Way Pedestrian Crossing STR E9DB i041 2019 Pedestrian Safety Program STR EOCA i042 2020 Overlay Program WTR E9CB i043 2019 Waterline Overlay STR E9AD i045 2019 Traffic Signal Upgrades STM E7FG m013 NPDES (Students Saving Salmon) PRK E7MA m103 Waterfront Restoration STM E7FA m105 OVD Slope Repair & Stabilization UTILITIES ESNA solo Standard Details Updates SWR ESGB s0l l Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study UTILITIES E6JA s013 Utility Rate Update STR E6AA s014 Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization STR E6DB s016 ADA Transition Plan STM E6FD s017 Stormwater Comp Plan Update STM EBFA s018 2018 Lorian Woods Study UTILITIES EBJB s020 2019 Utility Rate & GFC Update STR E9AC s021 2019 Downtown Parking Study Revised 6/12/2019 Packet Pg. 73 4.3.c PROJECT NUMBERS (By Funding) Project Engineering Accounting Project Funding Project Title Number Number FAC Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab c443 E4MB PM Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor c282 EBMA PRK Veteran's Plaza c480 E6MA PRK Waterfront Restoration m103 E7MA STM 174th St. & 71 st Ave Storm Improvements c521 EBFB STM 183rd PI SW Storm Repairs c491 E61FE STM 2018 Lorian Woods Study s018 EBFA STM 2019 Storm Maintenance Project c525 EBFC STM 224th & 98th Drainage Improvements c486 E6FB STM Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station c455 E41FE STM Edmonds Marsh Feasibility Study c380 E2FC STM Lake Ballinger Associated Projects c436 E4FD STM Northstream Culvert Repair Under Puget Drive i011 E61FA STM Northstream Pipe Abandonment on Puget Drive c410 EYE STM NPDES (Students Saving Salmon) m013 E7FG STM OVD Slope Repair & Stabilization m105 E71FA STM Seaview Park Infiltration Facility c479 ESFD STM Storm Drain Improvements @ 9510 232nd St. SW c495 E7FB STM Stormwater Comp Plan Update s017 E6FD STM Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration c435 E4FC STIR 2018 Minor Sidewalk Project i032 EBDA STIR 2018 Overlay Program i030 EBCB STIR 2018 Traffic Calming i027 EBAA STIR 2019 Downtown Parking Study s021 E9AC STIR 2019 Guardrail Install i039 E9AB STIR 2019 Overlay Program i036 E9CA STIR 2019 Pedestrian Safety Program i041 E9DB STIR 2019 Traffic Calming i038 E9AA STIR 2019 Traffic Signal Upgrades i045 E9AD STIR 2020 Overlay Program i042 EOCA STIR 228th St. SW Corridor Improvements i005 E7AC STIR 236th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Madrona School) c425 E3DD STIR 238th St. Island & Misc. Ramps i037 EBDC STIR 238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave) c423 E3DB STIR 238th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Hwy 99) c485 E6DA STIR 76th Ave W & 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements i029 EBCA STIR 76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements c368 E1CA STIR 84th Ave W Overlay from 220th to 212th i031 EBCC STIR 89th PI W Retaining Wall i025 E7CD Revised 6/12/2019 Packet Pg. 74 4.3.c PROJECT NUMBERS (By Funding) Project Engineering Accounting Project Funding Project Title Number Number STIR ADA Curb Ramps i033 E8DB STIR ADA Transition Plan s016 E6DB STIR Admiral Way Pedestrian Crossing iO4o E9DA STIR Audible Pedestrian Signals i024 E7AB STIR Bikelink Project c474 E5DA STIR Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements i026 E7DC STIR Citywide Protected/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion i015 E6AB STIR Edmonds Street Waterfront Connector c478 E5DB STIR Hwy 99 Enhancements (Phase III) c405 E2AD STIR Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization s014 E6AA STIR Minor Sidewalk Program i017 E6DD STIR Sunset Walkway Improvements c354 E1 DA STIR Trackside Warning System c470 E5AA STIR 220th Adaptive i028 E8AB SWR 2016 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Projects c469 E5GA SWR 2017 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Project i013 E6GA SWR 2018 Sewerline Overlays i035 E8CE SWR 2018 Sewerline Replacement Project c492 E6GC SWR 2019 Sewerline Replacement Project c516 E8GA SWR Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase I c456 E4GB SWR Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase II c488 E6GB SWR Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study sol l E5GB SWR Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study c461 E4GC UTILITIES 2019 Utility Rate & GFC Update s02o E8JB UTILITIES Standard Details Updates solo E5NA UTILITIES Utility Rate Update s013 E6JA WTR 2017 Waterline Replacement Projects i014 E6JB WTR 2018 Waterline Overlays i034 E8CD WTR 2018 Waterline Replacement Project c493 E6JC WTR 2019 Swedish Waterline Replacement c523 E8JA WTR 2019 Waterline Overlay i043 E9CB WTR 2019 Waterline Replacement c498 E7JA WTR Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave) c482 E5J13 WTR Five Corners Reservoir Re -coating c473 E51KA WWTP Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring c446 E4HA WWTP WWTP Outfall Pipe Modifications c481 E5HA Revised 6/12/2019 Packet Pg. 75 4.3.d Payroll Earnings Summary Report City of Edmonds Pay Period: 923 (06/01/2019 to 06/15/2019) c Hour Type Hour Class Description Hours Amount -ed2 REGULAR HOURS Educational Pav Correction 0.00 -156.28 111 ABSENT NO PAY LEAVE 10.00 0.00 121 SICK SICK LEAVE 521.05 20,002.98 122 VACATION VACATION 905.25 37,878.57 123 HOLIDAY HOLIDAY HOURS 6.00 314.33 124 HOLIDAY FLOATER HOLIDAY 22.50 923.52 125 COMP HOURS COMPENSATORY TIME 261.00 10,377.63 130 COMP HOURS Holidav Compensation Used 20.00 759.32 131 MILITARY MILITARY LEAVE 48.00 1,922.29 135 SICK WASHINGTON STATE SICK LEA 18.25 302.06 141 BEREAVEMENT BEREAVEMENT 8.00 217.53 150 REGULAR HOURS Kelly Dav Used 204.00 9,253.52 155 COMP HOURS COMPTIME AUTO PAY 260.70 12,137.76 160 VACATION MANAGEMENT LEAVE 9.00 690.65 190 REGULAR HOURS REGULAR HOURS 17,133.45 699,965.51 196 REGULAR HOURS LIGHT DUTY 40.00 1,827.96 210 OVERTIME HOURS OVERTIME -STRAIGHT 12.00 623.56 215 OVERTIME HOURS WATER WATCH STANDBY 48.00 2,683.00 216 MISCELLANEOUS STANDBY TREATMENT PLANT 15.00 1,296.44 220 OVERTIME HOURS OVERTIME 1.5 433.50 30,419.60 225 OVERTIME HOURS OVERTIME -DOUBLE 3.00 212.77 400 MISCELLANEOUS MISC PAY 0.00 600.00 410 MISCELLANEOUS WORKING OUT OF CLASS 0.00 283.75 411 SHIFT DIFFERENTIAL SHIFT DIFFERENTIAL 0.00 1,236.64 602 COMP HOURS ACCRUED COMP 1.0 156.50 0.00 604 COMP HOURS ACCRUED COMP TIME 1.5 239.50 0.00 606 COMP HOURS ACCRUED COMP 2.0 1.25 0.00 acc MISCELLANEOUS ACCREDITATION PAY 0.00 78.66 acp MISCELLANEOUS Accreditation 1 % Part Time 0.00 9.67 acs MISCELLANEOUS ACCRED/POLICE SUPPORT 0.00 172.00 boc MISCELLANEOUS BOC II Certification 0.00 91.74 colre MISCELLANEOUS Collision Reconstruction ist 0.00 117.51 cpl MISCELLANEOUS TRAINING CORPORAL 0.00 160.86 06/20/2019 Packet Pg. 76 4.3.d Payroll Earnings Summary Report City of Edmonds Pay Period: 923 (06/01/2019 to 06/15/2019) Hour Type Hour Class Description Hours Amount crt MISCELLANEOUS CERTIFICATION III PAY 0.00 564.90 ctr MISCELLANEOUS CTR INCENTIVES PROGRAM 0.00 130.00 det MISCELLANEOUS DETECTIVE PAY 0.00 111.20 det4 MISCELLANEOUS Detective 4% 0.00 1,075.64 ed1 EDUCATION PAY EDUCATION PAY 2% 0.00 649.78 ed2 EDUCATION PAY EDUCATION PAY 4% 0.00 829.56 ed3 EDUCATION PAY EDUCATION PAY 6% 0.00 5,131.95 k9 MISCELLANEOUS K-9 PAY 0.00 217.06 Iq1 LONGEVITY LONGEVITY PAY 2% 0.00 816.16 Ig10 LONGEVITY LONGEVITY 5.5% 0.00 148.17 Ig11 LONGEVITY LONGEVITY PAY 2.5% 0.00 958.20 Ig12 LONGEVITY Lonqevitv 9% 0.00 5,734.58 Ig13 LONGEVITY Lonqevitv 7% 0.00 1,733.25 Ig14 LONGEVITY Lonqevitv 5% 0.00 1,322.33 Ig15 LONGEVITY LONGEVITY 7.5% 0.00 381.68 Iq4 LONGEVITY Lonqevitv 1 % 0.00 371.14 Ig5 LONGEVITY Lonqevitv 3% 0.00 444.80 Iq6 LONGEVITY Lonqevitv .5% 0.00 269.59 Iq7 LONGEVITY Lonqevitv 1.5% 0.00 507.39 Ig9 LONGEVITY Lonqevitv 3.5% 0.00 104.93 mtc MISCELLANEOUS MOTORCYCLE PAY 0.00 222.40 pols SICK Preqnancv Disablitv Sick 12.10 413.06 poly VACATION Preqnancv Disablitv Vacation 27.90 952.44 nds MISCELLANEOUS Public Disclosure Specialist 0.00 101.78 phv MISCELLANEOUS PHYSICAL FITNESS PAY 0.00 2,154.45 prof MISCELLANEOUS PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS ; 0.00 173.48 sdp MISCELLANEOUS SPECIAL DUTY PAY 5% 0.00 287.66 sqt MISCELLANEOUS ADMINISTRATIVE SERGEANT 0.00 173.48 sro MISCELLANEOUS School Resource Officer 0.00 111.20 str MISCELLANEOUS STREET CRIMES 0.00 462.88 traf MISCELLANEOUS TRAFFIC 0.00 241.31 06/20/2019 Packet Pg. 77 4.3.d Payroll Earnings Summary Report City of Edmonds Pay Period: 923 (06/01/2019 to 06/15/2019) Hour Type Hour Class Description Hours 20,415.95 Total Net Pay: Amount $861,200.00 $582,089.09 06/20/2019 Packet Pg. 78 4.3.e Benefit Checks Summary Report City of Edmonds Pay Period: 923 - 06/01/2019 to 06/15/2019 Bank: usbank - US Bank Check # Date Payee # Name Check Amt Direct Deposit 63759 06/20/2019 epoa2 EPOA-POLICE 5,661.00 0.00 63760 06/20/2019 epoa3 EPOA-POLICE SUPPORT 681.64 0.00 63761 06/20/2019 flex NAVIA BENEFIT SOLUTIONS 2,116.24 0.00 63762 06/20/2019 teams TEAMSTERS LOCAL 763 4,811.00 0.00 63763 06/20/2019 icma VANTAGE TRANSFER AGENTS 304884 4,582.81 0.00 17,852.69 0.00 Bank: wire - US BANK Check # Date Payee # Name Check Amt Direct Deposit 2892 06/20/2019 awc AW C 321,436.97 0.00 2895 06/20/2019 wadc WASHINGTON STATE TREASURER 29,424.84 0.00 2896 06/20/2019 us US BANK 105,040.71 0.00 2897 06/20/2019 mebt WTRISC FBO #N3177B1 104,962.07 0.00 2900 06/20/2019 pb NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTION 6,472.32 0.00 2901 06/20/2019 oe OFFICE OF SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT 628.50 0.00 567,965.41 0.00 Grand Totals: 585,818.10 0.00 c .N 0 a a� =a vi Y m U c a� c 0 a E 0 0 0 L Q a Q M 0 N W O N d C O i O Q r C d E t U R a 6/20/2019 Packet Pg. 79 4.4 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 06/25/2019 Edmonds Employee Association, Local 3517 (AFSCME Council 2) 2018-2020 collective bargaining agreement Staff Lead: Human Resources Department: Human Resources Preparer: MaryAnn Hardie Background/History The City has been in negotiations with the Edmonds Employee Association, Local 3517 (AFSCME Council 2) Union regarding the 1/1/18-12/31/20 collective bargaining agreement. The City and the Union have reached an agreement to settle the contract for this period. Staff Recommendation For approval by Council in executive session on 6/25/19. Approval by Council on the 6/25/19 consent agenda. Narrative The City has been in negotiations with the Edmonds Employee Association, Local 3517 (AFSCME Council 2) Union regarding the 1/1/18-12/31/20 collective bargaining agreement. The City and the Union have come to an agreement in order to settle the contract for this period. A copy of the 1/1/18-12/31/20 collective bargaining agreement between the City and the Edmonds Employee Association, Local 3517 (AFSCME Council 2) is attached. Attachments: 2018-2020 City Proposal- 6.14.19- FINAL 2018-2020 City Proposal- no redline 6.19.19 FINAL.doc Packet Pg. 80 4.4.a REVISED CITY PACKAGE PROPOSAL 6/14/19 AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON AND SEPA110E EMPLOYEES iNTERNATIONAL UNION, LOCAL EDMONDS EMPLOYEE ASSOCIATION, LOCAL 3517 (AFSCME COUNCIL 2) January 1, 20185, through December 31, 20207 Packet Pg. 81 4.4.a AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON AND SEPATICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION, LOCAL 925 EDMONDS EMPLOYEE ASSOCIATION, LOCAL 3517 (AFSCME COUNCIL 2) January 1, 20185, through December 31, 20204-7 ARTICLE SUBJECT PAGE ARTICLE I RECOGNITION, UNION MEMBERSHIP AND PAYROLL DEDUCTION 3 ARTICLE II HOURS OF WORK 4 ARTICLE III OVERTIME 5 ARTICLE IV POSITION CLASSIFICATIONS, RATES OF PAY AND 5 NON-DISCRIMINATION ARTICLE V HOLIDAYS 7 ARTICLE VI VACATION 8 ARTICLE VII LEAVES WITH PAY 9 ARTICLE VIII OTHER LEAVES OF ABSENCE 12 ARTICLE IX HEALTH AND WELFARE 13 ARTICLE X JOB SHARE 14 ARTICLE XI EVALUATION 15 ARTICLE XII CHANGE IN STATUS 16 ARTICLE XIII SUSPENSION AND DISCHARGE 18 ARTICLE XIV UNION RIGHTS 19 ARTICLE XV RIGHTS OF MANAGEMENT 20 ARTICLE XVI WORK STOPPAGE 20 ARTICLE XVII MISCELLANEOUS 21 ARTICLE XVIII GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE 22 ARTICLE XIX ENTIRE AGREEMENT 24 ARTICLE XX SAVINGS CLAUSE 25 ARTICLE XXI TERM OF AGREEMENT 25 2 Packet Pg. 82 4.4.a APPENDIX "A" 26 AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON ANDCER-VIDE EMPLOYEES iNTERN A TIONr A r tNIO r LOCAL 925 EDMONDS EMPLOYEE ASSOCIATION, LOCAL 3517 (AFSCME COUNCIL 2) January 1, 201f - through December 31, 202017 THIS AGREEMENT is between the CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON (hereinafter called the City or the Employ) and SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION, ,LOCA T 923the EDMONDS EMPLOYEE ASSOCIATION, LOCAL 3517 (AFSCME COUNCIL 2) (hereinafter called the Union) for the purpose of setting forth the agreement between the parties re: wages, hours, and conditions of employment of those employees for whom the City has recognized the Union as the exclusive collective bargaining representative. The parties agree that all usage of male pronouns refer to both male and female employees and is in no way intended to discriminate against nor exclude female employees. Article I - Recognition, Union Membership and Payroll Deduction 1.1 Recognition. The City recognizes the Union as the exclusive bargaining agent for the following described employees as certified by the Public Employment Relations Commission in case number 3259-E-81-030, and the City agrees that the Union shall be said employees' representative for the management of this Agreement: INCLUDED: All regular full- and part-time clerical, professional and technical employees regularly scheduled for twenty (20) or more hours per week as listed by position in Appendix "A". Note: The list of Job Titles in Section A.3 in no way limits the number of job titles which may be included within the bargaining unit. EXCLUDED: All positions contained in other bargaining units, including public works shop and field laborers, custodial and service positions and parks maintenance laborers; Police Department; Executive Assistant; Council Executive Assistant; Office Administrators; Human Resources Department; City Clerk; supervisory, professional, and management; and confidential employees as described under the Act; temporary or interim -funded positions. 1.2 Union Membership. All o rleyees hired after- the 0 0 „tio f this Agreement an employees who are members of the Union on the exeetttion date of this Agr-eemel+t shall, as -a eondition of emplor:nent, be obligmed to join the Union or- pay an amotm4 equivalei# to th-e remain members in good standing. Good standing shall mean the pa-�qment of r-egtdar- ffloflth�y dues or- seFviee fees unifofmly r-equir-ed by the Union. This obligation shall eommenee thiFty (30) ealendar- days following hire or- thifty (30) ealendar- days following the exeeu4ion date of this Agr-eemm,. 3 Packet Pg. 83 4.4.a MIR s�. .es ssts. :tesrsPMRF WIMW s The Union agrees to represent all employees in the bargaining unit regardless of membership or non -membership status. 1.3 Payroll Deduction. The City agrees to deduct monthly Union dues uniformly levied against Union members who have authorized such deductions in writing in accordance with applicable law, and to transfer such amounts to the Union. Written authorization for payroll deduction is valid whether executed in hard copy or electronically RC -NV n , « , nn an ,hal tfaftsmit the same -to the T- on. The City shall provide an electronic copy of any written authorization for payroll deduction to the Union via email within ten (10) dqys of the employ executing such authorization. The City also agrees to deduct from the paycheck of those employees that have submitted written authorization contributions to P.E.O.P.L.E.COPE and transmit same to the Union. No deduction shall be made which is prohibited by gpplicable law. The Union will indemnify, defend and hold the City harmless against any claims made and against any suit instituted against the City which may arise by reason of any action taken b. the Employer to comply with the provisions of this Article, including reimbursement for an.. legal fees or expenses incurred in connection with such action. The Employer will promptly notify the Union in writing of any claim, demand, suit or other form of liability asserted against it relating to its implementation of this Article. If requested by the Union in writing, the Employer will surrender any_ such claim, demand, suit or other form of liability to the Union for defense and resolution^„ a „t of any ,.heek off of dues for- the T ni ,r The Union agrees to refund to the City any amounts paid to it in error on a,,,,,,,,,,* of the ,.beek agpr-ovisioi+-upon presentation of proper evidence thereof. The Gi0y, shall ide an eleet, ,,, - of the „4bo -iz atio t the U,,.;,,n within to (, m days f pt. The Employer shall honor the terms and conditions of each employee's authorization for payroll deduction. Whether an employee a union member or not, the Employer shall continue to deduct and remit Union dues and fees to the Union until such time as the Union notifies the Employer that the dues authorization has been properly terminated in compliance with the payroll deduction authorization executed b. the employee. Every effort will be made to end the deduction effective on the first payroll, but not later than the second payroll of the Employer's receipt of the Employee's written notice. 1.4 Pertinent Information. The Union will be provided with pertinent information regarding new vacancies, new appointments, or termination in positions within the bargaining unit. Pertinent information includes position titles, descriptions, salary ranges, and dates of appointments or terminations of employees within the bargaining unit. 4 Packet Pg. 84 4.4.a 1.5 New Employee Orientation. A Union official shall, at no loss of pay, be granted up to thirty (30) minutes to provide the new employee a basic overview of the employee's rights and responsibilities regarding Union membership, dues authorizations, and Union insurance.: Article II - Hours of Work 2.1 Standard Work Week. The standard work week shall be five (5) consecutive work days of eight (8) hours each or four (4) consecutive work days of ten (10) hours each. The standard work week shall be forty (40) hours per week and shall normally be scheduled Monday through Friday. The working hours of each day shall be normally between 7:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. with the exception of employees in the Parks and Recreation Department whose working hours may be adjusted to include up to two (2) evenings per week for each employee. In any event, the total hours worked shall not exceed forty (40) hours per week unless overtime is paid or compensatory time is earned. Other schedules may be established by mutual agreement of the employee and City. Rates of pay for work other than during the standard workweek shall be as provided in Article III - Overtime. It is further recognized that 9/80 schedules may not be feasible for every department and must be approved by the department head. 2.2 Schedule Change. Normally, at least seven (7) calendar days advance notice shall be given the employee prior to the commencement of a schedule change, except in the case where emergency operations cannot be anticipated. 2.3 Lunch and Breaks. A lunch period of between one half (1 /2) hour and one (1) hour for each employee shall be scheduled approximately midway through the workday. Each employee shall receive a 15 minute paid relief period approximately midway of both the morning and the afternoon shift. Lunch shall be considered the employees' own time and may normally be taken away from the City's premises. 2.4 Flexible Hours. If scheduled at least seven (7) calendar days in advance, the hours of employees may be adjusted to include evening hours, provided the employee is given the option to adjust her/his hours for any one (1) day of the work week so that the total hours worked is not in excess of forty (40) hours, subject to Section 2.1. If the employee is not given seven (7) calendar days' notice, all time worked after six p.m. shall be compensated at the overtime rate or by time and one-half compensatory time. 2.5 Shift Differential. Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 2.1 Standard Work Week, the standard work week for the position of Senior Office Specialist in Parks and Recreation may be established to five (5) consecutive days, Monday through Friday, from 12:00 p.m. until 9:00 p.m. and shall be compensated five percent (5%) per hour in addition to their regular hourly rate of pay for all hours worked after 5 p.m. Article III - Overtime Packet Pg. 85 4.4.a 3.1 General. Overtime cash payment or compensatory time off by mutual agreement between the City and the employee, at one and one-half (1-1/2) times the overtime worked, at the regular hourly rate of the employee's salary, shall be earned for time worked beyond the 40 hour work week established by 2.1. A minimum of one -quarter (1/4) hour's overtime payment or compensatory time off shall be earned when required to work beyond the scheduled work week. After the first one -quarter (1/4) hour, each one -quarter (1/4) hour or major portion thereof shall be compensated. Overtime shall be recognized only upon prior approval of the employee's supervisor or department head. 3.2 Callback. A minimum of three (3) hours at one and one- half (1-1/2) times the employee's regular hourly rate shall be earned for callbacks. Time worked beyond the minimum shall be compensated at one and one-half (1-1/2) times the actual time worked in one -quarter (1/4) hour increments for each one -quarter (1/4) hour or major portion thereof. 3.3 Compensatory Time. Employees shall have the right to convert compensatory time off to an overtime cash payment by making a written request on the employee's timesheet. Compensatory time may be taken with the approval of the supervisor or at the direction of the supervisor, provided the employee is given ten (10) working days' notice. Article IV - Position Classifications, Rates of Pay and Non -Discrimination 4.1 Position Classifications and Pay Grades. The classifications of positions covered by this Agreement and the corresponding rates of pay shall be as set forth in Appendix "A" which is attached hereto and made a part of this Agreement. These rates of pay shall be regarded as contractual minimum rates. 4.2 Working Out of Classification. An employee assigned by a supervisor, in writing, or has in the course of regular duties to have assumed all the duties of a higher classification for a period of four (4) or more consecutive working days, or performs said duties in a greater than 1/2 FTE (full time equivalent) basis for more than one pay period, shall during the period of that assignment be placed at the step on the wage scale of the higher classification that provides an increase over the employee's regular rate of pay of at least five percent (5%). This shall include work out of classification to cover for another employee's scheduled vacation. Seniority shall be a consideration when assigning employees to work out of classification. 4.3 No Pyramiding. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, premium or overtime pay shall not be duplicated or pyramided. In no case shall premium or overtime pay be based on other than the employee's regular straight time rate of pay to the extent permitted by FLSA. 4.4 Job Descriptions. The duties, responsibilities, and qualifications of positions shall be contained in Job Descriptions of the Classification Plan. Copies of said descriptions and revisions thereto shall be provided to the Union and the affected employee(s). The creation and revision of job descriptions shall be a management prerogative. However, an employee may request a review of his/her job description. The Human Resources Director shall confer with the 6 Packet Pg. 86 4.4.a supervisor and the affected employee(s) to review the recommendations and suggestions. The Human Resources Director shall record the summary of reasons for revising or not revising the job description and provide a copy to the requesting employee within sixty (60) days of the request. Provided, the review shall not be subject to appeal through the grievance procedure. 4.5 New Job Classifications. Should it become necessary to establish a new job classification within the bargaining unit during the term of this Agreement, the City may designate a job classification title and salary for the classification. The salary for any new classification within the bargaining unit shall become subject to negotiation at such time as the salaries for the subsequent contract year are negotiated or take effect. 4.6 Non -Discrimination. The City and the Union agree those statutory requirements and obligations concerning equal employment opportunities, affirmative action, and all other applicable anti -discrimination state and federal laws and regulations shall be adhered to. Complaints of discrimination under this section shall be subject to the grievance procedure but shall not be subject to arbitration. No employee shall be discriminated against, and their employment security will not be threatened, for upholding the provisions of this Agreement or seeking the enforcement of their right to nondiscrimination through an appropriate government agency. Article V - Holidays 5.1 Designation of Holidays. The following shall be considered paid holidays for full-time employees. Part-time employees regularly working twenty (20) hours per week or more shall receive prorated compensation for the following holidays, based on their regularly scheduled hours. New Year's Day Martin Luther King, Jr. Day President's Day Memorial Day Independence Day Labor Day Veteran's Day Thanksgiving Day Friday following Thanksgiving Day January 1 Third Monday of January Third Monday of February The Last Monday in May July 4 First Monday of September November 11 Fourth Thursday of November 7 Packet Pg. 87 4.4.a Day before Christmas Day December 24 Christmas Day December 25 A floating holiday will be given to each full time employee (pro -rated for part time regular employees) after six consecutive months of employment. The floating holiday shall not be carried over into the next calendar year. In the event of termination before June 30, an employee who has completed six (6) months of employment shall be paid for one-half of that year's floating holiday, if unused. If termination is after June 30, an employee who has completed six (6) months of employment shall be given full payment for the floating holiday, if unused. If Christmas Day or the day before Christmas falls on a weekend day, an alternative workday will be selected provided the employee gets four consecutive days off. Holiday time shall be considered time worked when computing overtime. If a holiday falls on a Saturday, the preceding Friday will be observed as the holiday. If a holiday falls on a Sunday, Monday will be observed as the holiday. 5.2 Holiday Pay. Eligible full-time employees will receive eight (8) hours of pay at their straight -time rate for each holiday. Part-time employees will receive holiday pay on a prorated basis. Employees are eligible for holiday pay if they are in paid status on the regular business day preceding the holiday. Employees whose employment is terminated immediately prior to a holiday are not entitled to holiday pay. Employees who are normally scheduled to work more than eight (8) hours on a day observed as a holiday may use vacation leave, compensatory time, or leave without pay to make up the difference between the employee's normally scheduled shift and the eight (8) hours of holiday pay. An employee assigned to work on any holiday shall be compensated at the overtime rate of pay in addition to the holiday pay, with a minimum guarantee of four (4) hours pay. 5.3 Four Day Per Week Employees. When a holiday falls on a four -day per week, or 9/80, employee's scheduled day off, an extra day of holiday with pay will be granted in lieu thereof. Article VI - Vacation 6.1 General. Employees covered by this Agreement shall accrue vacation leave with pay depending on the length of continuous service with the City. Part-time employees regularly working twenty (20) hours or more per week shall accrue vacation leave on a prorated basis. 6.2 Accrual. Full-time employees shall accrue the following amount of vacation time with pay, depending on the length of continuous service with the City: 8 Packet Pg. 88 4.4.a YEARS OF EMPLOYMENT VACATION MAHMUMALLOWED VACATIONACCR UAL First 6 months 48 hours -- Second six months 40 hours Additional -- I through 4 years 88 hours 176 5 through 9 years 128 hours 256 10 through 14 years 168 hours 336 15 through 19 years 176 hours 352 20 through 24 years 192 hours 384 25 years thereafter 208 hours 416 Employees shall not use vacation leave before completing six (6) months of continuous service with the CAP,. Employees who have reached maximum vacation accrual (24 months of accrual) will not accrue additional vacation until they have reduced their accrued balance. 6.3 Computation. Only those days on which the employee would normally be required to work shall be counted in computing the vacation period to which the employee is entitled. When a holiday falls within an employee's vacation period, the holiday will not be counted as a day of vacation. Vacation pay is computed on the straight time base rate in effect at the time vacation is taken. 6.4 Scheduling Employees shall submit vacation requests prior to March 1. Upon receipt of same, the City shall develop a schedule of vacations, which shall be posted on or before April 1. In the event more employees than can be scheduled request the same dates and the conflict cannot be resolved by mutual agreement among the requesting employees, the requests of the most senior employees will prevail. All vacation requests made after March 1 shall be granted where possible. Employees will be required to take vacation during a period that will be determined by departmental workload and their Supervisor. Changes in the posted vacation schedule shall be made only as necessary to meet the demands of the workload. 6.5 Accrual During Compensated Leave. Employees who are on compensated leave (vacation, sick, shared leave or any other approved paid leave) shall continue to accrue vacation leave at the regularly prescribed rate during such absence. 6.6 Compensation Upon Termination/Death. Upon termination of an employee, any accumulated vacation shall be paid off. Upon the death of an employee in active service, such payment will be made to the beneficiary of the deceased employee. 7.1 Sick Leave. Article VII - Leaves with Pay 9 Packet Pg. 89 4.4.a 7.1.1 Accrual. Sick leave with pay shall accrue at the rate of eight hours for each full calendar month of the full-time employee's service; provided that once an employee accrues 1,000 sick leave hours. the accrual rate will be one (1) hour of sick leave accrued for every 40 hours worked each calendar year, with a maximum amount of 1,040 hours of sick leave to be carried over each year. If an employee's total accrual drops below one thousand (1,000) hours, the standard accrual rate per their percentage of full-time employee status will continue until the employee again reaches one thousand (1,000,) hours. Part-time employees regularly working twenty (20) hours per week or more shall receive prorated sick leave.Any sick leave—aeeruea�unused, shall accumulate up t a total f e thousand (1 nnm 1,ou Provided theT a�rmyee .sue year,aceFued in exeess of eight hundred (900) houfs of siek leave may eonvert such exeess houFs to cash payment at a rate Of thFee (3) houfs of siek leave fOF One (1) hE)Uf COMPefiSation, at the employee's eurrent fate of pay, up to a maximum of one thousand dollaFs ($1000.00) per- year. Employees inust t!equest optional siek leave eash out within ten (10) working days from their- notiee of aeefued siek leave. The siek leave eash out shall be paid on the first payeheek in January of the following yean The City shall notify the employees of their aeerued siek leave houfs by November 1 of each granAing siek to 7.1.23 Definition of Sick Leave. An employee eligible for sick leave with pay shall be granted such leave for any reason allowed by awthe following r-easens, and for periods of one heurfifteen 0 5, minutest or more: a. The employee's own illness, injury or disability (including disability due to pregnancy or childbirth); -Aan absence resulting from an employee's mental or physical illness, injury or health condition; to accommodate the employee's need for medical diagnosis, care or treatment of a mental or physical illness, injury or health condition; or an employee's need for preventive medical care; h—b. The need to care for a family member with a mental or physical illness injury or health condition: to care efor a familv member who needs medical diagnosis. care or treatment of a mental or physical illness;; or to care for a family member who needs preventive medical care;Ehila „�de gli y � R� ��e� teems e-a�.y-c�€-�x,.o Oh; e. ineapable of self ear-e, with a health eendition requiring tfeatmen4 E)r- s c. When the employee's workplace has been closed by order of a public official for any health -related reason, or when an employee's child's school or place of care has been closed for such a reason. The need to care for the employee's immediate family as defined in article 7.2 with a serious health condition or emergency condition; d. For absences that qualify for leave under the domestic violence leave act, chapter 49.76 RCW; Scheduled medical or dental appointments for the employee or a dependent child, provided that the employee receives advance approval from the Department head or designee; and further provided that employees must make 10 Packet Pg. 90 4.4.a reasonable efforts to schedule such appointments at times when they will not interfere with the scheduled work days; e. For purposes of this Section, "family member" means a child, including a biological, adopted or foster child, step -child, or a child to whom the employee stands in loco parentis, is a legal guardian or is a de facto parent, regardless of age or dependency status; a biological, adoptive, de facto or foster parent, step-parent or legal guardian of an employee or the employee's spouse or registered domestic partner or a person who stood in loco parentis when the employee was a minor child; a spouse; a registered domestic partner; a grandparent; a grandchild or a sibling_; At their election, employees may use other accrued paid leave in place of or in addition to sick leave for any of the purposes described above. The certificate of a physician and/or written report concerning the need for the sick leave may be required by the Employer for absences exceeding three (3) days, and if required, shall be supplied by the employee in order to qualify for sick leave with pay. The Employer's requirements for verification may not result in an unreasonable burden or expense on the employee and may not exceed privacy or verification requirements otherwise established by law. 7.1.34 Pay Out Upon Termination. Upon honorable termination., accrued, but unused, sick leave up to a maximum of eight hundred (800) hours shall be paid according to the following percentage of the rate of pay in effect immediately prior to termination: a. Employees as of May 1, 198-2-. 1. NleluiAar-y quit with loss than siek lease 00% leave cno6 a. Employee payout on separation. yees hired or- rehired after- May 1, 1982. 1-. Voluntary quit with two 1,, ndr-01 (200hourS o more aeefued se 11 Packet Pg. 91 4.4.a 2-3. Layoff 50% 25% 34. NofmakService Retirement (PERS) 50% be. Employee payout on retirement. In addition to the above payments, an employee with accrued sick leave over the 800 hour cap shall be entitled to receive up to 100 hours of payout on the ,,,,,lo,. the following condition that l . Payout is ,,,,nditione,l on -the employee isbe-ing eligible and appliesying for retirement through the PERS system. Payment to be processed in conjunction with application. 2. Payout shall be made dir-eetly to a tax defefTed aeeount sueh as a VEBA or- HSA (should the latter- be established)-. Payment shall be on a one-to-one hour basis for accrued sick leave hours in the employee's bank between 800 and 900 hours. Union members, as a ,group (provided that every bargaining unit member agrees to such decision), may vote to have this payment made to their existing City HRANEBA account instead of in the form of a cash payment. In the event of death of the employee, payment for all unused sick leave (100% of accrued sick leave) shall be made to the surviving spouse or to his/her estate if there is no spouse, at his/her regular straight -time hourly rate of pay. 7.1.4- Worker's Compensation Offset. If an employee is simultaneously entitled to Worker's Compensation benefits and sick leave, the employee may decline the Worker's Compensation offset of sick leave usage by giving written notification to his/her supervisor within three (3) calendar days of the filing of the disability claim. Employees who are using the Worker's Compensation offset must turn over to the City Human Resources Department all compensation received from the Department of Labor and Industries, which will be used to restore a proportionate amount of sick leave used during the absence. Employees, who exhaust their accrued sick leave or elect not to use the Worker's Compensation offset, may be placed on leave without pay for a maximum of six (6) months provided the employee is able to return to work. 7.2 Bereavement Leave. Regular Full-time employees may receive up to three (3) days bereavement leave with pay in the event of a death in their immediate family. "Immediate family" means spouse, son, daughter, mother, father, brother, sister, mother-in-law, father-in-law, brother-in-law, sister-in-law, grandparents, grandchildren, and step -relations. Spouse shall mean an individual who is married to a City employee under the laws of the State of Washington, or who is in a domestic partnership which is registered with or recognized by the State of Washington in accord with the provisions of Chapter 43.07 RCW. Immediate family also refers 12 Packet Pg. 92 4.4.a to the spouse's relatives the same as designated for employee. Additional leave may be granted subject to approval of the Department Director and shall be charged against accumulated sick leave. 7.3 Jury Duty Leave. While on jury duty the employee shall receive his/her base pay, longevity, and other premiums required by collective bargaining agreement not including overtime, from the City. The employee must turn over to the City all additional compensation received for jury duty not to include mileage reimbursement. 7.4 Reserve Duty Leave. An employee who is a member of a State National Guard or Federal Reserve Military Unit shall be entitled to be absent from his or her duties with the City in accordance with state and federal statutes. Article VIII - Other Leaves of Absence 8.1 Family and Medical Leave (FML) Eligible employees are entitled to the full benefit and protection of the State and Federal Family Medical Leave (FML) and Pregnancy Disability laws. In addition to the legal requirements, the following provisions and benefits shall apply. 1) Employees are required to use accrued sick leave during any state or federal FML or pregnancy disability leave, provided the use of such leave qualifies under Section 7.1.23 herein. 2) Employees may use accrued vacation during any state and or federal FML or pregnancy disability leave, but shall not be required to do so. 3) The City is required to continue the employee's health benefits for the duration of the federal FML at the same level and under the same conditions as if the employee had been continuously employed and on paid status. 4) Federal FML shall be based upon a rolling 12 month year beginning on the date an employee takes his/her first FML leave. 8.1.1 Paid Family Medical Leave Act (PFML). Employees are ehizible for Ppaid Ffamily Mmedical Lleave Aact leave benefits as allowed under state law effective January 1, 2020. The premium cost for the leave will be collected effective upon ratification of this Agreement 4-,,14W as follows: • The Employer will pay for 55% of the premiums due for the medical leave portion, with the employee paying 45% of the remaining premium dues. • The Employer will pay 100% of premiums due for the family leave portion of the premiums dues. 13 Packet Pg. 93 4.4.a 8.2 Discretionary Unpaid Leaves. A leave of absence without pay may be granted to any employee by the Department Director for such reasons as family care or emergency, education and personal business. 8.3 Return from Leave. Upon return from unpaid leave, all benefit accrual calculations, seniority rights, and credit for continuous service shall resume at the same level or with the same rights as the employee experienced prior to going on leave. For the purposes of leave accrual and MEBT vesting, an adjusted date will be used that reflects all previous months worked prior to taking leave. The employee's annual performance evaluation date (anniversary date) will be adjusted to reflect their time off due to the leave of absence. 8.4 Health Coverage During Unpaid Non-FML Leave. During the period of an approved leave of absence, monthly premiums for medical insurance may be paid to the City for payment to the insurance company to the extent the policy allows continued coverage, so as to maintain continued coverage. 8.5 Terms of the Leave. The City shall state in writing the terms of the leave of absence at the time it is granted. Unless otherwise provided herein, no sick leave or vacation leave shall accrue during any leave, nor shall the employee be entitled to any other benefits during the leave. Article IX - Health and Welfare 9.1 Coverage. The City shall make available to eligible regular full-time and regular part- time employees, and their eligible spouses and dependents, an insurance program that includes medical, dental, life and vision insurance, and an employee assistance plan (EAP) benefit. "Spouse" shall mean an individual who is married to a City employee under the laws of the State of Washington, or who is in a domestic partnership which is registered with or recognized by the State of Washington in accord with the provisions of Chapter 43.07 RCW. This insurance program includes the following: 9.1.1 Medical Insurance. Employees may choose between the following medical plans: Association of Washington Cities ("AWC") HealthFirst 250 or AWC Group Health Cooperative Kaiser Permanente $2-0 Co -pay Plan. The Employer reserves the right to re -open negotiations related to medical insurance. 9.1.2 Dental Insurance. Dental insurance is provided through the AWC Washington Dental Service Plan F with Option III (orthodontia). 9.1.3 Vision Insurance. Vision insurance is provided through the AWC Vision Service Plan ($10.00 deductible). 9.1.4 EAP Benefit. The Employee Assistance Program is provided through AWC. 9.1.5 Life Insurance. The City will pay one hundred percent (100%) of the basic life insurance premium. 14 Packet Pg. 94 4.4.a 9.1.6 Light Duty. When an employee is injured at work and is released to light or modified work duties and the employer has light and/or modified work duty available for the employee, the employee will return to work on light duty during their normal working hours. 9.1.7 Flexible Spending Account (FSA). The City shall provide and administer a Flexible Spending Account (FSA) using pre-tax deductions from employees for qualified medical, childcare, transportation and other permitted uses as allowed by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Code Section 125 for employees and their eligible dependents. The FSA is will be made available toemployees no iate f than r,,,,,,,,,,, i �ni ti Health Reimbursement Arrangement / Voluntary Employees' Beneficiary Association (HRA/VEBA). The Employer- auees t „de a NIEB ^or- sofflethine similar to bar- �;t ,v, mbe , ition f the savines the Employer .,., ehie„e t the Re e Bi„e Shield 250 Pla and the Kaiser no,.m. nente $20 C Pa-W$20 Deduetibl 4a Reeenee Blue Shield 14ealthFir-st 250 Plan. Eff-eetive upon ratifleation, assumine ation i 20 Q the E i, ver will. mmake ., e ;t nibe Kaiser Permanente $20 Ce $200 Ded'u'ccrole Plan. E ecci=c�pvn one time i,,,Y, stim pmqEent into ., NIEB n in the ., rt of $250 bar-eainine unit member. 9.1.8 The E i „trib utions t the vEu n a not rstituto a status Que t , alk-o Efnplo,vees' .. The Employer will establish an HRANEBA for each employee who is eligible and enrolled in or covered by one of the Employer's health insurance plans as described in Section 91-0.1.12. The Employer agrees to _pay all fees for the establishment and maintenance of the HRA/VEBA accounts for which it is le - ally allowed to paves. Effective upon ratification, the Employer agrees to make the following contributions to the HRA/VEBA accounts: Year Contribution 2018 & 2019 (upon ratification) 1 $1250 (one time) January 1, 2020 $250 The Employer's contributions to the HRA/VEBA account in the amount of $250 each year employee will be provided contingent - upon the bargaining_ rgroup (as a whole) meeting the annual participation requirement for the AWC Well City Award. 15 Packet Pg. 95 4.4.a Union members, as a group, may vote to make contributions via payroll deduction to their HRA/VEBA account. The amount of the HRA/VEBA contribution may be adjusted by majority vote of Union members, no more than once per year, and with appropriate notice to the City. Health Insurance Premiums. 9.2 Full -Time Employees. For all regular full-time employees and their eligible spouses and dependents, the City will pay 90% of the premium costs of the benefits specified in Section 9.1. 9.3 Part-time Employees. For regular part-time employees normally scheduled to work a minimum of twenty (20) hours per week and their eligible spouses and dependents, the City's premium contribution described in Section 9.2 will be reduced on a pro -rated basis according to the part-time employee's budgeted FTE. Changes to Health Insurance Plans. 9.4 Changes to Plan Benefits. Benefit changes other than those plans specified in Section 9.1 will be made by mutual agreement. Article X - Job Share 10.1 Definition and Implementation. A job share position is defined as a full-time budgeted position, which is occupied by two (2) part-time employees. Job sharing shall be implemented, and thereafter continued, only upon the approval of the Supervisor and the Department Head of the relevant position(s) and, in the instance of an occupied position, the request of the employee. 10.2 Schedule. Employees will share a full-time position on a half-time basis using a work schedule, which is convenient to the City and the employees. Examples of schedules that might be used are: (1) Each employee works four (4) hours per day; (2) Each employee works forty (40) hours in alternating weeks; (3) Each employee works twenty-four (24) hours one week and sixteen (16) hours the alternate week; (4) Each employee works two and one-half (2-1/2) days per week. 10.3 Coordination. The employees will be expected to coordinate with each other so that the responsibilities of the position and the level of required productivity are not adversely affected. 10.4 Compensation. Each employee will be paid one-half (1/2) of the established salary for the position. Due to seniority, the two (2) employees may be paid at different steps in the salary grade, however, whenever one (1) employee is on vacation, sick leave or absent the second employee shall have right of first refusal for available hours Whenever one (1) employee works during vacation, sick leave or other absence of the second employee, the working employee will receive additional compensation at the regular rate of pay for excess hours worked up to forty 16 Packet Pg. 96 4.4.a (40) hours in one (1) week. Any hours worked beyond forty (40) in one (1) week will be compensated at time and one-half. 10.5 Benefits. Each employee working a minimum of 20 hours a week will be entitled to the following prorated benefits: 1. Vacation, Sick Leave and Holidays on a pro -rated basis; 2. Medical, Dental and Vision insurance with the City share of the premium pro- rated; 3. Basic Life Insurance paid for in full by the City; 4. Participation in the state Retirement Program (PERS) and the Municipal Employees' Benefit Trust; 5. Participation in other employee programs, including but not limited to the Employee Suggestion Program, Perfect Attendance Award, Wellness Program, and Employee Assistance Program. Article XI — Evaluation 11.1 Procedure. The following procedure shall be used to assist in the performance evaluation of the employee: Each employee shall be evaluated at least annually, and each evaluation shall concern an employee's work performance for the entire period since the most recent previous evaluation. The evaluation shall include reference to weaknesses and strengths with specific suggestions for improvement where appropriate and shall be reviewed with the employee. A copy of the evaluation will be placed in the employee's personnel file and a copy will be given to the employee. The employees will be given an opportunity to attach comments to the evaluation for the personnel file. 11.2 Evaluation Appeal. An employee may appeal an evaluation through the Grievance Procedure, Article XVI, but such appeal may not be submitted to arbitration. Article XII - Change in Status 12.1 Definition of Seniority. Seniority shall be defined as total length of service in a bargaining unit position with the City excluding the portion of unpaid extended leaves of absence in excess of thirty (30) calendar days. Unpaid leave means a leave granted pursuant to Article 8.2 and does not include leave in which the City extends benefits such as FMLA leave. 17 Packet Pg. 97 4.4.a 12.2 Promotions and Transfers. Appointment of employees to positions shall be made by the City upon selection of the applicants determined by the City in its sole discretion to be best qualified for the position(s) and after providing adequate opportunity and consideration for transfer and promotion of current employees. At the request of the employee, the City will provide the reasons for non -selection for the open position. Upon promotion an employee shall be placed on the wage scale at the step that provides at least a five percent (5%) per month increase in wages. During the employee's six (6) month probationary period upon his/her promotion to a position within the bargaining unit, an employee may be demoted in the City's discretion and without recourse to the grievance procedure. Upon request by the employee, the City shall inform the employee of the rationale for the demotion. 12.3 Reclassification. Upon reclassification of a position to a higher classification effective after the date of this Agreement, the incumbent employee shall be placed on the wage scale at the step that provides at least a five percent (5%) per month increase in wages. 12.4 Reduction in Force. An employee will receive fifteen (15) working days advance notice of layoff with a copy of such notice to the Union. In the event of a reduction in force, the City shall determine the order of layoff based upon the qualifications, performance evaluations of record, specializations needed for retained positions, and seniority with the union. When these factors are equal, employees shall be laid off in reverse order of seniority. Employees may "bump" or displace to a position in the same or lower pay grade if they meet the minimum qualifications and if their seniority exceeds that of the other employee's in the pay grade. For the purpose of bumping into the municipal court, an employee may bump or displace, if in addition, he/she meets the qualifications for the job and the needs of the court and the Judge. If the Judge in his or her discretion declines to accept the application and an employee who was eligible to bump is laid off due to the Judge's decision, that employee shall be entitled to one month of severance pay. In addition, the City shall pay directly to the insurance provider up to three months of insurance premiums as set forth in Article IX for the employee. Upon receipt of the Official Notice of Reduction in Force that will be mailed to the employee's address on file with the City, the employee will have a period of 10 working days in which to consider employment options. The Official Notice will include information pertaining to the employee's right to displace other employees as outlined in this section. A copy of the Official Notice will be sent to the union. Employees wishing to exercise their displacement rights must provide to the Human Resources Department, a Statement of Intent to Displace within the 10 working day notice period. Along with the Statement of Intent to Displace, the employee must identify a maximum of three positions, listed in priority order, for which they are qualified and for which they have the required level of seniority. The employee must also include a full and complete description of verifiable qualifications for each position identified. 18 Packet Pg. 98 4.4.a The City shall review within five (5) working days, in order, the employee's displacement choices based on their qualifications, performance evaluations of record, specializations and seniority. From this data, the City will determine the position (as high on the priority listings as possible), into which the employee is qualified to bump. Knowledge, skills, and abilities as contained in the current job description of the position in question, shall be the basis from which the determination is made. In cases where qualifications, performance, and union seniority are equal, seniority will be the determining factor. The City shall not lay off bargaining unit employees in lieu of disciplinary action. Employees who are displaced will be provided the same notice and rights as outlined above. If the Department Head and employee mutually agree, the displaced employee may take paid administrative leave for the duration of the 15 working day advance notice period. Employees cannot gain hours through the "bumping" process. In other words, a part time position may not bump a full time position. In addition, employees who currently share a position (job share) can, together, petition to bump into a full time position if they are qualified and meet the required level of seniority. The pay grade of the position bumped into will prevail; however, the employee shall be placed at a step as comparable to their current pay as possible within the pay grade. All displaced employees will be provided an out processing interview to review their benefits and various options as an inactive employee on recall status. Displaced employees will not be allowed to "run out" accrued leave balances but will be paid out in accordance with the union agreement. Employees who move into a new position as a result of this process shall be in a trial status and shall receive written performance evaluations once a month throughout the six month trial period. At the successful completion of the six month trial period, the employee will resume the normal evaluation process as outlined in City policy. Employees, who are unable to satisfactorily perform the duties of the new position, will be subject to termination. 12.5 Rehire. All employees who are laid off in accordance with this procedure shall be placed in a recall pool for up to twenty-four (24) months for recall by seniority in positions for which they are qualified. In the event of a recall, those employees laid off shall be the first to be recalled to fill vacancies in their former positions or any position for which they have bumping rights. All employees on the recall list shall be informed when a position opens. Those employees with the most seniority in the bargaining unit shall be recalled first, provided they can perform the duties required in the classification affected. The names of persons laid off shall be maintained on a recall list. The list will be maintained by the Human Resources Department. For a period of 24 months from the date of layoff, regular employees who were laid off will be placed on the City's job announcement mailing list to assist them in applying for other job vacancies for which they may be qualified. 19 Packet Pg. 99 4.4.a Employees on layoff must keep the City informed of their current address and telephone number so that they may be contacted in a timely fashion. The City will notify employee by certified letter and document efforts to contact employees, and will send copies of all correspondence to the union. If the City is unable to contact the employee within ten consecutive working days from the date of notification, the City's obligation to recall an employee for that position shall cease. From the date of the receipt of a recall notice the employee who has been recalled will have five (5) working days to notify the City of their intent to return to work. Thereafter, the employee shall have 10 working days to report to work unless an extension is granted by the City. If the employee refuses a specific job offer within the 24 month layoff period, he/she shall be removed from the recall list. The City shall have no obligation to recall Employees after they have been on continuous layoff for a period of 24 months. If the individual is hired back within the 24--month layoff period, for purposes of leave accrual and MEBT vesting, an adjusted date will be used that reflects all previous months worked prior to layoff. Employees returning to their same position will have their annual performance evaluation date (anniversary date) adjusted to reflect their time off due to the reduction in force. 12.6 Posting of Vacancies. Position vacancies will be posted in all work locations for a period of five (5) working days. Postings will be longer than five (5) days if possible without delaying the hiring process. Article XIII - Suspension and Discharge 13.1 Probationary Employees. During an employee's first six (6) months' employment with the City within the bargaining unit, an employee may be discharged at the City's discretion and without recourse to the grievance procedure. 13.2 Discipline/Corrective Action. The City agrees that an employee shall be disciplined, including suspension and discharge, only for just cause. The City agrees to follow the principles of progressive discipline. Disciplinary action generally includes the following progressive steps: 1. Oral warning which shall be reduced to writing and noted as an oral warning; 2. Written reprimand; 3. Suspension or demotion; and 4. Discharge A corrective action plan in writing will be provided and discussed at each step of the disciplinary process. This action plan will include clear objectives, expectations and timelines. Coach/Counseling Sessions and oral and written reprimands are deemed to be a means of communicating problems to an employee and are not subject to grievance beyond Step 3 of the 20 Packet Pg. 100 4.4.a grievance procedure. Discipline involving economic impact (suspension, demotion and discharge) may move beyond Step 3 of the grievance process. Disciplinary action will be tailored to the nature and severity of the offense. Management maintains the right to take disciplinary action as they deem appropriate which may include skipping above steps to address severe discipline issues. Records of oral warnings shall be removed from the employee's file in the Human Resources Department after a one (1) year period if no related violations occur. Discipline involving a written reprimand or suspension shall be maintained in the employees official personnel file. The Department of Human Resources shall be the central depositor for all official personnel records and files. Employees shall be provided a copy of all adverse material placed in the official file at the time the material is included in the file. All official personnel records shall be maintained by the Department of Human Resources. 13.3 Written Notice. Upon request by the affected employee, the City will provide the employee in writing the reasons for suspension or discharge. Provided, that the reasons set forth shall not preclude the City from presenting additional evidence of the grounds for the action at any subsequent arbitration hearing. Article XIV -Union Rights 14.1 Union Access. Upon application to the supervisor, the authorized representatives of the Union shall be granted access to the City's premises at any reasonable time for the purpose of adjusting grievances, investigating working conditions, or ascertaining that provisions of this Agreement are being adhered to; provided, that they do not interfere with employees in the performance of their duties. 14.2 Bulletin Boards. The City will make available suitable space in each building for the use of the Union for posting notices of its meetings, elections, recreational and social affairs, reports of Union committees, and rulings and policies of the Union. 14.3 Labor Management Committee The parties shall establish a joint Labor -Management Committee that shall meet on an as needed basis. The Committee shall be composed of an equal number of the Directors/Division Managers and members of the Union. It is understood that the committee shall function in a consultative capacity and shall not be considered a collective bargaining forum, nor a decision making body unless the parties mutually agree to otherwise on a given topic. Either the Union or the City may initiate a discussion on an appropriate topic. Article XV - Rights of Management 15.1 General. It is understood that the City retains its right to manage personnel and operate its Departments except as may be limited by an express provision of this Agreement. This 21 Packet Pg. 101 4.4.a Agreement shall not limit the right of the City to contract for services of any and all types; provided, that no bargaining unit employees lose their employment as a result of the City's decision to contract for services. 15.2 Method of Providing Service. Delivery of municipal services in the most efficient, effective and courteous manner is of paramount importance to the City, and the parties pledge their agreement with the objective of achieving the optimal level of employee performance and efficiency and reasonable working conditions consistent with safety, good health and sustained effort. In order to achieve this goal, the parties hereby recognize the City's right to determine the personnel, the methods, processes and means of providing municipal services, to increase, diminish, or change municipal equipment, including the introduction of any and all new, improved or automated methods or equipment, the assignment of employees to specific jobs within the bargaining unit, and the temporary assignment of employees covered by this Agreement to jobs outside the bargaining unit. Employees temporarily assigned to positions outside the bargaining unit shall retain all benefits and protections provided by this Agreement. 15.3 Performance Standards. The Union recognizes the City's right to establish and/or revise performance standards. Such standards may be used to determine acceptable performance levels, prepare work schedules, and measure the performance of employees. Such performance standards shall be reasonable. 15.4 Article Not Subiect to Grievance Procedure. The exercise of any rights provided in this Article shall not be subject to the grievance procedure unless such exercise is thought to violate the express terms of this Agreement. Article XVI - Work Stoppage The City and the Union agree that the public interest requires the efficient and uninterrupted performance of all City services, and to this end pledge their best efforts to avoid or eliminate any conduct contrary to this objective. During the term of this Agreement, the Union and/or the employees covered by this Agreement shall not cause or engage in any work stoppage, strike, slowdown or other interference with City functions. Employees covered by this Agreement who engage in any of the foregoing actions shall be subject to such disciplinary actions as may be determined by the City. Article XVII - Miscellaneous 17.1 Mileage. All employees who have been authorized to use their own transportation on City business shall be reimbursed at the rate authorized by the Internal Revenue Service for employee mileage. 17.2 Use of Personal Vehicle. No employee shall normally be required to use a personal vehicle on City business. 22 Packet Pg. 102 4.4.a 17.3 Training Program. The City may provide employees release time with pay or compensatory time off to attend training programs that the City determines will be beneficial to their job performance. The City will attempt to provide notice of such training opportunities by posting notice or otherwise providing appropriate notice. If the City requires attendance at such training programs, the City will pay the expenses incurred. 17.4 Conferences. Matters of common concern to the parties concerning the application or interpretation of this Agreement will be the subject of Meet and Confer discussion upon request of either the City or the Union Representative. Such meetings will be scheduled at the mutual convenience of both parties. 17.5 Personnel Files. The employee and/or representative may examine the employee's personnel file in the offices of the Human Resources Ddepartment if the employee so authorizes and releases the City from any obligation for breach of confidentiality in writing. Material placed into the employee's file relating to job performance or personal character shall be brought to his or her attention. The employee may challenge the propriety of including it in the files. If the City refuses to remove the challenged material, the employee shall not have the right to the grievance procedure but the employee shall have the right to insert documentation into the file, providing such documentation is relevant to the challenge. Except as may be required by state or federal laws or regulations, unauthorized persons shall not have access to employee files or other personal data related to their employment. 17.6 Recreation Passes. Employees shall be provided free of charge with weight room, gym, and swimming pool passes to be used during non -working hours. 17.7 Reclassification Requests. It is the supervisor's responsibility to maintain the employee's primary job assignments within the existing job description, until a revised job description is approved. Requests for revised job descriptions can be made by the Department Director to the Human Resources DepartmentOffiae. Revised job descriptions, along with the appropriate pay grade, are subject to the Mayor's approval, before submittal to the Finance Committee and City Council for their approval. 17.8 Drivers License Verification. All employees operating a City of Edmonds vehicle must have a valid Washington State Drivers License (DL). Any employee operating a City of Edmonds vehicle on a suspended or revoked DL is subject to disciplinary action up to and including termination. Article XVIII - Grievance Procedure A grievance shall be defined as an issue raised, relating to the interpretation, application or violation of any terms or provisions of this Agreement 18.1 Grievance Steps. When an employee has a grievance he/she shall bring it to the attention of his/her immediate supervisor, and the employee and supervisor shall attempt to settle 23 Packet Pg. 103 4.4.a the grievance. If the grievance cannot be settled, the employee shall state the grievance in writing and present it to his/her supervisor in accordance with the procedure set forth below: a. Step 1. An employee and/or the Union, within ten (10) working days from the occurrence or knowledge of the occurrence of an alleged grievance (but in no event more than sixty (60) calendar days from the date of occurrence), may bring said grievance to the attention of the immediate supervisor in writing, stating clearly the facts and issues relating to the grievance, the provisions of the Agreement allegedly violated, and the remedy sought. The parties shall attempt to meet and resolve the grievance within ten (10) working days. The immediate supervisor will respond within ten (10) working days of the meeting. b. Step 2. If a satisfactory settlement is not reached in Step One, and the employee wishes to pursue the matter further, said grievance shall be put to writing and referred to the Department Head within ten (10) working days after the decision from Step One. The parties shall attempt to meet to resolve the grievance within ten (10) working days of the date of the written submittal. The Department Head shall rule on the merits of the alleged grievance and respond in writing within ten (10) working days of the meeting. In the event the employee's immediate supervisor is the Department Head, the Mayor or his/her designee shall consider the grievance at this step. c. Step 3. If a satisfactory settlement is not reached at Step Two, the grievant with authorization from the Union may submit the written grievance to the Mayor within ten (10) working days after the decision from Step Two. The parties shall attempt to meet to resolve the grievance within ten (10) working days of the written submittal. Failure of the Mayor or his/her designee to satisfactorily resolve the alleged grievance shall permit the Union the right to submit a demand for arbitration to the City in writing within ten (10) working days of receipt of the response at Step 3 or, failing a response, within ten (10) working days of the date the response was due. d. Selection of Arbitrator. The City and the Union shall immediately thereafter select an arbitrator to hear the dispute. If the City and the Union are not able to agree upon an arbitrator within ten (10) working days after receipt by the City of the written demand for arbitration, the parties shall jointly request a list of eleven (11) arbitrators from the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service (FMCS) The list shall be limited to arbitrators who are members of the National Academy of Arbitrators from Washington and/or Oregon sub -regions. Within ten (10) working days after receipt of same, the parties shall alternately strike the names of the arbitrators until only one name remains, who shall hear the dispute. The party striking first will be the winner of the flip of a coin. e. Authority of the Arbitrator. The Arbitrator shall have no power to render a decision that will add to, subtract from, alter, change, or modify the terms of this Agreement, and his/her power shall be limited to interpretation or application of the express terms of this Agreement, and all other matters shall be excluded from arbitration. The decision of the arbitrator shall be presented in writing, and shall be final and binding upon the parties; provided that the decision does not involve action by the arbitrator beyond his or her jurisdiction. 24 Packet Pg. 104 4.4.a 18.2 Union Assistance. Nothing herein shall prevent an employee from seeking assistance from the Union or the Union from furnishing such assistance at any stage of the grievance procedure. 18.3 Expenses. Each party shall pay the compensation and expenses for its own representatives and witnesses, including attorneys' fees. The parties will share equally the costs and expenses of the arbitrator. 18.4 Time Requirements. If the grievant fails to take the action required within the times provided herein, he/she shall forfeit the right to further protest the grievance, denial of the grievance or interim recommended solution. Failure on the part of the City to respond at Step 1 within the specified time limit shall automatically move the grievance to the next step. 18.5 Conflict Resolution Process Purpose To address and resolve employee conflicts and/or problems in the workplace that are not covered under the scope of a labor agreement, Personnel Policies, or other formal means of grievance resolution. The Conflict Resolution Process (CRP) addresses conflicts between employees and/or supervisors arising from problems involving personal differences, inappropriate behavior, poor communications, or similar reasons. The intent of the CRP process is to resolve poor working relationships, which adversely impact others or services. Process All employees are encouraged to discuss problems they are experiencing with their co-workers or supervisor in an honest and frank manner. Both parties are encouraged to resolve the conflict or problem among themselves in the most fair way, which is mutually acceptable to both parties. If the problem cannot be resolved among the involved parties, the employee may initiate the next step in the CRP process. Step 1. —Any employee with or without the assistance of a representative can initiate the CRP process by providing the other party(s) in the dispute with a written notice containing short statements outlining 1) the problem or conflict, 2) the adverse impact upon the employee, and 3) the remedy sought. A copy of the written notice must also be provided to the other party's supervisor. The other party must respond in writing to the employee within one calendar week with a copy of the response also going to their immediate supervisor. Step 2. If the conflict is not resolved by these actions, the employee shall request in writing for the other parties' supervisor to resolve the issue(s). At the request of either party a mutually agreeable mediator/fact finder will be invited to assist the parties in reaching a mutually agreeable resolution. The expense of the mediator, if any, shall be paid by the City. This action must be taken within two calendar weeks following receipt of the employee's request for resolution of the issue(s). 25 Packet Pg. 105 4.4.a Step 3. If the two parties involved in the dispute are not successful in resolving the issue(s), the supervisor and/or mediator shall prepare a written report outlining the facts presented by both parties involved in the issue along with a recommendation for a fair and equitable resolution to the problem. This report shall be provided to both parties in a confidential manner. Step 4. If the parties have not mutually resolved the issue(s) within one week following receipt of the mediator's report, the report shall be submitted to the Mayor. The Mayor shall review the report and issue a final resolution to the problem, which shall be binding upon all parties, involved in the dispute. The parties shall carry out the Mayor's directive in a cooperative manner. Retaliatory action from either party is strictly prohibited. Step 5. A follow-up action will be conducted by the Human Resources DepartmentO€fi-ee, after forty-five (45) days to insure compliance with the Mayor's resolution. A written follow-up report will be provided to all parties involved, including the Mayor. Article XIX - Entire Agreement The Agreement expressed herein in writing constitutes the entire Agreement between the parties. The parties acknowledge that each has had the unlimited right and opportunity to make demands and proposals with respect to any matter deemed a proper subject for collective bargaining. The results of the exercise of that right are set forth in this Agreement. Therefore, except as otherwise provided in this Agreement, each voluntarily and unqualifiedly agrees to waive the right to oblige the other party to bargain with respect to any subject or matter not specifically referred to or covered in this Agreement. Article XX - Savings Clause Should any part hereof or any provision herein contained be rendered or declared invalid by reason of any existing or subsequently enacted legislation, ordinance, or by any decree of a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidation of such part or portion of this Agreement shall not invalidate the remaining portions hereof, provided, however, upon such invalidation that parties mutually agree to meet and negotiate such parts or provisions affected. The remaining parts or provisions shall remain in full force and effect. Article XXI - Term of Agreement This Agreement shall become effective upon January 1, 2018-5 and shall remain in effect until December 31, 20204-7. EDMONDS EMPLOYEE ASSOCIATION, LOCAL 3517 CITY OF EDMONDS (AFSCME COUNCIL 2) By 26 Packet Pg. 106 4.4.a Date MIT Organizer/Representative David O. Earling, Mayor Date Bargaining Team Member ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: Bargaining Team Member Scott Passey, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Bargaining Team Membu Office of the City Attorney APPENDIX "A" 1. RATES OF PAY, EFFECTIVE: NE 14 5690 5804 6095 6399 6-7-22 7057 NE 13 5367 5476 5746 6035 63K 665-3, rrr� 54-� 52�9 5543 5� 64-0 6445 rT� 54-M 5217 5499 57-6-3. FBI 63-55-3 NE 12 502t 5 -24 53-92 5650 5932 62M rT� 49 -7 5026 52-79 5543 5K0 &W9 rT� 47--Lg 483 3 50-76 5338 55-% 5P4 rT� 44W 4574 4904 5042 5293 5551 NE 42-P 4N0 4544 47-N 497-9 5229 NE 8 3w-� 406-2 424 4479 4703 4939 NE 377-2 349 4 4N 4244 44 S6 4�5 NE 6 3542 364-5 379-3 3983 4"4 43Q N5 3334 34-02 356.9 37-49 393-5 443-2 NE 4 3455 324-9 33,� 3549 31� 39� NE 3 2989 3450 32-4 334 3334 37-P NE 2 2S4-3 2S-73 384-4 34-64 3349 34" 27 Packet Pg. 107 4.4.a January 1, 2018 2018 PAY STEP I STEP II STEP III STEP IV STEP V STEP VI NE-14 I 6121 6244 6557 6885 7232 7592 NE-13 5774 5892 6182 6492 6812 7157 NE-12** 5568 5678 5964 6260 6573 6901 NE-12* 5515 5624 5905 6200 6510 6835 NE-12 5408 5513 5790 6078 6382 6700 NE-11* 5300 5408 5679 5964 6261 6572 NE-11 5097 5199 5461 5734 6020 6319 NE-10 4819 4920 5169 5424 5694 5980 NE-9 4537 4626 4856 5099 5356 5626 NE-8 4283 4370 4588 4817 5059 5314 NE-7 4058 j 4141 4346 1 4566 4794 5029 NE-6 3811 j 3889 4081 4285 4501 4725 NE-5 3583 3660 3839 4033 4233 4445 NE-4 3394 3462 3633 3818 4009 4211 NE-3 3215 3282 3443 3616 3799 3988 NE -2 3026 3091 3242 3404 3571 3750 S02 17.46 17.83 18.70 19.64 20.60 21.64 u L r 0 V O N O N O T- 0 N N 0 v w 2 U U) w Q ti u) M 0 J C 0 ca 0 CD N a 0 a E w c 0 w J Q Z M a6 cc N O om 0 L a U O N O N O O N C N E t V 2 r Q 28 Packet Pg. 108 4.4.a January 1, 2019 2019 S blhiI_ NE-14 6305 6431 6754 7092 7449 7820 NE-13 5947 6069 6367 6687 7016 7372 NE-12** 5735 5848 6143 6448 6770 7108 NE-12* 5680 5793 6082 6386 6705 7040 NE-12 5570 5678 5963 6260 6573 6901 NE-11* 5459 5570 5849 6143 6449 6769 NE-11 5250 5355 5625 5906 6201 6509 NE-10 4964 5068 5324 5587 5865 6159 NE-9 4673 4765 5002 5251 5517 5795 NE-8 4411 4501 4725 4962 5211 5473 NE-7 4180 4265 4476 4703 4938 5180 NE-6 3925 4006 4203 4414 4636 4867 NE-5 3690 3770 3954 4154 4360 4579 NE-4 3496 3566 3742 3933 4129 4337 NE-3 3311 3380 3546 3724 3913 4108 NE-2 3117 3184 3339 3506 3678 3863 Sot 17.98 18.36 19.26 20.23 21.22 22.29 2w Market Rate Adjustments r�:��r . r rrssssrs�:reers:e�see�aserssr�:Eess. _ 29 Packet Pg. 109 4.4.a A.1 Wages As this is the initial collective bargaining agreement between the City and the Union, the parties entered into an interim agreement that the wages paid for work performed between the expiration of the prior Collective Bargaining_Agreement on December 31, 2017 and the ratification of this Agreement would not be considered to be full compensation for that work. Therefore, the wage increases set forth below take into account that the City will be makingto o employees the necessary retroactive payment for wage increases during that time period. Wage increases for 2018 e ff tive upon ratification` 5, 20196, and 20204-7 for all EDMONDS EMPLOYEE ASSOCIATION, LOCAL 3517 (AFSCME COUNCIL 2)SE4 employees employed by the city on the final date of ratification by both parties, will be as follows_. Ef ,eetive ratifleatienisAgeemen*T ' , 2045, Tthe monthly rates of pay for each classification covered by this Agreement for 2018 shall be increased over the 2017 rates by-lby three percent (3.1 %). ner-e-a3ed rates are reneeted inrthe —above Rat f Pay, E eetiv 1, 2015"). one thetis Effective January 1. 2019. the monthlv rates of nav for each classification covered by this Agreement shall be increased by one hundred percent (100%) of the percentage increase in the Seattle -Tacoma -Bellevue Area Consumer Price Index semi-annual average from June to June of the previous year, with a minimum increase three percent (3.0%) and a maximum increase of three percent (3.0%). The Index used shall be the Consumer Price Index for Urban Consumers (CPI-U). All Items Indexes. Revised Series (1982-84+100) for the Seattle -Tacoma -Bellevue area. as published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Effective January 1. 2020. the monthlv rates of nav for each classification covered by this Agreement shall be increased by shall be increased by one hundred percent (100%) of the percentage increase in the Seattle -Tacoma -Bellevue Area Consumer Price Index semi-annual average from June to June of the previous year, with a minimum increase three percent (3.0%) and a maximum increase of three percent (3.0%). The Index used shall be the Consumer Price Index for Urban Consumers (CPI-U). All Items Indexes. Revised Series (1982-84+100) for the Seattle -Tacoma -Bellevue area, as published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Any retroactive wage payment will be made to each member of the bargaining unit in separate check. A.2 Wage Step Advancement. Step advancement shall be based upon completion of the applicable length of service and satisfactory performance. If the completion of such period of time occurs at other than the beginning of a semi-monthly pay period, the advancement to the new pay step shall become effective at the beginning of the next semi-monthly pay period. 30 Packet Pg. 110 4.4.a The normal orientation period is six (6) months from the employee's date of hire, rehire or promotion. The Ma., o�y authorize the department director to extend the orientation period for up to an additional six (6) months. An extension maegranted due to circumstances such as an extended illness or a continued need to evaluate an employee. Extensions for represented employees also require concurrence with the Union. After successful completion of the six (6) month probationary trial period, an employee shall receive a step increase of one step not to exceed the maximum of the negotiated pay grade table. The completion of probation establishes the anniversary date used for future performance evaluations and/or step increases. The City shall have the right to place an employee in any pay STEP above the minimum set forth herein, in which event, advancement of said employee to each of the next higher pay STEPS shall be governed by this section A.2. The six (6) month probationary STEP increase shall apply regardless of the STEP in which the employee is initially placed. A.3 Provision of Tools, Clothing and Safety Equipment. Any boots to be worn by employees shall be purchased by the employees upon their initial hiring. Thereafter, engineer inspector, engineering technician, engineering aide, senior construction inspector, building inspector, combination inspector, senior combination building inspector, plans examiner, senior plans examiner, stormwater technician, and code enforcement officer will receive up to one hundred and seventy five dollars ($1752-0.00) per year for replacement of boots if necessary. Thereafter the allowance will be increased by the Consumer Price Index as calculated in Section A.1 and rounded to the nearest dollar. The City will provide rubber boots for the aquatics/athletic coordinator. Any raingear and/or uniform necessary shall be provided on a department basis and used by employees as needed. A.4 Position Classification Schedule Position Title Pay Grade Senior Combination Building Inspector NE-14 Accountant NE-14 Financial Analyst NE-14 Financial Manager — Public Works NE- 14 GIS Analyst NE-14 Recreation Coordinator Environmental Education & Sustainability Coordinator IT Network Specialist Engineering Technician III IT Systems Specialist Senior Plans Examiner Community Services Program Coordinator Combination Building Inspector Plans Examiner Code Enforcement Officer NE-13 NE-13 NE-13 NE-13 NE 13 NE 13 NE-12 NE-12** NE-12* NE-12 31 Packet Pg. 111 4.4.a Building Inspector NE-11 * Senior Permit Coordinator NE-11 PC Support Technician NE-11 Engineering Technician II NE-11 Stormwater Technician NE-11 Executive Assistant- Public Works NE-10 Executive Assistant — Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services NE-10 Office Coordinator NE-10 Probation Officer NE -10 Engineering Technician I NE-10 Permit Coordinator NE-09 Administrative Assistant (Development Services) NE-09 Administrative Assistant NE-09 Deputy City Clerk NE-09 Lead Court Clerk NE-09 Accounting Specialist NE-09 Part -Time IT Assistant NE-09 Permit Coordinator I NE-07 Business License Clerk NE-07 Court Clerk NE-07 Senior Office Specialist NE-06 Office Assistant NE-04 Recreation Leader NE-02 A.5 — Longevity Pay Based on total length of service in a bargaining unit position, employees shall receive, in addition to their monthly rate of pay set forth in Appendix A., monthly Longevity Pay in accordance with the following: Seniori 5 years I Oyears 14 years 18 years 25 years Longevity Pay 0.5% of employee's monthly rate of pay 1.0% of employee's monthly rate of pay 1.5% of employee's monthly rate of pay 2.0% of employee's monthly rate of pay 2.5% of employee's monthly rate of pay 32 Packet Pg. 112 4.4.a LETTER OF INTENT by and between CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON AND EDMONDS EMPLOYEE ASSOCIATION, LOCAL 3517 (AFSCME COUNCIL 2) THIS LETTER OF INTENT is by and between the CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON (the "City") and EDMONDS EMPLOYEE ASSOCIATION, LOCAL 3517 (AFSCME COUNCIL 2) It is understood and agreed by and between the City and Edmonds Employee Association, Local 3517 (AFSCME Council 2) as follows: WHEREAS, the City and Edmonds Employee Association, Local 3517 (AFSCME Council 2), as a result of the collective bargaining process, have ratified a Collective Bargaining Agreement ("CBA") that will be in effect for the period of January 1, 2018-7 through December 31, 2020; and WHEREAS, as part of the collective bargaining process, the parties agreed to the following provision: 4.2 Working Out of Classification. An employee assigned by a supervisor, in writing, or has in the course of regular duties to have assumed all the duties of a higher classification for a period of four (4) or more consecutive working days, or performs said duties in a greater than %2 FTE (full time equivalent) basis for more than one pay period, shall during the period of that assignment be placed at the step on the wage scale of the higher classification that provides an increase over the employee's regular rate of pay of at least five percent (5%). This shall include work out of classification to cover for another employee's scheduled vacation. Seniority shall be a consideration when assigning employees to work out of classification. With regard to working out of class; and WHEREAS, the City and EDMONDS EMPLOYEE ASSOCIATION, LOCAL 3517 (AFSCME COUNCIL 2) agree that the above language does not contemplate an employee acting out of class in a supervisory position that is not an EDMONDS EMPLOYEE ASSOCIATION, LOCAL 3517 (AFSCME COUNCIL 2) position; and 33 Packet Pg. 113 4.4.a WHEREAS, the City and EDMONDS EMPLOYEE ASSOCIATION, LOCAL 3517 (AFSCME COUNCIL 2) agree that it is appropriate for the City to pay the Deputy City Clerk positon, a higher acting out of class premium for undertaking a portion of the duties of the Clerk Clerk, which is a supervisory position that is not an EDMONDS EMPLOYEE ASSOCIATION, LOCAL 3517 (AFSCME COUNCIL 2) position, during the City Clerk's leave; NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual benefits to be derived, the City and EDMONDS EMPLOYEE ASSOCIATION, LOCAL 3517 (AFSCME COUNCIL 2) hereby agree as follows: Should the Deputy City Clerk be assigned to work out of class ("acting out of class") for the City for a period of at least four (4) work days and up to nine (9) consecutive work days, the Deputy City Clerk position will be paid the additional 10% increase over her regular rate of pay for this period of time that the Deputy City Clerk position is working out of class as the City Clerk. This agreement does not set a precedent for future requests for increased acting out of class pay for the Deputy City Clerk position or any other employee who is required to temporarily undertake supervisory duties in a non -union position. This Letter of Intent is effective upon the signature of the CBAeontr-aet by both parties. 34 Packet Pg. 114 4.4.a LETTER OF INTENT by and between CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON AND EDMONDS EMPLOYEE ASSOCIATION, LOCAL 3517 (AFSCME COUNCIL 2) THIS LETTER OF INTENT is by and between the CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON (the "City") and SEPWIGE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION DMONDS EMPLOYEE ASSOCIATION, LOCAL 3517 (AFSCME COUNCIL 21, LOCAL 25 ("EDMONDS EMPLOYEE ASSOCIATION, LOCAL 3517 (AFSCME COUNCIL 2)"). It is understood and agreed by and between the City and EDMONDS EMPLOYEE ASSOCIATION, LOCAL 3517 (AFSCME COUNCIL 2) as follows: WHEREAS, the City and EDMONDS EMPLOYEE ASSOCIATION, LOCAL 3517 (AFSCME COUNCIL 2), as a result of the collective bargaining process, have ratified a Collective Bargaining Agreement ("CBA") that will be in effect for the period of January 1, 20184-5 through December 31, 20204-7; and WHEREAS, as part of the collective bargaining process, the parties agreed to the following provision: 4.2 Working Out of Classification. An employee assigned by a supervisor, in writing, or has in the course of regular duties to have assumed all the duties of a higher classification for a period of four (4) or more consecutive working days, or performs said duties in a greater than %2 FTE (full time equivalent) basis for more than one pay period, shall during the period of that assignment be placed at the step on the wage scale of the higher classification that provides an increase over the employee's regular rate of pay of at least five percent (5%). This shall include work out of classification to cover for another employee's scheduled vacation. Seniority shall be a consideration when assigning employees to work out of classification. With regard to working out of class; and WHEREAS, the City and EDMONDS EMPLOYEE ASSOCIATION, LOCAL 3517 (AFSCME COUNCIL 2) agree that the above language does not contemplate an employee acting out of class in a supervisory position that is not an EDMONDS EMPLOYEE ASSOCIATION, LOCAL 3517 (AFSCME COUNCIL 2) position; NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual benefits to be derived, the City and EDMONDS EMPLOYEE ASSOCIATION, LOCAL 3517 (AFSCME COUNCIL 2) hereby agree as follows: Should the Lead Court Clerk be assigned to work out of class ("acting out of class") for the Court Administrator for a period of at least four (4) work days and up to nine (9) consecutive work days, the Lead Court Clerk position will be paid the additional 10% increase over his/her regular rate of pay for this period of time that the Lead Court Clerk position is working out of class. 35 Packet Pg. 115 4.4.a This agreement does not set a precedent for future requests for increased acting out of class pay for the Lead Court Clerk or any other employee who is required to temporarily undertake supervisory duties in a non -union position. This Letter of Intent is effective upon the signature of the CBAeontraet by both parties. 36 Packet Pg. 116 4.4.a Memorandum of Understanding Amended to the AGREEMENT by and between CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON and EDMONDS EMPLOYEE ASSOCIATION, LOCAL 3517 (AFSCME COUNCIL 2) Effective January 1, 2018-7 THIS AMENDMENT is supplemental to the AGREEMENT by and between the CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON (hereinafter the "City") and the SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION-, ION LOCAL 2-5EDMONDS EMPLOYEE ASSOCIATION, LOCAL 3517 (AFSCME COUNCIL 2) (hereinafter "EDMONDS EMPLOYEE ASSOCIATION, LOCAL 3517 (AFSCME COUNCIL 2)"). WHEREAS, the parties have ratified a Collective Bargaining Agreement (hereinafter "CBA") effective January 1, 2018-5 through December 31, 20204-7; and WHEREAS, Section 1.1 of the CBA provides that employees covered by the CBA include "All regular full- and part-time clerical, professional and technical employees regularly scheduled for twenty (20) or more hours per week as listed by position in Appendix `A"'; and WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to a change in the working hours of one of the positions currently on the EDMONDS EMPLOYEE ASSOCIATION, LOCAL 3517 (AFSCME COUNCIL 2) classification schedule to reduce them below twenty (20) hours per week; NOW THEREFORE, the City and EDMONDS EMPLOYEE ASSOCIATION, LOCAL 3517 (AFSCME COUNCIL 2) have entered into this Memorandum of Understanding to memorialize the following agreement: The parties will reduce the weekly working hours for one part-time Administrative Assistant position ("Administrative Assistant — Development Services"), which currently has working hours of twenty (20) hours per week, to sixteen (16) hours per week. The remaining four (4) hours per week will be covered by another EDMONDS EMPLOYEE ASSOCIATION, LOCAL 3517 (AFSCME COUNCIL 2) Administrative Assistant position. The job description for this position will remain as it currently is for the "Administrative Assistant — Development Services" position, and it will remain covered by the CBA. The benefits available to this position will be reduced pursuant to the City Personnel Policies. Should there be a change in circumstances that would necessitate increasing the hours of this position to twenty (20) hours per week, the City maintains the right to increase the hours (that have been temporarily reduced from twenty (20) to sixteen (16) as needed. At that point, this MOU would become null and void and the position would be covered by the normal (existing) terms of the CBA. 37 Packet Pg. 117 4.4.a The parties agree that this Memorandum of Understanding is specific to this EDMONDS EMPLOYEE ASSOCIATION, LOCAL 3517 (AFSCME COUNCIL 2) position only and does not set a precedent for future requests for changes in working hours for covered EDMONDS EMPLOYEE ASSOCIATION, LOCAL 3517 (AFSCME COUNCIL 2) positions. This Memorandum of Understanding is effective upon the signature of the CBAeontr-aet by both parties 38 Packet Pg. 118 4.4.a Memorandum of Understandiniz Amended to the AGREEMENT by and between CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON and EDMONDS EMPLOYEE ASSOCIATION, LOCAL 3517 (AFSCME COUNCIL 2) Effective January 1, 2018 THIS AMENDMENT is supplemental to the AGREEMENT by and between the CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON (hereinafter the "City") and the EDMONDS EMPLOYEE ASSOCIATION, LOCAL 3517 (AFSCME COUNCIL 2) (hereinafter "EDMONDS EMPLOYEE ASSOCIATION, LOCAL 3517 (AFSCME COUNCIL 2)"). WHEREAS, the parties have ratified a Collective Bargaining Agreement (hereinafter "CBAO effective January 1, 2018 through December 31, 2020; and WHEREAS, Section ''.'�7.1.6 of the CBA provides that employees covered by the CBA who maintain a good attendance record shall be eligible for the following incentive for the corresponding annual sick leave usage: Hrs of sick leave used Hrs of vacation earned Hrs of sick leave used Hrs of vacation earned 0 24 13 11 1 23 14 10 2 22 15 9 3 21 16 8 4 20 17 7 5 19 18 6 6 18 19 5 7 17 20 4 8 16 21 3 9 15 22 2 10 14 23 1 11 13 24 0 12 12 And that the uUse of the earned annual leave days shall be in the vear followinff the vear the emnlovee's attendance record has been established. Sick leave absences due to an accepted State Worker's Compensation illness or injury as well as sick leave absences due to Family Medical Leave, shall not be taken into consideration when applyingthe he eligibility standards. Partial hours of sick leave .5 or above will be rounded to the next highest whole number and partial hours of sick leave below .5 will be rounded to the next lower whole number for calculating vacation hours earned; and- m L c 0 0 N O N 00 T 0 N N c 0 U w c� Cn U. Q Ln M O 0 J C O m 0 Q a� a� 0 0. E w N c 0 E w J Q z as to m 0 0 O. 0 a` t� 0 N O N 00 T 0 N c d E z 0 r Q 39 Packet Pg. 119 4.4.a m L WHEREAS, under RCW 49.46.210 (Paid sick leave — Authorized purposes — Limitations- c "Family member" defined) the Washington State Department of Labor and Industries has interpreted V 0 RCW 49.46.210 as rendering unlawful any_programs that discourage employees from using sick leave; N N and 00 T 0 N WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to remove (suspend) the sick leave incentive provision of ci the contract imiwaaee of this seetion-until there is either a change in RCW 49.46.210 to permit theses use of a sick leave incentive program, or until such time that a court of competent jurisdiction should 'o determine that such a program is lawful; v w c� NOW THEREFORE, the City and EDMONDS EMPLOYEE ASSOCIATION, LOCAL 3517 Cn (AFSCME COUNCIL 2) have entered into this Memorandum of Understanding to memorialize the Q following agreement: Ln O The parties agree to suspend the provisions of the Sick Leave Incentive program, as described in 7.1.6 of c the parties 2015-2017 collective bargaining agreement, effective uJpon ratification of this agreement. i CF However these provisions shall be reinstated in the event that either: (a) there is a change in RCW 2 49.46.210 to permit the use of a sick leave incentive program; or (b) a court of competent jurisdiction O fflesdetermines that such programs are lawful. N Q a� Additionally, for those employees in the bargaining_unittl that would have met the "good attendance" o record in 2018, under the pEtyjgjg=removed article 7.1.6 (Sick Leave Incentive) in the 2015-2017 & collective bar ining agreement, they will each receive the monetary value of the amount of vacation that w ga they would have received in vacation accrual instead paid out to them upon ratification of the contract. -a c O E This Memorandum of Understanding is effective upon the signature of the CBAeon#act by both parties. w J Q Z CD T T to N O 0. O L a t� 0 N O N 00 T 0 N C 0) E t t) r r Q 40 Packet Pg. 120 4.4.b AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON AND EDMONDS EMPLOYEE ASSOCIATION, LOCAL 3517 (AFSCME COUNCIL 2) January 1, 2018, through December 31, 2020 Packet Pg. 121 4.4.b AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON AND EDMONDS EMPLOYEE ASSOCIATION, LOCAL 3517 (AFSCME COUNCIL 2) January 1, 2018, through December 31, 2020 ARTICLE SUBJECT PAGE ARTICLE I RECOGNITION, UNION MEMBERSHIP AND PAYROLL DEDUCTION 3 ARTICLE II HOURS OF WORK 4 ARTICLE III OVERTIME 5 ARTICLE IV POSITION CLASSIFICATIONS, RATES OF PAY AND 6 NON-DISCRIMINATION ARTICLE V HOLIDAYS 7 ARTICLE VI VACATION 8 ARTICLE VII LEAVES WITH PAY 9 ARTICLE VIII OTHER LEAVES OF ABSENCE 12 ARTICLE IX HEALTH AND WELFARE 13 ARTICLE X JOB SHARE 14 ARTICLE XI EVALUATION 15 ARTICLE XII CHANGE IN STATUS 16 ARTICLE XIII SUSPENSION AND DISCHARGE 18 ARTICLE XIV UNION RIGHTS 19 ARTICLE XV RIGHTS OF MANAGEMENT 20 ARTICLE XVI WORK STOPPAGE 21 ARTICLE XVII MISCELLANEOUS 21 ARTICLE XVIII GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE 22 ARTICLE XIX ENTIRE AGREEMENT 24 ARTICLE XX SAVINGS CLAUSE 25 ARTICLE XXI TERM OF AGREEMENT 25 APPENDIX "A" 26 2 Packet Pg. 122 4.4.b AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON AND EDMONDS EMPLOYEE ASSOCIATION, LOCAL 3517 (AFSCME COUNCIL 2) January 1, 2018 through December 31, 2020 THIS AGREEMENT is between the CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON (hereinafter called the City or the Employer) and the EDMONDS EMPLOYEE ASSOCIATION, LOCAL 3517 (AFSCME COUNCIL 2) (hereinafter called the Union) for the purpose of setting forth the agreement between the parties re: wages, hours, and conditions of employment of those employees for whom the City has recognized the Union as the exclusive collective bargaining representative. The parties agree that all usage of male pronouns refer to both male and female employees and is in no way intended to discriminate against nor exclude female employees. Article I - Recognition, Union Membership and Payroll Deduction 1.1 Recognition. The City recognizes the Union as the exclusive bargaining agent for the following described employees as certified by the Public Employment Relations Commission in case number 3259-E-81-030, and the City agrees that the Union shall be said employees' representative for the management of this Agreement: INCLUDED: All regular full- and part-time clerical, professional and technical employees regularly scheduled for twenty (20) or more hours per week as listed by position in Appendix "A". Note: The list of Job Titles in Section A.3 in no way limits the number of job titles which may be included within the bargaining unit. EXCLUDED: All positions contained in other bargaining units, including public works shop and field laborers, custodial and service positions and parks maintenance laborers; Police Department; Executive Assistant; Council Executive Assistant; Office Administrators; Human Resources Department; City Clerk; supervisory, professional, and management; and confidential employees as described under the Act; temporary or interim -funded positions. 1.2 Union Membership. The Union agrees to represent all employees in the bargaining unit regardless of membership or non -membership status. 1.3 Payroll Deduction. The City agrees to deduct monthly Union dues uniformly levied against Union members who have authorized such deductions in writing in accordance with applicable law, and to transfer such amounts to the Union. Written authorization for payroll deduction is valid whether executed in hard copy or electronically. The City shall provide an electronic copy of any written authorization for payroll deduction to the Union via email within ten (10) days of the employee executing such authorization. The City also agrees to deduct from the paycheck of those employees that have submitted written authorization contributions to P.E.O.P.L.E. and transmit same to the Union. No deduction shall be made which is prohibited by 3 Packet Pg. 123 4.4.b applicable law. The Union will indemnify, defend and hold the City harmless against any claims made and against any suit instituted against the City which may arise by reason of any action taken by the Employer to comply with the provisions of this Article, including reimbursement for any legal fees or expenses incurred in connection with such action. The Employer will promptly notify the Union in writing of any claim, demand, suit or other form of liability asserted against it relating to its implementation of this Article. If requested by the Union in writing, the Employer will surrender any such claim, demand, suit or other form of liability to the Union for defense and resolution. The Union agrees to refund to the City any amounts paid to it in error upon presentation of proper evidence thereof. The Employer shall honor the terms and conditions of each employee's authorization for payroll deduction. Whether an employee is a union member or not, the Employer shall continue to deduct and remit Union dues and fees to the Union until such time as the Union notifies the Employer that the dues authorization has been properly terminated in compliance with the payroll deduction authorization executed by the employee. Every effort will be made to end the deduction effective on the first payroll, but not later than the second payroll of the Employer's receipt of the Employee's written notice. 1.4 Pertinent Information. The Union will be provided with pertinent information regarding new vacancies, new appointments, or termination in positions within the bargaining unit. Pertinent information includes position titles, descriptions, salary ranges, and dates of appointments or terminations of employees within the bargaining unit. 1.5 New Employee Orientation. A Union official shall, at no loss of pay, be granted up to thirty (30) minutes to provide the new employee a basic overview of the employee's rights and responsibilities regarding Union membership, dues authorizations, and Union insurance. Article II - Hours of Work 2.1 Standard Work Week. The standard work week shall be five (5) consecutive work days of eight (8) hours each or four (4) consecutive work days of ten (10) hours each. The standard work week shall be forty (40) hours per week and shall normally be scheduled Monday through Friday. The working hours of each day shall be normally between 7:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. with the exception of employees in the Parks and Recreation Department whose working hours may be adjusted to include up to two (2) evenings per week for each employee. In any event, the total hours worked shall not exceed forty (40) hours per week unless overtime is paid or compensatory time is earned. Other schedules may be established by mutual agreement of the employee and City. Rates of pay for work other than during the standard workweek shall be as provided in Article III - Overtime. It is further recognized that 9/80 schedules may not be feasible for every department and must be approved by the department head. 2.2 Schedule Change. Normally, at least seven (7) calendar days advance notice shall be given the employee prior to the commencement of a schedule change, except in the case where emergency operations cannot be anticipated. 2.3 Lunch and Breaks. A lunch period of between one half (1 /2) hour and one (1) hour for each employee shall be scheduled approximately midway through the workday. Each employee 4 Packet Pg. 124 4.4.b shall receive a 15 minute paid relief period approximately midway of both the morning and the afternoon shift. Lunch shall be considered the employees' own time and may normally be taken away from the City's premises. 2.4 Flexible Hours. If scheduled at least seven (7) calendar days in advance, the hours of employees may be adjusted to include evening hours, provided the employee is given the option to adjust her/his hours for any one (1) day of the work week so that the total hours worked is not in excess of forty (40) hours, subject to Section 2.1. If the employee is not given seven (7) calendar days' notice, all time worked after six p.m. shall be compensated at the overtime rate or by time and one-half compensatory time. 2.5 Shift Differential. Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 2.1 Standard Work Week, the standard work week for the position of Senior Office Specialist in Parks and Recreation may be established to five (5) consecutive days, Monday through Friday, from 12:00 p.m. until 9:00 p.m. and shall be compensated five percent (5%) per hour in addition to their regular hourly rate of pay for all hours worked after 5 p.m. Article III - Overtime 3.1 General. Overtime cash payment or compensatory time off by mutual agreement between the City and the employee, at one and one-half (1-1/2) times the overtime worked, at the regular hourly rate of the employee's salary, shall be earned for time worked beyond the 40 hour work week established by 2.1. A minimum of one -quarter (1/4) hour's overtime payment or compensatory time off shall be earned when required to work beyond the scheduled work week. After the first one -quarter (1/4) hour, each one -quarter (1/4) hour or major portion thereof shall be compensated. Overtime shall be recognized only upon prior approval of the employee's supervisor or department head. 3.2 Callback. A minimum of three (3) hours at one and one- half (1-1/2) times the employee's regular hourly rate shall be earned for callbacks. Time worked beyond the minimum shall be compensated at one and one-half (1-1/2) times the actual time worked in one -quarter (1/4) hour increments for each one -quarter (1/4) hour or major portion thereof. 3.3 Compensatory Time. Employees shall have the right to convert compensatory time off to an overtime cash payment by making a written request on the employee's timesheet. Compensatory time may be taken with the approval of the supervisor or at the direction of the supervisor, provided the employee is given ten (10) working days' notice. 5 Packet Pg. 125 4.4.b Article IV - Position Classifications, Rates of Pay and Non -Discrimination 4.1 Position Classifications and Pay Grades. The classifications of positions covered by this Agreement and the corresponding rates of pay shall be as set forth in Appendix "A" which is attached hereto and made a part of this Agreement. These rates of pay shall be regarded as contractual minimum rates. 4.2 Working Out of Classification. An employee assigned by a supervisor, in writing, or has in the course of regular duties to have assumed all the duties of a higher classification for a period of four (4) or more consecutive working days, or performs said duties in a greater than 1/2 FTE (full time equivalent) basis for more than one pay period, shall during the period of that assignment be placed at the step on the wage scale of the higher classification that provides an increase over the employee's regular rate of pay of at least five percent (5%). This shall include work out of classification to cover for another employee's scheduled vacation. Seniority shall be a consideration when assigning employees to work out of classification. 4.3 No Pyramiding. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, premium or overtime pay shall not be duplicated or pyramided. In no case shall premium or overtime pay be based on other than the employee's regular straight time rate of pay to the extent permitted by FLSA. 4.4 Job Descriptions. The duties, responsibilities, and qualifications of positions shall be contained in Job Descriptions of the Classification Plan. Copies of said descriptions and revisions thereto shall be provided to the Union and the affected employee(s). The creation and revision of job descriptions shall be a management prerogative. However, an employee may request a review of his/her job description. The Human Resources Director shall confer with the supervisor and the affected employee(s) to review the recommendations and suggestions. The Human Resources Director shall record the summary of reasons for revising or not revising the job description and provide a copy to the requesting employee within sixty (60) days of the request. Provided, the review shall not be subject to appeal through the grievance procedure. 4.5 New Job Classifications. Should it become necessary to establish a new job classification within the bargaining unit during the term of this Agreement, the City may designate a job classification title and salary for the classification. The salary for any new classification within the bargaining unit shall become subject to negotiation at such time as the salaries for the subsequent contract year are negotiated or take effect. 4.6 Non -Discrimination. The City and the Union agree those statutory requirements and obligations concerning equal employment opportunities, affirmative action, and all other applicable anti -discrimination state and federal laws and regulations shall be adhered to. Complaints of discrimination under this section shall be subject to the grievance procedure but shall not be subject to arbitration. 6 Packet Pg. 126 4.4.b No employee shall be discriminated against, and their employment security will not be threatened, for upholding the provisions of this Agreement or seeking the enforcement of their right to nondiscrimination through an appropriate government agency. Article V - Holidays 5.1 Designation of Holidays. The following shall be considered paid holidays for full-time employees. Part-time employees regularly working twenty (20) hours per week or more shall receive prorated compensation for the following holidays, based on their regularly scheduled hours. New Year's Day Martin Luther King, Jr. Day President's Day Memorial Day Independence Day Labor Day Veteran's Day Thanksgiving Day Friday following Thanksgiving Day Day before Christmas Day Christmas Day January 1 Third Monday of January Third Monday of February The Last Monday in May July 4 First Monday of September November 11 Fourth Thursday of November December 24 December 25 A floating holiday will be given to each full time employee (pro -rated for part time regular employees) after six consecutive months of employment. The floating holiday shall not be carried over into the next calendar year. In the event of termination before June 30, an employee who has completed six (6) months of employment shall be paid for one-half of that year's floating holiday, if unused. If termination is after June 30, an employee who has completed six (6) months of employment shall be given full payment for the floating holiday, if unused. If Christmas Day or the day before Christmas falls on a weekend day, an alternative workday will be selected provided the employee gets four consecutive days off. Holiday time shall be considered time worked when computing overtime. If a holiday falls on a Saturday, the preceding Friday will be observed as the holiday. If a holiday falls on a Sunday, Monday will be observed as the holiday. 7 Packet Pg. 127 4.4.b 5.2 Holiday Pay. Eligible full-time employees will receive eight (8) hours of pay at their straight -time rate for each holiday. Part-time employees will receive holiday pay on a prorated basis. Employees are eligible for holiday pay if they are in paid status on the regular business day preceding the holiday. Employees whose employment is terminated immediately prior to a holiday are not entitled to holiday pay. Employees who are normally scheduled to work more than eight (8) hours on a day observed as a holiday may use vacation leave, compensatory time, or leave without pay to make up the difference between the employee's normally scheduled shift and the eight (8) hours of holiday pay. An employee assigned to work on any holiday shall be compensated at the overtime rate of pay in addition to the holiday pay, with a minimum guarantee of four (4) hours pay. 5.3 Four Day Per Week Employees. When a holiday falls on a four -day per week, or 9/80, employee's scheduled day off, an extra day of holiday with pay will be granted in lieu thereof. Article VI - Vacation 6.1 General. Employees covered by this Agreement shall accrue vacation leave with pay depending on the length of continuous service with the City. Part-time employees regularly working twenty (20) hours or more per week shall accrue vacation leave on a prorated basis. 6.2 Accrual. Full-time employees shall accrue the following amount of vacation time with pay, depending on the length of continuous service with the City: YEARS OF EMPLOYMENT VACATION MAMMUMALLOWED VACATIONACCR UAL First 6 months 48 hours -- Second six months 40 hours Additional -- I through 4 years 88 hours 176 5 through 9 years 128 hours 256 10 through 14 years 168 hours 336 15 through 19 years 176 hours 352 20 through 24 years 192 hours 384 25 years thereafter 208 hours 416 Employees shall not use vacation leave before completing six (6) months of continuous service Employees who have reached maximum vacation accrual (24 months of accrual) will not accrue additional vacation until they have reduced their accrued balance. 6.3 Computation. Only those days on which the employee would normally be required to work shall be counted in computing the vacation period to which the employee is entitled. When a holiday falls within an employee's vacation period, the holiday will not be counted as a day of 8 Packet Pg. 128 4.4.b vacation. Vacation pay is computed on the straight time base rate in effect at the time vacation is taken. 6.4 Scheduling Employees shall submit vacation requests prior to March 1. Upon receipt of same, the City shall develop a schedule of vacations, which shall be posted on or before April 1. In the event more employees than can be scheduled request the same dates and the conflict cannot be resolved by mutual agreement among the requesting employees, the requests of the most senior employees will prevail. All vacation requests made after March 1 shall be granted where possible. Employees will be required to take vacation during a period that will be determined by departmental workload and their Supervisor. Changes in the posted vacation schedule shall be made only as necessary to meet the demands of the workload. 6.5 Accrual During Compensated Leave. Employees who are on compensated leave (vacation, sick, shared leave or any other approved paid leave) shall continue to accrue vacation leave at the regularly prescribed rate during such absence. 6.6 Compensation Upon Termination/Death. Upon termination of an employee, any accumulated vacation shall be paid off. Upon the death of an employee in active service, such payment will be made to the beneficiary of the deceased employee. Article VII - Leaves with Pay 7.1 Sick Leave. 7.1.1 Accrual. Sick leave with pay shall accrue at the rate of eight hours for each full calendar month of the full-time employee's service; provided that once an employee accrues 1,000 sick leave hours, the accrual rate will be one (1) hour of sick leave accrued for every 40 hours worked each calendar year, with a maximum amount of 1,040 hours of sick leave to be carried over each year. If an employee's total accrual drops below one thousand (1,000) hours, the standard accrual rate per their percentage of full-time employee status will continue until the employee again reaches one thousand (1,000) hours. Part-time employees regularly working twenty (20) hours per week or more shall receive prorated sick leave. 7.1.2 Definition of Sick Leave. An employee eligible for sick leave with pay shall be granted such leave for any reason allowed by law, and for periods of fifteen (15) minutes or more: a. The employee's own illness, injury or disability (including disability due to pregnancy or childbirth); an absence resulting from an employee's mental or physical illness, injury or health condition; to accommodate the employee's need for medical diagnosis, care or treatment of a mental or physical illness, injury or health condition; or an employee's need for preventive medical care; b. The need to care for a family member with a mental or physical illness injury or health condition; to care for a family member who needs medical diagnosis, care or 9 Packet Pg. 129 4.4.b treatment of a mental or physical illness; or to care for a family member who needs preventive medical care; c. When the employee's workplace has been closed by order of a public official for any health -related reason, or when an employee's child's school or place of care has been closed for such a reason. The need to care for the employee's immediate family as defined in article 7.2 with a serious health condition or emergency condition; d. For absences that qualify for leave under the domestic violence leave act, chapter 49.76 RCW; scheduled medical or dental appointments for the employee or a dependent child, provided that the employee receives advance approval from the Department head or designee; and further provided that employees must make reasonable efforts to schedule such appointments at times when they will not interfere with the scheduled work days; e. For purposes of this Section, "family member" means a child, including a biological, adopted or foster child, step -child, or a child to whom the employee stands in loco parentis, is a legal guardian or is a de facto parent, regardless of age or dependency status; a biological, adoptive, de facto or foster parent, step-parent or legal guardian of an employee or the employee's spouse or registered domestic partner or a person who stood in loco parentis when the employee was a minor child; a spouse; a registered domestic partner; a grandparent; a grandchild or a sibling. At their election, employees may use other accrued paid leave in place of or in addition to sick leave for any of the purposes described above. The certificate of a physician and/or written report concerning the need for the sick leave may be required by the Employer for absences exceeding three (3) days, and if required, shall be supplied by the employee in order to qualify for sick leave with pay. The Employer's requirements for verification may not result in an unreasonable burden or expense on the employee and may not exceed privacy or verification requirements otherwise established by law. 7.1.3 Pay Out Upon Termination. Upon honorable termination, accrued but unused sick leave up to a maximum of eight hundred (800) hours shall be paid according to the following percentage of the rate of pay in effect immediately prior to termination: a. Employee payout on separation. 1. Voluntary quit 25% 2. Layoff 50% 3. Service Retirement (PERS) 50% b. Employee payout on retirement. In addition to the above payments, an employee with accrued sick leave over the 800 hour cap shall be entitled to receive up to to Packet Pg. 130 4.4.b 100 hours of payout on the condition that the employee is eligible and applies for retirement through the PERS system. Payment to be processed in conjunction with application. Payment shall be on a one-to-one hour basis for accrued sick leave hours in the employee's bank between 800 and 900 hours. Union members, as a group (provided that every bargaining unit member agrees to such decision), may vote to have this payment made to their existing City HRANEBA account instead of in the form of a cash payment. In the event of death of the employee, payment for all unused sick leave (100% of accrued sick leave) shall be made to the surviving spouse or to his/her estate if there is no spouse, at his/her regular straight -time hourly rate of pay. 7.1.4 Worker's Compensation Offset. If an employee is simultaneously entitled to Worker's Compensation benefits and sick leave, the employee may decline the Worker's Compensation offset of sick leave usage by giving written notification to his/her supervisor within three (3) calendar days of the filing of the disability claim. Employees who are using the Worker's Compensation offset must turn over to the City Human Resources Department all compensation received from the Department of Labor and Industries, which will be used to restore a proportionate amount of sick leave used during the absence. Employees, who exhaust their accrued sick leave or elect not to use the Worker's Compensation offset, may be placed on leave without pay for a maximum of six (6) months provided the employee is able to return to work. 7.2 Bereavement Leave. Regular Full-time employees may receive up to three (3) days bereavement leave with pay in the event of a death in their immediate family. "Immediate family" means spouse, son, daughter, mother, father, brother, sister, mother-in-law, father-in-law, brother-in-law, sister-in-law, grandparents, grandchildren, and step -relations. Spouse shall mean an individual who is married to a City employee under the laws of the State of Washington, or who is in a domestic partnership which is registered with or recognized by the State of Washington in accord with the provisions of Chapter 43.07 RCW. Immediate family also refers to the spouse's relatives the same as designated for employee. Additional leave may be granted subject to approval of the Department Director and shall be charged against accumulated sick leave. 7.3 Jury Duty Leave. While on jury duty the employee shall receive his/her base pay, longevity, and other premiums required by collective bargaining agreement not including overtime, from the City. The employee must turn over to the City all additional compensation received for jury duty not to include mileage reimbursement. 7.4 Reserve Duty Leave. An employee who is a member of a State National Guard or Federal Reserve Military Unit shall be entitled to be absent from his or her duties with the City in accordance with state and federal statutes. 11 Packet Pg. 131 4.4.b Article VIII - Other Leaves of Absence 8.1 Family and Medical Leave (FML) Eligible employees are entitled to the full benefit and protection of the State and Federal Family Medical Leave (FML) and Pregnancy Disability laws. In addition to the legal requirements, the following provisions and benefits shall apply. 1) Employees are required to use accrued sick leave during any state or federal FML or pregnancy disability leave, provided the use of such leave qualifies under Section 7.1.2 herein. 2) Employees may use accrued vacation during any state and or federal FML or pregnancy disability leave, but shall not be required to do so. 3) The City is required to continue the employee's health benefits for the duration of the federal FML at the same level and under the same conditions as if the employee had been continuously employed and on paid status. 4) Federal FML shall be based upon a rolling 12 month year beginning on the date an employee takes his/her first FML leave. 8.1.1 Paid Family Medical Leave Act (PFML). Employees are eligible for Paid Family Medical Leave Act leave benefits as allowed under state law effective January 1, 2020. The premium cost for the leave will be collected effective upon ratification of this Agreement as follows: • The Employer will pay for 55% of the premiums due for the medical leave portion, with the employee paying 45% of the remaining premium dues. • The Employer will pay 100% of premiums due for the family leave portion of the premiums dues. 8.2 Discretionary Unpaid Leaves. A leave of absence without pay may be granted to any employee by the Department Director for such reasons as family care or emergency, education and personal business. 8.3 Return from Leave. Upon return from unpaid leave, all benefit accrual calculations, seniority rights, and credit for continuous service shall resume at the same level or with the same rights as the employee experienced prior to going on leave. For the purposes of leave accrual and MEBT vesting, an adjusted date will be used that reflects all previous months worked prior to taking leave. The employee's annual performance evaluation date (anniversary date) will be adjusted to reflect their time off due to the leave of absence. 8.4 Health Coverage During Unpaid Non-FML Leave. During the period of an approved leave of absence, monthly premiums for medical insurance may be paid to the City for payment to the insurance company to the extent the policy allows continued coverage, so as to maintain continued coverage. 12 Packet Pg. 132 4.4.b 8.5 Terms of the Leave. The City shall state in writing the terms of the leave of absence at the time it is granted. Unless otherwise provided herein, no sick leave or vacation leave shall accrue during any leave, nor shall the employee be entitled to any other benefits during the leave. Article IX - Health and Welfare 9.1 Coverage. The City shall make available to eligible regular full-time and regular part- time employees, and their eligible spouses and dependents, an insurance program that includes medical, dental, life and vision insurance, and an employee assistance plan (EAP) benefit. "Spouse" shall mean an individual who is married to a City employee under the laws of the State of Washington, or who is in a domestic partnership which is registered with or recognized by the State of Washington in accord with the provisions of Chapter 43.07 RCW. This insurance program includes the following: 9.1.1 Medical Insurance. Employees may choose between the following medical plans: Association of Washington Cities ("AWC") HealthFirst 250 or AWC Kaiser Permanente $20 Co -pay Plan. The Employer reserves the right to re -open negotiations related to medical insurance. 9.1.2 Dental Insurance. Dental insurance is provided through the AWC Washington Dental Service Plan F with Option III (orthodontia). 9.1.3 Vision Insurance. Vision insurance is provided through the AWC Vision Service Plan ($10.00 deductible). 9.1.4 EAP Benefit. The Employee Assistance Program is provided through AWC. 9.1.5 Life Insurance. The City will pay one hundred percent (100%) of the basic life insurance premium. 9.1.6 Light Duty. When an employee is injured at work and is released to light or modified work duties and the employer has light and/or modified work duty available for the employee, the employee will return to work on light duty during their normal working hours. 9.1.7 Flexible Spending Account (FSA). The City shall provide and administer a Flexible Spending Account (FSA) using pre-tax deductions from employees for qualified medical, childcare, transportation and other permitted uses as allowed by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Code Section 125 for employees and their eligible dependents. 9.1.8 Health Reimbursement Arrangement / Voluntary Employees' Beneficiary Association (HRA/VEBA). The Employer will establish an HRA/VEBA for each employee who is eligible and enrolled in or covered by one of the Employer's health insurance plans as described in Section 9.1.1. The Employer agrees to pay all fees for the establishment and maintenance of the HRA/VEBA accounts for which it is legally allowed to pay. Effective upon ratification, the Employer agrees to make the following contributions to the HRA/VEBA 13 Packet Pg. 133 4.4.b accounts: Year Contribution 2018 & 2019 (upon ratification) $1250 (one time) January 1, 2020 $250 The Employer's contributions to the HRANEBA account in the amount of $250 each year per employee will be provided contingent upon the bargaining group (as a whole) meeting the annual participation requirement for the AWC Well City Award. Union members, as a group, may vote to make contributions via payroll deduction to their HRANEBA account. The amount of the HRANEBA contribution may be adjusted by a majority vote of Union members, no more than once per year, and with appropriate notice to the City. Health Insurance Premiums. 9.2 Full -Time Employees. For all regular full-time employees and their eligible spouses and dependents, the City will pay 90% of the premium costs of the benefits specified in Section 9.1. 9.3 Part-time Employees. For regular part-time employees normally scheduled to work a minimum of twenty (20) hours per week and their eligible spouses and dependents, the City's premium contribution described in Section 9.2 will be reduced on a pro -rated basis according to the part-time employee's budgeted FTE. Changes to Health Insurance Plans. 9.4 Changes to Plan Benefits. Benefit changes other than those plans specified in Section 9.1 will be made by mutual agreement. Article X - Job Share 10.1 Definition and Implementation. A job share position is defined as a full-time budgeted position, which is occupied by two (2) part-time employees. Job sharing shall be implemented, and thereafter continued, only upon the approval of the Supervisor and the Department Head of the relevant position(s) and, in the instance of an occupied position, the request of the employee. 10.2 Schedule. Employees will share a full-time position on a half-time basis using a work schedule, which is convenient to the City and the employees. Examples of schedules that might be used are: (1) Each employee works four (4) hours per day; (2) Each employee works forty (40) hours in alternating weeks; (3) Each employee works twenty-four (24) hours one week and 14 Packet Pg. 134 4.4.b sixteen (16) hours the alternate week; (4) Each employee works two and one-half (2-1/2) days per week. 10.3 Coordination. The employees will be expected to coordinate with each other so that the responsibilities of the position and the level of required productivity are not adversely affected. 10.4 Compensation. Each employee will be paid one-half (1/2) of the established salary for the position. Due to seniority, the two (2) employees may be paid at different steps in the salary grade, however, whenever one (1) employee is on vacation, sick leave or absent the second employee shall have right of first refusal for available hours Whenever one (1) employee works during vacation, sick leave or other absence of the second employee, the working employee will receive additional compensation at the regular rate of pay for excess hours worked up to forty (40) hours in one (1) week. Any hours worked beyond forty (40) in one (1) week will be compensated at time and one-half. 10.5 Benefits. Each employee working a minimum of 20 hours a week will be entitled to the following prorated benefits: 1. Vacation, Sick Leave and Holidays on a pro -rated basis; 2. Medical, Dental and Vision insurance with the City share of the premium pro- rated; 3. Basic Life Insurance paid for in full by the City; 4. Participation in the state Retirement Program (PERS) and the Municipal Employees' Benefit Trust; 5. Participation in other employee programs, including but not limited to the Employee Suggestion Program, Perfect Attendance Award, Wellness Program, and Employee Assistance Program. Article XI — Evaluation 11.1 Procedure. The following procedure shall be used to assist in the performance evaluation of the employee: Each employee shall be evaluated at least annually, and each evaluation shall concern an employee's work performance for the entire period since the most recent previous evaluation. The evaluation shall include reference to weaknesses and strengths with specific suggestions for improvement where appropriate and shall be reviewed with the employee. A copy of the evaluation will be placed in the employee's personnel file and a copy will be given to the employee. The employees will be given an opportunity to attach comments to the evaluation for the personnel file. 15 Packet Pg. 135 4.4.b 11.2 Evaluation Appeal. An employee may appeal an evaluation through the Grievance Procedure, Article XVI, but such appeal may not be submitted to arbitration. Article XII - Change in Status 12.1 Definition of Seniority. Seniority shall be defined as total length of service in a bargaining unit position with the City excluding the portion of unpaid extended leaves of absence in excess of thirty (30) calendar days. Unpaid leave means a leave granted pursuant to Article 8.2 and does not include leave in which the City extends benefits such as FMLA leave. 12.2 Promotions and Transfers. Appointment of employees to positions shall be made by the City upon selection of the applicants determined by the City in its sole discretion to be best qualified for the position(s) and after providing adequate opportunity and consideration for transfer and promotion of current employees. At the request of the employee, the City will provide the reasons for non -selection for the open position. Upon promotion an employee shall be placed on the wage scale at the step that provides at least a five percent (5%) per month increase in wages. During the employee's six (6) month probationary period upon his/her promotion to a position within the bargaining unit, an employee may be demoted in the City's discretion and without recourse to the grievance procedure. Upon request by the employee, the City shall inform the employee of the rationale for the demotion. 12.3 Reclassification. Upon reclassification of a position to a higher classification effective after the date of this Agreement, the incumbent employee shall be placed on the wage scale at the step that provides at least a five percent (5%) per month increase in wages. 12.4 Reduction in Force. An employee will receive fifteen (15) working days advance notice of layoff with a copy of such notice to the Union. In the event of a reduction in force, the City shall determine the order of layoff based upon the qualifications, performance evaluations of record, specializations needed for retained positions, and seniority with the union. When these factors are equal, employees shall be laid off in reverse order of seniority. Employees may "bump" or displace to a position in the same or lower pay grade if they meet the minimum qualifications and if their seniority exceeds that of the other employee's in the pay grade. For the purpose of bumping into the municipal court, an employee may bump or displace, if in addition, he/she meets the qualifications for the job and the needs of the court and the Judge. If the Judge in his or her discretion declines to accept the application and an employee who was eligible to bump is laid off due to the Judge's decision, that employee shall be entitled to one month of severance pay. In addition, the City shall pay directly to the insurance provider up to three months of insurance premiums as set forth in Article IX for the employee. 16 Packet Pg. 136 4.4.b Upon receipt of the Official Notice of Reduction in Force that will be mailed to the employee's address on file with the City, the employee will have a period of 10 working days in which to consider employment options. The Official Notice will include information pertaining to the employee's right to displace other employees as outlined in this section. A copy of the Official Notice will be sent to the union. Employees wishing to exercise their displacement rights must provide to the Human Resources Department, a Statement of Intent to Displace within the 10 working day notice period. Along with the Statement of Intent to Displace, the employee must identify a maximum of three positions, listed in priority order, for which they are qualified and for which they have the required level of seniority. The employee must also include a full and complete description of verifiable qualifications for each position identified. The City shall review within five (5) working days, in order, the employee's displacement choices based on their qualifications, performance evaluations of record, specializations and seniority. From this data, the City will determine the position (as high on the priority listings as possible), into which the employee is qualified to bump. Knowledge, skills, and abilities as contained in the current job description of the position in question, shall be the basis from which the determination is made. In cases where qualifications, performance, and union seniority are equal, seniority will be the determining factor. The City shall not lay off bargaining unit employees in lieu of disciplinary action. Employees who are displaced will be provided the same notice and rights as outlined above. If the Department Head and employee mutually agree, the displaced employee may take paid administrative leave for the duration of the 15 working day advance notice period. Employees cannot gain hours through the "bumping" process. In other words, a part time position may not bump a full time position. In addition, employees who currently share a position (job share) can, together, petition to bump into a full time position if they are qualified and meet the required level of seniority. The pay grade of the position bumped into will prevail; however, the employee shall be placed at a step as comparable to their current pay as possible within the pay grade. All displaced employees will be provided an out processing interview to review their benefits and various options as an inactive employee on recall status. Displaced employees will not be allowed to "run out" accrued leave balances but will be paid out in accordance with the union agreement. Employees who move into a new position as a result of this process shall be in a trial status and shall receive written performance evaluations once a month throughout the six month trial period. At the successful completion of the six month trial period, the employee will resume the normal evaluation process as outlined in City policy. Employees, who are unable to satisfactorily perform the duties of the new position, will be subject to termination. 17 Packet Pg. 137 4.4.b 12.5 Rehire. All employees who are laid off in accordance with this procedure shall be placed in a recall pool for up to twenty-four (24) months for recall by seniority in positions for which they are qualified. In the event of a recall, those employees laid off shall be the first to be recalled to fill vacancies in their former positions or any position for which they have bumping rights. All employees on the recall list shall be informed when a position opens. Those employees with the most seniority in the bargaining unit shall be recalled first, provided they can perform the duties required in the classification affected. The names of persons laid off shall be maintained on a recall list. The list will be maintained by the Human Resources Department. For a period of 24 months from the date of layoff, regular employees who were laid off will be placed on the City's job announcement mailing list to assist them in applying for other job vacancies for which they may be qualified. Employees on layoff must keep the City informed of their current address and telephone number so that they may be contacted in a timely fashion. The City will notify employee by certified letter and document efforts to contact employees, and will send copies of all correspondence to the union. If the City is unable to contact the employee within ten consecutive working days from the date of notification, the City's obligation to recall an employee for that position shall cease. From the date of the receipt of a recall notice the employee who has been recalled will have five (5) working days to notify the City of their intent to return to work. Thereafter, the employee shall have 10 working days to report to work unless an extension is granted by the City. If the employee refuses a specific job offer within the 24 month layoff period, he/she shall be removed from the recall list. The City shall have no obligation to recall Employees after they have been on continuous layoff for a period of 24 months. If the individual is hired back within the 24-month layoff period, for purposes of leave accrual and MEBT vesting, an adjusted date will be used that reflects all previous months worked prior to layoff. Employees returning to their same position will have their annual performance evaluation date (anniversary date) adjusted to reflect their time off due to the reduction in force. 12.6 Posting of Vacancies. Position vacancies will be posted in all work locations for a period of five (5) working days. Postings will be longer than five (5) days if possible without delaying the hiring process. Article XIII - Suspension and Discharge 13.1 Probationary Employees. During an employee's first six (6) months' employment with the City within the bargaining unit, an employee may be discharged at the City's discretion and without recourse to the grievance procedure. 18 Packet Pg. 138 4.4.b 13.2 Discipline/Corrective Action. The City agrees that an employee shall be disciplined, including suspension and discharge, only for just cause. The City agrees to follow the principles of progressive discipline. Disciplinary action generally includes the following progressive steps: 1. Oral warning which shall be reduced to writing and noted as an oral warning; 2. Written reprimand; 3. Suspension or demotion; and 4. Discharge A corrective action plan in writing will be provided and discussed at each step of the disciplinary process. This action plan will include clear objectives, expectations and timelines. Coach/Counseling Sessions and oral and written reprimands are deemed to be a means of communicating problems to an employee and are not subject to grievance beyond Step 3 of the grievance procedure. Discipline involving economic impact (suspension, demotion and discharge) may move beyond Step 3 of the grievance process. Disciplinary action will be tailored to the nature and severity of the offense. Management maintains the right to take disciplinary action as they deem appropriate which may include skipping above steps to address severe discipline issues. Records of oral warnings shall be removed from the employee's file in the Human Resources Department after a one (1) year period if no related violations occur. Discipline involving a written reprimand or suspension shall be maintained in the employees official personnel file. The Department of Human Resources shall be the central depositor for all official personnel records and files. Employees shall be provided a copy of all adverse material placed in the official file at the time the material is included in the file. All official personnel records shall be maintained by the Department of Human Resources. 13.3 Written Notice. Upon request by the affected employee, the City will provide the employee in writing the reasons for suspension or discharge. Provided, that the reasons set forth shall not preclude the City from presenting additional evidence of the grounds for the action at any subsequent arbitration hearing. Article XIV -Union Rij4hts 14.1 Union Access. Upon application to the supervisor, the authorized representatives of the Union shall be granted access to the City's premises at any reasonable time for the purpose of adjusting grievances, investigating working conditions, or ascertaining that provisions of this Agreement are being adhered to; provided, that they do not interfere with employees in the performance of their duties. 19 Packet Pg. 139 4.4.b 14.2 Bulletin Boards. The City will make available suitable space in each building for the use of the Union for posting notices of its meetings, elections, recreational and social affairs, reports of Union committees, and rulings and policies of the Union. 14.3 Labor Management Committee The parties shall establish a joint Labor -Management Committee that shall meet on an as needed basis. The Committee shall be composed of an equal number of the Directors/Division Managers and members of the Union. It is understood that the committee shall function in a consultative capacity and shall not be considered a collective bargaining forum, nor a decision making body unless the parties mutually agree to otherwise on a given topic. Either the Union or the City may initiate a discussion on an appropriate topic. Article XV - Rights of Management 15.1 General. It is understood that the City retains its right to manage personnel and operate its Departments except as may be limited by an express provision of this Agreement. This Agreement shall not limit the right of the City to contract for services of any and all types; provided, that no bargaining unit employees lose their employment as a result of the City's decision to contract for services. 15.2 Method of Providing Service. Delivery of municipal services in the most efficient, effective and courteous manner is of paramount importance to the City, and the parties pledge their agreement with the objective of achieving the optimal level of employee performance and efficiency and reasonable working conditions consistent with safety, good health and sustained effort. In order to achieve this goal, the parties hereby recognize the City's right to determine the personnel, the methods, processes and means of providing municipal services, to increase, diminish, or change municipal equipment, including the introduction of any and all new, improved or automated methods or equipment, the assignment of employees to specific jobs within the bargaining unit, and the temporary assignment of employees covered by this Agreement to jobs outside the bargaining unit. Employees temporarily assigned to positions outside the bargaining unit shall retain all benefits and protections provided by this Agreement. 15.3 Performance Standards. The Union recognizes the City's right to establish and/or revise performance standards. Such standards may be used to determine acceptable performance levels, prepare work schedules, and measure the performance of employees. Such performance standards shall be reasonable. 15.4 Article Not Subiect to Grievance Procedure. The exercise of any rights provided in this Article shall not be subject to the grievance procedure unless such exercise is thought to violate the express terms of this Agreement. 20 Packet Pg. 140 4.4.b Article XVI - Work Stoppage The City and the Union agree that the public interest requires the efficient and uninterrupted performance of all City services, and to this end pledge their best efforts to avoid or eliminate any conduct contrary to this objective. During the term of this Agreement, the Union and/or the employees covered by this Agreement shall not cause or engage in any work stoppage, strike, slowdown or other interference with City functions. Employees covered by this Agreement who engage in any of the foregoing actions shall be subject to such disciplinary actions as may be determined by the City. Article XVII - Miscellaneous 17.1 Mileage. All employees who have been authorized to use their own transportation on City business shall be reimbursed at the rate authorized by the Internal Revenue Service for employee mileage. 17.2 Use of Personal Vehicle. No employee shall normally be required to use a personal vehicle on City business. 17.3 Training Program. The City may provide employees release time with pay or compensatory time off to attend training programs that the City determines will be beneficial to their job performance. The City will attempt to provide notice of such training opportunities by posting notice or otherwise providing appropriate notice. If the City requires attendance at such training programs, the City will pay the expenses incurred. 17.4 Conferences. Matters of common concern to the parties concerning the application or interpretation of this Agreement will be the subject of Meet and Confer discussion upon request of either the City or the Union Representative. Such meetings will be scheduled at the mutual convenience of both parties. 17.5 Personnel Files. The employee and/or representative may examine the employee's personnel file in the offices of the Human Resources Department if the employee so authorizes and releases the City from any obligation for breach of confidentiality in writing. Material placed into the employee's file relating to job performance or personal character shall be brought to his or her attention. The employee may challenge the propriety of including it in the files. If the City refuses to remove the challenged material, the employee shall not have the right to the grievance procedure but the employee shall have the right to insert documentation into the file, providing such documentation is relevant to the challenge. Except as may be required by state or federal laws or regulations, unauthorized persons shall not have access to employee files or other personal data related to their employment. 17.6 Recreation Passes. Employees shall be provided free of charge with weight room, gym, and swimming pool passes to be used during non -working hours. 17.7 Reclassification Requests. It is the supervisor's responsibility to maintain the employee's primary job assignments within the existing job description, until a revised job 21 Packet Pg. 141 4.4.b description is approved. Requests for revised job descriptions can be made by the Department Director to the Human Resources Department. Revised job descriptions, along with the appropriate pay grade, are subject to the Mayor's approval, before submittal to the Finance Committee and City Council for their approval. 17.8 Drivers License Verification. All employees operating a City of Edmonds vehicle must have a valid Washington State Drivers License (DL). Any employee operating a City of Edmonds vehicle on a suspended or revoked DL is subject to disciplinary action up to and including termination. Article XVIII - Grievance Procedure A grievance shall be defined as an issue raised, relating to the interpretation, application or violation of any terms or provisions of this Agreement 18.1 Grievance Steps. When an employee has a grievance he/she shall bring it to the attention of his/her immediate supervisor, and the employee and supervisor shall attempt to settle the grievance. If the grievance cannot be settled, the employee shall state the grievance in writing and present it to his/her supervisor in accordance with the procedure set forth below: a. Step 1. An employee and/or the Union, within ten (10) working days from the occurrence or knowledge of the occurrence of an alleged grievance (but in no event more than sixty (60) calendar days from the date of occurrence), may bring said grievance to the attention of the immediate supervisor in writing, stating clearly the facts and issues relating to the grievance, the provisions of the Agreement allegedly violated, and the remedy sought. The parties shall attempt to meet and resolve the grievance within ten (10) working days. The immediate supervisor will respond within ten (10) working days of the meeting. b. Step 2. If a satisfactory settlement is not reached in Step One, and the employee wishes to pursue the matter further, said grievance shall be put to writing and referred to the Department Head within ten (10) working days after the decision from Step One. The parties shall attempt to meet to resolve the grievance within ten (10) working days of the date of the written submittal. The Department Head shall rule on the merits of the alleged grievance and respond in writing within ten (10) working days of the meeting. In the event the employee's immediate supervisor is the Department Head, the Mayor or his/her designee shall consider the grievance at this step. c. Step 3. If a satisfactory settlement is not reached at Step Two, the grievant with authorization from the Union may submit the written grievance to the Mayor within ten (10) working days after the decision from Step Two. The parties shall attempt to meet to resolve the grievance within ten (10) working days of the written submittal. Failure of the Mayor or his/her designee to satisfactorily resolve the alleged grievance shall permit the Union the right to submit a demand for arbitration to the City in writing within ten (10) working days of receipt of the response at Step 3 or, failing a response, within ten (10) working days of the date the response was due. 22 Packet Pg. 142 4.4.b d. Selection of Arbitrator. The City and the Union shall immediately thereafter select an arbitrator to hear the dispute. If the City and the Union are not able to agree upon an arbitrator within ten (10) working days after receipt by the City of the written demand for arbitration, the parties shall jointly request a list of eleven (11) arbitrators from the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service (FMCS) The list shall be limited to arbitrators who are members of the National Academy of Arbitrators from Washington and/or Oregon sub -regions. Within ten (10) working days after receipt of same, the parties shall alternately strike the names of the arbitrators until only one name remains, who shall hear the dispute. The parry striking first will be the winner of the flip of a coin. e. Authority of the Arbitrator. The Arbitrator shall have no power to render a decision that will add to, subtract from, alter, change, or modify the terms of this Agreement, and his/her power shall be limited to interpretation or application of the express terms of this Agreement, and all other matters shall be excluded from arbitration. The decision of the arbitrator shall be presented in writing, and shall be final and binding upon the parties; provided that the decision does not involve action by the arbitrator beyond his or her jurisdiction. 18.2 Union Assistance. Nothing herein shall prevent an employee from seeking assistance from the Union or the Union from furnishing such assistance at any stage of the grievance procedure. 18.3 Expenses. Each party shall pay the compensation and expenses for its own representatives and witnesses, including attorneys' fees. The parties will share equally the costs and expenses of the arbitrator. 18.4 Time Requirements. If the grievant fails to take the action required within the times provided herein, he/she shall forfeit the right to further protest the grievance, denial of the grievance or interim recommended solution. Failure on the part of the City to respond at Step 1 within the specified time limit shall automatically move the grievance to the next step. 18.5 Conflict Resolution Process Purpose To address and resolve employee conflicts and/or problems in the workplace that are not covered under the scope of a labor agreement, Personnel Policies, or other formal means of grievance resolution. The Conflict Resolution Process (CRP) addresses conflicts between employees and/or supervisors arising from problems involving personal differences, inappropriate behavior, poor communications, or similar reasons. The intent of the CRP process is to resolve poor working relationships, which adversely impact others or services. Process All employees are encouraged to discuss problems they are experiencing with their co-workers or supervisor in an honest and frank manner. Both parties are encouraged to resolve the conflict or problem among themselves in the most fair way, which is mutually acceptable to both parties. If 23 Packet Pg. 143 4.4.b the problem cannot be resolved among the involved parties, the employee may initiate the next step in the CRP process. Step 1. Any employee with or without the assistance of a representative can initiate the CRP process by providing the other party(s) in the dispute with a written notice containing short statements outlining 1) the problem or conflict, 2) the adverse impact upon the employee, and 3) the remedy sought. A copy of the written notice must also be provided to the other party's supervisor. The other party must respond in writing to the employee within one calendar week with a copy of the response also going to their immediate supervisor. Step 2. If the conflict is not resolved by these actions, the employee shall request in writing for the other parties' supervisor to resolve the issue(s). At the request of either party a mutually agreeable mediator/fact finder will be invited to assist the parties in reaching a mutually agreeable resolution. The expense of the mediator, if any, shall be paid by the City. This action must be taken within two calendar weeks following receipt of the employee's request for resolution of the issue(s). Step 3. If the two parties involved in the dispute are not successful in resolving the issue(s), the supervisor and/or mediator shall prepare a written report outlining the facts presented by both parties involved in the issue along with a recommendation for a fair and equitable resolution to the problem. This report shall be provided to both parties in a confidential manner. Step 4. If the parties have not mutually resolved the issue(s) within one week following receipt of the mediator's report, the report shall be submitted to the Mayor. The Mayor shall review the report and issue a final resolution to the problem, which shall be binding upon all parties, involved in the dispute. The parties shall carry out the Mayor's directive in a cooperative manner. Retaliatory action from either party is strictly prohibited. Step 5. A follow-up action will be conducted by the Human Resources Department, after forty- five (45) days to insure compliance with the Mayor's resolution. A written follow-up report will be provided to all parties involved, including the Mayor. Article XIX - Entire Agreement The Agreement expressed herein in writing constitutes the entire Agreement between the parties. The parties acknowledge that each has had the unlimited right and opportunity to make demands and proposals with respect to any matter deemed a proper subject for collective bargaining. The results of the exercise of that right are set forth in this Agreement. Therefore, except as otherwise provided in this Agreement, each voluntarily and unqualifiedly agrees to waive the right to oblige the other party to bargain with respect to any subject or matter not specifically referred to or covered in this Agreement. 24 Packet Pg. 144 4.4.b Article XX -.Savings Clause Should any part hereof or any provision herein contained be rendered or declared invalid by reason of any existing or subsequently enacted legislation, ordinance, or by any decree of a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidation of such part or portion of this Agreement shall not invalidate the remaining portions hereof, provided, however, upon such invalidation that parties mutually agree to meet and negotiate such parts or provisions affected. The remaining parts or provisions shall remain in full force and effect. Article XXI - Term of Agreement This Agreement shall become effective upon January 1, 2018 and shall remain in effect until December 31, 2020. EDMONDS EMPLOYEE ASSOCIATION, CITY OF EDMONDS LOCAL 3517 (AFSCME COUNCIL 2) Date Organizer/Representative Bargaining Team Member Bargaining Team Member Date David O. Earling, Mayor ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED Scott Passey, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Office of the City Attorney 2s Packet Pg. 145 4.4.b APPENDIX "A" 1. RATES OF PAY, EFFECTIVE: January 1, 2018 2018 PAY NE-14 Jl 6121 J11 Y ll JlLjr �lEY 1V J11� 6244 6557 6885 7232 7592 NE-13 5774 5892 6182 6492 6812 7157 NE-12** 5568 5678 5964 6260 6573 6901 NE-12* 5515 5624 5905 6200 6510 6835 NE-12 5408 5513 5790 6078 6382 6700 NE-11* 5300 5408 5679 5964 6261 6572 NE-11 5097 5199 5461 5734 6020 6319 NE-10 4819 4920 5169 5424 5694 5980 NE-9 4537 4626 4856 5099 5356 5626 NE-8 4283 4370 4588 4817 5059 5314 NE-7 4058 4141 4346 4566 4794 5029 NE-6 3811 3889 4081 4285 4501 4725 NE-5 3583 3660 3839 4033 4233 4445 NE-4 3394 3462 3633 3818 4009 4211 NE-3 3215 3282 3443 3616 3799 3988 NE-2 3026 3091 3242 3404 3571 3750 S02 17.46 17.83 18.70 19.64 I 20.60 21.64 26 Packet Pg. 146 4.4.b January1,2019 2019 rA Y SAft EP V NE-14 6305 6431 6754 7092 7449 STEP VI 7820 NE-13 5947 6069 6367 6687 7016 7372 NE-12** 5735 5848 6143 6448 6770 7108 NE-12* 5680 5793 6082 6386 6705 7040 NE-12 5570 5678 5963 6260 6573 6901 NE-11* 5459 5570 5849 6143 6449 I 6769 NE-11 5250 5355 5625 5906 6201 I 6509 NE-10 4964 5068 5324 5587 5865 6159 NE-9 4673 4765 5002 5251 5517 5795 NE-8 4411 4501 4725 4962 5211 5473 NE-7 4180 4265 4476 4703 4938 5180 NE-6 3925 4006 4203 4414 4636 4867 NE-5 3690 3770 3954 4154 4360 4579 NE-4 3496 3566 3742 3933 4129 4337 NE-3 3311 3380 3546 3724 3913 4108 NE-2 3117 3184 3339 3506 3678 3863 S02 17.98 18.36 19.26 20.23 21.22 22.29 A.1 Wages As this is the initial collective bargaining agreement between the City and the Union, the parties entered into an interim agreement that the wages paid for work performed between the expiration of the prior Collective Bargaining Agreement on December 31, 2017 and the ratification of this Agreement would not be considered to be full compensation for that work. Therefore, the wage increases set forth below take into account that the City will be making to employees the necessary retroactive payment for wage increases during that time period. Wage increases for 2018, 2019, and 2020 for all EDMONDS EMPLOYEE ASSOCIATION, LOCAL 3517 (AFSCME COUNCIL 2) employees employed by the city on the final date of ratification by both parties, will be as follows: The monthly rates of pay for each classification covered by this Agreement for 2018 shall be increased over the 2017 rates by three percent (3%). 27 Packet Pg. 147 4.4.b Effective January 1, 2019, the monthly rates of pay for each classification covered by this Agreement shall be increased by one hundred percent (100%) of the percentage increase in the Seattle -Tacoma -Bellevue Area Consumer Price Index semi-annual average from June to June of the previous year, with a minimum increase three percent (3.0%) and a maximum increase of three percent (3.0%). The Index used shall be the Consumer Price Index for Urban Consumers (CPI-U), All Items Indexes, Revised Series (1982-84+100) for the Seattle -Tacoma -Bellevue area, as published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Effective January 1, 2020, the monthly rates of pay for each classification covered by this Agreement shall be increased by shall be increased by one hundred percent (100%) of the percentage increase in the Seattle -Tacoma -Bellevue Area Consumer Price Index semi-annual average from June to June of the previous year, with a minimum increase three percent (3.0%) and a maximum increase of three percent (3.0%). The Index used shall be the Consumer Price Index for Urban Consumers (CPI-U), All Items Indexes, Revised Series (1982-84+100) for the Seattle -Tacoma -Bellevue area, as published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Any retroactive wage payment will be made to each member of the bargaining unit in separate check. A.2 Wage Step Advancement. Step advancement shall be based upon completion of the applicable length of service and satisfactory performance. If the completion of such period of time occurs at other than the beginning of a semi-monthly pay period, the advancement to the new pay step shall become effective at the beginning of the next semi-monthly pay period. The normal orientation period is six (6) months from the employee's date of hire, rehire or promotion. The Mayor may authorize the department director to extend the orientation period for up to an additional six (6) months. An extension may be granted due to circumstances such as an extended illness or a continued need to evaluate an employee. Extensions for represented employees also require concurrence with the Union. After successful completion of the six (6) month probationary trial period, an employee shall receive a step increase of one step not to exceed the maximum of the negotiated pay grade table. The completion of probation establishes the anniversary date used for future performance evaluations and/or step increases. The City shall have the right to place an employee in any pay STEP above the minimum set forth herein, in which event, advancement of said employee to each of the next higher pay STEPS shall be governed by this section A.2. The six (6) month probationary STEP increase shall apply regardless of the STEP in which the employee is initially placed. A.3 Provision of Tools, Clothing and Safety Equipment. Any boots to be worn by employees shall be purchased by the employees upon their initial hiring. Thereafter, engineer inspector, engineering technician, engineering aide, senior construction inspector, building inspector, combination inspector, senior combination building inspector, plans examiner, senior plans examiner, stormwater technician, and code enforcement officer will receive up to one 28 Packet Pg. 148 4.4.b hundred and seventy five dollars ($175.00) per year for replacement of boots if necessary. Thereafter the allowance will be increased by the Consumer Price Index as calculated in Section A.1 and rounded to the nearest dollar. The City will provide rubber boots for the aquatics/athletic coordinator. Any raingear and/or uniform necessary shall be provided on a department basis and used by employees as needed. A.4 Position Classification Schedule Position Title Pay Grade Senior Combination Building Inspector NE-14 Accountant NE-14 Financial Analyst NE-14 Financial Manager — Public Works NE- 14 GIS Analyst NE-14 Recreation Coordinator NE-13 Environmental Education & Sustainability Coordinator NE-13 IT Network Specialist NE-13 Engineering Technician III NE-13 IT Systems Specialist NE 13 Senior Plans Examiner NE 13 Community Services Program Coordinator NE-12 Combination Building Inspector NE-12 * * Plans Examiner NE-12 * Code Enforcement Officer NE-12 Building Inspector NE-11 Senior Permit Coordinator NE- 11 PC Support Technician NE- 11 Engineering Technician II NE- 11 Stormwater Technician NE- 11 Executive Assistant- Public Works NE-10 Executive Assistant — Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services NE-10 Office Coordinator NE-10 Probation Officer NE -10 Engineering Technician I NE-10 Permit Coordinator NE-09 Administrative Assistant (Development Services) NE-09 Administrative Assistant NE-09 Deputy City Clerk NE-09 Lead Court Clerk NE-09 Accounting Specialist NE-09 Part -Time IT Assistant NE-09 Permit Coordinator I NE-07 Business License Clerk NE-07 Court Clerk NE-07 29 Packet Pg. 149 4.4.b Senior Office Specialist NE-06 Office Assistant NE-04 Recreation Leader NE-02 A.5 — Longevity Pay Based on total length of service in a bargaining unit position, employees shall receive, in addition to their monthly rate of pay set forth in Appendix A., monthly Longevity Pay in accordance with the following: Seniori 5 years I Oyears 14 years 18 years 25 years Longevity Pay 0.5% of employee's monthly rate of pay 1.0% of employee's monthly rate of pay 1.5% of employee's monthly rate of pay 2.0% of employee's monthly rate of pay 2.5% of employee's monthly rate of pay 30 Packet Pg. 150 4.4.b LETTER OF INTENT by and between CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON AND EDMONDS EMPLOYEE ASSOCIATION, LOCAL 3517 (AFSCME COUNCIL 2) THIS LETTER OF INTENT is by and between the CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON (the "City") and EDMONDS EMPLOYEE ASSOCIATION, LOCAL 3517 (AFSCME COUNCIL 2) It is understood and agreed by and between the City and Edmonds Employee Association, Local 3517 (AFSCME Council 2) as follows: WHEREAS, the City and Edmonds Employee Association, Local 3517 (AFSCME Council 2), as a result of the collective bargaining process, have ratified a Collective Bargaining Agreement ("CBA") that will be in effect for the period of January 1, 2018 through December 31, 2020; and WHEREAS, as part of the collective bargaining process, the parties agreed to the following provision: 4.2 Working Out of Classification. An employee assigned by a supervisor, in writing, or has in the course of regular duties to have assumed all the duties of a higher classification for a period of four (4) or more consecutive working days, or performs said duties in a greater than %2 FTE (full time equivalent) basis for more than one pay period, shall during the period of that assignment be placed at the step on the wage scale of the higher classification that provides an increase over the employee's regular rate of pay of at least five percent (5%). This shall include work out of classification to cover for another employee's scheduled vacation. Seniority shall be a consideration when assigning employees to work out of classification. With regard to working out of class; and WHEREAS, the City and EDMONDS EMPLOYEE ASSOCIATION, LOCAL 3517 (AFSCME COUNCIL 2) agree that the above language does not contemplate an employee acting out of class in a supervisory position that is not an EDMONDS EMPLOYEE ASSOCIATION, LOCAL 3517 (AFSCME COUNCIL 2) position; and WHEREAS, the City and EDMONDS EMPLOYEE ASSOCIATION, LOCAL 3517 (AFSCME COUNCIL 2) agree that it is appropriate for the City to pay the Deputy City Clerk positon, a higher acting out of class premium for undertaking a portion of the duties of the Clerk Clerk, which is a supervisory position that is not an EDMONDS EMPLOYEE ASSOCIATION, LOCAL 3517 (AFSCME COUNCIL 2) position, during the City Clerk's leave; NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual benefits to be derived, the City and EDMONDS EMPLOYEE ASSOCIATION, LOCAL 3517 (AFSCME COUNCIL 2) hereby agree as follows: Should the Deputy City Clerk be assigned to work out of class ("acting out of class") for the City for a period of at least four (4) work days and up to nine (9) consecutive work days, the Deputy City Clerk 31 Packet Pg. 151 4.4.b position will be paid the additional 10% increase over her regular rate of pay for this period of time that the Deputy City Clerk position is working out of class as the City Clerk. This agreement does not set a precedent for future requests for increased acting out of class pay for the Deputy City Clerk position or any other employee who is required to temporarily undertake supervisory duties in a non -union position. This Letter of Intent is effective upon the signature of the CBA by both parties. 32 Packet Pg. 152 4.4.b LETTER OF INTENT by and between CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON AND EDMONDS EMPLOYEE ASSOCIATION, LOCAL 3517 (AFSCME COUNCIL 2) THIS LETTER OF INTENT is by and between the CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON (the "City") and EDMONDS EMPLOYEE ASSOCIATION, LOCAL 3517 (AFSCME COUNCIL 2), ("EDMONDS EMPLOYEE ASSOCIATION, LOCAL 3517 (AFSCME COUNCIL 2)"). It is understood and agreed by and between the City and EDMONDS EMPLOYEE ASSOCIATION, LOCAL 3517 (AFSCME COUNCIL 2) as follows: WHEREAS, the City and EDMONDS EMPLOYEE ASSOCIATION, LOCAL 3517 (AFSCME COUNCIL 2), as a result of the collective bargaining process, have ratified a Collective Bargaining Agreement ("CBA") that will be in effect for the period of January 1, 2018 through December 31, 2020; and WHEREAS, as part of the collective bargaining process, the parties agreed to the following provision: 4.2 Working Out of Classification. An employee assigned by a supervisor, in writing, or has in the course of regular duties to have assumed all the duties of a higher classification for a period of four (4) or more consecutive working days, or performs said duties in a greater than %2 FTE (full time equivalent) basis for more than one pay period, shall during the period of that assignment be placed at the step on the wage scale of the higher classification that provides an increase over the employee's regular rate of pay of at least five percent (5%). This shall include work out of classification to cover for another employee's scheduled vacation. Seniority shall be a consideration when assigning employees to work out of classification. With regard to working out of class; and WHEREAS, the City and EDMONDS EMPLOYEE ASSOCIATION, LOCAL 3517 (AFSCME COUNCIL 2) agree that the above language does not contemplate an employee acting out of class in a supervisory position that is not an EDMONDS EMPLOYEE ASSOCIATION, LOCAL 3517 (AFSCME COUNCIL 2) position; NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual benefits to be derived, the City and EDMONDS EMPLOYEE ASSOCIATION, LOCAL 3517 (AFSCME COUNCIL 2) hereby agree as follows: Should the Lead Court Clerk be assigned to work out of class ("acting out of class") for the Court Administrator for a period of at least four (4) work days and up to nine (9) consecutive work days, the Lead Court Clerk position will be paid the additional 10% increase over his/her regular rate of pay for this period of time that the Lead Court Clerk position is working out of class. 33 Packet Pg. 153 4.4.b This agreement does not set a precedent for future requests for increased acting out of class pay for the Lead Court Clerk or any other employee who is required to temporarily undertake supervisory duties in a non -union position. This Letter of Intent is effective upon the signature of the CBA by both parties. 34 Packet Pg. 154 4.4.b Memorandum of Understanding Amended to the AGREEMENT by and between CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON and EDMONDS EMPLOYEE ASSOCIATION, LOCAL 3517 (AFSCME COUNCIL 2) Effective January 1, 2018 THIS AMENDMENT is supplemental to the AGREEMENT by and between the CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON (hereinafter the "City") and the EDMONDS EMPLOYEE ASSOCIATION, LOCAL 3517 (AFSCME COUNCIL 2) (hereinafter "EDMONDS EMPLOYEE ASSOCIATION, LOCAL 3517 (AFSCME COUNCIL 2)"). WHEREAS, the parties have ratified a Collective Bargaining Agreement (hereinafter "CBA") effective January 1, 2018 through December 31, 2020; and WHEREAS, Section 1.1 of the CBA provides that employees covered by the CBA include "All regular full- and part-time clerical, professional and technical employees regularly scheduled for twenty (20) or more hours per week as listed by position in Appendix `A"'; and WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to a change in the working hours of one of the positions currently on the EDMONDS EMPLOYEE ASSOCIATION, LOCAL 3517 (AFSCME COUNCIL 2) classification schedule to reduce them below twenty (20) hours per week; NOW THEREFORE, the City and EDMONDS EMPLOYEE ASSOCIATION, LOCAL 3517 (AFSCME COUNCIL 2) have entered into this Memorandum of Understanding to memorialize the following agreement: The parties will reduce the weekly working hours for one part-time Administrative Assistant position ("Administrative Assistant — Development Services"), which currently has working hours of twenty (20) hours per week, to sixteen (16) hours per week. The remaining four (4) hours per week will be covered by another EDMONDS EMPLOYEE ASSOCIATION, LOCAL 3517 (AFSCME COUNCIL 2) Administrative Assistant position. The job description for this position will remain as it currently is for the "Administrative Assistant — Development Services" position, and it will remain covered by the CBA. The benefits available to this position will be reduced pursuant to the City Personnel Policies. Should there be a change in circumstances that would necessitate increasing the hours of this position to twenty (20) hours per week, the City maintains the right to increase the hours (that have been temporarily reduced from twenty (20) to sixteen (16) as needed. At that point, this MOU would become null and void and the position would be covered by the normal (existing) terms of the CBA. 35 Packet Pg. 155 4.4.b The parties agree that this Memorandum of Understanding is specific to this EDMONDS EMPLOYEE ASSOCIATION, LOCAL 3517 (AFSCME COUNCIL 2) position only and does not set a precedent for future requests for changes in working hours for covered EDMONDS EMPLOYEE ASSOCIATION, LOCAL 3517 (AFSCME COUNCIL 2) positions. This Memorandum of Understanding is effective upon the signature of the CBA by both parties. 36 Packet Pg. 156 4.4.b Memorandum of Understanding Amended to the AGREEMENT by and between CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON and EDMONDS EMPLOYEE ASSOCIATION, LOCAL 3517 (AFSCME COUNCIL 2) Effective January 1, 2018 THIS AMENDMENT is supplemental to the AGREEMENT by and between the CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON (hereinafter the "City") and the EDMONDS EMPLOYEE ASSOCIATION, LOCAL 3517 (AFSCME COUNCIL 2) (hereinafter "EDMONDS EMPLOYEE ASSOCIATION, LOCAL 3517 (AFSCME COUNCIL 2)"). WHEREAS, the parties have ratified a Collective Bargaining Agreement (hereinafter "CBA") effective January 1, 2018 through December 31, 2020; and WHEREAS, Section 7.1.6 of the CBA provides that employees covered by the CBA who maintain a good attendance record shall be eligible for the following incentive for the corresponding annual sick leave usage: Hrs of sick leave used Hrs of vacation earned Hrs of sick leave used Hrs of vacation earned 0 24 13 11 1 23 14 10 2 22 15 9 3 21 16 8 4 20 17 7 5 19 18 6 6 18 19 5 7 17 20 4 8 16 21 3 9 15 22 2 10 14 23 1 11 13 24 0 12 12 And that the use of the earned annual leave days shall be in the year following the year the employee's attendance record has been established. Sick leave absences due to an accepted State Worker's Compensation illness or injury as well as sick leave absences due to Family Medical Leave, shall not be taken into consideration when applying the eligibility standards. Partial hours of sick leave .5 or above will be rounded to the next highest whole number and partial hours of sick leave below .5 will be rounded to the next lower whole number for calculating vacation hours earned; and 37 Packet Pg. 157 4.4.b WHEREAS, under RCW 49.46.210 (Paid sick leave — Authorized purposes — Limitations - "Family member" defined) the Washington State Department of Labor and Industries has interpreted RCW 49.46.210 as rendering unlawful any programs that discourage employees from using sick leave; and WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to remove (suspend) the sick leave incentive provision of the contract until there is either a change in RCW 49.46.210 to permit the use of a sick leave incentive program, or until such time that a court of competent jurisdiction should determine that such a program is lawful; NOW THEREFORE, the City and EDMONDS EMPLOYEE ASSOCIATION, LOCAL 3517 (AFSCME COUNCIL 2) have entered into this Memorandum of Understanding to memorialize the following agreement: The parties agree to suspend the provisions of the Sick Leave Incentive program, as described in 7.1.6 of the parties 2015-2017 collective bargaining agreement, effective upon ratification of this agreement. However these provisions shall be reinstated in the event that either: (a) there is a change in RCW 49.46.210 to permit the use of a sick leave incentive program; or (b) a court of competent jurisdiction determines that such programs are lawful. Additionally, for those employees in the bargaining unit that would have met the "good attendance" record in 2018, under the removed article 7.1.6 (Sick Leave Incentive) in the 2015-2017 collective bargaining agreement, they will each receive the monetary value of the amount of vacation that they would have received in vacation accrual instead paid out to them upon ratification of the contract. This Memorandum of Understanding is effective upon the signature of the CBA by both parties. 38 Packet Pg. 158 4.5 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 06/25/2019 ECC 5.32 and 5.05.060; Park Rules and Dog Rules Staff Lead: Carrie Hite Department: Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services Preparer: Carrie Hite Background/History Staff took recommended changes to the Planning Board in March. In addition, these recommended changes were presented to the PPW committee. This was then presented to the full council, who forwarded to the consent agenda for approval. Staff Recommendation Approve the ordinances on consent. Narrative There are several recommended changes to the Park rules that are being requested. These will assist in operating parks for the safety of all. The changes include the following: 1. Adding a chapter to prohibit smoking/vaping in parks. 2. Add a chapter to prohibit feeding wildlife on waterfront beaches. 3. Changing park hours to read " closed from sunset to sunrise" . 4. Clarifying chapter 5.32.030 about the allowance motor vehicles in parks. 5. Clarifying 5.32.040 to be consistent with our practice. 6. A few smaller housekeeping items. In addition to these recommended changes to the Park rules, staff are also recommending changes to chapter 5.05.060 Dogs on public grounds as it relates to parks. Currently, if someone with a dog wants to follow the rules, they would need to consult the City code to determine where they can walk their dog. Staff are recommending that we allow dogs in all parks, on leash, with the exception of playfields, beaches, playgrounds, the spray ground and school grounds. Currently, the school district is exploring their policy and will work with the City if they would like this amended. The Parks department is prepared to install dog waste stations at all of our parks and encourage dog walkers to pick up after their pets. Attached are the ordinances and strikeout versions for both ECC 5.32 and 5.05.060 as it relates to recommended changes. Attachments: Exhibit 1 to Ordinance Amending ECC 5.32 6.20.19 Packet Pg. 159 4.5 Exhibit 1 to Ordinance Amending ECC 5.05 6.20.19 DRAFT Ordinance amending ECC 5.32 6.20.19 DRAFT Ordinance amending ECC 5.05 6.20.19 Packet Pg. 160 4.5.a 5.32.010 Park closing hours. All parks shall be closed from sunset to sunrise between the heiffs of 10:00 ,. an 6:00 a.w.. each and every day unless otherwise posted by the city park and recreation department. It is unlawful for any person to loiter on, remain in, or otherwise be on said premises between the stated hours unless written permission is granted by the mayor, a department head, or a police officer or firem fighter of the city. 5.32.030 Motor vehicles prohibited from city parks. It is unlawful to operate motor vehicles of every kind and description, whether licensed or unlicensed, speeifiea'll including but not limited to two -wheeled motor vehicles such as mini -bikes, motorcycles., and trailbikes, and batteryoperated vehicles in or on any park, with the exception of Segways being allowed along the waterfront marine walkway; provided, the director of parks and recreation is authorized to post a notice or notices prescribing parking areas, roadways, entrances and exits for motor vehicles to and within said parks which posted areas, and only said areas, shall be open for motor vehicular purposes. The owner and/or operator of any motor vehicle found within or on any said public park, other than in the areas posted as hereinabove provided is guilty of a misdemeanor. 5.32.040 Drinking intoxicants or using controlled substances in public parks prohibited. It is unlawful for any person to consume any intoxicating liquor ^-�-4efi*ed by EGG 5.19.010 or use any controlled substances as defined in Chapters 5.04 and 5.14 of the Edmonds Cites, within any public park, beach or playground within the city of Edmonds whether owned by, leased or otherwise under the supervision of the city, unless authorized by a Special Event Permit. 5.32.045 Smoking and vaping in public parks prohibited. It is unlawful for any person to smoke or light cigarettes, cigars, tobacco, marijuana, or other smoking material, or to use electronic cigarettes or vaping devices within city parks. The director of parks and recreation shall post signs in appropriate locations prohibiting smokingand nd vaping in the city's parks. 5.32.050 Horses and similar animals. Unless otherwise directed by the director of parks and recreation as set forth in ECC 5.05.150, it is unlawful for any person to ride, lead or otherwise permit any horse, j-aeka-Rs—,mule, donkey, burro, p1 and/or bovine animal to be within or on any park unless utilized for ADA purposes. Packet Pg. 161 4.5.a 5.32.100 Fishing pier regulations. It shall be unlawful for any person to violate any of the following regulations on the Edmonds public fishing pier at the Edmonds boat harbor adjacent to Dayton Beach Park: A. No person shall permit any animal to enter or remain on the fishing pier; provided, however, that this section shall not apply to service animals that are being used by bled persons needing an accommodation for the purpose of aiding them going from place to place. B. No person shall use or operate any wheeled vehicle upon the fishing pier, including but not limited to any motor vehicle, bicycle, roller skates., er skateboard, or Se wgway; provided, however, this section shall not apply to authorized police, fire and public works vehicles, wheelchairs being used by handicapped persons and ^.,....iages for- in fan4s carriages/strollers for children. C. No person shall cast fishing tackle of any kind or description, including but not limited to, hooks, lines and/or sinkers, from the fishing pier at any location where signs are posted to prohibit such casting. 5.32.106 Feeding wildlife on city beaches prohibited. No person shall intentionally feed, attract, or artificially sustain wildlife on city beaches. The feeding of indigenous wildlife is prohibited in all city beach areas unless otherwise posted. This section does not apply to authorized feeding_ programs established with the Washington state department of fish and wildlife. Packet Pg. 162 4.5.b 5.05.060 Dogs on public grounds. A. It shall be unlawful for an owner to allow any dog to stray and/or enter with or without a leash or other means of restraint upon any school ground, playfield, playground, sprayground, or any public beach. p OUR �esLVA MMMTe VIINNMraeF. I . Thesoutheastwooded are of City Pafk BE. All dogs pefmitteed sir-afeas designated in s bssee en raj --of this seetion shall be en a leash exeept for- degs pefmit4ed in Marina Beaeh Pa Dogs are permitted in city parks, on the waterfront walkway and on other public property not listed in subsection (A) of this section, and shall Packet Pg. 163 4.5.b be on a leash and in the owner's control at all times. Dogspermitted off leash, and under the owner's control, in the off leash area south of Marina Beach Park. CD. Nothing herein shall be determined to require the posting of notices to exclude animals; provided, however, that such postings may be undertaken at the discretion of the director Eger of parks and recreation. DE. The regulations under ECC 5.05.070 relating to animal waste and the removal and proper disposal of said waste will be strictly enforced. Packet Pg. 164 4.5.c ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING CHAPTER 5.32 ECC ("PARK REGULATIONS") AND ADOPTING NEW SECTIONS THERETO; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND SETTING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, it has come to the attention of the city that its park regulations relating to park hours, motor vehicles, use of intoxicants and controlled substances, the presence of animals, and the use of the fishing pier require updating, and that new regulations relating to smoking and vaping in city parks and the feeding of wildlife on city beaches need to be adopted in order to protect public health and safety, and to protect public property; and WHEREAS, the Edmonds City Council desires to adopt amendments and new sections to ECC 5.32 ("Park Regulations") to address these issues; NOW THEREFORE; THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Chapter 5.32 of the Edmonds City Code is hereby amended to read as set forth in Exhibit 1 (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown in strike thr-o tg ), which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as if set forth in full. Section 2. Severability. If any section, subsection, clause, sentence, or phrase of this ordinance should be held invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance, concerning powers vested solely in the City Council, is not subject to referendum and shall take effect five (5) days after this ordinance or a summary thereof consisting of the title is published. APPROVED: MAYOR DAVE EARLING Packet Pg. 165 4.5.c ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED : CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY: JEFF TARADAY FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE DATE: ORDINANCE NO. Packet Pg. 166 4.5.c SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. of the City of Edmonds, Washington On the day of , 2019, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed Ordinance No. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting of the title, provides as follows: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING CHAPTER 5.32 ECC ("PARK REGULATIONS") AND ADOPTING NEW SECTIONS THERETO; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND SETTING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request. DATED this day of , 2019. CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY 3 Packet Pg. 167 4.5.d ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 5.05 ECC ("ANIMAL CONTROL") RELATING TO DOGS ON PUBLIC GROUNDS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND SETTING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, it has come to the attention of the city that its animal control regulations relating to dogs on public grounds require updating in order to protect public health and safety, and to protect public property; and WHEREAS, the Edmonds City Council desires to adopt amendments to ECC 5.05 ("Animal Control") to address the issues relating to dogs on public grounds; NOW THEREFORE; THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Section 5.05.060 of the Edmonds City Code is hereby amended to read as set forth in Exhibit 1 (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown in s4ike thfetigh), which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as if set forth in full. Section 2. Severability. If any section, subsection, clause, sentence, or phrase of this ordinance should be held invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance, concerning powers vested solely in the City Council, is not subject to referendum and shall take effect five (5) days after this ordinance or a summary thereof consisting of the title is published. �. ... ism MAYOR DAVE EARLING Packet Pg. 168 4.5.d ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY: M. JEFF TARADAY FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE DATE: ORDINANCE NO. Packet Pg. 169 4.5.d SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. of the City of Edmonds, Washington On the day of , 2019, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed Ordinance No. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting of the title, provides as follows: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 5.05 ECC ("ANIMAL CONTROL") RELATING TO DOGS ON PUBLIC GROUNDS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND SETTING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request. DATED this day of , 2019. CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY 3 Packet Pg. 170 4.6 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 06/25/2019 Settlement Agreement and Release Staff Lead: Rob English Department: Engineering Preparer: Megan Luttrell Background/History Staff Recommendation Approve Settlement and Release Agreement Narrative On July 9, 2018, the City received a claim for damages from Jeanie Lyons related to the City's 228th St. Corridor Improvement Project. The proposed multi -party Settlement and Release Agreement will settle the claim with the settlement payment being made by Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and Bitco General Insurance Corporation. Attachments: Settlement Agreement and Release Packet Pg. 171 4.6.a SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE A. Payment, Release & Settlement This Settlement Agreement and Release ("Settlement and Release") is entered into by and between Jeanie Lyons ("Plaintiff'), and the following defendants: State of Washington, a governmental entity ("State of Washington"); Washington State Department of Transportation, an agency of the State of Washington ("Washington DOT"); City of Edmonds, a government entity/municipality ("City of Edmonds"); City of Mountlake Terrace ("City of Mountlake Terrace"), a government entity/municipality; Rodarte Construction, Inc., a Washington corporation ("Rodarte"); Taylor's Excavators, Inc., a Washington corporation ("Taylor's"); and DBE Electric, Inc., a Washington corporation ("DBE Electric"), and their respective parent companies, successors, predecessors, related or affiliated companies, agents, employees, attorneys, owners, members, shareholders, officers, insurers (specifically Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., and BITCO General Insurance Corporation) and any reinsurers, third -party administrators, and assigns. State of Washington, Washington DOT, City of Edmonds, City of Mountlake Terrace, Rodarte, Taylor's, and DBE are referred to collectively as "Settling Parties." Plaintiff and Settling Parties are referred to collectively as the "Parties" and individually as "Party." This Settlement and Release is entered into for the purpose of settling any and all claims, causes of action, damages, expenses, attorney's fees, and suits of any kind or nature that any of the Parties to this Settlement Agreement and Release have now or may have in the future in any way arising out of the incident which occurred on September 17, 2015 as part of the Lakeview Trial Project near Andorra Estates in Mountlake Terrace, Snohomish County, Washington (the "Project"), which is described in a lawsuit filed in Snohomish County Superior Court, case number No. 18-2-08249-3 1 (the "Lawsuit"). The settlement payment(s) to Plaintiff shall be funded as follows: Page 1 Packet Pg. 172 4.6.a SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE a. $43,200 shall be paid by Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. payable to Dann Sheffield & Associates in trust for Jeanie Lyons; and b. $4,800 shall be paid by Bitco General Insurance Corporation payable to Dann Sheffield & Associates in trust for Jeanie Lyons. B. Hold -Harmless Agreement Plaintiff Jeanie Lyons agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the Settling Parties from and against all lien claims, contribution claims, medical expense liens, equitable liens, third - party liens or reimbursement claims for Plaintiff's medical treatment, counseling or therapy expenses, insurance carrier liens, state or federal departments' liens, Medicare, CMS, Medicaid, Social Security, subrogation claims, contribution claims or any other claims arising out of or related to the matter referenced herein. Plaintiff agrees that all liens, including private and/or public healthcare liens, shall be satisfied out of the settlement proceeds and that Plaintiff will provide copies of all lien related letters and lien payment to counsel for the Settling Parties. C. Release of Cross -Claims, Defense & Indemnity Tenders & Insurance Tenders As part of this Agreement, the above -named Parties and their insurers agree to release and dismiss their counterclaims, cross claims, insurance tenders, defense and indemnity tenders and any other claims they have or may have against each other, including but not limited to claims for attorney's fees, costs of defense, indemnity, contractual and extra -contractual insurance claims in any way connected with the matter referenced herein. D. Entire Agreement This Release and Hold -Harmless Agreement contains the entire agreement between Parties and shall be binding upon the Parties and their representatives, employees, managers, agents, assignees, predecessors and successors -in -interest, insurers, and attorneys. E. Governing Law This Settlement Agreement and Release shall be construed and interpreted according to Washington law. Page 2 Packet Pg. 173 4.6.a SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE F. Denial of Liability This Settlement Agreement and Release expresses the full and complete settlement of all claims that have been asserted or could have been asserted between the Parties and represents a compromised settlement of disputed claims. Regardless of the adequacy of the above consideration, the execution, and acceptance of this Settlement Agreement and Release Shall not operate as an admission of liability by any party. G. Confidentiality of Settlement The existence, subject matter, terms, and conditions of this Settlement Agreement and Release, shall be kept strictly confidential, and shall not be directly or indirectly discussed, described or otherwise related by any of the Parties, either orally or in writing, except as may be necessary to their respective legal counsel, tax advisor, reinsurers, administrators, regulators, auditors, accountants, governmental entities, bank institutions, as necessary in a court of law, or as required by law. H. Assistance & Cooperation to Accomplish Dismissal of All Claims with Prejudice The Parties to this Settlement Agreement and Release agree to cooperate fully by promptly signing all documents necessary to effectuate dismissal of the referenced matter herein by the Snohomish County Superior Court. I. Affirmation of Understanding & Acceptance of All Terms I HAVE COMPLETELY READ THIS SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE AND FULLY UNDERSTAND AND VOLUNTARILY ACCEPT IT FOR THE PURPOSE OF FINAL RESOLUTION AND SETTLEMENT OF ANY AND ALL CLAIMS, DISPUTED OR OTHERWISE, FOR THE EXPRESS PURPOSE OF PRECLUDING FOREVER ANY OTHER CLAIMS ARISING OUT OF OR IN ANY WAY CONNECTED WITH THE MATTER REFERENCED HEREIN OR INJURIES OR DAMAGES RELATING THERETO. I ASSUME THE RISK THAT THE CLAIMED DAMAGES MAY WORSEN IN THE FUTURE AND THAT NEW DAMAGES THAT ARE NOT NOW KNOWN MAY DEVELOP. I ACKNOWLEDGE THAT MY INFORMATION REGARDING THE CLAIMS MADE IS SUFFICIENT TO ENTER INTO THIS FINAL RELEASE AGREEMENT. I ALSO ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I Page 3 Packet Pg. 174 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE 4.6.a HAVE HAD REASONABLE AND ADEQUATE OPPORTUNITY TO REVIEW THIS DOCUMENT WITH MY ATTORNEY PRIOR TO SIGNING IT. AGREED TO this day of , 2019. Jeanie Lyons, Plaintiff AGREED TO this day of , 2019. DANN SHEFFIELD & ASSOCIATES Signature: Dann Sheffield, WSBA #6815 Attorney for Plaintiff AGREED TO this day of , 2019. LAW OFFICES OF MARK DIETZLER Signature: Kerri Gettmann, WSBA #49869 Attorney for Defendant DBE Electric AGREED TO this day of , 2019. CLEMENT & DROTZ, PLLC Signature: John E. Drotz, WSBA #22374 Andrew Tingkang, WSBA #45300 Attorney for Defendant City of Edmonds AGREED TO this day of , 2019. FALLON MCKINLEY & WAKEFIELD Signature: R. Scott Fallon, WSBA #2574 Attorney for Defendant City of Edmonds Page 4 Packet Pg. 175 4.6.a SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE AGREED TO this day of , 2019. ROBERT W. FERGUSON ATTORNEY GENERAL Signature: Michael A. Nicefaro, Jr. WSBA #9537 Attorney for Defendants State of Washington and WSDOT c 0 J AGREED TO this day of , 2019. FORSBERG & UMLAUF PS Signature: Robert Novasky, WSBA #21682 Attorney for Defendant State of Washington as L a AGREED TO this day of , 2019. E MIX SANDERS THOMPSON, PLLC as co Signature: Michael K. Rhodes, WSBA #41911 Attorney for Defendant Rodarte Construction, Inc. c 0 AGREED TO this day of , 2019. E PREG O'DONNELL & GILLETT, PLLC a� a Signature: Bennett J. Hansen, WSBA 24205 Attorney for Defendant Rodarte Construction, Inc. Cn c as E AGREED TO this day of , 2019. z a GILLASPY & RHODE, PLLC Signature: Betsy A. Gillaspy, WSBA #21340 Attorney for Defendant City of Mountlake Terrace Page 5 Packet Pg. 176 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE 4.6.a AGREED TO this day of )2019. Signature: GREGORY G. SCHRAG ATTORNEY AT LAW Gregory G. Schrag, WSBA 12413 Attorney for Defendant City of Mountlake Terrace AGREED TO this day of , 2019. Signature: FLOYD, PFLUEGER & RINGER, P.S. Francis Floyd, WSBA #10642 Thomas B. Nedderman, WSBA #28944 Attorney for Defendant Taylor's Excavators, Inc. AGREED TO this day of , 2019. Signature: ZE14NDER LAW, LLP John E. Zehnder, WSBA #29440 Attorney for Defendant Taylor's Excavators, Inc. Page 6 Packet Pg. 177 7.1 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 06/25/2019 Utility Rate Analysis & future adoption of a Utility Rate Ordinance Staff Lead: Phil Williams Department: Engineering Preparer: Megan Luttrell Background/History On June 11, 2019, staff presented this item to the Parks & Public Works committee and it was forwarded to City Council for review and discussion. Staff Recommendation Schedule a public hearing and prepare an ordinance for potential action. Narrative The City of Edmonds operates a combined utility operation which incorporates potable water, sanitary sewer, and storm and surface water management functions. The City received the draft combined utility rate study from its consultant, the FCS Group. The findings show increases in potable water, sanitary sewer, and storm and surface water management utility rates. This funding will help address rising costs including but not limited to: inflation and the rising maintenance and operations costs, wholesale cost increases for potable water from Alderwood Water and Wastewater District, the replacement of aging and failing water/sewer/storm infrastructure as part of the annual replacement projects and upcoming larger capital projects. The rate increases recommended and proposed by staff will make it so that the City will only need to acquire bonds for some of the larger future capital projects. The cost for annual maintenance and replacement projects will be rate funded, thereby resulting in considerable, 40%+ capital project cost, savings to the City. Attachments: Attachment 1 - Edmonds DRAFT Water Rate Model Attachment 2 - Edmonds DRAFT Stormwater Rate Model Attachment 3 - Edmonds DRAFT Sewer RR Model - PAYG Attachment 4 - Edmonds DRAFT Sewer RR Model - $9M Bond Attachment 5 - 2019 Utility Rate Update - Presentation Packet Pg. 178 7.1.a City of Edmonds Water Rate & GFC Model ,= Summary Total Capital Projects $ 4,697,000 $ 2,553,456 $ 2,941,994 $ 3,727,356 $ 3,895,916 $ 4,051,752 $ 4,007,305 $ 4,167,597 $ 4,920,017 $ 3,974,671 $ 4,133,658 Grants and Developer Contributions $ - $ - $ $ - $ $ - $ $ - $ $ - $ - PWTF Loan Proceeds Revenue Bond Proceeds - - Use of Capital Fund Balance 4,697,000 2,553,456 2,941,994 3,727,356 3,895,916 4,051,752 4,007,305 4,167,597 4,920,017 3,974,671 4,133,658 Direct Rate Funding Total Funding Sources $ 4,697,000 $ 2,553,456 $ 2,941,994 $ 3,727,356 $ 3,895,916 $ 4,051,752 $ 4,007,305 $ 4,167,597 $ 4,920,017 $ 3,974,671 $ 4,133,658 Revenues Rate Revenues Under Existing Rates Non -Rate Revenues Total Revenues Expenses Cash O&M Expenses [1] Debt Service System Reinvestment Rate Funded CIP Total Expenses Annual Rate Adjustment Rate Increases Dictated by., Rate Revenues After Rate Increase Net Cash Flow After Rate Increase Coverage After Rate Increases $ 8,674,361 $ 8,725,504 $ 8,776,860 $ 8,828,564 $ 8,880,483 $ 8,932,939 $ 8,985,426 $ 9,038,480 $ 9,091,726 $ 9,145,167 $ 9,199,177 1,538,298 1,371,765 940,642 946,060 951,995 957,496 963,449 969,424 975,351 980,707 986,834 $10,212,658 $ 10,097,269 $ 9,717,502 $ 9,774,624 $ 9,832,478 $ 9,890,435 $ 9,948,876 $ 10,007,903 $ 10,067,077 $ 10,125,874 $ 10,186,011 $ 6,198,021 $ 6,563,441 $ 6,611,060 $ 6,852,790 $ 7,116,241 $ 7,378,191 $ 7,653,880 $ 7,944,657 $ 8,251,180 $ 8,574,646 $ 8,916,397 1,256, 540 1,258,950 1,254,358 1,254,742 1,275,378 1,270,093 1,253,081 1,243,796 1,253,179 1,249,168 1,250,620 2,400,000 2,500,000 2,600,000 2,800,000 3,050,000 3,200,000 3,400,000 3,600,000 3,821,799 3,974,671 4,133,658 $ 9,854,561 $ 10,322,390 $ 10,465,417 $ 10,907,532 $ 11,441,620 $ 11,848,284 $ 12,306,960 $ 12,788,453 $ 13,326,158 $ 13,798,485 $ 14,300,675 Policy Policy Policy Policy Policy Policy Policy Policy Policy Policy Analysis $ 8,674,361 $ 9,161,779 $ 9,676,488 $ 10,220,166 $ 10,794,283 $ 11,292,365 $ 11,813,064 $ 12,358,126 $ 12,928,165 $ 13,524,323 $ 14,041,610 $ 358,098 $ 133,894 $ 16,508 $ 49,550 $ 17,034 $ 46,980 $ 44,588 $ 40,186 $ 780 $ 48,402 3.72 3.60 3.64 3.87 4.03 4.23 4.37 4.60 4.75 4.96 5.09 )perating Fund $ 1,058,098 $ 897,049 $ 913,556 $ 963,106 $ 980,140 $ 1,027,119 $ 1,071,707 $ 1,111,894 $ 1,112,673 $ 1,161,075 $ 1,161,075 ;apital Fund 3,306,123 4,028,315 4,178,223 3,748,722 3,394,584 3,036,877 2,914,745 2,838,338 2,230,266 2,711,394 3,207,591 )ebt Reserve Fund 1,200,608 1,200,608 1,200,608 1,200,608 1,200,608 1,200,608 1,200,608 1,200,608 1,200,608 1,200,608 1,200,608 Total $ 5,564,828 $ 6,125,971 $ 6,292,387 $ 5,912,436 $ 5,575,331 $ 5,264,604 $ 5,187,060 $ 5,150,839 $ 4,543,547 $ 5,073,076 $ 5,569,274 ;ombinedMinimum Target Balance $ 1,869,210 $ 1,928,114 $ 1,962,181 $ 1,991,346 $ 2,023,186 $ 2,054,835 $ 2,088,177 $ 2,123,372 $ 2,145,264 $ 2,159,378 $ 2,171,972 Prepared by FCS GROUP Edmonds DRAFT Wa (425) 867-1802 Packet Pg. 179 7.1.b r r: V 'f. City of Edmonds Stormwater Rate & GFC Model Revenue Requirement Analysis Expenses Cash Operating Expenses $ 2,726,795 $ 2,830,315 $ 2,919,099 $ 3,013,050 $ 3,112,595 $ 3,218,202 $ 3,330,380 $ 3,449,693 $ 3,576,752 $ 3,712,232 $ 3,856,870 Debt Service 756,109 756,991 755,466 753,654 758,532 756,365 723,044 722,625 596,427 601,012 600,619 System Reinvestment 1,250,000 1,750,000 2,100,000 2,500,000 2,600,000 2,750,000 2,900,000 3,050,000 3,300,000 3,450,000 3,600,000 Rate -Funded CIP - - - - - - - - - - - Additions to Meet Minimum Operating Fund Balance - - - Total $ 4,732,904 $ 5,337,306 $ 5,774,565 $ 6,266,704 $ 6,471,127 $ 6,724,567 $ 6,953,425 $ 7,222,318 $ 7,473,179 $ 7,763,244 $ 8,057,489 Revenues Rate Revenue $ 4,462,767 $ 4,473,924 $ 4,485,109 $ 4,496,321 $ 4,507,562 $ 4,518,831 $ 4,530,128 $ 4,541,454 $ 4,552,807 $ 4,564,189 $ 4,575,600 City Utility Tax Revenue 446,277 447,392 448,511 449,632 450,756 451,883 453,013 454,145 455,281 456,419 457,560 Other Revenue 83,944 84,245 79,470 79,686 79,748 80,120 80,213 80,540 80,658 80,996 81138 Total $ 4.992.988 $ 5.005.562 $ 5.013.089 $ 5.025.640 $ 5.038.067 $ 5.050.835 $ 5.063.354 $ 5.076.139 $ 5.088.746 $ 5.101.605 $ 5.114:298 Expenses Cash Operating Expenses (Excluding City Taxes) $ 2,280,519 $ 2,382,922 $ 2,470,588 $ 2,563,418 $ 2,661,839 $ 2,766,318 $ 2,877,368 $ 2,995,547 $ 3,121,471 $ 3,255,813 $ 3,399,310 Revenue Bond Debt Service 565,078 564,642 563,675 562,546 566,588 565,416 563,802 563,062 563,248 567,833 567,441 Additional Coverage Required 141,269 141,160 140,919 140,636 141,647 141,354 140,951 140,766 140,812 141,958 141,860 Total $ 2,986,866 $ 3,088,725 $ 3,175,181 $ 3,266,600 $ 3,370,074 $ 3,473,089 $ 3,582,121 $ 3,699,375 $ 3,825,531 $ 3,965,605 $ 4,108,611 Revenues Rate Revenue (Excluding City Taxes) $ 4,462,767 $ 4,473,924 $ 4,485,109 $ 4,496,321 $ 4,507,562 $ 4,518,831 $ 4,530,128 $ 4,541,454 $ 4,552,807 $ 4,564,189 $ 4,575,600 GFC Revenue 43,240 43,348 43,457 43,565 43,674 43,783 43,893 44,002 44,112 44,223 44,333 Other Revenue 73,594 73,594 73,594 73,594 73,594 73,594 73,594 73,594 73,594 73,594 73,594 Interest Earnings 45,600 36,777 23,215 18,180 16,865 14,732 15,285 28,314 42,314 59,179 76,981 Total $ 4,625,201 $ 4,627,643 $ 4,625,375 $ 4,631,661 $ 4,641,695 $ 4,650,940 $ 4,662,901 $ 4,687,365 $ 4,712,827 $ 4,741,185 $ 4,770,508 Prepared by FCS GROUP Edmonds DRAFT Storm (425)867-1802 Packet Pg. 180 r r: V 'f. City of Edmonds Stormwater Rate & GFC Model Revenue Requirement Analysis Sufficiency Test Driving the Deficiency None Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Maximum Deficiency From Tests $ (260,084) $ 331,744 $ 761,476 $ 1,241,065 $ 1,433,060 $ 1,673,732 $ 1,890,071 $ 2,146,179 $ 2,384,433 $ 2,661,639 $ 2,943,191 less: Net Revenue From Prior Rate Increases - I (426,085) (894,880) (1,410,562) (1,651,405) (1,902,960) (2,165,685) (2,440,055) (2,726,569) (3,025,745 Net Revenue Deficiency $ (260,084) $ 331,744 $ 335,390 $ 346,185 $ 22,498 $ 22,327 $ (12,890) $ (19,505) $ (55,622) $ (64,930) $ (82,554 Plus: Adiustment for Taxes (33.796) 43.108 98.949 161.268 186.217 217.491 245.602 278.882 309.842 345.863 382.449 Rate Revenue at Existing/Adopted Rates $ 4,462,767 $ 4,473,924 $ 4,485,109 $ 4,496,321 $ 4,507,562 $ 4,518,831 $ 4,530,128 $ 4,541,454 $ 4,552,807 $ 4,564,189 $ 4,575,600 Revenues from Prior Rate Increases 426,085 894,880 1,410,562 1,651,405 1,902,960 2,165,685 2,440,055 2,726,569 3,025,745 Rate Revenue Before Current Year Rate Increase $ 4,462,767 $ 4,473,924 $ 4,911,194 $ 5,391,202 $ 5,918,124 $ 6,170,237 $ 6,433,089 $ 6,707,138 $ 6,992,862 $ 7,290,758 $ 7,601,345 Required Annual Rate Increase -6.59% 8.38% 8.84% 9.41 % 3.53% 3.89% 3.62% 3.87% 3.64% 3.85% 3.95°% Number of Months New Rates Will Be In Effect 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 ■ 12 S 12 Info: Percentage Increase to Generate Required Revenue -6.59% 8.38% 8.84% 9.41% 3.53% 3.89% 3.62% 3.87% 3.64% 3.85% 3.95% Policy Induced Rate Increases 0.00% 9.50% 9.50% 9.50% 4.00% 4.00% 4.00% 4.00% 4.00% 4.00% impacts ot Rate increases Z11116 zfzllr rizz zilizi ZTZ4r r rZ;Ilzs Rate Revenues After Rate Increase $ 4,462,767 $ 4,898,947 $ 5,377,757 $ 5,903,366 $ 6,154,849 $ 6,417,046 $ 6,690,412 $ 6,975,424 $ 7,272,577 $ 7,582,389 $ 7,901,239 Full Year Rate Revenues After Rate Increase 4,462,767 4,898,947 5,377,757 5,903,366 6,154,849 6,417,046 6,690,412 6,975,424 7,272,577 7,582,389 7,901,239 Additional Taxes Due to Rate Increases City Utility Taxes $ - $ 42,502 $ 89,265 $ 140,704 $ 164,729 $ 189,821 $ 216,028 $ 243,397 $ 271,977 $ 301,820 $ 332,564 Excise Taxes 6,375 13,390 21,106 24,709 28,473 32,404 36,510 40,797 45,273 49,885 Total $ - $ 48,878 $ 102,655 $ 161,810 $ 189,438 $ 218,295 $ 248,433 $ 279,907 $ 312,774 $ 347,093 $ 382,449 Net Cash Flow After Rate Increase $ 260,084 $ 44,401 $ 28,519 $ 4,170 $ 24,789 $ 6,188 $ 21,781 $ 7,884 $ 22,563 $ 9,467 '. Coverage After Rate Increase 4.15 4.72 5.38 6.14 6.36 6.64 6.94 7.26 7.58 7.85 8.19 Operating Reserve Ending Balance $ 710,084 $ 391,713 $ 406,124 $ 410,294 $ 435,083 $ 441,270 $ 463,051 $ 470,935 $ 493,498 $ 502,965 $ 502,965 Operating Reserve Target Balance $ 281,160 $ 293,785 $ 304,593 $ 316,038 $ 328,172 $ 341,053 $ 354,744 $ 369,314 $ 384,839 $ 401,402 $ 419,093 # of Days of Cash Operating Expenses 114 Days 60 Days 60 Days 58 Days 60 Days 58 Days 59 Days 57 Days 58 Days 56 Days 54 Days Prepared by FCS GROUP Edmonds DRAFT Storm (425) 867-1802 Packet Pg. 181 ,.Y'_> City of Edmonds Sewer Rate & GFC Model Summary Total Sewer Capital Projects 3,938,680 2,459,749 2,533,541 2,634,882 2,740,278 8,849,889 2,963,885 3,082,440 3,205,738 3,333,967 18,467,326 Funding Sources for Sewer Capital Projects Grants/Outside Funding Sources $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Debt Proceeds - - - - - - - - - - - Capital Fund Balance 3,938,680 2,459,749 2,533,541 2,634,882 2,740,278 7,662,728 2,963,885 3,082,440 3,205,738 3,333,967 18,467,326 Rates - - - - - 1,187,161 - - - - - Total $ 3,938,680 $ 2,459,749 $ 2,533,541 $ 2,634,882 $ 2,740,278 $ 8,849,889 $ 2,963,885 $ 3,082,440 $ 3,205,738 $ 3,333,967 $ 18,467,326 Total WWTP Capital Projects $ 2,434,187 $ 7,500,000 $ 7,500,000 $ 350,000 $ 350,000 $ $ - $ $ - $ $ Funding Sources for WWTP Capital Projects Grants/Outside Funding Sources $ 10,000 $ - $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ $ $ $ $ $ Miscellaneous (Biosolids, Lynnwood, Etc.) 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 Debt Proceeds - - - - Use of Capital Fund Balance 79,703 - - - - Intergovernmental Contributions 2,329,484 7,485,000 7,385,000 335,000 350,000 Total Funding Sources $ 2,434,187 $ 7,500,000 $ 7,500,000 $ 350,000 $ 350,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ Rate Revenues Under Existing Rates $ 8,408,534 $ 8,450,577 $ 8,492,830 $ 8,535,294 $ 8,577,970 $ 8,620,860 $ 8,663,964 $ 8,707,284 $ 8,750,821 $ 8,794,575 $ 8,838,548 Contributions from Agencies for WWTP O&M 2,562,165 2,651,724 2,746,107 2,845,722 2,950,986 3,062,357 3,180,335 3,305,468 3,438,355 3,579,652 3,730,078 Contributions from Agencies for WWTP Debt Service 125,950 126,168 126,429 109,670 73,894 73,406 73,707 73,895 - - - Non -Rate Revenues 853,034 857,238 861,463 865,709 869,977 874,266 878,576 882,908 887,262 891,637 896,035 Total Revenues $ 11,949,683 $ 12,085,706 $ 12,226,828 $ 12,356,394 $ 12,472,827 $ 12,630,889 $ 12,796,583 $ 12,969,556 $ 13,076,437 $ 13,265,864 $ 13,464,660 Expenses Cash O&M Expenses $ 7,907,334 $ 8,140,402 $ 8,390,137 $ 8,652,735 $ 8,929,190 $ 9,220,588 $ 9,528,116 $ 9,853,070 $ 10,196,872 $ 10,561,075 $ 10,947,379 Sewer Debt Service 1,298,188 1,294,468 1,295,704 1,297,480 1,278,258 1,281,733 1,273,587 1,213,888 1,194,339 1,197,153 1,198,150 Transfer to WWTP Capital Fund for WWTP Debt Servi, 255,929 256,371 256,902 222,847 150,151 149,159 149,772 150,154 - - - Rate Funded System Reinvestment 2,450,000 2,900,000 3,350,000 3,850,000 4,000,000 4,150,000 4,350,000 4,600,000 4,850,000 5,050,000 5,200,000 Rate Funded CIP - - - - - 1,187,161 - - - - - Additions to Operating Reserve - - - - - - 4,327 - - - - Total Expenses $ 11,911,451 $ 12,591,242 $ 13,292,743 $ 14,023,062 $ 14,357,599 $ 15,988,642 $ 15,305,801 $ 15,817,112 $ 16,241,211 $ 16,808,228 $ 17,345,529 Annual Rate Adjustment 0.00% 7.00% 7.00% 7.00% 7.00% 7.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% Rate Increases Dictated by: Policy Policy Policy Policy Policy Policy Policy Policy Policy Policy Analysis Rate Revenues After Rate Increase $ 8,408,534 $ 9,042,117 $ 9,723,441 $ 10,456,102 $ 11,243,969 $ 12,091,202 $ 12,516,208 $ 12,956,153 $ 13,411,561 $ 13,882,978 $ 13,259,651 Net Cash Flow After Rate Increase 38,232 13,722 14,322 19,427 455,456 (311,468) 876,628 882,122 926,449 924,263 - Coverage After Rate Increases 3.52 3.81 4.15 4.52 5.06 5.56 5.73 5.86 6.16 6.35 5.72 Fund Balances 2019 2020 2021 2022i i i Operating Fund 1,355,974 1,369,696 1,384,018 1,403,445 1,517,742 1,206,274 1,614,134 1,668,968 1,722,010 1,781,622 1,781,622 Sewer Capital Fund 8,636,246 5,075,589 1,890,372 2,638,384 3,777,633 - 1,535,206 3,585,307 5,840,892 8,195,245 2,230,739 WWTP Capital Fund - - - - - - - - - - - Capital Project Sinking Fund - 700,000 1,410,500 2,131,658 2,863,632 3,606,587 4,360,686 5,126,096 5,902,987 6,691,532 - Bond Reserve 1,150,177 1,150,177 1,150,177 1,111,347 1,111,347 1,111,347 1,111,347 1,111,347 1,111,347 1,111,347 1,111,347 Total $ 11,142,397 $ 8,295,462 $ 5,835,067 $ 7,284,833 $ 9,270,355 $ 5,924,208 $ 8,621,373 $ 11,491,718 $ 14,577,236 $ 17,779,746 $ 5,123,708 Combined Minimum Target Balance $ 2,167,157 $ 2,194,811 $ 2,225,420 $ 2,218,695 $ 2,249,653 $ 2,285,526 $ 2,321,948 $ 2,363,073 $ 2,402,854 $ 2,447,563 $ 2,494,771 FCS GROUP Edmonds DRAFT Sewer RR Model - PAYG (425) 867-1802 Summary Packet Pg. 182 ,.Y'_> City of Edmonds Sewer Rate & GFC Model Rp� Summary 2020 2021 2022i i i Total Sewer Capital Projects 3,938,680 2,459,749 2,533,541 2,634,882 2,740,278 8,849,889 2,963,885 3,082,440 3,205,738 3,333,967 18,467,326 Funding Sources for Sewer Capital Projects Grants/Outside Funding Sources $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Debt Proceeds - - - - - - - - - - - Capital Fund Balance 3,938,680 2,459,749 2,533,541 2,634,882 2,740,278 8,849,889 2,963,885 3,082,440 3,205,738 3,333,967 18,467,326 Rates - - - - - - - - - - - Total $ 3,938,680 $ 2,459,749 $ 2,533,541 $ 2,634,882 $ 2,740,278 $ 8,849,889 $ 2,963,885 $ 3,082,440 $ 3,205,738 $ 3,333,967 $ 18,467,326 Total WWTP Capital Projects $ 2,434,187 $ 7,500,000 $ 7,500,000 $ 350,000 $ 350,000 $ $ - $ $ - $ $ Funding Sources for WWTP Capital Projects Grants/Outside Funding Sources $ 10,000 $ - $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ $ $ $ $ $ Miscellaneous (Biosolids, Lynnwood, Etc.) 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 Debt Proceeds - 4,154,057 4,154,057 - Use of Capital Fund Balance 79,703 - - - - Intergovernmental Contributions 2,329,484 3,330,943 3,230,943 335,000 350,000 Total Funding Sources $ 2,434,187 $ 7,500,000 $ 7,500,000 $ 350,000 $ 350,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ Rate Revenues Under Existing Rates $ 8,408,534 $ 8,450,577 $ 8,492,830 $ 8,535,294 $ 8,577,970 $ 8,620,860 $ 8,663,964 $ 8,707,284 $ 8,750,821 $ 8,794,575 $ 8,838,548 Contributions from Agencies for WWTP O&M 2,562,165 2,651,724 2,746,107 2,845,722 2,950,986 3,062,357 3,180,335 3,305,468 3,438,355 3,579,652 3,730,078 Contributions from Agencies for WWTP Debt Service 125,950 126,168 296,678 450,167 414,391 413,903 414,205 414,393 340,498 340,498 340,498 Non -Rate Revenues 853,034 857,238 861,463 865,709 869,977 874,266 878,576 882,908 887,262 891,637 896,035 Total Revenues $ 11,949,683 $ 12,085,706 $ 12,397,077 $ 12,696,892 $ 12,813,324 $ 12,971,386 $ 13,137,081 $ 13,310,053 $ 13,416,935 $ 13,606,361 $ 13,805,158 Expenses Cash O&M Expenses $ 7,907,334 $ 8,140,402 $ 8,390,137 $ 8,652,735 $ 8,929,190 $ 9,220,588 $ 9,528,116 $ 9,853,070 $ 10,196,872 $ 10,561,075 $ 10,947,379 Sewer Debt Service 1,298,188 1,294,468 1,295,704 1,297,480 1,278,258 1,281,733 1,273,587 1,213,888 1,194,339 1,197,153 1,198,150 Transfer to WWTP Capital Fund for WWTP Debt Servi, 255,929 256,371 602,844 914,732 842,036 841,044 841,657 842,039 691,885 691,885 691,885 Rate Funded System Reinvestment 2,450,000 2,800,000 3,000,000 3,250,000 3,700,000 4,150,000 4,350,000 4,600,000 4,850,000 5,050,000 5,200,000 Rate Funded CIP - - - - - - - - - - - Additions to Operating Reserve - - - - - - - - - - - Total Expenses $ 11,911,451 $ 12,491,242 $ 13,288,686 $ 14,114,948 $ 14,749,484 $ 15,493,366 $ 15,993,360 $ 16,508,998 $ 16,933,096 $ 17,500,113 $ 18,037,414 Annual Rate Adjustment 0 00', • 00', . ii', • 00', . 0i', • 00', 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% Rate Increases Dictated by: Policy Policy Policy Policy Policy Policy Policy Policy Policy Policy Analysis Rate Revenues After Rate Increase $ 8,408,534 $ 8,957,611 $ 9,542,543 $ 10,165,671 $ 10,829,490 $ 11,536,655 $ 11,942,169 $ 12,361,936 $ 12,796,458 $ 13,246,254 $ 13,659,954 Net Cash Flow After Rate Increase 38,232 39,542 29,835 13,098 40,236 37,521 21,346 9,128 35,121 13,955 - Coverage After Rate Increases 3.52 3.75 3.23 2.93 3.19 3.43 3.51 3.60 3.74 3.85 3.94 Fund Balances 2019 2020 2021 2022i- 2025 2026i Operating Fund 1,355,974 1,392,846 1,422,681 1,435,779 1,476,015 1,513,536 1,534,882 1,544,010 1,579,131 1,593,086 1,593,086 Sewer Capital Fund 8,636,246 7,087,981 5,692,671 5,897,717 6,444,698 1,519,910 2,609,146 3,848,068 5,234,187 6,714,788 728,076 WWTP Capital Fund - - - - - - - - 0 0 0 Capital Project Sinking Fund - 700,000 1,410,500 2,131,658 2,863,632 3,606,587 4,360,686 5,126,096 5,902,987 6,691,532 - Bond Reserve 1,150,177 1,496,119 1,842,062 1,803,232 1,803,232 1,803,232 1,803,232 1,803,232 1,803,232 1,803,232 1,111,347 Total $ 11,142,397 $ 10,676,946 $ 10,367,914 $ 11,268,386 $ 12,587,577 $ 8,443,264 $ 10,307,946 $ 12,321,406 $ 14,519,537 $ 16,802,638 $ 3,432,508 Combined Minimum Target Balance $ 2,167,157 $ 2,540,753 $ 2,959,956 $ 2,995,881 $ 3,026,840 $ 3,062,712 $ 3,099,134 $ 3,140,259 $ 3,180,040 $ 3,224,750 $ 2,580,071 FCS GROUP Edmonds DRAFT Sewer RR Model - $9M Bond (425) 867-1802 Summary R; fA tip d O W 3 d Cl) t- LL Q L3 N C O E W r L V R r r Q Packet Pg. 183 City of Edmonds June 019 FCS CROUP Solutions -Oriented Consulting Packet Pg. 184 s;> Age n d? Overview Discussion of Key Assumptions Review of Draft Results/Scenarios Water Stormwater Sewer Sample Bill Comparison Questions/Discussion Pa e 2 Packet Pg. 185 Overview of Utility Rate Stud S 7.1.e Process y. ------------------------------------------------------------------ Forecast Establish - Costs & Fiscal Policies ' - • Revenues `---------------------------------I-----------�--------------------% • • ` Focus for today's session Costs by Function Fixed Charges Costs by Customer Class Volume Charges LO _ E a w _ E a Pa e 3 Packet Pg. 186 S 7.1.e Overview of Revenue Requirement Anal Defines "cost -based rates" as rates based on aggregate obligations Operating costs Capital project expenditures Debt service payments Other financial needs Establishes a multi -year financial plan beyond the current budget cycle Key Elements of Revenue Requirement Analysis: Defining revenues and expenses Developing capital funding strategy Establishing fiscal policy "framework" Pa e 4 Packet Pg. 187 Key Assumptions Annual Cost Inflation ■ General (CPI): 2.5% ■ Benefits:10.0% ■ Water Purchase Costs: — 19% in 2020; 8% in 2021; 5%+/- per year thereafter ■ Construction Costs: 4.0% Annual Growth ■ Water/Sewer: z 85 ERUs per year ■ Stormwater: z 55 ESUs per year Operating Forecast ■ Generally based on 2019 — 2020 Budget — Adjusted for inflation in future years — Taxes computed on projected revenues Pa e 5 Packet Pg. 188 Utility Policies (Goals) Rate analysis policy on a 3 year cycle to: Improve ability to weather financial cycles, risks and disruptions Stabilize rates over time Account for changes that are outside or control (Alderwood Rates) Account for large future projects Capital Fund Policy Meet all utility financial obligations `Pay as you go' Rate funding for replacement/maintenance give significant savings to the program. Repayment of Interest on a $10M bond at 4.5% over lifetime is approx $5.2M* Avoid deferral of fiscal maintenance responsibilities Keep intergenerational equity Target includes reserves for R&R, Cost overruns, and Emergencies Accounts for seasonal fluctuations in spending *Approx. $4.31VI in 2019 $ using 2.5%CPI (43% total project cost savings) FCS -... . . , Solutions -Oriented Consulting Setting up policies (exam 7.1.e les) Operating Reserve Minimum cash reserve to accommodate varied revenue and expenditure timing Capital Reserve To meet emergency repairs, unanticipated capital, and project cost overruns Replacement Reserve Rate funded capital — annual basis. Funding (RRF) Equipment Reserve To fund ongoing vehicle and equipment replacement Debt Service Coverage Compliance with existing debt covenants and maintain credit worthiness for future debt needs Revenue Sufficiency Set rates to meet the total annual financial obligations of the utility and be self supporting Policy Targetr Water = 90; Sewer = 45-90 0 Storm/Solid Waste = 30 Days 0 1-2% of capital assets (origin. 0 N cost) L a Original Cost Depreciation; Replacement Cost Depreciatic Estimated replacement value Target 2.0 or higher N Minimum 1.25 Rates shall be set to cover 0&I debt service, reserves and fisc a policy achievement s ea Q Pa e 7 Packet Pg. 190 9AlQ Wnfor Pqfac flne-r-f I IcInt a r $100.00 $94.15 $94.15 c 0 $90.00 2 $78.87 $77.65 $80.00 $72.16 $70.00 $66.55 $65.47 0 :r $60.00 $52.73 a� $50.00 $49 47 $44.82 $44.69 $44.44 $41.88 a` $$38.73 40.00 , m $30.00 $20.00 N R $10.00 r °� ae �'� \�� �a oa N \�� �aa'` ����a \`�a� OLD \\��0'` �h��� OJa�o O\��� a�° ��° � P CD a Pa e 8 Packet Pg. 191 s;> C a ital Needs Forecast — Water Capital Costs by Year $5.0 $4.5 $4.0 _ $3.5 — $3.0 $2.5 $2.0 $1.5 $1.0 $0.5 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Capital Funding Strategy $21,867,000 in capital projects from 2019 - 2024 Water Mains: $20,072,000 Reservoirs: $1,795,000 Cash resources are expected to fully cover the projected capital costs Reflects "pay-as-you-go" (cash -only) funding philosophy Pa e 9 Packet Pg. 192 Water Revenue Reauirement Forecast $15.0 $12.0 C $9.0 M $6.0 $3.0 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 0&M Expenses Reserve Funding Debt Service System Reinvestment —Revenue @ Existing Rates —Revenue @ Proposed Rates Rate increases are needed to generate funding for capital needs (system reinvestment) Pa e 10 Packet Pg. 193 •:;> Water Financial Plan Scenarios 2016 Study Proiected 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Annual Water Rate Increase 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% Projected AWWD Rate Increase 9.9% 3.1% 5.3% 5.3% 5.3% Projected Water Purchase Costs $ Millions $2.0 $2.1 $2.2 $2.3 $2.4 Alderwood WWD rate increases are higher than previously projected Cumulative projected 2019 — 2024 increase is 63% (was 38% in 2016 Study) ($500,000) Pa e 11 Packet Pg. 194 •:;> 2019 Storm Rates $50.00 $45.00 $43.06 $40.00 $35.00 $30.00 $25.00 $20.00 $15.00 $10.00 $5.00 �NZ $24.14 1 ERU $21.78 $21.57 0 0 $19.34 $18.90 C;�,o 6\,,-J $16.96 $16.56 Q eo 016 $13.91 $11.45 $7.26 °a � a°� �J\e, �°°a o� a Pa e 12 Packet Pg. 195 s;> C a ital Needs Forecast - Capital Costs by Year $7.0 $6.0 $5.0 c $4.0 R $3.0 $2.0 $1.0 $- 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Stormwater Capital Funding Strategy Grants $6,900,450 Loans 26% $408,750 1% Leg. App. $515,000 2% $26,807,000 in capital projects from 2019 - 2024 Cash resources are expected to cover � 99% of the projected capital costs Reflects "pay-as-you-go" (cash -only) funding philosophy City received $545,000 loan from Snohomish County Public Works Assistance Fund Part of loan already drawn ($408,750 of proceeds remaining) • Increases stormwater utility's annual debt service by z $33,000 FCS -..-13 Packet Pg. 196 GRD Solutions -Oriented Consulting $8.0 y $6.0 C 0 =_ $4.0 $2.0 S 7.1.e Stormwater Revenue Requirement Forecast ' "' 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 0&M Expenses Debt Service 6-1 System Reinvestment Reserve Funding —Revenue @ Existing Rates —Revenue @ Proposed Rates Annual Stormwater Rate Increase 9.5% 9.5% 9.5% 4.0% 4.0% Monthly Single -Family Bill $ 77.18 $18.81 $20.60 $22.56 $23.46 $24.40 Tax $1.72 $1.88 $2.06 $2.26 $2.35 $2.44 Total $18.09 $20.69 $22.66 $24.82 $25.81 $26.84 Rate increases are needed to generate funding for capital needs (system reinvestment) a Pa e 14 Packet Pg. 197 Tw Stormwater Financial Plan Scenarios 2016 Study Proiected 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Annual Stormwater Rate Increase 7.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% System Reinvestment Funding ($ Thousands) $1,800 $1,950 $2,050 $2,100 $2,100 Debt Service $ Thousands $671 $670 $669 $675 $673 Compared to 2016 Study, Cumulative net cash requirement for 2020 — 2024 CIP increased by $3.1 million $1.7 million in additional system reinvestment funded from 2020 — 2024 Debt service is z $85,000 per year higher, due to $33,000 per year for new Snohomish County Public Works Assistance Fund loan $52,000 per year for 2013 Bond payment (previously included in sewer debt service) Pa e 15 Packet Pg. 198 19 Sewer Rates 110ccf Usaae $160.00 $144.80 $140.00 $120.00 $107.33 $100.00 $80.00 $76.06 $72 48 $70.15 $65.21 $63.27 $59.50 $59.48 $60.00 $49.44 $48.93 $48.02 $48.00 $39.10 $40.00 $20.00 \e a�a �e� �p '�°� `a° a� �e °tea ���� °°a oe- o aka �0� 0 -\"-°° D�J P � r 0 c 0 :r c a� N L a m a m r cv r on 0 N LO a� u a c a� a Pa a 16 Packet Pg. 199 _ olr r 0,v S 7.1.e s;> C a ital Needs Forecast — SewL-lll Capital Costs by Year $12.0 — $10.0 — $8.0 - $6.0 - $4.0 $2.0 $- 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Capital Funding Strategy Grants/Misc, $170,000 1% Other Agencie $8,801,000 210/0 Cash $32,320,000 $41,291,000 in capital projects from 2019 - 2024 WWTP Projects: $18,134,000 Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer: $6,665,000 Sewer Mains: $16,417,000 Lift Station No. 1 Study: $75,000* *Excludes $15 m N replacement cost expected to occu Z within 10 years r Cash resources are expected to fully cover the projected capital costs w Reflects "pay-as-you-go" (cash -only) funding philosophy E - Olympic View WSD, Mountlake Terrace, Ronald WWD pay for z 49% of net WWTP costs a FCS - .. Packet Pg. Solutions -Oriented Consulting $15.0 o $12.0 ,;'.MllX1 $6.0 $3.0 Sewer Revenue Requirement Forecast 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 0&M Expenses Debt Service System Reinvestment Reserve Funding —Revenue @ Existing Rates —Revenue @ Proposed Rates Annual Sewer Rate Increase 7.0% 7.0% 7.0% 7.0% 7.0% Monthly Single -Family Bill (Per Unit) $43.65 $46.71 $49.98 $53.48 $57.22 $61.23 Tax $4.37 $4.67 $5.00 $5.35 $5.72 $6.12 Total $48.02 $51.38 $54.98 $58.83 $62.94 $67.35 Rate increases are needed to generate funding for capital needs (system reinvestment) Pa e 18 Packet Pg. 201 7.1.e Sewer Financial PI narios :. • , , . Proposed IF2023 Proiected 2020 2021 2022 2024 Annual Sewer Rate Increase 5.0% 5.0% 5.0% 5.0% 5.0% System Reinvestment Funding ($ Thousands) $2,700 $2,650 $2,700 $3,050 $3,350 Debt Service $ Thousands $1,551 $1,903 $2,183 $2,105 $2,122 2016 Study Proiected 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Annual Sewer Rate Increase 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% System Reinvestment Funding ($ Thousands) $1,250 $1,500 $1,900 $2,100 $2,500 Debt Service $ Thousands $1,604 $1,605 $1,572 $1,479 $1,481 2019 — 2024 CIP is $24.5 million higher in current study than projected in 2016 study WWTP improvements ($15 m), Lake Ballinger TS ($6 m), Dayton Main Replacement from 3rd — 91" ($3.4 m) Rate increases reflect planned replacement of Lift Station 1 within 10 years ($15m); not included in 2016 study FC -..- 19 Packet Pg. U Solutions -Oriented Consulting Rate Model Comparison 2020 to 2029 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 ***2029 Pay as you go 7.00% 7.00% 7.00% 7.00% 7.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% -4.97% Bond $9M @4.5%* 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 4.50% 4.50% 4.00% 4.00% 2.87% Bond $9M @3.5%** 5.00% 5.00% 4.50% 4.50% 4.50% 4.50% 4.50% 4.50% 4.50% 4.14% * Long term rate assumption per FCS Group (model is a long term view on market trends) ** Current Rate assumption per discussions with NW Municipal (Consultant City uses for Bonding) *** Does not factor in future large projects after LS#1 Pa e 20 Packet Pg. 203 t 7.1.e '•') 2019 Total Bill — 3/4 Single -Family lOccf* r 0 A 300 $265.51 c 250 G $193.22 .r 200 $175.43 150 $174.38 $158.61 $136.25 $132.38 $131.61 $129.77 120.48 118.40 $ $ $104.72 a 100 50 Q 0 y r _'\e pia fro awe a�� o LO E M * Rates assume 10 ccf/month usage for water/sewer as applicable ** Has not had a rate adjustment in at least the past 6 years. a *** 55% sewer rate increase expected per sewer comp plan and rate analysis E **** 10% total increase expected in 2020 ***** 10% increases in storm rates for 2020 and 2021 a a_� - Pae21 ■ ' Packet Pg. 204 :;: 202 300 $273.48 1 Total Bill — 3/4" Sinqle-Famil 250 $199.01 200 $180.69 150 100 50 0 $179.61 $163.37 $140.33 $140.02 e�'` oa`� 5 o� �o 10ccf $135.56 $133.66 $124.09 $121.95 $107.86 * Rates assume 10 ccf/month usage for water/sewer as applicable * Rates assume 3% rate increases for each year after 2019 for all other jurisdictions * Edmonds rates increased per recommendations FCS GROU Solutions -Oriented Consulti 2021 Total Bill — 3/4" Sinqle-Famil $300.00 $281.68 $250.00 $200.00 $150.00 $100.00 $50.00 10ccf $204.98 $186.11 $185.00 $168.27 $147.18 $144.54 $0 139.63 $13 7 $127.82 $125.61 $111.10 0 1 0 M °a * Rates assume 10 ccf/month usage for water/sewer as applicable * Rates assume 3% rate increases for each year after 2019 for all other jurisdictions * Edmonds rates increased per recommendations 'FCS Solutions -Oriented Consul et Pg. 206 :;: 2 $350.00 $300.00 $250.00 $200.00 $150.00 $100.00 $50.00 )22 Total Bill — 3/4" Sinqle-Famil $290.13 10ccf $211.13 $191.70 $190.55 $173.32 $156.63 $148.88 $143.81 $141.80 $131.65 $129.38 $114.43 ea�Ne Ka�a S!e�� �Qa�� \���\e C?�J �\��o 10, Oda �ooa , �N 4o * Rates assume 10 ccf/month usage for water/sewer as applicable * Rates assume 3% rate increases for each year after 2019 for all other jurisdictions * Edmonds rates increased per recommendations a F FCS GROU So[utions-Oriented Consulti uestions I Discussion b- Paae 25 Packet Pg. 208 Senjur Pro ec� lVarjag r (211,235) 502 �2S'g Drrta�t r�; GROUP, •:;> FCS GROUP Solutions -Oriented Consulting Packet Pg. 209 Rate Increases 2010 to 201 Water Sewer Storm 8/1/2010 7.50% 1/1/2010 0% 8/1/2010 1/1/2011 7.50% 1/1/2011 0% 1/1/2011 1/1/2012 7.50% 1/1/2012 0% 1/1/2012 1/1/2013 7.50% 1/1/2013 0% 1/1/2013 1/1/2014 9.00% 1/1/2014 9.50% 1/1/2014 1/1/2015 9.00% 1/1/2015 9.50% 1/1/2015 1/1/2016 9.00% 1/1/2016 9.50% 1/1/2016 1/1/2017 9.00% 1/1/2017 9.50% 1/1/2017 1/1/2018 9.00% 1/1/2018 9.50% 1/1/2018 1/1/2019 9.00% 1/1/2019 9.50% 1/1/2019 r C 0 8.00% 8.00% .2 o 8.00% C N 8.00% a 4.50% CL 4.50% 4.50% 10.00% 10.00% N 10.00%LO E M u a a Pa e 27 Packet Pg. 210 7.2 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 06/25/2019 Indigenous Peoples Land Acknowledgment for Public Meetings Staff Lead: Shane Hope Department: Development Services Preparer: Diane Cunningham Background/History The City Council has been requested to consider having a statement at the beginning of Council meetings to acknowledge that the land that is now part of the City of Edmonds is also the land of the Salish people, who have inhabited it since long before 19th-century settlers arrived. This request was followed by several Council members expressing their interest. Council President Fraley-Monillas also consulted with City staff and asked for more information to be brought to the City Council for consideration. On June 11, the City Council's Planning, Public Safety, and Personnel Committee was briefed on the topic. The Committee approved moving it forward for discussion by the full Council, while also recognizing that outreach to tribal representatives would be taking place. Staff Recommendation Discuss options and propose next steps Narrative Overview Acknowledgment of the traditional Native inhabitants of land is a practice encouraged by various organizations, including the U.S. Department of Arts and Culture. (USDAC is a nonprofit organization, not a federal agency.) The practice is starting to take hold in some U.S., Canadian, New Zealand, and Australian locations. Below are several questions and responses about land acknowledgment. Some of them have been adapted from sources identified in materials that are attached to this memo. (See attachment.) What is land acknowledgment? According to a Canadian students' research group: "A Land Acknowledgment is a formal statement that recognizes the unique and enduring relationship that exists between Indigenous Peoples and their traditional territories." Why acknowledge Native inhabitants of a land area? The USDAC states that acknowledgement is a way of showing respect and correcting the perception that Native peoples are gone from the land or that they have little to offer today's communities. Packet Pg. 211 7.2 Who are the Native peoples of the Edmonds area? In and around modern-day Edmonds, Native peoples include: the Tulalip Tribes, the Snohomish Tribe, the Swinomish Indian Tribal Community, the Suquamish Tribe, and the Stillaguamish Tribe of Indians. All of these are considered to be Coast Salish people. What about all the other people who lived here --for example, Africans brought to this continent against their will, Latinos who were displaced in areas of North America, Japanese -Americans who lost their homes and businesses during the World War II era, and communities of color that have lost their neighborhoods due to gentrification? Shouldn't we acknowledge them too? The USCAC's guide to honoring Native land responds with this: "(f)or more than five hundred years, Native communities across the Americas have demonstrated resilience and resistance in the face of violent efforts to separate them from their land, culture, and each other. " This approach recognizes the especially long-term nature of Native connection to ancestral land. It does not mean that other groups have not been impacted by people of European descent, but that the roots of Native peoples on this land go far back into prehistory and that Euro- American appropriation has been particularly widespread, long-lasting, and significant here. Another approach is to make two statements, first to specifically acknowledge the tribe or indigenous nation that has ancestral ties to the land and a second statement to broadly acknowledge the many people who have been here and were subject to painful losses and discrimination. However, this approach could be viewed as diluting the original idea. A variation on the above approach is to use the Native Land Acknowledgment on a regular basis but, from time to time, do other things to recognize the losses experienced by other people who have been marginalized or oppressed in our society. Do other City Councils in our region make land acknowledgment part of their public meetings? An informal survey of City Council practices in our region has indicated that no city governments currently make acknowledgment a regular part of their public meetings. What acknowledgment statements do other organizations make? Here are some examples: "I would like to begin by acknowledging that we gather today on the ancestral homelands of the Coast Salish Peoples, who lived in the Salish Sea basin, throughout the San Juan Islands and the North Cascades watershed, from time immemorial. Please join me in expressing our deepest respect and gratitude for our indigenous neighbors, the Lummi Nation and Nooksack Tribe, for their enduring care and protection of our shared lands and waterways." (Western Washington University, which tailors the statement to reflect the specific location in which an official university event is being held) "The human story of the North Cascades begins with the original stewards of these lands and watersheds, the Indigenous Nations and their modern descendants.... We offer this acknowledgement as a first step in honoring their relationship with land we share, and a call towards further learning and action, not in place of the authentic relationships with local Indigenous communities, but rather to assist in giving them voice." (North Cascades Institute from its website) "We at Seattle Mennonite church acknowledge that we are on the unceded ancestral lands of the Duwamish people. A people that are still here, continuing to honor and bring to light their Packet Pg. 212 7.2 ancient heritage." (Stated in large letters on the exterior wall of the Seattle Mennonite Church) "I want to start by expressing our gratitude to be hosting this event on the culture -rich indigenous lands of the Coast Salish people. We are committed to working with local tribes to acknowledge their ancestral lands and are honored to do so this evening." (Edmonds Center for the Arts, as read at special events the ECA sponsors) Should the Citv contact a tribal rearesentative before decidine on lanauaee for a statement? While not required, this is a good idea. It respects the people whom the statement is about. That is why representatives from the Edmonds Center the Arts reached out to a Tulalip representative before settling on language for their land acknowledgment. The City of Edmonds has also begun outreach to tribal representatives. Any updated information on this will be reported at the June 25 City Council meeting. What language might the Council propose for land acknowledgment? The City Council could choose (or propose) a version of one of the ideas below -or develop something entirely new. "We would like to open this meeting with an acknowledgment that we are on the traditional lands of the Coast Salish people." "We are committed to working with local tribes to acknowledge their ancestral lands and are honored to do so this evening." (This is excerpted from the ECA's land acknowledgment.) "We are on the traditional homelands to the Coast Salish Tribes. We pay our respect to elders past and present." (This was suggested in a public comment at the April 16, 2019 City Council meeting.) What methods could the City of Edmonds use to make acknowledgment? Two possible alternatives -but certainly not the only ones --are: Reading a statement at the beginning of Council meetings (which could be done by the Mayor or Council President) Having a statement prominently printed on Council meeting agendas, for example just under the letterhead. If the Citv Council includes a land acknowledgment as cart of its regular meetings. would all other Citv boards and commissions have to do so? No, they would not be required unless the Council adopts a code provision that makes this a requirement. Regardless, boards and commissions could be encouraged to take this step. We understand that the City of Edmonds Diversity Commission is voluntarily planning to acknowledge Native inhabitants and lands at future Commission meetings. Could the City be sued for making a land acknowledgment that speaks only of Native inhabitants (and not other groups)? A City could be sued for almost anything but that doesn't mean the suit would have merit. If this issue is a Council concern, it can be addressed by the City Attorney. Has the City of Edmonds Diversity Commission weighed in on this issue? The Diversity Commission discussed land acknowledgment at its June 5, 2019 meeting but focused on the concept's applicability to the Diversity Commission, not the City Council. Is acknowledgement the end of the story? Packet Pg. 213 7.2 If land acknowledgment is practiced, it may be useful as a way of raising awareness for local community members and of strengthening relationships with tribes. However, it is not a substitute for other actions. Does the Citv of Edmonds currently do anvthine to recognize Native tribes and their interests? Below are examples of the City's current practices to recognize the interests of Native tribes: Notification of City projects and programs under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Outreach to tribal representatives on major studies (for example, regarding the Marsh) Consideration of comments from tribal representatives Participation with tribal representatives on various regional boards and committees. What options should the City Council discuss at the June 25 meeting? 1. Whether to move forward with some kind of land acknowledgment 2. If yes, on #1 above: Whether acknowledgement should be in the form of: (a) a statement read at the beginning of some or all Council meetings; (b) a written statement placed prominently on each City Council meeting agenda; or (c) something else 3. If yes on # 1 above: What the language for a statement should be. NOTE: At the June 25 meeting, options for language will be presented. What are the next steps regarding land acknowledgment? Next steps could include: Possible follow-up with Tulalip or other tribal representative City Council discussion of options Council vote on motion (or resolution) for Land Acknowledgment Attachments: Resources.lnfo Packet Pg. 214 7.2.a HONOR NATIVE LAND: A GUIDE AND CALL TO 0 ACKNOWLEDGMENT Marchers at Standing Rock 2016; Photo by Nicholas Ward We call on all individuals and organizations to open all public events and gatherings with acknowledgment of the traditional Native inhabitants of the land. TOGETHER, WE CREATE. USDAC.US I HELLOG�USDAC.US Packet Pg. 215 7.2.a U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ARTS AND CULTURE HELLOpUSDAC.US I USDAC.US Dear Citizen Artist, We launch this guide in the lead -up to Indigenous People's Day 2017, when each of us is free to choose whether to accept and perpetuate a distorted history or stand for truth and reconciliati-on grounded in acknowledgment. The time is long overdue for everyone to open all public events and gatherings with acknowledgment of the traditional Native inhabitants of the land. Please help to spread this guide, encouraging your colleagues, neighbors, officials, and institutions to adopt this practice as well. The U.S. Department of Arts and Culture is a people -powered department, a grassroots action network inciting creativity and social imagination to shape a culture of empathy, equity, and belonging. We are grateful to all of the partners whose work inspired this guide. Special thanks to the following individuals who offered insight and support in its creation: T. Lulani Arquette (Native Hawaiian), Daniel Banks, Sherry Salway Black (Oglala Lakota), Lori Pourier (Oglala Lakota), Shirley Sneve (Rosebud Sioux), Rulan Tangen (mixed Indigenous heritage), Josh Reid (Snohomish), Tanaya Winder (Duckwater Shoshone/ Pyramid Lake Paiute/Southern Ute) and Larissa FastHorse (Sicangu Nation Lakota) and Ty Defoe (Ojibwe/Oneida) of Indigenous Direction. Thank you to Nicholas Ward, Connie Fitzpatrick, and the Native Arts and Cultures Foundation for use of their photographs, and Keith BraveHeart (Oceti Sakowin: Oglala Lakota), Bunky Echo -Hawk (Pawn ee/Yakama), Marlena Myles (Spirit Lake Dakota), Bryan D. Parker (Muscogee Creek/Choctaw/White Mountain Apache), Remy (Dine), and William Wilson (Dine) for the use of their artwork. Any omissions or errors are the responsibility of the USDAC. Please feel free to be in touch: helloousdac.us. With gratitude, The Z/6D/ 4C TOGETHER, WE CREATE. I Packet Pg. 216 7.2.a TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................................2 WHAT IS LAND ACKNOWLEDGMENT?...........................................................................3 WHY INTRODUCE THE PRACTICE OF LAND ACKNOWLEDGMENT?; A FEW DISCLAIMERS ABOUT ACKNOWLEDGMENT HOWTO ACKNOWLEDGE.................................................................................................5 STEP ONE: IDENTIFY; STEP TWO: ARTICULATE; STEP THREE: DELIVER BEYOND ACKNOWLEDGMENT........................................................................................9 LEARN MORE; BUILD RELATIONSHIPS AND TAKE ACTION; DOWNLOAD ART OR MAKE YOUR OWN!; SPREAD THE WORD; ABOUT THE USDAC; BE IN TOUCH "Before Here Was Here" by Bunky Echo -Hawk (Pawnee/Yakama) TOGETHER, WE CREATE. Q USDAC.US I HELLOO, USDAC.US PAGE 1 Packet Pg. 217 7.2.a INTRODUCTION We were a people before "We the People." Jefferson Keel (Chickasaw). 20th President of the National Congress of American Indians, 2013 IN COUNTRIES SUCH AS NEW ZEALAND, AUSTRALIA, CANADA, AND AMONG TRIBAL NATIONS IN THE U.S., it is co-nmomplace, even policy, to open events and gatherings by acknowledging the traditional Indigenous inhabitants of that land. While some individuals and cultural and educational institutions in the United States have adopted this custom, the vast majority have not. Together, we can spark a movement to make acknowledgment of traditional lands a regular practice at public and private events. Acknowledgment is a simple, powerful way of showing respect and a step toward correcting the stories and practices that erase Indigenous peoples history and culture and toward inviting and honoring the truth. Imagine this practice widely adopted: imagine cultural venues, classrooms, conference settings, places of worship, sports stadiums, and town halls, acknowledging traditional lands. Millions would be exposed -many for the first time -to the names of the traditional Indigenous inhabitants of the lands they are on, inspiring them to ongoing awareness and action. For more than five hundred years, Native communities across the Americas have demonstrated resilience and resistance in the face of violent efforts to separate them from their land, culture, and each other. They remain atthe forefront of movements to protect Mother Earth and the life the earth sustains. Today, corporate greed and federal policy push agendas to extract wealth from the earth, degrading sacred land in blatant disregard of treaty rights. Acknowledgment is a critical public intervention, a necessary step toward honoring Native communities and enacting the much larger project of decolonization and reconciliation. We call on all artists, cultural workers, public officials, educators, administrators, community leaders, organizers, and engaged community members to open all public events and gatherings with acknowledgment of the traditional Native inhabitants of the land. Photo courtesy of Native Arts and Cultures Foundation TOGETHER, WE CREATE. Q USDAC.US I HELLOG►USDAC.US PAGE 2 Packet Pg. 218 7.2.a p�,P aR rM�.y WHAT IS LAND p 000 .` ACKNOWLEDGMENT. s IDC'o. Acknowledgment by itself is a small gesture. It becomes meaningful when coupled with authentic rela l i�i II ai iu informed action. uu� a n5 beginningn Can i . c a—n -111. - IS r,rI-1. F-1. u� of Native sovereignty and cultural rights, a step toward equitable relationship and reconciliation. Join us in adopting, calling for, and spreading this practice Naming is an exercise in power. Who gets the right to name or be named? Whose stories are honored in a name? Whose are erased? Acknowledgment of traditional land is a public statement of the name of the traditional Native inhabitants of a place. It honors their historic relationship with the land. A Land Acknowledgment is a formal statement that recognizes the unique and enduring relationship that exists between Indigenous Peoples and their traditional territories. Laurier Students' Public Interest Research Group, Ontario, Canada http://www.Ispirg.org/knowthetand/ WHY INTRODUCE THE PRACTICE OF LAND ACKNOWLEDGMENT? Photo by Nicholas Ward • Offer recognition and respect. • Counter the "doctrine of discovery" with the true story of the people who were already here. • Create a broader public awareness of the history that has led to this moment. • Begin to repair relationships with Native communities and with the land. • Support larger truth -telling and reconciliation efforts. • Remind people that colonization is an ongoing process, with Native lands still occupied due to deceptive and broken treaties and practices of eminent domain and other mechanisms intended to benefit government or corporate America. • Take a cue from Indigenous protocols, opening up spaces with reverence and respect. • Inspire ongoing action and relationships. TOGETHER, WE CREATE. USDAC.US I HELLOOUSDAC.US PAGE 3 Packet Pg. 219 7.2.a Many countries are far ahead of the United States in adopting this practice. In Australia, New Zealand, and Canada there are protocols, maps, and pronunciation guides readily available. Many universities have made acknowledgment a policy, providing simple templates for students, staff, and faculty. Beginning in 2016, all Toronto public schools began opening their school days with a statement of acknowledgment. The University of Alberta offers this explanation of acknowledgment: To acknowledge the traditional territory is to recognize its longer history, reaching beyond colonization and the establishment of European colonies, as well as its significance for the Indigenous peoples who lived and continue to live upon this territory, and whose practices and spiritualities were tied to the land and continue to develop in relationship to the land and its other inhabitants today. Acknowledgment in these countries is a small part of a more significant commitment to truth and reconciliation —including official government apologies and truth commissions leading to significant public recommendations and reforms. In Australia, many formal events begin with a "Welcome to Country:' While a Land Acknowledgment can be offered by anyone hosting or leading an event, a Welcome to Country is offered by an Indigenous elder or community leader. The custom is to offer compensation for leading this more formal ceremonial welcome. A FEW DISCLAIMERS ABOUT ACKNOWLEDGMENT: • It's simple. And also not so simple. In some cases the traditional inhabitants of a place may be clear. In other cases whom to recognize is much less so. Do your research. While the act of naming traditional inhabitants may not take much time, moving into right relationship requires preparation. • This guide doesn't offer the one right way to acknowledge. What's offered here is not a comprehensive checklist or set of universally acceptable protocols. There are currently 567 federally recognized tribal nations, each with its own history and protocols for welcome and acknowledgment. There are also state - recognized tribes and peoples, including Native Hawaiians who reside on six islands. There is no one way of doing this. • Acknowledgment is made meaningful through specific context and relationship. Whenever possible, the best entry point into the practice of acknowledgment is through relationship and dialogue with Native communities in the area. • The practice of formal welcome and acknowledgment of land is not new. Acknowledgment has long been practiced —typically in much more nuanced, formal, and ceremonial ways —within Indigenous communities. Many artists, activists, presenters, academics, and others have been starting events with acknowledgment for decades. By publishing this guide, we hope to draw on these histories to help spark a movement to make acknowledgment commonplace. • Acknowledgment is but a first step. It does not stand in for relationship and action, but can begin to point toward deeper possibilities for decolonizing relationships with people and place. map shows how that happened over time. Note that Alaska and Hawaii are not included. TOGETHER, WE CREATE. USDAC.US I HELLO@USDAC.US PAGE 4 Packet Pg. 220 7.2.a rrF , HOW TO ACKNOWLEDGe aw Below are suggested steps to acknowledging traditional land at the opening of a public gathering or event. The best way to root this practice in a local context is through dialogue with local Native groups. Not yet .having those relationships doesn't mean VOL! cant begin. STEP ONE: IDENTIFY The first step is identifying the traditional inhabitants of the lands you're on. This task may be complicated by multiple and contested histories of settlement, resettlement, and recognition. Many places are now home to Native people who have called that land home from time immemorial and also to those relocated from elsewhere. The goal of acknowledgment is recognizing and uplifting, not hurting or causing further division. So it is important to proceed with care, doing good research before making statements of acknowledgment. Here are some places you can look online: • Wikipedia entries on many cities document some history of Indigenous inhabitation. Be sure to cross- check what you find there with other sources. • This map of Native Land is one of the more comprehensive maps available: https://native-land.ca/ • The Native Languages site offers breakdown by state, with contact information for local tribes: http:// www.native-languages.org/ In addition to consulting local Native individuals and organizations, you can check to see if there are resources at local universities and colleges, especially those with American Indian/Native/Indigenous Studies centers, programs, and/or departments. If multiple tribal groups claim belonging to the land, consider not naming one particular group or naming all of them. Ideally, this decision should be made through dialogue with local Native elders and culture bearers, respecting their wishes about how they desire to be named. A DEEPER STEP: Identify Native elders and culture -bearers in your region to join in a conversation about how they would like to see this practice take shape locally, particularly how it could be of greatest benefit for their communities. You can use this guide as a jumping- off place for conversation. If you are part of an organization or group, consider offering an honorarium to those who take part in the dialogue. This dialogue could also be a public forum, engaging others who want to learn about this practice. Or you could share a video, transcript, or other reporting to inform and engage the wider community. TOGETHER, WE CREATE. USDAC.US I HELLOOUSDAC.US PAGE 5 Packet Pg. 221 7.2.a STEP TWO: ARTICULATE Once you've identified the group or groups who should be recognized, formulate the statement of acknowledgment you'll share at the beginning of public gatherings. There is no exact script for this. Craft yours after considering several levels of detail you might introduce. At its simplest, an acknowledgment could look like this: "We acknowledge that we are on the traditional land of the People:" Beginning with just this simple sentence would be a meaningful intervention in most U.S. gathering spaces. From there, there are many other elements to bring into acknowledgment: Often, statements specifically honor elders: I would like to acknowledge that this meeting is being held on the traditional lands of the People, and pay my respect to elders both past and present:' Some allude to the caring, reciprocal relationship with land: "I want to respectfully acknowledge the People, who have stewarded this land throughout the generations:" Acknowledgments may also make explicit mention of the occupied, unceded nature of the territory in which a gathering is taking place: "We would like to begin by acknowledging that the land on which we gather is the occupied/unceded/ seized territory of the _ People." "I would like to begin by acknowledging that we are in , the ancestral and unceded territory of the _ People. In Canada it is not uncommon to make mention of the specific treaties by which land was designated to a particular tribal group. You may wish to do additional research to name the moment at which treaties were made as well as when they were broken and land unlawfully taken. The truth is complicated. Beneath the contemporary surface of any site in the United States, there are histories of belonging that have been erased, overlooked, contested and forgotten, all ways to support ideas like "manifest destiny" which justified the conquest of Native lands. Lengthier statements of acknowledgment can center Native communities while also acknowledging the many communities that have contributed to the existing culture of place. For example: Photo by Connie Fitzpatrick TOGETHER, WE CREATE. USDAC.US I HELLOOUSDAC.US PAGE 6 Packet Pg. 222 7.2.a "Every community owes its existence and vitality to generations from around the world who contributed their hopes, dreams, and energy to making the history that led to this moment. Some were brought here against their will, some were drawn to leave their distant homes in hope of a better life, and some have lived on this land for more generations than can be counted. Truth and acknowledgment are critical to building mutual respect and connection across all barriers of heritage and difference. We begin this effort to acknowledge what has been buried by honoring the truth. We are standing on the ancestral lands of the People [if possible, add more specific detail about the nature of the occupied [and]. We pay respects to their elders past and preseni. Please take a moment to consider the many legacies of violence, displacement, migration, and settlement that bring us together here today. And please join us in uncovering such truths at any and all public events" You may choose to begin with a simple statement of acknowledgment and elaborate over time as you learn more, build relationships with members of local Native communities, and grow more comfortable with the practice. "Takunsa Unsikila" by Keith BraveHeart (Oceti Sakowin: Oglala Lakota) DID YOU KNOW? "There are 567 federally recognized Indian Nations (variously called tribes, nations, bands, pueblos, communities and native villages) in the United States... Additionally, there are state recognized tribes located throughout the United States recognized by their respective state governments." Learn more from the National Congress of American Indians TOGETHER, WE CREATE. USDAC.US I HELLO®+USDAC.US PAGE 7 Packet Pg. 223 7.2.a STEP THREE: DELIVER Once you've identified whom to name and practiced your statement (including pronunciation of names), offer your acknowledgment as the first element of a welcome to the next public gathering or event that you host. If in the process of learning about acknowledgment you've built relationships with members of Native communities, consider inviting them to give a welcome before yours. There's a danger that a practice like this becomes just another piece of protocol, delivered flatly and falling on deaf ears. How many times have you spaced out as the flight attendant goes through emergency procedures? Or failed to silence your Ceii phone ever•. though that was requested at the beginning of a show? Acknowledgment should be approached not as a set of obligatory words to rush through. These words should be offered with respect, grounded in authentic reflection, presence, and awareness. As you step up to offer acknowledgment, breathe in awareness of both the present and of the histories that connect you with the people you are naming. Consider your own place in the story of colonization and of undoing its legacy. At your next gathering, try acknowledgment out, see how it feels, observe how or if it shifts the room. Over time, through practice, you'll learn more about what it means and what it opens up for you and others. Statements of acknowledgment don't have to be confined to spoken words. Some artists, scholars, activists, and others have begun to include acknowledgment in email signatures or on websites. Consider using social media to amplify your acknowledgment. For example, post an image or a story of an event where your acknowledgment was offered, tagging it #HonorNativeLand to inspire others.. Any space, three-dimensional or digital, presents an opportunity to surface buried truths and lift up Native sovereignty, priming our collective culture for deeper truth and reconciliation efforts. 'Annual Canoe Journey, Washington" Photo courtesy of Native Arts and Cultures Foundation We are still America. We Know the rumors of our demise. We spit them out. They Die Soon:' Joy Harjo (Muscogee), 2015 Poetic Address to the Nation TOGETHER, WE CREATE. USDAC.US I HELLOeUSDAC.US PAGE 8 Packet Pg. 224 7.2.a BEYOND ACKNOWLEDGMENT Acknowledgment is the beginning. Acknowledgment —and the research required to do it with integrity — should be an invitation to deeper analysis, relationship, and action. "I think we need to start imagining a constellation of relationships that must be entered into beyond territorial acknowledgments. Great, that's awesome you know you're on (for example) Treaty 6 territory. That's great you acknowledge that perhaps the Indigenous view of that treaty, that the land was not surrendered, is correct. Perhaps you understand the tension of your presence as illegitimate, but don't know how to deal with it beyond naming it. Maybe now it is time to start learning about your obligations as a guest in this territory. What are the Indigenous protocols involved in being a guest, what are your responsibilities? What responsibilities do your hosts have towards you, and are you making space for those responsibilities to be exercised? To what extent are your events benefiting your hosts?" — Chelsea Vowel, Metis from the Plains Cree speaking community of Lac Ste. Anne, Alberta http://apihtawikosisan.com/2016/09/beyond-territorial-acknowledgments/ LEARN MORE Take time to learn about the Indigenous history of the land you live on, as well as the contemporary context of Native groups in your region. Search for books, articles, people, and organizations that you can learn from. • Find syllabi online to follow on your own or with a study group. Here is an example of a thoughtful syllabus created in solidarity with efforts at Standing Rock to resist the construction of the Dakota Access Pipeline. • For an overview of Tribal Nations and their historical relationship to the U.S. government, read this primer from the National Congress of American Indians. Educate yourself on the history of settler colonialism and genocide in the United States by reading (or listening to) An Indigenous People's History of the United States by Roxanne Dunbar -Ortiz. Learn about the history of broken treaties in the U.S. and about Indigenous sovereignty movements to correct for past injustices. Read the American Indian Movement's "Trail of Broken Treaties 20 Point Position Paper" here. Read about the Native Hawaiian sovereignty movement here. Read Suzan Shown Harjo's Nation to Nation: Treaties Between the United States and American Indian Nations. Read the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. The United States was one of four nations to vote against Vie declaration when it was first adopted in 2007. It was the last of the four to reverse that in 2010. Where can a Truth and Reconciliation process lead? Check out the calls to action that emerged from Canadas commission. TOGETHER, WE CREATE. USDAC.US I HELLOGUSDAC.US PAGE 9 Packet Pg. 225 7.2.a • Consider that the 2010 Census listed the percentage of urban Native people at 71%. Many Indigenous people are among those seeking or building community in cities. BUILD RELATIONSHIPS AND TAKE ACTION • Find out if there are active Native groups or organizations in or near your community. Learn about their work and see how you can support them. • Be in touch with local Native community members to discern how best to introduce the practice of acknowledgment and explore how that might lead to further dialogue and collaboration. • Look around and ask yourself: are there Native folks present at your events? On your team? On your board? If not, what would it take to begin building those relationships? How might you move from acknowledgment into relationship? If your role involves programming at a cultural or educational institution, how might you ensure that the programming itself represents a commitment to Native voices, stories, and perspectives? • Follow Indigenous leadership an efforts to. resist destruc-tion of land and life_ Read this powerful call to action from Indigenous Women Rising. A FEW ORGANIZATIONS TO CHECK OUT: • Native Arts and Cultures Foundation. Expose yourself to the work of Native artists, poets, musicians, authors, filmmakers working in community. • Indigenous Environmental Network, "an alliance of Indigenous Peoples whose Shared Mission is to Protect the Sacredness of Earth Mother from contamination & exploitation by Respecting and Adhering to Indigenous Knowledge and Natural Law:' • National Congress of American Indians: NCAI "founded in 1944, is the oldest, largest and most representative American Indian and Alaska Native organization serving the broad interests of tribal governments and communities:' • First People's Fund works to "honor and support the Collective Spirit@ of First Peoples artists and culture bearers:' • Vision Maker Media "empowers and engages Native People to tell stories" • Cultural Survival "advocates for Indigenous Peoples' rights and supports Indigenous communities' self- determination, cultures and political resilience:' • Endangered Language Alliance: NYC -based organization that "documents and describes underdescribed and endangered languages, educating a larger public and collaborating with communities" • Indian Country Media Network: Source for Native news. On hiatus, but archive still accessible. DOWNLOAD ART OR MAKE YOUR OWN! Imagine going to a local coffee shop, music venue, grocery store, or even town hall, and finding a sign on the wall acknowledging traditional lands. Sound far-fetched? It doesn't have to be! As part of this campaign to #HonorNativeLands, we partnered with several artists to create downloadable signs that you can customize and post in your community. Signs and posters are available for download from the Honor Native Land Public Folder. You are also invited to make your own signs or posters. Consider partnering with local artists and a local printshop to make a customized set of acknowledgment posters for your community. SPREAD THE WORD Share the guide and call to action. In the Honor Native Land Public Folder there are sample social media posts, signs and other materials that you can use to spread the word about this campaign. Use the hashtag #HonorNativeLand. TOGETHER, WE CREATE. USDAC.US ! HELLOG►USDAC.US PAGE 10 Packet Pg. 226 7.2.a TAKE THE PLEDGE We urge organizations, collectives, institutions, and agencies to publicly commit to practicing traditional Native land acknowledgment. To stand and be counted and to inspire others with your commitment, take the pledge here. ABOUT THE USDAC The U.S. Department of Arts and Culture (USDAC) is a people -powered department —a grassroots action network inciting creativity and social imagination to shape a culture of empathy, equity, and belonging. Since 2014, the USDAC has engaged more than 25,000 artists, activists, and allies in 40, states in arts - based dialogues and actions. By creating opportunities for learning, connection, and collective action at the local and national level, the USDAC works toward a society that affirms the right to culture; values each community's heritage, contributions, and aspirations; and dismantles all barriers to love and justice. For more information and to get involved visit: www.usdac.us. BE IN TOUCH Did this guide inspire you to action? Do you already have stories of success or challenges implementing acknowledgment as a practice at your organization or institution? Do you want to strategize about how to spread the practice of acknowledgment in your region or create a campaign to introduce acknowledgment as official policy in your town or city? We'd love to hear from you. Drop us a line at helloousdac.us. 'Auto Immune Response" by William Wilson (Dine) TOGETHER, WE CREATE. USDAC.US I HELLOGUSDAC.US PAGE 11 Packet Pg. 227 7.2.a HOME (/) WHO WE ARE GET INVOLVED BLOG (/BLOG) 49,11DONATE) APRIL 26, 2018 (/NEWS-LONG/2018/4/26/HONOR-NATIVE- LAND-ARE-YOU-HESITATING-ACKNOWLEDGMENT- FAQS) Honor Native Land. Are You Hesitating? Acknowledgment FAQs Vnews- Long /2o18/4/26/honor- native-land-are-you-hesitating- acknowLedg ment-fags) BLOG (/NEWS-LONG/CATEGORY/BLOC), NEWS (/NEWS- LONG/CATEGORY/NEWS) Back in October, the USDAC launched Honor Native Land: A Guide and Call to Acknowledgment (https://usdac.us/nativeland), calling on all individuals and organizations to open public events and gatherings with acknowledgment of the traditional Native inhabitants of the land. Since then, more than 7,000 people have downloaded the Guide and many have put it advice into practice, with hundreds signing the pledge to make acknowledgment a regular custom. Have you been hesitant about acknowledging Native lands at your event? We hope these FAQs will clear things up! I like the idea, but shouldn't an Indigenous person be the one to offer acknowledgment? I'm not Native American. Cultural democracy —the USDAC's animating principle —says we all share responsibility for a social order of belonging, equity, and justice. If the hard work of confronting and overturning dis-belonging and injustice is left to those most directly affected, everyone else is shirking this collective responsibility. Acknowledgment isn't a favor others do for Indigenous people. just like taking action to stop someone from disrespecting or insulting others on account of their gender, orientation, ethnicity, or religion, acknowledgment is a step toward cultural democracy. I'm really nervous about making a mistake. What if 1 mispronounce something? What if 1 do it wrong? The most basic forms of acknowledgment we recommend in the Guide are very simple, for instance: "I would like to acknowledge that this meeting is being held on the traditional lands of the People, and pay my respect to elders both past and present." It is fairly easy to find the name(s) Packet Pg. 228 pertaining to your region. (The Guide is full of suggestions as to how to research 7.2.a this, connecting with local Native organizations, Indigenous studies programs at universities in your region, and online resources.) Much information is available through this online Native Land map (https://native-tand.ca/); it is often possible to learn correct pronunciation of tribal names by clicking their links on that map. If fear of making a mistake trumps doing the right thing, we're in trouble! If you try acknowledgment with an attitude of sincerity and humility —asking to be corrected if you stumble —most people will respond in kind. tt+ +t +ttt t h• tt tt_+t What about all the other people who lived here —the Africans who were brought against their will to the communities of color pushed out to make way for gentrification? Shouldn't we acknowledge them too? 0 4- S vi m L 0 W t_ :.i Q Packet Pg. 229 The Guide says that "[f]or more than five hundred years, Native communities across the Americas have demonstrated resilience and resistance in the face of violent efforts to separate them from their land, culture, and each other:' They may have been the first on this landmass harmed by colonial policies, but by no means the last. If you wish to broaden your acknowledgment, the Guide also suggests a longer acknowledgment formula: "Every community owes its existence and vitality to generations from around the world who contributed their hopes, dreams, and energy to making the history that led to this moment. Some were brought here against their will, some were drawn to leave their distant homes in hope of a better life, and some have lived on this land for more generations than can be counted. Truth and acknowledgment are critical to building mutual respect and connection across all barriers of heritage and difference. We begin this effort to acknowledge what has been buried by honoring the truth. We are standing on the ancestral lands of the People [if possible, add more specific detail about the nature of the occupied land]. We pay respects to their elders past and present. Please take a moment to consider the many legacies of violence, displacement, migration, and settlement that bring us together here today. And please join us in uncovering such truths at any and all public events." What about more than an acknowledgment: a prayer, ceremony, or performance? Is it okay for me to try for that? There are many possible steps beyond acknowledgment. All should be offered by Indigenous people. When members of one Native people visit the territory of another, they may engage in a formal exchange of greetings, gifts, and blessings. Artists or spiritual leaders whose tribe's traditional lands are the site of your event may be invited to offer a traditional cultural protocol or to acknowledge ancestors with a song, prayer, or ritual. Whether you are non - Native or Indigenous, it is perfectly fine to reach out to local Indigenous organizations or individuals with an invitation like this, so long as it is done respectfully. It is important to offer an honorarium or gift as appropriate to the individual elder, artist, or spiritual leader invited to take part in this way. You say "Acknowledgment by itself is a small gesture. It becomes meaningful when coupled with authentic relationship and informed action." What kind of action? I'm worried that we will be asked to change our programs or staffing or governance in ways 1 can't make happen. Higher-ups could be upset if I open the door to requests they won't grant. The USDAC understands acknowledgement as a beginning, a possible opening to greater public consciousness of Native sovereignty and cultural rights and toward correcting the stories and practices that erase Indigenous people's history and culture, toward inviting and honoring the truth. To bring about equity, belonging, and justice, things have to change. The first steps toward that culture shift are awareness of what has been and what could be and public acknowledgment of those realities. Packet Pg. 230 7.2.a For non -Native organizations, entering into dialogue and relationship with Indigenous people calls for respect and reciprocity, deep listening and truth - telling. There is no immunity from facing these truths. Let us help you strategize about how to proceed: contact us at helloeusdac.us. We would love to hear about your experience with acknowledgment. A future blog will feature acknowledgment stories from across the U.S. Please share texts, photos, or any other material you like that will help others understand your own process of acknowledgment. Just write to us at helloeusdac.us. We'll ask your permission before using your experience in a future blog post. V- 2 LIKES < SHARE What Does A Amp Up Your Local Organizing: USDAC Outpost FAOs (/news-long/2018/5/10/amp-up-your-1 1�tge aFn � Ot t-' YOU? ,httns:, ,http:/, ,httn:/, Enlist as a Citizen Artist Stay tuned to news from the USDAC PRESS (/PRESS- CONTACT US First Name ARCHIVE) (/CONTACT) VIDEO (/VIDEO) AFFILIATES Last Name (/USDAC- BLOG (/NEWS- AFFILIATES) LONG) Email* PARTNERS EVENTS (/PARTNERS) (/CALENDAR) Zip/Postal Code FREQUENTLY Not in the US? DONATE ASKED (/DONATE) QUESTIONS Sign up! (/FAQS) Opt in to updates from U.S. Department of Arts and Culture Sponsored by: U.S. Department of Arts and Culture (https://actionnetwork.org/groups/us- department-of-arts-and-culture) 0 4- S vi m 0 M aD c aD E r Q Packet Pg. 231 7.2.a Audio by websitevoice.com (https://websitevoice.com) Q Packet Pg. 232 https://usdac.us/news-long/2018/4/26/honor-native-land-are-you-hesitating-acknowledgment-faqs 5/5 5/13/2019 #HonorNativeLand - A guide to respectfully acknowledge ancestral lands - Native Arts and Cultures Foundation #HonorNativeLand — A guide to respectfully acknowledge ancestra lands © October 3, 2017 25 Advocacy and Education, Blog The Native Arts and Cultures Foundation is proud to be involved in the U.S. Department of Arts and Culture's (USDAC) Honor Native Land: A Guide and Call to Acknowledgment, released today and dee to wnloafrom the USDAC website. We encourage Native peoples and non -Native allies to share and commit to the practice of #Honortheland. From the USADAC guide: "IN COUNTRIES SUCH AS NEW ZEALAND, AUSTRALIA, CANADA, AND AMONG TRIBAL NATIONS IN THE U.S., it is commonplace, even policy, to open events and gatherings by acknowledging the traditional Indigenous inhabitants of that land. While some individuals and cultural and educational institutions in the United States have adopted this custom, the vast majority have not. Together, we can spark a movement to change that. We call on all individuals and organizations to open public events and gatherings with acknowledgement of the traditional Native inhabitants of the land. Acknowledgment is a simple, powerful way of showing respect and a step toward correcting the stories and practices that erase Indigenous people's history and culture and toward inviting and honoring the truth. Imagine this practice widely adopted: imagine cultural venues, classrooms, conference settings, places of worship, sports stadiums, and town halls, acknowledging traditional lands. Millions would be exposed —many for the first time —to the names o packet Pg. 233 https://www.nativeartsandcultures.org/honornativeland-guide-respectfully-acknowledge-ancestral-lands 2 5/13/2019 7.2.a #HonorNativeLand - A guide to respectfully acknowledge ancestral lands - Native Arts and Cultures Foundation traditional Indigenous inhabitants of the lands they are on, inspiring them to ongoing awareness and action." To download the guide, print, download and customize #Honortheland art, and more, visit https:/LLisdac.us/`—na Live land OWN �> 2017, Advocacy_, CommunityEngagernent in http s:lAvww. n ativea rtsandcul to res. org/h onom ative la nd.guide-respectfu I ly-acknowledge-ancestral-land s Packet Pg. 234 2/2 Land Acknowledgement - Real Rent Duwamish Page 2 "Northwest Film Forum acknowledges that we gather on Indigenous land: the traditional territory of Coast Salish peoples, specifically the Duwamish Tribe (Dkhw Duw'Absh)," Interior wall of Northwest Film Forum in Capitol Hill neighborhood. Packet Pg. 235 https://www.realrentduwamish.org/land-acknowledgement.html Land Acknowledgement - Real Rent Duwamish 7.2.a Page 1 o Real Rent Duwamish Land Acknowledgement Resources Publicly acknowledging the original stewards of the land you are on can be a meaningful way to honor indigenous peoples and resist erasure of their histories. The power of an acknowledgement lies in Iearni.ng as much as you can about local treaties and practices, while working to build accountable relationships. If you want to make a land acknowledgement but aren't sure where to start, here are some local, national, and international resources and examples: Beyond Territorial Acknowledgements U.S. Department of Arts and Culture: A Guide And Call To Acknowledgement Teen Vogue: Indigenous Land Acknowledgement, Explained "We at Seattle Mennonite church acknowledge that we are on the unceded ancestral Lands of the Duwamish people, A people that are still here, continuing to honor and bring to light their ancient heritage." Exterior wall of Seattle Mennonite Church in North Seattle. This was a project of a senior high school student who worked closely with a Duwamish elder. https://www,realrentduwarnish.org/land-acknowledgement.html Packet Pg. 236 5/21/2019 5/13/2019 2018 HSS Meeting Land Acknowledgement I History of Science Society 4 About HSS Membership Meetings Et Events Careers Et Opportunities Resources Digital HSS Donate Now Meetings Et Events Future and Past Meetings Other Conferences Colloquia DONATE Q JOIN HSS 2019 MEETING VOLUNTEER V TWITTER f FACEBOOK O YOUTUBE 13 POST A JOB OR CONFERENCE An open access discovery service for the history r;i science IsisCS ;-dW—ftMV Explore the IsisCB .72�(Cil NT. e.rn h e v Neves ai-Rd i4exvs fi,cml the, Professie>g Animal Studies Journal 8.1 out now May 13, 2019 The emergence of the neo-colonial in the post- modern, global present; 2oi8 HSS Meeting Land Acknowledgement indigenous communities owned the land on which many institutions of research and education have been built. Academic conferences and events are also routinely held in these spaces. This land is essential to the identity and worldview of Indigenous groups. often these lands were taken under unjust and violent circumstances resulting in forced relocation that continues to have devastating effects on native communities. Indigenous Land Acknowledgements are one small but tangible way institutions of culture and education in the United States can begin repairing the harm caused by mainstream historical accounts, which have excluded Indigenous voices and obscured the centrality of violence to colonialism in the United States. Indigenous Land Acknowledgement refers to the practice of recognizing an Indigenous community's ancestral ties to the land on which a meeting or event is taking place. Acknowledging the communities that have an inseparable connection to the land on which these institutions reside challenges the mainstream narrative and calls attention to the strength of Indigenous communities which have survived the devastating effects of displacement and colonization. Further, this history informs the present experience of Native American peoples, so it is essential to the contextualization of current events. The ad hoc committee on Land Acknowledgement recommended that the History of Science Society implement the practice of Indigenous land acknowledgment for the 2o18 annual meeting in Seattle and for subsequent meetings. We see this as a step toward reparation for the harm caused by centuries of misrepresentation of Indigenous peoples and denial of their right to participate in the telling of their own narratives. These statements represent respect for Indigenous voices, acknowledgement of the violence of US history, and demonstrate that in most cases Indigenous peoples are still here to tell their story. The Seattle -area is home to six Nations: the Duwamish, Muckleshoot, Snohomish, Snoclualmie, Suduamish, and Tulalip peoples. This .1.......... year, Chairwoman Cecile Hansen from the Duwamish nation will open the conference at our Plenary Session. This ceremony is intended to provide an official welcome for all Meeting activities. Should your session or business meeting also wish to include a land acknowledgement, a sample statement can be found below. We strongly encourage conference attendees to learn about each nation's history and current realities through their websites. While the practice of Indigenous land acknowledgement is new to research and educational institutions in the United States, it has long been an established protocol among Indigenous groups around the world. It has even become standard in both Canada and Australia. Acknowledgement guides by Australians Together, the Canadian Association of University .............................................. . Teachers and the U.S. Department of Art and Culture all echo many of the same sentiments. .. ............... ....... A,; Wi i ciuiic;;l ar,d WWIviic cooki. < in to iirovidc the best a poriance ou Our w;ub,:ae. Accept & Close https:llhssonline.org/meetings/annual-meeting-archive/20l 8-hss-annual-meeting/2018-hss-meeting-land-acknowledgment/ Packet Pg. 237 1/5 5/13/2019 2018 HSS Meeting Land Acknowledgement I History of Science Society past and present, as well as living descendants and future 7.2.a Call for Columnists: generations." All three guides also state that it is important Perspectives Daily to be genuine in the acknowledgement, so this basic format April 12, 2oi9 can be altered to include information that it is appropriate to the specific setting. Additionally, all three emphasize the New Books in Science importance of reaching out to the specific Indigenous group Seeking Podcast Hosts or groups being acknowledged to ensure that the statement April ro, 2019 is respectful and accurately represents them in the way that they want to be represented. This is particularly important CFP: Special Issue at because, for far too long, Indigenous peoples have been Foundations of Science denied a say in their own representation. This inclusive on "James Joule's approach is therefore a step toward decolonizing these institutions. Bicentenary: Foundations and Nature Academic institutions and societies are particularly of Science Teaching" • • rrnportant spaces :n which to challenge the mvisi, ilizati,• or, April 6, 2org of Native peoples in the contemporary United States. Historically, the collection of Indigenous artifactual and �,%e ':'.i ire ;, biological material and intangible cultural heritage was •. motivated by the belief that Indigenous cultures would soon - — ........ disappear. Further, these collections were used to judge and hierarchically organize the cultures represented by these �� `�� objects. Scientists, policy -makers, and laypeople used the conclusions drawn from such studies of collections to justify �5 a violence of entire groups of people, including Indigenous communities. Additionally, because these pursuits were considered scientific, the knowledge of I I western trained scientists and collectors was and continues to be privileged over that of the represented peoples. The colonial, visual and global turns in the history of science have started to bring attention to Search j the historical significance of Indigenous knowledge systems. We see land acknowledgment policy as a logical next step in this positive trend towards more inclusive scholarship in the history of science. Academic institutions must focus on the realities and voices of contemporary Indigenous communities, since academic work from a range of disciplines has given the impression that these societies no longer exist. Indigenous land acknowledgement is already an established and common practice among Indigenous individuals and tribal or other Indigenous identity -related institutions. While these statements do make mainstream research and education institutions more welcome to Indigenous audiences, they are not the only audiences who need to hear them. This practice is about more than making space —it is about making the history of marginalized populations part of the mainstream consciousness. Though land acknowledgement is a small step, it is an important one that demonstrates an interest in truth -telling. As legal scholar Chelsea Vowel (Metis) and other Native scholars suggest, land acknowledgement should constitute the first step in a process of opening dialogue with Indigenous communities to learn about the specific laws and protocols of that Nation regarding the responsibilities of guests. A verbal acknowledgment, moreover, must be accompanied by concrete allocation of time and resources to both educate regarding the colonial history of the specific land upon which the meeting or event occurs, and to support the participation of Indigenous people in the society or institution. cLnIca( cwd aswlVli� 11 ol-CL:1 k pFu% the he- 0!1 e Accept & Close https:llhssonline,orglmeetings/annual-meeting-archivel2018-hss-annual-meetingl2018-hss-meeting-land-acknowledgment/ Packet Pg. 238 2/5 5/13/2019 2018 HSS Meeting Land Acknowledgement I History of Science Society 7.2.a history do not convey the gravity of the devastation that colonialism had on Native American peoples. They often deploy language that obscures the United States as the perpetrator of violence. Yet the use of truthful language is a central tenet of decolonizing methodologies. As described by Amy Lonetree (Ho-Cunk), "Scholars writing from the Indigenous paradigm employ more powerful and precise terms to describe what happened, including `genocide' and `atrocity,' and they do not shy away from naming the perpetrators of the violence in our history." It is important to make this statement in a space that is accessible to all visitors —not just those who are already inclined to seek out information related to Indigenous topics. One criticism of land acknowledgment policy has been the perception of its tokenism. Ne intend to correct for this by demanding that the land acknowledgement practice be a starting point that is then backed up by long-term efforts toward social justice. Dylan AT Miner, a Wiisaakodewinini (Metis) artist, activist, and scholar stresses on the fact that Land Acknowledgements "must be preceded by relationships with living Indigenous peoples, communities, and nations. It must then be followed with ongoing commitments to these same communities. Land Acknowledgements are a responsibility." For HSS, we propose that this practice include: (a) a formal invitation to Elders or community leaders from the Indigenous peoples upon whose land the meeting will occur to open the distinguished lecture or plenary session if this fits with their nation's protocols and interests (to be determined through direct consultation); (b) proposed text that panel chairs can consider using for land acknowledgement at the beginning of each session; (c) a guide to Native history of the region, available on the HSS website so that attendees can educate themselves about the history of the land where the meeting is taking place; (d) the commitment of resources or the appropriate fundraising to provide bursaries for Indigenous scholars to present at the conference. Bibliography and Resources • Garcia, Felicia (Santa Ynez band of Chumash). "You're on Indian Land: Making the Case for Indigenous Land Acknowledgement in Mainstream U.S. Museums." MA thesis, NYU, 2o18. • Shekon Neechie. "Bibliography." July 30, 2oi8. Accessed October 10, 2018. A select bibliography of historical works by Indigenous scholars on Indigenous histories in North America/Turtle Island. • Lonetree, Amy. DecolonizinMuseul„S: Re�resentin Native America in Nationaland Tribal Museums. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press, 2012. • McCoy, Kate, Eve Tuck, and Marcia McKenzie. Land Education: Rethinking Pedagogies of Place from Indigenous, Postcolonial, and Decolonizing Perspectives, 2o16. • Murphy, Michelle. "UnsettHRg Care: Troubling'I'r&qSnaridnal Itineraries of Care in Feminist Health Practices." Social Studies of Science 45, no. 5 (October 1, 2015): 717-37. • Murphy, Michelle. "Alterlife and Deeolonial Chemical Relations." Cultural Anthropology 32, no. 4 (November 29, 20>7): 494-503• _._........... • Queensland Government. "Welcome to Country." Last modified May 4, 201'7. Accessed _............................................. February 1, 2o18. • TallBear, Kim. "Standing.Wth.and, p.ea ingaas Faith: A Feminist -Indigenous Approach _. ........ to IngLiiiy." Journal of Research Practice > o, no. 2 (2014): Article N17. • Tasmanian Government. "Acknowledgement and Welcome to Count ." Accessed Felmisry 1. 2n1 R.—..._...._ W_, use ischnical and enaIviie cuok;a;� in order to provide the best eaperi ncc on our websi!e. Accept & Close hftps://hssonl i ne. org/meetings/an nu a I-meeting-archive/20l 8-hss-a n n ual-meeti n g/2018-hss-meeting-I and-acknowl edgme nV Packet Pg. 239 3/5 7.2.a 5/13/2019 2018 HSS Meeting Land Acknowledgement I History of Science Society • Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada. "Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada: Calls to Action." June 2, 2015. Accessed February 5, 2oi8. • Tuck, Eve, and K. Wayne Yang. "Decoo.n..i..z..a.t.i..o.n..i.s no.t...a m.e..t..a...phor," Decolonization:l......... Indigeneity, Education & Society i, no. 1 (2012): 1-40. • Tuhiwai Smith, Linda. Recolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous,Pe2des. _ Dunedin: University of Otago Press, 1999• • University of British Columbia Museum of Anthropology (MOA). "Director's Welcome ............. ,........— ——...__... Message." Accessed February 1, 2oi8. • U.S. Department of Arts and Culture. "Honor Native Land: A Guide and Call to .....................—.,.......................................................................... Acknowledgement." Accessed October 15, 201�. N - Vowel, Chelsea. "Beyond Territorial Acknowledgements." Accessed Mal, �, 2018. Ad Hoc Committee Members: m v • Marissa Petrou (Louisiana State University) • Elaine LaFay (University of Pennsylvania) 7 d L • Felicia Garcia (Santa Ynez Band of Chumash Indians, School for Advanced Research) 0 �. c d • Rosanna Dent (New Jersey Institute of Technology) E d • Khyati Nagar (York University) We are grateful for the generous help of Polly Olsen, Joshua Reid, and Michael Yates. C Please e-mail our committee with thoughts, questions, ideas or if you are interested in joining c v us at hss.land.acknowledgement@gmail.com. Q Indigenous History of the Seattle Area As you explore Seattle, you'll see numerous monuments and civic gestures to the city's Native heritage. While these rightfully implicate tremendous Indigenous influence in the early days of colonization —a recognition that comes on the heel of decades of Native activism —they also co- exist with violent marginalization. Prior to the arrival of settler colonists, the area currently called Seattle was known as Sdzidzilalitch (Little Crossing -Over -Place). Members of Coast Salish nations began witnessing the arrival of whites interested in land and wealth in the mid -nineteenth century. The emergence of Seattle unfolded slowly through a series of encounters and exchanges between settlers and Indigenous people, whose knowledge and labor shaped Seattle from its "village period" through the 1870s. By the late nineteenth century, those same encounters were marked by widespread disease and wrenching transformations to the landscape. During the Progressive Era, a contingent of Indigenous peoples resisted federal attempts at relocation and, despite enduring oppressive socioeconomic policies, some remained in Seattle. Native migrants also came to the city for seasonal employment and contributed to a brimming Indigenous urban community. Many Indigenous residents who remained moved within Seattle's underclass, living in working-class neighborhoods and frequenting social institutions on Skid Road. I Beginning in the postwar decades, organizations such as the American Indian Service League and community leaders like Ella Aquino and Bernie Whitebear led calls for better living \V� c( kios in order to plovi& the best esperence till utir wehi iLe. Accept & Close Packet Pg. 240 https://hssonline.org/meetings/annual-meeting-archive/2018-hss-annual-meeting/2018-hss-meeting-land-acknowledgment/ 4/5 2018 HSS Meeting Land Acknowledgement I History of Science Society 7.2.a example, were a means of regaining Indigenous rights to Seattle's fisheries and waterways. Many of these groups continue to exert authority over Indigenous rights in the city and undermine colonial narratives of Seattle's founding. Across the past century, white residents pushed Indigenous peoples to the hinterlands at the same time as they appropriated native cultures, traditions, and wares as status symbols. But these and other broader civic gestures to Indigenous heritage, manufactured and marketed largely in favor of an imperial narrative of extinction, obscure a longer, entangled history of presence. Further reading: • Duwamish Tribe. "Our History." (accessed October 15, 2018) .......................... • Tulalip Tribes. "History." (accessed October 15, 2018) • Muckleshoot Indian Tribe. "History of the MuckleshvotIndianTribe and Its .. ............. Reservation." • (accessed October 15, 2oi8) • Snohomish Tribe of Indians. "Snohomish Tribe of Indians HistoryTimeline." (accessed October 15, 2018) • Snoqualmie Tribe. "History." (accessed October 15, 2018) .................... • Suquamish Tribe. "History and Culture." (accessed October 15, 2018) ...........1........ • Harmon, Alexandra. Indians in the Making: Ethnic Relations and Indian Identities around Puget Sound. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2000. + Mingle, Matt. Emerald City: An Environmental History of Seattle. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2007. • Reid, Joshua L. The Sea Is My Country: The Maritime World of the Makahs. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2015. • Thrush, Coll. Native Seattle: Histories from the Crossing -Over -Place. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 2007. 44o Geddes Hall I University of Notre Dame I Notre Dame, IN 46556 I te1574.631.1194 I fax 574.631.1533 I+fo ee hssonline.org 'A10 use technictil tint euial,�+u(: co,)' ia., in order to pro��ide the bect ezperiancc our c�ebsue. Accept & Close https:llhssonline.org/meetings/annual-meeting-archive/20l 8-hss-annual-meeting/2018-hss-meeting-land-acknowledgment/ Packet Pg. 241 5/5 5/13/2019 Land Acknowledgement — North Cascades Institute NORTH CASCADES INSTITUTE Connecting people. nature & community since 1986 Land Acknowledgement The human story of the North Cascades begins with the original stewards of these land and watersheds, the Indigenous Nations and their modern descendants. North Cascades Institute acknowledges that our programs take place in the ancestral homelands of Tribes, Bands, and First Nations, including most notably the Upper Skagit Indian Tribe, Sauk-Suiattle Indian Tribe, Swinomish Indian Tribal Community, Samish Indian Nation, Nooksack Tribe, Lummi Nation, Sto:lo Nation, Nlaka'pamux Nation, Colville Confederated Tribes, Syilx/Okanagan Nation. As educators, we have a responsibility to examine our own relationship to the Land we live and teach on and to the local Indigenous communities whose traditions and identities originated in these special places. We acknowledge that the settlement period histories in this place often reflect the detrimental effects of disease, displacement, violence, migration, and loss of tenured land of Indigenous People. We offer this acknowledgement as a first step in honoring their relationship with land we share, and a call towards further learning and action, not in place of the authentic relationships with local Indigenous communities, but rather to assist in giving them voice. G ibal governments, museums and cultural centers of Washington State f W https://ncascades.org/discover/learning-center/land-acknowledgement Packet Pg. 242 1/3 5/13/2019 Land Acknowledgement— North Cascades Institute Sign up for Field Notes Once or twice a month you'll receive our Field Notes eNewsletter with the latest Institute news, natural history information and photography from the North Cascades, job announcements and special discounts. Take a Class with Us! EM Find a class using our Classes and Events Calendar Directions, weather, webcams and more A Visitors Guide to the learning Center Learning Center campus map Learning Center local trails map Learning Center sustainability information G Life at the Learning Center f Life as a grad student or Learning Center staff — personal, fun, weather, on campus hijinks.. READ MORE + Packet Pg. 243 https://ncascades.org/discover/learning-center/land-acknowledgement 5/13/2019 Tribal Lands Statement J Western Washington University Tribal Lands Statement For official university functions, following is a suggested tribal lands acknowledgement, tailored by location, to use in all opening remarks. I would like to begin by acl<nowledging that we gather today on the ancestral homelands of the Coast Salish Peoples, who have lived in the Salish Sea basin, throughout the San Juan Islands and the North Cascades watershed, from time immemorial. Please join me in expressing our deepest respect and gratitude for our indigenous neighbors, the Lummi Nation and Nooksacl( Tribe, for their enduring care and protection of our shared lands and waterways. Bellingham: Lummi Nation and the Nooksacl< Tribe Anacortes: Samish Indian Nation and the Swinomish Indian Tribal Community Everett: Tulalip Tribes, the Snohomish, the Stillaguamish Tribe and the Saul(-Suiattle Tribe a I(itsap Peninsula: Suquamish Tribe and the Port Gamble S'Klallam Tribe Packet Pg. 244 httiDs://www.wwu.edu/tribal-lands-statement 1 /3 7.2.a 5/13/2019 Tribal Lands Statement i Western Washington University Olympic Peninsula: The Hoh Tribe, Jamestown 51<lallam Tribe, Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe, Makah Indian Tribe, Quileute Tribe, Quinault Indian Nation, Port Gamble S'Klallam Tribe and the Skokomish Tribe. Seattle: Duwamish, Suquamish, Nisqually, Snoqualmie and Muckleshoot tribes. 125 YEARS of ACADEMIC EXCELLENCE Campus Safety Resources Together Against Sexual, Violence DiSCIOSLire of Consumer Information Emergency and Weather Information O Regarding Public Expression and Assembly N L O Jobs Pay Bills z Vendors Q WAC Dor:ket Related Links Returning Students- Need to Apply? Our new tag(ine https./Iwww. wwu,ed u/tr-ibal-I ands -statement Packet Pg. 245 8.1 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 06/25/2019 Draft Urban Forest Management Plan Staff Lead: Shane Hope Department: Development Services Preparer: Diane Cunningham Background/History Development of an Urban Forest Management Plan (UFMP) began in 2017. Public process included open houses, website information, press releases, various public meetings and two public hearings. A draft was reviewed by both the Tree Board and Planning Board. Some revisions were made and the City Council reviewed the new draft and requested several other changes. These changes were made and last reviewed by the City Council on August 7, 2018. No vote on adoption was taken. After further discussion, a supplemental process began that included a small informal team of City staff, Tree Board members, a Planning Board member, and one or two active citizens. The process resulted in another round of edits which were then incorporated by the consultant into a new revised draft UFMP. At the June 11 meeting of the City Council's Planning, Public Safety, and Personnel Committee, the Council members discussed and approved moving adoption of the revised UFMP forward for consideration by the full City Council. Staff Recommendation Adopt the Urban Forest Management Plan, as presented Narrative A new revised draft UFMP (attached) is ready for Council review. It includes changes that reflect key comments, for example: More attention to native trees of our area Re -write of the "Diseases and Pests" section Removal of a map and references to specific tree planting opportunity areas (but still encouraging tree planting) Modification of statements that are not backed by scientific findings for our region More background discussion of tree issues Additional information about city regulations for development Additional information on selecting trees ("right tree, right place") Additional information on trimming trees Caveat about the applicability of the survey that had been done early in the UFMP process Removal of references to specific dollar amounts represented by tree functions (but still recognizing the value of trees in many ways) The revised draft UFMP keeps the same five key goals and the actions recommended to achieve Packet Pg. 246 8.1 them. (The goals and actions are identified in a section called "How Do We Get There?") Adoption of the revised UFMP will help the City move forward to implement the document's recommendations. Attachments: EdmondsWA UFMP 2019_06_3 (1) Packet Pg. 247 � _ L Y � i i � i ■.1.+� n a � u� � �.. .rv� v"��Z� �� r r��e• -f � i r � ��� .. � � � 4 r��� ��.'� � ice`. `} *• � ^'�j` -`-NM1•10010101* � Urban Forest Management Plan May, 2019 8.1.a Packet Pg. 249 8.1.a City of Edmonds Urban Forest Management Plan May, 2019 , P C. I s �) "I DAVEYI-. Resource Group Prepared for: City of Edmonds 121 5th Ave N Edmonds, WA 98020 Prepared by: Davey Resource Group, Inc. 6005 Capistrano Avenue, Suite A Atascadero, California 93422 Phone: 805-461-7500 Toll Free: 800-966-2021 Fax: 805-461-8501 www.davey.com/drg Packet Pg. 250 8.1.a Acknowledgments CITY OF EDMONDS STAFF MEMBERS Shane Hope, Director, Development Services Carrie Hite, Director, Parks, Recreation, and Cultural Services Phil Williams, Director, Public Works and Utilities Brad Shipley, Associate Planner Diane Cunningham, Administrative Assistant Terri Arnold, Deputy Director, Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services Department Rich Lindsay, Parks Maintenance Manager, Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services Department Debra Dill, Parks Senior Laborer, Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services Department Jennifer Leach, Environmental Education & Sustainability Coordinator, Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services Department Kernen Lien, Environmental Programs Manager, Development Services Department Jeanie McConnell, Engineering Program Manager, Public Works Department CITY OF EDMONDS CITIZENS' TREE BOARD Doug Petersen, Position 3 - Chair Frank Caruso, Position 1 - Vice Chair Gail Lovell, Position 2 William Phipps, Position 4 Barbara Chase, Position 5 Steve Hatzenbeler, Position 6 Vivian Olson, Position 7 Suzanne Jeugensen, Alt. CITY OF EDMONDS PLANNING BOARD Nathan Monroe, Position 4 - Chair Matt Cheung, Position 3 - Vice Chair Philip (Phil) Lovell, Position 1 Daniel Robles, Position 2 Carreen Nordling Rubenkonig, Position 5 Alicia Crank, Position 6 Todd Cloutier, Position 7 Mike Rosen, Alt. CITY OF EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL Mike Nelson, Position 2 — Council President Diane Buckshnis, Position 4 — Council President Pro Tem Kristiana Johnson, Position 1 Adrienne Fraley-Monillas, Position 3 Dave Teitzel, Position 5 Thomas Mesaros, Position 6 Neil Tibbott, Position 7 Cli E D 41 0 DAV FF Resource Group Packet Pg. 251 8.1.a Table of Contents Executive Summary Scope & Purpose Plan Foundation Introduction Community Benefits and Challenges of the Urban Forest What Do We Have? r Edmonds' Urban Forestry History Regulatory Framework Regional Plans and Legislation Regional Urban Forestry Resources Urban Tree Canopy Analysis Urban Forestry Practices - Case Studies Existing Urban Forest Practices What Do We Want? Stakeholder and Community Input How Do We Get There? Goals and Actions of the Plan How Are We Doing? Monitoring and Measuring Results Appendices Appendix A: References Appendix B: Table of Figures Appendix C: Community Survey Responses Appendix D: Open House Summary Report Packet Pg. 252 8.1.a Executive Summary Background & Purpose Urban forest simply means the trees in an urban area. An urban forest management plan is a long- term plan for managing trees in a city. The purpose of the City of Edmonds Urban Forest Management Plan is to provide guidance for managing, enhancing, and growing trees in the City of Edmonds over the next 20 years. Special emphasis is placed on managing trees on public property and along the public rights -of -way. Public Involvement ;n Process Public involvement has been part of developing and finalizing the Urban Forest Management Plan. The involvement has included open houses, website postings, informal survey, press releases, and submitted public comments, as well as formal public meetings by the Tree Board, Planning Board, and City Council. Plan Overview and Conclusion Edmonds, like many cities in the Pacific Northwest, once had large stands of old -growth trees that included Douglas fir and Western red cedar. Most of these were logged off years ago and development of streets, homes, businesses, schools, churches, and additional settlement followed. In some places, new trees have grown up or been planted. For Edmonds today, tree canopy coverage is estimated to be about 30.3% of the total city area. Trees have many benefits, but also some challenges. Selecting the right tree for a particular location makes a difference in how the tree will perform and thrive. Appropriate planting methods and tree care are important too. The Cty has a program of planting and caring for trees in public places —such as City parks and along various streets. In addition, the City has regulations about certain aspects of trees on private property. Notably, Edmonds is certified as a "Tree City USA" city and supports an active Citizens Tree Board. The Tree Board, as well as City staff, helps provide public education and participation in volunteer events to plant trees. Throughout the community, many residents also value and take care of trees on their property. To promote future sustainability and urban forest health, thoughtful planning and actions are needed. The Plan identifies five long-range goals to help the City move forward. The goals are: 1. Maintain or enhance citywide canopy coverage 2. Manage public trees proactively 3. Incentivize protecting and planting trees on private property 4. Provide resources to the community to educate/inform on tree planting and care 5. Promote "right tree, right place". Specific action strategies are identified to address each of the Plan's long-range goals. These would be implemented over time, as resources are available, to address priority needs. Furthermore, the Urban Forest Management Plan should be reviewed every five to ten years and updated as needed. 1 Scope & Purpose Packet Pg. 253 8.1.a Overview The plan includes long-range goals and action strategies to promote sustainability, species diversity, and greater canopy cover. Publicly -managed trees along streets, in parks, and at City facilities are collectively referred to as the community urban forest. Privately owned trees are also considered part of the urban forest in this plan because of their function and contribution to the sustainability of the overall urban forest in Edmonds; however, the City recognizes that it has a limited role in the care of private trees. Recognizing the significance of environmental and socioeconomic benefits provided by trees and their relationship with a high quality of life, the UFMP aims to: • Illustrate the value and benefits of trees. • Promote shared vision and collaboration between community residents. • Establish benchmarks and metrics to monitor the long-term success of management strategies. • Enhance the health and sustainability of the community urban forest. • Increase the vital benefits that the trees provide to Edmonds and the region. • Ensure that resources are in place to support the care and management of the community's trees. This UFMP includes goals and action strategies for the long-term and short-term in support of this purpose. It identifies appropriate resources to adequately manage community trees. It is intended to remain flexible and dynamic, allowing for the exploration and implementation of the actions as funding and resources permit. The development of the UFMP included a comprehensive review of existing policies and regulations, currentfunding and maintenance levels, analysis of the extent, condition, and composition of the existing tree resources, stakeholder concerns, and community input. Plan Foundation Spending any amount of time outdoors in Edmonds will reveal the abundant and diverse natural resources found within City parks and surrounding residences and businesses. Besides the obvious amenities available to a city on the coastline of the Puget Sound, another abundant natural wonder in Edmonds is its trees. Interspersed amongst the buildings and roads, trees provide the City with the shade, fresh air, and softened landscape that help people achieve the unique experience referred to as; "an Edmonds kind of day." All of the trees in Edmonds make up the City's urban forest tree resource. Without active management, this urban forest is at risk. What What Do We Do We Have? Want? How How Do I Are We -ql% We Get Doing? There? c a. c a� E M �a c M U) W 0 U_ c M D w L 0 M i 0 o� i 0 N a. U) 0 E w c m E M U 0 r a Scope & Purpose 2 Packet Pg. 254 8.1.a In December 2016, the City adopted a Comprehensive Plan that formally recognized that the community places a high value on the conservation of the urban forest. This Urban Forest Management Plan (UFMP) is intended to be an element that aligns in support of the Comprehensive Plan. In particular, this UFMP aligns with the intentions of, "providing a framework for moving the Edmonds community toward a sustainable future that integrates and responds to environmental, economic, and social needs in a way which meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs" (Comp Plan, 2016). Thefollowingprinciples for urbanforest management set the framework for the UFMP: • Optimize the ecosystem services provided by trees. • Control tree maintenance costs to the community. • Create pathways to stable and predictable funding. • Mitigate risks and liabilities associated with trees. The structure and organization of the UFMP are based on the understanding of what we have, what we want, how we get there, and how we are doing. This structure, referred to as adaptive management, is commonly used for resource planning and management (Miller, R.W., 1988) and provides a good conceptual framework for managing community forest resources. The plan development process involved a comprehensive review and assessment of the existing community tree resource, including composition, value, and environmental benefits. The process explored community values, existing regulations, and policies related to community trees. In addition, there were multiple stakeholders, internal and external, who played a role in the planning, design, care, and advocacy around the community forest. These stakeholders include the general public, City departments, the Citizens' Tree Board, and Snohomish Public Utility District (PUD). Each of these stakeholders contributed to the development of this Plan. What Do We Have? Edmonds was founded along the coast of the Puget Sound in 1890. Similar to the rest of the region, Edmonds had forestlands that were logged and waters that were fished. As Edmonds has grown in population, the forest has been urbanized and divided for parks, homes, and businesses. Recognizing the role of trees in the community and the necessity to manage them, the City drafted a Streetscape Plan in 2002 that included tree planting guidelines as part of the general aesthetic goals for the community. Revised in 2006 and again in 2015, elements of this Plan introduced tree care policy that has since been the source for many of the City's tree management decisions. In terms of regulations, the care for the urban forest is generally understood to be required by the Growth Table 1: Benchmark Values (2017) The City Acres 6,095 Population 41,841) Land lower Tree Canopy 30% brass & Vegetation 27% 1 m peruio us Su rfaces 34% Bare Soils 2% Open Water 7% Tree Canopy Corer Maximum Potential Canopy 57% Invesborlit _ Tree i re Per Capita $ 7.74 .3 scope & Purpose Packet Pg. 255 8.1.a Management Act of 1990. Guidance is provided by the City's Comprehensive Plan (2016), the Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan (2016), and the Streetscape Plan (2015). These primary documents define the reach of existing regulations and policies within which care for the urban forest is mandated: • Comprehensive Plan (2016) - Environmental Quality Goal A - "...Protect environmental quality within the Edmonds community through the enforcement of community -based environmental regulations." • Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan (2016) - Natural Resource and Habitat Conservation Goal 4 — "Preserve and provide access to natural resource lands for habitat conservation, recreation, and environmental education." • Objective 4.5 - Expand the urban forest and increase tree canopy in Edmonds. • Action Plan 4.G - Steward the urban forest using appropriate maintenance of street and park trees, clear removal and replacement policies and providing information about urban forestry to property owners. • Streestcape Plan (Revised 2015) - Celebrate Sustainable Practices. In redesigning the corridor, it is critical that the new interventions improve the street's performance. This includes enhancing the street environment and gateways for pedestrian benefits through an Urban Forestry program in the Downtown/Waterfront area. The urban forest is a combination of both public and private trees. Any trees that the City has direct control of and responsibility for are defined as the community tree resource. This includes public trees in parks, along rights -of -way, and around City facilities. Managing any resource begins with defining what is being managed and establishing benchmarks along with clearly defined goals and expectations. While public trees along major arterials and high - profile areas are well-known and routinely cared for by City staff, other public street trees are expected to be maintained by the adjacent property owner. Aside from individual development applications, the City does not have a method to take an inventory or track the history, status, or location of public trees. In addition, providing adequate care for trees requires a level of knowledge and a skill set that many property owners do not have. The planning process for this UFMP included an assessment of tree canopy. The results of the study provide a clear picture of the extent and distribution of tree canopy across Edmonds, benchmarking the average tree canopy cover at 30.3%. Analysis of historical change estimates that the City has lost 114 acres of its tree canopy since 2005. In 2005, there was an average tree canopy cover of 32.3%. The primary challenges and opportunities for urban forest management are: • Private owners control the majority of tree canopy (83.0%) with few regulations to limit tree removal, except when the trees are associated with development or are within an environmentally critical area. • There is limited knowledge about the condition of trees in the urban forest. • There is an estimated 1,651 acres is theoretically available for planting to expand the urban forest canopy'. The views of scenic places are fundamental to Edmonds' identity as a community and require balanced consideration with the care of the urban forest. Scenic views are highly valued in long- established development. At the same time, appreciation of trees —especially "the right trees in the right place" —is a value shared by most residents. 1 This estimate is partly based on an analysis of low-lying vegetation areas. c (L c a� E a� �a c M U) 4) 0 LL c M w 0 M i 0 i o� 0 N (L 2 LL Q U) c 0 E w c as E U 0 r a Executive Summary 4 Packet Pg. 256 Land Cover 8.1.a V Bare Soils 2% Grass/Vegetati( 27% Figure 1: Land Cover -anopy npervious 34% � I 2 1,: N RT City ijmits T Tree canopy R �2anl Grass/Low-Lying Vegetation sr ISTHsr Impervious Surfaces # Bare Soil open Water Y N r � $T 0 025 0.5 1 Miles Figure 1: Land Cover Jr Executive Summary c a c a� E w ca c M U) w L O U- r- M D W L r• M �I 0 CD N a 2 LL 'Q N C O w c m M U M r Q Packet Pg. 257 8.1.a 17 What Do We Want? The plan development process included substantial outreach to public stakeholders, residents, and non-profit agencies. The process provided a broad perspective of the challenges that face Edmonds' urban forest. Through open house forums and public meetings, the City has found an engaged set of residents with varying opinions on matters pertaining to the care of the urban forest. City Staff were also consulted during plan development, with City code and public safety being the main considerations when making tree care decisions. City Staff will often take a reactive approach to tree management by performing work on trees as problems are discovered, but they also look for opportunities to plant trees in strategic public places. Open house forums and public meetings provided perspective on community interests and concerns about the urban forest. In general, stakeholders from both the community and City Staff share the following desired outcomes for the UFMP: • Preservation and Enhancement of Tree Canopy • Sustainability, Health, and Safety of the Community Tree Resource • Preservation and Enrichment of Wildlife and Habitat • Increased Outreach and Education • Increased Collaboration with Volunteers and Non-profit Groups • Strategies and Policies to Minimize Potential Tree Conflicts Executive summary 6 Packet Pg. 258 8.1.a How Do We GF There? The long-range strategic goals provided in this Plan are proposed to address the three components of a sustainable urban forestry program through specific actions: • Urban Forest Asset Actions - which are intended to improve the urban forest resource over the next 20 years by developing detailed expectations for the urban forest. • Municipal Resource Actions - which are intended to drive improvements in City policy and practices by developing efficiency and alignment of efforts within City departments. • Community Resource Actions - which are intended to build stronger community engagement and public participation in urban forest stewardship. Goal 1- Maintain citywide canopy coverage How Are We Doing? The UFMP presents opportunities to care for the urban forest in Edmonds by providing an overarching framework for urban forestry operations, policies, and programs. It presents a high-level review of urban forest management in the City, including historical context and an exploration of the benefits of Edmonds' trees. Building upon that information, the Plan connects the community's vision for the urban forest with appropriate goals and actions. This Plan provides various goals to pursue along a 20-year timeline concluding in 2038. These short and long-term goals will be achieved by adapting the Plan according to a five-year cyclical review of operational objectives. The success of the UFMP will be measured through the realization of goals and will be demonstrated through the health of the urban forest and increased environmental benefits. Ultimately, it will lead to an enhancement of tree canopy throughout the City. Furthermore, the greatest measurement of success for the UFMP will be how successful it is in meeting community expectations for the care and preservation of the community tree resource. Goal 2 - Manage public trees pro -actively Goal 3 - Incentivize protecting & planting trees on private prope Goal 4 - Provide resources to the community to educate/inform on tree planting and care Youth volunteers helping with tree resource management. 7 Executive Summary Packet Pg. 259 8.1.a Introduction Trees play an essential role in the community of Edmonds, providing numerous tangible and intangible benefits to residents, visitors, neighboring communities, businesses, and wildlife. Research demonstrates that healthy urban trees can improve the local environment and lessen the impact resulting from urbanization and industry (U.S. Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Division, 2017). Trees can improve air quality, reduce energy consumption, help manage stormwater, reduce erosion, provide critical habitat for wildlife, and promote a connection with nature. In addition to these direct improvements, healthy urban trees increase the overall attractiveness of a community. In Portland, Oregon, street trees were found to add an average of $8,870 to homes' sales price as well as reduce time on the market for home sales by 1.7 days (Donovan et al., 2010). Studies on the business benefits of trees have shown how retail districts promote longer and more frequent shopping and greater sales (Wolf, 2007). Urban trees support a more livable community, fostering psychological health and providing residents with a greatersense of place (Kuo, 2003). Communitytrees, both public and private, soften the urban hardscape by providing a green sanctuary and making the City of Edmonds a more enjoyable place to live, work, and play. The City has emphasized the importance of trees within the Comprehensive Plan (2016), so much so that public trees are defined as a valued community resource, a critical component of the urban infrastructure, and a part of the City's identity. Edmonds' trees are a valued community resource Community Early settlements were built in the City to access natural resources, where shingle mills became the primary industry. Although construction of the Great Northern Railway along the waterfront was expected to be the main source of growth in the City, most growth occurred due to its proximity to Seattle. Passenger ferry service has also helped the town grow and prosper. Edmonds' population, from 2017 State estimates, is 41,260 people and covers a land area of 8.9 square miles. It is the third largest city in the county after Everett and Marysville. By 2035, the population is expected to be 45,550. The urban forest in this community is defined by its public and privately managed trees. Through parks and public rights -of -way, the City maintains a diverse population of trees intended for city streetscapes (typically nursery grown hardwoods), as well as native trees (naturally regenerating conifers and deciduous trees). Privately managed trees may be remnant forest trees connected with early logging history, naturally growing native trees and even invasive hardwoods. Community Vision for the UFMP Edmonds' Comprehensive Plan provides a vision of the City as an attractive, sustainable community for all ages. It specifically recognizes the value of trees as contributing to that vision and directs that an urban forest management plan be used as a guide for decisions on managing the forest resource, especially focusing on public land and rights -of -way. For private lands, the UFMP would guide education and incentives to encourage good tree management practices. c a c as E a� a� �a c M U) 4) 0 U- c M L D w 0 MI 0 I o� 0 N a 2 U- U) c 0 E w c as U 0 r a Introduction 8 Packet Pg. 260 8.1.a Benefits and Challenges of the Urban Forest Urban and natural forests work constantly to mitigate the effects of urbanization and development, which protects and enhances lives within the community. In general, there are five (5) important ways in which trees provide benefits: Water Quality, Carbon Sequestration, Energy Savings, Air Quality, and Socioeconomic benefits. Water Quality Urban stormwater runoff is a major source of contamination for the Puget Sound and riparian areas throughout Edmonds, threatening both human health and wildlife, including salmon populations. Requirements for surface water management are becoming more stringent and costly for both developers and the City. By incorporating the right mix of urban trees into stormwater management planning, runoff volumes, peak stream flows and flooding incidents may all be reduced; a strategy that may lessen the need for constructing stormwater management facilities and the cost of treatment to remove sediment and other pollutants. Typical overview of waterfront homes in Edmonds. 9 Introduction Trees improve and protect water quality by: • Intercepting Rainfall —Trees intercept rainfall in their canopy, which act as a mini -reservoir. Some water evaporates from the canopy and some slowly soaks into the ground, reducing the total amount of runoff (Xiao, et al., 2000). Canopy interception also lessens soil compaction, which in turn further reduces runoff. • Increasing soil capacity and infiltration — Root growth and decomposition increase the capacity and rate of soil infiltration by rainfall and snowmelt resulting in slower percolation rates and increasing the filtration of contaminants (Xiao, et al., 2007). • Reducing soil erosion — Tree roots reduce the flow and volume of stormwater runoff, avoiding erosion and preventing sediments and other pollutants from entering streams, rivers, Lake Washington, and the Puget Sound (WA Department of Ecology, 2011). • Providing salmon habitat — Shade from trees helps to cool warm urban runoff, which poses a threat to anadromous fish, like salmon. Shade from trees provides lakeside and riparian habitat for salmon and cools water temperatures, increasing dissolved oxygen, which is essential to salmon survival (Puget Sound Partnership, 2012). Packet Pg. 261 8.1.a Carbon Sequestration As environmental awareness continues to increase, governments are paying particular attention to global warming and the effects of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. As energy from the sun (sunlight) strikes the Earth's surface it is reflected back into space as infrared radiation (heat). Greenhouse gases absorb some of this infrared radiation and trap this heat in the atmosphere, increasing the temperature of the Earth's surface. Many chemical compounds in the Earth's atmosphere act as GHGs, including methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), carbon dioxide (CO), water vapor, and human -made gases/aerosols. As GHGs increase, the amount of energy radiated back into space is reduced, and more heat is trapped in the atmosphere. An increase in the average temperature of the earth is resulting in changes in weather, sea levels, and land -use patterns, commonly referred to as "climate change." In the last 150 years, since large-scale industrialization began, the levels of some GHGs, including CO2, have increased by 25% (U.S. Energy Information Administration). Trees absorb atmospheric carbon, which reduces greenhouse gases. The carbon -related function of trees is measured in two ways: storage (total stored in tree biomass) and sequestration (the absorption rate per year) (Jo, et al., 1995). Urban trees reduce atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) in two ways: • Directly —Through growth and the sequestration of CO2 as wood and foliar biomass. • Indirectly — By lowering the demand for air conditioning, thereby reducing the emissions associated with electric power generation and natural gas consumption. Stormwater runoff from streets needs to be controlled. Trees will slow and intercept stormwater, reducing the burden on stormwater infrastructure. Energy Savings Electric and gas utilities develop energy conservation solutions to keep rates low for their customers, reduce their need to build new lines, and, ultimately, to be good environmental stewards. Energy services delivered to Edmonds residents are provided by Snohomish County Public Utility District (SNOPUD). This organization recognizes how trees can reduce energy consumption and encourages Edmonds residents to consider trees as a cooperative strategy for improving energy conservation (SNOPUD, 2017). Urban trees and forests modify the environment and conserve energy in three principal ways: • Shade dwellings and impervious surfaces — Impervious surfaces in 2011 were assessed as 34% of the total land base (Edmonds, 2017). Shade from trees reduces the amount of radiant energy absorbed and stored by these impervious surfaces, thereby reducing the urban heat island effect, a term that describes the increase in urban temperatures in relation to surrounding locations (Simpson & McPherson, 2000). Shade from trees also reduces the amount of energy used to cool a structure (Simpson, 2002). • Transpiration —Transpiration releases water vapor from tree canopies, which cools the surrounding area. Through shade and transpiration, trees and vegetation within an urban setting modify the environment and reduce heat island effects. Temperature differences of more than 97 (5°C) have been observed between city centers without canopy cover and more forested suburban areas (Akbari, et al., 1997). • Wind reduction — Trees can reduce wind speeds by up to 50% and influence the movement of air and pollutants along streets and out of urban canyons. By reducing air movement into buildings and against conductive surfaces (e.g., glass, metal siding), trees can reduce conductive heat loss. c a c a� E a� a� �a c M U) 0 U_ c M D w 0 M I 0 o� I 0 N a 2 U_ Q c 0 E w c m E z U 0 r a Introduction 10 Packet Pg. 262 8.1.a Air Quality Urban trees improve air quality in five fundamental ways: • Reducing particulate matter (e.g., dust and smoke) • Absorbing gaseous pollutants • Shade and transpiration • Reducing power plant emissions • Increasing oxygen levels They protect and improve air quality by intercepting particulate matter (PM10), including dust, ash, pollen, and smoke. The particulates are filtered and held in the tree canopy where they are eventually washed harmlessly to the ground. Trees and forests absorb harmful gaseous pollutants like ozone (0), nitrogen dioxide (NO), and sulfur dioxide (SO). Shade and transpiration reduces the formation of 03, which is created during higher temperatures. Scientists are now finding that some trees may absorb more volatile organic compounds (VOC's) than previously thought (Karl, T. et al 2010; Science NOW, 2010). VOC's are a class of carbon -based particles emitted from automobile exhaust, lawnmowers, and other human activities. By reducing energy needs, trees also reduce emissions from the generation of power. And, through photosynthesis, trees and forests increase oxygen levels. The needles of these douglas fir trees help improve air quality. Aesthetic, Habitat, Socioeconomic, and Health Benefits While perhaps the most difficult to quantify, the aesthetic and socioeconomic benefits from trees may be among their greatest contributions, including: • Beautification, comfort, and aesthetics • Shade and privacy • Wildlife habitat • Opportunities for recreation • Reduction in violent crime • Creation of a sense of place and history • Reduced illness and reliance on medication and quicker recovery from injury or illness Some of these benefits are captured as a percentage of property values, through higher sales prices where individual trees and forests are located. In addition, trees and forests have positive economic benefits for retailers. There is evidence that trees promote better business by stimulating more frequent and extended shopping and a willingness to pay more for goods and parking (Wolf, 2007). Trees and forestlands provide important habitat (foraging, nesting, spawning, etc.) for mammals, birds, and fish and other aquatic species, along with limitless opportunities for recreation, offering a healthful respite from the pressures of work and everyday stress. 11 Introduction Packet Pg. 263 8.1.a Tree Selection related to Location and Other Factors Selecting tree species that are appropriate for the expected functions, maintenance requirements, and locations in which they are planted is important. Generally, native trees should be considered for planting or replacement whenever practical. Along City streets, relatively compact trees that add color and interest, without tending to upheave pavement, are typically desirable. An example is the Bowhall maple, which has been used in numerous street -side locations in Edmonds. When street trees are planted on the same side of the street as SnoPUD overhead power lines, additional caution is needed in selecting appropriate species. These poles also usually carry major communication lines. Such facilities are often located at the very edge of the City's rights -of -way or in planter strips between the sidewalk and the curb. Trees should be selected that do not result in the need for frequent topping or heavy pruning to keep them underneath the communication space on PUD poles, which can be as low as 15 feet above ground level. In large spaces, native coniferous trees may be very appropriate. Some of these species (such as Douglas fir) can grow very tall (up to 200 feet) and wide (30 feet). They are well -suited to the Pacific Northwest climate and have needles year-round. Also, various types of deciduous trees, including maple and oak, may be appropriate in large spaces. In view areas and in many relatively small spaces, lower -growing or less -spreading trees may be a good choice. For example, vine maples have colorful leaves in autumn and at mature height are generally no more than 15 feet tall. However, the branches of this species can spread wide, up to 20 feet. Other species, even fruit trees and small specimen trees, may fit well in settings where tree height or width needs to be limited. In critical areas where wildlife habitat exists, native trees should generally be chosen for planting. Depending on the type of habitat and space availability, such trees could include Western red cedar, Douglas fir, alder, and dogwood. A mix of large and small trees in a park. Introduction 12 Packet Pg. 264 Right tree, right place 8.1.a Factors to consider when selecting a tree to plant. Planting a tree is something that provide a sense of accomplishment and something to admire for decades. However, it is not a decision that should be made without careful consideration. When considering what tree to plant and where to plant it, one should remember the widely used phrase "Right Tree, Right Place." Choosing the right tree depends on many factors including soil type, climate, and the amount of space the tree will have both underground and overhead. It is important to choose a tree that does not require more space in the future than a site can provide. To avoid any conflicts with overhead obstructions (e.g., power lines, utility poles, buildings) or underground obstructions (e.g., pipes, building foundations), consider the tree's height, root growth, and shape at maturity. While above -ground growth is a little easier to envision, a tree needs plenty of room to grow underground too; tree roots can extend up to two to three times the width of the crown (the leaves and branches of the tree). Apart from the physical space available for a tree to grow, one may consider whether the property is in a view shed and how the tree at maturity will impact the views. Trees in streetscapes can grow into conflict with sidewalks. 1. The tree's purpose will impact the suitability of different tree species, whether used for shade, aesthetic beauty, wind protection, screening, or other purposes. 2. Size and location of the tree, including available space for roots and branches, affects the decision on which species to plant. 3. Crown form or shape varies among species, including round, oval, columnar, V-shaped, or pyramidal shapes. Consider how the shape of the tree works in the space available. Note on Native Trees: Edmonds was once covered in forests of old growth Douglas fir, western red cedar, and western hemlock. While these trees were once the right tree in the right place, they often may not be appropriate for urban environments. In natural conditions, a Douglas fir can grow to more than 200 feet in height with a diameter of five to eight feet. While the City's parks and the larger zoned properties (12,000 — 20,000 square foot minimum lot size) primarily located in north Edmonds may provide sufficient growing space for these large native species, they may not be appropriate landscape trees within the Edmonds "bowl area" with its more dense development and view concerns. � 0. Tree roots lifting a sidewalk. 13 Introduction Packet Pg. 265 8.1.a Trees and Views To some people, trees are the view and to others, trees block the view. The City of Edmonds is blessed with magnificent views of Puget Sound and the Olympic Mountain range. These views add to the quality of life here, as well as to property values. When views become obstructed, enjoyment of one's property as well as property values may be impacted. The City's Comprehensive Plan has many policies recognizing the protection of public views (views from parks or view corridors down streets and at street ends), but does not specifically address private view protection. Not all areas of Edmonds have views of Puget Sound and the Olympics. While a view shed study of the City of Edmonds has not been completed, the primary view areas are located in the Bowl and the properties on the west facing slopes of north Edmonds. When considering planting trees in these view areas, lower growing trees will help preserve the views of neighboring properties. Topping of trees for views is often the first consideration of landowners. However, topping is not generally recognized as good arboricultural practice. A topped tree requires periodic maintenance to maintain its reduced size. That can become expensive in the long-term. Also, conifers will often form a An example of skirting -up; the lower limbs on this tree have been removed to provide drivers with a clearer view. weakened top as the side branches all try to grow up. In addition, the cut top often becomes an entry site for decay organisms that weaken the tree and increase the danger of a top breaking in high winds. For broad-leaved trees such as maple, madrone or oaks, severe topping is even more damaging. It can seriously harm the tree's health and cause various safety hazards. While views are important, otherfactors such as critical areas must also betaken into consideration. The north Edmonds view shed is associated with significant slopes (potential landslide hazards are slopes 40% and greater) as well as a historic landslide area that has specific regulations that apply to development in that area (Chapter 19.10 ECDC — Earth Subsidence and Landslide Hazard Areas) in addition to critical area regulations. The mechanical and hydrogeological benefits which trees and other vegetation provide to maintain slope stability and reduce erosion are well documented. Tree maintenance activities that maintain the health of existing trees will also help maintain slope stability. A landowner should explore alternative options to tree removal or topping. Below is a list of several trimming practices derived from Vegetation Management: A Guidefor PugetSound Bluff Property Owners (Ecology Public 93-31) which can be used in combination to create views without compromising tree health or slope stability. View -enhancing Pruning Alternatives for Conifers 1. Windowing 2. Interlimbing 3. Skirting -up • Note: In any pruning practice or combination, 60% or more of the original crown should be retained to maintain tree health and vigor. The removal of too much live foliage can reduce the tree's ability to supply food to the roots, thereby weakening them. Windowing. This pruning practice allows a view "window" through the existing foliage of the tree's canopy. In pruning major limbs and c a. c a� aEi ca c M U) 0 U_ c M D w 0 M 0 o� i 0 N a. 2 U_ Q U) c 0 E w c as E U 0 r a Introduction 14 Packet Pg. 266 8.1.a branch whorls, sections that obscure a view are removed. Many people find that this technique creates an aesthetically pleasing effect. • Interlimbing. The removal of entire branch whorls or individual branches throughout the canopy allows more light to pass through, as well as reducing wind resistance of the tree. This practice can be used in conjunction with windowing to improve views. • Skirting -up. Limbing the tree up from the bottom allows a clear line of sight. Instead of an obscuring mass of foliage, the tree trunk is the only object between you and the view. This technique is useful when the tree in question is located high on the bluff face or upon the tableland. Relatively more branches can be removed with this technique because the lower branches contribute less nutrients to the tree than higher branches. Pruning Broad-leaved Trees Pruning and trimming of broad-leaved trees is usually more complicated, especially for trees grown in the wild. Generally, short-lived species such as alder, willow and Bitter cherry are not worth pruning, while trees like madrona, white oak, bigleaf maple, and vine maple will warrant the expense. Crown reduction is one of the most common methods that arborists use to control the size of the tree and keep its shape perfect. This method involves reducing the foliage of the tree while still preserving the general structure of the crown; doing this successfully trims the overall shape of the tree and controls its size. In a general sense, limbs that are located on the uppermost portion of the tree canopy are cut shorter in order to decrease the tree's height. However, they are only removed to the next lateral growth to be able to ensure that they heal faster and grow again properly. It is highly recommended that only 20% or less of the tree's canopy should be cut at once in order to avoid the tree from suffering. Properties owners should consult a certified arborist prior to undertaking any tree maintenance activity. Challenges Developing and caring for a healthy urban forest requires the coordination of many different stakeholders, with a clear vision, and dedicated resources. As such, the urban forest intersects with many other elements of the city. This can result in conflict or challenges including: • Conflicts with Buildings and Infrastructure - Roots and branches of trees can damage nearby sidewalks, utility lines, and buildings. • Hazard Trees - Trees can create hazards to the community. Storm events, accidents, improper maintenance, and the natural death of trees can all create structural weaknesses for trees and the surrounding area. • View Issues - Edmonds is known for the majestic views of the Puget Sound. It is possible for trees to block these views if they grow too large or were planted in improper locations. • Maintenance - Trees are living infrastructure. As such, they require active and regular maintenance. Structural pruning, irrigation, and the management of pests and diseases are some critical maintenance practices that must occur to ensure a healthy and vibrant urban forest. • Choice of Tree Species - Different tree species have different needs, growth patterns, and resistances to pests and diseases. A diverse palette of species improves the resilience of the urban forest. A tree with multiple stems may become a hazard without 15 Introduction proper care. Packet Pg. 267 8.1.a What Do We Have?. To effectively manage the urban forest, it's essential to have knowledge and understanding of what exists today. This section lays the groundwork for the UFMP with historical context, current policies and practices and understanding about the existing state of the urban forest. History of Urban Forestry in Edmonds Trees have been an important part of the City's character and economy since its founding. However, to understand and manage the urban forest has depended upon which trees are being considered and where the trees were located. This is evident from the various locations where trees are referenced in the City code as well as the variety of departments whose staff oversee tree related matters. Edmonds had been designated by the National Arbor Day Foundation as a Tree City USA since 2011, but has had city staff in different departments managing tree issues within the City for decades. Recognizing the role of trees in the community and the necessity to manage them, the City drafted a Streetscape plan in 2002 that included tree planting guidelines as part of the general aesthetic goals of the community. Revised again in 2006 and 2015, elements of this plan introduced tree care policy which has been the source for much of the City's tree management decisions ever since. In 2010, the City formed the Edmonds Citizens' Tree Board to assist in the development of tree ordinances and to encourage the planting and maintaining of trees. This is an early example of the City taking steps towards management of tree resources as an integrated ecosystem of both public and private trees. In 2015, one of the efforts of this board was a proposal to the City for updated tree - related municipal ordinances. These proposed tree codes, through a public comment period, were rejected in part due to public concerns about private property rights, but also because the City felt that it had insufficient tree policy direction to warrant the recommended codes. From these related events, it's clear that the community has assumed an increasing level of care for the urban forest that would benefit from long- term strategic planning. Increasing regulations from the State and Federal Government for environmental stewardship requirements have also played a significant role in defining the level of care for the urban forest that exist in Edmonds today. Of special note are three policy sources that directly influence the management of urban forestry and land use in Edmonds; The Washington State Growth Management Act (1990), the Edmonds Comprehensive Plan (2016), and the Edmonds Parks Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan (2016) (The PROS Plan is also an element of the Comprehensive Plan.) Their backgrounds, roles, and influences on the development and operation of Edmonds urban forest are discussed below. Big trees were common in Edmonds before its settlement. c a c a� E aD c a� 0 U_ c D 0 M to 0 i Cn 0 N IL c 0 w c aD E 0 Q Introduction 16 Packet Pg. 268 8.1.a Growth Management Act (1990) In 1990, the State Legislature adopted the Washington State Growth Management Act (Chapter 36.70A RCW) on the basis that uncoordinated and unplanned growth posed a threat to the environment, sustainable economic development and the overall quality of life in Washington. Unique among states, the Act requires that municipalities prepare their own comprehensive plans that provide for growth and development in a manner that is locally and regionally consistent, achievable, and affordable. All cities and counties in Washington are required to adopt critical areas regulations by the Growth Management Act (GMA). The GMA defines critical areas as: "Critical areas" include the following areas and ecosystems: a. Wetlands; b. Areas with a critical recharging effect on aquifers used for potable water; c. Fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas; d. Frequently flooded areas; and e. Geologically hazardous areas. I�+* The state of Washington +' , requires the City of Edmonds to manage and protect it's critical areas. ` 1889 Common ground vegetation in wetland areas Cities are required to include the best available science in developing policies and regulations to protect the functions and values of critical areas. Further to that end, jurisdictions must review, evaluate, and, if necessary, revise their critical areas ordinances per an update schedule. Edmonds has an outstanding inventory of critical areas and protection of these critical areas overlaps with the protection of the urban forest. The trees in the urban forest increase soil security to protect wetlands, waterways and flooded areas, and the branches and canopy provide ample real estate for wildlife to call home. It is important that the City plan for all the trees in the urban forest as a whole, not just critical areas. This notion is reinforced in Washington Administrative Code (365-190-060(1)) which specifies when classifying forest land resources that "Cities are encouraged to coordinate their forest resource lands designations with their county and any adjacent jurisdictions. Counties and cities should not review forest resource lands designations solely on a parcel -by -parcel basis." Edmonds has established environmental qualitygoals in support of the legislation and in order to protect critical areas. Since the critical areas regulations must be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, the Comprehensive Plan sets forth the underlying policies for the jurisdiction's critical areas program. wa Trees help protect the function and benefits from critical areas. 17 what Do we Have? Packet Pg. 269 8.1.a The Comprehensive Plan (2016) As an overarching guiding document, the Comprehensive Plan aggregates other city visions and plans into one cohesive document. The Comprehensive Plan is structured by element, then goals, then policies. The Comprehensive Plan contains 9 elements. These elements include goals and policies that can be directly supported through this UFMP. These are the community sustainability elements of the plan and include goals and policies associated with: • Sustainability • Climate Change Goals and Policies, including support for the Kyoto Protocol and the US Mayor's Climate Change Agreement • Community Health • Environmental Quality The urban forest is a key component of the community sustainability element. Goal A in this element seeks to protect environmental quality and sets the first policy (A.1) as to: Ensure that the city's natural vegetation, especially native vegetation, associated with its urban forests, wetlands, and other wildlife habitat areas are protected and enhanced..." A.2 sets to protect and retain the urban forest, native vegetation, and wildlife habitat areas. This includes techniques such as tree retention, which should be integrated into land use and development codes. As the urban forest grows, so too does the habitat and environmental quality. The community culture and urban design element's implementation involves tree policy as well. In this element, the streetscape section defines the many ways that trees enhance the community: "Trees are an asset to the community. They help absorb stormwater, provide habitat for wildlife, clean pollution from the air, and give both summer shade and aesthetic pleasure." In this way, the Comprehensive Plan addresses the policy commitment to Community Health, through the preservation and expansion of the urban forest. Street trees are further explored in the Streetscape Plan developed in 2002 by the Parks, Recreation, and Cultural Services Department and updated in 2006. The Streetscape Plan includes a Street Tree Plan for the downtown corridor. In 2011 the City adopted a "Complete Streets" program which accommodates the needs of all users along streets, including a safe space for pedestrians which necessitates a tree management component. This section concludes with Actions A.1 and A.2, which state that Edmonds should update the Street Tree Plan and develop an Urban Forest Management Plan by the end of 2017. The community sustainability element also includes two other sections that are interconnected with the urban forest; Climate Change and Critical Areas. Recognizing the importance of addressing the issues surrounding the environment and climate change, the City of Edmonds formally expressed support for the Kyoto Protocols, adopted the U.S. Mayors Climate Protection Agreement by Resolution No. 1129, and joined the International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI) by Resolution No. 1130. A crucial component of these climate change policies is the reduction of greenhouse gases with several benchmarks: 1. By 2020, reduce overall emissions of green -house gases in the state to 1990 levels; 2. By 2035, reduce overall emissions of greenhouse gases in the state to twenty-five percent below 1990 levels; 3. By 2050, the state will do its part to reach global climate stabilization levels by reducing overall emissions to fifty percent below 1990 levels, or seventy percent below the state's expected emissions that year. The Edmonds urban forest is vital to the success of meeting these benchmarks. Trees reduce carbon through many ways including; reducing energy demand forshaded buildings, acquiringcarbon dioxide for the photosynthesis, and sequestering carbon. The potential for carbon sequestration is determined by maximum tree sizes, lifespans, growth rates, and tolerances to urban stress. Therefore, growing long- lasting and healthy trees directly contributes to the success of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan climate change goals. c a. c a� E a� �a c M U) 4) 0 U_ c M D w 0 M I 0 I o� 0 N a. 2 U_ U) c 0 E w c as E U 0 r a What Do We Have? 18 Packet Pg. 270 8.1.a The PROS Plan (2016) The Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan provides comprehensive guidance on the management and development of Edmonds' parks, recreation and open spaces, and the services provided by the Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services Department. The PROS plan has been regularly updated (1996, 2001, 2008, and 2014) to remain relevant to Edmonds as the city evolves. Edmonds updates the PROS Plan and Community Cultural Plan on a six-yearcycle, in alignmentwith the requirements of the Washington State Recreation and Conservation Office (RCO) to maintain eligibility for federal and state grant programs. To this end, the PROS plan contains detailed data on numerous species and habitats in the city. The PROS Plan is also an important tool in meeting Washington's Growth Management Act (GMA) requirements and achieving the important citywide goals outlined in the Strategic Action Plan (April 2015). The PROS Plan defines seven goals, of which Goal 4.0 specifically addresses urban forestry. Goal 4.0 (Natural Resource and Habitat Conservation) seeks to preserve and provide access to natural resources for habitat conservation, recreation, and environmental education. The eight objectives discuss preserving and protecting areas with critical habitats and natural resources. Of special importance to the UFMP is Objective 4.5, which states "Expand the urban forest and increase tree canopy in Edmonds". Under each goal, the PROS Plan recommends projects and initiatives. A recommended project (4.G) under Goal 4 is: "Steward the urban forest using appropriate maintenance of street and park trees, clear removal and replacement policies and providing information about urban forestry to property owners." This demonstrates the value of the urban forest to the people of Edmonds as manifested through existing official documents addressing the urban forest and urban tree canopy. 19 what Do we Have? Purchasing of Forested Properties The City's policies with regard to the acquisition of open space (including the potential purchase of forested properties) are contained with the Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan. Land acquisition is included in the capital project budget and the PROS plan notes that "expansions of the parks system will target the gaps identified in this plan and take advantage of opportunities as they emerge. Due to the constrained nature of Edmonds, this approach will require vigilance and proactive pursuit of potential land acquisition opportunities for both parks and open spaces. The City's inclusion of this item in the capital projects list recognizes the importance of swift action when rare property acquisition opportunities become available." A specific policy addressing the purchase of forested properties could be considered for adding to the PROS plan to recognize the potential of maintaining the City's tree cover through the selective purchase of forest properties as opportunities arise. Forested properties can be valuable acquisitions to maintain City's tree cover. Packet Pg. 271 8.1.a Summary Considerations for Planning These documents demonstrate the existing regulations and policies within which care for the urban forest is mandated. It is clear from the scope defined within these documents that the values of the Edmonds community, and Washington State at large, require that urban forest management include strategies to improve the care and conservation of all trees. This includes updating the Street Tree Plan, consideration for improving and preserving trees near waterways, critical areas, habitats, and on private parcels. Equipped with this policy background and mandate to manage the urban forest, it's essential to plan with as much knowledge about the community tree resource as possible. •�I The PROS plan (2016) has specific goals for the City to steward the urban forest. Community Tree Resource Trees belonging to the public, in parks, along rights -of - way and around City facilities are the community tree resource. These trees can be the most actively managed population by the City and provide the best indicators to showcase its vision of a well -managed and sustainable urban forest condition. A well -managed urban forest is healthier and more resilient to pests, disease, and climate fluctuations. As a result, a well -managed urban forest is also more cost-efficient. As urban forests evolve over time, managers revise their strategies for individual tree species based on past performance and emerging prospects. Because trees are relatively long-lived organisms, urban forests, like those in Edmonds, are often a combination of well -adapted, high-performance species mixed with some species that may be less desirable and require more attention. There is a widely accepted guiding rule in tree resource management that no single species should represent greater than 10% of the total population, and no single genus more than 20% (Clark et al, 1997). Achieving a diverse population of trees can help to minimize detrimental consequences in the event of storms, drought, disease, pests, or other stressors that can severely affect an urban forest and the flow of benefits and costs over time. Catastrophic pathogens, such as Dutch elm disease (Ophiostoma ulmi), emerald ash borer (Agrilus planipennis) are both examples of unexpected, devastating, and costly pests and pathogens that highlight the importance of diversity and the balanced distribution of species and genera. Current operations in the City that care for the community trees do not keep suitable records of their tree resource to summarize within this UFMP. Publictrees along major arterials or high -profile areas of the City are well-known and routinely cared for by City Staff, but as an overall management tool, the City does not maintain data about these trees as a collective inventory of their green infrastructure assets. Managing for appropriate tree species can help control maintenance costs, reduce damage to infrastructure, and manage the need for pest and disease control measures. c a c a� E a� �a c 0 U) a� L0 U_ c 0 L w L 0 M I 0 o� I 0 N a 2 U_ Q U) c 0 w c as U 0 Q What Do We Have? 20 Packet Pg. 272 8.1.a Tree Canopy Cover The amount and distribution of leaf surface area is the driving force behind the urban forest's ability to produce benefits for the community (Clark et al, 1997). As canopy cover increases, so do the benefits. Tree canopy is the layer of leaves, branches, and stems of trees and other woody plants that cover the ground when viewed from above. Understanding the location and extent of tree canopy is critical to developing and implementing sound management strategies that will promote the smart growth and sustainability of Edmonds' urban forest and the invaluable benefits it provides. In addition to understanding the tree canopy as a whole, the quality of the urban tree canopy is often categorized by the amount of fragmentation. Often, the health and diversity of the overall canopy will vastly improve when there is less fragmented canopy, and there are more linkages between multiple patches of forest. These categories of canopy include: • Core Canopy - Tree canopy that exists within and relatively far from the forest/non-forest boundary (i.e., forested areas surrounded by more forested areas). • Perforated Canopy - Tree canopy that defines the boundary between core forests and relatively small clearings (perforations) within the forest landscape. • Patch Canopy - Tree canopy of a small -forested area that is surrounded by non -forested land cover. • Edge Canopy - Tree canopy that defines the boundary between core forests, and large core forests and large non -forested land cover features, approximately 328 feet. When large enough, edge canopy may appear to be unassociated with core forests. The City of Edmonds completed a canopy assessment in June 2017 using a heads -up digitizing approach and high resolution (4.8 inch), leaf -on aerial imagery captured on August 7th, 2015. The overall assessment does not distinguish between publicly -owned and privately -owned trees because trees provide benefits to the community beyond property lines. The results of the study provide a clear picture of the extent and distribution of tree canopy within Edmonds. The data developed during the assessment becomes an important part of the City's GIS database. It also provides a foundation for developing community goals and urban forest policies. With these data, managers can determine: • The location and extent of canopy over time (tracking changes) • The location of available planting space (potential planting area) • The best strategies to increase canopy in underserved areas • The data, combined with existing and emerging urban forestry research and applications, can provide additional guidance in two ways: • Finding a balance between growth and preservation • Identifying and assessing urban forestry opportunities. An example of perforated canopy in a park setting. 21 what Do We Have? Packet Pg. 273 8.1.a Canopy Cover Summary ♦ 34.1% impervious surfaces, including roads, parking lots, and structures (2,080 acres) The City of Edmonds encompasses a total area of 9.5 square miles (6,095 acres) with 1,844 acres of ♦ From 2005 to 2015 tree canopy decreased from tree canopy (Figure 1). This total area includes 8.9 32.3% to 30.3% square miles of land and 0.6 square miles of water. ♦ Total potential canopy is 57.4%, considering By analyzing high -resolution aerial imagery, Davey suitable planting sites (1,651 acres) and the Resource Group (DRG) determined the following land existing canopy (1,844 acres), for a total of cover characteristics within the City of Edmonds: 3,495 acres ♦ 30.3% existing canopy, including trees and ♦ Private residential properties have most of the woody shrubs (525 acres) canopy (83.0%), followed by public (12.9%), and ♦ 1.6% (99 acres) dry vegetation and bare ground commercial (4.1%) properties. a c ♦ 6.6% (402 acres) open water, where tree canopy ♦ Among parks in Edmonds, Southwest County E is unfeasible Park has the most canopy cover (117 acres) followed by Yost Memorial Park (44 acres) and ♦ 27.4% (1,670 acres) of grass and low-lying Meadowdale Beach Park (26 acres) vegetation L 0 U_ f-YJ' , *ems +� �_ __ ''�+' � ,"'• _ � *�' , . � .. MI to { _ Y LL F+ * y{ l - +ram ,,,, - •�," _ �„ Q Ip :"Mill +f $ �;* r • #'' Jam• •F a ,,f ' r �#+r'1 � . 'f Y•:� a ' err. �:. }.} � � _ Detail image of canopy cover in portion of the Edmonds "bowl" area. What Do We Have? 22 Packet Pg. 274 Land Cover 8.1.a Water 7% Bare Soils 2% Grass/Vegetation 27% Figure 1: Land Cover City Limits Tree Canopy CraWLow-Lying Vegetation impervious Surfaces 1 Bare Soil M Open Water 0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles Figure 1: Land Cover 2.3 what Do we Have? Packet Pg. 275 Canopy Fragmentation As a part of the UTC assessment, Edmonds' existing UTC was analyzed for fragmentation to discover the distribution of canopy (Figure 3). The overall health 4 _ of the urban ecosystem is highly dependent on the ability of the trees, plants, wildlife, insects, and humans to interact collectively as a whole. Often, the health and diversity of the overall canopy will vastly improve by creating linkages between multiple patches of forest. Canopy fragmentation data serves as a valuable managementtool duetothe importanceof Edmonds' critical areas and environmental stewardship. The + analysis found that Edmonds' urban forest includes the following: • 10.3% 190 acres of Core Canopy c �a a r c a� E aD c ( ) o Figure 2: Fragmentation Comparison U- • 8.2% (151 acres) of Perforated Canopy Wildlife corridors (bottom) link habitats and lead to • 55.5% (1,023 acres) of Patch Canopy improving habitat quality while fragmentation (top) • 26.0% (480 acres) of Edge Canopy leads to isolation and declining habitat quality. o M Ir LL Y 'L • r }•. Y_ ry ; _ O LU E }y _ Ir Detailed image of canopy fragmentation showing canopy categorized as core, perforated, edge and patch forest. What Do We Have? 24 Packet Pg. 276 8.1.a Forest Fragmentation Patch Forest 56% Core Forest 10%ww- I or Perforated +' Forest +Few 8% Edge Forest - 26% Ijljll}I Figure 3: Forest Fragmentation ' k I�Ril ti" C++MW4T - Fu3ET OR S7 { .. . t Dw f � 75 16 City Limb } k�' •_'411 r Core Forest Edgy* Forst f877iST -r <' Patch Forest : ^ k ...lath.}- Perforated forest i N 'l l:liv r[ 0 0.25 0.5 1 4+1Q IJNUER WILY MfRes Figure 3: Forest Fragmentation 25 What Do We Have? Q Packet Pg. 277 8.1.a Park Canopy Cover The City of Edmonds includes 47 parks covering 344 acres (5.6% of all land area) (Figure 4). Edmonds' parks have an average tree canopy cover of 44.1%. Within those parks, canopy varied depending on site and size. Edmonds' largest park, Southwest County Park (119 acres), has 117 acres of tree canopy and an average canopy cover of 98.7%. The second-largest, Yost Memorial Park (44 acres) has 41 acres of canopy cover, which represents 93.5% of the land area. The high canopy cover of Yost Memorial Park reflects that it is one of the few areas of native vegetation that remain in Edmonds. The park contains mixed stands of douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii), sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis), western red cedar (Thuja Canopy cover in Yost Park. plicata), red alder (Alnus rugosa), bigleaf maple (Acer macrophyllum) and western hemlock (Tsuga heterophylla), which offer a glimpse into the natural history of the area. Centennial Plaza is the smallest park (less than 0.1 acres) with 0.02 acres of canopy (9.9 % canopy cover). Of the four largest parks (Southwest County, Yost Memorial, Meadowdale Beach, and Pine Ridge), all have high tree canopy potential (greater than 96.7%). However, of these parks, only Pine Ridge Park is not currently near maximum potential canopy. An acceptable strategy is to focus attention on the parks where there is a much larger gap between current canopy cover and potential canopy cover. The 5 biggest parks are listed in Table 7 of this section . c a. c a� E as ca c 0 U) a) L 0 LL r_ M L M L T M m I 0 Os I 0 N a. Q U) c 0 E w c m E z U 0 r Q What Do We Have? 26 Packet Pg. 278 8.1.a Tree Canopy By Park Meadowdale---- Beach Park Table 2: Tree Canopy of 5 Largest Parks Park Name — .. .. Southwest 118.55 117.05 County Park Yost Memorial 44.14 41.28 93.53 97.45 Park Meadowdale Beach Parma 54 25.16 98. 99.77 Southwest c County Park Pine Ridge Park 23.78 21.36 89.83 96.66 (L r c E aD Hutt Park Seaview Park N Sierra Park a) o u_ Hummingbird Hill Park L D Yost Park Maplewood r Park p M Edmonds 1 � (.0 City Park i Pine Ridge Park QI � � Edmonds -- r N Marsh a � a u_ � Q O �- E Under 15% � W 1J4 — Jl!'J4 4 E dry / 30 fO - 45 p/ Ig ++ {y 45% - 0% Q Over 60°la Wes Figure 4: Tree Canopy by Park 27 What Do We Have? Packet Pg. 279 8.1.a Critical Areas The Washington State Growth Management (GMA) mandates that all cities and counties Washington are required to adopt critical ar regulations. The GMA states that critical ar include the following categories and ecosystems: • Wetlands • Areas with a critical recharging effect on aquifers used for potable water • Fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas • Frequently flooded areas; and • Geologically hazardous areas • Biodiversity and Corridor Areas (Breeding and Refuge) Act in • Nesting Habitat (great blue heron) eas ♦ Sensitive Aquatic Habitat (Trout/Salmon) eas • Sensitive Habitat (bald eagle) Analysis of critical areas in conjunction with tree canopy can reveal the important relationship that trees provide in the conservation and protection of these environments. Two critical area designations are especially important to urban forest management in Edmonds; fish and wildlife habitat areas and steep slopes (Tables 8 & 9). Fish and wildlife habitat areas include high priority habitats and species that have been identified for conservation and management. DRG analyzed the relationship between forest fragmentation and the following priority habitat and species list categories: • Wetlands Area Biodiversity areas and corridors, identified by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, are areas of habitat that are relatively important to various species of nativefish and wildlife. In Edmonds, most of the biodiversity areas and corridors are in core (58.6%) or edge (21.4%) forest. This is congruent with what theory would suggest, because corridors are continuous areas of habitat. Nesting habitat for the great blue heron is comprised of several elements; the nesting colony, year-round and seasonal buffers, foraging habitat, and a pre - nesting congregation area. For a given nesting area, habitats are delineated by a buffer created from the outermost perimeter of great blue heron nests. In addition, there is a larger seasonal buffer to reduce human noise pollution during the breeding months (February - September). Nesting habitat in Edmonds is located primarily in non -forest areas (58%). This value warrants further investigation to determine optimal canopy levels. Table 3: Acres of Sensitive Area by Fragmentation Biodiversity Areas And Corridor 251.82 1.35 53.94 27.09 147.67 21.78 Nesting Habitat Area (Great Blue Heron) 2.55 0.03 0.64 0.00 0.40 1.48 Sensitive Aquatic Habitat Area 118.33 10.52 35.32 4.61 16.53 51.36 Sensitive Habitat Area 77.83 14.46 9.28 0.18 2.70 51.21 Wetlands Area 80.65 5.48 13.56 IlIM 0.51 1.76 59.36 c a. Y c a� E a� �a c M U) 0 LL c M M L D w 0 M I 0 o� I 0 N a. 2 U_ Q U) c 0 E w c m E z U 0 Y Y Q What Do We Have? 28 Packet Pg. 280 8.1.a Sensitive aquatic habitat is determined by in -stream physical characteristics (e.g., temperature, water quantity, structure, substrate conditions, etc.). However, sensitive aquatic habitat is also strongly influenced by watershed processes beyond the waterline. This includes canopy cover, riparian condition, large woody debris, impervious surfaces and stormwater discharge, sediment delivery, road location and maintenance, watershed hydrology, and nutrient dynamics (Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, 2009). In Edmonds, 43.4% of sensitive aquatic habitat is found in non -forest areas. The second largest forest fragmentation category for sensitive aquatic habitat is edge forest (29.9%). Nesting habitat for bald eagles is typically defined by areas of large, mature trees close to large bodies of water and generally buffered from human activity (Department of Fish and Wildlife, 2016). This nesting behavior is reflected in the 11.9% of nesting area located in edge type forests of Edmonds. However, nest trees are often among the largest trees in a forest patch (Department of Fish and Wildlife, 2016). This tree preference is reflected in 18.6% of nesting habitat being found in patch forest. Around wetlands, the Washington Department of Ecology defines vegetated areas adjacent to aquatic resources as buffers that can reduce impacts from adjacent land uses (Washington Department of Ecology, 2011). These buffers also provide some of the terrestrial habitats necessary for wetland - dependent species that require both aquatic and terrestrial habitats. The quality of these buffers could be described by their canopy fragmentation, where 73.6% of wetlands were classified in non -forest areas, and 16.8% were classified in edge forest, with only 2.2% in the core forest. The protection of steep slopes against landslides and erosion is a key benefit of vegetation (Washington Department of Ecology, 2011). Trees provide several benefits to the structural integrity of slopes and the prevention of soil erosion: Foliage intercepts rainfall, causing absorptive and evaporative losses that reduce rainfall available for infiltration. Roots extract moisture from the soil which is lost to the atmosphere via transpiration, leading to a lower pore -water pressure. Roots reinforce the soil, increasing soil shear strength. It is important to understand the significance of steep slopes because of their influences on local wildlife and habitat quality. For example, increased erosion can negatively impact spawning salmon by increasing sediment and particulates in streams and other water bodies. In this way, riparian vegetation that prevents erosion protects critical habitat for wildlife. Most steep slopes (66.1%) are in areas with tree canopy. This figure presents an excellent baseline, as trees are a vital tool for securing soil and minimizing erosion. Among all areas with slopes over 12 degrees, 66.1% of the area is canopy, 14.3% is impervious, 19.0% is pervious, and 0.6% is bare soil. Table 4: Percent of Sensitive Area by Fragmentation Biodiversity Areas And Corridor Nesting Habitat Area (Great Blue Heron) 2.55 1.36 24.96 0.00 15.73 58.01 Sensitive Aquatic Habitat Area 118.33 8.89 29.85 3.89 13.97 Sensitive Habitat Area 77.83 18.58 11.92 0.23 3.47 65.80 Wetlands Area 80.65 6.79 16.81 0.63 2.18 73.60 29 What Do We Have? Packet Pg. 281 8.1.a Considerations for Planting Opportunities Edmonds' existing tree canopy covers 30.3% of the City, and decision -makers can set a target canopy cover goal to pursue. Regardless of the canopy coverage goals established by the City, the following are planting opportunities that may be pursued in order to maintain and potentially increase the existing canopy coverage: • Incentivize tree planting on private property. • Increase canopy with tree planting in areas of patch and fragmented canopy to reduce forest fragmentation and improve wildlife habitat and corridors. Conducting outreach to the community as an important tool for engaging public interest and support. Define goals and identify actions that will support these goal(s). • Develop clear policies and standards to meet the 30% native vegetation requirement codified by ECDC 23.90.040.0 (Retention of Vegetation on Subdividable, Undeveloped Parcels) in undeveloped (or redeveloped) Subdividable lands zoned as RS-12 or RS-20, that contain a stream or stream buffer, or a wetland or wetland buffer. Park trees in Edmonds. Currently, forestry operations in the City do not document the community tree resource according to industry best management practices. A public tree inventory is important because it provides information on species diversity, forest age, and relative performance of different tree species. An inventory that is maintained with continued updates also facilitates planning and prioritization of tree maintenance duties. Based on this assessment, urban forest managers have the following opportunities: Establish and continually update a public tree inventory. Integrate maintenance cycles with the public tree inventory database. • Study genus/species compositions to ensure best -management diversity recommendations are being followed. What Do We Have? .30 Packet Pg. 282 8.1.a Existing Urban Forest Practices There are three departments within the City of Edmonds that have influence over the management of the urban forest; Development Services (DS), Public Works and Utilities (PW), and Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services (PRC). Although they share and communicate any issues related to tree care and urban forest management, decision -making authority is determined based on the location of the trees. There is no specific staff person or leadership team with overarching responsibilities forguiding the management of the entire urban forest in Edmonds. Tree Maintenance Tree maintenance is important at all stages of tree life, but is especially critical for young trees as they benefit from early structural pruning and training. Minor corrections, such as removing double leaders or crowded branches, can be conducted at ground Table 5: Decision Matrix for Urban Forest Management in Edmonds Locations Department!Tree City Permits for Tree Removal Trees on Private Development Permits for Tree Property Services Pruning Permits for Tree Planting Hazardous Tree Parks, Inspections Trees in Parks Recreation and Tree Pruning g Cultural Tree Removal Services Tree Planting Public Works Hazardous Tree Trees within and Utilities Inspections City Rights -of- (with Parks' Tree Pruning Way assistance in Tree Removal downtown) Tree Planting 31 What Do We Have? level with minimal cost when a tree is young. However, if left unattended, defects can evolve into very expensive structural issues and increase the risk of failure as trees mature, at which point it may be impossible to correct the issue without causing greater harm. Over -mature trees require more frequent inspection and removal of dead or dying limbs to reduce the risk of unexpected failure. By establishing a budget for maintenance, urban forest managers can plan the necessary tree care at the appropriate life stage when it is most beneficial and cost-effective. At the City, tree maintenance is addressed most frequently with reactive tactics. As issues related to trees are identified by City Staff, work is prioritized based on existing and available budgets. Planning associated with tree management on public properties is minimal with priority attention given to ensuring the successful establishment of new tree plantings and responding to hazardous tree conditions. Currently, the Parks Department performs certain routine tree inspections and provides limited proactive maintenance activities (typically associated with the care of trees after planting to encourage successful establishment). Within City rights -of -way, tree issues are uncovered as part of routine safety inspections of sidewalks and streets, where trees are only identified when infrastructure is damaged by roots, or when tree hazards are observed by public works staff. Similarly, in City parks, trees will be prioritized for maintenance when safety concerns are observed through routine park maintenance activities. Parks trees require routine inspections and maintenance for public safety. Packet Pg. 283 8.1.a Tree Maintenance Budgets The majority of tree maintenance costs are accounted for as general line items through the parks department budget. As part of the annual Tree City USA application, departments will summarize their expenses. In 2017, the Edmonds' urban forestry expenditures were $7.74 per capita, which is more than the minimum $2 per capita for Tree City USA designation and more than the $7.50 national average reported by the National Arbor Day Foundation. Documented Edmonds' expenditures have been in the range of $3 per capita in prior years. Using the recent Urban Tree Canopy assessment as a benchmark estimate, Edmonds' urban forest produces about $1,567,000 in environmental benefits and is maintained with a 2017 budget of approximately $319,542. Service Levels To assess current urban forest workload and staffing levels, an estimated 11 city staff members were identified as persons who work with tree issues on at least an intermittent basis every week. From those who are involved with forestry issues or operations on a more regular time basis, 3 individuals were identified with a quantifiable amount of time each week working with trees or tree -related issues. Table 6: 2017 City Urban Forestry Expenditures tone"M11MERTIM Tree Planting and Initial Care $4,848 Tree Maintenance $79,779 Tree Removals $37,565 Management $62,771 Volunteer Activities $134,579 TOTAL $319,542 Budget Per Capita $7.74 UTC Estimate of Benefits $1,567,000 Overall, there is evidence of good interdepartmental cooperation. These general conclusions about the shared responsibilities among staff resources at the City are very important when the City evaluates future staffing needs for urban forestry. Currently, no one single position is designated as a Full -Time Employee (FTE) dedicated to urban forestry. Table 7: Current Urban Forest Workload and Staffing Levels City Services UrbanCommon Related Activities Hours per Development plan review for Permit Intake compliance with tree and Review protection codes 2 Public inquiries (online, phone, and counter) Code Investigating and resolving Enforcement & tree complaints Complaint Investigating and resolving 2 infrastructure damage Investigation complaints Tree planting and Parks & Public establishment Tree Structural pruning on smaller 40-60 Maintenance trees Inspection and identification of hazardous trees Contract Managing contract tree crews 1 Management Emergency Community Service Requests 0 Response Response Management Urban Forest Management Comprehensive Plan stewardship (Long-range) Federal, state grant <1 Planning procurement Tree City USA applications Volunteer events Community Coordinated tree planting Education Action Neighborhood association 1 and Outreach support Website content and public education Tree Board Addressing public issues 1 Meetings related to trees c a. c as E a� M c 0 U) a� `0 u_ c 0 w 0 M �I 0 o� I 0 N a. 2 u_ U) c 0 E Lu c m E t U 2 r Q What Do We Have? .32 Packet Pg. 284 8.1.a Staff Training The science of arboriculture, and the management of urban forests are domains that are increasingly recognized as special areas of expertise. Credentials are increasingly requested by many municipalities as evidence of competency. Bachelor's degrees in Forestry, Urban Forestry, Environmental Sciences, and Horticulture are often the base requirements for leadership roles in urban forest management. Professional credentials can also demonstrate competency, with the most widely accepted credentials in Washington State coming from the International Society of Arboriculture (ISA). Image of a tree with a co -dominant branch defect (middle stem). The city has access to trained staff qualified to provide expertise for identification of these tree safety risks. The City provides on -going training to any staff handling tree maintenance equipment, including chainsaw, chipper, and lift -truck safety. Stakeholder interviews revealed that landscape maintenance workers in Edmonds receive no formal training on structural pruning or tree care. The following is a summary description of staff resources and training within individual City departments: • In Development Services, staff are trained to interpret ordinances related to trees, but rely on reports by ISA certified arborists when necessary to render decisions. Staff within development services have backgrounds in Urban Planning and one (1) person with has an advanced degree in Forestry. There are no ISA certified arborists within development services staff. • The Department of Public Works and Utilities has a director with advanced degrees in Biology and Aquatic Biology. In addition, the department has engineers on staff who can successfully consider relevant tree issues in terms of asset and infrastructure management, but tree care expertise is not required for any staff in this department. Tree related issues are resolved based on previous experiences and through hired consultations with ISA certified arborists when necessary. • The Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services Department has two staff members who provide expertise on urban forestry topics. The first is an ISA certified arborist who is referenced by all City departments and citizen groups for opinions on the best practices associated with tree care. There is also a staff member who has an advanced degree in Forest Ecology who works with citizen groups on tree planting and stewardship projects. Tree Acquisition and Quality Control The City's approach to acquiring trees is not guided by any formal standard practices that ensure the quality of trees during acquisition. As trees are planted, there is no planned follow-up or warranties managed with new trees. 33 what Do we Have? Packet Pg. 285 8.1.a Tree City USA The Arbor Day Foundation is a 501c3 nonprofit conservation and education organization founded in 1972 in Nebraska, United States, by John Rosenow. It is the largest nonprofit membership organization dedicated to tree planting. The Foundation offers Tree City USA certification. Cities can earn Tree City USA certification by meeting four (4) core standards of quality urban forestry management: maintaining a tree board or department, having a community tree ordinance, spending at least $2 per capita on urban forestry, and celebrating Arbor Day. Currently, the City of Edmonds dedicates $319,542.20 towards total community forestry expenditure, and with a population of roughly 41,260, has a per capita investment of $7.74. The Arbor Day Foundation has recognized this per capita investment, as well as recognizing the City of Edmonds' community tree ordinance and observance of Arbor Day. Native Trees Trees native to the Pacific Northwest are well -suited to our climate. They also tend to provide good habit for local wildlife. Many native trees, both coniferous and broadleaved, are part of the City's urban forest. They are currently encouraged in public and private plantings but not necessarily required, except in designated critical areas for wildlife habitat and/or wetlands. More information about native trees and their value is likely to be part of an upcoming round of community education in Edmonds. Cone from a douglas fir. (Photo by Peter Stevens CC BY) An example of some native trees for the Pacific Northwest include the following,: Broadleaved Trees • Big -Leaf Maple • Black Cottonwood • Oregon Ash • Pacific Willow • Red Alder • Vine Maple Conifers • Douglas Fir • Grand Fir • Noble Fir • Shore Pine • Sitka Spruce • Western Hemlock • Western Larch • Western Red Cedar • Western White Pine 1 A more comprehensive list can be found in Appendix F Leaves of a big leaf maple. What Do We Have? 34 Packet Pg. 286 8.1.a Major and Emerging Diseases and Pests Another important aspect to tree maintenance is staying alert to managing emerging diseases and pests that can be costly to control with individual trees. For sustainability of the entire urban forest, addressing both potential and actual problems is critical. Further information on the pests and diseases that threaten the forest ecosystems in Washington can be found at: • USDA's Forest Service website • Pacific Northwest Pest Management Handbook • Collier Arbor Care website —Top 20 Tree and Shrub Problems in the PNW • Washington State Department of Natural Resources, Forest Health Among the many diseases and pests that affect trees, City Staff and residents should remain alert to the following: Diseases • Laminated Root Rot (LRR) is the most important disease affecting Douglas -fir caused by the fungal pathogen Coniferiporia sulphurascens. In young stands regenerated following harvesting, dead or missing trees will be associated with large stumps. These decayed trees will serve as an inoculum source for neighboring trees to become infected, as their roots grow in contact with infected stumps/roots. Fungal growth invades the heartwood and sapwood, resulting in reduced uptake of water and nutrients, with weakened support of the upper portion of the tree. Infected trees are susceptible to windthrow, and there may be trees in a group in various stages of decay and dying. Live trees with LRR display symptoms of shortened terminal growth, sparse foliage, smaller needles, chlorosis (yellowing) and stress cone crops. Trees can fall over before developing obvious symptoms, or die standing. The disease is very difficult to manage in an urban setting (USFS, 2017). • Armillaria Root Rot (ARR) affects the roots of numerous tree species, notably Douglas -fir and other Firs and Pines, as well as many hardwood species. Armillaria ostoyae is the primary fungal pathogen in the Pacific Northwest, although A. mellea can also be involved in tree decline and mortality. ARR disease is usually associated with stress conditions, particularly drought. The fungus survives for many years in infected stumps, roots and organic matter in the soil. Honey -colored mushrooms are typically produced at the base of infected trees in the fall. Typical symptoms include chlorotic foliage, distress cone crops, significant resin flow, decline and death. The fungus typically produces black shoestring -like structures called rhizomorphs on the bark at the base of the tree or in the soil (OSU, 2018). • Verticillium Wilt (VW) is a serious disease of many tree hosts, but is especially problematic on Maple species. Verticillium dahliae is a soil -borne fungus that persists in the soil for decades. The fungus infects roots and grows into the xylem where it colonizes the vascular elements. Its presence (mycelia and spores) plus defense compounds produced by the host clogs the xylem elements, preventing the flow of water and nutrients in the tree. Wilting results, and is exacerbated during periods of drought. Leaves on one side of the tree affected by VW or on one branch suddenly wilt and die. Subsequently, other branches will wilt as the disease progresses. Excised branches will have vascular discoloration which is diagnostic of the disease. Infected trees may survive for years or die within weeks. Once infected, a tree will not likely recover and will require removal. Tree injections of fungicides are not usually effective (OSU, 2018). • Swiss Needle Cast (SNC) is the name of the foliage disease of Douglas -fir caused by the fungal pathogen Phaeocryptopus gaeumannii. SNC is known as a "cast" disease because it causes the premature shedding of needles (or casting) from the tree, resulting in sparse tree crowns and reduced growth. Although it is 35 what Do we Have? Packet Pg. 287 8.1.a called "Swiss" needle cast, the fungus is native to the Western United States throughout the range of Douglas -fir. SNC disease symptoms include chlorotic needles and decreased needle retention, resulting in sparse crowns and reduced diameter and height growth (OSU, 2017). Mortality from the disease is considered rare, but tree care and maintenance of this disease can be expensive and necessary in an urban setting. • Leaf Blight (LB) is a serious disease affecting Pacific Madrone caused by the fungal pathogen Phacidiopycnis washingtonensis. At least a dozen fungi can cause leaf spots and dead areas on leaves; this is probably the most significant cause of damage to the host. Older, lower leaves are infected by spores disseminated by wind or rain during wet weather in the fall. Trees located in creek bottoms, valleys and the forest understory are most susceptible to LB. If wet weather persists, infection may be severe and result in significant defoliation. Under these conditions, the fungus can also infect green shoots. Pruning dead branches to provide better air circulation and raking and destroying fallen leaves will help to reduce fungal inoculum and subsequent infection (OSU, 2008). • Anthracnose (A) affects a wide variety of shade trees, especially Maple, Oak and Sycamore. The closely related fungi Discula (Maple, Sycamore) and Apiognomonia (Oak) are the causal agents of the disease. The disease is favored by warm, wet springs and several rounds of infection can occur, each defoliating the tree, resulting in a tree much more prone to subsequent drought stress. Lesions on the leaves are typically associated and limited by the veins, resulting in discrete necrotic areas. In particularly susceptible trees under ideal environmental conditions, twig cankers can also develop. It is important to rake up and destroy fallen leaves, prune out twig cankers and water trees during dry periods (OSU, 2018). • Sudden Oak Death was discovered in California in the mid 1990's, has spread into southern Oregon (2001) and was found (and has subsequently been contained or eliminated) in a small area in Kitsap County two years ago. The causal fungus Phytophthora ramorum primarily infects species of Oaks, but can also infect a wide range of other hosts, including Camellia, Rhododendron, Blueberry and other landscape plants. The fungus is waterborne and can be spread in streams or other forms of moving water. Symptoms on Oaks include bleeding cankers on the trunk, dieback of the foliage and mortality. Symptoms on other plants can vary from leafspots to leaf blight to twig dieback, but do not usually result in death of the host. Quarantines are in place to prevent further spread of SOD, largely from nurseries (COMTF, 2019). Insects • Asian Long -Horned Beetle (ALB), is an invasive insect that feeds on a wide variety of trees in the United States, eventually killing them. The beetle is native to China and the Korean Peninsula. Signs of ALB start to show about three to four (3-4) years after infestation, with tree death occurring in ten to fifteen (10-15) years depending on the tree's overall health and site conditions. Infested trees do not recover, nor do they regenerate. There are a broad number of tree species this insect will feed in and most common deciduous trees in Edmonds are at risk. • Tent Caterpillar (TC) is a serious defoliator of broadleaf trees and shrubs in most areas of the western U.S. Tree hosts include Red Alder, Cottonwood, Willow, Ash, Pacific Madrone, and many fruit trees. White silky tents appear soon after bud break. As the larvae grow in size, the tents also increase in size. Individual branches near these tents are totally defoliated. Entire trees may be defoliated by TC. After feeding has been concluded, the larvae will turn into moths within a cocoon. Eggs are laid on the twigs and branches where they overwinter in protected masses. Individual tents can be physically removed, preferably in the early morning hours when the larvae are contained in the tent (USFS, 2008). c a c a� a� ca c M U) 0 U_ c M L D w ;a 0 M �I 0 I rn 0 N a 2 U_ Q U) c 0 E w c as E U 0 r a What Do we Have? 36 Packet Pg. 288 8.1.a • Cooley Spruce Gall Adelgid (CSGA) is a serious pest of Spruce and Douglas -fir trees. It swarms in the spring when the new needles emerge. Crawler nymphs form galls at the branch tips. These galls are initially green, becoming red and eventually dry out. These affected branches cease their growth, and if enough branches are affected, the tree may be killed. White cottony specks will also cover the entire branch. Trees with fewer galls may be unsightly and foliage can be discolored and distorted. Most outbreaks of CSGA do not warrant control measures (NRC, 2015). • Pine Bark Adelgid (PBA) feeds on the bark of pines and spruce. They form cottony or wooly masses on the twigs, branches or trunk. Heavy infestations will turn the entire area white. Small trees will be severely affected, resulting in chlorotic needles and stunting or premature death. Small egg clusters are laid in the early spring by the adults. Crawlers move to other areas of the tree or to other trees nearby. PBA can be removed by hand, preferably done when the infestation has just begun (OSU, 2018). • Bronze Birch Borer (BBB) is an emerging pest in western Washington that has migrated from eastern Washington in recent years. Periods of extended summer drought have weakened birch trees and made them more susceptible to this pest which can severely damage or kill the trees. Chlorotic leaves and sparse upper branches are the first symptoms that homeowners usually notice from BBB attack. Close examination will reveal lumpy bark and half -moon - shaped beetle exit holes (WSU, 2008). Symptoms of BBB Include Dying Top 37 what Do we Have? • Douglas -fir Tussock Moth (DFTM) is a moth found in Western North America. Its population periodically erupts in cyclical outbreaks (Wickman et al., 1998). Outbreaks of the Douglas -fir tussock moth appear to develop almost explosively, and then usually subside abruptly after a year or two. The caterpillars feed on the needles of Douglas fir, true fir, and spruce in summer. Forestry management to prevent tree damage from tussock moth outbreaks include four activities: early detection, evaluation, suppression, and prevention. These four activities must be well integrated to ensure adequate protection from the pest. • Emerald Ash Borer (EAB) has killed hundreds of millions of ash trees in North America. The EAB is a destructive, non-native, wood -boring pest that exclusively kills both stressed and healthy ash trees 2-3 years after infestation (NASPF, 2005). EAB is a jewel beetle native to Northwestern Asia. EAB larvae feed on the vascular tissue of trees and populations grow exponentially. This pest has been identified as moving slowly into the Western U.S. and is considered a catastrophic pest for ash tree populations. • Other Diseases and Pests. Information on specific diseases and insects that damage trees in our region have been identified by the Washington State Department of Natural Resources. Current online information is at: www.dnr.wa.gov/ ForestHealth. A. Asian Long -Horned Beetle B. Bronze Birch Borer C. Douglas fir Tussock Moth D. Emerald Ash Borer Packet Pg. 289 8.1.a Regulatory Framework The City of Edmonds provides regulations for several components relevant to urban forestry in the Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code. These regulations are designed to: • Authorize the power of government to manage the urban forest • Define street trees and, as appropriate, municipal responsibilities for their care • Enumerate tree related fees and penalties • Create regulations associated with tree clearing on private land • Require tree protection during construction • Classify critical areas or buffers These different regulations cover tree related topics on a range of land types, and all influence the direction and management of urban forestry programs. The following summaries outline the chapters and sections of city code. Authorization of Power The legitimacy of Edmonds' city government to manage forestry domains and the definition of those domains fall under the authorization of power: • Chapter 18.45 provides for the City's Planning Division Manager to direct and enforce City codes related to land clearing and tree cutting on public land and private property. It exempts Public Works, Parks and Fire Departments in specific situations where safety is an issue. • Chapter 18.85.030 provides for the Director of Public Works to enforce and inspect work done to maintain City street trees in healthy condition, or remove trees from the public right-of-way as necessary. • Chapter 10.95.030 provides for a Tree Board, made up of Edmonds City residents in order to encourage civic engagement for active stewardship of the urban forest. The powers and duties of the Tree Board are to advise and make recommendations to the Mayor and City Council as appropriate on tree related matters. Street and Public Trees The City of Edmonds is ultimately responsible for the planting and maintenance of public trees. These trees are on public property parcels or select locations in the rights -of -way. Other planting strips are the responsibility of adjacent land owners: • Chapter 9.20.060, for sidewalk construction and maintenance, declares that the responsibility is with the abutting property owner for maintaining or repairing adjacent planting strips. This includes all tree care. • Chapter 18.85 provides further clarity on the regulation of street trees and trees on public property. All street trees are managed by the Public Works Department and require permits for all persons who wish to plant, remove, prune or otherwise change a tree on a street, right-of-way, parking strip, planting strip, or other public place. This code chapter also includes language defining abuse and damage to street trees. Tree Related Fees and Penalties To facilitate compliance and remediation for disregarding public tree codes, the City provides penalties as a punitive deterrent: • Chapter 18.45.070 defines the punitive discretion for trees that are damaged from disregard of City code of up to $1,000 for trees less than 3" and $3,000 for trees larger than 3". Fines can be tripled related to trees in critical areas, buffers, or areas dedicated to public use, including public right-of-way. a What Do We Have? 38 Packet Pg. 290 8.1.a Private Land Clearing Land clearing on private property is often a critical challenge to effectively reaching urban forestry canopy goals. Individual private property rights and objectives of private landowners can frequently be at odds with the community aspirations for the urban forest. • Chapter 18.45 contains regulations associated with trees on private properties for land clearing and tree cutting. This code provides for a variety of purposes that would preserve the physical and aesthetic character of the City and prevent indiscriminate removal or destruction of trees. This chapter also implements policies of the State Environmental Policy Act. It provides special exemptions in 18.45.030 for improved single-family lots, partially improved single-family lots or certain unimproved lots, allowing private property owners in these categories to maintain or remove trees at their discretion without permits. Additionally, these land clearing codes provide exemptions for utility vegetation maintenance or tree work by City departments when situations involving danger to life or property are found. Tree Protection During Construction As new construction occurs throughout the Pacific Northwest, many projects can damage or kill trees. Regulations to protect trees during construction are a mechanism to control canopy loss as sites are developed. • Chapter 18.45 requires that trees that are being retained during a land development project are also protected. The codes describe the protected area on a site as being within the drip -line of the tree and attempts to limit damage to trees by controlling the impact to trees within this area. Critical Areas and Buffers Washington State has special laws to protect critical areas, which are defined for certain types of valuable and environmentally significant areas. Chapter 23.40 establishes extra protections and management requirements for trees located near wetlands, streams, or steep slopes. Tree pruning or removal is restricted or prohibited without a report from an ISA certified arborist, ASCA registered consultant, or a registered landscape architect that documents the hazard and provides a replanting schedule for replacement trees. Challenges One of the more frequent complaints related to tree removal in the city is when properties are developed or subdivided. While a goal of the City's code is that "trees should be retained to the maximum extent feasible," other applicable development regulations help determine what is feasible. There are regulations that prescribe how wide driveways and roads must be, how far the development must be from the edges of a property, location of utilities (water, sewer, gas, and power) that must be installed underground, and stormwater requirements that require the installation of stormwater facilities. As a result, when one of the larger properties in the City that contains a grove of trees is developed to meet the many regulations and needs, sometimes only a few trees are located outside of the development footprint. Trees that were once stable in their grove, are susceptible to wind throw and become hazardous when isolated on their own. Where a tree was once the right tree in the right location (one tree protected in a larger grove), it may no longer be the right tree in the right location (an exposed tree on the perimeter of a lot) following development. As the City considers updates to the development code, updates should provide more ways to encourage greater tree retention when properties are developed. An example may be to provide options for reduced interior setbacks that would allow houses to be clustered and thus provide an opportunity to avoid trees where otherwise development would be placed under the regulations in effect as of early 2019. Another example of an update to consider may include evaluating the required width of access easements. 39 what Do We Have? Packet Pg. 291 Table 8: Summary of Current City of Edmonds Tree Cutting Regulations 8.1.a 0 a U 7 a - Developed single-family property, no critical areas present Developed single-family property, critical areas present Removal of hazard trees in critical area Prune or trim trees Multi -family property and Planned Residential Developments with approved landscape plan Commercial Property Tree removal with development Trees in right-of-way Street trees No review, no permit required Yes, review and permit required if tree in critical area or critical area buffer Review required, but no permit No review, no permit Yes, review and permit required Yes, review and permit required Yes, review included with land use or development permit. Yes, review and permit required Yes, review and permit required Prune or removal of park I No permit trees No notification required, but suggested to avoid unnecessary Code Enforcement Response Tree cutting permit Type II decision (staff decision with notice) Documentation of hazard tree by certified arborist, or clear documentation of dead tree. Replanting required at 2:1 ratio Topping considered same as tree cutting or removal unless retopping of a previously approved topping Design review against landscaping requirements. Type I decision (staff decision, no notice) Design review against landscaping requirements. Type I decision (staff decision no notice) Tree protection measures required for trees to remain A right-of-way construction permit is required for any party other than the City of Edmonds to perform any removal or trimming of trees located within the City rights -of -way Design review against landscaping requirements. Type I decision (staff decision, no notice) The City's Parks Department maintains trees within the City's parks. While no permit is required, tree removal and replacement must be consistent with the Citv's critical area regulations What Do We Have? 40 Packet Pg. 292 8.1.a Regional Urban Forestry Resources Regional urban forestry resources are organizations that provide services to aid in the protection, maintenance, and development of the urban forest. These range from active volunteer groups in the City, to nonprofits, academic institutions, and state and federal government agencies. Some of the organizations and programs described below have been used by the City. Others may be good choices for the future. Edmonds' community volunteers helping to remove ivy and improve forest health. WFOM WASHINGTON COMMUNITY �� Washington State Urban and Community Forestry Program Under the Washington State Department of Natural Resources (DNR), the Washington State Urban and Community Forestry (UCF) Program provides technical, educational, and financial assistance to Washington's cities and towns, counties, tribal governments, nonprofit organizations, and educational institutions. The mission of the UCF is: "To provide leadership to create self-sustaining urban and community forestry programs that preserve, plant and manage forests and trees for public benefits and quality of life." A key service provided by the UCF is its collection of financial assistance programs including; Community Forestry Assistance Grants, Tree City USA Tree Planting & Maintenance Grants, Arbor Day Tree Reimbursements, Landscape Scale Restoration Grants, Scholarships, and Internships. All forms of financial assistance, their availability in a given year, and their associated dollar amounts are dependent on continued funding through annual grant allocations from the USDA Forest Service. The UCF communicates events, educational opportunities, and other information through a Tree Link Newsletter. The Washington Community Forestry Council advises the DNR on policies and programs. The program does this by teaching citizens and decision - makers about the economic, environmental, psychological, and aesthetic benefits of trees. The program also helps local governments, citizen groups, and volunteers plant and sustain healthy trees throughout Washington. The council was established under RCW 76.15. 41 what Do We Have? Packet Pg. 293 8.1.a i FORT&RRA FOR THE PEOPLE. FOR THE LEWD. FOREVER. FORTERRA Green City Partnerships The Green City program helps urban communities in the Puget Sound region effectively steward their natural open spaces through best practices. FORTERRA partners with local municipalities to develop achievable goals, shared visions, long-term plans, and community -based stewardship programs to care for the valuable forests and natural areas in our urban environments. Specific services include: • City-wide forested park and natural area assessment • Strategic and restoration planning • Volunteer program development and guidance • Education and training for volunteers • Restoration tracking systems • Green City outreach and community engagement • On- the -ground stewardship projects and event support The Green City Partnerships share three (3) core goals: • Improve the quality of life, connections to nature, and enhance forest benefits in cities by restoring our forested parks and natural areas • Galvanize an informed and active community • Ensure long-term sustainable funding and community support These unique public/private partnerships bring together public, private, and nonprofit stakeholders to create a sustainable network of healthy forested parks and natural areas throughout the region. Municipal Research and Services Center The Municipal Research and Services Center (MRSC) is a nonprofit organization that helps local governments across Washington State better serve their citizens by providing legal and policy guidance on any topic. The MRSC collects state and local information from parks and recreation departments, land use planners, utilities, and citizen organizations to promote and manage urban forestry resources. Example resources include local urban forestry programs in Washington State, legal references, and related articles. A deodar cedar provides shade for parked cars. c a c a� E a� �a c M 0 a_ c M w L T M I 0 rn I 0 N d u_ Q c 0 E w c as E z U 0 r a What Do We Have? 42 Packet Pg. 294 8.1.a future wise � Futurewise Futurewise is a nonprofit that has worked to prevent sprawl to protect the resources of communities in Washington State. Futurewise was founded to help support implementation of Washington State's Growth Management Act, and to focus on preventing the conversion of wildlife habitat, open space, farmland, and working forests to subdivisions and development. Futurewise provides data analysis and research, community and environmental planning and policy development, community engagement and outreach, grassroots organizing and advocacy, legislative initiatives, and litigation. These services are all provided through strategic collaboration with businesses, governments, community organizations, and nonprofit partners. Wetland stream flowing through Edmonds. w COLLEGE of the ENVIRONMENT The University of Washington Restoration Ecology Network TThe UW-Restoration Ecology Network (UW-REN) is a tri-campus program, serving as a regional center to integrate student, faculty and community interests in ecological restoration and conservation. Students in the program are required to complete capstone projects, where students of different academic backgrounds work together to complete a local restoration project. Students learn how to plan, design, install, and monitor a restoration project while working in teams. The Capstone spans three academic quarters beginning in the fall. Communities collaborate with the program to develop RFPs, which then provide volunteers for the community and excellent learning experiences for the students. %AF .: 43 what Do we Have? Packet Pg. 295 8.1.a EarthCorps EarthCorps is a human capital development program where corps members learn leadership skills by working collaboratively, leading community volunteers, and executing technical restoration projects along shorelines, trails, and in forests. Puget Sound Stewards help EarthCorps run restoration events, monitor plant growth, adapt management plans, and educate the community. EarthCorps collaborates with businesses, nonprofits, and communities to offer volunteers who are passionate about conservation and restoration. The Puget Sound Stewards program in Edmonds was created by EarthCorps in 2015 in partnership with the City of Edmonds with support from the Hazel Miller Foundation. The goal was to provide on- Forested park canopy in Edmonds. Forested park canopy in Edmonds. going, locally -based, expert care for one of the City's key natural areas. Starting with Edmonds Marsh, a wildlife sanctuary and rare example of a saltwater marsh in the midst of a city, the program has grown to include three more sites: Brackett's Landing, Willow Creek Demonstration Garden, and Hutt Park. The volunteers who join the Puget Sound Steward program are supported by EarthCorps staff and crews as they learn about the ecology of Puget Sound and how to perform actions that improve the ecological health of project sites in Edmonds that contribute to the health of Puget Sound and Edmonds residents. Actions include removing invasive weeds such as Himalayan Blackberry or English Ivy, mulching areas in need of water retention and weed suppression, and replanting with native plants to foster greater biodiversity. c �a a c a� E aD a� c a� L 0 U_ c D 0 M I to 0 I Cn r 0 N a Q c 0 E w c aD E t 0 r Q What Do We Have? 44 Packet Pg. 296 8.1.a Urban Forestry Practices: Case Studies In order to remain progressive with its urban forestry programs, the City of Edmonds recognizes that there are urban forestry practices emerging from other municipalities that could eventually add value if developed within the City. Through stakeholder interviews and discussions with City Staff, three urban forestry practices were selected as important for further consideration in implementation of this UFMP: Tree Banks (orfee in -Lieu programs), Heritage Tree Programs and Arborist Business Licensing. This section explores some examples around how other cities have adopted these programs. Tree Banks - Fee -based alternatives to tree replacement Often in the course of urban forest management, there can be logistical challenges associated with replacing trees at the same site where trees are removed. An increasingly common solution is to provide developers and residents with the opportunity to pay fees in -lieu of meeting their landscaping requirements. Providing a fee orfinancial guarantee option creates a system for funding tree planting projects or even more sophisticated landscape restoration projects that improve the overall health and condition of the urban forest. Precedence for this option can be found at the National level, with the U.S. Army Corp of Engineers. In a Federal Rule published in April 2008, The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (the Corps) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) define an in - lieu fee program as: • "A program involving the restoration, establishment, enhancement, and/or preservation of aquatic resources through funds paid to a governmental or non-profit natural resources management entity to satisfy compensatory mitigation requirements... Similar to a mitigation bank, an in -lieu fee program sells compensatory mitigation credits to permittees whose obligation to provide compensatory mitigation is then transferred to the in -lieu program sponsor." Snohomish County Here, the government provides options for permit applicants to engage the county, their own contractor, or do the mitigation work themselves to ensure that mitigation is achieved, even when it is not possible at the proposed project site: • 'Applicants may choose to perform the off - site mitigation work on private property either themselves or through their own contractor, subject to all other provisions of Section 30.62 SCC, or applicants may enter into a voluntary mitigation agreement with the County pursuant to RCW 82.02.020 under which the County will perform the mitigation work on public property within the same sub -drainage basin or watershed resource inventory area (WRIA)." (POL-6210 REQUIREMENTS FOR PROVIDING OFF -SITE MITIGATION FOR IMPACTS TO CRITICAL AREAS ARISING OUT OF SINGLE- FAMILY RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION UNDER SCC 30.62.330) The following cities are examples of fee in -lieu programs related to urban forestry. There is some variation in how these fees are calculated, as well as where the funds collected get administered. City of Redmond The City of Redmond calculates fee in -lieu to include the cost of the trees. More importantly, the fee also includes all costs associated with establishment care. From Article IV Environmental Regulations: • RMC 21.72.080 E.2. - Tree Replacement Fee A fee in- lieu of tree replacement may be allowed, subject to approval by the Administrator after careful consideration of all other options. A tree replacement fee shall be required for each replacement tree required but not planted on the application site or an offsite location. i. The amount of the fee shall be the tree base fee times the number of trees necessary to satisfy the tree replacement requirements 45 What Do We Have? Packet Pg. 297 8.1.a of this section. The tree base fee shall cover the cost of a tree, installation (labor and equipment), maintenance for two years, and fund administration. The fee shall be paid to the City prior to the issuance of a tree removal Permit. Fees collected under this subsection shall be expended only for the planting of new trees in City -owned parks, open spaces or rights - of -way. • http://online.encodeplus.com/regs/redmond- wa/export2doc.aspx?pdf=1&tocid=005.009&fil e=doc-005.009-pid-80.pdf City of Renton The City of Renton has much more limited code language. Fee in -lieu options are still at the City's Community volunteers pulling weeds and improving forest health in Edmonds. discretion, but only cover the cost of the tree and installation. No funding for establishment care is required in this code. However, the code does directly designate the funds to be allocated to the Urban Forestry Program fund, which provides more discretion to the City with how the funds get allocated: • RMC 4-4-130 H.1.E iii. Fee in Lieu: When the Administrator determines that it is infeasible to replace trees on the site, payment into the City's Urban Forestry Program fund may be approved in an amount of money approximating the current market value of the replacement trees and the labor to install them. The City shall determine the value of replacement trees. http://www.codepublishing com/WA/Renton/#!/Renton04/RentonO4O4/ Renton0404130.html What Do We Have? 46 Packet Pg. 298 City of Port Angeles 8.1.a City of Seattle The City of Port Angeles provides a fee in -lieu option, but it only appears to relate to street tree replacement requirements. Another distinction in this code is the fee is determined by the Community Forester (a city staff position): • PAMC 11.13.050 B.3. Street tree requirements in previously developed area. In addition to the above requirements, the following also apply: Where new street trees cannot be planted due to portions of rights -of -way having been previously paved or otherwise rendered unsuitable to plant trees, a fee -in -lieu of planting is required. Such fee shall be determined by the Community Forester per City Policy and deposited into the Community Forestry Fund. https://library.municode.com/wa/port_angeles/ codes/code_of ordinances?nodeld=TIT11STSl_ CH 11.13STTR_11.13.050STTREN RE Heritage Tree Programs - Recognizing Historical Significance of Trees In many cities around the nation, trees are often recognized for their historical significance to the community. This recognition is commonly referred to as part of a Heritage Tree Program. These programs provide communities with a way of officially recognizing trees, and with the recognition, can offer a variety of benefits to the community, including: • Increasing public awareness of trees and the urban forest • Drawing attention to and protecting unique and significant trees • Reinforcing how trees are a key component of a city's character and sense of place • Engaging citizens with the purpose and activities of a city's urban forestry program • Encouraging public participation in the identification and perpetuation of heritage trees throughout the City In the greater Puget Sound region, a number of cities have heritage tree programs. One of the earliest programs was for the City of Seattle in 1996 when PlantAmnesty (a nonprofit) initiated a program that eventually became co -sponsored by the City. Seattle's program provides the broadest set of categories for designating a tree as a heritage tree. Trees can be designated according to the following categories: • Specimen: A tree of exceptional size, form, or rarity. • Historic: A tree recognized by virtue of its age, its association with or contribution to a historic structure or district, or its association with a noted person or historic event. • Landmark: Trees that are landmarks of a community. • Collection: Trees in a notable grove, avenue, or other planting. City of Vancouver The City of Vancouver, Washington, has had a heritage tree program in place since 1998. Unlike Seattle, which already regulates the care of exceptional trees (including heritage trees) on private property, the City of Vancouver uses this designation to protect trees on private properties where tree removal permits would not ordinarily be required. This is a voluntary program for private property owners, thus protecting the rights of the property owner (https://www.cityofvancouver.us/ publicworks/page/heritage-trees). City of Lynnwood Closer to Edmonds, in the neighboring City of Lynnwood, the Heritage Tree program is defined in municipal code. Although many aspects of this program are similarto other cities, their specific code language binds all successive owners of the tree to the protection obligations within this designation. This language has the added benefit of ensuring long-term protection and care for the tree unless it is determined to be a hazard (LMC 17.5.070). 47 What Do We Have? Packet Pg. 299 Arborist Business Licenses - 8.1.a City of Lincoln Ensuring Best Practices in Tree Care Businesses that operate in Edmonds only require a general business license to work as an arborist. This is not uncommon, but many cities are now recognizing how the complexity of city codes associated with tree care and the expectations of the community necessitate special licensing for businesses that perform tree work. Tree care industry professionals and researchers in the science of arboriculture routinely convene as the International Society of Arboriculture (ISA), or the Tree Care Industry Association (TCIA). These groups collaborate to encourage best practices in tree care and tree worker safety. To help ensure a community has companies that are adequately trained and qualified for tree work, the use of arborist licensing that ties the business with these organizations is increasingly popular. The following cities were selected from throughout the U.S. as examples of different approaches for arborist business licensing: City of Herrington • Herrington, KY — Businesses that practice arboriculture must submit an application to the City for a Tree Contractor license. The application identifies the business as practicing arboriculture and requires proof of sufficient insurance (http://www.cityofherington.com/ pview.aspx?id=32514&catl D=547). Jim Community engagement on urban forestry is important to encourage tree retention on private properties. • Lincoln, NE — In Lincoln, applications for tree services and arborists not only require proof of insurance, but also proof of ISA credentials or a tree worker test administered by the parks and recreation department. http://Iincoln.ne.gov/ city/parks/communityforestry/arborist.htm City of Denver • Denver, CO — Denver has two classes for their "Tree Service License." This is a distinct feature of their licensing process. Licenses can be issued to businesses working on "Large Trees," which require workers to leave the ground, or an "Ornamental" license, designed for companies doing landscaping work on small trees that do not require an aerial lift. https:H www.denvergov.org/content/dam/denvergov/ Portals/747/documents/forestry/tree-license- info-packet.pdf City of Spokane • Spokane, WA — Spokane has a commercial tree license that businesses must secure if they are doing work on public property trees (e.g.,street trees and park trees). https://my.spokanecity. org/urbanforestry/permits/ What Do We Have? 48 Packet Pg. 300 8.1.a Incentives - Encouraging Tree Retention on Private Properties From the urban tree canopy assessment, it was determined that the majority of tree canopy in the city is privately owned and managed. For cities to manage their urban forests, collaboration and voluntary commitments on the part of private property owners can be a beneficial strategy that encourages desirable tree care and retention practices. (Note: In some "incentive programs," cities have first established by code minimum tree density requirements for private properties and then used incentives to allow property owners some flexibility in retaining the minimum tree density). The following are example methods that cities, counties, and states have used to incentivize desirable tree stewardship on private property: City of Portland Portland, OR — The City of Portland has a "Treebate" program which provides a one-time credit on individual utility bills for planting a tree in a residential yard. The amount of credit depends on the size of the tree. (Certain types of trees are excluded from the program.) https://www.portlandoregon.gov/bes/ article/314187 Brevard County • Brevard County, FL— In Brevard County, incentives were created to encourage tree preservation as they relate to landscaping requirements during development. This code language incentivizes by providing credits for exceeding tree canopy density, preserving native trees of significant size, or vegetation of special concern. These credits reduce the tree re -planting requirements otherwise associated with development projects. (Code Sec 62-4344). http://brevardcounty.elaws.us/code/coor_ptii_ appid32777_ch62_artxiii_div2_sec62-4344 City of Rocklin • Rocklin, CA — In an effort to preserve its native oak population, the City of Rocklin established incentives in their code. Projects that save 25% or more of the surveyed oak trees receive expedited processing by the Community Development department. In addition, development projects can have traffic mitigation and capital facility fees deferred from 3 months up to 12 months depending on the trees being saved. http://www.rocklin.ca.us/ sites/main/files/file-attachments/oak_tree_ preservation_guidelines.pdf State of Hawaii State of Hawaii — In an effort to encourage the care and maintenance of trees determined as "exceptional", residents can deduct up to $3000 per tax year for their costs associated with tree care. The code language has an additional limitation that this tax deduction can only be allowed once every three years. (HRS 235-19). http://files.hawaii.gov/tax/legal/hrs/hrs_235.pdf When the City of Edmonds updates its development regulations, incentives for tree retention and tree planting should be considered. These may include: Tree bank Tree bank funded by development. Developer pays X dollar for each significant tree removed during development into a tree bank. This "incentivizes" tree retention because the developer may find ways to maintain trees rather than pay into the tree bank. • Tree bank could be used to supply property owners with certificates to purchase trees to plant on their property. Tree bank funds could be used towards purchase of forested properties when they become available. 49 What Do We Have? Packet Pg. 301 8.1.a Development flexibility to maintain trees • Allowing reduced interior setbacks may allow more flexibility in home placement and provide opportunities for tree retention. • Allow for deviations from access and road width requirements to allow more flexibility in design and home placements. • Encourage low impact development techniques which promote tree retention. Heritage Tree Program • Develop a voluntary Heritage Tree Program to recognize unique or special trees as a way to recognize stewardship of the urban forest by local property owners. Further consideration of the above —and any additional —ideas should be explored in more detail as part of the code update process in the near future. Summary Considerations for Urban Forest Practices Historical practices and regulatory requirements provide a clear vision and mandate that direct the City to manage the entire urban forest. In particular, the City has special authority over property it owns or that is within the public right-of-way. Yet, no comprehensive public tree inventory exists. The City also does not have a dedicated forestry specialist to direct the City's urban forest management activities. Instead, the City has multiple departments that are guided by codes and policies for site -specific decisions without overarching strategic level guidance of the forest. An example encountered by public works staff is when a tree removal is being considered. One tree may need to be removed and replaced for safety reasons, but additional trees may get removed and replaced to maintain the aesthetic of the streetscape. Without overarching urban forest strategies, removals of trees for simple rights -of -way improvements can be seen as reactive solutions resolved through political discourse instead of planned practical decisions for city managers. This reactive approach to urban forest management also extends to the tree care budget. The City does not maintain sufficient tree related information (such as tree quantity or condition data) to budget for proactive tree care. Current urban forestry benefits models show how trees in Edmonds provide environmental and economic benefits that are much greater than their reactive management costs. There is tremendous opportunity to leverage this disparity and direct forest management toward proactive tactics such as tree planting, young tree maintenance pruning, and tree inspections. With approximately 13%ofthe City's entire tree canopy in public ownership, other methods to encourage or require tree planting/protection will be needed for the community to have influence over tree care in the remaining 87% of the forest. Some strategies that have been engaged in at other municipalities include the fee in -lieu programs to support variances in any tree replacement obligations, Heritage Tree Programs that protect special trees, and arborist business licensing to encourage best practices in tree care, and incentive programs. The City's policies with regard to the acquisition of open space (including the potential purchase of forested properties) are contained with the Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan. Land acquisition is included in the capital project budget and the PROS plan notes that "expansions of the parks system will target the gaps identified in this plan and take advantage of opportunities as they emerge. Due to the constrained nature of Edmonds, this approach will require vigilance and proactive pursuit of potential land acquisition opportunities for both parks and open spaces. The City's inclusion of this item in the capital projects list recognizes the importance of swift action when rare property acquisition opportunities become available." A specific policy addressing the purchase of forested properties could be considered for adding to the PROS plan to recognize the potential of maintaining the City's tree cover through the selective purchase of forest properties as opportunities arise. Finally, the City of Edmonds has both public and nonprofit agencies committed to helping Edmonds maintain a healthy urban forest. With continued and greater engagement, the City may realize more grant -funded opportunities, volunteer resources, and engaged citizens who will help the City achieve its urban forest management goals. c a c as E a) �a c M U) 4) 0 U_ c M w 0 MI 0 I o� 0 N a U) c 0 E w c as E M U 0 r a What Do We Have? 50 Packet Pg. 302 8.1.a What Do We Want? Stakeholder and Community Input Edmonds conducted substantial outreach to public stakeholders, residents, and nonprofit agency stakeholders. Connections and relationships that develop among stakeholders are valuable outcomes of the urban forest outreach process. This provided a wide context for the challenges that face Edmonds' urban forest. As community awareness and actions associated with urban forestry move forward, it will be the people of Edmonds that ultimately realize the value of their contributions to their community in the trees that grow around them. Stakeholder Interviews In the summer of 2017, a team from the Davey Resource Group and Nature Insight Consulting met with several municipal and regional urban forest stakeholders. These stakeholder interviews occurred over two days and included urban planners, utility experts, public works staff, tree board representatives, and City staff leadership. Their valuable contributions guided the framework of the UFMP. Virtual Open House Throughout the development process, the City hosted a website that provided community access to the planning process. In addition, the website provided access to videos of public presentations, surveys, and invitations for public comments. This approach provided further opportunities for public input outside of scheduled community meetings. Community Meetings The first public meeting was held with the City of Edmonds Citizens' Tree Board on May 4, 2017. During this meeting, issues, concerns, and values about the urban forest were explored with members and visitors in attendance. Later, on June 22, 2017, the City of Edmonds hosted the first of two open houses (Appendix D) at City Hall to share information about the UFMP development process and gather input from community residents. The open house included a presentation and a brief discussion with the audience to answer clarifying questions. Following the presentation, attendees were invited to provide input (thoughts, ideas, concerns, questions) on six opinion poster boards. Each poster board contained a broad topic followed by initial suggestions generated through the prior stakeholder interview process. Attendees were invited to express their opinions using dots (where green = a positive "vote"/ agreement for the suggestion, yellow = concern/ hesitation of the suggestion, and red = a negative "vote"/disagreement or dislike of the suggestion). Attendees were invited to use as many dots of each color as necessary to express their opinion of each suggestion on each poster board. In addition, each poster board provided an area for Additional Suggestions, where attendees were invited to write down their thoughts, ideas, concerns, and questions on a sticky note. The sticky note was then adhered to the poster board for other attendees to review and "vote" on. A third meeting which was with the Planning Board, occurred on July 26, 2017 as another opportunity to solicit public participation early in the UFMP development process. The results of these public meetings helped the City to understand the needs and concerns of the community and guide the development of the online survey. 51 what Do we want? Packet Pg. 303 — �AN " M•�vr .[Ira iihLu�[ I: spa rd[x[I 1 Afff i��l r _ � rSF �. Al r 8.1.a Online Community Survey As part of the initial stakeholder outreach, a survey was developed with the intention of understanding and benchmarking Edmonds' community values and views on the urban forest. It was not conducted as a statistically valid study but as one to guage community values and get public feedback. Survey data was collected online. The survey platform only allowed one survey response per household to control for multiple entries from a single respondent. The survey closed in September of 2017 with 175 responses having been gathered through the summer (Appendix C). Responses increased following the public open house and a presentation to the planning board. Although the intent was to gather feedback from a broad representation of the community, 40.9% of the respondents affiliated themselves with the Edmonds Bowl area, with another 15.2% affiliating with the Seaview neighborhood. Other neighborhoods had less than fifteen (15) responses each, about 29.3% of the combined total. 14.6% (24 responses) did not affiliate within the survey -defined neighborhood groups. The results showed how seventy-five percent (74.9%) of respondents "strongly agree" that public trees are important to the quality of life in Edmonds. Sixty-seven percent (66.9%) of respondents "agree" or "strongly agree" that Edmonds needs more public 40 % 35% 30% 25 % 20 % 15% 10% Edmonds' fountain and traffic circle trees. trees. The most popular location for more trees is in open space and natural areas (60.4%), followed by parks (59.2%), streetscapes (59.2%), then trails and bike paths (45.6%), downtown (42.6%), and golf courses (11.2%). When asked to rank the environmental benefits most valued from the urban forest, respondents expressed the greatest appreciation for air quality benefits, with 36.6% indicating that it is the most important benefit, followed by wildlife habitat, and water quality. Energy savings were ranked as least important at 4.6% (Figure 4). Figure 5: Most Valuable Environmental Benefit 0% 0/ Improved Air Quality Wildlife Habitat Protect Water Carbon Storage Energy Savings Other Quality/Reduced Stormwater Runoff Environmental Benefits 53 what Do We want? Packet Pg. 305 8.1.a View of street trees at 5th Avenue South and Main Street. On average, respondents ranked the beauty of trees as the most important intangible benefit, followed by shaded trails, sidewalks, and bike trails, then 40 35 30 25 20 15% 10% attractiveness to residents. The benefit of shaded parking was ranked as the least important aesthetic benefit (Figure 5). Figure 6: Most Valuable Intangible Benefit 50 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ 0/o Beauty/Aesthetics Shaded Attractive to Shaded Improve retail Increased Property Passive recreation Shaded Parkin Trails,sidewalks, Residents streets/Buffer areas and Values and bike trails from vehicles neighborhoods Intangible Benefits c �a a r c 0 E a� R c a� L 0 LL L r L T c'M CD 0 I Cn 0 N a Q c 0 E w c aD E t r Q What Do We Want? Packet Pg. 306 8.1.a In general, respondents are satisfied with the current level of maintenance, with 69.8% saying they "Agree" or "Strongly Agree." When asked to rank various options for the level of maintenance that public trees should receive, 52.1% of respondents indicated their preferred expectation is for trees to receive hazard maintenance (Figure 6). Fifty-four percent (53.9%) of respondents would like to seethe City help preserve trees on private property. Education and outreach were considered the best ways to encourage tree planting and preservation on private property, with 79.0% of respondents identifying these as their preferred methods. Respondents were asked to select the types of education and public outreach they would like to see offered by the urban forestry program. The most popular educational materials were website resources (62.7%), followed by interpretive trails and displays (59.8%), guided nature and tree walks (55.0%), and informational brochures (43.2%). 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Take care of hazardous trees. Street tree along Main Street. Figure 7: Maintenance Expectations Holistic Plant Health Care (Improve the urban forest, but not necessarily every tree) Best possible care (all trees Clearance only (keep the None -Keep them natural should look good) sidewalks and streets clear) Maintenance Expectations 55 What Do We Want? Packet Pg. 307 8.1.a Summary Considerations for Public Outreach Already considered a valuable asset by Edmonds residents, Edmonds has an opportunity to further improve the urban forest through increased public outreach and community engagement. Public engagement on urban forestry issues has demonstrated that the public is generally satisfied with the City's activities on public property, but prefers to have the City only provide guidance and education as opposed to regulation when it comes to stewardship of trees on private property. There is general agreement from survey respondents that trees impact views for many residents, and the issue galvanizes residents as a primary tree issue in Edmonds. In fact, views of the water and other scenic places are fundamental to Edmonds' identity as a community. Scenic views are also considered a property right of long-established development. At the same time, appreciation of trees —especially "the right trees in the right place" —is a value shared by almost everyone. Private property trees have canopy that can shade public streets. Street trees along 5th Avenue. c a. c as �a c M U) W 0 LL c M L D w M m I 0 Os I 0 N a. Q U) c 0 E w c m E M U 0 r Q What Do We want? 56 Packet Pg. 308 8.1.a How Do We Get There? Over the next twenty (20) years, the City of Edmonds will be able to enhance management of the urban forest through implementation of actions recommended in this Plan. The decision to develop a Plan with a 2038-time horizon was primarily based on the precedence established by the City with other long-range planning documents. Additionally, growing and improving Edmonds' urban forest are slow processes. Tree physiology for most trees in Western Washington can take up to seven (7) years to establish after planting, and anotherten (10) years before they reach functional maturity. Trees provide the majority of their ecosystem services when they reach functional maturity. For this additional reason, it is essential that urban forest planning consider at least twenty (20) years within the Plan framework as a reasonable expectation for achieving the desired state of the urban forest. The five (5) long-range strategic goals provided in this Plan will guide actions and activities that address the three components of a sustainable urban forestry program: • Urban Forest Asset Actions, which are intended to improve the urban forest resource over the next twenty (20) years by developing detailed expectations for the urban forest. To accomplish this, most activities will increase the amount of information the City maintains about its urban forest resource. This includes activities like routine tree canopy assessments and a public tree inventory, both of which are fundamental to management and are substantial expenses to an urban forestry program requiring significant consideration. • Municipal Resource Actions, which are intended to drive improvements in City policy and practices by developing efficiency and alignment of efforts within City departments. The common activities for accomplishing these goals center around developing policies that promote routine tree inspection and formalized tree management strategies for City -owned trees. The results will encourage the City to improve its awareness and mitigation of tree hazards and eliminate barriers to effective urban forest management. • Community Resource Actions, which are intended to build stronger community engagement and public participation in urban forest stewardship. The activities coordinate with the public and encourage the participation of citizens and businesses to align with the City's vision for the urban forest. The research into current and historical efforts in urban forestry at the City has revealed numerous opportunities for Edmonds to enhance the understanding of the urban forest resource as well as improve efficiency in tree maintenance operations. The criteria and indicators proposed by Kenney, et al. (2011) were used as a standard to assess the current urban forestry practices in the City, and provide the management reference necessary to frame the following recommended goals for this plan. Each action contains time designations which estimate the anticipated timeframe for completion of the action/activity once it is started. 57 How Do We Get There? Packet Pg. 309 8.1.a Scenic views of the Puget Sound from Edmonds. Trees can obstruct the view, but can also be the view. r.. How Do We Get There? 58 Packet Pg. 310 Urban Forest Management Plan Goals Goad 1 Time Goal 1- Maintain or enhance citywide canopy coverage The city has limited information about the condition of the urban forest. Success with this objective will be achieved with enhanced management of public trees and a deeper understanding of the population of trees on private property. The following actions will support this objective: A. Update tree regulations to reduce clearcutting or other development On -going impacts on the urban forest and to consider changes to tree replacement requirements and penalties for code violations B. Adopt policy goal of no net loss to overall tree canopy and continue to 1 Year enhance canopy in parks according to the PROS plan. C. Ensure protection of tree resources in environmentally critical areas On -going D. Develop a voluntary heritage tree program 3-5 Years E. Enforce city regulations on tree cutting On -going i. Reach out periodically to tree maintenance and landscaping firms to make sure they know Edmonds' requirements for pruning or removing trees F. Establish a tree bank or fund to which donations can be made for tree 3-5 Years planting and other tree programs i. Use any penalty fees from tree cutting violations to fund tree programs G. Support sustainable ways to combat pests and disease that threaten trees On -going H. Consider need for dedicated City arborist On -going I. Report at least every 10 years on canopy coverage 10 Years, On -going J. Periodically review and, if needed, update Urban Forest Management Plan 5-10 Years, On -going (generally, every 5-10 years) 59 How Do We Get There? Packet Pg. 311 Urban Forest Management Plan Goals Goal 2 Time Goal 2 - Manage public trees proactively The city has identified opportunities within this plan to improve its risk management associated with trees and create better pathways for community engagement. The following actions will support this objective: A. Use best available science in caring for the urban forest on City properties On -going and ROW B. Have adequate resources (staff, contractual help, training, or other) to On -going monitor the health of public trees and make decisions on their care C. Develop and maintain an inventory of trees in key public places (for example, On -going along certain City streets or trails) to document tree condition and risk D. Update the Street Tree Plan periodically 5-10 Years, On -going E. Support removal of invasive plants, such as ivy, where they threaten the On -going health of public trees F. Coordinate among departments on tree issues and identify lead City staff On -going person to guide approach and activities G. Develop and implement a tree planting plan on City property and ROW to 3-5 Years, On -going help ensure: i. Age and species diversity; ii. And suitability of species to location H. Implement a program of regular maintenance and pruning for City trees, 3-5 Years, On -going consistent with best management practices I. Lead or facilitate volunteer activities for tree planting/care on City property 1 Year, On -going and rights -of way J. As part of City -sponsored capital projects, provide funding for appropriate On -going trees in rights -of -way and on City properties K. Provide an annual report to the City Council on tree planting/management On -going for City properties and right-of-way (ROW) How Do We Get There? 60 Packet Pg. 312 Urban Forest Management Plan Goal 3 Goal 3 - Incentivize protecting & planting trees on private property To ensure success with enhancing the tree canopy, the city recognizes that voluntary public participation must be encouraged. The following actions will support this objective. Goals J Time A. Have a program of giving away trees and/or tree vouchers for use in Edmonds 3-5 Years, On -going B. For properties that retain a certain amount of tree canopy cover, explore establishment of: i. A property tax "rebate" applicable to the City portion of property taxes; and/or ii. A stormwater utility fee reduction; and/or iii. Other techniques that provide a financial recognition of the benefits of tree planting and protection. C. Develop a certification/awards program to publicly recognize property owners that maintain a certain amount or type of healthy trees 3-5 Years, On -going 1 Year, On -going 61 How Do We Get There? Packet Pg. 313 Urban Forest Management Plan Goal s Goal 4 Goal 4 - Provide resources to the community to educate/inform on tree planting and care The city recognizes the importance of the privately managed tree population in the city and recognizes the opportunity to support community stewardship. The following actions will support this objective: A. Provide signage or other information about significant public trees B. Provide for Tree Board, especially to: i. Develop community education materials; ii. Participate in or initiate tree planting and tree care activities, including outreach to citizen volunteers Time 1 Year 1 Year, On -going iii. Report annually to the City Council on Tree Board activities C. Develop and disseminate information for the public on the value of trees 1 Year, On -going and to provide guidance on tree selection and management How Do We Get There? 62 Packet Pg. 314 Urban Forest Management Plan Goals Goad 5 Time Goal 5 - Promote "Right tree, right place" Ultimately, the urban forest will be sustainable when o balanced combination of long-lived native trees and nursery grown street trees ore growing in suitable spaces to maintain views, support wildlife (pollinators, birds, mammals, etc) and provide optimum environmental services. The following actions will support this objective: A. Make readily available lists of compatible trees for planting in various kinds 1 Year of local settings i. Indentify: large native tree species that can spread out in large spaces; low -growing trees in view corridors, trees with appropriate root systems near sidewalks and underground pipes. ii. Provide lists of suitable trees to support pollinators and backyard wildlife habitat. B. Identify key areas to increase canopy and: 1-3 Years i. For any such private properties, encourage appropriate tree planting or other techniques; and ii. for any such public properties, consider and take action to appropriately plant trees or otherwise increase canopy. C. Identify and plan for the care of unsuitable trees and, as necessary, for On -going pruning or removal when they are potentially damaging to people, buildings or infrastructure D. Ensure that development regulations require native trees and vegetation On -going to be planted in critical areas, especially near streams and other wildlife habitat areas E. In updating the Street Tree Plan, identify specific species of trees that should 1-2 Years be planted to be compatible with the street environment 63 How Do We Get There? Packet Pg. 315 8.1.a How Are We Doing? Monitoring and Measuring Results The UFMP includes goals and actions for measuring the success of planning strategies. It is intended that the Plan serves as a living document. As new information becomes available, this section of the UFMP will be reviewed and amended using routine plan updates, annual reports, and community satisfaction surveys. 5-10 Year Plan Update (Plan 2023) The UFMP is an active tool that will guide management and planning decisions over the next twenty ( 20) years. The goals and actions will be reviewed every five to ten (5 -10) years for progress and integration into an internal work plan. The UFMP presents a long-range vision and target dates are intended to be flexible in response to emerging opportunities, available resources, and changes in community expectations. Therefore, each year, specific areas of focus should be identified. This can inform budget and time requirements for Urban Forest Managers. Annual State of the Urban Forest Report This report, delivered annually, should include numbers of trees planted and removed by the City, and any changes to the overall community urban forest. It will serve as a performance report to stakeholders and an opportunity for engagement. The report is also an opportunity to highlight the successful attainment of UFMP actions as well as to inform stakeholders about any issues or stumbling blocks. This information can be integrated into urban forest managers' Annual Reports and used to pursue additional project support and funding from state agencies and Tree City USA applications. Community Satisfaction The results of the UFMP will be measurable in improvements to efficiency and reductions in costs for maintenance activities. Attainment of the goals and actions will support better tree health, greater longevity, and a reduction of tree failures. However, perhaps the greatest measurement of success for the UFMP will be its ability to meet community expectations for the care and preservation of the urban forest resource. Community satisfaction can be measured through surveys as well as by monitoring public support for realizing the goals and actions of the Plan. Community satisfaction can also be gauged by the level of engagement and support for urban forest programs. An annual survey of urban forest stakeholders will help managers ensure activities continue to be aligned with the community's vision for the urban forest. c a c m E as c N L 0 U_ c L 0 0 T M i 0 i 0 N a 2 U_ _ c 0 E w c as E r a How Are We Doing? 64 Packet Pg. 316 8.1.a Appendices Appendix A: References Akbari, H., D. Kurn, et al. 1997. Peak power and cooling energy savings of shade trees. Energy and Buildings 25:139-148. American Forests, 2007, http://www.americanforests.org Bennett, M. and Shaw, D. 2008. Diseases and Insect Pests of Pacific Madrone. Forest Health Fact Sheet EC 1619-E. California Oak Mortality Task Force, 2019. https://suddenoakdeath.org. Casey Trees and Davey Tree Expert Company. The National Tree Benefit Calculator, 2017. http://www.treebenefits.com/calculator/ CensusScope, 2012, "CensusScope: Your Portal to Census 2000 Data." www.censusscope.org Ciesla, WW.M. and Ragenovich, I.R. 2008. Forest Insect & Disease Leaflet 119. Western Tent Caterpillar. USFS. City of Edmonds, 2015, Edmonds Streetscape Plan, Department of Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services. City of Edmonds, 2016, Citizens' Tree Board. City of Edmonds, 2016, Comprehensive Plan, City of Edmonds Department of Development Services, Planning Division, Edmonds, Washington. City of Edmonds, 2016, Parks, Recreation and Open Spaces Plan, Department of Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services. City of Edmonds, 2017, Urban Tree Canopy Assessment Report, City of Edmonds Department of Development Services, Edmonds, Washington. City of Seattle, 2012, http://www.seattle.gov/parks/ProParks/ Clark, James, N. Matheny, G. Cross, V. Wake, 1997, A Model of Urban Forest Sustainability, Journal of Arboriculture 23(1): January 1997. Colorado State University Extension, 2003, Bronze Birch Borer, Image, https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/ commons/3/3d/Agri I us_a nxi us_1326203.j pg Cooley Spruce Gall Adelgid. 2015. Natural Resources Canada. Cooperative Forestry Assistance Act of 1978 (P.L. 95-313). Donovan, G and Butry D, 2010, Trees in the City: Valuing street trees in Portland, Oregon Landscape and Urban Planning. Energy Information Administration, 2003, Emissions of Greenhouse Gases in the United States 2003. http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/1605/ggrpt/ Evergreen Cities Task Force, 2009, A Guide to Community and Urban Forestry Planning, Washington State Department of Commerce. https://www.dnr.wa.gov/publications/rp_urban_guide_to_urban_ forestry_programming.pdf Faber Taylor, A. & Kuo, F.E., 2006, "Is contact with nature important for healthy child development?" State of the evidence. In Spencer, C. & Blades, M. (Eds.), Children and Their Environments: Learning, Using and Designing Spaces. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K. b: Appendices Packet Pg. 317 8.1.a Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade (FACT) Act of 1990 — P.L. 101-624. Forest Insect and Disease Leaflets, 2017 - Laminated Root Rot. USDA Forest Service https://apps.fs.usda.gov/views/laminatedrootrot Heisler, G.M., 1986, "Energy savings with trees." Journal of Arboriculture, 12, 113-25. Hartel, D, 2003, "GASB 34: Urban Natural Resources as Capital Assets", 2003 National Urban Forest Conference, Southern Center for Urban Forestry Research & Information. Hollingsworth, C.S., editor. 2019. Pacific Northwest Insect Management Handbook [online]. Corvallis, OR: a Oregon State University. http://pnwhandbooks.org/insect (accessed 31 March 2019). E i-Tree. , 2012, Tools for Assessing and Managing Community Forest. www.itreetools.org 0 Jo, H.-K. and E.G. McPherson. 1995. Carbon storage and flux in urban residential greenspace. Journal of ca M Environmental Management. 45:109-133 Kaplan, Rachel and Stephen. 1989. The Experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective. Cambridge: U) c Cambridge University Press. _ Karl, Tom., P. Harley, L. Emmons, B. Thornton, A. Guenther, C. Basu, A Turnipseed, K. Jardine. 2010, Efficient Atmospheric Cleansing of Oxidized Organic Trace Gases by Vegetation. Web 11/9/2010. http://www. w sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/330/6005/816 0 Kenny, Andy, P. van Wassenaer, A.L.Satel, 2011, Criteria and Indicators for Strategic Urban Forest Planning and v Management, Arboriculture and Urban Forestry 37(3):108-117. M Kuo, F.E., & Sullivan, W.C., 2001. Environment and crime in the inner city: Does vegetation reduce crime? i c Environment & Behavior, 33(3), 343-367. rn� Kuo, F.E., 2003. The role of arboriculture in a healthy social ecology: Invited review article for a Special Section. N Journal of Arboriculture 29(3), 148-155. a. Land and Water Conservation Fund, 2012, nps.gov. National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior. http://www.nps.gov/lwcf/ Miller, R. W. 1988. Urban Forestry: Planning and Managing Urban Greenspaces. New Jersey: Prentice Hall. U) c The Nature Conservancy. 2012, www.nature.org 0 E The National Arbor Day Foundation, 2012, Tree City USA Award, http://www.arborday.org/ w Natural Resources Canada. 2015. Cooley Spruce Gall Adelgid. Northeastern Area State and Private Forestry. c E 2005. Forest Health Protection —Emerald Ash Border. Newtown Square, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, U Forest Service, Northeastern Area State and Private Forestry. a http://www.na.fs.fed.us/spfo/eab/index.html Northeastern Area State and Private Forestry. 2005. Forest Health Protection —Dutch Elm Disease. Newtown Square, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Area State and Private Forestry. http://na.fs.fed.us/fhp/ded Oregon State University (OSU), 2017. College of Forestry, Swiss Needle Cast. http://sncc.forestry.oregonstate.edu/glossary/term/17 PNW Plant Disease Handbook PNW Insect Handbook Appendices 66 Packet Pg. 318 8.1.a Pscheidt, J.W., and Ocamb, C.M., senior editors. 2019. Pacific Northwest Plant Disease Management Handbook [online]. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University. http://pnwhandbooks.org/plantdisease (accessed 31 March 2019). Puget Sound Clean Air Agency, 2012, http://www.pscleanair.org/ Puget Sound Partnership, 2012, www.psparchives.com Science Now. Tree Leaves Fight Pollution. October 2010. sciencemag.org. Web 11/05/2010. http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/2010/10/tree-leaves-fight-pollution.html Simpson, James, 2002. "Improved estimates of tree -shade effects on residential use," Energy and Buildings 34, 1067-1076. Simpson, J.R. and E.G. McPherson. 2000. Energy and air quality improvements through urban tree planting. In: Kollin, C., (ed.). Building cities of green: proceedings of the 1999 national urban forest conference; Seattle. Washington, D.C.: American Forests: 110-112. "Snohomish County Public Utility District No. 1." Trees Near Power Lines I Residential I Snohomish County PUD, 15 Dec. 2017, www.snopud.com/home/treetrim.ashx?p=1219. The Trust for Public Lands. 2012, www.tpl.org U.S. Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Division, 2017. Urban Ecosystems and Processes (UEP). https://www.fs.fed. us/psw/topics/urba n—forestry/ U.S. Department of Energy, 2004. "Green Roofs," Federal Technology Alert DOE/EE-0298, Federal Energy Management Program. Washington Department of Ecology, 2011— Slope Stabilization and Erosion Control, http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/sea/pubs/93-30/index.html Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2009. Land Use Planning For Salmon, Steelhead and Trout. http://wdfw.wa.gov/publications/00033/psst—externa I reviewd raftJu ne152009.pdf Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2016. Periodic Status Review for the Bald Eagle. http://wdfw.wa.gov/publications/01825/draft_wdfw01825.pdf Washington Department of Natural Resources. 2018. https://www.dnr.wa.gov/ Washington State, 1990. Washington State Growth Management Act (RCW 36.70A.070 (1) Land Use Elementl). Washington State University Extension, 2008, WSU Extension Publishing and Printing, http://cru.cahe.wsu.edu/CEPublications/ebl380e/ebl380e.pdf Wickman, Boyd, et al., 1988. Forest Insect & Disease Leaflet Douglas -Fir Tussock Moth 86. https://www.fs.fed.us/psw/topics/urban — forestry/ Wolf, K.L. 1998, "Urban Nature Benefits: Psycho -Social Dimensions of People and Plants".University of Washington Center for Urban Horticulture, Human Dimensions of the Urban Forest, Fact Sheet #1. Wolf, K.L. 2007. The Environmental Psychology of Trees. International Council of Shopping Centers Research Review. 14, 3:39-43. Xiao, Q.; McPherson, E.G.; Simpson, J.R.; Ustin, S.L. 2007. Hydrologic processes at the urban residential scale. Hydrological Processes 21:2174-2188. Xiao, Q., E.G. McPherson, S.L. Usfin and M.E. Grismer. 2000. A new approach to modeling tree rainfall interception. Journal of Geophysical Research 105(D23) :29,173-29,188 67 Appendices Packet Pg. 319 8.1.a Appendix B9. Table of Figures P-jures Figure 1: Land Cover Classes 5,23 Figure 2: Fragmentation Comparison 24 Figure 3: Forest Fragmentation 25 Figure 4: Tree Canopy by Park 27 Figure 5: Most Valuable Environmental Benefit 53 Figure 6: Most Valuable Intangible Benefit 54 Figure 7: Maintenance Expectations 55 Tabler Table 1: Benchmark Values 3 Table 2: Tree Canopy of 5 Largest Parks 27 Table 3: Acres of Sensitive Area by Fragmentation 28 Table 4: Percent Sensitive Area by Fragmentation 29 Table 5: Decision matrix for urban forest management in Edmonds 31 Table 6: 2016 Urban Forestry Expenditures 32 Table 7: Current Urban Forest Workload and Staffing Levels 32 Table 8: Summary of Current City of Edmonds Tree Cutting Regulations 40 Appendice, 68 Packet Pg. 320 8.1.a Appendix C: Community Survey Responses Introduction: The survey questions provided a public feedback opportunity during the early stages of plan development. They were designed to solicit input from residents and businesses in the City of Edmonds and help guide the plan development by understanding about how respondents. The questions were arranged into 4 groups: • How do you value trees? • Your opinion about public trees. (City managed trees on streets and in parks) • Your opinion about private trees. (privately managed trees) • Who are you? (Simple Demographics) While providing valuable information, the results of this survey should not be interpreted to be a statistically significant survey representing all of Edmonds. 175 individuals responded to the survey (0.4 percent of the Edmonds population) and the geographic distribution of respondents was not a control factor, as a result the survey responses may include an over representation of view properties. However, these responses do represent views of many citizens who are particularly interested in the management of the City's urban forest. Question 2: Trees are known to provide benefits to the environment. Understanding which benefits are most appreciated by residents can help guide long-term management strategies. Please rank (1-5) the following ENVIRONMENTAL benefits in order of their value to you. (i.e., 1 = most valuable and 5 = least valuable): Ilmprovec ' Quality Energy Savings FProtect Water Quality/Reduced Stormwater Runoff Carbon Storage Wildlife Habitat Other 69 Appendices Packet Pg. 321 8.1.a Question 1: Trees are important to the quality of life in Edmonds. Responses Strongly Agree 74.86% 131 Agree 21.71% 38 lisagree 2.297. Strongly Disagree 0.57% 1 Not sur 0.00% 0 Not Sure 0.57% 1 Other (please specify) 0.00% 0 Question 2 (Extended) 36.57% 64 24.00% 4 7 14.29% jA 4.57% 8 5.14% 9 13.71% 24 26.86% 47 21.71% 38 36.57% 64 25.71% 45 10.29M 8 8.57% 15 8.57% 15 17.14% 30 36.00% 63 28.57% 50 45 22.29% 39 12.57% 22 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 49.71% 87 P5.71%14FRO 29.71% 52 10.86% 19 0.00% 0 175 2.88 17 175 3.3 1175]64.49 0 0 Appendices 70 Packet Pg. 322 8.1.a Question 3: Trees also provide less tangible benefits to society. Understanding which of these benefits are most appreciated by residents can help guide long-term management strategies. Please rank (1-8) the following AESTHETIC and/or SOCIOECONOMIC benefits in order of their value to you. (i.e., 1= most valuable and 8 = least valuable): Attractive to Residents 14.86% 26 21.71% 38 16.00% 28 13.14% 23 Beauty/Aesthetics 34.29% 60 21.14% 37 14.86% 26 14.29% 25 Shaded Trails,sidewalks, and bike trails 21.71% 38 17.14% 30 24.00% 42 11.43% 20 Shaded Parking 2.86% 5 3.43% 6 8.57% 15 9.71% 17 rover wand neighborhoo 14% 9 10.29% 18 1W9/. 22 13.71% 24 Increased Property Values 4.00% 7 5.14% 9 5.14% 9 9.71% 17 Passive creatio 4% 9 6.86% 12 12.00% 21 4.00% 7 Shaded streets/Buffer from vehicles 13.14% 23 16.00% 28 12.00% 21 16.00% 28 Question 4: Optional. Use this space to provide additional comments on the benefits of Edmonds' public trees. Answered 60 Skipped 115 Question 5: What is your current awareness of the City's urban forest program? Please check all that apply. I was not aware that t I have visited the City's webpage for information about public trees and/or the urban forest I have read a newspaper article that discussed public trees and/or Edmonds' urban forest I have participated or volunteered with tree related events in the City Other (please specify) 71 Appendices Packet Pg. 323 8.1.a Question 3 (Extended) 15.43% 27 9.71% 17 6.86 % 12 2. 29% 4 7.43% 13 2.86% 5 2.29% 4 2.86% 5 9.71% 17 9.7�7 4.57% 8 1.71% 3 29.71% 52 8.57% 15 17.71% 31 19.43% 34 1.143% 34 18. 9% 32 1F29% 25 6.29% 11 10.29% 18 13.71% 24 22.86% 40 29.14% 51 14.86% 26 20.00% 35 21. 15.43% 27 13.71% 24 13.14% 23 9.71% 17 6.29% 11 Question 5 (Extended) 36.69% 62 23.67% 40 52.07% 88 14.79% 25 0 �5.39 175 6.29 175 3.03 175 4.25 175 3.05 175 4.89 Appendices 72 Packet Pg. 324 8.1.a Question 6: Trees can grow to obstruct streets and sidewalks. How often do you encounter this issue with trees in the public rights -of -way. Daily 13.02% 22 Weekly 11.83% 20 10.65 % 18 Several Times AYear 34.32% 58 Never J 30.18% 51 Answered .• Skipped 61 Question 7: Trees can become damaged or develop structural weakness over time, these issues may be risks for injury to persons or property. How often do you encounter this issue with public trees? &J 9 Weekly 4.14% 7 - 2.96% 5 Several Times A Year 41.42% 70 Never 46.15% 78 Question 8: Trees can appear sick and unhealthy from damage by insects, diseases, or simply poor tree care regimes. How often do you observe this issue with public trees? i 5.33AMb 9 Weekly _ 2.96% 5 /lonthly 5.92% 10 Several Times A Year 43.20% 73 Never 42.60% 72 73 Appendices Packet Pg. 325 8.1.a Question 9: In general, I am satisfied with the current level of maintenance provided for Edmonds' public trees. Strongly agre= 10.65% 18 Agree 59.17% 100 Disagree � 11.83% 20 Strongly Disagree 8.88% 15 Not SIT,_9.47% 16 Answered 169 Skipped 61 Appendice, Packet Pg. 326 8.1.a Question 10: What level of maintenance would you prefer for public trees? Please rank the following options according to your preference (1 = most desirable; 5 = Least desirable) None -Keep them natural Best possible care (all trees should look good) Clearance only (keep th ewalks and streets clear) Take care of hazardous trees. Holistic Plant Health Care (Improve the urban forest, but not necessarily every tree) Question 11: Edmonds needs more public trees. jWngly Agree A7.87% 64 Agree 28.99% 49 Fsagree 17.16% 29 Strongly disagree 5.33% 9 not sure 10.65% 1 Xnmswwered 169 Skipped Question 12: Where would you like to see more public trees planted? Please check as many as apply. 59.17% 100 Open spaces and Natural Areas 60.36% 102 59.17% 100 Golf Courses 11.24% 19 Downtown 42.60% 72 Trails and bike paths 45.56% 77 dmonds has enough public trees 20.12% 34 Other (please specify) 17.75% 30 Answered 11F .• Skipped 75 Appendices Packet Pg. 327 8.1.a Question 10 (Extended) 3.55% 6 8.88% 15 10.06% 17 25.44% 43 45.56% 77 6.51% 11 169 1.92 15.38% 26 9.47% 16 21.89% 37 26.04% 44 23.08% 39 4.14% 7 169 2.67 6.51% 11 24.26% 41 27.81% 47 26.04% 44 10.65% 18 4.73% 8 169 2.89 52.07% 88 26.04% 44 14.20% 24 5.33% 9 1.78% 3 0.59% 1 169 4.22 21.89% 37 30.18% 51 23.08% 39 12.43% 21 8.28% 14 4.14% 1 3.47 Appendices 76 Packet Pg. 328 8.1.a Question 13: What types of education and public outreach would you like to see offered by the urban forestry program? Please check all that apply. eminars and workshops 1 44.38% 75 Interpretive trails and displays 59.76% 101 Website resources MMMISM 62.72% 106 Online videos (e.g. YouTube) 24.26% 41 /tree walks 55� Informational brochures 43.20% 73 Other (please specify) 11.83% 20 Question 14: Optional. Please use this space for any additional comments about the care of public trees. Answered 40 Skipped 135 Question 15: What is/are your biggest concern for trees in Edmonds? (Check as many as apply) Trees blocking my view 24.70% 41 Trees shading my yard 9.04% 15 Tree debris in 12.65% 21 Healthy mature trees being removed during development 68.67% 114 rnopy loss 57.83% 96 Loss of wildlife habitat 72.29% 120 Other Concerns(please specify) %% Appendices Packet Pg. 329 8.1.a Question 16: What are your experiences with trees on nearby properties around you? Please select any from this list any statements you agree with. ■ Trees near my property are a nuisance 11.98% 20 Trees near my property are a dangerous 17.37% 29 Trees near my property block views 29.34% 49 Trees near my property are beautiful 67.66% 113 Trees near nWpropqlF are healthy 59.28% 99 1 want more trees near my property 25.15% 42 have no trees near my property 0.637o I don't agree with any of these statements. 2.40% 4 Question 17: When private properties are developed or improved, trees on the property can be impacted. Should the City be involved with protecting trees on private property during construction? Answer Choices .. Yes. The City should require property owners to preserve trees on private parcels where reasonably possible. 53.89% 90 No. This City of Edmonds should not concern itself with trees on private property. 17.96% 30 Not sure. This issue is more complicated. 28.14% 47 Appendices 78 Packet Pg. 330 8.1.a Question 18: In your opinion, what are the best ways to encourage tree planting and preservation on private property? Please select as many as apply. ir Education and outreach 79.04% 132 Information about how to hire a professional tree care company 29.34% 49 Require tree care companies to have a certified arborist on staff 28.74% 48 Free (or low-cost) Trees 55.09% 92 Ordinances, Rules or Regulations 35.33% 59 Other (please specify) 22.75% 38 Question 19: Optional. Please use this space for any additional comments about trees on private property. ditional Comments Answered ., Skipped 131 Question 20: Which gender do you identify with? A III nswer Choices Male 1 28.66% 47 Female 59.76% 98 Gender Diverse" 1.83% 3 Prefer not to answer 9.76% 16 79 Appendices Packet Pg. 331 Question 21: What age group are you representing? 8.1.a Under 18 0.00% 0 18 to 25 1.22% 2 26 to 35 4.27% 7 36 to 45 11.59% 19 46 to 55 21.34% 35 56+ 61.59% 101 Question 22: Where do you live in Edmonds? Please choose a neighborhood from the list below. Downtown/The Bowl 40.85% 67 Westgate 7.32% 12 rive Corners 8.54% 14 Perrinville 4.88% 8 IMeadowdale M4.27% 7 Seaview 15.24% 25 Lake Ballinger 22% 2 HWY 99 3.05% 5 ther (please specify) 14.63% 24 Appendice, 80 Packet Pg. 332 Question 23: What is your relationship with Edmonds' urban forest. (Choose all that apply) 8.1.a I am a resident of Edmonds M 95.12% 156 1 am a frequent visitor to Edmonds 10.98% 18 q own a business in Edmonds 6.71% 11 I appreciate public trees 72.56% 119 1 have planted public trees as a volunteer 18.90% J1 I help care for a public tree adjacent to my property 10.98% 18 have donated money to a non-profit foundation in support of public trees 15.85% 31 None of the above 0.61% 1 16ther (please specify) 7 81 Appendices Packet Pg. 333 8.1.a Question 24: Please provide any additional comments or feedback (Optional) Answered 33 Skipped 142 Appendice, 82 Packet Pg. 334 8.1.a Appendix D: Open House Summary Report On June 22nd, 2017, the City of Edmonds hosted the first of two open houses in the Brackett Room at City Hall to share information about the City of Edmonds Urban Forestry Management Plan and gather input from citizens. The open house included a presentation by Ian Scott of Davey Resource Group and a brief Q and A from the audience to ask clarifying questions. The presentation provided attendees an overview of Edmonds' urban forest, an introduction to what will be included in the Urban Forest Management Plan, and that the Davey Resource Group team has completed to date. Following the presentation, attendees were invited to provide input- thoughts, ideas, concerns, questions- on six discussion/opinion boards where a broad topic was introduced on each board followed by initial suggestions generated through the prior stakeholder interview process. Attendees were invited to express their opinions using dots (where green= a positive "vote"/ agreement for the suggestion, yellow= concern/ hesitation of the suggestion, and red= a negative "vote"/disagreement or dislike of the suggestion). Attendees were invited to use as many dots of each color necessary to express their opinion of each suggestion on each board. In addition, each board provided an area for Additional Suggestions where attendees were invited to write down their thoughts, ideas, concerns, questions on a sticky note and adhere it to the board for other attendees to review and "vote" on, as well. Lastly, a confidential and anonymous option was provided for attendees to provide comments and feedback by writing their thoughts, ideas, concerns and questions on index cards that were placed inside a box and not shared at the public meeting. The Davey Resource Group team also provided a link for attendees to give additional feedback through an online survey. That survey can be accessed via the home page on the City of Edmonds website, under the "What's New..." section: • https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/ EdmondsUFMP Local media provided public announcements of the open house leading up to the event: • http://myedmondsnews.com/2017/06/ rem inder-open-house-managing-citys-tree- cover-set-june-22/ • https://edmondsbeacon.villagesoup.com/p/ open-house-planned-to-discuss-managing-city- s-tree-cover/1660111?source=WeeklyHeadlines My Edmonds News covered the open house and provided a news story and video of the presentation to the public: • http://myedmondsnews.com/2017/06/public- asked-share-ideas-managing-edmonds-urban- forest/ • http://myedmondsnews.com/2017/06/now- video-open-house-plan-manage-edmonds- urban-forests/ 83 Appendices Packet Pg. 335 8.1.a Opinion Board #1: What tree benefits do you most appreciate? A. Improved Air Quality - B. Energy Savings elllbMReduced StormwateglMnoff ■ D. Carbon Storage ET Wildlife Habitat ■ F. Beauty/Aesthetics G. Shaded trails, sidewalks, and bike H. Improved retail areas and neighborhoods I. Increased prope J. Shaded streets and parking lots K. Additional Ideas Wind protection (think roof shingles); noise reduction; shade- calm/healing; sound of wind through branches; hi -class (untreed neighborhoods proven to have higher crime- "the projects" don't get trees, Bellevue does); soil retention; cools streams; coastal trees involved in weather cycle to prevent inland desertification City revenue increase with more views Air quality requires big, tall trees 4 A& 7 14 12 4 3 _7 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 4 2 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Appendice, Packet Pg. 336 8.1.a Opinion Board #2: What types of outreach and education are I - nrAfArrArl /vali iorl7 A. Electronic (websites, links, youtube, apps) 2 0 0 i. Species selection 4 0 0 ii 1 0 0 iii. Tree pruning 4 1 0 Interactive tree selector 1 1 0 V. Irrigation 1 0 0 olunteer opportunities 1 0 0 B. Hard copy (pamphlets, newsletter) 3 0 0 Species selectio� 3 1 0 ii. Tree planting 1 0 0 iii. Tree pruning 3 1 0 iv. Irrigation 0 0 0 C. Hands-on (Workshops, seminars) 2 0 0 i. Tree planting 2 0 0 Tree pruning 5 0 0 iii. Irrigation 0 0 0 Volunteer opportunities 1 0 0 D. Additional Ideas 7 1 0 Neighborhoo Ings for education and outreach 0 0 Maybe a pamphlet with a map of specific trees of interest 0 0 0 Pamphlets telling what species of trees on city property amount of carbon storage, % stormwater absorption- info which appeared tied to Main St trees for a very short time. Maybe 0 0 0 story in the Beacon [local newspaper with print and online circulation] New name needed 0 0 0 85 Appendices Packet Pg. 337 Opinion Board #3: What is/are your biggest concern(s) for t in Edmonds? Trees blocking my view B. Trees shading my yard 3 0 7 ft Tree debris in 1 5 D. Healthy mature trees being removed 12 0 3 [E. Canopy loss 3 F. Loss of wildlife habitat 15 0 3 Additional Co Private development- current Edmonds land use code allows developers to completely clear treed lots for development 1 0 0 (residential, commercial, etc). This is not okay. It disrupts urban IS omeone who would be willing to negotiate or help mediate V between neighbors having difficulty with trees vs. view, perhaps 1 0 0 Lto come to the home if asked and accepted by both parties Need to address invasives in our forests that prevent the 0 0 0 establishment of seedlings. Without that there will be no forests Critical areas ordinances are not followed- All native vegetation 0 0 is removed for development This becomes a question of aesthetics- learn to see trees, which are beautiful and characteristic of the luxuriant NW where we 2 0 0 have chosen to reside- as the "view". Trees are very connected to the idea of "the commons" in which we have not much I believe these green dots indicate agreement with the stated additional concern. 'Note: for this opinion board: Green dots = concerned Red dots = not concerned ONE Appendice- 86 Packet Pg. 338 8.1.a Opinion Board #4: What level of maintenance would you prefer for aublic trees? A. None (keep them natural) 1 4 2 B. Best possible care (all trees should look good) 7 1 3 Mlearan� (keep sidewalks and streets clear) 7 1 1 D. Take care of hazardous trees 10 2 0 lolistic plant health care (improve the urban forest, but not necessarily every tree) 8 3 0 F. Additional Ideas In past, City has been resistant to allow removal of dangerous and dying trees even when 3 arborists said remove. Need 0 0 0 process to effectively deal with dangerous trees. Utilize/ plant and replace trees that "heave" the sidewalks. ie- 2 0 0 avoid trees that interfere with built environment. Native trees preferred. Alder are not trash tree 0 Edmonds is a City of Views- Very important that property owner's views are protected. As a first step/tonight's meeting 0 1 0 working together to protect environment as well as property owners will put this plan in a more optimistic mode. There were not actually green dots placed on this Additional Idea sticky note, but two other people wrote "Agree" directly on the note itself. 87 Appendices Packet Pg. 339 8.1.a Opinion Board #5: Where would you like to see more trees planted? A. Parks B. Open Spaces Commercial properties D. Streets and medians E. Parking lots M F. Private properties G. Along railroad- need tall ones to defray pollutants. Along all arterials for same reason. Along streams to keep them cool 10 0 0 10 0 1 9 2 0 7 3 2 0 8 1 1 1 0 0 Appendices 88 Packet Pg. 340 8.1.a Opinion Board #6: What are the best ways to encourage tree I M planting and preservation on private property? A. Free (or low-cost) trees 10 0 0 B. Information about how to hire a professional tree care 3 0 0 company Education and Outreach 16i 0 0 D. Tree planting events 5 0 0 Additional Ideas Update land use code so developers cannot clear all of the trees when building. Current code allows to clear the entire lot. 3 0 1 Education- slow but steady so that folk begin to know that all the oxygen we breathe is produced by (largely) trees- for "views" 0 0 0 we can cut out our lungs. Provide ideas for good trees that are more like 15 ft tall in order 3 0 0 to keep both trees and preserve view. City needs a full-time arborist. Codes should: 3 0 0 Neighbor education and outreach (about critical areas and streamside property management more important than public 0 0 0 meetings for general public) �a FL c E aD a� L 0 U_ D 0 T Cl) tD 0 I r O N IL u_ Q c 0 E w c aD E t r Q 89 Appendices Packet Pg. 341 1 1. W}rot tree benefit do YOU i111p5t appreciate? I r r...rri#r r twmr�a..iay{E.3pd7ra+n.r.eNrRrrReN #ii�i##•i*#• • i"2GF"• Lam' ]r h.41y r+w.r.r#rr. r#• r, INew r/awrl Wri[r -� ii ••#�iii.ir uya rrra.i+Lvote.ardiavTrm i#*9..e �. N. 0#aroma M'y.wNY�a-ice #i# k *r� `� orA�Lw,Y ibr 8.1.a M M: ' r t 2. What types of vutreoth and 3. What is cre your Biggest ' L; education are preferred valued? : concern(s) for trees in Edrnorlds? A_ E40ronic (Websile, links, Youfube, Apps)111 A. kaos blocking my aiaw 1N 4. 5wier fak.r:an 00 a iM. I.rrr&&F.+Tn.rsear is ti. iroas shodirkp my yard 0 • *. Nri�,riq.� � • • +�. WImsF..r oppnrr..,.eirr� �. 4�lard Cot}y {PPrTrphiotS, P#ewirelt4•es j�� xrex r-anrw,p :.o # • C• M4ss¢F-On JWori&966pst Sam non#}IDO i Tr_?lnre:•p R T�hvr~Q Uses iw 4.ynrilon W. Yelrna.rrOFpa•hn4ier� ¢. jk;{driipnal ldwni �`~r C- Trm dnhris in my yard # 0 • •• i D- Hapllby srsaTunv F.awsL.ing ramvYadi •o• • • ••• tr, Canopy lore * 4ft 000 00 I. Loss ofwirdld,aliabgal •1M0aSo•0 0 *• else 0 W:'d Ad. impi4l Concerns sue'.... r # r 6. Whot are the best ways to f encourage tree planting and f 5. Where would you like to e more preservation on Private Property? v What level of rnalri.. 01te would trees planted? seq. Frap far low-ea3F� rroes you prefer far pul�liI frees? A. Fora. 1 A, Noe Weep the- rwsyral) i #* i i i iir •!• �• open $peers •�• •rr {. Cvmmerciel Properries • ii #reel D. Streets and Medians ip i ai r ii r E. Parking LOT& • F'- Privaxv Prapsftias i iii* i r G. RddiTionalldaos i $. B.e.rpOaible Sars {orrTTaes ilsasrld lank goad] *i ii *one* C. Clibumn&e only jkawp sidewalks & stroe+s rlrs •#ii ir. # D- Tckv care of ho:ordoo. r i ill •ri.i i E. Hdisric Planl firaF+ir Cwe jlmprova rh. w, hen iora5F, bul ncl 4e4oFSPrily axery rree) 0i6 • i l # F. Addr;OnallJcc �-•t? B, Inforrnation obour how re hire a professional tree care I tympany as C. Edutatiao and OuTraach :r# • Il! 0, Troo Planning [venis •0#o• [• A OdiNanat ideas 1� C FL C d N CM M C� L N L O U_ C M L L �r T �r M co I CD �I 0 N a D N C O W C N M 0 M a+ a Appendices 90 Packet Pg. 342 8.1.a Additional anonymous comments: Change name "Urban Forest"- bad impression, oxymoron. Suggestion- Best plant/tree for Best location • Wondering what is/can be done to encourage people to maintain views for neighbors around them? • Let's separate view areas from non -view areas. Right tree for right location. I am concerned about safety regarding older trees in both private and public spaces. We have 70+ year old trees in our neighborhood that lose branches with most wind storms. Who watches out for the health of those trees and probability of danger? Most people would have no idea where to begin, let alone be able to afford to do something like hire an arborist. (signed J Thompson) Questions from the public asked during the presentation: Question regarding how the 30% canopy cover was determined- comment that that number seemed really high. Wondering if there is a uniform process used by all cities. Made comment that grants were judged by how much canopy a City had. Asked for clarification on what the process that was used to determine 30% canopy cover. • Question asking for clarification of the intention of the UFMP- to handle City trees (as stated in an early slide) or is it actually expanded to handle private trees too. Commenter asked for clarification on defining "what is a tree"- a 30ft lilac ... is that a tree? A big rhododendron- is that a tree? • Commenter referring to tree planting suggestions (provided an sign in table on yellow paper)- had a question about why is there not any evergreen on that suggestion guide? Commenter asked question regarding tree topping being preferable to cutting a tree to the ground. Expressed concern over making a "blanket rule" that tree topping is bad or not preferable. • Question regarding information on what kinds of trees do what kinds of things- eg. a fir versus an oak- and where is that kind of data available at? Question referring to the chart shown in the presentation comparing Edmonds with other cities- does that chart take into consideration view property- does it differentiate where there are view properties and where there are not? Commenter suggested that a significant portion of the City [of Edmonds] has views. 91 Appendices Packet Pg. 343 8.1.a Attendance City of Edmonds: • Dave Teitzel, Edmonds City Council • Shane Hope, Development Services Director • Carrie Hite, Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services Director • Phil Williams, Public Works and Utilities Director • Kernen Lien, Senior Planner • Rich Lindsay, Park Maintenance Manager • Jeanie McConnell, Engineering Program Manager • Brad Shipley, Planner • Debora Ladd, Parks Maintenance Staff Project Team Members: • Ian Scott, Davey Resources Group • Ian Lefcourte, Davey Resources Group • Keeley O'Connell, Nature InSight Consulting Members of the public: • Approximately SO Appendice, 92 Packet Pg. 344